02/26/2023
SUPPLEMENTAL
CORRESPONDENCE
ITEM 15
Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
jvyyi Melissa Anderson _.-.^,,v.^v
Friday, February 23, 2024 4:08 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques,Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Zl" Sean B. : . ,, ..
Saturday, February 24, 2024 9:49 AM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siquesjoaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important !^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Colleen Dunn Bates •' ...i>
Saturday, February 24, 2024 3:58 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from;am why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you fcnowthe content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
As a lifelong walker and longtime Pasadenan (and editor of the book Hometown Pasadena)\ am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you for your dedication to this beautiful city.
Colleen
Colleen Dunn Bates
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
^. ^y..1/> Philip Burns
Friday, February 23, 2024 4:40 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Philip Burns
Philip Burns
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Lake C. . •
Saturday, February 24, 2024 3:52 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from ' '•n why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kevin Cheng
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:32 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; hlampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta. Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jenna Cobb
Friday, February 23, 2024 6:09 PM
Madison, Steve; cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content . Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more ....
Dear City Council members,
As a resident of district 2, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Jenna Cobb
CA 91106
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Sam Davidson • .com>
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:02 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siquesjoaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Nathan Dillingham ^ _...
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:38 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Nathan Dillingham
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Ngoc Nicole Dinh
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:42 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from 1 crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Ngoc Nicole Dinh, D.0
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
theresa doran
Friday, February 23, 2024 6:10 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] I
1. [/\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from 1 crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sent from my iPhone
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
David E. _ _...._...^.,..
Friday, February 23, 2024 4:38 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve
Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
David and Tracy Erickson
District 3 residents
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Genette Foster
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:20 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Get Outlook for IPS
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Andy Fung
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:37 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
Andy Fung
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Gabrielle >
Friday, February 23, 2024 5:23 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you /rnowthe content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second,take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Gabrielle, Pasadena pedestrian and cyclist
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Valeria Garcia __^-y,,,aii.>-uin>
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:39 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from 1 crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Best,
Valeria Garcfa
Sent from my iPhone
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
y Edward Gonzales ^-.._-.-.
Friday, February 23, 2024 10:04 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siquesjoaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear Pasadena City Council members,
My name is Edward Gonzales, and I work at JPL and recreate/eat/drink in Pasadena frequently as a cyclist and a walker. I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
Edward Gonzales
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Scott Habermehl
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:42 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Best regards,
Scott Habermehl
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Erin Higashi • i>
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:39 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; hlampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
> Margaret Ho <
Friday, February 23, 2024 5:42 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting ISome people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^} CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Margaret Ho
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
bonnied
Friday, February 23, 2024 4:09 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siquesjoaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected].
Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from 3 crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
Bonnie James
District 5 resident
Sent from myiPhone
4 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
,1 Erin Kanner
Saturday, February 24, 2024 1:22 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Erin Kanner
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kathryn Kroger ''
Friday, February 23, 2024 6:1 1 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve
Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from ,.) why this is important
<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification>
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn more...
<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0010263>.
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets.
The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
Kathryn Kroger
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
J Latt " .. .......
Saturday, February 24, 2024 1:01 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting s
Some people who received this message don't often get email [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
As a cyclist who rides daily in Pasadena and does not own a car, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Jenna Latt
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
> Casey Law <
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:18 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to work and shop in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Casey Law
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Carly Lopez ^ ^ - ^,
Friday, February 23, 2024 6:41 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Laura Luebbert • >
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:36 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [A! CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that a re lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
--J-^- 3" Nandagopal Manoj
Friday, February 23, 2024 5:33 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
g Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second,take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Nandagopal Manoj,
Graduate student at Caltech
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
cityclerk
Friday, February 23, 2024 5:44 PM
Iraheta, Alba; Jomsky, Mark; Robles, Sandra; Sabha, Tamer; McMillan,Acquanette (Netta); Kenebrew, Jerice; Soo, Christine; Haskett, John FW: Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting From: Topher Mathers -
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 5:43:46 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada) To: cityclerk <[email protected]>; [email protected] < +correspondence@cityofpasadena .net>; +JSiques@cityofpasadena. net < +JSiques@cityofpasadena .net>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; +jerivas@cityof pasadena.net <[email protected]>; +j [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [Al CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Andrew Medina -...-.^.. i-Tuyyiiidii.(-uiii>
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:22 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important l/\\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Ashley Mercado
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:56 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting ^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more.
