City of Palm Desert Staff Report
Meeting Date: August 20, 2026
Prepared By: Melanie Slater, Management Analyst
Department: Public Works
Subject: Approve Amendments to Maintenance Service Agreements for Landscape Maintenance Areas 6 and 9
Recommendation
1. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C45050 with Horizon Professional Landscape, Inc., of Coachella, CA, in the amount of $5,208, to extend the contract through June 30, 2027, and increase the annual contract amount to $173,208, subject to CPI increases.
2. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C45060 with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., of Irwindale, CA, in the amount of $11,357.52, to extend the contract through June 30, 2027, and increase the annual contract amount to $377,728.20, subject to CPI increases.
3. Authorize the City Attorney to make necessary non-monetary changes to the amendments.
4. Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments, the remaining one-year extension including CPI increase requests and execute any other documents necessary to effectuate the actions taken herewith.
Executive Summary
On April 13, 2023, the City Council approved three-year Maintenance Services Agreements with Horizon Professional Landscape, Inc. (Horizon) for Landscape Maintenance Area 6 (LMA 6) and with Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. (Mariposa) for Landscape Maintenance Area 9 (LMA 9). Each agreement included two optional one-year extensions.
On September 25, 2025, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to increase the annual contract amounts to $168,000 for LMA 6 and $366,370.32 for LMA 9. Both agreements expired June 30, 2026.
Therefore, staff requests approval to extend the contracts for one year beginning July 1, 2026.
In addition, the contractors have requested annual CPI adjustments in accordance with the terms of their agreements. Staff requests City Council approval of amendments to the Landscape Maintenance Area service agreements to incorporate the requested CPI adjustments, retroactive to July 1, 2026. Staff also recommends amending the agreements to authorize the City Manager to approve future annual CPI adjustments as provided for in the contracts, eliminating the need for future City Council action on routine CPI increases. 335
Background
The City of Palm Desert (City) contracts with private landscape maintenance contractors to provide routine maintenance services for its Landscape Maintenance Areas (LMAs), including landscape medians, parkways, right-of-way, and other public landscaped areas. Many of these agreements include provisions for annual compensation adjustments based on the Urban Consumers Price Index (CPI-U) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Region (All Items) rate for the 12-month period ending March 2026, published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The CPI-U ending March 2026 is 3.1%
Contract No. C45050 – Horizon Professional Landscape (LMA 6):
LMA 6 encompasses several landscaped areas throughout and surrounding the Desert Willow Golf Resort. This includes the roundabout planters and medians located along Desert Willow Golf Resort, as well as the landscaped overflow parking lot near the intersection of Country Club Drive and Desert Willow Drive. It also includes native plantings along internal parkways and roadways, as well as landscaped perimeter areas.
On April 13, 2023, Contract No. C45050 for LMA 6 was awarded to Horizon Professional Landscape in the annual amount of $127,776. The contract which expired June 30, 2026, allows for two one-year extensions.
A summary of the adjustments to the LMA 6 contract is provided on the table below:
Item Monthly Cost Annual Cost
Yr 1 - Original Contract $10,648 $127,776
Change Order No. 1 (New Area) $2,640 $31,680
Change Order No. 1 (CPI Adjustment) $320 $3,840
Amendment No. 1 (CPI 2.9%) $392 $4,704
Yr 2 - Revised Contract Amount $14,000 $168,000
Yr 3 – Amendment 2 (CPI 3.1%) $434 $5,208
Proposed Revised Contract Amount $14,434 $173,208
Contract No. C45060 – Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. (LMA 9):
LMA 9 includes several landscaped areas: the medians along El Paseo, Baja Park and Entrada del Paseo, the streetscape improvements along San Pablo Avenue (Phases 1 and 2), Alessandro Alley, and the grounds of the Portola Community Center and the Palm Desert Historical Society.
Contract No. C45060 in the annual amount of $357,434.40 for LMA 9 was also awarded to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. on April 13, 2023. The contract expired on June 30, 2026, and allows for two one-year extensions.
A summary of the adjustments to the LMA 9 contract is provided on the table below:
Item Monthly Cost Annual Cost
Yr 1 & 2 - Original Contract $29,786.20 $357,434.40
Amendment No. 1 – CPI (2.5%) $744.66 $8,935.92
Yr 2 Revised Contract Amount $30,530.86 $366,370.32
336
Amendment No. 2 – CPI (3.1%) $946.46 $11,357.52
Proposed Revised Contract Amount $31,477.35 $377,728.20 Both agreements included an option of two one-year extensions, but do not authorize the City Manager to administratively approve annual CPI adjustments.
Analysis
Staff reviewed each contractor's CPI adjustment request and determined the requested increases are consistent with the adjustment provisions contained in the respective agreements. Because the agreements do not establish a standardized submission schedule, contractors submitted requests at different times using the most recently published Riverside County All-Items Consumer Price Index, resulting in varying adjustment percentages.
To improve consistency and administrative efficiency, staff recommends amending the agreements to authorize the City Manager to approve future annual CPI adjustments in accordance with the contract provisions. This process will provide a consistent basis for future adjustments while eliminating the need for routine City Council action.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act because it is an administrative, organizational, procedural, fiscal, or informational activity that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.
Legal Review
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.
Financial Impact
Sufficient funding is included in the approved FY 2026-27 Financial Plan in the various Public Works Department operations budgets to cover the requested adjustments; therefore, there is no additional financial impact to the General Fund with this action.
The table below outlines the budgets and adjusted contract amount for each area:
Accounts / Description FY 2026/27 Budget Adjusted Contract Amount
Balance
Available
1104614-4337001 $325,000
1104614-4392101 $100,000
4414195-4332000 $160,000
C45050 LMA 6 - Horizon $173,208
C45060 LMA 9 - Mariposa $377,729
Total $585,000 $551,303 $33,697
Future year extensions and CPI requests will be contingent upon approval of the associated Annual Budget.
337
Attachments
1. C45050 Am 2 Horizon Professional Landscape - LMA 6
2. C45060 Am 2 Mariposa Landscapes - LMA 9
3. LMA 6 Renewal Letter
4. LMA 9 Renewal Letter
5. LMA 6 Map
6. LMA 9 Map
338
Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist
Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations.
1. Site-Specific Property Interest
Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the project site: Please see the attached district boundaries map.
Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2).
2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract?
☐ Yes
☒ No
If yes, identify the applicant(s), appellant(s), party, or participant(s):
Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 339
340
Contract No. C45050
1 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
AND HORIZON PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE, INC.
1. Parties and Date.
This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”) to the Maintenance Services Agreement, Contract No. C45050, is made and entered into on August 20, 2026, by and between the City of Palm Desert, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, 92260-2578 (“City”) and Horizon Professional Landscape, Inc., a Corporation, with its principal place of business at 48727 Charlton Peak, Coachella, CA 92236 (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
2. Recitals.
2.1 Agreement. The City and Horizon Professional Landscape, Inc. entered into a Maintenance Services Agreement (“Agreement”) on April 13, 2023, for the purpose of retaining the services of Horizon Professional Landscape, Inc. for Landscape Maintenance Area No. 6 (“Project”).
2.2 Background. The parties previously entered into a previous amendment, on September 25, 2025.
2.3 Amendment Authority. This Amendment is authorized pursuant to Section 3.5.9 of the Maintenance Services Agreement.
2.4 The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to increase compensation and extend term.
3. Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
Section 3.1.2 Term. The term of this agreement shall be from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027, unless earlier terminated as
provided herein. The City shall have the unilateral
option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement automatically for no more than one additional one-year
term. Contractor shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other
established schedules and deadlines. The Parties may,
by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this
Agreement if necessary to complete the Services.
Section 3.3.1 Compensation. Contractor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services
rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in 341
Contract No. C45050
2 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
Exhibit “C-1” attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed
One Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand Two
Hundred and Eight and 00/100 Dollars ($173,208.00)
per fiscal year and may only be adjusted for Consumer
Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Region (All
Items) rate for the 12-month period ending June 2027,
upon request, with written approval from the City
Council or City Manager following FY 2026-27, as
applicable .
3.1 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 2. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 2, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2.
3.2 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 2.
3.3 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 2 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
342
Contract No. C45050
3 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
AND HORIZON PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE, INC.
CITY OF PALM DESERT
Chris Escobedo
City Manager
Attest:
Anthony J. Mejia
City Clerk
Approved to form by:
____________________________
Isra Shah
City Attorney
HORIZON PROFESSIONAL
LANDSCAPE, INC., A CORPORATION
Ninfa J Mendoza
Vice President
____________________________
Rafael Mendoza
Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial
Officer
Office Use:
Quality Check Insurance Review
City Clerk Contracts Initial Final
343
Contract No. C45050
4 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
EXHIBIT “C-1”
COMPENSATION
Site Name Monthly Cost Yearly Cost
LMA 6 $14,434.00 $173,208.00
344
Contract No. C45060
1 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
AND MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC.
1. Parties and Date.
This Amendment No. 2 (“Amendment”) to the Maintenance Services Agreement, Contract No. C45060, is made and entered into on August 20, 2026, by and between the City of Palm Desert, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 73-510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California, 92260-2578 (“City”) and Mariposa Landscapes, Inc., an S Corporation, with its principal place of business at 6236 Santos Diaz St., Irwindale, CA 91702 (“Contractor”).
City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”
2. Recitals.
2.1 Agreement. The City and Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. entered into a Maintenance Services Agreeement (“Agreement”) on April 24, 2025, for the purpose of retaining the services of Mariposa Landscapes, Inc for Landscape Maintenance Area No. 9 (“Project”).
2.2 Amendment Authority. This Amendment is authorized pursuant to Section
3.5.9 of the Agreement.
2.3 The purpose of this Amendment No. 2 is to extend the term and adjust compensation for CPI increase.
3. Terms. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
Section 3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027, unless earlier terminated as
provided herein. The City shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement
automatically for no more than one additional one year
term. Contractor shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement and shall meet any other
established schedules and deadlines. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this
Agreement if necessary to complete the Services.
Section 3.3.1 Compensation. Contractor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services
rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C-1” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total annual compensation shall not
345
Contract No. C45060
2 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
exceed Three Hundred Seventy-Seven Thousand
Seven Hundred and Twenty-Eight Dollars and 20/100
($377,728.20) for monthly landscape services per fiscal year and may only be adjusted for Consumer Price Index
for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the Riverside-San
Bernardino-Ontario, CA Region (All Items) rate for the 12- month period ending June 2027, upon request, with
written approval from the City Council or City Manager
following FY 2026-27, as applicable . The City may
request additional work at the same rates and manner as set forth in this Agreement on an as needed basis as
specified in Section 3.3.5. Contractor shall not perform Extra Work, presume Extra Work will be guaranteed,
nor be compensated for Extra Work without written
authorization from the City. Work performed as Extra
Work shall not exceed the amount of Eighty-Five
Thousand Dollars ($85,000.00). Contractor shall not be
reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized by the
City Council or City Manager, as
applicable.
3.1 Continuing Effect of Agreement. Except as amended by this Amendment No. 2, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and shall govern the actions of the Parties under this Amendment No. 2. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 2, whenever the term “Agreement” appears in the Agreement, it shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 2.
3.2 Adequate Consideration. The Parties hereto irrevocably stipulate and agree that they have each received adequate and independent consideration for the performance of the obligations they have undertaken pursuant to this Amendment No. 2.
3.3 Severability. If any portion of this Amendment No. 2 is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
346
Contract No. C45060
3 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
SIGNATURE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT AND MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC.
CITY OF PALM DESERT
Chris Escobedo
City Manager
Attest:
Anthony J. Mejia
City Clerk
Approved to form by:
____________________________
Isra Shah
City Attorney
MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES, INC., AN S
CORPORATION
Terry Noriega
President
____________________________
Antonio Valenzuela
Secretary
Office Use:
Quality Check Insurance Review
City Clerk Contracts Initial Final
347
Contract No. C45060
4 Rev 04-26
72500.00001\44340560.1
EXHIBIT “C-1”
COMPENSATION
Site Name Monthly Cost Yearly Cost
LMA 9 $31,477.35 $377,728.20
348
349
350
City of Palm Desert
LMA -9
Contract No. C45060
Extension Request FY-2026-2027
Incurred Increases Analysis
Items: 2025 2026 Increase $ % Increased
Prevailing Wage $ 16.86 $ 17.26 $ 0.40 2%
Fuel $ 4.98 $ 5.68 $ 0.70 14%
Dump Fees $ 73.00 $ 79.00 $ 6.00 8%
4.3%
Requested Increase
Site Name: Current Monthly: 3.1% New Monthly: New Yearly:
LMA 9 $ 30,530.89 $ 946.46 $ 31,477.35 $ 377,728.20
COMBINED TOTALS>>>> $ 30,530.89 $ 946.46 $ 31,477.35 $ 377,728.20 April 2024 CPI Over the Last 12 Months For San Bernardino Co, Riverside Co, and Ontario Areas 351
352
353
354
355
356
City of Palm Desert Staff Report
Meeting Date: August 20, 2026
Prepared By: Erica Jimenez, Management Analyst II
Department: Public Works
Subject: Purchase of Nine Ancestral Feathers by Adrian Litman from the 2025-26 El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition for Installation at Gerald Ford Drive median near Dinah Shore Drive
Recommendation
1. Approve the purchase of Nine Ancestral Feathers from the 2025/2026 El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition and its installation in the Gerald Ford Drive median near Dinah Shore Drive, in an amount not to exceed $15,000, for inclusion in the City of Palm Desert’s permanent public art collection.
2. Waive city permit fees related to the relocation and installation of said art piece.
3. Authorize the City Attorney to make necessary non-monetary changes to the agreement.
4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and related documentation.
Executive Summary
The Cultural Arts Committee (Committee) reviewed artwork featured in the 2025/2026 El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition and recommended purchase of Nine Ancestral Feathers by Adrian Litman for inclusion in the City’s permanent public art collection. The Committee also recommended installation within the Gerald Ford Drive median near Dinah Shore Drive.
Funding for the artwork purchase, installation, and related incidental costs is available within the FY 2026/2027 Public Art budget.
Background
The El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition is an annual outdoor exhibition featuring temporary sculpture installations throughout Palm Desert. At the conclusion of each exhibition cycle, the City may consider select artworks for inclusion in the permanent public art collection.
As part of the exhibition review process, the Committee evaluated eligible sculptures and potential installation sites identified by staff, including the Gerald Ford Drive median west of Dinah Shore Drive / Pacific Avenue (location map attached). Following its review, the Committee recommended Nine Ancestral Feathers for acquisition, citing its strong connection to the Coachella Valley and its thoughtful conceptualization by the artist.
Nine Ancestral Feathers is a stainless-steel sculpture honoring the nine federally recognized Native Tribal nations in the region: Agua Caliente, Augustine, Cahuilla, Cabazon, Los Coyotes, Morongo, Ramona, Santa Rosa, and Torres Martinez. Inspired by the eagle feather as a 357
symbol of honor, wisdom, strength, and freedom, the sculpture celebrates the enduring cultural heritage and presence of the region’s Native communities. Dimensions: 14’ x 8’ x 8’.
Analysis
The proposed acquisition of Nine Ancestral Feathers supports the City’s ongoing investment in public art and cultural enrichment.
The Gerald Ford Drive median west of the Dinah Shore Drive / Pacific Avenue intersection provides a highly visible location that will enhance the surrounding corridor and contribute to the City’s public realm. Staff have reviewed the proposed location and determined it is appropriate for permanent installation.
Upon City Council approval, staff will coordinate pad fabrication, transportation, installation, and related site improvements necessary for permanent placement of the artwork. The artwork is expected to require minimal routine maintenance and will be incorporated into the City's existing public art maintenance program. Permanent City-owned sculptures are cleaned twice annually. As a painted metal sculpture, Nine Ancestral Feathers is anticipated to require restoration of its painted finish approximately every 10 to 15 years, depending on weathering and environmental conditions.
The sculpture will remain on display as part of the 2025/2026 El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition through October 2026 before being relocated to its permanent installation site, with installation tentatively scheduled for November 2026.
Appointed Body Recommendation
At its May 13, 2026, meeting, the Committee recommended purchase of Nine Ancestral Feathers from the 2025/2026 El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition and installation within the Gerald Ford Drive median near Dinah Shore Drive.
Environmental Review
The proposed actions are categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) and 15303 (Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), as the project consists of installation of public art within an existing roadway median with negligible expansion of use.
None of the exceptions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. Additionally, the project is exempt under the commonsense exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as there is no possibility the activity will have a significant effect on the environment. No further environmental review is required.
Legal Review
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office. 358
Financial Impact
The purchase price for Nine Ancestral Feathers is $10,000. Additional project costs, including installation and other incidental costs, are estimated not to exceed $5,000. Lighting is not included as part of the current project, as electrical power is not presently available at the installation site. Staff will explore opportunities to provide power and incorporate lighting in the future, as appropriate. Staff requests authorization for a total amount not to exceed $15,000, inclusive of the artwork purchase, installation, incidental expenses, and any unforeseen project costs.
