Item 1 Public Comment — Palo Alto City Council, August 11, 2025

From: Serena Chen
To: Council, City
Cc: Mike Wang
Subject: Objection to 4256 El Camino Real Project – Legal and Community Concerns Date: Monday, August 11, 2025 11:24:30 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear City of Palo Alto,
We are writing to reiterate and formally document our strong opposition to the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real. This project raises serious legal, zoning, and community-impact concerns that were also reported in the Palo Alto Online article (August 5, 2025), City leans on once controversial zoning tool for new housing proposals.

Approving this project in its current form would set a dangerous precedent — effectively opening a backdoor for an unethical developer to bypass the City’s established planning rules, to the detriment of our community.

Key Legal and Zoning Compliance Concerns

1. Required Zoning Exemptions
The proposal seeks numerous deviations from standard zoning requirements, including:

Height increases far beyond the legal limit
Residential density greater than what is allowed by current zoning Waivers eliminating the requirement for on-site retail space Reductions in required parking and open space
Alterations to landscaping and other design standards

2. Housing Element Non-Compliance
The site, formerly the Su Hong restaurant, is not included in Palo Alto’s official Housing Element — the state-mandated plan that outlines where new housing can be legally built. As such, it can only be counted as a “buffer” site, not a planned housing location. Approving it would undermine the integrity of the City’s Housing Element and could open the door to further opportunistic developments outside the City’s stated strategy.

This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Community Impacts
Granting such broad exemptions would directly harm neighboring residents by encouraging over-scaled construction that threatens privacy, sunlight access, traffic safety, and neighborhood character. More importantly, it sends the message that developers can sidestep planning law with enough political leverage — eroding public trust in the City’s zoning process.

We urge the City to reject any attempt to use controversial rezoning tools or special exemptions to push this project forward. Doing so would reward unethical practices, weaken legal safeguards, and set a harmful precedent for future development across Palo Alto.

Sincerely,
Serena Chen, Mike Wang, Palo Alto Residents
From: Annette Glanckopf
To: Council, City
Subject: pre-screening for 4256 ECR
Date: Saturday, August 9, 2025 7:32:24 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.

Dear Mayor Lauing and Council Members,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real. The development was discussed at a PAN meeting, and I am sympathetic with the plight of the neighbors.

This is overdevelopment is the worst way. It is my understanding that the Redwoods property used to be a redwood nursery, thus the beautiful trees. When the Redwoods complex was built, it was carefully constructed around the redwoods to preserve them and to provide a peaceful environment. Now this is threatened.

The proposed boxy, out of scale, oversized building at 4256 El Camino Real will negatively impact the values all Palo Altans want to enjoy: privacy, daylight plane, sight lines, and adequate setbacks to allow for light and air and minimize congestion.

As you know, the development proposal is for a 6 story, 80 + foot high project next to the Redwoods complex. It is hard to believe that the setbacks, next to the neighbors, are only 6 feet with no daylight plane requirement. Just imagine living next to that a few feet away from your home. Furthermore it is my understanding that 4 HERITAGE redwoods would have to be removed for the development. These beautiful trees need to be preserved.

Please ensure that full residential protections be applied to the Redwoods - limit the height, daylight planes, and additional aspects of what can be built near them.

Please listen to neighbor's concerns and insist that the developer go back to the drawing board and adjust the proposal to something we can all be proud of.

Thank you.

Annette Glanckopf
Midtown
From: Pat Markevitch
To: Council, City
Subject: Proposed development on the former Su Hong site Date: Saturday, August 9, 2025 4:38:27 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.

Dear Mayor Lauing and Council Members:

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real. This development is an out of scale, oversized building which will negatively impact the lives of the residents who reside at the Palo Alto Redwoods due to lack of adequate parking (leading to spillover). It will block open sky views, overlook their homes and pool, and is out of scale with the surrounding neighborhood.

Thank your for your time.

Pat Markevitc
From: [email protected]
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino – Proposed Housing Project
Date: Saturday, August 9, 2025 1:14:35 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,
I am writing with a heartfelt plea regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real.

When I moved to this neighborhood in the spring of 2025, one of the greatest joys in choosing my home was being surrounded by the beautiful, mature trees that have stood here for decades. They are a source of daily peace and a constant reminder of the balance between city life and nature. My hope has been to spend many years here—growing older in this place, contributing to the community, building relationships with neighbors, and living each day close to these trees.

Losing even a part of this tree canopy would mean losing a piece of what makes our neighborhood whole. These trees are not replaceable in our lifetime; once gone, they are gone forever. Their shade, their role in cleaning our air, and the sense of belonging they create cannot be replicated by new plantings or design features.

I understand that Palo Alto needs housing, but I urge the City to protect what makes this place worth living in. Any development should be approached with the highest level of care to ensure these trees are preserved and the neighborhood’s character is not diminished.

Please, let us not trade away the living treasures that make Palo Alto special for short-term gains.

This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to you.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter.

Sincerely,
Sohyang Yoon
4240 El Camino Real A208, Palo Alto CA 94306
From: Mariia Vainer
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real - Proposed Housing Project - PA City Council Agenda Item for August 11 Meeting Date: Saturday, August 9, 2025 12:18:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear City Council,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding: 4256 El Camino Real - Proposed Housing Project. As a resident of Palo Alto Redwoods, I believe this matter could significantly affect our community in terms of safety, quality of life, and the environment.

Concern:

The proposed development will increase traffic congestion on El Camino, making it unsafe for pedestrians and cyclists.

