Exclusions:
If there are any issues with the use of the existing wiring, EPW will notify the customer and issue a change order accordingly.
Attachments:
• Site Map
• Quote
24/7 Alarm Monitoring Services - Verkada Alarms
Solution Overview
EPW will implement Verkada's cloud-managed alarm system across the City's designated facilities. The service includes 24/7 professional monitoring by Verkada-authorized agents who receive alarm events, verify via live video, notify designated contacts, and dispatch emergency services when necessary.
Monitoring Centers & Certifications
Services are delivered from UL 827-listed, TMA Five-Diamond-certified monitoring centers staffed 24/7/365.
Licensed Monitoring Tiers
Each site holds one Verkada Advanced Alarm license which includes camera-based triggers with live video verification. Alarm triggered from events such as intrusion sensor activation, access control breaches, and camera analytics (e.g., motion/person detection) can all raise alarms.
Response Flows
Three options per site: (1) Notification Only, (2) Standard (call before dispatch), (3) Immediate Dispatch. Live talk-down and siren activation supported with appropriate BZ11 Horn Speaker.
Video Verification & False Alarm Reduction
Advanced licenses allow agents encrypted access to video for real-time verification, minimizing false alarms.
Customer Obligations
City is responsible for correct arming/disarming, maintaining an up-to-date contact list, and managing alarm frequency.
Data Security & Privacy
All video and data are encrypted in transit and at rest. Agent access is limited and logged.
System Health & Support
EPW and City staff can monitor system health via Verkada Command. Hardware includes up to a 10-year warranty.
Service-Level Commitment
Monitoring agents respond to alarms within an average of 30 seconds.
Limitation of Liability
EPW's liability is limited to 60 months of licensing fees. Not responsible for disarmed alarms, misconfigurations, or external outages.
Grand Total $74,835.05
Tax $3,826.95
Total Price $71,008.10
Product List Price Sales
Price Quantity Discount(Percentage) Total Price
Verkada 5-Year CH52 Multisensor Camera License, Capacity Increase $2,699.00 $2,699.00 3.00 20.00% $6,477.60 Verkada 5-Year Horn Speaker License $899.00 $899.00 1.00 20.00% $719.20 Verkada 5-Year AC Door License $999.00 $999.00 1.00 20.00% $799.20 Verkada 5-Year Cellular Gateway License $1,349.00 $1,349.00 3.00 20.00% $3,237.60 Verkada 5-Year Standard Alarm License $7,500.00 $7,500.00 1.00 20.00% $6,000.00 Verkada CH52-E Outdoor Multisensor Camera, 8TB, 365 Days Max $12,699.00 $12,699.00 3.00 20.00% $30,477.60 Verkada - BZ11 Horn Speaker $799.00 $799.00 1.00 20.00% $639.20 Verkada - Pendant Cap Mount $69.00 $69.00 3.00 20.00% $165.60 Verkada ACC-MNT-XLARM-1: Large Arm Mount $159.00 $192.00 3.00 20.00% $460.80 Verkada - Pole Mount $209.00 $209.00 4.00 20.00% $668.80 Verkada PoE++ (802.3bt-2018) Injector, GigE $149.00 $149.00 3.00 20.00% $357.60 Verkada - GC31 indoor gateway $899.00 $899.00 3.00 20.00% $2,157.60 Verkada AC12 One-Door Controller $699.00 $699.00 1.00 20.00% $559.20 Verkada AD34 Multi-format Card Reader $349.00 $349.00 1.00 20.00% $279.20 Verkada 4AH Backup Battery $129.00 $129.00 1.00 20.00% $103.20 TRENDnet 5-Port Gigabit EdgeSmart PoE+ Switch $95.00 $121.00 4.00 0.00% $484.00 GRI 4400-A Industrial Surface Mount Switch Set, 2-1/2" Standard Gap, 10W, 200VDC, 0.50A, Closed Loop, N/O, and 36" Armored Cable, Aluminum- Door Contact
$63.00 $63.00 1.00 0.00% $63.00
Genesis Riser Composite Access Control Cable, Shielded, CL3R, FPLR, CMR, FT4, Sunlight Resistant, 1000' (304.8m), Reel, Yellow Banana $1,114.00 $1,047.00 0.10 0.00% $104.70 ADI - Quiktron Q-Series CAT6 Patch Cable,Booted, 10' (0.9m), Blue $3.00 $8.00 5.00 0.00% $40.00 3/4 in. x 10 ft. Electric Metallic Tube (EMT) Conduit $16.00 $16.00 4.00 0.00% $64.00 Skyjack 32ft Scissor Lift $930.00 $930.00 1.00 $930.00
EMT Miscellaneous $100.00 $50.00 1.00 $50.00
Locksmithing Parts $154.00 $154.00 20.00 $3,080.00
Camera Labor Installation $154.00 $154.00 44.00 $6,776.00 Access Control Labor $154.00 $154.00 41.00 $6,314.00
End-Point Wireless
30141 Antelope Road
Menifee, California 92584
(800) 276-0415
STANDARD COMMERCIAL SECURITY AGREEMENT
Date: 2024-07/14/25
SUBSCRIBER: City of Paramount
AUTHORIZED CONTACT: Grissel Chavez
Contact email: [email protected]
Address: 7718 Somerset Blvd Paramount, CA 90723
1. END-POINT WIRELESS (hereinafter referred to as “End-Point Wireless”) agrees to sell, install and program, at Subscriber's premises, and Subscriber agrees to buy, an electronic security system consisting of the equipment and services described in the attached Schedule of Equipment and Services. As well as any and all services performed by or on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS shall comply with all applicable local, State and federal laws, statutes, regulations and orders.
2. All recurring charges are detailed in the quote section of this document and are to be billed monthly. Subscriber agrees to pay End-Point Wireless via automatic scheduled payments the following sum listed per month for the term of this agreement: $0.00 All recurring charges are detailed in the quote section of this document and billed yearly. Subscriber agrees to pay END-POINT WIRELESS the following sum listed per 5th year for the term of this agreement: $17,233.60
3. TERM OF AGREEMENT: Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, the term of this agreement shall be for a period of 60 month(s) and shall automatically renew month to month thereafter under the same terms and conditions for up to twelve (12) additional one month periods, unless either party gives written notice to the other by certified mail, return receipt requested, of their intention not to renew the agreement at least 30 days prior to the expiration of any term. END-POINT WIRELESS may invoice Subscriber in advance monthly, quarterly, or annually at END-POINT’s option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscriber may terminate this agreement at any time with or without cause or penalty by providing END-POINT WIRELESS not less than sixty (60) days’ prior, written notice. Any prepaid but unearned fees shall be promptly refunded to Subscriber.
4. CENTRAL OFFICE MONITORING SERVICES: (a) Upon receipt of a signal from Subscriber’s alarm system, END-POINT WIRELESS or its designee central office shall make every reasonable effort to notify Subscriber and the appropriate municipal police or fire department depending upon the type of signal received (“Monitoring Services” sometimes herein). Not all signals will require notification to the authorities and subscribers may obtain a written response policy from END-POINT WIRELESS. No response shall be required for supervisory, loss of communication pathway, trouble or low battery signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals transmitted from Subscriber's premises directly to municipal police or fire departments are not monitored by personnel of END-POINT WIRELESS or END-POINT WIRELESS's designee central office and END-POINT WIRELESS does not assume any responsibility for the manner in which such signals are monitored or the response, if any, to such signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals which are transmitted over telephone lines, wire, air waves, internet, VOIP, radio or cellular, or other modes of communication pass through communication networks wholly beyond the control of END-POINT WIRELESS and are not maintained by END-POINT WIRELESS except END-POINT WIRELESS may own the radio network, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any failure which prevents transmission signals from reaching the central office monitoring center or damages arising therefrom, or for data corruption, theft or viruses to Subscriber’s computers if connected to the alarm communication equipment. Subscriber agrees to furnish END-POINT WIRELESS with a written Call List of names and telephone numbers of those persons Subscriber wishes to receive notification of alarm signals.
Unless otherwise provided in the Call List END-POINT WIRELESS will make a reasonable effort to contact the first person reached or notified on the list either via telephone call, text or email message.
All changes and revisions shall be supplied to END-POINT WIRELESS in writing. Subscriber authorizes END-POINT WIRELESS to access the control panel to input or delete data and programming. If the equipment contains video or listening devices permitting central office to monitor video or sound then upon receipt of an alarm signal central office shall monitor video or sound for so long as central office in its sole discretion deems appropriate to confirm an alarm condition. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to remotely activate or deactivate the system, change combinations, openings or closings, or re-program system functions, Subscriber shall pay ENDPOINT WIRELESS $125.00 for each such service. END-POINT WIRELESS may, upon not less than three (3) business days’ prior written notice, prior notice, suspend or terminate its services, in central office’s sole discretion, in event of Subscriber’s default in performance of this agreement or in event central office facility or communication network is nonoperational or the Subscriber’s alarm system transmits more than 10 signals within a 24-hour period without legitimate cause, such transmissions shall be deemed excessive. Central office is authorized to record and maintain audio and video transmissions, data and communications, and shall be the exclusive owner of such property. All Subscriber information and data made accessible to, or stored or handled by END-POINT WIRELESS (“Subscriber Data”),shall be maintained confidentially by END-POINT WIRELESS. (b) Without limiting END-POINT WIRELESS’s obligation of confidentiality as further described herein, END-POINT WIRELESS shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining a data privacy and information security program, including physical, technical, administrative, and organizational safeguards, that comply with or are substantially similar to the security controls identified in the current version of NIST SP800-53, and that is designed to: (a) ensure the security and confidentiality of Subscriber Data; (b) protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of Subscriber Data; (c) protect against unauthorized disclosure, access to, or use of Subscriber Data; (d) ensure the proper disposal of Subscriber Data; and, (e) ensure that all employees, agents, and subcontractors of END-POINT WIRELESS, if any, comply with all of the foregoing. All Subscriber Data, whether in motion, in use, or at rest, shall be encrypted from end to end. In no case shall the safeguards of END-POINT WIRELESS’s data privacy and information security program used to protect Subscriber Data be less stringent than the safeguards used by END-POINT WIRELESS for its own data.
(c) END-POINT WIRELESS is provided a limited license to access Subscriber Data for the sole and exclusive purpose of providing the Services, including a license to collect, process, store, generate, and display Subscriber Data only to the extent necessary in the providing of the Services. ENDPOINT WIRELESS shall: (a) keep and maintain Subscriber Data in strict confidence, using such degree of care as is appropriate and consistent with its obligations as further described in this Agreement and applicable law to avoid unauthorized access, use, disclosure, or loss; (b) use and disclose Subscriber Data solely and exclusively for the purpose of providing the Services in accordance with this Agreement and applicable law; (c) allow access to Subscriber Data only to those employees of END- POINT WIRELESS who are directly involved with and responsible for providing the Services; and, (d) not use, sell, rent, transfer, distribute, or otherwise disclose or make available Subscriber Data for END-POINT WIRELESS’s own purposes or for the benefit of anyone other than Subscriber without Subscriber’s prior written consent. END-POINT WIRELESS may not utilize aggregated data derived from Subscriber Data unless it has been made “anonymous” using technology that irreversibly alters data in such a way that the data subject can no longer be identified directly or indirectly, either by the data controller alone or in collaboration with any other party, and such data is thereby rendered “anonymized data”, as generally described in ISO 25237:2017, Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
5. SERVICE: Service includes all parts and labor, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall service upon Subscriber's request the security system installed in Subscriber's premises between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, within reasonable time after receiving notice from Subscriber that service is required, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. All repairs, replacement or alteration to the security system made by reason of alteration to Subscriber’s premises, or caused by unauthorized intrusion, lightning or electrical surge, or caused by any means other than normal usage, wear and tear, shall be made at the cost of the Subscriber. Batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer's useful life are not included in service and will be repaired or replaced at Subscriber's expense payable at time of service. No apparatus or device shall be attached to or connected with the security system as originally installed without End-Point's written consent. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
6. SUBSCRIBER REMOTE ACCESS: If Remote Access is included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services to be installed and services provided by END-POINT WIRELESS, the equipment will transmit data via Subscriber's high speed Internet, cellular or radio communication service from remote pendant supplied by END-POINT WIRELESS or Subscriber's Internet or wireless connection device which is compatible with END-POINT's remote services. END-POINT WIRELESS will grant access to a server permitting Subscriber to monitor the security system, access the system to arm, disarm and bypass zones on the system, view the remote video camera(s) and control other remote automation devices that may be installed. The remote services server is provided either by ENDPOINT WIRELESS or a third party. END-POINT WIRELESS shall install the camera(s) in a permissible legal location in Subscriber's premises to permit Subscriber viewing. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no responsibility for failure of data transmission, corruption or unauthorized access and shall not monitor or view the camera data. Electronic data may not be encrypted and wireless components of the alarm system may not meet Advanced Encryption Standard specifications for encryption of electronic data established by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for access to the alarm system by others. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
7. WIRELESS AND INTERNET ACCESS CAPABILITIES: Subscriber is responsible for supplying high speed Internet access and or wireless services at Subscriber's premises. END-POINT WIRELESS does not provide Internet service, maintain Internet connection, wireless access or communication pathways, computer, smart phone, electric current connection or supply, or in all cases the remote video server. In consideration of Subscriber making its monthly payments for remote access to the system END-POINT WIRELESS will authorize Subscriber access. END-POINT WIRELESS is not responsible for Subscriber's access to the Internet or any interruption of service or down time of remote access caused by loss of Internet service, radio or cellular or any other mode of communication used by Subscriber to access the system. Subscriber acknowledges that Subscriber's security system can be compromised if the codes or devices used for access are lost or accessed by others and END-POINT WIRELESS.
8. ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATION AND LIMITATIONS: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services, Access Control equipment shall be connected to a computer supplied by the Subscriber and connected to Subscriber’s computer network. If data storage or backup is selected, service END-POINT WIRELESS or its designee shall store and /or backup data received from Subscriber’s system for a period of one year and shall make such data available for download by Subscriber at no cost during such period. Thereafter, all such data shall be permanently deleted. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for data corruption or inability to retrieve data even if caused by END-POINT WIRELESS's negligence.
Subscriber’s data shall be maintained confidential as required in Section 4(c), and shall be retrieved and released only to Subscriber or upon Subscriber's authorization or by legal process. Internet access is not provided by END-POINT WIRELESS and END-POINT WIRELESS has no responsibility for such access or IP address service. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for unauthorized access to the system through the Internet or other communication networks or data corruption or loss for any reason whatsoever. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
9. (a) ACCESS CONTROL ADMINISTRATION: If selected as a service to be provided END-POINT WIRELESS will maintain the data base for the operation of the Access Control System. Subscriber will advise END-POINT WIRELESS of all changes in personnel and or changes access levels of authorization and restrictions, providing Access card serial numbers or biometric data and such information that Subscriber deems necessary to identify personnel. All communication by a subscriber to END-POINT WIRELESS regarding personnel access must be in writing via email or fax to addresses designated by END-POINT WIRELESS. END POINT WIRELESS shall have remote internet access to the Subscriber's designated access control computer to program and make database updates to the system. Subscriber is responsible for maintaining its computer and computer network and Internet access
(b) VIDEO SYSTEM OPERATION AND LIMITATIONS: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services. Video equipment is attached to a digital recorder computer and Subscriber shall not use the computer for any other purpose. Subscriber shall be permitted to access and make changes to the system’s operation on site and over the internet. If data storage is a selected service, END-POINT WIRELESS shall store data received from Subscriber's system for one year. and shall make such data available for download by Subscriber at no cost during such period. Thereafter, all such data shall be permanently deleted. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for data corruption or inability to retrieve data unless caused by END-POINT WIRELESS’s negligence or willful misconduct. Subscriber’s data shall be maintained confidential as required in Section 4(c) and shall be retrieved and released only to Subscriber or upon Subscriber’s authorization or by legal process. Telephone or internet access is not provided by END-POINT WIRELESS and END-POINT WIRELESS has no responsibility for such access or IP address service If system has remote access END-POINT WIRELESS is not responsible for the security or privacy of any wireless network system or router, and it is the Subscriber’s responsibility to secure access to the system with pass codes and lockouts. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for unauthorized access to the system through the internet or other communication networks or data corruption or loss for any reason whatsoever (unless gross negligence or willful misconduct by EPW). All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
10. STREAMING VIDEO DATA / CCTV / EXCESSIVE DATA USAGE: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment, upon receipt of a video signal the video system is designed to activate in the central station and record video data reception, upon which, ENDPOINT WIRELESS or its designee central office, shall make every reasonable effort to notify Subscriber by email, text, or voice message and the appropriate municipal police or fire department.
Subscriber acknowledges that signals transmitted from Subscriber's premises directly to municipal police or fire departments or Subscriber's internal security stations are not monitored by personnel of END-POINT WIRELESS or END-POINT WIRELESS designee central office and END-POINT WIRELESS does not assume any responsibility for the manner in which such signals are monitored or the response, if any, to such signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals which are transmitted through the internet, over telephone lines, wire, air waves, cellular, radio, internet, VOIP, or other modes of communication pass through communication networks wholly beyond the control of ENDPOINT WIRELESS may own the radio network, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any failure which prevents transmission signals from reaching the central office monitoring center or damages arising therefrom, or for data corruption, theft or viruses to Subscriber’s computers if connected to the alarm communication equipment. Subscriber agrees to furnish END-POINT WIRELESS with a written list of names and telephone numbers of those persons Subscriber wishes to receive notification of signals. All changes and revisions shall be supplied to END-POINT WIRELESS in writing. Subscriber authorizes END-POINT WIRELESS to access the supervisory panel to input or delete data and programming. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to remotely activate or deactivate the system, change combinations, openings or closings, or re-program system functions, Subscriber shall pay END-POINT WIRELESS $75.00 for each such service. END-POINT WIRELESS may, upon not less than three (3) business days prior written notice, suspend or terminate its services, in central station’s sole discretion, in event of Subscriber’s default in performance of this agreement or in event central station facility or communication network is nonoperational or Subscriber’s alarm system transmitting more than 10 false alarm signals within a 24-hour period. Central station is authorized to record and maintain audio and video transmissions, data and communications, and shall be the exclusive owner of such property. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for excessive data usage expense incurred by Subscriber attributable to the equipment or services provided herein. All Subscriber information and data shall be maintained confidentially by END-POINT WIRELESS as required in Section 4(c).
11. GUARD RESPONSE: If guard response is specified as a service to be provided, upon receipt of an alarm signal, END-POINT WIRELESS or its subcontractor shall as soon as may be practical send one or more of its guards to the Subscriber's premises. Unless guard determines that the alarm is a false alarm and that no situation requiring police or fire department services exist, the guard shall notify the central station or police or fire department directly that an emergency situation exists and wait up to 15 minutes for the municipal police or fire department personnel or Subscriber to arrive at the premises and if permitted by the police shall assist in making a search of the premises to determine the cause of the alarm condition. If provided with keys to the premises the guard shall endeavor to secure the premises and repair the security equipment. However, Subscriber acknowledges that the guard is not required to enter the premises or to render any service to the security equipment and shall not be required to remain stationed at Subscriber's premises for more than 15 minutes after initial arrival. Subscriber authorizes the guard to take such action the guard deems necessary to secure the premises and reset the alarm, though Subscriber acknowledges that the guard may not be able to or may not have sufficient time to secure the premises or reset the alarm and put same in working order. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to station its guard at the premises for more than 30 minutes, and END-POINT WIRELESS has sufficient personnel to provide such service, and END-POINT WIRELESS makes no such representation that its personnel will be available, then Subscriber agrees to pay END-POINT WIRELESS $65.00 per half hour plus tax for such service. Subscriber agrees to confirm the request to END-POINT WIRELESS to provide extended guard service by email, text or recorded conversation to ENDPOINT WIRELESS at the time request is made and END-POINT WIRELESS is authorized to ignore any request not confirmed within 15 minutes.
12. LIMITED WARRANTY ON SALE: In the event that any part of the security system becomes defective, or in the event that any repairs are required, END-POINT WIRELESS agrees to make all repairs and replacement of parts without costs to the Subscriber for a period of three hundred and sixty five (365) days from the date of installation. END-POINT WIRELESS reserves the option to either replace or repair the alarm equipment, and reserves the right to substitute materials of equal quality at time of replacement, or to use reconditioned parts in fulfillment of this warranty. This warranty does not include batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices that are no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer’s useful life. END-POINT WIRELESS is not the manufacturer of the equipment and other than END-POINT WIRELESS’s limited warranty Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to the manufacturer of the equipment for repairs under its warranty coverage if any. Except as set forth in this agreement, END-POINT WIRELESS makes no express warranties as to any matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the equipment, its merchantability, or its fitness for any particular purpose. END-POINT WIRELESS does not represent nor warrant that the security system may not be compromised or circumvented, or that the system will prevent any loss by burglary, hold-up, or otherwise; or that the system will in all cases provide the protection for which it is installed. END-POINT WIRELESS expressly disclaims any implied warranties, including implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
The warranty does not cover any damage to material or equipment caused by accident, misuse, attempted or unauthorized repair service, modification, or improper installation by anyone other than END-POINT WIRELESS. Except as otherwise provided herein, END POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for consequential damages. Subscriber acknowledges that any affirmation of fact or promise made by END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be deemed to create an express warranty unless included in this agreement in writing; that Subscriber is not relying on END-POINT WIRELESS's skill or judgment in selecting or furnishing a system suitable for any particular purpose and that there are no warranties which extend beyond those on the face of this agreement, and that END-POINT WIRELESS has offered additional and more sophisticated equipment for an additional charge which Subscriber has declined. Except as otherwise provided herein with respect to END-POINT WIRELESS’ installation activities causing bodily injury, death or property damage. Subscriber's exclusive remedy for END-POINT WIRELESS's breach of this agreement or negligence to any degree under this agreement is to require END-POINT WIRELESS to repair or replace, at ENDPOINT WIRELESS’s option, any equipment which is non-operational. This Limited Warranty is independent of and in addition to service contracted under paragraph 2 of this agreement. This Limited Warranty gives Subscriber specific legal rights and Subscriber may also have other rights which vary from state to state. If required by law, END-POINT WIRELESS will procure all permits required by local law and will provide certificate of worker’s compensation prior to starting work. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
13. GENERAL PROVISIONS DELAY IN DELIVERY / INSTALLATION / RISK OF LOSS OF MATERIAL: END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for any damage or loss sustained by Subscriber as a result of delay in delivery and/or installation of equipment, equipment failure, or for interruption of service due to electric failure, strikes, walk-outs, war, acts of God, or other causes, beyond the reasonable control of END-POINT WIRELESS. The estimated date work is to be substantially completed is not a definite completion date and time is not of the essence. In the event the work is delayed through no fault of END-POINT WIRELESS, END-POINT WIRELESS shall have such additional time for performance as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
Subscriber assumes all risk of loss of material once delivered to the job site, Subscriber assumes all risk of loss of equipment while under Subscriber’s possession or control.
14. TESTING OF SECURITY SYSTEM: Prior to Subscriber accepting the system as complete, it is the responsibility of END-POINT WIRELESS to test and demonstrate that the Security System is functioning properly, and to correct any apparent defects without cost to Subscriber. After Subscriber accepts the system in writing as complete, it shall be deemed to be in Subscriber’s sole possession and control. Thereafter, Subscriber shall and to notify END-POINT WIRELESS if it is in need of repair. Except for warranty service, service if provided after Subscriber acceptance, is pursuant to paragraph 2.
15. CARE AND SERVICE OF SECURITY SYSTEM: Subscriber agrees not to tamper with, remove or otherwise interfere with the Security System which shall remain in the same location as installed.
All repairs, replacement or alteration to the security system made by reason of alteration to Subscriber's premises, or caused by unauthorized intrusion, lightning or electrical surge, or caused by any means other than normal usage, wear and tear, shall be made at the cost of the Subscriber.
Batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices that are no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer's useful life, are not included in warranty or service under paragraph 2 and will be repaired or replaced at Subscriber’s expense at the following cost schedule of $115 per hour. While this agreement remains in effect, no apparatus or device shall be attached to or connect with the security system as originally installed without END-POINT WIRELESS's written consent.
16. ALTERATION OF PREMISES FOR INSTALLATION: END-POINT WIRELESS is authorized to make preparations such as drilling holes, driving nails, making attachments or doing any other thing necessary in END-POINT WIRELESS's sole discretion for the installation and service of the security system, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any condition created thereby as a result of such installation, service, or removal of the security system, and Subscriber represents that the owner of the premises, if different from Subscriber, has granted full permission to make such alterations.
17. EXCULPATORY CLAUSE: THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO AND
DO NOT AFFECT LIABILITY OF END-POINT WIRELESS FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF ITS INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES. THOSE CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF EXHIBIT “A” HERETO.
END-POINT WIRELESS and Subscriber agree that END-POINT WIRELESS is not an insurer and no insurance coverage is offered herein. The security equipment and END-POINT WIRELESS’s services are designed to reduce certain risks of loss, though END-POINT WIRELESS does not guarantee that no loss will occur. END-POINT WIRELESS is not assuming liability, and, therefore, shall not be liable to Subscriber for any loss, data corruption or inability to retrieve data, personal injury or property damage sustained by Subscriber as a result of intrusion, burglary, theft, hold-up, fire, equipment failure, smoke, or any other cause whatsoever, regardless of whether or not such loss or damage was caused by or contributed to by END-POINT WIRELESS's negligent performance to any degree in furtherance of this agreement, any extra contractual or legal duty, strict products liability, or negligent failure to perform any" obligation pursuant to this agreement or any other legal duty. In the event of any loss or injury to any person or property. Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to Subscriber’s insurer to recover damages. Subscriber releases END-POINT WIRELESS from any claims for contribution, indemnity or subrogation.
18. INSURANCE: In the event of any loss or injury to any person or property related to the Monitoring Services, Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to Subscriber’s insurer to recover damages. Subscriber shall self-insure or obtain insurance to cover any loss the Monitoring Services are intended to detect to one hundred percent of the insurable value, and Subscriber and all those claiming rights under Subscriber waive all rights against END-POINT WIRELESS and its subcontractors for loss or damages caused by burglary, theft, water, smoke, fire or other perils intended to be detected by the Monitoring Services or covered by insurance to be obtained by Subscriber, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of insurance, and not including loss or damages resulting from the willful misconduct of END-POINT WIRELESS or any of its employees, subcontractors, or agents. Insurance requirements covering installation services by END-POINT WIRELESS are set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto.
19. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: Subscriber agrees that should there arise any liability on the part of END-POINT WIRELESS as a result of END-POINT WIRELESS's negligent performance to any degree or negligent failure to perform any of END-POINT WIRELESS’s obligations pursuant to this agreement or any other legal duty, equipment failure, or strict products liability, that END-POINT WIRELESS’s liability shall be limited to the sum of $250 00 or 5% of the sales price or 6 times the aggregate of monthly payments for services being provided at time of loss, whichever is greater. If Subscriber wishes to increase END-POINT WIRELESS's amount of limitation of liability, Subscriber may, as a matter of right, at any time, by entering into a supplemental agreement, obtain a higher limit by paying an annual payment consonant with END-POINT WIRELESS's increased liability. This shall not be construed as insurance coverage. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO AND DO NOT AFFECT LIABILITY OF
END-POINT WIRELESS FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF ITS INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES. THOSE CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF EXHIBIT “A” HERETO.
20. LEGAL ACTION: The parties agree that due to the nature of the services to be provided by ENDPOINT WIRELESS, the monthly or other periodic payments to be made by the Subscriber for the term of this agreement form an integral part of END-POINT WIRELESS's anticipated profits; that in the event of Subscriber's default it would be difficult if not impossible to fix END-POINT WIRELESS's actual damages. Therefore, in the event Subscriber defaults in the payment or any charges to be paid to END-POINT WIRELESS, interest on such overdue payments shall accrue at the rate of ten percent per year. In the event any proper invoice remains unpaid after sixty (60) days, END-POINT WIRELESS shall be permitted to terminate all of its services, including but not limited to terminating monitoring service, under this agreement and to remotely re-program or delete any programming. The prevailing party in any legal action arising out of this agreement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
The parties agree that they may bring claims against the other only in their individual capacity and not as a class action plaintiff or class action member in any purported class or representative proceeding. Service of process or papers in any legal proceeding or arbitration between the parties may be made by certified or registered mail with proof of delivery delivered by the U.S. Postal Service addressed to the party's address in this agreement or another address provided by the party in writing to the party making service. Subscriber submits to the jurisdiction and laws of California and agrees that any litigation or arbitration between the parties must be commenced and maintained in the County of Los Angeles. The parties waive trial by jury in any action between them unless prohibited by law. Any action by Subscriber against END-POINT WIRELESS must be commenced within one year of the accrual of the cause of action or shall be barred.
21. END-POINT'S RIGHT TO SUBCONTRACT SPECIAL SERVICES: Subscriber agrees that ENDPOINT WIRELESS is authorized and permitted to subcontract any services to be provided by ENDPOINT WIRELESS to third parties who may be independent of END-POINT WIRELESS, and, except for a breach of this agreement, END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by Subscriber by reason of fire, theft, burglary or any other cause whatsoever caused by the negligence of third parties, except as provided in Exhibit “A” hereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, END-POINT WIRELESS shall remain primarily liable for the performance of this agreement. Subscriber appoints END-POINT WIRELESS to act as Subscriber’s agent with respect to such third parties, except that END-POINT WIRELESS shall not obligate Subscriber to make any payments to such third parties. Subscriber acknowledges that this agreement, and particularly those paragraphs relating to END-POINT WIRELESS's disclaimer of warranties, exemption from liability, even for its negligence, limitation of liability and indemnification, inure to the benefit of and are applicable to any assignees, subcontractors, manufacturers, vendors and central offices of ENDPOINT WIRELESS.
22. NON-SOLICITATION: Subscriber agrees that it will not solicit for employment for itself, or any other entity, or employ, in any capacity, any employee of END-POINT WIRELESS assigned by ENDPOINT WIRELESS to perform any service for or on behalf of Subscriber for a period of two years after END-POINT WIRELESS has completed providing service to Subscriber. In the event of Subscriber's violation of this provision shall be a material breach of this agreement.,
23. FALSE ALARMS / PERMIT FEES: Subscriber is responsible for all alarm permits and fees, agrees to file for and maintain any permits required by applicable law and indemnify or reimburse END-POINT WIRELESS for any fines relating to permits or false alarms imposed on END-POINT WIRELESS as a result of this agreement. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for permit fees, false alarms, false alarm fines, police or fire response, any damage to personal or real property or personal injury caused by police or fire department response to alarm, whether false alarm or otherwise, or the refusal of the police or fire department to respond. In the event of termination of police or fire response by the municipal police or fire department, this agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and Subscriber shall remain liable for al payments provided for herein. Should END-POINT WIRELESS be required by existing or hereafter enacted law to perform any service or furnish any material not specifically covered by the terms of this agreement, Subscriber and ENDPOINT WIRELESS will use good faith efforts to agree on an adjustment of recurring fees otherwise payable hereunder.
24. CREDIT INVESTIGATION: Subscriber and any guarantor authorize END-POINT WIRELESS to conduct credit investigations from time to time to determine Subscriber’s and guarantor’s credit worthiness.
25. FULL AGREEMENT / SEVERABILITY: This agreement, including Exhibit "A" herto, along with the Schedule of Equipment and Services constitutes the full understanding of the parties and may not be amended, modified or canceled, except in writing signed by both parties. Subscriber acknowledges and represents that Subscriber has not relied on any representation, assertion, guarantee, warranty, collateral agreement or other assurance, except those set forth in this Agreement. Subscriber hereby waives all rights and remedies, at law or in equity, arising, or which may arise, as the result of Subscriber’s reliance on such representation, assertion, guarantee, warranty, collateral agreement or other assurance. To the extent this agreement is inconsistent with any other document, agreement, purchase order or understanding between the parties, the terms of this agreement shall govern. Should any provision of this agreement be deemed void, the remaining parts shall not be affected.
PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Equipment and packaging may contain components containing chemicals known to The State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.
Payment Schedule For Project Grand Total: $59,868.04
Final Payment (Due Upon Completion): $14,967.01
Purchase Order Required:
PO Number(If no. enter "N/A"):
AP Contact Name:
Phone - Direct:
Email:
Title:
SUBSCRIBER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIVING A FULLY EXECUTED COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT AND SCHEDULE OF EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AT TIME OF EXECUTION.
Grissel Chavez
05 / 19 / 2025
EXHIBIT “A”
INSTALLATION TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. The provisions of this Exhibit “A” shall govern the provision of any and all installation services performed by or on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS and shall govern in the event of any conflict or inconsistency with any other provision of this agreement. For purposes of this agreement, “Installation Services” shall mean and include the physical installation, whether by END-POINT WIRELESS or any person or entity acting on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS, on property owned or controlled by Subscriber, including any required configuration and/or programming, of cameras, wires, sensors, and any and all other equipment and related components provided by Verkada, Inc., pursuant to CMAS #3-23-01-1017, or by any third party that is identified in the Schedule of Equipment and Services referenced in Section 1 of this agreement.
2. END-POINT WIRELESS, to the fullest extent permitted by law, agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Subscriber, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) harmless with respect to any and all claims and liabilities, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incidental thereto, which may be suffered or incurred by, accrued against, charged to, or recoverable from any Indemnitee, by reason of any claim or legal action alleging:
(i) bodily injury or death to any person, and/or property damage, arising out of the performance of Installation Services by END-POINT WIRELESS, or any of its employees, subcontractors, or agents; and/or (ii) infringement or misappropriating any United States or foreign patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, or other proprietary right in connection with provision of the Monitoring Services.
In the event that END-POINT WIRELESS is enjoined from providing the Monitoring Services and such injunction is not dissolved within thirty (30) calendar days, or in the event that Subscriber is adjudged, in any final order of a court of competent jurisdiction from which no appeal is taken, to have Infringed upon or misappropriated any patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, or other proprietary right in the access or use of the Services, then END-POINT WIRELESS shall, at its expense: (a) obtain for Subscriber the right to continue using the Monitoring Services; (b) replace or modify the Monitoring Services so that they do not infringe upon or misappropriate such proprietary right and is free to be used by Subscriber; or, (c) in the event that END-POINT WIRELESS is unable or determines, in its reasonable judgment, that it is commercially unreasonable to do either of the aforementioned, END-POINT WIRELESS shall reimburse to Subscriber any prepaid fees.
3. Unless otherwise approved in writing by Subscriber’s risk manager, END-POINT WIRELESS shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this agreement, policies of insurance, of the types and in the minimum amounts as follows, with responsible insurance carriers having an A. M. Best rating of not less than A:VII and duly admitted and qualified in California, covering the Installation Services of END-POINT WIRELESS, pursuant to this agreement: commercial general liability and auto liability ($1,000,000 per occurrence and/or accident, $2,000,000 aggregate); workers’ compensation (statutory limits) and employers’ liability ($500,000 per accident).The Indemnitees shall be named as additional insureds on the CGL and auto liability policies; all policies shall be endorsed to waive the right of subrogation and END-POINT WIRELESS waives all rights of subrogation. Copies of insurance certificates and original endorsements evidencing all required insurance shall be provided to Subscriber prior to commencement of Installation Services.
4. California Labor Code compliance. Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1720(a), the Installation Services Constitute “public works”. Therefore, in the performance of Installation Services, END-POINT WIRELESS shall comply with all Labor Code requirements set forth in Exhibit “A-1” attached hereto.
CMAS #3-23-01-1017
EXHIBIT _A-1
CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE
1 . END-POINT WIRELESS (“Contractor”) acknowledges that the Installation Services required by this contract are subject to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works and the awarding public agency (“City”), and agrees to be bound by all the provisions thereof as though set forth in full herein.
2 . This is a public work and requires the payment of prevailing wages for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract by Contractor or by any subcontractor pursuant to Section 1771 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk or may be obtained at http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm .
Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, not more than $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
3. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, and except for projects involving construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work of $25,000 or less, or maintenance work of $15,000 or less, no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions for bid purposes, only, pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)].
4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1776, Contractor shall maintain and make available an accurate record showing the name of each worker and hours worked each day and each week by each worker employed by Contractor performing services covered by this Agreement.
Contractor and its subcontractors shall furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner in accordance with Labor Code Section 1771.4. The project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor is responsible for compliance with Section 1776 by itself and all of its subcontractors. The Contractor shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation.
5. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. The Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with these Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Before commencing Work on this Project, the Contractor shall provide the City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) Days after concluding Work, Contractor and each of its Subcontractors shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Contract.
6. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the California Labor Code.
7. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, by signing the Agreement to which this Exhibit is attached, Contractor hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract."
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE
Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section, or as may otherwise be permitted or required in writing by the City’s risk manager.
Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office “occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); or (3) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned, or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than 1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. The City of Paramount, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on such policy.
Cyber Liability: Vendor shall maintain comprehensive cyber liability insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss and $2,000,000 general aggregate. If the coverage is maintained on a claims-made basis, the Vendor shall maintain such coverage for an additional three (3) years following termination of the contract.
For Commercial General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability (CGL Coverage): The City will be named as an additional insured, under the commercial general liability (“CGL”) liability insurance policy coverage, for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, and this CGL liability policy protects the additional insured, its officers, agents and employees against liability for personal and bodily injuries, deaths or property damage or destruction arising in any respect, directly or indirectly, in the performance of the contract.
Each such CGL policy shall be endorsed with the following language: The City of Paramount, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, including the insured's general supervision of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased or used by the Named Insured.
This CGL policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverages afforded shall apply as though separate policies had been issued to each insured.
The Additional Insured coverage under the Consultant’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible, or require proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
Waiver of Subrogation. All policies of Commercial General Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Worker’s Compensation shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss.
Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents to the extent of such coverage.
Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant shall deliver redacted copies of the required policies or original certificates of insurance and redacted or specimen endorsements issued by their insurer. The Consultant and its insurer are solely responsible for ensuring that the required insurance complies with this Agreement and provides adequate coverage for all services performed. The Consultant shall procure insurance policies that meet the stated standards.
At least fifteen (15) days before any policy expires, or within a reasonable time after policy renewal, the Consultant shall provide evidence of renewal or replacement coverage. If any policy is canceled or reduced, the Consultant must file evidence of reinstatement or replacement coverage within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the change.
The City may request copies of insurance policies and endorsements for informational purposes only, without assuming any obligation to verify compliance or adequacy.
WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: (ONE OF THE
PARAGRAPHS BELOW MUST BE CHECKED)
□ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent from the California Labor Commission to selfinsure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this Agreement. □ I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Carrier: Gilbert Cohen Insurance Agency, Inc.
Policy Number : A09519629
□ I certify that, in the performance of the work under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and I hereby agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Paramount and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, and losses relating to personal injury or death, economic losses, and property damage arising out of my failure to provide such worker’s compensation insurance. I further agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions.
WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL,
AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY’S FEES.
By: _________________________________ Dated: ______________, 20_____ 2025-08-05
Created by:
Elias Bettencourt
End-Point Wireless
Created for:
Grissel Chavez
City of Paramount
Grissel Chavez
City of Paramount
Security Project
7718 Somerset Blvd Paramount, CA 90723
Dear Grissel,
End-Point Wireless is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this proposal to City of Paramount as requested. The following proposal addresses system requirements as identified in our most recent survey of various sites.
At End-Point Wireless, we are dedicated to providing you with an integrated security solution with high-quality equipment and exemplary service.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Elias Bettencourt Sr.
End-Point Wireless
[email protected]
951-756-6900
Your Custom Security Plan
Village Park 7718 Somerset Blvd - Scope of Work:
End-Point Wireless (EPW) is to replace a camera system consisting of three (3) cameras. The camera locations are as noted on the attached site map. EPW will provide CAT6 cables for all cameras. EPW will provide four (4) switches in IDF cabinet.
End-Point Wireless (EPW) is to replace an access control system consisting of 1 (1) door reader. The location of the readers are as noted in the attached site map.
End-Point Wireless (EPW) is to install a cellular gateway. The location of the gateway is as noted in the attached site map.
Exclusions:
If there are any issues with the use of the existing wiring, EPW will notify the customer and issue a change order accordingly.
Attachments:
• Site Map
• Quote
24/7 Alarm Monitoring Services - Verkada Alarms
Solution Overview
EPW will implement Verkada's cloud-managed alarm system across the City's designated facilities. The service includes 24/7 professional monitoring by Verkada-authorized agents who receive alarm events, verify via live video, notify designated contacts, and dispatch emergency services when necessary.
Monitoring Centers & Certifications
Services are delivered from UL 827-listed, TMA Five-Diamond-certified monitoring centers staffed 24/7/365.
Licensed Monitoring Tiers
Each site holds one Verkada Advanced Alarm license which includes camera-based triggers with live video verification. Alarm triggered from events such as intrusion sensor activation, access control breaches, and camera analytics (e.g., motion/person detection) can all raise alarms.
Response Flows
Three options per site: (1) Notification Only, (2) Standard (call before dispatch), (3) Immediate Dispatch. Live talk-down and siren activation supported with appropriate BZ11 Horn Speaker.
Video Verification & False Alarm Reduction
Advanced licenses allow agents encrypted access to video for real-time verification, minimizing false alarms.
Customer Obligations
City is responsible for correct arming/disarming, maintaining an up-to-date contact list, and managing alarm frequency.
Data Security & Privacy
All video and data are encrypted in transit and at rest. Agent access is limited and logged.
System Health & Support
EPW and City staff can monitor system health via Verkada Command. Hardware includes up to a 10-year warranty.
Service-Level Commitment
Monitoring agents respond to alarms within an average of 30 seconds.
Limitation of Liability
EPW's liability is limited to 60 months of licensing fees. Not responsible for disarmed alarms, misconfigurations, or external outages.