Funding in the amount of $150,000 is available in the approved FY 2026/2027 Budget and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) List under Miscellaneous Public Art Projects, Public Art Account No. 4364650-4400100.
Maintenance of the artwork will be incorporated into the City’s existing public art maintenance program. Therefore, there will be no additional financial impact on the General Fund.
Staff also requests waiving all applicable City permit fees associated with this project.
Attachments
1. Image of Nine Ancestral Feathers by Adrian Litman and proposed location.
2. Contract
359
Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist
Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations.
1. Site-Specific Property Interest
Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the project site: Gerald Ford Drive median near Dinah Shore Drive Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2).
2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract?
☐ Yes
☒ No
If yes, identify the party:
Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 360
Image of Nine Ancestral Feathers, Adrian Litman
And Proposed Location
361
Proposed Location: Gerald Ford Drive, near Dinah Shore Drive 362
Contract No. _________
1 AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ARTWORK
This Agreement is made and entered into on August 20, 2026, by and between the City of Palm Desert, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Adrian Litman, a Sole Proprietor located in Santa Rosa, California (“ARTIST”) who agree as follows:
RECITALS
Section 1. As part of the City’s Art in Public Places program, certain funds are available for the establishment of artworks in public places and for the purchase or commissioning of artworks and;
Section 2. History of Work. Nine Ancestral Feathers by Adrian Susnea Litman has been and will be displayed on El Paseo as part of the 2025/2026 El Paseo Sculpture Exhibition from November 2025 through October 2026. The Work was selected for purchase by CITY through review by the Cultural Arts Committee and is therefore being purchased by CITY.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree as follows:
Section 1. Price. CITY shall pay ARTIST a firm fixed price of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($10,000.00) for the sculpture described as Nine Ancestral Feathers (“Work”). It is agreed that City has no obligations regarding commissions or any agreements with galleries or agents with whom ARTIST may have contracted.
Section 2. Warranty of Originality. ARTIST warrants that the performance, design, and Work being purchased is original and the product of ARTIST’S own creative efforts and does not infringe the right of any persons. ARTIST also warrants that, unless otherwise stipulated in writing and attached hereto, the Work is original, that it is an edition of one (1), and that ARTIST shall not sell, license, perform, or reproduce a substantially identical copy of the Work without the prior consent of CITY.
Section 3. Warranty on Workmanship. ARTIST shall warrant and maintain his/her Work free from all faults or defects arising from material and workmanship for a period of one (1) year after purchase.
Section 4. Alteration of Work. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Art Preservation Act, California Civil Code section 987 et seq., CITY agrees that it will not intentionally destroy, damage, alter, modify, or change the Work in any way. If an alteration should occur, either intentionally or unintentionally, then the Work will no longer be represented as the work of the ARTIST without his/her written permission. CITY agrees to reasonably assure that the Work is properly preserved, maintained, and protected. CITY shall, however, have the right to move or relocate the Work or remove it from display without the consent of ARTIST.
Section 5. Repair. Insofar as is practical, in the event repair of the Work is required, CITY 363
Contract No. _________
2 shall give ARTIST, during his or her lifetime, the opportunity to do that work for a reasonable fee. In the case of disagreement between CITY and ARTIST as to what constitutes a reasonable fee, the fee determined by an independent conservator selected by CITY shall be considered a reasonable fee. In the event ARTIST refuses to make the repair for such fee, CITY may proceed to arrange for such repair by a person qualified to accomplish the restoration. When emergency repairs are necessary in order to prevent the loss of or further damage to the Work, such repairs shall be undertaken or arranged by CITY without advance notice to ARTIST, and such repairs shall not be deemed to constitute an artistic alteration.
Section 6. Authorship of Work. ARTIST shall retain the right to claim authorship of the Work. CITY shall assure that ARTIST’S name shall be publicly displayed on, at, or near the Work. In the event the Work is substantially damaged or artistically altered in a substantial manner, CITY shall no longer represent the Work to be the Work of ARTIST if ARTIST gives written notice to CITY that it is the position of ARTIST that ARTIST has the right to deny authorship on the grounds stated in this paragraph. In the event CITY disputes the right of ARTIST to deny authorship, the matter shall be submitted to the Arbitration Service of California Lawyers for the Arts which shall determine the issue of whether the Work is substantially damaged or artistically altered in a substantial manner.
Such determination shall be binding upon CITY and ARTIST and neither shall have any further recourse or cause of action regarding the matters so determined.
Section 7. Indemnification. ARTIST shall assume the defense of, and indemnify and save harmless, the City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, and expenses of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected, by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the performance of this Agreement by ARTIST, whether within or without the scope of this Agreement, whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. The foregoing shall include, but not be limited to, any attorney fees reasonably incurred by CITY. The obligation to defend and indemnify the CITY shall terminate upon the completion of the one-year warranty period.
Section 8. Copyright. Upon purchase of ARTIST’S Work, copyright of the Work will be owned jointly by CITY and ARTIST and no further use of the copyright will be made by ARTIST or CITY without the written consent of the other, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld.
CITY has the right to reproduce and distribute in printed form and on commercial documents and/or brochures or any other literature of CITY describing or dealing with its real estate holdings, photographs, realistic renderings, videotapes, or films of the Work.
Such reproductions and use of the images of the Work for promotional purposes shall not constitute a breach of copyright and no royalty shall be due and payable by CITY to ARTIST for such use.
Section 9. Credit to the Artist. Such reproduction and images of the Work which feature the Work as art for publicity, promotion, and educational purposes shall, to the extent 364
Contract No. _________
3 reasonably possible and appropriate, give reference to the artist. Reproduction and images of Work in which the purpose of the reproduction or image is predominantly unrelated to the Work shall not require reference to artist.
Section 10. Artist Reproduction Rights. Pursuant to Section 8, CITY agrees that ARTIST shall have the right to reproduce and distribute in printed form and on non-commercial educational materials and brochures advertising or promoting ARTIST and ARTIST’S career, two-dimensional images such as photos, slides, or realistic renderings, video tapes, or films of the Work as installed. Such reproductions and use of the images of the Work for promotional and educational purposes shall be deemed to not constitute a breach of copyright in any way and no royalty fee shall be due and payable to ARTIST for such use. Such reproduction and images of the Work for publicity, promotion, and educational purposes shall, to the extent reasonably possible and appropriate, give reference to City of Palm Desert.
Section 11. Records. CITY agrees to maintain for a reasonable period of time a record of this Agreement and of the location and disposition of the Work.
Section 12. Breach of Agreement; Arbitration.
a) In the event ARTIST or CITY believes that the other has failed to faithfully perform this Agreement, the aggrieved party shall notify the other in writing of such failure. Such notice shall specify in detail each and every failure and the reason such failure is a breach of the Agreement. In the event that the parties cannot resolve the dispute, the Arbitration Service of the California Lawyers for the Arts shall determine whether or not there has been a failure to perform this Agreement and such determination shall be final and binding upon both ARTIST and CITY.
b) If any matter is to be submitted to a third party for resolution, all fees, expenses, and costs connected therewith shall be borne jointly and equally by CITY and ARTIST. Each and every obligation under this Agreement to submit any matter to a third party for resolution is conditioned upon the foregoing provision of this paragraph. If any matter is to be submitted to the Arbitration Service of the California Lawyers for the Arts for resolution pursuant to the Agreement, and if, at the time such submission is called for, the Arbitration Service of the California Lawyers for the Arts is not in existence or is not able or willing to provide such resolution service, then the matter shall be submitted for resolution to the American Arbitration Association in accordance with their procedures then in use.
Section 13. Artist's Rights; Notification of Change of Address. ARTIST shall notify the CITY of any change of address and failure to do so shall constitute a waiver of ARTIST’S rights pursuant to this Agreement during the time such omission prevails. Any waiver of a right pursuant to this Agreement for failure to maintain ARTIST’S current address so aforesaid may be cured prospectively only by notifying the CITY of ARTIST’S current address. All rights of ARTIST pursuant to this Agreement shall be personal to ARTIST and shall terminate upon either the legal disability or incompetence of ARTIST or upon the death of ARTIST, except as provided ARTIST under the Copyright Laws. No right of ARTIST pursuant to this Agreement may be assigned or transferred in any manner, 365
Contract No. _________
4 including without limiting the generality of the foregoing any hypothecation or pledge or any grant of any security interest, except as provided by ARTIST under the Copyright laws.
Section 14. Notice. All notices shall be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, by certified mail, addressed as follows:
City: City of Palm Desert
Erica Jimenez, Public Art Management
Analyst 73-510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
(760) 346-0611
Artist: Adrian Litman
4284 Deer Trail Road
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
(510) 386-7859
Section 15. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement is the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements whether written or oral.
This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement and no purported oral amendment to this Agreement shall be valid.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
366
Contract No. _________
5 SIGNATURE PAGE TO AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE ARTWORK
BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT
AND ADRIAN LITMAN ART & DESIGN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF PALM DESERT
_____________________________________
Chris Escobedo
City Manager
Attest:
___________________________________
Anthony J. Mejia
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Isra Shah
City Attorney
ADRIAN LITMAN, A SOLE PROPRIETOR
_____________________________________
Adrian Litman
Artist
Office Use:
Quality Check
City Clerk Contracts
367
368
City of Palm Desert Staff Report
Meeting Date: August 20, 2026
Prepared By: Veronica Chavez, Deputy City Manager
Department: City Manager’s Office
Subject: Update on Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 General Fund Revenue and Consideration of a 10-Year Repayment Strategy for the City's CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability and Ratify the FY 2026-27 Additional Discretionary Payment of Up to $1.2 Million Recommendation
1. Receive updated FY 2025-26 General Fund Revenue Projections.
2. Consider commitment to a 10-year repayment strategy for the City's CalPERS UAL, beginning FY 2026-27.
3. Ratify authorization making the FY 2026-27 CalPERS Additional Discretionary Payment (ADP) from remaining unallocated General Fund balance available at the close of FY 2025-26, in the amount of $1,206,372 and complete the required notification with CalPERS.
4. Appropriate $1,206,372 from Unobligated General Fund Balance to General Services Retirement Contributions Account No. 1104159-4101500.
5. Direct staff to include future-year ADP funding options in the annual budget process, using anticipated revenue growth from Measure G Sales Tax, or other General Fund resources as available.
Executive Summary
FY 2025-26 Annual Budget estimated $109 million in General Fund Revenue. With most revenue now accounted for the General Fund is anticipated to hit $120 million in total revenue, a portion of which is related to one-time monies. In consideration of this growth and projected long-term revenue needs, staff recommends using these additional funds strategically by accelerating repayment of the CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) and allocating the rest to General Fund Balance. This report will address the UAL repayment directly.
Accelerated repayment of the City’s UAL using a 10-year repayment strategy requires higher annual payments in the near term, but it would pay down the City's pension funding gap faster, reduce long-term interest costs, strengthen the City's funded position, and free future General Fund capacity for service delivery and other community priorities in alignment with future needs.
The City's FY 2026-27 CalPERS UAL balance is approximately $46.6 million, with a funded ratio of 73.2%. Under the current 20-year repayment schedule, the City is projected to make required UAL payments through FY 2043-44. A 10-year strategy would require estimated 369
annual payments of approximately $6.1 million through FY 2035-36 and is projected to save approximately $9.9 million in long-term interest costs compared with the current schedule.
Accelerating the UAL repayment requires an estimated Additional Discretionary Payment (ADP) of $1.2 million in FY 2026-27. Staff recommends funding this ADP from available remaining budgets from the General Fund Balance at the close of FY 2025-26. Future-year ADPs may be budgeted from anticipated 1% District Tax revenue growth as part of the fiscal sustainability component of the Five-Year Measure G Plan or from other available General Fund resources.
Background
FY 2025-26 revenue estimates indicated stagnant growth over the fiscal year. While this assumption was generally true, there were a few unanticipated anomalies. Below are the major changes contributing to the increase:
Description Increased Amount Total Estimate
Original Estimated Revenue $109,959,422
Measure G Sales Tax $3,9,37,788
Transient Occupancy
Tax/STR
$1,951,519
Other Revenue $61,294
Storm Hilary Cost Recovery* $3,072,411
Plan Check Fees* $814,679
Grants* $758,803
Total Estimated Increase $10,596,494
Final Estimated Revenue $120,555,916
*One time revenue
With multiple sources vying for current reserved funds, staff recommends proactively and strategically using these unanticipated funds in light of projected resource needs illustrated in the 10-Year Cash Projections.
Accelerated Repayment of CalPERS UAL
CalPERS, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, administers retirement benefits for many California public employees, including employees of local government agencies. Through its contract with CalPERS, the City contributes toward pension benefits for eligible employees. CalPERS invests employer and employee contributions and pays retirement benefits to eligible retirees.
The City's UAL represents the difference between pension benefits already earned by employees and retirees and the assets currently available in the City's CalPERS plan to pay those benefits. In practical terms, it is the City's pension funding gap. Because the UAL accrues interest over time, the pace at which the City repays the UAL directly affects the total cost to taxpayers.
FY 2026-27 CalPERS Accruals Amount
Present Value of City's Accrued Liability $173.8M
Market Value of Assets $127.2M
Unfunded Accrued Liability $46.6M
370
Funded Ratio 73.2%
The UAL changes over time based on investment returns, actuarial assumptions, payroll, retirements, benefit changes, and other experience that differs from prior projections. CalPERS recalculates the City's pension position annually and establishes required payments designed to amortize the UAL over time.
CalPERS has shortened UAL amortization periods in recent years. In 2013, CalPERS moved to a fixed 30-year amortization approach. In 2019, CalPERS shortened repayment periods to 20 years. CalPERS also provides alternative amortization scenarios, such as 15-year and 10- year schedules, to help agencies evaluate how accelerated payments can reduce long-term costs.
Analysis
The current 20-year repayment approach reduces annual budget pressure in the near term, but it extends the City's pension liability for a longer period and increases total interest costs.
By contrast, a 10-year repayment strategy requires additional annual contributions now but reduces principal faster and materially lowers the City's total long-term cost.
For FY 2026-27, CalPERS estimates the City's required UAL payment at approximately $4.9 million. A 10-year approach is estimated at approximately $6.1 million annually, requiring an additional payment of approximately $1.2 million for that year. Over the full 10-year period, the City would make approximately $14.2 million in additional discretionary payments compared with the current schedule. Those payments are projected to eliminate the UAL earlier and avoid approximately $9.9 million in interest costs that would otherwise be paid under the longer amortization schedule.
The strategy for accelerating repayment is straightforward: the City can use available resources today to reduce an existing obligation, lower total taxpayer cost, and improve future budget flexibility. The estimated $9.9 million in avoided interest is not a new revenue source, but it represents future dollars that would no longer need to be spent on pension interest and could instead support core services, infrastructure, reserves, public safety, parks, community programs, or other City Council priorities.
Accelerated repayment also sends a strong fiscal management message. It demonstrates that the City is not only meeting its pension obligations but actively managing them to reduce longterm liabilities and intergenerational cost shifting. This approach is consistent with prudent long-range financial planning and supports the City's overall fiscal sustainability objectives.
The recommended 10-year CalPERS UAL repayment strategy is a fiscally responsible opportunity to reduce a known long-term liability, save approximately $9.9 million in interest, and improve the City's future budget flexibility. Although the strategy requires additional payments in the near term, it positions the City to retire pension debt sooner and redirect future resources from interest costs to community priorities.
The primary tradeoff is near-term budget capacity. Accelerated repayment increases annual pension contributions during the 10-year period, so staff recommends limiting the FY 2026-27 ADP to available year-end balances and evaluating future ADPs through the annual budget process. Future CalPERS actuarial results, investment returns, payroll changes, and other 371
experience may affect the UAL balance and required contributions. Staff will continue to monitor CalPERS projections and update the City Council as part of the long-range financial planning process.
The election to make the initial ADP payment for FY 2026-27 is being requested as a ratification due to the July 31st deadline to notify CalPERS that we intend to make the payment as it fell during the City Council summer break. Making this commitment now, while subjecting future-year ADP payments to annual budget approval, will allow the City Council to evaluate each payment based on current circumstances without being constrained by future summer recess schedules.
Environmental Review
The requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) do not apply to the proposed action because, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c), the action will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378. Here, the proposed action concerns the repayment of an existing pension liability and will not authorize or commit the City to any any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Therefore, the proposed action is not subject to CEQA.
Legal Review
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.
Financial Impact
Approval of the recommended strategy would increase the City's CalPERS UAL payment in FY 2026-27 by $1,206,372 above the current required payment, subject to available FY 2025-26 year-end budget balances. The 10-year plan is estimated to require annual payments of approximately $6.1 million through FY 2035-36.
The total additional discretionary payment over the first 10 years is estimated at approximately $14.2 million. In exchange, the City is projected to avoid approximately $9.9 million in longterm interest costs by paying the UAL down earlier than the current schedule.