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
xAshley Mercado | Director of Strategic Engagement
a: 175 N Euclid Ave, Pasadena, CA 91101
o: 626-229-9750 e: ashJev^gQdayQne.org
Day One builds vibrant, healthy cities by advancing
public health, empowering youth, and igniting change
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
jason michael _^-.--__-__.n>
Saturday, February 24, 2024 7:38 AM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; h^ampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from _ ,- i. Learn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, 1 improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
J
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jesus Molina
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:17 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Siques, Joaquin; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I Some people who received this message don't often get email [email protected]. Learn why this is importantI ^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
> Richard Murphy
Friday, February 23, 2024 8:03 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting s
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important /^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Sharon Norman
Saturday, February 24, 2024 12:25 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important m
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Date: Feb. 23, 2024
RE: Agenda Item #15 - Pedestrian Transportation Action Plan Honorable Mayor Gordo and City Councilmembers: C/Tv^V-ULtRK I was fortunate to be named to the Pasadena Walks Advisory Committee that provided input into the Pedestrian Transportation Action Plan. Pasadena is a beautiful city, and it is important for us to provide opportunities to encourage walking and make walking as safe as possible.
The advisory committee was made up of a variety of people representing different city council districts and different constituent groups. It was an engaged group of people that I enjoyed meeting and working with.
Now that the final draft of the plan has been put forward, I would like to compliment the Department of Transportation and consultants who developed the plan and identified corridors and neighborhoods where there is a critical need for improvements to protect pedestrians.
At the same time, I would like to mention several opportunities not included in the plan that should be addressed - either in this plan or in another form by the city.
Need for more outreach and engagement to neighborhoods and businesses impacted by recommendations - before a project is approved. As we have seen with the recent two-way cycle track on Union and the roundabout on North Hill, impacted residents are speaking out after the projects have been completed - when it is too late. On the Union project, residents have been raising concerns about parking reductions that negatively impact businesses like Vroman's and safety concerns about the cycle track's design.
Residents on North Hill are reporting seeing fire trucks and other first responders having problems navigating the tight clearance.
Need for more streetlights and concern about security in Pasadena. Many of the focus groups I attended mentioned that the lack of streetlights is a major hurdle that prevents people feeling safe to walk at night. Councilmember Felicia Williams is a lonely advocate on the city council who pushes for the use of funding available for "Safe Streets to School" to help place new streetlights in several areas. Where are the other councilmembers on this issue? The fact remains that too many of our neighborhood streets are dark at night. The city needs to make this a priority.
When it comes to walking, hiking, running and playing, the Rose Bowl area is the primary place people go to enjoy these activities. And yet, the Pasadena Walks Project totally ignores this important corridor. Even though this area is where many accidents happen, there was no outreach to people walking at the Rose Bowl and the final draft totally ignores this corridor. We need to stop speeding cars, make it safer to cross streets in the area and better separate pedestrians from bicyclists in the ring path around the Rose Bowl.
Sidewalks are mentioned as an important component of walking in Pasadena, but the fact is many sidewalks are in bad shape. Residents have to proactively take photos and send it in to be evaluated in a process that is little known by the average resident. There is no program in the city that I am aware of to fix dangerous and broken sidewalks proactively without resident reporting. Green Street is a good example of a dangerous corridor with many uprooted sidewalks.
I hope the city council will continue to be open to addressing these issues - either in the walking plan or in other ways.
Ken Perry
Keep Pasadena Moving
East Pasadena 91104
Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Britta Piotrowski _^ . .__m>
Friday, February 23, 2024 7:41 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Madison, Steve; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques,Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more.
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. I believe part of the problem is cars running red lights. We desperately need to crack down on this huge problem!
