AR 14 ATTACHMENT E2 - IS_MND - Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Energy & Geotech Technical Studies — Pasadena City Council, September 18, 2023 (part 1 of 3)

____________________________________________________________________________ 740-790 East Green Street Mixed-Use Project 12101
Responses to Comment on the IS/MND & MMRP June 2023
Attachment A-2
Revised IS/MND Appendices
ATTACHMENT E2

Appendix A
CalEEMod Outputs

Project Characteristics - 2018 PCL
Land Use -
Construction Phase - operations only.

Off-road Equipment - Operations only.

Grading - Operations only.

Trips and VMT - Operations only.

Vehicle Trips - TIA
Energy Use - Existing emissions
Operational Off-Road Equipment -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 69.44 1000sqft 1.59 69,442.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pasadena Water & Power
2020Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
486.58 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
E Green St Existing Unmit
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 1 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2020 4/7/2020
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 4.63 3.77
tblEnergyUse T24E 5.99 4.60
tblEnergyUse T24NG 12.05 10.02
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1664.14 486.58 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 2.17
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.93
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 9.74
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 2 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 3 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.2832 1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Energy 3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 237.6671 237.6671 0.0126 3.1600e-
003
238.9246
Mobile 0.1820 0.9329 2.4841 8.0300e-
003

0.6283 8.3100e-
003

0.6366 0.1684 7.8000e-
003

0.1762 0.0000 740.4788 740.4788 0.0415 0.0000 741.5164
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 13.1092 0.0000 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.9155 54.0170 57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952 Total 0.4691 0.9683 2.5147 8.2400e-
003

0.6283 0.0110 0.6393 0.1684 0.0105 0.1789 17.0247 1,032.164 6 1,049.189
2 1.2342 0.0133 1,084.015
4 Unmitigated Operational
Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Highest
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 4 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Energy 3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 237.6671 237.6671 0.0126 3.1600e-
003
238.9246
Mobile 0.1820 0.9329 2.4841 8.0300e-
003

0.6283 8.3100e-
003

0.6366 0.1684 7.8000e-
003

0.6283 0.0110 0.6393 0.1684 0.0105 0.1789 17.0247 1,032.164 6 1,049.189
2 1.2342 0.0133 1,084.015
4 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/7/2020 4/7/2020 5 1 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 5 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 0 7.00 247 0.40
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 6 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 7 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.6300e-
003

0.0000 2.6300e-
003

1.4500e-
003

0.0000 1.4500e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 8 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.1820 0.9329 2.4841 8.0300e-
003

0.6283 8.3100e-
003

0.6366 0.1684 7.8000e-
003

0.1762 0.0000 740.4788 740.4788 0.0415 0.0000 741.5164
Unmitigated 0.1820 0.9329 2.4841 8.0300e-
003

0.6283 8.3100e-
003

0.6366 0.1684 7.8000e-
003

0.1762 0.0000 740.4788 740.4788 0.0415 0.0000 741.5164

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
General Office Building 676.37 150.69 64.58 1,655,415 1,655,415 Total 676.37 150.69 64.58 1,655,415 1,655,415
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.547726 0.045437 0.201480 0.122768 0.016614 0.006090 0.019326 0.029174 0.002438 0.002359 0.005005 0.000677 0.000907 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 9 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 199.0909 199.0909 0.0119 2.4500e- 003
200.1191
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 199.0909 199.0909 0.0119 2.4500e- 003
200.1191
NaturalGas
Mitigated

3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 38.5762 38.5762 7.4000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

38.8055
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 38.5762 38.5762 7.4000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

38.8055

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: Y
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 10 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
722891 3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 38.5762 38.5762 7.4000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

38.8055
Total 3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 38.5762 38.5762 7.4000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

38.8055
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
722891 3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 38.5762 38.5762 7.4000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

38.8055
Total 3.9000e-
003

0.0354 0.0298 2.1000e-
004

2.6900e-
003

0.0000 38.5762 38.5762 7.4000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

38.8055
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 11 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
902052 199.0909 0.0119 2.4500e-
003
200.1191
Total 199.0909 0.0119 2.4500e-
003
200.1191
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
General Office
Building
902052 199.0909 0.0119 2.4500e-
003
200.1191
Total 199.0909 0.0119 2.4500e-
003
200.1191
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 12 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2832 1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Unmitigated 0.2832 1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.2509 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Total 0.2832 1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 13 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0322 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.2509 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Total 0.2832 1.0000e-
005

8.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e-
003

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 1.8400e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 14 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952
Unmitigated 57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office
Building

12.3418 /

7.56435

57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952
Total 57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 15 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
General Office
Building

12.3418 /

7.56435

57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952
Total 57.9325 0.4054 0.0102 71.0952
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774
Unmitigated 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 16 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office
Building

64.58 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774
Total 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
General Office
Building

64.58 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774
Total 13.1092 0.7747 0.0000 32.4774
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 17 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:32 PMPage 18 of 18 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - 2018 PCL
Land Use -
Construction Phase - operations only.

Off-road Equipment - Operations only.

Grading - Operations only.

Trips and VMT - Operations only.

Vehicle Trips - TIA
Energy Use - Existing emissions
Operational Off-Road Equipment -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 69.44 1000sqft 1.59 69,442.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pasadena Water & Power
2020Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
486.58 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
E Green St Existing Unmit
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 1 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2020 4/7/2020
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 4.63 3.77
tblEnergyUse T24E 5.99 4.60
tblEnergyUse T24NG 12.05 10.02
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1664.14 486.58 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 2.17
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.93
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 9.74
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 2 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 3 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Energy 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Mobile 1.3849 6.4461 18.6063 0.0602 4.6334 0.0601 4.6934 1.2401 0.0563 1.2964 6,119.164 5 6,119.1645 0.3335 6,127.500 7 Total 2.9583 6.6404 18.7765 0.0614 4.6334 0.0749 4.7082 1.2401 0.0711 1.3112 6,352.182 5 6,352.182
5 0.3380 4.2700e-
003
6,361.904
3 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Energy 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Mobile 1.3849 6.4461 18.6063 0.0602 4.6334 0.0601 4.6934 1.2401 0.0563 1.2964 6,119.164 5 6,119.1645 0.3335 6,127.500 7 Total 2.9583 6.6404 18.7765 0.0614 4.6334 0.0749 4.7082 1.2401 0.0711 1.3112 6,352.182 5 6,352.182
5 0.3380 4.2700e-
003
6,361.904
3 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 4 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/7/2020 4/7/2020 5 1 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 0 7.00 247 0.40
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 5 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 6 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

3.2 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 7 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3849 6.4461 18.6063 0.0602 4.6334 0.0601 4.6934 1.2401 0.0563 1.2964 6,119.164 5 6,119.1645 0.3335 6,127.500 7 Unmitigated 1.3849 6.4461 18.6063 0.0602 4.6334 0.0601 4.6934 1.2401 0.0563 1.2964 6,119.1645 6,119.1645 0.3335 6,127.500 7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.547726 0.045437 0.201480 0.122768 0.016614 0.006090 0.019326 0.029174 0.002438 0.002359 0.005005 0.000677 0.000907 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 8 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: Y
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 9 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Office
Building
1980.52 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Total 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Office
Building

1.98052 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Total 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 10 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Unmitigated 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.1764 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.7000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Total 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 11 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.1764 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.7000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Total 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 12 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:30 PMPage 13 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - 2018 PCL
Land Use -
Construction Phase - operations only.

Off-road Equipment - Operations only.

Grading - Operations only.

Trips and VMT - Operations only.

Vehicle Trips - TIA
Energy Use - Existing emissions
Operational Off-Road Equipment -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 69.44 1000sqft 1.59 69,442.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pasadena Water & Power
2020Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
486.58 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
E Green St Existing Unmit
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 1 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

2.0 Emissions Summary
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2020 4/7/2020
tblEnergyUse LightingElect 4.63 3.77
tblEnergyUse T24E 5.99 4.60
tblEnergyUse T24NG 12.05 10.02
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1664.14 486.58 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 2.17
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.93
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 9.74
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 2 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Maximum 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 3 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Energy 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Mobile 1.3477 6.6214 17.7205 0.0573 4.6334 0.0604 4.6937 1.2401 0.0566 1.2967 5,820.696 8 5,820.696
8 0.3320 5,828.996
7 Total 2.9211 6.8156 17.8908 0.0584 4.6334 0.0752 4.7085 1.2401 0.0714 1.3115 6,053.714 8 6,053.714
8 0.3365 4.2700e-
003
6,063.400
4 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Energy 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Mobile 1.3477 6.6214 17.7205 0.0573 4.6334 0.0604 4.6937 1.2401 0.0566 1.2967 5,820.696 8 5,820.696
8 0.3320 5,828.996
7 Total 2.9211 6.8156 17.8908 0.0584 4.6334 0.0752 4.7085 1.2401 0.0714 1.3115 6,053.714 8 6,053.714
8 0.3365 4.2700e-
003
6,063.400
4 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 4 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/7/2020 4/7/2020 5 1 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 0 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 0 7.00 247 0.40
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 3 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 5 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 6 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

3.2 Site Preparation - 2020
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.2693 0.0000 5.2693 2.8965 0.0000 2.8965 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 7 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.3477 6.6214 17.7205 0.0573 4.6334 0.0604 4.6937 1.2401 0.0566 1.2967 5,820.696 8 5,820.696
8 0.3320 5,828.996
7 Unmitigated 1.3477 6.6214 17.7205 0.0573 4.6334 0.0604 4.6937 1.2401 0.0566 1.2967 5,820.696 8 5,820.696
8 0.3320 5,828.996
7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.547726 0.045437 0.201480 0.122768 0.016614 0.006090 0.019326 0.029174 0.002438 0.002359 0.005005 0.000677 0.000907 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 8 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: Y
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 9 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
General Office
Building
1980.52 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Total 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

1.98052 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Total 0.0214 0.1942 0.1631 1.1700e-
003

0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 233.0028 233.0028 4.4700e-
003

4.2700e-
003
234.3874
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 10 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Unmitigated 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.1764 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.7000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Total 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 11 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.1764 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

1.3750 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.7000e-
004

7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Total 1.5520 7.0000e-
005

7.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.0152 0.0152 4.0000e-
005

0.0162
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 12 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 3/10/2020 2:23 PMPage 13 of 13 E Green St Existing Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 446.00 Space 4.01 178,400.00 0 City Park 0.90 Acre 0.90 39,204.00 0
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 3.50 1000sqft 0.08 3,496.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 263.00 Dwelling Unit 6.92 263,000.00 752 Regional Shopping Center 10.95 1000sqft 0.25 10,954.00 0 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 2.03 1000sqft 0.05 2,031.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pasadena Water & Power
2026Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
486.58 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
E Green St Proposed Unmit
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 1 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - 2018 PCL
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Data provided by applicant.

Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT - Rounded to even numbers due to one way trip count.

Demolition -
Grading - Data provided by applicant.

Vehicle Trips - TIA and adjusted weekend trip rates.

Woodstoves - no hearths
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - All outdoor water use assumed under city park land use. Assumed 100% aerobic.

Solid Waste - City park land use represents open space.

Land Use Change -
Sequestration -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Dust control measures.

Energy Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards
Water Mitigation - 2019 Calgreen standards
Waste Mitigation - AB341
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 26 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 261.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 327.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 65.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 88.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 2 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/25/2024 12/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/30/2024 12/31/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/26/2023 6/30/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/7/2023 9/29/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/27/2024 12/31/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/28/2024 1/1/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/8/2023 10/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2023 6/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/27/2023 7/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/31/2024 9/1/2025
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 223.55 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 26.30 263.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 13.15 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 162.50 2.33
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 40,741.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Trenchers
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1664.14 486.58 tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 545.00 546.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 5,093.00 5,094.00
tblTripsAndVMT PhaseName Trenching
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 3.00 4.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 3 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 287.00 288.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 57.00 58.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 2.49
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 22.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 139.72
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 46.81
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 696.00 733.47
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 2.28
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 16.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 116.32
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 23.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 500.00 526.92
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 2.59
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 112.18
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 40.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 716.00 754.55
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 13.15 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 13.15 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 4 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.4347 0.0966 0.5313 0.1646 0.0895 0.2541 0.0000 659.7147 659.7147 0.1109 0.0000 662.4863 2024 0.3933 2.8827 3.7908 9.8400e-
003

0.4736 0.1130 0.5867 0.1271 0.1057 0.2327 0.0000 887.3421 887.3421 0.1037 0.0000 889.9357 2025 1.0149 0.5460 1.1066 2.1700e-
003

0.0907 0.0258 0.1165 0.0241 0.0243 0.0484 0.0000 192.2420 192.2420 0.0319 0.0000 193.0406 Maximum 1.0149 2.8827 3.7908 9.8400e-
003

0.4736 0.1130 0.5867 0.1646 0.1057 0.2541 0.0000 887.3421 887.3421 0.1109 0.0000 889.9357 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.2658 2.6927 2.3717 7.1900e-
003

0.2394 0.0966 0.3360 0.0840 0.0895 0.1735 0.0000 659.7143 659.7143 0.1109 0.0000 662.4860 2024 0.3933 2.8827 3.7908 9.8400e-
003

0.3692 0.1130 0.4822 0.1014 0.1057 0.2071 0.0000 887.3417 887.3417 0.1037 0.0000 889.9353 2025 1.0149 0.5460 1.1066 2.1700e-
003

0.0702 0.0258 0.0960 0.0191 0.0243 0.0434 0.0000 192.2419 192.2419 0.0319 0.0000 193.0404 Maximum 1.0149 2.8827 3.7908 9.8400e-
003

0.3692 0.1130 0.4822 0.1014 0.1057 0.2071 0.0000 887.3417 887.3417 0.1109 0.0000 889.9353 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 5 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.05 0.00 25.94 35.25 0.00 20.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-1-2023 7-31-2023 0.9082 0.9082
2 8-1-2023 10-31-2023 1.4685 1.4685
3 11-1-2023 1-31-2024 0.8505 0.8505
4 2-1-2024 4-30-2024 0.8029 0.8029
5 5-1-2024 7-31-2024 0.8167 0.8167
6 8-1-2024 10-31-2024 0.8188 0.8188
7 11-1-2024 1-31-2025 0.6424 0.6424
8 2-1-2025 4-30-2025 0.2776 0.2776
9 5-1-2025 7-31-2025 0.2862 0.2862
10 8-1-2025 9-30-2025 0.2924 0.2924
Highest 1.4685 1.4685
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 6 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Energy 0.0225 0.1964 0.1099 1.2300e-
003

0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 775.6108 775.6108 0.0372 0.0109 779.7901 Mobile 0.5944 2.8341 6.7911 0.0270 2.4250 0.0207 2.4457 0.6498 0.0192 0.6691 0.0000 2,505.357 1 2,505.357
1 0.1189 0.0000 2,508.329
7 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.1090 0.0000 40.1090 2.3704 0.0000 99.3683 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.2262 87.0002 93.2264 0.6447 0.0162 114.1626 Total 1.8131 3.0618 9.6166 0.0284 2.4250 0.0513 2.4763 0.6498 0.0499 0.6997 46.3351 3,372.410 0 3,418.745
1 3.1754 0.0271 3,506.199
4 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 7 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Energy 0.0201 0.1757 0.0995 1.1000e-
003

0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 695.1540 695.1540 0.0334 9.7700e- 003
698.8993
Mobile 0.5944 2.8341 6.7911 0.0270 2.4250 0.0207 2.4457 0.6498 0.0192 0.6691 0.0000 2,505.357 1 2,505.357
1 0.1189 0.0000 2,508.329
7 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 20.0545 0.0000 20.0545 1.1852 0.0000 49.6842 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.9809 69.6002 74.5811 0.5157 0.0129 91.3300 Total 1.8107 3.0411 9.6062 0.0283 2.4250 0.0497 2.4747 0.6498 0.0482 0.6980 25.0354 3,274.553 2 3,299.588
6 1.8575 0.0227 3,352.791
9 Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.13 0.68 0.11 0.46 0.00 3.23 0.07 0.00 3.33 0.24 45.97 2.90 3.49 41.50 16.11 4.38 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 8 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.0 Construction Detail

2.3 Vegetation
CO2e
Category MT
New Trees 14.1600
Vegetation Land
Change
-23.3100
Total -9.1500
Vegetation
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2023 6/30/2023 5 22
2 Grading Grading 7/1/2023 9/29/2023 5 65
3 Paving Paving 9/1/2025 12/31/2025 5 88
4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/1/2025 12/31/2025 5 261 5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/1/2023 12/31/2024 5 327 6 Trenching Trenching 7/1/2023 12/31/2024 5 392
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.33
Acres of Paving: 4.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 9 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Trenching Trenchers 1 8.00 78 0.50
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Trips and VMT
Residential Indoor: 532,575; Residential Outdoor: 177,525; Non-Residential Indoor: 24,722; Non-Residential Outdoor: 8,241; Striped Parking Area: 10,704 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 10 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0590 0.0000 0.0590 8.9300e-
003

0.0000 8.9300e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0250 0.2363 0.2161 4.3000e-
004

0.0110 0.0110 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 37.3913 37.3913 0.0105 0.0000 37.6531 Total 0.0250 0.2363 0.2161 4.3000e-
004

0.0590 0.0110 0.0700 8.9300e-
003

0.0102 0.0191 0.0000 37.3913 37.3913 0.0105 0.0000 37.6531 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 16.00 0.00 546.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 5,094.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching 1 4.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 288.00 66.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 58.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 16.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 11 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.4400e-
003

0.0460 0.0158 2.0000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

8.0000e-
005

4.7700e-
003

1.2900e-
003

8.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

0.0000 19.7068 19.7068 1.3200e-
003

0.0000 19.7398
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.7000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

5.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.9400e-
003

5.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.3000e-
004

0.0000 1.6179 1.6179 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.6189
Total 2.1100e-
003

0.0465 0.0215 2.2000e-
004

6.6200e-
003

9.0000e-
005

6.7100e-
003

1.8000e-
003

9.0000e-
005

1.9000e-
003

0.0000 21.3247 21.3247 1.3600e-
003

0.0000 21.3587
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0230 0.0000 0.0230 3.4800e-
003

0.0000 3.4800e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0250 0.2363 0.2161 4.3000e-
004

0.0110 0.0110 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 37.3912 37.3912 0.0105 0.0000 37.6530 Total 0.0250 0.2363 0.2161 4.3000e-
004

0.0230 0.0110 0.0340 3.4800e-
003

0.0102 0.0137 0.0000 37.3912 37.3912 0.0105 0.0000 37.6530 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 12 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.4400e-
003

0.0460 0.0158 2.0000e-
004

3.7800e-
003

8.0000e-
005

3.8600e-
003

1.0600e-
003

8.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

0.0000 19.7068 19.7068 1.3200e-
003

0.0000 19.7398
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.7000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

5.6400e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.4900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5100e-
003

4.1000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.2000e-
004

0.0000 1.6179 1.6179 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.6189
Total 2.1100e-
003

0.0465 0.0215 2.2000e-
004

5.2700e-
003

9.0000e-
005

5.3700e-
003

1.4700e-
003

9.0000e-
005

1.5600e-
003

0.0000 21.3247 21.3247 1.3600e-
003

0.0000 21.3587
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1993 0.0000 0.1993 0.1081 0.0000 0.1081 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1080 1.1218 0.9117 2.0200e-
003

0.0463 0.0463 0.0426 0.0426 0.0000 177.2394 177.2394 0.0573 0.0000 178.6725 Total 0.1080 1.1218 0.9117 2.0200e-
003

0.1993 0.0463 0.2456 0.1081 0.0426 0.1507 0.0000 177.2394 177.2394 0.0573 0.0000 178.6725 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 13 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0134 0.4294 0.1475 1.8600e-
003

0.0438 7.7000e-
004

0.0446 0.0120 7.3000e-
004

0.0128 0.0000 183.8580 183.8580 0.0123 0.0000 184.1660
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4700e-
003

1.7800e-
003

0.0208 7.0000e-
005

7.1200e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.1800e-
003

1.8900e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.9400e-
003

0.0000 5.9751 5.9751 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 5.9789
Total 0.0159 0.4311 0.1683 1.9300e-
003

0.0509 8.3000e-
004

0.0517 0.0139 7.8000e-
004

0.0147 0.0000 189.8331 189.8331 0.0125 0.0000 190.1449
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0777 0.0000 0.0777 0.0422 0.0000 0.0422 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1080 1.1218 0.9117 2.0200e-
003

0.0463 0.0463 0.0426 0.0426 0.0000 177.2392 177.2392 0.0573 0.0000 178.6723 Total 0.1080 1.1218 0.9117 2.0200e-
003

0.0777 0.0463 0.1240 0.0422 0.0426 0.0847 0.0000 177.2392 177.2392 0.0573 0.0000 178.6723 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 14 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.0352 7.7000e-
004

0.0360 9.9200e-
003

7.3000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 183.8580 183.8580 0.0123 0.0000 184.1660
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4700e-
003

1.7800e-
003

0.0208 7.0000e-
005

5.5200e-
003

6.0000e-
005

5.5700e-
003

1.5000e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.5500e-
003

0.0000 5.9751 5.9751 1.5000e-
004

0.0000 5.9789
Total 0.0159 0.4311 0.1683 1.9300e-
003

0.0407 8.3000e-
004

0.0416 0.0114 7.8000e-
004

0.0122 0.0000 189.8331 189.8331 0.0125 0.0000 190.1449
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0403 0.3776 0.6414 1.0000e-
003

0.0184 0.0184 0.0169 0.0169 0.0000 88.0847 88.0847 0.0285 0.0000 88.7969 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0403 0.3776 0.6414 1.0000e-
003

0.0184 0.0184 0.0169 0.0169 0.0000 88.0847 88.0847 0.0285 0.0000 88.7969 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 15 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.4100e-
003

1.6100e-
003

0.0195 7.0000e-
005

7.7100e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.7700e-
003

2.0500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.1000e-
003

0.0000 6.0280 6.0280 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0315
Total 2.4100e-
003

1.6100e-
003

0.0195 7.0000e-
005

7.7100e-
003

6.0000e-
005

7.7700e-
003

2.0500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.1000e-
003

0.0000 6.0280 6.0280 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0315
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0403 0.3776 0.6414 1.0000e-
003

0.0184 0.0184 0.0169 0.0169 0.0000 88.0846 88.0846 0.0285 0.0000 88.7968 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0403 0.3776 0.6414 1.0000e-
003

0.0184 0.0184 0.0169 0.0169 0.0000 88.0846 88.0846 0.0285 0.0000 88.7968 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 16 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

1.6100e-
003

0.0195 7.0000e-
005

5.9800e-
003

6.0000e-
005

6.0300e-
003

1.6200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.6800e-
003

0.0000 6.0280 6.0280 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0315
Total 2.4100e-
003

1.6100e-
003

0.0195 7.0000e-
005

5.9800e-
003

6.0000e-
005

6.0300e-
003

1.6200e-
003

5.0000e-
005

1.6800e-
003

0.0000 6.0280 6.0280 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 6.0315
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

6.7200e-
003

0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 1.8200e-
003

0.0000 33.3654
Total 0.9463 0.1495 0.2361 3.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

0.0000 33.3200 33.3200 1.8200e-
003

0.0000 33.3654
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 17 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0259 0.0173 0.2096 7.2000e-
004

0.0829 6.2000e-
004

0.0836 0.0220 5.7000e-
004

0.0226 0.0000 64.8094 64.8094 1.5000e-
003

0.0000 64.8468
Total 0.0259 0.0173 0.2096 7.2000e-
004

0.0829 6.2000e-
004

0.0836 0.0220 5.7000e-
004

0.0226 0.0000 64.8094 64.8094 1.5000e-
003

0.0000 64.8468
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.9240 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0223 0.1495 0.2361 3.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

0.0000 33.3199 33.3199 1.8200e-
003

0.0000 33.3654
Total 0.9463 0.1495 0.2361 3.9000e-
004

6.7200e-
003

0.0000 33.3199 33.3199 1.8200e-
003

0.0000 33.3654
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 18 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.0643 6.2000e-
004

0.0649 0.0174 5.7000e-
004

0.0180 0.0000 64.8094 64.8094 1.5000e-
003

0.0000 64.8468
Total 0.0259 0.0173 0.2096 7.2000e-
004

0.0643 6.2000e-
004

0.0649 0.0174 5.7000e-
004

0.0180 0.0000 64.8094 64.8094 1.5000e-
003

0.0000 64.8468
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0511 0.4675 0.5279 8.8000e-
004

0.0227 0.0227 0.0214 0.0214 0.0000 75.3365 75.3365 0.0179 0.0000 75.7846 Total 0.0511 0.4675 0.5279 8.8000e-
004

0.0227 0.0227 0.0214 0.0214 0.0000 75.3365 75.3365 0.0179 0.0000 75.7846 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 19 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.1520 0.0487 5.2000e-
004

0.0135 1.8000e-
004

0.0137 3.9000e-
003

1.7000e-
004

4.0700e-
003

0.0000 50.7684 50.7684 2.7700e-
003

0.0000 50.8375
Worker 0.0355 0.0256 0.2999 9.5000e-
004

0.1026 8.0000e-
004

0.1034 0.0272 7.3000e-
004

0.0280 0.0000 86.0408 86.0408 2.2200e-
003

0.0000 86.0962
Total 0.0402 0.1776 0.3486 1.4700e-
003

0.1161 9.8000e-
004

0.1171 0.0311 9.0000e-
004

0.0320 0.0000 136.8092 136.8092 4.9900e-
003

0.0000 136.9337
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0511 0.4675 0.5279 8.8000e-
004

0.0227 0.0227 0.0214 0.0214 0.0000 75.3365 75.3365 0.0179 0.0000 75.7845 Total 0.0511 0.4675 0.5279 8.8000e-
004

0.0227 0.0227 0.0214 0.0214 0.0000 75.3365 75.3365 0.0179 0.0000 75.7845 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 20 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.1520 0.0487 5.2000e-
004

0.0110 1.8000e-
004

0.0112 3.2900e-
003

1.7000e-
004

3.4600e-
003

0.0000 50.7684 50.7684 2.7700e-
003

0.0000 50.8375
Worker 0.0355 0.0256 0.2999 9.5000e-
004

0.0795 8.0000e-
004

0.0803 0.0216 7.3000e-
004

0.0223 0.0000 86.0408 86.0408 2.2200e-
003

0.0000 86.0962
Total 0.0402 0.1776 0.3486 1.4700e-
003

0.0905 9.8000e-
004

0.0915 0.0249 9.0000e-
004

0.0258 0.0000 136.8092 136.8092 4.9900e-
003

0.0000 136.9337
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 21 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0183 0.6102 0.1904 2.1000e-
003

0.0545 7.0000e-
004

0.0552 0.0157 6.7000e-
004

0.0164 0.0000 203.8204 203.8204 0.0110 0.0000 204.0950
Worker 0.1356 0.0942 1.1257 3.7200e-
003

0.4134 3.1600e-
003

0.4166 0.1098 2.9100e-
003

0.1127 0.0000 336.0575 336.0575 8.1800e-
003

0.0000 336.2620
Total 0.1538 0.7043 1.3161 5.8200e-
003

0.4679 3.8600e-
003

0.4718 0.1255 3.5800e-
003

0.1291 0.0000 539.8779 539.8779 0.0192 0.0000 540.3571
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e-
003

0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 22 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

0.0444 7.0000e-
004

0.0452 0.0133 6.7000e-
004

0.0139 0.0000 203.8204 203.8204 0.0110 0.0000 204.0950
Worker 0.1356 0.0942 1.1257 3.7200e-
003

0.3203 3.1600e-
003

0.3234 0.0869 2.9100e-
003

0.0899 0.0000 336.0575 336.0575 8.1800e-
003

0.0000 336.2620
Total 0.1538 0.7043 1.3161 5.8200e-
003

0.3647 3.8600e-
003

0.3686 0.1002 3.5800e-
003

0.1038 0.0000 539.8779 539.8779 0.0192 0.0000 540.3571
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Trenching - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0227 0.2112 0.1693 2.2000e-
004

0.0147 0.0147 0.0135 0.0135 0.0000 19.3905 19.3905 6.2700e- 003

0.0000 19.5473
Total 0.0227 0.2112 0.1693 2.2000e-
004

0.0147 0.0147 0.0135 0.0135 0.0000 19.3905 19.3905 6.2700e- 003

0.0000 19.5473
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 23 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.7 Trenching - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.9000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

8.3300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8700e-
003

7.6000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.3900 2.3900 6.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.3916
Total 9.9000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

8.3300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.8500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8700e-
003

7.6000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.3900 2.3900 6.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.3916
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0227 0.2112 0.1693 2.2000e-
004

0.0147 0.0147 0.0135 0.0135 0.0000 19.3904 19.3904 6.2700e- 003

0.0000 19.5472
Total 0.0227 0.2112 0.1693 2.2000e-
004

0.0147 0.0147 0.0135 0.0135 0.0000 19.3904 19.3904 6.2700e- 003

0.0000 19.5472
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 24 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

7.1000e-
004

8.3300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.2100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.2300e-
003

6.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.3900 2.3900 6.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.3916
Total 9.9000e-
004

7.1000e-
004

8.3300e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.2100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.2300e-
003

6.0000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

6.2000e-
004

0.0000 2.3900 2.3900 6.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.3916
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Trenching - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0448 0.4160 0.3413 4.4000e-
004

0.0288 0.0288 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 39.0745 39.0745 0.0126 0.0000 39.3904 Total 0.0448 0.4160 0.3413 4.4000e-
004

0.0288 0.0288 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 39.0745 39.0745 0.0126 0.0000 39.3904 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 25 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

3.7 Trenching - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.8800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

0.0156 5.0000e-
005

5.7400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.7900e-
003

1.5300e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.5700e-
003

0.0000 4.6675 4.6675 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.6703
Total 1.8800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

0.0156 5.0000e-
005

5.7400e-
003

4.0000e-
005

5.7900e-
003

1.5300e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.5700e-
003

0.0000 4.6675 4.6675 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.6703
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0448 0.4160 0.3413 4.4000e-
004

0.0288 0.0288 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 39.0745 39.0745 0.0126 0.0000 39.3904 Total 0.0448 0.4160 0.3413 4.4000e-
004

0.0288 0.0288 0.0265 0.0265 0.0000 39.0745 39.0745 0.0126 0.0000 39.3904 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 26 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

1.3100e-
003

0.0156 5.0000e-
005

4.4500e-
003

4.0000e-
005

4.4900e-
003

1.2100e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.2500e-
003

0.0000 4.6675 4.6675 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.6703
Total 1.8800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

0.0156 5.0000e-
005

4.4500e-
003

4.0000e-
005

4.4900e-
003

1.2100e-
003

4.0000e-
005

1.2500e-
003

0.0000 4.6675 4.6675 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 4.6703
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 27 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.5944 2.8341 6.7911 0.0270 2.4250 0.0207 2.4457 0.6498 0.0192 0.6691 0.0000 2,505.357 1 2,505.357
1 0.1189 0.0000 2,508.329
7 Unmitigated 0.5944 2.8341 6.7911 0.0270 2.4250 0.0207 2.4457 0.6498 0.0192 0.6691 0.0000 2,505.357 1 2,505.357
1 0.1189 0.0000 2,508.329
7 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 681.17 654.87 599.64 2,275,023 2,275,023 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 392.18 488.46 406.65 556,039 556,039 Regional Shopping Center 438.16 512.76 258.95 915,349 915,349 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,532.49 1,489.68 1070.17 2,644,721 2,644,721 Total 3,044.00 3,145.77 2,335.42 6,391,132 6,391,132
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 28 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down
Rt t )

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Th

16.60 8.40 6.90 1.50 79.50 19.00 51 37 12

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 City Park 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.117175 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.117175 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0 .000834 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Regional Shopping Center 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru

0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 29 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 495.8410 495.8410 0.0296 6.1100e- 003
498.4018
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 552.5161 552.5161 0.0329 6.8100e- 003
555.3697
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0201 0.1757 0.0995 1.1000e-
003

0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 199.3130 199.3130 3.8200e- 003

3.6500e-
003
200.4974
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0225 0.1964 0.1099 1.2300e-
003

0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 223.0947 223.0947 4.2800e- 003

4.0900e-
003
224.4204
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 30 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

2.88726e
+006

0.0156 0.1330 0.0566 8.5000e-
004

0.0108 0.0108 0.0108 0.0108 0.0000 154.0753 154.0753 2.9500e- 003

2.8200e-
003
154.9909
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
468674 2.5300e-
003

0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004

1.7500e-
003

0.0000 25.0102 25.0102 4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

25.1588
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
806737 4.3500e-
003

0.0396 0.0332 2.4000e-
004

3.0100e-
003

0.0000 43.0506 43.0506 8.3000e-
004

7.9000e-
004

43.3064
Regional
Shopping Center
17964.6 1.0000e-
004

8.8000e-
004

7.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.9587 0.9587 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9644
Total 0.0226 0.1964 0.1099 1.2400e-
003

0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0000 223.0947 223.0947 4.2800e- 003

4.0900e-
003
224.4204
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 31 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

2.51665e
+006

0.0136 0.1160 0.0494 7.4000e-
004

9.3800e-
003

0.0000 134.2982 134.2982 2.5700e-
003

2.4600e-
003
135.0963
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
442486 2.3900e-
003

0.0217 0.0182 1.3000e-
004

1.6500e-
003

0.0000 23.6127 23.6127 4.5000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

23.7531
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
761660 4.1100e-
003

0.0373 0.0314 2.2000e-
004

2.8400e-
003

0.0000 40.6451 40.6451 7.8000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

40.8866
Regional
Shopping Center
14185.4 8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
004

5.8000e-
004

0.0000 5.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7570 0.7570 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.7615
Total 0.0202 0.1757 0.0995 1.0900e-
003

0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0139 0.0000 199.3130 199.3130 3.8100e- 003

3.6500e-
003
200.4974
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 32 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.0661e
+006
235.2989 0.0140 2.9000e-
003
236.5141
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.04542e
+006
230.7345 0.0138 2.8500e-
003
231.9261
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
89648.3 19.7862 1.1800e-
003

2.4000e-
004

19.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
154313 34.0584 2.0300e-
003

4.2000e-
004

34.2343
Regional
Shopping Center
147879 32.6382 1.9500e-
003

4.0000e-
004

32.8068
Total 552.5161 0.0329 6.8100e-
003
555.3697
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 33 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.04574e
+006
230.8045 0.0138 2.8500e-
003
231.9965
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
835626 184.4301 0.0110 2.2700e-
003
185.3826
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
84706.9 18.6956 1.1100e-
003

2.3000e-
004

18.7921
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
145808 32.1811 1.9200e-
003

4.0000e-
004

32.3473
Regional
Shopping Center
134701 29.7298 1.7700e-
003

3.7000e-
004

29.8833
Total 495.8410 0.0296 6.1200e-
003
498.4018
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 34 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.1961 0.0313 2.7156 1.4000e-
004

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Unmitigated 1.1961 0.0313 2.7156 1.4000e-
004

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0924 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.0218 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0819 0.0313 2.7156 1.4000e-
004

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Total 1.1961 0.0313 2.7156 1.4000e-
004

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 35 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0924 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Total 1.1961 0.0313 2.7156 1.4000e-
004

0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0151 0.0000 4.4419 4.4419 4.2700e- 003

0.0000 4.5487
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 36 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 74.5811 0.5157 0.0129 91.3300
Unmitigated 93.2264 0.6447 0.0162 114.1626
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 37 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

17.1355 /

10.8028

81.1706 0.5629 0.0141 99.4496
City Park 0 /

1.07233

2.6294 1.6000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

2.6430
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru

0.616173 /

0.0393302

2.0627 0.0202 5.0000e-
004

2.7156
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.06237 /

0.0678107

3.5564 0.0348 8.6000e-
004

4.6821
Regional
Shopping Center

0.811094 /

0.497122

3.8073 0.0266 6.7000e-
004

4.6723
Total 93.2264 0.6447 0.0162 114.1626
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 38 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

13.7084 /

8.64226

64.9365 0.4503 0.0113 79.5597
City Park 0 /

0.857867

2.1036 1.3000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

2.1144
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru

0.492939 /

0.0314642

1.6502 0.0162 4.0000e-
004

2.1725
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

0.849894 /

0.0542486

2.8451 0.0279 6.9000e-
004

3.7456
Regional
Shopping Center

0.648875 /

0.397698

3.0458 0.0213 5.3000e-
004

3.7379
Total 74.5811 0.5157 0.0129 91.3301
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 39 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 20.0545 1.1852 0.0000 49.6842
Unmitigated 40.1090 2.3704 0.0000 99.3683
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 40 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
120.98 24.5579 1.4513 0.0000 60.8410
City Park 0.08 0.0162 9.6000e-
004

0.0000 0.0402
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru

23.38 4.7459 0.2805 0.0000 11.7578
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

41.65 8.4546 0.4997 0.0000 20.9459
Regional
Shopping Center

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Total 40.1090 2.3704 0.0000 99.3683
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 41 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

60.49 12.2789 0.7257 0.0000 30.4205
City Park 0.04 8.1200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

0.0000 0.0201
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru

11.69 2.3730 0.1402 0.0000 5.8789
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

20.825 4.2273 0.2498 0.0000 10.4729
Regional
Shopping Center

5.75 1.1672 0.0690 0.0000 2.8917
Total 20.0545 1.1852 0.0000 49.6842
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 42 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

11.0 Vegetation
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT
Unmitigated -9.1500 0.0000 0.0000 -9.1500
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 43 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

11.1 Vegetation Land Change
Initial/Fina
l
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Acres MT
Trees 0.21 / 0 -23.3100 0.0000 0.0000 -23.3100
Total -23.3100 0.0000 0.0000 -23.3100
Vegetation Type

11.2 Net New Trees
Number of
Trees
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT
Miscellaneous 20 14.1600 0.0000 0.0000 14.1600
Total 14.1600 0.0000 0.0000 14.1600
Species Class
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 12:59 PMPage 44 of 44 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pasadena Water & Power
2026Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
486.58 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
E Green St Proposed Unmit
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 1 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - 2018 PCL
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Data provided by applicant.

Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT - Rounded to even numbers due to one way trip count.

Demolition -
Grading - Data provided by applicant.

Vehicle Trips - TIA and adjusted weekend trip rates.

Woodstoves - no hearths
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - All outdoor water use assumed under city park land use. Assumed 100% aerobic.

