Palm Desert City Council
April 24, 2025

PALM DESERT CITY COUNCIL

STUDY SESSION MEETING
AGENDA

Thursday, April 24, 2025
2:30 p.m.

Council Chamber, City Hall
73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, California
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the purpose of the Study Session is to review the items listed on the agenda. No action will be taken.

This is a joint meeting of the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency to the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, Palm Desert Housing Authority, and Palm Desert Board of Library Trustees.

Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person, and up to two Councilmembers may attend remotely.

WATCH THE MEETING LIVE: Watch the City Council meeting live at the City’s website:
https://palmdesert.zoom.us/ or on the City's YouTube Channel.

OPTIONS FOR PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING:

Send your comments by email to: [email protected].

Emails received prior to 10:00 a.m. on the day of the City Council meeting will be made part of the record and distributed to the City Council. Emails will not be read aloud at the meeting.

Pages

1. CALL TO ORDER - STUDY SESSION

2. STUDY SESSION TOPICS

2.a PALM DESERT VISION ZERO STRATEGY 3
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file presentation on the Palm Desert Zero Vision Strategy.

2.b LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION START TIMES 499 RECOMMENDATION:

Provide feedback on addressing code inconsistencies for landscape maintenance and construction start times.

2.c EL PASEO COURTESY CART PROGRAM 503
RECOMMENDATION:

Provide feedback on future operations of the El Paseo Courtesy Cart program.

3. ADJOURNMENT

4. PUBLIC NOTICES
NOTE: Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2449, this meeting may be conducted by teleconference. Study Session is accessible in person or on the City’s website:
www.palmdesert.gov under the Council Agenda link at the top of the page.

Agenda Related Materials: Pursuant to Government Code §54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with this meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, Palm Desert Civic Center, 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert. Staff reports for all agenda items considered in open session, and documents provided to a majority of the legislative bodies are available for public inspection at City Hall and on the City’s website at www.palmdesert.gov by clicking “Council Agenda” at the top of the page.

Americans with Disabilities Act: It is the intention of the City of Palm Desert to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (760) 346-0611, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Michelle Nance, Acting Assistant City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing agenda for the Palm Desert City Council, Successor Agency for the Palm Desert Redevelopment Agency, and Housing Authority, was posted on the City Hall bulletin board and City website www.palmdesert.gov no less than 72 hours prior to the meeting.
/S/ Michelle Nance
Acting Assistant City Clerk
City Council Study Session
April 24, 2025
2

CITY OF PALM DESERT

STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 24, 2025
PREPARED BY: Chris Gerry, Senior Project Manager
SUBJECT: STUDY SESSION: PALM DESERT VISION ZERO STRATEGY RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and file presentation on the Palm Desert Zero Vision Strategy.

BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:

Federal Grant Program:

In 2022, the U.S. Department of Transportation began a new grant program known as Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A). This federal discretionary program was appropriated with $5 billion over a five-year period (2022 to 2026). The SS4A Program funds initiatives to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries.

The SS4A Program divides into two types of grants: Planning and Implementation grants.

Planning grants provide funds to develop or supplement a safety action plan. Implementation grants provide funds to implement projects and strategies identified in Planning grants to address roadway safety problems. Applicants are only eligible to apply for Implementation grants following the award and implementation of Planning grants.

As part of this effort, the City of Palm Desert (City) was awarded an SS4A Planning Grant to develop the Palm Desert Vision Zero Strategy, including two key plans: (1) Safe Routes to School and (2) Safe Routes for Older Adults. Both plans evaluate pedestrian and bicycle conditions within a half-mile radius around strategic areas to identify opportunities for safety and mobility improvements.

This study session provides an overview of the Vision Zero Strategy and its key components.

Staff will return to the City Council on May 22, 2025, with a resolution for adoption and the final draft versions of both plans. Councilmembers are encouraged to share any comments or suggested revisions prior to that date. The Planning Grant remains on schedule and within budget, with all grant activities required to be completed by the close-out deadline of July 31, 2025.

Grant Award and Activities:

In September 2022, the City submitted an SS4A Planning grant application for the Vision Zero Strategy to conduct planning and public engagement efforts aimed at reducing local roadway fatalities and injuries. The City’s application requested $970,000, including a $250,000 nonfederal share (local match). In July 2023, the City was awarded the full SS4A Planning Grant to develop the strategy, including the following elements:
3 City of Palm Desert
Palm Desert Vision Zero Strategy

 Safe Routes to Schools Plan: The plan provides a framework for improving safety and access for students walking or biking to school by identifying both infrastructure and programmatic strategies. It focuses on the areas within a half-mile radius of eight public schools serving Palm Desert students, assessing pedestrian and bicyclist conditions that may affect safe travel. The analysis considers school access patterns, roadway characteristics, traffic volumes, and collision history, with particular attention to student drop-off and pick-up periods. Community outreach played a key role in informing the assessment and shaping the resulting recommendations, which include site-specific improvements and non-infrastructure strategies related to education, encouragement, and school-based safety programs.
 Safe Routes for Older Adults Plan: The plan provides a framework for improving mobility and safety for older adults by identifying barriers and opportunities related to walking, bicycling, and street crossings in areas commonly accessed by older adults. It focuses on three study areas, each defined by a half-mile radius around key destinations for older adults, to reflect the typical walking distances for aging residents. The assessment evaluates pedestrian infrastructure, roadway conditions, and accessibility challenges, incorporating factors such as sidewalk continuity, intersection design, traffic speeds, and signal timing. Community input again shaped the evaluation and informed the development of targeted recommendations, which include infrastructure improvements and supportive strategies designed to improve safety, comfort, and confidence for older adult travelers.
 Public Engagement and Activation: Public engagement funding supported the launch of the Very Important Pedestrian (VIP) campaign, a locally branded initiative focused on improving pedestrian safety across Palm Desert. A professionally produced public service announcement filmed on El Paseo served as the foundation for the campaign’s visual identity and messaging. The campaign aimed to raise awareness about safe pedestrian crossings at marked crosswalks and to encourage lower vehicle speeds around pedestrians. Supporting marketing materials were developed around the video and deployed citywide to reinforce safety messaging and promote active transportation.  Investment Strategy: The Investment Strategy serves as an administrative tool that presents a flexible menu of infrastructure and programmatic options aligned with the goals of Vision Zero. Designed to support future grant applications – particularly SS4A Implementation Grants – it consolidates potential projects identified through the planning process and related documents. Rather than prescribing a fixed capital plan, the strategy is structured to adapt based on evolving grant criteria, funding availability, and community needs. Projects were evaluated and prioritized based on their potential to enhance safety, their technical feasibility, and their alignment with federal and state funding priorities.  Dashboard and Monitoring Tool: This tool provides a centralized platform for presenting data related to roadway conditions, crash severity, and high-injury locations within Palm Desert. It outlines the purpose of the strategy, identifies the City’s high-injury network, and summarizes crashes by type and severity. The dashboard also includes a toolbox of countermeasures and strategies developed through the planning process. 4 City of Palm Desert
Palm Desert Vision Zero Strategy

 Project Administration: Project administration funds supported City efforts to manage the grant, coordinate consultant activities, ensure federal compliance, and cover general overhead costs associated with project delivery.

Consultant Selection:

To implement the work outlined in the grant, the City released a Request for Proposal (RFP) in September 2023 and received three proposals by the submission deadline in November 2023.

The City awarded a professional services agreement in January 2024 to Alta Planning + Design, Inc., in the amount of $948,920. Alta was selected for their demonstrated experience with similar projects and their strong approach to public engagement. Their proposal also addressed the City’s request to include professional marketing and creative services to support the public engagement and activation campaign. The contract amount is consistent with the funding awarded through the Planning grant as well.

Future Grant Application:

Completion of the Planning Grant positions the City to pursue an Implementation Grant to support construction and programmatic initiatives outlined in the strategy. The next application deadline is in late June 2025, and the Planning grant deliverables must be approved by the City Council prior to submission. Staff will work with the Active Transportation Plan Subcommittee to review the scope of the application and prioritize eligible projects. For this upcoming cycle, $580 million in federal funding is available, with an estimated 40 to 70 awards expected, ranging from $2.5 million to $25 million.

Legal Review:

This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

There is no direct financial impact resulting from this study session.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Safe Routes to School Plan

2. Safe Routes for Older Adults Plan
5 6
7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
City of Palm Desert
» Chris Gerry
Senior Project Manager
Public Works
» Thomas Soule
Public Affairs Manager
Economic Development
Project Consultants
» Sam Corbett
Principal-in-Charge
Alta Planning + Design
» Les Brown
Palm Desert SRTS Project Manager
Alta Planning + Design
» Kristin Haukom
Palm Desert SRTS Lead
Alta Planning + Design
» Eric Purcell
Planner
Alta Planning + Design
» Nora Hastings
Graphic Designer
Alta Planning + Design
Advisory Committee
» Brenda Nutcher
Desert Recreation District
» Dina Purvis
City of Indian Wells
» Don Olson
Riverside County Sheriff’s Office
» Dr. Jay Seller
The Joslyn Center
» Jessica Gonzales
City of Palm Desert Finance
» Maureen Archuleta
Desert Recreation District
» Randy Bowman
Coachella Valley Association of Governments
» Steve Libring
City of La Quinta
8 TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Vision for
Safe Routes to School
in Palm Desert 5
Introduction & Background 6
What Is SRTS? 8
How to Use This Plan 9
Palm Desert Today 10
Introduction 11
School Community
Socioeconomic Profile 12
Land Use 14
Climate 16
Existing Pedestrian
and Bicycle Facilities 18
Network Gap Analysis 26
School Area Collision Analysis 42
High-Injury Network 46
Outreach
& Engagement 48
Outreach and Engagement
Overview 49
Summary of Outreach Activities 50
Summary of Outreach Findings 52
Improving
Safe Routes to School
in Palm Desert 54
Recommendations Overview 55
Bicycle Facility Types 56
Pedestrian Facility Types 58
Supporting Infrastructure 60
Palm Desert Safe Routes to School
Infrastructure Recommendations 62
Encouraging
Safe Routes to School
in Palm Desert 148
Programmatic SRTS
Recommendations 149
Implementing
Safe Routes to School
in Palm Desert 158
Funding 159
Appendices 162
A. Complete Existing Conditions Report
B. Complete High-Injury Network
Analysis
C. Complete Outreach
and Engagement Report
D. Crossing Guard Promotional Social
Media Posts in English and Spanish
E. Please Pull Forward Signage in
English and Spanish
F. Safe Routes to School Banner in
English and Spanish
G. Suggested Routes to School Maps for
Palm Desert Schools
H. Sample Student Tally Survey
I. Sample Parent/Caregiver Survey
01 04
05 06
A
02 03
9 ACRONYMS
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
CA AB 1550 California Assembly Bill 1550
CA AB 413 California Assembly Bill 413
CA AB 43 California Assembly Bill 43
Caltrans ATP Caltrans Active Transportation
Program
CAMUTCD California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices
DSUSD Desert Sands Unified School
District
FRPM Free and Reduced Price Meals
HIN High-Injury Network
KSI Killed or Seriously Injured
LPI Leading Pedestrian Interval
LTS Level of Traffic Stress
REAP Regional Early Action Planning
RRFB Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacon
SRTS Safe Routes to School
SS4A Safe Streets and Roads for All
TAP SunLine Transit Ambassador
Program
USDOT United States Department of
Transportation
USDOT ETC USDOT Equitable
Transportation Community
10 01.

The Vision
for Safe
Routes to
School in
Palm Desert
11 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
Table 1: Palm Desert SRTS Schools Details
School Name City* Level
Abraham Lincoln Elementary School Palm Desert Elementary George Washington Charter School Palm Desert Elementary James Earl Carter Elementary School Palm Desert Elementary Palm Desert Charter Middle School Palm Desert Middle
Palm Desert High School Palm Desert High
Ronald Reagan Elementary School Palm Desert Elementary
Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Indian Wells Elementary Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School La Quinta Middle
*Two schools located just outside of Palm Desert are included in this SRTS Plan because their enrollment boundaries serve students located within City limits.

The Palm Desert Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Plan is the culmination of extensive outreach,
engagement, and data collection and analysis
that envisions a Palm Desert where all students
and their families have access to safe, convenient,
and healthy modes of transportation to and from
school. The SRTS Plan is a component of the City
of Palm Desert’s larger Vision Zero Strategy.

With funding from the United States Department
of Transportation (USDOT) Safe Streets and
Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program, the City
of Palm Desert (City) and the SRTS Plan Project
Team (Project Team) developed this SRTS Plan
through a comprehensive review of walking and
biking conditions around eight public elementary,
middle, and high schools in the Desert Sands
Unified School District (DSUSD). The City and
the Project Team also engaged with school staff,
parents and caregivers, residents, and students
to understand mobility challenges around each
school.

Table 1 lists the schools included in the SRTS
Plan, and Figure 1 shows the overall city and the
location of each participating school.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 6 PALM DESERT
12 Santa Rosa
Wildlife Area
Magnesia Spring
Ecological Reserve
UC Deep Canyon
Natural Reserve
Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains National Monument
¥111
¥74

MONTEREY AVE

PLAZADEL SO

HOVLEY LN W L

COOK ST

GRAPEVINE ST

BURSERA WAY

E L PASEO

RES ORTER BLVD

CALIFORNIA DR

SHADOWMOUNTAIN DR

FAIRWAY DR

GRAN VIA

ANDREAS CANYONDR

GARY AVE

SHEPHERD LN

PORTOLA AVE

PALMVALLEY DR

PALM GREENS PK WY

CALIFORNIA AVE

SAN REMO

MAR IP OS A DR

TENNESSEEAVE

TEKISPL

I NDIANR DI GE DR

MESA VIEW DR

GATEWAY DR

COUNTRY CLUB DR

DINAH SHORE DR

AGAV E L N

FRANK SINATRA DR

T A V A
C
LN

ONEJOCRI

MICHIGAN DR

BEL AIR RD

KIVADR HAYSTACK RD

HOVLEY LN E

METATEPL

TAMARISK ROW DR

GERALD FORD DR

SHADOW RI DGE RD

CALLIANDRA ST

ELDORADO DR

OASIS CLUB DR

CASTELLANA S

MESA G R ANDE DR

WILLOW RIDGE

PROJECT SCHOOLS

CITY OF PALM DESERT

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/13/2024.

Schools
Transit Stops
City Boundary
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.5 1 MILES
Figure 1: Palm Desert SRTS School Locations
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 7 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
13 SRTS is a strategy that improves pedestrian
and bicycle travel conditions around schools
to increase opportunities for students and their
families to use active modes of transportation
to get to and from school. Successful SRTS
programs commonly include elements of
each of the six Es: Education, Encouragement,
Enforcement, Equity, Engineering, and
Evaluation. Each E is meant to remove barriers
that prevent students from walking and bicycling
to school.

SRTS is typically divided into two categories:
infrastructure and non-infrastructure.

Infrastructure, also called
engineering, focuses on
improving the built environment
to make active modes of travel
safer, more convenient, and comfortable
for people of all ages and abilities. This is
a key component of SRTS, which prioritizes
infrastructure improvements that specifically
address the needs of students, while also
ensuring sidewalks, paths, crossings, and streets
are safer and more accessible for everyone.

These physical improvements help to foster
environments that are conducive to the use of
active transportation for all, regardless of age
or mobility.

Non-infrastructure, also called
encouragement and education,
complements infrastructure by
promoting activities that make
active modes of travel to school more attractive,
fun, and interesting while also teaching skills to
do so safely.

SRTS is a critical part of building
healthier, safer, and more equitable
communities. SRTS has myriad
benefits including:

Improved safety
for pedestrians and
bicyclists
Reduced traffic
congestion
Improved air quality
Improved health
Improved academic
achievement
Fundamental and lifelong
pedestrian skills learned
Benefit to the local
economy
Stronger sense of
community
More transportation
options for everyone
Strengthened family
bonds
WHAT IS SRTS?
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 8 PALM DESERT
14 HOW TO USE THIS PLAN
This SRTS Plan documents the activities, data collection, and analyses for the City that resulted in actionable infrastructure and non-infrastructure recommendations. Various community members can use the SRTS Plan to identify the content that is important and relevant to them. The following are some examples:

Parents/caregivers can use
the SRTS Plan to understand
the conditions at their students’
school and to become familiar
with suggested routes for
walking and biking to school.

DSUSD staff can use the SRTS
Plan to continue or develop
programs that educate and
encourage students and
parents/caregivers to seek
alternatives to automobile trips
to school and identify ways to
improve on-campus circulation.

They can also use the findings
in the SRTS Plan to obtain grant
funding or achievement awards.

City staff can use the SRTS
Plan to identify issues and
opportunities related to
suggested routes for walking
and bicycling and to prioritize
potential short-term and
long-term infrastructure
improvements. Staff can also
use this SRTS Plan to pursue
SRTS funding opportunities.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 9 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
15 Palm Desert
Today

02. 16
Palm Desert is located in the center of the
Coachella Valley in Riverside County, California.

With year-round sunshine, a growing network
of sidewalks and bicycle facilities, and the City’s
increased efforts to expand active transportation
facilities, Palm Desert is equipped to become
a city where walking and bicycling as daily
modes of transportation for children, families, and
residents is comfortable, safe, and accessible.

Palm Desert has a population of approximately
53,000 permanent residents and 32,000
seasonal residents. Palm Desert’s residents are

70.8% White, 24% Hispanic or Latino, 4.3%
Asian, 2.9% African American, 0.7% Native
American and Alaska Native, 0.3% Native
Hawaiian and Pacific Islander, and 7.6% Other.*
Palm Desert has a median household income of
$64,295, with 12.9% of the population living
below the federal poverty line (Source: Census,
2022). Figure 2 shows the different population
demographics in Palm Desert.

INTRODUCTION
Figure 2: Palm Desert Demographics
*Total exceeds 100% as these categories are
not mutually exclusive (i.e., some individuals may
identify with more than one group).

White
Hispanic or Latino
Asian
African American
Native American and Alaskan Native
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
Other

70.8%
24%

4.3%

2.9%

0.7% 0.3%

7.6%
53,000
permanent residents
32,000
seasonal residents
Palm Desert is home to
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 11 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
17 The following presents a socioeconomic profile of Palm Desert’s school community using Free and Reduced Price Meals (FRPM) eligibility.

The National School Lunch Program is a federally funded program that assists schools in providing free or reduced-price lunches to students based on household income. FRPM eligibility serves as an indicator of socioeconomic vulnerability, highlighting areas where families may face financial challenges that affect access to transportation.

Table 2 and Figure 3 show the Palm Desert SRTS schools and their percentage of students eligible for FRPM during the 2022–2023 school year.

Table 2: K–12 Free or Reduced-Price Meals Data (2022–2023)

SCHOOL COMMUNITY

SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE
School Name Enrollment Percentage (%) Eligible for
Free Meals*
Percentage (%) Eligible for Free
or Reduced-Price Meals†
Abraham Lincoln
Elementary School 585 68.7% 79.5%
Colonel Mitchell Paige
Middle School 436 63.1% 74.3%
George Washington
Charter School 755 35.2% 49.0%
Gerald R. Ford
Elementary School 603 46.3% 58.7%
James Earl Carter
Elementary School 516 41.7% 53.1%
Palm Desert Charter
Middle School 1,347 45.6% 60.3%
Palm Desert High
School 2,050 42.1% 57.3%
Ronald Reagan
Elementary School 834 40.9% 53.2%
* “Eligible for Free Meals” represents students from families whose income qualify for meals at no cost (at or below 130% of the federal poverty level).
† “Eligible for Free or Reduced-Price Meals” is an expanded criteria that represents students whose family meet the income threshold for either free meals or reduced-price meals (130% to 185% of the federal poverty level).

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 12 PALM DESERT
18 Magnesia Spring
Ecological Reserve
Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains National Monument
Santa Rosa
Wildlife Area
¥111
¥74

PLAZADEL SOL

HOVLEY LN W

COOK ST

GRAPEVINE ST

BURSERA WAY

E L PASEO

HOVLEY LN E

RES ORTER BLVD

CALIFORNIA DR

SHADOWMOUNTAIN DR

FAIRWAY DR

GRAN VIA

ANDREAS CANYONDR

SHEPHERD LN

PORTOLA AVE

PALMVALLEY DR

PALM GREENS PK WY

MAR IP OS A DR

TEKISPL

I NDIANR DI GE DR

MESA VIEW DR

GATEWAY DR

COUNTRY CLUB DR

DINAH SHORE DR

AGAV E L N

FRANK SINATRA DR

T A V A LN

MICHIGAN DR

BEL AIR RD

KIVADR HAYSTACK RD

METATEPL

TAMARISK ROW DR

GERALD FORD DR

SHADOW RI DGE RD

CALLIANDRA ST

ELDORADO DR

OASIS CLUB DR

MESA G R ANDE DR

WILLOW RIDGE
Palm Desert
Charter Middle
Abraham Lincoln
Elementary
Colonel Mitchell
Paige Middle
George Washington Charter
Gerald R. Ford
Elementary
James Earl Carter Elementary
Palm Desert High
Ronald Reagan
Elementary

FREE AND REDUCED

PRICE MEALS (FRPM)

ELIGIBILITY

CITY OF PALM DESERT

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, California Department of Education, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 4/10/2024.

PERCENTAGE OF FRPM
Schools ELIGIBLE STUDENTS
Transit Stops
City Boundary
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.5 1 MILES
Above 60% (Most Eligible)
50% - 60%
35% - 50%
Below 35% (Least Eligible)
Figure 3: K–12 Free or Reduced Price Meals Eligibility in Palm Desert (2022–2023) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 13 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
19 Existing land use surrounding schools in Palm
Desert is primarily residential (Figure 4). Most of
the residential areas around schools are singlefamily detached homes with some multi-family parcels. George Washington Charter School is
surrounded by residential land uses but is located
two blocks away from the main commercial
corridor of Palm Desert, El Paseo. Additionally,
some schools are located next to open space
that could provide alternative transportation
and recreational opportunities for students. For
example, Ronald Reagan Elementary School is
bordered by Palm Desert Freedom Park to the
north.

LAND USE
This proximity to open space, along with the
surrounding residential areas, presents an
opportunity to increase walking and biking rates
for students and families. Improving and promoting
pedestrian and bicycle facilities between
these neighborhoods and the schools could
help increase the rates of active transportation
for students, reducing traffic congestion and
promoting healthier, more sustainable commuting
options. Enhanced infrastructure and safer routes
could encourage more students to walk or bike
to school, especially given the accessibility to
recreational areas like the nearby parks.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 14 PALM DESERT
20 Magnesia Spring
Ecological Reserve
Santa Rosa
Wildlife Area
¥111
¥74

MONTEREY AVE

PLAZADEL SO

HOVLEY LN W L

COOK ST

GRAPEVINE ST

BURSERA WAY

E L PASEO

RESO R TER BLVD

CALIFORNIA DR

SHADOWMOUNTAIN DR

FAIRWAY DR

GRAN VIA

ANDREAS CANYONDR

GARY AVE

SHEPHERD LN

PORTOLA AVE

PALMVALLEY DR

PALM GREENS PK WY

CALIFORNIA AVE

SAN REMO

MAR IP OS A DR

TENNESSEEAVE

TEKISPL

I NDIANR DI GE DR

MESA VIEW DR

GATEWAY DR

COUNTRY CLUB DR

DINAH SHORE DR

AGAV E L N

FRANK SINATRA DR

T A V A LN

CONEJO RI C

MICHIGAN DR

BEL AIR RD

KIVADR HAYSTACK RD

HOVLEY LN E

METATE PL

TAMARISK ROW DR

GERALD FORD D
SHA
R

DOW RI DGE RD

CALLIANDRA ST

ELDORADO DR

OASIS CLUB DR

CASTELLANA S

MESA G R ANDE DR

WILLOW RIDGE

LAND USE

CITY OF PALM DESERT

SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 4/10/2024.

LAND USE
Schools
Transit Stops
City Boundary
Parks
0 0.5 1 MILES
High Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Planned Residential
Commercial
Planned Commercial
Professional Offices
Downtown
Public Institution
Open Space
Industrial
¥111
¥74

DE ANZA WAY

PORTOLA AVE

E L PASEO

PARK VIEW DR

FRED WARING DR

CANDLEWOOD ST

HAHN RD

ALESSANDRO DR

SHADOW MOUNTAIN DR

ALUMN I WAY

EDGEHILL DR

ASTER DR

VE L ARDO DR

SANTA ROSA WAY

GUADALUPE AVE

GOLETA AVE

ONE QUAIL
PL
Figure 4: Citywide Land Use
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 15 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
21 Climate plays a crucial role in the use of active
transportation. Palm Desert, with its desert climate,
experiences warm temperatures year-round and
intense heat during the summer months (Table 3). This
extreme heat can discourage students from walking
or biking to school, as it makes travel uncomfortable
and potentially unsafe, especially during the hottest
parts of the day. High temperatures can lead to
dehydration, heat exhaustion, or other heat-related
illnesses. Although a detailed climate analysis was not included in the SRTS Plan, the Project Team carefully
considered the city’s climate when developing the
recommendations included in the plan.

CLIMATE
Table 3: Average Daily Temperature by Month in Palm Desert Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year Mean Daily
Max. °F 70.3 73.3 79.9 85.8 93.1 101.7 105.8 105.2 100.8 90.5 78 68.8 87.8 Daily Mean °F 58.6 62.2 68.5 74.5 81.2 89.2 94.1 93.8 88.7 78.1 65.5 57 76 Mean Daily
Min. °F 46.8 51 57.2 63.1 69.3 76.6 82.5 82.5 76.5 65.8 53 45.3 64.1 Average
Precipitation
Inches

0.65 0.59 0.32 0.07 0.02 0 0.05 0.26 0.13 0.15 0.19 0.49 2.92 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 16 PALM DESERT
22 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 17 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
23 Existing Pedestrian Facilities
The sidewalk network throughout Palm Desert is
relatively well-connected, especially on major
arterials and collector streets. However, many
residential streets lack sidewalks and other
pedestrian infrastructure like marked crossings. In
school areas, many streets have existing sidewalks
leading to the school. However, some schools lack
adequate pedestrian facilities. Portola Avenue,
Hovley Lane, Fred Waring Drive, Washington
Street, and Country Club Road are all major
arterials on which many schools are located.

Because of high traffic volume and speed, these
streets can serve as deterrents to students who
may potentially walk to school.

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN

AND BICYCLE FACILITIES
Existing Bicycle Facilities
As shown in Figure 5, Caltrans breaks down
bicycle facility types by classes that range from I
to IV. Bicycle facility types can be color coded by
level of traffic stress (LTS) with LTS 1 being most
comfortable and LTS 4 being least comfortable for
bicyclists with limited confidence, such as children.

Despite high posted speed limits and multiple lanes
of traffic, the existing local bicycle network in Palm
Desert consists primarily of Class II bike lanes and
Class IIB buffered bike lanes on major arterials
and Class III bicycle routes on lower volume roads.

Class II bike lanes and IIB buffered bike lanes are
suboptimal for such conditions, particularly for
children and less confident bicyclists. These facilities may not provide sufficient safety or comfort for
inexperienced riders, highlighting a need for
infrastructure that better supports their needs,
especially on routes to school.

Palm Desert also has a Class IV separated bikeway
on San Pablo Avenue between Magnesia Falls
Drive and Fred Waring Drive. This facility, however,
changes to Class IIB buffered bike lanes between
Fred Waring Drive and Highway 111.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 18 PALM DESERT
24 Figure 5: Traffic Stress Levels and Corresponding Facility Types

INCREASING LEVEL OF COMFORT, SAFETY, AND INTEREST IN BICYCLING FOR TRANSPORTATION LTS 4
No bike lane on a busy street
LTS 3
Narrow bike lane or shoulder
on a busy street
LTS 2
Buffered bike lane on a calm street
LTS 1
Separated bike lane

CLASS I
Shared-Use Path
» Paths completely separated from
motor vehicle traffic used by people
walking and biking.
» Comfortable for people of all ages
and abilities.
» Typically located immediately
adjacent and parallel to a roadway
or in its own independent right-ofway, such as within a park or along a body of water.
» Bike lanes with at least 5 feet of
separation from traffic vehicle lanes
are also considered shared-use
paths.

CLASS IIB
Buffered Bicycle Lane
» A dedicated lane for bicycle travel
separated from a motor vehicle
travel lane by a painted buffer.
» The buffer provides additional
comfort for users by providing
space from motor vehicles.

CLASS II
Bicycle Lane
» A dedicated lane for bicycle travel
adjacent to a motor vehicle travel
lane.
» A painted white line separates the
bicycle lane from motor vehicle
traffic.

CLASS IV
Separated Bikeway
» An on-street bikeway separated
from a motor vehicle travel lane by
a curb, median, planters, parked
motor vehicles, delineators, and/or
other vertical elements.

CLASS IIIB
Bicycle Boulevard
» Calm, local streets where bicyclists
have priority but share roadway
space with motor vehicles.
» Shared roadway bicycle markings
on the pavement as well as traffic
calming features such as speed
humps and traffic diverters to keep
these streets more comfortable for
bicyclists.
» Comfortable facility for bicyclists
with wider range
of abilities.

