Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Palo Alto City Council
August 5, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
August 5, 2024
Body
Palo Alto City Council
Pages
38
Original file
79.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofpaloalto.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
development
approval process
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that projects that have
the potential to generate 100 or
more diesel truck trips per day or
have 40 or more trucks with
operating diesel-powered TRUs,
and are within 1,000 feet of a
sensitive land use (e.g.,
residential, schools, hospitals,
nursing homes), as measured
from the property line of a
proposed project to the property
line of the nearest sensitive use,
prepare and submit a health risk
assessment (HRA)
As development
applications are
received
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
42 Packet Pg. 229 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONTIORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
6 JUNE 2024
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
Mitigation measures identified in the project-specific
HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the
environmental document and/or incorporated into
the site development plan as a component of a
proposed project.

AIR-3b: To ensure that new industrial and
warehousing projects with the potential to generate
new stationary and mobile sources of air toxics that
exceed the BAAQMD project-level and/or cumulative
significance thresholds for toxic air contaminants
and PM

2.5 listed in the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines
reduce emissions below the BAAQMD thresholds of
significance, amend the City’s CEQA guidelines to
require compliance with BAAQMD requirements.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
development
approval process
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that new industrial and
warehousing projects are
evaluated against BAAQMD
thresholds and comply with
BAAQMD requirements
As development
applications are
received
AIR-3c: The proposed Plan shall include policies to
mitigate potential sources of toxic air contaminants
through siting or other means to reduce human
health risks and meet the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District’s applicable threshold of
significance. Policies shall also require that new
sensitive land use projects (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, parks or playgrounds, and
day care centers) within 1,000 feet of a major
stationary source of TACs and roadways with traffic
volumes over 10,000 vehicles per day consider
potential health risks and incorporate adequate
precautions, such as high-efficiency air filtration, into project design.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
development
approval process
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that new sensitive land
uses are evaluated in
conformance with BAAQMD’s
health risk thresholds.

As development
applications are
received
AIR-4: To reduce odor impacts, the proposed Plan
shall include policies requiring:
 Buffers, mechanical, and other mitigation
methods to avoid creating a nuisance.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
development
approval process
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that new development
provides adequate buffers
and/or incorporates other
methods to avoid creating odor
nuisances.

As development
applications are
received
Biological Resources
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
43 Packet Pg. 230 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN 7
1 Refers to smaller perching birds.

Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
Impact BIO-1: Construction
activities associated with
build out of the NVCAP
could result in the loss of
fertile eggs, nesting raptors
or other migratory birds, or
nest abandonment.

MM BIO-1.1 Construction During Migratory Bird and
Raptor Nesting Season. To the extent feasible,
construction activities shall be scheduled to avoid
the nesting season. If construction activities are
scheduled to take place outside the nesting season,
all impacts to nesting birds protected under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish
and Game Code shall be avoided. The nesting season
for most birds in Santa Clara County extends from
February 1 through August 31.

I
f initial site disturbance activities, including tree,
shrub, or vegetation removal, are to occur during
the bird breeding season (February 1 through August
31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-
construction survey for nesting migratory birds and
raptors. The survey for nesting migratory birds shall
cover the project site itself and the immediate
vicinity of the site, with the survey for nesting
raptors encompassing the site and surrounding lands
within 250 feet, where accessible. The survey shall
occur within seven days prior to the onset of ground
disturbance.

I
f active nests are detected, appropriate
construction-free buffers shall be established. The
buffer sizes shall be determined by the project
biologist based on species, topography, and type of
activity occurring in the vicinity of the nest. Typical buffers are 25 to 50 feet for passerines
1 and up to
250 feet for raptors. The project buffer shall be
monitored periodically by the project biologist to
ensure compliance. After the nesting is completed,
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Prior to the
issuance of any
tree removal or
grading permits
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that the projects either
avoid the nesting season or
conduct pre-construction surveys
for nesting migratory birds.

Prior to the
issuance of any
tree removal or
grading permit
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
44 Packet Pg. 231 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONTIORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
8 JUNE 2024
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
as determined by the biologist, the buffer shall no
longer be required.

Following the conclusion of nesting activity and
removal of the construction buffers, a report shall be
submitted to the City summarizing the results of the
survey including identifying any buffer zones, and
outlining measures implemented to prevent impacts
to nesting birds.

Cultural Resources
Impact CUL-1: Future
projects proposed under the
North Ventura Coordinated
Area Plan could result in the
demolition of historic
buildings, including yet
identified historic resources
as defined in CEQA
Guidelines Section 15064.5.

MM CUL-1.1: Prior to project approval, future
development projects that would demolish a
potential historic resource shall be required to
prepare a Historic Resource Evaluation (HRE) to
evaluate whether the property is eligible for
inclusion into the City’s Historic Resources Inventory, CRHR, and NRHP. The HRE shall address the
feasibility of avoiding adverse impacts through
project redesign, rehabilitation, or reuse of the
resource. Preservation in place is always the
preferred measure for mitigating direct impacts to
historic resources. If the resource is to be preserved
on the property, specific measures to protect the
integrity of the structure and its setting shall be
identified.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
development
approval process
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that projects that would
demolish a potential historic
resource prepare and submit a
Historic Resource Evaluation
(HRE)
Prior to project
approval
MM CUL-1.2: If impacts to the historic resource
cannot be avoided, all feasible measures are
required to be implemented to reduce the
magnitude of the impact. At a minimum, the City
shall require “Documentation” and
“Commemoration” efforts in accordance with the
guidelines established for Historic American Building
Survey (HABS) consistent with the Secretary of
Interior’s Standards for Architectural and
Engineering Documentation. Additional measures
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
“Documentation”
to be provided
prior to issuance
of demo permits;
“Commemoratio
n” to be provided
prior to issuance
of occupancy
permits.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
If impacts to historic resources
cannot be avoided, ensure that
“Documentation” and
“Commemoration” efforts are
done in accordance with the
guidelines established for Historic
American Building Survey (HABS)
consistent with the Secretary of
Interior’s Standards for
Architectural and Engineering
Documentation.

Prior to project
approval
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
45 Packet Pg. 232 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN 9
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
could include relocation, incorporation of the
resources into the project, and/or salvage. The
documentation shall be completed by a qualified
architectural historian or historian who meets the
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification
Standards for History and/or Architectural History.

Noise
Impact NOI-1: Construction
activities associated with
build out of the NVCAP
could generate groundborne
vibration capable of causing
cosmetic or worse building
damage or adversely
affecting nearby sensitive
receptors.

MM NOI-1.1: Applicants for projects within the
North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan area shall
obtain a groundborne vibration study prior to the
issuance of any discretionary permits that would
allow the use of construction equipment within 22
feet or pile driving within 101 feet of existing
structures. The study shall be prepared by a qualified
professional in accordance with industry-accepted
methodology, which include the recommended
vibration assessment procedure and thresholds
provided by public agencies such as Caltrans and the
Federal Highway Administration. The study should
identify necessary construction vibration controls to
reduce both human annoyance and the possibility of
cosmetic damage. Controls shall include, but not be
limited to, the following measures:
• A list of all heavy construction equipment
to be used for this project known to
produce high vibration levels (tracked
vehicles, vibratory compaction,
jackhammers, hoe rams, etc.) shall be
submitted to the City by the contractor.

This list shall be used to identify
equipment and activities that would
potentially generate substantial vibration
and to define the level of effort for
reducing vibration levels below the
thresholds.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Prior to the
issuance of
discretionary
permits for
construction
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that projects prepare and
submit a groundborne vibration
study by a qualified professional
Prior to project
approval
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
46 Packet Pg. 233 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONTIORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
10 JUNE 2024
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
• Place operating equipment on the
c
onstruction site as far as possible from
vibration-sensitive receptors.
• Use smaller equipment to minimize
vibration levels below the limits.
• Avoid using vibratory rollers and tampers
near sensitive areas.
• Select demolition methods not involving
impact tools.
• Modify/design or identify alternative
construction methods to reduce vibration
levels below the limits.
• Avoid dropping heavy objects or materials.

Tribal Cultural Resources
Impact TCR-1: Future
projects proposed under the
North Ventura Coordinated
Area Plan could potentially
result in impacts to
undiscovered tribal cultural
resources.

MM TCR-1.1: Cultural Sensitivity Training. Prior to
issuance of any grading permit, the project applicant
shall be required to submit evidence that a Cultural
Awareness Training program has been provided to
construction personnel. The training shall be
facilitated by a qualified archaeologist in
collaboration with a Native American representative
registered with the Native American Heritage
Commission for the City of Palo Alto and that is
traditionally and culturally affiliated with the
geographic area as described in Public Resources
Code Section 21080.3.

City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Prior to the
issuance of any
grading permit
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that projects submit
evidence that a Cultural
Awareness Training program has
been provided to construction
personnel.

Prior to issuance
of any grading
permit
MM TCR-1.2: Sub-Surface Monitoring. Prior to
issuance of any tree removal, grading, demolition,
and/or building permits or activities, the applicant
shall notify the Director of Planning, of grading and
construction dates and activities that require a
qualified archeologist and Native American monitor
to be present on the project site. The City shall then
notify the tribe via email correspondence 10 days
prior to any grading or construction activities. If the City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Prior to the
issuance of any
tree removal,
grading,
demolition,
and/or building
permits or
activities
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that projects incorporate
a qualified archaeologist and
Native American monitor to be
present during earthmoving
activities including, trenching,
initial or full grading, scraping or
blading, lifting of foundation,
boring, drilling, or major
landscaping.

Prior to issuance
of any grading
permit
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
47 Packet Pg. 234 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN 11
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
tribe chooses not to send a monitor or does not
respond within the 10 days, work shall continue
without the monitor.

A qualified archaeologist and a Native American
monitor, registered with the Native American
Heritage Commission for the City of Palo Alto and
that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area as described in Public Resources
Code Section 21080.3, shall be present during
earthmoving activities including, trenching, initial or full grading, scraping or blading, lifting of foundation, boring, drilling, or major landscaping. The qualified
archaeologist and Native American monitor shall
have the authority to halt construction activities in
the event any cultural materials are encountered
during ground-disturbing construction activities. The
qualified archeologist and Native American monitor
shall keep a daily monitoring log on days that
monitoring occurs documenting construction
activities that were monitored, location of the
monitoring, and any cultural materials identified.

These daily monitoring logs shall be made available
to the City upon request.

MM TCR-1.3: Treatment Plan. In the event any
significant cultural materials are encountered during
construction, construction within a radius of 50 feet
of the find would be halted, the Director of Planning
shall be notified, and the on-site qualified
archaeologist shall examine the find and make
appropriate recommendations regarding the
significance of the find and the appropriate
treatment of the resource.

The qualified archeologist in collaboration with a
Native American monitor, registered with the Native
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
construction
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that the qualified
archaeologist’s
recommendations are
incorporated into the treatment
plan for any encountered cultural
materials.

At the time of
the find.

Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
48 Packet Pg. 235 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONTIORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
12 JUNE 2024
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
American Heritage Commission for the City of Palo
Alto and that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area as described in Public
Resources Code Section 21080.3, shall prepare and
implement a treatment plan that reflects permit-
level detail pertaining to depths and locations of
excavation activities. The treatment plan shall
contain, at a minimum:

I
dentification of the scope of work and range of
subsurface effects (including location map and
development plan), including requirements for
preliminary field investigations.

Description of the environmental setting (past and
present) and the historic/prehistoric background of
the parcel (potential range of what might be found).

Monitoring schedules and individuals.

Development of research questions and goals to be
addressed by the investigation (what is significant vs. what is redundant information).

Detailed field strategy to record, recover, or avoid
the finds and address research goals.

Analytical methods.

Report structure and outline of document contents.

Disposition of the artifacts.

Security approaches or protocols for finds.

Appendices: all site records, correspondence, and
consultation with Native Americans, etc.

The treatment plan shall utilize data recovery
methods to reduce impacts on subsurface resources.

The treatment plan must be reviewed and approved
by the Director of Planning, or the Director’s
designee prior to implementation of the plan.

MM TCR-1.4: Evaluation. The project applicant shall
notify the Director of Planning, Native American
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
During
construction
City of Palo Alto
PDS Department
Ensure that any historic or
prehistoric material identified in
At the time of
the find.

Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
49 Packet Pg. 236 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN 13
Environmental Impact Mitigation Measure
Implementation
Responsibility
Implementation
Timing
Monitoring
Responsibility Monitoring Action
Monitoring
Frequency
Monitor, and Archeological Monitor, of any finds
during grading or other construction activities. Any
historic or prehistoric material identified in the
project area during excavation activities shall be
evaluated for eligibility for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources as determined by the
California Office of Historic Preservation. Data
recovery methods may include, but are not limited
to, backhoe trenching, shovel test, hand auguring,
and hand-excavation. The techniques used for data
recovery shall follow the protocols identified in the
approved treatment plan. Data recovery shall
include excavation and exposure of features, field
documentation, and recordation. All documentation
and recordation shall be submitted to the Northwest
Information Center, and the Director of Planning.
the project area during
excavation activities shall be
evaluated for eligibility for listing
in the California Register of
Historic Resources as determined
by the California Office of Historic
Preservation.

Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
50 Packet Pg. 237 of 554

NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL EIR

CITY OF PALO ALTO

MITIGATION MONTIORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
14 MAY 2024
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft Resolution to
Certify the SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
51 Packet Pg. 238 of 554

PALO   ALTO   COMPREHENSIVE   PLAN
LAND   USE   AND   COMMUNITY   DESIGN   ELEMENT
31 State  law  (California  Government  Code  Section  65302.10)  requires  the City  to  address  potential  regional  inequity  and  infrastructure  deficits within  disadvantaged  unincorporated  communities  (DUCs)  in  this Element.  There  are  no  DUCs  within  the  Palo  Alto  Sphere  of  Influence (SOI) with public services or infrastructure needs or deficiencies.

PALO ALTO AIRPORT
Palo Alto Airport (PAO) is a general aviation airport owned and operated by the City of Palo Alto. PAO occupies 102 acres of land east of Highway 101 in the baylands and has one paved runway. The airport functions as a reliever to three Bay Area airports. PAO facilities include an air traffic control  towe
r  operated  by  the  Federal  Aviation  Administration  and  a terminal building. Flight clubs and fixed base operators operate on‐site, offering fuel sales, flight lessons, pilot training and aircraft sales, rentals, maintenance  and  repair.  From  1967  to  2015,  PAO  was  operated  by Santa  Clara  County  under  a  lease  agreement.  Ope rations  and  control have  since  been  transferred  to  the  City  and  key  challenges  ahead include addressing deterioration of runway conditions, addressing noise impacts  and  hours  of  operation  and  the  relationship  between  the Airport and the Baylands Master Plan.

LAND USE MAP AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Map  L‐6  shows  each  land  use  designation  within  the  city  of  Palo  Alto.

The land use designations translate the elements of city structure into a detailed  map  that  presents  the  community’s  vision  for  future  land  use development  and  conservation  on  public  and  private  land  in  Palo  Alto through the year 2030. Land use designa tions specific to neighborhoods covered  by  Area  Plans  are  defined  in  detail  within  the  corresponding Exhibit B
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft
Resolution to Certify the
SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
52 Packet Pg. 239 of 554

PALO   ALTO   COMPREHENSIVE   PLAN
LAND  USE   AND   COMMUNITY   DESIGN   ELEMENT
32 Area  Plan  policy  documents.  Residential  densities  are  expressed  in terms of  dwelling units per acre. Population  densities per acre  are not absolute limits.

Building  intensities  for  non‐residential  uses  are  expressed  in  terms  of floor  area  ratio  (FAR),  which  is  the  ratio  of  gross  building  floor  area (excluding  areas  designated  for  parking,  etc.)  to  net  lot  area,  both expressed in square feet. FAR does not regulate buil ding placement or form, only the spatial relationship between building size and lot size; it represents  an  expectation  of  the  overall  intensity  of  future development.

The  maximums  assigned  to  the  land  use  designations  below  do  not constitute  entitlements,  nor  are  property  owners  or  developers guaranteed that an individual proje
ct, when tested against the General
Plan’s policies, will be able or permitted to achieve these maximums.

LAND  USE DEFINITIONS
AREA PLAN
Area  Plans  may  include  unique  land  use  designations  within  their boundaries,  applicable  only  to  the  corresponding  area.  These  distinct designations  for  different  Area  Plans  are  described  in  detail  within  the respective Area Plan policy documents.

OPEN SPACE
Publicly Owned Conservation Land: Open lands whose primary purpose is  the  preservation  and  enhancement  of  the  natural  state  of  the  land and its plants and animals. Only resource management, recreation and educational  activities  compatible  with  resource  conservation  are allowed.

Public  Park:  Open  lands  whose  primary  purpose  is  public  access  for active recreation and who se character is essentially urban. These areas, which  may  have  been  planted  with  non‐indigenous  landscaping,  may Item 9
Attachment A - Draft
Resolution to Certify the
SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
53 Packet Pg. 240 of 554

!
!

FOOTHILL
EXPY

Y A W N A I B A F
SA
ND HI
LL RD

ALMA ST

SEALE AVE

SAN ANTONIO RD
OREGON

EXPYQUARRY RD
LOM

A VERDE AVE

ARASTRADERO RD

E CHARLE

STON RD

EMBARCADERO W
AY

PASTEUR DR

CALIFORNI
A AVE

E V A N L O C N I L

UNIVERSITY AVE

JUNIPERO SERRA BLVD

D R L L I M E G A P
§¨¦280
|ÿ82
£¤101
Mountain View
East Palo Alto
Stanford
University
Los Altos Hills
Menlo Park
S A N

F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
Los Altos
Arastradero Preserve
Baylands
Preserve
Byxbee
Park

SOFA II CAP

SOFA I CAP
Baylands Master Plan
East Charleston Road
S A N

F R A N C I S C O
B A Y
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 10.125
Miles
Source: ESRI, 2010; Tiger Lines, 201 0; USGS, 2010; NHD, 2013; City of Palo Alto, 2013; PlaceWorks, 2015.

Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations
Residential
Single Family Res
Multi-Family Res
Mixed Use
Commercial
Hotel Commercial
Service Commercial
Neighborhood C ommercial
Regional/Community Co mmercial
Business/Industrial
Light Industrial
Research/Office Park
Other

SOFA II CAP

SOFA I CAP
School District Land
Major Institution/Special Facility
Streamside Open Space
Public Park
Open Space/Controlled Develop ment
Public Conserva tion Land
Stanford University Land Use Designations
Academic Campus
Campus Residen tial - Low Density
Campus Residen tial - Moderate Density
Open Space/Field Research
Campus Open Space
Special Conserva tion
Lake/Reservoir
! Caltrain Stations
Urban Service Area
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
Railroads

P A L O A L T O G E N E R A L P L A N U P D A T E

L A ND U S E E L E M E N T
M A P L - 6

C O M P R E H E N S I V E P L A N L A N D U S E D E S I G N A T I O N S As amended on December 19, 2022
NVCAP
NVCAP
Item 9
Attachment A - Draft
Resolution to Certify the
SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
54 Packet Pg. 241 of 554

Exhibit C:

This Exhibit is provided as Attachment G to Council report 2406-3197.

Item 9
Attachment A - Draft
Resolution to Certify the
SEIR and Adopt the
NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
55 Packet Pg. 242 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 1 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

Ordinance No.

Ordinance of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Adding Chapter 18.29 (North Ventura (NV) District Regulations) and Amending Chapters 18.14 (Housing Incentives), 18.24 (Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards), and 16.65 (Citywide Affordable Housing Requirements) to Implement the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP)

The Council of the City of Palo Alto ORDAINS as follows:

SECTION 1. Chapter 18.29 (North Ventura (NV) District Regulations) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is added to read as follows:

CHAPTER 18.29

NORTH VENTURA (NV) DISTRICT REGULATIONS

18.29.010 Purpose

18.29.020 Applicability of Regulations

18.29.030 Zoning Districts

18.29.040 Definitions

18.29.050 Permitted Uses

18.29.060 Development Standards

18.29.070 Parking and Loading

18.29.080 Context-Based Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards

18.29.090 Housing Incentive Programs for NV District

18.29.100 Non-conforming Uses and Non-Complying Facilities

18.29.110 Transportation Demand Management Plan

18.29.010 Purpose
The purpose of the North Ventura district is to implement the vision and framework of the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) through use regulations and development standards.

18.29.020 Applicability of Regulations
(a) The North Ventura districts shall apply to properties within the NVCAP and designated as North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan within the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan. Where designated, the regulations set forth in this chapter shall apply in lieu of the comparable provisions established by the underlying zoning district regulations.
(b) Refer to the NVCAP for design guidelines related to streets and buildings in conjunction with the regulations contained within this chapter.

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
56 Packet Pg. 243 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 2 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

18.29.030 Zoning Districts
The North Ventura districts shall apply to properties designated on the zoning map by the symbol “NV” in front of the zoning district designation.

The following zoning districts are intended to create and maintain sites for residential, commercial and mixed-use sites:
(a) Single Family Residential District (NV-R1)
The NV-R1 single family residential district is intended to create, preserve, and enhance areas suitable for detached dwellings with a strong presence of nature and with open area affording maximum privacy and opportunities for outdoor living and children’s play. Minimum site area requirements are established to create and preserve variety among neighborhoods, to provide adequate open area, and to encourage quality design. Accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units and acc essory structures or buildings are appropriate. Community uses and facilities are allowed to the extent no net loss of housing would result.
(b) Two Family Residential District (NV-R2)
The NV-R2 two -family residential district is intended to allow a second dwe lling unit, under the same ownership as the initial dwelling unit, in areas designated for single-family use or NVCAP by the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, under regulations that preserve the essential character of single -family use.

Community uses and facilities are allowed to the extent no net loss of housing would result. (c) Medium Density Multiple-Family Residential District (NV-R3) The NV-R3 medium density multiple-family residential district is intended to create, preserve and enhance neighborhoods for multiple-family housing with better transition to lower density residential districts.

Projects at this density are intended for larger parcels that will enable developments to provide their own parking spaces and to meet their open space needs in the form of garden apartments or cluster developments. While there is no maximum density in the NV-R3 residential district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 16 to 30 dwelling units per acre based on the applicable development standards.
(d) High Density Multiple-Family Residential District (NV-R4) The NV-R4 high density multiple -family residential district is intended to create, preserve and enhance locations for apartment living at the greater density deemed appropriate for NVCAP. The most suitable locations for this district are along major transportation corridors which are close to mass transportation facilities and major employment and service centers. While there is no maximum density in the NV -R4 residential district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 61 to 100 dwelling units per acre based on the applicable development standards. (e) Low Density Mixed-Use District (NV-MXL)
The purpose of the NV-MXL district is to allow for small-scale commercial and services with limited amount of residential that is compatible with the surrounding development. While there is no maximum density in the NV -MXL dis trict, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from three to 17 dwelling units per acre.

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
57 Packet Pg. 244 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 3 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

(f) Medium Density Mixed-Use District (NV-MXM)
The purpose of the NV-MXM district is to allow for a compatible mix of residential and limited commercial.

While there is no maximum density in the NV-MXM district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 31 to 70 dwelling units per acre.
(g) High Density Mixed-Use District (NV-MXH)
The purpose of the NV -MXH district is to allow for a mix of retail, restaurant, entertainment and commercial uses on the ground floor with residential on the upper floors, while maintaining a pedestrian- oriented streetscape. It is intended that the active ground floor retail space required will ensure neighborhood-oriented retail and services are provided within walking distance of high density residential. Ground floor active uses are required along El Camino Real. While no maximum density in the NV-MXH district, the NVCAP anticipates realistic development yields ranging from 61 to 100 dwelling units per acre.
(h) Public Facilities District (NV-PF)
The NV-PF public facilities district is designed to accommodate governmental, public utility, educational, and community service or recreational facilities. Within the North Ventura area, an approximate one-acre portion of the NV-PF district may permit a 100% affordable housing project.

18.29.040 Definitions
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
(a) “Street yard” means a yard adjoining a street lot line and may also be a front lot line.

18.29.050 Permitted Uses
(a) The uses of land allowed by this chapter in each zoning district are identified in the following tables.

Land uses that are not listed in the tables are not allowed, except where otherwise noted. Where the last column on the following tables ("Subject to Regulations in") includes a section number, specific regulations in the referenced s ection also apply to the use; however, provisions in other sections not specifically referenced may apply as well.

TABLE 1: PERMITTED AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USES
P = Permitted Use
CUP = Conditional Use Permit Required
TUP = Temporary Use Permit Required
— = Not Permitted
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
58 Packet Pg. 245 of 554

Page 4 of 19 ends

ATTACHMENT F

LAND USE NV-
R1
NV-
R2
NV-
R3
NV-
R4
NV-
MXL
(1)(5)
NV-
MXM
(5)
NV-
MXH
NV-
PF
Subject to
Regulations
In:

ACCESSORY AND SUPPORT USES
Accessory facilities
and activities
customarily
incidental to the
permitted use
P P P P P P P — 18.40

18.10.080

18.12.080
Accessory Dwelling
Unit & Junior
Accessory Dwelling
Unit when
accessory to
primary and
permitted
residential use
P P P P P P P — 18.09
Home Occupations,
when accessory to
permitted
residential use
P P P P P P P P 18.42
Horticulture,
Gardening, and
Growing of food
products for
consumption by
occupants of a site
P P P P P P P —

EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS, AND ASSEMBLY USES
Private Clubs,
Lodges, or Fraternal
Organizations,
excluding any such
facility operated as
a business for profit
— — — CUP CUP — — —
Private Educational
Facilities
CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP P P —
Religious
Institutions
CUP CUP CUP CUP P P P —
OFFICE USES(2)
Administrative
Office Services
— — — — P P P — 18.29.050(a)
Medical Offices — — — — P P P — 18.29.050(a)
Professional and
General Business
Offices
— — — — P P P — 18.29.050(a)

PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC USES
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
59 Packet Pg. 246 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 5 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

Community Centers CUP CUP CUP CUP — — — CUP
(3)

Utility Facilities
essential to
provision of utility
services but
excluding
construction or
storage yards,
maintenance
facilities, or
corporation yards.

CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP —

RECREATION USES
Neighborhood
Recreational
Centers
— — CUP CUP — — — CUP
(3)

Commercial
Recreation
— — — — CUP CUP CUP CUP
(3)

Outdoor Recreation
Services
CUP CUP CUP CUP — CUP CUP CUP
(3)

Youth Clubs — — — — — — — CUP
(3)

RESIDENTIAL USES
Single-Family P P — — — — — —
Two-Family P P — — — — — — 18.42.180
Multiple-Family — — P P P P P P(4)
Residential Care
Homes
P P P P P P P —

RETAIL USES
Eating and Drinking
Services, except
drive-in and take-
out services
— — P P P P P CUP
(3)

18.40.160,

18.29.050(c)
Personal Services
and Retail Services
of a neighborhood-
serving nature
— — P P P P P CUP
(3)

18.40.160,

18.29. 050(c)
Liquor stores — — — — — P P — 18.40.160,

18.29. 050(c)

SERVICE USES
Animal Care,
excluding boarding
and kennels
— — — — P P P — 18.29. 050(c)
Convalescent
Facilities
— — — CUP P P P —
Day Care Centers CUP CUP CUP P P P P — 18.40.160
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
60 Packet Pg. 247 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 6 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

Large Family Day
Care Homes
P P P P P P P P(3)
Small Family Day
Care Homes
P P P P P P P P(3)
Large Adult Day
Care Homes
CUP CUP P P P P P P(3)
Small Adult Day
Care Homes
P P P P P P P P(3)
Financial Services — — — — P P P — 18.29.050(a)

18.29.060(b)
General Business
Services
— — — — P P P — 18.29. 050(a)

18.29.060(b)
Hotels — — — — — P P — 18.40.160,

18.16.060(d)
Personal Services — — — — P P P — 18.40.160,

18.29. 050(c)

18.29.060(b)

AGRICULTURAL AND OPEN SPACE USES
Park uses and uses
incidental to park
operation
— — — — — — — P
All facilities owned
or leased, and
operated or used,
by the City of Palo
Alto, the County of
Santa Clara, the
State of California,
the government of
the United States,
the Palo Alto
Unified School
District, or any
other
governmental
agency, or leased
by any such agency
to another party
— — — — — — — P
Utility Facilities — — — — — — — CUP

TEMPORARY USES
Temporary Uses — — TUP TUP — — — — 18.42.050
Farmer’s Markets — — — — — CUP CUP —
Temporary Parking
Facilities, provided
that such facilities
shall remain no
— — — — — CUP CUP CUP
(3)

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
61 Packet Pg. 248 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 7 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

more than five
years

Notes:
(1) For NV-MXL zoning district, the total floor area of non-residential uses permitted and conditionally permitted on a lot shall not exceed 5,000 square feet.
(2) For office uses, total floor area of permitted office uses on a lot shall not exceed 5,000 square feet. (3) Provided such use is conducted on property owned by the City of Palo Alto, the County of Santa Clara, the State of California, the government of the United States, the Palo Alto Unified School District, or any other governmental agency, and leased for said uses. (4) Only a 100% Affordable Housing Project is permitted. Development shall follow NV-R4 standards. (5) Ground floor uses shall comply with the ground floor edge framework set forth in NVCAP section

2.3. (a) Office Use Restrictions
(1) Conversion of Ground Floor Housing and Non -Office Commercial to Office Medical, Professional, and Business offices shall not be located on the ground floor, unless any of the following apply to such offices:
(A) Have been continuously in existence in that space since DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP, and as of such date, were neither non -conforming nor in the process of being amortized pursuant to Chapter

18.30(I);
(B) Occupy a space that was not occupied by housing, neighborhood business service, retail services, personal services, eating and drinking services, or automotive service on DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP or thereafter;
(C) Occupy a space that was vacant on DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP; or (D) Are located in new or remodeled ground floor area built on or after DATE OF ADOPTION OF NVCAP if the ground floor area devoted to housing, retail services, eating and drinking services, and personal services does not decrease.
(E) Along El Camino Real, the office use has a consistent flow of in-person customers visiting the business, such as a dentist or medical office.
(2) Size Restrictions on Office Uses in the NV District (A) Total floor area of permitted office uses on a lot shall not exceed 5,000 square feet. (b) Late Night Use and Activities
Late Night Use and Activities requirements established in Section 18.42.040 shall apply to NV zoning districts.
(c) Active Ground Floor Commercial Uses
The NVCAP requires active ground floor uses along the El Camino Real corridor and encourages active ground floor uses on other designated streets. Active uses are activities and functions that promote social Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
62 Packet Pg. 249 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 8 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

engagement, vitality, and interaction within a community. Refer to NVCAP, Section 2.3 for detailed requirements.
(1) Active ground floor commercial uses generally include retail, personal services, neighborhood business service, and eating and drinking establishments. These may also include other active uses such as daycare, building lobbies, spaces accessory to residential uses such as fitness rooms, work spaces, leasing offices, bicycle facilities (Class I) with direct access to the sidewalk. Office uses may be included only to the extent they are permitted in ground floor regulations, are consistent with 18.29.080(a) and have a regular flow of in-person customers.
(2) Ground floor commercial uses are required for properties with frontage along El Camino Real, as shown in the NVCAP Section 2.3 (Ground Floor Edges).
(3) Ground floor commercial uses shall have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 14 feet. (4) Retail or retail-like at the ground floor is required at the intersections of El Camino Real and Olive Avenue, and El Camino Real and Portage Avenue.
(5) 100% affordable housing projects are exempt from providing ground floor commercial uses.

18.29.060 Development Standards
(a) The following tables specify the development standards that shall apply to NV district properties.

Where the last column on the following tables ("Subject to Regulations in") includes a section number, specific regulations in the refe renced section also apply to the development standard; however, provisions in other sections may apply as well.

TABLE 1: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R1 NV-R2 Subject to
Regulations
In:

Minimum Setbacks Setback lines imposed by a special
setback map pursuant to Chapter

20.08 of this code may also apply

18.10.050
Street yard (ft) Pepper Ave: Olive Ave: 18.29.020(b)
10’ to create a 10’
12’ effective
sidewalk width
(1)
Olive Ave:
10’
Height (ft) 35’ 35’
Parking None None 18.29.070
Other development standards See regulations
in Chapter 18.12
See regulations
in Chapter 18.10

Notes:
(1) The effective sidewalk width includes the pedestrian clear zone and landscape/furniture zone as described in PAMC 18.24.020.

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
63 Packet Pg. 250 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 9 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

TABLE 2: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL & MUTLI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R3 NV-R4 Subject to
Regulations
In:

Minimum Site Specifications
Site Area (ft2)
Site Width (ft)
Site Depth (ft)
8,500
70 100

Minimum Setbacks
Street Yard (ft) Park Blvd.: 10’
Ash St: 5’
Acacia Ave: 5’
Portage Ave: 5’
Park Blvd.: 10’
Olive Ave.: 20’
Ash St.: 5’
Page Mill Rd:
sufficient to create a
12’ effective
sidewalk width(2)(3)

18.29.020(b)
Interior Side Yards (ft) 5’ 5’
Interior Rear Yards (ft) 10’ 10’
Build-to-Lines 50% of frontage built to setback(1)
33% of side street built to setback(1)

Maximum Height (ft)
Standard 45’ 65’ 18.29.100
Daylight Plane, for side and rear lot
lines for sites abutting any NV-R1 or
NV-R2 district or abutting a site
containing a single-family or two-
family residential use in a mixed-use
district
10’ initial height
45-degree daylight plane angle

Daylight Plane, for side and rear lot
lines for sites abutting any NV-R3,
NV-R4, Planned Community, or
mixed-use district that does not
contain a single-family or two-family
residential use
Refer to 18.24.050(b)(1)(C)
Maximum Lot Coverage (%)
Base 60 80
Additional area permitted to be
covered by covered patios or
overhangs otherwise in compliance
with all applicable laws
5 5
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Maximum Residential FAR 1.5:1 3.0:1
Maximum Non-residential FAR 0.15:1 0.15:1 18.29.050(c)
Total Mixed-Use FAR 1.5:1 3.0:1
Residential Density (net units per acre)
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
64 Packet Pg. 251 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 10 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-R3 NV-R4 Subject to
Regulations
In:

Maximum units per acre None None
Minimum units per acre 16 61
Minimum Landscape/Open Space
Coverage (%)(4)
30 10
Minimum Usable Open Space (ft2
per unit)
150 150
Minimum Common Open Space (ft2
per unit)
75 75
Minimum Private Open Space (ft2
per unit)
50 50
Landscape Requirements 18.40.130
Parking None Required 18.29.070
Notes:
(1) 25-foot driveway access permitted regardless of frontage. (2) No parking or loading space, whether required or optional, shall be located in the first 10 feet adjoining the street property line of any required yard. (3) Any minimum front, street side, or interior yard shall be planted and maintained as a landscaped screen excluding areas required for access to the site. A solid wall or fence between 5 and 8 feet in height shall be constructed along any common interior lot line. (4) Landscape coverage may be provided above the ground-floor.

TABLE 3: MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD
NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH Subject to
Regulations
In:

Minimum Site
Specifications
Site Area (ft2)
Site Width (ft)
Site Depth (ft)
None Required
Minimum Setbacks
Street Yard (ft) Ash St.: 5’ El Camino Park Blvd: 5’ 18.29.020(b) Olive Ave.: 10’ Real: sufficient El Camino Real:

Portage Ave: 0’ to create a 12’ sufficient to
Pepper Ave: 10’ effective create a 12’
sidewalk
width(1)(2)
El Camino
effective
sidewalk
width(1)(2)

Real: sufficient Oregon
to create a 12’ Expy/Page Mill
effective Rd: sufficient to
sidewalk
width(1)(2)
create a 12’
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
65 Packet Pg. 252 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 11 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD
NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH Subject to
Regulations
In:

Pepper: 10’ effective
Olive Ave 10’ sidewalk(1)(2)
Ash St: 5’ Lambert Ave: 5’
Park Blvd: 10’ Acacia Ave: 5’
Lambert Ave: Portage Ave: 5’
5’
Portage Ave: 5’
Acacia Ave: 5’
Build-to-Lines None For properties abutting El Camino
Real:
50% of frontage built to setback(1)
33% of side street built to
setback(1)

Rear Yard (ft) 10’ 10’ for 10’ for residential
residential portion/ none for
portion/ none commercial
for commercial portion
portion
Rear Yard abutting
residential zone district
(ft)
10’ 10’ 10’
Interior Side Yard (ft) 10’ 5’ 5’
Build-to-lines None Required
Permitted Setback
Encroachments
Refer to Section 18.40.070
Maximum Setback (ft) Not applicable El Camino
Real: 10’
El Camino Real:
10’

Maximum Lot Coverage
(%)
50 100 100
Minimum
Landscape/Open Space
Coverage (%)
20 10 10
Usable Open Space
(Private and/or
Common) (ft2)
150 per unit 18.16.090
Maximum Height (ft) 18.29.100
Standard 35’ 55’ 65’
Ground Floor Height Refer to Section 18.24.060(c)(5)(A) Daylight Plane for lot
lines abutting one or
more residential zoning
Daylight plane height and slope shall be identical to those of the most restrictive residential zoning district abutting the lot line

districts
Residential Density (net units per acre)
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
66 Packet Pg. 253 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 12 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD
NV-MXL NV-MXM NV-MXH Subject to
Regulations
In:

Maximum units per
acre
None Required
Minimum units per acre 3 31 61
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Maximum Residential
FAR

0.5:1 2.0:1 3.0:1
Maximum Non-
residential FAR(4)

0.25:1 0.25:1 0.25:1 18.29.050(c)

18.29.060(c)
Minimum Mixed-Use
Ground Floor Commercial
FAR

0.15:1 0.15:1 0.15:1 18.29.050(c)
Total Mixed-Use FAR 0.5:1(4) 2.0:1 3.0:1
Parking None Required 18.29.070
Notes:
(1) No parking or loading space, whether required or optional, shall be located in the first 10 feet adjoining the street property line of any required yard. (2) Any minimum front, street side, or interior yard shall be planted and maintained as a landscaped screen excluding areas required for access to the site. A solid wall or fence between 5 and 8 feet in height shall be constructed along any common interior lot line. (3) The 150-foot measurement may be reduced to 50 feet at minimum, subject to approval by the Planning Director, upon recommendation by the Architectural Review Board pursuant to criteria set forth in Chapter 18.76.
(4) As provided in 18.29.060(c), maximum FAR for hotels shall be 2.0:1. Hotel projects in the NV-MXL zone may reach a Total Mixed-Use FAR of 2.0:1.