Solid Waste - City park land use represents open space.

Land Use Change -
Sequestration -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Dust control measures.

Energy Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards
Water Mitigation - 2019 Calgreen standards
Waste Mitigation - AB341
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 26 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 261.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 327.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 65.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 88.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 2 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/25/2024 12/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/30/2024 12/31/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/26/2023 6/30/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/7/2023 9/29/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/27/2024 12/31/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/28/2024 1/1/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/8/2023 10/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2023 6/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/27/2023 7/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/31/2024 9/1/2025
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 223.55 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 26.30 263.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 13.15 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 162.50 2.33
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 40,741.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Trenchers
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1664.14 486.58 tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 545.00 546.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 5,093.00 5,094.00
tblTripsAndVMT PhaseName Trenching
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 3.00 4.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 3 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 287.00 288.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 57.00 58.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 2.49
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 22.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 139.72
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 46.81
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 696.00 733.47
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 2.28
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 16.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 116.32
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 23.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 500.00 526.92
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 2.59
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 112.18
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 40.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 716.00 754.55
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 13.15 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 13.15 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 4 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 4.1685 50.7058 35.9312 0.1257 7.7697 1.6753 9.4450 3.7719 1.5421 5.3140 0.0000 12,876.151 1 12,876.151
1 2.4699 0.0000 12,937.89
74 2024 2.9911 21.8663 29.4752 0.0766 3.6864 0.8627 4.5492 0.9873 0.8066 1.7938 0.0000 7,614.195 7 7,614.195
7 0.8741 0.0000 7,636.047
9 2025 8.4173 9.8758 18.5797 0.0331 0.8271 0.4761 1.3033 0.2194 0.4421 0.6615 0.0000 3,217.785 1 3,217.785
1 0.7460 0.0000 3,236.434
9 Maximum 8.4173 50.7058 35.9312 0.1257 7.7697 1.6753 9.4450 3.7719 1.5421 5.3140 0.0000 12,876.15 11 12,876.15
11 2.4699 0.0000 12,937.89
74 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 4.1685 50.7058 35.9312 0.1257 3.6998 1.6753 5.3751 1.6626 1.5421 3.2047 0.0000 12,876.15 11 12,876.15
11 2.4699 0.0000 12,937.89
74 2024 2.9911 21.8663 29.4752 0.0766 2.8704 0.8627 3.7331 0.7870 0.8066 1.5935 0.0000 7,614.195 7 7,614.195
7 0.8741 0.0000 7,636.047
9 2025 8.4173 9.8758 18.5797 0.0331 0.6402 0.4761 1.1163 0.1735 0.4421 0.6156 0.0000 3,217.785 1 3,217.785
1 0.7460 0.0000 3,236.434
9 Maximum 8.4173 50.7058 35.9312 0.1257 3.6998 1.6753 5.3751 1.6626 1.5421 3.2047 0.0000 12,876.15 11 12,876.15
11 2.4699 0.0000 12,937.89
74 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 5 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.30 0.00 33.16 47.31 0.00 30.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 6 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Energy 0.1235 1.0764 0.6020 6.7400e-
003

0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 1,347.505
7 1,347.505
7 0.0258 0.0247 1,355.513
3 Mobile 3.7697 16.4021 41.3283 0.1656 14.6209 0.1225 14.7435 3.9117 0.1137 4.0254 16,919.44 38 16,919.44
38 0.7769 16,938.86
57 Total 10.6536 17.7286 63.6548 0.1735 14.6209 0.3283 14.9492 3.9117 0.3195 4.2312 0.0000 18,306.12 02 18,306.12
02 0.8404 0.0247 18,334.49
16 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 6.7604 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Energy 0.1104 0.9627 0.5453 6.0200e-
003

0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 1,203.862
9 1,203.862
9 0.0231 0.0221 1,211.016 9
Mobile 3.7697 16.4021 41.3283 0.1656 14.6209 0.1225 14.7435 3.9117 0.1137 4.0254 16,919.44 38 16,919.44
38 0.7769 16,938.86
57 Total 10.6404 17.6149 63.5980 0.1727 14.6209 0.3192 14.9401 3.9117 0.3104 4.2221 0.0000 18,162.47 74 18,162.47
74 0.8376 0.0221 18,189.99
52 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 7 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2023 6/30/2023 5 22
2 Grading Grading 7/1/2023 9/29/2023 5 65
3 Paving Paving 9/1/2025 12/31/2025 5 88
4 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/1/2025 12/31/2025 5 261 5 Building Construction Building Construction 10/1/2023 12/31/2024 5 327 6 Trenching Trenching 7/1/2023 12/31/2024 5 392
OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.12 0.64 0.09 0.42 0.00 2.77 0.06 0.00 2.85 0.22 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.33 10.65 0.79 Residential Indoor: 532,575; Residential Outdoor: 177,525; Non-Residential Indoor: 24,722; Non-Residential Outdoor: 8,241; Striped Parking Area: 10,704 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.33
Acres of Paving: 4.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 8 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Trenching Trenchers 1 8.00 78 0.50
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 9 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 5.3643 0.0000 5.3643 0.8122 0.0000 0.8122 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 5.3643 0.9975 6.3619 0.8122 0.9280 1.7402 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 16.00 0.00 546.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 5,094.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching 1 4.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 288.00 66.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 58.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 16.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 10 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1292 4.0799 1.4104 0.0183 0.4340 7.3900e-
003

0.4414 0.1190 7.0700e-
003

0.1260 1,989.338
1 1,989.338
1 0.1307 1,992.605
6 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0603 0.0385 0.5475 1.7000e-
003

0.1788 1.3600e-
003

0.1802 0.0474 1.2500e-
003

0.0487 169.3571 169.3571 4.3700e-
003
169.4665
Total 0.1895 4.1184 1.9579 0.0200 0.6128 8.7500e-
003

0.6216 0.1664 8.3200e-
003

0.1747 2,158.695
3 2,158.695
3 0.1351 2,162.072
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.0921 0.0000 2.0921 0.3168 0.0000 0.3168 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 2.0921 0.9975 3.0896 0.3168 0.9280 1.2448 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 11 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

0.3561 0.0980 7.0700e-
003

0.1051 1,989.338
1 1,989.338
1 0.1307 1,992.605
6 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0603 0.0385 0.5475 1.7000e-
003

0.1384 1.3600e-
003

0.1398 0.0375 1.2500e-
003

0.0388 169.3571 169.3571 4.3700e-
003
169.4665
Total 0.1895 4.1184 1.9579 0.0200 0.4871 8.7500e-
003

0.4959 0.1355 8.3200e-
003

0.1439 2,158.695
3 2,158.695
3 0.1351 2,162.072
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.1310 0.0000 6.1310 3.3251 0.0000 3.3251 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.083 6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 6.1310 1.4245 7.5555 3.3251 1.3105 4.6356 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 12 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.4079 12.8831 4.4537 0.0577 1.3705 0.0233 1.3938 0.3757 0.0223 0.3980 6,281.801 8 6,281.801
8 0.4127 6,292.119 5
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0754 0.0482 0.6844 2.1200e-
003

0.2236 1.7000e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5700e-
003

0.0609 211.6964 211.6964 5.4700e-
003
211.8331
Total 0.4833 12.9313 5.1381 0.0598 1.5940 0.0250 1.6190 0.4350 0.0239 0.4589 6,493.498 2 6,493.498
2 0.4182 6,503.952
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.3911 0.0000 2.3911 1.2968 0.0000 1.2968 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.083 6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 2.3911 1.4245 3.8156 1.2968 1.3105 2.6073 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 13 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.4079 12.8831 4.4537 0.0577 1.1011 0.0233 1.1244 0.3096 0.0223 0.3319 6,281.801 8 6,281.801
8 0.4127 6,292.119 5
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0754 0.0482 0.6844 2.1200e-
003

0.1730 1.7000e-
003

0.1747 0.0469 1.5700e-
003

0.0485 211.6964 211.6964 5.4700e-
003
211.8331
Total 0.4833 12.9313 5.1381 0.0598 1.2741 0.0250 1.2991 0.3564 0.0239 0.3803 6,493.498 2 6,493.498
2 0.4182 6,503.952
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 14 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.4 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0542 0.0322 0.4741 1.5800e-
003

0.1788 1.3100e-
003

0.1802 0.0474 1.2100e-
003

0.0486 157.7496 157.7496 3.6600e-
003
157.8411
Total 0.0542 0.0322 0.4741 1.5800e-
003

0.1788 1.3100e-
003

0.1802 0.0474 1.2100e-
003

0.0486 157.7496 157.7496 3.6600e-
003
157.8411
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 15 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

0.1384 1.3100e-
003

0.1397 0.0375 1.2100e-
003

0.0387 157.7496 157.7496 3.6600e-
003
157.8411
Total 0.0542 0.0322 0.4741 1.5800e-
003

0.1384 1.3100e-
003

0.1397 0.0375 1.2100e-
003

0.0387 157.7496 157.7496 3.6600e-
003
157.8411
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 7.2515 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 16 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.5 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1964 0.1165 1.7185 5.7400e-
003

0.6483 4.7600e-
003

0.6531 0.1719 4.3800e-
003

0.1763 571.8423 571.8423 0.0133 572.1741
Total 0.1964 0.1165 1.7185 5.7400e-
003

0.6483 4.7600e-
003

0.6531 0.1719 4.3800e-
003

0.1763 571.8423 571.8423 0.0133 572.1741
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 7.0807 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 7.2515 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 17 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

0.5018 4.7600e-
003

0.5065 0.1360 4.3800e-
003

0.1403 571.8423 571.8423 0.0133 572.1741
Total 0.1964 0.1165 1.7185 5.7400e-
003

0.5018 4.7600e-
003

0.5065 0.1360 4.3800e-
003

0.1403 571.8423 571.8423 0.0133 572.1741
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 18 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1397 4.6237 1.4314 0.0163 0.4226 5.3400e-
003

0.4279 0.1217 5.1100e-
003

0.1268 1,741.789
0 1,741.789
0 0.0915 1,744.075
4 Worker 1.0859 0.6935 9.8558 0.0306 3.2192 0.0245 3.2436 0.8537 0.0225 0.8763 3,048.428 1 3,048.428
1 0.0787 3,050.396
8 Total 1.2256 5.3172 11.2872 0.0469 3.6417 0.0298 3.6715 0.9754 0.0277 1.0031 4,790.217 2 4,790.217
2 0.1702 4,794.472
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 19 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1397 4.6237 1.4314 0.0163 0.3443 5.3400e-
003

0.3496 0.1025 5.1100e-
003

0.1076 1,741.789
0 1,741.789
0 0.0915 1,744.075
4 Worker 1.0859 0.6935 9.8558 0.0306 2.4915 0.0245 2.5160 0.6751 0.0225 0.6977 3,048.428 1 3,048.428
1 0.0787 3,050.396
8 Total 1.2256 5.3172 11.2872 0.0469 2.8358 0.0298 2.8656 0.7776 0.0277 0.8052 4,790.217 2 4,790.217
2 0.1702 4,794.472
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 20 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1363 4.6061 1.3878 0.0162 0.4226 5.2700e-
003

0.4279 0.1217 5.0400e-
003

0.1267 1,734.720
4 1,734.720
4 0.0902 1,736.974
3 Worker 1.0273 0.6324 9.1878 0.0296 3.2192 0.0241 3.2433 0.8537 0.0222 0.8760 2,953.953 4 2,953.953
4 0.0722 2,955.759
5 Total 1.1636 5.2385 10.5757 0.0458 3.6417 0.0294 3.6711 0.9754 0.0273 1.0027 4,688.673 8 4,688.673
8 0.1624 4,692.733
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 21 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1363 4.6061 1.3878 0.0162 0.3443 5.2700e-
003

0.3496 0.1025 5.0400e-
003

0.1075 1,734.720
4 1,734.720
4 0.0902 1,736.974
3 Worker 1.0273 0.6324 9.1878 0.0296 2.4915 0.0241 2.5156 0.6751 0.0222 0.6974 2,953.953 4 2,953.953
4 0.0722 2,955.759
5 Total 1.1636 5.2385 10.5757 0.0458 2.8358 0.0294 2.8652 0.7776 0.0273 0.8049 4,688.673 8 4,688.673
8 0.1624 4,692.733
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Trenching - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Total 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 22 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.7 Trenching - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0151 9.6300e-
003

0.1369 4.2000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 42.3393 42.3393 1.0900e-
003

42.3666
Total 0.0151 9.6300e-
003

0.1369 4.2000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 42.3393 42.3393 1.0900e-
003

42.3666
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 0.0000 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Total 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 0.0000 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 23 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

0.1369 4.2000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

42.3393 42.3393 1.0900e-
003

42.3666
Total 0.0151 9.6300e-
003

0.1369 4.2000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

42.3393 42.3393 1.0900e-
003

42.3666
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Trenching - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Total 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 24 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

3.7 Trenching - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0143 8.7800e-
003

0.1276 4.1000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 41.0271 41.0271 1.0000e-
003

41.0522
Total 0.0143 8.7800e-
003

0.1276 4.1000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 41.0271 41.0271 1.0000e-
003

41.0522
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 0.0000 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Total 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 0.0000 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 25 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

0.1276 4.1000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

41.0271 41.0271 1.0000e-
003

41.0522
Total 0.0143 8.7800e-
003

0.1276 4.1000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

41.0271 41.0271 1.0000e-
003

41.0522
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 26 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.7697 16.4021 41.3283 0.1656 14.6209 0.1225 14.7435 3.9117 0.1137 4.0254 16,919.44 38 16,919.44
38 0.7769 16,938.86
57 Unmitigated 3.7697 16.4021 41.3283 0.1656 14.6209 0.1225 14.7435 3.9117 0.1137 4.0254 16,919.44 38 16,919.44
38 0.7769 16,938.86
57 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 681.17 654.87 599.64 2,275,023 2,275,023 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 392.18 488.46 406.65 556,039 556,039 Regional Shopping Center 438.16 512.76 258.95 915,349 915,349 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,532.49 1,489.68 1070.17 2,644,721 2,644,721 Total 3,044.00 3,145.77 2,335.42 6,391,132 6,391,132
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 27 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down
Rt t )

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Th

16.60 8.40 6.90 1.50 79.50 19.00 51 37 12

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.117175 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 City Park 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.117175 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 28 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1104 0.9627 0.5453 6.0200e-
003

0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 1,203.862
9 1,203.862
9 0.0231 0.0221 1,211.016 9
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1235 1.0764 0.6020 6.7400e-
003

0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 1,347.505
7 1,347.505
7 0.0258 0.0247 1,355.513
3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 29 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
7910.31 0.0853 0.7290 0.3102 4.6500e-
003

0.0589 0.0589 0.0589 0.0589 930.6241 930.6241 0.0178 0.0171 936.1544 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru
1284.04 0.0139 0.1259 0.1057 7.6000e-
004

9.5700e-
003

9.5700e-
003
151.0632 151.0632 2.9000e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.9609
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
2210.24 0.0238 0.2167 0.1820 1.3000e-
003

0.0165 0.0165 0.0165 0.0165 260.0280 260.0280 4.9800e-
003

4.7700e-
003
261.5733
Regional
Shopping Center

49.218 5.3000e-
004

4.8300e-
003

4.0500e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

5.7904 5.7904 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

5.8248
Total 0.1235 1.0764 0.6020 6.7400e-
003

0.0854 0.0854 0.0854 0.0854 1,347.505
7 1,347.505
7 0.0258 0.0247 1,355.513
3 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 30 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

6.89494 0.0744 0.6354 0.2704 4.0600e-
003

0.0514 0.0514 0.0514 0.0514 811.1697 811.1697 0.0156 0.0149 815.9900 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Fast Food
Restaurant w/o
Drive Thru

1.21229 0.0131 0.1189 0.0998 7.1000e-
004

9.0300e-
003

9.0300e-
003
142.6224 142.6224 2.7300e-
003

2.6100e-
003
143.4699
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

2.08674 0.0225 0.2046 0.1719 1.2300e-
003

0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 245.4986 245.4986 4.7100e-
003

4.5000e-
003
246.9575
Regional
Shopping Center

0.0388642 4.2000e-
004

3.8100e-
003

3.2000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

4.5723 4.5723 9.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.5994
Total 0.1104 0.9627 0.5453 6.0200e-
003

0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 1,203.862
9 1,203.862
9 0.0231 0.0221 1,211.016
9 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 31 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 6.7604 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Unmitigated 6.7604 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

5.5989 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.6552 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 40.1126 Total 6.7605 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 32 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

0.5063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 40.1126 Total 6.7605 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 33 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:00 PMPage 34 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
12 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pasadena Water & Power
2026Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
486.58 0.029 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
E Green St Proposed Unmit
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 1 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - 2018 PCL
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Data provided by applicant.

Off-road Equipment -
Trips and VMT - Rounded to even numbers due to one way trip count.

Demolition -
Grading - Data provided by applicant.

Vehicle Trips - TIA and adjusted weekend trip rates.

Woodstoves - no hearths
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater - All outdoor water use assumed under city park land use. Assumed 100% aerobic.

Solid Waste - City park land use represents open space.

Land Use Change -
Sequestration -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Dust control measures.

Energy Mitigation - 2019 Title 24 standards
Water Mitigation - 2019 Calgreen standards
Waste Mitigation - AB341
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 26 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 261.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 327.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 22.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 65.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 88.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 2 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/25/2024 12/31/2025 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/30/2024 12/31/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/26/2023 6/30/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/7/2023 9/29/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/27/2024 12/31/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/28/2024 1/1/2025
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/8/2023 10/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/1/2023 6/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/27/2023 7/1/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/31/2024 9/1/2025
tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 223.55 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 26.30 263.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 13.15 0.00
tblGrading AcresOfGrading 162.50 2.33
tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 40,741.00
tblOffRoadEquipment LoadFactor 0.50 0.50
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentType Trenchers
tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1664.14 486.58 tblSequestration NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 20.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 545.00 546.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 5,093.00 5,094.00
tblTripsAndVMT PhaseName Trenching
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 3.00 4.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 3 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 287.00 288.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 57.00 58.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 2.49
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 22.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 139.72
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 46.81
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 696.00 733.47
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 2.28
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 16.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 116.32
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 23.64
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 500.00 526.92
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 2.59
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 0.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 112.18
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 40.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 716.00 754.55
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 13.15 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 13.15 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 4 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 4.1895 50.8025 36.0485 0.1246 7.7697 1.6759 9.4456 3.7719 1.5428 5.3146 0.0000 12,752.18 66 12,752.18
66 2.4813 0.0000 12,814.21
81 2024 3.1256 21.9144 28.7584 0.0744 3.6864 0.8630 4.5494 0.9873 0.8068 1.7941 0.0000 7,392.562 6 7,392.562
6 0.8746 0.0000 7,414.427
7 2025 8.4489 9.8915 18.3800 0.0327 0.8271 0.4761 1.3033 0.2194 0.4421 0.6615 0.0000 3,175.221 7 3,175.221
7 0.7449 0.0000 3,193.844
4 Maximum 8.4489 50.8025 36.0485 0.1246 7.7697 1.6759 9.4456 3.7719 1.5428 5.3146 0.0000 12,752.18 66 12,752.18
66 2.4813 0.0000 12,814.21
81 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 4.1895 50.8025 36.0485 0.1246 3.6998 1.6759 5.3757 1.6626 1.5428 3.2053 0.0000 12,752.18 66 12,752.18
66 2.4813 0.0000 12,814.21
81 2024 3.1256 21.9144 28.7584 0.0744 2.8704 0.8630 3.7334 0.7870 0.8068 1.5938 0.0000 7,392.562 6 7,392.562
6 0.8746 0.0000 7,414.427
7 2025 8.4489 9.8915 18.3800 0.0327 0.6402 0.4761 1.1163 0.1735 0.4421 0.6156 0.0000 3,175.221 7 3,175.221
7 0.7449 0.0000 3,193.844
4 Maximum 8.4489 50.8025 36.0485 0.1246 3.6998 1.6759 5.3757 1.6626 1.5428 3.2053 0.0000 12,752.18 66 12,752.18
66 2.4813 0.0000 12,814.21
81 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 5 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.30 0.00 33.16 47.31 0.00 30.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 6 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Energy 0.1235 1.0764 0.6020 6.7400e-
003

0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 1,347.505
7 1,347.505
7 0.0258 0.0247 1,355.513
3 Mobile 3.6428 16.5964 39.8502 0.1575 14.6209 0.1231 14.7441 3.9117 0.1143 4.0260 16,097.72 58 16,097.72
58 0.7833 16,117.307
3 Total 10.5268 17.9229 62.1767 0.1654 14.6209 0.3289 14.9499 3.9117 0.3201 4.2318 0.0000 17,484.40 21 17,484.40
21 0.8468 0.0247 17,512.93
32 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 6.7604 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Energy 0.1104 0.9627 0.5453 6.0200e-
003

0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 1,203.862
9 1,203.862
9 0.0231 0.0221 1,211.016 9
Mobile 3.6428 16.5964 39.8502 0.1575 14.6209 0.1231 14.7441 3.9117 0.1143 4.0260 16,097.72 58 16,097.72
58 0.7833 16,117.307
3 Total 10.5136 17.8091 62.1200 0.1646 14.6209 0.3198 14.9408 3.9117 0.3110 4.2227 0.0000 17,340.75 93 17,340.75
93 0.8440 0.0221 17,368.43
68 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 7 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.13 0.63 0.09 0.44 0.00 2.77 0.06 0.00 2.84 0.22 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.33 10.65 0.83 Residential Indoor: 532,575; Residential Outdoor: 177,525; Non-Residential Indoor: 24,722; Non-Residential Outdoor: 8,241; Striped Parking Area: 10,704 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.33
Acres of Paving: 4.01
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 8 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Trenching Trenchers 1 8.00 78 0.50
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 9 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Soil Stabilizer
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 16.00 0.00 546.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 5,094.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching 1 4.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 288.00 66.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 58.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 16.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 10 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.4416 0.1190 7.2700e-
003

0.1262 1,954.774
8 1,954.774
8 0.1344 1,958.135
8 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0675 0.0426 0.4988 1.6000e-
003

0.1788 1.3600e-
003

0.1802 0.0474 1.2500e-
003

0.0487 159.4753 159.4753 4.1000e-
003
159.5779
Total 0.1999 4.1512 1.9695 0.0196 0.6128 8.9600e-
003

0.6218 0.1664 8.5200e-
003

0.1749 2,114.250
1 2,114.250
1 0.1385 2,117.713
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.0921 0.0000 2.0921 0.3168 0.0000 0.3168 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 2.0921 0.9975 3.0896 0.3168 0.9280 1.2448 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 11 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1324 4.1085 1.4707 0.0180 0.3487 7.6000e-
003

0.3563 0.0980 7.2700e-
003

0.1053 1,954.774
8 1,954.774
8 0.1344 1,958.135
8 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0675 0.0426 0.4988 1.6000e-
003

0.1384 1.3600e-
003

0.1398 0.0375 1.2500e-
003

0.0388 159.4753 159.4753 4.1000e-
003
159.5779
Total 0.1999 4.1512 1.9695 0.0196 0.4871 8.9600e-
003

0.4961 0.1355 8.5200e-
003

0.1441 2,114.250
1 2,114.250
1 0.1385 2,117.713
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.1310 0.0000 6.1310 3.3251 0.0000 3.3251 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 6.1310 1.4245 7.5555 3.3251 1.3105 4.6356 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 12 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.4181 12.9736 4.6440 0.0567 1.3705 0.0240 1.3944 0.3757 0.0230 0.3986 6,172.660 1 6,172.660
1 0.4245 6,183.273
0 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0844 0.0533 0.6235 2.0000e-
003

0.2236 1.7000e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5700e-
003

0.0609 199.3441 199.3441 5.1300e-
003
199.4724
Total 0.5025 13.0269 5.2676 0.0587 1.5940 0.0257 1.6197 0.4350 0.0245 0.4595 6,372.004 2 6,372.004
2 0.4297 6,382.745
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 2.3911 0.0000 2.3911 1.2968 0.0000 1.2968 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.083 6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 2.3911 1.4245 3.8156 1.2968 1.3105 2.6073 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 13 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.4181 12.9736 4.6440 0.0567 1.1011 0.0240 1.1251 0.3096 0.0230 0.3325 6,172.660 1 6,172.660
1 0.4245 6,183.273
0 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0844 0.0533 0.6235 2.0000e-
003

0.1730 1.7000e-
003

0.1747 0.0469 1.5700e-
003

0.0485 199.3441 199.3441 5.1300e-
003
199.4724
Total 0.5025 13.0269 5.2676 0.0587 1.2741 0.0257 1.2998 0.3564 0.0245 0.3810 6,372.004 2 6,372.004
2 0.4297 6,382.745
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Paving - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 14 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.1788 1.3100e-
003

0.1802 0.0474 1.2100e-
003

0.0486 148.5467 148.5467 3.4300e-
003
148.6324
Total 0.0610 0.0356 0.4309 1.4900e-
003

0.1788 1.3100e-
003

0.1802 0.0474 1.2100e-
003

0.0486 148.5467 148.5467 3.4300e-
003
148.6324
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.745 2 2,206.745
2 0.7137 2,224.587
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 15 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.1384 1.3100e-
003

0.1397 0.0375 1.2100e-
003

0.0387 148.5467 148.5467 3.4300e-
003
148.6324
Total 0.0610 0.0356 0.4309 1.4900e-
003

0.1384 1.3100e-
003

0.1397 0.0375 1.2100e-
003

0.0387 148.5467 148.5467 3.4300e-
003
148.6324
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 7.2515 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 16 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.6483 4.7600e-
003

0.6531 0.1719 4.3800e-
003

0.1763 538.4818 538.4818 0.0124 538.7924
Total 0.2212 0.1289 1.5620 5.4000e-
003

0.6483 4.7600e-
003

0.6531 0.1719 4.3800e-
003

0.1763 538.4818 538.4818 0.0124 538.7924
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 7.0807 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 7.2515 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e-
003

0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 17 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.5018 4.7600e-
003

0.5065 0.1360 4.3800e-
003

0.1403 538.4818 538.4818 0.0124 538.7924
Total 0.2212 0.1289 1.5620 5.4000e-
003

0.5018 4.7600e-
003

0.5065 0.1360 4.3800e-
003

0.1403 538.4818 538.4818 0.0124 538.7924
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 18 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1469 4.6028 1.5587 0.0158 0.4226 5.6200e-
003

0.4282 0.1217 5.3700e-
003

0.1270 1,694.492
6 1,694.492
6 0.0968 1,696.911 5
Worker 1.2151 0.7672 8.9789 0.0288 3.2192 0.0245 3.2436 0.8537 0.0225 0.8763 2,870.555 3 2,870.555
3 0.0739 2,872.402
1 Total 1.3620 5.3700 10.5376 0.0446 3.6417 0.0301 3.6718 0.9754 0.0279 1.0033 4,565.047 9 4,565.047
9 0.1706 4,569.313
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 19 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.6 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1469 4.6028 1.5587 0.0158 0.3443 5.6200e-
003

0.3499 0.1025 5.3700e-
003

0.1078 1,694.492
6 1,694.492
6 0.0968 1,696.911
5 Worker 1.2151 0.7672 8.9789 0.0288 2.4915 0.0245 2.5160 0.6751 0.0225 0.6977 2,870.555 3 2,870.555
3 0.0739 2,872.402
1 Total 1.3620 5.3700 10.5376 0.0446 2.8358 0.0301 2.8659 0.7776 0.0279 0.8055 4,565.047 9 4,565.047
9 0.1706 4,569.313
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 20 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1433 4.5862 1.5114 0.0158 0.4226 5.5200e-
003

0.4281 0.1217 5.2800e-
003

0.1269 1,687.920
8 1,687.920
8 0.0953 1,690.303
0 Worker 1.1531 0.6995 8.3590 0.0279 3.2192 0.0241 3.2433 0.8537 0.0222 0.8760 2,781.514 9 2,781.514
9 0.0677 2,783.207
1 Total 1.2963 5.2857 9.8704 0.0437 3.6417 0.0297 3.6714 0.9754 0.0275 1.0029 4,469.435 7 4,469.435
7 0.1630 4,473.510
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 21 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1433 4.5862 1.5114 0.0158 0.3443 5.5200e-
003

0.3498 0.1025 5.2800e-
003

0.1077 1,687.920
8 1,687.920
8 0.0953 1,690.303
0 Worker 1.1531 0.6995 8.3590 0.0279 2.4915 0.0241 2.5156 0.6751 0.0222 0.6974 2,781.514 9 2,781.514
9 0.0677 2,783.207
1 Total 1.2963 5.2857 9.8704 0.0437 2.8358 0.0297 2.8655 0.7776 0.0275 0.8051 4,469.435 7 4,469.435
7 0.1630 4,473.510
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Trenching - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Total 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 22 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

3.7 Trenching - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0169 0.0107 0.1247 4.0000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 39.8688 39.8688 1.0300e-
003

39.8945
Total 0.0169 0.0107 0.1247 4.0000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 39.8688 39.8688 1.0300e-
003

39.8945
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 0.0000 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Total 0.3484 3.2493 2.6050 3.3900e-
003

0.2254 0.2254 0.2074 0.2074 0.0000 328.8359 328.8359 0.1064 331.4947 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 23 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

39.8688 39.8688 1.0300e-
003

39.8945
Total 0.0169 0.0107 0.1247 4.0000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

39.8688 39.8688 1.0300e-
003

39.8945
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Total 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 24 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

0.1161 3.9000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 38.6322 38.6322 9.4000e-
004

38.6557
Total 0.0160 9.7200e-
003

0.1161 3.9000e-
004

0.0447 3.4000e-
004

0.0451 0.0119 3.1000e-
004

0.0122 38.6322 38.6322 9.4000e-
004

38.6557
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 0.0000 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Total 0.3417 3.1752 2.6051 3.3900e-
003

0.2197 0.2197 0.2021 0.2021 0.0000 328.7959 328.7959 0.1063 331.4543 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 25 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

0.1161 3.9000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

38.6322 38.6322 9.4000e-
004

38.6557
Total 0.0160 9.7200e-
003

0.1161 3.9000e-
004

0.0346 3.4000e-
004

0.0349 9.3800e-
003

3.1000e-
004

9.6900e-
003

38.6322 38.6322 9.4000e-
004

38.6557
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 26 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 3.6428 16.5964 39.8502 0.1575 14.6209 0.1231 14.7441 3.9117 0.1143 4.0260 16,097.72 58 16,097.72
58 0.7833 16,117.307
3 Unmitigated 3.6428 16.5964 39.8502 0.1575 14.6209 0.1231 14.7441 3.9117 0.1143 4.0260 16,097.72 58 16,097.72
58 0.7833 16,117.307
3 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise 681.17 654.87 599.64 2,275,023 2,275,023 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 392.18 488.46 406.65 556,039 556,039 Regional Shopping Center 438.16 512.76 258.95 915,349 915,349 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru 1,532.49 1,489.68 1070.17 2,644,721 2,644,721 Total 3,044.00 3,145.77 2,335.42 6,391,132 6,391,132
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 27 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 High Turnover (Sit Down
Rt t )

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Th

16.60 8.40 6.90 1.50 79.50 19.00 51 37 12

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Exceed Title 24

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 City Park 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.117175 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Regional Shopping Center 0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.117175 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.00083 4 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive
Thru

0.544210 0.044379 0.208611 0.11717 5 0.014456 0.006301 0.020907 0.032661 0.002589 0.001903 0.005267 0.000705 0.000834 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 28 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1104 0.9627 0.5453 6.0200e-
003

0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 1,203.862
9 1,203.862
9 0.0231 0.0221 1,211.016 9
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1235 1.0764 0.6020 6.7400e-
003

0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 0.0853 1,347.505
7 1,347.505
7 0.0258 0.0247 1,355.513
3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 29 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Mid
Rise
7910.31 0.0853 0.7290 0.3102 4.6500e-
003

9.5700e-
003

9.5700e-
003
151.0632 151.0632 2.9000e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.9609
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
2210.24 0.0238 0.2167 0.1820 1.3000e-
003

0.0165 0.0165 0.0165 0.0165 260.0280 260.0280 4.9800e-
003

4.7700e-
003
261.5733
Regional
Shopping Center

49.218 5.3000e-
004

4.8300e-
003

4.0500e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

5.7904 5.7904 1.1000e-
004

1.1000e-
004

5.8248
Total 0.1235 1.0764 0.6020 6.7400e-
003

0.0854 0.0854 0.0854 0.0854 1,347.505
7 1,347.505
7 0.0258 0.0247 1,355.513
3 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 30 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

6.89494 0.0744 0.6354 0.2704 4.0600e-
003

1.21229 0.0131 0.1189 0.0998 7.1000e-
004

9.0300e-
003

9.0300e-
003
142.6224 142.6224 2.7300e-
003

2.6100e-
003
143.4699
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

2.08674 0.0225 0.2046 0.1719 1.2300e-
003

0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 0.0156 245.4986 245.4986 4.7100e-
003

4.5000e-
003
246.9575
Regional
Shopping Center

0.0388642 4.2000e-
004

3.8100e-
003

3.2000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

4.5723 4.5723 9.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
005

4.5994
Total 0.1104 0.9627 0.5453 6.0200e-
003

0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 0.0762 1,203.862
9 1,203.862
9 0.0231 0.0221 1,211.016
9 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 31 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 6.7604 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Unmitigated 6.7604 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 40.1126 Total 6.7605 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 32 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.5063 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 40.1126 Total 6.7605 0.2501 21.7245 1.1500e-
003

0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.1205 0.0000 39.1707 39.1707 0.0377 0.0000 40.1126 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 33 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

11.0 Vegetation

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/24/2020 1:01 PMPage 34 of 34 E Green St Proposed Unmit - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter

Appendix B
Cultural Resources Technical Report

CCULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT FOR
THE 740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT

PASADENA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:

City of Pasadena Planning and Community Development Department 175 North Garfield Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
Contact: Luis Rocha, Senior Planner
Prepared by:

Sarah Corder, MFA, Nicole Frank, MSHP, Adriane Dorrler, BA, Makayla Murillo, BA, Linda Kry, BA, and Samantha Murray, MA
38 North Marengo Avenue
Pasadena, California 91101
JANUARY 2020
DRAFT
OO
T
RR
T
TT
T
F
T
O
T
DD
T
--
T
UU
T
SS
T
EE
T
P
T
R
T
O
T
J
T
E
T
AA
Tared for:
nn
A
dd
A
CC
A
oo
A
m
A
m
AF
u
AF
n
AF
i
AF
t
AF
yy
AF
D
AF
ee
AF
vv
AF
ee
AF
ll
AF
oo
AF
pp
F
m
F
e
F
n
F
t
F
D
F
75 North Garfield AvenueNorth Garfield A
Pasadena, California 91101na, California 91101
Contact: Luis Rocha, Senior Planner s Rocha, Senior Planner Prepared Prepared
Sarah Corder, MFASarah Corder, MFA,, Nicole Frank, MSHNic Linda Kry, BA, Linda

Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material.

DRAFT
12101
i January 2020
Table of Contents
SSECTION PAGE NO.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... ..................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ ............................................. 3

1.1 Project Location and Description .......................................................................................................... 3

1.2 Project Personnel ................................................................................................................................... 9

1.3 Regulatory Setting .................................................................................................................................. 9 2 BACKGROUND RESEARCH ...................................................... .................................................................... 17

2.1 CHRIS Records Search ........................................................................................................................ 17

2.2 CHRID Records Search ....................................................................................................................... 26

2.3 Native American Coordination ............................................................................................................ 27

2.4 Building Development and Archival Research ................................................................................... 27 3 CULTURAL SETTING ................................. ................................................................................................... 30

3.1 Prehistoric Overview ............................................................................................................................ 30

3.2 Ethnographic Overview........................................................................................................................ 32

3.3 Historic Period Overview ..................................................................................................................... 36

3.4 Project Site History .............................................................................................................................. 41

3.5 Project Site Architectural Styles ......................................................................................................... 44

3.6 Project Site Architects and Designers ................................................................................................ 45 4 FIELD SURVEY ............................................................................................................................................. 50

4.1 Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 50

4.2 Results ................................................................................................................................................. 50 5 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 52

5.1 Building 1 (740-750 East Green Street) ............................................................................................ 52

5.2 Building 2 (770-784 East Green Street) ............................................................................................ 56

5.3 Building 3 (790 East Green Street) .................................................................................................... 60

5.4 Building 4 (111 South Hudson Avenue) ............................................................................................ 65

5.5 Building 5 (118 South Oak Knoll Avenue) ......................................................................................... 69

5.6 Summary of Evaluation Findings ........................................................................................................ 73 6 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 74

6.1 Summary of Findings .......................................................................................................................... 74

6.2 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 74 7 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................................................ 76 DRAFT
..

T
..

T
.

T
................... ...................
............................................ ................... ....................................................................................

F
..

F
.

FT
.

T
..

T
.

TT
............................. ..................................................... .................................... ....................................... ..... ........................................................................ .................... search................................................ ..................... ..

A
..

A
.

AF
.

AF
..

AF
.

F
.

F
...................................................................... ......................... ................................. ................................................ .......... w ...................................... ........................................................ ............................................................................................................ hitectural Styleshitectural Style ....................................... .....

Architects and DesignersArchitects and Des ............................. ..

R
..

R
.

R
..

RA
..

RA
.

RA
..

RA
..A..A
thods...................................................... ....................................

Results .......................................... ...................

D
NN
D
II
D
FF
D
II
D
CC
DDR
AA
D
NN
D
CC
D
EE
D
EE
D
VV
DR
AAAAA
DR
LL
DR
UU
DR
AA
DR
TAT
DR
I
DR
O
DR
N
DR
SS
DR
..

DR
..

R
..

R
.

