McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 1:38 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Ensure Safe and Contextual Development in Pasadena - 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Ensure Safe and Contextual Development in Pasadena - 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
We are residents who love our neighborhoods and care deeply about the future of our city. We support innovation and institutions like Caltech, but we also believe that progress should never come at the expense of the health and safety of our children, our families, and our community. Many of us live, worship, and send our children to school near the proposed R&D project site at 1364 E. Green St. We are deeply concerned that this project has been approved without clearly demonstrating that it can operate safely next to a school, a church, and homes. For those of us who live here every day, these are not abstract planning issues — they are real worries about air quality, traffic, noise, and the long-term well- being of the people we love. We respectfully ask the City Council to pause and reconsider. Reversing the Design Committee's approval and requiring a full environmental analysis would show residents that our voices matter and that decisions affecting our health and safety are being made carefully and transparently. Our community is not opposed to compromise. We have indicated support for a reduced project of 51 feet in height, if and only if a thorough environmental review demonstrates that it can coexist safely with surrounding homes, a school, and a place of worship. This is a reasonable request grounded in care for our neighborhood, not opposition to progress. We are also asking the Council to look more closely at the broader policy changes made in November 2023 that opened residential- adjacent streets to tall R&D facilities. These changes have left many residents feeling blindsided and unheard. Concentrating taller R&D buildings along established commercial corridors like Fair Oaks, Colorado, and Lake would allow innovation to thrive without placing disproportionate burdens on residential streets such as Green. Finally, we believe the process that led to these sweeping code changes failed to fully consider how they could affect nearby families, students, and seniors. Decisions of this magnitude should not leave residents feeling anxious about new health, traffic, and safety risks in places that were once considered stable and protected. We urge you to act now — to slow down, listen to residents, and ensure that development in our city reflects both innovation and compassion. Please help us protect the character, safety, and livability of the neighborhoods we call home. Thank you for hearing us.
Sincerely,
Irene Ponce-Gamboa
Monterey Park, CA 91754 Constituent
McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 6:18 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Respect Community Input for 1364 E Green St
[A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Respect Community Input for 1364 E Green St
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Please do not allow the 1364 E. Green Street project to proceed in its current form, and grant the appeal.
I support development, innovation, and Pasadena's role as a center for research and life sciences. At the same time, the East Colorado Specific Plan was developed through extensive public engagement, with hundreds of residents participating in person and thousands more providing input online. That process was intended to meaningfully guide where and how growth should occur. This project moved forward without a full environmental review and at a scale that exceeds what was envisioned for this location.
Setting aside the ECSP's guidance here, especially for a project next to a school, a church, and homes, risks undermining the community vision that informed the plan. Approving the project in its current form would set a precedent for enhanced R&D development in locations not clearly intended under adopted plans. Granting the appeal would allow the City to honor its planning process while refining the project to better align with community expectations.
Sincerely,
Eleanor Richardson
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 1:15 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a longtime Catholic parishioner who attends Mass regularly and cares deeply about our church and its future. For many of us, this parish is the center of our spiritual lives. It is where I come each week to pray, find peace, and feel close to God. Our church, designed by Roland Coate, is a beautiful and historic place, and the quiet and reverence of the space mean so much to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I support Pasadena's growth and understand the importance of innovation, but I worry that the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street would make it very difficult for parishioners like me. Construction often begins as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, heavy trucks, and ground vibration could easily disrupt daily and weekend Masses, funerals, weddings, and times of prayer. Many parishioners are older and move more slowly, and increased traffic and noise would make attending Mass more stressful and less safe. I am also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building, which was never meant to sit next to a large-scale project like this. Catholic teaching reminds us to care for one another and work for the common good (Gaudium et Spes). I do not feel that approving this project without a full environmental review reflects that care. I respectfully ask the City Council to require that this project follow the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan and undergo a thorough environmental review that truly considers noise, vibration, and construction hours. Please allow this project to return in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who depend on it. Thank you for listening to my concerns and for protecting the communities that make Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Chris Tolle
South Pasadena, CA 91030 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 1:18 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Please Restore Confidence in Pasadena's Planning Process - 1364 E. Green St. [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Please Restore Confidence in Pasadena's Planning Process - 1364 E. Green St.
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a longtime Pasadena resident who cares deeply about our city and its future. I understand that growth is inevitable and that innovation and housing are important. However, I am increasingly concerned about the scale and density of recent developments and what they mean for our community's character. Many of the new buildings being approved seem simply too large for the neighborhoods where they are being placed. They overwhelm surrounding homes, change the scale of our streets, and leave residents wondering whether long-standing planning principles still guide decision-making. When projects appear out of proportion to their surroundings, it erodes public trust. Pasadena has long been known for thoughtful planning, human-scale neighborhoods, and careful transitions between commercial and residential areas. That tradition is one of the reasons many of us chose to live here.
When dense, oversized developments are approved without clear justification or meaningful responsiveness to community concerns, it creates the perception that established standards are being set aside. This is not about opposing growth outright. It is about ensuring that growth is balanced, contextual, and consistent with our city's character. Development should enhance neighborhoods — not overshadow them. I respectfully urge the City Council to take steps to restore public confidence in the planning process. That means ensuring transparency, carefully evaluating scale and compatibility, and demonstrating that community input genuinely influences outcomes. Residents need to feel that planning decisions are guided by clear principles, not simply by what can be maximized on a parcel.
Pasadena's strength has always been its ability to evolve while preserving what makes it special. I hope you will reaffirm that commitment and ensure that future development reflects the values and scale that define our city. Thank you for your time and service.
