Cities Index.
Item 9 Staff Report

Palo Alto City Council
June 10, 2024

Document
Item 9 Staff Report
Meeting
June 10, 2024
Body
Palo Alto City Council
Original file
133 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofpaloalto.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

4 4
1 1
City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR
Lead Department: Administrative Services
Meeting Date: June 10, 2024
Report #:2404-2844
TITLE
Adoption of a Resolution Approving Revisions to the City of Palo Alto Energy Risk Management Policy

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution (Attachment A) revising the City of Palo Alto Energy Risk Management Policy (ERMP) (Attachment B).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City’s ERMP is the overriding document for the monitoring, measuring, and controlling risks associated with electric and gas commodity transactions. Proposed changes to this Policy are:

1. Memorializing the Utility Risk Oversight Coordination Committee’s decision to have the City Council receive semi-annual updates from the City Manager regarding energy risk management activities versus quarterly.

BACKGROUND
City of Palo Alto Utilities purchases gas and electricity to serve the energy needs of residents and businesses in the City. An energy risk management policy is necessary because commodity markets are dynamic, commodity purchases are large transaction amounts, and authority to commit the City to these transactions is delegated down to staff.

The ERMP is the overarching document for the management of the City’s risks associated with purchasing electric and gas commodities. In addition to the ERMP, there are two more detailed sets of documents that support it: the Energy Risk Management Guidelines (Guidelines) and the Energy Risk Management Procedures (Procedures). The documents describe key policies and control structures to minimize risks by, for example, ensuring transparent and appropriate purchasing procedures, segregating duties, establishing acceptable risk parameters and limits, and instituting multiple review processes.

4 4
1 1
The Guidelines are more detailed than the ERMP and are reviewed and approved by the Utilities Risk Oversight and Coordinating Committee (UROCC), which consists of the General Manager of Utilities, Director of Administrative Services, Director of Public Works, and a representative from the City Manager’s Office. The Procedures, which cover operational actions, are approved by the General Manager of Utilities and the Administrative Services Director. The ERMP clearly delineates that all of the City’s utility contract transactions, whether carried out under Master Agreements or not, must fully comply with the Municipal Code.

Transactions carried out by the Northern California Power Agency, including scheduling, are covered under a separate Member Services Agreement.

ANALYSIS
Council last approved the ERMP on June 22, 2020 (Staff Report # 9813). The proposed update reflects minor changes needed to align the document with current City of Palo Alto Utilities procurement practices.

Proposed changes to this Policy are:

1. Memorializing the Utility Risk Oversight Coordination Committee’s decision to have the City Council receive semi-annual updates from the City Manager regarding energy risk management activities versus quarterly.

Prior to June 2020, the City utilized services provided by the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA) to more effectively manage the electric utility and lower operating costs. In June 2020 1(CMR ID # 11086), Council approved entering into the Amended and Restated Market Purchase Program (MPP) Agreement to enable the City to utilize NCPA staff and resources for the City’s medium-term electric portfolio planning and resource management functions, functions that were carried out in-house. This authorized NCPA to purchase and sell market power, resource adequacy capacity products, and renewable energy credits on behalf of the City. Contracting with NCPA for these functions has enabled Palo Alto to achieve operational efficiencies and freed up additional staff time to devote to other projects and programs and shifted the risk associated with this to NCPA staff. The purchases and sales made by NCPA on Palo Alto’s behalf under the MPP Agreement conform to NCPA’s Energy Risk Management Policy and Regulations, and to the City’s Energy Risk Management Policies.

To put this into context, the Table 1 below has the three-year actual electric commodity purchases and excess energy sales by megawatt-hour (MWh). Based on the average three-year MWh, 95.5% of electric commodity purchases are under long-term agreements that are not 1 https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/agendas-minutes-reports/reports/city-manager-reports- cmrs/year-archive/2020/id-11086-mini-packet-062220.pdf
4 4
1 1
part of this proposed semi-annual reporting. These agreements have and are approved by the City Council as they are enacted and/or renewed. Of the remaining, 2.5% (Spot Market) net purchases and sales are done by NCPA under their Risk Management Program. Prior to the NCPA MPP Agreement, City staff did these purchases and sales. City Utility staff coordinates with NCPA the amount of MWh purchases and sales needed. A City staff sits as a voting member of their Risk Oversight Committee and attends their Finance Committee to monitor their activities. Around 1.9% of commodity purchases and sales (Forward Market) are done by City staff and is the focus on the proposed semi-annual report.

As a result, based on the above especially because around 1.9% of the commodity purchases and sales are done by City Staff, semi-annual reporting to City Council is recommended. A “redlined” version of the document is included as Attachment B.

FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
Approval of the recommendation will not have a financial impact.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Staff works internally with the UROCC and Utility department for the proposed change.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This Council informational report is not a project under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as defined in CEQA Guidelines, section 15378, because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Table 1: Electric Commodity Purchases and Excess Energy Sales - Megawatt-Hour (MWh) by Calendar Year Resources
Calaveras 46,497 5.7% 63,719 7.5% 232,332 26.9% 114,182 13.5% COBUG 0.0% 3 0.0% 21 0.0% 8 0.0% Landfill 104,441 12.7% 96,930 11.4% 101,912 11.8% 101,094 12.0% Solar 311,975 37.9% 330,752 39.0% 362,488 42.0% 335,072 39.7% Western 208,961 25.4% 96,383 11.4% 275,030 31.9% 193,458 22.9% Wind 121,300 14.7% 39,012 4.6% 29,341 3.4% 63,218 7.5% Sub-Total 793,174 96.4% 626,798 73.9% 1,001,124 116.0% 807,032 95.5% Forward Market (City Staff) (3,136) (0.4%) 64,339 7.6% (12,120) (1.4%) 16,361 1.9% Spot Market (NCPA) 32,666 4.0% 157,404 18.6% (125,614) (14.5%) 21,486 2.5% Sub-Total 29,530 3.6% 221,743 26.1% (137,734) (16.0%) 37,847 4.5% Grand Total 822,705 100.0% 848,541 100.0% 863,390 100.0% 844,879 100.0% Note: negative amounts represent (net) excess energy, typically due to Hydro generation, that are sold.

Three Year Average202320222021
4 4
1 1

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Approving Revisions to the City of Palo Alto Energy Risk Management Policy
Attachment B: Proposed Energy Risk Management Policy with Redline Changes APPROVED BY:

Lauren Lai, Administrative Services Director

← All documents from this meeting