TABLE 4: PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS(1)

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-PF Subject to
Regulations
In:

Minimum Setbacks
Street Yard (ft) Portage Ave: 0’
Park Blvd: 10’
Lambert Ave: 5’

18.29.020(b)
Rear Yard (ft) 10’ 18.40.140
Side Yard (ft) 5’
Maximum Site Coverage (%)
Multiple-Family Residential Use
Other Uses
100
20 Minimum Landscape/Open Space Coverage (%)
Multiple-Family Residential Use
Other Uses
0 Not applicable

Usable Open Space (Private and/or Common) (ft2)
Multiple-Family Residential Use 150 per unit

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
67 Packet Pg. 254 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 13 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

DEVELOPMENT STANDARD NV-PF Subject to
Regulations
In:

Maximum Height (ft)
Multiple-Family Residential Use
Other Uses
65’

18.29.100
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Multiple-Family Residential Use
Other Uses

3.0:1

1.0:1

Parking 18.29.070
Notes:
(1) Residential standards in this table shall only be applicable to 100% Affordable Housing Projects. For standards not listed in Table 4 for 100% Affordable Housing Projects in NV-PF, refer to applicable NV- R4 development standards in PAMC 18.29.060, Table 2.
(b) Storefront Guidelines
Where active use and retail frontages are required or located within the NV district on the ground floor, the following design standards shall apply:
(1) Exterior windows on the ground floor shall use transparent glazing to the extent feasible. Low -e glass or minimal tinting to achieve sun control is permitted, so long as the glazing appears transparent when viewed from the ground level.
(2) Window coverings are not permitted on the ground floor during typical business hours. Where operations preclude transparency (e.g., theaters) or where privacy requires window coverings, sidewalk- facing frontage shall include items of visual interest including displays of merchandise or artwork; visual access shall be provided to a minimum depth of three (3) feet. (3) No more than 10% of the total street- facing building façade or a maximum of 25 feet in width, whichever is greater, shall be dedicated to mechanical equipment rooms, parking garage entrances, exit stairs, and other facilities necessary for building operation. (c) Hotel Regulations
(1) The purpose of these regulations is to allow floor area for development of hotels more than floor area limitations for other commercial uses, to provide a visi tor-serving use that results in an enhanced business climate, increased transient occupancy tax and sales tax revenue, and other community and economic benefits to the city.
(2) Hotels, where they are a permitted use, may develop to a maximum FAR of 2.0:1, subject to the following limitations:
(A) The hotel use must generate transient occupancy tax (TOT) as provided in Chapter 2.33 of the
Palo Alto Municipal Code; and
(B) No room stays more than thirty days are permitted, except where the city council approves longer stays through an enforceable agreement with the applicant to provide for compensating revenues. (3) Hotels may include residential condominium use, subject to:

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
68 Packet Pg. 255 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 14 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

(A) No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the floor area shall be devoted to condominium use; and
(B) No more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the total number of lodging units shall be devoted to condominium use; and
(C) A minimum FAR of 1.0 shall be provided for the hotel/condominium building(s); and (D) Where residential condominium use is proposed, room stays for other hotel rooms shall not exceed thirty (30) days.
(4) Violation of this chapter is subject to enforcement action for stays more than thirty days not permitted under the provisions of this chapter, in which case each day of room stay more than thirty days shall constitute a separate violation and administrative penalties shall be assessed pursuant to Chapters

1.12 and 1.16.

18.29.070 Parking and Loading
In accordance with Assembly Bill 2097 (2022), no minimum automobile parking is required for properties within the NV Districts except for projects including transient lodging. There are no maximum parking standards. Standards for transient lodging and other parking standards, such as bicycle parking, and parking design standards are contained within PAMC Chapters 18.52 and 18.54.

18.29.080 Context-Based Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards In addition to the development standards prescribed in 18.29.050, all Housing Development Projects shall comply with the objective standards outlined in Chapter 18.24, as defined herein. All other developments, and Housing Development Projects that elect to deviate from one or more objective design standards in Chapter 18.24, shall meet the Context Based Design Criteria, as determined by the Director pursuant to the Architectural Review process. In the event of any conflict between the d evelopment standards established in this Chapter and those established in Chapter 18.24, the NVCAP standards shall prevail. (a) Multiple Family Context-Based Design Criteria
Refer to Section 18.13.060 for the Context Based Design Criteria. (b) Mixed-Use and Commercial Context-Based Design Criteria Refer to Section 18.16.090 for the Context Based Design Criteria.

18.29.090 Housing Incentive Programs for NV District
(a) Housing development projects in the NV Districts may utilize any Housing Incentive Program or Affordable Housing Incentive Program set forth in Sections 18.14.030 and 18.14.040.

18.29.100 Non-conforming Uses and Non-Complying Facilities Any uses or facilities rendered non- conforming or non -complying by this Chapter shall be subject to Chapter 18.70, including the schedules for required termination of non -conforming uses under Section

18.70.070.

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
69 Packet Pg. 256 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 15 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

18.29.110 Transportation Demand Management Plan
A transportation demand management plan shall be required for all new development projects or any projects that meet the conditions listed in PAMC Section 18.52.030(i).

SECTION 2. Table 1 of Section 18.14.020 (Housing Element Opportunity Sites) of Chapter 18.14 (Housing Incentives) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions underlined):

Table 1
Housing Element Opportunity Site Development Standards
(Residential and Commercial Mixed Use Districts)
Base Zoning
District
Maximum Far(1) Minimum
Landscape
Coverage
Residential Density
(du/ac)(4)
Other
Development
Standards
Residential Total Minimum Maximum
CC(2) 1.5 2.0 (3) 20 See base
district
See base district
regulations:

CC 1.25 1.25 (3) 20 regulation
s: 18.16.0
60 18.16.060
CS (El Camino
Real)

1.25 1.25 (3) 20
CS (Other) 1.25 1.25 (3) 20 See HE
Appendix
D
CN (El Camino 1.25 1.25 30%(3) 20 See base
Real) district
regulation
s: 18.16.0
60 CN (Other) 1.25 1.25 30%(3) 20 See HE
Appendix
D
CD-C 2.0 2.0 (2) (3) 20 See base See base district
district regulations:
regulation
s: 18.18.0 18.18.060
60 Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
70 Packet Pg. 257 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 16 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

CD-N 1.5 1.5 (3) 20 See HE
Appendix
D

RP 1.25 1.25 (3) 25 None; 40
du/ac
anticipate d
See base district
regulations:

18.20.040

RM-40 1.5 1.5 (3) 31 See HE
Appendix
See base district
regulations:

RM-30 1.25 1.25 (3) 20 D

18.13.040
RM-20 1.25 1.25 See 18.13.0
40 20
NV-R3 See base district regulations: 18.29.060, except that maximum height shall be 50’, maximum lot coverage shall be 70%, and minimum density shall be 25 du/ac.

Notes:
(1) Nothing in this table increases the non-residential floor area permitted in any district. (2) FAR may be increased with transfer of development rights; see Chapter 18.18 for details. (3) Landscape coverage may be provided above the ground-floor. If standard is not specified, refer to base district regulations.
(4) Where no maximum density is provided in terms of du/ac, maximum density shall be determined by estimating the realistic development capacity of the site based on the objective development standards applicable to the project. Where noted, refer to Housing Element Appendix D: Sites Inventory for specified densities.

SECTION 3. Section 18.24.010 (Purpose and Applicability) of Chapter 18.24 (Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Palo Alto Municipal Code is amended to read as follows (additions underlined, and unchanged text omitted by bracketed ellipses):

18.24.010 Purpose and Applicability
(a) Purpose
[. . .]
(b) Applicability of Regulations
These regulations apply to new construction and renovations of Housing Development Projects (as defined in Gov. Code 65589.5, but excluding projects compromised of single- or two-family uses with one or more ADUs), including supportive and transitional housing, and residential mixed-use projects with at least two-thirds residential square footage. Regulations Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
71 Packet Pg. 258 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 17 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

apply both new construction and renovations, within the following zones and combining districts:
(1) C hapter 18.12: R-1, for multiple-family uses only (2) Chapter 18.13: RM-20, RM-30, RM-40
(23) Chapter 18.16: CN, CC, CC(2), CS
(34) Chapter 18.18: CD-C, CD-S, CD-N
(45) Chapter 18.20: MOR, ROLM, ROLM(E), RP, RP(5), GM
(56) Chapter 18.28: PF
(7) Chapter 18.29: NV-N3, NV-R4, NV-MXM, NV-MXH
(68) Chapter 18.34: PTOD combining district
Housing Development Projects include multifamily housing with three or more units ("multiple- family use" as defined in Section 18.04.030), supportive and transitional housing, and residential mixed-use projects with at least two-thirds residential square footage shall meet the objective design standards.
(c) Process and Alternative Compliance
[. . .]
SECTION 4. Section 16.65.030 (Basic affordable housing requirement - residential ownership projects) of Chapter 16.65 (Citywide Affordable Housing Requirements) of Title 16 (Building Regulations) is amended to read as follows ( additions underlined, and unchanged text omitted by bracketed ellipses):

16.65.030 Basic affordable housing requirement - residential ownership projects.

The provisions of this section shall apply to all residential ownership projects, including the residential ownership portion of any mixed use project containing three or more units, except for any residential ownership project exempt under Section 16.65.025. (a) Unless an alternative is approved as described in Section 16.65.080, residential ownership projects shall provide the following:
(1) For projects on sites of less than five acres, fifteen percent of the dwelling units in the project shall be made available at affordable sales price to very low, low, and moderate income households;
(2) For projects on sites of five acres or more and all townhome projects in the NV districts, twenty percent of the dwelling units in the project shall be made available at affordable sales price to very low, low, and moderate income households; and Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
72 Packet Pg. 259 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 18 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

(3) For projects that convert existing rental housing to condominiums, other residential ownership or nonresidential space or that remove existing rental housing, twenty-five percent of the dwelling units in the project shall be made available at affordable sales price to very low, low, and moderate income households.
(4) Calculations of the number of affordable units required by this section shall be based on the number of dwelling units in the residential project, excluding any density bonus units.

Projects shall not receive a credit for any existing dwelling units demolished as part of the project. (b) The affordable units shall be made available at the following affordable sales prices:
[. . .]
SECTION 5. Section 16.65.040 (Basic requirement - mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects) of Chapter 16.65 (Citywide Affordable Housing Requirements) of Title 16 (Building Regulations) is amended to read as follows (additions underlined; deletions struck- through):

16.65.040 Basic requirement - mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects. (a) Unless the mixed use, nonresidential or residential rental project is exempt under Section 16.65.025 or an alternative is approved as described in Section 16.65.080, all mixed use, nonresidential and residential rental projects shall pay housing impact fees as spec ified in Section 16.65.060 to mitigate the projects' impacts on the need for affordable housing; except:
(1) that theThe residential ownership portion of a mixed use project containing three or more units shall comply with Section 16.65.030.
(2) In the NV districts, residential rental projects, including mixed use projects containing residential rental units, shall provide fifteen percent of the dwelling units in the project at rates affordable to lower income households.

SECTION 6 . Pipeline Projects. This Ordinance and the NVCAP shall not apply to any project application deemed complete prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. Any project completed pursuant to such application shall be deemed a legal non-conforming structure and/or use, subject to the provisions of Palo Alto Municipal Code Chapter 18.70.

SECTION 7. On XXXX, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. XXXX, certifying the NVCAP Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the 2030 Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan, and making required findings, including a statement of overriding considerations.

Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
73 Packet Pg. 260 of 554

NOT YET APPROVED

Page 19 of 19 ends

0160145_20240530_ay16

SECTION 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordina nce is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 9. Ef
fective Date. This ordinance shall be effective on the thirty-first day after the date of its adoption (second reading).

INTRODUCED:

PASSED:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTIONS:

ATTEST:

City Clerk Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED:

Assistant City Attorney City Manager

Director of Planning and
Development Services
Item 9
Attachment B - Ordinance
to Implement the NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
74 Packet Pg. 261 of 554

Attachment C:

Link to the Final Supplemental EIR:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development- services/north-ventura-cap/final-eir_nvcap-6-3-24.pdf
Link to the Draft Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program (MMRP):
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development- services/north-ventura-cap/nvcap-final-mmrp-6-3-24.pdf
Link to the Draft Supplemental EIR (appendices can be found under “Environmental Documents” section of the project website)
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development- services/north-ventura-cap/draft-seir-nvcap-march-2024.pdf Link to the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan, June 2024 (clean version):
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development- services/north-ventura-cap/finaldraft_nvcap_clean_2024_06_final_web.pdf Link to the Draft North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan, March 2024:
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development- services/north-ventura-cap/nvcap_publicdraft_2024_03_web2.pdf

Item 9
Attachment C - Links to
the Public Draft NVCA P,
Draft SEIR, Final SEIR, and
MMRP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
75 Packet Pg. 262 of 554

4 5
6 9
Attachment D: Summary of Preferred Plan
City Council endorsed 01/10/2022 & refined 11/14/2022 (or strikethrough) Component Preferred Plan Draft Plan
Housing •530 housing units
•Emphasizes townhomes near
existing residential; mid-rise
residential/mixed-use on corridors
and elsewhere in plan area.
•Taller mid-rise residential/mixed-
use along Park Boulevard adjacent
to train tracks.
•530 housing units
•Emphasizes townhomes on cannery
property. Mid-rise residential/mixed-
use on corridors and elsewhere in the
plan. Affordable housing site adjacent
to public park site. Taller mid-rise
residential/mixed-use along Park
Boulevard adjacent to train tracks.

See also “Height/Density and Transitions”
Affordable
Housing
•Include 100% affordable housing
height limits based on the
minimum height necessary for a
five-story retail affordable housing
project (e.g., 55’) or a six story
non-retail affordable housing
project (e.g., 65’).
•Require 20% BMR for for-sale
townhomes, 15% for for-sale
condos, and for rental 15% BMR or
use in-lieu fee. (66% of units
affordable to households of 80-
100% area median income (AMI)
and up to 33% affordable to
households 100-120% AMI.)
•100% affordable housing height limits
determined by state density bonus
housing law (33’ above base zoning
height limit)
•Requires 20% BMR for for-sale
townhomes, 15% for for-sale condos,
and for rental 15% BMR or use in-lieu
fee. (66% of units affordable to
households of 80-100% area median
income (AMI) and up to 33%
affordable to households 100-120%
AMI.)
See also “Height/Density and Transitions”
Height/Density
and
Transitions
•Place higher heights and greater
densities on El Camino Real and
Page Mill Road, where multifamily
and residential mixed-use buildings
with ground floor retail would be
permitted. Transition between
higher density/height areas and
existing single-family homes
through height transitions.
•Expand Housing Incentive Program
or similar into other areas other
than El Camino Real corridor.
•Rezones proposed in the plan area to
transition from commercial, general
manufacturing and residential to
residential and residential mixed-use
(low, medium, and high density).
•Greater heights and densities are
located along corridors (El Camino
Real, Page Mill and Park Boulevard).

Height is limited for cannery building
adaptive reuse projects. Height
transitions will follow objective
standard requirements in the Palo Alto
Municipal Code.

Item 9
Attachment D - Summary
of the Endorsed Preferred
Plan and Refinements

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
76 Packet Pg. 263 of 554

4 5
6 9
Component Preferred Plan Draft Plan
•Allow 45 feet transition on El
Camino
•Raise the height limit along Park
Blvd to 55 feet, for residential or
residential mixed-use without
increasing commercial FAR
•Request Staff to evaluate zoning
changes that would increase FAR
for housing on commercial sites
along Park Blvd. and Page Mill Rd.
•Height limits range from 30 to 65 feet.
•Increase FAR for residential for 395
Page Mill and Park Boulevard.
•Limits commercial FAR throughout the
plan area.
•Housing Incentive Program would
follow the Citywide Housing Incentive
Program (Chapter 18.14)
Open Space Parks, pedestrian and/or bike
connection, landscape setbacks and
buffers. Creek option #3, full
naturalization. Look for preferred park
locations (larger public spaces
desired). Park development based on
no less than 1.6 acres/1,000 residents
to 1.7 acres/1,000 residents.
•Includes creek option #3 for full
naturalization
•Identifies 2.25-acre public park
location adjacent to creek
Office •Allows existing large-format office
floor area to continue. Once
demolished, the office space may
not be rebuilt.
•Would allow new, ground-floor,
small, professional office (such as
dentist, etc.). (5,000 sf or less)
•Define a low-density R&D zone
limiting employment density. (not
clear on what this means)
•Define strict TDM
•Plan sites are rezoned and allow
limited office space (up to 5,000 sf)
per parcel.
•Existing office space to continue until
demolished, then parcel must conform
with underlying zoning requirements.

See also “Commercial Parking Ratio.”
Retail Would allow ground floor retail.

Encourages active-ground floor uses,
which can be retail or retail-like.

Required on ECR, consider on Park.

Deed restricted retail required to get
15’ first floor height incentive.
•Allows ground floor retail and
encourages ground floor active uses
along Park Boulevard. Requires ground
floor active uses along El Camino Real.

Requires ground floor retail along El
Camino Real at Portage and Acacia.
•Requires minimum ground floor
ceiling height to be consistent with
Item 9
Attachment D - Summary
of the Endorsed Preferred
Plan and Refinements

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
77 Packet Pg. 264 of 554

4 5
6 9
Component Preferred Plan Draft Plan
objective design standards (Chapter

18.24)
340 Portage
(Cannery)
Maintains the cannery building and
Ash Office Building and allows for 2
possible uses of the buildings: (1)
continued use as retail and office
space (2) adaptive re-use into housing
(transition to housing is a long-term
vision). Also permits the construction
of housing on remaining portions of
the parcel, specifically the two
remaining surface parking lots on the
property. Ash Building – Creative Arts
space (see concept plan, page 180)
Expanded setback needed due to
creek naturalization – easements
and/or acquisition needed.
65 feet for 100% affordable site at 340
Portage without retail, (to include 5
stories of residential, with one level
for parking)
Staff will review and return with
recommendation about designation of
340 Portage Rd as a historical resource
•Maintains the cannery building and
Ash Office Building and allows for 2
possible uses of the buildings: (1)
continued use as retail and office
space (2) adaptive re-use into housing
(transition to housing is a long-term
vision).
•Also permits the construction of
housing on remaining portions of the
parcel, specifically the two remaining
surface parking lots on the property.
•2.25-acre public park site identified
•100% Affordable housing site
identified adjacent to the public park
site to comply with development
standards for R-4, including the height
limit of 65’.
•Implementation measure to explore
within the first-year historic
designation of the cannery building
and the Ash building.
395 Page Mill
Rd (Cloudera)
Retain office, parking garage, swale,
etc. Allows multifamily housing at
moderate density on remaining
surface parking lot; allow internal
height of 55’.

Site is rezoned to high density residential.

Allow height up to 65 feet.

Residential
Parking Ratio
•1 space per bedroom, capped at 2
spaces per unit (existing
requirement).
•(Return to PTC to make
recommendations for analysis of
appropriate parking based on Fehr
and Peers study and other studies,
and encourage mechanisms to
discourage street parking)
•No parking minimums or maximums.
•Implementation measure to explore
TDM programs and evaluate parking
management within the area.

Item 9
Attachment D - Summary
of the Endorsed Preferred
Plan and Refinements

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
78 Packet Pg. 265 of 554

4 5
6 9
Component Preferred Plan Draft Plan
•No parking minimums &
maximums
•Define strict TDM and evaluate a
city initiated RPP district to protect
residential parking
Commercial
Parking Ratio
•Blended standard rate same as
Downtown Palo Alto: 1 space per
250 sf.
•Exempt first 1,500 sf of ground
floor commercial floor area from
parking requirement.
•No parking minimums &
maximums
•Define strict TDM
•No parking minimums or maximums.
•Implementation measure to explore
TDM programs and evaluate parking
management within the area.

Transportation
Improvements
•Follow concept plan, see
attachment A (page 34) from
6/2021 council report
•Evaluate removing the woonerf to
decrease congestion as an option
in the EIR
•Plan to follow preferred plan.
•EIR to evaluate woonerf impacts.

Item 9
Attachment D - Summary
of the Endorsed Preferred
Plan and Refinements

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
79 Packet Pg. 266 of 554

ATTACHMENT E – CONSISTENCY WITH NVCAP GOALS & OBJECTIVES Consistency documents can be found at: www.cityofpaloalto.org/nvcap Table 1: NVCAP Goals
Goals

Consistency
Housing and Land Use
Add to the City’s supply of multifamily
housing, including market rate, affordable,
“missing middle,” and senior housing in a
walkable, mixed use, transit-accessible
neighborhood, with retail and commercial
services, open space, and possibly arts and
entertainment uses.

Chapter 2 (Vision) illustrates the overall NVCAP
goals with different strategies. Section 2.2 (Land
Use) includes urban design and land use
frameworks that calibrate the optimal mix of
uses, and provides different types of multi-family
and mixed-use development. Section 2.2 also
specifies the land use program endorsed by the
City Council, which includes additional 530
dwelling units, a new park, and a net reduction of
nonresidential uses. The NVCAP envisions a
walkable neighborhood with better circulation
and community amenities along with mobility
framework (Section 2.4) and ecological
framework (Section 2.5).

Transit, Pedestrian and Bicycle Connections
Create and enhance well-defined
connections to transit, pedestrian, and
bicycle facilities, including connections to the
Caltrain station, Park Boulevard and El
Camino Real.

Section 2.4 (Mobility) of Chapter 2 (Vision)
emphasizes well-balanced and safe streets, with
pedestrian and bicycle facilities designed for all
ages and accessible paths to transit within the
plan area and beyond. Chapter 4 (Accessibility
and Mobility) includes gateway intersection
concept design and street design that would
support achieving these goals. Chapter 4 also
includes standards and guidelines for pedestrian
realm (Section 4.1), Bike Network (Section 4.2),
Transit Access (Section 4.5) and Vehicle
Circulation and Parking (Section 4.6), and TDM
Strategies (Section 4.7) to support the mobility
framework.

Connected Street Grid
Create a connected street grid, filling in
sidewalk gaps and street connections to
California Avenue, the Caltrain Station, and El
Camino Real where appropriate.

Community Facilities and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate development of
new community facilities and infrastructure
with private development, recognizing both
the community’s needs and that such
investments can increase the cost of housing.

To achieve the goal of carefully integrating new
community facilities and infrastructure with
private development, the plan incorporates
several key elements. Standards and guidelines
across Chapter 4 (Accessibility and Mobility) and
Chapter 5 (Parks and Open Space) ensure new
developments seamlessly connect with planned
infrastructure like pedestrian paths, bicycle
facilities, a public park, and naturalization of
Item 9
Attachment E - Summary
of Goals and Objectives
Consistency

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
80 Packet Pg. 267 of 554

Goals

Consistency
Matadero creek. The mobility framework (Section

2.4) and ecological framework (Section 2.5)
further integrate these elements by strategically
placing them alongside private development.

Chapter 3 (Public Realm) provides additional
standards and guidelines that support the
community needs.

Balance of Community Interests
Balance community-wide objectives with the
interests of neighborhood residents and
minimize displacement of existing residents.

Section 2.2 (Land Use) describes different types
of land uses, development types, as well as
ground floor uses that should include commercial
uses. These include community serving retail and
commercial that would support additional
housing envisioned in the plan area. In addition,
Chapter 5 (Parks and Open Space) includes
standards and guidelines that would guide
development of a new park and naturalization of
Matadero creek to provide outdoor and
recreational facilities.

Urban Design, Design Guidelines and
Neighborhood Fabric
Develop human-scale urban design
strategies, and design guidelines that
strengthen and support the neighborhood
fabric. Infill development will respect the
scale and character of the surrounding
residential neighborhood.

In addition to NVCAP zoning ordinance, the
NVCAP document also includes various sections
and chapters that would contribute to well-
balanced and human-scale development to
strengthen and support the neighborhood fabric:
• Chapter 2.6 (Urban Form)
• Chapter 3 (Public Realm),
• Chapter 4 (Accessibility and Mobility)
• Chapter 5 (Parks and Open Space)
• Chapter 6 (Site and Building Design)
• Chapter 7 (Implementation)

Table 2: NVCAP Objectives
Objectives

Consistency
Data Driven Approach:

Employ a data-driven approach that considers
community desires, market conditions and
forecasts, financial feasibility, existing uses
and development patterns, development
The NVCAP was developed with numerous
technical and background reports, including but
not limited to:
• Existing Conditions Report
• Matadero Creek Renaturalization Report
Item 9
Attachment E - Summary
of Goals and Objectives
Consistency

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
81 Packet Pg. 268 of 554

Objectives

Consistency
capacity, traffic and travel patterns,
historic/cultural and natural resources, need
for community facilities (e.g., schools), and
other relevant data to inform plan policies.

• Economic Feasibility Report by Strategic
Economics
• 340 Portage Ave Historic Resource
Evaluation
• NVCAP Windshield Survey and Preliminary
Historic Resource Eligibility Analysis
• Memoranda on VMT and Traffic Analysis

These technical and background reports are
available at the project website:
www.cityofpaloalto.org/nvcap.

Comprehensive User-Friendly Document and
Implementation:

Create a comprehensive but user -friendly
document that identifies the distribution,
location and extent of land uses, planning
policies, development regulations and design
guidelines to enable development and
needed infrastructure investments in the
project area.

The overall document includes graphics, color,
tables organized for optimal readability. The
document is color coded for better navigation
and also includes a table of contents in the
beginning of the document as well as each
chapter to make the document user-friendly.

Guide and Strategy for Staff and Decision
Makers:

Provide a guide and strategy for staff and
decision-makers to bridge the gap between
the goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan and individual development projects in
order to streamline future land use and
transportation decisions.

Chapter 2 (Vision) serves as the foundation,
outlining the NVCAP's overall framework,
including land use, mobility, and ecological
design. Chapter 7 (Implementation) then
provides a clear roadmap by detailing specific
actions and funding strategies that will translate
the vision into reality. In addition, individual
development projects may be able to utilize the
environmental analysis provided in the
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report to
streamline the entitlement process.

Meaningful Community Engagement:

Enable a process with meaningful
opportunities for community engagement,
within the defined timeline, and an outcome
(the CAP document) that reflects the
community’s priorities.

Section 1.7 (The Community Process) of the
NVCAP describes the extensive community
engagement process that contributed to
development of the NVCAP. Information related
public engagement throughout the entire plan
process can be found at the project website:
www.cityofpaloalto.org/nvcap.

Item 9
Attachment E - Summary
of Goals and Objectives
Consistency

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
82 Packet Pg. 269 of 554

Objectives

Consistency
Economic Feasibility:

A determination of the economic and fiscal
feasibility of the plan with specific analysis of
marketplace factors and incentives and
disincentives, as well as a cost-benefit analysis
of public infrastructure investments and
projected economic benefits to the City and
community.

An economic feasibility study was prepared in
November 2020 which assessed three land use
alternatives (Alternatives 1-3). In March 2021, a
supplemental economic feasibility study was
prepared to assess the shortfall or funding gap
for one of lower-density alternatives (Alternative
2) and the economic feasibility of increasing the
inclusionary requirement above 15% for
Alternative 3.

Environmental:

A plan that is protective of public health and a
process that complies with the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act.

A Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
was prepared for the NVCAP. Impacts to
historical resources and air quality were found
significant and unavoidable. The statement of
overriding considerations was prepared
containing a list of the benefits that the project
will bring to the City consistent with General Plan
and NVCAP policies, and included in the
Resolution. In addition, the following sections of
the NVCAP supports environmental and
sustainable design of the neighborhood:
• Section 2.5 (Ecology and Sustainability)
• Section 3.3 (Green Infrastructure)
• Chapter 5 (Parks and Open Space)
• Section 6.5 (Sustainable Design)

Item 9
Attachment E - Summary
of Goals and Objectives
Consistency

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
83 Packet Pg. 270 of 554

4 5
7 0
PTC and ARB Comments on the Public Draft NVCAP
ID Comment Response
PTC Comments from May 31, 2023
PTC 1 Categorize office uses as neighborhood
serving
Included in the NVCAP Section 2.3
PTC 2 Encourage a mix of residential unit sizes Staff recommended modifications to include information encouraging a mix of
residential unit sizes (Section 2.2, Page 34.

See Attachment G for more details)
PTC 3 Active uses: should be required, be clearer Included in the NVCAP Section 2.3 including the revised figure 32
PTC 4 Describe height transitions between high
density residential/mixed use and low
density residential
NVCAP Section 6.1 includes building height
and massing; NVCAP Zoning Ordinance has
reference to Objective Standards related to
daylight plane
PTC 5 Clarify mobility plan for vehicles and
pedestrians
Included in the expanded Chapter 4
(Accessibility and Mobility)
PTC 6 Economic analysis to show shortfall No additional economic analysis was done due to budget constraints
PTC 7 Describe consistency with Housing Element Staff report describes consistency between NVCAP and Housing Element
ARB Comments from June 1, 2023
ARB 1 Place table captions above the table Table captions were moved above the table throughout the document.

ARB 2 Encourage or require more green roofs
(maybe incentivize with additional FAR)
No incentive programs were considered but
green roofs are encouraged in the plan area
per Section 6.6.5.

ARB 3 Only include essential information in the
plan and refer to other documents when
necessary. Example: trees.

After reorganization of the document,
appropriate references were added.

ARB 4 2.1: Make exhibit more realistic Language added that no new or recent development constructed during
preparation of NVCAP reflected in any
exhibits.

ARB 5 Ground floor height is 15’ too tall? Ground floor height changed to 14’ to be consistent with Contextual Design Criteria
and Objective Design Standards
ARB 6 Sustainable design (subcommittee of the
ARB): 6.5.4 through 6.5.7.

No substantial recommendations were
provided to be implemented; new
ordinance is underway for bird safe design.

Item 9
Attachment F - 2023 PTC
and ARB NVCAP
Comments and Staff
Response

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
84 Packet Pg. 271 of 554

4 5
7 0
ID Comment Response
ARB 7 4.6.2 :Provide examples of permeable
pavement.

Updated the Figure 69 in Chapter 4.

ARB 8 2.5: Show more green roofs, solar panels.

Tell more of a story that includes green roof
and solar panels, connection with the open
spaces and creek.

Vertical green spaces
Conceptual figures for the plan added more
green roofs and solar panels but no
additional changes were made to the draft
zoning ordinance as the NVCAP ordinance
follows existing Title 18 requirements on
green roofs and open space requirements.

ARB 9 Figure 42: Provide more setback from
building near creek (see document for
where).

Noted but no changes were made to
graphics.

ARB 10 Figure 46 & 78: This seems inconsistent with
the preferred plan and other illustrative
exhibits because the creek improvement
would occupy portions of these building
envelopes. Shrink the building envelops to
be consistent with the diagram for the creek.

Figure 82 adjusted
ARB 11 3.3: Consider separating out topics The comment addressed by reorganization of the document.

ARB 12 3.3: These are already in the code, should
refer to the code or master plan
The comment addressed by reorganization
of the document.

ARB 13 Figure 77: Replace this exhibit with one from
the Municipal Code 18.24.

Replaced.

ARB 14 2.4, figure 36: The legend mentions priority,
secondary and tertiary streets. Is this
supposed to be “primary,” etc.? Describe
more what these mean.

Removed legend items for priority
secondary and tertiary and replaced with
bike facility information.

ARB 15 6.4.1: Entries must be raised above
sidewalk grade. Is there any consideration
for ADA compliance when we require this?
Is this already in the zoning code.

No changes made; ADA compliance
required per building code.

ARB 16 Can we encourage exploration and reuse of
existing structures? For example for the
audi building and ash office?
Noted. No changes made.

ARB 17 consider adding a FAR bonus as well to
make projects more viable
No incentive program added; the draft
NVCAP ordinance has its own housing
incentive program but only for affordable
housing with extra height allowed. The
Item 9
Attachment F - 2023 PTC
and ARB NVCAP
Comments and Staff
Response

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
85 Packet Pg. 272 of 554

4 5
7 0
ID Comment Response
NVCAP already increased density and
height for the plan area.

ARB 18 ground floor uses packet page 85, office
edges are going to want to go near retail so
having office edge near residential edge
may not make so much sense.

No changes are needed. Limited office
allowed. Office edge removed (See the
updated Figure 32 in Chapter 2)
ARB 19 consider having a focused retail corridor.

The retail seems broken up and
unconcentrated now making it less likely to
be viable.

Figure 32 on Ground Floor Edges in Chapter
is updated to show required retail edges
along El Camino Real and encouraged active
edge along Park Boulevard
ARB 20 bird safe building design—UV coated glass
is not a preferred option
No changes made. The Citywide dark sky
and bird safe ordinance will supersede once
adopted.

ARB 21 Better way to refer to “egg-crate” design on
page 159
No changes made.

ARB 22 need clarifications on ground floor entries
(page 110), 4 active doorways every 200
linear feet
The requirement is specific to woonerf.

Revised the language to specify the
requirement is applicable “between park
and ash” on Portage Avenue.

ARB 23 Paseo between buildings—possibility to
connect greenbelt to the rest of the
neighborhood through paseos—would like
to see birdseye view of that
Figure was updated to remove paseos.

Item 9
Attachment F - 2023 PTC
and ARB NVCAP
Comments and Staff
Response

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
86 Packet Pg. 273 of 554

NVCAP June 2024 Clean Version
https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/files/assets/public/v/1/planning-amp-development-services/north-ventura- cap/finaldraft_nvcap_clean_2024_06_final_web.pdf
*Please note that the printed copy of the June 2024 Clean Version is not included as part of the packet because it was provided to the City Councilmembers on June 3, 2024 to provide sufficient time for review ahead of the staff report.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
87 Packet Pg. 274 of 554

Staff Recommended Modifications to Public Draft NVCAP
Updated: April 2024

Page 2 of 7 ends

Page Chapter/Section Type Staff Recommended Change Reason for Change Ack. Chapter 1 Text Add: “City Council” in the first paragraph Add: Former staff information into the Core Team
Add: A new Senior Transportation Planner to the
Core Team
Corrections
vii Chapter 1, Figures Text Change the title to Figure 10: “Conceptual Tentative Map for the 340 Portage Avenue
Development”
Correction
6 Chapter 1,
Section 1.1
Text Text modification: “This planning effort was
initiated by Palo Alto Initiated by the City Council
to implement”
Correction/refinement
10 Chapter 1,
Section 1.2
Text Text modification: “… the Cloudera Galactic
Headquarters at 395 Page Mill Road and the
newly constructed building at 3045 Park
Boulevard.”
Correction
15 Chapter 1,
Spotlight: Palo
Alto Cannery
Text Text modification: “The former cannery site was
initially developed in April 1918, by Thomas Foon
Chew, the owner of Bayside Canning Company or
affectionately known in the press at the time as
"tThe aAsparagus kKing ”.

Correction – capitalization
34 Chapter 2,
Section 2.2
Text The NVCAP land use framework is principally
focused on supporting a variety of housing
options, a diverse range of unit sizes and
bedroom configurations, and price points to
support Palo Alto residents at different stages of
life.

Addressing PTC comment received from a Study
Session on May 31, 2023. (PTC Comment #2 in
Attachment F)
36 Chapter 2, Section

2.2 Text Text modifications to the Maximum Height
columns and removal of the additional notes
regarding 100% affordable housing
Reflecting feedback from ARB/PTC and staff on
height limits. Corrections reflecting the changes
to the HIP program for the NVCAP (now
references to 18.14)
47 Chapter 2,
Section 2.4, Table 5
Text For Park Boulevard, Bike Facility is corrected to
“Buffered Separated Bike Lanes”
Correction of the bike facility type for Park
Boulevard
48 Chapter 2,
Section 2.4
Text Text modification: “Vehicles Circulation and
Parking”
Correction
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
88 Packet Pg. 275 of 554

Staff Recommended Modifications to Public Draft NVCAP
Updated: April 2024

Page 3 of 7 ends

Page Chapter/Section Type Staff Recommended Change Reason for Change 74 Chapter 4,
Section 4.3
Figure Corrections on the Figures 56 and 57: For both
Gateway Intersections 2 and 3, the arrows
illustrating the direction of bicycle travel should
be flipped.

Showing the correct directions of bicycle travel
75 Chapter 4,
Section 4.3
Figure For Gateway Intersection 4: Lambert Avenue and
Ash Street, Figure 58 should be modified as
follows:
- Ash Street south of Lambert (near the
existing Boulware Park) is removed and
become green space for the park
- Add sidewalk along southside of Lambert
Avenue (abutting Boulward Park)
- Remove the sidewalk crossing and along
the Matadero Creek along existing Ash
Street
Making the Gateway Intersection concept
consistent with the Boulware Park and Birch
Street Property Renovation Project.
75 Chapter 4,
Section 4.3
Figure For Gateway Intersection 5, Park Boulevard and
Portage Avenue, Figure 59 should be modified as
follows:
- Show separated bike lanes, not buffered.
- Remove bike box
Making the bike facility consistent with Chapter 2
of the NVCAP . Internal discussion identified the
bike box would not be appropriate for this
particular location.
76 Chapter 4,
Section 4.3
Text For Gateway Intersection 5 (Park Boulevard and
Portage Avenue): remove the following text: “A
bike box on the northbound leg of Park
Boulevard will provide a space for bicyclists to
turn left onto the woonerf. “North Ventura”
gateway signage should be installed at the
entrance to the woonerf.”
Internal discussion identified that the bike box
would not be appropriate for this particular
location.
80 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Park
Boulevard)
Text Add the following text: “4-4.5 Feet” to Table 7
Landscape/Furniture Zone row
Internal discussion identified that the bike
facilities need to be corrected to buffered bike
lanes, and would need a little more than 2’ buffer
shown in the section. Accommodating additional
distance that may be needed for the separated
bike lane.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
89 Packet Pg. 276 of 554

Staff Recommended Modifications to Public Draft NVCAP
Updated: April 2024

Page 4 of 7 ends

Page Chapter/Section Type Staff Recommended Change Reason for Change 80 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Park
Boulevard)
Figure Modify Figure 60 to show separated bike lane
with bollards or plants
Making the bike facility consistent with Chapter 2
of the NVCAP
82 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Olive
Avenue)
Text Text modification for Frontage/Setback row for
Olive Ave Street Design between Park Boulevard
and Ash Street: “Southern Edge: 12.5 10 Feet
from Property Line”

Text modification for Frontage/Setback row for
Olive Ave Street Design between Ash Street and
El Camino Real: “Northern Edge: 12.5 10 Feet
from Property Line
Southern Edge: 10 Feet from Property Line”
Reflection changes to the zoning ordinance per
ARB comments (no more than 10 feet for any
street yard setback)
82 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Olive
Avenue)
Figure Modify Figures 61 and 62 to show setback
distance from 12.5’ to 10’
Reflection changes to the zoning ordinance per
ARB comments (no more than 10 feet for any
street yard setback)
82 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Ash
Street)
Figure Flip the Figure 63 to have the shared path on the eastern edge
The direction of travel for bicycles and the
proposed changes to the street sections requires
a change in the location of the shared path
89 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Pepper
Avenue)
Figure Modify Figure 66 to:
- Change the distance of tree bed to 4.5’
for both side of the street
- Change the distance for clear walkway to
5 feet (from a total of 9’ – 4.5’ + 3.5’) for
both side of the street
Minimizing interruption to the private street and
making the sidewalk (clear walkway) at its
minimum at 5 feet (ADA requirement). The
distance for tree beds have been changed to 4.5
feet to accommodate the change.
88 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Pepper
Avenue)
Text Modify Table 11 to:
- Change the frontage/setback to 10’
- Change the pedestrian clear zone to 5’
- Change the landscape/furniture zone to

4.5 feet for both northern/southern
edge
94 Chapter 4, Text Modify Landscape/Furniture Zone row of Table 13 to 9.5 feet from 7.5 feet
Correcting the landscape/furniture zone distance
to ensure the total street width is 27.5 feet
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
90 Packet Pg. 277 of 554

Staff Recommended Modifications to Public Draft NVCAP
Updated: April 2024

Page 5 of 7 ends

Page Chapter/Section Type Staff Recommended Change Reason for Change Section 4.4
(Lambert Avenue)
94 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4
(Lambert Avenue)
Figure Modify Figure 70 to show the clear walkway
distance to 8 feet (from 10 feet) and the tree bed
distance to 9.5 feet (from 7.5 feet)
Correcting distances to ensure the total street
width is 27.5 feet
95 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (El
Camino Real)
Figure Modify Figure 71 to replace tree bed with tree
grate without grass, similar to South El Camino
Real Design Guidelines, Page 24
Making El Camino Real consistent with other
sections
95 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (El
Camino Real)
Text Text modification for Frontage/Setback row:

Minimum 5 Feet
Maximum 10 Feet
0 - 10 feet to create an 8 - 12-foot effective
sidewalk width
Making consistent with the current El Camino
Real street yard setback and making it consistent
with the proposed NVCAP zoning ordinance
information
96 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Page
Mill Road)
Text Text modification for Frontage/Setback row:

Minimum 5 Feet
Maximum 10 Feet
0 - 10 feet to create an 8 - 12-foot effective
sidewalk width
Making it consistent with the proposed NVCAP
zoning ordinance information
96 Chapter 4,
Section 4.4 (Page
Mill Road)
Figure Flip Figure 72 to have the building on the right side
The street section illustration is showing the
flipped image of the actual conditions (building
on the right side)
102 Chapter 4, Section

4.6 Text Add the following text to 4.6.3:
“No more than 10 percent of new surface
parking shall be allowed within the plan area.

