Cities Index.
AR 16 SUPP CORR CORRESPONDENCE

Pasadena City Council
October 21, 2024

Document
AR 16 SUPP CORR CORRESPONDENCE
Meeting
October 21, 2024
Body
Pasadena City Council
Original file
348 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ww2.cityofpasadena.net. That file is the official record.

McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Selina Ho
Monday, October 21, 2024 3:08 PM
PublicComment-AutoResponse
10/21/24 Agenda Item #16--No on Prop 36
Some people who received this message don't often get email fromLearn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you fcnoM/the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.

Hi,
My name is Selina and I am a constituent of District 2. I'm writing to urge you to oppose agenda item #16.

I have seen first-hand how over-policing and mass incarceration have impacted Pasadena and we must continue to invest more into care and services for our community instead of punishment.

In Pasadena, Prop 47 dollars have helped fund Flintridge Center and LearningWorks—organizations working to help people get and stay on their feet—as well as services that police, firefighters, and public health departments use for unhoused people in Pasadena and substance use disorder programs in Pasadena. Prop 36 could gut that funding.

Pasadena communities deserve to feel and be safe. Prop 36 will dangerously veer Pasadena away from safety. Proposition 36 will roll back Proposition 47, which in 10 years has been successful by all measures at reducing incarceration, reducing recidivism, and delivering millions of dollars to services for Pasadena residents.

Thankyou,
Selina Ho
10/21/2024
Item 16
1 VeraINSTITUTE
OF .JUSTICE
October 21, 2024
Pasadena City Council

RECEIVED
?82!iOCT21 PN 3^48
CJTY CL£RK
CITY OSr PASADENA Via email: vgordo(5)cityofpasadena.net: smadison(a)citvofDasadena.net; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; thampton(5)cifryofpasadena.net; fwilliams(5)citvofpasadena.net; nones(5)cityofpasadena.net.

CC: bharveyw(5)citvofpasadena.net; [email protected]; [email protected]: ianastewart(£>citvofpasadena.net; amellem(®citvofpasadena.net.

Re: In Opposition to Item 16: Motion, Entitled, "ALLOWS FELONY CHARGES AND INCREASES SENTENCES FOR CERTAIN DRUG AND THEFT CRIMES" Dear Pasadena City Council,
My name is Michelle Parris. I am program director ofVera California, a local initiative of the Vera Institute of Justice, a national non-profit and non-partisan organization, which uses the power of data and research to drive effective policies for safe, healthy, and thriving communities. I write to urge the Council to oppose Iteni 16 and Proposition 36.

Instead of funding the care first programs which are proven to prevent crime in Pasadena - things like victims' services, drug treatment, homelessness prevention, and K-12 school programs - Prop 36 would strip more than $100 million each year in for those vital services.1 In Los Angeles County, these programs have had excellent results:

The rate of new convictions for people who participate in these programs is more than four times lower than that of people coming out of state prison. o Only 10 percent of people in the county's programs faced a new criminal conviction in the years after incarceration, compared to almost 42 percent rate for people coming out of prison.2
Pasadena itself - including its police department, fire department, and public health department - is at risk of losing funding for critical and proven effective programs if Prop 36 passes. For example:

Pasadena's police departinent received $2.5 million in funds at risk from Prop 36 for job training and drug treatment.s
Pasadena's fire departinent, public health department, and Huntington Hospital received $1.1 million to fund a program that will help one third of unhoused Pasadenans off the street and into the housing and drug treatment they need. 4 • The Pasadena Unified School District received $1.76 million to support youth programming throughout the Pasadena Unified School District.s Far from addressing homelessness and drug use, Prop 36 would worsen drug use in Los Angeles by stripping funding from successful treatment programs and sending more people to jail and prison. Overdoses in California prisons have doubled in recent years, and people leaving jail and prison are up to 129 tinies more likely to overdose.6 631» S Spring Sfroat. .K30UA, I.OB A r^dus, Cft liK»)lttSa4»(Xl6Bf-2(3 416 OGP519/^2024 Item 16
VeraINSTITUTE

OF JUSTICE
Prop 36 will also worsen California's honielessness crisis.7 People who have spent time in jail or prison are 10 times niore likely to be honieless, and people who are unhoused are ll tiines niore likely to be arrested than people who have a stable home.8
Finally, Prop 36 would cost taxpayers an additional $5 billion dollars every year on top of the $27 billion already spent annually on jails, prisons, and court costs.9 These billions would take us further from addressing drug use and homelessness.