CLASS III
Bicycle Route
» A signed bike route that bicyclists
share with motor vehicles.
» Can include pavement markings.
» Comfortable facility for cyclists
who are adept at riding with
motor vehicles.
» Recommended for streets with
low vehicle volumes and speeds.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 19 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
25 Regionally, the CV Link bicycle trail provides bicycle connections through the Coachella Valley. In Palm
Desert, the CV Link primarily comprises high-quality
Class IV facilities that run in an east-west direction
connecting the Bump and Grind Trail, College of
the Desert, Civic Center Park, Abraham Lincoln
Elementary School, Palm Desert Charter Middle
School, Palm Desert High School, and adjacent
residential areas. There was an existing half-mile
Class I facility between Magnesia Falls Drive and
Cook Street that has since been integrated into the
CV Link network.

These existing Class I and IV bike facilities can
be a valuable base for further promoting student
active transportation. These facilities already offer
residents safe, direct routes that reduce the need to
navigate busy streets. Class IV bike lanes, separated
from traffic with physical barriers, provide the most
appropriate on-street facility for student safety and
comfort, particularly for younger or less confident
bicyclists, while Class I facilities provide a low-stress, off-road option. Together, these facilities create
a backbone network of low-stress connections
to neighborhoods and schools, and lay a solid
foundation for future improvements to enhance safety
and encourage more students to bike to school.

Figure 6 shows the total mileage of each bikeway
class while Table 4 displays a list of existing bicycle facilities in Palm Desert. The existing bikeways are
also mapped in Figure 7.

Note: The City has an existing active transportation
program and has recently implemented many of the
proposed walking and biking projects included in its 2016 General Plan. These previously proposed projects were
considered during the development of recommendations
for this SRTS Plan and are listed in Appendix A.

The City is also in the process of updating its bike network map concurrent with an update to its General Plan. The
information provided in this section about existing bike facilities reflects data that was available in 2024, and may not fully capture recent changes to the evolving
network.

Figure 6: Total Mileage by Bikeway Class
Class I
Class II
Class IIB
Class III
Class IV

0.5 mi.

48.61 mi.

0.52 mi.

17.55 mi.

4.96 mi.

72.14 miles

EXISTING BIKE FACILITIES
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 20 PALM DESERT
26 1EKRIWME7TVMRK
)GSPSKMGEP6IWIVZI
7ERXE6SWEERH7ER.EGMRXS
1SYRXEMRW2EXMSREP1SRYQIRX
7ERXE6SWE
;MPHPMJI%VIE
¥
¥
1328)6)=%:)
40%>%()0 73
,3:0)=02; 0
'33/78
+6%4):-2)78
&967)6%;%=
) 0 4%7)3
,3:0)=02)
7,%(3;13928%-2 (6
*%-6;%=(6
+6%2 :-%
%2(6)%7 '%2=32(6
+%6= %:)
7,)4,)6(02
436830%%:)
4%01 :%00)= (6
4%01 +6))27 4/ ;=
'%0-*362-% %:)
7%2 6)13
1% 6- 4 37% (6
8)22)77))%:)
8)/-740
- 2(-%26 (- +) (6
1)7% :-); (6
+%8);%= (6
'39286='09&(6
(-2%, 7,36) (6
%+%: ) 0 2
*6%2/7-2%86%(6
)0(36%(3(6
8 % : %
'
02 32).3'6-
&)0%-66(
/-:%(6 ,%=78%'/6(
1)8%8)40
8%1%6-7/ 63; (6
+)6%0( *36( (6
7,%(3; 6- (+) 6(
'%00-%2(6%78
3%7-7'09&(6
'%78)00%2% 7
1)7% + 6 %2() (6
;-003; 6-(+)
;%62)6 86%-0
8%2(-/% 86% 0-
4 6)78 32 86%-0
)<-78-2+&-/);%=7
'-8=3*4%01()7)68

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
'SEGLIPPE:EPPI]0MRO
'PEWW-

&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

&YJJIVIH&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--&

&MG]GPI6SYXI
'PEWW---

7ITEVEXIH&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW-:

Figure 7: Existing Bikeways in Palm Desert
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 21 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
27 Table 4: Existing Bikeways by Class
Class Street Start Street End Street
Class I CV Link (off-street) Deep Canyon Road Cook Street Class II Country Club Drive Monterey Avenue Washington Street Class II Hovley Lane Monterey Avenue Portola Avenue
Class II Gerald Ford Drive Monterey Avenue Frank Sinatra Drive Class II Frank Sinatra Drive Monterey Avenue 42nd Avenue Class II Portola Avenue Dinah Shore Drive Magnesia Falls Drive Class II Monterey Avenue Gerald Ford Drive Country Club Drive Class II Dick Kelly Drive Monterey Avenue Dinah Shore Drive Class II Dinah Shore Drive City Limit College Drive
Class II Cook Street I-10 Fred Waring Drive
Class II Eldorado Drive Frank Sinatra Drive 42nd Avenue Class II 42nd Avenue Cook Street Washington Street
Class II College Drive Portola Avenue Frank Sinatra Drive Class II University Park College Drive Cook Street
Class II A Street Monterey Avenue Gateway Drive
Class II Gateway Drive Dinah Shore Drive Gerald Ford Drive Class II Dolce Avenue/
Cortesia Way Gateway Drive Dick Kelly Drive
Class II Highway 74 El Paseo S City Limit
Class II Highway 111 W City Limit E City Limit
Class II Painters Path Edgehill Drive El Paseo
Class II Fred Waring Drive San Pascual Avenue Deep Canyon Road Class II Fred Waring Drive Monterey Avenue San Pablo Avenue Class II Deep Canyon Road Magnesia Falls Drive Highway 111 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 22 PALM DESERT
28 Class Street Start Street End Street
Class II Portola Avenue Mesa View Drive Shadow Mountain Drive Class II Mesa View Drive Highway 74 Portola Avenue
Class IIB San Pablo Avenue Highway 111 San Gorgonio Way Class III California Drive Fred Waring Drive Warner Trail Class III Warner Trail Fred Waring Drive 42nd Avenue
Class III Florida Avenue California Drive Fred Waring Drive Class III Idaho Street 42nd Avenue Michigan Drive
Class III Avenue of the States Washington Street California Drive Class III El Paseo Fred Waring Drive De Anza Way
Class III San Gorgonio Way Monterey Avenue Highway 111
Class III San Luis Rey Avenue Ironwoods Street De Anza Way Class III Fairway Drive Portola Avenue E City Limit
Class III Deep Canyon Road Abronia Trail Old Prospector Trail Class III Grapevine Street Highway 74 E City Limit
Class III Shadow Mountain
Drive Highway 74 Portola Avenue
Class III Ocotillo Drive Grapevine Street El Paseo
Class III Joshua Tree Street Grapevine Street San Luis Rey Avenue Class III San Pablo Avenue Shadow Mountain Drive Highway 111 Class III Edgehill Drive Painters Path Tierra del Oro
Class III Calle De Los
Campesinos Along River Along River
Class IV
CV Link (Painters
Path/Magnesia Falls
Drive)
Bump and Grind Trailhead Deep Canyon Road
Class IV San Pablo Avenue Fred Waring Drive Magnesia Falls Drive SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 23 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
29 End-of-Trip Facilities
Bike racks in Palm Desert are primarily
concentrated along El Paseo, San Pablo Avenue,
and Highway 111, areas that host many local
commercial destinations. While newer bike racks
tend to be the preferred post-and-ring style, most
bike parking in the city consists of wave-style
racks, which are less secure and less preferred.*
Several schools, including Palm Desert High
School, provide bike parking for students. Though
these racks are typically wave-style as well, they
are generally located on-campus, away from
public access.
*Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, Essentials of Bike Parking, September 2015 https://www.apbp.org/assets/docs/EssentialsofBikeParking_FINA.pdf.

Other end-of-trip facilities, such as seating and
trash cans, are available near newer bike racks
along San Pablo Avenue. However, most bike
parking areas in Palm Desert lack additional
amenities, like bike tools, pumps, or shelter from
the elements.

Bike parking at the front entrance of Palm Desert High School.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 24 PALM DESERT
30 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 25 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
31 When assessing pedestrian and bicycle network connectivity, natural and man-made elements are an important consideration, particularly when physical barriers impact route directness. Palm Desert has few natural barriers. However, expansive, private communities that are gated and not open to the public make it significantly more tedious and time consuming for pedestrians and bicyclists to travel to and from their destinations. Furthermore, many of the streets in Palm Desert consist of wide arterials with high posted speed limits, heavy traffic volumes, and few pedestrian and bicyclist crossings. While some schools are located on smaller streets in residential areas, many are located on these arterial roads, such as Portola Avenue and Cook Street.

NETWORK GAP ANALYSIS
Bicycle Gaps
Bicycle network gaps can create additional stress
for students biking to school. A complete bicycle
network can encourage young bicyclists to ride
their bike to school more often and feel safe
throughout their travel. As shown in Figure 8,
the more significant gaps in the citywide bicycle
network include a north-south connection on
Monterey Avenue between Magnesia Falls Drive
and Country Club Drive, as well as an east-west
facility continuation on Hovley Lane between Cook
Street and Portola Avenue. Additionally, as shown
in the School Area Collision Analysis (pg. 42),
many collisions involving people walking and
biking occurred along major arterials, including
Highway 111, Fred Waring Drive, Cook Street and
Country Club Drive.

Sidewalk Gaps
Sidewalk gaps can create a barrier for students
walking to school by forcing them to cross a
major roadway or create unnecessary out of
direction travel. Palm Desert’s existing sidewalk
network spans across the city, as observed
by the Project Team during walk audits and
site visits. However, many streets in residential
neighborhoods, including those around the
schools, have significant sidewalk gaps or lack
sidewalks entirely.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 26 PALM DESERT
32 1EKRIWME7TVMRK
)GSPSKMGEP6IWIVZI
7ERXE6SWEERH7ER.EGMRXS
1SYRXEMRW2EXMSREP1SRYQIRX
7ERXE6SWE
;MPHPMJI%VIE
¥
¥
1328)6)=%:)
40%>%()0 73
,3:0)=02; 0
'33/78
+6%4):-2)78
&967)6%;%=
) 0 4%7)3
,3:0)=02)
7,%(3;13928%-2 (6
*%-6;%=(6
+6%2 :-%
%2(6)%7 '%2=32(6
+%6= %:)
7,)4,)6(02
436830%%:)
4%01 :%00)= (6
4%01 +6))27 4/ ;=
'%0-*362-% %:)
7%2 6)13
1% 6- 4 37% (6
8)22)77))%:)
8)/-740
- 2(-%26 (- +) (6
1)7% :-); (6
+%8);%= (6
'39286='09&(6
(-2%, 7,36) (6
%+%: ) 0 2
*6%2/7-2%86%(6
)0(36%(3(6
8 % : %
'
02 32).3'6-
&)0%-66(
/-:%(6 ,%=78%'/6(
1)8%8)40
8%1%6-7/ 63; (6
+)6%0( *36( (6
7,%(3; 6- (+) 6(
'%00-%2(6%78
3%7-7'09&(6
'%78)00%2% 7
1)7% + 6 %2() (6
;-003; 6-(+)
;%62)6 86%-0
8%2(-/% 86% 0-
4 6)78 32 86%-0
&-'='0) 2)8;36/
+%47
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
'SEGLIPPE:EPPI]0MRO
'PEWW-

&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

&YJJIVIH&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--&

&MG]GPI6SYXI
'PEWW---

7ITEVEXIH&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW-:

&XNLSNKNHFSYGNPJSJY\TWPLFU
J]NXYXFQTSL2TSYJWJ^&[JSZJ
GJY\JJS2FLSJXNF+FQQX)WN[JFSI
(TZSYW^(QZG)WN[J
9MJWJNXFSJFXY\JXYGNPJ
SJY\TWPLFUTS-T[QJ^1FSJ
GJY\JJS(TTP8YWJJYFSI
5TWYTQF&[JSZJUFWFQQJQYT
(FWYJW*QJRJSYFW^8HMTTQ
2FS^XJLRJSYXTK+WJI<FWNSL)WN[J
QFHPKFHNQNYNJXKTWGNH^HQNXYX
8LIIEWXWMHISJ4SVXSPE%ZIRYIPEGOW
FMOIPERIWFIX[IIR+VETIZMRI7XVIIX
ERH7LEHS[1SYRXEMR(VMZI
Figure 8: Citywide Bicycle Network Gaps
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 27 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
33 Network Analysis by School
The following provides details of existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities near each school (Figure 9 through Figure 15).

Abraham Lincoln Elementary School
and Palm Desert Charter Middle School
Each school can access the Class IV separated bike lane (CV Link) on their northern edge along Magnesia Falls Drive. There are also existing Class II bike lane facilities along Deep Canyon Road and Fred Waring Drive, and sidewalks along most streets connecting to the school. However, many streets in nearby residential neighborhoods lack sidewalk connectivity, such as along Desert Star Boulevard.

The north side of Desert Star Boulevard lacks sidewalks.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 28 PALM DESERT
34 4EPQ(IWIVX'MZMG
'IRXIV4EVO
1EKRIWME*EPPW
'MX]4EVO
())4'%2=326(
46-1637) (6
+%6=%:)
59-'/7-0:)6(6
7988)67 1-00 6(
()7)68 78%6 &0:(
6980)(+);%=
&98832;33((6
7%24%7'9%0%:)
>-6'32 '-6 ;
1=67-2) %:)
436830%%:)
6%2',36(
7%2830-2%(6
1)6'96= '-6 ;
'%61)0'-6
&9 ) 2% '-6
1%+2)7-%*%007(6
1)6'96= ' 6- )
)6-278
%78)6 (6
/69+%:)
*6)(;%6-2+(6
'%1-23%663=37
:)0%6(3 (6
1%6-+30( (6
+30)8%%:)
46-:%8)6(
46-:%8)78
4EPQ(IWIVX
'LEVXIV1MHHPI
%FVELEQ0MRGSPR
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2+%47

0-2'302)0)1)28%6=
4%01()7)68',%68)61-((0)
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
'SEGLIPPE:EPPI]0MRO
'PEWW-

&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--
&MG]GPI
6SYXI
'PEWW---

HALF-MILE BUFFER
(IWIVX7XEV&SYPIZEVHERMQTSVXERX
IEWX[IWXTIHIWXVMERGSRRIGXMSRPEGOW
WMHI[EPOW
6YXPIHKI;E]MWERI\MWXMRK'PEWW---
&MOI6SYXIERHWLEVVS[W[IVIVIGIRXP]
MRWXEPPIHEPSRK6YXPIHKI;E]
&PJ^GNPJSJY\TWPLFUJ]NXYX
FIX[IIR*VIH;EVMRK (VMZIERH
1EKRIWME*EPPW(VMZIFHNEGIRX XSXLI
WGLSSPW
Figure 9: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 29 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
35 Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School
Colonel Paige Middle School does not have any existing bicycle connections within Palm Desert. There are, however, Class II bike lanes on Fred Waring Drive east of Washington Street and on Palm Royale Drive in La Quinta. There are wide sidewalks along Palm Royale Drive in front of the school, however these terminate south of the school’s property line. There are also large sidewalk gaps on major streets near the school, such as along Fred Waring Drive and Washington Street.

The sidewalk in front of the school terminates to the south of the school property.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 30 PALM DESERT
36 '%00) 0%7 &6-7%7 7
%:)2-(% %0-'%28)
0-7&32 ;%=
()0%;%6)40
89'732'-6
13928%-2:-);
'SPSRIP1MXGLIPP
4EMKI1MHHPI
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
+%47
4%-+) 1-((0)
8(-441
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
'MX]&SYRHEV]
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

HALF-MILE BUFFER
8LIRSVXLWMHISJ*VIH;EVMRK(VMZI
ERHXLIIEWXWMHISJ;EWLMRKXSR7XVIIX
PEGOWMHI[EPOW
8LI[IWXWMHISJ4EPQ6S]EPI(VMZI
PEGOWWMHI[EPOW
-RXIVWIGXMSRWEVSYRHXLIWGLSSPPEGO
LMKLZMWMFMPMX]GVSWW[EPOW
%RI\MWXMRK'PEWW--FMOIPERISR4EPQ
6S]EPI(VMZIMWWPEXIHXSFIYTKVEHIH
XSE'PEWW--&&YJJIVIH&MOI0ERIMRXLI
RIEVJYXYVI
Figure 10: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 31 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
37 George Washington Charter School
George Washington Charter School has existing Class II bike lanes on Portola Avenue. There are also Class III bike route connections along Fairway Drive, Deep Canyon Road, and
Shadow Mountain Drive. Many streets in the neighborhood, however, lack sidewalks and curb ramps, such as along the north side of Chicory Street and Fairway Drive.

Many students are dropped off on the north side of
Chicory Street where there are no sidewalks.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 32 PALM DESERT
38 ;EWLMRKXSR'LEVXIV
7GLSSP4EVO
¥
())4'%2=326(
%0)77%2(63(6
7%2
09-7 6)= %:)
4%236%1%(6
)04%7)3
&0%'/ 6%&&-8 6(
436830%%:)
7,%(3; 0%/) (6 *%-6;%=(6
7,%(3;13928%-2(6
4)44)6+6%7778
1%66%/)7,(6
4%637)00%78
'%2(0);33(78 59%-0&697,%:)
'09&'-6
+6%4):-2)78
13928%-2:-);%:)
0%66)%78
',-'36=78
4%01()7)68(62
+%6()275
;,-8) 7832) 02
+ISVKI;EWLMRKXSR
'LEVXIV
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
+%47
+)36+)
;%7,-2+832',%68)6
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

&MG]GPI6SYXI
'PEWW---

HALF-MILE BUFFER
1ER]WXYHIRXW[EPOEPSRK7LEHS[
1SYRXEMR(VMZI[LMGLPEGOWWMHI[EPOW
XSGVSWWEXXLIWGLSSPGVSWW[EPO
%'PEWW--&MOI0ERII\MWXWSRP]SRXLI
[IWXWMHISJ4SVXSPE%ZIRYI 1ER]WXVIIXWRIEVXLIWGLSSPWYGLEW 'LMGSV]7XVIIXPEGOWMHI[EPOWSRSRI
SVFSXLWMHIWSJXLIWXVIIX
*EMV[E](VMZIMWETSTYPEVVSYXIJSV
TIHIWXVMERWFYXPEGOWWMHI[EPOW
Figure 11: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near George Washington Charter School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 33 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
39 Gerald R. Ford Elementary School
Gerald R. Ford Elementary School generally lacks bicycle connections. Warner Trail is relatively well-used by bicyclists but lacks bicycle facilities and signage. Fred Waring Drive, a busy thoroughfare just north of the school, has posted signage forbidding bicycles on the street and sidewalk.

Sidewalk connectivity to the school is good, but the residential neighborhoods on the east side of Warner Trail lack sidewalks.

There are no bicycle facilities near Gerald R. Ford Elementary School and bikes are forbidden on some sidewalks.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 34 PALM DESERT
40 %:)2-(% %0-'%28)
0-7&32 ;%=
'%00) 0%7 &6-7%7 7
*036-(%%:)
'%00) 0%7 &6
7%7 - ;
63&-26(
8)<%7%:)
+IVEPH6*SVH
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
+%47
+)6%0(6*36(
)0)1)28%6=
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
'MX]&SYRHEV]
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

&MG]GPI6SYXI
'PEWW---

HALF-MILE BUFFER
%'PEWW--&MOI0ERIEPSRK1MPIW
%ZIRYIXYVRWMRXSE'PEWW---&MOI6SYXI
SRXLIRSVXLWMHISJXLIWXVIIXFIX[IIR
;EVRIV8VEMPERH)POLSVR8VEMP
1ER]FMG]GPMWXWYWI;EVRIV8VEMP[LMGL
PEGOWFMG]GPIJEGMPMXMIW8LI[IWXWMHI
SJ;EVRIV8VEMPPEGOWWMHI[EPOW
*VIH;EVMRK(VMZIMWEFYW]QYPXMPERI
XLSVSYKLJEVI4SWXIHWMKREKIJSVFMHW
FMG]GPIWSRXLIWXVIIXERHWMHI[EPO
8LMWWIKQIRXSJ*VIH;EVMRK(VMZI
PEGOWWMHI[EPOWERHFMOIJEGMPMXMIWSR
FSXLWMHIWSJXLIWXVIIX
Figure 12: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Gerald R. Ford Elementary School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 35 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
41 James Earl Carter Elementary School
James Carter Elementary School has existing Class II bike lanes on Portola Avenue, though there are no facilities on Hovley Lane along the north side of the school. However, the school has very good sidewalk connectivity, with sidewalks present along all nearby streets. Students can also walk along a pedestrian path within Hovley Soccer Park to access neighborhoods to the south and avoid the busier industrial and commercial areas to the east.

Many students on bikes, scooters, and other forms of rolling mobility use sidewalks since there are no bike lanes on Hovley Lane.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 36 PALM DESERT
42 ,SZPI]
7SGGIV4EVO
>-6'32 '-6 )
:)6() ;%=
',%4%66%0(6
;-003; 0 %/) (6
'%1-23%663=32
436830%%:)
,3:0)=02)
'%1-23 %663=3 7
'%1 23 - %663=3 40
59-'/7-0:)6(6 :-%%6)+-3
1)6'96=
'-6 )
>-6'32 '-6 ;
%2+)07'%146(
&3(-)6(
7988)67
1-00 6(
:-%:)2)>-%
7-)66%1%(6)2
%>96-8) '-6 )
7-)66%1%(6)7
1)6'96= '-6 ;
'36436%8);%=
'%1-7% 02
.EQIW)EVP'EVXIV
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
+%47
.%1)7)%60
'%68)6)0)1)28%6=
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

HALF-MILE BUFFER
-RXIVWIGXMSRWEVSYRHXLIWGLSSPPEGO
LMKLZMWMFMPMX]GVSWW[EPOW
There is a critical IEWX[IWXFMG]GPI
gap along Hovley Lane E, adjacent to
James Earl Carter Elementary and a
public park
Figure 13: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near James Earl Carter Elementary School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 37 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
43 Palm Desert High School
Palm Desert High School is well-connected to existing bicycle facilities. The CV Link Class I shared-use path runs along the north side of the school, and both Cook Street and Deep Canyon Road have Class II bike lanes. However, there are no bike connections along Fred Waring Drive or through
the neighborhood to the south side of the school. Sidewalk coverage is also good, with wide sidewalks leading to its main entrance (via Cook Street) and sidewalks providing pedestrian access to the school’s rear entrance via Phyllis Jackson Lane.

CV Link connects directly to Palm Desert High School.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 38 PALM DESERT
44 'SSO*MIPHW
7TSVXW'SQTPI\
*6)(;%6-2+(6
,-(()2 4%017 (6
())4'%2=326(
0%7-)66%(6
7%2 =7 -(63 '-6
'33/78
4,=00-7 .%'/732 02
'%00) 0%28%2%
4%7)31328)'-003
0)70-)%:)
+%6=%:)
7,)6=0 %:)
1377637)(6
4%01 0%/)
0%:)2()6;%=
*6)(71-8,;%=
4EPQ(IWIVX
,MKL
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
+%47
4%01()7)68,-+,
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
8VERWMX7XSTW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
'SEGLIPPE:EPPI]0MRO
'PEWW-

&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

&MG]GPI6SYXI
'PEWW---

HALF-MILE BUFFER
8LIIEWXWMHISJ'SSO7XVIIXPEGOW
WMHI[EPOW-RXIVWIGXMSRWEVSYRHXLI
WGLSSPPEGOLMKLZMWMFMPMX]GVSWW[EPOW
There is a QENSVIEWX[IWXbicycle
network gap EPSRK*VIH;EVMRg
(VMZI
Figure 14: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Palm Desert High School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 39 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
45 Ronald Reagan Elementary School
Ronald Reagan Elementary has Class II bike lanes
along Country Club Drive and Oasis Club Road.

There are also sidewalks present along all streets
leading to the school. Students can also walk through
Freedom Park to the school’s entrance and avoid
walking along the busier Country Club Drive.

Sidewalks are present on all streets near Reagan Elementary School and a Class II bike lane on Country Club Drive connects to the school.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 40 PALM DESERT
46 *VIIHSQ4EVO
6)7368)6 &0:(
&%6-2+832 (6
)%78;33(02
&6-7%(6
746-2+*-)0(02
0% '378% '-6
;
8)736-'8
86%:-73(6
30=14-' ;%=
2);'%780)(6
8%1%6-7/ 63
;
(6
1%032)'-6
&%6327'-6
;)78&633/'8
'%6-2(%'8
'39286='09&(6
)2*-)0( 02
7%;+6%77'-6
&%= ,-00
;%=
4)&&0) &)%','-6
3%7-7'09&(6
&%0897630'-6
6SREPH6IEKER
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
+%47
632%0(6)%+%2
)0)1)28%6=
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8948(-441
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
7GLSSPW
,EPJ1MPI&YJJIV
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
7GLSSP4EVGIPW
   2.1*8
&MG]GPI0ERI
'PEWW--

HALF-MILE BUFFER
-RXIVWIGXMSRWEVSYRHXLIWGLSSPPEGO
LMKLZMWMFMPMX]GVSWW[EPOW
The west leg of this
intersection lacks a
QEVOIHTIHIWXVMER
GVSWWMRK
Figure 15: Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Ronald Reagan Elementary School SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 41 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
47 A school-focused collision analysis is crucial
for understanding safety trends and identifying
areas of concern near each of the eight schools.

The data not only highlights high-risk locations,
but also provides insights into the types of
collisions that are most common in these areas,
helping to guide the development and selection
of appropriate recommendations included in
this SRTS Plan. This analysis of collision patterns
informed the development and prioritization
of interventions intended to reduce crashes,
particularly those involving vulnerable road users
like pedestrians and bicyclists.

SCHOOL AREA COLLISION

ANALYSIS
For the school area collision analysis, the Project
Team defined a half-mile radius around each
school, corresponding with the area targeted for
SRTS improvements in this Plan. Between 2013
and 2022, there were 566 total collisions across
the school buffer areas that involved bicycles,
pedestrians, or vehicles (shown in Figure 16;
lighter yellow symbology purposefully chosen for
lesser injury vehicle collisions to highlight nonmotorized collisions), with one collision being mapped twice due to its involvement of both a
pedestrian and a bicycle. Among these, about 9%
involved an active mode (22 or 4% pedestrianrelated collisions, and 35 or 6% bicycle-related collisions), and about 14% involved school-age
(age 5–18) children (80 collisions, all modes).

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 42 PALM DESERT
48 !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Palm Desert
Charter
Middle
Abraham
Lincoln
Elementary
Colonel
Mitchell
Paige Middle
George
Washington
Charter
Gerald
R. Ford
Elementary
James Earl
Carter Elementary
Palm
Desert
High
Ronald Reagan
Elementary
Ä111

COOK STREET

WARNER TRAIL

DE ANZAWAY

DEEP CANYON ROAD

EL PASEO

HOVLEY LANE

CALIFORNIA DRIVE

FAIRWAY DRIVE

MERLE DRIVE

FRED WARING DRIVE

TENNESSEE
AVENUE

HAYSTACK ROAD

CALIFORNIAAVENUE

ALESSANDRO DRIVE

COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE

KANSAS STREET

PORTOLA AVENUE

ECLECTIC STREET

TAMARISK ROW DRIVE

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE

ELDORADO DRIVE

COLLEGE
DRIVE

OASIS CLUB DRIVE

COLLISIONS IN

SCHOOL AREAS

CITY OF PALM DESERT

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Date saved: 4/24/2024. 0 0.25 0.5 MILES
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES
! Schools
Half Mile Radius from Schools
City Boundary
Parks

BICYCLE COLLISION SEVERITY
Killed or severly injured (3)
Lesser injury (32)

PEDESTRIAN COLLISION SEVERITY
Killed or severly injured (6)
Lesser injury (16)

VEHICLE COLLISION SEVERITY
Killed or severly injured (29)
Lesser injury (481)
Collision data is provided by TIMS and includes collisions from January 2013 through December 2022.

Lesser injuries include minor injuries and complaints of pain. !! !
!
!
!
!
!
Figure 16: Collisions within a Half-Mile Radius of the Schools (2013-2022) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 43 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
49 Figure 17 compares the severity of collisions
involving school-age children and all ages.

Results show that about 7% (38 collisions) of
all mode collisions resulted in a fatality or
serious injury (killed or seriously injured [KSI]),
while about 4% (3 collisions) of collisions
involving school-age children resulted in
KSI. Furthermore, within the school area, 16%
(9 collisions) of active mode collisions
resulted in KSI, and one of them involved
school-age children.

Figure 17: Collisions Involving School-age Children by Severity Level, Compared to All Ages – All Collisions (2013-2022) Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury
All Ages
School-age
Children
Complaint of Pain
4%
2% 5% 28% 65%
33% 63%
7–7:59 a.m. 2–2:59 p.m. 3–3:59 p.m.
16% 14% 18%
Most collisions involving school-age children
occurred during peak student dismissal and
arrival periods (14 or 18% between 3:00 PM
and 3:59 PM, 13 or 16% between 7:00 AM and
7:59 AM, and 11 or 14% between 2:00 PM and
2:59 PM), and most of the collision types were
rear-end collisions and broadside collisions.

Unsafe speed is the top primary collision factor for
collisions within a half-mile radius of the eight schools (36% of collisions involving school-age children,
34% of collisions involving all ages people).