Grand Total $74,835.05
Tax $3,826.95
Total Price $71,008.10
Product List Price Sales
Price Quantity Discount(Percentage) Total Price
Verkada 5-Year CH52 Multisensor Camera License, Capacity Increase $2,699.00 $2,699.00 3.00 20.00% $6,477.60 Verkada 5-Year Horn Speaker License $899.00 $899.00 1.00 20.00% $719.20 Verkada 5-Year AC Door License $999.00 $999.00 1.00 20.00% $799.20 Verkada 5-Year Cellular Gateway License $1,349.00 $1,349.00 3.00 20.00% $3,237.60 Verkada 5-Year Standard Alarm License $7,500.00 $7,500.00 1.00 20.00% $6,000.00 Verkada CH52-E Outdoor Multisensor Camera, 8TB, 365 Days Max $12,699.00 $12,699.00 3.00 20.00% $30,477.60 Verkada - BZ11 Horn Speaker $799.00 $799.00 1.00 20.00% $639.20 Verkada - Pendant Cap Mount $69.00 $69.00 3.00 20.00% $165.60 Verkada ACC-MNT-XLARM-1: Large Arm Mount $159.00 $192.00 3.00 20.00% $460.80 Verkada - Pole Mount $209.00 $209.00 4.00 20.00% $668.80 Verkada PoE++ (802.3bt-2018) Injector, GigE $149.00 $149.00 3.00 20.00% $357.60 Verkada - GC31 indoor gateway $899.00 $899.00 3.00 20.00% $2,157.60 Verkada AC12 One-Door Controller $699.00 $699.00 1.00 20.00% $559.20 Verkada AD34 Multi-format Card Reader $349.00 $349.00 1.00 20.00% $279.20 Verkada 4AH Backup Battery $129.00 $129.00 1.00 20.00% $103.20 TRENDnet 5-Port Gigabit EdgeSmart PoE+ Switch $95.00 $121.00 4.00 0.00% $484.00 GRI 4400-A Industrial Surface Mount Switch Set, 2-1/2" Standard Gap, 10W, 200VDC, 0.50A, Closed Loop, N/O, and 36" Armored Cable, Aluminum- Door Contact
$63.00 $63.00 1.00 0.00% $63.00
Genesis Riser Composite Access Control Cable, Shielded, CL3R, FPLR, CMR, FT4, Sunlight Resistant, 1000' (304.8m), Reel, Yellow Banana $1,114.00 $1,047.00 0.10 0.00% $104.70 ADI - Quiktron Q-Series CAT6 Patch Cable,Booted, 10' (0.9m), Blue $3.00 $8.00 5.00 0.00% $40.00 3/4 in. x 10 ft. Electric Metallic Tube (EMT) Conduit $16.00 $16.00 4.00 0.00% $64.00 Skyjack 32ft Scissor Lift $930.00 $930.00 1.00 $930.00
EMT Miscellaneous $100.00 $50.00 1.00 $50.00
Locksmithing Parts $154.00 $154.00 20.00 $3,080.00
Camera Labor Installation $154.00 $154.00 44.00 $6,776.00 Access Control Labor $154.00 $154.00 41.00 $6,314.00
End-Point Wireless
30141 Antelope Road
Menifee, California 92584
(800) 276-0415
STANDARD COMMERCIAL SECURITY AGREEMENT
Date: 2024-07/14/25
SUBSCRIBER: City of Paramount
AUTHORIZED CONTACT: Grissel Chavez
Contact email: [email protected]
Address: 7718 Somerset Blvd Paramount, CA 90723
1. END-POINT WIRELESS (hereinafter referred to as “End-Point Wireless”) agrees to sell, install and program, at Subscriber's premises, and Subscriber agrees to buy, an electronic security system consisting of the equipment and services described in the attached Schedule of Equipment and Services. As well as any and all services performed by or on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS shall comply with all applicable local, State and federal laws, statutes, regulations and orders.
2. All recurring charges are detailed in the quote section of this document and are to be billed monthly. Subscriber agrees to pay End-Point Wireless via automatic scheduled payments the following sum listed per month for the term of this agreement: $0.00 All recurring charges are detailed in the quote section of this document and billed yearly. Subscriber agrees to pay END-POINT WIRELESS the following sum listed per 5th year for the term of this agreement: $17,233.60
3. TERM OF AGREEMENT: Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, the term of this agreement shall be for a period of 60 month(s) and shall automatically renew month to month thereafter under the same terms and conditions for up to twelve (12) additional one month periods, unless either party gives written notice to the other by certified mail, return receipt requested, of their intention not to renew the agreement at least 30 days prior to the expiration of any term. END-POINT WIRELESS may invoice Subscriber in advance monthly, quarterly, or annually at END-POINT’s option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscriber may terminate this agreement at any time with or without cause or penalty by providing END-POINT WIRELESS not less than sixty (60) days’ prior, written notice. Any prepaid but unearned fees shall be promptly refunded to Subscriber.
4. CENTRAL OFFICE MONITORING SERVICES: (a) Upon receipt of a signal from Subscriber’s alarm system, END-POINT WIRELESS or its designee central office shall make every reasonable effort to notify Subscriber and the appropriate municipal police or fire department depending upon the type of signal received (“Monitoring Services” sometimes herein). Not all signals will require notification to the authorities and subscribers may obtain a written response policy from END-POINT WIRELESS. No response shall be required for supervisory, loss of communication pathway, trouble or low battery signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals transmitted from Subscriber's premises directly to municipal police or fire departments are not monitored by personnel of END-POINT WIRELESS or END-POINT WIRELESS's designee central office and END-POINT WIRELESS does not assume any responsibility for the manner in which such signals are monitored or the response, if any, to such signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals which are transmitted over telephone lines, wire, air waves, internet, VOIP, radio or cellular, or other modes of communication pass through communication networks wholly beyond the control of END-POINT WIRELESS and are not maintained by END-POINT WIRELESS except END-POINT WIRELESS may own the radio network, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any failure which prevents transmission signals from reaching the central office monitoring center or damages arising therefrom, or for data corruption, theft or viruses to Subscriber’s computers if connected to the alarm communication equipment. Subscriber agrees to furnish END-POINT WIRELESS with a written Call List of names and telephone numbers of those persons Subscriber wishes to receive notification of alarm signals.
Unless otherwise provided in the Call List END-POINT WIRELESS will make a reasonable effort to contact the first person reached or notified on the list either via telephone call, text or email message.
All changes and revisions shall be supplied to END-POINT WIRELESS in writing. Subscriber authorizes END-POINT WIRELESS to access the control panel to input or delete data and programming. If the equipment contains video or listening devices permitting central office to monitor video or sound then upon receipt of an alarm signal central office shall monitor video or sound for so long as central office in its sole discretion deems appropriate to confirm an alarm condition. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to remotely activate or deactivate the system, change combinations, openings or closings, or re-program system functions, Subscriber shall pay ENDPOINT WIRELESS $125.00 for each such service. END-POINT WIRELESS may, upon not less than three (3) business days’ prior written notice, prior notice, suspend or terminate its services, in central office’s sole discretion, in event of Subscriber’s default in performance of this agreement or in event central office facility or communication network is nonoperational or the Subscriber’s alarm system transmits more than 10 signals within a 24-hour period without legitimate cause, such transmissions shall be deemed excessive. Central office is authorized to record and maintain audio and video transmissions, data and communications, and shall be the exclusive owner of such property. All Subscriber information and data made accessible to, or stored or handled by END-POINT WIRELESS (“Subscriber Data”),shall be maintained confidentially by END-POINT WIRELESS. (b) Without limiting END-POINT WIRELESS’s obligation of confidentiality as further described herein, END-POINT WIRELESS shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining a data privacy and information security program, including physical, technical, administrative, and organizational safeguards, that comply with or are substantially similar to the security controls identified in the current version of NIST SP800-53, and that is designed to: (a) ensure the security and confidentiality of Subscriber Data; (b) protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of Subscriber Data; (c) protect against unauthorized disclosure, access to, or use of Subscriber Data; (d) ensure the proper disposal of Subscriber Data; and, (e) ensure that all employees, agents, and subcontractors of END-POINT WIRELESS, if any, comply with all of the foregoing. All Subscriber Data, whether in motion, in use, or at rest, shall be encrypted from end to end. In no case shall the safeguards of END-POINT WIRELESS’s data privacy and information security program used to protect Subscriber Data be less stringent than the safeguards used by END-POINT WIRELESS for its own data.
(c) END-POINT WIRELESS is provided a limited license to access Subscriber Data for the sole and exclusive purpose of providing the Services, including a license to collect, process, store, generate, and display Subscriber Data only to the extent necessary in the providing of the Services. ENDPOINT WIRELESS shall: (a) keep and maintain Subscriber Data in strict confidence, using such degree of care as is appropriate and consistent with its obligations as further described in this Agreement and applicable law to avoid unauthorized access, use, disclosure, or loss; (b) use and disclose Subscriber Data solely and exclusively for the purpose of providing the Services in accordance with this Agreement and applicable law; (c) allow access to Subscriber Data only to those employees of END- POINT WIRELESS who are directly involved with and responsible for providing the Services; and, (d) not use, sell, rent, transfer, distribute, or otherwise disclose or make available Subscriber Data for END-POINT WIRELESS’s own purposes or for the benefit of anyone other than Subscriber without Subscriber’s prior written consent. END-POINT WIRELESS may not utilize aggregated data derived from Subscriber Data unless it has been made “anonymous” using technology that irreversibly alters data in such a way that the data subject can no longer be identified directly or indirectly, either by the data controller alone or in collaboration with any other party, and such data is thereby rendered “anonymized data”, as generally described in ISO 25237:2017, Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
5. SERVICE: Service includes all parts and labor, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall service upon Subscriber's request the security system installed in Subscriber's premises between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, within reasonable time after receiving notice from Subscriber that service is required, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. All repairs, replacement or alteration to the security system made by reason of alteration to Subscriber’s premises, or caused by unauthorized intrusion, lightning or electrical surge, or caused by any means other than normal usage, wear and tear, shall be made at the cost of the Subscriber. Batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer's useful life are not included in service and will be repaired or replaced at Subscriber's expense payable at time of service. No apparatus or device shall be attached to or connected with the security system as originally installed without End-Point's written consent. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
6. SUBSCRIBER REMOTE ACCESS: If Remote Access is included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services to be installed and services provided by END-POINT WIRELESS, the equipment will transmit data via Subscriber's high speed Internet, cellular or radio communication service from remote pendant supplied by END-POINT WIRELESS or Subscriber's Internet or wireless connection device which is compatible with END-POINT's remote services. END-POINT WIRELESS will grant access to a server permitting Subscriber to monitor the security system, access the system to arm, disarm and bypass zones on the system, view the remote video camera(s) and control other remote automation devices that may be installed. The remote services server is provided either by ENDPOINT WIRELESS or a third party. END-POINT WIRELESS shall install the camera(s) in a permissible legal location in Subscriber's premises to permit Subscriber viewing. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no responsibility for failure of data transmission, corruption or unauthorized access and shall not monitor or view the camera data. Electronic data may not be encrypted and wireless components of the alarm system may not meet Advanced Encryption Standard specifications for encryption of electronic data established by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for access to the alarm system by others. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
7. WIRELESS AND INTERNET ACCESS CAPABILITIES: Subscriber is responsible for supplying high speed Internet access and or wireless services at Subscriber's premises. END-POINT WIRELESS does not provide Internet service, maintain Internet connection, wireless access or communication pathways, computer, smart phone, electric current connection or supply, or in all cases the remote video server. In consideration of Subscriber making its monthly payments for remote access to the system END-POINT WIRELESS will authorize Subscriber access. END-POINT WIRELESS is not responsible for Subscriber's access to the Internet or any interruption of service or down time of remote access caused by loss of Internet service, radio or cellular or any other mode of communication used by Subscriber to access the system. Subscriber acknowledges that Subscriber's security system can be compromised if the codes or devices used for access are lost or accessed by others and END-POINT WIRELESS.
8. ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATION AND LIMITATIONS: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services, Access Control equipment shall be connected to a computer supplied by the Subscriber and connected to Subscriber’s computer network. If data storage or backup is selected, service END-POINT WIRELESS or its designee shall store and /or backup data received from Subscriber’s system for a period of one year and shall make such data available for download by Subscriber at no cost during such period. Thereafter, all such data shall be permanently deleted. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for data corruption or inability to retrieve data even if caused by END-POINT WIRELESS's negligence.
Subscriber’s data shall be maintained confidential as required in Section 4(c), and shall be retrieved and released only to Subscriber or upon Subscriber's authorization or by legal process. Internet access is not provided by END-POINT WIRELESS and END-POINT WIRELESS has no responsibility for such access or IP address service. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for unauthorized access to the system through the Internet or other communication networks or data corruption or loss for any reason whatsoever. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
9. (a) ACCESS CONTROL ADMINISTRATION: If selected as a service to be provided END-POINT WIRELESS will maintain the data base for the operation of the Access Control System. Subscriber will advise END-POINT WIRELESS of all changes in personnel and or changes access levels of authorization and restrictions, providing Access card serial numbers or biometric data and such information that Subscriber deems necessary to identify personnel. All communication by a subscriber to END-POINT WIRELESS regarding personnel access must be in writing via email or fax to addresses designated by END-POINT WIRELESS. END POINT WIRELESS shall have remote internet access to the Subscriber's designated access control computer to program and make database updates to the system. Subscriber is responsible for maintaining its computer and computer network and Internet access
(b) VIDEO SYSTEM OPERATION AND LIMITATIONS: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services. Video equipment is attached to a digital recorder computer and Subscriber shall not use the computer for any other purpose. Subscriber shall be permitted to access and make changes to the system’s operation on site and over the internet. If data storage is a selected service, END-POINT WIRELESS shall store data received from Subscriber's system for one year. and shall make such data available for download by Subscriber at no cost during such period. Thereafter, all such data shall be permanently deleted. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for data corruption or inability to retrieve data unless caused by END-POINT WIRELESS’s negligence or willful misconduct. Subscriber’s data shall be maintained confidential as required in Section 4(c) and shall be retrieved and released only to Subscriber or upon Subscriber’s authorization or by legal process. Telephone or internet access is not provided by END-POINT WIRELESS and END-POINT WIRELESS has no responsibility for such access or IP address service If system has remote access END-POINT WIRELESS is not responsible for the security or privacy of any wireless network system or router, and it is the Subscriber’s responsibility to secure access to the system with pass codes and lockouts. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for unauthorized access to the system through the internet or other communication networks or data corruption or loss for any reason whatsoever (unless gross negligence or willful misconduct by EPW). All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
10. STREAMING VIDEO DATA / CCTV / EXCESSIVE DATA USAGE: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment, upon receipt of a video signal the video system is designed to activate in the central station and record video data reception, upon which, ENDPOINT WIRELESS or its designee central office, shall make every reasonable effort to notify Subscriber by email, text, or voice message and the appropriate municipal police or fire department.
Subscriber acknowledges that signals transmitted from Subscriber's premises directly to municipal police or fire departments or Subscriber's internal security stations are not monitored by personnel of END-POINT WIRELESS or END-POINT WIRELESS designee central office and END-POINT WIRELESS does not assume any responsibility for the manner in which such signals are monitored or the response, if any, to such signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals which are transmitted through the internet, over telephone lines, wire, air waves, cellular, radio, internet, VOIP, or other modes of communication pass through communication networks wholly beyond the control of ENDPOINT WIRELESS may own the radio network, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any failure which prevents transmission signals from reaching the central office monitoring center or damages arising therefrom, or for data corruption, theft or viruses to Subscriber’s computers if connected to the alarm communication equipment. Subscriber agrees to furnish END-POINT WIRELESS with a written list of names and telephone numbers of those persons Subscriber wishes to receive notification of signals. All changes and revisions shall be supplied to END-POINT WIRELESS in writing. Subscriber authorizes END-POINT WIRELESS to access the supervisory panel to input or delete data and programming. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to remotely activate or deactivate the system, change combinations, openings or closings, or re-program system functions, Subscriber shall pay END-POINT WIRELESS $75.00 for each such service. END-POINT WIRELESS may, upon not less than three (3) business days prior written notice, suspend or terminate its services, in central station’s sole discretion, in event of Subscriber’s default in performance of this agreement or in event central station facility or communication network is nonoperational or Subscriber’s alarm system transmitting more than 10 false alarm signals within a 24-hour period. Central station is authorized to record and maintain audio and video transmissions, data and communications, and shall be the exclusive owner of such property. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for excessive data usage expense incurred by Subscriber attributable to the equipment or services provided herein. All Subscriber information and data shall be maintained confidentially by END-POINT WIRELESS as required in Section 4(c).
11. GUARD RESPONSE: If guard response is specified as a service to be provided, upon receipt of an alarm signal, END-POINT WIRELESS or its subcontractor shall as soon as may be practical send one or more of its guards to the Subscriber's premises. Unless guard determines that the alarm is a false alarm and that no situation requiring police or fire department services exist, the guard shall notify the central station or police or fire department directly that an emergency situation exists and wait up to 15 minutes for the municipal police or fire department personnel or Subscriber to arrive at the premises and if permitted by the police shall assist in making a search of the premises to determine the cause of the alarm condition. If provided with keys to the premises the guard shall endeavor to secure the premises and repair the security equipment. However, Subscriber acknowledges that the guard is not required to enter the premises or to render any service to the security equipment and shall not be required to remain stationed at Subscriber's premises for more than 15 minutes after initial arrival. Subscriber authorizes the guard to take such action the guard deems necessary to secure the premises and reset the alarm, though Subscriber acknowledges that the guard may not be able to or may not have sufficient time to secure the premises or reset the alarm and put same in working order. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to station its guard at the premises for more than 30 minutes, and END-POINT WIRELESS has sufficient personnel to provide such service, and END-POINT WIRELESS makes no such representation that its personnel will be available, then Subscriber agrees to pay END-POINT WIRELESS $65.00 per half hour plus tax for such service. Subscriber agrees to confirm the request to END-POINT WIRELESS to provide extended guard service by email, text or recorded conversation to ENDPOINT WIRELESS at the time request is made and END-POINT WIRELESS is authorized to ignore any request not confirmed within 15 minutes.
12. LIMITED WARRANTY ON SALE: In the event that any part of the security system becomes defective, or in the event that any repairs are required, END-POINT WIRELESS agrees to make all repairs and replacement of parts without costs to the Subscriber for a period of three hundred and sixty five (365) days from the date of installation. END-POINT WIRELESS reserves the option to either replace or repair the alarm equipment, and reserves the right to substitute materials of equal quality at time of replacement, or to use reconditioned parts in fulfillment of this warranty. This warranty does not include batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices that are no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer’s useful life. END-POINT WIRELESS is not the manufacturer of the equipment and other than END-POINT WIRELESS’s limited warranty Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to the manufacturer of the equipment for repairs under its warranty coverage if any. Except as set forth in this agreement, END-POINT WIRELESS makes no express warranties as to any matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the equipment, its merchantability, or its fitness for any particular purpose. END-POINT WIRELESS does not represent nor warrant that the security system may not be compromised or circumvented, or that the system will prevent any loss by burglary, hold-up, or otherwise; or that the system will in all cases provide the protection for which it is installed. END-POINT WIRELESS expressly disclaims any implied warranties, including implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
The warranty does not cover any damage to material or equipment caused by accident, misuse, attempted or unauthorized repair service, modification, or improper installation by anyone other than END-POINT WIRELESS. Except as otherwise provided herein, END POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for consequential damages. Subscriber acknowledges that any affirmation of fact or promise made by END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be deemed to create an express warranty unless included in this agreement in writing; that Subscriber is not relying on END-POINT WIRELESS's skill or judgment in selecting or furnishing a system suitable for any particular purpose and that there are no warranties which extend beyond those on the face of this agreement, and that END-POINT WIRELESS has offered additional and more sophisticated equipment for an additional charge which Subscriber has declined. Except as otherwise provided herein with respect to END-POINT WIRELESS’ installation activities causing bodily injury, death or property damage. Subscriber's exclusive remedy for END-POINT WIRELESS's breach of this agreement or negligence to any degree under this agreement is to require END-POINT WIRELESS to repair or replace, at ENDPOINT WIRELESS’s option, any equipment which is non-operational. This Limited Warranty is independent of and in addition to service contracted under paragraph 2 of this agreement. This Limited Warranty gives Subscriber specific legal rights and Subscriber may also have other rights which vary from state to state. If required by law, END-POINT WIRELESS will procure all permits required by local law and will provide certificate of worker’s compensation prior to starting work. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
13. GENERAL PROVISIONS DELAY IN DELIVERY / INSTALLATION / RISK OF LOSS OF MATERIAL: END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for any damage or loss sustained by Subscriber as a result of delay in delivery and/or installation of equipment, equipment failure, or for interruption of service due to electric failure, strikes, walk-outs, war, acts of God, or other causes, beyond the reasonable control of END-POINT WIRELESS. The estimated date work is to be substantially completed is not a definite completion date and time is not of the essence. In the event the work is delayed through no fault of END-POINT WIRELESS, END-POINT WIRELESS shall have such additional time for performance as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
Subscriber assumes all risk of loss of material once delivered to the job site, Subscriber assumes all risk of loss of equipment while under Subscriber’s possession or control.
14. TESTING OF SECURITY SYSTEM: Prior to Subscriber accepting the system as complete, it is the responsibility of END-POINT WIRELESS to test and demonstrate that the Security System is functioning properly, and to correct any apparent defects without cost to Subscriber. After Subscriber accepts the system in writing as complete, it shall be deemed to be in Subscriber’s sole possession and control. Thereafter, Subscriber shall and to notify END-POINT WIRELESS if it is in need of repair. Except for warranty service, service if provided after Subscriber acceptance, is pursuant to paragraph 2.
15. CARE AND SERVICE OF SECURITY SYSTEM: Subscriber agrees not to tamper with, remove or otherwise interfere with the Security System which shall remain in the same location as installed.
All repairs, replacement or alteration to the security system made by reason of alteration to Subscriber's premises, or caused by unauthorized intrusion, lightning or electrical surge, or caused by any means other than normal usage, wear and tear, shall be made at the cost of the Subscriber.
Batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices that are no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer's useful life, are not included in warranty or service under paragraph 2 and will be repaired or replaced at Subscriber’s expense at the following cost schedule of $115 per hour. While this agreement remains in effect, no apparatus or device shall be attached to or connect with the security system as originally installed without END-POINT WIRELESS's written consent.
16. ALTERATION OF PREMISES FOR INSTALLATION: END-POINT WIRELESS is authorized to make preparations such as drilling holes, driving nails, making attachments or doing any other thing necessary in END-POINT WIRELESS's sole discretion for the installation and service of the security system, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any condition created thereby as a result of such installation, service, or removal of the security system, and Subscriber represents that the owner of the premises, if different from Subscriber, has granted full permission to make such alterations.
17. EXCULPATORY CLAUSE: THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO AND
DO NOT AFFECT LIABILITY OF END-POINT WIRELESS FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF ITS INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES. THOSE CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF EXHIBIT “A” HERETO.
END-POINT WIRELESS and Subscriber agree that END-POINT WIRELESS is not an insurer and no insurance coverage is offered herein. The security equipment and END-POINT WIRELESS’s services are designed to reduce certain risks of loss, though END-POINT WIRELESS does not guarantee that no loss will occur. END-POINT WIRELESS is not assuming liability, and, therefore, shall not be liable to Subscriber for any loss, data corruption or inability to retrieve data, personal injury or property damage sustained by Subscriber as a result of intrusion, burglary, theft, hold-up, fire, equipment failure, smoke, or any other cause whatsoever, regardless of whether or not such loss or damage was caused by or contributed to by END-POINT WIRELESS's negligent performance to any degree in furtherance of this agreement, any extra contractual or legal duty, strict products liability, or negligent failure to perform any" obligation pursuant to this agreement or any other legal duty. In the event of any loss or injury to any person or property. Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to Subscriber’s insurer to recover damages. Subscriber releases END-POINT WIRELESS from any claims for contribution, indemnity or subrogation.
18. INSURANCE: In the event of any loss or injury to any person or property related to the Monitoring Services, Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to Subscriber’s insurer to recover damages. Subscriber shall self-insure or obtain insurance to cover any loss the Monitoring Services are intended to detect to one hundred percent of the insurable value, and Subscriber and all those claiming rights under Subscriber waive all rights against END-POINT WIRELESS and its subcontractors for loss or damages caused by burglary, theft, water, smoke, fire or other perils intended to be detected by the Monitoring Services or covered by insurance to be obtained by Subscriber, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of insurance, and not including loss or damages resulting from the willful misconduct of END-POINT WIRELESS or any of its employees, subcontractors, or agents. Insurance requirements covering installation services by END-POINT WIRELESS are set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto.
19. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: Subscriber agrees that should there arise any liability on the part of END-POINT WIRELESS as a result of END-POINT WIRELESS's negligent performance to any degree or negligent failure to perform any of END-POINT WIRELESS’s obligations pursuant to this agreement or any other legal duty, equipment failure, or strict products liability, that END-POINT WIRELESS’s liability shall be limited to the sum of $250 00 or 5% of the sales price or 6 times the aggregate of monthly payments for services being provided at time of loss, whichever is greater. If Subscriber wishes to increase END-POINT WIRELESS's amount of limitation of liability, Subscriber may, as a matter of right, at any time, by entering into a supplemental agreement, obtain a higher limit by paying an annual payment consonant with END-POINT WIRELESS's increased liability. This shall not be construed as insurance coverage. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO AND DO NOT AFFECT LIABILITY OF
END-POINT WIRELESS FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF ITS INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES. THOSE CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF EXHIBIT “A” HERETO.
20. LEGAL ACTION: The parties agree that due to the nature of the services to be provided by ENDPOINT WIRELESS, the monthly or other periodic payments to be made by the Subscriber for the term of this agreement form an integral part of END-POINT WIRELESS's anticipated profits; that in the event of Subscriber's default it would be difficult if not impossible to fix END-POINT WIRELESS's actual damages. Therefore, in the event Subscriber defaults in the payment or any charges to be paid to END-POINT WIRELESS, interest on such overdue payments shall accrue at the rate of ten percent per year. In the event any proper invoice remains unpaid after sixty (60) days, END-POINT WIRELESS shall be permitted to terminate all of its services, including but not limited to terminating monitoring service, under this agreement and to remotely re-program or delete any programming. The prevailing party in any legal action arising out of this agreement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
The parties agree that they may bring claims against the other only in their individual capacity and not as a class action plaintiff or class action member in any purported class or representative proceeding. Service of process or papers in any legal proceeding or arbitration between the parties may be made by certified or registered mail with proof of delivery delivered by the U.S. Postal Service addressed to the party's address in this agreement or another address provided by the party in writing to the party making service. Subscriber submits to the jurisdiction and laws of California and agrees that any litigation or arbitration between the parties must be commenced and maintained in the County of Los Angeles. The parties waive trial by jury in any action between them unless prohibited by law. Any action by Subscriber against END-POINT WIRELESS must be commenced within one year of the accrual of the cause of action or shall be barred.
21. END-POINT'S RIGHT TO SUBCONTRACT SPECIAL SERVICES: Subscriber agrees that ENDPOINT WIRELESS is authorized and permitted to subcontract any services to be provided by ENDPOINT WIRELESS to third parties who may be independent of END-POINT WIRELESS, and, except for a breach of this agreement, END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by Subscriber by reason of fire, theft, burglary or any other cause whatsoever caused by the negligence of third parties, except as provided in Exhibit “A” hereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, END-POINT WIRELESS shall remain primarily liable for the performance of this agreement. Subscriber appoints END-POINT WIRELESS to act as Subscriber’s agent with respect to such third parties, except that END-POINT WIRELESS shall not obligate Subscriber to make any payments to such third parties. Subscriber acknowledges that this agreement, and particularly those paragraphs relating to END-POINT WIRELESS's disclaimer of warranties, exemption from liability, even for its negligence, limitation of liability and indemnification, inure to the benefit of and are applicable to any assignees, subcontractors, manufacturers, vendors and central offices of ENDPOINT WIRELESS.
22. NON-SOLICITATION: Subscriber agrees that it will not solicit for employment for itself, or any other entity, or employ, in any capacity, any employee of END-POINT WIRELESS assigned by ENDPOINT WIRELESS to perform any service for or on behalf of Subscriber for a period of two years after END-POINT WIRELESS has completed providing service to Subscriber. In the event of Subscriber's violation of this provision shall be a material breach of this agreement.,
23. FALSE ALARMS / PERMIT FEES: Subscriber is responsible for all alarm permits and fees, agrees to file for and maintain any permits required by applicable law and indemnify or reimburse END-POINT WIRELESS for any fines relating to permits or false alarms imposed on END-POINT WIRELESS as a result of this agreement. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for permit fees, false alarms, false alarm fines, police or fire response, any damage to personal or real property or personal injury caused by police or fire department response to alarm, whether false alarm or otherwise, or the refusal of the police or fire department to respond. In the event of termination of police or fire response by the municipal police or fire department, this agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and Subscriber shall remain liable for al payments provided for herein. Should END-POINT WIRELESS be required by existing or hereafter enacted law to perform any service or furnish any material not specifically covered by the terms of this agreement, Subscriber and ENDPOINT WIRELESS will use good faith efforts to agree on an adjustment of recurring fees otherwise payable hereunder.
24. CREDIT INVESTIGATION: Subscriber and any guarantor authorize END-POINT WIRELESS to conduct credit investigations from time to time to determine Subscriber’s and guarantor’s credit worthiness.
25. FULL AGREEMENT / SEVERABILITY: This agreement, including Exhibit "A" herto, along with the Schedule of Equipment and Services constitutes the full understanding of the parties and may not be amended, modified or canceled, except in writing signed by both parties. Subscriber acknowledges and represents that Subscriber has not relied on any representation, assertion, guarantee, warranty, collateral agreement or other assurance, except those set forth in this Agreement. Subscriber hereby waives all rights and remedies, at law or in equity, arising, or which may arise, as the result of Subscriber’s reliance on such representation, assertion, guarantee, warranty, collateral agreement or other assurance. To the extent this agreement is inconsistent with any other document, agreement, purchase order or understanding between the parties, the terms of this agreement shall govern. Should any provision of this agreement be deemed void, the remaining parts shall not be affected.
PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Equipment and packaging may contain components containing chemicals known to The State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.
Payment Schedule For Project Grand Total: $59,868.04
Final Payment (Due Upon Completion): $14,967.01
Purchase Order Required:
PO Number(If no. enter "N/A"):
AP Contact Name:
Phone - Direct:
Email:
Title:
SUBSCRIBER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIVING A FULLY EXECUTED COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT AND SCHEDULE OF EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AT TIME OF EXECUTION.
Grissel Chavez
05 / 19 / 2025
EXHIBIT “A”
INSTALLATION TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. The provisions of this Exhibit “A” shall govern the provision of any and all installation services performed by or on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS and shall govern in the event of any conflict or inconsistency with any other provision of this agreement. For purposes of this agreement, “Installation Services” shall mean and include the physical installation, whether by END-POINT WIRELESS or any person or entity acting on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS, on property owned or controlled by Subscriber, including any required configuration and/or programming, of cameras, wires, sensors, and any and all other equipment and related components provided by Verkada, Inc., pursuant to CMAS #3-23-01-1017, or by any third party that is identified in the Schedule of Equipment and Services referenced in Section 1 of this agreement.
2. END-POINT WIRELESS, to the fullest extent permitted by law, agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Subscriber, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) harmless with respect to any and all claims and liabilities, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incidental thereto, which may be suffered or incurred by, accrued against, charged to, or recoverable from any Indemnitee, by reason of any claim or legal action alleging:
(i) bodily injury or death to any person, and/or property damage, arising out of the performance of Installation Services by END-POINT WIRELESS, or any of its employees, subcontractors, or agents; and/or (ii) infringement or misappropriating any United States or foreign patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, or other proprietary right in connection with provision of the Monitoring Services.
In the event that END-POINT WIRELESS is enjoined from providing the Monitoring Services and such injunction is not dissolved within thirty (30) calendar days, or in the event that Subscriber is adjudged, in any final order of a court of competent jurisdiction from which no appeal is taken, to have Infringed upon or misappropriated any patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, or other proprietary right in the access or use of the Services, then END-POINT WIRELESS shall, at its expense: (a) obtain for Subscriber the right to continue using the Monitoring Services; (b) replace or modify the Monitoring Services so that they do not infringe upon or misappropriate such proprietary right and is free to be used by Subscriber; or, (c) in the event that END-POINT WIRELESS is unable or determines, in its reasonable judgment, that it is commercially unreasonable to do either of the aforementioned, END-POINT WIRELESS shall reimburse to Subscriber any prepaid fees.
3. Unless otherwise approved in writing by Subscriber’s risk manager, END-POINT WIRELESS shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this agreement, policies of insurance, of the types and in the minimum amounts as follows, with responsible insurance carriers having an A. M. Best rating of not less than A:VII and duly admitted and qualified in California, covering the Installation Services of END-POINT WIRELESS, pursuant to this agreement: commercial general liability and auto liability ($1,000,000 per occurrence and/or accident, $2,000,000 aggregate); workers’ compensation (statutory limits) and employers’ liability ($500,000 per accident).The Indemnitees shall be named as additional insureds on the CGL and auto liability policies; all policies shall be endorsed to waive the right of subrogation and END-POINT WIRELESS waives all rights of subrogation. Copies of insurance certificates and original endorsements evidencing all required insurance shall be provided to Subscriber prior to commencement of Installation Services.
4. California Labor Code compliance. Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1720(a), the Installation Services Constitute “public works”. Therefore, in the performance of Installation Services, END-POINT WIRELESS shall comply with all Labor Code requirements set forth in Exhibit “A-1” attached hereto.
CMAS #3-23-01-1017
EXHIBIT _A-1
CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE
1 . END-POINT WIRELESS (“Contractor”) acknowledges that the Installation Services required by this contract are subject to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works and the awarding public agency (“City”), and agrees to be bound by all the provisions thereof as though set forth in full herein.
2 . This is a public work and requires the payment of prevailing wages for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract by Contractor or by any subcontractor pursuant to Section 1771 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk or may be obtained at http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm .
Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, not more than $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
3. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, and except for projects involving construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work of $25,000 or less, or maintenance work of $15,000 or less, no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions for bid purposes, only, pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)].
4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1776, Contractor shall maintain and make available an accurate record showing the name of each worker and hours worked each day and each week by each worker employed by Contractor performing services covered by this Agreement.
Contractor and its subcontractors shall furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner in accordance with Labor Code Section 1771.4. The project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor is responsible for compliance with Section 1776 by itself and all of its subcontractors. The Contractor shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation.
5. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. The Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with these Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Before commencing Work on this Project, the Contractor shall provide the City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) Days after concluding Work, Contractor and each of its Subcontractors shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Contract.
6. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the California Labor Code.
7. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, by signing the Agreement to which this Exhibit is attached, Contractor hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract."
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE
Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section, or as may otherwise be permitted or required in writing by the City’s risk manager.
Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office “occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); or (3) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned, or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than 1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. The City of Paramount, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on such policy.
Cyber Liability: Vendor shall maintain comprehensive cyber liability insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss and $2,000,000 general aggregate. If the coverage is maintained on a claims-made basis, the Vendor shall maintain such coverage for an additional three (3) years following termination of the contract.
For Commercial General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability (CGL Coverage): The City will be named as an additional insured, under the commercial general liability (“CGL”) liability insurance policy coverage, for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, and this CGL liability policy protects the additional insured, its officers, agents and employees against liability for personal and bodily injuries, deaths or property damage or destruction arising in any respect, directly or indirectly, in the performance of the contract.
Each such CGL policy shall be endorsed with the following language: The City of Paramount, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, including the insured's general supervision of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased or used by the Named Insured.
This CGL policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverages afforded shall apply as though separate policies had been issued to each insured.
The Additional Insured coverage under the Consultant’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible, or require proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
Waiver of Subrogation. All policies of Commercial General Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Worker’s Compensation shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss.
Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents to the extent of such coverage.
Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant shall deliver redacted copies of the required policies or original certificates of insurance and redacted or specimen endorsements issued by their insurer. The Consultant and its insurer are solely responsible for ensuring that the required insurance complies with this Agreement and provides adequate coverage for all services performed. The Consultant shall procure insurance policies that meet the stated standards.
At least fifteen (15) days before any policy expires, or within a reasonable time after policy renewal, the Consultant shall provide evidence of renewal or replacement coverage. If any policy is canceled or reduced, the Consultant must file evidence of reinstatement or replacement coverage within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the change.
The City may request copies of insurance policies and endorsements for informational purposes only, without assuming any obligation to verify compliance or adequacy.
WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: (ONE OF THE
PARAGRAPHS BELOW MUST BE CHECKED)
□ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent from the California Labor Commission to selfinsure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this Agreement. □ I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Carrier: Gilbert Cohen Insurance Agency, Inc.
Policy Number : A09519629
□ I certify that, in the performance of the work under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and I hereby agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Paramount and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, and losses relating to personal injury or death, economic losses, and property damage arising out of my failure to provide such worker’s compensation insurance. I further agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions.
WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL,
AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY’S FEES.
By: _________________________________ Dated: ______________, 20_____ 2025-08-05
Created by:
Elias Bettencourt
End-Point Wireless
Created for:
Grissel Chavez
City of Paramount
Grissel Chavez
City of Paramount
16317 Garfield Avenue, Paramount CA
Dear Grissel,
End-Point Wireless is pleased to have the opportunity to provide this proposal to City of Paramount as requested. The following proposal addresses system requirements as identified in our most recent survey of various sites.
At End-Point Wireless, we are dedicated to providing you with an integrated security solution with high-quality equipment and exemplary service.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Elias Bettencourt Sr.
End-Point Wireless
[email protected]
951-756-6900
Your Custom Security Plan
Well Site 16 16317 Garfield Avenue, Paramount CA- Scope of Work:
End-Point Wireless (EPW) is to install a camera system consisting of four (4) cameras. The camera locations are as noted on the attached site map. EPW will provide CAT6 cables for all cameras.
End-Point Wireless (EPW) is to install a horn speaker system consisting of one (1) horn speaker. EPW will provide CAT6 cables for the horn.
EPW is to replace an access control system consisting of one (1) controller and two (2) readers. The locations of the readers are as noted in the attached site map. EPW is to reuse existing 14 AWG cables to all readers. EPW is to install controller and power supply in server room.
Exclusions:
If there are any issues with the use of the existing wiring, EPW will notify the customer and issue a change order accordingly.
If there are any issues with the use of the existing door electrified hardware, EPW will notify the customer and issue a change order accordingly.
Attachments:
• Site Map
• Quote
24/7 Alarm Monitoring Services - Verkada Alarms
Solution Overview
EPW will implement Verkada's cloud-managed alarm system across the City's designated facilities. The service includes 24/7 professional monitoring by Verkada-authorized agents who receive alarm events, verify via live video, notify designated contacts, and dispatch emergency services when necessary.
Monitoring Centers & Certifications
Services are delivered from UL 827-listed, TMA Five-Diamond-certified monitoring centers staffed 24/7/365.
Licensed Monitoring Tiers
Each site holds one Verkada Advanced Alarm license which includes camera-based triggers with live video verification. Alarm triggered from events such as intrusion sensor activation, access control breaches, and camera analytics (e.g., motion/person detection) can all raise alarms.
Response Flows
Three options per site: (1) Notification Only, (2) Standard (call before dispatch), (3) Immediate Dispatch. Live talk-down and siren activation supported with appropriate BZ11 Horn Speaker.
Video Verification & False Alarm Reduction
Advanced licenses allow agents encrypted access to video for real-time verification, minimizing false alarms.
Customer Obligations
City is responsible for correct arming/disarming, maintaining an up-to-date contact list, and managing alarm frequency.
Data Security & Privacy
All video and data are encrypted in transit and at rest. Agent access is limited and logged.
System Health & Support
EPW and City staff can monitor system health via Verkada Command. Hardware includes up to a 10-year warranty.
Service-Level Commitment
Monitoring agents respond to alarms within an average of 30 seconds.
Limitation of Liability
EPW's liability is limited to 60 months of licensing fees. Not responsible for disarmed alarms, misconfigurations, or external outages.
Product List Price Sales
Price Quantity Discount(Percentage) Total Price
Verkada 5-Year AC Door License $999.00 $999.00 2.00 20.00% $1,598.40 Verkada 5-Year Camera License $899.00 $899.00 4.00 20.00% $2,876.80 Verkada 5-Year Cellular Gateway License $1,349.00 $1,349.00 2.00 20.00% $2,158.40 Verkada 5-Year Standard Alarm License $7,500.00 $7,500.00 1.00 20.00% $6,000.00 Verkada 5-Year Horn Speaker License, Capacity Increase $899.00 $899.00 1.00 20.00% $719.20 Verkada 5-Year Cellular Backup License for ACC-CEL-LTE-2 (New Alarms, US only), Capacity Increase $1,349.00 $1,349.00 1.00 20.00% $1,079.20 Verkada CD52-E Outdoor Dome Camera, 2TB, 365 Days Max $3,899.00 $3,899.00 4.00 20.00% $12,476.80 Verkada - GC31-E outdoor gateway $1,299.00 $1,299.00 2.00 20.00% $2,078.40 Verkada BR31 Wireless Door Sensor $99.00 $99.00 10.00 20.00% $792.00 Verkada BR32 Wireless Motion Sensor $99.00 $99.00 3.00 20.00% $237.60 Verkada 4AH Backup Battery $129.00 $129.00 1.00 20.00% $103.20 Cellular Backup Communicator for BP52 Alarm Panel (New Alarms) $349.00 $349.00 1.00 20.00% $279.20 Verkada AC42 4–Door Controller $1,799.00 $1,799.00 1.00 20.00% $1,439.20 BK22 Touchscreen Alarm Keypad (New Alarms) $399.00 $399.00 2.00 20.00% $638.40 Verkada AD33 Multi-format Card Reader $349.00 $349.00 2.00 20.00% $558.40 Verkada - Pole Mount $209.00 $209.00 4.00 20.00% $668.80 Verkada - BZ11 Horn Speaker $799.00 $799.00 1.00 20.00% $639.20 Verkada Arm Mount $99.00 $99.00 4.00 20.00% $316.80
Verkada - Pendant Cap Mount $69.00 $69.00 4.00 20.00% $220.80 Verkada BP52 32-Zone Alarm Panel, North America Type B Plug (New Alarms) $899.00 $899.00 1.00 20.00% $719.20 Backup Battery for BP52 Alarm Panel, 200WH (New Alarms) $199.00 $199.00 1.00 20.00% $159.20 Edwards Signaling Magnetic Contact, Overhead Door, Surface/Floor Mount, 30V/0.25A Max, Max 3" Gap, 18" Armored Leads, SPDT $72.00 $72.00 8.00 0.00% $576.00 Ubiquiti UACC-CABLE-OUTDOOR-PATCH-3M-BK Outdoor Patch Shielded Cable, 3m, Black $8.00 $10.00 5.00 0.00% $50.00
TRENDnet 8-Port Gigabit EdgeSmart PoE+ Switch, 16Gbps $120.00 $127.00 1.00 0.00% $127.00 Altronix Access Power Controller with Power Supply Charger, PTC Class Relay Outputs, 12/24VDC at 4A, FAI, 115VAC, BC400 Enclosure $426.00 $361.00 1.00 $361.00 3/4 in. x 10 ft. Electric Metallic Tube (EMT) Conduit $16.00 $16.00 14.00 0.00% $224.00 ADI PRO CAT6 Riser Cable, 23/4 Solid BC, Unshielded, UTP, CMR/FT4, 1000' (304.8m) Reel in Box, White $198.99 $198.99 0.50 $99.50 Conduit Misc $100.00 $100.00 1.00 $100.00
EMT Miscellaneous $100.00 $200.00 2.00 $400.00
Access Control Labor $154.00 $154.00 33.00 $5,082.00
Camera Labor Installation $154.00 $154.00 44.00 $6,776.00 Conduit Labor $154.00 $154.00 25.00 $3,850.00
Grand Total $64,397.61
Tax $2,368.91
Total Price $62,028.70
Alarm Labor $154.00 $154.00 56.00 $8,624.00
End-Point Wireless
30141 Antelope Road
Menifee, California 92584
(800) 276-0415
STANDARD COMMERCIAL SECURITY AGREEMENT
Date: 2024-07/14/25
SUBSCRIBER: City of Paramount
AUTHORIZED CONTACT: Grissel Chavez
Contact email: [email protected]
Address: 16317 Garfield Avenue, Paramount CA
1. END-POINT WIRELESS (hereinafter referred to as “End-Point Wireless”) agrees to sell, install and program, at Subscriber's premises, and Subscriber agrees to buy, an electronic security system consisting of the equipment and services described in the attached Schedule of Equipment and Services. As well as any and all services performed by or on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS shall comply with all applicable local, State and federal laws, statutes, regulations and orders.
