Town of Paradise
Town Council Meeting Agenda
6:00 PM – February 10, 2026
Town of Paradise Council Chamber – 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA
Meeting Procedures
I. The Mayor is the Presiding Chair and is responsible for maintaining an orderly meeting. The Mayor calls the meeting to order and introduces each item on the agenda.
II. The Town staff then provides a report to Council and answers questions from the Council.
III. Citizens are encouraged to participate in the meeting process and are provided several opportunities to address Council. Any speaker addressing the Council is limited to three minutes per speaker - fifteen minutes per agenda item A. If you wish to address the Council regarding a specific agenda item, please complete a “Request to Address Council” card and give it to the Town Clerk prior to the beginning of the meeting. This process is voluntary and allows for citizens to be called to the speaker podium in alphabetical order.
Comments and questions from the public must be directed to the Presiding Chair and Town Council Members (please do not address staff.) Town staff is available to address citizen concerns Monday through Thursday at Town Hall between the hours of 8am and 5pm.
B. If you wish to address Council regarding an item not on the agenda, you may do so under Item 4, “Public Communication.” Again, please fill out a card and give it to the Town Clerk before the meeting. State Law prohibits Council action on items not listed on a public agenda.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance, persons who need special accommodations to participate in the Town Council meeting may contact the Town Clerk at least three business days prior to the date of the meeting to provide time for any such accommodation.
Interim Town Manager, Michael O’Brien
Town Attorney, Scott E. Huber
Town Clerk/Elections Official, Melanie Elvis
CDD, Planning & Onsite, Susan Hartman
CDD, Building & Code Enforcement, Tony Lindsey
Finance Director/Town Treasurer, Aimee Beleu
Public Works Director/Town Engineer, Marc Mattox
Division Chief, CAL FIRE/Paradise Fire, Jason Finney
Chief of Police, Eric Reinbold
Recovery & Economic Development Director, Colette Curtis Human Resources & Risk Management Director, Crystal Peters Information Systems Director, Luis Marquez
Mayor, Steve Crowder
Vice Mayor, Steve “Woody” Culleton
Council Member, Greg Bolin
Council Member, Heidi Lange
Council Member, Ronald Lassonde
1 1. OPENING
1a. Call to Order
1b. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America 1c. Invocation
1d. Roll Call
1e. Special recognition is awarded to sworn and non-sworn police personnel and volunteers for their exemplary contributions to the department. (Police Chief/Eric Reinbold)
Officer of the Year:
Officer John Newsom
Dispatcher of the Year:
Dispatcher Lorissa Parks
Civilian Employee of the Year:
Administrative Assistant Kelly Peirce
VIP of the Year:
Carol James
PASH Volunteer of the Year:
Lindy Brown
1f. Presentation by Blue Avenue.
1g. p6 Camp Fire Recovery Updates - Written reports are included in the agenda packet.
Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic Development Director - recovery projects, advocacy, economic recovery and development, communications, emergency operations and Housing updates.
Marc Mattox, Assistant Town Manager -infrastructure and sewer updates. 1h. p15 Paradise Sewer Project update by Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
One roll call vote is taken for all items. Consent items are considered to be routine business that does not call for discussion.
2a. p17 Approve minutes of the January 13, 2026 Special and Regular Town Council meetings. (Melanie Elvis/Town Clerk)
2b. p25 Approve January 2026 Cash Disbursements in the amount of $6,516,325.57. (Aimee Beleu/Finance Director)
2c. p33 Ratify the agreement with Baker Tilly US, LLP for Fiscal Year 2024/25 auditing services and authorize the Town Manager (or designee) to execute the agreement. (Aimee Beleu/Finance Director)
2d. p53 Ratify the Professional Services Agreement with Regional Government 2 Services (RGS), previously executed by the Interim Town Manager under 3 existing purchasing authority, in an amount not to exceed $99,000. (Aimee Beleu/Finance Director)
2e. p70 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___” A Resolution of the Town Paradise of the Town of Paradise Approving Job Classification Descriptions; and,
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ "A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Amending the Salary Pay Plan to include an Engineering Intern – Part Time, Temporary Position to the Salary Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 2025–2026; and, 3. Authorize staff to recruit and hire a temporary Engineering Intern for the period of early June 2026 through mid-August 2026. (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
2f. p78 Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___, “A Resolution of the Town Council of Town of Paradise accepting the work performed under the Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation Project - 2024, Contract 8407.2 CON performed by Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction.” (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
2g. p83 Concur with staff recommendation to file CEQA Notice of Exemptions for Maintenance Culvert Replacements on Roe and Scottwood Roads. (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
2h. p91 Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-__, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Approving an Application for Funding and the Execution of a Standard Agreement and any Amendments Thereto, and Certain Related Loan or Grant Documents and any Amendments Thereto, Related to the Award Made Pursuant to the Application Authorized by this Resolution Submitted in Response to a Direct Award.” (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
2i. p97 Concur with staff recommendation to file CEQA Notice of Exemption for Subsurface Investigation work to support Collection System design and Wastewater Treatment Facility site selection. (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
For matters that are not on the Council business agenda, speakers are allowed three (3) minutes to address the Council. The Town Council is prohibited from taking action on matters that are not listed on the public agenda. The Council may briefly respond for clarification and may refer the matter to the Town staff.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
6. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
Action items are presented by staff and the vote of each Council Member must be announced. A roll call vote is taken for each item on the action calendar. Citizens are allowed three (3) minutes to comment on agenda items.
6a. p109 Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026- ___, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Making Findings Concerning a Sole Vendor for Entering into Contract with BRINC Drones as First Responders 3 (DFR) Services – Sole Source. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Eric Reinbold/Police Chief)
6b. p116 1. Consider approving the Corrective Action Plan for the 2025 Building Division Audit with planned future updates quarterly; or, 2. Provide alternate direction. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager) 6c. p141 1. Review each committee identified above using the standardized governance questions during the meeting, with staff facilitating the discussion for consistency and clarity; and, 2. Approve the recommendation to sunset the Onsite Ad Hoc Committee effective immediately; and,
3. Provide direction that the standardized governance questions (Questions 1–6) be required each time: A. A new committee is established; or B. An existing committee is reaffirmed or modified; and, 4. Direct that the full Committee Inventory be reviewed annually at the time Council assignments are considered each December. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc
Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
6d. p172 Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-____, “ A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Awarding Construction Contract No. 8407.4 CON, Off-System Road Rehabilitation Project - 2026, to Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction in the amount of their base bid and designating authority to the Town Manager to Execute an Agreement with Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction and to approve contingency expenditures not exceeding 10%”. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager) 6e. p178 Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-___, “ A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Awarding Construction Contract No. 7303.6 CON, On-System Road Rehabilitation – Misc 2026/HSIP Systemic Intersection Safety Improvement Project, to Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction in the amount of their base bid and designating authority to the Town Manager to Execute an Agreement with Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction and to approve contingency expenditures not exceeding 10%”. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
6f. p185 Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-____ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Delegating Limited Authority to the Town Manager to Approve and Execute Final Right-of-Way Acquisition Documents for the Skyway-Pentz Intersection Improvements, Pentz Road Widening Project and Pentz Pathway Project Phase II”. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
6g. p191 1. Consider approving staff’s recommendation to select Studio W + TSK (design team) to provide professional planning and design services for the Town of Paradise Facilities Master Plan and Corporation Yard / Fire Station 82 project; and, 2. Authorize the Town Manager to enter into negotiations and execute an Agreement for Professional Services with Studio W+TSK for an initial not-to-exceed amount of $560,720, subject to approval by the Town Attorney; and, 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Designating Authority to the Town Manager to execute the Agreement and Associated 4 5
Task Orders for RFQ No. 2025-004, Facilities Master Plan and Corporation Yard/Fire Station 82 Planning-Design Services in a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $560,720.” (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Marc Mattox/Assistant Town Manager)
6h. p225 1. Consider approving the creation and authorization of a Workforce Development Program Coordinator position, limited to the life of the approved grant, to support day-to-day program implementation, partner coordination, outreach, and grant compliance for the Town’s grant-funded workforce development initiatives; and, 2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Approve Job Classification Descriptions”; and, 3. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___ “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Adopting an Amendment to the Salary Pay Plan to Include Workforce Development Program Coordinator for the Town of Paradise Employees for the Fiscal Year 2025/2026. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Colette Curtis/Recovery & Economic Development Director)
6i. p235 1. Consider reviewing and accepting the actuarial valuation of changes to the Paradise Firefighters Association retiree health benefits, as agreed in the Transitional MOU between the Town of Paradise and the Paradise Firefighters Association (PFA) approved by Town Council on September 11, 2012; or, 2. Refer the matter back to staff for further analysis and development. (ROLL CALL VOTE) (Aimee Beleu/Finance Director)
7. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS AND REPORTS
7a. Council initiated agenda items:
7a1. Discuss changing the name of the Town Council Chambers to the "Doug LaMalfa Town Council Chambers". (CROWDER)
7b. Council reports on committee representation
7c. Future Agenda Items
8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
8a. Town Manager Report
9. CLOSED SESSION - None
10. ADJOURNMENT
5 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 1(g)
ORIGINATED BY: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic
Development Director
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Monthly Recovery Update
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None
Background:
This report continues the Monthly Updates provided to keep the Town Council apprised of important developments related to the recovery of the Town of Paradise from the Camp Fire.
Included in this update are items related to recovery projects, advocacy economic recovery and development, communications and emergency operations.
Analysis:
ECONOMC DEVELOPMENT
CDBG-DR Economic Development
The Town of Paradise submitted an application for a Workforce Training Center, located on the Paradise High School campus.
The project is a partnership between the Town of Paradise, Butte College, PUSD, Valley Contractors Workforce Foundation, and Alliance for Workforce Development. At the December meeting, Council gave direction to move forward with the project with an amended scope.
An RFP was issued for an administrative contractor, a recommendation for award will be brought to Council at the March meeting.
An item is on the agenda tonight to hire a term employee for the duration of the grant.
Healthcare
The Town of Paradise and Adventist Health Feather River Foundation are working together to create a Strategic Healthcare Recovery Plan to assess current inventory, exiting gaps, projections, and a strategic plan for filling the gaps. The draft plan was presented to council at the October meeting. Based on Council feedback, staff worked with the consultants to provide an updated draft. The Healthcare Committee met to review the draft and the next step will be a meeting with medical professionals to review the draft for further input. It is anticipated that a draft will come back to Council for review at the March 2026 meeting.
6 Utility Box Mural Program
6 Utility boxes were wrapped with local artwork on Thursday July 31st. The locations are:
o Skyway/Neal (artist Libby Sofer)
o Oliver (artist Emily Wycoff)
o Pearson (artist Jenn Ponci)
o Elliot (artist Patti Lloyd)
o Maxwell (artist Shelley Miller)
o Black Olive (artist Steve Ferchaud)
Another call to artists was issued in October, with installation expected in Spring 2025.
Downtown Strategy Phase 3
Council approved moving forward on Phase 3 of the downtown strategy at the March 2025 meeting.
The working group has met several times, and has also visited several example sites such as Meriam Park, Mitote Food Park, The Barlow, and Oxbow Market. A roundtable discussion with developers was held in November 2025 The working group met to wrap up the findings from our work. Staff is working with UDA on the findings and recommendations. A draft plan will come to Council for review in the Spring.
RECOVERY
Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Mitigation Planning Public Services (CDBG DR MIT PPS)
Long Term Community Recovery Plan Update
o Council approved selection of UDA to conduct the update and draft the plan. o Staff is planning public outreach in coordination with planned General Plan Update work.
In Home Siren Units
o The Standard Agreement for funding for additional in-home siren units has been received, this will extend the number of units made available to residents with another 2,800 units available.
o Residents have begun receiving units from the FEMA funded grant, which are located at Town Hall for pickup.
o Town staff is advertising more widely now that additional units have been secured. Public Services
o Staff is working with HCD on the application for groups to become subrecipients to do mitigation work in Paradise.
o Applications are expected to be release in summer 2026.
Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation Grant
Town was awarded $739,680 through the Extreme Heat and Community Resilience Program
Funding will be used to create a Climate Resilience Plan which will identify prospective resiliency projects such as
o Community Evacuation/Cooling/Heating Centers
o Shade Tree Planting
o Fuels Reduction Projects
o Green space projects
The Town is partnered with RCAC to do public outreach and complete the plan by December 2026.
7 Identified projects may be eligible for future implementation funds through the same grant source.
The partnership agreement has been signed with partners RCAC, Paradise Recreation and Park District, and Campfire Collaborative.
A Core Project team has been formed which includes the partners listed above in addition to Fire Safe Council, Cal Fire, Chico State, and local tribes. The public input process started this month with an online survey, and we will hold public meetings in the coming months.
Overall Hazard Mitigation Project Update
Years of efforts are complete on the pre-award work on all our projects. All projects are fully approved and funded.
Category 4 Tree Removal Program
Project implementation is complete.
As of October, approximately 9.000 trees have been removed from 350+ parcels. 7-10 different tree removal crews are working across town in an efficient and effective partnership with property owners, local agencies, tribes, and contractors. Final wrap up and closeout is ongoing and a full report on the project will be provided to Council when complete.
Emergency Warning System
All 21 Towers are standing and operational.
21 of the 21 Towers are now fully complete.
All active construction is complete.
EWS Project has begun the closeout process.
In-Home Safe Units are now available for pickup at Town Hall for Paradise residents The February monthly test will be moved to Wednesday February 18th due to the holiday weekend on the 15th and the effort to get more Safe Units to residents for this test.
Residential Ignition Resistant Retrofit Program
Project is fully funded and moving forward.
All properties have been approved by FEMA to move forward to construction 65 Properties have selected their contractors and have had their "Notice to Proceed" Letters issued.
37 Properties have been fully completed.
Hazardous Fuels Reduction Program
Project is fully funded and moving forward.
Town staff are working with involved monitoring tribes on a plan and timeline for implementation.
Defensible Space Code Enforcement
The Defensible Space Code Enforcement project was fully approved and obligated in November 2023 by FEMA and CalOES.
8 Town Council approved implementation plan in January 2024. Grant funded staff have been hired and are in place and working in the community. In May a Notice of Intent was submitted to Cal OES to request an additional 3 years of funding for this program.
Our NOI was accepted and a full application was submitted in September. CalOES requested additional information in January 2026 as the grant application continues to move forward.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
CodeRed is experiencing a nation-wide outage. As a result, the County is moving to CodeRAVE for emergency notification services. The Town is working through the process of establishing this service.
Implementation for VEOCI, our online EOC software, is ongoing.
Financial Impact:
None.
9 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 1(g)
ORIGINATED BY: Nadia Alekseev, Housing Program Manager
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Housing Recovery Update
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None
Background:
This report provides the Town Council with an update of Housing Activities.
Analysis:
We have 42.37% of our pre-disaster housing stock to-date (1,720 surviving units + 3,827 new CofOs [an increase of 49 since last month] to-date = 5,547 habitable dwellings / 13,091 housing units before the Camp Fire). Our total number of habitable dwellings does not include the number of mobile homes replaced in mobile home parks because those permits are issued by HCD instead of the Building Dept., but mobile homes in parks are included in the total number of prefire housing units. An estimate from tax data shows 144 mobile homes in parks, or 5,691 housing units in Paradise.
Town of Paradise Owner-Occupied Rehabilitation/Reconstruction Program ($12.5 million) This program helps homeowners rehabilitate or reconstruct their home. The CalHome-Disaster Assistance grant was set to expire at the end of 2025, but the Housing Department was given verbal approval to extend the deadline to finish homes under construction. New applications to rebuild homes lost in the Camp Fire are no longer being accepted because it’s not feasible to complete a project before the expiration of the grant. Applications for essential home repairs on existing homes will continue to be accepted, funds for this activity are limited but do not have an expiration deadline.
69 homes completed
9 homes in construction
1 application in process
Town of Paradise First-Time Homebuyer Program ($11 million) Helping to make homeownership more affordable. Applicants who were Disaster Affected can qualify under higher income limits, using 120% of Area Median Income (AMI). Other funding remains available to assist non-disaster affected households earning no more than 80% AMI. 96 households assisted
8 applications in process
10 CDBG-DR Multifamily Rental Housing Program ($84.7 million) Affordable rental housing. Seven (7) projects are eligible for funding; a total of 292 units. CHIP project- scattered site (4 units)
o Leased up in Spring of 2024
Eaglepointe- 5975 Maxwell Dr (43 units)
o Leased up in Spring of 2025
Mayer Commons- 1561 Kay Ct (12 units)
o Construction completed. Units are being actively leased. For leasing information contact RSC Associates Property Management Inc.
Northwind Senior- 6983 Pentz Rd (21 units)
o Leased up in Fall of 2025
Cypress Family- 1633 Cypress Ln (70 units)
o Construction completed and Certificates of Occupancy were issued in December.
Units are being actively leased. Ribbon cutting is scheduled for April 10th, 2026. Clark Rd- 6480 Clark Rd (72 units)
o Notice to Proceed was issued by HCD. Loan closing was extended to March of 2026. Construction to begin shortly after.
Cypress Senior (phase II)- 1633 Cypress ln (70 units) o Loan escrow closed on December 9
th, and construction is scheduled to begin in
early 2026, weather permitting. Groundbreaking is scheduled for April 10th, 2026.
CDBG (2024 Annual Allocation=$47,069; unspent funds=$140,214.13) CDBG entitlement grants are on a 5-year plan cycle called the Consolidated Plan, and this year is the 5th year in the current plan. The final draft was submitted to HUD in July and is currently under review. The Town received an “untimely” designation due to an accumulation of funds greater than 1.5x the current year grant allocation. The substantial amendment was submitted and approved by HUD to reallocate $70,000 to an energy efficiency improvement program to spend this fiscal year. Applications are now available on the housing webpage or can be picked in person at the Housing Department window.
HOME Infill New Construction ($700,000)
Create affordable housing for first-time homebuyers. The grant award letter was finally received from HCD in April of 2025. Program guidelines are complete and were adopted by Council. Staff is continuing to work-out funding logistics with HCD.
Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) ($540,905)
Allocates matching funds to North Valley Housing Trust to administer for affordable housing projects.
A predevelopment loan of $400,000 has been made for the Cape Cod multi-family project ($200,000 of PLHA funds). Construction is expected to begin in early 2026. $75,000 of PLHA funds was loaned to build a small, single-family home, which was finished and sold to a low-income Camp Fire survivor. Housing staff is working with North Valley Housing Trust on another similar project.
PLHA operates on a 5-year funding cycle similar to CDBG. The NOFA for the next cycle is expected in the first quarter of 2026. PLHA allocates grant funds to CDBG entitlement cities, which the Housing staff will apply for, but will not have to compete with other communities to receive.
Financial Impact:
None.
11 1
TOWN OF PARADISE
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda No. 1(g)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Public Works Director / Town Engineer REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Camp Fire Recovery Updates - Infrastructure
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None, written monthly update only.
Background:
This report continues the Monthly Disaster Recovery Updates provided to keep the Town Council apprised of important developments related to the recovery of the Town of Paradise from the Camp Fire. Changes from the prior month’s reports are shown in red underline italics.
Analysis:
Road Rehabilitation
The Town of Paradise is endeavoring to pave nearly every public road mile by the end of 2026.
These projects are funded through Camp Fire Recovery Projects and are sequenced behind undergrounding of utilities and water service later replacements.
As of February 2026, the following paving progress can be reported:
Status Miles
Completed 72.10
Awarded/In-Progress 17.62
Planned Future 6.48
Total 96.19
Paradise Town Council has awarded three contracts for 2025 paving efforts, listed below with brief updates:
- Clark Road (Pearson to Wagstaff) – Knife River Construction - Project is in final punchlist phase.
- On-System Road Rehabilitation – All American Asphalt - Contract work is nearly complete with most work remaining consisting of punchlist or corrective adjustments - Off-System Road Rehabilitation – DeSilva Gates Construction - Punchlist items of work are underway with final completion expected in spring.
Engineering Division staff has successfully advertised the 2026 On- and Off-System Road Rehabilitation Projects. Council awards for both contracts are being recommended under separate agenda items.
12 2
A map of all paving efforts completed and planned can be found on the Town’s website at www.townofparadise.com by visiting “News and Announcements” from the homepage.
Capital Project Updates
The Public Works Department, in an effort to provide additional communications on various projects, has launched a new website under its ParadiseWORKS banner. ParadiseWORKS Engineering Resiliency now hosts individual project pages for current information, project descriptions and schedules. The website can be viewed here:
https://www.townofparadise.com/pwe/page/paradiseworks-engineering-resiliency Below is an abbreviated Project List intended to show the current status of each project. More information on each project’s scope and schedule can be found at. Typical project progressions and timeframes are as follows:
(1) Environmental, 6-24 months
(2) Design, 12 months
(3) Right of Way, 6-12 months
(4) Construction, 6-24 months
Project ID Project Title Project Phase
Anticipated
Construction
Completion Year
7303 On-System Road Rehabilitation Construction 2026
7307 Neal Road Rehabilitation Design 2028
8404 Camp Fire Hydrant Repairs Construction 2025
8407 Off-System Road Rehabilitation Construction 2026
9389 Pentz Pathway Project Phase II Design 2028
9390 Paradise ATP Gateway Project (Neal Road Class I) Environmental 2028 9391 Oliver Curve Pathway Phase I (Design Only) Design - 9394 Paradise Sewer Project Design -
9424 Skyway Link ATP (Bille to Wagstaff) Environmental 2027 9425 Upper Skyway Widening (Bille to Wagstaff) Environmental 2027 9426 Skyway/Pentz Intersection Improvements Environmental 2028 9427 Pentz Road Widening Environmental 2028
9428 Roe Road Phase 1 (Pentz to S. Libby) Environmental 2028 9430 Pearson-Hilltop Guard Rail Complete 2026
9433 Animal Shelter Expansion Construction 2025
9434 Roe Road Phase 2 (S. Libby to Clark) Environmental 2028 9438 Private Road Identification Safety Project Environmental 2028 9439 Storm Drain Resiliency Project Phase 1 Environmental 2028 9440 Storm Drain Resiliency Project Phase 2 Environmental 2028 Funding Pursuits
Below is a listing of active funding pursuits related to infrastructure recovery and status updates:
13 3
Program Project Title Amount
Requested
Anticipated
Award
Notification
Notes
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Paradise
Sewer Project
$2,000,000 of
$50,000,000
authorization
TBD
Town has started early
coordination for 2027 potential
appropriations
State Water
Board Septic to
Sewer CWSRF
Paradise
Sewer Project $27,000,000 TBD
Work to revise the project
application package is
resuming with new project
direction selected.