5.15.1 Building 1 (740(740--750 East Gree750 East Gre

5.25.2 Building 2 (77070--7784 East G84 East G

5.35.3 Building 3 (790 East Gre0 Eas
Building 4 (111 SoutBuilding 4 (111 So
Building 5 (118 SBuilding 5 (118 S
mmary of Emmary of E
CCD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
ii January 2020

AAPPENDICES
A. Confidential Records Search Results
B. DPR forms for 740-750 East Green Street, 770-784 East Green Street, 790 East Green Street, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue
C. Native American Communication
D. Preparer’s Qualifications

FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Location. ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2. Detailed Project Location. ................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 3. 770-784 East Green Street architectural drawing, 1955, Los Angeles Times ........................................... 42 Figure 4. 111 South Hudson Ave architectural drawing, 1951, Los Angeles Times .................................................. 43 Figure 5. Building 1: North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_0362) .............................................................. 53 Figure 6. Building 1: West Elevation, View looking northeast (IMG_0384) ................................................................ 53 Figure 7. Building 1: South Elevation, View looking north (IMG_0414) ...................................................................... 54 Figure 8. Building 2: Left section of North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_0489) ..................................... 57 Figure 9. Building 2: Right section of North Elevation, View looking southeast (IMG_0496) .................................... 57 Figure 10. Building 2: South Elevation, View looking northeast (IMG_0455)............................................................. 58 Figure 11. Building 3: North elevation, View looking south (IMG_0484) .................................................................... 61 Figure 12. Building 3: South elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_0463) ............................................................ 62 Figure 13. Building 3: East Elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_0475) .............................................................. 62 Figure 14. Building 4: East Elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_8528) .............................................................. 65 Figure 15. Building 4: North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_8521) ............................................................ 66 Figure 16. Building 4: West and South Elevations, View looking northeast (IMG_8541) .......................................... 66 Figure 17. Building 4: South Elevation, View looking north (IMG_8534) .................................................................... 67 Figure 18. Building 5: West Elevation, View looking northeast (IMG_8491) .............................................................. 70 Figure 19. Building 5: South and East Elevations, View looking northwest (IMG_8497) .......................................... 70 Figure 20. Building 5: North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_8506) ............................................................ 71 TABLES
Table 1. Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies within 0.5-Mile of the Project Site ................................ 17 Table 2. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within a 0.5-Mile Radius of the Project Site ............................... 19 DRAFT
............................. .......................................... .......... .................... .............................................................. 55, Los Angeles Times55, Los Angeles Tim ................................. 51, Los Angeles Times1, Los Angeles Times............................ hwest (IMG_0362)G_0362) ..................................... .. ortheast (IMG_0384)384) ................................. ng north (IMG_0414)ng north (IM ...................................... evation, View looking southwest (IMG_04on, View looking southwest (IMG_0 rth Elevation, View looking southeast (IMn, View looking southeast (IM on, View looking northeast (IMG_0455), View looking northeast (IMG_0455). ation, View looking south (IMG_0484)ation, View looking south (IM . elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_elevation, View looking northwes st Elevation, View looking northwest (IMGst Elevation, View looking northwest (IM : East Elevation, View looking northwest t Elevation, View looking northwest ng 4: North Elevation, View looking southlevation, View looking south uilding 4: ilding 4: West and South Elevations, VieWest and South Ele

7. Building 4: South Elevation, View looki7. Building 4: South Elevation, View l e 18. Building 5: West Elevation, View looe 18. Building 5: West Elevation, View loo

19. Building 5: S19. Bui outh and East Elevd Ea
Building 5: North ElevationBuilding 5: North Elevati
dudu

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
1 January 2020
Executive Summary
Dudek was retained by the City of Pasadena to complete a cultural resources technical report for the 740-790 East Green Street Mixed-Use Project (Project) in the City of Pa sadena, California. This report includes the results of a pedestrian survey of the Project site by a qualified ar chitectural historian; a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search; coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and tribal contacts; building development and archival research, development of an appropriate historic context for the Project site; and recordation and evaluation of five commercial properties over 45 years old for historical significance and integrity in consideration of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and City of Pasadena designation criteria and integrity requirements. This report was prepared in conformance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064.5 for historical resources and all applicable local guidelines and regulations.

Dudek conducted a CHRIS records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) on August 16, 2019. No cultural resources were identified within the Project site as a result. The records search identified 18 previously conducted cultural resources technical invest igations within the records search area. Two of these studies are adjacent to the Project site. Neither study identified impacts to cultural resources within the vicinity of the Project site. Additionally, the SCCIC records indicate that 52 previously recorded cultural resources exist within the surrounding 0.5-mile search radius. All 52 resources identified consist of built environment resources, none of which intersect or are adjacent to the Project site. No previously recorded prehistoric or historic-era archaeological resources were identified within 0.5-mile of the Project site as a result of the records search.

Dudek contacted the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on August 13, 2019 to request a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF). Results of the SLF (received September 13, 2019) were positive. The NAHC recommended contacting the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation for specific information regarding the positive findings. The NAHC also suggested contacting an additional six Native American individuals and/or tribal organizations who may have direct knowledge of cultural resources in or near the Project site. Details of the SLF request and results are presented in Section 2.3 and provided in Appendix C. The proposed Project is subject to compliance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52. Native American consultation pursuant to AB 52 between the City and NAHC-listed traditionally geographically affiliated tribal representatives that have requested project notification is on-going.

The five commercial properties located at 740-750 East Green Street, 770-784 East Green Street, 790 East Green Street, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue do not appear eligible under any NRHP, CRHR, or City of Pasadena designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit.

Therefore, these properties are not historical resource for the purposes of CEQA.

As a result of Dudek’s extensive archival research, field survey, tribal coordination, and property significance evaluations, no historical or tribal cultural resources were identified within the Project site. Nor were any adjacent resources identified that could be indirectly impacted by proposed project activities. Therefore, the Project would result in a less than significant impact to historical resources under CEQA. t inclt incl
lifornia Hislifornia
an Heritage Comman Her
of an appropriate hof an approp istori
ertieserties over 45 years old r 45 ye for
oric Places (NRHP), California Registoric Places (NRHP), Cali ia and integrityia and requirementsments. . This reporT (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064.5 for h(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064.5 f Central Coastal Information Center (SCCl Coastal Informa he Project site as a result. te as a res The records
l investigationl in s within the records seathin the
r study identified impacts to cultural resostudy identified impacts to cultu rds indicate that dicate that 52 previously recorded52 previously recorde All 52 resources identified consist of urces identified consist buiui Project site. No previously recorded preo previously recorded pre 55--mile of the Project site mile of the Project site as a result of thas a nia Native American Heritage Commissnia Native American Heritage Co ds ds FFile (SLF)ile . Resusults of the SLF (receivelts of the SLF (rece ting the g the Gabrieleno Band of Mission IndiGabrieleno Band of Mission Indi gs. The NAHC also suggested contactingNAHC also suggested contacting ons who may have direct knowledge of cns who may have direc and rand results are presented in Section esults are presented in 2.3 ance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52. ance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52. Native N listed traditionally geographically affiliatlisted traditionally geographically affiliat ing.ing.
mmercial mmerci properties locates loca
uth Hudson Avenueuth Hudson Avenue
na designationa designatio
perties perties

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
2 January 2020

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BINTENTIONALLY LE LANK

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
3 January 2020
1 Introduction
Dudek was retained by the City of Pasadena to complete a cultural resources technical report for the 740-790 East Green Street Mixed-Use Project (Project) in the City of Pa sadena, California. This report includes the results of a pedestrian survey of the Project site by a qualified ar chitectural historian; a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search; coordination with the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and tribal contacts; building development and archival research, development of an appropriate historic context for the Project site; and recordation and evaluation of five commercial properties over 45 years old for historical significance and integrity in consideration of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), and City of Pasadena designation criteria and integrity requirements. This report was prepared in conformance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15064.5 for historical resources.

1.1 Project Location and Description
PProject Location
The Project site is located within the City of Pasadena, Ca lifornia and is bound by East Green Street to the north, South Hudson Avenue to the east, South Oak Knoll Avenue to the west, and other commercial buildings to the south with the block terminating at Cordova Street (Figure 1). Specifically, the Project site includes the following five addresses and associated Assessor’s Identification Numbers (AINs) (Figure 2):

1. 740-750 E. Green Street (AIN: 5743-025-024)

2. 770-784 East Green Street (AIN: 5743-025-014)

3. 790 East Green Street (AIN: 5743-025-026)

4. 111 South Hudson Avenue (AIN: 5743-025-029

5. 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue (AIN: 5743-025-027)
Project Description
The proposed Project involves the demolition of five commercial buildings in order to accommodate the development of a new 3- to 6-story, mixed-use building. The proposed Project includes 273 for-rent units (including 23 units designated for Very Low-Income households), 18,392 square feet (sf) of commercial use (e.g., retail, restaurant), a two-level subterranean parking garage with 492 parking spaces, and a 6,694-sf publicly accessible pocket park. Access to the parking garage would be from Oak Knoll Avenue and Hudson Avenue, via a private driveway on each street frontage. In addition to the proposed pocket park, open space areas include ground-level courtyards, pool courtyards, indoor recreational space, rooftop terraces, and private decks/patios.

Adjacent land uses include single- and multi-family residential and commercial to the west across Oak Knoll Avenue; commercial and parking to the north across Green Street; multi-family residential and parking to the east across DRAFT
t inclt incl
lifornia Hislifornia
e American Heritage Amer
elopment of an approprelopment of
ercial properties over 45 yearercial properties o
ster of Historic Places (NRHP), Califster of Historic Places ( nation criteria and integritynation criteria and integrity requirementsrequ al Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 1al Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sectio d Descriptioncription
of Pasadena, California and is dena, California and is bound bynd by h Oak Knoll Avenue to the west, and otheAvenue to the west, and oth ova Streetva Str (Figure 1)e 1). . Specifically, the PSpecifically, the P sor’s Identification Numbers (sor’s Identification Numbers AINs) (Figu een Street (AIN: 5743een Street (AIN: 574 -025-024)4)
4 East Green Street (t Green Street (AIN: 5743AIN: 5743--025025--014014 0 East Green Street (AIN: 57430 East Green Street (AIN -025-026 .. 111 South Hudson Avenue (AIN: 574111 South Hudson Avenue (AIN:

5.5. 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue (A118 South Oak Knoll Av cc
D
rr
D
ii
D
pp
D
tt
D
ii
D
oo
D
nn
D
roject involveroject involve
w 3w 3-- to 6to 6
rr

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
4 January 2020
Hudson Avenue; and offices and a church immediately to the south, with multi-family and office uses beyond. The Project site is located within the CD-4 (Central District, Pasadena Playhouse) zoning district. The nearest light rail stations are the Lake Metro Gold Line Station located at the Interstate (I) 210 approximately 0.5-mile to the north, and the Del Mar Metro Gold Line Station located approximately 0.8-mile to the west near Central Park.

The proposed Project would establish a Planned Development (PD) zoning district (via a Zone Change) for the site and requires adoption of a PD Plan that prescribes the development standards and allowed or conditionally allowed uses in the PD. The Project proposes to use the State Density Bonus to develop 273 units, which would be allowed after applying a 35 percent density bonus based on the inclusion of 23 very low-income units. The Applicant is also requesting a building height of up to 82 feet at South Hudson Avenue, which requires approval of an Affordable Housing Concession Permit. The project would also require Design Review approval.

DRAFT
ZonZon
owed or coowed o
3 units, which w3 units
income units. Theincome u App
ch requires approval of an Ach requires app
w approval.w appro
S Lake Ave
el Molino Ave
S Madison Ave
N
LosRoblesAve
rew Aly
N Lake Ave
E California Blvd
N Marengo Ave
ke Aly
E Union St
N Wilson Ave
Cornell Rd
S Marengo Ave
Cordova St
Foothill FwyI- 210
Lombardy Rd
E Colorado Blvd
E Walnut St
Pearl Pl
S el Molino Ave
E Villa St
W Maple St
atandSfRlwy
stnut St
Parke St
N Michigan Ave
S Euclid Ave
E del Mar Blvd
N Chester AveN Holliston Ave
Metcalf Aly
Arcade Aly
S Hudson Ave
N Mentor Ave
Evanston Pl
Cottage Pl
Oak KnollGardensDr
E Green St
San Pasqual St
Lura St
S Mentor Ave
S Los Robles Ave
N Hudson Ave
Gibbs Aly
Ty le r Aly
Parker Aly
Clark Aly
Towns end Pl
Fillmore St
S Chester Ave
S Oakland Ave
Corson St
S Holliston Ave
Weight Aly
Rhodes Aly
S Oak Knoll Ave
Boston CtN Garfield Ave
S Wilson Ave
S Michigan Ave
Bartlett Aly
Granite Dr
N Catalina Ave
Converse Aly Giddings Aly
Langford Aly
E Corson St
NindePl
Morgan Aly
E Holly St
E Bellevue Dr
Emerson St
N Euclid Ave
Ramona St
Yolo St
Pico St
el Dorado St
Locust St
Dale St
Market Aly
Playhouse Aly
Ford Pl
Oakwood Pl
Palm View Pl
Magnolia Ave
S Catalina Ave
Miles St
N Madison Ave
N el Molino Ave
Mira Monte Pl
LakewoodPl
Shoppers Ln
Steuben St
Blanche St
Holladay
Rd
N Oak Knoll Ave
N Oakland Ave
Maple Way
Newton Aly
Pleasant St
Earlham St
Santa Barbara St
Project Location
740-790 East Green Street Mixed-Use Project
SOURCE: ESRI 2018
Date: 9/16/2019 - Last saved by: bdokkestul - Path: Z:\Projects\j1210100\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Cultural\Figure1_ProjectLocation.m xd 01 ,000500
Feet
FIGURE 1
1:12,000
0 280140
Meters
IrvineSanta Ana
Seal
Beach
Anaheim
Lakewood Corona
Long
Beach
Torrance
El Segundo
Norco
PomonaPico
Rivera Eastvale
Malibu
West Hollywood Alhambra
Upland
Irwindale San Dimas
Agoura
Hills
Glendora
Fontana
Pasadena
Glendale
San
Fernando
Hesperia
Hesperia
Santa Clarita
Victorville
Adelanto
Adelanto
Palmdale
Lancaster
Rialto
Palos
Verdes
Estates
Burbank
Jurupa
Valley
Santa
Monica
Thousand
Oaks
Moorpark
Fillmore
Simi Valley
Los
Angeles
Kern County
Ventura
County
101
39548
71 57
118
134
91 103
138
39 159
23 187
126
170
34 1
213 22
72 90
55 18
83 241
27 66
19 60
13814
2 10
405
5 210
5 710 605
10 105
15 LOS

ANGELES
COUNTY
Project Site
Project Site

RADDDDDDDDDDRDRDR

FFFFFFFFF
E
UUnii
oooon

TTTTTTTTTTTT
son Avelsooon
AvAAvevee

RARARARARARARARAA
rdova Srdrdoddov
voovava a S

AAAAAAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAF

RRRRRRRRR
ooolii

TTTTTTTT
N MicN Micicc

DDDDDDDDDDD
SS
RRRRR
E
dddeeel M
TTTTT
AAAAA
rcade Al
Ar
rrccaaadedde e
AlyAAAlyly

FTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFT
A
AveAvAAvevee

DDDDDDDDDDDDD
veAv
vvevee
AAAAAA
DDD
AlyAAlyly

DDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRDR
O
Oa
kland A
S OaOOaaakklalaaan
d dA
A

FTFTFTFTFTFT

FFFFFFFTFT
CCt

FTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFTFT

DDDDDDDDDD
Bellevue BeBBBeelllleleve
vevvueue e
D

FTFTFTFTTT
tSSt

AFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAFAF
a
rrr
kkkeeeet
A
A
A
AAAAll
yyy

DRDRDRDRDRDRDRDRRRRRR
PPPaalm
VVVViiieee
www

RARARARARARARARARARARARARA
PPPPl
AA
D
AFAF
Pro

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
6 January 2020

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BINTENTIONALLY LE LANK
Detailed Project Location
740-790 East Green Street Mixed-Use Project
SOURCE: ESRI 2018
Date: 1/13/2020 - Last saved by: bdokkestul - Path: Z:\Projects\j1210100\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\Cultural\Figure2_DetailedProjectLo cation.mxd 0 10050
Feet
Project Boundary
1 - 740-750 East Green Street, Pasadena,
CA 91101 (APN: 5743-025-024)
2 - 770-784 East Green Street, Pasadena,
CA 91101 (APN: 5743-025-014)
3 - 790 East Green Street, Pasadena, CA
91101 (APN: 5743-025-026)
4 - 111 South Hudson Avenue, Pasadena,
CA 91101 (APN: 5743-025-029)
5 - 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue, Pasadena,
CA 91101 (APN: 5743-025-027)
FIGURE 2
1:1,200
02 512.5
Meters
D
Bounda
0 East Green Street,
PN: 5743-025-024
Green St
43-0
D

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
8 January 2020

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BINTENTIONALLY LE LANK

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
9 January 2020

1.2 Project Personnel
This report and associated property significance evaluations was prepared by Dudek Architectural Historians Sarah Corder, MFA and Nicole Frank, MSHP. Dudek Archaeologist Adriane Dorrler, BA, completed the CHRIS records search, the NAHC Sacred Lands File (SLF) request, and coordinated Native American outreach. Dudek Archaeologist Makayla Murillo, BA, contributed to the report. This report was reviewed by for quality assurance/quality control by Dudek Principal Architectural Historian Samantha Murr ay, MA and Dudek Lead Archaeologist Linda Kry, BA.

Resumes for all key personnel are provided in Appendix D.

1.3 Regulatory Setting
FFederal
National Register of Historic Places
While there is no federal nexus for this project, the su bject property was evaluated in consideration of NRHP designation criteria. The NRHP is the United States’ official list of districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects worthy of preservation. Overseen by the National Park Service, under the U.S. Department of the Interior, the NRHP was authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended. Its listings encompass all National Historic Landmarks, as well as historic areas administered by the National Park Service.

NRHP guidelines for the evaluation of historic significance were developed to be flexible and to recognize the accomplishments of all who have made significant contributions to the nation’s history and heritage. Its criteria are designed to guide state and local governments, federal agencies, and others in evaluating potential entries in the NRHP. For a property to be listed in or determined eligible for listing, it must be demonstrated to possess integrity and to meet at least one of the following criteria:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and:

A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B. That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Integrity is defined in NRHP guidance, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria,” as “the ability of a property to convey its significance. To be listed in the NRHP, a property must not only be shown to be significant under the NRHP criteria, but it also must have integrity” (NPS 1 990). NRHP guidance further asserts that properties be DRAFT
achach
assurancassuran
d Archaeologistd Archa
e subject property was evaluated in coperty was
s’ official list of districts, s’ official list of districts, sites, buildingssit al Park Service, under the U.S. DepartmePark Service, under the U.S. De c Preservation Act, as amended. Its lisservation Act, as amended. Its l reas administered by the National Park Snistered by the National Park S on of historic significance were developn of historic significance we ve made significave made signific nt contributions to the nribut local governments, federal agencies, anlocal governments, federal agenc be listed in or determined eligible for listbe listed in or determined eligible for l ne of the following criteria:of the following criteria:
ignificance in American history, architecnificance in American es, buildings, structures,es, buildings, structures, and objects than ship, feeling, and association, and:ship, feeling, and association, and:

That are associated with eventsed with events
history; orhis
hat are assochat are iated wiated w
mbody thmbody th
thethe

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
10 January 2020
completed at least 50 years ago to be considered for elig ibility. Properties completed fewer than 50 years before evaluation must be proven to be “exceptionally important” (criteria consideration to be considered for listing.

SState
California Register of Historical Resources
In California, the term “historical resource” includes but is not limited to “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California” (California Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(j)). In 1992, the California legislature established the CRHR “to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state’s historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change” (California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(a)). The criteria for listing resources on the CRHR were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the NRHP, enumerated below. According to California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered historically significant if it (i) retains “substantial integrity,” and (ii) meets at least one of the following criteria:
(1) Is associated with events that have made a signific ant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage.
(2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. (4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

In order to understand the historic importance of a resource, sufficient time must have passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than 50 years old may be considered for listing in the CRHR if it can be demonstr ated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance (see 14 CCR 4852(d)(2)).

The CRHR protects cultural resources by requiring evaluations of the significance of prehistoric and historic resources. The criteria for the CRHR are nearly identical to those for the NRHP, and properties listed or formally designated as eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR, as are the state landmarks and points of interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local historical resource surveys.

California Environmental Quality Act
As described further below, the following CEQA statutes and CEQA Guidelines are of relevance to the analysis of archaeological, historic, and tribal cultural resources:
x California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resource.” DRAFT
t, building, strut, buildi
r is significanr is signi t in the
ilitary, or cultural annals of ilitary, or cultur
nia legislature established the Ca legislature establ R entify the state’s historical resources anentify the state’s historical r and feasible, from substantial adverse chand feasible, from substantial adv a for listing resources on the CRHR werea for listing resources on the CRHR wer riteria developed for listing in the NRHP,riteria developed for listing in the NRHP, ion 5024.1(c)(15024.1 –4), a resource is consid4), a r
meets at least one of the following criteeast one of t
made a significant contribution tmade a significant contribution o the broa of persons important in our past.mportant in our past.
ctive characteristics of a type, period, ctive characteristics of a ty rkrk of an important creative individual, or of an important creative ind or may be likely to yield, information impor may be likely to yield, information im and the historic importance of a resourcehistoric importance of a resource the events or individuals associated wite events or individua or listing in the CRHR if it can be demor listing in the CRHR if it c importance (see 14 CCR 4852(d)(2)).importance (see 14 CCR 4852(d)(2 CRHR protects cultural resources by CRHR protects cultural resources by es. The criteria for the CRHR arees. The criteria for the CRH as eligible for listing in theas eligible for listing in t est. The CRHR also iest. The CRHR also
e surveys.e surveys.
llD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
11 January 2020
x California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) define “historical resources.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource.” It also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the significance of an historical resource. x California Public Resources Code Section 21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources.” x California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) set forth standards and steps to be employed following th e accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated ceremony.
x California Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b)-(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 provide information regarding the mitigation framework for archaeological and historic resources, including examples of preservation-in-place mitigation measures; preservation-in-place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the archaeological context and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups associated with the archaeological site(s).

More specifically, under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b).) If a site is either listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or if it is included in a local register of historic resources or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of California Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(q)), it is a “historical resource” and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource even if it does not fall within this presumption (California Public Resources Code Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)).

A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(1); California Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(q)). In turn, CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(b)(2) states the significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project:

1. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources; or

2. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or its identification in an histor ical resources survey meeting the requirements of section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or
DRAFT
soso
es Section 150es Sect
scovery of human remscovery o
c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 151c) and CEQA Guidelines S ork for archaeological and historic resoork for archaeological and histor on measures; preservon meas ation-in-place is thece is th aeological sites because it maintains theaeological sites because it maintains the ntext and may also help avoid conflict wt and may also he he archaeological site(s).ological site(s
ave a significant effect on the environave a significant effect on t e of an historical resource” (California Puan historical resource” (Californi .5(b).) If a site is either listed or eligible f a site is either listed or eligible sources or identified as significant in a hdentified as significant in a lic Resources Code Section 5024.1(q)c Resources Code Section 5024.1(q) turally significant for purposes of CEQA (turally significant for purpose ction 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is notction 15064.5(a)). The lead age en if it does not fall within this presumpen if it does not fall within this pres nes Section 15064.5(a)).es Section 15064.5(a)).
verse change in the significance of an ge in the significance of an “physical demolition, destruction, relo“physical demolition, d gs such that the significance ogs such that the significance o f an histof 15064.5(b)(1); California Public Resou15064.5(b)(1); California Public Res

64.5(b)(2) states the significance of an h64.5(b)(2) states the significance of an h Demolishes or materially aDemolishes or materia
resource that convey itsresource that convey it
he Calhe California Regifornia Reg
es ores or

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
12 January 2020

3. Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse ma nner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA.

Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any “historical resources,” then evaluates whether that project will caus e a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource such that the resource’s historical significance is materially impaired.

If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or al l of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2[a], [b], and [c]).

California Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria:

1. Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information.

2. Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type.

3. Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person.

Impacts to non-unique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental impact (California Public Resources Code section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(c)(4)). However, if a non- unique archaeological resource qualifies as tribal cultural resource (California Public Resources Code Section 21074(c), 21083.2(h)), further consideration of significant impacts is required. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 assigns special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As described below, these procedures are detailed in California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

L
Local
City of Pasadena Historic Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 17.62) This study was completed in consideration of all sections of the Pasadena Historic Preservation Ordinance (Chapter

17.62). Sections most relevant to this study are provided below.

17.62.010 - Purpose of Chapter
The purpose of this Chapter is to specify significance criteria for the designation of historic resources, procedures for designation, and review procedures to:

A. Encourage and promote the adaptive reuse of the City's historic resources; ge ine in
ed.ed.
ologicaological resource, thel r
ces to be preserved in placeces to be prese
rbed, mitigation measures are rerbed, mitigation meas
nes a unique archaeological resourcnes a unique archaeological resour early demonstrated that withoearly demonstrated th ut merely it meets any of the following criteria:eets any of the follo r important scientific research questionentific r
nformation.nforma
uality such as being the oldest of its typeuch as being the oldest of its typ with a scientifically recognized importanwith a scientifically recognize aeological resources are generally not caeological resources are generall ces Code section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidces Code section 21083.2(a); CEQA Gu l resource qualifiesesource qualifies as tribal cultural ras tribal cultural r 2(h)), further consideration of significanther consideration of significant importance to human remains and specmportance to human r red. As described below, these procedured. As described below, thes dd
D
ee
D
nn
D
aa
D
HH
D
i
D
sisis
D
t
D
o
D
r
D
ii
D
c
D
P
D
rr
D
ee
D
s
D
ee
D
rr
D
vv
D
aavvaavvaaa
D
tt
D
i
D
o
D
mpleted in cmpleted in conon
st relevast releva

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
13 January 2020
B. Enhance, perpetuate, and preserve architecturally and historically significant structures and promote revitalization of historic neighborhoods and commercial areas; C. Ensure that the rights of the owners of historic re sources and owners of properties adjacent to historic resources are safeguarded;
D. Foster civic pride in the beauty and noble accomplishments of the past by promoting private stewardship of historic resources that represent these accomplishments; E. Fulfill the City's responsibilities:

1. As a Certified Local Government under Federal preservation laws; and

2. For Federal Section 106 reviews and for the Califo rnia Environmental Quality Act regarding historic resources.

F. Promote the identification, documentation, and eval uation of the significance of individual historic resources and districts;
G. Implement the historic preservation goals, policies, and programs of the General Plan; H. Promote the City as a destination for tourists and as a desirable location for business; I. Promote public awareness of the value of rehabilitation, restoration, and maintenance of the existing building stock as a means to conserve reusable material and energy resources; J. Recognize the City's historic resources as economic assets; and K. Stabilize and improve property values, and enhance the aesthetic and visual character and environmental amenities of the City's historic properties and areas.

17.62.040 - Criteria for Designation of Historic Resources A. Evaluation of Historic Resources.

When considering applications to designate a historic monument, landmark, historic sign, landmark tree or landmark district, the Historic Preservation Commission shall apply the criteria below according to applicable National Register of Historic Places Bulletins for evalua ting historic properties, including the seven aspects of integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association (National Register of Historic Places Bulletin #15: "How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation").

B. Historic monuments.

1. A historic monument shall include all historic reso urces previously designated as historic treasures before adoption of this Chapter, historic resources that are listed in the National Register at the State- wide or Federal level of significance (including National Historic Landmarks) and any historic resource that is significant at a regional, State, or Federal level, and is an exemplary representation of a particular type of historic resource and meets one or more of the following criteria:

DRAFT
past by past b
ts;ts;
ation laws; andation la
ornia Environmental Quality Act regardinornia Environmental Quality Act regard and evaluation of the svaluation of the ignificance of
n goals, policies, and programs of the Gegoals, policies, and programs of ation for tourists and as a desirable locatourists and as a desirable locat ess of the value of rehabilitation, restoress of the value of rehabilitation, restor means to conserve reusable material anmeans to conserve reusable City's historic resources as economic as City's historic resources as econom and improve property values, and improve property values, and onmental amenities of the City's historicmenities of the City's historic Criteria for Designation of Historic ResoCriteria for Designation of Hist DR
aluation of Historic Resources.aluation of Historic Resources DR
nsidensidering applications to desring applications to
strict, the Historic Presstrict, the Historic Pre
ter of Historic Plater of Historic Pla
design, settdesign, sett
How tHow t

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
14 January 2020
a. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the region, State, or nation.
b. It is associated with the lives of persons who are significant in the history of the region, State, or nation.
c. It is exceptional in the embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of a historic resource property type, period, architectural style, or method of construction, or that is an exceptional representation of the work of an architect, designer, engineer, or builder whose work is significant to the region, State, or nation, or that possesses high artistic va lues that are of regional, State-wide or national significance.
d. It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history of the region, State, or nation.

2. A historic monument designation may include significant public or semi-public interior spaces and features.

C. Landmarks.

1. A landmark shall include all properties previously designated a landmark before adoption of this Chapter and any historic resource that is of a local level of significance and meets one or more of the criteria listed in Subparagraph 2., below.

2. A landmark may be the best representation in the City of a type of historic resource or it may be one of several historic resources in the City that have common architectural attributes that represent a particular type of historic resource. A landmark shall meet one or more of the following criteria:
a. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of the history of the City, region, or State.
b. It is associated with the lives of persons who are significant in the history of the City, region, or State.
c. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, architectural style, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of an architect, designer, engineer, or builder whose work is of significance to the City or, to the region or possesses artistic values of significance to the City or to the region.
d. It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important locally in prehistory or history.

D. Historic signs.

1. A historic sign shall include all signs in the sign inve ntory as of the date of adoption of this Zoning Code and any sign subsequently designated historically significant by the Historic Preservation Commission that possesses high artistic values. A historic sign shall meet one or more or the following criteria:

DRAFT
f a historifa h i s t o
s an exceptionas an ex
se work is significant te work is
are of regional, Stateare of regional, -wide o
important in prehistory or history of the important in prehistory or history ficant public or semiant public or semi--public interior spacepu s previously designated a landmark befopreviously designated a landmar cal level of significance and meets one vel of significance and meets one est representation in the City of a type est representation in the City n the City that have common architecturan the City that have common ndmark shall meet onendmark shall meet or more of the foore o ssociated with events that have made a ociated with events that have made a story of the City, region, or State. he City, region, or State.

It is associated with the lives of persIt is associated with the State. S
c.c. It embodies the distinctivethe distinctive
construction, or represenr rep
of significance to tof significance to the h
to the region. to the region.
as yieldedas yielded

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
15 January 2020
a. The sign is exemplary of technology, craftsmanship or design of the period when it was constructed, uses historic sign materials and means of illumination, and is not significantly altered from its historic period. Historic sign materials shall include metal or wood facings, or paint directly on the façade of a building. Historic means of illumination shall include incandescent light fixtures or neon tubing on the exterior of the sign. If the sign has been altered, it must be restorable to its historic function and appearance.
b. The sign is integrated with the architecture of the building. c. A sign not meeting criteria a or b above may be considered for inclusion in the inventory if it demonstrates extraordinary aesthetic quality, creativity, or innovation.

2. All other regulations relating to signs shall comply with Chapter 17.48 (Signs).

E. Landmark trees.

A tree shall qualify to be of historic or cultural significance and of importance to the community if it meets any one of the following criteria:

1. It is one of the largest or oldest trees of the species located in the City;

2. It has historical significance due to an association with a historic event, person, site, street, or structure; or

3. It is a defining landmark or significant outstanding feature of a neighborhood.

F. Landmark districts.

1. A landmark district shall include all landmark dist ricts previously designated before adoption of this Chapter and any grouping of contiguous properties that also meet the following criteria:
a. Within its boundaries, a minimum of 60 percent of the properties qualify as contributing; and b. The grouping represents a significant and distinguishable entity of Citywide importance and one or more of a defined historic, cultural, development and/or architectural context(s) (e.g., 1991 Citywide historic context, as amended, historic context prepared in an intensive-level survey or historic context prepared specifically for the nominated landmark district).

2. When determining the boundaries of a landmark district, the Historic Preservation Commission shall use the National Register of Historic Places Bulletin #21: "Defining Boundaries for National Register Properties".

DRAFT
ed for inclusion in the inveed for inclusion
or innovation.or innov
pter 17.48 (Signs).pter 17
ce and of importance to the community of importance to
f the species located in the City;the species located in the City; to an association with a historic event, pociation with a historic event, p r significant outstanding feature of a neigsignificant outstanding featu k district shall include all landmark distdistrict shall include all landmark dist r and any grouping of contiguous propertny grouping of contiguous propert Within its boundaries, a minimum of 6Within its boundaries, a b.b. The grouping represents a signifing represents a sig more of a defined historic,efined historic,
Citywide historic context,ic co
historic context preparhistoric context pre
When determiniWhen determini
all use theall use the
ter Pter P

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
16 January 2020

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BINTENTIONALLY LE LANK

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
17 January 2020
2 Background Research

2.1 CHRIS Records Search
On August 16, 2019, Dudek completed a CHRIS records search of the Project site and a 0.5-mile search radius at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), located on the campus of California State University, Fullerton. This search included mapped prehistoric, hist orical, and built-environment resources; Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) site records; technical reports; archival resources; and ethnographic references. The confidential records search results are also provide in Confidential Appendix A.

PPreviously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies
Results of the cultural resources records search indicated that 18 previous cultural resource studies have been conducted within 0.5-mile of the Project site between 1993 and 2013. While no previous studies have been conducted within the Project site, two studies (LA-04909 and LA-08816) are adjacent to the Project’s northern boundary. Table 1, below, summarizes all 18 previous cultural resources studies followed by a brief summary of the two studies that are adjacent to the Project site.

Table 1. Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies Within a 0..5-MMile Radius oof the Project Site
SCCIC
Report
Number
Authors Year Title Proximity to
Project Site
LA-03497 Tetra Tech, Inc. 1994 Draft Supplemental Enviro nmental Impact Report Pasadena-Los Angeles Light Rail Transit Project Outside LA-03498 Tetra Tech, Inc. 1994 Final Supplemental Environm ental Impact Report Pasadena-Los Angeles Light Rail Transit Project Outside LA-04386 Caltrans 1993
Cultural Resources Overview Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority's Interstate
Commerce Commission Abandonment Exemption
Pasadena-Los Angeles Light Rail Transit Project
Outside
LA-04909 Atchley, Sara M. 2000
Cultural Resources Investigation for the Nextlink Fiber Optic Project, Los Angeles and Orange Counties,
California
Adjacent
LA-05635 Duke, Curt 2001 Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular Wireless Facility No. VY 106-01 Los Angeles County, California Outside
LA-06961 Duke, Curt and
Judith Marvin 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment AT&T Wireless Services Facility No. D493C Los Angeles County, California Outside LA-07459 Metzer, Valerie A. 2006 FCC 060420b 336 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California 91101 Outside
LA-08813
Bonner, Wayne H.
and Kathleen A.

Crawford
2007
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit
Results for T-mobile Candidate LE04861E (Nouri Rugs),
634 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, Los Angeles
County, California
Outside
D
Curt anCurt an
vinvin
DRAFT
and and a a 0.5-mile
pus of California Statpus of Ca
nvironment resources; Depanvironment reso
ources; and ethnographic referenceources; and ethnograph pendix A.pendix
d that at 1188 previous cultural resource stuprevious cult n 1993 and 2013. nd 2013. While no previous W
04909 and LA -08816)08816) are adjacent to
evious cultural resources studies followevious cultural resources stud ct site.ite.

R
l
R
t
RA
u
RA
r
RA
a
RA
l
RA
R
RA
e
RA
s
RA
oo
RA
uu
RA
rr
RA
cc
RA
e
RA
s
RA
S
RA
t
A
uu
A
dd
A
ii
A
ee
A
ss
A
WW
A
ii
A
tt
A
hh
A
ii
A
nn
A
aa
A
0 P
RA
r
RA
o
RA
joj
RA
e
RA
cc
RA
tt
RA
SS
RA
i
RA
t
RA
ee

RARARRRR
YYe

RARARRRARR
h, Inc.c 1994 Draft Supplemental EnDraft Supplemental En PasadenaPasadena--Los AngelesLos Angeles

RRRRRADRR
a Tech, Inc. 19941994 Final Supplementamenta
Pasadena-Los A

DRDRDRRRDRR
8686 CaltransCa 1993
Cultural Res
MetropolitaMet
CommeComm
PasPas

DRDRDRRRDDRRDD
9 DD
AAtch
DD
200

DDDDDDD
ke, Curtke, Curt
DDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
18 January 2020
TTable 1. Previously Conducted Cultural Resourcess SStudies WWithin a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the PProject Site
SCCIC
Report
Number
Authors Year Title Proximity to
Project Site
LA-08816 Padon, Beth 2007
Archaeological Survey Report Playhouse District
Streetscapes, Walkways and Alleys Project, Pasadena
Playhouse Historic District, City of Pasadena, Los
Angeles County, California (Local Assistance Project,
District 07 Los Angeles, EA 07-4U3734)
Adjacent
LA-09050 Thai, Sean and
Lorna Billat 2005 Los Robles / CA-7103J Outside
LA-09681 Supernowicz, Dana
E. 2007
Cultural Resources Study of the Charles Company
Pasadena Project, Royal Street Communications Site No.

LA2367B, 532 E. Colorado Boulevard , Pasadena, Los
Angeles County, California 91101
Outside
LA-10845 Judd, Bruce 2002 Photographs Partial Plan Drawings Outside LA-10991 Grimes, T. 2001 East Colorado Boulevard, Specific Plan, Historic Resources Survey Outside
LA-11420 McKenna, Jeanette
A. 2011
A Cultural Resources Assessment and Evaluation of
Potential Impacts to the William McKinley Elementary
School in the City of Pasadena, Los Angeles County,
California
Outside
LA-11534 Supernowicz, Dana 2010
Cultural Resources Study of the Scottish Rite Project
AT&T Site No. LAD493, 150 North Madison Avenue
Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California 91101
Outside
LA-11725 Puckett, Heathe 2012 E. Walnut, 532 E. Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91101 Outside
LA-12196
Bonner, Wayne,
Sarah Williams, and
Kathleen Crawford
2012
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for T-Mobile West, LLC Candidate IE04861E (IE861 Nouri
Rugs), 634 East Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, Los
Angeles County, California
Outside
LA-12613 Perez, Don 2013 Los Robles/Ensite #13890 (120735), 80 South Lake Avenue, Pasadena, Los Angeles County, CA 91101
Outside
LLA-04909
Nextlink retained Jones & Stokes to conduct a cultural resources study in support of the Nextlink Fiber Optic Project.

