Town of Paradise
Town Council Meeting Agenda
6:00 PM – October 14, 2025
Town of Paradise Council Chamber – 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA
Meeting Procedures
I. The Mayor is the Presiding Chair and is responsible for maintaining an orderly meeting. The Mayor calls the meeting to order and introduces each item on the agenda.
II. The Town staff then provides a report to Council and answers questions from the Council.
III. Citizens are encouraged to participate in the meeting process and are provided several opportunities to address Council. Any speaker addressing the Council is limited to three minutes per speaker - fifteen minutes per agenda item A. If you wish to address the Council regarding a specific agenda item, please complete a “Request to Address Council” card and give it to the Town Clerk prior to the beginning of the meeting. This process is voluntary and allows for citizens to be called to the speaker podium in alphabetical order.
Comments and questions from the public must be directed to the Presiding Chair and Town Council Members (please do not address staff.) Town staff is available to address citizen concerns Monday through Thursday at Town Hall between the hours of 8am and 5pm.
B. If you wish to address Council regarding an item not on the agenda, you may do so under Item 4, “Public Communication.” Again, please fill out a card and give it to the Town Clerk before the meeting. State Law prohibits Council action on items not listed on a public agenda.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance, persons who need special accommodations to participate in the Town Council meeting may contact the Town Clerk at least three business days prior to the date of the meeting to provide time for any such accommodation.
Interim Town Manager, Michael O’Brien
Town Attorney, Scott E. Huber
Town Clerk/Elections Official, Melanie Elvis
CDD, Planning & Onsite, Susan Hartman
CDD, Building & Code Enforcement, Tony Lindsey
Finance Director/Town Treasurer, Aimee Beleu
Public Works Director/Town Engineer, Marc Mattox
Division Chief, CAL FIRE/Paradise Fire, Jason Finney
Chief of Police, Eric Reinbold
Recovery & Economic Development Director, Colette Curtis Human Resources & Risk Management Director, Crystal Peters Information Systems Director, Luis Marquez
Mayor, Steve Crowder
Vice Mayor, Steve “Woody” Culleton
Council Member, Greg Bolin
Council Member, Heidi Lange
Council Member, Ronald Lassonde
1 1. OPENING
1a. Call to Order
1b. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 1c. Invocation
1d. Roll Call
1e. Doug Speicher from NRWS to speak on state-mandated organics collection.
1f. p6 Camp Fire Recovery Updates - Written reports are included in the agenda packet.
Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic Development Director - recovery projects, advocacy, economic recovery and development, communications, emergency operations and Housing updates.
Marc Mattox, Public Works Director/Town Engineer -infrastructure and sewer updates.
1g. p15 Paradise Sewer Project update by Town Engineer Marc Mattox.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
One roll call vote is taken for all items. Consent items are considered to be routine business that does not call for discussion.
2a. p17 Approve minutes of the September 9, 2025 Special and Regular Town Council meetings. (Melanie Elvis/Town Clerk)
2b. p25 Approve September 2025 Cash Disbursements in the amount of $5,072,626.32. (Aimee Beleu/Finance Director)
2c. p33 1. Waive second reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. 649 and approve reading by title only; and, 2. Adopt Town Ordinance No. 649, " An Ordinance Amending Text Regulations within Paradise Municipal Code Title 17 of the Paradise Municipal Code Relative to Temporary Storage Yards for Work in Public and Private Rights-of-Way”. (Susan Hartman/Community Development Director)
2d. p36 Accept the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant award for $45,000 from the California Office of Traffic Safety. (Eric Reinbold/Police Chief)
2e. p59 Concur with staff recommendation to file a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Pentz Road Widening Project. (Marc Mattox/Town Engineer) 2f. p139 1. Approve the revised Program Supplement Agreement No. F020 Rev. 2 to the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects, Agreement No. 03-5425F15 for the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project - CML 5425(043); and, 2. Adopt Resolution 2025-__ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise authorizing the Town Manager of the Town of Paradise or their designee to sign the revised Program Supplement Agreement No. F020 Rev. 2 to the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects, Agreement No. 03-5425F15 for the Go 2 3
Paradise: Neal Gateway Project - CML 5425(043).” (Marc Mattox/Town Engineer)
2g. p152 Adopt Resolution No. 2025-___ “A resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise to submit a main and sub HOME Investment Partnerships Program Income only applications to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development in order to commit HOME Program Income funds to eligible HOME program activities, and if approved, to execute a standard agreement, any amendments thereto and of any related documents necessary to participate in the home program.” (Colette Curtis/Recovery and Economic Development Director)
2h. p156 1. Concur with staff’s recommendation to extend the HQE Systems contract for construction of the town Emergency Warning Sirens to January 15, 2026; and, 2. Approve the sixth amendment to the Agreement between Town of Paradise and HQE Systems; and, 3. Authorize the Town Manager to execute the contract extension. (Colette Curtis/Recovery & Economic Development Director)
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
For matters that are not on the Council business agenda, speakers are allowed three (3) minutes to address the Council. The Town Council is prohibited from taking action on matters that are not listed on the public agenda. The Council may briefly respond for clarification and may refer the matter to the Town staff.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
For items that require a published legal notice and/or a mailed notice.
Public Hearing Procedure:
A. Staff Report
B. Mayor opens the hearing for public comment in the following order i. Ask Town Clerk if there are any cards submitted
ii. Ask if there is anyone else wishing to comment
C. Mayor closes the hearing
D. Council discussion and vote
5a. p159 1. Conduct a public hearing to receive comment on the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. 2. Authorize the Town Manager to submit the CAPER to the Department of Housing and Urban Development with any public comments received; or, 3. Provide alternative direction. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Colette Curtis/Recovery and Economic Development Director)
5b. p181 1. Conduct a public hearing to solicit comments regarding a proposed Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Plans; and 2. Adopt the Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Annual Plans; and 3.
Authorize staff to submit the Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Annual Plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, including any comments received during the 30-day public 3 comment period. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Colette Curtis/Recovery and Economic Development Director)
5c. p185 1. Conduct duly noticed public hearing; and, Concur with the project “CEQA determination” finding embodied within Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-07; and, 2. Concur with the project recommended General Plan Land Use Map amendment and rezone action adopted by the Planning Commission on September 16, 2025, and embodied within Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-07; and, 3. Adopt Town of Paradise Resolution No. 2025-_______, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Amending the Land Use Map of the 1994 Paradise General Plan (Mahoney Capital LP: PL25-00056)” 4. Waive the first reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. ____ and read by title only; and,
5. Introduce Town of Paradise Ordinance No. _____ “An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Real Property From “TR-1/2” (Town Residential 1/2-acre minimum) to the “M-F” (Multiple-Family Residential) Zone Pursuant to Paradise Municipal Code Sections 17.45.500 Et. Seq. (Mahoney Capital LP: PL25-00056)”; or, 6. Adopt an alternative directive to town staff. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Susan Hartman/Community Development Director)
6. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Action items are presented by staff and the vote of each Council Member must be announced. A roll call vote is taken for each item on the action calendar. Citizens are allowed three (3) minutes to comment on agenda items.
6a. p200 1. Consider approving the Notice of Vacancy created by a Committee Member’s resignation; and, 2. Approve the Measure V application and authorize staff to advertise the Measure V Committee vacancy; and, 3.
Designate two Town Council Members to serve on an interview panel for the Measure V interview process; and, 4. Schedule appointment to the vacancy at the December 9, 2025 Regular Town Council meeting with appointment to become effective immediately. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Melanie Elvis/Town Clerk)
6b. p204 1. Consider authorizing the Interim Town Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Rebuild Paradise Foundation for Insurance Advocacy Work; and 2. Give direction to staff to create an Insurance Committee to further Insurance Advocacy for the Town. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Colette Curtis/Recovery & Economic Development Director)
6c. p212 1. Review the Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Draft provided by Abaris Group; and, 2. Accept the Plan as a complete and Final Draft; or
3. Provide alternative direction to staff. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Colette Curtis/Recovery & Economic Development Director)
6d. p315 1. Receive and file the progress report of the Ad Hoc Facilities Committee. 2. Authorize $50,000 for immediate security upgrades at Town Hall (controlled access, counter glass, and Clerk’s Office escape route). 3.
Provide direction on whether the Corporation Yard and Fire Station 82 projects should proceed sequentially with the Facilities Master Plan or in parallel. 4. Establish a Long-Range Facilities Fund in the amount of $9,339,742 (inclusive of $2,774,292 previously received and $6,565,450 4 5 received in 2024/2025). (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc Mattox/Town Engineer)
6e. p321 1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-____ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Adopting a Town Purchasing Policy”; and, 2. Direct Staff to return with an amendment to Paradise Municipal Code 2.45 to ensure consistency with the Purchasing Policy; or 3. Provide and alternative directive to town staff. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Aimee Beleu/Finance Director)
6f. p383 1. Ratify the Agreement with Michael O’Brien for Interim Town Manager Services; or 2. Provide alternative direction. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney)
6g. p391 1. Ratify the Adjustment to Compensation for Eric Reinbold for Acting Town Manager services; or 2. Provide alternative direction. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney)
7. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS AND REPORTS
7a. Council initiated agenda items
7a1. Discussion on the use of unlicensed contractors for weed abatement in the Town of Paradise. (LASSONDE)
7b. Council reports on committee representation
7c. Future Agenda Items
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
8a. Town Manager Report
9. CLOSED SESSION - None
10. ADJOURNMENT
5 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 1(f)
ORIGINATED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic
Development Director
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Monthly Recovery Update
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None
Background:
This report continues the Monthly Updates provided to keep the Town Council apprised of important developments related to the recovery of the Town of Paradise from the Camp Fire.
Included in this update are items related to recovery projects, advocacy economic recovery and development, communications and emergency operations.
Analysis:
ECONOMC DEVELOPMENT
CDBG-DR Economic Development
The Town of Paradise submitted an application for a Workforce Training Center, located on the Paradise High School campus.
The project is a partnership between the Town of Paradise, Butte College, PUSD, Valley Contractors Workforce Foundation, and Alliance for Workforce Development. Town Staff are currently working with HCD to amend the scope of the project between partners.
Classes are anticipated to begin in January 2026 at existing locations, while preconstruction efforts begin at the High School.
Healthcare
The Town of Paradise and Adventist Health Feather River Foundation are working together to create a Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan to assess current inventory, exiting gaps, projections, and a strategic plan for filling the gaps. The draft plan is on tonight’s agenda for Council review.
Utility Box Mural Program
6 Utility boxes were wrapped with local artwork on Thursday July 31st. The locations are:
o Skyway/Neal (artist Libby Sofer)
o Oliver (artist Emily Wycoff)
6 o Pearson (artist Jenn Ponci)
o Elliot (artist Patti Lloyd)
o Maxwell (artist Shelley Miller)
o Black Olive (artist Steve Ferchaud)
Another call to artists will be extended later this month, with installation expected in Spring 2025.
Downtown Strategy Phase 3
Council approved moving forward on Phase 3 of the downtown strategy at the March 2025 meeting.
The working group has met several times, and has also visited several example sites such as Meriam Park, Mitote Food Park, The Barlow, and Oxbow Market. More example site visits are planned over the next month both in person and virtually. A public input process will begin later this month at community events, an online survey, and a virtual open house.
RECOVERY
Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Mitigation Planning Public Services (CDBG DR MIT PPS)
Long Term Community Recovery Plan Update
o An RFP was issued for this work, a contract will come before Council at the November meeting for award.
In Home Siren Units
o The Standard Agreement for funding for additional in-home siren units has been received, this will extend the number of units made available to residents with another 2,800 units available.
Public Services
o The Standard Agreement for funding for a public services grant has been received. This will allow the Town to grant funding to local groups for hazard mitigation work within the community.
Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation Grant
Town was awarded $739,680 through the Extreme Heat and Community Resilience Program
Funding will be used to create a Climate Resilience Plan which will identify prospective resiliency projects such as
o Community Evacuation/Cooling/Heating Centers
o Shade Tree Planting
o Fuels Reduction Projects
o Green space projects
The Town is partnered with RCAC to do public outreach and complete the plan by December 2025
Identified projects may be eligible for future implementation funds through the same grant source.
The partnership agreement has been signed with partners RCAC, Paradise Recreation and Park District, and Campfire Collaborative.
A Core Project team has been formed which includes the partners listed above in addition to Fire Safe Council, Cal Fire, Chico State, and local tribes. A Public Input process will begin in February 2026
7 Overall Hazard Mitigation Project Update
Years of efforts are complete on the pre-award work on all our projects. All projects are fully approved and funded.
Category 4 Tree Removal Program
Project implementation is ongoing.
As of October, approximately 8.000 trees have been removed from 300 parcels. 7-10 different tree removal crews are working across town in an efficient and effective partnership with property owners, local agencies, tribes, and contractors. Currently projecting to be complete with tree removal by October 15th.
Emergency Warning System
All 21 Towers are standing and operational.
21 of the 21 Towers are now fully complete.
All active construction is complete.
In-home units are being registered by TOP property owners. 250 units have been requested so far.
An additional 2,800 units been applied for through CDBG DR MIT PPS and are currently awaiting final approval.
Residential Ignition Resistant Retrofit Program
Project is fully funded and moving forward.
97 of the 98 properties been approved to move forward to construction. Notice to proceed letters are being issued to these properties as soon as property owner is ready to move into construction.
50 Properties have selected their contractors and have had their "Notice to Proceed" Letters issued.
23 Properties have been fully completed.
Hazardous Fuels Reduction Program
Project is fully funded and moving forward.
Town staff are working with involved monitoring tribes on a plan and timeline for implementation.
Town staff are working on revising the scope of work to move forward with the project.
Defensible Space Code Enforcement
The Defensible Space Code Enforcement project was fully approved and obligated in November 2023 by FEMA and CalOES.
Town Council approved implementation plan in January 2024. Grant funded staff have been hired and are in place and working in the community. In May a Notice of Intent was submitted to Cal OES to request an additional 3 years of funding for this program.
In August additional grant funds are being investigated to assist property owners with yearly defensible space compliance costs. If approved, grant sources would be targeted to low-moderate income elderly and disabled property owners. 8 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Implementation for VEOCI, our online EOC software, is ongoing.
Financial Impact:
None.
9 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 1(f)
ORIGINATED BY: Nadia Alekseev, Housing Program Manager
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Housing Recovery Update
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None
Background:
This report provides the Town Council with an update of Housing activities.
Analysis:
We have 40.81% of our pre-disaster housing stock to-date (1,720 surviving units + 3,622 new CofOs [an increase of 36 since last month] to-date = 5,342 habitable dwellings / 13,091 housing units before the Camp Fire). Our total number of habitable dwellings does not include the number of mobile homes replaced in mobile home parks because those permits are issued by HCD instead of the Building Dept., but mobile homes in parks are included in the total number of prefire housing units. An estimate from tax data shows 144 mobile homes in parks, or 5,486 housing units in Paradise.
Town of Paradise Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation/Reconstruction Program ($12.5 million) This program helps homeowners rehabilitate or reconstruct their home. The CalHome-Disaster Assistance grant expires at the end of 2025. New applications to rebuild homes lost in the Camp Fire are no longer being accepted because it’s not feasible to complete a project before the expiration of the grant. Applications for essential home repairs on existing homes will continue to be accepted, funds for this activity are limited but do not have an expiration deadline. 68 homes completed
6 homes in construction
3 applications in process
Town of Paradise First-Time Homebuyer Program ($11 million) Helping to make homeownership more affordable. These are also CalHome-Disaster Assistance funds that have an end of 2025 expenditure deadline. The program will continue after the end of the year using other funding sources, but will be limited to assisting households under 80% AMI. 82 households assisted
13 applications in process
10 CDBG-DR Multifamily Rental Housing Program ($84.7 million) Affordable rental housing. Seven (7) projects are eligible for funding; a total of 292 units. CHIP project- scattered site (4 units)
o leased up in Spring of 2024
Eaglepointe- 5975 Maxwell Dr (43 units)
o Leased up in Spring of 2025
Mayer Commons- 1561 Kay Ct (12 units)
o Tenant Certificate of Occupancy was issued August 1, 2025. Units are being actively leased. Ribbon Cutting Ceremony was held on September 16, 2025. Northwind Senior- 6983 Pentz Rd (21 units)
o Units are being actively leased. Interested applicants should inquire with the Housing Authority.
Cypress Family- 1633 Cypress Ln (70 units)
o Several buildings on the north side have received a Certificate of Occupancy.
Construction is nearing completion on the south side of the project. Interested applicants should contact CHIP.
Clark Rd- 6480 Clark Rd (72 units)
o Loan closing was extended to March of 2026. Construction to begin afterwards. Cypress Senior (phase II)- 1633 Cypress ln (70 units) o Loan closing date is scheduled for Mid-November, construction to begin afterwards.
CDBG (2024 Annual Allocation=$47,069; unspent funds=$140,214.13) CDBG entitlement grants are on a 5-year plan cycle called the Consolidated Plan, and this year is the 5th year in the current plan. The final draft was submitted to HUD in July and is currently under review. The Town received an “untimely” designation due to an accumulation of funds greater than 1.5x the current year grant allocation. The Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and a request for a Substantial Amendment are public hearing items in today’s agenda. The substantial amendment proposes to reallocate $70,000 to another program to spend this fiscal year.
HOME Infill New Construction ($700,000)
Create affordable housing for first-time homebuyers. The grant award letter was finally received from HCD in April of 2025. Program guidelines are complete and were adopted by Council at last month’s meeting. Staff is continuing to work-out funding logistics with HCD. CDBG funds have been allocated to support the HOME program, but it’s taking far longer than expected. Housing staff is proposing to reallocate CDBG funds away from the HOME program in order to comply with HUD’s timeliness requirements. Future CDBG allocations can be committed to support the HOME program once it’s implemented if necessary.
Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) ($399,166)
Allocates matching funds to North Valley Housing Trust to administer for affordable housing projects.
A predevelopment loan of $400,000 has been made for the Cape Cod multi-family project ($200,000 of PLHA funds) Cape Cod was awarded tax credits earlier this year – the last piece of funding needed to start construction.
$75,000 of PLHA funds was loaned to build a small, single-family home, which was finished and sold to a low-income Camp Fire survivor. Housing staff is working with North Valley Housing Trust on another similar project.
Financial Impact:
None.
11 1
TOWN OF PARADISE
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda No. 1(f)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Public Works Director / Town Engineer REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Camp Fire Recovery Updates - Infrastructure
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None, written monthly update only.
Background:
This report continues the Monthly Disaster Recovery Updates provided to keep the Town Council apprised of important developments related to the recovery of the Town of Paradise from the Camp Fire. Changes from the prior month’s reports are shown in red underline italics.
Analysis:
Road Rehabilitation
The Town of Paradise is endeavoring to pave every public road mile by the end of 2026. These projects are funded through Camp Fire Recovery Projects and are sequenced behind undergrounding of utilities and water service later replacements.
As of September 2025, the following paving progress can be reported:
Status Miles
Completed 46.56
Awarded/In-Progress 27.86
Planned 2026 15.30
Planned Future 6.48
Total 96.19
Paradise Town Council has awarded three contracts for 2025 paving efforts, listed below with brief updates:
- Clark Road (Pearson to Wagstaff) – Knife River Construction o Final paving and striping is forecasted for mid-October to November due to weather interruptions.
- On-System Road Rehabilitation – All American Asphalt
o Contract work is progressing well. Staff has directed All American to postpone work along Skyway between north of Center Street and south of Bille Road in addition to Elliott Road between Skyway and Clark to spring 2026. This postponement is in recognition of business impacts benefiting from nightwork 12 2
along Clark Road. Accordingly, the Town of Paradise Public Works Department will pursue a Noise Variance for next spring’s work. These roads are not able to be completed at night in late October/November due to anticipated overnight low temperatures. Roads which are also at risk for postponement due to weather impacts are Bille Road between Skyway and Clark Road as well as southern Pentz Road
- Off-System Road Rehabilitation – DeSilva Gates Construction o Contract work is winding down well ahead of schedule. Punch list items are forecasted to be completed in early November. Project acceptance could occur early next year.
A map of all paving efforts completed and planned can be found on the Town’s website at www.townofparadise.com by visiting “News and Announcements” from the homepage.
Capital Project Updates
The Public Works Department, in an effort to provide additional communications on various projects, has launched a new website under its ParadiseWORKS banner. ParadiseWORKS Engineering Resiliency now hosts individual project pages for current information, project descriptions and schedules. The website can be viewed here:
https://www.townofparadise.com/pwe/page/paradiseworks-engineering-resiliency Below is an abbreviated Project List intended to show the current status of each project. More information on each project’s scope and schedule can be found at. Typical project progressions and timeframes are as follows:
(1) Environmental, 6-24 months
(2) Design, 12 months
(3) Right of Way, 6-12 months
(4) Construction, 6-24 months
Project ID Project Title Project
Phase
Anticipated
Construction
Completion
Year
7303 On-System Road Rehabilitation Construction 2026
7307 Neal Road Rehabilitation Design 2028
8404 Camp Fire Hydrant Repairs Design 2025
8407 Off-System Road Rehabilitation Construction 2026
9389 Pentz Pathway Project Phase II Design 2028
9390 Paradise ATP Gateway Project (Neal Road Class I) Environmental 2028 9391 Oliver Curve Pathway Phase I (Design Only) Design - 9394 Paradise Sewer Project Design -
9424 Skyway Link ATP (Bille to Wagstaff) Environmental 2027 9425 Upper Skyway Widening (Bille to Wagstaff) Environmental 2027 9426 Skyway/Pentz Intersection Improvements Environmental 2028 9427 Pentz Road Widening Environmental 2028
13 3
9428 Roe Road Phase 1 (Pentz to S. Libby) Environmental 2028 9430 Pearson-Hilltop Guard Rail Design 2026
9433 Animal Shelter Expansion Construction 2025
9434 Roe Road Phase 2 (S. Libby to Clark) Environmental 2028 9437 Evacuation Route CMS Environmental 2028
9438 Private Road Identification Safety Project Environmental 2028 9439 Storm Drain Resiliency Project Phase 1 Environmental 2028 Funding Pursuits
Below is a listing of active funding pursuits related to infrastructure recovery and status updates:
Program Project Title Amount
Requested
Anticipated
Award
Notificatio
n
Notes
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Paradise
Sewer Project
$2,000,000 of
$50,000,000
authorization
TBD
Town has started early
coordination for 2027 potential
appropriations
State Water
Board Septic to
Sewer CWSRF
Paradise
Sewer Project $27,000,000 TBD
Work to revise the project
application package is resuming
with new project direction
selected.
14 1
TOWN OF PARADISE
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda No. 1(g)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Public Works Director / Town Engineer REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Paradise Sewer Project Update
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None, written monthly update only.
Background:
This report is a monthly effort to provide additional opportunity for public engagement on the status and next steps of the Paradise Sewer Project.
Analysis:
Since its incorporation in 1979, the Town of Paradise has sought a centralized wastewater system to address failing septic systems that impact public health, groundwater quality, and economic development. The need for sewer service became even more urgent following the 2018 Camp Fire, when the lack of modern wastewater infrastructure emerged as a major barrier to rebuilding businesses, housing, and community resiliency.
In 2022, the Town secured $30 million in CDBG-DR funds to begin pre-construction work, including environmental review, design, and permitting. To provide technical expertise, HDR was retained as Owner’s Agent, and a progressive design-build team was selected to develop a Basis of Design Report. That effort confirmed that a locally managed, phased sewer project was necessary to achieve both affordability and long-term community needs.
In January 2025, the Town Council formed a Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate local treatment and collection alternatives, with strong emphasis on public engagement and cost feasibility. The Committee, working alongside staff, HDR, and the Paradise Irrigation District, conducted community meetings, stakeholder workshops, site tours of other wastewater systems, and a technical alternatives analysis.
In August 2025, the Town Council unanimously voted to concur with the Paradise Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee’s recommendation to direct a revised project description to include hybrid gravity/low pressure collection system, aerated lagoon wastewater treatment, and percolation/ evaporation pond effluent discharge.
Main Accomplishments
Advertised RFQ for procurement of wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) design consultant for design-bid-build project delivery method. Issued notice of contract termination to collection system progressive design-build team per direction from Town Council.
Begin transition of collection system from progressive design-build to design-bid-build project delivery method.
15 2
Prepared Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) draft revised project description.
Continued support for funding and evaluating all project funding options, including meeting with USACE staff to discuss grant funding.
Key Activities (One Month Look-Ahead)
Prepare Alternatives Analysis Summary TM to document alternatives evaluated and recommended Project Description adopted by Town Council on August 14. Ongoing preparation of Administrative Draft SEIR.
Finalize SEIR revised project description.
16 MINUTES
PARADISE TOWN COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING – 5:15 PM – September 9, 2025
1. OPENING
The Special meeting of the Paradise Town Council was called to order by Mayor Crowder at 5:16 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 5555 Skyway, Paradise, California who led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Greg Bolin, Steve “Woody” Culleton, Heidi Lange, Ronald Lassonde and Steve Crowder, Mayor.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Acting Town Manager/Police Chief Eric Reinbold, Town Attorney Scott E. Huber, Town Clerk/Elections Official Melanie Elvis, Human Resources and Risk Management Director Crystal Peters, and Information Systems Director Luis Marquez.
At 5:16 p.m. Mayor Crowder announced that the Town Council would adjourn to Closed Session for the following items:
2. CLOSED SESSION
2a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, the Town Council will hold a closed session to consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, discipline, and/or dismissal of the Town Manager.
Closed Session was recessed for the Regular Town Council meeting at 6:00 p.m.
At 10:00 p.m. Mayor Crowder announced that the Town Council would adjourn back to Closed Session.
After reconvening from Closed Session at 10:50 p.m., Town Attorney Scott E.
Huber announced the following:
1. The Council approved an agreement for interim Town Manager services with Michael O'Brien. The motion was made by Council Member Culleton and seconded by Mayor Crowder. The vote was unanimous in the affirmative approving the agreement. A copy of the agreement can be obtained from the Town Clerk effective immediately.
2. In addition, the Council approved an agreement for temporary acting town manager services with Eric Reinbold. The agreement provides for an increase in base salary of 10% for the time served in the acting Town Manager position as well as a one-time deposit of 120 hours to Reinbold’s vacation balance. The 17 motion was made by Council Member Lange and seconded by Mayor Crowder.
The vote was unanimous in the affirmative. A copy of the agreement can be obtained from the Town Clerk effective immediately.
3. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Crowder adjourned the Special Town Council meeting at 10:52 p.m.
Date approved:
By: Attest:
________________________ _________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
18 TOWN COUNCIL
Meeting Minutes
6:00 PM – September 09, 2025
1. OPENING
The Regular meeting of the Paradise Town Council was called to order by Mayor Crowder at 6:03 p.m. in the Town Council Chamber located at 5555 Skyway, Paradise, California who led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. An invocation was offered by Council Member Lassonde.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Greg Bolin, Steve “Woody” Culleton, Heidi Lange, Ronald Lassonde and Steve Crowder, Mayor
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Acting Town Manager/Police Chief Eric Reinbold, Town Attorney Scott E. Huber, Town Clerk/Elections Official Melanie Elvis, Community Development Director Susan Hartman, Public Works Director/Town Engineer Marc Mattox, Recovery and Economic Development Director Colette Curtis, Finance Director Aimee Beleu, Fire Chief Jason Finney and Information Systems Director Luis Marquez. 1a. Care Net of Paradise Executive Director, Ashley Lundberg and Brooke Garner, Director of Development presented on the organization's work in the community.
1b. Recovery and Economic Development Director Colette Curtis reviewed the requirements for the Transient Occupancy Tax allocation recipients. The following organization provided a verbal report of their expenditure overview summarizing how their allocation was spent over the last year, explaining the impact on tourism and outlining their plans for next year’s funding allocation: Paradise Art Center. The Gold Nugget Museum did not present. 1c. Camp Fire Recovery Updates - Written reports are included in the agenda packet.(160-60-061)
Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic Development Director - recovery projects, advocacy, economic recovery and development, communications, emergency operations and Housing updates.
Marc Mattox, Public Works Director/Town Engineer -infrastructure and sewer updates
19 1d. Town Engineer Marc Mattox provided an update on the Paradise Sewer Project. (960-70-009)
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Culleton, approved consent calendar items 2a through 2c. Roll call vote was unanimous.
2a. Approved minutes of the August 12, 2025 Special and Regular Town Council meetings and the August 14th, August 19th and August 21st, 2025 Special Town Council meetings.
1. Serra Blaine appreciated the Town Attorney for his explanation on a question she had regarding the Closed Session meeting of August 21st. 2b. Approved August 2025 Cash Disbursements in the amount of $18,698,338.80. (310-10-035)
2c. 1. Waived the second reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. 648 and approved reading by title only; and, 2. Adopted Town Ordinance No. 648, "An Ordinance Amending Text Regulations within Paradise Municipal Code Title 17 of the Paradise Municipal Code Relative to the Agricultural Residential Zoning District; General Definitions; and the Animal Regulations”. (540-16-217)
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR - None
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1. Christine Poje commented on home inspections and setback issues on private roads.
2. Jared Kramer commented on financial hardships due to the road construction and asked the Town to create a grant for business owners to help offset losses.
3. Stephanie Rotchy commented on construction issues with her home.
4. Monica Huchro commented on a formal complaint she submitted with the Town.
5. Joseph Butts, a local contractor, commented on his positive interactions with the Town’s building division.
6. Brandon Slater, a local contractor, commented on his positive interactions with the Town’s building division.
7. Shawn Shingler, a local contractor, commented that the way the building division investigation is being handled is causing delays and sending a message that Paradise is unstable and plagued with corruption to prospective buyers.
20 8. John Wulff, a local contractor, commented on his positive interactions with the Town’s building division.
9. Amy Rohrer, a local contractor, commented on her positive interactions with the Town’s building division.
10. Christine Noyer commented on construction issues with her home.
11. Autumn Field spoke in favor of the building division audit and commented on conflict of interest.
12. Ken Klassen spoke on the Fire Victim’s Trust.
13. Misty Wright shared that the Butte County Board of Supervisors has waived library fines through the month of September.
14. Serra Blaine commented on a healthcare grant, and on a previous speaker’s comments.
15. Carrie Max commended the community for its engagement and shared that Paradise Reflections is opening September 11th.
16. Rhonda Berndt de Pineda commented on her positive interactions with the Town’s building division and said that she did not feel the same way about the current contract inspectors.
17. Amanda Clark questioned why Town-contracted weed abatement contractors do not have to be licensed.
18. Laurie Noble commented on Noble Orchards.
5. PUBIC HEARINGS
5a. Community Development Director Susan Hartman introduced the proposed ordinance related to laydown yards.
Mayor Crowder opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
1. Carrie Max spoke in favor of keeping the 10-day notice requirement.
Mayor Crowder closed the public hearing at 7:52 p.m.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Culleton 1. Concurred with the project’s “CEQA determination” finding presented and considered by the Planning Commission on July 15, 2025, and embodied within Planning Commission Resolution No 2025-06; and, 2. Waived the first reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. 649 and read by title only; and, 3. Introduced Town Ordinance No. 649, “An Ordinance Amending Text Regulations within Paradise Municipal Code Title 17 of the Paradise Municipal Code Relative to Temporary Storage Yards for Work in Public and Private Rights-of-Way”.
Roll call vote was unanimous. (540-16-218)
21 6. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
6a. Finance Director Aimee Beleu provided an overview of the 4th Quarter Investment Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Lassonde reviewed and filed the 4th Quarter Investment Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025. Roll call vote was unanimous with Council Member Culleton absent and not voting. (360-30-006)
6b. Finance Director Aimee Beleu provided an overview of the Cost of Services (User Fee) Study Report.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Culleton approved the Cost of Services (User Fee) Study Report prepared by Matrix Consulting Group. Roll call vote was unanimous. (395-20-043)
6c. Town Engineer Marc Mattox provided an overview of the Hazardous Fuels Reduction Services program.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Culleton authorized staff to advertise Contract No. 2025-002 Hazardous Fuels Reduction Services Contract. Roll call vote was unanimous. (440-60-022)
6d. Recovery and Economic Development Director Colette Curtis provided an overview of the proposed (RFP) to update of the Long-Term Community Recovery Plan.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Lassonde authorized Town Staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to update the Long-Term Community Recovery Plan. Roll call vote was unanimous. (420-25-011) 6e. Town Engineer Marc Mattox provided an overview of staff’s recommendation to terminate the Progressive Design Build contract with Mountain Cascade, Inc. and take assignment of the Carollo subcontract, converting the project to a traditional design-bid-build; and, reviewing the RFQ 2025-003 Request for Qualifications for Paradise Sewer Project:
Wastewater Treatment Facility Design Services.
MOTION by Culleton, seconded by Lassonde 1. Delegated authority to the Town Attorney and Acting/Interim Town Manager to terminate the Progressive Design Build contract with Mountain Cascade, Inc. and take assignment of the Carollo subcontract, converting the project to a traditional design-bid-build; and, 2. Approved the RFQ 2025-003 Request for Qualifications for Paradise Sewer Project: Wastewater Treatment Facility Design Services. Roll call vote was unanimous. (960-70-009) 22 7. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS AND REPORTS
7a. Council initiated agenda items:
7a1. Council discussed increasing the allotted number of chickens in Town.
1. Christine Poje spoke in favor of this item.
2. Kevin Steinmen spoke in favor of this item.
3. Kristin Holman spoke in favor of this item.
4. Serra Blaine spoke in favor of this item.
5. Amanda Clark spoke in favor of this item.
6. Carrie Max spoke in favor of this item.
7. Doug Speicher suggested setback requirements be from neighboring dwellings not property lines.
Council provided direction to draft an ordinance to amend chicken coop setback requirements from 75’ to 20’ from neighboring dwellings and to eliminate the current limit on the number of chickens allowed.
7a2. Council discussed proposed uses of adjacently owned lots.
1. Stephanie Rotchy spoke in opposition to this item.
2. Carrie Max spoke in favor of this item.
3. Doung Munjar spoke in favor of this item.
4. Aimee Beleu spoke in opposition to this item.
Council did not have consensus to bring this item back for consideration.
7a3. Council discussed creating an Insurance Advocacy Committee to bring together industry experts, community partners, and local stakeholders to identify and implement practical steps our community can take to become more insurable and actively engage with insurance providers to explore solutions that make homeowners insurance more accessible and affordable for residents.
1. Holly Fisher spoke in favor of this item and encouraged the Town to partner with Rebuild Paradise Foundation in these endeavors.
2. Jared Kramer spoke in favor of this item and encouraged the committee to advocate for not only residential property insurance, but commercial property insurance as well.
Council directed staff to return at the October Council meeting with proposed parameters for an Insurance Advocacy Committee with Council Members Lange and Bolin as the Council representatives. 23 7b. Council reports on committee representation:
Council Member Lange attended multiple sewer ad hoc committee meetings.
Council Member Lassonde participated in the Working Group walkable downtown tour.
Mayor Crowder attended multiple sewer ad hoc committee meetings, had an interview on KPAY regarding the sewer project and presented a proclamation of recognition to Phil Kelly at his 90th birthday party. 7c. Future Agenda Items
1. Discuss unlicensed contractors performing weed abatement for the Town of Paradise. (LASSONDE)
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION - None
9. CLOSED SESSION – None
10. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Crowder adjourned the meeting at 9:59 p.m.
Date approved:
By: Attest:
_______________________ ___________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
24 TOWN OF PARADISE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
September 1, 2025 - September 30, 2025
25 CASH DISBURSEMENTS REPORT
September 1, 2025 - September 30, 2025
Check Date Pay Period End Description Amount Total
9/12/2025 9/7/2025 Net Payroll - Direct Deposits and Checks $ 295,183.95 9/26/2025 9/21/2025 Net Payroll - Direct Deposits and Checks $ 284,438.75 $ 579,622.70
Accounts Payable
Payroll Vendors: Taxes, PERS, Dues, Insurance, Etc. $ 706,551.21 Operations Vendors: Supplies, Contracts, Utilities, Etc. $3,786,452.41 TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $ 4,493,003.62 GRAND TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS $ 5,072,626.32
APPROVED BY:
Aimee Beleu - Finance Director/Town Treasurer
APPROVED BY:
Michael O'Brien - Interim Town Manager
26 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
AP TCB - General Checking
Check
89918 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable 4LEAF, Inc $7,968.00 89919 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable A Stitch Above Embroidery & Shirt Printing
$906.78
89920 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable All-American Construction, Inc. $513,724.07 89921 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Archuleta, Derek, S $494.50 89922 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T $80.86
89923 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - Summary $3,492.60 89924 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Baker Tilly US, LLP - Auditing Services
$1,338.95
89925 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Bidwell Truck & Auto $629.02 89926 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Broad & Gusman $4,000.00 89927 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Bureau Veritas North America, Inc $10,560.00 89928 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable BUTTE COUNTY FIRE SAFE
COUNCIL
$169,720.18
89929 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable BUTTE REGIONAL TRANSIT $139.75 89930 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable BUTTE REGIONAL TRANSIT $146.75 89931 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE
$674.00
89932 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Caltronics Business Systems/J.J. R Ent Inc
$3,309.83
89933 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable CivicPlus, LLC $3,360.00 89934 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Coastland $3,801.39 89935 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Cole Huber LLP $20,606.50 89936 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Consor North America, Inc. $30,422.79 89937 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Corning Ford Inc. $40,937.01 89938 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable De Lage Landen Public Finance LLC $781.25 89939 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY &
FIRE PROTECTION
$6,617.48
89940 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Dokken Engineering, Inc. $58,722.96 89941 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Eidhammer, Trenton $19.00 89942 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Elam IT, Jon, Elam $6,083.73 89943 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Emily Wycoff $300.00 89944 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Enterprise Rancheria Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe
$33,581.25
89945 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable ESPLANADE OFFICE $4,965.98 89946 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC $1,078.32 89947 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Fleming Construction $3,000.00 89948 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORP. $304.52 89949 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable GREEN RIDGE LANDSCAPING $6,765.00 89950 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Greenway Builders LLC $55,000.00 89951 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP $2,625.00 89952 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable HDR Engineering, Inc $120,377.45 89953 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable HLP, INC / CHAMELEON
SOFTWARE PRODUCTS
$3.15
89954 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable INTERSTATE OIL COMPANY $400.68 89955 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. $39,954.01 89956 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable James or Lavenia Riotto $175.00 89957 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable JOHNNY ON THE SPOT
PORTABLES
$579.45
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 1 of 6 Monday, October 6, 2025 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 9/1/2025 - To Payment Date: 9/30/2025 27 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
89958 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Kevin Sharrah Designs $1,923.35 89959 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable LEAF Capital Funding LLC $404.55 89960 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable MATTHEW'S ROOFING $24,771.00 89961 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Mendes Supply Company $265.65 89962 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $250.00 89963 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $250.00 89964 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Mooretown Rancheria Forestry Contract Services
$108,807.77
89965 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP $39.99 89966 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable NORTHGATE PETROLEUM CO $7,503.77 89967 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $614.87 89968 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable OFFICE DEPOT ACCT#36233169 $355.30 89969 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable OROVILLE FORD $31.82 89970 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Oroville Tow & Salvage $250.00 89971 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE AUTO BODY $4,911.61 89972 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE IRRIGATION DIST $2,877.60 89973 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
$850.00
89974 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE POST $262.58 89975 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Payless Building Supply $78.23 89976 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY $157.31 89977 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Psomas $220,890.55 89978 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Rackley Company $53,958.10 89979 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Redline Installations Inc $5,294.44 89980 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Robert Chiatovich and Sons Construction
$53,137.50
89981 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Spherion Staffing $4,245.26 89982 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable SUTTER BUTTES
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
$685.80
89983 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Tahoe Pure Water Co. $171.45 89984 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE $56.76 89985 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - ENG.
DEPT.
$487.78
89986 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - FIRE DEPT.
$155.58
89987 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Timios Title $100,000.00 89988 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Top Notch Commercial Cleaning Inc. $2,400.00 89989 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable TUCKER PEST CONTROL INC $95.00 89990 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Warner Enterprises Inc $641,768.94 89991 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Williams Scotsman, Inc. (Mobile Mini) $199.08 89992 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable WITTMEIER AUTO CENTER $129.04 89993 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Wood Rodgers, Inc. $2,313.43 89994 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Wood Rodgers, Inc. $5,912.18 89995 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Anderson , David $1,030.07 89996 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Brown, Maria $15.00 89997 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Dutzi, Jess $96.28 89998 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Freedom Forever Northern CA LLC $374.74 89999 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Thomas , Marissa $71.39 90000 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable ICMA 457 - MissionSquare $10,215.63 90001 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $656.29 user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 2 of 6 Monday, October 6, 2025 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 9/1/2025 - To Payment Date: 9/30/2025 28 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90002 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable TOP CONFIDENTIAL MID MGMT
ASSOCIATION
$100.00
90003 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable TOP CONFIDENTIAL MID MGMT
ASSOCIATION
$145.00
90004 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable Aflac $57.98
90005 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable Met Life $13,481.33 90006 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable OPERATING ENGINEERS $910.00 90007 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE POLICE OFFICERS
ASSOCIATION
$2,643.16
90008 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable SUN LIFE INSURANCE $10,692.86 90009 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable TOP CONFIDENTIAL MID MGMT
ASSOCIATION
$140.00
90010 09/16/2025 Open Accounts Payable SUPERIOR VISION SVC INC $893.75 90011 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable ACCESS INFORMATION
PROTECTED
$103.85
90012 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AIRGAS SAFETY, INC. $89.10 90013 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable American Dream Construction, Inc. $26,281.81 90014 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Archuleta, Derek, S $494.50 90015 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $135.74 90016 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $271.47 90017 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $102.81 90018 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $763.35 90019 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - REPEATER LINES $196.86 90020 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - COMMUNITY PARK
$29.64
90021 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - Summary $29.80 90022 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - TH/FDPD FIBER LINES
$1,056.72
90023 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Bear Electrical Systems, Inc $1,520.00 90024 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Biometrics4ALL, Inc $12.00 90025 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Brain-Friendly Dynamics $2,000.00 90026 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Bug Smart $126.00 90027 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable BUTTE CO AIR QUALITY
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
$351.13
90028 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable BUTTE CO RECORDER $317.50 90029 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable California Concrete LLC, Jeffery , Duke Paul
$2,356.59
90030 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Caltronics Business Systems/J.J. R Ent Inc
$2,004.23
90031 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Cole Huber LLP $11,822.49 90032 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Cooper, Andrew $322.50 90033 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Creative Composition Inc $559.62 90034 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable DATCO SERVICES CORPORATION $35.00 90035 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY &
FIRE PROTECTION
$3,529.32
90036 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Dokken Engineering, Inc. $75,239.74 90037 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable DURHAM PENTZ TRUCK CENTER $135.00 90038 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. $2,500.00 90039 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Fleming Construction $20,970.00 90040 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Golden State Emergency Vehicle Service, Inc.
$161.56
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 3 of 6 Monday, October 6, 2025 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 9/1/2025 - To Payment Date: 9/30/2025 29 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90041 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable GREEN RIDGE LANDSCAPING $1,127.70 90042 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable INTERSTATE OIL COMPANY $69.21 90043 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. $12,364.11 90044 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Jennifer Arbuckle $4,000.00 90045 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable JOHNNY ON THE SPOT
PORTABLES
$380.25
90046 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION $442,169.32 90047 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES $1,200.00 90048 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Kovacs, Cameron $286.50 90049 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable LIFE ASSIST INC $878.44 90050 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria
$36,690.75
90051 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Meyers Police K-9 Training, LLC $1,200.00 90052 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $250.00 90053 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable MODERN BUILDING INC. $112,958.50 90054 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Mountain G Enterprises Inc $114,581.56 90055 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable N&S North, INC $700.99 90056 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable North State Tire Co. Inc. $3,728.25 90057 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable NORTHERN RECYCLING & WASTE SERVICES, INC.
$2,340.51
90058 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable NORTHGATE PETROLEUM CO $8,222.35 90059 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable NORTHSTAR $1,560.00 90060 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $1,002.13 90061 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable OFFICE DEPOT ACCT#36233169 $598.10 90062 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable OROVILLE FORD $39.79 90063 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Oroville Tow & Salvage $500.00 90064 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE IRRIGATION DIST $31,069.45 90065 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE POST $121.81 90066 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PERKINS MOBILE AUTO GLASS $100.00 90067 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PICKERING, ROBERT $286.50 90068 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PLACER LABS INC. $13,500.00 90069 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PlaceWorks Inc $3,335.00 90070 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PLATT ELECTRIC SUPPLY $197.22 90071 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Psomas $160,944.41 90072 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Radco Trucking, Radco Trucking $680.00 90073 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Richter Construction, Inc. $20,599.80 90074 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Sigler Pest Control $50.00 90075 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Spherion Staffing $2,069.41 90076 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Steven A Ferchaud $300.00 90077 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Stratti $4,085.62 90078 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Tahoe Pure Water Co. $127.00 90079 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable The Ferguson Group $5,000.00 90080 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - ENG.