The proposed development could potentially damage the Palo Alto Redwoods because of the very high building with parking on such a small perimeter.

I Urge the City Council To:

Conduct a thorough traffic and environmental impact study.

Ensure that the project design respects the privacy and character of existing neighborhoods.

Provide sufficient infrastructure and parking to accommodate new residents and minimize spillover.

Maintain open communication with residents and local organizations during all phases of planning and construction.

I believe addressing these concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and future residents. I appreciate your attention to this matter and encourage the City Council to take these points into careful consideration.

Thank you for your service and commitment to our community.

Sincerely,
This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Mariia Vainer
4250 El Camino Real, Apt A306, Palo Alto, CA, 94306
Cell phone: 510 -358-1072
From: Rebecca Sanders
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real - Proposed Development
Date: Saturday, August 9, 2025 8:41:18 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.

Dear Mayor Lauing and Council Members:

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real. The development was discussed at the recent PAN meeting and even though I don’t live in the Redwoods I am sympathetic with their plight. A boxy, out of scale, oversized fortress is being proposed which will negatively impact the values all Palo Altans want to enjoy: privacy, daylight plane, sight lines, and adequate setbacks to allow for light and air and minimize congestion.

I also understand that the parking will be three stories of mechanical lifts which as we know from other projects in Palo Alto can be notoriously unreliable.

Please listen to their concerns and insist that the developer adjust the proposal to something we can all be proud of.

Thank you.

Becky Sanders
Ventura Neighborhood
From: Nikolay Moroz
To: Council, City
Subject: Subject - 4256 El Camino - Proposed Housing Project - Agenda Item - August 11, 2025 Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 10:26:40 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,
I am writing as a deeply concerned resident of 4250 El Camino Real, to express my serious objections to the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real. This project, as currently designed, presents significant and unaddressed threats to our neighborhood's safety, livability, and character.
My primary concerns are not just speculative; they are based on the direct and foreseeable impacts on our immediate community:
Public Safety and Traffic Congestion: El Camino Real is already a heavily traveled thoroughfare. Adding a high-density development without robust traffic mitigation will create a dangerous environment for everyone, particularly for the pedestrians and cyclists who use this street daily. This is not just an inconvenience—it's a serious public safety hazard. Emergency Access: The proposed design appears to have woefully inadequate setbacks. This could critically impede emergency vehicles, including fire trucks and ambulances, from gaining necessary access. A delay of even a few minutes in a medical or fire emergency could have tragic consequences.
Erosion of Neighborhood Character and Privacy: The scale and density of this project are out of character with the surrounding residential buildings. It will directly and negatively impact the privacy and quality of life for current residents, including myself, by introducing excessive light, noise, and visual intrusion.
Infrastructure Strain: The plan lacks sufficient parking and infrastructure to support the new residents. This will inevitably force vehicles onto our neighboring streets, overwhelming an already strained parking situation and creating further congestion. I implore the City Council to take a responsible and proactive approach.

I urge you to:
Commission a comprehensive, independent traffic and environmental impact study to truly This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to you.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
understand this project's full consequences.

Mandate a redesign that ensures adequate emergency vehicle access and sufficient setbacks. Require the developer to provide robust infrastructure and parking to prevent negative spillover effects on existing residential areas.
Prioritize transparent and continuous communication with local residents like myself throughout the entire process.

While I support responsible growth and new housing in Palo Alto, it cannot come at the expense of our community's safety and well-being. Please ensure that this development is a benefit, not a burden, to our city.
Thank you for your time and consideration of these critical issues. Sincerely,
Nikolay Moroz
Apartment B318
4250 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306
From: [email protected]
To: Council, City
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Proposed 6 Story, 100 units building depvelopment - SHOULD NOT APPROVE Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 4:06:00 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
As a long time resident at 4250 El Camino Real which will be directly impacted by this huge and compressed development.

My unit oversee this piece of land from my living room since decades and decades. It used to be a one level restaurant building ran by Dennys then So Hung restaurant.

The surrounding of its building were ample parking for the business. Peaceful and quiet and limited to restaurant daily patron visit.

Adjacent to this is also a piece of land at the moment owns by a real estate office and is two stories high.

The proposed development not only changed the landscape of our community but created a big mass of residents on this once small business lot.

It impacts peace, quiet and privacy at our community, added at least 150 vehicle traffic on this first block of Arastedero/El Camino Real and more importantly blocked views of our property affecting many residence facing this side of street. It impacts our safety walking around this stretch of community.

It depreciates our property at 4250 El Camino Real.

Seriously, it is a very bad proposal that impact our living here in every aspect.

Please retain the two level building height policy for this land whether it is business or residential development. Compressed living is not a way to improve lives for Palo Altans. We don't need more high rise in Palo Alto.

Sincerely,
Teck Yong
This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast

From: Marshall Blanchard
To: Council, City
Cc: Maggie Bening; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: 4256 El Camino Real development proposal, public comment Date: Friday, August 8, 2025 8:38:22 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i

August 7, 2025

TO: Palo Alto City Council Members
RE.: 4256 El Camino Real development proposal, public comment

As a resident of the Palo Alto Redwoods condo complex at 4250 El Camino Real, I am writing to express my serious concerns about the new development proposal for the adjacent property at 4256 El Camino Real.