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 44 PALM DESERT
50 As shown in Figure 16 about 33% of collisions
(184 collisions) occurred at an intersection within
school areas. Out of these collisions, 9% (16
collisions) resulted in a fatality or serious injury,
and 15% (27 collisions) involved an active mode
of all severities.

The five intersections with the highest number of
collisions involving pedestrians or bicyclists and
their corresponding schools are shown below:
» Highway 111 and San Luis Rey Avenue
(George Washington Charter)
•4 collisions, including 1 KSI
» Fred Waring Drive and Portola Avenue
(Lincoln Elementary/Palm Desert Charter
Middle)
•2 collisions, including 1 KSI
» Portola Avenue and Alessandro Drive
(George Washington Charter)
•2 collisions
» Fred Waring Drive and Deep Canyon Road
(Palm Desert High)
•2 collisions
» Portola Avenue and Fairway Drive
(George Washington Charter)
•2 collisions
The complete collision analysis is included in
Appendix A.
33%
of collisions occurred
at an intersection
within school areas
15%
involved an
active mode
9%
resulted in a fatality
or serious injury
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 45 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
51 As part of the SRTS Plan, the Project Team
developed a high-injury network (HIN). HINs
illustrate that often a small number of improvable
roadways can address the majority of injurycausing crashes. Complementing the school-area collision analysis, an HIN allows for a better
understanding of the types of roadways in the city
where users are most at risk.

Crash data inclusive of all travel modes between
2013-2022 was analyzed to prioritize streets
with the most severe injuries, giving more weight
to serious crashes. Street segments with the most
severe crashes were then fed into the Project
Team’s custom-built HIN Generation tool, which
progressively added segments to the HIN until a
specific crash threshold was met. This approach
was utilized to identify the smallest portion of
the street network that accounted for the largest
number of serious crashes. The resulting HIN
is displayed in Figure 18. The complete HIN
analysis is included in Appendix B.

HIGH-INJURY NETWORK
43%
of collisions for all
modes occurred on
2%
of City roads.

California Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43)
AB 43 simplifies the process for jurisdictions to lower speed limits in designated safety corridors. These corridors include street segments that experience the highest number of serious and fatal collisions, as well as areas with high concentrations of pedestrians and bicyclists, particularly those from vulnerable groups like children and people with disabilities.

Developing a HIN is one approach to identifying such corridors. By utilizing the HIN included in this SRTS Plan, the City can leverage AB 43 to more easily reduce speed limits in these areas, improving safety for all road users.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 46 PALM DESERT
52 WASHINGTON STREET

PORTOLA AVENUE
Santa Rosa
Wildlife Area
Cook Fields
Sports Complex
Palm Desert Civic
Center Park
Magnesia Spring
Ecological Reserve
Three Golf Center at Palm Desert
Freedom Park
UC Deep Canyon
Natural Reserve
Hovley
Soccer Park
Santa Rosa and San Jacinto
Mountains National Monument
Ironwood Park
Cahuilla
Hills Park
Ä111
Ä74

MONTEREY AVENUE

COOK STREET

WARNER TRAIL

DE ANZAWAY

DEEP CANYON ROAD

EL PASEO

HOVLEY LANE

SHADOWMOUNTAIN DRIVE

FAIRWAY DRIVE

CAHUILLA WAY

FRED WARING DRIVE TENNESSEE AVENUE

RUTLEDGE WAY

COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
42ND AVENUE

MERLE DRIVE

HAYSTACK ROAD

PORTOLA AVENUE

A STREET

GERALD FORD DRIVE

TAMARISK ROWDRIVE

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE

DINAHSHORE DRIVE

ELDORADO DRIVE

DICK KELLY DRIVE

COLLEGE DRIVE

HIGH-INJURY NETWORK
(HIN)

CITY OF PALM DESERT

VISION ZERO
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Date saved: 3/21/2025.

DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES
City Boundary
Parks

HIN RESULTS
High-Injury Network

PORTOLA AVENUE

MONTEREY AVENUE

PARK VIEW DRIVE

SAN PASCUAL
AVENUE

ALESSANDRO
DRIVE

FRED WARING DRIVE

TOWN CENTER WAY

SAN PABLO AVENUE

SAN LUIS

REY AVENUE
Ä111
Ä74

DOWNTOWN AREA

DOWNTOWN AREA
0 1 2 MILES
The HIN accounts for 43% of injury and fatal collisions in Palm Desert.

Collisions are weighted by both severity and mode, with bicycle and pedestrian-involved collisions being weighted twice as high as motor vehicle-only collisions of the same severity. Data was obtained from TIMS and includes collisions from 2013-2022.

Figure 18: Palm Desert High-Injury Network
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 47 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
53 Outreach &
Engagement

03. 54

OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT

OVERVIEW
Engaging with the community is crucial for
developing a final plan that effectively addresses
key priorities. By involving parents and caregivers,
students, school staff, and other community
members, the Project Team ensures that the final
recommendations included in the SRTS Plan reflect
the unique needs, concerns, and aspirations
of those who are directly impacted. Effective
outreach provides valuable insight into the existing
challenges around school transportation, allowing
for the development of targeted and actionable
solutions that can enhance safety, accessibility,
and overall mobility for students and the wider
community.

Outreach was conducted in two phases. Phase I
occurred in spring 2023 and focused on listening
to community needs and concerns, including the
collection of existing conditions data. Phase II
occurred in fall 2024 and focused on gathering
community feedback on draft recommendations.

This comprehensive engagement strategy included
workshops, walk audits, pop-ups, virtual webinars,
and the establishment of an Advisory Committee
(Committee) to ensure diverse participation and
representation.

A project website was also created to disseminate
project information, promote events, and gather
feedback from those unable to participate in
in-person outreach activities. Activities were
advertised through project and event flyers,
direct mailers, social media posts, and the project
website. Upcoming SRTS events, such as the
school walk audits, were also highlighted at
community presentations. Promotional materials,
such as flyers, were created in English and
Spanish.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 49 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
55 SUMMARY OF

OUTREACH

ACTIVITIES
The following provides an overview of the types of
engagement events conducted. A comprehensive
Outreach and Engagement Report, offering
detailed descriptions of each individual event, is
included in Appendix C.

Palm Desert Advisory
Committee
As mentioned, the City established a Committee to
be a guiding body for the SRTS Plan development
process. Participants included representatives
from:
» City of Palm Desert
» City of Indian Wells
» City of La Quinta
» Coachella Valley Association of Governments
» Desert Recreation District
» Riverside County Sheriff’s Office
» The Joslyn Center
The Committee met three times over the course of
the project. Each meeting gave participants an
opportunity to learn about project activities, review
and provide feedback on project deliverables,
and inform project priorities. As a result, the
Committee helped the Project Team effectively
communicate with schools, identify priority
corridors for review, and keep project activities on
schedule.

School Walk Audits
Walk audits were conducted at each school
to assess traffic conditions and identify safety
issues. These audits were attended by school staff,
parents and caregivers, and community members,
and involved walking around the school grounds
to document road conditions, traffic patterns, and
safety concerns. The Project Team also conducted
school arrival and dismissal observations to collect
critical data on traffic behavior during rush-hour
periods.

Safe Routes to School
Student Travel Tallies
Student travel tallies were conducted to
understand how students travel to and from school.

Teachers administered surveys in classrooms,
collecting data on transportation modes, such as
walking, biking, or riding in a car. The tally results
highlighted the predominance of family vehicle
use, offering insights into how school-related traffic
congestion could be alleviated through improved
active transportation infrastructure.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 50 PALM DESERT
56 Safe Routes to School
Parent/Caregiver Surveys
Surveys were distributed to parents and caregivers
to gauge their attitudes and knowledge about
student travel habits. The surveys focused
on existing barriers to walking and biking to
school, such as safety concerns and travel
distances. Responses indicated that many
parents were concerned about traffic speeds,
unsafe intersections, and the lack of pedestrian
infrastructure.

School Community
Engagement
Various community events, including workshops
and virtual webinars, were held to engage the
school community. These sessions provided
information about the SRTS Plan and offered
participants an opportunity to provide feedback
on school-related safety concerns. Community
members showed strong support for efforts to
improve the safety of walking and biking routes for
students.

Community Engagement
In addition to school-focused engagement,
broader community input was gathered through
open houses and virtual workshops. These
sessions allowed residents to voice concerns
about pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure in
Palm Desert. Common themes included requests
for safer streets, additional sidewalks, better
crosswalks, and improvements to bike lanes. This
input helped refine the draft recommendations and
ensure that the final plan addressed the broader
community’s needs.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 51 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
57 SUMMARY OF

OUTREACH FINDINGS
The Project Team heard a wide range of input during
outreach and engagement activities, as summarized
in Table 5. Concerns focused largely on traffic safety, accessibility, and existing active transportation infrastructure gaps. Specifically, high traffic speeds, insufficient pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and road safety concerns around schools were consistently raised.

These insights, combined with input from the Committee, directly guided the development of SRTS recommendations presented in Chapter 4, ensuring they align with the
community’s concerns and needs.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 52 PALM DESERT
58 Table 5: Completed Outreach and Engagement Activities Phase Date Event Common Concerns/Findings
I
April – May 2024 School Walk Audits
» High speeds along nearby streets
» Traffic congestion during student arrival
and dismissal
» Drivers disobeying crossing guards
» Generally feeling unsafe bicycling
using existing facilities
April 8, 2024
Lincoln Elementary/Palm
Desert Charter Middle
School Workshop
» Sidewalk and bicycle network gaps
» High speeds on streets around schools
» ADA accessibility challenges on
neighborhood sidewalks
April 15, 2024 Safe Routes to School
Virtual Webinar » No concerns/findings received
May – June 2024 Safe Routes to School
Student Travel Tallies
» About 80% of students arrive at/depart
from school via a family vehicle
» About 4% of students walk to/from
school
» 0.2% of students bike to/from school
May – June 2024 Safe Routes to School
Parent/ Caregiver Surveys
» Speeding and too much traffic along
routes to school
» Unsafe intersections
» “Stranger danger”
II
October 15 and
October 17, 2024
City of Palm Desert Open
Houses
» High vehicular speeds and unsafe
pedestrian crossings
» More/expanded sidewalks and
improved maintenance
» More bicycle- and pedestrianfriendly roads throughout Palm Desert December 17, 2024
Safe Routes to School
Virtual Recommendations
Workshop
» Need hard medians to address drivers
cutting across lanes near Palm Desert
Middle School
» Extend the sidewalk recommendation
along Fairway Drive
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 53 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
59 Improving
Safe Routes
to School in
Palm Desert

04. 60
The recommendations presented in this chapter are
the result of extensive review of existing conditions
data, walk audits, and community feedback to
understand mobility challenges around each of
the eight public elementary, middle, and high
schools in Palm Desert, Indian Wells, and La
Quinta. This work culminated in infrastructure
recommendations that, once implemented, will
support access to safe, convenient, and healthy
modes of transportation for students, families, and
residents.

The infrastructure recommendations developed
for each school in this SRTS Plan are physical
design solutions that have been tailored to
existing infrastructure conditions around each
school. These considerations included right-of
way, road width, intersection geometry, and

RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEW
crosswalk orientation. The recommendations
also include supporting infrastructure, such as
leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) and wayfinding
signage, to complement physical design
solutions. Countdown pedestrian signals are also
recommended at all traffic-controlled intersections
where they are not already in place, as well as at
all future traffic signal installations.

Finally, all recommendations, when implemented,
will need to be consistent with local, state, and
federal guidelines, such as the California Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD),
to ensure regulatory compliance and uniformity in
traffic control measures.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 55 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
61 Different types of bicycle facilities are better suited for different roadways, based on considerations
such as vehicle speeds and volumes, the roadway
width, and other types of transportation using the
space. It is important to note that some facilities
promote both bicycle and pedestrian use.

BICYCLE FACILITY TYPES
Bicycle Facilities
Considered
Class I Bike Path
Class I bike paths are off-street facilities located in a separate right-of-way from the roadway and for
the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians.

Class II Bike Lane
Class II bike lanes are on-street facilities dedicated
to bicycles and identified with lane striping and
pole signs. They may also feature green paint
backing.

Class II buffered bike lanes are further separated
from vehicular lanes and/or parking lanes by
buffers indicated with two- to three-foot diagonal
painted striping.

The following section displays the bicycle facilities
that were considered in the development of the
SRTS recommendations. After consulting with
the City and the Committee, and analyzing
feasibility, only Class II bike lane facilities
were ultimately included in the SRTS
recommendations. Nevertheless, all bike facility
types are displayed here for reference.

In Palm Desert, golf carts are also
allowed to travel in the bike lane.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 56 PALM DESERT
62 Class III Bike Route
Class III facilities are on-street bike routes shared
with motorists. They lack a dedicated striped lane,
are identified with bike route signs, and often
include the shared use marking, also known as a
sharrow, and green paint.

Class IV Protected Bike Lane
Also called a cycle track or a separated bikeway,
Class IV facilities are separated from traffic by
a vertical barrier, such as a curb, median, or
bollards.

Class IV facilities are most helpful on streets with
high traffic volume.

In Palm Desert, golf carts are also
allowed to travel in protected bike lanes.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 57 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
63 Different types of pedestrian facilities are better suited for different roadways and roadway conditions. The following pedestrian facilities are included in the SRTS recommendations:

PEDESTRIAN FACILITY TYPES
Pedestrian Facilities
Considered
Curb Extension
Curb extensions provide more protected space
for people to cross the roadway and tend to
cause vehicles to slow. Flexible posts or paint are
sometimes used instead of physical curbs.

Curb Ramp
Curb ramps improve accessibility and transition
pedestrians from the street to the sidewalk.

High Visibility Crosswalk*
High visibility crosswalks clearly delineate the
right-of-way for those crossing the street.
*Some of the high visibility crosswalk recommendations
included in this SRTS Plan were recently installed
during a separate effort by the City. These
recommendations have been identified in the SRTS
concept plans with an asterisk.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 58 PALM DESERT
64 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
(RRFB)
Rectangular rapid flashing beacons alert drivers to
the presence of pedestrians.

Sidewalk Gap Closure
Sidewalk gap closures improve pedestrian
connections making it easier, safer, and more
comfortable to choose walking.

Traffic Calming Median*
Traffic calming medians cause vehicles to slow
down without changing the speed limit.
*When considering the installation of any median
recommended in this SRTS Plan, the City will
thoroughly review and determine precise
measurements to ensure it will not impede traffic flow.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 59 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
65 To ensure an enjoyable trip from beginning to end,
supporting infrastructure, such as pedestrian-scale
lighting and wayfinding, may be needed to make
walking and biking easier and more convenient.

Intersection Enhancements
A pedestrian and bicycle network is not complete
without considering how people cross challenging
intersections and reduce conflicts between people
driving, walking, and biking. New treatments, such
as stop signs and yield markings for drivers, can
be added to retrofit intersections to better serve
walking and bicycling across or through busy
intersections.

Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI)
A leading pedestrian interval (LPI) gives
pedestrians the opportunity to enter a crosswalk a
few seconds before the corresponding vehicular
traffic signal turns green. This allows pedestrians
to establish their presence in the crosswalk before
drivers are given the right to turn left or right.

Pedestrian-Scale Lighting
Pedestrian-scale lighting provides illumination
of walking areas by installing well-spaced lamp
posts at a low height. Pedestrian-scale lighting
increases pedestrian visibility to drivers and
bicyclists, increases pedestrian comfort and
perceived sense of safety, and creates an inviting
and vibrant streetscape for those walking and
biking throughout the city.

SUPPORTING

INFRASTRUCTURE
Bike Parking
Providing a secure place to store bikes at a
destination is an important part of making bike
trips feasible. Bike parking can include both longand short-term options and can be designed using different configurations that match the environment
and aesthetics of the community.

Streetscape Amenities
Streetscape amenities like shade structures,
benches, parklets, public art, and pedestrian
signals can contribute to a safer, more inviting,
and more pedestrian-oriented community. These
elements can greatly activate the sidewalks at
popular destinations.

Wayfinding
Providing wayfinding signs for pedestrians and
bicyclists that direct them to nearby destinations on
a route, such as schools and parks, is an important
element to any pedestrian and bicycle network.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 60 PALM DESERT
66 Intersection Daylighting
(Red Curb Parking
Restriction)
Intersection daylighting prohibits parking along
the curb approaching an intersection to increase
visibility for all road users and improve crossings.

This can be indicated by red paint and no-parking
signs, and it could include a curb extension. In a
school zone context, "no stopping" signage can
be used to reinforce the restriction, helping ensure
that vehicles do not obstruct visibility and safe
crossing for pedestrians, particularly students.

In October 2023, the Daylighting Saves Lives Bill
(AB 413) was signed into law. The law created a
new section of the California Vehicle Code, CVC
22500(n), which makes it illegal to park within
20 feet of the vehicle approach of any marked
or unmarked crosswalk, even if a red curb is not
present, or 15 feet of any crosswalk where a curb
extension is present.

As of January 1, 2025, local jurisdictions may
begin issuing citations, whether or not signs or
paint are present. The law’s purpose is to increase
visibility and reduce potentially lethal collisions.

Adding red curbs can help implement this law.

Bus Pullout Area
A bus pullout area is a designated section of the
roadway where buses can pull into to pick up or
drop off passengers without disrupting the flow
of traffic. Bus pullout areas also provide a safer
location for passengers to board and alight from
the bus at the sidewalk.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 61 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
67 The following pages present the participating
schools’ recommendations based on the existing
conditions analysis, walk audits, and community
feedback. Also included are walk audit summaries
that outline participants’ main concerns regarding
pedestrian and bicyclist safety around each
school. Walk audit participants included school
and school district staff, parents and caregivers,
City of Palm Desert and La Quinta staffs, and the
Project Team.

PALM DESERT SAFE ROUTES

TO SCHOOL INFRASTRUCTURE

RECOMMENDATIONS
Participating schools’ recommendations can be
found on the following pages:
» Abraham Lincoln Elementary School
and Palm Desert Charter Middle School:
pg. 64
» Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School:
pg. 76
» George Washington Charter School:
pg. 84
» Gerald R. Ford Elementary School:
pg. 100
» James Earl Carter Elementary School:
pg. 108
» Palm Desert High School: pg. 116
» Ronald Reagan Elementary School:
pg. 138
Feasibility of Improvement Recommendations
This is a planning document, providing a high-level blueprint to guide future bicycle and pedestrian improvements throughout Palm Desert. This Plan shows the recommended, proposed projects and an implementation plan with funding opportunities.

Each project in this Plan will require more detailed project-level analysis, community engagement, and engineering study. As the City proceeds with more detailed projectlevel planning, some projects identified in this Plan may require refinement.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 62 PALM DESERT
68 SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 63 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
69 Walk Audit Summary | Abraham Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Audit Date: Tuesday, April 9, 2024
Audit Time: 2:00 - 3:00 PM
Enrollment: 585 Students (Lincoln ES);
1,347 Students (PDCMS)
District: Desert Sands Unified School District
Participants: 19
Key issues identified during the walk audit:
» Portola Avenue is a major concern
due to high vehicular speeds, regular traffic
congestion, and erratic driver behavior when
navigating around school-related traffic.

Participants stated they avoid walking along
Portola Avenue.
» One participant requested more school
signage along Portola Avenue, particularly for
northbound traffic.
» Some participants stated they would like
to make use of the nearby CV Link bike path,
but connecting bicycle facilities are needed.
» Drivers do not stop at stop signs and
speeding occurs along the wider streets in the
residential neighborhood to the south.
» One parent stated it feels stressful crossing
at Rutledge Way and Santolina Drive when
the crossing guard is not present due to cars
not stopping.

Afternoon pick-up at Lincoln Elementary
School.

Drivers made illegal turns into Lincoln
Elementary School’s parking lot to navigate
around waiting cars.

Palm Desert Charter Middle School does
dispersed drop-off and pick-up, with the
primary drop-off and pick-up location at the
Magnesia Falls Park parking lot.

Standard and high visibility crosswalks and
bike sharrows at Rutledge Way and Santolina
Drive.

Lincoln Elementary School Address: 74-100 Rutledge Way, Palm Desert Palm Desert Charter Middle School Address: 74-200 Rutledge Way, Palm Desert SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 64 PALM DESERT
70 Study Area | Abraham Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Magnesia Falls
City Park

DEEP CANYON RD

PRIMROSE DR

DESERT STAR BLVD

RUTLEDGE WAY

BUTTONWOOD DR

MYRSINE AVE

RANCHO RD

SANTOLINA DR

CARMELCIR

BU E NA CIR

IA FALLS DR

ERIN ST

ASTER DR
G AVE

FRED WARING DR

VELARDO DR

MARIGOLD D
R

GOLETA AVE

PRIVATE ST
Palm Desert
Charter Middle
Abraham Lincoln
Elementary
AN GAPS:

MIDDLE
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Transit Stops
Half-Mile Buffer
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Coachella Valley Link (Class I)
Bicycle Lane (Class II) Bicycle
Route (Class III)
Desert Star Boulevard, an important
east-west pedestrian connection, lacks
sidewalks.
sting Class III
s were recently
edge Way.
4EPQ(IWIVX'MZMG
'IRXIV4EVO
1EKRIWME*EPPW
'MX]4EVO
())4'%2=326(
46-1637) (6
+%6=%:)
59-'/7-0:)6(6
7988)67 1-00 6(
()7)68 78%6 &0:(
6980)(+);%=
&98832;33((6
7%24%7'9%0%:)
>-6'32 '-6 ;
1=67-2) %:)
436830%%:)
6%2',36(
7%2830-2%(6
1)6'96= '-6 ;
'%61)0'-6
&9 ) 2% '-6
1%+2)7-%*%007(6
1)6'96= ' 6- )
)6-278
%78)6 (6
/69+%:)
*6)(;%6-2+(6
'%1-23%663=37
:)0%6(3 (6
1%6-+30( (6
+30)8%%:)
46-:%8)6(
46-:%8)78
4EPQ(IWIVX
'LEVXIV1MHHPI
%FVELEQ0MRGSPR
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2+%47

()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 65 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
71 Figure 19: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (1/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 66 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 2
2 Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI) on All Legs*
Proposed Center Median
1 2
3 3
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
13 13
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick
Up/Drop Off
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
*Keep in free operation during school
AM and PM peak hours

MAGNESIA FALLS DR

PORTOLA AVE
Matchline - See Sheet 67
Matchline - See Sheet 73
72 Figure 20: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (2/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 67 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 3
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Center Median
Match Exisitng Median
Preserve Left Turn Lane with
No U-Turn Signage
2 3
12 14
12 14
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

MAGNESIA FALLS DR

PARK PL

VIA RENGO
Matchline - See Sheet 66
Matchline - See Sheet 68
73 Figure 21: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (3/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 68 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 3
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Center Median
2 3
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

RUTLEDGE WAY

MAGNESIA FALLS DR
Matchline - See Sheet 69
Matchline - See Sheet 67
74 Figure 22: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (4/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 69 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 5
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Red Curb with No
Stopping/Standing Signage
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
2 5
6 11
6 11
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
13 15
13 Proposed Shade Structure for Pick
Up/Drop Off
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’ 15
Proposed Yield Markings and Sign SW24-2(CA)

SANTOLINA DR

RUTLEDGE WAY
Matchline - See Sheet 70
Matchline - See Sheet 68
75 Figure 23: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (5/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 70 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 5
7 6
4 6 Proposed Red Curb
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Sidewalk
2 4
5 7
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

RUTLEDGE WAY

DESERT STAR BLVD

MYRSINE AVE
12 Proposed Stop Markings and Sign
12 Matchline - See Sheet 69
Matchline - See Sheet 71
76 Figure 24: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (6/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 71 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
2 2
2 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

RUTLEDGE WAY
Matchline - See Sheet 72
Matchline - See Sheet 70
77 Figure 25: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (7/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 72 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 2
4 3
3 Proposed Center Median
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI) on All Legs*
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
*Keep in free operation during
school AM and PM peak hours
1 2 4 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

RUTLEDGE WAY

PORTOLA AVE
Matchline - See Sheet 74
Matchline - See Sheet 71
Matchline - See Sheet 73
78 Figure 26: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (8/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 73 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 3
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Center Median
2 3
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PORTOLA AVE
Matchline - See Sheet 72
Matchline - See Sheet 66
79 Figure 27: Abraham Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School Concept Plans (9/9) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 74 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
11 5
7 10
7 Proposed Sidewalk
Lincoln Elementary and PDCMS
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps Proposed Curb Extension with
Delineator Posts
5 10
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
11 *Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

DESERT STAR BLVD

PORTOLA AVEASTER DRVELARDO DR
Matchline - See Sheet 72
80 This page intentionally left blank
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 75 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
81 Enrollment: 436 Students
District: Desert Sands Unified School
District
Participants: 4
Key issues identified during the walk
audit:
» Some drivers conducted illegal
U-turns on Palm Royale Drive after
dropping off students at the curb.
» Drivers dropping off students
along the curb on Palm Royale Drive
near the school’s parking lot exit
create sightline obstructions for those
exiting.
» The sidewalk along the frontage
of the school ends at a sand lot. There
are also no sidewalks on the north
side of Fred Waring Drive west of Palm
Royale Drive and on the east side
of Washington Street north of Fred
Waring Drive.

Walk Audit Summary | Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School* Audit Date: Wednesday, May 1, 2024
Audit Time: 8:30 - 9:30 AM
Main entrance and student drop-off and pickup lanes.

Cars dropping off students along the curb
create sightline obstructions for drivers exiting
the school’s parking lot.
*Recommendations for this school are in the City of La Quinta’s right-of-way and therefore will require review, coordination, and implementation by La Quinta.

Crosswalk with rectangular rapid flashing
beacons (RRFBs) in front of the school on Palm
Royale Drive.

School Address: 43-495 Palm Royale Drive, La Quinta
Some drivers performed illegal U-turns after
dropping off their students on Palm Royale
Drive.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 76 PALM DESERT
82 Study Area | Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School

CALLE LAS BRISAS S
NTE

ISBON WAY

TUCSON CIR
Colonel Mitchell
Paige Middle
STRIAN
LE
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Transit Stops
Half-Mile Buffer
City Boundary
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Bicycle Lane (Class II)
ed Waring Drive
Washington Street
walks.

The west side of Palm Royale Drive
lacks sidewalks.
'%00) 0%7 &6-7%7 7
%:)2-(% %0-'%28)
0-7&32 ;%=
()0%;%6)40
89'732'-6
13928%-2:-);
'SPSRIP1MXGLIPP
4EMKI1MHHPI
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 77 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
City of La Quinta
83 Figure 28: Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School Concept Plans (1/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 78 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 3
4 Colonel Mitchell Middle School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
1 13
4 6
6 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting - Conduct
Illumination Study to Install Pedestrian Scale Lighting *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian Interval
(LPI) on All Legs

PALM ROYALE DR

WASHINGTON ST
Matchline - See Sheet 79
84 Figure 29: Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School Concept Plans (2/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 79 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Matchline - See Sheet 80 3 Colonel Mitchell Middle School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
3 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PALM ROYALE DR

PRIVATE DR
Matchline - See Sheet 78
85 Figure 30: Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School Concept Plans (3/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 80 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 79
Matchline - See Sheet 81

PALM ROYALE DR

DARBY RD
Colonel Mitchell Middle School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
3 3
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
86 Figure 31: Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School Concept Plans (4/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 81 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 80
Matchline - See Sheet 82
Colonel Mitchell Middle School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick Up/
Drop Off
5 5
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PALM ROYALE DR
87 Figure 32: Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School Concept Plans (5/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 82 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 81
3 Colonel Mitchell Middle School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
3 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
Proposed Sidewalk - Colonel Mitchel
Paige Middle School to Fred Waring Dr
2 2
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick Up/
Drop Off
5 5
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PALM ROYALE DR
88 Figure 33: Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School Concept Plans (6/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 83 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Colonel Mitchell Middle School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High Visibility*
Proposed Sidewalk
1 1
12 2
3 3
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting - Conduct
Illumination Study to Install Pedestrian Scale Lighting *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
6 6
Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian Interval
(LPI) on All Legs

FRED WARING DR

PALM ROYALE DR
89 Enrollment: 755 Students
District: Desert Sands Unified School
District
Participants: 6
Key issues identified during the walk audit:
» Many streets near the school lack
sidewalks. Participants specifically
requested sidewalks along Fairway Drive.
» Many families cross Chicory Street
midblock due to no sidewalks along the
north side of the street leading to the
crosswalk at Chicory Street and Shadow
Mountain Drive.
» Participants feel uncomfortable
walking along Portola Avenue due to high
vehicular speeds and narrow sidewalks,
especially near Portola Avenue and
Fairway Drive.
» During drop-off and pick-up,
congestion spills out of the parking lot
into Chicory Street and Portola Avenue.

Drivers also idle along the red curb on
Portola Avenue even when Chicory Street
is free of traffic.

Walk Audit Summary | George Washington Charter School
Audit Date: Tuesday, April 30, 2024
Audit Time: 8:30 - 9:30 AM
A crossing guard assists with morning dropoff at the crosswalk at Chicory Street and Shadow Mountain Drive.

Narrow sidewalks along Portola Avenue,
a high-speed arterial, foster an unpleasant
walking environment.

