Agenda, regular meeting — Parlier City Council, August 18, 2022

PARLIER CITY COUNCIL OF PARLIER

REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
This meeting of the City of Parlier City Council is live streamed and may be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJs3y/cM9NWQGLdwpBCmoAQ DATE: THURSDAY, AUGUST 18, 2022
TIME: 6:30 PM
PLACE: Parlier City Hall
1100 E. Parlier Avenue
Parlier, CA 93648
CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME:

Roll Call: Mayor Alma M. Beltran, Mayor Pro-Temp Trinidad Pimentel, Councilwoman Diane Maldonado, Council woman Sabrina Rodriguez, Council woman Cathryn "Kathy" Solorio, City Clerk Dorothy Garza and Treasurer Michelle Lopez.

FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Alma M. Beltran
INVOCATION:

ADDITIONS/DELETIONS:

PRESENTATIONS/ INFORMATIONAL:

Steve Samuelian - California Consulting
Susan Bechara - Comprehensive Behavioral Services
PUBLIC COMMENT:

At this time any citizen may address the City Council on matters not appearing on the agenda that are within the jurisdiction of the City of Parlier. Speakers shall limit their comments to three (3) minutes unless extended by the Mayor. Please begin your comments by stating your name and City of residence.

The City Council is prohibited by law from taking collective formal action on matters raised during public that are not on the agenda, but individual council members may respond to anyone providing any public comment. No adverse conclusion should be drawn if the City Council does not respond to any public comment. Responses to public comment by individual city council members may or may not reflect the views of any other, or of a majority of council members.

The Council may refer the matter to the City Manager or staff or request that it be placed on a CONSENT CALENDAR:

All Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted in one motion. There will be no separate discussion of items appearing on the Consent Calendar unless requested to be removed for separate discussion and acted on by separate vote.

1. Approve the Check Reports dated August 2, 2022 to August 15, 2022.

2. Approve the Minutes dated Regular Meeting July 12, 2022 and August 4, 2022 REGULAR BUSINESS:

3. SUBJECT: Consideration and Necessary Action on Resolution 2022-45 authorizing the contract award of the Parlier 2022 Road Rehab Project to Pavement Coatings Co.

RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2022-45, designating and authorizing the City Manager to award construction contracts for the applying fiberized black rock micro-surfacing, asphalt micro grinding, striping signage in various local streets, in the amount of $577,839.90

4. SUBJECT: Consider adoption of a mitigated negative declaration for and approval of the Fig Tree Park Project.

PUBLIC HEARING: a. Mayor Beltran to open Public Hearing b. Public input/testimony for or against.
c. Mayor Beltran to close Public Hearing
RECOMMENDATION: City Council to consider Resolution No. 2022-46, adopting the mitigated negative declaration, Resolution No. 2022-47, amending the land use designation of the site, and introduction and waiver of the first reading of Ordinance No. 2022-04, changing the zoning of the site.

5. SUBJECT: Consider amendments to the Cannabis Control Ordinance regarding the number of permissible dispensaries in the city.

PUBLIC HEARING: a. Mayor Beltran to open Public Hearing b. Public input/testimony for or against.

C. Mayor Beltran to close Public Hearing
RECOMMENDATION: City Council to consider introduction and waiver of first reading of Ordinance No. 2202-05, increasing the permissible number of dispensaries in the city from one to two.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION

THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS RESERVED FOR PERSONS DESIRING TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL ON AN ITEM WHICH IS TO BE CONSIDERED DURING CLOSED SESSION. SPEAKERS SHALL LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS TO THREE (3) MINUTES.

CLOSED SESSION:

6. Public Employment Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 All Positions.

BRIEF COMMENTS: COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/COMMENTS:

CITY MANAGER:

CITY ATTORNEY:

CITY COUNCIL:

ADJOURNMENT

ADA NOTICE
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (559) 646-3545 ext. 227. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the city to make arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

DOCUMENTS
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the front counter at City Hall located at 1100 East Parlier Avenue, Parlier, CA during normal business hours. In addition, most documents are posted on the City's website at www.parlier.ca.us Proposed event for Parlier by CBS August - December 2022 September 17th Saturday 9-12pm
Veteran's Park (need approval from City Council)
Mush Ball tournament :

Police Dept competes with the Community and Youth
Need : Raffles, gifts, hot dogs refreshment and vendors.

Empire and equipment will be provided by PD
October 9th Sunday 7.30 - 6.00 pm
Earl Ruth Park (need approval form City Council)
Car registration starts at 7.30am ( pay to get in)
Judges by category 12.00 pm
Raffles needed, trophies, DJ/Music, vendors ( pay entrance Fee $25.00) MC? Special guest and speakers, Mayor, Chief and representative form the School district
December 10th Saturday 5-9pm
"Parlier Got Talent " Location: School Auditorium Pay to participate Need Judges, trophies, snacks and refreshment s.

TOES
Comprehensive Behavioral Services
A comprehensive Educational Approach for today's youth, parents and adults

EVENT PROPOSAL
EVENT TITLE : MUSH BALL TOURNAMENT FOR PEACE
DATE: SEPTEMBER 17 2022
LOCATION: VETERAN'S PARK
TIME: 8.30 - 12.30 PM
PURPOSE:

TO CREATE A FRIENDLY, FUN AND POSITIVE EVENT TO BRING THE

COMMUNITY AND THE YOUTH TOGETHER WITH THE PARLIER POLICE DEPARTMENT.

SPONSORSHIP:

PARLIER POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAY'S LEMONADE, CITY OF PARLIER, PARLIER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, PIZZA PIRATES, Vendors 4 U& more.

Police will provide Empire, and equipment
CBS will provide raffle and gift card music.

ENTRY FEE FOR AUDIENCE: MINIMUM $2.00 DONATION.

Address: 2830 N. Blackstone Ave Fresno Ca 93703 Tel: (559) 243-9731 Fax: (559) 221584 Emall: [email protected] Comprehensive Behavioral Services
A comprehensive Educational Approach for today's youth, parents and adults Address: 2830 N. Blackstone Ave Frersio Ca 93703 Tel: (559) 243-9731 Fax: (559) 221584 Emall: [email protected] OBS
Comprehensive Behavioral Services
A comprehensive Educational Approach for today's youth, parents and adults

EVENT PROPOSAL
DATE: OCTOBER 9TH 2022
EVENT TITLE : PARLIER FALL CAR SHOW FESTIVAL
LOCATION: EARL RUTH PARK /FLORES FIELD
TIME: 7.30 AM - 6.30 PM
PURPOSE:

To Benefit the Parlier Youth Intervention Center at 745 Tulare Street SPONSORSHIP:

Family Classic Car Clubs, Lyons Club, Police Department, The City of Parlier, The Parlier School District, The Parlier Businesses, and Vendors 4 U & More .

Traffic : Police Department
Security: Police Department and CBS and the Car Club
CBS will provide Trophies, and the Kiddie Corners and the Vendors ENTRY FEE PER CAR: $30.00
WALK-INS AND AUDIENCE : $5.00 PER ADULT PERSON.

Children under age 12: FREE
Youth 13-18 will pay $2.00
Address: 2830 N. Blackstone Ave Fresno Ca 93703 Tel: (559) 243-9731 Fax: (559) 221584 Emall: [email protected] DESX
Comprehensive Behavioral Services
A comprehensive Educational Approach for today's youth, parents and adults