Future-year ADPs may be incorporated into the annual budget process using anticipated 1% District Tax revenue growth as a component of the fiscal sustainability requirement in the FiveYear Measure G Plan, or other available General Fund resources. Because CalPERS requires prepayment and notification of ADPs by July 31 each year, staff will return through the annual budget process in future years and keep Council informed if future funding assumptions change.
Payment Date 20-Year Payment
Plan
10-Year
Payment Plan
Recommended
ADP/Savings
6/30/2026 $4,913,511 $6,119,883 $1,206,372
6/30/2027 $5,076,101 $6,119,883 $1,043,782
6/30/2028 $5,117,848 $6,119,883 $1,002,035
6/30/2029 $5,162,359 $6,119,883 $957,524
6/30/2030 $5,187,881 $6,119,883 $932,002
372
6/30/2031 $4,686,697 $6,119,884 $1,433,186
6/30/2032 $4,614,048 $6,119,883 $1,505,835
6/30/2033 $4,244,597 $6,119,883 $1,875,286
6/30/2034 $4,086,784 $6,119,884 $2,033,099
6/30/2035 $3,917,870 $6,119,884 $2,202,013
Total Payments $47,007,696 $61,198,830 $14,191,134
Remaining Payments through 6/30/2043 $24,075,386 $0 $24,075,386 Total Payments/Estimated Savings $71,083,082 $61,198,833 $9,884,249 Total Interest Paid/Estimated Savings $26,248,583 $16,364,334 $9,884,249 The remaining excess funds, estimated at $9.3 million, would remain as undesignated General Fund Balance and available for future reserves, operations, or capital needs.
Total Estimated Increase to GF Revenue $10,596,494
FY 2026/27 CalPERS UAL ADP ($1,206,372)
Additional GF Fund Balance $9,390,322
FY 2026-27 Reserve Impact Summary Amount
Estimated Beginning Fund Balance $128,187,317
Less: Required/Policy Reserve ($83,998,134)
Remaining Available Reserve $44,189,183
Less: Prior FY 2026-27 Council Appropriations $0
Less: Current Request ($1,206,372)
Est. Available Reserve After This Request $42,982,811
Attachments
1. Revenue Update and CalPERS Retirement Payment Plan Strategy Presentation will be provided prior to the meeting.
373
Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist
Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations.
1. Site-Specific Property Interest
Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☐ Yes
☒ No
If yes, identify the project site:
Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2).
2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract?
☐ Yes
☒ No
If yes, identify the applicant(s), appellant(s), party, or participant(s):
Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 374
City of Palm Desert Staff Report
Meeting Date: August 20, 2026
Prepared By: Lucero Leyva, Senior Project Manager
Department: Capital Projects
Subject: Award of a Task Order to Accenture LLP to Provide Construction Management Services for the Fire Station 33 Renovation and Fire Station 71 Demolition and Reconstruction Projects (Project Nos. CFA00017 and CFA00019) Recommendation
1. Award a task order to Accenture LLP, for Construction Management Services of Fire Station 33 and 71 in the amount not to exceed of $3,271,210.
2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve the use of the former Sheriff's Substation building as a temporary fire station during renovation of Fire Station 33 (Project No. CFA00017) and reconstruction of Fire Station 71 (Project No.
CFA00019).
3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the task order and any other documents necessary to effectuate this action.
Executive Summary
This item authorizes a task order with Accenture LLP, through its disregarded entity, Accenture and Capital Improvements LLC (collectively, “Accenture LLP”), which is the consultant’s legal contracting name, to provide construction management services for the Fire Station 33 Renovation (Project No. CFA00017) and the Fire Station 71 Demolition and Reconstruction (Project No. CFA00019). It also authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to approve the use of the former Sheriff's Substation as a temporary fire station during construction of both projects to maintain uninterrupted fire and emergency response services.
Accenture LLP is currently providing preconstruction support under a previously approved task order, including design reviews, cost estimating, and constructability analysis. As both projects transition into construction, the proposed task order expands Accenture's scope to include construction management, coordination of temporary fire operations, project delivery oversight, schedule and budget monitoring, contractor and stakeholder coordination, inspection management, and project closeout support. Approval of the task order will ensure continuity with the existing project team and provide the resources necessary to successfully complete both projects. Funding for these services is available within the approved project budgets for Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71.
Background
On January 12, 2023, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with PBK Architects, Inc., to assess the condition of Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71. The assessments identified several areas of need at both facilities, including grading, structural, and mechanical improvements that would also trigger associated accessibility upgrades to 375
comply with current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. The assessments also identified limitations with the existing station layouts in accommodating current and future fire service operations. Based on these findings, the City evaluated the costs and long-term benefits of renovating each facility compared with demolition and reconstruction. The analysis determined that renovation of Fire Station 33 was the more cost-effective approach to address the identified deficiencies and improve the station’s functionality.
For Fire Station 71, the analysis determined that demolition and reconstruction would provide greater long-term value despite an estimated cost approximately $1.3 million higher than renovation. While renovation would address certain deficiencies, it would require a substantial investment in the existing facility while retaining limitations associated with the station’s current layout and configuration. A new facility would allow the station to be designed specifically for current fire service operations while providing greater flexibility to accommodate additional personnel, apparatus, and operational needs as the City continues to grow. Reconstruction would also improve the overall functionality and use of available space and avoid investing significant resources in retrofitting an existing facility that would continue to have operational constraints. Based on these considerations, the additional investment in reconstruction was determined to provide a more functional, adaptable, and sustainable long-term solution for Fire Station 71.
The table below summarizes the estimated costs of renovating versus rebuilding each fire station, as presented to the City Council at its July 11, 2024 meeting.
Building Renovation New Build
Fire Station No. 33 5,978,157 11,727,810
Fire Station No. 71 4,953,555 6,226,460
At that meeting, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with PBK Architects, Inc., to provide architectural and engineering design services for both projects.
Since then, City staff has worked closely with PBK Architects and CAL FIRE to prepare the project plans, technical specifications, and cost estimates. The design documents are currently undergoing plan review and approval by the appropriate agencies. Once those approvals are complete, staff anticipates advertising both projects for competitive bids.
The City initially evaluated establishing two separate temporary fire stations at different locations to maintain fire and emergency response services during construction of Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71. Establishing these temporary facilities was estimated to cost approximately $2 million to $3.5 million per location, primarily for modular facilities, site improvements, temporary utilities, and other infrastructure necessary to support fire operations. Under this approach, City fire resources would also have been temporarily redistributed to available fire stations, including some located outside City limits, creating additional operational and logistical considerations.
As project planning progressed, staff identified the former Sheriff’s Substation as a viable alternative that could serve as a single temporary fire station for both projects. The location has been evaluated for its ability to maintain appropriate emergency response coverage while allowing the City to use an existing facility rather than establish two separate temporary sites.
This approach would also keep two fire engines and two paramedic units operating and responding within City limits, helping maintain emergency response coverage throughout the 376
City. This approach is expected to avoid substantial temporary facility costs and reduce the time and resources required for site preparation and utility installation. Additionally, improvements made to accommodate temporary fire operations would be permanent improvements to an existing City-owned asset, providing continued value to the City beyond the temporary use of the facility as a fire station. The current lease for the former Sheriff’s Substation expires in December 2026, after which the facility will become available for City use and can be prepared to accommodate fire personnel, apparatus, and equipment.
Prior to commencing temporary fire operations, the City will notify surrounding residents of the proposed use and coordinate with the Fire Department on measures to minimize neighborhood impacts, including reducing siren noise when operationally appropriate and consistent with emergency response and public safety requirements.
To support the projects, the City previously approved a task order with Accenture LLP under the City’s on-call construction management services agreement. Accenture LLP is currently providing preconstruction services, including reviewing the plans for potential construction issues, preparing cost estimates, and providing other design-phase support. As the projects move into bidding and construction, additional construction management services are needed to coordinate the temporary facility and operational transitions and to oversee both projects through completion.
Analysis
Need for Construction Management Services
Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71 are advancing from the design phase into procurement and construction. Although Accenture LLP is currently providing preconstruction services under a previously approved task order, expanded construction management services are now needed to oversee construction and support the successful delivery of both projects.
Use of former Sheriff’s Substation
Construction of the two fire stations is anticipated to occur concurrently, requiring fire personnel to operate from a temporary facility to maintain uninterrupted emergency response services throughout the estimated two-year construction period. The former Sheriff’s Substation, which is expected to become available upon expiration of the current lease in December 2026, has been identified as the preferred temporary location because it can support emergency response coverage for the service areas of both stations while utilizing an existing facility that can be adapted for fire operations. Compared with establishing two separate temporary stations using modular facilities, this approach is anticipated to reduce costs and implementation time associated with temporary structures, site improvements, utility connections, and other supporting infrastructure.
377
Temporary Fire Station Approach Estimated Cost
Approach 1 – Establish Two Separate Temporary Fire Stations Temporary Fire Station 33 $2.0 - $3.5 M
Temporary Fire Station 71 $2.0 - $3.5 M
Total Estimated Cost – Approach 1 $4.0 - $7.0 M
Approach 2- Utilize Former Sheriff’s Substation
Former Sheriff’s Substation – Apparatus Shade
Structure
$1.0 Million
Former Sheriff’s – Interior Building improvements $500,000 Total – Former Sheriffs Substation $1.5 Million
Estimated Cost Savings $2.5-$5.5 Million
The former Sheriff’s Substation is centrally located between Fire Stations 33 and 67, allowing the City to maintain operations from a single temporary fire station rather than establishing multiple temporary facilities. The existing City-owned facility includes restrooms, showers, a kitchen, multiple office spaces that can be converted into dorm rooms, existing emergency support infrastructure that can be adapted for CAL FIRE operations, and a secure block wall with gated access to protect emergency apparatus and equipment.
Utilizing the former Sheriff’s Substation is anticipated to provide significant cost and schedule savings compared with establishing two separate temporary fire stations. Based on preliminary estimates, establishing two temporary facilities would cost approximately $4 million to $7 million, compared with approximately $1.5 million to adapt the former Sheriff’s Substation for temporary fire operations, resulting in estimated cost savings of approximately $2.5 million to $5.5 million. In addition, use of the existing facility is anticipated to provide approximately six months to one year in schedule savings by avoiding or reducing the time required for temporary site selection, approvals, site preparation, modular facility installation, utility connections, fencing, generators, and other temporary infrastructure. Actual cost and schedule savings will depend on the final improvements required to prepare the former Sheriff’s Substation for fire operations and will be refined as project planning and cost estimates are completed.
City staff has coordinated with CAL FIRE regarding the proposed use of the facility. CAL FIRE has analyzed the former Sheriff’s Substation as a temporary fire station location and confirmed that operating from this site would maintain the City’s overall average emergency response time within the four-minute response standard. CAL FIRE has also determined that the site is suitable for temporary fire operations with minor tenant improvements, including conversion of select office spaces into dorm rooms, installation of additional kitchen equipment, plumbing and electrical upgrades to accommodate laundry facilities, and installation of shore power for the ambulance unit
The proposed task order includes coordination of the relocation to and operation of the temporary facility, design and construction oversight for the required tenant improvements, and construction management services to support continued fire operations and oversee both fire station projects through completion.
378
Project Schedule
Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71 are anticipated to proceed on generally concurrent schedules, with construction beginning following establishment of temporary fire operations at the former Sheriff’s Substation.
The schedule is preliminary and will continue to be refined as the projects advance through design, bidding, and construction.
Scope of Services
The proposed task order expands Accenture LLP's scope of services to provide construction management (CM) support for the temporary use of the former Sheriff's Substation as an interim fire facility during construction of Fire Stations 33 and 71. This task includes CM services associated with the temporary facility, including coordination of tenant improvements, operational modifications, occupancy readiness, and the relocation of personnel, fire apparatus, and equipment necessary to maintain uninterrupted fire operations.
The task order also includes comprehensive construction management services for the Fire Station 33 Tenant Improvement Project and the Fire Station 71 Reconstruction Project.
Services include contract administration, coordination of construction inspections, schedule and budget monitoring, contractor and stakeholder coordination, quality assurance and quality control, environmental compliance monitoring, stormwater pollution prevention plan compliance, hazardous materials compliance, special and deputy inspections, commissioning, project documentation, warranty support, and project closeout.
The proposed task order is organized into three primary tasks corresponding to the major phases and components of the projects. The estimated cost for each task is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Proposed Task Order Cost Breakdown
Task 1 – Sheriff’s Substation Temporary Operations Support $ 165,830 Task 2 – Fire Station 33 (CFA00017) Tenant Improvements $ 1,300,890 Task 3 – Fire Station 71 (CFA00019) Reconstruction $ 1,628,390 Allowance – Labor Rate Adjustments and Escalation $ 176,100 Total Task Order $ 3,271,210
Project Milestones Anticipated Timing
Building and Safety Review In Progress
Former Sheriff’s Substation
Available Q4 2026
Establish Temporary Fire
Operations Q1 2027
Begin Fire Station 33 and 71
Construction Q2 2027
Complete Construction Q2 2029
379
Consultant Qualifications
Accenture LLP is one of the City’s qualified firms under its on-call construction management services agreement and has extensive knowledge of the City’s capital improvement program.
In addition to providing preconstruction services for Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71, Accenture LLP currently serves as the construction manager for the Fire Station 102 project.
Through this work, the firm has developed a thorough understanding of the City’s project delivery processes, coordination requirements, and CAL FIRE’s operational needs. Continuing with Accenture LLP will maintain continuity from design through construction, reduce the time and effort required to bring a new consultant up to speed, and promote efficient coordination among the City, PBK Architects, CAL FIRE, contractors, and other project participants.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act because it is an administrative, organizational, procedural, fiscal, or informational activity that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.
Legal Review
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.
Financial Impact
Funding for this project is included in the approved Fiscal Year 2026–27 Financial Plan and Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program under Fire Fund Account No. 2304220-4400200. In Fiscal Year 2025–26, the City allocated $2.4 million in Measure G funding for the project.
Approval of this action will have no impact on the General Fund.
Fire Stations 33 & 71:
Authorized Budgets
Date
Authorized Fund 230
FY 22-23 Original Budget 7/1/2022 28,000.00
FY 23-24 Appropriation 7/1/2023 93,500.00
FY 24-25 Appropriation 7/1/2024 951,852.08
FY 25-26 Appropriation 7/1/2025 3,000,000.00
FY 26-27 Appropriation 7/1/2026 24,620,000.00
Total Authorized Budget to Date 28,693,352.08
Less: Authorized Expenditures
Date
Authorized Fund 230
Constructability Review 7/12/2023 138,300.00
Building Assessments 7/26/2023 68,000.00
Architectural Design Svcs 7/1/2026 1,536,700.00
Misc. Costs (Permits & Staff Time) 58,442.80
Total Authorized Expenditures to Date 1,801,442.80
380
Construction Management Svcs:
Accenture LLP (Current Request) 8/20/2026 3,271,210.00
Remaining Project Budget Available 23,620,699.28
Attachments
1. CFA00017 and CFA00019 Task Order Form
2. CFA00017 and CFA00019 Accenture LLP’s Proposal
381
Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist
Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations.
1. Site-Specific Property Interest
Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the project site:
Fire Station 33: 44-400 Town Center Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Fire Station 71: 73-995 Country Club Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Former Sheriff’s Substation, 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260 Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2).
2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract?
☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the party: Accenture LLP, including its disregarded entity, Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Improvements, LLC.
Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 382
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TASK ORDER
Contract No / P.O. #:
Task Order No.:
Task Order Bonds Needed?: YES NO
Account No.:
Project No.:
Vendor No.:
Description of Work
Contract Purpose:
Contractor Name:
Project Manager:
The dollar amount for this task order is:
_________________________________________________________ dollars and ___/100 (___________) Estimated Completion Date:
The undersigned Contractor hereby agrees that it will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may be otherwise noted above, and perform all work specified above in accordance with the Agreement identified above and will accept as full payment therefore in the amount shown above.
NOTE: No payments will be made prior
to City Manager or Council approval
1. APPROVED BY:
_____________________
City Manager 2. ACCEPTED BY: ______________________
Contractor
This Task Order is hereby entered into on:
The Contractor is hereby authorized to perform the following work subject to the provisions of the Agreement identified above:
Retention Required?: YES NO
3. CERTIFIED FUNDS
AVAILABLE:
_____________________
Deputy Finance Director
C44810 25262167 TOCFA00017-19 ✔
✔
2304220-4400200 CFA00017 & CFA00019 V0016597 Construction Management Services Lucero Leyva August 20, 2026 The proposed task order consists of the following three components:
Task 1 – Sheriff's Substation Temporary Operations Support Provide construction management and operational transition support for the temporary occupancy of the Sheriff's Substation during construction of Fire Station 33 and Fire Station 71.Coordinate tenant improvements, occupancy readiness, personnel and apparatus relocations, and other modifications necessary to maintain uninterrupted fire operations.