While I recognize the need for more housing in Palo Alto, the proposed six-story 100-unit residential building is extremely out-of-scale for the size of the currently vacant lot. The submitted plans indicate that the building’s volume extends very close to the property line on all sides, with only about 6 feet of space on two sides between the building and the existing fence, and only slightly more space at the rear of the building. This wouldn’t leave room for the trees (including redwoods) that exist along the sides and back of the 4256 property; the building volume would even encroach on the canopy area of redwood trees on our side of the fence. I’ve looked at the volume of recently constructed buildings along El Camino relative to their respective lot size—they all seem to have reasonable air space on all sides. The submitted plans for this project lack provision for reasonable space between the project and adjacent buildings.

One problem of maximizing the volume of the building on the lot is that in the case of fire, the fire department would not have adequate access on the sides and back of the building—they couldn’t even set up a ladder, let alone drive the firetruck close to where it might be needed. [A better model is the Hilton Garden Inn, which has a driveway on the sides and back of their This message needs your attention
No employee in your company has ever replied to this person.

This is a personal email address.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
building (aside from firetruck, delivery truck, tour bus, and garbage truck access, it also affords generous airspace around the building).]

Moving around to the front of the proposed building, it doesn’t seem like the developer has thought through the logistical deficits of the current design. There is only a central entrance into the first floor mechanical-stacking parking area; there is no dedicated zone at the front where ride-share cars, delivery vans, mail trucks, (etc.) could temporarily park. I don’t know how garbage trucks and recycling trucks will maneuver on this property. Inevitably, there will be traffic backups along El Camino when residents wait their turn for the puzzle-lift mechanical stacking parking system; the bicycle lane cannot be used for drivers waiting to turn into the garage, so they’ll need to block an active traffic lane on El Camino.

The extreme density and 6-story height of this proposed building should not be given a variance. Squeezing 100 residential units into this building reminds me of the density of old tenement buildings in New York. Some of the apartments that face into the narrow interior courtyard won’t get adequate sun exposure and ventilation.

I live in a second-floor unit in the B-section of the Palo Alto Redwoods that directly faces the 4256 El Camino property. If the proposed 6-story residential building is constructed, my present sightlines will be blocked by the 6-story mass, eliminating my view of the sky and severely decreasing ambient light (because of the orientation of the B-section of our condo complex, I receive only a sliver of direct sunlight during the early morning and then late in the afternoon); with a huge building blocking my view, my unit will become very dark and depressing. Our condo property values will be affected. The windows in the new building would face directly into my bedroom and living room and rob me of privacy. The proximity of the new building is way too close. In Palo Alto neighborhoods with one-story single-family homes, there have been restrictions on the building of multi-story homes that would loom over neighboring homes; shouldn't the same standards apply if a proposed new construction would similarly affect the quality of life of neighboring condo owners?

Having a solid corridor of hotels, residence inns, and apartment & condo buildings along El Camino is creating a soulless “canyon” which does nothing for the quality of life of nearby residents; there are fewer and fewer shops and affordable restaurants along this section of El Camino in Palo Alto. I would recommend that any new development reserve space on the first floor (fronting on El Camino) for small commercial spaces, shops, cafés, (etc.) and reserve some space for parking (since the bicycle lane has eliminated parking for quick stops).

When the City Council and Architectural Review Board eventually examine hard plans for whatever will be constructed on the 4256 El Camino property, I hope they will advocate for a more human-scale development that will be a better fit to co-exist with the neighboring Palo Alto Redwoods. The present proposal is oppressive. I believe the same developer was involved with a prior proposal for this property (a boutique hotel), so they are aware of issues (shadow casts, the trees, etc.) that seem to have been ignored in the new proposal. I hope their strategy isn’t to attempt to push something through using the “builder’s remedy.” At least the hotel proposal gave a nod to setbacks as the building moved deeper into the lot (most of the 5-story volume fronted on El Camino).

I do support Palo Alto’s master plan and its aim to add more housing by encouraging denser construction along transportation corridors such as El Camino, and I trust that each proposal will be carefully examined.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Marshall Blanchard
Palo Alto Redwoods
4250 El Camino Real,
Unit B-215
Palo Alto, CA 94306
<[email protected]
>

From: amy wang
To: Council, City
Subject: Proposed Development at 4256 El Camino Real
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2025 11:16:27 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,
I am a resident of the Palo Alto Redwoods condominium complex, writing to strongly oppose the proposed six-story, 100+ unit building at 4256 El Camino Real.

This project would have a serious and permanent negative impact on our entire community. The new building would be right in front of our complex, completely blocking the open view and natural light we now enjoy. All units on all floors — from level 1 to level 4 — would be affected, not just a few. This is not a small issue. It changes the entire face of our building.

Right now, we face beautiful redwood trees and an open space that brings light and life to our homes. If this project goes forward, that will be replaced by a tall wall — like putting a jail wall right in front of our homes.

That’s how it feels. We live here, and this project would take away something very important from all of us.

The size, height, and scale of this building do not fit the neighborhood, and they do not respect the existing residents. I urge you to reject this proposal and protect the quality of life for current homeowners.

This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Sincerely,
Amy Wang
Resident, Palo Alto Redwoods
From: Jonathan Hull
To: Council, City
Cc: Maggie Bening
Subject: 4256 El Camino - Proposed Housing Project - Agenda Item - August 11, 2025 Date: Thursday, August 7, 2025 3:06:13 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,

I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto that is being rushed through Council under the Planned Home Zoning (PHZ) process "... a Palo Alto zoning mechanism that fell out of favor a decade ago, shortly after voters rejected a 'planned community' zone change that would have facilitated the construction of a 60-apartment complex for low-income seniors on Maybell Avenue. The following year, the City Council agreed not to use the process anymore, citing public
disillusion with it" [Palo Alto Online 8/5/25]. Since the planned community zoning change was rejected when it affected Maybell Ave., residents of El Camino Real deserve the same protection. The increased height and density limits and reduced parking and open space requirements that are possible under PHZ will cause increased traffic congestion on El Camino, as described below, and cause an unfair taking of two of our guest parking spots.