DRUG FREE EVENT
Address: 2830 N. Blackstone Ave Fresno Ca 93703 Tel: (559) 243-9731 Fax: (559) 221584 Emall: [email protected] #/
Check Report
CITY OF PARLIER By Check Number
Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Bank Code: APBNK-APBNK
WRT01 LOPREST DIVISION OF WRT 08/04/2022 Regular 0.00 466,950.30 59077 GAL09 VIRGINIA GALAVIZ 08/04/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59078 ADT01 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 2,649.10 59079 **Void** 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 0.00 | 59080
BCT01 BCT CONSULTING, INC. 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 1,210.00 59081 CAN05 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 150.46 59082 CIN01 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 375.43 59083 COM05 COMCAST 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 4,079.42 59084
**Void** 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 0.00 59085
DELOO DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 5,946.39 59086 DIA11 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 270.00 59087 HER25 JUANITA HERRERA 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59088 P.G01 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 4,297.64 59089 SOCOO SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 4,575.00 59090 SPA00 SPARKLETTS 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 309.30 | 59091 TCM01 TCM INVESTMENTS LP 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 615.52 59092 AT&09 AT&T 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 165.62 59093
CINO1 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 181.23 59094 GO002 GOODSUITE 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 1,302.28 59095
P.G01 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 9,599.60 59096 SPA00 SPARKLETTS 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 312.79 59097
BEL03 ALMA M. BELTRAN 08/11/2022 Regular 0.00 1,085.70 59098 CEN13 CENTRAL VALLEY SWEEPING 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 7,550.00 59099 CYN01 CYNTHIA SANDOVAL 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59100 DELOO DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 319.25 59101 PAS01 DELMY PASCACIO 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -3,000.00 59102 PAS01 DELMY PASCACIO 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59102 GO002 GOODSUITE 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 1,890.00 59103
LUN04 LUNA, ADRIANA 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59104 ESCO5 OLGA ESCOBAR 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -4,000.00 59105 ESCO5 OLGA ESCOBAR 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 59105 PARO8 PARLIER VIDEO 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 59106 PIT04 PURCHASE POWER 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 59107 SAN18 Soledad Sandoval 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59108 SAN18 Soledad Sandoval 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -3,000.00 59108 UN 01 unWIRED BROADBAND, INC. 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 74.99 59109 COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59110 COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -3,000.00 59110 GOM09 YOLANDA GOMEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59111 PADO7 YOLANDA PADILLA 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 59112 BOT02 BOTANICA SAN LAZARITO 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 59117 DEL01 DELMA GIFT SHOP & FRESH FLOWER 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59118 SOL06 SOL BEAUTY SALON 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59119 BOM01 THE BOMB SHELL 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59120 COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59121 COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -3,000.00 59121 ALE04 BETHAUN ENTERPRISES INC. 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 10,000.00 59122 BERO3 Alvina Talavera Bernabe 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 59123 A&MOO A&M CONSULTING ENGINEERS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 321,290.00 59124 **Void** 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 0.00 59125
ADCO1 ADCOMP SYSTEMS, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 5,815.60 59126 ALBO2 ALBERT L. MENDEZ AIR CONDITIONING & HEAT 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 493.75 59127 ALE01 ALERT-O-LITE, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 4,658.23 59128 AME04 AMERICAN PAVING COMPANY 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 255,035.41 59129 8/15/2022 1:52:39 PM Page 1 of 4
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Amount Number MEJO1 ANGELA MEJIA 08/15/2022 175.00 59130
GAR28 ANGELICA GARZA 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59131
AUGO1 AUGUSTINE, BERTHA E. 08/15/2022 0.00 115.83 59132 AUTO1 AUTO ZONE 08/15/2022 0.00 41.06 59133
BADO1 BADGER METER INC. 08/15/2022 0.00 141.90 59134
BPSO1 BPS TACTICAL, INC 08/15/2022 0.00 589.57 59135
BRE14 BRENNTAG PACIFIC, INC. 08/15/2022 0.00 1,363.80 59136 CAM06 CAM ELECTRIC INC 08/15/2022 0.00 5,049.00 59137
PLAOS CLAUDIA PLANTILLAS 08/15/2022 0.00 51.75 59138
CALZ1 CPOA 08/15/2022 0.00 500.00 59139
KNO01 DAVE KNOLL PLUMBING 08/15/2022 0.00 120.00 59140
REE01 EDDIE C. REED 08/15/2022 0.00 950.00 59141
JIMOZ ESTHER DAISY JIMENEZ 08/15/2022 0.00 51.75 59142
FASOO FASTENAL COMPANY 08/15/2022 0.00 584.61 59143
FIVOZ FIVE CITIES EDA 08/15/2022 0.00 1,085.56 59144
CANO7 HERIBERTO CANO 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59145
HER27 HERNANDEZ, MARIA 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59146
JOHOZ JOHNSTON, CRYSTAL 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59147
T&J01 JOSE M SILVA 08/15/2022 0.00 5,621.12 59148
ACEOO JUNE ACEVES 08/15/2022 0.00 100.00 59149
KOE01 KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES, INC. 08/15/2022 0.00 195.00 59150 MATO9 MARTHA MATA 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59151
PAPO1 MARY JANE PAPADOPOULOS 08/15/2022 0.00 1,816.75 59152 FREO7 McCLATCHY 08/15/2022 0.00 431.40 59153
J0H01 MELANIE JOHNSON 08/15/2022 0.00 45.00 59154
MEN18 MENDOCINO AUTO SALES & RE 08/15/2022 0.00 752.87 59155 MUNO1 MUNI METRIX SYSTEMS CORP. 08/15/2022 0.00 407.89 59156 NAVO2 NAVARRO'S AUTO REPAIRS 08/15/2022 0.00 2,235.40 59157 0'B01 NEIL O'BRIEN 08/15/2022 0.00 36.11 59158
HER26 OLGA HERRERA HERNANDEZ 08/15/2022 0.00 35.00 59159 PRE04 PRECIADO, DAISY 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59160
RAVO4 RAYMUNDO LOPEZ GUTIERREZ 08/15/2022 0.00 77.68 59161 RIPO1 REEDLEY IRRIGATION & SUPP 08/15/2022 0.00 59.69 59162 RENO2 RENT A TOILET 08/15/2022 0.00 165.00 59163
RH001 RHODES INC. 08/15/2022 0.00 445.23 59164
CAMO7 Robbie Campbell 08/15/2022 0.00 45.00 59165
вовоЗ ROBERT SAENZ 08/15/2022 0.00 19,500.00 59166
SAN1R SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR 08/15/2022 0.00 290.00 59167 STA1U STAR 1 MINI MART 08/15/2022 0.00 543.89 ) 59168
STA04 STATE FOODS SUPERMARKET 08/15/2022 0.00 1,268.22. 59169 SYSOO SYSCO OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 08/15/2022 0.00 1,222.27 59170 TEMUJIN JAMES BUSTOS 08/15/2022 0.00 324.05 59171
MCCO2 TERRY MCCOY 08/15/2022 0.00 335.00 59172
THEOS THE OFFICE CITY 08/15/2022 0.00 92.32 59173
TOW02 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC. 08/15/2022. 0.00 2,000.00 59174 TYLOO TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 08/15/2022 0.00 2,115.10 59175 CISOO ZULEMA CISNEROS 08/15/2022 0.00 200.00 59176
BADO1 BADGER METER INC. 08/15/2022 0.00 861.90 59177
CEN19 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 08/15/2022 0.00 385.40 59178 NAVO2 NAVARRO'S AUTO REPAIRS 08/15/2022 0.00 4,715.33 59179 PRO01 PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP 08/15/2022 0.00 3,432.30 59180 1000 VANESSA A. EINERSON 08/15/2022 0.00 1,626.21 59181 WIL06 WILLDAN ENGINEERING 08/15/2022 0.00 220.00 59182
8/15/2022 1:52:39 PM Page 2 of 4
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number PER01 CALPERS 08/11/2022 Bank Draft 20,640.12 DFT0000553 Bank Code APBNK Summary
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 196 99 0.00 1,229,423.97
Manual Checks 0 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 8 0.00 -16,000.00
Bank Drafts 1 1 0.00 20,640.12
EFT's 0 0.00 0.00
197 108 0.00 1,234,064.09
8/15/2022 1:52:39 PM Page 3 of 4
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 196 99 0.00 1,229,423.97
Manual Checks 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 8 0.00 -16,000.00
Bank Drafts 1 1 0.00 20,640.12
EFT's 0.00 0.00
197 108 0.00 1,234,064.09
Fund Summary
Fund Name Period Amount
999 POOL FUND 8/2022 1,234,064.09
1,234,064.09
8/15/2022 1:52:39 PM Page 4 of 4
PA Check Report
CITY OF PARLIER By Check Number
Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Bank Code: APBNK-APBNK
WRT01 LOPREST DIVISION OF WRT 08/04/2022 Regular 0.00 466,950.30 59077 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 0822-03 Invoice 08/04/2022 GAC ADSORPTION SYSTEM 0.00 130,241.18 403-5600-7006 TCP CAPITAL PROJECT GAC ADSORPTION SYSTEM 130,241.18 0822-04 Invoice 08/04/2022 GAC ADSORPTION SYSTEM 0.00 336,709.12 403-5600-7006 TCP CAPITAL PROJECT GAC ADSORPTION SYSTEM 336,709.12 GAL09 VIRGINIA GALAVIZ 08/04/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59078 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07/29/22 Invoice 08/04/2022 SC DEP - V.G. FUN 7/29/22 0.00 200.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP - V.G. FUN 7/29/22 200.00 ADT01 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 2,649.10 59079 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 401559711-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PW SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 454.39 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW SECURITY SVCS 7/22 454.39 401559711-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PW SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 459.08 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW SECURITY SVCS 8/22 459.08 401966975-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 WWTP SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 216.71 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WWP SECURITY SVCS 7/22 216.71 401966975-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 WWTP SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 216.71 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WWTP SECURITY SVCS 8/22 216.71 402675472-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 CH SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 55.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CH SECURITY SVCS 7/22 55.93 402675472-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CH SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 55.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CH SECURITY SVCS 8/22 55.93 402676105-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 GD SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 54.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ GD SECURITY SVCS 7/22 54.93 402676105-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 GD SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 54.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ GD SECURITY SVCS 8/22 54.93 402676106-7-2 1005620-6520 08/10/2022 TC SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 49.66 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ TC SECURITY SVCS 7/22 49.66
402676106-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 TC SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 49.66 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ TC SECURITY SVCS 8/22 49.66 402676109-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC2 SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 55.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CC2 SECURITY SVCS 8/22 55.93 402676110-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 122.18 100-5615-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ SC SECURITY SVCS 7/22 122.18 402676110-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 122.18 100-5615-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ SC SECURITY SVCS 8/22 122.18 402676111-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CCA SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 54.93 100-5618-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CCA SECURITY SVCS 7/22 54.93 402676111-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CCA SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 54.93 100-5618-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CCA SECURITY SVCS 8/22 54.93 402676112-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PA SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 55.93 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 1 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PA SECURITY SVCS 8/22 55.93 402676113-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC1 SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 54.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CC1 SECURITY SVCS 7/22 54.93 402676113-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC1 SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 54.93 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CC1 SECURITY SVCS 8/22 54.93 402676456-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PPR SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 49.66 100-5616-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PPR SECURITY SVCS 7/22 49.66 402676456-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PPR SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 49.66 100-5616-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PPR SECURITY SVCS 8/22 49.66 402676458-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PSR SECURITY SCS 7/22 0.00 49.66 100-5616-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSR SECURITY SVCS 7/22 49.66 402676458-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PSR SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 49.66 100-5616-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSR SECURITY SVCS 8/22 49.66 402676461-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 CC SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 54.93 100-5617-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CC SECURITY SVCS 7/22 54.93 402676461-8-22 • Invoice 08/10/2022 CC SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 54.93 100-5617-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CC SECURITY SVCS 8/22 54.93 402829128-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CCB SECURITY SVCS 7/22 0.00 47.07 100-5618-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CB SECURITY SVCS 7/22 47.07 402829128-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CCB SECURITY SVCS 8/22 0.00 49.66 100-5618-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CB SECURITY SVCS 8/22 49.66 **Void** 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 0.00 59080
BCT01 BCT CONSULTING, INC. 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 1,210.00 59081 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 230-08012022-36 Invoice 08/09/2022 ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 0.00 1,210.00 100-5200-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 101.25 100-5400-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 576.25 100-5615-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 26.25 100-5700-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 51.25 100-5700-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 76.25 269-6303-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 151.25 400-5300-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA & PAG ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 88.13 400-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 25.63 401-5300-6510 TELEPHONE/ DATA/PAGE ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 88.12 401-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER ALL FAC PHONE SVCS 8/22 25.62 CANO5 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 150.46 59082 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 28845745 Invoice 08/09/2022 CD PRINTER SVCS 8/22 0.00 150.46 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CD PRINTER SVCS 8/22 150.46 CINO1 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 375.43 59083 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 4124481570 Invoice 08/10/2022 WK SVCS 7/6/22 0.00 194.20 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 7/6/22 23.12 100-5617-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 7/6/22 36.92 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 7/6/22 67.08 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WK SVCS 7/6/22 67.08 4125262308 Invoice 08/10/2022 WK SVCS 7/13/22 0.00 181.23 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 7/13/22 22.88 100-5617-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 7/13/22 36.68 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 7/13/22 60.84 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 2 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WK SVCS 7/13/22 60.83 COMOS COMCAST 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 4,079.42 59084
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 0230-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC2 DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 103.69 100-5620-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER CC2 DATA SVCS 7/22 103.69 0230-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC2 DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 103.69 100-5620-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER CC2 DATA SVCS 8/22 103.69 0248-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC DATA SCS 7/22 0.00 103.69 100-5618-6510 TELEPHONE/ DATA CC DATA SVCS 7/22 103.69
0248-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 103.69 100-5618-6510 TELEPHONE/ DATA CC DATA SVCS 8/22 103.69
0255-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC1 DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 103.69 100-5620-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER CC1 DATA SVCS 7/22 103.69 0255-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CC1 DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 103.69 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CC1 DATA SVCS 8/22 103.69 0263-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 TC DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 170.77 279-5700-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER TC DATA SVCS 7/22 170.77 0263-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 TC DATA SCS 8/22 0.00 170.79 279-5700-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER TC DATA SVCS 8/22 170.79 1293-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PA DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 312.62 269-6303-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER PA DATA SVCS 7/22 312.62 1293-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PA DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 312.66 269-6303-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER PA DATA SVCS 8/22 312.66 1665-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PD DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 274.19 100-5400-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER PD DATA SVCS 7/22 274.19 1665-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PD DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 274.16 100-5400-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER PD DATA SVCS 8/22 274.16 1792-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CH DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 631.55 100-5620-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER CH DATA SVCS 7/22 631.55 1792-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CH DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 632.64 100-5620-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER CH DATA SVCS 8/22 632.64 1851-8-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 PW DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 231.26 400-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER PW DATA SVCS 8/22 231.26 9752-7-22 Invoice 08/10/2022 CH PD DATA SVCS 7/22 0.00 446.64 100-5400-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER CH PD DATA SVCS 7/22 446.64 **Void** 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 0.00 59085
DELOO DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 5,946.39 59086 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 76953705 Invoice 08/09/2022 COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 0.00 304.05 100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 304.05 76992978 Invoice 08/09/2022 COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 0.00 5,642.34 100-5100-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 244.35 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 461.60 100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 1,136.00 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 244.35 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 244.35 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 1,086.10 400-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 676.61 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 436.19 401-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 676.60 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 3 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 436.19 DIA11 DIAMOND COMMUNICATIONS 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 270.00 59087 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 243520 Invoice 08/09/2022 PA FIRE ALARM SVCS 9/22 0.00 90.00 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PA FIRE ALARM SVCS 9/22 90.00 243521 Invoice 08/09/2022 CC FIRE ALARM SVCS 9/22 0.00 90.00 100-5618-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CC FIRE ALARM SVCS 9/22 90.00 243522 Invoice 08/09/2022 SC FIRE ALARM SCS 9/22 0.00 90.00 100-5615-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ SC FIRE ALARM SVCS 9/22 90.00 HER25 JUANITA HERRERA 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59088 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08/05/22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC DEP - J.H. 08/05/22 0.00 200.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP - J.H. 08/05/22 200.00 P.G01 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 4,297.64 59089 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount K Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08083-7-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 MILTON ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 26.12 200-5600-6512 ELECTRICITY MILTON ELEC SVCS 7/22 26.12
16206-5-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 CC2 ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 1,118.57 100-5620-6512 ELECTRICITY CC2 ELEC SVCS 7/22 1,118.57
19391-1-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 HP ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 1,737.31 100-5610-6512 ELECTRICITY HP ELEC SVCS 7/22 1,737.31
31793-3-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 B VISTA ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 10.06 200-5600-6512 ELECTRICITY B VISTA ELEC SVCS 7/22 10.06
51134-5-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 MADSEN ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 58.99 200-5600-6512 ELECTRICITY MADSEN ELEC SVCS 7/22 58.99
65206-7-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 CC1 ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 1,242.68 100-5620-6512 ELECTRICITY CC1 ELEC SVCS 7/22 1,242.68
80272-9-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 CC ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 34.64 100-5618-6512 ELECTRICITY CC ELEC SVCS 7/22 34.64
96580-5-7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 J ST ELEC SVCS 7/22 0.00 69.27 200-5600-6512 ELECTRICITY J ST ELEC SVCS 7/22 69.27
SOCOO SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 4,575.00 59090 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 36G2213-IN Invoice 08/10/2022 LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 0.00 4,575.00 100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 100-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 100-5610-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 100-5615-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 203-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 204-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 213-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 915.00 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ LANDSCAPE SVCS 7/22 457.50 SPAOO SPARKLETTS 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 309.30 59091
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 1530672608042 Invoice 08/10/2022 PD WATER SVCS 7/22 0.00 63.84 100-5400-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES PD WATER SVCS 7/22 63.84 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 4 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number 22121535 07292 Invoice 08/10/2022 CH WATER SVCS 7/22 0.00 64.35 100-5200-6001 GH EXPENSES CH WATER SVCS 7/22 21.45
100-5300-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES CH WATER SVCS 7/22 21.45 100-5700-6001 Operational Supplies CH WATER SVCS 7/22 21.45 2212156507292 Invoice 08/10/2022 PW WATER SVCS 7/22 0.00 64.35 100-5600-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES PW WATER SVCS 7/22 64.35 22121622 07292 Invoice 08/10/2022 PA WATER SVCS 7/22 0.00 116.76 269-6303-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES PA WATER SVCS 7/22 116.76 TCM01 TCM INVESTMENTS LP 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 615.52 59092 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 162799 Invoice 08/09/2022 FLDNG MCHN LEASE 8/22 0.00 615.52 400-5300-6541 LEASE CONTRACTS FLDNG MCHN LEASE 8/22 246.20 401-5300-6541 LEASE CONTRACTORS FLDNG MCHN LEASE 8/22 246.20 402-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES FLDNG MCHN LEASE 8/22 123.12 AT&09 AT&T 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 165.62 59093
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 000018486965 Invoice 06/30/2022 VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BANG7 0.00 142.92 400-5300-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA & PAG VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BAN67 23.82 400-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BAN67 23.82 401-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BAN67 23.82 401-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BAN67 23.82 401-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BAN67 23.82 401-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER VARIOUS SVCS 6/22 BAN67 23.82 000018487311 Invoice 06/30/2022 WELL 2A SVCS 6/22 BAN64 0.00 22.70 400-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER WELL 2A SVCS 6/22 BAN64 22.70 CINO1 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 181.23 59094 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 4123878818 Invoice 06/30/2022 WK SVCS 6/29/22 0.00 181.23 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 6/29/22 22.88 100-5617-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 6/29/22 36.68 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ WK SVCS 6/29/22 60.84 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WK SVCS 6/29/22 60.83 GO002 GOODSUITE 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 1,302.28 59095
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INV156232 Invoice 06/30/2022 COPY MCHN SUPPLIES 0.00 826.85 269-6303-6002 PARTS SUPPLIES COPY MCHN SUPPLIES 826.85
INV157112 Invoice 06/30/2022 COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 0.00 475.43 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 20.00 100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 165.00 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 15.00 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 10.00 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 5.00 400-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 127.72 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 2.50 401-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 127.71 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COPY MCHN SVCS 6/22 2.50 P.G01 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 08/10/2022 Regular 0.00 9,599.60 59096 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 5 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 50754-3-6-22 Invoice 06/30/2022 STREET LIGHT SVCS 6/22
200-5600-6512 STREET LIGHT SVCS 6/22
52769-3-6-22 Invoice 06/30/2022 STREET LIGHT SVCS 6/22 0.00 3,821.83 200-5600-6512 ELECTRICITY STREET LIGHT SVCS 6/22 3,821.83 80980-1-6-22 Invoice 06/30/2022 TRAFFIC LIGHT SVCS 6/22 0.00 123.68 200-5600-6512 ELECTRICITY TRAFFIC LIGHT SVCS 6/22 123.68 SPAOO SPARKLETTS 08/10/2022 Regular 312.79 59097
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 1530672607072 Invoice 06/30/2022 PD WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 100-5400-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES PD WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 56.86 22121535 07012 Invoice 06/30/2022 CH WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 0.00 58.84 100-5200-6001 GBH EXPENSES CH WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 19.62 100-5300-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES CH WATER SVCS 6/22 19.61 100-5700-6001 Operational Supplies CH WATER SVCS 6/22 19.61 22121565 07012 Invoice 06/30/2022 PW WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 0.00 115.78 100-5600-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES PW WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 115.78 2212162207012 Invoice 06/30/2022 PA WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 0.00 81.31 269-6303-6001 OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES PA WATER SVCS 6/22 COR 81.31 BELO3 ALMA M. BELTRAN 08/11/2022 Regular 0.00 1,085.70 59098 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08/10/22 Invoice 08/11/2022 DC TRIP FLIGHT REIM 0.00 645.70 100-5100-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR DC TRIP FLIGHT REIM 645.70 08/13/22 Invoice 08/11/2022 DC TRIP 4 DAYS 0.00 440.00
100-5100-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR DC TRIP 440.00
CEN13 CENTRAL VALLEY SWEEPING 08/12/2022 0.00 7,550.00 59099 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 2022-003531 Invoice 08/11/2022 SWEEPING SVCS 7/22 0.00 7,550.00 200-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ SWEEPING SVCS 7/22 7,550.00 CYNO1 CYNTHIA SANDOVAL 08/12/2022 200.00 59100
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08/10/22 Invoice 08/11/2022 SC DEP - C.S. 08/10/22
100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP - C.S. 08/10/22
DELOO DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL 08/12/202 Regular 319.25 59101 Payable # Payable Type Post Date ayable Descriptio Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 17224699 Invoice 08/11/2022 COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 319.25
100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 8/22 319.25 PASO1 DELMY PASCACIO 08/12/2022 0.00 -3,000.00 59102
PASO1 DELMY PASCACIO 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59102 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-05 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
GOOO2 GOODSUITE 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 1,890.00 59103
