Cities Index.
Item 11 Staff Report

Palo Alto City Council
December 1, 2025

Document
Item 11 Staff Report
Meeting
December 1, 2025
Body
Palo Alto City Council
Original file
1.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofpaloalto.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

City Council
Staff Report
From: City Manager
Report Type: CONSENT CALENDAR
Lead Department: Public Works
Meeting Date: December 1, 2025
Report #:2511-5409
TITLE
Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract C09124501A with GreenWaste of Palo Alto to Extend the Term for an Additional Four Years Through June 30, 2030, for an Estimated Average Annual Compensation of $24,840,211, including an Estimated $1,400,589 in Additional Expenses; Approval of Replacement of Aging Collection Vehicles for an Estimated $5,900,000 in Additional Expenses; Approval of a Budget Amendment in the Refuse Fund; and Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Revocable Non-Exclusive License For Use of a Portion of the Former Los Altos Treatment Plant Located at 1237 San Antonio Road by GreenWaste of Palo Alto Through June 30, 2030; CEQA Status - Not a Project

RECOMMENDATION
The Finance Committee and staff recommend that City Council:

1. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C09124501A with GreenWaste of Palo Alto to extend the term for an additional four years to end June 30, 2030, for an estimated average annual compensation of $24,840,211, including an estimated additional cost of $1,400,589 for additional expenses in vehicle repairs and maintenance, and container replacements;

2. Approve and authorize the replacement of aging collection vehicles for an estimated total of $5,900,000;

3. Amend the Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Appropriation for the Refuse Fund (requires a 2/3 majority vote) by:
a. Decreasing the Refuse Fund balance by $2,610,000; and b. Increasing the Collection, Hauling, Disposal appropriation for Refuse Collection by $2,610,000; and

4. Approve Amendment No. 1 to the revocable non-exclusive license for GreenWaste of Palo Alto to continue using a portion of the Former Los Altos Treatment Plant, located at 1237 San Antonio Road, for an additional four years to end June 30, 2030.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the contract with GreenWaste of Palo Alto be amended to extend its term by an additional four years through June 2030. In addition, staff requests that the Finance Committee review and consider the GWPA requests for 1) replacing aging collection vehicles and 2) providing additional compensation for vehicle repairs and incrementally increasing maintenance on the remaining fleet vehicles, and container replacements during the extended term. Extending the contract will ensure continuity of essential waste collection services for the community and enable a long-term strategy to consolidate the currently separate collection and processing contracts. This alignment will also position the City to explore its post-2030 zero waste goals and implement further sustainability enhancements aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

On November 4, 2025, the Finance Committee reviewed and unanimously recommended that Council adopt the staff recommendations1.

BACKGROUND
GreenWaste of Palo Alto (GWPA) is the City’s exclusive contractor for the collection and processing of recyclable, compostable, deconstruction, and construction and demolition materials, as well as the collection of landfill waste. The processing of landfill materials is handled through a separate contract with GreenWaste Recovery, approved by City Council in May 2021.2
GWPA was awarded the contract as the City’s waste collector in 20093 after a competitive solicitation process, and the contract now has been extended and amended multiple times. The previous waste collector, Waste Management, purchased the local company, PASCO, in 1998 which had provided services to the City for the prior 50+ years. Long-term contracts for waste collection and processing services are very common in the waste industry and are often extended due to key factors that provide benefits and stability for both the service provider and the municipality receiving the services.

For the City, the GWPA contract has locked in an efficient, stable, and consistent high-quality service, innovative processing facilities, predictable pricing, and the ability to expand on services to achieve the City’s zero waste and sustainability goals. This has helped with long- term budgeting and protected the City from volatile market prices, and the cost volatility and risks associated with competitive bidding processes. GWPA benefited and strategizes on how 1 Finance Committee, November 4, 2025; Agenda Item #2 SR# 2508-5141 https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=234337&repo=r-704298fc 2 City Council, May 24, 2021; Agenda Item #7 SR# 11632
https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=111&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=f67bbe6c-6101-4693- 992e-41d7e67b0dea
3 City Council, August 4, 2008 SR # 329:08
https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=45637&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=ce9e88b1-f487-42c4- a940-7e4bb38886cd
best to manage the waste collected and processed through its specialized collection vehicles, containers, and the materials processing facilities.

