Pacifica City Council
April 13, 2026

Agreement No. __________________________
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AND PETDATA, INC.

This Agreement is entered into this Fourth day of June, 2019, by and between the County of San Mateo, a political subdivision of the state of California, hereinafter called “County,” and PETDATA, INC., hereinafter called “Contractor.”
* * *
Whereas, pursuant to Section 31000 of the California Government Code, County may contract with independent contractors for the furnishing of such services to or for County or any Department thereof; and
Whereas, it is necessary and desirable that Contractor be retained for the purpose of San Mateo County Health- Public Health, Policy & Planning.

Now, therefore, it is agreed by the parties to this Agreement as follows:

1. Exhibits and Attachments
The following exhibits and attachments are attached to this Agreement and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference:

Exhibit A—Services
Exhibit B—Payments and Rates
Attachment I—§ 504 Compliance
Services to be performed by Contractor
In consideration of the payments set forth in this Agreement and in Exhibit B, Contractor shall perform services for County in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications set forth in this Agreement and in Exhibit A.

2. Payments
In consideration of the services provided by Contractor in accordance with all terms, conditions, and specifications set forth in this Agreement and in Exhibit A, County shall make payment to Contractor based on the rates and in the manner specified in Exhibit B. County reserves the right to withhold payment if County determines that the quantity or quality of the work performed is unacceptable. In no event shall County’s total fiscal obligation under this Agreement exceed SIX HUNDRED-THIRTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE DOLLARS ($613,945). In the event that the County makes any advance payments, Contractor agrees to refund any amounts in excess of the amount owed by the County at the time of contract termination or expiration. Contractor is not entitled to payment for work not performed as required by this agreement.

3. Term
Subject to compliance with all terms and conditions, the term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2022.

4. Termination
This Agreement may be terminated by Contractor or by the Director of Public Health, Policy and Planning or his/her designee at any time without a requirement of good cause upon thirty (30) days’ advance

6.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

written notice to the other party. Subject to availability of funding, Contractor shall be entitled to receive payment for work/services provided prior to termination of the Agreement. Such payment shall be that prorated portion of the full payment determined by comparing the work/services actually completed to the work/services required by the Agreement.

County may terminate this Agreement or a portion of the services referenced in the Attachments and Exhibits based upon the unavailability of Federal, State, or County funds by providing written notice to Contractor as soon as is reasonably possible after County learns of said unavailability of outside funding.

County may terminate this Agreement for cause. In order to terminate for cause, County must first give Contractor notice of the alleged breach. Contractor shall have five business days after receipt of such notice to respond and a total of ten calendar days after receipt of such notice to cure the alleged breach.

If Contractor fails to cure the breach within this period, County may immediately terminate this Agreement without further action. The option available in this paragraph is separate from the ability to terminate without cause with appropriate notice described above. In the event that County provides notice of an alleged breach pursuant to this section, County may, in extreme circumstances, immediately suspend performance of services and payment under this Agreement pending the resolution of the process described in this paragraph. County has sole discretion to determine what constitutes an extreme circumstance for purposes of this paragraph, and County shall use reasonable judgment in making that determination.

5. Contract Materials
At the end of this Agreement, or in the event of termination, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, maps, photographs, reports, and other written materials (collectively referred to as “contract materials”) prepared by Contractor under this Agreement shall become the property of County and shall be promptly delivered to County. Upon termination, Contractor may make and retain a copy of such contract materials if permitted by law.

6. Relationship of Parties
Contractor agrees and understands that the work/services performed under this Agreement are performed as an independent contractor and not as an employee of County and that neither Contractor nor its employees acquire any of the rights, privileges, powers, or advantages of County employees.

7. Hold Harmless
a. General Hold Harmless
Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless County and its officers, agents, employees, and servants from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description resulting from this Agreement, the performance of any work or services required of Contractor under this Agreement, or payments made pursuant to this Agreement brought for, or on account of, any of the following:
(A) injuries to or death of any person, including Contractor or its employees/officers/agents; (B) damage to any property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging;

6.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

(C) any sanctions, penalties, or claims of damages resulting from Contractor’s failure to comply, if applicable, with the requirements set forth in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and all Federal regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended; or (D) any other loss or cost, including but not limited to that caused by the concurrent active or passive negligence of County and/or its officers, agents, employees, or servants. However, Contractor’s duty to indemnify and save harmless under this Section shall not apply to injuries or damage for which County has been found in a court of competent jurisdiction to be solely liable by reason of its own negligence or willful misconduct.

The duty of Contractor to indemnify and save harmless as set forth by this Section shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code.

8. Assignability and Subcontracting
Contractor shall not assign this Agreement or any portion of it to a third party or subcontract with a third party to provide services required by Contractor under this Agreement without the prior written consent of County. Any such assignment or subcontract without County’s prior written consent shall give County the right to automatically and immediately terminate this Agreement without penalty or advance notice.

9. Insurance
a. General Requirements
Contractor shall not commence work or be required to commence work under this Agreement unless and until all insurance required under this Section has been obtained and such insurance has been approved by County’s Risk Management, and Contractor shall use diligence to obtain such insurance and to obtain such approval. Contractor shall furnish County with certificates of insurance evidencing the required coverage, and there shall be a specific contractual liability endorsement extending Contractor’s coverage to include the contractual liability assumed by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement. These certificates shall specify or be endorsed to provide that thirty (30) days’ notice must be given, in writing, to County of any pending change in the limits of liability or of any cancellation or modification of the policy. b. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance Contractor shall have in effect during the entire term of this Agreement workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance providing full statutory coverage. In signing this Agreement, Contractor certifies, as required by Section 1861 of the California Labor Code, that (a) it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of the Labor Code, and (b) it will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of work under this Agreement.
c. Liability Insurance
Contractor shall take out and maintain during the term of this Agreement such bodily injury liability and property damage liability insurance as shall protect Contractor and all of its employees/officers/agents while performing work covered by this Agreement from any and all claims for damages for bodily injury, including accidental death, as well as any and all claims for property damage which may arise from Contractor’s operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them, or an agent of either of them.

6.b
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

Such insurance shall be combined single limit bodily injury and property damage for each occurrence and shall not be less than the amounts specified below:
(a) Comprehensive General Liability… $1,000,000
County and its officers, agents, employees, and servants shall be named as additional insured on any such policies of insurance, which shall also contain a provision that (a) the insurance afforded thereby to County and its officers, agents, employees, and servants shall be primary insurance to the full limits of liability of the policy and (b) if the County or its officers, agents, employees, and servants have other insurance against the loss covered by such a policy, such other insurance shall be excess insurance only.

In the event of the breach of any provision of this Section, or in the event any notice is received which indicates any required insurance coverage will be diminished or canceled, County, at its option, may, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, immediately declare a material breach of this Agreement and suspend all further work and payment pursuant to this Agreement.

10. Compliance With Laws
All services to be performed by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed in accordance with all applicable Federal, State, County, and municipal laws, ordinances, and regulations, including but not limited to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Federal Regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended (if applicable), the Business Associate requirements set forth in Attachment H (if attached), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs and activities receiving any Federal or County financial assistance. Such services shall also be performed in accordance with all applicable ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to appropriate licensure, certification regulations, provisions pertaining to confidentiality of records, and applicable quality assurance regulations. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any applicable State, Federal, County, or municipal law or regulation, the requirements of the applicable law or regulation will take precedence over the requirements set forth in this Agreement.

Contractor will timely and accurately complete, sign, and submit all necessary documentation of compliance.

11. Non-Discrimination and Other Requirements
a. General Non-discrimination
No person shall be denied any services provided pursuant to this Agreement (except as limited by the scope of services) on the grounds of race, color, national origin, ancestry, age, disability (physical or mental), sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital or domestic partner status, religion, political beliefs or affiliation, familial or parental status (including pregnancy), medical condition (cancer-related), military service, or genetic information.
b. Equal Employment Opportunity

6.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

Contractor shall ensure equal employment opportunity based on objective standards of recruitment, classification, selection, promotion, compensation, performance evaluation, and management relations for all employees under this Agreement. Contractor’s equal employment policies shall be made available to County upon request.
c. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Contractor shall comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, which provides that no otherwise qualified individual with a disability shall, solely by reason of a disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in the performance of any services this Agreement. This Section applies only to contractors who are providing services to members of the public under this Agreement.
d. Compliance with County’s Equal Benefits Ordinance
Contractor shall comply with all laws relating to the provision of benefits to its employees and their spouses or domestic partners, including, but not limited to, such laws prohibiting discrimination in the provision of such benefits on the basis that the spouse or domestic partner of the Contractor’s employee is of the same or opposite sex as the employee.
e. Discrimination Against Individuals with Disabilities The nondiscrimination requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-741.5(a) are incorporated into this Agreement as if fully set forth here, and Contractor and any subcontractor shall abide by the requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60–741.5(a). This regulation prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals on the basis of disability and requires affirmative action by covered prime contractors and subcontractors to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities.
f. History of Discrimination
Contractor certifies that no finding of discrimination has been issued in the past 365 days against Contractor by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, or any other investigative entity. If any finding(s) of discrimination have been issued against Contractor within the past 365 days by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, or other investigative entity, Contractor shall provide County with a written explanation of the outcome(s) or remedy for the discrimination prior to execution of this Agreement. Failure to comply with this Section shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement and subjects the Agreement to immediate termination at the sole option of the County. g. Reporting; Violation of Non-discrimination Provisions Contractor shall report to the County Manager the filing in any court or with any administrative agency of any complaint or allegation of discrimination on any of the bases prohibited by this Section of the Agreement or the Section titled “Compliance with Laws”. Such duty shall include reporting of the filing of any and all charges with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, or any other entity charged with the investigation or adjudication of allegations covered by this subsection within 30 days of such filing, provided that within such 30 days such entity has not notified Contractor that such charges are dismissed or otherwise unfounded. Such notification shall include a general description of the circumstances involved and a general description of the kind of discrimination alleged (for example, gender-, sexual orientation-, religion-, or race-based discrimination).

6.b
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

Violation of the non-discrimination provisions of this Agreement shall be considered a breach of this Agreement and subject the Contractor to penalties, to be determined by the County Manager, including but not limited to the following:
i. termination of this Agreement;
ii. disqualification of the Contractor from being considered for or being awarded a County contract for a period of up to 3 years;
iii. liquidated damages of $2,500 per violation; and/or iv. imposition of other appropriate contractual and civil remedies and sanctions, as determined by the County Manager.

To effectuate the provisions of this Section, the County Manager shall have the authority to offset all or any portion of the amount described in this Section against amounts due to Contractor under this Agreement or any other agreement between Contractor and County. h. Compliance with Living Wage Ordinance
As required by Chapter 2.88 of the San Mateo County Ordinance Code, Contractor certifies all contractor(s) and subcontractor(s) obligated under this contract shall fully comply with the provisions of the County of San Mateo Living Wage Ordinance, including, but not limited to, paying all Covered Employees the current Living Wage and providing notice to all Covered Employees and Subcontractors as required under the Ordinance.

12. Compliance with County Employee Jury Service Ordinance Contractor shall comply with Chapter 2.85 of the County’s Ordinance Code, which states that Contractor shall have and adhere to a written policy providing that its employees, to the extent they are full-time employees and live in San Mateo County, shall receive from the Contractor, on an annual basis, no fewer than five days of regular pay for jury service in San Mateo County, with jury pay being provided only for each day of actual jury service. The policy may provide that such employees deposit any fees received for such jury service with Contractor or that the Contractor may deduct from an employee’s regular pay the fees received for jury service in San Mateo County. By signing this Agreement, Contractor certifies that it has and adheres to a policy consistent with Chapter 2.85. For purposes of this Section, if Contractor has no employees in San Mateo County, it is sufficient for Contractor to provide the following written statement to County: “For purposes of San Mateo County’s jury service ordinance, Contractor certifies that it has no full-time employees who live in San Mateo County. To the extent that it hires any such employees during the term of its Agreement with San Mateo County, Contractor shall adopt a policy that complies with Chapter 2.85 of the County’s Ordinance Code.” The requirements of Chapter 2.85 do not apply if this Agreement’s total value listed in the Section titled “Payments”, is less than one-hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), but Contractor acknowledges that Chapter 2.85’s requirements will apply if this Agreement is amended such that its total value meets or exceeds that threshold amount.

13. Retention of Records; Right to Monitor and Audit
(a) Contractor shall maintain all required records relating to services provided under this Agreement for three (3) years after County makes final payment and all other pending matters are closed, and Contractor shall be subject to the examination and/or audit by County, a Federal grantor agency, and the State of California.

6.b
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

(b) Contractor shall comply with all program and fiscal reporting requirements set forth by applicable Federal, State, and local agencies and as required by County. (c) Contractor agrees upon reasonable notice to provide to County, to any Federal or State department having monitoring or review authority, to County’s authorized representative, and/or to any of their respective audit agencies access to and the right to examine all records and documents necessary to determine compliance with relevant Federal, State, and local statutes, rules, and regulations, to determine compliance with this Agreement, and to evaluate the quality, appropriateness, and timeliness of services performed.

14. Merger Clause; Amendments
This Agreement, including the Exhibits and Attachments attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference, constitutes the sole Agreement of the parties to this Agreement and correctly states the rights, duties, and obligations of each party as of this document’s date. In the event that any term, condition, provision, requirement, or specification set forth in the body of this Agreement conflicts with or is inconsistent with any term, condition, provision, requirement, or specification in any Exhibit and/or Attachment to this Agreement, the provisions of the body of the Agreement shall prevail. Any prior agreement, promises, negotiations, or representations between the parties not expressly stated in this document are not binding. All subsequent modifications or amendments shall be in writing and signed by the parties.

15. Controlling Law; Venue
The validity of this Agreement and of its terms, the rights and duties of the parties under this Agreement, the interpretation of this Agreement, the performance of this Agreement, and any other dispute of any nature arising out of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to its choice of law or conflict of law rules. Any dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be venued either in the San Mateo County Superior Court or in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

16. Notices
Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted under this Agreement shall be deemed to be properly given when both: (1) transmitted via facsimile to the telephone number listed below or transmitted via email to the email address listed below; and (2) sent to the physical address listed below by either being deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, or deposited for overnight delivery, charges prepaid, with an established overnight courier that provides a tracking number showing confirmation of receipt.

In the case of County, to:

Name/Title: Cassius Lockett, Director of Public Health, Policy and Planning Address: 225-37th Avenue, Room 178
San Mateo, CA 94403
Telephone: 650.573.2532
Facsimile: 650.573.2788
Email: [email protected]

6.b
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

In the case of Contractor, to:

Name/Title: President, PetData, Inc.

Address: 8585 N Stemmons Fwy, Suite 1100-N
Dallas, TX 75247
Telephone: 214.821.3100 x515
Facsimile: 214.821.3106
Email: [email protected]

17. Electronic Signature
Both County and Contractor wish to permit this Agreement and future documents relating to this Agreement to be digitally signed in accordance with California law and County’s Electronic Signature Administrative Memo. Any party to this Agreement may revoke such agreement to permit electronic signatures at any time in relation to all future documents by providing notice pursuant to this Agreement.

18. Payment of Permits/Licenses
Contractor bears responsibility to obtain any license, permit, or approval required from any agency for work/services to be performed under this Agreement at Contractor’s own expense prior to commencement of said work/services. Failure to do so will result in forfeit of any right to compensation under this Agreement.
* * *

6.b
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

6.b
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

Exhibit A
In consideration of the payments set forth in Exhibit B and with a focus on increasing licensing and vaccination compliance throughout the County of San Mateo, Contractor shall provide the following services:

A. Management of the daily operations for animal licensing including:

1. Data Entry & Processing
a. Process correspondence from pet owners including, but not limited to, issuing tags.
b. Work in partnership with the County on an approved template to provide timely billing and renewal notices to pet owners, with at least one billing to both new and renewals to be printed on an 8.5x11 sheet of paper with a return envelope enclosed. In addition, at least one of the notices will provide pet owner with the date in which the late fee became due.
c. Provide data entry of both new and renewal licenses and vaccination information. d. Implement procedures for verification of information submitted. e. Ensure complete, unduplicated, and accurate information. f. Process, collect, and provide receipts for animal licensing fees. g. Provide licensing and vaccination data for a weekly transfer of data from the Contractor’s database into County’s proprietary database. h. Provide customer service including communication with citizens, veterinarians, and designated County staff.

2. Veterinarians & Other Authorized Registrars
a. Process license sales and vaccination reports from other sources (i.e. the local animal shelter, veterinary clinics, pet stores, etc.)
b. Assist County staff to ensure reasonable quantities of on-site of basic supplies (reporting forms, citizen mailing envelopes, etc.) necessary to sell license tags and/or report information on citizens vaccinating their animals against rabies.

3. Animal License Tags
a. Process and mail county-provided license tags within a maximum of 10 business days, with a turnaround goal of 5 business days, after receipt of payment and completed information as required by the local ordinance. b. Issue county-provided replacement tags to pet owners whose license tags have been lost, stolen, or damaged.

4. Electronic Payments & Banking
a. Provide the ability for pet owners to pay through the Contractor’s Merchant Service Provider.
b. Provide on-line customer service via the Contractor’s website to allow pet owners to make license payments or donations.
c. Deposit all receipts collected for licensing into a bank account set up solely for the purpose of managing County animal licensing funds.
i. Make daily deposits and transmit verification of said deposits to designated County staff by the tenth of the following month.
ii. Collect and report electronic and charge card payments and transmit verification of said deposits to designated County staff by the tenth of the following month.
iii. Send all funds collected and deposited on behalf of the County via a monthly wire transfer by the tenth of the following month.

6.b
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

d. Accept license fees from licensees via the following forms of payment at a minimum: check, money order, debit or ATM Card, or credit cards. i. Charges to Licensee for on-line payments:

Cost Recovery Processing Fees in the amount of $2.00 per on-line transaction to be charged to licensee*. Note: Contractor shall use their own designated Merchant Service Provider to conduct all credit card transactions and shall retain the Cost Recovery Processing Fees collected.
* More than one pet can be licensed per on-line transaction and pet owner will be charged a single fee for the on-line transaction.

5. Communication & Access
a. Provide timely responses to and communication with citizens, County designees, and Animal Control and Licensing Program representatives including Animal Control Officers.
b. Provide a customized San Mateo County toll-free number and answering service.
c. Provide 24/7 access to Contractor’s database by County, Emergency Dispatch, and any other authorized Division personnel, including login. d. Communicate to pet owners on the status of their pet’s license status including annual billing.

6. Reporting
a. Provide monthly report of animals licensed to the County. b. Provide statistical reports as requested by the County. c. Provide monthly report of all veterinarians who are delinquent in submitting their monthly vaccination without license (VWL) reports.
d. Provide monthly lists of delinquent licenses upon requested by County. e. Provide customized reports as requested by County.
f. Provide public record information as requested by County.

7. Additional Services
a. Work in partnership with County staff:
i. To ensure all licensing information, both complete and incomplete records, are imported into Contractor’s database on a weekly basis. ii. To develop a process that will allow/entice veterinarians to sell licenses at their County location.

B. Contractor agrees that the animal licensing information belongs to the County and will never sell, transfer, or release personal data to a third party.

C. With the exception of the license tags and/or customized inserts, Contractor agrees to cover the cost of all animal licensing supplies needed for daily operation.

D. Contractor agrees to comply with California state and local laws governing animal licensing.

E. Contractor will back up all databases twice during the working day.

F. During regular business hours, Contractor will assist with countywide efforts to reunite pets with their owners during a natural disaster.

County agrees to provide the following to Contractor:

A. Access to County’s animal control database to allow import of data into Contractor’s database.

6.b
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

B. Licensing tags and customized inserts to Contractor’s on-site location for disbursement.

C. Any licensing fees collected by County: such fees will be retained by County, and a record of fees collected along with any supporting documents will be forwarded to the Contractor for processing no later than the 5th calendar day of the following month.

D. Any licensing fees collected by Contractors of the County: such fees and any supporting documents will be forwarded to the Contractor for processing with the exception of cash.

Cash will be deposited into County’s bank account directly by County staff.

6.b
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

Exhibit B
In consideration of the services provided by Contractor described in Exhibit A and subject to the terms of the Agreement, County shall pay Contractor based on the following fee schedule and terms:

A. Fixed Fees:

One-year license: $4.28 per license
Multi-year license: $4.28 for the first year and $2.00 for each additional year Late fees collected: $2.50 collection service fee for each license Replacement tags: $4.28 per tag
Service animals (e.g. seeing-eye dogs, hearing dogs, etc.): No fee for any license or tag issued
Fixed fees shall be payable to Contractor for all licenses processed during the term of this Agreement, regardless of whether they are processed by Contractor, County personnel, or a County contractor.

Fixed fees shall not be charged until the license is issued. Data entry of rabies vaccination certificates and incomplete licenses, which may or may not result in a license, are included at no extra charge.

An agreed upon method to follow-up with pet owners who did not respond to a prior notice is included at no additional charge.

B. In any event, the maximum amount the County shall be obligated to pay for services rendered under this Agreement shall not exceed SIX HUNDRED-THIRTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE DOLLARS ($613,945.00) (Included are bank fees)for the Agreement term.

C. Payment by County to Contractor shall be monthly and made be made electronically by the County should the required paperwork be completely by Contractor. Contractor shall bill County on or before the tenth (10th) working day of each month for the prior month. The invoice shall include a summary of services and charges for the month of service. In addition, Contractor shall provide back-up to the invoice. Such back-up shall be in the form of a monthly report of the animals licensed.

Contractor will provide available bank statements within five business days if requested by County.

D. Additional Service Fees
Contractor shall invoice County for any bank deposit and supply fees outside the scope of this Agreement.

County will reimburse Contractor for bank fees upon verification of such, including:

1. Actual bank fees charged to Contractor as a result of Contractor maintaining the bank account for the purpose of providing services outlined in this contract. This amount, in and of itself, is included in the total contract amount and will not exceed SEVEN THOUSAND AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($7,050.00) (included in the contracted costs) without prior authorization from designated County staff.

2. Non-sufficient fee charge charged to Contractor. Contractor will make every attempt to collect bank fees from pet owners and will reimburse County upon collection of said fee.

6.b
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Template Version November 16, 2016

Contractor shall invoice County on a monthly basis for the actual cost of the bank account maintained for the purpose of this contract.

E. At the discretion of the Director of Public Health, Policy & Planning or designee, an annual conference call may be scheduled between the Contractor and County. Contractor’s time and/or related expenses are not billable.

F. At the discretion of the Director of Public Health, Policy & Planning or designee, a meeting at the County’s location may be scheduled between the Contractor and County once during the term of this contract. Contractor’s travel time to and from the County and/or related expenses are not billable.

G. If County or Contractor finds that performance is inadequate, at the County’s discretion, a meeting may be called to discuss the causes for the performance problem, and this Agreement may be renegotiated, allowed to continue to end of term, or terminated pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. Any unspent monies due to performance failure may reduce the following year’s agreement, if any.

H. In the event this Agreement is terminated prior to June 30, 2022, Contractor shall be paid for services already provided pursuant to this Agreement.

I. In the event this Agreement is extended or renewed after June 30, 2022 and the County does not issue a Request for Proposal, Contractor agrees to continue the fixed fees as shown below:

One-year license: $4.28 per license
Multi-year license: $4.28 for the first year and $2.00 for each additional year Late fees collected: $2.50 collection service fee for each license Replacement tags: $4.28 per tag
Service animals (e.g. seeing-eye dogs, hearing dogs, etc.): No fee for any license or tag issued

6.b
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Michael P. Callagy
County Manager/
Clerk of the Board
County Government Center
400 County Center, 1st Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
650-363-4121 T
650-363-1916 F
www.smcgov.org
July 7, 2020
Robert Barron, Finance Director
91 Ashfield Road
Atherton, CA 94027
Re: Notice of Construction Costs for the Animal Care Shelter Facility Dear Robert,
On or about September 9, 2014, the municipalities within San Mateo County entered into an agreement (“the Agreement”) to share the construction costs of a new animal care shelter facility. The agreement provides that the County of San Mateo will advance the funds for construction to be repaid by the municipalities according to their share, through a 30-year, interest-free lease agreement.

On March 6, 2020, construction of the new animal shelter building was completed, and certificate of occupancy was issued. The old shelter building was demolished shortly thereafter, and final project completion (with exception of photovoltaic installment) is slated for approximately July 30, 2020. Final project costs are reasonably determinable and anticipated to be approximately $28,300,000. The municipalities’ final shared responsibility is anticipated to be $25,700,000 or $856,758 annually. The County will not seek reimbursement for $2,600,000 in project costs comprised of an upgraded heating ventilation air conditioning ($600,000), a photovoltaic system ($1,200,000), miscellaneous site improvements related to landscaping, fencing, and parking ($530,000), and relocation of a City of Burlingame water line ($270,000).

The final column of Attachment B to this letter sets forth each municipalities’ final annual lease amount, as calculated in the manner proscribed by the Agreement. Final costs exceed the June 2018 estimate by approximately 3%. This marginal increase is a result of escalated regional construction costs and unforeseen circumstances encountered during construction, including requirements for ongoing air-quality monitoring, soil remediation and treatment, fire safety system modifications, PG&E delays, and necessary and reasonable end-user logistical design modifications. The County of San Mateo has worked diligently and successfully to minimize these additional costs while delivering a high-quality facility that will stand the test of time.

6.b
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend Though we had to cancel the ribbon-cutting for the facility due to the pandemic, we look forward to holding, at the appropriate time, a reception to celebrate our successful regional collaboration. In lieu of an in-person tour, we’ve enclosed photographs of the exterior of the new facility and site. Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the Agreement, annual payments to County to reimburse for costs of construction shall become due on the initial July 1st after a certificate of occupancy is issued for the new shelter, and each subsequent July 1st for the next 29 years thereafter. Please find enclosed the invoice and payment instructions for the initial lease payment for your municipality.

Should you have any project questions, please contact Director Adam Ely of the Project Development Unit at 650.722.8112. Should you have any payment questions, please contact Robert Manchia at 650.363.4597.

Sincerely,
Mike Callagy
San Mateo County, County Manager
Enclosures: Resolution 073369, Final Attachment B, Invoice July 2020

6.b
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend

6.b
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend

6.b
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend

6.b
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend

6.b
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend

6.b
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment B: Animal Control Agreement Between San Mateo County and Cities 2021-2026 (6181 : Amendment to Extend FY 2025-26 ANIMAL CONTROL COSTS
25-26 Year Control rev
less control & licensing
exp less licensing rev
CY 2024 licensing
revenue
TOTAL OF AC&L Rev
less exp
$6,284,982 $1,085,911 $7,370,893
CITY Service Level Service Level Service Level Estimated Estimated CY 2024 Licensing Revenue Adjusted Percentage Percentage Percentage 2025-2026 2025-26
Distribution 2025-2026 City Cost
CY 2022 Actual CY 2023 Actual CY 2024 Actual
Before subtracting license
revenue % of total revenue
Licensing Revenue
Collected
Atherton 0.77% 1.05% 0.94% 0.92% $67,896 1.25% $ 13,611 $54,286 Belmont 3.14% 3.04% 2.79% 2.99% $220,251 4.47% $ 48,579 $171,673 Brisbane 0.63% 0.58% 0.73% 0.65% $47,594 0.77% $ 8,408 $39,187 Burlingame 3.95% 3.95% 3.96% 3.95% $291,238 4.89% $ 53,136 $238,102 Colma 0.49% 0.38% 0.34% 0.40% $29,726 0.16% $ 1,704 $28,022 Daly City 9.27% 9.68% 9.66% 9.54% $702,859 7.45% $ 80,878 $621,982 East Palo Alto 8.17% 9.68% 8.16% 8.67% $639,082 1.07% $ 11,650 $627,432 Foster City 3.29% 2.74% 2.85% 2.96% $218,217 3.71% $ 40,275 $177,942 Half Moon Bay 1.87% 1.96% 1.78% 1.87% $137,713 2.60% $ 28,190 $109,524 Hillsborough 1.11% 1.05% 1.21% 1.13% $82,930 2.48% $ 26,891 $56,040 Menlo Park 4.75% 5.11% 5.50% 5.12% $377,419 3.87% $ 42,035 $335,384 Millbrae 2.46% 2.05% 2.07% 2.19% $161,570 2.83% $ 30,727 $130,843 Pacifica 4.67% 4.16% 4.43% 4.42% $325,968 8.17% $ 88,768 $237,201 Portola Valley 0.48% 0.49% 0.57% 0.51% $37,628 1.42% $ 15,394 $22,234 Redwood City 13.15% 12.19% 11.83% 12.39% $913,307 12.16% $ 132,077 $781,230 San Bruno 5.19% 5.28% 5.60% 5.36% $394,860 5.50% $ 59,771 $335,090 San Carlos 3.22% 2.80% 2.94% 2.98% $219,930 5.23% $ 56,819 $163,112 San Mateo 14.06% 15.03% 15.19% 14.76% $1,087,992 15.35% $ 166,726 $921,267 S. San Francisco 9.15% 8.62% 8.41% 8.73% $643,178 7.70% $ 83,594 $559,585 Woodside 1.05% 1.02% 1.10% 1.06% $77,856 1.37% $ 14,845 $63,012 County 9.14% 9.14% 9.96% 9.41% $693,680 7.54% $ 81,840 $611,840 Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% $7,370,894 100.00% $1,085,911 $6,284,983 FY 2025-26 Animal Control Costs -
calculating Field @ 41% & Shelter @ 59% over 3 years and using past calendar year license revenue per city

6.c
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment C: FY 25-26 Allocation of Animal Control Costs to Cities (6181 : Amendment to Extend Agreement for

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
4/13/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Award of Construction Contract for the Esplanade Full Trash Capture Device Project RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt the Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pacifica Approving the Construction Services Agreement with GSW Construction, Inc. in the amount of $1,104,580.00; Authorize a budget authority in the amount of $1,270,267.00, which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fourteen percent (15%) of the Construction Contract amounts; Authorize staff to Execute Future Change Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and Authorize the City Manager to sign Contract Documents related to the Esplanade Full Trash Capture Device Project.

STAFF CONTACT:

Rey Soriano, Assistant Civil Engineer
(650) 676-5608
[email protected]
Roland Yip, P.E., DPW Deputy Director/City Engineer
(650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Melissa Tigbao, P.E., DPW Director
(650) 501-6016
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Pacifica and Caltrans staff, with support from the San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Program and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, had discussions on the development of a cooperative agreement under the 2020 Funding Contribution Only (FCO) program for a full trash capture stormwater project. The City of Pacifica entered into a Cooperative Agreement for Stormwater Mitigation with Caltrans on January 11, 2024 based on Council approved Resolution 01-2020 that allows the City Manager to sign Caltrans funding agreements and is requested by Caltrans to allow for efficient management of their agreements.

Under this agreement, the City of Pacifica will undertake the design and construction of the proposed Full Trash Capture (FTC) device within its jurisdiction. Caltrans will contribute $1,440,000 from the State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) funds to reimburse the City for the project.

On August 24, 2024, the City Council approved a Consultant Services Agreement with Schaaf & Wheeler for design and engineering services related to the project. The design aims to mitigate stormwater pollutants from Caltrans Significant Trash Generation Areas to improve regional stormwater quality. Caltrans and the City must comply with the Statewide National Pollutant 7 Packet Pg. 278
Pacifica City Council 2
April 13, 2026
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, which requires implementation of control measures to reduce stormwater pollutants. The project will install a stormwater cleaning device called a Hydrodynamic separator along the storm drain line that receives flow from a total tributary area of 31.4 acres, which includes runoff from Caltrans roadways and impervious surfaces. The Hydrodynamic Separator will be installed on Esplanade Avenue at Bill Drake Way to clean the stormwater traveling through a 51” storm drain line on Esplanade Avenue that outfalls at 500 block of Esplanade Avenue. The project plans are available to view on the City's website at: <https://www.cityofpacifica.org/departments/public-works/engineering/capitalimprovement-projects/esplanade-full-trash-capture-device-project> The project was advertised on February 26, 2026, and March 5, 2026, in accordance with the formal bid process. Thirty-Nine (39) companies downloaded plans and specifications, and eight (8) companies submitted bids. On March 25, 2026, the bid opening was held via Zoom by the City Clerk, and the result is as follows:

Company Bid
GSW Construction Inc. $1,104,580.00
JDB and Sons Construction, Inc. $1,114,440.00
K.J. Woods Construction Inc. $1,188,000.00
Ranger Pipelines Inc. $1,191,650.00
Marinship Development Interest LLC $1,225,449.00
Devaney Engineering, Inc. $1,333,000.00
JMB Construction Inc. $1,373,050.00
W.R. Forde Associates, Inc. $1,667,200.00
The apparent low bidder is GSW Construction, Inc. with a base bid amount of $1,104,580.00, which is slightly below the Engineer’s Estimate. All required documentation was submitted with their bid. GSW Construction, Inc. has not previously performed construction work for the City of Pacifica. Staff conducted reference checks and confirmed that the contractor has successfully completed a similar project for the City of Hayward. As part of this effort, staff also consulted with the City’s design consultant, Schaaf & Wheeler, who has direct experience working with GSW Construction, Inc. on similar projects for other agencies and provided positive feedback based on their successful performance. Based on these references, staff have determined GSW Construction, Inc. to be a responsive and responsible bidder.

As there are sufficient project funds from Caltrans SHOPP Fund and NPDES Fund 216, the Interim City Manager recommends the award of contract to the apparent low bidder, GSW Construction Inc. In addition, a 15% contingency is recommended to allow enough funding to handle any unforeseen conditions and/or additional work that are identified during construction and authorizing a budget authority for construction in the amount of $1,270,267.00.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to adopt the resolution and not approve the construction contract.

However, this will result in project delays and possible increase in construction costs. Staff does not recommend this alternative action.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:
7 Packet Pg. 279
Pacifica City Council 3
April 13, 2026
Approval of the consultant contract is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
• Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets and facilities: Approval of this action will improve the trash capture in the City’s stormwater infrastructure.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The following is the source and use of funds for the project:

Total Project Source and Use of Funds
Caltrans SHOPP $1,440,000
NPDES Fund 216 $15,650.00
Total Source of Funds $1,455,650
Esplanade Full Trash Capture Device Project
Design & Engineering $185,383
Construction Contract $1,104,580
Construction Contingency, 15% $165,687
Total Use of Funds $1,455,650
The City has signed a cooperative agreement with Caltrans where Caltrans will contribute $1,440,000 to the City of Pacifica from the SHOPP fund for the design and construction of the project.

ORIGINATED BY:

Public Works
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment A - GSW Construction Esplanade Full Trash Capture Agreement - Signed (PDF) 7 Packet Pg. 280
Pacifica City Council 4
April 13, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH GSW CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,104,580.00; AUTHORIZE A BUDGET AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,270,267.00, WHICH INCLUDES CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED FOURTEEN PERCENT (15%) OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AMOUNTS;

AUTHORIZE STAFF TO EXECUTE FUTURE CHANGE ORDERS NOT TO EXCEED THE CONTINGENCY AMOUNT; AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN CONTRACT

DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE ESPLANADE FULL TRASH CAPTURE DEVICE PROJECT WHEREAS, consistent with the City of Pacifica’s Bidding Procedures for Public Projects (Municipal Code Title 3 Chapter 15) the City of Pacifica advertised the Request for Bids Esplanade Full Trash Capture Project on February 26, 2026, and March 5, 2026; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 2026, the bid opening was held by the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the lowest responsive bidder was GSW Construction, Inc.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica authorizes the Construction Services Agreement between the City of Pacifica and GSW Construction, Inc. for the Esplanade Full Trash Capture Project in an amount not to exceed $1,104,580.00; authorizes a budget authority in the amount of $1,254,617.00 which includes contingencies in an amount not to exceed fourteen (14%) of the Construction Contract amounts; authorizes staff to Execute Future Change Orders and Task Orders not to exceed the contingency amount; and authorizes the City Manager to sign Contract Documents to the Project.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 13th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 7 Packet Pg. 281

7.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment A - GSW Construction Esplanade Full Trash Capture Agreement - Signed (6179 : Award Esplanade Full Trash Capture

7.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment A - GSW Construction Esplanade Full Trash Capture Agreement - Signed (6179 : Award Esplanade Full Trash Capture

7.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment A - GSW Construction Esplanade Full Trash Capture Agreement - Signed (6179 : Award Esplanade Full Trash Capture

7.a
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment A - GSW Construction Esplanade Full Trash Capture Agreement - Signed (6179 : Award Esplanade Full Trash Capture

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
4/13/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt the Resolution Approving the Consultant Services Agreement with NCE for Design and Engineering Services in the amount of $201,600 for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project; approve budget authority in the amount of $222,000 which includes a 10% contingency and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project.

STAFF CONTACT:

Roland Yip, P.E., Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer (650) 738-3771
[email protected]
Melissa Tigbao, P.E., Director of Public Works
(650) 738-3770
[email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

The City of Pacifica is responsible for maintaining over 90 centerline miles of street pavement.

In order to complete this street maintenance, the City identifies a budget every year for annual street maintenance projects as part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It is important for the City to complete the annual street maintenance projects each year to prevent City streets from falling into more expensive repair categories. One year missed in completing the City’s annual street maintenance projects can escalate the decline of the City’s overall Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and increase the ongoing cost of maintenance.

At the July 8th, 2024 City Council meeting, Council approved the new 5-year Street Maintenance Program with identified streets for rehabilitation and resurfacing. The goal of the 5-year Street Maintenance program is to prevent streets from falling into more expensive repair categories. The City’s approved program does this by using slurry seal treatments to keep good streets in the good condition category (which is the least expensive way to maintain streets and considered best practice) and using a stopgap cape seal treatment on suitable residential and collector streets in the poorer condition categories. The cape seal, along with localized pavement repairs, will provide significant protection to the street surface of these poorer condition category streets for a period of seven to ten years preventing further deterioration of the street surface. This will allow time for the City to identify other pavement funding sources for street rehabilitation. In addition to slurry seal and cape seal treatments, the program will continue to assign overlay and reconstruction treatments to a limited number of collector and residential streets based on the extent of pavement deterioration and/or traffic volumes. The FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project will resurface various street segments in the Sharp Park neighborhood in Pacifica. See Attachment 2 for a map and 8 Packet Pg. 286
Pacifica City Council 2
April 13, 2026
complete list.

Due to the condition of the City’s pavement, it is necessary to choose a consultant who is knowledgeable in specialized pavement design and rehabilitation for the cost-effective stop gap pavement treatments. Therefore, staff from the Engineering Division issued a Request for Proposal for the Design and Engineering Services related to the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project. Eight (8) companies on the approved Qualified On-call Consultant list for Civil Engineering were invited to participate and three (3) companies submitted proposals.

1. CSG Consultants, Inc.

2. NCE

3. Wilsey Ham
Consultant proposal evaluations were conducted by staff from the Engineering Division. The proposals were scored based upon the consultants’ quality of proposal and responses to specific questions included in the RFP, experience of the proposer conducting similar work in California, relevant qualifications of key personnel assigned to this project, accessibility of key personnel to the City’s staff during the project, understanding of the City’s objectives and reasonableness of fees and cost proposal.

Based upon the above criteria, NCE was selected by staff to proceed with the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project. The cost estimate for the project is $201,600. Staff recommends including a 10% contingency for any additional or unforeseen work needed.

NCE has been working in the Bay Area since 1990 and is highly regarded for their expertise in pavement design and rehabilitation, for their work with the pavement research branch of the Federal Highways Administration and for their work with the various pavement resurfacing projects throughout San Mateo County and northern California. NCE has completed several City projects in the past, and their work has been satisfactory.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

Council may choose not to authorize design and engineering of the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project. However, this will result in continued deterioration of the City’s pavement network. Staff does not recommend this alternate action.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

Approval of the Master Agreement and Task Order is consistent with the following Council adopted Goals:
· Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets and facilities: The FY 2027- 28 Pavement Resurfacing Project will improve various city streets in Pacifica.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The current appropriation request is $201,600 for the contract, plus 10% contingency, for a grand total of $222,000. To be funded by Measure A revenues from Fund 209.

With the adoption of the FY 25/26 to FY 29/30 5-year Street Maintenance Program, $2.2M of yearly funding was identified as a combination of SB1, Measure A and W, and the City’s heavy vehicle impact fees and pavement cut fees. The City will review the actual FY 26/27 year funding structure during the annual CIP budget process. 8 Packet Pg. 287
Pacifica City Council 3
April 13, 2026
ORIGINATED BY:

Engineering
ATTACHMENT LIST:

FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (PDF)
FY 2027-28 Resurfacing List (PDF)
8 Packet Pg. 288
Pacifica City Council 4
April 13, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. _______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA APPROVING THE

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PACIFICA AND NCE FOR DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $201,600 FOR THE FY 2027-28 PAVEMENT RESURFACING PROJECT; APPROVE BUDGET AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $222,000 WHICH INCLUDES CONTINGENCIES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 10% AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS

RELATED TO THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City desires to move forward with the design and engineering of the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project using a portion of funds allocated to street maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposal for the Design and Engineering Services related to the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project; and WHEREAS, the City evaluated proposal from three companies, and selected NCE to complete the work and have been satisfied with their services on past City projects; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services with NCE for design and engineering services in the amount of $201,600 for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project and approve a budget authority in the amount of $222,000 that includes a contingency of 10% and authorize the City Manager to execute all documents related to the project.
• • • • •
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 13th day of April 2026, by the following vote:

AYES, Councilmembers:

NOES, Councilmembers:

ABSENT, Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN, Councilmembers:
_________________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ _________________________________ 8 Packet Pg. 289
Pacifica City Council 5
April 13, 2026
Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Kenyon, City Attorney 8 Packet Pg. 290
4866-2656-6648 v1 - 1 -

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
This Agreement for Consultant Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into this 13th day of April, 2026, by and between THE CITY OF PACIFICA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and NCE (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT").

CITY and CONSULTANT may be referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY requires services in connection with the City Council strategic planning facilitation;
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform such services; and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has agreed to provide CITY with such services on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, for the considerations hereinafter set forth, CONSULTANT and CITY agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 - SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.1. Scope of Work. CONSULTANT agrees to furnish the services set forth in Exhibit A, Scope of Work, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Services").

1.2. Compliance with Law. The Services shall be performed in accordance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations and orders.

1.3. Time is of the Essence. CONSULTANT agrees to diligently prosecute the Services. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence.

1.4. Professional Competence. CONSULTANT represents that it has the professional skills necessary to perform the Services and that it will perform the Services in a skillful and professional manner. CONSULTANT represents that it has all the necessary licenses to perform the Services and shall maintain them throughout the term of this Agreement.

CONSULTANT agrees that the Services shall be performed consistent with the professional skill and care ordinarily provided by practicing in the same or similar locality under the same or similar circumstances. CITY and CONSULTANT agree that CONSULTANT is in responsible charge of the Services. Acceptance by CITY of the Services does not operate as a release of CONSULTANT from professional responsibility for the Services performed.

1.5. Independent Contractor. CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of CITY. CONSULTANT expressly warrants that it will not represent that it is an employee of CITY.

8.a
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 2 -

1.6. Confidentiality. CONSULTANT agrees to maintain in confidence and not disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation, without CITY's prior written consent, any trade secret or confidential information, knowledge or data relating to the products, process, or operation of CITY. CONSULTANT further agrees to maintain in confidence and not to disclose to any person, firm, governmental entity, or corporation any data, information, technology, or material developed or obtained by CONSULTANT during the performance of the Services. The covenants contained in this Section 1.6 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause.

1.7. Ownership of Material. Any reports and other material prepared by or on behalf of CONSULTANT under this Agreement (collectively, the "Documents") and provided to the CITY shall be and remain the property of CITY. All Documents not already provided to CITY shall be delivered to CITY on the date of termination of this Agreement for any reason. The Documents may be used by CITY and its agents, employees, representatives, and assigns, in whole or in part, or in modified form, for all purposes CITY may deem appropriate without further employment of or payment of any compensation to CONSULTANT.

1.8. Documentation. CONSULTANT shall keep and maintain full and complete documentation and accounting records, employee time sheets, and correspondence pertaining to the performance of the Services, and CONSULTANT shall make such documents available for review and/or audit by CITY and CITY's representatives at all reasonable times for at least four years after the termination of this Agreement or completion of the Services.

1.9. Testimony. CONSULTANT agrees to testify at CITY's request if litigation is brought against CITY in connection with the Services. Unless the action is brought by CONSULTANT or is based upon CONSULTANT's negligence, CITY will compensate CONSULTANT for the preparation and the testimony at CONSULTANT's standard hourly rates.

ARTICLE 2 - COMPENSATION

2.1. Compensation. Compensation for the Services shall be in accordance with Exhibit B, Compensation, attached hereto and incorporated herein. It is agreed that the compensation for the Services shall not exceed $201,600 ("Cost Ceiling").

2.2. Invoices. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices in a form satisfactory to CITY on or before the tenth day of each month for Services provided during the preceding month. CONSULTANT shall submit time and cost records as necessary to substantiate performance of the Services. Within 35 days after receipt of each such invoice, CITY shall verify the accuracy of the invoice, correct the charges where appropriate and as discussed and mutually agreed with CONSULTANT, and make payment to CONSULTANT in an amount equal to the amount of such invoice, as verified or corrected by CITY. No payment hereunder shall be construed as evidence of acceptance of any of CONSULTANT's work. CITY reserves the right to withhold payment from CONSULTANT on account of Services not performed satisfactorily, delays in

8.a
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 3 -
CONSULTANT's performance of Services, or other defaults hereunder. CONSULTANT shall not stop or delay performance of the Services under this Agreement on account of payment disputes with CITY.

2.3. Status Reports. Together with each monthly invoice, CONSULTANT shall submit a status report detailing the amount expended on the Services to that date and the remaining amount to be expended before the Cost Ceiling is reached. CONSULTANT shall notify CITY in writing when payments have reached 90 percent of the Cost Ceiling.

2.4. Withholding. In lieu of holding retention, CITY shall withhold CONSULTANT's final payment until the Services are complete and CITY has received all Documents.

CONSULTANT shall diligently continue and complete performance of the Services if the Services are not complete at the time CONSULTANT has performed services up to the Cost Ceiling.

ARTICLE 3 - TIME OF PERFORMANCE

3.1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective upon execution of the second signature and shall remain in full force and effect until the Services are completed (the "Term"). CONSULTANT agrees to complete all services by December 31, 2027.

3.2. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by CITY upon written notice to CONSULTANT.