8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 6 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INV159792 Invoice 08/11/2022 COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 0.00 1,890.00 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 58.00 100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 313.00 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 55.00 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 21.00 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 46.00 400-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 403.50 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 295.00 401-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 403.50 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COPY MCHN SVCS 7/22 295.00 LUNO4 LUNA, ADRIANA 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59104 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-OZ Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
ESCOS OLGA ESCOBAR 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -4,000.00 59105 ESCOS OLGA ESCOBAR 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 4,000.00 59105 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-09 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 4,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 4,000.00
PAROS PARLIER VIDEO 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 59106 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-03 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 6,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 6,000.00
PITO4 PURCHASE POWER 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 59107 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 7988-8-22 Invoice 08/11/2022 POSTAGE MCHN SUPPLIES 0.00 1,000.00 100-5200-6012 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR POSTAGE MCHN SUPPLIES 200.00 100-5400-6012 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR POSTAGE MCHN SUPPLIES 200.00 100-5700-6012 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR POSTAGE MCHN SUPPLIES 200.00 400-5300-6012 POSTAGE, SHIPPING & FR POSTAGE MCHN SUPPLIES 200.00 401-5300-6512 ELECTRICITY POSTAGE MCHN SUPPLIES 200.00
SAN18 Soledad Sandoval 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59108 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-04 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
SAN18 Soledad Sandoval 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 -3,000.00 59108 UN 01 unWIRED BROADBAND, INC. 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 74.99 59109 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INVO1410489 Invoice 08/11/2022 WWTP DATA SVCS 8/22 0.00 74.99 401-5600-6510 TELEPHONE/DATA/PAGER WWTP DATA SVCS 8/22 74.99 COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59110 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-02 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 7 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular -3,000.00 59110 GOMO9 YOLANDA GOMEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59111 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-08 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
PADO7 YOLANDA PADILLA 08/12/2022 6,000.00 59112
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description iscount Amount Payable Amoun Account Number Account Name Item Description istribution Amoun ARPA-06 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 6,000.00
250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 6,000.00
BOT02 BOTANICA SAN LAZARITO 08/12/2022 Regular 4,000.00 59117 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-09 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 4,000.00
250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 4,000.00
DEL01 DELMA GIFT SHOP & FRESH FLOWER 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59118 Payable# Payable Type Post Date ayable Descriptio Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-05 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
SOL06 SOL BEAUTY SALON 08/12/2022 Regular 3,000.00 59119 Payable Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-04 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
BOM01 THE BOMB SHELL 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59120 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number • Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-02 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 3,000.00 59121 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-02 Invoice 08/12/2022 ARPA BUS. ASST. 0.00 3,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS ARPA BUS. ASST. 3,000.00
COR16 YASSMYN CORTEZ 08/12/2022 -3,000.00 59121
ALE04 BETHAUN ENTERPRISES INC. 08/12/2022 10,000.00 59122 Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 1/27/22 08/12/2022 COMMUNITY CENTER FLOORING
300-5700-8100 CDBG PROGRAM COMMUNITY CENTER FLOORIN
BERO3 Alvina Talavera Bernabe 08/12/2022 Regular 0.00 6,000.00 59123 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount ARPA-01 Invoice 08/12/2022 APRA BUS. ASST. 0.00 6,000.00 250-5700-6535 GRANTS APRA BUS. ASST. 6,000.00
A&MOO A&M CONSULTING ENGINEERS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 321,290.00 59124 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 8 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INV11762021 Invoice 08/11/2022 BIKES & TRAILS PLAN 7/22 0.00 7,884.00 247-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ BIKES & TRAILS PLAN 7/22 7,884.00 INV11772021 Invoice 08/11/2022 FIG TREE PARK 7/22 0.00 16,704.00 243-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIG TREE PARK 7/22 16,704.00 INV11792021 Invoice 08/11/2022 WATER & SEWER PLANS 7/22 0.00 3,720.00 261-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER & SEWER PLANS 7/22 3,720.00 INV11802021 Invoice 08/11/2022 CITY ENGINEER 7/22 0.00 1,320.00 100-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CITY ENGINEER 7/22 1,320.00 INV11812021 Invoice 08/11/2022 DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION 7/22 0.00 13,688.00 250-5700-7006 DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICA DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICATION 13,688.00 INV11842021 Invoice 08/11/2022 ER WATER LINE EXT 7/22 0.00 4,536.00 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ ER WATER LINE EXT 7/22 4,536.00 INV11882021 Invoice 08/11/2022 MANNING AVE REHAB 7/22 0.00 54,804.00 200-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ MANNING AVE REHAB 7/22 54,804.00 INV11892021 Invoice 08/11/2022 UFPG PLANS & SPECS 7/22 0.00 1,440.00 245-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UFPG PLANS & SPECS 7/22 1,440.00 INV11902021 Invoice 08/11/2022 UFPG ENGINEER PLANS & SPECS 7/22 0.00 29,928.00 245-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UFPG ENGINEER PLANS & SPECS 29,928.00 INV11912021 Invoice 08/11/2022 INDEPENDENCIA & PROGRESSO 7/22 0.00 62,376.00 228-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDEPENDENCIA & PROGRESSO 62,376.00 INV11922021 Invoice 08/11/2022 PW DIRECTOR 7/22 0.00 11,040.00 100-5610-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW DIRECTOR 7/22 2,208.00 203-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW DIRECTOR 7/22 2,208.00 206-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW DIRECTOR 7/22 2,208.00 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW DIRECTOR 7/22 2,208.00 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PW DIRECTOR 7/22 2,208.00 INV11952021 Invoice 08/15/2022 WATER & SEWER PLANS 0.00 113,850.00 261-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER & SEWER PLANS 113,850.00 **Void** 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 0.00 59125
ADC01 ADCOMP SYSTEMS, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 5,815.60 59126 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 22038 Invoice 08/10/2022 AN KIOSK SVCS 22/23 0.00 5,815.60 400-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ AN KIOSK SVCS 22/23 1,938.53 401-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ AN KIOSK PYMNT 22/23 1,938.53 402-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AN KIOSK PYMNT 22/23 1,938.54 ALBO2 ALBERT L. MENDEZ AIR CONDITIONING & HEAT 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 493.75 59127 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 4349 Invoice 08/11/2022 TC HVAC SVCS 0.00 493.75
100-5620-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ TCHVAC SVCS 493.75 ALE01 ALERT-O-LITE, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 4,658.23 59128 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 0115715-IN Invoice 08/09/2022 STREET MARKING MATERIAL 0.00 3,442.27 200-5600-6002 PARTS & SUPPLIES STREET MARKING MATERIAL 3,442.27 0115831-IN Invoice 08/11/2022 STREET MARKING MATERIAL 0.00 1,215.96 200-5600-6002 PARTS & SUPPLIES STREET MARKING MATERIAL 1,215.96 AME04 AMERICAN PAVING COMPANY 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 255,035.41 59129 8/15/20221:54:04 PM Page 9 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable# Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 221-0404 Invoice 08/12/2022 DT BEUTIFICATION PRT
250-5700-7006 DOWNTOWN BEAUTIFICA DT BEUTIFICATION PRJT MEJ01 ANGELA MEJIA 08/15/2022 175.00 59130
Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 22-0001306 Invoice 08/12/2022 CHP180 REIM
100-5000-45001 VEHICLE IMPOUND/RELE
GAR28 ANGELICA GARZA 08/15/2022 Regular 200.00 59131
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description iscount Amount Payable Amoun Account Number Account Name Item Description istribution Amoun 07/17/22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC DEP - A.G. 07/17/22 200.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP- A.G. 7/17/22 200.00 AUG01 AUGUSTINE, BERTHA E. 08/15/2022 115.83 59132
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08/12/22 Invoice 08/15/2022 MILEAGE / DONUT REIM 0.00 65.95 100-5200-6011 MILEAGE / DONUT REIM 47.75
100-5200-6540 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENS MILEAGE / DONUT REIM 18.20 8/1/2022 Invoice 08/05/2022 MILEAGE REIMB 0.00 49.88
100-5200-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES MILEAGE REIMB/GST VOTERS 2.50 100-5200-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR MILEAGE REIMB/RGST VOTERS 47.38 AUTO1 AUTO ZONE 08/15/2022 Regular 41.06 59133
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 3758880547 Invoice 08/09/2022 PD VEHICLE MAINT#1803
102-5400-6532 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE PD VEHICLE MAINT#1803 41.06 BADO1 BADGER METER INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 141.90 59134 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 80103136 Invoice 08/12/2022 BEACON HOSTING 7/22
400-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES BEACON HOSTING 7/22 141.90 BPS01 BPS TACTICAL, INC 08/15/2022 589.57 59135
Payable# Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 22034507 Invoice 08/11/2022 ARMENTA - DUTY VEST
100-5400-5013 ARMENTA - DUTY VEST
BRE14 BRENNTAG PACIFIC, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 1,363.80 59136 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount BP1262917 Invoice 08/09/2022 SWIMMING POOL CHLORINE 0.00 1,363.80 100-5616-6002 PARTS SUPPLIES SWIMMING POOL CHLORINE 1,363.80 CAM06 CAM ELECTRIC INC 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 5,049.00 59137 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 125 Invoice 08/12/2022 REQUEST 2: ELECTRICAL 0.00 5,049.00 255-5700-6545 CONTRACTORS REQUEST 2: ELECTRICAL 5,049.00 PLAOS CLAUDIA PLANTILLAS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 51.75 59138 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 10 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable# Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 09/28-29/22 Invoice 08/11/2022 TRAINING MILEAGE
100-5400-6011 TRAINING MILEAGE
CAL21 CPOA 08/15/2022 Regular 500.00 59139
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 321320 Invoice 08/10/2022 PUBLIC RECORDS TRNG
100-5400-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR PUBLIC RECORDS TRNG 500.00 KNO01 DAVE KNOLL PLUMBING 08/15/2022 120.00 59140
Payable# Payable Type Payable Description iscount Amount Payable Amoun Account Number Account Name Item Description
710124 PD PLUMBING SVCS
100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PD PLUMBING SVCS
REE01 EDDIE C. REED 08/15/2022 950.00 59141
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 4703 08/09/2022 POOL & HP SVCS 7/22
100-5610-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ POOL & HP SVCS 7/22 250.00 100-5616-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL & HP SVCS 7/22 700.00 JIMOZ ESTHER DAISY JIMENEZ 08/15/2022 51.75 59142
Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Item Description Distribution Amount
09/28-29/22 08/11/2022 TRAINING MILEAGE
100-5400-6011 TRAINING MILEAGE
FASOO FASTENAL COMPANY 08/15/2022 584.61 59143
Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount CAFR319612 Invoice 08/09/2022 PARK SUPPLIES 0.00 66.43
100-5610-6002 PARTS & SUPPLIES PARK SUPPLIES 66.43
CAFR319658 Invoice 08/11/2022 PW SAFETY SUPPLIES 0.00 518.18 213-5600-6002 PARTS SUPPLIES PW SAFETY SUPPLIES 172.72
400-5600-6002 PARTS & SUPPLIES PW SAFETY SUPPLIES 172.73 401-5600-6002 PARTS SUPPLIES PW SAFETY SUPPLIES 172.73
FIVO2 FIVE CITIES EDA 08/15/2022 0.00 1,085.56 59144
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 012022-2023 Invoice 08/15/2022 FIVE CITIES EDA Q1 0.00 1,085.56 100-5200-6501 MEMBERSHIP DUES FIVE CITIES EDA Q1 1,085.56 CANO7 HERIBERTO CANO 08/15/2022 200.00 59145
Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 06/25/22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC DEP - H.C. 06/25/22
100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP - H.C. 06/25/22 200.00 HER27 HERNANDEZ, MARIA 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59146 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 011-3833-001 Invoice 08/12/2022 UB DEP REIM 0.00 200.00 400-13104 A/R UTILITIES UB DEP REIM 200.00
JOH02 JOHNSTON, CRYSTAL 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59147 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 11 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 065-3372-009 Invoice 08/12/2022 UB DEP REIM 0.00 200.00 400-13104 A/R UTILITIES UB DEP REIM 200.00
T&J01 JOSE M SILVA 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 5,621.12 59148 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount PD 7-22 Invoice 08/11/2022 PD VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 0.00 2,140.97 100-5400-6011 FUEL PD VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 2,140.97
PW 7-22 Invoice 08/11/2022 PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 0.00 3,480.15 100-5620-6011 FUEL - REC. PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 100.24
400-5600-6011 FUEL PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 2,368.50
401-5600-6011 FUEL PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 1,011.41
ACEOO JUNE ACEVES 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 100.00 59149
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07/17/22 Invoice 08/10/2022 POOL DEP - J.A. 07/17/22 0.00 100.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT POOL DEP - J.A. 07/17/22 100.00 KOE01 KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 195.00 59150 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 0000516506 Invoice 08/11/2022 ANIMAL DISPOSAL 7/22 0.00 195.00 100-5410-6021 ANIMAL DISPOSAL ANIMAL DISPOSAL 7/22 195.00 MATO9 MARTHA MATA 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59151
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07/30/22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC DEP - M.M. 07/30/22 0.00 200.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP - M.M. 07/30/22 200.00 PAP01 MARY JANE PAPADOPOULOS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 1,816.75 59152 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 8/8 - 8/12/22 Invoice 08/12/2022 FINANCE SVCS 8/8 - 8/12/22 (42.25H) 0.00 1,816.75 100-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ FINANCE SVCS 8/8 - 8/12/22 (42 1,816.75 FREO7 MCCLATCHY 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 431.40 59153
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 134342 Invoice 08/09/2022 PD RECRUIT PUBLISHING 0.00 431.40 100-5400-6500 PUBLICATIONS PD RECRUIT PUBLISHING 431.40 J0H01 MELANIE JOHNSON 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 45.00 59154 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07-20-22 Invoice 08/05/2022 TRAINING MILEAGE/ MEAL REIM 0.00 45.00 100-5400-6011 TRAINING MILEAGE / MEAL REI 30.63
100-5400-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR TRAINING MILEAGE/MEAL REIM 14.37 MEN18 MENDOCINO AUTO SALES & RE 08/15/2022 752.87 59155 Payable# Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 5116 Invoice UNIT 27 REPAIRS
102-5400-6532 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 27 REPAIRS
5257 Invoice 08/09/2022 UNIT 30 REPAIRS 0.00 426.63
100-5400-6532 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE UNIT 30 REPAIRS 426.63 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 12 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number MUNO1 MUNI METRIX SYSTEMS CORP. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 407.89 59156 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 2208-2628 Invoice 08/12/2022 IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 0.00 407.89 100-5100-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 51.00 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 51.00 100-5400-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 50.98 100-5615-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 50.98 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 50.99 269-6303-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 50.98 400-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 25.49 400-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 25.49 401-5300-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 25.49 401-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES IMAGESILO STORAGE 22/23 25.49 NAVO2 NAVARRO'S AUTO REPAIRS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 2,235.40 59157 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INV-000003 Invoice 08/09/2022 VEHICLE MAINT UNIT 28 0.00 1,001.55 100-5400-6532 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINT UNIT 28 1,001.55 INV-000005 Invoice 08/11/2022 VEHICLE MAINT UNIT 28 0.00 1,233.85 100-5400-6532 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINT UNIT 28 1,233.85 0'B01 NEIL O'BRIEN 08/15/2022 0.00 36.11 59158
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07-20-22 Invoice 08/05/2022 TRAINING MILEAGE / MEAL REIM 0.00 36.11 100-5400-6011 TRAINING MILEAGE / MEAL REI 30.63
100-5400-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR TRAINING MILEAGE/MEAL REIM 5.48 HER26 OLGA HERRERA HERNANDEZ 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 35.00 59159 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08/09/22 Invoice 08/12/2022 PARK DEP - O.H.08/09/22 0.00 35.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT PARK DEP - O.H. 08/09/22 35.00 PRE04 PRECIADO, DAISY 08/15/2022 200.00 59160
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 045-0490-002 Invoice 08/12/2022 UB DEP REIM
400-13104 A/R UTILITIES UB DEP REIM 200.00
RAYO4 RAYMUNDO LOPEZ GUTIERREZ 08/15/2022 0.00 77.68 59161 Payable # Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07-19-22 08/05/2022 TRAINING MILEAGE/MEAL REIM 0.00 77.68 100-5400-6011 TRAINING MILEAGE / MEAL REI 30.63
100-5400-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR TRAINING MILEAGE/MEAL REIM 47.05 RIPO1 REEDLEY IRRIGATION & SUPP 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 59.69 59162 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount RIS-POS02-40420 Invoice 08/09/2022 PARK PARTS 0.00 59.69 100-5610-6002 PARTS & SUPPLIES PARK PARTS 59.69
REN02 RENT A TOILET 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 165.00 59163 8/15/20221:54:04 PM Page 13 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INV/2022/8131 Invoice 08/09/2022 PW RENTAL SVCS 8/22 0.00 165.00 100-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PW RENTAL SVCS 8/22 165.00 RHO01 RHODES INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 445.23 59164
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 35498 Invoice 08/09/2022 DIESEL 0.00 445.23
400-5600-6011 FUEL DIESEL 445.23
CAMO7 Robbie Campbell 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 45.00 59165 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07-20-22 Invoice 08/05/2022 TRAINING MILEAGE / MEAL REIM 0.00 45.00 100-5400-6011 FUEL TRAINING MILEAGE / MEAL REI 30.63
100-5400-6503 TRAVEL, MEETINGS & TR TRAINING MILEAGE/MEAL REIM 14.37 ROBERT SAENZ 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 19,500.0059166
Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08-04-22 Invoice 08/12/2022 TREE REMOVAL ON ACADEMY AVE 0.00 19,500.00 204-5600-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ TREE REMOVAL ON ACADEMY A 19,500.00 SANIR SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR 08/15/2022 0.00 290.00 59167 Payable# Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount C337923 Invoice 08/09/2022 AN PERMIT FEES 22/23 0.00 290.00 401-5600-6583 REGULATORY FEES AN PERMIT FEES 22/23 290.00 STAIU STAR 1 MINI MART 08/15/2022 0.00 543.89 59168
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount PW 7-22 Invoice 08/09/2022 PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 0.00 543.89 400-5600-6011 PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 130.13
401-5600-6011 PW VEHICLE FUEL 7/22 413.76
STA04 STATE FOODS SUPERMARKET 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 1,268.22 59169 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07/18/22-21 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 228.98 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 228.98
07/20/22-47 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 380.09 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 380.09
07/22/22-19 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 22.74 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 22.74
07/25/22-11 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 56.70 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 56.70
07/27/22-268 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 202.59 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 202.59
07/29/22-4 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 65.81 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 65.81
1/25/22:19 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL SUPPLIES 0.00 311.31 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL SUPPLIES 311.31
SYSOO SYSCO OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 1,222.27 59170 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 14 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 384168764 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL/KITCHEN SUPPLIES 0.00 128.50 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL/KITCHEN SUPPLIES 128.50 384194451 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL/KITCHEN SUPPLIES 0.00 63.59 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL/KITCHEN SUPPLIES 63.59 384256598 Invoice 08/05/2022 PA MEAL/KITCHEN SUPPLIES 0.00 1,030.18 269-6303-6504 FOOD SERVICES PA MEAL/KITCHEN SUPPLIES 1,030.18 BUSO2 TEMUJIN JAMES BUSTOS 08/15/2022 Regular 324.05 59171 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 71785219 Invoice 08/10/2022 BUSTOS - UNIFORM 205.83
100-5400-5013 UNIFORM BUSTOS - UNIFORM 205.83
9076-02 Invoice 08/10/2022 BUSTOS - UNIFORM 0.00 118.22 100-5400-5013 UNIFORM BUSTOS - UNIFORM 118.22
MCCO2 TERRY MCCOY 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 335.00 59172
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 07/18-07/22/22 Invoice 08/05/2022 SRO TRAING MILEAGE 0.00 335.00 100-5400-6011 FUEL SRO TRAINNG MILEAGE 335.00
THE05 THE OFFICE CITY 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 92.32 59173 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount IN-1754832 Invoice 08/09/2022 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 51.88 100-5400-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 51.88
IN-1755493 Invoice 08/11/2022 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 30.72 100-5400-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.72
IN-1755645 Invoice 08/11/2022 PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 9.72 100-5400-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES PD OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.72
TOW02 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 2,000.00 59174 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 18748 Invoice 08/12/2022 CONSULT SVCS 8/22 0.00 2,000.00 100-5200-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CONSULT SVCS 8/22 2,000.00 TYLOO TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 2,115.10 59175 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 025-387775 Invoice 08/10/2022 AN HARDWARE /ERP FEE 22/23 0.00 854.41 400-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES AN HARDWARE / ERP FEE 22/23 284.80 401-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES ANN HARDWARE FEE 284.80 402-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES ANN HARDWARE FEE 284.81 025-387776 Invoice 08/10/2022 AN HARDWARE FEE 22/23 0.00 204.69 400-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES AN HARDWARE FEE 22/23 68.23 401-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES ANN HARDWARE FEE 68.23
402-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES ANN HARDWARE FEE 68.23
025-388200 Invoice 08/10/2022 AN UB FEE 22/23 0.00 1,056.00 400-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES AN UB FEE 22/23 352.00
401-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES UB ONLINE ANN FEE 352.00 402-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES UB ONLINE ANN FEE 352.00 CISOO ZULEMA CISNEROS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 200.00 59176 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 15 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 08/06/22 Invoice 08/10/2022 SC DEP - Z.C. 08/06/22 0.00 200.00 100-23101 EVENT RENTAL DEPOSIT SC DEP - Z.C. 08/06/22 200.00 BADO1 BADGER METER INC. 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 861.90 59177 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 80100915 Invoice 06/30/2022 BEACON HOSTING 6/22 0.00 861.90 400-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES BEACON HOSTING 6/22 141.90 400-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES AN SVCS 22/23 240.00
401-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES AN SVCS 22/23 240.00
402-5300-6542 CONTRACT SERVICES AN SVCS 22/23 240.00
CEN19 CENTRAL SANITARY SUPPLY 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 385.40 59178 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 1253954 Invoice 06/30/2022 PARK SUPPLIES 0.00 385.40
100-5610-6002 PARTS & SUPPLIES PARK SUPPLIES 183.80
525-5610-6002 PARTS AND SUPPLIES PARK SUPPLIES 201.60
NAVO2 NAVARRO'S AUTO REPAIRS 08/15/2022 Regular 0.00 4,715.33 59179 Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount INV-000001 Invoice 06/30/2022 VEHICLE MAINT UNIT 28 0.00 4,715.33 100-5400-6532 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINT UNIT 28 4,715.33 PRO01 PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP 08/15/2022 3,432.30 59180 Payable # Payable Type Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 93978 HOUSING ELEMENT 6/22
100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ HOUSING ELEMENT 6/22 93979 Invoice 06/30/2022 CITY PLANNING SVCS 6/22 0.00 1,886.40 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ CITY PLANNING SVCS 6/22 1,886.40 93980 Invoice 06/30/2022 FIG TREE PARK 6/22 0.00 1,004.10 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ FIG TREE PARK 6/22 1,004.10 93981 Invoice 06/30/2022 MANNING AVE ANNEX 6/22 0.00 432.00 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ MANNING AVE ANNEX 6/22 432.00 I DOO VANESSA A. EINERSON 1,626.21 59181
Payable# Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 16701 Invoice 06/30/2022 UB ENVELOPES
400-5300-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIN UB ENVELOPES
401-5300-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES UB ENVELOPES 175.38
402-5300-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES UB ENVELOPES 175.39
16702 Invoice 06/30/2022 UB ENVELOPES 0.00 1,100.06
400-5300-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIN UB ENVELOPES 366.68 401-5300-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES UB ENVELOPES PERMIT 366.69 402-5300-6000 OFFICE SUPPLIES UB ENVELOPES PERMIT 366.69 WILOG WILLDAN ENGINEERING 08/15/2022 Regular 220.00 59182 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 336357 Invoice 06/30/2022 PROF SVCS THRU 5/27/22 220022000 100-5700-6520 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/ PROF SVCS THRU 5/27/22 8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 16 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Payment Type Discount Amount Payment Amount Number PERO1 CALPERS 08/11/2022 Bank Draft 0.00 20,640.12 DFT0000553 Payable # Payable Type Post Date Payable Description Discount Amount Payable Amount Account Number Account Name Item Description Distribution Amount 7/16/22-7/29/22 Invoice 08/11/2022 CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 0.00 20,640.12 100-22104 PERS PAYABLE CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 9,506.07
100-5200-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 305.23 100-5400-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 3,573.23 100-5410-5010 PERS- PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 123.02 100-5610-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 72.25
100-5615-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 58.99
100-5620-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 314.47 100-5700-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 233.85 102-5400-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 279.62 160-5400-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 668.03 203-5600-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 69.39
206-5600-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 55.32
213-5600-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 105.31 269-6303-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 1,235.09 279-5400-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 329.30 281-5420-5010 PERS- PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 157.41 292-5400-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 683.94 400-5200-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 305.23 400-5300-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 477.67 400-5600-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 586.02 401-5200-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 261.63 401-5300-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 477.67 401-5600-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 337.88 402-5300-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 272.95 402-5600-5010 PERS PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 14.07
602-8100-5010 PERS-PENSION CALPERS CONTRIBUTIONS 136.48 Bank Code APBNK Summary
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 196 99 0.00 1,229,423.97
Manual Checks 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 8 0.00 -16,000.00
Bank Drafts 1 1 0.00 20,640.12
EFT's 0.00 0.00
197 108 0.00 1,234,064.09
8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 17 of 18
Check Report Date Range: 08/02/2022 - 08/15/2022
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payable Payment
Payment Type Count Count Discount Payment
Regular Checks 196 99 0.00 1,229,423.97
Manual Checks 0 0.00 0.00
Voided Checks 8 0.00 -16,000.00
Bank Drafts 1 1 0.00 20,640.12
EFT's 0.00 0.00
197 108 0.00 1,234,064.09
Fund Summary
Fund Name Period Amount
999 POOL FUND 8/2022 1,234,064.09
1,234,064.09
8/15/2022 1:54:04 PM Page 18 of 18
#2