Where new buildings are not proposed, existing
surface parking spaces can remain to support
remaining commercial offices.”
While discouraging surface parking within the
plan area, providing some flexibility
117 Chapter 6,
Section 6.1
Figure The 55 feet height area on the Portage Avenue
side of the block between Ash Street, Lambert
Avenue, and Park Boulevard to be removed
The height area with 55’ height limit is a NV-PF
zone. It is reflecting the maximum height limit for
100% affordable housing projects in NV-PF zone.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
91 Packet Pg. 278 of 554

Staff Recommended Modifications to Public Draft NVCAP
Updated: April 2024

Page 6 of 7 ends

Page Chapter/Section Type Staff Recommended Change Reason for Change 117 Chapter 6,
Section 6.1
Figure Reflect the height increase:
- 35’ between Olive Ave and Portage Ave
to 45’
- 45’ to 55’
- 55’ to 65’
- Remove 55’ block abutting near the
green park area
Modified to accommodate the ARB feedback
(which had higher height for NV-R3 and NV-
MXM) but reduced to the staff recommended
changes to minimize impact to the abutting low
density residential areas.
72 Chapter 4,
Section 4.3
Text Add the following text to the past paragraph on
page 72:
“The NVCAP prioritizes well-designed gateway
intersections, but acknowledges specific design
details will be subject to future City-led efforts,
ensuring flexibility and integration with evolving
needs. Broader and more comprehensive
analyses and engineering of gateway
intersections is required to finalize design
recommendations. This includes, but may not be
limited to, an Intersection Safety and
Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) to
identify the optimal design strategies for
intersection types, geometry, and traffic control
at gateway intersections.”
Modification to address a comment from
Caltrans on the Draft SEIR (Comment B.2)
43,
51,
and
107
Figure 36, Figure
42, and Figure 75
Figure Modified figure to show one creek crossing Modifications to address a comment from Santa Clara Valley Water District on the Draft SEIR
(Comment D.19)
108 Chapter 5,
Section 5.1
Text Add the following text to Guidelines 5.1.7:
“5.1.7 Native Plantings
Where possible, pollinator friendly native plants
should be incorporated. Refer to Valley Water’s
Guidelines & Standards for Land Use Near
Streams Chapter 4 (Design Guides for Guidelines
Modification to address a comment from Santa
Clara Valley Water District on the Draft SEIR
(Comment D.22)
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
92 Packet Pg. 279 of 554

Staff Recommended Modifications to Public Draft NVCAP
Updated: April 2024

Page 7 of 7 ends

Page Chapter/Section Type Staff Recommended Change Reason for Change and Standards) for the placement of native
plants along the creek.”
112 Chapter 5
Section 5.2
Text Modify the Standard 5.2.7 language:
“5.2.7 Floodwalls or Retaining Walls
Concrete floodwalls or retaining walls shall be
designed to allow for vegetation to the extent
feasible.”
Modification to address a comment from Santa
Clara Valley Water District on the Draft SEIR
(Comment D.24)
42-43 Chapter 2,
Section 2.4
Figure Figure updated to reflect the correct ½ mile
buffer on the map
Removed other buffers for clarity and corrected
the ½ mile buffer

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
93 Packet Pg. 280 of 554

North V entura
Coordinated Area Plan
Draft Plan: March 2024
June 2024 Clean Version
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
94 Packet Pg. 281 of 554

North Ventura
Coordinated Area Plan
Acknowledgments
City staff along Working Group members and consultants started working on the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) in 2018. Thanks to all the Working Group members, City Council, boards and commission members, and members of the public who contributed their expertise, guidance, ideas, and feedback towards this Plan. Staff looks forward to working together on the implementation of this Plan.

NVCAP WORKING GROUP MEMBERS
Angela Dellaporta (Co Chair) G ail Price (Co Chair) Kir sten Flynn Terry Holzemer Heather Rosen Lund Smith
Yunan Song Tim Steele Siyi Zhang
Alexander Lew Keith Reckdahl Doria Summa
Waldemar Kaczmarski L akiba Pittman

CORE TEAM
Jonathan Lait Dir ector of Planning and Development Services Kelly Cha S enior Planner, Project Manager, Planning and Development Services Coleman Frick Princ ipal Planner, Planning and Development Services Claire Raybould Princ ipal Planner, Planning and Development Services Chitra Moitra Planner , Planning and Development Services Sylvia Star-Lack T ransportation Planning Manager, Office of Transportation Shrupath Pate T ransportation Planner, Office of Transportation Charlie Coles S enior Transportation Planner, Office of Transportation Jessica Setiawan S enior Business Analyst, Planning and Development Services Rachael Tanner A ssitant Director, Planning and Development Services (former) Clare Campbell L ong-Range Planning Manager, Planning and Development Services (former) Elena Lee Pr oject Manager, Planning and Development Services (former) Sheldon S. Ah Sing Pr oject Manager, Planning and Development Services (former)

SPECIAL THANKS TO SPECIAL THANKS TO
The City’s North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan was made possible with funding provided by Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)’s Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grant and private funds from Sobrato Organization.

CONSULTANT AND CONTRIBUTORS
Perkins & Will, Primary Consultant
Arup, Mobility
Strategic Economics, Economic Study
BKF, Infrastructure
Plan to Place, Engagement
WRA, Environmental Consultants, Matadero Creek Study
Page & Turnbull, Historic Preservation Consultants
David J Powers and Associates, Environmental Consultants and Planners Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
95 Packet Pg. 282 of 554

Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
4CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 The C ontext

1.2 The Plan Ar ea

1.3 The Pr oject Goals

1.4 The Pr oject Objectives

1.5 Cit ywide Planning

1.6 R egional and Statewide Planning

1.7 The C ommunity Process
28 114
CHAPTER 2: THE VISION

2.1 Pr eferred Plan

2.2 L and Use

2.3 Gr ound Floor Edges

2.4 Mobility

2.5 E cology and Sustainability

2.6 Urb an Form
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM

3.1 Side walk Zone

3.2 Traffic Lanes and Intersections

3.3 Green Infrastructure

3.4 Paving

3.5 Ext erior Lighting

3.6 Wayfinding

3.7 P ublic Art
56 126
68 CHAPTER 5: PARKS

5.1 P ublic Park

5.2 Mat adero Creek
CHAPTER 6: BUILDINGS

6.1 Building Heigh ts and Massing

6.2 R etail and Active Frontages

6.3 P ortage Avenue Frontages

6.4 R esidential Frontages

6.5 Sust ainable Design
CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION

7.1 De velopment Standards

7.2 R eview Process

7.3 Implementation Actions

7.4 F unding and Financing Strategy
CHAPTER 4: STREETS

4.1 P edestrian Realm

4.2 Bik e Network

4.3 Gateway Intersections

4.4 Str eet Sections

4.5 T ransit Access

4.6 V ehicle Circulation and Parking

4.7 T ransportation Demand
Management

APPENDIX
A1 Exist ing Conditions Memo
A2 Traffic Modelling
104
v North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan vi
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
96 Packet Pg. 283 of 554

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Figures
Figure 1 Pho tograph of architect Mike Lyzwa hold-
ing a model of a proposed building at the
intersection of Page Mill Road and Park
Boulevard, circa 1984, xii. Credit: Palo Alto
Historical Association.

Figure 2 Pho tograph of the Cannery monitor roof
supergraphic on the former Fry’s site, 3.

Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 3 Bir d’s eye photograph of the NVCAP
Plan Area circa 1957, 4. Credit: Palo Alto
Historical Association.

Figure 4 Priorit y Development Areas (PDA) in the
Bay Area, 7.

Figure 5 Mat adero Creek Existing Conditions, 8.

Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 6 F ormer Cannery Building Existing
Conditions, 8. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 7 Exist ing Conditions of the NVCAP
Plan Area, 9.

Figure 8 Exist ing Zoning Districts of the NVCAP, 11.

Figure 9 Pho tographs of recent development,

12. Credit: Premier Properties, Level 10
Construction.

Figure 10 Concep tual Tentative Map for the 340
Portage Avenue Development
Figure 11 19 41 aerial photograph of the Sutter
Packing Company. Credit: Fairchild
Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92,
Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by
Page & Turnbull, 14.

Figure 12 G abled addition attached to the
southernmost monitor roof of 340 Portage
Avenue. View northeast. Credit: Page &
Turnbull, 14.

Figure 13 A p ortion of the southwest facade of the
former office building. Credit: Page &
Turnbull, 15.

Figure 14 Thomas F oon Chew with two foremen at
his canning plant in Alviso. Credit: Our
Town of Palo Alto, 15.

Figure 15 Sut ter Packing Plant, 1940. Credit: Palo Alto Historical Association, 15.

Figure 16 An illustr ative example of low-cost buffered bike lanes and intersection improvements,

17. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 17 Building 0 in S an Francisco, CA, an
example of mixed-income multi-family
apartments next to a public park, 17. Credit:

Perkins&Will
Figure 18 A br eakout discussion during the NVCAP
working group meeting, 19. Credit: City of
Palo Alto
Figure 19 D ocumenting feedback during a working
group design charrette, 19. Credit:

Perkins&Will
Figure 20 A w orksession during the NVCAP working
group meeting, 24. Credit: City of Palo Alto
Figure 21 A sk etching session and report back during
the NVCAP working group meeting, 26.

Credit: City of Palo Alto
Figure 22 A pr esentation during a community
workshop, 27. Credit: Perkins&Will
CHAPTER 2: THE VISION
Figure 23 The NV CAP Preferred Plan, 30.

Figure 24 NV CAP Land Use Framework, 32.

Figure 25 Ex ample of High-Density Mixed Use
Development in Palo Alto, 34 Credit:

Steinberg Architects
Figure 26 Ex ample of Medium Density Mixed Use
Development in Palo Alto, 34. Credit: BDE
Architecture
Figure 27 Ex ample of Low-Density Mixed Use
Development, 35 Credit: WHA
Figure 28 Ex ample of High-Density Residential
Development in Palo Alto, 35 Credit: Redfin
Figure 29 Ex ample of Medium Density Residential
Development in Palo Alto, 35. Credit:

Compass
Figure 30 Ex ample of Low-Density Resident
Development, 35 Credit: Google
Figure 31 The Clo udera Galactic HQ is located at 395
Page Mill Road, 36. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 32 NV CAP Ground Floor Edges Framework, 38.

Figure 33 Building lobbie s and other accessory
spaces to residential uses are considered
active uses, 40. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 34 Neighb orhood-serving retail along major
boulevards like El Camino Real, 41. Credit:

Bruce Damonte
Figure 35 R esidential stoops should be set back and
elevated to provide privacy for residents,

41. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 36 NV CAP Mobility Framework, 42.

Figure 37 NV CAP Pedestrian Network, 44.

Figure 38 Vie w of the Bell Street Woonerf in Seattle,
Washington, 45. Credit: Puget Sound
Business Journal
Figure 39 Bik e Facility Degree of Separation, 46.

Figure 40 NV CAP Bike Network Framework, 47.

Figure 41 NV CAP Vehicle and Parking Framework, 49.

Figure 42 NV CAP Ecology and Sustainability
Framework, 50.

Figure 43 A concep tual design for the future Public
park, 52.

Figure 44 An e xample of a restored creek in San Luis
Obispo, CA, 53. Credit: Food and Wine
Safari
Figure 45 An e xample of green infrastructure
integrated with street furnishings, 53.

Credit: AJ Landskap
Figure 46 NV CAP Urban Form Framework , 5 4.

Figure 47 In ternal streets have height allowances
that are conducive with missing middle
housing like townhomes, 56.

Credit: Perkins&Will
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM
Figure 48 The Side walk Zone, 58.

Figure 49 Bior etention, 61. Credit: City of Palo Alto
Figure 50 D ark sky compliant exterior light fixtures
helps mitigate light pollution and the
health of both humans and wildlife, 62.

Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare.

Figure 51 D ark sky compliant exterior light fixtures
helps mitigate light pollution and the
health of both humans and wildlife, 63.

Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare.

Figure 52 Neighb orhood map and directional
signage are effective wayfinding tools for
visitors to the NVCAP, 64.

Figure 53 An e xample of a recent public art installa-
tion, 65. Credit: Passages by Susan Zocco-
la.
vii North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan viii
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
97 Packet Pg. 284 of 554

CHAPTER 4: STREETS
Figures
CHAPTER 5: PARKS
CHAPTER 6: BUILDINGS
CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION
Figure 54 Map o f Conceptual Gateway Intersection
Design Improvements, 72.

Figure 55 El Camino R eal and Page Mill Road Con-
ceptual Intersection Design, 73.

Figure 56 El Camino R eal and Olive Avenue Concep-
tual Intersection Design,74.

Figure 57 El Camino R eal, Hansen Way, Portage Ave-
nue Conceptual Intersection Design, 75.

Figure 58 L ambert Avenue and Ash Street Conceptu-
al Intersection Design, 76.

Figure 59 P ark Boulevard and Portage Avenue Con-
ceptual Intersection Design, 77.

Figure 60 T ypical Park Boulevard Section, 81.

Figure 61 T ypical Olive Avenue section between Park
Boulevard and Ash Street, 83.

Figure 62 T ypical Olive Avenue section between Ash
Street and El Camino Real, 83.

Figure 63 T ypical Ash Street section between Page
Mill Road and Olive Avenue, 85.

Figure 64 T ypical Ash Street section between Acacia
Avenue and Lambert Avenue, 85.

Figure 65 T ypical Acacia Avenue Section, 87.

Figure 66 T ypical Pepper Avenue Section, 89.

Figure 67 T ypical Portage Avenue section between
Park Boulevard and Ash Street, 91.

Figure 68 T ypical Portage Avenue section between
Ash Street and El Camino Real, 91,
Figure 69 Str eetscape elements like double row
of trees, textured pavement, pedestrian
scale lighting , and seating encourages
a low-carbon, welcoming neighborhood
environment, 93. Credit: SWA
Figure 70 T ypical Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone
Section, 94.

Figure 71 T ypical El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone
Section, 95.

Figure 72 T ypical Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone
Section, 96.

Figure 73 T ypical mid-block connetion section, 99.

Figure 74 T ypical rear setback connection section, 99.

Figure 75 L ocation of Park Gateways and Circulation
Paths, 107.

Figure 76 An e xample of passive park programming,
109. Credit: Jennifer Tyner
Figure 77 An e xample of active park programming,
109. Credit: Daggett
Figure 78 The lo cation of the Matadero Creek buffer,
circulation, and gateways, 111.

Figure 79 The Mat adero Creek Channel is currently a
constrained concrete trapezoidal channel.,
112. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 80 A natur alized creek has the opportunity to
provide multi-use trails and habitat areas,
113. Credit: Food and Wine Safari
Figure 81 An e xample of a daylight plane
requirement for mixed-use development
stepping down to single family residential
neighborhoods, 116.

Figure 82 Allo wable Height Map, 117.

Figure 83 R etail ground floor provide adequate
floor to ceiling heights, transparency, and
signage, 118. Credit: David Baker Architects
Figure 84 Gr ound floors can create notches of
outdoor rooms to allow for lively spillover
of retail, 119 Credit: Bruce Damonte
Figure 85 A ctive ground floors provide openness,
transparency and a connection to the
street, 119 Credit: David Baker Architects
Figure 86 Gr ound floors treatments can emulate the
materiality, fenestration, and roof datum of
historic structures, 120. Credit: Connect CRA
Figure 87 Gr ound floor residential stoops can provide
privacy for residents, neighborhood
beautification, and stormwater
management, 121. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 88 Buidling r oofs can be multi-purpose,
including providing additional outdoor
space for residents, 124. Credit: Kirstin
Bucher
Figure 89 Visible elemen ts of sustainability can
include design features such as celebrating
secure bike parking, 125. Credit: Nelson /
Nygaard
Figure 90 NV CAP Zoning Map, as of March 2024, 129.
ix North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan x
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
98 Packet Pg. 285 of 554

Tables
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Table 1 Hist orical Population and Growth in Palo
Alto, 1980 - 2040, 7.

Table 2 Exist ing Zoning Designations, 10.

Table 3 Exist ing and Future Development Potential
by Land Use, 32.

Table 4 Pr oposed NVCAP Development Standards,

36. Table 5 Bicycle Facility Classifications, 47.

CHAPTER 2: THE VISION
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM
Table 6 Allo wed Features by Sidewalk Zone, 58.

CHAPTER 4: STREETS
Table 7 P ark Boulevard Street Design, 80.

Table 8 Oliv e Avenue Street Design, 82.

Table 9 A sh Street Street Design, 84.

Table 10 Acac ia Avenue Street Design, 86.

Table 11 P epper Avenue Street Design, 88.

Table 12 P ortage Avenue Street Design, 90.

Table 13 L ambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Design, 94.

Table 14 El C amino Real Sidewalk Zone Design, 95.

Table 15 P age Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Design, 96.

Table 16 Mid-Blo ck Paseo Design, 98.

Table 17 R ear Setback Pathway Design, 98.

Table 18 TDM Str ategy Menu, 104.

CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION
Table 19 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP , 130.

Table 19 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP
(Continued), 132.

Table 20 F unding Source Categories and Examples,
135.

Table 21 Ex amples of Potential Regional or County
Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP
Improvements, 136.

Table 22 Ex amples of Potential State Grant Funding
Sources for NVCAP Improvements, 138.

Table 22 Ex amples of Potential State Grant
Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements
(Continued), 140.

Table 23 Ex amples of Potential Federal Grant
Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements,
140.

Table 24 Summar y of Major District-Based Value
Capture Tools, 142.

Table 25 Infrastructure Improvements and
Applicable Funding Sources in the NVCAP,
144.
xi North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan xii
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
99 Packet Pg. 286 of 554

The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
(NVCAP) represents a rare opportunity within
the City of Palo Alto to plan proactively for a
transit-oriented, mixed-use, mixed-income,
and walkable neighborhood. The NVCAP sets
forth a vision that:
• Honors the storied history and unique character of the North Ventura neighborhood;
• Understands the needs of current residents and puts forward near-term solutions to current challenges;
• Establishes a long-term framework for desired growth so that more people can call North Ventura home; and
• Invests in community infrastructure to support an equitable, resilient, and sustainable Palo Alto.

Executive Summary
NVCAP is aligned with the goals and policies embedded in the adopted City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan, addressing the eight major themes: Building Community and Neighborhoods; Maintaining and Enhancing Community Character; Reducing Reliance on the Automobile; Meeting Housing Supply Challenges; Protecting and Sustaining the Natural Environment; Keeping Palo Alto Prepared for Future Natural and Human-Caused Hazards; Meeting Residential and Commercial Needs; and Providing Responsive Governance and Regional Leadership.

Finally, this is a vision shaped by the Palo Alto community. This Plan would not be possible without the guidance of stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and other community members, who graciously volunteered their time as members of the Working Group to thoughtfully consider the challenges and opportunities of the Plan.

Figure 1 Photograph of architect Mike Lyzwa holding a model of a proposed building at the intersection of Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard, circa 1984.
xiii North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 1
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
100

Packet Pg. 287 of 554

Plan Organization
The plan document is organized
as follows:

Introduction provides an overview of the NVCAP
physical and regulatory context. The Plan is
shaped by the project goals and objectives,
adopted and in-progress City plans and policies,
recently enacted regional and state laws, and the
comprehensive community planning process.

The Vision provides an overview of the vision
for the future of NVCAP built and natural
environment. This includes urban design
frameworks that calibrate the optimal mix of
uses; support a multi-modal mobility framework
within the neighborhood and how it connects
to the rest of the city and the region; foster
a regenerative and ecological framework to
support the health of humans and wildlife while
supporting the implementation of City’s Climate
Action Plan; and the neighborhood’s context-
specific urban form.

Design Standards and Guidelines (Public
Realm, Streets, Parks, Buildings) include
requirements that govern the construction
and modification of horizontal and vertical
development, standards are quantifiable,
whereas guidelines are qualitative requirements.

Implementation outlines the necessary steps to
fulfill the vision of the Plan, including funding and
financing strategies, infrastructure improvements,
and capital investments.

Appendix contains information for reference
used to generate the NVCAP including existing
site conditions, market studies, and infrastructure
analysis.

Figure 2 Photograph of the Cannery monitor roof supergraphic on the former Fry’s site, 2022 Credit: Perkins&Will
2 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 3
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
101

Packet Pg. 288 of 554

1.1 C ontext

1.2 Plan Ar ea

1.3 Pr oject Goals

1.4 Pr oject Objectives

1.5 Cit ywide Planning

1.6 R egional and Statewide Planning

1.7 C ommunity Process
Introduction
1 Figure 3 Bird’s eye photograph of the NVCAP Plan
Area circa 1957.

Matadero Creek Sutter Packing Plant
Park Boulevard
El Camino Real
Southern Pacific Railroad
Stanford Industrial Park
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
102

Packet Pg. 289 of 554

1 .1
Context
The purpose of the NVCAP is to capture the City’s vision for the North Ventura neighborhood into a regulatory document that will guide the future development of the 60-acre plan area, including land use, development standards, and design guidelines.

Initiated by the City Council to implement
Comprehensive Plan Program L-4.10, wh
ich states the following,
Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan
for the North Ventura area and
surrounding California Avenue area.

The Plan should describe a vision for
the future of the North Ventura area as
a walkable neighborhood with multi-
family housing, ground-floor retail, a
public park, creek improvements, and
an interconnected street grid. It should
guide the development of the California
Avenue area as a well-designed mixed-
use district with diverse land uses and a
network of pedestrian-oriented streets.

The NVCAP aligns with the Comprehensive Plan
policy, however, the Plan Area focuses solely on
the North Ventura neighborhood.

On November 6, 2017, the City Council adopted
Resolution 9717, authorizing the filing of an
application to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission for a Priority Development Area
Grant for the North Ventura Coordinated Area
Plan. The Council expressed local support and
commitment of necessary matching funds and
assurance of the completion of the project.

City Policies
The Region
The Bay Area is expected to be home to an
additional 1.4 million households by 2050. It
is essential that housing, transportation, and
other types of land uses work together – as
part of a regional growth framework – create
an equitable, prosperous future for all Bay Area
communities and make the best use of available
resources. Priority Development Areas (PDA) are
a key piece of the Bay Area’s regional growth
framework.

Approximately 70% of the Plan Area is located
within the California Avenue PDA, which was
selected as a PDA based on excellent access to
transit, the proximity of the existing California
Avenue Business District, and the availability of
underutilized parcels of land.

Figure 4 Priority Development Areas (PDA)
in the Bay Area
Palo Alto Growth Projections
According to the City’s Housing Element Update,
the total population is projected to grow to
82,835 people by 2030 and 86,510 people by
2040.

Historically, the number of new homes built in
the Bay Area has not kept pace with demand,
resulting in longer commutes, increasing prices,
and exacerbating issues of displacement and
homelessness. The number of new homes in Palo
Alto increased 3.8 percent from 2010 to 2020,
which is below the growth rate for Santa Clara
County and below the growth rate of the region’s
housing stock during this time period. At the
same time, Palo Alto’s population increased 6
percent.

Table 1 Historical Population and Growth
in Palo Alto, 1980 - 2040
Sources: U.S. Census 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, California Department of Finance 2021 and ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040 Projections
* Projections
Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.7: Use
coordinated area plan to guide
development
Comprehensive Plan (Program
L-4.10.1): Prepare a coordinated area
plan for the North Ventura area and
surrounding California Avenue area.

On November 6, 2017, the City Council
adopted a Resolution expressing
local support and commitment for the
preparation of the NVCAP.

Year Population Numerical
Change
Percent
Change
1980 55,225 741 1%
1990 55,900 675 1%
2000 58,598 2,698 5%
2010 64,403 5,805 10%
2020 68,145 3,254 6%
2030* 82,835* 15,178* 22%*
2040* 86,510* 3,675* 4%*
California Avenue PDA

INTRODUCTION
6 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 7
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
103

Packet Pg. 290 of 554

For more information and history of the Palo
Alto Cannery, go to:

The Palo Alto Cannery Spotlight, Pages 14-15
Cloudera Galactic HQ
The Cannery
Matadero Creek Channel
California Avenue Caltrain Station
Boulware Park
Park Plaza Apartments
Cannery Office Building
Navan
Plan Area
The NVCAP plan area is approximately 60 acres, roughly bounded by Oregon Expressway / Page Mill Road to the north, El Camino Real to the west, Lambert Avenue to the south, and the Caltrain rail corridor to the east. Nearby neighborhoods include the Evergreen neighborhood to the west, the Midtown neighborhood to the north, and Barron Park to the south.

Figure 7 Existing Conditions of the NVCAP Plan Area, 2020

1.2 Proximity to City Destinations
The plan area is within walking and biking
distance to several key destinations, including:
• The California Avenue Caltrain Station, which
is within a half mile of the plan area. Walking
access to the station is primarily along Park
Boulevard, a designated Bike Boulevard.
• El Camino Real, a regional commercial and
retail corridor. Opportunities for pedestrians
and bicyclists to cross Page Mill Road safely are
limited.
• California Avenue, a regional retail attraction
and social destination for the peninsula.
• Stanford University, one of the premier higher-
education institutions in the world.
• Stanford Research Park and California Avenue
Business District, accounting for almost 40% of
the City’s employment distribution.
• Signature Palo Alto open spaces such as Sarah
Wallis Park, Boulware Park, and J. Bowden Park.

Plan Area Notable Sites
Notable sites within the plan area include the
Matadero Creek Channel and the buildings
associated with the Cannery.

The portion of the Matadero Creek running
through the plan area is contained with a concrete
trapezoidal channel, which was built in 1990 from
El Camino Real to the Caltrain Tracks.

Figure 5 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a
constrained concrete trapezoidal channel.

Figure 6 The former Cannery building site is 12.5
acres and located at the heart of the
NVCAP.

INTRODUCTION
Project Boundary
Caltrain Station
Bus Stops
Traffic Signals
Existing Sidewalks
Major External Connections
Surface Parking
Parks
8 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 9
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
104

Packet Pg. 291 of 554

Figure 8 Existing Zoning Districts of the NVCAP
ROLM
GM
GM
GM
CS
CS
CS
CS
R-1
R-1
RM-30
RM-30
RM-30
PC
Land Use and Zoning
The North Ventura neighborhood is already
made up of a mix of multi-family and single-
family residential, office, service, and retail
uses. Service commercial uses are concentrated
along El Camino Real, Lambert Avenue, and
the southern segment of Portage Avenue.

Additionally, office uses are located primarily
along Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard,
the most notable anchors being the Cloudera
Galactic Headquarters at 395 Page Mill Road
and the newly constructed building at 3045 Park
Boulevard.

About 70% of residential units in North Ventura
are single-family detached homes, most built
before 1950. Single-family homes occupy about
10 percent of the Plan Area and are generally
found along Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue.

The Park Plaza Apartments is the most notable
multi-family residential development within
the Plan Area, situated at the corner of Park
Boulevard and Page Mill Road.

1.2 Table 2 Existing Zoning Designations
Zoning Map
Designation District Name
R-1 Single-family residence district
RM-30 Medium density multiple-family residence district CS Service commercial district
ROLM Research, office and limited manufacturing district GM General manufacturing district
CN Neighborhood commercial district
PC Planned community district

INTRODUCTION
10 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 11
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
105

Packet Pg. 292 of 554

Recent Development
The Plan Area is experiencing significant change
and new investment in mixed-use development.

A few new developments include:

Under Construction or Completed
441 Page Mill Road: a three-story mixed use
building with one level of underground parking.

The project includes Class-A office space, ground
floor retail, and 16 apartments.
3045 Park Boulevard: a two-story shell
commercial building with underground parking.
3225 El Camino Real: a mixed-use development
with two distinct buildings. The first building
is four stories with ground floor retail and
apartments/condos on the upper floors. The
second building is two stories with ground
floor retail and office on the upper floor. The
development includes underground and podium
parking.

The 340 Portage Avenue
Development Agreement
In October 2023, the City approved a
development agreement with the Sobrato
Organization, LLC for the redevelopment of the

14.65-acre site at 200-404 Portage Avenue,
3040-3250 Park Boulevard, 3201-3225 Ash Street
and 278 Lambert Avenue (Ordinance #5595).

The project site, comprised of five reconfigured
parcels, is located centrally within the boundary
of the NVCAP. The development agreement
includes:
• Partial demolition of a commercial building
(formerly Bayside Cannery) deemed eligible for
the California Register of Historical Resources
and retrofit of the remaining portion of the
building (340-404 Portage) to retain and restore
key historic features (Parcel 1)
• Construction of (74) new three-story townhome
condominiums replacing approximately 84,000
square feet (sf) of the historic cannery building
at 200-404 Portage Avenue (Parcel 1)
• Demolition of a building containing commercial
recreation use at 3040 Park Boulevard (Parcel 1)
• Dedication of approximately 3.25 acres
of land to the City for future affordable
housing (approximately 1 acre) and parkland
(approximately 2.25 acres) uses (Parcel 2)

1.2 Figure 9 Photographs of recent development

INTRODUCTION
• Retention of existing research and development
(R&D) uses in the remaining portion of the
former cannery building (Parcel 3)
• Construction of a two-level parking garage
(Parcel 3)
• Retention of office use in the existing building at
3201-3225 Ash Street (Parcel 4)
• Conversion of automotive use at 3250 Park
Boulevard to R&D use (Parcel 5)
• Contribution of $5 million for future park
improvements and contributions to the City’s
affordable housing fund.
• Development of a Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) program for the R&D and
office uses.

When the terms of the agreement end,
conformance with the NVCAP will be required of
all new projects in the affected area.

Figure 10 Conceptual Tentative Map for the 340 Portage Avenue Development 12 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 13
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
106

Packet Pg. 293 of 554

Spotlight:

Palo Alto Cannery
Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue
Draft Palo Alto, California

April 11, 2019 - 31 - Page & Turnbull, Inc.

Figure 73: 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing Company. Subject property outlined in orange. Office building outlined in blue. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by Page & Turnbull.

Figure 72. Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association.

Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue
Draft Palo Alto, California

April 11, 2019 - 38 - Page & Turnbull, Inc.

1972 Bemiss & Jason Corp, shipping, receiving, paper products manufacturing
300 Portage Avenue
1962 Tubes & Cores Inc, paper products
1976 Ceilcote Company Inc, distribution office
303 Portage Avenue
1961-1965 Advance Transformer Co
1961-1976 James R W Packaging, packing, crating, and shipping 340 Portage Avenue
1985 Basket Galleria, Inc.
ca. 1990-Present Fry’s Electronics
370 Portage Avenue
2002-2004 Lyncean Technologies
380 Portage Avenue
2006 Danger, Inc.
2016 – Present: Playground Global, technology

Select Owner and Occupant Biographies
The following biographies have been researched for longer-term owners and occupants.

Thomas Foon Chew (1887-1931) and the Bayside Canning Company (1918-1936) Thomas Foon Chew was born in
China around 1887, likely in the
Loong Kai District of Guangdong
Province, and became one of the
richest and most influential Chinese-
Americans in California. His father,
Sai Yen Chew, emigrated to San
Francisco when Thomas was a child,
where he founded a small canning
operation, Precinta Canning, around
1890. According to family members,
Chew brought his son, Thomas,
from China to San Francisco
sometime around 1897, where he
gained his first introduction to the
canning business. Precinta Canning
was located near Broadway and
Sansome in San Francisco’s old Chinatown. The small cannery was equipped with a single 40- Figure 76: Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at his
canning plant in Alviso. Source: Our Town of Palo Alto. https://ourtownofpaloalto.wordpress.com/2016/12/30/histor y-of-mayfields-chinatown/
Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue
Draft Palo Alto, California

April 11, 2019 - 31 - Page & Turnbull, Inc.

Figure 73: 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing Company. Subject property outlined in orange. Office building outlined in blue. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by Page & Turnbull.

Figure 72. Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association.

The southeast corner of the parcel
contains a one-story wood frame
building. The building, located on
Ash Street next the former cannery
building, is used as an office. The
building appears to have been initially
built as a dormitory for the cannery
employees sometime between 1918
and 1925 and was moved to its current
location in 1940. The building features
a front-gabled roof, wraparound porch
with a shed roof, and wood lap siding.

Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue
Draft Palo Alto, California

April 11, 2019 - 13 - Page & Turnbull, Inc.

Figure 23. The loading platform or cooling
porch converted into a patio with replacement
aluminum frame garage door window. View
northeast.

Figure 24. Rooftop parapet and small gabled
roof in middle section of northwest façade.

View northeast.

Figure 25. Gabled addition attached to the
southernmost monitor roof of 340 Portage
Avenue. View northeast.

Figure 26. Close-up of the gabled and flat-
roofed additions. View northeast.

Figure 27. A portion of the concrete loading
platform or cooling porch with its shed awning
and wood post-and-beam supports in the
middle section of the northwest façade. View
northeast.

Figure 28. Outlines of shallow gabled roofs are
visible along the concrete platform. View
southeast.

Figure 11 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing
Company. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight
C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara.

Edited by Page & Turnbull.

Figure 12 Gabled addition attached to the southernmost
monitor roof of 340 Portage Avenue. View
northeast. Source: Page & Turnbull
Historic Resource Evaluation 340 Portage Avenue
Draft Palo Alto, California

April 11, 2019 - 20 - Page & Turnbull, Inc.

Figure 57. A portion of the southwest façade of
the former office building. View northeast.

Figure 58. The rear portion of the southwest
façade of the former office building. View
northwest.

SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD
The subject property is located in the Ventura neighborhood, which is surrounded by the Evergreen Park, St. Claire Gardens, Charleston Meadow, Barron Park, Neal, and College Terrace neighborhoods in Palo Alto. The immediate surroundings of the subject property consist of office and commercial buildings, several of which appear to have been influenced by the industrial architecture of the property at 340 Portage Avenue, and parking lots associated with these properties (Figure 59 to Figure 62). Single-family residential buildings along Olive Avenue border the subject property to the west (Figure 63).

Figure 59. A neighboring property on Park
Boulevard to the east of Matadero Creek. View
southeast.

Figure 60. An office building at 3101 Park
Boulevard. View northeast.

The former cannery site was initially
developed in April 1918, by Thomas
Foon Chew, the owner of Bayside
Canning Company or affectionately
known in the press at the time as “The
Asparagus King”. This was intended
to be Mr. Chew’s second cannery; the
first cannery was built nearby in Alviso,
California. The Palo Alto cannery
was strategically located alongside a
railroad spur of the Southern Pacific
Railroad’s Los Gatos branch, which
facilitated shipments, and Matadero
Creek for a ready water supply.

The cannery was expanded over
the next several decades. The site
operated as the Bay Side Cannery and
then as the Sutter Packing Company in
1929. The cannery continued to grow
through World War II and was closed
in 1949.

Although the building has undergone
some exterior alterations throughout
the expansion, aerial photos show
that from 1965, the building continues
to have the same shape and general
form as now. Following the closure of
the cannery, the site has been occupied
by an anchor retailer Maximart and
other retail and office uses. The next
significant and largest tenant, Fry’s
Electronics, continued to occupy the
site until the end of 2019.

Figure 13 A portion of the southwest facade of the former office building. Source: Page & Turnbull
Figure 14 Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at his canning plant in Alviso. Source: Our Town of Palo Alto.

Figure 15 Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association

1.2 INTRODUCTION
Some of the most distinctive features
include the monitor roofs, capped with
composition shingles and clad with
corrugated metal, wood clerestory
ribbon windows and wire glass
skylights.

At the heart of the NVCAP is the 12.5-
acre 340 Portage Avenue property.

What appears to be one large
building on the parcel is composed
of approximately ten buildings that
were constructed at various times
between 1918 and 1949. The building
is surrounded by a narrow parking lot
to the north and a larger parking lot
to the south bounded by Matadero
Creek. The rectangular former cannery
building features walls that are
concrete, corrugated metal or wood
siding, with a variety of roof shapes.
14 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 15
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
107

Packet Pg. 294 of 554

Project Goals
On March 5th, 2018, the City Council approved the following goals to guide the NVCAP. A project goal refers to the desired outcome of a project. The following goals are high-level statements that provide an overall context for the aims and accomplishments of the project.

Housing and Land Use
Add to the City’s supply of multi-family housing,
including market rate, affordable, “missing
middle” and senior housing in a walkable, mixed-
use, transit-accessible neighborhood, with retail
and commercial services, open space, and
possibly arts and entertainment uses.

Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Connections
Create and enhance well-defined connections
to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities,
including connections to the Caltrain Station,
Park Boulevard, and El Camino Real.

Connected Street Grid
Create a connected street grid, filling in sidewalk
gaps and street connections to California Avenue,
the Caltrain Station, and El Camino Real where
appropriate.

Community Facilities and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate development of
new community facilities and infrastructure
with private development, recognizing both the
community’s needs and that such investments
can increase the cost of housing.

Balance of Community Interests
Balance community-wide objectives with the
interests of neighborhood residents and minimize
displacement of existing residents.

