From: Denise Jones
To: Gao, Beilei
Cc: Hampton, Tyron; Cole, Rick; Jones, Justin; Lyon, Jason; Reyes, David Subject: June 24 MSC Meeting Agenda Items
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 2:15:28 PM
You don't often get email from Learn why this is important [ ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe.
Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DoIT portal.
------------------------
Dear MSC Members:
In my review of the agenda items for the Municipal Services Committee meeting scheduled for June 24 I have the following comments:
1. Regarding the Rate Study, while it appears to be preliminary, I believe it should include the impact of the adopted OSP which should guide costs projections. Because there is not an approved OSP, the rate study seems premature. Also it is not clear on
what assumptions are being made or what data is being
used. at the time of the submittal of the last IRP, it was also note that that submission was not a plan but a compliance document which led to the need for the OSP. The residents of Pasadena deserve an actual Optimized Strategic PLAN. This would should provie a guide PWP's path to 100% carbon free energy by 2030.
2. Regarding the OSP, the report presents as a summary or overview rather a plan. I believe the statement of work for the OSP comsultant was to prodice a plan and the agenda document does not meet the definition of a plan. Also, at a previous MSC meeting, the members voted to direct that the plan include 4 scenarios which focus on solar energy as an important means t to achieve the goal of 100% carbon free energy by 2030 and should be included in the plan.
Thank you for your vigilence in working for the benefit of Pasadena residents and for considering my comments.
Denise Jones
Resident - District One