This project will significantly restrict traffic on El Camino and make it difficult for residents of our community to exit onto El Camino. This is because of the lack of parking for delivery trucks and other service vehicles and the proposed curb cut for their garage that will begin near our driveway. This means that trucks of all types will frequently block the right-most lane of traffic on El Camino. This problem will be exacerbated by the recently implemented bike lane that cannot be used for parking. Please note that we have ample space for large delivery trucks to drive onto our property and turn around before exiting onto El Camino. As we all know, with the increased usage of ecommerce in the last few years, those trucks are coming and going all day. The 4256 project does not have a similar driveway. The result will be a constant obstruction of traffic on El Camino that will negatively impact the thousands of vehicles that drive down El Camino every day. Not just those of me and my neighbors.

Also, guests of the multifamily development at 4256 El Camino Real will need a place to This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
park. The plan set only depicts 110 spaces, one for each resident. No spaces are provided for guests and there are no parking spaces on El Camino because of the bike lane. There are two parking spaces in the front of our community that are currently used by our guests. Undoubtedly, despite the whatever signage is posted near our spaces, our parking spaces will be used by guests of the 4256 property. This will be an unfair loss of use caused by the lack of adequate parking at the proposed project.

Furthermore, the 6 story condominium and apartment complex proposed at 4256 El Camino Real will tower over us and negatively impact us in many ways. It is too massive and will block light, increase noise levels, pose public health risks, create traffic safety issues, and permanently reduce the quiet enjoyment of our homes and common areas.

Considering the issues raised above, I urge the City Council to:

Conduct a thorough traffic and environmental impact study.

Ensure the project design respects the privacy and character of the existing neighborhood.

Provide sufficient infrastructure and parking to prevent spillover onto neighboring properties.

Maintain open communication with local residents and organizations during planning and construction.

While I support new housing in Palo Alto, I believe addressing these concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and future residents.

Sincerely,
Jonathan J. Hull, owner
4250 El Camino Real B120
Palo Alto, CA 94306
From: Jee-Young Park
To: Council, City
Cc: Nam-Mok “Steve” Zo
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real– Proposed Housing Project
Date: Thursday, August 7, 2025 1:06:41 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,
My name is Jee-Young Park, and I live at 4250 El Camino Real, directly next to the proposed site at 4256 El Camino Real.

When I moved into my unit last July, I was immediately struck by how much I loved the neighborhood—especially the natural light streaming into my home, the greenery surrounding the area, and the open, airy feel that made this place so livable. It brought me a deep sense of peace and well-being.

That’s why I was shocked to learn that a six-story building is planned right next door— something I was completely unaware of when I moved in. A structure of that size and scale will dominate the space, block sunlight, and fundamentally alter the atmosphere of Palo Alto that so many of us treasure.

I am genuinely worried about the impact this will have on our daily lives. This is not just about aesthetics—it’s about losing natural light, the sense of openness, and the balance between built and natural environments that makes this neighborhood special.

I respectfully urge the City Council to reconsider the scale of this development. A building limited to three stories would still provide housing, but in a way that respects the existing character of the neighborhood and preserves a livable environment for current residents.

Please also ensure that concerns about traffic, emergency access, and environmental impact are carefully studied and addressed. Most importantly, I ask that the voices of those who live right next to this project be included meaningfully in the process moving forward.

Thank you for your attention and for your service to our community.

Sincerely,
Jee-Young Park
This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
4250 El Camino Real A207
Palo Alto
From: James Wang
To: Council, City
Subject: Re: Proposed Six‑Story Building at 4256 El Camino Real (120 Units, ~91 ft tall) Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 11:26:08 PM
Attachments: Re- Proposed Six Story Building at 4256 El Camino Real (120 Units, ~91 ft tall).docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
This message needs your attention
The subject has non-English characters.

This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Dear Council Members:

As a resident of the adjacent Palo Alto Redwoods condominium complex, I write to express strong concern regarding the proposed six‑story residential development at 4256 El Camino Real.

1. Privacy, Light & View Impacts
The proposed project, rising approximately 79.5 feet (extending to 91 feet including mechanical equipment), would loom over our complex and blocks sky views from multiple units. Local neighbors poignantly capture this impact:
“I ask you to think of the idea of a 90 foot tall wall of windows and balconies blocking all light and views… invasion of privacy…” Wikipedia +12Palo Alto
Online+12San Francisco
YIMBY+12Ceqanet+2CEQAnet+2CEQAnet+2CEQAnet+2

2. Traffic & Parking Stress
Adding up to 120 units next door will significantly increase vehicular and pedestrian traffic on already-congested El Camino Real. Despite assurances from the developer of a 1:1 parking ratio with nearby arrangements, spillover and cut-through traffic remain serious concerns for resident safety and street parking availability Palo Alto Online .

3. Neighborhood Character & Property Value
This oversized development feels inconsistent with the scale of the established four-story Redwoods community. Historical objections to five-story proposals in this area reflect community resistance: “We don’t want to live in Manhattan” San Francisco YIMBY .