Active
Transportation
Project Cycle 8
Oliver Curve
Pathway $13,000,000 TBD
Program guidelines being
developed by CTC, anticipate
call for projects mid-2026.
14 1
TOWN OF PARADISE
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda No. 1(h)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Assistant Town Manager, Public Works Director / Town Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Paradise Sewer Project Update
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. None, written monthly update only.
Background:
This report is a monthly effort to provide additional opportunity for public engagement on the status and next steps of the Paradise Sewer Project.
Analysis:
Since its incorporation in 1979, the Town of Paradise has sought a centralized wastewater system to address failing septic systems that impact public health, groundwater quality, and economic development. The need for sewer service became even more urgent following the 2018 Camp Fire, when the lack of modern wastewater infrastructure emerged as a major barrier to rebuilding businesses, housing, and community resiliency.
In 2022, the Town secured $30 million in CDBG-DR funds to begin pre-construction work, including environmental review, design, and permitting. To provide technical expertise, HDR was retained as Owner’s Agent, and a progressive design-build team was selected to develop a Basis of Design Report. That effort confirmed that a locally managed, phased sewer project was necessary to achieve both affordability and long-term community needs.
In January 2025, the Town Council formed a Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate local treatment and collection alternatives, with strong emphasis on public engagement and cost feasibility. The Committee, working alongside staff, HDR, and the Paradise Irrigation District, conducted community meetings, stakeholder workshops, site tours of other wastewater systems, and a technical alternatives analysis.
In August 2025, the Town Council unanimously voted to concur with the Paradise Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee’s recommendation to direct a revised project description to include hybrid gravity/low pressure collection system, aerated lagoon wastewater treatment, and percolation/ evaporation pond effluent discharge.
Main Accomplishments
Internal Town staff review of Categorical Exemption for subsurface investigations. Execute professional services agreement with Carollo for Collection System and WWTF design.
Execute task order amendments with HDR for Environmental Services and Owner’s Agent design phase support.
15 2
Complete task order scope and fee negotiations with Carollo for Collection System and WWTF design services.
Participated in grant funding update meetings with USACE and DFA. Initiate AB52 Tribal consultations.
Ongoing preparation of Administrative Draft SEIR.
Key Activities (One Month Look-Ahead)
Execute task order agreements with Carollo for Collection System and WWTF design services.
Initiate preliminary design of Collection System and WWTF. Town Council adoption of Categorical Exemption for subsurface investigations. Initiate right of entry agreements for WWTF property subsurface investigations. Internal Town staff review of Administrative Draft Subsequent EIR. Initiate development of Public Draft Subsequent EIR.
Ongoing AB52 Tribal consultations.
16 MINUTES
PARADISE TOWN COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING – 5:30 PM – January 13, 2026
1. OPENING
The Special meeting of the Paradise Town Council was called to order by Mayor Crowder at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 5555 Skyway, Paradise, California who led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Greg Bolin, Steve “Woody” Culleton, Heidi Lange, Ronald Lassonde, and Steve Crowder, Mayor.
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Interim Town Manager Michael O’Brien, Town Attorney Scott E.
Huber, Town Clerk/Elections Official Melanie Elvis, Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox, and Information Systems Director Luis Marquez.
At 5:31 p.m. Mayor Crowder announced that the Town Council would adjourn to Closed Session for the following items:
2. CLOSED SESSION
2a. REAL PROPERTY. Pursuant to Gov. Code section 54956.8 the Council will meet with Real Property Negotiators, Town Manager and Town Attorney, regarding the following properties: APN 054-220-010, 050-052- 052, 050-052-095, 050-052-035, 053-272-088, 054-210-085, 054-210-062, 050-052-063 054-220-077, 054-210-103, 050-052-065, 050-082-105, 050- 082-104, 053-272-045, 053-240-046, 053-260-104, 053-250-009, 053-260- 099, 050-082-023, 053-272-095, 053-250-008, 054-210-015, 054-210-016, 054-220-057, 053-272-059, 053-260-081, 053-260-027, 053-250-007. The negotiators for the property owner(s) are unknown at this time. 2b. EXISTING LITIGATION. Pursuant to Gov. Code section 54956.9(a), the Town Council will meet with the Town Manager and Town Attorney regarding existing litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the Town is a party: Carol Sue Taylor v. Town of Paradise, et al. Butte County Superior Court Case Number 25CV00208. (520-20-201) After reconvening from Closed Session at 6:00 p.m., Mayor Crowder announced regarding item 2a: direction was given, no reportable action was taken.
Town Attorney Scott E. Huber announced the following action regarding item 2b: a motion was made by Council Member Bolin and seconded by Council Member Lassonde, to deny the application to submit a late claim. Roll call vote was unanimous in the affirmative to deny the application.
17 3. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Crowder adjourned the Council meeting at 6:01 p.m.
By: Attest:
___________________________ __________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
18 TOWN COUNCIL
Meeting Minutes
6:00 PM – January 13, 2026
1. OPENING
The Regular meeting of the Paradise Town Council was called to order by Mayor Crowder at 6:00 p.m. in the Town Council Chamber located at 5555 Skyway, Paradise, California who led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America. An invocation was offered by Council Member Crowder.
Mayor Crowder asked the Chambers to observe a moment of silence in remembrance of Congressman Doug LaMalfa.
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Greg Bolin, Steve “Woody” Culleton, Heidi Lange, Ronald Lassonde and Steve Crowder, Mayor
COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Interim Town Manager Michael O’Brien, Town Attorney Scott E.
Huber, Town Clerk/Elections Official Melanie Elvis, Community Development Director Susan Hartman, Community Development Director Tony Lindsey, Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox, Recovery and Economic Development Director Colette Curtis, Finance Director Aimee Beleu, Project Manager Brian Solecki, Police Chief Eric Reinbold Fire Chief Jason Finney, and Information Systems Director Luis Marquez. 1a. Camp Fire Recovery Updates - Written reports were included in the agenda packet: Colette Curtis, Recovery and Economic Development Director - recovery projects, advocacy, economic recovery and development, communications, emergency operations and Housing updates; and Marc Mattox, Assistant Town Manager -infrastructure and sewer updates. (110-60- 062)
1b. Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox provided an update on the Paradise Sewer Project. (960-70-009)
1c. Meeder Investment's Jim McCourt presented the quarterly investment report. (360-30-006)
Mayor Crowder read the following announcement regarding item 6e. Item 6(e) related to the consideration of the Corrective Action Plan will be pulled from the agenda this evening and will come back at the next Council Meeting. The Council will receive some additional information that will help them review and assess the Corrective Action Plan so that the Council Members will have all the relevant facts in front of them to make a determination 19 on this item. As such, this item will be pulled from the agenda, and no action will be taken tonight on this matter. We want to ensure this item is handled as thoughtfully and thoroughly as possible. This item will return at the February Council Meeting scheduled for February 10th.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION by Culleton, seconded by Bolin, approved consent calendar items 2a and 2b. Roll call vote was unanimous.
2a. Approved minutes of the December 9, 2025 Special and Regular Town Council meetings.
2b. Approved December 2025 Cash Disbursements in the amount of $10,189,845.38. (310-10-035)
3. ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR - None
4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
1. Earl Adams asked how he could get a replacement street sign after it was knocked down by PG&E undergrounding efforts.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
5a. Recovery & Economic Development Director Colette Curtis provided an overview of the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan.
Mayor Crowder opened the public hearing at 6:40 p.m.
There were no public comments.
Mayor Crowder closed the public hearing at 6:40 p.m.
Council conducted the duly noticed and published public hearing to solicit comments and/or suggestions regarding the 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan funding priorities. (710-10-111)
6. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
6a. Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox provided an overview of proposed Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery – Infrastructure Action Plan Amendment 4.
MOTION by Culleton, seconded by Lassonde, 1. Provided direction to assign the conditional CDBG-DR allocation of $13.5M to the Paradise Sewer Project; and, 2. Approved the Paradise Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery – Infrastructure Action Plan Amendment 4; and, 3. Adopted Resolution 2026-01 “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Canceling the Evacuation Route Permanent Changeable Message Sign Project Standard Agreement and Redirecting 20 Allocated Funds to Storm Drain Resiliency Project Phase 1”. Roll call vote was unanimous. (710-10-099)
6b. Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox provided an overview of the proposed Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers to complete design of the Paradise Sewer Project Collection System.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Lange 1. Concurred with staff’s recommendation to accept the amended and re-stated (formerly PDB contract) Professional Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers to complete design of the Paradise Sewer Project Collection System with a not to exceed amount of $4.5M; and, 2. Delegated authority to the Town Manager to approve individual task orders under the new Professional Services Agreement so long as they stay under authorized NTE; and,
3. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-02 “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise to Concur with the Paradise Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee’s Recommendation to Keep Carollo Engineers as the Designer for the Phase One Reduced Collection System and Enter into a Contract with them for the Remaining Design Work Related to this Scope of Work.” Roll call vote was unanimous. (510-20-490) (960-70-009) 6c. Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox provided an overview of the proposed increase to HDR’s Master Services Agreement for Owner’s Agent services through the start of construction of the Paradise Sewer Project.
MOTION by Lange, seconded by Culleton 1. Concurred with staff’s recommendation to increase the overall amount of the HDR Master Services Agreement from $5M to $9.5M for Owner’s Agent services through the start of construction of the Paradise Sewer Project and extend the expiration date of the MSA to December 31, 2029; and, 2. Delegated authority to the Town Manager to approve individual task orders under the Master Services Agreement as long as they stay under the total dollar amount of the MSA and with concurrence of the Paradise Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee; and, 3. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-03 “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise to Concur with the Paradise Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee’s Recommendation to Approve an Amendment to the Existing Master Services Agreement with HDR that Includes a $4.5M Increase to the Existing Not-To-Exceed Amount and a Time Extension to December 31, 2029.” Roll call vote was unanimous. (510- 20-382) (960-70-009)
6d. Assistant Town Manager Marc Mattox provided an overview of the proposed Agreement for Professional Services with Arbor Pros for the Hazardous Fuels Reduction project.
MOTION by Culleton, seconded by Lassonde 1. Concurred with staff’s recommendation to select Arbor Pros to enter into a one (1) year agreement with up to two (2) one (1) year extensions not to exceed three years to provide vegetation management and hazardous fuels reduction services 21 within the Town of Paradise right-of-way; and, 2. Directed staff to enter negotiations with Arbor Pros to reach and execute a funding-compliant agreement approved and executed by the Town Manager and Town Attorney; and, 3. Adopted Resolution 2026-04 “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise, Designating Authority to the Paradise Town Manager To Execute The Agreement for Professional Services and Individual Task Orders Under the Resultant Master Agreement for RFQ 7315 Hazardous Fuels Reduction Services, up to the Maximum Contract Aggregate Amount of $1.219M.” Roll call vote was unanimous. (510-20-492) (440-60-022)
6e. ITEM 6E WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA.
Council Member Lange recused herself from the dais relating to item 6f for any perceived conflict of interest.
6f. Community Development Director Susan Hartman provided an overview of proposed Ordinance No. 653 relating to backyard chicken and rabbit keeping.
Council Member Lassonde made a motion to increase the set back requirement from neighboring dwellings from 50’ to 75’. There was no second and the motion failed.
MOTION by Culleton, seconded by Bolin 1. Waived the second reading of the entire Town Ordinance No. 653 and approved reading by title only; and, 2. Adopted Town Ordinance No. 653, "An Ordinance Amending Text Regulations within Paradise Municipal Code Title 17 of the Paradise Municipal Code Relative to the Keeping of Backyard Chickens and Rabbits”.
AYES: Bolin, Culleton, Crowder; NOES: Lassonde; ABSENT: Lange; ABSTAIN: None (540-16-222) MOTION PASSES.
6g. Recovery & Economic Development Director Colette Curtis provided an overview of the proposed (RFP) to procure a contract with a compliance consultant to support project partners and the updated MOU with the Workforce Development project partners.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Lassonde 1. Approved a Request for Proposals (RFP) to procure a contract with a compliance consultant to support project partners with compliance and reimbursement requirements of Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) grant program; and, 2. Approved the amended MOU with the Workforce Development project partners, as presented. Roll call vote was unanimous. (710-10-104) (510-20-450)
6h. Recovery & Economic Development Director Colette Curtis provided an overview of the Utility Box Mural Project.
22 Council provided direction to staff to donate the original art from Phase 1 of the Utility Box Mural Project to the Paradise Art Center. All Council concurred. (1020-10-003)
6i. Finance Director Aimee Beleu provided an overview of the Unexpended Development Impact Fees report.
MOTION by Boin, seconded by Culleton, Adopted Resolution No. 2026- 05, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise, California, Reporting Unexpended Development Impact Fees in Accordance with Government Code Section 66006.” Roll call vote was unanimous. (740-10- 013)
6j. Finance Director Aimee Beleu provided an overview of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Financial Statement Audit Report.
MOTION by Bolin, seconded by Culleton, approved filing the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Financial Statement Audit Report, as submitted. Roll call vote was unanimous. (385-10-044)
7. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS AND REPORTS
7a. Council initiated agenda items – None
7b. Council reports on committee representation:
Council Member Bolin attended the monthly LAFCo meeting and the Solid Waste Committee meeting.
Council Member Lange attended the Butte County Fire Safe Council board meeting and annual summit, and Paradise Sewer Ad Hoc committee meetings.
Council Member Lassonde attended a Town Manager recruitment meeting.
Council Member Culleton attended the Solid Waste Committee meeting and the TOP/PRPD Liaison Committee meeting.
Mayor Crowder attended the Butte County Fire Safe Council annual summit, Paradise Sewer Ad Hoc committee meetings and participated in several news interviews regarding wildfire.
7c. Future Agenda Items:
1. Discuss consolidating local committees as well as assigning a chair to provide direction and momentum. (LANGE)
2. Rename the Town Council Chambers the “Doug LaMalfa Council Chambers” (CROWDER)
23 8. STAFF COMMUNICATION
8a. Interim Town Manager Michael O’Brien complimented staff on their hard work.
9. CLOSED SESSION - None
10. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Crowder adjourned the meeting at 8:08 p.m.
Date approved:
By: Attest:
_____________________________ ____________________________ Steve Crowder, Mayor Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
24 TOWN OF PARADISE
CASH DISBURSEMENTS REPORT
FOR THE PERIOD OF
January 1, 2026 - January 31, 2026
25 CASH DISBURSEMENTS REPORT
January 1, 2026 - January 31, 2026
Check Date Pay Period End Description Amount Total
1/2/2026 12/28/2025 Net Payroll - Direct Deposits and Checks $ 275,716.60 1/16/2026 1/11/2026 Net Payroll - Direct Deposits and Checks $ 278,876.58 1/30/2026 1/25/2026 Net Payroll - Direct Deposits and Checks $ 269,327.63 1/30/2026 1/30/2026 POA Audit $ 30,964.77
$ 854,885.58
Accounts Payable
Payroll Vendors: Taxes, PERS, Dues, Insurance, Etc. $ 504,618.15 Operations Vendors: Supplies, Contracts, Utilities, Etc. $5,156,821.84 TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE $ 5,661,439.99 GRAND TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS $ 6,516,325.57
APPROVED BY:
Aimee Beleu - Finance Director/Town Treasurer
APPROVED BY:
Michael O'Brien - Interim Town Manager
26 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
AP TCB - General Checking
Check
90756 01/06/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable ICMA 457 - MissionSquare $3,433.22 $3,433.22 $0.00 90757 01/06/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $656.29 $656.29 $0.00 90758 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable AIRGAS SAFETY, INC. $50.05 $50.05 $0.00 90759 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/16/2026 Accounts Payable ALHAMBRA $24.98 $24.98 $0.00 90760 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/07/2026 Accounts Payable Anaya, Andrew $494.50 $494.50 $0.00 90761 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable AT&T $87.46 $87.46 $0.00 90762 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/20/2026 Accounts Payable Bidwell Truck & Auto $1,830.94 $1,830.94 $0.00 90763 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/09/2026 Accounts Payable Brianna Ray $107.03 $107.03 $0.00 90764 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable Bureau Veritas North America, Inc $45,425.03 $45,425.03 $0.00 90765 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/21/2026 Accounts Payable BUTTE REGIONAL TRANSIT $150.25 $150.25 $0.00 90766 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable Calif Dept of Tax and Fee Administration
$43.54 $43.54 $0.00
90767 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/16/2026 Accounts Payable CHICO POWER EQUIPMENT $56.98 $56.98 $0.00 90768 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable Code 3 Technologies $4,321.85 $4,321.85 $0.00 90769 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable Cole Huber LLP $40,541.60 $40,541.60 $0.00 90770 01/07/2026 Voided Training Cancelled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable Cooper, Andrew $68.00 90771 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable Crossfire Tree & Vegetation Services $5,900.00 $5,900.00 $0.00 90772 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/20/2026 Accounts Payable De Lage Landen Public Finance LLC $781.25 $781.25 $0.00 90773 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY &
FIRE PROTECTION
$1,254,126.22 $1,254,126.22 $0.00
90774 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable Emblem Enterprises, Inc. $1,250.19 $1,250.19 $0.00 90775 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable Fastrak Bay Area Toll Authority $8.00 $8.00 $0.00 90776 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable FOOTHILL MILL & LUMBER $41.92 $41.92 $0.00 90777 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable FP/FRANCOTYP-POSTALIA
MAILING SOLUTIONS
$145.80 $145.80 $0.00
90778 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable Golden State Emergency Vehicle Service, Inc.
$275.52 $275.52 $0.00
90779 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORP. $304.52 $304.52 $0.00 90780 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable GREEN RIDGE LANDSCAPING $8,149.97 $8,149.97 $0.00 90781 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/20/2026 Accounts Payable Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP $40,875.00 $40,875.00 $0.00 90782 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable HDR Engineering, Inc $127,003.65 $127,003.65 $0.00 90783 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/21/2026 Accounts Payable HINDERLITER, DE LLAMAS & ASSOCIATES INC.
$2,042.51 $2,042.51 $0.00
90784 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/15/2026 Accounts Payable HLP, INC / CHAMELEON
SOFTWARE PRODUCTS
$3.15 $3.15 $0.00
90785 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable INTERSTATE OIL COMPANY $383.71 $383.71 $0.00 90786 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable JOHNNY ON THE SPOT
PORTABLES
$380.25 $380.25 $0.00
90787 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/16/2026 Accounts Payable KEN'S PARADISE HITCH &
WELDING
$965.70 $965.70 $0.00
90788 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable L.N. CURTIS & SONS $3,276.15 $3,276.15 $0.00 90789 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/15/2026 Accounts Payable LEAF Capital Funding LLC $143.55 $143.55 $0.00 90790 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable LIFE ASSIST INC $519.20 $519.20 $0.00 90791 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/16/2026 Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $581.20 $581.20 $0.00 90792 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 90793 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable NAPA Auto Parts $102.05 90794 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS $914.00 $914.00 $0.00 90795 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/15/2026 Accounts Payable Nichols-Melburg + Rossetto, AIA + Associates Inc
$1,800.00 $1,800.00 $0.00
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 1 of 6 Monday, February 2, 2026 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 1/1/2026 - To Payment Date: 1/31/2026 27 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90796 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable North State Tire Co. Inc. $287.33 $287.33 $0.00 90797 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable NORTHGATE PETROLEUM CO $5,287.51 $5,287.51 $0.00 90798 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $1,037.97 $1,037.97 $0.00 90799 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/09/2026 Accounts Payable Oakley, Matthew, Matthew, Oakley $494.50 $494.50 $0.00 90800 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/16/2026 Accounts Payable OFFICE DEPOT ACCT#36233169 $126.06 $126.06 $0.00 90801 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/08/2026 Accounts Payable PARADISE IRRIGATION DIST $2,206.65 $2,206.65 $0.00 90802 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/20/2026 Accounts Payable PARADISE POST $243.88 $243.88 $0.00 90803 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable RENTAL GUYS - CHICO $488.66 $488.66 $0.00 90804 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/15/2026 Accounts Payable Robinson, Lisa $949.52 $949.52 $0.00 90805 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable Spherion Staffing $6,843.70 $6,843.70 $0.00 90806 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable Tahoe Pure Water Co. $143.70 $143.70 $0.00 90807 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE $24.38 $24.38 $0.00 90808 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - ENG.
DEPT.
$172.84 $172.84 $0.00
90809 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - FIRE DEPT.