3.3. Final Payment. CONSULTANT shall be entitled to compensation for Services performed up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for the Services rendered under this Agreement.

3.4. Other Remedies. Nothing in this Article 3 shall be deemed to limit the respective rights of the parties to terminate this Agreement for cause or otherwise to exercise any rights or pursue any remedies which may accrue to them.

ARTICLE 4 - DESIGNATED CONTACTS

4.1. CITY Contact. CITY designates Roland Yip, PE, DPW Deputy Director/City Engineer, as its contact who shall be responsible for administering and interpreting the terms and conditions of this Agreement, for matters relating to CONSULTANT's performance under this Agreement, and for liaison and coordination between CITY and CONSULTANT. In the event CITY wishes to make a change in CITY 's representative, CITY will notify CONSULTANT of the change in writing.

4.2. CONSULTANT Contact. CONSULTANT designates J. Ryan Shafer, Principal as its contact, who shall have immediate responsibility for the performance of the Services and for all matters relating to performance under this Agreement. Any change in CONSULTANT's designated contact shall be subject to written approval by CITY.

ARTICLE 5 - INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

8.a
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 4 -

5.1. Indemnification. Indemnification. CONSULTANT shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's and expert witness fees, awards, fines, penalties, or judgments, arising out of or relating to the Services (collectively "Claims") that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of CONSULTANT, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its Officials, officers, employees and agents (the "CITY Parties"), except to the extent the Claims are attributable to CITY Parties' gross negligence or willful misconduct. CONSULTANT shall defend the CITY Parties as required by California Civil Code Section 2778, and with counsel reasonably acceptable to those parties. CONSULTANT shall have no right to seek reimbursement from the CITY Parties for the costs of defense except as allowed by law pursuant to Civil Code section 2782.8. The obligations contained in this Section 5.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause for the full period of time allowed by law and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance requirements of this Agreement.

To the extent that CONSULTANT, is a design professional, as that term is defined in Civil Code section 2782.8(c)(3), the Consultant shall, to the fullest extent allowed by law, with respect to claims, liability, loss, damage, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s and expert witness fees, awards, fines, penalties, or judgments (collectively “Claims”), defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officials, officers, employees and agents (“CITY Parties”) from those Claims that are caused by the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

However, notwithstanding the previous sentence, in the event one or more defendants is unable to pay its share of defense costs due to bankruptcy or dissolution of the business, the Consultant shall meet and confer with other parties regarding unpaid defense costs.

The obligations contained in this Section 5.1 shall survive the termination of this Agreement for whatever cause for the full period of time allowed by law and shall not in any way be limited by the insurance requirements of this Agreement.

5.2. Health and Safety. CONSULTANT may perform part of the Services at sites which contain unknown working conditions and contaminated materials. CONSULTANT shall be solely responsible for the health and safety of CONSULTANT's employees during the performance of the Services.

5.3. Insurance. CONSULTANT and all of CONSULTANTS employees, subcontractors, consultants and other agency shall procure, provide and maintain at all times during the performance of this Agreement, and for such additional periods as described herein, the insurance listed below with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a Best's rating of no less than A:VII.

A. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance providing bodily injury liability and property damage, to protect against all liability arising out of the use of any owned, leased, passenger or commercial automobile at a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit and $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall apply to hired and non-owned autos.

8.a
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 5 -
B. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with limits providing a minimum amount of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage for each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products/completed operations aggregate. The insurance shall cover all operations including but not limited to the following: (1) premises, operations and mobile equipment liability; (2) completed operations and products liability; (3) contractual liability insuring the obligations assumed by CONSULTANT in this Agreement; (4) broad form property damage liability; (5) personal injury liability endorsement, including death; and (6) automobile bodily injury and property damage insurance, including all owned, hired and non-owned equipment.

C. Workers Compensation Insurance. Workers Compensation insurance, occupational disease insurance and employer’s liability insurance shall be required with minimum limits as required by law, covering all workplaces involved in this Agreement.

D. Policy Terms. Concurrently with execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with Certificates of Insurance evidencing that CONSULTANT has obtained or maintains the insurance required by this Section

5.3. The Certificates shall be on forms acceptable to CITY. CONSULTANT shall also furnish CITY with original endorsements with the following documentation:
• Precluding cancellation or reduction in coverage before the expiration of thirty (30) days after CITY shall have received written notification thereof from CONSULTANT by United States mail;
• Providing that CONSULTANT's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, and include a “separation of insureds” or “severability” clause which treats each insured separately, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability (cross-liability endorsement);
• Excepting CONSULTANT’S professional liability insurance, naming CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents as additional insureds (“Additional Insureds”); and • Providing that for any claims relating to CONSULTANT's services hereunder, CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to CITY, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents, and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by CITY for itself, its City Council, boards, commissions, committees, officers, employees and agents shall be in excess of CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not be contributory with it.
• It shall be a requirement under this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverages requirements and/or limits shall be available to the Additional Insured, including but not limited to any umbrella or excess insurance.

Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be the greater of:
(a) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Agreement; or (b) the

8.a
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 6 -
broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured.

E. Material Breach. If CONSULTANT fails to maintain insurance coverage or provided insurance documentation which is required pursuant to this Agreement, it shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement. CITY, at its sole option, may terminate this Agreement and obtain damages from CONSULTANT resulting from said breach. Alternatively, CITY may purchase the required insurance coverage, and without further notice to CONSULTANT, may deduct from sums due to CONSULTANT any premium costs advanced by CITY for such insurance. These remedies shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY.

ARTICLE 6 - NOTICES
All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered or sent by facsimile or reputable overnight courier and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of: (1) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice; (2) if delivered by Federal Express or other overnight courier for next business day delivery, the next business day; (3) if sent by facsimile, with the original sent on the same day by overnight courier, the date on which the facsimile is received, provided it is before 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time; or (4) if sent electronically, the date of delivery on the confirmed read receipt. Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner described in this Article 6. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of a change in address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice or communication sent. Unless changed in accordance herewith, the addresses for notices given pursuant to this Agreement shall be as follows:

If to CITY: Yulia Carter, Interim City Manager
170 Santa Maria Avenue
Pacifica, CA 94404
Phone: (650) 738-7409
Email: [email protected]
If to CONSULTANT: J. Ryan Shafer
1003 W. Cutting Blvd, Suite 110
Point Richmond, CA 94804
Phone: (510) 215-3620
Email: [email protected]

8.a
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 7 -
ARTICLE 7 - MISCELLANEOUS

7.1. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of CITY and CONSULTANT as to those matters contained herein. No prior oral or written understanding shall be of any force or effect with respect to those matters covered hereunder. This Agreement may only be modified by an amendment in writing signed by each party.

7.2. No Assignment. The Services are deemed unique and neither party shall assign, transfer, subcontract or otherwise substitute its interest in this Agreement or any of its obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of the other party. As limited by this Section

7.2, this Agreement is to be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.

7.3. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is determined to be unconstitutional, invalid or beyond the authority of either party, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement can be interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the parties.

7.4. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts and, when fully signed, such counterparts shall have the same effect as if signed in one document.

7.5. Choice of Law. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without reference to its choice of laws principles and venue shall be in the appropriate court in San Mateo County, California.

7.6. Waiver. No failure on the part of either Party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder. A waiver by either CITY or CONSULTANT of any breach of this Agreement shall not be binding upon the waiving party unless such waiver is in writing. In the event of a written waiver, such a waiver shall not affect the waiving party's rights with respect to any other further breach.

7.7. Mediation. In the event the parties are unable to resolve a dispute arising under this Agreement through good faith negotiations, the parties agree to submit the matter to mediation with a mutually agreeable mediator. Prior to the mediation, the parties shall exchange any documents reasonably necessary to resolve the matter to be mediated.

Interpretation. In the event this Agreement is ever construed in any dispute between the parties, it and each of its provisions shall be construed without regard to the party or parties responsible for its preparation and shall be deemed to have been prepared jointly by the parties.

The rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement.

7.8. Authority. Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of one of the parties represents that he or she is duly authorized to sign and deliver the Agreement on behalf of such party and that this Agreement is binding on such party in accordance with its terms.

8.a
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 8 -

7.9. Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create a contractual relationship with, or cause of action in favor of, a third party against either the CITY or CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT’s Services hereunder are being performed solely for the benefit of CITY.

7.11 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including Exhibits A, B and B1 comprise the entire Agreement.
[Signature on Next Page]

8.a
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866-2656-6648 v1 - 9 -

7.10. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth above.

CITY OF PACIFICA
By:_________________________________________
Yulia Carter, Interim City Manager
Date:________________________________________
Approved As To Form
By:_________________________________________
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney
Date:________________________________________

CONSULTANT
By:_________________________________________
Ryan Shafer, NCE
Date:________________________________________ April 7, 2026

8.a
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF WORK

8.a
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project Page | 1

2. Proposal Statement of Understanding and Approach The City would now plans to complete the FY 2027/28 Pavement Resurfacing Project with a total construction cost of approximately $1.8 million, not including design, construction management or construction contingency. We understand that the City would like to begin the design and complete construction documents for early bidding by December 2026 and begin construction in Summer 2027. Two (2) separate packages will be prepared: one for concrete improvements and one for pavement resurfacing. Some streets in the FY2027/28 package require surface reconstruction or rehabilitation. We will first complete coring on these to confirm if more costly rehabilitation and/or surface reconstruct is required based on pavement layer thicknesses, subgrade materials, and constructability (e.g. problematic subgrade that might require stabilization or avoidance if possible). If we confirm rehabilitation or surface reconstruct are required, we would discuss this further with the City on approaches as surface seal contractors will mark-up asphalt concrete paving work increasing the cost and can be selective in taking on this work with a lengthened schedule. In addition, topographic surveys on selected curb ramp locations on areas with steep slopes, complex grading conditions or potential drainage issues are also listed as an optional task in the scope. We conducted a field review in February 2026 to verify the proposed pavement treatments and identify potential challenges associated with this project. The map exhibit below highlights selected examples of our field observations, including pavement distress conditions, concrete repairs, drainage concern, and site constraints that may affect constructability and final treatment recommendations.

8.a
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project Page | 2
Scope of Work
Task 1 – Project Management & Meetings
1A) Project Kick-off Meeting/Progress Meetings
NCE’s Project Manager will arrange a Kick-Off Meeting with the City to initiate work on the project. The objectives of the Kick-Off Meeting will be:
• Review of the Scope of Work
• Establish Lines of Communication
• Confirm Deadlines
• Establish Project Schedule and Milestones
• Define Design and Operation Criteria
Whether taking on a simple preventive maintenance project or a complex reconstruction project, it is critical to establish effective lines of communication with, and coordination amongst, the various stakeholders from the start to ensure the delivery of a highquality project within budget and on schedule.

In addition to City staff (Engineering, Maintenance, etc.), NCE will research and coordinate, as-needed, with other agencies such as PG&E, AT&T, North Coast County Water District, Sewer and Stormwater, Schools, etc., to identify any potential conflicts, requirements, or design issues early to help minimize delays (and costs) later in the design process or during construction. At the Kick-Off Meeting, key deliverables for each Task and the Project Schedule would be reviewed and adjusted accordingly to meet City needs.

NCE is very sensitive to construction costs, particularly the volatile price of materials, which have affected the scope of many similar projects. In order to keep the City aware of overall project costs, NCE will begin developing Preliminary Engineering Cost Estimates as soon as we have developed our engineering design recommendations to closely monitor any potential funding issues. During the course of the project, NCE will be seeking to develop the most appropriate and cost-effective pavement surface seal alternatives as we completed in FY 2020/21 to FY 2026/27 pavement resurfacing program to stay within the planned project budget and schedule. In City’s FY2026/27 Resurfacing Project, our engineering estimate was within 5% of the final bid results.

Throughout the project, NCE staff will be available to attend regularly scheduled progress meetings with the City, to maintain good communications for this project to offer efficiency and reduce the number of design review and coordination meetings. Therefore, we have assumed up to four (4) progress meetings for FY 2027/28 resurfacing project to be included in our scope. The purpose of the progress meetings will be to identify and resolve any design or funding issues that may surface in a timely manner, present design alternatives and recommendations to City staff, and continue coordination with project stakeholders as necessary.

Deliverables
• Kick-off/Progress Meeting Agendas and Minutes
1B) Utility Coordination
NCE will coordinate with utility agencies early in the design process to help avoid potential construction delays and unnecessary disruptions to public services. Utility coordination will be a critical item to keep utility providers informed about the project and schedule. One of the first and earliest items that NCE will complete is sending notification letters to applicable utility providers with a preliminary project schedule for street surface seal and rehabilitation in this project. Early notification will allow utility providers to perform maintenance on their facilities prior to moratorium on the street paving area. NCE will also carefully document all utility coordination notifications, conversations, and meetings with utility contacts and information in a matrix format with dates of contacts and mailing detailed in this matrix. Follow-up calls will be made for each of the above notifications to confirm receipt.

NCE will also keep the City informed of any project delays related to utilities.

Deliverables
• Utility notification letters
Task 2 – Pavement Design
The scope of work we would perform under this task consists of the following:
2A) Pavement and Curb & Gutter Condition Survey
NCE will perform a pavement condition survey of each street. The surveys will generally cover the travel and parking lanes. Pavement condition surveys serve the purpose of further refining the appropriate pavement surface treatments.

8.a
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 3
This condition survey will generally note the presence of load related and environmental distresses, such as alligator cracking, longitudinal and transverse cracking, rutting, patches and utility cuts, distortions and depressions as they pertain to developing appropriate pavement treatments. In addition, potential spot/base repairs will be identified in the condition survey. Our scope of work and condition surveys do not address issues including but not limited to traffic, safety and road hazards, geometric issues, or short-term maintenance that should be performed (i.e. pothole that should be repaired).

A visual assessment of all curb and gutters will be included to identify areas where drainage or the adjacent pavement has been compromised. Our scope will limit repair recommendations to only those sections of curb and gutter that are damaged to the extent that they will affect pavement surface seals, cause ponding water, or tripping hazards (i.e., tree root damage extending into pavement). If damaged curb and gutter areas are more extensive than anticipated, it may require additional time to complete, and we will notify the City if more time is required to complete these surveys.

We assume curb and gutter replacement criteria will remain the same as previous projects. NCE will meet with the City and establish updated condition criteria for assessment and replacement if needed. Based on the criteria established with the City, NCE will then determine what level of curb and gutter replacement will be pursued for design plans and documents. 2B) Pavement Coring
NCE will collect pavement section core samples (4” – 8” diameter cores) on streets for mill and overlay and surface reconstruction treatments. All coring locations will be marked with white paint for utility locations by Underground Service Alert (USA). Our current fee estimate assumes up to 8 core locations (two (2) 4” cores and six (6) 8” bulk samples) that we estimate will take two (2) day to complete. For each core sample, NCE will measure and record the thickness and material type of each layer encountered in the pavement section, including the presence of any pavement reinforcing fabric. We will collect bulk samples of subgrade materials at the core locations for laboratory testing such as R-value, moisture content and Atterberg Limits (plasticity index) determinations. The thickness of aggregate base (AB) will be measured at the bulk sample location.
2C) Pavement Design Recommendations
Based on a combination of existing pavement condition, coring results, construction consideration, and City’s budget, NCE will perform pavement design analysis and design services, and develop pavement preventive maintenance and rehabilitation recommendations for each street section. NCE will next develop recommendations including, but not limited to, the following:
• Slurry Seal or Double Slurry Seal
• Rubber Cape Seal
• Multi-Layer Surface Seal
• Mill and Overlay or Surface Reconstruct
• Locations and treatments of failed pavement sections
(base repairs, spot repairs or skin patches)
NCE will then summarize its recommendations in pavement design tables to the City that, at a minimum, will include street inventory, pavement structure thickness, base repair percentage, and recommended treatments.

NCE will submit the draft pavement design tables to the City for initial review. Upon receipt of any comments from the City, NCE will then prepare its final pavement design tables and submit to the City.

Deliverables
• Draft & Final Pavement Design Tables with core sample summary Task 3 – Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
The work that will be performed during developing design PS&E are outlined in the subsequent Tasks. 3A) Design Data Gathering
NCE will review relevant available data and records from the City as listed in the previous section, public and private utility providers, and other sources that may be appropriate to support the preparation of project contract documents. These may include, but are not limited to, the City drainage structure inventory maps, aerial photographs of the City; as-built street improvement and infrastructure plans, striping and markings, as-built plans from utility providers, including any preliminary plans for future work that may conflict with this project. The gathered information will be compiled and included in the project used for design. It shall be noted that available record data (e.g., utilities, right-of-way) used to prepare the base map for streets undergoing rehabilitation Carmel Ave
Mill and Overlay

8.a
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 4
will not be shown in the vicinity map used in this project. Based on our review we will identify any data gaps or missing information and provide this information to the City for review and discussion. 3B) 60% PS&E
NCE will prepare the 60% PS&E for the planned surface seal or rehabilitation street sections. The 60% plans for subject street sections will incorporate schematic design elements, localized spot/base repairs (digouts) quantities, striping quantities, curb and gutter repair schedules, and limits of work. On subject street sections to offer the most cost-effective approach, plans will only include vicinity maps delineating limits of treatment with accurate field inventories for bid quantities and appropriate detail sheets with exceptions noted under key assumptions. Plan sheets will include curb and gutter replacement and base repair schedules only but will not show individual locations on design plans. Base repair and curb repairs will be marked in the field on the pavement in white paint and numbered and verified prior to construction. Additionally, a table summarizing major work items (e.g. surface seal or rehabilitation area, spot/base repair area, etc.) and their estimated quantities will be developed and included on the respective plan sheets. We find that this information is particularly useful to contractors when assembling construction bids and schedules, thus resulting in more competitive bids, and to the City for verifying pay quantities during construction.

NCE understands that the City will provide the “Front End” documents and Special Provisions. The technical specifications will be prepared in MS Word format and will follow the City’s formatting conventions. The technical specifications and details will reference the City’s standard provisions and Caltrans 2025 Standards (including subsequent updates). NCE will, however, recommend deviating from Caltrans standards where, from our experience, such changes will improve the likelihood of achieving a successful construction project without compromising the integrity of the design. NCE recognizes the value of incorporating Caltrans Standard Specifications in projects such as these, both because these specifications have been developed by an agency that designs and builds a vast amount of highway work, and because most contractors performing public works construction in Northern California are familiar with them. Caltrans, however, has the resources to administer projects quite differently than most local agencies, so NCE advocates modifying the Caltrans Standard Specifications to better fit the abilities, needs, and budgets of municipal agencies.

NCE also believes that an efficient, yet thorough Quality Control/Quality Assurance program is essential for getting the maximum value out of every dollar spent on construction. Projects designed by NCE therefore contain technical specifications that attempt to optimize the balance between using rigid, but time-tested, specifications and meeting local agency needs, with the ultimate goal of obtaining the very best value for its clients.

The Engineer’s Cost Estimate will be prepared in MS Excel format and will be based on the most recent construction cost data available to NCE for projects of this type. Because of NCE’s involvement in the design and construction of numerous similar projects throughout California, we are confident in our ability to estimate the construction cost of the City’s project. This initial estimate will then be updated and refined as the design effort progresses.

It is assumed that the City will require a 10-day review/comment period once the 60% PS&E package is submitted.

Deliverables
• One electronic file of 60% plans, technical specifications, and engineer’s estimate 3C) 90% PS&E
The 60% PS&E will be revised to incorporate comments received from the City. NCE will meet with the City to review these comments, from which the 90% PS&E will be prepared. NCE will provide a response to each comment that is included in a comment table provided by the City. The 90% PS&E will include additional design information and details typically expected at this stage of completion. The 90% PS&E will then be packaged and submitted similar to the 60% PS&E unless directed otherwise.

The technical specifications will be further refined and at this stage of the design. We will review and comment on the City’s Front End documents (bid and contract forms, General Provisions, Special Provisions, etc.), which the City will prepare and provide.

The Engineer’s Cost Estimate will also be updated to reflect the revised quantities of work depicted on the plans.

It is assumed that the City will require a 5-day review/comment period once the 90% PS&E package is submitted.

Deliverables
• One electronic file of 90% plans, technical specifications, and engineer’s estimate 3D) Final (100%) PS&E
The 90% PS&E will be revised to incorporate comments received from the City. NCE will again meet with the City to review these comments, from which the final (100%) PS&E will be prepared. NCE will provide a response to each comment that is included in a comment table provided by the City. The final (100%) PS&E will include all notes and details necessary for construction. One

8.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 5
electronic file of the final (100%) PS&E will then be packaged and submitted similar to the 90% PS&E unless directed otherwise.

It is assumed that the City will require a 5-day review/comment period once the final (100%) PS&E package is submitted.

Upon receipt of the City’s final review comments, the project documents will be finalized for bidding purposes.

A final quantity calculation will be tabulated, and this will be entered into the final Engineer’s Cost Estimate for the project. All final documents will be reviewed, stamped and signed by NCE’s registered civil engineer, and the final PS&E will be delivered to the City in electronic format.

Deliverables
• One electronic file of the final plans, technical specifications, and engineer’s estimate. The electronic files for the final construction plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate will be in AutoCAD 2026, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel, respectively
Task 4 – Bidding and Construction Supports
4A) Bidding Support Services:

NCE will provide the City with assistance during the advertisement and bidding periods for concrete and pavement resurfacing bid packages. This will include providing assistance to the City in attending the pre-bid conference, responding to questions received about the project design, and preparation of any addenda and/or clarifications to the PS&E that are deemed necessary.

NCE can also assist the City in determining the responsiveness of bids received and with checking and tabulating bid results. 4B) Construction Support Services:

NCE will provide support services to the City during construction of the project for each bid package. At a minimum, these services are anticipated to include attendance at the pre-construction conference, reviewing contractor submittals and responding to contractor requests for information, field verification of localized repair (or pavement digouts) areas, providing recommendations for any necessary construction changes due to unforeseen field conditions, assisting with the review of Contract Change Orders, and reviewing construction for acceptance. This task does not provide any field inspection services and we understand that all construction inspections will be provided by the City.

Task 5 – As Needed Professional Services (Optional)
5A) Topography Survey for Curb Ramps and 3D Design:

NCE has identified approximately 22 locations for curb ramp improvements in this project based on preliminary field review in late February 2026. All curb ramps will be field verified to determine the appropriate standard case ramp and NCE will develop a detail for those that will require custom curb ramp locations. As an optional task, NCE will discuss with City to identify curb ramp locations that require topography survey to obtain more accurate measurements and elevations for 3D design. The survey effort will focus on areas with known or suspected steep slopes, complex grading conditions, potential drainage issues, or right-of-way concerns/conflicts that may impact ADA compliance or constructability. The survey will capture high-accuracy horizontal and vertical data within the project limits, including sidewalk and ramp areas, curb and gutter flowlines, pavement edges, existing ramps, driveways, and nearby drainage inlets. Elevation data will be collected at sufficient intervals to support detailed 3D design and grading analysis. The collected topographic data will be used to develop ADA-compliant ramp designs and ensure proper surface drainage and tie-ins with adjacent infrastructure. Additional design hours will be required to analyze the data and complete the ramp design details accordingly. Additional scope and fee will be provided when the final list of ramp locations for survey is finalized. We have assumed up to 22 curb ramp locations will require topography survey and 3D design in the fee estimates.

Grade and slope corrections within crosswalks or implied crossings are not included in our scope work, but should be confirmed with final pavement treatments as they apply to PROWAG requirements and the latest guidance from Caltrans Design Information Bulletins (e.g. DIB 82-06).

Preliminary Project Schedule
Similar to previous projects we
completed for City’s Pavement
Resurfacing Project since 2021, NCE will
prepare the construction documents for
bidding in late 2026. Two separate
packages for concrete repairs and
pavement resurfacing will be developed
April May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Project Kickoff and Coordination
Data Collection and Pavement Design
60% PS&E - Concrete Package
60% PS&E - Resurfacing Package
90% PS&E - Concrete Package
90% PS&E - Resurfacing Package
Final (100% PS&E) - Concrete Package
Final (100% PS&E) - Resurfacing Package
2026 Task

8.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 6
in this project and scheduled to be completed by November to early December 2026. Detailed design schedule will be provided in the kickoff meeting with the City.

Company Information
Firm Profile
Founded in 1990, NCE is a client-focused professional consulting firm integrating the disciplines of engineering, science, and planning to address the infrastructure and resources challenges facing our communities today and in the future. Over 85% of NCE’s work is on public works projects with local public entities. This contract will be managed and primarily conducted from our Point Richmond office. Our Point Richmond office has 25 staff to help facilitate on various types of projects. In addition, NCE has more than 140 employees available on an as-needed basis depending on service disciplines required from our Oakland, Sacramento, and Anaheim, California offices, as well as from our Reno (headquarters), Lake Tahoe, and Las Vegas, Nevada offices.

Complete Streets. We understand the importance of incorporating and designing complete streets elements, such as bulbouts, landscaping, green infrastructure (e.g., bioretention), bus transit improvements, lighting, restriping, road diet, buffered and separated bike lanes, and dedicated bike lanes, into street improvement projects – making them safe for multi-modal users, including transit riders, motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians. We are currently working on complete street designs for the City of Alameda (Grand Street), City of Richmond, City of San Leandro, and City of South San Francisco as part of the many rehabilitation projects that we are leading including recently the MLK Junior Way Vision Zero Quick Build Project for safety improvements at 9 intersections. When rehabilitating or designing complete streets, NCE meets with our clients to discuss options to improve safety and overall user experience, whether it is crossing the street, bicycling to work, or calming/slowing traffic.

Civil Design. NCE’s civil and pavement design engineers and technicians are experienced in developing plans, specifications, and engineer’s cost estimates (PS&E) for many City, County, and State rehabilitation and complete street projects. The benefit of this experience to the City is that we thoroughly understand the cost and community impacts of our recommended designs. NCE staff pride themselves in thinking about how construction will impact a neighborhood, a busy arterial, or pedestrian bicycle traffic and access. Our civil engineers are well versed in civil design elements that include bike and pedestrian safety improvements, drainage improvements such as stormwater run-off reduction with bio-retention basins, landscape and planter improvements, ADA curb ramps and sidewalks, curb and gutter, traffic striping and signs, and utility relocation and have expertise in the latest guidelines from Caltrans, FHWA, and NACTO.

Pavement Design. Pavement design and PS&Es for maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction are NCE’s specialty. We offer unrivaled experience and expertise with pavement treatment alternatives. We have designed thousands of roads and trails throughout California. Our expertise in pavement treatment alternatives includes, but is not limited to, cost saving, cutting edge, and green/sustainable paving technologies, such as multi-layer seal, warm mix asphalt and in-place recycling technologies. We consider many factors during pavement design, including cost, performance, future maintenance, traffic, access, pavement section properties, geometric constraints, and climate, including shaded areas and drip lines. NCE has comprehensive knowledge of both the Greenbook and Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications, which are most commonly referenced throughout California towns and cities.

Pavement Management. NCE has extensive experience evaluating and implementing pavement management systems for numerous public agencies throughout California and the west coast. We are a nationally recognized pavement specialty firm, with broad capabilities and expertise in pavement management. We provide pavement management services and are proficient with most software currently in use, including PAVER™, StreetSaver®, and Cartegraph, which account for 76% of all California agencies. We have successfully implemented PMP for numerous cities and have assisted the City in the development of a multiyear capital improvement program more effectively. We are active in over 10 pavement-related (including pavement and asset management) committees at the Transportation Research Board, a national research organization. NCE’s prior project experience with hundreds of other cities on PMP and pavement design allows us to deliver accurate, reliable, consistent pavement data that may then be used by the City to develop pavement strategies and make future funding decisions.

Green Infrastructure and Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit (MRP) 3.0. NCE’s Engineers and Landscape Architects incorporate Green Infrastructure elements into their projects to provide communities with healthier public spaces, visually appealing streetscapes, enhanced pedestrian experience, storm water quality/management, reduced impervious pavements and minimize the impacts of climate change. Specific techniques include the adaptive reuse of tires as a component of rubberized cape seals and hot mix asphalt, reducing heat island impacts with the use of light aggregate and replacing impervious pavements

8.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 7
with permeable pavers within parkways. With an innovative approach, NCE’s landscape architects worked with South San Francisco on its 2021 Green Infrastructure Program to study opportunities to integrate a range of green infrastructure elements.

During our pavement and civil design, we will also consider the recent third reissuance of the San Francisco Bay MRP 3.0) and the new regulated project thresholds in Provision C.3 under the San Mateo Water Pollution Prevention Program (SMWPPP).

California Office Locations
This contract will be managed by the NCE Point Richmond office. NCE’s contact person is Mei-Hui Lee (T: (510) 520-5927; E:
[email protected]).

Point Richmond (contract to be managed from this office) Sacramento 1003 West Cutting Blvd. Suite 110 8801 Folsom Blvd, Suite 265 Point Richmond, CA 94804 Sacramento, CA 95826
(510) 215-3620 (916) 388-5655
Organization Type
Chartered
Auditing Standards Affirmative Statement
NCE is independent of the City as defined by generally accepted auditing standards the U.S. General Accounting Office's Government Auditing Standards (1994).

Litigation/Mediation/Arbitration Statement
NCE does not have any current or pending litigation, nor has NCE been involved in any related litigation within the last 5 years, that may affect our ability to perform services. In addition, there have not been any claims or disciplinary action taken against NCE or any of NCE’s key personnel within the past five years.

Company Personnels
Staff Name and Title Phone Number License/Certification NCE
J. Ryan Shafer, PE, GE, Principal (510) 333-7684 CA Civil Professional Engineer #62349 CA Geotechnical Professional Engineer #2713
Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE, Associate Engineer (510) 520-5927 CA Civil Professional Engineer #87635 Franz Haidinger, PE, Principal, Chief Engineer (916) 996-4051 CA Civil Professional Engineer #64725 Victor Lemus, PE, Senior Engineer (209) 373-3176 CA Civil Professional Engineer #89769 Sampat Kedarisetty, PhD, EIT, Project Engineer (646) 881-6521 CA Engineer-in-Training #179078 Julia Shibko, EIT, Staff Engineer (916) 495-7961 CA Engineer-in-Training #181418 Samuel McGolpin, EIT, Staff Engineer (805) 455-1007 CA Engineer-in-Training #179018 Charles Brooks, Party Chief (707) 425-6234 N/A
BSK Associates (Bulk Sample Lab Testing)
Michael Kibbey, EIT, Project Manager (925) 872-1688 CA Engineer-in-Training Jim Auser, PE, Materials Engineer (916) 809-5411 CA Civil Professional Engineer #59941 Randy Cortez, Laboratory Quality Manager (925) 315-3151 ext. 123 N/A NCE Roles and Responsibilities
Ryan Shafer, PE, GE | Principal-in-Charge, Client Sponsor Ryan Shafer, PE, GE, serving as Principal-in-Charge and Client Sponsor, will be the key person in any agreement with the City, will be responsible for overseeing the project through all phases and assist in the development of the scope, budget, planning, scheduling, and coordination of the projects. He will assist Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE, NCE’s proposed Project Manager, with ensuring the proper resources are available to successfully deliver the project. Ryan will also provide an increased access to the team beyond communication with Mei-Hui.

Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE | Project Manager
Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE, serving as Project Manager, will be the City’s point on the project, and maintain overall communication with the City and all NCE Team members. It will be her responsibility to share project status with the team and collect information to document monthly and year-to-date progress on individual activities. In consultation with the Principal/Client Sponsor, J. Ryan

8.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 8
Shafer, it will also be her responsibility to update the schedule, to develop action items to keep the project on schedule, and to examine cost-cutting measures that can be taken to streamline the project.

Franz Haidinger, PE | QA/QC Manager
Franz Haidinger, PE, will be responsible for implementing NCE’s quality assurance management program for the projects related to this on-call. He will address quality control and quality assurance procedures and expectations for each team member and will provide the quality assurance review and its documentation of the documents that will be submitted to the client.

Victor Lemus, PE | Engineering Technical Advisor
Victor Lemus, PE, will provide technical assistance to the project staff on design topics including concrete improvements, pavement design recommendations, ADA curb ramp and curb & gutter improvements, and other project elements. Victor's duties will also include providing assistance to developing the project plans, advising on the engineer's estimate unit costs based on previous experience, and developing technical specifications that are tailored to providing direction and clear measurement and payment clauses for the Contractor.

Sampat Kedarisetty, PhD, EIT | Pavement Engineer
Sampat Kedarisetty, PhD, EIT, will be responsible for leading all pavement design and materials related aspects on this project, including field data collection to mark base repair/spot repair locations, the use of the latest economical treatment methods and materials, and review of technical specifications related to Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) concrete and surface seals. This includes developing and implementing pavement investigations, marking spot repairs and base repairs on selected streets, and design scopes of work using both empirical and mechanistic design approaches.

Julia Shibko, EIT | Project Engineer Lead
Julia Shibko, EIT, will be responsible for the civil design portion of the project including field data collection, plan preparation, quantity take-off, construction cost estimating, utility coordination, signing and striping, pedestrian crossing enhancements and bicycle facilities and addressing Requests for Information (RFIs) during bidding and construction, as well as Contractor submittal review. It will be Julia’s duty to assist the team in technical engineering matters. Finally, Julia will assist Mei-Hui in managing changes to scope, cost, and schedule of project work.

Samuel McGolpin, EIT | Staff Engineer
Samuel McGolpin, EIT, will be a staff engineer and designer for the project. He will assist with the field data collection, preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates, quantity take-offs, utility coordination, and conduct field measurements and investigations, and provide responses to RFIs. It will be Samuel’s duty to assist the team in technical engineering matters.

Subconsultant Roles and Responsibilities
Michael Kibbey (BSK Associates, BSK) | Materials Testing Project Manager Lead Michael Kibbey will be the Materials Testing Project Manager (Lead) on this contract. He has more than 17 years of experience, during which he has provided project management and oversight for a multitude of public works projects and currently serves as project manager for many of BSK’s on-call materials testing and inspection contracts. Michael will be responsible for all BSK assignments and deliverables under this agreement and will oversee BSK’s budget and schedule.

Organization Chart
NCE brings a collaborative and innovative problem-solving mentality to address the technical challenges facing the City’s pavement resurfacing and day-to-day issues. As with past City projects our project manager, Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE, will be the primary point of contact for the City.

She serves as the project manager for pavement management and design projects at NCE. She has the authority to dedicate resources to City projects. She will work closely with the team and the City to apply cost-effective pavement treatments and localized repair approach based on results gained to date from previous City Pavement Resurfacing Projects from 2021 to 2026.

Mei-Hui will be supported by a team of professionals with demonstrated experience providing services for similar types of projects. Our key personnel have worked together on dozens of projects, including recent Pacifica FY2025-26 to FY2026-27 Pavement Resurfacing Project.

8.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 9
Subconsultants
BSK Associates | Laboratory Testing Support
Founded in 1966, BSK Associates has been in business for 58 years and is a 100 percent employee-owned California S-corporation that provides construction observation/materials testing/special inspection, geotechnical and environmental consulting services, and analytical laboratory services. Over the past 5 years, BSK has had a steady staff of approximately 200 employees distributed amongst offices and laboratories throughout the States of California and Washington. BSK’s Sacramento, Livermore (Bay Area), Fresno, and Bakersfield offices also house AASHTO Materials Reference Program and/or Caltrans-certified soils and materials laboratories. BSK is a registered public works contractor with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) – registration number 1000003557, and BSK’s California Corporate number is C0514527.BSK will provide laboratory testing services as needed in support of the NCE Team for City projects and design efforts. BSK has been supporting NCE since 2020 on a variety of pavement rehabilitation projects throughout northern California with special inspections and materials testing services.

Mountain Pacific Surveys | Topographic Surveying (Optional) Mountain Pacific Surveys is a certified small-business professional survey services firm providing boundary surveying and mapping, design surveys, right-of-way engineering, construction surveys, environmental surveys, monitor surveys, and photogrammetric engineering services to the public and private sector. Established in 1992, the firm is a member in good standing with Operating Engineers Local 3 and Bay Counties Association, as well as active members of the California Land Surveyor’s Association (CLSA).

Mountain Pacific Surveys will provide complete topographic surveys on streets with geometric changes related to grading/reconstruction, road diets, curb ramp, pedestrian and sidewalk areas, and drainage improvements as optional/as-needed.

Mountain Pacific Surveys is a trusted partner of NCE, working together collaboratively for over 15 years on various local roadway projects. Mountain Pacific Surveys has provided design level topographic surveying and right-of-way (ROW) mapping for approximately 100 miles of street reconstruction and pavement repair projects for numerous public agencies including the City of Pacifica.

Licensed Staff Affirmation Statement
NCE and all assigned key professional staff are properly licensed to practice in California.

Disclosure
NCE does not have any current or past business or personal relationships with any current Pacifica elected official, appointed official, City employee, or family member of any current Pacifica elected official, appointed official, or City employee. We understand any past or current business relationship may not disqualify NCE from consideration.

Experience and References
NCE works with many cities and counties in the San Francisco Bay Area. The following pages provide examples of recent, relevant projects successfully delivered by NCE and NCE key personnel, as well as subconsultants.

1. FY 2020/21 to FY2026/27 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement Projects, City of Pacifica, CA: NCE developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan.

NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. With completed project in FY2020/21 to FY2024/25, the City has paved more than half of street network, and average PCI has significantly improved from 39 to 50 in 2024. NCE then worked with the City to develop updated work plan with $2.0 million per year in FY 2025/26 to FY 2029/30. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services. NCE has provided design services and completed design packages for City’s street rehabilitation and resurfacing projects, supporting construction Before Construction
(PCI < 10)
2021 Cape Seal
(2025 PCI > 70)

8.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 10
projects totaling over $12.0 million since 2020. NCE recently completed City’s FY 2026/27 Pavement Resurfacing Project, and our engineering estimate was within 5% of the final bid results. NCE Key Personnel: Ryan Shafer, Franz Haidinger, Mei-Hui Lee, Victor Lemus, Julia Shibko, Samuel McGolpin, Sampat Kedarisetty.

2. 2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation (st2107), City of South San Francisco, CA: NCE provided engineering and design services to facilitate a rehabilitation project of all eligible streets west of 101 with a total construction cost of $18.5 million.. The 2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation Project’s goal was to perform deferred maintenance west of 101, outside of the annual surface seal program. The City is responsible for the maintenance and repair of approximately 140 centerline miles, comprised of 33 arterial miles, 39 collector miles, and 68 residential miles. The City utilizes a program of slurry seals, overlays, and surface reconstruction as maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. West of US-101 there are approximately 123 centerline miles, comprised of 23 arterial miles, 35 collector miles, and 65 residential miles. Every two years the City surveys the streets and enters the data into the South San Francisco Pavement Management Program StreetSaver® database program. NCE is responsible for project management, pavement rehabilitation design, plans, specifications, and estimates, and bidding and construction support services. NCE also completed City’s 2024 and 2025 Street Resurfacing Projects with a total construction cost of $4.1 million. NCE team was selected by the City to prepare its 2026 Street Resurfacing Project, with bids scheduled to open in March 2026. NCE Key Personnel: Ryan Shafer, Mei-Hui Lee, Victor Lemus, Franz Haidinger, Samuel McGolpin, Sampat Kedarisetty.

3. 2025 Surface Seal Project, City of Millbrae, CA: NCE worked with the City on its 5-year work plan development in early 2024. The 5-year work plan was developed based on City’s budget, the desire to have a resurfacing project each year, grouping and aggregating by neighborhoods for efficiency of design, construction (less mobilization), future maintenance, and to be able to treat more streets with a limited pavement resurfacing annual budget. Costeffective rubberized cape seal or multi-layer surface seal were applied on streets in generally very poor to fair condition without severe subgrade failure and slurry seals will be applied to streets in generally fair to good condition in an effort to extend pavement life, address moderately cracked pavement, and improve ride quality. Mill and overlay or surface reconstruction will be utilized on streets with very poor to failed condition, high severity fatigue cracking and/or evidence of problematic subgrade. The City recently completed the 2025 Surface Seal Project with a total construction cost of approximately $0.9 million. The project included approximately 2.6 centerline miles of streets with various surface seal treatments NCE is currently working with the City to identify 2026 street candidates for next year’s surface seal project. NCE is currently working with the City on its Utility and Pavement Resurfacing Project on Helen Dr and Redwood Way.

NCE Key Personnel: Ryan Shafer, Franz Haidinger, Mei-Hui Lee, Samuel McGolpin, Sampat Kedarisetty.

4. 2016 Pavement Rehabilitation and 2022-2023 and 2025-2026 Street Resurfacing, City of Daly City, CA: NCE completed pavement and civil design services initially back in 2016 Street Resurfacing project. The City requested the most cost-efficient pavement rehabilitation strategies with a preference for more conventional paving materials (HMA) that the City has experience with based on limitation of City inspection staff resources. The construction cost for this project was approximately $2 million. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement condition and treatments to finalize the work plan. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, PS&Es, and bidding and construction support services. NCE was recently selected by the City again to prepare its 2025-2026 Street Resurfacing Projects. Mill and overlay, as well as CIR with HMA overlay, will be applied on San Diego Avenue and John Daly Boulevard, with an estimated construction cost of $3.2 million. The project is scheduled to be advertised for bid in summer 2026.

NCE Key Personnel: Ryan Shafer, Franz Haidinger, Victor Lemus, Mei-Hui Lee, Samuel McGolpin.

5. Citywide Surface Treatment Package 6-B, City of San Mateo, CA: NCE is providing engineering design services, including civil and pavement engineering, to support the Citywide Street Rehabilitation Package 6-B project. The majority of the street sections included in this project are located in the Hayward Park, North Central, and Shoreview areas as shown on the map to the left. The Project will resurface approximately 3.0 centerline miles of streets by employing conventional overlay methods or cost-effective recycling like Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) or Cold-in-Place Recycling (CIR) treatments with an estimated

8.a
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing City of Pacifica
Design and Engineering Services for the FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project March 4, 2026
Page | 11
construction cost of $4.9 million; recommended by the City’s pavement management report.

Pavement conditions of selected streets are generally in poor to failed conditions with pavement condition index (PCI) average less than 50 points. The scope of services includes evaluating the condition of the pavement of the street segments, conduct surveys, perform geotechnical investigations, and recommend pavement rehabilitation solutions. NCE will also prepare the basis of design report, preliminary and final design plans, specifications and estimates for City to advertise the project. NCE Key Personnel: Ryan Shafer, Franz Haidinger, Victor Lemus, Samuel McGolpin, Sampat Kedarisetty.

References
Provided below are three references, within the past five years of clients for whom services have been performed that are comparable in quality and scope to that specified in this RFP.

NCE
FY 2020/21to FY 2026/27 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement (Project #1) Client: City of Pacifica, 1800 Francisco Blvd, Pacifica, CA 94044 Contact Name and Phone Number: Roland Yip, PE | (650) 738-3771 Email Address: [email protected]
Services Provided: Civil and Pavement Engineering Design Services Start/End Dates: 11/2020 to Present
2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation and 2024-2026 Annual Street Resurfacing Projects (Project #2) Agency: City of South San Francisco, 400 Grand Ave, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Contact Name and Phone Number: Angel Torres, PE | (650) 829-6660 Email Address: [email protected]
Services Provided: Engineering and Design Services
Start/End Dates: 3/2021 to Present
2025 Surface Seal (Project #3)
Agency: City of Millbrae, 621 Magnolia Ave, Millbrae, CA 94030 Contact Name and Phone Number: Ahmad Haya | (650) 259-2462 Email Address: [email protected]
Services Provided: Pavement Engineering Design Services Start/End Dates: 11/2024 to Present

8.a
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
MS, Geotechnical Engineering,
University of California, Berkeley,
1998
BS, Geological Engineering,
Colorado School of Mines, 1996
Registrations and
Certifications
Professional Engineer – Civil, CA
#62349
Professional Engineer –
Geotechnical, CA #2713
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers
American Public Works
Association
Joined NCE
2005
Total Years of Experience
25 years
J. Ryan Shafer, PE, GE
Principal-in-Charge
Ryan is an experienced Principal and Project Manager who is highly skilled in managing interdisciplinary teams of engineers, scientists, and planners for complex projects requiring civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, pavement engineering, structural engineering, transportation, and traffic engineering, hydrology and hydraulics, coastal engineering, regulatory permits, technical studies and resource assessments, and environmental documents. In addition, he has managed and provided civil and geotechnical engineering on a wide range of public and private projects, including vertical development, municipal roads, trails, drainage infrastructure, landfills, public transit, recreation areas, and parks, industrial facilities including refineries, and waterfront structures giving him an understanding of how to work with diverse project types. His clients provide feedback that NCE is an effective partner and steward, understanding what is important to each community.

Representative Projects
FY 2025/26 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement Projects City of Pacifica, CA
Principal. NCE has developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services. The City has requested NCE to complete the FY 2024/25 Pavement Resurfacing Project with a total construction cost of $1.7 million. The resurfacing includes street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. 2025 Surface Seal Project
City of Millbrae, CA
Principal. NCE worked with the City on its 5-year work plan development in early 2024.

The 5-year work plan was developed based on City’s budget, the desire to have a resurfacing project each year, grouping and aggregating by neighborhoods for efficiency of design, construction (less mobilization), future maintenance, and to be able to treat more streets with a limited pavement resurfacing annual budget. Cost-effective rubberized cape seal or multi-layer surface seal will be applied on streets in generally very poor to fair condition without severe subgrade failure and slurry seals will be applied to streets in generally fair to good condition in an effort to extend pavement life, address moderately cracked pavement, and improve ride quality. Mill and overlay or surface reconstruction will be utilized on streets with very poor to failed condition, high severity fatigue cracking and/or evidence of problematic subgrade. The City would now like to complete the 2025 Surface Seal Project with a total construction cost of approximately $0.9 million. The resurfacing street list includes the street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. The project includes approximately 2.6 centerline miles of streets that will be surface sealed. The City would like to begin design and complete construction documents for bidding in 2025 and begin construction in 2025 construction season.