4. Diminished Quality of Life
Beyond light and view loss, neighbors fear a decline in open space, tree cover, and overall livability. The increase in units—from the original 100 to 120—is justified purely on financial grounds, rather than community benefit Palo Alto Online .

Maintain lower height and unit count to better align with neighborhood context and preserve privacy, light, and tree canopy.

Ensure truly adequate parking and traffic mitigation, not plan parking on off-site parcels.

Strengthen design requirements, including setbacks, landscaping, and architectural transitions to protect adjacent residences.

I urge the City Council to carefully consider these adverse impacts and work toward a scale and design that better respects the neighborhood and quality of life for existing residents.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Respectfully,
James Wang
4250 El Camino Real, Unit B114
Palo Alto, CA 94306
James Wang Aug 6, 2025
4250 El Camino Real, Unit B114, Palo Alto, CA 94306

City Council Members
City of Palo Alto
250 Hamilton Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94301
Re: Proposed Six-Story Building at 4256 El Camino Real (120 Units, ~91 ft tall) Dear Council Members:

As a resident of the adjacent Palo Alto Redwoods condominium complex 4250 , I write to express strong concern regarding the proposed six-story residential development at 4256 El Camino Real.

1. Privacy, Light & View Impacts
The proposed project, rising approximately 79.5 feet (extending to 91 feet including mechanical equipment), would loom over our complex and blocks sky views from multiple units. Local neighbors poignantly capture this impact:
“I ask you to think of the idea of a 90 foot tall wall of windows and balconies blocking all light and views… invasion of privacy…” Wikipedia+12Palo Alto Online+12San Francisco
YIMBY+12Ceqanet+2CEQAnet+2CEQAnet+2CEQAnet+2

3. Neighborhood Character & Property Value
This oversized development feels inconsistent with the scale of the established four-story Redwoods community.

Historical objections to five-story proposals in this area reflect community resistance: “We don’t want to live in Manhattan” San Francisco YIMBY.

For City Council Consideration:
• Maintain lower height and unit count to better align with neighborhood context and preserve privacy, light, and tree canopy.
• Ensure truly adequate parking and traffic mitigation, not plan parking on off-site parcels. • Strengthen design requirements, including setbacks, landscaping, and architectural transitions to protect adjacent residences.

I urge the City Council to carefully consider these adverse impacts and work toward a scale and design that better respects the neighborhood and quality of life for existing residents.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Respectfully,
James Wang ([email protected])
From: Hweiling Shu
To: Council, City
Cc: Hweiling Shu
Subject: 4256El Camino Real - Proposed Housing Project - PA City Council Agenda Item for August 11 Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 10:41:37 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear City Council,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed housing project at 4256 El Camino Real. As a resident of the Palo Alto Redwoods, I believe this matter could significantly affect our community in terms of the quality of life, environment, etc.

The proposed development will increase traffic congestion, the proposed height will block open sky views and overlook our homes and pool and is not harmonious with the neighborhood.

I urge the City Council to:
- Conduct a though traffic and environmental impact study. - Ensure that the project design respects the privacy and character of existing neighborhoods. - Provide sufficient infrastructure and parking to accommodate new residents and minimize spillover.
- Maintain open communication with residents and local organizations during all phases of planning and construction.

Thank you for your service and commitment to our community.

Sincerely,
Hweiling Shu
Palo Alto Redwoods,
4250 El Camino Real, Palo Alto
[email protected]
This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast

From: Олег
To: Council, City
Subject: Public Comment on 4250 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306 Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6:14:14 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Council Members,
I am a resident of Palo Alto Redwoods, located at 4250 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306, directly adjacent to the site of the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306. I am writing to express my concerns regarding this project and to respectfully request that the perspectives of neighboring residents be carefully considered.

Architectural and Neighborhood Character
Palo Alto Redwoods is an award-winning residential complex recognized for its exceptional design, community integration, and contribution to the architectural landscape of Palo Alto.

Specifically:

Gold Nugget Award (1984): Recognized for excellence in design, planning, and development in the Western United States, particularly for its innovative approach to multifamily housing in harmony with the natural environment.

Builders Choice Merit Award (1985): Honored for creative use of space, landscaping, and livability in medium-density residential design.

Maybeck Award (2010–2011): Given by the American Institute of Architects to projects demonstrating significant contributions to California architectural heritage.

These awards highlight the architectural and cultural significance of the complex. I live here and experience daily how thoughtfully it was integrated into the surrounding environment. It is a space full of light, trees, privacy, and respect for architectural heritage.

El Camino Real is a historic corridor that gives the area its unique spirit and reflects a continuity of thoughtful design. New developments should contribute to this identity, not compete with or overpower it.

This message needs your attention
No employee in your company has ever replied to this person.

This is a personal email address.

This person's name has non-English characters.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Unfortunately, the proposed project’s facade appears generic and lacks distinction. It resembles high-density mass housing with no character. Its scale and appearance raise concern that it may visually overwhelm the surroundings and disrupt the architectural rhythm that defines our neighborhood.

Concerns and Impacts on the Community

1. Privacy and Shadowing
The proposed 6-story building with a rooftop terrace would block views and cast shadows on apartments, the pool, and the clubhouse of Palo Alto Redwoods, compromising both sunlight and privacy.

2. Excessive Density and Lot Coverage
The project would cover 87% of the site, with no significant open green space or community-friendly landscaping. Plans show no trees, flowerbeds, or plantings. This level of density leaves almost no room for landscape design and creates a sense of crowding, which conflicts with principles of sustainable development.