Drivers parked along a red curb on Portola
Avenue waiting to drop off students.

Parents and students were seen crossing
midblock along Chicory Street.

School Address: 45-768 Portola Avenue, Palm Desert
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 84 PALM DESERT
90 Study Area | George Washington Charter School
Washington Charter
School Park

DEEP CANYON RD

BLACK RABBIT
RD

PORTOLA AVE
AKE DR

FAIRWAY DR

PEPPERGRASS ST

MARRAKESH DR

PAROSELLA ST

QUAILBRUSH AVE

CLUB CIR

GRAPEVINE ST

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE

CHICORY ST

WHITE STONE LN
George Washington
Charter
STRIAN
RTER
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Transit Stops
Half-Mile Buffer
City Boundary
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Bicycle Lane (Class II)
Bicycle Route (Class III)
ts only on the
a Avenue. Many streets near the school, such as
Chicory Street, lack sidewalks on one
or both sides of the street.

Fairway Drive is a popular route for
pedestrians but lacks sidewalks.
;EWLMRKXSR'LEVXIV
7GLSSP4EVO
¥
())4'%2=326(
%0)77%2(63(6
7%2
09-7 6)= %:)
4%236%1%(6
)04%7)3
&0%'/ 6%&&-8 6(
436830%%:)
7,%(3; 0%/) (6 *%-6;%=(6
7,%(3;13928%-2(6
4)44)6+6%7778
1%66%/)7,(6
4%637)00%78
'%2(0);33(78 59%-0&697,%:)
'09&'-6
+6%4):-2)78
13928%-2:-);%:)
0%66)%78
',-'36=78
4%01()7)68(62
+%6()275
;,-8) 7832) 02
+ISVKI;EWLMRKXSR
'LEVXIV
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 85 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
91 Figure 34: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (1/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 86 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 92
4 5
3 2
2 10
4 George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Bike Lane
2 Conduct Sidewalk Expansion
3 5
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
10 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FAIRWAY DR

PORTOLA AVE
Matchline - See Sheet 88
Matchline - See Sheet 87
92 Figure 35: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (2/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 87 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
10 2
3 4
6 4
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Bike Lane
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
2 2
3 6
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick Up/
Drop Off
10 11
11 11
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

CHICORY ST

PORTOLA AVE
Matchline - See Sheet 86
Matchline - See Sheet 89
93 Figure 36: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (3/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 88 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 86
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
2 Proposed Sidewalk
2 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FAIRWAY DR
Matchline - See Sheet 95
94 Figure 37: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (4/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 89 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 90
10 Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Bike Lane
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Red Curb
3 3
2 2
2 7
7 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
10 *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

SHADOW MOUNTAIN DR

PORTOLA AVE
Matchline - See Sheet 91
Matchline - See Sheet 93
Matchline - See Sheet 87
95 Figure 38: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (5/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 90 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
7 George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Red Curb
1 1
7 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility Using City’s Approved
Crosswalk Treatment*
10 10
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

EL PASEO

PORTOLA AVE

LARREA ST
Matchline - See Sheet 89
96 Figure 39: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (6/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 91 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
2 Proposed Sidewalk
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

SHADOW MOUNTAIN DR
Matchline - See Sheet 89
97 Figure 40: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (7/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 92 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
8 8
1 1
2 2
9 9
7 8 Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Red Curb
Conduct Warrant Analysis for
All-Way Stop Control
1 2
7 9
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE

FAIRWAY DR

SHADOW LAKE DR
Matchline - See Sheet 86
98 Figure 41: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (8/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 93 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
8 1
10 7
2 2
2 4
7 Proposed Red Curb
7 George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Sidewalk Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
1 1
2 4
8 8
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting - 10
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
0’ 30’ 60’

SHADOW MOUNTAIN DR
Scale: 1”=60’

CANDLEWOOD ST

CHICORY ST
Matchline - See Sheet 89
Matchline - See Sheet 94
99 Figure 42: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (9/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 94 PALM DESERT
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Red Curb
10 2
2 7
7 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
10 *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

LANTANA AVE

PAROSELLA ST
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Matchline - See Sheet 95 Matchline - See Sheet 93
100
Figure 43: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (10/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 95 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Sidewalk
Proposed Red Curb
1 1
1 2
2 2
7 7
7 7
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
10 10
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 8 Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
8 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PEPPERGRASS ST

LANTANA AVE

BLACK RABBIT RD

FAIRWAY DR
Matchline - See Sheet 94
Matchline - See Sheet 88
Matchline - See Sheet 96
101
Figure 44: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (11/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 96 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Sidewalk
1 1 1
2 2
8 Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
8 8
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
7 Proposed Red Curb
7 7ABRONIA TRAIL

QUAILBRUSH AVE

FAIRWAY DR
Matchline - See Sheet 95
Matchline - See Sheet 97
102
Figure 45: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (12/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 97 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
2 Proposed Sidewalk
2 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FAIRWAY DR
Matchline - See Sheet 96
Matchline - See Sheet 98
103
Figure 46: George Washington Charter School Concept Plans (13/13) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 98 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
George Washington Charter
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Sidewalk
1 1 1
2 2
2 8 Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
8 8
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
7 Proposed Red Curb
7 7
7 DEEP CANYON RD

PANORAMA DR

FAIRWAY DR
Matchline - See Sheet 97
104
This page intentionally left blank
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 99 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
105
Enrollment: 603 Students
District: Desert Sands Unified School District
Participants: 5
Key issues identified during the walk audit:
» The principal would like the existing
crosswalk on Warner Trail and Evening Star
Circle removed or upgraded to a raised
crosswalk with RRFBs or pedestrian hybrid
beacons. He stated it is currently difficult for
students to use due to speeding drivers along
Warner Trail.
» The existing bus stop location on Fred
Waring Drive east of Warner Trail creates a
challenging situation when buses stop in the
travel lane to load/unload. Cars turning right
onto Fred Waring Drive quickly speed up to
match traffic speeds unaware that a bus is
stopped in the lane they are turning into and
must quickly change lanes or brake.
» Posted signage indicates bicycles are
banned on sidewalks along Fred Waring
Drive. Traffic speeds and volumes create
stressful conditions for on-street bicyclists.
» Sidewalks terminate on Fred Waring
Drive just east of the school.

Walk Audit Summary | Gerald R. Ford Elementary School*
Audit Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2024
Audit Time: 9:00 - 10:00 AM
Bicycles are banned from using sidewalks
near the school.

The school has one crossing guard that assists
with pedestrian crossing in the school’s main
parking lot.

A high visibility crosswalk in front of the school provides pedestrian access to neighborhoods to the west.

School Address: 44-210 Warner Trail, Indian Wells
*Recommendations for this school are in the City of Indian Wells’ right-of-way and therefore will require review, coordination, and implementation by Indian Wells.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 100 PALM DESERT
106
Study Area | Gerald R. Ford Elementary School
Gerald R. Ford
Elementary
STRIAN
ORD
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Transit Stops
Half-Mile Buffer
City Boundary
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Bicycle Lane (Class II)
Bicycle Route (Class III)
A Class II Bike Lane along Miles
Avenue turns into a Class III Bike Route
on the north side of the street between
Warner Trail and Elkhorn Trail.
ner Trail, which
The west side
sidewalks.

Fred Waring Drive is a busy, multi-lane
thoroughfare. Posted signage forbids
bicycles on the street and sidewalk.
%:)2-(% %0-'%28)
0-7&32 ;%=
'%00) 0%7 &6-7%7 7
*036-(%%:)
'%00) 0%7 &6 7- %7
;
63&-26(
8)<%7%:)
+IVEPH6*SVH
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 101 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
City of Indian Wells
107
Figure 47: Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Concept Plans (1/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 102 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 3
2 4
5 4
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Red Curb Proposed Sidewalk
1 2
3 5
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

CHEYENNE DR

WARNER TRAIL
Matchline - See Sheet 103
108
Figure 48: Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Concept Plans (2/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 103 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 3
2 4
5 4
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Red Curb Proposed Sidewalk
1 2
3 5
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

BLACKFOOT DR

WARNER TRAIL
Matchline - See Sheet 102
Matchline - See Sheet 104
109
Figure 49: Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Concept Plans (3/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 104 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
9 3
2 4
6 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
4 9
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Red Curb
Proposed Rectangular Rapid Flashing
Beacon (RRFB)
2 2
3 6
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
10 11
11 10
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick
Up/Drop Off
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick Up/
Drop Off
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

EVENING STAR CIR

WARNER TRAIL
Matchline - See Sheet 103
Matchline - See Sheet 105
110
Figure 50: Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Concept Plans (4/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 105 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
9 4
5 Proposed Sidewalk
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps Proposed Bus Pullout Area
2 2
2 4
7 7
7 5
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
9 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City
** The Entrance to Gerald Ford Elementary School was Widened in Winter 2025. This Change is not Shown
in Current Aerial Imagery
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR

WARNER TRAIL
Matchline - See Sheet 104
111
Figure 51: Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Concept Plans (5/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 106 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
9 4
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
4 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
9 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR

ENT LAS BRISAS
112
Figure 52: Gerald R. Ford Elementary School Concept Plans (6/6) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 107 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
5 Proposed Sidewalk
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Red Curb
Conduct Warrant Analysis for
One-Way Stop Control
1 1
1 8
8 2
2 2
3 3 3
8 5
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR

FLORIDA AVE

EIKHORN TRAIL

OHIO CT
113
Enrollment: 516 Students
District: Desert Sands Unified School
District
Participants: 3
Key issues identified during the walk
audit:
» Portola Avenue is a major concern
due to speeding drivers. Little shade
makes it uncomfortable to walk along
sidewalks in hot weather.
» Some afternoon pick-up traffic
congestion spilled outside of the
school’s parking lot into turn lanes on
Hovley Lane.
» Drivers were parked along a red
curb on Hovley Lane until a motor
officer arrived.

Walk Audit Summary | James Earl Carter Elementary School Audit Date: Wednesday, April 17, 2024
Audit Time: 3:00 - 4:00 PM
Afternoon pick-up occurs in a single lane
within the school’s main parking lot.

Some afternoon pick-up congestion spilled
into Hovley Lane.

Traffic enforcement on Hovley Lane in front of
the school.

Hovley Lane and Portola Avenue is a major
intersection near the school.

School Address: 74-251 Hovley Lane East, Palm Desert
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 108 PALM DESERT
114
Study Area | James Earl Carter Elementary School
Hovley
Soccer Park

ZIRCON CIR
E
RAL DR
N

PORTOLA AVE

HOVLEY LN E
CAMINO

ARROYO S

QUICKSILVER DR VIA AREGIO

MERCURY
CIR E

ZIRCON CIR W

ANGELS CAMP RD

BODIE RD

SUTTERS

MILL RD

VIA VENEZIA

AZURITE CIR E

MERCURY CIR W

CORPORATE WAY
James Earl Carter
Elementary
STRIAN
L
ARY
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Half-Mile Buffer
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Bicycle Lane (Class II)
Intersections around the school lack
high visibility crosswalks.
,SZPI]
7SGGIV4EVO
>-6'32 '-6 )
:)6() ;%=
',%4%66%0(6
;-003; 0 %/) (6
'%1-23%663=32
436830%%:)
,3:0)=02)
'%1-23 %663=3 7
'%1 23 - %663=3 40
59-'/7-0:)6(6 :-%%6)+-3
1)6'96=
'-6 )
>-6'32 '-6 ;
%2+)07'%146(
&3(-)6(
7988)67
1-00 6(
:-%:)2)>-%
7-)66%1%(6)2
%>96-8) '-6 )
7-)66%1%(6)7
1)6'96= '-6 ;
'36436%8);%=
'%1-7% 02
.EQIW)EVP'EVXIV
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 109 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
115
Figure 53: James Earl Carter Elementary School Concept Plans (1/5) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 110 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
8 James Earl Carter Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
8 *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PORTOLA AVE

VIA VENEZIA

CHAPARRAL DR
116
Figure 54: James Earl Carter Elementary School Concept Plans (2/5) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 111 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
2 8
3 James Earl Carter Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI) on All Legs - Coordinate
with CV Sync Phase II
2 3
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
8 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

HOVLEY LN

PORTOLA AVE
117
Figure 55: James Earl Carter Elementary School Concept Plans (3/5) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 112 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
3 4
James Earl Carter Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick
Up/Drop Off
3 4
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

HOVLEY LN
118
Figure 56: James Earl Carter Elementary School Concept Plans (4/5) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 113 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
3 1
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
James Earl Carter Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
East to West Stop Sign Warrant /
Traffic Signal Warrant
1 5
5 3
6 6
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
9 Proposed Red Curb
9 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

HOVLEY LN

JASMINE CT
119
Figure 57: James Earl Carter Elementary School Concept Plans (5/5) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 114 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
James Earl Carter Elementary
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Potential Park and Walk/Walking
School Bus Stop
7 7
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

HOVLEY LN
120
This page intentionally left blank
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 115 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
121
Walk Audit Summary | Palm Desert High School*
Audit Date: Thursday, April 18, 2024
Audit Time: 8:30 - 9:30 AM
School Address: 74-910 Aztec Road, Palm Desert
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 116 PALM DESERT
Enrollment: 2,050 Students
District: Desert Sands Unified School
District
Participants: 6
Key issues identified during the walk audit:
» Drivers speed along Cook Street.

Northbound and southbound traffic
approach Aztec Lane on a decline,
fostering high-speed conditions around
the school.
» Drivers wait for students in the
northbound right-turn lane at Cook Street
and Aztec Lane rather than continuing
into the school’s parking lot. This results
in congestion and erratic maneuvers by
drivers trying to enter the parking lot.
» The school resource officer requested
bollards, gates, or a similar barrier
between the publicly accessible CV Link
bike path and the school’s rear parking
lot.

Morning drop-off occurs in three travel lanes
and one parking lane.

Speeding is a concern along Cook Street near
the entrance to the school.

The school resource officer requested a barrier
between the public CV Link bike path and the
school’s rear parking lot.

On-campus bike parking near the front of the
school.
*PDHS is developing a traffic circulation study. Recommendations from the circulation study should be coordinated with SRTS recommendations that pertain to PDHS. 122
Study Area | Palm Desert High School
Cook Fields
Sports Complex

FRED WARING DR

HIDDEN PALMS DR

LA SIERRA DR

SAN YS IDRO CIR
COO

PHYLLIS JACKSON LN

CALLE LANTAN
A

PASEO MONTECILLO

MOSS ROSE DR

PALM LAKE

FRED SMITH WAY
Palm Desert
High
STRIAN

RT HIGH
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Transit Stops
Half-Mile Buffer
City Boundary
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Coachella Valley Link (Class I)
Bicycle Lane (Class II)
Bicycle Route (Class III)
est bicycle
d Waring
'SSO*MIPHW
7TSVXW'SQTPI\
*6)(;%6-2+(6
,-(()2 4%017 (6
())4'%2=326(
0%7-)66%(6
7%2 =7 -(63 '-6
'33/78
4,=00-7 .%'/732 02
'%00) 0%28%2%
4%7)31328)'-003
0)70-)%:)
+%6=%:)
7,)6=0 %:)
1377637)(6
4%01 0%/)
0%:)2()6;%=
*6)(71-8,;%=
4EPQ(IWIVX
,MKL
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 117 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
123
Figure 58: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (1/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 118 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
2 4
4 2
14 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
14 *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 18 Proposed Center Median
18 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR

DEEP CANYON RD
Matchline - See Sheet 119
124
Figure 59: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (2/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 119 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
1 3
2 4
4 3
2 1
18 Proposed Center Median
18 18
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

VIA PALMIRA

DEEP CANYON RD
Matchline - See Sheet 118
Matchline - See Sheet 120
125
Figure 60: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (3/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 120 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
5 6
4 3
1 2
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
4 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
Proposed Stop Markings and Sign
1 Proposed Red Curb
2 3
6 5
18 Proposed Center Median
18 18
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

MCNELIS CIR

DEEP CANYON RD
Matchline - See Sheet 119
Matchline - See Sheet 121
126
Figure 61: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (4/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 121 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
4 3
2 14
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
4 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
Proposed Red Curb
2 2
2 3
6 6
5 5 5
6 Proposed Stop Markings and Sign
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
14 14
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
18 Proposed Center Median
18 18
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’ DAYLILY CIR

CORAL BELL CIR

BUTTONWOOD DR

DEEP CANYON RD
Matchline - See Sheet 120
Matchline - See Sheet 122
127
Figure 62: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (5/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 122 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1
3 2
4 7
5 Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
4 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
Match Existing Striping
Match Existing Median
Proposed Red Curb
1 2
3 7
16 19
19 16
16 5
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
18 Proposed Center Median
18 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

LAVENDAR WAY

DEEP CANYON RD

MAGNESIA FALLS DR
Matchline - See Sheet 121
Matchline - See Sheet 134
128
Figure 63: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (6/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 123 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Proposed Red Curb
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
5 7
2 1
5 2
7 14
1 14 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High Visibility*
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DRWARING COURT

PHYLLIS JACKSON LANE
Matchline - See Sheet 124
129
Figure 64: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (7/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 124 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
7 14
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 14 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High Visibility*
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PHYLLIS JACKSON LANE

FRED SMITH WAY
Matchline - See Sheet 123
Matchline - See Sheet 125
130
Figure 65: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (8/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 125 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
7 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PHYLLIS JACKSON LANE
Matchline - See Sheet 124
Matchline - See Sheet 126
131
Figure 66: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (9/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 126 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
7 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

PHYLLIS JACKSON LANE
Matchline - See Sheet 125
132
Figure 67: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (10/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 127 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI) on All Legs - Coordinate
with CV Sync Phase II
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Sidewalk Widening to 10’-12’
8 15
15 14 8
14 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High Visibility*
16 Match Existing Sidewalk
16 *Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR

COOK ST
Matchline - See Sheet 128
133
Figure 68: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (11/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 128 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
1 1
5 6
15 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Red Curb
1 5
6 Proposed Stop Markings and Sign
Match Existing Sidewalk
15 16
16 16
2 Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
2 Proposed Sidewalk Widening to 10’-12’
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

SANTA FE TRAIL

COOK ST

SAN SIMEON DRFRED SMITH WY
Matchline - See Sheet 129
Matchline - See Sheet 127
134
Figure 69: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (12/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 129 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 7
14 Upgrade to Leading Pedestrian
Interval (LPI) on All Legs - Coordinate
with CV Sync Phase II
8 8
14 Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High Visibility*
15 15
2 Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
2 16 Match Existing Sidewalk
16 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
Proposed Sidewalk Widening to 10’-12’
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

AZTEC ROAD

COOK ST
Matchline - See Sheet 128
Matchline - See Sheet 130
135
Figure 70: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (13/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 130 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Proposed Pick Up Lane
Proposed Passenger Loading Signage
(R25E) CA
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
1 9
17 17
7 7
9 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

COOK ST
Matchline - See Sheet 137
Matchline - See Sheet 129
136
Figure 71: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (14/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 131 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
1 2
2 1
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

HIDDEN PALMS DR

FRED WARING DR
137
Figure 72: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (15/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 132 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
1 2
2 1
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR

SAN YSIDRO CIRCLE
138
Figure 73: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (16/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 133 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed ADA Curb Ramps
1 1
2 2
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

FRED WARING DR
139
Figure 74: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (17/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 134 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 7
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

CV LINK
Matchline - See Sheet 122
Matchline - See Sheet 135
140
Figure 75: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (18/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 135 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
7 Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

CV LINK
Matchline - See Sheet 134
Matchline - See Sheet 136
141
Figure 76: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (19/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 136 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Matchline - See Sheet 135
Proposed Bike Racks
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Swing Gate
Proposed Wayfinding Signage to
PDHS and Lincoln Elementary
7 7
12 12
11 11
13 13
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

CV LINK

PHYLLIS JACKSON LANE
Matchline - See Sheet 137
142
Figure 77: Palm Desert High School Concept Plans (20/20) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 137 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Desert High School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
7 7
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

CV LINK
Matchline - See Sheet 130
Matchline - See Sheet 136
143
Enrollment: 834 Students
District: Desert Sands Unified School
District
Participants: 4
Key issues identified during the walk audit:
» Participants stated that the main issue
is the conflict point at the entrance to the
school’s parking lot next to the residential
roundabout. The assistant principal
stated students walking from the adjacent
residential complex must navigate through
large vehicles and heavy traffic while
crossing onto school property.
» The assistant principal stated park
visitors speed through the parking lot that
is shared with the school and Freedom
Park.
» During drop-off and pick-up, traffic
often backs up along Liberty Drive and
into Country Club Drive, a high-speed
arterial. This is worsened by cars parked
along the curb on Liberty Drive, which is
legally permitted.

Walk Audit Summary | Ronald Reagan Elementary School
Audit Date: Thursday, May 2, 2024
Audit Time: 8:00 - 9:00 AM
Morning drop-off at the front of the school. Morning drop-off congestion spills into Liberty Drive.

Students walking from the neighboring residential community must navigate around many cars to enter campus.

School Address: 39-800 Liberty Drive, Palm Desert
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 138 PALM DESERT
144
Study Area | Ronald Reagan Elementary School
*VIIHSQ4EVO
6)7368)6 &0:(
&%6-2+832 (6
)%78;33(02
&6-7%(6
746-2+*-)0(02
0% '378% '-6
;
8)736-'8
86%:-73(6
30=14-' ;%=
2);'%780)(6
8%1%6-7/ 63;
(6
1%032)'-6
&%6327'-6
;)78&633/'8
'%6-2(%'8
'39286='09&(6
)2*-)0(02
7%;+6%77'-6
&%= ,-00
;%=
4)&&0) &)%','-6
3%7-7'09&(6
&%0897630'-6
6SREPH6IEKER
)PIQIRXEV]
&-'='0)%2(4)()786-%2
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7 )<-78-2+
463437)(&-/);%=7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH 
   2.1*8

HALF-MILE BUFFER
Freedom Park

RESORTER BLVD

BARINGTON
DR

EASTWOOD LN

SPRINGFIELD LN

LA COSTA CIR
W

OLYMPIC WAY

MALONE CIR

BARONS CIR

WESTBROOK CT

CARINDA CT

COUNTRY CLUB DR

NFIELD LN

SAWGRASSCIR

BAY HILL
WAY
PEB
HCIR

BALTUSROLCIR
Ronald Reagan
Elementary
STRIAN
AGAN
DESTINATIONS + BOUNDARIES EXISTING BIKEWAYS
Data provided by the City of Palm Desert, SCAG, and OpenStreetMap SiteExplorer. Date saved: 5/17/2024.

Schools
Half-Mile Buffer
City Boundary
Parks
School Parcels
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
Bicycle Lane (Class II)
the school lack
rosswalks.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 139 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
145
Figure 78: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (1/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 140 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed Green Backed Bike Lane
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 1 1
2 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
10 10
10 10
10 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

COUNTRY CLUB DR

OASIS CLUB DRIVE

TAMARISK ROW DR
Matchline - See Sheet 141
146
Figure 79: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (2/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 141 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
2 3
3 3
4 4
10 Proposed Green Backed Bike Lane
10 10
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

TAMARISK ROW DR

COUNTRY CLUB DR
OASIS CLUB DRIVE Matchline - See Sheet 140
147
Figure 80: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (3/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 142 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed No Parking During School
Hours Sign
Proposed Red Curb
2 5
3 6
7 5
3 6
7 2
10 Proposed Green Backed Bike Lane
10 10
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
*Existing School Crosswalks were
Upgraded to High Visibility by City
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

COUNTRY CLUB DR

LIBERTY DR

RESORTER BLVD
Matchline - See Sheet 144
Matchline - See Sheet 143
148
Figure 81: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (4/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 143 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
3 4
3 4
10 10 Proposed Green Backed Bike Lane
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

LIBERTY DR RESORTER BLVD

COUNTRY CLUB DR
Matchline - See Sheet 142
149
Figure 82: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (5/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 144 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Proposed Red Curb
Proposed ADA Curb Ramp
Proposed Curb Extension with
Delineator Posts
7 8
9 10
10 Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Pedestrian Street Lighting -
Conduct Illumination Study to Install
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
1 5
1 5
7 8
Proposed Shade Structure for Pick 9
Up/Drop Off
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’
Proposed Yield Markings and
Sign SW24-2(CA)
11 11

LIBERTY DR
Matchline - See Sheet 142
150
Figure 83: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (6/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 145 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Proposed High Visibility Crosswalk
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed Bicycle Conflict Striping
Proposed ADA Curb Ramp
1 1
3 3
4 8
8 4
0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

COUNTRY CLUB DR
Matchline - See Sheet 146
151
Figure 84: Ronald Reagan Elementary School Concept Plans (7/7) SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 146 PALM DESERT
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Ronald Reagan Elementary School
SRTS Plan Recommendations
Upgrade Existing Crosswalk to High
Visibility*
Proposed Lane Width Reduction and
Class II Buffered Bike Lane
Proposed Red Curb
2 3
3 2
7 7
*Existing School Crosswalks were Upgraded to High Visibility by City 0’ 30’ 60’
Scale: 1”=60’

COUNTRY CLUB DR

PARK CENTER DR
Matchline - See Sheet 145
152
This page intentionally left blank
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 147 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
153
Encouraging
Safe Routes
to School in
Palm Desert

05. 154
Non-infrastructure strategies are an important
part of the comprehensive SRTS program. While
infrastructure improvements create safer and more
comfortable routes, non-infrastructure (also called
encouragement and education) SRTS activities like
traffic safety education and promotional activities
encourage students to choose active modes to get
to and from school. In addition, SRTS projects with
non-infrastructure components build enthusiasm
and support for active transportation and can be
an important first step toward implementing more
costly infrastructure improvements.

This section outlines programmatic
recommendations for Palm Desert. These
recommendations provide an opportunity to
identify routes, collect insight on travel patterns,
behaviors, issues, and potential improvements,
and present ways that community members can
participate in SRTS activities.

PROGRAMMATIC SRTS

RECOMMENDATIONS
The Project Team compiled a comprehensive
menu of programmatic activities (pg. 150)
tailored for Palm Desert, which were informed
by school- and community-identified needs
and priorities, available resources, and SRTS
best practices. Also included is a list of general
programmatic recommendations (pg. 155)
that include programs which, while not specifically
designed for SRTS, are relevant to the goals of
SRTS and merit inclusion. These recommendations
provide an opportunity to identify routes; collect
insight on travel patterns, behaviors, issues,
and potential improvements; and present ways
that students, families, and other community
members can participate in SRTS activities. These
recommendations should be used to complement
infrastructure improvements and should be
included in any request for funding, such as
through the State Active Transportation Program or
Federal SS4A Program.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 149 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
155
Recommended
SRTS Programs
Bike/Pedestrian Education
School-based skills and traffic safety instruction
conducted during PE or an after-school program.

Emphasizes development of pedestrian and
bicycle traffic safety skills, bike handling skills, safe riding practices (“street smarts”), helmet fit, and
bike prep.

Resources:
» Safe Travels Education Program (STEP),
Orange County Transportation Authority
» Walk! Bike! Fun! Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
Curriculum, Bike Alliance of Minnesota
Contests and Challenges
Students track walking and biking trips to school
toward some kind of goal or reward. Trips can
be tallied for individuals, classrooms, grades, or
school-wide. Track trips using punch cards, tally
sheets, or an app toward individual or group
rewards.

Resources:
» Marin County SRTS Annual Contests
Crossing Guard Promotional
Education
Crossing guards assist students, families, and
residents in safely crossing the street near schools
and alert drivers that people are crossing the
roadway. It is a violation of the law to disregard
the direction of a crossing guard (California
Vehicle Code Section 2815). However, too often,
crossing guards are ignored or taken for granted.

Education promoting listening to crossing guards
may encourage more people to follow their
directions.

Resources:
» Crossing Guard Promotional Social Media
Posts in English and Spanish (Appendix D)
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 150 PALM DESERT
156
Crossing Guard Siting
Many factors contribute to the need for a crossing
guard at a particular crossing location. The
CAMUTCD provides general guidance for their
use. The Caltrans Active Transportation Resource
Center’s California School Crossing Guard
Training Program cites additional factors and
supporting information that can be used to identify
locations that could benefit from the presence of a
crossing guard.

Monitoring of crossing locations to assess the
need for a crossing guard should occur on
a scheduled basis, such as every two years.

Additional reasons that may require reassessing a
crossing guard location may include:
» New or improved traffic control devices
» Major developments increasing traffic on a
roadway near a school
» School boundary changes
» Schools opening or closing
» Consolidation of schools or changing of grades
» Changes to school bell schedules
Note: Neither the City nor DSUSD provide crossing
guard services to any of the schools. Each school is
responsible for their own crossing guard services.

However, the City provides financial assistance to
DSUSD to manage a School Crossing Guard Program.

Resources:
» CAMUTCD, Caltrans
» California Crossing Guard Training Program,
California Active Transportation Resource
Center
Crossing Guard Training
School crossing guards play an integral role in
fostering a safe and comfortable environment for
students walking and bicycling to school. Training
is essential for crossing guards to perform properly
and safely. Crossing guards can help create
gaps in traffic on busy neighborhood collector
roads, remind drivers of the presence of people
walking, instill safe walking skills in students and
their families, and indicate when people driving
should yield. The California Active Transportation
Resource Center provides trainer courses at no
cost to help jurisdictions and law enforcement with
guidance on how to train and vet potential new
and existing crossing guards.