The project consisted of the installation of miles of buri ed fiber optic cable throughout residential and business districts in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. The project alignment was discontiguous and occurred entirely within asphalt-paved roadways. A section of the alignment traversed Green Street in the City of Pasadena, adjacent to the northern boundary of the current Project site. The study identified four NRHP listed properties adjacent to the project alignment, none of which was in the vicinity of the current Project site. No additional cultural resources were identified within the project alignment as a result of the records search, NAHC SLF search, and windshield survey.

Management recommendations consisted of the standard measures for the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources and human remains.

DRAFT
TTT
a
TT
roject,
TTTT
Outside
TTTFTT
he Charleshe Char Company
Communications Site No. Commu
BoulevardBoulev , Pasadena, Los
ia 91101ia 91101
OutsideOutside

FTFTFTTFTT
Plan DrawingsDrawings Out

FTFTFTFT
Boulevard, Specific Plan,cific Plan, Historic His
Survey
AFFFF
al Resources Assessment andal Resources Assessment and Evaluation of Ev tial Impacts to the Impacts to the William McKinley Elementinley Ele hool in the City ofthe City of Pasadena, Los Angeles CPasadena, Los Angeles C California
AF
00 Cultural Resources Study of the Scottish ources Study of the Scottish AT&T Site AT No. LAD493, 150 Northo. LAD493, MM
Pasadena, Los AngelesPasadena, Los Angeles County, Califo RAR
2012201 E. Walnut, 532 E. Colorado BoulevE. Walnut, 532 E. Color 91101101
RRRARR
yne, ne,
illiams, and , and
een Crawfordd
2012
Cultural Resources Records Cultural Resources Record
for Tfor T--Mobile West, LLCMobile West, LLC CaCa
Rugs), 634Rugs) 634 East ColEast Col
Angeles County, Ca

RRRRRADRR
Perez, DonPerez, Don 2013013 Los Robles/En
Avenue, PasA

DRDRDRRRDDDDRDRDRDRRRR
4499
D
00 D
99 D
etained Jones & Stokes to conetained Jones & Stokes to
consisted of the installaconsisted of the instal
Angeles and OrangAngeles and Orang
dways. Adways. A secsec
he cuhe cu

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
19 January 2020
LLA-08816
Caltrans, District 07 retained Discovery Works, Inc. to prepare an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) in support of Playhouse District Streetscapes, Walkways and Alleys Project in the City of Pasadena. The project proposed the installation of amenities along sidewalks within the NRHP listed Pasadena Playhouse Historic District (District), Proposed amenities included new pedestrian lighting, enhanced landscaping, street furniture, public signage, and public art. Ground disturbance was not expected to exce ed 18-inches below the existing sidewalk. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) was limited to the extent of the District, which is bound by Union Street to the north, Lake Avenue to the east, Los Robles Avenue to the west, and Gr een Street to the South. The project APE is adjacent to the current Project site at Green Street.

The ASR focused on project affects to archaeological resources only. Built environment resources were not considered during the study. No archaeological resources were identified within or immediately adjacent to the APE as a result of the CHRIS search, SLF search, Native American outreach, and intensive survey. The management recommendation consisted of the standard measure for the unanticipated discovery of cultural resources during project construction.

Previously Recorded Cultural Resources
The CHRIS records search indicates that 52 cultural resources have been previously recorded within 0.5-mile of the Project site, none of which intersect or are adjacent to the Project site. All of the previously recorded cultural resources within the records search area consist of built environment resources. These resources generally date to early twentieth century Pasadena and showcase the City Beautiful Movement, which is discussed in Section 3.3 Historic Period Overview. The built environment resources consist of three NRHP listed districts; one government building; four educational buildings including one specif ied as a “woman’s property”; five community buildings including one specified as a “woman’s property”; four religious buildings; 19 commercial buildings; three hotels; six multi-family properties including one with a commercial property component and one consisting of 40 bungalow courts; and seven single-family properties. Table 2, below, provides details of these previously recorded resources.

No prehistoric or historic-era archaeological resources were identified within the Project site or 0.5-mile search radius as a result of the CHRIS search.

Table 2. Previously Recorded Cultural Resoources Within a 0.5-MMile Radius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
180417 — Historic: Single-family
property
Ernest W. Smith
House: 272 South
Los Robles Avenue
(built 1910)
1S: Listed in the NR
(1988)
OHP HRI No. 031123
1979
(Pomeroy, E.);
1986
(Milkovich, A.)
Outside
180418 — Historic: Religious
building
Throop Memorial
Universalist Church:
300 South Los
Robles Avenue (built
1922-1923)
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (1979)
OHP HRI No. 031124
1979
(Pomeroy, E.) Outside
DRAFT
ituritur
xisting sidxisting s
Union Street to Union S
uth. The project APE isuth. The p
nly. Built environment resources werenly. Built environment reso ntified within or immediately adjacent to tntified within or immediately adjace outreach, and intensive survey. The maoutreach, and intensive survey. The ma unanticiunant pated discovery of cultural resodiscov
ultural resources have been previously reral resources have been previous re adjacent to the Project site. All of tcent to the Project site. All of t a consist of built environment resourcesbuilt environment resource nd showcase the City Beautid showcase the City Beauti ful Movemeveme lt environment resources consist of threlt environment resources co ildings including one specified as a “woildings including one specified a “woman’s property”; four religious builda “woman’s property”; four religious including one with a commercial properncluding one with a commercial prope ngle-family properties.amily properties. Table 2, below, prTable 2, below, pr historic-era archaeological resources warchaeological resources w sult of the CHRIS searcult of the CHRIS search.h.
22 D
..

D
PP
D
rr
D
ee
D
v
D
i
D
o
D
u
D
s
D
l
D
y
D
R
DR
ee
DR
cc
DR
oo
DR
rr
DR
dd
DR
ee
DR
d
DR
C
DR
u
DR
ll
DR
tt
DR
uu
DR
rr
R
aa
R
ll
R
R
R
e
R
s
DD
y
DD
Tri
D
(CA-LA
DD
rce A
D
Type

DDDDDDD
HistoricHistoric
propprop
DDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
20 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
180424 — Historic: Single-family
property
Benshoff House: 205
South Oakland
Avenue (built 1896)
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (1979)
OHP HRI No. 031130
1979
(Sullivan, G.)
Outside
180465 — Historic: Government
building
Pasadena City Hall:
100 North Garfield
Avenue (built 1926)
3: Appears eligible for
NR (1985, 1984)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1979)
3D: Appears eligible for
NR as a contributor to an
NR eligible district
OHP HRI No. 031172
1985
(Unknown) Outside
180473 — Historic: Community
building
Odds Fellows
Temple: 175 North
Los Robles Avenue
(built 1933)
1S: Listed in the NR
(1985)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1980)
OHP HRI No. 031180
1983 (Long,
M. and R.

Sicha)
Outside

180476 — Historic: Commercial
building
Pitzer & Warwick
Clothing Store: 325
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1925)
3D: Appears eligible for
NR as a contributor to an
NR eligible district (1979)
OHP HRI No. 031183
1979
(Unknown) Outside

180485 — Historic: Single-family
property
Pinney House: 180
South Euclid Avenue
(built 1906)
HRI#031192
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (1979)
OHP HRI No. 031192
1979 (Scheid,
A.) Outside
180486 — Historic: Community
building
The Masonic
Temple: 200 South
Euclid Avenue (built
1926)
2S2: Eligible for the
NR/Listed in the CR
(1986)
OHP HRI No. 031193
1985 (Long,
M., L. Melton,
and D. Hlava)
Outside
180489 — Historic: Hotel/Multiple-
family property
Livingstone Hotel
and Apartments:
131-139 South Los
Robles Avenue (built
1927)
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (2002)
OHP HRI No. 031196
2002
(Moruzzi, P.) Outside

180490 — Historic: Multiple-family
property
Stanley Apartments:
141 South Los
Robles Avenue (built
1926) ; Multiple
family
property;HRI#031197
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (2002)
OHP HRI No. 031197
2002
(Moruzzi, P.) Outside

DRAFT
130130
1979 197
(Sullivan,(
T
ligible for ligible for
, 1984)1984)
ntributor to a NR ntributo
ed district (1979)ed distric
3D: Appears eligible for 3D: App
NR as a contributor to an NR a
NR eligible districtNR eligible district
OHP HRI No. 031172OHP HRI No. 0311
1985 85
(Unknown)own) Ou
TTT
AFFTT
lows
ple: 175 North p
s Robles s Robles Avenue A
(built 1933)ilt 1933)
1S: Listed in the NR 1S: Listed in t
(1985)1985)
1D: Contributor to a NR Contribu
listed district (1980)strict (198
OHP HRI No. 031180No. 0311
19 AFAFAFTFTFTAAFFT
ercial
Pitzer & Warwick & Wa
Clothing Store: 325 g Store: 325
East Colorado orado
Boulevard (built (built
1925)1
3D: Appears el3D: Appears e
NR as a conac o n
NR eligib
OHP
AAAFAFAFARAAFHistoric: SingleHistoric: -family ily
property operty
Pinney House: 180 Pinney House: 180
South Euclid AvenueSouth Euclid Avenue
(built 1906) (built 1906)
HRI#03119231192

RARARAAA
DRAA
—— Historic: Community Historic: Community
building ilding
The Maso
Temp
Eu

DDDRRRDDR
—— Historic: Hotel/MuHotel
family propertyproper

DDDDDDDDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
21 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
180495 —
Historic: Office
buildings/Multiple-family
properties
Row of 1920s era
office buildings and
apartments: 127,
139, 149, 157, 171-
175, 191, 197-201
South Los Robles
Avenue (built circa
1904-1927)
6: Determined ineligible
for the NR (1979)
1979 (Link, J.) Outside
180496 — Historic: Commercial
building
F.W. Woolworth Co.:
387-399 East
Colorado Boulevard
(built 1941)
6: Determined ineligible
for the NR (1979)
7R: Not evaluated (n.d.)

OHP HRI No. 031203
1979
(DeMayo, D.,
N.

Timpastato,
and A.

Scheid)
Outside

180521 — Historic: Educational
building
Grace Nicholson
Building: 46 North
Los Robles Avenue
(built 1925)
1CL: Automatically listed
in the CR (1989) as
California Registered
Landmark No. 988
7L: Needs to be
reevaluated (1989)
OHP HRI No. 031228
1976 (Brewer,
P.) Outside
180522 — Historic: Commercial
building
Walter W. Gerlach
Building: 464-468
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1922)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1979)
OHP HRI No. 031229
1979
(Scheid,
A.) Outside
180523 — Historic: Commercial
building
Harry Fitzgerald
Building: 489 East
Colorado Boulevard
(built 1926)
3: Appears eligible for
NR (1979)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1994)
OHP HRI No. 031230
1979 (Scheid,
A.) Outside
180524 — Historic: Commercial
building
Star-News Building:
525 East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1924-1925)
3: Appears eligible for
NR (1979)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1994)
2S2: Eligible for
NR/Listed in CR (1998)
OHP HRI No. 031231
1979 (Scheid,
A.) Outside
180525 — Historic: Religious
building
Pasadena
Presbyterian Church:
585 East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1962)
6: Determined ineligible
for the NR (1979)
7N: Needs to be
reevaluated (n.d.)
OHP HRI No. 031232
1979 (Scheid,
A.) Outside
DRAFT
ligible ligible
79)79) 1979 (Link, J.

FTT
vardrd
6: Determined ineligible 6: Determined ine
for the NR (1979)for the NR (1979)
7R: Not evaluated (n.d.)7R: Not evaluated
OHP HRI No. 031203OHP HRI No. 0
1979
(DeMayo, D., o, D.,
N.

Timpastato
and A.

Sche

FTFTFTTT
AFFTT
Grace Nicholson ace Nicholson
Building: 46 North ding: 46 North
Los Robles Avenue obles
(built 1925)925)
1CL: Automatically listed Automat
in the CR (1989) as R (1989)
California Registered California Registere
Landmark No. 988Landmark No. 988
7L: Needs to7L: Needs to beb
reevaluated uated
OHP HR

AFAFAFFF
RAAFF
toric: Commercial toric: Co
building building
Walter W. Gerlach Walter W. Gerlac
Building: 464B --468 468
East Colorado
Boulevard (built Boulevard (built
1922)1922)

RARARAAA
1 A
DRAA
—— Historic: Commercial Historic: Commercial
building ilding
Harry Fitz
Buildin
Co

DDDRRRDDR
—— Historic: Comric: Com
building building

DDDDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
22 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
180526 — Historic: Commercial
building
First Trust Building
and Garage: 587
East Colorado
Boulevard and 34-
44 North Madison
Avenue (built 1927)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1994)
1S: Listed in the NR
(1987)
OHP HRI No. 031233
1979 (Scheid,
A.); 1986
(Milkovich,
A.); 1987
(Gualtieri, K.);
1993
(Kliwinski, L.
and J.C.

Wilson)
Outside

180527 — Historic: Community
building
Pasadena
Playhouse: 39 South
El Molino Avenue
(built 1924)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1994)
7K: Resubmitted to
CHP
but not reevaluated
(1985, 1980)
7L: Needs to be
reevaluated (1983, 1977)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1975)
1CL: Automatically listed
in the CR (1975) as
California Registered
Landmark No. 887
OHP HRI No. 031234
1980
(Arbuckle, J.)
Outside
180530 — Historic: Commercial
building
Singer Building: 520
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1926)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1994)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1985)
OHP HRI No. 031237
1984
(Heumann, L.
and L. Melton)
Outside
180548 — Historic: Multiple-family
property
Herkimer Arms: 527
East Union Street
(built 1894-1912)
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (1980)
OHP HRI No. 031255
1980
(Gregory, T.)
Outside
180557 —
Historic: Community
building/Women's
property
Edward Blinn House:
160 North Oakland
Avenue (built 1905)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (2010)
3S: Appears eligible for
NR through survey
evaluation (2001)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(2001)
OHP HRI No. 031264
2000
(Gregory, T.);
2001
(Gregory, T.)
Outside
DRAFT
NR NR
4)4)
e NR e NR
I No. 031233No. 03
1919
A.)A.); 19;
(Milkovic(
A.); 1987
(Gualtieri, K.);
1993 199
(Kliwinski, L. (Kliwin
and J.C. and J.C.

Wilson)son)
FTT
ena
ayhouse: 39 South ayhouse: 39
El Molino Avenue Molino Avenue
(built 1924)t 1924
1D: Contributor to a NR 1D: C
listed district (1994)listed district (1994)
7K: Resubmitted to7K: Resubmitted to CHP
but not reevaluated but not reevalua
(1985, 1980)(1985, 1980
7L: Needs to be Needs t
reevaluated (1983, 1977)uated (19
1S: Listed in NR and CRd in NR a
(1975)(197
1CL: Automatical1CL: Automatical
in the CR (197the CR (197
California RR
Landma
OHP

FTFTFTTT

RAAFFTT
Historic: Commercial Historic: Commercial
building ding
Singer Building: 520 g: 520
East Colorado East Colorado
Boulevard (built Boulevard (built
1926)

RARARAAA
DRAA
— Historic: Multiplestoric: Mu -family family
property erty
Herk
E

DDDRRRDDR
Historic: Cotoric: Co
building/building/
propeprope

DDDDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
23 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
180565 — Historic: District
Ford Place Historic
District: 110-175
North Oakland
Avenue; 450-465
Ford Place; and 144
North Los Robles
Avenue (built circa
1902)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(2010)
OHP HRI No. 031272
2010 (Beall,
E.) Outside

180570 — Historic: Community
building
Scottish Rite
Cathedral: 150 North
Madison Avenue
(built 1925) ;
Community
center/social hall;
Religious building;
HRI#031277
2S2: Eligible for the
NR/Listed in the CR
(2005, 1984)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1994)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1984)
OHP HRI No. 031277
1983 (Long,
M.) Outside

180579 — Historic: Single-family
property
Theodore Parker
Lukens House: 267
North El Molino
Avenue (built 1886-
1887)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1984)
OHP HRI No. 031286
1983
(Graunke, C.) Outside
180698 — Historic: Single-family
properties
Harnetiaux Court: 48
North Catalina
Avenue (built 1922)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1994)
OHP HRI No. 083076
1994
(Kliwinski, L.)
Outside
180706 — Historic: District
Pasadena Playhouse
Historic District: 464-
611 East Colorado
Boulevard; 550-655
East Green Street;
21-127 South El
Molino Avenue; and
150 North-101 South
Madison Avenue
(built circa 1920s and
1930s)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1994)
OHP HRI No. 084048
1992 (Howse,
C.); 1993
(Kliwinski, L.)

Outside
180736 — Historic: Commercial
building
Kindel Building: 1095
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1927)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1996)
OHP HRI No. 064617
1995
(Goeken, B.);
2000 (Grimes,
T.)
Outside
180759 — Historic: Commercial
building
Bullock's Pasadena:
401 South Lake
Avenue (built 1947)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(2009, 1996)
OHP HRI No. 032770
1996 (Hess,
A.) Outside

DRAFT
d CR d CR
031272031272
2010 (Beall,
E.)
FTT
ocial hall;
ous building;
RI#031277RI#031277
2S2: Eligible for the 2S2: Elig
NR/Listed in the CR NR/L
(2005, 1984)(2
1D: Contributor to a NR 1D: Contributor to
listed district (1994listed district (19 )
1S: Listed in NR and CR 1S: Listed in
(1984)984)
OHP HRI No. 031277HRI No. 0
1983 (Long
M.)

FTFTFTTT
AFFTT
y
Theodore Parker odore Parker
Lukens House: 267 ns House: 267
North El Molino El Mo
Avenue (built 1886(built 1886--
1887)
1S: Listed in NR a1S: Listed in NR a
(1984)(1984)
OHP HRI NoHRI No

AFAFAFRAAF
ic: Singleic: Singl -family
operties operties
Harnetiaux Court: 48 Harnetiaux Court
North Catalina North Catalina
Avenue (built 1922)1922)
1S:
(

RARARAAARAA
D
— Historic: District oric: Dis
Pasadena PlayhoPasadena Playho
Historic DistriccD i s t r i c
611 East C
Bouleva
East
2 RARARADDRA
HistoHisto
bubuDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
24 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
181075 — Historic: Religious
building
Pasadena First
Congregational
Church: 464 East
Walnut Street (built
1927)
6: Determined ineligible
for the NR (1980)
7R: Not evaluated (n.d.)

OHP HRI No. 031311
1980 (Pope,
P. and A.

Scheid)
Outside

181857 — Historic: Single-family
property
A.C. Stanley Home:
326-328 South Los
Robles Avenue (built
1893)
7R: Not evaluated (n.d.)
OHP HRI No. 032333
1983 (Miller,
D.) Outside

181879 — Historic: Educational
building
McKinley Junior High
School: 325 South
Oak Knoll Avenue
(built 1923-1927)
3: Appears eligible for
NR, CR, and Local listing
(1999, 2011)
OHP HRI No. 032355
1999 (Grimes,
T. and L.

Heumann);
2011
(McKenna,
J.A.)
Outside

182902 — Historic: Single-family
property
Forster House: 1114
Del Mar Boulevard
(built 1923)
6Z: Determined ineligible
for the CR, not evaluated
for NR or Local (2017)
OHP HRI No. 033380
2017 (Nayyar,
M.) Outside
182903 — Historic: Multiple-family
property
1124 East Del Mar
Boulevard (built circa
1920 and 1952)
6Z: Determined ineligible
for the CR, not evaluated
for NR or Local (2017)
OHP HRI No. 033381
2017 (Nayyar,
M.) Outside
183133 — Historic: Commercial
building
McDaneld Motor Co.:
1021 East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1922) ; 1-3 Story
commercial building;
HRI#064616
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064616
1991
(Unknown) Outside

183139 — Historic: Commercial
building
Lieberg Building:
909-911 East
Colorado Boulevard
(built 1926)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064622
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside
183140 — Historic: Hotel
Hotel Constance:
940 East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1926)
2S3: Determined eligible
for NR by Part I Tas
Certification/Listed in CR
(n.d.)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064623
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside
183141 — Historic: Hotel
Hotel Mentor: 953-
965 East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1923)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064624
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside
DRAFT
n.d.)n.d.)
13111311
1980 198
P. and AP
Scheid)
T
ot evaluated (n.d.)ot evalua
P HRI No. 032333P HRI N
1983 (Miller, 1983 (M
D.)) Outs

TTTTFTT
High High
South
Avenue
923-1927)
3: Appears eligible for 3: Appears eligible f
NR, CR, and Local listing NR, CR, and Loc
(1999, 2011)(1999, 2011)
OHP HRI No. 032355HP HRI
1999 (Grimes, mes,
T. and L.

Heumann
2011
(M

FTFTFTTT
AFFTT
Forster House: 1114 ster House: 1114
Del Mar Boulevard ar Bo
(built 1923)923)
6Z: Determined ineligimined ine
for the CR, not evafor the CR, not eva
for NR or Local for NR or Loca
OHP HRI NoHRI No

AFAFAFRAAF
MultipleMultiple-family ily
erty erty
1124 East Del Mar Del M
Boulevard (built circa Boulevard (built ci
1920 and 1952)1920 and 1952)

RARARAA
6Z: Dete
for th
fo
AARAA
—— Historic: Commercial Commerc
buildingbuildin
McDaneld Motor CMcDaneld Motor C
1021 East Colo1 East Colo
Boulevard (
1922) ; 1
comm
HR

RARARADDRA
— Historic: Commercial Comm
building
DDDDDRDDHiHiDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
25 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
183142 — Historic: Commercial
building
Beverly Pasadena
Bowling Co.: 968-972
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1929)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064625
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside

183143 — Historic: Commercial
building
Frank Collins
Company: 985-993
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1928)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064626
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside
183144 — Historic: Commercial
building
Allied Auto Supply:
1060 East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1952)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064627
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside

183145 — Historic: Commercial
building
Firestone: 1100
Colorado Boulevard
(built 1945-1948) ; 1-
3 Story commercial
building;
HRI#064628
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064628
1987
(Impastato,
N.)
Outside

183146 — Historic: Educational
building
Parkers/Watterson
College: 1155 East
Colorado Boulevard
(built 1939 and 1950)
7R: Not evaluated (1991)
OHP HRI No. 064629
1987
(Impastato,
N.); 2000
(Grimes, T.)
Outside

183600 — Historic: District
Pasadena Civic
Center District:

Garfield Avenue
(built circa 1920s)
1S: Listed in NR and CR
(1979)
OHP HRI No. 075183
1978 (Hays,
C.S.); 1979
(Brown, D.)
Outside

184671 — Historic: Commercial
building
Smith's Upholstery:
1055 East Walnut
Street (built 1936)
7R:

Not evaluated (1990)
OHP HRI No. 087683
1990
(DeWolfe, S.)
Outside
184963 —
Historic: Educational
building/Women's
property
Miss Orton's
Classical School for
Girls: 154 South
Euclid Avenue (built
1900)
1D: Contributor to a NR
listed district (1995)
3D: Appears eligible for
NR as a contributor to an
NR eligible district (1995)
OHP HRI No. 097179
1993 (Gerber,
M. and J.

Harlan)
Outside
188270 — Historic: Commercial
building
Sears Roebuck &
Company: 530-532
East Colorado
Boulevard (built
1924)
6Y:

Determined ineligible
for NR, not evaluated for
CR or Local listing
(2007)
2007
(Supernowicz,
D.)
Outside
DRAFT
91)91)
2525
1987 198
(Impastat(
N.)
T
Not evaluated (1991)Not eva
HP HRI No. 064626HP HRI
1987 1987
(Impastato, mpastato,
N.)
Outs

TTTTFFTT
ly: y:
orado
(built
7R: Not evaluated (1991)7R: Not evaluate
OHP HRI No. 064627OHP HRI No.
1987
(Impast
N.)

FFFTFTFTAFFT
estone: 1100 estone: 110
Colorado Boulevard orado Boulevard
(built 1945t 1945-1948) ; 148) ; 1--
3 Story commercial y com
building; g;
HRI#064628628
7R: Not evaluated (7R: Not evaluated (
OHP HRI No. 06OHP HRI No. 06

AFAFAFFF
RAAFF
c: c: Educational Educ
ildingilding
Parkers/Watterson Parkers/Watterso
A
College: 1155 East College: 1155 Eas
Colorado Boulevard Colorado Boulevard
(built 1939 and 1950(built 1939 and 1950
7R

RARARAAARAA
— Historic: DistrictHistoric: District
PasadenaPasadena CivicCivic
Center Distri
Garfield A
(built c
RRRDR671671 — Historic: Commercial ic: Com
building
S

DDDRRRDDR
Historic: Eduoric: Edu
building/Wbuilding/W
properproper

DDDDDDD

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
26 January 2020
TTable 2. Previously Recorded CCultural RResources Within a 0.5--MMile RRadius oof the Project Site Primary
(P-19-)
Trinomial
(CA-LAN-)
Resource Age and
Type
Resource
Description NRHP Eligibility Recording
Events
Proximity
to Project
Site
189213 — Historic: Commercial
building
Pep Boys: 1135 East
Colorado Boulevard
(built 1970)
5S3: Appears eligible for
Local listing (2000)
6L: Determined ineligble
for Local listing/May
warrant special
consideration in planning
(n.d.)
OHP HRI No. 139891
2000 (Grimes,
T.) Outside
190483 — Historic: Single-family
property
216 West Palm Drive
(built 1950) 7R: Not evaluated (2012)
2012 (Bechtel,
E. and C.

Tibbet)
Outside

190680 — Historic: Multi-family
properties
Study of 40
bungalow courts in
Pasadena: (built
circa 1910s through
1930s)
1S: Listed in NR are 27
of the bungalow courts
(1981)
OHP HRI No. 030783
1981 (Sicha,
R.J.) Outside

190777 — Historic: Commercial
building
Los Robles: 80 South
Lake Avenue (built
1967)
6Y: Determined ineligible
for NR, not evaluated for
CR or Local listing
(2013)
2013
(Francisco,
S.)
Outside

192477 — Historic: Religious
building
Ahiah Center for
Spiritual Living: 277
North El Molino
Avenue (built 1912
and 1959)
6Z: Ineligible for NR, CR,
or Local listing (2015)
2015
(Ehringer, C.)
Outside

2.2 CHRID Records Search
Dudek also conducted a review of the California Historical Resources Inventory Database (CHRID), specifically for properties entered by the City of Pasadena. The CHRID promotes and protects cultural heritage through documenting and sharing information on historical resources. CHRID was developed through the California State Office of Historic Preservation's Certified Local Government (CLG) Grant Program and partially funded through the Federal Historic Preservation Fund Program.

All properties within the Project site were searched in the online CHRID. As a result, none of the properties located within the Project site are listed in the online CHRID and therefore have not been previously evaluated. A review of Pasadena’s Historic and Landmark Districts indicates that the Project site does not fall within any existing historic districts. The Project site is approximately two blocks east of the NRHP-listed Pasadena Playhouse district, and several blocks west of the Green Street Village Landmark District. A review of the CHRID confirmed that no properties within the Project site have been previously evaluated for historical significance.

DRAFT
gble gble
ay ay
on in planning on in planning
HRI No. 139891HRI N
2000 (Grime
T.)
FTT
7R: Not evaluated (2012)7R: Not evaluated
2012 (Bechtel, (Bechtel,
E. and C.

Tibbet)
FTFTFTTTFFTTcourts in
ena: (built
a 1910s through a 1910s
1930s)30s)
1S: Listed in NR are 27 1S: Listed in NR
of the bungalow courts of the bunga
(1981)981)
OHP HRI No. 030783HRI No. 0
1981
R
FFFTFTFTAFFT Los Robles: 80 South Robles: 80 South
Lake Avenue (built Avenue (built
1967)
6Y: Determined inel6Y: Determined ine
for NR, not evalufor NR, not evalu
CR or Local liR or Local li
(2013)

AFAFAFRAAF
oric: Religious oric: Rel
building building
Ahiah Center for Ahiah Center for
Spiritual Living: 277 Spiritual Living: 27
North El Molino North El Molino
DRA
Avenue (built 1912 Avenue (built 1912
and 1959)and 1959)
6 RARARAAA

DDDDRRARRA
CHRID Records SeCHRID Records
also conducted a review of the Calalso conducted a review of t s entered by the City of Ps entered by the City o
g and sharing informatig and sharing informat
c Preservation's Cc Preservation's C
eservation eservation

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
27 January 2020

2.3 Native American Coordination
NAHC Sacred Lands File Search
Dudek contacted the NAHC on August 13, 2019, and requested a review of the SLF. The NAHC replied via email on September 13, 2019, stating that the results of the SLF search were positive. The NAHC recommended contacting the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation for more information. The NAHC also suggested contacting an additional six Native American individuals and/or tribal organizations who may have direct knowledge of cultural resources in or near the Project site. No additional tribal outreach was conducted by Dudek; however, in compliance with AB 52, the City has contacted all NAHC -listed traditionally geographically affiliated tribal representatives that have requested project notification. AB 52 consultation efforts conducted by the City are discussed in the following paragraph. Documentation of Dudek’s coordination with Native American groups and individuals is provided in Appendix C.

Assembly Bill 52 Consultation
The Project is subject to compliance with AB 52 (PRC 21074), which requires consideration of impacts to TCRs as part of the CEQA process, and that the lead agency notify California Native American T ribal representatives (that have requested notification) who are traditionally or culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed Project. All NAHC-listed California Native American Tribal representatives that have requested project notification pursuant to AB 52 were sent letters by the City on January 2, 2020. The letters contained a project description, outline of AB 52 timing, request for consultation, and co ntact information for the appropriate lead agency representative. Documents related to AB 52 consultation are on file with the City of Pasadena.

2.4 Building Development and Archival Research
Building development and archival research were conducted for the Project site in an effort to establish a thorough and accurate historic context for the significance evaluation s, and to confirm the building development history of the Project site and associated parcels.

City of Pasadena Permit Center
On August 20, 2019, Dudek visited the City of Pasadena Permit Center and obtained all building permits and records for properties within the Project site for new construction, demolition, alteration, and additions.

Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor
On August 20, 2019, Dudek researched property characteristic records for the Project site in order to establish dates of construction.

Historical Newspaper Search
Dudek reviewed historical newspapers covering the City of Pasadena and overall County of Los Angeles in an effort to understand the development of the Project site. All information obtained from the historical newspaper search was incorporated into the historic context.

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
28 January 2020
HHistorical Aerial Photographs
Historic aerial photographs of the Project site were available from Nationwide Environmental Title Research LLC (NETR) maps for the years 1952, 1953, 1964, 1972, 1977, 1980, 1994, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 and from the University of Cali fornia, Santa Barbara (UCSB), FrameFinder Maps for the years 1927, 1936, 1944, 1956, 1968, and 1971. The earliest aerial photograph dates from 1927 and indicates that the project area was located just east of the center of Old Pasadena. The surrounding area has been fully developed with residential and commercial properties. The Project site is also fully developed besides one lot facing onto East Green Street. The buildings along South Oak Knoll Avenue and South Hudson Avenue appear to be single- family residences. The 1936 and 1944 aerials display very little noticeable changes to the project area and its surrounding area. The 1952 and 1953 photographs shows several changes from the 1944 aerial in the replacement of the residences along South Hudson Avenue for a large L-shaped building and parking lots, and the removal of the majority of the trees along the open lot facing onto East Green Street. The residence located at 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue was replaced with a multi-story rectangular building. An additional change is seen in the demolition of the two buildings at the corner of East Green Street and South Hudson Avenue. The 1956 aerial shows the construction of a square building and parking lot along East Green Street replacing the only open plot of land on the subject property.

The 1964 photograph displays the removal of the residences located at 760-762 East Green Street and 106 South Oak Knoll Avenue. The buildings on South Oak Knoll Avenue were replaced with a parking lot and the buildings on South Green Street were replaced with a commercial property. An irregularly shaped structure was constructed on the open lot at the corner of East Green Street and South Hudson Avenue. The block from South Oak Knoll Avenue and South Hudson Avenue contains a solid row of buildi ngs. The Project site appears to have undergone little change since this period in comparison with modern aerial photographs. In the 1972 aerial, a large highway interchange between CA-134 and CA-710 was constructed west of the project area and is one of the last noticeable changes to the surrounding area (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019).

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
The Project site was reviewed on City of Pasadena Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps for the years 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1894, 1903, 1910, 1931, and 1951. The Project site is visible on two maps from the years 1931 and 1951. 1931 Sanborn Map
The 1931 Sanborn displays 11 lots, the majority of which are developed with residential properties.

The properties at 116 and 106 South Oak Knoll Avenue disp lay similar two-story dwellings with a side front entry porch, wood shingle roofs, and one-story rear wings with composition roofs. The dwelling at 106 South Oak Knoll also displays a one-and-a-half-story auxiliary building at the rear of the property with a wood shingle roof.

The property at 740 East Green Street displays two buildings: the first is located on the corner of South Oak Knoll Avenue and East Green Street and is a two-story composition roof commercial picture framing and paints shop. The building is labeled as a store that is wood frame with wood posts and a brick wall on the first floor only. This building also features two wire glass skylights and a wire glass rear addition. The second building on the property is a one- story auxiliary structure with a composition roof.

DRAFT
fromfrom
ounding aoundin
developed besidedevelop
Hudson Hudson AvenueAv appear
e changes to the e changes to the project are
changes from the 1944 aerial changes from the 1
e Le L--shaped building and parkingshaped building and parki lots, and EastEast Green Gr Street. The residence locatedence lo
gular building. gular b An additional change is sAn additional change is s eet eet and South Hudson and South HudsonAvenue. The 195 ng East Green st Gree Street treet replacing the re only e residences located at 760e residences located at 760--762 76 East Gr ak Knoll Avenoll Avenuenue were replaced with a pawere replaced with a commercial property. An irregularly shapcial property. An irregularly shap n Street and South Hudson AveSouth Hudson Avenue. nue. TheThe ss a solid row of buildings. a solid row of buildings. The T Projectt mparison with modern aerial photograpmparison with modern aeria and CAand CA-710 was constructed west of thewas constructed we ng areang area (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019019; UCSB 2019). ). n
D
c
D
e
D
M
DR
a
DR
pp
DR
ss
DR
ee was reviewed on City of Pasadena Sanwas reviewed on City of 4, 1903, 194, 1903, 1910, 1931, and 1951. The 10, 1931, and 1951 P SS
D
aa
D
nn
D
bb
DD
o
D
r
D
nn
D
M
D
a
D
p
D
1 Sanborn displays 1 Sanbo 11 lotslots, the
at 116 and 106 Sat 116 and 106 S
le roofs, anle roofs, an
ndnd--aa--hh

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
29 January 2020
The property at 760-762 East Green Street displays three structures: the building closest to East Green Street is a one-story wood frame dwelling with a wood shingle roof and entry porch, the next building is a one-story auxiliary building with a composition roof, and the third building is a one-story dwelling with a composition roof, terra cotta chimney, and one-story entry porch. The next lot to the left is vacant.

The property at 776 East Green Street contains a single, one-story dwelling with a wood shingle roof and two wood frame sections and the rear section displays a composition roof.

The property at 790-796 East Green Street contains two buildings the first is a one-story wood frame gas and oil building the other is a “Battery, Vulcanizing, and Greasing” commercial wood frame structure with a composition roof.

The properties at 95, 101-103, 113, and 123 South Hudson Avenue all contain dwellings. The building located at 95 South Hudson Avenue is one-story with a wood shingle roof and two wood frame extensions. The lot containing 101-103 South Hudson Avenue displays four buildings, the one closest to the street is the largest at one-and-one- half-story with a shingle roof and three wood frame one-story rooms. The next house is one-story with a composition roof, and the two other building are one-story auxiliary structures. The properties at 113 and 123 South Hudson Avenue both display two-story dwellings and both main buildings have a one-story auxiliary structure at the rear of their properties with composition roofs, and a front one-story porch (Sanborn 1931). 1 1951 Sanborn Map
The 1951 Sanborn Map does not indicate any changes to the following properties: 790-790 East Green Street and 95 South Hudson Avenue. The properties at 750 East Green Street and 760-762 East Green Street indicate only minor changes. Both 116 and 106 South Oak Knoll Avenue have been replaced. The home at 116 is replaced with a one- and two-story office buildings and 106 South Oak Knoll Avenue is replaced with two one-and-a-half-story dwellings with composition roofs and a one-story hollow cement block auxiliary building. The dwelling at 776 East Green Street was replaced with a small one-story wood frame restaurant with a composition roof. All three dwellings located at 101-103, 113, and 123 East Green Street have been replaced with a large L-shaped one-story office building with a composition roof and wood posts. Around the building is a se ries of wood frame eaves and eleven windows (Sanborn 1951).

DRAFT
shinshin
oneone--story wood framstor
d frame structure with a cod frame structu
e e all contain dwellings. all co The building locae buildi nd two wood frame extensions. The lot cnd two wood frame extensions. The lot ne closest to the street is thne closest to the stree e largest at t ory rooms.ooms. The next house The next hou is one-story wit y structures. The properties s. The prope at 113 and
ain buildings have a oneve a one-story auxiliary s
ont oneont one-story porchst (Sanborn 1931)nborn 1 .
icate any changes to the following propees to the following prope operties at operties at 750 East Green t Green Street S and 7 106 South Oak Knoll 106 South Oak K Avenuenue have beenh buildingbuildi sg and 106 106 South Oak Knoll k Kn Av
ion roofs and a oneon roofs and a one--story hollow cementstory hollow cemen laced with a small oned with a small one--story wood frame story wood frame 03, 113, and 123 East Green nd 123 East Street t haha
composition roof and wood posts. Aroucomposition roof and wo ananborn 1951). born 1951).

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
30 January 2020
3 Cultural Setting

3.1 Prehistoric Overview
Evidence for continuous human occupation in Southern California spans the last 10,000 years. Various attempts to parse out variability in archaeological assemblages over this broad period have led to the development of several cultural chronologies; some of these are based on geologic time, most are based on temporal trends in archaeological assemblages, and others are interpretive reconstructions. To be more inclusive, this research employs a common set of generalized terms used to describe chronological trends in assemblage composition:

Paleoindian (pre-5500 BC), Archaic (8000 BC–AD 500), Late Prehistoric (AD 500–1769), and Ethnohistoric (post- AD 1769).