Sincerely,
donelle woolsey
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 1:18 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Responsible Growth: Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street Proposal [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Responsible Growth: Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street Proposal Mr. Mark Jomsky,
We are residents who support thoughtful development, innovation, and the important role institutions like Caltech play in our city. At the same time, we believe development must be safe, transparent, and compatible with the neighborhoods in which it is proposed. We are concerned that the current R&D project has not been adequately shown to be safe given its location next to a school, a church, and established residential neighborhoods. In particular, we believe the environmental review has not sufficiently addressed potential health, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts on these sensitive uses. We respectfully ask the City Council to reverse the Design Committee's approval and require a proper and comprehensive environmental analysis before this project proceeds. This step is essential to ensuring that decisions are based on sound information and that community impacts are fully understood. We also want to note that reasonable compromises are possible. Community representatives have indicated a willingness to support a project limited to 51 feet in height, provided it is accompanied by a satisfactory environmental review that demonstrates it can operate safely in this location. More broadly, we urge the Council to revisit its November 2023 modification of the General Plan that allowed R&D facilities citywide. We believe that R&D facilities with increased height allowances should be concentrated along established commercial corridors such as Fair Oaks, Colorado, and Lake, rather than on streets directly adjacent to residential neighborhoods, including Green Street. Finally, we are concerned that recent broad amendments to the R&D code were adopted without sufficient consideration of how they could impact nearby schools, churches, and homes. These changes risk introducing health, traffic, and other hazards into areas that were previously protected by zoning and planning standards. We ask the Council to take action to ensure responsible development, protect neighborhood livability, and restore public confidence in the planning process. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
beth filipponi
om
pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 3:09 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Questioning City Priorities Regarding Development Next to St. Philip the Apostle School [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Questioning City Priorities Regarding Development Next to St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Why is the City advancing a major construction and R&D project directly next to an active elementary school and church, and whose interests are being prioritized in allowing it to proceed this far? I am a parent of a child at St. Philip the Apostle School, writing out of deep concern regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street. Placing prolonged construction, increased traffic, and an R&D facility with unclear research uses immediately adjacent to children raises serious questions about judgment, oversight, and public responsibility. Parents expect the City to exercise heightened caution when decisions affect schools and residential neighborhoods. Instead, this project appears to have moved forward with limited transparency and without clear, publicly demonstrated assurances that children's safety and daily well-being come first. It is reasonable to ask why this location was considered acceptable at all, and why safeguards were not firmly established before progress was made. I respect the role of the City Council and acknowledge Caltech's contributions to Pasadena. However, economic or institutional interests should never outweigh the obligation to protect children. I urge the Council to pause this project, require a comprehensive safety and environmental review, and seriously reconsider whether this site is appropriate for high-intensity development. The community is watching closely and expects decisions rooted in accountability, sound judgment, and a clear commitment to families—not expediency.
Sincerely,
Donna Prieto-Valenzuela
._-
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 3:16 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Prayerful Request for Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Prayerful Request for Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am an aunt to my 3 nesphews that attend St. Philip the Apostle School, and I am writing with a humble and prayerful request regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, near our school, church, and neighborhood. As a family member and my husband and I also support our 3 nephews with all of thr school fundraisers, including but not limited to the recent jog-a-thon. We entrust our nephews to God's care and to the community around them each day, hoping they are learning in a safe and nurturing environment. For this reason, we are concerned about the potential impacts of construction activity near the school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the presence of an R&D facility whose research uses have not been clearly explained. My husband is a union carpenter project superintendent and shared concerns. These uncertainties are especially difficult when children's safety is involved. I am grateful for your service to the City and respectful of Caltech's role in Pasadena. At the same time, schools and churches are sacred spaces that deserve special care. Decisions affecting them should be approached with patience, transparency, and a commitment to protecting the most vulnerable. I respectfully ask the City Council to pause and prayerfully discern whether this project, as proposed, serves the common good. A thorough safety and environmental review, respect for existing height and zoning limits, and thoughtful placement of high-intensity R&D uses would help bring families greater peace of mind.
Sincerely,
Erin Koger
Metamora, IL 61548 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 3:32 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Immediate Action Required: Child Safety Risks at 1364 E. Green Street [ 4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Immediate Action Required: Child Safety Risks at 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent of a child at St. Philip the Apostle School, located immediately adjacent to the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street. I am writing to state plainly that this project, as proposed, places children at risk and should not be allowed to proceed in its current form. This proposal would introduce large-scale construction, increased traffic on a narrow neighborhood street, and an R&D building with undefined research activities, all directly next to a school and a church. As a parent, I find it unacceptable that children could be exposed to construction hazards, unsafe traffic conditions, and unknown operational risks without a completed and credible environmental and safety analysis. Projects next to schools require a higher standard of care. That standard has not been met here. The lack of clarity about the nature of the research, combined with the project's scale and its location on a neighborhood street, represents a failure to adequately protect sensitive uses—especially children. I support responsible development and Caltech's presence in Pasadena. However, I do not support placing experimental or high-intensity R&D uses next to a school without clear limits, transparency, and proven safety. I am asking the City Council to stop this project, require a full and meaningful safety and environmental review, enforce existing height and zoning limits, and ensure R&D facilities are confined to appropriate commercial and industrial corridors—not residential streets with schools. This is not an abstract planning issue. It is a real and immediate safety concern for children. I urge you to act accordingly.