Urban Design, Design Guidelines, and
Neighborhood Fabric
Develop human-scale urban design strategies,
and design guidelines that strengthen
and support the neighborhood fabric. Infill
development will respect the scale and character
of the surrounding residential neighborhood.

Sustainability and the Environment
Protect and enhance the environment, while
addressing the principles of sustainability.

1.3 Figure 16 (left) An illustrative example of low-cost buffered bike lanes and intersection improvements.

Figure 17 (top) Building 0 in San Francisco, CA, an example of mixed-income multi-family apartments next to a public park.

Throughout the document, applicable
project goals are included in insets.

INTRODUCTION
16 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 17
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
108

Packet Pg. 295 of 554

Project Objectives
On March 5th, 2018, the City Council approved the following objectives to guide the NVCAP. Project objectives describe the optimal process and set the goalposts for a successful plan. Project objectives are measurable and achievable.

Data-Driven Approach
Employ a data-driven approach that considers
community desires, market conditions and
forecasts, financial feasibility, existing uses and
development patterns, development capacity,
traffic and travel patterns, historic/cultural and
natural resources, need for community facilities
(e.g., schools), and other relevant data to inform
plan policies.

Comprehensive User-Friendly Document and
Implementation
Create a comprehensive but user-friendly
document that identifies the distribution,
location and extent of land uses, planning
policies, development regulations, and design
guidelines to enable development and needed
infrastructure investments in the project area.

Guide and Strategy for Staff and Decision
Makers
Provide a guide and strategy for staff and
decision-makers to bridge the gap between the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
and individual development projects in order to
streamline future land use and transportation
decisions.

Meaningful Community Engagement
Enable a process with meaningful opportunities
for community engagement, within the defined
timeline, and an outcome (the coordinated area
plan document) that reflects the community’s
priorities.

Economic Feasibility
A determination of the economic and fiscal
feasibility of the plan with specific analysis
of marketplace factors and incentives and
disincentives, as well as a cost-benefit analysis of
public infrastructure investments and projected
economic benefits to the City and community.

Environmental
A plan that is protective of public health and a
process that complies with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act.

1.4 Figure 18 (left) A breakout discussion during the NVCAP working group meeting, Figure 19 (top) Documenting feedback during a working group design charrette

INTRODUCTION
18 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 19
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
109

Packet Pg. 296 of 554

Citywide Planning
The standards and guidelines in this document are informed and in conformance with the following foundational city plans and policies. 2030 Comprehensive Plan
The City adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
in November 2017, which is the primary tool
for guiding preservation and development in
Palo Alto. The Plan reflects community values
and provides a collective vision that guides
preservation, growth, and change. The Plan
Area is a part of the California Avenue Multi-
Neighborhood Center. A multi-neighborhood
center is defined as retail shopping centers or
districts that serves more than one neighborhood
with a diverse mix of uses, including retail, service,
office, and residential. Program L-4.10.1 directs
staff to prepare a coordinated area plan for the
North Ventura area and surrounding California
Avenue area. The plan should describe a vision
for the future of the North Ventura area as
a walkable neighborhood with multi-family
housing, ground-floor retail, a public park, creek
improvements, and an interconnected street grid.

It should guide the development of the California
Avenue area as a well-designed mixed-use
district with diverse land uses and a network of
pedestrian-oriented streets.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan
The City adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation Plan in July 2012, which
strategically guides public and private
investments in non-motorized transportation
facilities and related programs. The plan
identifies several streets within the Plan Area as
critical bicycle streets, including Portage Avenue
as an enhanced bikeway as part of the Bay to
Ridge Trail and Park Boulevard as a major north-
south Bicycle Boulevard.

Housing Element 2023-2031
The Housing Element update, one of the
State-mandated components of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan, represents the City of Palo
Alto’s sixth Housing Element and plans for the
years 2023 through 2031. In total, approximately
6,700 housing units are needed to accommodate
the 2023-2031 growth for all income groups as
part of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation
(RHNA) process. The Plan Area includes 15
properties identified by the Housing Element as
opportunity sites that could help the City meet its
housing needs (unit yield of approximately 300).

Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 19.10:

Coordinated Area Plans
This chapter establishes the procedures for the
preparation of coordinated area plans (CAP).

The chapter’s sections outline the purpose of a
CAP, the procedures needed to be performed
throughout the planning process, the contents
of the plan document, and the requirements for
permitting and development once the CAP has
been adopted.

Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.32:

Affordable Housing Incentive Program
The affordable housing incentive program is
intended to promote the development of 100%
affordable rental housing projects located within
one-half mile of a major transit stop or one-
quarter mile of a high-quality transit corridor.

Due to the Plan Area’s proximity to transit
and everyday needs, the NVCAP is a strong
candidate to support the City’s goal of adding
more affordable housing units to support a wider
range of incomes.

1.5 Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24:

Contextual Design Criteria and Objective
Design Standards
To comply with California’s recently adopted
legislation (Senate Bill (SB) 35 and SB 330) to
address the housing shortage within the state,
Palo Alto adopted objective design standards
to review new multi-family and mixed-use
residential housing projects. The development
standards and design guidelines included in
the coordinated area plan are intended to
be complementary to the objective design
standards.

Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and
Recreation Master Plan
Adopted in September 2017, the Parks Master
Plan presents the vision for the future of Palo
Alto’s parks, trails, natural open space, and
recreation system. The plan identifies the entire
Plan Area as an urban canopy target area,
emphasizing the need for new green streets
and parks. Additionally, Policy 1.B.10 states the
following, ‘develop a creek walk along Matadero
Creek that links parks and creates open
space and a habitat corridor’. Finally, the plan
designates Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard
as ‘Pollinator Pathways,’ which are intended
to provide connectivity for natural systems
through the integration of green stormwater
infrastructure. The future public park and the
renaturalization of the creek can serve as an
integral component of the City’s larger regional
habitat connection concept, connecting people
and wildlife from the foothills to the Baylands.

Urban Forest Master Plan
Adopted in February 2019, the Urban Forest
Master Plan establishes long-term management
goals and strategies to foster a sustainable
urban forest in Palo Alto. The urban forest
includes street trees, park trees, forested
parklands, and trees in many private ownership
settings. NVCAP is aligned with the master plan’s
goals and policies including:
• Goal 1: A well-developed contiguous, healthy,
and ecologically resilient citywide urban forest;
and
• Goal 2: Re-generated native woodland and
riparian landscapes as the key ecological
basis of the urban forest with a focus on native
species and habitat.

INTRODUCTION
Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan
Completed in 2019, the Green Stormwater
Infrastructure (GSI) Plan provides a guidance
framework to integrate GSI measures into the
City’s urban landscape to properly manage and
treat stormwater at its source, decreasing water
quality impacts to local creeks, the Baylands,
and the San Francisco Bay. Integration of GSI
measures is critical for the Plan Area to address
the current lack of open spaces, and high
amount of imperviousness. Chapter 4 of the
GSI specifies in the Developed Project Location
Prioritization Criteria, that projects located within
one of the key development areas should receive
a higher priority than projects located outside
one of these areas.

Public Art Master Plan
Completed in November 2016, the mission of
the plan is to ensure that new public art reflects
Palo Alto’s people, diverse neighborhoods, the
innovative and global character of its businesses
and academic institutions, and the beauty of
its natural environment. Several of the plan’s
objectives are applicable to NVCAP including:
• Objective 1: Locate art in unexpected places,
such as alleys to provide an element of surprise
and whimsy to everyday life.
• Objective 2: Integrate impactful, permanently-
sited public art projects in business areas.
• Objective 3: Install public art in neighborhoods
for residents to enjoy on a daily basis.
• Objective 4: Use art to promote environmental
stewardship and sustainability. Create
partnerships with Environmental Services and
local regional agencies to integrate public art
into environmental projects.
• Objective 5: Commission artists or artist/design
teams to create specific public art plans for
areas of Palo Alto where development is taking
place.
20 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 21
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
110

Packet Pg. 297 of 554

Regional and Statewide
Planning
Approximately 70% of the Plan Area is located within the California Avenue PDA, which was selected based on excellent access to transit, the proximity of the existing California Avenue Business District, and the availability of underutilized parcels of land. Therefore, NVCAP is subject to both regional and state legislation, developed and adopted to ensure new development within PDAs are supporting compact, equitable transit-oriented communities.

Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy
Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s)
regional Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC)
policy update seeks to support the region’s transit
investments by creating communities around
transit stations and along transit corridors that
not only support transit ridership, but that are
places where Bay Area residents of all abilities,
and income levels, and racial and ethnic
backgrounds can live, work and access services,
such as education, childcare, and healthcare. The
TOC policies would apply to PDAs that are served
by fixed-guideway transit such as the California
Avenue Station (Caltrain). PDAs that comply with
these TOC policies are eligible for grant funding
administered by the MTC. Jurisdictions adopting
these policies would be required to implement
the following:
• New Residential Development: a minimum
density of 50 units/net acre or higher and an
allowable maximum density of 75 units/net acre
or higher.
• New Commercial Office Development: a
minimum density of 2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) or
higher and an allowable maximum density of 4
FAR or higher.
• Parking Management Requirements: no
minimum parking requirement allowed.

At the time of plan adoption, the City has not
adopted the TOC policy.

Assembly Bill 2097 (AB2097)
The California State Legislature passed, and the
Governor signed, Assembly Bill (AB) 2097 that
eliminates minimum parking requirements for all
uses/development, (except hotels) within a half-
mile of public transit. This bill affects all properties within the NVCAP. The new requirements went
into effect on January 1, 2023, ahead of the
adoption of the NVCAP.

1.5 1.6

INTRODUCTION
Sustainability and Climate Action Plan
Adopted in June 2023, the Sustainability and
Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) is a comprehensive
document laying out the City’s strategy to
achieve ambitious carbon reduction goals,
while improving natural environment, adapting
to climate impacts, and increasing livability for
Palo Alto residents. The S/CAP establishes the
goals of reducing carbon emissions 80 percent
below 1990 levels by 2030 (the “80 x 30” goal)
and achieving carbon neutrality by 2030. Several
of the plan’s goals are applicable to NVCAP
including:
• Energy: Reduce GHG emissions from the direct
use of natural gas in Palo Alto’s building sector
by at least 60% below 1990 levels (116,400 MT
CO2e reduction)
• Mobility: Reduce total vehicle miles traveled
12% by 2030, compared to a 2019 baseline, by
reducing commute vehicle miles traveled 20%,
visitor vehicles miles traveled 10%, and resident
vehicle miles traveled 6%
• Mobility: Increase the mode share for active
transportation (walking, biking) and transit from
19% to 40% of local work trips by 2030
• Natural Environment: Restore and enhance
resilience and biodiversity of our natural
environment throughout the City
• Natural Environment: Increase tree canopy to
40% city-wide coverage by 2030
• Natural Environment: By 2030, achieve a
10% increase in land area that uses green
stormwater infrastructure to treat urban water
runoff, compared to a 2020 baseline
Relationship Between the
NVCAP and Other City Plans and
Ordinances
The NVCAP implements the City of Palo Alto
Comprehensive Plan and provides more detailed
programs and policies for the specifically
defined NVCAP. These policies and programs are
consistent with those found in the Comprehensive
Plan but address the unique characteristics of
NVCAP.

To implement the NVCAP, Palo Alto made
changes to Title 18, Zoning, in the Palo Alto
Municipal Code (PAMC). This new code section
outlines specific development standards for
projects within the plan area. While many
of these are detailed in the plan itself, the
regulations in the NVCAP section of Title 18 take
precedence. If the NVCAP doesn’t specifically
change or replace zoning standards, the
established PAMC requirements apply. However,
if there’s a conflict between the development
standards of NVCAP and PAMC, NVCAP
standards will be followed.

Regulatory Compliance
The Plan was prepared in accordance with CEQA,
and any state applicable law. The NVCAP guides
all development within the Plan Area and will
require amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
to ensure consistency and to implement
the development regulations and land uses
established in this CAP. The CAP is adopted under
the authority of the City’s Zoning Ordinance,
which designates Coordinated Area Plans as
a tool to guide land use and development
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
22 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 23
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
111

Packet Pg. 298 of 554

The Community Process
The NVCAP was informed by a multi-year planning process, which prioritized a robust and authentic community process, and invited a diversity of voices from both city departmental agencies and community stakeholders to shape the future of the Plan Area. 2 The City of Palo Alto conducted:

Spotlight:

Community
Workshops
17 NVCAP Working
Group Meetings
2 Online Surveys
6 Stakeholder Group
Meetings
Meetings with
Decision-Makers
City Council
Historic Resources Board (HRB)
Parks and Recreation
Commission (PRC)
Planning and Transportation
Commission (PTC)
Architectural Review Board
(ARB)

1.7 Figure 20 A worksession during the NVCAP working group meeting Over the course of the planning process, City staff
and consultants conducted extensive community
outreach, providing numerous opportunities
for public engagement and meaningful input.

Stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and
other community members have volunteered
their time to thoughtfully consider the challenges
and opportunities afforded by this project and
contribute to the evolving plan ideas.

As part of the planning process, three draft
alternatives were developed for the NVCAP. The
draft alternatives take into account feedback
provided by: (1) the NVCAP Working Group, (2)
feedback from community members provided
at community workshops, (3) analyses and
information provided by the City’s consultant
team to City staff and leadership. City Council
deliberated and selected a preferred scenario.

This community process led to the development
of the draft plan including the vision and design
framework included in Chapter 2.

INTRODUCTION
24 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 25
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
112

Packet Pg. 299 of 554

The NVCAP Working Group
Consistent with PAMC 19.10.030 and to ensure
significant and meaningful community
engagement, the City Council appointed a
14-member Working Group (WG). The WG was
made up of 14 individuals and two alternates.

The group’s composition represented a diversity
of interests and expertise, including homeowners
and renters, people of different ages and cultural
backgrounds. The WG included:
• Residents (renters and property owners) living
within the Plan Area boundaries or the greater
North Ventura neighborhood.
• Business owners and local employees working
or owning a business within the Plan Area
boundaries or nearby (mix of small and larger
businesses).
• Property owners (large and small properties).
• City residents with expertise in urban design,
housing development, environmental planning,
transportation, or land economics.
• Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC)
member.
• Architectural Review Board (ARB) member.
• Parks and Recreation Commission member.

Over the course of 17 meetings held from 2018 to
2020, the WG reviewed and provided feedback
on existing conditions, planning alternatives, and
other information related to the planning area.

The WG created a vision statement for the Plan
Area which is summarized below:
‘The Working Group envisions the Plan
Area to replicate a European square
with open plaza, colorful public art,
beautiful landscaping with green open
spaces and lots of public amenities such
as benches, trails, and bike paths. The
building designs should fit well within the
existing context, between three and six
stories, interconnected with pedestrian
and bicycle paths. The bustling plaza
should have lots of local-serving retail
uses such as cafes, small local markets,
and theaters, which encourage lively
foot traffic. The Plan Area also should
provide diverse housing opportunities,
with minimum intrusion from automobile
traffic. ’
City Department Partnerships
The planning process was informed by
representatives from the City of Palo Alto to
ensure the plan was aligned with foundational
city plans, projects, and programs. The
departments represented include Planning &
Development, Transportation, Public Works,
Utilities, and Community Services.

The Community Workshops
Two community workshops were held to share
ideas, respond to study results, and weigh in on
the vision and emerging policies of the plan. The
first community workshop was held in February
2019. The community feedback helped to frame
the basis of the proposed draft plans. The
City hosted the second community workshop
on February 27, 2020. The workshop solicited
input on the three draft plan alternatives and
endeavored to identify community priorities on
various topics.

Community Surveys
Staff prepared two online community surveys
(April 2020 and October 2020) to solicit input
from the members of the community. The surveys
aimed to reach community members unable to
attend the workshops. An online questionnaire
on the draft alternatives was created by staff
to solicit input from the community at-large in
October 2020. About 30 community members
responded. The majority of the participants
preferred Alternative 3, supporting higher
residential densities and heights, allowing small
office footprints. There was general agreement
on the proposed transportation improvements,
and parks and open space proposals. Opinions
varied over preservation of the cannery building.

Some preferred removal of old cannery building
for better and efficient use of the existing space,
while others supported partial retention.

Project Website
To augment the community engagement
efforts, the city hosted a robust project website
that served as the primary online portal for
community engagement. It included information
on project updates, upcoming events, updated
summaries of workshops and staff reports.

Public Noticing / Mailing List
Notices of all public hearings and WG meetings
were published in accordance with the
regulations set forth by the Palo Alto Municipal
Code and City regulations. Additionally, an
extensive emailing list consisting of over 430
interested community members was developed
and maintained by City staff and used for
disseminating information to all interested
individuals.

Stakeholder Group Meetings
Stakeholder groups including property owners,
commercial tenants, area residents, Palo Alto
Unified School District and affinity groups/
advocates (affordable housing representatives,
bicycle groups, environmental representatives,
etc.) were identified early in the NVCAP process
and their input was gathered through a series
of six meetings. Staff also presented to the
Palo Alto Unified School District Committee on
December 2018, on February 20, 2020, and on
October 15, 2020. Palo Alto Unified School District
Board Members indicated an interest to site a
new school to serve new families conceived in
the draft alternatives. The City is supportive of
working together to understand student yield
from proposed typologies and suitable sites.

During the development and public review of
alternatives, City staff have continued discussions
with stakeholders, such as property owners and
affordable housing advocates to gather their
feedback on evolving policy ideas and aspects of
the alternatives.

Decision Maker Meetings
Since the initiation of the NVCAP planning
work in October 2018, City staff have provided
several updates to the following boards: City
Council, Historic Resources Board (HRB), Parks
and Recreation Commission (PRC), Planning
and Transportation Commission (PTC), and the
Architectural Review Board (ARB).

1.6 Figure 21 A sketch session and report back during the NVCAP working group meeting
Figure 22 A presentation during a community workshop

INTRODUCTION
26 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 27
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
113

Packet Pg. 300 of 554

Vision
2 2.1 Plan C oncept

2.2 L and Use

2.3 Gr ound Floor Edges

2.4 Mobility

2.5 E cology and Sustainability

2.6 Urb an Form
The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan sets forth
a flexible, aspirational vision to guide growth and
investment to support a transit oriented, mixed-use,
mixed-income, and walkable neighborhood.

The vision frameworks described in the following pages illustrates the desired physical form delivered incrementally over time which:
• Honors the storied history and
unique character of the North
Ventura neighborhood;
• Understands the needs of
current residents and puts
forward near-term solutions to
current challenges;
• Establishes a long-term
framework for desired growth
so more people can call North
Ventura home; and
• Invests in community
infrastructure to support
an equitable, resilient, and
sustainable Palo Alto.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
114

Packet Pg. 301 of 554

2 .1
Plan Concept
Figure 23 The NVCAP Concept at Potential Full Build-out

GREEN STORMWATER

INFRASTRUCTURE

SEAMLESS CONNECTION

TO CALTRAIN

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE

FRIENDLY STREETS

ENHANCED

URBAN FOREST

ENERGY EFFICIENT

BUILDINGS

COMMUNITY

OPEN SPACE

CELEBRATING

HISTORY

NATURALIZED

MATADERO CREEK

ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS

AND HABITAT

RESPECTING EXISTING

SINGLE FAMILY HOMES

ENHANCED MULTI-MODAL

INTERSECTIONS

STREET-ACTIVATING

BUILDINGS

THE VISION

AFFORDABLE

HOUSING OPTIONS
The Plan Concept illustrates the
vision of the full build-out of the
NVCAP as reflected in the plan.

The actual development within the plan area will
vary based on each parcel’s project goals and
constraints. The conceptual build-out reflected
in Figure 23 does not incorporate development
projects recently approved or constructed.
30 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 31
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
115

Packet Pg. 302 of 554

2.2 Land Use
Development Potential
by Land Use
NVCAP aims to achieve the following targets for
these land uses within the plan area:
• Allow up to 530 new dwelling units;
• Approximately 2 acres of public open space;
• 16,600 square feet of commercial development
including existing and new local retail and
professional services.

Table 3 Existing and Future Development Potential by Land Use Land Use Existing Future
Residential
(units)
142 units 672 units
Parks (acres) 0 acres 1.9 acres
Office (sq.ft.) 744,000 sq.ft. 466,000 sq.ft.

Retail (sq.ft.) 111,200 sq.ft. 103,700 sq.ft.

Figure 24 NVCAP Land Use Framework

THE VISION
32 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 33
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
116

Packet Pg. 303 of 554

2.2 Residential
The NVCAP land use framework is principally
focused on supporting a variety of housing
options, a diverse range of unit sizes and
bedroom configurations, and price points to
support Palo Alto residents at different stages of
life. Residential density will depend on its location
within the Plan Area. For example, mixed use
midrise development will be encouraged along
commercial corridors whereas townhomes will
be encouraged adjacent to existing residential
development.

The land use designations listed below are
calibrated for a wide range of multi-family
housing typologies:

High-Density Mixed Use
The high-density mixed-use designation is
located along the southern segment of El Camino
Real. The designation is intended to support
five- to six-story mid-rise apartment buildings.

This designation requires active uses for ground
floor frontages with retail requirements at specific
nodes along El Camino Real, to support its role as
a regional commercial corridor. The designation
requires that upper stories be residential.

Medium-Density Mixed Use
The medium-density mixed-use designation is
located on the northern segment of El Camino
Real and Page Mill Road. The designation is
intended to support four- to five-story mid-rise
apartment buildings. This designation requires
active uses for ground floor frontages with retail
requirements at specific nodes along El Camino
Real, to support its role as a regional commercial
corridor. The designation requires that upper
stories be residential.

Project Goals
Housing and Land Use
Add to the City’s supply of multi-
family housing, including market rate,
affordable, “missing middle, ” and senior
housing in a walkable, mixed-use, transit-
accessible neighborhood, with retail and
commercial services, open space, and
possibly arts and entertainment uses.

Balance of Community
Interests
Balance community-wide objectives
with the interests of neighborhood
residents and minimize displacement of
existing residents.

Low-Density Mixed Use
The low-density mixed-use designation serves
as a transition between the high-density mixed-
use area and the low-density residential areas
located in the interior of the plan area. The
designation area is also located along Ash
Street and Portage Avenue, to support mid-
to-low-rise multi-family development near the
proposed public park. Active ground floor uses
are encouraged but not required. Residential is
required on the upper floors.

High-Density Residential
The high-density residential designation is
located on the large 395 Page Mill Road site and
is targed towards development on the surface
parking lots.

Medium-Density Residential
The medium-density residential designation
is located at the 340 Portage Avenue site to
support the long-term goal of supporting
additional housing in the plan area. The
designation requires that both the ground
floor and upper floors are residential use. The
designation is intended to support a mix of
townhouses and mid-rise apartments. Allowable
heights are calibrated to support sensitive
structures such as the Cannery building.

Figure 25 Example of High-Density
Mixed Use in Palo Alto Figure 26 Example of Medium-Density Mixed Use in Palo Alto
Figure 27 Example of Low-Density
Mixed Use in Palo Alto
Figure 28 Example of High Density
Residential in Palo Alto
Figure 29 Example of Medium Density
Residential in Palo Alto
Low-Density Residential
The low-density residential designation is
calibrated to both facilitate new housing
development while also being sensitive to the
existing single-family neighborhood fabric -
located along Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue.

This area of existing single-family homes has
been designated as an area of stability and will
not experience a significant degree of change.

Figure 30 Example of Low Density
Residential in Palo Alto

THE VISION
34 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 35
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
117

Packet Pg. 304 of 554

2.2 Figure 31 The Cloudera Galactic HQ is
located at 395 Page Mill Road
Land Use Classification Anticipated
Density (DU/AC)
Maximum
Height (FT) FAR Allowed Zoning
Districts
High-Density Mixed Use 61-100 3.0:1 NV-MXH Medium-Density Mixed-Use 31-70 55 2.0:1 NV-MXM
Low-Density Mixed Use 3-17 35 0.5:1 NV-MXL
High Density Residential 61-100 65 3.0:1 NV-R4
Medium Density Residential 16-30 45 1.5:1 NV-R3
Low Density Residential 1 or 2 units/lot 35 0.45:1 NV-R2 NV-R1
Public Facilities and Open Space n/a n/a n/a NV-PF
Table 4 Proposed NVCAP Development Standards
Affordable Housing
To bolster the City’s affordable housing program,
new townhome ownership projects across the
plan area would provide 20% inclusionary below
market rate (BMR) units. For all other housing types,
both ownership and rental, a 15% inclusionary BMR
requirement would apply. In accordance with the
Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC), in-lieu fees may
be paid in certain circumstances.

Proposed 100% below-market-rate (BMR) projects
in the NVCAP are eligible for an additional height
bonus through either the State Density Bonus or the
City’s Housing Incentive Program.

Open Space
This land use designation is located in the
southeastern corner of the plan area. This will
include the approximately 2 acre public open space
as well as the re-naturalization of the Matadero
Creek between Park Boulevard and Lambert
Avenue.

Existing Uses
Existing land uses are permitted to remain in
place and continue operations. Existing buildings
or land uses which become nonconforming
as a result of the new zoning and land use
classifications are governed by the provisions
in the Zoning Code regarding nonconforming
buildings and uses. Certain limits are established
for repairs, additions, restoration, expansion, and
occupancy after an extended vacancy. See PAMC

18.70 (Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying
Facilities) for applicable requirements.

THE VISION
36 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 37
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
118

Packet Pg. 305 of 554

2.3 Ground Floor
Edges
The street level is the most
important interface between a
building and the public realm. Each
development should define and
animate the street level, exploring
active uses, transparency, and
engaging design.

Figure 32 NVCAP Ground Floor
Edges Framework
For design standards and guidelines, go to:

Chapter 5: Site and Building Design

REQUIRED

RETAIL EDGE

REQUIRED

RETAIL EDGE

THE VISION
38 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 39
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
119

Packet Pg. 306 of 554

2.3 Active Ground Floor Uses
To create a pedestrian-friendly environment and
visual interest on the ground floors of buildings,
new development within within designated areas
of high-density and medium-density mixed-use
designations will provide active uses on frontages
facing a public right-of-way, greenway, or park,
to the degree feasible. Retail or retail-like uses are
required at specific frontages facing El Camino
Real and encouraged along Park Boulevard.

By requiring ground floor commercial uses at
select nodes along prominent corridors, NVCAP
is supporting the ability for residents to walk to
everyday services and subsequently reduce the
number of cars on the road. See Figure 32 on

Page 38 ends

use areas.

Active uses include but are not limited to the
following:
• Neighborhood-serving retail which provides
goods and services that people would
frequently use to take care of their personal and
household needs. Examples include grocery
stores, drug stores, restaurants, dry cleaners, hair
salons, etc.
• Office use, limited to no more than 5,000 sq. ft.
for the parcel. Office use may include General
Business, Medical, and Professional; use should
be neighborhood serving.
• Public Uses including a community room and
daycare.
• Building lobbies.
• Spaces accessory to residential uses, such as
fitness rooms, workspaces, leasing offices,
shared kitchens, and mail rooms.
• Building frontage for mechanical equipment,
transformer doors, parking garage entrances,
exit stairs, and other facilities necessary to the
operation of the building are excluded from this
requirement.

Retail Frontage
Where ground floor retail is required within the
Plan Area, an urban edge should be created to
foster healthy street life. This includes storefronts
with tall floor to ceiling heights to foster visibility and transparency for homegrown businesses.

Traditional retail such as food and beverage
establishments are a subset of active uses.

Residential Frontage
Residential stoops, porches, patios, terraces,
and frontage courts create a social edge to a
neighborhood street. When set back by a small
distance and vertically above the sidewalk grade,
they can also ensure privacy at a comfortable
social distance for a residential unit.

Figure 34 Neighborhood-serving retail along major
boulevards like El Camino Real.

Figure 33 Building lobbies and other accessory spaces to residential uses are considered active uses.

Figure 35 Residential stoops should be set back and elevated to provide privacy for residents.

THE VISION
40 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 41
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
120

Packet Pg. 307 of 554

2.4 Mobility
The envisioned mobility framework
for the NVCAP will provide an array
of high-quality mobility options
on safe, low-stress, and visually
interesting streets.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be designed
for people of all ages and abilities, and accessible
paths to transit will include wayfinding signage
and other amenities. Streets and intersections
will be designed to prioritize local circulation and
access and to encourage low vehicle speeds. The
planned improvements will be fully integrated into
the surrounding neighborhoods to ensure seamless
connections for all users.

Figure 36 NVCAP Mobility Framework
For design standards and guidelines, go to:

Chapter 3: Public Realm
Chapter 4: Accessibility and Mobility

THE VISION
42 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 43
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
121

Packet Pg. 308 of 554

2.4 Pedestrian Realm
A well-designed, integrated pedestrian network
is a vital component of the NVCAP. The mobility
framework prioritizes a fully connected, ADA-
accessible sidewalk network throughout the
neighborhood. Wide, tree-lined sidewalks will
foster a people-first environment, where all ages
and abilities can move safely and conveniently
throughout the neighborhood.

Portage Avenue, Park Boulevard, and Olive
Avenue will become priority walking routes to the
California Avenue Caltrain Station and the bus
stops along El Camino Real to ensure convenient
alternatives to driving.

In addition to established public sidewalks, the
Plan envisions publicly accessible private paths to
bridge existing gaps.

Project Goals
Transit, Pedestrian, and
Bicycle Connections
Create and enhance well-defined
connections to transit, pedestrian, and
bicycle facilities, including connections to
the Caltrain Station, Park Boulevard, and
El Camino Real.

Connected Street Grid
Create a connected street grid, filling in
sidewalk gaps and street connections to
California Avenue, the Caltrain Station,
and El Camino Real where appropriate.

Community Facilities
and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate development
of new community facilities and
infrastructure with private development,
recognizing both the community’s needs
and that such investments can increase
the cost of housing.

Spotlight:

The Portage Avenue Woonerf
Central to the vision for a re-imagined North
Ventura neighborhood is a shared street, or
“woonerf,” along Portage Avenue.

Woonerf (“street for living”) is a Dutch term
for an integrated, common space shared by
pedestrians, bicyclists, and low-speed motor
vehicles. They typically have no curbs or
sidewalks, and vehicles are slowed by trees,
Figure 37 NVCAP Pedestrian Network
Publicly accessible shared path on private
property
Pedestrian path
Woonerf
External pedestrian connections
Project Boundary
planters, parking areas, and other traffic
calming devices in the street. In addition to
becoming a great space for walking and
bicycling, the Portage Avenue woonerf can
provide a placemaking space for community
gatherings, events, retail, and other flexible
uses.

Figure 38 View of the Bell Street Woonerf in Seattle, Washington Legend

THE VISION
44 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 45
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
122

Packet Pg. 309 of 554

Street From To Bike Facility
El Camino Real Page Mill Road Lambert Avenue Separated and/or Buffered Bike Lane along segment
Ash Street
Page Mill Road Olive Avenue Shared Use Path
Acacia Avenue Lambert Avenue Bicycle Boulevard
Park Boulevard Page Mill Road Lambert Avenue Separated Bike Lanes Page Mill Road El Camino Real Park Boulevard Separated or Buffered Bike Lanes
Olive Avenue El Camino Real Park Boulevard Bicycle Boulevard with Wide Sidewalks
Portage Avenue
El Camino Real Ash Street Shared Use Path or Bicycle
Boulevard
Ash Street Park Boulevard Woonerf or Shared Use Path
Bike Network
The NVCAP will feature a high-quality, “low-
stress” bikeway network that will be comfortable
for people of all ages and abilities to use. The
proposed network will be integrated into the
citywide network to ensure safe, convenient
connections to the adjacent neighborhoods. This
will be achieved by selecting bicycle facilities that
prioritize safety and comfort based on vehicle
speeds and volumes, and with intersections
that have appropriate bike-specific crossing
treatments and traffic control. Wayfinding
signage and ample bicycle parking are also
integral elements of the network. The bicycle
network will support a range of users, including
the future integration of scooters, e-bikes, and
other micromobility devices.

The low-stress bike network will include
separated bicycle lanes on busier streets, bicycle
boulevards on calmer neighborhood streets,
and well-designed intersections throughout the
project Plan.

Shared-Use Paths are off-street, two-way
bikeways physically separated from motor vehicle
traffic and used by people bicycling, walking, and
other non-motorized users.

Separated Bike Lanes are dedicated bikeways
that combine the user experience of a multi-
use path but are located on a street. They
are physically distinct from the sidewalk and
separated from motor vehicle traffic by physical
objects such as parked vehicles, a curb, green
stormwater infrastructure, or posts.

2.4 Buffered Bike Lanes provide dedicated on-street
space for bicyclists delineated with a designated
buffer space separating the bicycle lane from the
adjacent motor vehicle travel lane.

Bicycle Boulevards are streets with low vehicle
volumes and speeds, designated and designed
to prioritize bicyclists. Bicycle boulevards use
signs, pavement markings, and speed and
volume management measures to discourage
vehicle cut-through trips and include safe,
convenient bicycle crossings of busy arterials.

The 2012 Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation
Plan includes a potential future grade-separated
pedestrian and bicycle crossing of Caltrain/
Alma Street, either near Matadero Creek/
Park Boulevard or between Margarita and
Loma Verde Avenues. This project is outside of
the NVCAP boundary but will close the gap
between existing crossings and greatly improve
east-west connectivity in conjunction with other
improvements.

Gateway Intersections
The intersections surrounding the Plan Area will
be enhanced to improve access, safety, and
connectivity to adjacent neighborhoods. This is
particularly important for pedestrian and bicycle
safety, as the current intersections’ designs largely
prioritize vehicular speed and access. New design
guidance and signal technology advancements
offer options for improved intersection
interactions between people walking, biking,
and driving. In particular, intersections on the
bicycle network with a high potential for conflicts
between bicycles and vehicles must be designed
thoughtfully.

Figure 39 Bike Facility Degree of Separation
Figure 40 NVCAP Bike Network Framework
Table 5 Bicycle Facility Classifications

THE VISION
Separated
Bike Lane
Publicly Accessible
Shared Paths on
Private Property
Woonerf
Bike Boulevard
External Bike
Connections
Project Boundary
Legend Shared Paths
46 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 47
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
123

Packet Pg. 310 of 554

2.4 Transit
The success of transit is strongly dependent
upon the level of convenience that is offered
to the patron. Currently, the North Ventura
neighborhood contains two transit stops: a mid-
block stop located at El Camino Real and Portage
Avenue and a far-side stop located at El Camino
Real and Page Mill Road. The mobility framework
focuses on designing intuitive, accessible, and
safe routes to transit through priority pedestrian
and bike streets, wayfinding signage to navigate
to Caltrain, enhanced bus stop amenities for
passengers, and a mobility hub along Portage
Avenue.

Vehicles Circulation and Parking
The mobility framework serves the needs of
existing and future development with vehicle
and parking strategies aimed to prioritize local
circulation and access, encourage low speeds,
and determine right-sized parking capacity.

To support local access and mitigate cut-through
traffic, the Plan proposes to convert Ash Street
from Page Mill Road to Olive Avenue into a one-
way southbound street. Olive Avenue from Ash
Street to El Camino Real will remain a two-way
street.

Vehicular traffic on the woonerf on Portage
Avenue is permitted but should be discouraged.

Vehicle circulation in this area will be primarily
for access to buildings located on the woonerf.

Acacia Avenue from Ash Street to Park Boulevard
will be a private aisle for accessing residential
frontage on Acacia Avenue for parking and
unloading.

In compliance with AB-2097, no parking
minimums are to be set as the neighborhood
is near a Caltrain Station. However, there
will also be no parking maximums, allowing
the neighborhood to follow a market-based
regulatory approach. No new surface parking
is proposed, and new parking supply should be
implemented on the ground or basement levels
of new buildings. Where new buildings are not
proposed, existing surface parking spaces are
to remain to support remaining commercial
offices. Street parking is to remain in front of
single-family homes on Pepper Avenue and Olive
Spotlight:

Mobility Hub
Mobility hubs are places in a community that
bring together public transit, bike share, car
share and other sustainable transportation
modes. The MTC Mobility Hub Program has
identified the North Ventura neighborhood
as a candidate for a mobility hub. This
neighborhood’s proximity to the proposed
public park, the California Avenue Caltrain
Station, and bus stops on El Camino Real
provides important connections to regional
transit and micromobility pathways. The
neighborhood mobility hub is proposed at the
intersection of Portage Avenue and El Camino
Real. This location is ideal given its proximity
to varying active frontage uses as well as the
proposed woonerf. Proposed amenities could
include:
• Transit shelters and waiting areas.
• Bicycle parking facilities.
• Shared mobility (bike share, scooter share,
etc.) access points.
• Electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure.
• Designated parking for car share services.
• Real-time travel information signage and
interactive displays.
• Area maps and bulletins promoting local
amenities and events.
• Monitoring systems to measure ridership,
mobility, security, and public life metrics.
• Digital and physical wayfinding tools.

Avenue, with no new street parking proposed
along new developments. Street parking near
intersections should be restricted to ensure
large vehicles and emergency vehicles are
able to safely make turns. To support the new
ground-floor retail and active use frontage in
new buildings, short-term parking should be
implemented on the ground or basement levels
of the new developments.

Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) Strategies
TDM strategies can be effective at encouraging
fewer trips made by single-occupancy vehicles
(SOV). An effective TDM Plan ensures that
alternative modes of transportation, such as
walking, bicycling, public transit, or other forms
of shared mobility, are made available to site
occupants and nearby community members.

TDM enhancements have additional benefits
beyond reducing SOV trips, including:
• Improving the environment by reducing traffic
congestion and air quality impacts produced by
new development.
• Improving transportation circulation and safety
conditions for community members.
• Quality of life enhancements that improve the
public realm.

Figure 41 NVCAP Vehicle Movement and Parking Framework
Major Intersection
Improvements
Minor Intersection
Improvements
Traffic Signals
Project Boundary
Vehicular Movement
Vehicular Street on Private Property
Surface Parking
Vehicular Street
Legend

THE VISION
48 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 49
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
124

Packet Pg. 311 of 554

2.5 Ecology and
Sustainability
NVCAP’s ecological framework
takes direct inspiration from the
City’s Sustainability and Climate
Action Plan, putting forward
design strategies that collectively
expands the definition of
sustainability.

This framework goes beyond mitigation,
adaptation, and resilience, but grounded in
regeneration – identifying opportunities for
renewal, restoration, carbon sequestration, and
growth of the natural environment.

The future streets, parks, natural areas, and
buildings will restore and enhance habitat
and pollinator pathways, flood protection and
stormwater management, cleaner air and
cleaner water, and healthier habitats for current
and future generations.