Task 2 – Fire Station 33 Tenant Improvement Project
Provide comprehensive construction management services during the renovation of Fire Station 33.Services include contract administration, construction oversight, quality assurance/quality control, environmental compliance monitoring, special and deputy inspections, schedule and budget monitoring, commissioning, and project closeout.
Task 3 – Fire Station 71 Reconstruction Project
Provide comprehensive construction management services for the demolition and reconstruction of Fire Station 71.Services include contract administration, construction oversight, quality assurance/quality control, environmental compliance monitoring, special and deputy inspections, schedule and budget monitoring, commissioning, and project closeout.
The detailed description of the work is defined in Accenture's proposal dated June 29, 2026.
THREE MILLION, TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-ONE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED TEN 00 $ 3,271,210.00 Accenture LLP through its disregarded entity of Accenture Infr Accenture LLP through its disregarded entity of Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Improvements, 383
384
300 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 14TH FLOOR, IRVINE, CA 92618 June 29, 2026
City of Palm Desert
Lucero Leyva, Project Manager
73510 Fred Waring Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION TEMPORARY OPERATIONS SUPPORT, FIRE STATION NO. 33 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS, AND FIRE STATION NO. 71
RECONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION PHASE TASK ORDER PROPOSAL – REQUEST FOR SERVICES Dear Ms. Leyva,
This Request for Services is issued pursuant to Professional Services Agreement No. C44810, dated February 16, 2023, Amendment No. 1 dated August 12, 2025, Amendment No. 2 dated February 3, 2025, Amendment No. 3 dated September 16, 2025, and Amendment No. 4 dated March 18, 2026 between the City of Palm Desert and Accenture Infrastructure & Capital Projects for On-Call Construction Management Services.
In accordance with the Agreement, the City has requested Accenture to provide construction management and inspection services associated with the Sheriff's Substation Temporary Operations Support Project, Fire Station No. 33 Tenant Improvement Project, and Fire Station No. 71 Reconstruction Project.
Unless otherwise specified herein, the performance of services described in this Task Order shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Agreement No. C44810 and shall be performed on an on-call, as-needed basis as authorized by the City.
No services shall be performed unless authorized by the City through a fully executed Task Order.
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Palm Desert is advancing two public safety facility projects consisting of tenant improvements to Fire Station No. 33 and reconstruction of Fire Station No. 71. To maintain uninterrupted emergency response operations during construction activities, the City is currently planning to utilize the existing Sheriff's Substation as a temporary operations facility for CAL FIRE personnel, apparatus, equipment, and support functions.
Under the current implementation strategy, the Sheriff's Substation will serve as a temporary operations facility supporting fire department operations during construction of Fire Station No. 33 and Fire Station No. 71. Temporary occupancy will require coordination among the City, CAL FIRE, Sheriff's Department, design team, and construction contractors to support continuous operations throughout the construction period.
Based on current planning discussions, the City intends to utilize the existing Sheriff's Substation with limited tenant improvements and operational modifications necessary to accommodate temporary fire station operations. Potential improvements may include temporary apparatus accommodations and shade structures, personnel support spaces, communications and alerting system integration, equipment relocation, occupancy readiness activities, and other operational modifications required to support fire department operations. The final scope and extent of temporary facility improvements remain under development and will be refined as project planning progresses.
Accenture's services under this Task Order are limited to construction phase support services, operational transition coordination, occupancy support, and project closeout activities associated with the Sheriff's Substation Temporary Operations Support Project, Fire Station No. 33 Tenant Improvement Project, and Fire Station No. 71 Reconstruction Project. Design review, constructability review, programming, budgeting, and other preconstruction services are being performed under separate task orders and are excluded from the scope of this proposal. 385
300 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 14TH FLOOR, IRVINE, CA 92618 TASK 1 – SHERIFF’S SUBSTATION TEMPORARY OPERATIONS SUPPORT
1. Task Description
Construction Management, and Quality Assurance / Quality Control support services associated with temporary occupancy of the Sheriff's Substation and implementation of operational modifications necessary to support temporary fire department operations during construction of Fire Station No. 33 and Fire Station No. 71.
2. Scope of Work
Accenture I&CP shall provide construction phase support services associated with temporary occupancy of the Sheriff's Substation, including support for implementation of tenant improvements, operational modifications, occupancy readiness activities, and transition planning necessary to accommodate temporary fire department operations.
Services may include construction management, construction inspection coordination, quality assurance oversight, schedule monitoring, budget monitoring, contractor coordination, stakeholder coordination, project documentation, progress reporting, occupancy readiness support, operational transition planning, coordination of personnel, apparatus and equipment relocation, coordination of temporary apparatus accommodations and shade structures, communications and alerting system integration support, commissioning support, project closeout, and other related construction phase support services.
The scope associated with the Sheriff's Substation is based on current planning assumptions and includes support for limited tenant improvements and operational modifications necessary to facilitate temporary fire station operations.
TASK 2 – FIRE STATION No. 33 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS
1. Task Description
Construction Management, Quality Assurance / Quality Control, QA Survey, and Environmental Compliance support services associated with the Fire Station No. 33 Tenant Improvement Project.
2. Scope of Work
Accenture I&CP shall provide construction phase support services associated with the Fire Station No. 33 Tenant Improvement Project.
Services may include construction management, construction inspection coordination, quality assurance oversight, schedule monitoring, budget monitoring, contractor coordination, stakeholder coordination, project documentation, progress reporting, quality management, commissioning support, project closeout, warranty support, and other related construction phase support services necessary to support successful delivery of the project.
Services associated with temporary occupancy of the Sheriff's Substation, operational transition planning, and temporary facility improvements are included under Task 1 and are excluded from this task.
TASK 3 – FIRE STATION NO. 71 RECONSTRUCTION
1. Task Description
Construction Management, Quality Assurance / Quality Control, QA Survey, and Environmental Compliance support services associated with the Fire Station No. 71 Reconstruction Project.
2. Scope of Work
Accenture I&CP shall provide construction phase support services associated with the Fire Station No. 71 Reconstruction Project.
386
300 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 14TH FLOOR, IRVINE, CA 92618 Services may include construction management, construction inspection coordination, quality assurance oversight, schedule monitoring, budget monitoring, contractor coordination, stakeholder coordination, project documentation, progress reporting, quality management, commissioning support, project closeout, warranty support, and other related construction phase support services necessary to support successful delivery of the project.
Services associated with temporary occupancy of the Sheriff's Substation, operational transition planning, and temporary facility improvements are included under Task 1 and are excluded from this task.
TASK ORDER ESTIMATED FEE
Task 1 – Sheriff’s Substation Temporary Operations Support $165,830.00 as detailed in Attachment A – Sheriff’s Substation Fee Proposal.
SHERIFF’S SUBSTATION SUPPORT SUBTASK ESTIMATED FEE – CM & INSPECTION SERVICES SUBTASK ORDER ESTIMATED FEE $
A – CM Services (Accenture) $165,830.00
Total $165,830.00
Task 2 – Fire Station No. 33 Tenant Improvements $1,300,890.00 as detailed in Attachment C – FS 33 Fee Proposal.
FS 33 SUBTASK ESTIMATED FEE – CM & INSPECTION SERVICES
SUBTASK ORDER ESTIMATED FEE $
A – CM Services (Accenture) $1,015,890.00
B – CQA (Verdantas) $200,000.00
C – QA Survey (Michael Baker) $35,000.00
D – Environmental Compliance (UltraSystems) $50,000.00
Total $1,300,890.00
Task 3 – Fire Station No. 71 Reconstruction $1,628,390.00 as detailed in Attachment E – FS 71 Fee Proposal.
FS 71 SUBTASK ESTIMATED FEE – CM & INSPECTION SERVICES
SUBTASK ORDER ESTIMATED FEE $
A – CM Services (Accenture) $1,150,890.00
B – CQA (Verdantas) $380,000.00
C – QA Survey (Michael Baker) $35,000.00
D – Environmental Compliance (UltraSystems) $62,500.00
Total $1,628,390.00
Allowance – Potential Labor Rate Adjustment / Escalation $176,100.00 as detailed in Attachment G - Allowance – Potential Labor Rate Adjustment / Escalation.
An allowance has been included for potential future adjustments to Accenture labor rates only, pursuant to Exhibit B of Contract No. C44810, which permits annual labor rate adjustments at the time of contract renewal, subject to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), All Urban Consumers – Riverside Area. This allowance is provided for budgetary purposes only and does not constitute an approved rate increase. Any adjustment to labor rates shall be subject to City approval 387
300 SPECTRUM CENTER DRIVE, 14TH FLOOR, IRVINE, CA 92618 and execution of the appropriate contract amendment or task order modification. The allowance calculation is provided in Attachment G – Allowance – Potential Labor Rate Adjustment.
TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED TASK ORDER AMOUNT $3,271,210.00
SCHEDULE (PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
Task 1 currently anticipated to be substantially complete by February 2027 Task 2 currently anticipated to be substantially complete by June 2028 Task 3 is currently anticipated to be substantially complete by October 2028 The overall period of performance for this Task Order is anticipated to extend through October 2028. Staffing assumptions and anticipated resource utilization are detailed in Attachment B,D and F – Staff Utilization Plans.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
This Task Order and the “Agreement” constitute the entire “Agreement” between the City of Palm Desert and Accenture I&CP. Except as specifically set forth in this Task Order, the “Agreement” shall remain in full force and effect.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Attachment A – Sheriff’s Substation Fee Proposal
• Attachment B – Sheriff’s Substation Staff Utilization • Attachment C – FS 33 Fee Proposal
• Attachment D – FS 33 Staff Utilization
• Attachment E – FS 71 Fee Proposal
• Attachment F – FS 71 Staff Utilization
• Attachment G – Allowance – Potential Labor Rate Adjustment / Escalation We believe that this proposal fully aligns with the project requirements and your expectations. With your approval, we are ready to proceed and begin the next steps of our collaboration.
Please review the proposal at your earliest convenience, and feel free to reach out with any questions or if further clarifications are needed. Should everything meet your approval, we look forward to receiving your confirmation to proceed with the project.
Sincerely,
Tyson Atwood, P.E., QSD Tony Gatoff, CCM
Sr. VP | Principal-in-Charge Director
Cell 805.459.7697 Cell 562.743.8133
[email protected] [email protected]
388
ACCENTURE I&CP
BUDGET WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sheriff's Substation Temporary Operational Support Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Apr-27 May-27 Jun-27 Jul-27 Aug-27 Sep-27 Oct-27 Nov-27 Dec-27 Jan-28 Feb-28 Mar-28 Apr-28 May-28 Jun-28 SCOPE OF SERVICES (Task Name)FORECASTED MILESTONES t
Notice to Proceed (CM Services) t
Kick off Project t Design / Feasibility / Constructability Review t Design / Final Design t Issue Bid Solicitation (Contractor IFB) t Contractor Bids Due t Fire Operations Transition Complete (Temp Facilities) t Contractor Limited NTP Issued / Approved. t
Contractor Full NTP Issued / Approved t
Construct Facility t
Temporary Facility Closeout t Begin Operations at the Facility tPROJECT DESIGN Initial Design Review (Design Development Docs) Constructability Review (100% CDs) Final Design Documents (100% CDs) Permitting (Assistance, if needed)TEMPORARY FACILITIES PROGRAM (PLANNING THROUGH DEMOBILIZATION) Phase 1 – Operational Planning & Requirements CAL FIRE Operational Requirements Coordination Sheriff Substation Existing Conditions Verification Temporary Facility Needs Assessment & Gap Analysis Operational Requirements Approval Milestone Phase 2 – Scope Development & Budgeting Develop Temporary Facility Improvement Scope Develop FF&E / Equipment Relocation Requirements Develop Budget & Funding Requirements City / CAL FIRE Review & Approval Scope & Budget Approval Milestone Phase 3 – Design & Procurement Support PBK Temporary Facility Design Coordination Temporary Facility Scope Integration into FS33/FS71 Bid Package Budget Reconciliation & Bid Package Review City / CAL FIRE Review & Approval Design Complete Milestone Phase 4 – Sheriff Substation Improvements Contractor Mobilization & Existing Conditions Verification Interior Tenant Improvements Communications / IT / Alerting Improvements Apparatus Cover / Exterior Improvements Furniture & Equipment Relocation Planning Operational Readiness Review CAL FIRE Acceptance Walkthrough Fire Operations Transition Complete Phase 5 – Transition Back to Permanent Facility Transition Planning & Coordination Relocate Personnel & Equipment Restore Sheriff Operational Areas Remove Temporary Fire Department Improvements Final Repairs / Restoration Final Walkthrough Temporary Facility Closeout MilestoneCONTRACTOR BIDDING (PRE-QUALIFICATION of CONTRACTORS)CONTRACTOR NOTICE TO PROCEEDPROCUREMENTPRE-CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTIONCOMMISSIONING & CLOSE-OUT Commissioning Close-out MONTH #--> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ACCENTURE (STAFFING) Assigned Tasks Scope of Services Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Apr-27 May-27 Jun-27 Jul-27 Aug-27 Sep-27 Oct-27 Nov-27 Dec-27 Jan-28 Feb-28 Mar-28 Apr-28 May-28 Jun-28 Hours Rates Actuals Principal 0 255.00$ -$ Sr. Construction Manager 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2E 24 24 24 24 24 32 32 32 40 256 210.00$ 53,760.00$ Construction Manager, Associate 2B.1, 2B.2, 2B.3, 2C.1,
2C.2, 2C.3, 2D, 2E.1,
2E.2
40 40 24 40 50 40 30 30 30 324 180.00$ 58,320.00$
Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - On-site 2D 40 20 20 30 110 185.00$ 20,350.00$ Admin, Senior 6.1, 6.2, 7A.1, 7A.2, 8A, 8B 30 30 30 30 120 110.00$ 13,200.00$ Sr. Scheduler 7A.1, 7A.2 20 20 185.00$ 3,700.00$
Estimator As-needed 20 20 185.00$ 3,700.00$ Technical Expert (Claims) 0 235.00$ -$ Labor Compliance As-needed 40 10 10 60 105.00$ 6,300.00$ - 0 -$ -$ - 0 -$ -$ - 0 -$ -$ Accenture Labor -$ -$ 15,940.00$ 12,240.00$ 9,360.00$ 12,240.00$ 14,040.00$ 32,520.00$ 20,170.00$ 20,170.00$ 22,650.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 159,330.00$ Monthly Field Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Misc Office Expenses -$ CM Software (C-MIS) - Lump Sum 6,500.00$ 6,500.00$ Markup On Subs 0% -$ Accenture Totals -$ -$ 22,440.00$ 12,240.00$ 9,360.00$ 12,240.00$ 14,040.00$ 32,520.00$ 20,170.00$ 20,170.00$ 22,650.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,830.00$ Subconsultants
Verdantas (Soils, Materials Testing & Special Inspection) -$ Michael Baker (QA Survey) -$ Ultra Systems (Environmental) -$ Subconsultant Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Estimated Monthly Invoice -$ -$ 22,440.00$ 12,240.00$ 9,360.00$ 12,240.00$ 14,040.00$ 32,520.00$ 20,170.00$ 20,170.00$ 22,650.00$ -$ -$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 165,830.00$ Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1Q2
ATTACHMENT A - SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION FEE PROPOSAL
389
Accenture
Key Personnel (*)
Apr-26
May-26
Jun-26
Jul-26
Aug-26
Sep-26
Oct-26
Nov-26
Dec-26
Jan-27
Feb-27
Mar-27
Apr-27
May-27
Jun-27
Jul-27
Aug-27
Sep-27
Oct-27
Nov-27
Dec-27
Jan-28
Feb-28
Mar-28
Apr-28
May-28
Jun-28
Sheriff's Substation Temporary Operational Support
Principal - Tyson Atwood 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% * Sr. Construction Manager - Tony Gatoff 0% 0% 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 20% 20% 20% 25% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%* Construction Manager, Associate - Kirk Streets 0% 0% 25% 25% 15% 25% 31% 25% 19% 19% 19% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%* Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - On-site - Dakota Mebane 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 13% 13% 19% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%* Admin, Senior - Rachael Highley 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 19% 19% 19% 19% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Sr. Scheduler - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Estimator - Dustin Reinhardt 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Technical Expert (Claims) - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Labor Compliance - Rachael Highley 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 6% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Design / Temp Facility Move / GC Procurement / Precon Limited NTP (3-months) Full NTP (Construction 14-months) Closeout
ATTACHMENT B - SHERIFF'S SUBSTATION STAFF UTILIZATION
390
ACCENTURE I&CP
BUDGET WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Fire Station No. 33 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Apr-27 May-27 Jun-27 Jul-27 Aug-27 Sep-27 Oct-27 Nov-27 Dec-27 Jan-28 Feb-28 Mar-28 Apr-28 May-28 Jun-28 SCOPE OF SERVICES (Task Name)FORECASTED MILESTONES t
Notice to Proceed (CM Services) t
Kick off Project t Design / Feasibility / Constructability Review t Design / Final Design t Issue Bid Solicitation (Contractor IFB) t Contractor Bids Due t Fire Operations Transition Complete (Temp Facilities) t Contractor Limited NTP Issued / Approved. t
Contractor Full NTP Issued / Approved t
Construct Facility t