DEPT.
$170.34
90081 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - FIRE DEPT.
$26.72
90082 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable TRACE ANALYTICS, INC. $441.70 90083 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Training Alliance for Public Safety, Inc. $4,700.00 90084 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $64,366.04 90085 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable UNICO Engineering, Inc. $68,636.59 user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 4 of 6 Monday, October 6, 2025 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 9/1/2025 - To Payment Date: 9/30/2025 30 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90086 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Urban Design Associates. LTD $28,705.90 90087 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable VALLEY OAK VETERINARY CENTER
$132.49
90088 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Vannucci, Dominic $253.00 90089 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Voiance Language Services, LLC $11.73 90090 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable West Family Homes $17,587.50 90091 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Westlake Ace Hardware $60.88 90092 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable David Anderson $356.42 90093 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable DR Builds $254.40 90094 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Rhonda Berndt De Pineda $321.35 90095 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable ICMA 457 - MissionSquare $3,268.93 90096 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $656.29 90097 09/24/2025 Open Accounts Payable Luiselli, Amber $102.00 90098 09/24/2025 Open Accounts Payable Royat, Briana $102.00 90099 09/30/2025 Open Accounts Payable ICMA 457 - MissionSquare $3,289.04 90100 09/30/2025 Open Accounts Payable STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $656.29 Type Check Totals: 183 Transactions $3,782,609.60
EFT
273 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable Amazon Capital Services $1,336.49 274 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T MOBILITY $107.00 275 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $14.82 276 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $181.03 277 09/04/2025 Open Accounts Payable T MOBILE USA, INC. $2,033.99 278 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS - RETIREMENT $70,038.50 279 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
$29,368.17
280 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable ING LIFE INS & ANNUITY COMPANY $7,805.90 281 09/08/2025 Open Accounts Payable INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $83,388.56 282 09/15/2025 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS $174,020.83 283 09/16/2025 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC $3,983.16 284 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable Amazon Capital Services $758.99 285 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable AT&T MOBILITY $116.99 286 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $425.98 287 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $210.98 288 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable I.M.P.A.C. PAYMENTS IMPAC GOV
SVCS/US BANCORP
$20,887.89
289 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC $19,584.88 290 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable VERIZON WIRELESS $570.15 291 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable VERIZON WIRELESS $1,437.01 292 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS - RETIREMENT $72,611.85 293 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
$17,069.03
294 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable ING LIFE INS & ANNUITY COMPANY $8,498.54 295 09/17/2025 Open Accounts Payable INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $52,403.43 296 09/30/2025 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS - RETIREMENT $71,776.79 297 09/30/2025 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
$15,063.59
298 09/30/2025 Open Accounts Payable ING LIFE INS & ANNUITY COMPANY $8,373.87 299 09/30/2025 Open Accounts Payable INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $48,325.60 Type EFT Totals: 27 Transactions $710,394.02
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 5 of 6 Monday, October 6, 2025 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 9/1/2025 - To Payment Date: 9/30/2025 31 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
AP TCB - General Checking Totals
Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 183 $3,782,609.60 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 183 $3,782,609.60 $0.00
EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 27 $710,394.02 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 27 $710,394.02 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 210 $4,493,003.62 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 210 $4,493,003.62 $0.00
Grand Totals:
Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 183 $3,782,609.60 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 183 $3,782,609.60 $0.00
EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 27 $710,394.02 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 27 $710,394.02 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 210 $4,493,003.62 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 210 $4,493,003.62 $0.00
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 6 of 6 Monday, October 6, 2025 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 9/1/2025 - To Payment Date: 9/30/2025 32 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 2(c)
ORIGINATED BY: Susan Hartman, Community Development Director – Planning & Wastewater
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
Scott Huber, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 649
LONG-TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Waive second reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. 649 and approve reading by title only; and,
2. Adopt Town Ordinance No. 649, " An Ordinance Amending Text Regulations within Paradise Municipal Code Title 17 of the Paradise Municipal Code Relative to Temporary Storage Yards for Work in Public and Private Rights-of-Way” Background:
On September 9, 2025, the Town Council introduced the above-noted Town ordinance for purposes of eventual adoption. If adopted, the proposed ordinance intends to amend the temporary use regulations to allow off-site storage yards for contractors working in public and private rights-of-way.
Analysis:
Town staff recommends the Town Council waive the second reading of this entire ordinance; read it by title only and formally adopt Town Ordinance No. 649 [copy attached]. Once adopted, the provisions of this ordinance will be effective thirty (30) days thereafter.
Financial Impact:
A nominal cost for publication of the ordinance within the local newspaper and for codification will be borne by the Town of Paradise.
33 TOWN OF PARADISE
ORDINANCE NO. 649
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TEXT REGULATIONS WITHIN
PARADISE MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 17 [ZONING] OF THE PARADISE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATIVE TO THE TEMPORARY STORAGE YARDS FOR WORK IN PUBLIC AND
PRIVATE
RIGHTS-OF-WAY
SECTION 1. Amend the allowed temporary use land uses listed in Section 17.32.100.B [Temporary use regulations] to read:
The following temporary land uses shall be allowed subject to the regulations set forth within this chapter. Note: All temporary land uses that include food sales require a permit from the Butte County department of public health.
A. Model homes or apartment and related real estate sales activities, located within a subdivision or residential development: temporary use permit required; B. Contractor’s office, storage yard, and equipment parking and servicing on the site of an active construction project or on private property to service an active construction project in public or private rights-of-way: temporary use permit required.
1. The director may establish such additional conditions as necessary to ensure land use compatibility and to minimize potential negative impacts, which may include but is not limited to the following:
a. Hours and frequency of operation;
b. Temporary arrangements for parking and circulation;
c. Requirements for screening or enclosure;
d. Guarantees for site restoration and cleanup following temporary storage use; e. Posting of a sign at the entrance of the temporary storage yard with site supervisor contact information;
f. Restrict access to septic tank and leach field areas on the temporary storage yard property;
g. Requirements for dust control and maintenance of temporary storage yard property; and
h. Use of a private road easement to access a temporary storage yard on private property serving a construction project in public or private rights-of-way shall not be permitted unless written consent to such use is provided by all property owners having legal interest in the private road easement.
SECTION 2. CEQA COMPLIANCE. The Town Council finds and determines that the enactment of this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) (General Rule Exemption).
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its passage. Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, this ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the Town of 34 Paradise along with the names of the members of the Town Council of Paradise voting for and against same.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise, County of Butte, State of California, on this 14th day of October, 2025 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk/Elections Official
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
35 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 2(d)
ORIGINATED BY: Eric Reinbold, Police Chief
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Office of Traffic Safety Grant Acceptance
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Accept the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant award for $45,000 from the California Office of Traffic Safety.
Background:
The Paradise Police Department has applied, and been approved, for a Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS). The grant period spans from October 1, 2025, to September 30, 2026, in the amount of $45,000. These funds will provide overtime and training opportunities for Officers with minimal to no staffing impact related to normal operations, as well as to purchase equipment required for this mission.
This grant was approved through OTS due to the significant increase in vehicular traffic through the Town of Paradise since the Camp Fire. The Town of Paradise has seen a 50% increase in crashes between 2021 and 2023, including a 27.5% increase in injuries resulting from crashes in that period. To mitigate these increases, the Paradise Police Department has increased its traffic safety enforcement operations. Due to these operations, there has been an increase of citations for speed related violations by more than 80% between 2022 and 2023. In that same period, citations for stop sign violations increased by 118%. Additionally, seat belt violations have increased by 500% during the same period.
The goal of this grant is to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. Strategies which will be funded by this grant include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors (such as driving at unsafe speeds, stop sign violations, red light violations, etc.), distracted driving, seat belt enforcement, the encouragement of motorcycle safety, increasing public awareness and enforcement in areas with high numbers of pedestrian and bicycle crashes, and public educational programs.
Analysis:
By receiving the grant funds, the Paradise Police Department will be financially empowered to increase traffic enforcement and educational operations, with the goal of reducing the number of crashes and the number of individuals injured as a result. Staff recommends the Town Council accept the grant of $45,000 from OTS.
36 Financial Impact:
This is a reimbursable grant.
The funds utilized for these operations may be initially deducted from the Department’s Traffic Safety Account.
Quarterly reimbursement requests will be submitted to OTS with justification for funds spent.
OTS will process reimbursement requests and provide those funds to the Town’s Finance Department.
The acceptance of the $45,000 grant allowance is expected to have no fiscal impacts relating to its usage at the conclusion of the grant period.
37 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 1 of 21
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT
GRANT NUMBER
PT26171
1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)
2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
Paradise From:
To:
10/01/2025
09/30/2026 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Paradise Police Department
5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.
6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed:
Allocation is contingent upon availability of federal funds. $45,000.00
7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable) Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable) Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto. These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.
We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.
8. Approval Signatures
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:
TITLE:
EMAIL:
PHONE:
ADDRESS:
Cameron Kovacs
Lieutenant
[email protected]
530-872-6161
5595 Black Olive Drive
Paradise, CA 95969
ADDRESS: Eric Reinbold
Chief of Police
[email protected]
(530)872-6161 Ext 201
5595 Black Olive Drive
Paradise, CA 95969
{{_es_signer2_signature}} {{_es_signer2_date}} {{_es_signer4_signature}} {{_es_signer4_date}} (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OFFICIAL D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY ADDRESS: Aimee Beleu
Finance Director
[email protected]
(530)872-6291 Ext 121
Skyway
Paradise, CA
ADDRESS: Stephanie Dougherty
Director
[email protected]
(916) 509-3030
2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
{{_es_signer3_signature}} {{_es_signer3_date}} {{_es_signer6_signature}} {{_es_signer6_date}} (Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
Cameron Kovacs (Sep 11, 2025 18:39:18 PDT)
Cameron Kovacs Sep 11, 2025 Aimee Beleu (Sep 16, 2025 13:35:23 PDT) Aimee Beleu Sep 16, 2025 Eric R. Reinbold (Sep 16, 2025 14:16:05 PDT) Eric R. Reinbold Sep 16, 2025 Sep 30, 2025
38 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 2 of 21
E. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY 9. SAM INFORMATION NAME: Carolyn Vu SAM #:
REGISTERED
ADDRESS:
CITY:
ZIP+4:
KQ7GRKNP8QS1
5555 Skyway
Paradise
95969-4931
ADDRESS: 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758
10. PROJECTED EXPENDITURES
FUND CFDA ITEM/APPROPRIATION F.Y. CHAPTER STATUTE PROJECTED
EXPENDITURES
405e DDL-26 20.616 0521-0890-101 2025 04/25 BA/25 $7,000.00 402PT-26 20.600 0521-0890-101 2025 04/25 BA/25 $20,000.00 164AL-26 20.608 0521-0890-101 2025 04/25 BA/25 $18,000.00
AGREEMENT
TOTAL $45,000.00
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT
I CERTIFY upon my own personal knowledge that the budgeted funds for the current budget year are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
$45,000.00
PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR THIS
AGREEMENT
$ 0.00
OTS ACCOUNTING OFFICER’S SIGNATURE DATE SIGNED TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE {{_es_signer5_signature}} {{_es_signer5_date}} $45,000.00 Carolyn Vu (Sep 16, 2025 14:18:16 PDT) Sep 16, 2025 39 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 3 of 21
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A
GRANT NUMBER
PT26171
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Describe the city, county, or jurisdiction this grant will impact.
The Town of Paradise, located in Butte County, California, is a small but dynamic community with a population of approximately 10,000 residents. Since the devastating Camp Fire in 2018, the town has been undergoing extensive rebuilding, transforming into a major construction hub. This reconstruction includes not only structural and utility work but also significant improvements to roads and infrastructure, all of which have played a role in shaping the current traffic conditions in the town. As a result of these efforts, there has been a marked increase in traffic volume, road disruptions, and traffic-related challenges that require immediate attention.
Paradise serves as a crucial transportation corridor, connecting several unincorporated communities within Butte County to the nearby Cities of Chico and Oroville. Additionally, it provides the only direct route to larger metropolitan areas, including Sacramento and San Francisco, as well as access to the Sacramento International Airport. Given its role as a key transit point, Paradise experiences a significant influx of vehicular traffic. This includes not only local residents commuting to and from work, schools, and businesses but also travelers passing through on their way to regional and out-of-state destinations.
The high volume of traffic, coupled with ongoing construction activities, has placed considerable strain on the town's infrastructure. As a result, traffic-related complaints have surged, with a notable increase in concerns about speeding, stop sign violations, red light violations, and school zone infractions.
Between 2021 and 2023, the town saw a staggering 50% increase in crashes and a 27.5% increase in injuries, signaling a concerning rise in traffic safety issues.
Further compounding the problem is the marked increase in traffic violations. Citations for unsafe speeding violations increased by over 82% from 2022 to 2023, and stop sign violations jumped by an alarming 118% during the same period. Additionally, distracted driving is on the rise, with cell phone violations up by more than 500%, and seatbelt violations also increasing by 500%. These violations reflect a growing trend of unsafe driving behaviors, including excessive speed, distracted driving, and non-compliance with basic safety protocols. These behaviors not only contribute to the increasing number of crashes but also heighten the severity of injuries sustained in crashes.
The significant uptick in both traffic crashes and violations points to a critical need for targeted interventions in the Town of Paradise. As the town continues to rebuild and its roads become more heavily trafficked, ensuring the safety of drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists has become more urgent than ever.
Addressing the root causes of these traffic safety issues—such as speeding, distracted driving, and noncompliance with traffic laws—will be crucial in mitigating the rising number of crashes and preventing further injuries and fatalities.
The town's situation is compounded by its status as a construction hub, where the presence of heavy equipment, road closures, and temporary detours create added complexity for drivers. These factors contribute to an even greater risk for traffic violations and crashes, particularly in areas where workers, pedestrians, and cyclists are vulnerable.
Describe the problem(s) to be addressed, supported by current and relevant crash data. (most recent calendar year data/stats).
Problem Statement for Office of Traffic Safety Grant Application The analysis of traffic crash data from 2022 to 2024 reveals persistent and concerning traffic safety issues, particularly regarding injury crashes, alcohol-related incidents, hit-and-run crashes, nighttime driving risks, and driver error. While the number of fatal crashes has decreased, the overall number of injury crashes remains alarmingly high, signifying a critical need for targeted interventions to improve road safety and reduce the severity of crashes in the region.High Number of Injury Crashes Despite a reduction in fatal crashes, injury crashes continue to be a significant concern. In 2023, there were 39 injury crashes, resulting in 51 victims, and in 2024, there were 34 injury crashes with 47 victims.
While these numbers represent a slight decline over the previous years, the high incidence of injuries suggests that the current interventions may not be sufficiently addressing the underlying causes. Injuries sustained in traffic crashes not only place a strain on individuals and families but also contribute to broader social and economic costs. It is crucial to address the factors contributing to these injuries in order to improve the overall safety of road users.Alcohol-Involved Crashes 40 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 4 of 21
Alcohol continues to be a major factor in traffic incidents. In 2023, there were 2 alcohol-related injury crashes, resulting in 2 injured victims, and in 2024, this number increased to 5 alcohol-related injury crashes, with 7 victims. While no fatal alcohol-involved crashes were recorded during this period, the continued presence of alcohol as a contributing factor to injury crashes underscores the need for more effective prevention strategies. This includes enhanced law enforcement of driving under the influence (DUI) laws, public awareness campaigns, and alcohol education programs. Alcohol-related crashes not only increase the likelihood of injuries but also pose a significant challenge to traffic safety enforcement.Hit-andRun Incidents Hit-and-run crashes remain a serious issue, exacerbating both the severity of crashes and the difficulty of resolving these incidents. In 2023, there were 2 hit-and-run injury crashes, with 2 victims injured, and in 2024, there was 1 hit-and-run injury crash, resulting in 1 injured victim. These incidents are especially concerning because the perpetrators of hit-and-run crashes often evade law enforcement, making it harder to prevent future occurrences and hold offenders accountable. A continued focus on improving crash reporting, increasing surveillance, and enhancing public awareness about the consequences of leaving the scene of a crash is necessary to address this problem effectively.Nighttime Driving Hazards Nighttime crashes, which occur between 9:00 PM and 2:59 AM, are particularly problematic. In 2023, there were 4 injury crashes at night, resulting in 7 victims, and in 2024, the number of injury crashes during these hours increased slightly to 5 crashes, with 8 victims. Despite a small reduction from the previous year, the risks associated with nighttime driving remain significant. The combination of reduced visibility, increased driver fatigue, and sometimes impaired driving at night makes these hours more dangerous.
Therefore, focused efforts, including increased nighttime patrols, improved lighting on roads, and public education campaigns highlighting the risks of driving at night, are essential to reduce nighttime crashes.Driver Error as a Leading Factor
The primary factor in both fatal and injury crashes continues to be driver error. In 2023, 44 injury crashes were caused by driver error, and in 2024, this number dropped slightly to 32 injury crashes. While there were no fatalities directly linked to driver error during this period, it remains the leading cause of crashes, highlighting the need for more effective driver education and traffic law enforcement. Common causes of driver error include distracted driving, speeding, failure to yield, and fatigue. Addressing these behaviors through public education, stronger penalties for violations, and focused enforcement efforts is crucial in reducing crash rates and minimizing the number of injuries and fatalities caused by preventable mistakes.Animal-Related Crashes
Animal-related crashes, though less frequent, still account for a small but significant portion of injury crashes. In 2023 and 2024, there were 2 injury crashes each year caused by animals. While these incidents are less common, they can lead to severe injuries, particularly in rural areas where wildlife crashes are more frequent. Improved signage in high-risk wildlife areas, better driver education on how to respond to animals on the road, and potential wildlife fencing in key locations could help mitigate these crashes.Unknown Factors in Crash Data
Finally, there remains a small number of crashes in which the contributing factors are unknown. In 2023 and 2024, 1 injury crash each year was attributed to an unknown cause. While this is a minor issue, it points to potential gaps in crash reporting or investigation. Further efforts to improve crash data collection and analysis could help identify previously unrecognized factors contributing to traffic incidents, leading to more informed decision-making in safety interventions.Conclusion and Recommendations The data clearly indicates that while fatalities have decreased, injury crashes continue to be a significant concern, with driver error being the predominant cause. Alcohol involvement, hit-and-run incidents, nighttime crashes, and animal-related crashes further compound the traffic safety challenges. To address these issues, the following recommendations are proposed:
Enhanced DUI Prevention and Enforcement: Increase sobriety checkpoints, DUI enforcement, and public education campaigns to reduce alcohol-related crashes, particularly during high-risk periods like weekends and nighttime hours.
Improved Hit-and-Run Prevention: Strengthen efforts to combat hit-and-run incidents through enhanced crash reporting systems, surveillance technologies, and public awareness about the consequences of fleeing the scene.
Targeted Nighttime Driving Campaigns: Focus on reducing nighttime crashes with additional law enforcement presence, improved road lighting, and public education on the dangers of nighttime driving. 41
9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 5 of 21
Driver Education and Enforcement: Expand educational programs aimed at reducing driver error, particularly addressing distracted driving, speeding, and fatigue. Strengthen penalties for violations contributing to crashes.
Wildlife Crash Mitigation: Implement wildlife awareness programs, improved signage, and explore the feasibility of wildlife barriers in areas with high animal-related crash rates. Crash Data Improvement: Enhance crash investigation protocols and data collection methods to better understand the causes of unknown crashes and refine safety measures based on the data.
By focusing on these targeted interventions, we can reduce the number of injury crashes and fatalities, ultimately improving road safety for all users in the region. This grant will provide crucial funding to support these efforts and make meaningful progress toward reducing traffic-related harm.
Define the target population the grant intends to serve and how they are affected by the problem(s).
Target Population and How They Are Affected by the Problem The target population for this grant encompasses all road users in the region, with a particular focus on those most vulnerable to the traffic safety issues highlighted in the crash data. These individuals include drivers, passengers, pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists—groups that are directly impacted by the high number of crashes, injuries, and fatalities on the roads. The primary issues identified in the data—driver error, alcohol-involved crashes, hit-and-run incidents, nighttime driving hazards, and animal-related crashes—disproportionately affect specific groups, and understanding how these populations are impacted is crucial to addressing the problem effectively.
First and foremost, drivers and passengers make up the largest group affected by traffic crashes. The crash data clearly shows that driver error is the leading cause of both fatal and injury crashes. In 2023, driver error was responsible for a significant number of injury crashes, resulting in numerous victims.
Passengers, often at the mercy of the driver’s behavior, are particularly vulnerable, especially in crashes involving speeding, distracted driving, or impaired driving. While many crashes involve single drivers, the data highlights the risk posed to both drivers and their passengers, who may be injured or killed as a result of preventable mistakes.
Pedestrians and cyclists are also part of the broader road user population that faces unique risks, although the data provided doesn’t break down pedestrian or cyclist-specific crashes. Still, these groups are disproportionately vulnerable when crashes occur, particularly when drivers are distracted, impaired, or driving recklessly. Pedestrians and cyclists have little to no protection in the event of a crash, which increases their likelihood of severe injury or death. This issue is compounded in areas with high traffic volumes or inadequate pedestrian infrastructure, which elevates the risk for these vulnerable road users.
Another high-risk group is nighttime drivers, who face particular challenges that contribute to a higher rate of crashes. The crash data reveals that nighttime driving—particularly between the hours of 9:00 PM and 2:59 AM—presents a significant risk. Drivers on the road during these late hours often include young, inexperienced drivers and individuals who are impaired by alcohol or drugs. The combination of reduced visibility, fatigue, and impaired judgment significantly increases the risk of crashes. These drivers are often more prone to risky behavior, including speeding or driving under the influence, which further exacerbates the dangers. The data suggests that nighttime driving is a persistent problem that impacts both drivers and passengers, as well as other road users who may be caught in the path of these impaired or distracted individuals.
Closely linked to this issue is the problem of impaired driving, which remains a significant factor in injury crashes. Alcohol-involved crashes have steadily contributed to injuries and fatalities in the region, with a noticeable uptick in alcohol-related incidents between 2023 and 2024. The target population in this case includes not only those who choose to drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs but also the innocent victims—drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and cyclists—who are at risk due to the reckless behavior of impaired drivers. Alcohol-related crashes often result in severe injuries or fatalities, creating a lasting impact on both the offenders and the victims involved in the crash.
The problem of hit-and-run crashes is another key concern, affecting both the victims of the crash and the broader community. The data shows a continued presence of hit-and-run incidents, often involving injured victims. In these cases, the individuals involved in the crash may be left without medical assistance or the ability to report the incident effectively, which delays recovery and justice. Those affected by hit-and-run crashes include the victims themselves, their families, and even the broader community, which must deal with the consequences of unresolved or unsolved crimes. These incidents are particularly troubling because 42 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 6 of 21
they not only lead to physical harm but also create emotional trauma and a sense of insecurity among the public.
Finally, the data highlights the risks faced by residents in rural and suburban areas, where animalrelated crashes are more frequent. Although animal-related crashes are less common overall, they still contribute to injury incidents, especially in rural settings where wildlife is more likely to cross roads. In these areas, drivers may face limited visibility, poorly lit roads, and longer response times in the event of a crash.
The increased risk for individuals living or traveling in rural and suburban areas underscores the need for targeted safety measures, including improved signage and animal barriers, to reduce the occurrence of these types of crashes.
In summary, the target population for this grant includes a wide range of road users, from drivers and passengers to pedestrians, cyclists, and individuals in rural communities. The data indicates that these groups are disproportionately affected by the high rates of injury and fatality caused by driver error, impaired driving, hit-and-run incidents, and nighttime crashes. By addressing the underlying causes of these problems, the grant will reduce the risks faced by these populations, ultimately improving road safety for everyone.
2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:
1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.
2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.
3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.
4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.
5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.
6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.
7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.
8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.
9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.
10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.
11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.
12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.
13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.
14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.
15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.
16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.
17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.
18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.
B. Objectives: Target Number
1. Issue a news release announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31st. The kick-off news releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 7 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
1 2. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:
National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: National Speed Prevention Campaigns, NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
12 3. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. 12 4. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 1 5. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 2 43
9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 7 of 21
6. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training (classroom and field training must be completed).
1 7. Send law enforcement personnel to SFST Instructor training. 1
8. Send law enforcement personnel to DRE Instructor training. 1
9. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 18
10. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
12 11. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
10 12. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 4 13. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
2 14. Send law enforcement personnel to RADAR/LIDAR training. 3
3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year) The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
Conduct all training needed to implement the program, in the first quarter. Purchase all grant related supplies and materials to implement the program, in the first quarter. Items with a unit cost of $5,000 more (including tax and shipping) must comply with Buy America. In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst of the worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly. Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.
Media Requirements
Issue a news release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31 and after the grant is signed and executed, but no sooner than October 1, the start of the grant year. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO. If you are unable to meet the December 31 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate reasons to your OTS grant coordinator and OTS PIO.
B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year) Media Requirements
The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
Send all PowerPoint presentations, online presentations and trainings for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Certified training courses are EXEMPT from the approval process.
The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the OTS grant coordinator. Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, news releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.
However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a news release, educational material, or link to social media post.
44 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 8 of 21
If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator.
News releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are EXEMPT from the OTS PIO approval process.
The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are EXEMPT from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator with the embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email. Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval.
Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication. Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:
Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult the OTS PIO and copy your OTS grant coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.
Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.
If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO and coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of event within 7 days following significant grantrelated event or program. Media and program highlights are to be reflected in QPRs. Any news releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received OTS PIO approval in a prior grant year needs to be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.
For additional guidance, refer to the OTS Grants Materials Approval Process Guidelines and OTS Grants Media Approval Process FAQs on the OTS website. Contact the OTS PIO or your OTS grant coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.
C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)
1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives. Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
45 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 9 of 21
Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.
4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.
46 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 10 of 21
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B
GRANT NUMBER
PT26171
FUND NUMBER CATALOG
NUMBER (CFDA)
FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
405e DDL-26 20.616 Distracted Driving Laws $7,000.00
164AL-26 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$18,000.00
402PT-26 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$20,000.00
COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER
UNIT COST OR
RATE
UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI Saturation Patrols 164AL-26 $1,000.00 18 $18,000.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-26 $700.00 12 $8,400.00
Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-26 $650.00 4 $2,600.00 Traffic Safety Educational Presentations 402PT-26 $500.00 2 $1,000.00 Distracted Driving Enforcement 405e DDL26$700.00 10 $7,000.00 Category Sub-Total $37,000.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-26 $4,878.00 1 $4,878.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $4,878.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Lidar Device 402PT-26 $1,561.00 2 $3,122.00
Category Sub-Total $3,122.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $45,000.00
47 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 11 of 21
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1
GRANT NUMBER
PT26171
BUDGET NARRATIVE
PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.
Traffic Safety Educational Presentations - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety educational presentations conducted by appropriate department personnel.
Distracted Driving Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.
TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include the OTS Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-
EQUIPMENT
-
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
Lidar Device - Light detection and ranging device used to measure the speed of motor vehicles. This device will be used for speed enforcement. Costs may include lidar devices, batteries, tax, and shipping.
INDIRECT COSTS
-
STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.
Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.
48 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 12 of 21
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A
GRANT NUMBER
PT26171
Appendix A to Part 1300—Certifications and Assurances for Highway Safety Grants (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 or Section 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Section 25024, Public Law 117- 58)
The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.
Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The State will comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including but not limited to:
23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended; Sec. 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Sec. 25024, Public Law 117-58; 23 CFR part 1300—Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs; 2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;
2 CFR part 1201—Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency [and its subrecipients] will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964); 28 CFR 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);
The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);
Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27; The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage, and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the
Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federallyfunded or not); Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38
49 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 13 of 21
The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the “Acts” and “Regulations,” respectively.
GENERAL ASSURANCES
In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that:
“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including NHTSA.”
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination requirements (the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these nondiscrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted.
SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assurances with respect to its Federally assisted Highway Safety Grant Program:
1. The Recipient agrees that each “activity,” “facility,” or “program,” as defined in 49 CFR part 21 will be (with regard to an “activity”) facilitated, or will be (with regard to a “facility”) operated, or will be (with regard to a “program”) conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.
2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Highway Safety Grant Programs and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source:
“The [name of Recipient], in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.”
3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix A and E of this Assurance (also referred to as DOT order 1050.2A) [1]in every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.
4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix B of DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.
5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.
6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.
7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in appendix C and appendix D of this DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.
8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the 50 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 14 of 21
form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.
9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub- grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.
10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.
By signing this ASSURANCE, the State highway safety agency also agrees to comply (and require any subrecipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by NHTSA. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review upon request to NHTSA, or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance.
The State highway safety agency gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Highway Safety Grant Program. This ASSURANCE is binding on the State highway safety agency, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the Highway Safety Grant Program. The person(s) signing below is/are authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient.
THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:
1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;
4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;
5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will—
1. Abide by the terms of the statement;
2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted—
1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;
2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or 51 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 15 of 21
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.
POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions;
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES) 52 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 16 of 21
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.
4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.
7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart
9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https://www.sam.gov/).
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS—PRIMARY TIER
COVERED TRANSACTIONS
1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and 53 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 17 of 21
its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.
2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.
6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.
7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart
9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https://www.sam.gov/).
8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of 54 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 18 of 21
records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION—LOWER TIER
COVERED TRANSACTIONS
1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.
2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.
CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:
1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts. b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.
2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
55 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 19 of 21
No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a grant or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of any related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:
1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.
2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient.
If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.
3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.
PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.
POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website ( www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.
POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company-owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or reevaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving. 56 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 20 of 21
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADDING OR UPDATING GEMS USERS
1. Each agency is allowed a total of FIVE (5) GEMS Users.
2. GEMS Users listed on this form will be authorized to login to GEMS to complete and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs) and reimbursement claims.
3. Complete the form if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s).
4. The Grant Director must sign this form and return it with the Grant Agreement.
CURRENT GEMS USER(S)
1. Andrew Cooper
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: 530-872-6241
Email: [email protected]
2. Cameron Kovacs
Title: Lieutenant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: 530-872-6161
Email: [email protected]
3. Eric Reinbold
Title: Chief of Police Media Contact: No
Phone: (530)872-6161 Ext 201
Email: [email protected]
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
OTS-55 Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access Exhibit C
GRANT NUMBER
PT26171
GRANT DETAILS
Grant Number: PT26171
Agency Name: Paradise Police Department
Grant Title: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Agreement Total: $45,000.00
Authorizing Official: Eric Reinbold
Fiscal Official: Aimee Beleu
Grant Director: Cameron Kovacs
57 9/11/2025 3:08:26 PM Page 21 of 21
Complete the below information if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s) GEMS User 1
Add/Change {{[]c11_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[] c12_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c1_es_:signer1}} No{{[]c2_es_:signer1}} {{UserName1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle1_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail1_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone1_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 2
Add/Change {{[]c13_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c14_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c3_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c4_es_:signer1}} {{UserName2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle2_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail2_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone2_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 3
Add/Change {{[]c15_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c16_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c5_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c6_es_:signer1}} {{UserName3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle3_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail3_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone3_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 4
Add/Change {{[]c17_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c18_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c8_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c7_es_:signer1}} {{UserName4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle4_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail4_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone4_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
GEMS User 5
Add/Change {{[]c19_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c20_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[] c9_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c10_es_:signer1}} {{UserName5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserTitle5_es_:signer1 }}
Name Job Title
{{UserEmail5_es_:signer1 }} {{UserPhone5_es_:signer1 }} Email address Phone number
Form completed by: {{Sig_es_:signer1:signature}} Date: {{Dte1_es_:signer1:date}} As a signatory I hereby authorize the listed individual(s) to represent and have GEMS user access. {{Sig_es_:signer2:signature}} {{Name1_es_:signer2:fullname }} Signature Name
{{Dte2_es_:signer2:date}} Grant Director
Date Title
Andrew Cooper (Sep 11, 2025 16:08:57 PDT)
[email protected] 5305886160 Sep 11, 2025 Cameron Kovacs (Sep 11, 2025 18:39:18 PDT) Cameron Kovacs Cameron Kovacs Sep 11, 2025
58 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 2(e)
ORIGINATED BY: Jessica Erdahl, Supervising Project Manager REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Pentz Road Widening Project CEQA Determination
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes, Tier 1, Evacuation Routes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Concur with staff recommendation to file a CEQA Notice of Exemption for the Pentz Road Widening Project.
Background:
The Town of Paradise Long-Term Community Recovery Plan as well as the 2022 Transportation Management Plan identified the Pentz Road Widening Project as a Tier 1 safety project for improving evacuation routes. The existing roadway will be widened to the east to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road by installing a 12-foot wide two-way left turn lane the entire length of Pentz Road from Skyway to the Pearson intersection.
The Town has secured $199M in Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funding to assist with delivering infrastructure projects that address identified unmet 2018 disaster recovery needs and increase the resilience of cities and counties. The Pentz Road Widening Project has been awarded $26M in CDBG-DR funds. This proposed project will provide emergency ingress/egress during future evacuation events.
Improvements are being proposed along the east side of Pentz Road where an existing roadside drainage ditch collects and conveys storm drain water flow. The Project proposes to improve the storm drain system to tie into the storm drain system being constructed as part of the Go Paradise:
Pentz Student Pathway Project. The storm drain system improvements are sized to accommodate flows from the Project area. Additionally, storm drain outfalls are proposed as part of this Project, which will collect water from the storm drain system improvements and outfall adjacent to Dry Creek at numerous locations along the alignment. The Town of Paradise contracted with Dokken Engineering to perform civil engineering design services on the Pentz Road Widening Project.
Analysis:
The current phase for this project is environmental review both under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is serving as the lead agency in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment with a Finding of No Significant Impact per 24 CFR
58.40(g)(1) for NEPA compliance.
59 The CEQA process requires the lead local agency to examine the project proposal and evaluate potential impacts. Staff have evaluated the subject project thoroughly and found that the project is exempt as set forth by Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines for a project consistent with the use and density established for a property under an existing general plan or zoning ordinance for which there is already a certified EIR. The Pentz Road Widening Project is a component within the Town of Paradise General Plan, as amended through January 2010, and was evaluated within the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified in 1994, and included as a needed improvement within the General Plan 2022-2030 Housing and Safety Elements Update Initial Study with Negative Declaration approved by the Town in June 2022.
Pentz Road was described as an arterial road requiring improvements due to the anticipated increases of traffic volumes within the General Plan EIR, and the IS/ND described this project as a roadway widening for emergency response along segments of Pentz Road. The Town’s proposed Pentz Road Widening is within the same footprint as previously considered in the EIR and IS/ND; however, due to the length of time since the previous environmental approval of the EIR and the IS/ND, additional environmental analysis was required.
The Town of Paradise General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND served as a basis for the Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist to determine if impacts related to the Pentz Road Widening Project would occur that were not adequately covered in the previously certified environmental documents. The analysis conducted for the Pentz Road Widening Project determined that all impacts were previously adequately addressed in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND. Additional avoidance and minimization measures were recommended for project-specific impacts; however, no new mitigation measures were required.
To complete CEQA under Section 15183, a Notice of Exemption is filed on the General Plan EIR to complete CEQA. Staff is requesting the Council to concur and approve for filing the Notice of Exemption with the Butte County Recorder’s Office and Office of Planning and Research. If approved, the environmental phase will be complete in October 2025 and design and right-of way efforts may continue towards construction in 2027.
The Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist and a draft Notice of Exemption are attached to this staff report.
Financial Impact:
There is a recording fee of $50 per project with the Butte County Recorder’s Office to file the Notice of Exemption.
Attachments:
A. Project Map
B. Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
C. CEQA Notice of Exemption
60 0 2.5 5 7.5 10
Miles
I
Source: ESRI World Street Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl Project Location
Town of Paradise Limits
PROJECT LOCATION
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Document Path: V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\PentzEast_F1_Vicinity.mxd 61 S
kyw
ay
Pentz
Rd
Skyway
P
e
ntz
R
d
Figure 2
Project Location
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Source: ESRI Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\PentzEast_F2_Location.mxd I 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
Project Location
Town of Paradise Limits
62 Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
Pentz Road Widening Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Prepared for:
Town of Paradise
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
Prepared by:
Dokken Engineering
110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
October 2025
63 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. BACKGROUND................................................................................................................. 1
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION................................................................................................. 3
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION...................................................................................................... 3
2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................... 3
3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/ IMPACT ANALYSIS....................................................14
3.1. AESTHETICS.................................................................................................................14
3.2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES...............................................................16
3.3. AIR QUALITY.................................................................................................................17
3.4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ..........................................................................................20
3.5. CULTURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................25
3.6. ENERGY ........................................................................................................................27
3.7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS..................................................................................................28
3.8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.................................................................................31
3.9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS..................................................................32
3.10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ........................................................................32
3.11. LAND USE AND PLANNING........................................................................................38
3.12. MINERAL RESOURCES ..............................................................................................39
3.13. NOISE..........................................................................................................................40
3.14. POPULATION AND HOUSING ....................................................................................43
3.15. PUBLIC SERVICES......................................................................................................44
3.16. RECREATION..............................................................................................................46
3.17. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ...................................................................47
3.18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES..............................................................................49
3.19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS..........................................................................51
3.20. WILDFIRE ....................................................................................................................53
3.21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.............................................................55
4. REFERENCES..................................................................................................................57
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A. ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL
ATTACHMENT B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SPECIES LISTS AND WETLANDS MAPPER ATTACHMENT C. GEOTRACKER AND ENVIROSTOR RESULTS
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1. PROJECT VICINITY................................................................................................ 4 FIGURE 2. PROJECT LOCATION............................................................................................. 5 FIGURE 3. PROJECT FEATURES............................................................................................ 6 64 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
1 1. BACKGROUND
The Town of Paradise (Town) proposes to widen Pentz Road from 500 feet south of Pearson Road to Skyway (3.8 miles) in the Town of Paradise, Butte County, California. The existing roadway will be widened to the east to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road by installing a 12-foot wide two-way left turn lane the entire length of Pentz Road from Skyway to the Pearson intersection. Improvements are being proposed along the east side of Pentz Road where an existing roadside drainage ditch collects and conveys storm drain water flow. The Project proposes to improve the storm drain system to tie into the storm drain system being constructed as part of the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project. Additionally, storm drain outfalls are proposed as part of this Project, which will collect water from the storm drain system improvements and outfall adjacent to Dry Creek at numerous locations along the alignment.
The Pentz Road Widening Project (Project) is a component evaluated and included as a needed improvement within the Town of Paradise 2022-2030 Housing and Safety Elements Initial Study with Negative Declaration, approved by the Town in June 2022. The 2022-2030 Housing and Safety Element is an update to the General Plan, which was originally adopted by the Town Council in 1994 and amended through 2010. The General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by the Town of Paradise in 1994. This project was described in the 2022-2030 Housing and Safety Elements Update as a roadway widening for emergency response along segments of Pentz Road. The Town’s proposed Pentz Road Widening is within the same footprint as previously considered; however, due to the length of time since the previous environmental approval of the General Plan EIR in 1994, and 2022-2030 Housing and Safety Elements in 2022, additional environmental analysis is required.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15183
This Modified Initial Study identifies and analyzes the current potential environmental impacts of the Pentz Road Widening Project compared to what was evaluated within the Town of Paradise General Plan Environmental Impact Report and the Housing and Safety Elements Update Initial Study with Negative Declaration. The information and analysis presented in this document is organized in accordance with the order of the CEQA checklist in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines.
Pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, where a project is consistent with the use and density established for a property under an existing general plan or zoning ordinance for which there is already a certified EIR, additional environmental review is not required “except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” If such requirements are met, the examination of environmental effects is limited to those which the agency determines, in an Initial Study or other analysis:
1. are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located;
2. were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan or community plan with which the project is consistent;
3. are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action; or,
4. are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.
65 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
2 As set forth by Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Town of Paradise General Plan Environmental Impact Report and Housing and Safety Elements Update Initial Study with Negative Declaration serves as a basis for the Modified Initial Study to determine if impacts related to the Pentz Road Widening Project would occur that are not adequately covered in the previously certified environmental documents.
This Modified Initial Study indicates whether the Pentz Road Widening Project would result in any of the following significant impacts: (1) is peculiar to the project or the project site; (2) was not identified as a significant effect in the General Plan EIR; (3) are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action; or (4) are previously identified significant effects, which as a result of substantial new information that was not known at the time that the General Plan EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR.
Regarding “peculiar” impacts, CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(f) states the following:
An effect of a project on the environment shall not be considered peculiar to the project or the parcel for the purposes of this section if uniformly applied development policies or standards have been previously adopted by the city or county with a finding that the development policies or standards will substantially mitigate that environmental effect when applied to future projects, unless substantial new information shows that the policies or standards will not substantially mitigate the environmental effect. The finding shall be based on substantial evidence which need not include an EIR.
66 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
3 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION
The Project is located Pentz Road from 500 feet south of Pearson Road to Skyway (3.8 miles) in the Town of Paradise, Butte County, California. (Figure 1. Project Vicinity and Figure 2. Project Location). The Project is located within the Paradise East 7.5-Minute United States Geological Survey quadrangles (20220118).
2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Town of Paradise proposes to widen Pentz Road from 500 feet south of Pearson Road to Skyway (3.8 miles) in the Town of Paradise, Butte County, California. The existing roadway will be widened to the east to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road by installing a 12-foot wide two-way left turn lane the entire length of Pentz Road from Skyway to the Pearson intersection (Figure 3. Project Features).
Improvements are being proposed along the east side of Pentz Road where an existing roadside drainage ditch collects and conveys storm drain water flow. Additionally, numerous driveways with small cross gutters exist along this side of the road. The Project proposes to improve the storm drain system to tie into the storm drain system being constructed as part of the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project. The storm drain system improvements are sized to accommodate flows from the Project area. Additionally, storm drain outfalls are proposed as part of this Project, which will collect water from the storm drain system improvements and outfall adjacent to Dry Creek at numerous locations along the alignment. Construction of the storm drain outfalls are anticipated to occur between April and October, outside of the typical rainy season in Paradise.
The numerous driveways along Pentz Road will also require reconstruction and relocation of fences, mailboxes, and gates may also be required to accommodate the proposed widened roadway.
The construction of the widened roadway would require some land disturbance including vegetation and tree removal. All ground disturbing activities will take place within the proposed construction areas depicted in the plans. No extended road closures are anticipated to occur, and access to each residence will be maintained. Utility relocations, partial permanent acquisitions, and drainage easements along with Temporary Construction Easements (TCEs) for construction of walls and ditches, as well as Permits to Enter and Construct (PTECs) for driveway conforms will be required. PG&E is currently working to complete an undergrounding project for existing utility poles within the project area, which is anticipated to be completed prior to construction of the widening.