OF PARL

MINUTES
City Council of Parlier

SPECIAL MEETING
1921 TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2022
This meeting of the City of Parlier City Council is live streamed and may be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJs3y|cM9NWQGLdwpBCmoAQ DATE:

TIME: 4:30 PM
PLACE: Parlier City Hall
1100 E. Parlier Avenue
Parlier, CA 93648
CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME:

Roll Call: Mayor Alma M. Beltran, Mayor Pro-Temp Trinidad Pimentel, Councilwoman Diane Maldonado, City Clerk Dorothy Garza and Treasurer Michelle Lopez.

Absent: Council woman Sabrina Rodriguez, Council woman Cathryn "Kathy" Solorio.

Staff Present: Financial Director Ellie Vellicesue, City Manager Sonia Hall and Assistant City Manager/Deputy City Clerk Bertha Augustine. *Note: City Attorney Neal Costanzo on Youtube.

FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Alma M. Beltran
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS:

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION

Comments
Humberto Gomez Sr. commented about disregarding their positions on council.

CLOSED SESSION: (4:38 thru

1. Potential Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 One (1) Case.

Closed Session Report
None.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Alma Beltran adjourned the meeting at 5:25 pm
Dorothy Garza- Parlier City Clerk
Resolutions adopted: None.

Ordinances adopted: None

PARLIER MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL OF PARLIER

REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY, AUGUST 4, 2022
This meeting of the City of Parlier City Council is live streamed and may be accessed at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCls3y/cM9NWQGLdwpBCmoAQ CALL TO ORDER/WELCOME:

The City Council of Parlier Regular meeting was held in the City Council Chambers located at 1100 E. Parlier Avenue, Parlier, California 93648. Mayor Alma Beltran called the meeting to order at 6:30 P.M.

ROLL CALL:

Council Present: Mayor Alma M. Beltran, Mayor Pro-Temp Trinidad Pimentel, Councilwoman Diane Maldonado, Council woman Sabrina Rodriguez, Council woman Cathryn "Kathy" Solorio, City Clerk Dorothy Garza and Treasurer Michelle Lopez.

Staff Present: Police Chief David Cerda, Finance Director Ellie Vellicesue, City Attorney Neal Costanzo, City Manager Sonia Hall, City Engineer Javier Andrade and Assistant City Manager/ Deputy City Clerk Bertha Augustine.

FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Alma M. Beltran
INVOCATION: None
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS:

Request addition to the agenda, the approval for Centro Cristiano Familiar to use the Parlier Community Center.

M/S/C: Motion to approve the addition to agenda by Mayor Pro-Temp Pimentel, 2nd by Maldonado, Vote: 5-0 and carried.

PRESENTATIONS/INFORMATIONAL:

PUBLIC COMMENT:

Public Comments:

Resident: asked what is the benefit & cost of Mayor's trip to Washington DC? Answered by Mayor Beltran.

Gloria Hernandez: commented Council need to help people that need help.

Fernando Banuelos- There is nothing wrong about going to conferences. What is wrong is taking family members on city budget. Asked for break down of cost. Mayor explained to Mr. Banuelos, that in today's dangerous world she takes her husband and is paid by her not the city.

Miss Medina commented that is not good to disrespect the council. No need to bicker. If the trip benefits our children she sees nothing wrong with going to DC.

Humberto Gomez Sr.- commented that the Citizens of Parlier need to know the cost information.

Mayor has the right to go on trips for city. We don't trust each other due to lack of information.

Everyone knows about Parlier's location.

Bertha Augustine: explained about the process. She has 20 years of working for the city and the Process has always been the same. The cost of trips is not known until the trip is approved then the process for booking begins and the cost is then known.

Ben Rodriguez asked if the mayor was specifically invited? Mayor answered yes and he was shown the invitation.

Councilwomen S. Rodriguez asked for estimate for room and flight. After receiving the estimate, she moved to approve.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

The City Council:

1. Approved the Check Reports dated July 19, 2022 to August 1, 2022. {*Note: Item 2 of the Consent Calendar was pulled by S. Rodriguez for discussion.}

2. Approved travel and expenses for Mayor to attend the White House Climate Emergency & Energy Security Summit on Monday August 15, 2022 in Washington, D.C.

M/S/C: Motion to approve item #1 of the Consent Calendar by Mayor Pro-Temp Pimentel, 2nd by S. Rodriguez, Vote: 5-0 and carried.

M/S/C: After a brief discussion motion to approve item #2 of the Consent Calendar was by S.

Rodriguez 2nd by Maldonado, vote 5-0 & carried.

REGULAR BUSINESS:

3. SUBJECT: Consideration and Necessary Action on Adoption of the Fresno Council of Governments Approved Measure C Renewal Expenditure Plan and Implementing Guidelines.

The City Council Approved Resolution No. 2022-42, adopting the Fresno Council of Governments (COG) approved Expenditure Plan and Implementing Guideline.

M/S/C: Motion to approve Resolution 2022-42 by Maldonado, 2nd by Mayor Pro-Temp Pimentel: Roll Call Vote: Mayor Beltran-yes, Mayor Pro-Temp Pimentel-yes, Maldonado-yes.

S. Rodriguez-abstain, Solorio-abstain. Vote: 3 yes, 2-abstain, 3-2 & carried.

4. SUBJECT: Consideration and Necessary Action on Submission of CDBG Grant.

The City Council adopted the Resolution No. 2022-43 approving an Application for Funding and the Execution of a Grant Agreement and Any Amendments Thereto from the 2021-2022 Funding Year of the State CDBG Program.

PUBLIC HEARING:
1, Mayor Beltran opens the Public Hearing at 8:33 P.M.

2. Public input/testimony for or against.

Medina awarded contract program by Cal-Rip through the school. More information refer to Breaking the chains. Can get information at City Hall.

City Manager Sonia Hall it is funded by CDBG federal grant.

Ben Rodriguez- City should go door to door. City does not go door to door.

3. Mayor Beltran closed the Public Hearing at 8:45 P.M.

M/S/C: Motion to approve Resolution 2022-43 by S. Rodriguez, 2nd by Maldonado, Vote: 4-1 absent (Pimentel)
(*Note: Pimentel absent 8:45p.m. -8:49 p.m. Solorio absent 8:49p.m. -8:51 p.m.)

5. SUBJECT: Retail Recruitment.

The council authorized the City Manager to enter into a contract for services.

M/S/C: Motion to authorize City Manager to enter into a contract for services by Maldonado, 2nd by S. Rodriguez, Vote: 5-0 & carried.

6. SUBJECT: Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance Amending Parlier Municipal Code (PMC) Adding Section 2.16.040 Adopting a Policy Relating to the Police Department's Use of Military Equipment.

The City Council Waived the First Reading and Introduced Ordinance No. 2022-03 Adopting Policy Relating to Use of Military Equipment and schedule adoption for public hearing.

M/S/C: Motion to waive the first Reading and introduce Ordinance 2022-03 by Mayor Pro- Temp Pimentel, 2º by Maldonado, Vote: 5-0 & carried.

7. SUBJECT: Consideration and Necessary Action on Resolution Declaring Emergency and Authorizing Directly Related and Immediate Action Required by Emergency to Procure Necessary Equipment, Services and Supplies for Extension of Utilities (Water and Sewer) at Manning West of Academy Without Giving Notice for Bids to Let Contracts.

The City Council Adopted Resolution 2022-43A Declaring Emergency and Authorizing Directly Related and Immediate Action Required by Emergency to Procure Necessary Equipment, Services and Supplies for Extension of Utilities (Water and Sewer) at Manning West of Academy Without Giving Notice for Bids to Let Contracts.

M/S/C: Motion to adopt Resolution 2022-43A by S. Rodriguez, 2nd by Mayor Beltran, Vote: 5-0 & carried.

8. SUBJECT: Conduct a Public Hearing and Council's Intention to confirm the collection of the annual assessment for Parlier Landscaping Maintenance and Lighting District No. 1 by resolution The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-44, titled "Confirming Diagram and Assessment, Annual Levy 2022-2023, Landscaping Maintenance and Lighting District No. 1 and authorize the filing of the Resolution and Engineer's Report.

M/S/C: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2022-44 by Solorio, 2nd by S. Rodriguez, Vote: 5-0 & carried.

9. SUBJECT: Request to consider the approval for Centro Cristiano Familiar to use the Parlier Community Center.

The City Council waived all fees and allowed Centro Cristiano Familiar to use the Parlier Community Center every Monday from 5:00 p.m. to 10 p.m.

M/S/C: Motion to approve Centro Cristiano Familiar to use the Parlier Community Center every Monday from 5:00p.m. to 10:00 p.m. by S. Rodriguez, 2nd by Solorio, Vote: 5-0 & carried.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION None.

CLOSED SESSION: (9:42 p.m. thru 10:30 p.m.)

10. Public Employment Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 All Positions.

11. Pending Litigation Pursuant to Government Code §54956.9 Infinity Central Val 2 Parlier LLC v. City of Parlier USDC Case No. 2:19-cv-01607 BRIEF COMMENTS: COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS/COMMENTS:

No Comments:

CITY MANAGER: Sonia Hall
CITY ATTORNEY: Neal Costanzo
CITY COUNCIL:

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Alma Beltran adjourned the Regular Council meeting at 10:30 p.m.

Dorothy Garza - Parlier City Clerk
Resolutions adopted - 2022-42-43-43A & 44
Ordinances adopted - 2022-03 (First Reading and introduced)

OF PARL
MEETING DATE: 08/18/2022
DEPARTMENT: Administration/Engineer

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:

Adoption of the Resolution No. 2022-_ authorizing the contract award of the Parlier 2022 Road Rehab Project to Pavement Coatings Co.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022- _designating and authorizing the City Manager to award construction contracts for the applying fiberized black rock micro-surfacing, asphalt micro grinding, striping, signage in various local streets, in the amount of $577,839.90.

BACKGROUND:

The Parlier 2022 Road Rehab Project involves applying fiberized black rock micro- surfacing, asphalt micro grinding, striping, signage in various local streets in the City of Parlier.

A total of four (4) bids were received, opened, and read aloud at 2:00 p.m. on August 9th, 2022. The lowest responsive bid was submitted by Pavement Coatings Co. in the amount of $577,839.90.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Based on the actual bids, the total estimated project cost for the project is $577,839.90, Funding will come from the SB1 Road Maintenance funds.

Prepared by: Approved by:

Javier Andrade, City Engineer
1 & M

CONSULTING ENGINEERS
220 N Locust Street
Visalia, CA, 93291
559.429.4747
[email protected]
August 11, 2022
Dear Sonia Hall,
We have completed the analysis of the bids received for the Parlier 2022 Road Rehab Project.

The bidders for this project are ranked in the following order, starting with the lowest total project cost:

1. Pavement Coatings Co. $577,839.90

2. Kroeker, Inc. $657,694.66

3. VSS International, Inc. $684,000.00

4. Doolittle Construction LLC $805,355.00
Based on the totality of the bid package and estimated project cost, we have selected Pavement Coatings Co. to move forward in the process. We recommend the City Council of the City of Parlier award this contract to Pavement Coatings Co.

If you may have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at your earliest convenience.

Regards,
Javier Andrade, PE
A&M Consulting Engineers
Principal Civil Engineer
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-_

CITY OF PARLIER

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARLIER, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT TO PAVEMENT COATINGS CO. FOR THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN PARLIER 2022 ROAD REHAB PROJECT

AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER OR MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY
WHEREAS, the Invitation to Bid for the Parlier 2022 Road Rehab Project, was published in the Mid-Valley Times starting on July 14, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the project will comprise of applying fiberized black rock micro-surfacing, asphalt micro grinding, striping, signage in various local streets; and WHEREAS, the following bids for the project were publicly opened and read aloud at the Parlier City Hall on August 09, 2020 at 2:00 p.m.:

CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
Pavement Coatings Co. $ 577,839.90
Kroeker, Inc. $ 657,694.66
VSS International, Inc. $ 684,000.00
Doolittle Construction LLC $ 805,335.00
WHEREAS, the City Engineer's Estimate was $ 650,000.00
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Parlier as follow:

1. Upon the recommendation of the City Engineer that the Street Improvements on the Parlier 2022 Road Rehab Project, be awarded to Pavement Coatings Co., 2150 Bell Ave. Suite 125 Sacramento, CA 95838 in the amount of Five Hundred and Seventy Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Nine Dollars and Ninety Cents ($577,839.90);

2. The City approves a contingency amount of $57,783.99 (10% of contract); and

3. The City Manager or Mayor is authorized to sign the City's standard form of contract for construction projects, as contained in the bid package on behalf of the City of Parlier.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a Resolution duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Parlier at a meeting thereof held on the 18th day of August 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Alma M. Beltran, Mayor
ATTEST:

Dorothy Garza, City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM: #4

OF PART
MEETING DATE: August 18, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development -
Planning

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:

City Council to Consider adoption of a negative declaration and determination of whether to carry out the City of Parlier Fig Tree Park Project.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopts Resolution No. 2022-XX, adopting a negative declaration; adopts Resolution No. 2022-XX, approving a General Plan amendment; and introduces and waives the first reading of Ordinance No. 22-XX to rezone the project site.

BACKGROUND:

In 2017, the Housing Authority of Fresno County demolished an existing 50-unit affordable housing community built in 1964 that occupied approximately 7.59 acres of land within the same parcel. The Housing Authority constructed a new 56-unit affordable housing apartment complex, occupying only approximately 4.82 acres of land in the same parcel. The City has received funding from the California Natural Resource Agency to fund design and construction of a park on part of the remaining area.

PROPOSAL & DISCUSSION:

The proposed Project would construct a new 1.76-acre community park on the vacant

2.77-acre Fresno County Assessor Parcel Number 355-028-071 in central Parlier. The remaining portion of the parcel, at the southeast corner of E. Parlier Avenue and Avila Street, is occupied by the Boys and Girls Club facility, which would not be affected by the Project.

The Project would plant new trees, create a natural bioswale to capture stormwater, and construct a jogging and walking pathway around the perimeter of the park. The Project proposes to install solar light fixtures to provide lighting along the walkway during the evenings once the Project has been completed. The City of Parlier's official park hours are from 7 AM to 10 PM. The Project would include ADA on-site parking. The Project includes restrooms with low-flow toilets and would be designed with environmental sustainability features (e.g., recycled materials, solar lights, environmentally-friendly hardscape).
1 The original APN on which the Oak Grove Apartments and the Boys and Girls Club were situated was 355-041-28T. Following the Housing Authority's subdivision of that parcel, the new APNs assigned are 355-280-07 and -08.

The property is currently owned by Silvercrest, Inc., a subsidiary of the Fresno Housing Authority. Since the City is a public agency, Silvercrest can convey the subject portion of APN 355-280-07 directly to the City via deed without the need for a parcel map, lot line adjustment, or other mapping process.

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT:

REZONING:

The project site is currently zoned R-2 (Low Density / Multiple Family Residential). The applicant proposes to rezone the site to O (Open Conservation) to allow compliance with the General Plan following an amendment from Medium Density Residential to Park. O is a consistent zone district for the Park General Plan land use designation.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

This proposal qualifies as a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an activity directly carried out by a public agency. An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to analyze the potential for significant environmental effects that could result from the project. Based on the results of the IS, a preliminary determination was made that the project would result in less than significant environmental effects and that adoption of a Negative Declaration (ND) would be appropriate. The combined IS/ND was circulated through the State Clearinghouse for a 30-day period running from June 15, 2022 through July 14, 2022. No comments were received.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If the City Council adopts the IS/ND and decides to carry out the project, the City will be responsible for payment of a CEQA filing fee in the amount of $2,598.00 upon filing the notice of determination with the County Clerk. This filing must occur within five business days of Council action.