Sincerely,
Fernando Valer
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 3:33 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parent Concerns About Child Safety Near 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parent Concerns About Child Safety Near 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent of a child at St. Philip the Apostle School, located very close to the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street. I am writing with sincere concern about how this project, as currently proposed, could affect the safety and daily environment of our children, school, and neighborhood. As a parent, I am especially worried about the impacts of extended construction activity next to a school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the introduction of an R&D building with research uses that have not been clearly defined. These factors raise real questions about safety that, in my view, have not yet been fully or reassuringly addressed. I want to be clear that I support responsible development and appreciate Caltech's important role in Pasadena. At the same time, projects located next to schools and churches should be held to a higher standard of care. When children are involved, it is essential that potential health, traffic, and operational risks are thoroughly evaluated and clearly communicated before any project moves forward. I respectfully ask the City Council to take a cautious approach by requiring a comprehensive environmental and safety review, upholding existing height and zoning limits, and ensuring that high-intensity R&D uses are located in appropriate commercial or industrial areas rather than on neighborhood streets adjacent to schools. My hope is simply that the City will pause, take a closer look, and place the safety of children and families at the center of its decision-making. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
diana Valer
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 4:40 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Grant the Appeal - R&D Project at 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Grant the Appeal - R&D Project at 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Why was a high-intensity R&D project allowed to advance directly adjacent to an active school without full environmental review, clear disclosure of research uses, or a design consistent with the City's own planning policies? I am a grandmother of three grandsons at the school.l am writing regarding the proposed R&D project at 1364 E. Green Street. I support Pasadena's goal of attracting life-sciences employers and retaining Caltech-connected innovation. However, development next to a school demands a higher standard of care, transparency, and scale than this project has demonstrated.l am registered nurse and have many concerns over the exposure and of the students to all chemicals, dust and noise. You are very selfish and have thought about these children. This project proceeded without a comprehensive environmental review, despite its proximity to children and daily school operations. The East Colorado Specific Plan envisions a transition at this location, with a maximum height of approximately 51 feet. A smaller, neighborhood-scaled redesign consistent with that plan—combined with full environmental review—would allow traffic, safety, and operational impacts to be evaluated before construction, not after. Approving the project as proposed would set a concerning precedent by enabling intensified R&D near schools in areas not clearly intended for such development under the General Plan or the East Colorado Specific Plan. That path invites future appeals, disputes, and continued erosion of public trust in the City's planning process. I respectfully urge the City Council to grant the appeal and require that this project be returned in a form that supports economic growth without compromising children's safety or established planning standards. Thank you for your consideration and your responsibility to the families and educators who rely on careful, accountable decision-making.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Smith
-
Bloomington, IL 61704 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 4:56 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Respect Our Sacred Space- St. Philip the Apostle [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Respect Our Sacred Space-St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of the historic church on Green Street. For many of us, this parish is a second home — a place of prayer, peace, and community. It is also a treasured Roland Coate landmark that has been part of Pasadena's character for generations. I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street. Early-morning construction, heavy trucks, and vibration would disrupt Mass, funerals, and weddings, and could impact our historic church building. A project of this scale does not belong immediately beside a sacred space and an established neighborhood. This is not opposition to growth. It is a call for balance and respect. I urge the Council to require a full environmental review and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect our church, our neighborhood, and the character that makes Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Cecilia Samartin
Glendale, CA 91207 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 5:32 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: 1364 E. Green Street
[1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner, neighbor, and former school parent who cares deeply about our community and Pasadena. I support Pasadena's plans for new development. However, I have major concerns about the size of the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street. I'm writing to request that the City Council take more time, require a proper environmental review, ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan, and require landscaping that adds beauty to the site. Please adjust this project so that it does not have a negative impact on our church, the school, and our neighborhood. Thank you, Mary E. Mansell 1545 Oakdale Street Pasadena 91106 Sincerely,
Mary Mansell
- Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 5:59 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect What Anchors Our Community-St. Philip the Apostle Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a St. Philip the Apostle parishioner who believes we must protect the places that anchor our community. Our churches, schools, and long-established neighborhoods are not just structures on a map — they are the foundations of daily life in Pasadena. They provide stability, belonging, and continuity across generations. When large-scale development such as that at 1364 E. Green Street is proposed immediately beside these anchors, it raises serious concerns. Sacred spaces and neighborhood institutions depend on peace, safety, and compatibility with their surroundings. Construction impacts, increased traffic, noise, and projects that are out of scale can disrupt more than routines — they can erode the sense of place that holds a community together. Pasadena has long been admired for thoughtful planning that balances growth with preservation. That balance is essential. Growth should strengthen the institutions that define us, not overshadow or strain them. I respectfully urge you to ensure that projects near churches, schools, and established neighborhoods undergo thorough review and are appropriately scaled to their settings. Protecting what anchors our community is not opposition to progress — it is a commitment to responsible stewardship. Please safeguard the places that give Pasadena its identity and heart.
Sincerely,
Verlana Cadorna
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 6:09 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: 1364 E. Green Street Opposition - Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: 1364 E. Green Street Opposition - Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred and historic place of worship, designed by renowned architect Roland Coate, whose work is an important part of Pasadena's architectural heritage. This church is not only a place of prayer and sacrament, but a cultural and spiritual landmark that serves generations of families. Catholic Social Teaching calls us to uphold the common good and protect human dignity (Gaudium et Spes), values that depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, respectful, and peaceful. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions such as Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Construction associated with a project of this intensity-often beginning as early as 7:00 a.m. and continuing for many hours each day—raises serious concerns for our parish. Noise, heavy equipment, truck traffic, and ground vibration threaten to disrupt Masses, funerals, weddings, religious education, and times of prayer and reflection. Vibration is of particular concern given the church's historic design and materials. Prolonged construction activity could place stress on a structure never intended to be adjacent to large-scale R&D development, risking both physical damage and the loss of the quiet reverence essential to worship. Approving the project without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, places an unfair burden on a historic church and its parishioners. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review that fully addresses construction noise, vibration, and hours of operation. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects stewardship, protects our historic parish, and respects the sacred nature of worship.