Figure 42 NVCAP Ecology and Sustainability Framework
For design standards and guidelines, go to:

Chapter 3: Public Realm
Chapter 4: Accessibility and Mobility
Chapter 5: Parks and Open Space
Chapter 6: Site and Building Design

GREEN STORMWATER

INFRASTRUCTURE

ENHANCED

URBAN FOREST

ENERGY EFFICIENT

BUILDINGS

COMMUNITY

OPEN SPACE

CELEBRATING

HISTORY

NATURALIZED

MATADERO CREEK

ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS

AND HABITAT

POLLINATOR

PATHWAYS
GREEN
ROOFS

THE VISION
50 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 51
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
125

Packet Pg. 312 of 554

2.5 Public Park
Located in the southeast corner of the Plan
Area, NVCAP proposes to transform a surface
parking lot into a new public park that is
approximately two acres. The potential future
naturalization of Matadero Creek between Park
Boulevard and Lambert Avenue serves as the
organizing framework for the park’s design and
neighborhood destination, inviting Palo Alto
residents, employees, and visitors to enjoy access
to recreational activities, habitat, and inclusive
community programming. Shared multi-use
pathways weave through the park, providing
access to the Creek and seamless connections
to the citywide pedestrian and bicycle network,
ensuring that the park is a beloved city asset that
can be enjoyed by the entire community.

The primary entrance to the park is along the
proposed Portage Avenue woonerf directly
across from the historic Palo Alto Cannery,
creating an iconic activity node. The design of
the proposed Portage Avenue woonerf supports
a natural extension of the park to the renovated
Cannery building.

Project Goals
Sustainability and the
Environment
Protect and enhance the environment,
while addressing the principles of
sustainability.

Community Facilities
and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate development
of new community facilities and
infrastructure with private development,
recognizing both the community’s needs
and that such investments can increase
the cost of housing.

Matadero Creek
NVCAP proposes future re-naturalization of
a section of the Matadero Creek, removing
the existing U-shaped concrete channel and
replacing it with a widened, natural channel.

The goals of a renaturalization project are to
provide community benefits, re-establish riparian
ecosystem habitat, and avoid adverse impacts
on hydraulic performance and flood risks. The
NVCAP supports a widened natural corridor with
an area available for riparian plantings, creative
landscape architecture design, and increased
recreation access. This concept includes replacing
the Lambert Avenue bridge with a longer
span and widening the creek channel from
approximately 30 feet wide to 100 feet wide.

Green Stormwater Infrastructure
As an integral part of the Plan Area’s ecological
and sustainability framework, the public realm
consists of a coordinated network of multi-
functional landscapes that effectively manage
stormwater, create pollinator pathways, mitigate
the urban heat island effect, and create usable
public spaces for all to enjoy.

Figure 44 An example of a restored creek in San Luis Obispo, CA.

Figure 45 An example of green stormwater infrastructure integrated with street furnishings.

Figure 43 A conceptual design for the future public park

SAFE CONNECTION

TO BOULWARE PARK

COMMUNITY

GARDENS

MULTI-USE

OPEN SPACE

ACTIVE ZONES

OBSERVATION DECK

THE VISION
52 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 53
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
126

Packet Pg. 313 of 554

2.6 Urban Form
NVCAP’s Urban Form framework
champions the design of
buildings that are respectful
neighbors, human-scaled,
and embrace the street. New
development will respond to
the surrounding context such
as building up to El Camino
Real while creating a gentle
transition to quieter residential
portions of the neighborhood.

THE VISION
For design standards and guidelines, go to:

Chapter 6: Site and Building Design
Project Goals
Urban Design, Design
Guidelines, and
Neighborhood Fabric
Develop human-scale urban design
strategies, and design guidelines that
strengthen and support the neighborhood
fabric. Infill development will respect the
scale and character of the surrounding
residential neighborhood.

The Urban Form framework was developed
taking into account the existing neighborhood
in the plan area, including the existing
residential neighborhoods. In addition to
creating a well-connected neighborhood
accessible by all modes of transportation,
the framework also evaluated transitions
between the future development and existing
neighborhoods, as well as between private
development and the public realm. This
informed the building standards and site
design standards for the plan area.

The design standards and guidelines for
the public realm, public park, and buildings
are laid out in the subsequent chapters.

The standards and guidelines will create a
complete and well-connected neighborhood
that is respectful of the existing urban fabric
and achieve the goals of the plan.

Figure 47 Urban form design standards requires setbacks and stepbacks for new development that is adjacent to single family zoning.

Design for living
― Residential
Figure 46 Internal streets have height allowances that
are conducive with missing middle housing like
townhomes.
54 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 55
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
127

Packet Pg. 314 of 554

3.1 Sidw alk Zone

3.2 Traffic Lanes and Intersections

3.3 Green Infrastructure

3.4 Paving

3.5 Exterior Lighting

3.6 Wayfinding

3.7 Public Art
Public Realm
3 The public realm is a connective tissue of streets, parks, plazas, and natural spaces that weaves throughout the
neighborhood, serving as an organizing framework for
future development while fostering inclusive, experience- rich spaces for the entire Palo Alto community.

Building on the 2030 Comprehensive
Plan’s Urban Design Vision, the Plan
Area’s public realm will ‘serve as centers
for public life with gathering places,
bicycle and pedestrian access, safety-
enhancing night-time lighting and clear
visual access, and, in some cases, small-
scale retail uses such as cafes.’
The standards and guidelines layout
a planned, intentional, well-designed
public realm network that works in
unison to achieve multiple goals:
• Aesthetically pleasing, context-
appropriate streets that enhance
residents’ quality of life and Palo Alto’s
reputation as ‘a gracious residential
community.’
• A comprehensive multi-modal
network that provides equitable
access to clean, safe, and reliable
mobility options and seamlessly
connects to the larger citywide
transportation network.
• Open spaces that blend people
places with green stormwater
infrastructure to provide new social
gathering outdoor rooms while
showcasing climate-positive design.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
128

Packet Pg. 315 of 554

3.2 T raffic Lanes and Intersections
The neighborhood is bounded on the west and
north by two major vehicular roads: El Camino
Real, a major arterial, and Oregon Expressway,
an street designed to move higher volumes of
vehicles quickly and efficiently.

However, most streets within the Plan Area are
classified in the Comprehensive Plan as local/
collectors, designed to calm traffic and give
pedestrians priority in terms of scale and facility.

The plan is aligned with the recommendations of
the National Association of City Transportation
Officials (NACTO) which states that narrower lane
widths such as 10 feet are appropriate in urban
areas and have a positive impact on street safety
without impacting traffic operations.

Standards:

The regulations that govern the requirements
for traffic lanes and intersections are mentioned
below. The information described here provides
a general overview of requirements and is not
intended to replace the regulations referenced.

3.2.1 Local Street Traffic Lane Width
All vehicle traffic lanes on local streets shall have
a width of 10 feet.

3.2.2 C alifornia Fire Code
All roadway configurations shall comply with the
California Fire Code. This includes the following:
• Roadway widths shall accommodate aerial
fire apparatus set up at strategic locations
for buildings over 27 feet tall.
•
W alkable pathways shall be a minimum of 16
feet wide and support fire apparatus weights
if vehicle traffic circulation is being restricted.

3.2.3 Cr osswalk Treatments
All crosswalk surfacing and treatments shall
follow the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
specifications.

3.2.4 In tersection Enhancements
All intersection enhancements shall select from
the following toolbox:
• High visibility marked crosswalks.
• Raised crosswalks.
• Advance stop bars and yield lines.
• Daylighting to improve sightlines by
removing parking adjacent to the
intersection.
• ADA-accessible, bi-directional curb ramps.
• Curb extensions or bulb-outs.
• Bicycle detention and markings to indicate
the position and path for bicyclists to cross
the intersection.
• Traffic signals.
• Accessible pedestrian signals at intersections
with clear markings, audio, and braille
messaging.
• Leading pedestrian intervals at signalized
intersections for pedestrians to establish their
presence in the crosswalks before vehicles
proceed.
• Green Stormwater Infrastructure
Guidelines:

3.2.5 Ar tful Intersections
To enhance the aesthetics and vibrancy of
the roadway, key intersections and crosswalks
should be evaluated for the inclusion of public
art, such as unique pavers, intersection murals,
or crosswalk artwork, where appropriate. For
additional information, refer to the Public Art
Program provisions and Public Art Master Plan.
3 .1
Sidewalk Zone
Sidewalk Zone design is important for creating
a safe, accessible, and attractive urban
environment that caters to the needs of
pedestrians and cyclists.

The City has established design guidelines and
required standards for sidewalk improvements
outlined in PAMC Section 18.24.020 that are
applicable to development in the NVCAP.

The design elements apply to the three distinct
sidwalk zones: Frontage, Sidewalk, and Street.

Below is description of the zones and objective
design standards. For additional information
please refer to the respecitve PAMC section.

Project Goal
Community Facilities
and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate
development of new community
facilities and infrastructure with private
development, recognizing both the
community’s needs and that such
investments can increase the cost of
housing.

Figure 48 The Sidewalk Zone

PUBLIC REALM
Frontage Sidewalk Street
Building
Setback Frontage Area Pedestrian Clear
Zone
Landscape/
Furniture Zone Vehicle/Bike Lanes
Mixed-Use
• Sidewalk Dining
• Outdoor Displays
• Public Art
• Seating
• Trees/Planting
Residential
• Stoops
• Porches
• Front Yards
• Trees/Planting
• Sidewalk • Street Trees/
Planting
• Street
Lighting
• Seating
• Bike Parking
• Public Art
• Outdoor
Dining
• Bus Shelters
• Utilites (e.g.,
hydrants)
• Street Parking
• Bike Lanes
• Drop-off Zones
• Parklets
• Bus Stops
Table 6 Allowed Features by Sidwalk Zone
For more information on street
dimensions, go to: Chapter 4:

Accessibility and Mobility
58 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 59
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
129

Packet Pg. 316 of 554

3.3 Green Infrastructure
Project Goal
Sustainability and the
Environment
Protect and enhance the environment,
while addressing the principles of
sustainability.

As an integral part of the Plan Area’s ecological
network, the public realm will consist of a
coordinated network of green stormwater
infrastructure intended to implement the
Comprehensive Plan’s vision to “provide
ecological and health benefits and a source of
beauty for residents. Palo Alto will strive for clean
air and clean water.” Inspired by natural systems,
the following standards and guidelines for
green stormwater infrastructure and the urban
forest are aimed at creating multi-functional
landscapes that:
• Effectively manage stormwater.
• Create pollinator pathways.
• De-pave unnecessary hardscaped areas to
mitigate the urban heat island effect.
• Create usable outdoor rooms which are an
extension of parks and plazas.

PUBLIC REALM
The regulations that govern the requirements
for green stormwater infrastructure and tree
protection are mentioned below. The information
described here provides a general overview of
requirements and is not intended to replace the
regulations referenced.

3.3.1 Gr een Stormwater Infrastructure
Green stormwater ifrastructure is built into
our urban environment to collect, slow, and
clean stormwater runoff through the use of
natural processes. Development is subject to
the requirements of the regional permit (San
Francisco Bay Municipal Regional Stormwater
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit) and local regulations. For details
on local requirements, see the Green Stormwater
Infrastructure (GSI) Plan and PAMC 16.11,
Stormwater Pollution Prevention.

3.3.2 Str eet Trees
Palo Alto boasts a large population of trees
and has been acknowledged by both the
State of California and the National Arbor Day
Foundation as a Tree City-USA. Preserving and
enhancing the City’s urban tree canopy is key
consideration for all development, especially for
vision of the new neighborhoods within NVCAP.

For tree preservation requirements, PAMC
Chapter 8, Trees and Vegetation, provide
standards for both public and privately owned
trees. These requirements apply to all trees
and landscaping within the public right of
way. For privately owned trees, specific native
mature trees are subject to the tree protection
requirements. Please refer to the PAMC for more
details.

For new development requiring street trees,
property owners shall consult with the City’s
Urban Forestry division to determine the
appropriate street tree. Tree species should
be selected based on a combination of their
aesthetics and their ecological performance
benefits and contextual placement. Where space
allows, either on private setbacks or within the
sidewalk zones, the planting of a second row of
street trees is encouraged.

3.3.3 P ollinator Pathways
The adopted Palo Alto Parks, Trails, Natural
Open Space, & Recreation Master Plan identifies
Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard as Pollinator
Pathways.

Street design for these streets shall integrate
native plantings (e.g. riparian, grassland, or oak
woodland), and specific habitat plantings to
support pollinators such as hummingbirds and
butterflies.

Figure 49 Bioretention
60 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 61
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
130

Packet Pg. 317 of 554

3.5 Exterior Lighting
Adequate exterior lighting should be provided in
all dedicated open spaces and along all streets
and greenways to ensure clear wayfinding and
safe pedestrian passage. Lighting design also has
an opportunity to support habitat and mitigate
light pollution, allowing current and future
generations to be able to look up and clearly see
the night sky.

The information described here provides a
general overview of requirements and is not
intended to replace established relevant
regulations unless specifically noted.

Standards:

3.5.1 Light Fixtures within Right-of-Way
All exterior light fixtures in the right-of-way shall
meet City of Palo Alto standards per PAMC 12.08
and be approved by the City.

3.5.2 F ully-Shielded Fixtures
All exterior light fixtures shall be fully shielded to
minimize glare, light trespass, and light pollution
throughout the neighborhood.

3.5.3 D ark Sky Compliant
Exterior light fixtures shall meet or exceed
applicable energy-efficiency standards while
adhering to recommended kelvin temperature
specified by the International Dark Sky
Association (2700) to prevent negative health
impacts on humans and wildlife except where
otherwise required for safety. This standard shall
be applicable until the City adopts the Citywide
ordinance on Dark Sky standards.

3.5.4 K ey Pedestrian Routes and Scale
Lighting shall reinforce key active transportation
streets and all lighting shall be scaled to the
pedestrian and bicycle experience.

3.5.5 Safety
Lighting shall allow facial recognition along paths
of travel. Lighting shall not create glare or “hot
spots” that would inhibit visual accessibility.

Guidelines:

3.5.6 Habit at Areas
If lighting is appropriate in the proposed public
park adjacent to the Creek and sensitive habitat
areas, light fixtures should be equipped with
motion sensors or timers to not disrupt the
circadian rhythms of wildlife.

3.5.7 R etail / Active Use Areas
Lighting on private property along El Camino
Real and Portage should incorporate signature
fixtures and a variety of special lighting types
such as catenary string lights to reinforce an
experience-rich street life. See PAMC 18.40,250,
Lighting, for more detail.

Figure 51 Dark sky compliant exterior light fixtures helps mitigate light pollution and the health of both humans
and wildlife.

Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare

PUBLIC REALM

3.4 Paving
Paving is a key component that will help define
the character, connectivity, and identity of the
North Ventura neighborhood’s varied streets and
open spaces. A hierarchy of paving materials
on streets like El Camino Real, Portage Avenue,
and Park Boulevard can help create clear
wayfinding and contributes aesthetically to the
neighborhood.

Standards:

3.4.1 Cit y Standards
All street paving shall meet City of Palo Alto
Sidewalk Standards per PAMC 12.08 and be
approved by the city engineer or designate.

3.4.2 Solar Reflectance Index (SRI)
Materials that reduce the urban heat island
effect by using pavement with a Solar
Reflectance Index (SRI) of 29 or higher shall be
selected for use.

3.4.3 P ortage Avenue Special Paving
The Portage Avenue Woonerf shall incorporate
a special paving pattern. The use of contrasting,
tactile, and high-quality paving that distinguishes
the bike lanes and vehicle lanes with a curbless
street that prioritizes pedestrians, gathering and
spill-over activities is encouraged.

Guidelines:

3.4.4 R esponsible Material Use
Paved areas should be made of sustainable
paving materials, including recycled, local,
and sustainable sourced materials. Consider
opportunities for the reuse of demolition waste
from the site.

3.4.5 A ccent Paving at Intersections
Street improvement projects should install accent
paving at key intersections and raised crossings. .

3.4.6 El C amino Real Special Paving
In coordination with Caltrans and VTA,
the segment of El Camino Real within the
neighborhood should incorporate a special
paving pattern that reflects its position as a
Grand Boulevard. The paving material should
extend into the private setback along active
ground floor uses to create a more comfortable
and welcoming public space for adjacent
businesses.

3.4.7 P ervious Paving for Green Stormwater
Infrastructure
Large hardscaped areas such as parking areas,
sidewalks, and driveways could utilize types of
pervious pavements to reduce ponding, recharge
groundwater, and prevent stormwater pollution.

Figure 50 Light colored pavement reduces the
urban heat island effect.

For more information on
intersections go to: Chapter 4:

Accessibility and Mobility
62 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 63
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
131

Packet Pg. 318 of 554

3.7 Public Art
Building on the City’s legacy of commissioning
iconic public art within urban centers like
Downtown Palo Alto and California Avenue, the
integration of new and diverse public art can
contribute significantly to the sense of place
within the neighborhood. This plan is aligned
with the City of Palo Alto’s Public Art Master Plan’s
guiding principles which state that Palo Alto’s
public art will:
• Be distributed citywide, focusing on areas where
people gather and in unexpected places that
encourage exploration;
• Represent a broad variety of artistic media and
forms of expression;
• Enhance City infrastructure, transportation
corridors, and gateways;
• Include both permanent and temporary
artworks;
• Strive for artistic excellence;
• Be maintained for people to enjoy.

Guidelines:

3.7.1 L ocation of Public Art
Public art should be located at major social
engagement areas such as the proposed
public park and the Cannery Building, along
transportation corridors such as El Camino Real,
Portage Avenue, and Park Boulevard, and at
major gateway moments announcing that you
are entering the neighborhood.

Figure 53 The location of public art such as Passages
by Susan Zoccola should be located at the
public park, major transportation corridors
and major gateways.

PUBLIC REALM

3.6 W ayfinding
The design and integration of wayfinding
is an effective tool that can celebrate the
neighborhood’s history, foster a sense of place,
and support clear and predictable navigability
for residents, employees, and visitors.

Standards:

3.6.1: Caltrans Standards
Roadway signage shall comply with the
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD), and California Sign
Specifications.

3.6.2: City Standards
Active Transportation signage shall adhere to
the Design Standards included in the City of Palo
Alto’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan;
the regulations in Sign Ordinance, PAMC 16.20
may also apply.

Guidelines:

3.6.3: Shared Use Signage
Curbless streets such as Portage Avenue
Woonerf should have signage that indicates the
delineation of the right of way for pedestrians,
bicycles, and vehicles. Shared trails within the
public park should include signage indicating the
shared use area at pedestrian and bicycle eye
level.

3.6.4: Celebrate the Cannery and Other
Landmarks
Signage and wayfinding should take cues from
neighborhood landmarks like the Cannery
by correlating graphically and emulating a
consistent color and material palette.

3.6.5: Neighborhood Maps and Directional
Signage
Area-specific maps and directional signage that
highlights nearby destinations along pedestrian
pathways should be installed at major gateways
into the neighborhood.

3.6.6: Mile Markers and Educational Placards
The use of mile markers and educational and
interpretive placards can be placed along the
trails along Matadero Creek to inform visitors
about the re-naturalization process and
subsequent ecological benefits.

Figure 52 Neighborhood map and directional
signage are effective wayfinding tools for
visitors to the area.
64 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 65
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
132

Packet Pg. 319 of 554

4.1 P edestrian Realm

4.2 Bik e Network

4.3 G ateway Intersections

4.4 Str eet Sections

4.5 T ransit Access

4.6 V ehicle Circulation and Parking

4.7 T ransportation Demand Management
Accessibility and Mobility
4 Vibrant, pedestrian-oriented, and visually interesting streets will be the setting for the future of the North Ventura neighborhood. With generous and active
sidewalks, traffic calming devices, and low-stress bicycle facilities, the street network will provide a variety of options to travel safely and conveniently through the
neighborhood.

Building on the 2030 Comprehensive
Plan, Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan, and Grand Boulevard Palo Alto
Safety Study, the plan supports the
implementation of the City’s vision
to ‘build and maintain a sustainable
network of safe, accessible and
efficient transportation and parking
solutions for all users and modes,
while protecting and enhancing the
quality of life in Palo Alto. Programs
will include alternative and innovate
transportation processes, and the
adverse impacts of automobile traffic
on the environment in general and
residential streets in particular will be
reduced.

Streets will be safe, attractive and
designed to enhance the quality and
aesthetics of Palo Alto neighborhoods.

Palo Alto recognizes the regional
nature of its transportation system,
and will be a leader in seeking
regional transportation solutions,
prioritizing Caltrain service
improvements and railroad grade
separations.’
The following street sections, which
include street design standards and
guidelines, are intended to illustrate
the long term vision of the NVCAP
mobility network. The design of the
new streets will be built out over time.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
133

Packet Pg. 320 of 554

The NVCAP aims to create a fully connected,
accessible, and prioritized network of wide,
tree-lined sidewalks with regular maintenance,
promoting walkability, safety, and connections for
all residents.

Portage Avenue, Park Boulevard, and Olive
Avenue will be prioritized as walking routes to
the California Avenue Caltrain Station and bus
stops along El Camino Real, offering convenient
alternatives to driving. Establishing publicly
accessible private paths to bridge existing gaps
will further ensure a fully connected pedestrian
network within the plan area.

Standards:

4.1.1 P edestrian-Friendly Street Design
The NVCAP shall feature a fully connected,
ADA-accessible sidewalk network with enhanced
intersections promoting pedestrian safety and
accessibility while collaborating with local
disability organizations to ensure inclusive design
throughout.

4.1.2 Fir st/Last Mile Transit Connections
To create safe and accessible walking routes to
the California Avenue Caltrain Station and the
bus stops along El Camino Real, routes along
Park Boulevard shall be enhanced. The following
are some design options that can be considered
to meet this requirement:
• Pedestrian-scaled lighting
• Wider sidewalks
• Wayfinding signage
• Buffered bike lanes
• Collaborating with developers to restrict
new curb cuts, close old ones, and design for
activated ground floor frontages.

A signalized crosswalk at Page Mill Road/ Ash
Street can be considered to open another
accessible route to the Caltrain Station.

MOBILITY
Bike Network
The NVCAP will implement a high-quality, “low-
stress” bike network, seamlessly integrated
with the citywide system. This bike network,
incorporating separated lanes for busier streets,
boulevard treatments for calmer areas, and
well-designed intersections, will prioritize safety
and comfort for all users, including cyclists,
future micromobility devices, and pedestrians.

Wayfinding signage and ample parking will
complete this network, encouraging travel by
bike throughout the plan area and beyond.

Pedestrian Realm
Project Goal
Connected Street Grid
Create a connected street grid, filling in
sidewalk gaps and street connections to
California Avenue, the Caltrain Station,
and El Camino Real where appropriate.

Standards:

4.2.1 Bic ycle Facilities
The standards for bike facilities vary depending
on the streets within NVCAP. Table 5 in Chapter
2 on page 47 outlines the specific bike facility
improvements required for each street section.

These improvements range from shared use paths
and buffered bike lanes to bike boulevards.

4.2.2 C ompliance with Other Standards
The bicycle network within the plan area shall
comply with Citywide standards, including,
but not limited to, the Bicycle + Pedestrian
Transportation Plan. For El Camino Real,
additional consideration shall be given to
standards established by other relevant agencies.
4 .1 4.2

4.1.2 Woonerf
A woonerf shall be developed on Portage
Avenue between Ash Avenue and Park
Boulevard, designed in accordance with
the Portage Avenue Street Section Design
Standards and Guidelines outlined in Section

4.4 and consider the following:
• A row of street trees on either side of the
main travel way to designate pedestrian
priority areas adjacent to building frontages.
• Signage emphasizing the presence of
pedestrians and bicyclists.
• Textured or permeable pavement designed
to slow vehicle speeds and provide
stormwater management benefits.
• Pedestrian-scale lighting
• Seating areas
• Landscaping and Green Stormwater
Infrastructure
• Design elements that highlight the
community’s vision or character.

Guidelines:

4.1.3 P ublicly Accessible Private Path
As indicated in the NVCAP Pedestrian Network
(Figure 37 in Chapter 2), publicly accessible and
shared private paths should be estsablished
to contribute to the overall pedestrian network
within the plan area.

Project Goal
Transit, Pedestrian, and
Bicycle Connections
Create and enhance well-defined
connections to transit, pedestrian, and
bicycle facilities, including connections to
the Caltrain Station, Park Boulevard, and
El Camino Real.

Guidelines:

4.2.3 Bic ycle Support Facilities
Facilities that support bicycle travel should be
incorporated at various locations throughout the
NVCAP. These include:
• Wayfinding signage along the bicycle
network that provides information on routes,
destinations, and distances.
• Bicycle parking: expand the availability of
sidewalk bicycle parking, secure long-term
bicycle parking, and install end-of-trip
facilities at transit stops along El Camino Real
and at the California Avenue Caltrain Station.

These may be in the form of outdoor bicycle
racks, indoor or outdoor bicycle lockers, or
indoor bicycle parking cages for each tenant.
• Shower facilities and lockers at places of
employment.
70 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 71
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
134

Packet Pg. 321 of 554

Gateway Intersections

4.3 Figure 54 Map of Conceptual Gateway Intersection Design Improvements Recognizing the need to enhance the safety
and experience for all users, the NVCAP will
implement new design strategies for its gateway
intersections. These crucial entry and exit points
often face challenges in balancing the needs of
pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. By prioritizing
safety at these intersections, the plan aims
to create a more welcoming and accessible
environment for everyone entering and
leaving the plan area and to provide seamless
connection to the rest of the city.

NVCAP will pursue enhancements to the five
gateway intersections listed:

1. El Camino Real and Page Mill Road

2. El Camino Real and Olive Avenue

3. El Camino Real and Portage Avenue /
Hansen Way

4. Lambert Avenue and Ash Street

5. Park Boulevard and Portage Avenue
Details regarding each intersection are provided
in the following pages. For improvements to
intersections along streets not owned and
controlled by the City, specifically El Camino Real
and/or Page Mill Road, approval from Caltrans
and or the County is required. The City will work
closely with other partnering agencies to further
the goals and vision of the plan area, as well as
adhere to the design standards and guidelines of
partnering agencies.

The NVCAP prioritizes well-designed gateway
intersections, but acknowledges specific design
details will be subject to future City-led efforts,
ensuring flexibility and integration with evolving
needs. Broader and more comprehensive
analyses and engineering of gateway
intersections is required to finalize design
recommendations. This includes, but may not be
limited to, an Intersection Safety and Operational
Assessment Process (ISOAP) to identify the
optimal design strategies for intersection types,
geometry, and traffic control at gateway
intersections.

North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
Draft Document: January 2023
7  Daylighting to improve sightlines by
removing parking adjacent to the
intersection
 ADA-accessible, bi-directional curb ramps
 Curb extensions or bulb-outs
 Bicycle detection and markings to indicate
the position and path for bicyclists to cross
the intersection
 Traffic signals
 Accessible pedestrian signals at intersections
with clear markings, audio, and Braille
messaging
 Leading pedestrian intervals at signalized
intersections for pedestrians to establish
their presence in the crosswalks before
vehicles proceed
Site-specific recommendations are provided for each intersection.

1. El Camino Real/Page Mill Road

The intersection of El Camino Real and Page Mill Road will be redesigned with specific transit, pedestrian and bicycle elements.

The eastbound right turn slip lane from Page Mill Road to El Camino Real will be demolished, tightening the turning radius, and thereby reducing vehicular turn speeds and pedestrian crossing distances.

Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated space for bicyclists on El Camino Real, and they will also receive dedicated signal phasing to reduce conflicts with right-turning vehicles when crossing Page Mill Road. Red pavement markings will also indicate that buses can use the right-turn lanes to proceed forward across the intersection to far side bus stops with new transit boarding islands.

Gateway Intersection 1:

El Camino Real and Page Mill Road
The intersection of El Camino Real and Page
Mill Road will be redesigned with specific transit,
pedestrian and bicycle elements.

At built-out, the eastbound right turn slip lane
from Page Mill Road to El Camino Real would
be removed, tightening the turning radius, and
thereby reducing vehicular turn speeds and
pedestrian crossing distances. In the near-term,
the County has a plan to enhace this intersection
without removal of the right-turn pork chop at
the Palo Alto square corner.

Separated bicycle lanes will provide dedicated
space for bicyclists on El Camino Real, and they
will also receive dedicated signal phasing to
reduce conflicts with right-turning vehicles when
crossing Page Mill Road. Red pavement markings
will also indicate that buses can use the right-turn
lanes to proceed forward across the intersection
to far side bus stops with new transit boarding
islands.

Figure 55 El Camino Real and Page Mill Road Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp
Bus Lane
Sidewalk
Bicycle Lane
Legend
El Camino Real
Page Mill Rd
72 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 73
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
135

Packet Pg. 322 of 554

Gateway Intersection 2:

El Camino Real and Olive Avenue
The intersection of El Camino Real and Olive
Avenue would be redesigned with high visibility
marked crosswalks and bicycle elements would
be painted across all approaches. While a traffic
signal is not proposed for this intersection, other
strategies should be explored to ensure improved
pedestrian and bicycle access and safety across
El Camino Real.

Figure 56 El Camino Real and Olive Avenue Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp
Sidewalk
Bicycle Lane
Legend
Gateway Intersection 3:

El Camino Real and Portage Avenue / Hansen Way
Figure 57 El Camino Real, Hansen Way, Portage Avenue Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp
Sidewalk
Bicycle Lane
Legend
Both slip lanes entering and exiting Hansen
Way from El Camino Real would be closed and
redesigned to include a dedicated bicycle cut-out
to cross El Camino Real. Separated bicycle lanes
will provide dedicated space to cyclists along El
Camino Real.

The existing northbound bus stop would be
relocated to the far side of Portage Avenue with
dedicated boarding islands separating transit
users from cyclists. All existing crosswalks would
be repainted to be high visibility, and the existing
crosswalk at Portage Avenue will be straightened
across El Camino Real.

Portage Avenue is currently proposed to be
bicycle boulevard and woonerf. Alternatively, a
two-way bikeway on Portage Avenue from Park
Boulevard to El Camino Real may be included in
the final design of this intersection.
74 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 75
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
136

Packet Pg. 323 of 554

STREETS
Gateway Intersection 4:

Lambert Avenue and Ash Street
A raised crosswalk with advance yield lines would
be located on the east side of the intersection.

This will provide a direct connection for the
proposed path along Matadero Creek between
John Boulware Park and the proposed park
on the NVCAP site. The segment of Ash Street
adjacent to Boulware Park is being removed and
will become a part of the park.

Figure 58 Lambert Avenue and Ash Street Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp
Sidewalk
Matadero Creek
Legend
Gateway Intersection 5:

Park Boul vard and Portage Avenue
This intersection is the primary access point
into the woonerf along Portage Avenue. The
intersection would be stop-controlled and have
high visibility crosswalks on all approaches.
“North Ventura” gateway signage should be
installed at the entrance to the woonerf.

Figure 59 Park Boulevard and Portage Avenue Conceptual Intersection Design ADA Ramp
Sidewalk
Bicycle Lane
Legend
76 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 77
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
137

Packet Pg. 324 of 554

STREETS
Other Intersection Improvements
Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard
Page Mill Road/Park Boulevard was recently
redesigned as part of the construction of
adjacent development. While vehicle volumes
are currently quite low there today, they are
projected to increase over time.

To support the transition to a more pedestrian
and bicycle-friendly neighborhood, additional
safety treatments such as leading pedestrian
intervals, advance stop bars, and a “bike box” for
northbound Park Boulevard may be considered.

Page Mill Road and Ash Street
A hybrid beacon or full traffic signal and a
marked crosswalk should be installed at this
location to support pedestrians and bicyclists
crossing Page Mill Road. Coordination with Santa
Clara County would be needed to determine if a
signal or crossing is feasible.

This page is intentionally left blank
78 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 79
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
138

Packet Pg. 325 of 554

Street Sections
Park Boulevard
Park Boulevard is a priority north-south bicycle
and pedestrian street that connects the NVCAP
Plan Area to the California Avenue Caltrain
Station and terminates at the California Avenue
Business District. The street emphasizes multi-
modal transportation with wide pedestrian
sidewalks, bi-directional buffered bike lanes, and
a two-way flow of vehicles is maintained. Park
Boulevard is designated as a citywide pollinator
pathway, the design of the street prioritizes
a connected canopy of trees and a lush,
landscaped streetscape to support the health
and comfort of both people and wildlife.

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on Park
Boulevard.

Frontage / Setback Western Edge: 20 Feet from
Property Line
Eastern Edge: 5 Feet from
Property Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
4-4.5 Feet
Bicycle Facility Separated Buffered Bike Lanes
5 Feet Bike Lane
2-3 Feet Buffer
Parking / Loading No On-Street Parking
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
One Lane in Each Direction

4.4.1 Str eet Design
Guidelines:

4.4.2 Widen th e Pedestrian Throughway
Streetscape elements should include:
• Street trees that can create a connective
canopy at full maturity
• Lighting and wayfinding that provides a
neighborhood branding/identity opportunity
• Seating/rest areas for residents and
commuters
• Green Stormwater Infrastructure in the
setbacks, landscape/furniture zone, and if
space allows, the separated buffered bike
lane.

Standards:

Figure 60 Typical Park Boulevard Section
Table 7 Park Boulevard Street Design
western edge eastern edge

4.4 The following street sections, which include street design standards and guidelines, are intended to illustrate the long term vision of the NVCAP mobility network. The design of the new streets will be built out over time.
80 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 81
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
139

Packet Pg. 326 of 554

Olive Avenue
Olive Avenue is a priority east-west pedestrian
and bicycle street that creates a direct link
between the commercial activity on El Camino
Real with the multi-modal mobility on Park
Boulevard. Olive Avenue has two distinct street
designs:

Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street, the
street is configured to accommodate comfortable
sidewalks and two-way vehicle travel lanes. Due
to the low traffic volumes and speeds on Olive
Avenue, the street is designated as a bicycle
boulevard which allows cyclists to ride with traffic.

The setback on the northern edge of the street is
20 feet to protect the existing green stormwater
infrastructure along the 395 Page Mill Road
property.
1 2

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide a
primary entry or entries on Olive
Avenue except for properties that
are abutting Park Boulevard or
Ash Street.

Frontage / Setback Northern Edge: 20 Feet (Existing
Bioswale)
Southern Edge: 10 Feet from
Property Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge: 3 Feet
Southern Edge: 4 Feet
Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard
10 Feet
Parking / Loading 2 Lanes of On-Street Parking
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Lane in Each Direction
Building Entries New development shall provide a
primary entry or entries on Olive
Avenue except for properties that
are abutting El Camino Real or
Ash Street.

Frontage / Setback 10 Feet from Property Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge: 3 Feet
Southern Edge: 4 Feet
Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard
10 Feet
Parking / Loading 2 Lanes of On-Street Parking
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Lane in Each Direction

4.4.3 Str eet Design
Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Between Ash Street and El Camino Real1 2 Standards:

Figure 61 Typical Olive Avenue section between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Figure 62 Typical Olive Avenue section between Ash Street and El Camino Real 1 2
Table 8 Olive Avenue Street Design
northern edge southern edge
Between Ash Street and El Camino Real, the
street remains a two-way street. Due to the low
traffic volumes and speeds on Olive Avenue, the
street is designated as a bicycle boulevard which
allows cyclists to ride with traffic. The on-street
parking on both sides of the street is maintained.
northern edge southern edge
82 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 83
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
140

Packet Pg. 327 of 554

Ash Street
Ash Street is a quiet, predominately residential
street, which provides a critical north-south
connection throughout the Plan Area. A desired
pedestrian connection across Olive Avenue to
Acacia Avenue will provide seamless access
from Page Mill Road to public park, Matadero
Creek, and existing community amenities such as
Bouleware Park. Ash Street has two distinct street
designs:

Between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue,
the street is converted from a two-way street
to a one-way southbound street. This change
prevents northbound traffic on El Camino Real
from using the neighborhood as a cut-through to
travel eastbound on Page Mill Road. The western
edge of the street features a wide shared-use
path for pedestrians and northbound cyclists.

Setback
5’
8’
Clear
Walkway
4’
Tree
Bed
SetbackSetback Setback
Existing Property Line
Existing Property Line
Existing Property Line
Existing Property Line
5’ 5’
10’5’12’
Shared
Path Shared Lane
Tree
Bed
8’
Clear
Walkway
Ash Street (Between Page Mill and Olive, Looking towards North) 10’5’ 10’
Clear
Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane
Ash Street (Between Olive and Lambert, Looking towards North) 5’
40’40’
Tree
Bed
8’
1 2

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on Ash
Street except for properties that
are abutting Page Mill or Olive
Avenue.

Frontage / Setback Western Edge: Maximum 5 Feet
from Property Line
Eastern Edge: Maximum 5 Feet
from Property Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone Eastern Edge:

Shared Use Path: 12 Feet
Western Edge: 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Western Edge: 5 Feet
Eastern Edge: 5 Feet
Bicycle Facility Southbound:

Bicycle Boulevard
10 Feet
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Southbound Lane
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on Ash
Street except for properties that
are abutting Portage Avenue,
Lambert Avenue or Acacia
Avenue.

Frontage / Setback Maximum 5 Feet from Property
Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Western Edge: n/a
Eastern Edge: 4 Feet
Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard: 10 Feet
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Lane in Each Direction

4.4.4 Str eet Design
Between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue Between Acacia Avenue and Lambert Avenue1 2 Standards:

Figure 63 Typical Ash Street section between Page Mill Road and Olive Avenue Figure 64 Typical Ash Street section between Acacia Avenue and Lambert Avenue 1 2
Table 9 Ash Street Street Design
western edge eastern edge
western edge eastern edge
Between Olive Avenue and Lambert Avenue, the
street segment is designed with bi-directional
sidewalks and vehicle lanes. The vehicle travel
lanes are also designated as bicycle boulevards,
where cyclists share the road with vehicles.
84 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 85
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
141

Packet Pg. 328 of 554

Acacia Avenue
Acacia Avenue is an east-west street, primarily
serving as service street for the Plan Area. The
street extends from El Camino Real to Ash Street,
at which point it becomes a private driveway for
the 340 Portage site. The street design for the
segment between Ash Street and El Camino Real
consists of bi-directional pedestrian sidewalks
along with two-way vehicle lanes. On-street
parking is maintained on the southern edge of
the street.
10’8’ 10’
Clear
Walkway Drive Lane Drive Lane
8’
Clear
Walkway
8’
On-Street
Parking
48’
Setback Setback
Tree
Bed
4’
Existing Property Line
Existing Property Line
5’ 5’
Acacia Street (Looking towards East)

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries
on Acacia Avenue except for
properties that are abutting El
Camino Real or Park Boulevard.

Frontage / Setback Maximum 5 Feet from Property
Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge: 4 Feet
Southern Edge: n/a
Bicycle Facility n/a
Parking / Loading Southern Edge: 1 Lane of On-
Street Parking
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Lane in Each Direction

4.4.5 Str eet Design
Standards:

Between Ash Street and El Camino Real
Figure 65 Typical Acacia Avenue Section
Table 10 Acacia Avenue Street Design
northern edge southern edge
86 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 87
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
142

Packet Pg. 329 of 554

Pepper Avenue
Pepper Avenue is a slow residential street,
extending from El Camino Real to Ash Street.