$36.28 $36.28 $0.00
90810 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE -
MOTORPOOL
$4.49 $4.49 $0.00
90811 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/16/2026 Accounts Payable THRIFTY ROOTER $230.93 $230.93 $0.00 90812 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/12/2026 Accounts Payable Tri Counties Bank $450.45 $450.45 $0.00 90813 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable Tri Flame Propane $481.82 $481.82 $0.00 90814 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable TUCKER PEST CONTROL INC $95.00 $95.00 $0.00 90815 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/15/2026 Accounts Payable Utility Associates, Inc. $6,342.30 $6,342.30 $0.00 90816 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/22/2026 Accounts Payable Axia Solar Corp $203.52 $203.52 $0.00 90817 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/13/2026 Accounts Payable Dan and April Hines $1,185.28 $1,185.28 $0.00 90818 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable Deppe, Adam $137.80 90819 01/07/2026 Reconciled 01/14/2026 Accounts Payable Gonzales , Steve $161.03 $161.03 $0.00 90820 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable Hopper, Patricia $15.00 90821 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable All-American Construction, Inc. $882,817.75 90822 01/09/2026 Reconciled 01/20/2026 Accounts Payable Aflac $57.98 $57.98 $0.00 90823 01/09/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable Met Life $14,178.19 $14,178.19 $0.00 90824 01/09/2026 Reconciled 01/20/2026 Accounts Payable OPERATING ENGINEERS $1,440.00 $1,440.00 $0.00 90825 01/09/2026 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE POLICE OFFICERS
ASSOCIATION
$2,643.16
90826 01/09/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable SUN LIFE INSURANCE $8,536.75 $8,536.75 $0.00 90827 01/09/2026 Open Accounts Payable SUPERIOR VISION SVC INC $965.26 90828 01/09/2026 Open Accounts Payable TOP CONFIDENTIAL MID MGMT
ASSOCIATION
$120.00
90829 01/20/2026 Open Accounts Payable ICMA 457 - MissionSquare $3,420.27 90830 01/20/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT $656.29 $656.29 $0.00 90831 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable ACCESS INFORMATION
PROTECTED
$371.21
90832 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable ADVANCED DOCUMENT
CONCEPTS
$6.07 $6.07 $0.00
90833 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable AIRGAS SAFETY, INC. $933.80 $933.80 $0.00 90834 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable ALL STAR TOWING $1,473.00 90835 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Alvies, Sheris $262.86 90836 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T $59,867.18
90837 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $135.94 90838 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $271.87 90839 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $102.81 user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 2 of 6 Monday, February 2, 2026 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 1/1/2026 - To Payment Date: 1/31/2026 28 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90840 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T & CALNET3 - CIRCUIT LINES $768.62 90841 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - REPEATER LINES $196.86 90842 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - COMMUNITY PARK
$30.32
90843 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - Summary $30.37 90844 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - Summary $3,366.48 90845 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T/CALNET3 - TH/FDPD FIBER LINES
$1,056.72
90846 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Baccala, Lauren $187.00 90847 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable Bear Electrical Systems, Inc $10,520.00 $10,520.00 $0.00 90848 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Blue Flamingo Marketing Advocates $114.89 90849 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB $110.00 90850 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable BPR Consulting Group $38,168.00 90851 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable BUTTE CO RECORDER $322.00 90852 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Butte County Construction Inc $30,800.00 90853 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Butte County Construction Inc $17,250.00 90854 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Butte County Construction Inc $11,800.00 90855 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE
$617.00 $617.00 $0.00
90856 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable Chico State Enterprises $7,875.00 $7,875.00 $0.00 90857 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable Cleanrite, Inc $1,914.63 $1,914.63 $0.00 90858 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Coastland $17,361.12 90859 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable CONTINENTAL BATTERY COMPANY $1,026.32 90860 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Crossfire Tree & Vegetation Services $2,771.55 90861 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable Desilva Gates Construction LLC $262,104.99 $262,104.99 $0.00 90862 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Elam IT, Jon, Elam $2,027.91 90863 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. $470.00 $470.00 $0.00 90864 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Enterprise Rancheria Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe
$43,443.75
90865 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Free Style Embroidery $288.38 90866 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable GREEN RIDGE LANDSCAPING $450.00 90867 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable HLP, INC / CHAMELEON
SOFTWARE PRODUCTS
$2,100.00
90868 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Howe Construction Tiger $34,675.00 90869 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable INTERSTATE SALES $975.98 $975.98 $0.00 90870 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Jennifer Arbuckle $3,750.00 90871 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Kimball Midwest $426.95 90872 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION $421.53 $421.53 $0.00 90873 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION $1,001,793.57 $1,001,793.57 $0.00 90874 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES $1,200.00 90875 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Kozak, Ginny $187.00 90876 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable KP Research Services, Inc. $1,250.00 90877 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable L.N. CURTIS & SONS $2,211.08 90878 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable LEAF Capital Funding LLC $274.05 90879 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Martin Construction $57,513.75 90880 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/22/2026 Accounts Payable MATTHEW'S ROOFING $22,698.00 $22,698.00 $0.00 90881 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Meyers Police K-9 Training, LLC $1,200.00 90882 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $90,240.00 90883 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/22/2026 Accounts Payable MID VALLEY TITLE & ESCROW $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 90884 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable MIKE GOGGIA TREE SERVICE $1,111.11 user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 3 of 6 Monday, February 2, 2026 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 1/1/2026 - To Payment Date: 1/31/2026 29 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90885 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORP $79.98 $79.98 $0.00 90886 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable NCCSIF TREASURER $33,289.75 $33,289.75 $0.00 90887 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable Norcal Food Equipment, Inc $222.50 $222.50 $0.00 90888 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable North State Construction $8,250.00 90889 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable North State Tire Co. Inc. $154.00 $154.00 $0.00 90890 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable NORTHERN RECYCLING & WASTE SERVICES, INC.
$3,375.97
90891 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable NORTHGATE PETROLEUM CO $7,731.63 $7,731.63 $0.00 90892 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable NORTHSTAR $2,210.00 $2,210.00 $0.00 90893 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable O'REILLY AUTO PARTS $116.60 $116.60 $0.00 90894 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable OFFICE DEPOT ACCT#36233169 $225.21 90895 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Pace Systems, Inc. $2,909.25 90896 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable PARADISE IRRIGATION DIST $74.52 $74.52 $0.00 90897 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable PARADISE POST $758.39 90898 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Peters, Habib, McKenna, JuhlRhodes & Cardoza, LLP$118.00 90899 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable PlaceWorks Inc $92,816.18 $92,816.18 $0.00 90900 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/22/2026 Accounts Payable Ridge Builders LLC $39,365.93 $39,365.93 $0.00 90901 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable Shelby's Pest Control, Inc. $110.00 $110.00 $0.00 90902 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Sigler Pest Control $50.00 90903 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Spherion Staffing $3,417.81 90904 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable STERICYCLE, INC. $569.75 90905 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Stratti $4,267.00 90906 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable SUN RIDGE SYSTEMS, INC. $29,337.00 90907 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Sure-Close INC $6,960.00 90908 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable T and S DVBE Inc. $555.90 $555.90 $0.00 90909 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/26/2026 Accounts Payable Tahoe Pure Water Co. $174.90 $174.90 $0.00 90910 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable The Ferguson Group $5,000.00 90911 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable The Pape' Group INC $325.49 90912 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE $70.21 90913 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - ENG.
DEPT.
$345.48
90914 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE - FIRE DEPT.
$6.82
90915 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable THOMAS ACE HARDWARE -
MOTORPOOL
$4.87
90916 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Top Notch Commercial Cleaning Inc. $3,800.00 90917 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable TransUnion Risk and Alternative Data Solutions Inc
$345.00
90918 01/22/2026 Voided Printer Error 01/22/2026 Accounts Payable Tri Counties Bank $21,561.40 90919 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Tri Flame Propane $476.06 90920 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $585.00 90921 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable UNICO Engineering, Inc. $433,980.40 90922 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Urban Design Associates. LTD $1,118.00 90923 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Utility Associates, Inc. $5,141.60 90924 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Voiance Language Services, LLC $20.01 90925 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Voltage Specialists $800.00 90926 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Ward, Dean $75.00 90927 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Ward , Scott $75.00 90928 01/22/2026 Reconciled 01/27/2026 Accounts Payable WITTMEIER AUTO CENTER $165.00 $165.00 $0.00 user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 4 of 6 Monday, February 2, 2026 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 1/1/2026 - To Payment Date: 1/31/2026 30 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
90929 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Zephyr Manufacturing $412.96 90930 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable ChainBreakers Group $86.12 90931 01/26/2026 Open Accounts Payable Meeks Lumber & Hardware $1,050.00 Type Check Totals: 176 Transactions $5,142,860.84 $3,286,859.65 $0.00 EFT
388 01/06/2026 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS - RETIREMENT $70,076.25 389 01/06/2026 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
$14,775.22
390 01/06/2026 Open Accounts Payable ING LIFE INS & ANNUITY COMPANY $7,885.22 391 01/06/2026 Open Accounts Payable INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $47,618.35 392 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable Amazon Capital Services $238.11 393 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $17.17 394 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $444.25 395 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $184.30 396 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable I.M.P.A.C. PAYMENTS IMPAC GOV
SVCS/US BANCORP
$1,987.56
397 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC $2,438.13 398 01/07/2026 Open Accounts Payable T MOBILE USA, INC. $2,094.31 399 01/09/2026 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS $186,189.71 400 01/15/2026 Open Accounts Payable Amazon Capital Services $533.07 401 01/20/2026 Open Accounts Payable CALPERS - RETIREMENT $69,724.53 402 01/20/2026 Open Accounts Payable EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
$15,348.35
403 01/20/2026 Open Accounts Payable ING LIFE INS & ANNUITY COMPANY $7,833.51 404 01/20/2026 Open Accounts Payable INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $49,059.60 405 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Amazon Capital Services $123.14 406 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable AT&T MOBILITY $107.00 407 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $429.25 408 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $444.25 409 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $219.25 410 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable COMCAST CABLE $434.25 411 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC $16,569.40 412 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable VERIZON WIRELESS $570.15 413 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable VERIZON WIRELESS $1,673.42 414 01/22/2026 Open Accounts Payable Tri Counties Bank $21,561.40 Type EFT Totals: 27 Transactions $518,579.15
AP TCB - General Checking Totals
Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 81 $1,834,371.79 $0.00
Reconciled 93 $3,286,859.65 $3,286,859.65
Voided 2 $21,629.40 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 176 $5,142,860.84 $3,286,859.65
EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 27 $518,579.15 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 27 $518,579.15 $0.00
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 5 of 6 Monday, February 2, 2026 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 1/1/2026 - To Payment Date: 1/31/2026 31 Number Date Status Void Reason
Reconciled/
Voided Date Source Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
Reconciled
Amount Difference
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 108 $2,352,950.94 $0.00
Reconciled 93 $3,286,859.65 $3,286,859.65
Voided 2 $21,629.40 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 203 $5,661,439.99 $3,286,859.65
Grand Totals:
Checks Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount Open 81 $1,834,371.79 $0.00
Reconciled 93 $3,286,859.65 $3,286,859.65
Voided 2 $21,629.40 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 176 $5,142,860.84 $3,286,859.65
EFTs Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 27 $518,579.15 $0.00
Reconciled 0 $0.00 $0.00
Voided 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 27 $518,579.15 $0.00
All Status Count Transaction Amount Reconciled Amount
Open 108 $2,352,950.94 $0.00
Reconciled 93 $3,286,859.65 $3,286,859.65
Voided 2 $21,629.40 $0.00
Stopped 0 $0.00 $0.00
Total 203 $5,661,439.99 $3,286,859.65
user: Aimee Beleu Pages: 6 of 6 Monday, February 2, 2026 Payment Register
TOWN OF PARADISE
From Payment Date: 1/1/2026 - To Payment Date: 1/31/2026 32 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(c)
ORIGINATED BY: Aimee Beleu, Finance Director/Town Treasurer REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Ratification of Agreement for Fiscal Year 2024/25 Auditing Services with Baker Tilly US, LLP
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Ratify the agreement with Baker Tilly US, LLP for Fiscal Year 2024/25 auditing services and authorize the Town Manager (or designee) to execute the agreement.
Background:
The Town is required to obtain an independent annual audit of its financial statements in accordance with applicable federal and state auditing standards. The agreement before Council provides auditing services for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025.
Pursuant to the Town’s Purchasing Policy, professional service contracts with a total value under $100,000 may be executed administratively. The attached agreement falls within this threshold; however, staff is bringing the item forward for ratification to ensure transparency and Council awareness.
Analysis:
The Town issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Fiscal Year 2024/25 auditing services on two separate occasions. In both instances, a single proposal was received from Baker Tilly US, LLP.
Baker Tilly is one of the nation’s largest public-sector auditing firms and submitted a thorough and well-qualified proposal demonstrating significant governmental auditing experience and capacity.
After evaluation, staff determined the proposal to be responsive, competitive, and in the best interest of the Town.
The agreement includes the option to extend the engagement for up to two additional fiscal years, subject to mutual agreement between the Town and the auditor. Any extension is not automatic and would be evaluated based on performance, cost, and the Town’s operational needs. If staff and Baker Tilly US, LLP agree to pursue an extension, the proposed extension would be brought to the Town Council for consideration and approval prior to execution.
Execution of the Fiscal Year 2024/25 audit agreement occurred later than is typical due to the timing of the Fiscal Year 2023/24 audit completion. The subsequent year’s agreement could not be finalized until the prior audit work was substantially complete and submitted. As a result, staff proceeded under the administrative authority provided by policy and is now requesting Council 33 ratification.
Financial Impact:
Total Base Audit Cost: $63,000
Financial Statement Audit and GANN Limit Review: $43,700 Single Audit (up to three major federal programs): $15,800 Annual State Controller Reports: $3,500
Additional Potential Costs
Additional Major Federal Programs: $7,500 per program for each major program in excess of three
Journal Entries: The audit includes up to ten journal entries necessary to materially state the financial statements; additional journal entries beyond ten may be billed at approximately $400 per entry
Travel and Lodging: Any required on-site work travel and lodging costs will be billed separately at actual cost
Costs associated with the auditing services are already budgeted in the current fiscal year for auditing services. Additional appropriations may be required as assessments are made if additional Major Federal Program reviews are needed.
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(d)
ORIGINATED BY: Aimee Beleu, Finance Director/Town Treasurer REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Ratify the Professional Services Agreement with Regional Government Services (RGS
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Ratify the Professional Services Agreement with Regional Government Services (RGS), previously executed by the Interim Town Manager under existing purchasing authority, in an amount not to exceed $99,000.
Background:
The Town of Paradise is currently undergoing its annual financial audit. As part of the prior audit process, certain findings and recommendations were identified that require immediate corrective action related to year-end closing procedures, internal controls, staff training, and the allocation and documentation of journal entries.
To address these items in a timely and effective manner, the Town engaged Regional Government Services (RGS), a public-sector joint powers authority that provides specialized financial and accounting services to local agencies. The agreement was executed by the Interim Town Manager under the authority granted by the Town’s Purchasing Policy, which allows administrative execution of professional services agreements within established limits when immediate operational needs exist.
Because the audit is actively underway, staff determined that delaying execution of the agreement until a future Town Council meeting would have hindered the Town’s ability to implement corrective actions during the current audit cycle. The agreement allows for immediate support to strengthen year-end close procedures, implement updated accounting practices, and provide targeted training to finance staff.
This item is being brought forward to the Town Council for ratification to ensure transparency and formal Council acknowledgment of the agreement.
Analysis:
Ratification of the Professional Services Agreement with Regional Government Services is necessary to allow continued implementation of corrective actions associated with the Town’s audit findings while the audit remains in progress. RGS is assisting staff with the development and implementation of updated financial procedures, training, and improved allocation and review of journal entries to ensure the Town’s financial records are accurate, complete, and welldocumented. 53 Immediate implementation of these services reduces the risk of audit delays, repeat findings, and compliance issues related to year-end financial reporting. Utilizing RGS allows the Town to address audit recommendations efficiently while also building internal staff capacity and strengthening long-term financial controls.
The agreement is structured as a month-to-month contract with a not-to-exceed amount, providing flexibility and cost control. Services are provided only at the Town’s request, and the agreement may be terminated with notice if no longer needed. Ratifying the agreement ensures continuity of audit support while preserving fiscal oversight and accountability.
Failure to ratify the agreement could disrupt audit completion, delay implementation of corrective actions, and increase the risk of future audit findings.
Financial Impact:
The Professional Services Agreement with Regional Government Services (RGS) is structured on an as-needed basis, with services provided only when requested by the Town. The agreement includes a not-to-exceed amount of $99,000, and there is no minimum service requirement or guaranteed expenditure.
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 69
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(e)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Budget Adjustment for a Part Time, Limited Term Engineering Intern
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes – Tier 1, Sewer
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___” A Resolution of the Town Paradise of the Town of Paradise Approving Job Classification Descriptions; and,
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2026-___” A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Amending the Salary Pay Plan to include an Engineering Intern – Part Time, Limited Term position to the Salary Pay Plan for Fiscal Year 2025–2026.
3. Authorize staff to recruit and hire a temporary Engineering Intern for the period of early June 2026 through mid-August 2026.
Background:
The Public Works/Engineering Department manages an active Capital Improvement Program and supports multiple infrastructure, transportation, and grant-funded projects. The summer months represent the Town’s peak construction and project delivery season.
During this period, Engineering staff also devote substantial effort to preparing and supporting grant applications for state and federal funding programs such as the Active Transportation Program.
The Town has previously utilized a temporary Engineering Intern position to provide short-term technical and administrative assistance during this high workload period while offering a valuable professional development opportunity to a civil engineering student.
Analysis:
Staff recommends establishing a temporary Engineering Intern position for Summer 2026 to assist with field data collection, construction support activities, and preparation of technical documentation related to capital projects and grant applications.
This position will provide operational support during the busiest portion of the construction season and enhance the Department’s capacity to meet project schedules and funding deadlines.
The proposed internship term would begin in early June 2026 and conclude in mid-August 2026. 70 The position would be temporary, non-benefited, and compensated at $22.00 per hour, up to 400 hours.
If approved, staff will initiate recruitment immediately in order to complete the hiring process prior to the start of the summer construction season.
Financial Impact:
The total cost of the temporary Engineering Intern position will depend on the number of hours worked during the internship period, however is estimated at $3,168 for FY 25/26 and $6,336 for FY 26/27. Funding for this position will be from General Fund allocations for the Engineering Division – with some time being reimbursed to applicable capital projects for work performed. 71 TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE
APPROVING JOB CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS
WHEREAS, it is prudent for the Town of Paradise to periodically review its job classification descriptions of the positions within the Town of Paradise; and WHEREAS, to improve efficiency of certain Town functions and to appropriately reflect the duties and qualifications of its employee classifications.
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise as follows:
SECTION 1. Job class descriptions in the attached list are approved. Town staff are directed to revise Town employee Classifications based on the attached list.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise this 10th day of February 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
NOT VOTING:
___________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
72 Job Classification Descriptions
Engineering Intern
73 February 2026
FLSA: Hourly
ENGINEERING INTERN (400 HOURS – PART-TIME, TEMPORARY)
DEFINITION
Under the direction of Engineering staff, perform a variety of engineering field related tasks.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
Receives general supervision from engineering staff including Capital Project Managers and Supervising Project Manager. Exercises no direct supervision over staff.
CLASS CHARACTERISTICS
This is an internship level classification responsible for assigned activities related to the Town’s Public Works Engineering Division. Responsibilities include the preparation of an update to the Town’s Engineering & Traffic Surveys, including data collection and analysis. This position will provide time shadowing project managers, visiting job sites, and gaining meaningful experience with consultants. The ideal candidates will have some experience with CAD/GIS, computer skills using Microsoft Suites, ability to research online, and great oral and written communication skills.
EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL JOB FUNCTIONS (Illustrative Only)
Management reserves the right to add, modify, change, or rescind the work assignments of different positions and to make reasonable accommodations so that qualified employees can perform the essential functions of the job.
Assists supervisor and department staff members with a variety of support duties as assigned Assists in researching, compiling, and analyzing data Prepares and/or processes routine reports, correspondence, and records Performs computer data entry to record and retrieve department information Interacts with interdepartmental staff and other agency representatives in obtaining or providing data
Performs routine clerical tasks as needed, including copying and filing documents, collating materials, etc.
Performs routine field reconnaissance and inspections as needed Picks up and delivers documents, materials, supplies, etc., as needed Prepare plans and drawings as directed by supervisor and department staff members Performs related duties as assigned
QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
Business English, spelling and grammar; modern office practices, procedures and equipment; personal computer operations; AutoCAD; Microsoft Office Suite, specifically Word and Excel; basic math principles; effective public relations/customer service principles, practices and techniques. 74 Engineering Intern
Ability to:
Utilize general office equipment such as telephone, fax, printers, copiers, and computers; learn and apply City policies, procedures, rules and regulations; conduct basic research, research, compile and analyze data and prepare accurate reports and correspondence; reason logically, draw valid conclusions and make appropriate recommendations; maintain work effectiveness and meet deadlines with frequent changes in workload and the priority of assignments; understand and carry out oral and written instructions; communicate clearly and concisely, orally and in writing; establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work; provide quality customer service.
Education and Experience:
Any combination of training and experience that would provide the required knowledge, skills, and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the required qualifications would be:
Preferred: Must be currently enrolled in an Undergraduate Civil Engineering Program (Sophomore or Junior level).
Accepted: Must be currently enrolled in a collegiate program with a focus in Civil Engineering courses Licenses and Certifications:
Must possess a valid US driver’s license upon date of application. Must obtain California driver’s license following hire date per California DMV regulations.
PHYSICAL DEMANDS
Must possess mobility to work in a standard office setting and use standard office equipment, including a computer, to inspect Town development sites, including traversing uneven terrain, climbing ladders, stairs, and other temporary or construction access points, to operate a motor vehicle, and to visit various Town and meeting sites; vision to read printed materials and a computer screen; and hearing and speech to communicate in person, before groups, and over the telephone. This is primarily a sedentary office classification although standing and walking between work areas and to conduct inspections may be required. Finger dexterity is needed to access, enter, and retrieve data using a computer keyboard or calculator and to operate standard office equipment. Positions in this classification occasionally bend, stoop, kneel, reach, push, and pull drawers open and closed to retrieve and file information. Employee must possess the ability to lift, carry, push, and pull materials and objects weighing up to 25 pounds.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Office environment with moderate noise levels, controlled temperature conditions and no direct exposure to hazardous physical substances.
