Agenda — Pacifica City Council, March 9, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Christine Boles
Vice Mayor Greg Wright
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
City Council Regular Meeting 1 March 09, 2026
SPECIAL and REGULAR MEETING
March 09, 2026 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Off-street parking is allowed by permit for attendance at official public meetings.

Vehicles parked without permits are subject to citation. You should obtain a permit from the rack in the lobby and place it on the dashboard of your vehicle in such a manner as is visible to law enforcement personnel.

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES DURING MEETING
Alternative Ways to Observe and Participate in the Meeting:

The primary method for observing and participating in the meeting is in-person at the meeting location published in the meeting agenda. However, there are alternative ways to observe and participate:
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • Watch on TV on Comcast channel 26
• Watch a Live Stream of the meeting by following https://www.cityofpacifica.org/LiveStream or www.pacificcoast.tv
• Live Remote Public Comments (offered on a pilot basis):
• Join Zoom Webinar: https://pacifica-gov.zoom.us/j/81156158241 • OR Dial-in: 1-669-900-6833 | Webinar ID: 811 5615 8241 o Press * 9 to raise your hand to request to speak.
o Press * 6 to unmute when called upon to speak by the last 4-digits of your phone #. • When the Mayor announces the Agenda Item on which you would like to comment, raise your hand in Zoom. You will be called upon my screenname or last 4-digits of phone number if dialing in. Please mute any background sound and state your full name at the start of your comment.

Please note that Alternative platforms for participation are subject to underlying technology functionality and may be modified or interrupted at any time without notice. • Written Public Comments:

BEFORE THE MEETING: Written public comments may be submitted in advance by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date by email to: [email protected]. Written public comments submitted by email should adhere to the following:
• Clearly indicate the Agenda Item No. or specify “Public Comment on Item Not on Agenda” in the Subject Line
• Include the submitter’s full name
Written public comments received by 12:00 p.m. on the meeting date will be provided in their entirety to the City Council and posted to the City’s website prior to the meeting but will not be read verbally at the meeting.

AT THE MEETING: Materials in writing provided at the meeting should provide seven (7) copies to provide for each Councilmember, City Clerk and City staff.

City Council Regular Meeting 2 March 09, 2026
4:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION
00a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 and paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9: Two Cases. 6:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Roll Call
Reading of Land Acknowledgment
The City of Pacifica acknowledges that we occupy the unceded ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. We honor the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples for their enduring commitment to Mother Earth. As the Indigenous protectors of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded, lost, nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. We affirm their sovereign rights as First Peoples and wish to pay our respects to the ancestors, elders, and relatives of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples.

Salute to the Flag led by Councilmember Espinosa
Closed Session Report

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse (CORA) Recognition of Pacifica Police Officer
B. Special Presentation - Introduction of New City Employees C. Special Presentation - Introduction of Poet Laureate Erin Christ D. Proclamation - City Manager Kevin Woodhouse (Retirement)

CONSENT CALENDAR
Persons wishing to address the Council on any Consent Calendar item may do so at this time. Each speaker will be allotted three minutes. Those wishing to address the Council on any item listed on the agenda should submit a speaker card to the City Clerk.

Public meetings are a limited public forum, meaning that there are rules for commenting at these meetings. Comments on consent agenda items must relate to that specific item.

If comments do not relate to a specific agenda item, then City will provide you with an initial warning to stay on topic. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

City Council Regular Meeting 3 March 09, 2026
Items on the consent calendar will be adopted by one motion unless a Councilmember requests, before the vote on the motion, to have an item discussed. Time limit on comments is three minutes or less.

1. Approval of Disbursements for 2/1/26 through 2/28/26 PROPOSED ACTION: Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of February 2026.

2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the January 12, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting (as amended) and the January 26, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting.

3. Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

4. Continuation of Proclamation of a Local Emergency at the Sewer Mains Crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood
PROPOSED ACTION: Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist at the Sewer Mains Crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood.

5. Notice of Completion for the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project; and authorize the City Manager to release the retention funds to the contractor.

6. Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission (“SLC”) for the Continued Use of Tidal and Submerged Lands as a Public Fishing Pier (Pacifica Pier) and Other Uses.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution Approving Lease Agreement 4585 between the City of Pacifica and the State Lands Commission (“SLC”) for the continued use of tidal and submerged lands as a public fishing pier (Pacifica Pier) and other uses; finding the approval of the Lease Agreement exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Lease Agreement and any related documents.

7. Approval of Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Swanson Architects for Design and Engineering Services related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Update.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing a Consultant Services City Council Regular Meeting 4 March 09, 2026
Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects for design and engineering services in the amount of $148,340.00 in connection to the ADA Self-Evaluation Transition Plan Update; approve budget authority in the amount of $163,174.00 which includes 10% contingency and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related with the plan.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
This portion of the Agenda is available for the public to address the City Council on any issue that is not on the Agenda. Any person wishing to address the Council shall be recognized by the Mayor during this time, provided, however, that only items not on the Agenda for that meeting may be addressed. Comments on non-agendized items must address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If comments do not address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City, the City will provide you with an initial warning to stay within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If the warning is not followed, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to cut off the microphone.

Councilmembers shall not enter into debate with speakers under Public Comments on Items Not on the Posted Agenda. A maximum of three minutes will be allowed for any speaker.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

8. 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to adopt a Resolution accepting the City’s 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan, and directing the City Manager to transmit the reports to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI).

9. Mid-year budget review and adoption of a resolution to amend the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget.

PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution authorizing the mid-year FY 2025-26 Operating and Capital Budget amendments.

10. Consideration and Adoption of Resolution Appointing Yulia Carter as Interim City Manager and Approving the Employment Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Yulia Carter for Interim City Manager Services
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Appointing Yulia Carter as Interim City Manager and Approving the Employment Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Yulia Carter for Interim City Manager Services.

11. City Manager’s Farewell Report
PROPOSED ACTION: The City Manager’s “Farewell Report” is intended to provide City Council Regular Meeting 5 March 09, 2026
observations about numerous Pacifica issues by reflecting on numerous accomplishments and emphasizing challenges and opportunities facing Pacifica moving forward. This is an informational item only, no action required by the City Council.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Council Communications is for Councilmembers to inform each other of items of potential interest to other Councilmembers, such as interagency meetings.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
The purpose of Staff Communications is for the City Manager to offer announcements as appropriate.

ADJOURN
NOTICE: If you challenge a city's zoning, planning or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judicial review of any city administrative decision may be had only if a petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of the final decision The City of Pacifica will provide assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 24 hours advance notice to the City Manager’s Office (650) 738-7301, or send request via email to:
[email protected] if you need sign language assistance or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.

The Pacifica Municipal Code is available online at the City’s website (www.cityofpacifica.org/municode);

HOW TO OBTAIN CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS
Posted agendas:

Agendas are posted no later than Friday prior to the City Council meeting date, at the entrance to the City Hall location at 170 Santa Maria Avenue, Pacifica.

View on the Internet:

Follow the link to Council agenda, at www.cityofpacifica.org E-mail subscription:

Send a request to Sarah Coffey, at [email protected] City Clerk’s Office/City Manager’s Office
City Hall, 170 Santa Maria Ave.

Council meetings:

Agendas are available at the City Council meeting

HOW TO REACH YOUR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
• San Mateo County Supervisor Ray Mueller, District 3, 500 County Center, Redwood City CA 94063 (650) 363-4569
• Governor Gavin Newsom, State Capitol Building, Sacramento CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 • State Senator Josh Becker, 1528 So. El Camino Real, Suite 303, San Mateo CA 94402 (650) 212-3313 • Assembly Member Marc Berman, 721 Colorado Ave, Suite 101, Palo Alto CA 94303 (650) 324-0224 • Congressman Sam Liccardo, 1117 Longworth House Office Building, Washington DC 20515 (202) 225-8104
City Council Regular Meeting 6 March 09, 2026
• Senator Alex Padilla, 331 Hart Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3553 • Senator Adam Schiff, SD-B40B Dirksen Senate Office Building, Washington DC 20510 (202) 224-3841 • President Donald J. Trump, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington DC 20500

CITY COUNCIL
• Mayor Christine Boles, [email protected]
• Vice Mayor Greg Wright, [email protected]
• Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mary Bier, [email protected]
• Councilmember Mayra Espinosa, [email protected]

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Disbursements for 2/1/26 through 2/28/26
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Receive and file the Monthly Check Register Report for the month of February 2026.

STAFF CONTACT:

Lucy Xie, Deputy Finance Director
(650) 501-6014
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Staff has submitted the following Monthly Check Register Report per California Government Code, Title 4, Division 3, Part 3, Chapter 3, Section 41004:

Disbursements dated 2/1/26 through 2/28/26 are in the amount of $2,405,002.90 (Attachment 1).

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of Monthly Check Register Report is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Enhance organizational and fiscal stability: Preparation of the Monthly Check Register Report supports sound financial oversight, transparency, and adherence to adopted fiscal controls.
• Broaden public communications and collaboration: Filing of the Monthly Check Register Report promotes transparency and accountability in City financial operations.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with acceptance of the Monthly Check Register Report.

ORIGINATED BY:

Finance Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (PDF)
1 Packet Pg. 7

1.a
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

1.a
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

1.a
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

1.a
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

1.a
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

1.a
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

1.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Monthly Check Register Report Feb 2026 (6164 : Disbursements)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Minutes
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to approve the minutes for the January 12, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting (as amended) and the January 26, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting.

STAFF CONTACT:

Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Move to approve the minutes for:
(1) the January 12, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting, as amended at Mayor Boles’ direction from the February 23, 2026 meeting (amendments are shown in tracked changes format); and
(2) the January 26, 2026 City Council Special and Regular Meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Within budgeted operational expenses.

ORIGINATED BY:

City Clerk
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (PDF)
Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (PDF) 2 Packet Pg. 15

CITY OF PACIFICA

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Council Chambers
2212 Beach Blvd
Pacifica, CA 94044
Mayor Christine Boles
Vice Mayor Greg Wright
Councilmember Sue Beckmeyer
Councilmember Mary Bier
Councilmember Mayra Espinosa
City Council Regular Meeting 1 January 12, 2026
SPECIAL and REGULAR MEETING
January 12, 2026 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Christine Boles called the meeting to order on January 12, 2026 at 4:30 PM 4:30 PM - CLOSED SESSION
00a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 and paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9: Two Cases. 6:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Boles reconvened the meeting at 6:10 p.m.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Christine Boles Mayor Present
Greg Wright Vice Mayor Present
Sue Beckmeyer Councilmember Present
Mary Bier Councilmember Present
Mayra Espinosa Councilmember Present
City Clerk Coffey took a verbal roll call.

Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager; Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director; Marisol Gómez, Finance & Administrative Services Director; Stephanie Douglas, PB&R Dep. Director; Melissa Tigbao, PW Director; Maria Sarasua, Police Chief; Roland Yip, PW Dep. Director-Engineering; Ryan Bianculli, Acting Police Captain; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Boles read the Land Acknowledgment.

Salute to the Flag led by Mayor Boles

2.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 January 12, 2026
Closed Session Report
City Manager Woodhouse stated there was no reportable action.

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Special Presentation - HIP Housing Annual Calendar
Peggy Jensen, HIP Board Member, presented the HIP Housing Annual Calendar.

Councilmember Bier remembered the work they did together with Homes for All which was good work for our community. She felt that was important to bring people together to have important discussions about homes.

Vice Mayor Wright thanked Ms. Jensen as housing is important to all councilmembers and they appreciate people like her trying to make it happen and remember that kids are part of this. He thanked Ms. Jensen for all her hard work and he looked forward to working with her in the future.

Councilmember Beckmeyer thanked Ms. Jensen for the calendar and asked if it is correct that HIP Housing has a new home.

Board Member Jensen stated HIP Housing moved in December and it is a hub for housing needs for San Mateo County and located across the street from San Mateo City Park. Clients have the opportunity to walk and wonderful space and rooms to be counseled.

Councilmember Espinosa thanked Ms. Jensen for the calendar and having the kids dream about the homes and wished they could be real homes for them. She thought having a place to go to every day is important and when you come home you feel safe.

Mayor Boles asked about the home share partnerships as an opportunity to educate the community if someone has a room free in their house or a senior needing help to pay their mortgage and exchanging gardening services.

Board Member Jensen stated that the HIP Housing Home Share Program is one of the premier programs provided in the nation. They look for people who have a room in their home and someone to help pay for rent and provide services to offset rent and someone to live with them.

She thinks about 350 people are involved in a home share program and there are many more people who are interested in sharing a home. The other thing that makes the HIP program so important is that there is much screening done to make sure it is a good match between the home provider and the person living with them. They provide ongoing check-ins to make sure everything is going well to make sure they have living agreements before moving even occurs. It is a very supportive successful program. What impressed her about the home sharing program was it essentially created more homes for people at an extremely low cost and a way to help people stay in their homes that they may have had for a very long time. They are also allowed to meet each other before making a commitment.

There were no public comments.

2.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 January 12, 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Woodhouse stated, for Item #7 regarding 570 Crespi, there is a correction to an exhibit indicating the rezoning boundary that extends on to the City-owned parcel. The corrected exhibit has been distributed and is available for the public at the meeting.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, stated she was speaking on No. 5, offshore oil drilling, and she thanked everyone who brought it forward and put together the letter. She shared her thoughts on our state standing firm against any new offshore oil drilling along California’s coast.

Cassandra, San Mateo County, stated she is present on behalf of Supervisor Ray Mueller in support of No. 5. She stated that Supervisors Mueller and Speier have authored a resolution in strong opposition to the federal administration’s oil and gas program which would open up California coast to offshore drilling and detailed this process and rationale involving the coast from Pacifica to Santa Cruz County line.

Gail Benton Shoemaker, Pacifica, stated she is speaking as a member of Tree City Pacifica regarding the impact fee report on the Consent Calendar. She shared an issue in the language with the tree ordinance that negated the two-for-one replacement. She requested that the wording be changed to remove the loophole in the language.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, stated she is speaking on Item No. 7, and shared her concerns about the City’s sale of City land to for-profit contractors. She also agreed with the previous speakers on Item No. 5.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

Vice Mayor Wright agreed with public comment on Item No. 5 and recognized staff for the work.

Mayor Boles also supported Councilmember Beckmeyer who wanted to put this on the agenda.

She thinks the language came from CalCities Coastal Cities working group to advocate for fighting with the federal government trying to take over our coast for oil drilling. It is important to have representation at the state level and she felt it was beautifully worded. She stated that they are all trying to do the right thing in the state and there are opportunities for offshore wind and other things for clean energy that we can look at, but oil is not what we need with potential threats to our coastline, economy and environment. She is sure our legislators will be looking at this from a legal angle, but it is important to speak up and support them.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated, when our legislators want to take action, having a significant number of cities echoing and leading on this issue helps bolster what they are trying to do. She also echoed Vice Mayor Wright in thanking staff for the action. She thought the Environmental Quality Committee will have something to say about it too and she was glad Mayor Boles is on that committee and looked forward to hearing about it after her first meeting.

Mayor Boles stated that she will note at this time that she will vote no on Item No. 7.

Councilmember Espinosa stated she is also voting no on Item No. 7.

Councilmember Bier moved to approve the consent calendar; seconded by Vice Mayor Wright.

2.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 January 12, 2026
CONSENT CALENDAR (EXCLUDING ITEM #7)
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa
AGENDA ITEM #7
RESULT: ADOPTED [3 TO 2]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier
NOES: Boles, Espinosa

1. Approval of Disbursements for 12/01/25 through 12/31/25 PROPOSED ACTION: Approval of Disbursements for 12/01/25 through 12/31/25

2. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the November 10, 2025 City Council Regular Meeting.

5. Offshore Drilling Letter of Opposition
PROPOSED ACTION: Direct the Mayor to send a letter (Attachment A) opposing the proposed 11th National Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Oil and Gas Leasing Program.

6. 2024-2025 Mitigation Fee Act Development Fee Review
PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving 2024-2025 Annual and Five-Year Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025.”

7. Adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica to approve (1) rezoning RZ-194-16 to rezone the northern portion of the project site to be developed from M-1 to C-2 and those portions of the project site to remain undeveloped to Open Space, and (2) zoning text amendment TA-116-19, to amend section 9-4.1101(b) of the Pacifica Municipal Code to add residential uses in horizontal mixed use developments as conditionally permitted uses in the C-2 (Community Commercial) zoning district; and Adoption of a an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica to approve Development Agreement DA-4-21 to approve and authorize a development agreement

2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 January 12, 2026
between Crespi Breakwater, LLC and City of Pacifica to provide certain public and private benefits in conjunction with a development project at 570 Crespi Drive (APN 022-162-310) and the eastern 55 feet of the City owned property at 540 Crespi Drive (APN 022-162- 420). (File No.: 2016-004, RZ-194-16, TA-116-19, DA-4-21) PROPOSED ACTION:
(1) Waive second reading and adopt an Ordinance entitled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica approving (1) Rezoning RZ-194-16 to Rezone the Northern Portion of the Project Site to be Developed from M-1 to C-2 and those Portions of the Project Site to Remain Undeveloped to Open Space, and (2) Zoning Text Amendment TA-116-19, to Amend Section 9-4.1101(B) of the Pacifica Municipal Code to Add Residential Uses in Horizontal Mixed Use Developments as Conditionally Permitted Uses in the C-2 (Community Commercial) Zoning District”; and (2) Waive second reading and adopt an Ordinance entitled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pacifica approving Development Agreement DA-4-21 to approve and authorize a development agreement between Crespi Breakwater LLC and City of Pacifica to provide certain public and private benefits in conjunction with a development project at 570 Crespi Drive (APN 022-162-310) and eastern 55 feet of the City owned property at 540 Crespi Drive (APN 022-162-420).”

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Anita Rees, Pacifica Resource Center, shared an update on PRC’s hours and recent work programs, including the Unhoused on the Coast outreach team, 1-Day Homeless Count, and Holiday Joy Program.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, stated she is speaking as Exec. Director of Sanchez Art Center and invited everyone to their first opening of the new year on January 16, a gallery showcase on January 31, and an artist talk on February 8.

Yomi Agunbiade, Pacifica, stated he is present on behalf of the Pacifica Resource Center, and shared information on their core services, like groceries, emergency financial assistance, homeless services, and pet services.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, shared her thoughts and concerns on federal changes in rules for funding of grant programs and emphasized the impact on HUD funding and Section 7 vouchered tenants. She encouraged those affected to reach out to the Housing Authority and advocates to follow National Alliance to End Homelessness Coalition.

Raymond Acosta, Pacifica, thanked Council and staff for their hard work, as well as all the committees and commissions and going forward in 2026, as well as HIP and PRC.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

8. Accept Update Report on Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project PROPOSED ACTION: Accept Update Report on Beach Boulevard Infrastructure Resiliency Project.

2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 January 12, 2026
City Manager Woodhouse, PW Dep. Director Yip, and GHD representative Aaron Holloway presented the staff report.

City Manager Woodhouse stated we are engaged in continuing advocacy with Congressman Liccardo who held a press conference in Pacifica regarding the Building Resilient Infrastructure Community’s grant and the importance of that program. He stated the federal environment is challenging right now. It will have to be a combination of local, regional, state, and federal funding to fund an $80 million construction project for a small City, which is the case across the country with most major infrastructure projects. Because of the significant three breaches in a row in fall and voids created, that creates an opportunity for us again in reaching out to state legislators, as well as federal, to emphasize the emergency importance of funding this critical infrastructure project which ties in to the importance to us about the shoreline adaptation planning work that we will be commencing and committed to with the Coastal Commission through our Local Coastal Land Use Plan, as well as our Coastal Access Resiliency Program. It is hard to think decades into the future and take care of those needs proactively if we cannot manage the immediate emergency situations we are confronted with.

Vice Mayor Wright asked for an estimated guess on how long we have left on the sea wall and the pier, considering how many breaches we have had, before it falls into the ocean.

Consultant Halloway stated we had to estimate that as part of the FEMA application and he recalls that, on the north side of the pier, the sea wall is in worse shape and where a lot of the failures occurred. About five years ago, the structural team did an estimated assessment of a 5-10 year time frame on that. He added that, after every failure that happens, more of the wall is filled with slurry. A large portion of that breach has been repaired. He thought the south wall is structurally stable, and the team estimated a longer time frame for that structure, such as 10-20 years.

Vice Mayor Wright asked about the pier.

Dep. Director Yip stated that we had recently completed a structural assessment of the pier after the rail had failed. There are different portions of the pier, and certain portions are in worse condition than others. The portion that is worse is the one closer to the oceanside, the L portion of the pier. The reason we have closed it off is because there are several components in that structural assessment that are very critical failures. In terms of the use, we will need to address all of the critical components of the pier. As far as how much longer we can keep the pier open, staff and GHD cannot put a definitive number on it. We can do a structural assessment after every winter, and that is typically what they have been doing to assess damages to it, to see how long we can keep half of the pier open.

Vice Mayor Wright concluded that those are not eligible for emergency repair.

Dep. Director Yip stated we need an emergency to be declared in order to apply for emergency funds. There is one from the State that we applied for and are still waiting to hear back for that.

Vice Mayor Wright asked, on the nourishment, how long do we expect that nourishment to last.

Consultant Halloway stated that the beach nourishment is an important part for public access and trying to improve opportunities for beach access. He stated it is not vital to the protection scheme, but it does help and provides a buffer as fewer. Those structures are designed to still provide protection if the beach goes away. He thinks the estimates are in the 3-10 years range. He stated that a lot of it depends on the type of material we place.

2.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 January 12, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright asked if there was any consideration of putting in any groins to help hold it in.

Consultant Halloway stated not now, as those were evaluated in phase 1 and some of the alternatives that were considered groins included offshore break waters and reefs, etc. He stated that those will work but they are also costly because of the amount of rock and material required in the structures.

Vice Mayor Wright assumed he was in active communication with the Coastal Commission in developing these plans.

Consultant Holloway agreed, stating that they had several meetings with them throughout this last phase.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if they gave due consideration to the redirection of the wave energy belt from the new base of the pier and from the change of the shoreline on the south end. He asked what that wave energy will do on either side.

Consultant Holloway stated that is part of the reason we want to keep the alignment as it is today on the north side of the pier. On the south side, because there is more persistent beach there, there is not as much wave reflection off the structure. By pulling that structure back, he thinks it is going to have very little effect on wave reflection south of the pier.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if there was any consideration to the future of making a bigger base so 50 years from now, or if sea level rise occurs faster, we have an option to top it an extra foot.

Consultant Holloway stated that there has been thought that, ideally, if we had permission and permits to elevate the wall in the future, that we would be modifying just the concrete structure on top, not having the reef drill more piles, etc.

Dep. Director Yip referenced the sand retention/reef concepts in public comment and pointed to the alternative analysis report (Section 3.5, pages 25 and 26) on the BBIRP website for the major deliverables on phase one project. In the report, it has a cost analysis for the beach nourishment plus sand retention of $111 million with life cycle cost of $235 million. Roughly, the reef or sand retention structures can cost upwards of $80 to $100 million. In our 35% basis cost estimate, the sand nourishment first placement is only around $14 million. It costs $80 to $100 million to put something in there to protect it. As Consultant Holloway mentioned, the upper end of it is on page 26 on how long it will last. The sand nourishment can last up to ten years. If you have a retention structure, it might extend it double, but it does not prevent sand from leaving.

Vice Mayor Wright asked about axillary benefits to having a reef as opposed to not having a reef, such as capturing some of the wave energy further out before it comes in and therefore putting less pressure on the sea wall structure doing less damage to our coast.

Dep. Director Yip referred to a study we are doing with the Army Corps because we have our CAP 204 study with the Army Corps to place dredge material and sand nourishment on Beach Boulevard. In one of the studies, with installation of the sand retention structure reef, although it retains somewhat on the north end, it prevents some of it from going to the south end of the site.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if that is or is not a temporary condition, as there is a sand river that travels down the coast perpetually.

2.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 January 12, 2026
Dep. Director Yip stated he would have to confirm with them on how, but they made it sound like it would just prevent sand from traveling. You will get more in the north but there would be less.

Mayor Boles referred to the north wall having about five years left and asked about percentage of the length and how much have we replaced.

Dep. Director Yip stated it is mainly the northern wall that has the breaches, and the main reason is because it does not have some foundation structure below it. Once the bottom of the wall gets undermined, all the soil washes out. The panels themselves have not necessarily been replaced.

When it washes out, we first plug the bottom of the hole and then plug the bottom with concrete and then we fill the rest of it with slurry mix. We will not be able to reinforce because there are shoring requirements for people to go into the hole. After it is all tiered, we put asphalt on the top.

That is the extent of the repairs we have done since 2016.

Mayor Boles asked how much of the length of the north wall has been repaired in this way.

Dep. Director Yip stated roughly 12 breaches ranging around 15 feet wide, 15 feet in length.

Mayor Boles referred to the timeline two years for environmental review and permitting and two years for construction drawing and permitting at the minimum, but the construction period is not included in that either. She thought, if the sea wall has five years left, it will not last.

Dep. Director Yip stated we can continue doing these spot repairs, which roughly range over $60,000 every time it breaches, but we do not know if there is going to be a big one that will require panels in the future. We talked about phasing the project because it is so large and possibly doing the north wall first as it is in worse condition.

Mayor Boles thought, in regards to funding difficulties, it might make sense at some point to look at a remediation temporary fix for the whole length of the north wall. She thought it was cheaper do to things as a larger project than piecemeal.

Mayor Boles then opened public comments.

Jim Kremer, Pacifica, stated he has been involved in the City’s coastal planning as a resident since 2017. He shared his skeptical thoughts on the City’s vision of long-term coastal planning and asked for alternatives to hard armor for the infrastructure protection, considered additional forces threatening new wall failure, and highlighted the Clarendon Gap as a weak link.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, stated she aligned herself with Mr. Kremer’s comments. She referred to Mr. Holloway’s noting the tension and balancing input from the community with an engineering project. She emphasized the importance of nature-based solutions and reviewing solutions for the whole of Pacifica.

Kimberly Finale, Pacifica, emphasized the importance of nature-based solutions and shared concerns about funding for Phase 2A. She stated we need long-term planning to address the pending failure of the seawall.

Tygarjas Bigstyck, Pacifica, referenced the concept of the living reef as a mitigation for the wave impacts. He thought it would make sense to have an analysis of the methodology and its cost and spoke in favor of nature-based solutions as well as a holistic view.

2.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 January 12, 2026
Mayor Boles closed public comments.

Dep. Director Yip stated that most grants request to see some nature-based solutions but the main reason this time no new projects were awarded for the past fiscal year.

Mayor Boles asked if Consultant Holloway can talk about dunes as part of the project and explain more of the terminology.

Consultant Holloway stated nature-based shorelines are popular and are the first option for shoreline protection. The main problem is that they need space. Nature-based solutions on an open coast means using sand, cobble, and dunes to provide a buffer against coastal hazards.

He stated that sand cobbles fluctuate widely, such as the beach changes on a seasonal basis at the south end, and that is the kind of space we need for that solution which we do not have. He stated that, at the south end, we pulled the wall back and there is potential for a nature-based solution there. We can plant dunes and try to vegetate them but he is hesitant to commit to a restored dune area; if that is the primary public access and recreational area, it may not be compatible with the restored dune. He stated it is a tradeoff. He does not want to mislead anyone by using the term nature-based solutions; thus they used beach nourishment which will be the most viable. Due to wave energy, the cobble was going to need to be big and look a lot less like cobble and a lot more like boulders. If that is the shoreline, it will be hard to walk on, enter the water with boulders rolling around, etc. He stated that those were some of the tradeoffs we struggled with in considering nature-based shorelines at this location.

Mayor Boles stated that the detailed description referenced cobble on the south but they are 12- 18 inches and not walkable. She was on the cobble beach at the harbor recently restored and Coastal Commissioners went out and were proud of that but they could see the rocks that were little and they can walk on them. If that beach is going to be usable as a walking surface to the public, the sand nourishment is a critical part of that.

Consultant Holloway stated that their conclusion at this phase is coarse sand is going to be the best natural material to place there.

Mayor Boles concluded that we do not know if that sand is available as it is part of the Army Corps study. She stated that, in the budget now, we have one beach nourishment of about $14 million and, if we need it again in 3-10 years, it will be a continual cost.

Dep. Director Yip agreed, stating that the 35% cost estimate is only for one initial placement for $14 million; however, our goal is to include close to $30 million of operation maintenance to get funded for that so we can replenish the sand several rounds. He stated this $30 million is on top of the $80 million construction project.

City Manager Woodhouse stated he was going to comment from the perspective of funding and funding raising strategy. He stated that it is true that, in many grant funding requirements today, there is an emphasis on nature-based solutions. However, there is a lot of dialogue in the State about neighborhood-specific solutions that fit what that neighborhood needs. San Francisco just had a sea wall project approved. The decision is driven by the engineering needs, the infrastructure protection needs, and what the neighborhood needs. You do not design a project based on how you think you will get funding; you design a project for what it needs and you go after that funding and figure it out. That is part of the perspective on this as well.

2.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 January 12, 2026
Mayor Boles understands that, adding that with San Francisco, they are funding it themselves.

She asked if oyster reefs or building habitat into seawalls was more favorable to the Coastal Commission and what kind of input have we gotten from the Coastal Commission regarding how to guide the design in a more favorable way.

Consultant Holloway recalls from Coastal Commission staff that it is mostly concerns about hard armoring and conflicts with Coastal Act policies. The good news is that much of that will resolve with the LCLUP as it provides an allowance for protection in certain areas and resolved what is existing development and what is not. He thinks Coastal Commission appreciates that the promenade and access to the pier are important coastal resources. They have not spent a lot of time talking about concrete materials and if there is a way to make anything more nature friendly rather than just rock and concrete.

Mayor Boles stated our community is very interested in whatever those options are. She then referred to Mr. Bigstyck asking about the offshore reef. OneShoreline is looking at taking on that project to look at the design and modeling and talking to UC Santa Cruz about doing some work and it is sounding positive that they are able to get some funding. It could be something that helps dissipate that wave energy and holds the sand in place a little longer and could be a benefit in addition to the work.

Mayor Boles and Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to Mr. Kremer’s questions for feedback.

Consultant Holloway stated pressure on the back side of the wall is important and the structural engineers are looking at what is the water level we can expect. Given the amount of overtopping that we would expect in a rainfall event and cracks on the promenade that would develop, the assumption is that it is saturated up to the surface, hence we assume the worst case, which is the best way to do it. The wall will be designed with a drainage layer behind it with some weepholes to ideally relieve that pressure.

Councilmember Bier asked how many grants have we applied for in the past year.

Dep. Director Yip stated, in terms of grant applications, there are not many available and we have only had two for this project. In terms of exploring, we have a grant consult called Townsend and we meet up with them every month to discuss grant opportunities. We have to make sure that we are going to be competitive before devoting resources to go after some of these grants.

Councilmember Bier knows how hard it is to apply for funding and she knows how hard it is to not receive that funding and she thanked them.

Vice Mayor Wright asked City Attorney Kenyon if we have any experience on what happens when the ocean takes any of our houses and does that cost us any money.

City Attorney Kenyon stated that it does raise legal issues. The biggest exposure is inverse condemnation. It depends on how the overflow or topping and what was created with the event.

If it destroys a street, there is a concern and the property no longer has access and a concern that the property has been inversely condemned. There are concerns to why that may not be the case. That is the biggest legal issue she can see now with a catastrophic event of that nature.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if we have spent any money on legal fees addressing any of these kind of things or just one property.

2.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 January 12, 2026
City Attorney Kenyon stated that we had two properties that eroded the land around it and have fallen into the ocean and the property owner could not afford to raise the building. She added that the City had to step in in order to save the beach and the environment, the City had it demolished.

She stated that owner went into bankruptcy and we did not collect those.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if we spent money on legal fees and doing the reclamation.

City Attorney Kenyon responded affirmatively.

Vice Mayor Wright assumed that, in the event we were to abandon doing something to protect the shoreline, it would be more expensive than the sea wall. He is in favor of doing a reef offshore to mitigate some of that wave energy coming in as a more nature-based solution. It would then allow the river of sand to continue to flow from the north down to the south. He would not mind if there were some groins to slow it down on the way to build up more sand on the beach to give us more protection from those waves in addition to the sea wall to protect us from those big storm events and buy us time to get those nature-based solutions in place at the same time. He asked if we have considered applying for funding that would include something like the reef in addition to the sea wall or do we see it as two separate things.

Dep. Director Yip stated, in terms of the analysis of the reef, there were extensive studies done in Phase1 and, in terms of the alternatives, this is not the end. We are going to have to do it again when we get into environmental documentation alternatives as part of EIRs. When we do the Coastal Commission permitting, we will have to look at our alternatives again. He stated that saying it is not part of the project now does not mean it is not going to be part of the project. Right now, with our CAP 204 studies with the Army Corps, they are looking into reefs as they can do shoreline improvements. The dredging is a main component that has to be part of the CAP 204 but we do have additional funds that can fund shoreline improvement. The max is $15 million and we are unlikely to get a reef from the CAP 204 but they will study it; we will have additional studies and it is not going to be the end of the reef discussion yet. If we can get it funded with the grant, we will be happy to apply for it. Now, we need some momentum to get the construction funded and we lost momentum by losing the BRIC grant that is $15 50 million. He stated there are close to 30 structures that are directly fronting Beach Boulevard. In terms of the utilities and the cost and everything in the ground there, that was part of a no project alternative in Phase 1. The number for the life of the project can exceed close to $243 million and that is why we are proceeding with the wall as the wall is $80 million and there is a benefit cost. It is there to justify the project and that does not include property acquisition and eminent domain and legal fees as needed to acquire some of these properties.

Vice Mayor Wright thought we would lose millions in property tax revenue over ad infinitum on 30 properties. He referred to staff talking about cost benefit analysis, etc., and he is thinking about the reef as being a solution that is going to prevent us from having to spend $14 million to renourish time and time again. He asked if building a self-sustaining project once is better than repeating the same old thing again and again that is not working.

Dep. Director Yip thought it might be helpful to see the graph from the alternative analysis, which shows we are only going to reduce the amount of the sand nourishment by 50%. If the cost of sand nourishment is $14 million, and if it costs you $80 million to do a reef, you can basically do close to 5-6 sand nourishments for that cost. If they last for ten years, you have 50-60 years versus building the sand nourishment with the retention. You still have to do sand nourishment because the sand is still going to travel off the northern side and you still have to place sand there.

There is also the wave energy in this area that is incredibly high and that was something that the

2.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 January 12, 2026
Army Corps commented when they visited our site. The wave energy is incredible out there as they are crashing onto the pier and damaging the concrete structure. Due to the wave energy, it does not make the reef as cost-effective because they may not last as well, and that is to be studied again as we approach these other phases.

Councilmember Espinosa wondered what we can do now that is not that expensive that can save us or at least repair or not get worse. She emphasized the issue is funding.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked the City Manager what we spent on doing something this year so far on the wall.

City Manager Woodhouse clarified the life of the seawall is not only five years. There are breaches, we repair them, and those repaired spots are stronger. The concept that there is just five years left in the wall is a misconception about the wall. The 2016 storms and breaches tore out part of the wall and that has been repaired and we have not had any problems in that exact repair spot. Mayor Boles asked a good question about what linear footage have been bolstered up in repairs, and we can look at that and see what the percentage of it is. Since 2016, we have had to spend $7 million in breaches of the sea wall and repairs. We can continue to do that but we need to be working very actively through these phases on a large, complicated infrastructure project to get to the point of replacement of the wall, as well as all the other aspects of the project.

There is no magical solution to prevent the overtopping and breaches that might happen. There are some concepts about some flooding, plastic tubings that can be put out on the beach, etc.

The question is whether it is going to handle the intensity of some of the storms that we receive.

He did not think there is any easy, immediate solution, but we are doing what we can do and it is working to maintain and protect until this critical project comes to fruition.

Councilmember Espinosa thinks that we are okay now and we will repair things as we go.

Mayor Boles thought we had not yet gotten money back from FEMA for some sand issues a couple of years ago and she asked if these emergencies are something we are paying out from the Disaster Fund or are we able to get reimbursement from federal or state agencies.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that most of the breaches do not fall into the emergency FEMA reimbursement. There was the one storm where we have numerous claims that are unresolved, but mostly it is paid out of the Disaster Accounting Fund.

Dep. Director Yip stated there was a question about cost per breach, and for this past winter, we had three breaches that cost roughly total $180,000 for the contractor who worked on it. These are becoming more frequent since 2016. We have had 12 breaches in 2016, but they are averaging around three a year for the past three years and most are within the last few years.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if that did not include any staff regular time or overtime.

Dep. Director Yip agreed, stating it is purely the contractor.

Vice Mayor Wright asked if it is typically overtime we are paying to the staff for any of those mitigation issues.

Dep. Director Yip responded affirmatively.

2.a
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 January 12, 2026
Councilmember Beckmeyer stated we have done the work because of the conditions of the wall.

We have studied it and we know the north wall is not a true seawall and she is curious to hear more about the possibility of phasing. She thinks we need to do this project and we need to plan for the longer future. Getting this project done gives us the opportunity to plan for the longer future.

Right now, there is no support for us and, with the idea of letting go 30 properties, we cannot buy them out. There has been talk about a project through the State for a buyout but it did not go anywhere. She thinks we need to be reactive when things come around that are useful and beneficial and we need to give our input to the State legislature who are working on these things from our on-the-ground experience. For her, the storm treatment built into this project is an improvement over what we have now to help get that water out. Now, our system is not ready for this and doing this project is how we get that taken care of and how we close the Clarendon Gap.

She knows we have looked at quite a few alternatives and, in terms of cost benefits, this is the best one we came up with. She stated that it is discouraging to her that the funding is abysmal because we need it now as it is an emergency.

Councilmember Bier looked forward, as we move forward with the Climate Action and Resilience Plan and looking at nature-based solutions, talking about the reefs and more. We do not have the funding but that does not mean that we cannot see what we can do. The information brought to us about the reefs was interesting and helpful. She knows it costs money to do that, but she looks forward to those conversations.

Mayor Boles referred to the projections, as she is trying to understand the basis of the project design, and they mentioned two feet of sea level rise which was the intermediate OPC guidance.

Consultant Holloway stated that it depends as those are curves. He stated that the intermediate curve represents the likely range of sea level rise. He stated that with intermediate high, things are worse, and there is one above that, high, which is the worst case.

Mayor Boles asked if he was designing to the intermediate projection which starts to be a problem in about 2075.

Consultant Holloway stated the idea is that, on day one, we will have the most likely range of sea level rise over 50 years covered and, if we end up being on the higher curve, we have steps we can go through and may accept the risk of more frequent floods. We will learn a lot over the next 30 years and we can make a more informed decision in the future to adapt to higher sea level.

Mayor Boles has been hearing at the State level that they are encouraging infrastructure projects to be designed to the intermediate high and not just the intermediate. She knows there is a tradeoff between the views and the height of the wall, but in case we are at the intermediate high in 50 years, the project would not be designed for that at this point.

Consultant Holloway stated it is also the combination of storm events with sea level rise. We can also look at a lesser design event and tolerate less sea level rise but, during that big event, we will have more flooding.

Mayor Boles stated, besides general sea level rise, we are seeing increased storms and increased storm intensity. Just in Pacifica, overtopping happened in the last three years because we are getting more of these storms, which is part of climate change, like a warmer ocean holding more water and bringing these increased storms. She asked if that has been included in these projections and planning or is that not defined in the data and science at the State level.

2.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 14 January 12, 2026
Consultant Holloway stated it is not reflected in the OPC so this is solely a sea level rise focused document. Our analysis does account for the extreme wave activity that we have observed recently. He knows there have been wave height records that have been broken in recent years and there are some very energetic storms.

Mayor Boles stated, besides the flooding, it overtopping is also a hazard. She is trying to get a sense for the community of what we can expect and how much are we fixing and what hazards are still there in this area even after this is built.

Consultant Holloway agreed that we can expect splash over the wall during those big events, even if we raise it up four feet. We are trying to prevent the green water, where a whole wave comes up on the wall and carries all that debris, sand, and gravel, in addition to the flooding.

Mayor Boles stated that we are fixing the north wall s where most of our issues are, but we are seeing more flooding in the south end. If we end up doing a phased approach, she asked if there has been any analysis of whether the south wall can be increased in height.

Consultant Holloway stated that we have not looked at an interim condition where the north wall is replaced and the south wall may be improved. The main issue is that the north wall does not have a foundation.

Mayor Boles stated that the drainage north of the pier is gravity drainage out the wall the way it is now, but bigger drains that can hold more capacity. South of the wall at the Clarendon Gap, we were talking about still using the existing pipe which is sometimes below sea level. She asked what we are planning there in terms of water management now.

Consultant Holloway stated referred to the Storm Drain Master Plan that identified a need for a pump station there eventually.

Dep. Director Yip stated that the Clarendon Pump Station is a project in our Capital Improvement Program that needs funding. There is a temporary pump out there now and it is the lowest spot in the City and, during big storms, staff are pumping water out.

Mayor Boles added it has very limited capacity. She stated that sand levels vary over the course of the year and we see this more on the south wall. She stated that it seems that the levels have been higher the last couple of years. She asked what kind of height difference are included in the designs now.

Consultant Holloway has seen, in some of those extreme events, larger waves and high water levels which will put sand higher up on the beach. That is the beach’s natural way of dealing with those events. The typical seasonal variation is big winter waves move sand off shore and small summer waves push it back on shore, but there are interesting dynamics that happen during those big events. The design would have the bottom of the wall at 20 or below and then the top of it at 28 at the south end so we would have the ability to accommodate the varying sand levels.

Mayor Boles was pleased to see stairs and asked about handicapped access.

Consultant Holloway stated, at the south end, we have a ramp built in to that central picnic beach access area but we do not have a ramp going out on the sand. That could be something we add.

Mayor Boles asked about vehicle access out to the beach and beyond the wall.

2.a
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 15 January 12, 2026
Consultant Holloway stated a lot of the armor stone can be replaced from a crane or a piece of equipment from the promenade side. If a vehicle had to get through there, we could look at sizing one of those beach access ways 12 feet instead of 6 feet which is an option.

Mayor Boles thought that might be helpful. She thinks, in the past, we used to manage the sand levels with vehicles. She does not know if that maintenance is required as part of the design.

Dep. Director Yip stated that we can coordinate with GHD on vehicle access out there and get the Coastal Development Permit to move sand around.

Mayor Boles referred to the next phase and asked about a cost estimate for the services and how much funding for their work in the environmental permitting.

Consultant Holloway stated that we have a proposal for all phases, approximately $2.5 million for each phase for the environmental.

Mayor Boles asked if we will be modeling the wall and understanding the sand and nourishment cycles in a little bit more detail as part of the next phase.

Consultant Holloway does not know how much we will get into that with the environmental document but, with permitting, we will. There will be more advanced analysis.

Mayor Boles stated that, on the north end, she wanted to make sure there was still vehicle and fire department access to 1567 Beach Boulevard (a vacant site with a current application).

Consultant Holloway stated that we made sure there is enough room there for vehicle access.

We have not reviewed it with the fire department but they are aware that it is a need there. As we finalize the line, we will have to get those dimensions and make sure they are all up to code.

Mayor Boles asked, in terms of budget, if those numbers are in today’s dollars or projected five years down the road when we would be building it.

Consultant Holloway does not think there is escalation to the construction phase.

Mayor Boles concluded that those numbers will go up. She knows there was talk about the existing south wall perhaps remaining in place and building this over it, but she sees on the current drawings that we are proposing to take it out. She thought it would be helpful to see the existing walls with the new wall in the section dashed in. She also referenced the new Local Coastal Land Use Plan and some shoreline protection of the special shoreline resiliency areas that are for a period of 20 years. The sea wall has a longer life than that, and she asked if we they have discussed this with the Coastal Commission since the LCLUP was approved.

Consultant Holloway stated that they haven’t met with Coastal Commission since then, but it is something we they will work through as part of the CDP and what it will look like in the future, sea level rise, risks and what different scenarios look like.

Mayor Boles referenced the Coastal Commission, in approving the SSRA, seeing those as a way to give us time to do the long-term planning. It is not just that we are building a sea wall to protect those, but we still have to look at moving those as a longer-term plan. She thanked him for his expertise and appreciated him being here tonight.

2.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 16 January 12, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright moved to accept the report; seconded by Councilmember Bier.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

9. 2026 City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments
PROPOSED ACTION: Review the list of City Council Liaison and Committee Assignments, make any modifications for the calendar year 2026, and approve the final list.

City Clerk Sarah Coffey presented the staff report.

Mayor Boles added there was an ad hoc subcommittee formed with her and Vice Mayor Wright for the review of the Beach Boulevard hotel proposal.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Calvin Chan, Pacifica, stated he was the vice president of Pacifica’s Youth Advisory Board and Terra Nova Student Council, and is one of many youth who cares deeply about our city, its future, and our youth community. He requested a City Council liaison to the Youth Advisory Board.

Kimberly Finale, Pacifica, stated, following Mr. Chan’s comment, she fully supported having a youth liaison to the City Council and the positive impacts it would have.

Tygarjas Bigstyck, Pacifica, stated that he thoroughly echoed the last two speakers.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

City Clerk Coffey stated that the Youth Advisory Board meetings are held every second and fourth Wednesday from 6:00 pm to 7:00 p.m. at the Community Center.

The City Council made the following changes: Colma Creek Flood Control Citizens Advisory Committee primary changed from Boles to Wright and alternate changed from Wright to Boles; North Coast County Water District primary changed from Wright to Beckmeyer and alternate changed from Beckmeyer to Wright; Peninsula Clean Energy JPA alternate changed from Wright to Espinosa; Economic Development Committee primary changed from Espinosa and Bier to Espinosa only and alternate added for Bier; Open Space Parkland Advisory Committee primary changed from Wright to Bier; and Youth Advisory Board primary added for Bier on the 2nd Wednesdays and Wright on the 4th Wednesdays.

AGENCY Council
Representative(s)
Council
Alternate
ABAG General Assembly Delegate WRIGHT BECKMEYER
Airport Community Roundtable BOLES BECKMEYER

2.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 17 January 12, 2026
C/CAG Representative BECKMEYER WRIGHT
Colma Creek Flood Control Citizens Advisory
Committee WRIGHT BOLES
Emergency Services Council SMC BOLES WRIGHT
Fog Fest Committee Liaison BIER
Housing Endowment and Regional Trust
(HEART) - Member Agency Committee (MAC) BIER BOLES
North County Fire Authority JPA ESPINOSA &
WRIGHT
North Coast County Water District (NCCWD) BECKMEYER WRIGHT Pacifica Community Television ESPINOSA BIER
Pacific Beach Coalition BOLES ESPINOSA
Pacifica Resource Center WRIGHT BOLES
Pacifica School Volunteers BIER BECKMEYER
Peninsula Clean Energy JPA BOLES ESPINOSA
Peninsula Congestion Relief Alliance
(Commute.org) BIER BECKMEYER
SMC JPA Advanced Life Support / Pre-Hospital
Emergency WRIGHT BOLES
SMC Library JPA - Gov. Board BIER BECKMEYER
APPOINTED BY OTHER AGENCIES:
* Cal Cities Environmental Quality Policy
Committee BOLES n/a
*Cal Cities Coastal Cities Group (CCG)
Leadership Committee, North Central
Representative (through Dec. 2026)
BECKMEYER n/a
* C/CAG Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee
BIER &
WRIGHT n/a
* C/CAG Legislative Committee WRIGHT n/a

2.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 18 January 12, 2026
* C/CAG Resource Management & Climate
Protection Committee (RMCP) BECKMEYER n/a
* Housing Endowment and Regional Trust
(HEART) - Regular Member Board of Directors BIER n/a
* Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO) WRIGHT n/a
* Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO) Budget Committee WRIGHT n/a

CITY OF PACIFICA COMMITTEES /
COMMISSIONS:

Beautification Advisory Committee ESPINOSA BECKMEYER
Climate Action & Resilience Committee TBD TBD
Economic Development Committee ESPINOSA BIER
Emergency Preparedness & Safety Comm. BOLES none appointed Library Advisory Committee BECKMEYER BOLES
Open Space Parkland Advisory Committee BIER none appointed Youth Advisory Board (YAB) BIER (2nd Wed.) &
WRIGHT (4th Wed.)
Councilmember Bier moved to accept the amended list; seconded by Vice Mayor Wright.

RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Bier stated, as a member of Pacifica’s Council and a neighbor in the community, she acknowledged fear and uncertainty are present and our greatest responsibility is to care for one another and protect our most vulnerable neighbors. Pacifica has always been a place where people can look out for each other, where compassion matters, and where we lead with our values rather than fear. Across the country, people are marching and peacefully protesting the actions of those who hold the highest level of power. These acts of civic engagement are rooted in love, hope, and a desire for justice. In Pacifica, creating spaces for safety, love, and support matters more than anything else. Our words and our actions should help people feel grounded, welcome and protected. She encouraged our community to pause for youth and choose connection over panic and be thoughtful about what we share, how we speak and how we show up for one another.

2.a
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 19 January 12, 2026
Protecting our neighbors means checking in, offering reassurance and committing to calm factbased communication. Pacifica is strongest when we stand together in dignity and care so let us continue to be a community where everyone belongs, where peaceful expression is expected and where love guides us through uncertainty.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that Supervisor Ray Mueller is having an Open House on Thursday, January 15, from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. as well as the Fog Fest check distribution on Wednesday, January 14, at 6:00 p.m.

Mayor Boles referenced the Sheriff’s meeting on January 13 at 6:00 pm.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that Mary Ann Nihart passed after their last Council meeting.

She was a powerhouse for Pacifica on this dais and was a leader for this neighborhood in Sharp Park and, especially at the County level, she was a beacon and chaired C/CAG for three years.

There is a memorial on Saturday, January 31, at the Community Center auditorium.

Mayor Boles stated that, at the next meeting, we will have a proper proclamation to celebrate her.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Woodhouse stated at our next meeting he will introduce our new Economic and Housing Development Manager Gretchen Heckman and Dep. Director of Community Development Michael Christensen.

ADJOURN
Mayor Boles adjourned the meeting at 9:59 p.m., in memory of Mary Ann Nihart.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor

2.a
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Attachment A: Minutes of 1-12-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (as amended) (6162 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETING
January 26, 2026 (MONDAY)
www.cityofpacifica.org
Mayor Christine Boles called the meeting to order on January 26, 2026 at 5:00 PM 5:00 PM - CLOSED SESSION
00a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 and paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9: One Case. 6:00 PM OPEN SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Boles reconvened the meeting at 6:07 p.m.

Staff Present: Kevin Woodhouse, City Manager; Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney; Denise Bazzano, Asst. City Attorney; Yulia Carter, Asst. City Manager; Scott Leslie, PB&R Director; Maria Sarasua, Police Chief; Melissa Tigbao, PW Director (Zoom); Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director; Marisol Gómez, Finance & Administrative Services Director; Gretchen Heckman, Economic & Housing Development Manager; Roland Yip, PW Deputy Director (Field Services/Engineering); Daniel Patten, Interim PW Deputy Director (Wastewater); Michael Christensen, Community Development Deputy Director; Matt Kelly, Project Manager; Katelyn Snodgrass, Assoc. Planner; Samuel Koosed, Civic Well Sparks Fellow; Sarah Coffey, City Clerk; Emily La, Dep. City Clerk.

Reading of Land Acknowledgment
Mayor Boles read the Land Acknowledgment.

2.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 2 January 26, 2026
Salute to the Flag led by Vice Mayor Wright
Closed Session Report
Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated there was no reportable action.

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
A. Presentation: San Mateo County Libraries (SMCL) Annual Report Mayor Boles introduced the presenter of the San Mateo County Libraries Annual Report, Pacifica Libraries Manager Hillary Ake.

Pacifica Libraries Manager Ake presented the annual report, beginning with the history of the libraries over the years, their past programs, and future strategic plans. She also thanked the City and City staff for their support and library volunteers for all they do as well as citizens who are library members who support the libraries’ work.

Mayor Boles thanked Pacifica Libraries Manager Ake for educating them for all that they do to support Pacificans.

Councilmember Bier felt the library was the best place for so many things and helps people in so many different ways. She knows they are provided many things by the library and she is grateful, especially the art programs they have.

Vice Mayor Wright also thanked her. He wondered what was the best way if volunteers want to get involved with the library.

Pacifica Libraries Manager Ake stated that they can visit their website or stop by the branch.

Vice Mayor Wright asked what the library does for visually impaired people.

Pacifica Libraries Manager Ake stated that they have some accessibility tools on their computers at the library, i.e., zoom text, screen readers, able to access Braille collection, etc.

Vice Mayor Wright also asked about how the community has been receiving the library Outpost.

Pacifica Libraries Manager Ake stated that it has been great. It holds up to 300 books at a time, but often a quarter of the machine is filled with holds for people to pick up and can stop by 24/7 to get their holds. She stated it has been very well utilized.

Councilmember Espinosa stated that there are two other services that she enjoys, the mobile library which is a great way to let people know that they are there, and the digital courses they have online. She thanked them for that.

Councilmember Beckmeyer thanked Libraries Manager Ake for being in Pacifica and she echoed the Mayor’s welcome. She highlighted the newspaper database through our public library and you can use your library card to use it to find local papers to national papers. She asked if there are set times or drop in if people need help with their electronic devices, such as downloading Ebooks.

2.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 3 January 26, 2026
Pacifica Libraries Manager Ake stated that you can stop by the library anytime if you need help with technology and they are launching a new program series called digital literacy hub and they will have a dedicated staff member to help with 1-on-1 help for 15 hours every week.

Mayor Boles thanked Libraries Manager Ake for being present. She thinks she is doing a wonderful job with her outreach and being in all the places now to educate people about all the libraries’ resources.

There were no public comments.

B. Proclamation in Honor / Memory of Mary Ann Nihart
Councilmember Beckmeyer read the proclamation honoring former Mayor and Councilmember Mary Ann Nihart.

Mayor Boles stated it was an amazing list of her accomplishments over decades.

Councilmember Bier stated that Ms. Nihart was such a force in our community. She first met her when they started the Partnership for a Safe and Healthy Pacifica and were working on alcohol policy and encouraged youth to voice their thoughts. She stated that Ms. Nihart challenged her to start working on prescription drugs and she has been doing that ever since. She stated she was an asset for our community and she misses her.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that Councilmembers aspire to Ms. Nihart’s inspirational dedication to public service.

Councilmember Espinosa thought Ms. Nihart was very real from her presentations.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated that Ms. Nihart was a powerhouse. She was an inspiration and did it all. Councilmember Beckmeyer did not realize until she was on Council what it takes to be a councilmember and what it takes to be a councilmember like Mary Ann Nihart, which is the next level. They were lucky to have her as long as they did.

Mayor Boles stated that she had the pleasure of meeting Mary Ann Nihart three times, first after she got elected at a Council of Cities meeting. Ms. Nihart received a standing ovation from people all over the county as she did a lot to advance policies and programs for us regionally. In January 2025, Mayor Boles reached out to her to invite her to talk about some of the difficulties they were having on Council and it ended up being a whole discussion of some of the things she had started and was working on. They were trying for decades to redevelop Manor Plaza, and they recaptured that and moved it forward. Between those times, Pacificans Care honored her with People Who Care Award in 2023. In the midst of that, Ms. Nihart came over to her and told her that she was doing a great job. She thought, in the middle of her celebration and recovery, she was still thinking about Pacifica and everything she can do to improve Pacifica. Thus, she will be sorely missed.

Councilmember Beckmeyer stated there is the Celebration of Life for Mary Ann Nihart at the Pacifica Community Center on January 31 from 1:00 to 4:00pm and all are welcome.

Mayor Boles opened public comments.

2.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 4 January 26, 2026
Robine Runneals, Pacifica, stated she was a 40-year neighbor of Ms. Nihart in West Sharp Park, and she expressed appreciation for them acknowledging all the amazing things she accomplished. She shared some of their interactions and they became fast friends and she helped her get involved in some local activities. She felt they did a wonderful tribute to her.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, shared thoughts on how she worked together with Ms. Nihart. She shared details on Ms. Nihart’s passion about Pacifica in all aspects of her work and how she was a wonderful voice for Pacifica.

Tygarjas Bigstyck, Pacifica, shared that, if not for Ms. Nihart, he would not have spent as much time speaking at Council meetings and shared his thoughts on what she left behind that would benefit all Pacificans, including bonding with other cities in the county.

Dinah Verby, Pacifica, thanked Council for the proclamation. She shared Ms. Nihart’s enthusiastic involvement with her on various issues, which was contagious, especially the Pedro Point Headlands designated as a priority conservation area with ABAG.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Woodhouse wanted to move Staff Communications to introduce two new key staff members: Economic & Housing Development Manager Gretchen Heckman and Deputy Director of Community Development Michael Christensen.

Economic & Housing Development Manager Heckman stated for several weeks she has been working closely with the City Manager’s Office and other city employees, consultants, and departments to get up to speed on existing and future economic development plans for the City.

She stated that she comes from San Francisco after ten years working in the former Redevelopment Agency as a housing specialist and then in project management overseeing the Mission Bay North and South Redevelopment project areas. Prior to that, she worked in non-profit real estate development, including affordable housing development and is happy to have landed in this beautiful and engaged community and looks forward to working closely with Council and continuing the great work it has done along with staff in the past couple of years.

Community Development Deputy Director Christensen stated he is honored to join the City as Deputy Director of Community Development starting officially today. He came after spending about a decade with San Francisco where he worked as both a planner with their Planning Department for half the time and as a Project Manager with the City Administrator’s office for the second half of his time. In Pacifica, he is focusing on three priorities: first, support our Planning team and Planning Commission to deliver excellent service to the community; second, modernize our technology system to make our processes more efficient and transparent to both staff and the public; and third, ensure department operates as a true partner to residents, businesses and developers navigating and understanding our planning and environmental working processes.

He stated that what he sees most of Pacifica is the opportunity to work in a community-oriented city where local government can have real tangible impact on people’s daily lives. Having spent his career in a much larger jurisdiction, he is excited for the chance to work more directly with residents and see the results of our work shaping this beautiful coastal community. He looks forward to working with all of Council and is grateful for the warm welcome he has already received from Director Updegrave, City staff, and community at large.

2.b
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 5 January 26, 2026

CONSENT CALENDAR
There were no public comments.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

1. Approval of Minutes
PROPOSED ACTION: Move to approve the minutes for the November 17, 2025 City Council Special Meeting and the November 24, 2025 City Council Special and Regular Meeting.

2. Notice of Completion for the Civic Center Campus Facilities Improvement Project PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Civic Center Campus Facilities Improvement Project.

3. Notice of Completion for the Linda Mar Pump Station Upgrade Project PROPOSED ACTION: Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica to:

A. Increase the Linda Mar Pump Station Upgrade Project construction contingency budget by $35,597 (3%) to the total contingency of $172,597 (13%), bringing the total construction authority to $1,542,597; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the close-out change order for the project;
B. Increase the Linda Mar Pump Station Upgrade Project engineering services during construction (ESDC) contingency budget by $23,000 (18%) to the total contingency of (28%), bringing the total ESDC authority to $164,460; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the close-out change order for the project; and C. Accept completion and direct the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Linda Mar Pump Station Upgrade Project; and authorize the City Manager to release the retention funds to the contractor.

4. Approve Naming of the Existing Switchback Section of the Rockaway Multipurpose Trail Segment which Connects Rockaway Beach to Pacifica State Beach Park as the “Lynn Adams Trail”.

PROPOSED ACTION: Approve naming of the existing switchback section of the Rockaway multipurpose trail which connects Rockaway Beach to Pacifica State Beach Park as the “Lynn Adams Trail,” per the recommendation of the City Manager, and in compliance with the City's “City Facilities/Property Naming Policy”.

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE POSTED AGENDA
Cynthia Knowles, Pacifica, stated she was previously on the PB&R Commission. She stated, in 2020, they presented the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan to Council and recently learned about C/CAG funding available for bike and pedestrian projects. She asked if we are considering applying for a grant and which priorities have come out of the Master Plan and if we are working with the PB&R Commission for that grant.

2.b
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 6 January 26, 2026
Bryan Reinero, Pacifica, asked about the list of permitted STRs published to the City’s website under the new STR ordinance, how many STRs in the non-coastal zone have been issued their QR code signs, and how many STR permit revocation hearings that City has conducted.

Mark Stechbart, Pacifica, asked about the compliance of STRs who were re-issued permits, the code requirements understood by the average citizen, and the revocation status of 1987 Beach Blvd. He raised concerns about unpermitted STR addresses and lack of transparency in the City.

Caitlin Quinn, Pacifica, shared her thoughts on the City’s lack of transparency on the STRs and asked Council to fix this.

Mayor Boles closed Public Comments.

Mayor Boles asked City Manager or staff to answer some of these questions on STRs and when the permit and inspection information will be added to the website.

City Manager Woodhouse stated staff has been working diligently on the review and renewal process for this ordinance and all of the inspections of the units that are required. He stated we are on target to complete that by the end of the month. In December, staff gave a detailed update written status report to Council and we will be doing that once we complete all the processes, adding that the completion of the renewal process is targeted for the end of January. He stated it is a complex and time-consuming process and Council is aware of the complexities of the ordinance. There are intentions to meet all the provisions of the ordinance, including transparency.

Mayor Boles understands the process might be taking a little bit longer. She asked if it is possible to start listing permitted and the public can help alert Council if they are finding others. She stated that was the reason for the transparency and enforcement and asked when that might start being added to the website.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that he can talk to the team about what they might be able to begin to upload, but all of the focus is on completing the entire renewal process.

Mayor Boles asked, if at all possible, to get a written update before the Coastal Commission hearing.

City Manager Woodhouse stated, at the hearing, staff will be prepared with some of the data as well and that would be important for the hearing.

Vice Mayor Wright asked, regarding mention of available C/CAG funding, what some of the past funding we have gotten from C/CAG and the two different sets of grants available from them.

PW Dep. Director Yip stated we have a grant consulting third party that we meet with monthly and go over all the grant opportunities that are available. If we can put something together for a grant application from our Bike Master Plan, we will do so. In terms of recent projects we have done, we applied for the SMCTA Cycle 7 Pedestrian and Bicycle program funding for Oceana Bicycle bike lanes and that was $2 million grant request. Unfortunately, we only received $150,000 or so for designs and we are looking to get an RFP out. There was also Congressman Liccardo’s FY 2026 community project funding for the Manor Drive Overcrossing Project, Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A) for the Highway One and Crespi Intersection improvements, a $3.5 million project. There are also several grants for BBIRP for several fiscal years from Department of

2.b
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 7 January 26, 2026
Boating and Waterways (DBW) for the shoreline erosion control and that was $2.5 million. There was also a NOAA community project for our pier rehabilitation for the design which was close to $1 million. We have ongoing safe crossing school grants that we received and are close to $20,000 to $30,000. Another one recently received was for the TDM cycle 3 for our PACES project, Pedestrian Access and Crossing Enhancement for Students project for around $450,000.

We also applied for a bike project for that grant, but did not receive grant funding for that. The City applies wherever we can and qualify for. Sometimes we get it, sometimes we do not, but once we get it, we are happy to implement these bike improvements.

PUBLIC HEARINGS - NONE.

CONSIDERATION

5. 2026 City Council Liaison Assignment(s) to Climate Action & Resilience Committee (CARC)
PROPOSED ACTION: Consideration of appointment of a Primary and/or Alternate City Council Liaison to the City's Climate Action & Resilience Committee (CARC).

City Clerk Coffey presented the staff report on the Climate Action and Resilience Committee liaison position.

There were no public comments.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that this will be a super impactful committee and they have done incredible work thus far. He looks forward to great things continuing from that committee.

Mayor Boles stated based on Councilmembers’ availabilities that she will attend and make it a priority as it is an important Committee, especially in the first year when they are starting and looking for additional funding. She is in the climate space in a lot of different places in the county and state and she thinks she can help.

Vice Mayor Wright moved to appoint Mayor Boles as the liaison to the Climate Action and Resilience Committee; seconded by Councilmember Beckmeyer.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Sue Beckmeyer, Councilmember
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

6. Local Coastal Land Use Plan Implementation: Coastal Access and Resilience Program and the Shoreline Adaptation Program
PROPOSED ACTION: Receive a presentation on the Local Coastal Land Use Plan requirements to develop the Coastal Access and Resilience Program and the Shoreline Adaptation Program, provide input to help guide the Request for Proposals process for consultant selection, and discuss and potentially appoint a City Council Ad Hoc Committee.

Community Development Director Updegrave, Assoc. Planner Snodgrass, and Civic Well Sparks Fellow Koosed presented the staff report.

2.b
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 8 January 26, 2026
Mayor Boles opened public comments.

Michael Wahlman, Pacifica, shared his experience in the military, major disasters, etc., and stated the seawall should be the most paramount concern for public safety. He also stated all avenues for funding should be on the table as well.

Sam Casillas, Pacifica, focused on the community engagement portion and asked about transparency regarding our goals, i.e. people’s current homes or developers. He emphasized the global impact of the climate crisis and the costs associated with relocating infrastructure and the seawall. He highlighted nature-based solutions and stated not to have predetermined outcomes.

He also encouraged the City to work with the Pacifica Land Trust.

Cindy Abbott, Pacifica, aligned herself with Mr. Casillas’ comments. She stated to listen to community input and shared some different consulting options for community engagement. She encouraged community meetings in all parts of the City for the future of the entire City. She asked for honesty and transparency and to decouple SSRAs from SB 272.

Kimberly Finale, Pacifica, recommended community engagement to meet people where they are. The goals of community outreach should include an educational component. She recommended performing outreach at Second Saturdays, farmers’ markets, and during busy weekends. She also asked for the consultants to have a relationship with mother nature.

Sue Digre, Pacifica, shared her concerns that the City does not do a robust job reaching out to the community and many people find out things after they happen. She asked the City to listen to the data and community voices. She also asked which voices we do not normally hear.

Mark Hubbell, Pacifica, stated from past experience with the seawall that we chose a company not based in the U.S., had limited experience with seawalls, and was extremely dismayed about that process. He asked for more consideration and care to be taken as we move forward.

Clif Lawrence, Pacifica, shared his experience in public engagement and felt the previous efforts were based on predetermined solutions. He agreed with prior speakers about getting out in the community, making engagement more accessible, and bringing it closer to the people. He would also like to see more participation from our larger community.

Peter Loeb, Pacifica, supported Mr. Casillas and Ms. Abbott and asked Council about the purpose of community engagement and their vision on the process and what would the outcome be. He asked how Council sees community engagement playing out and what its purpose is.

Dinah Verby, Pacifica, agreed with what Mr. Loeb stated and shared her thoughts on the purpose of community engagement and felt it was unclear at this time. She also shared concerns about funding for hard armoring and mitigation projects and possibility of discussing moving infrastructure and nature-based solutions.

Suzanne Moore, Pacifica, shared her thoughts on the public engagement process, including door-to-door surveys, and community education done by our consultants to include options to consider when an issue is being presented, especially cost, lifespan, and impact of projects.

Mayor Boles closed public comments.

2.b
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 9 January 26, 2026
Mayor Boles stated that, based on the LCLUP as staff presented, we have some tasks identified that Council has committed to, one to sunrise the special shoreline resiliency areas (SSRAs) through the program and the projects as mitigations for allowing armoring in those two areas to continue and also start on the Shoreline Adaptation Plan. She appreciated that the staff report stated it was important to do both of those even though the Shoreline Adaptation Plan has a tenyear deadline. She shared possible funding avenues and anything we can do in a short amount of time to make us eligible for that money is important. She stated the SSRAs was presented as a requirement of our LCLUP, but her understanding is if we are not able to sunrise the SSRAs etc., it does not mean that our LCLUP will become decertified. She asked if we are not eligible for SB 272 if we do not have the SSRAs.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated that one important distinction is that what we are focused on is the Coastal Access and Resilience Program (CARP) and the Shoreline Adaptation Plan. It is the substance of those two programs that are how we are starting to address our sea level rise requirements within the LCP. She stated that those are specifically tied to the sunrising of the SSRAs but it is those two programs that are the driver. She is not aware of a decertification process.

City Manager Woodhouse added that it is important to look at the LCLUP as a policy document that Council approved and Coastal Commission certified which includes all kinds of policies. The SSRAs are one of those with all kinds of policies wrapped into them. The SSRAs are a set of policies that fulfill the neighborhood’s approach direction and phased approach that Council built into the approved LCLUP and Coastal Commission certified. It is staff’s intention and Council’s goal to implement the LCLUP program which includes sunrising the SSRAs. That is not why we are kicking off the Shoreline Adaptation Plan and the CARP process. The purpose of those is for this community to arrive at a long-term vision for what Pacifica’s coast is going to look like in the future. In doing so, the effect of the SSRAs and related policies will sunrise, but the focus is how we are going to come together for the long-term for what Pacifica wants to be in the future.

Mayor Boles referenced previous conversations on the LCLUP that became difficult and would love to hear from all who were part of those about what happened, what we can do differently, how do we bring people along, etc. She stated, regarding purpose, what do we all see and how we want to listen and absorb and work with our community.

Councilmember Beckmeyer echoed what she heard in public comment about a long-term vision and what City Manager said, and she thinks we need to establish that. She stated the sea level rise adaptation plan talks about certain triggers and responses that will happen when certain conditions ensue in the different segments of our shoreline. What made a big impression on her was the contention in the community. She said, if we could do it over, we start with a vision, talk about what are our conditions and data-driven strategies for directing changing conditions on our coast. She thinks part of it is learning what those options are, part of it is listening to each other about what is important, what we value about Pacifica, what do we want to maintain in our community, and how can we go about doing that. For her, that is the purpose of this. While it is tied to implementing certain policies, SSRAs among them, in our Local Coastal Land Use Plan, this effort should exist independent of that. Communities up and down the coast are meeting to do this. She is looking for some kind of structured way to describe what we are looking for so that it can be pitched to various consultants to help us think about outreach strategies. Perhaps the scope of that original plan was too narrowly focused on sea level rise, so perhaps it is worth expanding the conversation to include all of the coastal hazards about which we have policies in our LCLUP.

2.b
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 10 January 26, 2026
Councilmember Bier appreciated all the public comments. She does a lot of outreach from her job and there has to be a plan in place. The only way we can have an outreach plan in place is to know what we are doing and what kind of information we want to gather from our community.

There has be some learning and information has to be shared in many ways and places and we need to gather information and listen to the community. We need to think about what worked and what did not work and how can we move forward with strategies that are going to be the best for our community and how are we going to include youth. Before we can provide input about the RFP, if we have only $150,000 to do that, then we have to be specific about how we spend that money to make sure we get enough reach to our community. She loved meeting people where they are in the community, but even those cost money, planning, and staff time. She does not have a clear idea about what that vision is, what kind of information do we want to gather from our community that we are going to listen to and do something with, and how is that going to fit into the LCLUP that we have.

Councilmember Espinosa asked, when we gather all this information, how are we going to share it with the public and what question are we going to ask from the public. She stated she has a few ideas of how to reach out. She stated that a lot of people are intimidated to come to talk at the microphone and we need to reach out and meet them at their own place where they feel comfortable to speak.

Mayor Boles stated that maybe they will tackle them one at a time, i.e., talk about engagement, who to engage, different ways we want to pursue. She stated, starting with purpose, what is the goal, what are we doing, what are we open to.

Vice Mayor Wright would like to see the process be about education, both Council educating the public on what our current plan is and having the public educate them on what it is that they would like to see. Door-to-door surveys were extremely informative to him in terms of getting a better idea of what the community thinks. He liked that idea. He brought up how we can get youth and there may be room in this process for them to do surveying for us.

Mayor Boles agreed there are ways we can use our community do this work and not necessarily have it all done by a consultant.

Councilmember Bier stated there are surveys, focus groups, key informant interviews, tabletop conversations, etc.

Mayor Boles referred to purpose, a long-term vision, and agreed education will be part of that.

She thinks, whatever we can do as part of education, what are we already seeing that are the storm impacts, what is happening at king tides, etc. She stated we had a vulnerability assessment done by consultants back in 2017-18, but part of listening to the people is asking what are they seeing and letting them tell us what they are seeing. It helps us to understand what is happening and, out of that, what we want for our coast in the future that are important things to us. She thought about how we can have some listening sessions first, not necessarily having a whole plan for public engagement but letting that unfold as we share information from the community and ways that we can reach out to them. It can be our own community bringing things to us that we can partner with, listen to, and share.

Councilmember Bier stated at the same time we still need a plan. She appreciates the lucidness and flow of what she is talking about. She asked if that is going to come from tonight or come from an ad hoc committee that will sit outside of this, think about it, and come back to Council and have that discussion again.

2.b
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 11 January 26, 2026
Mayor Boles understands that, even though we have an adaptation plan with strategies, those were never adopted as that is where things became difficult at some point in the community.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked if the sea level rise adaptation plan was adopted and was that not required prior to updating the LCLUP.

City Manager Woodhouse stated that the adaptation planning process was the feasibility phase leading to the LCLUP policies that went through all those iterations to get to the certified LCLUP.

The Shoreline Adaptation Program is specific. The LCLUP now has some prescriptive contents that it needs to include and staff could talk about those in the LCLUP. That is part of the work necessary to do to get input on.

Councilmember Berkemeyer referred to the document that was produced by ESA in 2017 or 2018, and she asked if it was required to be an adopted document or informational process.

City Manager Woodhouse stated his recollection is that was the process to be able to develop the policies that would then become the LCLUP.

Mayor Boles stated that her understanding is that those were all taken out from the Coastal Commission and we struck all those policies that were by area.

City Manager Woodhouse agreed that it went through all those iterations in the submittal to the Coastal Commission and then back and we went through the modern years of the LCLUP certification. He stated that there is some information there, but all of that is now old data and needs to be updated. He thinks all the different technical studies that the Shoreline Adaptation Plan that the Coastal Commission expects to see in the Shoreline Adaptation Plan and for compliance with SB272 would be updates to those.

Mayor Boles asked if staff can give a little more clarity as to what studies are needed, what information, etc.

Community Development Director Updegrave agreed, stating some legislation that amended SB 272 allows prior work done on sea level rise to be incorporated into the LCP. She stated that we need our consultant with the coastal expertise to help us define what studies we need, what information we have that can be used, what needs to be updated, etc. That is part of their task of helping us develop the starting framework for our Shoreline Adaptation Plan which includes identifying what studies we still need and we will be looking at the existing studies and information, including the coastal vulnerability mapping update.

Mayor Boles stated that would be a different consultant than a public engagement consultant.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated that we are looking for a consultant with coastal expertise and community engagement expertise.

Councilmember Beckmeyer referred to firms suggested in a public comment and asked staff to consider looking deeper into what those offerings are.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated we are compiling a list of different consultants and groups and those will be added into that. We will have to go through the RFP process, and our intention is to make sure all these different organizations are receiving that RFP.

2.b
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 12 January 26, 2026
Mayor Boles stated it is not just a science and data question for a sociology problem but how to get people to think long-term, how to get people to think beyond just holding on to what they have, understanding adaptation means change. These are difficult, personal conversations.

City Manager Woodhouse stated what she said is exactly the high-level guiding parameter information that staff needs now. We are looking at an engagement process that is looking at difficult core values issues that people are passionate about and there is a sociological component to it. That is all information and other comments that were made, even more detailed, whether it is door-to-door surveys or youth being involved. We are looking for all of that high-level guiding parameter information because what we need to do is put together an RFP that goes out, with all the technical pieces of the Shoreline Adaptation Plan that the LCLUP talks about that we will need to address throughout the process and have community engage about and talk about, and how the community engagement is going to be done. We provide high-level guiding parameters and one of the first things the consultant team could do, possibly the first task Council identifies, would be to come in and interview people, go to listening sessions in order to design the community engagement process, etc. It is like engagement to design the engagement process. This is a multi-year process, and the City allocated $150,000 to begin this process. The other goal is that, once we have a consultant on board and they are designing the community engagement process and all the pieces to this, that we are going to be positioned to apply for significant grant funding as this whole process is potentially $1 million over however many years. It is going to be a very expensive process with all the time and resources that are involved. This is the first step to be able to provide enough information for consulting teams to organize themselves, propose on, be selected, come in, and start engaging with the community and learning more about what will the best engagement process over the long term be, what are all the issues, etc.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked how much of a pre-RFP discussion do we have with potential consultants. The idea of SB 272, even though the exact parameters are not well-defined, was all in an effort to get people doing this work because the work is hard and expensive. She asked how we engage in a process where we lessen the intensity and find a way to talk about these things in a respectful, informative way that is science-based, data-driven, and reflective of reality.

When she talks about a long-term vision, if we are going to move infrastructure, she asked what that takes. It could take ten years to plan just that while we will have more erosion, more overtopping, more flooding, more damage, etc. She imagines that we need to have a big overview so the consultant can help us design this.

Councilmember Bier liked what Councilmember Beckmeyer said about talking about exactly what it would take to move infrastructure. There are different pockets of our community, some that do not know what LCLUP is, and how can we get information to and from those Pacificans. Then we have our community groups and community scientists who are doing work out there, and she thinks those are two separate outreaches.

Mayor Boles stated that, if we are talking about a vision for Pacifica, the ocean is a big part of the reason we are all here. She referenced our meetings and stated we have a bell curve of people in terms of the spectrum. If we are going to move a vision forward, we have to bring everybody together and need the voices in the middle. She agreed with actively engaging partner agencies, non-profits, and groups in town. It does not have to be a consultant.

Councilmember Bier asked if we need an ad hoc and she agreed with several members who agreed that we do. She stated that we need people who can put time into this.

2.b
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 13 January 26, 2026
Mayor Boles thinks it is helpful. She and Councilmember Beckmeyer have already been meeting and talking about this, trying to talk to other cities and non-profits to see what is working or not working in other cities.

Asst. City Attorney Bazzano stated that it sounds like there is a majority consensus that wants an ad hoc committee and she suggested that the next step Council can take is to establish that ad hoc committee and give them direction, either do some work and come back to Council or do some work and work with staff on comparing the RFP. If Council takes that step in establishing the ad hoc, they can focus on what the direction to the ad hoc committee is.

Vice Mayor Wright was concerned that, over time, the ad hoc committee may be tasked with more than they may have time to do and he wonders if it is possible for them to limit the scope of the ad hoc committee to something achievable and address additional needs in the future.

City Manager Woodhouse added that ad hocs need to be limited in scope and duration, typically a year. These three tasks could be a year, as task No. 3 [Provide input into the selected consultant’s first task of developing the community engagement plan] is the first implementation task once you have a consultant team on board to begin developing the community engagement plan. He stated that, in future years of this whole process, there could be a different ad hoc committee related to different subtasks or pieces to the development of the Shoreline Adaptation Plan.

Mayor Boles thought we are hearing that No. 3 might be too soon as we need to have some engagement listening sessions.

Councilmember Bier thinks No. 1 [Provide input, ensuring alignment with Council priorities, on the community engagement guiding parameters to be included in the RFP] is going to take a long time and she does not see No. 3 coming around for a while. Given all the input provided at this time, there is going to be a lot of work going into No. 1.

Mayor Boles asked if Council would like the RFP to come back to Council to confirm the tasks, etc., before we go to No. 2 [Participate with staff in the interview process with the top proposal consultant teams] to send it out and start the interview process.

Councilmember Bier agreed.

Mayor Boles stated that this is such important work that will lay the foundation for work years to come and we need to do it well.

Councilmember Beckmeyer agreed, stating it sounds like a process of ad hoc meetings with staff and bring report back to Council as they get closer to defining what the parameters are as mentioned in No. 1. She was asking before about whether they have pre-meetings or prediscussions with potential bidders or responders.

Community Development Director Updegrave stated we typically post an RFP and then have a period for questions and respond to questions. There is an opportunity to engage.

Councilmember Beckmeyer asked how the concept of listening sessions plays into the RFP.

Mayor Boles thought we will need a consultant to help with the listening sessions, at a minimum to moderate.

2.b
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 14 January 26, 2026
City Manager Woodhouse thought the listening sessions fall into No. 3. The consultant comes, interviews stakeholders throughout the community about what type of engagement works for them, schedules listening sessions that the whole Council is listening to community, etc. He stated that is the kickoff to this long process in order to arrive at what the community engagement plan is going to be. It is Council’s prerogative to insert other earlier steps in RFPs but this whole process is becoming very long and expensive. One of the values that has to be balanced throughout the whole process is the effectiveness of resources and efficiency and how do we achieve all that effectiveness in a reasonable way to move the ball forward. He stated that these issues are so urgent to Pacifica that we do not want to take ten years to develop and have a Shoreline Adaptation Plan approved but do it sooner and be ahead of the curve and be one of the first ones in line for grant funding for actual projects that are going to be implemented.

Mayor Boles stated that most of cities she and Councilmember Beckmeyer talked to so far, given they are larger cities, have a dedicated staff person, like a coastal zone administrator, who works with Planning and Public Works, as it is all integrated. She stated that the coastal zone administrator is the one who does all the public outreach and that is one option that we assign a staff person. She knows we cannot hire someone long-term, but perhaps in the short-term. There are resources that we can bring in and help us do this work. We need to do it right. She stated that we heard there is not trust in the community based on what we have done in the past and we need to go slow at the start to build that trust and educate to make sure we are doing it right. If we are going to get projects approved, we want community support and we may have to ask for community funding. The more we can get the community on board and prioritizing strategies and options and specific projects, the more that will help us in the long run.

Vice Mayor Wright stated that is where the ad hoc committee can come in balancing that need.

Councilmember Bier moved to appoint an ad hoc subcommittee consisting of Beckmeyer and Boles with the direction to provide input, ensuring alignment of Council priorities on the community engagement guiding parameters to be included in the RFP; seconded by Vice Mayor Wright.

Vice Mayor Wright wanted the community to be aware of how much time that Mayor Boles and Councilmember Beckmeyer volunteered to give to the community. He expressed his appreciation for their willingness to take on this herculean task.

RESULT: ADOPTED AS AMENDED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mary Bier, Councilmember
SECONDER: Greg Wright, Vice Mayor
AYES: Boles, Wright, Beckmeyer, Bier, Espinosa

COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Bier mentioned funding available through CCAG, OBAG 4 and the TBA Article 3.

She stated OSPAC is looking for direction from Council as to what Council wants them to do. She stated we need to keep talking about that and figure out a way to give direction with and to our committees and commissions once a year or so. She thanked the Fog Fest Organizing Group for changing their meeting to the first Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. so she can attend.

She attended their full day retreat online and was listening from her retreat. She thanked Cherie Chan for coming out to the C/CAG Bike and Pedestrian Advisory group meeting. She referred to Lynn Adams’ retirement and stated it was so fun.

2.b
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 15 January 26, 2026
Vice Mayor Wright stated they had a transition with LAFCO with some new appointed people and, as the newest commissioner, he got re-elected to the Budget Committee. He enjoyed being at C/CAG Bike and Pedestrian Advisory group meeting with Councilmember Bier and thanked the public for being there.

Councilmember Beckmeyer met with the Resource Management Climate Projection Committee last Wednesday and there was a robust presentation about EV adoption over almost five years.

She stated that it always comes back to access to charging infrastructure. She stated there is a webinar on food impact to climate goals on February 3 by Sustainable San Mateo County and they have upcoming climate awards on March 25. The Library Advisory Committee met and are taking a step back in a new tax. There is an organization called Every Library and Cindy Abbott brought forward a book written by one of their founders which talked about the actual information process that needs to go out and be very much imbued to the community prior to a ballot measure.

The committee will study parts of this book over time.

Mayor Boles stated she was at the CalCities Mayors and Councilmembers conference last week and the Environmental Quality Policy first meeting on Friday and a lot of the presentations focused on municipal finance. She found out about a new fund called the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund that has money for EV charging and climate infrastructure and CalCities is pushing for this money to be used for unfunded state mandates, such as fleet electrification and EV charging, etc.

The governor is projecting a sizeable deficit so we have to be mindful of cuts that might be coming.

The Strong Towns event was on Saturday and she thanked Pete Shoemaker for bringing this together and for City staff for attending. She stated that she and Councilmember Beckmeyer talked to Oceanside and shared their experience with community engagement and outreach.

They partnered with Resilient Cities Catalyst, an international non-profit that is trying to help communities struggling with coastal adaptation all over the world. Right now, they have decided to focus a lot of their energies on California because we seem to be a state wanting to solve the problem and legislators at the state level and in communities are trying to move things forward.

Their advice to Oceanside was to start over and open up to whatever creative ideas might come and they ended up, for this one area, recommending a design competition and got all these creative ideas from international firms and, on their committees, to pick the project moving forward and they intentionally put people who were opposed to the project before on these committees and learn about the project, about the choices, and help make those decisions, thus empowering the decision makers and trying to bring consensus around it. They pick five communities in California to work with now, Oceanside, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz, Fort Bragg and Alameda.

She stated that the more we can learn from other cities, as we are all having the same struggles, the more it can help. She added that tomorrow there is a vigil in front of the San Francisco VA Medical Center on Clemente and 42nd Street in memory of Alex Pretti, the VA nurse that was killed by ICE over the weekend in Minneapolis.

ADJOURN
Mayor Boles adjourned the meeting at 9:37 pm in memory of Robert Caughlan who passed away last weekend. He was an incredible environmental activist with deep understanding and skill and political advocacy stemming from decades of experience at the highest levels of government in non-profit leadership.

Transcribed by Barbara Medina, Public Meeting Stenographer.

Respectfully Submitted,

2.b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes) City Council Regular Meeting 16 January 26, 2026
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
__________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor

2.b
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Attachment B: Minutes of 1-26-2026 City Council Special & Regular Meeting (6162 : Approval of Minutes)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Continuation of Proclamation of Local Emergency of the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the End of Beach Boulevard
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

STAFF CONTACT:

Roland Yip, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer 650-738-3767
[email protected]
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On January 22, 2016, the Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency along the Pacifica coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard due to El Nino storm activity. Extreme wave heights for extended periods of time caused top-of-bluff retreat at several locations along the Pacifica coast and damage to City infrastructure. Since this date, the Director of Emergency Services has proclaimed the existence of other local emergencies along this same stretch of coastline. These emergencies are described below:
• The January 22, 2016 storm caused a failure of the Beach Blvd. seawall near Santa Maria Avenue, which has been repaired.
• The January 22, 2016 storm also caused the undermining of an eight-foot diameter storm drain outfall and concrete headwall for the discharge of Milagra Creek into the Pacific Ocean near 700 Palmetto Avenue from the. The project was completed on April 24, 2023.
• During the 2016-2018 storms, the 300 & 400 blocks of Esplanade Avenue experienced episodic bluff erosion. The bluff erosion has progressed to a point where the erosion is now threatening public infrastructure and utilities.
• On December 16, 2020, a failure of the Beach Blvd. seawall near Santa Rosa Avenue and the Pier created a large void (approx. 25’ w x 25’ l ). The repairs were completed by February 22, 2021.
• On December 29, 2020, another void ( approx. 10’ w x 15’ l) around 150-200 feet north of the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Santa Rosa Avenue. The repairs were completed by February 2021.
3 Packet Pg. 51
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026
• On January 14, 2021, a combination of high tides and large waves damaged a forty-foot section of the Pacifica Municipal Pier’s west facing deck and concrete railing. The railing repair was beyond what had been funded for the project, the City pivoted to do further inspections on the pier before a sizable investment is made in fixing the rails, since it was prudent for the City to understand the full needs of the pier. The 2023 Pier Condition Assessment Report has been finalized and is able to be viewed at www.cityofpacifica.org/pier. A rough order of magnitude of up to $20 million for the repairs is and design and permitting. The structural engineers recommended limiting public access on the pier to approximately half of the main pier deck until repairs to the more severely damaged areas.
• In November of 2023, a failure behind the seawall was discovered at the intersection of Beach Blvd. and Salada Ave. A void (approx. 2’-7’ w x 40’ l) was found behind the seawall and was repaired with concrete and cement slurry. The repairs were completed by the end of December 2023.
• On December 29, 2023, another failure (approx. 300 sf) behind the seawall was discovered at Beach Blvd. and San Jose Ave. and was temporarily plugged. The repairs were completed by January 10, 2024. This also caused damage to the Milagra storm drain outfall and left substantial sand deposits on the Beach Boulevard Prominade and on the southern Beach Boulevard rock revetment.
• In March of 2024, City staff received an Emergency Coastal Development Permit (ECDP) from the California Coastal Commission (CCC) for removal of the substantial sand deposits left on Beach Boulevard Promenade and southern rock revetment as well as for the repair of the damage to the Milagra outfall. Repairing the outfall and removal of the sand on the Beach Boulevard Promenade and removal of the sand from the southern Beach Boulevard Rock Revetment was completed by mid-May of 2024. • In May 2024, a sink hole (approx. 5’ w x 25’ l) was discovered behind the seawall on Beach Blvd. to the north of Santa Maria. The hole was repaired through an emergency contractor.
• In November 2024, a new sink hole (approx. 8’ w x 30’ l) was discovered behind the seawall on Beach Blvd. between Carmel Ave and Santa Maria Ave. The hole was repaired through an emergency contractor by December 16, 2024. • On November 13th, 2025, two sink holes (approx. 3’ w x 16’ l and 8’ w x 10’ l) were discovered behind the seawall on Beach Blvd and between Santa Maria Avenue and San Jose Avenue. Another sink hole (approx. 12’ w x 16’ l) was discovered behind the seawall near Chit Chat Cafe while making repairs to the first 2 sink holes. All sinkholes were repaired through an emergency contractor by December 16, 2025. Revetment 300' south of the Chit Chat Cafe had moved and left the seawall exposed. The restacking of the revetment was performed by an emergency contractor by February 9th, 2026.

The City Council first ratified this proclamation (Attachment A) at its regular meeting of January 25, 2016. Since that date, additional damage has occurred along Beach Boulevard and Esplanade Avenue as noted above.

Pursuant to Government Code section 8630(c), the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency at least every 60 days until the City Council terminates the local emergency. Conditions of local emergency still exist since the City Council first acted to declare 3 Packet Pg. 52
Pacifica City Council 3
March 09, 2026
a local emergency on January 25, 2016, and since that time staff have brought the continuance of Proclamation confirming the existence of local emergency exists within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard every 30 days with January 12, 2026 being the most recent.

The City is using a combination of city staff, contractors, and consultants to manage the discussed emergency work. Staff will bring recommendations to the Council to end the emergency designation for projects on the list once conditions stabilize and the projects are no longer in need of the emergency designation.

The City Manager recommends that the City Council make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist within the Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to the end of Beach Boulevard.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
Assistant City Manager
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd. (PDF)
3 Packet Pg. 53
"ATTACHMENT 1"

3.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Attachment A: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd. (6159 :
"ATTACHMENT 1"

3.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Attachment A: Proclamation of Local Emergency Regarding Pacifica Coastline from Westline Drive to End of Beach Blvd. (6159 :

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Continuation of Proclamation of a Local Emergency at the Sewer Mains Crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept report and make a determination that conditions of local emergency continue to exist at the Sewer Mains Crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood.

STAFF CONTACT:

Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 501-6016
[email protected]
Dan Patten, P.E., Interim Deputy Director of Public Works – Wastewater Division (650) 738-4660
[email protected]
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk
650-738-7307
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On August 6, 2025, Public Works Wastewater Division staff received a call from a resident observing a crack on the 6-inch sewer main crossing Calera Creek near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenue. Public Works Wastewater Division staff responded to the notification and inspected the sewer main and discovered evidence of corrosion on the sewer main. Staff also conducted a temporary repair. The temporary repair is inadequate for the long term, and the cracked sewer main requires immediate repair to prevent potential sanitary Sewer Spills and threaten the safety of persons and property, including polluting the Calera Creek watershed.

On August 20, 2025, the Director of Emergency Services proclaimed the existence of a local emergency at the sewer mains crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenue due to corroded conditions and potential collapse of the 6-inch sewer main crossing Calera Creek (Attachment 1). Since this date, the Director of Emergency Services has proclaimed the existence of these emergencies as described below:
• There is a potential for leakage during wet weather flows. The potential for sewer main failures and resulting sanitary sewer spills threatens the creek. • Sewer mains cross Calera Creek in three locations in the Vallemar neighborhood. These sewer mains have been identified as health and safety of persons and property, including critical public infrastructure for replacement as part of the Vallemar and Rockaway Beach Boulevard 4 Packet Pg. 56
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026
Areas Sewer and Rehabilitation and Repair Project. The design of this project (approved by Council August 26, 2024) is in progress. The City is fast-tracking the creek crossings portion of the project, and construction documents are underway.
• The creek crossing near Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenues has deteriorated further since inspection earlier this year, and there is a risk that the other creek crossings in the neighborhood are deteriorating further and may result in sanitary sewer spills.

The City Council first ratified this proclamation (Attachment 2) at its regular meeting of August 25, 2025. Since that date, staff is expeditiously working towards a permanent repair solution. • Work on the three creek crossings is nearing completion. • Sewer main work near the Reina del Mar Avenue crossing is anticipated to be completed in mid-March.

Pursuant to Government Code section 8630(c), the City Council must review the need for continuing the local emergency at least every 60 days until the City Council terminates the local emergency. Conditions of local emergency at the sewer mains crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenue still exist since the City Council first acted to declare a local emergency on August 25, 2025. Staff will bring up the continuance of Proclamation every 30 days, with February 9, 2026, being the most recent.

The City Manager recommends that the City Council make a determination that the conditions of local emergency continue to exist at the sewer mains crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar Neighborhood near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenue.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to adopt the Proclamation Confirming Existence of Local Emergency at the sewer mains crossing Calera Creek in the Vallemar neighborhood, however this is not recommended. Delaying the work increases the risk of Sanitary Sewer Spills into Calera Creek and may cause health and safety issues to persons and property, including critical public infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There are no fiscal impacts associated with the emergency declared.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works - Wastewater Division
4 Packet Pg. 57
Pacifica City Council 3
March 09, 2026
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment 1 - PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY at Calera Creek Oneonta - Minerva (PDF)
Attachment 2 - ResolutionNo74-2025_RatifyingProclamationLocalEmergency_SewerMainVallemar_EXECUTED (PDF) 4 Packet Pg. 58

CITY OF PACIFICA
170 Santa Maria Avenue • Pacifica, California 94044-2506 www.cityofpacifica.org
MAYOR
Sue Beckmeyer

MAYOR PRO
TEM
Christine Boles

COUNCIL
Mary Bier
Mayra Espinosa
Greg Wright
Scenic Pacifica
Incorporated Nov. 22, 1957

PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City Council is not in session, subject to confirmation by the City Council at the earliest possible time; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services of the City of Pacifica; and WHEREAS, on Wednesday, August 6, 2025, Public Works Wastewater Division received a notification from the public regarding observation of a crack on the 6-inch sewer main crossing the Calera Creek near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenue in Vallemar neighborhood; and WHEREAS, Public Works Wastewater Division staff responded to the notification and inspected the sewer main and discovered evidence of corrosion, which caused a crack that was dripping; and WHEREAS, Staff made a temporary repair that would help to prevent complete failure of the sewer main by wrapping pipe repair tape; and
WHEREAS, the temporary repair is inadequate for the long term, and the cracked sewer main requires a more extensive immediate repair to prevent potential sanitary Sewer Spills and threatens the safety of persons and property, including polluting the Calera Creek watershed; and WHEREAS, such conditions are or are likely to be beyond the handling capability of the City’s services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair; and
WHEREAS, the City provides this written notification to the San Mateo County and State CalEMA’s Regional and Headquarter offices of a proclamation of local emergency; and WHEREAS, such proclamation shall be subject to confirmation by the Pacifica City Council at the earliest possible time.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED that, in accordance with State Law and the City of Pacifica Municipal Code, the Director of Emergency Services proclaims the existence of a local emergency at the sewer main crossing the Calera Creek near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva Avenue in the Vallemar neighborhood.