8.a
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing J. Ryan Shafer, PE, GE
Page | 2
Citywide Surface Treatment Package 6-B
City of San Mateo, CA
Principal. NCE is providing engineering design services, including civil and pavement engineering, to support the Citywide Street Rehabilitation Package 6-B project. The majority of the street sections included in this project are located in the Hayward Park, North Central, and Shoreview areas as shown on the map to the left. The Project will resurface approximately 3.0 centerline miles of streets by employing conventional overlay methods or cost-effective recycling like Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) or Cold-inPlace Recycling (CIR) treatments with an estimated construction cost of $4.9 million; recommended by the City’s pavement management report. Pavement conditions of selected streets are generally in poor to failed conditions with pavement condition index (PCI) average less than 50 points. The scope of services includes evaluating the condition of the pavement of the street segments, conduct surveys, perform geotechnical investigations, and recommend pavement rehabilitation solutions. NCE will also prepare the basis of design report, preliminary and final design plans, specifications and estimates for City to advertise the Project.
2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation (st2107)
City of South San Francisco, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE is providing engineering and design services to facilitate a rehabilitation project of all eligible streets west of 101. The 2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation Project’s goal is to perform deferred maintenance west of 101, outside of the annual surface seal program. The City is responsible for the maintenance and repair of approximately 140 centerline miles, comprised of 33 arterial miles, 39 collector miles, and 68 residential miles. The City utilizes a program of slurry seals, overlays, and surface reconstruction as maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. West of US-101 there are approximately 123 centerline miles, comprised of 23 arterial miles, 35 collector miles, and 65 residential miles. Every two years the City surveys the streets and enters the data into the South San Francisco Pavement Management Program StreetSaver® database program. NCE is responsible for project management, pavement rehabilitation design, plans, specifications, and estimates, and bidding and construction support services.

Rumrill Boulevard Complete Streets Project
City of San Pablo, CA
Principal-in-Charge. Ryan was responsible for advising the project team, advocating for staff resources, and providing guidance on technical issues, project management, schedule, and budget. NCE is designing an approximately $15 million construction value, 2.5-mile-long complete streets project along Rumrill Boulevard. This is a community-based design process focused on transforming the street into a safe and friendly place for people and businesses by improving conditions for walking, bicycling, and transit. This street corridor will receive a road diet and Class IV bikeways in both directions of travel. Additional key project elements include landscape buffers, widened bus stop landings, increasing parking, and video detection at traffic signals for vehicles and bicycles. In addition, the project will include low impact development design and bioretention basins, landscaping improvements, curb extensions/bulbouts, sidewalk widening, crosswalk improvements with rectangular rapid flashing beacons, median refuges bus stop shelters, expanded street lighting, ADA concrete and roadway improvements (curb ramps, sidewalks, driveways, medians, and regrading pedestrian roadway crossings), storm drainage improvements, trail crossings, wayfinding signs, pedestrian and street lighting.

Grand Street OBAG 2 Rehabilitation
City of Alameda, CA
Project Manager. The NCE team has been working closely with the City of Alameda’s public works and planning staff to complete pavement and civil design and E-76 documents for the Grand Street Rehabilitation Project. This section of Grand Street from Encinal Avenue to Shoreline Drive is an important major collector street and serves as a north-south connector for neighborhood streets, schools, recreational sports fields, shoreline beach access, and South Shore Center. The project evolved into a very comprehensive complete streets project that includes parking-protected separated bike lanes and two-way cycle tracks, ADAcompliant curb ramps and pedestrian crossings, new lighted pedestrian crossings, minor drainage improvements, transit islands, and curb and gutter repairs. NCE has worked closely with City staff, presenting safety improvements to the local community, the Transportation Commission, and the City Council. As part of community outreach and presentations to the City Council and the Transportation Commission, NCE developed renderings and roll plot style graphics to support City staff and present project details to the public. The project details NCE focused on developing with the City included bike facilities to accommodate the vast range of users, including novice school-aged children and advanced commuter cyclists. The two-way cycle track design was developed to provide a separate path to the school while also accommodating traffic, transit, parking, and pedestrian access for other users

8.a
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
PhD, Civil Engineering, National
Taiwan University, Taiwan, 2009
MS, Civil Engineering, Columbia
University, New York, 2012
BS, Civil Engineering, National
Taiwan University, Taiwan, 2002
Registrations and
Certifications
Professional Engineer – Civil, CA
#87635
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Nevada Water Resources
Association
American Public Works
Association
Joined NCE
2014
Total Years of Experience
12 years
Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE
Project Manager
Dr. Mei-Hui Lee has a PhD in civil engineering and is experienced in pavement design, evaluation, and maintenance projects. Dr. Lee has abundant field experience at various international airfields, including runway design, pavement structure evaluation, and field surveys. She also has research experience at the Federal Aviation Administration National Airport Pavement Test Facility in runway design life extension and aircraft baking performance simulation projects. Currently, she serves as the project manager for pavement management and design projects at NCE. Her clients include the Counties of Sacramento, Trinity, Lake, and Mariposa, as well as multiple cities, including Sacramento, South San Francisco, Martinez, and Folsom. She is responsible for the analysis and quality control of pavement distress data collection, updating maintenance and rehabilitation decision trees and the treatment unit costs, and the development of budget scenarios and summary reports. She has developed cost-effective maintenance treatments and strategies, prepared custom multiple-year detailed street maintenance plans and budget option reports, and linked Geographic Information System maps with management sections in the client’s Pavement Management Program database.

Representative Projects
FY 2025/26 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement Projects City of Pacifica, CA
Project Manager. NCE has recently updated the FY 2025/26 to FY 2029/30 Work Plan with an average of $2.2 million annual paving budget. The updated 5-year Work Plan was reviewed and approved by the City Council in early July 2024. The City would now like to complete the FY 2025/26 Pavement Resurfacing Project with a total construction cost of approximately $1.8 million, not including design, construction management or construction contingency. The resurfacing street list includes street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. The City would like to begin the design and complete construction documents for bidding in early 2025 and begin construction in Summer 2025. NCE has collected pavement structure information over the past five years and had average existing material thicknesses in various neighborhoods throughout the City. Since all selected streets in the FY 2025/26 projects are surface seal candidates without rehabilitation or reconstruction, pavement core samples will not be performed. 2021-2022 Pavement Resurfacing Program
City of Pacifica, CA
Project Manager. NCE has developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services.
2025 Surface Seal Project
City of Millbrae, CA
Project Manager. NCE worked with the City on its 5-year work plan development in early 2024. The 5-year work plan was developed based on City’s budget, the desire to have a resurfacing project each year, grouping and aggregating by neighborhoods for efficiency of design, construction (less mobilization), future maintenance, and to be able to treat more streets with a limited

8.a
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Mei-Hui Lee, PhD, PE
Page | 2
pavement resurfacing annual budget. Cost-effective rubberized cape seal or multi-layer surface seal will be applied on streets in generally very poor to fair condition without severe subgrade failure and slurry seals will be applied to streets in generally fair to good condition in an effort to extend pavement life, address moderately cracked pavement, and improve ride quality. Mill and overlay or surface reconstruction will be utilized on streets with very poor to failed condition, high severity fatigue cracking and/or evidence of problematic subgrade. The City would now like to complete the 2025 Surface Seal Project with a total construction cost of approximately $0.9 million. The resurfacing street list includes the street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. The project includes approximately 2.6 centerline miles of streets that will be surface sealed. The City would like to begin design and complete construction documents for bidding in 2025 and begin construction in 2025 construction season. 2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation
City of South San Francisco, CA
Project Manager. Dr. Lee oversaw the project from start to finish and ensured the project met its objectives and stayed on schedule. NCE is providing engineering and design services to facilitate a rehabilitation project of all eligible streets west of Highway 101. The project’s goal is to perform deferred maintenance on all sections west of Highway 101 with poor or failed pavement conditions, outside of the annual surface seal program. The City is responsible for the maintenance and repair of approximately 140 centerline miles, comprised of 33 arterial miles, 39 collector miles, and 68 residential miles. The City utilizes a program of slurry seals, overlays, and surface reconstruction as maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. This project includes approximately 19 centerline miles of streets (15% of the entire City network) for rehabilitation and reconstruction with approximately $25 million in total project costs. Overall network Pavement Condition Index will improve to the high 80s upon completion of construction in 2022. On average approximately $2.0 million per year will be required to maintain the Pavement Condition Index at the 80s over the next 10 years within the City’s annual resurfacing program by zones, which represents a cost savings of $4.6 million per year from what the City is currently spending to maintain the network. NCE is responsible for project management, pavement rehabilitation design, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services. 2017-2022 Street Surface Seal and Pavement Rehabilitation City of South San Francisco, CA
Project Manager. NCE has completed pavement resurfacing, rehabilitation, and reconstruction projects for the City since 2017, which comprised 47.7 centerline miles of streets for resurfacing and 16.0 centerline miles of streets for rehabilitation. Every two years, the City surveys the streets and enters the data into the StreetSaver® database. This database assists staff in determining the Pavement Condition Index for each street segment and the street network overall. NCE assists the City in updating historical maintenance and rehabilitation records and conducting field reviews to identify candidate streets for the City’s annual surface seal and rehabilitation programs. Based on the City’s paving budgets and maintenance strategy, NCE has utilized the StreetSaver® database and field reviews to develop a multi-year work plan for the City in 2018, 2020, and 2022.

Rumrill Boulevard Complete Streets
City of San Pablo, CA
Pavement Engineer. Dr. Lee conducted field investigation, and pavement design and provided construction support for base repair verification. NCE is designing an approximately $15 million construction value, 2.5-mile-long complete streets project along Rumrill Boulevard. This is a community-based design process focused on transforming the street into a safe and friendly place for people and businesses by improving conditions for walking, bicycling, and transit. This street corridor will receive a road diet and Class IV bikeways in both directions of travel. Additional key project elements include landscape buffers, widened bus stop landings, increased parking, and video detection at traffic signals for vehicles and bicycles. In addition, the project will include low-impact development design and bioretention basins, landscaping improvements, curb extensions/bulbouts, sidewalk widening, crosswalk improvements with rectangular rapid flashing beacons, median refuges bus stop shelters, expanded street lighting, ADA concrete and roadway improvements (curb ramps, sidewalks, driveways, medians, and regrading pedestrian roadway crossings), storm drainage improvements, trail crossings, wayfinding signs, pedestrian and street lighting. 2025 Cape Seal
City of Vallejo, CA
Project Manager. NCE is currently working with City staff to develop a 10-year paving plan with potential bond measure funds for approximately $10 million per year on street network. NCE conducted a field review in late November to identify street candidates and a total of 8.1 centerline miles of streets with approximately $2.3 million construction cost are included in the project. NCE will develop construction documents for bidding in May/June 2025 to allow for construction in late Summer 2025. NCE is also providing bidding support and construction support services.

8.a
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
DI (Diplom-Ingenieur), Civil
Engineering, University of Natural
Resources and Life Sciences,
Vienna, Austria (Equivalent of a
MS, Civil Engineering), 1997
Registrations and
Certifications
Professional Engineer – Civil, CA
#64725
Professional Engineer – Civil, NV
#19430
Nuclear Testing Equipment
Certified, Troxler Electronic
Laboratories #079039
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineer
American Public Works
Association
Joined NCE
2004
Total Years of Experience
27 years
Franz Haidinger, PE
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager
Franz Haidinger is a licensed California Civil Engineer and is a Principal/Chief Engineer responsible for overseeing, managing, and developing designs and PS&Es for roadway improvement projects in addition to implementing sustainable pavement technologies and low-impact development features. He has over 25 years of expertise in pavement and roadway design, pavement rehabilitation, and complete streets projects. Franz provides QA/QC, develops engineering standards for NCE and oversees the firm’s QA program, critically reviews for constructability, and focuses on making construction documents practical and clear for bidding. Franz has served as Project Manager and Principal Engineer for a range of large and complex civil and pavement design projects throughout California.

Representative Projects
Pavement Rehabilitation
City of Davis, CA
Project Manager. NCE is providing pavement design and engineering services for the City’s 2024 pavement rehabilitation project with approximately 2.0 centerline miles of streets and 1.4 centerline miles of bike paths exported from the City’s 5-year work plan.

Street sections in the Village Homes neighborhood are in generally poor to failed condition with high percentage fatigue cracking and subgrade failure making those sections good candidates for mill and overlay or reconstruction. Bike paths along Covell Boulevard and in the Aspen neighborhood show evidence of tree root uplift and subgrade movement. Most of the bike paths in this project are thin mill and overlay or reconstruction candidates. The total construction budget for this project is approximately $2.5 million, and the City is planning to construct this project in the summer/fall of 2024. 2018-2023 Annual Overlay/Rehabilitation Pavement Design and Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
City of San Leandro, CA
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager. Franz provided quality control reviews of project submittals to be consistent with NCE’s Quality Assurance Management Program. The City selected NCE to prepare construction documents and pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction design for 23 arterial, collector, and residential streets (5 miles). NCE’s scope of work included pavement investigation and design and preparation of civil design plans, specifications, and estimates for construction.

Pavement design solutions included conventional and rubberized hot mix asphalt overlays, full-depth asphalt reconstruction, full-depth reclamation instead of more expensive conventional reconstruction, and a pilot project for cold central plant recycling on an arterial street based on recommendations provided by NCE. Visible drainage issues were addressed, such as localized ponding in the gutter pan, the design of over 100 Americans with Disabilities Act ramps, curb and gutter repairs, and improvements to striping and pavement markings with the addition of class II and class IV bike lanes.

NCE submitted and managed three encroachment permit applications with the California Department of Transportation as the project encroached on three state routes. NCE’s engineer’s estimate matched that of the winning contractor bid, indicating that NCE was able to anticipate the value of the scope of work and contractor climate.

8.a
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Franz Haidinger, PE
Page | 2
Spinnaker Way Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvements City of Berkeley, CA
Project Manager. NCE was retained by the City to provide engineering and design services for the reconstruction of Spinnaker Way, a roadway in the Berkeley Marina. The undulating pavement requires reconstruction and improvements to the roadway drainage. To mitigate the drainage issues, the roadway reconstruction uses full-depth reclamation, which allows existing road materials to be pulverized and regraded to fix drainage issues. In addition, the project includes pervious parking areas to capture and detain stormwater runoff, and a new system of drain inlets, manholes, and storm drainpipes to convey excess runoff to the Bay. NCE also provided permitting services for a San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission permit and prepared the California Environmental Quality Act document for the project. The estimated construction cost is $2,700,000.

Pavement Rehabilitation/Maintenance and Bikeway Improvements Presidio of San Francisco, CA
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager/Principal Engineer. Franz is responsible for implementing NCE’s quality assurance management program for the project, performing quality control reviews on plans, specifications, and estimates, and providing design support. NCE was selected by the Presidio Trust to design their pavement rehabilitation and maintenance project. The scope of this project includes preparing plans, specifications, and cost estimates for bidding purposes. Design elements of the project include pavement design, a roundabout, modification to existing striping and markings to introduce class II and III bikeways and an advisory bike lane, roadway grading, drainage solutions and design, and a bus platform. NCE will incorporate the new bikeway facilities with careful consideration for the transit routes and stops that overlap with the project. Drainage issues the Trust is facing on a bike path with a steep grade; water seeping from uphill areas onto the path is causing safety concerns. NCE will evaluate design alternatives to alleviate the drainage issue by collecting water to create safer riding conditions for the path users. 5-Year Pavement Preservation Program/On-Call Pavement Management and Design Services City of Martinez, CA
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Manager. Franz is responsible for ensuring the NCE team has the resources necessary to successfully deliver services during the contract. He also assists the project manager in establishing budgets, and schedules, and monitors the adherence to terms of contract expectations. As part of its 5-year work plan developed by NCE, the City allowed for pavement rehabilitation and resurfacing to be designed in advance of construction and allowed for earlier bidding to obtain competitive bids. It was the City’s desire to have resurfacing and rehabilitation projects for each year, grouping and aggregating by neighborhoods for efficiency of design, construction (less mobilization), and future maintenance. More cost-effective cape seal on poor pavement condition or full depth reclamation under failed pavement condition with base material failure to help the City treat more streets within limited budgets. NCE worked with the City to update pavement strategies and conducted field reviews to verify pavement condition and design of treatments in different neighborhoods. NCE also supported City staff for Measure D workshops and City Council meetings. Currently, NCE is providing pavement and civil design services on 2023 street surface seal and rehabilitation projects (approximately $6 million construction costs) and updating the 5-year work plan with the City’s updated construction budget.

Measure M 2016 Pavement Rehabilitation
City of Berkeley, CA
Project Technical Lead and Quality Control Manager. For the development of pavement design and plans, specifications, and estimates for the second phase of a large pavement rehabilitation project, consisting of 15 rehabilitation and reconstruction street sections and 24 surface seal street sections, replacing/retrofitting nearly 150 curb ramps, replacement of curb/gutter, storm drains, intersection reconstruction and bike and pedestrian improvements Franz was the Technical Lead. The project was completed in a very tight time frame to allow for early bidding to complete construction in the summer of 2016 and required close communication with City staff, utilities, and stakeholders.

8.a
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
PhD, University of California,
Davis, 2025
MTech, Transportation
Engineering,
Indian Institute of Technology,
Kharagpur, India, 2016
BTech, Civil Engineering, Bhilai
Institute of Technology, Durg,
India, 2014
Registrations and
Certifications
Engineer-in-Training, CA 179078
Metropolitan Transportation
Commission StreetSaver® Rater
Certification
Affiliations
American Society of Civil
Engineers
Joined NCE
2023
Total Years of Experience
8 years
Sampat Kedarisetty, PhD, EIT
Pavement Project Engineer
Sampat Kedarisetty, PhD, EIT, has extensive education and laboratory experience in pavement design, rehabilitation, and management. His master’s dissertation was focused on analyzing the use of rubber in pavements through exhaustive laboratory testing for rutting, cracking, and moisture damage. His PhD has been focused on using real-world distress data from cities and counties in California using StreetSaver® and RoadMatrix to analyze treatment performance. Sampat has used Caltrans’ Pavement Design program, CalME, extensively and created a full factorial design for various climate, traffic, and pavement conditions. He has also worked on creating strategies for pavement management using life cycle cost analysis.

Representative Projects
FY 2025/26 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement Projects City of Pacifica, CA
Pavement Project Engineer. NCE has developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services. The City has requested NCE to complete the FY 2024/25 Pavement Resurfacing Project with a total construction cost of $1.7 million. The resurfacing includes street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes.

FY 2024/25 Pavement Resurfacing Program
City of Pacifica, CA
Pavement Project Engineer. Sampat worked to review pavement conditions in the field, identified locations for localized repairs such as base repairs and spot repairs, attended field discussions with City officials to explain the relevance and applicability of different treatments being recommended, and provided final pavement designs. NCE has been working with the City on its 5-year work plan since 2020 and we have completed the FY 2020/21 to FY 2023/24 pavement resurfacing projects since then. The work plan for the City involves surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s SB1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. For the FY 2020/21 and 2023/24 projects, field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower PCI to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of these projects, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, and estimates, and bidding and construction support services. The City has retained NCE to complete the FY 2024/25 Pavement Resurfacing project.

8.a
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Sampat Kedarisetty, PhD, EIT
Page | 2
2025 Surface Seal Project
City of Millbrae, CA
Pavement Project Engineer. NCE worked with the City on its 5-year work plan development in early 2024. The 5-year work plan was developed based on City’s budget, the desire to have a resurfacing project each year, grouping and aggregating by neighborhoods for efficiency of design, construction (less mobilization), future maintenance, and to be able to treat more streets with a limited pavement resurfacing annual budget. Cost-effective rubberized cape seal or multi-layer surface seal will be applied on streets in generally very poor to fair condition without severe subgrade failure and slurry seals will be applied to streets in generally fair to good condition in an effort to extend pavement life, address moderately cracked pavement, and improve ride quality. Mill and overlay or surface reconstruction will be utilized on streets with very poor to failed condition, high severity fatigue cracking and/or evidence of problematic subgrade. The City would now like to complete the 2025 Surface Seal Project with a total construction cost of approximately $0.9 million. The resurfacing street list includes the street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. The project includes approximately 2.6 centerline miles of streets that will be surface sealed. The City would like to begin design and complete construction documents for bidding in 2025 and begin construction in 2025 construction season.

Citywide Surface Treatment Package 6-B
City of San Mateo, CA
Pavement Project Engineer. NCE is providing engineering design services, including civil and pavement engineering, to support the Citywide Street Rehabilitation Package 6-B project. The majority of the street sections included in this project are located in the Hayward Park, North Central, and Shoreview areas as shown on the map to the left. The Project will resurface approximately

3.0 centerline miles of streets by employing conventional overlay methods or cost-effective recycling like Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) or Cold-in-Place Recycling (CIR) treatments with an estimated construction cost of $4.9 million; recommended by the City’s pavement management report. Pavement conditions of selected streets are generally in poor to failed conditions with PCI average less than 50 points. The scope of services includes evaluating the condition of the pavement of the street segments, conduct surveys, perform geotechnical investigations, and recommend pavement rehabilitation solutions. NCE will also prepare the basis of design report, preliminary and final design plans, specifications and estimates for City to advertise the project.

Pavement Rehabilitation 2025 SB1
City of Sunnyvale, CA
Pavement Project Engineer. NCE provided pavement and civil engineering design for the rehabilitation of various residential, collector, and arterial street sections within the City for the 2016 and 2019 Street Rehabilitation Projects, and the City recently retained NCE for the 2025 contract. The projects include utility and outside agency coordination, pavement and curb/gutter condition survey, pavement coring, pavement design recommendations, traffic engineering for traffic signal modification, plans, specifications, estimates, bidding, and construction support services, and California Department of Transportation encroachment permitting. Typical design considerations included Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant curb ramps, striping and markers, spot milling and base repairs, milling, wedge grinds, crack sealing, existing utilities, and traffic loops. 2024 Pavement Rehabilitation
City of Davis, CA
Project Engineer. Sampat worked to review pavement conditions in the field that included city streets as well as bike paths, identified locations to perform pavement investigation through coring, and identified locations for localized base repairs. Performed pavement design for a 20-year design life using the R-value method, attended field discussions, and coordinated with City officials to explain the relevance and applicability of different treatments being recommended and provided final pavement designs. NCE is providing pavement design and engineering services for the City’s 2024 pavement rehabilitation project with approximately 2.0 centerline miles of streets and 1.4 centerline miles of bike paths exported from the City’s 5-year work plan. Street sections in the Village Homes neighborhood are generally in poor to failed condition with high percentage fatigue cracking and subgrade failure making those sections good candidates for mill and overlay or reconstruction. Bike paths along Covell Boulevard and in the Aspen neighborhood show evidence of tree root uplift and subgrade movement. Most of the bike paths in this project are thin mill and overlay or reconstruction candidates. The total construction budget for this project is approximately $2.5 million, and the City is planning to construct this project in the summer/fall of 2024.

8.a
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
BS, Civil & Environmental
Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 2014
Registrations and
Certifications
Professional Engineer, Civil – CA
#89769
Affiliations
Chi Epsilon
Joined NCE
2014
Total Years of Experience
10 years
Victor Lémus, PE
Technical Lead
Victor Lémus, PE, is a high initiative, experienced Project Engineer that regularly assists with management of projects, is a task leader, and is recognized for his attention to detail and great follow-up. He is recognized for his ADA design expertise with curb ramp and bulbouts as part of significant roadway rehabilitation projects on streets throughout Northern California that often include difficult grades, utility issues, tight ROW constraints, and in some cases require consideration of design exceptions. Victor is also proficient at street layout plan and profile design, striping plans, and civil design details for street improvement projects. Victor has extensive field data experience and lead teams of engineers on field data collection on roadway for curb and gutters, sidewalk, digouts or base repairs, ADA curb ramps, crosswalks, striping, and drainage improvements.

Representative Projects
FY 2025/26 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement Projects City of Pacifica, CA
Senior Civil Engineer. NCE has developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services. The City has requested NCE to complete the FY 2024/25 Pavement Resurfacing Project with a total construction cost of $1.7 million. The resurfacing includes street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes.

FY 20/21 and FY 21/22 Pavement Resurfacing Program
City of Pacifica, CA
Project Engineer. Victor coordinated and led field data collection to produce bid documents for hundreds of resurfacings and rehabilitation street sections. He designed and reviewed the plans, specifications, and estimates elements such as curb ramps, concrete repairs, pavement treatments, and striping improvements. NCE has developed 5-year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s SB1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, and estimates, and bidding and construction support services.

8.a
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Victor Lémus, PE
Page | 2
Four Priority Parks
City of Pacifica, CA
Senior Civil Engineer. Victor conducted initial park reconnaissance and field data collection to identify potential improvements and site constraints. Known for its natural beauty and small-town character, Pacifica is filled with numerous public open spaces that include hiking trails overlooking the ocean and many well-used neighborhood parks. As part of Fiscal Year 2021-22 improvement projects, the City selected NCE to lead and facilitate a community outreach and engagement process, create conceptual designs, and produce construction documents for the renovation of four priority parks (Skyridge, Imperial, Marvilla, and Brighton), strategically located across the City in a range of different neighborhoods. These projects are to modernize play equipment; meet safety standards and conform to the Americans with Disabilities Act; inform and engage adjacent residents; gain approval from the Public, Commissions and City Council; and create a unique identity for each park. The project required a multi-disciplinary team of landscape architects and civil engineers to coordinate cohesively on the design of roadway improvements and stormwater infrastructure.

Citywide Surface Treatment Package 6-B
City of San Mateo, CA
Senior Civil Engineer. NCE is providing engineering design services, including civil and pavement engineering, to support the Citywide Street Rehabilitation Package 6-B project. The majority of the street sections included in this project are located in the Hayward Park, North Central, and Shoreview areas as shown on the map to the left. The Project will resurface approximately 3.0 centerline miles of streets by employing conventional overlay methods or cost-effective recycling like Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) or Cold-in-Place Recycling (CIR) treatments with an estimated construction cost of $4.9 million; recommended by the City’s pavement management report. Pavement conditions of selected streets are generally in poor to failed conditions with pavement condition index (PCI) average less than 50 points. The scope of services includes evaluating the condition of the pavement of the street segments, conduct surveys, perform geotechnical investigations, and recommend pavement rehabilitation solutions. NCE will also prepare the basis of design report, preliminary and final design plans, specifications and estimates for City to advertise the project.

Pavement Rehabilitation 2025 SB1
City of Sunnyvale, CA
Project Manager. NCE provided pavement and civil engineering design for the rehabilitation of various residential, collector, and arterial street sections within the City for the 2016 and 2019 Street Rehabilitation Projects, and the City recently retained NCE for the 2025 contract. The projects include utility and outside agency coordination, pavement and curb/gutter condition survey, pavement coring, pavement design recommendations, traffic engineering for traffic signal modification, plans, specifications, estimates, bidding, and construction support services, and California Department of Transportation encroachment permitting.

Typical design considerations included Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant curb ramps, striping and markers, spot milling and base repairs, milling, wedge grinds, crack sealing, existing utilities, and traffic loops.

Citywide Phase 4 and 5 Street Rehabilitation
City of San Mateo, CA
Civil Design Lead. Victor is the technical design lead and management of staff to complete the phase 4 and phase 5 citywide reconstruction project. Heavy utility coordination to allow construction of deep pavement sections and meetings with City and internal staff to deal with problematic subgrade under the streets to be improved. NCE is currently preparing construction documents and pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction design for the City’s Phases 4 and 5 of their Smooth Street Program, including 40 residential sections with poor to failed pavement conditions. NCE provided extensive pavement investigation and design, and preparation of civil design plans, specifications, and estimates for construction in the summer of 2023 and 2024.

Pavement design alternatives included conventional hot mix asphalt overlay, surface reconstruction paving, and full-depth reclamation to correct poor subgrade. NCE prepared a comprehensive presentation to discuss existing pavement conditions, structure thickness, subgrade material properties, and utility depth investigation with the City and recommended pavement treatment options. NCE is also coordinating street light relocation work with an electrical sub at the locations where full-depth reclamation is being proposed and these shallow conduits exist.

8.a
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
BS, Civil Engineering,
California State University,
Sacramento, 2024
Registrations and
Certifications
Engineer-in-Training, #181418
Professional Engineer, Civil – CA
#TBD (anticipated 2026)
Joined NCE
2023
Total Years of Experience
3 years
Julia Shibko, EIT
Project Engineer Lead
Julia Shibko, EIT, recently graduated from California State University at Sacramento with a B.S. in Civil Engineering. She has performed field data collection, civil design development including street drainage improvements, intersection reconstruction, pavement resurfacing for the City of Martinez, Vallejo, Sunnyvale and agencies.

Representative Projects
Pavement Rehabilitation
Lake County, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE is providing pavement and civil design for the pavement rehabilitation of the selected roads within the County’s 2025 work plan, plus other roads added by the County for construction in 2024. There is a total of approximately 17 centerline miles with an estimated construction budget of $10 million. Some of the roads in the 2024 construction plan are in areas that were heavily damaged by the Valley Fire, and some residents are rebuilding their homes. The residential pavements in this plan generally exhibit a wide range of distress including significant load-related cracking and potholes, edge breakdown, patches, surface raveling and weathering, and overall are in poor condition. The major roads in the plan also exhibit a range of distress. The geometry of the roads will remain the same and no curb and gutter will be installed. The new striping will match the existing striping using the current Caltrans standard traffic striping details.

Pavement Rehabilitation 2025 SB1
City of Sunnyvale, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE provided pavement and civil engineering design for the rehabilitation of various residential, collector, and arterial street sections within the City for the 2016 and 2019 Street Rehabilitation Projects, and the City recently retained NCE for the 2025 contract. The projects include utility and outside agency coordination, pavement and curb/gutter condition survey, pavement coring, pavement design recommendations, traffic engineering for traffic signal modification, plans, specifications, estimates, bidding, and construction support services, and California Department of Transportation encroachment permitting. Typical design considerations included Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant curb ramps, striping and markers, spot milling and base repairs, milling, wedge grinds, crack sealing, existing utilities, and traffic loops.

FY 2023/24 Surface Seal and Rehabilitation
City of Martinez, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE has had the privilege of working with the City of Martinez (City) on developing the 5-Year Work Plan (5-year Plan) for pavement resurfacing and rehabilitation work since early 2022 and recently completed the 5-year Plan update for FY2023-24 to FY2027-28 earlier this year. The 5-year Plan was submitted to Measure D Committee and City Council for review and the final street list for FY2023-24 was approved in February 2023 by City Council. For the FY 2023-24 Surface Seal and Rehabilitation Project, the City with NCE’s help has programmed to surface seal 5.4 centerline miles of roadway (43 sections) and rehabilitate or reconstruct 2.9 centerline miles (15 sections) of streets with an approximate $6.0 million total budget for both projects (includes concrete work, striping, paving, sealing, and up-front soft costs). The

8.a
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Julia Shibko, EIT
Page | 2
scope of work for pavement and civil design services included the necessary tasks to develop construction documents and support the City during bidding and construction phases.

FY 2024/25 Surface Seal and Rehabilitation
City of Martinez, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE has had the privilege of working with the City of Martinez (City) on developing the 5-Year Work Plan (5-year Plan) for pavement resurfacing and rehabilitation work since early 2022 and recently completed the 5-year Plan update for FY2024-25 to FY2028-29 and supported City with Franchise and Public Infrastructure Subcommittee meeting in January 2024.

The 5-year Plan was submitted to Measure D Committee and City Council for review and the final street list for FY2024-25 was approved in February 2024 by City Council. For the FY 2024-25 Surface Seal and Rehabilitation Project, the City with NCE’s help has programmed to surface seal 10.7 centerline miles of roadway (106 sections) and rehabilitate or reconstruct 3.6 centerline miles (40 sections) of streets in downtown area (Zone 3). The total budget is approximately $6.0 million for both projects (includes concrete work, striping, paving, sealing, and up-front soft costs). The construction budget is approximately $5.0 million.

Approximately 10 percent of City’s pavement network will be treated in this project. The scope of work for pavement and civil design services includes the necessary tasks to develop construction documents and support the City during bidding and construction phases.
2025 Cape Seal
City of Vallejo, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE is currently working with City staff to develop a 10-year paving plan with potential bond measure funds for approximately $10 million per year on street network. NCE conducted a field review in late November to identify street candidates for 2025 Cape Seal Project. A total of 8.1 centerline miles of streets with approximately $2.3 million construction cost are included in City’s 2025 Cape Seal Project. NCE will develop construction documents for bidding of the Project in May/June 2025 to allow for construction in late Summer 2025. NCE is also providing bidding support and construction support services.

Annual Paving Phase 43
City of Alameda, CA
NCE is providing civil, pavement, and traffic engineering services for the Annual Paving Phase 43 Project. The project includes a resurfacing program focused on Bay Farm with mostly slurry and cape seals and limited street sections that require mill and overlay and surface reconstruct type treatments. The City would like to complete the project with a total budget of approximately $4 million. For the surface seal street sections, NCE is evaluating the use of rubberized cape seals, slurry seals, microsurfacing, and possibly multi-layer seal with base repairs. Rehabilitation streets will consider a combination of conventional overlays and surface reconstructs, and if warranted or needed may also look at alternative recycle in-place technologies such as Full Depth Reclamation (FDR) and Cold In-place Recycling (CIR).
2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation (st2107)
City of South San Francisco, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE is providing engineering and design services to facilitate a rehabilitation project of all eligible streets west of 101. The 2022 West of 101 Pavement Rehabilitation Project’s goal is to perform deferred maintenance west of 101, outside of the annual surface seal program. The City is responsible for the maintenance and repair of approximately 140 centerline miles, comprised of 33 arterial miles, 39 collector miles, and 68 residential miles. The City utilizes a program of slurry seals, overlays, and surface reconstruction as maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. West of US-101 there are approximately 123 centerline miles, comprised of 23 arterial miles, 35 collector miles, and 65 residential miles. Every two years the City surveys the streets and enters the data into the South San Francisco Pavement Management Program StreetSaver® database program. NCE is responsible for project management, pavement rehabilitation design, plans, specifications, and estimates, and bidding and construction support services.

8.a
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Education
MS, Business Administration,
San Jose State University, 2024
BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose
State University, 2022
Registrations and
Certifications
Engineer-in-Training, EIT
#179018
Affiliations
Chi Epsilon Honor Society
American Society of Civil
Engineers
San Jose State Club Rugby
Joined NCE
2024
Total Years of Experience
2 years
Samuel McGolpin, EIT
Staff Engineer
Samuel McGolpin joined NCE upon graduation, and since then, he has gained experience in preparing design drawings for pavement and curb ramp projects using Civil 3D. He also has experience with collecting field data to improve curb ramps, curb and gutters, base repairs, and existing utilities. His work includes designing roadways and roadway striping, improving curb ramps, creating cost estimates, preparing quantities, and analyzing project sites for existing utilities.

Representative Projects
FY25-26 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvement Project City of Pacifica, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE has developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services. The City has requested NCE to complete the FY 2024/25 Pavement Resurfacing Project with a total construction cost of $1.7 million. The resurfacing includes street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. 2021-2022 Pavement Resurfacing Program
City of Pacifica, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE has developed a 5-Year work plan for the City with surface seal and rehabilitation projects based on the City’s Senate Bill1 funding, as well as pavement management database review and unit cost update. Field reviews were performed to verify pavement conditions and treatments to finalize the work plan. NCE then scheduled a field calibration meeting with City staff to discuss various surface seal applications and base repair criteria. Cost-effective cape seals with leveling courses were designed on residential streets with a lower Pavement Condition Index to prevent water from damaging pavement and help resist reflective cracking. As part of this project, NCE civil and pavement engineering design services included pavement coring, curb/gutter replacement, utility coordination, curb ramp design, drainage improvements, pavement design recommendations, plans, specifications, estimates, and bidding and construction support services.
2025 Surface Seal Project
City of Millbrae, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE worked with the City on its 5-year work plan development in early 2024. The 5-year work plan was developed based on City’s budget, the desire to have a resurfacing project each year, grouping and aggregating by neighborhoods for efficiency of design, construction (less mobilization), future maintenance, and to be able to treat more streets with a limited pavement resurfacing annual budget. Cost-effective rubberized cape seal or multi-layer surface seal will be applied on streets in generally

8.a
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Samuel McGolpin, EIT
Page | 2
very poor to fair condition without severe subgrade failure and slurry seals will be applied to streets in generally fair to good condition in an effort to extend pavement life, address moderately cracked pavement, and improve ride quality. Mill and overlay or surface reconstruction will be utilized on streets with very poor to failed condition, high severity fatigue cracking and/or evidence of problematic subgrade. The City would now like to complete the 2025 Surface Seal Project with a total construction cost of approximately $0.9 million. The resurfacing street list includes the street sections, limits, and other pertinent street attributes. The project includes approximately 2.6 centerline miles of streets that will be surface sealed. The City would like to begin design and complete construction documents for bidding in 2025 and begin construction in 2025 construction season.

FY 2024/25 Surface Seal and Rehabilitation
City of Martinez, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE has had the privilege of working with the City of Martinez (City) on developing the 5-Year Work Plan (5-year Plan) for pavement resurfacing and rehabilitation work since early 2022 and recently completed the 5-year Plan update for FY2024-25 to FY2028-29 and supported City with Franchise and Public Infrastructure Subcommittee meeting in January 2024.

The 5-year Plan was submitted to Measure D Committee and City Council for review and the final street list for FY2024-25 was approved in February 2024 by City Council. For the FY 2024-25 Surface Seal and Rehabilitation Project, the City with NCE’s help has programmed to surface seal 10.7 centerline miles of roadway (106 sections) and rehabilitate or reconstruct 3.6 centerline miles (40 sections) of streets in downtown area (Zone 3). The total budget is approximately $6.0 million for both projects (includes concrete work, striping, paving, sealing, and up-front soft costs). The construction budget is approximately $5.0 million.

Approximately 10 percent of City’s pavement network will be treated in this project. The scope of work for pavement and civil design services includes the necessary tasks to develop construction documents and support the City during bidding and construction phases.

Citywide Surface Treatment Package 6-B
City of San Mateo, CA
Staff Engineer. NCE is providing engineering design services, including civil and pavement engineering, to support the Citywide Street Rehabilitation Package 6-B project. The majority of the street sections included in this project are located in the Hayward Park, North Central, and Shoreview areas as shown on the map to the left. The Project will resurface approximately 3.0 centerline miles of streets by employing conventional overlay methods or cost-effective recycling like Full-Depth Reclamation (FDR) or Coldin-Place Recycling (CIR) treatments with an estimated construction cost of $4.9 million; recommended by the City’s pavement management report. Pavement conditions of selected streets are generally in poor to failed conditions with pavement condition index (PCI) average less than 50 points. The scope of services includes evaluating the condition of the pavement of the street segments, conduct surveys, perform geotechnical investigations, and recommend pavement rehabilitation solutions. NCE will also prepare the basis of design report, preliminary and final design plans, specifications and estimates for City to advertise the project.
2025 CDBG Concrete ADA Ramp Project
City of South San Francisco, CA
Staff Engineer. The City has approximately $800k of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the construction contract of the 2025 CDBG Concrete ADA Ramp Project. The improvement locations will be within the block group area and the areas that overlap with the City’s upcoming resurfacing and rehabilitation projects. NCE is providing pre-design for ramp selection, topographic survey for Cypress and Pine Park, civil design for bid documents, and bidding support and construction support services to the City for the successful completion of the 2025 CDBG Concrete ADA Ramp Project. This project will design up to 80 concrete curb ramps and minor concrete throughout the City as well as an accessible pedestrian path to Cypress Park. The curb ramp locations will be determined during the pre-design task with City’s input.

8.a
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing 4866
-2656-6648 v1-2-

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION

8.a
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Task Description Principal
Project
Manager
Senior
Engineer
Project
Engineer
Staff
Engineer
Field
Technician Clerical
Labor
Expenses Coring
Traffic
Control
Laboratory
Testing
Topographic
Surveying
Reimbursable
Expenses* Total Cost
Rate $360 $290 $240 $205 $180 $135 $125

1. Project Management & Meetings
1A. Project Kick-off Meeting/Progress Meetings 4 16 4 4 4 8,260 $ $ 8,400 100 $ 1B. Utility Coordination 2 1 12 2 3,230 $ $ 3,300 100 $ Sub-Total 4 18 5 0 16 0 6 11,490 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200 $ 11,700 $

2. Pavement Design
2A. Pavement and C & G Condition Survey 2 2 24 16 24 12,100 $ $ 12,500 400 $ 2B. Pavement Coring 2 6 8 2,890 $ 11,000 $ 4,840 $ 6,930 $ 400 $ 26,100 $ 2C. Pavement Design Recommendations 8 2 12 2 6,280 $ $ 6,400 100 $ Sub-Total 8 6 2 42 18 32 0 21,270 $ 11,000 $ 4,840 $ 6,930 $ - $ 900 $ 45,000 $

3. Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E)
3A. Design Data Gathering 2 24 60 16,300 $ $ 17,300 1,000 $ 3B. 60% PS&E 16 12 4 8 210 49,640 $ $ 49,700 100 $ 3C. 90% PS&E 6 6 4 8 75 20,000 $ $ 20,100 100 $
3D. Final (100%) PS&E 4 8 2 65 2 16,190 $ $ 16,400 200 $ Sub-Total 26 28 10 40 410 0 2 102,130 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,400 $ 103,500 $

4. Bidding and Construction Support
4A. Bidding Support Services 2 4 4 4 3,560 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100 $ 3,700 $ 4B. Construction Support Services 2 6 4 16 16 8 10,660 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 500 $ 11,200 $ Sub-Total 4 10 8 16 20 8 0 14,220 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 600 $ 14,900 $ Total 42 62 25 98 464 40 8 149,110 $ 11,000 $ 4,840 $ 6,930 $ - $ 3,100 $ 175,100 $

5. As Needed Professional Services (Optional) $ -
5A. Topographic Survey for Curb Ramps and 3D Design** 4 88 46 2 $ 12,100 14,210 $ $ 200 $ 26,500 Total With Optional Tasks 46 70 33 98 510 40 10 163,320 $ 11,000 $ 4,840 $ 6,930 $ 12,100 $ 3,300 $ 201,600 $ **Assume $550 per ramp of topography survey for curb ramp design provided by the subcontractor. Task 5B includes up to 22 curb ramp locations to be surveyed. A final list of curb ramp locations for a topography survey will be discussed and confirmed by the City. *Reimbursable expenses include travel cost, field data collection supplies, and other miscellaneous expenses related to the project.

City of Pacifica
FY27/28 Pavement Resurfacing and Concrete Improvements Project Fee Estimate
March 4, 2026
Labor Hours

8.a
Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: FY 27-28 NCE Consultant Services Agreement (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing

STREET NAME BEGIN LOCATION END LOCATION
Crenshaw Drive PALMETTO AVE SKYLINE DR/CITY LIMITS
Paradise Drive GOLDEN BAY DR PALMETTO AVE
Crenshaw Court PALMETTO AVE CUL DE SAC
Magellan Court DEL MONTE DR CUL DE SAC
Arcadia Drive DEL MONTE DR CITY LIMITS
Golden Bay Drive PARADISE DR PALMETTO AVE
Forest Park Drive PARADISE DR PALMETTO AVE
Forest Park Court PALMETTO AVE CUL DE SAC
Moon Gate Court FOREST PARK DR CUL DE SAC
Magellan Drive PALMETTO AVE DEL MONTE DR
Del Monte Drive ARCADIA DR MAGELLEN DR
Arcadia Court DEL MONTE DR CUL DE SAC
Edgewood Drive GATEWAY DR SUNSHINE DR
Sunshine Drive EDGEWOOD DR EDGEWOOD DR
Gateway Drive FIRECREST AVE HICKEY BLVD
Gateway Drive HICKEY BLVD SPRINGDALE DR
Gateway Drive SPRINGDALE DR CITY LIMITS/ST HWY 1 OVERPASS Westcliff Court GATEWAY DR CUL DE SAC
El Dorado Drive EDGEWOOD DR SUNSHINE DR
Eastridge Court EASTRIDGE CIRCLE CUL DE SAC
Eastridge Circle GATEWAY DR GATEWAY DR
Parkview Court PARKVIEW CIRCLE CUL DE SAC
Parkview Circle HICKEY BLVD (SOUTH INTERSECTIO HICKEY BLVD (NORTH INTERSECTIO Sea Breeze Court GATEWAY DR CUL DE SAC
Sea Haven Court EDGEWOOD DR CUL DE SAC
Beaumont Boulevard EDNA LN CORAL RIDGE DR
Beaumont Boulevard CORAL RIDGE DR DEAD END
Edna Lane BEAUMONT BLVD FARALLON AVE
Waterford Street CLIFTON RD WINWOOD AVE
Bancroft Way FREMONT AVE BEAUMONT BLVD
Lincoln BONNIE LANE END
Farallon Avenue CHANNING WAY CORAL RIDGE DR
Farallon Avenue HICKEY BLVD CHANNING WAY
Winwood Avenue FREMONT AVE BONNIE LANE
Beaumont Boulevard MONTEREY BLVD EDNA LN
Holiday Court CORAL RIDGE DR CUL DE SAC
Fremont Avenue MONTEREY RD CHANNING WAY
Waterford Street MONTEREY RD CLIFTON RD
Bancroft Way WATERFORD ST FREMONT AVE
Beverly Place CHANNING AVE BEAUMONT BLVD
Channing Way BEAUMONT BLVD FARALLON AVE
Channing Way FREMONT AVE BEAUMONT BLVD
Clifton Road WATERFORD ST BEAUMONT BLVD
West Avalon Drive ESPLANADE PALMETTO AVE
Dolphin Drive WEST AVALON DRIVE CUL DE SAC
Palmetto Avenue - 1670 WEST AVALON DR WEST MANOR DR
West Manor Drive ESPLENADE AVE PALMETTO AVE
Manor Plaza MANOR DR BILL DRAKE WAY
Bill Drake Way ESPLENADE AVE PALMETTO AVE
Coral Ridge Drive BEACHVIEW AVE BEAUMONT BLVD
FY 2027-28 RESURFACING STREET LIST

8.b
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: FY 2027-28 Resurfacing List (6178 : Approval of Consultant Services for FY 2027-28 Pavement Resurfacing Project)

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
4/13/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s CEQA determination and approval of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 for construction of an approximately 3,180-square foot single-family residence with an approximately 668-square foot attached three-car garage and associated improvements on an approximately 26,055-sf undeveloped lot located approximately 330 feet east-northeast of the intersection of Rockaway Beach Avenue and Bay View Road (APN 022-062-550). (1.5 hrs) RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Deny the appeal, affirm the Planning Commission’s approval of Site Development Permit PSD838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24, and find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by adopting the attached resolution, including conditions of approval in Exhibit A to the resolution; and, incorporate all maps and testimony into the record by reference.