Employees may work in the field and occasionally be exposed to loud noise levels, cold and hot temperatures, inclement weather conditions, road hazards, vibration, mechanical and/or electrical hazards, and hazardous physical substances and fumes.
Employees may interact with upset staff and/or public and private representatives in interpreting and enforcing departmental policies and procedures.
75 TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 26-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING AN AMMENDMENT TO THE SALARY PAY PLAN
FOR TOWN OF PARADISE EMPLOYEES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-2026 WHEREAS, the Town wishes to revise the salary pay plan; and WHEREAS, the salary pay plan will incorporate all salary paid within the Town into one salary pay plan.
NOW, THEREFORE be it resolved by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise, that the Town of Paradise salary pay plan attached to this resolution is hereby adopted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise on this 10th day of February 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
NOT VOTING: None
_________________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
By: ____________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Scott Huber, Town Attorney
76 Head
Count Auth FTE's Budget FTE
Hours/
Week
A
Step
B
Step
C
Step
D
Step
E
Step
F
Step
1.00 0.20 0.20 ENGINEERING INTERN (Temporary, up to 400 hours) HOURLY 40 22.00 - - - - -
TOWN OF PARADISE
SALARY PAY PLAN FY 2025/26
Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Position
Title
77 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(f)
ORIGINATED BY: Jessica Erdahl, Supervising Project Manager REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Accept Construction Contract – Off-System Road Rehabilitation Project - 2024
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes, Tier 1
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Adopt Resolution No. 2026- , “A Resolution of the Town Council of Town of Paradise accepting the work performed under the Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation Project - 2024, Contract 8407.2 CON performed by Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction.”
Background:
Due to the ongoing recovery effort and debris removal operations within the Town and Butte County, the Town’s off-system roadway infrastructure sustained heavy damage in the wake of the Camp Fire. The pavement structural sections were damaged in two ways:
1. Pavement Scarring due to Car Fires – On the day of the Camp Fire, several motorists were required to abandon their vehicles and continue evacuating on foot. The subsequent car fires damaged the pavement, justifying the need for repair.
2. Pavement structural section damage due to heavy truck traffic – Following the Camp Fire, the Town experienced a staggering level of truck traffic. During the CALOES Debris Removal effort, over 3.7 million tons of material was removed, equivalent to approximately 300,000 truckloads.
During that same period, PG&E, Comcast, and AT&T restored their damaged distribution infrastructure. Additionally, PG&E removed over 92,000 trees, and an additional 100,000 trees were removed in 2020 as part of the Hazard Tree Removal Program. The volume of trucks using the Town’s off-system roads has resulted in damage to the pavement structural section, justifying the need for rehabilitation.
The Town coordinated with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to secure Public Assistance permanent restoration funding to repair damaged off-system roads town wide.
Through the Public Assistance Program, the Town of Paradise has been approved for $38,290,000 for the off-system road rehabilitation project. The approved project is located on “OffSystem” roads. Off-system roadway rehabilitation include roadways that are not on the on-system roadways and will be funded by FEMA.
On November 10, 2020, Paradise Town Council awarded master on-call contracts to Mark Thomas, Dokken Engineering, GHD, Inc., Wood Rodgers, Inc. and Dewberry Drake Haglan to perform on-call professional civil engineering services for a variety of local, state, and federallyfunded projects. Subsequently, in January 2021, task orders were issued to GHD, Dokken 78 Engineering, and Dewberry to perform civil design services on the off-system road rehabilitation project.
The overall scope of work for the Project can be summarized as follows:
Repair Camp Fire damaged off-system roads to achieve a pre-fire condition.
On August 17, 2023 Paradise Town Council awarded Contract No 8407.1.CON, 2023 Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation (Project 1 - 12.41 miles) to Hat Creek Construction and Materials in the amount of their base bid plus additive bid #1,$5,756,809.
On May 14, 2024 Paradise Town Council awarded Contract No 8407.2.CON, 2024 Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation (Project 2 – 13.66 miles) to Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction in the amount of their base bid $7,565,944.94.
On March 11, 2025 Paradise Town Council awarded Contract No 8407.3.CON, 2025 Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation (Project 3 – 19.61 miles) to DeSilva Gates Construction LLC in the amount of their base bid $11,520,520.
Analysis:
Construction efforts began on August 19, 2024 and the project was substantially completed on May 16, 2025.
Financial Impact:
FEMA Public Assistance funds have been authorized for construction and construction engineering phases at actual documented cost incurred.
The total estimated construction cost of the Project, including a 10% contingency, was $8,322,539 at contract award. The actual total construction cost is $8,988,020. Actual expenditures exceeded projected cost by $665,480 and are due to additional driveway conforms and road rehabilitation treatment changes due to poor subgrade conditions discovered in the field during construction.
Project expenditures are detailed below:
Off-System Road Rehabilitation Project – 2024/Contract No. 8407.2 CON Contract 8407.2
CON
Total
Total Part. Cost
FEMA/ CDBG-DR
Match
6.25%
Non-Part.
Utility
Non-Part.
LTF
Non-Part.
BCAG Estimated Cost CalOES
93.75%
Construction
Project 2 - 2024 $8,988,020 $8,830,345 $8,278,449 $551,897 $50,400 $20,094 $87,180 Construction
Management $800,000 $800,000 $750,000 $50,000
Total $9,788,020 $9,630,345 $9,028,449 $601,897 $50,400 $20,094 $87,180 Attachments:
A. Resolution
B. Notice of Completion
79 1
TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF TOWN OF PARADISE ACCEPTING
THE WORK PERFORMED UNDER THE OFF-SYSTEM ROADWAY REHABILITATION PROJECT - 2024, CONTRACT 8407.2 CON PERFORMED BY BALDWIN CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. DBA KNIFE RIVER CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise has heretofore contracted with Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction for certain work performed under that certain project known as the Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation Project – 2024, being Contract No. 8407.2 CON; and WHEREAS, said work of improvements, as called for by the contract between the Town of Paradise with Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction, referable to said project was substantially completed on May 16, 2025 to the satisfaction of the Town; and
WHEREAS, there has been posted a bond insuring the work of improvements from a maintenance standpoint for a period of one year from and after acceptance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise that it hereby accepts the work performed on those certain improvements, the subject of a contract between the Town of Paradise and with Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction, known and referred to as the Off-System Roadway Rehabilitation Project – 2024, being Contract No. 8407.2 CON.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise on this 10
th day of February 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
By:
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
80 RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
TOWN OF PARADISE
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
TOWN CLERK
TOWN OF PARADISE
5555 SKYWAY
PARADISE, CA 95969
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice is hereby given:
1. The undersigned is Owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.
2. The full name of the undersigned is Town of Paradise, a Municipal Corporation
3. The full address of the undersigned is 5555 Paradise, California 95969
4. The nature of the title of the undersigned is: IN FEE
5. The full names and full addresses of all persons, if any, who hold such interest or estate with the undersigned as joint tenants or as tenants in common are:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
6. The names of the predecessors in interest of the undersigned, if the property was transferred subsequent to the commencement of the work or improvements herein referred to:
NAMES ADDRESSES
None
7. A work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was substantially completed on May 30, 2025
8. The name of the original contractor, if any, for such work of improvement is Baldwin Contracting Company, Inc. dba Knife River Construction
9. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the Town of Paradise, County of Butte, State of California, and is described as follows:
Off-System Road Rehabilitation Project – 2024/Contract No. 8407.2 CON
10. The street address of said property is Various Roads, Paradise, CA (If no street address has been officially assigned, insert “None.”) Dated: February 10, 2026 Signature of Owner
named in Paragraph 2:
TOWN OF PARADISE
By:
Michael O’Brien
Interim Town Manager, Town of Paradise
81 VERIFICATION
I, the undersigned say:
I am the Town Manager for the Town of Paradise, agent for the owner of the aforesaid interest or estate in the property described in the above notice:
I have read the foregoing notice and know and understand the contents thereof, and the facts stated herein are true and correct.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on February 10, 2026 at Town Hall, Town of Paradise, Paradise, California.
TOWN OF PARADISE
Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
Project Name: Off-System Road Rehabilitation Project – 2024/Contract No. 8407.2 CON
82 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(g)
ORIGINATED BY: Jessica Erdahl, Supervising Project Manager REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Maintenance Culvert Replacement Project CEQA
Determination
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes, Tier 1 – Evacuation Routes
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Concur with staff recommendation to file CEQA Notice of Exemptions for Maintenance Culvert Replacements on Roe and Scottwood Roads.
Background:
Staff identified 2 locations with deteriorated corrugated metal pipe culverts requiring in-kind replacement ahead of the 2026 Off-System Road paving operations. The locations and culvert details are as follows:
Roe Road (east of Scottwood Rd) - 42 LF of 48-inch corrugated metal pipe culvert Scottwood Road (south of Roe Rd) - 35 LF of 36-inch corrugated metal pipe culvert The culvert bottoms have rotted out, and absent repair would result in roadway damage and flooding due to the deteriorated condition of the existing culverts. Both locations convey water from a channel that may be considered waters of the United States and could have US Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344) and Federal Regulations (33 CFR 323.4(a)(2)), certain discharges for Maintenance have been exempted from requiring a Section 404 permit. In order to qualify for the Clean Water Act Section 404(f) exemptions as “Maintenance Activities,” the existing culvert would need to be replaced with in-kind material and capacity.
For efficiency this project will be bid and constructed with the 2026 Off-System Road Rehabilitation project.
Analysis:
The current phase for this project is environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The CEQA process requires the lead agency to examine the project proposal and evaluate potential impacts. Staff have evaluated the subject project thoroughly and found that the project is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines Section (c), Existing Facilities which states:
The project is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines [Section 15301(c)], which states:
83 “Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The types of “existing facilities” itemized below are not intended to be all-inclusive of the types of projects which might fall within Class 1. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of use. Examples include but are not limited to:
Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety), and other alterations such as the addition of bicycle facilities, including but not limited to bicycle parking, bicycle-share facilities and bicycle lanes, transit improvements such as bus lanes, pedestrian crossings, street trees, and other similar alterations that do not create additional automobile lanes).” The Town of Paradise proposes to complete in-kind replacements of corrugated metal pipe culverts on Roe and Scottwood Roads, ahead of the 2026 Off-System Road paving operations.
Erosion and corrosion have caused pipe failure. Replacement will prevent roadway damage and flooding due to the deteriorated condition of the existing culverts, and will ensure essential evacuation routes during emergencies. The existing culverts would be replaced in-kind and with equivalent sized piping and falls within the Clean Water Act Section 404(f) exemptions as “Maintenance Activities.” The removed roadway section above the replaced culvert pipe will be restored to its original condition. The project will result in no expansion of use of an existing facility.
No further environmental review is necessary for this project.
Based on CEQA Section 15301(c), staff is requesting the Council to concur with and approve for filing the Notice of Exemptions with the Butte County Recorder’s Office. If approved, the environmental phase will be completed in March 2026. Construction is anticipated to be completed with the 2026 Off-System Road Rehabilitation project, slated to start in April 2026.
A draft of the Notice of Exemption for each location is attached to this staff report.
Financial Impact:
The total estimated construction cost of the project with a 10% contingency is $52,023 and will be paid from local drainage funds. The estimated expenditure breakdown by location is shown below.
Estimate Construction Cost
Location Estimated Cost
Roe Road $22,869
Scottwood Road $29,154
Total Cost $52,023
There is a recording fee of $50 per project with the Butte County Recorder’s Office to file the Notice of Exemption.
Attachments:
A. Roe Road CEQA Notice of Exemption
B. Project Map Location – Roe Road
C. Scottwood Road CEQA Notice of Exemption
D. Project Map Location – Scottwood Raod
84 1
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk-Recorder
Butte County
155 Nelson Avenue
Oroville, CA 95965
From: Public Works Department
Town of Paradise Posted:_______ through _______
5555 Skyway (date) (date)
Paradise, CA 95969
Project Title: ROE ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Project Location: Town of Paradise, Butte County, CA. See attached project location map.
Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): Town Rights of Way, Roe Road 250 LF east of Scottwood Road.
Project Description: The Town of Paradise within Butte County, California proposes to remove and replace existing 48” corrugated metal pipe culvert in-kind and restore the roadway sections above the pipe at Latitude: 39.741188, Longitude:
-121.621042.
Lead Agency: Town of Paradise
Applicant: Town of Paradise, 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA 95969 Exemption Status: Ministerial [Section 21080(b); 15268]; Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)];
Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)];
General Rule [Section 15061(b)(3)];
Categorical Exemption [Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities]; Approval of Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges [Section 21080(b)(8)(D)]; Statutory Exemption [Section 15273(a)(4)].
REASONS WHY THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT OR DOES NOT REQUIRE FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION:
The project is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines [Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities], which states:
The following emergency projects are exempt from the requirements of CEQA. “Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The types of “existing facilities” itemized below are not intended to be all-inclusive of the types of projects which might fall within Class 1. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of use. Examples include but are not limited to:
(C) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety), and other alterations such as the addition of bicycle facilities, including but not limited to bicycle parking, bicycle-share facilities and bicycle lanes, transit improvements such as bus lanes, pedestrian crossings, street trees, and other similar alterations that do not create additional automobile lanes);” The purpose of the project is to replace in-kind an existing corrugated metal pipe culvert. The project will result in no expansion of use of an existing facility. No further environmental review is necessary for this project.
By __________________________________ Date ______________________ Marc Mattox, Public Works Director
Town of Paradise
DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING
85 2
DECLARATION OF FEES DUE
(California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF LEAD AGENCY/APPLICANT:
Town of Paradise
Public Works Department
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
(530) 872-6291
Project: ROE ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
☒ A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$50.00 (Fifty Dollars) Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED
☐ A. Negative Declaration
$2,968.75 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
☐ B. Mitigated Negative Declaration
$2,968.75 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
☐ C. Environmental Impact Report
$4,123.50 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
3. ☐ OTHER (Specify) General Rule Exemption
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
THREE COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
ALL APPLICABLE FEES MUST BE PAID AT THE TIME OF FILING ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
THE $50.00 HANDLING FEE IS REQUIRED PER FILING IN ADDITION TO THE FILING FEE SPECIFIED IN FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711.4(d).
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO COUNTY OF BUTTE.
86 !.
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community ±
0 100 200
Feet
TOWN OF PARADISE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
5555 Skyway Road
Paradise, California 95969 J ERDAHL
DECEMBER 2025
PROJECT
LOCATION
MAP
Legend
!. Roe Road Culvert
MMAAIINNTTEENNAANNCCEE CCUULLVVEERRTT
RREEPPLLAACCEEMMEENNTT PPRROOJJEECCTT
RROOEE RROOAADD
48" CMP Culvert
Lat: 39.741188
Long: -121.621042
87 1
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk-Recorder
Butte County
155 Nelson Avenue
Oroville, CA 95965
From: Public Works Department
Town of Paradise Posted:_______ through _______
5555 Skyway (date) (date)
Paradise, CA 95969
Project Title: SCOTTWOOD ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Project Location: Town of Paradise, Butte County, CA. See attached project location map.
Assessor’s Parcel Number(s): Town Rights of Way, Scottwood Road Project Description: The Town of Paradise within Butte County, California proposes to remove and replace existing 36” corrugated metal pipe culvert in-kind and restore the roadway sections above the pipe at Latitude: 39.739944, Longitude: - 121.621989.
Lead Agency: Town of Paradise
Applicant: Town of Paradise, 5555 Skyway, Paradise, CA 95969 Exemption Status: Ministerial [Section 21080(b); 15268]; Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)];
Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)];
General Rule [Section 15061(b)(3)];
Categorical Exemption [Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities]; Approval of Rates, Tolls, Fares, and Charges [Section 21080(b)(8)(D)]; Statutory Exemption [Section 15273(a)(4)].
REASONS WHY THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT OR DOES NOT REQUIRE FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION:
The project is exempt under State CEQA Guidelines [Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities], which states:
The following emergency projects are exempt from the requirements of CEQA. “Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The types of “existing facilities” itemized below are not intended to be all-inclusive of the types of projects which might fall within Class 1. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of use. Examples include but are not limited to:
(C) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety), and other alterations such as the addition of bicycle facilities, including but not limited to bicycle parking, bicycle-share facilities and bicycle lanes, transit improvements such as bus lanes, pedestrian crossings, street trees, and other similar alterations that do not create additional automobile lanes);” The purpose of the project is to replace in-kind an existing corrugated metal pipe culvert. The project will result in no expansion of use of an existing facility. No further environmental review is necessary for this project.
By __________________________________ Date ______________________ Marc Mattox, Public Works Director
Town of Paradise
DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING
88 2
DECLARATION OF FEES DUE
(California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF LEAD AGENCY/APPLICANT:
Town of Paradise
Public Works Department
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
(530) 872-6291
Project: SCOTTWOOD ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT
CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT:
1. NOTICE OF EXEMPTION/STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
☒ A. Statutorily or Categorically Exempt
$50.00 (Fifty Dollars) Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
2. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION - FEE REQUIRED
☐ A. Negative Declaration
$2,968.75 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
☐ B. Mitigated Negative Declaration
$2,968.75 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
☐ C. Environmental Impact Report
$4,123.50 State Filing Fee
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
3. ☐ OTHER (Specify) General Rule Exemption
$50.00 Butte County Clerk's Filing Fee
THREE COPIES OF THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITH ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
ALL APPLICABLE FEES MUST BE PAID AT THE TIME OF FILING ANY ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS WITH THE BUTTE COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE.
THE $50.00 HANDLING FEE IS REQUIRED PER FILING IN ADDITION TO THE FILING FEE SPECIFIED IN FISH AND GAME CODE SECTION 711.4(d).
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO COUNTY OF BUTTE.
89 !.
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community ±
0 100 200
Feet
TOWN OF PARADISE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
5555 Skyway Road
Paradise, California 95969 J ERDAHL
DECEMBER 2025
PROJECT
LOCATION
MAP
Legend
!. Scottwood Road Culvert
MMAAIINNTTEENNAANNCCEE CCUULLVVEERRTT
RREEPPLLAACCEEMMEENNTT PPRROOJJEECCTT
SSCCOOTTTTWWOOOODD RROOAADD
36" CMP Culvert
Lat: 39.739944
Long: -121.621989
90 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(h)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: CDBG-DR Infrastructure Urgent Need Resolution
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026-__, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Approving an Application for Funding and the Execution of a Standard Agreement and any Amendments Thereto, and Certain Related Loan or Grant Documents and any Amendments Thereto, Related to the Award Made Pursuant to the Application Authorized by this Resolution Submitted in Response to a Direct Award.” Background:
On January 27, 2020, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published Federal Register Notice 85 FR 4681 allocating $1,017,399,000 in CDBG-DR funding, related to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Major Disaster Declarations DR-4382 from July to September 2018 and DR-4407 in November 2018. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is the grantee responsible for administering the CDBG-DR funds allocated to the State of California. CDBG-DR supports the State of California’s unmet recovery needs related to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Major Disaster Declaration DR-4382 from July to September 2018 and DR-4407 in November 2018.
Recognizing unmet infrastructure recovery needs, related to DR-4382 from July to September 2018 and DR-4407 in November 2018, HCD allocated $317,428,488 of the CDBG-DR funding to the Disaster Recovery Infrastructure Program (DR-Infrastructure). DR-Infrastructure projects are funded to assist with meeting the unmet infrastructure needs of local communities. This program provides funding for FEMA Public Assistance (PA) match projects, FEMA Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) match projects, other non-FEMA match projects, and stand-alone projects identified by local communities impacted by DR-4382 or DR-4407.
On February 8, 2022, Paradise Town Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-12, a resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise declaring certain projects critical to Camp Fire recovery with unfunded needs for consideration in the CDBG-DR Infrastructure Program (DR-4407).
On August 19, 2022, the Town of Paradise was formally notified by California Housing and Community Development that of the $317M made available for allocations, the Town would be recipients of $199,592,735.75 for implementation of identified projects in the program.
On September 15, 2022, The Town of Paradise Town Council approved a proposed Action Plan for the allocation of funding received through the CDBG-DR Infrastructure Program. 91 On October 11, 2022, the Town of Paradise adopted a specific resolution relating to the $199,592,735.75 allocation for various infrastructure projects.
On December 13, 2022, The Town of Paradise approved a proposed Action Plan Amendment 1 for the allocation of funding received through the CDBG-DR infrastructure Program.
On January 9, 2024, The Town of Paradise approved a proposed Action Plan Amendment 2 for the allocation of funding received through the CDBG-DR infrastructure Program.
On April 8, 2025, The Town of Paradise approved a proposed Action Plan Amendment 3 for the allocation of funding received through the CDBG-DR infrastructure Program.
On January 13, 2026, The Town of Paradise approved a proposed Action Plan Amendment 4 for the allocation of funding received through the CDBG-DR infrastructure Program.
Analysis:
Due to an increase in funding in the CDBG-DR Infrastructure program an updated authorizing resolution is required.
As a component of the administration of CDBG-DR Infrastructure funding, the Town of Paradise is required to adopt a resolution for specific items including designation of authorized staff to enter into, execute, and deliver agreements and any and all subsequent amendments, thereto, with the State of California.
Financial Impact:
The aggregate amount of funding allocated to the Town of Paradise has increased from $199,592,735.75 to $225,000,000.00.