We urge the committee to vote "NO" to oppose this motion. Vera's experts and researchers would be glad to provide more information or answer questions—please feel free to contact me at mr>arris(S>vera.ore.

Sincerely,
M POAA^
Michelle Parris
Program Director
Vera California
1 Californians for Safety and Justice (CSJ), Mass Incarceration Ballot Initiative: A New Proposed Ballot Initiative Offers No Treatment, Only Punishment (Oakland, CA: CSJ, 2024), https://perma.cc/NLA9- 9PWS.
2 Vera Institute of Justice, Proposition 36 Risks Cutting Millions in Funding that Helps Thousands of Angelenos (Los Angeles: Vera, 2024), https://vera-advocacy-and- partnerships.s3.amazonaws.com/Vera%20CA_Los%2oAngeles%20Prop%2047%2oFunding%2oRese arch%2oBrief.pdf.
3 Patricia O'Driscoll and Albert Chen, Pasadena/Altadena "Vision 20/20" Reintegration Project, Board of State & Community Corrections (BSCC) Proposition 47 Grant Program, Two-Year Preliminary Evaluation Report, (Pasadena, CA: Public Works, Inc., 2019), https://www.bscc.ca.gov/wp- content/uuloads/Pasadena-Police-Deuartment.Ddf.
4 Whitney Harrison, Prop 47 Grant Program, Local Evaluation Plan, (Pasadena, CA: City of Pasadena Public Health Department, 2023), https://www.bscc.ca.goy/wp-content/uploads/Pasadena-Local- Evaluation-Plan.pdf^
s Keith Calayag, "Pasadena Health Director Sees Promising Results in City's Outreach Response Team Initiatives Addressing Homelessness," Pasadena NOW, September 2, 2023, httDs://Dasadenanow.com/main/Dasadena-health-director-sees-Dromising-results-in-cifrvrs-outreach- response-team-initiatives-addressing-homelessness; and Patricia O'Driscoll, Lisa Evans Powell, and Albert Chen, Pasadena/Altadena "Vision 20/20" Reintegration Project, California Board of State & Community Corrections (BSCC) Proposition 47 Grant Program Cohort l, Final Local Evaluation Report, September 30, 2021 (Pasadena, CA: Public Works, Inc., 2021), https://www.bscc.ca.gov/wp- content/uDloads/Pasadena-Police-DeDt-Cohort-i-fmal-reDort.Ddf. 6 Don Thompson, "California Prison Drug Overdoses Surge Again After Early Treatment Success," LAist, February 17, 2024, https://laist.com/news/health/califomia-prison-drug-overdoses-surge-again- after-earlv-treatment-success; and Ingrid A. Binswanger, Marc F. Stern, Richard A. Deyo, et al., "Release from Prison—A High Risk of Death for Former Inmates," New England Journal of Medicine 356, no. 2 (2007), l57-65> 161, https://perma.cc/L4QX-7MZ7. Researchers agree that people leaving incarceration have a significantly higher risk of overdose death, but estimates of likelihood differ by study.

A31* S SjN'ng Sbwt. <3QOA, tns A ngatus. Cft <?(m41213 4U 0168f.8M34u 0076wana.otg VeraINSTITUTE

OF JUSTICE
7 National Institute of Justice, "Five Things About Deterrence," June 5, 20l6, https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/five-things-about-deterrence. 8 Lucius Couloute, "Nowhere to Go: Homelessness among Formerly Incarcerated People," Prison Policy Initiative, August 2018, http://perma.cc/2JST-EEJC; and National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty (NHLC), Housing Not Handcuffs 2019: Ending the Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S.

Cities (Washington, DC: NHLC, 2019), https://perma.cc/NT7W-TDTH. 9 Californians for Safety and Justice (CSJ), Mass Incarceration Ballot Initiative: A New Proposed Ballot Initiative Offers No Treatment, Only Punishment (Oakland, CA: CSJ, 2024), httDS://r>erma.cc/NLAQ-QPWS
*31» S Spring StroBt, <300A, Los A ngstos, CA li>0014.tS3h»(M68f2t3 4)6 0076i-org

← All documents from this meeting