Agenda packet — Palo Alto City Council, October 6, 2025 (part 1 of 4)

CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Monday, October 06, 2025
Council Chambers & Hybrid
5:30 PM
Amended Agenda
Amended agenda items appear below in RED

Palo Alto City Council meetings will be held as “hybrid” meetings with the option to attend by teleconference or in person. Information on how the public may observe and participate in the meeting is located at the end of the agenda.

The meeting will be broadcast on Cable TV Channel
26, live on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/c/cityofpaloalto
, and streamed to Midpen Media
Center
https://midpenmedia.org
.

VIRTUAL PARTICIPATION

CLICK HERE TO JOIN

(
https://cityofpaloalto.zoom.us/j/362027238
)
Meeting ID: 362 027 238 Phone:1(669)900-6833

PUBLIC COMMENTS
General

Public

Comment

for

items

not

the

agenda

will

accepted

person

for

three
minutes

amount

time

determined

the

Chair.

General

public

comment

will

heard
for

30 minutes.

Additional

public

comments,

any,

will

heard

the

end

the

agenda.

Public

comments

for

agendized

items

will

accepted

both

person

and

via

Zoom

for

to
three

minutes

amount

time

determined

the

Chair.

Requests

speak

will

taken
until

5 minutes

after

the

staff’s

presentation

determined

the

Chair.

Written

public
comments

can

submitted

advance

[email protected]

and

will

provided

to
the

Council

and

available

for

inspection

the

City’s

website.

Please

clearly

indicate

which
agenda item you are referencing in your subject line.

PowerPoints,

videos,

other

media

presented

during

public

comment

are

accepted

only
by

[email protected]

least

24 hours

prior

the

meeting.

Once

received,

the

Clerk

will

have

them

shared

public

comment

for

the

specified

item.

uphold

strong
cybersecurity

management

practices,

USB’s

other

physical

electronic

storage

devices

are

not
accepted.

Signs

and

symbolic

materials

less

than

2 feet

3 feet

are

permitted

provided

that:

(1)

sticks,
posts,

poles

similar/other

type

handle

objects

are

strictly

prohibited;

(2)

the

items

not
create

facility,

fire,

safety

hazard;

and

(3)

persons

with

such

items

remain

seated

when
displaying

them

and

must

not

raise

the

items

above

shoulder

level,

obstruct

the

view

passage
of other attendees, or otherwise disturb the business of the meeting.

TIME ESTIMATES
Listed

times

are

estimates

only

and

are

subject

change

any

time,

including

while

the
meeting

progress.

The

Council

reserves

the

right

use

less

time

any

item,

to
change

the

order

items

and/or

continue

items

another

meeting.

Particular

items

may

be
heard

before

after

the

time

estimated

the

agenda.

This

may

occur

order

best
manage the time at a meeting or to adapt to the participation of the public.

1 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

CALL TO ORDER

SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (5:30 - 5:45 PM)

1. Proclamation Recognizing Fire Prevention Week – October 5-11, 2025

2. Review Applications and Select Candidates to Interview for the Human Relations Commission (HRC), Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), and Public Art Commission (PAC) Vacancies; CEQA Status: Not a Project

AGENDA CHANGES, ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS

PUBLIC COMMENT (5:45 - 6:15 PM)
Members of the public may speak in-person ONLY to any item NOT on the agenda. 1-3 minutes depending on number of speakers. Public Comment is limited to 30 minutes. Additional public comments, if any, will be heard at the end of the agenda.

COUNCIL MEMBER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS (6:15 - 6:30 PM) Members of the public may not speak to the item(s).

STUDY SESSION (6:30 - 7:30 PM)

3. San Antonio Road Area Plan: Provide Feedback on Existing Conditions Analysis and Land Use and Mobility Priorities. CEQA Status: Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15262.

CONSENT CALENDAR (7:30 - 7:35 PM)
Items will be voted in one motion unless removed from the calendar by three Council Members.

4. Approval of FY 2025 Reappropriation Requests to FY 2026 Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets and Additional Technical Clean-Up Actions and Corresponding Amendments to the FY 2026 Budget Appropriation for Various Funds. CEQA Status: Not a Project

5. Approval of Construction Contract No. C25195264 with Precision Engineering, Inc. in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $6,842,121 and Authorization for the City Manager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Change Orders for Related Additional but Unforeseen Work that May Develop During the Project Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $684,212 for the Hamilton Avenue Capacity Upgrades Project (SD-25000), and Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Stormwater Management Fund; CEQA Status – Exempt under

2 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c)

6. Approval of Professional Service Contract No. C26194618 with SCS Field Services in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $1,513,890, to Provide Landfill Gas Monitoring, Reporting, and Well Installation Services for the City’s Closed Landfill for a Period of Five Years, and Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Refuse Fund; CEQA Status – Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15301

7. Approval of Construction Contract No. C26193446 with MP Nexlevel of California, Inc., in the Amount Not-to-Exceed $13,600,187 and Authorization for the City Manager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Changes Orders Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $1,060,018 for a Total Not to Exceed Amount of $14,660,205 Over Three Years to Provide Utility Trench and Substructure Installations; CEQA status: Exempt, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, 15302, and/or 15303; for Fiber-to-the-Premises work, Council Action on This Item is Within the Scope of the Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Fiber-to-the-Premises Project, adopted on June 17, 2024.

8. Approval of Construction Contract C25194006 with SCC Electric, Inc. in the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $997,500, and Authorization for the City Manager or Their Designee to Negotiate and Execute Change Orders Up to a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $99,750 for the Utilities Control Center Generator Replacement Project as part of the Building Systems Improvements Project (PF-01003); and Approve Amendment to the FY 2026 Budget in the Capital Improvement and Electric Funds; CEQA Status - Exempt under CEQA Guideline Sections 15301 and 15302

9. Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Number S23185432 with Koffler Electrical Mechanical Apparatus Repair, Inc. in the Amount of $230,000 for a New Not-to Exceed Amount of $460,000, and Extending the Term through September 29, 2027, for Electric Motors and Submersible Pump Service at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant; CEQA Status – Exempt under Section 15301(b)
AA1.

Approve the selection of Teri Black & Company as the executive recruitment firm for the recruitment of the City Attorney and Approve the Recruitment General Timeline as Recommended by the Council Appointed Officers (CAO) Committee. CEQA status – not a project.

New Item Added
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS (7:35 - 7:50 PM)

3 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

BREAK (15 MINUTES)

ACTION ITEMS (Item 10: 8:05 - 9:05 PM, Item 11: 9:05 - 10:00 PM) Include: Report of Committees/Commissions, Ordinances and Resolutions, Public Hearings, Report of Officials, Unfinished Business and Council Matters.

10. Adoption of Eight Ordinances Amending Various Sections of the Palo Alto Municipal Code (PAMC) Related to the 2025 California Building Standards Code (CA Code of Regulations Title 24) Update, including: (1) Chapter 16.04 Incorporating the 2025 CA Building Code With Local Amendments; (2) Chapter 16.05 Incorporating the 2025 CA Mechanical Code With Local Amendments; (3) Chapter 16.06 Incorporating the 2025 CA Residential Code With Local Amendments; (4) Chapter 16.08 Incorporating the 2025 CA Plumbing Code With Local Amendments; (5) Chapter 16.14 Incorporating the 2025 CA Green Building Standards Code with Local Amendments; (6) Chapter 16.16 Incorporating the 2022 CA Electrical Code With Local Amendments; (7) Chapter 16.18 Incorporating the 2024 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code With Local Amendments; (8) Chapter 16.17 Incorporating the 2025 CA Energy Code With Local Amendments; Direction to Staff to Return to Council on the Consent Calendar with Ordinances Adopting the 2025 Editions of the California Wildlands-Urban Interface Code and California Fire Code with Local Amendments; Approve a Budget Amendment in the General Fund . CEQA Status: Exempt Under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15308.

11. Review of State and Local Ballot Measures Appearing on the November 4, 2025 Ballot and Consideration of Possible City Council Positions

ADJOURNMENT

INFORMATION REPORTS
Information reports are provided for informational purposes only to the Council and the public but are not listed for action or discussion during this meeting’s agenda.

A.
2024 Annual Airport Noise Report and 2025 Noise Program Initiatives

OTHER INFORMATION
Standing Committee Meetings this week

Finance Committee October 7, 2025 CANCELED

4 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

City Schools Liaison Committee October 9, 2025 CANCELED

Public Comment Letters
Schedule of Meetings

AMENDED AGENDA ITEMS

AA1.

New Item Added

5 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

PUBLIC COMMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Members

the

Public

may

provide

public

comments

teleconference

meetings

via

email,
teleconference, or by phone.

1. Written public comments
may be submitted by email to
[email protected]
.

2. For

person

public

comments

please

complete

speaker

request

card

located

the
table

the

entrance

the

Council

Chambers

and

deliver

the

Clerk

prior

to
discussion of the item.

3. Spoken

public

comments

for

agendized

items

using

computer

smart

phone

will

be
accepted

through

the

teleconference

meeting.

address

the

Council,

click

the

link
below to access a Zoom-based meeting. Please read the following instructions carefully. ◦
You

may

download

the

Zoom

client

connect

the

meeting

in-

browser.

using
your

browser,

make

sure

you

are

using

current,

up-to-date

browser:

Chrome

30 ,
Firefox

27 ,

Microsoft

Edge

12 ,

Safari

7 .

Certain

functionality

may

disabled

in
older

browsers

including

Internet

Explorer.

download

the

Zoom

application

onto
your

smart

phone

from

the

Apple

App

Store

Google

Play

Store

and

enter

the
Meeting ID below.
◦
You

may

asked

enter

address

and

name.

request

that

you
identify

yourself

name

this

will

visible

online

and

will

used

notify

you
that it is your turn to speak.
◦
When

you

wish

speak

Agenda

Item,

click

“raise

hand.”

The

Clerk

will
activate

and

unmute

speakers

turn.

Speakers

will

notified

shortly

before

they
are called to speak.
◦
When

called,

please

limit

your

remarks

the

time

limit

allotted.

timer

will

be
shown on the computer to help keep track of your comments.

4. Spoken

public

comments

for

agendized

items

using

phone

use

the

telephone

number
listed

below.

When

you

wish

speak

agenda

item

hit

your

phone

we
know

that

you

wish

speak.

You

will

asked

provide

your

first

and

last

name

before
addressing

the

Council.

You

will

advised

how

long

you

have

speak.

When

called
please limit your remarks to the agenda item and time limit allotted.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN
Meeting ID: 362-027-238 Phone: 1-669-900-6833
Americans

with

Disability

Act

(ADA)

the

policy

the

City

Palo

Alto

offer

its

public
programs,

services

and

meetings

manner

that

readily

accessible

all.

Persons

with
disabilities

who

require

materials

appropriate

alternative

format

who

require

auxiliary
aids

access

City

meetings,

programs,

services

may

contact

the

City’s

ADA

Coordinator

at
(650)

329-2550

(voice)

emailing

[email protected]
.

Requests

for

assistance

or
accommodations

must

submitted

least

24 hours

advance

the

meeting,

program,

or
service.

6 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

California

Government

Code

§84308
,

commonly

referred

the

"Levine

Act,"

prohibits

an
elected

official

local

government

agency

from

participating

proceeding

involving

a
license,

permit,

other

entitlement

for

use

the

official

received

campaign

contribution
exceeding

$500

from

party

participant,

including

their

agents,

the

proceeding

within

the
last

12 months.

“license,

permit,

other

entitlement

for

use”

includes

most

land

use

and
planning

approvals

and

the

approval

contracts

that

are

not

subject

lowest

responsible

bid
procedures

and

have

value

over

$50,000.

“party”

person

who

files

application

for,

or
is

the

subject

of,

proceeding

involving

license,

permit,

other

entitlement

for

use.

A
“participant”

person

who

actively

supports

opposes

particular

decision

proceeding
involving

license,

permit,

other

entitlement

for

use,

and

has

financial

interest

the
decision.

The

Levine

Act

incorporates

the

definition

“financial

interest”

the

Political

Reform
Act,

which

encompasses

interests

business

entities,

real

property,

sources

income,

sources
of

gifts,

and

personal

finances

that

may

affected

the

Council’s

actions.

you

qualify

a
“party”

“participant”

proceeding,

and

you

have

made

campaign

contribution

a
Council

Member

exceeding

$500

made

within

the

last

12 months,

you

must

disclose

the
campaign contribution before making your comments.

7 October 06, 2025
Materials submitted after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection at www.paloalto.gov/agendas
.

City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
Lead Department: Fire
Meeting Date: October 6, 2025
Report #:2508-5062
TITLE
Proclamation Recognizing Fire Prevention Week – October 5-11, 2025

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Fire Prevention Week Proclamation
APPROVED BY:

Geoffrey Blackshire, Fire Chief
Item 1
Item 1 Staff Report

Item 1: Staff Report
Pg.
1 Packet Pg. 8 of 541

FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
October 5-11, 2025

WHEREAS, the City of Palo Alto is committed to ensuring the safety and security of all those living in, working in, and visiting the community; and

WHEREAS, lithium-ion battery fires are on the rise and are primarily caused by thermal runaway, a chain reaction triggered by damage, overcharging, or manufacturing defects . Micromobility devices like e -bikes, scooters, laptops and cellphones are frequently involved in fires; and

WHEREAS, all household members should develop and practice a home fire safety and escape plan that includes:
buying, charging, and recycling lithium-ion batteries safely; having two exits from every room in the home with a path to the outside from exits ; installing smoke alarms in all required locations ; and designating a meeting place outside where everyone in the home will meet upon exiting; and

WHEREAS, the City of Palo Alto Fire Department first responders are dedicated to reducing the occurrence of home fires and home fire injuries through prevention and education; and

WHEREAS, City of Palo Alto residents are encouraged to participate in public education measures, so that they can take personal steps to increase their safety from fire; and

WHEREAS, the 2025 Fire Prevention Week theme, “Charge into Safety: Lithium -Ion Batteries in Your Home” effectively serves to educate the public about simple but important steps they can take to help reduce the risk of lithium- ion battery fires, keeping themselves and those around them safe.

NOW, THEREFORE I, Ed Lauing, Mayor of the City of Palo Alto, on behalf of the entire City Council, do hereby proclaim October 5-11, 2025 as Fire Prevention Week in the City of Palo Alto, and urge all community members to participate in the public safety activities and efforts of the City of Palo Alto Fire and Emergency Services Departments during Fire Prevention Week.

Presented: October 6, 2025

______________________________
Ed Lauing
Mayor

Proclamation
Item 1
Attachment A - Fire
Prevention Week
Proclamation

Item 1: Staff Report
Pg.
2 Packet Pg. 9 of 541

City Council
Staff Report
From: City Clerk
Report Type: SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
Lead Department: City Clerk
Meeting Date: October 6, 2025
Report #:2508-5096
TITLE
Review Applications and Select Candidates to Interview for the Human Relations Commission (HRC), Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC), and Public Art Commission (PAC) Vacancies; CEQA Status: Not a Project

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council select up to 8 candidates to interview for HRC, up to 8 candidates to interview for PRC, and up to 8 candidates to interview for PAC.

BACKGROUND
Per Council direction 1, recruitments for Boards, Commissions, and Committees (BCC) are split into fall and spring cycles. HRC, PAC, and PRC are included in the fall cycle. At its May 5, 2025 meeting, the City Council approved a process to select which applicants to interview for BCC vacancies2. The number of interviewees varies based on the number of vacancies.

Councilmembers will vote on whom to interview, getting twice the number of votes as there are openings. The top vote getters are interviewed.
Interview all candidates if there are 6 or fewer applicants Interview up to 6 candidates when there are 1-2 openings Interview up to 8 candidates when there are 3 openings Interview up to 10 candidates when there are 4 openings Membership requirements for HRC, PRC, and PAC are listed below. Additionally, no commissioners can be Councilmembers, officers, or employees of the City. 1 May 13, 2024 City Council Action Minutes, Agenda Item #12:
https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=83921&repo=r-704298fc 2 City Council, May 5, 2025; Agenda Item #11, SR# 2504-4537 https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=170171&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=96ab4134-36ab-4d1c- ad78-fe4f32f2250e
Item 2
Item 2 Staff Report

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
1 Packet Pg. 10 of 541

Human Relations Commission – Palo Alto residency 5.
Parks and Recreation Commission – Palo Alto residency and demonstrated interest in parks, open space and recreation matters6.
Public Art Commission - shall be either members of the architectural review board or professional visual artists, professional visual arts educators, professional visual arts scholars, or visual arts collectors whose authorities and skills are known and respected in the community and, whenever feasible, who have demonstrated an interest in, and have participated in, the arts program of the city7.

ANALYSIS
The Fall 2025 Boards and Commissions recruitment opened on August 22, 2025, and closed on September 24, 2025. HRC, PAC, and PRC each have three full-term vacancies. A summary of the applications and interview selection process is included in the below table:

Board/Commission Number of
Vacancies
Number of
Applicants
Number of
Candidates to
Interview
Number of Votes
per
Councilmember
Human Relations
Commission
3 (Seat #s: 2,
3, 7)
12 (including 2
incumbents)
Up to 8 6
Parks and
Recreation
Commission
3 (Seat #s: 2,
3, 4)
10 (including 1
incumbent)
Up to 8 6
Public Art
Commission
3 (Seat #s: 1,
4, 7)
10 Up to 8 6
Councilmembers will submit their votes for whom to interview to the City Clerk, and the City Clerk will announce the results at the October 6, 2025 City Council meeting. BCC candidate interviews are tentatively scheduled for the October 15, 2025 City Council Special Meeting. Each interview will be scheduled for 10 minutes. Candidates will have an opportunity to summarize their experiences, and the remaining time will be allocated to Councilmember questions.

Appointments are tentatively scheduled for the October 22, 2025 City Council Special Meeting.

Councilmembers will appoint candidates through live voting conducted during the meeting. The City Clerk will announce the results of the vote.

5 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 1.22.010 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0- 0-0-61320
6 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 2.25.020 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0- 0-0-61402
7 Palo Alto Municipal Code Section 2.18.020 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/paloalto/latest/paloalto_ca/0- 0-0-61257
Item 2
Item 2 Staff Report

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
2 Packet Pg. 11 of 541

FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
None.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
City staff publicized the recruitment through the City’s Uplift Local community newsletter, City Clerk’s Office newsletters, the City’s website, and the City’s social media channels. The recruitment was also advertised in both print and online in the Palo Alto Daily Post and Palo Alto Weekly. Recruitment information was also posted at Palo Alto libraries and City Hall and emailed to previous applicants, community-based organizations and businesses related to the commissions’ issue areas.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council action on this item is not a project as defined by CEQA because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: HRC Applications - Redacted
Attachment B: PRC Applications - Redacted
Attachment C: PAC Applications - Redacted
APPROVED BY:

Mahealani Ah Yun, City Clerk
Item 2
Item 2 Staff Report

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
3 Packet Pg. 12 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 18 September 2025, 9:10pm
Receipt number 60
Related form version 15
Name Allyson C. Rosen
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Other: a friend told me about this
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
4 Packet Pg. 13 of 541

Read the code, and check only ONE option below: I give permission for the City of Palo Alto to post to the City’s website the attached Board and Commission Application intact. I have read and understand my rights under Government Code Section 6254.21. I may revoke this permission at any time by providing written notice to the Palo Alto City Clerk.

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Clinical Neuropsychologist/Dementia Education Director/Researcher Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I am a board certified, licensed, clinical, neuropsychologist. I have been working at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs for the past 20 years but my work on the HRC would be as a private citizen. I have supervised clinical Ph.D. trainees and have organized clinical education programs for health professionals typically focused on aging and dementia. I also co-lead a committee focused on overseeing health programs in our healthcare system relevant to older Veterans with or at risk for dementia. I have worked with the Alzheimer's Association for several years in these activities. I also perform research in psychotherapy, brain imaging and brain stimulation with Veterans with depression and PTSD. I am also a clinical professor (affiliated) at Stanford in the Dept. of Psychiatry and am part of the Stanford Alzheimer's Disease Research Center.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I co-lead a national group dedicated to ensuring that people living with or at risk for dementia are involved in and informed about innovative clinical therapies and diagnostic tests (the Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia or AGREEDementia.org). My local community involvement has always been informal. As my child went through the Palo Alto Schools I have advocated for the needs of individual students. I care deeply about youth mental health and suicide prevention. I have also advocated for evidence-based decisions around academics and mental health.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I would like to support mental health in our community. I care about the recent efforts around youth suicide prevention. I would like to learn more about how Veterans and older adults integrate with our community as well. Synergy is central to my approach to being part of a team. I would like to learn who we struggle to serve well and how we can better build resources to address those needs.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I am strongly interested in the Jed Foundation suicide prevention program. This is an opportunity to integrate the mental health resources in our community for youth. To the extent we could partner with training programs for mental health professionals we could potentially fill some of these gaps.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?

1. I hope to facilitate a successful partnership with the Jed Foundation to reduce youth suicide

2. I would like to identify ways the city can better support Veterans.

3. I particularly love working with older adults and want to advance their wellbeing. Promoting independence and reducing loneliness is critical

4. I am deeply committed to fostering respect and appreciation across our diverse communities
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
5 Packet Pg. 14 of 541

4. Human Relations Commission Members work with the
documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with these documents is not required for selection.

I have not used these documents. Below is my vita that lists my experience and training.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Rosen_CV_2025_stanford_Neuropsychologist.docx
Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Allyson C. Rosen
Uploaded signature image: allyson rosen signature.jpg
Date Completed 09/18/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
6 Packet Pg. 15 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 12:42pm
Receipt number 65
Related form version 15
Name Bridget Algee
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
7 Packet Pg. 16 of 541

Read the code, and check only ONE option below: I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from the attached Board and Commission Application prior to posting to the City’s website.

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Senior Director, CCASRE Research Institute at Stanford University; CEO of PYTHIA insights & strategy; consulting CMO at 414 California Avenue LLC
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

As a computational human biologist and Senior Director of the CCSRE Research Institute at Stanford University, I lead efforts that foster open dialogue and promote understanding on complex issues around identity and inequality. I work at the intersection of science, technology, and human rights. I use my platforms—teaching, fieldwork, and policy—to expose societal injustices and challenge systems of structural violence that perpetuate marginalization, abuse, and disparities among the most vulnerable communities. I focus on how hierarchies of identity embedded within migration, political, and legal systems generate cycles of discrimination and oppression. As a boots-on-ground practitioner, I provide forensic analysis of unknown remains in the field and expert testimony supporting asylum petitions and stays of deportation in the courtroom, supporting trauma survivors and families of the dead in the US, Latin America, Middle East and SE Asia and motivating policy change.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

In the past two years, I have been an active participant in the Cal Ave Merchant meetings, collaborating with local business owners to support community growth. As the CEO of PYTHIA insights & strategy, I am a member of the Chamber of Commerce, serving also as a patron and volunteer—sponsoring the Athena Awards and offering design and marketing services to promote local initiatives. As a leadership team member for Third Thursday, I designed all graphics, scouted and booked bands, and ran program evaluations, like surveys and focus groups. I am an active member of the California Avenue and surrounding communities, organizing and running a free outdoor music series in my role as CMO at the development company at 414 California Avenue. I’ve also supported city projects like the Cornhole Tournament and youth initiatives such as Young Minds Celebrated. Additionally, I am a member of Leadership Palo Alto. I am passionate about strengthening community connections and local engagement.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am deeply committed to fostering social justice, inclusivity, and community empowerment. With over 20 years of experience in thought leadership, community engagement, and strategic research—both locally and globally—I am passionate about addressing disparities and promoting systemic change. I have a strong history of academic excellence and have served as a boots-on-the-ground leader in community-based and public-facing initiatives. I use my skills to inspire collaboration, influence policy, and implement initiatives that create meaningful social impact. My track record of managing complex projects, securing multimillion-dollar funding, and building strategic partnerships enables me to advance human rights and community resilience effectively. My expertise in data-driven insights, responsible technology, and program development, coupled with my dedication to equitable access and public outreach, enable me to contribute in many areas and Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
8 Packet Pg. 17 of 541

in many ways that expand positive influence.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I deeply thank the Human Relations Commission for its efforts in addressing hate crimes, Islamophobia, and antisemitism in 2024.

Combating hate crimes is deeply important to me due to my longstanding commitment to human rights and my experience in recovering remains in areas of conflict and during humanitarian crises.

Working in forensics, I have witnessed the devastating impact of identity- based violence: hate crimes not only cause physical injuries but also leave lasting scars on communities and families. My work has fueled my passion to advocate for victims and their survivors, ensuring that their stories are heard, and justice is pursued. Committed to fostering inclusive and safe communities, I leverage my experience to combat discrimination, promote understanding, and prevent future violence. As a former Director of DEI, I learned how addressing systemic biases through education, policy, and community engagement we can advance a society where diversity is celebrated and protected.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I would like to prioritize public outreach and educational events that foster true dialogue, such as town halls, rather than only relying on public comments. Unlike comments sections, town halls provide an open forum for community members and commissioners to engage directly, ask questions, share experiences, and work collaboratively to address issues of concern. These dialogues create opportunities for deeper understanding and foster trust, moving beyond one-way communication.

I can contribute by leveraging my expertise in community engagement and education to design and facilitate these town halls, ensuring they are inclusive and encourage open, respectful conversations. I aim to create spaces where diverse voices are given room to be heard, promoting transparency and shared solutions. I can help develop educational materials to support these efforts, further building community understanding and engagement. Let us foster genuine dialogue on meaningful change and social cohesion.

N/A
If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

BALGEE-HEWITTcv.pdf
Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Bridget F.B. Algee-Hewitt
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
9 Packet Pg. 18 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 17 September 2025, 11:55am
Receipt number 59
Related form version 14
Name Deborah Goldeen
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? (Partial Term expiring October 31, 2025)
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Community Group
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
10 Packet Pg. 19 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Community Activist, Housing and Cycling Advocate Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Helped create, organize and run the Human Rights club at Paly in 1980/81. The club was my idea. We had twenty-five students who joined. As far as I know, it was only such club ever to exist at Paly. I have a great deal of experience that is adjacent to the work of the human relations commission, but this is the only experience that is directly related.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

President of the Palo Alto Judo Club parents boosters (1998/99).

Membership chair for Los Altos Hills Horsemen's Association/ producer of yearly horse Play Day/fundraiser - 2007 to 2019, organizer/producer of annual neighborhood association block parties - 2002 to 2022, help organize and produce holiday decorations and events for Cal Ave (chamber of commerce) - Dec '22, '23, '24, Emergency Services Volunteer/recruiting for the ESV program - started May'25. The list is actually a lot longer than this, it's just that it's going to take me a couple of weeks to remember all of it and I was recruited to apply yesterday.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am applying because the Palo Alto Jewish Community asked me to do so. Us Jews born in the diaspora thought we would never have to contend with antisemitism and Jew hate, especially in Palo Alto or the Bay Area ever. Sadly, that is not the case. We need a seat at the table.

In Palo Alto, that table is the HRC.

The affinity groups that I would bring to the table with me are Asians, Indians (East/South Asian), van dwellers/the homeless, and LGBQT.

Since Asian and Indian immigrants have become such a large, local ideographic, I have made it my job to get to know them, know their cultures and what their experiences are living in Palo Alto. I have affinity with the homeless because I was raised in poverty, which included a period of time when we had to dumpster dive for food. I have strong connections to the LGBQT community because my chosen mom is Lesbian and one of my kids is trans.

Also, I have the gift of being able to see the forest for the trees, a quality that is sorely needed.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

The issue that brought the HRC onto my radar was the drama that has ensued after the Oct 7, 2023 terrorist attack in Israel. The HRC played a significant role in negotiating the fallout in our community. I don't remember which meeting in particular was significant, only that I followed the issue when it, or anything related to it, was discussed by the HRC.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I feel the HRC should focus on enabling constructive civil discourse, countering political polarization, the toxic social environment at our high schools - bullying is rampant, addressing the needs of the homeless and Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
11 Packet Pg. 20 of 541

renters..

The organization Braver Angels is my go to for plans and policies to counter polarized politics. What form that would take would depend on contributions and input from the rest of the commission. The high school social environment is probably best addressed by the city/school liaison committee, but it does fit under the HRC umbrella. First step here is to get ideas from the teens. What the HRC can do to address needs of the homeless/van dwellers, I have no idea, but I expect people in those communities do. For renters, what's needed is city ordinances with teeth and publicly funded legal counsel. To get that we need city attorney to be elected not appointed.

I have no experience with any of these documents.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Deborah Goldeen
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/17/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
12 Packet Pg. 21 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 7 February 2025, 4:33pm
Receipt number 45
Related form version 12
Name Jessica Nelson
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? (Partial Term expiring October 31, 2025)
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
13 Packet Pg. 22 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Community Manager, Entrepreneur & Non-Profit Founder Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

CA Realtor License ID:2107508
Member of the Santa Clara Realtor Association Foundation Board of Directors.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I have attended local events that support local business and my teen has served with YCS (Youth Community Service). In my occupation I serve the community by providing assistance to settling expats in navigating the city and finding the support they need to adjust to living in a new city.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am interested in serving on the Palo Alto Human Relations Commission because I am passionate about fostering inclusive communities. With over 10 years of experience as a community manager and realtor, I have built strong relationships across diverse groups and understand the importance of collaboration. As a board member of the Santa Clara Realtor Association Foundation, I am committed to improving community well-being. Through my nonprofit, Pinnacle Coast Global, I have led initiatives focused on empowering vulnerable populations, particularly in housing and social services. My experience in real estate, nonprofit management, and community outreach will allow me to contribute meaningfully to the commission’s mission of building a more inclusive Palo Alto.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

A recent issue that caught my attention was the Commission’s discussion on affordable housing and its impact on vulnerable communities. As someone who works in real estate and manages housing solutions for underserved populations, I am deeply concerned about the lack of affordable housing options for low-income residents in Palo Alto. The increasing housing costs have made it increasingly difficult for families, students, and other vulnerable groups to find stable housing. This issue is of particular interest to me because my work with Pinnacle Coast Global focuses on providing housing solutions for people facing these challenges. I believe the Commission’s efforts to address this issue align with my own mission of promoting equitable access to housing and resources. I am eager to contribute to finding sustainable solutions that ensure all residents can thrive in our community.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
If appointed, I would like to see the Human Relations Commission focus on advancing affordable housing initiatives, promoting inclusivity, and strengthening community outreach programs. One goal would be to create more opportunities for affordable housing that can help support vulnerable groups, including students, families, and low-income individuals. I would also like to see more initiatives that foster cross- cultural dialogue and understanding among Palo Alto’s diverse communities. My background in real estate, nonprofit leadership, and Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
14 Packet Pg. 23 of 541

community engagement would allow me to contribute by advocating for policies that prioritize inclusivity in housing and social services.