Sincerely,
Anna Sarah Nunez
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 6:57 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place where we gather for worship, receive the sacraments, and serve others. These ministries depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of sensitive uses. As Catholics, we are called to uphold human dignity, care for our neighbors, and act as good stewards of our community. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions like Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this street, raises real concerns for parishioners—especially families, children, and elderly members of our community. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Doing so would better reflect both Pasadena's planning goals and respect for faith communities. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors stewardship, safety, and the vital role our church plays in the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Catherine Del Russo
:. Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 8:09 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship /1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship /1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred and historic place of worship, designed by renowned architect Roland Coate, whose work is an important part of Pasadena's architectural heritage. This church is not only a place of prayer and sacrament, but a cultural and spiritual landmark that serves generations of families. Catholic Social Teaching calls us to uphold the common good and protect human dignity (Gaudium et Spes), values that depend on a safe and respectful surrounding environment. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions such as Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Construction activity of this intensity raises serious concerns about noise, vibration, traffic, and access, including the potential for Masses, funerals, weddings, and other worship services to be disrupted. Approving the project without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, places an unfair burden on a historic church and its parishioners. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects stewardship, protects our historic parish, and respects the sacred nature of worship.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Torres
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 10:06 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner who comes to Mass every week and cares deeply about our church.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It's where I come to pray, to find some quiet, and to feel at peace. Our church is also a beautiful and historic building designed by Roland Coate, and it means a great deal to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I understand that Pasadena wants to grow and support new development, and I respect that. But I'm very worried about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for people like me. Construction often starts as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, trucks, and ground shaking would make it hard to attend Mass, especially for older parishioners. It's difficult to pray when there's loud construction outside, and I worry about Masses, funerals, and weddings being interrupted. I'm also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building. It was never meant to be next to a large project like this. As Catholics, we're taught to look out for one another and to do what's best for the common good. I don't feel that approving this project without a full environmental review does that. I'm simply asking the City Council to slow this down, require a proper environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please let this project come back in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who come here every week. Thank you for taking the time to listen to a parishioner who just wants to keep my cherished church peaceful and the spiritual place it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
Chindia Tan
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2026 10:07 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Cres Melendez
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 8:08 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place where we gather for worship, receive the sacraments, and serve others. These ministries depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of sensitive uses. As Catholics, we are called to uphold human dignity, care for our neighbors, and act as good stewards of our community. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions like Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this street, raises real concerns for parishioners-especially families, children, and elderly members of our community. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Doing so would better reflect both Pasadena's planning goals and respect for faith communities. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors stewardship, safety, and the vital role our church plays in the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Ricardo Marquez
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 8:33 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Teacher Safety Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Teacher Safety Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a teacher at and alumna of St. Philip the Apostle School, located near the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, and I am writing to express serious concerns about this project's proximity to a school, church, and residential neighborhood. I am particularly worried about construction activity next to our children, increased and unsafe traffic on Green Street, and the placement of an R&D building with unknown research uses adjacent to a school. At this time, it has not been clearly demonstrated that this project would be safe or appropriate for such a sensitive location. I support responsible development and Caltech's contributions to Pasadena, but projects near schools must meet the highest standards for safety, scale, and transparency. I respectfully ask the City Council to require a stronger environmental and safety review, uphold existing height limits, and ensure R&D uses are located in appropriate commercial or industrial corridors—not on neighborhood streets next to schools. Please put the safety of children and families first and reconsider allowing this project to proceed in its current form.
Sincerely,
Mary Rose Hawkins
AAAAAA
South Pasadena, CA 91030 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 8:47 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parent's Request for Care and Caution Near St. Philip the Apostle School [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: A Parent's Request for Care and Caution Near St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent at St. Philip the Apostle School, and I am writing with a sincere and heartfelt request for care and caution regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, which is so close to our school, church, and neighborhood. As parents, we entrust our children to the care of their teachers and community each day, hoping they are surrounded by a safe and nurturing environment. For this reason, I am worried about the potential impacts of construction activity next to a school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the introduction of an R&D facility with research uses that have not been clearly explained. These uncertainties weigh heavily when the safety and well-being of children are involved. I want to express my respect for the City's work and for Caltech's important role in Pasadena. At the same time, Catholic schools and parishes are places of learning, worship, and refuge. Developments near them should be approached with special care, humility, and transparency, particularly when potential health or safety concerns remain unanswered. I respectfully ask the City Council to pause and carefully discern whether this project, as proposed, truly serves the common good of this neighborhood. A thorough environmental and safety review, adherence to existing height and zoning limits, and thoughtful placement of R&D uses in appropriate commercial or industrial areas would help provide families with greater peace of mind. My hope is that the City will choose a path that reflects stewardship, protects our children, and honors the character of this faith-centered community. Thank you for your time, attention, and service to Pasadena.
Sincerely,
Mark Kane
- -
San Gabriel, CA 91775 Constituent
--~
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 9:01 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of a historic church on Hill Avenue.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It is where we gather for Mass, funerals, weddings, and quiet prayer. It is a place of peace — and a beautiful historic building designed by Roland Coate that has stood as part of Pasadena's character for generations. I understand that Pasadena must grow. But | am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it would mean for our church and the surrounding neighborhood. Early-morning construction, heavy truck traffic, and ground vibration would disrupt worship and could damage our historic structure. It is hard to pray amid noise and shaking. Our church was never meant to sit beside a project of this scale. More broadly, many residents feel that recent developments are simply too large and out of proportion to their surroundings.
When projects appear driven by maximum height and density rather than compatibility and care, public confidence in the planning process erodes. This is not opposition to growth. It is a plea for balance and respect — for our neighborhoods, our historic buildings, and the sacred spaces that anchor our community. I respectfully ask the Council to slow this process, require a full environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect what makes Pasadena special and restore trust that our planning decisions reflect this community's values.