Resources:
» California Crossing Guard Training Program,
California Active Transportation Resource
Center
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 151 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
157
Demonstration Projects
Demonstration projects are temporary, short-term,
low-cost roadway projects that are used to test,
evaluate, and refine potential changes to the street
before investing in long-term solutions. They use
inexpensive materials such as paint and flexible
bollards to test curb extensions, median refuge
islands, protected bike lanes, and more.

Resources:
» Demonstration Project Implementation Guide,
Minnesota Department of Transportation
» Quick-Build Guide: How to Build Safer Streets
Quickly and Affordably, Alta Planning +
Design, California Bicycle Coalition
E-Bike Training and Licensing
Program
E-bike safety awareness trainings teach students
how to safely use an e-bike on streets. Students
must pass a quiz to demonstrate understanding
of the training and receive a permit to stick on
their e-bike, allowing them to bring and store their
e-bike on campus.

Resources:
» E-Bike Safety Information, Huntington Beach
Union High School District
» City of Oceanside SRTS e-bike safety
educational video
Park + Walk/ Walking School Bus
Park + Walk programs establish locations near
school where students are dropped off and
walk the rest of the way to school by themselves
(depending on age), with friends or with a
parent or caregiver. These locations can also be
designated as “Walking School Bus” stops, where
students are greeted by school staff, volunteers, or
other trusted adult “drivers” and are walked into
school in a supervised group.

Resource:
» Step by Step: How to Start a Walking School
Bus at Your School, Safe Routes National
Partnership
Please Pull Forward Signage
On-campus, “Please Pull Forward” signage can
remind drivers to use the entire arrival/dismissal
space when unloading and loading their students.

This has the benefit of getting vehicles off the
streets, which reduces traffic congestion and
reduces vehicle and pedestrian conflicts.

Resource:
» Please Pull
Forward Signage
in English
and Spanish
(Appendix E) Please Pull
Forward
Por favor,
conduzca
hacia
adelante
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 152 PALM DESERT
158
Safe Routes to School Campaign
Safe Routes to School campaigns are meant
to educate parents, neighbors, and others to
drive slowly and attentively, and watch out
for students walking and biking near schools.

Campaigns may use a range of strategies to share
messaging including yard signs, banners, school
communications, and more.

Resources:
» Safe Routes to School Banner in English and
Spanish (Appendix F)
» Safe Routes to School Safety Campaign
Toolkit, Oregon Metro
School Board Policy
School board policies, like California Board
of Education Board Policy (BP) 5142.2 SRTS
Program, help solidify a school district’s
commitment to promoting active transportation as
a safe and healthy way to get to and from school.

Resource:
» Sample Board Policy Safe Routes to School
Program, California School Board Association
School Champion Toolkit
Resource guide to give parents, caregivers, and
other champions information on how to start or
grow walking and biking programs at their school
sites.

Resources:
» Parent and Community Empowerment Toolkit,
San Mateo County Safe Routes to School
» Volunteer Toolkit, Safe Routes to School
National Partnership
School Communications
Promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving
behavior and encourage families to walk and bike
to school through school communication channels
such as newsletters, social media, websites, and
in-person events. Customized, high-resolution
graphics and messaging ready to share through
electronic platforms or in print.

Resource:
» Safe Travels Education Program (STEP),
Orange County Transportation Authority
» Safe Routes to School Messaging for Pros,
Safe Routes to School National Partnership
Palm Desert Schools Walk & Roll
Las Escuelas de Palm Desert Caminan y Ruedan
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 153 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
159
Student Valet
Student volunteers from upper elementary, middle,
and junior high school who complete traffic safety
training and direct children to safely cross vehicle
traffic on and adjacent to campus. Typically,
patrols are appointed by a teacher or principal
with parent approval.

Resource:
» AAA School Safety Patrol
Suggested Routes to School Maps
Customized maps showing suggested walking
(and biking for older students) routes to school
along with key information including crossing
guard locations, signalized or stop-controlled
intersections, approximate route times, key
landmarks, and more.

Resource:
» Suggested Routes to School Maps for Palm
Desert Schools (Appendix G)
Walk to School Day or Bike to
School Day
One-day, one-time, before school walking or
biking event involving all students. Students will
be encouraged to walk or bike to school on a
particular day (chosen by the school) and will
receive incentives for participation. Other events,
such as Cocoa for Carpools, can be incorporated
into Walk and Bike to School Days for older
students.

Resource:
» Walk, Bike, & Roll to School, National Center
for Safe Routes to School

CONEJO C RI CLE

DAOR NOYNAC PEED

FRED WARING DRIVE

KING FISHER CIRCLE

CAMINO ARROYO

ELCRI C ETI RUZA

PRIMROSE DRIVE

E NAL NI DREV

EUNEVA E NI ROLF

SANTA ROSA WAY

GARY AVENUE

QUICKSILVER DRIVE MERLE DRIVE

PRESIDIO PLACE

RUTLEDGE WAY

BUTTONWOOD DRIVE

ELC IR C ADAVE N

SILKTREE LANE

EUNEVA ALOTROP

EUNEVA OLBAP NAS

RANCHO ROAD

LESLIE AVENUE

MASSON STREET

OLLI CETNO MOESAP

SANTOLINA DRIVE

MERCURY CIRCLE

DAOR ACCEBER

SUTTERS MILL ROAD

LAVENDER WAY

EUNEVA LAUCSAP NAS

MOSS ROSE DRIVE

VIA PALMIRA

ERIN STREET

ASTER DRIVE

KRUG AVENUE

ZIRCON CIRCLE

COLUMBINEDR VI E

DAOR IE DOB MARIGOLD DRIVE

CALLE DEL VERANO

GOLETA AVENUE

MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE

MYRSINE AVENUE

VELARDO DRIVE

DESERT STAR BOULEVARD
Abraham
Lincoln
Elementary
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Palm Desert
Charter
Middle School
Palm Desert
Civic Center
Park
Magnesia Falls Park
Use caution when walking
on Primrose Drive; there is
a sidewalk gap and most
intersections lack crosswalks.

Use caution
when crossing;
these are
large and busy
intersections.

Use caution when
walking on Deep Canyon
Road; most intersections
lack crosswalks and
north-south traffic does
not have stop signs.
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~17 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~7 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.25 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
1 mile
from school

0.5 miles
from school
1 mile
from school
Use caution when walking
on Primrose Drive; there is
a sidewalk gap and most
intersections lack crosswalks.

Use caution
when crossing;
these are
large and busy
intersections.

Use caution when
walking on Deep Canyon
Road; most intersections
lack crosswalks and
north-south traffic does
not have stop signs.
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~17 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~7 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.25 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
1 mile
from school

0.5 miles
from school
1 mile
from school
A pedestrian
bridge provides
access to Civic
Center Park.
~20 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Use caution when
crossing; traffic on
Rutledge Way does
not have stop signs.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
LEGEND
Intersection with Traffic Signal
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
Suggested Walk to School Route —
Use Extreme Caution: Missing Sidewalk
Magnesia Falls Dr
Portola Ave
Rutledge Way
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 154 PALM DESERT
160
Other Recommended
Programs
Bike Lending Library
Bike lending libraries provide bicycles to people
who want to test bicycle travel before purchasing
a bike or do not have the resources to purchase
a quality bike. These libraries offer bike rentals
for longer durations than a single trip, typically
providing a personal bike for weeks or months.

These programs are significantly less expensive to
manage and maintain than a traditional bikeshare
system, which typically requires docking stations
within one-half mile of each other. By centralizing
pick-up and drop-off at a single location hub,
bike libraries also create a captive audience for
education and safety courses and materials to
support SRTS goals.

The bike library should offer a variety of bikes,
such as e-bikes, cargo bikes, and tricycles,
to provide options for people to use during
different trip purposes, abilities, and seasons. To
accommodate riders with the highest need, rental
fees should be subsidized or free based on social
services eligibility or for students. Bike libraries
can be City-operated or managed in partnership
with local bike shops and advocacy groups that
can provide and maintain the bikes. The City can
pursue grant opportunities to fund the bike library
through the Active Transportation Program and
Regional Early Action Planning (REAP) programs
and leverage California Air Resources Board
rebate programs for e-bike purchases to facilitate
a bike-to-own model.

Car-Free Streets Near Schools
Car-free street events promote health and
community connection by creating a safe and
attractive space for physical activity and social
contact. These events temporarily close streets
near a school to motor vehicles, creating a safe
and welcoming environment not only for students
but for people of all ages to engage in walking,
bicycling, dining, dancing, and other activities.

These events are cost-effective compared to
building new parks for the same purpose. The
events have many names: Ciclovías (originating
in South America), Open Streets, Summer Streets,
Sunday Streets, and Sunday Parkways. Car-free
events have been very successful internationally
and are rapidly becoming popular throughout
California and the US. Events can be regularly
scheduled or one-time occasions.

The perception of temporary road closures
and parking loss can cause initial opposition
from local residents and businesses. To mitigate
these concerns, a small-scale, pilot event is
recommended where a block or two is restricted
from car traffic. Following a successful pilot, the
event’s scope can expand as people experience
car-free streets and become more receptive to
larger events.

Resource:
» Open Streets Project, The Movement for Open
Streets
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 155 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
161
Group Walking and Biking Events
Similar to Walking School Buses, group walking
events can encourage students to walk more
regularly in a supportive setting. The City might
consider partnering with Palm Desert schools and
the DSUSD to facilitate these walking events. Each
walk is led by volunteer safety professionals who
instruct students on proper walking techniques
and the benefits of walking to school. These
discussions can inspire students to adopt healthier
habits in their daily lives. Beyond the physical
benefits, group walking events foster community
connection, allowing students to learn from one
another and celebrate their diverse backgrounds.

Similarly, group bicycle rides offer older students
the opportunity to practice biking and build
confidence, guided by City or DSUSD staff. The
City may consider partnering with local biking
nonprofit organizations, such as the Desert
Bicycle Club, to lead bicycle-related events and
educational programs. Additionally, the City could
collaborate with local bike rental shops to offer
free bike or e-bike experiences for participants
who do not own a bicycle. Before rides begin,
facilitators can also provide education so that
every participant has basic knowledge about the
rules of the road, bicyclist laws and rights, and
bike safety.

Transit Outings and Ambassadors
Transit outings offer older students the opportunity
to practice taking transit, walk safely and
comfortably, and gain confidence, guided by
City staff or the DSUSD. These outings may be
particularly valuable for DSUSD students in
grades 9 through 12 who are not eligible for
school bus service and who may lack reliable
transportation between home and school.

Additionally, the SunLine Transit Ambassador
Program (TAP) offers comprehensive training
sessions that address crucial topics and everyday
scenarios in public transportation service. Transit
Ambassadors, who have completed this program,
can assist passengers with their trip planning and
provide support until passengers feel confident
in navigating the SunLine system independently.

The City could consider partnering with SunLine
Transit Agency to leverage the TAP, encouraging
older students to use transit regularly, fostering
independence and increasing transit use within the
community. Students who participate in TAP could
also serve as advocates at schools, encouraging
fellow students to consider active transportation
modes. Furthermore, the TAP could facilitate the
formation of travel buddy relationships, enhancing
social connections while providing “safety in
numbers.”
Pairing these outings with seasonal activities,
such as outdoor concerts, or key destinations
like schools, parks, and libraries, could further
encourage participation and make the experience
more enjoyable and meaningful.

Resource:
» Travel Training Program, SunLine Transit
Agency
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 156 PALM DESERT
162
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 157 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
163
Implementing
Safe Routes
to School in
Palm Desert

06. 164
Funding for SRTS programs and projects may come from a variety of sources including matching grants, sales tax or other taxes, bond measures, or public/private partnerships. This section identifies sources of funding for design, implementation, and maintenance of SRTS projects. The descriptions are intended to provide an overview of available options and do not represent a comprehensive list. It should be noted that this section reflects the funding available at the time of writing. The funding amounts, fund cycles, and even the programs themselves are susceptible to change without notice.

As funding and grant opportunities become available in the future, the City will prioritize the implementation of recommendations in this plan, utilizing these resources to support the continued development and enhancement of SRTS programs and projects.

FUNDING
Active Transportation
Infrastructure Investment
Program (ATIIP)
ATIIP is a federal initiative designed to enhance
infrastructure for bicyclists and pedestrians.

Administered by the Federal Highway
Administration, the program provides funding
to state and local governments for projects that
improve facilities for non-motorized users. These
projects may include constructing or upgrading
bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other
amenities that support walking and cycling.

Better Utilizing Investments
to Leverage Development
Grant Program (BUILD)
The BUILD Grant Program enables the Department
of Transportation to invest in road, rail, transit,
and port projects that have a significant local
or regional impact. Eligible projects include
recreational trails, road diets, separated bike
lanes, shared use paths, sidewalks, signal
improvements, signed pedestrian or bicycle routes,
traffic calming, trailside and trailhead facilities,
bicycle parking, racks, repair stations, storage,
and bike share programs.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 159 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
165
Caltrans Active
Transportation Program
(ATP)
The ATP consolidated existing federal programs
including Bicycle Transportation Account, the Safe
Routes to Schools Program, and the Recreational
Trails Program, into a single program. The purpose
of this grant is to fund active transportation
projects. Eligible pedestrian and Safe Routes to
School projects include infrastructure projects
(planning, design, and construction), education,
encouragement, and planning activities. The
California Transportation Commission writes
guidelines and allocates funds for the ATP, while
the ATP will be administered by the Caltrans
Division of Local Assistance.

Caltrans Highway Safety
Improvement Program
(HSIP)
HSIP is a data-driven funding program, and
eligible projects must be identified through
analysis of crash experience, crash potential,
crash rate, or other similar metrics. Infrastructure
and non-infrastructure projects are eligible
for HSIP funds. Bicycle and pedestrian safety
improvements, enforcement activities, traffic
calming projects, and crossing treatments for
active transportation users in school zones are
examples of eligible projects. All HSIP projects
must be consistent with the state’s Strategic
Highway Safety Plan. In California, HSIP is
administered by Caltrans.

Caltrans Transportation
Development Act (TDA)
TDA provides funding from State Transit Assistance
and Local Transportation Fund. This program funds
a variety of transportation programs including
those for pedestrians, bicyclists, and people
accessing transit facilities. The amount of funding is
based on sales tax collected in each county. This
fund is administered by Caltrans.

City of Palm Desert
Measure G
Approved in 2024, Measure G is a 1% sales tax
that funds general city services. These funds may
be used to construct public infrastructure, including
new bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Measure
G also provides funding for the maintenance of
streets, community centers, parks, trails, and other
facilities used by students and families.

Congestion Mitigation and
Air Quality Improvement
Program (CMAQ)
CMAQ is a federal initiative that provides funding
to state and local governments for transportation
projects aimed at reducing congestion and
improving air quality in areas that do not meet
the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter.

Eligible projects include the development of public
transportation systems, implementation of traffic
flow improvements, and promotion of alternative
transportation modes such as biking and walking.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 160 PALM DESERT
166
Riverside County
Transportation Commission
Measure A
First approved in 1988, Measure A is a half-cent
sales tax that funds transportation improvements
through 2039. Funds go back to each of the
three geographic areas within Riverside County:

Coachella Valley, Western Riverside County, and
Palo Verde Valley, in proportion to the sales taxes
they contribute. In Coachella Valley, 50% of funds
go to highway and regional arterials, 35% to
local streets and roads, and 15% to public transit.

Safe Streets and Roads for
All Grant Program (SS4A)
Established through the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act, SS4A will provide $5 billion in
funding from 2022 to 2026 to support local,
regional, and tribal initiatives aimed at reducing
roadway deaths and serious injuries. SS4A
offers grants for planning, demonstration,
and implementation projects, with a focus on
pedestrian, bicyclist, and transit safety.

Southern California
Association of Governments
(SCAG) – Sustainable
Communities Program (SCP)
SCP funds projects that support active
transportation and the development of
sustainable, equitable, and economically vibrant
communities across the state. Through this
program, SCAG offers financial resources to local
and regional planning agencies to implement
projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
enhance transportation systems, and promote
environmental justice. This funding opportunity can
help improve pedestrian infrastructure for students
by supporting projects that make walking safer
and more accessible.

Surface Transportation Block
Grant Program (STBG)
STBG provides states with flexible funds that may
be used for a variety of highway, road, bridge,
and transit projects. Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements are eligible, including trails,
sidewalks, bike lanes, crosswalks, pedestrian
signals, and other ancillary facilities. The grantfunded pedestrian and bicycle facilities may be located on local roads that are not part of the
Federal-aid Highway System. Funds are funneled
through Caltrans to Metropolitan Planning
Organizations to administer the grant.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL 161 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
167
Appendices
168
Complete Existing
Conditions Report
Complete High-Injury
Network Analysis
Complete Outreach and
Engagement Report
Crossing Guard
Promotional Social Media
Posts in English and
Spanish
Please Pull Forward
Signage in English and
Spanish
Safe Routes to School
Banner in English and
Spanish
Suggested Routes to
School Maps for Palm
Desert Schools
Sample Student Tally
Survey
Sample Parent/Caregiver
Survey
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I

LIST OF APPENDICES

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL VISION ZERO STRATEGY
169
Complete
Existing
Conditions
Report
A.
170
Complete Palm Desert Safe Routes to School Existing Conditions Report Introduction
The Palm Desert Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan seek to identify barriers to safe walking and bicycling on routes frequented by Palm Desert’s K-12 public school students and to develop solutions in consultation with the community, public sector partners, and city leadership. The Plans will reflect the unique challenges and opportunities in Palm Desert and address active transportation network gaps that negatively impact access to neighborhood schools, parks, hospitals, retail centers, and other destinations.

The purpose of this Existing Conditions Memo is to identify existing demographics, infrastructure, and commute trends as well as review existing City and regional plans related to active transportation in Palm Desert. Using this existing data, analyses were completed to find gaps in the existing active transportation network. This information identifies opportunities for active transportation improvements to enhance the safety and comfort of people walking, biking, and rolling. The findings from this memo will be included in separate existing conditions chapters in the draft Safe Routes to School Plan and will directly inform infrastructure and programmatic recommendations.
171
Safe Routes to School
Background
There are eight schools included in the Palm Desert SRTS Plan including five elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school (Figure 1). All schools are part of the Desert Sands Unified School District. Two schools are located just outside Palm Desert city limits, one in the City of La Quinta and one in the City of Indian Wells. Table 1 presents a list of the schools by their city, grade level, and bell schedules.

Table 1. Palm Desert SRTS Project Schools Details
School Name City Level Start End
Abraham Lincoln
Elementary School
Palm Desert Elementary 7:55 AM 2:00 PM
George Washington
Charter School
Palm Desert Elementary 8:10 AM 3:00 PM
James Earl Carter
Elementary School
Palm Desert Elementary 8:45 AM 3:15 PM
Palm Desert Charter
Middle School
Palm Desert Middle 8:10 AM 2:36 PM
Palm Desert High School Palm Desert High 8:30 AM 3:35 PM Ronald Reagan Elementary
School
Palm Desert Elementary 8:00 AM 2:30 PM
Gerald R. Ford Elementary
School
Indian Wells Elementary 9:00 AM 3:27 PM
Colonel Mitchell Paige
Middle School
La Quinta Middle 8:30 AM 3:01 PM
172
Figure 1. Palm Desert SRTS Project Schools Locations
173
Plans, Policies, and Programs Review
This project builds on numerous local and regional plans, policies, and standards that impact active transportation in Palm Desert. These planning documents and studies were reviewed to gain a better understanding of existing conditions in the City, as well as proposed and planned facilities for biking and walking.

The plans and studies reviewed, and a summary of their contents, are listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Plans Reviewed by Jurisdiction
Plan Name Summary Municipality Year Adopted
Connect SoCal 2024 The long-term plan for Southern California that details the necessary investments in
transportation and development until 2050. The
plan does not make any specific
recommendations, but rather focuses on long
term goals and systemic changes to address
mobility issues throughout the region.

SCAG 2024
Transforming Haystack Road:

Traffic Calming and Safety Study
A study on a 1.3 mile segment of Haystack Road
to improve road user safety. This project is
currently implementing active transportation
improvements outlined for this segment in the
General Plan and Local Roadway Safety Plan.

Palm Desert 2024
Walk and Roll Program The implementation plan for the ideas laid out in the Palm Desert General Plan to create a more
complete network of active transportation
infrastructure. The plan is broken into three
phases. Plan implementation is currently
underway.

Palm Desert 2024
District 8 Active Transportation
Plan
A plan that identifies the pedestrian and bicycle
needs across the State Highway System. This
plan puts forth regional improvements in the
Coachella Valley, but nothing specific to Palm
Desert.

CalTrans 2022
Local Roadway Safety Plan The City of Palm Desert’s plan to identify key areas using crash data to inform and evaluate
the safety of the City’s transportation network.

The plan puts forth a toolbox of safety measures
that should be implemented throughout the City.

Palm Desert 2021
Riverside County Transportation
Commission Long Range
Transportation Study
A Long Range Transportation Plan to address
transportation in Riverside County and allocate
Measure A tax dollars. The plan proposes
funding to rail improvements, a county wide Safe
Route to School program, and infrastructure
changes to support active transportation.

Riverside
County
2019
CV Link Master Plan The envisioned 40-mile, valley wide pathway for pedestrians, cyclists, and low-speed electric
vehicles through the Coachella Valley. There are
almost 5 miles of segments through Palm Desert.

CVAG 2016
174
Plan Name Summary Municipality Year Adopted
Palm Desert General Plan This plan builds upon the vision of the Envision Palm Desert Strategic Plan to create guiding
development principles for the City of Palm
Desert. The General Plan proposes specific active
transportation infrastructure projects within
Palm Desert that are being implemented through
the Walk and Roll Program.

Palm Desert 2016
Envision Palm Desert Strategic
Plan
A collaborative plan between the City and
residents to create a community vision and
action steps. It resulted in nine Strategic Results
Areas to address within the City. The plan
defines guiding principles and priorities for more
specific development items in subsequent plans.

Palm Desert 2014
Coachella Valley Association of
Governments Active
Transportation Plan
The Active Transportation Plan updates the NonMotorized Transportation Plan for regional bikeways through Coachella Valley. This plan
proposes large regional bikeway routes along
state highways, connecting to the CV Link, and
the stormwater channels.

CVAG 2010
Coachella Valley Association of
Governments Transportation
Project Prioritization Study
This study prioritizes funding for transportation
improvements including bicyclist and pedestrian
facilities using roadway surface conditions, level
of service, crash rates and other criteria that
advance regional goals
CVAG 2010
175
Equity Profile
The following presents an equity profile using Free and Reduced Price Meals (FRPM) eligibility. FRPM was selected as a means of identifying schools with a greater proportion of low-income households, which are often correlated with higher rates of poverty and greater barriers to transportation.

Free and Reduced Price Meals
The National School Lunch Program is a federally funded program that assists schools in providing nutritious lunches to students at reasonable prices. The program must be open to all enrolled students and free or reduced-price meals must be provided to those children who qualify for such benefits according to specified family size and income standards. Table 3 and Figure 2 show the Palm Desert SRTS schools and their percentage of students eligible for free and free or reduced-price meals during the 2022-2023 school year.

Table 3. K-12 Free or Reduced-Price Meals Data (2022-2023) School Name Enrollment Percent (%) Eligible Free Percent (%) Eligible Free or Reduced-Price Meal
Abraham Lincoln Elementary School 585 68.7% 79.5%
Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School 436 63.1% 74.3%
George Washington Charter School 755 35.2% 49.0%
Gerald R. Ford Elementary School 603 46.3% 58.7%
James Earl Carter Elementary School 516 41.7% 53.1%
Palm Desert Charter Middle School 1,347 45.6% 60.3%
Palm Desert High School 2,050 42.1% 57.3%
Ronald Reagan Elementary School 834 40.9% 53.2%
176
Figure 2. K-12 Free or Reduced-Price Meals Eligibility in Palm Desert (2022-2023) 177
Land Uses
Existing land use surrounding schools in Palm Desert is primarily residential (Figure 3). Most of the residential areas around schools are single family detached homes with some multi-family parcels. George Washington Charter School is surrounded by residential land uses but is located two blocks away from the main commercial corridor of Palm Desert, El Paseo. Additionally, some schools are located next to open space which could provide alternative transportation and recreational opportunities for students. For example, Ronald Reagan Elementary School is bordered by Palm Desert Freedom Park to the north. 178
Figure 3. Citywide Land Uses
179
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
The sidewalk network throughout Palm Desert is relatively well-connected, especially on major arterials and collector streets. However, many residential streets lack sidewalks and other pedestrian infrastructure like marked crossings. In school areas, many streets have existing sidewalks leading to the school. However, some schools lack adequate pedestrian facilities. To improve walking conditions to and from schools, missing sidewalks could be added along key segments, existing sidewalks could be widened, crosswalks could be upgraded to be higher visibility, and flashing beacons could be added to crosswalks without stop signs or traffic signals. Portola Avenue, Hovley Lane, Fred Waring Drive, Washington Street, and Country Club Road are all major arterials on which project schools are located. Because of high traffic volumes and speeds, these streets can serve as deterrents to students who may potentially walk to school. Traffic calming elements like raised crosswalks or speed humps would increase pedestrian safety and comfort in these school areas. The addition of crossing guards would further increase biking and walking conditions in school areas.

Figure 4. Chicory Street, north of George Washington Charter School 180
As shown in the graphic below, bicycle facility types are broken down by class types that range from I to IV.

Classes are typically color coded by level of traffic stress (LTS) with LTS 1 being most comfortable and LTS 4 being least comfortable for cyclists with limited confidence and children.

Figure 5. Traffic Stress Levels and Corresponding Facility Types Despite high posted speed limits and multiple lanes of traffic, the existing local bicycle network in Palm Desert consists primarily of Class II bike lanes and Class IIB buffered bike lanes on the city’s major arterials and Class III bikeways on lower volume roads. There is a Class IV separated bikeway on San Pablo Avenue between Magnesia Falls Drive and Fred Waring Drive, which then changes to buffered bike lanes between Fred Waring Drive and Highway 111. Regionally, the CV Link bicycle trail provides bicycle connections through the Coachella Valley. In Palm Desert, the CV Link is primarily comprised of high-quality Class IV facilities that run in an east-west direction connecting the Bump and Grind Trail, College of the Desert, Civic Center Park, Abraham Lincoln Elementary School, Palm Desert Charter Middle School, Palm Desert High School and adjacent residential areas.

There was an existing ½ mile Class I facility between Magnesia Falls Drive and Cook Street that has since been integrated into the CV Link network. The following table shows the total mileage of each bikeway class in Palm Desert.
181
Table 4. Total Mileage by Bikeway Class
Bikeway Class Mileage Total
Class I 0.5
Class II 48.61
Class IIB 0.52
Class III 17.55
Class IV 4.96
Total 72.14
End-of-trip bike facilities, such as bike racks, are mostly concentrated along El Paseo, San Pablo Avenue, and Highway 111, where many of the local commercial destinations are concentrated. As part of Safe Routes to Schools efforts, schools can consider adding visible and easily accessible bike racks to encourage students to bike to school.

Figure 6. Bike rack and Class IIB Buffered Bike Lanes on San Pablo Avenue 182
Significant gaps in the bicycle network include a north-south connection on Monterey Avenue between Magnesia Falls Drive and Country Club Drive, as well as an east-west facility continuation on Hovley Lane between Cook Street and Portola Avenue. Closing the gap in facilities on Portola Avenue between the CV Link and Shadow Mountain Drive would provide increased connectivity through downtown Palm Desert. As seen in the Collision Analysis (page 37), many collisions involving people walking and biking occurred along major arterials, including Highway 111, Fred Waring Drive, Cook Street and Country Club Drive. Providing crossings that prioritize people walking and biking, especially Highway 111, will make the whole active transportation network safer.

Figure 7. Fred Waring Drive, north of Gerald R. Ford Elementary School 183
The City of Palm Desert has several bicycle facilities proposed in its General Plan. Existing and proposed bike facilities in Palm Desert are listed in Table 5, and mapped in Figure 8.