DATED: August 20, 2025
By:
_____________________________
Kevin Woodhouse
Director of Emergency Services

4.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Attachment 1 - PROCLAMATION OF LOCAL EMERGENCY at Calera Creek Oneonta - Minerva (6160 : Continuation of Proclamation RESOLUTION NO. 74-2025

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA

RATIFYING THE PROCLAMATION CONFIRMING EXISTENCE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY AT

THE SEWER MAINS CROSSING CALERA CREEK IN THE VALLEMAR NEIGHBORHOOD WHEREAS, Section 4-2.05 of the City of Pacifica Municipal Code (“PMC”) designates the City Manager as the Director of Emergency Services; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 8630 and PMC section 4-2.05(a) empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when said city is affected or likely to be affected by an emergency, subject to ratification by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.02 of the PMC defines “emergency” as the “actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within this City caused by such conditions as earthquake, hazardous materials, plane crash, landslide, tsunami, epidemic, flood, riot, fire, or other conditions, including conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or are likely to be beyond the capability of control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of this City, requiring the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat”; and
WHEREAS, Section 4-2.01 et seq. of the Pacifica Municipal Code empowers the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City Council is not in session, subject to confirmation by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services of the City of Pacifica; and
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2025, the Department of Public Works Wastewater Division staff, observed a crack in the six-inch sewer main crossing Calera Creek between Oneonta Avenue and Reina del Mar Avenue; and
WHEREAS, failures of corroded sewer mains would create a hazardous condition including potential Sanitary Sewer Spills and threaten the safety of persons and property, including critical public infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has determined that the damaged sewer main threatens the health and safety of persons and properties, including critical public infrastructure, and requires immediate attention and repair and as such constitutes an emergency pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 4-2.02 and Public Contract Code section 1102; and WHEREAS, such conditions are or are likely to be beyond the handling capability of the City’s services, personnel, equipment, and facilities, requiring the use of outside contractors to conduct emergency repair pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code section 3-15.09 without giving notice for bids to let contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code 22050; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2025, the City Manager, in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed the existence of local emergency in the City of Pacifica, after determining that the 6-inch sewer main crossing Calera Creek near the intersection of Oneonta Avenue and Minerva

4.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Attachment 2 - ResolutionNo74-2025_RatifyingProclamationLocalEmergency_SewerMain-Vallemar_EXECUTED (6160 :

4.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Attachment 2 - ResolutionNo74-2025_RatifyingProclamationLocalEmergency_SewerMain-Vallemar_EXECUTED (6160 :

RESOLUTION NO. 74-2025

ATTACHMENT A

4.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Attachment 2 - ResolutionNo74-2025_RatifyingProclamationLocalEmergency_SewerMain-Vallemar_EXECUTED (6160 :

CITY OF PACIFICA
170 Santa Maria Avenue • Pacifica, California 94044-2506 www.cityofpacifica.org
MAYOR
Sue Beckmeyer

MAYOR PRO
TEM
Christine Boles

COUNCIL
Mary Bier
Mayra Espinosa
Greg Wright
Scenic Pacifica
Incorporated Nov. 22, 1957

DATED: August 20, 2025
By:
_____________________________
Kevin Woodhouse
Director of Emergency Services

4.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Attachment 2 - ResolutionNo74-2025_RatifyingProclamationLocalEmergency_SewerMain-Vallemar_EXECUTED (6160 :

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Notice of Completion for the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt the Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica accepting completion and directing the City Manager to file Notice of Completion for the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project; and authorize the City Manager to release the retention funds to the contractor.

STAFF CONTACT:

Matt Kelly, Project Manager
(650) 730-0212
[email protected]
Daniel Patten, P.E. Interim Deputy Director of Public Works - Wastewater Division (650) 922-7248
[email protected]
Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 501-6016
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On August 14, 2023, City Council authorized the City Manager to Award and Execute a Master Agreement for Consultant Services for Engineering Design of the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project. The authorized project budget for Consultant and Design Services was $506,000.00 and utilized the Enterprise Fund (Fund 518) as its source.

On May 28, 2024, City Council authorized the City Manager to Award and Execute a Construction Agreement for the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project. The project included replacing existing sewer mains with new pipes and rehabilitating manholes to improve system reliability and reduce the risks of sanitary sewer spills as well as inflow and infiltration (I&I). The project was financed through the California Infrastructure Bank $21 Million Installment Sale Agreement which was approved by Council on May 8, 2023. This Agreement financed wastewater system improvement projects including the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project. The authorized project budget for construction and design services during construction was $11,748,689.05 and utilized the Enterprise Fund (Fund 518) as its source.

The combined authorized budget for consultant engineering design services and construction was $12,254,689.05.

There were thirteen construction change orders issued to the contractor Ranger Pipelines 5 Packet Pg. 64
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026
during the course of construction in the amount of $1,619,710.25 or 16% or the contract value.

The change orders included additional scope to improve the overall Linda Mar neighborhood sewer system that has been problematic for the city. These added scope items include 4,256 LF of sewer main line, 105 lateral connections, and 17 manhole rehabilitations. There were also a few design changes due to existing condition conflicts, weather delays, and bid item quantity adjustments. With the change orders final contractor construction cost for the project was $10,097,725.25.

As the project is now complete and staff is satisfied with the contractor’s work on the project, it is appropriate to record the formal Notice of Completion with the San Mateo County Recorder's Office. This recorded document is the legal notice that the City considers the project complete and that we intend to pay the contractor for the full and complete contract price. This also puts all subcontractors and suppliers on notice that if they have any claims for payment from the contractor, they have 30 days to file claims for payment against the City. This provision of contract law protects subcontractors from contractors who may not pay them properly. It also protects the City from claims against us for any nonpayment on the part of the contractor. The City withheld 5% of the contract amount, $504,886.26, as retention to make sure that all subcontractors and suppliers have been paid. The City will release the retention if no claims are received.

The City Manager is recommending the adoption of the attached resolution accepting completion of the project and the filing of the Notice of Completion (Attachment 1) with the San Mateo County Recorder's Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the filing of the Notice of Completion. The total project Source and Use of Funds table is shown below. The project balance will remain in Fund 518- Enterprise Fund.

Total Project Source and Use of Funds
Enterprise Fund (Fund 518) $12,254,689.05
Total Source of Funds $12,254,689.05
Construction Cost - Ranger Pipelines, Inc. $10,097,725.25 Construction Management Cost- Tanner Pacific Inc. $1,360,832.00 Engineering Services Design & During ConstructionSchaaf & Wheeler$421,889.07 Total Use of Funds $11,880,446.32
Project End Balance $374,242.73
ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to adopt the resolution accepting completion of the project, but as the work has been satisfactorily completed, the contractor may file a claim against the City for nonpayment of retention, if there are no claims. 5 Packet Pg. 65
Pacifica City Council 3
March 09, 2026
RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of the Notice of Completion for the Lower Linda Mar Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Stewardship of City Infrastructure: includes repairing/replacing outdated city facilities such as infrastructure, city hall, the libraries, fire stations, etc., improving streets, and responding to impacts of sea level rise.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Lower Linda Mar Sewer R&R Project- NOTICE OF COMPLETION (PDF) 5 Packet Pg. 66
Pacifica City Council 4
March 09, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA

ACCEPTING COMPLETION AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO FILE

NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
LOWER LINDA MAR SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION AND REPAIR PROJECT (C044) WHEREAS, the City Engineer of the said City has filed with the City Clerk of said City, his Certificate as to the completion of all the work provided to be done under and pursuant to the contract between said City and Ranger Pipelines, on March 9, 2026, and WHEREAS, it appears to the satisfaction of this Council that said work under said contract has been fully completed as provided in said contract and the plans and specifications therein referred to,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Pacifica as follows:

1.That acceptance of completion of said work be, and it is hereby, made and ordered.

2.That the City Manager is directed to file for record with the County Recorder of the County of San Mateo, Notice of Completion thereof, pursuant to Section 3093 of the Civil Code of the State of California.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 9
th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

CITY OF PACIFICA:
_________________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 5 Packet Pg. 67

NOTICE OF COMPLETION

CITY OF PACIFICA

FOR THE LOWER LINDA MAR SEWER R&R PROJECT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 3093 of the Civil Code of the State of California, by Daniel Patten, P.E., Public Works Interim Deputy Director of the City of Pacifica, California, that the contract awarded to Ranger Pipelines on May 28, 2024, has been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications for said work filed with the City Clerk, and approved by the City Council of said City.

That said work and improvements were actually completed on the 14th day of January 2026 and that acceptance of completion of said work was ordered by the City Council of said City, adopted on the 9th day of March, 2026, and that the name of the surety on the contractor's bond for labor and materials on said project is Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

That said work consists generally, of replacing existing sewer mains with new pipes and rehabilitating manholes to improve system reliability and reduce the risks of sanitary sewer spills as well as inflow and infiltration (I&I).

Name and address of Owner: City of Pacifica
170 Santa Maria Ave
Pacifica, California 94044
____________
Daniel Patten, P.E.

DPW Interim Deputy Director- WW Division

VERIFICATION
The undersigned states that he is the Deputy Director of the City of Pacifica and that he makes this verification on behalf of said entity; that he has read the foregoing, and knows the contents thereof, and that the facts stated therein are true. ______
Daniel Patten, P.E.

DPW Interim Deputy Director- WW Division
Executed in Pacifica, California, on March 9, 2026.

5.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Lower Linda Mar Sewer R&R Project- NOTICE OF COMPLETION (6142 : Resolution - Lower Linda Mar R&R Project- Notice of

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission (“SLC”) for the Continued Use of Tidal and Submerged Lands as a Public Fishing Pier (Pacifica Pier) and Other Uses.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution Approving Lease Agreement 4585 between the City of Pacifica and the State Lands Commission (“SLC”) for the continued use of tidal and submerged lands as a public fishing pier (Pacifica Pier) and other uses; finding the approval of the Lease Agreement exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities); and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Lease Agreement and any related documents.

STAFF CONTACT:

Scott Leslie, Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director
(650) 446-4683
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On August 25, 1971, the SLC authorized Permit No. 4585.9 (“Permit) for the City’s use of State tidal and submerged lands, to allow the City to construct, operate and maintain a public fishing pier, a 30” diameter sanitary sewer outfall and a steel seawall around the edge of the Pacifica Pier’s deck. (Attachment 1). The Permit did not impose any rent but specified that consideration to the State for the Permit was the public benefit. The Permit term was from June 1, 1971, to May 31, 2020.

The Pacifica Pier was built in 1973. The Pier spans a total of 1,020 feet in an east-west direction into the Pacific Ocean and is used by locals and visitors for fishing and sight-seeing. A sewer pipeline is built within the deck of the Pier but is no longer in use and has been capped by the City. A steel seawall around the edge of the Pier’s deck is also in place.

In 2021, staff from the SLC approached the City with an updated lease to replace the existing Permit. The SLC and City staff agreed that the Permit terms would remain applicable until a new lease was executed. Since that time, SLC and City staff have had ongoing discussions regarding the potential terms of a new lease.

In 2024, SLC staff provided the current draft lease template (Lease 4585). City staff have worked with SLC staff to revise certain provisions to make them more flexible, given the City’s use of the Pier.

The proposed Lease 4585 is broken into 3 Sections, with Sections 2 modifying some of the terms in Section 3.
6 Packet Pg. 69
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026
Below is a summary of the more significant terms of the proposed Lease 4585:
• Lease Premises- include tide and submerged lands but also all improvements, such as the Pier, built upon the submerged lands.
• Specified Land Use-Public fishing pier, restaurant/café, restrooms, nonoperational sewer pipeline, educational/research and seawall; • Term- 20 years;
• Consideration-Public use and benefit but the City would agree that all revenue accruing to the City from use of the Lease Premises must be placed in a separate account and used for payment of Expenses. Any money remaining in the separate account after termination of the Lease would be transferred to the SLC;
• City would be responsible for any applicable taxes, insurance, cost of maintenance, utilities, repairs, or other costs or obligations associated with the Premises. The City can make certain “Emergency Repairs” without advance notice to the SLC and can close the Pier for events such as flooding, king tides or other inclement weather. “Major Repairs” will require approval from the SLC; • The City would be required to indemnify the SLC; and
• Upon termination of the Lease, the City would be responsible for removing the Improvements and restore the Premises to an unimproved condition.

Staff recommend approval of Lease 4585 in order that the City can continue to use the tidal and submerged land for public enjoyment of the Pier. (Attachment 2) If approved, Lease 4585 will need to be approved by the SLC.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Do not approve the agreement and provide staff with alternative direction.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Review of this issue is not specifically a part of the workplan but does relate to Goal 02, “Improve and Steward City Infrastructure, Streets, and Facilities” of the Pacifica Strategic Plan 2023 to 2030.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact directly related to approving Lease 4585 since there is no rent that will be paid but as indicated above, the proposed terms of Lease 4585 would require the City to place any “Gross Income” from the use of the Lease Premises into a separate fund, which can only be used for the operation, maintenance and improvement to the Lease Premises. The City currently receives approximately $22,800 per year from the sublease to Chit Chat Café.

However, the costs of maintenance and repair each year far exceed this amount.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Approval of the proposed Lease 4585 is exempt from review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities) as the approval of the lease is for an existing facility with negligible or no expansion of use.

ORIGINATED BY:

Parks, Beaches & Recreation Department
6 Packet Pg. 70
Pacifica City Council 3
March 09, 2026
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (PDF)
State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (PDF) 6 Packet Pg. 71
Pacifica City Council 4
March 09, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING LEASE AGREEMENT 4585 BETWEEN THE CITY OF PACIFICA AND THE STATE

LANDS COMMISSION FOR THE CONTINUED LEASE BY THE CITY OF TIDAL AND

SUBMERGED LANDS FOR USE AS A PUBLIC FISHING PIER (PACIFICA PIER) AND OTHER USES; FINDING THE APPROVAL OF THE LEASE AGREEMENT EXEMPT

FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15301 (CLASS 1-EXISTING USE); AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND ANY

RELATED DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1971, the California State Lands Commission (“SLC”) authorized Permit No. 4585.9 (“Permit) for the City’s use of State tidal and submerged lands, to allow the City to construct, operate and maintain a public fishing pier, a 30” diameter sanitary sewer outfall and a steel seawall around the edge of the Pacifica Pier’s deck; and WHEREAS, the City has constructed and currently maintains a public fishing pier; and WHEREAS, the Permit term was from June 1, 1971, to May 31, 2020; and WHEREAS, in 2021, staff from the SLC approached the City with an updated lease to replace the existing Permit; and
WHEREAS, SLC and City staff have had ongoing discussions regarding the potential terms of a new lease; and
WHEREAS, in 2024, SLC staff provided the current draft lease template (“Lease 4585”); and WHEREAS, City staff have worked with SLC staff to revise certain provisions to make them more flexible, given the City’s use of the Pier and is recommending approval of Lease 4585.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica hereby finds that the approval of the proposed Lease 4585 is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15301 (Class 1-Existing Facilities) as the approval of the lease is for an existing facility with negligible or no expansion of use.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves Lease Agreement 4585 between the City of Pacifica and the SLC, attached hereto, for the continued use of tidal and submerged lands.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute Lease Agreement 4585 in a form substantially similar to the one attached hereto, with minor amendments which may be approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, to take all necessary actions to implement its terms and to execute any documents necessary to effectuate the terms of Lease Agreement 4585.
6 Packet Pg. 72
Pacifica City Council 5
March 09, 2026
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 9
th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:

RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
California State Lands Commission
Attn: Land Management Division
100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8202

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Document entitled to free recordation
pursuant to Government Code Section
27383

SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
County: San Mateo
LEASE 4585
This Lease consists of this summary and the following attached and incorporated parts:

Section 1 Basic Provisions
Section 2 Special Provisions Amending or Supplementing Section 1 or 3 Section 3 General Provisions
Exhibit A Land Description
Exhibit B Site and Location Map
SECTION 1: BASIC PROVISIONS
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, hereinafter referred to as Lessor acting by and through the CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION (100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South, Sacramento, California 95825-8202), pursuant to Division 6 of the Public Resources Code and Title 2, Division 3 of the California Code of Regulations, and for consideration specified in this Lease, does hereby lease, demise, and let to CITY OF PACIFICA, hereinafter referred to as Lessee, those certain lands described in Exhibit A hereinafter referred to as Lease Premises, subject to the reservations, terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease.

6.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4903-0796-4742 v1
MAILING ADDRESS:
151 Milagra Drive
Pacifica, CA 94044
LEASE TYPE:

General Lease – Public Agency Use
LAND TYPE:

Sovereign tide and submerged land
LOCATION:

Pacific Ocean, near Pacifica, San Mateo County, as described in Exhibit A attached and by this reference made a part hereof.

LAND USE OR PURPOSE:

Public fishing pier, restaurant/café, restrooms, non-operational sewer pipeline, educational/research and seawall.

TERM:
20 years; beginning Month Day, 2026; ending Month Day, 2046, unless sooner terminated as provided under this Lease.

CONSIDERATION:

The public use and benefit, as stated in Section 2, Paragraph 6, “Consideration and Pier Revenue.”
AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS:

X EXISTING: Public fishing pier, restaurant/café, restrooms, non-operational sewer pipeline, educational/research and seawall.

LIABILITY INSURANCE:
$0
SURETY BOND OR OTHER SECURITY:
$0
SECTION 2: SPECIAL PROVISIONS

BEFORE THE EXECUTION OF THIS LEASE, ITS PROVISIONS ARE AMENDED, REVISED, OR SUPPLEMENTED AS FOLLOWS:

6.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4903-0796-4742 v1

1. The land described in Exhibit A of the Lease is subject to the Public Trust and is presently available to members of the public for recreational, waterborne commerce, navigation, fisheries, open space, or other recognized Public Trust uses and that Lessee’s authorized activities and use of the Lease Premises shall not interfere or limit the Public Trust rights of the public.

2. Lessee shall provide records of timing and duration of pier closures as a result of flooding (wave-overtopping) or storm-related damage that impedes access to the lease area, when requested by Lessor and provided that Lessee maintains such records.

3. Lessee shall provide records of timing and extent of damage to the seawall as a result of flooding (wave-overtopping) or storms, when requested by Lessor and provided that the Lessee maintains such records, has knowledge of the damage to the seawall and has undertaken Repairs to the Improvements to correct the damage.

4. Consideration and Pier Revenue
a. Section 3, paragraphs 2.2-2.9 are deleted in their entirety. The consideration for granting this Lease is the use and benefit provided to the public. b. Lessee agrees that all revenue accruing to the Lessee from use of the Lease Premises, defined below as Gross Income, shall be used solely for the payment of Expenses.
c. Lessee shall establish and maintain a separate account for the deposit of Gross Income and for the payment of Expenses. Any money remaining in the account at the termination and non-renewal of this Lease shall be transferred to the State of California, through the California State Lands Commission. d. Consistent with Section 3, Paragraph 2.10, Lessee shall maintain full and accurate accounting of Gross Income and Expenses. Lessee shall make such records available to Lessor’s staff upon request.
e. For purposes of this paragraph:
i. “Gross Income” shall include all income from operations and activities conducted on or over the Lease Premises but shall not include any tax payable to federal, state, county, or municipal governments as a direct result of operations under this Lease, provided that these taxes are clearly segregated and identified in Lessee’s books and records.

6.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4903-0796-4742 v1
ii. “Expenses” shall include Lessee’s direct and indirect costs related to the operation, maintenance, and repair of improvements authorized under the Lease, including administrative costs.
f. Lessee reserves the right at any time to set a monetary rent if the Commission finds such action to be in the State’s best interests. Such monetary rent may be based on a percentage of Gross Income.

5. Emergency Repairs. Section 3, paragraph 9.2 shall be amended to add the following sentence, “Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event Emergency Repairs are needed to be made to the Lease Premises, the Lessee may make those Emergency Repairs without giving prior to notice to Lessor. However, Lessee shall inform Lessor of the Emergency Repairs within ten calendar days of the event that necessitated the Emergency Repairs”
a. For purposes of this paragraph:
i. “Emergency Repairs” shall include both Minor or Major Repairs that are urgent and unexpected and are required to address critical issues that could cause significant damage, harm, or loss to the Lease Premises or the public if not addressed immediately. These emergency repairs are typically unforeseen and need to be completed quickly to prevent further damage or maintain safety.

6. Closure of Pier. Lessee may exclude persons from the Lease Premises during periods of Major Repairs or Emergency Repairs as well as periods of flooding, king tide events or because of inclement weather.

7. Lessee to Indemnify Lessor. Section 3, paragraph 11.2 shall be replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
“Lessee to Indemnify Lessor. Except to the extent caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Lessor, Lessee shall indemnify, hold harmless, and, at the option of Lessor, defend Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all Damages resulting from Lessee’s occupation and use of the Lease Premises. Lessee shall reimburse Lessor in full for all reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees, specifically including, without limitation, any Damages arising by reason of: (1) The issuance and enjoyment of this Lease; (2) The challenge to or defense of any environmental review upon which the issuance of this Lease is based; (3) The death or injury of any person, or damage to or destruction of any property from any cause whatever in any way connected with the Lease Premises, or with any of the Improvements or personal property on the Lease Premises; (4) The condition of the Lease Premises, or Improvements on the Lease Premises; (5) An act or omission on the Lease Premises by Lessee or any person in, on, or about the Lease Premises; (6) Any work performed on the Lease Premises or material furnished to the Lease Premises; (7)

6.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4903-0796-4742 v1
Lessee’s failure to comply with any Applicable Laws or violation of any Environmental Laws; (8) The costs for any cleanup or other response costs relating to the release or threatened release of Hazardous Materials on the Lease Premises during Lessee’s occupation of the Lease Premises. This obligation includes the prior agreement between Lessee and Lessor dated June 1, 1971, and will continue until Lessee has performed all duties under Paragraph 14.”

8. Lessee to Notify Lessor. Section 3, paragraph 11.4 shall be amended to read as follows:
“Lessee shall notify Lessor in case of any accident, injury, or casualty on the Lease Premises within a reasonable period of time after the Lessee becomes aware of the accident, injury or casualty on the Lease Premises.”

9. Lessee agrees the provisions of Section 3, Paragraph 8, shall also extend to the period of Lessee’s occupation of the Lease Premises, from June 1, 2020 to Month Day, 2026.

6.a
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 1 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) Section 3: General Provisions
Paragraph 1: Definitions
“Applicable Laws” are all local, state, and federal statutes, regulations, rules, codes (including building codes), ordinances, judgments, orders, notice requirements, and other requirements of governmental authorities pertaining to the use or condition of the Lease Premises and the conduct of Lessee’s business thereon in effect as of the date of execution of this Lease or subsequently enacted and lawfully applied hereto.
“Damages” are all liabilities, demands, claims, actions, or causes of action whether regulatory, legislative, or judicial in nature; all assessments, levies, losses, fines, penalties, damages, costs, and expenses, including, without limitation: (i) reasonable attorneys’, accountants’, investigators’, and experts’ fees and expenses sustained or incurred in connection with the defense or investigation of any such liability, and (ii) costs and expenses incurred to bring the Lease Premises into compliance with Applicable Laws, Environmental Laws, a court order, or applicable provisions of a Regulatory Agency. The term “Damages” also includes those Damages that arise as a result of strict liability, whether arising under Environmental Laws or otherwise.
“Environmental Laws” are any and all federal, state, or local environmental, health, or safety-related laws, regulations, standards, decisions of courts, ordinances, rules, codes, orders, decrees, directives, guidelines, permits, or permit conditions, treaties and conventions, currently existing and as amended, enacted, issued, or adopted in the future that are or become applicable to Lessee, and the Lease Premises with respect to: (a) the protection, preservation, or clean-up of the environment, wildlife, habitat, or natural resources; (b) the use, treatment, storage, transportation, handling, or disposal of Hazardous Materials; (c) the quality of the air and the discharge of airborne wastes, gases, particles, or other emissions; (d) the preservation or protection of waterways, groundwater, or drinking water; or (e) the health and safety of persons or property.
“Hazardous Materials” are any chemical, substance, material, controlled substance, object, condition, waste, living organism, or combination thereof that is or may be hazardous to human health or safety or to the environment due to its radioactivity, ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, explosivity, toxicity,

6.a
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 2 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, phytotoxicity, infectiousness, or other harmful or potentially harmful properties or effects, including, without limitation, tobacco smoke, petroleum and petroleum products, asbestos, radon, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and all of those chemicals, substances, materials, controlled substances, objects, conditions, wastes, living organisms, or combinations thereof that are now or become in the future listed, defined, or regulated in any manner by any Environmental Laws based on, directly or indirectly, such properties or effects.
“Improvements” are any modification, alteration, addition, or removal of any material and any other action that changes the condition of the Lease Premises from the natural state, whether situated above, on, or under the Lease Premises.

Improvements include any construction situated on or placement of material within the Lease Premises regardless of value.
“Lease” is this document together with all subsequent amendments and exhibits.
“Major Repairs” means any work that requires a permit or approval from other agencies, requires environmental review, or requires rebuilding or replacing any of the authorized Improvement(s).
“Mineral Resources” includes timber, crops, sand, oil, gas, hard rock minerals and other mineral deposits as defined in Public Resources Code section 6407. “Natural Resources” are all of the flora and fauna native to both the upland terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems within, and adjacent to, the lease premises.
“Public Trust” means the constitutional, statutory, and common law doctrine providing the state’s sovereign authority over the navigable waters of the state, including the tidelands and submerged lands underlying those waters that are held in trust for the benefit of all the people of the state and for purposes that include maritime or water-dependent commerce, navigation, fisheries, the preservation of lands in their natural state for scientific study, open space, wildlife habitat, and water-oriented recreation.
“Repairs” means work to maintain the Lease Premises and Improvements thereon in good, safe, and clean condition. Repairs are work that is minor in scope, do not require obtaining permits, approvals, or authorizations from other agencies, such as building permits, and do not require environmental review under State or Federal environmental laws.

6.a
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 3 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) Paragraph 2: Rent

2.1. Absolute Triple Net Lease. This Lease is an absolute triple net lease, meaning Lessor has no obligation with respect to the payment of taxes, insurance, the cost of maintenance, utilities, repairs, or other costs or obligations associated with the Leased Premises, except as expressly stated herein.

2.2. Payment of Rent. Lessee must pay rent annually, on or before each anniversary of this Lease unless this Lease specifies a different rent schedule. The first installment is due on the beginning date of this Lease or within 60 days of Lessor authorizing the Lease at a public meeting, whichever is later. Rent is due each year in advance. Should Lessee submit payments that are less than the full amount of rent due under this Lease, Lessor may provide a supplemental billing invoice. Rent will not be refunded or prorated if Lessee discontinues use of the Lease Premises during the term.

2.3. Place for Payment. All payments under this Lease must be submitted to Lessor’s principal office as specified in this Lease. Lessee may contact Lessor’s accounting staff for Lessor’s current practices for payment by credit card or electronic fund transfer.

2.4. Courtesy Invoices. Lessor may send courtesy invoices to the address on file for Lessee at least thirty (30) days before a rent payment is due. Lessor’s failure to, or delinquency in, providing invoices will neither excuse Lessee from paying rent nor extend the time for paying rent. If Lessor does not send a courtesy invoice, Lessee must submit rent in the amount of the prior year’s rent when due and contact Lessor within thirty (30) days to determine the balance due.

2.5. Penalties and Interest. Penalties for late payments of any amounts due under this Lease and interest thereon are as provided in Title 2, California Code of Regulations section 1911(b). Timeliness of receipt of remittances shall be as provided in Title 2, California Code of Regulations section 1911(a).

2.6. Annual Adjustment of Rent. The rent specified in Section 1 of this Lease will be adjusted annually by the Consumer Price Index as specified in Title 2, California Code of Regulations section 1900(m) & (n) unless otherwise specified in this Lease.

2.7. Review of Non-Monetary Consideration. If rent is discounted or waived pursuant to Title 2, California Code of Regulations section 2003(e)(4), Lessor may review such determination at any time and set a monetary rental. Lessee shall be given at least thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the date of the Commission

6.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 4 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) meeting wherein the rent modification is considered, or thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the effective date that the rent is changed, whichever provides more notice.

2.8. Periodic Rent Review. Lessor may modify the method, amount, or rate of consideration effective on each tenth anniversary of the beginning date of this Lease, in addition to the last two years of the Lease as provided in Provision 14.4 below. Lessor shall consider the factors provided in Title 2, California Code of Regulations section 2003(d) when determining whether a rent modification is appropriate and which rental method listed in section 2003(a) should apply.

Should Lessor fail to exercise such right effective on any tenth anniversary, it may do so on any one (1) of the next nine (9) anniversaries following such tenth anniversary, without prejudice to its right to modify rent on the next or any succeeding tenth anniversary of the beginning date. No such modification shall become effective unless Lessee is given at least thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the date of the Commission meeting wherein the rent modification is considered or thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the effective date of the increase, whichever provides a greater notice period.

2.9. If Lessor elects to prepare an appraisal to establish a new rent, Lessee may, at its option, also provide a timely independent appraisal at its sole expense for Lessor’s review and consideration. Prior to Lessee’s contracting for such appraisal, Lessor and Lessee shall negotiate in good faith and agree upon the terms and conditions for such third-party appraisal, including but not limited to the highest and best use, appraisal methodology, and minimum appraiser credentials. Such appraisal shall be prepared in accordance with generally accepted and applicable appraisal standards as they are adopted from time to time by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation, and Lessor’s Appraisal Guidelines.

2.10. Books and Records. Lessee must keep and maintain full and accurate accounting books and records of transactions from the Lease Premises in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for at least the five (5) prior years. The accounting books and records kept and maintained by Lessee for audit purposes must include all records, receipts, journals, ledgers, and documents reasonably necessary to enable Lessor or its auditors to perform a complete and accurate audit of gross sales and exclusions from gross sales in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Lessee must also maintain an original receipt for the payment of taxes, assessments, or installments and deliver such to Lessor upon request.

6.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 5 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

2.11. Report of Gross Income. On Lessor’s request, Lessee must submit a Report of Gross Income on a form provided by Lessor for the prior five (5) years. This report together with supporting documentation (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Income Reports”) must include all business operations located on or over the Lease Premises. The gross income of sublessees and all others generating income on the Lease Premises must be reported separately and with sufficient organization and detail so that Lessor can identify the source of all gross income generated on the Lease Premises.

2.12. Audits. On not less than ten (10) days' prior written notice to Lessee, Lessor may cause an audit to be made of the Income Reports and all of Lessee's records and accounting books necessary (in Lessor’s judgment) to audit such items. Lessee will make all such books and records available for the audit at the Lease Premises or at Lessor’s offices. If the audit discloses an underpayment of Rent, Lessee will immediately pay to Lessor the amount of the underpayment with "Interest" (as provided in Paragraph 2.5), which will accrue from the date the payment should have been made through and including the date of payment. If the audit discloses an underreporting of rent in excess of two percent (2%) of the reported Gross Income, then Lessee will also immediately pay to Lessor all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the audit and in collecting the underpayment, including auditing costs and attorney fees. If the audit discloses an overpayment of Rent, Lessee will be entitled to a credit in the amount of the overpayment against the next rent payment(s).

Paragraph 3: Surety

3.1. Lessee to Obtain Surety. Lessee shall provide a surety bond or other security device acceptable to Lessor when required by Section 1 of this Lease. Such security shall be for the specified amount, name the State of California, California State Lands Commission, as the assured, and guarantee to Lessor the faithful observance and performance by Lessee of all the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease.

3.2. Lessor’s Modification of Surety. Lessor may require an increase in the amount of the surety bond or other security device to cover any additionally authorized Improvements, any modification of consideration, or to provide for inflation or other increased need for security. The surety bond or other security device may be increased: (i) if any additional Improvements or activities are authorized on the Lease Premises; (ii) if Lessee modifies any existing Improvements such that the cost for removal of such Improvements is increased; (iii) when a periodic rent

6.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 6 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) review is conducted under section 2.8; (iv) on each fifth anniversary of this Lease, (v) Lessor determines it is in the best interest of the state; (v) within the last two years of the Lease. Should Lessor fail to exercise such right effective on any fifth anniversary, it may do so effective on any one of the next four anniversaries without prejudice to its right to modify the surety on the next fifth anniversary or as otherwise provided above. Lessor will provide at least thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the date of the Commission meeting wherein the modification of the surety is considered, or thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the effective date of the increase.

3.3. Lessee’s Modification of Surety. Any security device required under this Lease must be maintained at all times during the Lease term. Lessee must first seek approval of Lessor before changing the surety holder or the type of security device used.

Paragraph 4: Insurance

4.1. Lessee Must Insure Lease Premises. Lessee must obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Lease comprehensive general liability insurance and property damage insurance against any and all claims or liability arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy, condition, or maintenance of the Lease Premises and all Improvements. The coverage limit must be no less than the amount specified in Section 1 of this Lease.

4.2. Insurance Policy Requirements. The insurance policy must identify the Lease by its assigned number. The coverage provided must be primary and noncontributing. Lessee must keep such policy current. Lessor must be named as a “certificate holder” or an “additional interest” on the policy. Lessee must provide Lessor with a current certificate of insurance at all times. At Lessor’s request, Lessee must provide a full copy of the current insurance policy, along with any and all endorsements or other such documents affecting the coverage. Lessor will not be responsible for any premiums or other assessments on the policy.

4.3. Notice to Lessor. Lessee shall notify Lessor within five (5) business days if the insurance is canceled for any reason and shall act diligently to replace the insurance. Failure to timely replace the insurance may result in a default of the lease.

4.4. Modification. Lessor may require an increase in the amount of the insurance to cover any additionally authorized Improvements, any modification of consideration, or to provide for inflation or other increased need. Insurance coverage may be increased: (i) if any additional Improvements or activities are

6.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 7 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) authorized on the Lease Premises; (ii) if Lessee modifies any existing Improvements or intensity of use; (iii) when a periodic rent review is conducted under section 2.8; (iv) on each fifth anniversary of this Lease; (v) Lessor determines it is in the best interest of the state; (vi)within the last two years of the Lease. Should Lessor fail to exercise such right effective on any fifth anniversary, it may do so effective on any one of the next four anniversaries without prejudice to its right to modify insurance requirements on the next fifth anniversary. Lessor will provide at least thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the date of the Commission meeting wherein the modification of insurance is considered, or thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the effective date of the increase.

Paragraph 5: Taxes, Assessments, and Fees

5.1. Revenue and Tax Code Section 107.6 Statement. Issuance of this Lease creates a possessory interest that may be subject to property taxation. The Lessee may be subject to, and is solely responsible for, any possessory interest taxes levied on the leasehold interest.

5.2. Lessee to Pay All Taxes, Assessments, and Fees. In addition to any Rent due under this Lease, Lessee must pay when due all real and personal property taxes imposed on or associated with the Lease Premises during the term of this Lease.

This includes, without limitation: possessory interest taxes, assessments, special assessments, user fees, and service charges. If this Lease begins or ends during a tax year, Lessee must pay the taxes, assessments, and fees for the portion of the tax year the Lease was in effect.

5.3. Reimbursement Agreements. Lessee must pay in full any amount owed on the Application Reimbursement Agreement within 30 days of invoice.

5.4. Records of Payments. Lessee shall keep the official and original receipt for payments required by this paragraph 5 and provide to Lessor upon request.

Paragraph 6: Land Use

6.1. Only Authorized Uses. Lessee will use the Lease Premises only for the purposes stated in this Lease. Any additional uses or Improvements require separate authorization from Lessor. Lessee must submit a separate application to Lessor to amend this Lease if Lessee intends to add to or alter the Improvements on, or change the uses of, the Lease Premises.

6.2. Lessee to Comply with All Applicable Laws. Lessee, at Lessee’s sole expense, will comply with all Applicable Laws. Lessee must give Lessor immediate written notice on Lessee’s becoming aware that the use or condition of the Lease

6.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 8 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) Premises is in violation of any Applicable Laws. Lessee must obtain and maintain all permits or other entitlements.

6.3. Lease Does Not Substitute for Permits. This Lease does not substitute for or provide preference in obtaining approval from other federal, state, or local agencies. Lessee is solely responsible for determining what approvals, authorizations, or certifications are required, and will be solely responsible for all costs incurred thereby.

6.4. No Discrimination. Lessee, in its use of the Lease Premises, must not discriminate against any person or class of persons on any basis protected by federal, state, or local law.

6.5. “As Is.” Lessee accepts the Lease Premises “as is” and acknowledges that:

6.5.1. Lessor, including its officers and employees, made no representations or warranties as to the suitability of the Lease Premises for any uses authorized under this Lease. Lessee is solely responsible for determining the suitability of the Lease Premises for any proposed use or Improvements; and

6.5.2. Lessor, including its officers and employees, has made no representations or warranties as to the quality or value of any Improvements found on the Lease Premises, or of their conformity to Applicable Laws. Lessee agrees to inspect any preexisting Improvements at its own cost to determine whether such Improvements are safe and suitable for the Lessee’s intended use; and

6.5.3. Damage to or destruction of any Improvements on the Lease Premises by any cause whatsoever does not entitle Lessee to any reduction in rent or extension of this Lease; and

6.5.4. Any Improvements on the Lease Premises are considered personal property and not fixtures; and

6.5.5. Lessee accepts the hazards involved in using or improving such lands.

Lessor is not responsible for any damages or reduced use of the Lease Premises caused by: local or invasive flora or fauna, flooding, erosion, climate change, sea level rise, storms, freezing, inclement weather of any kind, acts of god, maintenance or failure of protective structures, and any other such hazards.

Lessee will not be reimbursed or receive offset of rent for such hazards; and

6.5.6. The Lease Premises may be subject to pre-existing contracts, leases, licenses, easements, encumbrances, and claims. The Lease is made without warranty by Lessor of title, condition, or fitness of the land for the stated or intended purpose.

6.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 9 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

6.6. Uses Inconsistent with the Public Trust Prohibited. Unless specifically authorized in this Lease, any use of the Lease Premises which is inconsistent with the Public Trust is prohibited when the Lease Premises are lands subject to the Public Trust.

Paragraph 7: Climate Change

7.1. Lessee acknowledges that the Lease Premises and adjacent upland may be subject to the hazards exacerbated by climate change, including sea level rise. Potential hazards to the Lease Premises from climate change include but are not limited to flood damage, erosion damage, earthquakes, tsunamis, and damage from waves and storm-created debris. Lessee acknowledges that these impacts associated with climate change may require additional adaptation or protection strategies applied to the improvements on the Lease Premises and additional maintenance.

7.2. Lessee assumes the risks associated with such potential hazards and agrees to be solely responsible for all damages, costs, and liabilities arising as a result of the impacts of such hazards on the Lease Premises. Any additional maintenance or protection strategies necessitated by such hazards may be subject to environmental review and require additional approval by the Lessor.

7.3. Lessee shall conduct monitoring reports within the first three years of lease execution or construction, and at five-year intervals thereafter for the life of the project; and shall also provide Lessor with monitoring reports following any extreme event, including, but not limited to: extreme tide event (including King Tides), earthquake, or tsunami that results in the declaration of a Local Emergency or a State of Emergency (as defined in Cal. Gov. Code § 8558) or a federal Emergency or Major Disaster (as defined in 44 C.F.R. § 206.2).

Paragraph 8: Environmental Matters

8.1. Lessee to Comply with Environmental Laws. Lessee, at its sole cost and expense, will comply with all Environmental Laws.

8.2. Hazardous Materials. Lessee will immediately notify Lessor of any known violation of any Environmental Laws, along with any action, claim, demand, inquiry, or order relating to a violation of Environmental Laws on the Lease Premises. Lessee must immediately provide copies of all related documents upon Lessor’s request. Lessee must immediately notify Lessor and the appropriate governmental emergency response agency, or agencies in the event of any release or threatened release of any Hazardous Material on or about the Lease

6.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 10 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) Premises.

8.3. Cleanup of Hazardous Materials. If Hazardous Materials are located on or released onto or about the Lease Premises due to Lessee’s activities on the Lease Premises, the Lessee is responsible for the cleanup and disposal of such Hazardous Materials consistent with all Applicable Laws. Lessee must submit a site assessment and removal/remediation plan prepared by a professional, licensed and qualified to remove or remediate the Hazardous Materials for review and approval by Lessor. If Lessor approves the plan in writing, Lessee must commence the removal/remediation at its sole expense, in conformance with all Applicable Laws. Alternately, Lessor may elect to perform the removal/remediation at Lessee’s expense. Lessee must compensate Lessor for the actual cost of the removal/remediation within thirty (30) days of receiving a written invoice from Lessor.

8.4. Inspection. Lessee will permit Lessor or its agents to enter the Lease Premises on 24-hour notice to inspect, monitor, or take remedial action with respect to Hazardous Materials. If Hazardous Materials are generated, stored, or transported on the Lease Premises, Lessor may require Lessee to conduct an independent environmental site assessment or inspection for the presence or suspected presence of Hazardous Materials. If this assessment or inspection is required, Lessor will be allowed to review and approve the contractor, and the work will be done at Lessee’s expense.

8.5. Conservation. Lessee will cooperate with and participate in conservation programs for water, electricity, composting, natural gas and recycling programs, including those for the collection of cardboard, metals, plastics, and glass at Lessee’s expense.

Paragraph 9: Repairs, Major Repairs, and Alterations

9.1. Lessee Required to Perform Repairs. Lessee is solely responsible for maintaining the Lease Premises, including all Improvements, in good order and repair and in a clean, safe, sanitary, and orderly condition. Lessee is not required to get Lessor’s advanced approval for routine Repairs.

9.2. Major Repairs Require Lessor Approval. Lessee must obtain Lessor’s advanced written approval prior to conducting any Major Repairs. The decision whether a Repair is a Major Repair, and the decision whether a lease amendment is necessary, will be made by Lessor and based on the scope, cost, and impacts of the work.

6.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 11 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

9.3. Alterations Require Lessor Approval. Any material change in the size, scope, density, type, nature, or intensity of Improvements on or uses of the Lease Premises from what is authorized in this Lease will be considered an Alteration.

Lessee may not conduct any Alterations without a modification of this Lease approved by Lessor. The decision whether a change constitutes an Alteration will be made by Lessor and based on the individual facts.

9.4. Improvements in Disrepair or Unsafe Condition. Lessee’s failure to maintain the Lease Premises or Improvements that have become unsafe or derelict entitle Lessor to require removal under Paragraph 14. After providing notice and opportunity to cure, Lessor may require submission of a written plan to restore the Lease Premises under Paragraph 14. Lessee’s failure to comply shall entitle Lessor to terminate this Lease, remove the Improvements from the Lease Premises and recover the costs incurred in doing so from the Lessee.

Paragraph 10: Lessor’s Reservation of Rights

10.1. Non-Exclusive Lease. Lessee’s right of occupancy is non-exclusive. Lessee may control access to the Improvements on the Lease Premises. Unless otherwise stated in this Lease, Lessee may exclude persons from the Lease Premises only when their presence or activity constitutes a material interference with the Authorized Use of the Lease Premises.

10.2. Lessee Responsible for Impacts to Natural Resources and Public Trust Uses.

When the Lease Premises include school lands or sovereign lands, the Lessee is responsible for any damage or adverse impacts to Natural Resources within or adjacent to the Lease Premises. It is the intention of Lessor to limit the transfer of rights under this lease to the minimum level required to carry out the primary purpose of the Lease. Lessee’s use of the Lease Premises must minimize impacts to the Public Trust if the Lease Premises are subject to the Public Trust. Lessee must not interfere with public access or Public Trust uses authorized under statute and common law.

10.3. Mineral Resources. Mineral Resources may not be removed from the Lease Premises unless specifically authorized under this Lease. Lessee shall not extract, sell, damage, or use Mineral Resources found within the Lease Premises without specific authorization under this Lease. Lessor reserves the right to grant and transfer Mineral Resources along with the right to grant leases to third parties in and over the Lease Premises for the extraction of such Mineral Resources. Such leasing will not be inconsistent or incompatible with the rights or privileges of Lessee under this Lease.

6.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 12 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

10.4. Right to Inspect. Lessor reserves the right to inspect the Lease Premises. If access to the Lease Premises is reasonably accomplished by passing through adjacent property owned by Lessee, Lessor shall provide 24-hour notice prior to entry and Lessee shall grant such entry for inspection of the Lease Premises.

10.5. Statutory Reservations. Lessor reserves to the public an easement across the Lease Premises complying with Public Resources Code section 6210.4 and Public Resources Code section 6210.5.

10.6. Multiple Overlapping Leases Allowed. Lessor reserves the right to lease, convey, or encumber the Lease Premises, in whole or in part, during the Lease term for any purpose not inconsistent or incompatible with the rights or privileges of Lessee under this Lease.

Paragraph 11: Indemnity

11.1. Lessee’s Sole Risk. Lessee’s use of the Lease Premises and any Improvements thereon, including use by guests and invitees, is at Lessee’s sole and exclusive risk.

11.2. Lessee to Indemnify Lessor. Except to the extent caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Lessor, Lessee shall indemnify, hold harmless, and, at the option of Lessor, defend Lessor, its officers, agents, and employees from any and all Damages resulting from Lessee’s occupation and use of the Lease Premises. Lessee shall reimburse Lessor in full for all reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees, specifically including, without limitation, any Damages arising by reason of: (1) The issuance, enjoyment, interpretation, or breach of this Lease; (2) The challenge to or defense of any environmental review upon which the issuance of this Lease is based; (3) The death or injury of any person, or damage to or destruction of any property from any cause whatever in any way connected with the Lease Premises, or with any of the Improvements or personal property on the Lease Premises; (4) The condition of the Lease Premises, or Improvements on the Lease Premises; (5) An act or omission on the Lease Premises by Lessee or any person in, on, or about the Lease Premises; (6) Any work performed on the Lease Premises or material furnished to the Lease Premises; (7) Lessee’s failure to comply with any Applicable Laws or violation of any Environmental Laws; (8) The costs for any cleanup or other response costs relating to the release or threatened release of Hazardous Materials on the Lease Premises during Lessee’s occupation of the Lease Premises. This obligation includes any prior leases between Lessee and Lessor and will continue until Lessee has performed all duties under Paragraph 14.

6.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 13 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

11.3. Lessor Not Required to Defend. Lessor need not defend itself against all or any aspect of any challenge to this Lease or any associated environmental review. However, Lessee may take whatever legal action is available to it to defend this Lease or any associated environmental review against any challenge by a third party, whether or not Lessor chooses to raise a defense against such a challenge.

11.4. Lessee to Notify Lessor. Lessee shall notify Lessor immediately in case of any accident, injury, or casualty on the Lease Premises.

Paragraph 12: Assignment, Encumbrance, or Sublet

12.1. Lessor’s Consent Required for Assignment. Lessee shall not mortgage; hypothecate; encumber; assign; sublet; enter into franchise, license, or concession agreements; or otherwise transfer all or part of this Lease (collectively “Assign” or “Assignment”) without Lessor’s advanced and expressed consent at a properly noticed public meeting. Any purported Assignment without Lessor’s consent will be void and of no force or effect and will not confer any estate or benefit on anyone. A consent to one Assignment by Lessor will not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent Assignment by or to any other party.

12.2. Lessee Actions Not Considered Assignments. If Lessee is a public corporation whose stock is traded on a nationally recognized stock exchange, sale or transfer of such stock is not an Assignment.

12.3. Procedures. If Lessee desires to Assign this Lease, Lessee will apply to Lessor for the proposed Assignment. The Assignment will be considered by Lessor at a public meeting. Lessor may require any of the following in considering consent of an Assignment: (a) the nature, effective date, terms, and conditions of the assignment; (b) a description of the identity, net worth, and previous business experience of the proposed assignee; (c) a complete business plan prepared by the proposed assignee; and (d) any further information relevant to the proposed Assignment that Lessor reasonably requests. Lessor may either (i) consent to the proposed Assignment; (ii) refuse to consent to the proposed Assignment; or (iii) determine that it is preferable to terminate this Lease and issue a new lease to the proposed assignee.

12.4. Standard for Consent. Lessor may refuse its consent to the proposed Assignment on any reasonable grounds. Reasonable grounds include, without limitation: (a) the proposed assignee intends to use the Lease Premises for different activities or uses than those set forth in Section 1; (b) the proposed assignee’s financial condition is deemed by Lessor to be inadequate to support

6.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 14 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) the financial and other obligations of Lessee under this Lease; (c) the business reputation or character of the proposed assignee is not reasonably acceptable to Lessor; (d) the proposed assignee is not likely to conduct a business of a quality substantially equal to that conducted by Lessee; (e) the proposed assignee’s planned use of the Lease Premises would increase the burden on the Lease Premises, involve an increased risk of the presence, use, release, or discharge of Hazardous Materials; or (f) Lessor has not received adequate assurance that all breaches will be cured before the effective date of the proposed Assignment.