The Town is acting as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 67 0 2.5 5 7.5 10
Miles
I
Source: ESRI World Street Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl Project Location
Town of Paradise Limits
PROJECT LOCATION
Figure 1
Project Vicinity
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Document Path: V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\PentzEast_F1_Vicinity.mxd 68 S
kyw
ay
Pentz
Rd
Skyway
P
e
ntz
R
d
Figure 2
Project Location
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Source: ESRI Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\PentzEast_F2_Location.mxd I 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
Project Location
Town of Paradise Limits
69 Pentz Rd
Skyway
Jordan Hill Rd
Kibler Rd
D
e
an R
d
M
errill R
d
Andover Dr
New Skwy
Ste
arns R
d
Park Dr
Indian Dr
Stark Ln
Edgewood Ln
Bille
R
d
Shay Ln
Dra
y
er Dr
Adrian Dr
Hilbe Dr
Fickett Ln
Cherry Ln Ishi Dr
Feather River Pl
Sesame St
Chaney Ln
De Mille Rd
R
o
Ann W
a
y
L
ost Rid
g
e
W
a
y
Xeno Pl
C
onifer Dr
Sunr si e Ln
Sawmill Rd
Glover Ln
Belleview Dr
Drendel Cir
H
e
ynen R
d
Los A
m
gi os Ln
Styles
Ln
Shaw Cir
S
alid
a
Way
Dunmovin Ln
Calvin Dr
Blackberry Ln
Lilliput
Ln
Canyon View Dr
Blair Ln
M
oll R
d
Mountain View Dr
Riv
ervie
w
Dr
T
mi b
er Ln
Arro
whe
a
d
Dr
Fl ci ker Ln
Arany
Ct
Eden
Roc
Dr
H
one
ysuck el Ln
Johnson Dr
Bend Ln
C
onnell Ln
Whita
ker Rd
Apple
View
Way
B
a
m
bi Ln
Elyse
e
Dr
Big
Pin
e
Ln
R
o
ck H
ouse
Ln
S
p
arks Dr
Tara
Ln
Chris Ct
Allison Ct
Hilltop Dr
Bille
Rd
FIGURE 3
Project Features
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Source: ESRI Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3_Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000
Feet
1 inch = 1,666.67 feet
Project Area
Parcel Lines
Pavement Widening
Driveway Reconstructions
Existing Stormwater Drainage Systems
New Stormwater Drainage Systems
New Outfalls Pentz Rd
Clark Rd
Kibler Rd
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
70 Pentz Rd
Pearson Rd
Hilbe Dr
Stearns Rd
Chaney Ln
Lillian Av
e
D
e
erw
o
od Ln
Siler Wa
y
Rockford Ln
Crandall W
a
y
F
e
ather Riv
er Pl
S
alid
a
W
a
y
York Towne
Mnr
Matchline - See Page 3
FIGURE 3
Project Features
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Source: ESRI Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3_Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0 150 300 450 600
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
Project Area
Parcel Lines
Pavement Widening
Driveway Reconstructions
Existing Stormwater Drainage Systems
New Stormwater Drainage Systems
New Outfalls Pentz Rd
Clark Rd
Kibler Rd
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
71 P
e
n
t
z
R
d
F
i
c
k
e
t
t
L
n
C
h
a
n
e
y
L
n
Lowry Ln
Riverview Dr
Canyon View Dr
V ni eyard Dr
Bever Ln
Del R oi Way
Peach Ln
Garden Dr
Paynes Way
Quiet Ln
C
a
n
y
o
n
V
i
e
w
D
r
Matchline - See Page 2
Matchline - See Page 4
FIGURE3
ProjectFeatures
Page3of8
PentzRoadWideningEastProject
TownofParadise,ButteCounty,California
Source:ESRIMapsOnline;DokkenEngineering7/22/2025;CreatedBy:zachl V:\3122
_
Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3
_
Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0
150300450600F
eet
1inch=200feet
ProjectArea
ParcelLines
PavementWidening
DrivewayReconstructions
ExistingStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewOutfalls
P
e
n
t
z
R
d
Cla
rk
Rd
K
i
b
l
e
r
R
d
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New
Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
72 Pentz Rd
H
e
ynen R
d
Style
s
L
n
Lilliput Ln
Paige Ln
Forest
Glen
Rd
E
d
en R
o
c
Dr
Du
barry
Ln
Gree
n
way
L
n
Cle
ar Bro
o
k
L
n
C
onifer Dr
N
orw
o
o
d
Dr Morning Ln
Fruitland
Ln
Qu ei t Ln
H
arold
L
n
Lakeview Dr
Flicker L
n
Matchline - See Page 3
FIGURE 3
Project Features
Pentz Road Widening East Project
Town of Paradise, Butte County, California
Source: ESRI Maps Online; Dokken Engineering 7/22/2025; Created By: zachl V:\3122_Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3_Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0 150 300 450 600
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet
Project Area
Parcel Lines
Pavement Widening
Driveway Reconstructions
Existing Stormwater Drainage Systems
New Stormwater Drainage Systems
New Outfalls Pentz Rd
Clark Rd
Kibler Rd
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
73 P
entzRd
D
o
l
o
r
e
s
D
r
Wags at ff Rd
Bil el Rd
P
e
b
b
l
e
L
n
Ely Ln
K ni gs Row
Meadowbrook Ln
Tara Ln
Grays ot ne Ct
Stark Ln
B
e
l
l
e
v
i
e
w
D
r
Whitaker Rd
Creekside Dr
Si vl er ht orne Ln
Bille Rd
Matchline - See Page 6
FIGURE3
ProjectFeatures
Page5of8
PentzRoadWideningEastProject
TownofParadise,ButteCounty,California
Source:ESRIMapsOnline;DokkenEngineering7/22/2025;CreatedBy:zachl V:\3122
_
Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3
_
Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0
150300450600F
eet
1inch=200feet
ProjectArea
ParcelLines
PavementWidening
DrivewayReconstructions
ExistingStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewOutfalls
P
e
n
t
z
R
d
Cla
rk
Rd
K
i
b
l
e
r
R
d
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New
Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
74 P
e
n
t
z
R
d
Merrill Rd
BelleviewDr
T mi ber Ln
Dean Rd
Paradisewood Dr
Pame al Dr
F
a
r
b
e
r
L
n
R
e
x
d
a
l
e
L
n
Rock House Ln
Cypress Ln
Robin Pl
T mi ber Wa kl Way
Matchline - See Page 5
Matchline - See Page 7
FIGURE3
ProjectFeatures
Page6of8
PentzRoadWideningEastProject
TownofParadise,ButteCounty,California
Source:ESRIMapsOnline;DokkenEngineering7/22/2025;CreatedBy:zachl V:\3122
_
Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3
_
Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0
150300450600F
eet
1inch=200feet
ProjectArea
ParcelLines
PavementWidening
DrivewayReconstructions
ExistingStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewOutfalls
P
e
n
t
z
R
d
Cla
rk
Rd
K
i
b
l
e
r
R
d
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New
Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
75 P
e
n
t
z
R
d
G ni ny Ln
Arany Ct
Dean Rd
Drayer Dr
Sunr si e Ln
Hol yl brook
Aspen Ln
Eag el t Way
Kingdom Ct
Mulberry Ln
Apple View Way
Sweetbriar Ln
M di d el Tree Ln
Piney Ridge Dr
B
a
r
n
a
b
y
C
t
Matchline - See Page 8
Matchline - See Page 6
FIGURE3
ProjectFeatures
Page7of8
PentzRoadWideningEastProject
TownofParadise,ButteCounty,California
Source:ESRIMapsOnline;DokkenEngineering7/22/2025;CreatedBy:zachl V:\3122
_
Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3
_
Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0
150300450600F
eet
1inch=200feet
ProjectArea
ParcelLines
PavementWidening
DrivewayReconstructions
ExistingStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewOutfalls
P
e
n
t
z
R
d
Cla
rk
Rd
K
i
b
l
e
r
R
d
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New
Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
76 P
e
n
t
z
R
d
New
Skwy
Gate Ln
Ishi D
S
r
kyway
Skyway
St
Elysee Dr
Conners Ct
Sparks Dr
Honeysuckle Ln
Stardust Ln
Piney Ridge Dr
Indian Dr
Revere Ct
Victoria Way
Miwok Ct
Grand Ct
Candlewood
Ct
Skyway
Matchline - See Page 7
FIGURE3
ProjectFeatures
Page8of8
PentzRoadWideningEastProject
TownofParadise,ButteCounty,California
Source:ESRIMapsOnline;DokkenEngineering7/22/2025;CreatedBy:zachl V:\3122
_
Paradise Rd Rehab\PentzEast\F3
_
Project Features Data Drive-20250522.mxd I 0
150300450600F
eet
1inch=200feet
ProjectArea
ParcelLines
PavementWidening
DrivewayReconstructions
ExistingStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewStormwaterDrainageSystems
NewOutfalls
P
e
n
t
z
R
d
Cla
rk
Rd
K
i
b
l
e
r
R
d
Dean Rd
Pearson Rd
New
Skwy
Stearns Rd
S at rk Ln
77 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
14 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST/ IMPACT ANALYSIS
The following modified checklist is based on the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The modified checklist form is used to determine whether the Pentz Road Widening Project is sufficiently analyzed in the Town of Paradise General Plan Environmental Impact Report and Housing and Safety Elements Update Initial Study with Negative Declaration to support the General Plan. A discussion follows each environmental issue identified in the checklist.
3.1. AESTHETICS
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista? X
B) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
State scenic highway?
X
C) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade
the existing visual character or quality of
public views of the site and its surroundings?
(Public views are those that are experienced
from publicly accessible vantage point). If the
project is in an urbanized area, would the
project conflict with applicable zoning and
other regulations governing scenic quality?
X
D) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
X
Questions A through D
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the entirety of Pentz Road within town is identified as a scenic corridor. Projects would be required to comply with the General Plan policies related to visual resources to maintain the visual quality of public views of the town’s scenic surroundings. Further, projects in Paradise would be required to be designed and constructed in accordance with Town regulations.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would widen Pentz Road that would be visible to nearby residents, businesses, and visitors. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies, including Policies OCEO-1 and OCEO-2, would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies by enhancing the corridor and providing and improving the evacuation route along Pentz Road, which would ensure that impacts to aesthetics would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND. 78 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
15 Impacts to aesthetics/visual resources resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 79 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
16 3.2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES
Questions A through E
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, no potentially important farmland has been mapped in Paradise, no Williamson Act Contracts are within the Town according to the California Department of Conservation, and timberland/forestland would not be affected. Projects identified would not conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural use and would not result in the conversion of Farmland or forest land to non-agricultural or non-forest use.
.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would not impact agriculture and forest resources, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to agriculture and forest resources resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
X
B) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,
or a Williamson Act contract? X
C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)),
timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code section 51104(g))?
X
D) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
X
E) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
X
80 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
17 3.3. AIR QUALITY
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan? X
B) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
X
C) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
X
D) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
X
Questions A through D
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, implementation of General Plan could result in an increase in criteria pollutants during both construction and operational activities and could also contribute to the existing nonattainment status of the Northern Sacramento Valley Planning Area (NSVPA) for ozone. Construction activities such as excavation and grading operations, construction vehicle traffic, and wind blowing over exposed earth could generate exhaust emissions and fugitive particulate matter emissions that would affect local air quality. However, any future construction in the Town would follow the regulations set forth by the Butte County Air Quality Management District and the Town of Paradise.
During construction of the Pentz Road Widening, various types of equipment and vehicles would temporarily operate on the site. Construction exhaust emissions would be generated from construction equipment, vegetation clearing and earth movement activities, construction worker commutes, and construction material hauling for the entire construction period. These activities would involve the use of diesel- and gasoline-powered equipment that would generate emissions of criteria pollutants. Construction activities also represent sources of fugitive dust, which includes particulate matter (PM) emissions. As construction of the Pentz Road Widening would generate air pollutant emissions intermittently within the site and vicinity, until all construction has been completed, construction is a potential concern because the site is in a state non-attainment area for ozone. The Pentz Road Widening’s construction is anticipated to take 18 months. The Project’s construction emissions were estimated using Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 9.0.0, which is the accepted model for all CEQA roadway projects (see Attachment A).
Construction activities from the Project would not exceed the Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD) emission thresholds, which is the agency responsible for 81 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
18 monitoring and regulating air pollutant emissions from stationary, area, and indirect sources within the Northern Sacramento Valley Air Basin (NSVAB). Butte County Air Quality Management has set thresholds for emissions during construction at 137 lbs/day or 4.5 tons/year of Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) or Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx), or 80 lbs/day of Particulate Matter less than 10 microns (PM10).
ROG emissions were estimated at a maximum of 4.47 lbs/day or 0.62 tons/year, below the 137 lbs/day or 4.5 tons/year threshold. NOx emissions were estimated at a maximum of 40.72 lbs/day or 5.54 tons/year, below the 137 lbs/day or 4.5 tons/year threshold. Total PM10 emissions were estimated at a maximum of 11.72 lbs/day or 1.92 tons/year, which is below the 80 lbs/day threshold.
Additionally, no additional emissions are anticipated with operational impacts as the roadway would only be widened to include a 12-foot wide two-way left turn lane the entire length of Pentz Road from Skyway to the Pearson intersection, and no additional capacity is proposed with the Project. Therefore, operational air quality impacts would not be substantial. The project’s air quality emissions would not exceed any applicable thresholds of significance for either construction or operation of the roadway. Further, no cumulatively considerable impacts to criteria pollutants in non-attainment are anticipated.
The proposed project would not directly result in population growth in the vicinity due to the nature of the project as an improvement of an identified evacuation route along Pentz Road. Although implementation of the proposed roadway widening would lead to overall minor increases in emissions of criteria pollutants during construction, these would be consistent with all federal and state guidelines and consistent with the applicable air quality plans. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant.
Sensitive receptors in vicinity of the Project include residences located adjacent to the existing Pentz Road. As shown above, the proposed project would not result in emissions during temporary construction or long-term operations that would expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. All estimated emissions are under the thresholds of significance; no impacts are anticipated.
Land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agriculture, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding plants. The proposed project is not within any such land uses, and the project would be widening an existing road. The Pentz Road Widening would therefore not result in any potential sources of objectionable odors that would affect a substantial number of people.
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies along with the implementation of the Avoidance and Minimization Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 below, would ensure that air quality impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to air quality resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
82 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
19 Avoidance and Minimization Measures
As operational emissions are not anticipated to exceed the BCAQMD thresholds, no avoidance and minimization measures are required for operation of the Pentz Road Widening. The following avoidance and minimization measures will be implemented during construction of the Pentz Road Widening:
AQ-1: The following practices describe exhaust emission control from diesel powered fleets working at a construction site. California regulations limit idling from both on-road and offroad diesel powered equipment. The California Air Resources Board enforces the idling limitations.
• Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes [required by California Code of Regulations, Title 13, sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485]. Provide clear signage that posts this requirement for workers at the entrances to the site. Although not required by local or state regulation, many construction companies have equipment inspection and maintenance programs to ensure work and fuel efficiencies. • Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.
AQ-2: Implement the following construction emission control practices to reduce fugitive dust:
• Water all exposed surfaces at least one time daily. Exposed surfaces include (but are not limited to) soil piles, graded areas, unpaved parking areas, staging areas, and access roads.
• Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour. 83 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
20 3.4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or
by the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
B) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, and regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife or
US Fish and Wildlife Service?
X
C) Have a substantial adverse effect on state
or federally protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
X
D) Interfere substantially with the movement of
any resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the
use of wildlife nursery sites?
X
E) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a
tree preservation policy or ordinance?
X
F) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Conservation Community Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
X
Questions A through F
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, there are 10 federally listed threatened, endangered, or candidate species within Butte County, and 13 state listed species of special concern or threatened species listed. Additionally, there are several freshwater ponds and creeks within the Town limits and implementation of the improvements may result in adverse impacts to sensitive natural communities such as riparian habitat. There are currently no adopted or proposed habitat conservation plans (HCPs), natural community conservation plans (NCCPs), or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plans that affect the Town.
84 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
21 Literature research was conducted through the USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) Species List Generator (USFWS 2025), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW 2025) California Natural Diversity Database, the California Native Plant Society Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2025), and National Marine Fisheries Service West Coast Region Species List (NMFS 2025) to identify habitats and special-status species having the potential to occur within the Project Biological Study Area (BSA) (see Attachment B). The only special-status species with low potential to occur within the project area is the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii; FYLF), based on multiple recent (2019) CNDDB occurrences of FYLF within drainages located approximately 500 feet east of Pentz Road. The Feather River Distinct Population Segment (Rana boylii pop. 2) of this species, listed as threatened under both California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA), occurs within Butte County, where the project is proposed.
Suitable breeding habitat for this species was observed in the BSA within Dry Creek located adjacent to the stormdrain outfall locations. Dry Creek and associated riparian habitat could be suitable for dispersal for this species when water is present. Dry Creek is classified as intermittent in this location and only contains water and suitable habitat during the rainy season. In addition, there are known populations of foothill yellow-legged frogs within nearby streams, including Little Butte Creek and Honey Run, less than two miles west of the project. Additionally, there are drainage ditches that border Pentz Road which are dry for most of the year. The recent occurrences near the project site indicate that there is a low potential for FYLF to disperse through the project area during or immediately following rain events.
Although this species was not observed during the biological reconnaissance surveys, because there is suitable habitat within the BSA, and the project is within the proximity of dispersal and/or seasonal movement patterns for the species, there is potential for this species to be in the footprint.
Construction activities, including vegetation removal, grading, paving, vehicle movement, excavating, and drainage improvements could result in direct and indirect impacts on special status amphibians if they were to be present in the construction area. Direct impacts on special status amphibian species could include trampling or crushing should they be in or moving through the project area during construction. Indirect impacts could include upland habitat loss and a temporary increase in noise, vibration, and human activity during construction. Ground disturbance would be conducted near aquatic features and associated upland areas, which is suitable habitat for special-status amphibian species, including foothill-yellow legged frog. With the implementation of avoidance and minimization measure, adverse impacts on special-status amphibians would be avoided.
Due to the type of project (widening an existing road and construct stormdrain outfalls with biological monitors) there will be no impact to any federally listed threatened or endangered species, their critical habitat or essential fish habitat. This determination matches the NES-MI for Pentz Pathway Phase II signed by Caltrans in 2022, with the only special-status species with low potential to occur within the project area is the foothill yellow-legged frog (Rana boylii; FYLF).
With implementation of BIO-1 through BIO-10 along with FYLF protective measures BIO-11 and BIO-12, there would be no potential to effect FYLF and no impacts to FYLF are anticipated to result from this project.
These activities will be primarily confined to the existing roadway and shoulders within the proposed construction area; however, storm drain outfalls will be constructed adjacent to Dry 85 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
22 Creek but will not encroach on any wetlands. A jurisdictional delineation was previously conducted for the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project and confirmed the project footprint will not encroach on any jurisdictional wetlands. Implementation of standard required construction practices for the control of stormwater runoff and erosion would prevent any impacts to adjacent water resources Conclusion
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies, including Policies OCEP-24 and OCEP-26, would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies, along with the implementation of the Avoidance and Minimization Measures BIO-1 through BIO-12 below, and ensure that biological resource impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to biological resources resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Avoidance and Minimization Measures
To avoid direct and indirect effects of the Project on biological resources, the following Avoidance and Minimization Measures will be implemented.
BIO-1: Prior to arrival at the Project site and prior to leaving the Project site, construction equipment that may contain invasive plants and/or seeds will be cleaned to reduce the spreading of noxious weeds.
BIO-2: Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be incorporated into Project design and Project management to minimize impacts on the environment including erosion and the release of pollutants (e.g. oils, fuels):
• Exposed soils and material stockpiles would be stabilized, through watering or other measures, to prevent the movement of dust at the Project site caused by wind and construction activities such as traffic and grading activities; • All construction roadway areas would be properly protected to prevent excess erosion, sedimentation, and water pollution;
• All vehicle and equipment fueling/maintenance would be conducted outside of any surface waters;
• Equipment used in and around jurisdictional waters must be in good working order and free of dripping or leaking contaminants;
• Raw cement, concrete or concrete washings, asphalt, paint or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances that could be hazardous to aquatic life shall be prevented from contaminating the soil or entering jurisdictional waters; • All erosion control measures, and storm water control measures would be properly maintained until the site has returned to a pre-construction state; • All temporarily disturbed areas would be revegetated, either through hydroseeding or other means, with native species
• All construction materials would be hauled off-site after completion of construction; • Upon completion of construction activities, any temporary barriers to surface water flow must be removed in a manner that would allow flow to resume with the least disturbance to the substrate.
86 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
23 BIO-3: Vegetation removal will be avoided to the greatest extent practicable. Where feasible, trees and shrubs will be trimmed rather than removed.
BIO-4: Vehicle maintenance, staging and storing equipment, materials, fuels, lubricants, solvents, and other possible contaminants must remain outside of sensitive habitat marked with high-visibility fencing. Any necessary equipment washing must occur where the water cannot flow into sensitive habitat communities.
BIO-5: A chemical spill kit must be kept onsite and available for use in the event of a spill.
BIO-6: Following the completion of construction, areas disturbed by Project activities would be re-graded and returned to pre-construction conditions.
BIO-7: All food-related trash must be disposed into closed containers and must be removed from the Project area daily. Construction personnel must not feed or otherwise attract wildlife to the Project area.
BIO-8: The contractor must not apply rodenticide or herbicide within the Project area during construction.
BIO-9: If any wildlife is encountered during the course of construction, said wildlife shall be allowed to leave the construction area unharmed.
BIO-10: If project-related activities, including vegetation removal or initial ground disturbance, are scheduled during the nesting bird season (February 1 – August 31) a pre-construction nesting bird survey must be conducted by a Project biologist prior to the start of work. The nesting bird survey must include the Project area plus a 100-foot buffer. Within 2 weeks of the nesting bird survey, all areas surveyed by the biologist must be cleared by the contractor or a supplemental nesting bird survey is required.
An approximate 100 foot no-disturbance buffer will be established around any active nest of migratory birds and an approximate 300 foot no-disturbance buffer will be established around any nesting raptor species.
The contractor must immediately stop work in the buffer area until the appropriate buffer is established and is prohibited from conducting work that could disturb the birds (as determined by the Project biologist and in coordination with wildlife agencies) in the buffer area until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged. A reduced buffer can be established if determined appropriate by the Project biologist.
BIO-11: Construction of the storm drain outfalls are anticipated to occur between April and October, outside of the typical rainy season in Paradise. To protect foothill yellow-legged frogs (FYLF), a pre-construction worker training will be provided by a Project biologist to inform them of the protective measures to be implemented for FYLF. No construction activities will be conducted if: 1) it is raining, 2) there is a greater than 70 percent chance of rain based on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service forecast on any given workday, or 3) a rain event greater than 0.25 inch has occurred within the past 48 hours. If work is anticipated to occur within 48 hours of a rain event, a Project biologist will conduct a visual encounter survey of the project area for FYLF prior to the start of construction. If FYLFs 87 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
24 are found during the survey, the biologist will coordinate with USFWS to determine if additional exclusion measures are required at that time.
BIO-12: Biological monitoring will be provided during any work within the Dry Creek corridor.
This is expected to include vegetation removal and construction of the storm drain outfalls. The biological monitor shall visually scan the work area prior to the start of work each morning to verify FYLF are not present. Daily site photos and monitoring logs will be generated and provided to the Town to document that the project did not result in take of FYLF. 88 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
25 3.5. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update
IS/ND
A) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical or archaeological
resource as defined in § 15064.5?
X
B) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource? X
C) Disturb any human remains? X
Questions A through C
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, implementation of the General Plan could conflict with existing known cultural and historical resources. There is a band of land that runs across southern Paradise, roughly following Honey Run, Buschmann, and Pearson Roads, that is known for archaeological sensitivity. In addition to "known" resource areas, there is the potential that there are undiscovered paleontological or archeological resources that would be encountered and potentially impacted by future construction activities. These resources could include human remains located outside of cemeteries.
Review of the cultural record search obtained for the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project, which encompasses the project area and conducted a search within 1 mile of the Pentz Road Widening Project, indicates no previously recorded resources are within the project footprint. Two resources were recorded approximately 1,000-1,500 feet north of the northern most part of the project at the intersection of Pentz and Skyway. These two resources included a historic ditch and two prehistoric metates within a residential yard used as landscaping accents. No cultural resources were identified within or near the Pentz Road Widening Project. Additionally, tribal consultation conducted under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) for the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project did not indicate any sensitivities within the entire corridor, which includes the entirety of the Pentz Road Widening Project.
The proposed project does not have the potential to affect any archaeological sites or other cultural resources as no cultural resources were identified within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) during archaeological field investigations, background research or through consultation with local Native American tribes. No further archaeological studies are necessary and there is no potential for the project to cause effects to National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA).
Furthermore, SHPO consultation is not required for the project as no cultural resources are present within the APE nor were any identified during field investigations and background research. Therefore, the project will have no effect on any historic or archaeological resources. 89 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
26 Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies, including Implementation Measure OCEI20 would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies, along with the implementation of the avoidance and mitigation measures CUL-1 and CUL-2 below, would ensure that cultural resource impacts would be less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to cultural resources resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Avoidance and Minimization Measures
The following avoidance and minimization measures will be implemented during construction of the Pentz Road Widening to protect cultural resources in the event of an unanticipated discovery:
CUL-1: If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is Caltrans’ policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. Additional archaeological survey would be needed if project limits are extended beyond the present survey limits.
CUL-2: Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code protect Native American burials, skeletal remains and grave goods, regardless of age and provide method and means for the appropriate handling of such remains.
If human remains are encountered, work should halt in that vicinity and the county coroner should be notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist should be contacted to evaluate the situation and Caltrans PQS should be contacted. If the human remains are of Native American origin, the coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of such identification. CEQA details steps to be taken if human burials are of Native American origin. 90 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
27 3.6. ENERGY
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Result in a potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of
energy, or wasteful use of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
X
B) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency? X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, implementation of the General Plan would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. The inclusion of policies to reduce energy consumption and facilitate development that is more energy efficient could have a positive impact on energy consumption.
Construction of the Pentz Road Widening would result in temporary energy use from the use of construction equipment, vehicle trips, and materials transport. The energy use would be shortterm in nature and typical of projects of this type and scale. During operation, there would be energy usage associated with maintenance, resulting in some level of ongoing energy use from vehicles and other equipment to maintain the infrastructure.
The Pentz Road Widening Project’s energy use would not result in any potential significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, during project construction or operation and would not exceed any applicable thresholds of significance for either construction or operation of the infrastructure.
Further, no cumulatively considerable impacts to energy use are anticipated.
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies along with the implementation of the Avoidance and Minimization Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 above, would ensure that energy impacts would be less than significant.
91 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
28 3.7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to the
Project or the
Project Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
X
B) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil? X
C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result
of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
X
D) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18- 1B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property
X
E) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater
X
F) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature
X
Questions A, C, and D
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, there are no known or inferred active faults within the Town and it is not located within an Alquist-Priolo zone. The only known active fault in Butte County is the Cleveland Hills fault, the site of the August 1975 Oroville earthquake. This earthquake had a Richter magnitude of 5.7. Due to the proximity of the Town to the nearby Cleveland Hills Fault, the Town can expect low to medium intensity shocks from time to time. The town is considered to be at a low risk of hazards from liquefaction.
Additionally, future development could be on unstable or expansive soils. 92 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
29 The Pentz Road Widening Project could be susceptible to seismic-related events, including liquefaction, unstable soils, or expansive soils. Implementation of standards contained in Highway Design Manual (HDM) would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan finding and ensure that implementation of the Pentz Road Widening would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to geology and soils resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, future construction could result in the moving and grading of topsoil, which could lead to disturbed soils that are more likely to suffer from erosion from a variety of sources, such as wind and water.
Compliance with the State's General Construction Storm Water Permit minimizes soil erosion and loss of topsoil associated with development.
Construction of the Pentz Road Widening Project would involve ground-disturbing activities such as grading and excavation, which could potentially result in impacts related to soil erosion.
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies along with the required Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB) General Construction Storm Water Permit through preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) for construction of the Pentz Road Widening, and ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies would ensure that soil erosion or loss of topsoil would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to geology and soils resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question E
Construction of the Pentz Road Widening Project would not require any septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems; therefore, implementation of the Pentz Road Widening would not conflict with this requirement and there would be no impact , as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to geology and soils resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question F
Ground-disturbing activities in fossil-bearing soils and rock formations have the potential to damage or destroy unrecorded paleontological resources that may be present below the ground surface; however, due to the limited amount of disturbance associated with construction of the Pentz Road Widening, and lack of paleontological discoveries during recent construction throughout the Town of Paradise, no impacts to paleontological resources are anticipated.
Regardless, implementation of the applicable General Plan policies, including OCEI-20 to stop work if paleontological resources are discovered during construction of the Pentz Road Widening, would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure that paleontological 93 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
30 resource impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to geology and soils resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 94 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
31 3.8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
X
B) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the Town of Paradise does not have a local GHG emission reduction plan, but the General Plan does include policies to increase energy efficiency. The General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND is consistent with the Town of Paradise General Plan energy goals, AB 32, and State’s GHG reduction goals.
Construction of the Pentz Road Widening would result in temporary greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the use of construction equipment, vehicle trips, and materials transport. These emissions would be short-term in nature and typical of projects of this type and scale. During operation, maintenance of the infrastructure would result in some level of ongoing GHG emissions from vehicles.
The Project’s construction emissions were estimated using Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 9.0.0, which is the accepted model for all CEQA roadway projects. Construction activities from the Project are estimated to result in approximately 1,386 tons of CO2e during construction, or approximately 10,186 lbs/day. The project’s air quality emissions would not exceed any applicable thresholds of significance for GHG during either construction or operation of the infrastructure. The Pentz Road Widening Project’s air quality emissions would not exceed any applicable thresholds of significance for either construction or operation of the facility. Further, no cumulatively considerable impacts to criteria pollutants in non-attainment are anticipated.
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies along with the implementation of the Avoidance and Minimization Measures AQ-1 and AQ-2 above, would ensure that greenhouse gas impacts would remain less than significant.
Impacts to greenhouse gases resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 95 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
32 3.9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
X
B) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the likely release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
X
C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
X
D) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
X
E) For a project located within an airport land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard or excessive noise for
people residing or working in the project
area?
X
F) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
X
G) Expose people or structures, either directly
or indirectly, to the risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
X
Questions A, B, and D
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the Town of Paradise has one case that is listed as open on the State Water Resources Control Board GeoTracker website. The case is related to a 500-gallon underground storage tank discovered during Camp Fire debris removal southeast of the Clark Road/Cypress Lane intersection.
Although the tank has been removed, the case is under investigation and kerosene is the potential 96 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
33 contaminant of concern. All development would comply with local, State, and federal regulations regarding hazardous wastes.
GeoTracker and EnivroStor database searches completed (see Attachment C). The GeoTracker database shows 2 locations within 3000 feet of the proposed project area which are both closed, and the EnviroStor database shows no locations within 3000 feet of the proposed project area.
The nearest sites to the proposed project fall approximately 1.5 - 2.0 miles east of Pentz Road and will not be disturbed by construction activities due to the proximity.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would introduce additional use of hazardous materials during construction as well as require the transport and storage of additional hazardous materials.
Compliance with state and federal rules and regulations would ensure that hazardous and hazardous materials would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to hazards and hazardous materials resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question C
The Pentz Road Widening Project is adjacent to the Paradise Ridge Elementary School and the Children's Community Charter School; however, the contractor would comply with local, State, and federal regulations regarding transport, use, and disposal of hazardous wastes during construction; therefore, the Pentz Road Widening would have a less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Question E
The Pentz Road Widening Project is not within two miles of a public airport or public use airport; therefore, the Pentz Road Widening would have no impact, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Question F
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the main evacuation routes in Paradise are along Skyway, Clark Road, and Pentz Road. Each of these roads runs north-south and secondary evacuation routes run east- west to connect residents to these roads. Specific evacuation routes will vary depending on the emergency’s location, direction, and rate of spread. In addition, the Town’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) was developed in response to the Camp Fire and includes analysis and recommendations related to local road safety, evacuation planning, parking, and circulation/roadway improvements. Finally, the Butte County Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) also provides guidance on evacuation and emergency response. A component of Goal 5 of the LHMP is “improvements to evacuation route infrastructure.” The LHMP was adopted in 2019, and updated in 2024, and is annually reviewed by the Butte County Office of Emergency Services. The Project incorporates by reference the LHMP and would facilitate, not impair, implementation of the LHMP.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies, the TMP, and the LHMP, would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies to ensure that the impacts remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND. 97 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
34 Impacts to hazards and hazardous materials resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question G
According to the 2025 Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map released by the State Fire Marshal, the entire Town is identified by CAL FIRE as a very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ). The General Plan Update includes policies and programs to reduce fire risk, including but not limited to the creation of Wildfire Risk Reduction Buffers, the clustering of development in the SSA where it is flatter and easier to evacuate, establishment and enforcement of fuels management programs and education, analysis and potential implementation of more stringent fire-resistant building requirements, and implementation of community-wide evacuation drills. Such policies and programs would reduce the risk of loss, injury, or death due to wildfire.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would widen the existing roadway to the east to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road. The Project does not have the potential to expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires; and instead would improve the evacuation route during any future wildland fire in the area.
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure impacts remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to hazards and hazardous materials resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 98 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
35 3.10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
X
B) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater
recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
X
C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:
i. Result in substantial erosion or siltation on or
off-site;
ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite;
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;
or
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
X
D) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
X
E) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
X
Questions A and C.i-iii
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, development could result in both construction and operational impacts to water quality and discharge standards. Potential construction impacts include grading and vegetation removal activities that would result in the exposure of raw soil materials to the natural elements (wind, rain, etc.).
Increased impervious surfaces and grading and vegetation removal activities could also increase surface runoff and potentially contribute to the potential for localized flooding and/or erosion.
Development occurring in the town would be required to comply with all applicable regulations, 99 Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
36 including the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permits enforced by the RWQCB.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would introduce construction and operation of a new facility within the Town that could result in erosion and siltation, and would increase the rate and amount of surface runoff due to new impervious surfaces; however, it is not anticipated the road widening would violate any water quality standards or substantially alter the existing drainage pattern as the Project proposes to improve the storm drain system to tie into the storm drain system being constructed as part of the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project. Improvements are being proposed along the east side of Pentz Road where an existing roadside drainage ditch collects and conveys storm drain water flow, along with numerous driveways with small cross gutters exist the side of the road, and this will be captured in the storm drain system improvements. The storm drain system improvements are sized to accommodate flows from the Project area and will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern. Further, new storm drain outfalls are proposed as part of this Project, which will collect water from the storm drain system improvements and outfall adjacent to Dry Creek at numerous locations along the alignment. Construction of the storm drain outfalls are anticipated to occur between April and October, outside of the typical rainy season in Paradise to minimize any temporary impacts during construction relating to surface runoff. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure that hydrology and water quality impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to hydrology and water quality resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Questions B and E
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, The primary source of water in Paradise is treated surface water from Magalia Reservoir and Paradise Reservoir. Groundwater supplies make up only a very small portion of the potable water supplies used to serve Paradise.
The Pentz Road Widening would result in a slight increase of impervious surfaces within the site, which would reduce the infiltration of groundwater compared to existing conditions. However, due to the limited amount of additional impervious surfaces, this would not represent a substantial source of groundwater recharge.
Additionally, as groundwater is not a primary source of potable water in the area, and the loss of groundwater infiltration at the site has been previously anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the Pentz Road Widening Project would not trigger new or more severe impacts.
Impacts to hydrology and water quality resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Questions C.iv and D
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, Paradise’s location on a ridge makes it less susceptible to flooding and it does not have any designated flood 100
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
37 hazard areas as depicted on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM). The entire Town of Paradise is located outside both the 1 percent and 0.2 percent annual chance flood zone as defined by FEMA. It is not located near any ocean, coast, or seiche hazard areas. Any flooding that occurs is localized in nature, resulting from a temporary lack of capacity or blockage of a drainage basin.
Therefore, impacts to hydrology and water quality resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 101
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
38 3.11. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Physically divide an established community? X
B) Cause a significant environmental impact due
to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an environmental effect?
X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, implementation of the General Plan would not physically divide an established community. The General Plan would change the existing Municipal Code and Zoning Map; however, this impact would be less than significant.
As no changes to land use and planning will result from the Pentz Road Widening Project, this was adequately addressed in the EIR. As there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review and no impacts are anticipated.
102
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
39 3.12. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
X
B) Result in the loss of availability of a locallyimportant mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the Town of Paradise is not classified by the Department of Conservation as having any Mineral Land Classification and implementation of the General Plan would have no impact on mineral resources.
As no changes to mineral resources will result from the Pentz Road Widening Project, this was adequately addressed in the EIR. As there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review and no impacts are anticipated.
103
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
40 3.13. NOISE
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the vicinity of the project in excess of
standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
X
B) Generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels? X
C) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public
use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
X
Question A
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the primary sources of noise are construction noise (short-term) and increased noise from vehicle traffic (operational). Construction would generate temporary short-term sources of noise that would be subject to the Town’s allowable construction time periods. Increases in noise associated with vehicle traffic would be relatively minor. Future construction and operation would also be subject to the Town’s General Plan policies and Noise Ordinance, including noise performance standards and community noise exposure compatibility.
Construction
Per Section 9.18.160 of the Town’s Municipal Code for Construction or demolition—Generally, construction equipment or tools are prohibited between seven p.m. and six a.m. on weekdays or at any time on Sundays or holidays.
Project construction activities would include grading, storm drain improvements, and construction of the widened roadway. Project construction noise would be generated by diesel engine-driven construction equipment used for site preparation and grading, construction, loading, unloading, and placing materials and paving. Diesel engine-driven trucks also would bring materials to the site and remove the soils from excavation.
Construction equipment with a diesel engine typically generates maximum noise levels from 70 to 95 A-weighted decibels dBA equivalent noise level (Leq) at a distance of 50 feet (Federal Highway Administration [FHWA] 2006 and 2008, Federal Transit Authority 2006). During construction, equipment moves to different locations and goes through varying load cycles, and 104
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
41 there are breaks for the operators and for non-equipment tasks, such as measurement. During grading activities, typical construction equipment average hourly noise levels would be 82 dBA Leq at 50 feet. Grading and construction activities would occur within an approximate 25 acre area. The zoning surrounding the Project is primarily residential. Noise levels of 82 dBA Leq at 50 feet would attenuate to 70 dBA Leq at 200 feet. Although the existing adjacent residences would be exposed to construction noise levels that could be heard above ambient conditions, the exposure would be temporary. Construction sounds between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. are allowed under the Town’s Municipal Code, and construction is recommended to conclude after 7:00 p.m.
As construction activities associated with the project would comply with noise level limits from the County’s Noise Ordinance, temporary increases in noise levels from construction activities would be less than significant.
Operation
The Town’s General Plan identifies the maximum allowable noise exposure from transportation noise sources to be 60 dBA community noise equivalent level (CNEL) with a conditionally acceptable limit of 68 dBA CNEL. As the roadway will not be increasing capacity and no additional vehicles are anticipated to be traveling along Pentz Road as a result of the widening, transportation noise as a result of the project is not anticipated to generate significant noise levels.
Additionally, as the travel lanes will only be moving approximately 12 feet to the east to accommodate the two-way left turn lane, this is not considered a substantial horizontal alteration that would halve the distance between traffic noise and the closest receptor; therefore, no noticeable change in the noise environmental is anticipated with the Project.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would introduce new sources of noise during both construction and operation; however, these sources of noise would be in compliance with applicable Town noise ordinance and would not substantially increase ambient noise levels beyond acceptable levels. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure that noise impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to noise resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question B
Construction activities produce varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods employed. While ground vibrations from typical construction activities very rarely reach levels high enough to cause damage to structures, special consideration must be made when sensitive or historic land uses are near the construction site. The construction activities that typically generate the highest levels of vibration are blasting and impact pile driving. However, the project would not require blasting or pile driving. On-site construction equipment that would cause the most noise and vibration would be associated with site grading. According to the Caltrans, vibration levels associated with the use of bulldozers range from approximately 0.003 to 0.089 in/sec PPV at 25 feet. The closest structure is located approximately 25 feet from where grading activities would occur; therefore, vibration levels at not anticipated to exceed 0.1 in/sec PPV.
Groundborne vibration impacts during project construction would be less than significant. The project does not include any operational sources of vibration.
Question C
105
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
42 No public or private airports are located within two miles of the project site and would thus not result in the exposure of people on or off-site to excessive noise levels. As there are no airports within two miles from the project site, no impacts would occur. 106
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
43 3.14. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Induce substantial unplanned population
growth in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (e.g., through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
X
B) Displace substantial numbers of existing
people or housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, almost the entirety of the goals, policies, and programs are to rebuild housing for those who lost their homes in the Camp Fire and would therefore accommodate growth rather than induce it. The General Plan would not displace existing housing or create a situation where replacement housing would be necessary.
As no changes to population and housing will result from the Pentz Road Widening Project, this was adequately addressed in the EIR. As there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review and no impacts are anticipated.
107
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
44 3.15. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to the
Project or the
Project Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Fire protection?
B) Police protection?
C) Schools?
D) Parks?
E) Other Public Facilities?
X
Questions A through E
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, the Town of Paradise and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) provide fire protection services through a cooperative agreement. By contracting with CAL FIRE, the Town is able to staff two fire stations with three-person engine companies, and one station with a twoperson engine company. In addition to the Town’s resources, CAL FIRE maintains their own stations in Paradise and the neighboring community of Magalia. The Paradise General Plan establishes a standard of a five-minute response time for 90 percent of all emergency incidents within Town limits.
The Paradise Police Department (PPD) currently has 19 employees, including 1 chief, 2 lieutenants, 5 sergeants, and 11 officers. PPD currently has 14 volunteer staff members as well.
The average emergency response time is just over five minutes, and the average non-emergency response time is just over seven minutes.
The Paradise Unified School District (PUSD) currently serves approximately 3,500 students across three elementary schools, one middle school, two high schools, and one online learning academy. The General Plan would help facilitate residents’ return to Paradise and would bring the Town back to pre-fire population levels that were historically accommodated by services, including school services.
The Town of Paradise is located within the Paradise Recreation and Park District (PRPD), which serves over 50,000 individuals in the Town of Paradise and some surrounding areas within Butte County. The PRPD maintains 73 acres of developed park land and another 358 acres of natural open space. The Town of Paradise residents have complete access to facilities, programing, and special events.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would not increase demand for public services including fire protection and police protection no impacts are anticipated. No changes to schools are anticipated with implementation of the Project. Additionally, implementation of the Project would provide an improved emergency evacuation route that could be utilized by CAL FIRE, PPD, and other public services when needed. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure that impacts to public services would 108
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
45 remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to public services resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 109
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
46 3.16. RECREATION
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
X
B) Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, The Town of Paradise is located within the Paradise Recreation and Park District (PRPD), which serves over 50,000 individuals in the Town of Paradise and some surrounding areas within Butte County. The PRPD maintains 73 acres of developed park land and another 358 acres of natural open space.
The Town of Paradise residents have complete access to facilities, programing, and special events..
As no changes to recreation will result from the Pentz Road Widening Project, this was adequately addressed in the EIR. There would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review and no impacts are anticipated.
110
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
47 3.17. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadways, bicycle, and
pedestrian facilities?
X
B) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
X
C) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g. sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
X
D) Result in inadequate emergency access? X
Question A
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, no components of the General Plan conflict with the transportation plans or their goals, objectives, policies, and implementation measures, and no aspect of the General Plan conflicts with existing or planned bicycle facilities, rail facilities, or transit service.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would implement the improvements identified in the Transportation Master Plan, which the Project was described as a roadway widening for emergency response along segments of Pentz Road. No conflicts with any program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system are anticipated. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to transportation and circulation resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
Question B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, a Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) assessment was conducted utilizing the BCAG travel demand model to assess the baseline and future year average VMT per resident for the transportation analysis zones (TAZs) that comprise the Paradise planning area and Butte County. The average VMT per resident in Paradise is 36 to 42 percent higher than the county average in baseline and future year conditions, respectively. The General Plan was found to result in a significant VMT impact, 111
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
48 consistent with the findings of the Butte County Association of Governments (BCAG) 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities strategy (RTP/SCS).
As the Pentz Road Widening Project will not be adding any additional capacity along Pentz Road, and operational vehicle trips would only be widened to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road, there would be no additional VMT or induced VMT as a result of the Project. Therefore, no conflicts or inconsistencies with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b) are anticipated. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure impacts would be less than significant.
Question C
The Pentz Road Widening Project would not include any new sharp curves or dangerous intersections and would not be located in the vicinity of any such roadway features. The roadway improvements would be in compliance with current design standards. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Question D
The recommended circulation improvements including the Pentz Road Widening will provide benefits for emergency preparedness, response, and evacuation, and roads shall would be improved for emergency vehicle access, particularly in high wildland fire hazard areas. As the Pentz Road Widening Project is implementing improvements to improve emergency access, the Project impacts would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
112
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
49 3.18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project
or the
Project Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in
Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k).
X
B) A resource determined by the lead agency,
in its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria
set forth in subdivision (c) of Public
Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying
the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of
Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of
the resource to a California Native American
tribe.
X
Questions A and B
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, pursuant to AB 52 and SB 18 and according to Government Code Section 65352.3, written notices about the Project were sent to the following tribes: United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria, Mooretown Rancheria, Mechoopda Indian Tribe, Greenville Rancheria, Berry Creek Rancheria, Enterprise Rancheria, Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California, and Konkow Valley Band of Maidu (Tribes). The United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria responded to confirm that the Project site is outside of its geographic area of traditional and cultural affiliations. The Berry Creek Rancheria tribe requested a consultation related to the sewer system and the corresponding Sewer Service Overlay Zone, and consultation occurred between the tribe and the Town’s engineering department (the lead agency for the Town’s sewer project).
Upon further conversations with the tribe, the Berry Creek Rancheria shared that they did not have concerns with the Project. Consistent with Government Code 21080.3.2, tribal consultation is considered concluded given the tribe’s input that no significant effect exists.
As mentioned in the Cultural Resources section, the proposed project does not have the potential to affect any tribal cultural resources as no cultural resources were identified within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) during archaeological field investigations, background research or through consultation with local Native American tribes.
Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies, including Implementation Measure OCEI20 would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure that cultural resource impacts would be less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
113
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
50 Impacts to cultural resources resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review.
Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 114
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
51 3.19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update
IS/ND
A) Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment, or storm water
drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the
construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
X
B) Have sufficient water supplies available to
serve the project and reasonably foreseeable
future development during normal, dry, and
multiple dry years?
X
C) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may
serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X
D) Generate solid waste in excess of State or
local standards, or in excess of the capacity
of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
X
E) Comply with federal, state, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
Questions A through E
According to the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND, construction anticipated with the General Plan would not result in the construction of new or expanded utility or service systems. Solid waste generation in the town is primarily disposed of at the Neal Road Recycling and Waste Facility (NRRWF), which is owned and operated by Butte County. The NRRWF has a permitted capacity of approximately 25.3 million cubic yards and a remaining capacity of 20.8 million cubic yards. The facility is estimated to operate until 2048, accommodating
2.5 to 3.5 percent annual increases in solid waste due to anticipated growth in the County. Future development under the General Plan would be within this capacity. Additionally, the General Plan in compliance with federal, State, regional, and local governmental statues, and regulations regarding solid waste.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would require some utilities and service systems during construction, including the generation of solid waste; however, the Project would not require new 115
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
52 utilities to be constructed with exception of improvements to the storm drain system which would tie into the storm drain system being constructed as part of the Pentz Pathway Phase II Project.
The storm drain system improvements are sized to accommodate flows from the Project area.
Additionally, storm drain outfalls are proposed as part of this Project, which will collect water from the storm drain system improvements and outfall adjacent to Dry Creek at numerous locations along the alignment; however, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result. The Project will continue to comply with federal, State, regional, and local governmental statues, and regulations regarding solid waste. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure compliance with applicable General Plan policies and ensure that impacts to utilities and service systems would remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
Impacts to utilities and service systems resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant. 116
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
53 3.20. WILDFIRE
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the Project:
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project or
the Project
Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update
IS/ND
A) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
X
B) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other
factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby
expose project occupants to, pollutant
concentrations from a wildfire or the
uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
C) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power
lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate
fire risk or that may result in temporary or
ongoing impacts to the environment?
X
D) Expose people or structures to significant
risks, including downslope or downstream
flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,
post-fire slope instability, or drainage
changes?
X
Questions A through D
According to the 2025 Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone Map released by the State Fire Marshal, the entire Town is identified by CAL FIRE as a very high fire hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ). implementation of the General Plan would incorporate improvements to major and secondary evacuation routes, potential areas of congestion (intersections or roadway segments), and roadway extensions/connections on dead-end streets for additional routes and increased evacuation capacity. The General Plan would not impair evacuation planning and would instead work in tandem with ongoing efforts to improve emergency response and evacuation.
Additionally, Paradise does not have any designated flood hazard areas as depicted on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM).
Any flooding that occurs is localized in nature, resulting from a temporary lack of capacity or blockage of a drainage basin.
The Pentz Road Widening Project would widen the existing roadway to the east to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road. The Project does not have the potential to expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to wildland fires; and instead would improve the evacuation route during any future wildland fire in the area. Implementation of the applicable General Plan policies would ensure impacts remain less than significant, as anticipated in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND.
117
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
54 Impacts to wildfire resulting from the Pentz Road Widening Project were adequately addressed in the EIR, and there would not be any peculiar effects requiring further CEQA review. Therefore, impacts are considered less than significant.
118
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
55 3.21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Significant
Impact
Peculiar to
the Project
or the
Project Site
Significant
Impact due to
New
Information
Impact
Adequately
Addressed in
the General
Plan EIR and
Housing and
Safety
Elements
Update IS/ND
A) Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below selfsustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially
reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
X
B) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
X
C) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
Question A
Implementation of the Pentz Road Widening Project would have the potential to adversely impact special-status animals and previously undiscovered cultural, tribal cultural resources, and/or human remains. The Pentz Road Widening Project would implement and comply with applicable General Plan policies, as discussed throughout this Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist. With compliance with General Plan policies, compliance with federal, State, and regional regulations, and application of standard BMPs during construction, the following were adequately addressed in the environmental documentation and the Pentz Road Widening Project would not: 1) degrade the quality of the environment; 2) substantially reduce or impact the habitat of fish or wildlife species; 3) cause fish or wildlife populations to drop below self-sustaining levels; 4) threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; 5) reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; or 6) eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
Question B
The Pentz Road Widening Project, as proposed, is listed as an anticipated improvement in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND. Thus, the Pentz Road Widening Project has been considered in the cumulative analysis contained in this document. The 119
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
56 General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND concluded that all impacts were less than significant.
CEQA Section 15183 allows for future environmental documents to limit examination of environmental effects to those impacts which were not already analyzed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, provided that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. Given that the Pentz Road Widening Project, as proposed, is listed as an anticipated improvement in the General Plan, cumulative impacts associated with construction of the Pentz Road Widening have been anticipated by the Town and were analyzed in the EIR, and the Pentz Road Widening was found to not result in any significant impacts. The Pentz Road Widening Project does not include cumulative impacts that were not analyzed or discussed in the previous EIR. Furthermore, as discussed throughout this Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, the Pentz Road Widening and all impacts associated with the Project were adequately addressed in the EIR and would not result in any peculiar effects that would require further CEQA review. As such, this Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist does not include any substantial new information that shows impacts are more severe than previously discussed, and further analysis is not required prior to construction of the Pentz Road Widening.
Question C
As described in this Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, the Pentz Road Widening Project would comply with all applicable General Plan policies, County standards, other applicable local, county and State regulations. In addition, as discussed in the air quality, geology and soils, hazards, and noise sections of this Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist, the Pentz Road Widening Project would not cause substantial effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to air pollutants, geologic hazards, hazardous materials, and excessive noise, beyond the effects previously analyzed as part of the EIR. Therefore, further analysis is not required in this Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist.
120
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
57 4. REFERENCES
Butte County Association of Governments (BCAG). March 21, 2017. Air Quality Emissions Analysis and Conformity Determination.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2025b. California Natural Diversity Database. Available at: <http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/> (accessed:
1/13/2025).
California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2025. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California. Available at: <http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/> (accessed 1/13/2025).
Dokken Engineering (Dokken). 2022c. Historic Property Survey Report/Archaeological Survey Report. Folsom, CA. November 2022.
Dokken Engineering (Dokken). 2022d. Natural Environmental Study (Minimal Impacts). Folsom, CA. November 2022.
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2025. NMFS Species List for Pentz Road Widening Project (requested: 1/13/2025).
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD). 2025. Roadway Construction Emissions Model (version 9.0.1).
Town of Paradise. June 2019. Long-Term Recovery Plan.
Town of Paradise. November 2022. Long-Term Recovery Plan Update: Progress and New Priorities.
Town of Paradise (Mark Thomas). May 2022. The Town of Paradise Transportation Master Plan.
Town of Paradise (Wood Rodgers). June 7, 2022. Town of Paradise Mater Storm Drain Master Plan.
Town of Paradise General Plan. 1994. Town of Paradise 1994 General Plan, Volume I Policy Document. Available at:
<https://www.townofparadise.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/3251/t ownofparadise-generalplan_1994.pdf> (accessed 6/9/2025) Town of Paradise General Plan. 2022. Town of Paradise Housing and Safety Elements Initial Study Document. Available at:
<https://www.townofparadise.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/3948 1/initial_study-negative_declaration.pdf> (accessed 6/9/2025) United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Official Species List: U.S. Department of the Interior – Fish and Wildlife Service: Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office.
Consultation Code 2025-0098776 (requested: 5/19/2025).
121
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
ATTACHMENT A. ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL
122
Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 9.0.0
Daily Emission Estimates for -> Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Project Phases (Pounds) ROG (lbs/day) CO (lbs/day) NOx (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) SOx (lbs/day) CO2 (lbs/day) CH4 (lbs/day) N2O (lbs/day) CO2e (lbs/day)Grubbing/Land Clearing 1.24 12.11 9.67 10.45 0.45 10.00 2.47 0.39 2.08 0.03 2,655.89 0.62 0.05 2,686.20Grading/Excavation 4.47 44.52 40.72 11.72 1.72 10.00 3.61 1.53 2.08 0.11 10,077.16 2.90 0.12 10,186.01Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 2.86 30.05 25.03 11.05 1.05 10.00 3.03 0.95 2.08 0.06 6,119.25 1.21 0.08 6,173.61Paving 1.54 19.60 13.03 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.03 3,270.31 0.78 0.06 3,306.62Maximum (pounds/day) 4.47 44.52 40.72 11.72 1.72 10.00 3.61 1.53 2.08 0.11 10,077.16 2.90 0.12 10,186.01Total (tons/construction project) 0.62 6.43 5.54 1.92 0.24 1.68 0.56 0.21 0.35 0.01 1,371.89 0.35 0.02 1,385.96 Notes: Project Start Year -> 2026
Project Length (months) -> 18
Total Project Area (acres) -> 24
Maximum Area Disturbed/Day (acres) -> 1
Water Truck Used? -> Yes
Phase Soil Asphalt Soil Hauling Asphalt Hauling Worker Commute Water Truck Grubbing/Land Clearing 0 000 560 40
Grading/Excavation 0000 1,160 40
Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0000 920 40
Paving 0000 760 40
CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs.
Total Emission Estimates by Phase for -> Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Project Phases (Tons for all except CO2e. Metric tonnes for CO2e) ROG (tons/phase) CO (tons/phase) NOx (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) SOx (tons/phase) CO2 (tons/phase) CH4 (tons/phase) N2O (tons/phase) CO2e (MT/phase)Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.02 0.24 0.19 0.21 0.01 0.20 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.00 52.59 0.01 0.00 48.25Grading/Excavation 0.35 3.53 3.22 0.93 0.14 0.79 0.29 0.12 0.16 0.01 798.11 0.23 0.01 731.86Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.20 2.08 1.73 0.77 0.07 0.69 0.21 0.07 0.14 0.00 424.06 0.08 0.01 388.13Paving 0.05 0.58 0.39 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 97.13 0.02 0.00 89.09Maximum (tons/phase) 0.35 3.53 3.22 0.93 0.14 0.79 0.29 0.12 0.16 0.01 798.11 0.23 0.01 731.86Total (tons/construction project) 0.62 6.43 5.54 1.92 0.24 1.68 0.56 0.21 0.35 0.01 1371.89 0.35 0.02 1,257.33CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs.The CO2e emissions are reported as metric tons per phase.
Daily VMT (miles/day)
Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K.
Pentz Road Widening East
PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified.
Pentz Road Widening East
PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified.Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K.
Total Material Imported/Exported
Volume (yd3/day)
123
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
ATTACHMENT B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SPECIES LISTS AND WETLANDS MAPPER 124
05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
Phone: (916) 414-6600 Fax: (916) 414-6713
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2025-0098776
Project Name: Pentz Road Widening East Project
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 125
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
2 of 8
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at:
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultationhandbook.pdf Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project-related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/whatwe-do.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project-related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project-related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservationmigratory-birds.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office.
126
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
3 of 8
▪
Attachment(s):
Official Species List
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action".
This species list is provided by:
Sacramento Fish And Wildlife Office
Federal Building
2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605
Sacramento, CA 95825-1846
(916) 414-6600
127
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
4 of 8
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2025-0098776
Project Name: Pentz Road Widening East Project
Project Type: Road/Hwy - Maintenance/Modification
Project Description: Pentz Road Widening East Project
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@39.77701935,-121.57957793780571,14z Counties: Butte County, California
128
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
5 of 8
1. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 10 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheries , as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.
NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce.
1 129
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
6 of 8
MAMMALS
NAME STATUS
Gray Wolf Canis lupus
Population: U.S.A.: All of AL, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, IA, IN, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA,
MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VA, VT, WI, and WV; and portions of AZ, NM, OR, UT, and WA. Mexico.
There is final critical habitat for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4488
Endangered
BIRDS
NAME STATUS
California Condor Gymnogyps californianus
Population: Pacific Northwest NEP
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8193
Experimental
Population,
NonEssential
California Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis occidentalis
Population: Sierra Nevada
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7266
Proposed
Threatened
REPTILES
NAME STATUS
Northwestern Pond Turtle Actinemys marmorata
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1111
Proposed
Threatened
AMPHIBIANS
NAME STATUS
California Red-legged Frog Rana draytonii
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2891
Threatened
Foothill Yellow-legged Frog Rana boylii
Population: North Feather Distinct Population Segment (North Feather DPS) There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5133
Threatened
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Proposed
Threatened
130
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
7 of 8
NAME STATUS
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
CRUSTACEANS
NAME STATUS
Conservancy Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta conservatio
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/8246
Endangered
Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp Branchinecta lynchi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/498
Threatened
Vernal Pool Tadpole Shrimp Lepidurus packardi
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2246
Endangered
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
131
Project code: 2025-0098776 05/19/2025 23:00:08 UTC
8 of 8
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency: Paradise town
Name: Zachary Liptak
Address: 110 Blue Ravine Road
Address Line 2: Suite 200
City: Folsom
State: CA
Zip: 95630
Email [email protected]
Phone: 9168580642
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development 132
Pentz Road Widening Project
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team, [email protected]
Wetlands
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Freshwater Pond
Lake
Other
Riverine
May 22, 2025
0 0.5 1 2 mi
0 0.75 1.5 3 km
1:60,187
This page was produced by the NWI mapper
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site.
133
Pentz Road Widening Project
Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist
October 2025
ATTACHMENT C. GEOTRACKER AND ENVIROSTOR RESULTS
134
* +,-./0120/
"
!!
#$%
&'$
()&
4565789:;<<=>?<@>=AB>= 3
C ' D&EFG DHF
'9@>?<I>
E
J G
9@>?<I>
K&F
DL
&
FG9@>?<I>
EM&
&
FG9@>?<I>
NO&F
P
9@>?<I>
EM&Q
O
PR
P
9@>?<I>
SP&P
DLNO&F
P
9@>?<I>
)P D 'T DP
9@>?<I>
DD
PO U
P
9@>?<I>
P
DP&9@>?<I>
CP &'TP
9@>?<I>
VG D
P
R9@>?<I>
T
9 &FD 9@>?<I>
W
9VG D
P
R9@>?<I>
XYZ[Y\Y]^_`ab^]cXYd]
EP
EM%
SGe fg)
&EP
135
136
1 NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk-Recorder
Butte County
155 Nelson Avenue
Oroville, CA 95965
From: Public Works Department
Town of Paradise Posted:_______ through _______
5555 Skyway (date) (date)
Paradise, CA 95969
Project Title: Pentz Road Widening Project
Project Location: Town of Paradise, Butte County, CA. See attached project location map.
Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): Town Rights of Way, 054-220-057, 053-240-029, 053-240-046, 050-180-012, 050-450-025, 050-040-107, 050-013-051, 050-013-054, 050-013-056.
Project Description: The Town of Paradise proposes to widen Pentz Road 500 ft south of Pearson Road to Skyway (3.8 miles). The existing roadway will be widened to the east to improve the evacuation route along Pentz Road by installing a 12-foot wide two-way left turn lane from Skyway to the Pearson intersection. The Project proposes to improve the storm drain system and storm drain outfalls are proposed as part of this Project, which will collect water from the storm drain system improvements and outfall adjacent to Dry Creek at numerous locations.
Lead Agency: Town of Paradise
Applicant: Town of Paradise, 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA 95969 Exemption Status: Ministerial [Section 21080(b); 15268]; Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)];
Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)];
General Rule [Section 15061(b)(3)];
Categorical Exemption [Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning];
Statutory Exemption [Section 15273(a)(4)].
REASONS WHY THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT OR DOES NOT REQUIRE FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION:
The project is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines [Section 15183], which states:
“CEQA mandates that projects which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. This streamlines the review of such projects and reduces the need to prepare repetitive environmental studies.”
The Pentz Road Widening Project is a component within the Town of Paradise General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), certified in 1994, and included as a needed improvement within the General Plan 2022- 2030 Housing and Safety Elements Update Initial Study with Negative Declaration approved by the Town in June 2022. The General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND served as a basis for a Modified Initial Study/15183 Checklist to determine if impacts related to the Pentz Road Widening Project would occur that were not adequately covered in the previously certified environmental documents. The analysis conducted determined that all impacts were previously adequately addressed in the General Plan EIR and Housing and Safety Elements Update IS/ND. Additional avoidance and minimization measures were recommended for project-specific impacts; however, no new mitigation measures were required. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary for this project.
By __________________________________ Date ______________________ Marc Mattox, Public Works Director
Town of Paradise
DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING
137
2 DECLARATION OF FEES DUE
(California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF LEAD AGENCY/APPLICANT:
Town of Paradise
Public Works Department
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
(530) 872-6291
Project: Pentz Road Widening Project
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
☒ A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$50.00 (Fifty Dollars) Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED
☐ A. Negative Declaration
$2,968.75 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
☐ B. Mitigated Negative Declaration
$2,968.75 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
☐ C. Environmental Impact Report
$4,123.50 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
3. ☐ OTHER (Specify) General Rule Exemption
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
THREE COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
ALL APPLICABLE FEES MUST BE PAID AT THE TIME OF FILING ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
THE $50.00 HANDLING FEE IS REQUIRED PER FILING IN ADDITION TO THE FILING FEE SPECIFIED IN FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711.4(d).
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO COUNTY OF BUTTE.
138
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 2(f)
ORIGINATED BY: Jessica Erdahl, Supervising Project Manager REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Program Supplement Grant Agreement Amendment
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes, Tier 1, Evacuation Routes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Approve the revised Program Supplement Agreement No. F020 Rev. 2 to the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects, Agreement No. 03- 5425F15 for the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project - CML 5425(043); and,
2. Adopt Resolution 2025-__ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise authorizing the Town Manager of the Town of Paradise or their designee to sign the revised Program Supplement Agreement No. F020 Rev. 2 to the Administering AgencyState Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects, Agreement No. 03-5425F15 for the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project - CML 5425(043).”
Background:
On June 7, 2019 the Town of Paradise received an authorization to proceed on a new Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) grant in the amount of $550,000 for the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project. This grant provided funding for the environmental review and preliminary design phases of the project.
In Spring 2022, Caltrans announced the Call-for-Projects for the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 6. In June 2022 the Town of Paradise submitted five complete grant applications for funding, including the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project. On December 7, 2022, the California Transportation Committee announced the adoption of Statewide and Small Urban and Rural components of the program, which included the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project. ATP funding in the amount of $12,348,000 will cover final design, right-of-way, construction engineering and the construction components of the project. Required matching and supplemental funds, will be funded by the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) fund.
As the Town rebuilds after the 2018 Camp Fire, it is prioritizing projects to improve connectivity and community pride. The Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project addresses a deficiency in the active transportation network along one of the Town's primary routes, Neal Road. The project aims to catalyze change by closing a major gap in the existing bike path network by providing a safe means for bicyclists and pedestrians to travel to businesses, homes, and recreational opportunities along the project limits. The complete project will provide a multi-modal trail that will separate bicyclists and pedestrians from vehicular traffic along Neal Road from Town limits to the Skyway (1.62 miles).
139
Analysis:
To remain eligible for the recently allocated ATP grant funding, the Town of Paradise is required to execute Program Supplement Agreement revisions which partner with the master Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects (Agreement No. 03-5425R). This supplement agreement revision, included as an attachment, serves as a contract between the Town of Paradise and California Department of Transportation, binding each to certain responsibilities to process this Federally funded project. The attached agreement must be approved by the Town to continue receipt of Federal funds. In addition, the Town is required to adopt a resolution identifying the project and designate an official authorized to execute the Program Supplement Agreement.
Financial Impact:
The Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project is 100% grant funded.
Phase Total Budget ATP CMAQ CDBG-DR
PA&ED $ 598,000.00 $ 550,000.00
$
48,000.00
PSE $ 1,000,000.00 $ 352,000.00
$
648,000.00
RW $ 1,507,000.00 $ 1,486,000.00
$
21,000.00
CE $ 1,629,310.00 $ 1,400,000.00
$
229,310.00
CON $ 13,663,690.00 $ 9,110,000.00
$
4,553,690.00
Total $ 18,398,000.00 $ 12,348,000.00 $ 550,000.00
$
5,500,000.00
Attachments:
A. PSA No. F020 Rev. 2 for Project Skway/Neal Bike/Ped - CML 5425 (043) B. Resolution revised Program Supplement Agreement for Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project - CML 5425(043)
140
F020 Rev. 2
FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS NO 03-5425F15
0319000246
September 16, 2025
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
5425
This Program Supplement hereby adopts and incorporates the Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal Aid which was entered into between the Administering Agency and the State on 04/25/2016 and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is executed in accordance with Article I of the aforementioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the Administering Agency on (See copy attached).
The Administering Agency further stipulates that as a condition to the payment by the State of any funds derived from sources noted below obligated to this PROJECT, the Administering Agency accepts and will comply with the special covenants or remarks set forth on the following pages.
Neal Road between Town Limits and Skyway, and Skyway between Neal Road and Pearson Road
Bike Path 0.0(MILES)
Estimated Cost Federal Funds Matching Funds
Z400 $550,000.00 STATE $1,838,000.00
TOWN OF PARADISE
By ________________________________ By ________________________________ Title _______________________________
Date _______________________________
Attest _______________________________ Date _______________________________ Division of Local Assistance
I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance:
Accounting Officer _______________________ Date _______________ PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO.
to
ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT
Adv. Project ID Date:
Location:
Project Number:
E.A. Number:
Locode:
PROJECT LOCATION:
TYPE OF WORK: LENGTH:
LOCAL OTHER
$3,057,000.00 $669,000.00 $0.00
Chief, Office of Project Management Oversight
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Transportation
$2,388,000.00
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- 1Page of 9
09/29/2025
141
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
1. A. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY will advertise, award and administer this project in accordance with the current published Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
B. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees that it will only proceed with work authorized for specific phase(s) with an "Authorization to Proceed" and will not proceed with future phase(s) of this project prior to receiving an "Authorization to Proceed" from the STATE for that phase(s) unless no further State or Federal funds are needed for those future phase(s).
C. Award information shall be submitted by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY to the District Local Assistance Engineer immediately after project contract award and prior to the submittal of the ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S first invoice for the construction contract.
Failure to do so will cause a delay in the State processing invoices for the construction phase.
Attention is directed to Section 15.7 "Award Package" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
D. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, as a minimum, to submit invoices at least once every six months commencing after the funds are encumbered for each phase by the execution of this Project Program Supplement Agreement, or by STATE's approval of an applicable Finance Letter. STATE reserves the right to suspend future authorizations/obligations for Federal aid projects, or encumbrances for State funded projects, as well as to suspend invoice payments for any on-going or future project by ADMINISTERING AGENCY if PROJECT costs have not been invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY for a six-month period.
If no costs have been invoiced for a six-month period, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit for each phase a written explanation of the absence of PROJECT activity along with target billing date and target billing amount.
ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit the final report documents that collectively constitute a "Report of Expenditures" within one hundred eighty (180) days of PROJECT completion. Failure of ADMINISTERING AGENCY to submit a "Final Report of Expenditures" within 180 days of PROJECT completion will result in STATE imposing sanctions upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY in accordance with the current Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
E. Administering Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race, religion, age, disability, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any Federal-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program Implementation Agreement. The Administering Agency shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of Federal-assisted contracts. The Administering Agency's DBE Implementation Agreement is incorporated by reference in this Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 2 of 9
142
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
Agreement. Implementation of the DBE Implementation Agreement, including but not limited to timely reporting of DBE commitments and utilization, is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this Agreement. Upon notification to the Administering Agency of its failure to carry out its DBE Implementation Agreement, the State may impose sanctions as provided for under 49 CFR Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).
F. Any State and Federal funds that may have been encumbered for this project are available for disbursement for limited periods of time. For each fund encumbrance the limited period is from the start of the fiscal year that the specific fund was appropriated within the State Budget Act to the applicable fund Reversion Date shown on the State approved project finance letter.
Per Government Code Section 16304, all project funds not liquidated within these periods will revert unless an executed Cooperative Work Agreement extending these dates is requested by the ADMINISTERING AGENCY and approved by the California Department of Finance.
ADMINISTERING AGENCY should ensure that invoices are submitted to the District Local Assistance Engineer at least 75 days prior to the applicable fund Reversion Date to avoid the lapse of applicable funds. Pursuant to a directive from the State Controller's Office and the Department of Finance; in order for payment to be made, the last date the District Local Assistance Engineer can forward an invoice for payment to the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office for reimbursable work for funds that are going to revert at the end of a particular fiscal year is May 15th of the particular fiscal year. Notwithstanding the unliquidated sums of project specific State and Federal funding remaining and available to fund project work, any invoice for reimbursement involving applicable funds that is not received by the Department's Local Programs Accounting Office at least 45 days prior to the applicable fixed fund Reversion Date will not be paid. These unexpended funds will be irrevocably reverted by the Department's Division of Accounting on the applicable fund Reversion Date.
G. As a condition for receiving federal-aid highway funds for PROJECT, the Administering Agency certifies that NO members of the elected board, council, or other key decision makers are on the Federal Government Exclusion List. Exclusions can be found at www.sam.gov.
H. This PROJECT is programmed to receive Federal funding from the Active Transportation Program (ATP). Funding may be provided under one or more components. A component(s) specific fund allocation is required, in addition to other requirements, before reimbursable work can occur for the component(s) identified. Each allocation will be assigned an effective date and identify the amount of funds allocated per component(s).
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 3 of 9
143
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
This PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT has been prepared to allow reimbursement of eligible PROJECT expenditures for the component(s) allocated. The start of reimbursable expenditures is restricted to the later of either 1) the effective date of the component specific allocation or the effective date of the federal obligation of funds.
I. STATE and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agree that any additional funds which might be made available by future Federal obligations will be encumbered on this PROJECT by use of a STATE-approved "Authorization to Proceed" and Finance Letter. ADMINISTERING AGENCY also agrees that Federal funds available for reimbursement will be limited to the amounts obligated by the Federal Highway Administration and that STATE funds available for reimbursement will be limited to the amounts allocated by the California Transportation Commission and/or STATE.
J. Upon ADMINISTERING AGENCY request, the CTC and/or STATE may approve supplementary allocations, time extensions, and fund transfers between components. Funds transferred between allocated project components retain their original timely use of funds deadlines, but an approved time extension will revise the timely use of funds criteria for the component(s) and allocation(s) requested. Approved supplementary allocations, time extensions, and fund transfers between components made after the execution of this PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT will be documented and considered subject to the terms and conditions thereof.
Documentation will consist of a Federal Highway Administration-approved "Authorization to Proceed" notification, a STATE approved Allocation Letter, Fund Transfer Letter, Time Extension Letter, and Finance Letter, as appropriate.
K. This PROJECT will be administered in accordance with the applicable CTC STIP guidelines and the Active Transportation Program guidelines as adopted or amended, the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG), and this PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT.
L. The submittal of invoices for PROJECT costs shall be in accordance with the abovereferenced publications and the following. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall invoice STATE for environmental & permits, plans specifications & estimate, and right-of-way costs no later than 180 days after the end of last eligible fiscal year of expenditure. For construction costs, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY has 180 days after project completion or contract acceptance, whichever occurs first, to make the final payment to the contractor and prepare the final Report of Expenditures and final invoice, and submit to STATE for verification and payment.
M. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature and the encumbrance of funds under this Agreement. Funding and reimbursement are available only upon the passage Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 4 of 9
144
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
of the State Budget Act containing these Federal funds.
N. This PROJECT is subject to the timely use of funds provisions enacted by the ATP Guidelines, as adopted or amended, and by approved CTC and State procedures as outlined below.
Funds allocated for the environmental & permits (E&P), plan specifications & estimate (PS&E), and right-of-way components are available for expenditure until the end of the second fiscal year following the year in which the funds were allocated.
Funds allocated for the construction component are subject to an award deadline and contract completion deadline. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to award the contract within 6 months of the construction fund allocation and to complete and accept the construction within 36 months of award.
O. By executing this PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with all reporting requirements in accordance with the Active Transportation Program Guidelines, as adopted or amended.
P. This PROJECT has received funds from Active Transportation Program (ATP). The ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to administer the project in accordance with the CTC Adopted SB1 Accountability and Transparency Guidelines.
2. A. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall conform to all State statutes, regulations and procedures (including those set forth in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and the Local Assistance Program Guidelines, hereafter collectively referred to as "LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES") relating to the federal-aid program, all Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) and 2 CFR Part 200 federal requirements, and all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policy and procedural or instructional memoranda, unless otherwise specifically waived as designated in the executed project-specific PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT.
B. Invoices shall be formatted in accordance with LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES.
C. ADMINISTERING AGENCY must have at least one copy of supporting backup documentation for costs incurred and claimed for reimbursement by ADMINISTERING AGENCY. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to submit supporting backup documentation with invoices if requested by State. Acceptable backup documentation includes, but is not limited to, agency's progress payment to the contractors, copies of cancelled checks showing amounts made payable to vendors and contractors, and/or a computerized summary of PROJECT costs.
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 5 of 9
145
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
D. Indirect Cost Allocation Plan/Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICAP/ICRP), Central Service Cost Allocation Plans and related documentation are to be prepared and provided to STATE (Caltrans Audits & Investigations) for review and approval prior to ADMINISTERING AGENCY seeking reimbursement of indirect costs incurred within each fiscal year being claimed for State and federal reimbursement. ICAPs/ICRPs must be prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, Chapter 5 of the Local Assistance Procedural Manual, and the ICAP/ICRP approval procedures established by STATE.
E. STATE will withhold the greater of either two (2) percent of the total of all federal funds encumbered for each PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT or $40,000 until ADMINISTERING AGENCY submits the Final Report of Expenditures for each completed PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT PROJECT.
F. Payments to ADMINISTERING AGENCY for PROJECT-related travel and subsistence (per diem) expenses of ADMINISTERING AGENCY forces and its contractors and subcontractors claimed for reimbursement or as local match credit shall not exceed rates authorized to be paid rank and file STATE employees under current State Department of Personnel Administration (DPA) rules. If the rates invoiced by ADMINISTERING AGENCY are in excess of DPA rates, ADMINISTERING AGENCY is responsible for the cost difference, and any overpayments inadvertently paid by STATE shall be reimbursed to STATE by ADMINISTERING AGENCY on demand within thirty (30) days of such invoice.
G. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to comply with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirement for Federal Awards.
H. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and will assure that its contractors and subcontractors will be obligated to agree, that Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31, et seq., shall be used to determine the allowability of individual PROJECT cost items.
I. Every sub-recipient receiving PROJECT funds under this AGREEMENT shall comply with 2 CFR, Part 200, 23 CFR, 48 CFR Chapter 1, Part 31, Local Assistance Procedures, Public Contract Code (PCC) 10300-10334 (procurement of goods), PCC 10335-10381 (non-A&E services), and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations.
J. Any PROJECT costs for which ADMINISTERING AGENCY has received payment or credit that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200, 23 CFR, 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31, and other applicable STATE and FEDERAL regulations, are subject to repayment by ADMINISTERING AGENCY to STATE.
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 6 of 9
146
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
K. STATE reserves the right to conduct technical and financial audits of PROJECT WORK and records and ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees, and shall require its contractors and subcontractors to agree, to cooperate with STATE by making all appropriate and relevant PROJECT records available for audit and copying as required by the following paragraph:
ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractors, and STATE shall each maintain and make available for inspection and audit by STATE, the California State Auditor, or any duly authorized representative of STATE or the United States all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of such contracts, including, but not limited to, the costs of administering those various contracts and ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall furnish copies thereof if requested.
All of the above referenced parties shall make such AGREEMENT, PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT, and contract materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the entire PROJECT period and for three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the STATE to the FHWA.
L. ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and subcontractors shall establish and maintain a financial management system and records that properly accumulate and segregate reasonable, allowable, and allocable incurred PROJECT costs and matching funds by line item for the PROJECT. The financial management system of ADMINISTERING AGENCY, its contractors and all subcontractors shall conform to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, enable the determination of incurred costs at interim points of completion, and provide support for reimbursement payment vouchers or invoices set to or paid by STATE.
M. ADMINISTERING AGENCY is required to have an audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 2 CFR 200 if it expends $750,000 or more in Federal Funds in a single fiscal year of the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance.
N. ADMINISTERING AGENCY agrees to include all PROGRAM SUPPLEMENTS adopting the terms of this AGREEMENT in the schedule of projects to be examined in ADMINISTERING AGENCY's annual audit and in the schedule of projects to be examined under its single audit prepared in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200.
O. ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall not award a non-A&E contract over $5,000, construction contracts over $10,000, or other contracts over $25,000 [excluding professional service contracts of the type which are required to be procured in accordance with Government Code sections 4525 (d), (e) and (f)] on the basis of a noncompetitive negotiation for work to be performed under this AGREEMENT without the prior written approval of STATE. Contracts awarded by ADMINISTERING AGENCY, if intended as local match credit, must meet the requirements set forth in this AGREEMENT regarding local match funds.
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 7 of 9
147
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
P. Any subcontract entered into by ADMINISTERING AGENCY as a result of this AGREEMENT shall contain provisions B, C, F, H, I, K, and L under Section 2 of this agreement.
3. The ADMINISTERING AGENCY shall construct the PROJECT in accordance with the scope of work presented in the application and approved by the California Transportation Commission. Any changes to the approved PROJECT scope without the prior expressed approval of the California Transportation Commission are ineligible for reimbursement and may result in the entire PROJECT becoming ineligible for reimbursement.
4. Appendix E of the Title VI Assurances (US DOT Order 1050.2A) During the performance of this agreement, the ADMINISTERING AGENCY, ADMINISTERING AGENCY'S contractors and subcontractor, (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees to comply with the following nondiscrimination statutes and authorities; including but not limited to:
Pertinent Nondiscrimination Authorities:
A. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin); and 49 CFR Part 21.
B. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects); C. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex);
D. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability); and 49 CFR Part 27; E. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
F. Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, (49 U.S.C. 4 71, Section 4 7123), as amended, (prohibits discrimination based on race, creed, color, national origin, or sex); G. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (PL 100-209), (Broadened the scope, coverage and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms "programs or
activities" to include all of the programs or activities of the Federal-aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federally funded or not);
H. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 8 of 9
148
SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS
03-BUT-0-PRDS
CML-5425(043)
testing entities (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) as implemented by Department of Transportation regulations at 49 C.F.R. parts 37 and 38;
I. The Federal Aviation Administration's Nondiscrimination statute (49 U.S.C. 47123) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and sex); J. Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, and resulting agency guidance, national origin discrimination includes discrimination because of limited English proficiency (LEP). To ensure compliance with Title VI, you must take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to your programs (70 Fed. Reg. at 74087 to 74100);
K. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, which prohibits you from discriminating because of sex in education programs or activities (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq).
Program Supplement 03-5425F15-F020-R2- Page 9 of 9
149
1 TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE
AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE OR THEIR DESIGNEE TO SIGN THE REVISED PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO.
F020 REV. 2 TO THE ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT FOR FEDERAL-AID PROJECTS, AGREEMENT NO. 03-5425F15 FOR THE GO PARADISE: NEAL GATEWAY PROJECT - CML 5425(043)
WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise has received federal funds for the Go Paradise: Neal Gateway Project and has entered into an Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects with the California Department of Transportation; and, WHEREAS, the State of California through its Department of Transportation (Caltrans) administers the Active Transportation and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) programs and selects projects for funding; and,
WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise was awarded Active Transportation and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) Program funds which have been allocated to this project; and,
WHEREAS, Caltrans provides Program Supplement Agreements in accordance with Administering Agency-State Agreement for Federal-Aid Projects, Agreement No. 03- 5425F15 (Master Agreement), which upon full execution enables the Town of Paradise to request and receive Federal funds; and,
WHEREAS, Caltrans requires the Town of Paradise to execute the revised Program Supplement Agreements No. F020 Rev. 2 for the Active Transportation and Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) program project in order to be eligible to receive Federal-Aid for eligible project costs; and,
WHEREAS, these funds will require that they are managed in accordance with the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual; and,
WHEREAS, the Town Council of the Town of Paradise has approved and agreed to this Revised Program Supplement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise as follows:
Section 1. That the Town Manager of the Town of Paradise, or their designee, is hereby authorized to sign said Agreement on behalf of the Town.
Section 2. The Town Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution.
150
2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise on this 14th day of October 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
By:
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
151
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 2(g)
ORIGINATED BY: Sarah Richter, Housing Program Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic
Development Director
Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution to submit HOME Program Income Application
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2025- “A resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise to submit a main and sub HOME Investment Partnerships Program Income only applications to the California State Department of Housing and Community Development in order to commit HOME Program Income funds to eligible HOME program activities, and if approved, to execute a standard agreement, any amendments thereto and of any related documents necessary to participate in the home program.”
Background:
The Town of Paradise Housing Department has operated First-Time Homebuyer and OwnerOccupied Rehabilitation programs for many years with funding from HCD’s HOME Investment Partnerships Program. When a household that was loaned HOME funds repays the loan, the repaid funds become Recaptured Funds or Program Income (both are also referred to as PI) which are held in a local account and are to be committed for reuse within 24 months. In order to meet HUD’s definition of committed, HCD requires the Town of Paradise to submit an application and create a legally binding agreement to reuse the PI funds held in the local account for in specific eligible HOME program activities.
Analysis:
The Town of Paradise submitted an application to HCD for HOME funds for an Infill New Construction for First-Time Homebuyers program in 2022. In that application, PI was identified as the primary source of funds for the program. The Housing Department also has successfully operated an owner-occupied rehabilitation and down payment assistance program for first-time homebuyers.
It is the recommendation of Housing staff that the Town Council authorize submission of the HOME PI application to HCD so the Housing Department can use the HOME PI funds to continue to operate successful housing assistance programs and in order to implement the Infill New Construction for First-Time Homebuyers program.
HCD, like most grantors, requires that the Town draw from PI funds in the Town’s local account 152
prior to accessing any active grant funds, and limits the amount of funding that can be requested on subsequent grant applications until at least 75% of currently available funding has been spent.
HOME PI funds can only be reused for approved HOME programs, and if not committed within the prescribed timeframe, can be clawed back by HCD or HUD.
Financial Impact:
The Town of Paradise currently has approximately $2.5 million in HOME PI funds, and anticipates an additional $250,000 in payoffs over the next 5-years. When the available PI funds have been spent, the Town can access the awarded funds for the HOME Infill grant of $700,000, and can apply for additional grants without being subject the funding request cap.
Failure to submit the HOME PI application will likely result in having the HOME PI clawed back by HCD or prevent the Town from drawing the $700,000 in HOME grant funds for the Infill New Construction program.
153
TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE TO
SUBMIT A MAIN AND SUB HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM
INCOME ONLY APPLICATIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO COMMIT HOME
PROGRAM INCOME FUNDS TO ELIGIBLE HOME PROGRAM ACTIVITIES, AND IF
APPROVED, TO EXECUTE A STANDARD AGREEMENT, ANY AMENDMENTS
THERETO AND OF ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HOME PROGRAM.
WHEREAS:
A. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”) is authorized to allocate HOME Investment Partnerships Program (“HOME”) funds made available from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). HOME funds are to be used for the purposes set forth in Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990, in federal implementing regulations set forth in Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 92, and in Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations commencing with section 8200.
B. On March 27, 2025, the Department issued an application for HOME Program Activities MAIN PI-only FY 2025, and in response, the Town of Paradise, a municipal corporation, wishes to apply to the Department, to commit HOME Program Income funds to eligible HOME program activities.
IT IS NOW THEREFORE RESOLVED THAT:
1. In response to the above-referenced HOME application, the Applicant shall submit an Main Application and Sub Applications for each program activity to the Department to participate in the HOME program and for a commitment of Program Income and Recaptured Funds not to exceed Two Million Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($2,750,000.00) for the following activities and/or programs:
Infill New Construction for First-Time Homebuyers ($1,700,000) Acquisition only for First-Time Homebuyers ($500,000)
Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation ($500,000)
Program Administration ($50,000)
to be located in the Town of Paradise.
2. If the Application for funding is approved, then the Applicant hereby agrees to use the HOME funds for eligible activities in the manner presented in its Application as approved by the Department in accordance with the statutes and 154
HOME Authorizing Resolution Instructions and Template for Counties effective 2/19/2025 regulations cited above. The Applicant will also execute a Standard Agreement with the Department, any amendments thereto, and any and all other documents or instruments necessary or required by the Department or HUD for participation in the HOME program.
3. The Applicant hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor or Town Manager to execute, in the name of the Applicant, the HOME Standard Agreement, other HOME-related contracts and conveyances, and any subsequent amendments thereto.
4. The Applicant hereby authorizes the Mayor, the Town Manager, or their designee, to execute, in the name of the Applicant, drawdown requests and any other HOME Program form requiring a signature, as may be required by the Department from time to time.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the TOWN COUNCIL of the TOWN OF PARADISE this 14th day of October 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:_____ NAYS:_________ ABSTAIN:_______ ABSENT:________
CERTIFICATION OF ATTESTING OFFICER
The undersigned Town Clerk of the Applicant does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a Resolution of the governing board of the Applicant passed and adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date set forth above, and said Resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed and is in full force and effect. ____________________ _________________________ ______________ Name Signature Date
155
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 2(h)
ORIGINATED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery & Economic Development Director
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: HQE Systems Contract Extension
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes, Emergency Warning System
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Concur with staff’s recommendation to extend the HQE Systems contract for construction of the town Emergency Warning Sirens to January 15, 2026; and,
2. Approve the sixth amendment to the Agreement between Town of Paradise and HQE Systems; and,
3. Authorize the Town Manager to execute the contract extension.
Background:
The Town of Paradise has been working in partnership with HQE Systems since August 2022 on the construction of the Town Early Warning Siren System. The project broke ground in March 2023 and has been testing active towers since June 2023. As of October 2025, the following milestones have been achieved:
Completed Items:
1. All 21 towers are 100% complete, fully connected to power and being tested on a monthly basis.
2. The control interface has been customized to Town specifications as requested by our Emergency Operations team and is now complete.
3. Town Dispatch staff have ongoing training and have been operating the system for the monthly tests since late 2024.
4. The system as originally scoped is fully functional.
Incomplete items:
1. In Home Units
a. The in-home units added to the project in Spring 2024 initially suffered from supply chain issues that caused a delay in receiving the initial units for testing. Units have been undergoing testing, range confirmation and configuration for the many months to make sure they are ready for distribution to the public. HQE and Town staff wanted to make sure they were fully functioning per specifications before providing them to households. In-Home unit registration began in September 2025. 156
Approximately 250 residents have so far requested a unit from the available 900 units which will begin being delivered this month. b. Additional funding has been approved for approximately 2000 more units.
The units under the new grant would return to Town Council as a new contract in 2026. The existing HQE contract will end in January as we close out the current FEMA/CalOES HMGP grant.
Analysis:
HQE have been effective partners in the construction of the Emergency Warning Sirens and we look forward to the completion of the project in the coming months. The original services contract was from July 5, 2022 and we are asking for an extension to January 15, 2026 to allow for final distribution of in-home units and the completion of the project. We are currently on track to close out the project with CalOES and FEMA in January 2026.
Financial Impact:
There is no additional financial impact to the approved project budget. Overall, the project remains under budget.
157
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE TOWN OF PARADISE AND HQE SYSTEMS
This Amendment to Agreement is made on October 14, 2025, to the Agreement dated July 5, 2022 by and between the Town of Paradise, a California Municipal Corporation (“Town”) and HQE SYSTEMS (“Contractor”)
RECITALS:
A. The initial period of the agreement was from July 5, 2022 and ending on June 30, 2023 for the construction of the Town of Paradise Early Warning System.
B. In July 2023, Town and Contractor agreed to amend the agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2023.
C. In December 2023, Town and Contractor have agreed to amend the agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on June 30, 2024.
D. In June 2024, Town and Contractor have agreed to amend the agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on December 8, 2024.
E. In December 2024, Town and Contractor have agreed to amend the agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on June 30, 2025.
F. In June 2025, Town and Contractor have agreed to amend the agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on October 31, 2025.
G. In October 2025, Town and Contractor have agreed to amend the agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on January 15, 2026.
AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, Town and Contractor agree as follows:
3. The Agreement shall be amended as follows:
4. Town and Contractor have agreed to amend the Agreement so that the period of service will be from July 5, 2022 and ending on January 15, 2026.
5. All other provisions of the agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
6. If there is a conflict between this second Amendment and the agreement, this second Amendment shall be controlling.
TOWN OF PARADISE HQE SYSTEMS
By: __________________________ By:
Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
Date: Date:
REVIEWED FOR CONTRACT POLICY COMPLIANCE REVIEWED AS TO FORM:
By: ____________________________ By:
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
ATTEST:
BY: ______________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
158
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 5(a)
ORIGINATED BY: Sarah Richter, Housing Program Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic
Development Director
Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Public Hearing – 2024-2025 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report for the Community
Development Block Grant Program
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Conduct a public hearing to receive comment on the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program.