P
Paleoindian Period (pre-5500 BC)
Evidence for Paleoindian occupation in the region is tenu ous. Our knowledge of associated cultural pattern(s) is informed by a relatively sparse body of data that has been collected from within an area extending from coastal San Diego, through the Mojave Desert, and beyond. One of the earliest dated archaeological assemblages in the region is located in coastal Southern California (though contemporaneous sites are present in the Channel Islands) derives from SDI-4669/W-12 in La Jolla. A human burial from SDI-4669 was radiocarbon dated to 9,590–9,920 years before present (95.4% probability) (Hector 2006). Th e burial is part of a larger site complex that contained more than 29 human burials associated with an assemblage that fits the Archaic profile (i.e., large amounts of ground stone, battered cobbles, and expedient flake tools). In contrast, typical Paleoindian assemblages include large stemmed projectile points, high proportions of formal lithic tools, bifacial lith ic reduction strategies, and relatively small proportions of ground stone tools. Prime examples of this pattern are sites that were studied by Emma Lou Davis (1978) on Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake near Ridgecrest, California. These sites contained fluted and unfluted stemmed points and large numbers of formal flake tools (e.g., shaped scrapers, blades). Other typical Paleoindian sites include the Komo do site (MNO-679)—a multi-component fluted point site, and MNO-680—a single component Great Basined Stemmed point site (see Basgall et al. 2002). At MNO-679 and -680, ground stone tools were rare while finely made projectile points were common.

Warren et al. (2004) claimed that a biface manufacturing tradition present at the Harris site complex (SDI-149) is representative of typical Paleoindian occupation in the region that possibly dates between 10,365 and 8,200 BC (Warren et al. 2004). Termed San Dieguito (see also Rogers 1945), assemblages at the Harris site are qualitatively distinct from most others in region because the site has large numbers of finely made bifaces (including projectile points), formal flake tools, a biface reduction trajectory, and relatively small amounts of processing tools (see also Warren 1968). Despite the unique assemblage composition, the definition of San Dieguito as a separate cultural tradition is hotly debated. Gallegos (1987) suggested that the San Dieguito pattern is simply an inland manifestation of a broader economic pattern. Gallegos’s interpretation of San Dieguito has been widely accepted in recent years, in part because of the difficulty in distinguishing San Dieguito components from other assemblage constituents. In other w o r d s , i t i s e a s i e r t o i g n o r e S a n D i e g u i t o a s a d i s t i n c t s o c i o e c o n o m i c p a t t e r n t h a n i t i s t o d r a w i t o u t o f m i x e d assemblages.

DRAFT
10,000 years. Va10,000
ve led to thee led to th developme
st are based on temporal tst are based on
ns. To be more inclusive, this resns. To be more inclus nological trends in assemblage composnological trends in assemblag istoric (AD 500istoric ( –1769), and EthnohistorEthnoh
is tenuous. Our knowledge of associateknowled
at has been collected from within an areat has been collected from wit beyondond. One of the earliest dated archae. One of the earliest dated arc ornia (though contemporaneous sites areough contemporaneous sites are a. A human burial from SDIburial from SDI-4669 was r4669 was bility) (Hector 2006). The burial is part obility) (Hector 2006). The burial is part o ssociated with an assemblage that fits tssociated with an assemblag es, and expedient flake tools). In contraes, and expedient flake tools). points, high proportions of formal lithipoints, high proportions of formal tions oons of ground stone tools. Prime examf ground stone tools. Prime exam 1978) on Naval Air Weapons Station on Naval Air Weapons Station and unfluted stemmed points and largd stemmed
r typical Paleoindian sites include the Kr typical Paleoindian sites i 680680—— a single component Great Basineda single component Great B round stone tools were rare while finely round stone tools were rare while finely et al. (2004) claimed that a bifacet al. (2004) claimed that a tive of typical Paleoindian otive of typical Paleoindia 2004). Termed San D2004). Termed San
st others in regst others in reg
tools, a tools, a
thth

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
31 January 2020
The large number of finished bifaces (i.e., projectile points and non-projectile blades), along with large numbers of formal flake tools at the Harris site complex, is very di fferent than nearly all other assemblages throughout the region, regardless of age. Warren et al. (2004) made this point, tabulating basic assemblage constituents for key early Holocene sites. Producing finely made bifaces and formal flake tools implies that relatively large amounts of time were spent for tool manufacture. Such a strategy contrasts with the expedient flake-based tools and cobble- core reduction strategy that typifies non-San Dieguito Archaic sites. It can be inferred from the uniquely high degree of San Dieguito assemblage formality that the Harris site complex represents a distinct economic strategy from non- San Dieguito assemblages.

San Dieguito sites are rare in the inland valleys, with one possible candidate, RIV-2798/H, located on the shore of Lake Elsinore. Excavations at Locus B at RIV-2798/H produc ed a toolkit consisting predominately of flaked stone tools, including crescents, points, and bifaces, and lesser amounts of groundstone tools, among other items (Grenda 1997). A calibrated and reservoir-corrected radiocarbon date from a shell produced a date of 6630 BC. Grenda (1997) suggested this site represents seasonal exploitation of lacustrine resources and small game and resembles coastal San Dieguito assemblages and spatial patterning.

If San Dieguito truly represents a distinct socioeconomic strategy from the non-San Dieguito Archaic processing regime, its rarity implies that it was not only short-lived, but that it was not as economically successful as the Archaic strategy. Such a conclusion would fit with other trends in Southern California deserts, where hunting-related tools were replaced by processing tools during the early Holocene (see Basgall and Hall 1990).

A
Archaic Period (8000 BC – AD 500)
The more than 2,500-year overlap between the presumed age of Paleoindian occupations and the Archaic period highlights the difficulty in defining a cultural chronology in Southern California. If San Dieguito is the only recognized Paleoindian component in the coastal Southern California , then the dominance of hunting tools implies that it derives from Great Basin adaptive strategies and is not necessarily a local adaptation. Warren et al. (2004) admitted as much, citing strong desert connections with San Dieguito. Thus, the Archaic pattern is the earliest local socioeconomic adaptation in the region (see Hale 2001, 2009).

The Archaic pattern, which has also been termed the Millingstone Horizon (among others), is relatively easy to define with assemblages that consist primarily of processing tools, such as millingstones, handstones, battered cobbles, heavy crude scrapers, incipient flake-based tools, and cobble-core reduction. These assemblages occur in all environments across the region with little variability in tool composition. Low assemblage variability over time and space among Archaic sites has been equated with cultural conservatism (see Basgall and Hall 1990; Byrd and Reddy 2002; Warren 1968; Warren et al. 2004). Despite enormous amounts of archaeological work at Archaic sites, little change in assemblage composition occurred until the bow and arrow was adopted around AD 500, as well as ceramics at approximately the same time (Griset 1996; Hale 2009). Even then, assemblage formality remained low. After the bow was adopted, small arrow points appear in large quantities and already low amounts of formal flake tools are replaced by increasing amounts of expedient flake tools. Similarly, shaped millingstones and handstones decreased in proportion relative to expedient, unshaped ground stone tools (Hale 2009). Thus, the terminus of the Archaic period is equally as hard to define as its beginning because basic assemblage constituents and patterns of manufacturing investment remain stable, complemented only by the addition of the bow and ceramics.

DRAFT
m them the
t economict econo
e, RIVe, RIV--2798/H, located on the2798/H, lo
consisting predominately ofconsisting predominat flaked roundstone tools, among other items (Grroundstone tools, among othe shell produced a date of 6630 BC. Grendashell produced a date of 6630 BC. Gr e resources and small game and resembe resources and small game and resemb mic strategy from the nongy from the n -San Dieguito
ed, but that it was not as economically sunot as
trends in Southern California deserts, wtrends in Southern California d early Holocene (see Basgall and Hall 19y Holocene (see Basgall and Hall p between the presumed age of Paleoinp between the presumed ag ning a cultural chronology in Southern Caning a cultural chronology in Sou the coastal Southern California, then tthe coastal Southern California, t sin adaptive strategies and is nin adaptive strategies and is ot nect nec iting strong desert connections with San trong desert connections with San daptation in the region (see Hale 2001, the region (see Hale 2001, c patternc pattern, which has also been termed , which has also been with assemblages that consist primarily with assemblages that consist primari es, heavy crude scrapers, incipient flakees, heavy crude scrapers, incipient flake ironments across the region with liironments across the region e among Archaic sites has beee among Archaic sites has
Warren 1968; Warre Warren 1968; Warre
ge in assemblagge in assemblag
t approximt approxim
eb oeb o

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
32 January 2020
LLate Prehistoric Period (AD 500-1769)
The period of time following the Archaic and before Ethnohistoric times (AD 1769) is commonly referred to as the Late Prehistoric (Rogers 1945; Wallace 1955; Warren et al. 2004); however, several other subdivisions continue to be used to describe various shifts in assemblage composition. In general, this period is defined by the addition of arrow points and ceramics, as well as the widespread use of bedrock mortars. The fundamental Late Prehistoric assemblage is very similar to the Archaic pattern, but includes arrow points and large quantities of fine debitage from producing arrow points, ceramics, and cremations. The appearance of mortars and pestles is difficult to place in time because most mortars are on bedrock surfaces. Some argue that the Ethnohistoric intensive acorn economy extends as far back as AD 500 (Bean and Shipek 1978). However, there is no substantial evidence that reliance on acorns, and the accompanying use of mortars and pestles, occurred before AD 1400. Millingstones and handstones persisted in higher frequencies than mortars and pestles until the last 500 years (Basgall and Hall 1990); even then, weighing the economic significance of millingstone-handstone versus mortar-pestle technology is tenuous due to incomplete information on archaeological assemblages.

3.2 Ethnographic Overview
The history of the Native American communities prior to the mid-1700s has largely been reconstructed through later mission-period and early ethnographic accounts. The first records of the Native American inhabitants of the region come predominantly from European merchants, missionaries, military personnel, and explorers. These brief, and generally peripheral, accounts were prepared with the intent of furthering respective colonial and economic aims and were combined with observations of the landscape. They were not intended to be unbiased accounts regarding the cultural structures and community prac tices of the newly encountered cultur al groups. The establishment of the missions in the region brought more extensive documentation of Native American communities, though these groups did not become the focus of formal and in-depth ethnographic study until the early twentieth century (Bean and Shipek 1978; Boscana 1846; Geiger and Meighan 1976; Harrington 1934; Laylander 2000; Sparkman 1908; White 1963).

The principal intent of these researchers was to record the precontact, culturally specific practices, ideologies, and languages that had survived the destabilizing effects of missionization and colonialism. This research, often understood as “salvage ethnography,” was driven by the understanding that traditional knowledge was being lost due to the impacts of modernization and cultural assimilation . Alfred Kroeber applied his “memory culture” approach (Lightfoot 2005: 32) by recording languages and oral histories within the region. Ethnographic research by Dubois, Kroeber, Harrington, Spier, and others during the early twentieth century seemed to indicate that traditional cultural practices and beliefs survived among local Native American communities.

It is important to note that even though there were many informants for these early ethnographies who were able to provide information from personal experiences about native life before the Europeans, a significantly large proportion of these informants were born after 1850 (Heizer and Nissen 1973); therefore, the documentation of pre-contact, aboriginal culture was being increasingly supplied by individuals born in California after considerable contact with Europeans. As Robert F. Heizer (1978) stated, this is an important issue to note when examining these ethnographies, since considerable culture change had undoubtedly occurred by 1850 among the Native American survivors of California.

Based on ethnographic information, it is believed that at least 88 different languages were spoken from Baja California Sur to the southern Oregon state border at th e time of Spanish contact (Johnson and Lorenz 2006, p.

DRAFT
damdam
e quantitie quan
s and pestles is s and p
nohistoric intensive aconohistoric
no substantial evidence thano substantial e
red before AD 1400. Millingstonered before AD 1400.
s until thes until last 500 years (Basgall andyears (B
oneone--handstone versus mortarhandstone versus mortar--pestle tecpestle semblages. semblag
iew
rior to the midrior to th -1700s has largely been rehas larg nts. The first records of the Native AmericThe first records of the Native Am hants, missionaries, military personnel, missionaries, military personnel, pared with the intent of furthering respecte intent of furthering respec the landscape. They he landscape. They were not intended twere not intended t ty practices of the newly encountered cty practices of the newly en more extensive documentation of Nativemore extensive documentation formal and informa -depth ethnographic study uepth ethnographic st Geiger and Meighan 1976; Harrington 19eiger and Meighan 1976; Harrington 19 of these researchers was to record the pse researchers was to record the p had survived the destabilizing effects the destabilizing effects s “salvage ethnography,”“salvage ethnography,”was driven by thewa acts of modernization and cultural assimacts of modernization and cultur ot 2005: 32) by recording languages andot 2005: 32) by recording languages a ber, Harrington, Spier, and others duringber, Harrington, Spier, and others during es and beliefs survived among locaes and beliefs survived amon t to note that even thot to note that even th
mation from pemation from pe
informaninforman
cucu

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
33 January 2020
34). The distribution of recorded Native American langua ges has been dispersed as a geographic mosaic across California through six primary language families (Golla 2007).

Victor Golla has contended that one can interpret the amount of variability within specific language groups as being associated with the relative “time depth” of the speaking populations (Golla 2007: 80) A large amount of variation within the language of a group represents a greater time depth then a group’s language with less internal diversity.

One method that he has employed is by drawing comparisons with historically documented changes in Germanic and Romantic language groups. Golla has observed that th e “absolute chronology of the internal diversification within a language family” can be correlated with archaeol ogical dates (2007:71). This type of interpretation is modeled on concepts of genetic drift and gene flows that are associated with migration and population isolation in the biological sciences.

The tribes of this area have traditionally spoken Takic languages that may be assigned to the larger Uto–Aztecan family (Golla 2007, p. 74). These groups include the Gabrielino (alternately Gabrieleño), Cahuilla, and Serrano.

Golla has interpreted the amount of internal diversity within these language-speaking communities to reflect a time depth of approximately 2,000 years. Other researchers have contended that Takic may have diverged from Uto– Aztecan ca. 2600 BC–AD 1, which was later followed by the diversification within the Takic speaking tribes, occurring approximately 1500 BC–AD 1000 (Laylander 2000).

G
Gabrielino (Gabrieleño)/Tongva
The archaeological record indicates that project site and vicinity was occupied by the Gabrieleño, who arrived in the Los Angeles Basin around 500 B.C. Surrounding cultural groups included the Chumash and Tataviam to the northwest, the Serrano and Cahuilla to the northeast, and the Juaneño and Luiseño to the southeast.

The name “Gabrieliño” o r “ Gabrieleño” denotes those people who were administered by the Spanish from the San Gabriel Mission, which included people from the Gabr ieleño area proper as well as other social groups (Bean and Smith 1978; Kroeber 1925). Therefore, in th e post-Contact period, the name does not necessarily identify a specific ethnic or tribal group. The names by which Native Americans in southern California identified themselves have, in some cases, been lost. Many modern Gabrieleño identify themselves as the Tongva (King 1994), within which there are a number of regional band s. Though the names “Tongva” or “Gabrieleño” are the most common names used by modern Native American groups, and are recognized by the Native American Heritage Commission, there are groups within the region that self-identify differently, such as the Gabrielino Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation. In order to be inclusive of the majority of tribal entities within the region, the name “Tongva” or “Gabrieleño” are used within this report.

Tongva lands encompassed the greater Los Angeles Basin and three Channel Islands, San Clemente, San Nicolas, and Santa Catalina. The Tongva established large, permanent villages in the fertile lowlands along rivers and streams, and in sheltered areas along the coast, stretching from the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains to the Pacific Ocean. A total tribal population has been estimated of at least 5,000 (Bean and Smith 1978), but recent ethnohistoric work suggests a number approaching 10,000 (O’Neil 2002). Houses constructed by the Tongva were large, circular, domed structures made of willow poles thatched with tule that could hold up to 50 people (Bean and Smith 1978). Other structures served as sweathouses, menstrual huts, ceremonial enclosures, and probably communal granaries. Cleared fields for races and games, such as lacrosse and pole throwing, were created adjacent to Tongva villages (M cCawley 1996). Archaeological sites composed of villages with various sized structures have been identified.

DRAFT
with with
mented chmented
gy of the internagy of th
:71). This type of inte:71). This
h migration and population ish migration and p
hat may be assigned to the larger Utohat may be assigned to the larger –A o (alternately Gabrielo (alternately Ga eño), Cahuilla, andlla, an hese languagehese la -speaking communities topeakin
ave contencontended that Takic may have divded that Ta
ed by the diversification within the Takdiversificatio
nder 2000).
at project sitee and vicinity was occupied and vicinity was occupie B.C. Surroundingng culturalcultural groups incinc
CahuillaCahuilla toto the northeast, and the Juaheast, a Gabrieleño” denotesGabrieleño” denot those peoplepeop wh hichhich includedin peopleeople from the Gabrielabrie
978; KroeberKroebe 1925).25). Therefore,Therefore, inin thethe ethnic or tribalribal group.group. The names byby ww
ave,ve, in in some casessome cases,, beenbeen lost. Many m hin which there are a number of regionahin which there are a number o mmon names used by modern Native Ammmon names used by modern Native A mission, there are groups within the regiomission, there are groups within the regio ss -- Kizh Nation. In order to be inclusKizh Nation. In order to be eleño” are used within this reeleño” are used within this ncompassedncompassed thethe g
aa TheThe TongTong
eredered

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
34 January 2020
The largest, and best documented, ethnographic Tongva village in the vicinity was that of Yanga (also known as Yaangna, Janga, and Yabit), which was in the vicinity of the downtown Los Angeles (McCawley 1996:56-57; NEA and King 2004). This village was reportedly first encountered by the Portola expedition in 1769. In 1771, Mission San Gabriel was established. Yanga provided a large number of the recruitments to this mission; however, following the founding of the Pueblo of Los Angeles in 1781, opportunities for local paid work became increasingly common, which had the result of reducing the number of Native American neophytes from the immediately surrounding area (NEA and King 2004). Mission records indicate that 179 Gabrieleno inhabitants of Yanga were recruited to San Gabriel Mission (King 2000; NEA and King 2004: 104). Based on this information, Yanga may have been the most populated village in the Western Gabrieleno territory. Second in size, and less thoroughly documented, the village of Cahuenga was located slightly closer, just north of the Cahuenga Pass.

Father Juan Crespi passed through the area near Yanga on August 2-3, 1769. The pertinent sections from his translated diary are provided here:

Sage for refreshment is very plentiful at all three rivers and very good here at the Porciúncula [the Los Angeles River]. At once on our reaching here, eight heathens came over from a good sized village encamped at this pleasing spot among some trees. They came bringing two or three large bowls or baskets half-full of very good sage with other sorts of grass seeds that they consume; all brought their bows and arrows but with the strings removed from the bows. In his hands the chief bore strings of shell beads of the sort that they use, and on reaching the camp they threw the handfuls of these beads at each of us. Some of the heathens came up smoking on pipes made of baked clay, and they blew three mouthfuls of smoke into the air toward each one of us. The Captain and myself gave them tobacco, and he gave them our own kind of beads, and accepted the sage from them and gave us a share of it for refreshment; and very delicious sage it is for that purpose.

We set out at a half past six in the morning from this pleasing, lush river and valley of Our Lady of Angeles of La Porciúncula. We crossed the river here where it is carrying a good deal of water almost at ground level, and on crossing it, came into a great vineyard of grapevines and countless rose bushes having a great many open blossoms, all of it very dark friable soil. Keeping upon a westerly course over very grass-grown, entirely level soils with grand grasses, on going about half a league we came upon the village belonging to this place, where they came out to meet and see us, and men, women, and children in good numbers, on approaching they commenced howling at us though they had been wolves, just as before back at the spot called San Francisco Solano. We greeted them and they wished to give us seeds. As we had nothing at hand to carry them in, we refused [Brown 2002:339-341, 343].

The Portola party passed westward through the La Brea Tar Pits area (CA-LAN-159) the following day. This was a known area of Native American use for hunting and the gathering of tar and other area-specific resources (Westec 1983). A pertinent excerpt from Father Juan Crespi’s August 3, 1769 diary entry is provided here:

The Captain told me that when they scouted here, in a ravine about half a league to the westward they came upon about forty springs of pitch, or tar, boiling in great surges up out of the ground, and saw very large swamps of this tar, enough to have caulked many ships. [Brown 2002:341] DRAFT
ediaedia
Yanga werYanga
Yanga may haveYanga
thoroughly documentedthoroughly
22--3, 1769. The pertinent sections from3, 1769. The pertinent se rs and very good here at the Porciúnculars and very good here at the Porciúncula e, eight heathens came over from a goght heathens cam
g some trees. They came bringing two ors. They cam
e with other sorts of grass seeds that theof grass
the strings removed from the bows. In hthe strings removed from the b ort that they use, and on reaching the hat they use, and on reaching th of us. Some of the heathens came up smme of the heathens came up sm e mouthfuls of smoke into the air toward f smoke into the air toward cco, and he gave them our own kind of cco, and he gave them our own kind of a share of it for refreshment; and very dea share of it for refreshment; alf past six in the mornalf past six in the mor ing from this pleasthis p orciúncula. We crossed the river here whrciúncula. We crossed the river here wh evel, and on crossing it, came into a grend on crossing it, came into a gre having a great many open blossoms, all ot many ope
e over very grasse over very gra -grown, entirely level sorown, en e came upon the village belonging to thie came upon the village belongin men, women, and children in good nmen, women, and children in good though they had been wolves, just though they had been wolves, just greeted them and they wished togreeted them and they wis used [Brown 2002:339used [Brown 2002:339--343
y passed westwy passed westw
e Americe Americ
erperp

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
35 January 2020
Upon leaving the La Brea Tar Pits, the Portola expedition continued westward, camping on August 4, 1769 near what is now the route Interstate 405 before heading northward into the mountains. Details of the day’s travels are provided below:

At a quarter past six in the morning we set out from this copious spring at the San Esteban Sycamores …. We pursued our way northwestward and on going about a quarter-league [0.85 mile], we came into a little flat hollow between small knolls, and then onward across level tablelands of dark friable soil….we turned west-northwestward an d on going two hours, all over level soil, came to the watering place: two springs rising at the foot of a high tableland, their origin being higher up on the large plain here….At this spot we came upon a village at the aforesaid tableland and as soon as we arrived and set up camp, six very friendly, compliant tractable heathens came over, who had their little houses roofed with grass, the first we have been seeing of this sort. They brought four or six bowls of the usual seeds and good sage which they presented to our Captain. On me they bestowed a good-sized string of the sort of beads they all have, made of white seashells and red ones, though not very bright-colored, that look to be coral. [Brown 2002:345-349] The name of this village referenced to be near the August 4, 1769 Portola camp is unknown, and would have been located approximately 3 miles from the named village near Santa Monica ( Kuruvunga) and 5 miles from Sa’anga near the mouth of Ballona Creek. Sa’anga, likely within a mile of the present project site, has also been commonly referred to as Guaspet or Guashna, (NEA and King 2004), Saan (Kroeber 1925), or Saa’anga or Waachnga (McCawley 1996). Ethnohistoric research completed by John Johnson (1988) pertaining to the inhabitants of San Clemente Island and Santa Catalina Island has indicated that there were many marriage ties between these islands and this village in the vicinity of the Ballona wetlands. Mission records indicate that a total of 95 neophytes came from this village; 87 of these individuals at Mission San Gabriel and the remaining eight at Mission San Fernando (NEA and King 2004). These records further suggest th at marriage was common with the surrounding outside villages, but perhaps most often occurring with members of the large village of Yanga .

The Tongva subsistence economy was centered on gathering and hunting. The surrounding environment was rich and varied, and the tribe exploited mountains, foothill s, valleys, deserts, riparian, estuarine, and open and rocky coastal eco-niches. Like that of most native Californians, acorns were the staple food (an established industry by the time of the early Intermediate Period). Acorns were supplemented by the roots, leaves, seeds, and fruits of a wide variety of flora (e.g., islay, cactus, yucca, sages, and agave). Fresh water and saltwater fish, shellfish, birds, reptiles, and insects, as well as larg e and small mammals, were also consumed (Bean and Smith 1978: 546; Kroeber 1925; McCawley 1996).

A wide variety of tools and implements were used by the Tongva to gather and collect food resources. These included the bow and arrow, traps, nets, blinds, throwing sticks and slings, spears, harpoons, and hooks.

Groups residing near the ocean used oceangoing plank canoes and tule balsa canoes for fishing, travel, and trade between the mainland and the Channel Islands (McCawley 1996).

Tongva people processed food with a variety of tools, including hammerstones and anvils, mortars and pestles, manos and metates, strainers, leaching baskets and bowls, knives, bone saws, and wooden drying racks. Food was consumed from a variety of vessels. Catalina Island steatite was used to make ollas and cooking vessels (Blackburn 1963; Kroeber 1925; McCawley 1996).

DRAFT
eagueagu
s level tas level
all over level soall ove
their origin being highetheir origin
oresaid tableland and as soooresaid tablelan
ble heathens came over, who had ble heathens came ove
eing of this sort. They brought four or eing of this sort. They brought presepresented to our Captain. On me they nted to our Captain. On me all have, made of white seashells and rall have, made of white seashells and r coral. coral. [Brown 2002:3[Brown 2002:3454 -349]
ust 4, 1769 Portola camp is unknown, a9 Portola cam
age near Santa Monica (onica (Kuruvunga) and
y within a mile of the present projwithin a mile of the present pr ect site and King 2004), King 2004), SaanSa (Kroeber 1925)ber 192 completed by John Johnson (1988) pered by John Johnson (1988) per and has indicated that there were many ated that there were many Ballona wetlands. Mission records indicBallona wetlands. Mission records indic dividdividuals at Mission San Gabriel and theuals at Mission San Gab e records further suggest that marriagee records further suggest that m t often occurring with members of the lat often occurring with members of the ence economyeconom was centeredwas centered onon gathegathe and the tribe exploitedexploited mountains, foot
ecoeco--niches.niches. LikeL thathat ofof most native
yy the time ofthe tim thethe early Intermediate Perioearly Intermediat ff aa widewid variety of floraflora (e.g.,(e islay,slay, cac fish,fish, birds,bi reptiles, and insects,insec as wewe 546; Kroeber 1925;546; Kro McCawleyCawl 19
yy ofof toolstoo and implemimple
ww andand arrow,arrow,
arar thethe ococ
inin

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
36 January 2020
At the time of Spanish contact, the basis of Tongva re ligious life was the Chinigch inich cult, centered on the last of a series of heroic mythological figures. Chinigchinich gave instruction on laws and institutions, and also taught the people how to dance, the primary religious act for this society. He later withdrew into heaven, where he rewarded the faithful and punished those who disobeyed his laws (Kroeber 1925). The Chinigchinich religion seems to have been relatively new when the Spanish arrived. It was spreading south into the Southern Takic groups even as Christian missions were being built and may represent a mixture of native and Christian belief and practices (McCawley 1996).

Deceased Tongva were either buried or cremated, with inhumation more common on the Channel Islands and the neighboring mainland coast and cremation predominating on the remainder of the coast and in the interior (Harrington 1942; McCawley 1996). Cremation ashes have been found in archaeological contexts buried within stone bowls and in shell dishes (Ashby and Winterbourne 1966), as well as scattered among broken ground stone implements (Cleland et al. 2007). Archaeological data such as these correspond with ethnographic descriptions of an elaborate mourning ceremony that included a wide variety of offerings, including seeds, stone grinding tools, otter skins, baskets, wood tools, shell beads, bone and shell ornaments, and projectile points and knives. Offerings varied with the sex and status of the deceased (Johnston 1962; McCawley 1996; Reid 1926).

At the behest of the Spanish missionaries, cremation essentially ceased during the post-Contact period (McCawley 1996).

3.3 Historic Period Overview
Post-Contact history for the State of California is genera lly divided into three periods: the Spanish Period (1769– 1821), Mexican Period (1821–1848), and American Peri od (1846–present). Although Spanish, Russian, and British explorers visited the area for brief periods between 1529 and 1769, the Spanish Period in California begins with the establishment in 1769 of a settlement at San Diego and the founding of Mission San Diego de Alcalá, the first of 21 missions constructed between 1769 and 1823. Independence from Spain in 1821 marks the beginning of the Mexican Period, and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, ending the Mexican–American War, signals the beginning of the American Period when California became a territory of the United States.

S
Spanish Period
Spanish explorers made sailing expeditions along the coast of southern California between the mid-1500s and mid- 1700s. In search of the legendary Northwest Passage, Juan Rodríquez Cabríllo stopped in 1542 at present-day San Diego Bay. With his crew, Cabríllo explored the shorelines of present Catalina Island as well as San Pedro and Santa Monica Bays. Much of the present California and Oregon coastline was mapped and recorded in the next half- century by Spanish naval officer Sebastián Vizcaíno. Vizcaíno ’s crew also landed on Santa Catalina Island and at San Pedro and Santa Monica Bays, giving each location its long-standing name. The Spanish crown laid claim to California based on the surveys conducted by Cabríllo and Vizcaíno (Bancroft 1885; Gumprecht 1999).

More than 200 years passed before Spain began the colonization and inland exploration of Alta California. The 1769 overland expedition by Captain Gaspar de Portolá marks the beginning of California’s Historic period, occurring just after the King of Spain installed the Franciscan Order to direct religious and colonization matters in assigned territories of the Americas. With a band of 64 soldiers, missionaries, Baja (lower) California Native Americans, and Mexican civilians, Portolá established the Presidio of San Diego, a fortified military outpost, as the first Spanish settlement in Alta California. In July of 1769, while Portolá was exploring southern California, DRAFT
ativativ
monmon onon thet Channe
ainderainder of thethe coastco and in th
in archaeologicalarchaeological contextscon buried
ellell asas scattereds amongg brokenbroke ground s
eseese correspondco with ethnographicgraphic desc
rietyriety ofof offerings,s, including seeds, stonston
nene andand shell ornaments,rname and project
eceasedsed (Johnston(Johnston 1962;19 McCawley 19
essentially ceasedceased during the duri post-Conta
d Overviewverview
f California is generally divided into threeCalifornia is generally divided into three 1848), and American Period (18461848), and American Period –pr ea for brief periods between 1529 and 1ea for brief periods between 15 1769 of a settl1769 o ement at San Diego and tment at San Diego a structed between 1769 and 1823. Indetructed between 1769 and 1823. Inde od, and the signing of the Treaty of Guadd the signing of the Treaty of Guad beginning of the American Period when Cthe American Period when C rrii
D
oo
D
dd
D
ish explorers made sailing expeditions alish explorers made sailing expeditions al s. In search of the legendary Northwes. In search of the legendary N y. With his crew, Cabríllo explory. With his crew, Cabríllo ex s. Much of the present s. Much of the presen
nish naval officer nish naval officer
nta Monicanta Monica
e sue su

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
37 January 2020
Franciscan Fr. Junípero Serra founded Mission San Diego de Alcalá at Presidio Hill, the first of the 21 missions that would be established in Alta California by the Spanish and the Franciscan Order between 1769 and 1823.

The Portolá expedition first reached the present-day boundaries of Los Angeles in August 1769, thereby becoming the first Europeans to visit the area. Father Crespi named “the campsite by the river Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Angeles de la Porciúncula” or “Our Lady the Queen of the Angels of the Porciúncula.” Two years later, Friar Junípero Serra returned to the valley to establish a Catholic mission, the Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, on September 8, 1771 (Kyle 2002). In 1795 Fr. Fermin Lasuen ordered a new report on possible mission sites, and the Francisco Reyes Rancho was ultimately chosen as the new mission site, with Mission San Fernando Rey de España being formally founded in 1797 (Perkins 1957). Shortly thereafter, many of the lo cal Gabrielino and Tataviam people were removed from their homeland, relocated to the mission, and their native lifeways taken away.

M
Mexican Period
A major emphasis during the Spanish Period in California was the construction of missions and associated presidios to integrate the Native American population into Christianity and communal enterprise. Incentives were also provided to bring settlers to pueblos or towns, but just three pueblos were established during the Spanish Period, only two of which were successful and remain as California cities (San José and Los Angeles). Several factors kept growth within Alta California to a minimum, including the threat of foreign invasion, political dissatisfaction, and unrest among the indigenous population. After more than a decade of intermittent rebellion and warfare, New Spain (Mexico and the California territory) won independence from Spain in 1821. In 1822, the Mexican legislative body in California ended isolationist policies designed to protect the Spanish monopoly on trade, and decreed California ports open to foreign merchants (Dallas 1955).

Extensive land grants were established in the interior during the Mexican Period, in part to increase the population inland from the more settled coastal areas where the Spanish had first concentrated their colonization efforts.

Rancho San Vicente y Santa Monica, where the project site is located, was granted by Governor Juan Alvarado to Francisco Sepulveda in 1838. The Rancho encompasses present day Santa Monica, Brentwood, Mandeville Canyon, portions of the Santa Monica Mountains, and parts of West Los Angeles (Hoffman 1862: 63).

During the supremacy of the ranchos (1834–1848), landowners largely focused on the cattle industry and devoted large tracts to grazing. Cattle hides became a primary so uthern California export, providing a commodity to trade for goods from the east and other areas in the United States and Mexico. The number of nonnative inhabitants increased during this period because of the influx of ex plorers, trappers, and ranchers associated with the land grants. The rising California population contributed to the introduction and rise of diseases foreign to the Native American population, who had no associated immunities.

American Period
War in 1846 between Mexico and the United States precipitated the Battle of Chino, a clash between resident Californios and Americans in the San Bernardino area. The Mexican-American War ended with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, ushering California into its American Period.

California officially became a state with the Compromise of 1850, which also designated Utah and New Mexico (with present-day Arizona) as U.S. Territories (Waugh 2003). Horticulture and livestock, based primarily on cattle as the currency and staple of the rancho system, continued to dominate the southern California economy through 1850s. The Gold Rush began in 1848, and with the influx of people seeking gold, cattle were no longer desired DRAFT
iar Jiar J
mber 8, 17mber 8
e Francisco Reye Franc
España being formallEspaña b
Tataviam people were remoTataviam peopl
away. away.
the construction of missions the construction of mi and associaa y and communal enterprise. Incentives wed communal enterpr blos were established during the Spanishestablished d
s (San José and Los Angeles). Several facLos Ange
of foreign invasion, political dissatisfactiof foreign invasion, political di ade of intermittent rebellion and warfareof intermittent rebellion and war m Spain in 1821. In 1822, the Mexican legn 1821. In 1822, the Mexican leg the Spanish monopoly on trade, and decmonopoly on trade, and de tablished in the interior during the Mexictablished in the interior during ed coastal ed coa areas where the Spanish has where the Spani Santa Monica, where the project site is lanta Monica, where the project site is a in 1838. The Rancho encompasses 1838. The Rancho encompasses of the Santa Monica Mountains, and paa Monica Mountains, and pa supremacy of the ranchos (1834supremacy of the ranchos (1834–1848) acts to gacts to razing. Cattle hides became a pttle hides became a oods from the east and other areas in toods from the east and other areas in t sed during this period because of tsed during this period becau e rising California populatione rising California popula pulation, who had no apulation, who had no a

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
38 January 2020
mainly for their hides but also as a source of meat and other goods. During the 1850s cattle boom, rancho vaqueros drove large herds from southern to northern California to feed that region’s burgeoning mining and commercial boom. Cattle were at first driven along major trails or roads such as the Gila Trail or Southern Overland Trail, then were transported by trains when available. The cattle boom ended for southern California as neighbor states and territories drove herds to northern California at reduced prices. Operation of the huge ranchos became increasingly difficult, and droughts severely reduced their productivity (Cleland 2005).

H
Historical Overview of Pasadena
Like many cities in the San Gabriel Valley, the City of Pa sadena’s history is linked to the Mission San Gabriel and the subsequent privatization of ranchos once owned by the Mission in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. By 1827, the Mission ranchos began to be sold off and deve loped independent of the Mission. The first rancho sold was Rancho San Pasqual in 1827, followed by Rancho Santa Anita and Rancho San Rafael. Portions of these three ranchos would later become the City of Pasadena.

In 1874 Benjamin Davis Wilson, owner of a portion of the Rancho San Pasqual, negotiated a deal with Daniel Berry from Indiana. Berry, like many Americans at the time, was caught up in the concept of Manifest Destiny and sought land in the west with his fellow farmers from Indiana. He hoped to cultivate the warm climate crops that were not possible to grow in his home state. Berry secured a deal with Wilson for a portion of the Rancho San Pasqual and immediately surveyed and subdivided the property into 100 parcels. Quick development of the parcels and the establishment of a water conveyance system made the area conducive to farming and development. By 1875, the name Pasadena was chosen for the area. Growth and development continued rapidly in Pasadena and by 1880 the population had reached 383.

Growth and development continued in Pasadena throughout the 1880s and like other areas of Southern California, Pasadena experienced a land speculation boom. The land speculation boom was a result of the development of the railroad in Southern California and cities like Pasadena saw increases in land values with land selling for $1,000 per acre in 1886. The boom of the 1880s gave way to huge property subdivisions and population increases in Pasadena, as evidenced by the fact that more than 400 new buildings were constructed during this time(Grimes 2010; O’Conner 1993).

During the 1880s, Pasadena also became a desirable destination and greatly benefited from the tourism industry and grew to support temporary visitors. Events like the Tournament of Roses parade and East-West football game, which began in 1902 as the first of its kind in the nation introduced visitors to a mild winter climate and the beauty of the city. By 1900, Pasadena was supporting approximately 60,000 visitors during the winter months. The once agricultural community quickly became a tourist destination, which led to the development of the commercial center, but also the hotel industry and other supporting service industries for seasonal visitors (HRG 2007; O’Conner 1993).

In addition to becoming a tourist destination, advancements in transportation including rail and trolley lines, made Pasadena a desirable place to live outside of the city of Los Angeles. Although the population boom precipitated the need for residential buildings, it also created a need for a more substantial commercial district in Pasadena.

Colorado Boulevard became the main commercial thoroughfare with subsequent development on streets intersecting Colorado Boulevard like Fair Oaks Avenue and Raymond Avenue (Grimes 2010; HRG 2007).