STAFF CONTACT:

Samantha Updegrave, Community Development Director
[email protected]
James Lin, Senior Planner
[email protected]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The project proposes the development of an approximately 3,180-square foot single-family residence with a 668 square foot three-car garage and associated improvements on a currently undeveloped, 26,055 square foot undeveloped site in the Rockway Beach neighborhood of Pacifica.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The proposed project includes two or more residential dwellings, i.e. a single family and ADU, and is a “housing development project” that is subject to certain provisions of the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code § 65905.5) and the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) (Government Code §65589.5). Pursuant to the Housing Crisis Act of 2019, a local agency may hold up to five public hearings once an application for a housing development project is deemed complete. The HAA limits the City’s ability to deny or condition housing projects that comply with applicable and objective standards. Further, a proposed housing development project can only be denied if supported by substantial evidence in the record that the project would result in a specific and adverse impact on public health or safety that is significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable (Section 65589.5(j)).

The meeting on March 13, 2026, is the fifth public hearing since the application was deemed complete. A summary of the project history, decisions, and links to the staff reports with additional details are provided in Table 1.
9 Packet Pg. 329
Pacifica City Council 2
April 13, 2026
DIRECTION FROM CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 23, 2026:

Revised Renderings
At the City Council meeting on February 23, 2026, the Council requested additional renderings from the applicant as a visual aid to inform their deliberations at the continued hearing.

Specifically, they requested a bird’s-eye view of the subject site in three dimensions to illustrate the building massing in relation to site grading, as well as a revised driveway rendering showing the accurate slope, retaining walls, guardrails, driveway curb, and windows of nearby residences.

Renderings are a visual aid and cannot be used to demonstrate compliance with objective standards. As detailed in the Planning Commission staff report dated December 1, 2025, and further affirmed in the City Council staff report dated February 9, 2026, the proposed project is consistent with the applicable objective development standards of the R-1-H (Single-Family Residential Hillside) zoning district.

On March 30, 2026, the applicant submitted updated renderings (Attachment C). A revised driveway rendering shown as Figure 1 in this staff report. Additional requested renderings for the bird’s-eye view of the subject site in three dimensions to illustrate building massing in relation to site grading, as well as revised driveway renderings provided by the Applicant may be found in Attachment C of the staff report.

Figure 1: Driveway Rendering
Table 1: Project Hearings
Hearing Date Hearing Body Decision Staff Report
April 1, 2024 Planning
Commission
Continued to Date Uncertain Link
December 1, 2025 Planning
Commission
Approved; Decision Appealed to the
City Council on December 11, 2025.

Link
February 9, 2026 City Council Voted 5-0 to deny the appeal, uphold Planning Commission approval subject
to modification of conditions of
approval for final approval on the
February 23, 2026, meeting.

Link
February 23, 2026 City Council Conducted deliberations on conditions of approval, re-opened the public
hearing on the appeal to take
additional public comments, and
continued to Date Uncertain to conduct
further deliberations on the appeal.

Link
9 Packet Pg. 330
Pacifica City Council 3
April 13, 2026
Modifications to Conditions
During deliberations during the February 23, 2026, hearing, the Council directed the following revisions to the Conditions of Approval. These have been incorporated into the conditions in the attached Resolution and are shown below. The underlined text below has been added to the conditions.
• Condition of Approval Number 45: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit involving grading, retaining walls, or slope disturbance, the applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement with the City to require the completion of the retaining walls, drainage, and other related improvements (“Retaining Wall Improvements”) and shall provide security in an amount necessary to complete the Retaining Wall Improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The agreement shall be recorded against the property prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit and shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney.
• Condition of Approval Number 48: No grubbing or tree removal shall take place prior to: (1) issuance of a grading permit, (2) issuance of a building permit or (23) recordation of the improvement agreement required per Condition of Approval No. 45.

CITY COUNCIL ACTION
This item is being presented for City Council consideration and constitutes the fifth and final hearing within the timeframes established by the California Housing Accountability Act. City Council must render a final decision on the proposed project at this hearing, either by approval or denial supported by the required findings consistent with the California Housing Accountability Act.

Pursuant to Pacifica Municipal Code (PMC) sections 9-4.3602 and 9-4.3208, the Council may approve, deny or modify the Site Development Permits, after considering the Appeal. If the Council determines that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Planning 9 Packet Pg. 331
Pacifica City Council 4
April 13, 2026
Commission’s approval of the Site Development Permit, the Council should deny the Appeal by adopting the attached Resolution in Attachment A. The Council’s review of the Project on appeal is considered a de novo review. Findings for approval of the Project are included are included in the draft resolution in Attachment A.

If the Council decides to uphold the Appeal and deny the Project, Council will need provide the findings for denial set forth under Section 65589.5(j), supported by substantial evidence, for staff to include in the resolution for denial.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) REVIEW
Staff incorporate the analysis in Appeal Point Nos. 7 and 8 by reference. As discussed, staff’s analysis of the proposed Project supports a conclusion that the Project qualifies as a Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” categorical exemptions under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, and no exceptions to the exemption applies.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend approval of the Resolution Denial of Appeal and upholding Planning Commission’s CEQA determination and approval of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

As noted above, the project qualifies as a housing development project and pursuant to the Housing Crisis Act of 2019, a local agency may hold up to five public hearings once an application is deemed complete. The City Council meeting on April 13, 2026, is the fifth public hearing since the application was deemed complete, therefore the Council must take action to either deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission approval or uphold the appeal and reverse the Planning Commission approval.

Further, as noted above, the housing development project is subject to certain provisions of the Housing Accountability Act (HAA). Because the project complies with applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards, Government Code Section 65589.5(j) applies to the project.

The City Council has the discretion to approve, deny, or modify the request according to the zoning findings, provided the action does not reduce the project density or effectively deny the project by making it infeasible, unless the Council is also able to make the required findings for denial set forth under Section 65589.5(j).

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The project is not directly associated with an item on the City Council’s Work Plan. It is the City Council’s normal governance process to hear and determine the appeals of Planning Commission actions under the enforcement or interpretation of the Zoning Regulations.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No direct fiscal impact. Processing costs for this item are paid by the applicant. 9 Packet Pg. 332
Pacifica City Council 5
April 13, 2026
ORIGINATED BY:

Community Development Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (PDF)
Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (PDF) Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (PDF) 9 Packet Pg. 333
Pacifica City Council 6
April 13, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. __________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PACIFICA DENYING THE APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION AND APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PSD-838-18 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TP-4-24, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 3,180-SQUARE FOOT (SF) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 668-SF ATTACHED

THREE-CAR GARAGE AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 26,055-SF, UNDEVELOPED LOT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET EASTNORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCKAWAY BEACH AVENUE AND BAY VIEW ROAD (APN 022-062-550); AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
______________________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, Robert Benda and John Spenker (“Owner”) have submitted an application to the City of Pacifica (City) for the construction of a 3,180 square foot (sf) single-family residence with an approximately 668-sf attached three-car garage, an approximately 680-sf and associated improvements on an approximately 26,055-sf, undeveloped lot located approximately 330 feet east-northeast of the intersection of Rockaway Beach Avenue and Bay View Road (APN 022-062-550) (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project site is located in the R-1-H (Single-Family Residential Hillside) Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the Project’s location in the R-1-H Zoning District requires approval of a Site Development Permit prior to issuance of a building permit per Pacifica Municipal Code (PMC) Section 9-

4.953, with the objective of ensuring that new structures and streets are designed to protect the visual and natural resource qualities of the hillsides and to minimize adverse impacts on existing neighborhoods, drainage, traffic, land stability, and natural resources; and WHEREAS, the Project requires approval of a Tree Removal Permit per PMC Section 4-12.04, whereby any person who desires to remove a protected tree or City tree shall obtain a tree removal permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on April 1, 2024, which was continued to December 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, in continuing the public hearing for the Project, the Planning Commission directed the Applicant and the City staff to provide additional information on erosion control, drainage, additional renderings and details to the plans, preliminary title report, easement documents, and updated geotechnical reports; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant provided the additional information and studies about the Project to City staff in accordance with the direction of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, after holding a duly noticed public hearing on December 1, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-017 approving Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Removal Permit TP-4-24; and
WHEREAS, an appeal was filed by Vera Toth-Fejel on behalf of “Coalition for a Safe Pacifica” 9 Packet Pg. 334
Pacifica City Council 7
April 13, 2026
(“Appellant”) on December 11, 2025, in opposition to the Planning Commission’s action (“Appeal”); and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on February 9, 2026. At the hearing, the City Council voted to deny the appeal but directed the City Manager to make modifications to the Conditions of Approval (COA), return to Council for final approval, and continued the meeting to a date certain of February 23, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed continued public hearing on February 23, 2026, wherein the Council re-opened the public hearing, deliberated on the COAs, requested that the Applicant provide additional and revised renderings of the subject site and the revised driveway showing the accurate slope, retaining walls, guardrails, driveway curb, and windows of the residences, and continued the hearing to date uncertain to further deliberate on the Appeal; and WHEREAS, on March 30, 2026, in response to the Council’s request, the Applicant submitted the additional and revised renderings to City staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pacifica held a duly noticed public hearing on April 13, 2026, at which time it considered all oral and documentary evidence presented relating to the Appeal, and all testimony and documents into the record by reference and moved to approve the Resolution denying the Appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s approval of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Removal Permit TP-4-24, subject to conditions of approval as amended by Council.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pacifica as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and material to this Resolution.

2. In making its findings, the City Council relied upon and hereby incorporates by reference all correspondence, staff reports, and other related materials.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby deny the Appeal based upon all of the reasons set forth in the Staff Report and evidence presented during the hearing on appeal and upholds the Planning Commission’s Approval on December 1, 2025, approving Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Removal Permit TP-4-24, subject to conditions, for the construction of an approximately 3,180-square foot (sf) single-family residence with an approximately 668-sf attached threecar garage and associated imrovements, along with modified conditions of approval, and makes the following findings pertaining to its denial of the appeal of the Planning Commission’s action to approve the Project:

Appeal Issue No. 1
“The difficulty of developing the lot is a result of choices of the landowner and their predecessors in interest.”
The appeal letter contends that because the original parcel was not created as a flag lot and had its primary frontage on a paper street (Calera Terrace), that limitations on development arise from a 1974 easement granted by prior owners to Lot 5, not from the physical condition of the land. As such, the appellant asserts that any hardship requiring a variance is self-created and that self-induced hardship does not justify exemption from land use regulations or granting variances.

Staff Response: The Planning Commission did not approve a Variance, nor does the project request or require approval of a variance or an exemption from any applicable land use regulations. The project would meet all applicable objective development standards in the Pacifica Municipal Code (PMC) that are required for new construction in the Single Family Residential Hillside (R-1-H) Zoning District pursuant to PMC Section 9-4.953.

The project site is a flag lot with a 25-foot wide and 120-foot long “flagpole” from Bayview Street to the 9 Packet Pg. 335
Pacifica City Council 8
April 13, 2026
wider lot area, and has a legal right to access the site from Bayview. Based on the most recent 2023 easement documents, the adjacent property at 171 Bayview Road has revised a landscape easement across a portion of the flagpole area that would allow for the site access to be widened by 6’-0” northward.

See Appeal Point No. 2, Finding 9-4.3204(a)(9), for discussion of the fire access.

This appeal point is not applicable because the applicant has not requested a variance.

Appeal Issue No. 2
“Five findings for denial were met under the Site Development Permit.” The appeal letter claims that the project meets five of the nine site development permit findings that require denial of the project: PMC Section 9-4.3204(a)(3), (4), (6), (8) and (9).

For detailed findings related to the Site Development Permit, refer to the Planning Commission staff report, dated December 1, 2025
<https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1618&Inline=True>. a. Appeal Claim Regarding Finding PMC 9-4.3204(a)(3): “That insufficient landscaped areas have been reserved for the purposes of separating or screening service and storage areas from the street and adjoining building sites, breaking up large expanses of paved areas, and separating or screening parking lots from the street and adjoining building areas from paved areas to provide access from buildings to open areas.”
The appeal letter claims that the paved driveway is not designed or located in a manner that sufficiently breaks up or softens the visual impact of the hardscape, and that the ADU is not screened from neighboring Lot 16.

Staff Response:
(1.) Driveway: Sufficient landscape areas have been reserved for the project. The proposed service and storage areas will be entirely contained within the residence and will not be visible from the street or adjacent properties. The proposed landscaping, combined with the remaining undeveloped vegetated area, covers more than 50 percent of the site, exceeding the 20 percent requirement for landscaping per PMC 9-

4.402(i).The vehicular access is treated as Fire Department access road (see Appeal Point No. 2, Finding 9-4.3204(a)(9)). The proposed project would provide legal and conforming vehicular access to the housing development project. During review of the planning entitlements, the applicant considered multiple designs for the access, including a planted center strip on the paved driveway and the use of an open-faced block with grass infill (e.g., turf block or Grasscrete), but the designs were not feasible due to the fire access requirements. The applicant worked closely with the North County Fire Authority (NCFA) on access and site design and developed a driveway that meets the applicable fire requirements. The applicant prepared a revised rendering for the appeal that more accurately reflects the proposal and reduced visual impacts of the current design, shown below in Figure 1. To address the neighbors’ concern raised during the public hearing regarding the aesthetics of the driveway, the Planning Commission also added Condition of Approval 43 to ensure that the applicant and staff “make a good faith effort to redesign the project driveway to be more aesthetically pleasing,” noting that final design approval is outside the Commission’s and City’s purview.

Figure 1. Driveway Rendering
9 Packet Pg. 336
Pacifica City Council 9
April 13, 2026
Figure 1. Driveway Rendering
(2.) Accessory Dwelling Unit (Figure 2): Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) are required to be processed ministerially pursuant to State law and PMC Section 9-4.451(b), and are not subject to discretionary review, including the site development findings. However, the ADU complies with all applicable objective standards. For example, the minimum rear setback required for an ADU is 4 feet and 20 feet is proposed. The height of the ADU is lower than the existing residence on Lot 16. In addition to compliance of PMC Section 4-12.04(e) for replacement tree plantings, the applicant has provided additional shrubs, vines, and retaining wall plantings between the ADU and Lot 16 to reduce potential privacy and visual impacts.

Figure 2. ADU Height and Landscaping Plan
In conclusion, the design of the driveway is limited by the fire access requirements, and the project has been conditioned to explore additional measures to reduce potential impacts while ensuring life-safety access. Even if the ADU were subject to discretionary findings, which is prohibited by state and local law, 9 Packet Pg. 337
Pacifica City Council 10 April 13, 2026
the proposed design addresses the concerns raised by the appellant. Further, The project would provide 58 percent of lot area as landscape and vegetated undisturbed areas, where only 20 percent is required, and incorporates trees, shrubs, vines, and other plantings. There is sufficient landscape area reserved for the project. Thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
b. Appeal Claim Regarding Finding 9-4.3204(a)(4): “That the proposed development, as set forth on the plans, will unreasonably restrict or cut out light and air on the property and on other property in the neighborhood, or will hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of land and buildings in the neighborhood, or impair the value thereof.”
The appeal letter claims that the proposed layout is inconsistent with the code definitions of front and side lot lines, and that the elevated, paved driveway and retaining wall along the property line with Lot 7 does not comply with required setbacks and its placement would require a variance. Finally, the letter contends that the project’s driveway and placement of the house and ADU would block sunlight and restrict airflow to Lot 7 and Lot 16. The appellant also notes that story poles have not been provided, limiting the ability of neighbors and the Commission to fully assess these impacts.

Staff Response: The front and side lot lines are correctly identified, and the fire access complies with the applicable requirements and is permitted within required setbacks. Further, although light and air impacts are not objective standards, the potential impacts have been minimized to the extent feasible.

The front lot line is the western lot abutting Bay View Road (bottom of the “flagpole”) and the western lot line abutting Lot 7 (bottom of the “flag”). The rear lot line is the eastern lot line, and all other lot lines are sides. The front and side setbacks are properly identified, and the buildings exceed the minimum setbacks, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Lot Lines and Required Setbacks
9 Packet Pg. 338
Pacifica City Council 11 April 13, 2026
1: Garages require a 20’ front setback; 34’-3” proposed 2: ADUs have a maximum 4’ rear setback; 20’-3” proposed Although a retaining wall meets the general definition of “structure” (anything constructed on the ground), there are specific provisions in the PMC that address fences, hedges, and walls and establish how they are regulated. PMC Section 9-4.2502 regulates fences, hedges, walls, and screen plantings located within the required setbacks. The applicable code does not impose setback requirements but regulates the height of retaining walls when located in a required setback, to between 3 to 6 feet, unless otherwise required by law. In this case, the retaining walls are required to provide fire access to the site and can exceed the height. Regardless, the fire access was designed with retaining walls that range from approximately 2 to 3 feet along the southern flagpole lot line, with one section of retaining wall at 5 feet in the southwest corner, located well over 30 feet from the house on Lot 7. The retaining walls in the 9 Packet Pg. 339
Pacifica City Council 12 April 13, 2026
northern portion of the flagpole are outside of the required setbacks. The design, including the slope, is required by law to meet fire access requirements, and the height of the retaining walls within the required setbacks substantially comply with the PMC Section 9-4.2503. Further, there are no setback requirements for fire access roadways or driveways.

Although light and air impacts are not an objective standard, the increased setbacks from property lines would minimize potential light and air impacts to surrounding properties more so than a project built to maximize the allowances for this district. The proposed residential use is consistent with the use in the vicinity and the buildings constructed would be scaled down with architectural features and detailing.

This approach ensures that the project does not impede or discourage appropriate development and use of land and buildings in the area, nor diminish their value. Thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
c. Appeal Claim Regarding Finding 9-4.3204(a)(6): “That the proposed development will excessively damage or destroy natural features, including trees, shrubs, creeks, and rocks, and the natural grade of the site.”
The appeal letter claims that the grading work will damage the natural grade of the site.

Staff Response: The project does not damage or destroy natural features and has been designed to meet standards for fire access while minimizing grading and preserving the natural slope to the greatest extent feasible, in coordination with NCFA. The development is set back on the hillside and incorporates a series of retaining walls supporting cuts from the north to south and containing fill for terraces to the south, facilitating construction of the residence and associated improvements. Landscaping beyond minimum requirements is proposed to integrate the buildings with the natural environment.

The overall site and building designs follows the slope of the site to the maximum extent feasible and reduce excavation requirements. The project balances the need for fire access and site development with efforts to preserve natural features and the site’s existing grade, consistent with the PMC requirements and intent of the Design Standards. For additional analysis on this Finding, refer to the project findings in Attachment A and the December 1, 2025 Planning Commission staff report <https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1618&Inline=True>. The submitted geotechnical engineering investigations conclude that the project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint upon implementation of the recommendations contained in the accompanying reports, which are to be incorporated into the final plans and implemented during construction, per Condition 17 of the project. The project does not damage or destroy natural features and thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
d. Appeal Claim Regarding Finding 9-4.3204(a)(8): “That the proposed development is inconsistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.”
The appeal letter states that the proposed project is inconsistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines <https://www.cityofpacifica.org/home/showpublisheddocument/2394/637838931965700000>, including A.2 Building Location, B.2 Scale, B.6 Privacy, and C.6 Parking Areas.

Staff Response: The project responds appropriately to the City’s Design Guidelines. The Design Guidelines are advisory in nature and, unlike zoning regulations, do not contain explicit standards for determining strict compliance. They address significant elements of project design that, when balanced overall, result in the best possible site layout and building architecture for a project. An applicant may 9 Packet Pg. 340
Pacifica City Council 13 April 13, 2026
propose a project which complies with some but not all guidelines and still be consistent. While the Council has the discretion to determine the appropriate balance and priorities of the guidelines for a project, the guidelines do not contain objective standards and cannot be imposed in a manner that effectively denies or reduces the density of a “housing development project pursuant to the Housing Accountability Act. As the project qualifies as a “housing development project” under the Housing Accountability Act, the Council’s discretion regarding subjective standards from the Guidelines is governed by the Housing Accountability Act.

The project incorporates design features that reduce the perceived mass and integrate the project with surrounding homes while preserving views, privacy, and solar access to the greatest extent possible. The applicant has also worked extensively with NCFA to design the vehicular and fire access. For additional analysis on compliance with the Design Guidelines, refer to the project findings in Attachment A and the December 1, 2025 Planning Commission staff report
<https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1618&Inline=True>.

The project has responded to the Design Guidelines and complies with all applicable objective development standards of the R-1-H zoning district, including height, setbacks, lot coverage, and offstreet parking, as well as ADU standards. Thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
e. Appeal Claim Regarding Finding 9-4.3204(a)(9): “That the proposed development is inconsistent with the General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, or other applicable laws of the City.” The appeal letter raises three points under this criterion. First, that the proposed driveway does not comply with PMC Section 9-4.2813(i), which limits the width of driveways on lots with 50 feet or more of frontage to 50 percent of the frontage. Second, that the proposed driveway does not comply with a minimum 20-foot-wide driveway for emergency vehicle access required by the California Fire Code because the an18-foot wide driveway is proposed, and the Zoning Ordinance does not provide for a variance. Third, the appellant references the seismic and geologic hazards identified in the Safety Element of the General Plan and states that the project is inconsistent with the guiding policies related to landslides, liquefaction, erosion, and natural drainage.

Staff Response:
(1.) Driveway width: The vehicular access is consistent with PMC Section 9-4.2813(e)(1), which requires that when any portion of an exterior wall is located more than 150 feet from Fire Department vehicle access, the driveway must comply with applicable provisions of the California Fire Code. The vehicular access for the project is a Fire Department access roadway, subject to the standards of fire code. The project’s driveway complies with both the fire access requirements and with the residential driveways standards that allow driveways between 10 feet to 20 feet in width (see PMC Section 9-4.2813(e)).

Further, the code provision noted in the appeal would not apply to this site because the lot frontage is only 25 feet and does not exceed 50 feet. Thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met. (2.) Fire Access: The proposed fire access is 18 feet wide, whereas 20 feet is the standard pursuant to the Fire Code. The applicant worked with NCFA and the proposed design was reviewed and approved by the Fire Marshal as an Alternative Materials and Methods Request (AMMR). This allows for an 18-foot-wide driveway and fire apparatus turnaround based on site-specific conditions and compliance with applicable fire safety standards. As the NCFA has approved the access and on-site turnaround to meet the fire access requirements, staff relies on the Fire Marshal’s determination that the approved driveway configuration provides adequate emergency vehicle access for the project. See Condition of Approval No. 36 (Attachment A, Exhibit A). Variances are only applicable to the Zoning Ordinance and are not applied to other codes and regulations. NCFA has approved an AMMR for the width of the access and a 9 Packet Pg. 341
Pacifica City Council 14 April 13, 2026
turnaround, in compliance with the applicable regulations. Thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met.
(3.) Geologic Hazards: The applicant originally submitted a geotechnical report, prepared in 2011, concluding that the project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Following a request from the Planning Commission to further evaluate the previously prepared report, the applicant retained another firm in 2024 to review the initial geotechnical report and to conduct a new investigation, including borings and recommendations for grading, foundations, retaining walls, and drainage (Attachment G).

Both geotechnical investigations concluded that the project is consistent with the guiding policies for seismic and geologic hazards. Thus, contrary to the appeal claim, this finding is not met.

In conclusion, the driveway / fire access complies with applicable requirements, and geotechnical investigations conclude that project is consistent with the guiding policies for seismic and geologic hazards, therefore the project is consistent with the General Plan and other applicable laws of the City.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.

Appeal Issue No.3
“The Project was not in compliance with public notice requirements.” The appeal letter states that the public hearing notices for the December 1, 2025, Planning Commission hearing were mailed after the post marked date of November 20, 2025. It states that residents did not start receiving the notices until November 28, 2025, and contends that the City therefore did not comply with the required 10-day noticing period. The appellant further argues that the notices were received after the Thanksgiving holiday, when people may have been out of town, and that mailing notices immediately prior to the holiday failed to meet the spirit of the noticing requirement.

Staff Response: Pursuant to PMC Section 9-4.3203, the City must publish hearing notices in a newspaper of general circulation and mailing notices not less than 10 days prior to the hearing date to the owners and residents of property within a 500 foot-radius of the project site. It also states that “the failure of any person to receive such notice shall not invalidate the site development permit proceedings.” The City published notice in the San Mateo Daily Journal on November 21, 2025, and mailed notices on November 20, 2025, as postmarked. While the appellant does not explicitly accuse the City of falsifying the postage meter or drop off date, the City disputes any implication, direct or indirect, that mailing dates were falsified, and maintains that the notices were handled accurately and in accordance with standard practice on November 20, 2025, which was 12 calendar days prior to the meeting. The City has no control over the processing, handling, or delivery of notices once they are provided to the USPS, nor is it reasonable to expect delivery that aligns with an individual’s travel plans.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.

Appeal Issue No. 4
“Violation of the Brown Act”
The appeal letter states that the Planning Commission violated the Brown Act by relying on supplemental materials distributed after agenda publication, specifically, the 2023 easement granted by the subject site to a neighboring lot. The appellant states that nearby residents were not able to adequately consider the materials, seek independent review, provide feedback, and prepare questions and comments for the December 1 meeting, and that the Commission cannot rush through a controversial, unusual, and unsafe 9 Packet Pg. 342
Pacifica City Council 15 April 13, 2026
development without at least providing nearby residents and interested parties with adequate notice and information.

Staff Response: The Brown Act requires that an initial staff report or similar document containing an executive summary and the staff recommendation, if any, relating to that agenda item is made available for public inspection at the office or location posted at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting, and that agenda items be described with sufficient specificity to inform the public of the business to be conducted. The initial staff report and agenda was published online on November 26, 2025, at 2:29 PM, approximately 124 hours prior to the meeting. Further, the Brown Act does not prohibit the distribution of supplemental materials following agenda posting but requires that it be made available for public inspection at the time of distribution. At the meeting, printed copies of the easement were provided to the Commissioners, included in the publicly available agenda binder, and copies were available at the table with the extra agendas. In addition to the easement being made publicly available at the time of distribution to the Commission on December 1, 2025, it was also previously included as a publicly available supplemental exhibit attached to the Planning Commission staff report for the April 1, 2024, hearing <https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1524&Inline=True>. As such, the Planning Commission complied with the Brown Act and no violation occurred.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.

Appeal Issue No 5
“Project not in Compliance with Setback Requirements.”
The appeal letter restates Appeal Point No. 2 regarding the setback requirements for retaining walls.

Staff Response: As noted under Appeal Point No. 2, Exclusion Criterion 9-4.3204(a)(4), there are no setback requirements for fire access roadways, driveways, or retaining walls.

Appeal Point No. 6
“Other Grounds for Appeal”
The appeal letter raises six sub-issues under this point. a. Failure to Consider or Pursue Alternatives. The Planning Commission failed to further investigate project design alternatives such as developing the paper street Calera Terrace.

Staff Response: The Planning Commission has purview over discretionary permits for “private development plans for the City in accordance with the State Planning Law and the City's established development review standards and processes.” Developing Calera Terrace to provide frontage for the project would constitute a substantially different project and was not part of the proposed project. Neither state law nor the City’s established development review standards require consideration of project alternatives for discretionary projects that are exempt from environmental review. An environmental impact report (EIR) must describe a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6(a)), but there is no such requirement to evaluate project alternatives where a project is exempt from CEQA review. Even if the Planning Commission were to have considered such an alternative, it would involve significant construction and grading beyond what is required for the proposed single-family residence, resulting in additional impacts, including disruption to neighboring properties and immediate area. The current proposal represents a less impactful development approach.

This appeal point is not applicable because consideration of a project alternative is not required.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning 9 Packet Pg. 343
Pacifica City Council 16 April 13, 2026
Commission’s decision.
b. Inconsistency with Plans and Rendering. There appear to be significant inconsistencies between the applicant’s architectural plans and renderings, such as with respect to height and placement of the proposed house. Without accurate rendering and story poles, neither nearby residents nor the Commission or its staff could accurately gauge, analyze, or provide feedback on what exactly applicant propose to build.

Staff Response: The City does not require story poles for any development projects, as reflected in the state-mandated application submittal checklist. As discussed above under Appeal Point No. 2(b) and shown in Figure 1, the applicant has provided a more accurate rendering of the driveway. The two other renderings showing the building from the southwest (Bay View Road) and northwest (Rockaway) appear accurate in both height and placement. Further, even if the renderings were inaccurate, the proposed project meets all applicable objective development standards, including height, and the placement of the proposed house would comply with setbacks, exceeding the requirements from all lot lines.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
(c) Inconsistency with Size and Scale of the Home. The size of the project is substantially larger than the surrounding homes.

Staff Response: As previously discussed, the subject property is larger than surrounding lots - over 26,000 square feet where 5,000 square feet is the minimum lot area, allowing the proposed building to meet zoning standards while maintaining appropriate scale relative to the site. Based on compliance with these objective standards established in the City’s Zoning Ordinance and the lot size, the proposed building’s height, bulk and mass, and location are appropriate for the project site. This issue is adequately addressed by local and State law. Further, cursory calculations based on review of Google Earth images and Zillow, the lot coverage on neighboring properties averages approximately 22 percent. The proposed project would have a lot coverage of approximately 15 percent (excluding the ADU pursuant to PMC Section 9-

4.453(c)(5)), which is comparable to neighboring sites. Additionally, there are other properties zoned R1-H in the area that have been approved by the Planning Commission and City Council for houses with similar floor area, including a project known as “Lots 4-12 Oddstad Way” for a 3,800 square foot singlefamily residence on a vacant lot.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
(d.) Neighbor Access Required for Construction. The Planning Commission did not consider how the applicant plans to build without access to neighbor’s property.

Staff Response: The construction of the proposed project will not involve accessing or encroaching the adjacent neighbor’s lots, which will be verified through building permit review. This issue is adequately addressed by governing building codes during construction permit review and legally permitted construction activities.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
(e.) Inadequate Analysis by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission did not analyze the increase in heavy construction vehicle traffic on Bayview Road and surrounding streets. This will result in degradation of road quality and the blocking of a one-lane road used for ingress, egress (including for safety and emergency vehicles) and evacuation of residents in the case of fire or earthquake. 9 Packet Pg. 344
Pacifica City Council 17 April 13, 2026
Staff Response: The City has a standard requirements related to construction vehicles based on the amount of grading. This would be required to be implemented for this project and have been incorporated as Condition of Approval No. 35. These include a requirement for prior approval of any lane closures from Public Works, coordination with the Pacifica Police and Fire departments and Recology, and written notice to affected properties. The standard Traffic Control Plan requirements adequately address ingress, egress, and evacuation during construction. This issue was adequately addressed by Planning Commission, as well as in local regulations.

Further, the Planning Commission added Condition of Approval No. 42 which requires the applicant to submit a pre-construction video survey documenting all existing conditions of all public improvement for Bayview Road and Rockaway Beach Avenue, to ensure restoration of any construction-related damage.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
(f.) Additional Information on Security or Bond. The Planning Commission should have provided more information or a formula for calculating the security for nearby residents have adequate assurance that construction will be completed safely and any potential damage will be addressed.

Staff Response: The form and amount of any security or bond are determined by the City Engineer in accordance with standard practice, tailored to the scope and potential impacts of construction. The Planning Commission cannot specify these details, as it is not within their purview. In order to address community concerns, Condition of Approval 45 was added to ensure that construction of retaining walls and other related improvements would be completed should the project be abandoned mid-way, while providing appropriate oversight by the City Engineer. This appeal point was adequately addressed by Planning Commission.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.

Appeal Issue No. 7
“The project description is inadequate under California Environmental Quality Act.” The appeal letter claims that the project description for analyzing compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was not stable or consistent because it had changed over time, including the addition of conditions of approval 41-45 introduced by the Planning Commission at their meeting on December 1, 2025. The appeal letter claims that as a result, input from the public and review by the Planning Commission was inadequate.

Staff Response: Under CEQA, a project description should contain a “general description” of the project’s “main features,” and other information sufficient to foster a complete and informative evaluation of the project’s environmental impacts.

While a project description must be stable and consistent throughout the document, a requirement for a consistent project description does not mean that the project cannot change as it proceeds through CEQA review and other stages in the approval process. The project description should allow for the flexibility needed to respond to unforeseeable events and changing conditions that could affect the project’s final design. A lead agency may also approve changes to a project without revising the project description if such changes do not result in increased environmental impacts.

Here, the project description’s “main features” have been stable throughout the development process, including at the time of staff review and analysis and at the time of Planning Commission review and action. At all times, the project has consisted of a single-family residence, an attached garage, and an 9 Packet Pg. 345
Pacifica City Council 18 April 13, 2026
ADU. Any project changes have been minor and have not impaired a complete and informative evaluation of the project’s environmental impacts. The project remains consistent with the project description, as discussed in further detail under Appeal Point No. 8, because it has not changed for purposes of CEQA or project review. The conditions of approval added by the Planning Commission have not fundamentally changed the project and have not caused the project to be removed from the scope of CEQA exemption or result in any significant environmental impacts. No mitigation measures have been imposed, as further discussed under Appeal Point No. 8. The Planning Commission relied on the accurate project description for determining the CEQA categorical exemption.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.

Appeal Issue No. 8
“The project is not exempt from California Environmental Quality Act” The appeal letter claims three reasons that the project is not eligible for a categorical exemption from CEQA and that an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact is required. a. Conditions of Approval: The appeal letter claims that the Planning Commission improperly relied on conditions of approval added at the meeting on December 1, 2025, as mitigation measures to support a categorical exemption. The appellant claims that the Conditions of Approval added by the Commission at the public hearing were actually mitigation measures, and the Planning Commission improperly relied on to apply CEQA Categorical Exemption to the project.

Staff Response: They conditions of approval added by the Planning Commission were not mitigation measures to reduce significant environmental impacts. As explained in detail below, the majority of these conditions were added to allay public concerns and provide additional assurances to ensure that the Project complies with already applicable state and local regulations or the standards City conditions for a development Project. Regulations of general applicability that will prevent a significant impact from occurring (and conditions of approval requiring compliance with such regulations) are not treated as mitigation measures. Similarly, a feature built into the design or operation of a project is not treated as a mitigation measure that would preclude a categorical exemption.

The conditions of approval added at the meeting on December 1, 2025, do not constitute mitigation measures and are unrelated to the Class 3 “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures” Categorical Exemption from CEQA. The conditions of approval are intended to ensure compliance with regulations of general applicability, such as standard requirements in the PMC, state law, and other regulatory requirements. Discussed below are the challenged conditions and staff’s analysis confirming they are not mitigation measures.

Condition 41 states:
• Condition 41. Prior to the issuance of building or grading permits, hydraulic calculations along with a letter from the engineer of record indicating that the proposed storm drain system does not increase runoff above the pre-development condition shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The on-site drainage system shall be designed to detain on-site all flows in excess of the existing flows during a 100-year frequency storm. The detention systems shall be designed to detain water only during peak flows.

Staff Response: This condition was not adopted to mitigate specific environmental impacts expected to result from the project. Rather, this condition was included in response to public concerns raised at the Commission hearing requiring an additional method for the project to demonstrate that the Project’s design for stormwater management is complying with the City’s Storm Water Management and 9 Packet Pg. 346
Pacifica City Council 19 April 13, 2026
Discharge Control Ordinance requirements (Chapter 12 of the PMC) and other regulatory requirements (e.g. NPDES Permit No. CAS612008). Under the NPDES permit requirements, the Project is already required to be designed to detain on-site all flows in excess of the existing flows during a 100-year frequency storm, and a condition requiring the applicant to demonstrate that effectiveness of the project’s design to meet this regulatory requirement is a standard engineering stormwater detention requirement applied for all single-family residential building permits Condition 42 states:
• Condition 42. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a preconstruction video survey documenting all existing site conditions and all public improvements limits of Bayview Road and Rockaway Beach Avenue, including but not limited to pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, drainage structures, utility boxes, adjacent landscaping, and any other visible surface features. The video survey shall be submitted electronically to the City Engineer for review and acceptance prior to permit issuance. Any damage to Bayview Road and Rockaway Beach Avenue caused by the project shall be repaired by applicant at the applicant’s expense.

Staff Response: This condition is not a mitigation measure because it was not adopted to mitigate specific environmental impacts expected to result from the project. This condition requires documentation of existing site and public improvements to assign responsibility in the event of any project-related damage to public improvements. The project is not expected to damage public improvements. It is a condition to implement some of the PMC provisions that make the project applicant responsible for any damages or work done within public improvements, should they occur, and is not a mitigation measure.

Condition 43 states:
• Condition 43. Applicant, Planning staff, Engineering staff, and NCFA staff shall make a good faith effort to redesign the project driveway to be more aesthetically pleasing.

Staff Response: This condition is not a mitigation measure because it was not adopted to mitigate specific environmental impacts expected to result from the project. This condition was imposed to address community concerns, and memorializes staff’s commitment to seek additional options to create a more visually appealing driveway while also meeting fire access requirements as determined by NCFA. The Commission noted that final design approval of the driveway was highly subjective and was “more aesthetically pleasing”. As the City’s subjective imposition of driveway design condition of approval was for aesthetic purposes and there is not evidence that there are aesthetic impacts under CEQA. As a result, the condition is not a mitigation measure because it was not adopted to mitigate specific environmental impacts expected to result from the project. There is no substantial evidence in the record that the project will result in aesthetic impacts; argument, speculation, and unsubstantiated lay opinion do not constitute substantial evidence. Because there is no evidence of aesthetic impacts under CEQA, this condition of approval is not intended to “reduce” any environmental impact. For all of these reasons, Condition 43 is not a mitigation measure. Condition 44 states:
• Condition 44. The Applicant shall prepare a dust control plan conforming to the City Standards and complying with the requirements of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Best Management Practices for dust control prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. The Applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.

Staff Response: This condition is not a mitigation measure because it was not adopted to mitigate specific environmental impacts expected to result from the project. While there were general concerns raised during the public hearing about construction dust, neither the appeal nor the public comments provide any substantial evidence in the record that the project construction will result in significant construction air 9 Packet Pg. 347
Pacifica City Council 20 April 13, 2026
quality impacts. Further, this condition merely reiterates the requirements that dust is controlled during construction in accordance with Bay Area Air District best management practices, which are standard conditions and regulations of general applicability. These standards would be required for any grading activities and reviewed by the Engineering Division prior to grading permit issuance. Therefore, Condition 44 is not a mitigation measure under CEQA.

Condition 45 states:
• Condition 45. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit involving grading, retaining walls, or slope disturbance, the applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement with the City to require the completion of the retaining walls and other related improvements (“Retaining Wall Improvements”) and shall provide security in an amount necessary to complete the Retaining Wall Improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The agreement shall be recorded against the property prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit and shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Staff Response: This condition is not a mitigation measure because it was not adopted to mitigate specific environmental impacts expected to result from the project. This condition relates to a financial mechanism (improvement agreement for a security amount) to ensure that certain improvements which are already proposed as part of the project design are completed if the project is abandoned mid-way. The improvements themselves are project design features, not mitigation measures. Further, Condition 45 is intended to ensure that the project is constructed in compliance with applicable standards. . Accordingly, Condition 45 is not a mitigation measure under CEQA.
b. Class 3 Categorical Exemption. “New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures,” does not apply to the project because it is comprised of a large single-family residence, ADU, three-car garage, retaining walls, elevated driveway, and grading.

Staff Response: The Class 3 exemption applies to the “construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures” (CEQA Guidelines § 15303). Examples of the Class 3 “exemption include, but are not limited to… “[o]ne single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences” and “[a]ccessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools, and fences.” (Ibid.) There are no floor area restrictions for new construction associated with this exemption.

The appellant selectively quotes the first example, omitting the provision allowing up to three singlefamily residences in urbanized areas. An urbanized area is defined, in part, as: (a) an incorporated city that meets either of the following criteria: (1) has a population of at least 100,000 persons; [or] (2) has a population of less than 100,000 persons if the population of that city and not more than two contiguous incorporated cities combined equals at least 100,000 persons (Pub. Resources Code § 21071). Per the 2020 U.S. Census, the population of the City of Pacifica is 38,640, and the populations of its contiguous neighboring cities of Daly City and South San Francisco are 104,901 and 66,105, respectively. The City of Pacifica is an urbanized area because it is an incorporated city contiguous to not more than two incorporated cities that exceed 100,000 people.

Accordingly, the Class 3 exemption would allow the construction of up to three single-family residences because the City of Pacifica is an urbanized area. Here, the Project’s construction of one single-family residence, an ADU, and a garage is a lesser intensity of development than three single-family residences and thus cannot be expected to have greater environmental impacts than three single-family residences.

The Project clearly falls under the Class 3 exemption.

Furthermore, the second referenced example refers to accessory structures, in the plural. Here, the accessory dwelling unit and garage are accessory structures that can be built under the Class 3 exemption. c. Project size, steep topography, flag-lot location, and proximity to neighbors constitute “unusual 9 Packet Pg. 348
Pacifica City Council 21 April 13, 2026
circumstances” under CEQA.

Staff Response: Further, the exception for “unusual circumstances” does not apply. This exception applies where, due to “unusual circumstances,” there is a “reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment” (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2(b)). A claim that this exception applies can be proven in only two ways: (1) by showing both that the project is unusual and that there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant adverse impact on the environment due to the project’s unusual circumstances; or (2) by showing that the project will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
“[U]nusual circumstances are those that (i) differ from the general circumstances of the projects covered by the particular categorical exemption and (ii) create an environmental risk that does not exist for the general class of exempt projects.” “[W]hether a circumstance is ‘unusual’ is judged relative to the typical circumstances related to an otherwise typically exempt project.” Unusual circumstances are generally found on the basis of “some feature of the project that distinguishes it from others in the exempt class,” which can sometimes be on the basis of its size or location.

As discussed above in Staff Response (b), the project proposes a single-family residence, a garage, and an ADU, which is exactly the kind of development contemplated by the CEQA Class 3 exemption, as evidenced by the enumerated examples in CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 language, so it cannot be distinguished from others in the exempt class. The project complies with all applicable objective zoning standards for the Single-Family Residential Hillside (R-1-H) District, and the project is consistent with the scale and intensity anticipated for residential development in the City, such that the height, FAR, ground coverage etc. of the project cannot be considered “unusual.” Hillside conditions, grading, retaining walls, and engineered foundations are common characteristics of development in the R-1-H district and do not constitute unusual circumstances when compared to similar projects on hillside lots in Pacifica. Pursuant to PMC Section 9-4.951, the R-1-H zone regulates development of “certain hillside areas” and “allow[s] residential development compatible with the slope limitations of the development site” and consistent with the Pacifica Design Guidelines.

The applicant provided two geotechnical investigations by different firms, both of which demonstrate that the proposed project will not have significant environmental impacts related to grading, excavation, slope stability, and drainage.

By contrast, the appellant and other public commenters have raised only generalized concerns and unsubstantiated opinions that Project creates geological risks, which do not present substantial evidence that unusual circumstances exist here, nor substantial evidence of any impacts due to unusual circumstances. These concerns raised by the Appellant are “normal and common considerations in the construction of a single-family residence,” and are not evidence of unusual circumstances. Further, the courts have generally rejected such size and location arguments presenting unusual circumstances in the case of single-family homes, as the appellant is raising here for this project. Thus, the appellants fail to provide substantial evidence that the project includes unusual circumstances or that the project will result in significant impacts to remove the project from the scope of the Class 3 CEQA exemption.

In conclusion, mitigation measures have not been included, the project qualifies for a Class 3 Categorical Exemption, and there is no evidence that the Project itself presents unusual circumstances. Thus, the analysis on the application of the unusual circumstances exception would need to end there under the applicable law. The City cannot require an Initial Study if the project is found to be categorically exempt and the exceptions to the exemption do not apply. (See CEQA Guidelines § 15063; see also Pub.

Resources Code § 21080(a), (c)). This appeal point was adequately addressed by the Planning Commission.

Accordingly, there is no merit to Appellants’ claim and does not warrant overturning the Planning Commission’s decision.
9 Packet Pg. 349
Pacifica City Council 22 April 13, 2026
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica does hereby make the finding that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub.

Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) pursuant to the Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) categorical exemption (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14 [“CEQA Guidelines”] § 15303). CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 applies to the Project as described below:

CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 states that Class 3 applies to the “construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures.” Examples of the Class 3 “exemption include, but are not limited to . . . “[o]ne single-family residence, or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone. In urbanized areas, up to three single-family residences” and “[a]ccessory (appurtenant) structures including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools, and fences.” (CEQA Guidelines § 15303.)
The City Council finds that the Project fits within the scope of the Class 3 exemption because it involves the construction of a single-family residence and accessory structures in a residential zoning district (R-1-H). There are no floor area restrictions for new construction associated with this exemption. The City Council finds that the City of Pacifica is an urbanized area, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21071, because the City is an incorporated city contiguous to not more than two incorporated cities that exceed 100,000 people. Accordingly, the Class 3 exemption would allow the construction of up to three single-family residences because the City of Pacifica is an urbanized area. This Project would only involve the construction of one singlefamily residence. Therefore, there is substantial evidence in the record to support a finding that the Project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303.

Additionally, the City Council finds that none of the exceptions to application of a categorical exemption contained in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines apply to the Project, as described below:
• Location (§ 15300.2(a)): There is no evidence in the record that the Project will impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern in an area designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, State, or local agencies. The Project site is located within a substantially developed residential neighborhood and is not located in a sensitive environmental area. Therefore, the “location” exception is not applicable.
• Cumulative Impacts (§ 15300.2(b)): There is no evidence in the record that successive projects of the same type in the area would have a cumulatively significant environmental impact. The Project proposes residential development, in accordance with the General Plan, within a substantially developed residential neighborhood. Staff is aware of no evidence of impending development of other similar projects in the area that would have a significant impact on the environment, either alone or cumulatively with other projects in the vicinity.
• Unusual Circumstances (§ 15300.2(c)): There is no evidence in the record that the Project (1) involves unusual circumstances or (2) may have a significant effect on the environment due to those unusual circumstances. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record that the project will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. The Project does not differ from the general circumstances of the projects covered by the Class 3 categorical exemption and the Project does not create an environmental risk that does not exist for the general class of exempt projects. Because the City is an urbanized area, the Class 3 exemption would allow construction of three single-family residences; the Project consists of one single-family residence and associated accessory structures, 9 Packet Pg. 350
Pacifica City Council 23 April 13, 2026
and is therefore a lesser intensity of development than allowed under the Class 3 exemption. The Project site is zoned and designated for residential use, and the hillside development pattern is consistent with the surrounding development. The project complies with all applicable objective zoning standards for the Single-Family Residential Hillside (R-1-H) District, and the project is consistent with the scale and intensity anticipated for residential development in the City, such that the height, FAR, ground coverage, etc. of the project cannot be considered “unusual.” Hillside conditions, grading, retaining walls, and engineered foundations are common characteristics of development in the R-1-H district and do not constitute unusual circumstances when compared to similar projects on hillside lots in Pacifica. There is no evidence to indicate the site has any value to protected species. The applicant provided two geotechnical reports (Attachment F and Attachment G) of the staff report) by different firms, both of which demonstrate that the Project will not have significant environmental impacts related to grading, excavation, slope stability, or drainage. By contrast, the Appellant and other public commenters have raised just generalized concerns and unsubstantiated lay opinions that Project creates geological risks, which do not present substantial evidence that unusual circumstances exist here, nor substantial evidence of any impacts due to unusual circumstances. As such, there are no identifiable unusual circumstances and no evidence that the Project may have a significant effect on the environment due to those unusual circumstances. There is also no evidence in the record that the project will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, the “unusual circumstances” exception does not apply.
• Scenic Highways, Hazardous Waste Sites, Historical Resources (§ 15300.2(d)-(f)): The Project is not proposed near a designated scenic highway, does not involve a current or former hazardous waste site, and does not affect any historical resources. Therefore, the exceptions in subsections (d) through (f) are not applicable to this Project.