2. All recurring charges are detailed in the quote section of this document and are to be billed monthly. Subscriber agrees to pay End-Point Wireless via automatic scheduled payments the following sum listed per month for the term of this agreement: $0.00 All recurring charges are detailed in the quote section of this document and billed yearly. Subscriber agrees to pay END-POINT WIRELESS the following sum listed per 5th year for the term of this agreement: $14,432.00
3. TERM OF AGREEMENT: Unless sooner terminated as provided herein, the term of this agreement shall be for a period of 60 month(s) and shall automatically renew month to month thereafter under the same terms and conditions for up to twelve (12) additional one month periods, unless either party gives written notice to the other by certified mail, return receipt requested, of their intention not to renew the agreement at least 30 days prior to the expiration of any term. END-POINT WIRELESS may invoice Subscriber in advance monthly, quarterly, or annually at END-POINT’s option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Subscriber may terminate this agreement at any time with or without cause or penalty by providing END-POINT WIRELESS not less than sixty (60) days’ prior, written notice. Any prepaid but unearned fees shall be promptly refunded to Subscriber.
4. CENTRAL OFFICE MONITORING SERVICES: (a) Upon receipt of a signal from Subscriber’s alarm system, END-POINT WIRELESS or its designee central office shall make every reasonable effort to notify Subscriber and the appropriate municipal police or fire department depending upon the type of signal received (“Monitoring Services” sometimes herein). Not all signals will require notification to the authorities and subscribers may obtain a written response policy from END-POINT WIRELESS. No response shall be required for supervisory, loss of communication pathway, trouble or low battery signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals transmitted from Subscriber's premises directly to municipal police or fire departments are not monitored by personnel of END-POINT WIRELESS or END-POINT WIRELESS's designee central office and END-POINT WIRELESS does not assume any responsibility for the manner in which such signals are monitored or the response, if any, to such signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals which are transmitted over telephone lines, wire, air waves, internet, VOIP, radio or cellular, or other modes of communication pass through communication networks wholly beyond the control of END-POINT WIRELESS and are not maintained by END-POINT WIRELESS except END-POINT WIRELESS may own the radio network, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any failure which prevents transmission signals from reaching the central office monitoring center or damages arising therefrom, or for data corruption, theft or viruses to Subscriber’s computers if connected to the alarm communication equipment. Subscriber agrees to furnish END-POINT WIRELESS with a written Call List of names and telephone numbers of those persons Subscriber wishes to receive notification of alarm signals.
Unless otherwise provided in the Call List END-POINT WIRELESS will make a reasonable effort to contact the first person reached or notified on the list either via telephone call, text or email message.
All changes and revisions shall be supplied to END-POINT WIRELESS in writing. Subscriber authorizes END-POINT WIRELESS to access the control panel to input or delete data and programming. If the equipment contains video or listening devices permitting central office to monitor video or sound then upon receipt of an alarm signal central office shall monitor video or sound for so long as central office in its sole discretion deems appropriate to confirm an alarm condition. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to remotely activate or deactivate the system, change combinations, openings or closings, or re-program system functions, Subscriber shall pay ENDPOINT WIRELESS $125.00 for each such service. END-POINT WIRELESS may, upon not less than three (3) business days’ prior written notice, prior notice, suspend or terminate its services, in central office’s sole discretion, in event of Subscriber’s default in performance of this agreement or in event central office facility or communication network is nonoperational or the Subscriber’s alarm system transmits more than 10 signals within a 24-hour period without legitimate cause, such transmissions shall be deemed excessive. Central office is authorized to record and maintain audio and video transmissions, data and communications, and shall be the exclusive owner of such property. All Subscriber information and data made accessible to, or stored or handled by END-POINT WIRELESS (“Subscriber Data”),shall be maintained confidentially by END-POINT WIRELESS. (b) Without limiting END-POINT WIRELESS’s obligation of confidentiality as further described herein, END-POINT WIRELESS shall be responsible for establishing and maintaining a data privacy and information security program, including physical, technical, administrative, and organizational safeguards, that comply with or are substantially similar to the security controls identified in the current version of NIST SP800-53, and that is designed to: (a) ensure the security and confidentiality of Subscriber Data; (b) protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of Subscriber Data; (c) protect against unauthorized disclosure, access to, or use of Subscriber Data; (d) ensure the proper disposal of Subscriber Data; and, (e) ensure that all employees, agents, and subcontractors of END-POINT WIRELESS, if any, comply with all of the foregoing. All Subscriber Data, whether in motion, in use, or at rest, shall be encrypted from end to end. In no case shall the safeguards of END-POINT WIRELESS’s data privacy and information security program used to protect Subscriber Data be less stringent than the safeguards used by END-POINT WIRELESS for its own data.
(c) END-POINT WIRELESS is provided a limited license to access Subscriber Data for the sole and exclusive purpose of providing the Services, including a license to collect, process, store, generate, and display Subscriber Data only to the extent necessary in the providing of the Services. ENDPOINT WIRELESS shall: (a) keep and maintain Subscriber Data in strict confidence, using such degree of care as is appropriate and consistent with its obligations as further described in this Agreement and applicable law to avoid unauthorized access, use, disclosure, or loss; (b) use and disclose Subscriber Data solely and exclusively for the purpose of providing the Services in accordance with this Agreement and applicable law; (c) allow access to Subscriber Data only to those employees of END- POINT WIRELESS who are directly involved with and responsible for providing the Services; and, (d) not use, sell, rent, transfer, distribute, or otherwise disclose or make available Subscriber Data for END-POINT WIRELESS’s own purposes or for the benefit of anyone other than Subscriber without Subscriber’s prior written consent. END-POINT WIRELESS may not utilize aggregated data derived from Subscriber Data unless it has been made “anonymous” using technology that irreversibly alters data in such a way that the data subject can no longer be identified directly or indirectly, either by the data controller alone or in collaboration with any other party, and such data is thereby rendered “anonymized data”, as generally described in ISO 25237:2017, Sections 3.2 and 3.3.
5. SERVICE: Service includes all parts and labor, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall service upon Subscriber's request the security system installed in Subscriber's premises between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, within reasonable time after receiving notice from Subscriber that service is required, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays. All repairs, replacement or alteration to the security system made by reason of alteration to Subscriber’s premises, or caused by unauthorized intrusion, lightning or electrical surge, or caused by any means other than normal usage, wear and tear, shall be made at the cost of the Subscriber. Batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer's useful life are not included in service and will be repaired or replaced at Subscriber's expense payable at time of service. No apparatus or device shall be attached to or connected with the security system as originally installed without End-Point's written consent. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
6. SUBSCRIBER REMOTE ACCESS: If Remote Access is included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services to be installed and services provided by END-POINT WIRELESS, the equipment will transmit data via Subscriber's high speed Internet, cellular or radio communication service from remote pendant supplied by END-POINT WIRELESS or Subscriber's Internet or wireless connection device which is compatible with END-POINT's remote services. END-POINT WIRELESS will grant access to a server permitting Subscriber to monitor the security system, access the system to arm, disarm and bypass zones on the system, view the remote video camera(s) and control other remote automation devices that may be installed. The remote services server is provided either by ENDPOINT WIRELESS or a third party. END-POINT WIRELESS shall install the camera(s) in a permissible legal location in Subscriber's premises to permit Subscriber viewing. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no responsibility for failure of data transmission, corruption or unauthorized access and shall not monitor or view the camera data. Electronic data may not be encrypted and wireless components of the alarm system may not meet Advanced Encryption Standard specifications for encryption of electronic data established by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology and END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for access to the alarm system by others. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
7. WIRELESS AND INTERNET ACCESS CAPABILITIES: Subscriber is responsible for supplying high speed Internet access and or wireless services at Subscriber's premises. END-POINT WIRELESS does not provide Internet service, maintain Internet connection, wireless access or communication pathways, computer, smart phone, electric current connection or supply, or in all cases the remote video server. In consideration of Subscriber making its monthly payments for remote access to the system END-POINT WIRELESS will authorize Subscriber access. END-POINT WIRELESS is not responsible for Subscriber's access to the Internet or any interruption of service or down time of remote access caused by loss of Internet service, radio or cellular or any other mode of communication used by Subscriber to access the system. Subscriber acknowledges that Subscriber's security system can be compromised if the codes or devices used for access are lost or accessed by others and END-POINT WIRELESS.
8. ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATION AND LIMITATIONS: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services, Access Control equipment shall be connected to a computer supplied by the Subscriber and connected to Subscriber’s computer network. If data storage or backup is selected, service END-POINT WIRELESS or its designee shall store and /or backup data received from Subscriber’s system for a period of one year and shall make such data available for download by Subscriber at no cost during such period. Thereafter, all such data shall be permanently deleted. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for data corruption or inability to retrieve data even if caused by END-POINT WIRELESS's negligence.
Subscriber’s data shall be maintained confidential as required in Section 4(c), and shall be retrieved and released only to Subscriber or upon Subscriber's authorization or by legal process. Internet access is not provided by END-POINT WIRELESS and END-POINT WIRELESS has no responsibility for such access or IP address service. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for unauthorized access to the system through the Internet or other communication networks or data corruption or loss for any reason whatsoever. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
9. (a) ACCESS CONTROL ADMINISTRATION: If selected as a service to be provided END-POINT WIRELESS will maintain the data base for the operation of the Access Control System. Subscriber will advise END-POINT WIRELESS of all changes in personnel and or changes access levels of authorization and restrictions, providing Access card serial numbers or biometric data and such information that Subscriber deems necessary to identify personnel. All communication by a subscriber to END-POINT WIRELESS regarding personnel access must be in writing via email or fax to addresses designated by END-POINT WIRELESS. END POINT WIRELESS shall have remote internet access to the Subscriber's designated access control computer to program and make database updates to the system. Subscriber is responsible for maintaining its computer and computer network and Internet access
(b) VIDEO SYSTEM OPERATION AND LIMITATIONS: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment and Services. Video equipment is attached to a digital recorder computer and Subscriber shall not use the computer for any other purpose. Subscriber shall be permitted to access and make changes to the system’s operation on site and over the internet. If data storage is a selected service, END-POINT WIRELESS shall store data received from Subscriber's system for one year. and shall make such data available for download by Subscriber at no cost during such period. Thereafter, all such data shall be permanently deleted. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for data corruption or inability to retrieve data unless caused by END-POINT WIRELESS’s negligence or willful misconduct. Subscriber’s data shall be maintained confidential as required in Section 4(c) and shall be retrieved and released only to Subscriber or upon Subscriber’s authorization or by legal process. Telephone or internet access is not provided by END-POINT WIRELESS and END-POINT WIRELESS has no responsibility for such access or IP address service If system has remote access END-POINT WIRELESS is not responsible for the security or privacy of any wireless network system or router, and it is the Subscriber’s responsibility to secure access to the system with pass codes and lockouts. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for unauthorized access to the system through the internet or other communication networks or data corruption or loss for any reason whatsoever (unless gross negligence or willful misconduct by EPW). All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
10. STREAMING VIDEO DATA / CCTV / EXCESSIVE DATA USAGE: If selected as a service to be provided and included in the Schedule of Equipment, upon receipt of a video signal the video system is designed to activate in the central station and record video data reception, upon which, ENDPOINT WIRELESS or its designee central office, shall make every reasonable effort to notify Subscriber by email, text, or voice message and the appropriate municipal police or fire department.
Subscriber acknowledges that signals transmitted from Subscriber's premises directly to municipal police or fire departments or Subscriber's internal security stations are not monitored by personnel of END-POINT WIRELESS or END-POINT WIRELESS designee central office and END-POINT WIRELESS does not assume any responsibility for the manner in which such signals are monitored or the response, if any, to such signals. Subscriber acknowledges that signals which are transmitted through the internet, over telephone lines, wire, air waves, cellular, radio, internet, VOIP, or other modes of communication pass through communication networks wholly beyond the control of ENDPOINT WIRELESS may own the radio network, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any failure which prevents transmission signals from reaching the central office monitoring center or damages arising therefrom, or for data corruption, theft or viruses to Subscriber’s computers if connected to the alarm communication equipment. Subscriber agrees to furnish END-POINT WIRELESS with a written list of names and telephone numbers of those persons Subscriber wishes to receive notification of signals. All changes and revisions shall be supplied to END-POINT WIRELESS in writing. Subscriber authorizes END-POINT WIRELESS to access the supervisory panel to input or delete data and programming. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to remotely activate or deactivate the system, change combinations, openings or closings, or re-program system functions, Subscriber shall pay END-POINT WIRELESS $75.00 for each such service. END-POINT WIRELESS may, upon not less than three (3) business days prior written notice, suspend or terminate its services, in central station’s sole discretion, in event of Subscriber’s default in performance of this agreement or in event central station facility or communication network is nonoperational or Subscriber’s alarm system transmitting more than 10 false alarm signals within a 24-hour period. Central station is authorized to record and maintain audio and video transmissions, data and communications, and shall be the exclusive owner of such property. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for excessive data usage expense incurred by Subscriber attributable to the equipment or services provided herein. All Subscriber information and data shall be maintained confidentially by END-POINT WIRELESS as required in Section 4(c).
11. GUARD RESPONSE: If guard response is specified as a service to be provided, upon receipt of an alarm signal, END-POINT WIRELESS or its subcontractor shall as soon as may be practical send one or more of its guards to the Subscriber's premises. Unless guard determines that the alarm is a false alarm and that no situation requiring police or fire department services exist, the guard shall notify the central station or police or fire department directly that an emergency situation exists and wait up to 15 minutes for the municipal police or fire department personnel or Subscriber to arrive at the premises and if permitted by the police shall assist in making a search of the premises to determine the cause of the alarm condition. If provided with keys to the premises the guard shall endeavor to secure the premises and repair the security equipment. However, Subscriber acknowledges that the guard is not required to enter the premises or to render any service to the security equipment and shall not be required to remain stationed at Subscriber's premises for more than 15 minutes after initial arrival. Subscriber authorizes the guard to take such action the guard deems necessary to secure the premises and reset the alarm, though Subscriber acknowledges that the guard may not be able to or may not have sufficient time to secure the premises or reset the alarm and put same in working order. If Subscriber requests END-POINT WIRELESS to station its guard at the premises for more than 30 minutes, and END-POINT WIRELESS has sufficient personnel to provide such service, and END-POINT WIRELESS makes no such representation that its personnel will be available, then Subscriber agrees to pay END-POINT WIRELESS $65.00 per half hour plus tax for such service. Subscriber agrees to confirm the request to END-POINT WIRELESS to provide extended guard service by email, text or recorded conversation to ENDPOINT WIRELESS at the time request is made and END-POINT WIRELESS is authorized to ignore any request not confirmed within 15 minutes.
12. LIMITED WARRANTY ON SALE: In the event that any part of the security system becomes defective, or in the event that any repairs are required, END-POINT WIRELESS agrees to make all repairs and replacement of parts without costs to the Subscriber for a period of three hundred and sixty five (365) days from the date of installation. END-POINT WIRELESS reserves the option to either replace or repair the alarm equipment, and reserves the right to substitute materials of equal quality at time of replacement, or to use reconditioned parts in fulfillment of this warranty. This warranty does not include batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices that are no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer’s useful life. END-POINT WIRELESS is not the manufacturer of the equipment and other than END-POINT WIRELESS’s limited warranty Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to the manufacturer of the equipment for repairs under its warranty coverage if any. Except as set forth in this agreement, END-POINT WIRELESS makes no express warranties as to any matter whatsoever, including, without limitation, the condition of the equipment, its merchantability, or its fitness for any particular purpose. END-POINT WIRELESS does not represent nor warrant that the security system may not be compromised or circumvented, or that the system will prevent any loss by burglary, hold-up, or otherwise; or that the system will in all cases provide the protection for which it is installed. END-POINT WIRELESS expressly disclaims any implied warranties, including implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
The warranty does not cover any damage to material or equipment caused by accident, misuse, attempted or unauthorized repair service, modification, or improper installation by anyone other than END-POINT WIRELESS. Except as otherwise provided herein, END POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for consequential damages. Subscriber acknowledges that any affirmation of fact or promise made by END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be deemed to create an express warranty unless included in this agreement in writing; that Subscriber is not relying on END-POINT WIRELESS's skill or judgment in selecting or furnishing a system suitable for any particular purpose and that there are no warranties which extend beyond those on the face of this agreement, and that END-POINT WIRELESS has offered additional and more sophisticated equipment for an additional charge which Subscriber has declined. Except as otherwise provided herein with respect to END-POINT WIRELESS’ installation activities causing bodily injury, death or property damage. Subscriber's exclusive remedy for END-POINT WIRELESS's breach of this agreement or negligence to any degree under this agreement is to require END-POINT WIRELESS to repair or replace, at ENDPOINT WIRELESS’s option, any equipment which is non-operational. This Limited Warranty is independent of and in addition to service contracted under paragraph 2 of this agreement. This Limited Warranty gives Subscriber specific legal rights and Subscriber may also have other rights which vary from state to state. If required by law, END-POINT WIRELESS will procure all permits required by local law and will provide certificate of worker’s compensation prior to starting work. All END-POINT WIRELESS installation services are governed by the provisions of Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
13. GENERAL PROVISIONS DELAY IN DELIVERY / INSTALLATION / RISK OF LOSS OF MATERIAL: END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for any damage or loss sustained by Subscriber as a result of delay in delivery and/or installation of equipment, equipment failure, or for interruption of service due to electric failure, strikes, walk-outs, war, acts of God, or other causes, beyond the reasonable control of END-POINT WIRELESS. The estimated date work is to be substantially completed is not a definite completion date and time is not of the essence. In the event the work is delayed through no fault of END-POINT WIRELESS, END-POINT WIRELESS shall have such additional time for performance as may be reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
Subscriber assumes all risk of loss of material once delivered to the job site, Subscriber assumes all risk of loss of equipment while under Subscriber’s possession or control.
14. TESTING OF SECURITY SYSTEM: Prior to Subscriber accepting the system as complete, it is the responsibility of END-POINT WIRELESS to test and demonstrate that the Security System is functioning properly, and to correct any apparent defects without cost to Subscriber. After Subscriber accepts the system in writing as complete, it shall be deemed to be in Subscriber’s sole possession and control. Thereafter, Subscriber shall and to notify END-POINT WIRELESS if it is in need of repair. Except for warranty service, service if provided after Subscriber acceptance, is pursuant to paragraph 2.
15. CARE AND SERVICE OF SECURITY SYSTEM: Subscriber agrees not to tamper with, remove or otherwise interfere with the Security System which shall remain in the same location as installed.
All repairs, replacement or alteration to the security system made by reason of alteration to Subscriber's premises, or caused by unauthorized intrusion, lightning or electrical surge, or caused by any means other than normal usage, wear and tear, shall be made at the cost of the Subscriber.
Batteries, electrical surges, lightning damage, software upgrades and repairs, communication devices that are no longer supported by communication pathways, obsolete components and components exceeding manufacturer's useful life, are not included in warranty or service under paragraph 2 and will be repaired or replaced at Subscriber’s expense at the following cost schedule of $115 per hour. While this agreement remains in effect, no apparatus or device shall be attached to or connect with the security system as originally installed without END-POINT WIRELESS's written consent.
16. ALTERATION OF PREMISES FOR INSTALLATION: END-POINT WIRELESS is authorized to make preparations such as drilling holes, driving nails, making attachments or doing any other thing necessary in END-POINT WIRELESS's sole discretion for the installation and service of the security system, and END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be responsible for any condition created thereby as a result of such installation, service, or removal of the security system, and Subscriber represents that the owner of the premises, if different from Subscriber, has granted full permission to make such alterations.
17. EXCULPATORY CLAUSE: THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO AND
DO NOT AFFECT LIABILITY OF END-POINT WIRELESS FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF ITS INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES. THOSE CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF EXHIBIT “A” HERETO.
END-POINT WIRELESS and Subscriber agree that END-POINT WIRELESS is not an insurer and no insurance coverage is offered herein. The security equipment and END-POINT WIRELESS’s services are designed to reduce certain risks of loss, though END-POINT WIRELESS does not guarantee that no loss will occur. END-POINT WIRELESS is not assuming liability, and, therefore, shall not be liable to Subscriber for any loss, data corruption or inability to retrieve data, personal injury or property damage sustained by Subscriber as a result of intrusion, burglary, theft, hold-up, fire, equipment failure, smoke, or any other cause whatsoever, regardless of whether or not such loss or damage was caused by or contributed to by END-POINT WIRELESS's negligent performance to any degree in furtherance of this agreement, any extra contractual or legal duty, strict products liability, or negligent failure to perform any" obligation pursuant to this agreement or any other legal duty. In the event of any loss or injury to any person or property. Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to Subscriber’s insurer to recover damages. Subscriber releases END-POINT WIRELESS from any claims for contribution, indemnity or subrogation.
18. INSURANCE: In the event of any loss or injury to any person or property related to the Monitoring Services, Subscriber agrees to look exclusively to Subscriber’s insurer to recover damages. Subscriber shall self-insure or obtain insurance to cover any loss the Monitoring Services are intended to detect to one hundred percent of the insurable value, and Subscriber and all those claiming rights under Subscriber waive all rights against END-POINT WIRELESS and its subcontractors for loss or damages caused by burglary, theft, water, smoke, fire or other perils intended to be detected by the Monitoring Services or covered by insurance to be obtained by Subscriber, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of insurance, and not including loss or damages resulting from the willful misconduct of END-POINT WIRELESS or any of its employees, subcontractors, or agents. Insurance requirements covering installation services by END-POINT WIRELESS are set forth in Exhibit “A” hereto.
19. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: Subscriber agrees that should there arise any liability on the part of END-POINT WIRELESS as a result of END-POINT WIRELESS's negligent performance to any degree or negligent failure to perform any of END-POINT WIRELESS’s obligations pursuant to this agreement or any other legal duty, equipment failure, or strict products liability, that END-POINT WIRELESS’s liability shall be limited to the sum of $250. 00 or 5% of the sales price or 6 times the aggregate of monthly payments for services being provided at time of loss, whichever is greater. If Subscriber wishes to increase END-POINT WIRELESS's amount of limitation of liability, Subscriber may, as a matter of right, at any time, by entering into a supplemental agreement, obtain a higher limit by paying an annual payment consonant with END-POINT WIRELESS's increased liability. This shall not be construed as insurance coverage. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION DO NOT APPLY TO AND DO NOT AFFECT LIABILITY OF
END-POINT WIRELESS FOR CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF ITS INSTALLATION ACTIVITIES. THOSE CLAIMS AND LIABILITIES ARE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF EXHIBIT “A” HERETO.
20. LEGAL ACTION: The parties agree that due to the nature of the services to be provided by ENDPOINT WIRELESS, the monthly or other periodic payments to be made by the Subscriber for the term of this agreement form an integral part of END-POINT WIRELESS's anticipated profits; that in the event of Subscriber's default it would be difficult if not impossible to fix END-POINT WIRELESS's actual damages. Therefore, in the event Subscriber defaults in the payment or any charges to be paid to END-POINT WIRELESS, interest on such overdue payments shall accrue at the rate of ten percent per year. In the event any proper invoice remains unpaid after sixty (60) days, END-POINT WIRELESS shall be permitted to terminate all of its services, including but not limited to terminating monitoring service, under this agreement and to remotely re-program or delete any programming. The prevailing party in any legal action arising out of this agreement shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
The parties agree that they may bring claims against the other only in their individual capacity and not as a class action plaintiff or class action member in any purported class or representative proceeding. Service of process or papers in any legal proceeding or arbitration between the parties may be made by certified or registered mail with proof of delivery delivered by the U.S. Postal Service addressed to the party's address in this agreement or another address provided by the party in writing to the party making service. Subscriber submits to the jurisdiction and laws of California and agrees that any litigation or arbitration between the parties must be commenced and maintained in the County of Los Angeles. The parties waive trial by jury in any action between them unless prohibited by law. Any action by Subscriber against END-POINT WIRELESS must be commenced within one year of the accrual of the cause of action or shall be barred.
21. END-POINT'S RIGHT TO SUBCONTRACT SPECIAL SERVICES: Subscriber agrees that ENDPOINT WIRELESS is authorized and permitted to subcontract any services to be provided by ENDPOINT WIRELESS to third parties who may be independent of END-POINT WIRELESS, and, except for a breach of this agreement, END-POINT WIRELESS shall not be liable for any loss or damage sustained by Subscriber by reason of fire, theft, burglary or any other cause whatsoever caused by the negligence of third parties, except as provided in Exhibit “A” hereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, END-POINT WIRELESS shall remain primarily liable for the performance of this agreement. Subscriber appoints END-POINT WIRELESS to act as Subscriber’s agent with respect to such third parties, except that END-POINT WIRELESS shall not obligate Subscriber to make any payments to such third parties. Subscriber acknowledges that this agreement, and particularly those paragraphs relating to END-POINT WIRELESS's disclaimer of warranties, exemption from liability, even for its negligence, limitation of liability and indemnification, inure to the benefit of and are applicable to any assignees, subcontractors, manufacturers, vendors and central offices of ENDPOINT WIRELESS.
22. NON-SOLICITATION: Subscriber agrees that it will not solicit for employment for itself, or any other entity, or employ, in any capacity, any employee of END-POINT WIRELESS assigned by ENDPOINT WIRELESS to perform any service for or on behalf of Subscriber for a period of two years after END-POINT WIRELESS has completed providing service to Subscriber. In the event of Subscriber's violation of this provision shall be a material breach of this agreement.,
23. FALSE ALARMS / PERMIT FEES: Subscriber is responsible for all alarm permits and fees, agrees to file for and maintain any permits required by applicable law and indemnify or reimburse END-POINT WIRELESS for any fines relating to permits or false alarms imposed on END-POINT WIRELESS as a result of this agreement. END-POINT WIRELESS shall have no liability for permit fees, false alarms, false alarm fines, police or fire response, any damage to personal or real property or personal injury caused by police or fire department response to alarm, whether false alarm or otherwise, or the refusal of the police or fire department to respond. In the event of termination of police or fire response by the municipal police or fire department, this agreement shall nevertheless remain in full force and Subscriber shall remain liable for al payments provided for herein. Should END-POINT WIRELESS be required by existing or hereafter enacted law to perform any service or furnish any material not specifically covered by the terms of this agreement, Subscriber and ENDPOINT WIRELESS will use good faith efforts to agree on an adjustment of recurring fees otherwise payable hereunder.
24. CREDIT INVESTIGATION: Subscriber and any guarantor authorize END-POINT WIRELESS to conduct credit investigations from time to time to determine Subscriber’s and guarantor’s credit worthiness.
25. FULL AGREEMENT / SEVERABILITY: This agreement, including Exhibit "A" herto, along with the Schedule of Equipment and Services constitutes the full understanding of the parties and may not be amended, modified or canceled, except in writing signed by both parties. Subscriber acknowledges and represents that Subscriber has not relied on any representation, assertion, guarantee, warranty, collateral agreement or other assurance, except those set forth in this Agreement. Subscriber hereby waives all rights and remedies, at law or in equity, arising, or which may arise, as the result of Subscriber’s reliance on such representation, assertion, guarantee, warranty, collateral agreement or other assurance. To the extent this agreement is inconsistent with any other document, agreement, purchase order or understanding between the parties, the terms of this agreement shall govern. Should any provision of this agreement be deemed void, the remaining parts shall not be affected.
PROPOSITION 65 WARNING: Equipment and packaging may contain components containing chemicals known to The State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm.
Payment Schedule For Project Grand Total:
Deposit (Due On Day of Signing): $45,008.67
Final Payment (Due Upon Completion): $19,388.93
Purchase Order Required:
PO Number(If no. enter "N/A"):
AP Contact Name:
Phone - Direct:
Email:
Title:
SUBSCRIBER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIVING A FULLY EXECUTED COPY OF THIS AGREEMENT AND SCHEDULE OF EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AT TIME OF EXECUTION.
Grissel Chavez
08 / 05 / 2025
EXHIBIT “A”
INSTALLATION TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. The provisions of this Exhibit “A” shall govern the provision of any and all installation services performed by or on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS and shall govern in the event of any conflict or inconsistency with any other provision of this agreement. For purposes of this agreement, “Installation Services” shall mean and include the physical installation, whether by END-POINT WIRELESS or any person or entity acting on behalf of END-POINT WIRELESS, on property owned or controlled by Subscriber, including any required configuration and/or programming, of cameras, wires, sensors, and any and all other equipment and related components provided by Verkada, Inc., pursuant to CMAS #3-23-01-1017, or by any third party that is identified in the Schedule of Equipment and Services referenced in Section 1 of this agreement.
2. END-POINT WIRELESS, to the fullest extent permitted by law, agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Subscriber, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) harmless with respect to any and all claims and liabilities, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incidental thereto, which may be suffered or incurred by, accrued against, charged to, or recoverable from any Indemnitee, by reason of any claim or legal action alleging:
(i) bodily injury or death to any person, and/or property damage, arising out of the performance of Installation Services by END-POINT WIRELESS, or any of its employees, subcontractors, or agents; and/or (ii) infringement or misappropriating any United States or foreign patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, or other proprietary right in connection with provision of the Monitoring Services.
In the event that END-POINT WIRELESS is enjoined from providing the Monitoring Services and such injunction is not dissolved within thirty (30) calendar days, or in the event that Subscriber is adjudged, in any final order of a court of competent jurisdiction from which no appeal is taken, to have Infringed upon or misappropriated any patent, copyright, trade secret, trademark, or other proprietary right in the access or use of the Services, then END-POINT WIRELESS shall, at its expense: (a) obtain for Subscriber the right to continue using the Monitoring Services; (b) replace or modify the Monitoring Services so that they do not infringe upon or misappropriate such proprietary right and is free to be used by Subscriber; or, (c) in the event that END-POINT WIRELESS is unable or determines, in its reasonable judgment, that it is commercially unreasonable to do either of the aforementioned, END-POINT WIRELESS shall reimburse to Subscriber any prepaid fees.
3. Unless otherwise approved in writing by Subscriber’s risk manager, END-POINT WIRELESS shall, at its own expense, procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this agreement, policies of insurance, of the types and in the minimum amounts as follows, with responsible insurance carriers having an A. M. Best rating of not less than A:VII and duly admitted and qualified in California, covering the Installation Services of END-POINT WIRELESS, pursuant to this agreement: commercial general liability and auto liability ($1,000,000 per occurrence and/or accident, $2,000,000 aggregate); workers’ compensation (statutory limits) and employers’ liability ($500,000 per accident).The Indemnitees shall be named as additional insureds on the CGL and auto liability policies; all policies shall be endorsed to waive the right of subrogation and END-POINT WIRELESS waives all rights of subrogation. Copies of insurance certificates and original endorsements evidencing all required insurance shall be provided to Subscriber prior to commencement of Installation Services.
4. California Labor Code compliance. Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1720(a), the Installation Services Constitute “public works”. Therefore, in the performance of Installation Services, END-POINT WIRELESS shall comply with all Labor Code requirements set forth in Exhibit “A-1” attached hereto.
EXHIBIT _A-1
CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE COMPLIANCE
1 . END-POINT WIRELESS (“Contractor”) acknowledges that the Installation Services required by this contract are subject to the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1 (commencing with Section 1720) of the California Labor Code relating to public works and the awarding public agency (“City”), and agrees to be bound by all the provisions thereof as though set forth in full herein.
2 . This is a public work and requires the payment of prevailing wages for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract by Contractor or by any subcontractor pursuant to Section 1771 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk or may be obtained at http://www.dir.ca.gov/OPRL/DPreWageDetermination.htm .
Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, not more than $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
3. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, and except for projects involving construction, alteration, demolition, installation, or repair work of $25,000 or less, or maintenance work of $15,000 or less, no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Section 1725.5 [with limited exceptions for bid purposes, only, pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.1(a)].
4. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1776, Contractor shall maintain and make available an accurate record showing the name of each worker and hours worked each day and each week by each worker employed by Contractor performing services covered by this Agreement.
Contractor and its subcontractors shall furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner in accordance with Labor Code Section 1771.4. The project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. The Contractor is responsible for compliance with Section 1776 by itself and all of its subcontractors. The Contractor shall post job site notices, as prescribed by regulation.
5. Contractor shall comply with and be bound by the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1777.5, 1777.6 and 1777.7 and California Code of Regulations Title 8, Section 200 et seq. concerning the employment of apprentices on public works projects. The Contractor shall be responsible for compliance with these Sections for all apprenticeable occupations. Before commencing Work on this Project, the Contractor shall provide the City with a copy of the information submitted to any applicable apprenticeship program. Within sixty (60) Days after concluding Work, Contractor and each of its Subcontractors shall submit to the City a verified statement of the journeyman and apprentice hours performed under this Contract.
6. Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1813 concerning penalties for workers who work excess hours. The Contractor shall, as a penalty to the City, forfeit twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the execution of the contract by the Contractor or by any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the California Labor Code.
7. California Labor Code Sections 1860 and 3700 provide that every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to its employees. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1861, by signing the Agreement to which this Exhibit is attached, Contractor hereby certifies as follows:
“I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract."
EXHIBIT C
INSURANCE
Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section, or as may otherwise be permitted or required in writing by the City’s risk manager.
Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies to do so.
Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office “occurrence" form CG 0001, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another (cross-liability); or (3) containing any other exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance: Consultant shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned, or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than 1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. The City of Paramount, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be named as additional insureds on such policy.
Cyber Liability: Vendor shall maintain comprehensive cyber liability insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss and $2,000,000 general aggregate. If the coverage is maintained on a claims-made basis, the Vendor shall maintain such coverage for an additional three (3) years following termination of the contract.
For Commercial General Liability and Commercial Automobile Liability (CGL Coverage): The City will be named as an additional insured, under the commercial general liability (“CGL”) liability insurance policy coverage, for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured, and this CGL liability policy protects the additional insured, its officers, agents and employees against liability for personal and bodily injuries, deaths or property damage or destruction arising in any respect, directly or indirectly, in the performance of the contract.
Each such CGL policy shall be endorsed with the following language: The City of Paramount, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees and volunteers are included as insureds with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, including the insured's general supervision of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased or used by the Named Insured.
This CGL policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects the City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by the City, including any self-insured retention the City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverages afforded shall apply as though separate policies had been issued to each insured.
The Additional Insured coverage under the Consultant’s policy shall be primary and non-contributory and will not seek contribution from the City’s insurance or self-insurance and shall be at least as broad as CG 20 01 04 13.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions: Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible, or require proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
Waiver of Subrogation. All policies of Commercial General Liability, Commercial Automobile Liability, and Worker’s Compensation shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss.
Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against the City, its officials, officers, employees, and agents to the extent of such coverage.
Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant shall deliver redacted copies of the required policies or original certificates of insurance and redacted or specimen endorsements issued by their insurer. The Consultant and its insurer are solely responsible for ensuring that the required insurance complies with this Agreement and provides adequate coverage for all services performed. The Consultant shall procure insurance policies that meet the stated standards.
At least fifteen (15) days before any policy expires, or within a reasonable time after policy renewal, the Consultant shall provide evidence of renewal or replacement coverage. If any policy is canceled or reduced, the Consultant must file evidence of reinstatement or replacement coverage within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice of the change.
The City may request copies of insurance policies and endorsements for informational purposes only, without assuming any obligation to verify compliance or adequacy.
WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
WORKERS' COMPENSATION DECLARATION
I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: (ONE OF THE
PARAGRAPHS BELOW MUST BE CHECKED)
□ I have and will maintain a certificate of consent from the California Labor Commission to selfinsure for workers' compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this Agreement. □ I have and will maintain workers' compensation insurance, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work to be performed under this contract. My workers' compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Carrier: Gilbert Cohen Insurance Agency, Inc.
Policy Number : A09519629
□ I certify that, in the performance of the work under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the workers' compensation laws of California, and I hereby agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Paramount and all of its officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, and losses relating to personal injury or death, economic losses, and property damage arising out of my failure to provide such worker’s compensation insurance. I further agree that, if I should become subject to the workers' compensation provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code, I shall forthwith comply with those provisions.
WARNING: FAILURE TO SECURE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COVERAGE IS UNLAWFUL,
AND SHALL SUBJECT AN EMPLOYER TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND CIVIL FINES UP TO ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000), IN ADDITION TO THE COST OF COMPENSATION, DAMAGES AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 3706 OF THE LABOR CODE, INTEREST, AND ATTORNEY’S FEES.
By: _________________________________ Dated: ______________, 20_____ 2025-08-05
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES WHEREAS, the CITY OF PARAMOUNT (“City”), and INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES (“Consultant”) entered into that certain agreement entitled “AGREEMENT FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES,” effective on August 2, 2022, hereinafter referred to as “Original Agreement”; and WHEREAS, the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment to that Original Agreement on February 27, 2024 to amend the rates to account for inflation increases pursuant to the LA-OC Consumer Price Index; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant has requested an increase in their rates of 3.2% to account for inflation increases pursuant to the Los Angeles CPI-U (All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim metropolitan area) reflecting the 12-month increase through June 2025; and WHEREAS, the City has a need for Consultant’s services to provide project implementation and ongoing annual project management/support services for a new security camera system; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant have determined it is in their mutual interest to further amend certain terms of the Original Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Pursuant to Section 5 of the Original Agreement the Term of the Agreement is extended for one year to August 1, 2026.
2. Exhibit A of Original Agreement shall be amended to include an additional scope of work for IT Support and Management of Camera System Project (Phase I) (“Additional Services”), as described in Exhibit A-1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. Section 2(A) of the Original Agreement is amended to include an increased monthly fee of $31,367 {reflecting a 3.2% increase based on the Los Angeles CPI-U (All Urban Consumers, Los Angeles–Long Beach–Anaheim metropolitan area) for June 2025}; a one-time project implementation/coordination fee of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000); and an annual project management/support services fee of Thirteen Thousand Two Hundred Dollars ($13,200) as additional compensation for the Additional Services. The total compensation under the Agreement, including compensation for Additional Services and contingency shall be Four Hundred Nineteen Thousand, Six Hundred and Four Dollars ($419,604).
4. This Amendment shall be effective on August 12, 2025.
3. Except as expressly modified herein, all of the provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the case of any inconsistencies between the Original Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control.
4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the dates set forth besides their signatures below.
CITY OF PARAMOUNT INFINITY TECHNOLOGIES
By: By:
John Moreno, City Manager Mohammad Ahmed, President
ATTEST:
By:
Heidi Luce, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Nicholas R. Ghirelli, City Attorney
EXHIBIT A-1
SCOPE OF WORK
Version March 2025
END USER AGREEMENT
This End User Agreement (“Agreement") is entered into by and between Verkada Inc. (“Verkada”) and CITY OF PARAMOUNT, a CALIFORNIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT (“Customer”), and governs the purchase and use of the Products (as defined below) by Customer. This Agreement is effective as of the date last signed below.
Verkada and Customer agree as follows.
1. DEFINITIONS
The definitions of certain capitalized terms used in this Agreement are set forth below. Others are defined in the body of the Agreement.
“Claim” means any third party claim, action, demand, suit, or proceeding made or brought against a party to this Agreement.
“Customer Data” means all data provided or made accessible by Customer to Verkada through the Products but excludes System Data (defined below).
“Documentation” means the online documentation regarding the Hardware, available at www.verkada.com/docs/ or as otherwise provided within the Hosted Software. “DPA” means the then-current Data Processing Addendum available at https://legal.verkada.com/#cdpa. “Firmware” means the software developed and maintained by Verkada that is stored on the Hardware and enables the basic functioning of the Hardware and its communication with the Hosted Software. “Hardware” means the Verkada hardware products, including security cameras, access control units, alarm units, and environmental sensors.
“Hosted Software” means Verkada’s Software-as-a-Service system, currently known as “Command,” and related infrastructure made available to Customer to manage and configure the Hardware. “License” means each license SKU set forth on a Purchase Order. “License Term” means, subject to Section 2.1 below, the period starting on Product shipment and continuing for the length of time indicated in the License SKU set forth on the applicable Purchase Order (plus a 30 day period).
“Partner” means a third-party authorized by Verkada to resell the Products, to whom Customer has delivered an ordering document to purchase such Products. "Product Feature(s)” means a unique feature set within the Hosted Software that is identified by a particular stock keeping unit (SKU) on a Purchase Order. “Products” means, collectively, the Software, Hardware, Product Features, Documentation, and all modifications, updates, and upgrades thereto and derivative works thereof. “Product-Specific Terms” means the then-current terms for certain features, functionality, and/or services included as part of or with the Products available at https://legal.verkada.com/#product-specific-terms.
Version March 2025
“Purchase Order” means each order document submitted to Verkada by a Partner on behalf of Customer, and accepted by Verkada, indicating Partner’s firm commitment to purchase the Products for the prices set forth therein.
“Service Level Agreement” means the then-current Service Level Agreement available at https://legal.verkada.com/#sla.
“Software” means the Firmware, Hosted Software, and any other software that Verkada makes available for download by the Customer.
“Support” means the technical support services and resources available at www.verkada.com/support. "Supported Third Party Devices" means non-Verkada hardware products, including certain third party wireless locks and/or video cameras, which Customer may manage via the Software. “System Data” means configuration information, log and event data, Product performance data, and statistics regarding Customer’s use of the Products.
“Users” means employees of Customer, or other third parties, each of whom are authorized by Customer to use the Products on Customer’s behalf.
2. LICENSE AND RESTRICTIONS
2.1 License to Customer. When Customer purchases a License, Verkada grants Customer a royalty-free, nonexclusive, non-transferable (except under Section 12) worldwide right during the License Term to use the Software, subject to the terms of this Agreement. Customer must purchase one or more Licenses to use the Software for at least the number and type of Hardware units, Supported Third Party Devices, and/or Product Features that the Customer manages by means of the Software (collectively, “Valid Licensing”); however, Customer may authorize an unlimited number of Users to access and use the Software. If Customer purchases additional Licenses, either in connection with the purchase of additional Hardware units or renewal of Licenses for existing Hardware units, the overall License Term will be modified such that the License Term for all Licenses purchased will expire and terminate on the same date. If Customer does not maintain Valid Licensing, then (i) Customer will have limited or no access to Customer Data, Product Features, and the Software, and (ii) the Hardware will not function as designed.
Certain Products are subject to the Product-Specific Terms.
2.2 License to Verkada. During the License Term, Customer will transfer Customer Data to Verkada while using the Products. Customer grants Verkada a non-exclusive right and license to use, reproduce, modify, store, and process Customer Data solely to maintain the Products and provide them to Customer. Customer represents and warrants that it possesses the necessary rights and authority to grant Verkada the rights set forth in this Section 2.2 with respect to Customer Data.
2.3 Restrictions. Customer will not and will ensure its Users do not: (i) use (or allow a third party to use) the Products for any competitive purposes (other than for routine product comparison purposes), including monitoring or testing their availability, security, performance, or functionality, in each case without Verkada’s express written consent; (ii) market, sublicense, resell, lease, loan, transfer, or otherwise commercially exploit the Products; (iii) modify, create derivative works, decompile, reverse engineer, attempt to gain access to the source code, tamper with the Hardware, or copy the Products or any of their components; (iv) collect any Customer Data with the Products without first providing all required notices or obtaining necessary licenses, authorizations, approvals, or consents (including from data subjects) as required under applicable law; or (v) use the Products to conduct any fraudulent or malicious activities or otherwise in violation of applicable law or regulation (each of (i) through (v), a “Prohibited Use”).