2. Authorize the Town Manager to submit the CAPER to the Department of Housing and Urban Development with any public comments received; OR
3. Provide alternative direction. (ROLL CALL VOTE)
Background:
At the conclusion of each program year, the regulations that govern the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program require the preparation of the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The CAPER outlines CDBG program accomplishments and expenditures, as well as providing an evaluation of the town’s progress toward meeting its community development goals and objectives.
Analysis:
For the 2024-2025 Program year, the Town of Paradise was allocated $52,474 for programs and projects that directly benefit the town’s low and moderate-income residents. This is half of what the Town was anticipating, and the drastic cut is likely due to a delayed recognition of the Town’s population decrease from the Camp Fire. In addition, the Town had available $23,027.45 in loan payoffs, and $90,410.28 in unspent funds from prior grant years. Funding priorities for this program year included:
• Public Services (15%)
• Small Business Assistance (65%)
• Grant Administration (20%)
The Town made grants to two organizations through our Community Partnership program, funding public services. Chico Meal on Wheels program delivered 791 meals to 19 senior or disabled households throughout the program year expending $5,299 of CDBG funds. Boys & 159
Girls Club of the North Valley was given $5,299 in grant funding to hire 4 staff members to staff the Teen Center, where 95 local teens were served.
The remaining 65% of funding was intended to be used for small business assistance. Because the year’s allocation was so much smaller than expected, alternative ways to meet this goal were sought out, and Housing staff learned that funds could be granted to a small business performing a public service if the small business was a Community Based Development Organization. HUD needed to make the determination if a local small business was a Community Based Development Organization, and unfortunately, the disruptions in the federal administration made this a low-priority and no determination after 9 months, and it was too late to spend the funds for this goal.
Lastly, the Town expended $15,099.80 of its annual allocation on grant administration, which this year included drafting and publishing the 5-year Consolidated Plan and Annual Plan.
Unspent funds had been planned to support the HOME Infill program, which finally received a signed standard agreement in March of 2025, after initially being awarded in 2022. The CDBG funds are needed to leverage $2 million in HOME program income funds, plus an additional $700,000 in HOME grant funds. However, the HOME Infill program continues to make slow progress, and HUD will not allow the Town to continue to wait to start spending funds. A substantial amendment is planned to reprogram prior year unspent funds for a more immediate use.
A copy of the draft CAPER is attached for your review and approval. Any comments received during the hearing will be incorporated into the final document prior to its submittal to HUD regional office.
Financial Impact:
The completion of the report does not require an additional expenditure. Staff time has been covered by Community Development Block Grant Program funds thus far. However, failure to complete the report could jeopardize future CDBG funding. Though the Town’s grant is the smallest in the country, the designation as a CDBG entitlement city opens the door to other funding opportunities and allocations.
160
CAPER 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes
Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.
The Town of Paradise had a challenging year - the drastic change in population from the 2018 Camp Fire was recognized by HUD and the Town's annual allocation was half of what was anticipated. The initial small business activity was scrapped and focus was turned to providing assistance to one subrecipient to fund a job training program, but HUD staff was unable to determine if the intended recipient could be considered a Community Based Development Organization before the end of the program year. Much of the Town's CDBG prior year funding was programmed to assist a state HOME Infill program that remained suspended until March of 2025. While the Town can't report completed units as accomplishments, progress was made by way finally executing the standard agreement for the state HOME Infill grant and the approval of program guidelines, completion of the 5-year Consolidated Plan, and a substantial contribution to a subrecipient for public services with CDBGCV funding.
Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.
Goal Category Source /
Amount
Indicator Unit of
Measure
Expected
–
Strategic
Plan
Actual –
Strategic
Plan
Percent
Complete
Expected
–
Program
Year
Actual –
Program
Year
Percent
Complete
1A Expand &
Improve Public
Infrastructure
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$
Public Facility or
Infrastructure
Activities other than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
5000 2000
40.00%
161
CAPER 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
2A Provide
Public Services
for LMI &
Special Needs
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$
Public service
activities other than
Low/Moderate
Income Housing
Benefit
Persons
Assisted
100 534
534.00%
239 114
47.70%
3A Increase
Affordable
Housing
Opportunity
Affordable
Housing
CDBG:
$
Homeowner Housing
Added
Household
Housing
Unit
25 0
0.00%
3A Increase
Affordable
Housing
Opportunity
Affordable
Housing
CDBG:
$
Direct Financial
Assistance to
Homebuyers
Households
Assisted
25 0
0.00%
4A Provide for
Small Business
Assistance
Non-Housing
Community
Development
CDBG:
$
Businesses assisted
Businesses
Assisted
20 0
0.00%
20 0
0.00%
Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date 162
CAPER 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.
The priorities and specific objectives were identified in the Town's 5-Year Consolidated Plan, drafted only a year after the Camp Fire when recovery needs and resident demographic information was still largely unknown. With CDBG funding, the Town of Paradise was able to complete the infill sidewalk project, provide public services to 442 people, and purchased 4 residential lots, which are long-term projects and future sites of affordable housing. Concurrently, the Town assisted 60 residents rebuild homes destroyed in the Camp Fire, and provided down payment assistance to 65 first-time home buyers, using other grant sources. The Town also financed the construction of 47 multifamily housing units with CDBG-DR funds, and funded meals for an additional 92 households with CDBG-CV funding.
The Town finally received an executed standard agreement for state HOME funding for Infill New Construction for First-Time Home Buyers, a grant initially awarded in 2022. CDBG funds were identified as leveraged funds needed to implement the HOME program. Since the standard agreement was received, program guidelines were created and approved by HCD and the Town Council.
Small business assistance was the goal with the lowest priority, and unfortunately its time came in the last year of the Consolidated Plan when the Town's entitlement was less than anticipated. Attempts were made to grant the funds to a non-profit organization for a job training program, but HUD was not able to make the determination that the organization qualified as a Community Based Development Organization before the end of the program year.
163
CAPER 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).
91.520(a)
CDBG
White 81
Black or African American 5
Asian 4
American Indian or American Native 3
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0
Total 93
Hispanic 5
Not Hispanic 109
Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative
The total number of people assisted through public services this year total 114. The majority were youth, assisted through the Teen Center. The racial and ethnic data contained herein does not include people of more than one race.
164
CAPER 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)
Identify the resources made available
Source of Funds Source Resources Made
Available
Amount Expended
During Program Year
CDBG public - federal 75,501 24,381
Table 3 - Resources Made Available
Narrative
In addition to the $52,474 available from the annual allocation, the Town received $23,027 in program income. $16,322 was expended from the entitlement grant and $8,059 was expended from the program income. An additional $76,859 was disbursed from CDBG-CV.
Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage of
Allocation
Actual Percentage of
Allocation
Narrative Description
Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative
Distributions were for services town-wide.
165
CAPER 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Leveraging
Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan.
While only administrative funds for this activity were expended in the program year, the Town received its long awaited standard agreement for a state HOME Infill for New Construction grant this spring. Prior year CDBG funds were identified as an additioanl funding source needed to create new affordable housing through the HOME Infill grant program. Guidelines were developed and approved, and it is anticipated that the Town will move forward with lot acquisitions for the HOME Infill program in the 2025-2026 program year. 166
CAPER 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)
Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Number of Non-Homeless households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Number of Special-Needs households to be
provided affordable housing units 0 0
Total 0 0
Table 5 – Number of Households
One-Year Goal Actual
Number of households supported through
Rental Assistance 0 0
Number of households supported through
The Production of New Units 0 0
Number of households supported through
Rehab of Existing Units 0 0
Number of households supported through
Acquisition of Existing Units 0 0
Total 0 0
Table 6 – Number of Households Supported
Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.
The prior year CDBG funds are programmed for the assistance of the state HOME Infill for New Construction for First-Time Home Buyers program. The grant was awarded in 2022, but subsequent suspension of HCD by HUD has meant that the program was on hold until March of this year. There is approximately $2 million in state HOME funds that can be leveraged with the inclusion of CDBG funds.
The Town also financed lot purchases for Habitat for Humanity and the North Valley Housing Trust with 167
CAPER 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
prior year funds, construction is expected later this year and next. The Town anticipates the completion of 14 new homes through a combination of these activities.
Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.
As the Town's annual allocation shrinks, it becomes increasingly difficult to find activities that have a meaningful impact, and activities that do not increase overall project costs by the inclusion of CDBG funds. Future plans will focus on activities that have a return to program income to supplement annual allocations.
Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.
Number of Households Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual
Extremely Low-income 0 0
Low-income 0 0
Moderate-income 0 0
Total 0 0
Table 7 – Number of Households Served
Narrative Information
All households assisted in with CDBG funds for housing with be at or below the 80% AMI limit. 168
CAPER 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs
The Town's Code Enforcement Department continues to make visits to residents living in temporary shelters, connecting them with resources for permanent housing. Code Enforcement Officers are accompanied by Disaster Case Managers who can connect people with wraparound services. With CDBG-DR funds from the state, the Town has completed 47 affordable multifamily units with several hundred more in construction, expected to be finished by the end of 2026.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Town of Paradise does not have its own emergency shelter nor transitional housing; instead the Town relies on the County's resources. Within the County, there is an emergency shelter and transitional housing is available. Emergency rental assistance is available to residents who continue to live on their property due to the Camp Fire through CDBG-CV funding when the alternative option to camping in an RV is a congregant shelter.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs Due to the Camp Fire disaster, the Town has a very robust Disaster Case Management (DCM) system.
Since the entire Town is within the footprint of the wildfire, all residents qualify for a case manager.
These DCMs work with households to identify long-term housing, food programs, public assistance program, behavioral health services, etc.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again
169
CAPER 10
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The Town refers people to the Housing Authority of the County of Butte which administers the County Section 8 voucher and VASH programs. Emergency rental assistance is available to residents who continue to live on their property due to the Camp Fire through CDBG-CV funding when the alternative option to camping in an RV is a congregant shelter. With the completion of the CDBG-DR funded multifamily housing units, Paradise will have more than doubled affordable rental housing options since the Camp Fire.
170
CAPER 11
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)
Actions taken to address the needs of public housing
There are no public housing units in the Town of Paradise, however, Town Housing staff does sit on the Housing Authority County of Butte board of commissioners.
Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership
The Housing Authority County of Butte has two open board commission seats specifically for tenant commissioners. The Housing Authority participates in frequent outreach through property managers to encourage participation on the board. Town Housing staff provides a free workshop to prospective home buyers every other month. Over 100 households have attended one of these workshops in the past year.
Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs
Town of Paradise Housing staff participated in hiring a new executive director of the Housing Authority and is a voting member of the board of commissioners.
171
CAPER 12
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)
Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) The Town of Paradise has always been and continues to be a very accessible and affordable community to build and live. The Town has no policies that prevent affordable housing. The only ordinances the Town has added over and above the California building codes is wildland urban interface (WUI) standards. The Town's fees are among the lowest in the state. The Town's growth limitations are geographic. The Town's biggest barrier to affordable housing is the lack of sewer and the overreliance on private investors to provide capital improvements. The Town of Paradise has completed a feasibility study and implementation plan for a sewer for the more densely populated areas, including many of the properties that would be suitable for multi-family developments.
Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The Town provides two housing programs for low-income households: the first to assist homeowners with repairs and reconstruction of their residence, and the second to encourage affordable home ownership. The Town has identified people who were renting homes at the time of the fire as the largest population that is ineligible for most disaster-related housing programs. The Town has completed 47 affordable rental units with CDBG-DR funding and has hundreds more under construction.
Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The Town of Paradise has few homes that did not burn down in the 2018 Camp Fire, and many of those were apartment buildings or homes built since 1978. For those few pre-1978 homes that did survive the fire, the Town offers its Owner-Occupied Housing Rehabilitation program to address lead-paint mitigation.
Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The Disaster Case Management program that came as a result of the disaster but has been a successful program that assists our poverty-level families with a multitude of services. In addition, the Town works closely with non-profit origanizations in the area to provide programs/services to to very low-, low- and moderate-income residents, including the frail and elderly, mentally disabled, physically disabled, homeless, and at-risk youth.
Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The institutional structure of the Town includes a five-member Town Council. Additionally, the Business 172
CAPER 13
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
and Housing Services staff provide the main administrative and project management duties for the CDBG entitlement. The Town works closely with non-profit organizations in the area to provide programs/services to to very low-, low- and moderate-income residents, including the frail and elderly, mentally disabled, physically disabled, homeless, and at-risk youth. The Town also focuses on collaboration with goverment agencies, community needs organizations and local businesses. Town Housing staff meet quarterly with Housing staff from other local jurisdictions to collaborate and assist each other with obstacles. The Town also has a Community Relations Committee and Housing Advisory Committee that meet quarterly to get community and stakeholder input.
Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)
The Town facilitated affordable housing projects with developers in public and private partnerships. The Town works closely with North Valley Housing Trust, Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP) and Habitat for Humanity of Butte County on self-help homeownership and reconstruction projects. The Town created a Housing Advisory Committee to bring together public and private housing stakeholders in adition to community members at-large to identify the Town's housing needs and work together to address those needs.
Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a) The Town of Paradise completed a feasibility study and implementation plan for a sewer for the more densely populated areas, including many of the properties that would be suitable for multi-family developments. Bringing sewer to the Town will increase the capacity for housing density, making it more economically feasible to build affordable multifamily housing, and should also result in increased investment from businesses, creating jobs and services. The Town of Paradise Housing staff successfully argued for a change to HCD's program policies that denied owner-occupied rehabilitation funding to mobile home park residents who could not rebuild on the same lot as their destroyed property as an action that does not affirmatively further fair housing. 173
CAPER 14
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230
Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements
The Town follows the procedures adopted in the Code of Federal Regulations, created by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Community Planning and Development that pertain to Community Development programs are contained within Part 570 for CDBG entitlement communities.
Organizations receiving CDBG funds are required to report quarterly to the Town and also provide an end of year report which is reviewed and input into IDIS for yearly accomplishments at the close of the program year. Organizations are audited and staff performs site visits on a yearly basis. Staff will monitor the organizations to make sure that HUD regulations are being met or funding is relinquished.
At the end of each funding year, staff reviews the accomplishments of community service agencies to determine their ability to serve the low/mod residents of Paradise and meet the program requirements.
The Town also follows all applicable program requirements regarding housing projects and lead-based paint standards. Housing applicants are reviewed thoroughly by staff to ensure they have met all eligibility requirements. Site inspections are utilized to ensure that the housing, whether for purchase or rehabilitation, complies with safety and health requirements of the programs. Recipients are verified annually through utility billing verification to ensure owner occupancy of the property.
Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)
Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports.
The Town follows its Citizen Participation Plan for all CDBG-related programs. A public notice is published in the local newspaper 15 days prior to the public hearings. The draft document is made available at Town Hall, the Town's Building Resiliency Center, the Butte County Public Library (Paradise Branch) and on the Town's website. All of these locations are known to be accessible to persons with disabilities, persons of low/moderate income, as well as citizens at large who may be interested in participating through public commentary. Public hearings are held for public comment and questions of draft reports. All comments received are presented to Council for consideration of adoption.
CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
174
CAPER 15
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.
The Town continues to adjust to the needs of a quickly growing population. Paradise is consistently one of the top 5 new housing producers and fastest growing city, by percentage, in the state of California.
The Town's population has more than doubled in the last 5 years, but not all of the residents are formers residents who were displaced by the Camp Fire. Many are new to the state and new to Paradise, and their demographics are not yet reflected in census survey data.
While there is emphasis on leverage funds with other funding sources, programming time sensitive CDBG funds to coordinate with other funding sources meant sacrificing timeliness in order to preserve a larger grant from the state. In the future, the Town will likely not leverage CDBG funds with other funding sources that don't also prioritize urgency.
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
No
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year. 175
CAPER 16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)
Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences.
The Town continues to adjust to the needs of a quickly growing population. Paradise is consistently one of the top 5 new housing producers and fastest growing city, by percentage, in the state of California.
The Town's population has more than doubled in the last 5 years, but not all of the residents are formers residents who were displaced by the Camp Fire. Many are new to the state and new to Paradise, and their demographics are not yet reflected in census survey data.
While there is emphasis on leverage funds with other funding sources, programming time sensitive CDBG funds to coordinate with other funding sources meant sacrificing timeliness in order to preserve a larger grant from the state. In the future, the Town will likely not leverage CDBG funds with other funding sources that don't also prioritize urgency.
Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants?
No
[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year. 176
CAPER 17
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
CR-58 – Section 3
Identify the number of individuals assisted and the types of assistance provided Total Labor Hours CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF
Total Number of Activities 0 0 0 0 0
Total Labor Hours
Total Section 3 Worker Hours
Total Targeted Section 3 Worker Hours
Table 8 – Total Labor Hours
Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program CDBG HOME ESG HOPWA HTF Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Public Housing Targeted Workers
Outreach efforts to generate job applicants who are Other Funding Targeted Workers.
Direct, on-the job training (including apprenticeships).
Indirect training such as arranging for, contracting for, or paying tuition for, off-site training.
Technical assistance to help Section 3 workers compete for jobs (e.g., resume assistance, coaching).
Outreach efforts to identify and secure bids from Section 3 business concerns.
Technical assistance to help Section 3 business concerns understand and bid on contracts.
Division of contracts into smaller jobs to facilitate participation by Section 3 business concerns.
Provided or connected residents with assistance in seeking employment including: drafting resumes,preparing for interviews, finding job opportunities, connecting residents to job placement services.
Held one or more job fairs.
Provided or connected residents with supportive services that can provide direct services or referrals.
Provided or connected residents with supportive services that provide one or more of the following: work readiness health screenings, interview clothing, uniforms, test fees, transportation.
Assisted residents with finding child care.
Assisted residents to apply for, or attend community college or a four year educational institution.
Assisted residents to apply for, or attend vocational/technical training.
Assisted residents to obtain financial literacy training and/or coaching.
Bonding assistance, guaranties, or other efforts to support viable bids from Section 3 business concerns.
Provided or connected residents with training on computer use or online technologies.
Promoting the use of a business registry designed to create opportunities for disadvantaged and small businesses.
Outreach, engagement, or referrals with the state one-stop system, as designed in Section 121(e)(2) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.
177
CAPER 18
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Other.
Table 9 – Qualitative Efforts - Number of Activities by Program Narrative
178
PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:
TIME:
PAGE: 1
15:24
09-30-25
Program Year 2024
PARADISE , CA
Metrics
Grantee
Program Year
PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES
01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT
03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL
04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS
05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
05a CURRENT YEAR SECTION 108 PROGRAM INCOME (FOR SI TYPE) 06 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE-OF-CREDIT
06a FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT
07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE
08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01-07)
PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES
09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS
14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES
15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14)
16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15)
PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD
17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS
18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI-UNIT HOUSING
19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES
20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT
21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20)
22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/LINE 11)
LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS
23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION
24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS
26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/LINE 24) PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS
27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS
31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT
33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP
35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34)
36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 31/LINE 35) PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP
37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION
38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS
41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT
43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME
44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP
45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44)
46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 41/LINE 45)
PARADISE , CA
2,024.00
90,410.48
52,474.00
0.00 0.00
23,027.45
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
165,911.93
10,598.00
0.00 10,598.00
15,099.80
0.00 0.00
25,697.80
140,214.13
0.00 0.00
10,598.00
0.00 10,598.00
100.00%
PY: PY: PY:
0.00 0.00
0.00%
10,598.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 10,598.00
52,474.00
0.00 0.00
52,474.00
20.20%
15,099.80
0.00 0.00
0.00 15,099.80
52,474.00
23,027.45
0.00 75,501.45
20.00%
179
PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Integrated Disbursement and Information System
DATE:
TIME:
PAGE: 2
15:24
09-30-25
Program Year 2024
PARADISE , CA
LINE 17 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 17 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.
LINE 18 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 18 No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data.
LINE 19 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 19 Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2024
2024
2024
Total
1 1
1 287
288
288
7020987
7020971
7051504
Public Services - Boys & Girls Club
Public Services - Meal on Wheels
Public Services - Meal on Wheels
05D
05D
05Z
05Z
05Z
LMC
Matrix Code 05D
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05Z
$5,299.00
$5,299.00
$3,982.38
$1,316.62
$5,299.00
$10,598.00
LINE 27 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 27 Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number
Activity to
prevent,
prepare for,
and respond
to
Coronavirus
Activity Name Grant Number Fund
Type
Matrix
Code
National
Objective
Drawn Amount
2024
2024
2024
2024
2024
Total
1 1
1 1
1 287
287
288
288
288
7020987
7020987
7020971
7020971
7051504
No
No
No
No
No
No
Public Services - Boys & Girls Club
Public Services - Boys & Girls Club
Public Services - Meal on Wheels
Public Services - Meal on Wheels
Public Services - Meal on Wheels
Activity to prevent, prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus B24MC060051
B24MC060051
B24MC060051
B24MC060051
B24MC060051
EN
PI
EN
PI
EN
05D
05D
05D
05Z
05Z
05Z
05Z
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05D
LMC
LMC
LMC
Matrix Code 05Z
$4,608.26
$690.74
$5,299.00
$1,219.01
$2,763.37
$1,316.62
$5,299.00
$10,598.00
$10,598.00
LINE 37 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 37 Plan
Year
IDIS
Project
IDIS
Activity
Voucher
Number Activity Name MatrixCode
National
Objective Drawn Amount
2024
Total
2 290 7020987 Program Administration 21A
21A Matrix Code 21A
$15,099.80
$15,099.80
$15,099.80
180
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 5(b)
ORIGINATED BY: Sarah Richter, Housing Program Coordinator REVIEWED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic
Development Director
Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for a Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Annual Plans for the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Conduct a public hearing to solicit comments regarding a proposed Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Plans; and
2. Adopt the Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Annual Plans; and
3. Authorize staff to submit the Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Annual Plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, including any comments received during the 30-day public comment period. (ROLL CALL VOTE)
Background:
The Town of Paradise has been a U.S. Department of Housing and Development (HUD) entitlement city since 1994. HUD awards grants to entitlement community grantees to carry out a wide range of community development activities directed toward revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development, and providing improved community facilities and services. "Timely performance" means compliance with the requirement that a CDBG Entitlement grantee must carry out its program in a timely manner, as measured by the rate of expenditure of funds from the grantee's Line of Credit (LOC). A CDBG Entitlement grantee, in accordance with the CDBG regulations at 24 CFR 570.902, must have a balance no greater than one and one-half (1.5) times its annual grant remaining in the Line of Credit, 60 days prior to the end of the program year. HUD has a longstanding policy of reducing the next year's grant allocation of a grantee that continues to be untimely.
According to federal regulations and the Town of Paradise Citizen Participation Plan, any changes to an adopted CDBG budget that amounts to more than 25% of the annual allocation, and/or a cancellation or addition of a new project/activity, requires: (a) public notification for solicitation of comments, (b) a public hearing, and (c) Town Council approval. The amendment is then submitted to HUD for acceptance.
181
Analysis:
The Town of Paradise is “untimely,” and needs to spend down unspent CDBG grant funds before the end of the fiscal year in June. One reason for this untimeliness was a 2024 allocation of only $52,474, which was half of what the Town was expecting and had received in several prior years, and made the 1.5x formula much more difficult to comply with. In order to avoid untimeliness for a second year in a row, Housing Staff recommends reallocating $70,000 in funds that were planned for other activities into an activity that can be completed by June of next year.
The 2020 funds are leftover funds from the Sidewalk Infill project ($11,575), 2022 funds are allocated to support the HOME Infill program ($13,282), 2023 funds are allocated for lot acquisition to increase affordable housing ($65,553), plus Program Income from loan payoffs, which always needs to be spent first ($14,968). Housing staff proposes to reallocate the Program Income, 2020, and 2022 unspent funds in their entirety, and the $30,175 from the 2023 funds to an energy efficiency improvement activity.
Program Year Amount to move to new activity
Program Income $14,968
2020 $11,575
2022 $13,282
2023 $30,175
Total $70,000
The new activity, an Energy Efficiency Improvement program, will allow the Town to assist lowincome homeowners with energy improvements to their homes, even when the homes don’t need any other repairs (a difference from other Town of Paradise Housing programs). These improvements are intended to increase the energy efficiency of existing homes in order to keep utility bills affordable for low-income homeowners. Energy efficiency improvements include things like increased insulation, replacement or conversion of heating and cooling systems, and the addition of solar energy systems.
In addition to today’s public hearing, the public is invited to submit public comments from 10/14/2025 to 11/14/2025. Written comments can be emailed to [email protected] or mailed to Town of Paradise, Attn: Housing, 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA 95969. For verbal comments or for more information, the public can call (530) 872-6291 x122.
Financial Impact:
The impact of this amendment will allocate $70,000 in CDBG funds from previously planned housing activities to another eligible housing activity. 182
Town of Paradise
Substantial Amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 Annual Plans Jurisdiction:
Town of Paradise
www.townofparadise.com
CDBG Contact Person:
Sarah Richter
Town of Paradise
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
Phone: (530) 872-6291 x 122
Email: [email protected]
According to federal regulations and the Town of Paradise Citizen Participation Plan, any changes to an adopted CDBG budget that amounts to more than 25% of the annual allocation, and/or a cancellation or addition of a new project/activity, requires: (a) public notification for solicitation of comments, (b) a public hearing, and (c) Town Council approval. The amendment is then submitted to HUD for acceptance.
The following amendment to the 2020, 2022, and 2023 CDBG Annual Plans are proposed for Council Consideration:
The Town of Paradise has unspent CDBG funds from prior program years that can be reallocated to other CDBG eligible activities. The 2020 funds are leftover funds from the Sidewalk Infill project ($11,575), 2022 funds are allocated to support the HOME Infill program ($13,282), 2023 funds are allocated for lot acquisition to increase affordable housing ($65,553). The Town of Paradise also has Program Income ($14,968) from loan payoffs, which needs to be drawn prior to grant funds. Housing staff proposes to reallocate current Program Income, 2020, and 2022 unspent funds in their entirety, and the $30,175 from the 2023 funds to an energy efficiency improvement activity. 183
Program Year Amount to move to new
activity
Program Income $14,968
2020 $11,575
2022 $13,282
2023 $30,175
Total $70,000
The new activity, an Energy Efficiency Improvement program, will allow the Town to assist low-income homeowners with energy improvements to their homes, even when the homes don’t need any other repairs (a difference from other Town of Paradise Housing programs). These improvements are intended to increase the energy efficiency of existing homes in order to keep utility bills affordable for low-income homeowners.
Energy efficiency improvements include things like increased insulation, replacement or conversion of heating and cooling systems, and the addition of solar energy systems. 184
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 5(c)
ORIGINATED BY: Susan Hartman, Community Development Director – Planning & Wastewater
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
Scott Huber, Town Attorney
SUBJECT: Public Hearing: Planning Commission Recommendation for Town Council Adoption of a Paradise General Plan Land
Use Map Amendment and Property Rezone for an
Application Identified as Mahoney Capital LP: PL25-00056
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
N/A
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Conduct duly noticed public hearing; and,
2. Concur with the project “CEQA determination” finding embodied within Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-07; and,
3. Concur with the project recommended General Plan Land Use Map amendment and rezone action adopted by the Planning Commission on September 16, 2025, and embodied within Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-07; and,
4. Adopt Town of Paradise Resolution No. 2025-_______, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Amending the Land Use Map of the 1994 Paradise General Plan (Mahoney Capital LP: PL25-00056)”
5. Waive the first reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. ____ and read by title only; and,
6. Introduce Town of Paradise Ordinance No. _____ “An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Real Property From “TR-1/2” (Town Residential 1/2-acre minimum) to the “M-F” (Multiple-Family Residential) Zone Pursuant to Paradise Municipal Code Sections
17.45.500 Et. Seq. (Mahoney Capital LP: PL25-00056)”; or,
7. Adopt an alternative directive to town staff.
Background:
The permit applicant, Mahoney Capital LP, is requesting approval of a General Plan amendment and rezone from the Town of Paradise to provide a multi-family development consisting of six duplexes with two (2) bedrooms per unit on a 2.6-ac property located at 8822 Skyway. As proposed, the property would be rezoned from Town Residential 1/2-minimum (TR-1/2) to Multiple-Family Residence (M-F) and the General Plan land use designation changed from Town Residential (TR) to Multi-Family Residential (MF). The property is currently undeveloped after being burned in the 2018 Camp Fire. Previously, the site contained two single-family dwellings with one of those being demolished in 2015.
As proposed, the multi-family development will be accessed from Skyway through a new driveway encroachment connecting to a new interior asphalt paved roadway built to the Town’s A-2A private road standard which will terminate into a hammerhead turn-around allowing adequate 185
emergency response access. The existing septic system will be abandoned and replaced with a single 8,000-gallon septic tank and community sand filter as part of the project.
The multi-family development project includes a walking loop at the rear of the property, within the dense canopy of surviving trees, that will connect to a man gate allowing direct access to the adjacent public trailway.
Surrounding land uses include six (6) abutting residential sites to the south with a church property and mobile home park further south, vacant residential property to the north that is entitled for multi-family development, and the Yellowstone Kelly Heritage Trail along the southeast property line.
Analysis:
The proposed use of land is appropriate for the multi-family zoning district due to its compatibility with the existing neighborhood which includes medium density single-family homes and a mobile home park to the south as well as the vacant parcel to the north which was previously developed with multi-family. The general plan amendment and rezone will support the Town’s assigned Regional Housing Needs Allocation for the 2022-2030 planning period in the “moderate” and “above-moderate” housing categories as these duplexes are not proposed to be low-income housing units. The project has received favorable responses from the commenting agencies and is a reasonable request.
This project can be found exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code Section 21080.85 where it has been determined that the rezoning implements a schedule of actions contained within an approved General Plan Housing Element.
Implementation Measure HI-24 of the Town’s Housing Element calls for rezoning within the Sewer Service Area for increased density, which is where this project is located.
The attached Planning Commission resolution document recommends Town Council adoption and assignment of a specific Paradise General Plan land use designation and rezone of certain real property. Attached with this agenda summary for consideration, possible adoption, and introduction respectively by the Town Council, are copies of a proposed Town of Paradise resolution document and a zoning ordinance document, both of which reflect the Planning Commission’s recommended actions.
Lastly, for your convenience, town planning staff have also generated and attached other information materials related to this agenda item.
Financial Impact:
The Town incurs no direct costs for the General Plan amendment and first reading and introduction of the zoning ordinance for the rezone. The digital land use and zoning maps are maintained and updated by the Chico State GIC under an existing contract.
Attachments
186
ATTACHEMENTS FOR
MAHONEY CAPITAL LP: PL25-00056 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT/REZONE
1. Project vicinity map.
2. Notice sent to surrounding property owners and the Paradise Post for the October 14, 2025 public hearing.
3. Mailing list of property owners and agencies notified of the public hearing.
4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-07 adopted September 16, 2025.
5. Town of Paradise Resolution No. 2025-____, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Amending the Land Use Map of the 1994 Paradise General Plan (Mahoney Capital LP: PL25-00056)”.
6. Town of Paradise Ordinance No. ____, “An Ordinance Rezoning Certain Real Property From “TR-1/2” (Town Residential 1/2-acre minimum) to the “M-F” (Multiple-Family Residential) Zone Pursuant to Paradise Municipal Code Sections 17.45.500 Et. Seq. (Mahoney Capital LP:
PL25-00056)”.
187
188
189
190
191
192
TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-___
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP OF THE 1994 PARADISE GENERAL PLAN (MAHONEY CAPITAL LP: PL25-00056)
WHEREAS, the Paradise Planning Commission and the Paradise Town Council have conducted public hearings, pursuant to California planning and zoning law concerning a proposed amendment to the land use map of the 1994 Paradise General Plan; and
WHEREAS, such public hearings also included review of potential environmental impacts associated with the amendment to the Paradise General Plan, pursuant to requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and WHEREAS, Section 65358 of the California Government Code allows a legislative body to amend its General Plan, and
WHEREAS, the action of the Town Council follows the requirements of Government Code Sections 65353, 65354, 65854 and 65090; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has considered the analysis and recommendation of the Community Development Department; has received and considered the recommendations of the Planning Commission via adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-07; and has considered the comments made at public hearings conducted by the Planning Commission and the Town Council; and on the basis thereof has determined pursuant to Section 65358 of the Government Code that a certain amendment of the 1994 Paradise General Plan Land Use Map is in the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the Paradise Planning Commission and the Town Council have determined that the proposed General Plan (land use map) amendment and rezone project is appropriate and reasonable because it would result in the assignment of general plan land use and zoning designations to the affected property that are appropriate and reasonable in a manner that a) promotes the objectives of the Town’s Housing Element, b) is compatible with surrounding land uses and zoning therefore is consistent with applicable 1994 Paradise General Plan policies, and, c) will result in additional housing units to support the Town’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).
193
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise as follows:
Section 1. The Town Council hereby finds that the requested actions are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.85 in that the rezoning implements a schedule of actions contained within an approved General Plan Housing Element.
Section 2. The Town Council hereby adopts this amendment to the 1994 Paradise General Plan known as PL25-00056, assigning a Multi-Family Residential (MF) General Plan land use map designation for a +/-2.6-acre land area located at 8822 Skyway in Paradise and further identified as AP No. 050-070- 019, as described in Exhibit “A” and shown in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise this 14th day of October 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
___________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:_____________________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk/Elections Official
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:_____________________________________
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
194
Exhibit “A”
General Plan Amendment
Mahoney Capital LP
195
Exhibit “B”
General Plan Amendment
Mahoney Capital LP
196
TOWN OF PARADISE
ORDINANCE NO. ____
AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FROM “TR-1/2” (TOWN RESIDENTIAL 1/2-ACRE MINIMUM) TO AN “M-F” (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE PURSUANT TO PARADISE MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 17.45.500 ET. SEQ. (MAHONEY CAPITAL LP: PL25-00056)
The Town Council of the Town of Paradise, State of California, does hereby ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The hereinafter described portion of real property situated in the Town of Paradise, State of California, shall be and is hereby zoned “M-F” (Multiple-Family Residential) as described in Chapter 17.17 of the Paradise Municipal Code and such land area shall be subject to the restrictions, restricted uses, and regulations of such chapter. The portion of real property so zoned is located at 8822 Skyway in the Town of Paradise, identified as AP No. 050- 070-019, and as described in Exhibit “A” and shown in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days beyond the date of its passage.
Before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage, this ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation and circulated within the Town of Paradise along with the names of the members of the Town Council of Paradise voting for and against same.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise, County of Butte, State of California, on this ____ day of , 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
NOT VOTING:
____________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:_________________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk/Elections Official
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:_________________________________
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
197
Exhibit “A”
Rezone
Mahoney Capital LP
198
Exhibit “B”
Rezone
Mahoney Capital LP
199
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 6(a)
ORIGINATED BY: Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk/Elections Official REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Consider a timeline and appointment of a Measure V Oversight Committee Members
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Consider approving the Notice of Vacancy created by a Committee Member’s resignation; and,
2. Approve the Measure V application and authorize staff to advertise the Measure V Committee vacancy; and,
3. Designate two Town Council Members to serve on an interview panel for the Measure V interview process; and,
4. Schedule appointment to the vacancy at the December 9, 2025 Regular Town Council meeting with appointment to become effective immediately. (ROLL CALL VOTE) Background:
On November 6, 2018, the citizens of Paradise approved Measure V, the extension of the 0.05 percent sales tax increase that will be in effect for 10 years beginning April 1, 2021, and ending March 31, 2031.
There is currently one vacancy on the Measure V Committee created by the resignation of Linda Dye.
Analysis:
According to Town Council Resolution No. 21-12, the adopted by-laws for the Measure V Oversight Committee, vacancies are to be filled as follows:
“When a seat of the Measure V-Citizen Oversight Committee becomes vacant, Town staff will inform the Town Council and schedule appointment to the vacancy at a regular or special meeting.
Such appointments are to take place within 60 days of the creation of the vacancy.” The Town Council generally appoints citizens to vacancies of boards and commission by authorizing recruitment by application and scheduling appointments at a regular meeting. In the past, the Town Council utilized an interview process where two Council Members served as an interview panel and made recommendations for appointments to the Council. Staff recommends this same process in anticipation of the Measure V Citizen Oversight Committee vacancy. Upon approval, staff would advertise the Measure V Committee vacancy by legal notice, posting on the Town’s website, Facebook page and a media release; set an application deadline of November 6, 2025 at 5:00 p.m.; and, assist the interview panel by providing suggested questions and a scoring matrix for candidates and coordinating interviews.
Financial Impact:
Financial impact to the general fund is minimal with only the cost of the legal notice to be incurred. 200
TOWN OF PARADISE
NOTICE OF VACANCY ON THE MEASURE V CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Paradise Town Council of one position on the Town of Paradise Measure V Citizen Oversight Committee as vacant, created by a resignation of a Board Member. Any registered voter of the Town of Paradise is eligible to apply and may obtain an application at the Town Hall located at 5555 Skyway, Paradise, California, Monday-Thursday from 8:00 am - 5:00 pm or from the Town’s internet website at www.townofparadise.com. The Town Clerk must receive the application by 5 pm on November 6, 2025. Interview dates to be determined. The successful applicant will be appointed at the December 9, 2025 Regular Town Council meeting and will be required to disclose certain financial interests within the Fair Political Practices Commission and file a California Form 700, Statement of Economic Interest.
The Measure V Citizen Oversight Committee is established by ordinance to serve as an advisory board to the Paradise Town Council and hold quarterly meetings at Town Hall located at 5555 Skyway. See Paradise Municipal Code Sections 3.22.070 through 3.22.130 available on the Town’s website at www.townofparadise.com. For further information call the Town Clerk’s Department at 530-872-6291 x 101.
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
201
Town of Paradise
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
(530) 872-6291
Working together to rebuild a thriving community.
TOWN OF PARADISE
MEASURE V CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE APPLICATION
The Town Council is seeking applicants to serve on a nine-member Measure “V” Citizen Oversight Committee. This committee will meet at least quarterly with the Town Manager and the Town Finance Director to review the proposed annual budget and to make recommendations relating to the proceeds of the “Measure V” funds, the temporary ½ cent sales tax that will automatically expire in 2031.
Applicants shall be full-time residents and registered voters in the Town of Paradise. Successful applicants will be required to file a California Form 700 Statement of Economic Interest financial disclosure, a public document that informs the public of financial interests within the Town of Paradise jurisdiction.
APPLICATION DEADLINE: November 6, 2025, by 5:00 p.m. Submit applications to the Town Clerk Department at 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA 95969 or by email at [email protected].
Interview times to be determined.
APPLICANT DETAILS
Full Name: _______________________________________________________________________ Phone Number: ___________________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________________________________________ I am 18 years of age or older: Yes No
Can you attend day meetings? Yes No
Are you a registered voter in the Town of Paradise? Yes No How long have you lived in Paradise? __________________________________________________ Occupation: ______________________________________________________________________ Availability Details: _________________________________________________________________ Education and Experience: __________________________________________________________ 202
Town of Paradise
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
(530) 872-6291
Working together to rebuild a thriving community.
APPLICATION DETAILS
What qualifications, skills or experience make you a strong candidate for the Measure V Citizens Oversight Committee?
What do you believe would be your most valuable contribution as a member of the Committee? Signature: Date:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 203
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 6(b)
ORIGINATED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic
Development Director
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Memorandum of Understanding with Rebuild Paradise Foundation for Insurance Advocacy Work
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Consider authorizing the Interim Town Manager to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Rebuild Paradise Foundation for Insurance Advocacy Work; and
2. Give direction to staff to create an Insurance Committee to further Insurance Advocacy for the Town. (ROLL CALL VOTE)
Background:
Following the 2018 Camp Fire, insurance challenges quickly emerged as one of the most significant barriers to recovery. Many residents faced underinsurance, non-renewals, or unaffordable premium increases, limiting their ability to rebuild. The Town of Paradise has worked to support residents through coordination with United Policyholders, participation in California Department of Insurance (CDI) efforts, and direct advocacy to state and federal partners. Despite this, insurance remains one of the top concerns expressed by community members.
The Rebuild Paradise Foundation has developed specialized expertise in insurance issues, maintaining strong connections with partners such as United Policyholders, the Department of Insurance, and most importantly, insurance companies. Town staff had preliminary discussions with Rebuild Paradise Foundation in the Spring of 2025 to discuss a possible partnership in which the Town would fund insurance advocacy efforts undertaken by Rebuild Paradise Foundation. At Council’s direction, staff worked with Rebuild Paradise Foundation on an MOU to outline this partnership and define deliverables.
Analysis:
The proposed MOU includes a scope of work for Rebuild Paradise to be undertaken for a funding allocation of $25,000 over a one year period. The scope of work is as follows:
Purpose
The Town of Paradise (“Town”) seeks to engage the Rebuild Paradise Foundation (“Contractor”) to provide insurance advocacy services that support the Town’s recovery and resilience efforts. 204
This work will strengthen community access to insurance, increase insurer confidence in the rebuilding progress of Paradise, and provide education to residents and contractors.
Compensation
The Town shall provide $25,000 in funding to the Contractor for the completion of the services and deliverables described herein.
Term
The term of this agreement shall be October 15, 2025 through October 14, 2025, unless extended or terminated in accordance with the provisions of the contract.
Scope of Services & Deliverables
The Contractor shall perform the following tasks:
1. Monthly United Policyholders (UP) Meetings
o Attend and actively participate in monthly UP meetings. o Stay informed on evolving insurance trends, tools, and homeowner support programs.
o Share key updates with Town staff and community stakeholders.
2. Annual Global Insurance Summit (California Department of Insurance-hosted) o Represent the Town of Paradise at the annual CDI Global Insurance Summit. o Gather insights on industry trends, regulatory changes, and best practices. o Build and maintain relationships with insurers and regulators relevant to wildfireimpacted communities.
3. Biannual Insurance Workshops at the Building Resiliency Center (BRC) o Plan, promote, and host two educational workshops annually. o Topics may include insurance market trends, policy requirements, strategies for improving insurability, and contractor-focused education. o Provide materials and presentations tailored to community needs.
4. Regional and State Policy Meetings
o Attend relevant regional and state meetings, such as the California Board of Forestry or other regulatory agencies influencing insurance and wildfire policies. o Advocate for policies supportive of rural and wildfire-impacted communities. o Report back on key developments to the Town.
5. Insurance Site Visits to Paradise
o Organize and host insurer visits to the community.
o Showcase defensible space, fire hardening efforts, and overall rebuilding progress.
205
o Build trust with insurers to encourage expansion of market options for residents.
6. Insurance Impact Report
o Develop and maintain a comprehensive report tracking:
Which insurers are writing policies in Paradise.
Requirements and barriers for coverage.
Data on homeowner access to insurance.
o Provide recommendations based on findings to help guide Town outreach and policy priorities.
Reporting and Communication
Contractor shall provide quarterly progress updates to the Town, including activities completed, upcoming events, and preliminary findings.
A final report summarizing outcomes and deliverables shall be submitted at the conclusion of the contract term.
Performance Measures
Completion of the deliverables listed above within the contract period. Demonstrated increase in insurer engagement and/or homeowner education opportunities.
Delivery of timely and accurate reports to the Town.
Insurance Committee
At the September 2025 Council meeting, Council directed staff to bring back information regarding the formation of a committee to further the Town’s interests regarding insurance. A committee for this purpose can be established as a Regular (or Standing) Committee or as an Ad Hoc Committee.
Regular (Standing) Committee Structure
A standing committee is a permanent body of the Town Council that meets on a recurring basis to address a defined area of policy or oversight. Standing committees are subject to Brown Act requirements, include appointed Councilmembers, and typically hold publicly noticed meetings.
This structure provides consistent oversight and accountability but requires ongoing staff resources and formalized administration.
Ad Hoc Committee Structure
An ad hoc committee is a temporary body created by the Council for a specific purpose, often with a defined scope and timeframe. Ad hoc committees are made up of two or fewer Councilmembers and are not subject to Brown Act requirements, which allows for more flexibility and efficiency. Once the assigned task or project is complete, the committee dissolves.
Recommendation
Given the evolving nature of insurance challenges and the need for focused, flexible advocacy, staff recommends the creation of an Ad Hoc Insurance Advocacy Committee. This structure 206
allows the Town to be nimble in its response, engage directly with stakeholders such as state regulators and nonprofits, and provide timely reports back to Council without the administrative burden of maintaining a standing committee.