3. No Renewable Energy Integration
There is no mention of solar panels or other alternative energy sources, despite California’s climate and sustainability goals.

4. Limited Electrical Infrastructure Preparedness
The plans provide no indication of power reserve capacity or electrical upgrades. With electric vehicle adoption increasing, the lack of preparation for EV charging — both for the project site and surrounding buildings — raises concerns about potential stress on the existing power grid. As more residents convert to electric vehicles, available electrical capacity must remain sufficient for future demands.

5. Wildlife Disruption
Palo Alto Redwoods is home to a stable population of owls and other wildlife. In addition, the nearby Adobe Creek corridor supports various species of birds and small animals, creating a fragile ecosystem that could be threatened by increased noise, lighting, and activity. The proposal includes no mention of a biological survey or environmental protections. Given the site's proximity to green habitat, this omission poses a threat to local species and ecological balance.

6. Parking and Traffic
With only 0.83 parking spaces per unit and no guest parking indicated, the project could push overflow parking into adjacent streets and compromise emergency access. No transportation mitigation plan has been presented.

7. Noise, Dust, and Construction Pollution
The construction site is less than 50 feet from nearby residences, yet no health protections are described. Families and seniors living nearby will be directly impacted by dust, noise, and limited access during the construction phase.

8. Property Value and Tax Base Impact
Reduced privacy, degraded views, noise, and congestion may lead to lower home values at Palo Alto Redwoods. This, in turn, could reduce the property tax base for Santa Clara County, affecting funding for schools, infrastructure, and emergency services.

I respectfully request the Council to:

Require an independent assessment of the project’s environmental and infrastructure impacts;
Scale down the building’s height and density;
Increase setbacks from neighboring properties;
Require meaningful landscaping and renewable energy integration; Ensure full compliance with El Camino Real Design Guidelines.

Best regards,
Oleg Kharitonov
Email:
[email protected]
P.S. I kindly request confirmation that this comment has been received and that it will be included in the official record for the 4256 El Camino Real project. Thank you for your attention.

From: [email protected]
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real Council pre-screening meeting Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 5:00:20 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.

Topic: crowded 4256 El Camino Real : project
Why not build a hotel???
Dear city councilman,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the 4256 Elcamino Real poorly designed housing project.

As a resident of the neighborhood, I believe this matter could significantly affect the immediate community in terms of congextive traffic, high desnity living conditon with studio and one bedroom units, inadequate parking spaces in proposal.

Concern:

Tracffic congestion on already crowded Major road: El Camino Real .

There are only 100 parking spaces for 100 units.

Units breakdown:
44 studios
44 one bedroom units
8 two bedroom units
4 three bedroom units
-----------------------------------
100 total units.

Puzzle Lift Stacker parking style:

Each Puzzle module can hold 6-50 cars.

Drivers park their car in entry platform, and lifted to available spot.

Only one car can go in and out of the system - commute hours will create problems for residents.

Need to empty grocery, backpacks or furniture before car enters platform (takes time).

During power outage, no car can go in or out.

Imagine during busy time to go to work or school, you have to load everything into your care before driving away from the platform.

Please remember On El Camino Real where we have designated bike lanes,there is no parking on the street where you can load or unload your stuff from your car before you enter or exit the car platform.

Please STOP this project!!
No Plaza, no playground, no gym, or clubhouse or swimming pool either, for the well- being of the residents who live in a small cram space:studios or one bedrooms.........

We need to have quality housing - not boxed homes like in the slump areas or housing projects in San Francisco. We need livable housing in Palo Alto!! It’s our pride.

Please don't give up quality of living in Palo Alto for Quantity housing projects in government subsidized areas.

Thank you very much for your time. I believe addressing these 2 main concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and futrue residents.

I appreciate your attention to this matter and encourage the city council to take these concerns into careful consideration.

Sincerely,
Marie Deleon
Resident behind Cabana hotel
[email protected]

From: [email protected]
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real Council pre-screening meeting Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 4:52:21 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.

4256 El Camino Real :housing project
Dear city council members,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the 4256 Elcamino Real poorly designed housing project.

Concern:

Tracffic congestion on already crowded Major road: El Camino Real .

There are only 100 parking spaces for 100 units.

Units breakdown:
44 studios
44 one bedroom units
8 two bedroom units
4 three bedroom units
-----------------------------------
100 total units.

Puzzle Lift Stacker parking style:

Each Puzzle module can hold 6-50 cars.

Drivers park their car in entry platform, and lifted to available spot.

Only one car can go in and out of the system - commute hours will create problems for residents.

Need to empty grocery, backpacks or furniture before car enters platform (takes time).

During power outage, no car can go in or out.

Imagine during busy time to go to work or school, you have to load everything into your care before driving away from the platform.

Please STOP this poorly designed project.
__________________________________________________________________________________ No Plaza, rest area or clubhouse or swimming pool either, for the well- being of the residents who live in a small cram space:studios or one bedrooms.........

We need to have quality housing - not boxed homes like in the slump areas or housing projects in SAn Francisco. We need livable housing.

Please don't give up quality of living in Palo Alto for Quantity housing projects in government subsidized areas.

Thank you very much for your time. I believe addressing these 2 main concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and futrue residents.

I appreciate your attention to this matter and encourage the city council to take these concerns into careful consideration.