Sincerely,
Magdalena Moeller
•San gabriel, CA 91775 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 9:29 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Thank you so much for reading this letter. Your service to our Pasadena community is so appreciated by many. I work on Green Street and two of our banks that we deal with are on Green Street. It is street between Lake and Hill that I know very well. Our four children all went to St. Philip the Apostle School and as a parishioner, I am fearful about the proposed Trammell Crow development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community, school and neighborhood. I support Pasadena's commitment to property rights, innovation, economic growth, and research and development. At the same time, churches play a vital role in our city as places of worship, reflection, education, and service.
These missions depend on safe and appropriately scaled surroundings that respect sensitive uses and neighborhood character. In terms of scale, this building is way too big for this small neighborhood and really out of place. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location.
It frankly is an orphan given its sheer size. Proceeding without a full environmental review-and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street-raises serious concerns for parishioners, including traffic safety, air quality, and overall compatibility. Requiring the project to return in a redesigned form that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's maximum height of approximately 51 feet and that undergoes a thorough environmental analysis would better align the development with the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive institutions. This approach would help preserve community trust while still supporting Pasadena's broader innovation goals. Approving the Trammell Crow project as proposed would set a troubling precedent for placing intensified R&D uses adjacent to churches and schools. It is not good community planning and great master planning is what had made Pasadena beautiful. I respectfully ask you to grant the appeal and allow this project to move forward only in a form that reflects both economic ambition and respect for our church and school community and shared values. Thank you for reading the letter time and for all your hard work.
Sincerely,
Edward Roohan
Altadena, CA 91001 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 10:11 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a longtime Catholic parishioner who attends Mass regularly and cares deeply about our church and its future. For many of us, this parish is the center of our spiritual lives. It is where I come each week to pray, find peace, and feel close to God. Our church, designed by Roland Coate, is a beautiful and historic place, and the quiet and reverence of the space mean so much to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I support Pasadena's growth and understand the importance of innovation, but I worry that the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street would make it very difficult for parishioners like me. Construction often begins as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, heavy trucks, and ground vibration could easily disrupt daily and weekend Masses, funerals, weddings, and times of prayer. Many parishioners are older and move more slowly, and increased traffic and noise would make attending Mass more stressful and less safe. I am also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building, which was never meant to sit next to a large-scale project like this. Catholic teaching reminds us to care for one another and work for the common good (Gaudium et Spes). I do not feel that approving this project without a full environmental review reflects that care. I respectfully ask the City Council to require that this project follow the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan and undergo a thorough environmental review that truly considers noise, vibration, and construction hours. Please allow this project to return in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who depend on it. Thank you for listening to my concerns and for protecting the communities that make Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Maureen Miller
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 10:11 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect What Anchors Our Community-St. Philip the Apostle Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a St. Philip the Apostle parishioner who believes we must protect the places that anchor our community. Our churches, schools, and long-established neighborhoods are not just structures on a map — they are the foundations of daily life in Pasadena. They provide stability, belonging, and continuity across generations. When large-scale development such as that at 1364 E. Green Street is proposed immediately beside these anchors, it raises serious concerns. Sacred spaces and neighborhood institutions depend on peace, safety, and compatibility with their surroundings. Construction impacts, increased traffic, noise, and projects that are out of scale can disrupt more than routines - they can erode the sense of place that holds a community together. Pasadena has long been admired for thoughtful planning that balances growth with preservation. That balance is essential. Growth should strengthen the institutions that define us, not overshadow or strain them. I respectfully urge you to ensure that projects near churches, schools, and established neighborhoods undergo thorough review and are appropriately scaled to their settings. Protecting what anchors our community is not opposition to progress — it is a commitment to responsible stewardship. Please safeguard the places that give Pasadena its identity and heart.
Sincerely,
Julia Mariah Vargas
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 10:12 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation, economic growth, and research and development. At the same time, churches play a vital role in our city as places of worship, reflection, education, and service. These missions depend on safe, accessible, and appropriately scaled surroundings that respect sensitive uses and neighborhood character. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the currently proposed scale. Proceeding without a full environmental review-and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street—raises serious concerns for parishioners, including traffic safety, noise, air quality, and overall compatibility with church activities. Requiring the project to return in a redesigned form that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's maximum height of approximately 51 feet and that undergoes a thorough environmental analysis would better align the development with the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive institutions. This approach would help preserve community trust while still supporting Pasadena's broader innovation goals. Approving the project as proposed would set a troubling precedent for placing intensified R&D uses adjacent to churches and other sensitive community institutions in areas not clearly intended for such development under Pasadena's planning framework. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to move forward only in a form that reflects both economic ambition and respect for our church community and shared values.
Sincerely,
Ann Kennedy
: Altadena, CA 91001 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 10:13 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of a historic church on Hill Avenue - St. Philip. For many of us, this parish is a second home. It is where we gather for Mass, funerals, weddings, and quiet prayer. It is a place of peace — and a beautiful historic building designed by Roland Coate that has stood as part of Pasadena's character for generations. I understand that Pasadena must grow. But I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it would mean for our church and the surrounding neighborhood. Early-morning construction, heavy truck traffic, and ground vibration would disrupt worship and could damage our historic structure. It is hard to pray amid noise and shaking. Our church was never meant to sit beside a project of this scale. More broadly, many residents feel that recent developments are simply too large and out of proportion to their surroundings. When projects appear driven by maximum height and density rather than compatibility and care, public confidence in the planning process erodes. This is not opposition to growth. It is a plea for balance and respect — for our neighborhoods, our historic buildings, and the sacred spaces that anchor our community. I respectfully ask the Council to slow this process, require a full environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan.