Prepared by: Approved by:

Jacqueline Lancaster
Assistant City Planner
Attachments:
• CEQA Initial Study
• Resolutions and ordinance
TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION Consent Public Hearing
Info Item Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Action Item Other
Department Report _Continued to: _
Redevelopment Agency
City of Parlier
Fig Tree Park
Final Initial Study - Negative Declaration
August 2022
SCH No. 2022060325
prepared for
City of Parlier
1100 E Parlier Ave
Parlier, CA 93648
prepared by
A&M Consulting Engineers
220 N Locust St
Visalia, CA 93292
^ & M

CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
SECTION 1 - Project Description.

Section 1.1 - Project Title....

Section 1.2 - Lead Agency Name and Address ...

Section 1.3 - Contact Person and Phone Number
Section 1.4 - Project Location.

Section 1.5 - Project Sponsor's Name and Address
Section 1.6 - General Plan Designation. 1
Section 1.7 - Zoning: 1
Section 1.8 - Description of Project... 1
Section 1.9 - Surrounding Land Uses and Setting ....2
Section 1.10 - Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required 2 Section 1.11 - Consultation with California Native American Tribes ...2 SECTION 2 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 7 SECTION 3 - Determination ....8
SECTION 4 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts.. ...9
Section 4.1 - Aesthetics 11
Section 4.2 - Agriculture and Forestry Resources.. ..13 Section 4.3 - Air Quality. .15
Section 4.4 - Biological Resources ..18
Section 4.5 - Cultural Resources 21
Section 4.6 - Energy. 23
Section 4.7 - Geology and Soils.. 25
Section 4.8 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions .. .29
Section 4.9 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials.. .32
Section 4.10 - Hydrology and Water Quality.. ..35
Section 4.11 - Land Use and Planning... ...39
Section 4.12 - Mineral Resources...... ...40
Section 4.13 - Noise... .41
Section 4.14 - Population and Housing.. 44
Section 4.15 - Public Services .. 45
Section 4.16 - Recreation .47
Section 4.17 - Transportation / Traffic.... ..48
Section 4.18 - Tribal Cultural Resources ..50
Section 4.19 - Utilities and Service Systems.. 52
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier
Page i
Table of Contents
Section 4.20 - Wildfire ... ..55
Section 4.21 - Mandatory Findings of Significance ... .56 List of Figures
Figure 1.1 - Project Location Map ... 4
Figure 1.2 - City of Parlier General Plan Land Use Plan* 5 Figure 1.3 - City of Parlier Zoning Map* 6
List of Tables
Table 4.13.1 - Vibration Criteria for Structural Damage.. 42 Table 4.13.2 - Vibration Criteria for Human Annoyance .42 Table 4.13.3 - Representative Source Levels for Construction Equipment............................ ....43 List of Appendices
Appendix A - Native American Heritage Commission Letter and Native American Tribe Correspondence
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier
Page ii
Section 1
Project Description
SECTION 1 - Project Description
Section 1.1 - Project Title
City of Parlier Fig Tree Park
Section 1.2 - Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Parlier
1100 E Parlier Ave
Parlier, CA 93648
Section 1.3 - Contact Person and Phone Number
Sonia Hall, City Manager
(559) 646-3545
Section 1.4 - Project Location
The Project is in the City of Parlier, on the northeast corner of Avila Street & Tulare Street. The coordinates of the proposed project are: 36°36'39.5"N 119°32'02.6"W See Figure 1.1.

Section 1.5 - Project Sponsor's Name and Address
City of Parlier
1100 E Parlier Ave
Parlier, CA 93648
Section 1.6 - General Plan Designation
The City of Parlier General Plan Land Use Map designates the proposed Project site as Medium Density Residential. See Figure 1.2.

Section 1.7 - Zoning:

The City of Parlier Zoning Map designates the Project site as zoned for R-2 Low Density / Multiple Family Residential. See Figure 1.3.

Section 1.8 - Description of Project
The proposed Project would construct a new community park on a portion of the undeveloped area of Fresno County Assessor Parcel Number 355-041-24T in central Parlier. The Project would plant new trees, create a natural bioswale to capture stormwater, and construct a jogging and walking pathway around the perimeter of the park. The Project proposes to install solar light fixtures to provide lighting along the walkway during the evenings once the Project has been completed. The City of Parlier's official park hours are from 7AM to 10PM. The Project would include ADA on-site parking. The Project includes restrooms with low-flow toilets and would be designed with environmental sustainability features (i.e. recycled materials, solar lights, environmentally friendly hardscape, etc.) The proposed Project would cover approximately 1.76 acres of land. In 2017, the Housing Authority of Fresno County demolished an existing 50-unit affordable housing community built in 1964 that occupied approximately 7.59 acres of land within the same parcel. The Housing Authority constructed a new 56-unit affordable housing apartment complex, occupying only approximately 4.82 acres Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 1 ends

Section 1
Project Description
of land in the same parcel. The remaining approximately 2.77 acres of parcel remains undeveloped, except for the Boys and Girls Club building located on the southeast corner of E Parlier Ave and Avila Street. This building was not affected by the demolition of the previous housing community or the construction of the new affordable housing project. Similarly, this building would not be affected by the Project.

In order for the Project to comply with the City of Parlier's General Plan, an amendment to the General Plan Land Use designation is necessary. The Land Use designation for the portion of land that is to be developed by this Project would need to be changed from Medium Density Residential to Park. After the Land Use designation amendment has been approved, the portion of land will be rezoned from R-2 (Low Density / Multiple Family Residential) to O (Open Space).

Section 1.9 - Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The proposed Project would be located within the undeveloped portion of Fresno County Assessor Parcel Number 355-041-24T in central Parlier on the northeast corner of Avila Street and Tulare Street. Adjacent to the east of the proposed Project location, there is an affordable housing project operated by the Housing Authority of Fresno County. To the east across Bigger Street, there is a commercial development. To the north across Parlier Ave, there is an open space area. To the west across Avila Street, there is City Hall and Community Center.

To the south across Tulare Street, there are single-family residences. The proposed Project would be surrounded by developed areas.

Section 1.10 - Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required

1. City of Parlier

2. California Natural Resources Agency

3. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

4. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
Section 1.11 - Consultation with California Native American Tribes Government Codes Section 65352.3 and Section 65352.4 require local governments to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to cultural places when creating or amending General Plans, Specific Plans and Community Plans Public Resources Codes Section 21080.3.1 and Section 21080.3.2 requires public agencies to consult with California Native American tribes identified by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) for the purpose of avoiding, protecting, and/or mitigating impacts to tribal cultural resources as defined, for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) projects
On February 16, 2021, the City of Parlier contacted the NAHC to request the most up to date CEQA Tribal Consultation List per Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 and Section 21080.3.2; as well as per Government Code Section 65352.3 and 65352.4
The NAHC responded on March 10, 2021 and provided the contact information Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 2 ends

Section 1
Project Description
for 14 Native American Tribes who have been traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area:
• Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians
• Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians
• Cold Springs Rancheria
• Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal Government
• Dunlap Band of Mono Indians
• Kings River Choinumni Farm Tribe
• Nashville Enterprise Miwok-Maidu-Nishinam Tribe
• North Fork Mono Tribe
• Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians
• Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe
• Table Mountain Rancheria
• Traditional Choinumni Tribe
• Tule River Indian Tribe
• Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band
On April 1, 2021 each of the Native American tribes were mailed a letter informing each designated contact person from each Native American tribe about the City's proposed Project and the opportunity to provide feedback and determine if formal consultation would be necessary. Each Native American tribe was afforded the 30- and 90-day period to provide feedback, as required by AB 52 and SB 18, respectively.

On May 3, 2021, the City received an email correspondence from Elizabeth D.

Hutchins-Kipp, the Tribal Chairperson of the Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians, indicating that they had no comment on the Project; but would like to be notified should anything of cultural significance were discovered during construction.

On May 24, 2021, the City received an email correspondence from Shana Powers, the Cultural Director of the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, indicating that they had no comment on the project due to proximity; instead, she deferred to Table Mountain Rancheria. As of the time of preparation of this document, the City has not received any further communications from any of the Native American Tribes indicating interest or any concerns about the proposed project. The representatives from Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians and Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe were the only individuals who replied within the 30- and 90-day deadlines established under AB 52 and SB 18, respectively; and neither indicated an interest to initiate additional formal consultation. Therefore, the City has satisfied the intent of both regulations ensuring California Native American tribes had sufficient time to provide comments on the proposed Project.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 3 ends

Section 1
Project Description

AVILA AVE

APARTMENT

COMPLEX

CITY OF PARLIER AVE

PARLIER

PARLIER CITY HALL

JUNIOR HIGH
SCHOOL

AVILA ST OAK GROVE BIGGER ST NEWMARK AVE

MULTI-FAMILY

COMPLEX

FIG TREE PARK TULARE AVE

PROJECT LOCATION

FETT ST PETTIT ST HERRING AVE

PARLIER GARDEN

APARTMENT

COMPLEX

TUOLUMNE ST
Figure 1.1 - Project Location Map
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 4 ends

Section 1
Project Description

WIRENE RD

THIRD ST
MERO
R

SECOND ST

OROZCO CT
FIRST ST. / ST

FRESNO ST

TULARE ST
JST

EVA DONNA ST PETTIT AVE

MERCED ST

BIGGER ST TUOLUMNE ST H ST

ERIC AVE STANISLAUS ST

KELLY AVE CANDICE AVE HADAR AVE ORITAVE MULBERRY LN

NEWMARK AVE
KING AVE KINGS ST *OGRESSO DR

ZEDIKERAVE
INDEPENDENCIA ST Health
MAYA AVE Center
Figure 1.2 - City of Parlier General Plan Land Use Plan* *This map was created Neighborhood Commercial Low Density Residential Light Industrial Park
by Yamabe & Horn
Engineering, Inc. Community Commercial Medium Low Density Residential Heavy Industrial Open Space General Commercial Medium Density Residential Public Facilities Agricultural Office High Density Residential Cemetery Sphere of Influence Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 5 ends

Section 1
Project Description

THIRD ST

SECOND ST

FIRST ST
"FRESNO ST

TULARE ST
ST

PETTIT HERRING AVE

MERCED ST

TUOLUMNE ST
ST

STANISLAUS ST
rAVE
Figure 1.3 - City of Parlier Zoning Map*
*This map was created by Yamabe & Horn • Open Space C-P Administrative & Professional Offices Engineering, Inc. P-F Public Facility
C-4 Central Trading
R-1 Single Family Residential C-5 General Commercial
R-2 Low Density / Multiple Family Residential M-1 Manufacturing R-3 Medium Density / Multiple Family Residential L. CityLimits - Sphere of Influence
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 6 ends

Section 2
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
SECTION 2 - Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
Any environmental factor checked in the table below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist in the following pages.

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources • Energy
Greenhouse Gas Hazards & Hazardous
• Geology / Soils •
Emissions Materials
Hydrology / Water •
Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources
Noise • Population / Housing • Public Services
• Recreation Transportation • Tribal Cultural
Resources
Utilities / Service Mandatory Findings of
• Wildfire
Systems Significance
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 7 ends

Section 3
Determination
SECTION 3 - Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

X I find that the proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed Project MAY have a "potentially significant impact or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed Project, nothing further is required Signature / Title Date
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 8 ends

Section 4
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
SECTION 4 - Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses," as described in (5) below, may be cross- referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration.

Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 9 ends

Section 4
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 10 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 1
Aesthetics
Section 4.1 - Aesthetics
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section Impact Mitigation Impact Impact 21099, would the Project: Incorporated
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? • X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including,
but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and • X
historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage • X point). If the Project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the •
area?
Impact Evaluation

4.1-a) - Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. There are no officially designated scenic vistas or scenic highways within the vicinity of the proposed Project. The California State Scenic Highway System Map' shows that the nearest scenic highway to the Project is State Route 180, approximately nine miles northeast of the Project. The National Wild and Scenic River System? shows that the nearest scenic river to the Project site would be the Kings Wild and Scenic River, more than 40 miles northeast of the Project site. Neither of these officially designated scenic resources are visible from the Project site. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the Project would have adverse effects on a scenic vista.

4.1-b) - Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. As evidenced by the California State Scenic Highway System Map, the nearest scenic highway to the proposed Project is State Route 180 at approximately nine miles northeast of the Project. The proposed Project is surrounded by local streets that are not designated as scenic highways; therefore, it is not anticipated for scenic resources within a State scenic highway would be negatively impacted by the Project.
' Caltrans, California State Scenic Highways -
https://dot.ca.gov/programs/desiqn/lap-landscape-architecture-and-communitv-livabilitv/lap-liv-j-scenic-hiahwavs 2 US. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wild and Scenic Rivers System - https://www.rivers.gov/california.php Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 11 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 1
Aesthetics

4.1-c) - In non-urbanized areas, would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? If the Project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
No Impact. The proposed Project consists of the construction of a new community park. This would develop a currently vacant piece of land with little to no groundcover and a few existing trees. Upon the completion of this Project, the visual character of the surrounding area would complete the overall aesthetic quality of the adjacent Oak Grove Apartments affordable housing project. Therefore, no adverse impact is anticipated. The Project would plant new trees, create a natural bioswale to capture stormwater, and construct a jogging and walking pathway around the perimeter of the park.

4.1-d) - Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less than Significant Impact. During the construction of the Project, all work would be performed during daylight hours, typically between 7AM and 5PM. Excessive light or glare generated by trucks delivering construction materials and other construction equipment onsite would be temporary and would be stationary for short periods of time. The Project proposes to install solar light fixtures to provide lighting along the walkway during the evenings once the Project has been completed. These light fixtures would be required to have a cover around the luminaire to direct the light downward to only illuminate the proposed walkway, which will minimize light glare and spillage onto adjacent properties. All solar light fixtures would be programmable to turn on only after sunset, thus eliminating the potential for adverse daytime view effects once the Project is complete. Therefore, the impacts caused by light or glare that might Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 12 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 2
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Section 4.2 - Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section Impact Mitigation Impact Impact 21099, would the Project: Incorporated
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the • X
California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a • • Williamson Act contract? X
c) conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public • X Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government
Code section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? • X
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result in X conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
Impact Evaluation
Mama gang an onion ram in ali Rears yang, bran.
agricultural use?
No Impact. The Project would be located within the limits of the City of Parlier, a small community in Fresno County, CA. The most recent available Important Farmland Map from the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program shows the Project would be located in an area mapped as Urban and Built-Up Land. The area was previously used as an affordable housing community and was demolished and remains undeveloped. The Project would result in the development of a park on the vacant, previously developed area. There is no farmland associated with the Project.

Therefore, there is no potential for the conversion of Prime, Unique, or Important farmland.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 13 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 2
Agriculture and Forestry Resources

4.2-b) - Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
No Impact. The Project is currently zoned as R-2 (Low Density Residential / Multiple Family Residential). The Project requires an amendment to the General Plan Land Use designation to change the existing zoning from R-2 to O (Open Space). According to the Fresno County Williamson Act Parcels Map?, the parcel for the Project is not under a Williamson Act contract Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act contract.

4.2-c) - Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
No Impact. The Project parcel is currently zoned for Residential Use. There is no forest land within the City of Parlier city limits. Therefore, there would not be any conflict with zoning for forest land

4.2-d) - Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No Impact. See discussion 4.2-c).

4.2-e) - Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No Impact. See discussions 4.2-a) through 4.2-c).
3 Fresno County Williamson Act Parcels, California, 2015 https://databasin.org/datasets/6871c77c876d421b985b1b70ee1640f5/ Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 14 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 3
Air Quality
Section 4.3 - Air Quality
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
• •
applicable air quality plan?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is • • X • non-attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? X •
Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of X •
people?
Impact Evaluation

4.3-a) - Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
Less than Significant Impact. The City of Parlier is within the jurisdiction of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District), which monitors air quality within the eight-county San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). The SJVAB has been designated as nonattainment for multiple state and federal health-based air quality standards. The Air Pollution Control District has published several Air Quality Attainment Plan documents to help the SJVAB comply with Federal and State Clean Air Act requirements. These include:
2016 Ozone Plan

2. 2016 PM2.5 Plan

3. 2007 PM1o Maintenance Plan and Request for Redesignation In accordance with the District's Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI), revised in 2015, the established thresholds of significance for criteria pollutant emissions during construction are the following (page 65&80 of the GAMAQI document):

Criteria Pollutant Threshold (Tons Per Year)
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 100
Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) 10
Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 10
Sulfur Oxide (SOx) 27
Particulate Matter (PM10) 15
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 15
To streamline the process of assessing significance of criteria pollutant emissions from commonly Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 15 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 3
Air Quality
encountered projects, the District developed the Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) 4 screening tool. Using project type and size, the District has pre-quantified emissions and determined a size below which it is reasonable to conclude that a project would not exceed applicable thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants. The SPAL screening tool uses the project type, size, and number of vehicle trips. The District has pre-quantified emissions and determined values below what is reasonable to conclude that a project would not exceed applicable thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants. This Project does not exceed the parameters of any of the types of projects for which the District has pre-quantified emissions because this Project is limited to the construction of a community park and does not include the construction of a facility that would generate HHDT (Heavy-Heavy Duty Trucks) or non-HHDT trips. The screening tool establishes that a project found to be less than the pre-quantified parameters has no possibility of exceeding criteria pollutant emissions thresholds. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that this project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the District's Air Quality Attainment Plan by way of exceeding the criteria pollutant thresholds of significance.

During construction, the Project would be subject the District's Regulation VIII and Rule 9510 to reduce fugitive dust and construction exhaust emissions. This requires that dust emission controls be implemented at the construction site, which may include the regular application of water over exposed areas, dust suppressants, and reducing vehicle speeds on unpaved and exposed areas within the construction site.