We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Britta Piotrowski
Pasadena, CA
Life of the Party Catering/Special Events
Party Host Helpers Staffing Services
Pasadena Showcase House for the Arts-Hospitality
Pasadena Heritage-Volunteer
Orange Grove Village-Board Member, HOA
"Find something you are passionate about
and keep tremendously interested in it."
Julia Child
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Joe Piotrowski _ t>
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:39 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
fA1 CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, 1 improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sent from my iPad
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kathryn Plant
Friday, February 23, 2024 4:36 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am very glad that Pasadena is considering a plan to improve routes for pedestrians, and I hope that the city approves a plan that will make Pasadena eligible for the new federal funding opportunities for these improvements. I want to be able to walk to as many of my errands as possible. Walking is good for my health and also lets me talk to more neighbors, which makes me feel like part of the community. By the way, it's probably good for the local economy too--1 walked to the post office today and spontaneously stopped in another store on the way, which I wouldn't have done if I was driving.
I agree with and support the comments by the Pasadena Complete Streets Coalition, which I have copied below:
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Best regards,
Kathryn
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Raquel Quiroz i>
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:46 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siquesjoaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from i Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from 1 crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sent from my iPhone
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Denise Robb
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:32 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [&,] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more ....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Denise Robb
Pasadena ca 91106
Sent from my iPhone
Denise Robb, Ph.D.
Professor of Political Science,
Pierce College; and
Joshua's Mommy
1 "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities/'
(Possibly Voltaire)
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Kristin Roberts
Friday, February 23, 2024 8:45 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ft\} CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am a Pasadena District 2 resident, and I regularly walk in my own neighborhood as well as in other areas of Pasadena. Walking is an important form of transportation for my family.
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Kristin Roberts
Pasadena
^
1 RECEIVED
MTG. DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 2024 ^Q^ FEB 24 PH 3: 54
TO: MAYOR VICTOR GORDO, VICE MAYOR STEVE MADISON, C^UNdl, MEMBERS 7YRON HAMPTON, JUSTIN JONES, JASON LYONS, QG^^ffS^^fiff^^MAS
AND FELICIA WILLIAMS
SUBJECT: ITEM # 15 - ADOPTION OF THE FINAL DRAFT PASADENA PEDESTRIAN
TRANSPORTATION ACTION PLAN
FROM: MARSHA V. ROOD, FAICP; CENTRAL DISTRICT RESIDENT marsharoodOearthlink.net I would like to offer the following comments on the proposed Plan:
(1) Labeling the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Action Plan December 2023 ("PTAP") a "pedestrian action plan" is misleading and diverts attention and resources away from the immediately needed on-the-ground pedestrians improvements, especially in Pasadena's denser mixed use areas. Although the Southern California Association of Governments awarded the City a grant in 2018 to update the 2006 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan for a Livable and Walkable Community, the PTAP does not do that. That does not mean the PTAP should be discarded; it is an important step forward to address safety at pedestrian crossings along major traffic corridors. But it should be renamed for what it is. The PTAP is the third in a series of City Department of Transportation plans aimed at improving pedestrian safety at pedestrian crossings along major traffic corridors; the first two - "City of Pasadena Pedestrian Safety Study at Signalized Intersections; (2011), and "Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Guidance" {2Q\b) - were more aptly named.
(2) The City must install basic pedestrian improvements NOW that can be implemented in the very near term. In a 2021 study, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration named Pasadena the 8th deadliest city in the country for pedestrians, by the U. S.
Department of Transportation. In view of this reality, the PTAP is inadequate. Implementation 1 of the PTAP wilt take 10 to 15 years to implement and cost upwards of $30 million. In view of the pedestrian death and injury crisis in Pasadena, we cannot wait that long. Spending much less money and taking much less time to do a real Pedestrian Plan would go a long way toward meeting the challenge. The bulk of basic pedestrian improvements can be implemented in the very near term, are of modest cost, have short lead times and can be phased in to match funding availability. Examples include continental crosswalks, re-timed traffic signals, longer pedestrian crossing times, pedestrian diagonal scrambles (like old Pasadena), bulb-outs and sidewalk corner curb ramps.