Please protect what makes Pasadena special and restore trust that our planning decisions reflect this community's values. This will create an increase in traffic and a potential safety risk for our children and school. There is plenty of land for Cal Tech to build elsewhere. Please end this encroachment of our community.
Sincerely,
Spence Miller
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 10:25 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle [ I] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a St. Philip the Apostle parishioner who believes we must protect the places that anchor our community. Our churches, schools, and long-established neighborhoods are not just structures on a map - they are the foundations of daily life in Pasadena. They provide stability, belonging, and continuity across generations. When large-scale development such as that at 1364 E. Green Street is proposed immediately beside these anchors, it raises serious concerns. Sacred spaces and neighborhood institutions depend on peace, safety, and compatibility with their surroundings. Construction impacts, increased traffic, noise, and projects that are out of scale can disrupt more than routines - they can erode the sense of place that holds a community together. Pasadena has long been admired for thoughtful planning that balances growth with preservation. That balance is essential. Growth should strengthen the institutions that define us, not overshadow or strain them. I respectfully urge you to ensure that projects near churches, schools, and established neighborhoods undergo thorough review and are appropriately scaled to their settings. Protecting what anchors our community is not opposition to progress — it is a commitment to responsible stewardship. Please safeguard the places that give Pasadena its identity and heart.
Sincerely,
James Mosa
- Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 11:10 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Respect Our Sacred Space- St. Philip the Apostle [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Respect Our Sacred Space- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of the historic church on Green Street. For many of us, this parish is a second home — a place of prayer, peace, and community. It is also a treasured Roland Coate landmark that has been part of Pasadena's character for generations. I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street. Early-morning construction, heavy trucks, and vibration would disrupt Mass, funerals, and weddings, and could impact our historic church building. A project of this scale does not belong immediately beside a sacred space and an established neighborhood. This is not opposition to growth. It is a call for balance and respect. I urge the Council to require a full environmental review and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect our church, our neighborhood, and the character that makes Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Ray Bustos
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 11:20 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I write as a Catholic parishioner with deep concern for the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place. It is where we gather to worship God, receive the sacraments, educate our children in faith, care for the poor, and offer refuge to those seeking peace and healing. The Church's mission depends not only on what happens inside our walls, but also on the surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of this sacred purpose. The Catholic tradition teaches us to value human dignity, stewardship of creation, and care for the most vulnerable among us. For these reasons, I am troubled that this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale currently proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, risks disrupting the life of our parish and undermining the sense of safety and reverence that parishioners depend upon.
Traffic congestion, noise, air quality, and safety concerns are not theoretical. They affect families arriving for Mass, children attending religious education, elderly parishioners with limited mobility, and those who come to our church seeking prayer, counseling, or quiet refuge. A redesigned project that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes a thorough environmental review would better reflect the values of care, balance, and responsibility that Pasadena claims to uphold. Approving this project as proposed would set a troubling precedent-suggesting that churches and other sensitive institutions may be asked to bear the burdens of growth without adequate protection or consideration. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors both economic progress and the spiritual and communal life of our city. Pasadena can grow in a way that respects faith communities, protects human dignity, and reflects true stewardship. I ask that you choose that path.
Sincerely,
Efren Rodriguez
PASADENA, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 12:07 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
Irene Borromeo
• - Pasadena, CA 91104-4606 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 12:08 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces - St. Philip the Apostle [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who believes that sacred spaces deserve special care and protection.
Churches are not simply buildings — they are places of worship, reflection, community, and comfort during life's most important moments. They are where families gather for baptisms, weddings, funerals, and weekly prayer. They are anchors of stability in our neighborhoods. I am concerned about development proposals, such as the 1364 E. Green Street project, that place large, high-intensity projects directly beside active houses of worship. Construction noise, heavy truck traffic, vibration, and long-term operational impacts can disrupt services and diminish the peaceful environment these spaces require. Sacred spaces should not be treated like ordinary parcels of land. Growth is important, but it must be balanced with respect for community institutions. Pasadena has long taken pride in thoughtful planning that protects historic buildings and sensitive uses. That tradition should continue by ensuring projects adjacent to churches undergo the highest level of environmental scrutiny and are scaled appropriately to their surroundings. Safeguarding sacred spaces is not about resisting progress — it is about preserving the spiritual and cultural foundations that hold our community together. I respectfully urge the Council to prioritize the protection of our churches and ensure that development decisions reflect the care these institutions deserve.
Sincerely,
Shannon Atherton
--
Duarte, CA 91010 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 12:22 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message—that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Angelica Arteaga
~ Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 1:11 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street Development [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street Development
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I support innovation and development in Pasadena, but projects must respect our neighborhoods, schools, and churches. The proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street does not meet these standards. While I support Caltech and its contributions, this project has not demonstrated that it is safe or compatible with our community vision. I urge the Council to require: Compliance with height limits:
Maximum 51 feet as outlined in the Specific Plan. Full environmental review: To ensure operations do not endanger residents or sensitive uses. Responsible land use: R&D projects should be limited to commercial and industrial corridors, such as Fair Oaks, Raymond, Arroyo Parkway, Lake Avenue, and Colorado Blvd—not to minor streets such as Holliston, Catalina, and Green. Recent broad code amendments have allowed developments that create traffic, health, and safety risks for neighbors.
Pasadena deserves growth that is safe, contextual, and enhances the community. The 1364 E. Green Street project should proceed only if it aligns with these principles. I urge the Council to protect Pasadena's neighborhoods and ensure responsible, community-focused development.