The makeup of the committee could be as follows:
Two appointed Councilmembers (Lange and Bolin)
Representative from Rebuild Paradise Foundation
Representative from the Chamber of Commerce
Local Insurance Industry (broker or agent)
Local resident(s)
Local business owner(s)
Town Manager
Town Recovery and Economic Development Director
Financial Impact:
The financial impact for this item is $25,000 from the General Fund. This amount has been budgeted within the Recovery and Economic Development Department 2025/2026 Fiscal Year Budget.
207
1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE TOWN OF PARADISE AND REBUILD PARADISE FOUNDATION This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU” or “Agreement”) between the Town of Paradise (“Town”) and Rebuild Paradise Foundation (RPF) is made regarding funding from the Town towards insurance advocacy work to be performed by Rebuild Paradise Foundation. The parties to this agreement are sometimes referred to herein as a “Party” or collectively as “Parties.” This Agreement is made on October 15, 2025 (“Effective Date”).
WHEREAS, in the wake of the 2018 Camp Fire, insurance availability and affordability has been a major obstacle to recovery; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise has undertaken efforts to improve insurance availability and affordability through work with the California Department of Insurance as well as partnership with the Rebuild Paradise Foundation on resident education ; and WHEREAS, the Rebuild Paradise Foundation has made significant progress in brining affordable insurance to Paradise over the last year, and continues to advocate for insurance and educate residents on their options; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise wishes to financially support Rebuild Paradise Foundations efforts on insurance advocacy, in addition to their own efforts.
NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated as material terms of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein.
Section 2. The Town shall allocate $25,000 to the Rebuild Paradise Foundation.
Section 3. Funding from the Town is contingent upon completion of specific milestones outlined in the scope of work.
Section 4. Each party shall indemnify, defend, protect, hold harmless, and release the others, their officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all claims, loss, proceedings, damages, causes of action, liability, costs, or expense (including attorneys’ fees and witness costs) arising from or in connection with, or caused by any act, omission, or negligence of such indemnifying party or its agents, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or invitees.
Section 5. This agreement may not be assigned by any Party to any third party without the express written consent of the other Parties.
Section 6. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by any Party with thirty (30) days’ advance notice provided to the other Parties.
208
2 Notices to the Town shall be provided to:
Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
Town of Paradise
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
Notices to Rebuild Paradise Foundation shall be provided to:
Jen Goodlin, Executive Director
Rebuild Paradise Foundation
6067 Skyway, Suite B
Paradise, CA 95969
Section 9. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, there are no oral agreements. No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid unless in a writing signed by all Parties.
Section 10. If any provision of this agreement that is deemed by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect.
SO AGREED.
For the Town: For Rebuild Paradise Foundation:
Date: Date:
By: _________________________ By: ______________________________ Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager Jen Goodlin, Executive Director Town of Paradise Rebuild Paradise Foundation
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
209
3 Exhibit A
Scope of Services & Deliverables
The Contractor shall perform the following tasks:
1. Monthly United Policyholders (UP) Meetings
o Attend and actively participate in monthly UP meetings. o Stay informed on evolving insurance trends, tools, and homeowner support programs.
o Share key updates with Town staff and community stakeholders.
2. Annual Global Insurance Summit (California Department of Insurance-hosted) o Represent the Town of Paradise at the annual CDI Global Insurance Summit. o Gather insights on industry trends, regulatory changes, and best practices. o Build and maintain relationships with insurers and regulators relevant to wildfireimpacted communities.
3. Biannual Insurance Workshops at the Building Resiliency Center (BRC) o Plan, promote, and host two educational workshops annually. o Topics may include insurance market trends, policy requirements, strategies for improving insurability, and contractor-focused education. o Provide materials and presentations tailored to community needs.
4. Regional and State Policy Meetings
o Attend relevant regional and state meetings, such as the California Board of Forestry or other regulatory agencies influencing insurance and wildfire policies. o Advocate for policies supportive of rural and wildfire-impacted communities. o Report back on key developments to the Town.
5. Insurance Site Visits to Paradise
o Organize and host insurer visits to the community.
o Showcase defensible space, fire hardening efforts, and overall rebuilding progress.
o Build trust with insurers to encourage expansion of market options for residents. 210
4 6. Insurance Impact Report
o Develop and maintain a comprehensive report tracking:
Which insurers are writing policies in Paradise.
Requirements and barriers for coverage.
Data on homeowner access to insurance.
o Provide recommendations based on findings to help guide Town outreach and policy priorities.
Reporting and Communication
Contractor shall provide quarterly progress updates to the Town, including activities completed, upcoming events, and preliminary findings.
A final report summarizing outcomes and deliverables shall be submitted at the conclusion of the contract term.
Performance Measures
Completion of the deliverables listed above within the contract period. Demonstrated increase in insurer engagement and/or homeowner education opportunities. Delivery of timely and accurate reports to the Town.
211
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 6(c)
ORIGINATED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic Development Director
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review the Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Draft provided by Abaris Group; and,
2. Accept the Plan as a complete and Final Draft; or
3. Provide alternative direction to staff.
Background:
Following the 2018 Camp Fire, the Town of Paradise has sought to assist in the recovery of healthcare services for current and future residents. In order to determine the current inventory of services, current and future healthcare needs, best practices, and existing and projected gaps, the Town of Paradise and the Adventist Health Feather River Foundation are seeking a consulting firm to create a Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan.
At the April 2024 Council Meeting, Paradise Town Council directed staff to allocate up to $75,000 towards the cost to complete the Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan. Following that meeting, Adventist Health Feather River Foundation (a separate entity from Adventist Health) also allocated up to $75,000 towards the completion of the Plan.
In September 2024, The Town contracted with Abaris Group to prepare the Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan, with input from community stakeholders.
Analysis:
Abaris Group analyzed existing healthcare data and studies, conducted interviews with providers, and stakeholders, and considered community input regarding the current state of healthcare in the Paradise area. Abaris Group has provided a draft Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan which provides contextual information and gives recommendations to improve healthcare in our community. The full report is attached to this agenda item. The recommendations outlined in the executive summary have been included below in this agenda summary for reference:
Short Term (0-5 Years, Population up to 15,000)
212
Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Consider zoning, planning, and Town infrastructure improvements that could pave the way for a potential future hospital.
Begin the early planning process for the formation of a Healthcare District.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
In conjunction with Butte County EMS, the Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS Agency, and Adventist Health:
o Establish a mutually agreeable sustainability plan that monitors EMS volumes for the need of additional ambulance coverage.
o Encourage development of alternate destinations and assess and refer policies for low-acuity patients who can be safely cared for in the Adventist rapid care clinic or transported to a hospital via a rideshare option (see below). Consider allocating $330,000 for short-term supplemental funding to provide additional coverage in the Town of Paradise between midnight and 8 a.m. Develop rideshare options in partnership with Lyft, UBER, and public transit, for low-acuity patients who may need hospital evaluation but otherwise do not need ambulance transport.
Initiate the process of establishing a Community Service Area that can provide sustainable supplemental funding for overnight ambulance service that exceeds what can be supported by patient volume.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
The Town should continue its partnership with Adventist Health to expand capacity and hours of operation at the Skyway Adventist Health Clinic and Rapid Care by addressing barriers to expansion, such as provider recruitment and a fall-off in patient demand in the evening hours.
Amending Adventist Health’s clinic license with the California Department of Health Services would encourage it to become an urgent care center rather than a rapid care center.
Primary and Specialty Care
Reach out to healthcare organizations to solicit interest in expanding services in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
Consider incentives such as fee reductions, streamlined permits, financial support, and others toward healthcare organizations that express interest in expanding in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
213
Evaluate public transportation options and make recommendations on routes that maximize efficiency for residents who need to travel from Paradise to the healthcare facilities in Chico.
Long Term Care
Initiate zoning, planning, and permitting incentives to encourage operators to open skilled nursing, assisted living, adult day care, and respite care as local demand for these services grows.
Develop relationships with existing long-term care providers in Butte County and explore opportunities for expansion in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
Medium Term (5-10 years, Population up to 20,000)
Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Prioritize the Healthcare District planning process and initiate public education and discussion related to the formation of a district.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Work with Butte County EMS and SSVEMS to establish nurse navigation for appropriately triaged 911 callers.
Consider establishing a standby BLS ambulance service for transporting clinic patients, as necessary.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Continue to monitor rapid care utilization and consider expansion if demand dictates. Establish Adventist's willingness and capability to care for low-acuity EMS patients in Rapid Care who would otherwise not need to go to an emergency department.
Primary and Specialty Care
Provide incentives to attract and retain medical providers in the area, such as housing subsidies or loan repayment.
Continue to meet with local healthcare providers to determine other potential barriers or challenges to staff recruitment and retention.
Long Term (10-15 years, Population up to and beyond 25,000) Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Initiate the process of forming a Healthcare District by working with Butte County LAFCO and retaining the services of a specialty firm that can perform the financial analysis and feasibility review needed.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Continue monitoring EMS demand volumes and appropriate coverage. Continue 911 nurse navigation and alternate destination programs previously established. 214
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Consider expanding capacity to provide 24/7 coverage, with the capability to accept low acuity EMS patients.
Primary and Specialty Care
Partner with Healthy Rural California and academic institutions to increase training opportunities in the high schools and community colleges for allied health professionals.
Financial Impact:
The financial impact for this item is $75,000 from the General Fund. This amount has been budgeted within the Recovery and Economic Development Department 2025/2026 Fiscal Year Budget. An additional $75,000 was provided by Adventist Health Feather River Foundation. 215
David Ghilarducci, MD, FACEP, FAEMS
THE ABARIS GROUP
WWW.ABARISGROUP.COM
Strategic
Healthcare
Recovery Plan
216
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 1
Table of Contents
Executive Summary................................................................................................. 3 Introduction .....................................................................................................................3 Objective..........................................................................................................................4 Methodology....................................................................................................................4 Findings...........................................................................................................................5 Recommended Action Plan and Recovery....................................................................9 Short Term (0-5 Years, Population up to 15,000)....................................................................9 Medium Term (5-10 years, Population up to 20,000) ............................................................11 Long Term (10-15 years, Population up to and beyond 25,000)...........................................12 Conclusion.....................................................................................................................12 Section 1: Population Demographics and Health ............................................... 14 Population Characteristics ...........................................................................................14 Population Projections .................................................................................................17 School Enrollment.........................................................................................................18 Income and Economics ................................................................................................20 Health Insurance ...........................................................................................................23 Births..............................................................................................................................25 Population Health..........................................................................................................26 Section 2: HealthCare Services and Findings..................................................... 30 Hospitals and Emergency Departments ......................................................................30 Hospital and Emergency Department Findings .....................................................................36 Emergency Medical Services .......................................................................................51 EMS Findings.........................................................................................................................59 Urgent Care/Rapid Care Clinics ...................................................................................62 Urgent Care/Rapid Care Findings .........................................................................................64 Primary and Specialty Care ..........................................................................................66 Primary and Specialty Care Findings ....................................................................................75 Long Term Care Facilities.............................................................................................77 Long Term Care Facility Findings..........................................................................................78 Section 3: Recommended Action Plan for Recovery.......................................... 80 Short Term (0-5 Years, Population up to 15,000) ........................................................80 Hospital Care and Emergency Departments .........................................................................80 Pre-Hospital Care (EMS) .......................................................................................................81 Urgent Care/Rapid Care ........................................................................................................83 Primary and Specialty Care ...................................................................................................83 Long Term Care.....................................................................................................................84 Medium Term (5-10 years, Population up to 20,000)...................................................85 Hospital Care and Emergency Departments .........................................................................85 Pre-Hospital Care (EMS) .......................................................................................................85 Urgent Care/Rapid Care ........................................................................................................86 Primary and Specialty Care ...................................................................................................86 Long Term (10-15 years, Population up to and beyond 25,000).................................87 Hospital Care and Emergency Departments .........................................................................87 Pre-Hospital Care (EMS) .......................................................................................................87 Urgent Care/Rapid Care ........................................................................................................87 Primary and Specialty Care ...................................................................................................87 Section 4: Summary and Conclusions................................................................. 89 217
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 2
Appendix.................................................................................................................92 Organizations interviewed............................................................................................92 Interview Summaries ....................................................................................................93 Characteristics of Small Non-CAH Hospitals in California.........................................97 Critical Access Hospital Map .......................................................................................98 218
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 3
Executive Summary
Introduction
When dawn struck on November 8, 2018, due to extraordinarily dry conditions and unusual wind patterns, a “fast fire” initiated by failed electrical transmission lines sparked a conflagration that would become one of the deadliest and most expensive fires in California history. Within just a few short hours, the bucolic Town of Paradise and surrounding communities on the Upper Ridge were consumed by a firestorm that left 85 dead and destroyed nearly 19,531 homes (90% of housing stock) and structures, which permanently changed the community.
1,2
For many years preceding the Camp Fire, people living in the Town of Paradise and the Upper Ridge communities of Magalia and Stirling City enjoyed a peaceful, rural, and semi-rural life away from the hustle and bustle of urban areas. More affordable than many other areas of California, the ridge attracted retirees, families, and others, and eventually grew to a collective peak population of over 50,000 people.
The Feather River Hospital (FRH), founded in the 1960s, was a particular anchor to the community. It was known for excellent labor and delivery, a fully functioning emergency department (ED), cancer care, and surgical specialties. The hospital supported associated outpatient medical providers and clinics that offered a full spectrum of primary care to community members.
The economic impact of the hospital’s closure is significant. The hospital has remained closed due in part to damage sustained in the fire and following rainstorms. This left nearly all hospital employees out of work, and many of the associated outpatient physicians, healthcare workers, and clinics have either closed,
1 https://www.nist.gov/el/fire
2 https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2018/11/8/camp-fire/ 219
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 4
relocated to the Chico area, or even moved out of state, thus leaving the ridge and Upper Ridge with much-diminished access to healthcare as compared to before the fire.
3 Many new and returning residents now rely on healthcare in Chico and the few remaining clinics in Paradise.
Objective
In the seven years since the Camp Fire, the Town of Paradise has focused on safe rebuilding and repopulating. Now with a town population of over 11,000, and about 9,000 in Magalia and Stirling City, The Abaris Group has been contracted to assess the current state of healthcare delivery in the Paradise Ridge Service Area (herein defined as the Town of Paradise, and the surrounding communities of Magalia and Stirling City), project future demand for such services, and provide recommendations to meet the current and future healthcare needs of the community. This document is intended to serve as a plan for rebuilding the healthcare system over the next 5, 10, and 15 years.
The report is divided into four sections:
Section 1: Investigation of past, current, and projected population demographics for the Paradise Ridge Service Area for the next 5, 10, and 15 years
Section 2: Assess current healthcare infrastructure, ranging from clinics, EMS, EDs, hospitals, and long-term care
Section 3: Share key findings and provide a plan for action Section 4: Provide a summary of the report and include appendices Methodology
The information contained herein was obtained through over 40 hours of semistructured qualitative interviews with local leadership, community members,
3 Urseny L (2019) Adventist Health Finalizes Layoffs at Feather River Hospital 220
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 5
foundations, healthcare providers, and Town and County leadership, in part, as recommended by Town officials and Abaris staff. Whenever possible, in-person interviews were conducted. The Town and surrounding areas' historical healthcare data were obtained from various governmental sources, including the California Department of Public Health, the California Department of Health Care Access and Information, the U.S. Census Bureau, and academic publications. When possible, data were obtained by local healthcare providers and organizations. In some cases, data was not available or was limited. All data sources are referenced in the footnotes where used.
Due to the extraordinary population changes that have occurred in the Paradise Ridge Service Area since the fire, coupled with the COVID pandemic, many data sources, such as U.S. Census data, may be outdated or limited in scope. Whenever possible, more contemporary or supporting data is presented.
This Paradise Ridge Service Area corresponds to the “Paradise Sphere” as designated by Butte County, with the exception of Stirling City. 4 Findings
The population of Paradise and the entire Paradise Ridge Service Area has experienced dramatic change since the fire, with an immediate drop from over 25,000 persons in the Town of Paradise to under 5,000. The remainder of the Paradise Ridge Service area saw a similar decrease in population. Over the last seven years, the Town population has begun to rebound at a rapid rate but remains far below pre-fire numbers. Growth in Magalia and elsewhere in the service area is also lower. While the median age has been stable, there has been a rapid growth in school-age children with high elementary school enrollment coupled with a higher proportion of persons 65 years and older as compared to Magalia and Butte County.
The birth rate in Paradise is one of the highest in Butte County and is rising the fastest.
4 https://www.buttecounty.net/DocumentCenter/View/3304/Map-of-Paradise-Town-Sphere-of-Influence-PDF 221
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 6
The number of employed people in Paradise showed a rapid drop following the fire, but the unemployment rate, except for 2019-2020, has been relatively steady and is similar to pre-fire levels. Median per capita income has risen slightly since the fire, but per capita poverty rates are high compared to elsewhere in Butte County. The proportion of persons relying on Medicare and Medi-Cal for health insurance is about 49% for both Paradise and Magalia. In Paradise, this has risen about 2% above pre-fire levels.
Following the closure of the Feather River Hospital in Paradise, most of the hospital care needs of the Paradise Ridge Service Area have been redirected to Enloe Medical Center in Chico, representing up to 10% of all inpatient and emergency services provided there. Similarly, most Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transports are also redirected to Enloe Medical Center. There are currently up to three ambulances that provide coverage of the Paradise Ridge Service Area during the day, with a full-time ambulance stationed in Magalia and two 12-hour ambulances stationed in Paradise. Ambulance coverage is reduced to one ambulance between the hours of midnight and 8 am.
The fire also led to a loss of primary care, dental care, specialist care, long-term skilled nursing facilities, and residential care facilities. Currently, primary care and some urgent care (or rapid care) are delivered at the Feather River Health Center on Skyway and the Paradise Medical Group. Many other practitioners have closed or moved to Chico.
Hospital Care
Given the proximity of Enloe Medical Center, the demographic and financial factors described in detail in the report, the prospect of reopening Feather River Hospital or building a new hospital in the next five years is unlikely. In 10-15 years, if there is significant population growth in the Paradise Ridge Service Area, it may be viable to build a hospital in Paradise. The most attractive option to enable a hospital would be a health care district that is controlled by a local board of directors, which entails some public subsidy. Should this path be considered, we recommend that the Town 222
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 7
leadership and the County Board of Supervisors approach the Local Agency Formation Commission and their local state representative and state senator at least several years in advance to prepare legislation that would authorize the formation of a special district. Since funding of the district will require a property tax assessment to subsidize operations, we also recommend that the Town conduct surveys of residents to determine the interest level.
EMS
Current EMS staffing levels are appropriate for the call volume and population; however, residents may perceive the need for enhanced coverage based on the lack of emergency care in Paradise. Current coverage of 48 hours for the Paradise Ridge Service Area is the same as pre-fire coverage, with the notable exception that an ambulance is not posted in Paradise between the hours of midnight and 8 am, however with the loss of the Feather River Hospital, transport times are much longer and the likelihood of an ambulance being out of district is higher than it was pre-fire.
Current call volumes are well below pre-fire levels, and on balance, we feel coverage is appropriate.
As the population continues to grow, additional ambulance coverage will be needed to maintain compliance with response time standards. In the short term, call volume is not sufficient to support a second overnight ambulance stationed in the Town of Paradise. Supplemental funding could increase overnight staffing. A Basic Life Support (BLS) ambulance that is preferentially dispatched to lower acuity calls could be provided at slightly lower cost. Projected population growth indicates about a 50% increase in five years and a return to pre-fire population levels in the Paradise Ridge Service Area within 10 years. Ambulance service coverage will need to increase in proportion to population and call volume.
EMS services are self-sustained through patient care reimbursement and are only viable with patient volume. Should the Town wish to pursue supplemental EMS coverage that otherwise would not be justified by call volume, this could be funded through a County Service Area (CSA), as is the case in Gridley and Biggs. Since a 223
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 8
CSA requires a property tax assessment, we recommend that the Town and the Board of Supervisors survey residents on their interest level.
Urgent Care / Rapid Care
Many low acuity conditions that would otherwise go to the emergency department could be safely handled in a properly equipped urgent care or rapid care.
Fortunately, the Feather River Health Center has a well-equipped rapid care; however, due to provider shortages, the hours are limited or inconsistent. We recommend that the Town partners with Adventist Health to attract and retain providers to staff this clinic. One option is for Adventist Health to subcontract with Enloe Medical Center to staff the Rapid Care Clinic with emergency physicians who are currently contracted to provide emergency care at Enloe Health Center. The Town may consider subsidizing some of the cost of this contract.
Ideally, this clinic could be staffed on a 24/7 basis and, if staffed with emergency physicians, could potentially be capable of receiving appropriately triaged EMS patients. Once the clinic is consistently staffed, we recommend that the Town approach Butte County EMS and the Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS agency to develop alternate EMS destination policies as allowed by state law.
Primary Care and Specialty Care
Clinic services (Primary and Specialty care) are well below pre-fire levels. This is a natural consequence of the drop in population, but also due to the loss of the hospital, which served as an anchor for clinical services and referrals. Primary care physicians often have hospital privileges and provide hospital and outpatient care.
Specialists rely on hospital surgical suites, equipment, and procedure rooms to treat patients, and the loss of the facility makes these outpatient practices more difficult.
In addition to building capacity at the Adventist Health Feather River campus, in the next five years, we recommend that the Town approach other primary care providers, such as Ampla Health, particularly for Medi-Cal population beneficiaries, 224
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 9
and Enloe Health to initiate or expand services in the Paradise Ridge Service Areas.
Ideally, providers who focus on providing care in the Chico area will find benefit in establishing satellite offices that more directly meet the needs of their patients.
Long-Term Care
Pre-fire, there were three skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in the Paradise Ridge Service Aea with a total capacity of 279 beds. Butte County currently has 9 SNFs with a total capacity of 910 beds, none of which are in the Paradise Ridge Service Area. Currently, the smaller population and the shift toward a younger demographic in the Paradise Ridge Service Area are not likely to provide enough demand for rebuilding an SNF. However, as the population continues to grow and/or the demographic of the population ages, expansion of in-home care and additional residential care will likely be needed.
Recommended Action Plan and Recovery
The following recommendations are intended to provide a plan for action for healthcare recovery in the Paradise Ridge Service Area. According to the time frames and population projections, these represent our top recommendations on what we believe is practical and achievable. These recommendations should be applied in parallel whenever possible, such that while working on short-term recommendations, consideration, planning, and groundwork for recommendations in the medium and long term should also be kept in mind. Additionally, the time frames and population thresholds should serve as general guidelines for the phases of recovery. An unexpectedly rapid population growth, for example, may provide opportunities to implement elements of the plan sooner than specified below.
Short Term (0-5 Years, Population up to 15,000)
Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Consider zoning, planning, and Town infrastructure improvements that could pave the way for a potential future hospital.
225
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 10
Begin the early planning process for the formation of a Healthcare District.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
In conjunction with Butte County EMS, the Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS Agency, and Adventist Health:
o Establish a mutually agreeable sustainability plan that monitors EMS volumes for the need of additional ambulance coverage.
o Encourage development of alternate destinations and assess and refer policies for low-acuity patients who can be safely cared for in the Adventist rapid care clinic or transported to a hospital via a rideshare option (see below).
Consider allocating $330,000 for short-term supplemental funding to provide additional coverage in the Town of Paradise between midnight and 8 a.m. Develop rideshare options in partnership with Lyft, UBER, and public transit, for low-acuity patients who may need hospital evaluation but otherwise do not need ambulance transport.
Initiate the process of establishing a Community Service Area that can provide sustainable supplemental funding for overnight ambulance service that exceeds what can be supported by patient volume.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
The Town should continue its partnership with Adventist Health to expand capacity and hours of operation at the Skyway Adventist Health Clinic and Rapid Care by addressing barriers to expansion, such as provider recruitment and a fall-off in patient demand in the evening hours.
Amending Adventist Health’s clinic license with the California Department of Health Services would encourage it to become an urgent care center rather than a rapid care center.
Primary and Specialty Care
Reach out to healthcare organizations to solicit interest in expanding services in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
226
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 11
Consider incentives such as fee reductions, streamlined permits, financial support, and others toward healthcare organizations that express interest in expanding in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
Evaluate public transportation options and make recommendations on routes that maximize efficiency for residents who need to travel from Paradise to the healthcare facilities in Chico.
Long Term Care
Initiate zoning, planning, and permitting incentives to encourage operators to open skilled nursing, assisted living, adult day care, and respite care as local demand for these services grows.
Develop relationships with existing long-term care providers in Butte County and explore opportunities for expansion in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
Medium Term (5-10 years, Population up to 20,000)
Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Prioritize the Healthcare District planning process and initiate public education and discussion related to the formation of a district.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Work with Butte County EMS and SSVEMS to establish nurse navigation for appropriately triaged 911 callers.
Consider establishing a standby BLS ambulance service for transporting clinic patients, as necessary.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Continue to monitor rapid care utilization and consider expansion if demand dictates.
Establish Adventist's willingness and capability to care for low-acuity EMS patients in Rapid Care who would otherwise not need to go to an emergency department.
227
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 12
Primary and Specialty Care
Provide incentives to attract and retain medical providers in the area, such as housing subsidies or loan repayment.
Continue to meet with local healthcare providers to determine other potential barriers or challenges to staff recruitment and retention.
Long Term (10-15 years, Population up to and beyond 25,000) Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Initiate the process of forming a Healthcare District by working with Butte County LAFCO and retaining the services of a specialty firm that can perform the financial analysis and feasibility review needed.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Continue monitoring EMS demand volumes and appropriate coverage. Continue 911 nurse navigation and alternate destination programs previously established.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Consider expanding capacity to provide 24/7 coverage, with the capability to accept low acuity EMS patients.
Primary and Specialty Care
Partner with Healthy Rural California and academic institutions to increase training opportunities in the high schools and community colleges for allied health professionals.
Conclusion
With careful and determined planning, there are tremendous opportunities to rebuild healthcare in all its forms in the Paradise Ridge Service Area. This will depend on multiple factors, including repopulation, planning, and investment. While market 228
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 13
forces would eventually drive investment in healthcare, that approach will likely result in services that lag the present demand.
In the next five years, the Town can initiate concrete actions that can have an immediate effect and lay the groundwork for rebuilding the healthcare infrastructure that will be needed in the next 10 to 15 years. This potentially includes planning for a Healthcare District, developing a CSA for ambulance services, and creating conditions that would attract healthcare providers to live and work in Paradise, such as housing, schools, and other services.
Disclaimer
The content of this report is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for legal advice where necessary. The most accurate, publicly available information and data at the time of preparation was used for the analysis and is subject to change.
229
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 14
Section 1: Population Demographics and Health
Population Characteristics
Paradise was a lumber town that grew rapidly, and by the 1950s had 5,000 residents, growing to over 20,000 by 1966. Incorporated in 1979, the town was considered an affordable place to live for moderate-income households. Marketed as a retirement community, the town had high proportions of residents with some aspects of social vulnerability: low income, poor, elderly, children, and individuals with disability
and fragile
health.
5 18.4%
of the
population was
65 years or
older, and
12.6% of those
under 65
suffered from
health issues or
disabilities. The
national percentages were 16.5% and 8.6%, respectively. 6 One of the most dramatic effects of the Camp Fire was the immediate depopulation of the town and Magalia (Figure 1). The pre-fire population in Paradise was nearly 27,000 residents by 2018, Magalia was 12,671, and Stirling City was 307. The collective population of the surrounding areas in the Upper Ridge, including Magalia and Stirling City, approached over 40,000 persons. Following the Camp Fire, the Town population dropped to as low as 4,000 residents but has since gradually
5 Flanagan BE, Gregory EW, Hallisey EJ, Heitgerd JL, Lewis B (2011) 6 United States Census Bureau (2019) QuickFacts: United States; Butte County, California. 0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Figure 1: Population in Paradise
230
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 15
rebounded to
around 11,000,
based on current
estimates.
7 Magalia's
population is
currently
estimated to be
8,901, down from
its peak in 2018
and with minimal year-over-year growth.8
This regrowth led to a significant change in demographics. Once home to many retirees who were attracted to the area partly because of the hospital and healthcare services available, the Town is now home to an influx of newcomers and younger families from the Bay Area and Southern California seeking affordable housing.
Evidence of this demographic shift can be seen in the significant growth of enrollment in primary and secondary schools and the demand for obstetric and pediatric services, as reported to us in interviews.
9 Despite this, the median age in
Paradise (58) has trended slightly upward since the fire (Figure 2).10 By comparison, the median age in Chico in 2022 was 30.4 years.
7 https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/tables 8 https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/california/magalia 9 https://www.ed-data.org/district/Butte/Paradise-Unified 10 https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data/data-via-ftp.html 0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Figure 2: Median Age in
Paradise (years)
231
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 16
According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2023 American Community Survey Data, the age breakdown in Butte County, Paradise, and Magalia is shown in Figure 3. 11 It
should be noted that U.S. Census data is the best available published data on demographics in the area; however, due to the nature of the rapid population shifts following the fire, coupled with the challenge of conducting the Census during the pandemic, the data may either be dated or incomplete.12 Subsequent American Community Survey Data reports are likely to provide a more reliable estimate of today’s demographic picture. Whenever possible, corroborating information, such as school district and state sources, was used to validate or refute Census data.
Despite these limitations, the data shows some useful patterns for the purposes of this report. While Butte County shows progressively diminishing percentages in each successive age group, Paradise shows a bimodal curve, with similar percentages of those under 18 years of age, smaller percentages of those between 18 and 54, and much higher percentages of those 55 and older as compared to Butte County and Magalia. Magalia shows a hybrid pattern between Butte County and Paradise. The trend toward older individuals in Paradise is more pronounced in the female group than in males.
11 https://censusreporter.org/data/table/
12 https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-25-107160
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
< 18
18-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475-84
85 +< 18
18-2425-3435-4445-5455-6465-7475-84
85 +
Figure 3: Age Distribution (years)
Butte County, CA Paradise, CA Magalia, CA
Male Female
232
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 17
Population Projections
Overall, the California Department of Finance projects population growth of about 20,000 persons for Butte County for the next 20 years. The rate of growth is expected to increase after 2029 (Figure 4).
13 The California Department of Finance does not provide growth projections for individual cities, but other sources indicate that since 2020, the Town of Paradise has grown at a much faster rate (13% -22%) than the county, at approximately 1,100 persons per year, and the population is expected to reach nearly 15,000 by 2029.14 Projections beyond 2029 are unavailable for Paradise, Magalia, or Stirling City.
Nevertheless, based on the current rate of growth, 10-year forecasts of an additional 11,000 people (26,000 total) in the town of Paradise are conceivable, at which point the population will likely have fully recovered from the fire. Growth beyond that will depend on housing availability, local policy, and the Town's infrastructure.
While the Town enjoys a robust domestic water system, the lack of a core sewage system may limit commercial development, expansion of public education, and specifically the building of healthcare facilities. Similarly, the lack of higher-density affordable housing, crowded schools, and anemic public transport may limit the regrowth of the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
15 13 https://dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Projections/ 14 https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/california/paradise-butte-county 15 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8500817/pdf/11069_2021_Article_5057.pdf 190,000
195,000
200,000
205,000
210,000
215,000
220,000
225,000
230,000
Figure 4:
Butte County Growth Projections
233
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 18
School Enrollment
Paradise Unified School District (PUSD) enrollment numbers indicate a younger population shift following the fire than is otherwise reported in the 2023 American Community Survey Data. In multiple interviews with community members and PUSD leadership, we’ve learned that younger families are moving back to the Paradise Ridge Service Area. According to the enrollment statistics published by the California Department of Education, total K-12 enrollment has nearly recovered to 2018-2019 numbers (Figure 5). Almost all that rebound has occurred in elementary schools, with middle and high school enrollment numbers remaining below pre-fire levels (Figures 6-8).
16 The extent to which PUSD can accommodate these K-5
students, especially as they advance to higher grades, will determine if families with school-age children will continue to move here. Measure G, which was intended to improve school capability and capacity, failed to gain approval on Nov. 5, 2024.17
16 https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ad/fileshistenr8122.asp
17 https://ballotpedia.org/Paradise_Unified_School_District 0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Figure 5: Total PUSD Enrollment (K-12)
234
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 19
0 50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Figure 6: Elementary School Enrollment
KN 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Figure 7: Middle School Enrollment
6th 7th 8th
235
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 20
Income and Economics
When adjusted for inflation, the resident per-capita median income was relatively stable before and after the fire (Figure 9). Given the steep drop in employment following the fire and the closure of the hospital (see below), this data suggests that for those who remain employed, income has been sustained most likely through employment outside of Paradise.
18 18 https://datacommons.org
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23
Figure 8: High School Enrollment
9th 10th 11th 12th
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Figure 9: Median Per Capita Income In
Paradise (Dollars)
236
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 21
Of the eight major places
in Butte County,
Paradise ranks third by
household median
income at $74,654
(Figure 10).19
A significant impact of
the fire on the local
economy can be seen by the
employment drop and fluctuating
unemployment rate (Figures
11,12).
20 The unemployment
rate steadily declined for eight
years before the fire but spiked
shortly thereafter, with large
fluctuations since 2020. The
pandemic was a contributing factor during this period. Unemployment rates are currently about 2% higher than in the fall of 2018.21
Despite the steady per
capita income shown in
Figure 10, Paradise has
one of the highest
19 https://datacommons.org
20 https://www.bls.gov/lau/
21 https://www.bls.gov/lau/
0 50,000
100,000
150,000
Figure 10: Ranking By Median
Household Income, Butte
County
0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
1990-011991-091993-051995-011996-091998-052000-012001-092003-052005-012006-092008-052010-012011-092013-052015-012016-092018-052020-012021-092023-05 Figure 11: Employed
Persons in Paradise
0 5
10 15
20 25
1990-011991-061992-111994-041995-091997-021998-071999-122001-052002-102004-032005-082007-012008-062009-112011-042012-092014-022015-072016-122018-052019-102021-032022-082024-01 %
Figure 12: Unemployment Rate
in Paradise
237
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 22
poverty levels in Butte County (Figure 13).22
By another indicator, approximately 65% of Paradise Unified School District students qualify for free or reduced meals as opposed to 59.7% for Butte County overall.23 24Low income is a required criterion to qualify for free or reduced meals. This is higher than the overall Butte County rate of 59.7%. The apparent disconnect between relatively high income shown in Figure 10 and the high poverty rate shown in Figure 13 may be explained by a division of wealth among current residents.
Given the relatively small population currently on the ridge, a minority of high-income individuals could push up the median income, despite a substantial proportion who meet the criteria for the poverty level. For example, the proportion of individuals classified
in
higherearning
management occupations since 2017 rose from 11.3% to nearly 14% in 2022. 25 22 https://datacommons.org
23 https://www.ed-data.org/district/Butte/Paradise-Unified 24 https://www.buttecaa.com/north-state-food-bank.
25 https://datausa.io/profile/geo/paradise-ca/
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 Figure 13: Ranking by Population
(Poverty Level)
All Cities in Butte County, per capita
238
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 23
Health Insurance
The average hospital in California has a governmental payor mix of 38.2%.26 The payor mix in Paradise (Figure 14) is 46.4% governmental payors. According to the California Department of Health Care Access and Information, third-party (commercial) payors make up a smaller proportion of the payor mix in areas designated as Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas.27 Typically, areas that have a higher mix of commercial payors is more likely to have greater medical resources and higher adherence to quality standards.28 a The payor mix for Paradise and Magalia is shown (Figures 14, 15). Paradise currently has an equal proportion of private/commercial insurance and Medicare/Medi-Cal, while Magalia has a higher proportion of Medicare/Medi-Cal.29
26 https://www.definitivehc.com/.
27 https://hcai.ca.gov/
28 https://journals.sagepub.com/
29 https://datausa.io/profile/geo/paradise
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Figure 14: Paradise Payor Mix
Private/Commercial Medicare-Medi-cal
239
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 24
According to the
California Health
Care Foundation,
as of April 2024,
Butte County had
40.9% Medi-Cal
enrollees (87,279)
as opposed to
38.2% statewide.
In Paradise, the Medi-Cal rate is 21.5%.
30,31 Figure 16 shows the number of persons
in Paradise, equally divided by sex.
According to the California Health and Human Services Agency (CHHS), the number of Medi-Cal certified enrollees in Paradise and Magalia has steadily increased since January 2020, with a sharp uptick in 2022. It now totals nearly 8,000 persons. 32 30 https://www.chcf.org/
31 https://datausa.io/
32 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2010-012010-062010-112011-042011-092012-022012-072012-122013-052013-102014-032014-082015-012015-062015-112016-042016-092017-022017-072017-122018-052018-102019-032019-082020-012020-062020-112021-042021-092022-022023-072023-122024-05 Figure 16: Medi-Cal Certified Enrollees in
Town of Paradise and Magalia*
Female Male * zip codes 95954, 95969, 95978
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Figure 15: Magalia Payor Mix
Private/Commercial Medicare-Medi-cal
240
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 25
Births
Many in Butte County knew Feather River Hospital (FRH) for its excellent labor and delivery program. We have learned that it was common for parents to choose this hospital for their birth even if they lived outside of Paradise. In addition to the reputation for excellent care, some were interested in their child’s birth certificate documenting that they were born in “Paradise.”
As Figure 17 shows, the
birth rate for residents of
the Town of Paradise had a
baseline of 7.8 births per
100 residents in 2017. It
dropped sharply between
2019 and 2021 before
rebounding to 11.9 in 2023,
the fastest growth rate in
Butte County.
With the closure of FRH, most births that otherwise would have occurred there were taken up by Enloe Health. Oroville Hospital saw a mild increase in births following the fire, but this has declined
since 2022. (Figure 18)
The payor mix (Figure 19)
shows the bulk of births
covered by Medi-Cal,
followed closely by private
insurance. A small number
0 500
1,000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Figure 18: Birth Rate
(per 1,000 Births)
Enloe Health
Oroville Hospital
Feather River Hospital
Other**
0 20
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Figure 17: Birth Rate by
Town/City (per 1,000
Residents)
Biggs Chico
Gridley Magalia
Butte Valley Oroville
Palermo Paradise
241
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 26
of births are to those with self-pay and other government programs.
Population Health
One of the best sources for assessing the health status of a county's population is the local Health Department. According to the 2023 Butte County Community Health Assessment, access to care, behavioral health, and community safety remain significant issues for Butte County residents.33
As detailed in the report, difficulty finding primary care, the rate of primary care physicians per capita, and preventable hospitalizations (an indirect measure of access to primary preventive care), Butte County ranks more than 20% worse than California. By most measures of behavioral health, which includes alcohol related fatalities, overdose deaths, suicide rates, and many others, Butte County also ranks more than 20% worse than California as a whole. In terms of community safety, Butte County has high rates of injury deaths, domestic violence reporting, motor vehicle crashes, and pedestrian accident deaths.
34 33 https://www.buttecounty.net/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=60&ARC=84 34 https://www.buttecounty.net/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=60&ARC=84 0 100
200
300
400
500
600
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Figure 19: Birth Rate by Expected
Payor Source for Delivery (per 1,000
Births)
Medi-Cal Other Gov't Program
Private Insurance Self-Pay
242
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 27
California statewide data paints a similar picture for Butte County, with higher-thanaverage deaths from all cancers, respiratory disease, liver disease, accidental injuries, motor vehicle accidents, suicide, and drug overdoses. 35 The Healthy Persons Index (HPI) is a recognized method for objectively evaluating the social and environmental conditions that directly affect the health outcomes of a population in geographic areas.
36 Communities are ranked in quartiles, with a lower
score indicating less healthy conditions. The HPI maps data from the 2020 U.S.
Census. This includes clean air and water, job opportunities, and many other factors directly linked to life expectancy.
As illustrated by the
HPI map (Figure 20)
the census tracts
encompassing
Paradise, Magalia
and the Upper
Ridge scored
between the less
healthy first and
second quartiles in
terms of healthy
living conditions.
Areas noted in the
index that
contributed to these lower scores were: economic (per capita income and employment rates), social (census response rates), transportation (active commuting, automobile access) and housing (housing habitability, low-income homeowner housing cost burden). On the other hand, Paradise scored well in the
35 https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHSI/CDPH%20Document%20Library/CHSP_Profiles/CHSP-2024.pdf 36 https://www.healthyplacesindex.org
Figure 20: Health Places Index
243
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 28
areas of clean environment, neighborhood conditions, and notably healthcare access (based on rate of insured adults).
Finally, it should be reiterated that the HPI is based in part on the data gathered during the 2020 census and may have significant limitations in assessing today’s conditions. This census was conducted during a challenging period; not only was it just a little over a year after the Camp Fire, it was also the first year of the devasting COVID-19 pandemic. It is reasonable to posit that current conditions are significantly different than those measured in 2020. Nevertheless, it may serve as a useful comparison to other census tracts in Butte County, including those not directly affected by the Camp Fire.
Figure 21 summarizes select 2022 health behaviors characteristics for Paradise, Butte County, California and the United States showing higher rates of smoking, obesity, and binge drinking in Paradise, but better than average physical activity and sleep duration.37
37 https://www.cdc.gov/places/index.html
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
40 Butte County California Paradise United States of
America
Percentage
Figure 21: Health Behaviors (2022)
Binge Drinking Obesity Physical Inactivity
Sleep Less Than 7 Hours Smoking
244
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 29 245
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 30
Section 2: HealthCare Services and Findings
Hospitals and Emergency Departments
With the closure of the FRH, there is no longer a functioning hospital or Emergency Department (ED) in the Town of Paradise. Fortunately, there are three remaining hospitals in Butte County. Around a 20-minute drive from downtown Paradise, Enloe Medical Center in Chico is the closest hospital for most areas of Paradise and the Upper Ridge. Oroville Medical Center in Oroville is about a 30-minute drive from Paradise. Finally, Orchard Hospital in Gridley is about 40 minutes away. All three hospitals are significantly farther away for those living in the Upper Ridge areas.
Enloe Medical Center is a full-service hospital with 298 staffed beds. It provides trauma, stroke, cardiac, obstetric, pediatric, and cancer care, among other services.
It has a large ED with 50 treatment stations and treated 51,963 patients in 2021. In terms of patients seen per treatment station, Enloe's ED averaged 1,039 patients, placing it in the middle of the pack amongst the three Butte County hospitals.38 Oroville Medical Center has 279 licensed beds and provides similar services but is not a designated trauma center. Its ED has 14 treatment stations and saw 7,811 patients in 2021, an average of 558 patients per treatment station.39 Orchard Hospital is a Critical Access Hospital with 24 beds. It provides essential services and only has an ED with five beds. This small ED treated 9,092 patients in 2021, with 1,818 patients per treatment station, making it the most productive ED in Butte County relative to size.40
The closure of FRH likely has redirected demand for services from residents of the Town of Paradise, Magalia, and the entire Paradise Ridge Service Area primarily to Enloe Medical Center, representing between 4-10% of all inpatient and emergency
38 https://hcai.ca.gov/visualizations/emergency-department-volume-and-capacity-by-facility/ 39 https://hcai.ca.gov/visualizations/emergency-department-volume-and-capacity-by-facility/ 40 https://hcai.ca.gov/visualizations/emergency-department-volume-and-capacity-by-facility/ 246
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 31
services provided at this center. While those figures might seem modest, this may represent a significant increase in demand for services that may have already been at saturation (Table 1).
Table 1: Paradise and Magalia Residents Seen at Enloe Medical Center41
Paradise Patients 2024 Visits Percentage of visits Unique Patients Primary Care 365 2.7% 140
OBGYN Outpatient 1,394 6.6% 171
OBGYN Inpatient 267 6.1% 126
ED Encounters 4,434 5.1% 2,489
Inpatient Encounters 1,558 5.6% 1,008
Magalia Patients 2024 Visits Percentage of visits Unique Patients Primary Care 158 1.2% 56
OBGYN Outpatient 705 3.3% 88
OBGYN Inpatient 166 3.8% 25
ED Encounters 3,988 4.6% 2,163
Inpatient Encounters 1,323 4.8% 823
Magalia & Paradise Patients 2024 Visits Percentage of visits Unique Patients Primary Care 523 3.9% 196
OBGYN Outpatient 2,099 9.9% 259
OBGYN Inpatient 433 9.8% 196
ED Encounters 8,426 9.7% 4,652
Inpatient Encounters 2,884 10.4% 1,831
Emergency Department Utilization
41 Source: Enloe Medical Center
247
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 32
Emergency care is typically one of the highest-demand services for any hospital and a primary entry point for eventual admission. Figure 22 represents the ED utilization and admission rates for each of the Butte County hospitals from 2013 to 2023.42 Pre-fire, Butte County hospitals showed a modest increase in ED utilization from 2012-2018. However, this increase was not evenly distributed between the hospitals, and some hospitals saw a decrease in volume during this period. Enloe Medical Center experienced the highest increase in volume, while Oroville Hospital showed the most decrease. Orchard Hospital volume was low but stable, and most notably, FRH’s growth stopped in 2015 through 2017. Had the hospital been open for the entire year of 2018, it likely would have remained flat.