Additionally, I would leverage my connections with local organizations to collaborate on projects that address the needs of underserved residents, ensuring that everyone in Palo Alto has access to the resources they need to thrive.

Although I have not yet worked directly with the specific documents listed, my experience in community management and nonprofit leadership has prepared me to quickly understand and engage with similar strategic planning materials. As the founder of Pinnacle Coast Global, a nonprofit in its early stages, I am deeply focused on assessing the needs of vulnerable populations and designing programs to address gaps in housing, social services, and community development. Although my nonprofit is new, I aspire to contribute to policies and initiatives that promote equitable access to resources. Additionally, my work on the Santa Clara Realtor Association Foundation Board has involved reviewing community plans, helping me develop skills to analyze and contribute to community-focused documents. I am eager to expand my knowledge and actively engage with these documents to further the commission’s work.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Jessica Nelon
Link to signature
Date Completed 02/07/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
15 Packet Pg. 24 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 24 September 2025, 9:38am
Receipt number 68
Related form version 15
Name Joshua Lory
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Other: Sridhar Karnam
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
16 Packet Pg. 25 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation CEO, YourOwn Inc.

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

BS Technological Systems Mgmt & Env Studies, Stony Brook Univ (2007-09); AAS Criminal Justice, CCAF (2005-06); ELPP, UC Berkeley (2019).

Certs: VCP4-DCV; VCADT; VCA-DCV (VMware).

Experience (15+ yrs tech leadership):

Co-Fndr/CEO, YourOwn (2023-Pres): Secure fin ID wallet for data ctrl/wealth.

Advsr, AuthLN (2024-Pres): Bitcoin-cybersec guidance.

Sr Dir Blockchain, VMware (2022-23): Blockchain adopt for 200+ custs (trillions txns).

Sr Dir Skyline PM, VMware (2017-22): AI support to 13K custs; Support Hub w/IBM (50% effort red).

Dir SDDC Arch, VMware (2015-17): $50B TAM growth; partner certs (Accenture et al).

Sr Tech Partner Mgr/CTO Amb, VMware (2011-15): $60M sales via alliances.

IT Infra Consult, Accenture (2010-11): IRS POC ($320M cntrct); DLA migration.

Lead IT Spec, Stony Brook (2007-09): Campus infra/team mgmt.

Sec Forces (ICBM), USAF (2002-06): Nuclear asset security.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

As a Palo Alto resident, veteran, parent, and Jew, I prioritize education, tech equity, and sustainability. Parent Volunteer, Ohlone Elementary School Farm (2024-2025): Lead hands-on activities in animal care, gardening, and habitat education for students, promoting environmental stewardship and community bonds. Strategic Advisor, SUNY Syracuse School of Information Studies (2017): Shaped curriculum on data governance and digital literacy. Technology Advisor, Fathomd EdTech (2014-2015): Advised on immersive games for top MBA programs, enhancing leadership training. Advisor, AuthLN (2024-Present): Offer expertise in secure tech for cybersecurity. Host, 48 Hours to Lead Podcast, Product Marketing Alliance (2021-2022): Interviewed execs on ethical innovation. USAF veteran honored in Stony Brook's 40 Under 40 (2024) for tech impact; engage in Palo Alto civic forums on accountable governance and school transparency (2025).

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
As a conservative veteran and business leader, I'm drawn to the HR Commission to champion common-sense policies that uphold personal responsibility, meritocracy, property rights, and community safety while fostering inclusion in Palo Alto. I believe in limited government intervention that empowers individuals through accountability, not mandates—drawing from my military service securing nuclear assets and leading diverse teams at VMware. With 15+ years scaling tech for Fortune 500s and government, including large government contracts and strategic platforms responsible for trillions in transactions, I'd bring strategic expertise in governance and resource allocation. My advisory roles at AuthLN (cybersecurity) and Fathomd (EdTech) honed Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
17 Packet Pg. 26 of 541

collaborative problem-solving, ensuring fair processes that respect rule of law and fiscal prudence.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

The April 2025 proposal for a Fair Chance in Housing ordinance, which seeks to limit landlords' use of criminal history in rental decisions, piques my interest. As a veteran who values second chances and rehabilitation, I support reducing barriers for reformed individuals. However, from a conservative viewpoint emphasizing property rights and neighborhood safety, I advocate full transparency—landlords deserve complete criminal history access to make informed, accountable choices without arbitrary date restrictions. This common-sense balance protects communities while promoting personal responsibility, aligning with my experience in business and the military.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I'd prioritize goals like streamlining CDBG funding for self-reliance programs (e.g., job training) and addressing unhoused RV dwellers through practical, enforcement-balanced solutions that respect taxpayer dollars. Conservatively, focus on root causes like mental health via partnerships, not expansive entitlements. I'd contribute by leveraging my experience scaling expertise to analyze needs assessments efficiently, facilitate private-sector collaborations for cost-effective tech tools, and host listening sessions emphasizing accountability and community input —ensuring fiscally responsible outcomes that build trust.

No direct experience with the Human Services Needs Assessment (2020), Muni Code 9.72, or Community Services Element (2017). Yet, my policy work mirrors these—conducting resource assessments for $50B markets and crafting governance codes for fair, secure access— applying common-sense rigor to public service planning.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Joshua Lory
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/24/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
18 Packet Pg. 27 of 541

Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
19 Packet Pg. 28 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Marketing
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

My education is in technology and marketing. I have spent more than a decade on Capitol Hill during the Bush / Obama administrations working towards bringing transparency to government spending, resulting in the passage of the notable pieces of legislation that then Senator Obama signed, the Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Federal Spending Act (2008). I also have deep experience in change management, helping groups and companies manage and absorb change.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

From 2014 - 2022, my family and I created and ran a company called Sparkiverse. This afterschool and summer camp STEM company brought all kids together - girls, sports kids, techies, etc - to enjoy tech in fun ways. We had a deep belief that tech and gaming should be a social endeavor. We built entire worlds in the teacher version of Minecraft to allow kids to play online but in a room together. I have been very involved in trying to bring mental health to the forefront, having lost my son to suicide 8 years ago. I often plead at School Board meetings for the community to do more - never with blame. Given the last 3 suicides, I decided to create my own group - Action Committee to Save our Youth.

I've brought together 50 people from across our community together to start identifying ways to do more. I've already seen a positive impact.

Personally, I have a trans son and a gay daughter. I do not believe you need to have a queer child to care, but it does help me understand more deeply.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am interested in the position because I feel very strongly that the city can increase its support of at risk communities (LGBTQ+), BIPOC, immigrants, and particularly the youth intersection of those communities as part of our Human Rights Commission. I do believe that all of the other areas (like renter protections, addressing hate crimes, senior issues, and more) are extremely important. But at this time, I feel like we need to put more emphasis on youth as part of the Human Relations Commission to help build what I've been calling the "mental health fabric" for our community. Whether that's events for engagement / awareness or addressing specific issues, I think we could play a strong role in building understanding, empathy, and involvement from our larger community.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I read through many agendas and reports. The Public Health area is where I am the most interested - mental health and at-risk community support. I will assume someone from the committee is part of the Youth mental health task force. I earlier mentioned how important I think it is to weave youth mental health into city activities, etc. But I also think that adult mental health is also a critical issue. A number of recent suicides at the train were adults. In my Action Group, it's clear that there are many adults struggling, or who have children who are struggling. I do not know exactly what can / should be done here. But I believe that the answer is Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
20 Packet Pg. 29 of 541

that more should be done. Other areas of interest are cultural understanding. I went to the cities' first Ramadan and think that cultural understanding is critical. I do not think we do enough to support our LGBTQ+ community. And unhoused / RV communities. The recent sweeps by San Jose were gut wrenching to see. We can do better.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
- Review of existing and proposed mental health initiatives and support for at-risk communities (LGBTQ+)
- Identification of grants, programs, events, etc. that can become part of Palo Alto's yearly programming (Suicide prevention walks, Pride Day / Pride Walks, Concert series to bring communities together,) - I am a community builder and excel at bringing people together to get things done. I think I can help find ways to get input from the community on the above and get people involved so that we build community in the process of creating events and programming. (We can also learn a lot from Magical Bridge.)

I do not but am a quick study.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Mare Lucas
Uploaded signature image: IMG_3343.HEIC
Date Completed 09/22/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
21 Packet Pg. 30 of 541

Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
22 Packet Pg. 31 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Tech Exec, Government and Crisis Consultant
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

BA and MA in American Culture (study of cultural and sociological trends in the US)
Certificate for Women's Studies (one of the first granted at Douglass College, Rutgers University)
Studies at Eagleton Institute, Douglass College (study of women, trends, and policies)
Writings published in the Huffington Post on politics, policy for over a decade.

Writings published in Forest and Trees (a leading Progressive blog) on progressive politics
Head of Gov Affairs and Policy at Hyperloop Transportation Technologies for experience and expertise in transportation and climate policies.

Consultant to Josh Becker, California State Senator, on climate policy.

Overall, working with many women, social causes and climate change organizations over the decades.

Most recently working with refugee rescue and resettlement as Freedom Connect for over 450 LGBTQ+, women and families from Afghanistan.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Since 2021, I have served on the HRC and for the last two years as Vice Chair. Taken leadership with public safety, HSRAP funding of the city's NGOs, and the faith communities on hate speech, hate incidences, and hate crimes.

In response, I and then Commissioner Savage conducted the standing room only in-depth seminar on hate crimes led by the Mayor, the Chief of Police, SCC District Attorney, and the FBI.

In December 2024, the HRC resolution proposed to condemn hate in the city that unanimously passed.

Following, led the HRC interfaith luncheon with leaders from the faith communities with the Mayor and Chief and Assistant Chief of Police to promote communication about hate incidences across the communities.

Then with the support of the Palo Alto Police, SCC District Attorney, and the FBI conducted a workshop on fraud in the communities.

Finally, served repeatedly on the review of the city NGOs across social issues, particularly the unhoused, applying for HSRAP funding.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I looked at my past application (2021) yet now I have a bigger basket of expertise and relationships in working in all aspects of community and public safety, funding of NGOs working with the needy, and even climate from the year I just spent consulting with CA State Senator Josh Becker.

As I said before, I have a life-long commitment to social change having grown up in an ethnically and racially diverse small town outside of New York City -- in the shadow of the race riots of the 1960's watching as neighborhoods in Newark, New Jersey was burned down to the ground.

This was not very different during the Rodney King race riots when I lived in Santa Monica, California where I was closer and heard the gun shots and the sirens.

These life experiences often change people for the good. For me, it Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
23 Packet Pg. 32 of 541

helped me to continue to shape my activism and commitment to change.

I've written, I've lectured, I’ve researched, I've spoken, and continue to have a deep hunger to get things done.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Again, I reviewed my past application, saw how much the HRC, and I have accomplished in the arena of hate crimes. Back then in 2021, it was he issue of hate crimes that was discussed in the February and March meetings that provoked me to get involved with the HRC. At that time, there were disputes among the Commissioners, and perhaps some resolutions because of urgency.

Well, the Commission and I have taken the issue of hate on and done what we could in these troubling times.

We have conducted listening sessions (2023 and 2024) and developed strong relationships and partnerships in the varied communities. I developed fact-based workshops of experts on hate crimes and heard the voices of those affected by hate incidents that fall outside of prosecution 2024 and 2025). Then in response convened the interfaith religious leaders with law enforcement so they could talk informally this year. And I continue to hope and believe that we can heal if we can keep breaking bread and talking.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?

1.Continue to improve the messaging and communication vehicles on specific policies and tactics for the Commission. We need to message broader and wider to reach more people.

2. Develop more community-based 'talking sessions.’ I know that this is a very engaged populace, yet we leave many out of the discussions.

3. Continue to work on hate to keep the dialogue going with further convenings.

4. Continue to work on affordable housing, senior housing and services to the unhoused.

5. Continue to expand community safety to include more financial protection (fraud and Earned Income Tax Credits) and climate issues, specifically wildfires.

Human Services Needs Assessment - I am working with staff and the new consultants on the updates to this.

Muni Code 9.72 - consulted this time to time,
Community Services Element of the Comprehensive Plan - am familiar and have consulted it when needed.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Article on Afghani Refugees.pdf
Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Michelle Kraus
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/21/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
24 Packet Pg. 33 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 20 September 2025, 1:18pm
Receipt number 61
Related form version 15
Name Raizel Rosenberg
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Other: Word of mouth
Personal Information
1 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
25 Packet Pg. 34 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Lead NPI Engineer at Veev by Lennar
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Lead NPI Engineer, Veev by Lennar – Lead engineer/technician team in launching new prefabricated housing models.

Relief Engineer & Educator, World Ocean School (nonprofit) – Served as relief engineer, medical officer, and deckhand/educator.

Technical Program Manager, Tesla – Directed new product introduction (NPI) programs; led launches involving 70+ coordinated parts and managed 200+ change actions across Interiors, Low/High Voltage Distribution, and Electronics systems.

B.S. Mechanical Engineering – Dean’s List; Honors Mechanical Engineering Fraternity Pi Tau Sigma.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

World Ocean School (3 months) – Volunteer relief engineer, medical officer, deckhand/educator; supported STEM education, community values, and first aid/mental health for at-risk youth, new immigrants, and students from 9 countries; fluent in Spanish.

Community Cornerstone Kitchen (3 months) – Weekly service sorting donations, organizing community dinners, leading holiday drive (100+ gifts for families); designed logos for easier distribution and provided English–Spanish translation.

Second Harvest (2 years) – Ongoing volunteer with food distribution and packaging; assisted with donation sorting and community events addressing food insecurity.

SF Parks Alliance (last year) – Hands-on trail maintenance and public space improvements, supporting environmental stewardship and community access to outdoor areas.

ReHomed, NC (college summers) – Assisted with housing rehabilitation and placement for underserved families; supported repairs, logistics, and client outreach for stable housing.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am interested in serving on the HRC to advance conversations around technology safety and its impact on mental health and well-being. I am passionate about partnering with HRC collaborators such as Palo Alto libraries to host community education on technology safety, mental health, and responsible AI use. As a Spanish speaker, I can help fill a gap the Commission has faced, particularly in childcare and “know your rights” sessions. Being of Mexican-American heritage, culturally Jewish and Christian leaning gives me a unique perspective on inclusion and representation. Through service with World Ocean School, Community Cornerstone Kitchen, Second Harvest, SF Parks Alliance, and ReHomed, I have gained insight into the realities of nonprofit partners. In my current profession, I have seen the challenges that will grow as Application Questions
2 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
26 Packet Pg. 35 of 541

affordable housing funds decline. I want to support the Commission as a strong advocate for residents' well being using my technical expertise and varied experience.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Having reviewed the 2025 HRC meetings and agendas, I was particularly interested in the Commission’s recent listening sessions on childcare access and alternative pathways to homeownership for tenants and communities that might otherwise not have access. As with many of the Commission’s listening sessions, it was clear these need to remain ongoing discussions.

In the homeownership session, it was noted that with affordable housing funds set to decline over the next two years, there is an opportunity to partner with the Planning and Transportation Commission on joint education sessions. These could highlight innovative pathways to affordable homeownership and explore how childcare spaces—such as those at Cubberly—can be better integrated into community planning.

I am also especially interested in the RV Dwellers Subcommittee’s work and contributing to expanding safe parking options, which directly supports some of our most vulnerable community members.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
If appointed, I'd love to see the Commission achieve its goal of hosting a City LGBT+ Pride event, building on the new sponsorship process of the Commission and support from the City event staff. Pride is highly valued by our youth and strengthens our community’s commitment to inclusion.

I would also like to host a community education session with the Palo Alto libraries and other stakeholders on technology safety, responsible AI use, and their connection to both mental health and well-being.

Beyond these, I am committed to advancing the Commission’s work on childcare access and alternative paths to homeownership with the PTC.

I'd also contribute to the RV Dwellers Subcommittee’s efforts in expanding safe parking, and strengthening outreach by serving as a Spanish-speaking commissioner where language access is essential.

I would help the Commission achieve these goals through collaborative partnerships and hands-on community engagement using my technical and non-profit experience.

I do not have prior experience working directly with these documents.

However, I have reviewed their purpose and relevance:

Human Services Needs Assessment: A citywide study identifying top community needs—such as affordable housing, childcare, health care, and food security—as well as barriers like cost, language access, and transportation.

Municipal Code 9.72 (Mandatory Response Program): A local law requiring landlords and tenants to participate in mediation for rental housing disputes, with protections against retaliation and required notices of tenant rights. (I am aware one of HRC's key partners is the Palo Alto Mediation Program. As a renter in Palo Alto, I experience firsthand the importance of policies and services that promote housing stability and community well-being.)
Community Services Element of the Comprehensive Plan: A long-range planning framework guiding how the City delivers parks, recreation, libraries, childcare, and human services to ensure equity and access.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and Yes
3 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
27 Packet Pg. 36 of 541

Commissions Handbook.

Signature Name of signatory: Raizel Rosenberg
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/20/2025
4 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
28 Packet Pg. 37 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 10:56pm
Receipt number 66
Related form version 15
Name Rodney Leggett
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Other: Friend
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
29 Packet Pg. 38 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Director of Litigation/Fair Housing Attorney Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Since February 2023, I have been the Director of Litigation at Housing Rights Center, a Fair Housing nonprofit, where I lead a team of attorneys in filing lawsuits against housing providers that discriminate in violation of state and federal Fair Housing laws. From 2021 to 2023 I worked first as a Staff Attorney, then as the Supervising Attorney for that team. From 2019 to 2020, I worked as a Judicial Law Clerk for a federal judge in the District of Nevada, United States District Court.

I received my J.D. from UC Irvine School of Law in 2019 and my Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Howard University in 2011.

During law school, I interned at the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties and the HIV/AIDS Legal Services Project in San Diego. I also served as a Summer Associate at Relman Colfax PLLC, a national civil rights firm that specializes in Fair Housing litigation. I also volunteered for the school's Transgender Legal Name and Gender Change Project.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Since 2023, I have volunteered with Palo Alto Forward to advocate for policies that will make our city more inclusive and more affordable.

From 2022 through 2023, I was appointed and served as a Renters Representative Board Member on the Mid City West Neighborhood Council in Los Angeles. In this role, I voted on recommendations to my city council member on issues involving tenant's rights, increasing housing supply, local transit and transportation, land use, and homelessness.

I worked as an AmeriCorps volunteer from 2015 to 2016, where I implemented a rental assistance program in Chula Vista and Imperial Beach that provided emergency housing vouchers to unhoused and low- income families. This position allowed me to work with a diverse set of the underserved population of San Diego including veterans, undocumented immigrants, and individuals with severe mental illnesses.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
Given my unique professional experiences and academic training, I believe I will be a valuable addition to the Human Relations Commission.

I have dedicated my career to securing the dignity and civil rights of all people.

I am passionate about civil rights generally, and fair housing specifically, because the issue is personal to me. My parents wanted to give my brothers and I opportunities they never had so they worked multiple jobs, saved money, and purchased a home in a neighborhood with good schools and low crime. However, after the 2008 recession we, like many other families, lost the home we cherished so much. I know how hard families work to obtain a foothold in a city like Palo Alto and I know how emotionally and financially devastating it can be to lose that foothold.

This Commission provides an amazing opportunity to help ensure that other families in a similar situation get the advocacy and support needed Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
30 Packet Pg. 39 of 541

to remain in our amazing community.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

During the June 12, 2025 meeting of the Commission, city staff explained the findings of the "2024 Gap Analysis Report", which analyzed the gap between the needs of our city's unhoused population and the quantity and quality of the services addressing those needs. This issue is deeply important to me, as I have dedicated my career to fighting for the housing needs of all people and have worked closely with unhoused and housing insecure populations to get families into safe and stable housing.

This services gap issue is the among the most critical problems that must be solved in order to get our unhoused neighbors into stable housing. And given recent actions at the federal level, including the slashing of federal expenditures for unhoused services, the gutting of key federal agencies, and HUD's abdication of its responsibility to enforce fair housing rights, it is even more important that our city think proactively and creatively in addressing these gaps in service before they widen.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
Given the anticipated decrease in federal funds and services that promote housing stability for unhoused and low-income people, and HUD's refusal to enforce fair housing rights, it is essential that our city's underserved population get connected to the services they need.

To that end, I think that the Commission should take a proactive approach in ensuring that these populations have access to assistance that would allow them to maintain their housing. This would include increasing landlord outreach and tenant education regarding housing voucher and rental assistance discrimination, partnering with local legal service providers and law schools to support and expand clinics that provide free legal services to low income tenants, and making recommendations to city council to strengthen renter protections while increasing housing supply. I have previous experience in each of these projects and could help ensure that our Commission is giving them the support they need to be effective.

I have previously reviewed Comprehensive Plans for cities in the course of litigation.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Rodney Leggett
Uploaded signature image: Signature.PNG
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
31 Packet Pg. 40 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 3 March 2025, 7:27am
Receipt number 54
Related form version 12
Name Salwa Ansari
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for? (Partial Term expiring October 31, 2025)
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Other: Friend/professional contact
Personal Information
1 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
32 Packet Pg. 41 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Account executive / Currency Risk Management Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Education & Training:

University of California, Berkeley – B.A./M.A. in Political Science Professional Experience:

National Account Executive, Corpay – Foreign Exchange & Banking (Current)
Director of Development, Pillars Fund – Strategic Growth, Nonprofit Sector
Senior Account Executive, Extend, Inc. – Tech Sales
Business Owner, Sassygoats – Charitable E-commerce Company Vice President / Foreign Exchange Trader, BNP Paribas – Investment Banking, New York
Volunteer & Nonprofit Involvement:

Pillars Fund – Strategic Growth (Current, Ongoing)
Muslim Advocates – Impact Litigation (Current, As Needed) The Appellate Project – Minority Representation in the Appellate Court System (Current, As Needed)
IMRC (Indian Muslim Relief & Charities) – Supporting Marginalized Communities in India (Past)
Foundation for Sustainable Development (FSD) – NGO Capacity Building in Africa (Past)
Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Volunteer/nonprofits
Pillars Fund– Strategic Growth (Current, Ongoing) - Former employee, increased fundraising 8X. Developed strategic growth plan Muslim Advocates – Impact Litigation (Current, As Needed) - fundraising strategy, mission positioning. Guidance to Board Chair & Executive Director
The Appellate Project – Minority Representation in Appellate Court System (Current, As Needed) - Offer strategic insights to leadership IMRC – Marginalized Communities, India (2021) - Developed ops plan.

Offered leadership roles, remain volunteer
Foundation for Sustainable Development (FSD) – NGO Capacity Building in Africa (2007) - Left Wall Street to learn NGO operations/fundraising. Inspired charitable business (10 years b/f transitioning back to corporate after pandemic)
Engagement w/ Palo Alto City & School (Recent) - learning governance, relationship-building, strategic engagement. Observe
successes/challenges in community involvement with civic leadership.

Impetus for HRC interest
Personal and Job Experience
2 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
33 Packet Pg. 42 of 541

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I've always been committed to impact, reflected in my professional & volunteer experience. While I've worked directly in the impact sector, my skill set and execution-focused mindset align more with the business sector. However, I remain engaged in long-term impact initiatives as a volunteer.

Recently, I've witnessed how community engagement plays a crucial role in addressing issues that affect us all. I've observed my community members navigate existing systems—often w/o strategic or practical approaches. Many well-meaning people engage w/ leadership do so w/ expectations that are emotion-driven. While leadership must ensure all feel heard, change requires practical & strategic collaboration.

My background in business & nonprofit strategy, combined w/ a solutions-oriented mindset, positions me well for HRC. I support thoughtful dialogue & approaches that create real impact for both my community & the broader public.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I have witnessed the community’s reaction to the situation in Gaza and the direct local impact it has had. It was painful to see, but at times, it was also messy and not handled strategically. As a member of a minority population, I believe deeply in representation and thoughtful civic engagement.

I love this city and its people, and my children are being raised here. I believe that effective change requires practical approaches, respect, thoughtful communication, trust in one another’s intentions, and—most importantly—time. While I am not yet fully aware of the extent of the HRC’s role in addressing such issues, I would love the opportunity to be part of the conversation and help drive meaningful progress.

That said, my interests extend beyond this issue. I am eager to contribute to a range of discussions that impact our diverse community and to help create spaces where all voices are heard and considered.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
If appointed to the Human Relations Commission, I would prioritize increasing representation and fostering a sense of community where all voices feel heard and valued. I believe in bringing intelligence and strategic thinking to civic engagement, ensuring that discussions are solution-driven rather than purely reactionary. Encouraging progressive mindsets—ones that embrace diverse perspectives while remaining practical and forward-thinking—is key to making meaningful change.

Above all, I believe in a positive future and the power of collaboration to achieve it. I would also explore opportunities to involve youth in the civic process, as early engagement fosters long-term civic responsibility and leadership. By bridging gaps between different groups and encouraging thoughtful, inclusive dialogue, I hope to contribute to a commission that actively shapes a stronger, more united community.

None
If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Application Questions
3 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
34 Packet Pg. 43 of 541

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Salwa Ansari
Link to signature
Date Completed 03/03/2025
4 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
35 Packet Pg. 44 of 541

Human Relations Commission Application
Submitted on 24 September 2025, 9:09am
Receipt number 67
Related form version 15
Name SRIDHAR KARNAM
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Human Relations Commission?
Community Group
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
36 Packet Pg. 45 of 541

Other: CURRENT HRC COMMISSIONER
Read the code, and check only ONE option below: I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from the attached Board and Commission Application prior to posting to the City’s website.

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Product Management at Salesforce
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I have a strong background in leadership, advocacy, and inclusion, aligning with the HRC’s mission. With an MS in Engineering Management (Santa Clara Univ.) and an MBA in Marketing, I have led diverse teams in security, cloud, and product management at Salesforce, Oracle, and HP.

My expertise in public communication, strategic leadership, and cross- cultural collaboration enables me to drive awareness and fairness. As a Palo Alto resident, I am committed to fostering equity, inclusion, and civil discourse in the community.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Elected HRC commissioner May-June 2024. Participated in interfaith lunch meetings, helped engage first Hindu community leader, and attended listening sessions. Plans to focus on youth mental health with PAUSD and interfaith community building.

Community experience: Fundraised for underprivileged children's education in India (2005-2010), worked with orphanage for high school girls. Volunteered with Aga Khan Foundation (2014-2016) as only Hindu member, organizing fundraising events to bridge communities.

At HP and Salesforce, worked with Women in Security groups promoting diversity. Mentor underrepresented STEM students and provide digital security guidance to nonprofits. Long-time Palo Alto resident committed to fairness, inclusion, and equity.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
Passionate about equity, inclusion, and social justice. Committed to fostering community where everyone has equal opportunities regardless of race, gender, or background.

Experience: Fundraised for underprivileged children's education in India (2005-2010), worked with orphanage for high school girls. Organized events for Aga Khan Foundation (2014-2016), fostering interfaith collaboration. At HP and Salesforce, promoted diversity in cybersecurity through Women in Security groups.

Currently mentor underrepresented STEM students and support local nonprofits with digital security guidance. Long-time Palo Alto resident with diverse experience in advocacy, leadership, and cross-cultural collaboration, ready to contribute meaningfully to HRC's mission.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

The December 2023 listening session on Muslim, Palestinian, and Arab Experiences deeply resonated with me. Listening is the first step to understanding complex social issues and fostering change.

This highlighted challenges faced by marginalized communities during Application Questions
2 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
37 Packet Pg. 46 of 541

discrimination, emphasizing open dialogue and empathy. It reminded me of my Aga Khan Foundation work (2014-2016) as the only Hindu volunteer, organizing events to bridge communities through interfaith collaboration.

Recent months brought rising tensions around Israel-Palestine and local protests, significantly impacting residents' community cohesion. These geopolitical conversations affect our community deeply.

I believe all humanity is one - everyone deserves equal opportunities regardless of race, religion, or ethnicity. The HRC's commitment to amplifying underrepresented voices is crucial. Progress begins with listening, acknowledging experiences, and continuing difficult conversations to build inclusive community.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
After 6 months as HRC commissioner, I've learned through listening sessions and want to focus on three key areas:
**Interfaith Community Building**
Expand interfaith lunch meetings, create quarterly dialogue series addressing shared concerns. Build on my Hindu-Muslim community bridging experience through Aga Khan Foundation.
**Youth Mental Health**
Partner with PAUSD for peer support programs addressing discrimination. Create safe spaces for diverse youth discussing identity challenges. Use my STEM mentoring background.
**Community Healing During Tensions**
Facilitate dialogue on geopolitical issues affecting residents. Develop conflict resolution workshops for differing viewpoints. Focus on shared values rather than divisive politics.

My cross-cultural collaboration, youth mentorship, and advocacy experience positions me to help Palo Alto navigate social dynamics while building community bridges.

As an HRC commissioner, I have been learning about these issues within our community and has had experiences with listening and working on some of these in the last 4-5 months.

I have experience working with anti-discrimination policies, diversity initiatives, and inclusion programs in both professional and volunteer settings. At HP and Salesforce, I helped organize events to promote and hire women in security, addressing gender diversity in tech.

My work with the Aga Khan Foundation involved interfaith collaboration and fundraising for marginalized communities, aligning with the HRC’s mission. Additionally, I have mentored underrepresented students in STEM and supported local nonprofits, giving me insight into equity, access, and policy advocacy.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: SRIDHAR KARNAM
Link to signature
3 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
38 Packet Pg. 47 of 541

Date Completed 09/24/2025
4 of 4
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
39 Packet Pg. 48 of 541

Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
40 Packet Pg. 49 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Realtor with Keller Williams Realty; President/Principal--Brokers By Design, Inc.

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

B.S. Degree from San Jose State University. Former Commissioner for Palo Alto Parks and Recreation. CA Department of Real Estate (DRE) license. Former Director of CA Association of Realtors (CAR) -- served on its arbitration panel and led tribunal hearings. Chaired several committees for the Palo Alto District of Realtors and Southern Alameda County Association of Realtors, including Professional Standards (arbitration and grievance), Legislation, Membership, and Public Relations. Former member of the PRDS Standard Forms and Multiple Listing Service committees. Served two terms as Board Director for the Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce and was a founding director for the Palo Alto Downtown Business Improvement District (BID).

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Currently serves on the Board of the League of Women Voters-Palo Alto.