3. COURTESY RETURNS; HARDWARE WARRANTY AND WARRANTY RETURNS Version March 2025
3.1 Courtesy Returns. Customer may return up to $250,000 worth of Products (as reflected in the net price set forth on one or more Purchase Order(s)) for any reason within the 30-day period starting on the shipment date of such Products (a “Courtesy Return”). To initiate a Courtesy Return, Customer must send a request for a Courtesy Return by email within such 30-day period either to (a) the Partner that submitted the Purchase Order(s) for the Products to be returned or (b) the Verkada sales representative responsible for Customer’s account, and include the serial numbers of the Products to be returned.
3.2 Hardware Warranty. Verkada represents to the original purchaser and user of the Hardware that, for the period set forth in the applicable Documentation from the date of shipment to the location specified on the Purchase Order, the Hardware will be substantially free of defects in materials and workmanship (“Hardware Warranty”).
3.3 Remedy for Breach of Hardware Warranty. Customer’s sole and exclusive remedy and Verkada’s (and its suppliers’ and licensors') sole and exclusive liability for a breach of the Hardware Warranty will be, in Verkada’s sole discretion, to replace the non-conforming Hardware. Replacement may be made with a new or refurbished product or components. If the Hardware or a component within it is no longer available, then Verkada may replace the Hardware unit with a similar product of similar function. Any Hardware unit that has been replaced under the Hardware Warranty will be covered by the terms of the Hardware Warranty for the longer of (a) 90 days from the date of the delivery, or (b) the remainder of the original Hardware Warranty period. Customers engaging in a Prohibited Use serves to void the Hardware Warranty.
3.4 Warranty Returns. To request a return under the Hardware Warranty, Customer must notify Verkada or the Partner within the Hardware Warranty period. To initiate a return directly to Verkada, Customer must send a return request to Verkada at [email protected] and clearly state details on where and when Customer purchased the Hardware, the serial numbers of the applicable Hardware unit(s), Customer’s reason for returning the Hardware, and Customer’s name, mailing address, email address, and daytime phone number. If approved, Verkada will provide Customer with a Return Materials Authorization (“RMA”) and prepaid shipping label via email that must be included with Customer’s return shipment to Verkada. Customer must return the Hardware unit(s) listed in the RMA with all included accessories with the RMA within the 14 days following the day on which Verkada issued the RMA.
4. VERKADA OBLIGATIONS
4.1 General. Verkada will provide the Products in conformance with this Agreement, the Purchase Order(s), applicable Documentation, and Verkada will perform its obligations under this Agreement in compliance with applicable law.
4.2 Availability. Verkada will make the Hosted Software available in accordance with the terms of the Service Level Agreement.
4.3 Support. Verkada will provide Support to Customer in order to resolve any errors, bugs, or similar issues Customer experiences with the Products or provide a suitable workaround. The fee for Support is included in the cost of the License. As part of a Support case, Customer may grant access, in its sole discretion, to a member of Verkada’s Support team through functionality provided in the Hosted Software for a length of time determined by Customer.
4.4 Maintenance. Verkada will use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the Products and implement updates, upgrades, and fixes as necessary to meet its obligations under this Agreement.
5. CUSTOMER OBLIGATIONS
5.1 Payment; Compliance. Customer is responsible for paying Partner for the Products pursuant to Partner’s invoice(s). If Customer is delinquent on fees, Verkada may pursue payment directly from Customer if Partner is unable to or chooses not to pursue such fees itself. Customer will, and will Version March 2025
ensure its Users, use the Products only in accordance with the Documentation and in compliance with all applicable laws. Customer will not export or re-export the Products or use the Products to provide services in violation of applicable export and economic sanctions laws and regulations. If Customer operates in a regulated industry, Customer represents that it has obtained all necessary licenses and/or permits necessary to operate its business and complies with all applicable laws regarding the conduct of its business. Verkada reserves the right to suspend use of any Products operating in violation of the obligations of this Section 5.1, following written notice to Customer.
5.2 Account Administration. Customer is responsible for identifying individuals within Customer’s organization to act as administrator(s) of Customer’s account. Such person(s) will, among other things, monitor and manage access privileges of other Users and have the authority to act for Customer in connection with any actions, such as feature opt-ins, taken by such persons within the Hosted Software.
Customer will verify, including ensuring that any third-party installer verifies, that all Hardware Products purchased are properly claimed into Customer’s account within the Hosted Software before installation, and on renewal, as described in the Documentation.
6. TERM AND TERMINATION
6.1 Term. The term of this Agreement will commence on the Effective Date and will continue for the duration of the License Term.
6.2 Termination for Cause; Suspension. Either party may terminate this Agreement for cause (i) if the other party commits a material breach of this Agreement and, if such breach is capable of remedy, fails to remedy the breach within 30 days of being notified to do so;, or (ii) if the other party becomes the subject of a petition in bankruptcy or any other proceeding relating to insolvency, receivership, liquidation or assignment for the benefit of creditors. For purposes of clarity, a material breach of the Agreement includes Customer’s failure to purchase and/or maintain a sufficient number of Licenses, as required by Section 2.1. Verkada may temporarily suspend Customer’s use of the Products or access to the Hosted Software if necessary to comply with applicable law.
6.3 Effect of Termination. If the Agreement expires or terminates, then all rights to access the Hosted Software (including Customer Data) will terminate. If Customer terminates this Agreement in accordance with Section 6.2, then, in addition to all other remedies available to Customer under this Agreement, Verkada will refund Customer (via the Partner) a pro rata portion of any prepaid fees applicable to the remaining License Term. The following provisions will survive any expiration or termination of the Agreement: Sections 2.3, 6.3, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12, and any other provisions that, by their nature, would reasonably be considered intended to survive.
7. CONFIDENTIALITY
7.1 Confidential Information. Except as explicitly excluded below, any information of a confidential or proprietary nature provided by a party (“Disclosing Party”) to the other party (“Receiving Party”) constitutes the Disclosing Party’s confidential information (“Confidential Information”). Verkada’s Confidential Information includes the Products and any information conveyed to Customer in connection with Support. Customer’s Confidential Information includes Customer Data. Confidential Information does not include information which is: (i) already known by the receiving party without an obligation of confidentiality other than under this Agreement; (ii) publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (iii) rightfully received from a third party without a confidentiality obligation to the Disclosing Party; or (iv) independently developed by the Receiving Party without access to the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information.
7.2 Confidentiality Obligations. Each party will use the Confidential Information of the other party only as necessary to perform its obligations under this Agreement, will not disclose the Confidential Information to any third party, and will protect the confidentiality of the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information with a reasonable standard of care. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Receiving Party may share the other party’s Confidential Information with those of its employees, agents and representatives Version March 2025
who have a need to know such information and who are bound by confidentiality obligations at least as restrictive as those contained herein (each, a “Representative”). Each party shall be responsible for any breach of confidentiality by its Representatives.
7.3 Additional Exclusions. A Receiving Party will not violate its confidentiality obligations if it discloses the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information if required by applicable law, including the California Public Records Act, by court order, subpoena, or similar instrument so long as the Receiving Party (if legally permitted) provides the Disclosing Party with written notice of the required disclosure to allow the Disclosing Party to contest or seek to limit the disclosure or obtain a protective order. If no protective order or other remedy is obtained, the Receiving Party will furnish only that portion of the Confidential Information that is legally required, and agrees to exercise reasonable efforts to ensure that confidential treatment will be accorded to the Confidential Information so disclosed.
8. DATA PROTECTION
Verkada secures the Software and Customer Data in accordance with the security practices available at www.verkada.com/trust/security-controls. Verkada will process all Customer Data in accordance with the DPA.
9. OWNERSHIP
9.1 Verkada Property. Verkada owns and retains all right, title, and interest in and to the Software and the System Data, and owns all intellectual property embodied in the Hardware and accessories. Except for the limited license granted to Customer in Section 2.1, Verkada does not transfer any rights in the Products to Customer, and Customer will take no action inconsistent with Verkada’s intellectual property rights in the Products.
9.2 Customer Property. Customer owns and retains all right, title, and interest in and to the Customer Data and does not transfer any rights in the Customer Data to Verkada, except for the limited license set forth in Section 2.2. For the avoidance of doubt, Customer Data will be retained until the earliest to occur of: (1) the retention period for the applicable Hardware Product specified in the Documentation, plus any purchased extended cloud backup period; and (2) 90 days following a written request from Customer to delete it. However, archived video footage and person-of-interest data will be retained until the earliest to occur of: (a) Customer deleting it via the Hosted Software; and (b) 90 days following a written request from Customer to delete it.
10. INDEMNIFICATION
10.1 By Verkada. Verkada will indemnify and defend Customer, its affiliates, and their respective owners, directors, members, officers, and employees (collectively, “Customer Indemnitees”) from and against any Claim, and the reasonable attorneys’ fees and court and investigative costs of Customer Indemnitees, alleging that Customer’s use of the Products infringes or misappropriates any patent, trademark, copyright, or any other intellectual property of such third party.
Verkada will pay any damages finally awarded against any Customer Indemnitees by a court of competent jurisdiction as a result of any such Claim, or any final settlement of such Claim, so long as Customer (i) gives Verkada prompt written notice of the Claim, (ii) gives Verkada sole control of the defense and settlement of the Claim (provided that Verkada may not settle any Claim without the Customer Indemnitee’s written consent, which will not be unreasonably withheld), and (iii) provides to Verkada all reasonable assistance, at Verkada’s request and expense.
If Customer’s right to use the Products hereunder is, or in Verkada’s opinion is likely to be, enjoined as the result of a Claim, then Verkada may, at Verkada’s sole option and expense procure for Customer the right to continue using the Products under the terms of this Agreement, or replace or modify the Products so as to be non-infringing and substantially equivalent in function to the claimed infringing or enjoined Products.
Version March 2025
Verkada will have no indemnification obligations under this Section 10.1 to the extent that a Claim is based on or arises from: (a) use of the Products in a manner other than as expressly permitted in this Agreement; (b) any alteration or modification of the Products except as expressly authorized by Verkada; (c) the combination of the Products with any other software, product, or services (to the extent that the alleged infringement arises from such combination); or (d) specifications provided by Customer. This Section 10.1 sets forth Verkada’s sole and exclusive liability, and Customer’s exclusive remedies, for any Claim of infringement or misappropriation of intellectual property.
10.2 By Customer. Customer will indemnify and defend Verkada, its affiliates, and their respective owners, directors, members, officers, and employees (together, the “Verkada Indemnitees”) from and against any Claim, and the attorneys’ fees and court and investigative costs of Verkada Indemnitees, related to: (a) Customer or its Users engaging in a Prohibited Use; and (b) Customer’s indemnity obligations under the Product-Specific Terms (if applicable). Customer will pay any damages finally awarded against any Verkada Indemnitee by a court of competent jurisdiction as a result of any such Claim, or any final settlement of such Claim, so long as Verkada (i) gives Customer prompt written notice of the Claim, (ii) gives Customer sole control of the defense and settlement of the Claim (provided that Customer may not settle any Claim without Verkada’s prior written consent which will not be unreasonably withheld), and (iii) provides to Customer all reasonable assistance, at Customer’s request and expense.
Customer will have no indemnification obligations under this Section 10.2 to the extent that a Claim is based on or arises from: (a) Verkada’s fraud, willful misconduct, or gross negligence in breach of this Agreement; or (b) violation of applicable law.
11. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
11.1 Disclaimer. EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES EXPLICITLY SET FORTH IN THIS
AGREEMENT, VERKADA EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, WHETHER
EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY RELATING TO THE PRODUCTS OR SUPPORT, OR ANY
MATERIALS OR SERVICES FURNISHED OR PROVIDED TO CUSTOMER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT. WITHOUT LIMITING THE FOREGOING, VERKADA HEREBY DISCLAIMS ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NONINFRINGEMENT, AND TITLE. VERKADA DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE PRODUCTS WILL MEET CUSTOMER’S NEEDS OR EXPECTATIONS, THAT USE OF THE PRODUCTS WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR ERROR-FREE, OR THAT DEFECTS WILL BE CORRECTED. VERKADA MAKES
NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO THE ACCURACY OR RELIABILITY OF ANY
FEATURES WITHIN THE HOSTED SOFTWARE THAT MAKE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OR
MACHINE LEARNING MODELS, INCLUDING FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY, AND DISCLAIMS
ANY RESPONSIBILITY OR WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO ANY FALSE IDENTIFICATION OR MISIDENTIFICATION ARISING FROM USE OF SUCH FEATURES. CUSTOMER AGREES THAT THESE FEATURES ARE PROVIDED ON AN “AS IS” BASIS, AND THE ENTIRE RISK
AS TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THESE FEATURES AND THE QUALITY OF THE INFORMATION DERIVED THEREFROM IS WITH CUSTOMER. IF ANY OF SUCH INFORMATION IS INCORRECT, CUSTOMER ASSUMES THE COST OF ANY CORRECTION.
11.2 No Consequential Damages. NEITHER PARTY, NOR ITS AFFILIATES, NOR THE
OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, SHAREHOLDERS, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES OF
ANY OF THEM, WILL BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER PARTY FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, SPECIAL,
EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, WHETHER FORESEEABLE OR UNFORESEEABLE,
THAT MAY ARISE OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, EVEN IF THE OTHER
PARTY HAS BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OR LIKELIHOOD OF SUCH DAMAGES OR COSTS
OCCURRING AND WHETHER SUCH LIABILITY IS BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, PRODUCTS LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE.
11.3 Direct Damages Cap. EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO EXCLUDED CLAIMS AND
UNCAPPED CLAIMS, IN NO EVENT WILL THE COLLECTIVE LIABILITY OF EITHER PARTY, OR THEIR
RESPECTIVE AFFILIATES, OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, SHAREHOLDERS, AGENTS AND
REPRESENTATIVES, TO THE OTHER PARTY FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, INJURIES, AND Version March 2025
LOSSES ARISING FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AND CAUSES OF ACTION ARISING OUT OF OR IN
ANY WAY RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT, EXCEED THE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID OR PAYABLE BY CUSTOMER FOR THE USE OF THE PRODUCTS UNDER THIS AGREEMENT DURING THE 24-MONTH PERIOD PRECEDING THE DATE OF THE CLAIM (THE “FEES PAID”).
THE EXISTENCE OF MULTIPLE CLAIMS OR SUITS UNDER OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT
WILL NOT ENLARGE OR EXTEND THE LIMITATION OF MONEY DAMAGES WHICH WILL BE THE CLAIMANT’S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY.
11.4 Excluded Claims Cap. “Excluded Claims” means any claim and/or liability associated with:
(a) both party’s indemnification obligations in Section 10; (b) any breach by Verkada of the DPA, Section 8 (Data Protection), or other data privacy and security obligations. Each party’s total, cumulative liability for all Excluded Claims will not exceed the greater of (i) two (2) times the Fees Paid, and (ii) $250,000.
11.5 Uncapped Claims. “Uncapped Claims” means any claim or liability associated with: (a) Customer’s breach of Section 2.2 (License to Customer Data), Section 5.1 (Compliance), and Sections A.3 and A.7 of the Product-Specific Terms (if applicable); (b) either Party’s breach of confidentiality (but excluding any liability associated with Verkada’s security obligations with respect to Customer Data, which remains subject to the Excluded Claims cap); or (c) any liability of a Party which cannot be limited under applicable law, including gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct. Neither Party will be entitled to any limit on direct damages as set forth in Section 11.3 with respect to Uncapped Claims.
12. INSURANCE
Cyber-Risk Liability Insurance. Verkada shall procure and maintain insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss, $2,000,000 general aggregate, which shall include coverage for: (a) damage arising from destruction or corruption of data, including but not limited to virus transmission, unauthorized access, denial of service, and loss of income from network security failures, and (b) liability arising from theft, dissemination or use of customer or third-party information stored in
electronic form.
13. Errors and Omissions Liability Insurance. Verkada shall procure and maintain insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss, $2,000,000 general aggregate, which shall include coverage for legal liability for a financial loss to third parties due to negligent acts, errors and omissions which are committed in the course of business and arising from providing Verkada products or services.
14. MISCELLANEOUS
This Agreement, including the DPA, Product-Specific Terms, and the Service Level Agreement, which are hereby incorporated by reference into the Agreement, is the entire agreement between Customer and Verkada and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements and understandings concerning its subject matter and may not be amended or modified except by a writing signed or electronically acknowledged by authorized personnel by both parties. Customer and Verkada are independent contractors, and this Agreement will not establish any relationship of partnership, joint venture, or agency between Customer and Verkada. Failure to exercise any right under this Agreement will not constitute a waiver. There are no third-party beneficiaries to this Agreement. Any notice provided by one party to the other under this Agreement will be in writing and sent either (i) by overnight courier or certified mail (receipt requested), in the case of Customer to Customer’s address on record in Verkada’s account information and in the case of Verkada, to 406 E. 3rd Ave., San Mateo, CA 94401, or (ii) by electronic mail to Customer’s email address on record in Verkada’s account information or to Verkada at [email protected]. If Version March 2025
any provision of this Agreement is found unenforceable, the Agreement will be construed as if such provision had not been included. Neither party may assign this Agreement without the prior, written consent of the other party, except that either party may assign this Agreement without such consent in connection with an acquisition of the assigning party or a sale of all or substantially all of its assets. In the event of an assignment by Customer in connection with an acquisition of Customer or a sale of all or substantially all of Customer’s assets, Customer’s License may be transferred to the party acquiring Customer or purchasing all or substantially all of its assets, subject to Verkada’s prior written consent, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. Electronic copies of such signed copies will be deemed to be binding originals.
A party will not be liable for any failure to perform caused by circumstances beyond its reasonable control including, but not limited to, acts of God, fire, flood, acts of war, pandemics, government action, accident, labor difficulties or shortage, inability to obtain materials, equipment or transportation (each, a “Force Majeure Event”). If a Force Majeure Event lasts longer than five (5) business days, the parties will meet to determine if performance under the Agreement can resume as agreed. If the parties cannot agree, then the Customer or Verkada may terminate the applicable Purchase Order or this Agreement.
Except as set forth in Section 13 below, all claims, disputes, or controversies arising out of or relating to this Agreement are governed by the laws of California without reference to conflict of law rules. If any disputes arise, the parties will first attempt to resolve the dispute informally via good faith negotiation. If the dispute has not been resolved after 30 days, the parties will resolve any claim, dispute, or controversy (excluding any claims for injunctive or other equitable relief) by non-binding arbitration before a single arbitrator administered by JAMS, its successors and assigns, in San Mateo County, California, unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, and pursuant to its arbitration rules. Each party will be responsible for paying any arbitration fees in accordance with the foregoing rules, and the award rendered by the arbitrator may include costs of arbitration, reasonable attorneys’ fees and reasonable costs for expert and other witnesses. Upon the parties’ agreement, any judgment on the award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court of competent jurisdiction. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to prevent either party from seeking injunctive or other equitable relief from the courts as necessary to prevent the actual or threatened infringement, misappropriation, or violation of its data security, intellectual property rights, or other proprietary rights.
15. U.S. PUBLIC SECTOR CUSTOMERS
Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, if Customer is a:
(i) U.S. federal government entity, then (a) the Agreement is governed by applicable U.S. federal law, (b) Customer’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement will be limited to the extent allowed by applicable U.S. federal law, and (c) if Customer is legally prohibited from providing any indemnity, none will apply. Also, this Agreement shall not be construed in derogation of the U.S. Department of Justice’s right to defend any claim or action brought against the U.S. In addition, the Products (including the Software and Documentation) consist of commercial items, including commercial computer software and associated documentation, as defined in applicable U.S. Federal Acquisition Regulations and the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, and were developed solely at private expense. As such, Customer’s rights in the Software and Documentation are as set forth in this Agreement. (ii) U.S. state, county, or city entity, then (a) Customer’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement will be limited to the extent allowed by applicable state law without waiving sovereign immunity, and (b) if Customer is legally prohibited from providing any indemnity, none will apply.
Signatures on following page
Version March 2025
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives.
CITY OF PARAMOUNT Verkada Inc.
By: [counterpartySignerSignature_IYOjFQn] By: [verkadaSignerSignature_M4uDoIM ]
Name
:
[counterpartySignerName_TzJJvq0] Name
:
[verkadaSignerName_1aGED1i]
Title: [counterpartySignerTitle_szlECQY] Title: [verkadaSignerTitle_zBbDvCc] Date: [counterpartySignerDateField_kNa1rH9
]
Date: [verkadaSignerDateField_7nntAUp]
To: Honorable City Council
From: John Moreno, City Manager
By: Grissel Chavez, Assistant City Manager
John King, Planning and Building Director
Monica Rodriguez, Assistant Planning and
Building Director
Date: August 12, 2025
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT AN ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
LOAN AGREEMENT AND REGULATORY AGREEMENT FOR AN
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT 16635, 16675, AND 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD; CONSIDERATION OF AN ADDENDUM TO
A PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
ASSOCIATED MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT
BACKGROUND
In 2023, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment (GPA) No. 22-1 and Zone Change No. 239 for a senior assisted/independent living facility encompassing three parcels along Paramount Boulevard, at 16635, 16675 and 16683 Paramount Boulevard.
In 2022, the Development Review Board approved Development Review Application (DRA) No. 22:001. The senior /assisted independent living facility was never developed on the site. Since that time, a prospective purchaser of the site has proposed an updated project for a market-rate and affordable single-family residential development.
Gold Key Development, Inc., the project applicant, is proposing to develop the 1.04-acre site with a total of seventeen (17) detached, single-family residential units, including three (3) units designated as affordable housing. Gold Key Development has a track record of building similar single-family housing in the City over the past 30 years.
The proposed agreements would provide $2,075,000 in City general funds to the project to assist with the acquisition and development costs in exchange for the developer remediating the blighted site, ensuring the project is completed, and maintaining the three affordable units as affordable to moderate rate buyers for at least 45 years.
DISCUSSION
The proposed residential development will feature:
• Seventeen (17) two-story, detached single-family homes • Three floor plan types:
o Plan A: 9 units, 1,875 sq. ft., 4 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms (market rate) o Plan B: 5 units, 1,725 sq. ft., 3 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms (market rate) Agenda Report August 12, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25:029 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 2 o Plan C: 3 units, 1,707 sq. ft., 3 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms (affordable) • Each unit includes a two-car garage and two additional driveway parking spaces • Site access is provided via the rear alley; pedestrian access is oriented towards Paramount Boulevard
• The units will be arranged in a linear configuration with consistent setbacks, driveways, and landscaping to maintain visual cohesion along the corridor Planning Commission Action:
This project’s entitlements, inclusive of a tentative tract map, design review, general plan amendment, and zone change was reviewed at the August 6, 2025 Planning Commission meeting and recommended for City Council approval. Regarding the required California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) consideration for the project, the review included an addendum to a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) in connection with the required applications to effectuate approval of the 17-unit detached single-family homes. The previously adopted MND and associated monitoring plan is attached as Attachment 1.
In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City, as lead agency, may prepare an addendum to a previously adopted MND if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary and none of the circumstances outlined in Section 15162 requiring a subsequent MND have occurred. The City has prepared an Addendum to the MND (“Addendum”) for the Modified Project under CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. The Modified Project does not require a new MND per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. On January 24, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23:001, approving an MND for a proposed 60-unit assisted living senior facility (“Project”). This 60-unit facility was never built. Scaled down revisions to the project scope have since been proposed, involving the construction of 17 single-family residential units on the project location.
The Addendum and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program for the proposed project, which provides a detailed description of the Modified Project and mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, are attached as Attachment 2.
City Council approval of the attached Resolution No. 25:09 adopting the addendum to a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program for the proposed project as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), is required for the project to proceed.
The following actions will be scheduled for City Council approval at the September 23, 2025 City Council meeting.
Zone Change No. 252 to Planned Development with Performance Standards (PD-PS)/Multiple-Family Residential
General Plan Amendment (GPA No. 25-2) to Mixed-Use Commercial and MultipleFamily Residential land use designation Agenda Report August 12, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25:029 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 3 Pre-Development Loan & Regulatory Agreement
To facilitate project implementation, including funding the proposed site acquisition and development costs, staff has proposed an Acquisition andDevelopment Loan Agreement with Gold Key Development, Inc. in the total amount of Two Million SeventyFive Thousand Dollars ($2,075,000). The loan is structured in three components:
1. Acquisition Portion – $1,075,000
a. $500,000 disbursed at the close of escrow on 16635 Paramount Blvd – former church site
b. $575,000 disbursed at the close of escrow on 16675 and 16683 Paramount Blvd
2. Pre-Development Portion – $500,000
a. Disbursed when the building permit is issued for the first six (6) residential units
3. Development Portion – $500,000
a. Disbursed upon the temporary certificate of occupancy being issued for the first six (6) residential units
In addition, a Regulatory Agreement will be executed to ensure the long-term affordability and income restrictions for the three (3) Plan C units, for a 45-year period; to be sold to buyers meeting low to moderate income levels; and ongoing compliance with affordable housing monitoring and reporting requirements.
Justification for City Contribution and Neighborhood Impact Staff evaluated the proposed financial contribution of $2,075,000 to Gold Key Development, Inc. and has determined the amount to be reasonable and justified based on multiple factors associated with both the project’s public benefit and the developer’s incurred costs.
• Affordable Housing, the City’s investment will directly support the inclusion of three income-restricted affordable units within the project. These units will be offered at reduced purchase prices to qualified households meeting low to moderate income levels, resulting in a significant revenue loss to the developer.
The City’s funding will help bridge this financial gap and ensure the delivery of high-quality affordable housing in Paramount.
• Environmental Remediation the project site includes environmental remediation obligations due to an abandoned underground storage tank located on one of the parcels. Cleanup and compliance with environmental regulations has created additional cost burdens for the developer, which are not typically associated with standard infill residential projects.
• Public Improvements the developer will also be responsible for offsite improvements in the public right-of-way, including infrastructure upgrades to sidewalks, alley approaches, and curb/gutter work, as well as streetscape Agenda Report August 12, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25:029 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 4 enhancements. These improvements will benefit not only the project itself but also the surrounding neighborhood and City infrastructure.
• Blight and Public Nuisance Elimination Two of the three project parcels have been vacant for several years, contributing to visible blight, illegal dumping, trespassing, and recurring homeless encampments. The former bar site (16683 Paramount Boulevard) remains standing in a deteriorated condition and has become a consistent source of complaints and code enforcement responses. The former church site (16635 Paramount Boulevard) was demolished several years ago and remains a vacant lot, similarly impacted by neglect. The third site (16675 Paramount Boulevard) is occupied by an auto body business primarily used for outdoor vehicle storage, which violates zoning regulations and does not contribute positively to the visual character of the neighborhood.
This housing development represents a transformational improvement to the southern entryway into the City. It will enhance the physical condition of the area, eliminate longstanding public nuisances, and bring high-quality architecture, landscaping, and activity to a corridor in need of reinvestment. The City’s contribution facilitates this outcome while advancing important affordable housing and neighborhood revitalization goals.
The City has a history of providing financial assistance for development projects that generate substantial community value. For example, the City previously contributed $2,063,000 in June 2023 toward the construction of a City museum space within the existing former Paramount Saw building — a cultural and community-serving investment that mirrors the type of long-term value generated by this proposed residential development.
This project represents a significant opportunity to provide new, high-quality housing; including affordable ownership opportunities in Paramount. Approval of the PreDevelopment Loan, Regulatory Agreement, and environmental addendum will position the project for timely implementation and help meet the City’s housing goals.
If approved by City Council, the developer anticipates the completion of the housing project by end of 2027.
FISCAL IMPACT
Currently, the FY 2024-25 carryover and FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget include a combined total of $2,000,000 for this affordable housing project (CIP #9570) funded through the General Fund and Housing Authority Fund.
An additional appropriation of $75,000 from the Capital Projects Fund (Fund 112) is required to fully fund this project. Staff also recommends swapping out the $300,000 budgeted in the Housing Authority (Fund 214) with the Capital Projects Fund (Fund 112) instead.
Agenda Report August 12, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. 25:029 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Page 5 With City Council approval, staff will proceed with a budget amendment as shown below, to reflect these changes, increasing the total project budget to $2,075,000.
A summary of the revised project funding is provided below:
Funding Source FY 25 Budget
(Carryover)
FY 26 Adopted
Budget
Proposed
Adjustment
Revised
Total
112-GF $668,000 $1,032,000 $- $1,700,000
214- Housing Authority 300,000 - (300,000) -
112- Capital Projects
Fund
- - 375,000 375,000
Total $968,000 $1,032,000 $75,000 $2,075,000
The City’s financial contribution of $2,075,000 to Gold Key Development, Inc. will be provided as a structured Pre-Development Loan using the City's general fund. The loan would be forgiven upon completion of the project, maintenance of the affordable units for 45 years, and satisfaction of other terms and conditions have been met.
Loan disbursements are conditioned on project milestones, with full repayment and/or affordability covenants required in accordance with the executed Loan and Regulatory Agreements.
VISION, MISSION, VALUES, AND STRATEGIC OUTCOMES
The City’s Vision, Mission, and Values set the standard for the organization, establish priorities, uniformity and guidelines; and provide the framework for policy decision making. The Strategic Outcomes were implemented to provide a pathway to achieving the City’s Vision. This item aligns with Strategic Outcome No 3: Economic Health - Support a healthy, sustainable economy reflecting community values.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Approve a budget adjustment to increase the proposed affordable housing project budget to $2,075,000; by allocating an additional $75,000 in general funds; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 25:029 adopting the addendum to a previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting program in conjunction with City funding of a proposed 17-unit single-family residential project at 16635, 16675, and 16683 Paramount Boulevard as required by the California Environmental Quality Act; and
3) Approve an Acquisition and Development Loan Agreement with Gold Key Development, Inc. to support the development of affordable housing units at 16635, 16675, and 16683 Paramount Boulevard; and
4) Approve and authorize execution of a Regulatory Agreement ensuring long-term affordability for designated units, and associated attachments; and 5) Authorize the City Manager to make non-material changes to the above documents that do not increase costs to the City and authorize the execution of all other documents needed to complete the loan transaction.
Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Case Numbers:
General Plan Amendment No. 22-1 / Zone Change No. 239
Development Review Application No. 22:001
LEAD AGENCY:
City of Paramount
Planning Department,
Planning Division
16400 Colorado Avenue
Paramount, CA 90723
Contact: John Carver, Planning Director
APPLICANT:
ZT Architecture +
Land Development Inc.
5757 W. Century Blvd. Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90045
November 2022
PREPARED BY:
4165 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 290
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Contact: Tim Rosenstein
Project Manager
(818) 879-4700
CORPORATION
Paramount UMC
Mixed-use Senior Assisted
Living Facility
Attachment 1
PARAMOUNT UMC MIXED-USE SENIOR ASSISTED
LIVING FACILITY
DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Case Numbers:
General Plan Amendment No. 22-1
Zone Change No. 239
Development Review Application No. 22:001
Lead Agency:
CITY OF PARAMOUNT
Planning Department, Planning Division
16400 Colorado Avenue
Paramount, CA 90723
Contact: John Carver, Planning Director
Applicant:
ZT ARCHITECTURE + LAND DEVELOPMENT INC.
5757 W. Century Blvd. Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Prepared by:
ENVICOM CORPORATION
4165 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd. Suite 290
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Tim Rosenstein, Project Manager
(818) 879-4700
November 2022
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount i November 2022
SECTION PAGE NUMBER
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY 3
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 10
I. Aesthetics 12
II. Agriculture and Forestry Resources 14
III. Air Quality 15
IV. Biological Resources 22
V. Cultural Resources 26
VI. Energy 29
VII. Geology and Soils 32
VIII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 37
IX. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 45
X. Hydrology and Water Quality 50
XI. Land Use and Planning 54
XII. Mineral Resources 56
XIII. Noise 57
XIV. Population and Housing 67
XV. Public Services 68
XVI. Recreation 70
XVII. Transportation 71
XVIII. Tribal Cultural Resources 74
XIX. Utilities and Service Systems 77
XX. Wildfire 83
XXI. Mandatory Findings of Significance 84
5.0 REFERENCES 86
6.0 PREPARERS 88
TABLES
Table III-1 SCAQMD Daily Maximum Emissions Thresholds 17 Table III-2 Construction Activity Maximum Daily Emissions 18 Table III-3 Daily Operational Emissions 19
Table III-4 LST – Maximum On-site Construction Emissions 20 Table VI-1 Total Fuel Consumption During Project Construction 30 Table VIII-1 Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions 39
Table VIII-2 Project Consistency with the SCAG RTP/SCS 40 Table VIII-3 Project Consistency with CAP Measures 42
Table XIII-1 Paramount Municipal Code Noise Standards 58 Table XIII-2 Construction Equipment Noise Levels 60
Table XIII-3 Reduced Construction Noise Levels at Sensitive Receptors 61 Table XIII-4 Vibration Damage Criteria Guidelines 64
Table XIII-5 Human Response to Groundborne Vibration Criteria 64
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount ii November 2022
Table XIII-6 Ground Vibration from Project Construction Equipment at Nearest Residence 65 Table XVII-1 Estimated Trip Generation 72
Table XIX-1 Project Water Demand 79
Table XIX-2 Project Wastewater Generation per Day 80
Table XIX-3 Operational Solid Waste Generation 81
FIGURES
Figure 3.1 Regional Location Map 5
Figure 3.2 Vicinity Map 6
Figure 3.3 First & Second Floor Plans 8
Figure 3.4 Front Elevation 9
APPENDICES
Appendix A CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 Computer Model Output Appendix B Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment
Appendix C Construction Fuel Consumption Worksheet
Appendix D Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Appendix E Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 1 November 2022
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) is to disclose and evaluate the environmental impacts of the 60-unit Paramount UMC (United Methodist Church) Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility (“project”), to be located on an approximately 1.04-acre infill site at 16635-16683 Paramount Boulevard (“project site” or “site”) in the Central Business District (CBD) in the City of Paramount (City).
PROJECT SUMMARY
The project proposes to redevelop three parcels totaling 1.04 acres (45,500 square-feet) which currently contain three vacant structures including a church complex, an auto repair garage, and a bar. The church complex consists of a chapel and community building with an approximately 21,200 square-foot footprint and 8,000 square-foot surface parking lot. The auto repair garage is approximately 2,200 square-feet with a 5,200 square-foot parking lot, and the bar is approximately 2,500 square-feet with a 1,900 square-foot parking lot. The project will demolish the existing buildings and associated hardscape and construct an approximately 100,000 gross square-foot, three-story senior living facility to house up to 105 residents within 60 units. Units consist of seven independent living units, six of which will be income-restricted, and 15 single-occupancy and 38 double-occupancy assisted-living units. The building will include a 67-space, approximately 25,500 square-foot parking garage, administrative offices, classrooms, activity and community rooms, a chapel, kitchens, dining rooms, exercise rooms, outdoor patio areas, and two retail suites. The density of the project will be 57.7 dwelling units per acre. The infill project site is located on a major arterial road within a commercial corridor, in a fully urbanized area surrounded on all sides by developed properties. A general plan amendment and zone change for the northern parcel will be necessary to develop the site. The two southern parcels were previously entitled for a senior living facility and have already had their zoning and plan designation changed for that purpose.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
This IS/MND has been prepared for the City of Paramount, the Lead Agency for the project, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (Public Resources Code 21000–21189) and relevant provisions of the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000–15387), as amended.
Initial Study. Section 15063(c) of the CEQA Guidelines defines an Initial Study as the proper preliminary method of analyzing the potential environmental consequences of a project. To paraphrase from this Section, the relevant purposes of an Initial Study are:
(1) To provide the Lead Agency with the necessary information to decide whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND); (2) To enable the Lead Agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts, thus avoiding the need to prepare an EIR; and
(3) To provide sufficient technical analysis of the environmental effects of a project to permit a judgment based on the record as a whole, that the environmental effects of a project have been adequately mitigated.
Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration. CEQA Guidelines Section 15070 states a public agency shall prepare a Negative Declaration or MND for a project subject to CEQA when:
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 2 November 2022
(a) The initial study shows that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment; or (b) The initial study identifies potentially significant effects, but:
1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by the applicant before a proposed MND and initial study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and
2. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.
A MND may be used to satisfy the requirements of CEQA when a project would have no significant unmitigable effects on the environment.
2.0 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 3 November 2022
2.0 FINDINGS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY
The analysis in this IS/MND demonstrates that with the implementation of mitigation measures, the project would have a less than significant impact on the environment with regard to all CEQA Checklist issues.
For each issue addressed in Section 4.0, the impacts associated with development of the project have been determined to be “Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated,” “Less than Significant,” or “No Impact.” For issues that were determined to be “Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated,” mitigation measures have been identified that would reduce impacts to below a level of significance.
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 4 November 2022
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT LOCATION AND EXISTING USES
The project site consists of three parcels totaling approximately 1.04 acres (45,500 square-feet) located at the southwest corner of East 70th Street and Paramount Boulevard, extending north along the Boulevard, addressed as 16635 to 16683 Paramount Boulevard. The property is located between Harrison Street to the north and bordered by 70th Street to the south. Paramount Boulevard is a major arterial which bisects the City from north to south, and 70th Street serves as the southern limit of the City. The subject parcels take up roughly 80 percent of the block it occupies, with just one parcel above to the north. An alley serves the rear of the site and separates it from the buildings behind it to the west. The subject properties are developed with a chapel and community building circa 1956 and 1960 to the north, an auto repair garage dating to 1953 in the middle, and a bar originally constructed in the late 1920s in the southernmost parcel. The parcel containing the chapel is zoned C-3 General Commercial, and has a General Plan Designation of Area Plan, lying within the CBD Area Plan. The two parcels below it are zoned PD-PS, Planned DevelopmentPerformance Standards, with a land use designation of Mixed-Use Commercial Residential. The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN) comprising the lots are 7102-031-020, 7102-031-021, 7102-031-022, and 7102- 031-024.
The site is within an urbanized area surrounded by a mix of uses. The northernmost lot of the site is currently zoned for commercial activity, while the southern lots have been recently rezoned to allow residential use.
All of the parcels are located within the CBD area. This district begins at 70th Street and runs north for roughly a mile, encompassing all of the parcels fronting Paramount Blvd., and includes all of the parcels fronting Alondra Blvd. as it runs east of Paramount Blvd. The southern parcels had their land use designation recently changed so they are no longer bound by Area Plan provisions, and the northern parcel’s designation will change with the currently requested entitlement for the same purpose. East of the business district the majority of land is zoned for residential use, both single family and multi-family. West of the business district, occupying roughly 30 percent of the City, is a large area containing properties zoned for manufacturing. Directly adjacent to the west of the project site, beginning on the other side of the alley, is a 0.5 mile block of parcels zoned for medium density residential use. Roughly half of the land within city limits is zoned for manufacturing or commercial activity, and half for residential purposes.
On the next block above the site is the Paramount Civic Center containing City Hall, the Clearwater Building community building, the Kindred Hospital long-term care hospital, and the “Hay Tree” California Historic Landmark No. 1038. The next block to the north contains a large shopping center. The nearest public school is within the City of Long Beach .25 miles to the south. Less than 0.5 miles to the south is State Route 91, and a little under two miles to the east is the 710 freeway. Transit service is available on Paramount Boulevard via Long Beach Transit route 21 and Metro bus routes 265 and 258, and nearby is Metro route 128. Routes 265 and 258 both connect to the Metro Green Line approximately two miles to the north. The project location is shown in Figure 3.1, Regional Location Map and Figure 3.2, Vicinity Map.
PROJECT COMPONENTS AND OPERATIONS
The project proposes an infill development that would replace three existing buildings with a three-story senior living facility. The ground floor will contain a garage with 67 parking spaces, office and administrative spaces for staff, as well as facilities for public or commercial use/rental including two retail suites, classrooms, a chapel, community center/dining hall with full kitchen, and an outdoor patio. The second floor will contain 28 double-occupancy rooms and seven single-occupancy rooms along with facilities for residents including an outdoor deck, dining hall, living room, library, activity room, gymnasium, physical therapy suite, and administrative offices. The third floor will contain 12 double- Source: ESRI World Street Background Imagery, 2022.
Regional Location Map
FEET
FIGURE
3.1 5000 1,000
PARAMOUNT UMC MIXED-USE PROJECT – ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT IS/MND Project Site
91 91
110
110
105
710
5 405
605
Compton
Downey
Cerritos
Carson
Terminal
Island
Long Beach
Source: Google Maps, 2022.
Harrison St.
Paramount Blvd.
Project Site
Aerial Source: Google Satellite Imagery, Feb. 6, 2020.
Vicinity Map
FEET
FIGURE
3.2 0 150 300
PARAMOUNT UMC MIXED-USE PROJECT – ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT IS/MND Legend
Project Site
Harrison St.
70th St.
E.Thompson St.
Paramount Blvd.
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 7 November 2022
occupancy rooms, six single-occupancy rooms, and seven independent living units, six of which will be income-restricted units, along with two outdoor decks and a lounge for resident use, and an administrative office. The project will provide housing for up to 105 residents in 60 units, with the option for independent living units to house two people each. The building will occupy nearly all of the space on the parcels, with just five-foot setbacks at the front, sides, and a portion of the rear. The building will have a contemporary modern design utilizing materials such as stucco, steel, and plate glass.
During operations the senior assisted living facilities will be classified as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly, licensed and regulated by the California Department of Social Services, Community Care Licensing Division, providing non-medical care and supervision for persons 60 years or older who may need assistance with the activities of daily living.
The public facilities will be administered by the ownership and provided for rental or free of charge at the discretion of facility management. The chapel will host regular services, and classrooms may be used during the day and in the evening. The commercial suites will be available for lease to businesses. Facility staffing will consist of an estimated 20 full time staff for the senior living facility, and the uses on the ground floor are conservatively estimated to employ up to 15 people; 4-10 employees for the commercial suites and 3-5 for the public facilities (chapel, classrooms, and community center) Figure 3.3, First & Second Floor Plans shows the proposed first and second floors, and Figure 3.4, Front Elevation shows the proposed front elevation.
CONSTRUCTION AND EARTHWORK
The infill project would be constructed on a developed, flat property. Construction activities are anticipated to begin in late 2022 with demolition of the site, and the project is expected to be operational by the 4 th
quarter of 2023. The site is expected to be excavated to eight feet and existing soils recompacted for the base, with up to 2,847 cubic yards of dirt exported from the site.
REQUIRED APPROVALS
This IS/MND will serve as the CEQA review document for project implementation, including required City approvals, which would include but may not be limited to of the following:
• General Plan Amendment – from Area Plan to Mixed-Use Commercial Residential • Zone Change – from C-3 to PD-PS
• Lot Merger – Merger of APNs 7102-031-024, 7102-031-020, 7102-031-021 and 7102-031-022 • Development Review
ZT Architecture + Land Development, Mar. 22, 2020.
First & Second Floor Plans
FIGURE
3.3 PARAMOUNT UMC MIXED-USE PROJECT – ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT IS/MND First Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Source: ZT Architecture + Land Development, Mar. 22, 2020.