Temporary Facility Closeout t Begin Operations at the Facility tPROJECT DESIGN Initial Design Review (Design Development Docs) Constructability Review (100% CDs) Final Design Documents (100% CDs) Permitting (Assistance, if needed)TEMPORARY FACILITIES PROGRAM (PLANNING THROUGH DEMOBILIZATION) Phase 1 – Operational Planning & Requirements Phase 2 – Scope Development & Budgeting Phase 3 – Design & Procurement Support Phase 4 – Sheriff Substation Improvements Phase 5 – Transition Back to Permanent FacilityCONTRACTOR BIDDING (PRE-QUALIFICATION of CONTRACTORS) Prepare Solicitation for Contractor RFP Issue Bid Solicitation (Contractor IFB) Mandatory Pre-bid Meeting Contractor Bids Due Review Contractor Bids (Bid Analysis) Submit Recommendation of Lowest Responsible Bidder to Owner Contractor Selection / Award CONTRACTOR NOTICE TO PROCEED Contractor Limited NTP Issued / Approved Contractor Full NTP Issued / ApprovedPROCUREMENT Required Precon Submittals (Identified in kick-off mtg) Procure Long Lead Items (i.e. Switchgear, Generator, etc) PRE-CONSTRUCTION Project Contract Document Setup Pre-Construction MeetingCONSTRUCTION Construct Facility (3-months for LNTP / Sheriffs Substation + 14-months construction) Construction Activity (Limited NTP) Construction Activity (Full NTP)COMMISSIONING & CLOSE-OUT Commissioning Substantial Completion Close-out MONTH #--> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ACCENTURE (STAFFING) Assigned Tasks Scope of Services Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Apr-27 May-27 Jun-27 Jul-27 Aug-27 Sep-27 Oct-27 Nov-27 Dec-27 Jan-28 Feb-28 Mar-28 Apr-28 May-28 Jun-28 Hours Rates Actuals Principal 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 34 255.00$ 8,670.00$ Sr. Construction Manager 3, 4, 5, 6, 7A,8A, 8B 24 40 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 40 40 40 1264 210.00$ 265,440.00$ Construction Manager, Associate
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4, 5.1,
5.2, 6.1, 6.2, 7A.1,
7A.2, 8A, 8B
16 40 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 50 50 40 1386 180.00$ 249,480.00$ Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - On-site 6.2, 7A.1, 7A.2, 8A 20 20 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 1130 185.00$ 209,050.00$ Admin, Senior 6.1, 6.2, 7A.1, 7A.2, 8A, 8B 40 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 50 50 40 1370 110.00$ 150,700.00$ Sr. Scheduler 7A.1, 7A.2 20 20 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 264 185.00$ 48,840.00$ Estimator As-needed 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 28 185.00$ 5,180.00$ Technical Expert (Claims) As-needed 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 28 235.00$ 6,580.00$ Labor Compliance As-needed 40 10 10 40 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 250 105.00$ 26,250.00$ - 0 -$ -$ - 0 -$ -$ - 0 -$ -$ Accenture Labor -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,920.00$ -$ -$ 11,600.00$ 21,900.00$ 30,300.00$ 40,660.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 63,310.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 24,460.00$ 23,410.00$ 24,710.00$ 970,190.00$ Monthly Field Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ -$ -$ 23,400.00$ Misc Office Expenses 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 6,300.00$ CM Software (C-MIS) - Lump Sum 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 16,000.00$ Markup On Subs 0% -$ Accenture Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,920.00$ -$ -$ 21,250.00$ 23,550.00$ 31,950.00$ 42,310.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00 $ 64,960.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 69,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 26,110.00$ 23,410.00$ 24,710.00$ 1,015,890.00$ Subconsultants
Verdantas (Soils, Materials Testing & Special Inspection) 10,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 200,000.00$ Michael Baker (QA Survey) 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 35,000.00$ Ultra Systems (Environmental) 15,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50,000.00$ Subconsultant Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 27,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 22,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 285,000.00$ Estimated Monthly Invoice -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,920.00$ -$ -$ 46,250.00$ 43,550.00 $ 61,950.00$ 77,310.00$ 89,310.00$ 89,310.00$ 92,460.00$ 84,310.00$ 71,810.00$ 71,810.00$ 71,810.00$ 71,810.00$ 79,810.00$ 71,810.00$ 71,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 61,810.00$ 26,110.00$ 23,410.00 $ 24,710.00$ 1,300,890.00$ Q2Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1Q2
ATTACHMENT C - FS 33 FEE PROPOSAL
391
Accenture
Key Personnel (*)
Apr-26
May-26
Jun-26
Jul-26
Aug-26
Sep-26
Oct-26
Nov-26
Dec-26
Jan-27
Feb-27
Mar-27
Apr-27
May-27
Jun-27
Jul-27
Aug-27
Sep-27
Oct-27
Nov-27
Dec-27
Jan-28
Feb-28
Mar-28
Apr-28
May-28
Jun-28
Fire Station No. 33
Principal - Tyson Atwood 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * Sr. Construction Manager - Tony Gatoff 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 25% 25% 25%* Construction Manager, Associate - Kirk Streets 0% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 25% 31% 31% 31% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 31% 31% 25%* Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - On-site - Dakota Mebane 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 13% 31% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0%* Admin, Senior - Rachael Highley 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 31% 31% 31% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 31% 31% 25% Sr. Scheduler - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 13% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 0% 0% 0%Estimator - Dustin Reinhardt 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%Technical Expert (Claims) - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%Labor Compliance - Rachael Highley 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 6% 6% 25% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 0% 25%SubconsultantsVerdantas (Soils, Materials Testing & Special Inspection) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 13% 13% 13% 13% 10% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Michael Baker (QA Survey) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% 5% 5% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Ultra Systems (Environmental) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 5% 5% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Design / Temp Facility Move / GC Procurement / Precon Limited NTP (3-months) Full NTP (Construction 14-months) Closeout ATTACHMENT D - FS 33 STAFF UTILIZATION
392
ACCENTURE I&CP
BUDGET WORKSHEET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Fire Station No. 71 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Apr-27 May-27 Jun-27 Jul-27 Aug-27 Sep-27 Oct-27 Nov-27 Dec-27 Jan-28 Feb-28 Mar-28 Apr-28 May-28 Jun-28 Jul-28 Aug-28 Sep-28 Oct-28 Nov-28 Dec-28 SCOPE OF SERVICES (Task Name)FORECASTED MILESTONES t
Notice to Proceed (CM Services) t
Kick off Project t Design / Feasibility / Constructability Review t Design / Final Design t
Issue Bid Solicitation (Contractor IFB) t Contractor Bids Due t Fire Operations Transition Complete (Temp Facilities) t Contractor Limited NTP Issued / Approved. t
Contractor Full NTP Issued / Approved t
Construct Facility t
Temporary Facility Closeout t
Begin Operations at the Facility t
1 PROJECT DESIGN
Initial Design Review (Design Development Docs) Constructability Review (100% CDs) Final Design Documents (100% CDs) Permitting (Assistance, if needed) 2 Temporary Facilities Program (Planning through Demobilization) 2A Phase 1 – FS71 Transition Planning2B Phase 2 – Occupancy Transition 2C Phase 3 – Return to Permanent Facility
3 Contractor Bidding (Pre-Qualification of Contractors) Prepare Solicitation for Contractor RFP Issue Bid Solicitation (Contractor IFB)
3.1 Mandatory Pre-bid Meeting
Contractor Bids Due
3.2 Review Contractor Bids (Bid Analysis)3.3 Submit Recommendation of Lowest Responsible Bidder to Owner Contractor Selection / Award
4 CONTRACTOR NOTICE TO PROCEED
Contractor Limited NTP Issued / Approved Contractor Full NTP Issued / Approved 5 PROCUREMENT
5.1 Required Precon Submittals (Identified in kick-off mtg)5.2 Procure Long Lead Items (i.e. Switchgear, Generator, etc) 6 PRE-CONSTRUCTION
6.1 Project Contract Document Setup6.2 Pre-Construction Meeting 7 CONSTRUCTION
7A Construct Facility (3-months LNTP + 16-months)
7A.1 Construction Activity (Limited NTP)7A.2 Construction Activity (Full NTP) 8 COMMISSIONING & CLOSE-OUT
8A Commissioning
Substantial Completion
8B Close-out
MONTH #--> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ACCENTURE (STAFFING) Assigned Tasks Scope of Services Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 Jan-27 Feb-27 Mar-27 Apr-27 May-27 Jun-27 Jul-27 Aug-27 Sep-27 Oct-27 Nov-27 Dec-27 Jan-28 Feb-28 Mar-28 Apr-28 May-28 Jun-28 Jul-28 Aug-28 Sep-28 Oct-28 Nov-28 Dec-28 Hours Rates ActualsPrincipal 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 38 255.00$ 9,690.00$ Sr. Construction Manager 3, 4, 5, 6, 7A, 8A, 8B 40 40 40 40 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 40 20 20 1440 210.00$ 302,400.00$ Construction Manager, Associate
3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 4, 5.1, 5.2,
6.1, 6.2, 7A.1, 7A.2, 8A,
8B
40 40 40 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 50 40 1640 180.00$ 295,200.00$ Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - On-site 6.2, 7A.1, 7A.2, 8A 20 20 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 1290 185.00 $ 238,650.00$ Admin, Senior 6.1, 6.2, 7A.1, 7A.2, 8A, 8B 40 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 50 40 1560 110.00$ 171,600.00$ Sr. Scheduler 7A.1, 7A2 20 20 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 296 185.00$ 54,760.00$ Estimator As-needed 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 32 185.00$ 5,920.00$ Technical Expert (Claims) As-needed 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 32 235.00$ 7,520.00$ Labor Compliance As-needed 40 10 10 40 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 270 105.00$ 28,350.00$ - 0 -$ -$ - 0 -$ -$ - 0 -$ -$ Accenture Labor -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,600.00$ 15,600.00$ -$ 11,600.00$ 21,900.00$ 30,300.00$ 40,660.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 63,310.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00 $ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 60,160.00$ 33,160.00$ 19,210.00$ 20,510.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1,114,090.00$ Monthly Field Vehicle -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ 1,300.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,800.00$ Misc Office Expenses -$ CM Software (C-MIS) - Lump Sum 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 16,000.00$ Markup On Subs 0% -$ Accenture Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,600.00$ 15,600.00$ -$ 19,600.00$ 21,900.00$ 30,300.00$ 40,660.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 64,610.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 69,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 34,460.00$ 19,210.00$ 20,510.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1,150,890.00$ Subconsultants
Verdantas (Soils, Materials Testing & Special Inspection) 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 380,000.00$ Michael Baker (QA Survey) 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 35,000.00$ Ultra Systems (Environmental) 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 62,500.00$ Subconsultant Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ - $ -$ -$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 32,500.00$ 32,500.00$ 52,500.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 35,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 10,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ - $ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 477,500.00$ Estimated Monthly Invoice -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,600.00$ 15,600.00$ -$ 19,600.00$ 46,900.00$ 55,300.00$ 75,660.00$ 91,460.00$ 96,460.00$ 97,110.00$ 93,960.00$ 113,960.00$ 111,460.00$ 111,460.00$ 96,460.00$ 99,460.00$ 81,460.00$ 76,460.00$ 71,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 61,460.00$ 34,460.00$ 19,210.00$ 20,510.00$ -$ -$ -$ 1,628,390.00$ Q2 Q4Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3
ATTACHMENT E - FS 71 FEE PROPOSAL
393
Accenture
Key Personnel (*)
Apr-26
May-26
Jun-26
Jul-26
Aug-26
Sep-26
Oct-26
Nov-26
Dec-26
Jan-27
Feb-27
Mar-27
Apr-27
May-27
Jun-27
Jul-27
Aug-27
Sep-27
Oct-27
Nov-27
Dec-27
Jan-28
Feb-28
Mar-28
Apr-28
May-28
Jun-28
Jul-28
Aug-28
Sep-28
Fire Station No. 71
Principal - Tyson Atwood 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * Sr. Construction Manager - Tony Gatoff 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 25% 13% 13%* Construction Manager, Associate - Kirk Streets 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 25% 0% 25% 31% 31% 31% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 31% 25%* Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - On-site - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 13% 31% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 0% 0% 0%* Admin, Senior - Rachael Highley 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 31% 31% 31% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 31% 25% Inspector (Prevailing Wage) - Off-site - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Sr. Scheduler - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13% 13% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 0% 0% 0%Estimator - Dustin Reinhardt 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%Technical Expert (Claims) - TBD 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0%Labor Compliance - Rachael Highley 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 6% 6% 25% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 0% 25% 0%
Subconsultants 0%Verdantas (Soils, Materials Testing & Special Inspection) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 4% 8% 8% 8% 13% 13% 13% 9% 8% 5% 4% 3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Michael Baker (QA Survey) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 3% 3% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%Ultra Systems (Environmental) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4% 4% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Design / GC Procurement / Precon Limited NTP (3-months) Full NTP (Construction 16-months) Closeout ATTACHMENT F - FS 71 STAFF UTILIZATION
394
ESCALATION CALCULATION WORKSHEET
1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor
Subtotal per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours per Cost
Proposal Avg Hourly Rate 5 Year Contract Duration
$ 2,243,610.00 13262 = $169.18 Year 0 Avg Hourly Rate
2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Avg Hourly Rate Proposed Escalation
Year 0 $169.18 + 3.2% = $174.59 Year 0 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $174.59 + 4.0% = $181.57 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $181.57 + 5.0% = $190.65 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $190.65 + 5.0% = $200.18 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated %
Completed Each
Year
Total Hours per Cost
Proposal
Total Hours per
Year
Year 0 0% * 13262 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 0
Year 1 16% * 13262 = 2122 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 62% * 13262 = 8222 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 22% * 13262 = 2918 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * 13262 = 0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Total 100% Total = 13262
4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated
above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above) Cost per Year
Year 0 $169.18 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 0
Year 1 $174.59 * 2122 = $370,478.85 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $181.57 * 8222 = $1,492,893.59 Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $190.65 * 2918 = $556,321.66 Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $0.00 * 0 = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
= $2,419,694.09
= $ 2,243,610.00
= $176,084.09 Transfer to Page 1
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
ATTACHMENT G
ALLOWANCE - POTETNTIAL LABOR RATE ADJUSTMENT
395
396
Fire Station 33 (CFA00017)
Vicinity Map
397
Fire Station 71 (CFA00019)
Vinity Map
398
City of Palm Desert Staff Report
Meeting Date: August 20, 2026
Prepared By: Carlos Flores, AICP, Deputy Director of Development Services Department: Development Services
Subject: Approve a Hillside Development Plan for a New One-Story, 7,600 Square-Foot Single-Family Residence at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos Recommendation
Adopt a resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, Approving a Hillside Development Plan for the Construction of a New Single Family Residence at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos and Finding the Project Exempt from Environmental Review in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.” Executive Summary
Michael Hanes requests approval of a Hillside Development Plan (Precise Plan No. PP25- 0001) for construction of a new one-story, 7,600-square-foot single-family residence on a 2.80- acre hillside parcel located at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos (APN 628-140-008). The project includes a lower-level garage/mechanical area, covered patios, pool, retaining walls, driveway improvements, grading, landscaping, and site lighting. The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). The Architectural Review Commission recommended approval on June 9, 2026 and the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 7, 2026, and adopted a resolution recommending City Council approval.
Staff finds the project is consistent with the Hillside Planned Residential development standards and recommends City Council approve the Hillside Development Plan.
Background
Hillside Planned Residential Design Standards:
On April 23, 2026, the City Council adopted the Hillside Planned Residential Design Standards, which established objective standards for single-family development within the Hillside Planned Residential (HPR) zoning district and a streamlined administrative review process for new applications. Since this application was deemed complete prior to the adoption of those standards, it is processed under the previous Hillside Development Plan provisions of the Palm Desert Municipal Code, which require City Council approval following a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Accordingly, this project is not eligible for the streamlined administrative review process.
Property Description:
399
The project site is a 2.80-acre vacant parcel located within the Hillside Planned Residential (HPR) zoning district south of Highway 111. Access is provided from Calle de Los Campesinos via an existing private access easement.
Exhibit 1 - Vicinity Map
Project Description:
The project consists of a new one-story, 7,600-square-foot single-family residence with a lower-level garage, pool, driveway improvements, retaining walls, grading, landscaping, and related site improvements. The residence is located on the lower portion of the site to preserve the steeper hillside and avoid ridgeline development. The project includes retaining walls, drainage improvements, a motor court, pool, and desert landscaping designed to minimize visual impacts.