DRAFT
inked to the Mission San Gainked to the Mi
eighteenth and nineteenth centur eighteenth and ninet
endent of the Mission. The first ranchoendent of the Mission. The f and Ranchand Ra o San Rafael. Portions of thesrtions o
Rancho San Pasqual, negotiated a deal wcho San Pasqual, ne as caught up in the concept of Manifest up in the con
a. He hoped to cultivate the warm climacultivate
d a deal with Wilson for a portion d a deal with Wilson for a port of the operty into 100 parcels. Quick developerty into 100 parcels. Quick deve em made the area conducive to farming e the area conducive to farming rea. Growth and development continuedand development continue inued in Pasadena throughout the 1880inued in Pasadena throughout and speculation boom. The land speculaand speculation boom. The land sp California and cities like Pasadena saw iCalifornia and cities like Pasadena saw he boom of the 1880s gave wayom of the 1880s gave way to huto hu denced by the fact that more than 400 he fact that more than 400 er 1993). er 1993).
he 1880s, Pasadena also became a deshe 1880s, Pasadena also became a d grew to support temporary visitors. Eventgrew to support temporary visitors. Event began in 1902 as the first of its kindbegan in 1902 as the first of . By 1900, Pasadena was su. By 1900, Pasadena was
community quickly beccommunity quickly be
the hotel induthe hotel indu

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
39 January 2020
By the 1890s, the population of the City reached 4,882 and expansion from the central city core led to development in all directions. Population increases and continued increases in tourism led to expanded cultural and social services in the city including an opera house, firehouse, and public library. The most remarkable institutions from the 1890s however, were the Tournament of Roses in 1890 and California Institute of Technology in 1891 (which became Caltech). Transportation also improved greatly du ring the 1890s with the electric streetcar service from Los Angeles to Pasadena established in 1895. The social and technological growth of the City in the 1890s led to the annexation of East Pasadena in 1904 and North Pasadena in 1906 (Grimes 2010; HRG 2007; O’Conner 1993).

Architectural history development patterns in Pasadena ran parallel to the population growth and development going on in the late 1800s. By the 1880s, large mansions began to emerge and prominent architects began to design homes for the wealthy residents of the City. One of the most significant movements of the time seen in Pasadena is the Arts and Crafts Movement, which dominated the architectural development of Southern California for years to come. Leading the movement in Pasadena were Charles and Henry Greene, who revolutionized the architectural development of Southern California with their high style California Bungalows. Population growth and development also warranted a switch in Pasadena from only single-family residential living to higher density urban options. Pulling from the traditions of Greene and Greene, the Bungalow Court emerged to meet the growing housing needs of Pasadena. The Bungalow Court became a modern for middle class architecture throughout Southern California and provided solutions to housing issues for many years to come (Grimes 2010; HRG 2007; Makinson 1977).

Technology was also increasingly important at the turn of the century and Pasadena like other cities saw the influence of the motor vehicle start to change the City’s landscape and development. Pasadena embraced the automobile and by 1915 there was one automobile for every four residents of the City, which was significantly higher than other cities in the United States. Growing dependency on automobiles led to major thoroughfares like Colorado Boulevard developing to support the new industry with numerous car dealerships and related services.

Infrastructure projects also began during the early years of the twentieth century with large- scale projects like the Colorado Street bridge in 1913, which connected the east and west sides of the Arroyo Seco. Subsequent road constructions and bridge constructions continued in the 1920s and 1930s to support the influx of people to Pasadena and California (HRG 2007; O’Conner 1993).

Like other cities in the 1920s, Pasadena saw another population boom. The population of the city began the decade at 45,000 and ended the decade in 1930 with a population of 76,000. Pasadena’s development at this time was largely influenced by the City Beautiful Movement and this period of growth led to the erection of the City Hall building. As seen in the previous population boom, Pasadena also experienced cultural expansion during this time with the erection of the Pasadena Playhouse in 1925 and the Rose Bowl Stadium in 1922. Despite these grand additions to the City in the 1920s, the City was also effected by the Great Depression and experienced a brief economic downturn. The Great Depression marked a slower economic period in Pasadena, but the city favored well in comparison to other cities throughout California. One of the hardest hit industries in Pasadena at the time was the tourism industry, as many people lacked the money for extravagant vacations and resorts. By the late 1930s the tourism industry was devastated and most of the resort hotels and amenities were closed (O’Conner 1993).

Although the post-war and depression years marked a bleak time in American history, the shift in architectural design during this period forever changed the American landscape. The work of early Modernists like Richard Neutra and Rudolph M. Schindler set the stage for Modernism to grow in Los Angeles with their use of International Style.

The International Style combined economical materials, forward thinking and innovation. Important architects like DRAFT
he Cihe Ci
HRG 2007 HRG 2
opulation growth and dopulation g
ge and prominent architects ge and prominen
gnificant movements of the time segnificant movements o itectural development of Southern Califoitectural development of Sou rles and Henry Greene, who revolutionirles and Henry Greene, who revolu styl style California Bungalows. Population ge California Bungalows. Population y singlesingle-family residential living to higher sidenti the Bungalow Court emerged to meet tungalow Court em he modern for middle class architecture tmiddle cla
s for many years to come (Grimes 2010s for many years to come ant at the turn of the century and Pase turn of the century and Pas o change the City’s landscape and deveCity’s landscape and dev s one automobile for everys one automobile for every four residen nited States. Growing dependency on aunited States. Growing depend ng to support the new industry with numng to support the new industry o began during the early years of the two began during the early years of the e in 1913, which connected the east ann 1913, which connected the east an bridge constructions continued in the constructions continued in the alifornia (HRG 2007; O’Conner 1993). ornia (HRG 2007; O cities in the 1920s, Pasadena saw anothcities in the 1920s, Pasadena saw 00 and ended the decade in 1930 with 00 and ended the decade in 1930 wit y influenced by the City Beautiful Movy influenced by the City Beautiful Mov g. As seen in the pg. As see revious populats po
ection of the Pasadena Plaection of the Pasadena
he City in the 1920she City in the 1920
urn. The Great urn. The Great
her citiesher cities
smsm

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
40 January 2020
Irving Gill, Frank Lloyd Wright, and Harwell Hamilton Harris made significant contributions to the Modernist movement in California (HRG 2007; O’Conner 1993).

The importance of innovation and forward thinking worked well for Pasadena once the United States entered World War II. Resort era hotels remaining in the city were converted to military functions and with Caltech and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) research and development going toward the war effort, Pasadena was revived.

Innovation and forward thinking also became a huge factor in the housing market once the war concluded as there was an influx of returning soldiers who required housing. Government agencies like the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) provided instructions for developers and builders for the best ways to deal with the population boom. They stressed the importance of proper planning, mass produced materials, and small house types.

Following the war, these ideas were heavily implemented throughout the United States.

Victory in World War II also ushered in a new era of hope and prosperity for the United States and from an architectural perspective, designers and architects embraced this optimism and saw it as a chance to move design forward. The focus on economical materials started by the early Modernists had a resurgence, as did the mass production of materials perfected during the war years. The other factor that became so important was the relationship between the automobile and commercial an d residential living. New technologies and population increases made automobiles more prevalent than ever, and architectural development moved ahead, making Pasadena a key location for these modern movements (HRG 2007).

In the 1940s and 1950s, new industries including manufacturing and science companies came to the city, the population continued to boom, and the city developed at a rapid speed. Culture remained a high priority in Pasadena during this time of growth and development with the Pasadena Playhouse and the Pasadena Art Museum. However, this growth and development came with a host of logistical problems as the city began to run out of space and experienced major issues with traffic congestion. For these reasons, many industries felt they could no longer grow and expand in Pasadena and they sought land elsewhere.

The City of Pasadena responded to this industrial exodus with the establishment of the Chamber of Commerce in 1959 and the formation of a redevelopment agency. Attracting new forms of business was key for Pasadena and the first step in preserving the vast historical resources of the city. The primary business district moved east of Fair Oaks and Colorado leaving the downtown full of empty storefronts and dilapidation. The older portions of the city constructed pre-1929 experienced high levels of white flight, where middle-income families moved out and low- income families moved in. In 1969, the Pasadena Art Museum of Modern Art (now the Norton Simon Museum of Art) opened while the renowned Pasadena Playhouse closed and was sold at auction (HRG 2007; City of Pasadena 2019).

Pasadena began to experience a period of economic revitalization at the start of the 1970s. Plans were made for the construction of the Foothill and Long Beach Freeways that would link Pasadena to other major freeways to the east, west, and south. Old Pasadena was slated for demolition in 1971 under the city’s Central District Improvement Plan despite strong opposition to save it. Groups like the Pasadena Development Agency and Pasadena Heritage worked to protect the architectural history of the city, including Old Pasadena, and bring back economic stability.

Large corporations began to relocate their headquarters to Pasadena. Development restarted with the construction of the Conference Center, the Plaza Pasadena Mall, condominiums, office space, and commercial buildings. In 1979, the city passed the Urban Conservation Overlay Zone, which saved the historic structures of Old Pasadena from demolition (City of Pasadena 2019; Old Pasadena 2016).

DRAFT
PaPa
e the war e the w
cies like the Fcies lik
est ways to deal with thest ways to
d materialsd materials ,, and small houand
United States. United
prosperity for the United Sprosperity for the United S tates and ftates is optimism and saw it as a chance to mois optimism and saw it as a chance to m early Modernists had a resurgence, as early Modernists had s. The other factor that became so ime other factor tha al and residential living. New technologdential living
n ever, and ar chitectural development tectura
ements (HRG 2007). ments (HR
including manufacturing and science cng manufacturing and science c city developed at a rapid speed. Culture rd at a rapid speed. Culture opment with the Pasadena Playhouse anpment with the Pasadena Playhouse an ame with a host of ame with a ho logistical gistical problems a h traffic congestion. For these reasonsh traffic congestion. For these re , m and they sought land elsewhere. and they sought land elsewhere. a responded to this industronded to this industrial exodus wiial exodus wi rmation of a redevelopment agency. Attrredevelopment agency. Attr n preserving the vast historical resourcesn preserving the vast histo Colorado leaving the downtown full of emColorado leaving the downtown f cted prected pr -1929 experienced high levels erienced high levels me families moved in. me fam In 1969, the Pasa1969, the Pasa enedened while the renowned Pasadenawhile the renowned Pas n to experience an to experience a
the Fooththe Footh
OldOld

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
41 January 2020
Between 1980 and 1990, the population of Pasadena increased by 11% and with the increase in population came a surge in development and ethnic diversity. In 1980, a charter amendment approved by voters changed Pasadena’s election system to district only elections allowing for more diversity in the local government. In 1993, the Board of Directors changed their name to the City Council and a mayor was elected on a rotating basis from the senior City Councilmembers. Throughout the 1990s, Pasadena continued to experience civic beautification campaigns including the 1993 Old Pasadena Streetscape and Alleyways Project. Newly installed parking meters in Old Pasadena and a borrowed $5 million payed for the construction of new sidewalks, street furniture, trees, and lighting. The city turned the alleys info functional walkways that granted easy access to restaurants and shops. Old Pasadena boomed and encouraged other business districts to install parking meters in order to finance public improvements. In 2002, the Los Angeles County Metro’s Gold Line reopened Pasadena for rapid transit. High- density condominiums began to be constructed throughout the city, which only increased the city’s population (Shoup 2018; City of Pasadena 2019; Old Pasadena 2016).

3.4 Project Site History
DDevelopment History of Green Street
In the 1880s Colorado Boulevard was the main commercial thoroughfare in Pasadena. Running parallel to, and one block south of Colorado Boulevard was a six block long street named East and West Kansas Street. Kansas Street began at Vernon Avenue to the west and ended at North Marengo Avenue to the east. The buildings located on East Kansas Street were primarily single-family dwellings, with multiple buildings located on the same large lot.

The buildings located on West Kansas Street were a combination of residential and commercial buildings. By 1888, the western end of Kansas Street had several commercial properties including a hardware store, tin shop, upholstering shop, and offices. The 1894 Sanborn Map shows the construction of the Hotel Green at the corner of East Kansas and South Raymond Avenue. During this period , Colorado Boulevard was almost entirely developed, resulting in new commercial development to the north and south (Sanborn 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1894).

By 1903, East and West Kansas Street was renamed East and West Green Street and extended to seven blocks from North Pasadena Avenue to the west and North Euclid Avenue to the east. At the eastern end of the street, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway and Southern Pacific Company ran through East Green Street and both had stops at the lumberyard located on Green Street between South Raymond Avenue and South Broadway. The Hotel Green continued to expand and the amount of commercial and residential properties along Green Street had almost doubled since 1888. The 1931 Sanborn Map shows Green Street as extending 24 blocks from North Orange Grove to the west and South Hill Avenue to the east. Development of commercial, residential, and institutional properties continued to grow and by this time, Green Street had established itself as its own commercial district. This district continued to expand during the 1950s with the majority of open lots being filled in and density increasing (Sanborn 1903, 1910, 1931, 1951).

Building 1: 740-750 East Green Street (1963)
Historic aerial photographs and maps indicate that througho ut the course of its history, this building has largely retained its original scale and massing. For instance, in the 1952, 1953 and 1956 aerials, the property at 740-750 East Green Street displays a thin rectangular building. By 1964, the building is replaced by the current building, which is consistent with its 1963 date of construction. (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019).

DRAFT
nstansta
s, street fus, stree
ss to restaurantsss to re
g meters in order to fing meters in
ned Pasadena for rapid traned Pasadena fo n
hich only increased the city’s popuhich only increased the commercial thoroughfare in Pasadena.commercial thoroughfare in a six block long street named x block long street named East and East a W and ended at North Maded at North Marengo Avenuerengo Avenue toto ngle-family dwellings, with multipledwellings, with multiple buildbui s Street were a combination of residentiombination of residenti eet had several commercial propertieseet had several commercia s. The 1894 Sanborn Map shows the cons. The 1894 Sanborn Map show aymond Avenue. During this periodaymond Avenue. During this period,, Colo rcial rcial development to the development to the north and soutnorth and sou d West Kansas Street was renamed Eansas Street was renamed Ea sadena Avenue to the west and North Euadena Avenue to the we opeka and Santa Fe Ropeka and Santa Fe ailwayway and Southeand the lumberyard located on Green Streetthe lumberyard located on Green Stre n continued to expand and the amount on continued to expand and the amount o d since 18d since 88. The 1931 Sanborn MSan
st and South Hill Avenue to thst and South Hill Avenue to grow and by this grow and by this time,time
and during the 1and during the 1
1951)1951)..

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
42 January 2020
Archival research found that Lane and Schlick originally designed the building for Rosay Investments Corporation in 1963. City Directory research, indicates that the buildi ng was an office building throughout its history with multiple tenants, addresses, and suite numbers. City Di rectory and map research lists the following tenants from the 1960s until 2019: Sherwin Williams Paint Company; Paine, Webber, Jackson, and Curtis; and Thomas R Capehart. Subsequent years in City Directories show th at the building continued to change tenants including Remax; Triecta Fit; Fred Astaire; and A1A Topsoil in more recent years.

B
Building 2: 770-784 East Green Street (1956)
Historic aerial photographs and maps indicate in the 1952, 1953, 1956 aerial photographs, the property at 770- 784 East Green Street displays three small structures running north to south along the length of the property. The 1964 aerial photograph displays the replacement of these structures with a square plan commercial building, which is consistent with the 1956 date of construction listed on the original building permit. (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019).

Archival research found that architect William Leo Rudolph originally designed the two-story office building, called the Wilhite Building in 1956 for the Wilhite Trust of which F. Dane Wilhite was the trustee. The 11,400 square foot building and the land cost $200,000 and featured a large decorative panel of Italian tile veneer (Figure 3). Research indicates that the Prudential Insurance Company were the first tenants of the building upon its completion (LAT 1955b). Archival research, including City Directory research, indicates that the building was an office building throughout its history with multiple tenants, addresses, and suite numbers. City Directory entries for the property lists the following tenants for the office building: Pruden tial Insurance Company of America; Mitchum, Jones, and Templeton Incorporated, and State Farm. Subsequent years in City Directories show that the building continued to change tenants frequently.

Figure 3. 770-784 East Green Street architectural drawing, 1955, Los Angeles Times DRAFT
rial photographs, the properrial photographs
uth along the length of the properth along the length o ith a square plan commercial building, with a square plan commercia alal building permit. build (NETR 2019;019; UCSB 2U
riginally designed the riginally designed the two-story office bub F. Dane Wilhite was the trustee. The 11,ane Wilhite was the ge decorative panel of Italian tile veneer (ive panel of It were the first tenants of the building upants of
tory research, indicates that the buildintory research, indicates that t addresses, and suite numbersresses, and suite numbers. City Dire. City D uilding: Prudential Insurance Company oPrudential Insurance Company o m. Subsequent years in City Directories ent years in City Directories

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
43 January 2020
BBuilding 3: 790 East Green Street (1967)
Historic aerial photographs and maps indicate that the history of the subject property pre-dates the current building located at 790 East Green Street. In the 1952, 1953, 1956, and 1964 aerials the property at 790 East Green Street is vacant and then paved by 1956 to be a small corner parking lot. However, by the 1972 aerial photograph an irregularly shaped building appears on the lot, which is consistent with the 1967 date of construction (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019).

Archival research found that contractor Evald C. Moller originally designed the building for K. Robey and E. Messer in 1967. Archival research, including City Directory research, indicates that the building was an office building throughout its history with multiple tenants, addresses, and suite numbers. The first City Directory entry for the property lists the following tenants for the office building: Marble Mortgage Company; U.S. Life Systems Corporation; and United California Bank. Subsequent years in City Directories show that the building continued to change tenants.

Building 4: 111 South Hudson Avenue (1951)
Historic aerial photographs and maps indicate that the current building at 111 South Hudson Avenue first appears in a 1952 aerial photography, which is consistent with the 1951 date of construction (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019).

The contractors the George W. Carter Company constructed the building at 111 South Hudson Avenue in 1951 as the new Pasadena branch office for the State Board of Equalization for $125,000 (Figure 4). The building was 8,000 square feet and designed by Cejay Parsons and Associates. Its original purpose was to serve as the headquarters for both the sales tax and liquor control divisions for the Pasadena sub district of the State agency, which covered the northeast corner of Los Angeles County (LAT 1951).

Figure 4. 111 South Hudson Ave architectural drawing, 1951, Los Angeles Times te te
uilding for uilding fo K. Robey a
at the building was an offict the building w
ers. The first City Directory entry ers. The first City Dire age Company; U.S. Life Systems Corporaage Company; U.S. Life Syste s show that the building continued to s show that the building continue he current building at 111 South Hudsoning at 1
t with the 1951 date of constructiont with the 1951 date of const (NE pany constructed the building at 1onstructed the buildin 11 So11 So e State Board of Equalization for $ard of Equalization for $ 12512 y Cejay Parsons and Associates. Its os and Associates. Its o ax and liquor control divisions for the Paax and liquor control division orner of Los Angeles County (LAT 1951).orner of Los Angeles County (L

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
44 January 2020
BBuilding 5: 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue (1951)
Historic aerial photographs and maps indicate that the current building at 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue first appears in a 1952 aerial photography, which is consistent with the 1951 date of construction (NETR 2019; UCSB 2019).

Archival research indicates that the building at 118 South Oak Knoll was constructed in 1951 for $55,000 as the area’s Community Service Center, with special bequest funds rather than charitable contributions. Architect Curtis Chambers designed the building. The family of Joseph M. and Irene C. Hixon, and the estates of Ella B. DeLyons and Walter Davis made bequests for the building. The cent er was to house the activities of the Pasadena area’s Community Chest and Council as well as the Catholic Welfare Bureau, Family Service and Volunteer Placement Bureau agencies, the Boy’ and Girls’ Clubs of Pasadena, and all Red Feather services. By the 1960s the building was renamed the Foothill Family Service, which served as a family counselling center (LAT 1951a, 1951b; PI 1967).

3.5 Project Site Architectural Styles
Mid-Century Modern (1933-1965)
Mid-century Modern style is reflective of International and Bauhaus styles popular in Europe in the early 20th century. This style and its living designers (e.g., Mies Van der Rohe and Gropius) were disrupted by WWII and moved to the United States. During WWII, the United States established itself as a burgeoning manufacturing and industrial leader, with incredible demand for modern buildings to reflect modern products in the mid-20th century. As a result, many industrial buildings are often “decorated boxes”—pla in buildings with applied ornament to suit the era and appear more modern without detracting from the importance of the activity inside the building. Following WWII, the United States had a focus on forward thinking, which sp arked architectural movements like Mid-Century Modern.

Practitioners of the style were focused on the most cu tting-edge materials and techniques. Architects throughout Southern California implemented the design aesthetics made famous by early Modernists like Richard Neutra and Frank Lloyd Wright, who created a variety of modern architectural forms. Like other buildings of this era, Mid-century Modern buildings had to be quickly assembled, and use modern materials that could be mass-produced. Both residences and offices designed in this style expressed its structure and materials, displayed large expanses of glass, and had an open interior plan (McAlester 2013; Morgan 2004; HRG 2007).

Characteristics of the Mid-Century Modern style:
x One- to two-stories in height
x Low, boxy, horizontal proportions
x Simple geometric forms with a lack of exterior decoration x Commonly asymmetrical
x Flat roofed without coping at roof line; flat roofs hidden behind parapets or cantilevered canopies x Expressed post-and-beam construction in wood or steel x Exterior walls are flat with smooth sheathing and typically display whites, buffs, and pale pastel colors x Mass-produced materials
x Simple windows (metal or wood) flush-mounted and clerestory x Industrially plain doors
x Large window groupings
DRAFT
1919
ontributioontribu
the estates of the es
e activities of the Pasae activitie
mily Service and Volunteer Pmily Service and
ther services. By the 1960s the bther services. By the
selling centerselling (LAT 1951a, 1951b951a, 1 ; PI 19
l Styles l Styl
ional and Bauhaus styles popular in Euional and Bauhaus styles Mies Van der Mies Van der Rohe and Gropius) were disropius) w States established itself as a burgeoninges established itself as a burgeoni n buildings to reflect modern products ins to reflect modern products in decorated boxes”es”—— plain buildings with aplain buildings with a cting from the importance of the activitycting from the importance of orward thinking, which sparked architectorward thinking, which sparke re focused on the most cuttingre focused on the most cutting --edge mae mented tmente he design aesthetics made famgn aesthetics made f o created a variety of modern architecturcreated a variety of modern architectur had to be quickly assembled, and use e quickly assembled, and use offices designed in this style expressedfices designed in this ad an open interior plan (McAlester 2013d an open interior plan (McA teristics of tteristic he Mid-Century Modern styleentury Modern sty OneOne-- to twoto -stories in heighteigh
w, boxy, horizontal proportiow, boxy, horizontal propo
e geometric forms we geometric forms w
ly asymmetricly asymmetric
without cwithout c

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
45 January 2020
CCorporate Modern (1955-1970)
The Corporate Modern Style is stylistically linked to the International Style, as such the two style’s history is intricately linked. Corporate Modernism came to the United States in the 1930s after gaining popularity in Germany, Holland and France through architects such as Walter Gropius and Ludwig Mies van der Rohe. The style soon spread to the United States in the 1930s, due in part to Henry-Russell Hitchcock and Philip Johnson’s 1932 book titled The International Style: Architecture Since 1922 for the New York Museum of Modern Art’s exhibition. In their book, Hitchcock and Johnson introduced the term International and identified the three principles as architecture as volume, regularity, and avoiding the application of ornament. These three principles have been the baseline for American International Style architects such as Richard Neutra and Philip Johnson. The style became very popular in the mid-20th century in almost all forms of architecture, using precise and universal materials and techniques that allowed the style to be used anywhere in the world. The most common application was as the corporate office, creating walls of glass with sharp angles located in the downtowns of many cities.

The main difference between Corporate Modern buildings and their predecessors was a lack of exterior support of solid masonry. They often depended on a metal interior skeleton and utilized the curtain wall to clad walls in glass.

This dependency on the metal frame resulted in windows hung in repeating patterns and brought another level of order to these already stripped down buildings. Mies’s designs specifically focused on perfection through mathematics, generating rectangular curtail wall designs displaying strong roots in the philosophy of the Bauhaus.

This movement incorporated simple and precise designs and incorporated mass-produced materials such as concrete, steel, and glass paired with functionality in design (SFPD 2010; McAlester 2015; HRG 2007).

Characteristics of the Corporate Modern Style:
x One- to three-stories in height
x Square and rectangular building footprints with open interior floor plans x Asymmetrical facades with simple cubic forms and strong right angles x Horizontally oriented rectangular boxes
x Flat roofs with flush parapet or cantilevered overhang x Tower over a parking podium, often screened
x Use of concrete, brick, steel, stucco and glass as exterior materials x Lack of exterior ornamentation
x Design dictated by steel framing system with vertical fins or louvers x Fenestration includes ribbon windows, corner windows, or glass curtain walls

3.6 Project Site Architects and Designers
Architect: Lane and Schlick, AIA (1922-1988, 1926-2010) Howard Raymond Lane was born on October 13, 1922 in Illinois. During World War II, Lane served in the Third Armored Division of the United States Army in Europe. After the war ended, he returned to Illinois to study architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) under renowned architect Mies van der Rohe. Lane graduated IIT in 1947 and worked for a short time as a draftsman for Skidmore, Ownings and Merrill in Chicago. A year later DRAFT
hnshns
Art’s exhibArt’s ex
ee principles as ee princ
nciples nciples have been theha
hnson. The style became verhnson. The style
e and universal materials and techne and universal materia mon application was as the corporate omon application was as the c of many cities.of man
d their predecessors was d their predecessors w a lack of exter keleton and utilized the curtain wall to claon and utilized the ows hung in repeating patterns repeating p and brou
Mies’s designs specifically focused specifi
l designs displaying strong roots in the pdesigns displaying strong roots recise designs and incorporated masse designs and incorporated ma ctionality in design (SFPD 2010; McAin design (SFPD 2010; lestlest dern Style: ern St
in heightin heig
ngular building footprints with open intengular building footprints with open in facades with simple cubic formscades with simple cubic forms and strand str lly oriented rectangular boxesrectangular
oofs with flush parapet or cantilevered ovoofs with flush parapet or c ower over a parking podium, often screenower over a parking podium, often Use of concrete, brick,Use of concrete, brick, steel,ste stucco ancco a Lack of exterior ornamentationLack of exterior ornamenta esign design dictated by steel framinel fra
stration includes rstration includes ribboibb
ojecojec

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
46 January 2020
Lane moved to Los Angeles, California and worked as a draftsman for Martin and Associates and later as a Project Architect for Pereira and Luckman until 1952. In 1953, Lane established his own architectural firm, the Lane Architectural Group based in Woodland Hills, California. Within the next year, Lane met architect Edward Ray Schlick and the two formed a partnership under the name Lane and Schlick, AIA.

Schlick was born on July 6, 1926 in Los Angeles. After spending two years in the Navy, he graduated from UC Berkeley with a degree in architecture in 1953. Schlick and his wife Fran moved to Studio City in 1953 when he began practicing with Lane. The firm was prolific arou nd the Los Angeles area and designed a wide range of buildings including residences, commercial buildings, ed ucational institutions, medical centers, and religious buildings. Lane and Schlick practiced for nine years and moved offices in 1962 into 15840 Ventura Boulevard in Encino. In 1963, the firm changed names from Lane and Schlick, AIA to Howard R. Lane, AIA and Associates due to Schlick moving to Ivanhoe, Texas and opening his own firm with seven partners named Octagon Associates in the early 1970s. Lane died on November 3, 1988 in Santa Monica. He was a fellow of the American Institute of Architects, 1959 president of the Architects of San Fernando Valley, and 1977 president of the California Council of AIA. Schick continued to practice architecture until a month before his death in 2010 (LAT 1962a, 1963, 1988; VT 1959; VTD 2010; archINFORM 2019).

A sample of Lane and Schlick’s known work is included below (LAT 1962; archINFORM 2019; LAC 2019):
x 17100 Ventura Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1953)
x 16035 Ventura Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1959)
x 4419 Van Nuys, Los Angeles, CA (1961)
x 4416 S. Normandie Avenue, Los Angeles, CA (1961)
x 14044 Ventura Boulevard, Sherman Oaks, CA (1961)
x King Solomon Restaurant, Ventura Boulevard and Gloria Avenue, Los Angeles, CA (1962) x 5251 Sepulveda Boulevard, Van Nuys, CA (1962)
x 1745 N. Sycamore, Los Angeles, CA (1962)
x 5400 Van Nuys Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1962)
x 11139 Acama Street, Los Angeles, CA (1962)
x 740-750 East Green Street, Pasadena, CA (1963)
x 15739 Ventura Boulevard, Valley Beth Shalom, Los Angeles, CA (1964) A
Architect: William Leo Rudolph (1923-1981)
William L. Rudolph was an American architect born in Los Angeles on September 25, 1923. He attended college at the University of California Berkley for architecture. Little is known about Rudolph’s early life and career. He is known to have practiced architecture between the 1960s and 1980 in Southern California specifically in the Los Angeles and Pasadena areas. Rudolph was head of the Los Angeles firm William L. Rudolph and Associates, which was known for their ability to design resorts that reflect the character of the area where they are located and their environmental settings. The firm’s most well-known commissions were the Acapulco Princess resort in Mexico and the Southampton Princess in Bermuda. Rudolph died in Los Angeles in 1981 (DS 1974; AIA 1962).

A sample of William L. Rudolph’s known work is included below (LAT 1962c, 1972):

DRAFT
y, hy, h
Studio CityStudio
and designed aand de
ns, medical centers, ans, medica
962 into 15840 Ventura Bou962 into 15840
oward R. Lane, AIA and Associates oward R. Lane, AIA and n partners named Octagon Associates inn partners named Octagon As . He was a fellow of the American Inst. He was a fellow of the American alley, and 1977 palley, and 1977 president of the CalifornCalifor th before his death in 2010 (LAT 1962ah before his death in 2 ded below (LAT 1962;962; archINFORM 201ar
es, CA (1953) CA (1953)
ngeles, CA (1959) A (19
CA (1961)
ueue, Los Angeles, CA (1961) , Los Angeles, CA (1961)
evardevard, Sherman Oaks, , Sherman O CA (1961) 1961
estaurant, Ventura estaurant, Ventura BoulevardBo and GloriaGlor veda BoulevardBouleva , Van Nuys, CA (1962) Van Nuys, CA (1962) . Sycamore, Los Angeles, CA (1962) Sycamore, Los Angele 00 Van Nuys 00 Van Nuys BoulevardBoule , Los Angeles, CALos An 11139 Acama 11139 Streetet, Los Angeles, CA (, Los Angeles, CA 740740-750 East Green Sttreetreet, Pasad
5739 Ventura 5739 V Boulevardard, Val,
aa
D
mm
D
LL
D
ee
D
oo
D
R
D
u
D
d
D
o
D
l
D
pp
D
hh
D
((
D
11 D
99 D
was an Awas an A
rnrn

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
47 January 2020
x 770-784 East Green Street, Pasadena, CA (1956)
x Bowling Center at Astoria and Foothill Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1960) x Carpinteria Shopping Center, Los Angeles, CA (1962)
x 725 Ocean Avenue, Santa Monica, CA (1962)
x Caruso’s Restaurant, Canandaigua Lake, New York (1962) x Acapulco Princess Hotel, Mexico (1969)
x Southampton Princess Hotel, Bermuda (1972)
x Lake, California planned community, CA (1972)
x Westlake Village offices, Westlake Village, CA (1974) x The Springs Clubhouse, Palm Springs, CA (1974)
x Green Tree Inn addition, Victorville, Los Angeles, CA (1980) CContractor: Evald C. Moller (1905-1996)
Evald C. Moller was born in Michigan on January 30, 1905. In 1906, Moller and his family moved to Pasadena, California where he started his own general contracting firm in 1928 called E. C. Moller Inc. Throughout his time living in Pasadena, Moller was heavily involved with local politics and trade organizations. In 1950, he was elected president of the Pasadena Chamber of Commerce after serving as president of the Building Contractors of California, Inc. and president of the Pasadena Kiwanis Club. Moller continued to participate in local organizations and in 1961 was given the role of chairman of the Pasadena Recreation Commission. In 1963, Moller’s term in the Recreation Commission ended after also serving as director of the Tournament of Roses Association in 1962. Moller retired from the construction business in 1976 after working for 47 years in Pasadena. In 1986, Moller moved to Gleneden Beach, Oregon and became a member of the board of North Lincoln Hospital. Moller died on May 22, 1996 while living in North Lincoln, Oregon (LAT 1950b, 1976; PI 1961, 1963; SJ 1996).

Architect: Charles Jeffries “Cejay” Parsons (1916-1975) Cejay Parsons was born in February 18, 1916 in Oakland, California. Parsons was a prolific architect of commercial, medical and industrial buildings in the Mid-Century Modern style in the Los Angeles area and Hawaii. In 1959, Parsons formed a new enterprise known as Cejay Parsons, AIA, Architects and Associates with offices in the Mission Insurance Building at 300 S. Hobart Boulevard in Los Angeles. Parson’s firm prior to that was Jack H. MacDonald and Cejay Parsons, Associated Architects and Engineers. Parsons worked closely with engineer Jack H. MacDonald who specialized in industrial buildings. In Los Angeles, Parsons designed more than 60 buildings between the late 1940s and 1966. Four of these early projects were published in Architectural Record including a church, a single- family residence from the late 1940s, and two commercial buildings from 1950. Parsons was known for the extensive development of the W. 6th Street insurance center area where he designed the Gianinni-Falabrino buildings, the Phoenix Connecticut and Phoenix London bu ildings, Manufacturer’s Life, Scandinavian Air Service and Travelers buildings in Beverly Hills. In the late 1960s, Parsons moved to Honolulu and designed condominiums and hotels in Honolulu, Princeville, Kauai, and Guam throughout the 1970s. Parsons died on July 19, 1975 in Queen’s Hospital in Honolulu (HRG 2010; THA 1975; LAT 1959; HSB 1975).

DRAFT
A (19801980))
ry 30, 1905. ry 30, 190 In 1906, Moller and his faMoller a contractingtracting firm in 1928firm in called E. C. Moed E. C olved with local politicsh local politics and trade organizand trade organiz of Commerce after service after servi ng as presideng as presid Pasadena Kiwanis Club. Pasadena Kiwanis Club. Moller continuMoller continu f f chairman of the Pasadena Recreation chairman of the Pasadena d after also serving as director of the Toud after also serving as director of ion business in 1976 after working for 4ion business in 1976 after working f on and became a member of the boardn and became a member of the board North Lincoln, Oregon (Lincoln, Oregon (LAT 1950LAT 1950bb, 197, 197 rll
D
ee
D
ss
D
JJ
D
ee
D
ff
D
fffffffff
D
rr
D
ii
D
ee
D
ss
DR
“
DR
C
DR
e
DR
jej
DR
a
DR
y
DR
””
DR
PP
DR
aa
DR
rr
DR
ss
DR
oo
DR
n
R
s
R
(
R
1 R
9 R
1 R
6 R
-
R
1 R
9 R
7 R
arsons was born in February 18, 1916 in arsons was born in February 18, 1916 cal and industrial buildings in the Midcal and industrial buildings in the Mid s formed a new enterpriss formed a new enterprise known ae kn Building at 300 S. Hobart BBuilding at 300 S. Hobar
rsons, Associated Archrsons, Associated Arc
in industrial buiin industrial bui
Four of theFour of the
thethe

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
48 January 2020
A sample of Parsons’ known work is included below (HRG 2010; THA 1972, 1972):
x 601 S. Ardmore Avenue, Los Angeles, CA (1951)
x 111 S. Hudson Avenue, Pasadena, CA (1951)
x 601 S. Kingsley Drive, Los Angeles, CA (1952)
x 610 Shatto Place, Los Angeles, CA (1952)
x 3750 W. 6th Street, Los Angeles, CA (1953)
x 3535 W. 6th Street, Los Angeles, CA (1954)
x 241 South Rimpau Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1955)
x Bank of America Building, Los Angeles, CA (1955)
x 3850 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1956)
x 611 S. Catalina Street, Los Angeles, CA (1957)
x 3400 W. 6th Street, Los Angeles, CA (1957)
x 548 S. Kingsley Drive, Los Angeles, CA (1958)
x 300 S. Hobart Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1959)
x 5820 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA (1959)
x Hale Moani Condominiums, Launiu Street, Honolulu, HI (1971) x Alii Kai Condominiums, Princeville, Kauai, HI (1974)
AArchitect: John Curtis Chambers (1904-2003)
John Curtis Chambers was born on October 4, 1904 in Riverside, California. Little is known about the early life and career of Chambers aside from his residential work in the Los Angeles and Pasadena area. Curtis frequently designed Ranch style tract homes and apartments in Pasadena. He was a member of the Pasadena Chapter of the American Institute of Architects in 1962. Chambers died on April 18, 2003 (Ancestry 2019; AIA 1062).

A sample of Chambers’ known work is included below (LAT 1938, 1940, 1941, 1942, 1950a, 1955a):
x Rancho House, Pasadena, CA (1938)
x Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Santa Anita, CA (1940)
x 956 Coronado Drive, Santa Anita Village, Arcadia, CA (1941) x Foothill Boulevard district, Rancho Santa Anita, CA (1942) x 424-30 San Vicente Boulevard, Pasadena, CA (1950)
x Buena Berry Park development, Long Beach, CA (1955)
DRAFT
58)
CA (1959)CA (1959)
les, CA (1959)A (1959)
uniu Street, Honolulu, HIHonolulu, HI (1971)(1971)
nceville, Kauai, HInceville, K (1974)1974)
ee
R
rr
R
ss
R
((
R
11 R
99 R
0 R
4 R
-
R
2 R
0 RA
00 RA
33 RA
))
RA
was born on October 4, 1904 in Riversidas born on October 4, 1904 in Riversid s aside from his residential work in th f r o m h i s r e s i d e n t i a l w o r k i n t h style tract homes and apartmentmes and a s in Pas
titute of Architects in 1962. Chambers dtitute of Architects in 1962. le of le of Chambers’Ch known work is included own work is include Rancho House, Pasadena, CA (19Rancho House, Pasadena,
othill Boulevard, Rancho Saothill Boulevard, Rancho
oronado Drive, Sanoronado Drive, San
ulevard disulevard dis
cee

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
49 January 2020

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BINTENTIONALLY LE LANK

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
50 January 2020
4 Field Survey

4.1 Methods
Dudek Senior Architectural Historian Sarah Corder, MFA, conducted a pedestrian survey of the Project site for historic built environment resources on August 9 and 19, 2019. The survey entailed walking the exteriors of five commercial properties within the Project site, documenting each building with notes and photographs, specifically noting character-defining features, spatial relationship s, observed alterations, and examining any historic landscape features on the property. The Project site is entirely developed and contains no exposed sediment, therefore, an archaeological survey was not completed. Dudek documented the fieldwork using field notes, digital photography, close-scale field maps, and aerial photographs. Photographs of the subject property were taken with a digital camera. All field notes, photographs, and records related to the current study are on file at Dudek’s Pasadena, California, office.