Long-term contracts provide service providers the financial security to make large investments in equipment, and the predictable revenue stream allows them to secure financing and amortize the cost over many years. GWPA has also benefited in helping the City implement ground-breaking services and pilot programs that have helped the City achieve its current diversion rate of 88%.7 The contract was amended and extended in 2019, which extended the contract through June 30, 20268, added new services (including an enhanced Clean Up Day collection and deconstruction services), added new staffing to help the City achieve increased compliance with zero waste requirements, and included vehicle replacements to the GWPA fleet including electric vehicles. The contract was most recently amended on December 12, 20229 to implement domestic recycling of mixed paper and mixed rigid plastics. Another development is that as of February 2024 the GWPA drivers are unionized.

The City Council approved a limited-term site license agreement for the Los Altos Treatment Plant (LATP) in 201610 providing GWPA the use of the site for the storage of containers. In January 2024, the Revocable Non-Exclusive License for the Use of Real Property (License) was approved for GWPA to remain at LATP, located at 1237 San Antonio Road, through June 30, 2026.11

ANALYSIS
GWPA’s past amendments and term extensions have mutually benefited both the City and GWPA. Similarly, this next (and final), term extension leverages the experience and trust for this contract to continue an additional four years from July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2030, with a vetted contractor that has allowed competitive rates in comparison to neighboring jurisdictions, and provided high quality performance and consistent service reliability and responsiveness to the City and the community. The 2019 contract extension8 anticipated the possibility of the City taking action on extending the contract term with GWPA and included the ability for the City to extend the term up to four additional years without altering any of the terms or provisions in the agreement. Staff considered multiple options and alternatives to extending the term, from 7 Zero Waste Progress Report;
https://www.paloalto.gov/Departments/Public-Works/Zero-Waste/About-Us/Progress-Report#section-2 8 Special Meeting, January 22, 2019; Agenda Item #6 SR# 9752 https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=1255&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=8216bcb1-8849-4202- b596-749b4433572c
9 City Council, December 12, 2022; Agenda Item #1 SR# 14834 https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=59016&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=cee672d4-f264-40ed- bd45-89fa3a3cab48
10 City Council, August 15, 2016; Agenda Item # 6 SR# 7082 https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=51271&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=3f34a385-bc93-4108- b2e4-66a74c29a083
considering conducting a formal solicitation process to exploring various lengths of time to extend the contract and ultimately determined its recommendation that the option that most benefits and provides the best contract flexibility to the City is the last option listed in Table 1, which is to extend the GWPA contract for four years and accommodate some contract requests from GWPA that provides the continuity of services to the community while minimizing financial impacts to both the City and GWPA.

Table 1: Summary of Options Considered for the Contract Amendment Options Considered Challenges
Extend contract 2 years and
initiate new solicitation
Most costly to the City due to procurement process, transition, and less advantages to the City
Estimated cumulative additional increased costs of 15 to 20% No economies of scale of combining solid waste contracts Less time to align with City goals with innovation and improvement to the waste industry from artificial intelligence Extend contract 4 years with
current services (no
compensation changes)
Financially beneficial to the City since it would minimize expenses
Increased risk of collection service issues with aging vehicles Increased risk of operational difficulties vehicle breakdowns, potential unsafe conditions, increased maintenance needs, and environmental violations
Extend agreement 4 years, use
the 10-year industry standard for
vehicle replacements and create
specific parameters to determine
which vehicles should be
replaced by GWPA
(Recommended)
Process for vehicle replacements is described in the current agreement
Compromise approach for both City and GWPA
Increased expenses on vehicle replacement, and container replacements
The last option in Table 1 is staff’s recommendation, which would extend the agreement with GWPA for an additional four years and provide the opportunity for the City to achieve several strategic objectives, including the following:
Ensure the continuity and reliability of essential services, control expenses to the City, and lessen disruptions to residents and businesses;
Maintain price stability by continuing a predictable compensation amount; further protects the City from the current market, tariffs, and labor volatility; Continue to benefit from the local processing facilities with close proximity to Palo Alto as well as the current structure for materials processing expenses. It maintains and continues the processing commitments for recyclable, compostables, and construction and demolition materials at the GreenWaste processing facilities located in San Jose; Provide staff more time to develop a long-term vision and strategy for solid waste management services beyond 2030 and enable the consolidation of all the solid waste collection and processing services into one new future contract. This would combine the services that are currently provided by GWPA and the GreenWaste Recovery contract that handles the processing of landfill materials and will end on June 30, 2030.17 In addition, it will provide staff the opportunity to strategize into the future solicitation process the benefits from artificial intelligence being developed in the solid waste field. Enable staff to explore post-2030 zero waste goals and determine how best to enhance sustainability efforts to further reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Staff held multiple discussions with GWPA over numerous months, and continues to work with GWPA with the mutual goal of a contract term extension and continuing existing services while minimizing increased expenses to the City and managing the financial impacts to GWPA operations and services. The recommendations reflect a strategy to reduce the frequency of vehicle replacements and align it with solid waste industry standards of a ten-year replacement schedule instead of using an eight-year replacement schedule. Initial discussions contemplated the eight-year replacement lifespan of approximately 50 vehicles, which would have led to additional expenses to the City above $21 million over the extended term. The current recommendations significantly reduce these costs for the City in the final extended term of the contract.