Sincerely,
Mary Young
Charleston Meadow resident
[email protected]
From: Kathleen Turner
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real Building Project - August 11 City Council Meeting Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 3:38:29 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear City Council,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed building project at 4256 El Camino Real. I believe this matter could significantly affect our community in terms of traffic and safety, parking shortages, privacy and height, environmental impact and property values.

The proposed development will increase traffic congestion on El Camino Real, making it unsafe for pedestrians and cyclists. And how will parking needs be accommodated, particularly now that the new bicycle lanes preclude any parking on El Camino Real?
I'm also concerned about how the proposed height will impact the privacy of many of our units and block the light needed for our vegetation.

I urge the City Council to:
- Conduct a thorough traffic and environmental impact study. - Ensure that the project design reflects the privacy and character of existing neighborhoods. - Provide sufficient infrastructure and parking to accommodate new residents and minimize spillover. - Maintain open communication with residents and local organizations during all phases of planning and construction.

I believe addressing these concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and future residents. I appreciate your attention to this matter and encourage you to take these points into careful consideration.

Sincerely,
Kathy Turner
Resident
Palo Alto Redwoods
4250 El Camino Real, D229
Palo Alto, CA 94306
[email protected]
650-283-9012
This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
From: Liza Baskind
To: Council, City
Subject: August 11th Pre-screening of project 4256 ECR
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 1:17:33 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto. As a neighbor, I believe this project will significantly affect our community’s quality of life.

Concerns:

The development will increase traffic congestion on El Camino, creating unsafe conditions for pedestrians and cyclists.

I am also concerned about fire safety and emergency vehicle access due to inadequate setbacks for service vehicles.

I urge the City Council to:

Conduct a thorough traffic and environmental impact study.

Ensure the project design respects the privacy and character of the existing neighborhood. Its current design is too massive for the parcel.

Provide sufficient infrastructure and parking to prevent spillover onto neighboring properties.

Maintain open communication with local residents and organizations during planning and construction.

While I support new housing in Palo Alto, I believe addressing these concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and future residents.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Liza Baskind
From: Anne-Marie Jumeau
To: Council, City
Subject: Fwd: Palo Alto City Council Letter re 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306 Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 10:32:18 AM
Attachments: PA City Council Letter - 08-06-2025.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Jumeau, Anne-Marie <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 10:26 AM
Subject: Palo Alto City Council Letter re 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306 To: Anne-Marie Jumeau <[email protected]
>
Attached letter is for the Palo Alto City Council.

Thank you!
Anne-Marie Jumeau

This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
August 6, 2025
E
mail: [email protected]
Palo Alto City Council
250 Hamilton Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94301
R
e: 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306
D
ear City Council,
I am writing regarding the proposed building project on the vacant lot at 4256 El Camino Real. I understand that a large housing development has been proposed next to Palo Alto Redwoods, located at 4250 El Camino Real, where I am a resident. I believe that the proposed large project will have a negative effect on our quality of life, safety and property values.

I respectfully request the City Council to:
• Conduct both traffic and environmental studies;
• E
nsure that the project design respects the privacy and character of the existing structures surrounding the lot; and
• P
rovide parking to accommodate all residents.

Please take into consideration the above-mentioned so a better outcome is reached for both current and future residents. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

S
incerely,
A
nne-Marie Jumeau
4250 El Camino Real, D132
Palo Alto, CA 94306
E-mail: [email protected]

From: Josh -
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Letter
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 10:32:06 AM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Hello and thank you for reading.

I am writing to express deep concerns about the scale and impact of this particular project, and to respectfully request that the Council require further study and modifications before moving forward. I support the broader goal of responsibly increasing housing availability in Palo Alto and would support thoughtful development of the 4256 site.

The current proposed project would force our complex, along with nearby homes and businesses, to face various unmitigated impacts. They include:

Traffic and Safety:

Increased density at this location will exacerbate congestion along El Camino Real and side streets, especially during peak hours. Our community already experiences challenges with emergency vehicle access, which this development would worsen.

As an example, the Hilton Garden Inn at 4216 El Camino Real has led to traffic issues despite impact studies, a clear indication that past traffic impact assessments have underestimated the results of increasing density along El Camino.

Parking Overflow:

The proposed on-site parking for the 4256 project is insufficient given the number of units. This will inevitably force overflow onto neighboring properties, potentially including our very limited guest parking areas.

Privacy and Fit: A 91-foot-tall building looming over our homes and shared pool area would significantly reduce our privacy and obstruct natural light. The proposed height and massing are entirely out of scale with our residential neighborhood and will degrade the quality of life for existing residents.

Construction Impacts:

Prolonged construction would bring sustained noise, dust, debris, and access restrictions, affecting daily life for hundreds of nearby residents for years. I understand that some construction impact on neighbors is inevitable in a development situation, but it can be mitigated by adjusting the scale of the project and requiring proper precautions and clean up.

Environmental Harm:

Our complex 's redwood trees are a beautiful part of the local skyline and ecosystem. The project is likely to severely harm or kill some of our redwood trees. It This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
would be a great loss to our community, including birds like the owls that nest in these trees.

The inevitable increase in stormwater runoff and degradation of local air quality also raise serious environmental concerns that have yet to be fully addressed.

I am not not opposed to new housing. I hope to see the 4256 site developed into housing that will fit, and help improve, the surrounding community. Please take the time to carefully weigh the long-term impacts of this project and work toward a solution that respects both the city's housing goals and the wellbeing of neighboring residents and businesses.