Because substantial evidence in the record shows that the Project is consistent with the requirements of a Class 3 exemption, and none of the exceptions to applying a categorical exemption in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply, the City Council finds that the Project is categorically exempt from CEQA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica hereby finds that none of the negative findings under PMC Section 9-4.3204(a) can be made with respect pertaining to Site Development Permit PSD-838-18, and hereby makes the following findings:

1. That the location, size, and intensity of the proposed operation will create a hazardous or inconvenient vehicular or pedestrian traffic pattern, taking into account the proposed use as compared with the general character and intensity of the neighborhood; The Project would not substantially increase traffic since only one single-family residence and one accessory dwelling unit (ADU) are proposed, and because the Project site is located in an area of established residences. The Project includes three covered parking spaces in a garage attached to the primary residence, which meets the PMC requirement of two parking spaces for a single-family residence and one guest parking space. The Project will provide adequate emergency vehicle access through provision of an on-site emergency vehicle turnaround. The proposed 18’-0” access driveway from Bay View Road does not meet the 20’-0” standard width required for emergency vehicle access pursuant to the California Fire Code (CFC). However, the design has been reviewed and deemed acceptable by the North County Fire Authority (NCFA) given the project site’s limitations, including limited space from Bay View Road for access to the site and lack of any other feasible access route. The 18’-0” width of the access driveway is the widest access point that can be obtained in light of an existing landscaping easement on the applicant’s property. The proposed development will not affect or impede alternative transportation modes. On balance, the location, size, and intensity of the proposed project 9 Packet Pg. 351
Pacifica City Council 24 April 13, 2026
will not create a hazardous or inconvenient vehicular or pedestrian traffic pattern.

1. That the accessibility of off-street parking areas and the relation of parking areas with respect to traffic on adjacent streets will create a hazardous or inconvenient condition to adjacent or surrounding uses;
The Project includes three covered parking spaces in a garage attached to the primary residence. The parking spaces are accessible via the driveway from Bay View Road to the proposed residence. The proposed driveway is designed with approximately 12 feet of separation from the neighboring driveway to the north. The circulation and access aspects of the project, including ingress/egress between Bay View Road and the project site via the proposed driveway have undergone review and approval by the City's Engineering Division staff to ensure safe operations. Additionally, Bay View Road will be maintained and repaired as per the Engineering conditions of approval.

The three-car garage parking spaces meet the PMC requirement of two parking spaces for a single-family residence and one guest parking space, fulfilling the off-street parking requirements for the proposed development. The single-family residence proposed is not expected to significantly increase traffic on Bay View Road, which serves as the access route to the development. Moreover, 11 other single-family residences use Bay View Road for access with similar driveway configurations.

Therefore, the Project will not create any hazardous or inconvenient conditions for adjacent or surrounding uses with respect to the accessibility of off-street parking and the relationship of off-street parking area to traffic.

2. That insufficient landscaped areas have been reserved for the purposes of separating or screening service and storage areas from the street and adjoining building sites, breaking up large expanses of paved areas, and separating or screening parking lots from the street and adjoining building areas from paved areas to provide access from buildings to open areas; The proposed service and storage areas will be entirely contained within the residence and will not be visible from the street or adjacent properties. The proposed landscaping, combined with the remaining undeveloped vegetated area, covers more than 50 percent of the site, exceeding the 20 percent requirement for landscaping per PMC 9-4.402(i). This extensive landscaping plan incorporates a variety of plantings such as shrubs, ground covers, grasses, and trees. Specifically, plantings along the driveway and near retaining walls are strategically placed to break up and soften the visual impact of these hardscape elements. The selection of small and large broadleaf trees aims to screen the proposed development from neighboring residential properties. A detailed landscape plan, including information on the full spread and height of the plantings, will be finalized during the building permit stage to ensure effective screening.

To address concerns from neighbors’ regarding the visual impacts of the driveway design, Condition of Approval 43 was added by the Planning Commission to ensure that the applicant and staff “make a good faith effort to redesign the project driveway to be more aesthetically pleasing”, noting that that final design approval for the driveway is outside the City’s purview.

As such, as conditioned, the project’s landscaping will provide adequate screening and relief from hardscaping and paved surfaces.

1. That the proposed development, as set forth on the plans, will unreasonably restrict or cut out light and air on the property and on other property in the neighborhood, or will hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of land and buildings in the neighborhood, or impair the value thereof;
The project entails the development of an approximately 3,180-square foot (sf) single-family residence, 9 Packet Pg. 352
Pacifica City Council 25 April 13, 2026
along with an approximately 668-sf attached three-car garage, and associated improvements on an approximately 26,055-sf undeveloped lot.

The placement of the buildings on this relatively spacious site allows for setbacks from all property lines that exceed the minimum requirements for the single-family residence. The proposed development is located on significantly higher ground than the nearest residences along Rockaway Beach Avenue to the south. However, the proposed residence will set back a minimum of 15 feet-6 inches at its southeastern corner with its taller, two-story portions setback further behind. The setbacks from common property line of the proposed buildings will ensure that there are no light and air impacts to surrounding properties, including those that are not developed at present. Structures such as retaining walls, driveway, fence and hedges are not subject to setback requirements pursuant to PMC section 9-4.2502. The proposed singlefamily residence is a use consistent with the use in the vicinity and the buildings constructed would be scaled down with architectural features and detailing. This approach ensures that the project does not impede or discourage appropriate development and use of land and buildings in the area, nor diminish their value.

As such, the project is planned in a way that does not unreasonably restrict or obstruct light and air on the property or neighboring properties, nor does it hinder or discourage appropriate development and use of land and buildings in the neighborhood or diminish their value.

2. That the improvement of any commercial or industrial structure, as shown on the elevations as submitted, is substantially detrimental to the character or value of an adjacent R District area; The proposed development is a residential project and no improvements to any commercial or industrial structures are proposed. Therefore, this finding is inapplicable to the subject project.

3. That the proposed development will excessively damage or destroy natural features, including trees, shrubs, creeks, and rocks, and the natural grade of the site, except as provided in the subdivision regulations as set forth in Chapter 1 of Title 10 of this Code; The project site is currently undeveloped and covered with vegetation, including thick brush, bushes, and scattered trees. Four of the trees are either within the project site or within 50 feet of the construction limits. Two of these trees, both Monterey Pines, are protected trees, per PMC Section 4-12.02(n). One of these protected trees is proposed for removal to facilitate the proposed development on the project site, in addition to a dead, 10-inch diameter at breast height (DBH) Monterey Pine tree and another 8-inch DBH tree of the same species. Removal of the two healthy trees will require four new tree plantings of the same species at a replacement ratio of 2:1, per PMC Section 4-12.04(e).

The Project arborist report, titled “Tree Assessment & Protection,” dated March 18, 2023, prepared by Byron Ellis (Attachment F) of the Planning Commission staff report, dated December 1, 2025 <https://pacificacityca.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=1&ID=1618&Inline=True>), recommends a Tree Protection Plan for all trees, including trees on neighboring properties that are six or more DBH in size and located within the proposed project site and fifty (50’) feet of within project’s limits of disturbance, in accordance with PMC. The recommendations in this report have been reviewed and approved by the City Arborist. The Project arborist report will be updated with the description of the plan for watering trees during the construction activities, in accordance with PMC Section 4-12.11(c)(3), prior to issuance of the building permit, as set forth in the conditions of approval of this project.

The other potentially significant natural feature is the natural grade present on the site. The steeply sloping topography of the Project site presents significant challenges to minimizing excavation. The Project proposes extensive retaining walls on the north and the southern side of the Project site with a retaining wall east of the ADU, as part of development on the Project site. However, the overall site and building design follows the slope of the site to the maximum extent feasible. The Project’s site plan, largely driven by the site access requirements for fire safety, locates the Project’s driveway on the 9 Packet Pg. 353
Pacifica City Council 26 April 13, 2026
relatively less steep northern portion of the project site with the building footprint configured to accommodate the shape of the hammerhead required for fire truck access. The proposed buildings are located along the contours with access to the residence on the upper level on higher ground with the lower level below setback into the hillside. These features of the site and building design serve to reduce excavation and, thus minimize adverse impacts to the natural topography.

The submitted geotechnical engineering investigations conclude that the Project is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint, provided that the recommendations contained in the accompanying reports are incorporated into the final plans and implemented during construction. Condition of Approval 30 has been included to ensure recommendations proposed in the geotechnical reports are incorporated within the final Project plans prior to the issuance of the building permit.

As such, as conditioned, the project will not excessively damage or destroy the natural features of the site.

4. That there is insufficient variety in the design of the structure and grounds to avoid monotony in the external appearance;
As earlier indicated, the Spanish revival style of the residence blends several architectural elements such as varied roof profiles, balconies, and curves and arches for window and door openings. These elements along with the complementary colors and materials associated with the Spanish Revival style, such as red terracotta tiles for the roofs, brown wood-framed windows and roof shelves, and white stucco for the exterior walls ensure a visually interesting and harmonious design that avoids monotony.

The facades of the residence display complementary variety, exhibiting similarity in colors and materials while varying the size, shape, and treatment of windows. Large curved and arched windows and door elements on the northern and southern facades, coupled with square windows on the sides, introduce variety to the design.

Overall, the combination of diverse architectural treatments and articulations, along with the variety of plant materials used in landscaping, ensures that the external appearance of the proposed buildings exhibits sufficient variety and avoids any sense of monotony.

5. That the proposed development is inconsistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines; or The proposed project has achieved consistency with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines as follows:
• Site Planning
Screening: Exterior trash and storage areas, service yards, landing docks and ramps, electrical utility boxes, etc., should be screened from view of all nearby streets and adjacent structures in a manner that is compatible with building and site design. Such facilities should be conveniently located, but must not interfere with the circulation and parking on the site.

As earlier mentioned, all service and storage areas would be located within the building interior and screened from view of all nearby streets and adjacent structures, with no visual impact or interference with parking and circulation on the Project site. • Building Design
Scale: An important aspect of design and compatibility is scale. A development can be out of scale with its surroundings due to its relative height, bulk, mass, or density. A structure which is out of scale with its site and neighborhood threatens the integrity of the overall streetscape, and residential projects, particularly single-family dwelling which are much larger than neighboring 9 Packet Pg. 354
Pacifica City Council 27 April 13, 2026
structures are therefore discouraged.

Details. Use architectural features and details to help create a sense of human scale. Wall insets, balconies, window projections, etc., are examples of building elements which may help reduce the scale of larger buildings.

Materials: Compatibility of materials is an essential ingredient in design quality. Consistency and congruity of materials and design elements on individual structures is also important.

Privacy. Consideration should be given to the impact of development on the privacy of surrounding properties. Use judicious window placement and appropriate landscaping to help minimize the potential for loss of privacy.

Consistency: There should be architectural consistency among all building elevations.

The proposed project complies with the objective development standards of the R-1-H zoning district, including height, bulk, mass, and lot coverage, and all of the buildings exceed the minimum setbacks. As mentioned earlier, the proposed residence is articulated in the Spanish Revival architectural style to include curves and arches above window and door openings on both the southern and northern facades.

The southern façade also includes lower and upper-level balconies with wood railings that extend to the western façade. The overall mass of the building is tempered with varied wall planes between the upper and lower levels that are visible from the south and offsets visible from the west and the north. The wall planes on the east are broken by the distance between the primary residence and the ADU that is located to the north of the residence.

The above-mentioned features and the varied roof profiles of both buildings serve to scale down the development consistent with the surrounding residences of smaller footprints and mass. This effect is more notable on the south side that faces the residential development downslope. The proposed materials, including terracotta tiles for the roofs, wood railings and frames for the balconies, and stucco for exterior walls, align with the Spanish Revival style of the buildings and bring seamless consistency among all facades of the buildings.

The proposed site plan allows for relatively deep setbacks from all property lines and trees would be strategically planted in accordance with the final landscape plan to screen the proposed development that would minimize privacy impacts to surrounding residences. Additionally, the proposed design accounts for the neighbors’ expressed concern regarding privacy in not pursuing the alternative that placed the building closer to the project site’s southern boundary and lower on the hillside.

Therefore, on balance, the Project design is consistent with this design guideline. • Hillside Development
Excavation. Large amounts of cut and/or fill are unattractive on hillsides, and can have a detrimental impact on the immediate and surrounding environment. (a) Structures should relate to and follow site topography to work with the slope, not against it. (b) Whenever feasible, buildings and roads should be sited to align with existing contours of the land.
(c) Retaining walls should be avoided or, if necessary, their height should be reduced to the minimum feasible.
(d) Avoid one-level solutions which would result in excessive lot coverage and more disruption of 9 Packet Pg. 355
Pacifica City Council 28 April 13, 2026
the site. Multi-level structures which step down the slope can help to minimize cut and fill.

As previously discussed, the steeply sloping topography of the project site presents significant challenges for minimizing excavation that has required extensive retaining walls on the northern and the southern side of the Project site as well as a retaining wall east of the accessary dwelling unit. However, the overall site and building design follows the northeast to southeast downward slope of the site with a step-down design to the south integrating the buildings with the surrounding terrain. The access driveway and emergency vehicle turnaround have also been designed to relate to and follow site topography to work with the slope, not against it, by placing them at the flatter portions of the upper site. Additionally, the placement of the proposed buildings is such that the longer facades are aligned with the direction of the existing contours. Therefore, on balance, the Project design is consistent with this design guideline.

2. That the proposed development is inconsistent with the General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, or other applicable laws of the City.

The land use designation for the project site is Low Density Residential (LDR) per the 2040 General Plan.

The LDR land use designation allows for the development of three to nine dwelling units per gross acre.

The resulting density of the proposed Project is 3.3 units per acre, based on the proposal for two dwelling units (comprised of a primary dwelling unit and accessory dwelling unit) on a 0.598-acre site. Therefore, the density of the proposed development is consistent with that of the LDR designation. Additionally, the proposed single-family residential use is consistent with the primary intended use in LDR designation of the General Plan.

The Project is also consistent with the development standards of the applicable R-1-H (Single-Family Residential Hillside) zoning district. Specifically, the height, setbacks, lot coverage, off-street parking, and other applicable development standards of the R-1-H zoning district as further detailed in the staff report.

Further, the Project is consistent with applicable General Plan policies that include, but are not limited to, the following:

Community Design Element:

Policy CD-I-11. Minimize Visual Impacts of Hillside Development. Require new development to employ innovative site planning, engineering and design techniques that:
• Seek first to avoid impacts to scenic resources through site planning and design; • Minimize grading and conform with natural landforms to the greatest extent possible; • Design structures so that they follow contours and limit their downslope exposure; and • Use landscaping to screen and integrate buildings with the natural environment.

Policy CD-I-14. Design Review. Continue to use Design Guidelines to evaluate proposed projects in Planned Development, Hillside Development, and Special districts.

Land Use Element
Policy LU-I-5. Density Ranges. Ensure that development is permitted within the allowable density range for the applicable land use designations.

Circulation Element
Policy CI-I-22. Improvements for Existing Facilities. Maintain and upgrade local streets, sidewalks, utilities, and other City infrastructure in a manner that prevents deterioration and corrects existing deficiencies.

Housing Element
9 Packet Pg. 356
Pacifica City Council 29 April 13, 2026
HE-G-1. Maintain, Improve, and Develop Housing: Encourage the development and retention of housing in a variety of types for all income levels with priority given to low-income households and projects that foster sustainable urban development.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pacifica hereby makes the following findings pertaining to Tree Removal Permit TP-4-24:
(a) The condition of the tree, presence of disease, pest infestation, damage, public nuisance, risk, proximity to existing or proposed structures, and/or interference with utility services.

The protected tree to be removed, as identified above, is in close proximity to a retaining wall necessary to allow for the construction of the hammerhead portion of the Project driveway, which is necessary for the required fire truck access to the site. Given the proximity of the subject tree to proposed construction including structures, the removal of this tree is necessary. Removal of this tree is also justified, as it will not survive the impact to its root zone because of the grading and construction associated with the proposed site improvements as described above. (b) Whether the requested action is necessary for the economically viable use of the property.

The subject tree removal is necessary to facilitate the construction of the hammerhead portion of the Project’s driveway that is essential for fire truck access to the development. The Project’s driveway is located in the only feasible location on the project site, given the limitations of slope and site access from public street. In the absence of such access, the Project site cannot be developed, thus depriving the owner of economically viable use of the property.
(c) The topography of the land and effect of the requested action on it.

The Project includes geotechnical evaluation, as incorporated in Attachment F and Attachment G to the staff report, that evaluated slope stability. The geotechnical evaluation concluded that the Project could be constructed safely, subject to the recommendations in the report, including those pertaining to removal of trees.
(d) The number, species, size, and location of existing trees in the area and the effect of the requested action upon shade, noise buffers, protection from wind damage, air pollution, historic value, scenic beauty and upon the health, safety, and general welfare of the area and the City as a whole.

As noted above, removal of the subject protected tree would facilitate the fire access necessary for the development of the Project site, thereby promoting health, safety, and general welfare of the area, and by extension, the City as a whole. The planting of required replacement trees would be located in accordance with the final landscape plan that would be reviewed and approved by City staff, ensuring that such plantings contribute to the scenic beauty associated with trees on the project site. Removal of one protected tree in relation to the large size of the Project site would not result in adverse impacts to shade, noise buffers, protection from wind damage, air pollution, or historic value on the Project site or immediate surroundings.
(e) The number of healthy trees the parcel is able to support.

The Project site is 26,055 square feet in size, which is adequate to ensure that the two replacement trees required for mitigation of the removal of the subject protected tree can be installed and maintained on the project site healthfully.

Based on the foregoing analysis, there is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the criteria for approval of a tree removal permit to remove one protected tree have been met by the Project. 9 Packet Pg. 357
Pacifica City Council 30 April 13, 2026
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based on the aforementioned findings, the City Council of the City of Pacifica approves Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Removal Permit TP-4-24, subject to conditions of approval included as Exhibit A to this resolution, and finds the Project exempt from CEQA.
* * * * *
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pacifica, California, held on the 13th day of April 2026.

AYES, Councilmember:

NOES, Councilmember:

ABSENT, Councilmember:

ABSTAIN, Councilmember:
______________________________
Christine Boles, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ______________________________ Sarah Coffey, City Clerk Michelle Marchetta Kenyon, City Attorney Exhibit A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PSD-838-18 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TP-4-24 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 3,180-SQUARE FOOT (SF) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 668-SF ATTACHED THREE-CAR GARAGE AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 26,055-SF, UNDEVELOPED LOT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET EAST-NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROCKAWAY BEACH AVENUE AND BAY VIEW ROAD (APN 022-062-550) 9 Packet Pg. 358
Pacifica City Council 31 April 13, 2026
City Council Meeting of April 13, 2026
Planning Division of the Community Development Department

1. Development shall be substantially in accordance with the plans set entitled “Benda-Spenker Residence,” prepared December 3, 2018, last revised October 21, 2024, except as modified by the following conditions.

2. Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 is valid for a period of two years from the date of final determination. If the use or uses approved is/are not established within such period of time, the approval shall expire unless Applicant submits a written request for an extension and applicable fee prior to the expiration date, and the Community Development Director or Planning Commission approves the extension request as provided below. The Community Development Director may administratively grant a single, one-year extension provided, in the their sole discretion, if the circumstances considered during the initial project approval have not materially changed. Otherwise, the Planning Commission shall consider a request for a single, one-year extension.

3. The approval letter issued by the City and all conditions of approval attached thereto shall be included as plan sheets within all plan sets submitted to the City as part of any building permit application.

4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall clearly indicate compliance with all applicable conditions of approval on the plans and/or provide written explanations to the Community Development Director’s satisfaction.

5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit plans that include an update to the project data table on the Cover Page, accurately depicting the applicable R-1-H (Single-Family Residential Hillside) development standards and correcting the error in the proposed lot coverage (lot area covered by the proposed structures) mentioned.

6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit a detailed on-site exterior lighting plan for review and approval by the Community Development Director. Said plan shall indicate fixture design, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Lighting shall be directed away from adjacent residences.

Buffering techniques to reduce light and glare impacts to residences shall be required. Building lighting shall be architecturally integrated with the building style, materials and colors and shall be designed to minimize glare. Show fixture locations, where applicable, on all building elevations.

7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit a final landscape plan for approval by the Community Development Director. The landscape plan shall show each type, size at maturity, and location of plant materials, including the location of the four replacement Monterey Pine trees (or other acceptable species as approved by the City Arborist) in lieu of the two Monterey Pine trees removed (2:1 replacement ratio) for Project construction, as well as the irrigation system. The four replacement trees shall be planted south of the proposed residence and serve to screen the development from downhill residential properties along Rockaway Beach Avenue. Landscaping materials included on the plan shall be coastal compatible, drought tolerant and shall be predominantly native. All landscaping shall be completed consistent with the final landscape plans prior to occupancy. In addition, the landscaping shall be maintained as shown on the landscape plan and shall be designed to incorporate efficient irrigation to reduce runoff, promote surface filtration, and minimize the use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides.

Landscaping on the site shall be adequately maintained in a healthful condition and replaced, when necessary, as determined by the Community Development Director. 9 Packet Pg. 359
Pacifica City Council 32 April 13, 2026

8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit a completed Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) checklist demonstrating compliance with the MWELO water efficiency standards for review and approval by the Community Development Director.

9. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit an updated Project arborist report for review and approval by the City Arborist that, in addition to the tree protection plan included in the Project arborist report titled “Tree Assessment & Protection,” dated March 18, 2023, prepared by Byron Ellis, includes the following:
a. A description of the plan for watering trees during the construction activities; b. Plan for tree replacement at 2:1 ratio for the proposed tree removal, as described in Condition of Approval No. 7; and
c. Correct the error in the identification as a protected tree of Tree #12, labeled as Red Ironbark Eucalyptus tree in the Project arborist report titled “Tree Assessment & Protection,” dated March 18, 2023, prepared by Byron Ellis. a. Potential impact of the access roadway and other improvements on Tree #1 to be analyzed by a qualified Arborist. The amended report shall include specific protection measures, or, if preservation is not possible, recommend appropriate replacement species to be planted at a 2:1 ratio.

10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit , all transformers, HVAC units, backflow preventers and other ground-mounted utility equipment shall be shown on the landscape and irrigation plans and shall be located out of public view and/or adequately screened through the use or combination of walls or fencing, berming, painting, and/or landscaping, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

11. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit a roof plan with spot elevations showing the location of all roof equipment including vents, stacks and skylights. All roof equipment shall be screened to the Community Development Director’s satisfaction.

12. All permanent mechanical equipment, such as motors, compressors, pumps, and compactors, which is determined by the Building Official to be a source of structural vibration or structureborne noise, shall be shock mounted in inertia blocks or bases and/or vibration isolators in a manner approved by the Building Official.

13. During construction, Applicant shall maintain its site in a fashion that does not constitute a public nuisance and that does not violate any provision of the Pacifica Municipal Code.

14. All outstanding and applicable fees associated with the processing of this Project shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.

15. The Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its City Council, Planning Commission, advisory boards, officers, employees, consultants and agents (hereinafter “City”) from any claim, action or proceeding (hereinafter “Proceeding”) brought against the City to attack, set aside, void or annul the City‘s actions regarding any development or land use permit, application, license, denial, approval or authorization, including, but not limited to, variances, use permits, developments plans, specific plans, general plan amendments, zoning amendments, approvals and certifications pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and/or any mitigation monitoring program, or brought against the City due to actions or omissions in any way connected to the Applicant’s Project (“Challenge”). City may, but is not obligated to, defend such Challenge as City, in its sole discretion, determines appropriate, all at Applicant’s sole cost and expense. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and costs of suit, attorney’s fees and other costs, liabilities and 9 Packet Pg. 360
Pacifica City Council 33 April 13, 2026
expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, City, and/or parties initiating or bringing such Proceeding. If the Applicant is required to defend the City as set forth above, the City shall retain the right to select the counsel who shall defend the City. Per Government Code Section 66474.9, the City shall promptly notify Applicant of any Proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense.

Building Division of the Community Development Department

16. The Project requires review and approval of a building permit by the Building Official. Applicant shall apply for and receive approval of a building permit prior to commencing any construction activity.

17. The Project shall comply with all recommendations from the geotechnical engineering investigations:
a. The applicant shall retain a California-licensed Geotechnical Engineer to provide all required geotechnical review, observation, and testing during grading, excavation, and foundation construction. A letter from the Geotechnical Engineer confirming review and approval of the project plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of any grading or building permit.
b. The contractor shall provide the Geotechnical Engineer and the City a minimum of 72 hours’ notice prior to any earthwork, subdrain installation, retaining walls, or drilled pier operations.
c. Prior to occupancy of the building, the applicant shall submit certification by the Geotechnical Engineer of record confirming that all work has been completed in substantial conformance with the soils investigation/geotechnical report.

Engineering Division of the Public Works Department

18. Construction shall be in conformance with the City of Pacifica Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance and the San Mateo Countywide Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be implemented during construction, and the construction BMPs plans sheet from the Countywide program shall be included in the Project plans prior to issuance of a building permit.

19. The following requirements must be clearly noted on the construction plans for the Project:
a. Bay View Road shall be maintained clear of construction materials, equipment, storage, debris, and soil. Dust control and daily road cleanup will be strictly enforced. A properly signed no-parking zone may be established during normal working hours only. b. All recorded survey points, monuments, railroad spikes, pins, cross cuts on top of sidewalks and tags on top of culvert headwalls or end walls whether within private property or public right-of-way shall be protected and preserved. If survey point/s are altered, removed or destroyed, the applicant shall be responsible for obtaining the services of a licensed surveyor or qualified Civil Engineer to restore or replace the survey points and record the required map prior to occupancy of the first unit. c. Existing public improvements within the property frontage that are damaged or displaced shall be repaired or replaced as determined by the City Engineer even if damage or displacement occurred prior to any work performed for this project. Any damage to improvements within city right-of-way or to any private property, whether adjacent to subject property or not, that is determined by the City Engineer to have resulted from construction activities related to this project, shall be repaired or replaced as directed by the City Engineer.

20. Excess site drainage must be conducted under the sidewalk to the street. Storm drainage should be designed for a 100-year event. The storm drainage system must be in compliance with Section C.3 of the Municipal Regional Permit for San Mateo County, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

21. Prior to certificate of occupancy or final inspection, existing curb, sidewalk or other street improvements adjacent to the property frontage that is damaged or displaced shall be repaired or replaced as deemed by the City Engineer, even if damage or displacement occurred prior to any 9 Packet Pg. 361
Pacifica City Council 34 April 13, 2026
work performed for this Project.

22. New driveway approach ramp and new concrete sidewalk, curb and gutter shall be per City Standards. Where the sidewalk crosses the driveway approach it must be ADA-compliant, providing no more than 2% cross-slope for no less than 48" width.

23. Applicant shall grind the existing asphalt street pavement with a minimum of 2 inches to street centerline or to the extent of the longest utility trench if beyond the centerline along Bay View Road, and an overlay of Caltrans specification ½" Type 'A' hot mix asphalt concrete shall be placed. If, in the opinion of the City Engineer, damage to the pavement during construction is more extensive, a larger area may have to be ground & overlaid. All pavement markings and markers shall be replaced in kind.

24. All utilities shall be installed underground from the nearest joint pole or box.

25. New waterline for fire sprinkler system shall be per City Standards 300 and 301.

26. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit to Engineering Division the construction plans and necessary reports and engineering calculations for all on-site improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Such plans and reports shall include but are not limited to:
a. An accurate survey plan, showing:
i. survey marks and identifying the reference marks or monuments used to establish the property lines;
ii. property lines labeled with bearings and distances; iii. edge of public right-of-way; and
iv. any easements
b. A site plan, showing:
i. the whole width of right-of-way of adjacent streets, including existing and proposed improvements such as, but not limited to, pavement overlay, undersidewalk drainage, driveway approaches, sidewalk, curb & gutter, ADAcompliant curb ramps, existing underground utilities and trenches for proposed connections, boxes for underground utility connections and meters, existing power poles and any ground-mounted equipment, any existing or proposed street markings and signage; existing and requested traffic control devices, existing and proposed street lights; existing and proposed street monuments ii. the slopes of existing adjacent and any proposed streets; iii. plan, profile and cross sections of the proposed driveways; proposed driveway shall not exceed the maximum grade of 18%;
iv. measurements to adjacent driveways within 25' of the project limits; v. any existing fences, and any structures on adjacent properties within 10' of the property lines;
vi. any existing trees that might be affected by the project; vii. any creeks or seasonal drainage swales or ditches on the property or near enough to be affected by the project
c. Details for construction within the public right-of-way or public easements such as, but not limited to:
i. structural sections for pavements, sidewalks, driveways; ii. water, storm drainage and sanitary sewer pipes and structures; iii. gas, electric and communications facilities;
iv. retaining walls, fences, planters, steps or stairways, or any other fixed structures;
v. All plans and reports must be signed and stamped by a California licensed professional.

27. Prior to the site being physically disturbed in any way that could affect storm water runoff, Applicant shall obtain approval of an erosion control plan by the Building Official.

28. Applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit prior to any work undertaken in the public rightof-way. All work shall be done in accordance with City Standards, Caltrans Standard Specifications, Pacifica Municipal Code, Administrative Policies, and to the satisfaction of the 9 Packet Pg. 362
Pacifica City Council 35 April 13, 2026
City Engineer or his designee, and shall be completed prior issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Permit fees shall be determined per the current adopted fee schedule at the time of permit issuance.

29. Applicant shall provide an Operations and Maintenance Plan and Maintenance Agreement for the Stormwater Treatment Measures, which shall specify that measures shall be inspected at an interval to be determined by the City Engineer. The draft agreement shall be recorded against the property prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. The agreement shall include provisions that allow the City to perform maintenance if not performed by the owner, with such costs to be lien on the property if not promptly reimbursed by owner.

30. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall provide documentation that the geotechnical engineer has confirmed that the bio-swales will not create stability issues with the grade slopes, to the satisfaction of the Building Official and City Engineer.

31. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall revise to conform Drainage Area Codes (A, B, C, D) to Worksheet D of C.3 checklist (1,2,3), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Coordinate area of Drainage Area B with area in Worksheet D.

32. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall revise the drainage plan to identify Self Treating Areas on the plan and on the table.

33. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall provide a detail for the catch basin with sump pump downslope of the house for review and approval by the City Engineer.

34. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall show how stormwater flows into each of the Bio Swales from pipes and driveway surface, as applicable, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

35. Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan (TCP), which shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the start of construction. The TCP shall include the following and any other information as deemed necessary by the City Engineer upon review of the TCP:
a. Identification of the path of travel for delivery trucks to and from the project site. This travel-path shall be shown starting from and returning to the City’s designated truck route or the City limits and starting from and returning to the offload location at the project site.
b. Identification of a “turn-around” area for delivery trucks on site. All open-bed trucks shall be tarped.
c. Identification of all on- and off-site worker parking locations, including any carpool pickup and drop-off locations. d. Identification of an access lane of not less than 11 feet in width between parked vehicles and equipment at all times for emergency vehicle access. e. Staging and storing of equipment and materials in the public right-of-way shall be prohibited unless authorized with an encroachment permit. f. Lane closures shall only be permitted with prior approval from the Department of Public Works and requested from the Department not less than 72 hours in advance of schedule and coordinated with Pacifica Police and Fire Department and Recology. The contractor shall provide the affected properties with written notice not less than 10 days in advance of any road closure. Through traffic shall be maintained at all times along Olympian Way.
g. The TCP shall include a note indicative of these requirements.

North County Fire Authority

36. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall complete fee payment of an Alternate Materials and Methods Request (AMMR) application to North County Fire Authority (NCFA).

37. Fire sprinkler system is required. Applicant shall submit plans to NCFA under separate fire permit.

38. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall provide fire flow information per the California Fire Code, Appendix B, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal.

39. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall install illuminated address identification, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. 9 Packet Pg. 363
Pacifica City Council 36 April 13, 2026

40. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Applicant shall install utility identification, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal.

Planning Commission Conditions of Approval Added at the December 1, 2025, Hearing And as Modified by the City Council at the February 9 and 23, 2026 Hearings

41. Prior to the issuance of building or grading permits, hydraulic calculations along with a letter from the engineer of record indicating that the proposed storm drain system does not increase runoff above the pre-development condition shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The on-site drainage system shall be designed to detain on-site all flows in excess of the existing flows during a 100-year frequency storm. The detention systems shall be designed to detain water only during peak flows.

42. Prior to issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a pre-construction video survey documenting all existing site conditions and all public improvements limits of Bayview Road and Rockaway Beach Avenue, including but not limited to pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, drainage structures, utility boxes, adjacent landscaping, and any other visible surface features. The video survey shall be submitted electronically to the City Engineer for review and acceptance prior to permit issuance. Any damage to Bayview Road and Rockaway Beach Avenue caused by the project shall be repaired by applicant at the applicant’s expense.

43. Applicant, Planning staff, Engineering staff, and NCFA staff shall make a good faith effort to redesign the project driveway to be more aesthetically pleasing, including but not limited to installing a planting strip on the southside driveway if approved by NCFA.

44. Prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a dust control plan conforming to the City Standards and complying with the requirements of the Bay Area Air District’s (formerly Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)) Best Management Practices for dust control for review by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact regarding dust complaints. The person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours.

45. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit involving grading, retaining walls, or slope disturbance, the applicant shall enter into an improvement agreement with the City to require the completion of the retaining walls, drainage, and other related improvements (“Retaining Wall Improvements”) and shall provide security in an amount necessary to complete the Retaining Wall Improvements, as determined by the City Engineer. The agreement shall be recorded against the property prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit and shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney.

City Council Conditions of Approval Added at the February 9, 2026, Hearing and Amended at the February 23, 2026, Hearing

46. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Applicant shall field-verify the location and functionality of the existing storm drain system indicated on civil plans. If the existing storm drain cannot be located or confirmed as functional, the applicant shall design and install a new storm drain line connecting to the public storm drain system on Rockaway Beach Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

47. Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits, the Applicant shall provide a revised rendering of the refined driveway design that includes the windows on 125 Bayview Road to the property owners and residents along Bayview Road on both sides of the street and provide a receipt or some other evidence of certified mailing to property owners and residents along Bayview Road to the Planning Division as evidence of mailing made pursuant to this condition.

48. No grubbing or tree removal shall take place prior to: (1) issuance of a grading permit, (2) issuance of a building permit or (3) recordation of the improvement agreement required per Condition of Approval No. 45.
9 Packet Pg. 364
Pacifica City Council 37 April 13, 2026
*** END OF CONDITIONS ***
9 Packet Pg. 365

CALCULATIONS

ITEM DESCRIPTIONS CRITERIA CALCULATIONS OBSERVATIONS
8 LOT AREA - 26,055.41 SQ.FT
9 AVERAGE SLOPE
S=0.00229 X INTERVAL X LENGTH OF

CONTOURS / LOT AREA
S=0.00229 X 2 X 5,393.38 FT / 0.5017 = 49.23% PER PMC 9-4.2256 10 MAX FLOOR AREA 2800+12(SQRT(LOT AREA -5000)) 2800 +12 (SQRT(26,055.41-5000)) = 4,541.26 SQ.FT PER PMC 9-4.3201

PROPOSED VS ALLOWED

ITEM DESCRIPTIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS ALLOWED OBSERVATIONS 11 MAX HEIGHT 35'-0" 35'-0"
12 MAX FLOOR AREA (MAIN
HOUSE + ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNIT
3860.270 SQ. FT. 4,541.26 SQ.FT
13 GARAGE AREA 668.82 SQ.FT. - 14 LOT COVERAGE 10,900.18 SQ.FT. (41.84%) - 15 LANDSCAPE 3,907.23 SQ.FT. (14.99%) - 16 UNDISTURBED AREA 11,247.99 SQ.FT. (43.17%) -

BUILDING CONDITIONS (MAIN HOUSE)

ITEM DESCRIPTIONS PROPOSED CONDITIONS OBSERVATIONS
1 MAIN FLOOR AREA 1608.380
2 LOWER FLOOR AREA 1572.13
3 TOTAL LIVING AREA 3180.51
4 GARAGE AREA 668.82 SQ. FT.
5 FOOTPRINT 3,849.330

BUILDING CONDITIONS (GUEST HOUSE)
6 ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT
679.76 SQ. FT.
7 FOOTPRINT 679.76 SQ. FT.
· PROJECT INFORMATION
A-0
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS: BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
BAY VIEW RD. CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550

BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE

PROJECT INFORMATION

INDEX OF DRAWING

APPLICABLE CODES

AERIAL VIEW VICINITY MAP
OWNER'S ADDRESS:

OWNER:

OWNER
SITE
OCCUPANCY GROUP:

ZONNING:

BUILDING TYPE:

LOT AREA:
1160 MISSION ST UNIT 810

SAN FRANCISCO ,CA

ROBERTA BENDA AND JOHN

SPENKER
R-1-H
R3/U
VB
26,055.41 Sq.Ft. (0.60 AC)
· 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE
· 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
· 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
· 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
· 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
· 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY STANDARDS
· 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE
· 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
· ALL OTHER LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS

APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT

SCOPE OF WORK
· CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY

HOME AND AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT

BUILDING

GENEREAL PLAN DESIGNATION
PORTION OF THE LOT IS VERY LOW DENSITY ALLOWING 1/2 TO 5 ACRES PER UNIT PORTION OF THE LOT IS LOW DENSITY ALLOWING 3 TO 9 UNITS PER ACR (1.5 TO 4.5 FOR THIS SITE)
A-0 PROJECT INFORMATION
A-1 NOT USED
A-2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
A-2.1 BOUNDARY SURVEY
A-3 SITE PLAN
A-4 ACCESS ROAD & FIRE TRUCK PLAN
A-4.1 GRADING PLAN
A-4.2 SECTIONS
A-4.3 PROFILE AND DETAILS
A-5 LANDSCAPE PLAN
A-5.1 DRAINAGE PLAN
A-5.2 DRAINAGE DETAILS
A-5.3 UTILITY PLAN
A-5.4 SITE AREA USE
A-5.5 FIRE HOSE PLAN
A-5.6 EROSION CONTROL
A-5.7 CONSTRUCTION BEST
MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs)
A-5.8 BIOSWALE CALCULATIONS
A-6 PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
A-6.1 AREA CALCULATION

WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULE
A-7 ELEVATIONS
A-8 ELEVATIONS
A-8.1 ELEVATIONS
A-8.2 ELEVATIONS ENLARGED VIEW
A-8.3 ELEVATIONS ENLARGED VIEW
A-9 SECTION A
A-10 SECTION B
A-11 SECTION C
A-12 SECTION D
A-13 GUEST HOUSE FLOOR PLAN

GUEST HOUSE ELEVATIONS

GUEST HOUSE AREA CALCULATION
A-13.1GUEST HOUSE SECTION E AND F
A-14 RENDER VIEWS

9.a
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 14 15
66 67
68 69
70 6
72 71
C
B
A
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
13 SANTA CRUZ

ROCKAWAY BEACH

BAY VIEW
CALERA TERRACE(40')
(FMLY. HEWITT AVE.)
CALERA TERRACE(40')
TERRACE(40')
ROAD(40')
(E)ACCESS EASEMENT(12')

TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
(E)Wooden Ret. Wall
(E)Wooden Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
CONTOURS @ 2'(Original)
CONTOURS @ 10'
(E)RETAINING WALL
(E)POST POLE LIGHT

SITE/GRADING PLAN LEGEND

DESCRIPTION

PROPERTY LINE

CENTER LINE

SYMBOLS
(ALL SYMBOLS NOT NECESSARILY ON DRAWINGS)
(E)TRAFFIC SIGN
(E)POWER POLE
(E)CITY MONUMENT
(E)HYDRANT

EXISTING TREE

EXISTING WOODEN FENCE

EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
(E)OVERHEAD POWER LINE
000
(E)ANCHOR
LEGAL OWNER: Robert Benda & John H. Spenker
LOT ADDRESS: Bay View Rd. - Calera Terrace
Pacifica, CA 94044
LOTS: 6, 13, 14, 15,
TOTAL AREA: 26,055.41 Sq. Ft.

0.60 Ac.

APN: 022 - 062 - 550

THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY ALL DIMENSIONS AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FROM RECORDS NOTE:

GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100
( In Feet )
50 40 30 20 15 10 5 0 25 50
1" = 16'-0"
AND SUPERFICIAL EVIDENCE.
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE

LOT INFORMATION
(Existing Conditions)
(E)WV
(E)WV
(E)CB
(E)FH
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)SDI
RIM=906.16
INV=904.50
(E)SDI
RIM=905.57
INV=904.41
(E)SDI
(E)WV
(E)PP
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50
(E)WM
(E)PPL
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM

ABBREVIATIONS
(E)WM

EXISTING (E)

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH

STORM DRAIN INLET SDI

WATER VALVE WV

WATER METER WM

CATCH BASIN CB

FIRE HYDRANT FH

POWER POLE PP

POWER POLE LIGHT PPL

TRAFFIC SIGN TS
ORIGINAL LOT NUMBER 00
(E)TELEPHONE LINE
(E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
(E) Ø=6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
#171
#125
(E)Wooden Fence (E)SDI
RIM=906.35
INV=904.60

IN THE CITY OF PACIFICA,

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1" = 16'-0"
AVENUE(40')
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(13'WIDE)
(E)PLANTING
EASEMENT Per
Doc#61643AH
Vol.6653, Page 82
PER Doc#61640AH
PER Doc#61640AH
Vol. 6653, Page 78

ROBERT BENDA AND

JOHN SPENKER
DOC. 2018-029095
APN 022-062-550
(E)Wooden Fence
(E)Wooden Fence

CALCULATED (C)

FOUND CROSS CUT ON TOP OF

CONCRETE CURB
BAY VIEW ROAD(40')
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
(E) WATER
LINE
(E) SEWER LINE S S S S S S
(E) WATER LINE W W W W W
(E) GAS LINE G G G

PROPOSED

DRIVEWAY CUT
(E) DRIVEWAY
(E) DRIVEWAY
APN: 022-062-540
APN: 022-062-580
(E) CONC. WALKWAY
12"
TREE
10"
TREE
5 BUSH
3 BUSH
6"
TREE
6"
TREE
6"
TREE
10"
TREE
8"
TREE
12"
TREE
6"
TREE
10"
TREE
18"
TREE
8"
TREE
20"
TREE
18"
TREE
6"
TREE
8"
TREE

90.44' FROM

DRIVEWAY

TO HYRANT
(E)HOUSE
16 (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
A-2
· TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS: BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 73 54
71 72
12 70 69 68
3 67 66 65 64 63 62 61
60 59 58 57
56 55
11 10
9 8
46 7
1 2
5 4
6 14 15 16
17 18 19
53 52
51 50
49 48
47 45
44 20
22 30
21 32
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 31
33 WOODEN RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL

CALERA TERRACE
CALERA TERRACE KEY-STONE RET. WALL

PORTION
OF
6 MAPS 53
BLOCK 21

SANTA CRUZ TERRACE

BAY VIEW ROAD
26 PORTION
OF
6 MAPS 53
BLOCK 18
27 28
25 24
23 22
28 27
26 25
24 23
22 21

PORTION
OF
6 MAPS 53
BLOCK 17

ROBERT BENDA AND
JOHN H. SPENKER
DOC. 2018-029095
APN 022-062-550

ROCKAWAY BEACH AVENUE
(FMLY. HEWITT AVE.)
1" = 30'-0"

PARCEL A

PARCEL B

PARCEL C
13 GENERAL NOTES
LEGEND BASIS OF BEARINGS:

A-2.1
· BOUNDARY SURVEY
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS: BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 14 15
18 19
20 63
64 65
66 67 68
69 72 70
71 C
B
A
1 2
3 4
5 7
8 13

SANTA CRUZ

BAY VIE
CALERA TERRACE(40')
9 8
7 CALERA TERRACE(40')
TERRACE(40')
ROAD(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
1" = 16'-0"
(E)Chain Link Fence

18.00' DRIVEWAY
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)WV
(E)WV
(E)CB
(E)FH
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
dewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)TS
RIM=905.57
INV=904.41
M=905.81
V=896.56
(E)PP
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM
(E)WM
(E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
(E) Ø=6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
#171
#125
(E)Wooden Fence
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
(E)PLANTING
EASEMENT Per
Doc#61643AH
Vol.6653, Page 82
(E)Wooden Fence
FOUND 1" IP WITH TAG
STAMPED L.S. 3451' FROM

RECORD POSITION
(E)Wooden Fence
BAY VIEW ROAD(40')
(N) DRIVEWAY (18' WIDE)
25'-1"

SETBACK
38'-8"

SETBACK
20'-3"

SETBACK
40'-7"

SETBACK
34'-3"

SETBACK
74'-5"

SETBACK
29'-11"

SETBACK
33'-11"

SETBACK
15'-6"

SETBACK
26'-4"

SETBACK

SETBACK
50'
34'-8"

SETBACK
BAY VIEW ROAD (40')

7.00'

4.75 5.72
(E) DRIVEWAY
(E) DRIVEWAY
20'-0" SETBACK ENVELOP

SETBACK ENVELOP
20'-0"
10'-0" SETBACK

ENVELOP
20'-0" SETBACK ENVELOP
20'-0" SETBACK ENVELOP
10'-0" SETBACK

ENVELOP

SETBACK ENVELOP
20'-0"
(E) CONC. WALKWAY (E) KEYSTONE RET.WALL

14.53'

8.58'
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES R52'
R28'
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
12" TREE
10" TREE
BUSH
5 3 BUSH
CANOPY 18'
CANOPY
16'
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8" CANOPY
10'TREE
12" TREE
CANOPY
20'
6" TREE
CANOPY
8'
10" TREE
CANOPY
8'
18" TREE
25' CANOPY
8" TREE
CANOPY
16'
20" TREE
30' CANOPY
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE 6"
8" TREE CANOPY
9'
CANOPY 8'
(E) TREE TO BE REMOVED
(E) TREE TO BE REMOVED
(E) TREE TO BE REMOVED
(E) TREE TO

BE REMOVED
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
16 KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
17 (E) WINDOW & DOOR

LOCATION
(E) WINDOW

LOCATION
(E) WINDOW

LOCATION
(E) WINDOW

LOCATION
(E) WINDOW LOCATION
CONTOURS @ 2'(Original)
CONTOURS @ 10'
(E)RETAINING WALL
(E)POST POLE LIGHT

SITE/GRADING PLAN LEGEND

DESCRIPTION

PROPERTY LINE

CENTER LINE

SYMBOLS
(ALL SYMBOLS NOT NECESSARILY ON DRAWINGS)
(E)TRAFFIC SIGN
(E)POWER POLE
(E)CITY MONUMENT
(E)HYDRANT

EXISTING TREE

EXISTING WOODEN FENCE

EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
(E)OVERHEAD POWER LINE
000
(E)ANCHOR
LEGAL OWNER: Robert Benda & John H. Spenker
LOT ADDRESS: Bay View Rd. - Calera Terrace
Pacifica, CA 94044
LOTS: 6, 13, 14, 15,
TOTAL AREA: 26,055.41 Sq. Ft.