4.3-b) - Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
Less than Significant Impact. The criteria pollutants for which the SJVAB is under nonattainment are ozone, PMo and PM2.5. The applicable thresholds of significance for these pollutants are listed in discussion 4.3-a). This Project is expected to contribute to the nonattainment status of these pollutants during the construction phase. Emissions generated would be temporary and be generated for approximately 6 months. The activities with potential to generate emissions may include, but are not limited to, excavation, vehicle exhausts from construction machinery and employee vehicle trips, and the movement of construction equipment over unpaved surfaces. By utilizing the District's SPAL screening tool, it is evident that the Project has no possibility that it would exceed criteria pollutant emission thresholds. Nevertheless, necessary fugitive dust control measures will be implemented in accordance with the District's Regulation Ill to mitigate how much emissions are generated during construction.

Since the Project would result in the construction of an approximately two-acre community park that would include walking and biking paths to encourage alternative modes of transportation and reduce the amount of vehicle trips and an addition of trees, it would not result in significant emissions of criteria pollutants; thus, would not contribute to a long-term cumulative increase in criteria pollutants. Impacts would be less than significant. 4 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) http://www.valleyair.org/transportation/CEQA%20Rules/GAMAQI-SPAL.PDF Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 16 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 3
Air Quality

4.3-c) - Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors are defined by the District as facilities that house or attract children, the elderly, people with illnesses or others who are sensitive to the effects of air pollutants. These facilities may include hospitals, schools, convalescent facilities, parks, and residential areas. The Boys and Girls club is located adjacent to the property.

The District's GAMAQI guidelines classifies projects that have the potential to cause long-term public health risk impact into two types:

Type A Projects: projects that will place new toxic sources in the vicinity of existing receptors
Type B Projects: projects that will place new receptors in the vicinity of existing toxic sources
The Project is neither a Type A nor a Type B project as defined by the District. There would not be any new facilities constructed that would result in a new permanent toxic source within the vicinity of existing sensitive receptors. Similarly, the Project would not construct a sensitive receptor within the vicinity of an existing toxic source. The Project would replace the stormwater pipes and increase capacity of the stormwater basins to prevent future flooding of the residential areas during heavy storm events. As previously stated in discussions 4.3-a) and 4.3-b), the sources of emissions and pollutants that are reasonably expected to be generated by the Project include excavation, vehicle exhausts from construction machinery and employee vehicle trips, and the movement of construction equipment over unpaved surfaces. The emissions and the impacts of these emissions would be localized and temporary; therefore, the impacts are considered less than significant.

4.3-d) - Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site location has residential housing to the east and south; however, while construction-related emissions are expected to occur, the effects would be less than significant because the emissions would be localized and temporary and limited to dust from site excavation and construction vehicle emissions.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 17 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 4
Biological Resources
Section 4.4 - Biological Resources
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a)
through habitat modifications,
ecies in local or regional plans, policies, •
gulations, or by the California Department of Fi
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or b • • X • he California Department of Fish and Game or US
Fish and Wildlife Service?
substantial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, • X vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife • X corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree X
preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation • X
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
Impact Evaluation

4.4-a) - Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Less than Significant Impact. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS) does not show that any critical habitat exists within the project site. ECOS contains data for active proposed and final critical habitat for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Joint Fish and Wildlife Service/National Marine Fisheries Service (FWS/NMFS) threatened and endangered species. ECOS is a FWS-sponsored platform for FWS data. The ECOS critical 5 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Environmental Conservation Online System - https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/critical-habitat) Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 18 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 4
Biological Resources
habitat online mapper includes proposed and final critical habitat for species listed as Threatened and Endangered by the FWS, or that are jointly managed by FWS/NMFS. The proposed Project does not contain habitat or sensitive natural communities which require protection. The entirety of the Project would occur within the City of Parlier where the surrounding area is built-up with residences and commercial facilities, precluding the establishment of habitat attractive to special- status species. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.4-b) - Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Less than Significant Impact. See discussion 4.4-a).

4.4-c) - Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory® does not show that there are any wetlands within the Project site. This project development does not contain any other habitat or sensitive natural communities which require protection. There are no rivers or lakes, precluding impacts to fish species. The wetlands mapper is intended to provide information on the status, extent, characteristics and functions of wetlands, riparian, and deep-water habitats.

Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.4-d) - Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's National Wetlands Inventory does not show any wetlands within the project site. The Project's development does not contain any other habitat or sensitive natural communities which require protection. There are no rivers or lakes, precluding impacts to fish species. The Project site is not subject to a Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state Habitat Conservation Plan. The entirety of the Project would occur within the City of Parlier, where parcels are developed, precluding the establishment of habitat attractive to special-status species. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.4-e) - Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The proposed Project is within a built-up part of the City of Parlier, and the City of Parlier does not have a local policy or ordinance protecting biological resources located within the Project site. The proposed community park is not anticipated to conflict with any local policies or ordinances. Therefore, there would be no impact.
6 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory - https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 19 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 4
Biological Resources

4.4-f) - Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The proposed Project is not located in an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan; thus, no impact is anticipated to occur.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 20 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 5
Cultural Resources
Section 4.5 - Cultural Resources
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource as defined in § • X 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant • • X c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred • outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Impact Evaluation

4.5-a) - Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5?
No Impact. After conducting a search on the California Department of Parks and Recreation's Office of Historic Preservation's Built Environment Resource Directory it was found that the parcel for the proposed Project was listed for cultural resources that have been evaluated for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources. The evaluation was determined ineligible for the National Register of Historic Places.

The Proiect location was also not listed as an Office of Historic Preservation's California Registered Historical Resource® Landmark. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.5-b) - Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
Less than Significant Impact. The Office of Historic Preservation's California Historical Landmarks® revealed that the Project did not include any registered landmarks in the City of Parlier. Previous Historic Property Surveys conducted for the Project site included historical era buildings; however, they were not eligible for listing as mentioned above. The Project site was previously part of an affordable housing complex, built over 60 years ago, which has been demolished and remains vacant. Since the Project site has been previously disturbed, it is highly unlikely for this Project to have a negative effect on an archeological resource. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
7 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) - https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page id=30338
8 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, California Historical Resources - https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/listedresources
9 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, California Historical Landmarks by County- https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page id=21387
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 21 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 5
Cultural Resources

4.5-c) - Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?
Less than Significant Impact. Given that the Project site has been previously developed for over 60 years, there is little to no possibility that this project would potentially disturb any human remains anywhere along the Project's limits. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are discovered within the limits of the Project, the contractor will be obligated to stop all work and request that the county coroner investigate the circumstances of any death and make a recommendation for how to treat and dispose the human remains. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code 7050.5, if the Fresno County coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the NAHC. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 22 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 6
Energy
Section 4.6 - Energy
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary •
• X
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
• X
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Impact Evaluation

4.6-a) - Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
Less than Significant Impact. Energy consumption during the construction phase would be in the form of fuel usage for the operation of the construction machinery and equipment, transportation of materials, and worker vehicle trips. The fuel utilized by the trucks transporting the construction materials and equipment to the job site, as well as the fuel consumed by worker vehicle trips, are essential in order to carry out the Project. Thus, the fuel consumed by those two categories of vehicles would not be wasteful or unnecessary. The proposed Project would comply with the SJVAPCD air quality regulations regarding the limitation of vehicle and equipment idling during construction to the extent feasible. By adhering to the standard regulations and guidelines of the SJVAPCD, the Project would minimize fuel consumption to the extent feasible during construction. Therefore, construction-related fuel consumption at the Project site would not result in inefficient, wasteful, nor unnecessary energy use.

After completion of the construction activities, the energy consumption by the Project would be limited to lighting, restroom use and vehicle trips. Some of the lighting for this Project would be solar powered to help reduce additional electricity usage and reduce the impact to the City of Parlier Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) energy grid. The Park lights would only operate during dark hours. The restrooms will require energy only when in use during park hours and would include energy efficient lighting and low-flow toilets. The Project would result in an increase of vehicle trips. However, the Project would be a community park located within residential areas that are within walking and bicycling distance. The Project would also implement walking and bicycle paths to encourage walking and bicycle trips and reduce vehicle trips. Therefore, the Project would not have a significant impact on wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary energy consumption. Impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 23 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 6
Energy

4.6-b) - Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Less than Significant Impact. By complying with the SJVAPCD air quality regulations regarding the limitation of vehicle and equipment idling during construction, minimizing unnecessary vehicle trips, and utilizing electric equipment for construction where feasible, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct any State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. Because the Project would comply with the California Green Building Standards Code for energy efficient and water consumption standards, the Project would not significantly interfere with any existing or future energy efficiency state or local plan. Impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 24 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 7
Geology and Soils
Section 4.7 - Geology and Soils
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other • • •
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? • •
ili) Seismic-related ground failure, including
• • X
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? • • X
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? • c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the
Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposa | L X systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of wastewater?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological • resource or site or unique geologic feature?
(continued on next page)
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 25 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 7
Geology and Soils
Impact Evaluation

4.7-a(i) - Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?
No Impact. The Project would not be located within a delineated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone as evidenced by the Seismic Hazard Zones and Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones map'° maintained by the California Geological Survey. The nearest fault to the Project site is the Nunez Fault near Coalinga, CA, which is approximately 60 miles southwest of the City of Parlier.

Therefore, there would be no possibility that the Project would expose people or structures to a substantial adverse effect due to a rupture of a known earthquake fault within or near the Project site. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.7-a(ii) - Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking?
Less than Significant Impact. See discussion 4.7-a(i). Although the Project does not have a known active fault passing through or near the site, the City of Parlier is located within a seismically active region. Ground shaking can occur due to the fault zones further away from the City. The largest and closest major fault is the San Andreas Fault Zone, located approximately 70 miles southwest of the Project site. Due to the Project site's distance from the San Andreas Fault Zone, ground shaking that may be experienced at the site would not be any greater than what is expected for the surrounding area. Further, the Project does not propose to construct permanent habitable structures that could expose people to substantial adverse effects due to strong seismic ground shaking. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone map shows that the nearest major liquefaction and ground shaking zone is approximately 60 miles southwest of the Project Site.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.7-a(iii) - Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Less than Significant Impact. See discussions 4.7-a(i) and 4.7-a(ii). 10 California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey Information Warehouse, Regulatory Maps and Reports https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 26 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 7
Geology and Soils

4.7-a(iv) - Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving landslides? No Impact. See discussions 4.7-a(i) through 4.7-a(iii) above. The proposed Project would be located in a region that is flat without any significant slopes. Thus, there is no likelihood that the Project would expose people to substantial adverse effects due to landslides. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.7-b) - Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less than Significant Impact. Soil erosion could occur during the construction phase of the Project. To minimize the potential for soil erosion, the contractor would be required to comply with the General Construction Permit, Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ", issued by the State Water Resources Control Board. Compliance with this order is done through the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which would estimate sediment risk from construction activities, and outline Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be implemented to minimize pollution of stormwater due to construction activities. Through the implementation of a SWPPP and use of the BMPs, impacts would be less than significant.

4.7-c) - Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? No Impact. See discussion 4.7-d).

4.7-d) - Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? No Impact. The Project site would not be within an area known to contain expansive soils.

Additionally, the general area of the Project site and surrounding lands are flat and do not have any significant slopes that could pose a threat to life or property within the Project site or its surrounding areas. The potential for liquefaction, slope instability, landslides or debris flows due to expansive soils in the area is not significant and no impact is expected to occur.

4.7-e) - Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?
No Impact. This Project would not include the installation of a septic tank, nor would it involve ny type or wastewater disposal directly into the soil; theretore, no impact would occur. Th roiect's restrooms would be connected to existing City infrastructur 11 California State Water Resources Control Board, Construction Stormwater General Permits - https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/constpermits.html Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 27 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 7
Geology and Soils

4.7-f) - Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site has been previously disturbed which included a community housing complex for over 60 years that was recently demolished and remains vacant.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that this Project would result in a negative impact or destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. The surrounding area of the project contains land developed with sidewalks, housing, and commercial establishments.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 28 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 8
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Section 4.8 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the X environment?
Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of • X greenhouse gases?
Impact Evaluation

4.8-a) - Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, was the primary state law aimed at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. AB 32 gave the California Air Resources Board the authority to monitor and regulate sources of GHG emissions to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Greenhouse gases include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride.

Thereafter, SB 32 was signed in 2016 and expanded on AB32 goals by requiring a reduction in GHG emissions to 40% below the 1990 levels by 2030. During the construction phase of this Project, it is expected that GHG emissions would occur; however, construction activities are expected to last for approximately 6 months. Once construction is completed, the Project would generate GHG emissions through electricity use and vehicle trips. The Project would include the use of solar powered lights to reduce the impact to the City's PG&E energy grid. The Project would include walking and biking paths to encourage the reduction of vehicle trips and increase alternative modes of transportation. As previously discussed in Factor 3(Air Quality) and Factor 6 (Energy), the Project would adhere to the SJVAPCD regulations and guidelines to minimize idling of construction vehicles and equipment. Additionally, as mentioned in discussion 4.3-a) of Factor 3 (Air Quality), by utilizing the SJVAPCD's Small Project Analysis Level (SPAL) process, it was established that projects found to be less than the pre-quantified parameters have no possibility of exceeding criteria pollutant emissions thresholds. This Project does not exceed the parameters of any of the types of projects for which the District has pre-quantified emissions; therefore, it can be concluded that this project would not have a significant impact on the environment because of GHG emissions generated by this project, either directly or indirectly.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 29 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 8
Greenhouse Gas Emissions

4.8-b) - Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. In August 2008 the SJVAPCD's Governing Board adopted the Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP)'2. The Plan outlines recommended measures and guidance for the reduction of GHG emissions associated with development projects. The guidance relies on the use of performance-based standards, also known as Best Performance Standards (BPS), to assess significance of project specific greenhouse gas emissions on global climate change.

Projects implementing BPS would be determined to have a less than cumulatively significant impact. Otherwise, demonstration of a 29% reduction in GHG emissions, from Business-as-Usual (BAU), is required to determine that a project would have a less than cumulatively significant impact. BAU is defined by the District as the total baseline emissions for all emissions sources within the development type, projected for the year 2020, assuming no change in GHG emissions per unit of activity as established for the baseline period, 2002-2004.

The AB 32 Scoping Plan established a Cap-and-Trade program, which established a cap for each compliance period of the program, and emission reductions would increase as the cap declines over time. The Cap-and-Trade program includes up to 85% of the State's emission sources (electricity, transportation fuels, natural gas, and industrial sectors). Cap-and-Trade programs are market-driven and do not specify how emission reductions will be achieved; however, emission reductions are achieved at the facility level using the most cost-effective methods available. The Scoping Plan was released on October 15, 2008 and approved at a California Air Resources Board's (ARB) Board hearing on December 12, 2008. A key aspect of ARB's approach is that it recognized that different GHG thresholds of significance may apply to projects in different sectors because some sectors contribute more than others and there are different levels of emissions reductions expected from different sectors to meet the State's climate objectives. Consistent with ARB's Scoping Plan, the District established significance thresholds for Stationary Sources and Residential and Commercial Developments. A threshold of significance is an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect. Compliance with a significance threshold would normally result in a determination that project would not have a significant environmental impact.

Additionally, projects achieving performance-based standards that have been demonstrated to be "Best Performance Standards" (BPS) would be considered to have a less than cumulative significant impact on global climate change. Further, projects complying with an approved GHG emission reduction plan or GHG mitigation program, which avoids or substantially reduces GHG emissions within the geographic area in which the project is located would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. Projects complying with an approved GHG emission reduction plan or GHG mitigation program would not be required to implement BPS. For development projects, BPS includes project design elements, land use decisions, and technologies that reduce GHG emissions. Due to the variety of development project types, it is difficult for the District to establish a single set of standards that would be applicable to all project types. Instead, the District established a list of GHG emission reductions measures with pre-quantified GHG emission reduction effectiveness. Projects implementing BPS and reducing GHG emissions by 29% through any combination of GHG emission reduction measures, would be considered to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact on global climate change.
12 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) - https://www.valleyair.org/Programs/CCAP/CCAP_idx.htm
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 30 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 8
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
However, this Project does not intend to construct a residential, commercial, or industrial facility that could be classified as a stationary source of GHG emissions. The scope of the Project is limited to the construction of a community park and is not anticipated to generate a significant amount of GHG emissions upon complete, as discussed in impact a) above. This Project is not one where the emission reduction measures recommended in the District's CCAP can be implemented. The expected GHG emissions expected to be generated by this Project would be during the construction phase caused by on- and off-road vehicles and electricity use and vehicle trips post constructions. The use of vehicles and electricity generated falls under the emissions sources that participates in the State's Cap-and-Trade program in compliance complies with ARB's regulation. The District's Climate Action Plan recognizes that the Cap-and-Trade program is a state-wide plan for reducing and mitigating GHG emissions for various targeted sectors. In June 2014, the District issued 2025 Annual Progress Report (APR-2025)13 which established that GHG emissions trom the combustion ot any tuel produced, imported and/or delivered in California are mitigated under the Cap-and-rade program. Therefore, GHG emissions caused by this Project are anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 13d- Trade Program Ap:/w. aleval Drailes per eries PR of 3, nificance for Project subject to ARB'S GHIG Cap- Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 31 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 9
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Section 4.9 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a)
• •
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset • X •
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste • • X within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
• X
environment?
e) or a project located within an airport land use pla
r, where such a plan has not been adopted, withi
two miles of a public airport or public use airport, X
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X •
evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of • • X
(continued on next page)
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 32 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 9
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Impact Evaluation

4.9-a) - Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant Impact. According to the Department of Toxic Substances Control's data management system EnviroStor 4, the Project site is not located on the list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The Project would result in the construction of a community park and would not include the transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials once completed. During the construction phase of the Project, the operation of on- and off-road vehicles and equipment is expected to generate exhaust emissions. However, as stated in discussion 4.3-a) of Factor 3 (Air Quality) and in discussion 4.8-b) of Factor 8 (Greenhouse Gas Emissions), these types of emissions have been determined to have a less than significant impact. Therefore, Impacts would be less than significant.

4.9-b) - Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. See discussion 4.9-a).

4.9-c) - Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located approximately 0.25 miles from Parlier Junior High School. However, as mentioned in discussion 4.9-a), the Project will have a less than significant emission of hazardous material to the public or environment. Hazardous materials may be emitting temporarily during the construction phase of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant impact.