Table 1 – Project Summary
Item Description
Applicant Michael Hanes
Location 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos
APN 628-140-008
Site Area 2.80 acres
Zoning Hillside Planned Residential (HPR)
General Plan Residential
Request Hillside Development Plan (PP25-0001)
Proposed Residence One-story, 7,600 sq. ft.
CEQA Class 3 Exemption (Section 15303)
ARC Action Recommended Approval (June 9, 2026)
Planning Commission Recommended Approval (July 7, 2026) 400
Architecture:
The residence incorporates a low-profile contemporary desert design with flat rooflines, earthtoned materials, and extensive glazing oriented toward interior views. The project incorporates drought-tolerant desert landscaping, shielded lighting, and rock groundcover consistent with the surrounding hillside environment.
Exhibit 2 – Primary Elevation Facing West
Zoning Ordinance Summary:
The project is located within the Hillside Planned Residential (HPR) zoning district and is subject to Hillside Development Plan and Precise Plan review. Table 2 summarizes the project's consistency with the applicable development standards.
Table 2 – Zoning Summary
Topic Standard Project Conforms
Use Single-family dwelling
permitted in HPR
New single-family residence Yes
Density 1 unit per 5 acres; all
lots entitled to at least
1 unit
1 unit on 2.80-acre parcel Yes
Building pad
disturbance
Maximum 10,000 sq.
ft. permanently
disturbed by grading
for building pad
Approximately 9,750 sq. ft. Yes
Access road /
driveway disturbance
Maximum 3,000 sq. ft.
permanent grading
disturbance for access
Approximately 2,500 sq. ft. Yes
401
to approved building
pad
Maximum dwelling
unit/garage/accessory
size
4,000 sq. ft. unless
modified through
Precise Plan/HDP
process
Project includes 4,345 sq. ft.
main living area plus
additional lowerlevel/storage/garage/covered
patio areas as shown on
plans
Review
through
Precise
Plan/HDP
Development on
ridges
Development on or
across ridges
prohibited
Residence located below
upper hillside/ridge areas
Yes
Visual impact Eliminate or minimize
visual impact on the
City to the maximum
extent feasible
Low-profile architecture,
neutral colors, limited pad
disturbance, and site-sensitive
landscape treatment
Yes
Analysis
The project has been designed and conditioned to minimize grading and visual impacts by locating the residence on the lower portion of the site and preserving the steeper hillside in its natural condition. Staff finds the project complies with the applicable Hillside Planned Residential development standards and supports the required findings for approval.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On July 7, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and received one public comment in opposition. Commissioners discussed the requested dwelling size modification, drainage, landscaping, and private roadway access. Staff addressed each topic and the Planning Commission recommended approval by a 4-0 vote.
Public Notice
Public noticing for the City Council hearing was conducted in accordance with Palm Desert Municipal Code requirements. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Desert Sun newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date. Notices were mailed to property owners within 4,000 feet of the project site and a notice was posted at the project site. During the Planning Commission meeting, the City received one public comment in opposition from a nearby resident and one public comment in writing regarding short-term rentals.
Environmental Review
The City of Palm Desert, in its capacity as Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with CEQA. The Project has been reviewed through the City’s Hillside Development Plan process to evaluate grading, siting, visual impacts, hillside disturbance, and consistency with applicable 402
development standards. In accordance with the State CEQA guidelines, the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, in that the Project consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small structures. Examples of Class 3 exemptions include single-family residence, second dwelling units, duplexes, and multi-family residential structures totaling no more than four dwelling units. Here, the Project consists of a Hillside Development Plan for the construction of one new 7,600-square-foot single-family residence and related site improvements at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos within the Hillside Planned Residential zone. Therefore, the Project fits within a Class 3 exemption.
Further, none of the exceptions outlined in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply. The Project will not impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The Project site is not located within a conservation area identified by the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). The Project, consisting of a single-family residence and associated site improvements, will not result in successive projects of the same type in the same place over time that would create a significant cumulative impact on the environment. There will be no cumulative impact resulting from successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. There are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project or Project site that would result in a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment. The residence is proposed on an existing legal residential parcel and is consistent with surrounding residential development and applicable hillside development standards. There will be no damage to scenic resources, including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. The Project is not located on a hazardous waste site or any other site included on a list compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5. The Project site is a vacant parcel and does not contain any designated historical resource. The Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The Project will not result in significant adverse impacts to historical resources as defined by CEQA.
Based on staff’s review, the Project qualifies for the Class 3 exemption, and no further environmental review is required. This qualification will be presented to City Council for final action.
Legal Review
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.
Financial Impact
None.
Attachments
1. Draft Resolution
2. Project Plans
3. Public Hearing Notice
4. Public Comment
403
Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist
Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations.
1. Site-Specific Property Interest
Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the project site: 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2).
2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract?
☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the applicant(s), appellant(s), party, or participant(s): Michael Hanes Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 404
Resolution No. 2026-
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, Approving a Hillside Development Plan for the Construction of a New Single Family Residence at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos and Finding the Project Exempt from Environmental Review in Accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
Case No. PP25-0001
WHEREAS, Michael Hanes (“Applicant”), submitted a Hillside Development Plan (“HDP”), under Precise Plan application No. PP25-0001 to allow the construction of a new one-story, 7,600 square-foot single-family residence located at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos (APN 628-140-008) (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Project site is located within the Hillside Planned Residential (“HPR”) zoning district, and is designated Residential by the Palm Desert General Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed Project conforms to the General Plan land use designation of Residential and development standards listed in the City’s Zoning Ordinance for the HPR zoning district; and
WHEREAS, under Section 21067 of the Public Resources Code, Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), and the City of Palm Desert’s (“City’s”) Local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the lead agency for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Project has complied with the requirements of the "2024 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act for the City of Palm Desert” Resolution No. 2024-035, in that the Director of Development Services has determined that the Project will not have a foreseeable significant impact on the environment and that the Project is eligible for an exemption pursuant to Article 19, Section 15303, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures (Class 3); therefore, no further environmental review is necessary at this time; and
WHEREAS, the Architectural Review Commission (ARC) of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on June 9, 2026, approve a design review for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 7th day of July 2026, hold a duly noticed public hearing and adopted a resolution recommending the City Council approve of the above-noted Project request; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, did on the 20th day of August 2026, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the request by the Applicant for approval of the above-noted Project request; and WHEREAS, at the said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did find the following facts and reasons, which are outlined in the staff report, exist to justify 405
Resolution No. XXXX Page 2
approval of said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. CEQA. The application has complied with the requirements of the “2024 Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act for the City of Palm Desert” Resolution No. 2024-035, in that the City Council find that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15303 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, (“Class 3”).
The City of Palm Desert, in its capacity as Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with CEQA. The Project has been reviewed through the City’s Hillside Development Plan process to evaluate grading, siting, visual impacts, hillside disturbance, and consistency with applicable development standards. In accordance with the State CEQA guidelines, the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – Class 3 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, in that the Project consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small structures. Examples of Class 3 exemptions include single-family residence, second dwelling units, duplexes, and multifamily residential structures totaling no more than four dwelling units. Here, the Project consists of a Hillside Development Plan for the construction of one new 7,600 square-foot single-family residence and related site improvements at 47780 Calle de Los Campesinos within the Hillside Planned Residential zone. Therefore, the Project fits within a Class 3 exemption.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, the City Council finds that none of the exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption apply:
1. Location: The Project site is not located within an environmentally sensitive area where the Project may have a significant adverse impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The Project site is not located within a conservation area identified by the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP).
2. Cumulative Impact: The Project, consisting of a single-family residence and associated site improvements, will not result in successive projects of the same type in the same place over time that would create a significant cumulative impact on the environment.
3. Significant Effect: There are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project or Project site that would result in a reasonable possibility of a significant effect on the environment. The residence is proposed on an existing legal residential parcel and is 406
Resolution No. XXXX Page 3
consistent with surrounding residential development and applicable hillside development standards.
4. Scenic Highways: The Project site is not located within a state-designated scenic highway corridor, and the Project will not damage scenic resources, including trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings, within a designated scenic highway corridor.
5. Hazardous Waste Site: The Project site is not included on any list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and is not identified as a hazardous waste site.
6. Historical Resources: The Project site is a vacant parcel and does not contain any designated historical resource. The Project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.
SECTION 3. Findings on Precise Plan. In approving of this Project, the City Council under Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 25.72.030(E), the following findings are required before granting a Precise Plan:
1. The Precise Plan has been reviewed in consideration of the size and shape of the site and the existing and proposed zoning and land uses of the subject property and surrounding area. Appropriate conditions and restrictions have been imposed, where necessary, to ensure the project provides the same degree of use and enjoyment of the subject property and the same degree of protection for adjoining properties as would be achieved through the standard development regulations of the Palm Desert Municipal Code. As conditioned, the project will not result in substantial depreciation of nearby property values or unreasonable interference with the lawful use and enjoyment of surrounding properties and is consistent with the public peace, health, safety, and general welfare.
2. The proposed Precise Plan, as conditioned, has been designed to avoid substantial adverse impacts on surrounding properties and the community. The project will not substantially depreciate nearby property values, unreasonably interfere with the lawful use and enjoyment of adjacent properties, or endanger the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. Therefore, the findings required for approval of the Precise Plan can be made.
3. A Design Review for the project architecture was reviewed and approved as required by the Architectural Review Commission on June 9, 2026.
SECTION 4. Project Approval. The City Council hereby approves of PP25-0001, subject to the conditions of approval identified in Exhibit A.
SECTION 5. Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are based are located at the City’s office at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
ADOPTED ON ______.
407
Resolution No. XXXX Page 4
EVAN TRUBEE
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ANTHONY J. MEJIA
CITY CLERK
I, Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2026-__ is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert on______, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSED:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Desert, California, on ______________, 2026.
ANTHONY J. MEJIA
CITY CLERK
Exhibit A
408
Resolution No. XXXX Page 5
Conditions of Approval
Case No. PP25-0001 (Precise Plan)
Planning Division:
1. The development of the property shall conform substantially with the approved plans and exhibits on file with the Development Services Department, except as modified by the following conditions. Any variation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to building permit issuance and may require review and approval by the ARC, Planning Commission, and/or City Council.
2. The Applicant agrees that in the event of any administrative, legal, or equitable action instituted by a third party challenging the validity of any of the procedures leading to the adoption of these Project Approvals for the Project, or the Project Approvals themselves, the Developer and City each shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to elect whether or not to defend such action. The Developer, at its sole expense, shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City (including its agents, officers, and employees) from any such action, claim, or proceeding with counsel chosen by the City, subject to the Developer’s approval of counsel, which shall not be unreasonably denied, and at the Developer’s sole expense. If the City is aware of such an action or proceeding, it shall promptly notify the Developer and cooperate in the defense. The Developer, upon such notification, shall deposit with City sufficient funds in the judgment of the City Finance Director to cover the expense of defending such action without any offset or claim against said deposit to assure that the City expends no City funds. If both Parties elect to defend, the Parties hereby agree to affirmatively cooperate in defending said action and to execute a joint defense and confidentiality agreement in order to share and protect the information under the joint defense privilege recognized under applicable law. As part of the cooperation in defending an action, City and Developer shall coordinate their defense in order to make the most efficient use of legal counsel and to share and protect information. Developer and City shall each have sole discretion to terminate its defense at any time. The City shall not settle any third-party litigation of Project approvals without the Developer’s consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed unless the Developer materially breaches this indemnification requirement.
3. The development of the property described herein shall be subject to the restrictions and limitations set forth herein, which are in addition to all municipal ordinances and state and federal statutes now in force, or which hereafter may be in force.
4. All conditions are subject to field verification. The City may withhold building or occupancy permits until compliance with applicable conditions are demonstrated.
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of any use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain permits and/or clearance from the following agencies:
Building & Safety Division
City Fire Marshal
Public Works Department
409
Resolution No. XXXX Page 6
Coachella Valley Water District
Evidence of said permit or clearance from the above agencies shall be presented to the Department of Building & Safety at the time of issuance of a building permit for the use contemplated herewith.
6. Any proposed change to the Precise Plan will require an amendment, which will result in a new public hearing.
Engineering:
1. The following plans are hereby referenced: Preliminary Grading Exhibit prepared by Egan Civil, Inc. on March 16, 2026.
2. It is assumed that all easements shown on the Preliminary Grading Exhibit are accurately depicted and include all easements affecting the subject property. A current Preliminary Title Report (dated within 30 days of technical plan submittal) shall be provided. The Applicant shall obtain written authorization from all affected easement holders for any grading or improvements proposed within an easement or provide evidence that the easement has been relocated, quitclaimed, vacated, abandoned, or is otherwise no longer in effect. Proof shall be submitted to the Land Development Department prior to issuance of the grading permit.
3. The Applicant shall comply with Palm Desert Ordinance No. 843, Section 24.20 Stormwater Management and Discharge Ordinance.
4. Prior to a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare a final grading plan for the site. No grading or other improvements shall be permitted until a final grading plan has been approved by the City Engineer. Grading plans and all grading shall conform to the approved Preliminary Grading Exhibit, the California Building Code, Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Title 27 Grading, and all other relevant laws, rules, and regulations governing grading in the City of Palm Desert. a. The final grading plans shall show and identify all proposed onsite improvements in accordance with the approved preliminary grading exhibit. b. All private improvements shall be kept within private property. Non-standard encroachments into proposed public right-of-way will not be permitted, unless clearly identified on these conditions of approval.
c. The soils report shall be submitted with the precise grading plan. d. The project’s Geotechnical Engineer shall sign the final grading plans. e. The grading plan shall identify all proposed and existing utilities. f. The grading plan shall include an erosion control plan. 410
Resolution No. XXXX Page 7
5. Prior to issuance of the grading permit for the development, the Applicant shall pay all appropriate fees in accordance with the City’s Municipal Code.
6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall submit a PM10 application for review and approval. The Applicant shall comply with all provisions of PDMC Section
24.12 regarding Fugitive Dust Control.
7. Prior to approval of the grading plan, the Applicant shall prepare a detailed final hydrology and hydraulics report for approval of the City Engineer. The report shall include all onsite and tributary drainage areas and demonstrate compliance with the City's stormwater retention requirements.
a. Site is required to handle the 100-year 24-hour event. Final report shall show the site is designed to meet requirement.
b. Design shall incorporate emergency overflow outlet in the event the drainage improvements exceed full capacity.
c. A maximum infiltration rate of 1 inch/hour is allowed to be used for this project per the City of Palm Desert Stormwater Infiltration Rate Policy otherwise as approved by the City Engineer.
8. The applicant shall demonstrate a positive method of conveying overflow from the site to the adjacent Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) channel. Overflow facilities shall be designed to safely convey flows without causing erosion or impacts to adjacent properties. Prior to grading permit issuance, the applicant shall obtain all required approvals, permits, and a recorded discharge agreement or other written authorization from the Coachella Valley Water District for any proposed discharge to the CVWD facility. Copies of the executed agreement(s) shall be submitted to the City.
9. Prior to grading permit issuance it shall be the sole responsibility of the Applicant to obtain any and all proposed or required easements and/or permissions necessary to perform the grading shown on the preliminary site plan exhibit. Proof shall be provided to the Land Development Department prior to issuance of grading permit.
10. Prior to issuance of grading permit, where grading involves import or export, the Applicant shall obtain relevant permits, from the Public Works Department where the material is coming from or going to, including import/export quantities and hauling route.
11. Prior to grading permit sign-off, the final grade certification shall be submitted in conformance with the approved grading plans. The Engineer of Record shall certify the completion of grading in conformance with the lines and grades shown on the approved grading plans.
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
PAVEMENT
EDGE OFEX.
SIDEWALKCONCRETEEX.
TREEEX.
TREEEX.
TREESEX.
(610)
(620)
(625)
(627)
(623)
(543)
(544)
(545)
(546)
(548)
(547)
(550)
(549)
(551)
(552)
(553)
(554)
(556)
(555)
(559)
(558)
(557)
(560)
(561)
(564)
(565)
(567)
(575)
(573)
(567)
(570)
(577)
(577) (576) (575)
(574)
(574)
(573)
(572)
(571)
(572)
(570)
(580) (572)
(625)
(624)
(623) (622)
(586)
(586)
(586)
(543)
(544) (544)
(562)
(559)
(560)
(561)
(562)
(563)
(565)
(572)
(571)
(570)
(569)
(568)
(567)
(566)
(565)
(564)
(563)
(562)
(561)
(560)
(565)
(564)
(563)
(562) (561)
(566)
(565)
(564)
(563) (562)
(562)
(562)
(563)
(560)
(559)
(556)
(557)
(556)
(555)
(554)
(552)
(553)
(550)
(551)
(545) (544)
(545)
(555)
(555)
(554)
(554)
(553)
(556)
(557)
(557)
(557)
(557)
(615)
(610)
(605)
(600)
(595)
(590)
(575)
(570)
(565)
(560)
(555)
(550)
(545)
(560)
(580)
(560)
(565)
(570)
(575)
(580)
(585)
(590)
(595)
(600)
(605)
(575)
(570)
(565)
(560)
(555)
(560)
(565)
(570)
(575)
(580)
(585)
(585)
(585)
(573)
(558)
(558)
(559)
(559)
(559)
(558)
(558)
(556)
(543)
FENCE WOODEX.