Past member of the Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Foundation board of directors. Former Executive Board member of the PAUSD PTA Council and Palo Alto High School PTSA. Served on the Board of All Schools Fund and helped the 2 old school foundations merge into Partners in Education. Helped establish Project Safety Net with City, School, Stanford Hospital/affiliates and a coalition of organizations focused on youth suicide prevention, adolescent mental issues, improving access to mental health services, and community education. Served on several non-profit boards including the Palo Alto YMCA and Palo Alto-University Rotary Club.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Human Relations Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
My husband, Dan, and I were very much involved in our community.

When Dan passed away, I took a break from a full-blown community engagement, primarily working with organizations that need my advice and on short projects and community events. Feeding meals to the needy and seniors on Thanksgiving and Christmas is an annual commitment that's dear to my heart. After time away, I'm here to return in a big way. My extensive community experience could help with the goals of the Human Relations commission.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

The political and social environment for the last several years, and more so during the last 2, have taken my attention and I'm sure most of the residents in our engaged community. I will view the archived video meetings held after submitting this application and will share any particular topic that's of interest during the interview process. would like to help foster awareness and understanding of human relations problems by any means necessary, and recommend local legislation or action to the Council to support or oppose such legislation or regulation under the jurisdiction of the Commission.

Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
41 Packet Pg. 50 of 541

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Human Relations Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I would like to help foster awareness and understanding of human relations problems by any means necessary. I shall recommend local legislation or action to the Council to support or oppose such regulation or legislation under the jurisdiction of the Commission. I read the Commission's goals and responsibilities, particularly the Human Relations Commission's 2021 work plan that are ongoing. I would like to contribute and help prioritize some of the projects, old and new.

I am somewhat familiar with the Community Services Element of the Comprehensive Plan, having served on the Parks and Recreation Commission. I will review them as well as the documents listed above. I just need to submit my application before the deadline expires. I will also meet over with some of the old and current HR commissioners that I know at their earliest convenience for their guidance. I tried to read and print the Boards and Commissions Handbook from your website but it was not up. I tried twice. I will try again, I promise :-) If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

No
Signature Name of signatory: Sunny Dykwel
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/24/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment A - HRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
42 Packet Pg. 51 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 5:44pm
Receipt number 95
Related form version 12
Name Anand Tadakamalla
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Community Group
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
43 Packet Pg. 52 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Retired. But a part time tennis/pickleball coach Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Have an MBA, was a global product marketing professional with HP and Director of Marketing with other startup companies.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Was a communications volunteer with American Marketing Association, Silicon Valley Chapter, and PTO Board Communications member, and Parent Coach for Hillview MS and Menlo Atherton tennis. Member of Palo Alto Pickleball club and an active PAPC volunteer for Bay Area Seniors Pickleball Tournaments.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
Want to use my creativity, analytical and people management skills and experience gained over 40 yrs to solve challenging issues and contribute to the community that I belong to.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

There are issues related to tennis, pickleball, and parking that seem to be the challenges before the Commission and I am confident that I can bring balanced views and solutions to these issues based on my tennis and pickleball background, combined with my professional experience.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
I'd like to provide an equitable solution to all parties involved through thorough research, analysis and examination of all POVs and resource availability with the city.

4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience with these documents is not required for selection.

I do not have any specific or direct experience with those documents beyond news reports.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
44 Packet Pg. 53 of 541

Signature Name of signatory: Anand Tadakamalla
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
45 Packet Pg. 54 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 24 September 2025, 9:49pm
Receipt number 99
Related form version 12
Name Bobi Adle
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
City Website
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
46 Packet Pg. 55 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation District Manager
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I have over 20 years of leadership experience managing operations, budgets, compliance, and large teams in the food service and hospitality industry. In my current role as a Regional Manager with Compass Group, I oversee multiple units, ensuring health, safety, and budget standards while supporting staff and union relations. Previously, I managed 10 locations with Bon Appétit at Google, opened new facilities, and developed staff training programs. Earlier in my career, I led well- known restaurants as a General Manager, where I organized community events and built strong, service-focused teams. I also hold project management training and CPR certification
Outside of work, I have a lifelong love of the outdoors and a deep appreciation for public spaces. I want to bring my leadership and organizational skills to the Parks and Recreation Commission to help steward our parks, ensuring they remain safe, accessible, and enjoyable for the entire community.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I have actively supported my community by organizing and hosting local events at the restaurants I managed, including charity fundraisers and corporate-community partnerships. I have volunteered for park clean- ups, community wellness events, and outdoor education programs in the Los Angeles and Bay Area, and have mentored staff to engage with local initiatives. A lifelong lover of the outdoors, I have climbed Mount Everest, Kilimanjaro, and Mount Shasta, which has deepened my appreciation for preserving natural spaces. These experiences inspire me to serve on the Parks and Recreation Commission, helping maintain and enhance public spaces for everyone to enjoy.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am passionate about preserving and enhancing public spaces for the community, and I see serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission as an opportunity to give back in a meaningful way. I have spent over 20 years leading teams, managing operations, and organizing community- focused events, which has given me strong skills in budgeting, compliance, and collaborative problem-solving. Beyond my professional experience, I have volunteered for park clean-ups, community wellness events, and outdoor education programs, and I have a lifelong love of the outdoors, having climbed Mount Everest, Kilimanjaro, and Mount Shasta.

I would bring a combination of leadership, organizational skills, and a deep personal commitment to stewardship and accessibility of our public parks.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I am particularly interested in the recent discussions around the Cubberley Community Center redevelopment and the management of RV encampments in Palo Alto parks. These issues highlight the challenge of balancing community needs, safety, and access to public Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
47 Packet Pg. 56 of 541

spaces. With over 20 years of experience leading operations and community-focused events, I bring skills in organization, compliance, and stakeholder collaboration. My lifelong love of the outdoors and volunteer work in park clean-ups and community wellness programs motivates me to contribute to solutions that enhance safety, accessibility, and enjoyment of Palo Alto’s parks and recreational facilities.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
f appointed, I would like to help ensure Palo Alto’s parks are safe, accessible, and well-maintained for everyone. I would support initiatives that improve facilities, enhance programming, and promote outdoor activity while prioritizing environmental stewardship. I would contribute my experience in operations, team leadership, compliance, and community event planning to help implement these goals efficiently. My lifelong love of the outdoors and volunteer work in park clean-ups and community programs motivate me to advocate for parks that serve all residents. I would work collaboratively with fellow commissioners, city staff, and the community to make these goals practical, actionable, and measurable.

NA
If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Bobi Adle
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/24/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
48 Packet Pg. 57 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 5 September 2025, 5:22pm
Receipt number 85
Related form version 12
Name Brenton Hanlon
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Daily Post
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
49 Packet Pg. 58 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Retired
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

B.S. Biochemistry/microbiology
MBA
Director of R&D, Beckman Instruments
Director of Marketing, Syva (Syntex subsidiary)
CEO, Health Assurance Inc.

CEO, Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics
VP Sales and Marketing, Abaxis Inc.

Chairman & CEO, NeVap Inc.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Chairman, Nevada County United Way
Mentor, Carlmont Highschool Biotechnology Institute (2023 - present)) Volunteer, Gamble Garden (2023 - present)
Volunteer, Half Moon Bay State Park restoration team (2024 - present).

Volunteer, San Jose Rose Garden (2023 - present)
Volunteer, Arizona Cactus Garden, Stanford University (2024 - present) Volunteer, Sequia Union High School District (2023 - present) Volunteer, Cystic Fibrosis Research Institute (2023 - present) Volunteer tutor, 4th grade Costaño School (2025 - present Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am a volunteer at Half Monn Bay State Park, removing invasive species and restoring native species. Now that I'm retired and have some free time, I thought my extensive experience with planning, resource management, business management and budgeting may be useful to the Parks and Recreation Commission

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I don't have any specific interest beyond helping with the preservation of parks and open spaces, planning and budgeting.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
Preservation/restoration of open spaces, efficient resource management, good long and short-term planning, and responsive to community members.

Not experienced with these specific documents, but familiar with the processes involved with creating strategic plans, business plans and budgets. And of course Board meetings.

Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
50 Packet Pg. 59 of 541

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Brenton Hanlon
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/05/2024
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
51 Packet Pg. 60 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 10 September 2025, 4:20pm
Receipt number 87
Related form version 12
Name Drew Pearson
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 4
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
52 Packet Pg. 61 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Product Manager
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Education
B.S. in Applied Mathematics (minor in Economics)
M.B.A. from University of Virginia (Darden)
M.S. in Data Science from University of Virginia
Work Experience
3 years as a data scientist at Ancestry.com
3 years at Zillow Group as a product manager
5 years teaching tennis (high school and college)
There are many tangible and applicable skills from my education and career experience that will prove valuable as a commissioner. As my experience at Ancestry and my education background show, I am very data proficient and have plenty of experience leveraging data to make decisions. For example, I was able to cut the cost of new customers for Ancestry via a primary channel by 15%. Beyond data acumen, my MBA proves I have a strong general financial and business literacy. Lastly, my time at Zillow shows I know how to lead. As a Senior manager at Zillow, I have a team of 5 product managers and work with them and many stakeholders to build impactful products at Zillow.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I am an active member of my Church -- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.

One of my volunteer efforts in the Church is to teach a morning scripture study class to high school aged students. My co-teacher and I teach 10- 14 students attending PALY and GUNN Monday - Thursday. Beyond that, I participate in regular service through our Church organization such as providing food for families with newborns, helping people move in/out, partnering with habitat for humanity to build housing, and more.

I have also volunteered as a coach for youth football and soccer teams.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I love Palo Alto parks and the programs that the Parks and Rec commission provide. I was born and raised in old Palo Alto. Parks, middle school sports programs, etc. were my childhood. I did it all:
friendly whiffle ball at Hoover park, tennis at Rinconada, hundreds of rounds of golf at Baylands. Now, I have the blessing to introduce my daughter to the parks. This past summer my oldest daughter and I visited all but 7 of the Palo Alto Parks and Open spaces. The memories we made picnicking, swinging, sliding, etc. are cherished. I know those on the Parks & Rec commission and city council, etc. made it possible for me to have these great memories, I want to pay it back and make sure others can have the same opportunities.

My personal experience brings the desire, interest, and passion then my Application Questions
2 of 4
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
53 Packet Pg. 62 of 541

vocational experience of analyzing data, aligning stakeholders, and making decisions will help us as a commission continue to provide an excellent service to all Palo Alto residents and others.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

A couple of issues are of particular interest.

1. Cubberley. The energy from all the different extracurriculars going on there is exciting. I play tennis there regularly and it is so fun to see all the different activities. Hearing the softball chants and dance class music, then seeing the language classes, it’s evident that this is an incredible resource. I look forward to the opportunity to dig in here more and find a lasting solution that benefits all.

2. I love tennis AND pickleball. I played tennis on PALY's team and on the club team at BYU, and recently in a few pickleball tournaments. One reason people live in the Bay Area is to play outdoor sports year round. I want to help with a solution that

3. Middle School Athletics --> I was lucky enough to enjoy flag football, basketball, and tennis at Jordan (now Greene). I want to help dive into this problem to find the best solution so that all can have a great middle school sports experience.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
As for specific goals to specific problems the commission is facing right now, I don't feel currently adequate to prescribe a solution or goal, because it wouldn't be fair until I have done the appropriate level of due diligence.

Please don't mistake that answer as an inability to take action nor as a lack of interest. It’s because I have extreme interest, that I want to make sure I only prescribe goals and solutions that I feel confident are right, which requires a deep level of research and thought.

One general goal, however, that I will bring with me to the commission is:
“we inspire action”. We have the unique opportunity to inspire positive change. At work I have honed the skill to ask the right question to identify the root cause of the problem or the root concern causing a lack of action. I will bring this skill to the commission and by doing this, I can help us quickly and efficiently identify solutions to the crux of the issue and ultimately effect positive change.

No experience with these specific documents.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Drew Pearson
3 of 4
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
54 Packet Pg. 63 of 541

Link to signature
Date Completed 09/10/2025
4 of 4
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
55 Packet Pg. 64 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 24 September 2025, 1:56pm
Receipt number 98
Related form version 12
Name Hurjane Vongsachang
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Email from the City
Palo Alto Weekly
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
56 Packet Pg. 65 of 541

City Website
Other: In person commission meeting
Read the code, and check only ONE option below: I request that the City of Palo Alto redact my home address, phone numbers, and email address from the attached Board and Commission Application prior to posting to the City’s website.

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Project Specialist/Project Manager
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I bring experience in both professional program management and volunteer leadership. At Stanford School of Medicine, I manage quality improvement and physician wellness initiatives, leading projects that strengthen community engagement and build consensus among diverse stakeholders. Beyond my role, I have volunteered in wellness leadership for many years—serving as a BeWell Ambassador in 2016–2018, and currently serving on the Neurosurgery Wellness Committee (2024– present) to promote wellbeing and connection among employees. I have over a decade of event and program coordination experience, including wellness challenges and social activities that encourage active, healthy lifestyles.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I have a long-standing commitment to community service and civic engagement. During high school, I served four years as a Youth Commissioner in the City of San Marcos, providing input on youth initiatives and assisting with community events year-round. From 2007– 2012, I co-founded and co-led a youth orchestra for underprivileged children, dedicating weekly time to teaching and mentoring. I was also an active member of Key Club, further expanding my volunteer contributions through local service projects. More recently, I have continued fostering community connection by organizing recreational tennis teams and wellness challenges that engage residents in active, healthy lifestyles. These roles reflect my dedication to leadership, service, and creating inclusive opportunities.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission because I want to be more actively involved in shaping the next generation of Palo Alto as I start my own family. I am a strong advocate for youth programs, inclusivity, fairness, and equality, and I value using facts and data to guide decision-making. My professional experience in program management, wellness, and community engagement, combined with my volunteer leadership in recreational and youth initiatives, equips me to provide informed, practical guidance. I hope to contribute to policies and programs that foster accessible, safe, and engaging parks and recreational opportunities for all residents.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

A recent issue that particularly resonated with me was the proposal to convert tennis courts at Mitchell Park into pickleball courts. This proposal sparked significant community debate, highlighting the challenges of balancing the needs and interests of different recreational groups.

Concerns were raised about the adequacy of parking, the prioritization of non-residents, and the impact on tennis players who rely on these facilities.

Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
57 Packet Pg. 66 of 541

This situation underscored the importance of active listening and collaborative problem-solving in addressing community concerns. I am eager to engage in such discussions, ensuring that all voices are heard and that decisions are made equitably and thoughtfully. My goal is to contribute to solutions that respect diverse perspectives and foster a sense of community.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
If appointed, I would like to help the Commission advance goals that make parks and recreation accessible, inclusive, and engaging for all residents. Specifically, I hope to support initiatives that expand youth and family programs, promote wellness and physical activity, and ensure equitable use of recreational facilities. I would contribute by actively listening to community input, analyzing data to inform decisions, and collaborating with other Commissioners and staff to develop solutions that balance diverse needs. I am particularly interested in helping to foster programs that build community connection, encourage participation across age groups, and ensure that public spaces are safe, well-maintained, and welcoming to everyone.

While I have not directly worked with these specific planning documents, I have extensive experience reviewing and analyzing policy, program, and planning reports to guide decision-making. In my professional and volunteer roles, I regularly use data and evidence to inform strategies, evaluate outcomes, and make recommendations. I have also collaborated on community-based recreational programs, youth initiatives, and wellness projects, which required reviewing guidelines, coordinating with stakeholders, and ensuring equitable access. This background has prepared me to thoughtfully engage with planning documents, provide informed recommendations, and contribute to discussions on policies, capital projects, and community priorities for parks and recreation.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Hurjane Vongsachang
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/24/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
58 Packet Pg. 67 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 3:55pm
Receipt number 94
Related form version 12
Name Marc Schoenen
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
59 Packet Pg. 68 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Human Resources Executive
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I have a bachelor of arts from Franklin & Marshall college, and a MBA from Harvard Business School. I currently work in Human Resources at Rivian, and have worked in HR-related fields for multinational companies for 15+ years. Much of my work experience includes the employee value proposition to attract and retain talent, which often extends beyond traditional rewards mechanisms to create engagement and community amongst employees and prospective candidates.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I have applied for Palo Alto commissions in previous years (both Parks & Rec and the Human Relations commissions). I volunteer with the Palo Alto Children's Theater (Friends of Palo Alto Children's Theater), for local Type 1 Diabetes related organizations, with ParkRun, (formerly Byxbee, now Baylands) have organized Blood drives, and have volunteered time and resources into various medical studies. Extending beyond a few years, I have also been a little league coach, have volunteered at our neighborhood's swimming association, etc.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
We moved to Palo Alto 15 years ago; we have seen greatness across our community: The creation of Magical Bridge playground, the reopening of Mitchell Park Library with Ada’s Cafe; there is much reason for optimism. After a gorgeous Summer filled with the Chili Cook-Off, concerts and movies in our parks, how can one not be excited about Palo Alto’s myriad recreational opportunities!
We are involved in local theater, sports, and frequent many small businesses that help Palo Alto thrive. In my day job, I work in Human Resources (experience with both start-ups and more established companies. My experience helps me understand challenges in optimizing resources and promoting fairness, inclusion and equity across populations. I frequently participate in ParkRun - a volunteer-led weekly gathering over in Byxbee Park and has temporarily relocated to the BayLands as the sewer pipe rehabilitation project continues.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

One recent hot topic has concerned pickleball courts and parking near Mitchell Park. I am particularly interested in this topic, not becuase I am a pickleball player, but because I am a local resident who lives within walking distance of Mitchell Park, where we frequently utilize the resources and services, whether the library, having a coffee or pastry supporting Ada's Cafe, or socializing our dig at the recently renovated Dog Park near the corner of Mitchelle Park. Clearly this topic has garnered significant public comment (As evidenced by frequent public comments with this Commission). How lucky we are as a city to have such passionate citizens, and amazing resources to offer best-in-class services in the library, park and courts that are attractive to consituents, young and old, with a wide range of views.

Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
60 Packet Pg. 69 of 541

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
Two areas I’m most passionate about are Bicycle / E-bike policy and access and accessibility options for Palo Alto’s senior population. On the former, I would help ensure there is a holistic and understood view on which areas bikes can access, and how they are inclusive and safe for bikers and other travelers alike. As e-bikes are more prevalent throughout our community, it is important that a balance is made to ensure access, while ensuring the safety and access of others who may want to enjoy the same trails, etc. as e-bikers. On the latter, it is important to understand the shifting demographics of Palo Alto. >20% of Palo Alto residents are 65+, with the median age now well into the 40s.

We must consider these demographics in Palo Alto's long-term strategic plan, I would help drive accountability among our city and commission to being mindful of these considerations in our city's planning initiatives, and would volunteer to lead community outreach and comment on this topic.

No specific relevant experience. I did attend/listen in to public comment periods on both the bicycle transportation plan (2012) and the Parks & Rec Master Plan (2017). As someone who commutes to work by bike, I remain vigilant in endorsing the city's enthusiasm for bike safe zones for people of all ages to safely travel via bike around the city.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Marc Schoenen
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2005
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
61 Packet Pg. 70 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 11:16pm
Receipt number 97
Related form version 12
Name Michelle Ma
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Community Group
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
62 Packet Pg. 71 of 541

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I graduated from Hunan Traditional Chinese Medicine University in 1986 after moving to the U.S., I have worked in many fields, universities, banks, ……. I can send more details later
Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

I volunteered at local schools and Gamble garden. I can provide more details later
Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
Why I’m Interested & What I’ll Bring
I’m interested because I’ve called City Plato home for 20+ years—I love our parks and want to make sure they serve all locals well, especially amid current court-use talks.

My experience? As a Traditional Chinese Medicine grad, I listen and find balance; my past work/volunteering at local schools, banks, and libraries taught me to understand neighbors’ needs and communicate clearly.

Plus, being retired lets me give full time to the role.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

For the park facing discussions about court use, I see this as a chance to listen first: to hear what neighbors need, make sure local voices guide decisions, and keep our park a space that brings us together. This opening on the Commission feels like the perfect way to turn that care into action—for our park, and for every resident who loves it as much as I do.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
If appointed, my focus would be on keeping the process local, inclusive, and solution-driven—rooted in what our community needs.

First, I’d prioritize listening: I’d reach out to residents who use the park regularly (tennis players, pickleball fans, families) to gather their thoughts, not just at meetings but also through quick surveys or casual check-ins. This ensures every local voice is heard, not just a few.

Then, I’d work with the Commission to explore balanced options—like whether we can optimize existing space without cutting access to one sport, or set fair rules for outsider use to reserve time for locals.

Finally, I’d keep the process transparent: sharing what we learn and the choices we’re considering, so everyone feels confident the decision serves our park and our community.

4. Parks and Recreation Commission Members work with the documents listed below. If you have experience with any of these documents, please describe that experience. Experience I have not had a chance to work with these documents
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
63 Packet Pg. 72 of 541

with these documents is not required for selection.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Michelle Ma
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
64 Packet Pg. 73 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 23 August 2025, 11:42am
Receipt number 83
Related form version 11
Name Nellis L. Freeman, Jr.

Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
Yes
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
65 Packet Pg. 74 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Retired - IT Management
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

MBA with an emphasis in Computer Science. Project Management Consulting.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Currently Chair of the Palo Alto Parks and Recreation Commission with an extended term expiring on 11/1/2025.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
As Chair and a dedicated member of the Parks and Recreation Commission, I would like to formally express my interest in continuing my service. We still have important work ahead in advancing the goals outlined in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. I remain committed to working closely with city staff, my fellow commissioners, and our community partners to ensure we make continued progress on these initiatives and deliver meaningful outcomes for Palo Alto residents.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

One issue of particular interest is the future of the Cubberley Community Center. I’ve been actively engaged in efforts to balance the recreational needs of multiple user groups—particularly the growing Pickleball community and the established tennis community. Ensuring equitable access while minimizing conflict remains a work in progress. I’m also closely following the synthetic turf field study. The opportunity to extend field use, reduce downtime, and ensure player safety through practices such as GMAX testing and improved maintenance protocols is important.

Both topics reflect the Commission’s role in advancing the Parks and Recreation Master Plan through thoughtful, inclusive, and data-driven decision-making.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
If reappointed, I would like the Commission to continue its strong partnership with the Community Services Department, working as a team with shared values to advance the goals outlined in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. With ongoing changes in both the Commission and CSD leadership, it's essential to maintain continuity and focus. Key priorities include supporting the next phases of the Cubberley project, strengthening equitable access to recreational resources, and completing important work already underway. I will continue to contribute through collaboration, institutional knowledge, and a commitment to community engagement.

As a current member and Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission, I am very familiar with all of the listed documents. I consistently reference the Parks, Trails, Natural Open Spaces, & Recreation Master Plan (2017) in Commission discussions and decision- making. The Concordia Master Plan (2019) has been especially relevant as the Cubberley project progresses, and I’ve engaged deeply with its Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
66 Packet Pg. 75 of 541

recommendations. I’ve also drawn on the Comprehensive Plan, Youth Master Plan, Baylands Master Plan, and Bicycle–Pedestrian Transportation Plan in various initiatives, including field use, recreation access, and intergenerational programming. These documents serve as essential guides for aligning our work with the City’s long-term vision.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Nellis L. Freeman, Jr.

Uploaded signature image: MySignature1.bmp
Date Completed 08/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
67 Packet Pg. 76 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 3:48pm
Receipt number 93
Related form version 12
Name Roger V. Smith
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
Yes
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
City Website
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
68 Packet Pg. 77 of 541

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

BS (1964), University of Colorado
MBA (1969), Santa Clara University
Founding President and CEO, Silicon Valley Bank
Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

Founding Director, The Friends of Palo Alto Parks
Founding Director, Mothers Against Murder
Founding Director, Palo Alto Police Foundation
Emeritus Director, Palo Alto Community Foundation
Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I have worked closely with Palo Alto Park & Recreation Commission for the last 14 years.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

New Bathrooms at the Magical Bridge that is badly needed due to increasing influx of visitor.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
Work closely with the community and raise money for public-private projects.

I worked closely with the management of the parks.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
69 Packet Pg. 78 of 541

Signature Name of signatory: Roger V Smith
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
70 Packet Pg. 79 of 541

Parks & Recreation Commission Application
Submitted on 21 September 2024, 9:10pm
Receipt number 74
Related form version 10
Name Vadim Axelrod
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
Yes
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
Yes
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Parks and
Recreation Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
71 Packet Pg. 80 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Startup founder
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Youth sports coach (soccer, softball), AYSO certified
Parks & Rec Commission, city of Rye Brook, NY (3 years) Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations, including dates and any offices held.

San Carlos Economic Development Advisory Commission (2 years) PluggedIn volunteer (tech training for disadvantaged youth) Stanford Peninsula Alumni Board (10 years)
Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Parks & Recreation Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I love the green spaces in Palo Alto and use them frequently, seeing the various activities there:
* Youth sports (organized and pickup)
* Adult sports (I'm active in Ultimate Frisbee)
* Children's playgrounds (3 kids)
* Dog use (I have a 7-year-old cockapoo)
* Bicycling (I ride most everywhere with kids)
* Nature exploration (avid hiker and birdwatcher)
I served on Parks & Rec in Rye Brook, NY and affected projects such as playground renewals, pickleball court introductions, DFIB installations and maintenance improvements.

I'd love to bring my experience from Parks & Rec, personal involvement and knowledge of Palo Alto having first moved here in 1991 to the city!

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Grass vs Artificial Turf mandates. I feel that there is need for both but the balance should be in favor of grass given the California climate and environmental impacts of turf.

3. If appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Parks and Recreation Commission achieve, and how would
you help in the process?
I believe that Palo Alto has some excellent facilities and want to make sure there is safe and convenient access to them for pedestrians and bicycles (path and signage improvements, safe crossing, bike parking, etc.).

In the past, I've read portions of the Bicycle Pedestrian Plan and the Cubberley Report.

Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
72 Packet Pg. 81 of 541

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Vadim Axelrod
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/21/2024
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment B - PRC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
73 Packet Pg. 82 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 2:33pm
Receipt number 36
Related form version 10
Name Anjana Joshi
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
74 Packet Pg. 83 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation I am an educator, a community college teacher in Arts and Design since 1995. In the last 30 years, I have taught at the Broome Community College (Binghamton, NY), Academy of Art (SF), Canada College (Redwood City) and Chabot College (Hayward). I have exhibited my furniture and paintings. I work in the medium of oil painting.

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I have an MFA (1993) and I have taught Interior Design at Canada College in Redwood City since 1998. I also teach at Chabot College in Hayward since 2020. I am faculty co-advisor for the Interior Design Club at Canada College. I teach the following courses: California Architecture and Urban Design, History of Interiors, Materials, Critical Thinking, Perspective Drawing, and Principles and Elements of Design. I am certified by the National Council for Interior Design Qualification.

I continue my arts education by visiting museums and monuments around the world and through online educational programming.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

I am a Board Member at the HOA for my condo complex. When my children were students in PAUSD I was a dedicated volunteer for classroom and school activities, local and overnight trips. At Palo Alto High School I volunteered in the College and Career Center for many years. I volunteer to visit local High Schools and educate them regarding career training at Canada College.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I want to get involved in local arts initiatives because increasingly I feel that for the young and the old, public art and urban design can provide a refuge from the harsh realities that exist. I have 30 years of experience teaching young adults who are actively involved in building towards their future. Increasingly, to some, this future appears stressful and uncertain.

I see the role of public arts as encouraging cultural experiences and growth that could serve as a buffer against these conditions of uncertainty and stress and create conditions for a pulsing life and rhythm such as we find in the great old cities of the world, where participation for all exists through opportunities to interact and grow together in neighborhoods and cultural events. If selected, I would bring my sensitivity to the use of arts not only for visual appeal but also for a shared experience that creates urban comfort.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I cannot mention any one issue in particular, but having lived near California Avenue Business District for the last 23 years I have followed many issues that were important to the residents. I am interested in all efforts that occur as a side effect of the process by which people make a place their own.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
If I am appointed I would like to see young adults asked more about what public art they would like to see in their town. This step is not absent at this time, but I think it can be made a central theme. What would make them feel part of the city's fabric? What kind of art would make them feel heard? My reason for this approach would be to have public arts act as a catalyst for change because I believe that public arts Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
75 Packet Pg. 84 of 541

and urban design have the capacity to replace apathy with empathy, and distance with welcome. The feedback of this particular age group could then be intentionally executed within the larger existing framework that aligns with existing citywide practices.

4. Public Art Commission Members work with the document listed below. If you have experience with this document, please describe that experience. Experience with this document is not required for selection.

I have read this document.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Anjana Joshi
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
76 Packet Pg. 85 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 11:51am
Receipt number 35
Related form version 10
Name Anne-Sophie Gaudet
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? No
Address
City Redwood City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
77 Packet Pg. 86 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation I am a professional artist. I specialized as a muralist but I also practice oil painting.

Here is my website: annesophiegaudet.com
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I have been a visual art teacher at Silicon Valley International school in Palo Alto for 7 years. Since June 2023 I am a full time artist. I painted a dozen of murals in California. I painted one of the utility box in Palo Alto in July 2024. I also made a large scale mural at the Midpen Media Center in Palo Alto in 2025.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

When I was a teacher, I was involved in a lot of community activities at the school. One of the big events I planned each year was the "Arts Night" where the entire school was turned into an art gallery. Since I am a full time artist I look to bring art to different communities. I made a large scale public art mural for the city of Tustin. I regularly take part into a group of artists in Mountain View, we meet the first Wednesday of each month at Black Rock Coffee to plan activities. I painted live in a music festival "Destination" in September. I will participate into a mural contest at a festival "Mural Madness" in San Mateo on Sunday.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am very interested in serving on the Public Art Commission because I love both Arts and the city. I lived in Palo Alto for 6 years when I arrived to the US from France in 2009. The city was very welcoming to my family and I would like to make the city even more beautiful, interesting and welcoming to all with more art. I would bring my general knowledge of Design and Visual Art, my own sensitivity and reflection regarding the enhancement of a place with art.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I would like to better understand how budgets work, how partnerships can be built between stakeholders and artists. I believe local artists have a lot to bring but don't have a lot of paid opportunities to get involved.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I would like to help the city of Palo Alto develop an identity as a city that highly value the arts. I would help by identify places or events that lack art.

I don't have experience with this document.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
78 Packet Pg. 87 of 541

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Anne-Sophie Gaudet
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
79 Packet Pg. 88 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 18 September 2025, 4:27pm
Receipt number 31
Related form version 10
Name Citlali Muñoz
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Flyer
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
80 Packet Pg. 89 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Currently unemployed. I will be starting an after school program teacher position later this month, Sept. 29th.