Sincerely,
Melanie & Antonio Moniz
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 1:34 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street |[1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is sate. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a longtime Catholic parishioner who attends Mass regularly and cares deeply about our church and its future. For many of us, this parish is the center of our spiritual lives. It is where I come each week to pray, find peace, and feel close to God. Our church, designed by Roland Coate, is a beautiful and historic place, and the quiet and reverence of the space mean so much to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I support Pasadena's growth and understand the importance of innovation, but I worry that the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street would make it very difficult for parishioners like me. Construction often begins as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, heavy trucks, and ground vibration could easily disrupt daily and weekend Masses, funerals, weddings, and times of prayer. Many parishioners are older and move more slowly, and increased traffic and noise would make attending Mass more stressful and less safe. I am also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building, which was never meant to sit next to a large-scale project like this. Catholic teaching reminds us to care for one another and work for the common good (Gaudium et Spes). I do not feel that approving this project without a full environmental review reflects that care. I respectfully ask the City Council to require that this project follow the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan and undergo a thorough environmental review that truly considers noise, vibration, and construction hours. Please allow this project to return in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who depend on it. Thank you for listening to my concerns and for protecting the communities that make Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Diego Tabares
--.-
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:03 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner who comes to Mass every week and cares deeply about our church.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It's where I come to pray, to find some quiet, and to feel at peace. Our church is also a beautiful and historic building designed by Roland Coate, and it means a great deal to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I understand that Pasadena wants to grow and support new development, and I respect that. But I'm very worried about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for people like me. Construction often starts as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, trucks, and ground shaking would make it hard to attend Mass, especially for older parishioners. It's difficult to pray when there's loud construction outside, and I worry about Masses, funerals, and weddings being interrupted. I'm also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building. It was never meant to be next to a large project like this. As Catholics, we're taught to look out for one another and to do what's best for the commonness good. I don't feel that approving this project without a full environmental review does that. I'm simply asking the City Council to slow this down, require a proper environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please let this project come back in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who come here every week. Thank you for taking the time to listen to a parishioner who just wants to keep my cherished church peaceful and the spiritual place it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
JOANN HUNDLEY
PASADENA, CA 91104 Constituent
. . .
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:05 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: 1364 E. Green Street Opposition - Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: 1364 E. Green Street Opposition - Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred and historic place of worship, designed by renowned architect Roland Coate, whose work is an important part of Pasadena's architectural heritage. This church is not only a place of prayer and sacrament, but a cultural and spiritual landmark that serves generations of families. Catholic Social Teaching calls us to uphold the common good and protect human dignity (Gaudium et Spes), values that depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, respectful, and peaceful. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions such as Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Construction associated with a project of this intensity—often beginning as early as 7:00 a.m. and continuing for many hours each day—raises serious concerns for our parish. Noise, heavy equipment, truck traffic, and ground vibration threaten to disrupt Masses, funerals, weddings, religious education, and times of prayer and reflection. Vibration is of particular concern given the church's historic design and materials. Prolonged construction activity could place stress on a structure never intended to be adjacent to large-scale R&D development, risking both physical damage and the loss of the quiet reverence essential to worship. Approving the project without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, places an unfair burden on a historic church and its parishioners. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review that fully addresses construction noise, vibration, and hours of operation. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects stewardship, protects our historic parish, and respects the sacred nature of worship.
Sincerely,
MICHAEL MITCHELL
PASADENA, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:17 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street [ İ ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a longtime Catholic parishioner who attends Mass regularly and cares deeply about our church and its future. For many of us, this parish is the center of our spiritual lives. It is where I come each week to pray, find peace, and feel close to God. Our church, designed by Roland Coate, is a beautiful and historic place, and the quiet and reverence of the space mean so much to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I support Pasadena's growth and understand the importance of innovation, but I worry that the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street would make it very difficult for parishioners like me. Construction often begins as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, heavy trucks, and ground vibration could easily disrupt daily and weekend Masses, funerals, weddings, and times of prayer. Many parishioners are older and move more slowly, and increased traffic and noise would make attending Mass more stressful and less safe. I am also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building, which was never meant to sit next to a large-scale project like this. Catholic teaching reminds us to care for one another and work for the common good (Gaudium et Spes). I do not feel that approving this project without a full environmental review reflects that care. I respectfully ask the City Council to require that this project follow the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan and undergo a thorough environmental review that truly considers noise, vibration, and construction hours. Please allow this project to return in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who depend on it. Thank you for listening to my concerns and for protecting the communities that make Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Carlos Madrigal
-
Los Angeles, CA 90032 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:18 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Respect Our Sacred Space- St. Philip the Apostle [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Respect Our Sacred Space- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of the historic church on Green Street. For many of us, this parish is a second home — a place of prayer, peace, and community. It is also a treasured Roland Coate landmark that has been part of Pasadena's character for generations. I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street. Early-morning construction, heavy trucks, and vibration would disrupt Mass, funerals, and weddings, and could impact our historic church building. A project of this scale does not belong immediately beside a sacred space and an established neighborhood. This is not opposition to growth. It is a call for balance and respect. I urge the Council to require a full environmental review and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect our church, our neighborhood, and the character that makes Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Jose Madrigal
Los Angeles, CA 90032 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:41 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Marilyn Rivera
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:44 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Preserving What Makes Pasadena Pasadena - 1364 East Green Street Opposition [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Preserving What Makes Pasadena Pasadena- 1364 East Green Street Opposition Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who cares deeply about our city and the qualities that make Pasadena unique.