Front Elevation
FIGURE
3.4 Conceptual Rendering (Front Elevation)
Front Elevation (East)
PARAMOUNT UMC MIXED-USE PROJECT – ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT IS/MND
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 10 November 2022
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT TITLE:
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use
Senior Assisted Living Facility
ENVIRONMENTAL CASE NO:
N/A
RELATED CASES:
DRA 20:015 & ZC 230
PROJECT LOCATION:
16635-16683 Paramount Boulevard, Paramount, CA 90723
EXISTING ZONING:
C-3 / PD-PS
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:
Area Plan / Mixed-Use Commercial Residential
LEAD CITY AGENCY:
City of Paramount
ADDRESS:
16400 Colorado Avenue, Paramount, CA 90723
STAFF CONTACT:
John Carver, Planning Director
TELEPHONE:
(562) 220-2036
APPLICANT NAME AND ADDRESS:
ZT Architecture + Land Development Inc.
5757 W. Century Blvd. Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Attention: Michael Zenon
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project consists of the demolition of existing structures and hardscape on a 1.04 acre (45,500 square-foot) infill development site and construction of an approximately 100,000 gross square-foot, three-story senior living facility, accommodating up to 105 residents within seven independent living units, and 15 single-occupancy and 38 double-occupancy rooms, with a 67-space, approximately 25,500 square-foot parking garage on the ground floor, for a density of 57.7 du/acre. The project will include publicly accessible amenities including two retail suites and a chapel, classrooms, and a dining hall.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The project site is located within an urbanized area on a commercial boulevard surrounded by commercial and residential land uses. The Paramount civic center is directly north, to the west on the opposite side of a public alley abutting the project site is a residential subdivision, which borders large manufacturing areas .25 miles to the west. The street at the south of the site is the southern limit of the City (adjacent to the City of Long Beach). Large residential areas lay to the east of the project site, with the mix of surrounding uses within 0.5 miles of the site roughly 45% manufacturing/commercial and 55% residential.
OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL IS REQUIRED:
N/A
CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION REQUESTED:
Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 11 November 2022
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology /Soils
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population / Housing Public Services Recreation
Transportation/Traffic Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings
of Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.
An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, an EIR Addendum will be prepared.
Name: John Carver
Title: Planning Director
Signature: _____________________
Date:
______________________
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 12 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
I. AESTHETICS.
Except as provided in Public Resources Code
Section 21099, would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
b. Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings, or
other locally recognized desirable aesthetic
natural feature within a state scenic
highway?
c. In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those that
are experienced from publicly accessible
vantage points). If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the project conflict
with applicable zoning and other regulations
governing scenic quality?
d. Create a new source of substantial light or
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Impact Analysis
a. No Impact. A project may have a significant impact if the project introduces incompatible visual elements within a field of view containing a scenic vista or substantially blocks public views of a scenic vista.
Scenic vistas are typically defined as broad sweeping views of a visual resource, such as a cityscape, or a focused view of a scenic element, such as a mountain peak. There are no scenic vistas visible from the project site or Paramount Blvd. adjacent to it. Therefore, the project would have no impact on public views of a scenic vista. The topography of the surrounding area for many miles is generally flat, and the project site is surrounded on all sides by development. This means there are no tall scenic elements to see from the vicinity of the project site, and no broad sweeping views to be had where the project site is within the field of view. Therefore, there would be no impacts on views of a scenic vista.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. No Impact. A significant impact would occur if scenic resources within a city-designated scenic highway would be damaged or removed by development of a project.
The project site is not located along a designated scenic highway or visible from a designated scenic highway, and therefore development of the site will not damage any scenic resources within a scenic highway. The nearest known scenic highway is a portion of the Pacific Coast Highway eligible for state
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 13 November 2022
designation that begins in the City of Long Beach roughly 6.5 miles south of the site. 1 Therefore, the project
would result in no impact to scenic resources within a city-designated scenic highway.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c. Less Than Significant Impact. Projects in urbanized areas could have a significant impact if they conflicted with local regulations governing scenic quality.
The project site is located within the CBD Area Plan area but only the north parcel is subject to the Area Plan’s provisions, and it will have its general plan designation changed to Mixed-Use Commercial Residential as part of the requested entitlement. Architectural guidelines for the CBD were adopted in 1984, however, they are no longer currently in use and are not applicable to the project. There are no designrelated overlay zones or citywide design guidelines applicable to the project, and the new land use designation does not have any specific aesthetic guidelines or standards. The land use element of the general plan has general policy concerned with the aesthetic quality of development that states:
Land Use Element Policy 22. The City of Paramount will continue to promote quality design in the review of residential, commercial and industrial development.
The design of the project isscrutinized at the project level through the Development Review process, guided by the objective standards (height, setback, etc.) applied per the PD-PS zone, which is the current zoning of the two southern parcels and the zoning that the northern parcel will be changed to. Because the design of the project will be guided by City staff, and deemed appropriate through the entitlement process rather than according to set guidelines or standards, approval of the project will be the result, in part, of a design that has been found harmony with the community. Therefore, impacts to applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. No Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project introduces new sources of light or glare that would be incompatible with the surrounding areas, or that pose a safety hazard to motorists on adjacent streets or freeways.
The proposed project has minimal exterior lighting that is commensurate with the use and urban infill location. Therefore, the project does not introduce new sources of lighting that are incompatible with the surrounding area or will pose a safety hazard to motorists and there is no impact.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 1 CalTrans California State Scenic Highway System Map, Accessed January 19, 2021 at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 14 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY
RESOURCES.
Would the project:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of
forest land to non-forest use?
e. Involve other changes in the existing
environment, which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of Farmland,
to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Impact Analysis
a-e. No Impact. The project site is located within an urbanized area of Paramount, which has been developed for decades. The California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) 2018 map of Los Angeles County Important Farmland2 designates the project site and all of its surrounding properties as Urban and Built-Up Land. As such, the project would have no impact on agriculture or forestry resources, and no mitigation is required.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 2 California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Los Angeles County Important Farmland 2016. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2016/los16.pdf (accessed June 17, 2020).
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 15 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
III. AIR QUALITY.
Would the project:
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b. Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard?
c. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d. Result in other emissions (such as those leading
to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people?
Impact Analysis
The proposed project would be located in an urban area in Paramount, situated within the South Coast Air Basin (“Air Basin”). The Air Basin is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west, the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, and San Diego County to the south. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the agency responsible for regulating stationary sources of emissions in the Air Basin.
In addition to being a highly developed metropolitan region with a large population that results in high pollutant emissions, the Air Basin’s prevailing climate often includes light winds, shallow vertical mixing, and extensive sunlight, as well as the adjacent mountain ranges which hinder dispersion of air pollutants, can result in degraded air quality within the Air Basin.
The project’s estimated construction emissions were modeled using the California Emissions estimator Model (CalEEMod.2020.4.0), a statewide land use emissions computer model developed for the California Air Pollution Officers Association in collaboration with the California Air Districts to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with a variety of land use projects. The output reports from CalEEMod are included as included as Appendix A, CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0 Computer Model Output.
a. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant air quality impact could occur if the project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.
In the Air Basin, the agency designated to develop the regional AQMP is the SCAQMD, which coordinates with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The SCAQMD 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is a regional blueprint for achieving federal air quality standards and healthful air, and includes integrated strategies and measures needed to meet the National Ambient Air Quality Standards within the Air Basin, within which the project site is located. The AQMP focuses on achieving clean air standards while accommodating population growth as forecast by SCAG.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 16 November 2022
The project’s proposed 60 senior living units and community and retail components would not generate a substantial increase in regional population or employment growth, and it does not meet the criteria for statewide, regional, or areawide significance as defined in the CEQA Statute and Guidelines Section 15206.
The 2016 AQMP includes the following objectives:
• Eliminate reliance on future technologies measures (to show future attainment of air quality standards) to the maximum extent feasible.
• Calculate and take credit for co-benefits from other planning efforts. • Develop a strategy with fair-share emission reductions at the federal, state, and local levels. • Invest in strategies and technologies meeting multiple objectives regarding air quality, climate change, air toxics exposure, energy, and transportation. • Identify and secure significant funding for incentives to implement early deployment and commercialization of zero and near-zero technologies.
• Enhance the socioeconomic analysis and pursue the most efficient and cost-effective path to achieve multi-pollutant and multi-deadline targets.
• Prioritize enforceable regulatory measures as well as non-regulatory, innovative and “win-win” approaches for emission reductions.
These objectives are not project-specific guidelines, and the project would not interfere with the SCAQMD efforts to achieve these stated objectives. The 2016 AQMP represents a thorough analysis of existing and potential regulatory control options, includes available, proven, and cost-effective strategies, and seeks to achieve multiple goals in partnership with other entities promoting reductions in GHG and toxic risk, as well as efficiencies in energy use, transportation, and goods movement.3
The 2016 overall control strategy is composed of stationary and mobile source emission reductions from traditional regulatory control measures, incentive-based programs, co-benefits from climate programs, mobile source strategies and reductions from federal sources, which include aircraft, locomotives and ocean-going vessels. These strategies are to be implemented in partnership with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
SCAQMD has continued to adopt and implement regulatory measures in order to reduce air pollution emissions from a wide range of sources and to reduce public exposure to unhealthful air pollution. The 2016 AQMP proposes robust reductions for oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from new regulations on Regional Clean Air Incentives Market facilities (e.g., refineries, power plants, etc.), non-refinery flares, commercial cooking, and residential and commercial appliances. Such combustion sources are already heavily regulated with the lowest NOX emissions levels achievable but there are opportunities to require and accelerate replacement with cleaner zero-emission alternatives. The 2016 AQMP strategies also include development of incentive funding to advance deployment of new cleaner technologies at a pace that is not feasible through regulation alone. The project would be required to comply with all regulations regarding appliances and equipment that would be applicable to the proposed uses, including regulations that relate to energy conservation and/or emissions reduction of criteria pollutants.
The project does not meet the criteria for statewide, regional, or areawide significance as defined in the CEQA Statute and Guidelines Section 15206. Further, as discussed in the evaluation below, the project’s construction or operations activities would not result in emissions of criteria pollutants that exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds of significance. Therefore, the project would not substantially affect conformance with the AQMP, nor would it obstruct its implementation; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 3 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan, March 2017.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 17 November 2022
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less Than Significant Impact. A project may have a significant impact if it would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. SCAQMD provides significance thresholds for emissions of criteria pollutants, including: reactive organic gases (ROG), NOX, carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur oxides (SOX), and particulate matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5)4. Projects in the SCAQMD with daily emissions that exceed any of the following emission thresholds shown in Table III1, SCAQMD Daily Maximum Emissions Thresholds, may be considered significant under CEQA guidelines.
Table III-1
SCAQMD Daily Maximum Emissions Thresholds
Pollutant Construction (lbs./day) Operations (lbs./day) ROG 75 55
NOX 100 55
CO 550 550
SOX 150 150
PM-10 150 150
PM-2.5 55 55
Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, Revision April 2019.
The SCAQMD guidance for evaluation of cumulative impacts under CEQA5 states that “As Lead Agency, the AQMD uses the same significance thresholds for project specific and cumulative impacts for all environmental topics analyzed in an Environmental Assessment or EIR” (the Hazard Index (HI) significance threshold for toxic air contaminant emissions is an exception). Further, the SCAQMD guidance states that “Projects that exceed the project-specific significance thresholds are considered by the SCAQMD to be cumulatively considerable. This is the reason project-specific and cumulative significance thresholds are the same. Conversely, projects that do not exceed the project-specific thresholds are generally not considered to be cumulatively significant.” SCAQMD recommends that public agencies perform cumulative impact analyses for air quality in the same manner as SCAQMD. As such, a project that does not exceed the emissions thresholds shown in Table III-1 would not have a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant.
Construction Emissions
The project’s proposed construction activities would include demolition of all existing buildings on site, plus any asphalt or concrete hardscape, which is calculated to be approximately 1,457.2 tons of material.
The entire 1.04 acre site will be prepped and graded, and approximately 2,847 cubic yard of soil may be removed from the site. The building will be an approximately 100,000 gross square-foot, three-story senior living facility with 60 units for a maximum of 105 residents, with an approximately 25,500 square-foot parking garage on the ground floor, and offices, classrooms, community rooms, a chapel, and two retail suites located on the ground floor. Project construction is anticipated to be completed and the building ready to be occupied in 2023.
During construction, emissions of air pollutants would be generated primarily from the use of heavy equipment on-site for construction of the new land uses, including exhaust from internal combustion 4 PM-10 and PM 2.5 refer to particulate matter of less than 10 microns and less than 2.5 microns, respectively. 5 SCAQMD, White Paper on Potential Control Strategies to Address Cumulative Impacts From Air Pollution Appendix D, August 2003.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 18 November 2022
engines and dust from earth moving activities. Dust emissions generated during construction are called "fugitive emissions,” because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source. SCAQMD Rule 403 provides regulatory dust control measures that would apply to the grading related to the project, because of the non-attainment status of the Air Basin for PM-10. The following dust control measures would be implemented during construction as needed to comply with Rule 403 regulations:
• Apply soil stabilizers or moisten inactive areas.
• Prepare a high wind dust control plan.
• Stabilize previously disturbed areas if subsequent construction is delayed. • Water exposed surfaces as needed to avoid visible dust leaving the construction area (typically three times/day).
• Minimize in-out traffic from construction zone.
• Sweep streets daily if visible soil material is carried out from the construction area.
The project’s maximum daily construction emissions as calculated by CalEEMod are shown in Table III2, Construction Activity Maximum Daily Emissions.
Table III-2
Construction Activity Maximum Daily Emissions
Maximum Construction Emissions (lbs/day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2022 2.0 32.6 14.8 0.08 5.7 2.8
2023 57.0 9.3 13.1 0.02 1.0 0.6
Maximum(a) 57.0 32.6 14.8 0.08 5.7 2.8
SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod 2020.4.0. Output sheets provided in Appendix A.
Maximum emissions reported for summer or winter season, whichever is greater. (a) Construction emissions reflect required compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 for applying water during grading to reduce dust.
As shown in Table III-2, peak daily construction activity emissions of criteria air pollutants are estimated to be below the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Therefore, the project’s potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant during construction would be less than significant.
Although the project’s fugitive dust emissions would be below SCAQMD thresholds during construction prior to implementation of SCAQMD Rule 403 - Fugitive Dust (see CalEEMod Output sheets in Appendix A), the project would be required to implement appropriate dust control measures during construction in compliance the Rule, which requires that all unpaved demolition and construction areas be wetted at least twice daily during excavation and construction, and that temporary dust covers would be used to reduce dust emissions.
Operational Emissions
Primary inputs used by CalEEMod for emissions modeling are the amount of debris to be demolished to make way for construction, the total grading area of the project, proposed uses, and the size of structures or paved areas to be built for those uses. The uses are based upon classifications found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. CalEEMod uses ITE trip generation data to
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 19 November 2022
calculate mobile emissions for the various uses, and uses its own proprietary models to calculate the emissions and energy consumption for the construction and operation of those uses.
CalEEMod does not have a suite of uses that precisely fit the proposed project, so the building has been broken into three components to create a conservative model. The proposed senior living facility has been identified in the model run as 65 units of Assisted Care use occupying 1.04 acres, in a 68,820 square-foot building, which would include all of the senior living facility plus the parking.6 The retail suites are input as a Convenience Market (24 hour) use. This use was chosen because it is a relatively high energy use and generated trips should produce a high (conservative) estimate that would cover any potential future uses that might reasonably be expected to occupy the suites. The rest of the ground-floor publicly-accessible uses have been identified in the model run as General Office Building. The classrooms, community room, and chapel will likely not be occupied or used on a daily basis, but may experience more intense use on weekends (the chapel), or seasonally (the community room), so it would be difficult to predict the intensity of use of all of them combined. General Office Building is a use that is in operation every weekday but is mainly used by the people that work in that location (i.e., there is no customer traffic). This consistent and constant use was chosen to produce a conservative estimate of air emissions from the use of the chapel, classrooms, and community room would look like averaged out over time.
The project would generate emissions of criteria pollutants during the operations period, which would primarily be associated with mobile (vehicle) sources. The project’s maximum daily emissions of criteria pollutants during operations, using the conservative assumptions noted above, are shown in Table III-3, Daily Operational Emissions.
Table III-3
Daily Operational Emissions
Source Operational Emissions (lbs/day)
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Area 1.97 0.06 5.37 >0.01 0.03 0.03
Energy 0.03 0.25 0.12 >0.01 0.02 0.02
Mobile 8.48 6.58 57.36 0.09 9.42 2.56
Total 10.48 6.89 62.84 0.09 9.47 2.61
AQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod 2020.4.0. Output sheets provided in Appendix A. Totals may not add due to rounding.
Maximum emissions reported for summer or winter season, whichever is greater.
Totals may appear not to sum due to rounding.
As shown in Table III-3, the project’s operational emissions would be far below the SCAQMD maximum daily emission thresholds for criteria pollutants. Therefore, the project’s potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant during operations would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project would generate emissions that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Sensitive receptors are populations that are generally more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the population at large. Land uses considered to be sensitive receptors include residences, long-term care facilities, schools, 6 The model was based on a previous iteration of the project which had 65 units but was otherwise the same as the proposed.
Consequently, operational emission and GHG projections are conservative.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 20 November 2022
playgrounds, parks, hospitals, and outdoor athletic facilities. The closest sensitive receptors that could potentially be subject to localized air quality impacts associated with construction of the project would be residences that are located west of the project site.
Local Significance Thresholds Impacts
The SCAQMD developed analysis parameters to evaluate ambient air quality on a local level in addition to the more regional emissions-based thresholds of significance. These analysis elements are called Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). LSTs are only applicable to the following criteria pollutants: NOX, CO, PM-10, and PM-2.5. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and they are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor.
Pursuant to SCAQMD LST Methodology for projects with boundaries located closer than 25 meters to the nearest receptor, LST screening levels for a 25-meter source-receptor distance were utilized for the project.7 LST pollutant screening level concentration data is currently published for one, two and five-acre sites. For the project, thresholds for a one-acre site were used. This evaluation is based on the estimated on-site daily construction emissions for the phase and year representing the highest daily emissions. Daily averages would be lower than the reported maximum amounts.
Table III-4, LST - Maximum On-site Construction Emissions, shows the relevant thresholds and the estimated peak daily on-site emissions during the construction phases that would generate the highest level of on-site emissions for each pollutant evaluated for LST impacts. The emissions shown in Table III-4 include the application of water to exposed soils twice daily for dust suppression as required for compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, Fugitive Dust.
Table III-4
LST - Maximum On-site Construction Emissions
LST 1 acre/25 meters
South Coastal L.A. County (SRA No. 4)
Project LST Emissions (pounds/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Maximum On-Site Emissions(a) 16.98 13.96 3.96 2.23
LST Threshold 57 585 4 3
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Source: CalEEMod 2020.4.0. Output sheets provided in Appendix A. Totals may not add due to rounding.
Maximum emissions reported for any construction phase in summer or winter season, whichever is greater. (a) Construction emissions reflect required compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 for applying water during grading to reduce dust.
As seen in Table III-4, the peak on-site emissions during construction would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs, and as such, the project’s potential to generate emissions that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project would result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. In the urban environment, substantial odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving the use of 7 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Revised July 2008, Accessed at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-lstmethodology-document.pdf?sfvrsn=2 on September 20, 2021.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 21 November 2022
chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling materials used in manufacturing processes, as well as some sewage treatment facilities and landfills. As the proposed use will not be industrial in nature and will not involve activities that require strong-smelling materials, no significant odors would be produced during operations.
During the construction phase, activities associated with the application of architectural coatings and other interior and exterior finishes, paving, or other construction activities may produce discernible odors typical of most construction sites. Such odors would be temporary, and of limited duration during construction.
Additionally, SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities) requires a survey for asbestos prior to demolition of the structures to ensure asbestos is not released into the air during construction. As such, the project’s potential to emit objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 22 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat modification, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations by the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in the City or regional plans, policies,
regulations by the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
Through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use
of native wildlife nursery sites?
e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional or state habitat conservation plan?
Impact Analysis
a. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A significant impact could occur if a project would result in a substantial adverse effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special-status species in local or regional plans.
The City and the areas surrounding it have been fully developed (effectively every parcel built upon or in use) for several decades. There are no substantial natural areas within five miles of the project site, and no large parks within a mile radius. The L.A. River borders the 710 Freeway 1.5 miles to the west, but is a concrete lined channel for four miles or more in each direction. The project site is nearly completely covered by structures or concrete, with only a landscaping strip adjacent to Paramount Blvd containing vegetation.
The landscaping in the church complex was most recently maintained and consists of mulched planting beds, groundcover plants, and small shrubs and perennials, with one strip of turf and one shrub close to the
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 23 November 2022
parking lot. Landscaping in front of the bar and auto repair garage is weedy with some small shrubbery.
The landscaping plants used are exotic species that until recently were regularly maintained by mowing, clipping, etc., and there is no suitable habitat on the site for wildlife. A search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Biodiversity Database for the South Gate quadrangle reveals historic occurrences of special-status species within the quadrangle, but there have been no recordings of any species since 1956. A mature Ficus street tree adjacent to the church will be removed as part of the project and ten new street trees planted. Because there are no heavily vegetated areas near the project site, and the surrounding area is fully developed and exclusively urban in character, is highly unlikely any native or migratory bird species would choose the Ficus tree for nesting. However, migratory or other common nesting birds that are not special-status species are protected by the California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) and Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Therefore, out of an abundance of caution to ensure no nesting birds protected under the CFGC or MBTA are harmed, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 will be implemented.
This will ensure compliance with the CFGC Section 3503 and the MBTA with respect to nesting birds by reducing the impact through pre-construction nesting bird surveys and avoidance of active nests.
Given the urban context of the site which provides no suitable habitat for special status species, plus the incorporation of mitigation for nesting birds, impacts to special-status species or nesting birds would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures:
MM BIO-1: Nesting Birds
• Removal of the mature street tree, or demolition of the subject property, should take place outside of the nesting bird season, which generally runs from March 1- August 31 (as early as February 1 for raptors) to avoid take (including disturbances which would cause abandonment of active nests containing eggs and/or young). Take means to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture or kill (Fish and Game Code Section 86). • If project activities cannot feasibly avoid the nesting bird season, beginning thirty days prior to the disturbance of the street tree, the applicant shall:
1. Arrange for weekly bird surveys to detect any protected native birds in the tree to be removed. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist with experience in conducting nesting bird surveys. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis with the last survey being conducted no more than three days prior to the initiation of clearance/construction work.
2. If a nesting bird is found, the applicant shall delay all clearance/construction disturbance activities within 300 feet of suitable nesting habitat for the observed protected bird species (within 500 feet for suitable raptor nesting habitat) until August 31.
3. Alternatively, the Qualified Biologist could continue the surveys in order to locate any nests. If an active nest is located, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest (within 500 feet for raptor nests), or as determined by the Qualified Biological Monitor, shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of the area.
4. The Qualified Biologist shall record the results of the recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable state and federal laws pertaining to the protection of nesting birds. Such record shall be submitted and received into the case file for the associated discretionary action permitting the project
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 24 November 2022
b. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in the City or regional plans, policies, regulations by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
The project site is in an urban area that has been fully developed for decades. There are no natural habitat communities on or near the site. Therefore, the project would have no impact on sensitive natural communities.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project has a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands or waters of the United States.
The project site is in an urban area that has been fully developed for decades and there are no wetlands or waters of the United States on or near the project site. The Los Angeles River is a protected watershed, but is 1.5 miles from the project site and is a concrete lined channel for the entire span adjacent to the City and the project will not have any substantial adverse effect upon it. As such there would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites.
A wildlife corridor contains physical connections that allow wildlife to move between areas of suitable habitat in both undisturbed landscapes and landscapes fragmented by urban development. The site is not near nor connected to any wildlife habitat area and itself does not provide any habitat for wildlife. The site is also not part of a regional-scale habitat linkage or a wildlife movement corridor.8 Therefore, there would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. e. No Impact. A significant adverse effect could occur if a project were to cause an impact that is inconsistent with local regulations pertaining to biological resources, such as a protected tree ordinance.
The City does not have a protected tree ordinance, or any other similar regulations pertaining to biological resources. There are no trees on the property, and vegetation that is present is typical for urban landscaping.
Therefore, the project would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. f. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would be inconsistent with mapping or policies in any conservation plans of the types cited.
8 County of Los Angeles, Department of Regional Planning, General Plan 2035, Figure 9.2, Regional Habitat Linkages, Adopted October 6, 2015.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 25 November 2022
The project site is not part of any draft or adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan. Thus, there would be no impact.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 26 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES.
Would the project:
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in
significance of a historical resource pursuant in
CEQA Section 15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to CEQA Section 15064.5?
c. Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Impact Analysis
On June 22, 2022, Envicom Corporation completed a Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Project Site to identify any known cultural resources previously recorded within or immediately adjacent to the proposed project site. The study included a cultural resource record search conducted by the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), a request for the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) to conduct a record search for Native American cultural resources, and a request for the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County to conduct a record search for paleontological resources, as well as a pedestrian survey of the site. These record searches examined the project site plus a 0.25-mile area (“study area”) around the project Site, to assess the overall cultural resource sensitivity of the project region.
Additional databases that were examined during the Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment included historic regional maps, historic United States Geological Survey maps, and historic Google Earth images. The Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment is provided in Appendix B. The record search findings obtained at the SCCIC were negative for cultural resources within the project property and found one non-archaeological cultural resource within the 0.25-mile surrounding study area. The cultural resource listed (P-19-186997) was originally the “Paramount Hay Tree” located at 16475 Paramount Blvd, which is roughly a block north of the north of the project site. The tree is nonextant and commemorated with a plaque at the site. It will not be affected by the project. The church, auto repair building, and bar are all over 50 years old and therefore must be evaluated as potential historic resources. The auto repair building and bar were previously evaluated in the 2020 IS/MND and it was determined there would be no impacts to historical resources.
The Phase I assessment evaluated the church and determined the church would not constitute a significant historic resource.
a. Less Than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant impact if it would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in CEQA Section 15064.5.
Section 15064.5 of the Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, “Determining the Significance of Impacts to Archaeological and Historical Resources,” details the circumstances in which the significance of an historical resource is materially impaired. This primarily entails material alterations to the physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and thereby justifies its eligibility for designation, or accounts for its designation as historic. Section 15064.5 also defines what constitutes a historic resource for the purposes of CEQA review. This includes properties already listed at the local, State, or Federal level, any properties that meet the criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources, which are adapted from the National Register of Historic Places criteria, or any property otherwise determined by the lead agency to be eligible for listing as a designated historic resource.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 27 November 2022
As mentioned above the auto repair building and bar were evaluated in the 2020 ISMND and the lead agency determined demolition of the structures would not impact historical resources. The church is over 50 years old as well and therefore requires evaluation as a potential historic resource. The City currently has no historic preservation ordinance and thus there is no local criteria to evaluate. The criteria of the California Register of Historical Resources is as follows:
1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage;
2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;
3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or
4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
The Phase I evaluation of the church determined that the property does not meet any of these criteria. The church is constructed in the mid-century modern style, but is of an average design and not a noteworthy representative of the style. There is no evidence the church is associated with significant events or important persons, the architect is not considered an important creative individual, and preservation of the church structure would not yield important information. As none of the existing structures have been found eligible for designation, demolition would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A significant impact could occur if a known or unknown archaeological resource would be removed, altered, or destroyed as a result of the proposed development.
The Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the project site included a search of SCCIC records to provide an inventory of all previously recorded archaeological and historic archaeological resources, as well as previously conducted archaeological investigations or studies, within the project site plus a 0.25-mile radius. The record search findings obtained at the SCCIC were negative for cultural resources within the site or the buffer ,save for the former Hay Tree discussed previously. The assessment also requested NAHC review of the Sacred Lands File to determine if any recorded Tribal Cultural Places or other sites of cultural importance were located within the project site or study area, which returned a negative result. The property is located in an area that experienced development in the late 1800s and early 1900s, including properties east of the site appearing as early as 1896. According to the Phase I, the late 1800s, early 1900s development is considered a time period of importance for Southern California archaeology as it pre-dates the postWorld War II expansion of development in the state.
As the site and its nearby surroundings experienced successive development beginning in the late 1800s, there is the potential for older historical cultural resources (archeological resources) being located within the project development site. As such, there is the potential for impacts to archaeological resources. To reduce these impacts to a less than significant level, Mitigation Measure CR-1 will be employed. The measure requires that if previously unknown archaeological resources are found during excavation, the project would follow procedures detailed in California Public Resources Code Section (PRC) 21083.2, and ensure that any found deposits would be treated in accordance with federal, state, and local guidelines.
Mitigation Measures:
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 28 November 2022
MM CR-1: Archaeological Monitoring
• An archaeological monitor that meets the Secretary of Interior qualifications will be on site during grading of the project site from surface to the end of subsurface excavation. The purpose of having an archaeologist on site is to assess if any significant cultural resources are encountered during grading or trenching. If such features or artifact concentrations are identified, then the project “discovery” protocol will be followed:
1. The archaeological monitor will collect any diagnostic older historical material uncovered through grading that is within a disturbed context, and can halt construction within 30-feet of a potentially significant cultural resource if necessary. Artifacts collected from a disturbed context or that do not warrant additional assessment can be collected without the need to halt grading. Discovery situations that do not lead to further assessment, survey, evaluation, or data recovery can be described in the monitor’s daily logs. However, if foundations, privies, or other older historical features are encountered, the project “discovery” protocol should be followed. A final Monitoring Report will be produced for the project that discusses all monitoring activities and all artifacts recovered and features identified through monitoring of the project site. Discovery situations that do not lead to further assessment, survey, evaluation, or data recovery can be described in the final Monitoring Report.
2. All artifacts recovered that are important, with diagnostic or location information that may be of importance to California history, will be cleaned, analyzed, and described within the Monitoring Report. All materials determined important will be curated at an appropriate depository or returned to the landowner for public display. If important materials are found during monitoring, a Curation Plan may be needed that is reviewed by the Lead Agency prior to the publication of the Monitoring Report. The costs of the Monitoring Report, the Curation Plan, and the processing, analysis, and curation of all artifacts will be the responsibility of the applicant, within the cost parameters outlined under CEQA. c. Less Than Significant Impact. A project-related significant adverse effect could occur if grading or excavation activities associated with a project would disturb previously interred human remains. No known human burials have been identified on the project site or its vicinity, and as explained above, excavation of the site is unlikely to involve significant amounts of native soil. If human remains are encountered unexpectedly during demolition, grading, and/or construction activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 addresses such a scenario.
This code section states that in the event human remains are uncovered, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination as to the origin and disposition of the remains pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The Coroner must be notified of the find immediately, together with the City and the property owner.
If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the NAHC, which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials and an appropriate re-internment site.
The Lead/Permitting Agency and a qualified archaeologist shall also establish additional appropriate mitigation measures for further site construction.
Adherence to these requirements will ensure potential impacts related to the disturbance of unknown human remains would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 29 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
VI. ENERGY.
Would the project:
a. Result in potentially significant environmental
impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or
unnecessary consumption of energy resources,
during project construction or operation?
b. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Impact Analysis
The following analysis is based on the Air Quality and GHG Impact Analysis and emissions estimates calculated using CalEEMod, prepared by Envicom Corporation, dated June 2022, (Appendix A), and the calculations included in the Construction Fuel Consumption Worksheet, provided in Appendix C. a. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation.
Construction
During construction, the project would use heavy-duty equipment associated with demolition, site preparation, grading, paving, architectural coating and building. Construction equipment used on the site would include graders, dozers, air compressors, cement and mortar mixers, forklifts, generators, welders, rollers, pavers, and tractors equipped with front end loaders and backhoes. Construction also involves trucks for material and supplies delivery, as well as powered hand tools, including concrete saws. The majority of the equipment would likely be diesel-fueled. However, smaller equipment such as welders and pumps may be electric-, gasoline-, or natural gas-fueled.
The CCR requires drivers of diesel-fueled commercial motor vehicles with gross vehicle weight ratings greater than 10,000 pounds not to idle the vehicle’s primary diesel engine longer than five minutes at any location.9 Compliance with this regulation would also result in efficient use of construction-related energy and prevent unnecessary consumption of energy from diesel fuel.
According to carbon dioxide (CO2) emission factors for transportation fuels published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration,10 burning one gallon of diesel fuel generates approximately 22.4 pounds of CO2 and burning one gallon of petroleum-based gasoline produces approximately 19.6 pounds of CO2.
Based on these emissions factors and the project’s total construction-related CO2 emissions, project consumption of diesel and petroleum-based gasoline during construction was calculated and is shown in Table VI-1, Total Fuel Consumption During Project Construction. The calculations are shown in a Construction Fuel Consumption Worksheet provided in Appendix C. 9 California Code of Regulations, Section 2485, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling. 10 U.S. Energy Information Administration, Environment Carbon Dioxide Emissions Coefficients, February 2, 2016.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 30 November 2022
Table VI-1
Total Fuel Consumption During Project Construction
Energy Type Total MT CO2 Total CO2 pounds a CO2 emission factors Total Gallons Consumed Total Diesel 200.8 442,594 22.4 19,759
Total Gasoline 45.0 99,171 19.6 5,060
Source: CalEEMod 2020.4.0, Construction Fuel Consumption Worksheet, Appendix C. a 1 MT = 2,204.62 lbs. (approx.) As shown in Table VI-1, based on the U.S. Energy Information Administration fuel consumption factors, and the project’s estimated “total CO2” emissions presented in the CalEEMod output sheets, it is estimated that the project’s construction activities would consume a total of approximately 19,759 gallons of diesel fuel and approximately 5,060 gallons of gasoline. In 2019 an estimated 15.4 billion gallons of gasoline were sold in California (retail sales).11 In 2015 approximately 4.2 billion gallons of diesel fuel (including offroad diesel) were sold.12 As such, the use of construction equipment, transportation of materials, and workers necessary for project construction would not represent a substantial proportion of annual gasoline or diesel fuel use in California.
Adherence to CCR Section 2485 and CARB anti-idling regulations for off-road diesel-fueled fleets would reduce the potential for wasteful use of energy by construction equipment. Due to the temporary duration of construction and the necessity of fuel consumption inherent in construction projects, fuel consumption would not be excessive or substantial with respect to fuel supplies. The energy demands associated with fuel consumption during construction would be typical of projects of this size and would not necessitate additional energy facilities or distribution infrastructure or cause wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy. Therefore, the project’s potential to result in environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during construction would be less than significant.
Operations – Electricity
The project would generate additional demand for electricity from the Southern California Edison (SCE).
As estimated by CalEEMod, the project’s total electricity demand would be approximately 437,042.5 kilowatt hours per year (kWh/year) or 437 megawatt hours per year (MWh/year). The SCE supplies more than more than 87 million MWh/year of electricity to customers.13 The project would represent approximately 0.0005 percent of the yearly electricity demand, which is negligible in relation to the entire electricity demand of the SCE service area. Therefore, the project would not result in substantial increase in electricity demand.
In addition, the project would be required to comply with the applicable portions of the California Energy Code and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code), which establish planning and design standards for sustainable development, energy efficiency, water conservation, and material conservation. By required compliance with applicable regulations and continued energy efficient programs implemented by SCE, the project’s potential impacts regarding wasteful or inefficient use of electricity energy supplies would be less than significant.
11 California Energy Commission, 2020 California Annual Retail Fuel Outlet Report Results (CEC-A15) Energy Assessments Division, 08-31-20. 12 California Energy Commission, Diesel Fuel Data, Facts, and Statistics, Accessed May 9, 2022 at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/transportation-energy/diesel-fuel-data-facts-and-statistics. 13 Southern California Edison, About Us, Who We Are, Accessed on May 9, 2022 at: https://www.sce.com/about-us/who-we-are.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 31 November 2022
Operations - Natural Gas
The project would generate additional demand for natural gas from the Southern California Gas Company, though actual employment of natural gas appliances and facilities may be less than predicted by the CalEEMod model. Total project demand for natural gas would be approximately 969,765.8 thousand British thermal units per year (kBTU/year) as estimated by CalEEMod output data. According to the California Energy Commission, the County consumed 2,936.68 million therms or 2,936,687,098 kBTU/year of natural gas in 2020.
14 The project would represent approximately 0.03 percent of the natural gas consumption in the County in 2020, a negligible amount relative to Countywide consumption.
In addition, the project is required to comply with applicable portions of the California Energy Code and CALGreen Code, which establish planning and design standards for sustainable development, energy efficiency, water conservation, and material conservation. By required compliance with applicable regulations, the project’s potential to result in impacts regarding wasteful or inefficient use of natural gas energy supplies would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.
The City would review project site plans to verify compliance with the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards in the California Energy Code prior to issuing a building permit. As a regulatory requirement, prior to permitting, the project plans would be reviewed by the City’s Building and Safety Division for consistency with applicable state and local standards for renewable energy and efficiency, including CALGreen Code Title 24 standards. These codes mandate the incorporation of energy and water efficiency features in building design as well as energy and water efficient fixtures, appliances, lighting, and heating and air conditioning. The project facilities will also be inspected by the City during construction and prior to occupancy to ensure appropriate standards are met. Through regulatory compliance with state and local energy efficiency code requirements, the project’s potential to conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 14 California Energy Commission, Gas Consumption by County, Los Angeles Total 2020.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 32 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.
Would the project:
a. Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury
or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in onor off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater?
f. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geological features?
Impact Analysis
The following section incorporates information for the project site provided by the Geotechnical Investigation, dated April 13, 2022, and prepared by Geotechnical Professionals, Inc., which is included as Appendix D, as well as the paleontological information contained in the project’s Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment, prepared by Envicom Corporation, dated June 22, 2022, and included as Appendix B. The Geotechnical Investigation specifically studies the large northern parcel of the project site, however, the recommendations of the Investigation are appropriate for the other two parcels, and the
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 33 November 2022
general conditions concerning earthquake hazards apply to the whole of the site. The two southern parcels were also separately assessed in 2020 and no potentially significant impacts were found.15 a. i. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project site is located within a state-designated Alquist-Priolo Zone or other designated fault zone.
According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the project site is not located within a state-designated AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zone, and no active or potentially active faults are known to exist within the site.
Therefore, ground rupture due to faulting is considered unlikely. The nearest fault is the Puente Hills fault (Santa Fe Springs segment) approximately 2.1 miles northeast of the site. The proximity of this fault may result in ground shaking at the premises but would not result in rupture at the project site. Therefore, impacts related to potential fault rupture are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. a. ii. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project represents an increased risk to public safety or destruction of property by exposing people, property, or infrastructure to seismically induced ground shaking hazards.
The Geotechnical Investigation explains that the site will likely be subject to strong ground shaking in the future, which is a very common hazard in Southern California. The Investigation classifies the site as Seismic Design Category Class D, based on the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) and ASCE/SEI 7- 1616 and thus the project will be subject to the applicable structural regulations in the CBC that address that classification. Seismic Design Categories range from A to F, and the requirements for foundation and structural design will change according to the class in order to compensate for less or more anticipated ground-shaking. The Investigation explains that the project site will require remediation or replacement of undocumented fill soils present on site but will be able to employ standard mat or spread foundations to achieve structural stability. Because it has been determined that conformance with current building codes and engineering practices- including the specific requirements for Class D properties that address groundshaking hazards- will ensure structural stability, potential impacts from ground shaking are less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. a. iii. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction.
Liquefaction is a process by which sediments below the water table temporarily lose strength and behave as a viscous liquid rather than a solid. The types of sediments most susceptible are clay-free deposits of sand and silts, although liquefaction may occasionally occur in gravel deposits. Liquefaction can occur when seismic waves, primarily shear waves, pass through saturated granular layers and distort the granular structure, causing loosely packed groups of particles to collapse. These collapses increase the pore-water pressure between grains if drainage cannot occur. If the pore-water pressure rises to a level approaching the weight of the overlying soil, the granular layer temporarily behaves as a viscous liquid rather than a solid. 15 City of Paramount, Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Paramount Senior Living 16675 & 16683 Paramount Boulevard, dated December 8, 2020. 16 American Society of Civil Engineers, SEI 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures are standards using performance-based principles to determine dead, live, soil, flood, tsunami, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, earthquake, and wind loads, and their combinations for general structural design.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 34 November 2022
The site is located within a Seismic Hazard Zone for soil liquefaction. Because the project site is susceptible to liquefaction, a liquefaction analysis was performed for the project using 8 feet as a below ground surface (bgs) depth to groundwater, a magnitude 6.9 earthquake, and peak ground acceleration (PGAM) of 0.76g.
The results indicate that potential total seismic-induced settlement is estimated to be 2 to 3 inches. The Geotechnical Investigation provides recommendations for structural design to address this potential impact.
Namely, undocumented fill on the site must be removed, or potentially remediated, and the upper portions of the native soils must be over-excavated and recompacted. The Investigation concludes that such soil preparation will allow the use of a mat foundation, and alternatively isolated and continuous spread foundations may be used with densification of the first 30 feet of soils. These recommendations are CBC standards reiterated by the Geotechnical Investigation. Therefore, with regulatory compliance to CBC requirements, substantial adverse effects related to liquefaction will be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. a. iv. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including landslides.
Landslides are a mass wasting phenomenon in mountainous and hillside areas that include a wide range of movements and occur when the stability of the slopes change to an unstable condition resulting from a number of factors including physical and/or chemical weathering of earth materials, unfavorable geologic structures relative to the slope geometry, erosion at the toe of a slope, and precipitation. The project site is a flat infill property with little topographical variation on the site and in the surrounding vicinity, which precludes the potential for landslides and/or other hazards associated with hillside properties. In addition, the site is not located within an earthquake-induced landslide hazard zone on the California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application.
17 There are no known landslides near the site, nor is the site in the path of any known or potential landslides. Therefore, the project would have no impact related to landslides.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project would result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
Although the project site is relatively flat, development of the project has the potential to result in the erosion of exposed soils during site preparation and construction activities. However, the City of Paramount is a party to the Los Angeles County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements (Order No. R4-2012-0175), issued by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in accordance with the County’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, CAS004001. These requirements regulate stormwater and non-stormwater discharges, and constitute the water quality standards and discharge requirements the project is subject to during construction and after.
Compliance with MS4 permit requirements includes demonstrating implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) sufficient to minimize erosion and discharge of soil during construction activities, per Chapter 8.20 of the Paramount Municipal Code. These requirements are a matter of regulatory compliance, and on a flat site such as the project site will be more than adequate to reduce potential on-site erosion to less than significant levels. Therefore, the potential for the project to substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the area resulting in substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation would be less than significant. 17 CA Department of Conservation, California Earthquake Hazards Zone Application, accessed April 18, 2022 at https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 35 November 2022
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project is located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of a project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse.
Lateral spreading is a term referring to landslides that form on gentle slopes and have a fluid-like flow movement. As discussed above, the project is located in a flat area, remote from steep slopes, and is not identified as an area susceptible to potential landslides. With replacement of fill and foundations designed to address the site’s liquefaction potential, the site has been determined suitable for development, this includes the potential risk related to lateral spreads which should be less than significant with adherence to building standards. Risks related to liquefaction have already been discussed and are less than significant.