4.9-d) - Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. See discussion 4.9-a).

4.9-e) - For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The City of Parlier does not have an airport and the General Plan does not include an airport land use plan. The closest airport to the Project site is the Reedley Municipal Airport, located approximately six miles northeast. Therefore, there would be no impact. 14 Department of Toxic Substances Control, EnviroStor - https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=parlier%2C+ca Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 33 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 9
Hazards and Hazardous Materials

4.9-f) - Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not impair nor physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan because the City of Parlier does not have an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan. The Fresno County Office of Emergency Services has an adopted plan titled Fresno County Hazard Mitigation Plan. 15 However, the City of Parlier is not a participating jurisdiction to the Hazard Mitigation Plan. Notwithstanding this fact, prior to commencement of construction activities, the City of Parlier requires all general contractors to submit a Traffic Control Plan demonstrating how traffic will be managed to ensure through access or a detour route. This Traffic Control Plan is required to be shared with the City's emergency response agencies (police, fire, medical, etc.) to ensure emergency response service agencies operating in the City for review of Project activities. Additionally, the roadways where the improvements would occur are wide enough to accommodate the construction activities as well as through traffic. Therefore, impacts are anticipated to be less than significant.

4.9-g) - Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The Project site is located in an urban area with Public Facilities to the west, medium density and high-density residential development to the south, a community housing complex to the east, and mostly open space to the north. There are no wildland areas within the city limits According to the California Office of the State Fire Marshal's Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map16 there are no high fire hazard zones near the City of Parlier. Therefore, the Project would not expose people to any significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires and there would be no impact.
15 Fresno County Office of Emergency Services, Fresno County Hazard Mitigation Plan - https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/public-health/office-of-emergency-services-oes 16 California Office of the State Fire Marshal, Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map - https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/ Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 34 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 10
Hydrology and Water Quality
Section 4.10 - Hydrology and Water Quality
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact
Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements or otherwise substantially •
degrade surface or ground water quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge • X • such that the project may impede sustainable
groundwater management of the basin?
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of
surface runoff in a manner which would result in •
flooding on- or off-site?
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff?
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater • •
management plan?
Impact Evaluation

4.10-a) - Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Less than Significant Impact. The California State Water Board, along with the nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards, (Water Boards) are tasked with protecting and enhancing the quality of California's water resources by implementing the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.; CWA, § 101 et seq.) and the State's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Wat. Code, § 13000 et seq.). The Water Board submits biennial reports to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that includes the CWA section 303(d) list of impaired waters and the condition of its surface water quality as required by section 305(b) of the CWA.

The 2018 California Integrated Report (Clean Water Act Section 303(d) list and 305(b) Report) Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 35 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 10
Hydrology and Water Quality
can be found on the Water Board's Water Quality Assessment website' . Additionally, the Water Board maintains an interactive Geographic Information System map18 , which correlates to the 2018 California Integrated Report's 303(d) list, where the public can see all the impacted water bodies in the state.

The nearest water body listed on the 303(d) list is the Kings River, located approximately four miles east of the Project site. However, the proposed Project is not connected to this impaired stream. Under the existing physical conditions, the stormwater runoff from the Project site would flow into the street where it would be conveyed into the existing drainage inlet located on the west corner of Tulare Street and would be conveyed into the basin located across the street. Upon completion of the Project, existing drainage patters would remain unaltered. Future stormwater runoff that enters the City's stormwater infrastructure will ultimately reach retention stormwater basins where stormwater would then percolate into the ground and recharge the water table.

Stormwater runoff in the City of Parlier does not reach any surface water body.

Prior to commencement of construction activities, the general contractor would be required to prepare and submit to the City of Parlier a SWPPP that has been approved by the Water Board and implement the plan while the Project is in construction. BMPs recommended in the SWPPP would be implemented during construction activities to minimize, or prevent altogether, potential impacts caused by potential erosion from the construction site. Common BMPs for this area include sediment controls, such as silt fencing or temporary fiber rolls to contain exposed soils, and drainage inlet protection.

It is not anticipated that, as result of the construction of this Project, any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would be violated or exceeded, nor would the Project otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality. Therefore, impacts will be less than significant.

4.10-b) - Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project site's land use is currently designated as high density residential and previously included a developed affordable housing complex that has been demolished. The Project would result in a community park with drought-tolerating landscaping and drip irrigation as well as a public restroom. The typical water demand for parks is approximately half of the typical water demand for multi-family residential areas 9. The City of Parlier water system distribution is adequate for supplying water to the community even previously when the project site was developed. The Project, when completed, would require a lower demand for water than the site previously required with the fully developed housing complex.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
17 California State Water Resources Control Board, Water Quality Assessment, 2018 Integrated Report - https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterissues/programs/water quality assessment/2018 integrated report.html 18 California State Water Resources Control Board, 2018 Integrated Report Map - https://gispublic.waterboards.ca.gov/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e2def63ccef54eedbee4ad726ab1552c 19 Water and Wastewater Engineering, Water Supply and Wastewater Removal, 3rd Edition Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 36 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 10
Hydrology and Water Quality

4.10-c(i) - Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
Less than Significant Impact. As previously stated, BMPs recommended in the SWPPP would be implemented during construction activities to minimize, or prevent altogether, the impacts caused by potential erosion from the construction site. Common BMPs for this area include sediment controls, such as silt fencing or temporary fiber rolls to contain exposed soils, and drainage inlet protection. The stormwater runoff from construction of the Project would flow into the street where it is then conveyed into the existing drainage inlet located on the west corner of Tulare Street and would be conveyed into the basin located across the street. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.10-c(ii) - Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? No Impact. The proposed Project would consist of drought-tolerating landscaping and materials.

The stormwater runoff would flow into the street where it would be conveyed into the existing drainage inlet located on the west corner of Tulare Street and would be conveyed into the basin located across the street. Because the City's storm water system was adequate when the Project site was previously developed with a multi-family housing complex, the Project should not have a significant impact on the existing storm water system. Therefore, the Project should not significantly impact the possibility of a flood on or off site.

4.10-c(iii) - Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? No Impact. See discussions 4.10-c(i) and 4.10-c(ii).

4.10-c(iv) - Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would impede or redirect flood flows? Less than Significant Impact. See discussions 4.10-c(i) and 4.10-c(ii).

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 37 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 10
Hydrology and Water Quality

4.10-d) - Would the project located in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Less than Significant Impact. According to the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services' My Hazards2° map, the Project site is not located in any tsunami, seiche zone, or FEMA 100-Year Floodplain; however, it is located near an area with a low hazard of flooding. In these areas, it is recommended that any wells be protected from potential contamination in the unlikely event of a flood. There are no wells included as a part of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.10-e) - Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Parlier is member agency to the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency, the agency responsible for the implementation of the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Plan.21 The construction of the Project would incorporate BMPs recommended in the SWPPP to minimize potential contamination of stormwater runoff, which would prevent degradation of groundwater quality. As stated in discussions 4.10-a) and 4.10-b), the Project would have a less than significant impact on ground water quality and groundwater supplies. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 20 California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, My Hazards - https://myhazards.caloes.ca.gov/ 21 South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Agency, Groundwater Sustainability Plan - http://www.southkingsgsa.org/ Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 38 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 11
Land Use and Planning
Section 4.11 - Land Use and Planning
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a
conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an L
environmental effect?
Impact Evaluation

4.11-a) - Would the project physically divide an established community? No Impact. The Project would not physically divide an established community. Access to the adjacent housing developments would not be affected by construction activities related to the proposed Project. A temporary construction entrance/exit would be established for the construction workers to utilize, avoiding complete closure of the access surrounding housing. No impact is anticipated.

4.11-b) - Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
Less than Significant Impact. The existing land use, where the proposed Project would be located, is currently designated for Medium Density Residential. The Project would amend the existing land use designation from Medium Density Residential to Park. The Project would not conflict with any applicable local or regional land use plans. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 39 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 12
Mineral Resources
Section 4.12 - Mineral Resources
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the X residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local X
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Impact Evaluation

4.12-a) - Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. In reviewing the County of Fresno General Plan's Open Space and Conservation Element, as well as the City of Parlier's General Plan, the Project would not be located in an area of locally important mineral resource recovery. A search of the California Department of Conservation's Geologic Energy Management Division's online mapping application "Well Finder" shows there are no active, inactive, or capped oil wells located within the Project site.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or the State. No impact is anticipated.

4.12-b) - Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
No Impact. As mentioned in discussion 4.12-a), the Project would occur within a developed area of the City of Parlier. There are no known locally important mineral resource recovery sites within the limits of the City. The Project would be constructed in area that has been previously disturbed and is an area that is not listed in the City's General Plan or any other land use plan as having a locally important mineral resource. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. 22 California Department of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Well Finder Mapping Application - https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/-119.58615/36.44587/10 Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 40 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 13
Noise
Section 4.13 - Noise
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Impact
Mitigation Impact
Would the Project result in: Incorporated
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local • • • general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? • • •
C) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a
plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a • X
public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
Impact Evaluation

4.13-a) - Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
Less than Significant Impact. The City of Parlier does not have any adopted noise level standards. However, Ordinance 6.13.030(D)23 provides an exception to noise generated by construction equipment of work performed on days other than Sundays between the hours of 7AM and 8PM. The Project is expected to result in construction activities within the days and hours permitted by the exception in the City's ordinance. The Project does not contain any components that, after construction is completed, would result in permanent increases in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.13-b) - Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less than Significant Impact. It is reasonable to expect groundborne vibrations and noises from the off-road equipment that would be operated in the construction area; however, these vibrations and noises would be temporary and localized. The scope of the proposed Project would require the use of excavators, loaders, and dump-trucks. The Project would not involve any pile driving operations, blasting, or large compacting operations that would generate significant groundborne vibrations or groundborne noise levels.

Groundborne vibrations can be differentiated into two categories, continuous or transient.

Continuous vibrations would encompass most of the off-road construction equipment utilized 23 City of Parlier, Code of Ordinances, Title 6 - Health and Safety, Chapter 6.13 - https://library.municode.com/ca/parlier/codes/code_of ordinances?nodeld=TITHESA CH6.13NO 6.13.030EX Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 41 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 13
Noise
within a construction area because these vibration sources are operated for several hours during working days. Transient sources of vibration generally only create an isolated vibration event in any given area. Vibrations are like noises, in that they involve a source (off-road equipment), a transmission path (the ground), and receiver (people and structures). Similar to noise, vibrations consist of both amplitude and frequency. A person's perception vibrations largely depends on their individual sensitivity to vibrations, as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source generating the vibration. Caltrans published a Vibration Guidance Manual24 (Manual) which provides some parameters by which impacts from groundborne vibrations and groundborne noise levels can be assessed. Groundborne vibrations are measured in terms of peak particle velocity (PPV) with a unit of inches per second.

Table 4.13.1 below, provides maximum vibration thresholds for structures:

Table 4.13.1 - Vibration Criteria for Structural Damage Maximum Vibration Level (in/sec PPV)
Transient Continuous/Frequent
Structure and Condition Sources Intermittent Sources
Extremely fragile historic buildings, ruins, ancient monuments 0.12 0.08 Fragile buildings 0.2 0.1
Historic and some old buildings 0.5 0.25
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5
Source: Caltrans - Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (2020) Table 4.13.2 below provides baseline thresholds of human perception of vibration levels:

Table 4.13.2 - Vibration Criteria for Human Annoyance
Maximum Vibration Level (in/sec PPV)
Transient Continuous/Frequent
Human Response Sources Intermittent Sources
Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Strongly perceptible 0.9 0.1
Severe 2.0 0.4
Source: Caltrans - Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (2020) Table 4.13.3 below provides representative vibration amplitudes of typical construction equipment:
24 Caltrans, Vibration Guidance Manual (2020) - https://dot.ca.gov/programs/environmental-analysis/noise-vibration/guidance- manuals
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 42 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 13
Noise
Table 4.13.3 - Representative Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec)
at 25 Feet
Vibratory Roller 0.210
Large Bulldozer 0.089
Caisson Drilling 0.089
Loaded Trucks 0.076
Jackhammer 0.035
Small Bulldozers 0.003
Crack-and-seat equipment 2.4
Source: Caltrans - Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (2020) As previously mentioned, the equipment that is expected to be utilized to complete the proposed Project includes excavators, loaders, trucks, and jumping jack compactors. The expected highest vibration level from the equipment expected to be utilized in this project is 0.089 in/sec ppv measured at 25 feet away from the source. Table 4.13.1 shows that the threshold at which there is risk to normal structures from continuous events is 0.3 in/sec ppv for older residential structures and 0.5 in/sec ppv for newer residential structures and modern industrial/commercial buildings.

Table 4.13.2 shows that vibration sources become strongly perceptible for individuals at 0.1 in/sec ppv, when measured at 25 feet away from the source. The residential and commercial structures located closest to the where proposed Project activities would occur are more than 25 feet away.

When individuals need to utilize the sidewalks while construction activities are ongoing, the time necessary for an individual to walk or ride past the source of groundborne vibrations can be reasonably expected to last just a few minutes. Although those individuals could potentially walk within a 25-foot distance from the vibration source, the anticipated highest vibration amplitude from the equipment expected to be on site is less than the threshold at which vibrations would be strongly perceived by an individual. In summary, the Project is not anticipated to exceed the vibration thresholds that could cause significant harm to structures or individuals. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.13-c) - For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact. The City of Parlier does not have an airport and the General Plan does not include an airport land use plan. The closest airport to the Project site is the Reedley Municipal Airport located approximately six miles northeast. Therefore, the Project would not expose people in the area to excessive noise levels generated from an airport or private airstrip.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 43 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 14
Population and Housing
Section 4.14 - Population and Housing
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Mitigation Significant Impact
Impact Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new •
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of people or housing,
necessitating construction of replacement • • • X
housing elsewhere?
Impact Evaluation

4.14-a) - Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth. There would be no component of the Project that includes the expansion of roads or public utility infrastructure and there would be no additional housing or commercial developments constructed as part of the Project. The proposed Project would result in a new community park in a previously developed land that is substantially surrounded by urban uses.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.14-b) - Would the project displace substantial numbers of people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The Project site is currently a vacant parcel; thus, no existing housing would be destroyed, no people would be displaced, and the construction of replacement housing would not be required. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 44 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 15
Public Services
Section 4.15 - Public Services
Less Than
Potentially Significant
No
significan Impact
mpac Herpetud
Would the Project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
1) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
ill) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities? X
Impact Evaluation

4.15-a(i) - Would the project Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services - fire protection? Less than Significant Impact. The nearest fire station to the Project site is located approximately

0.3 miles west. Fire services in the City of Parlier are provided by the Fresno County Fire Protection District. The Project site is located within the existing service area of the Fresno County fire station nearby. As a result, an expansion of facilities and/or staff would not be necessary as a result of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.15-a(ii) - Would the project Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services - police protection? Less than Significant Impact. The nearest police station to the Project site is located approximately 0.75 miles west. Police services are provided by the City of Parlier Police Department. The Project site is located within the existing service area of the City of Parlier Police Department station nearby. As a result, an expansion of facilities and/or staff would not be necessary as a result of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 45 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 15
Public Services

4.15-a(ili) - Would the project Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services - schools? No Impact. There is one school, Parlier Junior High School, located approximately 0.2 miles west of the Project site. The Project would not result in a substantial increase in the population for the area, which would have an impact on schools in the area. As a result, no expansion of school facilities or staff is needed. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.15-a(iv) - Would the project Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services - parks? Less than Significant Impact. There are two existing parks located approximately 0.5 miles away from the Project site, City Heritage Park and Earl Ruth Park. The Project would result in the construction of a new community park and would not include the construction of any new housing.

The Project itself would be an expansion of park facilities within the City. The creation of a new park would require a potential increase in staff to maintain the new park facilities. The introduction of a new community park and the potential hiring of staff to maintain it would not result in any significant environmental impacts. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.15-a(v) - Would the project Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services - other public facilities?
No Impact. No other public facilities are required to be built or altered to serve this Project.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 46 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 16
Recreation
Section 4.16 - Recreation
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact
Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that • substantial physical deterioration of the facility would X occur or be accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities
• •
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Impact Evaluation

4.16-a) - Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
No Impact. The City of Parlier's General Plan establishes the standard to provide two acres/1,000 residents for neighborhood parks and one acre/1000 residents for community parks. (City of Parlier, 2010) By utilizing the California Department of Parks and Recreation's Community FactFinder25 tool, it is evident that the area surrounding the project site currently offers a ratio of

2.5 acres/1000 residents. As previously stated in Public Services, the Project does not include the construction of any new dwelling units. The Project would result in the construction of a new community park that would add a new recreational facility for the residents of Parlier. A new community park would decrease use and stress put on other recreational facilities already existing in the area. Therefore, there would be no impact.

4.16-b) - Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
Less than Significant Impact. See discussion 4.15-a(iv) of Factor 15 (Public Services). The proposed Project would construct a new recreational facility, which would be designed with environmental sustainability features (i.e. recycled materials, solar lights, environmentally friendly hardscape, etc.) and which would reduce the likelihood of the Project having a significant adverse impact on the environment. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 25 California Department of Parks and Recreation, Community FactFinder - https://www.parksforcalifornia.org/communities/? address=parlier%2%20ca&lat=36.61087725&Ing=- 119.53397512&overlays=parks
Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 47 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 17
Transportation / Traffic
Section 4.17 - Transportation / Traffic
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit, • X roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines • • X
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous • •
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? •
Impact Evaluation

4.17-a) - Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Less than Significant Impact. The City of Parlier General Plan includes a Circulation Element which establishes objectives, policies, and standards for the purpose of establishing a transportation network which allows for the efficient and safe movement of people, goods, and vehicles. (City of Parlier, 2010) The objectives outlined in the Circulation Element are meant to guide future development as the City grows to ensure the transportation network performs efficiently. The City of Parlier does not, at the time of this document's preparation, have an adopted Transit Master Plan or Bicycle and Trails Master Plan. The Project would result in the construction of a community park that would leverage the existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities to encourage walking and bicycling to reduce the amount of automobile trips generated by the Project. The Project would not conflict with any program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system. Upon completion of the Project, the affected portions of the City's transportation system would be restored to pre-project conditions. The proposed Project would result in an increased load onto the City's roads and pedestrian facilities however impacts would not be significant.