12.5. Additional Terms. Lessee’s Assignment of the Lease does not release Lessee from liability for any Hazardous Materials or ordinance manufactured, generated, used, placed, disposed, stored, or transported on the Lease Premises during Lessee’s tenancy. An unauthorized assignment does not relieve Lessee from its covenants and obligations under this Lease. Lessor’s acceptance of any payment due under this Lease from any person other than Lessee will not be deemed to be a waiver by Lessor of any provision of this Lease or to be a consent to any Assignment.

12.6. Bankruptcy. If Lessee files a petition or an order for relief is entered against Lessee under the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 101, et seq.), then the trustee or debtor-in-possession must elect to assume or reject this Lease within sixty (60) days after filing of the petition or appointment of the trustee, or as that deadline may be extended by order of the court, or the Lease shall be deemed to have been rejected and Lessor shall be entitled to immediate possession of the Lease Premises. No assumption or assignment of this Lease shall be effective unless it is in writing and unless the trustee or debtor-in-possession has cured all breaches of this Lease (monetary and non-monetary) or has provided Lessor with adequate assurances (a) that within ten (10) days from the date of such assumption or assignment, all monetary breaches of this Lease will be cured; and (b) that within thirty (30) days from the date of such assumption, all non-monetary breaches of this Lease will be cured; and (c) that all provisions of this Lease will be satisfactorily performed in the future.

12.7. Permitted Assignments. The following Assignments are permitted under this Lease without Lessor’s consent: (a) Assignment caused by the death of a spouse where the full interest of the deceased spouse is Assigned to a surviving spouse who is a co-lessee on this Lease, provided Lessor is notified in writing within thirty (30) days of the assignment; (b) assignment caused by the dissolution of the marriage of Lessee when the full interest of one spouse is assigned to the other

6.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 15 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) spouse who is a co-lessee on this Lease, provided Lessor is notified in writing within thirty (30) days of the transfer; and (c) substitution or succession of a new trustee if the Lease is held in trust and the Lessee is a trustee or successor trustee thereof, provided Lessor is notified in writing no later than sixty (60) days after the named trustee as appears on the face of this Lease becomes unable or ceases to serve as trustee for any reason.

12.8. Lessee Remedies. If Lessor withholds or conditions its consent and Lessee believes that Lessor did so contrary to the terms of this Lease, then Lessee’s sole remedy will be to prosecute an action for declaratory relief to determine if Lessor properly withheld or conditioned its consent, and Lessee hereby waives all other remedies.

Paragraph 13: Breach

13.1. Events of Breach. All covenants and agreements contained in this Lease are declared to be conditions to this Lease. Lessee’s failure to pay rent when due or any other charges under this Lease for five (5) days after written notice from Lessor to Lessee will be considered a monetary breach. Lessee’s failure to perform any other promise, covenant, or agreement under this Lease for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from Lessor to Lessee will be considered a non-monetary breach. If a non-monetary breach cannot be cured within the thirty (30)-day period, the breach will be deemed to be cured if Lessee begins to cure the breach within the thirty (30)-day period and continues to diligently complete the cure.

13.2. Breach of Lease. Lessor shall provide written notice to Lessee specifying the particulars of the breach. Should Lessee fail to cure the breach within the period specified in Paragraph 13.1, then Lessor may elect to pursue any available remedies under law, or those specified in paragraph 13.3, below.

13.3. Remedies on Breach of Lease. In addition to any other rights or remedies at law or equity, Lessor may, without further notice, (a) terminate this Lease, reenter and take possession of the Lease Premises and remove all persons and all Improvements therefrom at Lessee’s cost; or (b) keep this Lease in effect without declaring this Lease terminated and without terminating Lessee’s right to possession, reenter the Lease Premises and occupy the whole or any part for and on account of Lessee and collect any unpaid rentals and other charges that have become payable or that may thereafter become payable; or (c) terminate this Lease after reentering the Lease Premises as provided in subclause (b) above. Any notice required to be given by Lessor above will be

6.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 16 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) instead of, and not in addition to, any notice required under the laws of the State of California.

13.4. Determination of Rental Value. If rent under this Lease is calculated as percentage of Lessee’s income attributable to the Lease Premises and Lessee abandons the Lease Premises, then the reasonable rental value shall be the percentage of proceeds Lessor would have received had Lessee operated the Lease Premises in the usual and customary manner.

13.5. Acceptance of Rent When Lessee is in Breach. Lessor’s acceptance of any rent shall not be considered a waiver of any preexisting Breach by Lessee other than the failure to pay the particular rent accepted regardless of Lessor’s knowledge of the preexisting Breach at the time rent is accepted, unless the breach was a monetary breach and the payment occurs during the cure period specified in Paragraph 13.1.

13.6. Acceptance of Payments After Lease Termination. Lessee’s submission or Lessor’s acceptance of any payments after the expiration or termination of this Lease shall not reinstate or extend this Lease. Lessor may elect to retain any payment submitted and apply these payments to offset any damages claimed against Lessee; or Lessor may elect to allow a holdover tenancy under Paragraph 14.6; or Lessor may elect to refund the payments less a reasonable handling fee.

13.7. Waiver of Rights. The failure or delay of either party to exercise any right or remedy shall not be construed as a waiver of such right or remedy or any Breach by the other party.

Paragraph 14: Conditions of Lease Termination

14.1. Use of State Land. This Lease authorizes the use or occupation of state land for a fixed term of years without options or rights of renewal. Lessee accepts that future leases authorizing the continued existence of any Improvements constructed or maintained by Lessee on the Lease Premises are subject to a discretionary action of the California State Lands Commission. Submission of an application for a new lease does not guarantee a new lease will be granted to Lessee. Lessee acknowledges that construction of Improvements on the Lease Premises and investment in or obtaining financing for the uses authorized under this Lease is done in full understanding that future leases are not guaranteed.

Lessee also affirmatively represents that the cost of removing Improvements was considered before entering into this Lease and placing or assuming any Improvements on state land.

6.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 17 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

14.2. Abandonment. Lessee’s right of access to the Lease Premises was a material consideration in Lessor issuing this Lease. If, without prior notice to Lessor, Lessee sells, abandons, or loses title to the upland property adjacent to the Lease Premises, or otherwise loses the legal right to access the Lease Premises, Lessor may deem this an abandonment of the Lease Premises. Lessee must actively maintain and manage any Improvements authorized by this Lease. Should Lessee discontinue use, management, or maintenance of the authorized Improvements, Lessor may deem this an abandonment and elect to terminate the Lease. Alternately, Lessor has the remedy described in California Civil Code section 1951.4 (Lessor may continue lease in effect after Lessee’s breach and abandonment and recover rent as it becomes due if Lessee has right to sublet or assign, subject only to reasonable limitation). Abandonment of the Lease Premises shall not relieve Lessee of any obligations under this Lease.

14.3. Restoration. In issuing this Lease it is Lessor’s understanding that all Improvements will be removed from state land at the expiration or termination of this Lease. If Lessee abandons the Lease Premises, or Lessor terminates this Lease, or this Lease expires without execution of a new lease authorizing Lessee’s use of the Lease Premises, Lessee must: 1) remove all Improvements regardless of whether Lessee constructed or placed Improvements together with all debris at its sole expense and risk, restoring the Lease Premises to as close as possible to an unimproved condition to Lessor’s satisfaction; and 2) immediately surrender possession of the Lease Premises. Lessor may, in its sole discretion, allow all or any portion of the Improvements to remain in place. In carrying out this obligation, Lessee acknowledges that further authorizations, review of the Restoration Plan, and environmental review may be necessary as outlined in Section 14.4 below.

14.4. Two Years Prior to Expiration. (A) If Lessee desires to continue the uses authorized under this Lease, Lessee shall submit an application together with all required fees at least two years prior to the expiration of this Lease. Submission of an application does not guarantee a new lease will be granted to Lessee. (B) If Lessee does not desire to occupy the Lease Premises beyond the term of this Lease, then two years prior to the expiration of this Lease, Lessee shall submit an application, including a detailed plan to remove all Improvements and restore the Lease Premises to the condition existing prior to the installation or construction of any Improvements. The plan must include a timeline for obtaining all necessary permits. The restoration plan may require a subsequent environmental review and approval from Lessor. (C) Lessor may modify annual

6.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 18 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) rent, surety and insurance within the last two years of the Lease.

14.5. Failure to Restore Lease Premises. Lessee’s failure to remove improvements, restore the Lease Premises, or surrender possession of the Lease Premises at the expiration or sooner termination of this Lease shall not constitute a renewal or extension and shall not give Lessee any rights in or to the Lease Premises or any part thereof. Lessee shall not be entitled to any compensation for Improvements left on the Lease Premises at the termination or expiration of this Lease. Lessor may, in its sole discretion, elect to treat the Improvements as abandoned and remove all or any portion of Improvements from the Lease Premises. Lessee’s failure to adequately restore the Lease Premises imposes significant financial liability on Lessor. As a result, Lessee shall be responsible for all expenses incurred by Lessor in restoring the Lease Premises, including, without limitation, staff time, environmental work or permitting, contractor costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees.

14.6. Holdover. This Lease terminates without further notice at the end of its term.

Lessor may, in its sole discretion, choose to accept Rent for the Lease Premises and allow a period of holdover tenancy. Any holdover tenancy shall be on a month-to-month basis. Lessee’s submittal of annual rent during holdover does not constitute tenancy longer than month-to-month. Any holdover tenancy shall be on the same terms as this Lease insofar as such terms can be applicable to a month-to-month tenancy. The rent for each month or any portion thereof during such holdover period is one hundred fifty percent (150%) of one-twelfth (1/12) of the total compensation for the most recent year paid. The month-to-month tenancy may be terminated by Lessor upon thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice to Lessee.

14.7. Holdover on Leases with No Monetary Consideration. In the event this Lease does not require monetary consideration, 14.6 shall continue to apply, and in addition: 1) Lessor shall have the right to establish rent based on the fair market value of the Lease Premises, and 2) In no way shall the prior lease consideration limit damages for trespass.

14.8. Quitclaim. In the event this Lease is terminated prior to expiration, Lessee shall deliver a quitclaim of all rights under this Lease to Lessor on request. Lessee shall execute and deliver such quitclaim to Lessor in a form provided by Lessor.

Should Lessee fail or refuse to deliver such a release, Lessor may record a written notice reciting such failure or refusal. This written notice shall, from the date of its recordation, be conclusive evidence against Lessee of the termination of this Lease and all other claimants.

6.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 19 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24) Paragraph 15: Additional Provisions

15.1. Conflict in Terms. In the case of any conflict between these General Provisions and Special Provisions found in Section 2, the Special Provisions control.

15.2. Boundaries. This Lease does not establish the State's boundaries in so far as it relates to land and resource jurisdiction and ownership and is made without prejudice to either party regarding any land and water boundary or title claims which may be asserted presently or in the future.

15.3. No Waiver. Lessor’s acceptance of a late or nonconforming performance shall not constitute a waiver unless such waiver is expressly acknowledged by Lessor in writing. Lessor’s delay in or omission to exercise any right under this Lease shall not constitute a waiver.

15.4. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Lease and each and all of its terms, covenants or conditions in which performance is a factor.

15.5. Notice. All notices required to be given under this Lease shall be given in writing, sent by U.S. Mail or other reputable private carrier with postage prepaid, to Lessor at the offices of the State Lands Commission and the Lessee at the address specified in this Lease. Lessor’s staff and Lessee may agree to accept any notice by electronic mail. Lessee shall give Lessor notice of any change in its name or address.

15.6. Consent. Lessor’s consent to one transaction or event shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent occurrence.

15.7. Changes. This Lease may only be amended, revised, or supplement by written agreement of the Parties.

15.8. Joint and Several Obligation. If more than one Lessee is a party to this Lease, the obligations of the Lessees shall be joint and several.

15.9. Captions. The section and paragraph captions used in this Lease are for the convenience of the Parties. The captions are not controlling and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of this Lease.

15.10. Severability. If any term, covenant, or condition of this Lease is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Lease shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Lease shall remain valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

6.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 20 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

15.11. Representations. Lessee agrees that no representations have been made by Lessor or by any person or agent acting for Lessor except those stated in this Lease. This document contains the entire agreement of the Parties. No verbal agreements, representations, warranties, or other understandings affect this Lease. Lessor and Lessee, as a material part of the consideration of this Lease, waive all claims against the other for rescission, damages, or otherwise by reason of any alleged covenant, agreement, or understanding not contained in this Lease.

15.12. Gender and Plurality. In this Lease, words importing any gender include any or all genders, and the singular number includes the plural whenever the context so requires.

15.13. Survival of Certain Covenants. All covenants pertaining to bond, insurance, indemnification, restoration obligations, breach or remedies shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease until Lessee has fulfilled all obligations to restore the Lease Premises as required by this Lease.

15.14. Counterparts. This agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different Parties in separate counterparts.

15.15. Delegation of Authority. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that Lessor as defined herein includes the Commission Members, their alternates or designees, and the staff of the Commission. The ability of staff of the Commission to give consent, or take other discretionary actions described herein will be as described in the then-current delegation of authority to Commission staff. All other powers are reserved to the Commission.

15.16. Successors. The terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns of the respective parties.
[Remainder of the page left intentionally blank.]

6.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 4899-0946-9075 v1
Section 3 General Provisions Page 21 of 22 Form 51.16 (Rev. 4/24)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - STATE LANDS COMMISSION
LEASE NUMBER: 4585
This Lease shall become effective only when approved by and executed on behalf of the State Lands Commission of the State of California and Lessee. The submission of this Lease by Lessor, its agent, or representative for examination by Lessee does not constitute an option or offer to lease the Lease Premises upon the terms and conditions contained herein, or a reservation of the Lease Premises in favor of Lessee. Lessee's submission of an executed copy of this Lease to Lessor shall constitute an offer to Lessor to lease the Lease Premises on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease as of the date hereafter affixed.

LESSEE:

CITY OF PACIFICA
By: _________________________________
Title: _________________________________
Date: ________________________________
LESSOR:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE LANDS COMMISSION
By: _________________________________
Robert Brian Bugsch
Title: Chief, Land Management Division
Date: ________________________________
Execution of this document was authorized by the California State Lands Commission on _______________________________.

ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGMENT

6.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission -

EXHIBIT A
LEASE 4585

LAND DESCRIPTION
A parcel of tide and submerged land, lying in the bed of the Pacific Ocean adjacent to Rancho San Pedro as shown on the approved plat dated February 26th, 1860, Santa Mateo County, State of California and more particularly described as follows:

Commencing at Standard City Monument on the centerline of Santa Rosa Avenue as shown on that Parcel Map filed August 22, 1985 in Book 56 of Parcel Maps at page 25, San Mateo County from which a Standard City Monument on said centerline bears South 89°58’50” East 525.15 feet; thence westerly along said centerline North 89°58’50” West 40.00 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Beach Boulevard; thence along the prolongation of the centerline of Santa Rosa Avenue

25.00 feet to the westerly line of Beach Boulevard and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 00°01’10” East 40.00 feet along said westerly; thence leaving said westerly line North 89°58’50” West 1030.00 feet; thence North 00°01’10” East 130.00; thence North 89°58’50” West 80.00 feet; thence South 00°01’10” West 210.00 feet; thence South 89°58’50” East 80.00 feet to said westerly line; thence North 00°01’10” East 40.00 feet along said westerly line to the POINT OF BEGINNING EXCEPTING THEREFROM any portion lying landward of the Ordinary High Water Mark of the Pacific Ocean.

END OF DESCRIPTION
PREPARED 2/04/2021 BY THE CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION BOUNDARY UNIT

6.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission -

6.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Lease 4585 Agreement with exhibits FINAL (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands Commission - 07/28/2006 14:04 6503557256 CALERA CREEK PAGE

STATE
STATE
LANDS

OF CALIFORNIA

COMMISSION
A
PUBLIC AGENCY PERMIT NO, 4585.9 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SERIES For such sole and exclusive purpose, and subject to such terms y 2on- ~ ditions A restrictions » reservations and limitations as are herein set forth:
“The State of California, hereinafter designated as the State » acting through the Stete Lands Commission and pursuant to the authori+ ty contained in Division 6,of the Public Resources Code and the rules and regulations adopted thereunder, does hereby grant a PERMIT to City of Pacifica

, State of California,

for a term of forty nine (lo) years,
beginning
_ June 1, 1911 and ending___
May 32, 2020
of » in and upon those certain tide and submerged lenós situate in the County of

| San Mateo 3 State of California, and more particu=
larly described and depicted on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached and by reference made a ‘pert nereot .
mis permit is subjectto existing contracts, leases, licenses, easenents , encumbrances and claims which may affect lessed premises, and this permit is made without vorranty by State of title, , “quiet enjoyment, condition or fitness of the leased ¿remises for the intended use, or any other werrenty whatever, except that Pemittee faithfully keeping all the terms , provisions and conditions of this permit on Permittee's part to be performed, State agrees not to interfere with Permittee's possession of the leased premises, except as herein may otherwise be - provided.
， This permit is not intended $0 constitute the establishment of thé State! & boundary and is to be without prejudice to any boundary claims which may * in the future be asserted.

AA
si.e
Rev, 12/69
61/86

6.b
Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands 07/28/2006 14:64 6563557256 CALERA CREEK PAGE 62/66
The sole and entire consideration to the State for the within permit shell be the public benefit, However, the State reserves the right to review the consideration et any time and to set a monetary rental if the State Lands Commission shall determine that such action is in the State's best interest.

Said lena shell be used only for the construction, operation and maintenance of

a public fishing pier, 30" diameter sanitary sewer outfall and seawall which shall in all respects comply with all epplisable laws, rules and regulations and shall in no wey interfere with nor obstruct navigation.

Said perwit ehall continue end shall remain in effect only so long as the land shall be used, utili d, And maintained for the purpose herein specified, and any time upon the discontínuance of such use and maintenance for a period of 180 days said permit shell, at the option of the State end upon written notice thereof to the permittee, cesse and terminate and the State shell have the right to forthwith re-enter upon and take possession of said land end at its option remove all, or any portion or portions, of ény structures, roadways and fils! from seid land at,the cost and expense of Said permittee.

The Stete expressly reserves the right to grant easements or crossings , over, upon and under the said demiseg right-of-way and nothing herein contained “shat be construed as limiting the powers of the State to lease, convey, O a otherwise transfer or encumber, during the life of this permit ell or any portion " Or portions of the hereinbefore described State lanás for any purpose whatsoever not inconsistent or incompatible with the rights or privileges granted to the said permittee,
There is reserved to the State all natural yesources, timber and minerals, including oil or gas in or above the described land, and the right to grent in, over and across said iands, leases, easements and/or rights-of-way to extract or remove such naturel resources » timber or minerals as provided by law and the rules and regulations of the State Lends Commission end without compensation to the said permittee,

Page 2 of 3 ends

51.2 6.b
Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands PAGE 63/06
07/28/2006 14:84 6503557256 CALERA CREEK
The Permittee shall be liable for and agrees to indemnify the State against any loss, damage, claim, demand or action, caused by, arising out of, or connected with the construction or maintenance of structures upon, or the use by the Permittee and/or agente thereof, of the demiged premises; | The Permittee shall not transfer nor assign this agreement and shall not sublet said land nor any part thereof, except upon the prior written consent of the Stete first had and obtained,
premises for the purpose of inspecting the leased lana.

This agreement will become binding on the State Only when duly executed on behalf of the State Lands Commission of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this sereement as of the date hereefter affixed,
THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS oF THE
‘HEREIN PERMIT ARE ACCEPTED: STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE COMMISSION
: Beto By MLZ AA

Gace
/
二
(Neme
KO
of Pemittee

ELE HU, Y

a 7 ft oF DL Latinas
: ” scopes Sigha
7”

ture A NO tus mm, € |

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
| COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
SS
DIN
July , A.D., 1971,
for the State ¢* California,
y personally
On this 9th day of
before me, the undersigned, e Notary Public in and
with principal office in the County of Sacramento
appeared James F. Trout
Known to me to be the Manager, State Lands Progran,
| the
of the
within
STATE
Instrument,
LANDS COMMISSION » STATE OF CALIFORNIA, the Commission that executed known to be the person who executed the within Instrument,

mission
on behalf
executed
of the
the
Commission there named, and acknowledged to me that such Comwith Instrument pursuant to a resolution of its Conmissionars, WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Een. PO At io
AN 2 让
SA 4
.
| z - 322117 PROS
REYNA L. SHAPI

Reyna Le Shapiro
一
NOTARY PUBLIG. CALIFORNIA Neme (Typed ‘Or Printed )

ACRAMENTO COUN
A
My Commission Expires Fab, AL NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATR AR rarTonenr

DET

6.b
Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands 07/28/2006 14:04 6503557256 CALERA CREEK PAGE 04/86
EXHIBIT "An
Lessee: City of Pacifica W 8933
the
Three
Sharp
parcels
Park
of
Area
tide and submerged land lying in the Pacific Ocean, within more particularly
of the City of Pacifica, San Mateo County, California,
described as follows:
' PARCEL A:
200
A strip
feet
of
on
tide
each
and
side
submerged land, the uniform width of 1,000 feet, lying
of the following described centerline:

BEGINNING at the intersection of the westerly line of Ocean Boulevard now known as Beach Boulevard with the centerline of Santa Rosa Avenue, as said Boulevard and Avenue are shown on the map entitled "REVISED MAP SALADA BEACH SAN MATEO CO., County
CAL." which map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of the page
of San Mateo on August 5, 1907, in Book 5 of Maps at .
line
20; thence westerly along the westerly prolongation of the center centerline.
of Santa Rosa Avenue 20 feet to the end of the herein deseribed PARCEL B:

A
feet
strip
on
of
each
tide and submerged land, the uniform width of 500 feet, lying 250 side of the following described centerline: -
COMMENCING at the above mentioned point of beginning of Parcel A; thence westerly along the westerly prolongation of the centerline of Santa Rosa Avemie 20 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
’
end
thence
of
continuing along the westerly prolongation 1,430 feet to the the herein described centerline.

PARCEL C:
‘A
feet
strip
on each
of tide
side
end submerged land, the uniform width of 100 feet; ‘lying 50 of the following described centerline:

A;
COMMENCING at the above mentioned point of beginning of Parcel centerline
thence westerly along the westerly prolongation of the
of Santa Rosa Avenue 1,450 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along the westerly prolongation 1,550 feet to the end of the herein described centerline, Y ae
AN Date:
= , 和一宁 - Prepared By: tonal”

Checked/Reviewed By: fiw

Date: W- 5-7;

Description Requested By se Fe DY TALARA OA?

6.b
Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands

wa y / Z
don ISUNOD Pag :

网 AT SN ‘ yt yee

SEN

de
os, AA Y
; | re Ni AN
. Ht NN el Tay,
Leeuw y 120 Ie
fa ¿ Roe
wiley
doe a oat oe
if SO
了 a 了 hh.

Ñ 】
i ae
E
PA ae, 2 一一一一一
e . 4 ase 2 - x
VETO A33%0 39vd 99/50 9S¢2S5S€8S9 eRe oe . po
9DOZ/8Z/L0 ba:bT
Nr,

6.b
Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands 6/06
07/28/2006 14:64 6503557256 CALERA CREEK PAGE @
Rad ha Ta bo.
z 5 Pal EA A nee C E
o
,
=

Resolution No. 71-71
A Resolution of the Council of the City of Pacifica
Approving the Execution of a Permit to Utilize a
Portion of Tidal and State Submerged Lands between
the City of Pacifica and the State of California, State Lands Commission ,
WHEREAS, the City of Pacifica has proposed to construct a fishing pier - marine outfall structure west of Beach Blvd. along the westerly extension of Santa Rosa Avenue within the Sharp Park Area of the Clty of Pacifica, and “WHEREAS , the City of Pacifica and the State Lands Commission of the State of California have mutually agreed that the construction of the pro- . posed fishing pier — marine outfall Structure is in the best interest of the citizens of the State of California as well as the citizens of the City of Pacifica, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica approves the public agency permit as prepared by the State Lands Commission between the City of Pacifica for 49-years duration beginning June 1, 1971' and ending May 31, year 2020.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Pacifica is hereby authorized to execute the subject permit between the City of Pacifica. and the State Lands Commission.

Passed and adopted at a meeting of the Council of the City of Pacifica. held on the l4rh day of June, 1971, by the following vote:

AYES, Counciimen: Farber, Minshew, Modena and Mayor MeCarthy NOES, Councilmen: None
ABSENT, Councilmen: Gust
ABSTAIN, Councilmen: None
: : £2 li E azi o
> |
COUNTY
Stave op
OF
cnLIroRNI
SAÑTRAYEO”
GZanEAe d. A AL E
pS Mayor E
ATTEST: ramo cr ot antes: SWATHE, Clty Clerk ofthe CHy of Pacifica,

6.b
Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: State Lands Commission Permit (Pier) 4840-2007-0129 v.1 (6161 : Approval of Lease Agreement with the California State Lands

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Swanson Architects for Design and Engineering Services related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Update.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution Authorizing a Consultant Services Agreement with Sally Swanson Architects for design and engineering services in the amount of $148,340.00 in connection to the ADA Self-Evaluation Transition Plan Update; approve budget authority in the amount of $163,174.00 which includes 10% contingency and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related with the plan.

STAFF CONTACT:

Roland Yip, P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer (650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director
(650) 446-4698
[email protected]
Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 501-6016
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The ADA provides civil rights protections to qualified individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, State and Local Government Services, and telecommunications. Passed in 1990, the ADA is a companion civil rights legislation to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Title II of the ADA requires public agencies to ensure their programs, services, and activities to individuals with disabilities.

This includes City-owned and operated facilities and infrastructure, public buildings, parks, parking lots, streets, sidewalks, curb ramps, and other elements within the public right-of-way.

The development of a transition plan is also a requirement of the federal regulations implementing the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which requires that all organizations receiving federal funds make their programs available without discrimination toward people with disabilities.

The City of Pacifica completed an ADA Transition Plan in 1995. On November 22, 2021, City Council approved an Addendum No 1 to the 1995 ADA Transition Plan. The purpose of the ADA Transition Plan Update is to allow the City to conduct an updated inventory of all City facilities and right-of-way. The ADA Transition Plan acts as a guidance document for the City to continue to meet federal ADA standards and will address any City facilities and right-of-way that 7 Packet Pg. 108
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026
are out of compliance to bring them up to current ADA standards. It serves as a long-term planning and budgeting tool to systematically address non-compliant conditions and to incorporate accessibility improvements into future capital improvement and maintenance projects.

Engineering Division Staff issued a Request for Proposal for the ADA Transition Plan Update. A total of thirty-six (36) consultant firms downloaded the project documents, and six (6) firms submitted proposals by the January 29, 2026 deadline:

1. Accessibility Consulting Partners, Inc

2. Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments, Inc

3. Disability Access Consultants, LLC

4. Independent Ergonomist DBA IHEALTH 360, LLC

5. Matrix Design Group, Inc

6. Sally Swanson Architects, Inc
Consultant proposal evaluations were conducted by staff from the Engineering Division. The proposals were scored based upon the consultants’ quality of proposal and responses to specific questions included in the RFP, experience of the proposer conducting similar work in California, relevant qualifications of key personnel assigned to this project, accessibility of key personnel to the City’s staff during the project, understanding of the City’s objectives, and reasonableness of fees and cost proposal.

Based upon the above criteria, Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) was selected by staff to proceed with the ADA Transition Plan Update. The cost estimate for the project is $148,340.

Staff recommend including a 10% contingency of $14,834.50 for any additional or unforeseen work needed.

SSA has been creating accessible environments by pairing deep expertise in ADA compliance with strong, place-making design for over 46 years. Their firm has completed ADA Transition Plans services for public agencies including the San Mateo County Harbor District, City of San Pablo, City of Santa Clara, City of Porterville, and City of Winters. Their work with these agencies has included full accessibility evaluations of public buildings, parks, harbors, and rights-of-way, and coordination of community outreach and engagement with disability-serving organizations. SSA’s in-house Certified Access Specialists support all phases of this work, from field assessments and barrier identification to development of clear Transition Plan recommendations tailored to each agency’s needs.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to authorize design of the ADA Transition Plan Update. However, this would delay staff’s ability to identify American Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act improvements that have not yet been completed. Staff does not recommend this alternate action.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of these actions is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Improve and steward City Infrastructure, streets, and facilities: Approval of the ADA Transition Plan Update will improve the city’s accessibility FISCAL IMPACT:
7 Packet Pg. 109
Pacifica City Council 3
March 09, 2026
Total Project Source and Use of Funds
Fund 101 - General Fund (FY 22-23) $100,000.00
Fund 101 - General Fund (FY 23-24) $50,000.00
Fund 101 - General Fund (See note below) $13,174.00
Total Source of Funds $163,174.00
Sharp Park PDA Resurfacing Project $148,340.00
Project Contingency, 10% $14,834.50
Total Use of Funds $163,174.00
The project is requesting an additional $13,174 to come from Fund 101 - General Fund. The General Fund receives around $12k a year for activity related to supporting Certified Access Specialists (CASp) services and can be applied to this eligible project. The additional funds are for the design contingency and any remaining funds after completion of the plan will go back to Fund 101 - General Fund.

ORIGINATED BY:

Engineering
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (PDF) 7 Packet Pg. 110
Pacifica City Council 4
March 09, 2026
RESOLUTION NO._______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PACIFICA AND SALLY

SWANSON ARCHITECTS FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $148,340 IN CONNECTION TO THE ADA TRANSITON PLAN UPDATE (ATTACHMENT 1); APPROVE BUDGET AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $163,174, WHICH INCLUDES CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED TEN PERCENT (10%) OF DESIGN CONTRACT AMOUNTS; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL

DOCUMENTS RELATED WITH THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City desires to move forward with the design of the ADA Transition Plan Update using General Capital Improvement funding in project 0326, along with the additional General Fund appropriation requested as per the staff report; and WHEREAS, the City evaluated Sally Swanson’s proposal, and is satisfied they can successfully complete the work and has been satisfied with their services on past City projects; and
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica authorizes the funding of Consultant Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and Sally Swanson Architects for design and engineering services in the amount of $148,340.00 in connection with the ADA Transition Plan Update, approves budget authority in the amount of $163,174.00, and authorizes the City Manager to execute all documents related with the project.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 9
th day of March, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

7.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Understanding
The City of Pacifica, a General Law City incorporated in 1957, with a population of approximately 40,000, is located in San Mateo County just twelve (12) miles south of San Francisco. Roughly 12.6 square miles, approximately one-half is publicly owned open space with panoramic views while several miles of coastal and ridge top trails tie Pacifica to neighboring communities.

Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) understands that the City of Pacifica seeks “a qualified entity or individual (“Company”) to provide ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan services”. One firm will be selected by the City to perform the services.

Project scope includes identifying potential noncompliant items and other physical barriers at City Rights-of-Way, buildings, recreational facilities and parking lots. Selected consultant will assist the City in developing the procedure and forms needed to conduct a Self-Evaluation in accordance with the guidelines and requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Consultant will provide evaluation services for site and program accessibility compliance to provide the basis for identification, prioritization, budgeting, and implementation of plans.

It is further understood that the “updated ADA Transition Plan” will be used by the City of Pacifica in its continuing effort to comply with accessibility requirements as required by the ADA and State of California Access codes. Selected consultant will also aid the City in monitoring implementation progress and compliance in future projects.

Approach
The best projects are collaborations.

The City of Pacifica Scope of Services as outlined in the General Solicitation released on January 5, 2026 is quite clear and SSA will meet or exceed all requirements of the contract. The project approach is flexible and will be tailored precisely to fit the City’s needs and resources.

Critical Elements
Following are the elements and benefits of the City’s manageable and living ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan document. The Access Compliance Assessment Survey will provide the City with:
• A list of existing accessibility barriers describing each barrier and recommendation of a removal solution
• A preliminary cost estimate for removal of each barrier • A priority assigned to each barrier
• A schedule for barrier removal
• Designation of a person responsible for barrier removal • The ability to “check-off” mitigated barriers
• The ability to easily demonstrate steps taken toward removal of all barriers to access.

The City of Pacifica project approach includes the following tasks:

Task 1. Project Management
a. Develop and maintain project schedule and budget
b. Project management tasks to include attending meetings, developing agendas, note-taking SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

7.2.A Statement of Understanding and Approach

7.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) c. Assist the City in project data management, documentation, and record keeping d. Provide periodic progress reports and presentations for staff, stake holders, and/or City Council
e. Facilitate Kick-Off, Interim Progress & Final Completion Online Meetings Upon award of the contract, Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) will begin planning, coordinating and scheduling a Project kick-off. Many project components discussed here regarding contacts, project schedule and communications will be agreed upon prior to an official project kick-off via email and phone conversations. SSA will manage its team including other administrative functions and overall Project activities consistent with the direction from the City of Pacifica in order to meet the Project schedule and budget during the course of services.

SSA will thoroughly review the City’s existing ADA Reports, municipal codes, master plans, programs, city contract language, and activities for compliance with ADA and Federal/State accessibility requirements.

SSA plans to attend at least four meetings with City staff, including an initial kick-off meeting; interim progress meetings will be at approximately 50%, 75%, and 90% completion. At the City’s direction, SSA will also attend and present the ADA Transition Plan to the City of Pacifica stakeholders and City Council at a separate public meeting. SSA will attend a kick-off meeting with the City to confirm the scope of work before advancing Tasks. SSA will coordinate and meet with the City, other government agencies and other affected parties as required throughout the duration of the Project. The SSA Project Team will arrange to meet via virtual conference technology, at the City’s discretion, with the City staff and other appropriate stakeholders to review, refine, and finalize the scope of work, programmatic evaluations, and completion schedules, as well as project communications, final deliverables and overall project strategies and goals.

Project Schedule
SSA will use Microsoft Project to develop schedules including critical tasks. SSA will prepare, monitor, and update progress schedule beginning at the kickoff meeting and ending at the City’s acceptance of the final report for the Project. Schedule will indicate significant milestones, targeted completion dates and the critical path for the Project. SSA will notify the City if there are delays in any phase or Task of the Project. In such cases, SSA will make up the schedule in subsequent Tasks of the Project. The schedule will be maintained and kept updated at all times and will be updated each time progress and milestones are changed. In addition, the progress schedule will be updated no less frequently than after each task is complete.

Invoicing
SSA will submit monthly invoice payments with a progress report summarizing partially or completed scope of work for processing. Any administrative time spent on invoicing shall be consumed by SSA’s overhead and not billed separately.

Quality Assurance, Quality Control, Challenges
QA/QC routines begin before the mission. It is the first management activity to ensure that a process, item, or service is of the quality expected by the user, as well as to create management controls thatddress planning, implementation and review of data collection activities. Subsequent QA/QC activities provide routines and consistency checks to ensure project integrity, correctness, and completeness.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Major challenges are generally not an issue in the conducting and coordinating of ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan projects. Rather, it is up to the consultant to communicate effectively with all stakeholders and assure that City of Pacifica staff is kept apprised of project status at timely intervals. SSA’s time-tested approach, honed over 46 years, ensures that stakeholders are fully informed.

Task 2. Conduct Self-Evaluation for City Policies, Programs, Services and Practices a. Thorough Review of City’s existing Policies, Plans, Reports, and Programs. b. Identify Programs and Services and Associated Policies and Procedures c. Selecting Key Personnel Including Orientation Meeting d. Staff Surveys Including Questionnaires
e. Draft Programmatic Self-Evaluation Survey Report
f. Final Programmatic Self-Evaluation Survey Report
SSA will identify and obtain all necessary documents and materials to conduct the audit process and survey. SSA will review existing City documentation, departmental and facility rules and regulations, planning documents and any other written policy documentation provided by the City and identified as relevant by SSA. SSA will assist the City in identifying the documents and materials needed for review that the City is to furnish and request such documents and materials from the City. The evaluation factors in current level of program accessibility, eligibility requirements, participation requirements, facilities used eligibility, staffing, transportation, communication, emergency procedures and grievance procedures for accessibility.

Selecting Key Personnel Including Orientation Meeting
SSA will coordinate with designated key City staff to orient staff with the Self-Evaluation process, including type of information that will be requested in staff surveys and how the information will be used for the Self-Evaluation. SSA will assist the City in identifying what staff/departments shall be considered as key staff to coordinate with. SSA meets with designated key City staff via virtual conference technology (at the City’s discretion) to orient staff on the Self-Evaluation process, including types of information that will be requested in staff surveys and how the information will be used for the Self-Evaluation. SSA understands that some survey respondents may not have in-depth knowledge of the ADA and accessibility concepts, and that some cities may have heightened sensitivity to this process. SSA ensures that, throughout the entire survey process, SSA is available to answer any questions, and work closely with the City to ensure maximum comfort and security with the process and results.

Example of Information Elicited and Reviewed
For example, SSA’s program access specialist reviews existing policies, procedures and practices pertaining to the City’s programs – both on-site and online – to ensure effective communication with members of the public, particularly individuals with disabilities. These recommendations and best practices will cover the appropriate types of auxiliary aids or services necessary to ensure effective communication with individuals with disabilities and will identify the most effective methods of:
• making aurally-delivered information available to individuals who are deaf or hard-of-hearing • making visually-delivered materials available to individuals who are blind or have low vision SSA will administer a staff survey to evaluate the level of program accessibility within each City department. SSA will be responsible to determine the format and contents of the survey in order to conduct a complete and comprehensive Self-Evaluation, however, it is anticipated that the staff survey will consider SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) such information as eligibility requirements, participation requirements, and facilities used, staff training, transportation, communications, notifications, public meetings, use of contracted services, purchasing, maintenance of accessible features, and emergency procedures.

SSA will submit a draft of the survey for City review, allow for comments, and then prepare final survey documents.

SSA will present draft survey questionnaires and record feedback from the City Team. SSA will plan and facilitate review meetings via virtual conference technology (at the City’s discretion) with the City staff as required to ensure their familiarity with the draft survey questionnaires under the plan and address any questions or comments in a timely manner.

SSA will incorporate all comments and prepare final survey documents. SSA will be fully responsible for distributing and collecting the survey and results; City will only provide administrative support on an as-needed basis upon request. SSA will notify the City if there is no responsiveness or delays in receiving surveys from City staff. SSA will also discuss with each staff member their responses to the survey questions.

Draft Programmatic Survey Reports
SSA will present draft Programmatic survey reports and record feedback from the City team. SSA will plan and facilitate review meetings via virtual conference technology with the City staff as required to assure their familiarity with the draft reports developed under the plan and address any questions or comments in a timely manner.

Final Programmatic Survey Reports
SSA will incorporate all Comments and Prepare Final Programmatic Survey Reports Task 3. Conduct Comprehensive City Facilities, Parks and Parking Lots Surveys and Barrier Assessments
a. Inventory Review
b. Plans/Diagrams with ADA barriers marked and labeled
c. Physical Surveys of City Facilities, Parks and Parking Lots (per the list provided in Appendices C, D, E)
d. Draft Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports e. Final Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports Public Buildings and Facilities
SSA will conduct surveys of all Public Buildings and Facilities and their path-of-travel on the inventory list to identify and locate all physical barriers to access. SSA will be responsible for determining and identifying the applicable accessibility standards and codes under which features will be measured and confirm the standards and codes with the City prior to performing the surveys. SSA will determine specific features to be surveyed as required and as applicable under the accessibility standards and codes. Field surveys of public buildings and facilities (including interiors, accessible parking, passenger drop-off and loading zones, pedestrian pathways, restrooms, etc.) shall include the collection and precise documentation of field data for accessibility elements at each site identified in the scope of work.

Field surveys of public buildings and facilities (including interiors, accessible parking, passenger drop-off SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) and loading zones, pedestrian pathways, restrooms, etc.) shall include the collection and precise documentation of field data for accessibility elements at each site identified in the scope of work. Field survey assessments will be done in the most unobtrusive manner possible to afford the least disruption to the City’s business. SSA field survey staff will use the applicable current code standards; the updated 2010 regulations of Title II of the ADA and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).

Parks and Parking Lots
SSA will conduct surveys of all parks and parking lots on the inventory list to identify and locate all physical barriers to access. SSA will be responsible for determining and identifying the applicable accessibility standards and codes under which features will be measured and confirm the standards and codes with the City prior to performing the surveys. SSA will determine specific features to be surveyed as required and as applicable under the accessibility standards and codes. Field surveys of parks and parking lots will include the collection and precise documentation of field data for accessibility elements at each site identified in the scope of work. For City parks and parking lots SSA will conduct surveys to include paths, parking lots, restrooms, amenities, sport and play areas to identify and locate all physical barriers to access. SSA field survey staff will use the applicable current code standards; the updated 2010 regulations of Title II of the ADA and the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).

SSA will prepare and present the Draft Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports for review and comment.

Once comments have been incorporated, the SSA will present the Final Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports.

Task 4. Conduct Comprehensive County Public Right-of-Way (PROW) Survey and Barrier Assessments
a. Inventory Review (128 linear miles of sidewalk, approximately 420 curb ramps, 3 pedestrian signals, and 10 bus stops in the City)
b. Physical Surveys of County PROW (per the Appendix A and the Q&A issued by the City) c. Draft Public Right-of-Way Access Compliance Assessment Reports d. Final Public Right-of-Way Access Compliance Assessment Reports Public Right-of-Way
Prior to performing the physical survey of Public Right-of-Way (PROW), SSA will prepare a rating system for the non-compliant items to facilitate identifying and cataloging the type and severity of distress to be used in data collection, which will be approved by the City prior to beginning the survey. SSA’s Accessibility Surveyors will collect the required information for the Public Rights-of-Way throughout the City.

A data collection checklist, based on ADA and DOT requirements as well as PROWAG recommendations, will be pre-programmed into handheld data collectors. Using traditional measuring and smart-level equipment, Accessibility Surveyors will enter data directly into the data collectors. SSA will use handheld computers to input measurements in the field and identify the precise geographic location of the pedestrian features. Data collection, data validation, and linking to location and digital photo files will happen automatically as the Accessibility Surveyors enter data and move from point to point. The Accessibility Surveyors will access the data entry and validation forms and aerial photography along with SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) right-of-way, utility, topographic, or other feature data sets pre-loaded on the data collectors for easy reference in the field. This is very important as the logistics for the day’s work will be identified on the map to keep the project on schedule and to minimize the possibility of missing an important feature in the field.

SSA will prepare and present the Draft Public Right-of-Way (PROW) Access Compliance Assessment Reports for review and comment.

Once comments are incorporated, then SSA will present the Final Public Right-of-Way (PROW) Access Compliance Assessment Reports.

Task 5. Community Engagement
a. Develop proposal and implementation timeline to engage the community in the ADA Transition Plan process
b. Specify the proposed number of meetings/workshops necessary to achieve a suitable engagement plan to meet the plan’s goals
c. Incorporate opportunities for public comment into phases of the planning process. Review and incorporate public comment and feedback into the Plan d. Specify other engagement tools and media that be utilized to implement community engagement
e. Develop public engagement materials including surveys, informational materials, and presentations
SSA will assist the City of Pacifica in hosting public outreach events, and soliciting input from stakeholders, per ADA §35.150(d)(1) during the development of the transition plan:
“…A public entity shall provide an opportunity to interested persons, including individuals with disabilities or organizations presenting individuals with disabilities, to participate in the development of the transition plan”

1. Administration Including Presentation, Agenda, Materials & Minutes Public Outreach Meeting Contingency Plan
While social distancing and sheltering in place have been the new normal, public vetting of the Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan is still required by law. Even if the world returns to ‘normal’ anytime soon, it’s likely that communities of people with disabilities may not want to attend in-person gatherings because they may be more susceptible to ongoing health issues.

In order to help the City to meet its legal obligations for public vetting of this Transition Plan, Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) proposes the following Virtual Town Hall Contingency Plan that can be implemented at the City’s discretion. The City may prefer in-person gatherings and SSA will comply with the City’s directive.

SSA will host in-person or “virtual” Town Halls along with online surveys that can be noticed to the public through the City’s marketing channels (e.g., websites, newsletters, email blasts).

Virtual Town Hall
• Set up virtual town hall meetings via Zoom Webinar (Microsoft Teams, or technology of the City’s choice).

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) • Anyone who wishes to participate will need to register (for security, to ensure participants can access, and to support subsequent follow-up if needed). • Zoom/Teams Town Hall meetings will feature ASL and live captioning provided by the City. • The City and SSA will co-facilitate the Town Halls, presenting an overview of Transition Plan findings and offering an opportunity for public comment. • SSA will moderate participation to ensure all questions are addressed, and all who wish to have an opportunity to comment are invited to do so.
• During Zoom Town Halls, participants will be invited to use video conference features such as:
o Raise hands (to make comments or ask questions).
o Chat box (to make comments or ask questions).
o Q&A.
• Meetings will be recorded and made available for later viewing, if the City wishes. • Anyone who is unable to attend may submit a public comment via email, in writing, or by phone.
• Meeting organizers document all comments made by participants Surveys
• SSA will develop a post-town halls survey to be sent out to participants after town halls, if the City wishes.

Pre-Town Hall Outreach
• SSA will assist the City in reaching out to community members via its marketing channels to inform the public of upcoming Town Halls.
• SSA will assist the City in reaching out to interested local community organizations, partners and affiliates.
• The City will provide a link to register for the Town Halls, as well as a link to the Transition Plan for public review.

Share the Results
• Create short reports with the data, results and input from the online surveys and virtual Town Halls input.
• Share reports with the public.
• Thank community members for their participation and ensure that their feedback will be part of the final reports.

2. Public Outreach In-person or Online Meeting
SSA will conduct a Public Outreach In-person or On-Line Meeting that fulfills the City’s directive regarding a virtual meeting format, or in-person meeting at the City’s discretion.

3. Attend One (1) City Council/City Manager Meeting (to be determined) At the request of the City, SSA will attend a City Council/City Manager Meeting (in-person or via virtual conference technology at the City’s discretion).

Task 6. ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
a. Methodology for the assessment of existing barriers to accessibility b. Executive Summary of the findings of the barrier assessment surveys c. Detailed recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier removal or remediation.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) d. Cost estimates of remediation measures and barrier removal plans e. An implementation schedule that includes milestones or measures of achievement for monitoring implementation
f. Procedures for periodically reviewing and updating the Transition Plan g. Procedures and forms for performing evaluations of additional barriers h. Procedures and forms for filing Requests for Accommodation. i. List of references and contact information for ADA and accessibility related resources j. Identification of the official(s) who will be responsible for implementation of the Transition Plan
k. Incorporate all City staff and stakeholders’ feedback and develop the Final ADA Transition Plan
Draft ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan per Title II of the ADA SSA will identify any programmatic solutions to remove an existing barrier by providing equivalent facilitation in lieu of making physical alterations.

SSA will work with City staff to prioritize removal of architectural barriers at each building, park and parking lot. SSA will consider past and current City planning activities to incorporate the activities into the Transition Plan.

SSA will develop the Draft Self-Evaluation including questionnaire responses, grievance procedure and work plan.

SSA will develop the Draft Transition Plan including priorities, schedule, funding, standard drawings and implementation.

SSA will present the Draft ADA Transition Plan and record feedback from the City team.

SSA will plan and facilitate review meetings in person or via virtual conference technology (at the City’s discretion) with the City staff as required to assure their familiarity with the draft ADA Transition Plan developed under the plan and address any questions or comments in a timely manner Final ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan per Title II of the ADA SSA will incorporate all changes and develop the final ADA Transition Plan including Executive Summary.

Task 7. Project Database and Mapping Setup
a. Final Excel Database for the ADA Transition Plan
b. Final Excel and GIS Database (Project Map) for all PROW barriers (i.e. sidewalks, curb ramps, ped signals, and bus stops) surveyed
Project Database
At the City’s discretion, once review of the field data is complete, SSA’s technical staff will handle the important task of data entry:

1. Draft Monitoring Survey Database in Excel or City Approved Software

2. Final Monitoring Survey Database in Excel or City Approved Software SSA has developed excellent computer-based tools, which provide a variety of accessibility functions.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SSA’s BlueDAG (Facilities) FileMaker (PROW) databases are relational database programs that assemble, organize and maintain field survey data; maintain records of as-built conditions (actual measurements), code requirements (required measurements), conceptual cost estimates, and recommendations for solutions for the removal of non-compliant access barriers. The programs will also generate the access compliance survey report. The BlueDAG (Facilities) FileMaker (PROW) databases will list the identified barriers in a report format that cites all deviations from applicable accessibility requirements contained in the 1991 (revised in 1994) Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines and 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Standards and the International Building Code. The format will allow sorting of recorded information by location, type, severity, category, cost of identified barriers, etc.