Table 5. Existing and Previously Proposed Bikeways by Class Class Street Start Street End Street Status
Class I CV Link (off-street) Deep Canyon Road Cook Street Existing Class II Country Club Drive Monterey Avenue Washington Street Existing Class II Hovley Lane Monterey Avenue Portola Avenue Existing Class II Gerald Ford Drive Monterey Avenue Frank Sinatra Drive Existing Class II Frank Sinatra Drive Monterey Avenue 42nd Avenue Existing Class II Portola Avenue Dinah Shore Drive Magnesia Falls Drive Existing Class II Monterey Avenue Gerald Ford Drive Country Club Drive Existing Class II Dick Kelly Drive Monterey Avenue Dinah Shore Drive Existing Class II Dinah Shore Drive City Limit College Drive Existing Class II Cook Street I-10 Fred Waring Drive Existing
Class II Eldorado Drive Frank Sinatra Drive 42nd Avenue Existing Class II 42nd Avenue Cook Street Washington Street Existing Class II College Drive Portola Avenue Frank Sinatra Drive Existing Class II University Park College Drive Cook Street Existing Class II A Street Monterey Avenue Gateway Drive Existing Class II Gateway Drive Dinah Shore Drive Gerald Ford Drive Existing Class II Dolce Avenue/Cortesia Way Gateway Drive Dick Kelly Drive Existing Class II Highway 74 El Paseo S City Limit Existing
Class II Highway 111 W City Limit E City Limit Existing Class II Painters Path Edgehill Drive El Paseo Existing Class IIB San Pablo Avenue Highway 111 San Gorgonio Way Existing Class II Fred Waring Drive San Pascual Avenue Deep Canyon Road Existing Class II Fred Waring Drive Monterey Avenue San Pablo Avenue Existing Class II Deep Canyon Road Magnesia Falls Drive Highway 111 Existing Class II Portola Avenue Mesa View Drive Shadow Mountain Drive Existing Class II Mesa View Drive Highway 74 Portola Avenue Existing Class III California Drive Fred Waring Drive Warner Trail Existing Class III Warner Trail Fred Waring Drive 42nd Avenue Existing Class III Florida Avenue California Drive Fred Waring Drive Existing Class III Idaho Street 42nd Avenue Michigan Drive Existing Class III Avenue of the States Washington Street California Drive Existing Class III El Paseo Fred Waring Drive De Anza Way Existing Class III San Gorgonio Way Monterey Avenue Highway 111 Existing Class III San Luis Rey Avenue Ironwoods Street De Anza Way Existing Class III Fairway Drive Portola Avenue E City Limit Existing Class III Deep Canyon Road Abronia Trail Old Prospector Trail Existing Class III Grapevine Street Highway 74 E City Limit Existing Class III Shadow Mountain Drive Highway 74 Portola Avenue Existing Class III Ocotillo Drive Grapevine Street El Paseo Existing Class III Joshua Tree Street Grapevine Street San Luis Rey Avenue Existing 184
Class Street Start Street End Street Status
Class III San Pablo Avenue Shadow Mountain Drive Highway 111 Existing Class III Edgehill Drive Painters Path Tierra del Oro Existing Class III Calle De Los Campesinos Along River Along River Existing Class IV CV Link (Painters Path/Magnesia
Falls Drive)
Bump and Grind Trailhead Deep Canyon Road Existing
Class IV San Pablo Avenue Fred Waring Drive Magnesia Falls Drive Existing Class II Monterey Avenue Gerald Ford Drive Country Club Drive Proposed in General Plan
Class II Fred Waring Drive Washington Street California Avenue Proposed in General Plan
Class II Fred Waring Drive Cook Street City Limit near Kelsey Circle Proposed in General Plan
Class II De Anza Way Monterey Avenue Alessandro Drive Proposed in General Plan
Class II Shadow Mountain Drive Frontage Road Portola Avenue Proposed in General Plan
The City of Palm Desert also has an existing sidewalk network throughout the city, as observed by the planning team during walk audits and site visits. However, due to the lack of reliable data on the current condition and extent of the citywide sidewalk network, a full analysis on existing conditions and gaps is not currently possible.

The City does have a network of proposed shared sidewalk paths in the General Plan that are listed in the following table. These sidewalks are meant to accommodate both pedestrians and cyclists and are typically located along high-speed arterials.

Table 6. Proposed Shared Sidewalks in Palm Desert
Class Street Start Street End Street Status
Shared
Sidewalk
Washington Street Hovley Lane Woodhaven Country Club Proposed in General Plan
Shared
Sidewalk
Hovley Lane Cook Street Portola Avenue Proposed in
General Plan
Shared
Sidewalk
Fred Waring Drive Cook Street Deep Canyon Road Proposed in General Plan
Shared
Sidewalk
Fred Waring Drive San Pascual Avenue San Pablo Avenue Proposed in General Plan
Shared
Sidewalk
Fred Waring Drive Monterey Avenue Highway 111 Proposed in General Plan
Shared
Sidewalk
Portola Avenue Shadow Mountain Drive Magnesia Falls Drive Proposed in General Plan
185
Figure 8. Bikeways and Gaps
186
The following paragraphs provide details of existing bikeways facilities near each project school (Figure 9 to Figure 15):

Abraham Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Charter Middle Each school can access the Class IV CV Link on their northern edge along Magnesia Falls Drive. There are existing Class II facilities along Deep Canyon Road and Fred Waring Drive, however, these facilities may not provide enough physical protection given the size of the arterials. There are potential neighborhood greenway connections through Portola Avenue and Rutledge Way to access the southern sides of the school.

Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School
Colonel Paige Middle School does not have any existing bicycle connections in Palm Desert city limits. There are Class II lanes on Fred Waring Drive east of Washington Street and on Palm Royale Drive in the City of La Quinta.

George Washington Charter School
George Washington Charter School has existing Class II facilities on Portola Avenue, however, due to the size and speed of this arterial more protection may be needed. There are Class III neighborhood connections along Fairway Drive, Deep Canyon Road, and Shadow Mountain Drive. Due to its proximity to the downtown area of El Paseo, this school would greatly benefit from high quality protected bike lanes.

Gerald R. Ford Elementary School
Gerald R. Ford Elementary School generally lacks bicycle connections. Warner Trail is relatively well-used by bicyclists but lacks bicycle facilities and signage. Fred Waring Drive, a busy thoroughfare just north of the school, has postage signage forbidding bicycles on the street and sidewalk.

James Earl Carter Elementary School
James Carter Elementary School has existing Class II facilities on Portola Avenue, however, due to the size and speed of this arterial more protection may be needed. There are also no facilities on Hovley Lane along the north side of the school.

Palm Desert High School
Palm Desert High School is well connected to existing bicycle facilities. The CV Link Class I path runs along the north side of the school. Additionally, Cook Street and Deep Canyon Road have Class II facilities. There are no bike connections along Fred Waring Drive or through the neighborhood to the south side of the school.

Ronald Reagan Elementary School
Ronald Reagan Elementary has Class II bike facilities along Country Club Drive and Oasis Club Road. Country Club Drive is a large, high-speed arterial that could potentially warrant a road diet, traffic calming, and added protection for the existing bike lane. There are also potential connections through the neighborhood along Resorter Boulevard, provided there is a safe crossing at the Country Club Drive intersection. 187
Figure 9. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Abraham Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Charter Middle 188
Figure 10. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School 189
Figure 11. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near George Washington Charter School 190
Figure 12. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Gerald R. Ford Elementary School 191
Figure 13. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near James Earl Carter Elementary School 192
Figure 14. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Palm Desert High School 193
Figure 15. Bicycle and Pedestrian Gaps near Ronald Reagan Elementary School 194
Transit Facilities
The City of Palm Desert is served by SunLine Transit Agency and has two major fixed-route bus (SunBus) corridors: Cook Street running north to south, and Fred Waring Drive running from east to west (Figure 18).

There is additional SunBus service on Monterey Avenue as far north as Country Club Drive, and along Highway 111 from Monterey Avenue to the eastern city limits. All buses in the SunBus system are equipped with a bike rack on the front of the bus to allow for transit integration between the bus and bike networks. Some but not all bus stops in the SunLine system are equipped with bus shelters, benches, signage, and bike racks.

Figure 16: Bus Stop at the Intersection of Deep Canyon Road and Highway 111 Featuring High Quality Facilities 195
Figure 17: Bus Stop along Fred Waring Drive with Limited Facilities for Riders Only three schools in Palm Desert are located near SunBus stops: Palm Desert High School, Gerald Ford Elementary School, and Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School. School buses in Palm Desert are provided by Desert Sands Unified School District based on students’ reasonable distances from schools. Kindergarten through 2nd grade has a reasonable distance of ¾ mile, 3rd through 5th grade is 1.5 miles, and 6th through 8th grade is 3 miles. The following schools are serviced by school buses: Carter Elementary, Ford Elementary, Lincoln Elementary, Reagan Elementary, Washington Charter, Paige Middle, and Palm Desert Charter Middle. 196
Figure 18. Transit Routes and Stops
197
Vehicle Volumes and Speeds
Schools in Palm Desert are commonly located along large, high-speed thoroughfares such as Hovley Lane, Cook Street, Portola Avenue, and Fred Waring Drive, many of which have above 20,000 annual average daily traffic (AADT). Palm Desert High School, Palm Desert Charter Middle, and Lincoln Elementary, for example, are located along arterials with high traffic volumes of approximately 20,000 – 22,000 AADT. Large arterial streets, such as Fred Waring Drive, have posted speed limits of 45 miles per hour while smaller collector streets, such as Magnesia Falls Drive, have posted speed limits of 35 miles per hour. Throughout the City there is a 25 miles per hour speed limit in all school zones during school hours. 1 1 The traffic count data was filtered by removing “service” and “unclassified” roads, as well as removing 37 entries that had ‘0’ values. 198
Figure 19. Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes
199
Traffic Counts
Vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic counts were collected in May 2024 during the school drop-off and pickup time for 23 study locations. Up to four locations were selected within or just outside a quarter mile of each school based upon the review of school streets, collision history, school enrollment boundaries, and observations from walk audits. California School Crossing Guard Training Program and Guidelines by Caltrans and the Active Transportation Resource Center were also reviewed to select the study locations.

The count information will be used to assess demand that can inform areas for improvement and prioritize potential projects. Additionally, the count information will also be used to inform the Crossing Guard Analysis. 200
Figure 20. Traffic Count Locations
201
Table 7. Traffic Count Locations by School
School Name # Study Locations Count Time (AM) Count Time (PM) Abraham Lincoln Elementary
School
1 Portola Avenue/Magnesia Falls
Drive
6:55-8:55 AM 1:00-3:00 PM
2 Portola Avenue/Rutledge Way 6:55-8:55 AM 1:00-3:00 PM 3 Park Place/Magnesia Falls Drive 6:55-8:55 AM 1:00-3:00 PM Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle
School
4 Palm Royale Drive/Crosswalk in
front of school
7:30-9:30 AM 2:01-4:01 PM
5 Washington Street/Fred Waring
Drive
7:30-9:30 AM 2:01-4:01 PM
6 Washington Street/Palm Royale
Drive (Mountain View)
7:30-9:30 AM 2:01-4:01 PM
7 Palm Royale Drive/Fred Waring
Drive
7:30-9:30 AM 2:01-4:01 PM
George Washington Charter School 8 Shadow Mountain Drive/Chicory Street
7:10-9:10 AM 2:00-4:00 PM
9 Portola Avenue/Shadow
Mountain Drive
7:10-9:10 AM 2:00-4:00 PM
10 Portola Avenue/Fairway Drive 7:10-9:10 AM 2:00-4:00 PM 11 Lantana Avenue/Peppergrass
Street
7:10-9:10 AM 2:00-4:00 PM
Gerald R. Ford Elementary School 12 Warner Trail/Evening Star Circle 8:00-10:00 AM 2:27-4:27 PM 13 Warner Trail/Fred Waring Drive 8:00-10:00 AM 2:27-4:27 PM 14 Warner Trail/Blackfoot Drive 8:00-10:00 AM 2:27-4:27 PM James Earl Carter Elementary
School
15 Portola Avenue/Hovley Lane 7:45-9:45 AM 1:00-3:00 PM 16 Corporate Way/Hovley Lane 7:45-9:45 AM 1:00-3:00 PM
Palm Desert Charter Middle School 17 Rutledge Way/Magnesia Falls Drive
7:10-9:10 AM 1:36-3:36 PM
18 Rutledge Way/Myrsine Avenue 7:10-9:10 AM 1:36-3:36 PM Palm Desert High School 19 Cook Street/Aztec Road 7:30-9:30 AM 2:35-4:35 PM 20 Cook Street/Fred Waring Drive 7:30-9:30 AM 2:35-4:35 PM 21 Phyllis Jackson Lane/Fred
Waring Drive
7:30-9:30 AM 2:35-4:35 PM
Ronald Reagan Elementary School 22 Liberty Drive/Country Club Drive 7:00-9:00 AM 1:30-3:30 PM 23 Tamarisk Row Drive/Country
Club Drive
7:00-9:00 AM 1:30-3:30 PM
Traffic Counts Summary
Pedestrian traffic was highest at Shadow Mountain Drive and Chicory Street (George Washington Charter School, intersection #8) for both AM and PM peak hours, with 201 total pedestrian crossings in the AM and 284 pedestrian crossings in the PM. Bicycle traffic was highest at Portola Avenue and Magnesia Falls Drive (Abraham Lincoln Elementary School, intersection #1), with 23 bicycles crossing, and at Portola Avenue and Rutledge Way (Abraham Lincoln Elementary School, intersection #2), with 18 bicycle crossings, for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. For both the AM and PM peak hours, vehicular volumes were highest at Washington Street and 202
Fred Waring Drive (Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School, intersection #5), with 9,765 vehicles and 10,607 vehicles, respectively.

Table 8. School Areas Intersection Counts, Pedestrians and Bicycles Intersection
ID
Street 1 Street 2 Pedestrians Bicycles
AM PM Total AM PM Total
1 Portola Avenue Magnesia Falls
Drive
82 108 190 23 13 36
2 Portola Avenue Rutledge Way 42 50 92 21 18 39
3 Park Place Magnesia Falls
Drive
14 42 56 9 6 15
4 Palm Royale
Drive
Crosswalk in front
of school
29 93 122 0 0 0
5 Washington
Street
Fred Waring Drive 3 2 5 3 0 3
6 Washington
Street
Palm Royale Drive 17 12 29 14 10 24
7 Palm Royale
Drive
Fred Waring Drive 1 1 2 1 1 2
8 Shadow
Mountain Drive
Chicory Street 201 284 485 2 0 2
9 Portola Avenue Shadow Mountain
Drive
20 14 34 17 13 30
10 Portola Avenue Fairway Drive 12 1 13 11 2 13
11 Lantana Avenue Peppergrass
Street
22 139 161 2 1 3
12 Warner Trail Evening Star Circle 6 25 31 8 3 11
13 Warner Trail Fred Waring Drive 11 8 19 8 4 12
14 Warner Trail Blackfoot Drive 3 5 8 8 1 9
15 Portola Avenue Hovley Lane 18 3 21 14 6 20
16 Corporate Way Hovley lane 6 3 9 5 2 7
17 Rutledge Way Magnesia Falls
Drive
22 47 69 10 5 15
18 Rutledge Way Myrsine Avenue 114 91 205 6 6 12
19 Cook Street Aztec Road 33 66 99 15 12 27
20 Cook Street Fred Waring Drive 18 20 38 7 7 14
21 Phyllis Jackson
Lane
Fred Waring Drive 2 5 7 7 5 12
22 Liberty Drive Country Club
Drive
3 1 4 6 2 8
23 Tamarisk Row
Drive
Country Club
Drive
2 0 2 20 2 22
203
Table 9. School Areas Intersection Counts, Vehicles
Intersection
ID
Street 1 Street 2 Vehicles
AM PM Total
1 Portola Avenue Magnesia Falls
Drive
3,826 3,849 7,675
2 Portola Avenue Rutledge Way 2,927 3,193 6,120
3 Park Place Magnesia Falls
Drive
1,060 700 1,760
4 Palm Royale
Drive
Crosswalk in front
of school
565 470 1,035
5 Washington
Street
Fred Waring Drive 9,765 10,607 20,372
6 Washington
Street
Palm Royale Drive 5,844 6,505 12,349
7 Palm Royale
Drive
Fred Waring Drive 4,185 4,365 8,550
8 Shadow
Mountain Drive
Chicory Street 217 210 427
9 Portola Avenue Shadow Mountain
Drive
2,152 2,458 4,610
10 Portola Avenue Fairway Drive 1,844 2,199 4,043
11 Lantana Avenue Peppergrass
Street
79 189 268
12 Warner Trail Evening Star Circle 813 790 1,603
13 Warner Trail Fred Waring Drive 5,344 6,431 11,775
14 Warner Trail Blackfoot Drive 584 628 1,212
15 Portola Avenue Hovley Lane 3,271 3,322 6,593
16 Corporate Way Hovley lane 2,149 2,140 4,289
17 Rutledge Way Magnesia Falls
Drive
1,198 859 2,057
18 Rutledge Way Myrsine Avenue 608 429 1,037
19 Cook Street Aztec Road 4,693 5,030 9,723
20 Cook Street Fred Waring Drive 8,667 9,469 18,136
21 Phyllis Jackson
Lane
Fred Waring Drive 6,351 6,862 13,213
22 Liberty Drive Country Club
Drive
3,823 3,794 7,617
23 Tamarisk Row
Drive
Country Club
Drive
3,775 3,919 7,694
204
Collision Analysis
The analysis of bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicular collisions in Palm Desert uses data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the period January 2013 to December 2022. The collision data was downloaded from Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) and was mapped and analyzed using ArcGIS Pro and Microsoft Excel.

Citywide Collisions
Pedestrian and bicycle-related collisions respectively represent 5.6% (105 collisions) and 6.4% (121 collisions) of all collisions that occurred in Palm Desert between 2013 and 2022 (Figure 21). Two collisions involved both people walking and people biking. The number of pedestrian collisions and vehicle collisions have both increased in recent years (Figure 22), while the number of collisions for people biking has decreased. Similarly, the number of pedestrian and vehicle-related collisions resulting in a fatality or serious injury (killed or seriously injured (KSI)) trended upward for the 10-year period, as shown in Figure 23. In recent years, there have been no bicyclerelated collisions resulting in a fatality or serious injury. The reasons for this trend are unclear, but it could be related to changing travel behaviors during the pandemic years. Most pedestrian and bicycle-related collisions occurred during peak commute hours (38 or 17% at 7AM-10AM, and 52 or 23% at 4PM-7PM), and the majority of KSI collisions involving people biking and walking occurred during low-light conditions such as dusk, dawn, or dark (20 collisions or 56%). Table 10 provides detailed highlights of the citywide KSI collision data.

Figure 21. Collision by Mode – All Collisions in Palm Desert (2013-2022) 205
Figure 22. Collision by Year and Mode – All Collisions in Palm Desert (2013-2022) Figure 23. Collision by Year and Mode – Killed or Severely Injury (KSI) in Palm Desert (2013-2022) 206
Table 10. KSI Collision Data Highlights
Condition Percentage of
Pedestrian and Bicyclerelated KSI Collisions
Lighting
Daylight 44%
Dusk - Dawn 8%
Dark – street lights 28%
Dark – no street lights 19%
Dark – street lights not functioning 0%
Time of Day
00:00-2:59 6%
03:00-05.59 6%

06.00-08:59 14%
09:00-11:59 6%
12:00-14:59 6%
15:00-17:59 25%
18:00-20:59 25%
21:00-23:59 8%
Figure 24 shows a map of collisions involving people biking and walking for the years between 2013-2022 (180 collisions). A high proportion of collisions occurred in the central part of the city, especially along and near Highway 111. Additionally, most collisions occurred on arterial roadways (i.e. major and minor arterials) and 36% of the collisions occurred at intersections. Excessive speed was not cited as a major factor in most collisions, though the highest number of collisions occurred when posted speed limits were 35+ miles per hour. The most common violation categories reported for collisions involving people walking and biking were:
• Pedestrian right-of-way (e.g., people walking failed to yield to the vehicle right-of-way) (20%); • Pedestrian violations (people walking crossed against a red light) (17%); • Automobile right-of-way (people driving failed to yield to the pedestrian or bicyclist right-of-way) (17%); • Traffic Signals and Signs (9%); and
• Wrong Side of Road (i.e., bicyclists riding on the wrong side of the street) (8%). 207
Figure 24. Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions (2013-2022) 208
School Area Collisions
Within a half-mile radius of the eight project schools, between 2013 and 2022, there were 566 collisions of all modes (as shown in Figure 25, lighter yellow symbology purposefully chosen for lesser injury vehicle collisions to highlight non-motorized collisions), with one collision being mapped twice due to its involvement of both a pedestrian and a bicycle. Among these, about 9% involved an active mode (22 or 4% pedestrian-related collisions, and 35 or 6% bicycle-related collisions), and about 14% (80 collisions, all modes) involved school-age children (age 5-18). Figure 26 compares the severity of collisions involving school-age children and all ages.

Results show that about 7% (38 collisions) of all mode collisions resulted in a fatality or serious injury (killed or seriously injured (KSI)), while about 4% (3 collisions) of collisions involving school-age children resulted in KSI.

Furthermore, within the school area, 16% (9 collisions) of active mode collisions resulted in KSI, and one of them involved school-age children.

Most collisions involving school-age children occurred during peak student pick-up and drop-off periods (14 or 18% between 3PM-3:59PM, 13 or 16% between 7AM-7:59AM, and 11 or 14% between 2PM-2:59PM), and most of the collision types were rear-end collisions and broadside collisions. Unsafe speed is the top primary collision factor for collisions within a half-mile radius of the eight project schools (36% of collisions involving school-age children, 34% of collisions involving all ages people). Other common collision factors reported and highlights of the collision data that occurred within the school influence areas are shown in Table 11.

About 33% of collisions (184 collisions) occurred at an intersection within school areas. Out of these collisions, 9% (16 collisions) resulted in a fatality or serious injury, and 15% (27 collisions) involved an active mode of all severities. The top five intersections with the highest collisions of people walking or biking in school influence areas are shown in Table 12.
209
Figure 25. Collisions within a Half-Mile Radius of the Project Schools (2013-2022) 210
Figure 26. Collisions Involving School-age Children by Severity Level, Compared to All Ages – All Collisions (2013-2022) Table 11. School Influence Areas Collision Data Highlights – All Collisions Condition Percentage of Collisions Involving
School-age Children in School Areas
Percentage of Collisions Involving AllAges in School Areas Lighting
Daylight 84% 77%
Dusk - Dawn 4% 2%
Dark – street lights 9% 15%
Dark – no street lights 4% 5%
Dark – street lights not functioning 0% 0%
Time of a Day
00:00-02:59 1% 4%
03:00-05.59 0% 2%

06.00-08:59 21% 16%
09:00-11:59 13% 18%
12:00-14:59 24% 25%
15:00-17:59 28% 20%
18:00-20:59 11% 9%
21:00-23:59 3% 6%
Collision Types
Rear End 46% 41%
Broadside 31% 29%
Sideswipe 8% 8%
Vehicle/Pedestrian 5% 3%
Hit Object 3% 10%
Overturned 3% 3%
Head-On 1% 2%
211
Primary Collision Factor
Unsafe Speed 36% 34%
Traffic Signals and Signs 16% 15%
Automobile Right-of-Way 11% 12%
Improper Turning 9% 12%
Driving or Bicycling Under the Influence
of Alcohol or Drug
6% 6%
Unsafe Starting or Backing 4% 5%
Wrong Side of Road 4% 2%
Unsafe Lane Change 3% 4%
Weather
Clear 96% 93%
Cloudy 4% 6%
Raining 0% 1%
Other Conditions
On State Highways 1% 11%
At Intersections 38% 33%
Alcohol Involvement 4% 8%
Table 12. Top Intersections with the Highest Bicycle and Pedestrian Collisions in School Influence Areas and Corresponding Schools
Intersection Corresponding Schools Number of Collisions KSI Collisions Highway 111 and San Luis Rey Avenue George Washington Charter 4 1 Fred Waring Drive and Portola Avenue Abraham Lincoln Elementary; Palm Desert Charter Middle
2 1
Portola Ave and Alessandro Drive George Washington Charter 2 0 Fred Waring Drive and Deep Canyon
Road
Palm Desert High 2 0
Portola Avenue and Fairway Drive George Washington Charter 2 0 212
This page intentionally left blank
213
Complete
High-Injury
Network
Analysis
B.
214
Complete Palm Desert Safe Routes to School High Injury Network Analysis Introduction
This memo outlines Alta’s approach for the High Injury Network (HIN) analysis. This analysis identifies locations of the most severe crashes and will help inform countermeasure development in a later stage of the project. It builds on previous collision analyses completed for the Safe Routes for Seniors and Safe Routes to Schools plans. The final maps will become part of the Dashboard and Monitoring Tool.

Safety Plan Review
The Existing Conditions memo summarized relevant transportation plans affecting Palm Desert. This section will summarize the plans most relevant to safety, particularly for people walking and biking, as context for the HIN.

Several plans call for citywide improvements to sidewalk and pedestrian infrastructure. The Palm Desert General Plan and Connect SoCal 2024 both call for investments in the bicycle network and improved pedestrian facilities, with an emphasis on safety. The Walk and Roll program also includes sidewalk improvements throughout the city. These investments will provide more safe options for people walking and biking in Palm Desert.

Other plans provide lists of segments and intersections to be prioritized for bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The Transforming Haystack Road: Traffic Calming and Safety Study is focused on a 1.3-mile-long segment of Haystack Road in southern Palm Desert between Highway 74 and Portola Avenue. The project plans to install new crosswalks at several intersections and upgrade signals at the intersection of Highway 74. Meanwhile, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Active Transportation Plan helps to plan for the CV Link regional bike trail. The Local Road Safety Plan and the CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study both identified specific intersections and road segments throughout the city as safety project case studies that should be prioritized for improvement.

Several roadways or intersections from both studies are on the HIN, including areas along Portola Avenue, Monterey Avenue and Fred Waring Drive.

Where specific roadways are highlighted for improvements, Highway 111 stands out as a frequent mention. This road accounts for a significant stretch of the HIN. The Envision Palm Desert Strategic Plan envisions a revitalization of the Highway 111 corridor as well as promotion of non-single occupancy vehicles. Both of these goals provide opportunities to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity along Highway 111 and throughout the city.

The Walk and Roll program plans to install bike lanes throughout the city, including on Highway 111 as well as Country Club Drive, another high-crash roadway. Finally, the CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study names two intersections along Highway 111 as high-scoring projects for regional arterial improvement funding.

Crash Data Overview
These analyses use crash data from 2013 - 2022 from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). This dataset includes over 1,500 injury-causing crashes in the study area, of which 226 involved a person walking or biking.

To help the city focus resources on the most needed safety improvements, this analysis prioritizes crashes that resulted in someone being killed or seriously injured (KSI) but considers minor injury crashes as well. While the High Injury Network considered crashes of all modes, bicycle and pedestrian-involved crashes were given higher priority. 215
High Injury Network (HIN)
Overview and Purpose
High injury networks (HINs) illustrate that often a small number of improvable roadways can address the majority of injury-causing crashes. This approach moves beyond typical crash history and allows for a better understanding of the types of roadways in the city where users are most at risk.

Alta developed an HIN for the City of Palm Desert. This memo explains Alta’s approach to analyzing crash data and developing the HIN. This process is also illustrated in Figure 1. 216
Figure 1: HIN Process
217
Data Inputs
The HIN development used two data sets:

Crashes
Ten-year crash data (2013 – 2022) of all injury-causing crashes within the region, provided by TIMS • Inclusive of all modes of travel
Prepared Roadway Network
Street centerline network for the City of Palm Desert
• Filtered to roadways within a quarter-mile buffer city boundary. • Crashes on Interstate 10 were excluded.

Methodology
Alta prepared two HINs, one prioritizing crashes involving Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs) and one treating all modes equally. The following steps apply to both HINs.

1. Prepare Street Network:
a. Use the “unsplit lines” tool to dissolve road segments based on road name and functional class. This eliminates arbitrary splits in the spatial data so that roads can be split into even-length segments. b. Copy the centerline layer.
c. Divide centerlines into segments of 1000 feet each so that crashes can be summarized for segments of equal length.
d. Create a unique ID for each roadway segment.
e. Create a Rolling Window / Sliding Window feature class where the lines are extended over each road segment. Roadways are extended 25% in each direction. Alta uses custom splitting tools that have an overlap percentage (Wasserman, 2023). Lines overlap with their neighbors by some set percentage.

This process allows rolling window statistics to be calculated on each road segment. The benefits of rolling window analysis are that they reduce the impact that dead-end streets, network segmentation artifacts, or anomalous crashes have on the final HIN. Fundamentally, it better captures the linear corridor crash patterns where they exist (Fitzpatrick, 2018)1. This methodology is illustrated in Figure 2.
1 These patterns would take into account crashes sometimes not directly on a particular segment in other to smooth out analysis results. Examples of this type of analysis are provided by FHWA in their Guide Book on High Pedestrian Crash Locations.
218
Figure 2: The Rolling Window Approach
219

2. Prepare Crash Data:
a. Weight each crash based on the most serious injury sustained by any individual involved in the crash and involvement of vulnerable road users. This effectively prioritizes areas where more serious crashes are occurring to identify areas where the most serious injuries can be reduced. The following proportions are based on a balance between the ratio of the average cost to society from fatal and serious crashes, and the desire not to overweight fatalities that represent sparse events. The goal is to weight severe collisions more highly proportional to their impacts, while not misrepresenting the geography of risk more broadly.2 A different set of weights was used for the Original HIN and the Alternative HIN. The original HIN weighted crashes involving vulnerable road users (VRUs) more heavily. The Alternative HIN also included all crashes but weighted them only by severity and not by mode.

Original HIN weights:
• Fatal or serious-injury crash involving a bicyclist of pedestrian: 8 • Fatal or serious-injury crash involving motor vehicles only: 4 • Minor injury crash involving a bicyclist or pedestrian: 2 • Minor injury crash involving motor vehicles only: 1
Alternative HIN weights:
• Fatal or serious-injury crash of any mode: 4
• Minor injury crash of any mode: 1
b. Snapped all crashes within 350 feet of the street centerline network to a prepared network segment.

This distance accounts for a margin of error in crash coordinates.