Thank you for your service and for your thoughtful consideration of this matter.

Sincerely,
Josh Knowles-Hinrichs
Palo Alto Redwoods Homeowner
4250 El Camino Real D239
Palo Alto, CA 94306
From: Karen O"Rourke
To: Council, City
Cc: Karen O"Rourke
Subject: 4256 El Camino proposed building
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5:52:25 PM
Dear City Council Members,
I am writing to express my strong objection to the new building proposal at 4256 El Camino Real. As a resident of the adjacent Palo Alto Redwoods community, I believe this project presents several significant concerns:
* **Invasion of Privacy:** The proposed building's close proximity to my bedroom would result in a direct line of sight into and from units, compromising privacy for both parties. * **Increased Noise:** We have endured considerable noise from recent projects along El Camino Real, and the prospect of ongoing construction and increased activity from a new building is disheartening, as it would prolong the disruption. * **Dust and Air Quality:** Construction would undoubtedly generate substantial dust, making it difficult to enjoy my balcony and keep bedroom windows open during warmer weather, leading to additional cleaning burdens.
* **Sunshine Blockage:** Having chosen my unit specifically for its abundant natural sunlight, a new building of this scale would likely block this essential amenity, negatively impacting my living experience.
* **Potential Damage to Redwoods:** The beautiful redwood trees were a key reason for purchasing my home in this complex. I urge you to confirm whether a comprehensive study has been conducted to assess and mitigate any potential damage to these trees. * **Exacerbated Traffic:** El Camino Real already experiences significant traffic congestion.

Adding an estimated 100 or more cars from a new development would further worsen traffic flow and make exiting our complex during peak hours even more challenging. * **Aesthetic Impact:** From an aesthetic perspective, the proposed building design is, in my opinion, unattractive and would detract from the overall appearance of the neighborhood.

Beyond these immediate concerns, I anticipate that the aforementioned issues would negatively impact my property value.

Instead of this proposal, I would like to suggest an alternative use for the property: a public fast electric charging station. Such a facility would address the current scarcity of fast chargers, benefiting many drivers, including residents of Palo Alto Redwoods. I envision people walking to nearby establishments like Dinah's and Hobee's while their vehicles charge, which could generate revenue for the city and support local businesses. Perhaps a small coffee shop could even be integrated into the design.

I strongly urge you to reject this proposal.

Sincerely,
Karen O'Rourke
From: Mary Lou Torre
To: Council, City
Subject: 4256 El Camino Real [25PLN-00095]
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 4:52:50 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Subject - 4256 El Camino - Proposed Housing Project - Agenda Item - August 11, 2025 Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,
I would like not only to express my support for additional housing in Palo Alto, but also to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto.

As a resident of the Palo Alto Redwoods at 4250 El Camino Real, I am happy to have housing built next door. I love living in the Redwoods and would welcome an attractive apartment complex at 4256 El Camino Real.

However, I believe the size of the proposed project is out of scale with the size of the lot. 120 units in a six-story structure on a lot that once housed a single restaurant is like forcing a 300-pound linebacker to sit on a child's chair. It can be done, but it's not a good idea.

Like my neighbors, I am concerned about traffic congestion, fire safety, and emergency vehicle access due to inadequate setbacks.

Please, as you consider this project proposal,
Conduct a thorough traffic and environmental impact study.

Ensure the project design respects the privacy and character of the existing neighborhood.

Ensure the project provides sufficient infrastructure and parking to prevent traffic hazards and parking spillover onto neighboring properties.

Maintain open communication with local residents and organizations during planning and construction.

While I most definitely support new housing in Palo Alto, I believe addressing these concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and future residents.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
Best regards,
Mary Lou Torre
From: CR Conroy
To: Council, City
Cc: Maggie Benning; Diane Walker
Subject: Proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real - to be discussed at the City Council Meeting on Monday, August 11, 2025
Date: Monday, August 4, 2025 3:52:38 PM
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.
i
Dear Palo Alto City Council Members,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed development at 4256 El Camino Real, Palo Alto. As an owner of a condominium unit at the Palo Alto Redwoods, I believe this project will significantly affect the safety and overall quality of life of the residents of the Palo Alto Redwoods and of the residents in the wider community.

My concerns include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

The development will increase traffic congestion on El Camino, creating unsafe conditions for pedestrians and cyclists and additional safety concerns for drivers.

The setbacks are inadequate for service vehicles creating increased risks related to fire safety and emergency vehicle access.

The project as currently proposed is too dense for the size of the lot to be built on and should be scaled back to minimize safety hazards and community impact.

I urge the City Council to:

Conduct a thorough traffic and environmental impact study.

Ensure the project design respects the privacy and character of the existing neighborhood; ensure the project is “right-sized” for the size of the lot.

Provide sufficient infrastructure and parking accommodate new residents and minimize spillover onto neighboring properties and nearby neighborhoods.

Maintain open communication with local residents and organizations during all phases of planning and construction.

This message needs your attention
This is a personal email address.

This is their first email to your company.

Mark Safe Report
Powered by Mimecast
While I support new housing in Palo Alto, I believe addressing these concerns will lead to better outcomes for both current and future residents. I appreciate your attention to this matter and encourage the City Council to take the points raised above into careful consideration.

Thank you for your service and commitment to our community, and for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Christine Conroy
Owner Unit C225 at the Palo Alto Redwoods, 4250 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, CA 94306

Palo Alto City CouncilAugust 11, 2025

Palo Alto City Council
August 11, 2025