Attachments:
A. Resolution
92 1
TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING AND THE EXECUTION OF A
STANDARD AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND
CERTAIN RELATED LOAN OR GRANT DOCUMENTS AND ANY
AMENDMENTS THERETO, RELATED TO THE AWARD MADE PURSUANT
TO THE APPLICATION AUTHORIZED BY THIS RESOLUTION SUBMITTED
IN RESPONSE TO A DIRECT AWARD
BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council, the “Governing Body,” of the Town of Paradise, the “Applicant,” as follows:
SECTION 1:
The Governing Body has reviewed and hereby approves the submission to the State of California of one or more application(s) in the aggregate amount, not to exceed, of $225,000,000.00, in response to the CDBG-DR 2018 CDBG-DR Infrastructure (DR-INF) direct award issued from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (the “Department”).
SECTION 2:
The Applicant acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public participation requirements in the development of its application(s).
SECTION 3:
The Town Council hereby authorizes and directs the Town Manager or designee, Public Works Director/Town Engineer, to enter into, execute, and deliver the Standard Agreement and any and all subsequent amendments, thereto, with the State of California for the purposes of the Grant.
SECTION 4:
The Governing Body hereby authorizes and directs the Town Manager (the “Application Authorized Signer”), or Designee, Public Works Director/Town Engineer (the “Application Designated Signer”) to execute and deliver all applications and act on the Applicant’s behalf in matters pertaining to all such applications.
SECTION 5:
If an application is approved, the Governing Body hereby authorizes and directs the Town Manager (the “Standard Agreement Signer”), or Designee, Public Works Director/Town Engineer (the “Standard Agreement Designated Signer”) to enter info, execute and deliver any and all agreements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Department, including but not limited to the Department’s Standard Agreement and any amendments thereto, and any and all other documents necessary or appropriate to evidence or secure the 93 2
funding to be received by Applicant, and any and all subsequent amendments thereto (collectively, the “Award Documents”).
If the Authorized Signer in this Section 4 is not the mayor, the pursuant to Government Code 40601 and 40602, the Governing Body must attach its applicable ordinance designating that this Standard Agreement Authorized Signer has the authority on behalf of the mayor. The applicable ordinance is #2.40.070.
SECTION 6:
If an application is approved, the Governing Body herby authorizes and directs the Town Manager (the “Funds Request Signer”), or Designee Public Works Director/Town Engineer (the “Funds Request Designated Signer”) to sign and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of California from time to time in connection with the grant.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise on this 10 th day of February 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
By:
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Town of Paradise
94 3
I, Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk of the Town of Paradise, State of California, hereby certify the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted at a duly passed and adopted on the date stated thereon and that said Resolution has not been amended, modified, repealed, or rescinded since the date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of this date, February 10, 2026.
________________________________________
Melanie Elvis, Town Clerk of the Town of Paradise,
State of California
By: _____________________________________
Name and Title*
2.04.070 - Powers and duties.
The town manager shall be the administrative head of the government of the town under the direction and control of the town council, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. He shall be responsible for the efficient administration of all the affairs of the town which are under his control. In addition to his general powers as administrative head, and not as a limitation thereon, it shall be his duty and he shall have the powers 95 4
set forth in Sections 2.04.080 through 2.04.210. (Ord. 81 § 1 (part), 1983: Ord. 58 § 8 (part), 1982)
96 Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 2(i)
ORIGINATED BY: Colin Nelson, Capital Projects Manager
REVIEWED BY: Marc Mattox, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Paradise Sewer Project, Subsurface investigation CEQA Determination; Categorical Exemption
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes, Tier 1, Sewer Project
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Concur with Staff recommendation to file CEQA Notice of Exemption for Subsurface Investigation work to support Collection System design and Wastewater Treatment Facility site selection.
Background:
The Town of Paradise has long sought a centralized wastewater treatment solution to address failing septic systems, protect groundwater, and support commercial and multi-family development. Following the 2018 Camp Fire, the need for essential infrastructure has become critical to the Town’s recovery and long-term resilience.
In 2022, the Town secured approximately $30 million in Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Planning funds to advance environmental review, design, rightof-way, and permitting for the Paradise Sewer Project. HDR was retained as the Town’s Owner’s Agent, and Carollo Engineers was selected as the design engineer for the collection system and the proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF).
On January 21, 2025, Town Council directed staff to modify the project approach from a regional connection to the City of Chico to a locally operated wastewater treatment facility and to evaluate phased implementation strategies. On August 14, 2025, Council selected a preferred alternative consisting of a hybrid gravity and low-pressure collection system and a local WWTF utilizing aerated lagoons with land-based effluent disposal.
To advance final design and select a WWTF site, the project team must conduct subsurface investigations, including geotechnical testing, environmental site assessments, and utility potholing. These activities are limited to data collection and are subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Analysis:
The current phase of the Paradise Sewer Project is environmental review and preliminary design development. In order to complete collection system design and select a site for the proposed Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF), the project team must conduct limited subsurface 97 investigations. These activities include geotechnical borings, test pits, percolation testing, environmental site assessments (Phase I and Phase II), seismic refraction surveys, and utility potholing within the proposed project alignment and at candidate WWTF sites.
The purpose of the subsurface investigation work is solely to collect geotechnical, environmental, and utility data to inform project design and site selection. This action does not approve construction of the sewer system or WWTF, nor does it commit the Town to a specific project alternative.
Staff has reviewed the scope of the proposed subsurface investigations and determined that the activities qualify for a Class 6 categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15306. Class 6 exemptions apply to basic data collection, research, and resource evaluation activities that do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource and are undertaken for information-gathering purposes prior to project approval.
The proposed work consists of a limited number of small-diameter borings and shallow test pits, temporary potholes to locate existing utilities, and surface soil sampling. Each investigation location would disturb only a small area, and all boreholes and test pits would be backfilled and restored upon completion. Work will be conducted within existing roadways, disturbed areas, or previously developed sites to the extent feasible, and will comply with Town encroachment permit requirements, traffic control standards, and applicable safety regulations.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 identifies exceptions under which a categorical exemption cannot be used. Staff has evaluated each exception and determined that none apply to this project for the following reasons:
Location (Sensitive Environmental Resources): Environmentally sensitive areas, including biological and cultural resource locations, have been identified on the project maps. Subsurface investigation activities will avoid these areas, and no work will occur within mapped environmentally sensitive zones. Therefore, the project will not impact resources of hazardous or critical concern.
Cumulative Impact: There are no other projects of the same type occurring in the same locations that would result in a significant cumulative environmental impact. The proposed investigations are limited, temporary, and not part of a series of successive similar actions.
Significant Effect (Unusual Circumstances): There is no reasonable possibility that the proposed activities would result in a significant environmental effect due to unusual circumstances. The work involves minor surface disturbance, is temporary in nature, and will be restored following completion.
Scenic Highways: No portion of the project is located within or adjacent to a highway designated as a State Scenic Highway.
Hazardous Waste Sites: The project is not located on a site included on any list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.
Historical Resources: The project will avoid known cultural and historical resource areas.
In the event that previously unknown resources are encountered, work will cease and appropriate discovery protocols will be implemented.
98 Based on the limited scope of disturbance, the temporary nature of the work, and the avoidance of environmentally sensitive areas, staff finds that the proposed subsurface investigation activities meet the requirements for a Class 6 categorical exemption under CEQA and that none of the exceptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply.
Financial Impact:
The subsurface investigation work described in this action is already included within the scope of services and budget authorized by Town Council under existing agreements with Carollo Engineers for the Wastewater Treatment Facility design and the Collection System design.
All costs associated with the geotechnical investigations, environmental site assessments, and utility potholing are funded through the Town’s $30 million Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Infrastructure Planning grant. These activities are part of the previously approved design contracts supported by this grant funding.
No additional appropriations or budget amendments are required as a result of this action. 99 Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
_______________________________________________
Print Form
Notice of Exemption Appendix E
To: Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency): ____________________________ P.O. Box 3044, Room 113 _______________________________________________ Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 County Clerk
(Address)
___________________________
___________________________
County of: __________________
Project Title: ____________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: ________________________________________________________________________ Project Location - Specific:
Project Location - City: ______________________ Project Location - County:
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project:
_____________________
Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _____________________________________________________ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ________________________________________________ Exempt Status: (check one):
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Reasons why project is exempt:
Lead Agency
Contact Person: ____________________________ Area Code/Telephone/Extension: _______________ If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a Notice of Exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes No Signature: ____________________________ Date:
Signed by Lead Agency Signed by Applicant
Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Date Received for filing at OPR:
Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. _______________
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: ____________________________________ ______________________________________________
______________ Title: _______________________
Revised 2011
Town of Paradise
155 Nelson Avenue
Paradise Sewer System Geotechnical and Other Investigations Town of Paradise
Paradise Butte
Town of Paradise
Town of Paradise
X
5555 Skyway
Paradise, CA 95969
Butte
Oroville, CA 95965
The project would conduct geotechnical and other investigations of proposed sites for a wastewater treatment plant and collection pipelines. The investigations would include test borings at the proposed sites, along with an Initial Site Assessment, soil sampling, and utility potholing. The information obtained would be used for the design and eventual construction of a sewer system for the Town of Paradise, which currently has no such system. See attachment for project details.
Town of Paradise and adjacent unincorporated Butte County Class 6, Sec. 15306
The project is geotechnical and utility investigations, including test borings, soil samplings, and utility potholings, of proposed sites for a sewer system in Paradise that includes a wastewater treatment plant and collection pipelines. The borings, samplings, and potholings are part of data gathering for the design and eventual construction of the sewer system. These activities would disturb only a limited area of land, both at the activity sites and overall. Environmentally sensitive areas containing biological and cultural resources would be avoided. See attachment for description of proposed activities. 100
Attachment – Project Description
Paradise Sewer Project Geotechnical and Other Investigations The Town of Paradise (Town) proposes to construct and operate a new sewer system, which would include a new Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) and a collection system within the Town. The proposed sewer project is being evaluated under a separate and comprehensive California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis; however, the Town proposes to complete necessary subsurface geotechnical investigations, along with an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) and Phase II testing and utility potholing to inform site selection and support establishing design criteria.
The geotechnical investigations, ISA, and potholing would occur in locations of the proposed facilities, including the Collection System and the WWTF. Specific activities proposed within each of these components that have potential impacts on the physical environment are described below.
Collection System
Geotechnical Investigations
Geotechnical subsurface explorations and sample testing would be performed along the pipeline alignments to characterize their soil properties. These explorations would classify soil type; determine rock hardness; measure groundwater depth, if observed; and analyze corrosiveness. These factors would inform the design of the pipeline and possible actions to implement during installation.
Prior to starting field work, a pre-investigation would include reviewing existing geotechnical/geologic information, conducting a geotechnical desktop study, and reviewing soil/rock/groundwater information obtained for the project. The exploration program would consider access, traffic control, and geologic conditions. Underground Service Alert (USA North 811) would be completed, and access to exploration locations would be determined. Permits would be obtained from Butte County Environmental Health for borings and wells, and encroachment permits for borings within/adjacent to the public right-of-way would be obtained from Butte County and the Town of Paradise, depending on the jurisdiction affected.
The Town proposes up to 30 borings to assess the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions along the alignments indicated in Figure 1. The borings would include:
• 25 borings along the pipeline from the downtown collection system to the WWTF location.
101
• 5 borings along the collection system alignment downtown.
The exploratory borings would be conducted at approximately 700-to 1,000-foot intervals along the collection system pipeline alignments, to depths of approximately 15 to 30 feet or until refusal. Soil cuttings from auger borings would be stored in 55-gallon drums and tested for soil contamination. Soil drums would be stored on Town-owned property while testing is performed. Once soil testing is complete, the soil would be legally disposed.
Up to 15 seismic refraction surveys would be conducted in areas where shallow hard rock is expected (i.e., less than 10 feet below ground surface). The seismic refraction survey measures acoustic velocity, which can be correlated to primary wave velocities, which would be used to estimate how excavatable the area would be.
Pre-investigation and permitting are anticipated to begin in the winter/spring of 2026 upon approval of this CEQA categorial exemption. Subsurface explorations are anticipated to begin in spring 2026 after the pre-investigation.
Initial Site Assessment
The ISA serves to determine if the proposed collection system pipeline footprint crosses through areas of contaminated soil that require special handling and disposal during construction. The Phase I ISA would be conducted to identify evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) within or adjacent to the proposed project alignment, and evaluate if these conditions have the potential to impact the project design or implementation costs. The Phase I ISA would be performed according to ASTM E1527-21 and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards.
Phase II environmental soil sampling would be conducted along approximately 24,000 lineal feet of surface roadway. Soil samples would be collected from up to 27 sample locations (see Figure 1) and tested for the presence of hazardous materials. Sample locations would be spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart on alternating sides of the roadway. At each sample location, soil samples would be collected from approximately 0 to 6 inches, 12 to 18 inches, and 24 to 30 inches below ground surface. Samplers would collect samples using a hand auger (no power equipment) and decontaminate the sampling equipment between sample locations.
It is assumed that at least some of the existing concrete sidewalks, gutters, and curbing would be impacted by the sewer piping installation. Up to 10 samples of concrete along the project alignment would be collected and analyzed for asbestos.
It is anticipated that the Phase I ISA process would begin in winter or spring 2026 after the approval of this categorical exemption and the Phase II process would begin in summer 102
2026, with results feeding into the ongoing Paradise Sewer Project design and environmental clearance.
Utility Potholing
Utility potholing is performed to measure vertical depth of existing utility pipelines and to record existing pipe parameters (e.g., size, material, crossing direction) where existing utilities are crossing the proposed collection system pipeline alignment. The Town would complete up to 100 utility potholes along the project alignment down to the proposed Skyway South WWTF site. Potholing would occur where existing utilities cross the proposed sewer pipeline alignment. Efforts would include identifying the utility type as marked by USA, location, depth, size, and material type. Work would be performed in batches as potholing progresses.
It is assumed that individual potholes would be no greater than 10 feet below surface. It is further assumed that average utility depth would be 5 feet. A surveyor would survey pothole locations marked by the pothole crew and record the depth indicated. Six site visits are assumed for pothole surveys.
Utility potholing is expected to begin in fall 2026.
Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF)
There are currently two proposed WWTF sites as shown on Figure 2: one outside the western Town limits south of the Skyway (Skyway South), and the other partially within and partially outside of the western Town limits along the Skyway (Skyway Crossroads).
Geotechnical investigations at both sites would aid in the selection of a site. The ISA and utility potholing, if necessary, would occur only at the site selected for WWTF construction.
Environmentally sensitive areas would be avoided on both WWTF sites.
Geotechnical Investigations
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigations at Potential WWTF Sites Proposed geotechnical investigations at the Skyway South and Skyway Crossroads WWTF sites would each include:
• Up to 4 seismic refraction surveys to further define bedrock depths at the potential treatment facility (up to 8 total at both sites).
• Up to 6 test pits using a backhoe up to 15 feet deep or until refusal is reached to classify subsurface soils and rock (up to 12 total at both sites). • Up to 4 percolation tests between 5 to 10 feet deep to determine infiltration rates (up to 8 total at both sites).
103
Underground utilities would be marked prior to field visits. The overburden soil would be classified, thickness measured, and samples collected for lab testing that would be completed on select samples. Soil cuttings from auger borings and/or soil from test pits would be stored in 55-gallon drums and tested for soil contamination. Soil drums would be stored either at the site (pending property owner approval) or on Town-owned property while testing is performed. Once soil testing is complete, soil would be legally disposed.
A prepared study would provide the results of the geotechnical investigations. The results would be incorporated directly into the Paradise Sewer Project design and environmental review processes. Upon completion of the study, a WWTF site would be selected for further investigation.
The Preliminary Geotechnical Study process, including field review observations and study preparation, is scheduled to begin in winter 2026 after approval of this CEQA categorical exemption.
Geotechnical Investigations at Selected WWTF Site
Upon selection of the WWTF site by Town staff, the following additional field investigations would be conducted to obtain additional site-specific design parameters:
• 8 seismic refraction surveys to further define bedrock depths. • 6 test pits using a backhoe up to 15 feet deep or until refusal is reached to classify subsurface soils and rock.
• 4 percolation tests between 5 to 10 feet deep to determine infiltration rates. • 5 borings between 5 and 20 feet deep near the proposed WWTF structures.
The overburden soil would be classified, thickness measured, and samples collected for lab testing (to be completed on select samples). Seismic parameters per the California Building Code would be established.
The field investigations are scheduled to begin in spring 2026.
Initial Site Assessment
As with the Collection System, the ISA would determine if the selected WWTF site contains areas of contaminated soil that require special handling and disposal during construction.
The Phase I ISA would be conducted to identify evidence of RECs within the WWTF site, and evaluate if these conditions have the potential to impact the project design or implementation costs. The ISA would be performed according to ASTM E1527-21 and Caltrans standards.
104
Phase II environmental soil sampling would be conducted at the selected WWTF site at locations determined by the ISA.
Utility Potholing
If existing underground utilities are encountered at the selected WWTF site, up to five potholes may be completed to further characterize the utilities. Potholing on the WWTF site would be conducted in a similar manner to potholing in the Collection System area.
Justification for Categorical Exemption
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15306, describes the Class 6 categorical exemption. Class 6 consists of basic data collection, research, experimental management, and resource evaluation activities, which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource. These may be strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or funded.
The purpose of the project is to gather geotechnical and other information that would be used for the design of a proposed Town of Paradise sewer system. The Town has not yet adopted a final plan for this sewer system, as its final design is dependent on information to be gathered by this project. The proposed borings, soil samplings, and utility potholing would occur only at specific locations. Individually and collectively, these activities would not disturb substantial areas of land and therefore would not generate significant environmental impacts.
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2(a), notes there are exceptions to the use of a categorical exemption, with one exception specific to the Class 6 exemption. These exceptions are listed below, along with the reasons why these exceptions would not apply to this Class 6 categorical exemption:
• Location on Which a Project Is Proposed Is a Particularly Sensitive Environment. If a project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern, where it is designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies, then the Class 6 exemption would not apply.
Environmentally sensitive areas are identified on Figure 2. These are areas where initial surveys found either biological or cultural resources that should be avoided at this time, as they are potentially protected by federal, state, or local statutes and regulations. Activities associated with the project would not be conducted within these environmentally sensitive areas. Therefore, the Class 6 categorical exemption would remain applicable to this project.
105
• Cumulative Impact. All exemptions are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place is significant over time.
There are no other projects of the same type that would occur in the Town of Paradise. Therefore, no cumulative impact is associated with this project. • Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant impact on the environment due to unusual circumstances. As noted, the project would have minimal impact at each activity site. Also, as discussed above, the project would avoid designated environmentally sensitive areas. No unusual circumstances were identified that could lead to a significant environmental impact by the project. • Scenic Highway. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project that may result in damage to scenic resources, within a highway officially designated as a State Scenic Highway. No such highways have been designated in the project area. • Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site that is included on any list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No such sites were identified within the project area. • Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.
As discussed above, the project would avoid designated environmentally sensitive areas, which include cultural resource sites.
Summary
The project proposes to gather geotechnical and other information for the purpose of designing and ultimately constructing the Town of Paradise sewer system. Activities associated with the project, such as borings, soil sampling, and potholing, would not cause significant environmental impacts and would avoid designated environmentally sensitive areas. No exceptions to the use of this categorical exemption were identified. Therefore, this project meets the requirements for a Class 6 categorical exemption under CEQA. 106
Figure 1 – Conceptual Subsurface Investigation Site Plan –Collection System 107
Figure 2 – Conceptual Subsurface Investigation Site Plan – Wastewater Treatment Facility 108
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 6(a)
ORIGINATED BY: Eric Reinbold, Police Chief
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Drones as First Responders (DFR) – Sole Source
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No.
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2026- ___, “A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Paradise Making Findings Concerning a Sole Vendor for Entering into Contract with BRINC Drones as First Responders (DFR) Services – Sole Source. (ROLL CALL VOTE)
Background:
The Paradise Police Department is committed to providing timely and efficient service to our citizens and guests to our community.
As our community continues to grow, the Town of Paradise police services have also increased to match the needs of its citizens. The Town of Paradise incorporates just over 18 square miles.
Due to the many canyons and gullies, it can take a police officer more than 10 minutes from one end of town to the other when responding to calls for service or assisting another officer. Our current staffing levels are quickly used up on one or two incidents (depending on the level of danger and risk).
In the year 2023, the Paradise Police department logged 11,313 calls for service. In the year 2024, the Paradise Police department logged 14,710 calls for service. This past year, 2025, The Paradise Police Department Dispatch logged 16100 calls for service. This is where drones as first responders (DFR) can assist.
Within the Town of Paradise, it takes emergency resources upwards of 10 minutes to cross town.
With the use of DFRs, remote observers can have eyes on an incident within two minutes, anywhere in town. That means quicker and more accurate intel for responding units.
Furthermore, with this rapid intel, decision makers can better assess what resources are needed.
There are many vendors offering DFR service, but only one can deliver what our community needs. BRINC was founded by a young engineer that wanted to build lifesaving technology for first responders. Motivated by the tragic events of the 2017 Las Vegas mass casualty incident, Blake Resnick felt compelled to create tools and resources that would allow responding first responders the ability to reduce risk and increase safety. Additionally, BRINC is committed to building US made products, keeping in line with federal policies and forecasts. 109
Here are a few benefits the BRINC DFR program can bring:
Faster Response Time: Drones can be deployed and on scene within two minutes Provide Advance Situational Awareness: Because the response time is improved, lifesaving observations can be made prior to boots on the ground Promote Officer and Community Safety: Because officers have early observations, they can proceed safer and more aware of the situation.
Help to De-Escalate Situations: Due to the advanced intel, decision makers can deploy other resources and tools quicker to create a safer environment for both responding assets and community members
Serve as a Force Multiplier: DFR programs allow agencies to be more efficient. It’s reported that 25% of incidents in which a drone is dispatched, no ground units are needed, and freeing personnel to answer other needs.