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

BA in graphic design and minor in advertising from SJSU.

AA in studio arts and communication from Foothill College.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

I attend a handful of community events and have helped create an annual breast cancer fundraiser with my mom and other neighbors.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I'm interested in serving on the Public Art Commission because I value art and believe we need art in every form to express ourselves but also bring communities together. I would bring a different perspective to the table of inclusion and diversity. We all love where we live, and providing art beautiful art pieces to look at and experience together would make living here much better.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Bringing art to the downtown parking garage seems to be a great idea to me. Bringing art throughout the city, especially in areas that are often overlooked seems to be a good choice because we want to remind the city, the residents that this is a beautiful place to live, and all areas and corners of the city should be nice to look at.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
One thing I would love to see is enhancing cultural identity. As we know it, the Peninsula is a melting pot of all kinds of backgrounds and brining that to life in our own city would really show how much we love and value our residents. People would love to see themselves through art, and others would love to learn and experience different cultures through the art as well.

I have seen documents like this before and am familiar but have not worked with a document like this myself.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

CitlaliMunoz_Resume2025.pdf
Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Citlali Muñoz
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
81 Packet Pg. 90 of 541

Link to signature
Date Completed 09/18/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
82 Packet Pg. 91 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 11 September 2025, 2:54pm
Receipt number 28
Related form version 9
Name Claude Ezran
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
83 Packet Pg. 92 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Retired high-tech marketing executive, 30+ years of experience in Silicon Valley companies such as Intel, 3Com, Xerox, Adobe, and start-ups, mostly at the Director and VP level.

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.
• MBA, Harvard Business School.
• MSEE, Ecole Superieure d'Electricite (France)
• BS. Advanced mathematics and physics
Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.
• Jury chair for UNAFF (United Nations Association Film Festival): 2021- Present
• Human Relations Commission, including Vice-chair and Chair: 2008- 2014
• Founder and Organizer of Palo Alto World Music Day: 2009-2019 • Member of the Board of Directors, Palo Alto Recreation Foundation (PARF): 2010 2020
• Graduate of the Palo Alto Citizen Police Academy: 2019 • Member of the Community Advisory Group to the Police Chief: 2010- 2012
• Member of Steering Committee for Measure A (school parcel tax): 2005 • Treasurer of the Palo Alto PTA Council: 2004-2007.
• Member of the Board of Directors, Cable Co-op: 1992-1998.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I have extensive experience in the arts, and I will bring a different and broad perspective:
• Took art classes at The Louvre Museum
• Visited art museums in about 80 countries and in many U.S. cities • Most extraordinary museum ever visited: Savitsky Museum in Nukus, Uzbekistan. World-class avant-garde soviet art
• Attended the huge Art Basel Miami show in 2019
• Attended several big local exhibitions of Bay Area artists, • Participated in Burning Man 2017, 2018, 2019, 2022, 2023, and 2025.

One of the key attractions of Burning Man, at least for me, is seeing the incredibly creative pieces of art, some of which end-up as public art (San Jose, San Francisco, Reno, and Palo Alto are examples of cities that have displayed Burning Man art)
• Took ceramics classes at the Art Center and Paly
• I collaborated with many artists when I was organizing Palo Alto World Music Day
• I am one of the jury chairs of UNAFF (United Nations Association Film Festival)

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Artist‐in‐Residence temporary artwork for King Plaza. King Plaza is for obvious reasons the most important location in Palo Alto. I would like to see big, impressive, and creative works of art displayed there. Ideally these artworks would be talked about in the press and people would want to come and see it and would tell their friends about it!

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to Public art in Palo Alto tends to be bland and unremarkable. It is barely Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
84 Packet Pg. 93 of 541

see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
noticeable, not memorable, and does not trigger conversations. I would like to help bring more of a wow factor, more of a sense of wonder, more creativity to Palo Alto. Let us make Palo Alto more of a destination, not just for its restaurants but also for its art, a bit like what I accomplished with World Music Day. I would also love, for instance, to explore the opportunity of hosting again some of the highly creative and stunning art pieces from Burning Man artists.

I would collaborate with my fellow commissioners to make Palo Alto more of an art destination.

I saw it when I applied last year and looked at it again this year. I will spend more time on it if I am selected.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Claude Ezran
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/11/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
85 Packet Pg. 94 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 22 September 2025, 1:07am
Receipt number 32
Related form version 10
Name Donny Foley
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? No
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Other: Elise DeMarzo
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
86 Packet Pg. 95 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Education & Exhibition Director at Pacific Art League of Palo Alto Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.
7 Years as Pacific Art League of Palo Alto’s Gallery Director. 7 Years as Kaleid Gallery’s Gallery Manager in San Jose. 6 Years running a free, comprehensive artist resource website.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

I’ve been actively engaged with the community for nearly 15 years through both solo and group exhibitions. My work extends beyond galley work as well: I served on the artist selection panel for ArtLift Grants:

Utility Box Edition (2024) and was a juror for the Color Pencil Society of America (San Jose Chapter) Annual Exhibition (2023).

In 2015, I co-founded My Art Resources, a comprehensive online hub designed to support artists across Santa Clara County and surrounding areas. For six years, we provided free, accessible information on local artists, art venues, events, education, and opportunities—all in one convenient place.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I have a genuine commitment to helping artists achieve their goals.

Serving on the PAC allows me to gain a deeper understanding of the art world, while also working to make it more accessible to artists who may not have envisioned their work reaching such a scale.

As a gallery manager, I bring a unique combination of artistic, community, and organizational experience to the Public Arts Council. My work has given me direct insight into supporting artists, from guiding them through exhibitions to helping them connect with new audiences.

I’ve managed the logistics of curating shows, coordinated achievable timelines, and built partnerships that strengthen community engagement.

This perspective allows me to understand both the creative and practical sides of presenting art, and to advocate for making the arts more accessible and impactful on a public scale.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Last year, a mural by artist Nigel Sussman was planned for the Pacific Art League but was prevented from moving forward due to a nuisance lawsuit. Recently, I learned that a new bill is in progress that would allow this artist and future muralists to move forward despite such challenges.

While I cannot say how much the PAC directly influenced this outcome, it demonstrates the trust and confidence city leaders place in the PAC.

By standing firm and finding creative solutions, the council showed resilience and leadership. I want to work with a team that inspires through action and never backs down from supporting the arts.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I would like to bring more visibility to projects and calls for artists while strengthening connections with the local artist community. Through my work at the Pacific Art League—a space that functions as both a school and gallery—I’m in a unique position to engage with emerging and professional artists every day. From classrooms to exhibitions, I’m Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
87 Packet Pg. 96 of 541

constantly in conversation with creators, and being able to share opportunities with them is one of the most meaningful parts of what I do.

I don't have any experience with Midpen Media Center specifically. I do, however, have a lot of web design experience. Learning to navigate and use it would likely be something I'd be very comfortable doing.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Donny Foley
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/21/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
88 Packet Pg. 97 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 16 September 2025, 10:29am
Receipt number 29
Related form version 9
Name Eedit Bareket
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Palo Alto Weekly
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
89 Packet Pg. 98 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Realtor at Compass Palo Alto
Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I grew up in an artistic environment with artist parents, received a Master’s degree in Art History, worked as a stylist on advertising and editorial photo shoots and have been a life long volunteer and active observer of art. Having lived and worked with artists and then arranging art exhibits and art sales, seminars and workshops has given me a 360 view of the artistic process. I have lived in 3 countries and several cities but Palo Alto has been home for 20+ years and I am firmly entrenched in the community.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

Numerous volunteering projects at Ohlone, both middle schools and PALY. The PA art center, Cantor. The Oshman JCC, Family Jewish Services. Food Pantries throughout the Bay Area, Kiva, and my own contributions of time, money and venues.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I want to contribute my time and energy to the city in a manner that suits my abilities and sensibilities and years of experience in art related areas.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

None

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
A more transparent, inclusive and youthful approach to bringing art to the community with new voices and new ideas.

None
If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Eedit Bareket
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
90 Packet Pg. 99 of 541

Link to signature
Date Completed 09/16/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
91 Packet Pg. 100 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 24 September 2025, 12:44pm
Receipt number 37
Related form version 10
Name Liz Mann
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Daily Post
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
92 Packet Pg. 101 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Retired special ed teacher, PAUSD.

Art education degree from NIU
Member of deYoung/Legion of Honor for 30 years.

President of CSES chapter 301
Docent at Gamble Garden.

Traveled around the world view indoor & outdoor art.

Growing up in Chicago I started going to the art institute at a very young age.

In addition to 2 dimensional art I enjoying exploring architecture as well.

Between my active role in the community & my love of art, I would be a good candidate for the position.

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I covered it all in the first box!!
Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

See above
Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I live over by CA AV and I helped work on a few murals.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I'm not aware of any issues to date.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
More transparency!

I have no experience with the a public Art Master Plan
If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
93 Packet Pg. 102 of 541

Signature Name of signatory: Elizabeth Mann
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/24/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
94 Packet Pg. 103 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 8 September 2025, 7:29pm
Receipt number 24
Related form version 9
Name Marilyn GottliebRoberts
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 4
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
95 Packet Pg. 104 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation I am an experienced professional artist.

In search of the memory of oral farming almanacs, in 1980 I left my practice as a classically-trained painter for performance installations in southeastern US communities; residences in over 30 West African villages & nomadic encampments; & was invited to participate in international cultural astronomy conferences.

Those experiences resulted in exhibitions in venues that have included the Clocktower, Exit Art, & the American Mus. of Nat'l History in NYC; Harvard's Carpenter Center, & Mobius Performance in MA; & interactive public art installations in Miami & Atlanta commissioned by Miami's Art in Public Places program.

My work is held in public and private collections that include the Miami Public Library System's Main Library, the Library's Vasari Collection, Univ. Miami Richter Library's Special Collections, Ruth & Marvin Sackner Collection of Artist Books, & the Musee nationale d’art moderne au centre Pompidou, fond. Posner (Paris FR).

Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

Univ. Miami MFA; tenured Professor of Studio & Art History awarded 2 Endowed Teaching Chairs, Miami Dade College (ret.); Visiting Artist at Harvard Univ; 2 Fulbright Scholar Teaching/Research Awards at Nigeria's Univ. Jos.

For 15 yrs a Preliminary Adjudicator for the Annual Awards of the Nat'l.

Foundation for Advancement in the Arts; 3 times International Cultural Exchange Grants panelist for Miami-Dade County Dept. Cultural Affairs, 2 times an Individual Artist Fellowships panelist for the FL Div. of Cultural Affairs.

Publications include the artist book "A Durable Tale" & peer-reviewed cultural astronomy essays publ. in the Proceedings of Conferences held at the Hayden Planetarium in NYC, & the Bulgaria Academy of Science in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Competitive awards include Miami's Bas Fischer Award; Dade Co. Cult.

Affairs Artist Access grant; 2 Atlantic Center for the Arts residencies, New Smyrna Beach FL; Goat Island performance art residency, Art Institute of Chicago.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

For 10 yrs was founding co-Director of the annual Miami Waves Experimental Film & Performance Art events; for nearly 20 yrs was featured lecturer at the annual national orientation for Foreign Fulbright Scholars; was 3 times a selected participant in the National Science Foundation's "Math and Art Workshop" at Franklin and Marshall College (PA). Was a Referee for the "African Studies Review" of the African Studies Association; & for the "NAWACS Journal" of the National Association of Nigerian Women Academics. Was one of 5 Academic Reviewers for the 7th Edition of Janson’s "History of Art" (publ.

Pearson/Prentice Hall).

Personal and Job Experience
2 of 4
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
96 Packet Pg. 105 of 541

My service on cultural, civic, & private Boards of Directors in Miami FL includes the civic Miami Beach Development Corporation Board; & cultural Executive Boards of the South Florida Composer's Alliance, & Tigertail Productions.

A Founding Board member of my Miami Beach FL condo assn., I am now Board Secretary of the condo assn where my CA studio is located.

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
Relatively recently settled in Palo Alto, I offer my service to the Commission because I would like to continue to be of service to my community, want the broader knowledge of community life that is afforded by public service, and for the personal sense of fulfillment and meaning that is a part of such service. With is offer I bring my history as a public art evaluator, panelist and commissioned artist; and my experience as an professional arts educator and cultural and civic activist.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I watched the archived video of two private projects presented to the Public Art Commission's 2025 June 19 meeting: Experienced professionals presented renderings of the proposed structures & examples of the art being considered. A commercial development on the former site of the Fish Market was presented & was followed by a plan to repurpose an existing Stanford structure at 975 Page Mill Road.

The commercial enterprise showed interest in the decorative and status- enhancing potential of art, with a maritime nod to the site's former identity as a beloved old seafood restaurant. The Stanford project presented examples of art with retinal and conceptual beauty, sophisticated virtuosity, & functional relevance to the multi-use tech area of a major university. The Commissioners treated both teams with kindness & courtesy, asked helpful, informed & thoughtful questions of both presenters.

I happily noticed that the setting, participants & process felt familiar & comfortable.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
The Cubberly Center's plans for renewal (also discussed in the above 2025 June 19 video archive) piqued my interest because of its resonance with one of the Commission's goals ("To devise methods of selecting and commissioning artists with respect to the design, execution, and placement of art in public places....").

I could imagine, for instance, working with members of the CASP community to develop a program to deepen appreciation of the evolving history of public art and to work-shop imagined designs for actual local spaces.

Such an undertaking could possibly lead to related work with the Library to fill in any perceived gaps in their collection of public art texts.

Depending of the success of those initial ventures, I could also imagine doing something similar with the CASP community on artist books, zines, cartoons, and the graphic novel.

I have read the document but have had no experience working with it. It impressed me as being very professional and well organized.

Application Questions
3 of 4
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
97 Packet Pg. 106 of 541

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Marilyn G. Roberts
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/08/2025
4 of 4
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
98 Packet Pg. 107 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 7:58pm
Receipt number 27
Related form version 10
Name Robin Mullery
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? Yes
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Email from the City
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
99 Packet Pg. 108 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation I am a practicing psychotherapist and visual artist Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.

I received an MFA in 2004 and have been a practicing artist for over 10 years. I am actively angeged int he arts community in Palo Alto and more broadly in the Bay Area. I have attended numerous artist residencies where I learn about other artists' work, process, and community. I am currently in my second term as a Cubberly Artist in Residence for the City of Palo Alto. I have an interest in public art and have attended several workshops on Public Art given by the Public Art Network of Americans for the Arts, CODAworx, and the Public Art Administrators Network of Northern California. In addition, I am a licensed psychotherapist in private practice in Palo Alto for almost 20 years and have strong communication skills, am adept at understanding others' perspectives, facilitating productive discussions, and sensitively engaging with diverse groups.

Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

I am a Project Look volunteer for the Palo Alto Art Center, I open my studio to the community twice a year at our Cubberly Artist in Residence Open Studios events which I also help to organize, I typically provide two to three community art/craft workshops every year partnering with the City of Palo Alto Library staff, I volunteer as a field trip driver at my kids' middle schools when needed, and I was a Project Cornerstone Volunteer for Addison Elementary school for six years meeting monthly with a classroom of elementary school students to read and discuss a book with a social emotional emphasis. In my role as a psychotherapist I reserve a portion of my practice for pro-bono clients and throughout the pandemic I gave pro-bono counseling sessions to ICU doctors and nurses through an organization called the Front Line Workers Project.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I believe public art is a necessary and vital part of maintaining a healthy community that feels rooted in place, people, and culture, especially in our STEM and business heavy city. I am interested in serving on the Public Art Commission to support the ongoing goals and work of the Public Art Department and to contribute to the community of Palo Alto which has supported me as an artist and community member. I have lived, owned a business, and made art in Palo Alto for almost 25 years and have directly engaged with the community as an artist through open studios and workshops I facilitate on a regular basis. When my kids were young we went to a number of workshops, art activities, and made up art walks in Palo Alto. Public art has been a valuable third space for us like many others. I have strong communication and consensus building skills from my years as a therapist and I enjoy the process of finding a way to get something done that involves multiple stakeholders and seems difficult.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

I'm very interested in Code:ART, a highly impactful Public Art program.

The growth of the program to include partnering with local business is a direction that makes a lot of sense both fiscally long term and from an engagement perspective. It would be incredible to have Code:ART Application Questions 2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
100

Packet Pg. 109 of 541

annually. September/October is a time when the city really shines, from the Glass Pumpkin Patch, to the Moonlight Run/Walk, to Halloween when the neighborhoods are teeming with kids and adults trick-or- treating. Code:ART is a great multi-night addition that continues the reach across generations this time of year as the weather cools and nights are longer.

Another issue that recently came before the commission that I am interested in the 1% for public art that comes with certain private development projects. Though I would need to get up to speed on the program and the nature of the relationships, I feel there is potential for more community engaging public art than sometimes makes it through the process.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
I would like to see the Commission continue the goal of building community through public art. There is more and more research showing people feel isolated and disconnected from others, leading to depression and anxiety. The third space that public art can create is one way to address this growing concern for our community.

The current Public Art Department and program are a major asset to the community, being well run by staff who have a strong vision based on community input from the Master Plan and time and again execute on plan. Without more background I’m afraid coming up with specific goals, other than supporting the Department and providing perspective as an artist and community member are likely overreaching and uninformed.

However, without falling too far into conjecture, I suspect Code:ART as a yearly event, partnered with businesses, community groups, school art departments, etc. could be a way to work toward this goal leveraging the Departments existing work.

I have read through the Public Art Master Plan and given thought to it, but have no other experience with it directly.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Robin Mullery
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
101

Packet Pg. 110 of 541

Public Art Commission Application
Submitted on 23 September 2025, 11:13am
Receipt number 33
Related form version 10
Name Simon Tran
Cell Phone Number
Home Phone Number
Email Address
Are you a Palo Alto resident? No
Address
City
Postal Code
Do you have any relatives or members of your household who are employed by the City of Palo Alto, who are currently serving on the City Council, or who are Commissioners or Board Members?
No
Are you available and committed to complete the term applied for?
Yes
Fair Political Practices
No
Excluding your principal residence, do you or your spouse own real property in Palo Alto?
No
How did you learn about the vacancy on the Public Art
Commission?
Other: Denise Laxen di Zazzo
Personal Information
1 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
102

Packet Pg. 111 of 541

Consent to Publish Personal Information on the City of Palo Alto Website Occupation Artists in Education Manager at Southern Exposure -Curate and design exhibitions involving intergenerational artists -Preparatory/ art handling
-Facilitate multi-layer group projects for teaching artists and students -Teach art history, ranging from contemporary local artists to modern art -Budget management for teacher payroll, materials and supplies -Curriculum, lesson planning
-Community outreach through tabling and flyer distribution -Hiring/training a wide range of teaching artists
-Mentor high school and college students
-Assist art teachers in several high school AP art classes Please list your relevant education, training, experience, certificates of training, licenses, and professional registration.

If describing work experience, please include
company/employer name and occupation.
-University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA- Bachelor's in Art Practice, 2015
-Gallery Manager at Berkeley Art Center, 2019-2021
-Prepared and managed artist contracts and loan agreements -Preparatory/ art handling
-Gallery sitting/maintenance of facilities
-Maintenance of digital archive
-Communications and social media
-Exhibition design
-Event host
-Professional Artist, 2015-present
-Mural painting and commissions for Montage Health, Facebook/Meta Open Arts, Sunnyvale, Chapter 510, Oakland, City of Oakland, Berkeley, San Leandro, & Palo Alto
-Exhibited at Berkeley Art Museum and Oakland Museum of California -Exhibited in galleries in several states
-Guest curator, NIAD Art Center, Richmond CA, 2021 and 2024 Album art and poster/product design
Please describe your involvement in community activities, volunteer and civic organizations.

I have volunteered for Creativity Growth and Creativity Explored where I assisted and advocated for adult artists with disabilities. I mentor a Youth Advisory Board at Southern Exposure and create art exhibitions focusing on topics that are important to the teens made by the teens. I have also managed holiday pop up shops where students were able to sell hand made goods and art. As gallery manager at Berkeley Art Center I programmed art lectures that featured art historians that were free to the public.

Personal and Job Experience

1. Why are you interested in serving on the Public Art
Commission and what experience would you bring to the
position?
I am interested in public installation of artwork made by artists with disabilities from various generations and backgrounds. I would like more collaborations between artists and community members with a focus on Application Questions
2 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
103

Packet Pg. 112 of 541

school age students and also elders.

2. Please describe an issue that recently came before the Commission that is of particular interest to you and describe why you are interested in it.

Over the summer I had the pleasure of sharing a studio with King artist resident, Alma Landeta, at Cubberley. I got to learn about their varied projects that they created. I think the paintings, social practice project, and installation they did for the city were wonderful. I would like to be involved in making sure a diverse roster of artists are involved in the King residency and perhaps nurturing a community and network that will support that program.

3. If you are appointed, what specific goals would you like to see the Public Art Commission achieve, and how would you help in the process?
Expanding public engagement with public art installations through art history publications, zines, social media posts.

Further expand the pool of artists eligible for public projects. Accessibility of information through language translation, gaining awareness through engaging in various community centers and libraires.

Create art opportunities for artists with disabilities through workshops, lectures, commission artworks that consider different levels of accessibility.

I haven't engaged with this document but I have created write ups, essays, and design posters/fliers for exhibitions that I have curated.

If you'd like to provide any additional documents, please upload below.

Please confirm that you have read the Boards and
Commissions Handbook.

Yes
Signature Name of signatory: Simon Tran
Link to signature
Date Completed 09/23/2025
3 of 3
Item 2
Attachment C - PAC Applications -
Redacted

Item 2: Staff Report
Pg.
104

Packet Pg. 113 of 541

City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: STUDY SESSION
Lead Department: Planning and Development Services
Meeting Date: October 6, 2025
Report #:2509-5194
TITLE
San Antonio Road Area Plan: Provide Feedback on Existing Conditions Analysis and Land Use and Mobility Priorities. CEQA Status: Exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 15262.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council review the San Antonio Road Area Plan Existing Conditions Assessment Summary and provide preliminary feedback to staff on considerations discussed in this report in advance of developing land use and mobility alternatives.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The draft Existing Conditions Analysis Summary Report (Attachment A) outlines key findings on current conditions in the Plan Area and their interaction with existing regulations, highlighting development opportunities and challenges. The Executive Summary of Attachment A presents these findings. This study session provides an opportunity to brief the City Council on the report and advisory body feedback, and solicit initial input on project considerations to guide the next phase – developing land use and transportation alternatives.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The San Antonio Road Area Plan will guide development in the 275.3-acre corridor with an integrated land use and transportation strategy. Its objectives include expanding housing, improving mobility, providing open space, strengthening commercial nodes, upgrading infrastructure, and advancing sustainability. The plan will set policies, standards, and guidelines to implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Housing Element, while building on related efforts such as the Sustainability and Climate Action Plan, Safe Streets for All Action Plan, and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan update.

Item 3
Item 3 Staff Report

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
1 Packet Pg. 114 of 541

BACKGROUND
The City Council designated the Bayshore Alma San Antonio (BASA) Area as a Priority Development Area (PDA) on September 18, 2023.1 PDAs are locally created to support regional goals set forth by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as described in Plan Bay Area. Plan Bay Area outlines the Bay Area’s Regional Growth Framework, Regional Transportation Plan, and Sustainable Community Strategies through 2050 and beyond. Key goals of PDAs include encouraging and guiding growth around transit and connecting housing to jobs and areas of interest.

The Area Plan boundary covers most of the larger BASA PDA and includes 53 Housing Element Opportunity Sites with capacity for 1,559 units, of which 614 are designated for lower-income households. The Plan Area is also shaped by existing and proposed development nearby, including across the border in Mountain View. Currently, it prioritizes vehicle traffic while lacking adequate pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities; combined with speeding beyond posted limits, this creates safety concerns. To achieve housing, mobility, and sustainability goals, the Plan requires an integrated land use and circulation strategy, with a central aim of providing safe, convenient multimodal connections.

The Area Plan budget was approved by the Council in March 2025, and work began in April 2025. Phase one of the Area Plan includes analysis of the area through literature and regulatory review, site visits, collection of new data, stakeholder interviews, workshops, surveys, and other technical studies to determine the area’s existing conditions, strengths, and challenges.

Staff convened both a Community Advisory Group (CAG) made up of area residents (from both Palo Alto and Mountain View) and stakeholders and a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) made up of City staff and subject matter experts on August 19 and August 21, 2025, respectively. The Existing Conditions Analysis Summary Report is before the Council at this time, having previously been presented to other advisory committees, boards and commissions.2 A Community Survey is being conducted in the month of October, and the first Community Workshop will be held on October 23, 2025.

Preliminary input received from these meetings included topics which the next phase of the project should explore:
Determining how much additional housing capacity the Plan Area should include Improving connectivity to transit, community amenities, and retail Improving safety for those traveling along and across San Antonio Avenue and Alma Street
1 https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?meetingTemplateId=13026 2 The Existing Conditions Assessment was presented to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee on September 9, 2025; Planning and Transportation Commission on September 10, 2025; Architectural Review Board on September 18, 2025; and the City/School Transportation Safety Committee on September 25, 2025.

Item 3
Item 3 Staff Report

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
2 Packet Pg. 115 of 541

Improving vehicle traffic flow for existing and future users, including understanding origin and destination of drivers
Exploring methods of preserving existing retail and employment after redevelopment Developing options for adding green space and retail space, especially those which would reduce vehicle trips
Planning for how much parking is needed within the Plan Area Preparing for impacts to RVs parked within the Plan Area Mitigating for flood zones and future sea level rise
Cooperating with Mountain View and major property owners adjacent to the Plan Area Engaging with school districts on individual school capacity and safe routes for schools Representing impacts of the Area Plan on the City as a whole

ANALYSIS
The Existing Conditions Assessment is a key deliverable in the first phase of the project.

Preliminary findings, included in Attachment A, are based on technical analysis, regulatory review, and literature review, including existing City and regional planning documents.

The report considers the following topic areas:
Land Use: Existing built environment, applicable State laws, zoning regulations found in the Palo Alto Municipal Code, land use designations found in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and amenities such as schools, parks, community centers, and retail in and around the plan area.
Housing, Growth, and Displacement: Existing housing stock, pipeline development projects, City planning documents, and housing affordability. Transportation: Automobile, bicycle, pedestrian, and mass transit networks in the proximate Plan Area, as well as safety concerns related to those networks. Market Analysis: Housing market, retail market, and employment market. Hazards, Public Safety, and Historic Resources: Flooding, geologic, and fire hazards, emergency response, and historic context of the built environment. Parks, Outdoor Spaces, and Public Facilities: Existing amenities within and adjacent to the Plan Area.
Air Quality, Noise, and Vibration: Existing conditions and local and regional thresholds for impacts.
Infrastructure: City owned utility facilities in the Plan Area. Climate and Resilience: Local and regional policies and data.

Council Feedback Requested
Based on the findings identified in the draft Existing Conditions Analysis Summary Report (Attachment A), there are several notable assets and opportunities for consideration in developing the Area Plan. Staff believes that updating land use designations, development standards, and improving active transportation routes and connections to the San Antonio Item 3
Item 3 Staff Report

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
3 Packet Pg. 116 of 541

Caltrain Station are key to the Plan’s success. In order to develop complete neighborhoods, the Area Plan will also address open space/parks, retail, transit, and utilities.

The upcoming community meetings and alternatives development will be informed by the work to date and the following assumptions. Council feedback – particularly on areas of potential disagreement or concern – is requested:

1. Housing. The 53 Housing Element Opportunity Sites with a capacity for 1,559 units represents a baseline level of housing production and a low growth alternative. Other scenarios will consider increased housing production to represent mid- and high- housing growth projections. Across all scenarios, the opportunity sites and regional housing needs allocation capacity may be re-evaluated within the plan area.

2. Office. Allowance for commercial office development can entice redevelopment and support local interests to create affordable housing opportunities, infrastructure and mobility improvements, retail, and access to open space. One or more scenarios will examine plan-area specific office caps to create net new office floor area that would otherwise be exempt from existing limitations and caps. In addition to net new office, it is anticipated commercial office, R&D or similar uses removed or demolished to support housing or mixed use development could be re-established in the within the plan area as an incentive to advance plan objectives.

3. Building Height, Floor Area and Density. Each scenario will evaluate modification to development standards, however, for higher density housing, 85 feet, which represents five stories over a two or three story concrete podium is anticipated, and similar to what has recently been proposed along portions of San Antonio Road. Staff will be prepared to discuss taller housing typologies if asked by Council. It is anticipated that at least one scenario may include tall commercial office buildings adjacent to the freeway or within the San Antonio and Charleston Roads and Transport triangle, similar with planned development activity in adjacent Mountain View.

4. Transportation. Mobility improvements for all travelers, such as redesigning all or portions of San Antonio Road, utilizing special setbacks or easements, creating bike/ped facilities through neighborhoods, exploring private and regional connectivity solutions to improve access to/from transit services and destinations will be considered for all scenarios and tiered to anticipated funding sources from redevelopment and other strategies to support desired outcomes.

5. Open Space. Other than the public right of way, the City controls little land in the plan area making it challenging to locate new open space. Through land acquisition or public- private partnerships, the plan will seek to create opportunities within a reasonable walking distance to new housing and may be incorporated into ‘third spaces’ shared with retail or neighborhood serving uses or services.

6. Retail. Consistent with other city strategies, retail will be prioritized where it can be aggregated in locations with good access and visibility near future housing and employment. Isolated retail along San Antonio Road without the support of other assembled uses and services is less likely to succeed and not anticipated to be pursued in the scenario planning efforts.

Item 3
Item 3 Staff Report

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
4 Packet Pg. 117 of 541

Next Steps
A Community Survey is being conducted in the month of October, and the first community workshop is scheduled for October 23, 2025. The discussion with the community will include exercises that will identify community needs in the Plan Area and the types of improvements most desired by the public. The community survey running during the month of October will allow additional feedback on specific questions from community members who are unable to attend the workshop.

The direction received from the City Council, and feedback from advisory bodies and the community will inform the scope of the land use and mobility alternatives. These alternatives will be shared with the community and the advisory bodies in the first half of 2026 and are planned for review by City Council in June 2026, before work on the final plan elements and the environmental review begin.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Several 2030 Comprehensive Plan policies directly support the Area Plan:
Growth & Community: Policies L-1.10, L-2.2–2.4, L-2.6, L-2.11–2.12, and L-3.4 address growth management, sustainable communities, and neighborhood character. Commerce & Employment: Policies L-4.5, L-4.16, and L-5.4 guide commercial centers and employment districts.
Design & Public Realm: Policies L-6.6–6.7 focus on building and public space design. Parks & Streets: Policies L-8.6, L-9.3, L-9.6, and L-9.7 support parks, streets, and public spaces.