The initial GWPA contract was for an eight-year term starting in 2009 and included both newly purchased vehicles as well as nine used vehicles obtained from the previous hauler. The replacement of collection vehicles is allowed in the current agreement with GWPA and has been approved in the past by the City both administratively through an approval letter from the Public Works Director as well as through City Council action as was last done through the contract amendment in 2019.

At the end of the GWPA contract term, the City will have the option to either acquire the vehicles from GWPA or to instruct them to sell the vehicles and provide the City with the amount received for the sale. The contract requires that GWPA obtain from the City approval to use any vehicles that exceed eight years of age. Given that the additional four-year term impacts the current fleet vehicle lifespan, and with the industry standard being ten years, staff recommends replacing the vehicles reaching ten years of age during the additional term and proposes one exception, which is to replace the rear loader electric vehicle sooner than the ten-year standard life. For the remaining fleet vehicles, both for collection and support, it is recommended to address potential repairs and maintenance issues by allocating some additional expenses for vehicle repair and maintenance during the extended term.

The following sections describe the estimated proposed GWPA additional compensation for Fiscal Year 2026 and during the four-year term extension, which are also summarized in Table 2:
17 GreenWaste LATP License 2024
https://paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/public-works/staff-reports-all/2025/greenwaste-license-final.pdf Replacement of Nine Collection Vehicles – Estimated Total Expense of $5,900,000, with approximately $2,610,000 in current Fiscal Year 2026, and $3,290,000 in the Extended Term GWPA’s collection services for recyclables, compostables, landfill, and construction and demolition materials are provided through the use of 60 vehicles, 37 of which are collection vehicles and 23 of which are support vehicles. GWPA vehicles are aging and reaching the standard 10-year life for collection vehicles, and GWPA has requested that some vehicles be replaced to maintain their service reliability. The number and type of vehicles proposed to be replaced has been discussed and reviewed between staff and GWPA to minimize expenses to the City as well as to ensure the continuity of collection services while also reducing the risks of not replacing the remaining aging vehicles that tend to incrementally need increased repairs, or for the vehicle replacements to be compromised with a supply chain or tariff issue. The nine collection vehicles proposed to be replaced are 24% of the total collection vehicles used by GWPA and include four automatic side-loaders used for residential collection that will reach the 10-year replacement criterion in 2026.

GWPA has requested an exception to the 10-year replacement schedule for one collection vehicle that will not reach the 10-year replacement schedule until 2029 – an electric rear-loader vehicle used for the daily Clean Up Day collection. The GWPA fleet has eight electric vehicles in total including five collection vehicles. The implementation of electric collection vehicles into the GWPA fleet has been challenging and has led to significantly more maintenance challenges with the electric vehicles than originally anticipated. The vehicles were some of the first electric vehicles to be manufactured and implemented into a hauler fleet to be used for collection of refuse materials. The electric rear-loader vehicle recommended for replacement was purchased in 2019 from BYD and has regular reliability issues and significant downtime, including both major and minor repairs. These have included problems with the transmission, motor, batteries system, voltage cables and variety of parts replacements that must come from the manufacturer in China (which can take weeks to arrive). GWPA does not have a spare rear loader vehicle and other vehicles in the fleet cannot perform the same services, which leads to additional time and expenses to either obtain a temporary vehicle from another GreenWaste collection service or rent a rear loader vehicle. The recommendation also includes replacing four vehicles in 2028 including one side-loader residential vehicle, two front-loader vehicles used for commercial collection, and one roll-off vehicle used to pick up large debris boxes with deconstruction, construction, and demolition materials.