Support Investigations and Prosecutions: In many cases, the teleoperator is able to observe things prior to officers arriving on scene that support the case for prosecution. Provide Cost-Effective Air Support: It can cost millions of dollars to purchase a single police helicopter, with maintenance, fuel, and pilot costs driving the price of operating these vehicles even higher. Helicopter fuel alone costs hundreds of dollars per hour. In contrast, even small police departments can purchase and operate a drone for a relative pittance.
Support Beyond Policing: DFR programs can assist with fire emergencies by providing live stream imagery of the situation. This valuable intel will equip fire commanders with the information needed to assess what type of response is needed. This can reduce costs associated with deploying large apparatuses and equipment that are not needed.
Additionally, public works can take advantage of the real time video feed to determine what resources are needed for road hazards like fallen trees.
BRINC is offering the Town of Paradise a 365-day, free trial of their product. They are committed to building the system needed for our community, allowing us to test-drive it for a year, and then decide whether we want to move forward with their solution, at no-cost to the Town.
Paradise Municipal Code Chapter 2.45 Purchasing System requires the Town to undertake certain purchasing procedures. Paradise Municipal Code Section 2.45.070 allows for exemptions to the Town’s formal bidding process under the following three applicable provisions:
B. When the commodity can be obtained from only one vendor. A commodity shall be considered obtainable only from one vendor when only one vendor offers it for sale, lease or rental, or when only one vendor is able to do so within the time frame and/or under the terms and conditions which reasonably meet the needs of the town, or when there is a sole distributer or manufacturer of a product or service such that there is no acceptable substitute within a specific geographical area C. When the professional services are unique and not appropriate for competitive bidding
G. When computer software is required for a specific town service or activity and its selection is evaluated and determined by the purchasing officer based on the software being the most effective solution for the service or activity.
Analysis:
Staff propose to use a sole-source justification to accept BRINC’s 365-day, free trial agreement.
This agreement to the free trial also locks in a proposed cost for a five-year contract with BRINC.
If, at the end of the trial period, the Town decides that this technology/resource isn’t feasible, then 110
BRINC will hold the Town harmless and remove their system at no cost. If, on the other hand, the Town decides to move forward with BRINC, then the Town will enter into a five-year contract agreement for BRINC’s DFR system.
When considering the best solution for the Paradise Police Department, and the community it serves, we analyzed the following components:
Costs – In attempts to compare apples to apples, we received initial quotes ranging from $50,000 - $100,000, annually.
o Though BRINC is at the top of these proposals, they provide the most comprehensive proposal.
American Made – Only BRINC provided a system/package that was US made. Requires Certain Technology – The software used to manage this technology offers far better resources and tools to ensure that first responders have what they need, when they need it.
o Unique to BRINC, they utilizes cell tower transmissions with an RF back haul system to ensure that their technology never loses connection, even if cell coverage is lacking.
Based on Paradise Municipal Code Section 2.45.070 B, C and G, staff propose to proceed with accepting this free trial from this vendor without competitive bids. After researching available products and services, staff is completely satisfied there are no other vendors who could provide such a robust system at this price. Secondly, this purchase is wholly necessitated by an increasing population, which increases the call for services in protecting public health, safety, and welfare.
Financial Impact:
The total cost for engaging in the one-year trial offer is $0. BRINC agrees to set up the DFR system and infrastructure at no cost, allowing the Paradise Police Department to test their system for 365 days. At the end of the year trial:
o If the Town determines that DFR services are not feasible, BRINC agrees to remove the DFR platform at no cost
o If the Town determines that the DFR service is in the best interest of the community, the Town will agree to enter into an agreement with BRINC for a fiveyear contract. 111
TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF PARADISE MAKING
FINDINGS CONCERNING SOLE VENDOR FOR ENTERING INTO CONTRACT WITH BRINC DRONES AS FIRST RESPONDERS (DFR) SERVICES – SOLE SOURCE WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise recognizes that BRINC is offering a unique solution that qualifies under Paradise Municipal Code Chapter 2.45.070 (B), (C), and (G) for sole source vendor purchase.
WHEREAS, the Town of Paradise to enter into contract with BRINC and services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise as follows:
Section 1. The Town Manager of the Town of Paradise, or their designee, is hereby authorized to enter into contract with BRINC for the services outlined in Exhibit “A”.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Town Council of the Town of Paradise on this 10th day of February, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
By: ________________________________
Steve Crowder, Mayor
ATTEST:
Melenie Elvis, Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott E. Huber, Town Attorney
112
TOWN OF PARADISE
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-___
EXHIBIT "A"
Services Pricing Proposal:
The total cost for implementing this project is $0. (1 YEAR TEST/TRIAL) The purchase price for BRINC system is $0.
o If at the end of the 1-year testing period, the Town of Paradise agrees to move forward with the system and services, the contract with BRINC will transition to the following:
5-year service contract for $350,000 - $430,000 (Depending on final contract agreement)
Includes unlimited repairs, on-site training on hardware and software, installation of docking station and RF infrastructure pole. Includes drone upgrade to the latest class of drone system every two years of the program. Agency keeps the original drone(s).
This provides unlimited replacements for the duration of the program. All the above service inclusions will be present during the 1st year trial period. 113
“Paradise Police is committed to improving the quality of life in our community.” Drones as First Responder (DFR) Program
Cost-Benefit Analysis with Risk Management Justification Executive Summary
This Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) evaluates the implementation of a Drones as First Responder (DFR) program for the Paradise Police Department (PPD) in Paradise, California. The analysis incorporates finalized 2025 Calls for Service (CFS) data and a vendor proposal from BRINC Drones that includes a nocost, no-obligation first-year pilot followed by a five-year service agreement at $80,000 per year.
The DFR program is evaluated as a risk-mitigation and operational efficiency measure designed to address sustained increases in service demand, limited staffing capacity, and the need for enhanced situational awareness during emergency response.
Calls for Service and Operational Demand
• 2022: 9,972 CFS
• 2023: 11,313 CFS
• 2024: 14,710 CFS
• 2025 (Final): 16,100 CFS
The data demonstrates a sustained increase in demand for police services. While growth has moderated, the department is operating at a significantly higher workload baseline than in prior years. This trend places continued pressure on response times, officer availability, and supervisory oversight.
Risk Management and Liability Alignment
From a municipal risk-management perspective, the DFR program aligns with established best practices intended to reduce exposure to preventable risk. Early aerial assessment allows for informed deployment decisions, reducing the likelihood of unnecessary officer confrontations, improper resource allocation, and delayed response to critical incidents.
The use of DFR supports the Town’s duty to reasonably deploy available technology to enhance public and employee safety. DFR provides real-time intelligence that supports defensible, well-documented operational decisions.
Staffing Constraints and Force Multiplication
The Paradise Police Department operates with limited sworn staffing and minimum shift coverage requirements. Traditional trunk-deployed drone operations require available personnel and are therefore not scalable for routine use. A DFR system functions as a force multiplier by providing immediate aerial reconnaissance without increasing staffing levels or overtime expenditures.
Program Cost Structure
• Year 1: Fully deployed DFR pilot program at no cost
114
“Paradise Police is committed to improving the quality of life in our community.” • Years 2–6: $80,000 per year
• Total paid cost over five years: $400,000
• Effective annualized cost over six years (including pilot): ~$66,667 Officer Time Savings and Financial Impact
Using conservative assumptions that approximately 25% of annual calls for service are suitable for initial DFR deployment (~4,025 calls annually), estimated officer time savings are as follows (fully burdened officer cost estimated at $60/hour):
• Low scenario (18 minutes saved per deployment): ~$72,480 per year • Mid scenario (45 minutes saved per deployment): ~$181,140 per year • High scenario (75 minutes saved per deployment): ~$301,860 per year Six-Year Net Financial Impact
Because the first year of the program is provided at no cost, savings accrue during all six years while vendor payments occur only during five years.
• Low scenario: ~$434,880 in savings vs. $400,000 cost (net +$34,880) • Mid scenario: ~$1,086,840 in savings vs. $400,000 cost (net +$686,840) • High scenario: ~$1,811,160 in savings vs. $400,000 cost (net +$1,411,160) Additional Risk-Reduction Benefits
• Improved officer safety through pre-arrival situational awareness • Reduced likelihood of unnecessary use-of-force encounters • Enhanced documentation and evidentiary integrity
• Rapid intelligence sharing with CAL FIRE during fire incidents • Reduced unnecessary vehicle responses, lowering collision and injury risk • Demonstrated commitment to proactive, data-informed public safety practices Conclusion and Recommendation
With confirmed 2025 workload levels and ongoing staffing constraints, the BRINC DFR program represents a prudent and cost-effective risk-reduction strategy. The reduced annual cost further strengthens the financial case for implementation.
It is recommended that the Town authorize participation in the no-cost DFR pilot program, with continuation into the five-year agreement contingent upon demonstrated operational performance, risk reduction, and community benefit.
115
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 6(b)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Assistant Town Manager
REVIEWED BY: Mike O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Review of 2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan (CAP)
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
Yes – Building Codes and Standards
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Approve the Corrective Action Plan for the 2025 Building Division Audit with planned future updates quarterly; or,
2. Provide alternate direction.
Background:
In November 2025, the Town released the results of an independent audit of the Building Division focused on permitting and inspection practices during the post–Camp Fire rebuilding period. While the audit did not identify illegal wrongdoing, it identified deficiencies related to training, oversight, documentation, permit intake procedures, and inspection consistency, and recommended a series of organizational and operational improvements.
A Corrective Action Plan (CAP) was prepared to translate those recommendations into specific, trackable implementation actions. The item was scheduled for Council consideration on January 13, 2026; however, the agenda item was pulled prior to discussion to allow staff additional time to refine the CAP and provide further clarity before returning it to Council for review.
Staff has since prepared a revised CAP for February 10, 2026. This updated version maintains the core structure and intent of the original draft while incorporating several important refinements intended to strengthen clarity, accountability, and transparency.
Analysis:
The Corrective Action Plan (CAP) organizes the audit recommendations into a structured implementation framework through five functional matrix tables. Table A – Community Development Administration – Leadership structure and governance; use of interim or consulting support; organizational alignment of Code Enforcement functions; evaluation of Building and Code Enforcement leadership classifications; development of performance metrics and dashboards; advisory oversight of CAP implementation; and establishment of formal escalation protocols for elevated permitting and inspection matters requiring management review. 116
Table B – Permit Counter Process Improvements – Training enhancements for permit staff; dedicated permit intake staffing; classroom and embedded training support; revision of permit procedures and public informational materials; evaluation of professional certification requirements; and establishment of comprehensive applicant verification and supervisory authorization controls for business entities, owner-builders, and non-contractor applicants in compliance with applicable state law. Table C – Building Inspection Process Reforms – Training enhancements for inspection staff; classroom and field-based inspection training; use of Field Training Officers and subject-matter experts; off-site professional development; certification requirements; implementation of a quality assurance function for inspection oversight; uniform inspection checklists and photo documentation; and inspection performance accountability and final inspection integrity controls. Table D – Public Support & Complaint Resolution – Establishment of an ombudsman function; improved transparency regarding complaint pathways and available resources; and publication of guidance to assist homeowners in understanding appropriate resolution pathways for building-related concerns.
Table E – Future Supplemental Recommendations – Reserved for additional corrective actions identified through expanded statistical analysis, performance metrics, quality assurance reviews, and stakeholder feedback. Items added to Table E will be incorporated into Tables A–D as appropriate through future updates to the CAP.
In addition to responding directly to the audit findings, the CAP commits the Town to expanded analysis and continuous improvement informed by performance metrics and community feedback. A new community intake form and structured review process will allow homeowners and stakeholders to share concerns and experiences in a consistent and documented manner.
These inputs, combined with quality assurance reviews and data tracking, will guide future refinements to the CAP and support evidence-based decision-making.
A central element of the CAP is the establishment of an ombudsman function to serve as a neutral point of contact for community members seeking assistance with building-related concerns. This role is intended to improve communication, ensure issues are directed to appropriate resolution pathways, and enhance public understanding of available resources and processes.
Implementation of the CAP will occur in phases over the coming months, with several actions already underway and others scheduled through 2026. Progress will be tracked through defined milestones and reported to the Town Council on a quarterly basis. The CAP is designed as a living document that will evolve as additional data, performance review results, and community feedback become available.
If approved, the Town will launch a new publicly accessible webpage the following day that consolidates key materials related to this effort, including the independent audit, the Corrective Action Plan, a community intake form, and new resource guides for homeowners and builders.
Staff will also initiate a coordinated media engagement effort to inform the community about these resources and to encourage public participation in the next phase of implementation.
Together, these actions are intended to increase transparency, improve accessibility, and mark a critical step forward in strengthening Building Division operations and restoring public confidence.
117
This Council review represents the first formal policy-level discussion of the CAP. Council input at this stage will help guide prioritization, reporting expectations, and any adjustments prior to full implementation and ongoing updates.
Financial Impact:
Implementation of the CAP will initially be supported through existing Building Division resources, reallocated staff time, and previously authorized consulting and training services. Several corrective actions—such as third-party training, field training officers, quality assurance functions, and development of performance dashboards—are already underway or anticipated within recent supplemental budget modifications.
As implementation proceeds, staff anticipates the need for additional operational and technical support to sustain quality assurance, oversight, and public interface functions established through the CAP. Accordingly, future budget adjustments and potential staffing augmentations may be required to fully implement and maintain these corrective actions. 118
2025 Building Division Audit
Corrective Action Plan
RESTORING COMMUNITY CONFIDENCE THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION
FOR TOWN COUNCIL REVIEW FEBRUARY 10, 2026
Prepared by:
Marc Mattox
Assistant Town Manager
119
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Table of Contents
1. Statement of Purpose and Community Commitment ........................................................................... 2
2. Intended Use of This Document........................................................................................................... 3
3. Background and Context..................................................................................................................... 4
4. Post-Fire Recovery Context and 2025 Audit.......................................................................................... 5
4.1 Scale and Complexity of the Rebuild Environment....................................................................... 5
4.2 Recognizing the Contributions and Challenges of Staff................................................................ 5
4.3 Introduction of Fire-Resilient and Innovative Construction Methods............................................. 5
4.4 Limitations of the 2025 Audit Sample.......................................................................................... 6
5. Commitment to Expanded Analysis and Data-Driven Evaluation........................................................... 7
5.1 Need for Statistically Meaningful Metrics .................................................................................... 7
5.2 Types of Data the Town Will Compile .......................................................................................... 7
5.3 How the Expanded Analysis Supports Public Confidence ............................................................ 7
5.4 Defining Appropriate Pathways for Homeowners with Concerns .................................................. 7
5.5 Commitment to Publishing Findings and Updating Metrics .......................................................... 8
6. Corrective Action Framework and Implementation Matrix..................................................................... 9
6.1 Purpose and Scope of the Corrective Action Framework.............................................................. 9
6.2 Recommendation-to-Action Flow ............................................................................................... 9
6.3 Tracking, Accountability, and Interpretation of CAP Progress ....................................................... 9
6.4 How to Read the Corrective Action Matrix ................................................................................. 10
6.5 Corrective Action Matrix Organization and Recommendation Inventory...................................... 10
6.6 Corrective Action Matrix ........................................................................................................... 11
7. Proposed CAP Timeline ..................................................................................................................... 20
8. Public Reporting, Transparency, and Advisory Oversight..................................................................... 21
8.1 Public Reporting Commitments................................................................................................ 21
8.2 Adapted Ad Hoc Advisory Committee ....................................................................................... 21 120
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
1. Statement of Purpose and Community Commitment
The Town of Paradise recognizes that homes represent far more than structures—they reflect safety, stability, financial investment, and a sense of security for individuals and families rebuilding their lives following the 2018 Camp Fire. For a community recovering from such a profound loss, concerns raised regarding construction quality, permitting, and inspections are taken seriously because of the real and lasting impacts that deficiencies can have when expectations of safety and reliability are not met.
Responsibility for construction compliance rests with builders and design professionals; however, the Town acknowledges its essential role in administering building permits and inspections intended to promote safety, consistency, and accountability. When concerns are brought forward—whether through formal complaints, public meetings, or other channels—they provide valuable insight into how systems are functioning and where improvements may be needed, particularly in a rebuilding environment marked by urgency, complexity, and heightened community expectations.
This Corrective Action Plan responds to concerns identified to date while also recognizing the importance of continuing to surface, evaluate, and learn from additional input as implementation proceeds. Reviewing known concerns, inviting further feedback, and strengthening intake and quality assurance processes are central to identifying issues early, improving outcomes over time, and supporting confidence in the rebuilding process.
121
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
2. Intended Use of This Document
This Corrective Action Plan (CAP) is a foundational accountability document developed in response to the 2025 independent audit of the Building Division. It establishes a clear, traceable, and durable framework for documenting the actions the Town has taken—and will continue to take—to address organizational, procedural, and operational findings identified through the audit and subsequent efforts.
The CAP serves as a roadmap for implementation, oversight, and reporting. It is designed to support responsible governance, guide staff execution, and provide transparency to the Town Council and the public. The document will be updated periodically to reflect progress, lessons learned, and refinements as corrective actions are implemented.
122
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
3. Background and Context
In August 2025, following ongoing community concerns related to rebuilding timelines, permit consistency, and inspection reliability during the post–Camp Fire recovery period, the Town initiated an independent audit to evaluate Building Division permitting and inspection practices. The audit identified opportunities to improve permit intake processes, inspector training, oversight, and documentation protocols. While no illegal wrongdoing was found, the review underscored the need for clearer procedures, stronger internal controls, and more consistent application of adopted building standards in order to enhance accountability and restore public confidence.
This Corrective Action Plan translates those findings, along with subsequent organizational review by Town staff, into specific and trackable corrective actions. Its purpose is not only to resolve identified deficiencies, but also to establish a durable framework for continuous improvement, accountability, and transparency.
Community confidence in the rebuilding process depends on both technical compliance with building codes and the ability of residents to understand how concerns are evaluated and addressed. This CAP serves as a public-facing roadmap that documents corrective actions, explains how progress will be measured, and demonstrates the Town’s commitment to strengthening Building Division operations over time.
By aligning audit-driven improvements with structured reporting and community engagement, the Town seeks to reinforce trust, support homeowners and builders, and ensure that rebuilding efforts continue in a manner that is safe, consistent, and responsive to community expectations. 123
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
4. Post-Fire Recovery Context and 2025 Audit
4.1 Scale and Complexity of the Rebuild Environment
The 2025 Building Division Audit provides a helpful snapshot of issues requiring correction; however, it represents a limited view of a far larger operational environment. Since the Camp Fire in 2018, the Town of Paradise has undertaken one of the most extensive residential rebuilding efforts in California. Since the rebuild began in earnest in early 2020, the Building Division has processed 3,666 single-family residential building permit applications, resulting in 3,016 Certificates of Occupancy issued. In addition, 1,022 multifamily unit applications have been processed, with 683 Certificates of Occupancy issued to date. The rebuilding effort has created a surge of work unmatched in the Town’s history, requiring constant adaptation to high-volume demand, evolving regulatory expectations, and community pressures for rapid permitting and inspection timelines.
4.2 Recognizing the Contributions and Challenges of Staff Throughout this period of accelerated rebuilding activity, Building Division staff have:
• Successfully processed thousands of permits and inspection requests, • Supported residents rebuilding under difficult personal and economic circumstances, • Adapted to new materials and code requirements with limited precedent or training resources available at the time,
• Maintained service availability despite staffing fluctuations, procedural changes, and an unusually high volume of work.
The CAP aims to build upon these contributions, address identified process gaps and ensure the Building Division is equipped to operate effectively within a modern, resilient building environment.
4.3 Introduction of Fire-Resilient and Innovative Construction Methods A unique aspect of the Town’s post-fire recovery is the substantial introduction of innovative construction technologies and fire-resilient building systems—many of which had not been widely used, or used at all, in Paradise prior to 2018. These include:
• Enhanced wildland–urban interface (WUI) compliance requirements, • Nontraditional roofing, siding, and venting assemblies, • Advanced ember-resistant construction methods,
• New insulation and energy-performance products,
• More complex structural and foundation systems related to fire-damaged soils, • Emerging materials promoted for enhanced fire resistance or environmental performance.
Because these systems were new to many contractors, designers, and staff, the Building Division has had to:
• Learn and interpret new product listings, installation standards, and manufacturer specifications, • Update internal procedures to align with continuously evolving state and national codes, • Assess building methods not previously encountered in the Town’s traditional residential portfolio, 124
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
• Balance life-safety and compliance while supporting homeowners who wish to adopt innovative, resilient solutions.
This environment created a steep learning curve for the entire rebuild community—builders, design professionals, inspectors, and permitting staff alike. The Town recognizes this complexity and is committed to using the CAP not only to correct identified gaps but also to strengthen the institutional capacity necessary to support a more advanced, resilient, and fire-hardened building environment.
4.4 Limitations of the 2025 Audit Sample
The 2025 Building Division Audit identified issues that warrant corrective action and organizational improvement. The Town recognizes that each concern reviewed through the audit reflects a real homeowner experience and that deficiencies—regardless of how they are identified—must be addressed thoroughly and responsibly.
The audit was initiated to promptly review a defined set of escalated concerns related to Building Division permitting and inspection practices during the post-fire rebuilding period. Its purpose was to identify potential process gaps, training needs, and near-term organizational improvements, rather than to serve as a comprehensive evaluation of all Building Division activity following the Camp Fire.
The Town accepts the audit’s findings and recommendations as valid within their scope and is committed to implementing corrective actions where issues were identified. At the same time, the Town recognizes the importance of evaluating overall performance within the context of the full range of work performed and the operational environment in which rebuilding has occurred.
The Town further acknowledges that the absence of statistical representativeness does not lessen the significance of individual homeowner concerns or the need to address them carefully and transparently.
These considerations underscore the importance of supplementing the audit with broader, data-driven analysis to inform ongoing corrective actions and performance evaluation.