Subsidence occurs when a large portion of land is displaced vertically, usually due to the withdrawal of groundwater, oil, or natural gas. Soils that are particularly subject to subsidence include those with high silt or clay content. The site is not located within an area of known ground subsidence, and the Geotechnical Investigation has determined total potential ground settlement of 2 to 3 inches. No large-scale extraction of groundwater, gas, oil, or geothermal energy is occurring or planned at the site or in the general Site vicinity.
As there is little or no potential for ground subsidence due to withdrawal of fluids or gases at the site, therefore subsidence impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project is built on expansive soils as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property.
Expansive soils contain significant amounts of clay particles that swell considerably when wetted and shrink when dried. Foundations constructed on these soils are subject to uplifting forces caused by the swelling. Based on the Geotechnical Investigation, expansion potential on the site is very low on a scale of very low to very high using the ASTM D-4829 test18. Results of such a test determine what kind of foundation requirements are necessary. The Investigation determines the requirements for replacement or remediation of fill for the chosen foundation system will suffice to reduce potential impacts associated with expansive soils to less than significant levels.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. e. No Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project site’s soils are incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater.
The project site is located in a developed area of the City, which is served by an existing municipal wastewater collection, conveyance, and treatment system. No septic tanks or alternative disposal systems would be necessary, nor are they proposed. Therefore, no impact would occur.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 18 ASTM International, FKA American Society for Testing and Materials.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 36 November 2022
f. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A significant impact could occur if a project would directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological features.
Paleontological resources are the fossilized remains of organisms that have lived in the region in the geologic past and the accompanying geologic strata. As discussed in the project’s Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment (Appendix B), the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County considers the entire project area to be of concern for sensitive fossil resources and recommends paleontological monitoring on any project with excavation. However, the Phase I determines that because excavation is unlikely to be deeper than 10-feet in depth and would remain within undocumented fill or recent alluvium material, there is a low likelihood any fossil resources will be encountered and therefore no need for paleontological monitoring.
Because there is still a chance, however unlikely, fossils could be encountered during excavation, Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (Paleontological Resources) will be employed to ensure that if any such resources are encountered during construction of the project, they would be handled according to the proper regulations and any potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant.
Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Measure GEO-1 (Paleontological Resources)
If any paleontological materials are encountered during the course of project development, all further development activities within 30-feet of the discovery shall halt until a qualified senior paleontologist can evaluate the nature and/or significance of the find(s). If the senior paleontologist determines that the discovery is potentially significant, then the Lead Agency will be contacted and informed of the discovery.
Construction will not resume in the locality of the discovery until consultation between the senior paleontologist, the owner’s project manager, or the Lead Agency takes place and reaches a conclusion approved by the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency may also require the site to be monitored during the rest of the project excavation.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 37 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would
the project:
a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases?
Impact Analysis
GHGs emitted by human activity are implicated in global climate change. These GHGs contribute to an increase in the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere by preventing long wavelength heat radiation in some parts of the infrared spectrum from leaving the atmosphere. According to California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, in California, as in the rest of the world, climate change is contributing to an escalation of serious problems, including raging wildfires, coastal erosion, disruption of water supply, threats to agriculture, spread of insect-borne diseases, and continuing health threats from air pollution. For purposes of planning and regulation, Section 15364.5 of the CCR defines GHGs as including CO2, CO, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. The primary GHG emitted in California is CO2, which accounted for 84 percent of total GHG emissions in 2015. Because the warming potential of the identified GHGs differ, GHG emissions are typically expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents (CO2e), providing a common expression for the combined volume and warming potential of the GHGs generated by a particular emitter. The total GHG emissions from individual sources are generally reported in metric tons (MT) and are expressed as MT of CO2 (MTCO2e).
Fossil fuel combustion in the transportation sector (on-road motor vehicles, off-highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately half of GHG emissions globally. The transportation sector, primarily on-road travel, is the single largest source of CO2 emissions in California. Additionally, about 50 percent of the industrial source emissions of CO2 are from the refinery and oil and gas sectors. When the industrial source emissions from the oil and gas sectors are attributed to the transportation sector, the emissions associated with transportation amount to approximately half of statewide GHG emissions.
The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill, or AB, 32) required that CARB determine the statewide 1990 GHG emission level and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit, equal to the 1990 level, to be achieved by 2020. As reported in the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, California was on track to exceed its 2020 GHG reduction target. Executive Order B-30-15 and SB 32 extended the goals of AB 32 and set a 2030 goal of reducing emissions by 40 percent from 2020 levels.
The project’s estimated emissions of GHGs during construction and operations were calculated using CalEEMod, which is discussed in Section III, Air Quality. The CalEEMod output sheets are included in Appendix A.
a. Less Than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant impact if would generate GHGs, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 38 November 2022
In determining the significance of impacts from GHG emissions, Section 15064.4 of CEQA specifies that a lead agency has the discretion to determine whether to quantify project-related GHG emissions or to rely on a qualitative analysis or performance-based standards. Section 15064.4 also states that a lead agency should consider the extent to which a project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines also clarify that the effects of GHG emissions are cumulative and should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s requirements for cumulative impacts analysis.
The California Supreme Court’s decision in the Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (62 Cal.4th 204), also known as the Newhall Ranch Case, reviewed the methodology used to analyze GHG emissions in CEQA. The Supreme Court suggested that a lead agency might assess consistency with AB 32’s goal in whole or in part by looking to compliance with regulatory programs designed to reduce GHG emissions from particular activities as one pathway to determining the significance of a project’s GHG emissions. This approach is consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064, which provides that a determination that an impact is not cumulatively considerable may rely on compliance with previously adopted plans or regulationsfor the reduction of GHG emissions. The Court also suggested other pathways to compliance, including relying on existing numerical thresholds of significance for GHG emissions (if supported by substantial evidence).
In October 2008, SCAQMD staff proposed the use of a numerical threshold of 3,000 Metric tons (MT) of CO2e per year for evaluating GHG impacts of commercial/residential projects, based on meeting the AB 32 emission reduction target. However, SCAQMD has not formally adopted a GHG significance threshold for land use development projects.
Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4(a), this evaluation quantifies GHG emissions resulting from the project. However, in the absence of an adopted numerical threshold by the City, state, or SCAQMD, this analysis relies on a combination of the quantification of GHG emissions as estimated for the project using CalEEMod and an evaluation of the project’s consistency with relevant local GHG reduction plans to evaluate the project’s GHG impacts.
Construction Impacts
During construction, the project would temporarily generate GHG emissions from use of construction equipment, and various construction materials (paint, asphalt, etc.) would also result in the short-term generation of GHG emissions. The project’s construction-related GHG emissions were modeled using CalEEMod as discussed in Section III. As shown in the CalEEMod output for the project, construction activities would generate a total of 260.38 MTCO2e emissions. The SCAQMD’s GHG emissions evaluation guidance is to amortize construction emissions over a 30-year lifetime, which results in a project amortized annual emissions of approximately 8.7 MTCO2e emissions.
Operations Impacts
Operation of the proposed project would result in GHG emissions from mobile sources, on-site use of natural gas and landscaping equipment, and off-site sources, such as electricity generation, water distribution and treatment, disposal of solid waste, and treatment of wastewater. The operational generation of GHG emissions were calculated using CalEEMod, as recommended by the SCAQMD, and shown in Table VIII-1, Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions. As noted in Section III, CalEEMod was run using conservative land use assumptions, so actual GHG emissions would likely be lower.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 39 November 2022
Table VIII-1
Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Consumption Source MTCO2e/year
Area Sources 3.6
Energy Utilization 130.0
Mobile Source 1,245.4
Solid Waste Generation 40.6
Water Consumption 31.9
Annualized Construction 8.7
Total 1,460.2
Source: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 output provided in Appendix A.
Totals may appear not to sum due to rounding.
As shown in Table VIII-1, with the addition of the amortized construction GHG emissions discussed above, the model estimates that the project would result in annual emissions of approximately 1,460.2 MTCO2e.
Based on this analysis, the project’s conservatively quantified construction and operational period GHG emissions would be less than the SCAQMD-suggested screening level of 3,000 MTCO2e. In addition, this analysis will use a qualitative discussion of plan consistency to determine the potential significance of the project’s contribution to global GHG emissions and resulting environmental effects.
The project’s ability to comply with various state, regional, and local planning efforts to reduce GHGs are summarized below.
Applicable Plans and Regulations
2020 RTP/SCS
The SCAG 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), also referred to as Connect SoCal,
19 demonstrates the region’s ability to attain and exceed the State’s GHG emission reduction targets. The RTP/SCS is a regional plan for integrating the transportation network and related strategies with an overall land use pattern to accommodate projected growth, housing needs, and transportation demands.
The RTP/SCS focuses the majority of new housing and job growth in HQTAs and other opportunity areas such as commercial corridors, resulting in more opportunity for transit-oriented development. The project would be consistent with GHG reduction strategies in the RTP/SCS, which aim to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by changing the region’s land use and travel patterns, such as providing compact growth in areas accessible to transit, providing jobs closer to transit and in HQTAs, and providing biking and walking infrastructure to improve active transportation options, and transit access. Table VIII-2, Project Consistency with the SCAG RTP/SCS, provides a comparison of the project against the actions and strategies of the RTP/SCS.
19 Southern California Association of Governments, 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, Adopted September 3, 2020.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 40 November 2022
Table VIII-2
Project Consistency with the SCAG RTP/SCS
Actions and Strategies Consistency Analysis
Focus Growth Near Destinations & Mobility Options
Emphasize land use patterns that facilitate multimodal
access to work, educational and other destinations.
Consistent. The project would construct a senior living facility within an urbanized area and include
commercial and community facilities. Urban infill
mixed-use development is a land use pattern that
maximized local connectivity by providing homes and
jobs in areas where people already work and live. The
project will introduce homes for senior citizens, jobs for employees of the facility, and community and
commercial resources in an underutilized urban block.
Focus on a regional jobs/housing balance to reduce
commute times and distances and expand job
opportunities near transit and along center-focused main streets.
Consistent. Allowing the mixed-use development will
create new jobs in an area close to single and multifamily residential areas.
Plan for growth near transit investments and support
implementation of first/last mile strategies.
Consistent. Although the project is not within a high
quality transit area, it is located on a center-focused main street near the Paramount CBD, increasing density
which will encourage increased transit connections in
the future.
Promote the redevelopment of underperforming retail
developments and other outmoded nonresidential uses.
Consistent. The project would redevelop a portion of an existing golf course with residences.
Prioritize infill and redevelopment of underutilized land to accommodate new growth, increase amenities and
connectivity in existing neighborhoods.
Consistent. The project would redevelop a poorly used
church facility and two low-density, underutilized
commercial parcels. The facility will provide
community facilities and general commercial/retail
suites in an area previously constrained by outdated land uses.
Encourage design and transportation options that reduce the reliance on and number of solo car trips (this could include mixed uses or locating and orienting close to
existing destinations).
Consistent. The project would increase density on a
center-focused main street and provide new facilities
and employment opportunities for nearby residences.
Identify ways to “right size” parking requirements and
promote alternative parking strategies (e.g. shared
parking or smart parking).
Consistent. The proposed project significantly
increases the intensity of use on the site with
approximately four times the amount of floor space as
the previous uses, without expanding the parking fourfold.
Promote Diverse Housing Choices
Preserve and rehabilitate affordable housing and prevent displacement.
Not Applicable. The project site would not remove
existing residences, including affordable housing, or
displace residences.
Identify funding opportunities for new workforce and
affordable housing development.
Compatible. This action does not directly apply to the
project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal, however, the project will produce six income-restricted independent living units.
Create incentives and reduce regulatory barriers for
building context sensitive accessory dwelling units to
increase housing supply.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 41 November 2022
Actions and Strategies Consistency Analysis
Provide support to local jurisdictions to streamline and lessen barriers to housing development that supports
reduction of GHG emissions.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Leverage Technology Innovations
Promote low emission technologies such as
neighborhood electric vehicles, shared rides hailing, car sharing, bike sharing and scooters by providing
supportive and safe infrastructure such as dedicated
lanes, charging and parking/drop-off space.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Improve access to services through technology—such as
telework and telemedicine as well as other incentives
such as a “mobility wallet,” an app-based system for
storing transit and other multi-modal payments.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG, the City, and various transit
authorities are responsible for meeting this goal.
Identify ways to incorporate “micro-power grids” in
communities, for example solar energy, hydrogen fuel
cell power storage and power generation.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Support Implementation of Sustainability Policies
Pursue funding opportunities to support local
sustainable development implementation projects that
reduce GHG emissions.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Support statewide legislation that reduces barriers to
new construction and that incentivizes development
near transit corridors and stations.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Support local jurisdictions in the establishment of
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing Districts,
Community Revitalization and Investment Authorities,
or other tax increment or value capture tools to finance sustainable infrastructure and development projects,
including parks and open space.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Work with local jurisdictions/communities to identify
opportunities and assess barriers to implement
sustainability strategies.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Enhance partnerships with other planning organizations
to promote resources and best practices in the SCAG
region.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Continue to support long range planning efforts by local jurisdictions.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Provide educational opportunities to local decisions
makers and staff on new tools, best practices and
policies related to implementing the Sustainable
Communities Strategy.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Promote a Green Region
Support development of local climate adaptation and
hazard mitigation plans, as well as project
implementation that improves community resiliency to
climate change and natural hazards.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 42 November 2022
Actions and Strategies Consistency Analysis
Support local policies for renewable energy production, reduction of urban heat islands and carbon
sequestration.
Not applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Integrate local food production into the regional
landscape.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Promote more resource efficient development focused
on conservation, recycling and reclamation.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Preserve, enhance and restore regional wildlife
connectivity.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Reduce consumption of resource areas, including
agricultural land.
Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to
the project, as SCAG is responsible for meeting this
goal.
Identify ways to improve access to public park space. Not Applicable. This action does not directly apply to the project, as SCAG and the City are responsible for
meeting this goal.
Paramount Climate Action Plan
The City adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in July of 2021 which: “outlines strategies, goals, and actions for reducing City of Paramount’s municipal and community-wide GHG emissions and for preparing the community for the anticipated impacts of climate change.”20 The goals of the CAP are pursued through a list of measures which the project may be compared against for consistency. These measures are provided in Table VIII-3, Project Consistency with CAP Measures.
Table VIII-3
Project Consistency with CAP Measures
Measures Consistency Analysis
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION
E1: Improve Energy Efficiency of Existing Buildings
E2: Promote Green Building
E3: Improve Efficiency of Municipal Operations and
Public Infrastructure
Consistent. As new construction the project will be
required to meet Title 24 energy-efficiency standards
and applicable Green Building standards.
RENEWABLE ENERGY
R1: Increase Local Renewable Energy Generation
R2: Promote Community Choice Energy (CCE) and
Utility Renewable Energy
R3: Promote Conversion from Natural Gas to Clean
Energy
Compatible. The project will be reviewed by the City
through the plan check process and will be subject to the City-imposed energy features, assuring compatibility
with the goal of applicable measure R3.
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
TR1: Support the Transition to Electric and ZeroEmissions VehiclesConsistent. The project will be required to comply with CALGreen codes which require a portion of parking
spaces to be EV Capable, making it consistent with
20 City of Paramount, Climate Action Plan, July 2021.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 43 November 2022
Measures Consistency Analysis
TR2: Improve Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure
TR3: Expand Public Transit Options and “Last-Mile”
Connectivity
TR4: Expand Car Sharing, Bike Sharing, and Ride
Sharing
TR5: Improve Traffic Safety and Flow
TR6: Support Transportation Demand Management
applicable measure TR1.
LAND USE & COMMUNITY DESIGN
LU: Promote Smart Growth, TOD, and Complete
Neighborhoods
Consistent. The project is an urban infill development
which will increase residential density and provide
neighborhood-sized community and commercial/retail
facilities in an amenities-poor area.
WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS
WA1: Promote Water Conservation
WA2: Promote Water Recycling and Greywater Use
Consistent. As new construction the project will be
required to meet State and County requirements for
efficient appliances and water conservation.
WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING
WR1: Promote Solid Waste Diversion Consistent. Although this measure is focused on City policy, as new construction the project will be required to meet State and County requirements to divert waste
from landfills during both construction and operations
stages.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, PARKS, URBAN FORESTRY, AND AGRICULTURE GA1: Support Urban Tree-Planting, Park Access, and
Green Infrastructure
GA2: Support Local Agriculture and Food Production
Consistent. The project will be removing one existing
street tree and replacing it with ten new trees,
significantly expanding coverage on the block,
consistent with applicable measure GA1.
GREEN BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY
GB1: Engage with Partner and Local Industries and
Businesses to Reduce Emissions
GB2: Grow the Local Green Economy
Not Applicable. Although the project will create new
jobs that do not rely upon polluting activities, these
measures primarily concern the City’s efforts to address existing businesses and growth of new clean technology
businesses.
Plan Consistency Conclusion
In summary, the project’s net increase in GHG emissions would be below the SCAQMD suggested draft screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e, and as an infill development subject to current efficiency standards and code requirements, the project would not conflict with plans and regulations established for the purpose of reducing GHG, such as the RTP/SCS, CalGreen Building Code, or the CAP. Therefore, the project’s potential impacts regarding GHG emissions would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 44 November 2022
As described in the evaluation discussed in Section VIII.a., the project would be consistent with local and regional plans, policies, and regulations adopted for reducing GHG emissions. As such, the project’s potential to result in impacts regarding conflicts with GHG reduction plans would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 45 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS. Would the project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard or excessive noise for people residing or
working in the project area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
g. Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
The following analysis is based in part on the project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report (Phase I ESA) dated April 22, 2022 prepared by Citadel EHS and provided as Appendix E. This Phase I ESA specifically targeted the large northern parcel of the project site, however, the Phase I evaluated the adjacent auto repair garage as part of its due diligence, as well as a cursory review of the final parcel to the south and nearby sites listed within relevant regulatory databases, and as such it is valid for the entire project site.
Additionally, the two southern parcels were evaluated in the 2020 MND concerning those properties.
Impact Analysis
a. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would create a significant hazard to the public or environment though the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 46 November 2022
During operations standard cleansers and the like used for housekeeping and maintenance purposes will be used by residents, tenants, and staff. Some of these products in very large quantities may be considered hazardous on a technical basis (for example, chlorine bleach), but their use and storage will be commensurate with the need, and dangerous quantities will not be necessary for operation of the facility.
Landscaping planters similarly may need occasional fertilizing but there will be no need to use or store large quantities. Otherwise, will be no use of hazardous materials during project operations, and therefore operation of the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and impacts would be less than significant.
During construction equipment will use diesel fuel, however, use and care of all diesel worksite equipment is regulated by provisions within Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, known as the Cal/OSHA Title 8 regulations. Compliance with these regulations will ensure proper use of worksite fuels and chemicals, which will only be in use during the construction period. If a worksite accident involving release of hazardous materials should occur the project would be required to report it to the Los Angeles County Fire Department Health Hazardous Materials division, which would determine the proper response. As such, construction of the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A significant impact could occur if a project would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
According to the Phase I ESA there are no known recognized environmental conditions (REC) or historic RECs (HREC) at the site, and no reported release incidents that would represent RECs in connection with the site, or a source of a release that would be likely to contribute to a vapor encroachment conditions on the site. However, the ESA found that the parcel with the auto repair garage had two Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) on site in the past. According to Los Angeles Department of Public Works records there was an 8,000 gallon UST and 3,000 gallon UST that both once held gasoline, with the 3,000 gallon UST converted to hold waste oil at one point. Both USTs were abandoned by 2012 and the 8,000 gallon UST removed with the 3,000 gallon UST filled with concrete and closed in place. Soil and groundwater tests were performed at the site and there was no indication of leakage, subsequently the Los Angeles RWQCB issued a letter on March 25, 2016 that no further action was required.21 The presence of the USTs therefore does not constitute an REC or HREC as there was no indication of contamination. In addition, the analysis of the property’s history concluded there is not sufficient reason to suspect there is some unknown de minimis environmental condition present either. Therefore, the site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern when excavated. Should excavation of the remaining UST be required during construction, consultation with the Los Angeles County Fire Department Health Hazardous Materials division would be required prior to removal, ensuring proper handling and disposal.
The Phase 1 ESA did conclude that because the church building was built prior to bans on the use of asbestos, lead-based paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in building and finishing materials, the buildings should be tested for such materials. The auto repair building and bar are both older than the church complex and would be as likely to be constructed with such materials. SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos 21 Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Online File Review, Site No. 024614, File No. 055601, Document No. 000830100, Underground Storage Tank Program- Case Referral Response Auto Guadalajara Alignment 16675 Paramount Boulevard, Paramount (Case Number R-55601), Dated March 25, 2016, available at:
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/epd/CleanLA/OpenFileReview.aspx
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 47 November 2022
Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities) requires a survey for asbestos prior to demolition of the structures. The Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard (SB 460) requires employers to protect workers at job sites from lead exposure, which avoids environmental exposure, and as the building is presumed to contain lead-based paint22 provisions in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, Division 1, Chapter 8, Accreditation, Certification, and Work Practicesfor Lead-Based Paint and Lead Hazards apply, including Section 36050, Lead-Safe Work Practices which requires containment of lead during activities.
PCBs were commercially manufactured from 1929 until production was banned in 1979 by the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). PCBs are toxic to humans and animals and do not readily break down once in the environment, so they can persist for long periods cycling through the food chain or traveling through water and soil. Prior to 1979, PCBs were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications and in buildings used in such things as fluorescent light ballasts, caulks and sealants, insulating materials, adhesives, rubber window seals and gaskets, ceiling tiles, and acoustic boards.
To mitigate any potential PCB hazards Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 (PCBs) shall be employed to ensure proper care is taken and any potential impacts are reduced to less than significant levels.
Mitigation Measures:
Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 – Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Prior to demolition, concurrent with regulatory-required surveys for asbestos, the applicant shall have each premises evaluated for the presence of PCBs by a qualified consultant. If material testing is necessary materials targeted should be those installed or manufactured prior to 1979, such as fluorescent light ballasts, caulks and sealants, insulating materials, adhesives and mastics, rubber window seals and gaskets, ceiling tiles, and acoustic boards. If PCPs are found in concentrations of 50 ppm or greater handling and disposal of the material will be subject to both federal and state laws. This may include reporting to U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and/or the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The disposal of PCBs waste is regulated under the TSCA. Building materials containing PCBs at or above 50 ppm that were manufactured with PCBs fall under the category of PCBs bulk product wastes.
Building materials such as concrete, brick, metal contaminated with PCBs are PCBs remediation wastes (e.g., concrete contaminated with PCBs from caulk that contains PCBs). Disposal is also regulated under CCR Title 22, Section Division 4.5, Chapter 12, Standards Applicable to Hazardous Waste Generators.
Compliance with federal and state PCB disposal requirements shall be demonstrated to the City prior to and during demolition activities.
c. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur if a project would emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
The site is 0.25 miles from McKinley Elementary School located at 6822 Paramount Blvd. However, the project is a senior living facility and will not handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste as part of its operations, and will not produce hazardous emissions. As discussed above in IX.b, the Phase I ESA determined there is no significant risk of hazardous materials being released through ground-disturbing activities. Also, compliance with federal, state, and local laws regarding disposal of potential hazardous materials in the building (asbestos, lead-based paint, PCBs) will ensure that those materials are contained on site and disposed of correctly throughout the demolition process, and potential 22 Buildings constructed prior to 1978 are presumed to contain led-based paint unless demonstrated otherwise through regulated testing.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 48 November 2022
impacts regarding release of hazardous materials within 0.25 miles of a school would remain less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
California Government Code Section 65962.5 requires various state agencies to compile lists of hazardous waste disposal facilities, unauthorized release from underground storage tanks, contaminated drinking water wells, and solid waste facilities from which there is known migration of hazardous waste and submit such information to the Secretary for Environmental Protection on at least an annual basis. A search of the California Environmental Protection Agency’s (CalEPA’s) Cortese List Data Resources databases in the Phase I ESA documents that the project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Therefore, the project would not result in the creation or exacerbation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment as a result of previous uses being included in lists of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.
Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. e. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport and would result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the area.
The nearest airport to the project site is the Long Beach Airport approximately 3.8 miles to the south. The project is not located within an airport land use plan for the Long Beach Airport, and is not within two miles of another airport, therefore, no impact would occur.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. f. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would interfere with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
Development of the project site may require temporary partial lane closures due to construction activities, but such closures would only cause temporary inconvenience, as they would only occur during the construction phase, and for short durations. Any lane closures would require review and approval from the City to ensure access remains adequate for emergency services. No complete street closures would occur, and the project would not substantially interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans that require travel on Paramount Blvd. The proposed project would not cause permanent alterations to vehicular circulation routes or impede public access or travel upon Paramount Blvd. or the public alley behind the complex. Therefore, the potential to interfere with any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. g. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project is located in proximity to wildland areas and would pose a potential fire hazard, which could affect persons or structures in the area in the event of a fire.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 49 November 2022
The project site is located in a highly urbanized area and is not located in, nor in proximity to, any undeveloped wildland area or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ).23 Therefore, no impact related to wildland fire would occur.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 23 CalFire, FRAP, Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer, Accessed on January 20, 2022 at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 50 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.
Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise
substantially degrade surface or ground water
quality?
b. Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere with groundwater recharge such that
the project may impede sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern
of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river or
through the addition of impervious surfaces, in
a manner which would:
i. Result in substantial on- or offsite erosion
or siltation;
ii. Substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or offsite;
iii. Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv. Impede or redirect flood flows?
d. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a
water quality control plan or sustainable
groundwater management plan?
Impact Analysis
a. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality.
The City of Paramount is a party to the Los Angeles County MS4 permit requirements (Order No. R4- 2012-0175), issued by the Los Angeles RWCQB in accordance with the County’s NPDES permit, CAS004001. These requirements regulate stormwater and non-stormwater discharges, and constitute the water quality standards and discharge requirements the project is subject to. Compliance with the regulation ensures no standards or requirements are violated.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 51 November 2022
Compliance is achieved through implementation of BMPs that reduce pollutants in water runoff. Chapter
8.20.210 of the City’s Municipal Code requires that projects comply with Order No. R4-2012-0175 through integration of low impact development (LID) strategies. Prior to issuance of a grading permit projects must produce an LID plan that demonstrates which BMPs or series of BMPs will be used during construction to prevent construction-related discharges from entering storm drains, and minimize sediment transport and erosion. The project must also be designed to retain stormwater runoff generated on site during a 0.75 inch 24-hour storm event, or an 85th percentile 24-hour storm event, whichever is greater. Stormwater is retained through infiltration, evapotranspiration, bioretention and/or rainfall harvest and use. The project will not substantially change the amount of impervious surfaces on the site, but as the project is subject to MS4 permitting requirements and the previous use was not it will generate less stormwater runoff than the previous use, and what stormwater that leaves the site will be cleaner than previous runoff. Therefore, compliance with MS4 permit requirements would reduce potential impacts related to the violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or the degradation of surface or ground water quality to less than significant levels.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that it may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin.
The project will obtain water services through connection to the City’s Water Division. No groundwater extraction will occur on site, and the amount of water the proposed residences will use will not significantly impact the groundwater supplies the City utilizes. The project site has very little open ground area with the existing structures present so the site has not been a source of substantial groundwater infiltration. If infiltration on site is reduced from pre-construction levels it will not have a significant impact on the amount of infiltration reaching the groundwater basin. Therefore, the project’s impact on groundwater supplies or sustainable management of groundwater would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c.i. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation.
There are no streams or rivers or significant hydrological features on the site, and the project will not substantially change the amount of impervious surfaces on the site. The project will be required to retain stormwater on site as explained in part X.a above, so the amount of stormwater runoff generated by the project will be less than what was generated pre-construction. A reduction in stormwater runoff would serve to reduce erosion or siltation, however there are no nearby natural drainages where erosion might occur due to excess runoff from the project site. Therefore, the project will not result in conditions that case substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation and there would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c.ii. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 52 November 2022
As explained above, upon buildout of the project the amount of stormwater runoff generated from the site will be less than during the previous use, and therefore the project represents a reduction in potential impacts involving excess runoff. The amount of impermeable surfaces on the site is not changing significantly, and the proposed project is subject to MS4 permit requirements that require retention of stormwater the previous use was not. Therefore, the project will reduce the rate or amount of surface runoff and there will be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c.iii. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
As discussed above, the project will be required to incorporate LID BMPs to manage and treat runoff in accordance with the City’s LID requirements. The amount of stormwater runoff generated by the site will be reduced from existing conditions, and what stormwater that isn’t retained on site will not be “first flush” stormwater and therefore cleaner than stormwater generated by the previous use. Therefore, the project will not create or contribute runoff which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, and there would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c.iv. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows.
The project site is located within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood zone designation of “Zone X, Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee”.24 This is an area of moderate flood risk where the levee provides protection from the 1 percent annual chance flood. If a flooding situation occurred waters would be conveyed through existing stormwater drain facilities in the streets. The project site is not close enough to a water source or drainage to impede or redirect flood flows in a significant manner. Therefore, the project would have a less than significant impact on flood flows.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could potentially occur if a project would risk the release of pollutants from inundation due to location in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone.
As explained above the proposed project is an area with moderate flood risk due to the presence of a levee, which would be the L.A. River flood channel. A seiche, a wave created when a body of water is shaken such as by seismic events, is a concern at water storage facilities because inundation can occur if the wave overflows a containment wall. No major water retaining structures are near the project site. Also, the project site is not within a tsunami zone25. Risk of the project site being inundated with water is low as the river is
1.0 to 1.5 miles from the site and considering water depth and volume. Also, the proposed senior living 24Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette for project site, January 20, 2022. 25 California Department of Conservation Los Angeles County Tsunami Hazard Area Maps accessed January 20, 2022 at:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps/los-angeles
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 53 November 2022
facility would not utilize significant quantities of hazardous materials, and would have no storage of any such materials outside of closed rooms. Therefore, impacts pertaining to the risk of release of pollutants due to the site’s location in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. e. Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could potentially occur if a project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.
As explained previously, in compliance with the City’s LID requirements the project would capture and treat stormwater consistent with MS4 permit requirements. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 54 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING.
Would the project:
a. Physically divide an established community?
b. Cause a significant environmental impact due to
a conflict with any land use plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Impact Analysis
a. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would physically divide an established community.
The proposed project is infill redevelopment that replaces a former church facility, auto repair garage, and bar, with a senior living facility with ground floor retail and publicly accessible components. The site fronts Paramount Blvd and is separated from adjacent residences to the west by a public alley. The project would redevelop a parcel that was previously occupied with urban development and would thus not disrupt, divide, or isolate any component of the existing community. There would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.
The existing zoning of the northern parcel is C-3, General Commercial, and it has a land use designation of Area Plan. According to the Paramount Municipal Code the C-3 zone serves to facilitate on-premise retail and service businesses, and regulate the form of buildings to maintain an intensity of land use that is commensurate with the City’s ability to maintain adequate infrastructure and general environment.
According to the Paramount General Plan the CBD was created to facilitate redevelopment and revitalization of the area covered by the Plan, and limited uses to only commercial or office within the plan area.
The project’s northerly parcel will require an amendment to the general plan to change the land use designation from Area Plan to Mixed-Use Commercial Residential and a zone change from C-3 to PD-PS zone, which will match the two southern parcels, because the proposed use is not allowed by the C-3 zone or Area Plan designation. These changes will allow the project to proceed and the standards the project will meet will be determined by the requirements of the new designation and zoning. Meeting these new requirements will ensure that the project does not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation.
The amendment and zone change are made to allow the use, they do not allow the project to create an impact that would otherwise not be allowed under the existing designations. That is, the change in designation and zoning merely allows a variation in use from what was originally designated on the site.
However, the new land use designation and zoning classification are similar to those previously allowed and similar to surrounding uses. The proposed land uses are compatible with the site’s surroundings and
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 55 November 2022
due to the similarities, would not introduce any significant impacts the previous zoning may have intended to avoid.
The new land use designation will allow the project’s proposed mixed-use to proceed, and the PD-PS zone will allow the City to appropriately regulate the project according to its context and unique mixed-use.
Section 17.72.020 of the Paramount Municipal Code explains the purpose of the zone as such:
[The purpose of the zone] is to insure [sic] a fuller realization of the general plan of the City than that which would result from the application of present zoning regulations. ... It is the intent of this zone classification to encourage development of superior design and quality through creative application of the City’s zoning criteria and through the creation of performance standards applied to specific development and recorded as conditions and covenants against the land.
Compliance with the provisions of the new zoning means meeting specific performance standards the City created specifically for the project to ensure it is compatible with the goals and policies of the general plan.
Therefore, the project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to conflicts with a zoning or land use regulation created with the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant.
Regionally, the project site is located within the planning area of the SCAG, the federally designated metropolitan planning organization. SCAG is responsible for reviewing regionally significant local plans, projects, and programs for consistency with SCAG's adopted regional plans. The project does not meet the criteria for being regionally significant pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, Section 15206; therefore, there would be no conflict with any SCAG policy adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect, as explained in Section VIII. The project is also located within the planning area of the SCAQMD AQMP. As evaluated in Section III, Air Quality, the project is consistent with applicable regional plans, and no further analysis is required.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 56 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the project:
a. Would the project result in the loss of
availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of future value to the region and the
residents of the State?
b. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery
site delineated on a local general plan, Specific
Plan, or other land use plan?
a-b. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project site is located in an area used or available for extraction of a regionally important mineral resource, or if a project development would convert an existing or future regionally important mineral extraction use to another use, or if a project development would affect access to a Site used or potentially available for regionally important mineral resource extraction.
The project is an infill development on a small lot in an urban area that has been fully developed for decades.
There is no potential for access to a mineral resource at the project site, therefore there is no availability to any potential mineral resource. As such, there is no impact associated with the loss of availability of a mineral resource.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 57 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XIII. NOISE.
Would the project result in:
a. Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in
the vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration
or groundborne noise levels?
c. For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Impact Analysis
The following discussion assesses the potential noise impacts of the project and provides a brief description of the key terms and concepts used in the analysis of noise impacts. The construction impact analysis utilizes a construction equipment list based on CalEEMod defaults generated for Section III. CalEEMod outputs are attached as Appendix A.
Noise is unwanted sound. Sound is mechanical energy that is transmitted by pressure waves through a compressible medium such as air. The sound pressure level, expressed in decibels (dB), has become the most common descriptor used to characterize the loudness of an ambient sound level. Sound or noise can vary in intensity by over one million times within the range of human hearing so a logarithmic loudness scale similar to the Richter Scale is used to keep sound intensity numbers manageable. The human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies within the entire spectrum so noise levels at maximum human sensitivity are factored more heavily into sound descriptions in a process called A-weighting written as dB(A) or dBA. Subsequent references to decibels written as dB should be understood as A weighted dB(A).
Time variations in noise exposure are typically expressed in Leq, a steady-state energy level equal to the energy content of the time varying period. Leq provides a statistical description of the sound level that is exceeded over some fraction of a given observation period. Because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, state law requires that, for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet time noise levels in a 24-hour noise descriptor called the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), a weighted average of noise levels over time. a. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. A project may have a significant noise impact if it would cause a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 58 November 2022
Noise impacts are discussed in the context of construction-related noise and operational-related noise.
Regulatory Setting
California Building Code
The State defers to local jurisdictions for the regulation of construction noise.
Title 24 of the CCR for multiple family dwellings, hotel and motel rooms, requires an interior CNEL of 45 dBA. In 1988, the State Building Standards Commission expanded that standard to include all habitable rooms in residential use, including single-family dwelling units. Since typical noise attenuation within older, existing residential structures with closed windows is at least 20 dBA, an exterior noise exposure of 65 dBA CNEL is generally the noise land-use compatibility guideline for residential dwellings in California. However, newer construction practices with standard features such as mandatory double paned windows typically offer about 30 dB of noise attenuation, which would provide sufficient noise reduction to meet the residential interior noise requirement of 45 dBA CNEL for projects with an exterior noise exposure of up to 75 dBA. Projects that would require windows and doors to remain closed to achieve an acceptable interior noise level will typically necessitate the use of air conditioning and mechanical ventilation.
City General Plan
The City does not regulate noise levels for construction activities, provided a valid permit has been issued and the activity is confined between the hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., per Section 9.12.060.B.4(a) of the Paramount Municipal Code.
The Safety Element of the City General Plan contains policies related to noise control. The element reiterates guidelines from the State Office of Planning and Research (OPR), Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of Noise Elements of General Plans, which has been updated since the publication of the General Plan. Guidelines from the OPR remain similar to the guidelines published in the General Plan, but with some refinements. The General Plan states that residential uses should not be located in areas exceeding 70 dB CNEL.26 The OPR states that a CNEL between 65 and 70 dB CNEL should be considered conditionally acceptable for multifamily residential, in contrast to a CNEL below 65 dB which would be considered normally acceptable.27
Noise from facility operations are regulated according to the zoning of a property, according to the Table XIII-1, Paramount Municipal Code Noise Standards, reproduced from Section 9.12.040 of the Code:
Table XIII-1
Paramount Municipal Code Noise Standards
Noise Zone Day (maximum)
6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Night (maximum)
10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Industrial and Commercial 82 decibels 77 decibels
R1 and R2 62 decibels 57 decibels
R3 and R4 67 decibels 62 decibels
The maximum levels listed in the table would be the noise as measured from any residential property adjoining the suspect property.
26 Paramount General Plan, Safety Element, Noise and Land Use Compatibility, August 7, 2007. 27 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan guidelines and Technical Advisories, Appendix D, Noise Elements Guidelines, updated 2017.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 59 November 2022
Existing Conditions
Paramount Boulevard is a major arterial and as such noise from traffic on the Boulevard will be the primary source of noise at the project site. Average noise levels at the project site are assumed to be between 60 dB and 70 dB. This is based upon models from the Federal Bureau of Transportation Statistics, and measurements published in a recent MND for the property directly south of the subject property. The Bureau of Transportation Statistics created the National Transportation Noise Mapping Tool, which calculates noise levels throughout the country for different modes of transportation for purposes of tracking trends over time. Noise levels on the Boulevard in the vicinity of the project site are calculated to be within a 60 dB Leq to 69.9 dB average range over a 24 hour period.28 Measurements published in the IS/MND for the Paramount Senior Living project at 16675 & 16683 Paramount Boulevard recorded an average of 68.2 dB.29 All of these cited estimates are within OPR’s “normally acceptable” residential range of below 65 dB CNEL or “conditionally acceptable” residential range of 65dB CNEL to 70 dB CNEL.
Construction Noise
Provided the project is constructed between the hours of 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., the project would conform to the construction noise standards established in the Paramount Municipal Code. Because there are no noise standards of other agencies that are applicable to the project or the project site, conformance with construction hour restrictions would not exceed applicable standards of local agencies or other agencies.
However, impacts could still occur despite conformance with the local noise ordinance, and therefore construction noise is analyzed.
The nearest sensitive receptors to construction noise would be the residences on the opposite side of the 15- foot alley behind the project site. A bungalow court between the church and auto repair garage has two residences oriented toward the alley, and these residences would be the properties most affected. Other residences adjacent to the project site have garages facing the alley and living quarters oriented toward Eureka Avenue. The distance of the living quarters of these residences to the project site range between approximately 40 to 50 feet. The two bungalows facing the alley are closer, at approximately 25 feet from the project site, so this distance is used to evaluate potential impacts.
A conservative estimate of anticipated construction noise has been determined utilizing The Construction Noise Handbook prepared by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), which includes a national database of construction equipment noise levels. The FHWA uses these reference noise emission levels in the Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). Table XIII-2, Construction Equipment Noise Levels, identifies highest (Lmax) noise levels associated with quantity and type of construction equipment. The RCNM also provides an acoustical usage factor which estimates the fraction of time each piece of equipment is operating at full power during construction. The acoustical usage factor (U.F.), is a key input used to calculate sound levels averaged over time expressed as Leq. Table 5 adjusts the maximum noise levels (Lmax) using the U.F. published in the FHWA Construction Noise Handbook. The sound level prediction equation is expressed as follows for the hourly average sound level (Leq) at distance (D) between the source and receiver.
Leq = Lmax – 20 • log (D/50) + 10 • log (U.F./100) – I.L.
Where:
Lmax is the published reference noise level at 50 feet
U.F. is the acoustical usage factor for full power operation per hour I.L. is the insertion loss for intervening barriers
28 Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Noise Map, 2018 road data. 29 Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration, Paramount Senior Living, 16675 & 16683 Paramount Boulevard, December 8, 2020.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 60 November 2022
Table XIII-2 lists equipment types and quantities similar to those anticipated to be used for the project. The table is organized by equipment and describes the noise level for each individual piece of equipment at a 25-foot distance between the equipment and receptor as provided in the RCNM. The levels are calculated to represent conditions outside on a calm day with a clean line of site between the receptor and the equipment (no intervening barriers).
As shown below in Table XIII-2, the construction equipment that could generate the highest noise level are the concrete/industrial saws which would generate a maximum noise level of 96 dBA Lmax at 25 ft and an average noise level of 89 dBA Leq at 25 ft. Construction proceeds in phases such as demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Therefore, at any particular phase of construction, contractors would use only the types of equipment needed as shown in Table XIII2, rather than using all the equipment throughout all phases. Furthermore, decibels are logarithmic units; therefore, sound levels cannot be added by ordinary arithmetic means. When the sound pressure level of two sources is equal, the resulting noise level is 3 dB greater than the noise level of one source.
Table XIII-2
Construction Equipment Noise Levels
Phase Equipment Type Quantity Lmax at 25
feet (dBA) 1, 2
Usage Factor
(U.F.) 3
Leq at 25
feet (dBA)
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 96 20 89
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 88 40 84
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 85 40 81
Site Preparation Graders 1 91 40 87
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 88 40 84
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 85 40 81
Grading Graders 1 91 40 87
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 88 40 84
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 85 40 81
Building
Construction
Forklifts 1 81 20 74
Generator Sets 1 87 50 79
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 85 40 81
Welders 3 80 40 72
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 86 20 79
Pavers 1 83 50 80
Paving Equipment 1 89 20 81
Rollers 1 86 20 79
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 85 40 81
Architectural
Coating
Air Compressors 1 84 40 80
1 Noise levels are for individual equipment pieces. Each piece of equipment would operate at a distance from other equipment. 2 Source: Federal Highway Administration, Construction Noise Handbook, 2006, Ch. 9, Construction Equipment Noise Levels and Ranges. 3 Usage Factor (U.F.) is the portion of time equipment is operating at full power.
Although neither the City nor the State have a set level of construction noise that is considered significant or harmful, reasonable guideposts can be established for the purpose of analysis based upon known impacts.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention two hours of exposure to 80-85 dB can cause
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 61 November 2022
damage to hearing, which would present a significant impact.30 Based upon this, a target maximum of 80 dB for construction noise can be used a reasonable threshold of significance.
Although construction equipment will typically not operate for two hours uninterrupted, and noise inside a residence with windows closed would be reduced by at least 20 dB, high outside noise levels would nonetheless be burdensome when experienced by the nearby residents. As presented in Table XIII-2, several pieces of construction equipment would reach or exceed the 80 dB threshold. To reduce noise levels to less than 80 dB, the following Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through MM NOI- 5, would be incorporated in the project to reduce temporary construction noise effects.
MM-NOI 1: All capable diesel-powered construction vehicles shall be equipped with exhaust mufflers, aftermarket dampening system or other suitable noise reduction devices.