FENCE WOODEX.
PAVEMENTEDGE OFEX.
PAVEMENTEDGE OFEX.
PAVEMENTEDGE OFEX.
PAVEMENTEDGE OFEX.
PARCEL
3 2.80 ACRES
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS
2.80 AC.
PARCEL 3
C
C
C
N 89°30'58" E
10.00'
10.00'
20'
10'
192571, O.R.
INST. NO.
REC. 3/28/92PER DEED
PARTNOT A
12'
10'
2.00'
ELEC. LINES E.A.
2.00'
ACCESS
EASEMENT
N89°49'16"W 280.99'
N00°20'00"W 584.66'
1 2
3 4
5 6
558.90FS
558.90FS
559.00FS
558.65FS
558.85FS
558.86FS
558.95FS
-1.67%
559.00FS
559.00FS
558.95FS
-7.7%
559.00FS
558.80FS
-8.8%
555.13FS
559.50TW
-7.8%
547.50FS
551.90FS
551.60FS
HOUSE
4,000 SF LIVING-MAIN LEVEL
FF = 559.00
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
PAD = 558.5
POOL EQP.
5' BLOCK WALL
5' BLOCK WALL
GARDEN WALL
-15%
MOTORCOURT
60'
POOL
COPING=559.00
W
W
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
M
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING ROAD
RETENTION
BTM: 556.0 BASIN
566.00TW
564.00TW
566.00TW 564.00TW
RETAINING WALLS
RETAINING WALLS
555.5FG
ROCK-LINED
CHANNEL
-7.7%
558
557
553
552
551
550
549
548
554
558
559
558
555
552
553
554
558
558
557
557
557
551
557
558
558
558
558
553
552
551
EXISTING
WATER MAIN
557
556
557
556
558
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
561.00FG 559.00FG
561.00FG
558.80FG
553.35FS
553.95FS
555
554
559.50TW
558.50FG
558.50FG
RETAINING WALLS
-2.0%
-3.2%
555.00FS
HP/GB
PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY
555
-5.9%
558.50FG
558.90FS
558.85FS
558.85FS
-2%
-2%
-2%
-2%
-2%
558.85FS
-2%
WS EL=558.50
558.80FS
558.95FS SWALE @ 0.5% MIN.
-1.8%
564.00TW
559.00FG
558.70FS
561.00TW
556.0FG
560.50TW
561.50TW
560.50TW
555.34FS 556.00TW
551.0FG
556
560.00TW
555.0FG
557.00TW
552.0FG
559.00TW
554.00FS
559.00TW
554.00FS
564.00TW
558.00FS
564.00TW
558.00FS
562.00TW
556.00FS
556
562.00TW
557.0FG
563.00TW
558.0FG
SEE ARCH. PLANS
SEE ARCH. PLANS
SEE ARCH. PLANS
1 60 30 60 120 180
SCALE: 1"=20'
0 SCALE: 1"=20
SARGSYAN RESIDENCE
PRELIMINARY SITE & GRADING PLAN
47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS PALM DESERT, CA 92260
IN THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT DATA
A PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISED OF MAIN LIVING AREA OF 4000 S.F, LOWER LEVEL LIVING AREA OF 345 S.F., COVERED PATIOS (MAIN LEVEL) OF 900 S.F. MECHANICAL STORAGE (LOWER LEVEL) OF 300 S.F. AND GARAGE (LOWER LEVEL) OF 300 S.F.
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS
PALM DESERT, CA 92260
PROPERTY AREA: 121,968 S.F./ 2.80 ACRES
BUILDING DISTURBED AREA: 9,750 S.F./ 0.22 ACRES
DRIVEWAY DISTURBED AREA: 2,500 S.F./ 0.06 ACRES
EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ESTIMATE:
CUT = 1,700 C.Y.
FILL = 1,100 C.Y.
NET = 600 C.Y. EXPORT
APN AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
628-140-008
PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 31056
MAP BOOK 209, PAGE 65
ZONING
H.P.R. - HILLSIDE PLANNED RESIDENTIIAL
PREPARED FOR:
HENRIK SARGSYAN
4062 VERDUGO ROAD
LOS ANGELES, CA 90065
[email protected]
EL PASEO
SAN
PABLO
FRED WARING DR
DESERT
PALM
74 CITY
CATHEDRAL
THOUSAND
PALMS RD DR ST COOK
RAMON HOPE
GERALD FORD
DR
MONTEREY
PORTOLA
CLUB
BOB
HOVELY LN
COUNTRY
ELDORADO
AVE
DR DATE PALM
FRANK SINATRA
MIRAGE
RANCHO
111
LA
ST
ST
WASHINGTON
QUINTA JEFFERSON
WELLS
INDIAN
10 DR
42ND AVE
INDIO
111
SHADOW
HOMESTEAD RD
GRAPEVINE
MESA VIEW
MT. DR.
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
SITE BEL AIR RD
REVISIONS MARK BY DATE
ENGINEER CITY
APPR. DATE
BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R.C.E. NO. 73070
PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF:
DATE:
1 OF
SHEET
CITY FILE NUMBER
SHEETS
CITY OF PALM DESERT
Know what'sbelow.
Call before you dig.
R
NO. 73070
B
ENJA MIN DA NIEL EGA
N
R
E G I S
T
E R E D P R O F E S S IO NA L
E NG I NE E
R
C I V I L
S T A T E O F C A L I F O R NI A
PO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282
EGAN CIVIL, INC.
(760) 404-7663 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COM
TRAFFIC
LANDSCAPE
CIVIL
PLAN CHECKED BY:
PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 31056 (MB 209/065-066)
47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
BENCHMARK:
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
BENCHMARK: PD BM #141
ELEVATION: 185.78 DATUM: NAVD 88
DESCRIPTION: 2" BRASS DISK IN CURB OF RIDGE VIEW WAY ISLAND AT PCC STATION 16+78.86 AS SHOWN ON CITY OF PALM DESRT STREET & STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR IRONWOOD COUNTRY CLUB TRACT NO. 29713, SHEET 8 OF 17 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF LA PALM DESRT AS PLAN NUMBER E-875-8.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF RIDGE VIEW WAY OF TRACT NO 29713, AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 349, PAGES 12 THROUGH 22
INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING: NORTH 39°26'02" WEST.
R.C.E. 44226, EXP. 6/30/2025
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DATE
DATE
CONTRACTED CITY ENGINEER MICHAEL THORNTON, P.E. SARGSYAN RESIDENCE
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
PLOT DATE: MARCH 16, 2026
AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY PER DEED RECORDED MAY 9, 1958 IN BOOK 2268 PAGE 467, O.R.
AN EASEMENT FOR ELECTRIC LINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GEORGE M. & ANNE M. ERICKSON PER DEED RECORDED MARCH 18, 1954 IN BOOK PAGE 259, O.R.
THE CENTERLINE OF AN EASEMENT 25 FT IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY, INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF EUGENE L. & JEANNE L. CONROTTO, THE MARIAN IHRIG LIVING TRUST ANS THE VIK FAMILY 1993 TRUST PER DEED RECORDED MAY 15, 2002 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2002-256355, O.R.
AN EASEMENT FOR PIPELINE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PER DEED RECORDED JUNE 7, 1965 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 65567, O.R.
AN EASEMENT 12 FT IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY, INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF JOSEPH W. & MOLLIE S. PENDERGAST PER DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 130856, O.R.
AN EASEMENT 12 FT IN WIDTH FOR ROADWAY, INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF JANE PELGRAM PER DEED RECORDED JANUARY 4, 1968, AS INSTRUMENT NO, 1046, O.R.
EASEMENT NOTES:
1 2
3 4
5 6
NOTE: ALL STRUCTURES LOCATED ON SLOPES WITH A GRADE OF 20% OR LESS.
NOTE: DEVELOPMENT CLUSTERED WITHIN LOWER SLOPE PORTION OF SITE. 3/16/2026
432
(626)
(622)
(624)
(616)
(613)
(610)
(604)
(602)
(599)
(597)
(594)
(592)
(591)
(583)
(585)
(590)
(564)
(562)
(559)
(618)
(620)
(625)
(627)
(627)
(623)
(542)
(543)
(544)
(545)
(546)
(548)
(547)
(550)
(549)
(551)
(552)
(553)
(554)
(556)
(555)
(559)
(558)
(557)
(560)
(561)
(564)
(565)
(567)
(575)
(573)
(567)
(570)
(577)
(577)
(576)
(575)
(574)
(574)
(573)
(572)
(571)
(572)
(570)
(570)
(575)
(580)
(572)
(572)
(565)
(560)
(560)
)
05)
(615)
620)
(625)
(626)
(625) (624)
(624)
(623)
(622)
(622)
(586)
(586)
(586)
(542)
(543)
(544)
(544)
(562)
(559)
(560)
(561)
(562)
(563)
(565)
(573)
(572)
(571)
(570)
(569)
(568)
(567)
(566)
(565)
(564)
(563)
(562)
(561)
(560)
(565)
(564)
(563)
(562)
(561)
(566)
(565)
(564)
(563)
(562)
(562)
(562)
(563)
(560)
(559)
(556)
(557)
(556)
(555)
(554)
(552)
(553)
(550)
(551)
(545)
(544)
(545)
(555)
(555)
(554)
(554)
(553)
(556)
(557)
(557)
(557)
(557)
(559)
(561)
(562)
(566)
(564)
(573)
(615)
(610)
(605)
(600)
(595)
(590)
(575)
(570)
(565)
(560)
(555)
(550)
(545)
(560)
(580)
(560)
(565)
(570)
(575)
(580)
(585)
(590)
(595)
(600)
(605)
(575)
(570)
(565)
(560)
(555)
(560)
(565)
(570)
(575)
(580)
(585)
(585)
(585)
(573)
(558)
(558)
(559)
(559)
(559)
(558)
(558)
(556)
(543)
PARCEL 2
CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS
2.80 AC.
PARCEL 3
C
C
C
N 89°30'58" E
10.00'
20'
10'
192571, O.R.
INST. NO.
REC. 3/28/92
PER DEED
PART
NOT A
12'
10'
2.00'
ACCESS EASEMENT
N89°49'16"W 280.99'
N00°20'00"W 584.66'
1 2
3 4
5 6
-1.67%
-7.7%
-8.8%
-1.0%
-7.8%
HOUSE
4,000 SF LIVING-MAIN LEVEL
FF = 559.00
S S S S S S S
PAD = 558.5
-15%
60'
POOL
WS EL=558.50
S S S S
M
RETENTION
BTM: 556.0
BASIN
-7.7%
EXCEEDS 35%
30% to 35%
25% to 30%20% to 25%
15% to 20%10% to 15%
0% to 10%
SLOPE RANGE (%) COLOR
SLOPE TABLE FOR EXISTING SURFACE
SLOPE STUDY EXHIBIT
SITE BEL AIR RD
NOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
MT. DR.
MESA VIEW
GRAPEVINE
HOMESTEAD RD
SHADOW
111
INDIO
42ND AVE
DR
10 INDIAN
WELLS
JEFFERSON
QUINTA
WASHINGTON ST
ST
LA
111
RANCHO
MIRAGE
FRANK SINATRA
DATE PALM DR
AVE
ELDORADO COUNTRY
BOB HOVELY LN
CLUB
PORTOLA
MONTEREY
DR
GERALD FORD
HOPE
RAMON
COOK ST
DR
RD PALMS
THOUSAND
CATHEDRAL
CITY
74 PALM
DESERT
SAN
PABLO FRED WARING DR
EL PASEO
PREPARED FOR:ZONINGAPN AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONPROJECT DATAPROJECT DESCRIPTION SCALE: 1"=20
60 30 60 120 180
SCALE: 1"=20'
0 1
REVISIONS
MARK BY DATE
ENGINEER CITY
APPR. DATE
BENJAMIN DANIEL EGAN, R.C.E. NO. 73070
PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF:
DATE:
1 OF
SHEET
CITY FILE NUMBER
SHEETS
CITY OF PALM DESERT
Know what'sbelow.
Call before you dig.
R PO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282
EGAN CIVIL, INC.
(760) 404-7663 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COM
TRAFFICLANDSCAPECIVIL
PLAN CHECKED BY:
PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 31056 (MB 209/065-066)
47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260
BENCHMARK:
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
BENCHMARK: PD BM #141ELEVATION: 185.78 DATUM: NAVD 88DESCRIPTION: 2" BRASS DISK IN CURB OF RIDGE VIEW WAY ISLAND AT PCC STATION 16+78.86 AS SHOWN ON CITY OF PALM DESRT STREET & STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR IRONWOOD COUNTRY CLUB TRACT NO. 29713, SHEET 8 OF 17 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF LA PALM DESRT AS PLAN NUMBER E-875-8.
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF RIDGE VIEW WAY OF TRACT NO 29713, AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 349, PAGES 12 THROUGH 22 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OFCALIFORNIA, BEING: NORTH 39°26'02" WEST.
R.C.E. 44226, EXP. 6/30/2025
REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY:
APPROVED BY:
CITY OF PALM DESERT
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
DATEDATE
CONTRACTED CITY ENGINEERMICHAEL THORNTON, P.E. Z:\PDATA\20221007\CADD\MST\Palm Desert Logo.jpg SARGSYAN RESIDENCE
SARGSYAN RESIDENCE
NO. 73070
BENJA MIN
D
A
NIEL EGA N
R E G I S T E R E D
P R O F E S S IO NA L E NG I NE E R
C I V I L
S T A T E
O F C A
L I F O R NI A
SLOPE STUDY EXHIBIT
47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS
PALM DESERT, CA 92260
PROPOSED
DRIVEWAY
ENTRY
OFFICE /
RETREAT
+0'-0"
LIVING GREAT ROOM
BEDROOM
4 BEDROOM
3 LAUNDRY
BEDROOM
2 BATH
4 BATH
3 BATH
2 9
8 7
6 5
4 3
2 1
0 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 9
-5'-6"
PRIMARY
BATH
PRIMARY
CLOSET
PRIMARY
SUITE
DINING
POWDER
BUTLER
PANTRY
ART
ART
ART
K
I
T
C
H
E
N
+0'-0"
ENTRY
WALK
BBQ
DRIVEWAY
ACAC
+36
-6
-12
-18
-24
AC AC
FIRE TROUGH SPA
LOUNGE
-30" SUNKEN
BUILT-IN SEATING
LOWER TROUGH
INFINITY EDGE
-18"
GLASS WALL
+0
+42
+36
BAR / BBQ
POOL EQUIP
POOL
WATER
FEATURE
BENCH
STEPS
ENTRY
WALK
-30
+9'
WATERWALL WATER FEATURE
-66"
DEPTH
STEP STEP
BENCH
-42"
DEPTH
5' TALL
GATE
5' TALL
GATE
5' TALL
GATE
PARCEL
3 2.80 ACRES
-11'-6"
MOTORCOURT
EXISTING
PAVED
ROAD
EXISTING
PAVED
ROAD
EXISTING
PAVED
ROAD
EXISTING
PAVED
ROAD
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
+5' TALL
IRON
FENCE
-6'
-5.5'
-6' -6'
+0'+0'
-2'
-4' -4'
-2' +0' +0'
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
+4' TALL
BLOCK
WALL
-9"
DEPTH
-18"
DEPTH
SLOPE
PROPERTY LINE 559.00FS 559.00FS
559.00FS
558.90FS
558.90FS 558.90FS
558.86FS
558.75FS
559.00FS
559.00FS
558.95FS
559.00FS
559.00FS
555.13FS
555.34FS
547.50FS
551.90FS
551.60FS
POOL EQP.
5' BLOCK WALL
5' BLOCK WALL
RETAINING WALL
MOTORCOURT
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING ROAD
566.00TW
564.00TW
566.00TW 564.00TW
RETAINING WALLS
RETAINING WALLS
555.50FG
ROCK-LINED
CHANNEL
EXISTING WATER MAIN
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
DAYLIGHT LINE
561.00FG 559.00FG
561.00FG
558.80FG
HENRIK SARGSYAN4062 VERDUGO ROADLOS ANGELES, CA [email protected]. - HILLSIDE PLANNED RESIDENTIIAL628-140-008PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP 31056MAP BOOK 209, PAGE 65PROPERTY ADDRESS: 47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS PALM DESERT, CA 92260
PROPERTY AREA: 121,968 S.F./ 2.8 ACRESA PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISED OF MAIN LIVING AREAOF 4000 S.F, LOWER LEVEL LIVING AREA OF 345 S.F., COVERED PATIOS (MAIN LEVEL) OF 900 S.F. MECHANICAL STORAGE (LOWER LEVEL) OF 300 S.F. AND GARAGE (LOWER LEVEL) OF 300 S.F.