As described in the following section, the Town will undertake expanded analysis to establish meaningful performance metrics, evaluate trends across permitting and inspection categories, and provide the community with a more complete understanding of both areas of strength and opportunities for continued improvement. It is anticipated that this broader analysis will inform future updates to the CAP and identify additional improvement actions as appropriate.
125
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
5. Commitment to Expanded Analysis and Data-Driven Evaluation
5.1 Need for Statistically Meaningful Metrics
To provide the public, Town Council, regional partners, and oversight bodies with a full understanding of the Building Division’s performance, the Town will conduct broader and more systematic analysis beyond the scope of the original audit. This analysis is necessary to:
• Understand trends and volumes across all permit types, • Identify meaningful indicators of inspection quality, • Differentiate isolated issues from systemic gaps,
• Enhance transparency into the Town’s ongoing rebuilding efforts.
5.2 Types of Data the Town Will Compile
The Town will compile, analyze, and publish available data sets, including, but not limited to:
• Permitting Data
• Inspection Data
• Certificate of Occupancy Data
• Contractor-Related Data
5.3 How the Expanded Analysis Supports Public Confidence By establishing statistically relevant datasets, the Town can:
• Distinguish between isolated incidents and patterns of concern, • Provide clearer context for the rate of inspection errors (if any) relative to total volume, • Demonstrate when inspection performance is consistent with industry norms, • Identify new areas where process improvements are warranted, • Help homeowners understand the most appropriate pathways for their individual concerns.
5.4 Defining Appropriate Pathways for Homeowners with Concerns The expanded analysis will also support the creation of a homeowner resolution framework. This framework recognizes that not all concerns identified by homeowners fall within municipal jurisdiction.
Based on statistical context and inspection records, some homeowners may be better served through:
• Contractor warranties,
• Bond claims,
• California Contractors State License Board (CSLB) actions, • Private home inspections,
• Industry-standard defect resolution processes, or
• Ombudsman-guided navigation, as recommended in the audit.
The Town will provide clear guidance to help residents understand:
1. Whether their issue is likely related to inspection oversight, 126
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
2. Whether the issue is a workmanship or contractor performance matter,
3. What type of recourse is available under California law,
4. How to pursue resolution with the appropriate party.
This structured pathway will help ensure that homeowners receive clear, accurate information and that Building Division staff focus on matters within municipal scope.
These pathways are intended to complement—not replace—the Town’s ongoing efforts to improve early detection of deficiencies and reduce the likelihood that issues persist through final inspection and occupancy.
5.5 Commitment to Publishing Findings and Updating Metrics The Town will publish periodic reports summarizing:
• Key datasets and trends,
• Findings from expanded analysis,
• Updated metrics and evaluation tools,
• Improvement initiatives resulting from performance review.
These findings will be incorporated into future CAP updates and may inform additional corrective actions or operational reforms.
127
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
6. Corrective Action Framework and Implementation Matrix This section describes the framework through which the Town translates audit findings and internally identified improvement opportunities into actionable, trackable corrective actions, and explains how implementation progress is documented, interpreted, and reviewed. The Corrective Action Matrix presented in this section serves as the primary implementation and accountability tool for this Corrective Action Plan (CAP).
6.1 Purpose and Scope of the Corrective Action Framework The Corrective Action Framework establishes a structured, transparent approach for responding to the 2025 Building Division Audit and for strengthening Building Division operations over time. The framework is designed to ensure that recommendations are evaluated consistently, assigned to responsible parties, implemented through defined actions, and tracked using objective criteria. It supports responsible governance, operational accountability, and clear communication with the Town Council, staff, and the public.
6.2 Recommendation-to-Action Flow
Audit findings and internally identified improvement opportunities are processed through a standardized sequence: identification of the recommendation; internal assessment; assignment to a responsible division or role; development of specific corrective actions; execution with defined milestones; and documentation of implementation progress. Where alternative approaches are selected, the rationale is documented to maintain transparency and institutional clarity.
6.3 Tracking, Accountability, and Interpretation of CAP Progress Implementation progress is tracked through the Corrective Action Matrix contained in this section. The matrix provides a structured, point-in-time record of each corrective action, including its lifecycle stage and a narrative summary of actions taken or underway as of the date of each update.
Each corrective action is assigned an Implementation Phase (e.g., Initiated, Ongoing, Substantially Complete, or Ongoing/Institutionalized) to communicate progress through the corrective action lifecycle.
The Current Status & Actions column provides a narrative description of actions to date, which may include completed steps, activities underway, planned milestones, or explanations of alternate approaches. Because corrective actions may be implemented in phases, entries may reflect interim or evolving conditions rather than final outcomes.
For tracking and reporting purposes, a corrective action may be considered substantially complete when its core elements have been implemented, operationalized, and supported by documentation such that they function as part of standard operations rather than as temporary or pilot efforts. Substantial completion does not require that all long-term monitoring, evaluation, or continuous improvement activities have concluded.
128
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Substantial completion is evaluated using the following criteria:
1. Implementation – The corrective action is implemented and in active use.
2. Durability – The corrective action is embedded in standard operations and not dependent solely on interim measures or individual assignments.
3. Evidence – Documentation exists to substantiate implementation and support transparency, accountability, and future review.
6.4 How to Read the Corrective Action Matrix
The Corrective Action Matrix is intended to be read as a point-in-time snapshot of CAP implementation.
Entries reflect conditions as of the date of each update and may describe interim steps, phased implementation, or ongoing institutional functions. Completion of individual actions or milestones within the matrix does not necessarily indicate closure of an entire corrective action unless explicitly identified as such. Readers are encouraged to consider the matrix in conjunction with the broader narrative sections of this CAP to understand sequencing, context, and longer-term improvement efforts.
6.5 Corrective Action Matrix Organization and Recommendation Inventory Corrective actions are organized by functional area to support clear reference, oversight, and reporting.
The matrix includes the following tables, which together reflect the full scope of recommendations derived from the independent audit.
• Table A – Community Development Administration – Leadership structure and governance; use of interim or consulting support; organizational alignment of Code Enforcement functions; evaluation of Building and Code Enforcement leadership classifications; development of performance metrics and dashboards; advisory oversight of CAP implementation; and establishment of formal escalation protocols for elevated permitting and inspection matters requiring management review.
• Table B – Permit Counter Process Improvements – Training enhancements for permit staff; dedicated permit intake staffing; classroom and embedded training support; revision of permit procedures and public informational materials; evaluation of professional certification requirements; and establishment of comprehensive applicant verification and supervisory authorization controls for business entities, owner-builders, and non-contractor applicants in compliance with applicable state law.
• Table C – Building Inspection Process Reforms – Training enhancements for inspection staff; classroom and field-based inspection training; use of Field Training Officers and subject-matter experts; off-site professional development; certification requirements; implementation of a quality assurance function for inspection oversight; uniform inspection checklists and photo documentation; and inspection performance accountability and final inspection integrity controls. • Table D – Public Support & Complaint Resolution – Establishment of an ombudsman function; improved transparency regarding complaint pathways and available resources; and publication of guidance to assist homeowners in understanding appropriate resolution pathways for buildingrelated concerns. • Table E – Future Supplemental Recommendations – Reserved for additional corrective actions identified through expanded statistical analysis, performance metrics, quality assurance reviews, 129
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
and stakeholder feedback. Items added to Table E will be incorporated into Tables A–D as appropriate through future updates to the CAP.
This inventory is provided for orientation purposes and does not reflect implementation status, sequencing, or completion.
6.6 Corrective Action Matrix
The Corrective Action Matrix translates the above recommendations into discrete, trackable action items.
For each entry, the matrix documents:
• the audit-based or internally derived recommendation, • the applicable Implementation Phase, and
• the Town’s Current Status & Actions, which may include actions taken, actions underway, planned milestones, or explanations of alternate approaches.
The matrix is intentionally designed to be dynamic. Entries will be updated periodically to reflect evolving conditions, implementation milestones, policy changes, training completion, organizational adjustments, performance measures, or other relevant outcomes. Where a recommendation is modified, deferred, or addressed through an alternative strategy, the rationale will be documented. 130
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Table A: Community Development Administration
ID# Recommendation
Implementation
Phase Current Status & Actions
A-1
Hire a dedicated
Community
Development Director.
Ongoing
The Town of Paradise has retained the services of temporary consultant staff while assigning the restructured Assistant Town Manager to prepare and oversee the implementation of the CAP.
Supplemental staff and administrative oversight will continue as long as necessary to achieve meaningful programmatic
improvements identified in this CAP and future updates to the CAP.
A-2
Consider the use of an
interim CD Director via a
consulting firm.
Complete
The services of Ron Beehler of BPR Consulting Group were retained to function as an interim Community Development Director. This assignment has been carried forward through the appointment of the Assistant Town Manager to prepare and oversee the CAP. In the short term, Mr. Beehler will continue to perform advisory services to summarize experiences and
inform/measure corrective actions. Additional technical assistance will be secured and available through the
implementation of the CAP.
A-3
Consider moving Code
Enforcement under the
Planning Division.
Complete
Considered and declined. The current staffing model and functional scope of Code Enforcement are better aligned with Building and Fire Prevention than the Planning Division.
A-4
Consider reclassifying
the Director of Building &
Code Enforcement to
Building Official / Fire
Marshal.
Complete
Considered and declined. Current staffing model and oversight by the Community Development Director remain sufficient. With additional oversight by the Assistant Town Manager and
implementation actions through the CAP, no adjustments to this position are necessary.
A-5
Develop a performance
dashboard for permits,
inspections, and
complaints.
Ongoing
The performance dashboard development is underway. The
dashboard will augment weekly rebuild updates to include monthly comprehensive performance metrics. Updates will include total customer interactions and inspection data. Target roll-out date of February 28, 2026.
A-6
Establish formal
escalation protocols for
elevated Building
Division matters
requiring management
review.
Ongoing
The Town will adopt procedures requiring that elevated matters be referred to the Assistant Town Manager for review and direction.
Examples include requests for expedited processing, disputes regarding fees, permits, or inspection determinations, and potential deviations from standard procedures.
131
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
A-7
Establish advisory
committee for CAP
progress monitoring
(Council-authorized).
Ongoing
Town will launch Ad Hoc Advisory Committee which would support transparency and organized stakeholder engagement by reviewing CAP implementation progress, discussing procedural clarity, and considering themes identified through the Corrective Action Matrix, performance metrics, and stakeholder feedback.
132
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Table B: Permit Counter Process Improvements
ID# Recommendation
Implementation
Phase Current Status & Actions
B-1
Provide in-person
training for permit staff
on ethics, best
practices, and legal
requirements.
Ongoing
Effective December 1, 2025 the services of Jessie Oswald of Bureau Veritas were engaged to provide in-person oversight of all aspects of the building permitting process. Services are scheduled to continue through the end of January 2026. Additional efforts will be evaluated on an ongoing basis through implementation of the CAP.
B-2
Assign two dedicated
permit technicians for
permit intake and
issuance.
Complete
Effective December 1, 2025 two dedicated Permit Technicians were assigned to handle permit intake and issuance. This approach improves efficiency, ensures consistency in application processing, reduces turnaround times, and allows other staff to focus on plan review, inspections, and customer support functions.
B-3
Provide classroom
training for permit
technicians and
supervisors.
Ongoing
The services of Steve Burger of Bureau Veritas have been retained to provide two full days of onsite classroom training covering all aspects of the building permitting process. These trainings are scheduled for February 10-11, 2026.
Staff will also seek opportunities to further their ongoing professional development continuously and noted in future updates to the CAP.
B-4
Provide two weeks of
embedded trainer
support at the permit
counter.
Ongoing
Effective December 1, 2025, the services of Jessie Oswald of Bureau Veritas were retained to provide in-person oversight of all aspects of the building permitting process.
Embedded support has been provided and will continue to be available through the implementation of the CAP.
B-5 Revise the permit
procedures manual. Ongoing
Starting December 1, 2025, the services of Jessie Oswald of Bureau Veritas were engaged to revise and update procedural guidelines. Target milestone date of February 28, 2026.
B-6
Require ICC Permit
Technician Certification
for classification.
Ongoing
Any changes to the minimum qualification requirements for employees in the Permit Technician classification trigger meetand-confer obligations between the Town and Union representatives. Human Resources & Risk Management Director will be coordinating this process and more information will be included in future updates to the CAP.
133
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
B-7 Provide updated public
informational materials. Ongoing
Starting December 1, 2025, the services of Jessie Oswald of Bureau Veritas were engaged to revise and update all public informational materials. Target milestone date of February 28, 2026.
B-8
Establish
comprehensive permit
applicant verification
and supervisory
authorization controls
for business entities,
contractor, and ownerbuilder applicants.
Ongoing
The Town will implement standardized verification procedures for permit applications submitted by business entities, ownerbuilders, and non-contractor applicants. These procedures will require documentation of legal authority and compliance with Business and Professions Code section 7044 and Labor Code Section 2750, including workers’ compensation declarations.
These controls will be incorporated into permit procedures, training materials, and quality assurance reviews.
B-9
Establish a quality
assurance function for
permit intake oversight.
Ongoing
Starting February 2026, the Town will establish a quality assurance function for permit intake oversight to promote consistency, accuracy, and compliance with adopted procedures. This function will include periodic sampling of permit intake decisions, review of required documentation, and supervisory oversight of
standardized checklists. Findings will inform training and continuous improvement efforts.
134
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Table C: Building Inspection Process Reforms
ID# Recommendation
Implementation
Phase Current Status & Actions
C-1
Provide in-person, in lieu
of existing online-only,
ethics training for
inspectors.
Ongoing
Town staff has finalized in-person training scheduled for March 11, 2026. Training is planned for all available staff at Town Hall and Building Resiliency Center.
C-2
Provide classroom
training for inspection of
residential buildings,
plan reading, and
calculation
interpretation.
Ongoing
Building Inspection staff will attend the 2026 Sacramento Valley Building Officials Education Week and the California Association of Building Officials Education Week.
Staff will also seek opportunities to further their ongoing professional development continuously and noted in future updates to the CAP.
C-3
Employ a Field Training
Officer (FTO) for at least
six months.
Ongoing
Starting October 27, 2025, the services of Mike Genna of BPR Consulting were retained as a Field Training Officer. The Town plans to rotate in new FTOs starting February 1, 2026 to ensure staff receives the benefit of multiple perspectives in this effort.
C-4
Provide off-site
professional training for
inspectors.
Ongoing
Building Inspection staff have attended a four-hour webinar on the 2025 Significant Changes to the California Residential Code. The California Energy Commission presented significant changes to the 2025 Building Code at January 2026 Building Stakeholders meeting.
Staff will also be attending the monthly Shasta Cascade Chapter of the International Code Council meetings, which include an educational component. In addition, staff will attend the Sacramento Valley Building Officials Education Week and the California Association of Building Officials Education Week to further support ongoing professional development.
Staff will also seek opportunities to further their ongoing professional development continuously and noted in future updates to the CAP.
C-5
Require Building
Inspector II to obtain a
second certification
within 90 days of return.
Completed Second ICC certification obtained on January 13, 2026 (ahead of 90-day recommendation).
135
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
C-6
Establish a quality
assurance function for
inspection oversight.
Ongoing
Starting February 1, 2026, Bureau Veritas will be engaged to provide a quality assurance function for inspection oversight. This effort is being developed to promote consistency, accuracy, and accountability across inspections. This function will include standardized inspection checklists, supervisory review, mentoring, and periodic audits to ensure inspections are conducted in accordance with adopted codes and best practices. Target milestone date of April 30, 2026.
C-7
Implement uniform
inspection checklists
and photo
documentation.
Ongoing
Photographic inspection procedures have been implemented, and uniform inspection checklists are currently under development with Bureau Veritas.
C-8
Implement inspection
performance
accountability and final
inspection controls.
Ongoing
The Town will establish formal inspection performance review protocols supported by the Quality Assurance function. Reviews will include periodic sampling of inspection records, field audits, and standardized checklists and photo documentation. Final inspection procedures will be revised to require documented verification that all prior correction notices have been resolved prior to approval. Supervisory review will be required for final approvals involving exceptions or unresolved items.
136
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Table D: Public Support & Complaint Resolution
ID# Recommendation
Implementation
Phase Current Status & Actions
D-1
Establish an
ombudsman role to
support homeowners
navigating construction
concerns.
Ongoing
The ombudsman recommendation will be performed by the
Assistant Town Manager, through which information relating to concerns will be received and researched. Property owners may rely on this role to receive information from the Town regarding their concern and potential next steps. Notably, this ombudsman role is intended to facilitate information-sharing and navigation, not adjudication or enforcement. Matters that may fall within the scope of potential remedy or formal action will be referred to the Town Manager, Town Council and Town Attorney, as appropriate.
Additional support for the ombudsman function may be required as the Town collects input from the community.
D-2
Improve transparency
regarding complaint
pathways and available
resources.
Ongoing
In coordination with the ombudsman function described in D-1, the Town will publish clear, publicly accessible information describing how building-related concerns may be raised, reviewed, and routed.
This information will outline the respective roles of Town staff, contractors, and external regulatory entities, as well as the types of issues that fall within municipal oversight versus those more appropriately addressed through contractor warranties, licensing authorities, or other consumer protection mechanisms.
Transparency materials will be posted to the Town’s a dedicated page on the Town’s website and updated periodically to reflect procedural changes, available resources, and lessons learned through implementation of the CAP. The goal of this effort is to ensure that property owners understand both how to engage with the Town and what pathways are available for resolution, while maintaining clarity regarding municipal authority and limitations.
Additional support for the ombudsman function may be required as the Town collects input from the community.
137
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
Table E: Future Supplemental Recommendations
ID# Recommendation
Implementation
Phase Current Status & Actions
E-# TBD TBD TBD
138
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
7. Proposed CAP Timeline
The following timeline provides a high-level sequencing framework for implementation of the corrective actions identified in this Corrective Action Plan. It is intended to communicate the Town’s anticipated approach to prioritization, coordination, and phased execution rather than to establish rigid deadlines for individual actions.
The timeline reflects the reality that corrective actions vary in complexity, resource requirements, and dependency on external factors such as recruitment, training availability, contractual services, and policy adoption. Accordingly, the phases identified below represent logical groupings of work designed to stabilize operations, strengthen institutional capacity, and integrate long-term improvements in a deliberate and sustainable manner.
As corrective actions progress, timelines may be refined to reflect actual implementation conditions, evolving priorities, or additional findings from expanded analysis. Any such adjustments will be documented in subsequent CAP updates to maintain transparency and accountability.
The Proposed CAP Timeline should be read in conjunction with the Corrective Action Matrix and the public reporting commitments described in Section 8, which together provide a comprehensive picture of how corrective actions will be implemented, monitored, and communicated.
Phase Period Primary Activities
Phase 1: Stabilization November 2025 to
February 2026
Staff reinstatement; FTO engagement, continued
supplemental staffing, initiation of training; organizational restructuring decisions; Corrective Action Plan adoption and initiation.
Phase 2: Infrastructure
Build-Out
December 2025 to
March 2026
Development of revised procedures; permit and inspection procedure rollouts; adoption of new manuals;
implementation of certification requirements; expanded
statistical analysis of inspections, themes and
programmatic needs. Initial advisory review of CAP
implementation progress by Council-authorized Ad Hoc
Committee.
Phase 3: Public Interface
Improvements
February 2026 to
September 2026
Ombudsman role implemented through the Assistant Town
Manager; expanded public guidance; transparency
reporting.
Phase 4: Quality Assurance
Integration
April 2026 to
February 2027
Long-term QA/oversight; system improvements; metrics
reporting; close-out of corrective items.
139
2025 Building Division Audit Corrective Action Plan
February 10, 2026
8. Public Reporting, Transparency, and Advisory Oversight The Town recognizes that transparency, clear reporting, and structured oversight are essential to maintaining public confidence during implementation of the Corrective Action Plan (CAP). In addition to internal management controls and reporting to the Town Council, the Town will use public reporting and advisory oversight mechanisms to provide visibility into CAP progress while preserving appropriate governance roles and operational authority.
8.1 Public Reporting Commitments
The Town will provide periodic public reporting on CAP implementation through Town Council agenda materials, published reports, and other appropriate public-facing communications. These updates will reflect information contained in the Corrective Action Matrix and associated performance measures as of the date of each update.
Public reporting will summarize, at a minimum:
• Changes in Implementation Phase for corrective actions, • Notable actions completed or initiated since the prior update, • Corrective actions that remain ongoing or require sustained implementation, • Key performance indicators or metrics used to evaluate progress, where available, and • Material adjustments to corrective actions or implementation approaches.
CAP updates will emphasize that reported information represents a point-in-time snapshot and that implementation progress may evolve as conditions change, additional data becomes available, or refinements are identified. Completion of individual actions or milestones does not necessarily indicate closure of an entire corrective action unless explicitly stated.
8.2 Adapted Ad Hoc Advisory Committee
In August 2025, the Town Council recommended the formation of a time-limited Ad Hoc Committee to provide input on improvement opportunities related to Building Division operations. With development of this Corrective Action Plan, the Town is now recommending that the Committee’s purpose be adapted to provide structured advisory input focused specifically on CAP implementation.
As adapted, the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee would support transparency and organized stakeholder engagement by reviewing CAP implementation progress, discussing procedural clarity, and considering themes identified through the Corrective Action Matrix, performance metrics, and stakeholder feedback.
The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee would serve in an advisory capacity only. Responsibility for implementation of corrective actions and preparation of CAP updates will remain with Town staff, with oversight and direction provided by the Town Council through established reporting processes. Advisory input does not confer management authority, operational control, or decision-making responsibility.