3. Apply Rolling Window Analysis:
a. Spatially join the crash layer to the rolling window road network. b. Calculate the summed rolling crash weight for each rolling road segment. This summed the weight of crashes on each rolling segment and reflected total crash severity on each segment. c. Join the rolling crash weight from the rolling window layer back to the original centerline network to show rolling crash weight per road mile on each segment, using the unique ID. This normalized the crash weight for the road length. However, for the purpose of calculating crash weight per road mile, the project team counted any rolled segments of less than 0.1 miles as 0.1 miles to avoid overrepresenting crashes on small road segments, as dividing by very small numbers yields very large numbers. See Figure 4 for an explanation of the process. d. This process creates a crash severity index which when mapped is similar to a heat map. 2 There are many calculations of average cost of severe and fatal crashes. The ratio shown here is based on the FHWA’s Crash Costs for Safety Analysis (Harmon et al, 2018), tables 14 and 19. The weights shown here are roughly proportional to the log of costs to society of each type of crash compared with a baseline of property damage-only collisions. Source:
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/docs/fhwasa17071.pdf.
220

4. Accumulate Crashes:
a. Beginning with segments with the highest crash weight per mile, use Alta’s custom-built HIN Generation tool to progressively add segments to the HIN. This tool calculates the length in miles for each segment as it is added and keeps track of the cumulative miles in the HIN and the number of crashes occurring on those segments. It stops when the designated threshold of crashes has been accumulated. The tool also generates a table that shows the number of crashes and the number of roadway miles accounted for with each HIN segment.
b. The project team charted the percent accumulated length and the percent accumulated crashes seen in
c. Figure 3 for the original HIN. The project team deemed that the slope begins to increase around the point at which 43% of crashes have been accumulated. At this point it was determined continuing to add segments to the network would have diminishing returns in terms of capturing more crashes.

This inflection point helped decide the threshold for the percentage of crashes included in the HIN.

Since the segments with the most severe crashes get selected for the HIN first, adding additional segments would have had diminishing returns. Thus, the threshold helped strike a balance between accounting for as many crashes as possible while limiting the number of segments selected for the HIN. The goal is to find the smallest share of the roadway network that accounts for the largest number of severe crashes.

Figure 3: Graph of Accumulated Crashes and Accumulated Length. Crashes selected for the HIN are Represented in Red. 221

5. Final Refinement:
a. Calculated the percent of roadway miles and the percent of crashes accounted for in the final HIN.

These percentages show decision makers that safety investments in a small share of the road network can help to prevent many crashes in the region.

Resulting Maps
Figure 4 and Figure 5 display both the Original HIN as well as the Alternative HIN. A conclusion section follows, and a table of each segment on the Original HIN, its crash index, and its to/from extents is located in Table 3 in the Appendix.
222
Figure 4: Original HIN Network – VRU crashes emphasized 223
Figure 5: Alternative HIN Network – All Modes Weighted Equally 224
Conclusions
Figure 4 and Figure 5 display the results from the Original HIN and Alternative HIN processes, identifying the most high-crash road segments in Palm Desert. Figure 4 includes results from the Original HIN approach (bicycle and pedestrian crashes weighted higher). Figure 5 includes results from the Alternative HIN approach (weighting auto and VRU crashes equally). Both maps demonstrate that the most high-crash road segments in Palm Desert are concentrated in the downtown area. These roadways include Highway 74, Highway 111, San Pablo Avenue and Town Center Way in the downtown area. Other than in the Downtown Area, HIN segments are found along Highway 74 to the South, Monterey Avenue to the West, Portola Avenue to the North, and Holey Lane, Washington Street and Country Club Drive to the East.

Although both figures are quite similar, the differences between the two datasets present valuable information on the unique experience of bicycle and pedestrian users. Most notably, there are different segments included in Figure 4, indicating that pedestrian and bicycle crash locations do not always correspond to those of automobiles. The intersection at Fred Waring Drive and Town Center Way and immediate surrounding area is an example of a road segment in the original HIN that is not present in the Alternative HIN. Furthermore, the top five segments of the original HIN are also different. Although the same segments appear for both HIN analyses, they are not the same rank for both networks. Table 1 displays these results:

Table 1: Top Five Most High-Crash Segments per HIN
Order Original HIN (VRUs weighted more heavily) Alternative HIN (Equal weighting) 1 Monterey Ave (From Dinah Shore Dr to I-10/City
Limits)
Monterey Ave (From Dinah Shore Dr to I-10)
2 Highway 74 (El Paseo to Highway 111) Fred Waring Dr (From Painters Path to Highway 111)
3 Fred Waring Dr (From Painters Path to Highway 111) Highway 111 (From San Luis Rey Ave to Portola Ave)
4 Highway 111 (From San Luis Rey Ave to Portola Ave) Country Club Dr (From Harris Ln to Washington St) 5 Country Club Dr (From Harris Ln to Washington St) Highway 74 (El Paseo to Highway 111) Table 1 highlights some streets that have been called out in the Existing Conditions memo and local safety plans.

Highway 111 and Fred Waring Drive were noted in the EC memo as lacking sufficient crossings and facilities for people walking and biking. Highway 111 is also served by SunBus service, which generates pedestrian trips to and from bus stops. Fred Waring Drive, on the other hand, has bicycle facilities proposed in the Palm Desert General Plan which may help address safety concerns there.

The segments of Monterey Avenue and Highway 111 mentioned in this table encompass segments and intersections identified in the Local Road Safety Plan as safety project case studies. The Country Club Drive segment is also a part of the highest-scoring segment in the CVAG Transportation Project Prioritization Study.

Country Club Drive and Highway 111 are also roads identified in the Walk and Roll Program as candidates for Class II bike lanes.
225
The table also suggests that countermeasures that explicitly address automobile crash reductions will not necessarily aid in reducing impacts to VRUs. Although the two HINs are similar, the Alternative Weight HIN does not fully capture pedestrian and bicycle crashes. However, it should also be noted that due to higher numbers of motor vehicle crashes than VRU crashes, the original HIN is still most heavily influenced by the locations of motor vehicle crashes and does not necessarily reflect the areas that present the highest risk to VRUs.

Community Summary
Alta also analyzed demographic information for the community living within a quarter mile of each HIN. The information, found below in Table 2, was sourced from the 2021 US Census American Community Survey at the block group level. This was done using a proportional allocation process which assumes that the population within a block group is evenly distributed, allowing us to make inferences about the population closest to the HIN, which may encompass only part of a block group. Figure 6 provides a graphic explanation of the proportional allocation concept.

Table 2: General Statistics of Communities Within 1/4 Mile of HIN Network Statistic within ¼ mile of
HIN Segments
Original HIN Alternative HIN Palm Desert Overall
Population 38,912 37,462 51,951
Percent of workers who walk,
ride a bicycle, or take public
transit to work

5.5% 6.2% 2.7%
Percent of population in
poverty (%)

13.9% 14.2% 12.9%
Table 2 shows that most of Palm Desert’s residents live within a quarter mile of at least one HIN segment, and these residents are slightly more likely to live in poverty or (if they are part of the working population) to commute to work via walking, biking, or public transit.
226
References
Harmon, T., G. Bahar, and F. Gross (2018). Crash Costs for Highway Safety Analysis. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Available at https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/docs/fhwasa17071.pdf.

Fitzpatrick, K. A. (2018). Guidebook on Identification of High Pedestrian Crash Locations. FHWA-HRT-17-106.

Supplemental Material. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Research and Development.

Wasserman, D. (2023, March 30). Study-Line-Editor. Portland, OR, USA. Retrieved from https://github.com/dwasserman/study-line-editor/tree/dev Appendix
Table 3: Segments on the Original HIN, by crash severity index Segment Street Name From To Crash Severity Index
Monterey Avenue Dinah Shore Drive Highway 10 280.60
Highway 74 El Paseo Highway 111 214.13
Fred Waring Drive Painters Path Highway 111 191.96
Highway 111 San Luis Rey Avenue Portola Ave 191.09
Country Club Drive Harris Lane Washington Street 190.80 Highway 111 Larkspur Lane San Luis Rey Avenue 187.49
Figure 6: Proportional Allocation Process Illustration
227
Segment Street Name From To Crash Severity Index
Monterey Avenue
405ft North Of San
Gorgonio Way Highway 111 178.02
San Pablo Avenue
College Of The Desert
Driveway Fred Waring Drive 165.85
Portola Avenue 182ft North Of El Paseo Shadow Mountain Drive 165.22 Town Center Way
239ft North Of Hahn
Road Highway 111 164.25
San Pablo Avenue San Gorgonio Way San Gorgonio Way 160.00 Highway 111 Shadow Hills Road Palm Desert Drive 151.43
Monterey Avenue
414ft North Of Fred
Waring Drive
606ft South Of Fred
Waring Drive 144.90
Highway 111 De Anza Way Shadow Hills Road 140.61
San Pablo Avenue
228 Ft North Of Fred
Waring
83 Ft North Fo Catalina
Way 131.47
Highway 111 Palm Desert Drive South Sage Lane 118.98
Country Club Drive
97 Ft West Of Harris
Lane
183 Ft West Of Eastwood
Lane 116.60
Highway 111
455ft Southeast Of
Fredwaring Dr
973ft Northwest Of El
Paseo 115.38
Highway 111 Sage Lane San Pablo Avenue 111.77
Washington Street Fred Waring Drive
360 Ft North Of Calle Las
Brisas South 109.96
Fred Waring Drive
43 Ft East Of San Luis
Drive
337 Ft East Of Monterey
Avenue 108.03
Highway 111 Cabrillo Avenue De Anza Way 104.56
Monterey Avenue Park View Drive
414ft North Of Fred
Waring Drive 100.05
Portola Avenue
653ft North Of Gerald
Ford Drive
388ft South Of Geral D
Ford Drive 98.05
Highway 111
662 Ft South Of Painters
Path
1,993 Ft North Of El
Paseo 97.35
Fred Waring Drive
90 Ft West Of San
Anselmo Avenue
338 East Of Monterey
Avenue 97.23
Highway 74 El Paseo Pitahaya Street 94.26
Monterey Avenue
606ft South Of Fred
Waring Drive
405ft North Of San
Gorgonio Way 93.15
228
Segment Street Name From To Crash Severity Index
Washington Street Country Club Drive Emerald Crest Drive 92.37 Highway 111
493 Ft East Of Plaza
Way Palm Desert Drive 86.53
Fred Waring Drive
422ft West Of Town
Center Way
270ft West Of Fairhaven
Drive 86.42
Hovley Lane E 370ft West Of Idaho St Washington Street 84.79 Portola Avenue 182ft North Of El Paseo Shadow Mountain Drive 84.45 Portola Avenue
224ft North Of Rancho
Road Santa Rosa Way 84.45
Highway 111 El Paseo 982 Ft North Of El Paseo 82.93
Highway 111
973ft Northwest Of El
Paseo El Paseo 82.93
Fred Waring Drive
270ft West Of Fairhaven
Drive San Luis Drive 82.82
Highway 111
314 Ft North Of Park
View Drive
522 Ft North Of Fred
Waring Dr 82.21
Highway 74 Willow Street Frank Feltrop Drive 82.12
San Pablo Avenue San Gorgonio Way El Paseo 80.70
Highway 111 El Paseo
483 Ft West Of Plaza
Way 79.32
Highway 111 San Pablo Avenue Larkspur Lane 79.32
Highway 111
487 Ft West Of Plaza
Way 500 Ft East Of Plaza Way 79.32
Town Center Way Fred Waring Drive
239ft North Of Hahn
Road 78.02
Washington Street
68 Ft North Of Tuscon
Circle
359 Ft North Of Calle Las
Brisas South 76.97
229
Complete
Outreach and
Engagement
Report
C.
230
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 1 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Complete Palm Desert Safe Routes to School Outreach and Engagement Report
This report provides an overview of the outreach and engagement activities conducted as part of the development of the Palm Desert Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Plan. Engaging with key stakeholders, including families, school staff, and the broader community, was essential in shaping recommendations that reflect local needs and concerns.

Outreach and Engagement Overview
Outreach for the SRTS Plan was conducted in two phases. Phase I occurred in spring 2023 and focused on listening to community needs and concerns, including the collection of existing conditions data. Phase II occurred in fall 2024 and focused on gathering community feedback on draft recommendations.

Outreach activities included workshops, walk audits, pop-ups, and virtual webinars. The Project Team established an Advisory Committee that met throughout the duration of the project, and distributed surveys to collect information from the school community. A project website (https://www.engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero) was also created to disseminate project information, promote events, and gather feedback from those unable to participate in in-person outreach activities. This holistic outreach approach ensured robust community input and feedback throughout the development of the SRTS Plan.

Activities were advertised through project and event flyers, social media posts, and the project website. Upcoming SRTS events, such as the school walk audits, were also highlighted at community presentations. Promotional materials, such as flyers, were created in English and Spanish.

Palm Desert Advisory Committee
The City established a Palm Desert Advisory Committee to be a guiding body for the SRTS Plan development process.

Participants included representatives from:
• City of Palm Desert
• City of Indian Wells
• City of La Quinta
• Coachella Valley Association of Governments
• Desert Recreation District
• Riverside County Sheriff’s Office
• The Joslyn Center
The Advisory Committee met three times over the course of the project. At the first meeting, the Project Team introduced the SRTS Plan, shared existing conditions findings, and discussed upcoming outreach and engagement opportunities. To support the proposed outreach and engagement strategy, committee members offered to assist distribute project materials through their organizations.

The second meeting included an overview of completed public outreach to-date, and a discussion of bicycle and pedestrian facilities under consideration for the forthcoming SRTS recommendations. The Committee shared that La 231
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 2 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Quinta is already implementing active transportation improvements, including near one of the project schools (Paige Middle School). The City of Palm Desert also shared that many existing crosswalks were already being upgraded to high-visibility crosswalks, and to note this in the SRTS Plan.

The last meeting provided a project status update, an overview of the SRTS recommendations, and a discussion of SRTS project prioritization. The Committee requested the Project Team consider the Coachella Valley Association of Governments’ Active Transportation Design Guidelines (2021), the CV Link Master Plan (2016), and AB43 (a new law allowing local governments to lower speed limits on major streets) in the SRTS Plan. The Committee also asked to include street width as a factor for the SRTS Prioritization Methodology.

Phase I – Existing Conditions
Lincoln Elementary School / Palm Desert Charter Middle Walk Audit and Workshop April 9, 2024
Palm Desert Charter Middle School
Attendees: 15
The Project Team organized, promoted, and presented at a joint Lincoln Elementary School and Palm Desert Charter Middle School walk audit and workshop on April 9, 2024. This marked the beginning of the SRTS walk audit process for the City of Palm Desert.

During the walk audit, school principals, security personnel, and other school staff provided input on the safety and comfort of the roads near each school. The walk audit was paired with afternoon student pick-up observations for both schools where the Project Team observed traffic circulation and driver behavior. Photo documentation of existing conditions on streets around both schools was also collected.

A workshop for both schools followed the walk audit on the evening of April 9th. In attendance were the Project Team, the Mayor of Palm Desert, Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Charter Middle principals, the Desert Sands Unified School District, Lincoln Elementary and Palm Desert Charter Middle parents and caregivers, and school staff.

The purpose of this workshop was to provide general information about the Palm Desert SRTS Plan and answer questions regarding the Plan’s development, components, goals, and timeline. Spanish interpretation was provided by a third-party service called Interpreters Unlimited, though no attendees ultimately required interpretation.

Following a brief presentation, participants were encouraged to provide feedback on the safety of roads around their schools via a question and answer session and by marking up poster-sized aerial maps that displayed both schools.

Feedback included concerns about sidewalk and bicycle network gaps, high speeds on streets around schools, and ADA barriers such as trash cans blocking sidewalk access. Overall, attendees were very receptive to and supportive of the SRTS Plan and were thankful to the City for taking a proactive effort towards making it safer and more convenient to walk and bike in Palm Desert.
232
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 3 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Safe Routes to School Virtual Webinar
April 15, 2024
Zoom Meeting
Attendees: 10
The Project Team hosted a virtual webinar on April 15, 2024, to present on the SRTS Plan to Palm Desert families. The meeting was held via Zoom, an online platform that hosts virtual meetings. The purpose of this virtual webinar was to provide general information regarding the SRTS Plan and raise awareness of the Plan’s upcoming school walk audits.

Participants expressed interest in the Plan and appreciated the City’s focus on improving safety for Palm Desert students.

Safe Routes to School Walk Audits
Ford Elementary School – April 17, 2024, 9:05 am – 10:05 am Carter Elementary School – April 17, 2024, 3:00 pm – 4:00 pm Palm Desert High School – April 18, 2024, 8:35 am – 9:35 am Washington Charter School – April 30, 2024, 8:20 am – 9:20 am Paige Middle School – May 1, 2024, 8:35 am – 9:35 am
Reagan Elementary School – May 2, 2024, 8:05 am – 9:05 am Attendees: Approximately 1-6 per walk audit
The Project Team hosted one walk audit at each of the schools included in the Palm Desert SRTS Plan. The purpose of the walk audits was to collect feedback regarding roadway safety around schools from school staff, parents, and caregivers, document existing conditions, and observe morning drop-off or afternoon pick-up traffic circulation and driver behavior.

The walk audit began with introductions and an overview of the purpose of each walk audit. A large aerial map of the school and surrounding area was also provided to gather participants’ initial thoughts regarding roadway safety. The walk audit continued with a 30-45-minute walk around the school and along local streets, with particular attention given to streets identified as problematic by walk audit participants.

At least one participant from each school attended each walk audit, typically a school principal or other administrator, a school resource officer or security officer, and/or a Crossing Guard. Three parents were also in attendance for the Washington Charter School walk audit and a Desert Sands Unified School District representative was present at the Palm Desert High School audit. A City of La Quinta engineer attended the Paige Middle School audit as it is located within the City of La Quinta. Common concerns across all schools included high speeds along nearby streets, traffic congestion spilling into public streets during morning drop-off and afternoon pick-up, drivers disobeying Crossing Guards, and generally feeling unsafe bicycling using existing bike facilities in Palm Desert.

Following each audit, participants were encouraged to keep up to date with the project via a flyer that contained information about the SRTS Plan and the larger Palm Desert Vision Zero Strategy, as well as a link to the project website (https://www.engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero). Some participants offered additional feedback to the 233
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 4 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Project Team following the walk audit, which was then compiled into the SRTS Plan’s Walk Audit Report along with the information gathered the day of each audit.

Safe Routes to School Student Tallies
May – June 2024
Participation: 84 classrooms
The Project Team used an electronic version of the standard Student Travel Tally form developed by the National Center for SRTS to collect student travel modes at all project schools. Tally forms were sent to each school following the completion of all school walk audits, in spring 2024, with teachers administering the tallies via an online link.

Teachers asked their students which transportation mode they took to get to school and which mode they will take to get home. The tally also recorded grade level, class size, and weather conditions on the day of the tally.

Eighty-four (84) classrooms participated in the student tally. However, only Lincoln Elementary, Ford Elementary, and Regan Elementary School submitted data.

Figure 1 and Figure 2 illustrate responses to the tally questions “How did you arrive at school today?” and “How do you plan to leave for home after school?”, respectively. Please note that while the Project Team received tally data from about 80 classrooms, only three elementary schools participated.

Figure 1. Survey Responses to "How did you arrive at school today?" 234
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 5 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Figure 2. Survey Responses to "How do you plan to leave for home after school?" In general, family vehicles are the most common mode of transportation among students. This may be cause for high traffic volumes around each school.

The survey also asked teachers to record the date and weather conditions the tally was taken. 95.2% of classrooms recorded “sunny” when the tally was taken, a factor that may impact the desire to walk or bike to school, particularly on warm days. The distribution of grade levels was relatively even across elementary grade levels (kindergarten through fifth grade); however, representation of data from only younger students may be a factor for low walking and biking rates.

Safe Routes to School Parent/Caregiver Surveys
May – June 2024
Participation: 173 surveys
Parents’/caregivers’ knowledge and attitudes about their student’s travel habits, including walking and biking to school, were analyzed from the parent surveys collected during the project. The survey was an online questionnaire (derived from the National Center for SRTS survey and available in English and Spanish) sent to all parents included in the list of project schools.

The survey asked parents and caregivers how their student currently travels to and from school, the distance their family lives from school, challenges associated with walking and biking, and their overall attitudes toward active modes of transportation. The survey also asked what grades their children are enrolled in, whether their children have asked to walk or bike in the past year, and whether they believe their children’s schools encourage or discourage walking to and from school.
235
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 6 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report One hundred seventy-three (173) surveys were submitted, representing all eight schools included in the Palm Desert SRTS Plan.

Figure 3. Survey responses to “How far does your student live from school?” As Figure 3 shows, 33.3% of respondents live ½ mile or less away from school, which is considered a comfortable walking distance. 44.1% of parents also shared that living too far away from school is one of the main reasons they do not allow their student to walk and bike to/from school. Additionally, the data showed the majority of students arrived and departed school via a family vehicle (85.1% and 83.3% of total responses, respectively), and 10.5% of students walked to school and 8.8% walked home from school. This compares to approximately 10.4% of students who walk to and from school nationally (Source: National Household Travel Survey). 236
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 7 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Figure 4. Parents’/Caregivers’ Top Concerns for Walking or Biking to School Parents and caregivers also shared a number of concerns influencing their decision to not allow their student to walk or bike to/from school. Figure 4 shows the top five concerns shared by parents and caregivers. The biggest concerns were speeding and too much traffic along routes to school followed closely by unsafe intersections. This demonstrates a need for traffic calming efforts and better intersection controls like crosswalks and Crossing Guards.

Parents and caregivers also stated “stranger danger” as a main concern. SRTS activities like walking school buses could help address this concern by providing safety in numbers for walking groups of students, parents/caregivers, and school staff.

37.7% of parents and caregivers also stated they would not feel comfortable allowing their students to walk or bike to school without an adult at any grade, and only 34.2% of respondents stated their child has asked for permission to walk or bike to school in the past year. Most respondents (46.5%) also stated it takes their student 5-10 minutes to get to or from school, and 85.9% of parents and caregivers believe their school neither encourages nor discourages walking and biking to and from school.
237
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 8 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Phase II – Review of Recommendations
City of Palm Desert Open Houses
October 15, 2024 & October 17, 2024
Attendees: 23
To complement the Project Team’s engagement effort, staff from the City of Palm Desert conducted independent, targeted outreach to gather additional community input on bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements. To ensure meaningful engagement, the City mailed 6,329 letters directly to Palm Desert residents, inviting them to attend one of two open house meetings held on October 15 and October 17, 2024.

These meetings provided an opportunity for residents to share their perspectives on critical safety and accessibility issues. A total of 23 attendees participated, offering valuable feedback such as:
• The need to address high vehicular speeds
• Requests for additional sidewalks and safety measures in South Palm Desert (e.g., Grapevine Street) • Concerns about unsafe pedestrian access across Washington Street • Calls for more bicycle- and pedestrian-friendly roads throughout Palm Desert • Suggestions to slow vehicles in residential areas of South Palm Desert • A need for safer bicycling conditions on Highway 111
• Improved maintenance of sidewalks and bike lanes to keep them clear of debris • Expansion of bike lanes where feasible
• A request for crosswalks on Shadow Mountain at Lupine Lane • Extend the sidewalk on Portola Avenue through the intersection near the Vintage entrance Safe Routes to School Virtual Recommendations Workshop
December 17, 2024
Zoom Meeting
Attendees: 4
The Project Team hosted a virtual workshop on December 17, 2024, to present draft SRTS recommendations to the school community. To advertise the workshop, the City of Palm Desert utilized Peach Jar, an online school flyer distribution service, to email more than 7,000 flyers to parents and caregivers. An additional 3,600 postcards with information about the workshop were mailed to residences located near the project schools.

The presentation included a brief overview of the purpose of the SRTS Plan, a summary of findings from completed community engagement, and an explanation of how the draft recommendations were developed. The presentation concluded with an overview of proposed recommendations at three schools (Lincoln Elementary School, Palm Desert 238
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 9 Complete Palm Desert SRTS Outreach and Engagement Report Charter Middle School, and Washington Charter School), and an explanation of how residents can provide their input on the draft recommendations via the project website.

The Community Input Opportunities section of the project website (https://www.engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero) includes a recording of the Safe Routes to School Virtual Recommendations Workshop. 239
Crossing
Guard
Promotional
Social Media
Posts in
English and
Spanish
D.
240

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PALM DESERT
241
Please Pull
Forward
Signage in
English and
Spanish
E.
242

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PALM DESERT
Please Pull
Forward
Por favor,
conduzca
hacia
adelante
243
Safe Routes
to School
Banner in
English and
Spanish
F.
244

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PALM DESERT
Palm Desert Schools Walk & Roll
Las Escuelas de Palm Desert Caminan y Ruedan
245
Suggested
Routes
to School
Maps for
Palm Desert
Schools
G.
246
This page intentionally left blank
247
CO
N
EJ
O
C
RI C
LE

CAMINO ARROYO

SANTA ROSA WAY

PRESIDIO
PLACE
E
U
N
E
VA
OLB
AP
N
A
S

RANCHO ROAD

MASSON STREET
E
U
N
E
VA LA
U
C
S
AP
N
A
S
KRUG A

CALLE DEL VERANO

MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Palm Desert
Civic Center
Park
Use caut
when cross
these ar
large and b
intersectio
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~17 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~7 minute

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Use caut
when cross
these ar
large and b
intersectio
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~17 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~7 minute

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
A pedestrian
bridge provides
access to Civic
Center Park.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
LEGEND
Intersection with Traffic Signal
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
Suggested Walk to School Route —
Use Extreme Caution: Missing Sidewalk
Magnesia Falls Dr
Portola Ave
Rutledge Way
248
D
A
O
R
N
O
Y
N
A
C
P
E
E
D

FRED WARING DRIVE

KING FISHER CIRCLE
YO
ELC
RI C
E
TI R
U
Z
A

PRIMROSE DRIVE
E
N

AL NI D
R
E
V
E
U
N
E
VA
E
NI R
OLF

GARY AVENUE

QUICKSILVER DRIVE MERLE DRIVE

RUTLEDGE WAY

BUTTONWOOD DRIVE
ELC IR
C
A
D
AV
E
N
SILKT
R
E
E LA
N
E
E
U
N
E
VA
ALO
T
R
O
P
D

LESLIE AVENUE
OLLI C
E
T
N
O
M
O
E
S
AP

SANTOLINA DRIVE

MERCURY CIRCLE
D
A
O
R
A
C
C
E
B
E
R
S
UTTERS

MILL ROAD

LAVENDER WAY

MOSS ROSE DRIVE

VIA PALMIRA

ERIN STREET

ASTER DRIVE
AVENUE
ZIRCON
CIRC
LE

COLUMBINEDR VI E
D
A
O
R IE
D
O
B
M
A
RIG
O

LD DRIVE

GOLETA AVENUE

MYRSINE AVENUE

VELARDO DRIVE

DESERT STAR BOULEVARD
Abraham
Lincoln
Elementary
Palm Desert
Charter
Middle School
Magnesia Falls Park
Use caution when walking
on Primrose Drive; there is
a sidewalk gap and most
intersections lack crosswalks.
ion
sing;
re
busy
ons.

Use caution when
walking on Deep Canyon
Road; most intersections
lack crosswalks and
north-south traffic does
not have stop signs.
es

0.25 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
1 mile
from school

0.5 miles
from school
1 mile
from school
Use caution when walking
on Primrose Drive; there is
a sidewalk gap and most
intersections lack crosswalks.
ion
sing;
re
busy
ons.