559.50TW
DAYLIGHT LINE
553.35FS
553.95FS
559.50TW558.50FG
559.00FG
RETAINING WALLS
555.00FS
HP/GB
PLOT DATE: MARCH 16, 2026
NOTE: RESIDENCE FOOTPRINT LOCATED WIHTIN
0-15% SLOPE AREA, NO STRUCTURES ONSLOPES EXCEEDING 20%. 3/16/2026
433
Δ Δ Aerial Topographic Map Aerial Topographic Map1 Know what'sbelow. Callbefore you dig. R R:\AutoCAD\Projects\364S-001 Sargsyan\dwg\364s-001tp01.dwg, TP01, 7/26/2023 12:43:02 PM 434
C I T Y O F P A L M
D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578
TEL: 760-346-0611
[email protected]
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CASE NO. PP25-0001
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO REVIEW A REQUEST BY MICHAEL HANES FOR APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 7,600 SQUARE-FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS IN THE HILLSIDE PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL ZONE
The proposed project has been reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Staff has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 3 Categorical Exemption (Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). If approved, the City Council will consider finding the project exempt from CEQA and directing the filing of a Notice of Exemption..
PROJECT LOCATION: 47780 CALLE DE LOS CAMPESINOS, PALM DESERT, CA 92260 (APN 628-140- 008)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Consideration to approve a Hillside Development Plan (HDP) to construct a new 7,600 square-foot single-family residence at 47780 Calle De Los Campesinos in the Hillside Planned Residential (HPR) zone.
PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Commission of the City of Palm Desert, California, at a public hearing on July 7, 2026, adopted a resolution recommending the City Council approve the project request.
PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, will hold a Public Hearing at its meeting on August 20, 2026. The City Council meeting begins at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California. Pursuant to Senate Bill 707, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person.
Options for remote participation will be listed on the Posted Agenda for the meeting at https://www.palmdesert.gov/government/meetings
COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Those wishing to comment on this application may either appear in person at the public hearing or submit written comments, which must be received by 10:00 a.m. on the day of the hearing. Written comments should be sent to the City of Palm Desert at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260, Attention: City Clerk, or emailed to:
Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. [Government Code Section 65009(b)(2)].
Si necesita ayuda con esta notificación por favor llame a la Ciudad de Palm Desert y comuníquese con Damian Olivares (760) 346-0611.
PUBLISH: THE DESERT SUN ANTHONY J. MEJIA, MMC, CITY CLERK AUGUST 7, 2026 CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
435
436
From: David Toltzmann
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2026 12:49 PM
To: Siji Fernandez <[email protected]>
Subject: Public hearing on 47780 Calle De Los Campesinos Hi there,
Was planning on attending this meeting in person, but my schedule changed.
I do have concerns on this property being developed.
My biggest concerns are:
Even though we have a ban on STRs in Palm Desert, they still operate.
Even though we have strong fines, they still opperate.
Even though we have nighttime Code Enforcemen, they still operate.
I would hate to see a hillside hotel operating with its noise and light pollution.
Noise travels differently on an alluvial fan, than on flat land. We all know that with dealing with STRs.
One of the biggest lies I have ever been told to my face is, "The family is spending so much money on the interior finishes, they would never allow renters." Then as soon as construction is finished its rented on weekends.
Parties, DJs, noise, parking issues...
I'm not saying these people are dishonest, but things can be said to push a project thru.
My fear is this will happen again. It won't effect me directly, but the adjacent neighbors will suffer. The building pads can be close together on the hillside.
In the past I have been told that Code Enforcement has no authority in Cahuilla Hills on noise violations after 10pm. Is that true?
I think measures need to be taken to not overlook these possibilities.
Thank you,
David Toltzmann
437
438
City of Palm Desert Staff Report
Meeting Date: August 20, 2026
Prepared By: Carlos Flores, AICP, Deputy Director of Development Services Department: Development Services
Subject: Designation of an Existing Single-Family Home Located at 73411 Bursera Way as a Historic Landmark Pursuant to Criteria C and F of Palm Desert Municipal Code Section
29.40.010
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert Designating an Existing Single Family House at 73411 Bursera Way as a Historic Landmark Pursuant to Criteria C and F in Palm Desert Municipal Code Section 29.40.010 and Finding Said Action Is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15038 (Assessor’s Parcel Number 630-081-018)” Executive Summary
This application is an owner-initiated request to designate the single-family residence located at 73411 Bursera Way as a historic landmark pursuant to Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) Section 29.40.010. The residence was constructed in 1957-1958 by Roberts Construction Co., according to the applicant's records, during Palm Desert's formative postwar period, and is described in the applicant's materials as a Mid-Century Modern residence.
Staff evaluated the property using the application materials, current photographs, the City's Historic Context Statement, the City’s Historic Resources Survey, and the landmark designation criteria and found the property eligible under Criterion C as an example of Desert Modern architecture and under Criterion F for reflecting Palm Desert's significant postwar residential development patterns.
On June 24, 2026, the Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) reviewed the application and recommended that the City Council approve the landmark designation. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution designating the property as a landmark.
Background
The subject property is a single-story single-family residence located at 73411 Bursera Way (APN 630-081-018). According to the applicant's submitted description, the residence was constructed in 1957-1958 by Roberts Construction Co. and embodies the climate-responsive modernism characteristic of early Palm Desert residential architecture.
In April 2025, the City accepted the Historic Context Statement and Citywide Historic Resources Survey, which provides a framework for evaluating potential historic resources in Palm Desert.
The Historic Context Statement identifies the years 1957-1966 as the period of Palm Desert's “Diversified Development,” following liquidation of the Palm Desert Corporation (PDC) in 1956. 439
During this period, new developers and builders played a larger role in shaping Palm Desert, residential development expanded rapidly, and Modernism continued to dominate the built environment.
The Historic Context Statement notes that residential development in this era included new subdivisions, speculative construction, infill development on streets previously platted but not developed by the PDC, and a broader diversification of Palm Desert's housing types and residents. The Bursera Way area is part of this broader post-PDC pattern of residential infill and development.
Analysis
Staff finds that the property meets the following landmark designation criteria in PDMC Section
29.40.010:
Criterion C: Embodies distinctive characteristics or is one of the few remaining examples of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or possesses high artistic value. Criterion F: Reflects distinctive examples of community planning or significant development patterns, including those associated with different eras of settlement and growth, agriculture, or transportation.
Criterion C – Architectural Significance
The residence meets Criterion C as a substantially intact example of Mid-Century Modern (Desert Modern) residential architecture adapted to the Coachella Valley climate. The property exhibits the core design vocabulary associated with Palm Desert's postwar modern residential architecture, including low horizontal massing, simple geometric forms, a flat roof, shaded overhangs and roof projections, clerestory/transom windows, aluminum-framed sliding-glass walls, floor-to-ceiling glazing, and an architectural composition that integrates interior living spaces with patios, courtyard areas, and the rear pool environment.
The Historic Context Statement identifies Mid-Century Modern architecture as the predominant postwar architectural style in Palm Desert. The residence reflects many of its defining characteristics, including horizontal massing, flat roof forms, broad glazing, integrated stone veneer, shaded outdoor living areas, and a strong indoor-outdoor relationship, making it a representative example of Desert Modern residential architecture.
Criterion F – Development Pattern Significance
The property also meets Criterion F because it reflects significant development patterns associated with Palm Desert's postwar growth and the community's transition after liquidation of the PDC in 1956. The Historic Context Statement identifies 1957-1966 as a period of diversified development, during which new developers and builders expanded residential construction throughout Palm Desert.
The residence was constructed in 1957-1958, at the outset of this development period, and is representative of the residential development patterns identified in the Historic Context Statement. The property reflects not only an architectural style, but also the postwar residential development patterns identified in the Historic Context Statement. 440
Integrity
PDMC Chapter 29.20 defines integrity as the ability of a cultural resource to convey its significance, requiring retention of most of the aspects that closely relate to that significance, including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Staff finds that 73411 Bursera Way retains sufficient integrity to convey its significance under Criteria C and F. The residence retains its original location, overall massing, roofline, clerestory/transom glazing pattern, relationship to outdoor living spaces, low-scale residential setting, substantial historic materials, and association with Palm Desert's postwar residential development period.
The Historic Context Statement notes that residential properties from this period should retain integrity of location, feeling, and association at a minimum, and that a property that has lost some historic materials or details may still be eligible if it retains the majority of features illustrating its original style and appearance, including massing, spatial relationships, proportion, and fenestration pattern. Based on the submitted photographs and applicant materials, the subject property retains these essential physical features.
Historic Preservation Committee recommendation
On June 24, 2026, the Historic Preservation Committee held a noticed public hearing to consider the application under Case No. CRPC-26-0008. The HPC reviewed the application materials, the City's Historic Context Statement and Citywide Historic Resources Survey, and current photographs, and found that the property retains sufficient integrity and satisfies Criteria C and F of PDMC Section 29.40.010. No public comments were received. The HPC recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution designating 73411 Bursera Way as a landmark.
Environmental Review
The proposed landmark designation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15308, Class 8. The designation is a regulatory action intended to protect a historic resource and does not authorize construction, demolition, alteration, or any other physical change to the property. None of the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2 applies.
Legal Review
This report has been reviewed by the City Attorney’s Office.
Financial Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Attachments
1. Draft City Council Resolution
2. Application
3. Photographs Dated May 05, 2026
4. Public Hearing Notice
441
Conflict of Interest Awareness Checklist
Note: This checklist is informational only and does not constitute a legal determination. Each Councilmember remains responsible for identifying, disclosing, and evaluating any disqualifying interests under the Political Reform Act and applicable FPPC regulations.
1. Site-Specific Property Interest
Does this item involve a project site or other identifiable real property? ☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the project site: 73411 Bursera Way
Councilmembers should consider whether they own, lease, or hold interests in real property within 1,000 feet of the project site. (Gov. Code § 87103(b); FPPC Reg. 18702.2).
2. SB 1439 / Gov. Code § 84308 Applicability (Campaign Contributions) Does this item involve a license, permit, other entitlement for use, or a contract or franchise agreement that is not competitively bid, a labor agreement, or a personal employment contract?
☒ Yes
☐ No
If yes, identify the applicant(s), appellant(s), party, or participant(s): Alan Sereboff Councilmembers should review campaign contributions received within the prior 12 months from parties or participants to the proceeding and must not accept contributions over $500 from those parties for 12 months following the final decision. (Gov. Code § 84308). 442
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT DESIGNATING AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE AT 73411 BURSERA
WAY AS A HISTORIC LANDMARK PURSUANT TO CRITERIA C AND F IN PALM DESERT MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 29.40.010 AND FINDING SAID
ACTION CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA
GUIDELINES, SECTION 15308 (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 630-081- 018)
Case No. CRPC- 26-0008
WHEREAS, Chapter 29.40 of the Palm Desert Municipal Code (PDMC) allows for the designation of historic landmarks by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Alan Sereboff (“Owner/Applicant”) filed an application, including a statement of significance, with the City pursuant to the requirements of Title 29 of the PDMC to designate the existing single-family residence located at 73411 Bursera Way (Assessor's Parcel Number 630-081-018) (“Property”) as a local historic landmark, and the Owner/Applicant has submitted written consent to the designation as required by PDMC Section 29.40.010; and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2026, a noticed public hearing of the Palm Desert Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) was held to consider the Historic Designation under case CRPC-26-0008 and after reviewing the application materials and considering all public testimony and comments provided prior to and during the meeting, recommended that the City Council designate the Property as a landmark, making the following findings pursuant to PDMC Section 29.40.010:
1. Criterion C: Embodies distinctive characteristics, or is one of the few remaining examples of a style, type, period, or method of construction, or possesses high artistic value.
The Property is a substantially intact example of Mid-Century Modern (Desert Modern) residential architecture, constructed in 1957-1958 by Roberts Construction Co. The residence exhibits low horizontal massing, a flat roof with shaded overhangs and projections, clerestory/transom windows, aluminum-framed sliding-glass walls, floorto-ceiling glazing, stone veneer accent walls, and white stucco wall planes, integrated with patios, courtyard areas, and the rear pool environment, collectively conveying the climate-responsive and indoor-outdoor design principles central to Mid-Century desert residential architecture.
443
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
2 2. Criterion F: Reflects distinctive examples of community planning or significant development patterns, including those associated with different eras of settlement and growth, agriculture, or transportation.
The Property reflects significant development patterns associated with Palm Desert's postwar growth and the community's transition following the 1956 liquidation of the Palm Desert Corporation (PDC). Constructed in 1957-1958, at the outset of the City's 1957-1966 “Diversified Development” period identified in the Historic Context Statement, the residence is representative of the new subdivisions, speculative construction, and infill development on previously platted streets that characterized this era, and conveys single-family residential modernism designed for the desert climate, automobile access, and increasingly year-round residential use.
WHEREAS, the HPC further found that the Property retains sufficient integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association to convey its significance under Criteria C and F, as required by PDMC Chapter 29.20; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the HPC's recommendation, the staff report, the application materials, and all testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, as follows:
SECTION 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as substantive findings of this Resolution.
SECTION 2. California Environmental Quality Act. The City Council finds that the landmark designation is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15308, Class 8, and that none of the exceptions set forth in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies.
SECTION 3. Section 29.40.090 of the PDMC requires that the City Council adopt a resolution designating a historic landmark based upon facts and findings on the criteria outlined in Chapter 29.40 Landmarks.
SECTION 4. The custodian of the documents and other materials, which constitute the record of proceedings, shall be the City Clerk. The location of these items is 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, CA 92260.
SECTION 5. Based upon the foregoing findings and facts incorporated herein, the Property, located at 73411 Bursera Way (APN 630-081-018), is hereby designated as a local historic landmark.
ADOPTED ON ______.
444
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-
3 EVAN TRUBEE
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ANTHONY J. MEJIA
CITY CLERK
I, Anthony J. Mejia, City Clerk of the City of Palm Desert, hereby certify that Resolution No. 2026-__ is a full, true, and correct copy, and was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Desert on______, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSED:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Palm Desert, California, on ______________, 2026.
ANTHONY J. MEJIA
CITY CLERK
445
446
447
448
449
v Location details
Address 0
7341 J BURSERA WAY PALM DESERT. CA 92260 <lligb1Dirigtr!MUSW Address ctao4uIooooocoKiK1AX/vjewJ.
Geolocation
33.70841807, -116.38397778
Parcel
630081018 (Llightning/r/MUSW Parcel c/a19UI000003k6bllAA/view).
Street
v Balance Details
Total Fees
Total Payments
Total Balance
$0.00
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
Photographs Dated May 5, 2026
#1 - Primary (North) Elevation
#2 – Primary (North) Elevation Detail
471
#3 - Rear (South) Elevation
#4 - Rear (South) Elevation Detail
472
#5 - Rear (South) Elevation Detail
#6 – Side (East) Elevation Detail
473
#7 – Side (East) Elevation Detail
#8 – Rear (South) Elevation Detail
474
#9 – Side (West) Elevation
#10 – Rear Yard (Southwest Perspective)
475
476
C I T Y O F P A L M
D E S E R T 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA 92260-2578
TEL: 760-776-6483
[email protected]
CITY OF PALM DESERT
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
CASE NO. CRPC-26-0008
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BEFORE THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, TO CONSIDER A LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE 73411 BURSERA WAY The City of Palm Desert (City), in its capacity as the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has determined that the proposed landmark designation is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Guidelines Section 15060(C)(2) and 15060(C)(3) as the project will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a Project as defined by Section 15378.
PROJECT LOCATION: 73411 Bursera Way, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (APN 630-081-018) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is a request by the property owner to designate 73411 Bursera Way as a local landmark. The Historic Preservation Committee, on June 24, 2026, recommended City Council approve the landmark designation.
PUBLIC HEARING: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, will hold a Public Hearing at its meeting on August 20, 2026. The City Council meeting begins at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California.
Pursuant to Senate Bill 707, this meeting may be conducted as a hybrid meeting allowing public access via teleconference or in person. Options for remote participation will be listed on the Posted Agenda for the meeting at https://www.palmdesert.gov/government/meetings COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION: Those wishing to comment on this application may either appear in person at the public hearing or submit written comments, which must be received by 10:00 a.m. on the day of the hearing. Written comments should be sent to the City of Palm Desert at 73510 Fred Waring Drive, Palm Desert, California 92260, Attention: City Clerk, or emailed to:
Any challenge of the proposed project in court may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. [Government Code Section 65009(b)(2)].
Si necesita ayuda con esta notificación por favor llame a la Ciudad de Palm Desert y comuníquese con Damian Olivares (760) 346-0611.
PUBLISH: THE DESERT SUN ANTHONY J. MEJIA, MMC, CITY CLERK AUGUST 7, 2026 CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
477