The 2023–2031 Housing Element reinforces these goals, with Program 6.6(C) directing preparation of the San Antonio Road Corridor plan and identifying 53 Housing Opportunity Sites, emphasizing housing near the Caltrain station. The Housing Incentive Program (HIP), adopted in 2019 and updated in 2025, further promotes multi-family and mixed-use development across much of the Plan Area.

FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
The Area Plan budget was approved by the Council on March 10, 2025, with an amount not to exceed $1,979,902.5 There are no additional costs associated with this action item.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Community Engagement is the key to the success of the planning effort. The project team has created a robust community engagement strategy, which includes a dedicated webpage, social media and email announcements, formation of the Community Advisory Group (CAG) and Technical Advisory Group (TAG), stakeholder interviews, community workshops, surveys, 5 CMR 2501-4703 was approved on March 10, 2025 and can be viewed here:
https://cityofpaloalto.primegov.com/meetings/ItemWithTemplateType?id=7153&meetingTemplateType=2&comp iledMeetingDocumentId=13423
Item 3
Item 3 Staff Report

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
5 Packet Pg. 118 of 541

meetings with the City Council and advisory commissions, committees, and boards, and pop- ups including tabling at City events and Farmers Markets. Given the proximity of the Plan Area to Mountain View, the City hosted Mountain View’s Community Development Director and key planning, transportation, and public works staff for an initial discussion of the plan, and the two cities’ long range planning teams meet once a month to share information about the plan and adjacent areas.

The first CAG meeting was held on August 19, 2025, and the first TAG meeting on August 21, 2025. The first survey is currently live on the project’s webpage, and the first community workshop will be held on October 23, 2025, at the Cubberley Community Center. Feedback will be incorporated into the Land Use and Mobility Alternatives, which will have their own series of public outreach in late 2025 through early 2026.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The actions recommended in this report are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15262: A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions that has not been approved, adopted, or funded would not have significant impact on the environment. The City will prepare an environmental analysis for the San Antonio Road Area Plan when more project specifics have been identified.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: San Antonio Road Area Plan: Existing Conditions Analysis Summary Report, September 4, 2025 Draft
Attachment B: San Antonio Road Area Plan Map
APPROVED BY:

Jonathan Lait, Planning and Development Services Director Item 3
Item 3 Staff Report

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
6 Packet Pg. 119 of 541

SEPTEMBER 4, 2025 DRAFT

San Antonio Road Area Plan
Existing Conditions Analysis
Summary Report
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
7 Packet Pg. 120 of 541

INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 About the Project .............................................................................................................. 1 How This Document Is Organized ..................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3 Location and Context ........................................................................................................ 3 Existing Uses and Character .............................................................................................. 3 Housing Market Conditions............................................................................................... 4 Housing Initiatives ............................................................................................................ 4 Housing Affordability ........................................................................................................ 5 Existing Employment and Businesses ................................................................................ 5 Climate Resilience and Environmental Hazards ................................................................ 6 Potential Impacts on Services from Population Growth .................................................... 6 I. LAND USE AND ZONING ............................................................................................ 7 Existing Uses and Built Character ...................................................................................... 7 Regulatory Context and City Initiatives ............................................................................. 8 Pipeline Projects ............................................................................................................... 9 Outdoor Space and Placemaking Opportunities ............................................................. 10 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 11

2. HOUSING, GROWTH, AND DISPLACEMENT RISK ...................................................... 13 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 13 Existing Housing Characteristics ...................................................................................... 13 Residential Displacement Risk ........................................................................................ 14 Housing Need and Policy ................................................................................................ 16 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 19

3. TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY .......................................................................... 20 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 20 Road Network ................................................................................................................. 20 Bicycle Network .............................................................................................................. 23 Pedestrian Network ........................................................................................................ 25 Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
8 Packet Pg. 121 of 541

Transit Services ............................................................................................................... 26 Safety .............................................................................................................................. 26 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 28

4. MARKET AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ....................................................................... 30 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 30 Housing Market Conditions............................................................................................. 31 Retail Market Conditions and Trends .............................................................................. 32 Employment Profile and Trends ...................................................................................... 33 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 34

5. HAZARDS, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND HISTORIC RESOURCES ........................................... 36 Hazards ........................................................................................................................... 36 Public Safety ................................................................................................................... 37 Historic Resources .......................................................................................................... 38 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 38

6. PARKS, OPEN SPACE, AND PUBLIC FACILITIES .......................................................... 39 Schools............................................................................................................................ 39 Parks and Recreational Facilities ..................................................................................... 40 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 40

7. NOISE AND AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................... 41 Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................................ 41 Air Quality ....................................................................................................................... 42 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 42

8. INFRASTRUCTURE ................................................................................................... 43 Storm Drain Infrastructure .............................................................................................. 43 Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure ......................................................................................... 44 Domestic and Recycled Water Infrastructure ................................................................. 44 Natural Gas and Electricity Infrastructure ....................................................................... 45 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 45

9. CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE ....................................................................................... 46 Policies Regarding Climate Hazard Planning ................................................................... 46 Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
9 Packet Pg. 122 of 541

Baseline Conditions and Projections ............................................................................... 46 Key Findings and Conclusions ......................................................................................... 48

TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Plan Area And Surrounding Context .................................................................. 2 Figure 2. Crash Severity In The Plan Area, 2015-2024 ...................................................... 3 Figure 3. Plan Area Zoning, Hip And Focus Area Boundaries ............................................ 4 Figure 4. Open Space Access In The Plan Area ................................................................. 5 Figure 1.1. Existing Uses, Built Form And Character Areas ............................................... 7 Figure 1.2. Zoning, Focus Areas And Hip Boundaries ....................................................... 8 Figure 1.3. Plan Area Pipeline Projects ............................................................................. 9 Figure 1.4. Open Space Access ....................................................................................... 10 Figure 1.5. Critical Areas Of Safety And Mobility Focus .................................................. 10 Figure 1.6. Development Opportunities ......................................................................... 12 Figure 2.1. Plan Area Census Block Groups .................................................................... 13 Figure 2.2. Household Income, 2019-2023 ..................................................................... 15 Figure 2.3. 5th And 6th Cycle Rhna Goals And Progress, 2025 ....................................... 17 Figure 3.1. Roadway Classification ................................................................................. 20 Figure 3.2. Pm Peak Hour Traffic Volumes By Intersection............................................. 21 Figure 3.3. Existing Bicycle Facilities ............................................................................... 23 Figure 3.4. Bicycle Level Of Traffic Stress ....................................................................... 24 Figure 3.5. Pedestrian Facilities ...................................................................................... 25 Figure 3.6. Crash Severity ............................................................................................... 27 Figure 4.1. Plan Area Census Block Groups .................................................................... 30 Figure 4.2. Household Types, 2019-2023 ....................................................................... 30 Figure 5.1. Fema Special Flood Hazard Area In The Plan Area ........................................ 36 Figure 6.1. School Districts In The Plan Area .................................................................. 39 Figure 8.1. 2015 Storm Drain Master Plan Priority Projects ........................................... 43 Figure 9.1. Slr Exposure Projections ............................................................................... 47 Figure 9.2. Existing And Projected Groundwater Depth ................................................. 47 Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
10 Packet Pg. 123 of 541

TABLE OF TABLES
Table 1.1. Plan Area Pipeline Projects .................................................................................... 9 Table 2.1. Housing Units by Building Type .............................................................................. 14 Table 2.2. Housing Element Units from Opportunity Sites .......................................................... 17 Table 3.1. Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Speed Surveys ...................................................... 22 Table 4.1. Permitted Housing Units by Building Type, 2018-2024 ................................................ 31 Table 4.2. Percent Change in Employment in Plan Area, 2012-2022. ............................................ 33 Table 9.1. Summary of Hazard Projections ............................................................................. 46

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
11 Packet Pg. 124 of 541

1 INTRODUCTION
This is a draft report summarizing the existing conditions within and around the boundaries of the San Antonio Road Area Plan. Please note that some sections of this analysis are in progress as of the publication of this draft, and analysis will continue as part of the Area Plan’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

About the Project
The San Antonio Road Area Plan (Area Plan) is a multi-year initiative by the City of Palo Alto to reimagine land use, transportation, and community development for an area of 275 acres encompassing the roadway and private properties on both sides of San Antonio Road, one of the City’s and region’s key transportation corridors. This area, referred to in this document as the Plan Area, is located along the south-eastern edge of Palo Alto, adjacent to its boundary with Mountain View, and covers most of the Bayshore Alma San Antonio (BASA) Priority Development Area (PDA) boundary.

Initiated in March 2025, the Area Plan will have five phases and is anticipated to be completed by 2028. It will build on recent City efforts including the 2023-2031 Housing Element, which established “Focus Areas” for the Plan Area, the Housing Incentive Program (HIP), the 2025 Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action Plan, and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update (in progress). The Area Plan will include a land use program; development standards; policies for transportation, housing, and environmental sustainability among other topics; implementation recommendations; and financing strategies. Community input will be critical to shaping the Area Plan outcomes. The project includes robust engagement including community workshops, pop-up events, surveys, advisory groups, and public meetings. Key goals of the Area Plan include:
• Create a more livable community. Promote compact, mixed-use development with housing options at all income levels, local businesses, and well-designed public spaces. • Improve mobility and safety. Enhance streets, sidewalks, bike lanes, and transit connections for easier and safer travel and crossings, and improved access to the San Antonio Caltrain Station. • Support sustainability. Integrate green infrastructure, reduce emissions, and ensure resilience to climate change.
• Enhance economic vitality. Attract new businesses and strengthen Palo Alto’s economy while preserving cherished local establishments and community character.

San Antonio Road is an important regional arterial connecting US-101 (Bayshore Freeway) in the east to Alma Street/Central Expressway in the west, and beyond to El Camino Real and Foothill Expressway. It serves as an important truck route and facilitates access to key employment centers. Within the Plan Area, major crossings along San Antonio Road include US-101, East Charleston Road, Middlefield Road, and Alma Street/Central Expressway. The San Antonio Station of the Caltrain commuter rail line is located near the south-western corner of the Plan Area. Adjacent to the Plan Area are residential neighborhoods in Palo Alto and Mountain View.

At present, the Plan Area has a mix of industrial, office, service commercial, and residential uses, with some properties transforming from commercial or industrial uses to residential and mixed use. There are only a few retail stores and no parks or other community spaces. While there are several community amenities in the vicinity, including parks, schools, grocery stores, and institutions (refer Figure 1); access to these destinations is difficult at present because of inadequate pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity. Substantial placemaking Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
12 Packet Pg. 125 of 541

2 efforts, including urban design, public realm, and safety improvements such as Complete Streets, are required to provide safer, more convenient transportation options. These improvements can enhance the attractiveness of the Plan Area for current and future residents, and help meet the City’s housing, sustainability, and mobility goals.

Figure 1. Plan Area and Surrounding Context

How This Document Is Organized
This Summary Report presents key findings from analysis carried out by the project team to assess existing conditions within the Plan Area. Serving as an introduction to the project, it offers a concise overview of current conditions and key findings, organized by topic. For the purposes of this document, true cardinal directions are not used, but rather descriptors consistent with northbound/southbound as used for Highway 101: San Francisco is north, San Jose is south, and the San Francisco Bay is east.

Source: Raimi + Associates, Google Earth

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
13 Packet Pg. 126 of 541

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Location and Context
San Antonio Road is an important transportation corridor for Palo Alto and the surrounding region. The Area Plan includes approximately 275 acres on either side of a 1.8-mile segment of San Antonio Road. Located along the boundary of Palo Alto and Mountain View, the Plan Area is influenced by development trends and movement patterns in both cities. Connections to US-101 (Bayshore Freeway), Alma Street/Central Expressway, and proximity to the San Antonio Caltrain station influence the area as well.

Existing Uses and Character
The Plan Area has a diverse mix of industrial, office,
service commercial, and residential uses; and some
properties are starting to transform from
commercial or industrial uses to mixed-use. At
present, the built character varies across the Plan
Area, and the land use pattern is fragmented. The
Plan Area itself lacks community spaces such as
parks, and has only a few retail establishments, but
in its vicinity, there are a number of community
destinations such as parks, schools, grocery stores,
institutions, and other uses. Connectivity to these
amenities is, however, limited at present because of
inadequate pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

Substantial placemaking efforts, including urban
design, public realm, and safety improvements such
as Complete Streets, are required to provide safer,
more convenient transportation options. These
improvements can help meet the City’s housing,
mobility, and sustainability goals, and enhance the
accessibility and usability of the Plan Area for
current and future residents.

Mobility
The current condition of San Antonio Road
prioritizes vehicles and is less accommodating for
pedestrians and cyclists. Limited bicycle
infrastructure, known gaps in the pedestrian
network, such as the absence of continuous
sidewalks and unprotected crossings, as well as the
lack of shade, restrict bicycle and pedestrian travel
to major neighborhood destinations. Transit is

Figure 2. Crash Severity in the Plan Area, 2015-2024
Source: Raimi + Associates, City of Palo
l
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
14 Packet Pg. 127 of 541

4 available within the Plan Area; however, bus service is limited and there is poor connectivity to the San Antonio Caltrain Station, despite its proximity. Comprehensive improvements to ensure multimodal connectivity and safety may be necessary to provide sustainable travel options for Plan Area residents, workers, and visitors as its population increases. These improvements will be designed to reduce traffic congestion as mixed-use development increases.

Safety is one of the key issues that need to be addressed in the Plan Area. Vehicle speeds along San Antonio Road often exceed posted limits, associated with a significant share of collisions. Figure 2 shows key locations and severity of collisions within the Plan Area. Investments in street, bicycle, and sidewalk infrastructure will improve safety and strengthen connections both within the Plan Area, to San Antonio Caltrain Station, and to other destinations in Palo Alto and Mountain View.

Housing Market Conditions
Although few housing projects have been built in the
Plan Area since the 1990s, it has attracted
development interest in recent years, and several
pipeline projects could yield up to 750 housing units
if completed as proposed. This would be a significant
increase over the 802 residential units that currently
exist in the Plan Area. There is strong demand for
housing in Palo Alto, and the Plan Area may attract
mid-rise multifamily projects, which align with the
City’s regulatory and policy priorities for higher-
density development. As the area evolves,
development standards will be needed to guide
compatibility between adjacent uses, and transitions
in built form and scale. Because all pipeline projects
are located on privately owned land, they remain
subject to market volatility and other development
uncertainties. Successful implementation may
depend on targeted incentives that encourage the
provision of community amenities as part of private
development.

Housing Initiatives
The City of Palo Alto’s 2023–2031 Housing Element
identifies 53 opportunity sites in the Plan Area,
representing 1,559 new housing units, and
designated the GM- and ROLM-zoned districts as
Focus Areas to stimulate housing production. In
addition, the City’s Housing Incentive Program (HIP) applies to a portion of the Plan Area, as shown in Figure 3.

Together, these initiatives have already expanded development capacity along San Antonio Road. Given strong demand for housing in Palo Alto, and the available housing development opportunities within the Plan Area, the area is well-positioned to capture demand for additional housing units associated with projected household and employment growth.

Figure 3. Plan Area Zoning, HIP and Focus Area

Source: Raimi + Associates, City of Palo

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
15 Packet Pg. 128 of 541

5 Housing Affordability
The Plan Area currently contains about 250 deed-restricted affordable housing units across four properties, as well as a small number of “naturally affordable” rental housing units (that have lower rents than City averages but are not deed-restricted). While homeowners and residents of deed-restricted units face lower displacement risk, renters in market-rate units may be more vulnerable to displacement as the Plan Area redevelops. With many sites identified for future housing, the Plan Area is well positioned to support lower-income households through inclusionary requirements, affordable housing fees, and, when funding is available, new or preserved deed- restricted affordable housing projects. The addition of housing in the Plan Area that is affordable at a range of income levels can help meet the needs of current and future residents and workers in Palo Alto.

Existing Employment and
Businesses
According to U.S. Census data, as of 2022, the Plan
Area accounted for about four percent of the City’s
total jobs, but nearly 40 percent of its jobs in the
Manufacturing sector. Small office and light
industrial spaces, particularly near Commercial
Street and Industrial Avenue, provide flexible,
relatively affordable options for local businesses. As
these spaces redevelop for housing or higher-
intensity employment uses, existing small-scale
businesses may be at risk of displacement, especially
given the limited supply of comparable spaces
elsewhere in Palo Alto.

Community Amenities
The Plan Area includes some religious institutions
and community spaces, including the Oshman
Family Jewish Community Center, and is adjacent to
the Cubberley Community Center and Baylands
Nature Preserve. However, the Plan Area itself has
no parks or open spaces and is limited in retail nodes
or other “third places” for community gathering. As
the Plan Area adds more residents, such spaces will
need to be included. A portion of the Plan Area is
also “park deficient” by being more than a 10-
minute walk away from an open space nearby, as
shown in Figure 4.

While there are limited retail uses within the Plan Area at present, there are a few valued local businesses. Retail offerings in the vicinity, including on El Camino Real and Mountain View’s San Antonio Center, can meet many day-to-day shopping needs. As the Plan Area redevelops, it is more likely to serve as a secondary retail location Figure 4. Open Space Access in the Plan Area
Source: Raimi + Associates, City of Palo Alto GIS
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
16 Packet Pg. 129 of 541

6 that is better suited to neighborhood-serving restaurants, coffee shops, drugstores, and personal services. Retail demand is projected to grow gradually and may require a larger resident base before supporting significant new retail amenities, such as a new grocery store. The Area Plan will need to incorporate a vision and policies to encourage concentration of future retail at key locations with high visibility and access, such as the intersections of San Antonio Road with Middlefield Road and East Charleston Road.

Climate Resilience and Environmental Hazards
The Plan Area has some susceptibility to environmental challenges, including flooding, sea-level rise, urban heat events, and ground liquefication from seismic events. The portion of the Plan Area east of East Charleston Road is subject to a one percent annual chance flood and sea-level rise, while the rest of it faces a 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding. New development will need to meet base flood elevation standards and incorporate resilience measures. Air quality is another concern, particularly near US-101 and during regional wildfire events.

Potential Impacts on Services from Population Growth
Growth will place additional demands on public services and infrastructure. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) may require more staff, new equipment, and fire station upgrades. Overall school enrollment is down across all three school districts that service the Plan Area (Palo Alto Unified School District, Mountain View-Whisman School District, and Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District), indicating their capacity to absorb new students. The City owns and provides stormwater, wastewater, domestic water, recycled water, natural gas, and electrical utilities. Additional development could require upgrades to all these utilities, including installation of larger water mains to produce necessary fire flow and service levels.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
17 Packet Pg. 130 of 541

7 I. LAND USE AND ZONING
Existing Uses and Built Character
The City of Palo Alto’s Comprehensive Plan assigns a mix of residential and non-residential land use designations to the Plan Area. The San Antonio Road/Bayshore Corridor is an important employment center and has a variety of light industrial, research, and office
uses. Within the Plan Area, these uses are
concentrated mainly east of East
Charleston Road, transitioning to a mix of
commercial and residential uses west of
East Charleston, with some research and
office uses west of Middlefield Road.

Residential units within the Plan Area are
primarily low-rise multifamily buildings.

Existing building heights in the Plan Area
are predominantly one to two stories,
with a few buildings exceeding four
stories, such as those in the Taube Koret
Campus, and two hotels along San
Antonio Road. Floor Area Ratios (FARs)
range from 0.5 to 1.0, with a few buildings
such as the AC Hotel reaching a higher
FAR of 2.8. A built form analysis of the
Plan Area identified distinct character
areas, each with a unique mix of uses and
built form characteristics, as shown in
Figure 1.1. Across the Plan Area, parcel
sizes, building types, and development
patterns vary considerably, with little
consistency in setbacks, building
orientation, or scale transitions. By
contrast, the character areas are more
cohesive, with similar parcel sizes,
building scale and land uses.

Several developments along San Antonio
Road, such as the Greenhouse
Community, were designed to be inward
facing, with limited interaction between
building edges and adjacent streets or
sidewalks. Such inactive frontages
discourage pedestrian activity and
placemaking and may need to be
addressed as part of future development.

Figure 1.1. Existing Uses, Built Form and Character Areas Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Raimi and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
18 Packet Pg. 131 of 541

8 Regulatory Context and City Initiatives
Zoning districts within the Plan Area, as shown in Figure 1.2, allow a mix of residential, commercial, office, and light industrial uses. Development standards regulate the scale and form of buildings in each district. Most zoning districts in the Plan Area allow multifamily housing at various densities. The Plan Area also has a few Planned Communities with site-specific development standards.

Recent regulatory changes have
focused on encouraging more housing
City-wide, and the Plan Area in
particular. The City’s 2023-2031
Housing Element identified 53 housing
opportunity sites within the Plan Area,
with a combined capacity for 1,559 new
housing units at various income levels.

It also designated the GM and ROLM
zoning districts —areas that allow
manufacturing, office, and research
uses—within and adjoining the Plan
Area as “Focus Areas”, allowing
housing. The City’s Housing Incentive
Program (HIP) that applies to a section
of the Plan Area east of Middlefield
Road, was also expanded to include the
GM and ROLM Focus Areas, as well as
multifamily residential zoning districts
(RM-20, RM-30, and RM-40). In
addition, Program 6.6C of the 2023-
2031 Housing Element directs the City
to prepare a plan for the San Antonio
Road corridor, including the GM and
ROLM Focus Areas.

These initiatives aim to promote
multifamily housing through
development incentives such as
increased density, higher Floor Area
Ratios (FARs), and reduced parking
requirements.

In addition, a 24-foot Special Setback
applies to portions of Charleston Road,
Middlefield Road, and San Antonio
Road. Originally designated for future
road widening, this setback presents an
opportunity for public realm
improvements as part of future
development.

Figure 1.2. Zoning, Focus Areas and HIP Boundaries
Source: Raimi + Associates, City of Palo Alto GIS
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
19 Packet Pg. 132 of 541

9 Pipeline Projects
The Plan Area has attracted recent
development activity and there are
several projects at various stages of
proposal review and entitlement.

These include mid-rise residential and
mixed-use projects located along San
Antonio Road between East Charleston
Road and Middlefield Road (in the HIP
district), and along Fabian Way.

Figure 1.3 shows the large number of
2023-2031 Housing Element sites in
the Plan Area, along with key projects
currently in the development pipeline
(also listed in Table 1.1). In total, these
could yield more than 750 housing
units should all the development occur
as proposed. To be feasible in Palo
Alto’s housing market, future
development is anticipated to be larger
and taller than what exists currently; as
indicated by recent development
proposals that typically feature five- to
seven-story residential and mixed-use
buildings with FARs of 3.0 or more, and
parking ratios of fewer than two
parking spaces per unit.

Pipeline Project Lot Area Density, No. of Units FAR, Height Pkg Ratio Commercial Status

1. 3950 Fabian Way 1.51 ac None (school project) 0.5, 2 stories 0.12 None (school) Entitled

2. 3997 Fabian way 2.16 ac 135 du/ac, 295 units 3.19, 7 stories 1 to 1.5 None Pending approval

3. 824 San Antonio Rd. 0.45 ac 56 du/ac, 28 units 1.99, 4 stories 0.57 2,948 sf Entitled

4. 800,808 San Antonio Rd. 0.88 ac 85 du/ac, 75 units 3.0, 5 stories 1.97 None Entitled

5. 788 San Antonio Rd. 0.99 ac 169 du/ac, 168 units 3.31, 8 stories 0.43 None Building Permits Issued

6. 762 San Antonio Rd. 1.78 ac 112 du/ac, 197 units 3.33, 7 stories 1.24 None Pending approval Figure 1.3. Plan Area Pipeline Projects
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Raimi and Associates
Table 1.1. Plan Area Pipeline Projects
Source: City of Palo Alto
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
20 Packet Pg. 133 of 541

10 Outdoor Space and Placemaking Opportunities
Palo Alto has approximately 4,000 acres of open space (outdoor space), including the Baylands Nature Preserve, larger regional parks such as Mitchell Park (21 acres), smaller neighborhood parks such as Ramos Park (4 acres), community gardens, and other types of parks and recreation amenities. However, the Plan Area itself has no parks or other spaces for recreation or community gathering within it. Figure 1.4 shows parks and open spaces in the vicinity of the Plan Area, and pedestrian “walksheds” around each for 5-minute (approximately ¼ mile) and 10-minute (approximately ½ mile) walk distances. While most parts are within a 10-minute walkshed to neighboring parks, a significant portion is “park deficient” with inadequate access, meaning no parks are located within a 10-minute walking distance. Creating new open spaces, such as parks, as part of future development will be a key focus of the Area Plan. Placemaking and public realm improvements will also be important not only to improve safety and connectivity, but also to create distinct character districts along San Antonio Road that relate to the existing uses and functions of each segment. Figure 1.5 highlights potential focus areas for urban design improvements, as well as key streets and intersections where multimodal safety and connectivity improvements will be most critical.

Figure 1.4. Outdoor Space Access
Figure 1.5. Critical Areas of Safety and Mobility Focus Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Raimi and Associates
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Raimi and Associates
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
21 Packet Pg. 134 of 541

11 Key Findings and Conclusions
Key findings from the existing conditions analysis are summarized below.

DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES
• Location and Access. San Antonio Road is an important transportation corridor for Palo Alto and the surrounding region. The Plan Area has good auto access from US-101, and being located adjacent to the San Antonio Caltrain station offers the potential for enhanced transit connectivity if pedestrian and bicycle access to the station is improved. Located along the boundary between Palo Alto and Mountain View, the Plan Area is influenced by development trends and movement patterns in both cities and benefits from employment opportunities, as well as access to community and open space amenities, in both cities. • Existing Uses and Built Character. The Plan Area has a diverse mix of industrial, office, service commercial, and residential uses. While land use and built form patterns are currently fragmented, and San Antonio Road functions primarily as a circulation corridor; the Plan Area has distinct “character areas” with the potential to evolve into mixed-use neighborhoods. Several properties in the Plan Area are already transitioning from commercial and industrial uses to residential and mixed-use development. • Development Trends. The Plan Area has attracted development interest in recent years and has several proposed projects in the pipeline that could produce more than 750 housing units, should all these projects be built as proposed.
• Housing Initiatives. The City of Palo Alto’s 2023-2031 Housing Element identified 53 opportunity sites in the Plan Area, designated the GM- and ROLM-zoned districts within the Plan Area as Focus Areas, and directed the City through Program 6.6C to develop a plan for this area to stimulate housing production. Additionally, the City’s Housing Incentive Program (HIP) applies to a portion of the Plan Area. These housing-focused initiatives substantially increase the development capacity along San Antonio Road.

SITE CHALLENGES
• Inconsistent Character. Inconsistent land uses and built character in the Plan Area that exist currently are not supportive of the Plan Area’s envisioned transition to a mixed-use area with additional housing.

Substantial placemaking efforts, along with urban design and public realm improvements, may be needed to support future development and population growth.
• Inadequate Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Facilities. The current condition of streets and sidewalks is not friendly or accommodating for pedestrians and bicyclists, and transit connectivity is inadequate.

Comprehensive improvements are needed to ensure multimodal connectivity and safety to serve future residents, workers and visitors, and to meet the City’s mobility, sustainability, and housing goals. • Limited Community Amenities. The Plan Area itself has no parks, open spaces, or other “third places” for community gathering. A portion of the Plan Area is also “park deficient” by being more than a 10-minute walk (half a mile) from nearby open spaces. Additionally, the Plan Area has no defined retail nodes or similar community destinations. Creating such “third places” may be considered as part of the Area Plan. • Compatibility in Built Form and Uses. As the area transforms over time, incompatibility between adjacent land uses, as well as building height and massing transitions, must be addressed through updated development standards.
• Market Conditions. All pipeline projects are located on privately-owned properties and subject to housing market volatility and other development uncertainties. Successful implementation will require development incentives to encourage the provision of community amenities in private development projects.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
22 Packet Pg. 135 of 541

12 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES
The Plan Area’s characteristics and anticipated projects indicate a valuable opportunity to guide large-scale development in targeted locations within the Plan Area. Future development can be leveraged to create mixed- use neighborhoods with safe and convenient access to transportation, employment, community services, and recreation. To achieve this, placemaking
will be an important design tool, and will
likely include a combination of
streetscape improvements to promote
safety and walkability, as well as design
enhancements to create a distinct
identity for this neighborhood with a
strong sense of place. Figure 1.6 maps
key development opportunities within
the Plan Area by identifying areas with
the highest probability of transformation
— the potential “opportunity areas”
with projects that are in the
development pipeline, Housing Element
opportunity sites, and areas eligible for
the Housing Incentive Program (HIP).

An example of a potential opportunity
area is the E Charleston Commercial/
Industrial character area (area around
Commercial Street and Industrial
Avenue), which has good visibility and
auto access from East Charleston and
San Antonio Roads, and includes several
small-scale office and light industrial
uses. It also has a large concentration of
Housing Element sites within it, signaling
an increase in population in the coming
years. However, this area is also “park
deficient.” These characteristics suggest
potential priorities to consider as part of
future development: the need for
connectivity improvements, measures
to prevent displacement of
neighborhood-serving uses, and an
opportunity to create a new open
space, potentially coupled with
neighborhood-serving retail and
amenities.

Figure 1.6. Development Opportunities
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Raimi and Associates
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
23 Packet Pg. 136 of 541

13 2. HOUSING, GROWTH, AND DISPLACEMENT
RISK
Introduction
This section looks at current housing characteristics, potential residential displacement risks, and relevant City housing policies impacting the Area Plan. The findings of these analyses will help inform the City of Palo Alto’s efforts to increase affordable and market-rate housing production in the Plan Area, preserve existing affordable housing (including both deed-restricted affordable housing as well as market-rate housing that is not deed-restricted yet relatively affordable), and protect households vulnerable to displacement.

Data and findings in this section describe conditions within the “Plan Area Census Block Groups,” a set of Census block groups with existing housing that encompass the Plan Area, as shown in Figure 2.1. Since detailed U.S. Census data is only available for specific predetermined geographies, the selected block groups best cover the Plan Area while providing sufficient information for analysis. The analyses only cover the most recent available Census data since the block group boundaries differ from previous years.

Existing Housing Characteristics
The Plan Area has approximately 750 existing housing units, most of which are located on San Antonio Road west of East Charleston Road. This number represents approximately three percent of the City’s total housing stock.