MM-NOI-2: Power construction equipment (including combustion engines), fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with state-of-the-art noise shielding and muffling devices (consistent with manufacturers’ standards). All equipment shall be properly maintained to assure that no additional noise, due to worn or improperly maintained parts, would be generated.
MM-NOI-3: On-site power shall be used instead of generators or air compressors, when feasible.
MM-NOI-4: Grading and construction contractors shall use rubber-tired equipment rather than metal-tracked equipment, when feasible.
MM-NOI-5: Temporary and impermeable noise barriers shall be placed at the west, north, and south property boundaries during construction of the project. The barriers shall be at least 12 feet in height and provide a transmission loss of at least 25 dB at 500 hertz (such as 3/4- inch plywood).
The results of implementing these measures is presented in Table XIII-3, Reduced Construction Noise Levels at Sensitive Receptors.
Table XIII-3
Reduced Construction Noise Levels at Sensitive Receptors Phase Equipment Type 1
Unreduced
Noise Level
at 25’
(dB Leq)
Noise
Attenuation
from Noise
Barrier (dB)
(NOI-MM-5)
Reduced Noise
Level at 25’
(dB Leq)
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 89 15 74
Rubber Tired Dozers 84 15 69
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 81 15 66
Site Preparation Graders 87 15 72
Rubber Tired Dozers 84 15 69
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 81 15 66
30 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, What Noise Cause Hearing Loss? Accessed February 18, 2022 at:
https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/hearing_loss/what_noises_cause_hearing_loss.html
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 62 November 2022
Phase Equipment Type 1
Unreduced
Noise Level
at 25’
(dB Leq)
Noise
Attenuation
from Noise
Barrier (dB)
(NOI-MM-5)
Reduced Noise
Level at 25’
(dB Leq)
Grading Graders 87 15 72
Rubber Tired Dozers 84 15 69
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 81 15 66
Building Construction Forklifts 74 15 59
Generator Sets 79 15 64
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 81 15 66
Welders 72 15 57
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 79 15 64
Pavers 80 15 65
Paving Equipment 81 15 66
Rollers 79 15 64
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 81 15 66
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 80 15 65
As shown on Table XIII-3, by providing the construction noise barriers, temporary construction noise levels at this nearest residence would be reduced to approximately 74 dBA Leq (the highest value in Table XIII3) during the site demolition phase, which would be the loudest phase of construction. 31 The addition of
mufflers and shielding to equipment will also further reduce noise levels, but the amount will vary according to the equipment and is not quantified.
As explained above, maximum noise increases would be experienced at the nearest sensitive receptor temporarily only within the limited duration of particular construction activities. During the building construction phase, which is the majority of the construction duration, the calculated average noise level would be reduced to 66 dB Leq at the nearest sensitive receptor with use of the construction noise barriers.
As discussed previously, because the City does not have a numerical threshold for construction noise, but regulates construction noise by setting the allowable hours for construction in the vicinity of residential land uses, the project would comply with the City’s noise requirements. Use of noise barriers will reduce construction noise to levels below 80 dB and would not be potentially harmful to nearby residents, and as such, construction noise impacts would be less than significant.
Operational Noise
Noise generated by the facility while in operation will be minimal. There are no proposed uses within or outside the building that would be expected to generate noise significant enough to create an annoyance outside of the property. Buildings on their own are not significant generators of noise. Generally, the most significant source of noise from a building will be its HVAC systems. The HVAC units of the proposed building will be located on the roof. Due to the elevation of the units and placement behind solid barriers, their operation would not result in significant operational noise impacts. Noise is most audible where there is a direct line-of-sight. Any solid barrier that breaks the line-of-sight between the source and the receiver greatly reduces the noise levels from the source since the sound must travel over, around, or through the barrier to be heard. The project’s roof-mounted equipment would be 34 feet above grade, in which case the building itself acts as a barrier since the equipment would not be visible from the ground or from within 31 Based on equations for barrier insertion loss from Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. A material with a transmission loss of at least 25 dB would be sufficient provide a reduction of 15 dB according to California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 63 November 2022
any building in the immediate vicinity. In addition, there are four-foot-tall solid parapets around the perimeter of the roof which will further help attenuate noise from the HVAC units. Only structures that have residential units at the same height or higher than the roof of the proposed building would have direct line-of-site to the HVAC units, and there are no such structures in the vicinity.
Traffic Noise
Upon completion, project-generated vehicle trips would cause an incremental increase in traffic noise in the immediate vicinity. As stated above, when the sound pressure level of two sources is equal, the resulting noise level is 3 dB greater than the noise level of one source. Thusly, to increase ambient noise levels by 3 dB, the project would have to double the amount of traffic on nearby roadways.
Noise from Paramount Boulevard would be the loudest noise source in the vicinity due to its high volume of traffic. Although the City does not have traffic counts available for the Boulevard, traffics counts dating from 2014 from the City of Long Beach place the Average Daily Traffic Volume of Paramount Boulevard at 70th Street (just below the project site) at 23,400 vehicles.32 Although there may have been a drop in traffic levels in the recent past due to the most severe periods of COVID restrictions, current and future traffic levels would be expected to be similar or greater to the recorded 2014 levels. The project is projected to generate approximately 441 Average Daily Trips (see Section XVII, Transportation) and thus would not approach doubling that number. Therefore the project would not increase the traffic noise level by more than a fraction of a decibel. Noise level increases of less than one decibel are not perceptible to the human ear even in a controlled laboratory environment. Traffic in the alley will likely be increased by presence of the project but would not be frequent enough to reach levels that would produce significant impacts resulting in more than 62 dB Leq between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Therefore, all project operational impacts would be less than significant and no operational mitigation measures are required.
Mitigation Measures:
Construction: Mitigation Measures MM NOI-1 through NOI-5 (above) are required.
Operational: No mitigation measures are required.
b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant vibration impact could occur if a project would expose people to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels.
Construction Vibration
Caltrans Groundborne Vibration Criteria
When construction equipment travels over unpaved surfaces or engages in soil movement, construction activities generate groundborne vibration. The effects of groundborne vibration include the discernible movement of building floors, rattling of windows, shaking of items on shelves or hanging on walls, and rumbling sounds. Vibration related problems generally occur due to resonances in the structural components of a building, because structures amplify groundborne vibration. The “soft” sedimentary conditions of much of southern California dampen groundborne vibration over a relatively short distance.
Groundborne vibration from construction activities rarely reach levels that can damage structures. Although there are no officially adopted regulatory standards for the point at which ground-borne vibration levels could cause structural damage. Caltrans provides vibration guidelines for structural damage, found in Table XIII-4, Vibration Damage Criteria Guidelines.
32 City of Long Beach, Engineering Bureau, Traffic Engineering Division, 2014 Citywide Traffic Flow map.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 64 November 2022
Table XIII-4
Vibration Damage Criteria Guidelines
Structure and Condition Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Transient 1 Intermittent 2
Extremely fragile historic buildings 0.12 0.08
Fragile buildings 0.2 0.1
Historic and some old buildings 0.5 0.25
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5
Source: California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, September 2013.
1 Sources create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. 2 Frequent or intermittent sources include impact or vibratory pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, and vibratory compaction equipment.
As shown in Table XIII-4, the criterion for structural vibration damage for new residential structures is
0.5 PPV in/sec for intermittent sources such as impact or vibratory pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, and vibratory compaction equipment. Based on the type of adjacent buildings and the type of equipment expected to be used in construction, a structural damage criterion of 0.5 PPV in/sec for new residential structures and 0.3 PPV in/sec for older residential structures for intermittent sources is the standard used in this analysis. The commercial building at the corner of Harrison Street and Paramount Boulevard was constructed in 1963 according to L.A. County Assessor records, as a conservative measure a structural damage criterion of 0.3 PPV in/sec would be used for this building as well.
In terms of human response, groundborne vibration can range from severe to barely perceptible depending on whether the source is transient or intermittent, the distance between the source and receptor, and the composition of the ground material. The Caltrans criteria for assessing human response is provided in Table XIII-5, Human Response to Groundborne Vibration Criteria.
Table XIII-5
Human Response to Groundborne Vibration Criteria
Human Response
Maximum PPV (in/sec)
Transient 1 Intermittent 2
Severe 2.00 0.40
Strongly perceptible 0.90 0.10
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Source: Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, 2013. 1 Sources of transient vibration create a single isolated vibration event, such as blasting or drop balls. 2 Frequent or intermittent sources include impact or vibratory pile drivers, pogo-stick compactors, crack-and-seat equipment, and vibratory compaction equipment.
As shown in Table XIII-5 human responses to ground-borne vibration vary from severe at 2.0 PPV in/sec for transient sources to barely perceptible at 0.01 PPV in/sec for intermittent sources. The Caltrans vibration criteria suggests the thresholds for human perception and annoyance are higher for transient vibration than for continuous or intermittent vibration. For this analysis, intermittent levels that could cause a strongly perceptible human response (i.e., 0.1 PPV in/sec) are the applicable standard.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 65 November 2022
The predicted vibration levels generated by construction equipment and potential associated impacts are provided in terms of PPV in/sec in Table XIII-6, Groundborne Vibration from Project Construction Equipment at Nearest Buildings.
The greatest vibration levels would be generated by loaded construction trucks operating on unpaved surfaces, which would generate vibration levels of 0.076 PPV in/sec 25 feet, according to the Federal Transit Administration.33 The surfaces around the project site are paved and will remain so, but during construction the site will be unpaved for a time after demolition.
As the nearest residential structure (occupied structure, not garage) is within 25 feet, vibration levels would potentially be felt at the 0.076 PPV in/sec level by persons in the occupied, which would not exceed the Caltrans guidelines for vibration damage to newer structures or the Caltrans guidelines for distinct perceptibility. Persons at all other structures, would experience similar or lower vibration levels because those structures are further away from the project construction boundary.
As shown in the preceding analysis, project construction would result in groundborne vibration levels below the applicable thresholds of significance for potential structural damage from construction vibration. In addition, due to the temporary and intermittent occurrence of vibration levels from construction, structural and human annoyance vibration impacts would be less than significant.
Table XIII-6
Groundborne Vibration from Project Construction Equipment at Nearest Buildings Construction
Equipment
Vibration
Levels at 25 ft
Vibration Damage
Impact Assessment Vibration Annoyance Impact Assessment PPV in/sec
at 25 ft 1
Potential
Damage
Threshold
(PPV in/sec)
Exceedance?
Potential
Annoyance
Threshold
(PPV in/sec) 2
Exceedance?
Loaded trucks 0.076 0.5 No 0.1 No
Small bulldozer 0.003 0.5 No 0.1 No
Source: Calculations from Envicom Corporation, September 2021 based on Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. 1
Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018. 2 Caltrans, Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, April 2020.
Operational Vibration
The City does not regulate operational vibrations, though nuisance vibrations from any individual operation could be potentially found unacceptable according to general nuisance laws. Nonetheless, the project would not house any activities that routinely produced significant vibrations in adjoining properties, and there is no equipment proposed for operation of the building that would produce significant vibrations in adjoining properties, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c. No impact. A significant noise impact could occur if a project would be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport, such that the project would expose people residing or working in the area to excessive noise levels. The nearest airports to the project site are the Long Beach Airport, a commercial airport located approximately 3.8 miles to the south, 33 Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, September 2018.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 66 November 2022
and the Compton Woodley Airport, a small public airport, located 4.5 miles to the west. According to the Los Angeles County Airport Land Use Commission, the project site is outside the 65 dBA CNEL Noise Impact Zone of Long Beach airport,34 and aircraft noise on the project site would therefore be within levels that are considered conditionally or normally acceptable by the California Office of Planning and Research.35 Therefore, the project would not result in the exposure of residents or those working in the project area to excessive noise levels from a private airstrip or public airport. The project is also not an air travel-related use and would thus not add to air travel noise in the surrounding area. Therefore, the project would have no impact with regard to this issue.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 34 Los Angeles County, Airport Land Use Commission, Long Beach Airport, Airport Influence Area, May 13, 2003, accessed on August 12, 2021 at https://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/aluc_airport-long-beach.pdf. 35 Quoted in City of Long Beach, Development Services, Noise Element: City of Long Beach General Plan Draft, December 2019.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 67 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING.
Would the project:
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth
in an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
Impact Analysis
a. Less than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant environmental impact if it would induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly.
The proposed project is an infill development that will not result in new or expanded infrastructure. The project would add 60 units and an estimated 20 jobs according to the applicant, with the potential to add perhaps up to 15 more depending on the uses located on the ground floor (estimated at 4-10 employees for the commercial suites and 3-5 for the public facilities). The number of jobs available is not large enough to induce substantial numbers of new people to move to the City or region. Paramount is a small city surrounded by many other cities, part of the Greater Los Angeles metro region that has a combined population of 18.7 million people. The jobs created by the project are not on a scale that could substantially influence economic or demographic trends in the area. The City is currently in the process of updating the housing element of its general plan as required every eight years by state law. The process requires the City to plan for the accommodation of new housing in an amount determined in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process. The City has been allocated 364 housing units and the City must prove that it has adequate capacity for that number units or substantive plans to accommodate them. According to the City’s draft 2021-2029 Housing Element accounting for approved and proposed projects, plus available capacity under current zoning, the City misses the unit goal by 138 units. By adding 60 units of housing the project will significantly help the City meet its required housing needs, and therefore would not have a negative impact regarding population growth. Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. No Impact. A project could have a significant environmental impact if it would result in the displacement of existing housing units or people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.
The project site does not currently contain any housing and development of the site will not displace any housing units or people. There would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 68 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES.
Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of new
or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks?
e. Other public facilities?
Impact Analysis
a-b. Less Than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant environmental impact if it would require the addition of a new fire or police stations, or the expansion, consolidation, or relocation of an existing facility to maintain acceptable service ratios, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts.
The City is served by the Los Angeles County Fire Department and Sheriff’s Department. Fire Station 31 is less than 1.5 driving miles northwest of the project site. The Paramount Sheriff Station is one mile north of the project site. The site is currently occupied by structures built between 1928 and 1960. The project will replace the existing structures with a single new structure. The proposed building will be larger than the combined previous buildings, but must meet existing fire safety codes, which are much stricter and more comprehensive than the codes under which the previous structures were built. The current standards will require the proposed building will to have fire sprinklers throughout. The result will be the new structure will be significantly more fire safe than the previous structures and therefore will not be more of a burden on fire services relative to the previous uses. The project will create homes for senior people which could increase the need for paramedic services, however with only 60 units the potential need would be incremental and intermittent, and as the added units are within the RHNA projections for the City, would be within the City’s population projections and thus not require new personnel or new facilities. The project also will not introduce a significant new locus for crime as the number of residential units is small and the senior living facility will not be accessible to the general public.
Therefore, the redevelopment of the project site would present a minimal increase in demand for fire and police protection services and would not place an unanticipated burden such that new or expanded fire or police facilities would be needed. Project impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 69 November 2022
c. No Impact. A project could have a significant environmental impact if it would require new or expanded school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, to maintain acceptable performance levels.
The project would provide homes for senior citizens and there will be no children living in it. Also, the scale of the project is such that it would not induce substantial population growth that could result in a significant amount of new children in the area. There would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d-e. Less Than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant environmental impact if it would require new or expanded parks or other public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to accommodate a population increase resulting from the project.
The scale of the project would represent a minor increase in population, assuming all of the residents of the project came from outside of the City or area, which is unlikely. Nonetheless, such a minor increase in the local population of senior people would not require the expansion of public facilities to accommodate them.
In addition, the project will be required to pay impact fees assessed by the City that address incremental increases in housing units. What incremental impacts the project may have on public services can be addressed by such fees and would not require the construction of new facilities or the expansion of existing facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 70 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XVI. RECREATION.
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
Impact Analysis
a-b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project increased the use of recreational facilities to the point of damaging them, or included the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, the activities of which had an adverse effect on the environment.
As discussed above under Section XIV, Population and Housing, the project would not generate a significant increase in population growth. Also, the project would provide housing to senior citizens who would be more likely to pursue low-impact recreational activities. Given the small number of senior residents and likely low-impact nature of park use by these residents, it would not be reasonable to suggest the project could increase the use of recreational facilities to the point that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated. In addition, the project does not include any recreational facilities or require the construction of facilities that would have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 71 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XVII. TRANSPORTATION.
Would the project:
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent
with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,
subdivision (b)?
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?
Impact Analysis
a. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including mass transit roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
The City’s General Plan, Transportation Element has four stated objectives:
• The maintenance and improvement of the roadway system in the City to accommodate future traffic;
• The use of innovative circulation strategies designed to create a transportation system that is sensitive to the City’s aims for continued economic development; • The development of a roadway and circulation network that promotes pedestrian activity in selected areas of the City; and
• The efficient use of alternative forms of transportation that serve the City.
Policies serving those objectives primarily focus on actions to be taken by the City. Policies that are applicable to individual projects restate regulatory requirements such as the payment of impact fees and provision of parking, which the proposed project will be required to abide to. The Element notes that new development should be required to produce a traffic study if it is expected to generate more than 500 new trips a day. The project’s estimated trip generation is detailed in Table XVII-1, Estimated Trip Generation. The trip estimate for the senior living facility includes all of the components that make up the facility, this includes office space for employees and resident-only amenities. The public facilities - chapel, first floor kitchen/dining area, classrooms - are unlikely to be consistently used on a daily basis, but are assessed as such to calculate a worst-case scenario in terms of daily traffic. The trip generation rate calculated for the retail suites is likely conservative as well, regardless of the future uses the suites will host.
The estimates below do not include a credit for prior traffic generation.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 72 November 2022
Table XVII-1
Estimated Trip Generation
Use Units Rate Daily Trips
Assisted Living Facility1 91 beds 2.6 per bed 237
Independent Living
Units2
7 units 2.02 per unit 14
Chapel3 1,014 sf 6.95 per 1,000 sf 7
Public Facilities4 2,752 sf 28.82 per 1,000 sf 81
Retail Suites5 2,657 sf 37.75 per 1,000 sf 102
Total 441 1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation 10th Edition, 2017 – Code 254 Assisted Living: 2.6 trips/bed. 2 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation 10th Edition, 2017 – Code 253 Congregate Care Facility: 2.02 trips/bed. 3 ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition, 2017 - Code 560 Church: 6.95 trips/1,000 sf. 4 ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition, 2017 - Code 495 Recreational Community Center: 28.82 trips/1,000 sf. Kitchen not included as it would only be used to serve the multi-purpose room, classrooms, or chapel, and would not be a source of trip generation itself. 5 ITE Trip Generation 10th Edition, 2017 - Code 820 Shopping Center: 37.75 trips/1,000 sf.
The previous uses, the church and facilities, auto repair garage, and bar, all generated auto trips while in operation. Those trips serve as the baseline for the changes in traffic generation that will result from the proposed project. However, as the table illustrates daily trips generated by the project fall below the 500 trip threshold for a traffic study even without factoring in credit for the previous uses. The projected number of trips can easily be accommodated by the existing roadway network, and because the project will be required to abide by zoning requirements regarding auto and bicycle parking, and requirements for any necessary improvements in the public right-of-way to accommodate the facility, the project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. b. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Section 15064.3 subdivision (b). SB 743 was enacted in September 2013 and fully implemented July 1, 2020, changing the way transportation impact analysis is conducted under CEQA.
These changes include that auto delay, Level of Service, and similar measurements of vehicular roadway capacity and traffic congestion, be replaced with an analysis of VMT as the basis for determining significant traffic impacts under CEQA.
The project would add 60 housing units to an urban infill site, and as a senior living facility the residents will not be commuting for employment. Employees of the facility will commute to the site for employment, but the number of employees is fairly small (up to 20 staff for the senior living facility and up to 15 additional employees for the commercial and public uses). Further, CEQA Section 15064.3(b)1 states that projects within 0.5 miles of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high quality transit corridor should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. The project site is adjacent to a bus stop for Metro route 265, and within 0.5 miles of Metro bus route 258 and 128, as well as Long Beach Transit routes 21A and 21B. Routes 265 and 258 both connect to the Metro Green Line approximately two miles to the north, which connects to multiple other Metro facilities. Given the relatively low number of commuters that will be associated with the project, and its close proximity to active Metro lines, the Project’s impact to VMT would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 73 November 2022
c. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or introduce incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment) on the site.
The placement of the curb on Paramount Blvd and 70th Street will remain unchanged, though the existing curb aprons on Paramount Blvd will be removed, and the apron on 70th Street replaced. Ingress and egress for the facility will be accommodated by one entrance on the alley and one on 70th Street, all of which will be designed in accordance with Public Works standards. There will be no other changes to the public rightsof-way, and the project does not introduce any unusual design elements that violate City standards.
Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible uses and impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. No Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would result in inadequate emergency access.
The project will be accessible to emergency crews from the parking lot in the parcel to the north, Paramount Blvd, 70th Street, and the public alley at the rear of the site. The five foot wide setback at the north property line will ensure there is access to the north side of the building should the northern parcel be redeveloped.
The proposed building will not encroach into Paramount Blvd or the alley nor interfere with them in any manner. Therefore, the project would not result in inadequate emergency access to itself or inadequate access to adjacent public rights-of-way for emergency purposes, and there would be no impacts.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 74 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change
in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is
geographically defined in terms of the size and scope
of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that
is:
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California
Native American tribe.
Impact Analysis
a. Less Than Significant Impact. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
As discussed above in Section V, Cultural Resources, the Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the project site found no record of cultural resources within the site or surrounding buffer area. The assessment also requested NAHC review of the Sacred Lands File which returned a negative result.
As specified in AB 52, lead agencies must provide notice inviting consultation to California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project if the Tribe has submitted a request in writing to be notified of proposed projects. The Tribe must respond in writing within 30 days of the City’s AB 52 notice. The City has provided such notice in conformance with the tribal consultation requirements of AB 52 by letter dated July 29, 2022. Representatives of the following Tribal Groups responded to request consultation pursuant to AB 52:
• Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation
As Lead Agency for the Project, the City must determine whether substantial evidence exists, from the documents provided as part of AB 52 consultation, for a tribal cultural resource to be located on the project site. Following consultation the City concluded there is insufficient site-specific evidence of known tribal
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 75 November 2022
cultural resources occurring within the project site and therefore, based upon the lack of evidence of project impacts on a landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that is listed or eligible for listing, impacts would be less than significant.
This does not preclude the possibility that unknown resources may exist on the Project Site and be uncovered during ground-disturbing activities, and that potential is addressed below in XVIII.b, below. b. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe?
As discussed above, there is insufficient evidence to suggest the project site may contain known tribal resources, however, there is the potential that previously undiscovered cultural resources could be uncovered during ground-disturbing activities. Consultation with the Gabrieleño Band of Mission IndiansKizh Nation concluded with both parties in agreement to include a mitigation measure to avoid or mitigate any potential significant effects to any unknown tribal cultural resources the tribe believes may be present on the site.
As such, a Mitigation Measure TCR-1 is applied to the project which will require a monitor on site during excavation activities. Incorporation of the mitigation measure will reduce the project’s potential to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the PRC, Section 5024.1, to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measures:
MM TCR-1: Tribal Cultural Resource Monitoring
1. Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal Monitor/Consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the Project location. This list is provided by the NAHC.
The Tribal Monitor/Consultant will only be present on-site during ground disturbing activities.
Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching within the Project area.
The Tribal Monitor/Consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. Work will be allowed to continue with monitoring provided by a qualified Kizh Nation Resource Management (KNRM) archaeologist if the Tribal Monitor/Consultant is unavailable and as approved by the Tribal Government. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and Monitor/Consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.
2. Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural or Archaeological Resources Procedures: Upon discovery of any tribal cultural or archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All tribal cultural and archaeological resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal Monitor/Consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 76 November 2022
Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request preservation in place or recovery for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project while evaluation and, if necessary, additional protective mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 77 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
Would the project:
a. Require or result in the relocation or
construction of new or expanded water,
wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction
or relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry, and multiple
dry years?
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider, which serves or may serve
the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the
attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e. Comply with federal, State, and local
management and reduction statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
Impact Analysis
a. Less than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant impact if it would require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.
As a small-scale infill development in an area already served by all utilities and facilities, the project would not require nor result in the relocation or substantial expansion of service infrastructure. As urban infill, the project would generate at most a marginal net increase in the demand for electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities relative to existing demand. These demands can be met from existing facilities and existing utility rights-of-way and will not require the relocation or construction of new facilities beyond the new site connections that will be required. Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 78 November 2022
b. Less than Significant Impact. A project could have a significant impact if there were not sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years.
The City’s Water Division provides water services to the site. The City procures water from groundwater wells withdrawing from the Central Subbasin, and water (both potable and recycled) imported from the Central Basin Municipal Water District (CBMWD), which receives the majority of its water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), which obtains its water from the State Water Project and the Colorado River Aqueduct. The Central Subbasin is adjudicated, meaning the amount that can be extracted is fixed among those entities that have extraction rights, and the amount allocated to each user will likely never increase.
The City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) analyzes the reliability of its water sources over 25 years including multiple dry year scenarios. The amount of water available from the Subbasin is fixed and is considered reliable for future projections, the amount of water obtained from the CBMWD is considered reliable as well, as the MWD has projected demand and availability over the next 25 years (including multiple dry years) and determined reliability over that time frame. The City estimates that demand is projected to be less than total available supply from existing sources through to the year 2040 in a 4 year multiple dry year scenario, but encounter minor shortfalls in a 5 year multiple dry year scenario in 2035 and 2040.36 These shortfalls are anticipated to be manageable through conservation measures allowed per City Ordinance 1050 should they be necessary.
The UWMP assumes a population growth of 0.47 percent a year for a population of 61,266 in the year 2040 (the UWMP uses 55,461 as the population for 2020, the 2020 census counts 53,733 persons37). The proposed project will add 60 units which may house up to 105 people. Although occupants may come from the local population and would be within the RHNA and population projections for the City (see XIV, Population and Housing), if all 105 came from elsewhere the increase in population would be within growth estimates made in the UWMP.
The total estimated increase in water demand per day of 7,325.9 gallons is somewhat conservative because the community room will likely only be used intermittently. The estimated increase amounts to 8.2 acrefeet of water a year. According to the UWMP the City consumed 5,427 acre-feet of water in 2020. The increase in demand then would be a small fraction of one percent (0.15) increase over total water deliveries in 2020, and just 0.14 percent of the projected 2025 demand of 5,955 acre-feet. This increase in water usage is well within the City’s projected water availability estimates. Because the increase is factored into the City’s water planning, the project’s potential to result in a substantial environmental impact due to insufficient water supplies would be less than significant. 36 City of Paramount 2020 Urban Water Management Plan 37 U.S. Census Bureau, 2020 Census of Population and Housing, Paramount city, California, April 1, 2020.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 79 November 2022
The estimated increase in water use at the site is detailed in Table XIX-1, Project Water Demand.
Table XIX-1
Project Water Demand
Previous Use Units or Size Demand Rate per Day* Prior Water Demand per Day
Chapel 168 seats
(28 pews, 6 people per pew)
3.6 gal per fixed seat 604.8 gal
Preschool 30 students (estimated) 10.8 gal per student 324 gal Auto Repair Garage 2,200 sf 60 gal per 1,000 sf1 132 gal Bar 2,500 sf 864 gal per 1,000 sf2 2,160 gal
Total prior water demand per day 3,220.8 gallons
Proposed Use Units or Size Demand Rate per Day Proposed Water Demand per Day
Single unit 15 units 84 gal per unit3 1,260 gal
Double unit/Independent unit 45 units 168 gal per unit3 7,560 gal Community Dining 1,764 sf 420 gal per 1,0004 741 gal
Classrooms 49 Students(a) 13.2 gal per student 646.8 gal Chapel 72 seats 3.6 gal per fixed seat5 259.2 gal
Retail suites 2,657 sf 30 gal per 1,000 sf6 79.7 gal
Total proposed water demand per day 10,546.7 gallons
Estimated increase in water demand per day 7,325.9 gallons *All rates derived from the City of L.A. Bureau of Engineering Sewage Generation Factor chart, April 6, 2012. Water consumption figured at 120% of sewage generation rate.
(a) Max capacity at 20 sf per person 1 Calculated at Machine Shop rate 2 Calculated at Bar: Cocktail, Public Table Area 3 Calculated at Rest Home rate, includes water use of entire facility 4 Calculated at Banquet Room rate and includes use of kitchen 5 Calculated at Chapel rate, assuming 14 square-feet per person for occupancy (twice the 7 sf minimum for assembly use without fixed seats in the International Building Code). 6 Calculated at Retail Area < 100,000 sf rate.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. c. Less than Significant Impact. The project may have a significant impact if it would result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that it does not have adequate capacity to serve the project in addition to the provider’s existing commitments.
The City relies on sewer service from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and is within District No. 2, which participates in the Joint Outfall System that serves 73 cities in the County. According to the Districts the City’s wastewater is directed to the Joint Water Pollution Control Plant (JWPCP) in the City of Carson38 The JWPCP currently treats approximately 260 million gallons of wastewater per day (mgd), with a total capacity of 400 mgd.39 Table XIX-2, Project Wastewater Generation per Day, illustrates estimated wastewater generation for the project.
38 L.A. County Sanitation Districts, Facilities map, accessed January 25, 2022 39 L.A. County Sanitation Districts, Joint Water Pollution Control Plant information page, accessed January 25, 2022 at:
https://www.lacsd.org/services/wastewater-sewage/facilities/joint-water-pollution-control-plant
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 80 November 2022
Table XIX-2
Project Wastewater Generation per Day
Previous Use Units or Size Generation Rate
per Day*
Prior Wastewater Generation
per Day
Chapel 168 seats (28 pews,
6 people per pew)
3 gal per fixed seat 504 gal
Preschool 30 students
(estimated)
9 gal per student 270 gal
Auto Repair Garage 2,200 sf 50 gal per 1,000 sf 110 gal Bar 2,500 sf 720 gal per 1,000 sf 1,800 gal
Total prior wastewater generation per day 2,684 gallons Proposed Use Units or Size Generation Rate
per Day
Proposed Wastewater
Generation per Day
Single unit 15 units 70 gal per unit 1,050 gal
Double unit/Independent unit 45 units 140 gal per unit 6,300 gal Community Dining 1,764 sf 350 gal per 1,000 617.4 gal
Classrooms 49 Students 11 gal per student 539 gal
Chapel 72 seats 3 gal per fixed seat 216 gal
Retail suites 2,657 sf 25 gal per 1,000 sf 66.4 gal
Total proposed wastewater generation per day 8,788.8 gallons Estimated increase in wastewater generation per day 6,104.8 gallons *All rates derived from the City of L.A. Bureau of Engineering Sewage Generation Factor chart, April 6, 2012.
The total conservatively estimated increase in wastewater generation per day of 6,104.8 gallons would be
0.004 percent of the unused daily treatment capacity (140 mgd) of the JWPCP. Therefore, there would be adequate treatment capacity for the project and impacts to capacity would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. d. Less than Significant Impact. The project may have a significant impact if would generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals.
Waste collection services in the City are provided by CalMet Services, Inc. Solid waste generated by the project is subject to certain State requirements for waste diversion and separation. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 has been followed by a series of assembly bills including AB 341, AB 1826, and AB 876, which results in the facility being required to separate recyclables and organic waste, such as food waste, compostable paper, and landscape waste, so that they will be diverted from landfills and directed to recycling or composting facilities. This is to meet the State requirement to divert 50 percent of solid waste away from landfills. Waste service providers either provide various bins for separation at the source, or direct waste to sorting facilities, or a combination of both depending on circumstances. Waste that isn’t diverted is directed to one or more landfills. The estimated solid waste generation rates for the project are detailed below in Table XIX-3, Operational Solid Waste Generation.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 81 November 2022
Table XIX-3
Operational Solid Waste Generation
Previous Use Units or Size Generation Rate per
Day
Previous Solid Waste
Generation per Day
Chapel 4,600 sf 0.007 lbs per sf 32.2 lbs
Preschool 30 students (estimated) 1 lbs per student 30 lbs Auto Repair Garage 2,200 sf 0.9 lbs per 100 sf 19.8 lbs Bar 143 people1 1 lbs per person 143 lbs
Total prior solid waste generation per day 225 lbs
Proposed Use Units or Size Generation Rate per
Day
Proposed Solid Waste
Generation per Day
Single units 15 units 5 lbs per unit 75 lbs
Double unit/Independent unit 45 units 10 lbs per unit 450 lbs Community Dining 130 people 1 lbs per person 130 lbs
Classrooms 49 Students 1 lbs per student 49 lbs
Chapel 1,014 sf 0.007 lbs per sf 7.1 lbs
Retail suites 2,657 sf 2.5 lbs per 1,000 sf 6.6 lbs
Total Operations Solid Waste Generation per day 718 lbs Total increase in solid waste generation per day 493 lbs Source: Rates used reflect an average or best match of sample rates available from the CalRecycle Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, located at: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates 1 Assuming 2,000 square-feet for patrons at 14 square-feet per person.
The total estimated solid waste generated per day is 718 pounds, which is 493 pounds more than the previous uses. This is a conservative estimate as the community dining facility, classrooms, and chapel would not be used to capacity on a daily basis. Assuming a 50 percent diversion rate, a total of 246.5 pounds per day of solid waste would be destined for landfills, an increase of 134 pounds over the previous uses.
This waste could potentially be directed to the Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (SERRF) for incineration in Long Beach, the Sunshine Canyon landfill in Sylmar, or possibly the Olinda Alpha landfill in Brea. According to the County, the SERRF has a daily permitted capacity of 2,240 tons and currently receives approximately 1,218 tons a day. 40 Sunshine Canyon has the capacity to accept 12,100 tons a day but receives 7,420 tons, and is projected to remain operational for 17 more years. According to Orange County Waste and Recycling the Olinda Alpha landfill is permitted to receive 8,000 tons per day, but only receives on average 7,000 tons per day, and is projected to remain operational until 2030.41 The project is located on an existing collection route and no changes to local service would be necessary to accommodate it. The refuse that will be generated by the project would amount to a small fraction of a percent increase to the waste accepted at any of the available disposal facilities, and therefore would not overwhelm the capacity of available facilities. Each available facility has more than enough capacity to accept the extra waste generated by the project.
The California Green Building Standards code requires that 65 percent of refuse generated from construction activities is diverted from landfills. To comply with this requirement Chapter 33 of the Paramount Municipal code requires projects to complete a Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion Plan which details the means and methods by which the project will achieve waste diversion goals.
Compliance is monitored by the City, and waste that is ultimately directed to landfills would not be enough to overwhelm available facilities, as demonstrated above. Therefore, the project’s impact on solid waste facilities, infrastructure, standards or goals, would be less than significant with regulatory compliance. 40 Los Angeles County Public Works, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan 2020 Annual Report, October 2021. 41 Orange County, Waste and Recycling, accessed June 10, 2022 at: https://oclandfills.com/landfills/olinda-landfill.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 82 November 2022
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures would be required. e. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would generate solid waste that was not disposed of in accordance with applicable regulations.
The proposed project would generate solid waste that is typical of residential and office uses, and disposal through a professional waste collection service such as CalMet Services would routinely comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, statutes, and ordinances regarding the proper disposal of solid waste. Impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 83 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
XX. WILDFIRE.
If located in or near state responsibility areas or land classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,
would the project:
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factor,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
c. Require the installation of associated
infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to
the environment?
d. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
Impact Analysis
a-d. No Impact.
Wildfire is fire associated with undeveloped spaces and wild growing vegetation. The project site is located within an urbanized area that has been fully developed for decades, and there are no large undeveloped wildland areas near the it. The project site is not located within or near an existing or proposed State Responsibility Area (SRA)42 or land classified as a VHFHSZ.43 The nearest such areas are a VHFHSZ on the Palos Verdes peninsula and another just west of the City of Whittier, both roughly 11 miles away.
Because the project site is not located in or near any SRAs or land classified as VHFHSZ, and not near any expanses of open space or wildlands, there would be no impacts in relation to wildfire.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required. 42 Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, State Responsibility Area Viewer, Accessed on July 6, 2021 at:
https://bof.fire.ca.gov/projects-and-programs/state-responsibility-area-viewer/. 43 CalFire, FRAP, FHSZ Viewer, Accessed on July 6, 2021 at: https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 84 November 2022
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
a. Does the project have the potential to
substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable”
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects
of probable future projects).
c. Does the project have environmental effects that
cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Impact Analysis
a. Less Than Significant Impact. For the purpose of this analysis, a significant impact could occur if a project would significantly degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, beyond the impacts identified in earlier sections of this analysis.
As discussed above in Section IV. Biological Resources, the project site is located within an urbanized area that has been fully developed for decades. The project would not eliminate a plant or animal community or restrict the range of any plant or animal. As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, the project development would not eliminate any known important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, and it would not eliminate any unknown important examples of California prehistory through required compliance with regulatory requirements. Impacts would be less than significant and no additional mitigation measures are required.
Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.
4.0 INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 85 November 2022
b. Less Than Significant Impact. For the purpose of this analysis, a significant impact could occur if a project, in conjunction with other projects in the vicinity, would result in impacts that would be less than significant when viewed separately, but would be significant when viewed together.
The project is within an urbanized area of the City and would construct an eldercare facility on an infill site occupied by previous uses. As discussed in Section XIV, the scale of the Project is such that it would not significantly impact projected growth of the City, and as such it would not be anticipated to result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to regional impacts that could cause an adverse physical change in the environment. As concluded in this analysis, the project’s incremental contribution to each evaluated issue would be less than significant, mitigated to less than significant, or would have no impact. As such, the project’s contribution to cumulative impacts would be less than significant and no additional mitigation measures are required.
Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. c. Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if a project would have environmental effects that cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
As discussed in the preceding analysis, the project would create 60 senior living housing units and commercial and public ground floor uses in a developed urban area and would not produce any significant impacts upon the environment that cannot be mitigated. All relevant aspects of the project have been analyzed and there is no substantial evidence that the project would have environmental effects that cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.
5.0 REFERENCES
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 86 November 2022
5.0 REFERENCES
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Noise Map, 2018 road data, accessed at:
https://maps.dot.gov/BTS/NationalTransportationNoiseMap/ Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, State Responsibility Area Viewer, Accessed on June 18, 2020 at:
https://bof.fire.ca.gov/projects-and-programs/state-responsibility-area-viewer/.
California Air Resources Board. “Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective,” April 2005. Accessed at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/landuse.htm.
California Code of Regulations, Section 15364.5, Article 20, Definitions.
California Code of Regulations, Section 2485, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling.
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15000 et seq., (State CEQA Guidelines).
California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection, Los Angeles County Important Farmland 2016. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2016/los16.pdf.
California Department of Conservation, Special Report 143, Plate 2.6, Generalize Aggregate Resource Classification Map, 1979.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS), data as of June 22, 2020.
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, Commercial Sector Generation Rates, accessed at https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates#Commercial on June 19, 2020.
California Energy Commission, California Gasoline Data, Facts, and Statistics, Accessed September 17, 2019 at: https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/gasoline/.
California Energy Commission, Diesel Fuel Data, Facts, and Statistics, Accessed September 17, 2019 at:
https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/transportation_data/diesel.html.
California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese List Data Resources, Accessed on June 22, 2020 at:
https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/.
California Legislative Information, accessed at: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_display Section.xhtml?lawCode=PRC§ionNum=21074 on August 4, 2020.
California Public Resources Code, Division 13, Environmental Quality, Section 21000 et seq., California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15000 et seq., (State CEQA Guidelines).
City of Long Beach, Development Services, Planning Bureau, Historic Preservation: Historic Context Statement, July 10, 2009.
5.0 REFERENCES
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 87 November 2022
City of Long Beach Municipal Code Chapter 18.75.080 - Erosion control.
County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan 2018 Annual Report (December 2019), Appendix E-2, Table 4.
6.0 PREPARERS
Paramount UMC Mixed-Use Senior Assisted Living Facility Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Paramount 88 November 2022
6.0 PREPARERS
Envicom Corporation
4165 E. Thousand Oaks Boulevard, Suite 290
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Contributing Staff:
Ms. Laura Kaufman, Vice President, Environmental Services Mr. Tim Rosenstein, Project Manager (Project Manager for the MND) Mr. Dan Kaufman, Environmental Planner
Mr. Chris Boyte, Manager, GIS
Ms. Renee Mauro, Office Manager
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 1
CEQA ADDENDUM
TO: Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder FROM: City of Paramount County Clerk Main Office 16400 Colorado Ave.
12400 Imperial Highway Paramount, California 90723
Norwalk, California 90650
NAME: Gold Key Development Addendum to General Plan Amendment (GPA) 25-2, Zone Change No. 252, Tentative Tract Map No. 084854, and Development Review Application (DRA) No. 25:004.
ADDRESS: 16635, 16675, & 16683 Paramount Boulevard, Paramount, California 90723 CITY/COUNTY: City of Paramount, Los Angeles County.
APPLICANT: Gold Key Development, Inc. 5732 Engineer Drive, Suite 102, Huntington Beach, California 92649 PROJECT: The City of Paramount is reviewing an application to construct seventeen, single-family residential units on 1.o4-acre property located west of Paramount Boulevard between Harrison Street and 70th Street. The new development would consist of the following elements:
Site Plan. The proposed development would involve the construction of seventeen, single-family, detached residential units. The new residential units would range in size from approximately 1,707 square feet to approximately 1,860 square feet. Three housing types are proposed and are referred to as Plan A, Plan B, and Plan C. The overall development density would be 16.3 units per acre. The units would be arranged linearly, with the garages facing the alleyway towards the west and the building frontages facing the east towards Paramount Boulevard.
Residential Unit Plan A. Plan A would have a total building floor area of approximately 1,860 square feet including 4 bedrooms and 2 ½ bathrooms. A total of 9 units would be Plan A units. The Plan A units would be market rate units. The units would be two levels with a maximum height of 26 feet. Each unit would be provided with a two-car garage. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron.
Residential Unit Plan B. Plan B would have a total building floor area of approximately 1,725 square feet and would include 3 bedrooms and 2 ½ bathrooms. A total of 5 units would be Plan B units. The Plan B units would be market rate units. The units would be two levels with a maximum height of 26 feet. Each unit would be provided with a two-car garage. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron.
Residential Unit Plan C. Plan C would have a total building floor area of approximately 1,707 square feet including 3 bedrooms and 2 ½ bathrooms. A total of 3 units would be Plan C units. The Plan C units would be affordable units. The units would consist of two levels with a maximum height of 26 feet. Each unit would be provided with a two-car garage. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron.
Parking and Access. Each unit would be provided with a two-car garage. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron. Vehicular access to the project would be provided by an existing alley located west of the project site while pedestrian access would be provided by a pedestrian walkway located to the east of the site along through Paramount Boulevard.
All of the relevant conditions and mitigation measures from the previously approved DRA No. 25:004, GPA 22-1, and ZC No. 239 would be applied to the modified project as deemed appropriate by the City Planning Commission.
CITY CONTACT Monica Rodriguez, Assistant Planning and Building Director City of Paramount Planning Division
16400 Colorado Avenue
Paramount, California 90723
Signature Date
EXHIBIT A
Attachment 2
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 2
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 3
CEQA ADDENDUM
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
CEQA ADDENDUM TO GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO.