During the term of its contract with GWPA, the City has used two different methods for covering vehicle replacement expenses. These options are detailed in Table 2 along with their respective positive and negative impacts.

Table 2: Summary of Options Considered for Vehicle Replacement Expenses Options
Considered
Advantages & Disadvantages
Use Refuse Fund
rate stabilization
reserves
(Recommended)
Advantages:
GWPA has an open vehicle order and the initial four vehicles could be put into operation as early as Spring 2026; Refuse Fund reserves are able to sustain the expense
Estimated total cost impact, in addition to direct vehicle costs, of $600,000 considering foregone investment income from Refuse Fund reserves Payment based on invoices as vehicles are received by GWPA Disadvantages:
Large impact to the Refuse Fund with an estimated $5,900,000 expense over the extended term that reduces the rate stabilization reserves as vehicles are ordered and expenses are incurred
Amortization or
smoothing the
cost of vehicles
over the term
Advantages:
Spreads the cost and depreciation of the expensive specialized collection vehicles across the 4.25 years of the proposed term, Fiscal Years 2026 through 2030
Reduces the expense impact on the Refuse Fund rate stabilization reserves Enables a predictable and consistent operating budget for the Refuse Fund Disadvantages:
Adds the complexity of requiring GWPA to obtain a loan with interest which would be a pass-through expense to the City
Estimated total cost impact, in addition to direct vehicle cost, of $1,100,000 considering interest payments on 7% loan and foregone investment income from Refuse Fund reserves
Staff recommends the first option presented in Table 2, which would compensate GWPA for the vehicle replacements based on the invoice price as the vehicles are received into the fleet over the proposed extended term of the contract (some in Fiscal Year 2026 plus some during the proposed recommended extended 4-year term to end in Fiscal Year 2030). This option reduces the City’s overall expenses that would be incurred with the amortizing option of spreading the interest and financing debt over the extended term, with an estimated difference in total cost impact of approximately $500,000. This approach aligns the replacement timing with the vehicle 10-year lifecycle, offers a consistent and manageable framework for expenses that is similar to the recent process used for the vehicle replacements approved in 2019, and uses the Refuse Fund reserves to minimize the financial strain on the Refuse Fund and ratepayers.

The proposed estimated expenses would be incurred by the City in Fiscal Years 2026, 2027, and 2028.

The following requests for additional compensation to GWPA require City Council approval:

Vehicle Repair and Maintenance for the Aging Fleet – Estimated Total Expense of $1,400,589 with $82,688 in current Fiscal Year 2026 and $1,317,900 in the Extended Term As many of the GWPA fleet vehicles continue to age, it is anticipated that they will require incremental repairs and maintenance, additional parts, and other non-routine increased upkeep. Maintenance of collection vehicles can escalate rapidly due to the failure of major components such as engines, hydraulics, and transmissions. The proposed estimated expenses in Table 3 include GWPA’s anticipated replacement of major vehicle parts, repairs and their associated increased labor expenses. This request is a result of a compromise approach to limit the number of vehicle replacements and acceptance to a ten-year replacement schedule, which is the industry standard, instead of an eight-year vehicle replacement schedule contemplated and initially requested from GWPA.

Container Replacement for the Commercial Sector – Estimated Total Expense of $232,000 in the Extended Term
The containers, also known as “bins” to customers, that are provided to the commercial customers, including businesses and multi-family complexes, vary in size, material type, and service needs of the customer. Some of the commercial containers out in the field are still from 2009 when the GWPA contract first began.

Table 3 reflects the proposed additional expenses for the last quarter in current Fiscal Year 2026 and the following four Fiscal Years of the extended term.