The street design supports existing residents with
wide, tree-lined sidewalks and two-way traffic
lanes. On-street parking is maintained on either
side.

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on
Pepper Avenue except for
properties that are abutting Ash
Street.

Frontage / Setback
Maximum 10 Feet from Property
Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 5 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge: 4.5 Feet
Southern Edge: 4.5 Feet
Bicycle Facility n/a
Parking / Loading 2 Lanes of On-Street Parking
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Lane in Each Direction

4.4.6 Str eet Design
Standards:

Between Ash Street and El Camino Real
Figure 66 Typical Pepper Avenue Section
Table 11 Pepper Avenue Street Design
northern edge southern edge
88 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 89
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
143

Packet Pg. 330 of 554

Portage Avenue
Portage Avenue is a priority east-west bicycle
and pedestrian street which becomes a critical
citywide link from Park Boulevard connecting the
California Avenue Caltrain and Business District to
the existing bicycle infrastructure on Hansen Way
to the Stanford Research Park. Portage Avenue
has two distinct street designs:

Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street is the
Portage Avenue woonerf, ‘the front door’ for
the public park and the Cannery building. The
woonerf, which will be a publicly accessible
private street is an integrated, curbless street,
shared by pedestrians, bicyclists, and low-
speed vehicles. The street incorporates outdoor
furnishings such as trees, planters, green
stormwater infrastructure and seating to ensure
this space fosters community gatherings, events,
retail, and other flexible uses. The city may
consider a shared-use path on Portage Avenue.

Between Ash Street and El Camino Real,
Portage Avenue takes on a more typical street
configuration. The street design includes two
1 2
Setback Setback
Existing Property Line
Existing Property Line
10’8’ 10’
Clear
Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane
8’
Clear
Walkway
15’
Tree Bed
Portage Avenue (Between Ash and ECR, Looking towards East) 8’
On-Street
Parking
59’
5’ 5’
10’8’ 10’
Clear
Walkway Shared Lane Shared Lane
8’
Clear
Walkway
15’
Tree Bed /
Outdoor rooms
Portage Avenue (Between Ash and ECR, Looking towards East) 8’
Street Life /
Flower beds
59’
Setback
Existing Property Line
Existing Property Line
5’
sidewalks with a wide furnishing zone on the
northern edge of the street. Two-way traffic
lanes are retained with on-street parking on the
southern edge of the street. Due to the low traffic
volumes and speeds, this segment of Portage is
designated as a bicycle boulevard, where cyclists
share the road with vehicles.

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on
Portage Avenue except for
properties that are abutting Park
Boulevard.

Frontage / Setback Northern Edge: Maximum 5 Feet
from Property Line
Southern Edge: n/a
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge: 15 Feet
Southern Edge: 8 Feet
Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard
10 Feet
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
Building Entries New development shall provide a
primary entry or entries on Olive
Avenue except for properties that
are abutting El Camino Real.

Frontage / Setback Maximum 5 Feet from Property
Line
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge: 15 Feet
Southern Edge: n/a
Bicycle Facility Bicycle Boulevard
10 Feet
Parking / Loading Southern Edge: 1 Lane of On-
Street Parking
Vehicle Travel Lanes 10 Feet
1 Lane in Each Direction

4.4.7 Str eet Design
Standards:

Between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Between Ash Street and El Camino Real1 2 Figure 67 Typical Portage Avenue section between Park Boulevard and Ash Street Figure 68 Typical Portage Avenue section between Ash Street and El Camino Real 1 2
Table 12 Portage Avenue Street Design
northern edge southern edge
northern edge southern edge
90 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 91
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
144

Packet Pg. 331 of 554

Guidelines:

4.4.8 Str eetscape Elements
Streetscape elements of the Portage Avenue
woonerf include:
• A row of street trees on either side of the main
travel way to designate pedestrian priority areas
adjacent to building frontages
• Signage emphasizing the presence of
pedestrians and bicyclists
• Textured or permeable pavement designed to
slow vehicle speeds and provide stormwater
management benefits
• Pedestrian-scale lighting
• Seating areas
• Landscaping and green stormwater
infrastructure
• Design elements that highlight the community’s
vision or character
• Public art that will enhance the pedestrian
experience and reflect the community’s unique
character.

STREETS
Figure 69 Streetscape elements like double row of trees, textured pavement, pedestrian scale lighting , and seating encourages a low-carbon, welcoming neighborhood environment. 92 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 93
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
145

Packet Pg. 332 of 554

Lambert Avenue
Lambert Avenue is the southern edge of the
plan area. Lambert Avenue is improved on the
northern half of the existing street to enhance
the pedestrian experience along the edge of
the NVCAP site boundary. The existing vehicular
travel lane is narrowed, and on-street parking is
eliminated to make space for a wider pedestrian
thoroughfare and generous furnishing zone for
enhanced bio-retention area and dense canopy
trees.

El Camino Real
El Camino Real is a regional arterial street as
well as the western edge of the plan area. El
Camino Real is improved on the eastern half
of the existing street. New development is
required to setback by 5 feet in order to provide
a wider pedestrian sidewalk and furnishing
zone to support a more comfortable pedestrian
experience.

The configuration of the roadway will be
determined in coordination with Caltrans
independently of the NVCAP.

STREETS
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on
Lambert Avenue except for
properties that are abutting Park
Boulevard or El Camino Real.

Frontage / Setback Northern Edge:

Maximum 5 Feet
Pedestrian Clear Zone 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Northern Edge:

9.5 Feet
Vehicle Travel Lanes Westbound Lane
10 Feet

4.4.9 Str eet Design
Standards:

Between Park Boulevard and El Camino Real1
Building Entries New development shall provide
a primary entry or entries on El
Camino Real.

Frontage / Setback 0 - 10 feet to create an 8 - 12-foot effective sidewalk width
Pedestrian Clear Zone Eastern Edge: 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Eastern Edge: 4 Feet

4.4.10 Str eet Design
Standards:

Between Page Mill Road and Lambert Avenue1
Figure 70 Typical Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Section Figure 71 Typical El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Section Table 13 Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Design Table 14 El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Design 94 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 95
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
146

Packet Pg. 333 of 554

East
West
North
South
Park Boulevard
Ash Street
Ash Street Olive Avenue
Acacia Avenue Portage Avenue
Pepper Avenue
El Camino Real
Page Mill Road
Page Mill Road
Page Mill Road is one of arterial streets in the City
as well as the northern edge of the plan area.

Page Mill Road is improved on the southern half
of the existing street to enhance the pedestrian
experience along the edge of the NVCAP Plan
Area boundary. New development will provide
a wider pedestrian sidewalk and furnishing
zone to support a more comfortable pedestrian
experience. In order to provide a consistent width,
the setback for new development will vary based
on existing site conditions.

The configuration of the roadway will be
determined in coordination with Santa Clara
County.

Building Entries New development shall provide a
primary entry or entries on Page
Mill road except for properties
that are abutting Park Boulevard
or El Camino Real.

Frontage / Setback 0 - 10 feet to create an 8 - 12-foot effective sidewalk width
Pedestrian Clear Zone Southern Edge: 8 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Southern Edge: 4 Feet

4.4.11 Str eet Design
Standards:

Between Park Boulevard and El Camino Real1
Figure 72 Typical Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Section
Table 15 Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Design

STREETS
This page is intentionally left blank
96 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 97
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
147

Packet Pg. 334 of 554

Publicly Accessible Private Connections
New publicly accessible connections on private
property are intended to support greater porosity
and walkability throughout the Plan Area. These
connections can break up large ‘super-blocks’
and provide alternative routes for residents to
move through the Plan Area. These connections
include mid-block paseos in between the
Cannery building, pedestrian pathways within
the rear setback of new development along El
Camino Real, and pedestrian pathways through
the 395 Page Mill property.

Building Entries New development shall provide
a secondary entry or entries on
mid-block paseos.

Pedestrian Clear Zone Shared Use Path: 20 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
3 Feet
Vehicle Travel Lanes 26 Feet
Emergency Vehicle Access
Building Entries New development shall provide
a secondary entry or entries on
real setback pathways.

Frontage / Setback Rear Setback:

Minimum 22 Feet
Pedestrian Clear Zone Shared Use Path: 20 Feet
Landscape / Furniture
Zone
Rear Green Buffer : 10 Feet

4.10.1 Str eet Design
Guidelines:

Mid-Block Paseo Rear Setback Pathway1 2

STREETS
Existing Property Line
Right of Way Centerline
Setback
10’7.5’10’
Clear
Walkway Drive LaneTree Bed
Lambert St. (Looking towards East)

27.5 3’20’
Shared Path
Planter
Bed
26’
3’
Planter
Bed
Publically Accessible Private Streets
Existing Property Line
10’16’
Shared Path Green Setback
5’
22’
Existing Property Line
Right of Way Centerline
Setback
10’7.5’10’
Clear
Walkway Drive LaneTree Bed
Lambert St. (Looking towards East)

27.5 3’20’
Shared Path
Planter
Bed
26’
3’
Planter
Bed
Publically Accessible Private Streets
Existing Property Line
10’16’
Shared Path Green Setback
5’
22’
Figure 73 Typical mid-block connection
section
Figure 74 Typical rear setback connection section
Table 16 Mid-Block Paseo Design Table 17 Rear Setback Pathway Design 98 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 99
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
148

Packet Pg. 335 of 554

The North Ventura neighborhood offers
diverse transit options, including two bus stops
located at El Camino Real/Portage Avenue and
Page Mill Road/El Camino Real. Additionally,
residents within a 15-minute walking distance
can access services from four transit operators,
including VTA, AC Transit, Caltrain, and Stanford
Marguerite.

Future plans prioritize designing user-friendly,
accessible, and safe routes to enhance transit
accessibility within the neighborhood.

MOBILITY
Transit Access
Project Goal
Transit, Pedestrian, and
Bicycle Connections
Create and enhance well-defined
connections to transit, pedestrian, and
bicycle facilities, including connections to
the Caltrain Station, Park Boulevard, and
El Camino Real.

4.5 Guidelines:

4.5.2 W ayfinding Signage
Wayfinding signage throughout the North
Ventura neighborhood should clearly and
concisely display major designation and
their distances, available transit services
and other available transportation options.

The signage should be designed to be clear,
easy to understand, and visually appealing,
as well as reflective of a unique North
Ventural neighborhood aesthetic, potentially
incorporation landmark desgination.

4.5.2 Mobilit y Hub
The North Ventura mobility hub should be
located along Portage Avenue between El
Camino Real and the intersection of Portage
Avenue and Ash Street. The mobility hub will
serve as a central location within the plan
area, providing access to various sustainable
transportation options and promoting mode
shift away from single-occupancy vehicles.

The mobility hub should be designed in
coordination with transit operators like AC
Transit and VTA to integrate their services and
ensure a seamless user experience. It will be
designed in accordance with the MTC’s Mobility
Hub Implementation Playbook and the City’s
design guidelines, which includes:
• Sustainable access and mobility to encourage
mode shift. Proposed amenities include:
• Transit shelters and waiting areas
• Bicycle parking facilities
• Shared mobility (bike share, scooter share, etc.)
access points
• Electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure
• Designated parking for car share services
Additional improvements relating to information
access can also improve the customer experience.

The proposed amenities should be considered to
improve information access:
• Real-time travel information signage and
interactive displays
• Area maps and bulletins promoting local
amenities and events
• Monitoring systems to measure ridership,
mobility, security, and public life metrics
• Digital and physical wayfinding tools
Standards:

4.5.1 Bus St op Amenities
Bus stops shall be designed in accordance with
agency-wide standards established by VTA and
AC Transit, incorporating the latest industry best
practices. Coordination with the appropriate
agency is required.

In accordance with AC Transit’s Multimodal
Corridor Guidelines and VTA’s Better Bus Stop
Program, the contextually appropriate bus stop
enhancements and amenities include:
• Bus shelters protecting riders from the
elements
• Energy-efficient lighting to ensure visibility and
enhance safety
• Comfortable seating
• Digital signage with real-time information
informing riders of available service
• Posted information with route information
and service schedules, available in English,
Spanish, and other locally prevalent
languages as well as braille placards
• Audio capabilities to communicate real-time
information to hearing-impaired riders
100 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 101
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
149

Packet Pg. 336 of 554

TDM strategies can be effective at encouraging
fewer trips made by single-occupancy vehicles
(SOV). An effective TDM plan ensures that
alternative modes of transportation, such as
walking, bicycling, public transit, or other forms
of shared mobility, are made available to site
occupants and nearby community members.

While reducing SOV trips is a key goal, TDM
enhancements offer additional benefits like
environmental improvements, safer streets, and
a more enjoyable public realm. Beyond local
planning alignment, regulations like BAAQMD
Rule 1 and SB 743 mandate TDM plans for specific
developments. NVCAP’s TDM plan should comply
with the City’s VMT regulations and program
recommendations, and utilize standard metrics
like those from the California Air Pollution Control
Officers Association (CAPCOA) for evaluation and
VMT calculations.

Standards:

4.7.1 VMT R eduction
All employers and major residential
developments within the plan area shall achieve
a 30 percent minimum reduction below ITE
rates in peak hour motor vehicle trips, using the
Example TDM Strategies Menu in Table 21.

4.72 Palo Alto Transportation Management
Association
All employers and major residential
developments within the plan area shall be
members of the Palo Alto Transportation
Management Association (PATMA).

MOBILITY
Transportation Demand
Management

4.7 Vehicular
Circulation and
Parking
The North Ventura Mobility Framework aims to
create a vibrant and sustainable neighborhood
by prioritizing local traffic circulation,
discouraging cut-through traffic, and providing
diverse and efficient parking solutions. This
framework balances the needs of residents,
businesses, and visitors through a combination of
street design strategies, parking regulations, and
innovative solutions like woonerfs and private
access aisles.

Standards:

4.6.1 On e-Way Street
Ash Street from Page Mill Road to Olive Avenue
shall be one-way southbound to help prevent
northbound traffic on El Camino Real from using
the neighborhood as a cut-through to travel
eastbound on Page Mill Road.

4.6.2 Minim um Parking
No minimum parking requirements shall be
established for the plan area in accordance with
California Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097).

4.6.3 Sur face Parking
No more than 10 percent of new surface parking
shall be allowed within the plan area. Where
new buildings are not proposed, existing surface
parking spaces can remain to support remaining
commercial offices.

4.6.4 Str eet Parking
No new street parking shall be constructed along
new developments. In addition, street parking
shall be restricted near intersections to ensure
safe turning movements for large vehicles and
emergency vehicles. Street parking shall be
maintained in front of single-family homes on
Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue.

Guidelines:

4.6.5 T raffic Calming
As a traffic calming measures, the following
strategies are recomended:
• Olive and Lambert Avenues: speed humps
and raised crosswalks to maintain low vehicle
speeds
• Pepper Avenue: A chicane, which is an offset
curve to the road
• Portage Avenue woonerf: Vehicle entrances
should be only wide enough to accommodate
one vehicle at a time. Trees or landscaping
is recommended to create this bottleneck to
restrict the flow of vehicles.

4.6.6 V ehicles on Woonerf
Vehicular traffic on the woonerf on Portage
Avenue should be permitted but discouraged.

Acacia Avenue from Ash Street to Park
Boulevard will be a private aisle for accessing
residential frontage on Acacia Avenue for
parking and unloading.

4.6.7 Sh ort-Term Parking
Short-term parking to support new
ground-floor retail and active uses in new
developments should be located on the ground
or basement levels of these developments.

4.6.8 P arking Management Strategies
In addition, the following parking management
strategies could be implemented to mitigate
parking impacts:
• Parking time limits
• Unbundled Parking
• Shared parking locations
• Carshare memberships and designated
parking spots

4.6.9 Driveways
Driveways should be located along side-streets
and/or consolidated wherever possible and as
redevelopment occurs to minimize conflicts with
bicyclists and pedestrians

4.6 102 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 103
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
150

Packet Pg. 337 of 554

MOBILITY
Strategy Description Responsible Entity
Active Transportation
Shared bike or scooter service Conventional or electric, docked or dockless bikes and
scooters can increase first-/
last-mile connections and offer
alternative transportation
Third party operators
City staff to determine
regulations, applicable geo-
fencing
Bicycle support facilities Supportive facilities such
as short-/long-term bicycle
parking, showers, and
lockers that increase active
transportation trips
Developer
Major employers or residential
tenants
Shared Mobility
Car share For people who do not own
cars, car share can offer vehicle
access without significantly
increasing GHG emissions and
necessary parking.

Vehicles can be provided to
tenants of certain buildings, or
through designated parking
spaces such as dedicated
on- street spots noted with
signage.

Third party operators
City staff to determine
regulations
Shuttle service and new
stops
With increased residential
and employment density,
additional shuttle stops may
be necessary. Major employers
or residential developments
in the area may also operate
shuttle service that would serve
the neighborhood.

The upcoming City on-
demand shuttle service may
also necessitate additional
designated stops.

Stanford shuttle operator
City shuttle operator
Major employers or residential
tenants offering shuttles
Parking
Electric vehicle charging
facilities
Encourage electric vehicle
usage to decrease GHG
emissions by providing
necessary charging facilities
Developer
Table 18 Example TDM Strategies Menu
Strategy Description Responsible Entity
Transportation Program Coordination
Membership in the Palo Alto
Transportation Management
Association (PATMA)
Joining the PATMA can provide
developers, major employers,
or residential tenants with
access to transportation
resources available for
community members. The
PATMA also works closely with
the City to offer events and
other relevant programming.

Developer and/or tenants
(employers, residential)
Carpool resources Resources for organizing
neighborhood carpools to
nearby major activity centers
Developer and/or tenants
(employers, residential)*
Active transportation
incentives
Resources such as bike/
scooter share coupons, or
bicycle purchase subsidies
can encourage active
transportation
Developer and/or tenants
(employers, residential)*
Shared mobility incentives Resources such as rideshare
discounts, carshare discounts,
free or subsidized transit passes
can decrease trips made by a
single occupancy vehicle
Developer and/or tenants
(employers, residential)*
Promotional materials on
transportation offerings
(flyers, emails, websites, etc.)
Resources advertising
alternative modes of
transportation can raise
awareness to people who
primarily rely on their car
Developer and/or tenants
(employers, residential)*
Bulletin boards or kiosks
displaying transportation
alternatives
Participation in City-
wide events encouraging
alternative modes of
transportation
Encouraging major employers,
residential developments,
and community members to
participate in City-wide events,
such as the annual Bike to
Wherever Day, can expose
people to alternative modes of
transportation
Developer and/or tenants
(employers, residential)*
*If responsible entities decides
to join, PATMA can be a facility/
resource provider.
104 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 105
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
151

Packet Pg. 338 of 554

5.1 P ublic Park

5.2 Mat adero Creek
Parks and Open Space
5 NVCAP’s ecological framwork takes direct input from
the community and working group who advocated for
the need for more reacreational space for residents in
the community and places to be outdoors and gather.

In addition, the ecological framework takes inspiration from the City’s Sustanability and Climate Action Plan,
identifying opportunities for renewal, restoration, carbon sequestration, and growth of the natural environment.

The future streets, parks, natural areas,
and buildings will restore and enhance
habitat and pollinator pathways,
and provide flood protection and
stormwater management, cleaner
air and cleaner water, and healthier
habitats for current and future
generations.

In addition, the future parks and
natural areas will provide much
needed recreational and outdoor
space where the community can
gather.

The Ecological Framework includes
the following:
• Public Park
• Matadero Creek
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
152

Packet Pg. 339 of 554

5 .1
Public Park
Located in the southeast corner of the plan
area, approximately two acres of public open
space is proposed. The proposed naturalization
of Matadero Creek between Park Boulevard
and Lambert Avenue will serve as the
organizing framework for the park’s design and
neighborhood destination, inviting Palo Alto
residents, employees, and visitors to enjoy access
to recreational activities, habitat, and inclusive
community programming. Bounded by the
proposed Portage Avenue woonerf and Park
Boulevard, the proposed public park is seamlessly
integrated into the adopted citywide Pedestrian
and Bicycle Plan. The design of the proposed
Portage Avenue woonerf supports a natural
extension of the park, directly connecting to the
Cannery Building.

Standards:

5.1.1 P ark Acreage and Dimensions
An approximately two-acre public park is
proposed in the plan. The details of the public
park and open space will be fully developed
in the future when it becomes a project, with a
public process. The concept of the public park is
included in the plan and is generally described in
Figure 71.

5.1.2 Circulation
All multi-use paths should form a continuous
path connecting all points of entry as illustrated
in Figure 71.

Programmed spaces should connect to the plan
area mobility network via multi-use paths.

The multi-use paths network would create a safe
connection across Lambert Street to Boulware
Park.

The minimum width of the multi-use path will be
12 feet.

5.1.3 P ark Gateways
The park could accommodate five points of entry
to connect with the pedestrian and bike mobility
network around the park. The character of these
gateways to the park is further outlined in Figure

71. 5.1.4 Utilities
Electrical service, potable water, and sewer
supply should be provided to accommodate
varied events such as movie nights, festivals to
serve small park structures; and along the park
trails and the Picnic Area.

5.1.5 D esign Approval
Once the park becomes a project, the design
of the park would be subject to the typical City
review process including review by the Parks and
Recreation Commission.

Figure 75 Conceptual Plan of Location of Park Gateways and Circulation Paths Park Gateways
Access to park

SAFE CONNECTION

TO BOULWARE PARK

COMMUNITY

GARDENS

MULTI-USE

OPEN SPACE

ACTIVE ZONES

OBSERVATION DECK
Viewing shed
Legend
Project Goals
Sustainability and the
Environment
Protect and enhance the environment,
while addressing the principles of
sustainability.

Balance of
Community Interests
Balance community-wide objectives with
the interests of neighborhood residents
and minimize displacement of existing
residents.

PARKS
106 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 107
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
153

Packet Pg. 340 of 554

Guidelines:

5.1.6 Programming
Active Park programming may include but is
not limited to a dog park, outdoor fitness area,
natural habitat area, community garden, or
amphitheater.

In addition to active programming, park design
should accommodate passive uses such as
reading and picnicking.

When siting park elements, consider types of
activity, periods of use or vacancy, availability of
sun or shade, and the differing needs of a diverse
range of visitors such as small children, adult
athletes, and dog owners.

The park should include amenities to support the
commercial environment on Portage Avenue such
as flexible seating areas, social gathering spaces,
play spaces, and public art.

Surrounded by development on more than one
side, the program elements should be designed
to be protected from wind and down-drafts
from buildings with strategic tree planting and
thoughtful siting of passive programming.

5.1.7 Nat ive Plantings
Where possible, pollinator friendly native plants
should be incorporated. Refer to Valley Water’s
Guidelines & Standards for Land Use Near
Streams Chapter 4 (Design Guides for Guidelines
and Standards) for the placement of native
plants along the creek.

Figure 76 An example of passive park programming
Figure 77 An example of active park programming
PARKS
108 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 109
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
154

Packet Pg. 341 of 554

5.2 Matadero
Creek
The Plan envisions the full naturalization of
Matadero Creek between Park Boulevard and
Lambert Avenue. The flood channel is widened to
a maximum of 100 feet riparian corridor serving
maximum geomorphic form and ecological
function. Leading with resilience in mind, the
design offers the creek the capability to convey
100-year flood events.

The full details of the renaturalization of the creek
will be developed in the future when it becomes
a project. Appropriate City review process,
including a public process and coordination with
applicable agencies will be required.

Standards:

5.2.1 Cr eek Buffer
The creek section between Park Boulevard
and Lambert Avenue is buffered by a 100-foot
riparian corridor, at maximum. To determine the
defined parameters for the buffer floodwalls,
further City coordination is required.

5.2.2 Coordination
Coordination with Santa Clara Valley Water
District shall be required to ensure the
renaturalization of the creek implement
adequate measures and standards to reduce
impact to the existing channel.

5.2.3 Circulation
The riparian corridor shall maintain public access
on both sides of the creek front and be designed
to embrace the Matadero creek as a central
feature.

Lambert Avenue bridge is recommended to be
replaced with a new bridge spanning 100 feet.

The recommended location shown in Figure
74 will connect Portage Avenue and Lambert
Avenue.

5.2.4 Win d Protection
As the riparian corridor is 10 feet lower than the
surrounding terrain, it should be designed to
be protected from wind and down-drafts from
surrounding areas with strategic tree planting
and thoughtful design of the shared trail routes.

5.2.5 Ecology
Impervious surfaces shall be discouraged in the
100 foot buffer as per Figure 74.

Plant selections shall reinforce the native and
surrounding ecology and promote habitat
development.

PARKS
Figure 78 Conceptual Plan of the Matadero Creek buffer, circulation, and gateways 100 FEET RIPARIAN

CORRIDOR
10 FEET

GRADE DROP

NATURALIZED CREEK
Riparian Corridor Gateways

NO IMPERVIOUS SURFACES
IN 100 FEET BUFFER
Shared Path

PUBLIC ACCESS

ALONG CREEK
Riparian Corridor Buffer Boundary
Legend
Project Goals
Community Facilities
and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate development
of new community facilities and
infrastructure with private development,
recognizing both the community’s needs
and that such investments can increase
the cost of housing.

Sustainability and the
Environment
Protect and enhance the environment,
while addressing the principles of
sustainability.
110 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 111
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
155

Packet Pg. 342 of 554

PARKS
Figure 79 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a constrained concrete trapezoidal channel. Figure 80 A naturalized creek has the opportunity to provide multi-use trails and habitat areas.

5.2.6 G ateways
Gateways to the corridor shall be recommended
at the following key intersections. See Figure 74.

Sloped walks, terraces, stairs, or ramps for bicycle
and pedestrian circulation shall be a key feature
at these gateways, integrated with the flood
wall designed to connect across the 10 feet
grade change between the public park and the
Matadero creek riparian corridor. This will ensure
that pedestrians and bicyclists can access both
the park and the riparian trail.

Gateway access to multi-use paths should be
designed to be ADA accessible to traverse the 10
feet grade change from the public park to the
creek.

5.2.7 Flo odwalls or Retaining Walls
Concrete floodwalls or retaining walls shall be
designed to allow for vegetation to the extent
feasible.

5.2.8 Utilities
Electrical service and potable water shall be
provided along the trails.

Guidelines:

5.2.9 P ublic Art
Gateways, bridge, and other park amenities may
integrate public art/structures to indicate major
entry points, when appropriate.

5.2.10 Th e Matadero Creek Bridge
Observation areas should be integrated with the
design of the new bridge.

Educational placards should inform the public on
the re-naturalization of Matadero Creek.
112 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 113
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
156

Packet Pg. 343 of 554

6.1 Building Heigh ts and Massing

6.2 R etail and Active Frontage

6.3 P ortage Avenue Frontage

6.4 R esidential Frontage

6.5 Sust ainable Design
Site and Building Design
6 NVCAP’s urban form framework champions the design of
buildings that are respectful neighbors, human-scaled,
and embrace the street. New development will respond
to the surrounding context such as building up to El
Camino Real while creating a gentle transition to quieter residential portions of the neighborhood.

This chapter provides guidance on
the desired future built form and sets
aspirations for how new buildings
will contribute to the character of
the NVCAP as it continues to be
developed incrementally over time.

The key factors that contribute to good
building architecture: building mass
and bulk appearance; pedestrian-
friendly design of the ground level, and
visual interest created by architectural
articulation, the materiality of the
building, and sustainable design.

The standards and guidelines have
been organized to address these
key elements under the following
headings:
• Building Heights and Massing
• Building Frontages
• Sustainable Design
114 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 115
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
157

Packet Pg. 344 of 554

6.1 Building Heights
and Massing
Building form and massing have a crucial role
in forming NVCAP’s built environment as a
framework for a comfortable and exciting public
realm. Massing strategies reflected in NVCAP’s
architecture make associated building uses more
legible and well-organized. Massing regulations
such as allowable building heights and stepbacks
will support the gradual transition from taller
buildings along El Camino Real to quieter,
residential parts of the neighborhood.

Standards:

6.1.1 Buildin g Heights
All new development shall conform to Figure 78
for maximum allowable building heights.

6.1.2 Af fordable Housing Height Bonus
Through the City’s Housing Incentive Program
or the State Density Bonus, 100% below market
rate projects shall be eligible for additional bonus
height (up to 33 feet).

6.1.3 St epdown to Single-Family Residential
Based on the development standards of a
adjacent zoning district, new development shall
stepdown to existing single family residential.

Refer to the Palo Alto Municipal Code, as setback
and stepback requirements on side or rear lot
lines shall vary based on zoning. Daylight plane
height and slope shall be identical to those of the
most restrictive residential zoning district abutting
the lot line.

6.1.4 Utilities
Overhead public utilities shall be undergrounded
for buildings with roof edge heights over 27 feet
tall.

Guidelines:

6.1.5 C annery Building Roof Datum
Any adaptive re-use projects directly adjacent
to the Cannery may be allowed to match the
structure’s 36 foot roof datum. The consideration
of this additional 12 inches of height above what
is permitted will be part of the development
project’s discretionary review.

BUILDINGS
Figure 82 Allowable Height Map
Figure 81 An example of a daylight plane
requirement for mixed-use development
stepping down to single family residential
neighborhoods.
116 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 117
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
158

Packet Pg. 345 of 554

6.2 Retail and Active
Use Frontage
Ground floor retail and other active uses enliven
and activate streetscapes, enhancing the
public interface between new buildings and
the sidewalk. Within the Plan Area, the highest
concentration of retail and active uses are
located along El Camino Real. These ground
floor spaces are designed to accommodate a
wide variety of commercial spaces including local
shops, cafes, maker spaces, co-working spaces,
and professional services.

Active uses are listed on page 40 of Section 2.3
(Ground Floor Edges).

Standards:

6.2.1 El C amino Real Active Frontage
Ground floor active uses shall be required along
all new development fronting El Camino Real.

Refer to Section 2.3 for a map of ground floor
edges.

6.2.2 Gr ound Floor Retail Height
Ground floor retail floor to ceiling height shall be
a minimum of 14 feet.

6.2.3 Obje ctive Standards
For Corner Conditions, Primary Entries, Façade
Design, and Transparency, new development
shall adhere to Palo Alto Municipal Code,
Chapter 18.24 Contextual Design Criteria and
Objective Design Standards.

Guidelines:

6.2.4 P ark Boulevard
Ground floor active uses should be encouraged
for new development fronting Park Boulevard.

6.2.5 St orefront Frontages
Storefronts should create a fine grain of variety
along each street frontage, expressing the unique
identity of each tenant. Where active uses or
retail frontages are required or located, the
following design standards shall apply:
• Exterior windows on the ground floor
shall use transparent glazing to the extent
feasible. Low-e glass or minimal tinting to
achieve sun control is permitted, provided
the glazing appears transparent when
viewed from the ground level.
• Window coverings are not permitted on the
ground floor during typical business hours.

Where operations preclude transparency
(e.g., theaters) or where privacy requires
window coverings, sidewalk-facing frontage
shall include items of visual interest including
displays of merchandise or artwork; visual
access shall be provided to a minimum
interior depth of 3 feet.

6.1.5 Out door Rooms
Outdoor rooms notched into the ground floor
should be lined with active retail uses and have
ample space for spillover for outdoor dining,
murals, and retail displays.

BUILDINGS
Figure 83 Retail ground floors provides adequate floor to ceiling heights, transparency, and signage.

Figure 84 Ground floors can create notches of outdoor rooms to allow for lively spillover of retail.

Figure 85 Active ground floors provide openness,
transparency and a connection to the street.
118 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 119
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
159

Packet Pg. 346 of 554

6.3 6.4
Portage A venue
Frontage
Residential
Frontage
Portage Avenue is a designated focal point for
the plan area due to its adjacency to the historic
Cannery building, new park, and the planned
woonerf.

The Portage Avenue park frontage zone will be
designed as a vibrant, human-scaled pedestrian
environment. Active programming throughout
this area will enliven both the woonerf and
the adjacent public park. Businesses along
this frontage are ideal candidates for outdoor
dining spaces, creating a lively backdrop for park
activities.

Standards:

6.3.1 Gr ound Floor Entries
Entries shall be flush at sidewalk grade and shall
have a minimum of four (4) active doorways per
200 linear feet.

Guidelines:

6.3.2 B alconies and Terraces
The inclusion of balconies and terraces should
be encouraged along the streetwall above
the ground floor in the park frontage zone to
take advantage of views of the public park
and to allow greater programmatic and visual
connection between uses in the buildings and
the park.

6.3.2 R espect the Cannery
Development along Portage Avenue adjacent to
the Cannery should emulate the Cannery, taking
cues from the materiality and fenestration, and
roof datum.

The residential ground floor level is characterized
by the lower intensity of activity, generally
fronting onto streets that are quieter in character,
and serves to foster neighborhood connection.

Individual residential entries and stoops are an
effective way to activate the street and create
greater opportunities for social interaction. At
the same time, they should provide a sense of
privacy and comfortable social distance from the
sidewalk.

Standards:

The following standards are in accordance with
Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 18.24.020
(Contextual Design Criteria and Objective Design
Standards):

6.4.1 Gr ound Floor Entries
Entries must be raised above sidewalk grade
based on the setback condition from the
property line.

Ground floor residential units shall have entries
with direct, individual access onto a public right
of way, open space, or easement.

Guidelines:

6.4.2 Stoops
Residential units should provide a stoop to create
a social distance from the street; home office
units are not required to have stoops and may be
entered at grade.

The design of stoops should balance the need to
create privacy for the unit occupant and allow
visual connection with the street.

Areas between stoops should be planted and
can be an opportunity to integrate Green
Stormwater Infrastructure.

BUILDINGS
Figure 86 Ground floors treatments can emulate the
materiality, fenestration, and roof datum of historic
structures.

Figure 87 Ground floor residential stoops can provide privacy for residents and neighborhood beautification and
Green Stormwater Infrastructure.120 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 121 Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
160

Packet Pg. 347 of 554

Sustainable
Design
Palo Alto has long been a leader in sustainability,
making impressive progress towards reducing
its carbon impacts, greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions, and resource consumption. In October
2022, Palo Alto City Council passed an ambitious
carbon neutrality by 2030 goal, building on
the City’s existing goal of cutting emissions
80% below 1990 levels by 2030. The following
standards and guidelines are intended to support
the City’s larger climate action goals to ensure a
sustainable and resilient future.

Standards:

6.5.1 C alifornia Green Building (CALGREEN)
Standards Code
New development shall adhere to Chapter

16.14 California Green Building Standards Code.

As stated in the code, all newly constructed
residential buildings must meet CALGREEN Tier 2
requirements.

6.5.2 Bir d-Safe Glass Design
All new mixed-use development that has facades
exceeding 30 percent glazing shall utilize bird-
safe design strategies. Applicants shall choose
from the following materials list:

A. Fritted Glass - Ceramic dots or ‘frits’ can be
silk-screened, printed, or otherwise applied to
the glass surface. This design element, useful
primarily for new construction, can also improve
solar heat gain control and reduce glare.

B. Etched Glass – Glass etching on the surface of
the glass can be achieved through acidic, caustic,
or abrasive substances. The etched markers
should be on the outside surface.

C. Permanent Stencils or Frosting - Frosted
glass is created by acid etching or sandblasting
transparent glass. Frosted areas are translucent,
but different finishes are available with different
levels of light transmission. An entire surface can
be frosted, or frosted patterns can be applied.

D. Exterior Apparatus - Fixed exterior screens,
grilles, netting, louvers, fins or mullions can
effectively reduce visible reflections, provide
insulation from strike impact, reduce solar
heat gain, reduce glare and provide weather
protection.

E. UV Coated Glass – Some birds can see into
the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum of light, a range
largely invisible to humans. UV-reflective and/
or absorbing patterns (transparent to humans
but visible to birds) are frequently suggested as
a solution for many bird collision problems. This
approach is not appropriate for situations where
the glazing is back lit.

The City is in the process of developing the
Citywide bird-safe design standards. Once
adopted, the Citywide standards shall supersede
the standards outlined in 6.5.2.

Guidelines:

6.5.3 Minimiz e Heat Gain
Building facades should be designed to balance
solar access with the need to control heat gain.

This could include the following:
• Shade windows with architectural features
that add visual interest by creating textural
variations.
• Architectural elements that should be used on
south-facing facades.
• Fixed shading features, which are designed with
a range of projection and spacing dimensions
that minimize heat gain and composed with
visually pleasing rhythms to avoid monotonous
building facades.
• Perforated horizontal overhang
• Awnings that are well integrated with the overall
building façade, especially for retail on the
ground floor.
• Sliding and folding perforated panels/shutters
that double as privacy screens for outdoor
private spaces such as balconies and terraces
overlooking El Camino Real.
• Trellis, Vegetation on windows and green walls
allow for minimizing heat gain while additionally
bolstering the overall concept of ecological
design.
• Shrubs and tree shade wherever possible should
augment façade design to minimize heat gain.
• Use of low-solar-transmittance glazing to
reduce solar gain.
• Use window treatments to reduce solar gain.

BUILDINGS6.5
Project Goals
Sustainability and the
Environment
Protect and enhance the environment,
while addressing the principles of
sustainability.

Balance of
Community Interests
Balance community-wide objectives with
the interests of neighborhood residents
and minimize displacement of existing
residents.
• Reflective and Light-colored outer surfaces can
minimally address heat gain but should be
employed in combination with the other façade
and roof treatments.

6.5.4 Bir d-Safe Building Design
For all new mixed-used development, whenever
feasible, encourage implementing LEED
standards on bird collsion deterrance from
the U.S. Green Building Council to reduce bird
collision and mortality.
122 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 123
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
161

Packet Pg. 348 of 554

6.5.5 D aylighting and Natural Ventilation
Buildings should be designed to maximize the
use of daylighting for all inhabited interior spaces
to provide a high-quality indoor environment,
reduce overall energy consumption and
reduce exposure to artificial lighting which can
negatively impact human health.

Buildings that allow for natural ventilation reduce
energy consumption for heating and cooling and
provide a higher-quality indoor environment.

Projects should optimize building orientation
for thermal comfort, shading, daylighting, and
natural ventilation, including operable windows.

6.5.6 Roofs
Where building roofs are free of solar panels
or other sustainability infrastructure, they
should be designed to include systems such as
vegetated roof covers, plants, green stormwater
infrastructure, and roofing materials with high
albedo surfaces to reduce heat island effect and
slow rainwater runoff.

Building roofs should be designed to create
usable recreational spaces. Rooftop shading
structures mounted with solar panels can
maximize the effective use of roof area.

Pockets of green roof can help furnish these
recreational spaces, and resist heat gain while
also serving the concept of ecological design.

6.5.7 R enewable Energy
Buildings should provide “solar ready”
infrastructure such as solar panel standoffs,
conduit, and roof water spigots that minimize
the cost and effort of adding solar capacity later,
as per the California Green Building Standards
Code.

6.5.8 Visibility
New development should incorporate elements
like green roofs, shading devices or photovoltaic
panels into the fabric of the building to highlight
building’s energy saving features.