These include two large concentrations of housing—Greenhouse Community (228 units) and Palo Alto Gardens (156 units)—that together make up just under half of the Plan Area’s existing housing. Three condominium communities, each with between 30 and 50 housing units, and a cluster of small apartment buildings (totaling approximately 40 units) on Byron Street are also located on or just off San Antonio Road. Housing along Alma Street contributes approximately 100 units to the Plan Area’s total, mostly as attached single-family housing units (as defined by the U.S. Census, whose classifications of housing types may differ from other sources such as the California Building Code and Palo Alto Municipal Code).

HOUSING TYPES
The Plan Area’s housing mix includes a significantly higher share of multifamily and attached single-family housing than in Palo Alto overall. These attached housing products provide housing comparably more affordable than detached single-family homes. As shown in Table 2.1, 39 percent of the Plan Area’s housing units are attached single-family homes (such as townhomes), compared to six percent Citywide. Small multifamily buildings with fewer than 20 housing units account for 54 percent of all housing in the Plan Area, compared to 16 percent Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Strategic Economics, 2025.

Figure 1.1. Plan Area Census Block Groups
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
24 Packet Pg. 137 of 541

14 Citywide. The majority of housing in the Plan Area consists of two- to three-story buildings dating to the 1970s, as most of the Plan Area was built-out from the 1950s through the 1980s. With two exceptions, the development of new housing projects largely ceased in the Plan Area after 1990. Based on recent zoning changes and recent patterns of redevelopment of industrial and commercial uses, the Plan Area is now positioned to accommodate significant new mid-rise housing development.

Table 2.1. Housing Units by Building Type
Plan Area Palo Alto Mountain View
Units by Building Type Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Single-Family (Detached) 4 0% 16,298 56% 10,516 27%
Single-Family (Attached) 312 39% 1,671 6% 5,378 14%
Multiple Units (2 Units) 0 0% 330 1% 694 2%
Multiple Units (2-19 Units) 430 54% 4,794 16% 8,607 22% Multiple Units (20+ Units) 56 7% 5,911 20% 12,340 32%
Mobile Home 0 0% 100 0% 1,235 3%
Total
(% may not sum due to rounding) 802 100% 29,104 100% 38,770 100%

AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The Plan Area has 252 deed-restricted affordable housing units that constitute over 30 percent of the Plan Area’s existing housing and equate to 15 percent of Palo Alto’s total deed-restricted affordable housing inventory. Of the Plan Area’s 252 affordable units, 80 consist of senior housing for residents 65 and older.

Residential Displacement Risk
Maintaining household income diversity and affordability in the Plan Area requires not only strategies to produce and preserve affordable housing, but also to protect lower-income residents from potential displacement risks.

Variables such as household tenure, income, and education help determine households’ displacement risk. The U.S. Census data representing the “Plan Area Census Block Groups” (Figure 2.1) was used for this analysis, and the conclusions drawn from the data were compared to findings from the Urban Displacement Project, a research project affiliated with the University of California at Berkeley, which models displacement risk at the Census tract level.

HOUSING TENURE
The Plan Area Census Block Groups include 766 renter-occupied housing units, 364 of which were built before 1960 and may be relatively affordable due to their age. Renter households do not constitute a relatively high share of occupied housing units in the Plan Area Census Block Groups, at 42.6 percent of occupied housing units, compared to 45.8 percent Citywide. However, the Plan Area’s more than 350 households occupy older rental housing units that may be relatively more affordable. Unlike ownership housing with fixed-rate mortgages and limited allowable property tax increases, renter households in Palo Alto are vulnerable to significant rent increases. Palo Alto lacks a rent control program, although some limits under the State’s California Tenant Protection Act apply to all cities which lack local rent control regulations. The Act limits annual rent increases for Source: U.S. Census, Strategic Economics, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
25 Packet Pg. 138 of 541

15 most rental housing units to five percent plus the change in the regional Consumer Price Index, or 10 percent total (whichever is lower).

HOUSING COST BURDEN
Cost-burdened households (those paying more than 30 percent of total household income toward housing expenses) are especially concentrated among lower-income renter households in Palo Alto. Although corresponding data is not available for the Plan Area, the 2023-2031 Housing Element indicated that 17 percent of the City’s renters and 15 percent of its homeowners were defined as cost-burdened as of 2018, and renters were more likely to experience cost burdens compared to homeowners. Nearly 65 percent of Palo Alto’s extremely low-income renter households were cost-burdened, with 42 percent paying more than half their income toward housing expenses. As shown in Figure 2.2, nearly 30 percent of households living in the Plan Area Census Block Groups earn household incomes of less than $100,000 per year and 13 percent of households earn less than $50,000 per year. Although some of these households may be served by existing deed-restricted affordable housing in the Plan Area, there are only 250 deed-restricted units in the Plan Area and approximately 525 households earning less than $100,000 in the Block Groups. For reference, a single-person household earning $111,700 qualifies as low-income based on Santa Clara County’s area median income limits used for affordable housing development.

Figure 2.2. Household Income, 2019-2023

HOUSEHOLD INCOME TRENDS
Median household income in the Plan Area Census Block Groups is $200,001, which is lower than that for Palo Alto as a whole ($220,408) but higher than that for Mountain View ($179,917). Between 2011 and 2021, median household incomes rose at a faster rate in Palo Alto (81 percent) and Mountain View (85 percent) than the regional increase of 74 percent for Santa Clara County and 77 percent for San Mateo County. Increasing household incomes in Palo Alto are driven by growth of very high-income households and declines in lower- and middle-income households—leading to increased displacement risk as lower-income households compete for housing with higher-income households. The number of these high-income households grew by 33 percent from 2000 to 2022 during a period when total households only grew by three percent. At the same time, households earning $60,000 to $100,000 declined by 66 percent, the largest loss among income groups. 0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Plan Area
(Block
Groups)
Palo Alto Mountain
View
Santa
Clara
County
San Mateo
County
Percent of Households
More than $200,000
$100,000-$199,999
$50,000 - $99,999
Less than $50,000
Source: U.S. Census, Strategic Economics, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
26 Packet Pg. 139 of 541

16 URBAN DISPLACEMENT PROJECT ANALYSIS
The Urban Displacement Project is a research lab and collaborative of four universities—including the University of California at Berkeley—that estimates displacement risk at the Census tract level. The Urban Displacement Project did not identify displacement risk for very low-income and low-income residents for any of the Census tracts in the Plan Area. However, this analysis does not address past exclusion, which is a form of displacement that impacts low-income renters’ ability to afford to live in a community. High housing costs, high household incomes, and high levels of educational attainment in Palo Alto make it especially difficult for lower-income households to afford market-rate rents and sales prices. The U.S. Census data that informs the Urban Displacement Project is also focused on housed residents and therefore does not account for unhoused residents in the Plan Area subject to displacement if, for example, regulatory changes force people living in vehicles to relocate. Furthermore, regardless of aggregated data findings, the risk of displacement can remain a concern at the level of the individual resident or household.

NATURALLY OCCURRING AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) refers to unsubsidized market-rate (and often rental) housing that is especially affordable to lower-income residents based on 30 percent of their annual household incomes. The relatively lower rents found in NOAH units are usually related to building age, condition, or location. NOAH properties are a means for lower-income residents to be able to live in otherwise unaffordable communities.

Although the Plan Area’s overall diversity of housing types provides relative affordability compared to single- family homes, few unsubsidized properties affordable to lower-income residents exist in the Plan Area overall.

However, approximately 40 units of multifamily rental housing on Byron Street potentially represent NOAH properties. The Plan Area also includes two examples of preservation of long-term affordability: Ferne Apartments, built in 1963, was converted into deed-restricted affordable housing in 1981 and is currently managed by the nonprofit Alta Housing. MidPen Housing acquired Palo Alto Gardens in 1999 after residents organized to protect the property from significant rent increases as market-rate property.

Housing Need and Policy

RHNA PROGRESS
The City of Palo Alto’s housing production goals are identified through the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), a State-wide process which breaks down housing production goals into income categories for eight-year cycles. The City’s 2023-2031 Housing Element plans for the production of 6,086 housing units between 2023 and 2031. The distribution of units across income groups reflects adopted City policy regarding Palo Alto’s overall housing needs during the current RHNA cycle. Palo Alto succeeded in meeting its previous RHNA cycle’s production goal in the above moderate-income category but fell short of production goals for all other lower- income groups. During the fifth RHNA cycle covering 2015 to 2023, the estimated need was highest for housing affordable to very low-income households. However, only 100 units meeting these affordability needs were proposed and approved, permitted, or built. Similarly, low- and moderate-income housing production fell short of the fifth cycle RHNA goals. Palo Alto’s current RHNA goals consist primarily of housing affordable to above moderate-income households and very low-income households.

The likely housing need by affordability level based on the mix of jobs and occupations found in Palo Alto closely aligns with current RHNA goals—reinforcing the need to produce housing that is affordable at a variety of income levels. The Plan Area also includes a significant share of jobs paying wages that would likely require deed- Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
27 Packet Pg. 140 of 541

17 restricted affordable housing for the worker household to reside in Palo Alto. For example, within the Plan Area itself, U.S. Census data from the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics data set indicates that approximately 16 percent of “primary” jobs (i.e., the highest-paying job held by a worker) in 2022 paid less than $40,000 annually.

Figure 2.3. 5th and 6th Cycle RHNA Goals and Progress, 2025

ROLE OF PLAN AREA IN MEETING HOUSING GOALS
The Plan Area was allocated 25 percent of the Citywide Opportunity Sites inventory capacity in the current RHNA cycle, while the area currently includes just 2.8 percent of Citywide housing units. Table 2.2 shows the 2023-2031 Housing Element sites inventory by income category. The Opportunity Sites inventory anticipates further housing production through redevelopment of existing older commercial and light industrial buildings, and most designated sites are concentrated east of Middlefield Road and west of US-101. No sites are located west of Middlefield Road, where many of the Plan Area’s existing housing units are located.

Table 2.2. Housing Element Units from Opportunity Sites

Lower-Income
(0-80% AMI)
Moderate-Income
(80-120% AMI)
Above Moderate-Income
(120%+ AMI) All Units
Total Percent Total Percent Total Percent Total Percent Plan Area 614 25% 332 33% 613 23% 1,559 26%
Other 1,838 75% 681 67% 2,008 77% 4,527 74%
Total 2,452 100% 1,013 100% 2,621 100% 6,086 100%

Source: U.S. Census, Strategic Economics, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
28 Packet Pg. 141 of 541

18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PLAN AREA
The City of Palo Alto has existing tools and policies for affordable housing production, the preservation of affordable housing, and protection of tenants. Tools focused on affordable housing production are most relevant to the Plan Area, given the number of sites identified as future Housing Opportunity Sites. The following are most relevant to the Plan Area:
• The City of Palo Alto’s Housing Incentive Program (HIP) provides incentives for housing development in the Plan Area that are coupled with contributions to affordable housing production. • The City also ensures that the overall supply of housing in the Plan Area will be sustained through its “no net loss” policy in which future redevelopment of existing housing stock must include at least as many units as are proposed for demolition.
• Other requirements linking affordable housing production or revenue contributions to new development will be especially relevant for ensuring the Plan Area remains a mixed-income community. • The City must consider the tradeoffs between immediately delivering affordable housing units in the Plan Area via an emphasis on inclusionary requirements (currently in place for ownership housing developments and via the HIP) versus providing fee resources (including via current impact fees applied to rental housing developments) for City contributions to more deeply affordable 100 percent affordable projects. • The Plan Area presents opportunities to leverage the City’s existing affordable housing resources to support the development of 100 percent affordable housing projects if the City can acquire sites or partner with developers seeking master plan development agreements for large properties. • The Plan Area’s ability to compete for outside affordable housing funding varies by location. The California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) define the Plan Area as representing “highest resource” and “high resource” areas. This designation improves the Plan Area’s ability to score and compete for critical funding sources such as Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) and other State resources. However, most large, underutilized sites best positioned for cost-efficient housing development in the Plan Area are located outside the half-mile radius of robust transit access at the Caltrain station, which reduces the area’s ability to compete for funding sources tied to transit and reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. • The City’s support for the Homekey Palo Alto project (at 1237 North San Antonio Road), currently under construction, helps achieve the City’s homelessness services and alternative housing program goals. The project is an example of leveraging City funds to provide diverse housing options in the Plan Area.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
29 Packet Pg. 142 of 541

19 Key Findings and Conclusions
The findings of these analyses will help inform the City of Palo Alto’s efforts to increase affordable and market- rate housing production in the Plan Area, preserve existing affordable housing, and protect households vulnerable to displacement. Key conclusions are summarized below.
• Few new housing projects have been built in the Plan Area since the 1980s. Housing in the Plan Area largely consists of two- to three-story condominium and rental multifamily buildings built from the 1950s through the 1980s, except for assisted living housing built at the Taube Koret Campus in 2010 and affordable housing units at the Alta Torre senior affordable housing project. The Plan Area’s 802 housing units constitute approximately 2.8 percent of Palo Alto’s 29,104 units.
• The Plan Area’s existing housing helps in meeting Palo Alto’s affordable housing needs, with approximately 250 deed-restricted affordable housing units at four properties. • A limited quantity of relatively affordable market-rate rental housing—known as “naturally-occurring affordable housing,” or “NOAH”—exists within the Plan Area at properties along Byron Street. NOAH units can potentially represent future opportunities for conversion to deed-restricted affordable housing as part of a strategy to preserve existing relatively affordable housing. An example of this occurred in the Plan Area at Palo Alto Gardens in 1999.
• Although modeling by the UC Berkeley Urban Displacement Project does not indicate a significant risk of displacement for low-income renter households in and near the Plan Area, City tenant protection policies can play a role in supporting the nearly 40 percent of households that are renters in and near the Plan Area. • The addition of housing in the Plan Area that is affordable to households with diverse income levels can help meet the needs of workers at jobs in Palo Alto and the Plan Area itself. Wages associated with the industry sector mix of jobs in Palo Alto suggest that 35 percent of worker households may qualify as low- or very low- income and would benefit from deed-restricted affordable housing in the City. This share is similar to the assigned RHNA targets the City is seeking to achieve as part of its current Housing Element of the Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan.
• Within the Plan Area, U.S. Census data indicates that approximately 16 percent of “primary” jobs (i.e., the highest-paying job held by a worker) in 2022 paid less than $40,000 annually. • Given the number and magnitude of sites identified as future Housing Opportunity Sites within it, the Plan Area is especially well-positioned to expand its role in meeting the housing needs of lower-income households. This can be achieved through application of inclusionary housing policies and affordable housing fee payments in conjunction with future housing development, and through production of deed- restricted 100 percent affordable housing developments.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
30 Packet Pg. 143 of 541

20 3. TRANSPORTATION AND MOBILITY
Introduction
The transportation network studied for the Plan Area consists of roadways, pedestrian facilities, bicycle facilities, and transit facilities, as well as the suggested walk and roll routes from the City’s Safe Routes to School Program.

Road Network
Roads within the Plan Area and its
vicinity can be categorized into three
classifications: arterial, collector, and
local, shown in Figure 3.1. Posted speed
limits within the Plan Area range from
25 to 45 miles per hour (mph). The Plan
Area includes a network of designated
truck routes including US-101
(Bayshore Freeway), San Antonio Road,
Alma Street, Fabian Way, and East and
West Bayshore Roads. San Antonio
Road is classified as a critical east-west
arterial and truck route providing
access to key employment centers, and
has a speed limit of 35 mph. There are
six signalized intersections within the
Plan Area, and major crossings include
Alma Street, Middlefield Road, East
Charleston Road, and US-101. From
Alma Street to East Charleston Road,
the roadway features a divided four-
lane cross-section, that transitions to a
three-lane undivided cross-section east
of East Charleston Road, and narrows
to a two-lane cross-section as it
approaches and crosses US-101.

TRAFFIC COUNTS
Vehicle, truck, bicyclist, and pedestrian
counts were collected at 25
intersections for the weekday AM
(7:00–10:00 AM) and PM (4:00–7:00
PM) peak periods. The data was
collected on three separate weekdays:

Thursday May 15, Wednesday May 21,
Figure 3.1. Roadway Classification
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
31 Packet Pg. 144 of 541

21 and Tuesday May 27, 2025. It is worth noting that one of the count days (May 15, 2026) coincided with Bike-to- Work Day, which may have influenced bicyclist volumes. For each intersection, the peak hour was determined based on the highest observed total vehicle volume within the respective time window. PM peak hour volumes were higher at each intersection. Figure 3.2 summarizes PM peak hour volumes at each intersection.

Figure 3.2. PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes by Intersection

Source: Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
32 Packet Pg. 145 of 541

22 TRAFFIC SPEEDS
Table 3.1 shows Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data collected over a 72-hour period along San Antonio Road between Alma Street and Casey Avenue, including vehicle speeds and volumes. The highest observed 85th percentile speed was on the segment between East Charleston Road and US-101, indicating an increase as vehicles approach the highway. The lowest speeds are recorded on the segment between Bayshore Road and Casey Avenue, aligned with the change in cross-section to two undivided lanes in this segment. A notable percentage of high-speed vehicles was observed along San Antonio Road. On the segment between East Charleston Road and US-101, around one-third of vehicles exceed 40 mph where the posted speed limit is 35 mph. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes remain within a similar range along Alma Street to US-101, with eastbound volumes ranging from 10,410 to 11,916 and generally higher westbound volumes between 11,559 and 17,593.

Table 3.1. Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Speed Surveys

Roadway Segment
85th Percentile Speed
(mph) Vehicles > 40mph (%) ADT
Eastbound Westbound Eastbound Westbound Eastbound Westbound San Antonio Road between East
Charleston Road and US-101
44 43 35 33 11,779 17,593
San Antonio Road between Middlefield
Road and East Charleston Road
35 38 5 10 10,410 11,559
San Antonio Road between Alma Street
and Middlefield Road
40 40 17 15 11,916 17,368
San Antonio Road between Bayshore
Road and Casey Avenue
29 28 0 0 1,390 1,511

Source: Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
33 Packet Pg. 146 of 541

23 Bicycle Network
The City of Palo Alto has developed a
robust bike network with a mix of
bicycle boulevards, bike lanes,
separated bikeways, and trails; but
the Plan Area lacks a fully connected
bicycle network.

There are currently no continuous
bicycle facilities on San Antonio
Road. A bike route is present
between Middlefield Road and
Charleston Road. Fabian Way has a
bike lane from East Bayshore Road,
which discontinues near the
intersection with East Charleston
Road. The only continuous north-
south bikeways are found on East
Charleston Road, which includes
both standard and buffered bike
lanes on both sides of the roadway.

Middlefield Road provides a short
segment of bike lane south of San
Antonio Road on the west side of the
roadway.

The pedestrian and bicycle bridge
that crosses US-101 provides a
grade-separated facility that enables
uninterrupted crossing for people
walking, biking, and rolling across the
highway barrier. Overall, the limited
presence of bike facilities, combined
with high vehicle speeds and
volumes, contributes to conditions
that are not conducive to bicycle
travel. Figure 3.3 illustrates the
existing bicycle facilities.

Figure 3.3. Existing Bicycle Facilities
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
34 Packet Pg. 147 of 541

24 BICYCLE LEVEL OF COMFORT
Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) is an evaluation that quantifies the amount of discomfort that people feel when bicycling based on attributes such as vehicle speed, vehicle volume, number of lanes, bicycle lane blockage, presence of on-street parking, and ease of intersection crossing. There are four LTS ratings (LTS 1 through LTS 4).

The higher the LTS, the higher the
expected discomfort for the rider
traveling along the facility. Figure 3.4
illustrates the Segment Bicycle LTS
analysis from the City of Palo Alto’s
Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation
Plan (BPTP) Update (in progress).

Based on the BPTP Update, the Plan
Area exhibits generally high levels of
bicycle traffic stress. While most
minor streets are classified as LTS 1
(low traffic stress), most major
corridors are rated LTS 3 or LTS 4. The
most stressful segments in the Plan
Area are located along Alma Street
and San Antonio Road (both LTS 4),
Middlefield Road, East Charleston
Road, Fabian Way, and Bayshore
Road (all LTS 3).

Among the intersections in the Plan
Area, six are signalized and are
assigned LTS 1, as traffic signals
provide dedicated crossing time for
cyclists. The other low-stress
intersections are typically along
residential streets with lower speeds
and minimal vehicular activity. Many
high-stress intersections are found
along Alma Street, San Antonio Road,
Middlefield Road, East Charleston
Road, and Fabian Way, consistent
with the high-stress classifications of
these corridors. San Antonio Road
features 12 intersections in the Plan
Area, of which five are rated LTS 4
and one is rated LTS 3.

Figure 3.4. Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
35 Packet Pg. 148 of 541

25 MAJOR BARRIERS
The BPTP Update identified three
primary linear barriers within and
connecting to the Plan Area: US-101,
the Caltrain rail corridor, and the
waterway near Fabian Way and
Bayshore Road. The most critical
connectivity gap lies between Adobe
Creek and Embarcadero Road
pedestrian and bicycle bridges, which
limits access to the Adobe Creek Loop
Trail and adjacent destinations. Within
the Plan Area, the San Antonio
Caltrain Station provides a pedestrian
and bicycle crossing over the rail
corridor, improving connectivity
across this barrier. Barriers near
transit also occur at San Antonio Road,
where the absence of continuous
sidewalks along certain segments
limits direct pedestrian and bicyclist
access to transit.

Pedestrian
Network
Figure 3.5 shows pedestrian facilities
in the Plan Area. Sidewalks are largely
continuous, with most streets in the
Plan Area providing sidewalks
approximately four to five feet wide
on both sides of the roadway. While
this width meets minimum standards
in many residential contexts, it may be
inadequate for higher pedestrian
volumes, accessibility needs, or areas
with high levels of adjacent traffic. In
some areas, sidewalks are separated
from the roadway by landscaped strips
and tree coverage, which help buffer pedestrians from vehicle traffic. However, notable gaps exist in certain locations. The Plan Area’s six signalized intersections are equipped with standard marked crosswalks, ADA ramps, and pedestrian-activated countdown signal heads, with each intersection providing at least one crosswalk and corresponding pedestrian signal. The Plan Area features pedestrian safety treatments such as mid-block crossings, a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and refuge islands. Within the Plan Area, San Antonio Road does not provide continuous pedestrian or bicycle crossings over US-101.

Figure 3.5. Pedestrian Facilities
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
36 Packet Pg. 149 of 541

26 Transit Services
The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) operates bus services within Palo Alto. Key features of existing transit services in the Plan Area include:
• There are currently five bus stops located along San Antonio Road, four bus stops along Fabian Way, and two bus stops along East Charleston Road. None of the associated services are classified as high frequency. • VTA Route 21 travels twice an hour from the Stanford Shopping Center to the Santa Clara Transit Center via the Mountain View Transit Center. The route runs along San Antonio Road between Alma Street and Middlefield Road, with stops at Middlefield Road and at Nita Road and San Antonio Court. • VTA Route 288 is a school-day-only tripper route with one daily service to and from Gunn High School. It operates along East Charleston Road and Fabian Way, before continuing west on Meadow Drive and Arastradero Road toward Gunn High School.
• ACE Orange Route provides four daily commuter shuttle service between Meadow Drive and Meadow Circle, east of the Plan Area, and the Great America ACE/Amtrak Station, including stops at Fabian Way and East Meadow Drive, Fabian Way and East Charleston Road, and San Antonio Road and Casey Avenue within the Plan Area.
• MVgo Routes D and C operate along San Antonio Road, connecting Mountain View employment centers with Caltrain and light rail stations. However, these routes do not stop within Palo Alto. • Palo Alto Link, an on-demand rideshare service, also provides point-to-point service to popular destinations throughout the City.
• Located just outside the Plan Area boundary, the San Antonio Caltrain Station, a regional commuter rail system operated by the Peninsula Joint Powers Board, provides service at 15- or 30-minute headways (depending on peak or off-peak times) between San Francisco and San Jose, with additional service as far as Gilroy. Caltrain recently completed electrification of its right-of-way between San Francisco and San Jose, improving service frequency and speeds. A large portion of the plan area is located within a half mile walk, and the entire plan area is within a 2-mile bicycle ride, of San Antonio Caltrain station. • Future plans for California’s High-Speed Rail include a proposed four-track segment through Palo Alto for high-speed train service alongside Caltrain.

Safety
An assessment of reported crashes was conducted using the latest 10 years of the University of California, Berkeley's Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) data (2015 to 2024). A total of 143 crashes occurred in the Plan Area over the past 10 years, including two fatal and three severe injury crashes. One fatal crash occurred at the intersection of Commercial Street and Charleston Road, and another near the intersection of San Antonio Road and Nita Avenue. Throughout the 10-year review period, a total of five pedestrian and 15 bicycle crashes were reported in the Plan Area. Among the pedestrian crashes, one crash was fatal, and one resulted in a severe injury. For bicycle-involved crashes, one crash resulted in a severe injury, and 11 crashes involved visible injuries.

No bicycle crashes were fatal.

Most collisions occurred along key access points and intersections along San Antonio Road including Charleston Street, Middlefield Road, and Alma Street. Approximately 30 percent of the reported crashes occurred along Fabian Way. Primary collision factors among fatal crashes were unsafe speeds and pedestrian right-of-way Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
37 Packet Pg. 150 of 541

27 violations. For severe injury crashes, the leading factors were unsafe speed, driving or cycling under the influence (DUI), and traffic signal and sign violations.

HIGH-INJURY LOCATIONS
The Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Safety Action
Plan identified a High-Injury Network (HIN)
composed of corridors with a
disproportionate share of fatalities and
severe injuries between 2018 and 2022.

These corridors were prioritized for safety
interventions as part of the City’s
commitment to Vision Zero and the Safe
System Approach. The SS4A Safety Action
Plan includes San Antonio Road from Alma
Street to East Charleston Road, Middlefield
Road from San Antonio Road to Lytton
Avenue, and East Charleston Road from San
Antonio Road to Los Palos Avenue.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS
The local Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
Partnership between the City, the Palo Alto
Unified School District (PAUSD), and the Palo
Alto Council of PTAs (PTAC) works to reduce
risk to students in routes to and from school
and encourages more families to choose
alternatives to driving solo more often.

Within the Plan Area, the Palo Alto SRTS
program has identified suggested walking
routes on San Antonio Road and Middlefield
Road, while Fabian Way and East Charleston
Road include segments designated for both
walking and biking. Greendell School, a
public PAUSD site, is located near these
suggested routes and is included in the City’s
SRTS Walk and Roll Map program. Other
private schools in the Plan Area are located
near suggested corridors; however, these
schools are not formally evaluated by the SRTS program. Private institutions may choose to reference existing Walk and Roll Maps and develop their own recommended routes.

PARKING
Both on-street and off-street parking is permitted throughout the Plan Area. San Antonio Road has a total of 145 on-street parking spaces, Fabian Way has 135 total spaces, and most residential streets also allow on-street parking. In the Plan Area, bicycle parking appears to be insufficient overall, with limited availability near public Figure 3.6. Crash Severity
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, Kittelson and Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
38 Packet Pg. 151 of 541

28 spaces, intersections, and key pedestrian corridors. The distribution of bicycle racks is concentrated in the eastern portion of the corridor near dense commercial areas, while significant gaps exist along the western segment of San Antonio Road.

Key Findings and Conclusions
Key findings, challenges and opportunities for transportation and mobility are identified in the following list.

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN NETWORKS
• The Plan Area includes key destinations within a walking, biking or rolling distance, such as Ramos Park, Cubberley Community Center, San Antonio Caltrain Station, and nine public and private schools. • Existing bicycle facilities are limited along San Antonio Road, with only a short bike route present between Middlefield Road and East Charleston Road.
• Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) analysis identifies segments on San Antonio Road, Alma Street, and Middlefield Road that are particularly uncomfortable and have the highest LTS rating of 4. • There are gaps in the existing pedestrian network where the absence of continuous sidewalks limits direct access to key destinations. Existing pedestrian facilities are present along most segments of San Antonio Road, but key gaps exist near the Bayshore Freeway interchange and between Nita Avenue and Alma Street.

TRANSIT SERVICES
• VTA Route 21 provides public transit access at 30-minute headways along a short segment of San Antonio Road between Alma Street and Middlefield Road, with the highest weekday ridership activity observed at the Middlefield Road stop. No other active bus routes currently operate within the Plan Area. • A large portion of the plan area is also within a half-mile walk, and the entire plan area is within a 2-mile bicycle ride, of San Antonio Caltrain station, which provides regional transit access between San Francisco and San Jose.

SAFETY
• The City’s Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program identifies suggested walking routes on San Antonio and Middlefield Roads, and shared walking/biking routes on Fabian Way and Charleston Road. Public schools like Greendell are formally included, while private schools may reference the City’s Walk and Roll Maps to develop their own routes.
• Vehicle volumes are highest at the intersection of San Antonio Road and Middlefield Road with 3,741 cars observed between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM and 4,391 observed between 4:55 PM and 5:55 PM. A total of 88 trucks were counted at this location during the weekday AM peak hour and 40 trucks were counted during the weekday PM peak hour, or 2.3 percent and 0.9 percent respectively. • Truck volumes are generally higher during the morning and are consistently higher near US-101 ramps, where trucks made up 95 of the 2,411 vehicles, or 3.9 percent of the vehicle traffic at that location during the weekday AM peak hour (which occurred between 8:05 AM and 9:05 AM). • Speed surveys show that 85th percentile speeds exceed the posted 35 mph limit on multiple segments of San Antonio Road, particularly between East Charleston Road and US-101, where nearly one-third of vehicles travel above 40 mph.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
39 Packet Pg. 152 of 541

29 • San Antonio Road has a total of 145 on-street parking spaces. Bicycle parking is limited and unevenly distributed, particularly along the western portion of San Antonio Road. • Over the last 10 years, 143 crashes were reported in the Plan Area, including two fatal and three severe injury crashes. 14 percent of reported crashes involved pedestrians or bicyclists. The most common primary collision factor was unsafe speed, accounting for 34 percent of the reported crashes and many of the fatal and severe injury crashes.
• The City of Palo Alto’s Safe Streets for All Safety Action Plan (2025) identifies San Antonio Road, from Alma Street to East Charleston Road, as part of the City’s High Injury Network based on its crash history and collision severity.
• The City of Palo Alto’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan Update (in progress) and City of Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (2012) propose redesigning San Antonio Road as part of the San Antonio Road Area Plan to accommodate anticipated housing growth along and near the corridor as well as continued development and improvement of the San Antonio Caltrain Station as an important transportation node for the City.
• City of Palo Alto Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Plan (BPTP) Update (in progress) recommends the following improvements:
o Class I shared use path along San Antonio Road from East Charleston Road to Terminal Boulevard, o Class IV separated bikeways on San Antonio Road between Alma Street and East Charleston Road, on Charleston Road within City limits, and on Alma Street from Meadow Drive to San Antonio Avenue, o Class IIb buffered bikeway on Fabian Way from Meadow Drive to East Charleston Road, and o Class IIIb bicycle boulevard on Mackay Drive, continuing along Shasta Drive and Nelson Drive.