The Ad Hoc Advisory Committee would be time-limited and focused on CAP implementation during the corrective action period. The Committee’s role would conclude once its advisory purpose related to CAP oversight has been fulfilled, as determined by the Town Council. 140
Town of Paradise
Council Agenda Summary
Date: February 10, 2026
Agenda Item: 6(c)
ORIGINATED BY: Marc Mattox, Assistant Town Manager
REVIEWED BY: Michael O’Brien, Interim Town Manager
SUBJECT: Town Council Request for Committees Review
LONG TERM
RECOVERY PLAN:
No
COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED:
1. Review each committee identified above using the standardized governance questions during the meeting, with staff facilitating the discussion for consistency and clarity.
2. Approve the recommendation to sunset the Onsite Ad Hoc Committee effective immediately.
3. Provide direction that the standardized governance questions (Questions 1–6) be required each time:
a. A new committee is established; or
b. An existing committee is reaffirmed or modified.
4. Direct that the full Committee Inventory be reviewed annually at the time Council assignments are considered each December.
Background:
At the Town Council meeting of January 13, 2026, Council directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of the Town’s committees, including standing committees, ad hoc committees, liaison roles, and external board representations, in order to better understand their purposes, authorities, and alignment with Council’s role as the Town’s legislative body.
Under California law, the Town Council acts collectively as the Town’s legislative authority.
Government Code section 36802 provides that the city council “shall be the legislative body of the city,” and Government Code section 37100 authorizes the Council to exercise legislative powers by ordinance and resolution. Committees established by the Council function as extensions of the legislative body and serve in advisory, coordination, or oversight capacities as determined by Council action.
The Ralph M. Brown Act further defines committees created by a legislative body as legislative bodies themselves in certain circumstances. Government Code section 54952(b) includes within the definition of a legislative body:
“A commission, committee, board, or other body of a local agency, whether permanent or temporary, decision-making or advisory, created by charter, ordinance, resolution, or formal action of a legislative body.”
141
The Brown Act provides a limited exception for ad hoc committees created for a specific and limited purpose that dissolve once that purpose is completed (Gov. Code §54952(b)(1)). Over time, committees that were initially established as ad hoc may evolve in duration, scope, or meeting regularity such that their structure merits reconsideration by the full Council.
Internal committees are intended to support the Council by providing focused review, coordination, or oversight on defined topics. They are not substitutes for Council action, and final policy direction remains with the Council acting as a body in noticed public meetings.
To respond to Council’s January 13 direction, staff prepared a standardized one-page worksheet for each non-external committee to document committee profile information and evaluate structural alignment. These worksheets are attached to this agenda item.
Analysis:
Overview of Assessment Approach
In response to Council direction, staff prepared an updated Committee Inventory and completed standardized one-page worksheets for each non-external committee. The worksheets document committee administration, purpose, meeting practices, and structural alignment using a consistent format and are attached to this agenda item to support a structured, committee-by-committee discussion by the Town Council.
Each worksheet includes:
Committee Profile:
Committee type, method of establishment, purpose statement, meeting cadence, membership, staff support, and documentation responsibilities (agenda, minutes, and records).
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review (screening questions):
A standardized set of questions used to identify where additional Council direction may be needed to confirm or refine governance practices, including scope, reporting expectations, and sunset provisions.
Question 15 on each worksheet (“Should the Committee structure be reviewed by Council?”) serves as a screening tool to identify committees that would benefit from Council discussion regarding their structure and continued operation.
During the meeting, staff will briefly guide the Council through the standardized governance questions for each committee identified for review in order to facilitate consistent discussion and decision-making.
Committees Not Requiring Further Review at This Time
Based on the updated Committee Inventory and responses to Question 15 on the attached worksheets, several internal and liaison committees appear structurally aligned with their intended purpose and do not require further Council review at this time. These committees generally demonstrate:
Clear and limited scopes of work
Liaison or coordination functions rather than policy-direction roles Low staff and Council time intensity
Appropriate alignment with their designated committee type 142
These include:
Paradise Irrigation District Liaison Committee
Paradise Recreation & Park District Liaison Committee Paradise Unified School District Liaison Committee
Paradise Solid Waste Committee
Paradise Sewer Project Ad Hoc Committee
These committees will continue to be included in the annual Committee Inventory review conducted in conjunction with Council assignments each December, but no additional structural review is recommended at this time.
In addition, the Downtown Phase 3 Working Group is scheduled to sunset on Wednesday, February 4, 2026, with stakeholder participation transitioning to the Economic Development Committee. As a result, no further Council review of the Downtown Phase 3 Working Group structure is necessary.
Committees Identified for Council Direction
Based on the updated Inventory and responses to Question 15 on the attached worksheets, the following committees are identified for committee-by-committee Council discussion and direction:
Building Committee
Facilities Ad Hoc Committee
Legislative Ad Hoc Committee
Finance Committee
Economic Development Committee
Healthcare Ad Hoc Committee
Insurance Advocacy Ad Hoc Committee
In addition, based on the assessment findings, staff recommends that the Onsite Ad Hoc Committee be sunset effective immediately, as its original purpose appears complete and ongoing activity is limited. Sunsetting this committee will reduce administrative burden and clarify that related matters should return directly to the full Council or be handled through normal staff reporting channels.
Standard Governance Questions for Council Review
For each committee listed above, staff will guide Council through the following standardized governance questions:
1. Appropriate Forum and Role
Is this topic best addressed by the full Town Council through direct staff reporting, or by a committee in an advisory role that returns recommendations or options to the full Council for direction?
2. Purpose and Scope
What is the clear and limited purpose statement for this committee? What matters fall within the committee’s scope, and what matters should remain with the full Council?
3. Administration and Documentation Responsibilities
o Who serves as Chair or convenor?
143
o Who prepares agendas?
o Who prepares minutes and retains records?
o What level of formal notice and documentation is expected?
4. Meeting Cadence
o Regular schedule (monthly or quarterly), or
o As-needed, tied to defined deliverables?
5. Reporting to the Full Council
o Written updates, verbal reports, or scheduled agenda items? o What issues should trigger return to the Council for direction?
6. Duration and Sunset
o Completion of a defined task or milestone,
o A fixed end date with possible reauthorization, or
o Periodic formal Council review (e.g., annually or biennially)? Staff recommends that the Council:
1. Review each committee identified above using the standardized governance questions during the meeting, with staff facilitating the discussion for consistency and clarity;
2. Approve the recommendation to sunset the Onsite Ad Hoc Committee effective immediately;
3. Provide direction that the standardized governance questions (Questions 1–6) be required each time:
o A new committee is established, or
o An existing committee is reaffirmed or modified; and
4. Direct that the full Committee Inventory be reviewed annually at the time Council assignments are considered each December, to confirm:
o Which committees remain necessary,
o Whether their purposes and structures remain appropriate, and o Whether any committees should be modified or sunset as part of the annual appointment process.
Adopting this approach will promote consistency, transparency, and efficiency in committee formation and operation and will provide a clear framework for both current and future Council actions related to committees.
Financial Impact:
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this agenda item. The committee assessment focuses on governance structure, roles, and alignment rather than programmatic or budgetary decisions.
Potential indirect benefits include improved efficiency of staff time, clearer expectations for Council participation, and reduced administrative burden through better alignment of committee structure with purpose. Any future Council actions resulting from this review (such as restructuring or sunset of committees) would be brought forward separately with appropriate fiscal analysis, if applicable.
144
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A N/A
N/A
1 Representative, 1 Alternate
N/A
N/A
1x per month, BCAG Offices
1-2 hours
N/A
External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Air Quality Management District
Steve Crowder
Ron Lassonde
None
Question
BCAQMD staff
BCAQMD staff
BCAQMD staff
The Butte County Air Quality Management District board establishes policies & approves new rules to protect people & environment from the effects of air pollution.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
Rotating
BCAQMD staff, jurisdiction elected officials
145
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Association of Governments
BCAG staff, jurisdiction elected officials
N/A
N/A
1x per month, BCAG Offices
1-2 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Representative, 1 Alternate
Steve Crowder
Ron Lassonde
None
Question
Rotating
BCAG staff
BCAG staff
BCAG staff
The Butte County Association of Governments board is responsible for development of federal and state transportation plans and programs that secure transportation funding for the region's highways, transit, streets/roads, and, pedestrian and other transportation system improvements.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
146
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
City Selection Committee
City Mayors
N/A
N/A
1x per year
1-2 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mayor
Steve Crowder
N/A
N/A
Question
Unknown
County Clerk
County Clerk
County Clerk
Meets once a year, and are responsible for appointing representatives of the Airport Land Use Commission, and LAFCo.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
147
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
City/County Ad Hoc Committee
Two members of the Board of Supervisors and various staff.
N/A
N/A
Unknown
Unknown
N/A
N/A
N/A
One Councilmember
Steve Culleton
N/A
N/A
Question
County staff
County staff
County staff
County staff
The City/County Ad Hoc Committee was formed to discuss issues/topics of common concern associated with the Paradise Ridge Area.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
148
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte Countywide Homeless Continuum of Care
Multi-jurisdiction staff, community stakeholders, other elected officials N/A
N/A
1x per month, County Offices
2 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Representative, 1 Alternate
Heidi Lange
Steve Culleton
None
Question
County staff
County staff
County staff
County staff
The Butte Countywide Homeless Continuum of Care (CoC) is a multi-agency planning body with the common goal of ending homelessness. This goal will be accomplished by assisting individuals and families experiencing homelessness receive rapid, adaptive, quality services which lead to the long-term stability of permanent housing and self-sufficiency.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
149
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Disaster Council
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mayor
Steve Crowder
N/A
Question
The purpose of the Disaster Council is to provide for the preparation and execution of plans for the protection of persons, the environment, and property within the County of Butte in the event of an emergency.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
150
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Fire Safe Council
BCFSC staff
N/A
N/A
1x per month, Butte College Chico Campus
2 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Representative, 1 Alternate
Heidi Lange
Steve Culleton
None
Question
BCFSC staff
BCFSC staff
BCFSC staff
BCFSC staff
Butte County Fire Safe Council provides wildland fire mitigation and recovery services to the communities of Butte County.
Their mission is to provide safety in Butte County through wildfire hazard education, mitigation and wildlife recovery.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
151
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Mosquito & Vector Control Board
BCMVCD staff, elected officials
N/A
N/A
1x per month, Chico
1-2 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Councilmember
Melissa Schuster (Community member appointed by Council through 01/2027) N/A
None
Question
Rotating elected officials
BCMVCD staff
BCMVCD staff
BCMVCD staff
The purpose of the eleven (11) trustee board is to set policy for the 1600 square mile district concerning Mosquito and Vector control. The mission of BCMVCD is to reduce mosquito-transmitted disease and other vector associated diseases through environmentally compatible control practices and public education.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
152
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte Local Agency Formation Commission
Elected officials, LAFCo staff
N/A
N/A
1x per month, Oroville City Council Chambers
1-2 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Councilmember
Greg Bolin
N/A
None
Question
Rotating elected officials
LAFCo staff
LAFCo staff
LAFCo staff
LAFCo is a State mandated local agency composed of seven regular Commissioners: two members from the Butte County Board of Supervisors (selected by the entire Board); two members from the city councils (selected by the mayors of all five incorporated cities); two members who represent special districts (selected by a majority vote of independent special districts); and one public member (selected by the other six LAFCo members). The LAFCo board oversees boundary changes to cities and special districts, the formation of new agencies including incorporation of new cities, and consolidation of existing agencies.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
153
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Paradise Community Village
Youth for Change; Paradise Youth Soccer Club; and, the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP). 2003
Unknown
Varies
Varies
Unknown
None
None
1 Councilmember
Greg Bolin
N/A
Recovery & Economic Development Director
Question
PCV
PCV staff
PCV staff
PCV staff
Formed to oversee the development of the Paradise Community Village project.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
154
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Tourism & Business Improvement District
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1 Councilmember
Ron Lassonde
N/A
Recovery & Economic Development Director
Question
The Butte County Tourism Business Improvement District (BCTBID) is an assessment district that provides specific benefits to payors, by funding marketing and sales promotion efforts for assessed businesses. The Butte County Tourism Business Improvement District was formed in November 2015 and includes the communities of Chico, Oroville, Paradise, Biggs, and the unincorporated area of Butte County. The annual assessment rate is two percent (2%) of gross short-term room rental revenue. Utilizing assessment funds collected, Explore Butte County intends to strategically market the region with the goal of increasing overnight stays. This is only an advisory position, and an appointment is at the discretion of the Town Council.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
155
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Consolidated Oversight Board
Health & Safety Code Designees pursuant to Section 34179(j) - various appointments across sectors 2012
N/A
1x per year in January, County Board of Supervisors Chambers 2-3 hours
N/A
N/A
N/A
Mayor
Steve Crowder
N/A
None
Question
Rotating selection
County staff
County staff
County staff
The Countywide Oversight Board has fiduciary responsibility to holders of enforceable obligations and the taxing entities that benefit from distributions of property tax and other revenues. (Oversight Board to the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency.)
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
156
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) N/A
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) N/A
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) N/A
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) N/A
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) N/A
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) N/A
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) N/A
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A External - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Butte County Waste Management Local Task Force
Local haulers and staff representation from County jurisdictions N/A
N/A
2x per year upon notification
1 hour
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Councilmembers
Greg Bolin, Steve Culleton
N/A
CDD Director - Planning & Wastewater
Question
Butte County NRRWF Staff
None prepared
None prepared
Butte County staff
The Local Task Force is a mandated committee formed by the Board of Supervisors; develops goals, policies & procedures which are consistent with guidelines & regulations adopted by the CA Integrated Waste Management Act relating to coordinated & cost-effective regional waste management issues/solutions.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
157
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) Yes
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) No
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) No
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Information Sharing
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) No
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Well aligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No Liaison - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
TOP-PID Liaison Committee
PID Board Members & Staff
1979
Unknown
Quarterly
1 hour
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Greg Bolin, Ron Lassonde
N/A
Town Manager, Public Works Director/Town Engineer
Question
Hosting entity administrator (Town Manager or District Manager) Town Clerk
Town Clerk
Town Clerk
Discuss issues of common concern
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
158
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) Yes
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) No
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) No
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Information Sharing
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) No
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Well aligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No Liaison - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
TOP-PUSD Liaison Committee
PUSD Board Members & Staff
January 14, 2025
Minute order
Quarterly
1 hour
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Greg Bolin, Heidi Lange
N/A
Town Manager, Recovery & Economic Development Director, Public Works Director/Town Engineer Question
Hosting entity administrator (Town Manager or District Manager) Town Clerk
Town Clerk
Town Clerk
Discuss issues of common concern
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
159
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) Yes
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) No
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) No
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Information Sharing
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) No
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Well aligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No Liaison - Standing Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
TOP-PRPD Liaison Committee
PRPD Board Members & Staff
Prior to 2000
Unknown
Quarterly
1 hour
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Steve Crowder, Steve Culleton
N/A
Town Manager, Public Works Director/Town Engineer
Question
Hosting entity administrator (Town Manager or District Manager) Town Clerk
Town Clerk
Town Clerk
Discuss issues of common concern
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
160
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Many
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) 5-15
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Mixed
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) N/A
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) N/A
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Building Stakeholder Committee
To be determined
August 12, 2025
Minute order
Unknown
Unknown
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Steve Crowder, Heidi Lange
N/A
Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, CDD Director - Building & Code Enforcement Question
None identified
Unknown
Unknown
Town staff
Original formation language was to enhance the Building Department’s inspection practices for review and discussion at the October (2025) Town Council meeting. The Committee has not met yet nor other stakeholders been identified.
Recommend adaptation to provide oversight and engagement within the Building Division Corrective Action Plan.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
161
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) Yes
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Mixed
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) Yes
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) Yes
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Well aligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Downtown Phase 3 Working Group
Paradise Chamber of Commerce, PATCH, Rebuild Paradise Foundation, Realtor, Consultant staff June 10, 2025
Minute order
3x per year, Town Hall
1-2 hours
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Ron Lassonde, Heidi Lange
N/A
Town Manager, Recovery & Economic Development Director, CDD Director - Planning & Wastewater Question
None identified
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work Present a strategic plan to council which will include 1-, 3-, and 5-year measurable steps and a menu of potential actions Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
162
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) Yes
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) N/A
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) N/A
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) N/A
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Mixed
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) Yes
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) N/A
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Mixed
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Economic Development Committee
Paradise Chamber of Commerce, PATCH, Business Owners, Realtors January 13, 2026
Minute order
Unknown, Town Hall
Unknown
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Steve Crowder, Heidi Lange
N/A
Town Manager, Recovery & Economic Development Director
Question
None identified
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work N/A. Recently formed, has not met yet.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
163
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Policy Exploration
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) No
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Mixed Alignment
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Healthcare Committee
None
December 13, 2022
Minute order
3-4x per year, Town Hall
1 hour
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Steve Crowder, Ron Lassonde
N/A
Town Manager, Recovery & Economic Development Director
Question
None identified
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work The Healthcare Committee was established to return Emergency Services and other Health Care facilities to Paradise. The committee reports to and receives direction from the Council.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
164
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Low
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Medium
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Mixed
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) Yes
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Mixed alignment
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Facilities Committee
None
February 11, 2025
Minute order
As needed, Town Hall
1 hour
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Greg Bolin, Steve Culleton
N/A
Town Manager, Public Works Director/Town Engineer, other staff as directed Question
Public Works Director/Town Engineer
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work Review and advise on next steps relating to the Town of Paradise’s overall facilities as well as facilities replacement needs resulting from the 2018 Camp Fire.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
165
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Medium
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Mixed
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) Yes
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Mixed alignment
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Finance Committee
None
2001
Ordinance
Quarterly
1 hour
None identified
None
None
Mayor & Vice Mayor
Steve Crowder, Steve Culleton
N/A
Town Manager, Assistant Town Manager, Finance Director
Question
Town Manager
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work Established by Paradise Municipal Code Section 2.16.030, the finance and investment committee shall provide oversight of the town's financial, public financing and investment activities and ensure that all such activities are in accordance with all applicable state and local laws, regulations and policies.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
166
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) Yes
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Low
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Low
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) Policy Exploration
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) Yes
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Well aligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Insurance Advocacy Committee
Paradise Chamber of Commerce, Insurance Professionals, Realtors, Community Groups, Member at Large October 14, 2025
Minute Order
Unknown, Town Hall
1 hour
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Greg Bolin, Heidi Lange
N/A
Town Manager, Recovery & Economic Development Director
Question
None identified
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work To bring together industry experts, community partners, and local stakeholders to identify and implement practical steps our community can take to become more insurable; and, actively engage with insurance providers to explore solutions that make homeowners insurance more accessible and affordable for residents.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
167
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) Yes
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Some
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) External Representation
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) Yes
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Mixed aligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Legislative Committee
None
February 14, 2023
Minute order
3-4x per year, Town Hall
1 hour
None identified
None
None
Mayor & Vice Mayor
Steve Crowder, Steve Culleton
N/A
Town Manager, Recovery & Economic Development Director
Question
Recovery & Economic Development Director
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work To track state and federal legislation and administrative regulation that have an impact on the Town. The Committee is tasked with representing the Town before legislative and regulatory bodies to work with elected and appointed officials to make recommendations on legislative advocacy issues that benefit the Town and its residents. Committee members regularly report to the Council regarding state and federal legislation that may impact the Town and seek direction from the Town Council as to what position they should take when interacting with elected and appointed officials.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review
168
Category
Committee Name
Type
Date Established
Method of Establishment
Meeting Frequency & Location(s)
Typical Meeting Length
Sunset Date/Trigger
Town Budget Authority
Town Policy Authority
Representation Standard
Active Primary Representative(s)
Active Alternate Representative
Staff Participants
External Participants
Committee Chair Responsibility
Agenda Preparation Responsibility
Minutes Preparation Responsibility
Records Retention Responsibility
Purpose Statement (if available) or
Committee Description and other
important notes.
Response
1. Does the Committee's function match its designated type (External/Standing/Ad Hoc/Liaison)? (Yes/Partially/No) Yes
2. Does the Committee have continuing subject matter jurisdiction? (Yes/No) Yes
3. Does the Committee have a fixed schedule by formal action? (Yes/No) No
4. Does the original need for the Committee still exist? (Yes/No) No
5. Does the Committee overlap with another Committee or Body? (Yes/No) No
6. Are there tangible outputs of the Committee within the last 12 months? (Many, some, low) Low
7. Are there forecasted outputs of the Committee within the next 12 months? (Many, some, low) Low
8. What are the estimated staff hours per month dedicated to this Committee? (less than 5, 5-15, 15-30 or 30+) Less than 5
9. What is the level of time intensity for Council representatives? (High, medium, low) Low
10. Which of the following best describes the Committee’s primary function? (Information sharing, oversight/monitoring, policy exploration, external representation, mixed) No
11. Does the Committee routinely discuss matters that would otherwise require full Council policy direction or action? (Yes/No) No
12. Is the Committee providing regular and documented updates to the full Town Council? (Yes/No) No
13. Has the sunset or trigger date for Committee conclusion been reviewed within the last two years? (Yes/No) No
14. What is the overall structural alignment assessment? (Well aligned, mixed alignment, misaligned) Misaligned
15. Based on the above information, should the Committee structure be reviewed by the full Town Council? (Yes/No) Yes Internal - Ad Hoc Committee
Town of Paradise
Town Council Committees Inventory & Assessment
Committee Profile
Response
Onsite Ad Hoc Committee
None
September 3, 2008
Minute order
As needed
Unknown
None identified
None
None
2 Councilmembers
Greg Bolin, Steve Crowder
N/A
CDD Director - Planning & Wastewater
Question
None identified
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
No Agendas/Minutes are prepared
Various records are retained by staff for implementation actions/normal course of work Meets as needed to keep Council representatives informed of issues & long-term effects of proposed changes to the Manual for Onsite Treatment of Wastewater (Onsite Manual). Staff is unaware of last meeting held by this Committee and could be formally disbanded.
Internal Committee Structural Fit Review