Cities Index.
Item 12 Applicant Presentation

Palo Alto City Council
April 14, 2025

Document
Item 12 Applicant Presentation
Meeting
April 14, 2025
Body
Palo Alto City Council
Original file
25.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofpaloalto.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

70 ENCINA AVENUECITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION4.14.2025

ENCINA AVENUE TOWNHOMES

SITE CONTEXT – AERIAL PHOTO

PROJECT SITE
20 CONDO UNITS (MIX OF 2BR+ & 3BR) 20% AFFORDABLEORIGINAL CONCEPT – Sept 12, 2022 PHZ PRE-SCREENING COMMENTS FROM 9.12.221.This is a great place for housing2.Work with Ellis Partners to resolve their concerns about impacts to T&C.

ELLIS PARTNERS CONCERNS 9.12.20221.Five stories is out of context with T&C both in terms of height and density. Two or Three stories would be acceptable.2.Concerned about potential impacts to Town & Country of housing next door. Suggesting it would hurt the vitality of the shopping center, and take away from it’s existing character.

ORIGINAL CONCEPT DIAGRAM – FOUR STORIES OVER PODIUM
5 STORIES20 UNITS
PHZ PRE-SCREENING CONCEPT – 9.12.2022
STEPPED MASSING DIAGRAM – REDUCED UNIT COUNT
5 STORIES18 UNITS
REDUCED PROGRAM – TWO OR THREE STORIES OVER PODIUM
3 STORIES10 UNITS
REDUCED PROGRAM – TWO OR THREE STORIES OVER PODIUM
3 STORIES10 UNITS
$

NOT VIABLE

SOLUTION THAT RESOLVES ECONOMICS & T&C CONCERNS
3 STORY TOWNHOMES10 UNITS

CONCEPTUAL SITE & UNIT LAYOUT DIAGRAMGROUND LEVEL

COURTYARD
DESIGN PRECEDENTSHARED PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS COURTYARD: FULTON PLACE, SAN FRANCISCO

DESIGN PRECEDENTSHARED PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS COURTYARD: FULTON PLACE, SAN FRANCISCO

DESIGN PRECEDENTSHARED PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESS COURTYARD: FULTON PLACE, SAN FRANCISCO

PROPOSED PLAN – GROUND FLOOR

PROPOSED PLANS – SECOND & THIRD FLOORSLEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
PROPOSED DESIGN – SEEN FROM THE REAR ENTRY INTO T&C

VISIBILITY FROM TOWN & COUNTRY

12.7.2023

11.7.2024
DESIGN RESPONSES1.Rear unit rooflines changed to flat to reduce façade height facing T&C2.Added rear screens to soften façade & provide window privacy ARB COMMENTS1.Design not deferential or compatible enough with T&C TOWN & COUNTRY – CONTEXT DIAGRAM
PROPOSED DESIGN – VIEW FROM ENCINA AVE

PROPOSED DESIGN – NORTHEAST CORNER
PROPOSED DESIGN – SIDEYARDS FOR MAINTENANCE & FIRE ACCESS

PROPOSED DESIGN – SIDEYARDS FOR MAINTENANCE & FIRE ACCESS PROPOSED DESIGN – COURTYARD VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PROPOSED DESIGN – COURTYARD VIEW LOOKING NORTH
PROPOSED DESIGN – FRONT FAÇADE ON ENCINA AVENUE
RECENT CHANGES IN ELLIS PARTNERS CONCERNSAt the February 26, 2025 ARB hearing they expressed interest now in developing a larger and taller residential project in other portions of their rear parking lot. This indicates they are:1.No longer concerned about Five stories being out of context with T&C both in terms of height and density.2.No longer concerned about negative impacts of housing on Town & Country.

THANK YOU

← All documents from this meeting