084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
16635 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD
PARAMOUNT, CALIFORNIA 90723
LEAD AGENCY:
CITY OF PARAMOUNT
PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
16400 COLORADO AVENUE
PARAMOUNT, CALIFORNIA 90723
REPORT PREPARED BY:
BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
2211 S. HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107
HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745
JULY 2025
PARA 113
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 4
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................7
2. CEQA AUTHORITY FOR AN ADDENDUM.........................................................................................................7
3. PROJECT LOCATION & ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.........................................................................................8
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................................9 Exhibit 1 Regional Map ............................................................................................................................11 Exhibit 2 Citywide Map ........................................................................................................................... 12 Exhibit 3 Vicinity Map............................................................................................................................. 13 Exhibit 4 Aerial Photograph ................................................................................................................... 14 Exhibit 5 Site Plan .................................................................................................................................... 15
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS......................................................................................................................... 16
5.1 AESTHETICS ............................................................................................................................................... 16
5.2 AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES.................................................................................................... 18
5.3 AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................................................................ 20
5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...........................................................................................................................23
5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................................................27
5.6 ENERGY.................................................................................................................................................... 30
5.7 GEOLOGY & SOILS......................................................................................................................................32
5.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS...................................................................................................................35 Table 5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory ......................................................................................35
5.9 HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................................................................37
5.10 HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY............................................................................................................. 40
5.11 LAND USE & PLANNING............................................................................................................................44
5.12 MINERAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................................................46
5.13 NOISE ......................................................................................................................................................46 Table 6 Construction Noise .................................................................................................................... 48 Table 7 Common Effects of Construction Vibration..............................................................................49 Table 8 Vibration Source Levels for Typical Construction Equipment ...............................................50
5.14 POPULATION & HOUSING.........................................................................................................................52
5.15 PUBLIC SERVICES .....................................................................................................................................54
5.16 RECREATION............................................................................................................................................57
5.17 TRANSPORTATION ....................................................................................................................................58 Table 9 Project Trip Generation .............................................................................................................58
5.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES................................................................................................................ 61
5.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................63 Table 10 Wastewater (Effluent) Generation (gals/day).......................................................................64 Table 11 Water Consumption (gals/day) ...............................................................................................65 Table 12 Solid Waste Generation (lbs./day) ..........................................................................................66
5.20 WILDFIRE ...............................................................................................................................................67 SECTION 6. CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................................................................................70
6.1 FINDINGS...................................................................................................................................................70
7. REFERENCES................................................................................................................................................72
7.1 PREPARERS ................................................................................................................................................72
7.2 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................................................72
APPENDICES (SEPARATE COVER)
APPENDIX A – AIR QUALITY CALEEMOD WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX B – UTILITIES WORKSHEETS
APPENDIX C – MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 6
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 7
1. INTRODUCTION
The proposed “project” that is the subject of this Addendum would involve the construction of seventeen (17) single-family residential units on a 1.04-acre property located west of Paramount Boulevard. The project site was originally part of a senior-living development which included three project parcels. In 2022, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment (GPA) 22-1 and Zone Change No. 239. In 2023, the Planning Commission approved Development Review Application (DRA) No. 22:001. The project site is comprised of three parcels. The parcel addressed 16635 Paramount Boulevard is currently vacant and was formerly occupied by a church facility. The two parcels to the south (16675 and 16683 Paramount Boulevard) are currently developed with commercial uses, formerly occupied by a restaurant and auto repair. The new residential units would range in size from approximately 1,707 square feet to approximately 1,860 square feet. Three housing floor plans are referred to as Plan A, Plan B, and Plan C. The overall development density would be 16.3 In 2023, the Planning Commission approved Development Review Application (DRA) No. 2:001. units per acre. The units would be arranged linearly, with the garages facing the alleyway towards the west and the building frontages would face the east, towards Paramount Boulevard. The proposed residential development would require a new tentative tract map, a development review application, a zone change to Planned Development with Performance Standards Multi-family Residential (PD-PS) and a general plan amendment to Mixed Use Commercial and Multiple-Family Residential. All of the pertinent and relevant conditions and mitigation measures from DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239 would continue to be applied to the proposed project, where pertinent.
2. CEQA AUTHORITY FOR AN ADDENDUM
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has established the type of environmental documentation that is required when changes to a project occurs after an environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration (MND) has been certified. Specifically, Section 15164(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states that: The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requires a Subsequent EIR or MND when an MND has already been adopted or an EIR has been certified and one or more of the following circumstances exist:
● Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; ● Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or MND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
● New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR or MND was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
- The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or MND or negative declaration;
- Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more than shown in the previous EIR or MND;
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 8
- Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or - Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
California Public Resources Code (CPRC) Section 21166 states that unless one or more of the following events occur, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency:
● Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report;
● Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the EIR or MND; or ● New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the EIR or MND was certified as complete, becomes available.
As demonstrated by the analysis herein, the proposed project would not result in any new additional significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of previously anticipated significant impacts. Rather, all of the impacts associated with the Modified Project are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the Certified EIR or MND and do not constitute a new or substantially increased significant impact.
3. PROJECT LOCATION & ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The proposed project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Paramount. The City of Paramount is located in the southeastern portion of Los Angeles County, approximately 12 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles. The City is bounded by South Gate and Downey on the north; the Los Angeles River, Lynwood, Compton, and unincorporated areas of Rancho Dominguez on the west; Long Beach and Bellflower to the south; and Bellflower and Downey on the east. The project site is located west of Paramount Boulevard between Harrison Street and 70th Street. The project site includes three properties 16635, 16675, and 16683 Paramount Boulevard. 16635 Paramount Boulevard is currently vacant and was formerly occupied by a church facility which has since been demolished. The project site’s addresses include 16635, 16685, and 16683 Paramount Boulevard, Paramount, California 90723. The project site’s current Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) that are assigned to the property includes 7102-03-1024, 7102-030-1020, and 7102-030- 1021. The proposed project site’s latitude and longitude is 33° 52’ 58.08” N; -118° 9’ 37.33” W. The location of the City of Paramount, in a regional context, is shown in Exhibit 1. The project site’s location within the City of Paramount is shown in Exhibit 2 and a vicinity map is provided in Exhibit 3. The project site is located west of Paramount Boulevard between Harrison Street and 70th Street. Two of the project parcels (16675 and 16683 Paramount Boulevard) are currently developed with commercial type uses. The Parcel located at 16635 Paramount Boulevard is currently vacant and was formerly occupied by a church facility which has now been demolished. The parcel located at 16635 Paramount Boulevard is completely paved over except for landscaped areas. Parcels located at 16675 and 16683 Paramount Boulevard are currently developed with commercial buildings. An aerial view of the project area is provided in Exhibit 4. The site plan of the proposed project is shown in Exhibit 5. The land uses and development found within the vicinity of the project area include the following:
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 9
● North of the Project Site. A dual-tenant commercial building abuts the project site on the north side (16601 and 16605 Paramount Boulevard). This property is designated as Area Plan in the City’s General Plan and is zoned General Commercial (C-3).
● South of the Project Site. An auto repair shop (16675 and 16683 Paramount Boulevard) and former restaurant abuts the project site on the south side. This property is designated as Mixed-Use Commercial Residential in the City’s General Plan and is zoned Planned DevelopmentPerformance Standards (PD-PS). The properties to the south would be developed as part 0f the proposed project.
● West of the Project Site. An alleyway extends alongside the west of the project site. Single-family residences (16608 to 16636 Eureka Avenue) are located west of the alley. This area is designated as Single-Family Residential in the City’s General Plan and is zoned Medium Density Residential (R2). ● East of the Project Site. Paramount Boulevard extends along the project site’s east side. A medical office building (16660 Paramount Boulevard) is located further east. This property is designated as Area Plan in the City’s General Plan and is zoned General Commercial (C-3).
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Paramount is reviewing an application to construct seventeen, single-family residential units on a 1.04-acre site. The new development would consist of the following elements:
● Site Plan. The proposed development would involve the construction of seventeen, single-family, detached residential units. The new residential units would range in size from approximately 1,707 square feet to approximately 1,860 square feet. Three housing floor plans are proposed and are referred to as Plan A, Plan B, and Plan C. The overall development density would be 16.3 units per acre. The units would be arranged linearly, with the garages facing the alleyway towards the west and the building frontages would face the east towards Paramount Boulevard. ● Residential Unit Plan A. Plan A would have a total building floor area of approximately 1,860 square feet including 4 bedrooms and 2 ½ bathrooms. A total of 9 units would be Plan A units.
The Plan A units would be market rate units. The units would be two levels with a maximum height of 26 feet. Each unit would be provided a garage that would include 2 enclosed parking spaces. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron.
● Residential Unit Plan B. Plan B would have a total building floor area of approximately 1,725 square feet and would include 3 bedrooms and 2 ½ bathrooms. A total of 5 units would be Plan B units. The Plan B units would be market rate units. The units would be two levels with a maximum height of 26 feet. Each unit would be provided a garage that would include 2 enclosed parking spaces. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron.
● Residential Unit Plan C. Plan C would have a total building floor area of approximately 1,707 square feet including 3 bedrooms and 2 ½ bathrooms. A total of 3 units would be Plan C units.
The Plan C units would be affordable units. The units would consist of two levels with a maximum height of 26 feet. Each unit would be provided a garage that would include 2 enclosed parking spaces. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway apron.
● Parking and Access. Each unit would be provided a garage that would include 2 enclosed parking spaces. Two additional parking spaces for each unit would also be available on the driveway GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 10
apron. Vehicular access to the project would be provided by an existing alley located west of the project site while pedestrian access would be provided by a pedestrian walkway located to the east of the site along through Paramount Boulevard.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 11
EXHIBIT 1 REGIONAL MAP
SOURCE: Q GIS
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 12
EXHIBIT 2 CITYWIDE MAP
SOURCE: Q GIS
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 13
EXHIBIT 3 VICINITY MAP
SOURCE: Q GIS
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 14
EXHIBIT 4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
SOURCE: GOOGLE MAPS
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 15
EXHIBIT 5 SITE PLAN
SOURCE: THOMAS S. RACISZ ARCHITECT
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 16
5. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
5.1 AESTHETICS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?
C. Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project affect a scenic vista? ● No New Impact.
According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) prepared for the previously approved senior living project by Envicom Corporation, there are no scenic vistas visible from the project site and the project site is surrounded on all sides by development. The site has no scenic elements visible and no visual resources to be had from within the project site’s field of vision, therefore the project would have no impact on public views or scenic vistas. The project site is located within the boundaries of the previously approved senior living development. In comparison to the approved senior living development, the proposed units would be two stories instead of three and the number 0f residential units proposed would be reduced from 60 units to 17 single-family units. Both projects are residential land uses however, the intensity and density of the proposed single-family units would be less than the approved living facility. The scale and mass of the proposed single-family units would be smaller than the approved senior living facility and would be compatible with the existing development surrounding the project site. Since the project will not result in a loss in scenic view-sheds the impacts will be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ● No New Impact.
There are no designated State scenic highways located in the vicinity of the project site. The nearest scenic highway is the Pacific Coast Highway which is eligible for scenic designation and is approximately 6.5 miles GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 17
southeast of the project site. The site’s topography was previously modified in order to accommodate the existing church and the adjacent commercial uses. The are no remaining natural rock outcroppings present within the existing project site that will be the location of the new structure. Lastly, there are no historic buildings present on-site. Although on historic context statement and survey had identified properties, a historic preservation ordinance has not been adopted. As a result, No New Impacts to scenic and historic resources are anticipated to occur since there are none present on-site. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. A substantial degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ● No New Impact.
As part of the implementation of the proposed project, the zoning designation would change from Planned Development-Performance Standards Mixed-Use Commercial and Senior Assisted/Independent Living Facility to Planned Development-Performance Standard Multifamily Residential (PD-PS), which aims to regulate the design of a development through the entitlement process rather than specific development standards set within the zoning code. The proposed development would be required to undergo the design process with guidance from City staff, which would ensure the development would be compatible with the character of the existing neighborhood and would be well integrated within its setting. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ● No New Impact
According to the IS/MND prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, the proposed senior living facility would include minimal exterior lighting that is compatible with the existing neighborhood. Since the proposed development would be smaller in scale and size than the approved facility, the light and glare impacts would be less than the already approved facility and would not create light or glare that would affect views in the area. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-2, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
The analysis determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant adverse aesthetic and/or light and glare impacts. As a result, no mitigation is required.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 18
5.2 AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural uses?
B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses, or a Williamson Act Contract?
C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use?
E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? ● No New Impact.
According to the California Department of Conservation, the project site does not contain any areas of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is currently vacant except for the parking and landscaping of the now-demolished church facility. As a result, no impacts would occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act Contract? ● No New Impact.
The project site is currently zoned PD-PS, Planned Development-Performance Standards Mixed-Use Commercial and Senior Assisted/Independent Living Facility. According to the City’s zoning code, agricultural or horticultural growing grounds are not permitted uses within this zone. In addition, according to the California Department of Conservation Division of Land Resource Protection, the project site is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract. As a result, no impacts on existing Williamson Act Contracts will result from the proposed project’s implementation. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 19
Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 4526), or zoned timberland production (as defined by Government Code § 51104[g])? ● No New Impact.
The project site is located in the midst of a larger urban area and no native forest land is located within the City, project site, or in the surrounding properties. The project site is currently vacant and was formerly occupied by a church facility which has now been demolished. As a result, no impacts on forest land or timber resources will result from the implementation of the proposed project. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? ● No New Impact.
No forest lands are located within Paramount or in the vicinity of the project site. As a result, no loss or conversion of forest lands will result from the proposed project’s implementation and no impact will occur.
The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to their location or nature, may result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use? ● No New Impact.
As indicated previously, the project site is currently vacant and was formerly occupied by a church facility which has now been demolished. There are no agricultural uses present on-site or within the adjacent properties. No agricultural uses are located in the vicinity of the site. According to the California Department of Conservation, the project site does not contain any areas of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The entire area is designated as Urban and Built-Up Land. As a result, no impacts associated with the conversion of farmland uses in the area. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
The analysis of agriculture and forestry resources indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 20
5.3 AIR QUALITY
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
New
Impact
A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
B. Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
C. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
D. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? ● No New Impact.
Measures to improve regional air quality are outlined in the SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The most recent AQMP was adopted in 2023 and was jointly prepared with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The primary criteria pollutants that remain non-attainment in the local area include PM2.5 and Ozone. Specific criteria for determining a project’s conformity with the AQMP is defined in Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The Air Quality Handbook refers to the following criteria as a means to determine a project’s conformity with the AQMP:
● Consistency Criteria 1 refers to a proposed project’s potential for resulting in an increase in the frequency or severity of an existing air quality violation or its potential for contributing to the continuation of an existing air quality violation.
● Consistency Criteria 2 refers to a proposed project’s potential for exceeding the assumptions included in the AQMP or other regional growth projections relevant to the AQMP’s implementation.
In terms of Criteria 1, the proposed project’s long-term (operational) airborne emissions will be below levels that the SCAQMD considers to be a significant adverse impact (refer to the analysis included in the next section where the long-term stationary and mobile emissions for the proposed project are summarized. The proposed project will also conform to Consistency Criteria 2 since it will not significantly affect any regional population, housing, and employment projections prepared for the City of Paramount by the SCAG. A general plan amendment and zone change will be required to implement the proposed project however, the proposed project would not exceed regional growth projections as shown in the following analysis. According to the Growth Forecast Appendix prepared by SCAG for the 2024 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the number of households within the City is expected to grow by 400 new homes through 2035. The proposed project would include 17 households, which would not exceed the expected growth. As a result, no impacts related to the implementation of the AQMP will occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 21
the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? ● No New Impact.
According to the IS/MND prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, the approved facility would not exceed any SCAQMD daily emissions thresholds. As previously mentioned, both projects are residential land uses and are similar in nature however, the intensity and density of the proposed 17 single-family units would be less than the approved 60-unit living facility. The proposed single-family units have a total building square footage of 29,739 square feet compared to the senior-living facility which was designed to have a total building square footage of 100,000 square feet. The scale and mass of the proposed single-family project would be smaller than the approved senior living facility. Therefore, both construction and operational emissions would be lower than the senior living facility and the proposed project would not exceed any emissions thresholds. The construction emissions are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions
Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Daily Emissions 1.05 9.22 10.2 0.02 2.17 1.41
Daily Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Significant Impact? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod V.2022.1.1.29
The operational emissions are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Estimated Daily Operational Emissions
Operational Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Daily Emissions 5.32 0.57 5.33 0.02 0.99 0.27
Daily Thresholds 55 100 550 150 150 55
Significant Impact? No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod V.2022.1.1.29
As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? ● No New Impact.
The nearest sensitive receptors to the project include the single-family residences located to the west of the project site. The SCAQMD requires that CEQA air quality analyses indicate whether a proposed project will result in an exceedance of localized emissions thresholds or LSTs. LSTs only apply to short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) emissions at a fixed location and do not include off-site or areawide emissions. As previously mentioned in subsection B, according to the IS/MND prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, the approved facility would not exceed any LSTs. As previously GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 22
mentioned, both projects are residential land uses and are similar in nature however, the intensity and density of the proposed 17 single-family units would be less than the approved 60-unit living facility. The proposed single-family units have a total building square footage of 29,739 square feet compared to the senior-living facility which was designed to have a total building square footage of 100,000 square feet. The scale and mass of the proposed single-family units project would be smaller than the approved senior living facility. Since the same LSTs are used for both projects and the construction and operational emissions would be lower for the proposed 17 single-family units, the proposed project would not exceed any LSTs.
Source: CalEEMod V.2022.1.1.29
As shown in the Table 3, the proposed project would not result in an exceedance in LSTs. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
D. Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? ● No New Impact.
The SCAQMD has identified those land uses that are typically associated with odor complaints. These uses include activities involving livestock, rendering facilities, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting activities, refineries, landfills, and businesses involved in fiberglass molding. The proposed project is a residential use and is not anticipated to create any objectionable odors. As a result, no impacts would occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA NO. 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
The analysis of air quality resources indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.
Table 3 Local Significance Thresholds Exceedance SRA 4 for 1-acre sites Emissions Project Emissions
(lbs/day) Type
Allowable Emissions Threshold (lbs/day) and a
Specified Distance from Receptor (in meters)
25 5o 100 200 500
NO2 1.58/0.57 Construction/Operations 81 83 98 123 192
CO 2.31/5.33 Construction/Operations 485 753 1,128 2,109 6,841 PM10 0.99 Operations 1 3 7 15 38
PM10 0.12 Construction 4 12 28 60 158
PM2.5 0.27 Operations 1 1 2 6 21
PM2.5 0.08 Construction 3 4 9 22 85
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 23
5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
B. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ● No New Impact.
The City of Paramount and the surrounding areas have been fully developed. The majority of the site is vacant and is completely paved over except for landscaping strips along the footprint of the now-demolished church facility. As part of the demolition process, the landscaping found within the strips has been removed and only grass remains. According to the IS/MND prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, a search of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife California Natural Biodiversity Database for the South Gate quadrangle was conducted which would no recordings of any specie-status species since 1956. The approved senior living facility planned to remove a mature Ficus street tree adjacent to the former church facility and replace it with 10 new street trees. This tree was not removed but the applicant intends to replace the tree with at least two to three new trees, and as request by Public Works and according to the site plan, would remain untouched. Due to the surrounding urban development, it is unlikely birds would use the Ficus tree to build a nest. The original Initial Study/Mitigated Negative GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 24
Declaration document included a mitigation measure for nesting birds. Construction of the proposed project and removal of the ficus tree may disturb nesting birds. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would remain:
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Removal of the mature street tree or demolition of the subject property, should take place outside of the nesting bird season, which generally runs from March 1- August 31 (as early as February 1 for raptors) to avoid take (including disturbances which would cause abandonment of active nests containing eggs and/or young). Take means to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt purse, catch, capture or kill (Fish and Game Code Section 86). If project activities cannot feasibly avoid the nesting bird season, beginning thirty days prior to the disturbance of the street tree, the applicant shall: Arrange for weekly bird surveys to detect any protected native birds in the tree to be removed. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist with experience in conducting nesting bird surveys. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis with the last survey being conducted no more than three days prior to the initiation of clearance/construction work. If a nesting bird is found, the applicant shall delay all clearance/construction disturbance activities within 300 feet of suitable nesting habitat for the observed protected bird species (within 500 feet for suitable raptor nesting habitat) until August 31. Alternatively, the Qualified Biologist could continue the surveys in order to locate any nests.
If an active nest is located, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest (within 500 feet for raptor nests), or as determined by the Qualified Biological Monitor, shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting.
Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of the area. The Qualified Biologist shall record the results of the recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable state and federal laws pertaining to the protection of nesting birds. Such record shall be submitted and received into the case file for the associated discretionary action permitting the project.
Adherence to the aforementioned mitigation will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant with mitigation. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ● No New Impact.
A site survey and a review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper indicated that there are no wetlands or riparian habitat present on-site or in the adjacent properties.
In addition, there are no designated “blue line streams” located within the project site. As a result, no impacts on natural or riparian habitats will result from the proposed project’s implementation. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on Federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ● No New Impact.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 25
As indicated in the previous subsection, the project area and adjacent developed properties are developed and do not contain any natural wetland and/or riparian habitat.1 As a result, the proposed project will not impact any protected wetland area or designated blue-line stream. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ● No New Impact.
The proposed project site is vacant and is completely paved over except for landscaping strips along the footprint of the now-demolished church facility. The project site is surrounded on all sides by urbanization.
As a result, no impact to migration corridors will result from the proposed project’s implementation. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ● No New Impact.
The City does not have a protected tree ordinance, or any other similar regulations pertaining to biological resources. No trees are located within the project site and the only remaining vegetation includes grass typical for urban landscaping. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? ● No New Impact.
The project site is not located or part of any draft or adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan. As a result, no impacts will occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
The environmental analysis determined that there may be a potential for nesting birds to be disturbed during construction phases of development. As a result, the following mitigation measure is required:
Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Removal of the mature street tree or demolition of the subject property, should take place outside of the nesting bird season, which generally runs from March 1- August 31 (as GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 26
early as February 1 for raptors) to avoid take (including disturbances which would cause abandonment of active nests containing eggs and/or young). Take means to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt purse, catch, capture or kill (Fish and Game Code Section 86).
If project activities cannot feasibly avoid the nesting bird season, beginning thirty days prior to the disturbance of the street tree, the applicant shall:
1. Arrange for weekly bird surveys to detect any protected native birds in the tree to be removed. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist with experience in conducting nesting bird surveys.
The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis with the last survey being conducted no more than three days prior to the initiation of clearance/construction work.
2. If a nesting bird is found, the applicant shall delay all clearance/construction disturbance activities within 300 feet of suitable nesting habitat for the observed protected bird species (within 500 feet for suitable raptor nesting habitat) until August 31.
3. Alternatively, the Qualified Biologist could continue the surveys in order to locate any nests. If an active nest is located, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest (within 500 feet for raptor nests), or as determined by the Qualified Biological Monitor, shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of the area.
4. The Qualified Biologist shall record the results of the recommended protective measures described above to document compliance with applicable state and federal laws pertaining to the protection of nesting birds. Such record shall be submitted and received into the case file for the associated discretionary action permitting the project.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 27
5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? C. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? ● No New Impact.
According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, a Phase 1 Cultural Resource Assessment of the project site was conducted by Envicom Corporation on June 22, 2022. The assessment found that the church did not qualify as a significant historical resource and found no previously recorded cultural resources within or immediately adjacent to the project site. The proposed project would be limited to within the parcel of the former church building.
The project site has been subject to ground disturbance activities in the past. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? ● No New Impact.
As previously mentioned in subsection A, a Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment conducted on the project site in 2022 found no archeological resources located within the project site or immediately adjacent to it.
Although the project site has been subject to ground disturbance activities in the past, there is potential to uncover previously unidentified archaeological resources during ground-breaking activities. As a result, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would remain:
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: An archaeological monitor that meets the Secretary of Interior qualifications will be on site during grading of the project site from surface to the end of subsurface excavation. The purpose of having an archaeologist on site is to assess if any significant cultural resources are encountered during grading or trenching. If such features or artifact concentrations are identified, then the project “discovery” protocol will be followed:
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 28
1. The archaeological monitor will collect any diagnostic older historical material uncovered through grading that is within a disturbed context, and can halt construction within 30-feet of a potentially significant cultural resource if necessary. Artifacts collected from a disturbed context or that do not warrant additional assessment can be collected without the need to halt grading. Discovery situations that do not lead to further assessment, survey, evaluation, or data recovery can be described in the monitor’s daily logs. However, if foundations, privies, or other older historical features are encountered, the project “discovery” protocol should be followed. A final Monitoring Report will be produced for the project that discusses all monitoring activities and all artifacts recovered and features identified through monitoring of the project site. Discovery situations that do not lead to further assessment, survey, evaluation, or data recovery can be described in the final Monitoring Report.
2. All artifacts recovered that are important, with diagnostic or location information that may be of importance to California history, will be cleaned, analyzed, and described within the Monitoring Report. All materials determined important will be curated at an appropriate depository or returned to the landowner for public display. If important materials are found during monitoring, a Curation Plan may be needed that is reviewed by the Lead Agency prior to the publication of the Monitoring Report. The costs of the Monitoring Report, the Curation Plan, and the processing, analysis, and curation of all artifacts will be the responsibility of the applicant, within the cost parameters outlined under CEQA.
Adherence to the aforementioned mitigation will reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant with mitigation. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? ● No New Impact.
There are no cemeteries present on-site and in the surrounding areas. The site is currently occupied by urban development. In the event that an un-recorded burial is encountered, conformance to the Health and Safety Code § 7050.5 will be required. The Code section requires the project to halt until the County coroner has made the necessary findings as to the origin and disposition of the remains pursuant to Public Resources Code § 5097.98. Should human remains or archaeological resources be encountered, all construction activities must stop and the Los Angeles County Sheriff must be contacted. CEQA Guidelines §15064.5 of CEQA also regulates the identification of significant archaeological resources and their salvage. This section of CEQA, among other things, incorporates provisions previously contained in Appendix K of the Guidelines.
The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 29
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
The environmental analysis determined that there may be a potential for archaeological resources to be uncovered during the ground-disturbing phases of development. As a result, the following mitigation measure is required:
Mitigation Measure CUL-1: An archaeological monitor that meets the Secretary of Interior qualifications will be on site during grading of the project site from surface to the end of subsurface excavation. The purpose of having an archaeologist on site is to assess if any significant cultural resources are encountered during grading or trenching. If such features or artifact concentrations are identified, then the project “discovery” protocol will be followed:
1. The archaeological monitor will collect any diagnostic older historical material uncovered through grading that is within a disturbed context, and can halt construction within 30-feet of a potentially significant cultural resource if necessary. Artifacts collected from a disturbed context or that do not warrant additional assessment can be collected without the need to halt grading. Discovery situations that do not lead to further assessment, survey, evaluation, or data recovery can be described in the monitor’s daily logs. However, if foundations, privies, or other older historical features are encountered, the project “discovery” protocol should be followed. A final Monitoring Report will be produced for the project that discusses all monitoring activities and all artifacts recovered and features identified through monitoring of the project site. Discovery situations that do not lead to further assessment, survey, evaluation, or data recovery can be described in the final Monitoring Report.
2. All artifacts recovered that are important, with diagnostic or location information that may be of importance to California history, will be cleaned, analyzed, and described within the Monitoring Report. All materials determined important will be curated at an appropriate depository or returned to the landowner for public display. If important materials are found during monitoring, a Curation Plan may be needed that is reviewed by the Lead Agency prior to the publication of the Monitoring Report. The costs of the Monitoring Report, the Curation Plan, and the processing, analysis, and curation of all artifacts will be the responsibility of the applicant, within the cost parameters outlined under CEQA.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 30
5.6 ENERGY
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation?
B. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? ● No New Impact.
According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, the approved facility would not exceed any emissions thresholds. As previously mentioned, both projects are residential land uses and are similar in nature however, the intensity and density of the proposed 17 single-family units would be less than the approved 60-unit living facility. The proposed single-family units have a total building square footage of 29,739 square feet compared to the senior-living facility which was designed to have a total building square footage of 100,000 square feet. The scale and mass of the proposed single-family units project would be smaller than the approved senior living facility. Therefore, construction energy usage and operational emissions would be lower than the approved senior living facility. This is further shown in Table 4.
Furthermore, the proposed project would be required to install energy and water efficient fixtures, appliances, lighting, and heating and air conditioning. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
Table 4 Proposed Project’s Energy Consumption
Use Unit Factor Generation
Single-Family Residential
(Proposed) 17 units 5,625 kWh/unit/year 262 kWh/day
Senior Living Facility (Originally Proposed) 1,195.7 kWh/day Difference 748.8 kWh/day
Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 31
B. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? ● No New Impact.
The California Public Utilities Commission prepared an updated Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan in 2011 with the goal of promoting energy efficiency and a reduction in greenhouse gases (GHG). Assembly Bill 1109, which was adopted in 2007, also serves as a framework for lighting efficiency. This bill requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to adopt minimum energy efficiency standards structured to reduce average statewide electrical energy consumption by not less than 50 percent from the 2007 levels for indoor residential lighting and not less than 25 percent from the 2007 levels for indoor commercial and outdoor lighting by 2018. According to the Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, lighting comprises approximately one-fourth of California’s electricity use while non-residential sector exterior lighting (parking lot, area, walkway, and security lighting) usage comprises 1.4 percent of California’s total electricity use, much of which occurs during limited occupancy periods. As indicated in the previous subsection, the project will not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy during installation or operation.
The proposed single-family units would use electrical energy and would be constructed pursuant to current electrical codes, including Title 24 of the State Building Code. Therefore, the proposed project will not conflict with or obstruct the state’s goal of promoting energy and lighting efficiency. As a result, no impacts would occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 2
The analysis of energy resources indicated that no significant adverse impacts would result from the proposed project’s implementation. As a result, no mitigation measures are required.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 32
5.7 GEOLOGY & SOILS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project, directly or indirectly, cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving.
i). Would the project, directly or indirectly, cause rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication
42.
ii). Would the project, directly or indirectly, cause Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii). Would the project, directly or indirectly, cause seismicrelated ground failure, including liquefaction; iv). Would the project, directly or indirectly, cause landslides? B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
C. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
D. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
E. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault (as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault), ground–shaking, liquefaction, or landslides? ● No New Impact.
According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, a Geotechnical Investigation was conducted by Geotechnical Professionals, Inc on April 13, 2022. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, the project site is not located within an AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault zone, and no active or potentially active facts are known to exist within the site. The nearest fault is the Puente Hills fault located approximately 2.1 miles northeast of the site. The project site is located in an area that is subject to liquefaction. A liquefaction analysis was conducted, and the Geotechnical Investigation provides recommendations for structural designs to address liquefaction risk including removal of undocumented fill and additional soil preparation. However, these recommendations are no different than California Building Code standards reiterated by the Investigation. Finally, the project site is not located within a landslide zone since the project site is a flat infill property with little to no slope GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 33
onsite and in the surrounding vicinity. Adherence to the set of mandatory standard conditions set forth by the City will reduce impacts to levels that are less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ● No New Impact.
The project site is underlain by Urban Land-Metz-Pico soils complex. This soil is well drained, negligible runoff, and is not classified as a hydric soil. The Urban Land-Metz-Pico soils complex is suitable for development, as evident by the existing land uses. Therefore, no impacts regarding erosion or the loss of topsoil will occur with the implementation of the proposed project. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including location on a geologic unit or a soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? ● No New Impact.
The project site is underlain by Urban Land-Metz-Pico soils complex. This soil is well drained, negligible runoff, and is not classified as a hydric soil. The Urban Land-Metz-Pico soils complex is suitable for development, as evident by the existing land uses. According to the Geotechnical Investigation, total potential ground settlement was determined to be two to three inches. The site is not located within an area of ground subsidence. With adherence to the recommendations for designing the site to address the liquefaction potential, risks related to lateral spreads and liquefaction are less than significant. As a result, no impacts are anticipated. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
D. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts, including location on expansive soil, as defined in Uniform Building Code (2010), creating substantial risks to life or property? ● No New Impact.
The analysis of expansion potential onsite conducted by the Geotechnical Investigation found expansion potential to be very low. Adherence to the recommendations found within the study would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
E. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts, including soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ● No New Impact.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 34
No septic tanks will be used as part of the future development. The proposed development will be connected to the adjacent sanitary sewer system. As a result, no impacts associated with the use of septic tanks will occur as part of the proposed project’s implementation. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
F. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource, site, or unique geologic feature? ● No New Impact.
According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, a Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment of the project site was conducted by Envicom Corporation on June 22, 2022. Based on this assessment, there is a low likelihood any paleontological resources or unique geologic features would be encountered since excavation is unlikely to be deeper than 10-feet in depth. However, previously unidentified paleontological resources can be found during ground-breaking activities, therefore the following mitigation measure would be required.
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: If any paleontological materials are encountered during the course of project development, all further development activities within 30-feet of the discovery shall halt until a qualified senior paleontologist can evaluate the nature and/or significance of the find(s). If the senior paleontologist determines that the discovery is potentially significant, then the Lead Agency will be contacted and informed of the discovery. Construction will not resume in the locality of the discovery until consultation between the senior paleontologist, the owner’s project manager, or the Lead Agency takes place and reaches a conclusion approved by the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency may also require the site to be monitored during the rest of the project excavation.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
The environmental analysis determined that there may be a potential for paleontological resources to be uncovered during the ground-disturbing phases of development. As a result, the following mitigation measure is required:
Mitigation Measure GEO-1: If any paleontological materials are encountered during the course of project development, all further development activities within 30-feet of the discovery shall halt until a qualified senior paleontologist can evaluate the nature and/or significance of the find(s). If the senior paleontologist determines that the discovery is potentially significant, then the Lead Agency will be contacted and informed of the discovery. Construction will not resume in the locality of the discovery until consultation between the senior paleontologist, the owner’s project manager, or the Lead Agency takes place and reaches a conclusion approved by the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency may also require the site to be monitored during the rest of the project excavation.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 35
5.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? ● No New Impact.
According to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the senior living project by Envicom Corporation, the approved facility would not exceed any SCAQMD suggested screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E for residential land uses. As previously mentioned, both projects are residential land uses and are similar in nature however, the intensity and density of the proposed 17 single-family units would be less than the approved 60-unit living facility. The proposed single-family units have a total building square footage of 29,739 square feet compared to the senior-living facility which was designed to have a total building square footage of 100,000 square feet. The scale and mass of the proposed singlefamily units project would be smaller than the approved senior living facility. Therefore, both construction and operational emissions would be lower than the senior living facility and the proposed project would not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2E threshold. The construction and operational emissions are shown below in Table
5. TABLE 5 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Source
GHG Emissions (metric tons/year)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2E
Long-Term - Total Operational Emissions 237 0.15 0.01 243 Total Construction Emissions 75.0 -- -- 73.1
Significance Threshold 3,000
Source: CalEEMod V.2022.1.1.29
As a result, the impacts will be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 36
B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases? ● No New Impact.
The proposed project will not be in conflict with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate The Paramount General Plan Change includes Goals, Policies and Programs with a preamble identifying the City’s efforts to coordinate with state, regional, and County agencies to establish and maintain an up to date database on climate change conditions in the region, legislation affecting the City’s regulatory responsibilities, and changing technical assessments that refine or re-characterize the climate change impacts affecting the region. The City would also monitor the effectiveness of its adaptation strategies. The City’s development review process is designed to assure that development proposals are thoroughly evaluated regarding climate change and that comprehensive mitigation measures are developed and implemented. The City is also taking a proactive role to assure the public is safe by informing them about severity of climate change impacts and what resources are available to them to mitigate these impacts.
Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. The project would also comply with applicable Green Building Standards and City of Paramount’s policies regarding sustainability as dictated by the Paramount Climate Action Plan (PCAP) that was adopted in 2021. The PCAP provided an evaluation of Paramount’s current GHG emissions and established GHG target and reduction goals. Finally, the PCAP included the Plan’s implementation and monitoring.
The previous section evaluated the proposed project’s GHG emissions. The analysis determined that the GHG emissions would be below the regionally accepted thresholds. The calculated emissions would not exceed the GHG and criteria air pollutant thresholds and therefore would not interfere with the City’s efforts to monitor and do its part to address climate change. The proposed project would not involve or require any variance from an adopted plan, policy, or regulation governing GHG emissions. As a result, the potential impacts are less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
As indicated previously, the proposed project will not result in any significant adverse GHG emissions impacts. As a result, no mitigation is required.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 37
5.9 HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
D. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
E. Would the project for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
F. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
G. Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ● No New Impact.
The project’s construction would require the use of diesel fuel to power the construction equipment. The diesel fuel would be properly sealed in tanks and would be transported to the site by truck. Other hazardous materials that would be used on-site during the project’s construction phases include, but are not limited to, gasoline, solvents, architectural coatings, and equipment lubricants. These products are strictly controlled and regulated and in the event of any spill, cleanup activities would be required to adhere to all pertinent protocols. Once operational, the use of any hazardous materials would be limited to those that are commercially available and typically used for household maintenance. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 38
B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment, or result in reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ● No New Impact.
The original Initial Study cited the Phase 1 Environmental Site conducted by Citadel EHS dated February 11, 2022. The assessment recommended the church building to be tested for any polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The Initial Study included a mitigation measure for PCB testing and safe disposal, however this was to take place prior to demolition. As the project site has already undergone demolition of any existing structures and is now vacant, the mitigation measure would no longer be required and there would be no impacts. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ● No New Impact.
McKinley Elementary School (Long Beach) is the only school located within one-quarter of a mile from the project site. The project’s construction would require the use of diesel fuel to power the construction equipment. The diesel fuel would be properly sealed in tanks and would be transported to the site by truck.
Other hazardous materials that would be used on-site during the project’s construction phases include, but are not limited to, gasoline, solvents, architectural coatings, and equipment lubricants. These products are strictly controlled and regulated and in the event of any spill, cleanup activities would be required to adhere to all pertinent protocols. Once operational, the use of any hazardous materials would be limited to those that are commercially available and typically used for household maintenance. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
D. Would the project be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ● No New Impact.
A search was conducted through the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Envirostor website to determine whether the project site is not listed in the database as a Cortese site. The project site is not identified on the list. Since the proposed project will not be located on a site included on the list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, no impacts will occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
E. Would the project be located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ● No New Impact.
The nearest public airports are the Long Beach Airport, located approximately 3.77 miles south of the project site and the Compton-Woodley Airport, located approximately 4.43 miles northwest of the project site. The GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 39
project site is not located within two miles of a private airstrip. As a result, the proposed project will not present a safety hazard related to aircraft and/or airport operations at a private use airstrip and no impacts will occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
F. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ● No New Impact.
At no time will Paramount Boulevard be completely closed to traffic during the construction phase. The project contractors will be required to submit a construction and staging plan to the City for approval. No staging areas or construction equipment parking on Paramount Boulevard will be permitted. Thus, no impacts on emergency response or evacuation plans will result from the project’s construction. As a result, no impacts would occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
G. Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wild lands fire, including where wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands? ● No New Impact.
The project site and surrounding properties are urbanized and the majority of the parcels are developed.
There are no areas of native vegetation found within the project site or in the surrounding properties that could provide a fuel source for a wildfire. As a result, there are no impacts associated with potential wildfires from off-site locations. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
PREVIOUS MITIGATION MEASURES FOR DRA NO. 22:001, GPA 22-1, AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 239
As indicated previously, the proposed project will not result in any significant adverse GHG emissions impacts. As a result, no mitigation is required.
GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 40
5.10 HYDROLOGY & WATER QUALITY
Environmental Issue Areas Examined
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No New
Impact
A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?
B. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i). Would the project result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site; ii). Would the project result substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding on- or off-site.
iii). Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
iv). Would the project impede or redirect flood flows? D. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? ● No New Impact.
The project site is currently vacant and covered over in impervious surfaces. The new impervious surfaces (internal driveways, parking areas, buildings, etc.) that will be constructed as part of the site’s development could lead to the presence of debris, leaves, soils, oil/grease, and other pollutants within the parking areas.
These pollutants may enter the storm drain system during periods of rainfall in the absence of any required mitigation. The proposed project will be required to implement storm water pollution control measures pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements and Chapter
8.20.210 of the City’s Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of any construction permit for the project that would result in soil disturbance of one or more acres of land. The building contractors shall demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under California's General Permit for Storm water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 41
Resources Control Board, and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) Number or other proof of filing shall be provided to the Chief Building Official and the City Engineer. The building contractors shall prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be submitted to the Chief Building Official and City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The building contractors shall register their SWPPP with the State of California. A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review on request. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
B. Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge in such a way that would cause a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of a pre-existing nearby well would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? ● No New Impact.
Construction-related activities are not anticipated to encounter and deplete groundwater supplies from any underlying aquifer. Other than the footings and supports for the new building, grading activities will not extend into the native soils located on-site. In addition, the proposed project will be connected to the City’s utility lines and is not anticipated to deplete groundwater supplies through the consumption of the water (water consumption impacts are analyzed in subsection D). A search was conducted through the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s on-line database Geotracker to identify the presence of any water wells.
According to the Geotracker, no wells are located within the project site. As a result, no impacts would occur.
The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion? ● No New Impact.
As mentioned in subsection B, the proposed project’s location would be restricted to the proposed project site and will not alter the course of any stream or river that would lead to on- or off-site siltation or erosion.
Following the construction of the 17 single-family units, stormwater runoff would mainly percolate into the landscaped areas. Excess runoff would drain into catch basins onsite. The proposed project will not alter or otherwise affect the course of major drainage systems in the area (the Los Angeles River). As a result, no impacts would occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239. i). Would the project result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ● No New Impact.
The proposed project's location would be restricted to the proposed project site and would not lead to a substantial on- or off-site siltation or erosion. The project has been previously developed and has been demolished to accommodate the proposed development. As a result, less than significant impacts would GPA 25-2, ZC NO. 252, TTM NO. 084854, & DRA NO. 25:004
GOLD KEY DEVELOPMENT
16635, 16675, & 16683 PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD, PARAMOUNT, CA 90723 PAGE 42
occur. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239. ii). Would the project result substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding on- or off-site. ● No New Impact.
As mentioned in subsection B, the proposed project’s location would be restricted to the proposed project site and would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Following the construction of the 17 single-family units, stormwater runoff would mainly percolate into the landscaped areas. Excess runoff would drain into catch basins onsite. The proposed project will not alter or otherwise affect the course of major drainage systems in the area (the Los Angeles River). As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.
iii). Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or ● No New Impact.
Following the construction of the 17 single-family units, stormwater runoff would mainly percolate into the landscaped areas. Excess runoff would drain into catch basins onsite. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239. iv). Would the project impede or redirect flood flows? ● No New Impact.
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance map obtained from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, the proposed project site is located in Zone X, Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. This flood zone has an annual probability of flooding of less than 0.2 percent and represents areas outside the 500-year flood plain. Thus, properties located in Zone X are not located within a 100-year flood plain. In case of floods, the project site would not impede any flows.
Stormwater would be conveyed through the existing drainage facilities along Paramount Boulevard. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. The proposed development contemplated as part of the proposed Addendum would not introduce any new impacts not already contemplated or identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the original DRA No. 22:001, GPA 22-1, and Zone Change No. 239.