Following the fire, Butte County ED volume experienced a substantial decrease in 2019, reached a record low in 2020, and has grown steadily since. Post-fire volume
42 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/hospital-emergency-department-encounters-by-facility 0 20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Figure 22: Butte County Emergency
Department Visits
ADVENTIST HEALTH FEATHER RIVER ORCHARD HOSPITAL
OROVILLE HOSPITAL ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER
6,728
413
74 64 37
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
ENLOE HEALTH OROVILLE
HOSPITAL
UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA DAVIS
MEDICAL CENTER
ADVENTIST HEALTH
AND RIDEOUT
ORCHARD HOSPITAL
Figure 23: Top 5 ED locations for Paradise
and Magalia Residents (2023)
Zip Codes: 95954, 95969, 95978
248
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 33
remains below that seen pre-fire. The drop in volume seen in 2019-2020 is likely due to multiple factors, including the drop in overall countywide ED capacity due to the loss of the FRH ED, the relocation of many residents out of the county, and, most significantly, the COVID-19 pandemic, when people were much less likely to go to the ED.43 As shown in Figure 23, Paradise and Magalia residents use Enloe Health most frequently.44
Hospital admissions from the ED are another measure of healthcare capacity. Since most hospital admissions originate in the ED, this data provides some insight into current inpatient demand and capacity both pre- and post-fire. Hospital admissions, such as labor and delivery and cancer care, often without an ED stay, are not reflected in this data.
ED admissions show a similar trend to EMS volume with notable differences (Figure 24). Like ED volume, admissions steadily increased from 2012-2018 and gradually declined since then. Several factors could be in play, including population shifts and changing demographics, which could result in fewer ED patients meeting the admission criteria. Additionally, the criterion for admission continues to become
43 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0736467923005012 44 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Figure 24: Emergency Department Hospital
Admissions in Butte County (2012-2023)
ADVENTIST HEALTH FEATHER RIVER ORCHARD HOSPITAL
OROVILLE HOSPITAL ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER
249
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 34
stricter nationally, and patients who may have been admitted 10 years ago are now redirected to home care or short observation stays.
45 Concerning FRH, in the years preceding the Camp Fire, the hospital admission rate from the ED showed a small but steady decline between 2012 and 2018 (Figure 24).
In conversations with Adventist leadership, they expressed concern, even before the fire, about long-term viability due to low inpatient volumes.46 We have been unable to locate data that supports or refutes this assertion.
Understanding where Paradise and Magalia residents are ultimately admitted can help determine usage patterns. Most of these residents are admitted to Enloe Health (Figure 25).47
45 JAMA: Trends by Acuity for Emergency Department Visits and Hospital Admissions in California, 2012 to 2022 46 Interview, Adventist Leadership 11/18/2024
47 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/patient-origin-market-share-pivot-profile-inpatient-emergency-departmentand-ambulatory-surgery 1,990
218
71 33 27 20 18
0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
ENLOE
HEALTH
OROVILLE
HOSPITAL
UNIVERSITY
OF
CALIFORNIA
DAVIS
MEDICAL
CENTER
SUTTER
MEDICAL
CENTER,
SACRAMENTO
UCSF
MEDICAL
CENTER
ADVENTIST
HEALTH AND
RIDEOUT
BUTTE
COUNTY
MENTAL
HEALTH
SERVICES
Figure 25: Hospital Admissions for Paradise
and Magalia Residents (2023)
Zip Codes: 95954, 95969, 95978
250
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 35
One impact of the heavy reliance of Enloe Medical Center Emergency Department as a primary source of emergency care is ED wait times. ED wait times, defined here as the time between arrival and being seen by a midlevel provider or physician (“door to doc”), can vary widely between emergency departments and is dependent on multiple factors, including triage and registration processes, the patient’s condition, demand and capacity of the ED, boarding of admitted or psychiatric patients in the ED, and workforce challenges. The median length of stay in a California ED is 3 hours, as compared to 2 hours 40 minutes in the US.48 ED wait times at individual hospitals are not published publicly, but several indirect indicators can provide an estimate. The first is ED volume (Figure 22). Typically, increased volumes lead to higher wait times. Secondly, the Left Without Being Seen (LWBS) rate, defined as a patient who has been registered in the ED but left before receiving evaluation or treatment from a physician. Finally, the third factor is the acuity level of patients, with higher acuity patients receiving quicker care and lower acuity patients waiting longer.
Based on these three factors, the data suggest that wait times at the Enloe Medical Center Emergency Department are increasing. The overall ED volume in Butte County is well below the peak in 2018 but steadily increasing. As discussed previously, Enloe Medical Center has seen the largest proportional increase of Butte County EDs following the closure of Feather River Hospital (Figure 22), but is roughly on par with 2019 levels. Remarkably, the LWBS rate at Enloe more than doubled between 2019 and 2023 (2.4% vs. 5.8%) and is currently twice the statewide rate. Finally, as a marker of acuity, the admission rate from the ED dropped from 20% to 18.5% during the same period.49
For the purposes of this report, the ultimate question is to what extent Paradise residents are disproportionately impacted by ED wait times at Enloe Medical
48 https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/apyc-v239#data-table 49 https://data.ca.gov/dataset/hospital-annual-utilization-report-pivot-tables/resource/b5ad7f50-e865- 4116-b8ba-0865333e4a96
251
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 36
Center? As shown above, Paradise residents account for close to 10% of ED visits, and their admission rate is higher than the average Enloe ED patient (24% vs
18.5%). Higher acuity patients have a shorter wait time, at the expense of a longer wait time for lower acuity patients, yet over 75% of Paradise patients do not get admitted and are likely to be experiencing longer waits. On balance, by virtue of their higher acuity, a small subset of Paradise patients may have shorter wait times than the entire visitor population; most Paradise patients, as well as most Enloe patients overall, are experiencing longer wait times in the ED.
Hospital and Emergency Department Findings
A key question asked of this report pertains to the viability of a rural hospital in the Paradise Ridge Service Area. We believe that a new hospital is possible in the long term, and we provide specific actions in Section 3 that can be taken to prepare for one.
In the short term, however, one must consider the current fiscal environment of such hospitals in the United States to address this issue. There continues to be a nationwide crisis of financial vulnerability of rural hospitals. More than 30% of all 700 rural hospitals in the United States are at risk of closure. Over the past decade, 139 rural hospitals (20%) have closed, and others have eliminated inpatient services.
Many of those that remain open have eliminated their labor and delivery programs.50,51,52
It was not always this way. From 1950 to 1980, patient care revenue was quite good overall, with the number of inpatient days per 1,000 population increasing by more than a third. This was driven by Medicare and Medicaid (including Medi-Cal), the spread of employer-based insurance, and few utilization controls by private and public payors.53 Between 1980 and 2009, however, the number of inpatient days per
50 https://www.healthcaredive.com/news
51 https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/
52 https://www.kqed.org/news/
53 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1200478
252
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 37
1,000 population fell by half, with both admissions and length of stay declining. For some conditions, the decline in length of stay was even more dramatic; for uncomplicated vaginal delivery, the stay dropped from one week to one day.54 As a busy birthing center, this is a notable statistic for FRH. Under current payment models, care provided to patients beyond set limits for each condition is uncompensated to the hospital.
Over the last 60 years, the financial challenges faced by rural hospitals have continued to worsen.55 Once self-sustaining and independent from the financial system, the healthcare system today, including not-for-profit entities, is tied to the financial sector through investments, venture capital, private equity, and consolidation.56 Due to their relatively low volume and modest real estate valuations, rural hospitals are often not attractive candidates for investment from the financial sector and are entirely reliant on patient care revenue to cover their operating costs.
Another fundamental change in healthcare delivery occurred in the 1990s with the development of managed care. Before then, most insured patients could freely choose their physicians, care was paid as a fee for service, and physicians’ medical decisions were not subject to frequent questions by insurers. Since the 1990s, insurers began selectively contracting with providers and hospitals, and patients began to face financial penalties for obtaining out-of-plan or out-of-network care.57 This had significant implications for small rural hospitals. The 2022 American Hospital Association Report Rural Hospital Closures Threaten Access summarizes several trends affecting rural hospital financial sustainability: patient volume and health, low reimbursement, staffing shortages, rising input costs, and regulatory barriers.58
54 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1200478
55 https://www.healthcarevaluehub.org/
56 https://cepr.net/wp-content/
57 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1200478
58 https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2022/09/rural-hospital-closures-threaten-access-report.pdf 253
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 38
Due to low population density, rural hospitals in the United States have much lower patient volumes than their urban counterparts. These lower volumes challenge these hospitals to maintain fixed operating costs (which constitute about 60% of total expenses), impede participation in performance measurement and quality improvement activities, and often treat older, sicker, and poorer patients compared to the national average. Many of these patients are uninsured and more likely to delay seeking care due to cost, geographic isolation, and limited access to transportation.59,60 These delays contribute to sicker patients requiring more costly care.
Most rural hospital revenue today comes from government payors (Medicare and Medicaid). Unfortunately, both programs reimburse less than the cost of providing these services, and rural hospitals cannot offset low public program reimbursement rates with revenue from patients with commercial coverage. In the commercial insurance market, many rural hospitals have limited bargaining power and are forced to accept below-average commercial rates or are left out of networks entirely.61 Staffing is another major challenge faced by rural hospitals. Despite around 20% nationwide rural populations, only 10% of physicians in the United States practice in rural areas. The COVID-19 pandemic worsened this situation, with nearly one-third of hospitals anticipating critical staffing shortages. Many hospitals were forced to employ contract nurses that almost doubled staffing costs.62 The pandemic also dramatically increased hospital input costs. In addition to labor costs as described above, drug costs are up 36.9%, and costs of other supplies increased by 15.9%.63 Finally, regulatory costs for rural hospitals, which are the
59 https://ruralhospitals.chqpr.org/Costs.html
60 https://www.aspe.hhs.gov/
61 https://www.kff.org/health-costs/i
62 https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2022/09/rural-hospital-closures-threaten-access-report.pdf 63 https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2022/04/2022-Hospital-Expenses-Increase-Report-Final-Final.pdf 254
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 39
same as for large urban hospitals, constitute a much higher burden on rural hospitals with lower patient volume in terms of cost per patient.64 In California, one in five hospitals is at risk of closure due to the financial strain of the pandemic, high inflation, staff shortages, and systemic insurer underpayment.65 For reasons discussed here, Adventist Health leadership has told us in interviews that FRH's financial sustainability was in question even before the fire. FRH was a tremendous resource on the Ridge and is increasingly unusual for a community of this size. In today’s healthcare marketplace, Feather River Hospital likely would not have been built, and if the remaining facility was fully functional, the operating costs would exceed projected revenue.
When rural hospitals shut down, patients must travel further for emergency care and routine medical services. Patients who lack transportation may forego care altogether. Several categories of hospitals have emerged to serve rural populations.
Building hospitals today is also a challenge. There are significant barriers to constructing a new hospital in California, where construction costs due to land, labor, materials, equipment, and seismic standards drive the price to more than twice that of other states.66 Current estimates range from $8-10 million per hospital bed.
Critical Access Hospitals
Some residents have noted that other rural communities, such as Biggs and Greenville (Plumas County), continue to have sustainable hospitals despite lowdensity populations like the Paradise Ridge Service Area. As relevant examples, these two hospitals serve very remote areas and qualify as Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs), a designation given to eligible rural hospitals by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).67 The benefits of CAH status include improved reimbursement rates and capital improvement costs from Medicare, flexible staffing
64 https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2022/09/rural-hospital-closures-threaten-access-report.pdf 65 https://calhospital.org
66 https://www.scripps.org/news_items/7609-the-high-cost-of-building-california-hospitals 67 https://www.cms.gov/medicare/health-safety-standards/certification-compliance/critical-access-hospitals 255
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 40
and services, and Flex Program educational resources, technical assistance, and grants.
To qualify as a CAH, a hospital must meet specific conditions:
1. Have 25 or fewer acute care inpatient beds
2. Be located more than 35 miles from another hospital
3. Maintain an annual average length of stay of 96 hours or less for acute care patients
4. Provide 24/7 emergency care services
These conditions exclude many hospitals in California. Only one Butte County Hospital (Orchard Hospital) is designated as a CAH. Based primarily on location, a hospital in Paradise would not qualify as a CAH, with Enloe Hospital 14 miles from Paradise. A map of California CAHs (Figure 41) is attached.68 Micro-Hospitals
The micro-hospital is an industry designated concept that began in 2017 and has become popular in some areas. So far, they have opened in at least 19 states and are attractive because they can provide short-term care on a more cost-effective basis than large regional medical centers. Typically affiliated with larger regional hospital systems, most are suburban or rural areas and, in some cases, have been constructed in communities with large elderly populations or in areas attracting young people for economic reasons. They are intended to partner with and augment capacity at large urban medical centers.
69 There is no licensing category or legal designation for micro-hospitals in California.
Nevertheless, a micro-hospital is broadly defined as a fully licensed, semi-acute inpatient facility with anywhere from 15,000 to 50,000 square feet and five to 15 inpatient beds that provides typical “core services,” including an ED, inpatient
68 https://calhospital.org/issues/rural-health-care/the-critical-access-hospital-network-ccahn/ 69 https://www.bottomlineinc.com/health/aging/micro-hospitals-a-growing-trend 256
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 41
pharmacy, lab, and imaging. Other additional services may include women’s, dietary, primary, and surgical services. Micro-hospitals seek to provide services at a lower cost to patients than similar services performed at a larger hospital facility.
Additionally, these services are provided 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Micro-hospitals have the advantage of providing care closer to home, can treat various conditions, with lower costs than traditional hospitals, and are attractive to investors because of lower costs and higher reimbursement. On the other hand, there is concern about the safety and experience of doctors working in these small facilities, infection control challenges associated with high patient turnover, and regulatory barriers. Fundamentally, these hospitals seem to be driven by market forces rather than where medical services are needed, and they require a wealthy population that can support them. Lower income areas such as the Ridge and Upper Ridge, who would benefit from such a facility, may not have the financial means to support it.
70 Again, while no legal designation or definition for a “micro-hospital” exists in California, Table 2 lists all small California Hospitals with 15 or fewer beds that might be considered similar to micro-hospitals as described earlier. Thirteen of these 21 hospitals are designated as CAHs. The remainder are either in urban areas or serve a select population or health plan. Since a CAH is not an option for Paradise, it is useful to look more closely at the small hospitals that are not CAH and determine if they represent viable options for the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
Most of the small non-CAH small hospitals are either affiliated with a nearby fullsized hospital, are located in large urban or provide limited specialized surgical, psychiatric, pediatric care, sub-acute, or rehabilitation services. (Appendix) AHMC Seton Medical Center Coastside is an example of a non-CAH hospital serving a population similar to the Paradise Ridge Service Area. Unfortunately, the prognosis for this facility is not positive. This is a small hospital that serves the
70 What are micro-hospitals?
257
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 42
coastal communities of the City of Half Moon Bay, and the surrounding communities of Moss Beach, Montara, and El Granada for a combined population of about 22,000. It is primarily a skilled nursing facility that has a small emergency department and inpatient capacity with very limited capability. It is a satellite facility for AHMC Seton Medical Center, 14 miles away, in Daly City.
Due to its limited capability, the San Mateo EMS agency reports that ambulances are not authorized to transport high acuity patients there, in particular trauma, stroke and chest pain patients. Unfortunately, within the last 10 years, Seton Hospital and Seton Coastside have been struggling financially71 and at times have not been able to accept ambulance patients. They are currently being sued72 by the California Attorney General.
71 https://www.smdailyjournal.com/
72 https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-bonta-ahmc-must-maintain-healthcare-services 258
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 43
Table 2: California Licensed Hospitals with ≤ 15 Inpatient Beds73 Hospital City County
Licensed
Beds CAH
Surprise Valley Community Hospital Cedarville Modoc 4 X Southern Inyo Hospital Lone Pine Inyo 4 X
AHMC Seton Medical Center Coastside Moss Beach San Mateo 5 Healthbridge Children's Hospital-Orange Orange Orange 6 Laguna Honda Hospital And Rehabilitation Center San Francisco San Francisco 6 Anaheim Community Hospital, LLC Anaheim Orange 6
Modoc Medical Center Alturas Modoc 8 X
Catalina Island Medical Center Avalon Los Angeles 8 X
Jerold Phelps Community Hospital Garberville Humboldt 9 X Bear Valley Community Hospital Big Bear Lake San Bernardino 9 X Eastern Plumas Hospital-Portola Campus Portola Plumas 9 X Patients' Hospital of Redding Redding Shasta 10
Seneca District Hospital Chester Plumas 10 X
Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital Solvang Santa Barbara 11 X Adventist Health Sonora - Fairview Sonora Tuolumne 12
West Covina Medical Center West Covina Los Angeles 13
Mammoth Hospital Mammoth Lakes Mono 13 X
George L. Mee Memorial Hospital King City Monterey 13 X Sutter Surgical Hospital-North Valley Yuba City Sutter 14 Providence Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital-Sotoyome Santa Rosa Sonoma 15 Hazel Hawkins Memorial Hospital Hollister San Benito 15 X Healthcare Districts
Some communities that might otherwise not have a private or not-for-profit hospital have formed Healthcare Districts to provide a mechanism for public subsidization, typically through a parcel tax.
What is a Healthcare District?
A Healthcare District, like a fire, water, or sewer district, is a legal subdivision of the State of California, an independent public agency, created to address the healthcare needs of a specific geographic area. They exist to fill healthcare gaps, especially in communities with limited access to providers, underserved populations, and high
73 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/hospital-annual-utilization-report 259
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 44
numbers of uninsured or low-income residents. They maintain a close connection to their communities by offering services tailored to local needs with a purpose to enhance public health outcomes with accountability, transparency, and local control.
Unlike a private corporation, these districts, as governmental entities, must comply with all financial reporting and obey state laws governing public records, record keeping, elections, and public access to documents.74
Governance of Healthcare Districts
Health Care Districts are governed by an elected Board of Directors, generally consisting of five members. These directors must be registered voters residing within the district and are elected at large to represent specific geographic zones within the district. These zones are drawn to reflect population distribution and regional diversity, ensuring balanced representation across the district. Under the governance and authority of the Board, the Health Care District can impose property tax, enter contracts, purchase property, exercise the power of imminent domain, issue debt, hire staff, etc.
Services Offered by Healthcare Districts
HealthCare Districts are empowered to provide a wide array of services aimed at maintaining and improving public health. These include:
Construct and operate hospitals and other health facilities In medically underserved areas, recruit physicians and support their practices Managing ambulance services
Running wellness and prevention programs
Supporting rehabilitation and aftercare services
Offering free clinics and diagnostic centers
Promoting health education and mental health initiatives
74 https://www.achd.org/about-healthcare-districts/
260
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 45
Districts can also collaborate with community groups and healthcare providers to ensure holistic and inclusive care tailored to the needs of their residents.
Steps Toward Formation of Healthcare Districts
The formation of a new Health Care District is initiated by the community itself; residents sponsor the proposal and guide it through a structured legal and administrative process. Initial steps include consulting with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to define appropriate service boundaries and develop a sustainable financial plan.
Sponsors must:
Determine the logical, financially viable boundaries for the district Identify the services the district will offer based on community need Prepare and submit a feasibility study, preliminary budget, and service plan Fundraise to cover application and legal costs
The Petition Process
Forming a district begins with a petition signed by at least 12% of registered voters within the proposed boundaries. This petition must include:
A formal statement under the Local Health Care District Law and the CorteseKnox Local Government Reorganization Act The proposed district's name, boundaries, services, estimated budget, and capital costs
Designation of up to three chief petitioners with contact information Affirmation that the plan is consistent with the service area of existing districts or cities
The Role of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) 261
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 46
LAFCO is a state-mandated local agency that oversees the creation, reorganization, or dissolution of special districts like HealthCare Districts. 75 Once the petition is verified by the County Registrar of Voters, LAFCO reviews it in collaboration with the State Office of Health Planning and local health planning agencies. A 60-day comment period follows; agencies that do not respond are considered to have "no comment."
LAFCO assesses:
Proposed boundaries and financial feasibility
Potential effects on existing agencies
Environmental impacts and required assessments
Projected tax revenues and service costs
Following public hearings, LAFCO may approve, amend, or deny the proposal. If approved, a resolution is forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors, who serve as the conducting authority. An election is then called within the proposed district:
Without a new tax, a simple majority vote is required With a new tax or special assessment, approval must come from two-thirds of voters
Upon voter approval, the district is formally established, governed by a publicly elected board, and accountable to the community it serves. These districts must comply with California laws on public meetings, financial reporting, and transparency, ensuring residents maintain oversight of their local healthcare system.
Election Cost
Usually there is an estimated cost based on a dollar amount per registered voter which will increase or decrease as a result of factors such as a special election solely for the purpose of forming the health care district (highest cost), district
75 https://www.buttelafco.org
262
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 47
boundaries that cross county lines (two ballots), or ballot(s) that include other elections (lowers cost).
Legal and Administrative Fees: Preparing necessary documentation, such as feasibility studies and financial analyses, and navigating the approval process with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) can incur significant costs.
Public Outreach: Engaging the community through meetings, informational materials, and campaigns to garner support for the district's formation. Operational Planning: Developing strategic business plans and long-term objectives to ensure the district meets community health needs effectively.
Potential Revenue
Healthcare Districts are often allocated 1% of the Real Property Tax collected by the county and may impose a property tax. A measure to impose a property tax must be approved by 2/3 of the registered voters in the district. The tax rate is based on the assessed value from county tax rolls, not the market value of the taxable property.
PAJARO VALLEY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT EXAMPLE
This information is drawn from public sources and should be considered approximate and unverified.
Formation of the District
Pajaro Valley Health Care District (PVHCD) was formed through legislation (Senate Bill 418), passed unanimously and signed into law on February 4, 2022. It was created by a non-profit formed for this purpose: a partnership between the County, the City, the local FQHC, and the local health trust. The nonprofit purchased the hospital out of bankruptcy and established the district, then transferred the hospital to it to provide public oversight. The district boundaries span two counties and approximate the local school district boundaries. The Board of Supervisors made 263
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 48
initial appointments to the PVCHD board, then board members were elected by the public.
Hospital Purchase 2022
The cost of the hospital purchase, PVHCD formation and transitioning hospital ownership to PVHCD was approximately $67M.
Top donors with approximate commitments:
State of California $ 25,000,00
County of Santa Cruz $ 5,500,000
County of Monterey $ 3,000,000
City of Watsonville $ 400,000
Central California Alliance for Health $ 3,000,000
Institutional
Community Trust of Pajaro Valley $ 6,000,000
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Driscolls $ 7,500,000 $ 1,750,000 Blue Shield of California $ 1,000,000
Private Donations $ 7,000,000
Pledges $ 2,000,000
Gifts $ 200,000
Working Capital
Cash at Closing $ 4,200,000
Total $ 66,500,00
0 Bond Measure (Measure N) 2024
Bond Measure N passed with 2/3 vote authorizing the sale of up to $116 million in general obligation bonds to fund the acquisition and improvement of property (to acquire the hospital’s land back) to be repaid through property tax levies on taxable property in the district for 30 years. If all bonds are issued and sold, the total 264
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 49
estimated repayment (principal + interest) is $230.1 million. Assessment rate per parcel is an average estimated annual rate of $24 per $100,000. The approximate population is 94,349 with 40,000 household units and 43,000 registered voters in Santa Cruz County and 4,500 registered voters in Monterey County. The number of parcels in the district was not available.
SONOMA VALLEY HEALTHCARE DISTRICT EXAMPLE
The Sonoma Valley Healthcare District is another relevant example. Created in 1946, it funded the opening of their 24-bed hospital (Sonoma Valley Hospital) in 1957, which also includes a 27-bed skilled nursing facility. Measure F, recently passed, renewed and extended the parcel tax for the district at $250 per parcel for 10 years, generating about $4 million per year. The district covers a population of 42,000 persons.
SAN BENITO HEALTHCARE DISTRICT EXAMPLE
The presence of a Healthcare District, however, does not guarantee that a hospital will not experience financial difficulties. In 2023, the San Benito Healthcare District, which operates Hazel Hawkins Hospital in Hollister, filed for bankruptcy, which was ultimately denied. Unfortunately, this hospital, which serves a population of around 67,000 people, remains in financial difficulty.76 District tax revenues for 2024 were just under $5 million, net patient service revenue was $150 million and total operating expenses were $145 million.
77 In 2017, the hospital was designated as a
CAH, increasing revenue from Medicare patients by more than $6 million annually.78
PALM DRIVE HEALTHCARE DISTRICT EXAMPLE
Palm Drive Hospital in Sebastopol, despite creating a Healthcare District in the 1990s, continued to struggle financially and finally closed in 2020. This district
76 https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/california-hospital-ineligible-for-bankruptcy-court-rules.html 77 https://www.hazelhawkins.com
78 https://www.hazelhawkins.com/images/FYE-06-30-2020-Audited-Financial-Statements.pdf 265
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 50
served a population of 50,000 persons, and residents are still paying off $25 million in debt with an annual parcel tax of $155.79
Due to the current and medium-term population projections for the Paradise Ridge Service Area and the industry trend of small rural hospital closures, a full-service hospital is not likely to be financially sustainable for at least the next 10 years.
However, as the population continues to rebound, a micro-hospital that could provide emergency and short stay inpatient capacity or a Healthcare District may be a viable option for the Paradise Ridge Service Area, provided it is seen as an attractive investment by a health system or private equity firm. A more attractive option is the formation of a Healthcare District that provides the significant advantage of enabling public oversight and a steady revenue stream, but this requires intensive study and voter approval as described above.
In summary, it may be best to focus on developing and leveraging existing resources to match residents' current and medium-term needs rather than rebuilding or reopening a general acute hospital in the short term. When the services of a general acute hospital are needed, there needs to be robust methods to ensure safe and timely transportation to other local hospitals and alternate means of care when appropriate.
79 https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/article/article/palm-drive-health-care-district-moves-forward-withdissolution/ 266
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 51
Emergency Medical
Services
Emergency Medical Services are
similar to what existed before the fire,
but as pointed out later in this report,
ambulance availability may not be as
robust around the clock as it once
was. In Section 3, we provide
recommendations for specific actions
that can be taken to optimize
ambulance coverage in the Paradise
Ridge Service Area.
Paradise is served by three CalFire
Stations: 35, 81, and 82 (Figure 26).
Station 35 staffs one engine company year-round with a captain, engineer, and firefighter per shift. They respond to approximately 1,500 calls per year.80 Station 33 (Upper Ridge) and Station 82 also staff one engine company each with one captain, an engineer, and a firefighter, and respond to about 1,600 calls for service each year.81 During the fire season, this staffing is augmented with additional personnel.
CalFire does not provide transportation services from either station.
The second response layer is from paramedic ambulances provided by Butte County EMS and operated by Enloe Health.
82 It is a high-quality service with Commission on
Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) accreditation. 83 Advanced Life Support
(ALS) providers are trained for more advanced medical interventions that are less frequently utilized, such as IV medications and fluids, limited surgical procedures,
80 https://www.buttecounty.net/Facilities/Facility/Details/Station-35-Paradise-12 81 https://www.buttecounty.net/Facilities/Facility/Details/Station-33-Upper-Ridge-11 82 https://www.bcems.org
83 https://www.caas.org
Figure 26: CalFire Fire
Stations
267
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 52
and most importantly, expertise in patient evaluation and appropriate destination.
Most transport services in California are at the ALS level. Typically, each ambulance covers a much broader geographic area than a fire station. Since they respond over longer distances and transport patients to the EDs, their time on task for any typical incident is much longer than that of first responders.
Butte County EMS also operates medical helicopters with Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) capabilities, allowing them to fly under more weather conditions than those limited to Visual Flight Rules (VFR). Medical helicopters provide rapid transport over long distances and, since these are staffed with specially trained nurses, bring additional medical capabilities to the scene and during transport. They are most valuable for critical patients when transport destinations are a substantial distance (e.g., > 30 minutes by ground), the patient requires specialty care (e.g., pediatrics, burn treatment), or when local ambulance resources are stretched due to a multiple casualty incident, for example.
In some situations, helicopters are not the most appropriate resource and can lead to delays in definitive care. There are multiple steps involved in transporting a patient by helicopter:
Ground unit arrival on scene to determine need
Request for air transport
Identification of a landing zone
Weather checks and liftoff time
Loading of patient to meet at landing zone
Travel time to the landing zone
Transfer of patient from ground unit to helicopter
Flight time to destination hospital helipad
Offload of helicopter and transfer to the ED
Methods to minimize the time involved in some of these steps include autolaunching aircraft based on dispatch information, geographic location, and pre268 Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 53
identification of
multiple suitable
landing zone options
that may be closer to
the incident. The
patient is usually best
served by immediate
ground transport to
the appropriate
hospital, provided
ground travel times
are 30 minutes or less. Therefore, pre-designated landing zones are most important when ground transport times are expected to be very long or when ground access is difficult. These conditions will most likely apply in the upper Paradise Ridge Service Area rather than in Paradise proper, and CalFire reports they routinely use helicopters above the dam. Enloe EMS reports that there are seven predesignated landing zones in Paradise. Their most frequently used landing zones are the Holiday Market parking lot, the old Feather River Hospital helipad and many times, directly on the Skyway roadway.
EMS Volume
The Sierra-Sacramento Valley EMS Agency reports that the 911 EMS call volume in Paradise, Magalia, and the Paradise Ridge Service Area in 2017 was 5,472 (an average of 15 per day).
84 The volume dropped to about 1,300 calls per year in 2019 and is slightly less than half of pre-fire volumes in 2024 at 2,295. The rate of 911 calls that result in transportation to a hospital has remained steady at approximately 78% (Figure 27). Before the fire, 93% of ambulance transports were taken to FRH; since the closure of FRH, most transports are now taken to Enloe Health Center. 85 84 https://www.ssvems.com
85 SSVEMS data, John Poland, Administrator
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Responses Transports
Figure 27: Paradise/Magalia
911 Responses and Transports
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
269
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 54
Figure 28 shows the number of EMS transports to Butte County EDs from 2013 to 2017. This data comes from the State of California and only covers these years; unfortunately, it is unavailable after 2017.86 Nevertheless, it does provide a picture of how ambulance transports were allocated between hospitals in the county. Enloe Medical Center received the most ambulance transports and had about double the EMS volume of either FRH or Oroville Hospital (Figure 24). 87 The volume of EMS traffic provides only part of the picture. Transported EMS patients can vary widely in terms of severity, and a significant proportion have nonurgent conditions, and travel time to the hospital is not clinically significant. The acuity level of patients brought to FRH was high as compared to other Butte County Hospitals (Figure 29).
88 While FRH received about half the number of EMS patients as compared to Enloe Medical Center, those patients who were much more likely to have conditions deemed severe requiring time-dependent interventions in the ED (Figure 30).
86 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/emergency-department-services-trends 87 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/emergency-department-services-trends 88 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/emergency-department-services-trends 0 50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
ORCHARD
HOSPITAL
ENLOE MEDICAL
CENTER
FEATHER RIVER
HOSPITAL
OROVILLE
HOSPITAL
Figure 28: EMS Visits 2013-2017
EMS No Admit EMS Admit
270
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 55
Some factors may
account for the
relatively high acuity
taken to Feather River
Hospital. While this
local hospital did not
have the depth and
capability of Enloe
Medical Center,
especially with respect
to trauma, cardiac,
and stroke cases, EMS may have chosen FRH for their sickest patients because of patient preference and proximity. Additionally, with the pre-fire demographics of the Paradise Ridge Service Area trending to older residents, there may have been a higher prevalence of persons deemed as severe, as opposed to younger populations elsewhere in the county.
Sometimes, the closest hospital is not the most appropriate EMS destination.
Standard practice in most California counties is to bypass the nearest hospital in favor of one that could provide time-dependent specialty care such as trauma, stroke, and cardiac cases. It is unclear if such protocols existed before the fire in the 0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
ORCHARD
HOSPITAL
ENLOE
MEDICAL
CENTER
FEATHER
RIVER
HOSPITAL
OROVILLE
HOSPITAL
Figure 29: EMS Transports with
Time Dependent Emergencies
(2013-2017)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
ORCHARD HOSPITAL ENLOE MEDICAL
CENTER
FEATHER RIVER
HOSPITAL
OROVILLE HOSPITAL
Figure 30: Allocation of EMS Time Dependent
Emergencies (2013-2017)
271
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 56
Paradise Ridge Service Area; however, such cases would not be brought to FRH today, even if it were open.
EMS Response Times
Ambulance deployment models are tied closely to demand for services and geographic considerations. The overall objective is to meet response time standards. Before the Camp Fire, a full-time 24/7 paramedic ambulance was staffed in both the Town of Paradise and the Upper Ridge in Magalia. The smaller post-fire population in Paradise led to lower demand, and deployment was adjusted to 12 hours of daily coverage in Paradise, with a 24-hour ambulance continuing in Magalia.
Fortunately, 2025 ambulance coverage has been restored to one 24-hour unit and two 12-hour units. Unit 11, stationed at 14182 Skyway, is staffed 24 hours, 7 days a week. Units 12 and 14 are stationed in Paradise at 1295 Billie Road, from 8am-8pm and 12pm-12am respectively, 7 days per week. Due to lower call volume between the hours of midnight and 8am, there is single ambulance coverage provided by Unit
11. Ambulance deployment is dynamic, and any unit may be out of the area on a transport or covering another call, but Enloe EMS has a policy to backfill the gap with another unit from elsewhere in the county until the regularly assigned ambulance is able to return to its service area.
In 2017, the fractile response time standard (i.e., 90%) was 10 minutes for an ALS ambulance; this was adjusted to 15 minutes following the Camp Fire due to the change in population density. It is standard practice to have different response time zones within a county, as less densely populated areas are more difficult and expensive to serve, making short response times difficult to achieve consistently.
Under the existing EOA contract with Butte County EMS, the Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS Agency (SSVEMS) reports that no specific population threshold or other criteria determines when response time standards are modified. Instead, the system is continually evaluated in partnership with BCEMS and EMS system participants to 272
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 57
ensure appropriate and equitable coverage. SSVEMS stated they are committed to do so periodically as the area recovers.
Dispatch and arrival times are recorded in the dispatch record directly in the CalFire dispatch system and form the basis for determining response time compliance.
Adjusted 2024 response times in Paradise remain within compliance, with an ambulance response meeting the 15-minute standard an average of 93% of the time between January and December 2024 (Table 3).
89 After adjustments excluding
exemptions in accordance with the EMS contract, compliance ranged from 91.9% to
99.8% countywide. According to this contract, exemptions from the response time standard are granted when call volume exceeds 150% of baseline volume as calculated by SSVEMS. Unadjusted raw data was provided to us by SSVEMS for independent analysis.90 SSVEMS reports that the 2024 ambulance average response times fluctuate monthly but are between seven and 10 minutes for any given month.
Table 3: Butte EMS Response Time Compliance
89 https://www.ssvems.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Ambulance-Response-Times-11-2024.pdf 90 Meeting at SSVEMS offices, June 5, 2025
273
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 58
Compared to pre-fire response times, the 2019-2024 response times average 1.5 to
2.0 minutes longer. Most notably, due to the closure of FRH, transport times have tripled (Figure 31).
91 In January 2025, Butte County EMS added 36 additional daily hours of ALS ambulance coverage to Butte County. Twelve of these hours were added to the Paradise/Magalia area to address additional call volume, restoring coverage to prefire levels of two 24-hour ambulances serving Paradise and Magalia. Response time compliance numbers shown in Table 3 were recorded before staffing hours were increased.
Ambulance coverage is expensive and reliant on patient volume and insurance reimbursement for operating revenue. In its first-year financial report under the new SSVEMS agreement of October 2023, Butte County EMS reports an operating loss of $538,526. The estimated balance on June 30, 2022, was $703,170. The fiscal year 2022- 23 revenue was $166,255, with a planned use of $100,227 for contract payments to Butte EMS, LLC, to assist in offsetting the costs of housing an ambulance in South Butte County.92
91 SSVEMS data, John Poland, Administrator
92 https://www.buttecounty.net/DocumentCenter/
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Minutes
Figure 31: Paradise Ridge Service Area
Response and Transport Times
Average Code 3 Response Time Average Patient Transport Time 274
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 59
It is possible to supplement EMS through other mechanisms. For example, to address the need for supplemental ambulance coverage, a Butte County Service Area (CSA 037) was established in 1969 that includes the cities of Gridley and Biggs and the unincorporated community of Richvale; it contains approximately 5,800 parcels. The CSA provides financing to augment the provision of ambulance services within the CSA boundaries, allowing an ambulance to be stationed in Gridley to reduce response times and offer enhanced services. Property taxes, intergovernmental revenues, and interest earnings are the sources of revenue for the CSA. Estimated annual operating cost for a 24/7 ambulance staffed with a paramedic and Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) is $1 million.
EMS Findings
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Paradise and the Paradise Ridge Service Area consist of two layers of response: Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS). Twenty years ago, the capability gap between ALS and BLS was significant. Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) (i.e., BLS) were limited to basic emergency care and could not provide emergency medications, cardiac defibrillation, or advanced airways. Over the past few decades, this distinction has narrowed, as EMTs are now capable of using advanced airways, providing immediate defibrillation for cardiac arrest, giving epinephrine for severe allergic reactions, and administering naloxone for overdoses. Indeed, several of the most time-critical field interventions that used to be reserved for the paramedic (i.e., ALS) level are now provided at the BLS level in the State of California. Fire-based BLS can stabilize and initiate treatment in most situations, and ALS transport personnel can provide additional treatment as needed.
Most first responders provide BLS care, especially in suburban and rural communities. In almost every EMS system, the local fire agency provides this service and is typically the first on the scene due to the well-positioned fire stations.
In Paradise and Magalia, CalFire provides this.
275
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 60
Before the fire, Butte County EMS staffed two full-time (24/7) ambulances in Paradise and Magalia. With the drop in call volume following the fire, staffing had been modified to 12 hours daily in Paradise and 24 hours daily in Magalia. Many community members said they would be more comfortable if 24/7 ambulance service was dedicated to Paradise around the clock. As of January 2025, 48-hours of coverage has been restored in Paradise and continues in Magalia through a combination of a 24-hour ambulance stationed in Magalia, two 12-hour ambulances stationed in Paradise between 8am and 8pm hours and 12 pm – 12 am respectively.
Between the hours of 12 noon and 8 pm, a total of three ambulances are dedicated to the Paradise and Magalia area. From midnight to 8am, the Paradise Ridge Service Area is served by a single ambulance stationed in Magalia, but additional coverage is available from other Butte County units as needed.
The response time standard (formerly at 10 minutes pre-fire) remains at 15 minutes, like other rural, low-density population areas in Butte County. The Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS Agency does not stipulate a population density threshold that would trigger a change in the response time standard but rather evaluates the response time compliance and call volume on a continual basis to determine the appropriate response time.
The closure of the FRH ED has a direct impact on ambulance availability. Though it is helpful that ambulance coverage hours have been restored, due to the need to transport to further away hospitals, the additional time that an ambulance is committed for each patient and the return to the Upper Ridge can result in less immediate ambulance coverage than was experienced pre-fire. If both units are committed to a call (or the single unit between midnight and 8am), additional units are reassigned from elsewhere in Butte County to backfill until these usual units are back in service. As is often the case, call volume is unpredictable, and multiple simultaneous calls for service can result in delays for available units to respond from greater distances.
276
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 61
Unlike fire and police services, which are supported through public funding, EMS is typically funded exclusively through patient billing and reimbursement, which is true for Butte County EMS. This financial model continues to strain the EMS industry significantly and likely needs national reform.
93 Nevertheless, to be financially
sustainable, any EMS service needs patient transports.
94 Due to low overnight call
volume, and concerns about response time, subsidization of ambulance coverage may be necessary to augment ambulance availability. There are various mechanisms that have been used to fund EMS services. In November 2022, Colusa County voters approved Measure A that authorized 0.5% sales tax specifically allocated to emergency ground transport services up to $2.4 million annually.
Some rural areas have chosen to subsidize ambulance services through CSAs to partially fund enhanced coverage. The Gold Ridge Fire Protection District (GRFPD) in Sonoma County wanted to increase how quickly paramedics reached their residents, as it only has EMTs on its fire engines and the closest ambulance station was in the neighboring city. Their residents passed a parcel tax to add ALS service.
Based on the low call volume, GRFPD decided to contract with the private ambulance provider to station a 24-hour ambulance in its fire district with a higher station priority (i.e., at what level of available units it is covered) than the EMS Agency contract dictated based on call volume. In exchange for roughly $700,000/year, the increased staffing and station priority have resulted in faster response times for the GRFPD community.
A similar arrangement in Butte County is the Gridley-Biggs ambulance service (provided by Butte EMS) through a community service agreement (CSA-037)95 enacted in 1969. The revenue generated from this CSA is approximately $100,000 per year which, in addition to revenue captured through patient billing, is not sufficient to cover the cost of ambulance services there. This CSA was enacted before Proposition 13 and is based on assessed valuation. Current average fee for
93 https://www.jems.com/ems-management.
94 https://www.ems.gov/assets/NEMSAC_Final_Advisory_EMS_System_Funding_Reimbursement.pdf 95 https://www.buttecounty.net/
277
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 62
5,800 parcels is approximately $18 per year. There are current conversations about raising the assessment rate as it has not been adjusted for many years.
CSAs are generally reserved for unincorporated areas, however, after describing the Paradise Ridge Service Area, which, in addition to the incorporated Town of Paradise includes the unincorporated areas of Magalia and Stirling City, Butte County LAFCO believes that a CSA would be possible.96 Limited federal grant funding97 for EMS services is available but none are currently designated specifically for funding ambulance coverage. Given the current cost-cutting activities at the federal level, the availability of these grants in the future is uncertain. In conversations with Butte County EMS98, the estimated cost to provide ALS ambulance service stationed in Paradise between the hours of midnight and 8am is $330,000 annually.
Butte County EMS is investigating the utility of adding BLS-only ambulances to the system to be used for lower acuity transports that could preserve ALS ambulance availability in the system. This is an increasingly popular model used nationwide and is made possible by the high-fidelity Emergency Medical Dispatch protocols that can identify and categorize calls for service by acuity level, currently in place in Butte County. BLS units could be dispatched to the scene in addition to ALS units, dispatched for an intercept location where the ALS unit can transfer care to the BLS unit, or ideally, dispatched in lieu of an ALS ambulance when deemed appropriate.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care Clinics
Urgent care clinics are significantly different from Emergency Departments. An urgent care clinic, also interchangeably called a rapid care or prompt care center, treats non-life-threatening medical conditions that require immediate attention, like lacerations, minor infections, and sprains. A hospital ED is designed for serious or
96 Conversation with Steve Lucas, Butte County LAFCO, Executive Officer on April 23, 2025 97 https://www.naemt.org/resources/federal-funding
98 Conversation with Jenny Humphries, Butte County EMS, Director, on 4/14/25 278
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 63
potentially life-threatening situations, such as severe injuries, chest pain, and loss of consciousness. For severe cases beyond the urgent care’s capability, the patient will be transferred to an ED for treatment and possible hospital admission.
Typically, urgent care clinics have shorter wait times and are less expensive than EDs but may also have more limited hours of operation than the ED, which is always open. Urgent care clinics are less likely to be staffed with physicians who are specialty-trained in emergency medicine and have access to specialty care, such as cardiology, orthopedics, and many others that would be found at a hospital. The range of capabilities between urgent care clinics can vary widely, from simple medical evaluation and treatment to full-service imaging and lab services.
Paradise has a rapid care clinic, located at 5125 Skyway. While the terms “rapid” care and “urgent” care are often used interchangeably, Adventist Health is classified as a rapid care center, which typically offers same-day and walk-in primary care services. While rapid care and urgent care both address non-emergency conditions, rapid care is typically for less serious, non-immediate conditions like minor injury or illness, while urgent care typically handles a broader range of conditions, including those requiring immediate attention.
According to CDPH, if a clinic location wishes to provide urgent care services, it does not need a separate license but must file a change of service application and get approval. There are no formal standards or minimum criteria that a primary care clinic must meet to operate as an urgent care center.
Urgent care clinics exist in Chico and the surrounding area. Many of these clinics are closed during the evening or on weekends, and many Paradise patients rely on EDs (principally Enloe) for urgent care needs. Numerous residents expressed frustration that the rapid care clinic on Skyway is intermittently closed during business hours.