0.60 Ac.

APN: 022 - 062 - 550

LOT INFORMATION

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING (E)

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH

STORM DRAIN INLET SDI

WATER VALVE WV

WATER METER WM

CATCH BASIN CB

FIRE HYDRANT FH

POWER POLE PP

POWER POLE LIGHT PPL

TRAFFIC SIGN TS
ORIGINAL LOT NUMBER 00
(E)TELEPHONE LINE

CALCULATED (C)

FOUND CROSS CUT ON TOP OF

CONCRETE CURB

EASEMENT IS SHOWN ON TOPOGRAPHIC

SURVEY AND BOUNDARY SURVEY

NO CHANGE TO EXISTING TRAFFIC

SIGNS OR PAVING MARKERS

TREE TO BE REMOVED
project no sheet no.

Drawn by:

Checked by: JC
225 ROCKAWAY BEACH AVE. No 400
FAX (650) 355 8965
(650) 355 0615

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
PACIFICA, CA 94044
REMARKS:

ENGINEERING
J C
290614 A-3

SITE PLAN
NORTH
SCALE: 1"= 16'-0"
· SITE PLAN BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26
JAVIER M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER

C I V I L STATE OF CAL I FORNIA
Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 5 78
(E)Chain Link Fence (E)HOUSE (E) Curb
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence (E)HOUSE (E)WM (E)PPL (E)PGE Box (E)WM (E)WM (E)TS (E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe
S. Sewer System Vol.6653, Page 82

4.75 5.72
(N) DRIVEWAY
(18' WIDE)
BAY VIEW ROAD (40')(N) WATER METER (N) 18'-0" CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES 120.00'

70.00' (E) DRIVEWAY (E) DRIVEWAY #171 #125 APN: 022-062-540 APN: 022-062-580 (E) CONC. WALKWAY SPRINKLER (E) KEYSTONE RET.WALL R28'
R52' (N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE 12" TREE
5 BUSH 3 BUSH 18' CANOPY 6" TREE6" TREE 6" TREE 8' CANOPY 12' CANOPY 12' CANOPY 8" TREE 10' CANOPY 12" TREE 20' CANOPY 6" TREE
8' CANOPY 10" TREE 16' CANOPY
10" TREE
8' CANOPY
18" TREE
25' CANOPY
8" TREE
16' CANOPY (E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)SPRINKLER
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
16 KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL ACCESS ROAD (MAIN PROFILE) 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 2.00% 7.77%

10.16%

12.00%

15.00%

15.00%

12.00% (E) STREET 12.54' (E) SW 4.43' NEW ACCESS ROAD 133.58' ON EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING GROUND STATION 2+10.49 ELEV: 989.85 TURN AROUND (SECONDARY ACCESS) FINISH GROUND NEW RETAINING WALL DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARD FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND 120.00' SCALE= 1:10

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE TURN AROUND (SECONDARY PROFILE STA: 2+10.49) 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 70.00' FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND EXISTING GROUNDFINISH GROUND STATION 0+18.31 ELEV: 989.85 TW:1000.60 BW:990.35 TW:989.67 BW:974.00 -2% FILL AREA 1000 TW:1007.9 BW:1000.0 -2% SCALE= 1:10 A-4 J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS: Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525

BENDA-SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET · ACCESS ROAD & FIRE TRUCK PLAN ACCESS ROAD & FIRE TRUCK PLAN SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" NORTH

9.a
Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) LEGAL OWNER: Robert Benda & John H. Spenker LOT ADDRESS: Bay View Rd. - Calera Terrace Pacifica, CA 94044 LOTS: 6, 13, 14, 15 TOTAL AREA: 26,055.41 Sq. Ft. 0.60 Ac. APN: 022 - 062 - 550 LOT INFORMATION 4"Ø P.P. TW=1003.0 BW=995.30 TW=1000.0 BW=992.0 TW=1000.0 BW=990.0 TW=997.2 BW=984.0 TW=991.5 BW=981.5 12"x12" CATCH BASIN RIM=980.5 INV=977.0 TW=1003.0 BW=996.60 TW=996.7 BW=989.0 4"Ø P.P TW=989 BW=982 TW=978.6 BW=976.0 TW=989 BW=970 TW=987 BW=973 TW=991.5 BW=989.0 TW=994.0 BW=989.0 TW=996 BW=989 TW=994 BW=989 TW=992 BW=989 TW=990 BW=989 TRENCH DRAIN RIM=987.7 INV=986.7 4" S.P.
4"Ø PERF. PIPE
4"Ø P.P.
4" P.P. TW=998.0 BW=986.0 TW=988 BW=970 TRENCH DRAIN RIM=986.40 INV=985.40 2+10.49 1+50.55 TRENCH DRAIN RIM=988.68 INV=987.68 LOWER FLOOR FOOTPRINT LOWER FLOOR FOOTPRINT TW=982.25 BW=972.00 5'x33' DISSIPATION AREA, SEE DETAIL "D" SHEET A-5.2 TW=1005.25 BW=997.24 TW=982.6 BW=976.0 MAIN FLOOR FOOTPRINT TW=985 BW=976 4" S.P. TW=982 BW=980
4"Ø P.P.
4"Ø P.P.
4" SOLID PIPE
4" SOLID PIPE NEW DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARD SEE DETAIL SHEET A4.2 EXISTING KEYSTONE RET.WALL TO BE REMOVED 1003
1000 TW=996.0 BW=988.0 TW=1007.7 BW=1000.0 TW=1014.3 BW=1003.0 TW=1013.0 BW=1003.0 TW=1011.6 BW=1000.0 TW=1004.6 BW=996.00 4"Ø P.P
4"Ø P.P
4"Ø P.P TW=987.30 BW=979.00 TW=980.72 BW=978.00
4"Ø P.P
4"S.P.
4"Ø P.P
4"Ø P.P
4"Ø P.P
996
4" P.P. TW=980.6 BW=972.0 BIO SWALE "B" (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A-5.2) BIO SWALE "A" (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A-5.2) TW=984 BW=979 TW=977.0 BW=972.0 4"Ø P.P. TW=989 BW=988 18 19 67 68 69
A
4 5
7 8
CALERA TERRACE(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
nce
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE (E)WM (E)PPL (E)PGE Box (E)WM (E)TS
den Fence (E)PLANTING EASEMENT Per Doc#61643AH Vol.6653, Page 82 (E)Wooden Fence
(E)Wooden Fence

4.75 5.72
BAY VI
(N) DRIVEWAY
(18' WIDE) 4"Ø SOLID PIPE TO CONNECT TO (E) STORM DRAIN, FIELD VERIFY FOUND 1" IP WITH TAG STAMPED L.S. 3451' FROM RECORD POSITION TW:982.67 BW:976.32 TW:978.00 BW:973.38 TW:975.72 BW:970.67 TW:971.16 BW:969.88 TW:973.09 BW:968.50 TW:968.87 BW:967.50 TW:965.48 BW:963.57 (E) DRIVEWAY
#171
#125 APN: 022-062-540
APN: 022-062-580
(E) CONC. WALKWAY EXISTING WOOD RET.WALL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STEEL & WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED

SPRINKLER
SPRINKLER 12"x12" CATCH BASIN RIM=980.5 INV=980.0
4" S.P. BIO SWALE "C" (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET A-5.2) PERMEABLE PAVERS PERMEABLE PAVERS PERMEABLE PAVERS CONCRETE DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES TW=961.0 BW=955.0 TW=961.5 BW=958.0 TW=961.80 BW=958.00 TW=955.9 BW=955.0 TW=955.00 BW=953.10 TW=955.00 BW=951.80 TW=955.00 BW=950.60 TW=958.00 BW=952.00 TW=958.00 BW=952.60TW=958.00 BW=952.70 TW=958.00 BW=953.45 TW=961.20 BW=960.00 4" P.P.
4" P.P.
4" P.P.
4" P.P.
4" P.P.
4" P.P. 4"Ø SOLID PIPE TO DISCHARGE AT DISSIPATION AREA 4"Ø SOLID PIPE TO DISCHARGE AT DISSIPATION AREA CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES (N) CONC. SWALE (N) CONC. SWALE SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
12" TREE
BUSH
5 3 BUSH
18' CANOPY
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE
CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8"
CANOPY
10'
TREE
12" TREECANOPY
20'
6" TREE
CANOPY
8'
20" TREE
30' CANOPY
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE
6"
8" TREE CANOPY
9'
CANOPY
8'
10" TREE
16' CANOPY 10" TREE 8' CANOPY 18" TREE 25' CANOPY 8" TREE 16' CANOPY 4" P.P. TW=962.00 BW=955.35TW=966.00 BW=958.20 TW=968.00 BW=961.10 TW=966.00 BW=960.70 TW=962.00 BW=960.40 (E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK 16 17
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL (ALL SYMBOLS NOT NECESSARILY ON DRAWINGS) 000 CONTOURS @ 2'(Original) CONTOURS @ 10' (E)RETAINING WALL (E)POST POLE LIGHT SITE/GRADING PLAN LEGEND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY LINE CENTER LINE SYMBOLS (E)TRAFFIC SIGN (E)POWER POLE (E)CITY MONUMENT (E)HYDRANT EXISTING TREE EXISTING WOODEN FENCE EXISTING IRON FENCE (E)OVERHEAD POWER LINE (E)ANCHOR (E)TELEPHONE LINE (N) RETAINING WALL (WALL FILL) (N) RETAINING WALL (WALL CUT) BIOSWALE GRADING VOLUME CALCS (ROAD) FILL: 86.08 Cu. yd. CUT: 1,489.97 Cu. yd. GRADING VOLUME CALCS (HOUSE) FILL: 594.82 Cu. yd. CUT: 518.56 Cu. yd. NET: 76.25 Cu. yd. NET: 1,403.89 Cu. yd. (E) STORM DRAIN SD SD (N) CONC. SWALE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 4" SOLID PIPE NEW DRIVEWAY PER CITY STANDARD SEE DETAIL SHEET A4.2 4"Ø P.P
4"Ø P.P
(E)Curb (E)PGE Box (E)WM (E)WM (E)TS

5.72 BAY VIEW ROAD (40')
(N) DRIVEWAY
(18' WIDE) (N) WATER METER 4"Ø SOLID PIPE TO CONNECT TO (E) STORM DRAIN, FIELD VERIFY TW:968.06 BW:965.10 TW:965.48 BW:963.57 (E) DRIVEWAY
(E) CONC. WALKWAY (N) CATCH BASIN RIM=968.00 INV=965.00 SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD 4"Ø SOLID PIPE TO CONNECT TO (E) STORM DRAIN, FIELD VERIFY 12" TREE
3 BUSH
18' CANOPY A-4.1 GRADING PLAN
NORTH SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS: Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525

BENDA-SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET · GRADING PLAN
· BAY VIEW ROAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED CLEAR OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, STORAGE, DEBRIS, AND SOIL. DUST CONTROL AND DAILY ROAD CLEANUP WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED. A PROPERLY SIGNED NO-PARKING ZONE MAY BE ESTABLISHED DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS ONLY. · ALL RECORDED SURVEY POINTS, MONUMENTS, RAILROAD SPIKES, PINS, CROSS CUTS ON TOP OF SIDEWALKS AND TAGS ON TOP OF CULVERT HEADWALLS OR END WALLS WHETHER WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND PRESERVED. IF SURVEY POINT/S ARE ALTERED, REMOVED OR DESTROYED, THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE SERVICES OF A LICENSED SURVEYOR OR QUALIFIED CIVIL ENGINEER TO RESTORE OR REPLACE THE SURVEY POINTS AND RECORD THE REQUIRED MAP PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OF THE FIRST UNIT. · EXISTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE THAT ARE DAMAGED OR DISPLACED SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER EVEN IF DAMAGE OR DISPLACEMENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED FOR THIS PROJECT. ANY DAMAGE TO IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY OR TO ANY PRIVATE PROPERTY, WHETHER ADJACENT TO SUBJECT PROPERTY OR NOT, THAT IS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER TO HAVE RESULTED FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THIS PROJECT, SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. · EXISTING CURB, SIDEWALK OR OTHER STREET IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY FRONTAGE THAT IS DAMAGED OR DISPLACED SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS DEEMED BY THE CITY ENGINEER EVEN IF DAMAGE OR DISPLACEMENT OCCURRED PRIOR TO ANY WORK PERFORMED FOR THIS PROJECT. · APPLICANT SHALL GRIND THE EXISTING ASPHALT STREET PAVEMENT WITH A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES TO STREET CENTERLINE OR TO THE EXTENT OF THE LONGEST UTILITY TRENCH IF BEYOND THE CENTERLINE ALONG BAY VIEW ROAD, AND AN OVERLAY OF CALTRANS SPECIFICATION ½” TYPE 'A' HOT MIX ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED. IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, DAMAGE TO THE PAVEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION IS MORE EXTENSIVE, A LARGER AREA MAY HAVE TO BE GROUND & OVERLAID. ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND MARKERS SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND. · NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACH RAMP AND NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE PER CITY STANDARDS. WHERE THE SIDEWALK CROSSES THE DRIVEWAY APPROACH IT MUST BE ADA- COMPLIANT, PROVIDING NO MORE THAN 2% CROSS-SLOPE FOR NO LESS THAN 48” WIDTH. · ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND FROM THE NEAREST JOINT POLE OR BOX. · NEW WATERLINE FOR FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE PER CITY STANDARDS 300 AND 301 ALLAN BLOCK RETAINING WALL DRIVEWAY DETAIL SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" SEE COMPLETE DRIVEWAY DETAIL ON THIS SHEET 9.a Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 980 985 990 995 1000 980 985 990 995 1000 980 985 990 995 1000 980 985 990 995 1000 -2% -15 10 0 10 15 -15 100 10 15 -15 10
0 10 15 1003 TW:1003.5 BW:994.10 TW:1014.0 BW:1003.0 TW:994.49 BW:989.00 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 990 995 1000 1005 1010 1015 1003 TW:1011.16 BW:1003.00TW:1009.5 BW:1003.0 TW:996.9 BW:989.0 -15 100 10 15 -20 -20 956 960 964 968 972 956 960 964 968 972 964.63 2% -2% 956 960 964 968 972 956 960 964 968 972964.86 2% -2% 960 964 968 972 976 960 964 968 972 976966.42 2% -2% 960 964 968 972 976 960 964 968 972 976968.38 2% -2% 964 968 972 976 980 964 968 972 976 980 970.62 2% -2% 968 972 976 980 984 968 972 976 980 984973.27 2% -2% 968 972 976 980 984 988 968 972 976 980 984 988976.27 2% -2% 972 976 980 984 988 992 972 976 980 984 988 992979.28 2% -2% -20 -16 -12 -8 -4 0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -20 -16 -12 -8 -4
0 4
8 12 16 20 -5
5 -55 TW:999.30 BW:985.75 TW:994.50 BW:982.75 -2% -2% -2% TW:967.55 BW:964.80 TW:965.30 BW:963.20 TW:975.82 BW:970.80 TW:971.16 BW:969.88 TC:982.75 982.25 TW:968.04 BW:965.03 TW:970.00 BW:966.58 TW:973.15 BW:968.55 TW:978.16 BW:973.44 TW:982.71 BW:976.44 TW:988.12 BW:979.45 TW:973.76 BW:972.41 TW:978.50 BW:976.11 TW:983.86 BW:979.11 TC:985.73 TW:965.48 BW:963.57 TW:966.72 BW:965.10 TW:968.87 BW:967.50 -5 5 -55 -2% -2% -2% -2% (E) KEYSTONE RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) KEYSTONE RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) KEYSTONE RET. WALL TO REMAIN AS IS (E) STEEL & WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) KEYSTONE RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) STEEL & WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) KEYSTONE RET. WALL TO REMAIN AS IS (E) CONC. WALKWAY (E) CONC. WALKWAY (E) KEYSTONE RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) STEEL & WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) CONC. WALKWAY (E) WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED (E) WOOD RET. WALL TO BE REMOVED EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EG EGEG EG EG #125 (E) HOUSE #125 (E) HOUSE

PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE (E) CHAIN LINK FENCE A-4.2 J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS: Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525

BENDA-SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET · SECTIONS 9.a
Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) TURN AROUND (SECONDARY PROFILE STA: 2+10.49) 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 980 985 990 995 1000 1005 1010 0+10 0+20 0+30 0+40 0+50 0+60 0+70 0+80 70.00' FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND EXISTING GROUND FINISH GROUND STATION 0+18.31 ELEV: 989.85 TW:1000.60 BW:990.35 TW:989.67 BW:974.00 -2% FILL AREA 1000 TW:1007.9 BW:1000.0 -2% Total Volume Table Station 0+17.00 0+20.00 0+40.00 0+60.00 0+80.00 1+00.00 1+20.00 1+40.00 1+60.00 Fill Area 0.55 0.92 1.12 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cut Area 18.79 14.23 8.06 15.13 20.54 31.20 63.47 113.12 190.80 Fill Volume 0.00 0.08 0.76 0.50 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cut Volume 0.00 1.83 8.26 8.59 13.21 19.16 35.06 65.40 112.11 Cumulative Fill Vol 0.00 0.08 0.84 1.34 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 Cumulative Cut Vol 0.00 1.83 10.09 18.68 31.89 51.05 86.11 151.52 263.63 Total Volume Table Station 1+80.00 2+00.00 2+20.00 2+40.00 2+60.00 2+74.83 Fill Area 0.00 0.00 114.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cut Area 239.84 396.50 426.32 298.54 228.53 0.00 Fill Volume 0.00 0.00 42.33 42.33 0.00 0.00 Cut Volume 159.50 235.68 304.75 268.46 195.21 62.74 Cumulative Fill Vol 1.42 1.42 43.75 86.08 86.08 86.08 Cumulative Cut Vol 423.13 658.81 963.55 1232.02 1427.23 1489.97 ™ NDS, INC. 851 NORTH HARVARD AVE. LINDSAY, CA 93247 TOLL FREE: 1-800-726-1994 PHONE: (559) 562-9888 FAX: (559) 562-4488 www.ndspro.com NOTES: 1. CHANNELS TO BE INSTALLED WITH BLANK GRATE. GRATE TO BE PROTECTED FROM CONCRETE POUR (COVER HOLES WITH TAPE). 2. INSTALLATION TO BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. DO NOT SCALE DRAWING. 4. THIS DRAWING IS INTENDED FOR USE BY ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS, CONSULTANTS AND DESIGN PROFESSIONALS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. 5. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WAS CURRENT AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT BUT MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PRODUCT MANUFACTURER TO BE CONSIDERED ACCURATE. DURA SLOPE INSTALLATION DETAIL - CLASS 'A' & 'B' 4' ENCASEMENT, SUSPENSION METHOD W/ ASPHALT DURA SLOPE TRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM SECTION USE ONLY DURASLOPE CLASS "A" & "B" GRATES WITH THIS APPLICATION. SECTION AT DURASLOPE CHANNEL NEW FELT EXPANSION JOINT 14" MIN. SAW CUT 4" 4" #3 OR #4 REBAR STAKE SUSPENSION METHOD. LENGTH OF STAKE WILL VARY WITH SLOPE OF DRAIN. EXISTING SOIL 4"
MIN. 4" MIN. 4" MIN.

TRENCH DEPTH VARIES WITH SLOPE OF DRAIN 1 A-4.3 J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS: Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525

BENDA-SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26 JAV IER M. CHAVAR IA REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINEER C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET · PROFILE & DETAILS 9.a Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) COMMON NAME SIZE 'GOLDEN GODDESS' GOLDEN GODDESS CONT. SIZE LARGE BROADLEAF TREES BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COND. CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA BUCKEYE COMMON NAME SIZE COND. TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE 1 GAL. CONT. NATIVE BUFFER ZONE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONT. ERIOGONUM LATIFOLIUM* 1 GAL. CONT. CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS 'ARROYO BRITTLE LEAF MANZANITA 1 GAL. CONT. MIMULUS AURANTIACUS* STICKY MONKEY FLOWER SIZE COND. WILD BUCKWHEAT 1 GAL. CONT. FREMONTODENDRON CALIFORNICUM* CONT. FOX TAIL AGAVE IRIS DOUGLASIANA* DOUGLAS IRIS 1 GAL. CONT. MORELLA CALIFORNICA* PACIFIC WAX MYRTLE FRAGARIA CHILOENSIS* CULTIVATED LANDSCAPE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE COND. AZTECORUM MEXICAN WEEPING BAMBOO 5 GAL. CONT. 4"POTS COMMON NAME 1 GAL. CALAMAGROSTIS NUTKAENSIS* PACIFIC REEDGRASS NASSELLA PULCHRA* PURPLE NEEDLE GRASS 1 GAL. CONT. KOELERIA MACRANTHA* CONT. COND. LAWN SOD TURF SHRUBS 1 GAL. BOTANICAL NAME PLATANUS RACEMOSA** COMMON NAME COND. BOTANICAL NAME BAMBOO CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS** 4' - 6' 48" BOX BAMBUSA MULTIPLEX 5 GAL. LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA CRAPE MYRTLE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME COND. COMMON NAME SYCAMORE 8' - 10' BOX AESCULUS CALIFORNICA* VINEBOTANICAL NAME COND. ARTEMISIA CALIFORNICA* CALIFORNIA SAGEBRUSH 1 GAL. BUCKWHEAT DE LA CRUZ* CALIFORNIA LILAC 1 GAL. CONT. ARCTOSTAPHYLOS CRUSTACEA* 1 GAL. CONT. NATIVE GRASS MIX* SEED TRANSITIONAL PLANTING BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME ERIOGONUM LATIFOLIUM* FLANNELBUSH 5 GAL. AGAVE ATTENUATA 5 GAL. CONT. 5 GAL. CONT. COAST STRAWBERRY 4"POTS CONT. OTATEA ACUMINATA MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM MYOPORUM CONT. POLYSTICHUM MUNITUM* 1 GAL. CONT. WESTERN SWORD FERN MEADOW GRASSES BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COND. BLUE RUSH CONT. CONT. 1 GAL. CONT. FESTUCA CALIFORNICA 'RIVER HOUSE BLUES'* CALIFORNIA FESCUE JUNEGRASS 1 GAL. BIO-RETENTION PLANTING BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE JUNCUS PATENS* 1 GAL. CONT. BOTANICAL NAME SMALL BROADLEAF TREES SIZE COND. WESTERN REDBUD SIZE COND. * Indicates plant native to San Mateo County, Source:CalFlora.org ** Indicates plant native to California, Source:Calflora.org Indicates drought tolerant plant (low or very low water use). All other plants are moderate/medium water use, with the exception of cyperus papyrus, which is high water use. COMMON NAME SPRINKLER IRRIGATION SYSTEM CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS 'ARROYO DE LA CRUZ* CALIFORNIA LILAC 1 GAL. CONT. ARCTOSTAPHYLOS CRUSTACEA* BRITTLE LEAF MANZANITA 1 GAL. CONT. 6 7891011
5432
1 ARISTIDA PURPUREA PURPLE THREE-AWN 1 GAL. CONT. CAPE RUSH 1 GAL. CONT. CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM WATER NEEDS LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS WATER NEEDS LOW LOW MEDIUM LOW-MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW LOW-MEDIUM MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW-MEDIUM HIGH LOW LOW -- RETAINING WALL PLANTING HEDERA HELIX COMMON IVY 1 GAL. COMMON NAME CONT. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COND. WATER NEEDS 12 LOW-MEDIUM

GUEST HOUSE

MAIN HOUSE

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY
COURTYARD 11 11 11 11 11
7 7
7 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 5
1 1 10
1 5
5 18.00' DRIVEWAY

7.00' 66 67 68
B
A
4 5
7 8 (E)PLANTING EASEMENT Per Doc#61643AH Vol.6653, Page 82 CALERA TERRACE(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
nk Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE (E)PGE Box (E)TS
#171
#125
)Wooden Fence
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
(E)Wooden Fence
(E)Wooden Fence
ONC. WALKWAY

SPRINKLER

SPRINKLER
(E) KEYSTONE RET.WALL
1 1 10
1 1
3 2
5 5
3 3
3 2
2 3
3 3
3 4
4 3 10
9 9
9 6
6 6 11 11 11 11
1 CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
BUSH
5 3 BUSH
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE
CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8"
CANOPY
10'
TREE
12" TREECANOPY
20'
6" TREE
CANOPY
8'
20" TREE
30' CANOPY
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE
6"
8" TREE CANOPY
9'
CANOPY
8'
5 5
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK 16
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
FOUND 1" IP WITH TAG
STAMPED L.S. 3451' FROM
RECORD POSITION 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. 12. A-5 LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH SCALE: 1"= 10'-0" J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS: Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525

BENDA-SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET · LANDSCAPE PLAN HAMPTON BAY MODEL #IWW1501L-2 Path Lights Walkway 1 Hedera helix on Ret. Walls 12 9.a
Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550)

BIOSWALE
SIZE

BIOSWALE SCHEDULE
25'-10"x9'-4"
*DRAINAGE AREA DRAINAGE AREA
(SQ.FT)
7,799.39

PROPOSED
AREA (SQ.FT)
241.00
822.36 3'-0"x8'-8" 26.00
1,927.79 3'-0"x26'-8" 80.00
*Area to be drained by bioswale,See tributary area definition. *Bioswale area per calculations, see sheet A-5.8
**REQUIRED
AREA (SQ.FT)
233.00

25.00 42.00
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA= 10,549.54 sq.ft.

BIOSWALE
TYPE
1 2
3 TRIBUTARY AREAS DEFINITION

DRAINAGE

AREA CODE
A

DRAINAGE AREA
(SQ.FT)
E
B
D
3,902.17

DESCRIPTION

IMPERVIOUS (ROAD)
1,927.79 IMPERVIOUS (ROAD)
822.36
3,427.99
TOTAL 5,829.96

IMPERVIOUS (ROOF)

IMPERVIOUS (ROOF)
TOTAL 4,719.58
A+B+C
E
D
C 469.23** LOWER DECK
**Only 4.44 % (469.23 sq.ft.) of total project impervious surface will be collected at hancor pipes and then pump it to bioswale "A" = 16'-0"

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

COURTYARD
2 A5.2
BIOSWALE "2"

SEE DETAIL
1 A5.2
BIOSWALE "1"

SEE DETAIL

18.00' DRIVEWAY

7.00'
16 17
69 70
B
A
4 5
7 8
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
RUZ
CALERA TERRACE(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
Key-Stone
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50 (E)WM
(E)PPL
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM (E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
wer System
#171
#125
Fence
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
Fence (E)Wooden Fence
(N) DRIVEWAY (18' WIDE)
BAY VIEW ROAD (40')

SPRINKLER

SPRINKLER
(E) CONC. WALKWAY
(N)WM
BIOSWALE "3"

WITH TRAFFIC RATED

GRATE, SEE DETAIL
3 A5.2
D
A
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
(E) LANDSCAPE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
12" TREE
BUSH 5
3 BUSH
CANOPY 18'
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8" CANOPY
10'TREE
12" TREE
CANOPY
20'
6" TREECANOPY
8'
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE 6"
8" TREE CANOPY 9'
CANOPY 8'
C
B
E
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
BIOSWALE 3
BIOSWALE 1
BIOSWALE 2
· DRAINAGE PLAN
A-5.1
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:

Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525 BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
NORTH SCALE : 1" = 10'-0"
Drainage Plan &
Tributary Areas

9.a
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550)

PLAN VIEW

SECTION A

CLEAN OUT

WITH CAP

OVERFLOW RISER

WITH GRATE
ELEV:989.00 ELEV:988.50
ELEV:989.00 ELEV:989.00
4"Ø PERF. PIPE
(SUBDRAIN) INV.986.00

DISCHARGE
PIPE 6"
INV.986.00
ELEV:988.50

SECTION B
2 AREA= 26.00 SQ.FT 3/8" =1'-0"
BIO SWALE "2" DETAIL

OUTFLOW
B

PLAN VIEW
1 AREA= 284.85 SQ.FT 3/8" =1'-0"
BIO SWALE "1" DETAIL 1'
B 9'-4"
8'-11" 16'-5" 9'-4"
A

CLEAN OUT

WITH CAP
4"Ø PERF. PIPE
(SUBDRAIN)
CHRISTY V12 12"X12"

DRAIN BOX
A 6"
4"Ø PERF. PIPE (SUBDRAIN)

DISCHARGE PIPE
ELEV:982.00

OVERFLOW RISER

WITH GRATE
ELEV:982.00
ELEV:981.50
INV.979.00

SECTION A
INV.979.00
ELEV:981.50

SECTION B

CLEAN OUT
WITH CAP ELEV:982.00 1'

OPENING IN
CURB
A A

OUTFLOW
8'-8" 3'
CHRISTY V12 12"X12"

DRAIN BOX
4"Ø PERF. PIPE
(SUBDRAIN) CLEAN OUT

WITH CAP
B
B
3 AREA= 80.00 SQ.FT 3/8" =1'-0"
BIO SWALE "3" DETAIL

SECTION A

SECTION B
TRAFFIC RATED GRATE 1'

BIO-TREATMENT
SOIL
SAND
6" MIN. CLASS II
PERMEABLE ROCK 1'
12" SAND BIO TREATMENT SOILS
12" SMM WW 12 IN/HR
6" MIN. OF CLASS

II PERMEABLE ROCK
BIO TREATMENT SOILS 12" SMM WW 12 IN/HR SOIL

MEDIA SHALL CONFORM TO APPENDIX K OF THE
SAN MATEO COUNTY C.3 STORM WATER

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE
12" SAND 6" MIN. OF CLASS

II PERMEABLE ROCK

PER CALTRANS

SPECIFICATIONS OR

SIMILAR

MUNICIPALITY-APPROVED

MATERIAL

BIO-TREATMENT
SOIL
12" SAND
6" MIN. CLASS II

PERMEABLE ROCK

BIO-TREATMENT SOIL
SAND
6" MIN. CLASS II

PERMEABLE ROCK

CLEAN OUT

WITH CAP

OVERFLOW RISER

WITH GRATE
ELEV:964.67
ELEV:965.05
INV.961.67

TRAFFIC RATED
GRATE
4"Ø PERF. PIPE
(SUBDRAIN) 12" SAND
BIO TREATMENT SOILS 12" SMM WW 12 IN/HR SOIL

MEDIA SHALL CONFORM TO APPENDIX K OF THE
SAN MATEO COUNTY C.3 STORM WATER

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

PLAN VIEW
A A

OUTFLOW
16'-9" 4'-9"
CHRISTY V12 12"X12"

DRAIN BOX
4"Ø PERF. PIPE (SUBDRAIN) CLEAN OUT

WITH CAP
B
B
9'-5" 16'-10"
OUTLET

REDUCER

HDPE PIPE FLOW
ACCESS
RISER
FLOW

EXCAVATION
TRENCH
90° BEND
NOTES: 1. FOR INSTALLATION RECOMMENDATIONS, SEE STD-702 "TYPICAL RET/DET CROSS-SECTION DETAIL" AND STD-703 "TYPICAL RET/DET/CLEANOUT DETAIL" TO 2-3"Ø C.I. PIPES

CLEANOUT
FLOW
FLOW
90"
(2286 MM)

78.5"
(1994 MM)

71.9"
(1826 MM)
63"
(1600 MM)

53.1"
(1347 MM)

40.7"
(1034 MM)

33.9"
(862 MM)

28.9"
(734 MM)

25.4"
(645 MM)

TYPICAL
SPACING "C"
67"
(1702 MM)
54"
(1372 MM)
48"
(1219 MM) 42" 1067 MM)
36"
(914 MM)
28"
(711 MM) 21"
(533 MM)
18"
(457 MM)

14.5"
(368 MM)

NOMINAL
O.D.
24"
(610 MM) 24"
(610 MM) 24"
(610 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM)
12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM) 12"
(292 MM)
18"
(457 MM)
18"
(457 MM)
18"
(457 MM)
18"
(457 MM)
18"
(457 MM)
H
(TRAFFIC) H(NON-TRAFFIC)
60"
(1500 MM) 24"
(610 MM)
25"
(635 MM)
48"
(1200 MM) 42"
(1050 MM) 24"
(610 MM)
36"
(900 MM) 22"
(559 MM)
30"
(750 MM)
18"
(457 MM) 24"
(600 MM)
13"
(330 MM)
10"
(254 MM)
9"
(229 MM)
13"
(330 MM)
18"
(450 MM)
15"
(375 MM) 12"
(292 MM)
8"
(203 MM)
8"
(203 MM) 11"(279 MM) 12"
(300 MM)
TYPICAL SIDE WALL "X" TYPICAL
SPACING "S"

NOMINAL DIAMETER
NOTES: 1. ALL REFERENCES TO CLASS I OR II MATERIAL ARE PER ASTM D2321 "STANDARD PRACTICE FOR

UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPE FOR SEWERS AND OTHER GRAVITY FLOW APPLICATIONS", LATEST EDITION. 2. ALL RETENTION AND DETENTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION AND THE MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. 3. MEASURES SHOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE MIGRATION OF NATIVE FINES INTO THE BACKFILL MATERIAL, WHEN REQUIRED. SEE ASTM D2321. 4. FILTER FABRIC: A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MAY BE USED AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER TO PREVENT THE MIGRATION OF FINES FROM THE NATIVE SOIL INTO THE SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL. 5. FOUNDATION: WHERE THE TRENCH BOTTOM IS UNSTABLE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL

EXCAVATE TO A DEPTH REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER AND REPLACE WITH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. AS AN ALTERNATIVE AND AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DESIGN ENGINEER, THE TRENCH BOTTOM MAY BE STABILIZED USING A GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL. 6. BEDDING: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I OR II. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY THE ENGINEER, MINIMUM BEDDING THICKNESS SHALL BE 4" (100mm) FOR 4"-24" (100mm-600mm); 6" (150mm) FOR 30"-60" (750mm-900mm). 7. INITIAL BACKFILL: SUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I OR II IN THE PIPE ZONE EXTENDING NOT LESS THAN 6" ABOVE CROWN OF PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION TO ENGINEER. MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED IN ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION. 8. MINIMUM COVER: MINIMUM COVER OVER ALL RETNETION/DETENTION SYSTEMS IN

NON-TRAFFIC
APPLICATIONS (GRASS OR LANDSCAPE AREAS) IS 12" FROM TOP OF PIPE TO GROUND SURFACE.

ADDITIONAL COVER MAY BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT FLOATATION. FOR TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS, MINIMUM COVER IS 12" UP TO 36" DIAMETER PIPE AND 24" OF COVER FOR 42" - 60" DIAMETER PIPE, MEASURED FROM TOP OF PIPE TO BOTTOM OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT OR TO TOP OF RIGID PAVEMENT.
© 2007 HANCOR, INC. REV. DESCRIPTION BY MM/DD/YY CHK'D NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ± 1/2 INCH.

DRAWING NUMBER: NTS

SUITABLE

FOUNDATION

CLASS I OR II MATERIAL

PLACED AND COMPACTED IN

ACCORDANCE WITH
ASTM D2321 IN PIPE ZONE

FILTER FABRIC
(WHERE REQUIRED

BY ENGINEER)
H (RIGID PVMT.) H
(FLEX PVMT.)

UNDISTURBED
EARTH

BEDDING (CLASS I OR II MATERIAL)
= 4" MIN. FOR 12" - 24" PIPE
= 6" MIN. FOR 30" - 60" PIPE
H
(GRASS AREA)
REFER TO STD-702 FOR COVER HEIGHT DETAILS
REFER TO STD-702 FOR COVER HEIGHT DETAILS

CLASS I OR II MATERIAL PER
ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION, COMPACTED IN MAX. 8" LOOSE
LIFTS TO 95% MIN. OF MAX. SPD

CLEANOUT RISER

UNDISTURBED
EARTH

SOLID WALL HDPE CLEANOUT
(4" Ø)
* LOAD BEARING CONCRETE COLLAR

AS SPECIFIED BY DESIGN ENGINEER
(WHERE REQUIRED)

UNDISTURBED
EARTH

CLASS I OR II MATERIAL PER
ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION, COMPACTED IN MAX. 8" LOOSE
LIFTS TO 95% MIN. OF MAX. SPD

SECTION B-B

BEDDING (CLASS I OR II MATERIAL)
= 4" MIN. FOR 12" - 24" HDPE PIPE
= 6" MIN. FOR 30"-60" HDPE PIPE

SECTION A-A

BEDDING (CLASS I OR II MATERIAL)
= 4" MIN. FOR 12" - 24" HDPE PIPE
= 6" MIN. FOR 30"-60" HDPE PIPE

CORRUGATED HDPE RISER
(SPECIFY DIAMETER)

CLASS I OR II MATERIAL PER
ASTM D2321, LATEST EDITION, COMPACTED IN MAX. 8" LOOSE
LIFTS TO 95% MIN. OF MAX. SPD

UNDISTURBED
EARTH
* LOAD BEARING CONCRETE COLLAR

AS SPECIFIED BY DESIGN ENGINEER
(WHERE REQUIRED) FRAME & GRATE
(BY OTHERS)
© 2007 HANCOR, INC
* LOAD BEARING CONCRETE COLLAR SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED

IN TRAFFIC AREAS SUCH THAT THE LIVE LOAD IS TRANSMITTED TO THE SURROUNDING SOIL AND NOT DIRECTLY TO THE RISER.

C LATERAL L

LID (AS REQUIRED)

C LATERAL L
REV. DESCRIPTION BY MM/DD/YY CHK'D NOTE: ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ± 1/2 INCH.

DRAWING NUMBER: NTS CRM
10/23/06 OF
1 UPDATED DRAWING TJR 03/13/07 CKS
TYPE 3: WATERSTOP GASKET W/ CORRUGATED HDPE PIPE
TM
INSTALLATION TO C.I. PIPES/ MANHOLE VIEW

DETAILED CONNECTION VIEW

FILL VOID SPACE WITH ACCEPTABLE GROUT MATERIAL STAINLESS STEEL TAKE-UP CLAMP (2 ~ PLACES) HDPE PIPE
(10"Ø)

ENSURE BACKFILL IS

PLACED UNDER PIPE AND

PROPERLY COMPACTED

STRUCTURE WALL NON-SHRINK

PATCHING

COMPOUND

STAINLESS STEEL TAKE-UP CLAMP SCREWS WILL BE
PLACED 180° FROM EACH OTHER

E HARVESTING STORAGE SYSTEM
NTS
6" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK

PER CALTRANS SPECIFICATIONS OR

SIMILAR MUNICIPALITY-APPROVED

MATERIAL

DISCHARGE
PIPE
4"-6" RIP RAP
4" Ø SOLID PIPE
EXISTING GROUND 12"
5'-0"
4"Ø PERF. PIPE
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'
DISSIPATION AREA DETAIL 4
· DRAINAGE DETAILS
A-5.2
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:

Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525 BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 14 15
16 17
70 B
A
4 5
7 8
13 RUZ
CALERA TERRACE(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence

18.00' DRIVEWAY
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50 (E)WM
(E)PPL
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM
(E)WM (E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
ewer System
#171
#125
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
(E)PLANTING
EASEMENT Per
Doc#61643AH
Vol.6653, Page 82
Fence (E)Wooden Fence
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
(N) DRIVEWAY (18' WIDE) BAY VIEW ROAD (40
)

7.00'
(N) WATER
METER

JOINT TRENCH FOR GAS,

ELECTRIC AND CATV

4.75 5.72 (E) CONC. WALKWAY

SPRINKLER

SPRINKLER
(E) KEYSTONE RET.WALL
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
R28'
R52'
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
12" TREE
BUSH 5
3 BUSH
CANOPY 18'
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8" CANOPY
10'TREE
12" TREE
CANOPY
20'
6" TREECANOPY
8'
18"
TREE 6"
8" TREE CANOPY 9'
CANOPY 8'
FOUND 1" IP WITH TAG
STAMPED L.S. 3451' FROM

RECORD POSITION
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
CONTOURS @ 2'(Original)
CONTOURS @ 10'
(E)RETAINING WALL
(E)POST POLE LIGHT

SITE/GRADING PLAN LEGEND

DESCRIPTION

PROPERTY LINE

CENTER LINE

SYMBOLS
(ALL SYMBOLS NOT NECESSARILY ON DRAWINGS)
(E)TRAFFIC SIGN
(E)POWER POLE
(E)CITY MONUMENT
(E)HYDRANT

EXISTING TREE

EXISTING WOODEN FENCE

EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
(E)OVERHEAD POWER LINE
000
(E)ANCHOR
LEGAL OWNER: Robert Benda & John H. Spenker
LOT ADDRESS: Bay View Rd. - Calera Terrace
Pacifica, CA 94044
LOTS: 6, 13, 14, 15,
TOTAL AREA: 26,055.41 Sq. Ft.

0.60 Ac.

APN: 022 - 062 - 550

LOT INFORMATION

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING (E)

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH

STORM DRAIN INLET SDI

WATER VALVE WV

WATER METER WM

CATCH BASIN CB

FIRE HYDRANT FH

POWER POLE PP

POWER POLE LIGHT PPL

TRAFFIC SIGN TS
ORIGINAL LOT NUMBER 00
(E)TELEPHONE LINE

CALCULATED (C)

FOUND CROSS CUT ON TOP OF

CONCRETE CURB
(E) SEWER LINE S S S S
(E) WATER LINE W W W W
(E) GAS LINE G G
(N) SEWER LINE
(N) WATER LINE
(E) STORM DRAIN SD SD
project no sheet no.

Drawn by:

Checked by: JC

DATE ISSUED FOR
Sheet:
225 ROCKAWAY BEACH AVE. No 400
FAX (650) 355 8965
(650) 355 0615

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
PACIFICA, CA 94044
REMARKS:

ENGINEERING
J C BAY VIEW RD - CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN : 022 - 062 - 550 290614 A-5.3

UTILITY PLAN
NORTH
SCALE: 1"= 10'-0"
· UTILITY PLAN
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550)

DRIVEWAY

DRIVEWAY

COURTYARD

18.00' DRIVEWAY

7.00'
16 69
70 B
A
4 5
7 8
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

TA CRUZ
CALERA TERRACE(40')
CE(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
E)Key-Stone
et. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50 (E)WM
(E)PPL
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM (E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
(E) Ø=6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
#171
#125
Fence
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
den Fence (E)Wooden Fence
(N) DRIVEWAY (18' WIDE) BAY VIEW RO

SPRINKLER

SPRINKLER
(E) CONC. WALKWAY
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
12" TREE
BUSH 5
3 BUSH
CANOPY 18'
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8" CANOPY
10'TREE
12" TREE
CANOPY
20'
6" TREECANOPY
8'
20"
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE 6"
8" TREE CANOPY 9'
CANOPY 8'
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
SITE
COLOR

CODE AREA TYPE AREA
(Sq.Ft.)
IMPERVIOUS DRIVEWAY 5,829.96
IMPERVIOUS ROOF 4,719.58
PERMEABLE PAVERS 350.65
LANDSCAPE (DISTURBED-GRADING) 3,907.23
UNDISTURBED LANDSCAPE 11,247.99
TOTAL SITE AREA 26,055.41
=15,133.41 Sq.Ft. (0.347 ACRES)

TOTAL PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AREA
[(impervious driveway+impervious roof+permeable pavers+landscape (disturbed-grading)] = · SITE AREA USE
A-5.4
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:

Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525 BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
NORTH SCALE : 1" = 10'-0"

SITE AREA USE

9.a
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 64
65 66
67 68
69 72 70
71 C
B
A
1 2
3 4
5 7
8 13

SANTA CRUZ

BAY VIEW
CALERA TERRACE(40')
9 8
7 CALERA TERRACE(40')
TERRACE(40')
ROAD(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
1" = 16'-0"
(E)Chain Link Fence

18.00' DRIVEWAY
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)WV
(E)WV
(E)CB

EXISTING FIRE

HYDRANT
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)PP
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50 (E)WM
(E)PPL
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM
(E)WM (E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
(E) Ø=6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
#171
#125
(E)Wooden Fence
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
(E)PLANTING
EASEMENT Per
Doc#61643AH
Vol.6653, Page 82
(E)Wooden Fence (E)Wooden Fence
BAY VIEW ROAD(40')
(N) DRIVEWAY (18' WIDE) BAY VIEW ROAD (40')

7.00'

4.75 5.72 (E) CONC. WALKWAY

SPRINKLER

SPRINKLER
(E) KEYSTONE RET.WALL

FIRE HOSE

LINE FROM

HYDRANT

FIRE HOSE LINE

FROM HYDRANT
TO DW 88.63'

FIRE HOSE LINE

FROM HYDRANT
TOTAL LENGTH:
422.00 FT
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
R28'
R52'

FIRE HOSE LINE

FROM HYDRANT
TOTAL LENGTH:
460.00 FT

FIRE HOSE LINE

FROM HYDRANT
TOTAL LENGTH:
363.00 FT
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
12" TREE
BUSH
5 3 BUSH
CANOPY 18'
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8" CANOPY
10'TREE
12" TREE
CANOPY
20'
6" TREECANOPY
8'
20" TREE
30' CANOPY
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE 6"
8" TREE CANOPY
9'
CANOPY 8'
FOUND 1" IP WITH TAG
STAMPED L.S. 3451' FROM

RECORD POSITION
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
CONTOURS @ 2'(Original)
CONTOURS @ 10'
(E)RETAINING WALL
(E)POST POLE LIGHT

SITE/GRADING PLAN LEGEND

DESCRIPTION

PROPERTY LINE

CENTER LINE

SYMBOLS
(ALL SYMBOLS NOT NECESSARILY ON DRAWINGS)
(E)TRAFFIC SIGN
(E)POWER POLE
(E)CITY MONUMENT
(E)HYDRANT

EXISTING TREE

EXISTING WOODEN FENCE

EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
(E)OVERHEAD POWER LINE
000
(E)ANCHOR
LEGAL OWNER: Robert Benda & John H. Spenker
LOT ADDRESS: Bay View Rd. - Calera Terrace
Pacifica, CA 94044
LOTS: 6, 13, 14, 15,
TOTAL AREA: 26,055.41 Sq. Ft.