New development should include interpretive
signage explaining the sustainable building
features of the building to promote sustainability
and to educate visitors and occupants how their
behavior can make an impact on overall building
performance.

BUILDINGS6.5
Figure 88 Building roofs can be multi-purpose including providing additional outdoor space for residents.

Figure 89 Visible elements of sustainability can include design features such as celebrating secure bike parking.
124 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 125
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
162

Packet Pg. 349 of 554

7.1 De velopment Standards

7.2 R eview Process

7.3 Implemen tation Actions

7.4 F unding and Financing Strategy
Implementation
7 The implementation of the NVCAP will require input by the public, City departments, regional agencies, and
private property owners. The City will take the lead in coordinating areawide actions and establishing funding
mechanisms for public investment in programs and
capital projects. However, private investment through
the architecture, landscaping, and maintenance of
individual development projects will be a significant
determinant of the look and feel of the plan area.

This chapter outlines the process for development proposals, lists anticipated implementation actions, and identifies a range of potential funding mechanisms to unlock the NVCAP’s vision and goals into reality.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
163

Packet Pg. 350 of 554

7.1 Development Standards
The NVCAP establishes new
allowable land uses and
corresponding development
standards to implement the
vision of the Plan. In addition to
the development policies and
guidelines mentioned in the
earlier chapters of the Plan, other
core development standards have
been adopted and integrated
into the Zoning Code, PAMC Title
18, as part of the Plan adoption.

For all development criteria
and regulations not amended
or superseded by this Plan, the
provisions of other chapters in the
PAMC shall prevail.

The NVCAP is primarily focused on residential
development. While other types of uses are
allowed, they are intended to be supportive for
the residents and visitors to the neighborhood.

New non-residential uses may be limited in size;
where applicable the total area cannot be more
than 5,000 square feet on a lot.

Within the NVCAP, there are six zoning districts:

1. Single Family Residential District (NV-R1):

The NV-R1 single family residential district
aims to foster detached dwellings with open
spaces for privacy and outdoor activities.

Minimum site area requirements promote
diverse neighborhoods, quality design, and
accommodate accessory dwelling units.

2. Two Family Residential District (NV-R2):

The NV-R2 two-family residence district
permits a second dwelling unit under the
same ownership as the initial dwelling
unit in designated single-family areas,
while maintaining the area’s single family
character.

IMPLEMENTATION

3. Medium Density Multiple-Family
Residential District (NV-R3): The NV-R3
district enhances multi-family housing
neighborhoods, with development standards
to mitigate impacts on adjacent lower
density residential areas. Projects on larger
parcels enable onsite parking and open
space needs, like garden apartments or
cluster developments, with anticipated
density ranging from 16 to 30 dwelling units
per acre and a 1.5:1 Floor Area Ratio.

4. High Density Multiple-Family Residential
District (NV-R4): The NV-R4 district provides
high-density apartment living, primarily
along major transportation corridors near
mass transit and employment centers.

Density ranges anticipated from 61 to 100
dwelling units per acre, with a maximum
Floor Area Ratio of 3.0:1.

5. Mixed-Use Districts (NV-MXL, NV-MXM,
NV-MXH): Mixed-use districts encourage a
blend of residential, retail, entertainment,
office, service, and commercial spaces,
fostering a pedestrian-friendly environment.

The NVCAP includes three mixed-use
districts: NV-MXL for small-scale commercial
and limited residential; NV-MXM for a mix of
residential and limited commercial; and NV-
MXH for ground-floor retail, entertainment,
and commercial with residential above,
emphasizing a pedestrian-oriented
streetscape. Density in these districts varies,
with permitted dwelling units per acre
anticipated from three to 100 and Floor Area
Ratios ranging from 0.5:1 to 3.0:1.

6. Public Facilities District (NV-PF): The NV-PF
district accommodates governmental, public
utility, educational, and community service
or recreational facilities. In North Ventura, a
one-acre portion of the NV-PF district may
allow for a 100% affordable housing project.

For the specific land use and development
standards for NVCAP, refer to PAMC Chapter

18.29, North Ventura (NV) District.

7. 2
Review Process
All new external changes or
improvements in NVCAP must
go through a Coordinated
Development Permit process
as per PAMC Section 19.10.050.

No such permit will be issued,
and no building or structure can
be erected, expanded, altered
externally, placed, installed, or
relocated within an approved
coordinated area plan area unless
it is consistent with the Plan.

For any uses needing a conditional use permit
in NVCAP zone districts, they must follow the
standard Conditional Use Permit process outlined
in Title 18 of the Municipal Code.

In compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was
prepared for the NVCAP, supplementing the
2030 Comprehensive Plan EIR. When new
projects undergo discretionary review by the
City, the Supplemental EIR may be used for their
environmental analysis. If the project’s scope
extends beyond the NVCAP’s CEQA analysis,
further assessment may be necessary.

Figure 90 NVCAP Zoning Map
128 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 129
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
164

Packet Pg. 351 of 554

7. 3
Implementation
Actions
Plan policies in the preceding
chapters will be implemented
by developers, property owners,
and the City over the course
of the plan horizon, many
through development projects.

However, certain policies require
implementation that must be
initiated by City staff and/or
coordinated with other public
agencies.

Table 19 summarizes proactive steps needed to
implement the NVCAP, agencies responsible for
implementation, and the expected timeframe
for each action. Related policies and goals from
preceding chapters for each implementation
action are also referenced.

Following Plan Adoption actions are anticipated
to completed directly following the adoption of
the NVCAP.
• Ongoing actions are expected to be
implemented throughout the planning period.
• Short-term actions are actions that are
expected to be completed within 0 to 4 years
from plan adoption.
• Mid-term actions are anticipated to be
implemented within 5 to 9 years from plan
adoption.
• Long-term actions are expected to be
completed between 10 to 20 years from plan
adoption.

Table 19 Implementation Actions in the NVCAP
Implementation
Action Number Action Description City Department or Public Agency Responsible Timeframe
Land Use and Zoning
IM 1 Field questions, facilitate desired project design, and proactively reach out to property owners and local brokers to identify opportunities for investment and lot consolidation and to promote the vision of the Plan.

Planning Ongoing
Open Space
IM 2 Renaturalize Matadero Creek:

Take actions to implement a concept for Matadero creek that will fully naturalize (removal of concrete channel) between Park Boulevard and Lambert Avenue. The flood channel should be widened to a 100-foot riparian corridor, at maximum, to achieve maximum geomorphic form and ecological function.

Planning, Public Works,
Santa Clara Valley
Water District
Long-Term
IM 3 Public Park:

Take actions to acquire, plan and implement the vision for a public park adjacent to Matadero Creek.

Planning, Public Works Long-Term
Street Improvements
IM 4 Wayfinding Signs:

Explore a program to design and implement a wayfinding sign program as an effective tool to celebrate history and provide a clear and predictable navigation for residents, visitors and employees.

Planning, Public Works,
Office of Transportation
Ongoing
IM 5 Woonerf:

Explore and implement a concept for a woonerf that may either be a private or public/private partnership to implement a concept that integrates vehicular, pedestrian and traffic calming elements for the segment of Portage Avenue between Ash Street and Park Boulevard.

Planning, Public Works,
Office of Transportation
Ongoing
Historic Preservation
IM 6 Explore within the first year after adoption of the Plan, the initiation of California or National Register and/or local Inventory as appropriate/as determined by Council for the cannery and the Ash office building.

Planning Short-Term
Parking Management
IM 7 Evaluate as needed future parking strategies to maintain parking availability such as a parking benefit district, pricing options, time-of-day restrictions, Residential Parking Permits, and shared parking.

Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long-
Term
IM 8 If hourly pricing is used, then explore a strategy that creates targets such that 85% of the spaces are used at any time OR such that 15% of the parking supply is available at any time.

Office of Transportation Mid-Term to Long-
Term

IMPLEMENTATION
130 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 131
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
165

Packet Pg. 352 of 554

Implementation
Action Number Action Description City Department or Public Agency Responsible Timeframe
IM 9 Explore unbundling commercial parking or requiring private parking to be available to the public. Planning Mid-Term to Long- Term
IM 10 Explore a parking pricing or a parking benefit district that could help support on-demand transit, transportation demand management measures, active transportation investments, transit pass programs, etc.

Office of
Transportation,
Planning
Mid-Term to Long-
Term
Infrastructure Improvements
IM 11 Evaluate water main capacity that may need to be upgraded on a project-by-project basis. It is likely that the existing six-inch (6”) water mains are not able to provide sufficient flow and pressure to meet required fire demands for new construction. Depending on the development project, water mains may need to be replaced and upsized to meet fire flow requirements.

Public Works Ongoing
IM 12 Paving:

Explore including into the Capital Improvement Program designs and implementation at key intersections and raised crossings.

Public Works Short-term to
long-term
Public Art
IM 13 Evaluate the placement of public art in relation to the Public Art Master Plan for the NVCAP. Community Services Ongoing IM 14 Explore updating the Public Art Master Plan as necessary to reconcile the vision of the NVCAP. Community Services Mid-Term to Long- Term
Mobility
IM 15 Publicly accessible shared path on private property: Implement locations indicated within NVCAP by requiring recorded easements over private property when property redevelops.

Public Works, Planning Ongoing

7. 2

IMPLEMENTATION
132 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 133
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
166

Packet Pg. 353 of 554

7. 4
Funding and
Financing Strategy
The NVCAP specifies new public infrastructure and amenities required to support the emergence of a walkable, transit-oriented, mixed- use neighborhood. The funding and financing strategy identifies the primary categories of capital improvement projects included in the NVCAP, and describes applicable funding and financing sources and mechanisms for constructing those projects.

Major Project Categories
The public infrastructure and amenity
improvements identified in the NVCAP fall into
five primary categories consisting of bicycle and
pedestrian infrastructure, streetscape, parks and
open space, green stormwater infrastructure, and
the re-naturalization of Matadero Creek.

Funding and Financing Sources and Mechanisms
A variety of potential funding sources and
financing mechanisms exist for implementing
the improvements identified in the NVCAP. This
section describes these sources and mechanisms
and their potential uses within the Plan Area. In
many cases, multiple funding sources will need to
be combined to pay for specific projects.

Although the terms “funding” and “financing”
are often used interchangeably, there is an
important distinction between the two terms.
“Funding” typically refers to a revenue source
such as a tax, fee, or grant that is used to pay
for an improvement. Some funding sources,
such as impact fees, are one-time payments,
while others, such as assessments, are ongoing
payments. “Financing” involves borrowing from
future revenues by issuing bonds or other debt
instruments that are paid back over time through
taxes or fee payments, enabling agencies to pay
for infrastructure before the revenue to cover the
full cost of the infrastructure is available.

Potential funding for improvements includes a
mix of developer contributions (both required
and negotiated, such as via the 340 Portage
development agreement), City resources, outside
grants, and district-based tools.

Funding Source
Category Examples
Developer
Contributions
Development
Standards
CEQA Mitigations
Impact / In-Lieu Fees
Negotiated
Agreements
City Resources General Fund
Capital Improvement
Plan
User Fees
Outside Grants Regional, State, and
Federal Grants
District-Based Tools Special Assessment
District
Community Facilities
District
Enhanced
Infrastructure Finance
District
Table 20 Funding Source Categories and Examples
Developer Contributions
Development Standards:

Each new development project will contribute
to the NVCAP’s implementation by meeting
requirements regulating each project’s land uses,
height, density, setbacks, parking requirements,
street frontage improvements, pedestrian access,
and other requirements specified in the NVCAP.

These standards are adopted in the City’s zoning
ordinance and must be satisfied for a project to
be granted approval.

Reimbursement Agreements:

If a developer is required to provide additional
infrastructure capacity or amenities to serve
the entire district, a reimbursement agreement
can be established to receive payments from
later developers who benefit from these early
improvements. This allows for areawide cost-
sharing.

CEQA Mitigations:

Developers may be required to contribute
to environmental mitigation measures, both
for areawide needs and for their specific
development projects.

Impact / In-Lieu Fees:

Impact fees are one-time fees imposed on new
developments to pay for improvements and
facilities that either serve the new development
or reduce the impacts of the project on the
existing community. Fee revenues cannot be used
to fund existing deficiencies in infrastructure.

The City of Palo Alto already has citywide
impact fees for Housing, Community and Public
Safety Facilities, Traffic, Parks, and Public Art.

All development projects within the Plan Area
must meet citywide impact and in-lieu fee
requirements.

Negotiated Agreements:

Community benefits are developer contributions
that exceed the baseline features required
under development standards, environmental
mitigation measures, and impact fees.

Community benefits agreements are negotiated
with developers individually in exchange for
additional development rights. A relevant
example for this is the development agreement
for the 340 Portage Avenue site. The developer
proposes to provide more than two acres of
land for a new public park surrounding Madero
Creek and one acre for affordable housing, in
addition to monetary contributions to both park
improvements and the city’s affordable housing
fund.

City Resources:

General Fund:

General Fund revenues include property tax,
sales tax, transient occupancy tax, and other
revenues that are primarily used to pay for
ongoing municipal services and operations.

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP):

Infrastructure projects identified in the NVCAP
are candidates for inclusion in the City’s
Capital Improvement Plan, which identifies a
range of specific funding sources for capital
improvement projects throughout the City of
Palo Alto. For example, sanitary sewer and
water main replacement projects and fiber optic
backbone extensions within the NVCAP area are
included in the Fiscal Year 2023 CIP, which plans
expenditures for 2023-2027.

User Fees:

User fees and rates include the fees charged
for the use of public infrastructure or goods. It
may be possible to use a portion of user fee or
rate revenue toward financing the costs of new
infrastructure, but user fees are unlikely to be a
major source of funding for implementation of
the NVCAP.

IMPLEMENTATION
134 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 135
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
167

Packet Pg. 354 of 554

Outside Grants
Various federal, state, and regional grant
programs distribute funding for public
improvements. Because grant programs are
typically competitive, grant funds are an
unpredictable funding source, and the City of
Palo Alto must remain vigilant in applying for
grants to implement the NVCAP. Unique grant
funding opportunities may become available
due to the area’s designation as a Priority
Development Area by the Association of Bay
Area Governments, and because most of the
Plan Area is within ½ mile of a Caltrain station—
enabling access to funds directed to transit-
oriented locations. However, access to grant
funds may be contingent on adopting land use
policies that comply with MTC’s Transit-Oriented
Communities policy, with particular impacts on
the Mobility Hubs and One Bay Area grants
describe below.

The following table describes outside grant
funding sources that may be applicable to public
capital improvements as of the passage of the
NVCAP; this is not an exhaustive list, however, and
new grant funding programs will open during the
implementation of the NVCAP.

7. 3
Table 21 Examples of Potential Regional or County Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements Program Adminstering
Agency Description
Eligible Capital Projects
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Access
Streetscape
Parks, Trails,
and Open
Space
Storm
Drainage
and Flood
Control
Regional or County
Mobility Hubs MTC The Mobility Hubs program funds projects in designated mobility hubs that connect services and infrastructure that promote the use of mobility options besides private vehicles. This includes connecting public transit, bike and pedestrian facilities, and bike or car share facilities.
x x x
Transportation for
Clean Air (TFCA)
Regional Program:

Bicycle Facilities
Grant Program
Bay Area
Air Quality
Management
District
(BAAQMD)
The TFCA program, administered by the BAAQMD, funds projects that reduce vehicle emissions. Sixty percent of funds collected go to the TFCA Regional Fund for competitive grants. Eligible projects must demonstrate air quality benefits and reduction of emissions from motor vehicles. One sub-program within the TFCA Regional Fund is the Bicycle Facilities Grant Program, which funds the construction of new bikeways and the installation of new bike parking facilities. x
Santa Clara
County Measure
B: Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Program
VTA Measure B was passed by Santa Clara County voters in 2016. Measure B authorized a 30-year, half-cent countywide sales tax to invest in transit, highway, and active transportation projects. Measure B includes nine different program areas, one of which is the Bicycle and Pedestrian Program (BPP). The BPP provides funding for bicycle and pedestrian capital projects and planning studies. Priority is given to projects that connect schools, transit and employment centers, and that fill gaps in existing bike/ped networks.
x
One Bay Area
Grant (round 3)
MTC OBAG 3 is MTC’s comprehensive policy and funding framework for distributing federal funding. OBAG 3 includes a Regional Program and a County Program. The county programs includes various competitive sub-programs. x x x
Transportation
Development Act
(TDA) Article 3
Program
MTC TDA funds are derived from a 1/4 cent of the State’s general sales tax. Article 3 of the TDA makes a portion of these funds available for use on bicycle and pedestrian projects. MTC programs TDA funds in the Bay Area.
x

IMPLEMENTATION
136 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 137
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
168

Packet Pg. 355 of 554

Program Adminstering Agency Description
Eligible Capital Projects
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and
Open Space
Storm Drainage
and Flood Control
State
Infill Infrastructure Grant California Department
of Housing and
Community
Development
The Infill Infrastructure Grant program provides fund for infrastructure improvements necessary to enable residential or mixed-use infill development.
x x x x
Transformative Climate
Communities
California Strategic
Growth Council
Proceeds from California’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund the Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) program. The TCC provides competitive grants for coordinated, community-led development and infrastructure projects focused on achieving multiple environmental, health, and economic benefits within a given community. Examples of eligible projects include affordable housing, transit, bicycle/pedestrian improvements, and urban green infrastructure. The TCC program prioritizes disadvantaged communities that have been most impacted by pollution, as measured by the CalEnviroScreen index. The TCC program offers Implementation Grants and Planning Grants.
x x x x
Affordable Housing and
Sustainable Communities
California Strategic
Growth Council
Proceeds from California’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund the AHSC program. AHSC is a competitive state grant program that promotes infill development and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through transportation and land use change. AHSC encourages combined investments in affordable housing, transit, and active transportation infrastructure, with a majority of funds typically awarded to the affordable housing component of a project.
x x x
Urban Greening Program California Natural
Resources Agency
Proceeds from the State’s Cap-and-Trade Program help fund California’s Urban Greening Program. The Urban Greening Program provides competitive funding for projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide other benefits related to reducing air/water pollution and the consumption of natural resources, and/or to increasing green spaces and green infrastructure. Eligible projects include the enhancement or expansion of neighborhood parks, green streets, urban trails, facilities that encourage active transportation, and other urban heat island mitigation measures. The program prioritizes projects that benefit disadvantaged communities, as determined by the CalEnviroScreen index. x x x x
Active Transportation
Program (ATP)
California
Transportation
Commission/MTC
ATP provides statewide competitive grants for pedestrian and bicycle capital projects. Certain trail projects are also eligible if they meet the requirements of the Recreational Trails Program (RTP), a sub-program within ATP.

Beyond the statewide competitive grants, ATP funds are also distributed to MPOs. A minimum of 25% of ATP funds must be allocated to disadvantaged communities.
x x x
Urban Streams
Restoration Program
(USRP)
California Department
of Water Resources
The USRP funds projects and provides technical assistance to restore urban streams to a more natural state.

Funds used for planning only must be used for projects that will serve disadvantaged communities once completed. Matching funds of 20 percent must be provided unless the grant will benefit a disadvantaged community. Examples of eligible projects include installation of green infrastructure such as bioswales, removing culverts or storm drains, and flood protection enhancements. x
Land and Water
Conservation Fund
California Department
of Parks and Recreation
The LWCF is a competitive grant program focused on creating new outdoor recreation opportunities for Californians. The program funds the acquisition or the development of recreational space. Eligible projects include the acquisition of land to create a new park, a buffer for an existing park, or a recreational/active transportation trail corridor, or the development of recreational features (e.g. sports fields, dog parks, gardens, open space, etc.)
x

7. 3

IMPLEMENTATION
Table 22 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements 138 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 139
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
169

Packet Pg. 356 of 554

Program Adminstering Agency Description
Eligible Capital Projects
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and
Open Space
Storm Drainage
and Flood Control
State
Local Highway Safety
Improvement Program
(HSIP)
Caltrans HSIP is funded by federal aid as a core program and was codified under the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Job Act. HSIP seeks to achieve significant reductions in traffic fatalities and injuries on public roads. Funds are eligible for work on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail, so long as the investment is focused on improving user safety for and addresses a specific safety problem. Non-safety related capital improvements (e.g. landscaping, street beautification) cannot exceed 10 percent of project costs.

Caltrans requires that projects be consistent with California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan. x x
Senate Bill 1: Local
Partnership Program (LP)
California
Transportation
Commission
SB 1, which was signed into law in 2017, is a $54-billion legislative package to fix and enhance roads, freeways, bridges, and transit across California. Funds are split among numerous programs. SB 1 created the LP program to reward jurisdictions and transportation agencies that have passed sales tax measures, developer fees, or other imposed transportation fees. The LP program includes a formula allocation as well as a competitive component. Eligible projects include a wide variety of transportation improvements – roads, pedestrian/bicycle facilities, transit facilities, and other improvements to mitigate urban runoff from new transportation infrastructure. For the competitive grant program, funds can only be used for capital improvements.
x x x

7. 3
Program Adminstering Agency Description
Eligible Capital Projects
Bicycle and
Pedestrian Access Streetscape Parks, Trails, and
Open Space
Storm Drainage
and Flood Control
Federal
Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act
Federal Highway
Administration, Federal
Transit Administration,
Federal Railway
Administration, and
Federal Aviation
Administration
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act provides over $550 billion for the nation’s infrastructure.

Estimated apportionments are available for Fiscal Years 2022 - 2026. Funds are available for a wide array of infrastructure needs including those related to public transit, airports, ports, bridges, water systems, and more.

Most of the funds will be distributed through state agencies which will be accessible through a range of state grant programs, whereas other funds will be apportioned directly to urbanized areas, and additional funds will be available through federal grants processes. The State of California is estimated to be apportioned more than $35 billion over five fiscal years, and the San Jose urbanized area, which includes Palo Alto, is expected to be directly apportioned $536 million over this same time period. x x x

IMPLEMENTATION
Table 22 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements (continued) Table 23 Examples of Potential Federal Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP Improvements 140 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 141
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
170

Packet Pg. 357 of 554

7. 3
District-Based “Value Capture” Tools
Land-based financing tools are typically
associated with new real estate development
to generate benefit-based special assessment
revenues or property tax revenues to finance
improvements through bond repayment or
paying for improvements over time. District-
based tools provide a stable revenue stream
while ensuring that properties benefitting from
improvements also contribute to those public
investments. The table below describes the three
primary types of district-based funding and
financing tools. Note that assessment districts
and community facilities districts primarily
capture additional funding from private entities,
while the enhanced infrastructure financing
district reinvests growth in public property tax
revenues within the district. If a district-based tool
is utilized, the boundaries do not necessarily need
to align with the NVCAP Plan Area boundaries.

Funding Tools Description Uses Considerations
Special Assessment
Districts
Additional assessment against a range of
participants, depending on the type of district
and relative benefit received.

Examples include: Landscaping and Lighting
District, Community Benefit District, Business
Improvement District.

Most useful for funding ongoing
operations and maintenance.

Requires simple majority vote of paying stakeholders.

Increases costs and risk for paying stakeholders. Stakeholders need to perceive a clear benefit for themselves.

Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other taxes, fees, and community benefits.

Little financial risk to the City or public agencies; could lead to increased tax revenue based on private reinvestment.

Additional City staff time to administer districts could offset some gains.

Community Facilities
District (Mello-Roos)
Additional assessment on property, levied
and varied based on a selected property
characteristic (excluding property value).

Financing infrastructure
improvements, development of
public facilities; also, ongoing
operations and maintenance.

Requires approval of 2/3 of property owners (by land area) if there are fewer than 12 registered voters residing in the district.

Boundaries can include non-contiguous parcels.

Fees can be proportionally subdivided and passed on to future property / home owners.

Increases costs and risk for landowners and homeowners if fees dissuade buyers or reduce achievable sales prices.

Impacts paying stakeholders’ overall ability to support other taxes, fees, and community benefits.

Enhanced
Infrastructure
Financing District
(EIFD)
Diverts a portion of future municipal General
Fund property tax revenues generated within
the district to help fund infrastructure projects.

Climate resilience districts are a type of EIFD
specifically intended to fund climate projects
such as addressing sea level rise.

Financing infrastructure
improvements, development
of public facilities, affordable
housing development.

Formation and bond issuance does not require a local vote.

Does not cost individual property owners additional fees and taxes.

Does not divert revenues from schools.

Reduces future General Fund revenues by restricting use of the district’s future property tax revenue growth.

IMPLEMENTATION
Table 24 Summary of Major District-Based Value Capture Tools 142 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 143
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
171

Packet Pg. 358 of 554

7. 3
Infrastructure Improvements and
Applicable Funding Sources
The following table describes the applicability
of various funding sources to the improvement
needs identified in the NVCAP. Funding
availability for improvements within the Plan
Area will vary based on development activity,
economic conditions, and availability of grants.

Developer Contributions City Resources District Based Outside Sources
Development
Standards
CEQA Mitiga-
tion
Impact and In-
Lieu Fees
Negotiated
Agreements
General Fund Capital Im-
provement Plan
User Fees CFD EIFD Special Assess-
ment District
Grants (Fed-
eral, Regional,
State)
Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure, Streetscape Improvements Public Right of Way
Improvements

X X X X X X X X X
Intersection Improvements X X X X X X X X X
Parks and Open Space
Land Acquisition X X X X X X
Construction of New Parks or
Plazas

X X X X X X
Matadero Creek Re-Naturalization
Land Acquisition X X X X X X
Construction of New
Infrastructure

X X X X X X X
Utilities
District-wide: Stormwater,
Water, and Sewer
Improvements

X X X X X X X X
On-site/Project Specific:

Stormwater, Water, and Sewer
Improvements

X X X X

IMPLEMENTATION
Table 25 Infrastructure Improvements and Applicable Funding Sources in the NVCAP 144 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 145
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
172

Packet Pg. 359 of 554

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
173

Packet Pg. 360 of 554

North V entura
Coordinated Area Plan
Draft Plan: March 2024
June 2024 Mark-Up Version
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
174

Packet Pg. 361 of 554

North V entura
Coordinated Area Plan
Acknowledgments
City staff along Working Group members and consultants started working on the North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) in 2018. Thanks to all the Working Group members, City Council, boards and commission members, and members of the public who contributed their expertise, guidance, ideas, and feedback towards this Plan. Staff looks forward to working together on the implementation of this Plan.

NVCAP WORKING GROUP MEMBERS
Angela Dellaporta (Co Chair) Gail Price (Co Chair) Kirsten Flynn Terry Holzemer Heather Rosen Lund Smith
Yunan Song Tim Steele Siyi Zhang
Alexander Lew Keith Reckdahl Doria Summa
Waldemar Kaczmarski Lakiba Pittman

CORE TEAM
Jonathan Lait Director of Planning and Development Services Kelly Cha Senior Planner, Project Manager, Planning and Development Services Coleman Frick Principal Planner, Planning and Development Services Claire Raybould Principal Planner, Planning and Development Services Chitra Moitra Planner, Planning and Development Services Jessica Setiawan Senior Business Analyst, Planning and Development Services Rachael Tanner Assitant Director, Planning and Development Services (former) Clare Campbell Long-Range Planning Manager, Planning and Development Services (former) Elena Lee Project Manager, Planning and Development Services (former) Sheldon S. Ah Sing Project Manager, Planning and Development Services (former)

SPECIAL THANKS TO SPECIAL THANKS TO
The City’s North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan was made possible with funding provided by Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)’s Priority Development Area (PDA) Planning Grant and private funds from Sobrato Organization.

CONSULTANT AND CONTRIBUTORS
Perkins & Will, Primary Consultant
Arup, Mobility
Strategic Economics, Economic Study
BKF, Infrastructure
Plan to Place, Engagement
WRA, Environmental Consultants, Matadero Creek Study
Page & Turnbull, Historic Preservation Consultants
David J Powers and Associates, Environmental Consultants and Planners Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
175

Packet Pg. 362 of 554

Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
4CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 The Context

1.2 The Plan Area

1.3 The Project Goals

1.4 The Project Objectives

1.5 Citywide Planning

1.6 Regional and Statewide Planning

1.7 The Community Process
28 114
CHAPTER 2: THE VISION

2.1 Preferred Plan

2.2 Land Use

2.3 Ground Floor Edges

2.4 Mobility

2.5 Ecology and Sustainability

2.6 Urban Form
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM

3.1 Sidewalk Zone

3.4 Paving

3.5 Exterior Lighting

3.7 Public Art
56 126
68 CHAPTER 5: PARKS

5.1 Public Park

5.2 Matadero Creek
CHAPTER 6: BUILDINGS

6.1 Building Heights and Massing

6.2 Retail and Active Frontages

6.3 Portage Avenue Frontages

6.4 Residential Frontages

6.5 Sustainable Design
CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION

7.1 Development Standards

7.2 Review Process

7.4 Funding and Financing Strategy
CHAPTER 4: STREETS

4.1 Pedestrian Realm

4.2 Bike Network

4.4 Street Sections

4.5 Transit Access

4.6 Vehicle Circulation and Parking

4.7 Transportation Demand
Management

APPENDIX
A1 Existing Conditions Memo
104
v North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan vi
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
176

Packet Pg. 363 of 554

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Figures
Figure 1 Photograph of architect Mike Lyzwa hold-
ing a model of a proposed building at the
intersection of Page Mill Road and Park
Boulevard, circa 1984, xii. Credit: Palo Alto
Historical Association.

Figure 2 Photograph of the Cannery monitor roof
supergraphic on the former Fry’s site, 3.

Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 3 Bird’s eye photograph of the NVCAP
Plan Area circa 1957, 4. Credit: Palo Alto
Historical Association.

Figure 4 Priority Development Areas (PDA) in the
Bay Area, 7.

Figure 5 Matadero Creek Existing Conditions, 8.

Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 6 Former Cannery Building Existing
Conditions, 8. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 7 Existing Conditions of the NVCAP
Plan Area, 9.

Figure 8 Existing Zoning Districts of the NVCAP , 11.

Figure 9 Photographs of recent development,

12. Credit: Premier Properties, Level 10
Construction.

Figure 10 Conceptual Tentative Map for the 340
Portage Avenue Development
Figure 11 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter
Packing Company. Credit: Fairchild
Aerial Surveys, Flight C-7065, Frame 92,
Collection of UC Santa Barbara. Edited by
Page & Turnbull, 14.

Figure 12 Gabled addition attached to the
southernmost monitor roof of 340 Portage
Avenue. View northeast. Credit: Page &
Turnbull, 14.

Figure 13 A portion of the southwest facade of the
Turnbull, 15.

Figure 14 Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at
his canning plant in Alviso. Credit: Our
Town of Palo Alto, 15.

Figure 15 Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Credit: Palo Alto Historical Association, 15.

Figure 16 An illustrative example of low-cost buffered
bike lanes and intersection improvements,

17. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 17 Building 0 in San Francisco, CA, an
example of mixed-income multi-family
apartments next to a public park, 17. Credit:

Perkins&Will
Figure 18 A breakout discussion during the NVCAP
working group meeting, 19. Credit: City of
Palo Alto
Figure 19 Documenting feedback during a working
group design charrette, 19. Credit:

Perkins&Will
Figure 20 A worksession during the NVCAP working
group meeting, 24. Credit: City of Palo Alto
Figure 21 A sketching session and report back during
the NVCAP working group meeting, 26.

Credit: City of Palo Alto
Figure 22 A presentation during a community
workshop, 27. Credit: Perkins&Will
CHAPTER 2: THE VISION
Figure 23 The NVCAP Preferred Plan, 30.

Figure 24 NVCAP Land Use Framework, 32.

Figure 25 Example of High-Density Mixed Use
Development in Palo Alto, 34 Credit:

Steinberg Architects
Figure 26 Example of Medium Density Mixed Use
Development in Palo Alto, 34. Credit: BDE
Architecture
Figure 27 Example of Low-Density Mixed Use
Development, 35 Credit: WHA
Figure 28 Example of High-Density Residential
Figure 29 Example of Medium Density Residential
Development in Palo Alto, 35. Credit:

Compass
Figure 30 Example of Low-Density Resident
Development, 35 Credit: Google
Figure 31 The Cloudera Galactic HQ is located at 395
Page Mill Road, 36. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 32 NVCAP Ground Floor Edges Framework, 38.

Figure 33 Building lobbies and other accessory
spaces to residential uses are considered
active uses, 40. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 34 Neighborhood-serving retail along major
boulevards like El Camino Real, 41. Credit:

Bruce Damonte
Figure 35 Residential stoops should be set back and
elevated to provide privacy for residents,

41. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 36 NVCAP Mobility Framework, 42.

Figure 37 NVCAP Pedestrian Network, 44.

Figure 38 View of the Bell Street Woonerf in Seattle,
Washington, 45. Credit: Puget Sound
Business Journal
Figure 39 Bike Facility Degree of Separation, 46.

Figure 40 NVCAP Bike Network Framework, 47.

Figure 41 NVCAP Vehicle and Parking Framework, 49.

Figure 42 NVCAP Ecology and Sustainability
Framework, 50.

Figure 43 A conceptual design for the future Public
park, 52.

Figure 44 An example of a restored creek in San Luis
Obispo, CA, 53. Credit: Food and Wine
Safari
Figure 45 An example of green infrastructure
integrated with street furnishings, 53.

Credit: AJ Landskap
Figure 46 NVCAP Urban Form Framework , 54.

Figure 47 Internal streets have height allowances
that are conducive with missing middle
housing like townhomes, 56.

Credit: Perkins&Will
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM
Figure 48 The Sidewalk Zone, 58.

Figure 49 Bioretention, 61. Credit: City of Palo Alto
helps mitigate light pollution and the
health of both humans and wildlife, 62.

Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare.
helps mitigate light pollution and the
health of both humans and wildlife, 63.

Credit: Edgar Zacarias via Foursquare.

Figure 52 Neighborhood map and directional
visitors to the NVCAP, 64.

Figure 53 An example of a recent public art installa-
tion, 65. Credit: Passages by Susan Zocco-
la.
vii North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan viii
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
177

Packet Pg. 364 of 554

CHAPTER 4: STREETS
Figures
CHAPTER 5: PARKS
CHAPTER 6: BUILDINGS
CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION
Figure 54 Map of Conceptual Gateway Intersection
Design Improvements, 72.

Figure 55 El Camino Real and Page Mill Road Con-
ceptual Intersection Design, 73.

Figure 56 El Camino Real and Olive Avenue Concep-
tual Intersection Design,74.

Figure 57 El Camino Real, Hansen Way, Portage Ave-
nue Conceptual Intersection Design, 75.

Figure 58 Lambert Avenue and Ash Street Conceptu-
al Intersection Design, 76.

Figure 59 Park Boulevard and Portage Avenue Con-
ceptual Intersection Design, 77.

Figure 60 Typical Park Boulevard Section, 81.

Figure 61 Typical Olive Avenue section between Park
Boulevard and Ash Street, 83.

Figure 62 Typical Olive Avenue section between Ash
Street and El Camino Real, 83.

Figure 63 Typical Ash Street section between Page
Mill Road and Olive Avenue, 85.

Figure 64 Typical Ash Street section between Acacia
Avenue and Lambert Avenue, 85.

Figure 65 Typical Acacia Avenue Section, 87.

Figure 66 Typical Pepper Avenue Section, 89.

Figure 67 Typical Portage Avenue section between
Park Boulevard and Ash Street, 91.

Figure 68 Typical Portage Avenue section between
Ash Street and El Camino Real, 91,
Figure 69 Streetscape elements like double row
of trees, textured pavement, pedestrian
scale lighting , and seating encourages
a low-carbon, welcoming neighborhood
environment, 93. Credit: SWA
Figure 70 Typical Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone
Section, 94.

Figure 71 Typical El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone
Section, 95.

Figure 72 Typical Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone
Section, 96.

Figure 73 Typical mid-block connetion section, 99.

Figure 74 Typical rear setback connection section, 99.

Figure 75 Location of Park Gateways and Circulation
Paths, 107.

Figure 76 An example of passive park programming,
109. Credit: Jennifer Tyner
Figure 77 An example of active park programming,
109. Credit: Daggett
Figure 78 The location of the Matadero Creek buffer,
circulation, and gateways, 111.

Figure 79 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a
constrained concrete trapezoidal channel.,
112. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 80 A naturalized creek has the opportunity to
provide multi-use trails and habitat areas,
113. Credit: Food and Wine Safari
Figure 81 An example of a daylight plane
requirement for mixed-use development
stepping down to single family residential
neighborhoods, 116.

Figure 82 Allowable Height Map, 117.
signage, 118. Credit: David Baker Architects
outdoor rooms to allow for lively spillover
of retail, 119 Credit: Bruce Damonte
transparency and a connection to the
street, 119 Credit: David Baker Architects
materiality, fenestration, and roof datum of
historic structures, 120. Credit: Connect CRA
privacy for residents, neighborhood
management, 121. Credit: Perkins&Will
Figure 88 Buidling roofs can be multi-purpose,
including providing additional outdoor
space for residents, 124. Credit: Kirstin
Bucher
Figure 89 Visible elements of sustainability can
include design features such as celebrating
secure bike parking, 125. Credit: Nelson /
Nygaard
Figure 90 NVCAP Zoning Map, as of March 2024, 129.
ix North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan x
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
178

Packet Pg. 365 of 554

T ables
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Table 1 Historical Population and Growth in Palo
Alto, 1980 - 2040, 7.

Table 2 Existing Zoning Designations, 10.

Table 3 Existing and Future Development Potential
by Land Use, 32.

Table 4 Proposed NVCAP Development Standards,

36. CHAPTER 2: THE VISION
CHAPTER 3: PUBLIC REALM
Table 6 Allowed Features by Sidewalk Zone, 58.

CHAPTER 4: STREETS
Table 7 Park Boulevard Street Design, 80.

Table 8 Olive Avenue Street Design, 82.

Table 9 Ash Street Street Design, 84.

Table 10 Acacia Avenue Street Design, 86.

Table 11 Pepper Avenue Street Design, 88.

Table 12 Portage Avenue Street Design, 90.

Table 13 Lambert Avenue Sidewalk Zone Design, 94.

Table 14 El Camino Real Sidewalk Zone Design, 95.

Table 15 Page Mill Road Sidewalk Zone Design, 96.

Table 16 Mid-Block Paseo Design, 98.

Table 17 Rear Setback Pathway Design, 98.

Table 18 TDM Strategy Menu, 104.

CHAPTER 7: IMPLEMENTATION
(Continued), 132.

Table 20 Funding Source Categories and Examples,
135.

Table 21 Examples of Potential Regional or County
Grant Funding Sources for NVCAP
Table 22 Examples of Potential State Grant Funding
Table 22 Examples of Potential State Grant
(Continued), 140.

Table 23 Examples of Potential Federal Grant
140.

Table 24 Summary of Major District-Based Value
Capture Tools, 142.