The existing conditions assessment for the San Antonio Road corridor identifies several critical challenges that limit safe and equitable multimodal access to key destinations. The issues include the lack of continuous and protected bicycle infrastructure along San Antonio Road, which is classified as high stress (LTS 4) and creates a major barrier to travel. Sidewalk gaps, minimal landscaping buffers, and long crossings and block lengths further hinder pedestrian comfort and accessibility. Driver speeding is prevalent, with 85th percentile speeds exceeding posted limits on multiple segments, and crash data reveal a history of severe and fatal collisions involving pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists. Transit service is minimal, with only two active VTA routes (route 21 and ACE Orange Mountain View Shuttle) and no operating school or shuttle services. Finally, the shortage and poor distribution of public bike parking undermines the potential for short local bike trips and first/last mile connectivity.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
40 Packet Pg. 153 of 541

30 4. MARKET AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Introduction
The primary relevant local market for the Plan Area includes the cities of Palo Alto and Mountain View, with the regional area consisting of Santa Clara County and San Mateo County.

Figure 4.1 shows the census block groups used for the Plan Area analysis of demographic and household trends. Since detailed U.S. Census data is only available for specific predetermined geographies, the selected block groups best cover the Plan Area while providing information for analysis.

DEMOGRAPHIC AND HOUSEHOLD TRENDS
The Plan Area Census Block Groups have a higher presence of families with children, slightly lower median household income, and a more diverse population than Palo Alto.
• Population. As of 2021, the Plan Area Census Block
Groups had 4,975 people (7 percent of Palo Alto’s
population), in 1,798 households (7 percent of Palo
Alto’s households).
• Median Household Income. The Plan Area Census Block
Groups’ median income of $200,001 is lower than that of Palo Alto ($220,408) and higher than Mountain View
($179,917). Median household income in Palo Alto
increased by 81 percent from 2011 to 2021, driven by increases in high-income households, and losses of middle- and lower-income households.
• Household Characteristics. Average household sizes in Mountain View and Palo Alto are much smaller than in Santa Clara County and San Mateo County overall. Figure 4.2 shows details of household types. • Race and Ethnicity. Palo Alto and Mountain View are less racially and ethnically diverse than Santa Clara County and San Mateo County overall. Compared to Palo Alto, the ratio of Non-Hispanic Black residents to the total population is higher for the Plan Area at 11 percent, compared to 2 percent for the City.

38% 33% 27% 33% 31%
37%
35%
27%
37% 38%
17% 25%
33%
22% 24%
9% 7% 13% 8% 8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Plan Area
Census
Block
Groups
Palo Alto Mountain
View
Santa Clara
County
San Mateo
County
Percentage of Households
Other Non-Family Household
Householder Living Alone
Families without Children
Families with Children
Figure 4.2. Household Types,
2019-2023
Source: U.S. Census, American
Community Survey, 5-year Estimate,
2019-2023; Strategic Economics, 2025.

Figure 4.1. Plan Area Census Block Groups
Source: U.S. Census, Strategic Economics, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
41 Packet Pg. 154 of 541

31 Housing Market Conditions

EXISTING HOUSING SUPPLY
Analysis of the Plan Area’s existing housing supply including Key Findings is described in Section 2, “Housing, Growth, and Displacement Risk” of this report.

HOUSING MARKET POTENTIAL AND TRENDS
Palo Alto home sales prices are significantly higher than those for neighboring cities and the County. In 2025, the median single-family home value in Palo Alto was $3.69 million, 76 percent higher than Mountain View ($2.09 million), 94 percent higher than Santa Clara County ($1.73 million), and 99 percent higher than San Mateo County ($1.61 million). Between 2015 and 2025, single-family home values increased by 43 percent in Palo Alto and 62 percent in Mountain View. Condominiums are relatively more affordable but still significantly more expensive than surrounding areas. Palo Alto’s average effective rents per square foot increased by nearly 18 percent from 2015 to 2025, similar to Mountain View. High absorption and low vacancy rates for multifamily rental housing in Palo Alto and Mountain View indicate strong demand for this product type. Recent developments have been trending towards multifamily housing as well, as shown in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1. Permitted Housing Units by Building Type, 2018-2024 Number Percent

Single-
Family ADU Multi-
family Total Single-
Family ADU Multi-
family
Local Market Area 813 825 5,177 6,815 12% 12% 76%
Palo Alto 15 574 363 952 2% 60% 38%
Mountain View 798 251 4,814 5,863 14% 4% 82%
Regional Market Area 8,533 10,393 46,233 65,159 13% 16% 71% Santa Clara County 7,209 7,294 36,611 51,114 14% 14% 72% San Mateo County 1,324 3,099 9,622 14,045 9% 22% 69%
Notes: “ADU”s are accessory dwelling units, which are accessory to a single-family home or other residential structure. 14 manufactured units were also permitted in Santa Clara County during this period.

Source. California Department of Housing and Community Development Annual Progress Reports, Table A2, 2018-2024; Strategic Economics, 2025.

The Plan Area benefits from a variety of indicators that suggest strong ongoing demand for new housing: high- performing housing markets in Palo Alto and Mountain View, demographic trends suggesting demand from senior and working-age adult households; and recent developer interest, with pipeline projects potentially adding 750 new housing units to the Plan Area. Regional forecasts anticipate housing growth translating to an average of 974 housing units per year for Palo Alto and Mountain View combined. Given this strong demand, available development opportunities, and its access to jobs, the Plan Area is well-positioned to capture projected demand for additional housing units.

The Plan Area is most likely to attract development of mid-rise multifamily rental housing products, which are most compatible with the Plan Area’s existing built environment of light industrial sites positioned for Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
42 Packet Pg. 155 of 541

32 redevelopment, patterns of development in nearby areas of Mountain View at similar sites, and the City of Palo Alto’s regulatory and policy priorities focused on promoting higher-density development in the Plan Area.

Developers interviewed shared that ideal sites for cost-efficient mid-rise housing development are rectangular or square, allow multiple access points, are at least one to two acres in size, are relatively underutilized (typically vacant or with light industrial uses), and located near existing or future transportation access and retail amenities.

Retail Market Conditions and Trends

EXISTING RETAIL
The Plan Area currently has a small retail inventory consisting of approximately 69,000 square feet of retail space concentrated around the intersections of San Antonio Road at East Charleston Road and Middlefield Road. This includes 38,000 square feet of automobile-oriented retail and one car dealership (28,000 square feet) that is currently for sale. Other uses include small stores and quick-serve restaurants. The Plan Area is within the service radius of regional retail centers such as Stanford Shopping Center and Town & Country Village in Palo Alto, San Antonio Center in Mountain View, and retail centers near El Camino Real. Other retail centers in the vicinity include the Rengstorff Center and two grocery-anchored neighborhood shopping centers along Middlefield Road in Palo Alto and Mountain View. The Plan Area is reasonably well covered by the trade areas of existing food stores, including two supermarkets (Joya Supermarket and Piazza’s Fine Foods), a specialty food store (Crossroads), Costco in Mountain View, and multiple grocery stores west of the Plan Area at and near San Antonio Center. These existing retail uses can serve the Plan Area’s near-term needs. The eastern portion of the Plan Area has lower access to grocery stores than other parts.

The City of Palo Alto has a policy priority to preserve existing retail, which is enacted through the Retail Preservation Ordinance (RPO). The RPO generally requires replacement of existing ground floor retail. However, specific requirements vary by location in the City and project type. Under State Law, the RPO does not apply at sites included in Palo Alto’s 2023-2031 Housing Element sites inventory, and the replacement requirement is limited to 1,500 square feet for housing projects with densities of 30 or more dwelling units per acre.

RETAIL MARKET POTENTIAL AND TRENDS
The analysis for potential retail development in the Plan Area is based on current market conditions and competitive retail supply in the surrounding trade area, interviews with local retail brokers, and examining pipeline projects. As the Plan Area adds more households, it is best positioned to attract neighborhood-serving retail that typically has a service radius of one to three miles. These can include dining, personal services, and potentially future grocery stores and drug stores, with each new household generating a demand for approximately 34 square feet of new retail space. Local retail brokers interviewed noted that the most desirable retail locations in the Plan Area are at the intersections of Middlefield Road and San Antonio Road, and East Charleston Road and San Antonio Road, due to visibility from large quantities of through traffic and accessibility from existing residents and new residents at proposed housing projects.

Future retail development in the Plan Area is anticipated to follow recent trends in the area, that consist of small quantities of ground floor retail in mixed-use development projects or expansions and modernizations of existing major shopping centers.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
43 Packet Pg. 156 of 541

33 Employment Profile and Trends

EMPLOYMENT IN THE PLAN AREA
Most jobs in the Plan Area today are in the manufacturing sector, accounting for 43 percent of total Plan Area employment, with Maxar as a major employer. As of 2022, the Plan Area had 40 percent of Palo Alto’s Manufacturing sector jobs, and 36 percent of the City’s construction jobs. Between 2012 to 2022, the Plan Area lost a large number of manufacturing jobs and gained jobs in other sectors, with health care as the largest sector.

Employment trends are shown in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2. Percent Change in Employment in Plan Area, 2012-2022.

Industry 2012 2022 Change (Number) Change (%)
Manufacturing 3,788 2,043 -1745 -46%
Other 764 722 -42 -5%
Professional, Scientific, and Technical
Services 481 640 159 33%
Health Care and Social Assistance 184 564 380 207%
Retail Trade 184 360 176 96%
Construction 209 315 106 51%
Information 130 52 -78 -60%
Total 5,740 4,696 -1044 -18%
Source. U.S. Census, LEHD OnTheMap, 2022; Strategic Economics, 2025.

EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
Jobs in the Plan Area today include a larger share of opportunities for workers with lower levels of educational attainment compared to jobs in Palo Alto overall. The Information and Professional, Scientific and Technical Services industry sectors are associated with very high average wages, but also high education, training, and skill requirements. In contrast, the Manufacturing and Construction industry sectors typically include a larger share of middle-skill, middle-wage jobs. Development of new housing in the Plan Area is likely to primarily occur at properties with these types of existing employment, such as the small office and light industrial spaces near Commercial Street and Industrial Avenue.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
44 Packet Pg. 157 of 541

34 Key Findings and Conclusions

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS FINDINGS
• Robust demand for a variety of housing products exists in the Plan Area and surrounding market area, as indicated by relatively high sales prices for ownership housing, relatively high achievable rents, and low residential vacancy rates.
• Given strong demand for housing in Palo Alto and the available housing development opportunities within the Plan Area, the area is well-positioned to capture demand for additional housing units associated with projected household and employment growth, as forecasted by the Association of Bay Area Governments for Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties. • Despite demand for a range of housing products in Palo Alto—including lower-density ownership housing such as luxury townhomes—the Plan Area is most likely to attract development of mid-rise multifamily housing products. These products are most compatible with the City of Palo Alto’s regulatory and policy priorities focused on promoting higher density development in the Plan Area. • Recent housing development proposals in the Plan Area demonstrate developer interest in mid-rise, relatively higher-density housing products. Housing development proposals in and near the Plan Area primarily consist of buildings that are most often seven to eight stories tall and with densities ranging from 110 to 170 dwelling units per acre.
• The likelihood and timing of housing development on specific sites in the Plan Area will depend on site characteristics, existing uses, and location. Ideal sites for cost-efficient mid-rise housing development are rectangular or square, allow multiple access points, are at least one to two acres in size, are relatively underutilized (typically vacant or with light industrial uses), and located near existing or future transportation access and retail amenities. Developers can assemble smaller sites to create a site with these characteristics, but parcel assembly takes time and adds development risk. • Improvements to local amenities, the pedestrian environment, and multimodal transportation options can support the attractiveness of the Plan Area for future residents and potentially accelerate housing development activity.

RETAIL MARKET ANALYSIS FINDINGS
• Existing retail offerings (with “retail” inclusive of shopping, dining, services, and entertainment) are limited within the Plan Area. However, much of the area is located within a half mile of existing neighborhood and community shopping centers that can meet many day-to-day shopping needs for existing residents and residents of any early future housing developments. • The best performing retail locations near the Plan Area are primarily closer to El Camino Real, with retail brokers noting that the Plan Area itself is more likely to serve as a secondary retail location that is better suited to supporting neighborhood-serving retail—such as dining, personal services, and potentially future grocery stores and drug stores—rather than major regional shopping destinations. The San Antonio Center adjacent to the Plan Area functions as a larger regional retail center that can serve current and future households in the Plan Area.
• Over time, additions of new residents in the Plan Area will generate demand for additional local retail space to accommodate dining, services, and day-to-day shopping needs. The total magnitude of supportable retail space will vary depending on the projected buildout of housing units in the Plan Area.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
45 Packet Pg. 158 of 541

35 • Given the likely incremental process of housing development in the Plan Area, retail demand is likely to grow gradually and take time to achieve a critical mass of residents to support significant new retail amenities such as a new grocery store. Existing nearby retail amenities will largely meet demand from early residential growth, and early retail opportunities within the Plan Area will primarily consist of dining and personal services.
• New retail space is likely to best perform in Plan Area locations that are near areas of future housing growth, visible and readily accessible from higher-traffic streets, and allow for a concentration of retail tenants. Real estate brokers interviewed for this study noted that the intersection of Middlefield Road and San Antonio Road is likely to be a desirable retail location within the Plan Area due to visibility from large quantities of pass-through traffic and accessibility from existing residents and new residents at proposed housing projects to the east. Locations along East Charleston Road and San Antonio Road near the intersection of these streets also benefit from visibility and access.
• Given the gradual pace of housing buildout to achieve a critical mass of residents to support larger quantities of new retail space, the San Antonio Road Area Plan will need to incorporate a vision and policies to ensure development of retail space at preferred future retail concentrations.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FINDINGS
• Although the Plan Area constitutes a relatively small share of jobs in Palo Alto overall, the area includes a notable concentration of manufacturing jobs. The U.S. Census estimates that the Plan Area included approximately 4.3 percent of jobs in Palo Alto as of 2022, but nearly 40 percent of jobs classified in the Manufacturing industry sector. The Plan Area includes major employers such as Maxar along Fabian Way and a limited quantity of Google offices east of US-101. • The diverse small office and light industrial spaces in the Plan Area—especially near Commercial Street and Industrial Avenue—accommodate a wide variety of small businesses seeking flexible and relatively affordable space within Palo Alto. Tenant lease data indicates that at least two thirds of businesses in the Plan Area have 50 or fewer employees.
• Redevelopment of existing smaller light industrial and flex buildings in the Plan Area for housing and other uses creates a displacement risk for businesses in these spaces. Relocation within Palo Alto and even neighboring communities is challenging due to the limited and declining inventory of similar spaces due to their redevelopment for higher-intensity employment and housing uses. • The addition of housing in the Plan Area that is affordable to households with diverse income levels can help meet the needs of workers at jobs in Palo Alto and the Plan Area itself. Analysis of wages associated with the industry sector mix of jobs in Palo Alto found that 35 percent of worker households may qualify as low- or very low-income and likely require deed-restricted affordable housing to be able to live in Palo Alto. Within the Plan Area itself, U.S. Census data indicates that approximately 16 percent of “primary” jobs (i.e., the highest-paying job held by a worker) in 2022 paid less than $40,000 annually.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
46 Packet Pg. 159 of 541

36 5. HAZARDS, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND HISTORIC

RESOURCES
Note: Some of the topics discussed in this section (such as sea level rise) overlap with topics discussed in Sections 8 and 9. Since these topics are relevant for each of these subject areas, they have been included in each section.

Hazards
Environmental hazards studied as part of the
analysis to date include sea level rise and
wildfire. The study of seismic hazards and soil
and groundwater contamination is currently
in process, and additional content will be
provided when the studies are completed.

SEA LEVEL RISE
A portion of the Plan Area is located in the
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) Flood Zone AE, a Special Flood Hazard
Area (SFHA) designation with a one percent
(100-year flood) or greater annual chance of
flooding in any given year. Within the Plan
Area, the AE Zone covers a large area
generally from East Charleston Road to the
San Francisco Bay, shown in Figure 5.1. The
remainder of the Plan Area is located in SFHA
Zone X, with a 0.2% (500-year event) annual
chance of flood. The City of Palo Alto
completed a Sea Level Rise Vulnerability
Assessment in 2022 which documents
potential sea level rise (SLR) hazards to City
and community assets from increments
between 12 to 84 inches of SLR. Portions of
the Plan Area north and east of East
Charleston Road are predicted to be
inundated under a 36-inch SLR scenario
during an average tide. Areas north of the
Plan Area could experience overtopping by
Bay waters.

WILDFIRE
The Plan Area is not located in a Fire Hazard
Severity Zone (FHSZ) as defined by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE).

Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, David J Powers & Associates, 2025.

Figure 5.1. FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area in the Plan Area Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
47 Packet Pg. 160 of 541

37 SEISMIC HAZARDS
As detailed in the 2024 Santa Clara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan, the Bay Area is located in a geologically active area. The impact of an earthquake on buildings and infrastructure largely depends on ground shaking, the distance from the earthquake’s source, and the potential for liquefaction. Liquefaction generally occurs in soft, unconsolidated sedimentary soils with a shallow water table. The City of Palo Alto’s Safety Element identifies areas near the Bay and along creeks as having very high liquefaction susceptibility levels, and the entire Plan Area has at least a moderate liquefaction susceptibility level. Additional analysis of the seismic hazard within the Plan Area is underway.

SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
The portion of the Plan Area between East Charleston Road and US-101 has long been a light industrial and manufacturing area, which increases the possibility of soil and/or groundwater contamination. Sites with known or suspected contamination could require remediation prior to any new development. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has identified seven properties within the Plan Area with known or suspected contamination issues. The following addresses within the Plan Area are listed on the DTSC EnviroStor tool: 821 San Antonio Road, 844 East Charleston Road, 899 East Charleston Road, 3825 Fabian Way, 3839 Fabian Way, 890 Commercial Street, and 936 Industrial Avenue. 1275 North San Antonio Road (a City-owned parcel) is the site of the former Los Altos Treatment Plant, and required some remediation efforts prior to developing the HomeKey project. Additional analysis of these sites and the Plan Area is underway.

Public Safety
Police and fire services are essential components of a well-functioning and resilient community. Growth within the Plan Area may increase calls for service and place additional demands on personnel, equipment, and emergency access.

POLICE
Law enforcement protection services in Palo Alto are provided by the Palo Alto Police Department (PAPD) that employs a total of 141 positions (2025). The 2030 Comprehensive Plan EIR found that the existing police station is inadequate to accommodate growth under the General Plan. The PAPD is currently constructing a new Public Safety Building (PSB) at 250 Sherman Avenue which will serve as the new headquarters of the Police Department, 911 Emergency Dispatch Center, the Emergency Operations Center, the Office of Emergency Services, and the administration needs of the Fire Department. The new PSB building is scheduled to open in Fall 2025. With the new police station, police services are anticipated to be adequate to accommodate current and future needs of the City.

FIRE
The Palo Alto Fire Department’s (PAFD’s) service area covers the jurisdictional boundaries of Palo Alto in addition to some of the unincorporated land surrounding the City limit, much of which is occupied by Stanford University.

The PAFD staffs six full-time fire stations (Stations 1 through 6) and one seasonal fire station (Station 8), located strategically throughout the City. In addition to the PAFD’s primary service area, the City has entered into mutual aid and automatic aid agreements with the City of Mountain View, the City of Menlo Park, CAL FIRE, the Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD), and the Woodside Fire Protection District. The City has set a service goal at responding to all fire emergencies in 8 minutes or less 90% of the time. For medical emergencies, the goal is 8 Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
48 Packet Pg. 161 of 541

38 minutes or less 90% of the time and ambulance response, 12 minutes or less 90% of the time. Emergency medical services (EMS) in the PAFD service area are expected to increase incrementally with both the increase in population and the aging of the population. To meet increased demand, the PAFD is launching a new EMS ambulance program to enhance staffing and resource availability for the increase in EMS ambulance transports during peak hours. The City is also in the process of replacing Fire Station 4, the closest station to the Plan Area, which is estimated to be completed in 2027.

Historic Resources
The City’s Historic Preservation Program began in 1979, with subsequent Local Inventory updates in 2001 and 2023. Any individual or group may propose designating a historic structure, site, or district to the Inventory according to the procedure found in the Historic Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 16.49.040).

Properties nominated for designation are recommended by the Historic Resources Board and decided upon by the City Council. In addition to the City’s Historic Inventory, there are number of Palo Alto properties and four historic districts that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), including the Greenmeadow Historic District immediately adjacent to the Plan Area. The California Office of Historic Preservation recognizes the Greenmeadow Historic district, as well as Native American shell mounds in the vicinity and two sites in the Plan Area: 844 East Charleston Road as the site where Dr. Robert Noyce of Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation invented the first integrated circuit that could be produced commercially in 1959 and the Secundino Robles Adobe Site north-east of the San Antonio Road and Alma Street intersection. As of this report, there are no properties located within the Plan Area listed on the NRHP or on the Palo Alto Historic Inventory. Most existing structures within the Plan Area were constructed between approximately 1940 and 1980. Evaluation of the properties in the Plan Area for significant historical, archeological, and/or architectural value is in process.

Key Findings and Conclusions
The following environmental issues would need to be addressed as part of future development in the Plan Area.

Please note that some sections of this analysis are in progress as of the publication of this draft report, and analysis will continue as part of the Area Plan’s compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. • A large area within the Plan Area is designated as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). • Adapting to sea level rise would need to be addressed in the areas east of East Charleston Road. • Increased demand for EMS services may require increased EMS staffing and/or new apparatus and fire station improvements to support new development.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
49 Packet Pg. 162 of 541

39 6. PARKS, OPEN SPACE, AND PUBLIC

FACILITIES
Schools
The Plan Area is served by the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD), Mountain View-Whisman School District (MVWSD), and Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District, as shown in Figure 6.1. The PAUSD operates 13 elementary schools, three middle schools, and three high schools (including Middle College at Foothill College) within their service area. There is available capacity for more students at all PAUSD schools. Projections forecast a decline in enrollment district-wide across a 10-year period based upon historical enrollment trends and projected new development.

The MVWSD operates one
preschool, nine K-5 elementary
schools, and two 6-8 middle
schools. There is capacity for
additional enrollment in all the
MVWSD schools.

The Mountain View-Los Altos Union
High School District operates two
high schools within its boundaries.

The portions of the Plan Area
within the district’s boundaries are
served by Los Altos High School,
which is also currently enrolled at
below its capacity.

Figure 6.1. School Districts in the Plan Area
Source: City of Palo Alto GIS, David J Powers & Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
50 Packet Pg. 163 of 541

40 Parks and Recreational Facilities
The City of Palo Alto owns and operates 32 parks and four open space preserves. There are also a variety of other facilities in Palo Alto and the vicinity which are not City-owned and which serve some of the same demand for City-owned and operated facilities. These include PAUSD-owned land used for recreation, Stanford University open space and recreation lands, privately owned recreational facilities, land managed by conservation groups, and State and regional parks in the vicinity of Palo Alto. There are also open space preserves that serve larger service areas and contain a broad range of facilities, including picnic grounds, hiking and biking trails, wildlife watching and camping.

In addition, the City of Palo Alto Recreation Services Division offers youth and adult sports, teen and middle school activities, after-school programs, a variety of classes for all ages, and a wide range of special events.

Recreation facilities include the Cubberley, Lucie Stern, and Mitchell Park Community Centers; the Children’s Theater and Community Theater; Rinconada Pool; Junior Museum and Zoo; Baylands Golf Course; Art Center; Baylands Nature Interpretive Center; and the Skateboard Park at Greer Park.

The nearest parks and open spaces to the Plan Area include Henry W. Seale Park, Ramos Park, Mitchell Park, Monroe Park, Del Medio Park (Mountain View), Wyandotte Park (Mountain View), Thaddeus Park (Mountain View), Monta Loma School Field (Mountain View), Heritage Park (Mountain View), Baylands Nature Preserve, Shoreline at Mountain View Park (Mountain View). Under Comprehensive Plan Policy C-28, the City’s desired ratios are two acres of neighborhood parks plus two acres of district parks per 1,000 residents (four acres total) and a parkland dedication requirement of five acres of neighborhood park, district park, recreational facilities, and open space for every 1,000 residents.

The City of Palo Alto operates five community libraries, all of which were renovated between 2006 and 2015 and are considered to be in good condition. The Mitchell Park library is nearest to the Plan Area.

Key Findings and Conclusions
In terms of parks and public facilities, the Plan Area would need to consider the following as part of future development:
• Overall school enrollment is down across all three school districts that service the Plan Area (Palo Alto Unified School District, Mountain View-Whisman School District and Mountain View-Los Altos Union High School District).
• The City has a policy to reach two acres of neighborhood parks plus two acres of district parks per 1,000 residents (four acres total per 1,000 residents) and a parkland dedication requirement of five acres of neighborhood park, district park, recreational facilities, and open space for every 1,000 residents.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
51 Packet Pg. 164 of 541

41 7. NOISE AND AIR QUALITY
Noise and Vibration
The analysis for noise and vibration for the Plan Area includes a description of the fundamentals of environmental noise and ground-borne vibration, summarizes applicable regulatory criteria, and discusses the existing noise environment. It also identifies constraints for potential noise-sensitive uses and provides guidance to attain noise and land use compatibility. A noise measurement survey was completed to establish existing noise levels from substantial sources in the Plan Area, including both long- and short-term measurements at several locations.

SOURCES OF ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE
Primary sources of noise in the Plan Area include:
• Major ground transportation corridors such as US-101, Central Expressway/Alma Street, San Antonio Road, and Middlefield Road.
• Minor ground transportation corridors, such as small arterial roadways and collector streets, produce noise levels that contribute to ambient conditions on a localized basis. • The Union Pacific Railroad, located west of Central Expressway/Alma Street, provides a thoroughfare for freight and passenger (Caltrain) trains that produce noise and vibration during pass-by events. • Palo Alto Airport lies approximately 1.7 miles north-east of the Plan Area, and Moffett Federal Airfield lies approximately 2.2 miles south-east of the Plan Area, producing intermittent noise due to aircraft overflights. • Noise sources located on private property such as mechanical equipment, including fans, blowers, chillers, compressors, boilers, pumps, and air conditioning systems that may run continuously, and other intermittent sources of noise, including emergency generators, horns, and loading activities.

Sensitive land uses within and around the Plan Area include residences, hotels, religious institutions, schools, medical facilities, and libraries. Residential development is sensitive to community noise, both outdoors and indoors. Single-family residential development, schools, libraries, hospitals, convalescent homes, and places of worship are considered the most noise-sensitive land uses. High-density/mixed-use residential, commercial, and industrial development is considered less noise-sensitive because uses are primarily indoors and can be mitigated with building design and construction.

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
• Locate sensitive land uses in noise and vibration environments that are compatible with the proposed uses.

The possibility of sensitive development encroaching on existing noise sources could result in some land use conflicts, requiring careful consideration during the planning process. • Ensure that new noise-generating land uses do not substantially increase ambient noise levels at adjacent sensitive land uses.
• Ensure that increase in traffic does not substantially increase ambient noise levels at sensitive land uses. • Mitigate construction noise and construction vibration to the extent possible to not adversely affect adjacent sensitive land uses.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
52 Packet Pg. 165 of 541

42 Air Quality
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air District) publishes California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Air Quality Guidelines and provides tools and recommendations to develop plans that are consistent with Clean Air Plan goals. Air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis for the Plan Area found the following issues:
• Meeting Ambient Air Quality Standards. The region is considered to be in non-attainment for the criteria air pollutants ozone (O3) and particulate matter (respirable particulate matter [PM10] and fine particulate matter [PM2.5]). Criteria air pollutant levels have generally decreased over the last 25 years, as regional emissions of pollutants and precursor pollutants have decreased. An increase in episodes of wildfire smoke in recent years, however, has caused spikes in the number of days that air quality standards have been exceeded. While overall trends for air pollutants remain downward over the last 25 years, the trend in annual PM2.5 concentrations has only slightly decreased; however, the levels are at or below standards. A large number of exceedances occurred in the years 2017 through 2020 due to episodes of wildfire smoke. • Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). The Plan Area is less burdened with TACs than 50 percent of the State (a CalEnviroScreen range of 5 to 50 percentile). The Air District considers 70 percentile or higher as overburdened. While efforts to control TAC emissions have been quite effective, some areas are still exposed to levels that exceed the Air District’s recommended thresholds. Common sources of TAC exposure include large volumes of truck traffic, construction activity, diesel generators, and gasoline stations. Air monitoring data published by the Air District for benzene shows dramatic decreases in ambient concentrations at all Bay Area stations.

Conclusions
For the Plan Area to grow while maintaining air quality, the following challenges will need to be resolved:
• Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The Air District’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines recommend that land use plans demonstrate the growth in vehicle travel (measured as trips or VMT) at a lower rate than the population growth rate. This could be accomplished through land uses and policies that encourage non- motorized travel and shorter commute distances.
• Compliance with Clean Air Plan Measures and Air District Recommendations. Planned land uses will need to be in conformity with Clean Air Plan measures, including periodic updates by the Air District to ensure progress in attaining and maintaining ambient air quality standards. • Reducing Unhealthy Exposure to TAC and Air Pollutants. The effects of TACs on the public is typically evaluated through health risk assessments (HRAs) that predict excess cancer risk, non-cancer health hazards, and exposure to PM2.5. The Plan Area is affected by a large number of TAC sources. The primary sources that drive overall exposures are busy roadways, diesel locomotives using Caltrain, and stationary sources permitted by the Air District. The Air District provides screening tools to assess the risks that these sources pose to the Area. Refined modeling can be conducted at a project level to further assess these impacts and predict future exposures as controls to reduce TACs become more effective.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
53 Packet Pg. 166 of 541

43 8. INFRASTRUCTURE
Note: Some of the topics discussed in this section (such as sea level rise) overlap with topics discussed in Sections 5 and 9. Since these topics are relevant for each of these subject areas, they have been included in each section.