0.60 Ac.

APN: 022 - 062 - 550

LOT INFORMATION

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING (E)

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH

STORM DRAIN INLET SDI

WATER VALVE WV

WATER METER WM

CATCH BASIN CB

FIRE HYDRANT FH

POWER POLE PP

POWER POLE LIGHT PPL

TRAFFIC SIGN TS
ORIGINAL LOT NUMBER 00
(E)TELEPHONE LINE

CALCULATED (C)

FOUND CROSS CUT ON TOP OF

CONCRETE CURB
(E) SEWER LINE S S S S
(E) WATER LINE W W W W
(E) GAS LINE G G
(N) SEWER LINE
(N) WATER LINE

FIRE HOSE LINE
project no sheet no.

Drawn by:

Checked by: JC

DATE ISSUED FOR
Sheet:
225 ROCKAWAY BEACH AVE. No 400
FAX (650) 355 8965
(650) 355 0615

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
PACIFICA, CA 94044
REMARKS:

ENGINEERING
J C BAY VIEW RD - CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN : 022 - 062 - 550 290614 A-5.5

FIRE HOSE PLAN
NORTH
SCALE: 1"= 16'-0"
· FIRE HOSE PLAN
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 66
67 68
69 72 70
71 C
B
A
3 4
5 7
8 13

SANTA CRUZ
9 CALERA TERRACE(40')
TERRACE(40')
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Curb
(E)Key-Stone Ret. Wall
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)Chain Link Fence

18.00' DRIVEWAY
(E)Chain Link Fence
(E)HOUSE
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)Sidewalk Curb and Gutter
(E)TS
(E)TS
(E)TS
RIM=906.16
NV=904.50
(E)SDI
RIM=905.57
INV=904.41
(E)SDI
RIM=905.81
(E)PP
(E)TS
(E)SSMH
ASSUMED ELEV.

RIM=948.83
INV=941.50 (E)WM
(E)PPL
(E)PGE
Box
(E)WM
(E)WM (E)TS
(E) Ø 6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
(E) Ø=6" Clay Pipe S. Sewer System
#171
#125
(E)Wooden Fence
(E)PLANTING EASEMENT(7'WIDE)
(E)PLANTING
EASEMENT Per
Doc#61643AH
Vol.6653, Page 82
(E)Wooden Fence (E)Wooden Fence
BAY VIEW ROAD(40')
(N) DRIVEWAY (18' WIDE) BAY VIEW ROAD (40')

7.00'

4.75 5.72 (E) CONC. WALKWAY

SPRINKLER

SPRINKLER
(E) KEYSTONE RET.WALL
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
CONC. DRIVEWAY W/ GROOVES
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
SILT
FENCE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
(N) CONC. SWALE
12" TREE
10" TREE
BUSH
5 3 BUSH
CANOPY 18'
CANOPY
16'
6" TREE
6" TREE
6" TREE CANOPY
8'
CANOPY
12'
CANOPY
12'
10" TREE CANOPY
15'
8" CANOPY
10'TREE
12" TREE
CANOPY
20'
6" TREE
CANOPY
8'
10" TREE
CANOPY
8'
18" TREE
25' CANOPY
8" TREE
CANOPY
16'
20" TREE
30' CANOPY
18" TREE
20' CANOPY
TREE 6"
8" TREE CANOPY
9'
CANOPY 8'
FOUND 1" IP WITH TAG
STAMPED L.S. 3451' FROM

RECORD POSITION
DECK
(E)HOUSE
Top of Bank

PLANTER

PLANTER
DECK
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
KEY-STONE RET. WALL
CONTOURS @ 2'(Original)
CONTOURS @ 10'
(E)RETAINING WALL
(E)POST POLE LIGHT

SITE/GRADING PLAN LEGEND

DESCRIPTION

PROPERTY LINE

CENTER LINE

SYMBOLS
(ALL SYMBOLS NOT NECESSARILY ON DRAWINGS)
(E)TRAFFIC SIGN
(E)POWER POLE
(E)CITY MONUMENT
(E)HYDRANT

EXISTING TREE

EXISTING WOODEN FENCE

EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE
(E)OVERHEAD POWER LINE
000
(E)ANCHOR
LEGAL OWNER: Robert Benda & John H. Spenker
LOT ADDRESS: Bay View Rd. - Calera Terrace
Pacifica, CA 94044
LOTS: 6, 13, 14, 15,
TOTAL AREA: 26,055.41 Sq. Ft.

0.60 Ac.

APN: 022 - 062 - 550

LOT INFORMATION

ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING (E)

SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH

STORM DRAIN INLET SDI

WATER VALVE WV

WATER METER WM

CATCH BASIN CB

FIRE HYDRANT FH

POWER POLE PP

POWER POLE LIGHT PPL

TRAFFIC SIGN TS
ORIGINAL LOT NUMBER 00
(E)TELEPHONE LINE

CALCULATED (C)

FOUND CROSS CUT ON TOP OF

CONCRETE CURB
(E) SEWER LINE S S S S
(E) WATER LINE W W W W
(E) GAS LINE G G
(N) SEWER LINE
(N) WATER LINE

SILT FENCE
project no sheet no.

Drawn by:

Checked by: JC

DATE ISSUED FOR
Sheet:
225 ROCKAWAY BEACH AVE. No 400
FAX (650) 355 8965
(650) 355 0615

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
PACIFICA, CA 94044
REMARKS:

ENGINEERING
J C BAY VIEW RD - CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN : 022 - 062 - 550 290614 A-5.6

EROSION CONTROL
NORTH SCALE: 1"= 16'-0"
· EROSION CONTROL
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550)

MATERIALS & WASTE MANAGEMENT

NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
· BERM AND COVER STOCKPILES OF SAND, DIRT OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION

MATERIAL WITH TARPS WHEN RAIN IS FORECAST OR IF NOT ACTIVELY BEING USED WITHIN 14 DAYS.
· USE (BUT DON'T OVERUSE) RECLAIMED WATER FOR DUST CONTROL

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
· LABEL ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (SUCH AS

PESTICIDES, PAINTS, THINNERS, SOLVENTS, FUEL, OIL, AND ANTIFREEZE) IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, COUNTY, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. · STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTES IN WATER TIGHT CONTAINERS,

STORE IN APPROPRIATE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, AND COVER THEM AT THE

END OF EVERY WORK DAY OR DURING WET WEATHER OR WHEN RAINS IS FORECAST.
· FOLLOW MANUFACTURER´S APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND BE CAREFUL NOT TO USE MORE THAN NECESSARY. DO NOT APPLY CHEMICALS OUTDOORS WHEN RAIN IS FORECAST WITHIN 24HOURS. · ARRANGE FOR APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL OF ALL HAZARDOUS WASTES.

WASTE MANAGEMENT
· COVER WASTE DISPOSAL CONTAINERS SECURELY WITH TARPS AT THE END OF EVERY WORK DAY AND DURING WET WEATHER.
· CHECK WASTE DISPOSAL CONTAINERS FREQUENTLY FOR LEAKS AND TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE NOT OVERFILLED. NEVER HOSE DOWN A DUMPSTER ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
· CLEAN OR REPLACE PORTABLE TOILETS, AND INSPECT THEM FREQUENTLY FOR LEAKS AND SPILLS.
· DISPOSE OF ALL WASTES AND DEBRIS PROPERLY. RECYCLE MATERIALS AND

WASTES THAT CAN BE RECYCLED (SUCH AS ASPHALT, CONCRETE,AGGREGATE

BASE MATERIALS, WOOD, GYP, BOARD, PIPE, ETC)
· DISPOSE OF LIQUID RESIDUES FROM PAINTS, THINNERS, SOLVENTS, GLUES, AND CLEANING FLUIDS AS HAZARDOUS WASTE.

CONSTRUCTIONS ENTRANCE AND PERIMETER
· ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN EFFECTIVE PERIMETER CONTROLS AND STABILIZE ALL

CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND EXITS TO SUFFICIENTLY CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM SITE AND TRACKING OFF SITE. · SWEEP OR VACUUM ANY STREET TRACKING IMMEDIATELY AND SECURE SEDIMENT SOURCE TO PREVENT FURTHER TRACKING. NEVER HOSE DOWN STREETS TO CLEAN UP TRACKING.

EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT & SPILL

CONTROL

MAINTENANCE AND PARKING
· DESIGNATE AN AREA, FITTED WITH APPROPRIATE BMPs, FOR
VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT PARKING AND STORAGE.
· PERFORM MAJOR MAINTENANCE , REPAIR JOBS, AND
VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING OFF SITE.
· IF REFUELING OR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE MUST BE DONE

ONSITE, WORK IN A BERMED AREA AWAY FROM STORM

DRAINS AND OVER A DRIP PAN OR DROP CLOTHS BIG
ENOUGH TO COLLECT FLUIDS. RECYCLE OR DISPOSE OF
FLUIDS AS HAZARDOUS WASTE.
· IF VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT CLEANING BE DONE ONSITE,

CLEAN WITH WATER ONLY IN A BERMED AREA THAT WILL

NOT ALLOW RINSE WATER TO RUN INTO GUTTERS, STREETS,
STORM DRAINS, OR SURFACE WATERS.
· DO NOT CLEAN VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT ONSITE USING

SOAPS, SOLVENTS, DEGREASERS, OR STEAM CLEANING
EQUIPMENT.

SPILL PREVENTION AND CONTROL
· KEEP SPILL CLEANUP MATERIALS (E.G, RAGS, ABSORBENTS

AND CAT LITTER) AVAILABLE AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT
ALL TIMES.
· INSPECT VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FREQUENTLY FOR AND
REPAIR LEAKS PROMPTLY . USE DRIP PANS TO CATCH LEAKS
UNTIL REPAIRS ARE MADE.
· CLEAN UP SPILLS OR LEAKS IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSE OF
CLEANUP MATERIALS PROPERLY.
· CO NOT HOSE DOWN SURFACES WHERE FLUIDS HAVE
SPILLED. USE DRY CLEANUP METHODS (ABSORBENT

MATERIALS, CAT, LITTER, AND/ OR RAGS)
· SWEEP UP SPILLED DRY MATERIALS IMMEDIATELY . DO NOT
TRY TO WASH THEM AWAY WITH WATER, OR BURY THEM.
· CLEAN UP SPILLS ON DIRT AREAS BY DIGGING UP AND
PROPERLY DISPOSING OF CONTAMINATED SOIL.
· REPORT SIGNIFICANT SPILLS IMMEDIATELY. YOU ARE

REQUIRED BY LAW TO REPORT ALL SIGNIFICANT RELEASES
OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, INCLUDING OIL. TO REPORT A
SPILL: 1) DIAL 911 OR YOUR LOCAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE
NUMBER, 2) CALL THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY
SERVICES WARNING CENTER, (800) 852-7550 (24 HOURS)

EARTHMOVING
· SCHEDULE GRADING AND EXCAVATION WORK

DURING DRY WEATHER
· STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS, INSTALL AND

MAINTAIN TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROLS
(SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL FABRIC OR

BONDED FIBER MATRIX) UNTIL VEGETATION IS

ESTABLISHED
· REMOVE EXISTING VEGETATION ONLY WHEN

ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY, AND SEED OR

PLANT VEGETATION FOR EROSION CONTROL

ON SLOPES OR WHERE CONSTRUCTION IS NOT
IMMEDIATELY PLANNED.
· PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM MIGRATING OFFSITE

AND PROTECT STORM DRAIN INLETS, GUTTERS,

DITCHES, AND DRAINAGE COURSES BY

INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING APPROPRIATE
BMP,s SUCH AS FIBER ROLLS, SILT FENCES,

SEDIMENTS BASINS , GRAVEL BAGS, BERMS,
ETC.
· KEEP EXCAVATED SOIL ON SITE AND

TRANSFER IT TO DUMP TRUCKS ON SITE, NOT
IN THE STREETS.

CONTAMINATED SOILS
· IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE

OBSERVED, TEST FOR CONTAMINATION AND

CONTACT THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD: - UNUSUAL SOIL CONDITIONS,DISCOLORATION,

OR ODOR
- ABANDONED UNDERGROUND TANKS
- BURIED BARRELS, DEBRIS, OR TRASH

PAVING / ASPHALT WORK
· AVOID PAVING AND SEAL COATING IN WET

WEATHER OR WHEN RAIN IS FORECAST,

TO PREVENT MATERIALS THAT HAVE NOT

CURED FROM CONTACTING STORM
WATER RUNOFF.
· COVER STORM DRAIN INLETS AND

MANHOLES WHEN APPLYING SEAL COAT,

TACK COAT, SLURRY SEAL, FOG SEAL,
ETC.
· COLLECT AND RECYCLE OR

APPROPRIATELY DISPOSE OF EXCESS
ABRASIVE GRAVEL OR SAND. DO NOT
SWEEP OR WASH IT INTO GUTTERS.
· DO NOT USE WATER TO WASH DOWN
FRESH ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT.

SAWCUTTING & ASPHALT/CONCRETE

REMOVAL
· PROTECT NEARBY STORM DRAIN INLETS
WHEN SAW CUTTING. USE FILTER FABRIC,

CATCH BASIN INLET FILTERS, OR GRAVEL

BAGS TO KEEP SLURRY OUT IF THE
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM.
· SHOVEL, ABOSORB, OR VACUUM SAW-CUT

SLURRY AND DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE AS

SOON AS YOU ARE FINISHED IN ONE

LOCATION OR AT THE END OF EACH

WORK DAY (WHICHEVER IS SOONER)
· IF SAWCUT SLURRY ENTERS A CATCH
BASIN, CLEAN IT UP IMMEDIATELY.

CONCRETE, GROUT & MORTAR

APPLICATION
· STORE CONCRETE, GROUT AND MORTAR AWAY

FROM STORM DRAINS OR WATERWAYS, AND ON

PALLETS UNDER COVER TO PROTECT THEM FROM
RAIN, RUNOFF, AND WIND.
· WASH OUT CONCRETE EQUIPMENT/ TRUCKS

OFFSITE OR IN A DESIGNATED WASHOUT AREA,

WHERE THE WATER WILL FLOW INTO A

TEMPORARY WASTE PIT, AND IN A MANNER THAT

WILL PREVENT LEACHING INTO THE UNDERLYING
SOIL OR ONTO SURROUNDING AREAS. LET

CONCRETE HARDEN AND DISPOSE OF AS
GARBAGE.
· WHEN WASHING EXPOSED AGGREGATE , PREVENT
WASHWATER FROM ENTERING STORM DRAINS.

BLOCK ANY INLETS AND VACUUM GUTTERS, HOSE

WASHWATER ONTO DIRT AREAS, OR DRAIN ONTO

A BERMED SURFACE TO BE PUMPED AND
DISPOSED OF PROPERLY.

LANDSCAPING
· PROTECT STOCKPILED LANDSCAPING MATERIALS

FROM WIND AND RAIN BY STORING THEM UNDER

TARPS ALL YEAR-ROUND
· STACK BAGGED MATERIAL ON PALLETS AND
UNDER COVER.
· DISCONTINUE APPLICATION OF ANY ERODIBLE
LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WITHIN 2 DAYS BEFORE A

FORECAST RAIN EVENT OR DURING WET
WEATHER.

PAINTING & PAINT REMOVAL
· NEVER CLEAN BRUSHES OR RINSE PAINT

CONTAINERS INTO A STREET, GUTTER, STORM

DRAIN, OR STREAM
· FOR WATER-BASED PAINTS, PAINT OUT BRUSHES

TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, AND RINSE INTO A
DRAIN THAT GOES TO THE SANITARY SEWER.

NEVER POUR PAINT DOWN A STORM DRAIN
· FOR OIL-BASED PAINTS, PAINT OUT BRUSHES TO

THE EXTENT POSSIBLE AND CLEAN WITH THINNER
OR SOLVENT IN A PROPER CONTAINER. FILTER
AND REUSE THINNERS AND SOLVENTS. DISPOSE
OF EXCESS LIQUIDS AS HAZARDOUS WASTE.
· PAINT CHIPS AND DUST FROM NON-HAZARDOUS

DRY STRIPPING AND SAND BLASTING MAY BE

SWEPT UP OR COLLECTED IN PLASTIC DROP
CLOTHS AND DISPOSED OF AS TRASH.
· CHEMICAL PAINT STRIPPING RESIDUE AND CHIPS

AND DUST FROM MARINE PAINTS OR PAINTS

CONTAINING LEAD MERCURY, OR TRIBUTYLTIN

MUST BE DISPOSED OF AS HAZARDOUS
WASTE.LEAD BASED PAINT REMOVAL REQUIRES A
STATE-CERTIFICATED CONTRACTOR.

DEWATERING
· DISCHARGES OF GROUNDWATER OR CAPTURED

RUNOFF FROM DEWATERING OPERATIONS MUST
BE PROPERLY MANAGED AND DISPOSED. WHEN

POSSIBLE SEND DEWATERING DISCHARGE TO
LANDSCAPE AREA OR SANITARY SEWER. IF

DISCHARGING TO THE SANITARY SEWER CALL
YOUR LOCAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.
· DIVERT RUN-ON WATER FROM OFFSITE AWAY

FROM ALL DISTURBED AREAS
· WHEN DEWATERING, NOTIFY AND OBTAIN

APPROVAL FROM THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

BEFORE DISCHARGING WATER TO A STREET
GUTTER OR STORM DRAIN. FILTRATION OR

DIVERSION THROUGH A BASIN, TANK OR SEDIMENT

TRAP MAY BE REQUIRED
· IN AREAS OF KNOWN OR SUSPECTED

CONTAMINATION, CALL YOUR LOCAL AGENCY TO

DETERMINE WHETHER THE GROUND WATER MUST
BE TESTED. PUMPED GROUNDWATER MAY NEED

TO BE COLLECTED AND HAULED OFF-SITE FOR

TREATMENT AND PROPER DISPOSAL
CONSTRUCTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs)

CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT , THE STORM WATER BEST (MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ( BMP) O THIS PAGE, AS HER APPLY TO YOU PROJECT, ALL YEAR LONG.

STORM DRAIN POLLUTERS MAY BE LIABLE FOR FINES OF UP TO $10,000 PER DAY project no sheet no.

Drawn by:

Checked by: JC

DATE ISSUED FOR
Sheet:
225 ROCKAWAY BEACH AVE. No 400
FAX (650) 355 8965
(650) 355 0615

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
PACIFICA, CA 94044
REMARKS:

ENGINEERING
J C BAY VIEW RD - CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN : 022 - 062 - 550 290614 A-5.7
· CONSTRUCTION BEST

MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
(BMPs)
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) · BIOSWALE CALCULATIONS
A-5.8
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:

Sheet:

DATE ISSUED FOR
Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525 BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
BIOSWALE #1 BIOSWALE #2 BIOSWALE #3
Required area
Proposed area
Required area
Proposed area
Required area
Proposed area

9.a
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) E
E
2 2
G
G
10 10
J
J
D
D
D01
D02
D03 D07
D05 D06 D13 D12 D11 D09
W01
W10 W09
W13 D/W
DN
OFFICE
7'-11"x16'-0"

GUEST ROOM
15'-6"x10'-6"
CLOSET
6'-0"x3'-9"
BATH
6'-0"x8'-0"
5'-0"x5'-5"
POWDER
ROOM

ELEVATOR
6'-0"x5'-5"

GREAT ROOM
15'-5"x27'-8"

KITCHEN
15'-5"x12'-7"

DBL OVEN
REF.

MUDDROOM

61.33 SQ.FT.

PANTRY

35.93 Sq.Ft.

GARAGE
19'-10"x20'-0"
GARAGE
10'-11"18'-0" BALCONY 185.25 SQ FT
20 (R)=7.5"
19 (T)=11"
MECH. EQUIP.

MAIN FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"

UTILITY BROOMS / MOP

LAUNDRY
SHOOT
42" HIGH

RAILING
ENTRY
4:12
DN
985.00
985.00
983.00
986.50
986.50
GAS

FIREPLACE
A-9 A-9
A A
A-11
C
I
I
9 9
6 6
1 1
4 4
5 5
B
B
C
C
F
F
11 11
3 3
7 7
8 8
4:12
4:12

PROJECTION

LOWER FLOOR

PROJECTION

LOWER FLOOR

PROJECTION

LOWER FLOOR

PROJECTION

LOWER FLOOR
W12
W01
W12 W11 D06 D06 D04 BALCONY 72.17 SQ FT
6'-2"
A-10
A-10 B
B BALCONY 558.01 SQ FT BALCONY 88.86 SQ FT
A
A
44'-5" 30'-7" 30' 12'-4" 17'-11" 15'
6'-2"
6'-5"
12'-4"
135°
14'-5"
8'-6"
20'-4"
14'-2"
19'
20'-4"
11'-11"
15'-5" 6'-8"135° 20' 4'-6"
13'-5" 5'
18'-10" 5'-11" 5'-11" 4'-3" 8'-6" 15'-9" 18'-8" 1'-9" 36'-2" 33'-2" 25'-9" 29'-2"
25'-4" 18'-1" 13'-5"
36'-10"
8'-6"
15'-4"
6'-9"
30'-7"
6"
10'-11"
D03
985.00
DN
985.00
983.00
983.00
983.00
4'
4 (R)=7.5"
3 (T)=11"
985.00 4 (R)=6" 3 (T)=11"

7.757.75

2.5 989.00 987.50
DN
4'-3" 4'-10"
3 (R)=6"
2 (T)=11"

ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT
984.83
984.83
DN
983.00
DN
4 (R)=5" 3 (T)=15"
D03
W02 W05 W06 W07 W08
4 (R)=6"
3 (T)=11"
4:12 11'-6" 86'-9"
18'
23'-1"
3'-6"
8"
15'-6" 10'-6" 16' 3'-5"
8'-11"
4'-6"
6' 12'-7" 27'-8" 17'-1" 13'-5" 1'-11"
6'-2" 16' 7' 8'-11"
23'
56'-10"
8'-6"
6'-2"
W21
W21 W11 W11
W01 W03
5'-6"
3'-11" 8'-10" CABINETS
8'-6"
4'-5"
CABINETS CABINETS 6'-5" 6'-2" D04 D04
A-12 A-12
D D
2 2
A
A

LOWER FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"

ELEVATOR
6'-0"x5'-5"

CABINETS SHELVES

SHELVES BUILT IN CLOSET

SHELVES

LAUNDRY

86.61.FT.

MASTER BEDROOM
14'-7" x14'-2"
CLOSET
6'-7"x6'-0"
CLOSET
7'-1"x6'-0"
BATH
8'-11"x5'-6"
BEDROOM 1
11'-7"x11'-2"

PLAYROOM
15'-3"x10'-6" HALLWAY HALLWAY
BEDROOM 2
11'-7"x11'-2"
BATH
7'-5"x5'-6"

MEDIA CL

32.8 Sq.Ft. MECH 8'-2"x4'-11"

LAUNDRY
SHOOT

CRAWL SPACE AREA

BELOW GARAGE

CABINETS
STORAGE 4'-2"x4'-9"
BATH
8'-11"x9'-9"
3'-2"
3'-2" 20 (R)=7.5" 19 (T)=11"

BUILT IN
CLOSET
975.00
A-9 A-9
A A

PROJECTION

MAIN FLOOR

PROJECTION

MAIN FLOOR

PROJECTION

MAIN FLOOR

PROJECTION

MAIN FLOOR
A-11
C
10 10
9 9
6 6
1 1
4 4
5 5
11 11
3 3
7 7
8 8
8'-1"
W18 W19 W17W18 D08 D10 D04
D04
D16 D05 D12 D16 D04 D04 D06 D06 D06
D04 D04
D15
D14 BALCONY 558.01 SQ FT BALCONY 88.86 SQ FT
6' A-10
A-10 B
B
G
G
D
D
B
B
C
C
E
E
F
F 11'-2" 10'-6" 11'-2" 1'-3" 9'-11"
3' 2'-9" 7'-10" 4'-3" 5'-6" 14'-2" 8'-8" 5'-5" 16'-1" 1'-9" 20'-8" 17'-11" 14'-1" 6'-5" 8'-9"
6'-4" 1'-5"
14'-7"
6'
3'-5"
3'-3" 5'-8" 4'-8"
13'-7" 2'-6"
6 6
975.00
975.00
6'-4"
973.00
973.00
973.00
973.00
UP
975.00
975.00
974.83
976.83
972.83
974.83
11'-3" 11'-6" 11'
42'-6"
W02
W04 W14 W15 W14 W16
DN
4 (R)=6"
3 (T)=11"
W20
7'-5" 5'-6"
11'-7"
15'-3"
11'-7" 5'-6"
8'-11"
1'-5" 2'-6" 6'
4'-11" 8'-2" 4'-6" 7'-1" 6'-7" 45' 6'-5" 11'-6" 77' 11'-6" 88'-6" 12'-9" 5'-11" 20'-4" 11' 88'-6" A-11 A-11
C C
DN
4(R) @ 6"
3(T) @ 11"
DN
973.00

LIBRARY / HOMEWORK AREA
4(R) @ 6"
3(T) @ 11"
A-12 A-12
D D
· PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS
A-6
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:BENDA -SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
D##: SEE DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A6.1
W##: SEE WINDOWS SCHEDULE SHEET A6.1
D##: SEE DOOR SCHEDULE SHEET A6.1
W##: SEE WINDOWS SCHEDULE SHEET A6.1 NORTH NORTH

9.a
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550)

ELEVATOR

CRAWL SPACE AREA
BELOW GARAGE BALCONY 558.01 SQ FT BALCONY 88.86 SQ FT
UP
DN
DN
DN
DN BALCONY 185.25 SQ FT
ENTRY
4:12
DN
4:12
4:12 BALCONY 72.17 SQ FT BALCONY 558.01 SQ FT BALCONY 88.86 SQ FT DN

7.757.75

2.5 DN
DN
DN
4:12 B
A
D
C
E
F
G
J
H
I
K
L

MAIN FLOOR PLAN AREA CALCULATION
SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"

LOWER FLOOR PLAN AREA CALCULATION
SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
2'-10" 11' 16'-6" 6'-10" 23'-3" 17'-8" 11'-4" 86'-7"16' 7' 3'-11" 29'-10" 12'-9" 5'-11" 8'-10" 20'-11" 7'-8" 8'-5" 13'-5" 1'-11" 86'-9" 7'-8" 11'-6" 6'-3" 10'-1" 7'-10" 13'-5"
56'-10"
V P
R
S
Q
U
T
8' 7'-11" 15'-7"
42'-6" 14'-1" 6'-6" 15'-11" 32'-7" 7'-11" 77' 19'-5" 12'-3" 20'-4" 15'-11" 6'-6" 14'-1" 88'-6" 2'-10" 22'-8"
11'
W 6'-11"
25'-6"

MAIN FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
DESCRIPTION AREA (SQ.FT)
C 135.60
D 131.10
E 40.78
F 381.10
G 129.13
H 77.08
I 312.26
J-STAIRS 94.44
K 176.25
L 89.23
ELEVATOR 41.41
TOTAL LIVING AREA 1608.38
A 222.46
B 446.36
GARAGE AREA (A+B) 668.82
W (MECH & STORAGE) 126.17
ENTRY 37.64
BALCONY 1 185.25
BALCONY 2 72.17

LOWER FLOOR AREA CALCULATION
DESCRIPTION AREA (SQ.FT)
P 94.50
Q 65.13
R 532.64
S 395.29
T 165.73
U 318.84
TOTAL LIVING AREA 1572.13
V (CRAWL SPACE) 490.62
BALCONY 3 558.01
BALCONY 4 88.86

DOOR SCHEDULE

NUMBER QTY WIDTH HEIGHT TYPE DESCRIPTION
D01 1 9'-0" 7'-0" GARAGE DOOR - D02 1 16'-0" 7'-0" GARAGE DOOR - D03 3 3'-0" 6'-8" HINGED - D04 9 2'-6" 6'-8" POCKET - D05 2 2'-4" 6'-8" POCKET - D06 6 6'-0" 7'-0" DOUBLE HINGED MARVIN ULTIMATE SWINGING ARCH TOP FRENCH DOOR D07
D08
D09 1 7'-0" 7'-0" FOLDING STACKING GLASS WALLS
D10 - D11 1 2'-6" 6'-8" HINGED - D12 2 2'-6" 6'-8" HINGED ELEVATOR D13 1 5'-0" 6'-8" DOUBLE HINGED - D14 1 4'-0" 6'-8" SLIDING - D15 1 4'-6" 6'-8" SLIDING - D16 2 2'-6" 6'-8" HINGED - 1 4'-0" 6'-8" SLIDING
1 11'-0" 7'-0" FOLDING STACKING GLASS WALLS
1 2'-6" 6'-8" POCKET SOLID CORE

WINDOWS SCHEDULE

NUMBER QTY WIDTH HEIGHT TYPE DESCRIPTION
W01 3 6'-0" 3'-6" SLIDING W/ SHUTTER
W02 2 1'-0" 2'-0" FIX
W03 1 2'-0" 5'-6" FIX
W04 1 6'-0" 3'-6" SLIDING
W05 1 3'-0" 3'-0" SLIDING
W06 1 8'-6" 3'-0" SLIDING
W07 1 4'-0" 4'-0" SLIDING
W08 1 8'-6" 4'-0" SLIDING
W09 1 6'-0" 9'-0" FIX
W10 1 6'-0" 4'-0" FIX
W11 3 5'-0" 4'-6" FIX
W12 2 4'-0" SLIDING W / SHUTTER
W13 1 4'-0" 2'-0" SLIDING
W14 2 3'-0" 4'-0" SLIDING
W15 1 5'-0" 4'-0" FIX
W16 1 4'-0" 4'-0" FIX
W17 1 8'-6" 4'-0" FIX - W18 2 4'-0" SLIDING W / SHUTTER W19 1 4'-0" 1'-6" SLIDING
W20 1 6'-0" 3'-6" SLIDING
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 3'-0"
3'-0"
W21 2 4'-0" 6'-6" FIX -
· AREA CALCULATION
· WINDOW & DOOR SCHEDULE
A-6.1
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:BENDA -SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

9.a
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) NORTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 1
1 1
1 6
3 3
3 1
4 4
4 2
2 3
4 5
5 5
9 2
2 2 14 14 14 14 14 12
5 10 10
4 4 4.1
3 4 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 MAIN FLOOR 2 983.00 TOP OF ROOF 1 997.58 TOP OF PLATE 1 993.00 TOP OF CHIMNEY 1001.16 2'-7" 2' 8' 4'-7" 3'-7"
20'-8" GARAGE FLOOR 986.50 TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 2 999.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 2 994.50 TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 1 997.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 1 994.00 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 MAIN FLOOR 2 983.00 LOWER FLOOR 2 973.00 LOWER FLOOR 975.00 5'-6" 2' 1'-6" 7'-6" 6" 3'-4" 2'
22'-4" (N) ROOF EAGLE ROOFING TILE CAPISTRANO-3526 VALENCIA HUES OF RED ORANGE, BROWN STREAKS (N) WINDOWS WOOD WINDOW MILGARD WINDOW INTEGRITY ALL ULTREX GLIDER COLOR: BRONZE (EXTERIOR FINISH) (N) MOULDING STUCCO SHASTA WHITE LRV55 BASE A (N) EXTERIOR WALLS (N) GARAGE DOOR ZIEGLER DOOR SPANISH OLD WORLD WOOD GARAGE DOORS ELEVATION LEGEND (N)DECK DOOR MILGARD DOOR PATIO DOOR STACKING GLASS WALLS IN ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD GLASS: LOW E2 TEMPERED COLOR: DARK(EXTERIOR SHASTA WHITE LRV55 FINISH) BASE A 7/8" STUCCO 3 COAT APPLICATION WITH WOOD OVER TWO LAYERS OF GRADE D BUILDING PAPER. PROVIDE 3 1/2" WEEP SCREED AT A MINIMUM OF 4' ABOVE EARTH OR 2" ABOVE PAVED AREAS. GARAGE DOOR VENTS 2 - 4"X6" COMBUSTION AIR OPENING AT THE BOTTOM SECTION OF THE GARAGE DOOR. (N) ORNAMENTAL IRON MILL CITY IRON ORNAMENTAL WALL DECORATIVE ACCENT (N) CORBELS EKENA MILLWORK 7-1/2 IN. X 14 IN. X 30 IN. NEW BRIGHTON SMOOTH WESTERN CORBEL WITH BACKPLATE (N) ROSETTE EKENA MILLWORK 6-7/8 IN. X 1 IN. X 6-7/8 IN. WOOD ALDER MEDIUM KENT FLORAL ROSETTE (N) ENTRY DOORS KNOTTY ALDER MEADOWLANDS 6 LITE SINGLE DOOR/ROUND TOP, 2-1/4 THICK GLASS OPTIONS: CLEAR LOW E OR FLEMISH LOW E DOOR: 3'6" X 8'0" X 2-1/4" (N) SHUTTERS WOOD (N)DECK DOOR MARVIN ULTIMATE DOOR PATIO DOOR MARVIN ULTIMATE SWINGING ARCH TOP FRENCH DOOR 1 2
3 4 4.1
5 6
78 910 1112 (N) BARBECUE JAMAICA PREMIER STONE BARBECUE 13 (N) EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SKU: 7311-1 7311-1 SPANISH STYLE BELL WALL LAMP LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE 1415 (N) PV PANELS 16 ILLUMINATED NUMBERS AT FRONT 4 12 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 3
4 4.1
5 7 15 15 15 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 MAIN FLOOR 2 983.00 LOWER FLOOR 2 973.00 LOWER FLOOR 975.00 TOP OF PLATE 2 997.00 TOP OF ROOF 2 1000.25 TOP OF ROOF 4 1001.16 TOP OF ROOF 1 997.58 TOP OF PLATE 1 993.00 TOP OF CHIMNEY 1001.16 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 2 994.50 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 LOWER FLOOR 975.00 5' 2' 8' 2' 8' 4'-7" 3'-7"
33'-2"
1'-7" 6'-10" 10' 1'-6" 8' 2'-6" 4'-2"
34'-6"
3 4.1
4 12 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14
7 7
7 2
2 3
3 3
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 4:12 4:12
4 12
5 5
5 2 958.00 955.00 955.00 SOUTHWEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 7311-1 SPANISH STYLE BELL WALL LAMP LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE A-7 · ELEVATIONS J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 4 12 1
1 1
2 2
2 3
3 4
4 3
4 NORTHWEST ELEVATIONSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
℄ GARAGE FLOOR 986.50
1 4
4 4
4 4
3 3
3 2
2 215 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 MAIN FLOOR 2 983.00 LOWER FLOOR 2 973.00 LOWER FLOOR 975.00 5'-1" 2' 8' 2' 12' 4'-2"
33'-3" TOP OF PLATE 2 997.00 TOP OF ROOF 4 1001.16 TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 2 999.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 2 994.50 TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 1 997.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 1 994.00 1'-9" 7'-6" 6" 3'-4" 2'
15'-1" 12
6 4.1
3 4.1
5 4.1 962.00958.00 968.00 955.00
PROPERTY LINE 17'-3" (N) ROOF EAGLE ROOFING TILE CAPISTRANO-3526 VALENCIA HUES OF RED ORANGE, BROWN STREAKS (N) WINDOWS WOOD WINDOW MILGARD WINDOW INTEGRITY ALL ULTREX GLIDER COLOR: BRONZE (EXTERIOR FINISH) (N) MOULDING STUCCO SHASTA WHITE LRV55 BASE A (N) EXTERIOR WALLS (N) GARAGE DOOR ZIEGLER DOOR SPANISH OLD WORLD WOOD GARAGE DOORS ELEVATION LEGEND (N)DECK DOOR MILGARD DOOR PATIO DOOR STACKING GLASS WALLS IN ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD GLASS: LOW E2 TEMPERED COLOR: DARK(EXTERIOR SHASTA WHITE LRV55 FINISH) BASE A 7/8" STUCCO 3 COAT APPLICATION WITH WOOD OVER TWO LAYERS OF GRADE D BUILDING PAPER. PROVIDE 3 1/2" WEEP SCREED AT A MINIMUM OF 4' ABOVE EARTH OR 2" ABOVE PAVED AREAS. GARAGE DOOR VENTS 2 - 4"X6" COMBUSTION AIR OPENING AT THE BOTTOM SECTION OF THE GARAGE DOOR. (N) ORNAMENTAL IRON MILL CITY IRON ORNAMENTAL WALL DECORATIVE ACCENT (N) CORBELS EKENA MILLWORK 7-1/2 IN. X 14 IN. X 30 IN. NEW BRIGHTON SMOOTH WESTERN CORBEL WITH BACKPLATE (N) ROSETTE EKENA MILLWORK 6-7/8 IN. X 1 IN. X 6-7/8 IN. WOOD ALDER MEDIUM KENT FLORAL ROSETTE (N) ENTRY DOORS KNOTTY ALDER MEADOWLANDS 6 LITE SINGLE DOOR/ROUND TOP, 2-1/4 THICK GLASS OPTIONS: CLEAR LOW E OR FLEMISH LOW E DOOR: 3'6" X 8'0" X 2-1/4" (N) SHUTTERS WOOD (N)DECK DOOR MARVIN ULTIMATE DOOR PATIO DOOR MARVIN ULTIMATE SWINGING ARCH TOP FRENCH DOOR 1 2
34 4.1
5 6
78 910 1112 (N) BARBECUE JAMAICA PREMIER STONE BARBECUE 13 (N) EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SKU: 7311-1 7311-1 SPANISH STYLE BELL WALL LAMP LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE 1415 (N) PV PANELS 16 ILLUMINATED NUMBERS AT FRONT EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 7311-1 SPANISH STYLE BELL WALL LAMP LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE A-8 · ELEVATIONS J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) ℄ 4 12 1 3 4 4.1 SOUTHEAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 1 1 1 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 4 12 14 14 14 14 4 3 12 123 4 4 5 5 5 4 3 4 3 4 10 10 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 MAIN FLOOR 2 983.00 LOWER FLOOR 2 973.00 LOWER FLOOR 975.00 TOP OF CHIMNEY 1001.16 5' 2' 8' 2' 8' 4' TOP OF PLATE 2 997.00 TOP OF ROOF 1 997.58 TOP OF PLATE 1 993.003'-7" 7" TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 1 997.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 1 994.00 5'-3" 3'-10"
9'-1" 2 2 2 2 2 2 ℄ 962.00 958.00 966.00 961.20 966.00 968.00 964.00 962.00 33'-2" 953.00
2' 3'-11"

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE 17'-3" (N) ROOF EAGLE ROOFING TILE CAPISTRANO-3526 VALENCIA HUES OF RED ORANGE, BROWN STREAKS (N) WINDOWS WOOD WINDOW MILGARD WINDOW INTEGRITY ALL ULTREX GLIDER COLOR: BRONZE (EXTERIOR FINISH) (N) MOULDING STUCCO SHASTA WHITE LRV55 BASE A (N) EXTERIOR WALLS (N) GARAGE DOOR ZIEGLER DOOR SPANISH OLD WORLD WOOD GARAGE DOORS ELEVATION LEGEND (N)DECK DOOR MILGARD DOOR PATIO DOOR STACKING GLASS WALLS IN ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD GLASS: LOW E2 TEMPERED COLOR: DARK(EXTERIOR SHASTA WHITE LRV55 FINISH) BASE A 7/8" STUCCO 3 COAT APPLICATION WITH WOOD OVER TWO LAYERS OF GRADE D BUILDING PAPER. PROVIDE 3 1/2" WEEP SCREED AT A MINIMUM OF 4' ABOVE EARTH OR 2" ABOVE PAVED AREAS. GARAGE DOOR VENTS 2 - 4"X6" COMBUSTION AIR OPENING AT THE BOTTOM SECTION OF THE GARAGE DOOR. (N) ORNAMENTAL IRON MILL CITY IRON ORNAMENTAL WALL DECORATIVE ACCENT (N) CORBELS EKENA MILLWORK 7-1/2 IN. X 14 IN. X 30 IN. NEW BRIGHTON SMOOTH WESTERN CORBEL WITH BACKPLATE (N) ROSETTE EKENA MILLWORK 6-7/8 IN. X 1 IN. X 6-7/8 IN. WOOD ALDER MEDIUM KENT FLORAL ROSETTE (N) ENTRY DOORS KNOTTY ALDER MEADOWLANDS 6 LITE SINGLE DOOR/ROUND TOP, 2-1/4 THICK GLASS OPTIONS: CLEAR LOW E OR FLEMISH LOW E DOOR: 3'6" X 8'0" X 2-1/4" (N) SHUTTERS WOOD (N)DECK DOOR MARVIN ULTIMATE DOOR PATIO DOOR MARVIN ULTIMATE SWINGING ARCH TOP FRENCH DOOR 12 34 4.156 78 910 1112 (N) BARBECUE JAMAICA PREMIER STONE BARBECUE 13 (N) EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE SKU: 7311-1 7311-1 SPANISH STYLE BELL WALL LAMP LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE 1415 (N) PV PANELS 16 ILLUMINATED NUMBERS AT FRONT EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE 7311-1 SPANISH STYLE BELL WALL LAMP LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE A-8.1 · ELEVATIONS J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26 JAV IER M. CHAVAR IA REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINEER C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 3' 1'-6" 9.a
Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE 26'-8" 34'-5" NORTHEAST ELEVATION 4:12 4:12 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE 38'-11" 30'-9" SOUTHWEST ELEVATION A-8.2
· ELEVATIONS ENLARGED VIEW J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 388
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) ℄ SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"
5'-3" 3'-10"
9'-1"

PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE 17'-3" SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONSCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ℄
PROPERTY LINE 17'-3"
PROPERTY LINE 41'-11" NORTHWEST ELEVATION A-8.3
· ELEVATIONS ENLARGED VIEW J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A Sheet: DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 389
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) ATTIC SPACE LOWER FLOOR 975.00 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 TOP OF PLATE 2 997.00 TOP OF ROOF 2 1000.25 TOP OF ROOF 4 1001.08 3'-3" 10"
32'-9"
9' CL
12' CL PLAY ROOM GREAT ROOM CRAWL SPACESECTION A-A SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING GRADE 7'-7"
4 12
4 12
℄ STATION 0+18.31 ELEV: 989.85 TW:1000.60 BW:990.35 TW:1007.9 BW:1000.0 958.00 12' 10' 6'-5"
2 1 CRAWL SPACE FILL AREA CUT AREA 6'-2" 26'-8" TO PROPERTY LINE A-9 · SECTION A J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Sheet: Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 390
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) PLATFORM FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SECTION B-B SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ATTIC SPACE CRAWL SPACE MAIN FLOOR 986.50 TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 2 999.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 2 994.50 GARAGE 2'-1" 3'-4"
25'-2" FIRE TRUCK TURN AROUND DRIVEWAY SLOPE 9.0% STREET SLOPE SLOPE 2.00% ℄ (E) GRADE 12' DRIVEWAY CUT AREA FILL AREA CUT AREA
1'-8"
2 1
8'
4 12
4 12
8' CL
7'-6"
4 12 TOP OF ROOF GARAGE 1 997.83 TOP OF PLATE GARAGE 1 994.00 6"
2' 72'-4" TO PROPERTY LINE A-10
· SECTION B J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Sheet: Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) MASTER BEDROOM CRAWL SPACE CLOSET BATH ATTIC SPACE SECTION C-C SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" F.FLOOR 983.00 TOP OF ROOF 1 997.58 TOP OF PLATE 1 993.00 LOWER FLOOR TOP OF CHIMNEY 1001.16 TOP OF ROOF 2 1000.25 973.00 4'-7" 3'-7" 5'-3" 10' 10'
35'
9' CL ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 8'-11" 3'-11" FILL AREA CUT AREA 989.00 10' CL
4 12
4 12
℄ GUEST ROOM
PROPERTY LINE 15'-9" A-11
· SECTION C J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Sheet: Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) ATTIC SPACE LOWER FLOOR 975.00 MAIN FLOOR 985.00 TOP OF PLATE 2 997.00 TOP OF ROOF 2 1000.25 4'-2"
33'-9"
9' CL GREAT ROOM CRAWL SPACE SECTION D-D SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 7'-7"
4 12
4 12 958.00
12' 10' 6'-5"
2 1 CRAWL SPACE FILL AREA CUT AREA 6'-2" GAS FIREPLACE
12' CL HALLWAY BEDROOM 1 TOP OF CHIMNEY 1001.16
10' CL ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT 989.00
9' CL
℄ ENTRY
8'-6" CL
PROPERTY LINE 22'-6" A-12
· SECTION D J C ENGINEERING 848 BURNS CT. PACIFICA, CA 94044 (650) 355 0615 FAX (650) 355 8965 CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS REMARKS:

BENDA -SPENKER

RESIDENCE

BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE
PACIFICA, CA 94044
APN: 022-062-550 Sheet: Checked by: Drawn by: JC project no sheet no. 20180525 06 / 30 / 26

JAV IER
M. CHAVAR IA

REGISTERED
PROF
E
S

S IONAL

ENGINEER

C I V I L
STAT E
OF
CA
L I FORN I A DATE ISSUED FOR 12/03/18 PLANING SET 05/23/19 PLANING SET 03/23/2021 PLANING SET 04/21/2021 PLANING SET 09/10/2021 PLANING SET 09/24/2021 PLANING SET 06/22/2022 PLANING SET 02/17/2023 PLANING SET 05/23/2023 PLANING SET 10/16/2023 PLANING SET 10/21/2024 PLANING SET 9.a Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) G
G

10.1 J
J
D15
D16
D17
W16 W15
W12 W13
W17

GUEST HOUSE FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
11'-11" 6'-2" 12'-6" 12' 13'-9"
BATH
8'-0"x4'-6"
CLOSET
4'-7"x2'-0"
CLOSET
5'-8"x2'-0"

KITCHEN
14'-4"x13'-3"

BEDROOM
11'-5"x11'-0"

BEDROOM
11'-6"x11'-0"
BATH
5'-8"x5'-0"
989.00
989.00 989.00

ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNIT
A-13.1
F F
I
I
9 9
6 6 W14 D04
D04
D15 D15
D15 D04
D21
30'-7" 25'-9" 11'-6" 25'-9"
8'-6" 15'-4" 6'-9"
30'-7" 2'-6" 4'-6" 5'-6" 1'-9"

10.1 A-13.1
A-13.1
E
E
A-13.1

RIGHT ELEVATION

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION

DWELLING UNIT DOOR SCHEDULE

NUMBER QTY WIDTH HEIGHT TYPE DESCRIPTION
D04 3 2'-6" 6'-8" POCKET - D15 4 2'-6" 6'-8" HINGED - D16 1 4'-0" 6'-8" SLIDING - D17 1 5'-0" 6'-8" SLIDING - D21 1 6'-0" 6'-8" SLIDING - DWELLING UNIT WINDOW SCHEDULE

NUMBER QTY WIDTH HEIGHT TYPE DESCRIPTION
W12 1 6'-0" 4'-0" SLIDING
W13 1 4'-0" 2'-6" SLIDING
W14 1 6'-0" 4'-0" SLIDING
W15 1 6'-0" 3'-0" SLIDING
W16 1 4'-0" 3'-6" SLIDING
W17 1 4'-0" 2'-6" SLIDING
-
-
-
-
-
- GUEST HOUSE UNIT AREA CALCULATION
SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0"
30'-7" 12' 13'-9" 25'-9"
M
N 12' O 12'
8'-6" 15'-4" 6'-9"
30'-7" 1'-9" 25'-9"

GUEST HOUSE AREA CALCULATION
DESCRIPTION AREA (SQ.FT)
M 102.04
N 210.81
O 366.91
TOTAL LIVING AREA 679.76
TOP OF ROOF 2
1000.17'
TOP OF ROOF 3
1001.67

FINISH FLOOR
989.00'

TOP OF PLATE
997.00' 8' 3'-2" 1'-5" 12'-8"
TOP OF ROOF 3
1001.67

TOP OF PLATE
997.00'

FINISH FLOOR
989.00' 8'
TOP OF ROOF 1
999.75' 2'-9" 1'-11" 12'-8"

NORTHEAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
1 4
2 4.1
3 9

4.1 3
4 2
5 4
12 4
12 4:12
5 4
12 4
12 TOP OF ROOF 2 4:12
1000.17'

TOP OF ROOF
1001.67

FINISH FLOOR
989.00'

TOP OF PLATE
997.00' 4'-10" 8' 3'-2" 1'-5"

SOUTHWEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 17'-6"
1 5 1
2 2
TOP OF ROOF 3
1001.67

TOP OF PLATE
997.00'

FINISH FLOOR
989.00' 8'
TOP OF ROOF 1
999.75' 2'-9" 1'-11" 12'-8"
4 12
4 12
4:12
4:12

SOUTHEAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
4 4

4.1 4.1
2 3
3 1
6 9
5 TOP OF ROOF 3
1001.67

TOP OF PLATE
997.00'

FINISH FLOOR
989.00' 8'
TOP OF ROOF 1
999.75' 2'-9" 1'-11" 12'-8"
TOP OF ROOF 2
1000.17'

TOP OF ROOF
1001.67

FINISH FLOOR
989.00'

TOP OF PLATE
997.00' 6'-10" 8' 3'-2" 1'-5"
4 12
4 12
4 12
4:12

NORTHWEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 19'-5"
5 5
1 1
4 4
9 3
3 4.1
2 2
2 8
(N) ROOF

EAGLE ROOFING TILE
CAPISTRANO-3526 VALENCIA

HUES OF RED ORANGE,

BROWN STREAKS
(N) WINDOWS

WOOD WINDOW

MILGARD WINDOW

INTEGRITY ALL ULTREX
GLIDER
COLOR: BRONZE (EXTERIOR

FINISH)
(N) MOULDING
STUCCO
SHASTA WHITE LRV55
BASE A
(N) EXTERIOR WALLS

ELEVATION LEGEND
(N)EXTERIOR DOOR

MILGARD DOOR

PATIO DOOR

STACKING GLASS WALLS IN

ALUMINUM CLAD WOOD
GLASS: LOW E2 TEMPERED
COLOR: DARK(EXTERIOR

FINISH)
SHASTA WHITE LRV55
BASE A 7/8" STUCCO 3 COAT

APPLICATION WITH WOOD

OVER TWO LAYERS OF GRADE
D BUILDING PAPER. PROVIDE 3
1/2" WEEP SCREED AT A
MINIMUM OF 4' ABOVE EARTH
OR 2" ABOVE PAVED AREAS.
(N) CORBELS

EKENA MILLWORK
7-1/2 IN. X 14 IN. X 30 IN.