Mapping
GIS will play a pivotal role in this project from data acquisition (organizing the data points generated during the survey) to creating a mapping interface for asset management, compliance monitoring and prioritizing improvements.

1. Draft City-Wide PROW GIS Reference Map

2. Final City-Wide PROW GIS Reference Map
The GIS process will result in a mapping interface that documents non-standard data points (code compliance deviations) related to City-wide Public Rights-of-Way: sidewalks and curb ramps, as well as locations of pedestrian signals, and exterior pedestrian elements serving the facilities, public buildings and parks. The resulting post-processed data will be posted to the project GIS geodatabase and made available for data analysis and prioritization. SSA will customize the data elements and analysis reports to facilitate the integration of the data into the City’s ArcGIS. The inventory database and GIS mapping will be submitted as a draft for City review and comment, and comments will be incorporated into the final version. The GIS maps will be completed in Excel in 11” x 17” format compiled in a binder.

Task 8. City Staff Training
a. Applicable government code, statutes and regulations; b. Performing field investigations and inspections;
c. Preparation of ADA Compliance Assessment Reports;
d. Using and maintaining the database
e. Using and maintaining the project map
f. Monitoring and updating the ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan SSA will conduct Training with designated City Staff on maintaining and updating the ADA Transition Plan Update (at the City’s discretion, this may be conducted via virtual conference technology).

This will be an educational experience for City staff.
a. On-line Training on Applicable Government Code, Statutes, Laws, and Regulations, Inspection, Report, Database, Mapping, and Monitoring Training will be conducted to include, but not limited to:
• Review Federal and/or State accessibility Government codes, statutes and regulations; • Preparation of ADA Compliance Assessment Reports;
• Using and maintaining the completed Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan • Using and maintaining the database;
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) • Using and maintaining the project map;
• Monitoring and updating the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.

SSA will provide the materials required to conduct the City Staff Training.

Final note on SSA’s Proposed Approach
The strength of any prospective approach is in the structure it provides. SSA’s process has proven to be immensely successful, but “one size may not fit all”. By this we mean we will tailor the specifics to serve the needs and resources of the City of Pacifica and its stakeholders, whether that means adapting the schedule to allow for unforeseen local circumstances, incorporating technical consulting, or fine-tuning ways to communicate the process with all concerned.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 1. Project Management 284 days Mon 3/2/26 Thu 4/1/27 2 a. Develop and maintain project schedule and budget 284 days Mon 3/2/26 Thu 4/1/27 3 b. Project management tasks to include attending meetings, developing agendas, note-taking
284 days Mon 3/2/26 Thu 4/1/27
4 c. Assist the City in project data management, documentation, and record keeping
284 days Mon 3/2/26 Thu 4/1/27
5 d. Provide periodic progress reports and presentations for staff, stake holders, and/or City Council
284 days Mon 3/2/26 Thu 4/1/27
6 e. Facilitate Kick-Off, Interim Progress & Final Completion Online Meetings
284 days Mon 3/2/26 Thu 4/1/27
7 2. Conduct Self-Evaluation for City Policies, Programs, Services and Practices
147 days Mon 3/9/26 Tue 9/29/26
8 a. Thorough Review of City's existing Policies, Plans, Reports, and Programs.
6 days Mon 3/9/26 Mon 3/16/26
9 b. Identify Programs and Services and Associated Policies and Procedures
11 days Mon 3/16/26 Mon 3/30/26
10 c. Selecting Key Personnel Including Orientation Meeting 6 days Mon 3/30/26 Mon 4/6/26 11 d. Staff Surveys Including Questionnaires 45 days Tue 4/7/26 Mon 6/8/26 12 e. Draft Programmatic Self-Evaluation Survey Report 21 days Mon 6/29/26 Mon 7/27/26 13 f. Final Programmatic Self-Evaluation Survey Report 45 days Tue 7/28/26 Mon 9/28/26 14 3. Conduct Comprehensive City Facilities, Parks and Parking Lots Surveys and Barrier Assessments
121 days Mon 3/9/26 Mon 8/24/26
15 a. Inventory Review 6 days Mon 3/9/26 Mon 3/16/26 16 b. Plans/Diagrams with ADA barriers marked and labeled 116 days Mon 3/16/26 Mon 8/24/26 17 c. Physical Surveys of City Facilities, Parks and Parking Lots (per the list provided in Appendices C, D, and E)
c, C, and D)
66 days Mon 3/16/26 Mon 6/15/26
18 d. Draft Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports
26 days Mon 6/15/26 Mon 7/20/26
19 e. Final Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports
26 days Mon 7/20/26 Mon 8/24/26
20 4. Conduct Comprehensive City Public Right-of-Way (PROW) Survey and Barrier Assessments
191 days Mon 3/9/26 Mon 11/30/26
21 a. Inventory Review (128 linear miles of sidewalk, approximately 420 curb ramps, 3 pedestrian signals, and 10 bus stops in the City) 6 days Mon 3/9/26 Mon 3/16/26
22 b. Physical Surveys of City PROW (per the Appendix B and the Q&A issued by the City)
139 days Tue 3/17/26 Fri 9/25/26
23 c. Draft Public Right-of-Way Access Compliance Assessment Reports 22 days Fri 9/25/26 Mon 10/26/26 24 d. Final Public Right-of-Way Access Compliance Assessment Reports 26 days Mon 10/26/... Mon 11/30/26 25 5. Community Engagement 261 days? Mon 4/6/26 Mon 4/5/27 26 a. Develop proposal and implementation timeline to engage the community in the ADA Transition Plan process
11 days Mon 4/6/26 Mon 4/20/26
27 b. Specify the proposed number of meetings/workshops necessary to achieve a suitable engagement plan to meet the plan’s goals 11 days Mon 4/6/26 Mon 4/20/26
28 c. Incorporate opportunities for public comment into phases of the planning process. Review and incorporate public comment and feedback into the Plan
186 days Mon 4/20/26 Mon 1/4/27
29 d. Specify other engagement tools and media that be utilized to implement community engagement
90 days? Mon 4/6/26 Fri 8/7/26
30 e. Develop public engagement materials including surveys, informational materials, and presentations
107 days Fri 8/7/26 Mon 1/4/27
31 6. ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan 86 days? Mon 11/2/26 Mon 3/1/27 32 a. Methodology for the assessment of existing barriers to accessibility 86 days Mon 11/2/26 Mon 3/1/27 33 b. Executive Summary of the findings of the barrier assessment surveys
86 days Mon 11/2/26 Mon 3/1/27
34 c. Detailed recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier removal or remediation.
86 days Mon 11/2/26 Mon 3/1/27
35 d. Cost estimates of remediation measures and barrier removal plans 86 days Mon 11/2/26 Mon 3/1/27

M A M J J A S O N D J F M A
Half 1, 2026 Half 2, 2026 Half 1, 2027
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Progress
Deadline
City of Pacifica ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Project Timeline Date: Tue 1/27/26 S a l l y S w a n s o n A r c h i t e c t s Page 1 of 2 Project: City of PAcifica ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan by SSA, Inc.

Project Timeline

7.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
SSA Responsibilities & Tasks City of Pacifica ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Fee Proposal by SSA, Inc.

Tasks Total
PIC / Project
Manager CASp QA/QC Policy
Specialist
Facility
Specialist
GIS/
Database
Specialist
Technical
Staff Operations
Sally
Swanson
Scott
Saddlemire,
CASp
Troy
Balthazor,
AIA
Don Salts,
CASp
Deniz Turan,
PhD Various Various Car
(Week)
Lodging
(month)
Meals &
Incidental
(Day)
$175.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $150.00 $90.00 $100.00 $400.00 $2,940.00 $79.00 1 Project Management
a. Develop and maintain project schedule and budget 2 2 2 2 8 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 b. Project management tasks to include attending meetings, developing agendas, note-taking 2 2 2 2 8 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 c. Assist the City in project data management, documentation, and record keeping 2 2 2 2 8 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 d. Provide periodic progress reports and presentations for staff, stake holders, and/or City Council 2 2 2 2 8 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 e. Facilitate Kick-Off, Interim Progress & Final Completion Online Meetings 10 10 10 10 40 $6,250.00 $6,250.00 Subtotal: 18 0 18 18 18 0 0 72 $11,250.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 11,250.00 2 Conduct Self-Evaluation for City Policies, Programs, Services and Practices a. Thorough Review of City's existing Policies, Plans, Reports, and Programs. 2 10 12 $1,850.00 $1,850.00 b. Identify Programs and Services and Associated Policies and Procedures 2 8 10 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 c. Selecting Key Personnel Including Orientation Meeting 2 12 14 $2,150.00 $2,150.00 d. Staff Surveys Including Questionnaires 2 30 32 $4,850.00 $4,850.00 e. Draft Programmatic Self-Evaluation Survey Report 2 22 24 $3,650.00 $3,650.00 f. Final Programmatic Self-Evaluation Survey Report 2 10 12 $1,850.00 $1,850.00 Subtotal: 12 0 92 0 0 0 0 104 $ 15,900.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 15,900.00 3 Conduct Comprehensive City Facilities, Parks and Parking Lots Surveys and Barrier Assessments a. Inventory Review 2 2 8 12 $1,850.00 $1,850.00
b. Plans/Diagrams with ADA barriers marked and labeled 24 24 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 c. Physical Surveys of City Facilities, Parks and Parking Lots (per the list provided in Appendices C, D, and E) 180 180 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 d. Draft Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports 8 40 20 68 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 e. Final Buildings, Parks and Parking Lots Access Compliance Assessment Reports 2 8 20 12 10 52 $7,250.00 $7,250.00 Subtotal: 4 18 0 272 12 30 0 336 $ 48,700.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 48,700.00 4 Conduct Comprehensive City Public Right-of-Way (PROW) Survey and Barrier Assessments a. Inventory Review (128 linear miles of sidewalk, approximately 420 curb ramps, 3 pedestrian signals, and 10 bus stops in the City) 6 6 12 $1,440.00 $1,440.00
b. Physical Surveys of City PROW (per the Appendix B and the Q&A issued by the City) 180 70 250 $23,200.00 $23,200.00 c. Draft Public Right-of-Way Access Compliance Assessment Reports 40 20 60 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 d. Final Public Right-of-Way Access Compliance Assessment Reports 20 10 30 $3,900.00 $3,900.00 Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 66 216 70 352 $ 36,340.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 36,340.00 5 Community Engagement
a. Develop proposal and implementation timeline to engage the community in the ADA Transition Plan process 6 6 12 $1,950.00 $1,950.00 b. Specify the proposed number of meetings/workshops necessary to achieve a suitable engagement plan to meet the plan’s goals 4 6 10 $1,600.00 $1,600.00
c. Incorporate opportunities for public comment into phases of the planning process. Review and incorporate public comment and feedback into the Plan 4 4 4 12 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 d. Specify other engagement tools and media that be utilized to implement community engagement 4 4 4 4 16 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 e. Develop public engagement materials including surveys, informational materials, and presentations 4 6 2 6 18 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 Subtotal: 22 0 26 6 14 0 0 68 $ 10,750.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,750.00 6 ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
a. Methodology for the assessment of existing barriers to accessibility 2 2 2 2 2 10 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 b. Executive Summary of the findings of the barrier assessment surveys 2 6 8 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 c. Detailed recommendations of remedial measures to correct deficiencies and a methodology for the prioritization of barrier removal or remediation. 2 2 2 2 2 10 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 d. Cost estimates of remediation measures and barrier removal plans 2 2 2 2 2 10 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 e. An implementation schedule that includes milestones or measures of achievement for monitoring implementation 2 2 2 2 2 10 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 f. Procedures for periodically reviewing and updating the Transition Plan 2 2 2 2 2 10 $1,550.00 $1,550.00 g. Procedures and forms for performing evaluations of additional barriers 2 2 $300.00 $300.00 h. Procedures and forms for filing Requests for Accommodation. 2 2 $300.00 $300.00 i. List of references and contact information for ADA and accessibility related resources 2 2 4 $650.00 $650.00 j. Identification of the official(s) who will be responsible for implementation of the Transition Plan 2 4 6 $900.00 $900.00 k. Incorporate all City staff and stakeholders' feedback and develop the Final ADA Transition Plan 2 2 4 6 14 $2,150.00 $2,150.00 Subtotal: 14 10 20 20 22 0 0 86 $ 13,250.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 13,250.00 7 Project Database and Mapping Setup
a. Final Excel Database for the ADA Transition Plan 24 10 34 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 b. Final Excel and GIS Database (Project Map) for all PROW barriers (i.e. sidewalks, curb ramps, ped signals, and bus stops) surveyed 12 10 22 $2,700.00 $2,700.00
Subtotal: 0 0 0 0 36 20 0 56 $ 7,200.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,200.00 8 City Staff Training
a. Applicable government code, statutes and regulations; 4 4 4 12 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 b. Performing field investigations and inspections; 4 4 $600.00 $600.00 c. Preparation of ADA Compliance Assessment Reports; 2 2 4 $600.00 $600.00 d. Using and maintaining the database 2 2 4 $600.00 $600.00 e. Using and maintaining the project map 2 2 $300.00 $300.00 f. Monitoring and updating the ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan 2 2 2 6 $950.00 $950.00 Subtotal: 6 0 4 14 8 0 0 32 $ 4,950.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,950.00 Grand Total: 76 28 160 330 176 266 70 1106 $ 148,340.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 148,340.00 Notes: 1. If there is a significant increase to the scope of work outlined above, SSA reserves the right to renegotiate the services fee with the City.

2. Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) guarantees that no additional fees will be charged prior written consent by the City.

3. All expenses are included, including reimbursable, if applicable.

4. All reports will be submitted in PDF format.

Task # Total Hours Total Labor
Costs
Sally Swanson Architects, Inc.

Total Fee
ODC's
Other Direct Costs
Task Description
1/2
Tasks handled by the city of Pacifica
• Making available relevant reports, programs, services, procedures • Select staff as part of the Self-Evaluation process
• Select staff for training as required by the RFP
• Review and comment on draft report

7.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
Innovative Solution for Data Collection
Digital Profiling of Sidewalk Inventory & GIS Integration SSA utilizes a walking sidewalk profiler developed by Surface, Systems and Instruments, Inc. (SSI), specifically to measure compliance with ADA criteria. The profiler offers a superior alternative to the traditional method of manual survey collection with a cost-effective proprietary technology in gathering field data within the public rights-of-way.

Comparing manual sidewalk collection (dots) vs profiler sidewalk collection (lines) At SSA, we ensure the survey data are accurate and precise. The profiler survey data in the below diagram (lines) collected by four different surveyors confirms the consistency of data and the repeated performance of identifying cross slopes greater than 2.0%. However, the manual data collection (dots) lacks the same consistency and fails to capture some areas where the cross slope is greater than 2.0%.

For these reasons, SSA uses the profiler for all sidewalk data collection to ensure our clients are given the most accurate and meaningful data.

Using Surface Profilers with a Geographical Information System (GIS) is a cost-effective solution to record and map ADA barriers within pedestrian infrastructures.

7.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
Prioritize Barriers
Barriers are prioritized based on their proximity to several criteria, such as popular attractors, schools, hospitals, transit stops, population, and main traffic routes. Layers of information are compiled and integrated into GIS. Barriers with heavy pedestrian activity are assigned a higher activity score, which determines their priority for upgrades and help the clients prepare ahead of time. Knowing the prioritization scores allows fitting the scope of work to existing budgets.

Generate Reports
The sidewalk inventory data is stored in a database which then is translated into a detailed report in an organized format that can be adjusted according to the client’s needs.

Benefits
A detailed inventory of pedestrian infrastructure meets the basic requirement of the law and serve as a tracking tool for future planning and construction needs.

7.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.2.B Company Information
Firm Name: Sally Swanson Architects, Inc.

Years in Business: 46 years
Address: 582 Market Street, Suite 1007
San Francisco, CA 94104
T 415-445-3045
M 415-308-6555 (Sally Swanson’s Cell)
Firm Website: www.swanarch.com
Main Contact: Sally Swanson, AIA, as CEO and Founding Principal Type of Organization: Private Company, California Corporation Incorporated Nov. 19, 2001 Name of Owner: Founder/Principal-in Charge Sally Swanson, AIA CA Architect License: #C12746
San Francisco Business Registration Certificate: #379994 Burbank Business Tax Registration Certificate: BT - 1014190 Los Angeles Tax Registration Certificate: #0002958322-0001-8 Firm Certifications:
• CA Department of General Services: Small Business Enterprise - SB(Micro) • San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA): Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Federal Tax I.D.: 01-0600856
CA Secretary of State Entity Number: #2275182
Scope of Services: Founded in 1980, Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. has two practice specialties:

1. ADA Access Compliance

2. Educational and Civic Architectural Design
Firm History and Organization: For over 46 years, Sally Swanson Architects has been a pioneering firm dedicated to creating accessible environments by pairing deep expertise in ADA compliance with strong, place-making design. The firm collaborates closely with clients to navigate California ADA code requirements while mitigating barriers across a broad range of project types, and has never failed or refused to complete a contract. SSA’s expertise includes preparing ADA Guidance Documents for the Division of the State Architect now used statewide, employing surface-profiling technology that collects sidewalk data six times faster than traditional methods, and developing Universal Design and Accessibility Guidelines for multiple Olympic and Paralympic Games, including Sochi 2014, PyeongChang 2018, and Tokyo 2020.

Statement of Auditor Independence: Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) attests that “it is independent of the City as required by generally accepted auditing standards and specifically defined by the U.S.

General Accounting Office’s Government Auditing Standards (1994)” Litigation, Claims, and Disciplinary History: Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) attests that the firm has no “litigation, mediation, or arbitration, regarding the performance of any services similar to the Services, in which the Company (SSA) has been involved in the past five (5) years”. As the Services require a license or certification (which it does regarding Certified Access Specialists), the Proposal submitted by SSA indicates the following: SSA has had no “claims or disciplinary action taken against Company (SSA) or any of Company’s (SSA) key personnel within the past five years”.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

7.2.C Company Personnel
Principal In Charge/
Project Manager
Sally Swanson, AIA
GIS and Database
Specialist ADA Policy Specialist
ADA Facilities Specialist
Dr. Deniz Turan, Ph.D.

Don Salts, CASp
City of Pacifica
Key Project Team
Quality Assurance
+ Quality Control Specialist
Scott Saddlemire, CASp
Principal In Charge/
Project Manager
Sally Swanson, AIA
GIS and Database
Specialist
ADA Facilities Specialist
Dr. Deniz Turan, Ph.D.

Don Salts, CASp
Quality Assurance
+ Quality Control Specialist
Scott Saddlemire, CASp
Troy Balthazor &
Jana Burke Ph. D., ADAC
Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. attests that “key personnel will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of the project” and acknowledges “that no person designated as “key” to the project will be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the city”.

Access Surveyor
Ezra Banks & Gopal Bhusal

7.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Principal-In-Charge/Project Manager
License:

Architect, CA, 1982,
#C12746
Education:

Columbia University
M.A. in Urban Design &
Planning
University of Illinois
B.A. in Architecture
University of Washington
Environmental Studies
Cities: Los Angeles, Santa
Barbara, Rancho Cordova,
Chowchilla, Bellflower,
Vernon, Yorba Linda,
Montebello, Rialto,
Mariposa, Madera,
Oakley, Woodland,
Richmond,Alameda, San
Francisco, Los Banos,
Porterville, Winters
Counties: San Bernardino,
Humboldt, Sacramento,
Kings, Kern, Marin,
Mendocino, Placer, San
Mateo, Santa Barbara,
Sonoma, Stanislaus, San Luis
Obispo, Brown County, WI
and St. Louis County, MO
Higher Education: Sonoma
County Junior College
District, Cerritos CCD,
University of California
Davis, San Diego CCD
ADA

EXPERIENCE

P R O F I L E
Ms. Swanson, Founding Principal and CEO, of Sally
Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) has 46 years of experience in architecture, planning and accessible design and has managed her own award– winning firm since 1980.

Ms. Swanson and the SSA team have delivered countless
facility modernizations, new construction projects, as well as ADA Transition Plans, and Self-Evaluations, for public & private sector clients, including schools, community
colleges, universities, correctional facilities, cities,

SWANSON,AIA
SALLY

BACKGROUND
San Mateo County Harbor District - 2016-2017
ADA Transition Plan
Santa Clara Valley Open Space District - 2022-2023
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Porterville , CA - 2023-2024
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Winters, CA - 2023-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of San Pablo, CA - 2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Santa Barbara, CA - 2023-2024
ADA Accessibility Reviews
City of Los Banos, CA - 2024-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Madera, CA - 2021
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan

NOTABLE WORK EXPERIENCE
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

7.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

P R O F I L E
Mr. Salts brings an extensive background in Code
Enforcement, Interpretation, and Construction Inspection.

As a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) Inspector he has performed Accessibility Assessments for dozens of clients throughout California. in accordance with ADA, California Building Code and Certified Accessibility Specialist
Compliance Audit (CRASCA) Standards. Mr. Salts has a
broad array of project management skills, is detail-oriented and a fast learner who understands the importance of
keeping schedule and budget on track.

ADA Facilities Specialist
SALTS, CASp
DON
License:

Certified Access Specialist
(CASp) – Issued by DSA #669
Building Inspector – ICC
Electrical Inspector – ICC
Plans Examiner – ICC
Mechanical Inspector – ICC
Plumbing Inspector – ICC
Combination Inspector – ICC
Education:

Butte College, Oroville, CA
Building Inspection
Technology
Diablo Valley College
Associate’s Degree, Building
Inspection Technology
State of California, Berkeley
Resident Engineers Academy
Counties: Sacramento, Contra
Costa, Marin, California
Cities: Winters, Martinez, Los
Banos, Los Angeles, California
Types of Facilities Surveyed:

Pools, Parks, Playgrounds,
Nature Trails, Golf Corses,
Theaters, Schools,
Evacuation Shelters,
Retail, Office Buildings,
Historic Buildings, Stadiums,
Restaurants.

ADA

EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
City of Winters,CA – 2023-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of San Pablo, CA - 2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Los Banos, CA - 2024-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety – 2020-2024 ADA Compliance Settlement Agreement
Borough-Based Jails (New York City, New York) –
2020-Present
ADA Plan Review
City of Los Angeles, CA - 2020-Present
ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan
Sacramento County Department of Airports - 2023-2028
ADA Self-Assessment and Transition Plan

NOTABLE WORK EXPERIENCE
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

7.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SADDLEMIRE,CASp
SCOTT

P R O F I L E
ADA

EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
License:

Certified Access
Specialist (CASp #677)
Division State Architect
Project Inspector Cert
#5893
Education:

Four-year apprenticeship
through IBEW/NECA
Cities: Santa Barbara,
Madera, Yorba Linda,
Montebello and Rialto,
CA
Counties: Sonoma, CA,
San Bernardino, CA
Higher Education:Solano
Community College
District
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Specialist
Mr. Saddlemire is a Certified Access Specialist (CASp) with Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA).

Mr. Saddlemire’s responsibilities include comprehensive Quality Assurance and Quality Control management of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) projects
where his role includes developing and producing detailed reports. He serves as a very hands-on Quality Assurance and Quality Control Specialist.

City of Porterville,CA – 2023-2024
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Los Banos, CA - 2024-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
County of San Bernardino,CA – 2013-Present
ADA Accessibility Compliance Services
City of Santa Barbara,CA – 2023
ADA Accessibility Reviews

NOTABLE WORK EXPERIENCE
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

7.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) G I S & D a t a b a s e S p e c i a l i s t
TURAN, Ph.D.

DR. DENIZ

P R O F I L E
Dr. Turan has been utilizing GIS services since her
undergraduate years. On every project Ms. Turan was
assigned on her path to achieving a Ph.D. in Hydrology
as well as her work beyond university, Ms. Turan found it increasingly helpful to present her findings on a GIS-based map with an embedded interactive database including
every detailed element of information belonging to that project. License:

Geographic Information
Systems Specialization
Coursera 2019
Education:

Ph.D., Hydrology from
Rutgers University
M.Sc., Hydrogeology
from Middle East
Technical University
B.S., Geological
Engineering from Middle
East Technical University
Counties: Sacramento
County Department
of Airports ADA SelfAssesssment and Transition
Plan, County of Merced
ADA Transition Plan, County
of Sonoma ADA Transition
Plan, County of Mariposa
ADA Transition Plan
Cities: City of Porterville,
City of Winters, City of Los
Banos City of Montebello
ADA Transition Plan, City
of Madera ADA Transition
Plan, City of Rialto Transition
Plan
ADA

EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority - 2022-2023
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Winters, CA - 2023-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Porterville – 2023-2024
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of San Pablo, CA - 2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Los Banos, CA - 2024-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Montebello, CA - 2021-2024
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of Rialto, CA - 2022-2024
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
County of Sonoma - 2023-2024
ADA Act Title II, Self-Evaluation Transition Plan Phase II For Rural Unincorporated Areas

NOTABLE WORK EXPERIENCE
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

7.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Services for Independent
Living -1998-2005
ADA and Fair Housing
Specialist
Great Plains ADA
Center -2005-2017
ADA Specialist
Great Plains ADA
Center -2022-2025
Director and Principal
Investigator
Cities: Garner,Kansas
;Kirksville, Missouri
Education:

University of Missouri
B.A English - 1993
Masters in Special
Education -2011
Professional Memberships:

Board of Directors –
PedNet Coalition (Now
LocalMotion) President 2015
Columbia Disabilities
Commission – Member
Boone County Basic Needs
Coalition – Past President
Legal Services of Eastern
Missouri Board of Directors –
Past President

Balthazor
Troy

P R O F I L E

WORK EXPERIENCE
ADA

EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
ADA Policy Specialist
Troy Balthazor brings extraordinary professional
qualifications to his role as ADA Policy Specialist. He has provided Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Universal Design consulting services to businesses both domestic and international. Assisted government entities in creation and implementation of ADA Self-Evaluations
and Transition Plans. Troy has also collaborated and
coordinated with subject specialists to provide best in class services to their clients.

Previously, Troy was the Director and Principal Investigator at the Great Plains ADA Center where he led one of ten
Regional ADA Centers within a four-state service area. He also developed and hosted the National ADA Symposium
annually, attracting 700-1000 attendees. Tray was
responsible to collaborate and coordinate with Federal
enforcement agencies such as DOJ, HUD, etc. where he
managed a one million dollar annual budget; managed
and continually grew a 1.5 million dollar income account, and developed training, technical assistance, research
and knowledge translation services for the agency.

Within the Great Plains ADA Center, Troy also had
leadership responsibilities as an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Specialist where he provided training and
technical assistance to consumers regionally and
nationally; developed training programs and modules
for the Center; taught “inclusive Recreation” to classes of up to 175 students at the University of Missouri, and developed training core curriculum to augment the ADA
Coordinator Training Certification Program
He also consulted with business and governmental
entities on compliance with the ADA and other laws and
regulations.

NOTABLE SSA WORK EXPERIENCE
City of McMinnville, OR – 2025
ADA Transition Plan
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

7.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
Education:

Capella Unversity
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD),
Organization & Management
2007
Regis Unversity
Master of Arts (MA), Nonprofit
Management
The Colorado College
BA, English ,
Minor:Women's Studies
Professional Memberships:

ADA Coordinator Training
Certification Program (ACTCP) -
member
Association for Talent
Development - member
Society for Disability Studies
-member
Society for Human Resource
Management - member
American Public Health
Association- member
National Association of
Rehabilitation Research &
Training Centers (NARRTC) —
Former President and Board
Officer
Ph.D.,ADAC
Jana Burke

P R O F I L E

WORK EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
ADA Policy Specialist
Dr. Jana L. Burke, ADAC, is a nationally recognized ADA and disability law expert with over 20 years of experience helping public, private, and nonprofit organizations
achieve practical compliance while advancing disability inclusion. As President of Mariposa Professional Services and an ADA Consultant to the Region 7 Great Plains ADA
Center, she provides strategic planning, training, research, and technical assistance focused on employment,
government services, and accessible communications. Dr.

Burke has led federally funded ADA initiatives, authored widely used disability toolkits, served as an expert witness in complex civil rights litigation, and delivered more than 500 ADA-related trainings nationwide, making her a trusted
advisor on disability rights, organizational readiness, and inclusive practices.

Mariposa Professional Services
President
Present
Region 7 Great Plains ADA Center
ADA Consultant
2021 – Present
Meeting the Challenge, Inc. (MTC)
Director of Research & Development
2002 – 2013
Rocky Mountain ADA Center (Managed by MTC)
Project Director & Principal Investigator
2007 – 2013
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

7.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
Spatial Pattern Analysis and
Research Lab: UCSB Geography

Research Intern -
Jan. 2025- Jul. 2025
Bike Counter/MechanicOct. 2023 - Jun. 2024
UCSB Ecology, Evolution and
Marine Biology: GIS Research

Research AssistantOct. 2022 - Dec. 2022
MKThink/Roundhouseone
Technical Research Intern -
Jun. 2022-Sep. 2022

Education:

University of California, Santa
Barbara - 2021-2025
Geography (emphasis on
GIS)
Minor: Architecture and
Urban History
Banks
Ezra

P R O F I L E

WORK EXPERIENCE

EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
Access Surveyor
Mr. Banks is a recent graduate from UC Santa Barbara
with a degree in Geography and an emphasis in GIS. As
an Access Surveyor, he is responsible for collecting on site ADA compliance information such as slope, cross slope
and public right-of-way access generally. Furthermore,
he processes this data and formats it into a GIS format for clients.

Mr. Banks has experience in the fields of GIS/spatial data analysis and architecture. Recently, he worked on a
research project focused on evaluating the feasibility of using open source GIS data for informing pedestrian and cyclist infrastructure policy decisions. Before that, his work at another architectural firm included a combination of data analysis and design tasks.

He possess skills in ArcGIS, Python, SQL, Microsoft Office, and Adobe Creative Cloud. Additionally speaks Spanish.

SKILLS
Languages: English (native),
Spanish (advanced)
Systems: GIS, Microsoft
Office, Python, Tableau,
AWS, Adobe Creative Cloud,
Jira Confluence
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

City of San Pablo, CA - 2025
ADA Transition Plan - Update 2025
City of Los Banos, CA - 2024-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of McMinnville, OR - 2025
ADA Transition Plan

NOTABLE WORK EXPERIENCE

7.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
Saint Louis University

Graduate Research Assistant:

Bo’s Fluvial Geomorphology Lab
Aug. 2024 - May 2025
Graduate Research Assistant:

Geospatial Integrated Earth
Surface Research (GIESR) Lab
Group
Aug. 2023 - Jul. 2024
National Atmospheric Resource
and Environmental Research
Laboratory (NARERL)
Junior Researcher
Dec. 2019 - Jul. 2022
Education:

Saint Louis University
M.S Geographic Information
Science - May 2025
Tribhuvan University
M.S in Physics - Dec 2019
B.S in Physics - Jul 2017
Bhusal
Gopal

P R O F I L E

WORK EXPERIENCE

EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND
Access Surveyor
Mr. Bhusal is a GIS professional with a Master’s degree in Geographic Information Science from Saint Louis
University. His work focuses on geospatial data collection, field surveying, and spatial analysis to support accessibility and infrastructure mapping projects. With strong skills in ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, and GPS-based field
data acquisition, he ensures accurate and consistent
integration of survey data into GIS environments for
effective project planning and visualization.

His responsibilities at SSA include conducting field
surveys using GPS and profiler equipment to collect
accessibility data on curb ramps, pedestrian signals,
and related infrastructure. He will process and analyze field data in ArcGIS to ensure spatial accuracy, support Quality Assurance and Quality Control workflows, and
assists in creating GIS-based maps and datasets for ADA compliance and transition planning. His role emphasizes precision, field coordination, and the delivery of highquality spatial products for client and internal use.

SKILLS
GIS & Remote Sensing: ArcGIS
Pro, QGIS, ArcGIS Online, ENVI,
SNAP, Google Earth Engine,
LiDAR, SAR/InSAR
Programming & Databases:

Python, JavaScript (with Leaflet),
SQL, PostgreSQL/PostGIS
Field Equipment & Data
Collection:

RTK GPS, Survey123, Acoustic
Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP)
The proposer affirms that the firm and assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in the State of California.

City of San Pablo, CA - 2025
ADA Transition Plan - Update 2025
City of Los Banos, CA - 2024-2025
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
City of McMinnville, OR - 2025
ADA Transition Plan

NOTABLE WORK EXPERIENCE

7.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Location: 17 Johnson Pier, Half Moon Bay, CA 94019
Date of Project: 2016-2017
Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, AIA, Principal-in-Charge
Client Contact: John Moren
Director of Operations
San Mateo County Harbor District
504 Avenue Alhambra, 2nd Floor
P.O. Box 1449, El Granada, CA 94018
(650)-583-4400
[email protected]
Services/Scope:
• ADA Transition Plan
Project Description:

SSA provided ADA Transition Plan Services for the San
Mateo County Harbor District (SMCHD). Locations included the Pillar Point Harbor/Admin Office in Half Moon Bay and the Oyster Point Marina. SSA conducted an evaluation of all relevant public facilities, including research, field
data collection and data analysis.

Project Value: $160,140.00
San Mateo County Harbor District
ADA Transition Plan

7.2.E Experience and References
SSA has no past or current business and personal relationships with any current Pacifica elected official, appointed official, City employee, or family member of any current Pacifica elected official, appointed official, or City employee.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE

7.2.D Disclosure

7.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority
ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan
Location: Santa Clara Valley, CA (three preserves, 20 miles of trails Services: ADA Assessment, Prioritization, Access Compliance Type of Project: ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Project Value: $80,122
Date of Project: 2022-2023
Key SSA Staff: Sally Swanson, AIA, Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager
Chris Sircello, CASp Facilities Specialist
Deniz Turan, PHD, GIS/Database Specialist

Primary Contact: Jennifer Peth
Associate Open Space Planner
Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority
408.224.7476;
[email protected]
Description:

Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority’s facilities, programs, activities, services, and communications for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and State of California access codes.

The Authority is an independent special district created on February 1, 1993, by an act of the Legislature and is governed by a seven-member elected board of directors. The Authority has preserved over 28,000 acres, that includes three preserves with over 20 miles of trail.

Among the objectives for the ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan were that it provides the following:
• Identify physical obstacles in the public entity’s facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities.
• Describe in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible.
• Project cost estimates for each of the recommendations shall be included in the Transition Plan to assist with capital improvement plans to bring facilities into compliance.

The Self-Evaluation identifies any programmatic and physical barriers limiting the accessibility of the Authority’s programs, activities, services, or facilities.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) City of Winters
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
Location: Winters, California
Type of Project: ADA Accessibility Compliance
Date of Project: December 2023 – January 2025
Key SSA Staff:

Sally Swanson, Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager
Don Salts, CASp, ADA Facilities Specialist
Dr. Deniz Turan, PhD., GIS and Database Specialist
Client Contact:

Eric Lucero, Director of Operations & Maintenance
City of Winters Public Works Department
318 First Street
City of Winters, CA 95694
Phone: (530)-795-4910 #115
Email: [email protected]
Project Description:

The City of Winters selected Sally Swanson Architects,
Inc. (SSA) to update the City’s 2018 Transition Plan Update. A new and comprehensive Transition Plan update was prompted as the City had acquired new property,
built and opened new facilities and needed to ensure that City facilities are accessible to the public.

SSA evaluated the City’s current ADA Transition Plan,
conducting inspections of City buildings, parks, public street rights-of-way (curb cuts), identifying improvements required throughout the City in order to comply with ADA standards and completed a comprehensive update to the
existing Transition Plan. A public meeting was scheduled to assess the public’s concerns and community outreach
will be conducted to resources and organizations serving persons with disabilities. SSA Certified Access Specialists are included as part of the dedicated and specialized inhouse project team.

Project Value: $87,445
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) Location: Porterville, CA
Date of Project: November 2023 - December 2024
Key SSA Staff:

Sally Swanson,Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager,
Scott Saddlemire, CASp, ADA Facilities Specialist,
Deniz Turan, Ph.D. GIS/Database Specialist,
Client Contact: Javier Sanchez
Engineering and Program Management
Director, City of Porterville
291 N. Main Street, Porterville, CA 93257
(559)-782-7462,
[email protected]
Services/Scope:
• ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
• ADA Surveys:
• Facilities
• Parks
• Parking Lots
• Streets
• Intersections
• Sidewalks
• Self-Evaluation:
• Policies
• Programs
• Services
• Public Outreach
• Database/GIS
• Staff Training
• Transition Plan
Project Description:

Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) was engaged by the City of Porterville to compile and implement a comprehensive Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan for City programs, policies, facilities, parks, parking lots, streets, intersections and sidewalks. The scope of work also includes Public Outreach, Database, GIS, and Staff Training.

Project Value: $196,500
Size: City-wide
City of Porterville
ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan
SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) City of San Pablo
ADA Transition Plan - 2025 Update
Location: San Pablo, California
Date of Project: May 2025-Present
Key SSA Staff:

Sally Swanson, AIA, Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager Scott Saddlemire, CASp: QA + QC
Don Salts, CASp: Facilities Specialist
Dr. Deniz Turan, Ph.D.: GIS/Database Specialist
Ezra Banks, Access Surveyor
Gopal Bhusal, Access Surveyor

Client Contact:Matthew Brown, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer City of San Pablo, City Clerk’s Office
1000 Gateway Avenue
San Pablo, CA 94806
Phone: 510-215-3061
Email: [email protected]
Services/Scope: Facilities Survey, PROW Survey, Transition Plan Update
Project Value: $165,525
Project Description:

The City of San Pablo awarded Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) the ADA Transition Plan – 2025 Update (Project No. 0001). San Pablo is located in West Contra Costa County, with a population of about 32,000 in an area of approximately two and one-half square miles, it is historically one of the oldest Spanish settlements in the region.

SSA was contracted by the City of San Pablo to complete the following tasks:
a. Project Management
b. Perform site inspections and measurements with
documentation.
c. Prepare a written report identifying deficiencies.
d. Prepare maps/drawings/diagrams of facilities
inspected.
e. Prepare spreadsheets summarizing each facility
inspected and findings.
f. Prepare cost estimates for recommended
improvements.

The project Scope of Work requires the preparation of a report evaluating compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for the exterior of all City-owned facilities including buildings, parks, and roadways. Within the City Boundary, the project excludes State right-of-way related to Interstate Highway

80. The project is currently on track to meet its contracted budget.

SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE 7.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan) SECTION 7. VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE
City of Pacifica ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Fee Proposal by SSA, Inc.

2. Sally Swanson Architects, Inc. (SSA) guarantees that no additional fees will be charged prior written consent by the City.

3. All expenses are included, including reimbursable, if applicable.

4. All reports will be submitted in PDF format.

Task # Total Hours Total Labor
Costs
Sally Swanson Architects, Inc.

Total Fee
ODC's
Other Direct Costs
Task Description
1/28

7.3 Price Proposal

7.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

7.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment 1: Sally Swanson Architects - Signed Contract (6158 : ADA Transition Plan)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:
2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Move to adopt a Resolution accepting the City’s 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan and the 2025 Annual Progress Report on Implementation of Other Elements of the General Plan, and directing the City Manager to transmit the reports to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI).

STAFF CONTACT:

Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director
(650) 446-4968
[email protected]
Elizabeth Brooks, MPA, Management Analyst II
(650) 738-7341
[email protected]
Sabina Mora, Contract Planner, Good City Company
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

California Government Code Section 65400 (“Section 65400”) requires Planning staff to provide to the City Council an Annual Progress Report (APR) on the status and progress of implementation of the General Plan and the Housing Element of General Plan and for the City to submit the reports to the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), formerly known as the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”), by April 1 of each year.

1. Housing Element Annual Progress Report (APR)
The City of Pacifica's 2023-2031 Housing Element was formally adopted by the City Council on March 24, 2025, with certification by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) effective as of September 19, 2025. The 2025 APR describes planning activities that were in process during the 2025 calendar year and will contribute to meeting requirements during the 6th Housing Element Cycle (2023 - 2031).

Providing a copy of the APR to HCD fulfills a statutory requirement to report certain housing information to the State. This document does not create or alter policy; it is a reporting 8 Packet Pg. 154
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026
document. The following discussion and the attached 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report (Exhibit A to the proposed resolution) comply with State law requirements.

The 2025 Calendar Year APR, prepared by staff using specific forms required by HCD1, provides HCD with an update on the jurisdiction’s progress toward meeting its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and Housing Element program objectives (Exhibit A). Established by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), City’s RHNA 6 allocation for the planning period 2023-2031 is 1,892 housing units. This is an increase of 1,479 units or a 358 percent increase, compared to the RHNA 5 allocation. The projection period is the timeframe for which the RHNA is calculated and progress is measured. The sixth cycle (2023–2031) projection period began on June 30, 2023, and ends on December 31, 2031. The 2025 APR is the third APR in the sixth cycle projection period and measures housing production during the 2025 calendar year.

The 2025 APR provides data on the number of housing units for which the City granted planning entitlements (i.e., discretionary approvals), building permits, and certificates of occupancy during the 2025 calendar year. It also includes data on housing unit production across affordability levels, a listing of development applications received, and provides an update on housing program implementation.

The Housing Element APR requirements are established by legislation and continue to expand.

In addition to historic requirements to track overall housing unit production and affordability, local jurisdictions are now obligated to include detailed information such as project addresses, permit numbers, dates of completed application submittals, entitlements issued, building permits issued, and building permits finalized between January 1 and December 31 of a given year.

Affordability levels, housing tenure (ownership and rentals), and streamlining applications are also recorded.

The APR must be provided to the Council at a public meeting where members of the public have an opportunity to provide comments. Members of the public may comment on the APR during public comment as part of consideration of the item.

Staff reports the following observations as compared to the 2024 APR in terms of housing unit production:
• In 2025, housing unit production, measured by building permits, remained stable at 20 units, (20 units were also approved in 2024). Similarly, 31 Certificates of Occupancy (C/Os) were issued, slightly below the previous year's 43. • In 2025, 7 of the 31 C/Os issued were for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), representing 23 percent of C/Os. In 2025, 24 C/Os (were issued as a part of the 801 Fassler Drive multiplex (not ADUs). ADUs comprised 93 percent of the C/Os that were issued in 2024: 40 of the 43 C/Os issued.
• The City received applications for 23 ADUs in 2025 (27 in 2024). Of these, all were approved ministerially. The City issued 18 building permits and 7 C/Os for ADUs in 1 Staff acknowledges that the Housing Element APR format can be difficult to navigate; however, the City is mandated by HCD to use this specific reporting template. 8 Packet Pg. 155
Pacifica City Council 3
March 09, 2026
2025.
• The City continues to process applications under the state law known as Senate Bill 9, or SB 9. SB 9 allows for ministerial approval (i.e., no discretionary review) of two residential unit projects and/or urban lot splits of existing lots for projects that meet the qualifying criteria in the law. Six SB 9 applications have been submitted, four of which were approved in 2025 (two are pending).
• Twenty-two housing units were entitled in 2025 through the processing of residential development applications (compared to 2 in 2024). The City of Pacifica does not have a discretionary entitlement process for ADUs which are processed ministerially. In 2025, 6 ADUs were approved ministerially.
• In 2025, the City received complete applications for 40 housing units, a substantial decrease from 397 in 2024 but consistent with 64 in 2023. In 2024, the city received applications for an unusually large number of units due to two applications: Pacifica Gateway on Coast Highway, south of Reina del Mar Avenue (APNs 018-140-690, & 018- 140-700) for 225 units, and Sea Cove at 4625 Coast Highway for 117 units. No APRqualifying entitlements or permits were issued for these two projects in 2025.

The APR also highlights other accomplishments and milestones achieved throughout the 2025 reporting period.
2025 Housing Element Program Implementation:
• Housing Element was certified by HCD
• Completed zoning and associated General Plan amendments (and environmental review) for RHNA sites to implement HE Program HE-I-1
• Initiated Zoning Modernization and Objective Design Standards Outreach and Analysis program (HE-I-2) and Public Sites Planning initiative (HE-I-3) • Advanced ADU development (HE-I-4) via shared services (San Mateo County ADU Resource Center, Online Plans Gallery, ADU OneStop)
• Initiated inclusionary housing and density bonus ordinance updates • Supported and extended the Temporary Safe Parking Program • Planning for Sewer Replacement and Rehabilitation (R&R) projects in the Vallemar and Rockaway Beach
• Completed the Sharp Park ADA Pedestrian Improvement Project and Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project
• Participated in the HEART of San Mateo County shared housing capacity program

2. Other General Plan Elements
The General Plan APR updates the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI) on each jurisdiction’s progress implementing their General Plan. Staff have also conducted a review of the City’s General Plan and prepared a report outlining notable items related to implementation on elements other than the Housing Element (Exhibit B to the proposed resolution). This is the fourth annual report on the 2040 General Plan which was adopted by the City Council in July 2022 to comprehensively update the General Plan (except the Housing Element).

A few highlights from the report are provided below:
8 Packet Pg. 156
Pacifica City Council 4
March 09, 2026
Economic Sustainability Element (ES)
ES-I-2: City-Owned Catalyst Projects. Use City-owned properties as catalysts for new development in the Palmetto area and elsewhere in the City.

The City initiated and completed the Surplus Land Act process for 2212 Beach Boulevard, a key city-owned site identified in the General Plan, Sharp Park Specific Plan, and Economic Development Study, and drafted a Request for Qualifications for interested developers Community Design Element (CD)
CD-I-7: Commercial and Mixed-Use Building Form. Seek to ensure that new commercial and mixed-use development creates an attractive and human-scaled built environment. Update the Zoning Ordinance and Design Guidelines to address mixed use access, building form, and building-sidewalk relationship.

The City adopted changes to the Zoning Ordinance as part of the Housing Element “Rezoning Program” on August 25, 2025, that include objective design and development standards for the new high-density residential and high-density mixed use residential zones that addressed building form, building-sidewalk interface, and pedestrian-oriented development along street frontages. The work done by the Planning Commission and City Council on these standards will inform future work on citywide objective design and development standards.

Land Use Element (LU)
LU-I-38: Lower Crespi Drive. Establish zoning provisions to facilitate compact, mixed-use redevelopment of older commercial and residential properties along lower Crespi Drive, consistent with the Mixed Use Center and Mixed Use Neighborhood designations as shown in the Land Use Diagram.

The City Council approved the third largest project in the past ten years at 570 Crespi Drive – a 19-unit, horizontal mixed use residential development that will provide approximately 3,000 square feet of street-facing commercial use along Crespi Drive and three below-market rate ownership units, among other features and benefits. The project contributes to a more diverse center of activity along Crespi Drive.

Circulation Element
CU-I-31: Neighborhood Bikeways. Develop a system of bikeways connecting all neighborhoods to the City’s north-south pathway consistent with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

The Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project installed new and improved existing Class 2 and Class 3 bike lanes along Palmetto Avenue, West Avalon Drive, and Esplanade Avenue. The project also enhanced pedestrian safety by installing quick-build painted bulb out safety zones at pedestrian crossings, curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at several intersections. The notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025.
8 Packet Pg. 157
Pacifica City Council 5
March 09, 2026
Open Space and Community Facilities Element (OC)
OC-I-15: Pedro Point Headlands. Complete the planned transfer of City-owned land on Pedro Point Headlands to an appropriate public or private land steward, and pursue land and/or trail easement acquisition if necessary to connect Headlands trails with the Coastal Trail in Pacifica.OC-I-63: Senior and Community Services.

The City Manager and staff from Community Development and Public Works participated in a multi-agency working group with representatives from the National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and the California Coastal Conservancy to continue advancement of this policy.

Conservation Element (CO)
CO-I-54: Climate Action Plan for Greenhouse Gas Reductions. Maintain and update the Climate Action Plan that focuses on feasible actions the City can take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from government, businesses, and residents in Pacifica.