Table 3: GWPA Additional Compensation Requests Distributed by Fiscal Year Items Estimated Additional Expenses
FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Total
Vehicle repair &
maintenance
$82,688 $213,500 $222,100 $277,300 $373,000 $1,168,589
Bin replacements $58,000 $58,000 $58,000 $58,000 $232,000 Vehicle replacements $2,610,000 $570,000 $2,720,000 $5,900,000 Total $2,692,688 $841,500 $3,000,100 $335,300 $431,000 $7,300,589 Attachment A is the draft contract amendment reflecting the staff recommendation, and Attachment B is a draft letter that would authorize GreenWaste to proceed with the recommended program of vehicle replacements.

Amendment No. 1 to the Revocable non-exclusive License for GWPA to continue using a portion of LATP Located at 1237 San Antonio Road
GWPA utilizes the site at LATP for charging electric vehicles, storing containers, and serving as a transitional yard to temporarily hold illegally disposed items collected by staff. On June 12, 2023, the City Council approved a HomeKey Lease Agreement with LifeMoves for the use of the LATP site.19 The project required GWPA to relocate to a different area of the LATP site and a new license agreement was approved for the relocation while HomeKey is under construction.20 Once the HomeKey project is finalized, GWPA will relocate to a new, approximately 52,246 square foot premise adjacent to the HomeKey Project. New EV chargers for the GWPA electric vehicles have been installed and will be used by GWPA. Staff proposes extending the license agreement (Attachment C) on substantially the same terms as the current agreement, to expire in 2030 concurrently with the agreement.

During the Finance Committee discussion, there were questions about the square footage of the LATP Area C needed by Greenwaste, and whether there could be space for parking or storage of oversized vehicles. Greenwaste does need to fully use the Area C location included in the license agreement. However, approval of the license agreement extension does not foreclose the possibility of using part of the former LATP site for oversized vehicle program needs. Although there are challenges around environmental remediation, wetlands mitigation, and costs due to the half-ownership of LATP by the Refuse Fund, the potential use of Area B, where Greenwaste has been temporarily operating during the Homekey construction, can be considered as part of staff and the City Council’s efforts to address oversized vehicles issues and has been referred to that team’s work.

Zero Waste Services and Future Major Projects Timeline
Extending the GWPA agreement term to end in June 2030 will ensure continuity of essential waste collection services for the community and enable a long-term strategy to consolidate the currently separate collection and processing contracts. Table 4 is an estimated timeline and plan for upcoming major projects for the Refuse Fund.

Table 4: Timeline of Major Projects for the Refuse Fund Projects Timeline
Refuse Fund Cost of Service Study update to Finance Committee. January/February 2026 Engagement with the community and City Council on considerations for changes to the future solid waste contract service and to develop a new zero waste vision post-2030 (the current Zero Waste Plan,21 as established in Staff Report 8988, sets targets through 2030).

January to September 2027
19 Special Meeting, June 12, 2023; Agenda Item #14 SR #2308-1895 https://portal.laserfiche.com/Portal/DocView.aspx?id=66472&repo=r-704298fc&searchid=5b240db9-addd-4672- b240-2414376bba3c
21 GreenWaste LATP License 2024
https://paloalto.gov/files/assets/public/v/1/public-works/staff-reports-all/2025/greenwaste-license-final.pdf Begin solicitation process for new consolidated contract for collection, processing and disposals services for landfill, recyclable, compostable, deconstruction, and construction and demolition materials.

New Zero Waste vision post 2030 is approved.

January to June 2028
Finance Committee and City Council review and approve finalized and negotiated consolidated agreement for solid waste services.

January to June 2029
Current solid waste contracts with GreenWaste Recovery for garbage processing and disposal ends.

June 30, 2030
Proposed amended contract with GWPA ends. June 30, 2030 New consolidated solid waste contract begins. July 1, 2030

FISCAL/RESOURCE IMPACT
Table 5 provides the estimated proposed additional GWPA compensation for current Fiscal Year 2026 and the extended 4-year term.