NEW BRIGHTON SMOOTH

WESTERN CORBEL WITH

BACKPLATE
(N) SHUTTERS
WOOD
1 2
3 4

4.1 5
6 9 (N) EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
SKU: 7311-1
7311-1 SPANISH STYLE

BELL WALL LAMP
LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE
(N) DOOR

MILGARD DOOR

MODERN WOODEN DOOR
8 EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
7311-1 SPANISH STYLE

BELL WALL LAMP
LAMPING-1*60-WATT MEDIUM BASE
· (P) GUEST HOUSE FLOOR PLAN
· (P) GUEST HOUSE ELEVATIONS
· (P) GUEST HOUSE AREA

CALCULATION
· (P) GUEST HOUSE SECTION E
A-13
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:BENDA -SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26
JAV IER M. CHAVAR
IA

REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE
R

C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/22/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
NORTH

9.a
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) 8' CL

ATTIC SPACE

CRAWL SPACE

BEDROOM

SECTION F
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"

FILL AREA

CUT AREA
989.00
TOP OF ROOF 3
1001.67

TOP OF PLATE
997.00

FINISH FLOOR
989.00 8' 2'-9" 12'-8"
BEDROOM CLOSET 8' CL
TOP OF ROOF 1
999.75 1'-11"

CRAWL SPACE

ATTIC SPACE
TOP OF ROOF 2
1000.17'
TOP OF ROOF 3
1001.67

FINISH FLOOR
989.00'

TOP OF PLATE
997.00' 8' 3'-2" 1'-5" 12'-8"

SECTION E
SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 8' CL CLOSET

BATH BEDROOM

KITCHEN PROPERTY LINE(E) ADJACENT
HOUSE
LOT 16
(E) KEYSTONE
RET. WALL
(N) RET. WALL

UPPER FLOOR
WINDOW

LOWER FLOOR
SLIDING DOOR · (P) GUEST HOUSE - SECTION E · (P) GUEST HOUSE - SECTION F A-13.1
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS:BENDA -SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26 JAV IER M. CHAVAR IA REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE R C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/22/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET
(E) ADJACENT HOUSE

9.a
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550) · RENDER VIEWS
A-14
J C

ENGINEERING
848 BURNS CT.

PACIFICA, CA 94044
(650) 355 0615
FAX (650) 355 8965

CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
REMARKS: BENDA-SPENKER RESIDENCE BAY VIEW RD- CALERA TERRACE PACIFICA, CA 94044 APN: 022-062-550 Sheet:

Checked by:

Drawn by:

JC
project no sheet no.
20180525
06 / 30 / 26 JAV IER M. CHAVAR IA REGISTERED PROFESS IONAL ENGINE R C I V I L STAT E OF CA L I FORN I A

DATE ISSUED FOR
12/03/18 PLANING SET
05/23/19 PLANING SET
03/23/2021 PLANING SET
04/21/2021 PLANING SET
09/10/2021 PLANING SET
09/24/2021 PLANING SET
06/22/2022 PLANING SET
02/17/2023 PLANING SET
05/23/2023 PLANING SET
10/16/2023 PLANING SET
10/21/2024 PLANING SET

BAYVIEW RD EXISTING VIEW

BAYVIEW RD PROPOSED VIEW

ROCKAWAY EXISTING VIEW

ROCKAWAY PROPOSED VIEW

ENTRY FROM BAYVIEW RD EXISTING VIEW

ENTRY FROM BAYVIEW RD PROPOSED VIEW

9.a
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment B - Project Plans dated 10-21-2024 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-4-24 at APN 022-062-550)

9.b
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.b
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment C - Revised Renderings Following 02-23-26 City Council Meeting (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-

9.c
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

9.c
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment D - Appeal Letter Dated December 11, 2025 (6180 : Appeal of Site Development Permit PSD-838-18 and Tree Permit TP-

CITY OF PACIFICA

COUNCIL AGENDA SUMMARY REPORT
4/13/2026
1 SUBJECT:

Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Planning Process, Timeline and Preliminary Budget Strategies (1 hr)
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept the report and provide additional policy direction for the preparation of the FY 2026-27 Budget.

STAFF CONTACT:

Yulia Carter, Interim City Manager
650-501-6004
[email protected]
Marisol Gomez, Finance and Administrative Services Director [email protected]
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

Each year, the City of Pacifica adopts an annual operating budget that reflects the planned activities for the next fiscal year based on the best information available to the City Council and staff at the time of adoption. This narrative report is the first step in the new budget development process. It is not yet intended to provide detailed budgetary information for FY 2026-27, but rather describe the process, timeline, and receive early input from the City Council on several preliminary budget strategies recommended by the City Manager.

The budget process will continue with a detailed Base Budget presentation, followed by Budget study sessions, Council adoption of the updated strategic plan priorities, and will conclude with the public hearing and budget adoption. Again, this report provides the Council with a general outline of the budget development process, including the timeline, methodology, and preliminary budget strategies for the upcoming year.

The City Council held study sessions on November 10, 2025 and November 24, 2025 to review Pacifica’s long-term financial sustainability challenges and to explore potential revenue generation strategies to address structural budget deficits, limited staffing capacity, and significant unfunded capital needs. The purpose of these meetings was to establish a shared understanding of the City’s fiscal baseline, identify structural gaps between revenues and service demands, and evaluate a range of tools to secure and diversify the City’s revenue base and strengthen long-term fiscal health.

Consistent with the City’s multi-layered Fiscal Sustainability Framework, the discussion focused on a comprehensive set of five interconnected strategies (short and long-term), including strengthening and diversifying revenue streams, maintaining appropriate organizational 10 Packet Pg. 429
Pacifica City Council 2
April 13, 2026
investments and staffing capacity, advancing economic development to revitalize commercial areas and opportunity sites, recognizing housing development as an economic driver, and leveraging community partnerships, grants, and financing tools to supplement local resources.

As a result of this study session, the City Council provided direction to the City Manager to further assess the feasibility of placing revenue measures on a future ballot, including a potential public safety parcel tax and an infrastructure funding measure, and to engage professional services to support community outreach, education, and polling efforts to better inform future policy decisions. The survey results have since been released on the City’s website and shared through the City’s community newsletter. The City appreciates the community members who took the time to participate and share their perspectives. This input is an important part of the City’s ongoing engagement efforts. As we move into this year’s budget process, the City will continue to keep the community informed and involved as discussions about long-term fiscal sustainability and potential funding options move forward.

Budget Calendar
The annual budget cycle begins each year with the development of budget instructions, including policy directives and a budget calendar in January-February, and is completed with the budget adoption by the City Council in June of each year. A summary of the tentative FY 2026-27 budget schedule is as follows:

This year's budget cycle launched on March 7, 2026, with the Council’s review of the City’s Strategic Plan and Priority-Setting workshop. The Strategic Plan and priorities update will be presented for the Council’s adoption on May 11, 2026 in a separate agenda item. On March 9, 2026, the Council completed a mid-year review of the FY 2025-26 Budget. At that time, the Council reviewed revenues and expenditures and made adjustments that will be factored into the development of the FY 2026-27 Base Budget, scheduled to be presented to the Council on May 11, 2026.

Budget Methodology
The Adopted Budget is achieved after an inclusive and interactive budget development process, which aims to reach a balanced and sustainable budget. Three years ago, staff modified the City's budget process to apply a modified zero-based budget methodology, a systematic 10 Packet Pg. 430
Pacifica City Council 3
April 13, 2026
financial management strategy commonly used by local governments to help achieve more cost-effective delivery of public services. The upcoming FY 2026-27 budget development process will follow the same methodology.

The purpose of the Base Budget is to reflect the current level of services and operations. The Base Budget is not an exact duplication of the prior year's Adopted Budget because of actions that the Council may have taken that modified the budget over the course of the year as well as updated assumptions made at mid-year budget review. The Base Budget and updated assumptions will be presented to the City Council at the 2nd Budget Study Session on May 11th.

The Base Budget will reflect the current economic conditions at the existing service level. Once the Base Budget is developed, each department will be asked to submit prioritized program changes for service enhancements and reductions, and to identify any necessary or desirable service increase or reduction options to maintain a balanced and sustainable budget.

The City Manager will then review department requests and formulate budget recommendations for service-level changes for the Council's consideration. These recommendations will be based on many factors, including long-term fiscal sustainability and existing fiscal constraints, the Council's strategic vision and priorities, staffing capacity, and potential impact on overall City operations and services provided to the Community.

The final proposed budget document will incorporate the City Manager’s final recommendations based on the City Council's priorities and input. Throughout the upcoming budget meetings, the Council will have an opportunity to review and consider budget options and provide direction to the City Manager regarding any changes.

The City's goal is to achieve a balanced budget with operating revenue equal to or greater than operating expenditures, including debt obligations and any reimbursements from other funds for services. Under this policy, total expenditures can exceed revenue in a given year to fund capital improvement plan projects or other "one-time" non-recurring expenditures. The City's financial position and the resources in each fund will determine the level of services and the projects that the City will be able to deliver to the community in the upcoming fiscal year.

Therefore, these services and projects will be included in the Adopted Budget.

FY 2026-27 Preliminary Long-Term Financial Forecast
The City’s Long-Term Financial Forecast (LTFF) was most recently presented to the City Council on March 7, 2026, as part of the Strategic Planning Study Session and is based on the FY 2025-26 mid-year review. At that time, the LTFF indicated that the City of Pacifica was facing an ongoing structural deficit at the current level of services, projected at $3.4 million for the upcoming FY 2026-27. If this deficit remains unaddressed, the forecast shows that the City’s reserves could fall below the GFOA-recommended two months of operating expenditures reserves as early as FY 2027-28, with full depletion of reserves projected by FY 2031-32.

While a more detailed discussion of revenue assumptions will be provided at the upcoming budget study session, the preliminary forecast already reflects several key pressures impacting the City’s financial outlook. These include softening Sales Tax and Cannabis revenues, which are expected to continue in the future years, reductions in Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), Business License and Permit Fees due to the amendments to the Short-Term Rental (STR) Ordinance, and the Vehicle License Shortfall and uncertainty around the VLF backfill in the upcoming years. While the forecast includes the $1.06 million VLF backfill that is due to the City in FY 2026-27, this amount is currently not included in the State’s budget. 10 Packet Pg. 431
Pacifica City Council 4
April 13, 2026
The preliminary forecast represented a “status quo” scenario and did not assume ongoing General Fund contributions to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Even with no additional CIP funding, the General Fund is projected to remain structurally imbalanced, underscoring the magnitude of the City’s fiscal challenges.

It is important to note that this preliminary forecast does not incorporate potential future actions, including revenue measures, service level adjustments, or other policy decisions that the Council may consider as part of the FY 2026-27 Proposed Budget and beyond.

Finance staff are currently working on developing the Base Budget for the FY 2026-27 and once all assumptions are built in, the LTFF will be refined and updated throughout the FY 2026- 27 budget development process to reflect updated assumptions, Council direction, and any adopted strategies to address the structural imbalance.

FY 2026-27 Preliminary Budget Strategies
The comprehensive update to the Strategic Plan and Priorities is scheduled for presentation and adoption by the Council on April 13, 2026. However, the overarching City goals remained unchanged from the City Council’s March 7th Strategic Planning workshop. During the workshop, the City Council confirmed the following five Pacifica goals for the next five years:

1. Enhance organizational and fiscal stability.

2. Improve and steward City infrastructure, streets, and facilities.

3. Prioritize protection and development of affordable housing.

4. Pursue climate change adaptation and mitigation.

5. Broaden public communications and collaboration.

The Council's input on the following recommended preliminary budget strategies related to these goals will help guide the development of budget recommendations for FY 2026-27 that support the Council's Strategic Plan Goals and Strategies and continue providing high-quality City services to the Pacifica community.

Strategy #1: Keep Full Allocation of Excess Educational Revenue Augmentation Funding (Excess ERAF) revenue in the General Fund. (Supports Goal #1).

Excess ERAF has been traditionally treated as a one-time, unreliable revenue source due to unpredictability and dependence on complex property tax calculations by the State. As a result, the City has historically allocated these revenues to special purposes outside of the General Fund, with 50/50% allocation between the Disaster Accounting Fund (fund 238) and Housing Action Fund (Fund 224).

However, the Council changed this policy direction in FY 2025-26, by retaining the Excess ERAF revenue in the General Fund to be able to balance the budget and maintain essential services. Although Excess ERAF is not considered a stable, ongoing revenue source, Pacifica has consistently received these funds over the past decade. Additionally, staff surveyed other San Mateo County cities and found that many municipalities routinely budget Excess ERAF directly in their General Funds to support core services.

While this approach offers critical financial relief, it also presents longer-term risks:
• Disaster Preparedness: Although the Disaster Accounting Fund (Fund 238) currently has ample reserves ($9.9 million), permanently reallocating these funds may leave the City less prepared to respond to emergencies in the long term. As a coastal community 10 Packet Pg. 432
Pacifica City Council 5
April 13, 2026
vulnerable to annual flooding, winter storms, and infrastructure failures, maintaining an adequate dedicated reserve for disaster response is a prudent and fiscally responsible practice.
• Affordable Housing Development: Redirecting funds from the Housing Action Fund (Fund 224) would further limit the City's ability to make progress on affordable housing initiatives, which is one of the City’s key strategic goals. These funds help meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) obligations and support local housing strategies aligned with the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) and General Plan. Notably, Excess ERAF represents the only dedicated revenue source for the Housing Action Fund in the City’s budget, and even at current levels, it is insufficient to advance significant housing projects.

Continuation of this proposed strategy reflects the need for near-term fiscal flexibility and responsible stewardship of available resources. Should the City’s fiscal outlook improve or an alternative revenue source be identified, the Council may consider returning to the prior allocation model, to continue funding long-term community resiliency and housing priorities.

Staff will continue to monitor revenue projections and may bring forward an updated recommendation during the future budget session.

Strategy #2: Addressing Financial Uncertainties Related to Vehicle License Fee In-Lieu Backfill Payments from the State (Supports Goal #1).

The uncertainty surrounding Vehicle License Fee (VLF) In-Lieu payments from the State has been a recurring fiscal concern over the last several years. Despite the City's continued reliance on these revenues and budgeting for that, the State’s continuing threat to fulfilling its obligations have made long-term financial planning increasingly difficult.

In FY 2025-26, the City anticipated a $2.3 million backfill under the State’s established two-year delay in disbursing these funds. However, the State only delivered 2/3 of the payment, and the City did not receive $771k due that year. Since the Council adopted this budget strategy last year, the City was able to backfill the under-funded portion from reserves in order to avoid reducing services in the short-term. The City subsequently joined a lawsuit against the State for the remaining funds.

Unfortunately, the same concerns have emerged again, as the State is not planning to repay its backfill obligation to cities in 2026-27. The VLF backfill repayment is not currently reflected in the State’s draft budget, creating a risk that the City may not receive these funds.

The San Mateo County Mayors, City Managers, and Finance Officers have coordinated a unified regional advocacy effort to address this issue. Through this collaboration, San Mateo County and its cities have engaged in direct outreach to State leadership, submitted formal budget requests, and provided clear, quantifiable examples of how the loss of VLF revenues would affect local communities. These efforts emphasize that VLF In-Lieu payments are not discretionary funding, but rather a legally required backfill intended to support core municipal services.

For the City of Pacifica, the potential loss of approximately $1.06 million in VLF revenue would have meaningful operational impacts. This funding is equivalent to multiple full-time staff positions and could result in reduced capacity in public safety and public works services, deferred infrastructure maintenance, and scaled-back community programs. As outlined in the City’s advocacy materials, these impacts represent the level of service reductions that could be required if the State does not fulfill its obligation.
10 Packet Pg. 433
Pacifica City Council 6
April 13, 2026
To proactively mitigate this risk, the City Manager recommends continue designating a portion of the General Fund reserves as assigned fund balance to temporarily offset the potential loss of VLF revenues. This approach would allow the City to maintain core services while protecting overall financial stability should the State again fail to deliver the anticipated funding. However, this strategy is inherently short-term in nature. Utilizing fund balance to address an ongoing revenue shortfall does not resolve the City’s structural imbalance and would effectively serve as a temporary patch. If the City permanently loses this revenue source, a sustainable, ongoing solution will be required, which may include identifying alternative renewable revenue sources, implementing cost containment measures, or reducing service levels to align expenditures with available revenues.

Staff will continue working with regional partners on advocacy efforts, closely monitor developments in the State budget, and provide updates to the City Council throughout the FY 2026-27 budget development process as additional information becomes available.

Strategy #3: Prioritize Revenue-Generating Development to Strengthen the City's LongTerm Financial Base (Supports Goals #1 and #3) The City recently presented a comprehensive Economic Development Workplan that outlines a strategic and phased approach to strengthening Pacifica’s economic base and supporting longterm fiscal sustainability. This workplan recognizes that economic development must address both short-term revenue opportunities and longer-term, catalytic projects that expand the City’s tax base. Given the City’s ongoing structural deficit and limited discretionary revenue sources, prioritizing implementation of this workplan is a key component of building a more financially resilient future.

In the near term, the Economic Development Workplan focuses on revenue-generating strategies such as filling commercial vacancies, supporting business retention and expansion, and attracting new businesses to Pacifica’s commercial corridors. These efforts are designed to increase sales tax revenue, stabilize the local business environment, and improve overall economic activity. This includes proactive outreach to property owners and brokers, improving permitting and development processes, and implementing targeted placemaking and corridor revitalization efforts that make Pacifica more attractive to businesses and visitors. These shorter-term actions can help stabilize and incrementally grow revenues while larger initiatives move forward.

At the same time, the City is advancing longer-term, high-impact development opportunities that have the potential to significantly expand the City’s revenue base. This includes advancing housing development projects that increase assessed property values, support local businesses, and help meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) obligations. In addition, the City continues to make progress on hotel development opportunities, including the City-owned site at 2212 Beach Boulevard, which represents a significant opportunity to generate locally controlled Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) revenue, increase visitor spending, and diversify the City’s tax base.

Many neighboring cities in San Mateo County have successfully implemented similar strategies, including new hotel developments, mixed-use projects, and commercial revitalization efforts, resulting in increased property values, expanded tax revenues, and improved fiscal stability.

Pacifica now has the opportunity to pursue a similar path while maintaining its community character and coastal identity.
10 Packet Pg. 434
Pacifica City Council 7
April 13, 2026
Strategy #4: Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) (Supports Goal #1) The City is currently working with a consultant to develop a comprehensive Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) as part of a broader effort to improve financial transparency, strengthen cost recovery practices, and ensure long-term fiscal sustainability. The CAP identifies central service and administrative costs, such as Finance, Human Resources, and Facilities, and allocates those costs across departments based on how services are utilized. This process ensures that the full cost of service delivery is accurately understood and consistently applied across the organization. The CAP uses a structured methodology that reviews the City’s budget, organizational structure, and service delivery model to determine appropriate cost allocations and develop fully burdened rates for City services.

The development of fully burdened rates is a critical component of this effort, as it incorporates not only direct personnel costs, but also departmental and central service overhead. This provides a more complete and accurate representation of what it truly costs the City to deliver services. These rates will serve as the foundation for evaluating user fees and internal service charges, ensuring that fees are based on defensible and transparent cost methodologies. In many cases, local governments have historically under-allocated these indirect costs, resulting in a greater reliance on the General Fund to subsidize services that could otherwise be more adequately recovered.

As the CAP is finalized, staff will work with the consultant to quantify the fiscal impact to the General Fund, including identifying areas where costs are currently subsidized and where adjustments could improve cost recovery. While the final results are still being developed, the CAP is expected to provide a range of impacts and policy options that will be incorporated into the FY 2026-27 Base Budget. This will allow the City Council to consider how best to balance cost recovery, service accessibility, and community priorities, while ensuring that the City’s financial structure more accurately reflects the true cost of operations.

Strategy #5: Development Impact and User Fees (Supports Goals #1 and #3) In conjunction with the Cost Allocation Plan, the City is undertaking a comprehensive update to its Development Impact Fees and User Fee Schedule, which have not been comprehensively reviewed in several years. This effort is intended to ensure that fees charged for City services and development-related impacts are aligned with the actual cost of providing those services, consistent with legal requirements and best practices. The consultant’s scope includes a full evaluation of direct and indirect service costs, benchmarking against peer agencies, and developing updated fee schedules that are transparent, defensible, and policy-driven.

The User Fee Study specifically evaluates the full cost of service delivery using the fully burdened rates developed through the CAP and compares those costs to the City’s current fee structure. In many cases, fees may not fully recover the cost of service, resulting in a subsidy from the General Fund. While some level of subsidy may be appropriate based on policy considerations, such as promoting access to services or advancing community goals - these decisions should be made intentionally by the City Council. The study will provide a range of cost recovery options, allowing the Council to determine appropriate fee levels based on policy direction, including whether to maintain, reduce, or eliminate subsidies for certain services.

Although, the study and most importantly Council’s policy determination for cost recovery level are not going to be complete before the adoption of the budget, staff would have to conservatively build-in some cost-recovery assumptions into FY 2026-27. 10 Packet Pg. 435
Pacifica City Council 8
April 13, 2026
Similarly, the Development Impact Fee (DIF) Study evaluates the one-time fees charged to new development to ensure that growth pays its fair share of the infrastructure and facilities needed to support it. These fees are calculated based on a legally required nexus analysis and must demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the impact of development, consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act. Given the timing of the budget process, staff will incorporate reasonable assumptions for fee adjustments into the FY 2026-27 Base Budget; however, final fee recommendations will be brought back to the City Council through a separate public process, including study sessions and formal adoption hearings. This ensures that the City maintains a transparent, policy-driven approach while positioning itself to improve long-term fiscal sustainability.

NEXT STEPS
Collectively, the strategies outlined above are intended to help reduce the City’s structural deficit and improve long-term fiscal sustainability. However, while these actions are important and necessary, they will only address part of the challenge. Even with successful implementation, the City is likely to continue facing structural imbalance that will require a broader evaluation of service levels to align ongoing operating expenditures with available operating revenues. This process will require a thoughtful, measured, and transparent approach, and will inevitably involve difficult choices.

To support this effort, between now and the June Budget Study Session, all departments will be asked to conduct a comprehensive review of the services they provide and categorize them into three broad groups:

Category 1: Mandated & Public Health and Safety Services Federally, state, or legally required services, and those directly tied to protecting life, property, and public safety.

Category 2: Core / Essential Services
Critical services necessary to maintain basic City operations and community functioning, but not legally mandated.

Category 3: Discretionary Services / Community Enhancements Services that enhance quality of life, community identity, and long-term vibrancy.

As part of this analysis, staff will be evaluating all current vacancies to determine their operational impact and feasibility for potential savings. This review will require coordination with Department Directors to consider service impacts, workload distribution, and long-term organizational needs, with the goal of identifying responsible opportunities to generate budgetary savings while maintaining core service levels.

It is important to recognize that all of these services are valuable and contribute meaningfully to the character and livability of Pacifica. Many discretionary and enhancement services are deeply appreciated by the community and play an important role in maintaining the quality of life residents expect and deserve.

However, this analysis is necessary to provide a clear, transparent framework for evaluating service priorities and identifying potential options to address the City’s structural deficit. This process will help inform future policy decisions and ensure that any adjustments are made thoughtfully, strategically, and in alignment with community values and long-term fiscal 10 Packet Pg. 436
Pacifica City Council 9
April 13, 2026
sustainability.

Staff will factor in the Council’s feedback on these and any other preliminary budget strategies in the budget development process. On May 11, 2026, the City Council will also consider the adoption of updates to the Strategic Plan and priorities. That strategic framework will serve as a critical roadmap for the organization, outlining the City’s short and long-term priorities and objectives, that also directly translate into the workplan and budget recommendations for the upcoming FY 2026-27 Budget.

On May 11, 2026, staff will also present the FY 2026-27 Base Budget and the recommended funding for the FY 2026-27 Capital Improvement Plan. In subsequent budget sessions, more defined budget options and recommendations will be brought forward before the final adoption of the FY 2026-27 Budget in June.

ALTERNATIVE ACTION:

This item is being presented as informational only and no action is being requested at this time.

RELATION TO CITY COUNCIL GOALS AND WORK PLAN:

The Budget development process serves all five City Council goals.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no action or fiscal impact associated with this item. This is an informational presentation seeking the Council’s initial input to help guide the further development of budget recommendations. As reflected in the budget calendar above, City Manager will be bringing forward the FY 2026-27 Base Budget and more in-depth recommendations for budget strategies, policy options, and service change recommendations at future meetings.

ORIGINATED BY:

Finance Department
ATTACHMENT LIST:

Attachment 1 - Long Term Financial Forecast (PDF)
10 Packet Pg. 437
City of Pacifica
Long Term Financial Forecast Table and Assumptions
General Fund
revised March 2026 for Strategic Planning
LTFF will be revisisted during the FY 2026/27 Budget Process

REVENUE
2025-2026
Adopted Budget
2025-2026
Revised Budget
2026-2027
Projected
2027-2028
Projected
2028-2029
Projected
2029-2030
Projected
2030-2031
Projected
2031-2032
Projected
2032-2033
Projected
2033-2034
Projected
2034-2035
Projected
Property Tax 17,466,700 17,728,670 $ 18,349,200 $ 18,991,400 $ 19,656,100 $ 20,344,100 $ 21,056,100 $ 21,793,100 $ 22,555,900 $ 23,345,400 $ 24,162,500 Vehicle License Fees 5,410,902 4,639,057 3,498,579 4,623,976 5,953,841 6,856,277 7,876,674 7,781,402 8,772,534 10,301,412 9,761,571 Curr Yr VLF 5,954,201 5,954,201 6,347,200 6,766,100 7,212,700 7,688,700 8,196,200 8,737,100 9,313,700 9,928,400 10,583,700 Curr Yr Shortfall (2,869,875) (2,869,875) (3,909,634) (5,011,999) (5,168,493) (5,844,422) (5,488,019) (6,800,120) (6,029,185) (6,427,108) (6,851,314) Prev Yrs Backfill* 2,326,576 1,554,731 1,061,013 2,869,875 3,909,634 5,011,999 5,168,493 5,844,422 5,488,019 6,800,120 6,029,185 Sales Tax 3,241,230 3,125,230 3,187,700 3,251,500 3,332,800 3,416,100 3,501,500 3,589,000 3,678,700 3,770,700 3,865,000 Measure Y 2,505,100 2,560,000 2,611,200 2,663,400 2,730,000 2,798,300 2,151,225 - - - - Transient Occupancy Tax 2,358,000 2,984,221 1,999,000 1,741,500 1,793,700 1,847,500 1,902,900 1,960,000 2,018,800 2,079,400 2,141,800 Utility Users Tax 2,870,000 3,646,762 3,719,700 3,794,100 3,870,000 3,947,400 4,026,300 4,106,800 4,188,900 4,272,700 4,358,200 Other Tax - Franchise Tax 1,352,550 1,171,440 1,200,700 1,230,700 1,261,500 1,293,000 1,325,300 1,358,400 1,392,400 1,427,200 1,462,900 Other Tax - Business License Tax 582,000 582,000 596,100 608,400 623,600 639,200 655,200 671,600 688,400 705,600 723,200 Other Tax - Cannabis Tax 800,000 700,000 714,000 728,300 742,900 757,800 773,000 788,500 804,300 820,400 836,800 Excess ERAF 3,860,000 3,860,000 3,917,900 3,976,700 4,036,400 4,096,900 4,158,400 4,220,800 4,284,100 4,348,400 4,413,600 Department/Program Revenues 11,260,824 11,103,824 11,461,100 11,727,100 12,137,500 12,562,300 13,001,900 13,457,000 13,928,000 14,415,500 14,920,100 Intergovernmental 2,762,824 2,656,524 2,709,700 2,763,900 2,860,600 2,960,700 3,064,300 3,171,600 3,282,600 3,397,500 3,516,400 Investment Earnings 972,100 998,100 1,018,100 1,038,500 1,074,800 1,112,400 1,151,300 1,191,600 1,233,300 1,276,500 1,321,200 Charges for Services 7,525,900 7,449,200 7,733,300 7,924,700 8,202,100 8,489,200 8,786,300 9,093,800 9,412,100 9,741,500 10,082,500 Transfers In 1,478,800 1,478,800 1,593,800 1,625,700 1,658,200 1,691,400 1,725,200 1,759,700 1,794,900 1,830,800 1,867,400 Total Annual Revenue $ 53,186,106 $ 53,580,004 $ 52,848,979 $ 54,962,776 $ 57,796,541 $ 60,250,277 $ 62,153,699 $ 61,486,302 $ 64,106,934 $ 67,317,512 $ 68,513,071 Revenue Year-to-Year 8.65% 7.04% -1.36% 4.00% 5.16% 4.25% 3.16% -1.07% 4.26% 5.01% 1.78%

EXPENDITURES
2025-2026
Adopted Budget
2025-2026
Revised Budget
2026-2027
Projected
2027-2028
Projected
2028-2029
Projected
2029-2030
Projected
2030-2031
Projected
2031-2032
Projected
2032-2033
Projected
2033-2034
Projected
2034-2035
Projected
S&B 36,454,015 36,553,464 $ 38,230,302 $ 39,759,514 $ 41,349,895 $ 43,003,891 $ 44,724,046 $ 46,513,008 $ 48,373,528 $ 50,308,470 $ 52,320,808 Salary Savings (5%) - (1,461,842) (1,911,515) (1,987,976) (2,067,495) (2,150,195) (2,236,202) (2,325,650) (2,418,676) (2,515,423) (2,616,040) Salaries & Benefits 36,454,015 35,091,621 36,318,787 37,771,539 39,282,400 40,853,696 42,487,844 44,187,358 45,954,852 47,793,046 49,704,768 Contract Services 8,719,867 9,995,643 9,810,600 10,006,800 10,206,900 10,411,000 10,619,200 10,831,600 11,048,200 11,269,200 11,494,600 Material/Supplies/Maintenance 4,501,536 5,031,381 5,106,900 5,183,500 5,261,300 5,340,200 5,420,300 5,501,600 5,584,100 5,667,900 5,752,900 Transfers Out - Debt Service 2,048,781 1,419,798 2,990,583 3,067,962 3,088,206 2,895,486 1,797,046 1,781,108 1,570,438 1,520,294 1,520,412 Transfers Out - Allocations 1,419,798 2,041,561 2,072,200 2,103,300 2,134,800 2,166,800 2,199,300 2,232,300 2,265,800 2,299,800 2,334,300 Total annual operating Expenditures $ 53,143,997 $ 53,580,004 $ 56,299,070 $ 58,133,101 $ 59,973,606 $ 61,667,182 $ 62,523,690 $ 64,533,966 $ 66,423,390 $ 68,550,240 $ 70,806,980 Transfers Out - Capital 50,000 50,000 - - - - - - - - - Total General Fund Expenditures $ 53,193,997 $ 53,630,004 $ 56,299,070 $ 58,133,101 $ 59,973,606 $ 61,667,182 $ 62,523,690 $ 64,533,966 $ 66,423,390 $ 68,550,240 $ 70,806,980 Exp Year-to-Year 10.06% 12.50% 4.98% 3.26% 3.17% 2.82% 1.39% 3.22% 2.93% 3.20% 3.29% GF Structural Surplus/Deficit $ 42,109 $ (0) $ (3,450,091) $ (3,170,325) $ (2,177,065) $ (1,416,905) $ (369,991) $ (3,047,664) $ (2,316,455) $ (1,232,728) $ (2,293,909) Surplus/Def as % of GF Revenues 0.08% 0.00% -6.53% -5.77% -3.77% -2.35% -0.60% -4.96% -3.61% -1.83% -3.35% Beginning Fund Balance 19,309,076 22,635,647 22,585,647 19,135,556 15,965,231 13,788,166 12,371,261 12,001,270 8,953,606 6,637,151 5,404,423 Total Revenues 53,186,106 53,580,004 52,848,979 54,962,776 57,796,541 60,250,277 62,153,699 61,486,302 64,106,934 67,317,512 68,513,071 Total Expenditures 53,193,997 53,630,004 56,299,070 58,133,101 59,973,606 61,667,182 62,523,690 64,533,966 66,423,390 68,550,240 70,806,980 Projected Ending Fund Balance $ 19,301,185 $ 22,585,647 $ 19,135,556 $ 15,965,231 $ 13,788,166 $ 12,371,261 $ 12,001,270 $ 8,953,606 $ 6,637,151 $ 5,404,423 $ 3,110,514 Non-Spendable 8,287 23,188 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 Restricted 542,791 750,133 917,633 1,085,133 1,252,633 1,420,133 1,587,633 1,755,133 1,922,633 2,090,133 2,257,633 Assigned Reserves
Policy Level of 10% of Expenditures 5,314,400 5,358,000 5,629,907 5,813,310 5,997,361 6,166,718 6,252,369 6,453,397 6,642,339 6,855,024 7,080,698 VLF Restriction Budget Strategy #2 2,300,000 - - - - - - - - - - Facility Maintenance & Replacement 205,000 117,992 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 205,000 Compensated Absences 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Child Care Reserve 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 488,591 Legal Reserves 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Assigned Reserves 8,607,991 6,264,583 6,623,498 6,806,901 6,990,952 7,160,309 7,245,960 7,446,988 7,635,930 7,848,615 8,074,289 Non-Spendable, Restricted & Assigned 9,159,069 7,037,904 7,566,131 7,917,034 8,268,585 8,605,442 8,858,593 9,227,121 9,583,563 9,963,748 10,356,922 Unassigned Fund Balance $ 10,142,116 $ 15,547,742 $ 11,569,425 $ 8,048,197 $ 5,519,581 $ 3,765,819 $ 3,142,677 $ (273,514) $ (2,946,412) $ (4,559,325) $ (7,246,408) Unassigned balance as % of Op. Exp. 19.07% 28.99% 20.55% 13.84% 9.20% 6.11% 5.03% -0.42% -4.44% -6.65% -10.23% GFOA Recommended Reserves 8,857,333 8,930,001 9,383,178 9,688,850 9,995,601 10,277,864 10,420,615 10,755,661 11,070,565 11,425,040 11,801,163 Above/(Below) GFOA Guidelines 1,284,783 6,617,741 2,186,247 (1,640,653) (4,476,020) (6,512,045) (7,277,938) (11,029,175) (14,016,977) (15,984,365) (19,047,571) * If VLF lobbying efforts fail, the entirety of the backfill revenue will be at jeopardy, and thus be adding to the deficit.

10.a
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Long Term Financial Forecast (6184 : FY 2026-27 Budget Planning Process,

LONG-TERM FINANCIAL FORECAST ASSUMPTIONS
Updated March 2026 for Strategic Plan, LTFF will be revisited during the FY 2026/27 Budget Process The long-term financial model features a set of assumptions for revenues and expenditures based on conservative projections and information available at the time of publication. The forecast starts with the FY 2025-26 adopted budget, and includes preliminary FY 2025-26 mid-year revisions, plus nine (9) forecasted years, for a ten (10) year financial forecast. This forecast is intended to be used to guide strategic budgeting and financial stability efforts, in accordance with Strategic Goal #1 – Enhance organizational and fiscal stability.

Revenue Assumptions

1. Property Tax is the City's biggest revenue category. Based on the current collection trends, consistent with the anticipated increases in the assessed market value and information provided by the county and HdL, the City’s property tax consultant, these revenues are forecasted to trend higher than adopted budget, therefore have been adjusted with the mid-year revision. These revenues assume a 3.5% increase for the upcoming year and annually thereafter.

2. Vehicle License Fees (VLF) are tied to property-assessed value growth and a corresponding growth in tax revenue. Utilizing the estimates from San Mateo County, VLF assumes a 6.6% increase year over year, however the State has been unable to fulfill its payments in the year due, causing a shortfall each year. The shortfall becomes an estimate to be received two years later, which is referenced as a backfill. The FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget included the projected shortfall in the current year of $2.8 million, which will be due in FY 2028. The preliminary assumptions included the backfill to be received in the current year owed from FY 2024, in the amount of $2.3 million. After the Budget Study Session 1, Council approved Budget Strategy #2, that placed $2.3 million as assigned reserves in case the State doesn’t fulfill its obligation. However, since the State’s Budget only included paying cities 2/3 of the backfill amount, the 2025-26 revised budget shows this reduction in VLF revenues of $771,845. The VLF Backfill revenue is in constant jeopardy of not being received in future years. If the current lobbying efforts fail the entire backfill revenues due to the City next year will be in jeopardy, which would increase the FY 2026-27 projected deficit from $3.45m to $4.5m. The City has joined the lawsuit against the State along with San Mateo County and other affected cities in pursuit of the withheld VLF revenues.

3. Sales Tax is projecting a slight decline with the mid-year revision, however going forward a modest increase of 2% for the next two years based on the most recent projections by HdL (the City’s Sales Tax consultant), followed by a 2.5% increase for the next seven years to consider the cyclical nature of these revenues driven by the local economy.

4. Measure Y is the ½ % voter-approved Transaction and Use Tax that went into effect on April 1, 2023. The same projection method is applied to Measure Y as the other regular 1% of Bradley Burns Local Sales and Use Tax mentioned above, after reflecting a modest increase in the midyear revision, assuming a 2% increase through FY 2028 and 2.5% for the future years. Measure Y transactions and use tax measure is scheduled to sunset in 2031 and the forecast reflects that revenue reduction.

5. Transient Occupancy Tax reflects an increase for projected actuals with the mid-year revision and assumes a 2.5% increase through FY 2028 and a normal inflation change of 3% thereafter for the subsequent seven years. Unfortunately, due to the Council’s recent ordinance changes related to short-term rental (STR) regulations, the forecast incorporates a reduction of almost $1.5 million over the next three years due to a projected reduction in both coastal and non-coastal renewals.

10.a
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Long Term Financial Forecast (6184 : FY 2026-27 Budget Planning Process, Timeline and Preliminary Budget

6. Utility Users' Taxes (UUT) incorporates a mid-year revision to reflect increases in projected actuals due to increased UUT collected on rate changes across the various gas and electric tiers and variety of customers. Revenues in this category also assume a uniform 2.0% increase for all remaining years conservatively forecasted.

7. Other Taxes include business license tax, cannabis operations tax, and franchise tax. A modest

2.5% increase is projected for these tax categories in future years. However, this category was also affected by the Council’s recent ordinance changes related to STR regulations and a slight decrease in business license activity was incorporated. Cannabis tax revenue has a decline in the mid-year revision due to a reduction in cannabis operators.

8. For FY 2025-26 the General Fund received 100% of the Excess Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) revenues projected. This is a change from the Council Policy of allocating only $145K of ERAF to the General Fund and splitting the rest of the ERAF funding 50% each between the Disaster Accounting Fund (Fund 238) and the Housing In lieu Fund (Fund 224).

Given the structural deficit the financial forecast keeps the current allocation to the General Fund in place through 2035. Council direction could change from year to year on this allocation methodology.

9. Departmental or Program Revenues include building, planning, and other permits, recreation revenues, grants, and rentals. The mid-year revision shows a slight decline due to trending forecasts on the STR permits, and loss of Senior Programs funding. This category includes a 2% increase through 2028, and a 3.5% increase thereafter based on the anticipated continuation of the current service activity level, plus inflationary adjustments to the Wastewater Fund administrative service fee and an anticipated increase in investment income.

10. Operating Transfers in reflect a modest increase of 2% in the out years to account for the cost increases that drive this transfer relationship. This category mainly includes the cost recovery reimbursements from Fund 216 (NPDES), Fund 210 (Gas Tax) and Fund 209 (Measure A).

Expenditures Assumptions

1. Salaries and Benefits (S&B) The FY 2025-26 adopted budget includes a full-time equivalent count of 201.75 Citywide. During the budget process Council made a one-time policy decision to not allocate $214k to the pension trust for FY 2025-26. For the mid-year revision, mou increases were incorporated with a 4.0% salary savings applied to account for these increases. The remaining years include a 4.0% increase annually thereafter to account for increases related to cost of medical, dental, and vision benefits, PERS rates, and unfunded pension liability payments, merit, and other labor-related increases, with a 5% salary savings factor, and include contributions to both the pension and OPEB trusts.

2. Contractual Services category assumes an annual increase of 2.0% for most City contracts to account for inflation and regular CPI increases in existing contracts.

3. Materials, Supplies, and Maintenance category assumes a modest 1.5% increase each year to account for inflation.

4. Operating Transfers Out Debt Service category is projected to be in accordance with the City’s updated debt service schedule for each projected year. These are the major debt service obligations included in financing: 2016 COP, 2019 POB, 2021 Civic Center, and the new 2023 Fire Equipment Lease. A reduction of the debt payment starting with FY 2031 is related to the projected payoff for the Pension Obligation Bond.

5. Operating Transfers Out Allocations category accounts for transfers to Internal Service Funds, including the Risk Management funds for General Liability and Worker's Compensation insurance

10.a
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Long Term Financial Forecast (6184 : FY 2026-27 Budget Planning Process, Timeline and Preliminary Budget premiums and Motor Pool funds to cover motor pool operating expenditures. Also included in this category is an ongoing allocation to the motor pool vehicle replacement fund in order build up fund balance for future fleet replacement. The forecast shows a modest 1.5% increase each year to account for rising insurance premiums.

6. Capital Transfers Out category contains the approved allocation of $50k for the FY 2025-26 budget year. With no automatic ongoing contribution to capital in the future years.

10.a
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment 1 - Long Term Financial Forecast (6184 : FY 2026-27 Budget Planning Process, Timeline and Preliminary Budget