Applicable Funding Sources in the NVCAP ,
144.
xi North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan xii
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
179

Packet Pg. 366 of 554

The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
(NVCAP) represents a rare opportunity within
the City of Palo Alto to plan proactively for a
transit-oriented, mixed-use, mixed-income,
and walkable neighborhood. The NVCAP sets
forth a vision that:
• Honors the storied history and unique character of the North Ventura neighborhood;
• Understands the needs of current residents and puts forward near-term solutions to current challenges;
• Establishes a long-term framework for desired growth so that more people can call North Ventura home; and
• Invests in community infrastructure to support an equitable, resilient, and sustainable Palo Alto.

Executive Summary
NVCAP is aligned with the goals and policies embedded in the adopted City of Palo Alto 2030 Comprehensive Plan, addressing the eight major themes: Building Community and Neighborhoods; Maintaining and Enhancing Community Character; Reducing Reliance on the Automobile; Meeting Housing Supply Challenges; Protecting and Sustaining the Natural Environment; Keeping Palo Alto Prepared for Future Natural and Human-Caused Hazards; Meeting Residential and Commercial Needs; and Providing Responsive Governance and Regional Leadership.

Finally, this is a vision shaped by the Palo Alto community. This Plan would not be possible without the guidance of stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and other community members, who graciously volunteered their time as members of the Working Group to thoughtfully consider the challenges and opportunities of the Plan.

Figure 1 Photograph of architect Mike Lyzwa holding a model of a proposed building at the intersection of Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard, circa 1984.
xiii North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 1
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
180

Packet Pg. 367 of 554

Plan Organization
The plan document is organized
as follows:

Introduction provides an overview of the NVCAP
physical and regulatory context. The Plan is
shaped by the project goals and objectives,
adopted and in-progress City plans and policies,
recently enacted regional and state laws, and the
comprehensive community planning process.

The Vision provides an overview of the vision
for the future of NVCAP built and natural
environment. This includes urban design
frameworks that calibrate the optimal mix of
uses; support a multi-modal mobility framework
within the neighborhood and how it connects
to the rest of the city and the region; foster
a regenerative and ecological framework to
support the health of humans and wildlife while
supporting the implementation of City’s Climate
Action Plan; and the neighborhood’s context-
Design Standards and Guidelines (Public
Realm, Streets, Parks, Buildings) include
requirements that govern the construction
whereas guidelines are qualitative requirements.

Implementation outlines the necessary steps to
and capital investments.

Appendix contains information for reference
used to generate the NVCAP including existing
site conditions, market studies, and infrastructure
analysis.

Figure 2 Photograph of the Cannery monitor roof supergraphic on the former Fry’s site, 2022 Credit: Perkins&Will
2 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 3
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
181

Packet Pg. 368 of 554

1.1 Context

1.2 Plan Area

1.3 Project Goals

1.4 Project Objectives

1.5 Citywide Planning

1.6 Regional and Statewide Planning

1.7 Community Process
Introduction
1 Figure 3 Bird’s eye photograph of the NVCAP Plan
Area circa 1957.

Matadero Creek Sutter Packing Plant
Park Boulevard
El Camino Real
Stanford Industrial Park
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
182

Packet Pg. 369 of 554

1 .1
Context
The purpose of the NVCAP is to capture the City’s vision for the North Ventura neighborhood into a regulatory document that will guide the future development of the 60-acre plan area, including land use, development standards, and design guidelines.

This planning effort was initiated by Palo Alto
Initiated by the City Council to implement
Comprehensive Plan Program L-4.10, which states
the following,
Prepare a Coordinated Area Plan
for the North Ventura area and
surrounding California Avenue area.

The Plan should describe a vision for
the future of the North Ventura area as
a walkable neighborhood with multi-
public park, creek improvements, and
an interconnected street grid. It should
guide the development of the California
Avenue area as a well-designed mixed-
use district with diverse land uses and a
network of pedestrian-oriented streets.

The NVCAP aligns with the Comprehensive Plan
policy, however, the Plan Area focuses solely on
the North Ventura neighborhood.

On November 6, 2017, the City Council adopted
application to the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission for a Priority Development Area
Grant for the North Ventura Coordinated Area
Plan. The Council expressed local support and
commitment of necessary matching funds and
assurance of the completion of the project.

City Policies
The Region
The Bay Area is expected to be home to an
additional 1.4 million households by 2050. It
is essential that housing, transportation, and
other types of land uses work together – as
part of a regional growth framework – create
an equitable, prosperous future for all Bay Area
communities and make the best use of available
resources. Priority Development Areas (PDA) are
a key piece of the Bay Area’s regional growth
framework.

Approximately 70% of the Plan Area is located
within the California Avenue PDA, which was
selected as a PDA based on excellent access to
transit, the proximity of the existing California
Avenue Business District, and the availability of
underutilized parcels of land.

Figure 4 Priority Development Areas (PDA)
in the Bay Area
Palo Alto Growth Projections
According to the City’s Housing Element Update,
the total population is projected to grow to
82,835 people by 2030 and 86,510 people by
2040.

Historically, the number of new homes built in
the Bay Area has not kept pace with demand,
resulting in longer commutes, increasing prices,
and exacerbating issues of displacement and
homelessness. The number of new homes in Palo
Alto increased 3.8 percent from 2010 to 2020,
which is below the growth rate for Santa Clara
County and below the growth rate of the region’s
housing stock during this time period. At the
same time, Palo Alto’s population increased 6
percent.

Table 1 Historical Population and Growth
in Palo Alto, 1980 - 2040
Sources: U.S. Census 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, California Department of Finance 2021 and ABAG Plan Bay Area 2040 Projections
* Projections
Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.7: Use
coordinated area plan to guide
development
Comprehensive Plan (Program
L-4.10.1): Prepare a coordinated area
plan for the North Ventura area and
surrounding California Avenue area.

On November 6, 2017, the City Council
adopted a Resolution expressing
local support and commitment for the
preparation of the NVCAP .

Year Population Numerical
Change
Percent
Change
1980 55,225 741 1%
1990 55,900 675 1%
2000 58,598 2,698 5%
2010 64,403 5,805 10%
2020 68,145 3,254 6%
2030* 82,835* 15,178* 22%*
2040* 86,510* 3,675* 4%*
California Avenue PDA
6 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 7
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
183

Packet Pg. 370 of 554

For more information and history of the Palo
Alto Cannery, go to:

The Palo Alto Cannery Spotlight, Pages 14-15
Cloudera Galactic HQ
The Cannery
Matadero Creek Channel
California Avenue Caltrain Station
Boulware Park
Park Plaza Apartments
Navan
Plan Area
The NVCAP plan area is approximately 60 acres, roughly bounded by Oregon Expressway / Page Mill Road to the north, El Camino Real to the west, Lambert Avenue to the south, and the Caltrain rail corridor to the east. Nearby neighborhoods include the Evergreen neighborhood to the west, the Midtown neighborhood to the north, and Barron Park to the south.

Figure 7 Existing Conditions of the NVCAP Plan Area, 2020 1 . 2
Proximity to City Destinations
The plan area is within walking and biking
distance to several key destinations, including:
• The California Avenue Caltrain Station, which
is within a half mile of the plan area. Walking
access to the station is primarily along Park
Boulevard, a designated Bike Boulevard.
• El Camino Real, a regional commercial and
retail corridor. Opportunities for pedestrians
and bicyclists to cross Page Mill Road safely are
limited.
• California Avenue, a regional retail attraction
and social destination for the peninsula.
• Stanford University, one of the premier higher-
education institutions in the world.
• Stanford Research Park and California Avenue
Business District, accounting for almost 40% of
the City’s employment distribution.
• Signature Palo Alto open spaces such as Sarah
Wallis Park, Boulware Park, and J. Bowden Park.

Plan Area Notable Sites
Notable sites within the plan area include the
Matadero Creek Channel and the buildings
associated with the Cannery.

The portion of the Matadero Creek running
through the plan area is contained with a concrete
trapezoidal channel, which was built in 1990 from
El Camino Real to the Caltrain Tracks.

Figure 5 The Matadero Creek Channel is currently a
constrained concrete trapezoidal channel.

Figure 6 The former Cannery building site is 12.5
acres and located at the heart of the
NVCAP.

INTRODUCTION
Project Boundary
Caltrain Station
Bus Stops
Existing Sidewalks
Major External Connections
Surface Parking
Parks
8 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 9
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
184

Packet Pg. 371 of 554

Figure 8 Existing Zoning Districts of the NVCAP
ROLM
GM
GM
GM
CS
CS
CS
CS
R-1
R-1
RM-30
RM-30
RM-30
PC
Land Use and Zoning
The North Ventura neighborhood is already
made up of a mix of multi-family and single-
uses. Service commercial uses are concentrated
along El Camino Real, Lambert Avenue, and
the southern segment of Portage Avenue.
along Page Mill Road and Park Boulevard,
the most notable anchors being the Cloudera
Galactic Headquarters at 395 Page Mill Road
and the newly constructed building at 3045 Park
Boulevard.

About 70% of residential units in North Ventura
are single-family detached homes, most built
before 1950. Single-family homes occupy about
10 percent of the Plan Area and are generally
found along Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue.

The Park Plaza Apartments is the most notable
multi-family residential development within
the Plan Area, situated at the corner of Park
Boulevard and Page Mill Road.
1 . 2
Table 2 Existing Zoning Designations
Zoning Map
Designation District Name
R-1 Single-family residence district
RM-30 Medium density multiple-family residence district CS Service commercial district
ROLM
GM General manufacturing district
CN Neighborhood commercial district
PC Planned community district

INTRODUCTION
10 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 11
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
185

Packet Pg. 372 of 554

Recent Development
and new investment in mixed-use development.

A few new developments include:

Under Construction or Completed
441 Page Mill Road: a three-story mixed use
building with one level of underground parking.
3045 Park Boulevard: a two-story shell
commercial building with underground parking.
3225 El Camino Real: a mixed-use development
second building is two stories with ground
development includes underground and podium
parking.

The 340 Portage Avenue
Development Agreement
In October 2023, the City approved a
development agreement with the Sobrato
Organization, LLC for the redevelopment of the

14.65-acre site at 200-404 Portage Avenue,
3040-3250 Park Boulevard, 3201-3225 Ash Street
and 278 Lambert Avenue (Ordinance #5595).
parcels, is located centrally within the boundary
of the NVCAP. The development agreement
includes:
• Partial demolition of a commercial building
(formerly Bayside Cannery) deemed eligible for
the California Register of Historical Resources
building (340-404 Portage) to retain and restore
key historic features (Parcel 1)
• Construction of (74) new three-story townhome
condominiums replacing approximately 84,000
square feet (sf) of the historic cannery building
at 200-404 Portage Avenue (Parcel 1)
• Demolition of a building containing commercial
recreation use at 3040 Park Boulevard (Parcel 1)
• Dedication of approximately 3.25 acres
of land to the City for future affordable
housing (approximately 1 acre) and parkland
(approximately 2.25 acres) uses (Parcel 2)
1 . 2
Figure 9 Photographs of recent development
• Retention of existing research and development
(R&D) uses in the remaining portion of the
former cannery building (Parcel 3)
• Construction of a two-level parking garage
(Parcel 3)
•
3201-3225 Ash Street (Parcel 4)
• Conversion of automotive use at 3250 Park
Boulevard to R&D use (Parcel 5)
• Contribution of $5 million for future park
improvements and contributions to the City’s
affordable housing fund.
• Development of a Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) program for the R&D and
When the terms of the agreement end,
conformance with the NVCAP will be required of
all new projects in the affected area.

Figure 10 Conceptual Tentative Map for the 340 Portage Avenue Development 12 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 13
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
186

Packet Pg. 373 of 554

Spotlight:

Palo Alto Cannery
The southeast corner of the parcel
contains a one-story wood frame
building. The building, located on
Ash Street next the former cannery
building appears to have been initially
built as a dormitory for the cannery
employees sometime between 1918
and 1925 and was moved to its current
location in 1940. The building features
a front-gabled roof, wraparound porch
with a shed roof, and wood lap siding.

Figure 11 1941 aerial photograph of the Sutter Packing
Company. Source: Fairchild Aerial Surveys, Flight
C-7065, Frame 92, Collection of UC Santa Barbara.

Edited by Page & Turnbull.

Figure 12 Gabled addition attached to the southernmost
monitor roof of 340 Portage Avenue. View
northeast. Source: Page & Turnbull
The former cannery site was initially
developed in April 1918, by Thomas
Foon Chew, the owner of Bayside
Canning Company or affectionately
known in the press at the time as “The
Asparagus King”. This was intended
to be Mr. Chew’s second cannery; the
California. The Palo Alto cannery
was strategically located alongside a
Railroad’s Los Gatos branch, which
facilitated shipments, and Matadero
Creek for a ready water supply.

The cannery was expanded over
the next several decades. The site
operated as the Bay Side Cannery and
then as the Sutter Packing Company in
1929. The cannery continued to grow
through World War II and was closed
in 1949.

Although the building has undergone
some exterior alterations throughout
the expansion, aerial photos show
that from 1965, the building continues
to have the same shape and general
form as now. Following the closure of
the cannery, the site has been occupied
by an anchor retailer Maximart and
Electronics, continued to occupy the
site until the end of 2019.

Figure 13 A portion of the southwest facade of the former Figure 14 Thomas Foon Chew with two foremen at his canning plant in Alviso. Source: Our Town of Palo Alto.

Figure 15 Sutter Packing Plant, 1940. Source: Palo Alto Historical Association
1 . 2

INTRODUCTION
Some of the most distinctive features
include the monitor roofs, capped with
composition shingles and clad with
corrugated metal, wood clerestory
ribbon windows and wire glass
skylights.

At the heart of the NVCAP is the 12.5-
acre 340 Portage Avenue property.

What appears to be one large
building on the parcel is composed
of approximately ten buildings that
were constructed at various times
between 1918 and 1949. The building
is surrounded by a narrow parking lot
to the north and a larger parking lot
to the south bounded by Matadero
Creek. The rectangular former cannery
building features walls that are
concrete, corrugated metal or wood
siding, with a variety of roof shapes.
14 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 15
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
187

Packet Pg. 374 of 554

Project Goals
On March 5th, 2018, the City Council approved the following goals to guide the NVCAP . A project goal refers to the desired outcome of a project. The following goals are high-level statements that provide an overall context for the aims and accomplishments of the project.

Housing and Land Use
Add to the City’s supply of multi-family housing,
including market rate, affordable, “missing
middle” and senior housing in a walkable, mixed-
use, transit-accessible neighborhood, with retail
and commercial services, open space, and
possibly arts and entertainment uses.

Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Connections
to transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities,
including connections to the Caltrain Station,
Park Boulevard, and El Camino Real.

Connected Street Grid
gaps and street connections to California Avenue,
the Caltrain Station, and El Camino Real where
appropriate.

Community Facilities and Infrastructure
Carefully align and integrate development of
new community facilities and infrastructure
with private development, recognizing both the
community’s needs and that such investments
can increase the cost of housing.

Balance of Community Interests
Balance community-wide objectives with the
interests of neighborhood residents and minimize
displacement of existing residents.

Urban Design, Design Guidelines, and
Neighborhood Fabric
Develop human-scale urban design strategies,
and design guidelines that strengthen
development will respect the scale and character
of the surrounding residential neighborhood.

Sustainability and the Environment
Protect and enhance the environment, while
addressing the principles of sustainability.
1 .3
Figure 16 (left) An illustrative example of low-cost buffered bike lanes and intersection improvements.

Figure 17 (top) Building 0 in San Francisco, CA, an example of mixed-income multi-family apartments next to a public park.

Throughout the document, applicable
project goals are included in insets.

INTRODUCTION
16 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 17
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
188

Packet Pg. 375 of 554

Project Objectives
On March 5th, 2018, the City Council approved the following objectives to guide the NVCAP . Project objectives describe the optimal process and set the goalposts for a successful plan. Project objectives are measurable and achievable.

Data-Driven Approach
Employ a data-driven approach that considers
community desires, market conditions and
development patterns, development capacity,
natural resources, need for community facilities
(e.g., schools), and other relevant data to inform
plan policies.

Comprehensive User-Friendly Document and
Implementation
Create a comprehensive but user-friendly
location and extent of land uses, planning
policies, development regulations, and design
guidelines to enable development and needed
infrastructure investments in the project area.

Guide and Strategy for Staff and Decision
Makers
Provide a guide and strategy for staff and
decision-makers to bridge the gap between the
goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
and individual development projects in order to
streamline future land use and transportation
decisions.

Meaningful Community Engagement
Enable a process with meaningful opportunities
timeline, and an outcome (the coordinated area
priorities.

Economic Feasibility
of marketplace factors and incentives and
public infrastructure investments and projected
Environmental
A plan that is protective of public health and a
process that complies with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act.
1 . 4
Figure 18 (left) A breakout discussion during the NVCAP working group meeting, Figure 19 (top) Documenting feedback during a working group design charrette

INTRODUCTION
18 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 19
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
189

Packet Pg. 376 of 554

Citywide Planning
The standards and guidelines in this document are informed and in conformance with the following foundational city plans and policies. 2030 Comprehensive Plan
The City adopted the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
in November 2017, which is the primary tool
for guiding preservation and development in
and provides a collective vision that guides
preservation, growth, and change. The Plan
Area is a part of the California Avenue Multi-
Neighborhood Center. A multi-neighborhood
districts that serves more than one neighborhood
with a diverse mix of uses, including retail, service,
staff to prepare a coordinated area plan for the
North Ventura area and surrounding California
Avenue area. The plan should describe a vision
for the future of the North Ventura area as
a walkable neighborhood with multi-family
improvements, and an interconnected street grid.

It should guide the development of the California
Avenue area as a well-designed mixed-use
district with diverse land uses and a network of
pedestrian-oriented streets.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan
The City adopted the Bicycle and Pedestrian
Transportation Plan in July 2012, which
strategically guides public and private
investments in non-motorized transportation
facilities and related programs. The plan
critical bicycle streets, including Portage Avenue
as an enhanced bikeway as part of the Bay to
Ridge Trail and Park Boulevard as a major north-
south Bicycle Boulevard.

Housing Element 2023-2031
The Housing Element update, one of the
State-mandated components of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan, represents the City of Palo
Alto’s sixth Housing Element and plans for the
years 2023 through 2031. In total, approximately
6,700 housing units are needed to accommodate
the 2023-2031 growth for all income groups as
part of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation
(RHNA) process. The Plan Area includes 15
opportunity sites that could help the City meet its
housing needs (unit yield of approximately 300).

Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 19.10:

Coordinated Area Plans
This chapter establishes the procedures for the
preparation of coordinated area plans (CAP).

The chapter’s sections outline the purpose of a
CAP, the procedures needed to be performed
throughout the planning process, the contents
of the plan document, and the requirements for
permitting and development once the CAP has
been adopted.

Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.32:

Affordable Housing Incentive Program
The affordable housing incentive program is
intended to promote the development of 100%
affordable rental housing projects located within
one-half mile of a major transit stop or one-
quarter mile of a high-quality transit corridor.

Due to the Plan Area’s proximity to transit
and everyday needs, the NVCAP is a strong
candidate to support the City’s goal of adding
more affordable housing units to support a wider
range of incomes.
1 . 5
Palo Alto Municipal Code, Chapter 18.24:

Contextual Design Criteria and Objective
Design Standards
To comply with California’s recently adopted
legislation (Senate Bill (SB) 35 and SB 330) to
address the housing shortage within the state,
Palo Alto adopted objective design standards
to review new multi-family and mixed-use
residential housing projects. The development
standards and design guidelines included in
the coordinated area plan are intended to
be complementary to the objective design
standards.

Parks, Trails, Natural Open Space, and
Recreation Master Plan
Adopted in September 2017, the Parks Master
Plan presents the vision for the future of Palo
Alto’s parks, trails, natural open space, and
Plan Area as an urban canopy target area,
emphasizing the need for new green streets
and parks. Additionally, Policy 1.B.10 states the
following, ‘develop a creek walk along Matadero
Creek that links parks and creates open
space and a habitat corridor’. Finally, the plan
designates Portage Avenue and Park Boulevard
as ‘Pollinator Pathways,’ which are intended
to provide connectivity for natural systems
through the integration of green stormwater
infrastructure. The future public park and the
renaturalization of the creek can serve as an
integral component of the City’s larger regional
habitat connection concept, connecting people
and wildlife from the foothills to the Baylands.

Urban Forest Master Plan
Adopted in February 2019, the Urban Forest
Master Plan establishes long-term management
goals and strategies to foster a sustainable
urban forest in Palo Alto. The urban forest
includes street trees, park trees, forested
parklands, and trees in many private ownership
settings. NVCAP is aligned with the master plan’s
goals and policies including:
• Goal 1: A well-developed contiguous, healthy,
and ecologically resilient citywide urban forest;
and
• Goal 2: Re-generated native woodland and
riparian landscapes as the key ecological
basis of the urban forest with a focus on native
species and habitat.

INTRODUCTION
Green Stormwater Infrastructure Plan
Completed in 2019, the Green Stormwater
Infrastructure (GSI) Plan provides a guidance
framework to integrate GSI measures into the
City’s urban landscape to properly manage and
treat stormwater at its source, decreasing water
quality impacts to local creeks, the Baylands,
and the San Francisco Bay. Integration of GSI
measures is critical for the Plan Area to address
the current lack of open spaces, and high
amount of imperviousness. Chapter 4 of the
Prioritization Criteria, that projects located within
one of the key development areas should receive
a higher priority than projects located outside
one of these areas.

Public Art Master Plan
Completed in November 2016, the mission of
Palo Alto’s people, diverse neighborhoods, the
innovative and global character of its businesses
and academic institutions, and the beauty of
its natural environment. Several of the plan’s
objectives are applicable to NVCAP including:
• Objective 1: Locate art in unexpected places,
such as alleys to provide an element of surprise
and whimsy to everyday life.
• Objective 2: Integrate impactful, permanently-
sited public art projects in business areas.
• Objective 3: Install public art in neighborhoods
for residents to enjoy on a daily basis.
• Objective 4: Use art to promote environmental
stewardship and sustainability. Create
partnerships with Environmental Services and
local regional agencies to integrate public art
into environmental projects.
• Objective 5: Commission artists or artist/design
areas of Palo Alto where development is taking
place.
20 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 21
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
190

Packet Pg. 377 of 554

Regional and Statewide
Planning
Approximately 70% of the Plan Area is located within the California Avenue PDA, which was selected based on excellent access to transit, the proximity of the existing California Avenue Business District, and the availability of underutilized parcels of land. Therefore, NVCAP is subject to both regional and state legislation, developed and adopted to ensure new development within PDAs are supporting compact, equitable transit-oriented communities.

Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Policy
Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s)
regional Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC)
policy update seeks to support the region’s transit
investments by creating communities around
transit stations and along transit corridors that
not only support transit ridership, but that are
places where Bay Area residents of all abilities,
and income levels, and racial and ethnic
backgrounds can live, work and access services,
such as education, childcare, and healthcare. The
TOC policies would apply to PDAs that are served
Avenue Station (Caltrain). PDAs that comply with
these TOC policies are eligible for grant funding
administered by the MTC. Jurisdictions adopting
these policies would be required to implement
the following:
• New Residential Development: a minimum
density of 50 units/net acre or higher and an
allowable maximum density of 75 units/net acre
or higher.
•
minimum density of 2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) or
higher and an allowable maximum density of 4
FAR or higher.
• Parking Management Requirements: no
minimum parking requirement allowed.

At the time of plan adoption, the City has not
adopted the TOC policy.

Assembly Bill 2097 (AB2097)
The California State Legislature passed, and the
Governor signed, Assembly Bill (AB) 2097 that
eliminates minimum parking requirements for all
uses/development, (except hotels) within a half-
mile of public transit. This bill affects all properties within the NVCAP. The new requirements went
into effect on January 1, 2023, ahead of the
adoption of the NVCAP.
1 . 5 1 .6

INTRODUCTION
Sustainability and Climate Action Plan
Adopted in June 2023, the Sustainability and
Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) is a comprehensive
document laying out the City’s strategy to
achieve ambitious carbon reduction goals,
while improving natural environment, adapting
to climate impacts, and increasing livability for
Palo Alto residents. The S/CAP establishes the
goals of reducing carbon emissions 80 percent
below 1990 levels by 2030 (the “80 x 30” goal)
and achieving carbon neutrality by 2030. Several
of the plan’s goals are applicable to NVCAP
including:
• Energy: Reduce GHG emissions from the direct
use of natural gas in Palo Alto’s building sector
by at least 60% below 1990 levels (116,400 MT
CO2e reduction)
• Mobility: Reduce total vehicle miles traveled
12% by 2030, compared to a 2019 baseline, by
reducing commute vehicle miles traveled 20%,
visitor vehicles miles traveled 10%, and resident
vehicle miles traveled 6%
• Mobility: Increase the mode share for active
transportation (walking, biking) and transit from
19% to 40% of local work trips by 2030
• Natural Environment: Restore and enhance
resilience and biodiversity of our natural
environment throughout the City
• Natural Environment: Increase tree canopy to
40% city-wide coverage by 2030
• Natural Environment: By 2030, achieve a
10% increase in land area that uses green
stormwater infrastructure to treat urban water
runoff, compared to a 2020 baseline
Relationship Between the
NVCAP and Other City Plans and
Ordinances
The NVCAP implements the City of Palo Alto
Comprehensive Plan and provides more detailed
consistent with those found in the Comprehensive
Plan but address the unique characteristics of
NVCAP.

To implement the NVCAP, Palo Alto made
changes to Title 18, Zoning, in the Palo Alto
Municipal Code (PAMC). This new code section
projects within the plan area. While many
of these are detailed in the plan itself, the
regulations in the NVCAP section of Title 18 take
change or replace zoning standards, the
established PAMC requirements apply. However,
standards of NVCAP and PAMC, NVCAP
standards will be followed.

Regulatory Compliance
The Plan was prepared in accordance with CEQA,
and any state applicable law. The NVCAP guides
all development within the Plan Area and will
require amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
to ensure consistency and to implement
the development regulations and land uses
established in this CAP. The CAP is adopted under
the authority of the City’s Zoning Ordinance,
which designates Coordinated Area Plans as
a tool to guide land use and development
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
22 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 23
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
191

Packet Pg. 378 of 554

The Community Process
The NVCAP was informed by a multi-year planning process, which prioritized a robust and authentic community process, and invited a diversity of voices from both city departmental agencies and community stakeholders to shape the future of the Plan Area. 2 The City of Palo Alto conducted:

Spotlight:

Community
Workshops
17 NVCAP Working
Group Meetings
2 Online Surveys
6 Stakeholder Group
Meetings
Meetings with
Decision-Makers
City Council
Historic Resources Board (HRB)
Parks and Recreation
Commission (PRC)
Planning and Transportation
Commission (PTC)
Architectural Review Board
(ARB)
1 .7
Figure 20 A worksession during the NVCAP working group meeting Over the course of the planning process, City staff
and consultants conducted extensive community
outreach, providing numerous opportunities
for public engagement and meaningful input.

Stakeholders, decision-makers, residents, and
other community members have volunteered
their time to thoughtfully consider the challenges
and opportunities afforded by this project and
contribute to the evolving plan ideas.

As part of the planning process, three draft
alternatives were developed for the NVCAP. The
draft alternatives take into account feedback
provided by: (1) the NVCAP Working Group, (2)
feedback from community members provided
at community workshops, (3) analyses and
information provided by the City’s consultant
team to City staff and leadership. City Council
deliberated and selected a preferred scenario.

This community process led to the development
of the draft plan including the vision and design
framework included in Chapter 2.

INTRODUCTION
24 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 25
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
192

Packet Pg. 379 of 554

The NVCAP Working Group
Consistent with PAMC 19.10.030 and to ensure
engagement, the City Council appointed a
14-member Working Group (WG). The WG was
made up of 14 individuals and two alternates.

The group’s composition represented a diversity
of interests and expertise, including homeowners
and renters, people of different ages and cultural
backgrounds. The WG included:
• Residents (renters and property owners) living
within the Plan Area boundaries or the greater
North Ventura neighborhood.
• Business owners and local employees working
or owning a business within the Plan Area
boundaries or nearby (mix of small and larger
businesses).
• Property owners (large and small properties).
• City residents with expertise in urban design,
housing development, environmental planning,
transportation, or land economics.
• Planning and Transportation Commission (PTC)
member.
• Architectural Review Board (ARB) member.
• Parks and Recreation Commission member.

Over the course of 17 meetings held from 2018 to
2020, the WG reviewed and provided feedback
on existing conditions, planning alternatives, and
other information related to the planning area.

The WG created a vision statement for the Plan
Area which is summarized below:
‘The Working Group envisions the Plan
Area to replicate a European square
with open plaza, colorful public art,
beautiful landscaping with green open
spaces and lots of public amenities such
as benches, trails, and bike paths. The
existing context, between three and six
stories, interconnected with pedestrian
and bicycle paths. The bustling plaza
should have lots of local-serving retail
uses such as cafes, small local markets,
and theaters, which encourage lively
provide diverse housing opportunities,
with minimum intrusion from automobile
City Department Partnerships
The planning process was informed by
representatives from the City of Palo Alto to
ensure the plan was aligned with foundational
city plans, projects, and programs. The
departments represented include Planning &
Development, Transportation, Public Works,
Utilities, and Community Services.

The Community Workshops
Two community workshops were held to share
ideas, respond to study results, and weigh in on
the vision and emerging policies of the plan. The
2019. The community feedback helped to frame
the basis of the proposed draft plans. The
City hosted the second community workshop
on February 27, 2020. The workshop solicited
input on the three draft plan alternatives and
endeavored to identify community priorities on
various topics.

Community Surveys
Staff prepared two online community surveys
(April 2020 and October 2020) to solicit input
from the members of the community. The surveys
aimed to reach community members unable to
attend the workshops. An online questionnaire
on the draft alternatives was created by staff
to solicit input from the community at-large in
October 2020. About 30 community members
responded. The majority of the participants
preferred Alternative 3, supporting higher
residential densities and heights, allowing small
on the proposed transportation improvements,
and parks and open space proposals. Opinions
varied over preservation of the cannery building.

Some preferred removal of old cannery building
while others supported partial retention.

Project Website
To augment the community engagement
efforts, the city hosted a robust project website
that served as the primary online portal for
community engagement. It included information
on project updates, upcoming events, updated
summaries of workshops and staff reports.

Public Noticing / Mailing List
Notices of all public hearings and WG meetings
were published in accordance with the
regulations set forth by the Palo Alto Municipal
Code and City regulations. Additionally, an
extensive emailing list consisting of over 430
interested community members was developed
and maintained by City staff and used for
disseminating information to all interested
individuals.

Stakeholder Group Meetings
Stakeholder groups including property owners,
commercial tenants, area residents, Palo Alto
advocates (affordable housing representatives,
bicycle groups, environmental representatives,
and their input was gathered through a series
of six meetings. Staff also presented to the
December 2018, on February 20, 2020, and on
Board Members indicated an interest to site a
new school to serve new families conceived in
the draft alternatives. The City is supportive of
working together to understand student yield
from proposed typologies and suitable sites.

During the development and public review of
alternatives, City staff have continued discussions
with stakeholders, such as property owners and
affordable housing advocates to gather their
feedback on evolving policy ideas and aspects of
the alternatives.

Decision Maker Meetings
Since the initiation of the NVCAP planning
work in October 2018, City staff have provided
several updates to the following boards: City
Council, Historic Resources Board (HRB), Parks
and Recreation Commission (PRC), Planning
and Transportation Commission (PTC), and the
Architectural Review Board (ARB).
1 .6
Figure 21 A sketch session and report back during the NVCAP working group meeting
Figure 22 A presentation during a community workshop

INTRODUCTION
26 North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan 27
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
193

Packet Pg. 380 of 554

Vision
2 2.1 Plan Concept

2.2 Land Use

2.3 Ground Floor Edges

2.4 Mobility

2.5 Ecology and Sustainability

2.6 Urban Form
The North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan sets forth
The vision frameworks described in the following pages illustrates the desired physical form delivered incrementally over time which:
• Honors the storied history and
unique character of the North
Ventura neighborhood;
• Understands the needs of
current residents and puts
forward near-term solutions to
current challenges;
• Establishes a long-term
framework for desired growth
so more people can call North
Ventura home; and
• Invests in community
infrastructure to support
an equitable, resilient, and
sustainable Palo Alto.

Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
194

Packet Pg. 381 of 554

2 .1
Plan Concept
The NVCAP Concept at Potential Full Build-out

GREEN STORMWATER

INFRASTRUCTURE

SEAMLESS CONNECTION

TO CALTRAIN

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE

FRIENDLY STREETS

ENHANCED

URBAN FOREST

ENERGY EFFICIENT

BUILDINGS

COMMUNITY

OPEN SPACE

CELEBRATING

HISTORY

NATURALIZED

MATADERO CREEK

ECOLOGICAL CORRIDORS

AND HABITAT

RESPECTING EXISTING

SINGLE FAMIL Y HOMES

INTERSECTIONS

BUILDINGS

AFFORDABLE

HOUSING OPTIONS
The actual development within the plan area will
vary based on each parcel’s project goals and
in Figure 23 does not incorporate development
projects recently approved or constructed.

North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
195

Packet Pg. 382 of 554

2 . 2
Land Use
NVCAP aims to achieve the following targets for
these land uses within the plan area:
• Allow up to 530 new dwelling units;
• Approximately 2 acres of public open space;
• 16,600 square feet of commercial development
including existing and new local retail and
professional services.

Existing and Future Development Potential by Land Use
Land Use Future
Residential
(units)
142 units 672 units
Parks (acres) 0 acres 1.9 acres
744,000 sq.ft. 466,000 sq.ft.

Retail (sq.ft.) 111,200 sq.ft. 103,700 sq.ft.

NVCAP Land Use Framework

THE VISION
North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
196

Packet Pg. 383 of 554

2 . 2
Residential
The NVCAP land use framework is principally
focused on supporting a variety of housing
options, a diverse range of unit sizes and
and price points to
support Palo Alto residents at different stages of
life. Residential density will depend on its location
within the Plan Area. For example, mixed use
midrise development will be encouraged along
commercial corridors whereas townhomes will
be encouraged adjacent to existing residential
development.

The land use designations listed below are
calibrated for a wide range of multi-family
housing typologies:

The high-density mixed-use designation is
located along the southern segment of El Camino
Real. The designation is intended to support
This designation requires active uses for ground
nodes along El Camino Real, to support its role as
a regional commercial corridor. The designation
requires that upper stories be residential. The medium-density mixed-use designation is located on the northern segment of El Camino
Real and Page Mill Road. The designation is
apartment buildings. This designation requires
Real, to support its role as a regional commercial
corridor. The designation requires that upper
stories be residential.

Project Goals
Housing and Land Use
Add to the City’s supply of multi-
family housing, including market rate,
affordable, “missing middle, ” and senior
housing in a walkable, mixed-use, transit-
accessible neighborhood, with retail and
commercial services, open space, and
possibly arts and entertainment uses.

Balance of Community
Interests
Balance community-wide objectives
with the interests of neighborhood
residents and minimize displacement of
existing residents.

The low-density mixed-use designation serves
as a transition between the high-density mixed-
use area and the low-density residential areas
located in the interior of the plan area. The
designation area is also located along Ash
Street and Portage Avenue, to support mid-
to-low-rise multi-family development near the
are encouraged but not required. Residential is
The high-density residential designation is
located on the large 395 Page Mill Road site and
is targed towards development on the surface
parking lots.

The medium-density residential designation
is located at the 340 Portage Avenue site to
support the long-term goal of supporting
additional housing in the plan area. The
designation requires that both the ground
designation is intended to support a mix of
townhouses and mid-rise apartments. Allowable
heights are calibrated to support sensitive
structures such as the Cannery building.

Example of High-Density
Mixed Use in Palo Alto
Example of Medium-Density
Mixed Use in Palo Alto
Example of Low-Density
Mixed Use in Palo Alto
Example of High Density
Residential in Palo Alto
Example of Medium Density
Residential in Palo Alto
The low-density residential designation is
calibrated to both facilitate new housing
development while also being sensitive to the
existing single-family neighborhood fabric -
located along Pepper Avenue and Olive Avenue.

This area of existing single-family homes has
been designated as an area of stability and will
Example of Low Density
Residential in Palo Alto
North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
197

Packet Pg. 384 of 554

2 . 2
The Cloudera Galactic HQ is
located at 395 Page Mill Road
FAR
High-Density Mixed Use 61-100 55*65 3.0:1 NV-MXH
Medium-Density Mixed-Use 31-70 45*55 2.0:1 NV-MXM
Low-Density Mixed Use 3-17 35*35 0.5:1 NV-MXL
High Density Residential 61-100 55*65 3.0:1 NV-R4
Medium Density Residential 16-30 35*45 1.5:1 NV-R3
Low Density Residential 1 or 2 units/lot 30 0.45:1 NV-R2 NV-R1
Public Facilities and Open Space n/a n/a n/a NV-PF
Proposed NVCAP Development Standards
To bolster the City’s affordable housing program,
new townhome ownership projects across the
plan area would provide 20% inclusionary below
market rate (BMR) units. For all other housing types,
both ownership and rental, a 15% inclusionary BMR
requirement would apply. In accordance with the
Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC), in-lieu fees may
be paid in certain circumstances.

Proposed 100% below-market-rate (BMR) projects
in the NVCAP are eligible for an additional height
bonus through either the State Density Bonus or the
City’s Housing Incentive Program.

This land use designation is located in the
southeastern corner of the plan area. This will
include the approximately 2 acre public open space
as well as the re-naturalization of the Matadero
Creek between Park Boulevard and Lambert
Avenue.
* 100% Affordable Housing is eligible for an additional 33 feet when using the applicable Housing Incentive Program development standards.

Existing land uses are permitted to remain in
place and continue operations. Existing buildings
or land uses which become nonconforming
as a result of the new zoning and land use
in the Zoning Code regarding nonconforming
buildings and uses. Certain limits are established
for repairs, additions, restoration, expansion, and
occupancy after an extended vacancy. See PAMC

18.70 (Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying
Facilities) for applicable requirements.

THE VISION
North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
198

Packet Pg. 385 of 554

2 .3
Ground Floor
Edges
NVCAP Ground Floor
Edges Framework
For design standards and guidelines, go to:

Chapter 5: Site and Building Design

REQUIRED

RETAIL EDGE

REQUIRED

RETAIL EDGE
North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan
Item 9
Attachment G - Final Draft NVCAP

Item 9: Staff Report
Pg.
199

Packet Pg. 386 of 554

2 .3
To create a pedestrian-friendly environment and
new development within within designated areas
of high-density and medium-density mixed-use
designations will provide active uses on frontages
facing a public right-of-way, greenway, or park,
to the degree feasible. Retail or retail-like uses are
Real and encouraged along Park Boulevard.
select nodes along prominent corridors, NVCAP
is supporting the ability for residents to walk to
everyday services and subsequently reduce the
number of cars on the road. See Figure 32 on

Page 38 ends
← All documents from this meeting