Table 5: Proposed GWPA Compensation for the Extended Term FY 2026
(Current
contract term)
FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030
GWPA estimated annual
compensation for current services
(without additional new expenses)
$22,900,000 $23,701,500 $24,531,053 $25,389,639 $26,278,277 Additional vehicle repair and
maintenance and bin
replacements (also included in
Table 3)
$82,688 $271,500 $280,100 $335,300 $431,000
Additional vehicle replacements
(also included in Table 3) $2,610,000 $570,000 $2,720,000 Subtotal of Estimated additional
compensation $2,692,688 $841,500 $3,000,100 $335,300 $431,000 Total $25,592,698 $24,543,000 $27,531,153 $25,724,939 $26,709,277 In Fiscal Year 2026, the additional one-time compensation recommendation of $2,692,688, can be accommodated using Refuse Fund reserves, but requires a budget amendment for the additional expense. Appropriations for subsequent contract years will be determined through the annual budget development process and are subject to Council approval.

The Refuse Fund beginning Fiscal Year 2026 rate stabilization reserve (RSR) balance is $15.5 million and exceeds the recommended guideline range of ten to twenty percent of sales, which is estimated at $6.8 million. The Fund has not implemented residential rate increases since Fiscal Year 2018 and commercial rate increases since Fiscal Year 2017. A cost-of-service study is being conducted, and staff expects to bring the results to the Finance Committee at the beginning of calendar year 2026.

The current contract, which staff proposes to extend, has resulted in competitive rates for Palo Alto ratepayers. Table 6 provides a summary of FY 2025 residential rates for Palo Alto and neighboring cities. Approximately 88% of Palo Alto residential ratepayers are under the 20 or 32 gallon cart rates. The comparison does not capture any FY 2026 rate increases implemented in other cities, while Palo Alto did not have a FY2026 rate increase. Additionally, Palo Alto funds its exceptional Household Hazardous Waste program and street sweeping services through its refuse rates, while many other cities have alternative funding sources for these programs.

Given the current Refuse Fund RSR balance, the recommended contract amendment and vehicle replacement are not expected to be a near-term driver for rate increases, although the cost-of-service-study underway and planning for anticipated cost increases under a new 2030 contract will incorporate any appropriate adjustments and/or increases.

Table 6: Fiscal Year 2025 Refuse/Solid Waste Rates
Supersaver
(20-24 gallon)
Small
(32-35 gallon)
Medium
(65-65 gallon)
Large
(95-96 gallon)
Palo Alto $27.81 $50.07 $100.15 $150.22
Hayward $31.20 $45.59 $81.31 $116.99
Los Altos $47.58 $51.26 $102.49 $153.76
Los Gatos $42.72 $53.22 $97.15 $141.09
Menlo Park $50.31 $58.64 $73.93 $92.21
Mountain View $34.90 $46.55 $93.10 $139.65
Redwood City $30.87 $52.86 $80.20 $107.31
San Jose N/A $53.45 $106.90 $160.35
Santa Clara $43.61 $51.51 $75.83 $100.05
Saratoga $44.95 $55.81 $101.81 $147.80
Sunnyvale $40.00 $46.43 $54.56 N/A
Average $39.40 $51.40 $87.95 $130.94
The initial premises and the new premises where GWPA will relocate to within LATP are located on a portion of the LATP that is half owned by the Refuse Fund. The Refuse Fund will pay for the $1,930 real estate license preparation fee identified in the City’s Fiscal Year 2026 Adopted Municipal Fee Schedule.

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Stakeholder engagement with GWPA is ongoing and conducted regularly through discussions and meetings. Community engagement is also ongoing, with community members communicating directly with GWPA and the City about the services provided.

Stakeholder engagement for the LATP license included meetings with GWPA as the Homekey project progresses.

Staff presented its recommendations to the Finance Committee on November 4, 2025, and there were no public comments.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council action on this item is not a project under CEQA because it is an administrative activity that will result in no indirect or direct physical changes in the environment. See CEQA guidelines section 15378(b)(5).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. C09124501A with GreenWaste of Palo Alto Attachment B: Approval Letter to GWPA for vehicle replacements Attachment C: Amendment No. 1 to the Revocable non-exclusive license for GreenWaste of Palo Alto to continue using a portion of LATP located at 1237 San Antonio Road, an additional four years to end June 30, 2030
APPROVED BY:

Brad Eggleston, Director Public Works/City Engineer

← All documents from this meeting