In July 2025, the City adopted the Climate Action and Resiliency Plan (CARP), establishing Pacifica’s updated framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and advancing community resilience. The CARP builds upon prior climate planning efforts and provides a coordinated set of implementation actions addressing municipal operations, transportation and land use, building energy, waste reduction, water conservation, and community-based initiatives.

Following adoption of the CARP, the City Council established the Climate Action and Resiliency Committee (CARC) to support ongoing implementation, monitoring, and public engagement.

The CARC is charged with advising the City Council on prioritization of actions, reviewing progress toward emission reduction targets, and providing a public forum for continued community involvement.

In late 2025, staff formalized internal coordination of climate action efforts to align with the adopted CARP, consolidating existing initiatives and resource planning under a unified implementation framework. CARP actions were incorporated into departmental work planning processes and aligned with the City’s budget development and performance tracking systems, establishing an ongoing structure for cross-departmental implementation beginning in 2026.

Safety Element (SA)
SA-I-107: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Continue to maintain and update a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan as an implementation action for the Safety Element.

City staff representing Police, Fire, Community Development, and Public Works participated in the multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) kick off meeting and Cal Office of Emergency Services training. The LHMP update begins in 2026 and will require ongoing participation. In addition, staff collaborated with the San Mateo County Emergency Managers 8 Packet Pg. 158
Pacifica City Council 6
March 09, 2026
Office to promote the upcoming Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). As part of this effort, a community survey was distributed to gather input on hazards affecting local neighborhoods. The survey was promoted across multiple platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Nextdoor, and the City’s weekly Connect with Pacifica update.

3. Next Steps
The City Council should consider whether to accept the APR as prepared by staff and recommend submittal to HCD and OPR to meet statutory requirements.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

This action is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines as approval of the reports is a reporting requirement and will have no direct or indirect impacts on the environment; therefore, no California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review is required.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

The recommended action to adopt a Resolution accepting the City’s 2025 Annual Progress Reports is consistent with state law; therefore, no alternative action is identified.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The adoption of the Resolution accepting the City’s 2025 Annual Progress Reports is consistent with State law and is consistent with the following items in the Council-adopted Strategic Plan and Priority Work Plan for FY 2023-2030:
• Goal 1: Enhance organizational and fiscal stability.
o Strategy C: Prioritize implementation of the Economic Opportunities Study. • Goal 2: Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets, and facilities • Goal 3: Prioritize protection and development of affordable housing. o Strategy A: Complete the Housing Element Update.
o Strategy C: Prioritize Housing Element program implementation. • Goal 4: Pursue climate change adaptation and mitigation. o Strategy A: Update the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, including performance measures.
o Strategy C: Update Pacifica’s Local Coastal Land Use Plan and improve communications and collaboration with the California Coastal Commission. • Goal 5: Broaden public communications and collaboration. o Strategy A: Creatively and appropriately leverage community expertise and volunteers to advance City priorities.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact. This is an information item only. However, timely filing of the Housing Element APR is important to retain eligibility for Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) 8 Packet Pg. 159
Pacifica City Council 7
March 09, 2026
funding.

ORIGINATED BY:

Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables(PDF) Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (PDF) 8 Packet Pg. 160
Pacifica City Council 8
March 09, 2026
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA ACCEPTING THE CITY’S 2025 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND 2025 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN; AND DIRECTING

THE CITY MANAGER TO TRANSMIT THE REPORTS TO THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF

LAND USE AND CLIMATE INNOVATION
WHEREAS, California Government Code section 65400(a) requires that planning agencies prepare annual reports on the status of the General Plan progress and its implementation, including an annual report on progress in meeting the City’s share of regional housing needs and local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing; and
WHEREAS, the housing element portion of the annual report must be prepared using the standards, forms, and definitions adopted by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and must be filed with the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation (LCI), formerly the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and HCD annually by April 1st of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the annual reports required by Government Code section 65400(a) at a public meeting where members of the public were allowed to provide oral testimony and written comments; and
WHEREAS, the City has made significant progress in implementing the policies contained in the City’s General Plan, including the Housing Element.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica as follows:

A. The above recitals are true and correct and material to this Resolution.

B. This action is not a project as defined in Section 15378(b) (2) of the CEQA Guidelines as this is a reporting requirement and will have no direct or indirect impacts on the environment; therefore, no California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review is required.

C. The City Council hereby accepts the City’s 2025 Annual Progress Report regarding implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan, attached hereto and hereinafter incorporated as Exhibit A, and the 2025 Annual Progress Report regarding implementation of the other Elements of the General Plan, attached hereto and incorporated as Exhibit B.

D. The City Manager is hereby directed to transmit the two Annual Progress Reports to the HCD and the LCI, in forms provided by the Community Development Director and reviewed by the City Attorney.
8 Packet Pg. 161
Pacifica City Council 9
March 09, 2026
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 9th day of March 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 8 Packet Pg. 162
Pacifica City Council 10 March 09, 2026
EXHIBIT A.
2025 HOUSING ELEMENT ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
8 Packet Pg. 163
Pacifica City Council 11 March 09, 2026
EXHIBIT B.
2025 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
8 Packet Pg. 164
Jurisidiction Name
Reporting Calendar Year
First Name
Last Name
Title Click here to download APR Instructions
Email
Phone
Street Address
City
Zipcode
v_11_24_25
Click here to add rows to a table. If you add too many
rows, you may select a cell in the row you wish to
remove and type ctrl + d.
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica
94044
Elizabeth
Brooks
Management Analyst II
[email protected]
6505016025
Mailing Address
Please Start Here
General Information
2025
Pacifica
Contact Information
Optional: Click here to import last year's data. This is best used when the workbook is new and empty. You
will be prompted to pick an old workbook to import
from. Project and program data will be copied exactly
how it was entered in last year's form and must be
updated. If a project is no longer has any reportable
activity, you may delete the project by selecting a cell in the row and typing ctrl + d.

Annual Progress Report

8.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Year 2025
Housing Element Planning Period 6th Cycle
Current Year
Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
0 Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
0 Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
6 Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
5 Deed
Restricted
0 Non-Deed
Restricted
54 20
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
Single-family Attached 0 0 0
Single-family Detached 1 2 0
2 to 4 units per structure 2 0 0
5+ units per structure 19 0 24
Accessory Dwelling Unit 6 17 7
Mobile/Manufactured Home 0 0 0
Total 28 19 31
Infill Housing Developments and Infill Units Permitted # of Projects Units 13 12
77 34
40 39000
Income Rental Ownership Total
Acutely Low 00 0
Extremely Low 00 0
Very Low 00 0
Low 00 0
Moderate 00 0 Above Moderate 00 0
Total 0 0 0
Streamlining Provisions Used - Permitted Units # of Projects Units SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone 00
SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split 00 AB 2011 (2022) 00 SB 6 (2022) 00
SB 423 (2023) 00
Ministerial and Discretionary Applications
# of
Applications Units
Ministerial 30 33
Discretionary 47
Density Bonus Applications and Units Permitted
Number of Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Units in Applications Submitted Requesting a Density Bonus 0 Number of Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus
0 Number of Units in Projects Permitted with a Density Bonus 0 Housing Element Programs Implemented and Sites Rezoned Count 190
30 Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Programs Implemented
Sites Rezoned to Accommodate the RHNA
(Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Units Constructed - SB 423 Streamlining Permits
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications Approved
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Acutely Low
Extremely Low
Data is auto-populated based on data entered in Tables A, A2, C, and D Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 423 Streamlining Provisions - Applications
Number of SB 423 Streamlining Applications
Above Moderate
Indicated as Infill
Not Indicated as Infill
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level

8.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Historic Sites Application Status Project Type Notes 2 34 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit Category
(SFA,SFD,2 to
4,5+,ADU,MH)
Tenure
R=RenterO=Owner
Date
Application
Submitted
(see
instructions)
Acutely LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Acutely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Extremely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
LowIncome
Deed
Restricted
Low-Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total

PROPOSED
Units by
Project
Total

APPROVED
Units by
project
Total

DISAPPROVE
D Units by
Project
Please select
state
streamlining
provision/s the
application was
submitted
pursuant to.

Is this project
located on a
site with an
associated
historical
designation as
outlined in
Government
Code Section
65400(a)(2)(N)
and reported on
Table L?
Did the
housing
development
application
seek
incentives or
concessions
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915?
Were
incentives or
concessions
requested
pursuant to
Government
Code section
65915
approved?
Please
indicate the
status of the
application.

Is the project
considered a
ministerial
project or
discretionary
project?
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 6 20 40 39 0 009-151-010 341 Fremont Ave 341 Fremont Ave - ADU 60939-25 ADU O 7/14/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 009-554-410 449 Lynbrook Dr 449 Lynbrook Dr - ADU 61247-25 ADU O 9/12/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 023-013-010 1200 Danmann Ave 1200 Danmann Ave - ADU 59871-25 ADU R 2/20/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 022-241-320 720 Corona Dr 720 Corona Dr - ADU 61380-25 ADU O 9/30/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 016-092-030 1008 Mirador Ter 1008 Mirador Ter - SFD 59752-25 SFD O 1/22/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial023-021-110 1493 Grand Ave 1493 Grannd Ave - ADU 63029-25 ADU O 12/8/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 016-334-060
420 Pacific Avenue 420 Pacific Ave SB 9 2025-006
SFD O
5/1/2025
0 SB 9 (2021) -
Residential Lot
Split
No No N/A Approved Ministerial
No units associated with this application.
022-241-280
704 Corona Drive 704 Corona Dr SB 9 2025-009
SFD O
5/16/2025
0 SB 9 (2021) -
Residential Lot
Split
No No N/A Approved Ministerial
No units associated with this application.
023-603-010
1011 Park Pacifica Avenue 1011 Park Pacifica SB 9 2025-027 SFD O
8/25/2025
1 1 1 SB 9 (2021) -
Residential Lot
Split
No No N/A Approved Ministerial
009-041-300 213 Forest Park Dr. 213 Forest Park Dr ADU 61371-25 ADU R 9/29/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 016-031-030 20 Carmel Ave. 20 Carmel Ave ADU 59931-25 ADU R 3/3/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 023-122-260 843 Montezuma Dr. 843 Montezuma Dr ADU 61448-25 ADU R 10/9/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 022-031-050 428 Donaldson Ave. 428 Donaldson Ave ADU 63045-25 ADU R 12/11/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 009-111-230 410 Farallon Ave. 410 Farallon Ave ADU 59726-25 ADU R 1/17/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 023-038-380 175 Olympian Way 175 Olympian Way ADU 59942-25 ADU R 3/7/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 022-031-330 419 Harvey Way 419 Harvey Way ADU 61235-25 ADU R 9/11/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 022-183-190 759 Arguello Dr. 759 Arguello Dr ADU 59858-25 ADU R 2/18/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 018-112-120 116 Berendos Ave. 116 Berendos Ave SFD 61148-25 SFD O 8/21/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 022-310-050 1 Picardo Ranch Rd. 1 Picardo Ranch Rd SFD 2024-009 SFD O 9/24/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Pending Discretionary022-052-310 501 Santa Cruz Ter. 501 Santa Cruz Ter SB 9 2024-020
2 to 4 O
6/24/2025
2 2 2 SB 9 (2021) -
Duplex in SF
Zone
No No No Approved Ministerial
022-022-140; -150 455 Old County Rd. 455 Old County Rd. Mixed- Use 2024-024 2 to 4 R 3/14/2025 4 4 4 NONE No No No Pending Discretionary 009-163-060 109 West Avalon Dr. 9 West Avalon Dr ADU ACD 2024-030 ADU R 8/21/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Approved Ministerial 022-150-520 Lot 8, Ohlone Dr Lot 8 Ohlone Dr. SFD 2025-010 SFD O 12/3/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No No Pending Discretionary 018-113-420 196 Dardenelle Ave 196 Dardenelle Ave ADU 59837-25 ADU R 2/11/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial 009-501-270 261 Catalina Ave 261 Catalina Ave ADU 59915-25 ADU R 2/27/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial016-191-410 163 Santa Rosa Ave 163 Santa Rosa Ave ADU 60881-25 ADU R 6/27/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial009-255-280 211 Milagra Dr 211 Milagra Dr ADU 61104-25 ADU R 8/14/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial022-192-200 935 Anza Dr 935 Anza Dr ADU 61330-25 ADU R 9/22/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial023-231-080 1044 Monte Verde Dr 1044 Monte Verde Dr
ADU 60019-25 ADU R 3/24/2025
1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial
009-067-140 140 Gordon Way 140 Gordon Way 2025-012 SFD O 6/10/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Discretionary 016-092-040 and 016-092-050
990 Mirador Ter 990 Mirador Ter 2025-038
SFD O
10/3/2025
2 2 2 SB 9 (2021) -
Residential Lot
Split
No No N/A Pending Ministerial
016-304-090
195 Brighton Rd 195 Brighton Rd 2025-018
2 to 4 R
9/26/2025
4 4 4 SB 9 (2021) -
Residential Lot
Split
No No N/A Pending Ministerial
SB9 ULS and duplex development. In coastal zone, which requires CDP (discretionary) approval 009-282-110 125 Shell St 125 Shell St 2025-040 ADU R 10/29/2025 1 1 1 NONE No No N/A Pending Ministerial In coastal zone, requires ACDP (discretionary) approval 023-551-550 1301 Lerida 1301 Lerida ADU 61332-25 ADU R 1/30/2025 1 1 NONE No No N/A Approved Ministerial 0 Table A
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Density Bonus Law Applications 11 Housing Development Applications Submitted
Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes

8.a
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulasPlanning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 Table A2
23 56 89
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Acutely Low- Income Deed Restricted Acutely Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Extremely Low- Income Deed Restricted Extremely Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Entitlement Date Approved # of Units issued Entitlements Acutely Low- Income Deed Restricted Acutely Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Extremely Low- Income Deed Restricted Extremely Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits Acutely Low- Income Deed Restricted y Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 1 219 28 00000 6 05 0 5 4 20 0 022-162-310 570 Crespi 570 Crespi File No.: 2016-004 5+ O 2 116 12/2/2025 19 0 009-151-010 341 Fremont Ave 341 Fremont Ave 60939-25 ADU O 0 1
7/14/2025
1 009-554-410 449 Lynbrook Dr 449 Lynbrook Dr 61247-25 ADU O 0 1 9/12/2025 1023-013-010 1200 Danmann Ave 1200 Danmann Ave 59871-25 ADU R 0 1
2/20/2025
1 022-241-320 720 Corona Dr 720 Corona Dr 61380-25 ADU O 0 1
9/30/2025
1 016-092-030 1008 Mirador Ter 1008 Mirador Ter 59752-25 SFD O 0 1
1/22/2025
1 023-021-110 1493 Grand Ave 1493 Grand Ave 63029-25 ADU O 0 1
12/8/2025
1 016-334-060
420 Pacific Avenue 420 Pacific Ave SB 9 2025-006 SFD O
12/11/2025 0
0 022-241-280
704 Corona Drive 704 Corona Dr SB 9 2025-009 SFD O
10/15/2025 0
0 023-603-010 1011 Park Pacifica
Avenue
1011 Park Pacifica
SB 9 2025-027 SFD O 1 12/10/2025 1 0
009-041-300
213 Forest Park Dr. 213 Forest Park Dr ADU 61371-25
ADU
R
0 1 9/29/2025 1
016-031-030
20 Carmel Ave. 20 Carmel Ave ADU 59931-25
ADU
R
0 1 3/3/2025 1
023-122-260
843 Montezuma Dr. 843 Montezuma Dr ADU 61448-25 ADU R 0 0 022-031-050
428 Donaldson Ave. 428 Donaldson Ave ADU 63045-25 ADU R 0 1 12/11/2025 1 009-111-230
410 Farallon Ave. 410 Farallon Ave ADU 59726-25 ADU R 0 1 1/17/2025 1 023-038-380
175 Olympian Way 175 Olympian Way ADU 59942-25 ADU R 0 0 022-031-330
419 Harvey Way 419 Harvey Way ADU 61235-25 ADU R 0 0
022-183-190
759 Arguello Dr. 759 Arguello Dr ADU 59858-25
ADU
R
0 0
018-112-120
116 Berendos Ave. 116 Berendos Ave SFD 61148-25 SFD O 0 1 8/21/2025 1 022-052-310
501 Santa Cruz Ter. 501 Santa Cruz Ter SB 9 2024-020 2 to 4 O 11 6/24/2025 2 0 009-163-060
109 West Avalon Dr.

West Avalon Dr ADU A
2024-030
ADU
R 1
8/21/2025 1
0 018-113-420 196 Dardenelle Ave
SFD - ADU Attached 59837-25
ADU R
0 1
2/11/2025
1 009-501-270
261 Catalina Ave
SFD - ADU Attached 59915-25
ADU R
0 1
2/27/2025
1 016-191-410 163 Santa Rosa Ave
SFD - ADU Attached 60881-25
ADU R
0 1
6/27/2025
1 009-255-280 211 Milagra Dr
SFD - ADU Detached 61104-25
ADU R
0 1
8/14/2025
1 022-192-200
935 Anza Dr
SFD - ADU Detached 61330-25
ADU R
0 1
9/22/2025
1 023-231-080
1044 Monte Verde Dr SFD - ADU Existing
Area 60019-25
ADU R
0 1
3/24/2025
1 023-622-060 1335 Aspen Dr 1335 Aspen Dr ADU 61309-25 ADU R 1 9/18/2025
1 0
023-062-030 728 Montezuma Dr
728 Montezuma Dr
ADU 61326-25 ADU
R 1 9/22/2025
1 0
022-382-240 1115 Glacier Ave 1115 Glacier Ave ADU 61376-25 ADU R 1 9/29/2025 1 0 009-115-270 309 Bancroft Way 309 Bancroft Way ADU 61525-25 ADU R 1 10/27/2025 1 0 023-461-170 1157 Manzanita Drive 1157 Manzanita Drive B2025-00749 ADU O 0 1
8/8/2025
1 022-083-030 801 Fassler Drive Duplexes 2014-004 5+ O 2 2 20 3/19/2018 24 22 20
4/28/2021
24 023-052-140 655 Navarre 655 Navarre ADU 60153-25 ADU R 0 1
4/23/2025
1 023-551-550 1301 Lerida 1301 Lerida ADU 61332-25 ADU R 1 1/30/2025 1 1
9/22/2025
1 0
0 0
0 0 0
1 Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits 4 7
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Table A2 Page 1 of 2

8.a
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Streamlining Historic Sites Infill Housing without Financial Assistance or Deed Restrictions Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction Notes 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Acutely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Extremely LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Extremely LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Certificates of
Occupancy or other
forms of readiness
(see instructions) Date
Issued
# of Units issued
Certificates of Occupancy or
other forms of
readiness
Please select the
state streamlining
provision the project
was APPROVED
pursuant to. (may
select multiple)
Is this project
located on a site with
an associated
historical
designation as
outlined in
Government Code
Section
65400(a)(2)(N) and
reported on Table L?
Infill Units?
Y/N+
Assistance Programs
for Each Development
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
Deed Restriction
Type
(may select multiple -
see instructions)
For units affordable without
financial assistance or deed
restrictions, explain how the
locality determined the units
were affordable
(see instructions)
Term of Affordability or
Deed Restriction (years)
(if affordable in perpetuity
enter 1000)+
Number of
Demolished/Destroyed
Units
Demolished or
Destroyed Units
Demolished/De
stroyed Units
Owner or
Renter
Total Density Bonus Applied to
the Project (Percentage
Increase in Total Allowable
Units or Total Maximum
Allowable Residential Gross
Floor Area)
Number of Other
Incentives,
Concessions, Waivers,
or Other Modifications
Given to the Project
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
0000 2 2 2 2 2 21 31 1
0 NONE No Y Other INC 45 1 Demolished O0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey 0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
1 5/14/2025 1 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No N0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey0 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split No N N/A 0 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split No N N/A
0 SB 9 (2021) - Residential Lot Split No N N/A
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
1 12/16/2025 1 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
1 6/26/2025 1 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey1 9/17/2025 1 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey 1 11/4/2025 1 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No Y N/A
0 SB 9 (2021) - Duplex in SF Zone No N ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU SURVEY 0 NONE No N ABAG ADU Survey
1 11/5/2025 1 NONE No N ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No N ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No N ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No N ABAG ADU Survey
1 3/26/2025 1 NONE No N ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey 2 2 20 12/31/2025 24 NONE No N Other INC 45 Remaining units will receive final inspection for occ panc in 2026
0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey0 NONE No Y ABAG ADU Survey000 Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy Density Bonus 10 Housing with Financial Assistance and/or
Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units
Table A2 Page 2 of 2

8.a
Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element ImplementationPlanning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 1 Projection
Period 34
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level
Projection
Period -
06/30/2022-
01/30/2023
2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Total Units
to Date (all
years)
Total Remaining
RHNA by
Income Level
Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - 6 - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - 6 7 6 - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted - 4 8 5 - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted 15 8 - 5 - - - - - - Above Moderate 753 2 5 5 4 - - - - - - 16 737
1,892
17 29 20 20 - - - - - - 86 1,806
Income Level
Very Low
6 -
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs.

Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 2 Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
513
28 Moderate
538 310 291
17 25
Please note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected] Low - - *For years prior to 2025, data on deed-restricted vs. non-deed restricted Extremely Low-Income units is approximated from whether the projects reported any deed-restricted Very Low-Income Units. If you wish to edit this historical data for accuracy or have any questions about the data, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected] Units*For jurisdictions that received RHNA determinations for the current cycle prior to the passage of AB 3093 (September 19, 2024):- You were not allocated Acutely Low-Income and Extremely Low-Income RHNA targets, therefore the allocations in Field 1 are listed as "0" - If you wish to set your own targets in these income categories for informational purposes, contact HCD staff at [email protected] All Acutely Low-Income and Extremely Low-Income units reported during the cycle are counted towards Very-Low Income RHNA progress 263
Total RHNA
-
293 Low
*For years prior to 2025, Acutely Low-Income units are reported within the Extremely Low-Income categoryPlease Note: Table B does not currently contain data from Table F or Table F2 for prior years. You may login to the APR system to see Table B that contains this data.Extremeley Low -

8.a
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Year 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation
Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Date of
Rezone Rezone Type
2 4 5 6 7 9 10 11
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Date of
Rezone
Very LowIncome Low-Income Moderate- Income Above Moderate- Income Rezone Type Parcel Size (Acres) General Plan Designation Zoning Minimum Density Allowed Maximum Density Allowed Realistic Capacity Vacant/Nonvacant Description of Existing Uses 479 495 192 726 1430
009-245-030 751 Oceana Blvd 751 Oceana Blvd Site #02 8/25/2025 3 3 6 39 Shortfall of Sites 2.5 R-40 R-40 25 40 40 Vacant Vacant 018-140-450 4275 Coast Hwy 4275 Coast Hwy Site #10 8/25/2025 49 Shortfall of Sites 1.95 MU-60 MU-60 40 60 60 Non-Vacant Lumberyard, Building Materials
018-140-460 & 018-
140-470
Coast Hwy, Lat:

37.61261° N
Lon: 122.48821° W
Vacant - Coast Hwy Site #11 8/25/2025 34 35 Shortfall of Sites 1.43 MU-60 MU-60 40 60 60 Vacant Vacant 018-140-700 Coast Hwy, Lat:

37.61120° N
Lon: 122.49048° W
Vacant-Former
Caltrans -
Hwy 1 b/w 4300-
4400 Coast Hwy
Site #12 8/25/2025 84 85 Shortfall of Sites 3.48 MU-60 MU-60/HPD 40 60 60 Vacant Vacant Land former Caltrans
023-593-070 1055 Terra Nova Blvd Park Mall Site #16A 8/25/2025 17 Shortfall of Sites 0.41 MU-50 MU-50 30 50 50 Vacant Vacant/Neighborhood Shopping Park Mall
023-593-130 1035 Terra Nova Blvd Park Mall Site #16B 8/25/2025 4 3 37 Shortfall of Sites 2.97 MU-50 MU-50 30 50 50 Non-Vacant Neighborhood Shopping Park Mall
TBD Linda Mar Blvd/Coast
HWY
Caltrans Park n Ride
-
Across from Linda
Mar SC
Site #18 8/25/2025 26 27 Shortfall of Sites 2.1 MU-60 MU-60 40 60 60 Non-Vacant Cal Trans Park n Ride (across from Linda Mar
SC)
009-502-290 533 Hickey Blvd Filipino 7th Day
Adventist
Site #19 8/25/2025 15 Shortfall of Sites 1.65 MU-I-30 MU-I-30 20 30 30 Non-Vacant Filipino 7th Day Adventist 009-166-010,009-252-040,
& 009-252-050
104 Avalon Dr,
155 Milagra Dr,
& 151 Milagra Dr
PW Corp Yard Site #20 8/25/2025 25 25 Shortfall of Sites 0.81 MU-I-60 MU-I-60 40 60 60 Non-Vacant PW Corp Yard 009-293-070 401 Paloma Ave Oceana High School Site #21 8/25/2025 7 7 12 152 Shortfall of Sites 51.31 R-40 R-40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Oceana High School022-310-300 1450 Terra Nova Blvd Terra Nova High School
Site #22 8/25/2025 5 5 9 110 Shortfall of Sites 43.33 R-40 R-40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Terra Nova High School 023-593-140 1111 Terra Nova Blvd Sanchez Llibrary Site #24 8/25/2025 37 38 Shortfall of Sites 2.86 MU-I-50 MU-I-50 40 50 50 Non-Vacant Sanchez Library 009-610-110 Skyline Blvd/HWY 35 Caltrans Skyline
ROW
- Skyline Blvd
Site #25 8/25/2025 82 83 Shortfall of Sites 5.1 R-40 R-40 25 40 40 Vacant Caltrans Skyline ROW 009-134-130 Palmetto Ave, Manor
Plaza
Pacific Manor SC Site #27A 8/25/2025 1 2 3 31 Shortfall of Sites 0.76 MU-60 MU-60/CZ 40 60 60 Non-Vacant Pacific Manor Shoppingparking lot 009-134-150 Palmetto Ave, Manor
Plaza
Pacific Manor SC Site #27B 8/25/2025 2 2 4 45 Shortfall of Sites 1.6 MU-60 MU-60/CZ 40 60 60 Non-Vacant Pacific Manor Shoppingparking lot 009-440-110
& 009-440-120
777 Hickey Blvd &
Gateway Dr/Hickey Blvd
Fairmont SC Site #28 8/25/2025 1 2 3 35 Shortfall of Sites 5.5 MU-50 MU-50 30 50 50 Non-Vacant Fairmont Shopping Center, Mall Misc retail
023-041-190,203-041-200,
& 023-041-270
De Solo Dr-adjacent to
1290 & 1312 De Solo &
500 Linda Mar
Linda Mar SC Rear
Parking Lot &
Center
Site #29 8/25/2025 7 7 13 155 Shortfall of Sites 5.22 MU-50 MU-50 30 50 50 Non-Vacant Linda Mar Shopping Center Rear Parking
023-073-090 520 San Pedro Ave 520 San Pedro Ave Site #30 8/25/2025 12 Shortfall of Sites 0.96 MU-30 MU-30/CZ 20 30 30 Non-Vacant Builders Exchange 023-073-100
& 023-073-110
560 San Pedro Ave 560 San Pedro Ave Site #31 8/25/2025 30 Shortfall of Sites 1.24 MU-31 MU-30/CZ 20 30 30 Non-Vacant Ace Hardware/surface parking
009-164-200,009-164-210,
& 009-164-220
Oceana Blvd/ Manor Dr,
555 Oceana Blvd,
& 549 Oceana Blvd
Brentwood SC
& Oceana /Manor
Site #32 8/25/2025 48 49 Shortfall of Sites 3.1 MU-60 MU-60 40 60 60 Non-Vacant RetailInsurance/Taqueria, Brentwood Shopping
Center, Parking, & Older
Buildings
018-140-300
& 018-140-660
1) Coast Hwy
Lat: 37.61049° N
Lon: 122.49173° W
&
2) Coast Hwy
Lat: 37.61015° N
Lon: 122.49174° W
Vacant - Coast Hwy/
San Marlo Eastside
Site #38 8/25/2025 30 31 Shortfall of Sites 1.26 R-60 R-60 40 60 60 Vacant Vacant 017-470-100 730 Sharp Park Rd Latter Day Saints Site A 8/25/2025 52 Shortfall of Sites 4.39 MU-I-40 PF+/ HPD /MU-I40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Latter Day Saints009-360-520 2480 Skyline Blvd Ramallah Plaza Site B 8/25/2025 11 Shortfall of Sites 0.46 MU-30 MU-30 20 30 30 Non-Vacant Ramallah Plaza009-058-040 340 Waterford St Vacant - 340 Waterford St
Site D 8/25/2025 6 Shortfall of Sites 0.2 MU-40 MU-40 25 40 40 Vacant Vacant 009-058-030 340 Waterford St Car Wash - 340
Waterford
Site E 8/25/2025 11 Shortfall of Sites 0.33 MU-40 MU-40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Car Wash 023-593-160 Oddstad Blvd, Lat:

37.58253° N
Lon: 122.47625° W
Oddstad Blvd Site F 8/25/2025 16 Shortfall of Sites 2.33 R-40 R-40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Mostly Vacant w/ Accessory Structure
009-610-110 Skyline Blvd/Glencourt
Way
Skyline Water Tank Site G 8/25/2025 27 28 Shortfall of Sites 4.46 R-40 R-40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Skyline Water Tank 009-245-020 801 Oceana Blvd Pavillion of Flowers Site H 8/25/2025 42 Shortfall of Sites 1.29 MU-40 MU-40 25 40 40 Non-Vacant Pavillion of Flowers, Flower Shop/Funeral
Home
018-140-220 Coast Hwy, Lat:

37.60960° N
Lon: 122.49114° W
Vacant - Coast Hwy Site I 8/25/2025 36 37 Shortfall of Sites 1.51 R-60 R-60 40 60 60 Vacant Vacant 018-140-090 4400 Coast Hwy Lutheran Church Site J 8/25/2025 24 25 Shortfall of Sites 2.77 MU-I-60 MU-I-60 40 60 60 Non-Vacant Lutheran Church Note: "+" indicates an optional fieldCells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
3 8
Project Identifier RHNA Shortfall by Household Income Category Sites Description 1 Sites Identified or Rezoned to Accommodate Shortfall Housing Need and No Net-Loss Law Table C

8.a
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Year 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Create the regulatory framework to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) sites inventory, promote development of multi-family housing, including rental housing and missing middle housing. Address land use constraints to make the production of housing more likely. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

1. Amend General Plan Land Use designations and zoning designations to accommodate the RHNA by May 2025, as shown in Table 4. 5/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: The Council adopted General Plan Amendments and certified the EIR on August 11, 2025. The rezoning and zoning text amendments were adopted by ordinance on August 24, 2025. Note: Site 23 was not included in the zoning changes, however, all RHNA and State law requirements were satisfied (see HCD Email re: Sanchez Arts Center dated June 30, 2025: https://cityofpacifica.egnyte.com/dl/g8PxdgjHRw4T ) Units 1892
GP Text and Map Amendments Resolution No. 73-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21205/638919881353670000 EIR Resolution No. 72-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20911/638906085842030000Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 2. Completion of required rezonings. 5/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1 Units 1892 GP Text and Map Amendments Resolution No. 73-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21205/638919881353670000 EIR Resolution No. 72-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20911/638906085842030000Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 1. Progress towards meeting the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (units created) as described in each Annual Progress Report (APR). 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. Implementing Action 1 will be complete for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. See Tables A, A-2, B, C, F of this APR.

Other 1 Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

2.Review the zoning regulations and map to identify inconsistencies between the general plan densities and uses and the currently adopted zoning regulations and amend accordingly to resolve (selected sites on Table 3). 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

3.Submit an amendment of the Local Coastal Land Use Plan Update to the California Coastal Commission for land use changes proposed for sites 27A, 27B, 30, and 31 by December 2025 to implement actions 1 and 2 in HE-I-1 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: Local Coastal Plan Amendment for Sharp Park Specific Plan has been submitted to the Coastal Commission. Submission of Local Coastal Plan Amendment for Housing Element, Emergency Shelters, and other zoning amendments Coastal Commission is planned by Q1 2026.

Other
Link to March, 2025 LCLUP: https://cityofpacifica.egnyte.com/fl/U9k9pwjPy4#folder-link/2%20-%20City%20of%20Pacifica's%20LCLUP%20Certification%20Draft%20March%202025?p=ae182517-aaa1-4d18-93d2-e2f3513d9e59 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 5. Submission of an amendment of the Local Coastal Land Use Plan Update. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-1.3. Other Link to March, 2025 LCLUP: https://cityofpacifica.egnyte.com/fl/U9k9pwjPy4#folder-link/2%20-%20City%20of%20Pacifica's%20LCLUP%20Certification%20Draft%20March%202025?p=ae182517-aaa1-4d18-93d2-e2f3513d9e59 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA

4.Complete any required CEQA environmental analysis for redesignation and rezoning in program HE-I1 by May 2025. 5/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: The Council certified the EIR on August 11, 2025. The Draft EIR was published December 13, 2024. Other 1 EIR Resolution No. 72-2025 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20911/6389060858420300 00 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

5. Initiate State of California decertification process for any Caltrans or other State-owned site (sites 18, 25, G), including making an initial deposit of funds (approximately $35,000 in 2022) by June 2025, and designate sites as required. It is anticipated that the City may partner with nonprofit housing developers for these sites. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In progress: See status of Program HE-I-3. Other See Supporting Documents for Program HE-I-3.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

6. City Council to evaluate potential of City-owned sites (including Sanchez Art Center, Sanchez Library, and Corp Yard) and seek affordable housing developer interest in conformance with any applicable Surplus Land Act (SLA) requirements. By December 2026, determine the process under the SLA by which the City will propose to transfer each site, which may include a declaration that a site is exempt under the SLA or that the City plans to issue a Notice of Availability to transfer a site. The City will prioritize affordable units on City-owned sites. See also HE-I-3.a. The City will prepare the required detail to commit to completion of the SLA and other required processes for City-owned sites in conformance with Government Code Article 8 (commencing with Section 54220) of Chapter 5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5. It will also complete coordination with the Pacifica School District and Jefferson Union High School District to complete the SLA process for school district-owned sites, and completion of the decertification process for Caltrans-owned sites within three years from the start of the planning period..b. The City will prioritize development of City-owned sites in the RCAA.c. Backup Action is described below 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of Program HE-I-3. Other See Supporting Documents for Program HE-I-3.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 7. Issuance of RFP for City-owned sites. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of Program HE-I-3. Other See Supporting Documents for Program HE-I-3.

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Housing Programs Progress Report
Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583 Table D Page 1 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 9. Completion of Caltrans Decertification process State-owned land. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of Program HE-I-3. Other See Supporting Documents for Program HE-I-3.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

7. Work collaboratively with owners of public or semi-public sites that have potential for development and identify potential housing developers to facilitate development of the site. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of Program HE-I-3. Other See Supporting Documents for Program HE-I-3.

HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

8. Rezone to implement state Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1) and 65583.2 subdivisions (c), (h), and (i) to allow approval of residential developments “by-right” if at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to low income:a. The three sites identified in multiple housing elements: Sites 24, 27A, and 27B. These sites will be rezoned such that they will allow at least 16 units on each site and rezoned to allow a density of at least 20 units per acre in accordance with Government Code section 65583.2, see also Table 4 and Table F11 for site-specific rezoning details. Site 24 is the Sanchez Library located at 1111 Terra Nova Blvd. Sites 27A and 27B are in the Pacific Manor Shopping Center located at 440-494 Manor Plaza. b. Sites identified to be rezoned to accommodate a shortfall for the lower-income RHNA, listed on Table 4, Table F-11, and Table F-12: Sites 2, 11, 12, 16B, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27A, 27B, 28, 29, 32, 38, G, I, and J. These sites will be rezoned such that they will allow at least 16 units on each site and rezoned to allow a density of at least 20 units per acre in accordance with Government Code section 65583.2, see Table 4, Table F-11, and Table F-12 for site-specific rezoning details 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1 Other 1 GP Text and Map Amendments Resolution No. 73-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21205/638919881353670000 EIR Resolution No. 72-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20911/638906085842030000Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

9. Existing recreational facilities, such as playing fields on public sites to be preserved if possible 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous Ongoing: Preservation of existing fields continues to be considered in rezoning actions. Other 1 None HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

10. Rezone the following core RHNA sites to 60 dwelling units per acre:a. Site 10: 4275 Coast Hwy, Lumberyard (49 units, Moderate Income)b. Site 18: Linda Mar Park & Ride (53 units, Lower Income)c. Site 27A: Pacific Manor Shopping Center (37 units, Above Moderate with Below Market RateInclusionary)d. Site 27B: Pacific Manor Shopping Center (53 units, Above Moderate with Below Market RateInclusionary)e. Site 32: Brentwood Shopping Center (97 units, Lower Income) 5/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1 Units 1 GP Text and Map Amendments Resolution No. 73-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21205/638919881353670000 EIR Resolution No. 72-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20911/638906085842030000Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

11. Rezone the following surplus sites to 60 dwelling units per acre: a.Site 12: Former Caltrans, now private (169 units, Lower Income) 5/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1 Units 1 GP Text and Map Amendments Resolution No. 73-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21205/638919881353670000 EIR Resolution No. 72-2025https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20911/638906085842030000Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to
Achieve RHNA

12. Review, and where appropriate amend, the Zoning Code to establish a By-Right designation for housing sites that propose a minimum of 20% units affordable to lower income to meet the lower income RHNAshortfall, and other requirements in accordance with Government Code 65583 (c) (1) and 65583.2 (h). 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1 Other 1 Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

13. Amend Zoning Code for the commercial and mixed-use sites included to achieve RHNA to require a minimum amount of residential within the development and prohibit 100% commercial uses and other requirements in accordance with Government Code section 65583.2 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1. Other 1 Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA 14(a). Amend zoning code to remove constraints to housing production including:a. Reduce the off-street parking requirement for studio and one-bedroom units to one parking space per unit (covered or uncovered), and to require no guest parking for such units citywide. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress and Partially Completed (Implementation Action HE-I-14 (b: Established parking requirements for rezoned sites (Table 4) which included no guest parking for studio and one bedrooms. Removal of guest parking requirements for studio and citywide requires additional analysis to be completed under HE-I-2.

Other
Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 3. Completion of zoning revisions to reduce off-street parking as described above. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress and Partially Completed: See status of HE-I-1.14 (a). Other Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/6389182042641700 00 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA 14 (b, c, d). Amend zoning code to remove constraints to housing production including:b. Revise use and density descriptions regarding the term “Family” within the zoning regulations citywide. The definition of family will affirm persons with disabilities are not subject to any potential special regulations such as the number of persons, population types, licenses, higher discretionary standardsor other requirements that do not apply to other residential uses in the same zoning district.c. Increase height limits where necessary to achieve RHNA capacity on sites as indicated on Table 4.d. Reduce setbacks where necessary to achieve RHNA capacity on sites as indicated on Table 4. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed
Completed: Implementation action 14 (b), (c), and (d). Rezoning and zoning text amendments on the listed sites were adopted by ordinance on August 24, 2025. See status of HE-I-1.1. Other 1 Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000 HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 4. Completion of zoning revisions to update the definition of family as described above. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Complete: See status of HE-I-1.14(b). Other 1 Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/6389182042641700 00 Table D Page 2 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

15. Pipeline Projects:a. Establish a monitoring program for pipeline projects citywide that will include tracking of planning and building applications filed, status of approvals, and breakdown of project status by affordable and market rate units.b. Contact 10 expiring planning applications per year, prioritizing by total number of units and those with deed restricted affordability or market-produced affordability, to monitor status and interest in pursuing project, and to identify any reasonable opportunities for City assistance to avoid expiration of project approvals.
12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: City initiated work on permit tracking software in Q4 of 2025. Other None HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 8. Contact with ten 10 expiring planning applications per year. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-1.15. Other None HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

16. Mid-Cycle Review:a. A mid-cycle review of the status of progress toward reaching RHNA will be completed in 2027. b. A mid-cycle review of the status of pipeline projects will be completed in 2027 and will include tracking of planning and building applications filed, status of approvals, and breakdown of project status by affordable and market rate units. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA Metric 6. Completion of mid-cycle review. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-1: General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA

17. Implementation to begin by June 2023 and requires significant effort through December 2026. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Modernize zoning code to make it easier to use, foster greater development in select areas, and streamline the application submittal and review processes. Address land use and processing and permitting procedure constraints to make the production of housing more likely. This program is a citywide comprehensive code update to remove barriers to housing development, improve the function and interpretation of the zoning code, and to ensure consistency with the updated 2040 General Plan. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Applies citywide except as noted:1. Comprehensive Zoning Regulation modernization to increase the potential for development with a focus on areas identified in the general plan for increased density. The potential changes described within this action item are intended to facilitate housing development in areas identified for increased density in the General Plan and are not required to demonstrate RHNA capacity. By December 2027 the City will consider the following: a. Increase height limits.b. Redefine density calculations from gross area to form based or another mechanism to allow greater density while still enforcing design standards.c. Add additional definition or refinement to the municipal code: i. Align development standards between rental and for sale d. Increase density. e. Increase Floor Area Ratio (FAR) f. Reduce off-street parking requirements g. Reduce setbacks h. Require a minimum of 50 percent of floor area dedicated to residential uses in selected mixed-use developments i. Allow residential in select non-residential zones (evaluate standards for maintaining employment development)j. Establish other objective standards to enable ministerial approval of multi-family projects for lowerincome levels as a permitted use for projects up to 20 dwelling units in all multi-family and mixed-use zones. Establish ministerial site-plan review for multi-family developments up to 20 units (and any housing portion of mixed-use projects) k. Prohibit single-family residential development in multi-family and mixed-use zones. l. Establish multi-family uses as permitted in mixed use zones m. Other code updates to make development requirements easier to understand. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development. Introduced an ordiance initiating changes to C-2 Zoning Distrcit to inlcude horizontal mixed-use, consistent with the General Plan Mixed-Use designations. (Introduced 12/2/2025, adopted 1/12/2026) The City also engaged a consultant engaged in Q4 of 2025 to initiate a process mapping analysis for additional permit review streamlining.

Other
Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/6389968159531300 00 Resolution Accepting Grant Award from the Partnership for the Bay’s Future Policy Fund: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1671&MediaPosition=&ID=5825&CssClass=Ordinance No. 905-C.S. TO... AMEND SECTION 9-4.1101(b) OF THEPACIFICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD RESIDENTIAL USES IN HORIZONTAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS AS CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES IN THE C-2 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/22085/6390397845137000 00 HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining Metric 1. Adopt a comprehensive update to the City’s Zoning Regulations. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1 HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

2. Establish minimum transportation-related objective standards including but not limited to minimum site distance, turning radii, driveway/drive aisle width, on-street and off-street parking design, nonvehicular transportation features (e.g., bike lanes and sidewalks), and street width standards 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

3. Adopt Objective Design Standards for multi-family residential projects and mixed-use projects with a residential component. Development of Objective Design Standards began in fall of 2023 to be adopted by June 2025 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress and Partially Completed: Completed: ODS for rezone sites (see Table 4) was completed. The rezoning and zoning text amendments on the listed sites were adopted by ordinance on August 24, 2025.In Progress: Citywide ODS. A consultant was engaged in November 2025 to continue advance implementation of Objective Design Standards. In addition, as a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development. See also status of HE-I-2.1.

Other
Ordinance No. 902-C.S. https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21179/638918204264170000Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/638996815953130000 Resolution Accepting Grant Award from the Partnership for the Bay’s Future Policy Fund: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1671&MediaPosition=&ID=5825&CssClass= HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

4. Amend Planned-Development Zoning District to eliminate potential barriers to multi-family and affordable housing development, including but not limited to reconsideration of the cost revenue analysis and general list of price ranges requirements. Clarify language regarding multi-family developments and the term “unit” in this context by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

5. Develop Zoning Code amendments to align with SB 330 objective standard requirements and make a recommendation to the City Council by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

Table D Page 3 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

6. Establish priority building permit processing and reduced plan check times for multi-family housing projects affordable to lower-income households or units that serve special needs populations. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

7. Establish a process to facilitate ministerial approvals where feasible to expedite the review and approval of housing projects. For example, establishing projects of up to 20 dwelling units that are affordable to lower- income households as a permitted use in multi-family and mixed-use zones 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

8. The City shall initiate a standard operating procedure where the Planning Department determines the level of CEQA review for a proposed development within 30 days after deeming a development application complete, with a possible 15-day extension if the project applicant and lead agency agree, in accordance with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21080.2. The timeframes for processing applications after a CEQA determination shall be in accordance with the Permit Streamlining Act, Government Code 65950(a)(5). If a project is found to be exempt from CEQA, then relevant provisions of the Permit Streamlining Act shall apply, and the application shall be processed within 60 days (Gov. Code 65950(a)(5). 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Continuous Complete and Continuous: Applications are processed in conformance with the terms of this Implementation Action and this continues to be the standard operating procedure. Other 1 None HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining Metric 2. Provide a 30-day response to all application submittals. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Continuous Complete and Continuous: Applications are processed in conformance with the terms of this Implementation Action and this continues to be the standard operating procedure. Other 1 None HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

9. Revise Site Development Permit (PSD) findings for approval to remove subjective findings required to approve residential projects or mixed-use projects that include residential use. The revised findings will focus on verifying objective development standard, objective design standard, and objective transportation standard compliance.
12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

10. Revise zoning to remove the requirement for approval of a Conditional Use Permit (UP) to authorize residential uses consistent with the General Plan including but not limited to land use and density. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

11. Rezone properties that are undeveloped, designated in the General Plan for residential use, and zoned as P-D (Planned Development) to a non-P-D zoning classification aligned with their allowable use(s) and permissible densities in the General Plan to establish an approval process for these sites that does not require legislative approval by City Council (the Development Plan). a. Revise the criteria and findings associated with project approvals in the P-D zoning district to focus on objective standards compliance to streamline project review and approval for sites located in the HPD (Hillside Preservation District) overlay district that must be rezoned to P-D. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.1. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.1.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

12. Site assembly: to assist multi-parcel sites such as shopping centers establish a site consolidation incentive by December 2025. This could include a technical assistance program, specific planning processes, and/or establishing a graduated density incentive for lot consolidation or front-loading CEQA analysis to make the sites more likely to be redeveloped into housing/mixed use. a. Create an ombuds/liaison program to provide technical assistance to shopping center owners to facilitate the production of more housing, provide information on any applicable fees and development standards, provide additional informational resources as requested, and serve as a point of contact to provide information back to City staff regarding additional actions the City may take to facilitate site assembly and housing production on shopping center sites. 12/31/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: The City funded and hired the role of Housing and Economic Development Manager, to begin in January 2026 to provide capacity to advance this Implementation Action.

Other
Press Release: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21969/639020778321900000 HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Metric 4. Site assembly metric: Conduct outreach to at least 50% of owners of at least two shopping centers and create an ombuds/liaison program. 12/31/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City funded and hired the role of Housing and Economic Development Manager, to begin in January 2026 to provide capacity to advance this Implementation Action. Other Press Release: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21969/639020778321900000 HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

13. Incentivize the production of large units with 3 or more bedrooms to meet the needs of lower income families by reducing parking requirements for units that include 3 or more bedrooms and are affordable to lower-income households.
12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: A joint Planning Commission and City Council study session was held on October 6, 2025, regarding updates to inclusionary housing ordinances and fees and density bonus ordinance. Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Ordinance update language is under development with support of HEART and is on track to be presented to Council in early 2026. The Ordinance is planned to include language to incentivize larger units.

Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining
Metric 5. Large unit metric: create a parking incentive for 3 or more-bedroom units that will assist at least 25 units. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-2.13. Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-2.13.

HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

14. Initiate any required CEQA environmental analysis for the comprehensive zoning modernization program by January 2026 1/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining

15. Implementation to begin by December 2023 and will require significant effort through December 2027. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-2: Zoning Modernization and Streamlining Metric 3. Monitor and reduce development review process timeline for housing projects. 12/31/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City also engaged a consultant engaged in Q4 of 2025 to initiate a process mapping analysis. Other NoneHE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites Accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation Sites Inventory by evaluating public lands to support future housing development. Address constraints associated with land cost and land use controls. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including requests to develop at less than allowed densities; General Plan land use constraints; zoning and permit findings and other constraints on residential density; parking standards, clustered housing standards; multifamily housing. It also directly addresses processing and permitting procedures including those around findings, exemption from standards, residential uses in commercial zoning districts, and the definition of family. This program will also indirectly address the nongovernmental constraints related to land cost and construction costs. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

Table D Page 4 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

1. The City will pursue a specific strategy tailored to each of the following types of publicly owned sites. a. District Sites: Proactively engage school district landowners including the Jefferson Union High School District and Pacifica School District, to develop a common long-range land use vision for all property owned by the school districts within the city in 2024 and 2025. The City will develop a development “Toolkit” establishing a working schedule of steps, review processes, and identifying opportunities for streamlining. By June 2025, hold a meeting with District representatives to discuss ways for the City to support the District in facilitating housing development on District-owned land.

Items to discuss with the District include: (i) offering for the City to serve as the lead agency for environmental review, (ii) early-development support including coordination during the SLA and RFP development process to increase certainty on development potential for the site, (iii) provide early information on any applicable fees, and (iv) setting a schedule for frequent meetings throughout the processing to streamline review. Target December 2027 to release draft comprehensive objective development standards. See also Program HE-I-1. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: A consultant was engaged in November 2025 to initiate master planning and implementation for public sites, including creation of a community engagement plan, conducting site-specific test fit analysis on City-owned site #24, facilitate proactive engagement with school districts and Caltrans, conduct research on SLA requirements, and examine other City-owned sites.

Units
Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/638996815953130000 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites Metric 2. Hold at least one meeting with each school district regarding district owned properties and corp yard site by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

1. The City will pursue a specific strategy tailored to each of the following types of publicly owned sites. b. State-Owned Land (Sites 18, 25, G: Caltrans and Skyline Water Tank): See Program HE-I-1, which will revise the land use designations and associated zoning to ensure the sites will have capacity for the RHNA numbers assigned. By June 2025, hold a meeting with State representatives to discuss ways for the City to support the State in facilitating housing development on State-owned land. Items to discuss include: (i) offering for the City serve the lead agency for environmental review, (ii) early-development support including coordination during the SLA and RFP development process to increase certainty on development potential for the site, (iii) provide early information on any applicable fees, and (iv) setting a schedule for frequent meetings throughout the processing to streamline review. Target December 2027 to release draft comprehensive objective development standards. See also Program HEI-1 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Units See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites Metric 3. Hold at least one meeting with State of California by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

1. The City will pursue a specific strategy tailored to each of the following types of publicly owned sites. c. City Owned Sites (Sites 23: Sanchez Art Center and Site 24: Sanchez Library): The City will conduct a “fit study” to determine the feasibility of future efforts at Sanchez Library and Sanchez Arts Center by June 2025 and subsequently examine if rezoning or redesignation would be appropriate for any publicly owned sites, in addition to any sites identified in HE-I-1. i. The City fit study will include commissioning a consultant to demonstrate feasibility to inform Council direction on preparation of SLA and other required processes. Staff will present a menu of options for potential development and any recommendations to the City Council by December 2025 ii. By December 2026, determine the process under the SLA by which the City will propose to transfer each site, which may include a declaration that a site is exempt under the SLA or that the City plans to issue a Notice of Availability to transfer a site. See also Program HE-I-1. iii. Develop project description and RFP process and solicit developers by December 2026 iv. Target Exclusive Negotiating Agreement by December 2027. v. Target land use entitlements issuance by December 2028 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Units See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites Metric 1. Fit study completed; recommendations brought to City Council. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

1. The City will pursue a specific strategy tailored to each of the following types of publicly owned sites. d. Corp Yard (Site 20): The City will continue to pursue a partnership with Pacifica School District to explore implementation requirements of an interagency partnership to use the City's current corporation yard for district offices, ideally including housing above, and consolidate City and Pacifica School District corporation yard functions at the existing Pacifica School District corporation yard at 375 Reina del Mar Avenue by December 2027. Council reviewed project concepts in 2022, and the Pacifica School District has expressed interest in pursuing and evaluating a test fit. i. By June 2025, hold a meeting with District representatives to discuss ways for the City to support the District in facilitating housing development on this site through aninteragency partnership. ii. Pursue development of an MOU or other vehicle to memorialize the purpose and approach of an interagency partnership by June 2026. iii. If a decision is made to pursue an interagency partnership on this site, work with District to develop a project description and RFP process targeted by June 2027. 6/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Units See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

2. By June 2025, the City will commission a study examining whether any other City-owned sites are appropriate for an RFP for a developer to work collaboratively with the City to try to develop a key site... (continues below) 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Other 1 See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites 2 (continued) ...and will present recommendations to the City Council by December 2025 with a goal of adoption by December 2026 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 Table D Page 5 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

3.ObjecƟves:a.City Owned Sites: The City will target a total of 182 low-income units.b.State-Owned Sites: (Caltrans and Skyline Water Tank): The City will target a total of 273 low-income units. c.School District Sites: The City will target a total of 307 Mixed-Income units, a minimum 15% of which would be affordable to low- and moderate-income levels consistent with the City’s BMR Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance. d.Corp Yard: The City will target a total of 39 low-income units. 6/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: See Status and Quantified Outcomes for Implementation Actions: HE-I-3.1.a, -3.1.b, -3.1.c, -3.1.d Note: The units listed in this objective are not reported in this row and are associated with Implementation Actions HE-I-3.1.a, -1.b, -1.c, -1.d.

Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites

4.Implementation to begin by December 2023 and require significant effort through December 2027. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-3: Master Planning and Implementation for Public Sites Metric 4. Determine if each property is exempt from SLA or begin compliance with SLA to transfer the property for the development of housing by December 2026. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-3.1 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-3.1 HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility To improve housing mobility and new housing choices in areas throughout the City, including through increasing the rate of ADU production to expand the number of units affordable to lowerincome households in higher resource areas across the city. Address constraints associated with land cost, construction cost, financing, and land use controls as they relate to the production of ADUs. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including land cost, General Plan compliance, parkingstandards, and other constraints to ADU production 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility By December 2026 (applies citywide except as noted): 1. Citywide ADU Programs to advance housing mobility:a. Provide technical ADU design tools and resources to homeowners to encourage ADU development, including pre-approved ADU plans (e.g., HEART) to increase the rate of production of affordable ADUs beyond the number developed over the previous planning period. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress and Partially Completed:4.1.a: In Progress: The City makes a financial contribution to the ADU Resource Center of San Mateo County as a part of a shared services contract. Through this initiative the City launched an online ADU plans gallery in Q1 2025. The city has provided pre-design plans, prepared by a professional and ready to begin permitting available for purchase or free. The City will also accepts state and federal agency pre-approved plans for prefabricated designs that have been approved by the state or federal government. Adding pre-approved plans to the plans gallery has not started. An update was provided to Council on April 18, 2025.

Other ADU plans gallery - launched in 2025: https://pacifica.aduaccelerator.org/gallery HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.b. Evaluate developing a “building permit ready ADU” program and plans that have been preapproved by the Building Division and conform to the current building code and present a recommendation to the City Council. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Not Yet Started: See response for 4.1.a
Other None
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.c. Strengthen the ADU OneStop shop program to provide additional information and technical assistance to understand ADU regulations. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Completed: ADU Accelerator Program was launched, information was published t Other 1 ADU plans gallery - launched in 2025: https://pacifica.aduaccelerator.org/gallery HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.d. Collaborate with other jurisdictions to develop a regional forgivable loan program for homeowners to construct an ADU that is held affordable for extremely low-income households for a minimum term. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: Pacifica staff are participating in San Mateo County Affordable ADU W
Other 1 None
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.e. Annually identify and pursue funding applications (federal, state, local, nonprofit and private) to support the development of ADUs with low interest loans and/or grants and other incentives. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: Pacifica staff are participating in San Mateo County Affordable ADU W
Other 1 None
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.f. Study and bring suggestions to City Council to revise development standards for ADUs to incentivize greater ADU production beyond the requirements in state law (including tuck-under parking, allowing multiple ADUs, increasing height limits, and reducing setbacks) 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Not Yet Started
Other None
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.g. The City shall maintain a list of existing ADUs within Pacifica to understand trends and issues in ADU development, maintenance, and habitation. The City shall revise its ADU application materials to request that property owners provide information on the anticipated use and rental rate for proposed ADUs and will use this information to track ADU uses and rents. This information shall be tracked beginning 2026 and continue throughout the planning period 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started
Not Yet Started
Other None
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.h. Apply for one grant to support rental assistance or other housing mobility programs by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City reviews and considers grant applications on an ongoing basis. The City engages the services of an external grant writer and grant opportunity manager. Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

1.i. To expand the production of ADUs and missing middle housing, create a publicly accessible land use and zoning GIS tool by December 2026 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: The City worked with a consultant on GIS development in 2024 and 2 Other None
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 7.b Launch GIS tool by December 2026. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City worked with a consultant on GIS development in 2024 and 2025. Work is ongoing. Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

2. To improve housing mobility and new housing choices in areas throughout the city, a suite of actions will be employed and targeted outside of the Housing Inventory sites, including targeting resources, outreach and other strategies in the highest-resource neighborhoods in R1 and other predominantly single family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave. with an overall goal of 85 housing opportunities affordable to lower income households in the planning period. Actions to be completed by December 2026 include:
12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of sub-tasks within this implementation action in the following rows.

Households See Supporting Documents of sub-tasks within this implementation action in the following row HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

2.a. Conduct proactive marketing to highest-resource neighborhoods in R1 and other predominantly single family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave. regarding regional ADU programs. Objective: 30 new ADUs in R1 and other predominantly single-family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave over the planning period, at least half of which are affordable to extremely low-, very low-, low-, or moderate-income households to improve residential mobility in lower density neighborhoods. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed
Completed: Proactive Marketing has occurred throughout 2025. Information about ADUs and Homesharing Programs were included with a Parks and Recreation brochure and was a recurring resource included in multiple editions of the City's online newsletter. Resources were also added to the City's website in 2025.

Units 1 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/community-development/accessory-dwelling- units Table D Page 6 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

2.b. By 2026 send or help coordinate a mailing to all households in the city at least once every two years advising them of the opportunity to create an ADU, the potential benefits of having an ADU, and potential incentives in the event the ADU is occupied by a household worker, caregiver, family member, or other household meeting the definition of a low or very low-income household 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

2.c. Participate in a home sharing program, such as HIP Housing’s Home Sharing Program, to improve housing opportunities for lower-income seniors and extremely low-income residents. A home sharing program matches persons needing housing with homeowners that have space in their homes. This program will increase residential mobility by providing access to homes in a community where every census tract is considered a high resource area. A shared housing program could prevent displacement of lower-income households, including lower-income seniors and persons with disabilities, that are in need of rental income or minor help with home repairs and maintenance in order to stay in their homes 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous
Continuous: The City participates in the program and provided education materials in City Newsletter regarding HIP Housing's homeshare program and provides links on the City's website. There was one new match made in 2025 and seven additional ongoing home sharing matches in Pacifica across four home providers. In addition, one Housing Readiness Program senior, who had previously resided in a homeless shelter was placed within the Pacific Oaks senior apartment complex with the assistance of a housing scholarship from HIP Housing.

Other 1 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/community-development/affordable-housing HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 3. Two home share placements per year. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: See status of HE-I-4.2,c Persons 1 None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

2.d. Objectives: (a) Develop an outreach program and connect with a home share program provider to expand participation in the program; (b) Connect 10 lower-income Pacifica residents with shared housing program participants; and, (c) Focus shared housing efforts on low-density neighborhoods, with an emphasis in R1 and other predominantly single family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave over the planning period all of which are considered high-income, high-resource areas. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

2.e. Accessibility Improvements: Research and pursue funding opportunities at least every other year to make accessibility improvements to homes and community infrastructure 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City reviews and considers grant applications on an ongoing basis. The City engages the services of an external grant writer and grant opportunity manager. Other 1 None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 7.a Apply for one grant in support of rental assistance or other housing mobility program by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: The City reviews and considers grant applications on an ongoing basis. The City engages the services of an external grant writer and grant opportunity manager. Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

3. Objective Design and Development Standards to facilitate missing middle housing in certain Low Density Residential Zones in accordance with SB9 to improve housing mobility in a variety of neighborhoods, including RCAAs. a. Develop Objective Design and Development Standards for two-lot subdivisions and two-unit developments to facilitate small multi-unit housing including in R1 and other predominantly single family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave by December 2028. This includes creating mixed residential neighborhoods through new and innovative housing types that meet the changing needs of Pacifica households and expand housing choices in a variety of neighborhoods. Housing types include, but are not limited to single dwelling units, multifamily dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, small and micro units, use of prefabricated homes, and clustered/cottage housing b. The implementation of Objective Design and Development Standards to facilitate the development of small multi-unit housing will occur in a variety of neighborhoods, including in R1 and other predominantly single-family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave 12/1/2028 6th Cycle In Progress
In progress: An update of SB9 Ordinance to bring ordinance into conformance with Coastal Commission requirements is in development. A consultant was engaged in November 2025 to continue advance implementation of citywide residential and mixed use Objective Design Standards. In addition, as a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development.

Other
Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/638996815953130000 Resolution Accepting Grant Award from the Partnership for the Bay’s Future Policy Fund: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1671&MediaPosition=&ID=5825&CssClass= HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 5. Adopt Objective Design and Development Standards for missing middle housing by December 2028. 12/1/2028 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-4.3. Other Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/638996815953130000 Resolution Accepting Grant Award from the Partnership for the Bay’s Future Policy Fund: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1671&MediaPosition=&ID=5825&CssClass= HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

4. Prioritize safety and accessibility mobility improvements included in the Bike/Ped Master Plan in the northern areas of the city. This includes finalizing the design and completing permitting of the ADA sidewalk improvements and bike lanes on Palmetto Avenue by December 2025 and construction by December 2026. (continues below)
12/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed
Completed: The Sharp Park ADA Pedestrian Improvement Project closed sidewalk gaps, improved sidewalks to current ADA standards, installed new ADA-compliant driveways and corner curb ramps in the six blocks around downtown area; the project bid closed in November 2024 and the notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025. The Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project was approved by Planning Commission and City Council in 2024, and installed new and improved existing Class 2 and Class 3 bike lanes along Palmetto Avenue, West Avalon Drive, and Esplanade Avenue. The project also enhanced pedestrian safety by installing quick-build painted bulbout safety zones at pedestrian crossings, curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at several intersections. The notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025.

Other 1
Project webpage (with photos): https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/public-works/engineering/esplanade-palmettobicyle-pedestrian-improvement-project HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 6. Finalize the design and complete permitting of the ADA compliant sidewalks and bike lanes on Palmetto Avenue by December 2025 and construction by December 2026. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HI-I-4.4. Other 1 Project webpage (with photos): https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/public-works/engineering/esplanade-palmettobicyle-pedestrian-improvement-project HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

4. (continued) Additionally, as part of the City’s Annual Resurfacing and Concreting Project, segments of Manor Drive and Hickey Blvd are scheduled for design and completion of permitting by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Final resurfacing improvements at Manor and Hickey is scheduled for Spring 2026. Other City of Pacifica 5-Year Work Plan FY 2025/26 to FY 2029/30 Street List https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/18504/6385723486730700 00 HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

5. By December 2025 and annually thereafter conduct proactive outreach to all known nonprofit higher education and religious institutions citywide and offer support for early development activities such as defining development opportunities possible on their sites and providing information on any applicable fees. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 8. Conduct outreach to at least two higher education and religious institutions per year starting in 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None Table D Page 7 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

6. By December 2026, adopt an ordinance to expand the feasibility of deed-restricted housing development on nonprofit higher education and religious institutions. a. The ordinance will include: ai. The density maximums for selected sites will be set based on an analysis of viable affordable housing prototypes. aii. Recommendations will also include densities appropriate for 100% affordable projects aiii. Associated impact fees for deed-restricted affordable housing on higher education and religious institution sites would also be waived aiv. Prioritization would be for R1 and other predominantly singlefamily residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave av. Zoning amendments and any necessary CEQA analysis are targeted to be complete by December 2026. b. Staff will also present recommendations to the Council regarding: Zoning amendments to allow up to 100 units on religious/institutional sites with a land use designation in the General Plan of Public and Semi-Public or Low Density Residential to augment other program changes required to achieve RHNA 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

7. By December 2025 conduct proactive outreach and offer to provide technical assistance to at least two manufactured housing park owners and/or resident groups regarding the Manufactured Housing Opportunity & Revitalization Program (MORE). An initial meeting with interested parties would be targeted to begin no later than June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: State funding for the MORE program is not currently available. Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

8. Improve access to affordable housing in the City’s high-opportunity neighborhoods and remove barriers to fair housing choice through implementation of program commitments: HE-I-1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.10-a, 1.10-b, 1-13, and 1-14. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress Partially Complete: See status of HE-I-1.1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.10-a, 1.10-b, 1-13, and 1-14. Other See Supporting Documents of Program HE-I-1.

HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

9. Mid-Cycle Review: A mid-cycle review of the status of progress toward expanding mobility will be completed in 2027 6/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility

10. Implementation to begin by January 2025 and require significant effort through December 2026 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 1. Process at least 25 ADU planning applications per year. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See APR Table A2 Other See APR Table A2 HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 2. Annual staff report presented to City Council housing mobility progress and progress toward advancing home share program goals stated above. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. This metric will be completed for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. See Table D of this APR. Meetings 1 See Table D of this APR. See also: Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 4. Annual APRs submitted. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. Implementing Action 1 will be complete for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. See Tables A, A-2, B, C, F of this APR.

Other 3 Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-4: Support for Development of Accessory Dwelling Units and Housing Mobility Metric 9. Increase the number of housing units supported, including the combination of small multiunit housing, religious institutions, ADUs, Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU), manufactured housing unit improvements through the MORE Program, implementation of the components of program HE-I-1 noted above, and SB 9 by 100 units (including 20 of these units as being affordable) over the eight year planning period with the further goal of at least 25 of the units in R1 and other predominantly single family residential districts southwest of Fassler Ave, or adjoining parcels designated in the General Plan as Public and Semi-Public. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress
Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. Implementing Action 1 will be complete for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. See Tables A, A-2, B, C, F of this APR.

Other Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund
Fund a Housing Action Fund to support housing projects or other supportive activities to remove constraints on housing production and promote development of multi-family rental and for-sale housing. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including land cost, park dedication fees, housing for persons with disabilities, and other planning and development fees. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund
Applies citywide except as noted:1. By June 2025, hire consultant to study best practices in establishing and funding a local housing fund using available funding sources and utilizing that fund to leverage new funding sources, including the Bay Area Housing Finance Authority (BAHC) and the Bay Area Preservation Pilot Fund (BAPP).Revenue options for further study include: Development Impact Fees, Linkage Fees, Vacancy Taxes, Grand Nexus Study in partnership with other local jurisdictions, other forms of land value capture to generate housing funds, exploring the market impacts of increasing the required BMR units from 15 percent to 20 percent minimum, short-term rental fees, general fund, the sale of surplus land, and transfer fees on luxury properties (e.g., 1.5% for property transactions greater than $2 million). 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: A joint Planning Commission and City Council study session was held on October 6, 2025, regarding updates to inclusionary housing ordinances and fees and density bonus ordinance. Update to in lieu fees is projected to provide additional revenue to the fund. The City of Pacifica is participating in the residential fee component of the 21 Elements Grand Nexus Study.

Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund Metric 1. Fund established; funding sources identified. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous and Partially Complete: The Housing Action Fund has been established. A contribution was made to the Housing Action Fund in 2025 from the San Mateo County Excess ERAF Distribution in the sum of $1,725,756.64. Additionally, In December, 2025 the City entitled a 19-unit development within the RCAA that included 2 lower income and 1 moderate income inclusionary units. In addition, the City approved a Development Agreement that requires an additional payment toward affordable housing in the amount of $272,000. See also status of HE-I5.1.

Other 1 Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund

2. By December 2025, explore other funding opportunities to support affordable housing development. Efforts include actively tracking available Federal, State, Regional, and Local funding opportunities for affordable housing and determining how to leverage these funds to build or rehabilitate more affordable housing. Actively coordinate with city partners, including nonprofit housing developers on how best to leverage these resources. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City reviews and considers grant applications on an ongoing basis. The City engages the services of an external grant writer and grant opportunity manager. Other 1 None HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund Metric 2. Staff to submit one funding application for outside funding per year, beginning in 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: See status of HE-I-5.2 Other None Table D Page 8 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund

3. By June 2025, identify funding to address limitations on staff capacity to implement the other implementation actions articulated in the Housing Element, including LEAP and REAP grants. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: As a result of the Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, the PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025. Other 1 Resolution Accepting Grant Award from the Partnership for the Bay’s Future Policy Fund: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1671&Me diaPosition=&ID=5825&CssClass= HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund

4. By June 2025, study the City’s participation in a shared housing capacity program being considered by the County of San Mateo County and other jurisdictions within San Mateo County. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: The City is participating in the shared capacity program and has contracted with HEART since February 2024. Other 1 None HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund

5. Establish extremely-low-income housing units, larger, lower income family units (3+ bedrooms), and units for people with disabilities including developmental disabilities as high priority investments for the housing fund.
12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund

6. Develop an annual strategy for the raising and disposition of funds. Staff to provide annual reports to the City Council. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund Metric 3. Develop annual strategy each year, produce annual reports each year. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-5: Fund a Housing Action Fund 7. Implementation to begin by January 2024 and require significant effort through December 2026 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other NoneHE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs Commission a study to evaluate revisions to current Below Market Rate (inclusionary zoning) program to increase the minimum required proportion of affordable units and incentivize production of units with deeper affordability than the current program. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including typical densities approved, and the inclusionary housing and density bonus ordinances 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs
By December 2025 (applies citywide except as noted):1. City will commission a study regarding an amendment to the City’s Below Market Rate (inclusionary) program ordinance. The Study will make detailed recommendations to the City Council and result in a draft revised ordinance and implementation guide. The study will make recommendations regarding the following: a. Require a minimum 20 percent affordable units in developments subject to the ordinance.b. Include best practices for additional incentives to encourage production of affordable units c. Include best practices for longer periods of affordability restrictions. d. Make recommendations to streamline the ordinance, ensure compliance with state law, and remove barriers to implementation. e. Include best practices research on prioritization of households with extremely low-incomes and special needs, including analysis of housing needs data and community outreach. f. Examine the feasibility of establishing priority allocation or establish a BMR unit set-aside for the following households in City-assisted and private development projects with BMR units: fi. Extremely low-income households (households earning less than 30% AMI). fii. People with developmental disabilities who receive services from the Golden Gate Regional Center. fiii. Units with three or more bedrooms to support large households 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: A joint Planning Commission and City Council study session was held on October 6, 2025, regarding updates to inclusionary housing ordinances and fees and density bonus ordinance. Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Ordinance update language is under development with support of HEART and is on track to be presented to Council in early 2026.The City of Pacifica is also participating in the residential feasibility component of the 21 Elements Grand Nexus Study. A consultant for the Grand Nexus Study was selected in August, 2025.

Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs
Metric 2. Increase utilization of the program in higher resource areas to at least one project by 2027 and a second project by the end of the planning period. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: In December, 2025 the City entitled a 19 unit development within the RCAA that included 2 lower income and 1 moderate income inclusionary units. In addition, the City approved a Development Agreement that requires an additional payment toward affordable housing in the amount of $272,000.

Other
Resolution No. 104-2025: APPROVING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION AND APPROVING SITEDEVELOPMENT PERMIT PSD-811-16, USE PERMIT UP-76-16, PARKING EXCEPTION PE183-19, SIGN PERMIT S-129-19, VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP SUB-233-16,AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TP-13-25 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MIXED-USECOMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PROJECT CONSISTING OF 3,165 SQUARE FEET OFCOMMERCIAL AREA AND 19 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUMS... https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/22075/639038171521970000Ordinance No. 905-C.S. TO... AMEND SECTION 9-4.1101(b) OF THEPACIFICA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD RESIDENTIAL USES IN HORIZONTALMIXED USE DEVELOPMENTS AS CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES IN THE C-2 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/22085/639039784513700000Ordinance 906-C.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVINGDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DA-4-24 TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE ADEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CRESPI BREAKWATER, LLC, AND THECITY OF PACIFICA.... https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/22087/6390397845239700 00 HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs

2. Adjust the City's Below Market Rate program to allow a smaller unit contribution (<15%), larger density bonuses, and/or other incentives in exchange for affordable units that address the needs of residents with disproportionate housing needs identified in HE-I-6.1.e and HE-I-6.1.f above. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: The City has contracted with HEART to provide inclusionary housing and density bonus ordinance update language that includes allowances for smaller or larger units, as well as other density bonus provisions. See also status of HE-I-6.1.

Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs Metric 1. Complete a study and adopt revisions to the Below Market Rate program by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-6.1 Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=TrueHE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs

3. Subsequent to an examination of feasibility, adjust the City’s Below Market Rate program to allow higher percentages of housing units for extremely low-income households (households earning less than 30% AMI) in exchange for additional flexibility to meet obligations through a combination of an inlieu fee and affordable unit contribution. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City is participating in the residential feasibility component of the 21 Elements Grand Nexus Study. The study will result in the information needed to make recommendations to the City Council regarding the approach described in this Implementation Action. A consultant for the Grand Nexus Study was selected in August, 2025.

Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs

4. Revise the BMR marketing requirement to ensure that BMR units in new developments are marketed to residents outside of the RCAA, for example, by marketing units in schools outside the RCAA to reach lower income families in need of affordable housing. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: The City has contracted with HEART to provide a BMR manual that will include a requirement that developments be marketed according to AFFH principles and outside the RCAA.

Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True Table D Page 9 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs Metric 3. Market all BMR units in new developments to potential residents outside the RCAA. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-6.4 Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=TrueHE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs

5. Strengthen the administration of the Below Market Rate program by creating written program guidelines and implementation procedures and seeking external program administration support (such as the shared housing capacity program described above in program HE-I-5.4) 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City has contracted with HEART to provide a BMR manual that will include written program guidelines and implementation procedures. Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs

6. Once the new ordinance is adopted, the City will develop an implementation guidebook that includes clear explanations for implementing the ordinance with example projects 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City has contracted with HEART to provide a BMR manual that will include clear explanations for implementation of the ordinance. Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs 7. Evaluate changes included within this program as potential constraints to development. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The feasibility study includes evaluation of changes included within this program as potential constraints to development. Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs
Metric 4. A report evaluating changes included within this program as potential constraints to development to be produced by December 2025 and updated to address additional constraints as necessary. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-6.7 Other Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-6: Strengthen Inclusionary Housing Programs 8. Implementation to begin by January 2024 and require significant effort through December 2025 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other NoneHE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units Preserve the city’s deed-restricted affordable units that will expire in the next decade and develop a plan forpreservation of all existing affordable units to keep them affordable long term. Protect residents of lessexpensive market-provided units. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described inAppendix G including land cost, construction cost, financing, and requests to develop at less than alloweddensities; it also indirectly addresses code enforcement constraints. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

1. To preserve housing units affordable to extremely low-income households, the City will develop an inventory of extremely low-income units in the city (units serving households that earn less than 30% AMI). Ensure ELI and special needs units are included in monitoring of affordable units. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City is developing and inventory of all known properties. Other None HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

2. In the event City receives Notice of Intent to convert to market rate housing, conduct tenant outreach and education. a. The City will conduct outreach to the property owner in order to understand the status of each property’s restrictions by December 2024. b. Provide noticing to tenants and affected public entities in accordance with Gov. Code, § 65863.10, 65863.11, and 65863.13. c. The City will respond promptly to any Notices of Intent to terminate affordability protections. d. If the City identifies units are at risk of converting to market rate, then the City will leverage available local resources by coordinating with San Mateo County Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART) and the County of San Mateo Department of Housing as well as work with its owner to pursue other financial resources (federal, state, local, nonprofit and private) to aid in the preservation of atrisk units 12/1/2024 6th Cycle Continuous
Continuous: The property owner of the City's deed-restricted below-market-rate units (one property containing 101 affordable units) has informed the City that it has completed a five year renewal agreement with HUD to preserve affordability of the units.

Other 1 None
HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units Metric 1. No loss of existing deed restricted affordable units in the planning period. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: No loss of existing deed restricted affordable units from 2023-2025. Other 1 None HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

3. Develop a long-term funding plan for preservation of at-risk units to keep them affordable long term by December 2024 12/1/2024 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: The property owner of the 101-unit property has informed the City that it has completed a five year renewal agreement with HUD to preserve affordability of the units.

Other None
HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

4. Consider revisions to land use policies necessary to ensure there is not an economic incentive to discontinue and redevelop affordable units at risk of conversion to market rate. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

5. Amend the Zoning Code to incorporate specific requirements stipulated in California Government Code Section 66300 pertaining to the replacement of protected housing units. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: This code amendment will be included in the Zoning Modernization project described in HE-I-2. Other See Supporting Documents of Program HE-I-2.

HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

6. Preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing by requiring replacement of Below Market Rate units lost during any construction, redevelopment, or demolition projects. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City complies with all state laws regarding replacement of units. Other 1 None HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

7. Pursue HEART program to fund acquisition and preservation of existing rental units to preserve as affordable housing. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units

8. Evaluate policies to prevent the conversion of existing affordable housing units to less affordable housing types. For example, by supporting the preservation and habitability of mobile home communities, or programs to facilitate the donation of private homes to affordable housing programs 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units
Metric 2. No net loss of affordable housing units following any construction, redevelopment or demolition projects resulting in the removal of affordable housing units. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: No loss of affordable housing units following any construction, redevelopment or demolition projects resulting in the removal of affordable housing units occurred in 2023, 2024, or 2025.

Other 1 None
HE-I-7: Preserve Existing Affordable Housing Units 9. Implementation to begin by January 2024 and will require significant effort through December 2026 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas Support maintenance and rehabilitation activities that improve the condition of the city’s existing housing stock in order to preserve existing housing options, especially for extremely low-income households and households with special needs. Address any building code constraints to facilitate preservation of existing housing stock. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including the LocalCoastal Plan, code enforcement, and the California Coastal Act constraints. It also directly addresses land cost and construction cost constraints. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

1. The City will add home maintenance education resources to its website by 2024. 12/1/2024 6th Cycle In Progress In progress: Website additions are in progress. HEART was contracted in 2025 to develop updated website materials. Draft materials have been developed. Other None HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

2. The City will conduct a survey to ascertain the housing conditions and rehabilitation or accessibility needs for existing homeowners and properties located in low resource areas by 2027. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None Table D Page 10 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

3. Pursue opportunities to create repair and rehabilitation programs to address housing units in need of repair in low-resource areas by 2026. Funding sources may include local, regional, and/or state funds. Examples may include: a. Minor home repair program that will provide life safety and accessibility repairs to low-income seniors and disabled homeowners at no cost b. Loan program or microgrant to aid in the repair or rehabilitation of homes owned or occupied by extremely low-income households
12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

4. While resources will be added to the website by 2024 (HE-I-8.1), analysis and program implementation to begin by January 2025 and require significant effort through December 2027 (HE-I8.2 and HE-I-8.3) [Correction: the referenced program numbers have been corrected. The were previously listed incorrectly as "HE-1.1, HE-I-2, and HE-I-3"] 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress
In progress: Website additions are in progress. HEART was contracted in 2025 to develop updated website materials. Draft materials have been developed. Not started: HE-I-8.2 and HE-I-8.3[Correction: the referenced program numbers have been corrected. The were previously listed incorrectly as "HE-I-1, HE-I-2, and HE-I-3"] Other None
HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

5. Staff will initiate a proactive property identification program by December 2026: a. Code enforcement staff to identify properties in need of significant maintenance – prior to receipt of a complaint and initiation of enforcement activity – to ascertain with property owners and occupants any underlying reasons for the degraded property condition, and connection with available local, state, and federal resources that can assist with property rehabilitation. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas Metric 1. Beginning in 2027, a minimum of two properties per year have participated in the proactive property identification program. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

6. Staff will initiate a coastal housing preservation program by December 2026:a. The City will update its operating procedures including all applicable forms to require as an application submittal requirement information about the income levels of building occupants prior to issuance of any permit to authorize demolition or conversion of a dwelling unit to a nonresidential use within the Coastal Zone. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-8: Rehabilitation of Homes in Lower Resource and Coastal Areas

7. Completion of Program: HE-I-4.7 (support for manufactured housing park owners and/or resident groups). See also Program HE-I-4 for associated metrics. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: State funding for the MORE program is not currently available. Other None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

Through the implementation actions listed below, the City will prioritize a mix of unit sizes at inclusive housing properties that would address the needs of those who require live-in aides, want to live with roommates or partners, or have children. The City will also encourage development near public transit to accommodate the transit-dependency of most adults with developmental disabilities 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

1.When available, the City will offer financial incentives or regulatory concessions to encourage a variety of housing types to meet the needs of extremely low-income households and households with disproportionate housing needs. By June 2026 and ongoing (applies citywide except as noted): 1. For any projects that include extremely low-income units or housing for special needs populations with an emphasis on housing for extremely low-income households and people with disabilities including developmental disabilities, homeless individuals and farmworkers, the City will complete evaluation of the following incentives: a. Implement a streamlined review process to expedite development review. Develop a streamlined checklist to facilitate expedited application processing. b. Grant fee deferrals or waivers. c. Allow exceptions to development standards and grant concessions. d. For any projects that include a city-incentive or public subsidy, prioritize project proposals that provide the most units for populations with disproportionate housing needs (i.e., include evaluation criteria that grant more points for these projects) e. Provide additional local density bonus, above the State Density Bonus Law. f. Reduce or remove parking requirements whenever feasible 6/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress and Not Yet Started:In Progress: HE-I-9.1.a: A consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development. Not Yet Started: HE-I-9.1.b to HE-I-9.1.f: The City follows the requirements and processes provided in State law.

Other
Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/6389968159531300 00 HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

2. Provide additional local density bonus, incentives, and/or concessions for housing projects that include a minimum number of units for people at the Extremely Low-Income affordability level (e.g., 5% of total units, to be confirmed by economic study) 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

Metric 3. Determine if further study is needed regarding additional density bonus for projects with an ELI component by December 2027. See also metrics associated with Program HE-I-4. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

3. Target city-owned land, land dedicated to affordable housing and city housing funds to achieve cityspecific priorities such as a percentage of the units subject to a preference for people with extremely low incomes or special housing needs. The City will prioritize city-owned land and other resources to support development projects that maximize units suitable for the following special needs groups: a. Extremely low-income households (households earning less than 30% AMI) b. People with developmental disabilities who receive services from the Golden Gate Regional Center c. Homeless individuals d. Farmworkers
12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of Program HE-I-3. Other See Supporting Documents of Program HE-I-3.

HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

4. The City will annually identify and pursue funding applications (federal, state, nonprofit and private) to support the development of housing units for extremely low-income households or households with disproportionate housing needs. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City reviews and considers grant applications on an ongoing basis. The City engages the services of an external grant writer and grant opportunity manager. Other 1 None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

5. On an ongoing basis and at least annually, the City will provide outreach and coordination with affordable housing developers to support the development of units for extremely low-income households or households with disproportionate housing needs. For example,the City can conduct outreach to neighborhood groups, stakeholders, advocates, and local businesses regarding the advantages of providing opportunities for new construction and preservation of SingleRoom-Occupancy (SROs) as a source of housing for extremely low-income households 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None Table D Page 11 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

6. To address unmet need for supportive housing and services the City will conduct additional outreach to better understand community needs, analyze existing regulations around small-size facilities, interview key intermediaries, and identify if there are licensing or other barriers that could be lowered. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

7. The City will prioritize the incentives above to support sites for development of extremely lowincome housing in the RCAA and in R1 and other predominantly single-family residential districts southwest of Fassler as well as adjacent to those areas to increase access to opportunity for extremely low-income residents in higher resource areas.
12/1/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

Metric 1. Number of housing units built to accommodate residents with disproportionate housing needs and extremely low-income households during the planning period. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. Implementing Action 1 will be complete for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. See Tables A, A-2, B, C, F of this APR.

Other 1 See Tables A, A-2, B, C, F of this APR. See also: Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

Metric 2. Beginning in 2026 project processing times for development projects will be monitored and a report completed every two years. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-9: Housing for Extremely Low-Income, Special, and Disproportionate Needs:

8. Implementation to begin by January 2026 and subsequently will require significant ongoing effort 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness Support social services for homeless residents and homeless prevention and work with homeless service providers to prioritize legal help, housing assistance, and other social services for unhoused families. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including constraintsassociated with zoning, parking standards, zoning for a variety of housing types, emergency shelters, andprocessing and permitting procedures, including regarding findings, exemption from standards, and allowancesfor residential uses in commercial districts. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness Beginning in 2025, then ongoing:1. The City shall support nonprofits that offer housing solutions and services for the homeless. The City shall support with staff expertise and funding, as available, nonprofit organizations that offer solutions to solving homelessness and/or provide housing related services for the homeless or at-risk homeless. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous
Continuous: The City extended the term and expanded the number of individuals served through the Temporary Safe Parking Program. The City’s funding contribution to the Program totals $412,000 (“Funding Obligation”). $204,000 of this will be for rental of ten parking spaces in SFRV, to be paid directly from the City to SFRV. $208,000 of this Funding Obligation will be for PRC’s continuing operations and case management services, to be paid from the City to PRC.

Other 1
CC Reso 44-2025: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/20553/638864505428800000 HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness

2. The City shall continue its participation in HOPE (Housing Our People Effectively). The City shall be an active participant in HOPE and support its efforts to address the needs of Pacifica’s homeless residents by attending at least three-quarters of all meetings during a calendar year 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Completed
Completed: City Councilmembers participated in and attended meetings of the HOPE Interagency Council throughout 2025. The HOPE Interagency Council was dissolved by the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors on October 21, 2025.

Other 1
Dissolution Resolution and Staff Report: https://sanmateocounty.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=7707861&GUID=2C7C20DE4C17-4EDF-B6C4-9552DA4DFF82&Options=&Search=Meeting minutes: https://www.smcgov.org/hsa/san-mateo-county-hope-interagencycouncil HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness

3. The City shall provide referrals to the Pacifica Resource Center helping families with social services for housing and homeless prevention 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City provides referrals on an ongoing basis. Other 1 None HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness

4. The City shall provide referrals to veterans and their immediate families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Resources for referrals include the Veteran’s Affairs (VA) National Call Center of Homeless Veterans at 1-877-4AID-VET and to the HUD-VASH program thatis a joint effort between the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the VA Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) Program to move veterans and their families out of homelessness and into permanent housing through a voucher program that allows homeless veterans to rent privately owned housing 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City provides referrals on an ongoing basis. Other 1 None HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness

5. Evaluate the capacity for development of one year-round emergency shelter for homeless individuals within a zoning district that permits the emergency shelter use to ensure the zoning district(s) can meet the need established by the 2022 San Mateo County Point In Time County. Evaluation will be completed within one year of Housing Element adoption. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness

6. Prepare an update to Section 9-4.2818 of the Pacifica Municipal Code to modify the parking standard for Emergency Shelters to be consistent with AB 139, which shall be revised to state the following, “One (1) space per staff member (including employees or volunteers) on duty when the shelter is open to individuals utilizing the emergency shelter or parking to accommodate all staff working in the emergency shelter, provided that the standards do not require more parking for emergency shelters than other residential or commercial uses within the same zone.” 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Completed
Completed: Section 9-4.2818 of the Pacifica Municipal Code was modified as follows: "One (1) space per employee or volunteer on duty when the shelter is open to individuals utilizing the emergency shelter." The Ordinance was adopted December 11, 2023.

Other 1
Ord 894-C.S. Emergency Shelter Ordinance that updated parking requirementhttps://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/16746/638379713410300000 HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness Reduce the San Mateo County Point in Time homeless count in Pacifica by 10 percent over the planning period. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The San Mateo County Point in Time Count for the City of Pacifica was 161 in 2022 and 180 in 2024, a 12% increase. Another count is planned for 2026. The 2024 Point in Time Count showed a 5% increase in unsheltered homelessness between 2022 and 2024 in San Mateo County overall and 5% increase in Coastal San Mateo County as well.

Other San Mateo County 2024 Point in Time Count: https://www.smcgov.org/media/149456/download?inline= HE-I-10: Strengthen Services for People At-Risk of Experiencing Homelessness

7. Implementation to begin by January 2025 and subsequently require significant ongoing effort. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

Maintain and distribute accurate information about fair housing law and policies and regulate existing loopholes related to substantial remodels. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including transitional and supportive housing, special care facilities, housing for persons withdisabilities, the definition of family, and code enforcement 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

By June 2025 and ongoing (applies citywide except as noted):1. Identify inconsistencies between fair housing laws and the Zoning Code and include consistency with fair housing laws in the Zoning Code Update (program HE-I-2) by June 2025 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: This work is included in the Zoning Modernization project described in HE-I- 2. Other See Supporting Documents of Program HE-I-2.

Table D Page 12 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

2. Partner with local fair housing organization to complete a study session with City Council on fair housing laws by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: A joint Planning Commission and City Council study session was held on October 6, 2025, regarding updates to inclusionary housing ordinances and fees and density bonus ordinance. Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Ordinance update language is under development with support of HEART and is on track to be presented to Council in early 2026.

Other 1 Study Session Staff Report: https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1608&Inline=True HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

3. The City shall support nonprofits providing legal counseling and advocacy concerning fair housing laws, rights, and remedies to those who believe they have been discriminated against by referring persons requesting information or assistance related to housing discrimination to one or more fair housing groups for legal services annually and on an ongoing basis 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The City provides referrals on an ongoing basis. Other None HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

4. Brochures providing information on fair housing and tenants’ rights will be available at City Hall, public libraries and on the City’s website. The brochures will also be available at nonprofit organizations serving low-income residents. The brochures will be available in multiple languages by June 2025 and ongoing
6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: City plans to initiate this work in 2026. Other None HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

5. As funding allows, the City shall provide annual funding assistance to organizations that provide fair housing, tenant/landlord, and habitability counseling and other general housing assistance by June 2025 annually and ongoing.
6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

Metric 1. Amount of funding provided to support renter advocacy and number of referrals to advocacy organizations. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: See status of HE-I-11.5 Other None HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

6. Adopt an ordinance requiring that a building permit is required be issued, if otherwise required under state and local law, as a prerequisite to serving a substantial renovation eviction notice consistent with Government Code Section 1946.2(b)(2)(D)(iv)(III) by June 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: This Implementation Action is no longer applicable as substantial renovation is now addressed through state law. Other None HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

Metric 2. Adoption of an ordinance requiring that a building permit is required be issued, if otherwise required under state and local law, as a prerequisite to serving a substantial renovation eviction notice consistent with Government Code Section 1946.2(b)(2)(D)(iv)(III)by June 2025. See also metrics associated with Program HE-I-4. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-11.6. Other None HE-I-11: Support Fair Housing Enforcement and Outreach Capacity:

7. Implementation to begin by January 2025 and subsequently will require significant ongoing effort 1/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

To support and engage in efforts to educate community stakeholders and residents, in particular those with special needs (such as farmworkers, people with disabilities including those with developmental disabilities, single-female head of households, and cost burdened households, and unhoused people--including the vehicle-housed), about housing gaps and the effects of programs and policies on addressing those gaps. Proactively create opportunities for all communities to have a voice and be involved in shaping policies and programs. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including employee and farmworker housing, housing for persons with disabilities, the definition of family, and code enforcement. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

1. Research other cities and best practices to create an affirmative marketing strategy for Fair Housing information and resources by June 2024. 6/1/2024 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: The City has contracted with HEART of San Mateo County to develop draft materials. Work began in 2025 and work on this item is included within the 2026 workplan for HEART's work in Pacifica.

Other None
HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

2. Partner with local fair housing organization to provide training on an annual basis for landlords and tenants at least annually by June 2024, and ongoing. a. Support the training curriculum offered by nonprofit partners to increase knowledge about fair housing laws and reasonable accommodation requirement and provide information to landlords on fair housing laws and reasonable accommodation by December 2024.b. Promote training sessions in areas identified as lower resource areas. c. Ensure training is available in multiple languages and promote training sessions by including the information on the city’s website. 12/1/2024 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: The City has contracted with HEART of San Mateo County to implement this Implementation Action. Work began in 2025 and work on this item is included within the 2026 workplan for HEART's work in Pacifica.

Other None
HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

Metric 3. Partners to have conducted at least two fair housing trainings per year by December 2025 and each year following. 12/1/2024 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-12.2 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-12.2.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

3. Conduct the following proactive outreach by June 2025 and on an annual basis: a. Conduct proactive outreach about fair housing issues (i.e., explain the right to request reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities), with residents and other stakeholders. Outreach will be conducted at least annually during the planning period and may include sharing information via newsletters, email communication, events, or social media. b. Continue to inform realtors, builders, City staff, and the community at large about fair housing law and policies, through information posted on city’s website and handouts available at City Hall, Library, the Senior Center and other city facilities (ongoing). c. Continue to participate in Countywide (and other) efforts to share best practices on equitable engagement and inclusive outreach. (e.g., Home For All “Learning Network”) d. Include Spanish marketing materials and ensure bilingual interpretation services are available. Other languages may also be included in some instances.
6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-12.2 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-12.2.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

Metric 2. Increase the number of educational and public engagement opportunities available to Pacifica residents about fair housing issues and affordable housing opportunities. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-12.2 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-12.2.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

4. Complete the following website updates by June 2025:
a. Add information on the City’s website to clearly define reasonable accommodation in housing in accordance with state fair housing law. b. Modify the City’s webpage to include more information about reasonable accommodation. c. The City shall ensure that its website and handout materials regarding housing resources, requirements, and services for persons with disabilities are updated annually and made available to the public d. Update the City’s website to include a robust fair housing section that is consistent with best practices 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In progress: Affordable housing page update is in progress with support from HEART with anticipated launch in early 2026. See status of HE-I-12.1. Other None HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

Metric 4. Modify the city’s webpage to include more information about reasonable accommodation by December 2025. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: See status of HE-I-12.4 Other None Table D Page 13 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

5. Proactively Market Available Housing Opportunities to Residents with Disproportionate Housing Needs (such as farmworkers, people with disabilities including those with developmental disability, single-female head of households, and unhoused people--including the vehicle-housed) by June 2025 and ongoing. a. Market available affordable units to lower income households by developing standard City-required marketing activities by housing developers for new or available BMR or low-income units. b. Include extremely low-income households, farm workers, people with disabilities, and households with disproportionate housing needs, and unhoused people--including the vehicle-housed, as new target group for marketing new affordable units where appropriate. c. Add schools outside the RCAA to the required recipient list for application solicitations to increase the chances of people and especially families with children outside the RCAA to learn about affordable housing opportunities within the RCAA. d. Partner with community intermediaries such as schools and churches to conduct outreach activities in multiple languages, including activities with a significant representation of hard-to-reach communities such as extremely low-income households. The City will conduct outreach and education on a project- by-project basis and will ensure that programs target/affirmatively market to lowerincome households outside of the RCAA. e. Include Spanish marketing materials and ensure bilingual interpretation services are available. Other languages may also be included in some instances.
6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

Metric 1. Proactively Market affordable housing opportunities and available housing opportunities to residents with disproportionate housing needs in partnership with community intermediaries at least two times per year. 6/1/2025 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

6. Identify any existing service providers along the Coastside that support farmworker housing needs to gain greater insight into potential farmworker housing needs in Pacifica. Work cooperatively with local growers, agriculture-related businesses (such as packing and distribution facilities), the farm bureau, and advocates for farmworkers such as the California Rural Legal Assistance (CRLA) in order to determine availableresources and shortfalls. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

7. Increase educational outreach efforts on fair housing issues related to frequent housing discrimination faced by farmworkers due to their ethnicity and type of employment, landlord/tenant issues and the Employee Housing Act related to farm laborers, farm labor contractors and agricultural employers. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started Other None HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

8. Revise provisions for Granting Reasonable Accommodation by June 2026. Article 51, Reasonable Accommodation requests under PMC Title 9, Chapter 4 are required to include documentation of the specific accommodation request, property/applicant details, and the necessity of the accommodation to ensure equal opportunity to use and enjoy the residence. The City will revise Article 51 to remove or significantly change potentially subjective finding no. 3 regarding “architectural compatibility.” The City will also revise finding no. 4 to objectively define “undue financial or administrative burden” (e.g. would not result in obstructing other members’ of the public’s use of any public spaces and would not present greater than 1% of the City’s associated program or project budget). The City will also revise finding no. 7 to provide more objective criteria for when a use would adversely affect health or safety or be injurious toproperty or improvements. 6/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: Implementation of this action is being addressed as part of HE-I-2.1 Comprehensive Zoning Regulation modernization. See status of HE-I-2.1.