Use caution when
walking on Deep Canyon
Road; most intersections
lack crosswalks and
north-south traffic does
not have stop signs.
es

0.25 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
1 mile
from school

0.5 miles
from school
1 mile
from school
~20 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Use caution when
crossing; traffic on
Rutledge Way does
not have stop signs.
249

MISSOURI DRIVE
LI A
R
T
R
E
N
R
A
W
CALLE
LAS
B
R
SI AS

EDINBOROUGH STREET

TUCSON CIRCLE
E
N
AL A
H IS
TAL

VIA GIBRALTAR

ROBIN ROAD

MOUNTAIN VIEW

DELAWARE PLAC

CALIFORNIA DRIVE

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS

CITY OF PALM DESERT
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Use caution w
crossing; this is
and busy inters

0.5 from
~10 minut

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Ford
Elementary
School

COLONEL MITCHELL

PAIGE MIDDLE SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
LEGEND
Intersection with Traffic Signal
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
Darby Rd
Washington St
Palm Royale Dr
250

HIDDEN RIVER ROAD
CE

FRED WARING DRIVE

CITY OF LA QUINTA

WASHINGTONS TREET

PALM ROYALE DRIVE

DARBY ROAD

STARLIGHT LANE

TORINO DRIVE VENICE DRIVE

NAPLES DRIVE

LIMA HALL ROAD

SAND BAY ROAD
Colonel
Mitchell
Paige Middle
Horizon School
Activate the rectangular rapid
flashing beacon by pressing
the button and make sure
traffic stops before crossing.
when
a large
section.
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~5 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
5 miles
m school
tes
251
S
A
N
C
A
R
L
O
S
AVENUE
E
U
N
E
VA
OLB
AP
N
A
S
EL PA

GRAPEVINE STREET

SHADOW MOUNTA

MARRAKE

SHADOW LAKE DRIVE
COTTAG
E LA
N
E
E
N
AL D
E
E
W
O
R
R
U
B

JOSHUA TREE STREET

IRONWOOD STREET

CLUB CIRCLE
AL

PINYON STREET

JUNIPER STREET

GOLF COURSE LANE

AMIR DRIVE

KASBAH D

WHITE S

SAN LUIS REY AVENUE
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Use c
walkin
Mounta
some s
Use ca
walking o
this is a ma
lots
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school

GEORGE WASHINGTON

CHARTER SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
LEGEND
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
Intersection with Traffic Signal
Suggested Walk to School Route —
Use Extreme Caution: Missing Sidewalk
Chicory St
Portola Ave
Lantana Ave
252
Ä111
D
E
E
P
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
O
A
D
E
U
N
E
VA
ALO
T
R
O
P
E
U
N
E
VA
OLLI R
B
A
C

DE ANZA WAY
ASEO

IN DRIVE

FAIRWAY DRIVE
S
H
A
D
O
W
HILLS
ROAD
E
N
AL E
SI R
N
U
S
PA
N
O
RAMA
DRIVE

ESH DRIVE

DRIFTWOOD DRIVE

PEPPERGRASS STREET

PALM DESERT DRIVE

PAROSELLA STREET
EUNEVA

ANATNAL

CANDLEWOOD STREET
A
B
R
O

NIA TRAIL
E
U
N
E
VA
H
S
U
R
BLI A
U
Q

EL CAMINO

LESSANDRO DRIVE

COVERED WAGON TRAIL
E
U
N
E
VA
W
EI V
NI AT
N
U
O
M

SUNSET LANE

OLD PROSPECTOR TRAIL

CHICORY STREET

FLAGSTONE LANE
RIVE

SETTING SUN TRAIL

PEPPER TREE DRIVE

STONE LANE

YUCCA TREE DRIVE

BLACK RABBIT ROAD
George
Washington
Charter

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
Use extreme caution if
walking on streets in nearby
neighborhoods; most streets
here lack sidewalks. Consider
walking with an adult.
caution when
ng on Shadow
in Dr; there are
sidewalk gaps.
ution when
n Portola Ave;
ajor street with
of traffic.

Use caution when crossing;
there is no crosswalk and
traffic on Candlewood St
does not have a stop sign.
~5 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~5 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~13 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
253

ILL NI O
SI AV
E
N
U
E
WYOM

ELKHORN TRAIL

TENNESSE
E
AV
E
N
U
E

CALIFORNIA AVENUE

FLORIDA AVENUE

INDIANA AVENUE

FRED WARING DRIVE
LO

UISIANA STREET
EVEN
BLA
CH

ELKHORN TRAIL
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Use c
walking
there is
near
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~5 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
GERALD R. FORD

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
LEGEND
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
Intersection with Traffic Signal
Suggested Walk to School Route —
Use Extreme Caution: Missing Sidewalk
Fred Waring Dr
Warner Trl
254
LI A
R
T
R
E
N
R
A
W

LISBON WAY

OMING AVENUE
E
U
N
E
VA
S
A
X
E
T

TUCSON CIRCLE

VIA GIBRALTAR

ROBIN ROAD

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
LI A
R
T
R
E
N
R
A
W

MILES AVENUE

NING STAR CIRCLE

ACKFOOT DRIVE

EYENNE DRIVE

WASHINGTON STREET

CALLE LAS BRISAS S
Gerald R. Ford
Elementary
Indian Wells
Tennis Garden
Use caution when
crossing; north-south
traffic on Warner Trail
does not have stop signs.
~4 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Use caution when
crossing; this is a wide
and busy intersection.
caution when
on Elkhorn Trail;
s a sidewalk gap
Louisiana St.

0.5 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Use caution when
walking on Fred Waring
Dr; this is a major street
with lots of traffic.
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
1 mile
from school
Use caution
when walking on
Washington St; this
is a major street with
lots of traffic.

Paige Middle
School
255

CHAPARRAL DRIVE
C O
U
R
T

SI D E DRIVE

PRESIDIO PLACE
JOYA
DRIVE
C
A
MIN
O
A
R
R
O
Y
O

SAN REMO
E
U
N
E
VA
ALO
T
R
O
P
T
R
U
O
C
ATA
N
O
S

ADACRA A ID NEVA

CONEJO CIRCLE

CAMISA LANE

WILLOW LAKE DRIVE

HOVLEY LANE W

SIERRA MADRE
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Use caution when
crossing; this is a wide
and busy intersection.
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school

0.25 miles
from school

0.5 miles
from school
1 mile
from school

JAMES EARL CARTER

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
LEGEND
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
Intersection with Traffic Signal
Hovley Ln E
Portola Ave
256

KING FISHER CIRCLE

FALCON LANE

QUICKSILVER DRIVE MERLE DRIVE
IO
G
E
R
A IA
V
N
EVA
D
A
CIR
CLE

ZIRCON CIRCLE

ANGELS CAMP ROAD
D
A
O
R IE
D
O
B
S
UTTERS

MILL ROAD
E
N

AL NI D
R
E
V

VIA VENEZIA

LESLIE AVENUE
MERCU
RY
CIR
CLE
42ND AVENUE
E
U
N
E
VA
ALO
T
R
O
P
YA

WETAROPROC
O IS
V
E
R
T IA
V

JASMINE COURT
E
N
AL ELG
A
E
N
E
DLO
G

VIA LANTANA

VIA PELLESTRINA

AZURITE CIRCLE

HOVLEY LANE E
James Earl Carter
Elementary
Use caution when walking
on Portola Ave and Hovley
Ln; these streets often have
lots of traffic.

Hovley
Soccer Park
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~6 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
257

CONEJO CIRC
L
E

CAMINO ARROYO

SANTA ROSA WAY

PRESIDIO
PLACE

RANCHO ROAD

MASSON STREET

MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE
E
U
N
E
VA LA
U
C
S
AP
N
A
S

KRUG AVENUE
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Palm Desert
Civic Center
Park
Use caution
when crossing;
these are
large and busy
intersections.
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
A pedestrian
bridge provides
access to Civic
Center Park.

PALM DESERT CHARTER

MIDDLE SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
LEGEND
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
Intersection with Traffic Signal
Suggested Walk to School Route —
Use Extreme Caution: Missing Sidewalk
CV Link
Magnesia Falls Dr
Portola Ave
Rutledge Way
258
D
A
O
R
N
O
Y
N
A
C
P
E
E
D

KING FISHER CIRCLE
ELC
RI C
E
TI R
U
Z
A

PRIMROSE DRIVE
E
N

AL NI D
R
E
V
E
U
N
E
VA
E
NI R
OLF

GARY AVENUE

QUICKSILVER DRIVE MERLE DRIVE

FRED WARING DRIVE

RUTLEDGE WAY

BUTTONWOOD DRIVE
P
H

YLL SI J
A
C
K
S
O
N LA
N
E
ELC IR
C
A
D
AV
E
N
SILKT
R
E
E LA
N
E
E
U
N
E
VA
ALO
T
R
O
P

LESLIE AVENUE
YA

W IS LLY
R
A
M
A
A
N
AT
N

AL ELLA
C
OLLI C
E
T
N
O
M
O
E
S
AP

SANTOLINA DRIVE

MERCURY CIRCLE
D
A
O
R
A
C
C
E
B
E
R
SUTTE
R
S

MILL ROAD

LAVENDER WAY

MOSS ROSE DRIVE

VIA PALMIRA

ERIN STREET

ASTER DRIVE
ELC IR
C
N
O
C IR
Z

COLUMBINEDR VI E
D
A
O
R IE
D
O
B
M
A
RIG
O

LD DRIVE

GOLETA AVENUE

VELARDO DRIVE

MYRSINE AVENUE

DESERT STAR BOULEVARD
Palm Desert
Charter
Middle
Magnesia Falls
Park
Lincoln
Elementary
School
Use caution when walking
on Primrose Drive; there is
a sidewalk gap and most
intersections lack crosswalks.

Use caution when
walking on Deep Canyon
Road; most intersections
lack crosswalks and
north-south traffic does
not have stop signs.
~17 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Students can enter campus
through an entrance at
Magnesia Falls Park.

0.5 miles
from school

0.5 miles
from school

0.25 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
Use caution when
crossing; traffic on
Rutledge Way does
not have stop signs.
259
D
A
O
R
N
O
Y
N
A
C
P
E
E
D
RUTLED
G
E
W
AY

AZURITE CIRCLE
ELC IR
C
N
O
C IR
Z
E N
AL N
O
Y
N
A

C REVLI S
ELC IR
C
A
D
AV
E
N
ELC IR
C
YR
U
C
R
E
M

EUNEVA E NI ROLF
GARY A

ROYAL CANYON LANE

FRED WARING DR

BUTTONWOOD DRIVE
SILKT
R
E
E LA
N
E

MYRSINE AVENUE

MAGNESIA FALLS DRIVE
OLLI C
E
T
N
O
M
O
E
S
AP

INDIAN CAN

YON LANE

KINGS CANYON LANE

PRIMROSE DRIVE

SANTOLINA DRIVE
D
A
O
R
A
C
C
E
B
E
R

LAVENDER WAY

CORAL BELLS CIRCLE

MOSS ROSE DRIVE

VIA PALMIRA

COLUMBINEDR VI E

VELARDO DRIVE

ASTER DRIVE
0 0.05 0.1
Miles

0.5 miles
from school
Use caution when
crossing; this is a large
and busy intersection
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~5 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school

0.25 miles
from school
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

PALM DESERT HIGH
SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
LEGEND
Intersection with Traffic Signal
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
CV Link
Bus Stop
Cook St
Phyllis Jackson Ln
Fred Smith Way
260

LA SIERRA DRIVE
T
E
E
R
T
S
K
O
O
C

MERLE DRIVE
T
E
E
R
T
S
N
AI T
SI R
H
C
AVENUE

SAN SIMEON DRIVE
RIVE
P
H

YLL SI J
A
C
K
S
O
N LA
N
E

SANTA FE TRAIL
YELLO
W
SAGE
DRIV
E
YA

W IS LLY
R
A
M
A
A
N
AT
N

AL ELLA
C
KELS
E
Y
CIRCLE

LESLIE AVENUE
E

PALM LAKE

WARING COURT

FRED SMITH WAY

HIDDEN PALM
S
D
R
VI E

CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
T
E
E
R
T
S
K
O
O
C

SHERYL AVENUE

AZTEC ROAD
Palm
Desert
High
~12 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school

0.25 miles
from school
~20 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
e
n.

Use caution when
crossing; this is a large
and busy intersection.

People walking and biking
can both use CV Link.

Use caution when passing
others on the trail.
261
YA

WI INLLE
B
YA
W
Y
C
N
E
G
E
R

TUDOR LANE

BRISA DRIVE
R
ES
O
RT
E
R

BOULEVARD
ARROWH
E
A
D
D
RIV
E

TESORI COU
ROMAN
Z
A LANE
S
T
MIC
H
A
EL PLA
C
E

NEWCASTLE DRIVE
PALA
C
E
DRIVE

TAMARISK ROW
DRIVE
IN
V

ERNESS WAY

AZZURO DRIVE

DEER HAVEN CIRCLE

DESERT HOLLY DRIVE

BALTUSROL C

BOX CANYON TRAIL
E IV
R
D
B
ULC IS
S
A
O
0 0.05 0.1
Miles
Use caution when
crossing; this is a wid
and busy intersectio

0.25 m
from sc

0.5 miles
from school
~10 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

RONALD REAGAN

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Suggested Routes to
School Map
0 0.05 0.1 MILE
Suggested Walk to School Route
Crosswalk
Intersection with Stop Sign
LEGEND
Intersection with Traffic Signal
This map is intended for informational purposes only. The City of Palm Desert and the Desert Sands Unified School DIstrict do not guarantee the safety of these routes or persons utilizing them, and assumes no responsibility or liability therefore.
engagepalmdesert.com/vision-zero
Country Club Dr
Liberty DrLiberty
Dr
262
E
N
AL D
O
O
W
T
S
A
E

BARINGTON DRIVE
E
C
ALP
R
EFA
H
C
S

LA COSTA
CIR
CLE

CALYPSO ROAD
D
URT
MERA
N
O
W
AY

CHANDLER WAY

TRAVISO DRIVE

OLYMPIC WAY

COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE

MALONE CIRCLE

BARONS CIRCLE

MARLOWE COURT

JUSTIN COURT

WESTBROOK COURT

CARINDA COURT

BURRUS COURT

ALCOT CIRCLE
E IV
R
D
E
N
YA
C IS
B

LIBERTY DRIVE

SUNNYBROOK DRIVE
AMATIS
TA
WAY
E
N
AL IS
R
R
A
H

ENFIELD LANE
BAY
HIL
L
WAY
CIRCLE

VARNER ROAD

WILDCAT DRIVE

LEOPARD STREET

PRESTON TRAIL
Ronald
Reagan
Elementary
Freedom Park

de
n.
miles
chool
~15 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE

0.5 miles
from school
Use caution when
walking on Country Club
Dr; this is a busy street
with lots of traffic. ~8 minutes

WA L K I N G T I M E

FROM HERE
263
Sample
Student Tally
Survey
H.
264
265
266
267
Sample
Parent/
Caregiver
Survey
I.
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302

SAFE ROUTES

FOR OLDER ADULTS
303

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
City of Palm Desert
» Chris Gerry
Public Works, Senior Project Manager
» Thomas Soule
Economic Development, Public Affairs
Manager
Project Consultants
» Sam Corbett
Principal-in-Charge, Alta Planning + Design
» Les Brown
Palm Desert SRFOA Project Manager,
Alta Planning + Design
» Kaitlin Scott
Palm Desert SRFOA Lead,
Alta Planning + Design
» Kelly Lei
Planner, Alta Planning + Design
» Eric Purcell
Planner, Alta Planning + Design
» Joseph Abad
Senior Graphic Designer,
Alta Planning + Design
Advisory Committee
» Brenda Nutcher
Desert Recreation District
» Dina Purvis
City of Indian Wells
» Don Olson
Riverside County Sheriff’s Office
» Dr. Jay Seller
The Joslyn Center
» Jessica Gonzalez
City of Palm Desert Finance
» Maureen Archuleta
Desert Recreation District
» Randy Bowman
Coachella Valley Association of Governments
» Steve Libring
City of La Quinta
304
The Vision for Safe Routes
for Older Adults in
Palm Desert 6
Introduction 7
Project Background and Need 8
How To Use This Plan 9
City of Palm Desert 10
Palm Desert Today 12
Plan, Policy, and Program Review 13
Existing Conditions 14
Outreach and
Engagement 44
Outreach and
Engagement Overview 45
Summary of Outreach Activities 46
Summary of Outreach Findings 48
Improving Safe Routes
for Older Adults in
Palm Desert 50
Recommendations Process 51
Bicycle facility types 52
Pedestrian facility types 54
Palm Desert Safe for Older Adults
Infrastructure Recommendations 56
Encouraging Safe Routes
for Older Adults in
Palm Desert 84
Programmatic Recommendations 85
Implementing Safe
Routes for Older
Adults in Palm Desert 92
Potential Funding Sources 93
Appendices
A. Complete Plan, Policy,
and Program Review 100
B. Complete Existing Conditions Report 110
C. Complete High-Injury Network Analysis 148
D. Complete Outreach
and Engagement Report 166
E. Complete City Wide Recommendations 176
F. SRFOA Suggested Routes Maps 188

TABLE OF CONTENTS
01 05
06 02
03 04
305

ACRONYMS
AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
CA AB 1550 California Assembly Bill 1550
CA AB 43 California Assembly Bill 43
Caltrans ATP Caltrans Active Transportation
Program
CAMUTCD California Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices
HIN High-Injury Network
KSI Killed or Seriously Injured
LPI Leading Pedestrian Interval
LTS Level of Traffic Stress
NEV Neighborhood Electric Vehicle
REAP Regional Early Action Planning
SCAG Southern California Association
of Governments
SRFOA Safe Routes for Older Adults
SS4A Safe Streets and Roads for All
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic
Records System
TAP SunLine Transit Ambassador
Program
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping
System
USDOT United States Department of
Transportation
USDOT ETC USDOT Equitable
Transportation Community
306

SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS
5 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
307
The Vision
for Safe
Routes
for Older
Adults in
Palm Desert

01. 308

INTRODUCTION
The Palm Desert Safe Routes for Older Adults (SRFOA) Plan is the result of thorough outreach, engagement, data collection, and analysis. It envisions a Palm Desert where all older adults and their families have access to safe, convenient, and healthy modes of transportation within their community. It is also a component of the City’s larger Vision Zero Strategy.

With funding from the United States Department of
Transportation (USDOT) Safe Streets and Roads
for All (SS4A) Grant Program, the City of Palm
Desert (City) and the SRFOA Plan Project Team
(Project Team) developed this SRFOA Plan through
a comprehensive review of walking and biking
conditions across the city, with a focus on three
key Older Adult Priority Areas. The Project Team
also conducted thorough public outreach and
engagement to understand older adults’ concerns
about roadway safety throughout Palm Desert.

For this SRFOA Plan, the term “older adults”
is used to describe individuals aged 55 and
above. This terminology has been selected to be
as inclusive as possible, recognizing the diverse
spectrum of needs and abilities that people
experience as they age. While traditional terms
like “senior” often apply to those in older age
brackets, not all individuals aged 55+ identify as
seniors. Therefore, we use the term “older adults”
to encompass all people 55+, so that our analysis
and recommendations address the broad range of
mobility and accessibility needs of this population.

SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 7 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
309

PROJECT BACKGROUND AND NEED
SRFOA is a program designed to enhance the safety and mobility of older adults in their communities. SRFOA typically focuses on improving pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, making transportation options more accessible, and educating older adults and the general public about safe travel practices. It aims to create environments where older adults can use active transportation to travel through town, whether for their jobs, daily errands, social activities, or health-care visits.

SRFOA is typically divided into two categories, infrastructure and non-infrastructure:

Infrastructure, also called engineering,
focuses on improving the built environment
to make active modes of travel safer,
more convenient, and comfortable for
people of all ages and abilities. This
is a key component of SRFOA, which
prioritizes infrastructure improvements that
specifically address the needs of older
adults, while also ensuring sidewalks,
paths, crossings, and streets are safer
and more accessible for everyone. These
physical improvements help to foster
environments that are conducive to the use
of active transportation for all, regardless
of age or mobility.

Non-infrastructure, also called
encouragement and education,
complements infrastructure by promoting
activities that make active modes of travel
more attractive, fun, and interesting while
teaching skills to do so safely.

SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 8 PALM DESERT
310

HOW TO USE THIS PLAN
This SRFOA Plan documents the activities, data
collection, and analyses for the City that resulted
in actionable infrastructure and non-infrastructure
recommendations. Various community members
can use the SRFOA Plan to identify the content that
is important and relevant to them. The following
are some examples:

Older adults can use the SRFOA Plan to
learn about existing pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure in their community and discover
suggested routes for walking and biking in Palm
Desert.

Community partners, such as the Joslyn Center
and public libraries, can use the SRFOA Plan to
develop programs that educate and encourage
visitors to use active methods of transportation to
travel in Palm Desert, fostering healthier lifestyles
and a stronger sense of community.

City staff can use the SRFOA Plan to identify
issues and opportunities related to existing
walking and bicycling infrastructure for older
adults. The City can also use the Plan to prioritize
potential short-term and long-term infrastructure
improvements and pursue SRFOA funding
opportunities.

SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 9 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
311
1EKRIWME7TVMRK
)GSPSKMGEP6IWIVZI
7ERXE6SWEERH7ER.EGMRXS
1SYRXEMRW2EXMSREP1SRYQIRX
7ERXE6SWE
;MPHPMJI%VIE
¥
¥
1328)6)=%:)
40%>%()0 73
,3:0)=02; 0
'33/78
+6%4):-2)78
&967)6%;%=
6)7368 )6 &0:(
'%0-*362-% (6
7,%(3;13928%-2 (6
*%-6;%=(6
+6%2 :-%
%2(6)%7 '%2=32(6
+%6= %:)
7,)4,)6(02
)0 4%7)3
436830%%:)
4%01:%00)= (6
4%01 +6))27 4/ ;=
'%0-*362-% %:)
7%2 6)13
1%6 -4 37 % (6
8)22)77))%:)
8)/-740
- 2(-%26-(+) (6
%0)77%2(63(6
1)7% :-); (6
+%8)
;%= (6
'39286= '09& (6
(-2%, 7,36) (6
%+%: ) 0 2
*6%2/7-2%86%(6
8 % : %
'
02 32).3'6-
1-',-+%2 (6
&)0%-66(
/-:%(6
,%=78%'/6(
,3:0)=02)
1)8%8)40
8%1%6-7/ 63; (6
+)6%0( *36( (6
7,%(3; 6- (+) 6(
7;))8;%8)6
( 6
'%00-%2(6%78
)0(36%(3(6
3%7-7'09&(6
'%78)00%2% 7
1)7% + 6 %2() ( 6
;-003; 6-(+)
City of Palm Desert
'-8=3*4%01()7)68

SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX6ITPMGE,SQIPERH-RJVEWXVYGXYVI*SYRHEXMSR0IZIP(EXE ,-*0(
7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH

()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7
8VERWMX7XSTW
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
   2.1*8
Figure 1: City of Palm Desert
SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 10 PALM DESERT
312
1 Total percentage exceeds 100% as these categories
are not mutually exclusive (i.e., some individuals may identify with more than one group).

Figure 2: Palm Desert Demographics
White
Hispanic or Latino
Asian
African American
Native American and Alaskan Native
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
Other

70.8%
24%

4.3%

2.9%

0.7% 0.3%

7.6%

CITY OF

PALM DESERT
Palm Desert is located in the heart of the
Coachella Valley in Riverside County,
California. With year-round sunshine, a
growing network of sidewalks and bicycle
facilities, and the City’s increased efforts
to expand active transportation facilities,
Palm Desert is equipped to become a
city where walking and bicycling as daily
modes of transportation for older adults is
comfortable, safe, and accessible. Figure 1
presents the City, including boundaries and
destinations such as transit stops and parks.

Palm Desert has a population of about
53,000 permanent residents and 32,000
seasonal residents. The median household
income is $64,295, and 12.9% of the
population lives below the federal poverty
line (source: Census, 2022). Palm Desert’s
residents are 4.3% Asian, 24.0% Hispanic
or Latino, 70.8% White, 2.9% African
American, 0.7% Native American and
Alaska Native, 0.3% Native Hawaiian
and Pacific Islander, and 7.6% Other.1
The
median age is 55. Figure 2 shows the
different demographics of the population in
Palm Desert.

Information specific to older adult
demographics is detailed in Chapter 2.

SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 11 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
313
Palm Desert
Today

02. 314

PLAN, POLICY, AND

PROGRAM REVIEW
This project builds on numerous local and regional plans, policies, and standards that impact active transportation in Palm Desert. These planning documents and studies were reviewed to gain a better understanding of existing conditions, as well as proposed and planned facilities for biking and walking.

Reviewed plans, policies, and programs include:

Connect SoCal
(SCAG, 2024)
Palm Desert Local Road Safety Plan
(City of Palm Desert, 2021)
California Master Plan for Aging
(State of California, 2020)
Palm Desert General Plan
(City of Palm Desert, 2016)
Envision Palm Desert Strategic Plan
(City of Palm Desert, 2014)
Safe Routes for Older Adults Guide
(UC Berkeley SafeTREC, 2018)
An in-depth review of these documents is included in Appendix A.

E
The Southern California Association
of Governments’ 2024–2050
Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy
A Plan for Navigating
to a Brighter Future
ADOPTED, APRIL 4, 2024
Connect
SoCalTM
GENERAL PLAN Adopted November 10, 2016
Master Plan
JANUARY 2021

FOR AGING
Connect SoCal (SCAG, 2024)
Palm Desert General Plan
(City of Palm Desert, 2016)
California Master Plan for
Aging (State of California,
2020)
SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 13 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
315

EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section provides an overview of existing conditions in Palm Desert. The complete Existing Conditions Report is included in Appendix B.

Older Adult Demographics in Palm Desert
In 2022, Palm Desert had an estimated permanent population of about 53,000, with 53% women and 47% men. The city also had an estimated seasonal resident population of 32,000. Palm Desert has a significantly older population (median age of 55) than Riverside County (median age of 37) and California (median age of 38). The percentage of the population aged 55+ (50%) is approximately double that of Riverside County (26%) and the state of California (27%). Figure 3 provides a breakdown of populations by age and sex.

Figure 3: Age and Sex
0 10 20 30
Over 85
Age Group
65-84
55-64
35-54
20-34
5-19
Under 5
 Men  Women
4% 5%
24% 28%
14% 13%
22%
18%
15%
21%
15%
14%
3% 4%
SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 14 PALM DESERT
316
SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 15 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
317
Most older adult residents in Palm Desert identify
as white (86%, including Hispanic or Latino white).

Older adult residents who identify as Asian make
up 3% of Palm Desert’s population, and Black/
African American older adult residents account
for 2%. Older adult residents of Hispanic/Latino
descent of any race account for 9%. Complete
racial composition data for older adults is
presented in Figure 4.

The City, through the Palm Desert Housing
Authority, manages seven affordable housing
properties offering 381 housing units for older
adults: Carlos Ortega Villas, Catalina Gardens,
La Rocca Villas, The Pueblos, Las Serenas
Apartments, Sagecrest Senior Apartments, and
Candlewood Apartments. Figure 5 displays these
as “Older Adult Housing Properties.”
Three developer-subsidized senior housing
properties also offer housing for older adults:

Villas of the Green Senior Apartments, Atria
- Assisted Living, and Catalina Way Senior
Apartments. Palm Desert also has numerous
privately operated 55+ housing communities,
such as Avenida Palm Desert, Domani, and Villa
Portofino, and various nursing homes.

Overall residential concentrations of residents
aged 55+ in Palm Desert are shown in Figure 5.

Palm Desert older adult residents primarily live
in the northern part of the city, particularly to the
north of the Whitewater River. Downtown Palm
Desert also has a high concentration of older adult
residents, specifically from south of Highway 111
to north of Grapevine Street.

Figure 4: Racial Composition for Older Adults Age 55+
White Alone
Black or
African American Alone
Asian Alone
American Indian and
Alaska Native Alone
Native Hawaiian and
Other Pacific Islander Alone
Some Other Race Alone
Two or More Races

86.1%

2.0%

2.8%

0.4%

0.2%

2.7%

5.7%
SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 16 PALM DESERT
318
1EKRIWME7TVMRK
)GSPSKMGEP6IWIVZI
7ERXE6SWEERH7ER.EGMRXS
1SYRXEMRW2EXMSREP1SRYQIRX
7ERXE6SWE
;MPHPMJI%VIE
¥
¥
40%>%()0 73
,3:0)=02; 0
'33/78
+6%4):-2)78
,3:0)=02)
7 ,%(3 ; 13928%-2 (6 *%-6;%=(6
+ 6%2 :-%
%2(6)%7 '%2=32(6
+%6= %:)
7,)4,)6(02
)0 4%7)3
4%01:%00)= (6
4%01 +6))27 4/ ;=
1%6 -4 37 % (6
436830%%:)
8)22)77))%:)
8)/-740
- 2(-%26-(+) (6
+%8)
;%= (6
'39286= '09& (6
(-2%, 7,36) (6 %1-6(6
%+%: ) 0 2
*6%2/7-2%86%(6
'32).3'6-
1-',-+%2 (6
&)0%-66(
/-:%(6
,%=78%'/6(
1)8%8)40
8%1%6-7/ 63; (6
+)6%0( *36((6
7,%(3; 6- (+) 6(
7;))8;%8)6
( 6
)0(36%(3(6 1)7% + 6 %2() ( 6
;-0 03; 6 -(+)
6)7-()28-%0
'32')286%8-327
'-8=3*4%01()7)68
8&+*74:9*8+4741)*7&):198
()78-2%8-327&392(%6-)7
(EXETVSZMHIHF]XLI'MX]SJ4EPQ(IWIVX6ITPMGE,SQIPERH-RJVEWXVYGXYVI*SYRHEXMSR0IZIP(EXE ,-*0(
7'%+ERH3TIR7XVIIX1ET7MXI)\TPSVIV(EXIWEZIH

3PHIV%HYPX,SYWMRK4VSTIVXMIW
8VERWMX7XSTW
'MX]&SYRHEV]
4EVOW
   2.1*8
6)7-()28-%0 '32')286%8-327
%FSZIMRHMZMHYEPW


&IPS[MRHMZMHYEPW
Figure 5: Residential Concentrations (Ages 55+)
SAFE ROUTES FOR OLDER ADULTS 17 VISION ZERO STRATEGY
319
Older Adult Priority Areas
In consultation with City staff, the Project Team
identified three Older Adult Priority Areas
expected to have higher older adult foot and
bike traffic to help narrow down analyses and
recommendations. These include the Joslyn Center,
the area around Town Center Way/Fred Waring
Drive, and the area west of Washington Street/
Avenue of the States. The Joslyn Center is one
of the largest older adult community centers in
Southern California, while the other two priority
areas are commercial hubs that are also near
older adult affordable housing communities and
transportation corridors.