From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Jonah Kanner
MSC Item 3: Speed Hump Policy
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 8:46:21 AM
You don't often get email frorLearn why this is imoortant [ ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Dear MSC members and staff,
Thank you for taking a look at the city's speed hump policy. The proposed amendments are important steps, and I hope you will approve them.
I am writing to ask for one additional amendment. Speed humps, and speed cushions in particular, are a simple and effective traffic calming technique. They should be a valuable tool for stowing traffic on the five Greenways in the city's bicycle transportation action plan (BTAP). However, my understanding is that staff (so far) have avoided proposing any speed humps on the planned Greenways, because this policy is far too restrictive for this case.
It seems very strange to me that we would effectively remove speed humps as a design option for slow, safe greenways. In other cities (such as Portland, OR and Palo Alto, CA) speed humps are a key design element for safe Greenways.
I support the proposed speed hump policy amendments. In addition, please add an amendment which would exempt Greenways in the city's bike plan from the speed hump policy, so that the Greenways design process can include speed humps as an option.
Thank you!
- Jonah Kanner
Gao, Beilei
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Blair Miller
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 11:10 AM
cityclerk; Cole, Rick; Jones, Justin; Lyon, Jason; hlampton, Tyron Siques, Joaquin; Reyes, David
MSC July 22, 2025 Agenda Item #3, Speed Hump Policy
You don't often get email fromLearn why this is important CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Councilmembers,
In September 2022, Anna Pollerana was killed on Marengo by a driver speeding down the wrong side of the street, as she was placing her grandchildren into a car. Her neighbor Colin Bogart (now on TAC) led the effort to install speed humps, which might have saved Anna's life had they been in place at the time. The difficulties that Colin faced in this effort showed clearly just how challenging it is to get speed humps installed under the current policy, even when more than 2/3 of the residents are in support.
I appreciate DOT'S effort to update the policy on speed humps and I aoree with all of their recommendations.
I am writing with a request, a note and a question.
I request that Councilmembers consider adding an exception to the policy for Greenways.
Speed humps or cushions are a simple and effective traffic calming technique. They should be a valuable tool for slowing traffic on the five Greenways in the city's bicycle transportation action plan (BTAP). Speed tables are also a good tool, but the entire point of the Greenways is to slow traffic down below 25MPH, so we should use the speed cushions on the slower Greenways and save speed tables for roads with higher traffic volumes.
Note: The City has moved to a new design ("speed cushions") which have cut-outs place so emergency vehicles can move more quickly over them. I support the continued use of this new design as the standard for all installations going forward.
Question: The cost for each speed hump is quoted at $4,000 to $5,000 per hump. Would the cost go down if more were installed each year?
Thank you,
Blair Miler
1 Gao, Beilei
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wesley Reutimann •
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 2:32 PM
cityclerk
Support for speed hump policy updates
You don't often get email fromLearn why this is i m portant ^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Dear
MSC members and DOT staff,
Thank
you for considering ways to approve the city's speed hump policy. The proposed amendments are important steps forward. The Reutimann household hopes you will approve them.
However
as you review the amendments, I ask that you add an additional one to ensure that speed humps and speed cushions are eligible, evidence based traffic calming tools that may be used on Pasadena's greenway corridors.
Thank you for your service,
Wesley Reutimann
1 Gao, Beilei
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Paul Little
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 3:34 PM
cityclerk
PublicComment-AutoResponse; Cole, Rick; Jones, Justin; Hampton, Tyron; Lyon, Jason; Siques, Joaquin; TravelAlaska.com Member Mailing
Municipal Services Committee speed hump discussion
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] . Learn why this is
CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Hello Municipal Services Committee members,
I read in PasadenaNOW that you were to take up consideration of changing the criteria for speed hump installation today, but online see that today's meeting is cancelled.
When you do take that issue into consideration, please take into account my concerns.
First, thank you for instituting the current anonymous voting system for seeking neighbor input on installing speed humps. It is fair and takes away much of the coercive nature of the previous petition system.
That said, the current system and the requirement for 2/3 of neighbors to approve the installation of speed humps is fair and should remain in place.
Installing speed humps on a residential street dramatically changes the character of a neighborhood. To do so in a manner that does not include the affirmation of a super-majority of the neighbors disenfranchises those neighbors who do not vote, for whatever reason and removes them from a decision-making process that could dramatically, and possibly without their knowledge, dramatically alter the character of their street.
Please maintain the current system to ensure no neighbors are disenfranchised in the process. Currently, neighbors are aware that a 2/3 positive vote is required. Those who do not vote are voting NO.
The assumption that those who do not vote are indifferent or do not care whether speed humps are installed is misguided. Whatever the reason for non-voting is irrelevant. They did not vote no, but hey also did not vote yes.
If you lower the requirement to approval by only 2/3 of those who vote, you are removing people from the process many who should have to agree to the installation of speed humps. And what of those who, for whatever reason do not get the notice in the mail, are away during the voting process, or disregard the mailed notice not knowing it is important? If, after the installation of the speed humps in a neighborhood, a significant number of neighbors say they were unaware of the vote, will you remove them?
Please maintain the current system to that everyone on the street has the chance to approve or deny such installations. 1 Gao, Beilei
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Kaly
Tuesday, July 22, 2025 3:22 PM
cityclerk
Speed humps
You don't often get email from '
<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification>
, Learn why this is important
^\] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Councilmembers,
In September 2022, Anna Pollerana was killed on Marengo by a driver speeding down the wrong side of the street, as she was placing her grandchildren into a car. Her neighbor Colin Bogart (now on TAC) led the effort to install speed humps, which might have saved Anna's life had they been in place at the time. The difficulties that Colin faced in this effort showed clearly just how challenging it is to get speed humps installed under the current policy, even when more than 2/3 of the residents are in support.
I appreciate DOT'S effort to update the policy on speed humps and I agree with all of their recommendations.
I am writing with a request to make one more important change, as well.
I request that Councilmembers consider adding an exception to the policy for Greenways. Speed humps or cushions are a simple and effective traffic calming technique. They should be a valuable tool for slowing traffic on the five Greenways in the city's bicycle transportation action plan (BTAP). Speed tables are also a good tool, but the entire point of the Greenways is to slow traffic down below 25MPH, so we should use the speed cushions on the slower Greenways and save speed tables for roads with higher traffic volumes.
Thank you,
KalyTrezos
1 Gao, Beilei
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jonah Kanner
Monday, August 25, 2025 7:42 PM
cityclerk
Gao, Beilei
MSC Item 2: Speed hlump Policy
^] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you frnowthe content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Dear Municipal Service Committee members and staff,
Thank you for taking a look at the city's speed hump policy. The proposed amendments are important steps, and I hope you will approve them.
I am writing to ask for one additional amendment. Speed humps, and speed cushions in particular, could be a valuable tool for slowing traffic on the five Greenways in the city's bicycle transportation action plan (BTAP). However, the current policy makes this nearly impossible.
It seems very strange to me that we would effectively remove speed humps as a design option for slow, safe greenways. In other cities (such as Portland, OR and Palo Alto, CA) speed humps are a key design element for safe Greenways.
I support the proposed speed hump policy amendments. In addition, please add an amendment which would exempt Greenways in the city's bike plan from the speed hump policy, so that the Greenways design process can include speed humps as an option.
Thank you!
-Jonah Kanner
1