4.2 Results
During the course of the pedestrian survey, Dudek identified five buildings over 45 years old requiring recordation and evaluation for historical significance, including the following addresses: 740-750 East Green Street, 770 East Green Street, 790 East Green Street, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue. Section 5 (Significance Evaluations) provides a detailed physical description of each of these properties and the associated significance evaluations under all applicable national, state, and local designation criteria and integrity requirements.

DRAFT
n survey of the n surve
ntailed walking the extntailed wa
th notes and photographs, spth notes and pho
alterations, and examining any hlterations, and exam
eloped and contains no exposedeloped and contains no expo sedim cumented the fieldwork using field notescumented the fieldwork using field n hotographs of the subject property were hotographs of the subject property were s related to the current study are on firelated to the curren y, Dudek identified fivek identified five buildings over 45buildings over 45 e, including the following addresses: 74the following addresses: 7 et, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 11t, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 11 es a detaies a detailedled physical description of descri eac der all applicable der all applicabl national, state, annal, s

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
51 January 2020

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DRAFT

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BINTENTIONALLY LE LANK

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
52 January 2020
5 Significance Evaluations
In order to determine if the proposed Project will impact historical resources under CEQA, all five previously unevaluated properties within the Project site were evaluated for historical significance and integrity in consideration of NRHP, CRHR, and City of Pasadena desi gnation criteria and integrity requirements. A detailed physical description of each property is also provided.

5.1 Building 1 (740-750 East Green Street)
PProperty Description
Building 1 (740-750 E. Green Street) is a three-story Corporate Modern rectangular office building with exterior walls clad in white rough textured stucco, plate glass, sq uare off-white tiles, smooth concrete, and running bond brick (Figure 5). The building is situated on the sout heast corner of E Green Street and S Oak Knoll Avenue.

Underneath the center of the building is an open parking lot supported by concrete posts. The roof of the building is flat and sheathed in rolled asphalt. The main (north) elevation presents as four sections from left the right. The first features smooth concrete wall with a grid of 25 plate glass windows separated by a metal frame above, the next section extends out approximately five feet from the main building with a storefront entry and double-leaf door on the first-floor and monolithic wall divided into four vertical sections with square tiles. The next section is over a open garage and features a wall of plate glass windows divided by metal frames; the final section continues the wall of plate glass and metal framing with a projecting glass storefront below with a double leaf entry door. The west elevation (Figure 6) displays five brick columns separa ting two metal frame storefront windows one with two windows the other with three, and sections of rough painted stucco between. The second and third floors display a monolithic wall of painted rough textured stucco. The south elevation (Figure 7) displays as two sections and is primarily clad in painted rough textured stucco. The left portion of the elevation features a projecting one-story entry with a single leaf entry door and two sets of vertically oriented bands of plate glass windows, three windows wide with a projecting metal frame. The two sections are divided by a three-story tall brick and stucco projection. The right portion of the elevation displays the open garage on the first-story with a series of eight horizontal bands of metal frame sliding windows and a building height thin brick wall.

DRAFT
ificanifican
grity requiregrity req
n StreetStreet))
rate Modernrate Mo rectangularctangu office buildingg
uare offe off--whitewh tiles,es, smooth concrete,sm an
heast corner of E Green Street and S ner of E Gre
arking lot supported by concrete posts. Tted by c
(north) elevation (north) ele presents as four sectionts as f d of 25 plate glass windows separated f 25 plate glass windows separat e feet from the main building withom the main building w a storestore vided into four vertical sections with squur vertical sections with sq plate glass windows divided by metal fplate glass windows divided by metal f ming with a projecting glass sming with a projecting glass storefront bet five brick columns separating two mefive brick columns separating eeee,, and sections of rough painted stuccoand sections of rough painted st ted rough textured stucco. ed rough textured stucco. The south eThe south e nted rough textured stucco. The left ugh textured stucco. The left portiporti f entry door and two sets of vertically ornd two set
ting metal frame. Theting metal frame. The two sections are two s on of the elevation on of the elevation displays the open gadisplays the o rame rame sliding windows and a building heisliding windows and a building he

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
53 January 2020
Figure 5. Building 1: North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_0362) Figure 6. Building 1: West Elevation, View looking northeast (IMG_0384) DRAF
orth Elevationevatio , View looking southView looking s westwest ((I T

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
54 January 2020
Figure 7. Building 1: South Elevation, View looking north (IMG_0414) IIdentified Alterations
Dudek staff visited the City of Pasadena Building Depa rtment on September 9, 2019 and viewed all permits pertaining to the subject property (AIN 5734-025-024).
x 1963. Permit to construct a new 15,800-sf concrete and brick office building with a composition roof. (#909820)
x 1963. Permit to instill 24” number wall sign “750”. (#05374) x 1966. Permit to cut 4’ x 7’ in brick wall of office. (#6035) x 1966. Permit to replace non-bearing interior office partitions. (#3539) x 1966. Permit to remove and add partitions and add electrical outlets. (no permit #) x 1966. Permit to add interior wall partitions and doors and relocate lighting. (no permit #) x 1982. Permit to replace evaporative condenser. (#82164) x Date Unknown: Observed window and door replacements on north elevation.

NRHP/CRHR Statement of Significance
The property located at 740-750 East Green does not meet any of the criteria for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, either individually or as part of an existing historic district.

DRAFT
th h Elevation, View looking Elevation, View looking northnorth ((IMG_04 asadena Building Department on Septasadena Building Departme erty (AINerty (AIN 5734734--02502 -024).
construct a nconst ew 15,800w 15, -sf concrete acrete
Permit to instill 24” number wall sign “75ermit to instill 24” num 966966. Permit to cut 4’ x 7’. Permit to cut 4’ x in brick wall of brick w 1966196 . Permit to replace nonce no -bearingg
966. Permit to remove and a966. Permit to remove an
ermit to add inteermit to add inte
to reto re

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
55 January 2020
CCriterion A/1: That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.

Criterion B/2: That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.

Criterion C/3: That embody the di stinctive c haracteristics o f a t ype, p eriod, or method of construction, or t hat represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

Building 1 is a modest example of a Corporate Modern office building designed by Los Angeles-based architectural firm Lane and Schlick, AIA in 1963. It displays several design elements associated with the Corporate Modern architectural style, which is linked stylistically to the International Style. The Corporate Modern style became popular in the mid-20th century in almost all forms of architecture, using precise and universal materials and techniques that allowed the style to be used anywhere in the world. Building 1 includes the following characteristics of the Corporate Modern style: three-stories in height, rectangular building footprint with open interior floor plan, asymmetrical facade with simple cubic forms and strong right angles, horizontally oriented rectangular boxes, flat roof with flush parapet, use of concrete, brick, steel, and glass as exterior materials, lack of exterior ornamentation, design dictated by steel framing system with vertical fins or louvers, fenestration includes glass curtain walls. Lane and Schlick, AIA was prolific around the Los Angeles ar ea and designed a wide range of buildings including residences, commercial buildings, educational institutions , medical centers, and reli gious buildings during the 1950s and 1960s. Despite the building’s ability to convey the most basic elements of the Corporate Modern style of architecture, Building 1 does not stand as a distinctive or important example of the style and does not represent the work of a master architect. For these reasons, 740-750 East Green Street does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion C or CRHR under Criterion 3.

DRAFT
wntuwntu
ultiple tenultiple t
oadly representaoadly re
gnificant contribution tgnificant c
property does not appear eligiproperty does not
nn
F
tt
F
ii
F
nn
F
oo
F
u
F
r
FT
p
FT
a
FT
s
FT
t
FT
.

FT
owners or people who have worked at owners or people who have worked at t onal, state, or local level. As such, thisal, state, or local le mportant to the nation’s or state’s past.to the nation
irectly tied to an important pern import son and
which he or she is known. This properwhich he or she is known. Th storic work and does not appear eligible c work and does not appear eligi i
R
n
R
c
R
t
R
iti
R
v
RA
ee
RA
c
RA
h
RA
a
RA
r
RA
ararara
RA
c
RA
t
RA
etete
RA
rr
RA
iirriiirii
RA
ssiissiiss
RA
tt
RA
iittiii
RA
cc
RA
ssccsscccssccss
RA
oo
RA
ff
A
aa
A
tt
A
yty
A
pypyp
A
e
A
,
A
p
A
e
A
rr
A
iiiii
A
oo
A
dd
A
tt
R
hh
R
aa
R
tt
R
pp
R
oo
R
ss
RA
ss
RA
ee
RA
ss
RA
ss
RARA
h
RA
i
RA
gigig
RA
hh
RA
a
RA
r
RA
t
RA
i
RA
ssissississ
RA
tt
RA
ii
RA
cc
RA
vv
RA
aavvaavvvaavvaaa
RA
ll
A
u
A
e
A
s
A
,
A
o
A
r
A
t
A
h
A
a
A
t
A
ll
R
aallaa
R
cc
R
kk
R
ii
R
nn
RR
d
R
i
R
v
R
ii
R
d
RA
uu
RA
aa
RA
ll
RA
dd
RA
ii
RA
sisis
RA
t
RA
iti
RA
n
RA
c
RA
t
RA
iti
RA
o
RA
n
RA
.

RA
xample of a Corporate Modern office buxample of a Corporate Modern office bu ck, AIAA in 1963. It displays several desin 1963. It displays several des , which is linked nked stylisticallystylistic to the Internaterna h century in almost all forms of h century in almost all fo architec d the style to be used anywhere in the d the style to be used anywher te Modern style: te Mod threethree--stories in heigstories in he metrical facademetric with simple cubicmple c formsrms
th flush parapet, use of concrete, brth flush parapet, use of concr ctated by steel framing systemctated by steel framing sys AIAAIA was prolific arouwas prolific arou
mmercial buildingmmercial buildin
Despite thDespite th
g1g1

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
56 January 2020
CCriterion D/4: That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

The property is not significant under Criterion D of the NRHP or Criterion 4 of the CRHR as a source, or likely source, of important historical information nor does it appear likely to yield important information about historic construction methods, materials or technologies.

Pasadena Statement of Significance
The City of Pasadena’s landmark designation criteria is based on the NRHP/CRHR designation criteria and integrity requirements, Therefore, for all of the reasons identified in the discussion of NRHP and CRHR eligibility, the subject property does not appear eligible under any local designation criteria, either individually or as part of a district.

Integrity Discussion
Building 1 maintains integrity of location, as it remains in its original location. The building retains integrity of design as it has not undergone any large-scale exterior alterations since its construction and maintains the essential features of form, plan, space, structure, and style. The building retains integrity of setting, upon its construction the majority of East Green Street had already been developed with commercial properties and this has not substantially changed since 1963. The building maintains integrity of materials and workmanship due to the retention of the physical elements that date from its construction. Several windows and a set of doors on the north elevation were replaced over time but the majority of the building’s original materials are existant. The building also retains integrity of feeling and association, where the property retains the ability to express itself as an office building constructed in the 1960s. In summary, while the building retains the re quisite integrity for designation, it does not rise to the level of significance required for designation at the national, state or local levels.

5.2 Building 2 (770-784 East Green Street)
Property Description
Building 2 (770-784 East Green Street) is a two-story Corporate Modern mixed-use relatively rectangular building that abuts buildings 1 and 3 on its east and west elevations. Exterior walls are clad in a variety of materials including stucco, running bond brick, plate glass, and terrazzo panels. The roof of the building is flat and sheathed in rolled asphalt. The main (north) elevation is separated into two sections by a series of three brick pilasters and walls. The left section displays two sets of metal-frame storefront windows with glass entry doors under a rounded awning separated by a section of terrazzo panels (Figure 8). The second-story displays two bands of plate glass ribbon windows divided by horizontal bands of painted rough textured stucco. The right section displays two integral metal- frame storefront entries separated by terrazzo panels. A two-story band of plate glass windows is connected to a series of second-story ribbon windows that continue the band of stucco from the left section of the elevation (Figure 9). The other visible elevation is the south, which displa ys running bond brick and variety of fenestration types including single-pane, horizontal sliding, and one over three windows and single and double-leaf metal entry doors (Figure 10). The left section extends out approximately 15 feet from the main building and features a two-story metal staircase.

DRAFT
RR designation design criteria
RHPRHP and CRHR eligibility, tand CRH
err individually or as part of a distrindividually or as p ginal locationginal lo . The building he bu retains integregr ns since its construction and maintains since its constructi uilding retains integrity of setting, upon etains integrity i oped with commercial properties and thismercial p
egrity of materials and workmanship duegrity of materials and work on.n. Several windows and a set of doors Several windows and a set of uilding’s original materials are existant.s original materials are existant.TT operty retains the ability to express itselns the ability to express its building retains the requisite integrity fs the requisite integrity f designation adesignation at the national, state or locational, st ding 2 ding 2 (7700--784 East G784 East
n
D
7070--784 East Green Street)784 East Green Street) is a two-stor s buildings 1 and 3 on its east s buildings 1 and 3 on its east and west eand w , running bond brick, plate glass, running bond brick, plate g , and and tete alt.alt. The main (north) elevation is separThe main (north) elevation is separ ion displays two sets of metalion displays two sets of me -f by a section of terraby a section of terra zzozzo p
ed by horizontal baned by horizontal ban
entries separaentries separa
y ribboy ribbo

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
57 January 2020
Figure 8. Building 2: Left section of North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_0489) Figure 9. Building 2: Right section of North Elevation, View looking southeast (IMG_0496) DRAF
ction of Northorth EElevation, View looking souon, View looking sou T

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
58 January 2020
Figure 10. Building 2: South Elevation, View looking northeast (IMG_0455) IIdentified Alterations
Dudek staff visited the City of Pasadena Building Depa rtment on September 9, 2019 and viewed all permits pertaining to the subject property (AIN 5734-025-014).
x 1956. Permit to construct a two-story concrete, brick, and stucco building for $100,000. (#9682779) x 1956. Install 18” metal letters mounted on stucco wall. (#15170) x 1960. Permit to add 6,000 square foot of office. (#48446) x 1960. Permit for repairs of fire damage, no structural member’s involved or exterior work needed. (#2343) x 1960. Permit to install interior partitions with no exterior work. (#6185) x 1962. Permit to cut a doorway. (#8475-0)
x 1963. Permit to add one room to the second floor. (#01669) x 1966. Permit to relocate interior partitions. (#09782) x 1973. Permit to add partitions and counter and new rear stair. (#44556) x 1977. Permit to partition office area 10’ x 12’. (#37579) DRAF
: South Elevation, View looking northeasevation, View looking northeas y of Pasadena Building Department ony of Pasadena Building Departme propertyprope (AIN 5734734--0250 -014).
mit to construct a twostruct a two--story concrete, bristory concrete, bri

6. Install 18” metal letters mounted on s6. Install 18” metal letters m 1960. Permit to add 6,000 square foo1960. Permit to add 6,000 square foo 1960. Permit for repairs of fire da1960. Permit for repairs of . Permit to install inte. Permit to install inte
mit to cut mit to cut
T

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
59 January 2020
x 1978. Permit to reroof composition roof with 30 felts and glaskap. (#86522) x 1981. Permit to install interior partitions, “non-structural”. (#188560) x 1987. Permit to re-roof business with class A GAF built up. (#0016471) x Date Unknown: Observed window and door replacements on north elevation.

NNRHP/CRHR Statement of Significance
The property located at 770-784 East Green does not meet any of the criteria for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, either individually or as part of an existing historic district. Addresses associated with this property include: 770, 772, 774, 776, 780, and 784 East Green Street.

Criterion A/1: That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad p atterns of our history.

Criterion B/2: That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.

Criterion C/3: That e mbody t he d istinctive characteristics of a typ e, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

Building 2 is a modest example of a Corporate Modern office building designed by Los Angeles-based architect William Leo Rudolph in 1956. It displays several design elements associated with the Corporate Modern architectural style, which is linked stylistically to the International Style. The Corporate Modern style became popular in the mid-20th century in almost all forms of architecture, using precise and universal materials and techniques that allowed the style to be used anywhere in the world. This building includes the following characteristics of the Corporate Modern style: two-stories in height, rectangular building footprint with open interior floor plan, asymmetrical facade with simple cubic forms and strong right angles, horizontally oriented rectangular boxes, flat a for listing in the NRHP or CRHRa for listing in the NR ted ted with this property inclwith this property inc ude: 770, 7 aa ss
F
ii
F
ggiiiggg
F
nn
F
ii
F
ff
F
iffifi
F
c
F
a
F
n
F
t
F
c
F
o
FT
n
FT
t
FT
rr
FT
iiii
FT
bb
FT
uu
FT
tt
FT
i
FT
o
FT
n
FT
t
FT
o
FT
t
FT
h
FT
e
FT
b
FT
r
T
ororo
T
a
T
d
T
pp
T
aa
T
events that have made a significant conve made
as completed in as co 1956956, during the pe, du
treet and prior to a period of economic deet and prior to a period of econo cted as an office buildings an office building,, which hosted which hosted nce Companyny. Although th. Although the property is be property is b ssociation with events that have made aevents that have made a of California, or the Nation. Therefore, theof California, or the Nation. Th rion 1 of the CRHR.rion 1 of the CR
ssss
R
oo
R
cc
R
ii
R
aa
R
tt
R
e
R
d
R
w
R
ii
R
t
R
h
R
t
R
h
R
ee
RA
ll
RA
ii
RA
vv
RA
eeee
RA
s
RA
o
RA
f
RA
p
RA
e
RA
r
RA
srsrsrs
RA
o
RA
n
RA
ss
RA
ss
RA
ii
A
ggiiggg
A
nn
A
i
A
f
A
did not indicate that any previous propedicate that any previous prope e historically significant figures at the nhistorically significant ve any historical associations with peoplve any historical associations gible under B/2 the property has to begible under B/2 the property has t dual conducted or produced the work fodual conducted or produced the work f ciated with any individualiated w ’s important s imp
R under Criterion 2.R unde
TT
D
hhTThhh
D
aa
D
tt
D
ee
D
mm
D
b
D
o
D
d
D
yydy
D
tt
D
hh
D
ee
D
dd
kk
D
oo
D
ff
D
aa
D
mm
D
aa
D
ss
D
tt
D
ee
D
rr
D
ee
D
nn
D
tt
D
ssttssttsss
D
mm
D

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
60 January 2020
roof with flush parapet, use of brick, steel, and glass as ex terior materials, lack of exterior ornamentation, design dictated by steel framing system with vertical fins or louvers, fenestration includes glass curtain walls and ribbon windows. Rudolph is known to have practiced architecture between the 1960s and 1980 in southern California specifically in the Los Angeles and Pasadena area. Building 2 is not a distinctive or important example of the Corporate Modern style, nor is it the work of a master architect. Additionally, the building has undergone several alterations since its construction including replacement of windows and doors on the north elevation (date unknown), the addition of 6,000 square feet of office (1960), and reroofed (1987). For these reasons, 770-784 East Green Street does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion C or CRHR under Criterion 3.

C
Criterion D/4: That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information im portant in prehistory or history.

Integrity Discussion
Building 2 retains integrity of location, as it remains in its original location. The building does not retain integrity of design due to several large-scale exterior alterations including the addition of 6,000 square feet of office space in 1960 and the replacement of several windows and doors on the main elevation on an unknown date. The essential features of form, plan, space, structure, and style have not all been retained. The building retains integrity of setting, upon its construction the majority of East Green Street had already been developed with commercial properties and this has not substantially changed since 1956. The building does not retain integrity of materials and workmanship due to the lack of retention of the physical elements that date from its construction from subsequent alterations.

The building no longer retains integrity of feeling and association, where the property retains the ability to express itself as an office building constructed in the 1950s. In summary, while the building does not retain the requisite integrity for designation, it does not rise to the level of significance required for designation at the national, state or local levels.

5.3 Building 3 (790 East Green Street)
Property Description
Building 3 (790 East Green Street) is a two-story Corporate Modern office building located on the southwest corner of E Green Street and S Hudson Avenue with the corner of the building accentuated by a rectangular painted stucco overhang. The building’s exterior walls are primarily clad in running bond brick with every forth course raised approximately half an inch and sections of rough texture painted stucco and square gray tiles. The roof is flat and sheathed in rolled asphalt. The main (north) elevation presents as three sections (Figure 11). The left section displays a series of seven vertical plate glass windows separated by stepped back brick walls, the middle section is distinguished a square gray tile walls and an inset storefront window with a double leaf entry door, the right DRAFT
the nthe n
For these For the
C or CRHR under C or CR
rr
T
tt
T
aaaaa
T
nn
T
tt
T
ii
T
n
T
pp
T
rr
T
eeeee
T
hh
T
ii
T
ssiissiiissiiss
T
tt
T
oo
T
r
T
yry
T
o
T
r
T
h
T
i
T
sisis
T
t
T
o
T
r
T
y
T
n 4n 4 of the CRHR as a source, or likely soof the CRHR as a source, o yield important information about o yield important information ab a is based on the NRHP/CRHR designatioe NRHP/
entified in the discussion of NRHP and CRentified in the discussion of NR ocal designation criteria, either designation criteria, either individuaindiv tion, as it remains in its original locationtion, as it remains in its origin ale exterior alterations including the addale exterior alterations includin of several windows and doors on the maof several windows and doors on th pace, structure, anpace, structure, and styled sty have not all beeall be the majority of East Green Street had majority of East Green Street had alralr antially changanged since 1956ed since 1 . The buildinbuildin ofof retention of the physical elements thretention of the phys gg no longerno longer retainsretains integrity of feelinggrity of f an an officean offic building constructed in the 19g constructed in the rity for designation, it does not rise to therity for designation, it does not rise to the evels. evels.

Building 3 Building 3

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
61 January 2020
displays two plate glass windows with a square stucco surround and a single left glass entry door each with a fabric awing above. The west elevation displays no fenestration . The south elevation presents as two sections: the left has no fenestration and the right has two metal entry doors on both floors (Figure 12). The east elevation presents as two sections: the left is recessed approximately 40 feet with a small asphalt parking lot outlined by a low brick wall and a double leaf metal entry door on the first floor and a single leaf and single pane window on the second story. The right section displays a series of windows with a decorative surrounding of painted stucco, the first has three windowpanes followed by four single pane windows all with a fabric awning above (Figure 13).

Figure 11. Building 3: North elevation, View looking south (IMG_0484) DRA
gure gure 11.1
FT
intedinted
ve (Figureve (Fig
Building 3: North elevation, Vieg 3: North elevation, Vie

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
62 January 2020
Figure 12. Building 3: South elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_0463) Figure 13. Building 3: East Elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_0475) IIdentified Alterations
Dudek staff visited the City of Pasadena Building Depa rtment on September 9, 2019 and viewed all permits pertaining to the subject property (AIN 5734-025-026).
elevation, View elevation, V looking northnorthwest (we IMG_ T

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
63 January 2020
x 1967. Permit to construct a 6,780 square foot concrete and masonry office building for $60,000. (#4126N) x 1972. Permit to cut through back wall and rear parking lot to install a door opening for a pair of 2’6” x 7’ doors. (#37501)
x 1973. Permit to install non-load bearing partitions. (#38645) x 1981. Permit to add air conditioning to existing building. (#6031) x 1982. Permit to remove walls and ceiling and replace with new interior walls and ceilings. (#8615) x 1999. Permit to change sill material. (#99-01668)
x 2000. Permit to tear off and re-roof capsheet rood class A. (#00-01387) x 2009. Permit to remove and prohibit signs from public view and right of way. (#2009-00561) x 2013. Permit to replace two wall signs within a stucco wall. x Dates Unknown: Observed alterations include window and door replacement on the north and east elevations.

N
NRHP/CRHR Statement of Significance
The property located at 790 East Green does not meet any of the criteria for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, either individually or as part of an existing historic district. Addresses associated with this property include: 788 East Green Street, and 101 and 103 South Hudson Avenue.

Criterion A/1: That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.

Criterion B/2: That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.

Archival research did not indicate that any previous property owners or people who have worked at this property are known to be historically significant figures at the national, state, or local level. As such, this property is not known to have any historical associations with people important to the nation’s or state’s past. Furthermore, to be found eligible under B/2 the property has to be directly tied to an important person and the place where that individual conducted or produced the work for which he or she is known. This property does not appear to be DRAFT
or walls and ceilings. (#86or walls and ce
A. (#00A. (#00-01387)
blic view and right of way. (#2009ic view and right of wa -00561 a stucco wall. l
include include window and w door replacemendoor rep
t Green t Green does not meet any of the criteriadoes not meet any o existing historic district. existing historic d Addresses ddres assoc 103 South Hudson Avenue. 103 South Hudson
rere
D
a
D
s
DR
s
DR
oo
DR
cc
DR
ii
DR
aa
DR
tt
DR
ee
DR
dd
DR
w
DR
ii
DR
t
DR
hh
DR
ee
DR
vv
DR
eeeee
R
nn
R
tt
R
stssttsss
R
tt
R
hh
R
aa
R
tt
R
hh
R
aa
RR
vv
R
eeeee
R
mm
R
aa
R
dd
R
search did not find any associations withsearch did not find any associat s of our history. The subjecs of our history. The sub t property propert utional growth along Pasadena’s Green utional growth along Pasadena’s Green the 1960s. The property was constthe 1960s. The property was ginning with the ginning Marble Mortble M
growth, it has no directgrowth, it has no direc
adena, the Stateadena, the State
RHP or CrRHP or Cr

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
64 January 2020
associated with any individual’s important historic work and does not appear eligible for the NRHP under Criterion B or CRHR under Criterion 2.

CCriterion C/3: That embody the distinctive characteristics of a typ e, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

Building 3 is a modest example of a Corporate Modern offi ce building designed by contractor Evald C. Moller in 1958. It displays several design elements associated with the Corporate Modern architectural style, which is linked stylistically to the International Style. The Corporate Modern style became popular in the mid-20th century in almost all forms of architecture, using precise and universal materials and techniques that allowed the style to be used anywhere in the world. This building includes the following characteristics of the Corporate Modern style: one-story in height, rectangular building footprint with open interior floor plan, asymmetrical facade with simple cubic forms and strong right angles, horizontally oriented rectangular boxes, flat roof with flush parapet, use of brick and glass as exterior materials, lack of exterior ornamentation, fenestration includes ribbon and corner windows.. Despite the building’s ability to convey the most basic elements of the Corporate Modern style of architecture, Building 3 does not stand as distinctive or important example of the style and does not represent the work of a master architect.

Alterations to the building include changing the sill material in 1999 and observed alterations including replacement of windows and doors on the north and east elevations. For these reasons, 790 East Green Street does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion C or CRHR under Criterion 3.

Criterion D/4: That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Integrity Discussion
Building 3 maintains integrity of location, as it remains in its original location. The building retains integrity of design as it has not undergone any large-scale exterior alterations since its construction and maintains the essential features of form, plan, space, structure, and style. The building retains integrity of setting, upon its construction the majority of East Green Street had been developed with commercial properties and this has not substantially changed since 1958. The building does not maintain integrity of materials and workmanship due to the replacement of several windows and doors that do not date for the buildings construction. The building retains integrity of feeling, where the property retains the ability to express itself as an office building constructed in the 1950s. The building no longer retains integrity of association, since its construction the property has changed tenants multiple times, disassociating it with the original tenants Marble Mort gage Company. In summary, while the building retains the requisite integrity for designation, it does not rise to the level of significance required for designation at the national, state or local levels.

DRAFT
by by contractor Econt
n architectural style, wn architec
pular in the midpular in the mid-20th century
niques that allowed the style to beniques that allowed th ics ofics of the Corporate Modern style: oneModern -
n, asymmetrical facade with simple cubicn, asymmetrical facade with simple flat roof with flat roo flush parapet, use of bricksh parapet, use of brick tion includes ribbon tion includes ribbon and corner a windows e Corporate Modern style of architectureporate Modern sty tyle and does not represent the work ofoes not repre
e sill material in 1999 and observedn 1999
h and east elevations. h and eas For these reasonFor thes HP under Criterion C or CRHR under Critender Criterion C or CRHR under Cr a
R
y
RA
b
RA
e
RA
l
RA
i
RA
k
RA
ee
RA
l
RA
yly
RA
t
RA
oo
RA
yy
RA
iiyyiii
RA
ee
RA
l
RA
d
RA
,d
RA
i
RA
n
RA
ff
A
ooffoofffoofoo
A
rr
A
mmmmm
A
aa
A
tt
A
ii
A
oo
A
nn
A
ii
A
mm
A
pp
A
oo
A
rr
A
tt
A
a
der Criterion D of the NRHP or Criterion 4der Criterion D of the NRHP or mation nor does it appear likely to ymation nor does it appear l terierials or technologies. als or technologie
of S
R
ii
R
gg
DR
nn
R
ii
R
ff
R
ii
R
cc
R
aa
R
n
R
c
R
e
R
adena’s landmark designation criteria is adena’s landmark design ts, ts, Therefore, for all Therefore, for a of the reasons identhe reas does not appear eligible does not appear eligible under any locaer any lo ii
D
tt
D
yyttyy
D
DD
D
ii
D
ss
D
cc
D
u
D
s
D
s
D
i
D
o
D
n
D
maintains integrity of locatmaintains integrity of loc
undergone any largundergone any lar
plan, space, splan, space, s
en Stren Str

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
65 January 2020

5.4 Building 4 (111 South Hudson Avenue)
PProperty Description
Building 4 (111 South Hudson Avenue) is a one-story L-shaped Modern brick commercial/office building facing onto South Hudson Avenue with a parking lot to its southwest. Exterior walls are clad in common bond brick with one section of roman brick. The roof is a combination side-g able and hipped roof with a Dutch gable facing west sheathed in composition shingles. All windows have metal frames. The main (east) elevation displays at three sections (Figure 14). The left contains three square plate glass windows and a pair of two glass entry doors with a transom and sidelight accessed by three concrete steps leading to the sidewalk. The middle section is distinguished by a section of tan roman brick and a concrete ADA ramp leading to the main entry. The right section displays a row of six plate glass windows. The north elevation displays a series of eight paired windows. Each pair contains an awning window over two-fixed panes (Figure 15). The west elevation displays as two sections. The left section contains one three-part awning over two fixed windows, an inset single leaf entry door, and two sets of three awning over two fixed pane windows. The right section displays a single leaf entry door with transom window above, two large plate glass windows, and a pair of two awning over fixed pane windows (Figure 16). The north elevation displays as two sections. The left section displays a series of five sets of awning over two fixed panes windows the first four contain three windows the last has two. The right section contains a pair of double awning over two fixed pane windows (Figure 17).

Figure 14. Building 4: East Elevation, View looking northwest (IMG_8528) DR
Figure Figure
AFT
offoff
mmon mmon
ith a Dutch gaith a D
(east) elevation disp(east) e
a pair of two glass entry doa pair of two g
walk. The middle section is distingalk. The middle sect e main entry. The right section displays ae main entry. The right sectio f f eight paired windoweight s. Each pair contaach pai
evation displays as two sections. evation displays as two sections. The leThe set single leaf entry door, and two sets of set single leaf entry door, and two sets of a single leaf entry door with transom wingle leaf entry door over fixed pane windowspane windo (Figure 16). T
series of five sets of awning over two fixts of aw
. The right section contains a pair of dou. The right section contains a p

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
66 January 2020
Figure 15. Building 4: North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_8521) Figure 16. Building 4: West and South Elevations, View looking northeast (IMG_8541) DR
re re 16.16. BuildBuild
AF
EElevation, View looking southwestlevation, View looking southw (IMG_8 T

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
67 January 2020
Figure 17. Building 4: South Elevation, View looking north (IMG_8534) IIdentified Alterations
Dudek staff visited the City of Pasadena Building Depa rtment on September 9, 2019 and viewed all permits pertaining to the subject property (AIN 5734-025-029).
x 1950. Permit to construct a one-story masonry office building with off street parking. (2C2847) x 1951. Permit to install sign. (#31535)
x 1960. Permit to replace air conditioning units. (#17757) x 1977. Permit to cut out door and remove inner wall, non-structural. (#75547) x 1977. Permit to install T-bar ceiling approximately 6,000 square feet. (#75142) x 1999. Permit to tear off and re-roof composition roofing with class A hot mop. (#99-00551) x 2002. Permit to improve one hour rated corridor new ceiling joist and beams at east wing of building. (#BLD2001-01525)
x 2002. Permit to install two roof top package heat-pumping units with ductwork and three ceiling mounted exhaust fans (must be screened from public view). (#MEC2002-00264) x Unknown date: Observed alterations include door replacement on east elevation.

NRHP/CRHR Statement of Significance
The property located at 111 South Hudson Avenue does no t meet any of the criteria for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, either individually or as part of an existing historic district.

DRAFT
evation, View looking norooking no th (IMG_8534)
na Building Department on September g Department on September N 5734-025-0299). ).
ct a onect a one--story story masonry office buildingoffice w nstall sign. (#31535)nstall sign. (#31535)
mit to replace air conditioning units. (#17place air conditioning units. (#17 . Permit to cut out door and remove innePermit to cut out door an 1977. Permit to install T1977. Permit to install T--bar ceiling appeiling ap 1999. Permit to tear off and re1999. Permit to tear off an -roo

2. Permit to improve on2. Permit to improve o
20012001--01525)01525)
t to inst to ins

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
68 January 2020
CCriterion A/1: That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.

Archival research did not find any associations with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. The subject property was completed in 1951, during the period of commercial and institutional growth along Pasadena’s Green Street and prior to a period of economic downturn that came with the end of the 1960s. The subject property was constructed to house the branch office for the State Board of Equalization, which served as headquarters for both the sales tax and liquor control divisions for the Pasadena sub district of the State agency. Although the property served as a governmental headquarters, there is no indication that the construction of the building had a broad effect on the history of the State Board of Equalization. The building’s construction was to fulfill a role of adding support to this area of Pasadena and there is no indication that it marked an important moment in history. Although the property is broadly representative of the city’s mid-century growth, it has no direct association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the City of Pasadena, the State of California, or the Nation. Therefore, the property does not appear eligible under Criterion A of the NRHP or Criterion 1 of the CRHR.

Criterion B/2: That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.

Criterion C/3: That em body t he d istinctive c haracteristics o f a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

Building 4 is a Modern commercial brick office building designed by Los Angeles-based architectural firm Cejay Parsons and Associates in 1951. In Los Angeles, Parsons designed more than 60 buildings between the late 1940s and 1966. Four of these early projects were published in Architectural Record including a church, a single-family residence from the late 1940s and two commercial buildings from 1950. The building at 111 South Hudson Avenue was not one of Parson’s well-known or publicized commission and is not a distinctive or important example of the Modern style used for an office building. The building displays several aspects of the Modern style including large plate glass windows, mix of exterior materials, and a lack of ornamentation. Despite the building’s ability to convey the most basic elements of the Modern style of architecture, Building 4 does not stand as an exceptional example of the style and does not represent the work of a master architect. For these reasons, the building does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion C or CRHR under Criterion 3.

Criterion D/4: That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

DRAF
AFT
wntuwntu
ffice for tffice fo
divisions for th divisio
eadquarters, there is neadquarte
the State Board of Equalithe State Board za
f Pasadena and there is no indicatiof Pasadena and there is oadly reoadly r presentative of the city’s midof the cit -ce significant contribution to the historysignificant contribution to the histor of he property does not appear eligible undehe property does not appear eligible und so
A
n
A
s
A
s
A
i
A
gig
AF
n
AF
i
AF
f
AF
ififi
AF
cc
AF
aa
AF
nn
AF
tt
AF
ii
AF
nn
AF
oo
AF
uu
AF
rr
AF
pp
AF
a
F
s
F
t
F
.

F
ous property owners or people who havous property owners or people es at the national, state, or local level. at the national, state, or local lev with people important to the nation’s or ople important to the nation’s or has to be directly tied toirectly tied to an importantan importan the work for which he or she is known.he work for which he or she is known. important historic work and does not apimportant historic work and d boo
R
dd
R
yyddyyy
R
tt
R
hh
R
e
R
d
R
i
R
sisis
R
t
R
iti
R
n
R
c
R
t
R
iti
R
vv
RA
eeeee
RA
cc
RA
hh
RA
aa
RA
rr
RA
aarraarrrara
RA
cc
RA
tt
RA
eettete
RA
r
RA
iriri
RA
sisis
RA
t
RA
iti
RA
c
RA
scscscs
RA
oo
RA
ffAaaAf a
D
m
DR
a
DR
ss
DR
tt
DR
ee
DR
rr
DR
,,rr
DR
oo
DR
rr
DR
t
DR
hh
DR
a
DR
t
DR
pp
DR
oo
DR
ss
R
ss
R
ee
R
ss
R
ss
R
hh
RA
ii
RA
ggiiiggiiggg
R
hhhhh
RA
aa
R
rr
R
ttt
R
ii
RA
ssiissiiissiisss
R
tt
R
ii
RA
cc
R
vv
R
aavva
R
p
D
o
D
n
D
e
D
n
D
t
D
ststs
DR
m
DR
a
DR
yy
DR
ll
DR
aalaallaa
DR
cc
DR
kk
DR
ii
DR
nn
DR
dd
DR
ii
DR
vv
DR
iiiii
DR
dd
R
u
R
a
R
l
R
d
R
i
R
sisis
R
t
R
iti
R
n
R
c
R
t
R
iti
R
o
R
n
R
.

R
s a s a MModern commercial brickodern commercial brick office bu and Associates in 1951. and Associates in 1951. In Los Angeles,s Angele 1966. Four of these early projects were 1966. Four of these early projects were nce from the late 1940s and two comnce from the late 1940s and t ne of Parson’s wellne of P -known ornown
used for an office buiused for an office bu
ows, mix of exteows, mix of exte
ments of thments of th
ot rot r

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
69 January 2020
PPasadena Statement of Significance
The City of Pasadena’s landmark designation criteria is based on the NRHP/CRHR designation criteria and integrity requirements, Therefore, for all of the reasons identified in the discussion of NRHP and CRHR eligibility, the subject property does not appear eligible under any local designation criteria, either individually or as part of a district.