9. Completion of additional housing mobility marketing actions included in program HE- I-1.10, -1.13, and -1.14. [Correction: the referenced program numbers have been corrected. They were previously listed incorrectly as" HE-I-4.10, -4.13, and - 4.15"] 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Completed
Completed: See status of HE-I-1.10, -1.13, and -1.14. [Correction: the referenced program numbers have been corrected. They were previously listed incorrectly as" HE-I-4.10, -4.13, and - 4.15"] Other 1 See Supporting Documents of HE-I-1.10, -1.13, and -1.14.

HE-I-12: Fair Housing Affirmative Marketing Strategy:

10. Implementation to begin by January 2024 and subsequently requires significant ongoing effort. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements
Ensure adequate utilities, transportation and other infrastructure to accommodate future housing needs andaddress any infrastructure constraints to make the production of housing more likely. Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including general plan consistency, multi-familyhousing, and infrastructure constraints, including those associated with the Coast Highway, water, and wastewater. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements

1. Include projects in the city's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and in other long-term improvement plans, initiatives to eliminate infrastructure capacity constraints (such as the approved and funded replacement and rehabilitation (R&R) projects in the Vallemar and Rockaway Beach neighborhoods scheduled to begin by July 2025 (Vallemar) and July 2026 (Rockaway Beach))that may limit housing production, by December 2027. City will begin construction on CIP projects listed above by July 2026 (Vallemar) and July 2027 (Rockaway Beach). 7/1/2026 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: In Progress: The Vallemar and Rockaway Beach Areas Sewer Rehabilitation and Repair Project combined these projects, and is included in the City's 5-Year CIP. Design started in 2024 and Environmental Review is in progress. Construction is scheduled to begin in Q3 2026 and anticipated to last 2 years. The construction timeframe has changed due to delay with the Water Infrastructure Financing and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan.

Other City of Pacifica CIP webpage: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/public-works/capit HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements Metric 1. Identified infrastructure needs are accounted for in adopted plans. 7/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-13.1 Other 1 See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-13.1.

HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements
Metric 2. Construction of replacement and rehabilitation (R&R) projects in the Vallemar and Rockaway Beach neighborhoods to begin by July 2026 (Vallemar) and July 2027 (Rockaway Beach). 7/1/2026 6th Cycle Not Yet Started Not Yet Started: See status of HE-I-13.1 Other See Supporting Documents of Implementation Action HE-I-13.1.

Table D Page 14 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements

2. Explore the feasibility of expanding transportation services generally, and in particular for focused services for seniors, people with disabilities, and lower-income residents. Strengthen transportation networks that connect residents with services and economic opportunities, including through partnerships with transportation agencies. a. Support improvements to public transit routes, services and facilities to facilitate longer distance travel. Activities would include encouraging SamTrans to improve service coverage, frequency, and operating hours in these areas, in part by helping the agency better understand where this special needs population is located in Pacifica. b. Commit the City’s representatives on the regional Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG) boards and committees to actively advocate for transportation and transit planning improvements in Pacifica.c. Continue capital investments in sidewalk and bike lane projects with priority in the identified areas of need to improve mobility and access to employment opportunities. d. The City will encourage development of housing for seniors, people with disabilities, and lowerincome residents near public transit and areas with amenities. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle Continuous
Continuous and Partially Completed: Continuous: HE-I-13.2.a, 13.2.b, 13.2.d: The City continues to prioritize expansion of transportation focused services for seniors, people with disabilities, and lower-income residents.Completed: HE-I-13.2.c: The Sharp Park ADA Pedestrian Improvement Project closed sidewalk gaps, improved sidewalks to current ADA standards, installed new ADAcompliant driveways and corner curb ramps in the six blocks around downtown area; the project bid closed in November 2024 and the notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025. The Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project was approved by Planning Commission and City Council in 2024, and installed new and improved existing Class 2 and Class 3 bike lanes along Palmetto Avenue, West Avalon Drive, and Esplanade Avenue. The project also enhanced pedestrian safety by installing quick-build painted bulbout safety zones at pedestrian crossings, curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at several intersections. The notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025.

Other 1
Project webpage (with photos): https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/public-works/engineering/esplanade-palmettobicyle-pedestrian-improvement-project HE-I-13: Infrastructure Capacity Improvements 3. Implementation to begin by January 2025 and require significant effort through December 2027. 12/1/2027 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other NoneHE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance Amend the zoning ordinance and other local policies to remove any inconsistencies between local policies andState and Federal law.Specifically, this program is designed to address constraints described in Appendix G including the LocalCoastal Program, parking standards, multi-family housing, accessory dwelling units, transitional and supportivehousing, employee and farmworker housing, emergency shelters, low barrier navigation centers, SB 9, SB 35,and processing and permitting procedures. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle In Progress This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for status and details of each objective within this program. Other This row is for the overall program. See subsequent rows for supporting documents related to each objective within this program.

HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance
Annually, beginning in 2023, and ongoing unless otherwise indicated below:1. Monitor housing production against ABAG Fair Share Allocation, including regarding no net loss compliance, during planning period, and provide an annual report on housing production to the City Council each year, prior to submittal of the Annual Progress Report to HCD and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) by April 1st of each year. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. Implementing Action 1 will be complete for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. Other 3 Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance Metric 2. Annual APRs submitted. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: The 2024 APR was submitted in 2025. Implementing Action 1 will be complete for 2025 with submittal of the 2025 APR and ongoing annually. Other 3 Annual Progress Reports - Data Dashboard: https://www.hcd.ca.gov/housing-open-data-tools/apr-dashboard HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

2. Review, and where appropriate amend, the Zoning Code to establish a By-Right designation for housing sites reused from prior Housing Element for housing projects that propose a minimum of 20 percent affordable units, where appropriate, by December 2026. 12/1/2026 6th Cycle Completed Completed: See status of HE-I-1.1 Other 1 See Supporting Documents of HE-I-1.1 HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

3. Amend Zoning Regulations to adopt an ordinance and administrative procedures implementing SB 9 by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: While the City has not yet adopted an SB 9 ordinance, applications are processed in compliance with SB 9. The Planning division has administrative internal procedures that are in compliance with state law and consistent with SB 9. Council has adopted interim guidelines in compliance with state law (Resolution 11-2022). Draft AB 9 Ordinance is being further revised to reflect additional updates to state law (e.g. AB 684).

Other Interim SB 9 Resolution: https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/950/637830223150630000 HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

4. Amend Zoning Regulations to adopt an ordinance and administrative procedures implementing SB 35 by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle Completed Completed: Applications are processed in compliance with SB 35, and staff determined that an implementing ordinance was not necessary to process applications in conformance with state law. The Planning division has administrative internal procedures that are in compliance with state law and consistent with SB 35.

Other 1 None
HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

5. Amend Zoning Regulations to define employee housing (farmworker housing) and regulate the use in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 17021.5, 17021.6 and 17021.8, which precludes a local government from requiring a conditional use permit, zoning variance, and/or other zoning clearance for certain employee housing, including agricultural employee housing, by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

Other
Scope of work for consultant services is Resolution # 100-25 https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/21737/638996815953130000 Resolution to Accept the PBF Policy Fund Grant Award https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?Frame=&MeetingID=1671&MediaPosition=&ID=5825&CssClass= HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

6. Amend Zoning Regulations to define Transitional and Supportive Housing and regulate the use(s) in accordance with Government Code Section 65651 and 65583(c)(3) by December 2025. Updates shall ensure: Transitional housing and supportive housing shall be considered a residential use of property and shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Supportive housing, as defined in Section 65650, shall be a use by right in all zones where multifamily and mixed uses are permitted, as provided in Article 11 (commencing with Section 65650). 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

7. Amend Zoning Regulations to define Low Barrier Navigation Centers in accordance with Government Code Section 65660 and regulate the use in compliance with Government Code Sections 65662 through 65666 by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

8. Amend Zoning Regulations to define Emergency Shelter and identify one or more zoning designations that allow residential uses, including mixed uses, where they will be allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit and that are suitable for residential uses in compliance with Government Code Section 65583(a)(4)(A) through (J) by December 2023. To implement this, Ordinance No. 894-C.S. was adopted on December 11, 2023, and is effective for areas outside the coastal zone on January 10, 2024. 12/1/2023 6th Cycle Completed Completed: Supplementary information: additional areas inside Coastal Zone are anticipated to be reviewed by the Coastal Commission in 2026. Other 1 Ordinance No. 894-C.S.

Table D Page 15 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan 1 2 345 6 7 8 9
Name of Program Objective
Projected Completion
Date in Housing
Element
Applicable Cycle Status of Program Implementation Program Implementation Details Quantified Outcomes: Category Quantified Outcomes: Count Supporting Documents Housing Programs Progress Report
HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

9. Review, and if appropriate amend, Zoning Code to implement AB 2162 and allow by-right 100 percent affordable housing that has 25 percent or 12 units of permanent supportive housing, where multi-family or mixed-use housing is permitted by December 2025. 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

10. Distribute the certified Housing Element to local water and other utility providers and encourage them to grant service priority/allocations to developments that contain units affordable to persons with lower incomes by December 2024. 12/1/2024 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Draft correspondence has been prepared and is under review. Other None HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

11. Allow group homes for seven or more residents, specifically for people with disabilities, as a permitted use in all zoning districts allowing residential uses by December 2025. Amend the Zoning Code to remove the 500-foot spacing requirement and apply the same types of zoning standards to group homes with seven or more persons as would apply to other similar housing types in the same zoning district. The amended zoning code will expand beyond recent updates to the zoning code to clarify that seven or more individuals as described above living in a home would be a permitted use and not by itself be cause for application to the City for a use permit or license. Where applicable state and federal regulations may still apply. a. The definition of family will be revised by December 2025 to conform with contemporary best practice, including clarification that family be defined as, “family or single housekeeping unit.” 12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

12. Consider requiring replacement of existing affordable units in conformance with Government Code Section 65583.2(g)(3). 1/1/2023 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

13. Update the Zoning Code to ensure Pacifica’s ADU Ordinance conforms to state law. Following a review of Pacifica’s ADU Ordinance, HCD provided a list of ADU non-compliance issues which included the definition of site, minimum landscaping requirements, parking, and subjective standards, among others. Complete ADU Ordinance update by December 2024. 12/1/2024 6th Cycle In Progress In progress: Contract in place with implementing partner: ADU resource center. ADU applications are reviewed in accordance with applicable state and local laws. Other ADU Resource Center information showing Pacifica as a member jurisdiction: https://smcadu.org/about/ HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance

14. Single-Room-Occupancy (SRO) is not specifically identified as a separate allowed use in the Pacifica Municipal Code but is conditionally permitted as “Boardinghouse” as a conditional use subject to approval of a use permit in the R-3, R-3, R-3-G, and R-5 zoning districts. Boardinghouse is currently defined as “a dwelling other than a hotel where lodging and meals for five (5) or more persons are provided for compensation.” In addition, SROs applications in the R-3 zoning district are treated as an allowed use. a. By December, 2025 amend the zoning and building code to facilitate and encourage new SRO construction. This would include adding a definition and use of “Single-Room Occupancy” and the identification of at least the R-3 zoning district where SROs will be permitted, as consistent with state law. This action will strengthen the viability of SRO buildings as an essential source of housing for extremely low-income households including farmworkers.
12/1/2025 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: As a result of a Partnership for the Bay's Future grant awarded in 2024, a PBF Fellow initiated work in 2025 to conduct analysis on existing zoning regulations regarding housing development, including review procedures.In addition, a consultant was engaged in November 2025 to conduct additional analysis on existing zoning regulations and review procedures regarding housing development.

15. Ensure compliance with the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for the Environs of San Francisco International Airport (November 2012) (“SFO ALUCP”), including but not limited to the following actions: a. Refer all new or amended general plan elements, specific plans, zoning ordinances, or building regulations affecting the development potential of land within the boundary of the SFO ALUCP to the San Mateo County Airport Land Use Commission for review prior to adoption. b. Refer all proposed development projects on sites within the boundary of the SFO ALUCP to the San Mateo County Airport Land Use Commission for review prior to approval, when applicable. c. Projects applications shall not be approved unless they comply with the following measures, where required the zoning code shall be amended to ensure consistency. These include all Airspace Protection Policies contained in the SFO ALUCP and all noise compatibility criteria and related implementation measures, including but not limited to the Noise/Land Use Compatibility Criteria and related mitigation measures contained in SFO ALUCP Table IV-1. 1/1/2023 6th Cycle In Progress
In Progress: The ALUC determined the City of Pacifica to be conditionally consistent with ALUCP requirements pending adoption of the revised Housing Element (C/CAG-ALUC Resolution 23-68). The revised Housing Element was adopted on March 24, 2025, and formally certified by HCD. The City has requested additional guidance from ALUC staff regarding any additional required review.

Other
Minutes of July 13, 2023 ALUC and C/CAG meeting showing adoption of Resolution 23-68: https://ccag.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/091423-CCAG-Board-Minutes-Julyfinal.pdf HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance
Metric 1. Annual staff report presented to City Council on state and federal policy changes and recommended code updates. 12/1/2031 6th Cycle Continuous Continuous: A report was made to the City Council in 2025 Other 1 None HE-I-14: State and Federal Law Conformance 16. Implementation to begin by December 2023 and subsequently require significant ongoing effort. 1/1/2023 6th Cycle In Progress In Progress: Projected completion dates are indicated in the associated implementation action. See above rows. Other None Table D Page 16 of 16

8.a
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Reporting Period 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 Description of
Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
34 APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Very Low
Income
Low
Income
Moderate
Income
Above Moderate
Income
Description of
Commercial
Development Bonus
Commercial Development Bonus
Date Approved
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Units Constructed as Part of Agreement
Commercial Development Bonus Approved pursuant to GC Section 65915.7 Table E
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Project Identifier
1 2
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Annual Progress Report

8.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
The description should adequately document how each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code Section 65583.1+.

For detailed reporting requirements, see the chcklist here:

Extremely LowIncome+ Very Low- Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Extremely Low- Income+ Very Low- Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community- development/docs/adequate-sites-checklist.pdf Rehabilitation ActivityPreservation of Units At-RiskAcquisition of UnitsMobilehome Park PreservationTotal Units by Income Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD at [email protected] and we will unlock the form which enable you to populate these fields.

Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) Annual Progress Report

8.a
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Reporting Period 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulasPlanning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 Notes
23 6
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID
Unit
Category
(2 to 4,5+)
Tenure
R=Renter
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome
Non Deed
Restricted
Low- Income Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Total Moderate Income
Units Converted from
Above Moderate
Date
Converted Notes
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table F2
Above Moderate Income Units Converted to Moderate Income Pursuant to Government Code section 65400.2 For up to 25 percent of a jurisdiction’s moderate-income regional housing need allocation, the planning agency may include the number of units in an existing multifamily building that were converted to deed-restricted rental housing for moderate-income households by the imposition of affordability covenants and restriction for the unit. Before adding information to this table, please ensure housing developments meet the requirements described in Government Code 65400.2(b). 5 Project Identifier Unit Types
1 4
Affordability by Household Incomes After Conversion Units credited toward Moderate Income RHNA

8.a
Packet Pg. 190
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting
Period 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Housing Element Implementation
23 4
APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Realistic
Capacity
Identified in
the Housing
Element
Entity to whom the site
transferred Intended Use for Site
023-281-130 1220 Linda Mar
Blvd Sanchez Art Center Site #23 65 Pacifica Performances Existing lease extended for live performing arts and cultural programming 1 Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Table G
Locally Owned Lands Included in the Housing Element Sites Inventory that have been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of Project Identifier
element sites inventory contains a site which is or was owned by the reporting jurisdiction, and has been sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of during the reporting
year.

8.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting
Period 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 23 4 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
016-204-020 2212 Beach Blvd Public Facilities Surplus Land 1.85 Government / Public Facilities – City Council
Chamber, Sewer Pump Station, Public Works
Storage
016-294-620 2212 Beach Blvd Public Facilities Surplus Land 1.15 Government / Public Facilities – Public Works Storage
NOTE: This table must contain an inventory
of ALL surplus/excess lands the reporting
jurisdiction owns
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites

8.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31) Housing Element Implementation
Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031
Project Type Date
23 APN Street Address Project Name+
Local
Jurisdiction
Tracking ID+
Unit Category
(SH - Student
Housing)
Date
Very LowIncome Deed
Restricted
Very LowIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Deed
Restricted
Low- Income
Non Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Note:

Cells in grey
Table J
Student housing development for lower income students for which was granted a density bonus pursuant to subparagraph (F) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Se Project Identifier Units (Beds/Student Capacity) Approved 1 4
NOTE: STUDENT HOUSING WITH DENSITY BONUS
ONLY. This table only needs to be completed if there
were student housing projects WITH a density bonus
approved pursuant to Government
Code65915(b)(1)(F)
Annual Progress Report

8.a
Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report Jurisdiction Pacifica ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Reporting Period 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)Planning Period 6th Cycle 01/31/2023 - 01/31/2031 No
Table K
Tenant Preference Policy
Local governments are required to inform HCD about any local tenant preference ordinance the local government maintains when the jurisdiction submits their annual progress report on housing approvals and production, per Government Code 7061 (SB 649, 2022, Cortese). Effective January 1, 2023, local governments adopting a tenant preference are required to create a webpage on their internet website containing authorizing local ordinance and supporting materials, no more than 90 days after the ordinance becomes operational.

The City of Pacifica is currently conducting a disparate impacts analysis and is in the process of implementing a local tenant preference for four upcoming affordable housing units.

Does the Jurisdiction have a local tenant preference policy? If the jurisdiction has a local tenant preference policy, provide a link to the jurisdiction's webpage containing authorizing local ordinance and supporting materials.

Notes

8.a
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report Jurisdiction Pacifica Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting
Period 2025
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation
formulas
Size Notes
34 APN Street Address/Intersection Date of
Designation
Designation
Level
Historic Site
Period
Areas of
Significance
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
Summary Row:

NOTE: This table needs to be completed with any sites within your jurisdiction that were newly added to a National, State, or Local register of historic places within the reporting year. If none, leave blank.

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
Table L
Historical Resources
Parcel Identifier
1 Designation
2 8.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Jurisdiction Pacifica
Reporting Yea
r 2025 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Total Award Amount Total award amount is auto-populated based on amounts entered in rows 15-26.

Task $ Amount Awarded $ Cumulative Reimbursement Requested Other Funding Notes
Summary of entitlements, building permits, and certificates of occupancy (auto-populated from Table A2) Current Yea
r
Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
0 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
0 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
3 Deed Restricted
2 Non-Deed Restricted
1 Deed Restricted
1 Non-Deed Restricted
2 19
28 Current Yea
r
Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
0 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
0 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
6 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
5 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
54 20
Current Yea
r
Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
0 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
0 Deed Restricted
0 Non-Deed Restricted
2 Deed Restricted
2 Non-Deed Restricted
2 Deed Restricted
2 Non-Deed Restricted
2 21
31 Acutely Low
Extremely Low
Acutely Low
Extremely Low

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Reporting
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Please update the status of the proposed uses listed in the entity’s application for funding and the corresponding impact on housing within the region or jurisdiction, as applicable, categorized based on the eligible uses specified in Section 50515.02 or 50515.03, as applicable.
$ -
Task Status
Total Units
Certificate of Occupancy Issued by Affordability Summary Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Completed Entitlement Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Total Units
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Acutely Low
Extremely Low

8.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment A_Pacifica 2025 Housing Element APR Tables (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan General Plan Annual Progress Report for City of Pacifica 2025 Calendar Year
Contents
Introduction.............................................................................................................2 Date of Acceptance by City Council ..........................................................................2 Date of Most Recent General Plan Update.................................................................2 Implementation of Various Elements ........................................................................2 Economic Sustainability Element (ES)................................................................................2 Community Design Element (CD).......................................................................................3 Land Use Element (LU) ......................................................................................................4 Circulation Element (CI) ....................................................................................................5 Open Space and Community Facilities Element (OC) .........................................................6 Conservation Element (CO) ...............................................................................................7 Safety Element (SA) ...........................................................................................................8 Noise Element (NE) .........................................................................................................10 Housing Element (HE).............................................................................................10 General Plan Compliance with LCI’s General Plan Guidelines..................................11 Local Legislative Body’s Land Use Priorities ............................................................11 Goals, Policies, Objectives, Standards, or Other Plan Proposals ..............................12 Other Lists.............................................................................................................12 Planning activities initiated ...........................................................................................12 General Plan amendments ............................................................................................12 Major development applications processed .................................................................13 Attachment A: City Council Resolution No. Xx-2026.................................................14 Attachment B: Housing Element Annual Progress Report For Calendar Year 2025 .....15

8.b
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
2 Introduction
State law requires the City to submit annual reports by April 1st of each year on the status and progress of implementation of its General Plan during the prior calendar year to the City Council, Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Government Code § 65400). The following discussion complies with the state law requirements.

Staff have conducted a review of the City’s General Plan and prepared the report below outlining notable items related to implementation of elements of the City’s 2040 General Plan, which was adopted by the City Council in July 2022.

Date of Acceptance by City Council
The City Council of the City of Pacifica accepted the 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report at a regular meeting of the City Council on March 9, 2026. The City Council’s consideration of the Annual Progress Report included an opportunity for public comment. City Council Resolution No. xx-2026 is attached for reference.

Date of Most Recent General Plan Update
The City Council adopted the comprehensive 2040 General Plan update (except the Housing Element) to replace the City’s 1980 General Plan on July 11, 2022. The Housing Element was adopted separately on January 22, 2024, with further revisions adopted on March 24, 2025.

Implementation of Various Elements
Economic Sustainability Element (ES)
• ES-I-2: City-Owned Catalyst Projects. Use City-owned properties as catalysts for new development in the Palmetto area and elsewhere in the City.

The City initiated and completed the Surplus Land Act process for 2212 Beach Boulevard1 ,
a key city-owned site identified in the General Plan, Sharp Park Specific Plan, and Economic Development Study, and drafted a Request for Qualifications for interested developers. • ES-I-14: Broaden Business Marketing Efforts. Expand the City’s marketing efforts by developing a comprehensive marketing plan with tools and implementation strategies, focusing on targeted industries and businesses.

The San Francisco Peninsula (SFP) was selected by the Business Improvement District (BID) to manage the Visit Pacifica webpage. Noble Studios was also selected by the BID to 1 City Council Resolution No. 32-2025, dated April 28, 2025

8.b
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
3 improve the Visit Pacifica website’s search engine optimization. Once their engagement ends, SFP will take over full Visit Pacifica website management. • ES-I-17: Signage and Wayfinding. Implement a unified, unique signage and wayfinding program for the City’s distinct commercial and attractions.

The 2025 Sharp Park Wayfinding Signage Pilot Project was launched to improve visibility and navigation following input from the Economic Development Committee and local merchants. City Economic Development and Public Works staff collaborated to secure funding and evaluate land select locations for four new wayfinding signs at key intersections within Sharp Park. Signs will be installed in 2026. • ES-I-19: Host New Events. Promote regionally recognized events as a means of increasing awareness of Pacifica as a destination and fostering a positive image of the City as a place to visit, reside, and conduct business.

City staff supported planning and hosting of multiple annual events in 2025 including but not limited to Fog Fest, the dog surfing competition, LGBTQ+ pride parade, and Blues & Brews musical performance.

Community Design Element (CD)
• CD-G-4: Enhanced Mixed-Use Areas. Create distinctive mixed-use areas by ensuring good building form and building-sidewalk interface and providing pedestrian-oriented streets and public spaces.

The City adopted changes to the Zoning Ordinance as part of the Housing Element “Rezoning Program2
” on August 25, 20253 that include objective design and development standards for the new high-density residential and high-density mixed use residential zones that addressed building form, building-sidewalk interface, and pedestrian-oriented development along street frontages. The work done by the Planning Commission and City Council on these standards will inform future work on citywide objective design and development standards.
• CD-I-1: Primary Activity Centers: Create primary activity centers at West Sharp Park, Rockaway Beach, and Linda Mar, and neighborhood centers in Pacific Manor and Park Pacifica (at and around the Park Mall site); and CD-I-4: Support Infill and Redevelopment.

Support compatible residential infill on designated vacant lots as shown in Figure 4-3, and redevelopment of under-utilized commercial properties, and continue to use the City's Design Guidelines in evaluation of proposals that don't meet all development standards in residential districts.
2 HE-I-1 “General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA” 3 Ordinance 902-C.S., dated August 25, 2025

8.b
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
4 The City Council approved the third largest project in the past ten years at 570 Crespi Drive4 – a 19-unit, horizontal mixed use residential development that will provide approximately 3,000 square feet of street-facing commercial use and three below-market rate ownership units, among other features and benefits. The project contributes to a more diverse center of activity along Crespi Drive.
• CD-I-7: Commercial and Mixed-Use Building Form. Seek to ensure that new commercial and mixed-use development creates an attractive and human-scaled built environment.

Update the Zoning Ordinance and Design Guidelines to address mixed use access, building form, and building-sidewalk relationship.

See CD-G-4: Enhanced Mixed-Use Areas. Objective design and development standards adopted for new designations and zoning districts.

Land Use Element (LU)
• LU-I-1: Zoning Consistency. Update the Zoning Ordinance and zoning map and apply zoning to all land within the City, consistent with General Plan and LCLUP policies and land use designations; and LU-I-5: Density Ranges. Ensure that development is permitted within the allowable density range for the applicable land use designations.

The City adopted a “Rezoning Program,” as required by the adopted Housing Element Implementing Action HE-I-1 “General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA,” on August 11, 2025,
5 and August 25, 2025.6 The amendment created 12 high-density residential and high-density mixed-use residential General Plan designations and zoning districts and applied them to 30 of the sites identified in the Housing Element, creating consistency across planning documents. The City also introduced an amendment to the C2 zoning districts to be consistent with the General Plan Mixed-Use land use designations to allow horizontal mixed use (in addition to vertical mixed use) and align the minimum and maximum density allowances. 7 Community Development also initiated work with a consultant on zoning modernization which includes analyzing the consistency between the General Plan and Zoning districts and ordinances.
• LU-I-1.1: FAR Minimums. As part of the Zoning Ordinance, establish appropriate minimum FARs in commercial and mixed-use zoning districts. Land Divisions in the Coastal Zone.

See CD-G-4: Enhanced Mixed-Use Areas. Minimum commercial areas established for new mixed-use designations and zoning districts.

In accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 9, the City processed ministerial approvals with Planning Commission approval of Coastal Development Permits for urban lot splits in the 4 City Council Resolution No. 104-2025, dated December 2, 2025 5 City Council Resolution No. 73-2025, dated August 11, 2025 6 Ordinance 902-C.S., dated August 25, 2025
7 Introduced December 2, 2025; adoption scheduled January 2026

8.b
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
5 Coastal Zone. The proposed lot splits were required to be consistent with the objective standards of the 1980 Local Coastal Land Plan.
• LU-I-3: Coastal Development Permit Findings. For all developments that require a coastal development permit, continue to require written findings that it is consistent with all LCLUP policies and Implementation Plan provisions of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program.

The City’s comprehensive update to the Local Coastal Land Use Plan was certified by the California Coastal Commission on May 8, 2025. The Planning Commission and City staff made written findings for development subject to the new LCLUP based on the current policies.
• LU-I-16: Density Bonus. Continue to facilitate housing affordable to moderate-, low- and extremely-low-income households by providing a density bonus of up to 50 percent over the maximum allowed by zoning, consistent with State Government Code Sections 65915- 65918; and LU-I-16.1: Inclusionary Zoning Update. Consider an update to the City’s below-market rate (BMR) inclusionary zoning ordinance as an action program in a future Housing Element update to study an increase in the inclusionary requirement to 20 percent consistent with the requirements of state law, to evaluate longer terms of affordability, and other opportunities to expand the applicability of inclusionary zoning requirements to more projects.

The City Manager held a joint study session in October 2025 with City Council and the Planning Commission for direction on updates to the Density Bonus and Inclusionary Housing Ordinances and staff drafted comprehensive updates to both that will move forward in Spring of 2026. The City also entered into a Memorandum of Understanding for a multijurisdictional Residential Feasibility Study, which began in July 2025. • LU-I-38: Lower Crespi Drive. Establish zoning provisions to facilitate compact, mixed-use redevelopment of older commercial and residential properties along lower Crespi Drive, consistent with the Mixed Use Center and Mixed Use Neighborhood designations as shown in the Land Use Diagram.

See CD-I-1: Primary Activity Centers and CD-I-4: Support Infill and Redevelopment.

Circulation Element (CI)
• CI-I-27: Sharp Park Specific Plan Streetscape. Complete and implement streetscape improvements in the Sharp Park Specific Plan to widen sidewalks, provide bike lanes, landscaping, and make other improvements that will upgrade the appearance of the area and make it more attractive to pedestrians.

The Sharp Park ADA Pedestrian Improvement Project closed sidewalk gaps, improved sidewalks to current ADA standards, installed new ADA-compliant driveways and corner

8.b
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
6 curb ramps in the six blocks around downtown area; the project bid closed in November 2024 and the notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025. • CI-I-31: Neighborhood Bikeways. Develop a system of bikeways connecting all neighborhoods to the City’s north-south pathway consistent with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.

The Esplanade and Palmetto Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project installed new and improved existing Class 2 and Class 3 bike lanes along Palmetto Avenue, West Avalon Drive, and Esplanade Avenue. The project also enhanced pedestrian safety by installing quick-build painted bulb out safety zones at pedestrian crossings, curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at several intersections. The notice of completion was approved October 27, 2025.
• CI-I-52: Age-Friendly Community. Support mobility programs and improvements that enable mobility for all people, including seniors and people with disabilities.

The City continued to operate several programs to address mobility for all people, including seniors and people with disabilities:
• A senior shuttle program to bring seniors to the Community Center lunch program during weekdays.
• A Connect a Ride program for seniors to access low-cost taxi rides (supported by the generosity of the late Sirkka Niukkanen).
• A Shopping Assistance for Seniors Homebound (SASH) program that pairs a SASH volunteer with a senior who cannot shop due to limited mobility or lack of transportation.
• A Meals on Wheels program to deliver meals to homebound seniors.

Open Space and Community Facilities Element (OC)
• OC-I-4 Emphasize Park Maintenance and Improvements. Enhance existing parks to improve the quality and usability of Pacifica’s park land, and make improvements such that park facilities are equitably distributed throughout Pacifica.

In 2025, the City completed final bid documents and playground plans for the Priority Parks projects. The work was bid in late fall, and on December 8th 2025 the City Council selected a contractor to begin construction. The four parks scheduled for modernization in 2026 are Imperial Park, Marvella Park, Skyridge Park, and Brighton Mini Park. • OC-I-15: Pedro Point Headlands. Complete the planned transfer of City-owned land on Pedro Point Headlands to an appropriate public or private land steward, and pursue land and/or trail easement acquisition if necessary to connect Headlands trails with the Coastal Trail in Pacifica.OC-I-63: Senior and Community Services.

8.b
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
7 The City Manager and staff from Community Development and Public Works participated in a multi-agency working group with representatives from the National Park Service, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and the California Coastal Conservancy to continue advancement of this policy.
• OC-I-63: Senior and Community Services. Continue to use available funding sources to maintain and enhance the City’s Senior Services program, including meal services, transportation, and counseling. In addition, continue to support non-profit service providers in offering other needed community services.

See CI-I-52: Age-Friendly Community.

Conservation Element (CO)
• CO-I-21: Development Strategies to Preserve Open Space. Continue to promote densityopen space trade-offs, such as clustering development, transferring development rights from sensitive to less sensitive land, and dedication or protection of open space through covenants or consecutive easements.

As part of the 570 Crespi Drive mixed-use residential development described above in CDI-1: Primary Activity Centers and CD-I-4: Support Infill and Redevelopment, the City redesignated the undevelopable portions of the site from Mixed Use Center to Conservation.8 • CO-I-54: Climate Action Plan for Greenhouse Gas Reductions. Maintain and update the Climate Action Plan that focuses on feasible actions the City can take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from government, businesses, and residents in Pacifica.

In July 2025, the City adopted the Climate Action and Resiliency Plan (CARP), 9 establishing
Pacifica’s updated framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and advancing community resilience. The CARP builds upon prior climate planning efforts and provides a coordinated set of implementation actions addressing municipal operations, transportation and land use, building energy, waste reduction, water conservation, and community-based initiatives.

Following adoption of the CARP, the City Council established the Climate Action and Resiliency Committee (CARC)10 to support ongoing implementation, monitoring, and public engagement. The CARC is charged with advising the City Council on prioritization of actions, reviewing progress toward emission reduction targets, and providing a public forum for continued community involvement.

In late 2025, staff formalized internal coordination of climate action efforts to align with the adopted CARP, consolidating existing initiatives and resource planning under a unified implementation framework. CARP actions were incorporated into departmental work 8 City Council Resolution No. 103-2025, dated December 2, 2025 9 City Council Resolution No. 64-2025, dated July 14, 2025 10 City Council Resolution No. 85-2025, dated September 8, 2025

8.b
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
8 planning processes and aligned with the City’s budget development and performance tracking systems, establishing an ongoing structure for cross-departmental implementation beginning in 2026.
• CO-I-59: Beach Boulevard Property. Continue to pursue redevelopment of the City-owned Beach Boulevard property, and include arrangements for ongoing Council Chambers facilities.

See ES-I-2: City-Owned Catalyst Projects.
• COI-63: Wastewater and Water System Efficiency. Maximize the efficiency of Cityoperated wastewater treatment, water treatment, pumping, and distribution equipment.

The Lower Linda Mar Rehabilitation and Repair Project replaced over 30,000 feet of sewer mains, reducing the risk of sanitary sewer spills and Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the wastewater system. I&I contributes to the risk of spills, and additional energy and resource use in collecting, pumping and treating sanitary sewage.

The Ultraviolet Disinfection System Replacement Project replaced existing disinfection equipment a more modern and efficient system. The new system is projected to use up to 80 percent less energy to disinfect wastewater.
• CO-I-72: Removal of Barriers to Public Participation. Implement efforts to remove barriers that may prevent underrepresented communities from public participation opportunities.

The Climate Adaptation and Action Plan Taskforce and City staff utilized “Climate Lotería,
11” a bilingual engagement tool based on a popular Mexican bingo game, to enhance outreach to Spanish-speaking community members during the 2025 Climate Action and Adaptation Plan drafting process. The tool was also used in 2025 to support ongoing community awareness and engagement efforts following CARP adoption.

Through the Partnership for the Bay’s Future (PBF) grant, Community Development staff, the PBF fellow, and community partners HEART of San Mateo County and Pacifica Resource Center formed a Site Team to work on Housing Element implementation programs with a focus on community engagement.

Safety Element (SA)
• SA-I-94: Development Review. Review development proposals to ensure that they incorporate appropriate fire-mitigation measures, including adequate provisions for evacuation and access by emergency responders, and vegetation clearances that do not impact ESHAs or wetlands; and SA-I-95: Plan Review in Fire-Prone Areas. Continue to 11 Climate Lotería graphics and content were developed by MIG Consulting, Inc.

8.b
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
9 request the North County Fire Authority participation in plan review of new buildings in potentially fire-prone areas;
The City adopted the Office of the State Fire Marshall fire hazard severity zone Local Areas of Responsibility (LRA) Maps.12 Applicable codes were enforced through the Building Official and North County Fire Authority reviews of both development applications and building permits. The City also adopted the 2025 California Building Standards Code13 which contains updated fire safety codes.
• SA-I-99: Multi-Jurisdictional Approach. Participate in State or regional efforts to develop a clear legislative and regulatory framework to manage the wildland-urban interface, including implementation of the MJ-LHMP.

In 2024, nine jurisdictions in San Mateo County formed the Safety Element Collaborative to coordinate updates to their Safety Elements as part of the Peninsula Resilience Project. The project team completed a countywide vulnerability assessment and hazard mapping effort, including development of a geodatabase of hazard data, a GIS database of community assets, identification of sensitive populations and critical facilities, evacuation constraints analysis, and preparation of an online map viewer. The Draft Vulnerability Assessment Report 14 and the interactive map, reflecting this work, were published in spring 2025. 15 The Pacifica Police Department, in partnership with the North Coast County Fire Authority, conducted several community outreach events in 2025 to promote emergency preparedness and self-sufficiency. These efforts included hosting two eight-week Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) academies, participating in Tsunami Preparedness Week in March 2025, and supporting Earthquake Preparedness activities in October 2025, along with several pop-up events at the Farmers Market and Fog Fest. • SA-I-107: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Continue to maintain and update a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan as an implementation action for the Safety Element.

City staff representing Police, Fire, Community Development, and Public Works participated in the multi-jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) kick off meeting and Cal Office of Emergency Services training. The LHMP update begins in 2026 and will require ongoing participation. In addition, staff collaborated with the San Mateo County Emergency Managers Office to promote the upcoming Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). As part of this effort, a community survey was distributed to gather input on hazards affecting local neighborhoods. The survey was promoted across multiple platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, Nextdoor, and the City’s weekly Connect with Pacifica update.
12 Ordinance No. 900-2025, dated June 9, 2025
13 Ordinance No. 904-C.S., dated November 10, 2025
14 Peninsula Resilience Project—Pacifica
15 Safety Element Map Viewer

8.b
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
10 Noise Element (NE)
There was no reportable action on implementation of the Noise Element.

Housing Element (HE)
The City of Pacifica's 2023-2031 Housing Element was formally adopted by the City Council on March 24, 2025, with certification by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) effective as of September 19, 2025.

Staff have prepared the Calendar Year 2025 APR in the format prescribed by HCD (Attachment B) and submitted it electronically to HCD on Month Day, 2026, after City Council accepted the report on March 9, 2026.

This is the third APR associated with the 2023-2031 Housing Element. The City’s RHNA 6 allocation for the planning period 2023-2031 is 1,892 housing units. This is an increase of 1,479 units or a 358 percent increase, compared to the RHNA 5 allocation. The 2025 APR prepared by staff demonstrates the number of housing units for which the City granted planning entitlements (i.e., discretionary approvals), building permits, and certificates of occupancy during the 2025 calendar year.

The APR is a routine item required by state law to report on housing-related activities in the prior calendar year and is not a policy document guiding housing-related actions to be undertaken by the City. The APR must be considered by the Council at a public meeting where members of the public have an opportunity to provide comments. Members of the public may comment on the APR during public comment as part of consideration of the item. Acceptance of the APR is a routine matter, and the report is informational only.

The APR also highlights other accomplishments and milestones achieved throughout the 2025 reporting period. Staff reports the following observations as compared to the 2024 APR reviewed by Council in terms of housing unit production:
• In 2025, housing unit production, measured by building permits, remained stable at 20 units, (20 units were also approved in 2024). Similarly, 31 Certificates of Occupancy (C/Os) were issued, slightly below 43 for the previous year.
• In 2025, 7 of the 31 C/Os issued were for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), representing 23 percent of C/Os. In 2025, 24 C/Os were issued as a part of the 801 Fassler Drive multiplex (not ADUs). ADUs comprised 93 percent of the C/Os that were issued in 2024: 40 of the 43 C/Os issued.
• The City received applications for 23 ADUs in 2025 (27 in 2024). Of these, all were approved ministerially. The City issued 18 building permits and 7 C/Os for ADUs in 2025. • The City continues to process applications under the state law known as Senate Bill 9, or SB 9. SB 9 allows for ministerial approval (i.e., no discretionary review) of two residential unit projects and/or urban lot splits of existing lots for projects that meet the qualifying criteria in the law. Six SB 9 applications have been submitted, four of which were approved in 2025 (two are pending).
• Twenty-two housing units were entitled in 2025 through the processing of residential development applications (compared to 2 in 2024). The City of Pacifica does not have a

8.b
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
11 discretionary entitlement process for ADUs which are processed ministerially. In 2025, 6 ADUs were approved ministerially.
• In 2025, the City received complete applications for 40 housing units, a substantial decrease from 397 in 2024 but consistent with 64 in 2023. In 2024, the city received applications for an unusually large number of units due to two applications: Pacifica Gateway on Coast Highway, south of Reina del Mar Avenue (APNs 018-140-690, & 018-140- 700) for 225 units, and Sea Cove at 4625 Coast Highway for 117 units. No APR-qualifying entitlements or permits were issued for these two projects in 2025.

The General Plan complies with LCI’s General Plan Guidelines. Although the City of Pacifica is not required to have an Environmental Justice element, environmental justice policies and considerations are included throughout the plan.

Local Legislative Body’s Land Use Priorities
There were no new priorities for land use decision-making that were established by the local legislative body.

8.b
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
12 Goals, Policies, Objectives, Standards, or Other Plan Proposals Goals, policies, objectives, standards, or other plan proposals that need to be added or were deleted, amended or otherwise adjusted.

Pacifica adopted, and in May 2025 the California Coastal Commission certified a comprehensive update the City’s Local Coastal Land Use Plan (LCLUP) in May 2025. The new LCLUP replaces the original 1980 plan. With the adoption of the City’s Housing Element and subsequent Rezoning Program, the LCLUP must be amended to include two new high-density mixed use residential use land use designations that were added to the General Plan (MU-30 and MU-60) within the Coastal Zone, and update LCLUP policies related to construction during nesting season and preconstruction bat surveys for consistency with changes. The City also initiated updated coastal hazard mapping in 2025, which will be required to incorporate into the LCLUP, and submitted three Local Coastal Plan Amendments for Coastal Commission certification in 2025 for changes to the Outdoor Commercial Activities and Short-Term Rentals ordinances, and the Sharp Park Specific Plan.

Following the adoption of the Housing Element and the LCLUP, the City began evaluating the Zoning Ordinance for consistency with the 2040 General Plan through HE-I-2 Zoning Modernization and Streamlining in 2025.

In 2025, the City participated in a multijurisdictional working group focused on Senate Bill 1425 “Advancing Climate Resilience through Open Space Updates” and Assembly Bill 1889 “Enhancing Wildlife Movement and Connectivity Planning. The City will be evaluating the Open Space and Conservation Elements, both adopted in 2022, for compliance in 2026 – 2028.

Other Lists
One or more lists of the following, including reference to the specific general plan element or policy, status (i.e., approved/denied, initiated/ongoing/completed, etc.), and a brief comment on how each advanced the implementation of the General Plan during the past year:

Planning activities initiated
These may include but are not limited to, master plans, specific plans, master environmental assessments, annexation studies, and other studies or plans.

The City did not initiate any major planning activities in 2025, however, Housing Element and the comprehensive update to the LCLUP were adopted by City Council and certified by HCD and the Coastal Commission, respectively.

General Plan amendments
These may include agency-driven as well as applicant-driven amendments.

Two General Plan amendments were adopted in 2025.
(1) The City adopted a Rezoning Program, as required by the adopted Housing Element Implementing Action HE-I-1 “General Plan and Zoning Amendments to Achieve RHNA,” on August

8.b
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
13 11, 2025. 16 The amendment created 12 high-density residential and high-density mixed-use residential General Plan land use designations and redesignated 30 sites identified in the Housing Element. The amendment also made changes to two Conservation Element policies – Construction During Nesting Season (CO-I-33) and Pre-Construction Bat Surveys (CO-I-34) to comply with current Department and Fish and Wildlife requirements.

This advanced the implementation of the Housing Element of the General Plan by substantially fulfilling the program requirements of HE-I-1 and created additional capacity for housing development to achieve RHNA. The amendment also provides greater species protections. (2) The second amendment was related to a housing development project and included redesignating undevelopable portions of the site from Mixed Use Center to Conservation,17 consistent with the established exclusion of lot area containing sensitive areas such as wetlands from density calculations.

This advanced the implementation of the General Plan by properly designating a wetland area as conservation.

Major development applications processed
The City approved the planning entitlements (Development Agreement, Rezoning, General Plan Amendment, and Development Permits) for third largest project in the past 11 years. The project is a mixed-use housing development with 19 residential units, including three below market rate units, and 3,000 square feet of commercial space.
16 City Council Resolution No. 73-2025, dated August 11, 2025 17 City Council Resolution No. 103-2025, dated December 2, 2025

8.b
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
14 Attachment A: City Council Resolution No. Xx-2026

8.b
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the General Plan Annual Progress Report
City of Pacifica
Calendar Year 2025
15 Attachment B: Housing Element Annual Progress Report For Calendar Year 2025

8.b
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment B_Pacifica 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report (6165 : Annual Progress Report on Implementation of the

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
3/9/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Mid-year budget review and adoption of a resolution to amend the Fiscal Year 2025-26 budget.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the mid-year FY 2025-26 Operating and Capital Budget amendments.

STAFF CONTACT:

Yulia Carter, Assistant City Manager
650-738-7301
[email protected]
Marisol Gómez, Director of Finance and Administrative Services 650-501-0257
[email protected]
BACKGROUND:

The Finance staff has completed a Mid-year Budget review and is proposing adjustments to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget.

The purpose of the mid-year budget review is to analyze the year-to-date revenues and expenditures to review assumptions made before the budget cycle and make necessary adjustments to reflect changes in the City's financial conditions. The mid-year budget review is also a segue to the next fiscal year's budget development process, as the mid-year analysis is used to develop the base budget assumptions for the new year.

On June 23, 2025, the City Council adopted a balanced FY 2025-26 Budget that reflected the Council's Strategic Plan and priorities for the upcoming fiscal year. This FY 2025-26 Mid-year Budget report will focus on the following key objectives:

1. Updating City Council on the status of revenues and expenditures within the FY 2025-26 General Fund and requesting mid-year amendments to the General Fund as follows:
revenue increase of $393,898 and appropriation expenditure increase of $289,576.

Recognizing all previously approved by the Council revenues of $68,896 (Attachment and 3) for a total revised revenue budget of $462,794 (Table 1). Recognizing all previously approved by the Council expenditure increases of $1,695,673 (Attachment 1 and 4) for a total revised expenditure budget of $1,985,249 (Table 2). 9 Packet Pg. 212
Pacifica City Council 2
March 09, 2026

2. Updating City Council on the status of revenues and expenditures within the FY 2025-26 Non-General Fund and requesting mid-year amendments to (Other) Funds of a revenue increase of $833,671 and expenditures amendments of $2,002,838. Recognizing all previously approved by Council adjustments to other funds in Attachments 1, 3 and 4.

3. Updating Council on the projected fund balance for all City Funds through June 30, 2026 (Attachment 5).

4. Updating Council on the progress of the FY 2025-26 service enhancements approved at budget adoption (Attachment 6).

The FY 2025-26 Revised General Fund budget reflects $53.6 million in revenue, $55.2 million in total expenditures, including $50,000 in capital project expenditures. The difference between the budgeted revenues and expenditures creates an initial gap of $(1,504,247). However, this gap is addressed through previously approved Council budget strategies, as described in Section 3 of this report. After applying these strategies, the mid-year revised budget is presented as balanced (Table 3). Based on the revised projections, the General Fund balance is estimated to be $21,081,400 as of June 30, 2026. It is important to note, that balancing the budget through on one-time revenue sources and other short-term strategies, does not represent a structurally balanced budget, where ongoing revenues are sufficient to support ongoing expenditures.

Staff used the following methodology for the mid-year budget analysis: the year-end estimates in operating revenues and expenditures exceeding the adopted budget by 5% and $25,000 in each revenue and expense category or cost center were considered material in nature and are being proposed for a budget adjustment.

1. Status of General Fund Revenues and Expenditures in FY 2025-26 Revised Budget FY 2025-26 General Fund Revenues
The General Fund is the City’s primary operating fund and is used to account for most day-today activities. It receives unrestricted revenues and provides the City’s general administrative services, public safety, parks, beaches and recreation, public works, and community development-related activities such as planning, building, and engineering. Revenue sources include but are not limited to property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax (TOT), business tax registration, and current fees and charges for services.

Pacifica City CouncilMarch 9, 2026

Pacifica City Council
March 9, 2026