Storm Drain Infrastructure
Storm drainage facilities in and around the Plan Area are owned and maintained by the City of Palo Alto. Per the 2015 City of Palo Alto Storm Drain Master Plan, the Plan Area is located within the Adobe Creek Watershed and surface water drains north towards Adobe Creek and towards the San Francisco Bay. Local stormwater infrastructure is located in the rights-of-way of San Antonio Road, East Charleston Road, Fabian Way, and along Adobe Creek, which runs on the north side of the Plan Area. The Master Plan found that portions of the storm drain system are currently under
capacity, and identified high priority
system upgrades for East and West
Bayshore Road, East Meadow Drive,
East Meadow Circle, East Charleston
Road and Adobe Creek, and Fabian
Way, as shown in Figure 8.1.

FLOODING
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM) indicate a range of flood hazard
risk levels for parcels within the Plan
Area. As discussed in Section 5, the
Plan Area between East Charleston
Road and the San Francisco Bay falls
within Zone AE, a Special Flood Hazard
Area (SFHA) subject to inundation by a
one percent annual chance flood,
known as the base flood with an
elevation of 10.5. The rest of the Plan
Area falls within Flood Zone X with a
lower probability of flooding. The Plan
Area periodically experiences flooding
during large storm events at the area
bound by East Bayshore Road and
Adobe Creek, West Bayshore Road
and Adobe Creek, East Meadow Circle
and Fabian Drive upstream of the
Adobe Pump Station. The flooding
experienced is generally due to flap
gates unable to open when the water
level in the creek exceeds the height
of the gate at the outfall. In 2024
Public Works Engineering completed
Source: City of Palo Alto’s 2015 Storm Drain Master Plan, Schaaf & Wheeler, 2015.

Figure 8.1. 2015 Storm Drain Master Plan Priority Projects Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
54 Packet Pg. 167 of 541

44 the necessary improvements along East Meadow Circle and East Meadow Drive and eliminated the flooding potential that would otherwise occur when the gravity fed line was unable to discharge into the creek. Public Works Engineering is working on a separate construction contract to install two small pump stations and storm drainpipe upgrades on both East and West Bayshore Road to eliminate the street flooding that occurs near Adobe Creek. These projects will be completed by December 2026.

Future development projects should anticipate implementation measures to protect from flooding and sea level rise, and to reduce impact on existing drainage infrastructure.

Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure
The City of Palo Alto owns and maintains the wastewater system. Local wastewater is collected and conveyed to sewer mains on all public roads and public utility easements on private property, with the trunk main located at the north-east side of the Plan Area. All wastewater is then conveyed to the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant for treatment and discharge or reuse as recycled water. The 2004 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan – Capacity Assessment by MWH Americas evaluated the capacity of the existing wastewater system and identified areas with limited capacities and need for system improvements and rehabilitation. According to the 2023 Sanitary Sewer Management Plan, all the identified projects have been completed. The City is planning to complete a new Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Study which will include an updated capacity assessment and recommendations for Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Future development projects should anticipate implementing system upgrades that align with identified deficiencies in the future Master Plan Study.

Additionally, there are several sewer mains within the Plan Area smaller than eight inches that should be replaced with larger pipe sizes as part of future development.

Domestic and Recycled Water Infrastructure
The City of Palo Alto owns and maintains the water distribution system. The Plan Area is adequately served, with water mains in the rights-of-way of Fabian Drive, San Antonio Road, East Charleston Road, Middlefield Road, Alma Street, and East and West Bayshore Road. Future development with a change in land use should anticipate implementing system upgrades, with review on a project-by-project basis. Some of the smaller existing water mains may need to be upsized to meet localized fire flow requirements, depending on actual building heights, locations, densities, and construction types.

Currently, only the areas east of US-101 and Greer Park are serviced with recycled water. The City has also identified future expansions of the recycled water distribution system within City extents but outside of the Plan Area. Given the proximity of the Plan Area to the existing recycled water system, the City may consider expanding the recycled water distribution system within the Plan Area to offset future water demand and usage. New recycled water pipelines would need to be extended across US-101 to serve the majority of the Plan Area.

Distribution pipelines would also need to be built within the street rights-of-way to serve individual properties, and new buildings in the Plan Area would need to be dual plumbed for both domestic and recycled water use.

Further study is required to evaluate the feasibility of expanding the existing recycled water distribution system into the Plan Area.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
55 Packet Pg. 168 of 541

45 Natural Gas and Electricity Infrastructure
The City of Palo Alto provides natural gas and electricity. Multiple gas mains serve the Plan Area that are located within the rights-of-way of every public street as well as on several private roads and properties. With current policies encouraging new development to be designed as “all electric,” the demand for natural gas is expected to decrease. Existing electrical and fiber optic lines adequately serve the Plan Area. Existing electrical utilities consist of both underground and overhead lines. It should be anticipated that existing overhead electrical lines will be converted to underground lines in conjunction with future development. It should also be anticipated that future development will increase electrical demand. Undergrounding existing overhead electrical lines could represent an opportunity to upgrade the network in anticipation of potential increases in electrical demand.

Key Findings and Conclusions
• The City of Palo Alto owns and provides stormwater, wastewater, domestic water, recycled water, natural gas, and electrical utilities.
• Stormwater. Stormwater drains north towards Adobe Creek and the San Francisco Bay via catch basins and pipes in public rights-of-way. The Adobe Pump Station is located within the Plan Area, and outfalls into Adobe Creek. The 2015 Storm Drain Master Plan identified seven high priority improvement projects in the vicinity of the Plan Area to alleviate flooding caused by large storm events. Two of these projects are complete, three are under construction and two others will be completed by 2032. • Flooding. The portion of Plan Area that falls within FEMA Flood Zone AE is subject to inundation by a one percent annual chance flood, also known as the base flood with an elevation of 10.5. The remaining portion of the Plan Area that falls within FEMA Flood Zone X, has a 0.2 percent annual chance of flooding. Future developments in the Plan Area will have to account for the base flood elevation and implement measures to protect new buildings from flooding and sea level rise in accordance with Building Codes. For example, under FEMA regulations, basement levels are not permitted beneath residential buildings within FEMA Flood Zones.
• Wastewater. Local wastewater is collected and conveyed via sewer mains in public rights-of-way and public utility easements on private property, then conveyed to the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant for treatment and discharged into the San Francisco Bay, or reused as reclaimed water. According to the 2023 Sanitary Sewer Management Plan, all improvement projects identified in the 2004 Wastewater Master Plan have been completed. Future development projects should anticipate implementing system upgrades that align with identified deficiencies in any future Master Plan studies. • Domestic Water. The area is served by water mains in all public rights-of-way and public utility easements on private property. Some smaller water mains may need to be upsized with future development in order to meet localized fire flow requirements.
• Recycled Water. The only recycled water line in the vicinity of the Plan Area runs along East Bayshore Road.

Given its proximity to existing lines, the City may consider expanding the recycled water distribution system within the Plan Area to offset future water demand and usage. • Natural Gas. With current policies encouraging the transition of new developments to be designed as “all electric,” a decrease in demand for natural gas is expected. • Electricity. Existing electrical utilities consist of both underground and overhead lines. In conjunction with future development and anticipated increase in demand for electricity, there can be opportunities to underground existing overhead electrical lines when upgrading the electrical network.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
56 Packet Pg. 169 of 541

46 Source: Cal-Adapt, Raimi + Associates

9. CLIMATE AND RESILIENCE
Note: Some of the topics discussed in this section (such as sea level rise) overlap with topics discussed in Sections 5 and 8. Since these topics relevant for each of these subject areas, they have been included in each section.

Policies Regarding Climate Hazard Planning
Hazards related to climate change studied for the Plan Area include sea level rise (SLR), shallow groundwater rise, flooding, changes to precipitation and drought, extreme heat, and wildfire. Plan Area-specific information regarding impacts from climate change is referenced from the Santa Clara County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan and Palo Alto Annex (2024), the Palo Alto Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment, and data from Cal-Adapt.

The Safety Element of the City of Palo Alto’s Comprehensive Plan addresses natural and human-caused hazards. It contains a Natural Hazards policy framework that includes general safety measures and measures to address flood and fire risk. In 2023-24, Santa Clara County led the update of the Santa Clara County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (SCC MJHMP) with 15 participating jurisdictions and three special districts. As a participating jurisdiction, Palo Alto adopted its own Annex to the SCC MJHMP with more City-specific information.

The ratings in the Annex are from an emergency management lens so they do not consider how climate change will increase the probability and impacts of each hazard in the future. Rather, it considers climate change as a hazard on its own. The City of Palo Alto’s 2022 Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) aims to reduce carbon emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2030. Though the S/CAP’s main purpose is climate action (greenhouse gas mitigation) one of its “Key Issues” is “Climate Adaptation and Sea Level Rise”. The S/CAP has two goals and eight actions related to climate adaptation, and also has goals and associated actions to “minimize the impacts of wildland fire hazards,” but they are not as directly relevant to the Plan Area because it is not located in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

Future development in the Plan Area will also be affected by new SLR planning processes. SB 272 (2023) requires that all local governments in the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) adopt a subregional Shoreline Adaptation Plan that complies with the requirements of the BCDC Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan (RSAP) by January 2034. Palo Alto is in BCDC’s jurisdiction and can adopt a plan on its own or be part of a plan with other entities.

Baseline Conditions and Projections
Climate projections from the Cal-Adapt database and other reports completed by the City are summarized in Table 9.1.

Table 9.1. Summary of Hazard Projections
Climate Hazard Trend
Sea level rise More areas potentially exposed to inundation and flooding Shallow groundwater rise Higher groundwater levels and more areas where groundwater comes above the surface of the ground (emergent groundwater)
Flooding Flooding may exceed mapped FEMA floodplains
Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
57 Packet Pg. 170 of 541

47 SEA LEVEL RISE
The Bayward portion of the Plan Area up to East
Charleston Road may only experience temporary
flooding during a 100-year storm tide under
current conditions and for up to 24 inches of SLR.

However, the SLR Vulnerability Assessment found
that the average high tide with 36 inches of SLR is
a tipping point when many areas of the City
become vulnerable to permanent inundation
(Figure 9.1). With SLR at 36 inches and above, and
without further shoreline protections, the
Bayward portion of the Plan Area up to East
Charleston Road may experience permanent
inundation with the average high tide, and the
extent of temporary flooding will extend further
inland.

SHALLOW GROUNDWATER RISE
Currently, the existing depth of groundwater
surface within the Plan Area ranges from more
than 10 feet farthest away from the Bay (inland
from Mackay Drive), to less than zero feet in the
area that is part of the Baylands Nature Preserve
(Figure 9.2). However, groundwater within the
Plan Area is projected to rise as SLR occurs. In
general, areas close to the Bay shoreline (and
former wetland areas) are more likely to
experience emergent groundwater flooding. The
area of emergent groundwater expands inland
with higher SLR scenarios.

LIQUEFACTION
Elevation of the groundwater table can affect
liquefaction hazards during large earthquakes.

Nearly all the Plan Area has only “Moderate”
liquefaction susceptibility. However, a portion of
the Plan Area across US-101 close to tidal marshes
has “Very High” susceptibility.

Precipitation and drought Longer dry spells and more extreme storms Extreme heat Higher average and maximum temperatures, more heatwaves with longer duration, more warm nights
Wildfire More wildfire smoke
Figure 9.1. SLR Exposure Projections

Source: City of Palo Alto SLR Vulnerability Assessment, 2024; Raimi + Associates, 2025.

Figure 9.2. Existing and Projected Groundwater Depth

Source: City of Palo Alto SLR Vulnerability Assessment, 2024; Raimi + Associates, 2025.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
58 Packet Pg. 171 of 541

48 FLOODING
As mentioned previously in Sections 5 and 8 of this report, portions of the Plan Area are in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Zone AE, which designates a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) with a one percent or greater annual chance of flooding. Within the Plan Area, the AE Flood Zone covers a large area generally from Middlefield Road to the Bay. The remainder of the Plan Area is designated as Flood Zone X, which falls inside the 500-year flood zone.

Key Findings and Conclusions
• The Plan Area is projected to experience varying degrees of flooding from Sea Level Rise (SLR). Temporary flooding may occur under existing conditions and up to 24 inches of SLR. However, 36 inches of SLR is a tipping point at which permanent flooding could occur in the Bayward portion of the Plan Area up to East Charleston Road.
• The Bayward portion of the Plan Area up to East Charleston Road is within FEMA Flood Zone AE, which means it could be flooded by a one percent chance annual flood event. The rest of the Plan Area is within FEMA Flood Zone X, which means it is at moderate-to-low flood risk. • Groundwater is projected to rise as sea levels rise. An increase of 36 inches of SLR is the point at which groundwater may begin emerging above the ground surface in the Plan Area. • All available indicators of extreme heat (e.g., average daily temperatures, duration of heat waves) are projected to increase in the Plan Area.
• The Plan Area is not directly in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone, but it may experience more wildfire smoke in the future, due to an increased likelihood and severity of wildfires in other parts of the City and region.

Item 3
Attachment A - San Antonio
Road Area Plan - Existing
Conditions Analysis
Summary Report,
September 4, 2025 Draft

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
59 Packet Pg. 172 of 541

Item 3
Attachment B - San Antonio Road
Area Plan Map

Item 3: Staff Report
Pg.
60 Packet Pg. 173 of 541

City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR
Lead Department: Administrative Services
Meeting Date: October 6, 2025
Report #:2506-4900
TITLE
Approval of FY 2025 Reappropriation Requests to FY 2026 Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets and Additional Technical Clean-Up Actions and Corresponding Amendments to the FY 2026 Budget Appropriation for Various Funds. CEQA Status: Not a Project

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council amend the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation for various funds as identified in Attachment A, and various capital projects as identified in Attachment B and Attachment C (requires 2/3 approval).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As a part of the fiscal year-end process, staff reviews the City’s unencumbered and unspent appropriations of the fiscal year just ended (FY 2025), along with the City’s spending plans.

Encumbered amounts are contractual obligations (for example, commitments made through purchase orders), which are carried forward from one fiscal year to the next without the need for Council approval. Each year there are important projects that were unable to encumber funds in the year that just ended. The reappropriation process allows staff to bring forward funding recommendations to City Council to continue these projects into the next fiscal year (FY 2026) without impacting funding programmed for services in FY 2026.

In limited instances, staff also recommends appropriation actions unrelated to the reappropriation process. Most of the time, these are technical clean-up actions for capital projects. In FY 2026, staff recommends appropriating additional funding for the Roth Building Rehabilitation Phase I project (PF-23001) to adjust for centrally allocated salary and benefit costs in order to complete the final $500,000 Council directed payment for the project.

Additionally, there is a recommendation to add a new project in the Capital Improvement Fund to respond to resident concerns about emergency evacuations expressed during a recent Neighborhood Town Hall meeting.

Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
1 Packet Pg. 174 of 541

BACKGROUND
Chapter 2.28, Section 2.28.090 of the Municipal Code allows for reappropriation of funding from the previous fiscal year to the current fiscal year if the Administrative Services Department (ASD) Director/Chief Financial Officer (CFO) certifies that sufficient unencumbered and unexpended funds are available in the Fiscal Year that just ended (FY 2025) to be carried forward to the subsequent Fiscal Year (FY 2026).

Additionally, since capital projects may be delayed or deferred for various reasons, there remains a need to reappropriate funds for capital projects in some instances. This reappropriation is completed through a review of the status of projects as part of the annual budget process and is built into the annual adopted budget. As FY 2025 has closed and staff has processed necessary accounting transactions, unexpended and unencumbered funds for each capital project have been reviewed for a final time. Based on this review, staff recommends capital dollars remaining for some projects in FY 2025 be reappropriated to FY 2026. Also, as part of this review, staff found that some reappropriations earlier in the year resulted in excessive funding for certain projects in FY 2026. Therefore, this staff report recommends reversing a portion of those previously authorized reappropriations to address these situations.

ANALYSIS
Attachment A identifies those operating budget requests that staff recommends for approval, while Attachment B lists recommended capital project requests. Attachment C includes technical clean-up actions to align project budgets with intended funding levels as well as recommending a new capital project, Emergency Gate at Foothill and Miranda (PE-26003), in the Capital Improvement Fund. With the submission of this report for City Council consideration, the ASD Director/CFO certifies sufficient unencumbered and unexpended funds are available from FY 2025 to be reappropriated to FY 2026. To support the continuity of business for these ongoing projects and initiatives, this report is being brought forward prior to the FY 2025 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), scheduled to be considered by the Finance Committee in December.

Operating Budget Reappropriations
The projects recommended for budget reappropriations are outlined in more detail in Attachment A and can generally be grouped into the following categories:
Funding for Citywide Council Priorities: Items in this category are related to citywide priority needs previously identified by the Council, as part of the FY 2025 priority setting in January 2025, that could not be completed in FY 2025 and funding is recommended to be reappropriated to FY 2026 to complete the work. Examples of projects in this category include: Gas Cap and Trade Support for Electrification Pilot Programs ($1.4 million), Advancing Racial Equity ($0.2 million), Labor Negotiations ($0.1 million), Sustainability and Climate Action Plan (S/CAP) Studies ($55,000), and Child Care Services Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
2 Packet Pg. 175 of 541

($20,000).
Timing and Workload Delays: Projects in this category were delayed due to competing workload demands, appropriation of funds late in the fiscal year, or other unanticipated delays. Examples of projects in this category include: Development Impact and In-Lieu Fee Study ($0.3 million), Economic and Market Feasibility Study ($0.2 million), Information Technology Infrastructure Maintenance ($0.2 million), Biosolids Screw Conveyors Repair ($0.1 million), Foothill Fire Management Funds ($0.1 million), and Airplane Noise Reduction Study ($75,000).
Multi-year Funding Agreements: Projects in this category include approved donations, grants, loans, and other funding agreements that are anticipated to continue in the coming year. Examples in this category include: Information Technology Fees for Planning and Development Services Technology Replacement ($0.3 million), National Opioid Settlement ($0.3 million), Police Officer Wellness Grant ($46,500), and Direct Cost Recovery Projects in the Planning and Development Services Department ($33,400).
Teen Services Programs (formerly Bryant Street Garage Teen Program): In 2001, the City Council voted to lease commercial space at the Bryant Street garage located at 455 Bryant Street. Since this site was formerly the location of the Bryant Street Teen Center, a stipulation in the lease required that 75% of the rental revenues would be used to fund programs specifically for Palo Alto youth and teens. The unspent balance of $0.2 million is recommended to be reappropriated to ensure resources are available to continue providing quality teen services to the community and develop a long-term approach to maintain delivery of these services. As such, a portion of the reappropriated funds in FY 2026 will be used to furnish and create a dedicated teen space at the 445 Bryant Street space, further enhancing opportunities for youth engagement and connection.
Management Training Program: The Management Training Program provides $1,000 per eligible employee under the terms outlined in the MGMT and PAPMA labor agreements. The purpose of this program is to provide employees with resources to improve and supplement their job and professional skills. In total, $0.3 million in unused funding is requested to be reappropriated for various training programs, including:
ethics, civics and citizen engagement, leadership and management, budget, finance, procurement, interpersonal communication, presentation skills, business writing, time management, project management, change management, online-based education, and safety and security.

Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
3 Packet Pg. 176 of 541

Operating Reappropriations Previously Approved in the FY 2026 Adopted Operating Budget As part of the FY 2026 Budget review process, early reappropriation of anticipated savings in the General Fund and in the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund in FY 2025 was recommended and approved by the Council to fund actions in FY 2026. The total approved amount of $15.9 million already reappropriated to FY 2026 consisted of the $12.0 million Uncertainty Reserve, $3.7 million Police Organized Retail Theft (ORT) Grant, $82,400 for the Nonprofit Workplan, $80,000 for the City Employee Childcare program, and $40,000 for the Human Services Resource Allocation Process (HSRAP) Reserve.

The Uncertainty Reserve was established as part of the FY 2023 Mid-Year Review to proactively set aside funding for anticipated future deficits. The funding remaining in the Uncertainty Reserve in FY 2025 ($12.0 million) was reappropriated to FY 2026 as part of the budget process and $6.1 million was used to balance FY 2026. This leaves $6.1 million in the reserve for future budget planning needs.

In December 2023, the City received $5.2 million from the State of California Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) for the Organized Retail Theft (ORT) Grant Program. This grant provides funding to combat ORT and to increase the recovery of stolen vehicles. Through this grant, the Police Department utilizes overtime to patrol and investigate ORT crimes in shopping districts. The Department also equips patrol vehicles with technology to aid in the apprehension of stolen vehicles. This action reappropriates the remaining funds ($3.7 million) as well as the revenue reimbursement to FY 2026 to continue the program through the end of the three-year grant period in December 2026.

As part of the Council deliberation in June 2025 to adopt the FY 2026 budget (Staff Report 2503-42501), an action was taken to increase funding for the Nonprofit Workplan Phase I awards by $82,400. The increase was funded by an early reappropriation of the Council Contingency Account balance from FY 2025.

The City Employee Childcare Program provides funding for a childcare subsidy program for qualified City of Palo Alto employees. Services provided in this program include, but are not limited to childcare or after school care using a Palo Alto childcare provider. This action reappropriates the remaining balance of $80,000 from the second year of this pilot program to continue for a third year to maintain employee engagement, long-term retention, and reduce turnover.
1 City Council, June 16, 2026; Agenda Item # 23, Staff Report # 2503-4250:
https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=188956&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=14fd96b7-f3d3-4236- a53b-f01e67a648d6
Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
4 Packet Pg. 177 of 541

As part of the FY 2015 Adopted Budget, the City Council established a one-time reserve of $50,000 for HSRAP funding requests. In FY 2019, $10,000 was allocated to Heart and Home Collaborative, a non-profit organization that provides shelter and services to unhoused women in Palo Alto. No additional funds were allocated from this reserve in FY 2025, so the remaining balance of $40,000 was reappropriated to FY 2026.

Capital Budget Reappropriations
The FY 2026 Adopted Budget included $140.9 million in reappropriated expenditure funds, partially offset by $16.9 million in reappropriated revenue, across all City funds based on estimates of anticipated spending and revenue collections in FY 2025. Since the adoption of the capital budget, some adjustments and refinements to project reappropriations are required since FY 2025 year-end actuals and projects costs have been updated to reflect actual experience. These primarily reflect either increases or decreases to assumed reappropriations in the FY 2026 Adopted Budget:
Additional reappropriations are recommended when project expenditures originally anticipated to occur before the end of FY 2025 will now instead occur in FY 2026.

Similarly, revenue previously anticipated to be collected in FY 2025 will be reappropriated to FY 2026 to align with actual collections. Downward adjustments to reappropriations are recommended when expenses are no longer anticipated to occur in FY 2026 and funding was previously reappropriated in the budget document to FY 2026. If expenses were realized in FY 2025, an adjustment to reduce the budgeted reappropriation is needed as the activity no longer needs funding in FY 2026. The downward reappropriation of revenue is treated similarly; an adjustment to reduce the reappropriated revenue is needed to align collections in the appropriate fiscal year.

Table 1 summarizes the recommended capital project adjustments by fund as detailed in Attachment B. These Fiscal Year 2026 adjustment amounts represent the final step in the City Council-approved change to the reappropriation process. There are sufficient expenditure savings in Fiscal Year 2025 to support all recommended adjustments.

Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
5 Packet Pg. 178 of 541

Table 1: Year-End Capital Project Reappropriation Summary – By Fund Fund
Number
of
Projects
Recommended
Expense
Reappropriation
Adjustment
Recommended
Revenue
Reappropriation
Adjustment
Capital Improvement Fund 66 $31,795,675 $20,159,217
Cubberley Infrastructure Fund 3 $101,175 -
Airport Fund 1 - $58,393
Electric Fund 10 ($825,326) $50,000,000
Fiber Optics Fund 1 ($23,690) -
Gas Fund 4 ($86,342) -
Stormwater Management
Fund 5 $910,016 $4,321
Wastewater Collection Fund 3 $804,402 -
Wastewater Treatment Fund 8 $12,469,107 $182,506,873
Water Fund 5 $2,519,270 -
Technology Fund 5 $668,739 -
Vehicle Replacement and
Maintenance Fund 3 ($744,182) -
Total All Funds 114 $47,588,845 $252,728,804
The active review of all project reappropriations results in a reduced level of reappropriated funding from one year to the next, compared to the process of automatically reappropriating unspent capital funding, and better reflects the needs of the various capital projects and of the overall program. In total, $188.5 million will be reappropriated for capital projects, offset by $269.6 million in revenue for the projects. It should be noted 72.2% of the total recommended revenue reappropriation adjustment amount of $252.7 million comes from the Wastewater Treatment Fund because there is substantial lag time in reimbursement of funds from the State Revolving Fund (SRF) loans that support Wastewater Treatment projects.

The recommended expenditure reappropriation adjustment amount of $47,577 for the Golf Reconfiguration & Baylands Athletic Center Improvements project (PG-13003) detailed in Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
6 Packet Pg. 179 of 541

Attachment B includes $16,497 and $23,503 reappropriated from FY 2025 savings in the Baylands Nature Preserve Entrance Gate (OS-24000) and Park and Open Space Emergency Repairs (PG-09002) projects, respectively. These amounts are needed to fund the Wetland Remedial Plan for PG-13003 that was approved by the City Council on September 8, 2025 (Staff Report #2507-50133).

Technical Clean-up Actions
As detailed in Attachment C, in FY 2026, staff recommends appropriating additional funding for the Roth Building Rehabilitation Phase I project (PF-23001) to adjust for centrally allocated salary and benefit costs in order to complete the final $500,000 Council directed payment for the project. This action will increase appropriation by $0.1 million in FY 2026 to restore the full amount of funding required to maintain the overall project scope.

Staff also recommends the addition of a new capital project in the Capital Improvement Fund, Emergency Gate at Foothill and Miranda (PE-26003), with initial funding of $50,000 to evaluate, in coordination with Santa Clara County permitting staff, the feasibility of installing an emergency gate near the end of Miranda Avenue to Foothill Expressway. Factors to be evaluated include property ownership, right-of-way issues, utility and tree conflicts, and access restrictions. This project is recommended in response to concerns about emergency evacuations expressed by residents during the June 11, 2025 Neighborhood Town Hall meeting.

FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
Most projects, programs, and corresponding funding contained within this report were previously approved by the City Council for FY 2025. This report primarily realigns funding between fiscal years to align with the status of projects and programs. The ASD Director/CFO certified that sufficient funds exist in FY 2025 for the recommended Fiscal Year 2026 Operating Budget adjustments (Attachment A), and Capital Budget adjustments (Attachments B and C).

For Operating reappropriations, staff recommends expense reappropriations of $1.5 million in the General Fund, $1.5 million in Enterprise Funds, $0.5 million in Internal Service Funds, and $0.3 million in Special Revenue Funds. Staff also recommends revenue reappropriations of $33,400 in the General Fund.

Capital project reappropriations and technical adjustments were summarized in the Analysis section. The only item in this report that was not previously approved by City Council, and which does not represent a realignment between fiscal years, is the recommendation to respond to resident concerns by creating the Emergency Gate at Foothill and Miranda capital 3 City Council, September 8, 2025, Agenda Item #11, Staff Report # 2507-5013:
https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=221250&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=05f606b6-2691-47c3- a249-2fa79c6cd975
Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
7 Packet Pg. 180 of 541

project (PE-26003) which would result in a drawdown of $50,000 from Infrastructure Reserve in the Capital Improvement Fund in FY 2026.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Review and reconciliation of the funding available for both the Operating reappropriations and the reappropriations for individual Capital projects were coordinated between ASD divisions of the Office of Management and Budget and Accounting, as well as with the departments requesting the reappropriated funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council action on this item is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as defined in CEQA Guidelines, section 15378, because budget reappropriations are a government funding mechanism or fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: FY 2025 to FY 2026 Operating Reappropriation Requests Attachment B: FY 2025 to FY 2026 Capital Reappropriation Requests Attachment C: Capital Improvement Plan FY 2026 Technical Clean-up Actions APPROVED BY:

Lauren Lai, Administrative Services Director
Item 4
Item 4 Staff Report

Item 4: Staff Report
Pg.
8 Packet Pg. 181 of 541

FY 2024 TO FY 2025 OPERATING BUDGET REAPPROPRIATIONS ATTACHMENT A Fund
Number Fund Name Department Title Description
Recommended
Revenue
Appropriation
Recommended
Expense
Appropriation
102 General Fund Community Services Child Care Services This action reappropriates funding from the Child Care Trust Fund to support the Child Care Mini Grant Program and Professional Development opportunities for local child care providers. The Mini Grant Program received fewer applications than anticipated in FY 2025, and planned Professional Development courses were delayed. This reappropriation allows the Community Services Department to continue delivering these programs without the need for additional funding requests from the Trust Fund.
$ 20,000
102 General Fund Community Services Bryant Street Revenue - Teen Services Program
This action reappropriates funds for teen services from revenue generated by the rental of the Bryant Street Garage. In 2001, the City Council voted to lease out a garage property located at 455 Bryant Street. Since this site was formerly the location of the Bryant Street Teen Center, a stipulation in the lease required that 75 percent of the rental revenues would be used to fund programs specifically for Palo Alto youth and teens. Over the years, staff has returned to the Policy and Services Committee and City Council for direction on community engagement and potential uses of these funds.

The unspent balance of $0.2 million is recommended to be reappropriated to ensure resources are available to continue providing quality teen services to the community and develop a long-term approach to maintain delivery of these services. As such, a portion of the reappropriated funds in FY 2026 will be used to furnish and create a dedicated teen space at the 445 Bryant Street space, further enhancing opportunities for youth engagement and connection.
$ 216,000
102 General Fund Human Resources Labor Negotiations
Reappropriation
This action reappropriates labor negotiations funding as a strategic measure to proactively address upcoming expenditures and other labor related projects and programs. This proactive financial adjustment will ensure the availability of resources to cover anticipated and unplanned legal expenses associated with the continuing counsel required for the enforcement of the negotiated contracts.
$ 100,000
102 General Fund Non-Departmental Management Development Funds This action reappropriates funding for management training and professional development. The Management Training Program provides $1,000 per eligible employee under the terms outlined in the labor agreements and compensation plans with the Management and Professional group and the Palo Alto Police Management Association. In alignment with the City's Positive Workplace initiative and to address the City's overall need for training and development the Human Resources' Career Advancement/Training Division established contracts to deliver Organizational Development, Leadership Training, and Coaching services across all city departments. This strategic partnership with the selected vendors will entail continued close collaboration with City leadership and the various departments.
$ 250,000

Page 1 of 5 ends

Palo Alto City CouncilOctober 6, 2025

Palo Alto City Council
October 6, 2025