(3) Real Pedestrian Plans are broader documents and focus on connections and linkages that build unique places - called "Placemaking." Safety is a very important part of real Pedestrian Plans but cannot be successfully achieved by focusing solely on safety.
Placemaking views a place in its entirety, rather than zeroing in on isolated components.
Different disciplines working together are vital for making great places, but it is nobod/s job at City Hall to orchestrate this. Putting in improvements silo-by-silo and hoping for the best is not a plan. A real Pedestrian Plan may be eligible for funding as part of the "$760,000 "Active Transportation Plan" grant awarded by the U. S. Department of Transportation to the City in late 2023.
(4) Pasadena should put pedestrian improvements where most of the pedestrians are.
According to the PTAP, pedestrians are primarily in the densest core of Pasadena - the Central District and adjacent areas. However, the PTAP pedestrian improvements will go only to eleven major traffic corridors in the City. Arguably, over the past several decades, Pasadena has been predominately car-centric when making mobility improvements. As a result, it will take intentional and active planning for the City to improve the infrastructure for 2 walking and bicycling. Walkability is the soft underbelly of urbanism - pedestrian improvements are essential for making denser mixed use areas work, not solely for the purpose of reducing car-pedestrian injuries and deaths. (5) Effective pedestrian improvements are more than street decoration - pedestrian improvements serve as important infrastructure for pedestrians as roadways and traffic signals do for cars. Road Diets/Complete Streets are an example of when these two things come together, creating a more organized and safer way to get around for cars, bicycles and pedestrians.
In conclusion, /'/ is crucial for the health and economic well-being of the city to develop a real Pedestrian plan with a schedule and realistic funding sources for the denser, mixed areas of the City such as the Central District. These improvements will better accommodate Pasadena's growing populations in targeted growth areas and better fulfill Pasadena's three- decades-old promise to be a City where you can circulate without cars. 3 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
linda ross
Saturday, February 24, 2024 8:40 AM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important &J CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is afe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more ....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Linda Ross LCSW, Ph.D
LIMITS OF CONFIDENTIALITY
If you are not intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, notify sender immediately by reply e mail and delete this e-mail and attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them.
TECHNOLOGICAL LIMITS OF CONFIDENTIALITY
1 Current technological changes have impacted the previously confidential nature of electronics. If you send me email or ask me to respond to you via email, understand it may be intercepted by others.
Going forward, if you communicate by email, I will understand you have read and understood this statement and it's contents, and accept these conditions of communication. 2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Carl Selkin
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:49 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting 1 Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important '%
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
Now that I have a new knee, I can walk more frequently to enjoy Pasadena neighborhoods where I can meet new and old friends. More than a few times while my walking was compromised, I had to struggle across some well-marked intersections as drivers, oblivious to me, raced to violate a crosswalk or turn right on red or just as the light turned green. So it was more than the disability that hobbled my walking. Fear was another obstacle. It would be great if I don't have to employ my new agility to leap out of danger. These recommendations from Complete Streets will help further that expectation.
So, I am pleased to sign onto this letter provided by the Complete Streets Coalition.
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you,
Carl Selkin
Pasadena District 5
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Michael Siegel " ' m>
Saturday, February i-i, ^ui-^ ->.^-> nvi
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Revise 2024 Pedestrian Plan
Some people who received this message don't often get email fromLearn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
City Council,
Please make some changes to the Pedestrian Plan and then adopt, good transportation policy takes into account all modes of transport - the more included, the better for everyone, including drivers like myself.
Its been the deadliest time for those outside a car - please prioritize dangerous intersections.
With resources and funding always an issue, to get impactful change across the city, please institute a quick build policy.
Thanks!
Mike
91103
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Stephen summe _ i>
Friday, February 23, 2024 9:08 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siquesjoaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from .^.-o...„...—...- _ rn why this is important at
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
[/\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, 1 improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sent from my iPhone
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Svoboda, Josef ...__„.