During construction, there could be instances where the flow of vehicles and pedestrians would be temporarily impacted resulting in a decreased performance of the City's transportation system.

Before commencing any construction activities, the general contractor will be required to submit to the City a Traffic Control Plan to demonstrate how vehicle and pedestrian traffic would be allowed to travel through the construction area or how traffic would be rerouted around the construction work. The Traffic Control Plan would be shared with the City's emergency service providers as well. For these reasons, it is anticipated that the Project would result in a less than significant impact on the City's circulation system.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 48 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 17
Transportation / Traffic

4.17-b) - Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
Less than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would result in the construction of a new community park, which would attract residents who live within the vicinity of the Project site. The new community park would follow the City of Parlier's official park hours, which are from 7AM to 10PM. On-site parking would be limited to ADA-parking stalls only. On-street parking would be available to residents utilizing the park. The construction and operation of a City park would not result in a substantial generation of vehicle miles traveled for the Project site. The Project would not be in conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 (b). Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.17-c) - Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not increase hazards due to a design feature because there would not be any modification to the existing roadway geometry. Upon installation of the underground improvements, the roadway surfaces would be restored to the pre-Project conditions. Roadways would remain open for traffic during the construction phase, and any open trenches would be covered at the end of each workday to ensure full access to residents and emergency vehicles during nonworking hours. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.17-d) - Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not significantly impede access for emergency vehicles to the surrounding residential and commercial areas. The Traffic Control Plan mentioned in impact 4.17-a) would be shared with emergency service providers, and they would have the opportunity to provide comments to ensure that emergency access needs are satisfied during construction., Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 49 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 18
Tribal Cultural Resources
Section 4.18 - Tribal Cultural Resources
Would the Project Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Less Than Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No
feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically Impact defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, Impact Mitigation Impact sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Incorporated Native American tribe, and that is:

Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of
historical resources as defined in Public Resources
Code section 5020.1(k), or
A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to
be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision • (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the
lead agency shall consider the significance of the
resource to a California Native American tribe.

Impact Evaluation

4.18-a) - Would the Project Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)?
Less than Significant Impact. Please see the discussions of Cultural Resources. The Project site was previously developed approximately 60 years ago and was recently demolished. It is unlikely that tribal cultural resources would be found within the Project site because the area has been previously disturbed with the construction of a multi-family housing complex. A Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request was submitted to the NAHC. The request included a request to perform a Sacred Lands File Search. The Native American tribes listed in the response letter from the NAHC were contacted about the proposed Project and were provided with a 30- and 90-day notice to provide comments or request to enter into formal consultation, pursuant to AB 52 and SB 18, respectively. As of the time of preparation of this document, only two of Native American tribes have responded to the notices mailed to all the tribe representatives (See Appendix A) The representatives from Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians and Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe were the only individuals who replied to the City's notice, indicating they had no comments or concerns pertaining to the proposed Project. Nevertheless, during the construction phase of the Project, if any cultural resources are discovered, all Project operations will come to a halt and the appropriate Native American tribes would be contacted.

Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 50 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 18
Tribal Cultural Resources

4.18-b) - Would the Project Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.? Less than Significant Impact. See discussion 4.18-a).

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 51 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 19
Utilities and Service Systems
Section 4.19 - Utilities and Service Systems
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with No
Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Would the Project: Incorporated
Require or result in the relocation or construction of
new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or • X telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future • X
development during normal, dry and multiple dry •
years?
Result in a determination by the waste water
treatment provider, which serves or may serve the • •
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
Generate solid waste in excess of state or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local • • X
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid X waste?
Impact Evaluation

4.19-a) - Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
No Impact. The Project site is a vacant parcel that was previously developed as a multi-family housing complex which has since been demolished. The Project would use the existing utility facilities; thus not requiring the construction or relocation of new water, wastewater, storm water, electrical, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 52 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 19
Utilities and Service Systems

4.19-b) - Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
Less than Significant Impact. Parlier's domestic water comes entirely from groundwater produced by seven production wells,26 which produced a combined annual average of 690,400,000 gallons between 2010 and 2017,27 or just under 1.9 million gallons per day.28 The present water distribution system is adequate for supplying water to the existing community at sufficient fire flows. The Project would rely on the City as its water provider and would utilize water conservation landscaping. The Project would not use an amount of water that would have a substantial impact on the City's existing water supply. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.19-c) - Would the project result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, -
which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is served by the Parlier Wastewater Treatment Plant located in southwest Parlier. According to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region the Parlier Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has a permitted capacity of 2.0 mgd (million gallons per day). From 2010-2017, the average daily inflow at the WWTP was approximately 1.06 mgd.29 The Project would not result in a substantial amount of new wastewater being produced to put significant stress on the City's WWTP. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.19-d) - Would the project generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
Less than Significant Impact. The City of Parlier is served by the Mid Valley Disposal solid waste collection system. The proposed Project would result in the construction of a community park and would not result in an increase of the City's population. The Project would not result in a substantial increase in the City's population; however, the Project would generate solid waste during the construction phase. While solid waste collected within Fresno County is taken to the American Ave Landfill, solid waste generated during the construction phase of this project cannot be disposed of at any county landfill30 . The County has a list of Disposal Sites for construction and demolition debris. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 26 Four wells are currently active. A fifth is used as a standby well. A sixth, which suffers from water quality issues, can be used on a short-term, emergency basis. The seventh well is inactive, but is being rehabilitated for use as a standby well. 2 Background information for development of the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Provost & Pritchard Consulting 28 In 2014 and 2015, water conservation policies were put in place; thus, usage starting in 2014 is considerably lower than previous yeaackground information for development of the South Kings Groundwater Sustainability Plan. Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, 2020.
30 County of Fresno, Public Works and Planning, Resources and Parks Division, Recycling and Solid Waste Disposal - https://www.co.fresno.ca.us/departments/public-works-planning/divisions-of-public-works-and-planning/resources-and-parks- division/recycling-and-solid-waste-disposal/construction- Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 53 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 19
Utilities and Service Systems

4.19-e) - Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less than Significant Impact. In accordance with California's Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), the Local Government Construction and Demolition Guide of 2002 (SB 1374), and Fresno County Ordinance Code 8.25, the County has established the goal to divert a minimum of 65% of all waste generated from a permitted project must be repurposed or recycled.

The County of Fresno has implemented recycling and waste diversion programs to help reach the 65% reduction goal. The City of Parlier's City Ordinance 6.20.06031 also requires covered construction projects to divert construction and demolition debris. The City Ordinance requires applicants for a covered project to submit a waste management plan form to the City Planning Department prior to beginning any construction, demolition, or renovation activities that generate solid waste. Therefore, by adhering to the established procedures and requirements listed herein, the Project would have a less than significant impact.
31 City of Parlier, Code of Ordinances, Title 6 - Health and Safety - Chapter 6.20 - https://library.municode.com/ca/parlier/codes/code of ordinances?nodeld=TIT6HESA CH6.20GARUCOWAREDI 6.20.060CODEC Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 54 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 21
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Section 4.20 - Wildfire
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands Significant with No Mitigation Significant Impact
classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Impact Impact Project: Incorporated
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response X plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project • • occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire X or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may d)
including
instability, or drainage changes?
Impact Evaluation

4.20-a) - Would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?

4.20-b) - Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

4.20-c) - Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?

4.20-d) - Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No Impact. The Project site is not located in an area that is designated as being in a very high hazard severity zone as shown by the California Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer.32 The Project site is also not located in an area designated as being a State Responsibility Area. 33 The Project area is served by local firefighters from the Fresno County Fire Protection District Parlier Station 71, located approximately 0.3 miles northwest of the Project site. The Project site is relatively flat and located in an urbanized setting. Therefore, there would be no impact. 32 Is your home in a fire hazard severity zone? Website: Is Your Home in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone? (arcgis.com). Accessed 3/29/21.
33 California State Responsibility Areas. Website: ArcGIS - California State Responsibility Areas. Accessed 3/29/21.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 55 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 21
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Section 4.21 - Mandatory Findings of Significance
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant with Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporated
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal X •
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have impacts that are individually
cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable"
incremental effects of a project are significant when • • viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects that
would cause substantial adverse effects on human • X
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Impact Evaluation

4.21-a) - Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is within the City limits of City of Parlier where there are no known endangered or threatened species and where the possibility of uncovering tribal and/or cultural artifacts is low, the scope of this Project would involve land disturbance of areas which have been previously disturbed during the construction of the existing roadways and the former multi-family housing development. As has been evaluated and discussed throughout this IS/ND document, the proposed Project would not, in a significant manner, degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 56 ends

Section 4
Environmental Factor 21
Mandatory Findings of Significance

4.21-b) - Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Less than Significant Impact. As demonstrated and discussed in Section 1 through 20 of this IS/ND, the Project would have no impact or less than significant impacts with respect to all the environmental factors considered in this document. The Project does not present a cumulatively considerable impact because it is not being built as part of a larger future development. While the City of Parlier continues to undergo public facility improvements (ex. roads, sanitary sewer, water system, etc.) during the time that this Project is expected to be under construction and after construction has been completed, each project will be required to evaluate its individual environmental impacts and mitigate any potentially significant effects. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

4.21-c) - Does the project have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less than Significant Impact. Impacts to human beings, either directly or indirectly, from the environmental factors discussed and evaluated as part of this IS/ND document are generally associated with air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, and noise impacts. However, all environmental factors have been evaluated, and, based on the scope of the Project, none of the environmental factors are reasonably expected to result in a significant impact to the environment or to human beings, either directly or indirectly, that necessitate the implementation of mitigative measures. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Fig Tree Park Project City of Parlier

Page 57 ends

Appendix A
RESOLUTION 2022-46

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARLIER ADOPTING

A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR AND DETERMINING TO CARRY OUT THE

CITY OF PARLIER FIG TREE PARK PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Parlier (City) intends to construct a new community park on a portion of the undeveloped area of Fresno County Assessor Parcel Number 355-028-07 in central Parlier known as Fig Tree Park (Project); and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned construction activities, individually and collectively, constitute a "project" pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000, et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1, on or about October 1, 2021 the City provided notice of the Project to the Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians, the Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians, the Cold Springs Rancheria, the Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal Government, the Dunlap Band of Mono Indians, the Kings River Choinumni Farm Tribe, the Nashville Enterprise Miwok-Maidu-Nishinam Tribe, the North Fork Mono Tribe, the Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians, Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe, the Table Mountain Rancheria, the Traditional Choinumni Tribe, the Tule River Indian Tribe, the Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band, and received no response buy therefrom; WHEREAS, the City has prepared an initial study pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and made a preliminary determination that approval of the Project, would not result in any significant impacts to the environment, and accordingly adoption of a negative declaration would be appropriate; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022 the City filed a notice of intent to adopt a mitigated negative declaration with the Fresno County Clerk and published said notice in The Business Journal, said notice indicating that the initial study and proposed negative declaration (IS/ND) would be available for public review starting on June 15, 2022 and ending on July 14, 2022; and WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022 the City filed the IS/ND with the State Clearinghouse of the Governor's Office of Planning and Research for distribution; and WHEREAS, no comments were received; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it cannot be fairly argued, nor is there any substantial evidence in the record, that the project could have a significant effect on the environment, either directly or indirectly; and
WHEREAS, based upon the initial study and negative declaration and the record, the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse impact on environmental resources; WHEREAS, the City of Parlier is the custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of the proceedings on which these determinations are based, and Parlier City Hall, 1100 E. Parlier Avenue, Parlier, CA is the location of this record; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Parlier City Council takes the following actions:

1. Finds and affirms that City of Parlier Fig Tree Park Project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and
Adopts the mitigated negative declaration and mitigation monitoring and reporting program as proposed, with mitigation measures incorporated as conditions of project approval as appropriate, andytz]

3. Directs staff to undertake the necessary actions to carry out the project, and

4. Directs the City Manager or designee to file a notice of determination with the Fresno County Clerk within five (5) business days.
*******************
The foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Parlier held on August 18, 2022 by the following vote to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Dorothy Garza, City Clerk Hon. Alma Beltran, Mayor
2 ORDINANCE NO. 2022-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARLIER AMENDING THE

OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY TO REFLECT A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 355-028-07
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on August 18, 2022, the City Council of the City of Parlier did conduct a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Fig Tree Project (Project) on a portion of Fresno County Assessor's Parcel No. 355-028-07 (Site); and WHEREAS, the Site is currently zoned R-2 (Low Density / Multiple Family Residential); and
WHEREAS, via adoption of Resolution No. 2022-XX, the City Council did amend the Land Use Diagram of the City of Parlier General Plan to reflect the Site as Park; and WHEREAS, the Project includes a change of zone for the Site to O (Open Space) as illustrated in Exhibit "A" hereto; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PARLIER DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section l. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Parlier is hereby amended to indicate the affected portion of Assessor's Parcel No. 355-028-07 as O (Open Space) as illustrated in Exhibit "A" hereto.

Section II. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect from and after thirty (30) days following its final passage and adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the ordinance, or a summary of the ordinance, shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Parlier on the 18t day of August 2022 and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 1st day of September 2022 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Honorable Alma Beltran, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dorothy Garza, City Clerk Neal E. Costanzo, City Attorney Exhibit A
-NOTE-
This map is for Assessment purposes only. SUBDIVIDED LAND IN POR. SEC. 24, T.15S., R.22E., M.D.B.&M. Tax Rate Area 355-28 It is not to be construed as portraying legal 7-011
ownership ordiner su frison tavrpasos
349.23 1'=100
E. PARLIER 3
ST.

AVE.
120 18 37.14
AVE.
108
PARCEL "
$ FRESNO ST.
170. PARCEL 2
PARCEL 72.15

1.06Ac. 200

2.89Ac. 4.70Ac 577.02
200321 E PARCEL A

1.64Ac.
173.51* PARCEL S 85
PARCEL
487.31
& E. TULARE IP2442-60
AVE.

PETTIT AVE. HERRING AVE. BIGGER AVE.

Parcel Map No. 84-03 - Bk. 42, Pg. 60
Assasury of Fresno, CarPg. 28
1122/2018 Note - Assessors Parcel Numbers Shown in Circles Fig Tree Park Rezone (portion of APN 355-280-07) Project R-2 to O
AGENDA ITEM: #5
MEETING DATE: August 18, 2022
DEPARTMENT: Community Development -
Planning

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:

City Council to Consider amendment to the Cannabis Control Ordinance regarding the number of dispensaries permissible within the city limits.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council introduces and waives the first reading of Ordinance No. 22-XX, amending Parlier Municipal Code Section 18.55.050(B) to increase the number of dispensaries that may be allowed within the city limits from one (1) to two (2).

BACKGROUND:

The City Council established the City's Cannabis Control Ordinance (Parlier Municipal Code [PMC] Chapter 18.55) on November 15, 2017 via Ordinance No. 2017-03. The Ordinance was and is intended to regulate commercial cannabis activities, and to a lesser extent, recreational and medical use of cannabis, consistent with the provisions of the State's Medicinal and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA). To accommodate changes in the State's regulatory scheme as well as changes in local preference and policy, the Ordinance has been amended from time to time.

On November 19, 2020 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2020-5, which made certain amendments to the Cannabis Control Ordinance intended to authorize the Council to approve operation of a maximum of one (1) cannabis dispensary with the Parlier city limits. Under the revised provisions, such a dispensary could be allowed subject to approval of a cannabis regulatory permit at the Council's discretion. A follow-up ordinance revision added dispensaries to the list of uses in the C-4 Central Trading) zone. One such retail facility has been approved and is at this time operational.

The most recent amendments to the Cannabis Control Ordinance occurred in May and June 2021 (Ordinance Nos. 2021-02 and 2021-03). Those amendments were intended to clarify the language added via Ordinance No. 2020-5 and address provisions for outdoor commercial cultivation. The City Council has since expressed a desire to facilitate additional storefront retail cannabis activities. Accordingly, the Council has directed staff to prepare an ordinance amendment allowing a maximum of two (2) storefront retail facilities (dispensaries), each subject to separate Council approval of a regulatory permit.

Council's further direction was to amend the text of the M-1 (Manufacturing) zone district to allow dispensaries as a permitted use subject to a regulatory permit as was done previously for the C-4 zone.

PROPOSAL & DISCUSSION:

On review, staff has determined that the requested amendment to the M-1 zone is unnecessary. Currently, the M-1 zone includes as a permitted use: "Commercial cannabis activities subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.55." Under the umbrella of "commercial cannabis activities," dispensaries (along with all other permissible cannabis activities) are already allowed in the M-1 zone so long as the Council approves a regulatory permit. Accordingly, the proposed ordinance would change only one provision of the Cannabis Control Ordinance: the maximum number of dispensaries that may be authorized city-wide would be increased from one (1) to two (2).

Environmental
The first step in complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is to determine whether the activity in question constitutes a "project" as defined by CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq. The second step is to determine whether the project is subject to or exempt from the statute. This proposal qualifies as a project under CEQA because it involves the issuance to a person of a "lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use" as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

However, the proposed ordinance amendment does not approve or otherwise authorize any specific activity that could result in a physical change to the environment; it is solely an amendment to regulations. In cases where it can be shown with certainty that the project being considered has no possibility of causing a significant impact to the environment, the project is not subject to CEQA as indicated in Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

FISCAL IMPACT:

Estimated staff time amounting to less than $1,000 for preparation of reports, resolution, and ordinance and for meeting attendance, plus approximately $500 for public noticing.

Future approval of additional commercial cannabis activities has the potential to increase the City's General Fund revenue by an unspecified amount.

Prepared by: Approved by:

Jeffrey O'Neal, AICP
City Planner
Attachments:
• Ordinance No. 22-XX (to follow)
TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION Consent Public Hearing
Info Item Matter Initiated by a Council Member
Action Item Other
_ Department Report Continued to:

Redevelopment Agency

Parlier City CouncilAugust 18, 2022

Parlier City Council
August 18, 2022