Adventist Health is aware and states that they have had challenges recruiting the providers necessary to keep the clinic open consistently. Nevertheless, although the 279
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 64
rapid care clinic may be closed, they can often accommodate walk-in patients to be seen by one of their providers elsewhere in the clinic.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care Findings
Feather River Hospital not only provided labor and delivery and other inpatient care but also had a 24/7 ED. When it became clear that the hospital was unlikely to reopen after the fire, there was hope that emergency legislation that enabled FRH to function as a standalone ED would be possible. Although legislation was passed, there was never any regulation or licensing process developed, making the creation of a standalone ED impossible in California.
The option of creating a Freestanding ED was enabled by Senate Bill 156; it authorizes Adventist Health to operate an ED under specific conditions, without needing the ability to admit patients. The legislation, enacted January 1, 2020, was careful to describe this as a special permit and not to be used as a model for other freestanding EDs in California, which continue to be prohibited by state law.
Adventist Health leadership reports that while the legislation allowed the formation of a freestanding ED, no mechanism was ever created, such as state regulations or a permitting process. Nevertheless, Adventist felt that the current population on the Paradise Ridge Service Area would not support such a facility. Ultimately, from its perspective, the healthcare infrastructure on the Ridge is best supported by the ambulatory (clinic) model, under which it plans to build a full-service rapid care center that would have 24/7 services, including lab and imaging.
While severe cases (heart attacks, major trauma) are best cared for in medical centers that have the depth and breadth of hospitals like Enloe, there is local demand for lower acuity emergency care, such as minor illness, fractures, or lacerations that otherwise would need to be treated in an ED. A high-functioning urgent care or rapid care facility could handle most of these conditions, thus avoiding distant ED visits. While one does exist in Paradise, many report that the hours are limited and inconsistent. Adventist Health, which operates this facility, reports that its 280
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 65
biggest limitation is staffing, which it has struggled to address. Adventist also reports that their usage statistics show a sharp drop in demand after 3pm each day.
Fortunately, there is a full-service hospital nearby in Chico that provides a wide spectrum of care from emergency care, labor and delivery, oncology and trauma care. Many have communicated to us that emergency room waits can be very long and were likely worsened as they absorbed additional patients due to the closure of Feather River Hospital.
281
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 66
Primary and Specialty Care
Physician and Medical Professional Supply
According to the Rural Health Information Hub, Butte County, like most rural and semi-rural California counties, has a shortage of primary care providers (Figures 32- 34).99
99 https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org
Figure 32: Primary Care Shortage Areas
282
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 67
The map for dental care in
Butte County is similar,
showing 8.1 providers for
every 10,000 patients.100
The behavioral health
outlook is even more
challenging. Nationwide
HRSA projections show a
rapidly diverging gap
between supply and
demand. The continuing
decline of professionals
with this expertise and the
rapidly increasing demand
will lead to a shortage of
over 100,000 providers by
2037.
101 Data shows a
similar picture in Butte
County and the upper third
of California with shortages.
Many causes of premature death are amenable to easy access to primary health and preventive care, cancer, risk behavior screenings, and follow-up care. The biggest obstacle to access to care is the lack of primary care physicians. The 2024 County Health Rankings Reports show that Butte County has only one physician for every 1,710 residents, compared to California, which has 1,210 residents per
100 https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/data-explorer?id=199&state=CA 101 https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/workforce-projections Figure 33: Dental Care Shortage Areas
Figure 34: Behavioral Care Shortage Areas
283
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 68
physician.102 Each person living in Paradise, Magalia, and Stirling City competes with about 1,600 others for care from a single provider (Figure 35). 103,104
To address the provider shortages in Butte County, Healthy Rural California was founded as an independent 501(c)(3) that grew from the Butte-Glenn Medical Society. After intense work, Healthy Rural California has recently become accredited for graduate medical education. This year, it launched a four-year community psychiatry program in conjunction with UC Davis and Stanford. Years Two through Four will have experiences in Chico. Starting in July 2025, it is also launching a three-year family practice residency program based at Enloe Health in Chico.
This is very promising, as residency programs have been shown to enjoy relatively high retention rates of clinicians who choose to remain in the area in which they trained. Indeed, 77.7% of all residents who train in California stay and practice medicine in California, and at least half will practice within 100 miles of their training program.105
The stakeholders
interviewed reported
that Town of
Paradise residents
currently receive
primary care from a
handful of places.
Individuals with
employer-sponsored
or private insurance
tend to get their
102 https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/healthdata/california?year=2024&measure=Primary+Care+Physicians&tab=1 103 https://datausa.io/profile/geo/paradise-ca/?provider-clinician_patient_ratio=provider1 104 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/primary-care-shortage-areas-in-california 0 500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Figure 35: Patients per
Primary Care Provider
284
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 69
care from Adventist
Health Feather River,
Paradise Medical
Group, Enloe Medical
Center, and a handful
of private practices in
Chico. Individuals with
Medi-Cal tend to go to
Feather River Indian
Health, Northern
Valley Indian Health,
and Ampla.
Stakeholders report that many providers relocated to Chico and surrounding areas or left the area entirely following the fire. They state that this has caused substantial challenges in accessing care due to the inconvenience of travel or lack of transportation. In addition, individuals voiced a lack of trust in providers who do not live in the community, which results in a hesitancy to seek care.
In 2010, the federal Affordable Care Act established network adequacy standards for Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) to maintain. In California, these minimum standards include full-time physician to patient ratios of 1,200:1 (and a primary care physician ratio of 2,000:1), primary care network providers within 30 minutes or 15 miles of each covered person's residence or workplace, and nonurgent appointments within 10 business days of request. For specialty care, this standard is 15 days, provided additional delay will not impact the patient’s health, and geographic access to a hospital within 30 minutes or 15 miles of each person’s residence or workplace.106
106 https://www.chcf.org/
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Figure 36: Paradise Medical
Group Appointments
285
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 70
For purposes of network adequacy, the California Department of Health Care Services (DCHS) publishes travel time and travel distance standards for HMOs that provide primary care based on the population densities of each California county and zip code.107 Based on population density DCHS divides California counties into four categories; Dense, Medium, Small and Rural. Butte County, with a population density of 51-200 persons per square mile, is considered a small county. The travel time and distance standard for adult primary care, pediatric care and ob-gyn is 30 minutes and 10 miles, respectively.
Stakeholders noted it is difficult to get an appointment for primary care, whether for an acute need, monitoring of a chronic issue, or a preventive checkup. Providers interviewed also confirmed this information, citing two to three-month average wait times for an appointment for existing patients and up to six months for new patients.
These wait times substantially exceed the goal of non-urgent appointments being available within 10 business days of the request. The Northern Valley Indian Health and Ampla Health’s website offers same-day options for urgent issues for existing patients. Stakeholders indicated that the difficulty in getting appointments dissuaded them from seeking care.
Paradise Medical Group reports that due to the partial loss of its facility in the Town of Paradise, it has relocated most adult and all pediatric services to Chico. Figure 36 shows the volume of appointments since 2017. These appointments include all appointments with physicians, nurses, medical assistants, case managers, and other staff. Enloe Medical Center reports expanding outpatient adult primary care services focused on those with private insurance. The numbers for Enloe Medical Center primary care are shown in Table 1. Ampla Health has multiple locations including a small office staffed by a single provider in Magalia that provides both adult and pediatric primary care with a focus on the Medi-Cal population. It continues to expand its offerings of primary care services with a new site about to open in Chico.
Ampla Health reports that in 2024, its Chico sites saw 4,379 patients from the
107 https://gis.dhcs.ca.gov/datasets/CADHCS::mcna-t-d-standards-by-county/explore 286
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 71
Paradise/Magalia/Sterling City/Foothills area, and the Magalia site saw 2,890 patients from that area. It could not be determined if these numbers have duplicates, i.e., if the same person sought care at multiple sites.
Feather River Tribal Health108 is an accredited health care organization that serves approximately 5,000 native and non-native persons in Butte County and includes the Paradise Ridge Service Area as their assigned service area. Eric Lyon, Executive Director, estimates that they have approximately 200 clients and about 5 staff members who live in the Paradise and Magalia area. They currently have two clinics in Oroville and Chico that provide primary care, specialty care, dental, pharmacy, physical therapy, acupuncture, diabetes education, and pediatric services.
Fortunately, Feather River Tribal Health is very interested in supporting the Paradise Ridge Service Area with medical services and pharmacy services, and last year, they were investigating a piece of property in the Town of Paradise as a potential clinic site. They ultimately decided that the cost of fire insurance and a septic system was cost-prohibitive. They also expressed concern about finding medical staff for that clinic. They are currently focused on improvements in their existing clinics in Chico and Oroville.
The Adventist Health Clinics in Paradise are a significant source of Primary and Specialty Care. Annual clinic volume was significantly impacted by the fire but is showing steady rebound. Most visit growth since 2021 has been in specialty care, rapid care, dental and behavioral health (Figures 37, 38). Radiology volumes have been steady at the clinic with between 9,000 x-rays and 3,000 ultrasounds performed annually between 2021 and 2024. Mammography and MRI services were added in the fall of 2024, and to date, nearly 600 and 800 exams have been performed, respectively. Laboratory volumes have also steadily increased from 8,000 tests performed in 2020 to nearly 14,000 in 2024.
108 https://frth.org
287
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 72
Using both anonymous location data from consenting users via mobile application partners, and data provided by Adventist Health, Figures 39-40 provide insight into -
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Figure 37: Adventist Health Annual Clinic
Volume
Series1
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Figure 38: Adventist Health Annual Clinic
Volume (2021-24)
2021 2022 2023 2024
288
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 73
hourly clinic activity since 2017.109 Hourly visits follow a typical pattern for outpatient clinics, with peaks in mid-morning and mid-afternoon. A tiny proportion of visits occur after 6pm. The busiest days are Tuesdays, with minimal activity on the weekends. In rapid care, one of the busiest periods is Sunday mornings but very little traffic arrives after 4pm.
Figure 39: Adventist Health Hourly Visits (2017-2024)
Figure 40: Adventist Health Rapid Care Visits (January-October 2024)
109 https://www.placer.ai/
289
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 74
Most Butte County Medi-Cal patients are enrolled under Managed Medi-Cal administered by Partnership HealthPlan of California (Partnership), which covers nearly a million people in 24 Northern California Counties. A 2024 report shows that 86,393 people in Butte County are enrolled in Partnership, about 70% (60,053) of whom have been assigned to a clinic as their medical home. Table 4, provided by Partnership, shows the number of patients assigned to various Medi-Cal clinics in Butte County as of April 2024.
Table 4: Medi-Cal Provider Panel Capacity
Ampla Health has multiple locations, including a small office in Magalia staffed by a single provider. Partnership took over Medi-Cal managed care for Butte County in 2024. They report that they have been unable to get reliable data from the previous managed care entities (Anthem Blue Cross Partnership Plan and California Health and Wellness Plan), so longitudinal data is limited.
290
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 75
Primary and Specialty Care Findings
Pre-fire, the Town of Paradise had a selection of specialty care providers such as oncologists, cardiologists, obstetrician/gynecologists, and gastroenterologists. These specialties, which are primarily focused on specialty diagnostic and surgical procedures that require a hospital or ambulatory surgery center, can no longer conveniently function without such facilities nearby. The hospital and specialty clinics rely on each other to create a medical ecosystem, and neither is likely to exist without the other.
As is the case for primary care, the California Department of Health Care Services (DCHS) publishes travel time and travel distance standards for HMOs that provide specialty care based on the population densities of each California county and zip code.110 For specialties such as cardiology, gastroenterology, oncology/hematology and many others, the time and distance standards are 75 minutes and 45 miles, respectively, which must be met for 90% of the county population. In some counties, such as Butte, there is a greater allowance for low density zip codes and low supply counties.
111
Health plans may choose to apply other metrics to determine level of specialty care provided to a given community. In conversations with Adventist Health Care, their goal is to provide local orthopedic care to a population base of 10,000 persons or more, and cardiology and neurology for a population of 20,000 persons or more. 112
Our nation continues to struggle with a shortage of health care professionals, which include doctors and advanced practitioners, particularly in rural areas. The Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) estimates a nationwide shortage of 40,000 primary care professionals, and is projected to increase to 57,000 by
110 https://gis.dhcs.ca.gov/datasets/CADHCS::mcna-t-d-standards-by-county/explore 111 DMHC Specialist Physician Geographic Access Standards and Methodology 112 Chris Champlin, President, Adventist Health Rideout 291
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 76
2037.113 While the supply of family medicine physicians shows a modest annual increase of 3%, the demand for these services is growing 12% yearly.
Primary care is the backbone of population health. Primary care physicians not only provide acute and chronic medical care but, just as importantly, provide preventive care to avoid disease development or identify disease in early stages to mitigate progression. As the Sacramento Bee succinctly states, “Primary Care is worthy of the name–healthcare that is accessible, comprehensive, continuous and coordinated.”114 While it is not uncommon for some to exclusively seek care at an urgent care or ED, these facilities cannot provide the type of primary care continuity necessary to ensure long and healthy lives.
Unlike EMS systems and hospitals, aside from some Medi-Cal requirements, there is neither mandatory data reporting nor a centralized repository for primary care.
Therefore, it is difficult to assess changes in primary care sources over time, including details regarding the number of patients seen, or visit count, without each facility providing its data. Many providers and facilities cannot pull such data from their electronic systems or, for business reasons, are hesitant to share that information. As a result, this report primarily relies on qualitative reports from stakeholder interviews and cannot quantitatively compare the current primary care to what existed pre-fire.
Few options exist for residents to receive primary care and specialty care within the Town of Paradise. Adventist Feather River appears to be the leading pediatric and adult primary care provider. This is not necessarily unreasonable given the proximity of Primary and Specialty Care services in Chico. The distance to Chico is within the most accepted healthcare standards, such as insurance determinations of network adequacy, which state that primary care networks should have providers within 30 minutes (or 45 minutes for specialty care) of a person’s residence or workplace.115
113 https://data.hrsa.gov/topics/health-workforce/workforce-projections 114 https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/article293836414.html 115 https://www.chcf.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/12/NetworkAdequacyStandardsHowTheyWorkWhyTheyMatter.pdf 292
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 77
Nonetheless, stakeholders indicated this is a concern regarding seeking care and economic benefit to the Town.
While some governmental entities, including several California counties, provide direct healthcare services, it is difficult and not financially feasible without a subsidy.
The Town could consider policies and programs that support existing providers in continuing to offer services within the Town boundaries, encourage agencies from elsewhere to relocate or expand into the town, and encourage new start-ups. An economic development specialist might have more detailed suggestions, but here are some possibilities.
There is an overall shortage of healthcare professionals within the Town of Paradise and throughout Butte County. Stakeholders unanimously stated that the main barrier to expanding primary care services is recruiting and retaining qualified medical professionals. The Town of Paradise can take actions to encourage healthcare professionals to choose it over other places to live and work.
Multiple stakeholders indicated that the Town needs to be further along in the recovery process and have amenities that attract healthcare professionals. As the Town sets recovery policies, solicits new business growth, and develops new community programming, it should consider and prioritize the desirable characteristics specific to the healthcare professional demographic. Stakeholders voiced that most healthcare professionals who are either starting to practice or are considering relocation have families and want to live in communities that support their lifestyle. These individuals seek quality, modern housing, solid school districts, restaurants, shopping, and other amenities.
Long Term Care Facilities
Skilled Nursing Facilities
As of June 2018, there were three skilled nursing facilities (SNF) in the Town of Paradise: 1) Paradise Post Acute with 44 beds, 2) Cypress Meadows Post Acute 293
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 78
with 136 beds, and 3) Pine View Center with 99 beds.116 All three facilities have been closed since the fire, and no licensed SNFs are currently located on the Paradise Ridge Service Area. Table 5 lists current SNFs in Butte County, all of which are in Chico, Oroville, and Gridley.117,118
Table 5: Current SNFs in Butte County
Facility Name City Bed Count
Arbor Post Acute Chico 144
Autumn Creek Post Acute Chico 184
California Park Rehabilitation Hospital Chico 90
Chico Terrace Care Center Chico 76
Country Crest Post-Acute Oroville 59
Feather River Care Center Oroville 50
Gridley Post Acute Gridley 82
Oakwood Healthcare Center Chico 99
Oroville Hospital Post Acute Center Oroville 126
Board and Care and Assisted Living
Butte County has 41 adult residential care facilities, none in Paradise or the Upper Ridge. Pre-fire, there were two adult daycares (Cove and Cove II) and one residential care facility (Gerhardt Care Home) in Paradise. As reported by the California Department of Social Services, they are listed as closed as of 2020. 119
Long Term Care Facility Findings
There is currently an undercapacity in the Paradise Ridge Service Area for long-term care facilities (SNF and Board and Care) but, in Section 3, we outline strategies that would be useful to encourage providers to return. Pre-fire, there was a total capacity
116 https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/licensed-healthcare-facility-listing 117 https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHCQ/LCP/CalHealthFind/Pages/SearchResult.aspx 118 https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHCQ/LCP/CalHealthFind/Pages/SearchResult.aspx 119 https://www.ccld.dss.ca.gov/carefacilitysearch/DownloadData 294
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 79
of 279 SNF beds for a population of approximately 40,000 residents (one bed per 143 residents) and currently there are zero beds for approximately 20,000 residents.
There are several factors that influence the location of SNFs including but not limited to accessibility and convenience (proximity to family, access to healthcare infrastructure, transportation, and community resources) and regional demographics (elderly population concentration, income distribution). Pre-fire, many of these conditions were present that made SNFs viable in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
There was a larger population with a high concentration of elderly, there was close access to FRH, and abundant community resources.
Post-fire, a smaller population with a demographic shift toward younger families, along with a lack of a local hospital currently makes the prospect of opening a SNF in the Paradise Ridge Service Area less likely.
295
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 80
Section 3: Recommended Action Plan for
Recovery
This report has highlighted many of the structural challenges inherent to our healthcare system that the Paradise Ridge Service Area will face in the coming years as it recovers for this disaster. Fortunately, there are many positive steps that can be taken to facilitate and optimize the recovery. The following recommendations are ranked, in our opinion, within each time frame and population in order of priority.
We prioritized items that we believe are most achievable and yield the greatest benefit in proportion to the time and effort required. Some recommendations may be implemented in a short time frame, and others will take longer or may be dependent on changing conditions. While we have attempted to rank these in order of maximal effect, we recommend that they be adopted simultaneously whenever possible, rather than serially.
Short Term (0-5 Years, Population up to 15,000)
Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Consider zoning, planning, and Town infrastructure improvements that could pave the way for a potential future hospital. We suggest continuing conversation with Adventist leadership to understand the considerations and potential infrastructural and local regulatory barriers to building a hospital in the Paradise Ridge Service Area.
Begin the early planning process for the formation of a Healthcare District.
This should start with public conversation to inform the public of the purpose, risks, and benefits of a Healthcare District. Eventually, some polling or surveys to gauge public interest are recommended.
296
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 81
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Work with Butte County EMS (Jenny Humphries) and SSVEMS (John Poland) to develop a sustainability plan that monitors the additional need for ambulance coverage beyond the 48 hours daily coverage at Paradise and Magalia, particularly additional ambulance coverage between midnight and 8 a.m.
While 48 hours of coverage pre-fire was deemed sufficient by most, the longer transport times necessary following the closure of FRH increase time on task for ambulance transports, leaving the Paradise Ridge Service Area uncovered more often, and could justify coverage beyond pre-fire levels, especially if re-population and call volume increases as projected. The metrics best monitored are call volume during these overnight hours, response times, and the frequency of events where no ambulance was available from the Magalia unit. Any significant change in any of these values may indicate the need for additional coverage.
Partner with Adventist Health, Butte County EMS, and SSVEMS to develop alternate destination policies as allowed under state law for low-acuity patients who could be safely triaged and treated at the local rapid care facility or who can get care using other transportation options.
Alternate destinations are allowed under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 9, Chapter 5; however, these are limited to sobering centers and authorized mental health facilities. It is possible, through triage protocols, for EMS personnel to determine that a low acuity patient no longer needs EMS care, in which case, the urgent/rapid care would be an acceptable destination.
Typically, patient billing, and therefore revenue capture, is limited to patient transportation to an emergency department, but many insurers are instituting a payment model for EMS when transporting to a lower level of care. 297
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 82
Adventist Health would need to agree to have their rapid care or clinics available to accept low-acuity ambulance patients. Butte County EMS and SSVEMS would need to develop protocols and procedures for EMS personnel to use to appropriately triage patients. If properly implemented, this program could shorten transport times, decrease the likelihood of delayed ambulance availability, and decrease costs and inconvenience for patients who would otherwise need to go to an emergency department for low-acuity conditions.
Consider funding mechanisms to subsidize an ALS ambulance to cover those hours. The approximate cost is $330,000 annually. Funding could be provided directly from the Town budget, through the eventual formation of a CSA, or a county-wide sales tax. Alternately, as BLS ambulances become integrated in the 911 response plan, this could be covered by a BLS ambulance at a marginally lower cost while an ALS ambulance remains available at Magalia. Initiate the process of establishing a Community Service Area (CSA) that can provide sustainable supplemental funding for overnight ambulance service that exceeds what can be supported by patient volume.
Subsidized funding through a CSA or other source may be an option to cover negative operating margins. There are multiple steps for forming a County Service Area, including picking the boundaries, which would need to include the unincorporated areas of the Paradise Ridge Service Area, providing a description of the service area, conducting a service analysis, providing a cost estimate, and developing a theoretical three-to-five-year budget. LAFCO suggests that instead of a fee based on assessed valuation, a fixed fee is more appropriate. At this point, the 1996 Proposition 218 process120 applies, which entails two elections: the first is to gain voter approval to form a district, the second is to approve fees on parcel owners.
120 https://www.lao.ca.gov/1996/120196_prop_218/understanding_prop218_1296.html 298
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 83
Develop rideshare options such as public transit, Lyft, and Uber for patients who can be safely triaged and treated at a local healthcare facility. Some jurisdictions have entered contracts with these services to lock in a set rate.
This will likely require some public subsidization for individuals who cannot afford these services. The process for contracting with Uber, for example, is established on their website.121
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Continue partnership with Adventist Health to expand capacity and hours of operation at the Skyway Adventist Health Clinic and Rapid Care by addressing barriers to expansion, such as provider recruitment and a fall-off in patient demand in the evening hours.
Amending Adventist Health’s clinic license with the California Department of Health Services would encourage it to become an urgent care center rather than a rapid care center.
The Skyway Adventist Health clinic facility could have many of the essential elements of a high-functioning urgent care facility, including lab and imaging services. Continue the Adventist Health partnership to optimize the hours and capability of the Skyway rapid care facility to provide predictable services throughout the day and evening. As an existing primary care and rapid care clinic, Adventist Health could apply to the DHS for status as an urgent care clinic.
Primary and Specialty Care
Reach out to healthcare organizations beyond Adventist Feather River to solicit their interest and willingness to expand services into the Town of Paradise. Initial expansions would likely need to be sized appropriately for the
121 https://www.uber.com/us/en/business/
299
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 84
current population, such as part-time satellite offices for primary care or specialty services that could expand as there is greater local need. Consider incentives that would minimize relocation or start-up costs, such as waivers of permit fees, tax reductions, subsidized rent or facility upgrades, colocation with governmental services, joint grant applications, and financial support.
Consider options to support and stabilize existing providers. This could include incentives for maintaining services at a certain level. It would also mean consideration of this group when making policy decisions that could indirectly impact them. The Town could additionally require that the contractors it hires provide health coverage that includes local providers as participating providers.
Evaluate public transportation options and make decisions on routes that maximize efficiency for residents who need to travel from Paradise to the main healthcare facilities in Chico.
Long Term Care
Initiate zoning, planning, and permitting incentives to encourage operators to open skilled nursing facilities, assisted living, adult day care, and respite care as local demand for these services grows.
Continue to monitor the demographics of the Paradise Ridge Service Area. If there continues to be significant growth and/or a shift toward a higher concentration of elderly residents who may need long-term care, the Town should approach operators of SNFs elsewhere in Butte County to solicit interest in local expansion.
In-home care, assisted living, adult day care, respite care and continuing care communities may serve as an alternative to residential long-term care for some individuals. The Town should initiate or optimize the planning process that would enable the zoning, permitting and construction of residential 300
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 85
continuing care facilities that could provide the spectrum of services from assisted living to respite care for residents.
Medium Term (5-10 years, Population up to 20,000)
Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Prioritize the planning process and initiate public education and discussion related to the formation of a Healthcare District.
The process of forming a Healthcare District can be lengthy and requires review and approval by the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) and subsequent voter approval as described herein.122 The significant advantage of a Healthcare District serving the entire Paradise Ridge Service Area is that it could insulate a future hospital from the financial risk of operating one in an area that might otherwise be unattractive to a privately owned corporation. However, it would require taxpayer approval and result in a tax assessment. Should you wish to pursue this option we recommend contracting with a firm that specializes in Healthcare Districts to perform the financial analysis and feasibility review needed.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Work with Butte County EMS and SSVEMS to establish nurse navigation for appropriately triaged 911 callers.
Many EMS systems have identified a significant proportion of 911 calls that could be safely handled without transportation. With online medical expertise using nurse navigation and a robust referral process for obtaining next-day urgent care or primary care visits, ambulance resources could be preserved for higher acuity calls. Appropriate care and follow-up could be provided at a
122 https://www.buttelafco.org
301
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 86
lower cost and with higher convenience for the patient. Some Local EMS Agencies have entered contracts with Exclusive Operating Area Contractors to require the use of navigation services. The current contract with Butte County EMS does not include this provision and would need to be included in future contracts or revisions.
Consider establishing a standby BLS ambulance service for transporting clinic patients as necessary.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Continue to monitor rapid care utilization and consider expansion if demand dictates.
Establish Adventist's willingness and capability to care for low-acuity EMS patients in Rapid Care who would otherwise not need to go to an emergency department.
As the population expands, continue to monitor rapid care utilization, and consider expansion of hours if the demand is there.
Eventually, consider expanding services to 24/7 schedule to handle lowacuity cases around the clock, some of which may arrive by EMS if authorized by SSVEMS (see EMS recommendation #3), relieving pressure on the Enloe ED and Butte County EMS.
Primary and Specialty Care
Provide incentives to attract and retain providers to the area, such as subsidized housing or loan repayment. Consult with local healthcare organizations to identify top barriers that providers report when considering practicing in the Paradise Ridge Service Area. For example, if providers report a lack of affordable housing, consider initiatives to attract higher density housing that would relieve pressure on the housing market. 302
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 87
Continue to meet with local healthcare providers to determine other potential barriers or challenges to staff recruitment and retention. Assist in addressing residents’ challenges in getting elsewhere for their needed care. Evaluate public transportation options and make decisions on routes that maximize efficiency for residents who need to travel from Paradise to the main healthcare facilities in Chico.
Long Term (10-15 years, Population up to and beyond 25,000) Hospital Care and Emergency Departments
Initiate the process of forming a Healthcare District by working with Butte County LAFCO and retaining the services of a specialty firm that can perform the financial analysis and feasibility review needed.
Pre-Hospital Care (EMS)
Continue monitoring EMS demand volumes and appropriate coverage. Continue 911 nurse navigation and alternate destination programs previously established.
Urgent Care/Rapid Care
Consider expanding capacity to provide 24/7 coverage, with the capability to accept low acuity EMS patients.
Primary and Specialty Care
Partner with Healthy Rural California and other academic institutions to increase training opportunities, starting with high school students through graduate education, to expand the pipeline of healthcare professionals invested in the Butte County and Town of Paradise area. 303
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 88 304
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 89
Section 4: Summary and Conclusions
The devastating Camp Fire of 2018 transformed the Town of Paradise and the Upper Ridge in many ways, creating challenges and opportunities for the future. The many challenges include rapid depopulation, loss of economic activity, increased housing costs, and, of course, the gutting of the healthcare infrastructure. Rebuilding the Ridge provides the opportunity to build a fire-safe community with higher-quality housing and supporting infrastructure that more closely matches the new population.
This report aims to identify significant healthcare system changes within the Town of Paradise since the 2018 Camp Fire and recommend strategies to improve services in the short, medium, and long term.
Before the fire, Paradise and the Paradise Ridge Service Area communities of Magalia and Stirling City had higher than average access to services with a rural hospital that included unique specialties of labor and delivery, and cancer care as well as connected outpatient services. Stakeholders also report they saw healthcare providers in individual private practices. Since the fire, the hospital has closed permanently, and stakeholders report these private practices have closed.
Stakeholders feel these changes are a significant loss and are looking to the Town to help rebuild their healthcare system.
The evaluation of this loss also needs to acknowledge the changing context of the healthcare system that coincided with the fire, independent of it. In addition to the dramatic closings of small hospitals nationwide, there has been a notable shift in primary care delivery. Across the board, physicians are shifting from running independent private practices to working for hospitals, health systems, and other healthcare organizations.123 Reasons cited for this shift include addressing administrative burdens, economic pressures, and improving patient care due to easier coordination with other specialties. Moreover, insurance companies have
123 https://www.ama-assn.org/
305
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 90
shifted payment methodologies to encourage the development of patient-centered medical homes and capitation, which are also more feasible in larger systems.
Consequently, even if the fire had not happened, the healthcare environment in the Town of Paradise would likely look substantially different today than in 2018.
Recovery from the fire in Paradise is ongoing, and there are encouraging signs of repopulation and rebuilding today. As recovery occurs, while many things will be rebuilt, it will inevitably need to be done differently than they were historically.
Healthcare delivery is one of them.
Previous research has shown that different community sectors, such as housing, public services, education, commerce, and healthcare, are interdependent, all of which directly impact a community's well-being.
124 In many interviews there were
consistent themes: that the hospital, along with churches and schools, was one of the three fundamental pillars of this community, and the new Paradise will need to focus on restoring these pillars in a way that meets the present and future needs of its residents and is consistent with the changes in the healthcare system that have occurred since the original founding of FRH. Rather than a hospital, at least in the short and medium term, that third pillar should be built as a robust outpatient care system that complements hospital care elsewhere in the county.
Though the quality of every home in Paradise starts with a solid foundation, the same applies to the rebuilding of an entire community. While this report focuses on healthcare delivery's present and future design, many other factors in the rebuilding process are interdependent. Ultimately, the healthcare system the Town wishes to create cannot exist without the population supporting it.
This report provides an overview of the present and projected population and specific recommendations to improve healthcare today and tomorrow. Any strategy that focuses on repairing only one pillar is unlikely to be entirely successful.
124 Feng K, Wang N, Li Q, Lin P (2017)
306
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 91
Disclaimer
The content of this report is for general informational purposes only and is not intended to substitute for legal advice where necessary. The most accurate, publicly available information and data at the time of preparation was used for the analysis and is subject to change.
307
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 92
Appendix
Organizations interviewed
Healthcare and Insurance
o Adventist Health
o Enloe Health
o Paradise Medical Group
o Ampla Health
o Partnership HealthPlan
Local Government
o Butte County Public Health
o Butte County Behavioral Health
o Paradise Unified School District
o Paradise Town Council
o Paradise Town Leadership and administration
o Paradise Irrigation District
o Paradise Recreation and Park District
Emergency Services
o CalFire
o Paradise Police Department
o Enloe EMS
o Sierra Sacramento Valley EMS Agency
Community Organizations
o Paradise Ridge Chamber of Commerce
o Moms on the Ridge
o Paradise Citizens Alliance
o Upper Ridge Committee
o Camp Fire Collaborative
o Rebuild Paradise Foundation
o Healthy Rural California
308
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 93
Interview Summaries
Approximately 35 hours of interviews, both in person and remote, were conducted with various community members, local leaders, healthcare systems, clinics, and business representatives. Key findings from these interviews are summarized below and include:
Healthcare
1. Emergency Care Delays
Long wait times for emergency care due to dependency on Enloe Hospital. Travel times to Chico or Oroville are excessive, especially for Upper Ridge residents.
The proposal for a freestanding ED or 24/7 rapid care facility on the Ridge has not been realized.
COVID-19 exacerbated healthcare workforce shortages.
The existing rapid care facility in Paradise is staffed intermittently.
2. Healthcare Access
Limited primary care, pediatricians, specialty care, and dental services are available.
High insurance costs and lack of local healthcare facilities deter new residents from repopulating Paradise, especially elderly residents who desire local access.
There is a need for a comprehensive medical complex offering primary care, lab services, and specialized care.
3. Mental Health and Substance Use Services
Lack of adequate mental health services and substance abuse treatment. Integration of mental health services within primary care settings proposed. 309
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 94
Extensive Narcan distribution and MAT services to combat opioid crisis.
4. Trust Issues with Healthcare Providers
Distrust toward Adventist Health due to perceived mismanagement and lack of transparency.
Many felt that the reimbursement to Adventist Health should have been directed to repairing and reopening the Feather River Hospital. Community desires reliable, professional healthcare facilities.
Infrastructure and Economic Development
1. Sewer System Limitations
High costs and land requirements impede new business development. Advocacy for sewer improvements to support growth.
2. Broadband and Connectivity
Inconsistent high-speed broadband availability.
Explore solutions like Starlink and cellular-based internet.
3. Housing and Population Changes
There was a significant population reduction post-fire and substantial ongoing rebuilding efforts.
Rezoning for higher density residential projects, including affordable housing. Challenges in attracting new residents due to inadequate healthcare and infrastructure.
Demographic changes trending toward younger families have led to explosive enrollment growth in the local school district.
4. Economic Factors
310
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 95
Loss of higher-income professionals post-fire affects the local economy. Efforts to rebuild and promote the Ridge through campaigns like "Welcome to the Ridge."
Fire Safety and Emergency Services
1. Wildfire Experiences and Resilience:
Importance of resilient building standards and defensive measures against future fires.
Emphasis on creating defensible space and fire-safe practices. Need for improved emergency response times and local emergency facilities. Proposal for 24/7 urgent care facility to handle emergency cases.
2. Innovative Programs
Nature and forest therapy guides to combat stress and improve health. Resiliency programs aimed at building skills within the community.
3. Community Sentiment and Collaboration
High concern over healthcare availability and infrastructure as key factors influencing population growth and economic stability.
Recognition of the interlinked nature of business, healthcare, and infrastructure in fostering a resilient community.
311
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 96
Action Items and Recommendations
1. Healthcare Improvements
Develop and consistently staff an urgent care clinic or standalone emergency room within Paradise.
Integrate mental health services within primary care settings. Promote local healthcare initiatives to attract professionals, especially in primary care specialties.
2. Infrastructure Development
Address high interest rates and insurance costs to facilitate housing transactions.
Invest in sewer system upgrades to support population growth and commercial development.
3. Community Engagement
Foster trust between residents and healthcare providers through transparent communication and reliable services.
Promote community-driven solutions and partnerships to rebuild effectively and sustainably.
312
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 97
Characteristics of Small Non-CAH Hospitals in California Affiliated with a nearby full-sized hospital
Sutter Surgical
Providence Santa Rosa
Adventist Health
No general Emergency Department
Healthbridge Children’s Hospital
Laguna Honda Hospital and Rehabilitation
Anaheim Community Hospital,
Sutter Surgical Hospital-North Valley,
Providence Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital-Sotoyome
Patient’s Hospital of Redding
Adventist Health Sonora-Fairview
Located in large urban areas
Healthbridge Children’s-Orange County
Laguna Honda-San Francisco,
Patients Hospital-Redding,
West Covina Medical-Los Angeles County
Providence Santa Rosa-Sonoma County
Limited specialized surgical, psychiatric, pediatric care, sub-acute, or rehabilitation services
Healthbridge Children’s
Laguna Honda
Anaheim Community
Patients’ Hospital, West Covina
313
Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan Town of Paradise
Prepared by The Abaris Group 98
Critical Access Hospital Map
314
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: October 14, 2025
Agenda Item: 6(d)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Public Works Director
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Facilities Master Plan Direction and Town Hall Security Upgrades
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
Consider adopting a motion to:
1. Receive and file this progress report of the Ad Hoc Facilities Committee.
2. Authorize $50,000 for immediate security upgrades at Town Hall (controlled access, counter glass, and Clerk’s Office escape route).
3. Provide direction on whether the Corporation Yard and Fire Station 82 projects should proceed sequentially with the Facilities Master Plan or in parallel.
4. Establish a Long-Range Facilities Fund in the amount of $9,339,742 (inclusive of $2,774,292 previously received and $6,565,450 received in 2024/2025).
Background:
Since the 2018 Camp Fire, various staff, consultants, and legal teams have been working with the Town’s insurance provider with recent resolutions reached. In this time, the Town of Paradise’s progress in facility recovery has been hamstrung by the uncertainty to budget and value of losses that can be dedicated to rebuilding.
The Town of Paradise lost five structures resulting from the 2018 Camp Fire, listed below:
Fire Station 83 (Wagstaff Road)
Public Works Corporation Yard (American Way)
Quonset Hut (Pearson Road at Sierra Park Drive)
Pentz Road Residence (Pearson Road at Pentz Road)
Jeffords Building (Black Olive Drive)
The Town of Paradise is recently in receipt of its insurance settlement proceeds relating to structure and non-structure losses resulting from the Camp Fire.
On February 11, 2025 Paradise Town Council appointed two Councilmembers (Councilmember Bolin and Culleton) to serve on a Facilities Ad Hoc Committee to review and advise on next steps relating to the Town of Paradise’s overall facilities as well as facilities replacement needs resulting from the 2018 Camp Fire. The mission of the Committee is to assess all Town-owned buildings and properties to determine which should be repaired, rebuilt, repurposed, or considered for 315
disposal. The goal is to support recovery and future operations by aligning facility decisions with current conditions, resources, departmental needs, and long-term community priorities.
Analysis:
The Facilities Ad Hoc Committee conducted an internal Facilities Survey to gather staff perspectives on the condition, functionality, and future adequacy of municipal buildings. The results highlight recurring challenges with aging infrastructure, limited space, and deferred maintenance across several facilities, balanced by strong appreciation for recent investments such as Fire Station 81 and the Building Resiliency Center.
Key findings:
Aging Facilities: Police Department, Fire Station 82, Town Hall, and the Public Works Yard are widely reported as inadequate and in need of modernization or replacement. Recent Investments: Fire Station 81 and the Building Resiliency Center were positively reviewed, though maintenance needs remain.
Common Issues: Outdated wiring, HVAC, and plumbing; insufficient storage and meeting space; mold and leak risks; safety concerns regarding ingress/egress and outdated layouts.
Workforce Morale: Cramped floor plans, poor lighting, and lack of break/outdoor space were noted as affecting morale in some facilities.
Overall, the survey underscores the need for a comprehensive Facilities Master Plan that prioritizes modernization, safety, and employee wellbeing while planning for long-term growth and resilience.
A breakdown by facility evaluated by staff is shown on the next page:
316
Facility Adequacy Maintenance
Issues Safety Concerns Neglect Overall Assessment
Animal
Shelter
Adequate
postexpansion
Roof
replacement
underway
None No Good condition
Building
Resiliency
Center
Adequate for
10 years
Roof leaks,
fascia, parking
lot, restrooms
Security cameras Yes Functional, with targeted
maintenance needs
Fire Station
81 Adequate now
& future
Old wiring,
parking lot None No Strong condition; model reinvestment Fire Station
82 Inadequate,
undersized
Leaks, plumbing,
failing sheetrock,
makeshift
storage
Challenging
intersection, no
generator, poor
apron
Yes Critical replacement
needed
Fleet Shop Mixed, limited
Old wiring, no
restroom, no
parking
Issues being
addressed No Needs modernization and covered storage
Police
Department
Inadequate
now & future
Wiring, plumbing,
roof, siding,
inadequate
parking
Leaks, siding
issues Yes Critical replacement or major renovation
Public Works
Yard
Inadequate,
too small
Old house
unsuitable,
undersized shop,
no storage,
exposed
equipment
Poor location, no
fencing Yes Requires relocation/redevelopment
Town Hall Mixed (some
inadequate)
Old wiring,
HVAC, leaks, trip
hazards, poor
ADA access
Ingress/egress,
counter glass,
Clerk escape
route
Yes Functional but
increasingly obsolete
Themes across all facilities:
Aging Infrastructure: Multiple facilities suffer from outdated wiring, plumbing, and HVAC, creating both safety and operational challenges.
Space Limitations: Several buildings (Town Hall, Police, Fire Station 82, Public Works Yard) are undersized and cannot support future growth.
Deferred Maintenance: Leaks, damaged siding, and poor parking lots are repeated issues that harm both function and appearance.
Safety & Security: Concerns include mold, unsafe intersections, ingress/egress, and security upgrades.
Workforce Morale: Cramped layouts, poor natural light, and lack of amenities negatively affect staff in some facilities.
Recent Successes: Fire Station 81 and the Building Resiliency Center demonstrate how strategic investment improves capacity, safety, and morale. 317
With these survey results and themes in mind, the Ad Hoc Committee is seeking direction from the full Council on immediate and long term action.
Immediate Needs – Town Hall
Town Hall serves as the primary point of contact between the public and Town operations. Staff identified specific security vulnerabilities that warrant immediate attention, particularly as they relate to staff safety and public accessibility. These include the need for controlled access to the building, counter glass upgrades, and the addition of an emergency escape route from the Clerk’s Office.
It is recommended that the Council consider authorizing $50,000 for Town Hall security upgrades. This targeted investment will improve safety for staff and the public while longer-term facility planning is underway.
Strategic Facilities Planning – Master Plan vs. Parallel Projects Beyond short-term fixes, the survey reinforced the need for a comprehensive Facilities Master Plan to evaluate the long-term condition, capacity, and suitability of all Town facilities. Such a plan would help ensure that future investments are coordinated, cost-effective, and aligned with the Town’s recovery and growth objectives.
At the same time, two facilities — the temporary Corporation Yard and Fire Station 82 — were identified as critically deficient and beyond their useful lives. Staff recommend Council provide direction on whether:
1. To retain architectural/engineering firm(s) to prepare a Facilities Master Plan first, followed by design of a new Corporation Yard and Fire Station 82, ensuring full organizational coordination before initiating rebuilds; or
2. To streamline the process by proceeding in parallel, separating the Facilities Master Plan effort from the rebuilds of Corporation Yard and Fire Station 82, recognizing their urgent needs.
These decision considerations can balance near-term safety improvements, long-term strategic planning, and timely replacement of the Town’s most deficient facilities.
Financial Impact:
The Town of Paradise recently received a global settlement (structure and non-structure losses) from its insurance carrier in the amount of $6,565,450. These funds have been set aside in an individual account for the purposes of rebuilding the Corporation Yard, replacing Fire Station 82 and other facilities projects. The Town had previously been paid $2,774,292 for reconstruction costs of destroyed facilities. These funds have been comingled with the Town’s overall reserves.
Staff is recommending establishing a Long-Range Facilities Fund of $9,339,742 (transferring the initial $2,774,292 to G/L Account Number 7651.00.0000.3901.145). This Fund would be used for all short term, planning and construction activities the Town Council directs into the future, including potential initial $50,000 for Town Hall.
The establishment of a Long-Range Facilities Fund will ensure that all facility recovery and replacement efforts are accounted for transparently and tracked separately from General Fund reserves, allowing Council to prioritize projects over time as planning efforts mature. 318
Town of Paradise Facilities Inventory
Facility Listing
ID Site Address Size
(acres) Notes
1 5555 Skyway 1.78 Town Hall
2 6295 Skyway 1.39 Building Resiliency Center
3 5595 Black Olive Drive 1.39 Paradise Police Department 4 5631 & 5619 Black Olive Drive 0.24 Temporary Public Works Offices 5 767 Birch Street 0.60 Fire Station 81
6 767 Birch Street 0.14 Fleet Shop
7 925 & 933 American Way 4.80 PW Corporation Yard, Animal Shelter, Green Waste 8 5545 S Libby Road 0.12 Fire Station 82
ID Site Address Size
(acres) Notes
9 5456 Black Olive Drive 0.24 Burned “Jeffords Building” property 10 5657 Sierra Park Drive 0.44 Burned Quonset Hut property with sand 11 5625 Sierra Park Drive 0.32 Orphan property
12 5691 Black Olive Drive 0.18 Tax defaulted property under acquisition process 13 834 Fir Street 0.18 Tax defaulted property under acquisition process 14 5560 Berry Creek Drive 5.57 Property planned to be leased to PRPD 15 Dudley Lane 46.82 Joint property between stakeholders 16 1181 Pearson Road 4.80 Acquired post-Camp Fire
17 5733 Pentz Road 0.84 Burned residence for potential future Fire Station 82 18 1250 Wagstaff Road 0.47 Burned Station 83
19 Anchor Way TBD Newly discovered County “road” transfer Town Properties with Structures
Town Properties as Vacant Land
319
Town of Paradise Facilities Inventory
Facility Location Map
1 2
3, 4, 5, 6
14 8
9, 10, 11
12, 13
7 15
16 17
18 19
#
#
Structure
320 Vacant Land