Integrity Discussion
Building 4 maintains integrity of location, as it remains in its original location. The building retains integrity of design as it has not undergone any large-scale exterior alterations since its construction and maintains the essential features of form, plan, space, structure, and style. The building retains integrity of setting, upon its construction the majority of East Green Street and the blocks to its direct north and south had been developed with commercial and residential properties and this has not substantially changed since 1951. The building retains integrity of materials and workmanship due to the retention of the physical elements that date from its construction. The building also retains integrity of feeling, where the property retains the ability to express itself as an office building constructed in the 1950s. The building no longer retains integrity of association, since its construction the property has changed tenants multiple times, disassociating it with the original tenants the State Board of Equalization. In summary, while the building retains the requisite integrity for designation, it does not rise to the level of significance required for designation at the national, state or local levels.

5.5 Building 5 (118 South Oak Knoll Avenue)
Property Description
Building 5 (118 South Oak Knoll Avenue) is a one- and two-story rectangular in plan Mid-Century Modern childcare center facing onto South Oak Knoll Avenue. A parking lot is located to the east of the building. Exterior walls are clad in rough textured painted stucco with one section of concrete masonry units. The roof is combination flat and angled roof sheathed in rolled asphalt with wide overhanging eaves and exposed rafters. The main (west) elevation displays as two sections (Figure 18). Two angled roofs he ld up by eight square wooden posts distinguish the left section. Fenestration includes two wood frame horizontal sliding windows. The right section is two-stories with full two-story wooden posts and features four fixed wood frame windows on the second and first story, and a single glass entry door and sidelight. The north elevation presents as two sections. The left is one-story with an overhang held up by six wooden posts. Fenestration includes three wood horizontal sliding windows and a single leaf metal entry door. The right section is divided by a two-story exterior staircase with two rows of six wood horizontal sliding windows to the left and a pair of fixed pane windows on the right (Figure 19). The east elevation is cantilevered over a parking lot with a series of metal posts and displays three paired fixed pane windows on the second-story (Figure 20). The north elevation displays as two sections. The left is a cantilevered angled wall without fenestration. The right displays a series of three roof levels with multiple types of fenestration including horizontal sliding windows, sets of two and four fixed pane windows, single leaf metal entry door, and a single leaf entry door. A large HVAC unit is on the lower roof level. The far right of the first-story displays a series of nine wooden posts supporting the overhang.

DRAFT
building building retains integ
ruction and maintains theruction and m
egrity of setting, upon its constructrity of setting, upon h had been developed with commerciah had been developed with 1951.1951. The building T retains integrity of maintegrity that date from its construction. The buithat date from its construction. The bu lity to express itself as an officlity to express itself as e buildingng ociation, since its construction the propeation, since its const al tenants the State Board of Equalizationthe State Boa nation, it does not rise to the level of sigot rise t
18 South Oak Knoll Aveuth Oak Knoll Ave
noll Avenue) noll Av is a ones a o - and twowo--story st rect Oak Knoll Avenue. Oak Knoll Avenue. A parking lot is locatA parking lot is lo painted stucco ainted s with one section of concwith one section of conc ed in rolled asphalted asphalt with wide overwith wide overhanginhangin sections (Figurere 1818)). . Two angled roofs Tw
estration includes two wood frame horizoestration includes two wood wooden posts and features four fixed wwooden posts and features four f entry door and sidelight. The north elevatentry door and sidelight. The north eleva up by six wooden posts. Fenestration iup by six wooden posts. Fenestration i or. The right section is divided byor. The right section is divid the left and a pair of fixed the left and a pair of fixe with a series of metalwith a series of meta
levation displalevation displa
es of thres of thr
dd

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
70 January 2020
Figure 18. Building 5: West Elevation, View looking northeast (IMG_8491) Figure 19. Building 5: South and East Elevations, View looking northwest (IMG_8497) DR
Figure Figure 19. Building 5ilding
AFT
ation, View looking northeast (IMG_8491king north

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
71 January 2020
Figure 20. Building 5: North Elevation, View looking southwest (IMG_8506) IIdentified Alterations
Dudek staff visited the City of Pasadena Building Depa rtment on September 9, 2019 and viewed all permits pertaining to the subject property (AIN 5734-025-027).
x 1950. Permit to construct second floor offices above ex isting first floor plan and extend the second floor as an overhang approximately 20 feet above existing parking area. (#2813) x 1951. Permit to construct a two-story 6,000 square foot building for $61,000. (#15271) x 1951. Permit to add asphalt roofing. (#63375)
x 1981. Permit to reroof using 2 40’s and rock. (#8302) x 1993. Permit to re-roof commercial building with built up class B roofing. (#00153121) x 1995. Permit to alter approximately 2,150 square feet of space, work includes new partitions, doors, and ceiling patching and finishes. (#95-02626)
x 2016. Permit to install new monument 5’-6” x 6’-0’. (#BMN2016-00798) x 2016. Permit to replace existing sign with new freestanding pylon sign. (#PLN2016-00094) NRHP/CRHR Statement of Significance
The property located at 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue does not meet any of the criteria for listing in the NRHP or CRHR, either individually or as part of an existing historic district.

DRAFT
evation, View looking southwest (IMG_8evation, View looking southw dena Building Department onDepartment Septemeptem
(AIN 5734(AIN 5734-025-027). ).
nstruct second floor offices above existinnstruct second floor offices above pproximately 20 feet pproximately 20 feet above existing parkting p it to construct a twonstruct a two--story 6,000 squarestory 6,000 square Permit to Permit to add asphalt roofing. (#63375add asphalt roo 1981981. Permit to 1. reroof using 2 40’s androof using 2 40’s an 1993. Permit to re1993 -roof f commercicom

5. Permit to alter approx5. Permit to alter appr
patching and finispatching and finis
to insto ins

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
72 January 2020
CCriterion A/1: That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.

Archival research did not find any associations with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. The subject property was completed in 1951, during the period of commercial and institutional growth along Pasadena’s Green Street and prior to a period of economic downturn that came with the end of the 1960s. The subject property was constructed for the Pasadena area’s Community Chest and Council as well as the Catholic Welfare Bureau, Family Service and Volunteer Placement Bureau agencies, the Boy’ and Girls’ Clubs of Pasadena, and all Red Feather services. Although the property served as a community services headquarters, there is no indication that the construction of the building had a broad effect on the history of the Community Chest and Council as well as the other organizations it housed. The building’s construction was to fulfill a role of adding support to this area of Pasadena and there is no indication that it marked an important moment in history. Although the property is broadly representative of the city’s mid-century growth, it has no direct association with events that have made a significant contribution to the history of the City of Pasadena, Los Angeles County, the State of California, or the Nation. Therefore, the property does not appear eligible under Criterion A of the NRHP or Criterion 1 of the CRHR.

Criterion B/2: That are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past.

Criterion C/3: That embody t he d istinctive c haracteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

Building 5 is a modest example of an Mid-Century Modern style building designed by Los Angeles-area architect John Curtis Chambers in 1951. Like other buildings of the post-WWII era, Mid-century Modern buildings had to be quickly assembled, and use modern materials that could be mass-produced. The subject property includes the following features: one- and two-stories in height, low, boxy, horizontal proportions, simple geometric forms with a lack of exterior decoration, asymmetrical, cantilevered canopies, flat roofed without coping at roof line, expressed post-and-beam construction in wood, exterior walls are fl at with smooth sheathing in pale pastel color, mass- produced materials, simple windows, industrially plain doors, and large window groupings. John Curtis Chambers does not appear to have had a substantial influence on the field of architecture to the extent that he could be called a Master Architect. Overall, the building is not a distinctive or important example of the Mid-Century Modern style, nor is it the work of a master architect. For these reasons, the property does not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criterion C or CRHR under Criterion 3.

DRAF
AFT
wntuwntu
munity Chmunity
au agencies, theau age
served as a served as commun
ad a broad effect on the histoad a broad effect
d. d. The building’s construction was toThe building’s constr ation that it marked an important momeation that it marked an impor midmid--century growth, it has no direct assocentury growth, it has no direct story of the City of Pasadena, Los Angelstory of the City of Pasadena, Los Ange does not appear eligible under Criterion does not appear eligib pe
A
r
A
srsrsrs
A
o
A
n
A
s
A
s
A
i
A
gig
AF
n
AF
i
AF
f
AF
ififi
AF
c
AF
a
AF
n
AF
tt
AF
ii
AF
nn
AF
oo
AF
uu
AF
r
AF
p
AF
a
F
s
F
t
F
.

F
revious property ous property owners or people who owners or people w gures at the national, state, or local levthe national, state, or local lev ons with people important to the nation’sple important to the nation’ erty has to be directly tied to an importrty has to be directly tied to an import ed the work for which he or she is knoed the work for which he or l’s important historic work and does notl’s important historic work and d

2.2. em
D
b
D
o
DR
dd
DR
yyddyyy
DR
tt
DR
hh
DR
ee
DR
d
DR
i
DR
sisis
DR
t
DR
iti
DR
nn
DR
cc
DR
tt
DR
iittiii
R
vv
R
eeeee
R
cc
R
hh
RA
aa
R
rr
R
aarraarrraarraaa
R
cc
R
tt
R
eetteetteee
R
rr
R
iirriiirrrii
RA
ssiissiiss
R
tt
R
iittiii
RA
cc
R
ssccsscccssccsss
R
oo
R
k
D
o
D
f
D
a
D
m
DR
a
DR
s
DR
t
DR
e
DR
rr
DR
,r
DR
oo
DR
rr
DR
tt
DR
hhhhh
DR
aa
DR
tt
DR
pp
DR
oo
DR
s
R
s
R
e
R
s
R
s
R
h
R
i
R
gigig
R
hh
R
a
R
r
R
t
R
i
R
sisisis
R
tt
R
ii
R
oo
D
mm
D
pp
D
oo
D
nn
D
ee
D
nn
D
tt
D
ssttssttsss
DR
mm
DR
a
DR
yy
DR
l
DR
alala
DR
cc
DR
kk
DR
ii
DR
nn
DR
dd
DR
ii
DR
vv
DR
ii
DR
d
R
u
R
a
R
l
R
d
R
i
R
sisis
R
t
R
iti
R
n
R
c
R
t
R
iti
R
o
R
5 is a modest example of an Mid5 is a modest example of an Mid --CentCe Curtis Chambers in 1951. Curtis Chambers in 1951. Like other buLike other bu y assembled, and use modern maty assembled, and use mode features: onefeature - and twoo--storiesto
or decorationor deco , asymmesymm
construction in construction in
, s, simple wimple w
ve hve h

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
73 January 2020
CCriterion D/4: That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Integrity Discussion
Building 5 maintains integrity of location, as it remains in its original location. The building maintains integrity of design as it has not undergone any large-scale exterior alterations since its construction and maintains the essential features of form, plan, space, structure, and style. The building retains integrity of setting, upon its construction the majority of East Green Street and the blocks to its direct north and south had been developed with commercial and residential properties and this has not substantially changed since 1951. The building maintains integrity of materials and workmanship due to the retention of the ph ysical elements that date from its construction. The building also maintains integrity of feeling, where the property retains the ability to express itself as an office building constructed in the 1950s. The building no longer retains integrity of association, since its construction the property has changed tenants multiple times, disassociating it with the original tenants the Community Chest and Council.

In summary, while the building retains the requisite integrity for designation, it does not rise to the level of significance required for designation at the national, state or local levels.

5.6 Summary of Evaluation Findings
The five commercial properties within the Project site, 740-750 East Green Street, 770-784 East Green Street, 790 East Green Street, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue, do not appear eligible for listing in the NRHP, CRHR, or local register. All five properties lack important historical associations and architectural significance and do not appear eligible as contributors to an historic distri ct. As such, these properties are not considered historical resources for the purposes of CEQA.

DRAFT
R designation criteriaR design
RHPRHP and CRHR eligibility, tand CRH
err individually or as part of a distrindividually or as p original locationorigina . The building maintains. The building maintains ations since its construction and maintaions since its construc uilding retains integrity of setting, upoetains integrity n i ect north and south had been developedsouth had
tially changed since 1951. The buildintially changed since 1951. tion of the physical elements that dateon of the physical elements that where the property retains the ability to exhe property retains the ability to ex no longer retains integrity of association,tains integrity of associatio disassociating it with the original tenant with the original tenan retains the requisite inretains the requisite in tegrity for desigtegrit nation at the national, state or local levenation at the national, state or mmary of Evaluation Fimary of Evaluation F
rcial properties within the Project sitecial properties within th , 74 Street, 111 South Hudson Avenue,Street, 111 South Hudson Av and 1 HPHP, , CRHRCR , or local registerocal register. All five pro. All fiv cancecance and do not appear eligible aspear eligible as coco dered dered historical resources for the purphistorical resources for

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
74 January 2020
6 Findings and Conclusions

6.1 Summary of Findings
No cultural resources were identified within the Project site as a result of the CHRIS records search, SLF search, extensive archival research, field survey, and property significance evaluations. The properties located at 740-750 East Green Street, 770-784 East Green Street, 790 East Green Street, 111 South Hudson Avenue, and 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue do not appear eligible for NRHP, CRHR, or City designation due to a lack of significant historical associations and architectural merit. Therefore, these properties are not considered historical resources for the purposes of CEQA. Further, no potential indirect impacts to historical resources were identified.

While no surface evidence of cultural resources was identi fied as a result of this study, it is possible that subsurface resources could be encountered/impacted by ground disturbing activities associated with the Project. Recommendations to reduce impacts to undiscovered, subsurface cultural resources are provided below.

6.2 Recommendations
In consideration of the cultural resources investigation, impacts to cultural resources would be less-than-significant. No previous or new cultural resources were identified within the Project site as a result of the current study; therefore, no further management recommendations are necessary beyond standard protection measures to address unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources and human remains (listed below).

UUnanticipated Discovery of Cultural Resources
In the event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed Project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether or not additional study is warranted. Depending upon the significance of the find, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA or Section 106 of the NHPA, additional work such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery may be warranted.

Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains
In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the County Coroner shall be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the MLD from the deceased Native American. The MLD shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. Th e MLD would then determine, in consul tation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains.

DRAFT
RIS records searRIS rec
TThhe properte prope ies located
South Hudson Avenue, and 1South Hudson Av
ationation due to a lack of significant hisdue to a lack of si not considered historical resources not considered historical re fo al resources were identified.al resources were identified. fiedfied asa a result ofof thist study, it is
d by groundground disturbingdisturbi activities ass
scovered, subsurfacesubsurface cultural resourcesc
onsns
investigation, impacts to n, impacts to culturalculturalresourceresour re identified within the in th Project siteProjec as a resar e tions are necessary beyond standard prottions are necessary beyond st s and human remains (listed below).s and human remains (listed be oo
R
ff
R
CC
R
uu
R
ll
R
t
R
u
R
r
R
a
R
l
R
R
R
e
R
s
R
o
R
uu
RA
rr
RA
cc
RA
ee
RA
ss
RA
chaeological resources (sites, features, or cal resources (sites, features, or ct, all construction work occurring within t, all construction work st, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Pst, meeting the Secretary of the I d and determine whether or not additionad and determine whether or not additio eeologist may simply record the find and aologist may simply record the find and a n 106 of the NHPA, additional work sn 106 of the NHPA, additiona may be warranted.may be w
DD
D
ii
D
ss
D
cc
D
oo
D
vv
D
ee
D
r
D
yy
D
o
D
f
D
HH
D
uu
D
mm
D
aa
D
ection 7ection 7

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
75 January 2020
DRAFT

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
76 January 2020
7 Bibliography
AIA Historical Directory of American Architects. 1962. “AIA Historical Directory of American Architects, 1962.” Accessed September 10, 2019.
https://aiahistoricaldirectory.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AHDAA/pages/20677106/1962+American+Arc hitects+Directory
ArchInformation. 2019. “Howard Raymond Lane, architect (1922-1988).” Accessed August 27, 2019. https://www.archinform.net/arch/109310.htm
Ancestry.com. 2019. “John Curtis Chambers.” Accessed September 10, 2019. https://search.ancestry.com/cgi- bin/sse.dll?indiv=1&dbid=3693&h=70390730&tid=&pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=JCs1953&_phstart=s uccessSource
Andrus, Patrick W. and Rebecca H. Shrimpton. 2002. “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.” National Register Bulletin 15. Accessed April 1, 2019.
https://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/pdfs/nrb15.pdf Ashby, G. E., and J. W. Winterbourne. 1966. A Study of Primitive Man in Orange County and Some of its Coastal Areas. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 2(1):3-52.

Bancroft, Hubert Howe. 1885. History of California, Volume III: 1825-1840. A.L. Bancroft & Co., San Francisco.

Basgall, M. E., L. Johnson, and M. Hale. 2002. “An Evaluation of Four Archaeological Sites in the Lead Mountain Training Area, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California.” Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas.

Basgall, M. E., and M. Hall. 1990. Ad aptive Variation in the North-Central Mojave Desert. Paper Presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Las Vegas.

Bean, Lowell, J., and Florence C. Shipek, 1978. “Luiseño,” in California, Robert F. Hazier (ed.), pp. 550-563, Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, W.C. Sturtevant (general editor), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Bean, Lowell J., and Charles R. Smith. 1978. Gabrielino. In California, edited by Robert F. Heizer, pp. 538–549.

Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, William G. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Blackburn, Thomas. 1963. Ethnohistoric Descriptions of Gabrielino Material Culture. Annual Report, Archaeological Survey. University of California, Los Angeles.

Brown, Alan. 2002. A Description of Distant Roads. Original Journals of the First Expedition into California, 1769- 1770 by Juan Crespi. San Diego State University Press.

DRAFT
77106/19677106/
ccessed August 27, 2019. ccessed August 2
r 10, 2019. r 10, 2 https://search.ancestry.comancestr
pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=JCs1953&_pid=&usePUB=true&_phsrc=JCs1953&_ How to Apply the National Register Criteply the Natio
ril 1, 2019.
ulletins/pdfs/nrb15.pdfulletins/pd

6. A Studydy of Primitive Man in Orange Coof Primitive Man in Orange Co gical Society QuarterlyQuar 2(1):32(1):3--52.52.
story of California, Volume III: 1825story of California, Volume III -184 and M. Hale. and M. 2002. “02. An Evaluation of Foation Marine Corps Air Ground Combat CenterMarine Corps Air Ground Combat Cente orps of Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas.of Engineers, Fort Worth, Texas. , and M. Hall. 1990. Adaptive Variatioand M. Hall. 1990. Ad he he 55th Annual Meeting of the Society55th Annual Meeting of th Lowell, J., and Florence C. Shipek, 1978Lowell, J., and Florence C. Shipek, 1978 Handbook of North American IndiaHandbook of North America Washington, D.C. Washing
, and Charles R. Sm, and Charles R. Sm
k of North Amk of North Am
Washingashing

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
77 January 2020
Boscana, G. 1846. “Chinigchinich; A Historical Account of the Origin, Customs, and Traditions of the Indians at the Missionary Establishment of St. Juan Capistrano, Alta California.” In Life in California, by Alfred Robinson, 227–341. New York, New York: Wiley & Putnam.

Byrd, Brian F., and Seetha N. Reddy, 2002. Late Holocene Adaptations along the Northern San Diego Coastline: New Perspectives on Old Paradigms. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Terry L. Jones, pp. 41-62. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

City of Pasadena. 2019. “Heritage: A Short History of Pasadena.” Accessed August 22, 2019. https://www.cityofpasadena.net/about-pasadena/history-of-pasadena/#1970-Present Cleland, Robert Glass. 2005. The Cattle on a Thousand Hills: Southern California, 1850-80, second ed., sixth printing. The Huntington Library, San Marino, California.

Cleland, James H., Andrew L. York, and Lorraine M. Willey. 2007. Piecing Together the Prehistory of Landing Hill:

A Place Remembered. EDAW Cultural Publications No. 3. EDAW, Inc., San Diego.

Dallas, S. F. 1955. The Hide and Tallow Trade in Alta California 1822–1848. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington
Davis, E.L. 1978. The Ancient Californians: Rancholabrean Hunters of the Mojave Lakes Country. Los Angeles, California: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.

The Desert Sun (DS). 1974. “Plans Underway for Project’s Clubhouse.” Newspapers.com: The Desert Sun (Palm Springs, California). May 10, 1974, pg. 23.

Gallegos, D.R. 1987. “San Dieguito-La Jolla: Chronology and Controversy.” San Diego County Archaeological Society, Research Paper No. 1.

Geiger, M., and C. W. Meighan. 1976. As the Padres Saw Them: California Indian Life and Customs as Reported by the Franciscan Missionaries, 1813-1815. Santa Barbara, California: Santa Barbara Mission Archive Library.

Golla, V. 2007. “Linguistic Prehistory.” In California Prehistory: Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by T.L. Jones and K.A. Klar, 71–82. New York, New York: Altamira Press.

Grenda, D. R. 1997. Continuity and Change: 8,500 Years of Lacustrine Adaptation on the Shores of Lake Elsinore: Archaeological Investigations at a Stratified Site in Southern California. Statistical Research, Inc.

Technical Series 59. Tucson, Arizona.

Grimes, Teresa and Christina Chiang. 2009. City of Riverside Modernism Context Statement. Prepared by Christopher A. Joseph & Associates. Accessed August 11, 2019. https://www.riversideca.gov/historic/pdf/Modernism.pdf
Grimes, Teresa. 2010. Late 19th and Early 20th Century Development and Architect in Pasadena NRHP Multiple DRAFT
HoloHolo
tsen Instittsen Ins
August 22, 2019. August 22, 2019
adena/#1970adena/# -PresentPresent
ern California, 1850ern Cal -80, second ed., sixtecond e 2007. 07. Piecing Together thePiecing Togethe Prehistory o ons No. 3. EDAW,EDAW, Inc., San Diego.Inc.,
Alta California 1822Alta C –18481848. Ph.D. disser.
ns: Rancholabrean Hunters of the Mojavlabrean Hunters of the Mojav useum of Los Angeles County.ngeles County
ans Underway for Project’s Clubhouse.” ans Underway for Project’s C May 10, 1974, pg. 23. May 10, 1974, pg. 2
“San Dieguiton Diegu -La Jolla: Chronology and C Jolla: Chronology and C esearch Paper No. 1.aper No. 1.
and C. W. Meighan. 1976. As the Padresand C. W. Meighan. 1976. As th by the Franciscan Missionaries, 1813by the Franciscan Missionaries, 1813-1 Library.Libr
007. “Linguistic Prehistory.”007. “Linguistic Prehistor ones and K.A. Klar, 7ones and K.A. Klar, 7
ContinuContinu

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
78 January 2020
Property Documentation Form.

Griset, S. 1996. “Southern California Brown Ware.” Unpublished PhD dissertation; University of California, Riverside.

Gumprecht, Blake. 1999. The Los Angeles River: Its Life, Death, and Possible Rebirth. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

Hale, M. 2001. “Technological Organization of the Millingstone Pattern in Southern California.” Master’s thesis; California State University, Sacramento.

Hale, M. 2009. “San Diego and Santa Barbara: Socioeconomic Divergence in Southern California.” PhD dissertation; University of California, Davis.

Harrington, J.P. 1934. “A New Original Version of Boscana’s Historical Account of the San Juan Capistrano Indians of Southern California.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 92(4).

Harrington, John P. 1942. Culture Element Distributions: XIX, Central California Coast. Anthropological Records 7:1. University of California Press: Berkeley.

Hector, S.M. 2006. Cultural Resources Study for the Maintenance of Old Mission Dam, Mission Trails Regional Park, San Diego, California. Prepared for the City of San Diego.

Heizer, R. 1978. “Introduction.” In California, edited by R.F. Heizer, 1–6. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, edited by W.C. Sturtevant. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.

Heizer, R. and K.M. Nissen. 1973. The Human Sources of California Ethnography. Berkeley, California: University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Berkeley.

HRG (Historic Resources Group). 2007. Cultural Resources of the Recent Past Historic Context Report. The City of Pasadena, California.

HRG. 2010. Cultural Resources Technical Report: Wilshire Boulevard Temple Master Plan, Los Angeles, California.

December 2010.

Honolulu Star-Bulletin. 1975. “Charles Parsons.” Newspapers.com: The Honolulu Star-Bulletin (Honolulu, Hawaii).

July 28, 1975, pg. 36.

Hoffman, Ogden. 1862. Reports of Land Cases Determined in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: June Term 1853 to June Term 1858, Inclusive. Numa Hubert Publishers, San Francisco, California.

Horak, Katie E., Andrew Goodrich, Alan Hess, and John English. 2015. “LOS ANGELES CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT; Context: Architecture and Engineering; Theme: The Ranch House, 1930-1975; Theme: Housing the Masses, 1880-1975; Sub-Theme: Ranch House Neighborhoods, 1938-1975.” Prepared for City of Los Angeles, Department of City Planning, Office of Historic Resources. Accessed September 11, 2019.

DRAFT
e Joe Jo
ern Californiaern Califo .” Maste
ence in Southern California.” PhD ence in Southern California. istorical Account of the San Juan Capististorical Account of the San Juan Capist s Collections 92(4).Collections 92(4).
ons: XIX, Central California Coast. al Califor Anthro
ey.ey.
dy for the Maintenance ofhe Maintenance of Old Mission DaOld Mission D pared for the City of San Diego.e City of San Diego.

California, edited by R.F. Heizer, 1California, edited by R.F. Hei –6. Ha turtevant. Waturtevant. Washington, D.C.: Smithsoniashington, D.C.:
n. 1973. The Human Sources of Californn. 1973. The Human Sources of Califo rchaeological Research Facility, Berkeleyhaeological Research Facility, Berkeley esources Group). 2007. rces Group). 2007. Cultural Resourc dena, California. dena, California
010. 010. Cultural Resources Technical RepoCultural Resources Technical Rep December 2010.Dec
tartar--Bulletin. 1975. “CharleBulletin. 1975. “Char
8, 1975, pg. 36.8, 1975, pg. 36.

62. Rep62. Rep

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
79 January 2020
Johnson, J.R., and J.G. Lorenz. 2006. “Genetics, Linguistics, and Prehistoric Migrations: An Analysis of California Indian Mitochondrial DNA Lineages.” Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 26:33–64.

Johnston, Bernice E. 1962. California’s Gabrielino Indians. Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund 8, Southwest Museum, Los Angeles.

King, Chester D. 1994. Native American Placenames in the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, Agoura Hills. Topanga Anthropological Consultants, California.

Kroeber, Alfred J. 1925. Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

Kyle, Douglas E. 2002. Historic Spots in California . 5th ed. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

Laylander, D. 2000. Early Ethnography of the Californias, 1533-1825. Salinas, California: Coyote Press Archives of California Prehistory.

Lightfoot, K.G. 2005. Indians, missionaries, and merchants: the legacy of colonial encounters on the California frontiers. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.

Los Angeles Conservancy. 2019. “Office Building.” Accessed August 27, 2019. https://www.laconservancy.org/locations/office-building Los Angeles Times (LAT). 1938. “Also Attractive.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California).

February 13, 1938, pg. 63.

LAT. 1940. “Design of New Home.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). July 28, 1940, pg.

67. LAT. 1941. “Cheerful.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). September 29, 1941, pg. 73.

LAT. 1942. “Higher-Priced Houses Sought.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). June 21, 1942, pg. 34.

LAT. 1950a. “Two Apartment Project Started.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). February 26, 1950, pg. 109.

LAT. 1950b. “Moller Heads Pasadena CC.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). March 8, 1950, pg. 50.

LAT. 1951a. “New Community Service Center Given Preview.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). May 6, 1951, pg. 44
LAT. 1951b. “Retiring Chest Leader Honored by Pasadenans.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). May 8, 1951, pg. 48.

LAT. 1955a. “Contemporary Style Homes Spearhead Sales at Tract.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). April 17, 1955, pg. 153.

DRAFT
NationalNationa
erican Ethnologyerican Ethnolo Bulletin 7
ord University Press, ord Uni Stanford, Californnford, C 33--1825. Salinas, California: Coyote Press1825. Salinas, California: Coyote Press chants: the legacy of colonial encountersgacy of co
f California Press.f Cal
ing.” Accessed August 27, 2019. Accessed August 27,
cations/officefice--buildingbuilding
o AttracAttractive.” tiv Newspapers.com: apers.com Los Angele

63. 63.

Home.” Home Newspapers.com: pers. Los Angeles Tingeles
rful.” Newspapers.com: pers.com: Los Angeles Time
“Higher“Higher-Priced Houses Sought.” Priced Houses Sought.” NewspapN 1942, pg. 34. 1942,
950a. “Two Apartment Project Started950a. “Two Apartment Project 6, 1950, pg. 109. 6, 1950
oller Heads Pasadoller Heads Pasad

50. 50.

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
80 January 2020
LAT. 1955b. “In Pasadena.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). December 25, 1955, pg.

22. LAT. 1959. “New Company Established by L.A. Architect.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). July 26, 1959, pg. 119.

LAT. 1962. “Firm Marks Anniversary.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). October 21, 1962, pg. 137.

LAT. 1962a. “Architect Firm of Lane-Schlick Changes Name.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). May 26, 1963, pg. 116.

LAT. 1962b. “Apartment Building to Rise in Studio City.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California).

October 21, 1962, pg. 134.

LAT. 1962c. “15-Story Apartment Hotel Planned for Santa Monica.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). December 9, 1962, pg. 151.

LAT. 1972. “Rudolph will Design Lake California.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California).

April 23, 1971, pg. 143.

LAT. 1976. “Builder Evald C. Moller.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California). March 28, 1976, pg. 115.

LAT.1988. “Services Held for Architect Howard Lane.” Newspapers.com: Los Angeles Times (Los Angeles, California).

November 13, 1988, pg. 157.

McAlester, V.S. 2015. A Field Guide to American Houses (Revised): The Definitive Guide to Identifying and Understanding America's Domestic Architecture. New York City, New York: Alfred A Knopf.

McCawley, William 1996. The First Angelinos, the Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press, Banning.

Morgan, W. 2004. The Abrams Guide to American House Styles. New York City, New York: Harry N Abrams Inc.

NETR (Nationwide Environmental Title Research LLC). 2019. Historic Aerial Photographs of East Green Street, South Oak Knoll Ave, and South Hudson Avenue, Pasadena, CA dating from 1952, 1953, 1964, 1972, 1977, 1980, 1994, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016. Accessed August 14, 2019. https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer
Northwest Economic Associates (NEA) and Chester King. 2004. Ethnographic Overview of the Angeles National Forest: Tataviam and San Gabriel Mountain Serrano Ethnohistory. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

O’Conner, P. 1993. Architectural/Historical Development of the City of Pasadena: Historic Context/Property Type Report.

DRAFT
CCaliforniaaliforn
m: m: Los Angeles TimesLos Angeles (Los A
com: com: Los Angeles TimesLo (Los Angeles, Califos Angel Monica.” Nnica.” Newspapers.com: apers.c Los Angeles T

1. Newspapers.com: Newsp Los Angeles Timess Angel (L
wspapers.com: om: Los Angeles Timesngeles Times (Los (Lo rchitect Howard Lane.” rchitect Howard Newspapers.comNewsp 8, pg. 157. 8, pg. 15
A Field Guide to American Houses (RevField Guide to American Houses (Rev ding America's Domestic Architecturerica's Domestic Architecture. N. N William 1996. The First Angelinos, the GaWilliam 1996. The First Angeli anning.anning
an, W. 2004. an, W. 2 The Abrams Guide to Ams Guide to Am onwide Environmental Titleonwide Environmental T
Oak Knoll Ave, and SOak Knoll Ave, and
9980, 1994, 2080, 1994, 20
ttps://wttps://w

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
81 January 2020
Old Pasadena. 2016. “History of Old Pasadena.” Accessed August 22, 2019. https://www.oldpasadena.org/about/history-of-old-pasadena/ O’Neil, Stephen. 2002. The Acjachemen in the Franciscan Mission System: Demographic Collapse and Social Change. Masters thesis, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton.

Pasadena Independent (PI). 1961. “Evald C. Moller Heads Group for Recreation.” Newspapers.com: Pasadena Independent (Pasadena, California). July 10, 1961, pg. 20.

Perkins, Arthur, B. 1957. “Rancho San Francisco: A Study of a California Land Grant.” The Historical Society of Southern California Quarterly. June 1957. Electronic document:

PI. 1963. “E.C. Moller Commission Term Ends.” Newspapers.com: Pasadena Independent (Pasadena, California).

June 22, 1963, pg. 3.

PI. 1967. “Foothill Group Gives Family Safety Valves.” Newspapers.com: Pasadena Independent (Pasadena, California). October 19, 1967, pg. 26.

Reid, Hugo. 1926. The Indians of Los Angeles County. Privately printed, Los Angeles.

Rogers, M.J. 1945. “An Outline of Yuman Prehistory.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 1:167–198.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1887. “Pasadena.” Edition June 1887. Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1888. “Pasadena.” Edition March 1888. Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1889. “Pasadena.” Edition March 1889. Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1890. “Pasadena.” Edition June 1890. Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1894. “Pasadena.” Edition October 1894. Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1903. “Pasadena.” Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1910. “Pasadena.” Accessed September 10, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1931. “Pasadena.” Edition 1930-1931. Sheet 132. Accessed August 14, 2019.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. 1951. “Pasadena.” Edition 1930-October 1951. Sheet 132. Accessed August 14, 2019.

San Francisco Planning Department. 2010. San Francisco Modern Architecture and Landscape Design: 1935- 1970 Historic Context Statement. The City of San Francisco Planning Department. San Francisco, California.

Shoup, Donald. 2018. Parking and the City. New York, New York: Routledge. spapers.spaper
d Grant.” The Historical Socid Grant.” The H
asadena asaden Independent (Pasadena, Califosadena
wspapers.com: apers.co Pasadena asaden Independent (P
ounty.ounty. PrivatelyPriv printed, Los Angeles.Los An
Prehistory.” ry.” Southwestern Journal of AntSouthwestern Journal of Ant Pasadena.”Editionon June 1887. AccessedJune 1887. Accessed 18881888. “Pasadena.”“Pasadena EditionMarMarch 1888. Ac Maps.Maps.18891 . “Pasadena.”adena.”EditionEdi March 1arch 1 rance Maps.18901890.. “Pasadena.”“Pas EditionJuJ
e Insurance e Insurance Maps.Maps.18941 . “Pasadena.”“Pasad Ed orn Fire Insurance Maps.orn Fir 19031903. “Pasadede
ire Insurance Maps.ire Insu 19101910. “
rance Maprance Maps. 19s. 19
MaMa

CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL REPORT
740-790 EAST GREEN STREET MIXED-USE PROJECT, PASADENA
12101
82 January 2020
Sparkman, Philip. 1908. The Cultural of the Luiseño Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8:187–234. Berkeley.

Statesman Journal (SJ). 1996. “Evald C. Moller.” Newspapers.com: Statesman Journal (Salem, Oregon). May 25, 1996, pg. 20.

The Honolulu Advertiser (THA). 1972. “Important Grand Opening.” Newspapers.com: The Honolulu Advertiser (Honolulu, Hawaii). June 24, 1972, pg. 48.

THA. 1974. “Come Home to Paradise.” Newspapers.com: The Honolulu Advertiser (Honolulu, Hawaii). September 1, 1974, pg. 81.

THA. 1975. “Parsons.” Newspapers.com: The Honolulu Advertiser (Honolulu, Hawaii). July 26, 1975, pg. 10.

UCSB (University of California, Santa Barbra). 2019. Historic Aerial Photographs of East Green Street, South Oak Knoll Ave, and South Hudson Avenue, Pasadena, CA dating from 1927, 1936, 1944, 1956, 1968, and 1971. Map & Imagery Laboratory (MIL) UCSB Library, Electronic Resource, http://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder. Accessed August 14, 2019.

Valley Times. 1959. “Valley Architects Elect Officers.” Newspapers.com: Valley Times (North Hollywood, CA).

January 5, 1959, pg. 12.

Visalia Times Delta. 2010. “Edward Ray Schlick.” Accessed August 27, 2019. https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/visaliatimesdelta/obituary.aspx?n=edward-ray- schlick&pid=146831967
Wallace, William. 1955. Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214–230.

Warren, Claude N. 1968. “Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast.” In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by Cynthia Irwin-Williams, pp. 1-14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology No. 1. Portales.

Warren, C.N., G. Siegler, and F. Dittmer. 2004. “Paleoindian and Early Archaic Periods.” In Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology of Metropolitan San Diego: A Historic Properties Background Study. Prepared for the Metropolitan Wastewater Department, City of San Diego. Encinitas, California: ASM Affiliates.

Waugh, John C. 2003. On the Brink of Civil War: The Compromise of 1850 and How It Changed the Course of American History. Scholarly Resources Inc., Wilmington, Delaware.

White, Raymond. 1963. Luiseño Social Organization. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 48:91-194. Berkeley.

DRAFT
The HonolThe Ho
rtiserrtiser (Honolulu, Hawaii).(Honolulu Se
Honolulu, Hawaii). July 26, 1975, pg. 10Honolulu, Hawaii). July 26, 1975, p Aerial Photographs ofAerial Photographs of East Green Streett A dating from 1927ating from 1927,, 1936, 1944, 195619
brary, Electronic Resource, ctronic Resou
meFinder. Accessed August 14, 2019ed Augu .
fficers.” ers.” Newspapers.com:Newspape Valley Times (alley Tim Ray Schlick.” Accessed August 27, 2019cessed August 27, 2019 obituaries/visaliatimesobituaries/visaliatimesdelta/obituary.aspdelta/o 6767
Suggested Chronology for Southern CalifSuggested Chronology for Southern Ca ogy 11:21411:214–230.

N. 1968. “Cultural Tradition and EcologN. 1968. “Cultural Trad haic Prehistory in the Western United Stahaic Prehistory in the Western Mexico University Contributions in AnthroMexico University Contributions in An en, C.N., G. Siegler, and F. Dittmeren, C.N., G. Siegler, and F. Ditt . 200 Archaeology of Metropolitan SanArchaeology of Metropolitan tropolitan Wastewater Detropolitan Wastewater D
003. On the B003. On the B
story. Sstory. S
Appendix A
CConfidential Records Search Results

DRAFT
Appendix B
DPR forms for 740-750 East Green Street, 770-784 East
Green Street, 790 East Green Street, 111 South Hudson
Avenue, and 118 South Oak Knoll Avenue

DRAFT
k Knk Kn

Page 1 of 20 ends

Pasadena City CouncilSeptember 18, 2023

Pasadena City Council
September 18, 2023