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:06 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve
Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting ^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. I am a Pasadena resident, commuting daily to Caltech on bike on California Blvd.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Best regards,
JosefSvoboda,Ph.D.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Thanos T
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:47 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Respectfully,
ThanosTrezos
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Philip Taylor __ ::1· .. -.. -~Jm>
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:36 PM
Madison, Steve; cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Williams, Felicia; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Jones, Justin; Hampton, Tyron; Gordo, Victor Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important ,&,] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the con afe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more ....
Dear City Council members, I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes. First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger. Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years. Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program. In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Please learn from what Hoboken has already done. We need better pedestrian and cycling infrastructure immediately.
This means taking away space from cars and giving it to other forms of transportation. As an emergency physician, I am well aware of the damage that cars and car infrastructure does to our society. Please use common sense, and make our streets safer.
Philip Taylor, DO
Pasadena, CA 91104
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
--'- 3" Linh Tran
Friday, February 23, 2024 2:38 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Reid Uhrich
Friday, February 23, 2024 4:20 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques.Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
j Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important %
[Al CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Thank you in advance for your action on this matter.
Your constituent,
Reid Uhrich
1 Iraheta. Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Gerrian Wuts
Saturday, February 24, 2024 9:28 AM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting [Some people who received this message don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button.
Learn
more...<https://mydoit.cityofpasadena.net/sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB00102 63>.
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from 1 crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Intersection Marengo and glenarm. Traffic light for pedestrian crossing glenarm from north side of street to Blair does not work. It only works from south side to north. Cars make a right turn from Marengo to glenarm on red and pedestrians are in the crosswalk. We need a no turn on red.
Glenarm pedestrian zebra in front of Armstrong nursery needs a crossing light. Cars run through the crossing even when I am walking with 3 lights on myself to be as visible as possible.
Marengo crossing and Bellevue drive on the way to wholefoods needs more flashing lights.
People just drive through when someone is on the crosswalk and lights are flashing on the ground.
Cars take right turn on Green street and el Molino while I am crossing and have a white light.
I walk a lot and cars turn on red even when I have the right to cross. Or we both have the go ahead and then they wave at you. In other words you just wait so I miss my white light and the count starts and I have to run across or moss my light cause someone in a car thinks they have more rights to cross first. I drive too but I don't behave like I own the place Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
2 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Blake Wyatt , , __,........„...
Friday, February 23, 2024 3:06 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting I
KSome people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Blake Wyatt, P.E.
1 Iraheta, Alba
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Claire Zeng
Friday, February 23, 2024 10:27 PM
cityclerk; PublicComment-AutoResponse; Hampton, Tyron; Williams, Felicia; Jones, Justin; Masuda, Gene; Rivas, Jessica; Lyon, Jason; Gordo, Victor; Madison, Steve Siques, Joaquin
Please Revise the 2024 Pasadena Pedestrian Plan Before Adopting Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important AUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the conleni: 1s 1 eport phish using the Phish Alert Button. Learn more ....
Dear City Council members,
I am writing to ask that you refrain from approving the Pasadena Pedestrian Transportation Plan without some minor but very important changes.
First, please make sure that the plan includes a requirement that the most dangerous intersections get priority. This is just common sense. Fourteen pedestrians were killed on Pasadena's streets from 2018 through 2022 (the last five year period for which data is available), and another 35 were seriously injured. We KNOW where pedestrians are in the most danger.
Second, take a look at the cities that have responded most effectively to deaths and injuries on their streets. The strategies they have used are known as "quick builds." Hoboken has not had a pedestrian death for seven years.
Those two important steps will put Pasadena in a position to access funding for those projects from the Federal Safe Streets for All Program.
In the future, I ask also that the city move in the direction of taking a comprehensive approach to transportation planning that considers where people need to go, and ALL the ways they can get there, including on foot. Good transportation planning can support our local economy, improve our health by getting us out of our cars (and reducing deaths and injuries from crashes), and strengthen our connections to our neighbors and the wider community. I want to live in a city where there's an interconnected network of streets that are lovely and safe to walk on, whether it's for a trip to buy milk or a meander around a neighborhood.
Regards,
Claire Zeng
Pasadena district 7 resident
1