Cities Index.
2025-10-21 - Meeting Correspondence Item 1

Economic Development & Technology Committee
October 21, 2025

Document
2025-10-21 - Meeting Correspondence Item 1
Meeting
October 21, 2025
Body
Economic Development & Technology Committee
Original file
601 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityofpasadena.net. That file is the official record.

Gao, Beilei
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Donna Sider
Tuesday, October 21, 2025 3:37 PM
Gao, Beilei; Bert Newton; Anthony Manousos; Jill Shook
Ed Tech submission 10-21-25
Vacancy Tax 10-21-25.0dt
You don't often get email fromLearn why this is important {t\} CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.

Hello,
Kindly find written comments attached which I have filled out a speaker card to present.

Thank you,
Donna Sider
for Justice Commission, Pasadena Mennonite Church
1 We disagree with the consultant recommendation to continue the existing inclusionary housing ceiling at 20%. In the years since this was re-visited, housing has become out-of-reach for most. As a city, we can model strengthening inclusionary housing for those costed out. I, too, urge this commission to accept the research findings that 25% is well-within feasible! Vacancy tax is a mechanism in the Housing Element. We have joined this commission in studying how this can aid our affordability crisis. It saddens me to go to the Paseo Mali and see so many empty storefronts. I'd love to see locally owned start-up businesses in this central corridor which looks up to Centennial Square. One reason we see many vacant commercial properties in Pasadena is that commercial owners are leasing at a rate that is too high to make their buildings attractive for local businesses.

Another reason many commercial properties are vacant is that under Prop 13, property taxes are so low they can afford to keep their buildings empty. This is especially true for those who have held onto properties for decades. Prop 13 has disproportionately benefited commercial property owners especially those who have held onto their property for long periods of time.

The State's Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that this commercial property loophole costs California between $8 billion and $12 billion per year in lost revenue. It therefore makes sense to charge commercial property owners a vacancy tax to incentivize them to lower their rent and attract new businesses revitalizing these areas of the city. Oakland has modeled charging business owners, who are unwilling to lower rents, a percentage which is added to an affordable housing fund.

← All documents from this meeting