Our tree-lined streets, historic neighborhoods, human-scale buildings, and thoughtful planning traditions are not accidental — they are the result of decades of careful stewardship. Growth is part of any thriving city, and innovation has long been part of Pasadena's identity. But growth must respect the character, scale, and livability of our neighborhoods. Increasingly, new developments feel oversized and out of proportion to their surroundings. When buildings loom over adjacent homes or dramatically alter the rhythm of a street, it chips away at the very character that draws people here. Preserving what makes Pasadena special does not mean rejecting change. It means ensuring that change enhances our community rather than overwhelms it. It means respecting established neighborhoods, protecting transitions between residential and commercial areas, and maintaining the human scale that defines our city. Just as important, it means restoring public confidence in the planning process. Residents need to know that long-standing standards matter, that community input is taken seriously, and that decisions are guided by clear principles — not simply by what can be built to the maximum limit. Pasadena's strength has always been its balance: innovation alongside tradition, progress alongside preservation. I urge you to uphold that balance and ensure future development protects the character, charm, and livability that truly make Pasadena, Pasadena.
Sincerely,
Marilyn Rivera
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:42 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [ 1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I write as a Catholic parishioner with deep concern for the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place. It is where we gather to worship God, receive the sacraments, educate our children in faith, care for the poor, and offer refuge to those seeking peace and healing. The Church's mission depends not only on what happens inside our walls, but also on the surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of this sacred purpose. The Catholic tradition teaches us to value human dignity, stewardship of creation, and care for the most vulnerable among us. For these reasons, I am troubled that this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale currently proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, risks disrupting the life of our parish and undermining the sense of safety and reverence that parishioners depend upon.
Traffic congestion, noise, air quality, and safety concerns are not theoretical. They affect families arriving for Mass, children attending religious education, elderly parishioners with limited mobility, and those who come to our church seeking prayer, counseling, or quiet refuge. A redesigned project that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes a thorough environmental review would better reflect the values of care, balance, and responsibility that Pasadena claims to uphold. Approving this project as proposed would set a troubling precedent—suggesting that churches and other sensitive institutions may be asked to bear the burdens of growth without adequate protection or consideration. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors both economic progress and the spiritual and communal life of our city. Pasadena can grow in a way that respects faith communities, protects human dignity, and reflects true stewardship. I ask that you choose that path.
Sincerely,
Nora Peralta
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 2:47 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Prayerful Request for Discernment and Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Prayerful Request for Discernment and Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent at St. Philip the Apostle School, and I am writing to you with a humble and prayerful request regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, which is so close to our school, church, and neighborhood. Each day, as parents, we entrust our children to the care of others and to God's protection, hoping they are learning and growing in a safe, peaceful, and nurturing environment. Because of this, I feel a deep concern about the possibility of extended construction near the school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the presence of an R&D facility whose research activities have not been clearly explained. These uncertainties are difficult for families when children's well-being is at stake. I want to express my gratitude for your service to the City and my respect for Caltech's contributions to Pasadena. At the same time, schools and churches are sacred spaces in our community-places where children learn, families gather, and faith is formed. Decisions that affect these spaces deserve special care, patience, and transparency. I respectfully ask the City Council to pause and prayerfully discern whether this project, as proposed, truly reflects our shared responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us. A thorough environmental and safety review, respect for existing height and zoning limits, and thoughtful placement of high-intensity R&D uses in appropriate commercial or industrial areas would help reassure families and ensure they are heard. My hope is that the City's decision will be guided by wisdom, stewardship, and a commitment to the common good, especially for the children who depend on us to make careful choices on their behalf. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration.
Sincerely,
Ashley Finnance Armstrong
Los Angeles, CA 90065 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 3:15 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a St. Philip the Apostle parishioner who believes we must protect the places that anchor our community. Our churches, schools, and long-established neighborhoods are not just structures on a map — they are the foundations of daily life in Pasadena. They provide stability, belonging, and continuity across generations. When large-scale development such as that at 1364 E. Green Street is proposed immediately beside these anchors, it raises serious concerns. Sacred spaces and neighborhood institutions depend on peace, safety, and compatibility with their surroundings. Construction impacts, increased traffic, noise, and projects that are out of scale can disrupt more than routines — they can erode the sense of place that holds a community together. Pasadena has long been admired for thoughtful planning that balances growth with preservation. That balance is essential. Growth should strengthen the institutions that define us, not overshadow or strain them. I respectfully urge you to ensure that projects near churches, schools, and established neighborhoods undergo thorough review and are appropriately scaled to their settings. Protecting what anchors our community is not opposition to progress — it is a commitment to responsible stewardship. Please safeguard the places that give Pasadena its identity and heart.
Sincerely,
Eric Gama
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 3:49 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of a historic church on Hill Avenue.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It is where we gather for Mass, funerals, weddings, and quiet prayer. It is a place of peace — and a beautiful historic building designed by Roland Coate that has stood as part of Pasadena's character for generations. I understand that Pasadena must grow. But I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it would mean for our church and the surrounding neighborhood. Early-morning construction, heavy truck traffic, and ground vibration would disrupt worship and could damage our historic structure. It is hard to pray amid noise and shaking. Our church was never meant to sit beside a project of this scale. More broadly, many residents feel that recent developments are simply too large and out of proportion to their surroundings.
When projects appear driven by maximum height and density rather than compatibility and care, public confidence in the planning process erodes. This is not opposition to growth. It is a plea for balance and respect — for our neighborhoods, our historic buildings, and the sacred spaces that anchor our community. I respectfully ask the Council to slow this process, require a full environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect what makes Pasadena special and restore trust that our planning decisions reflect this community's values.
Sincerely,
James Padilla
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 3:52 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
Jasmin Castaneda
Pasadena, CA 91103 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 4:56 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Personal Concern About 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a longtime Catholic parishioner who attends Mass regularly and cares deeply about our church and its future. For many of us, this parish is the center of our spiritual lives. It is where I come each week to pray, find peace, and feel close to God. Our church, designed by Roland Coate, is a beautiful and historic place, and the quiet and reverence of the space mean so much to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I support Pasadena's growth and understand the importance of innovation, but I worry that the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street would make it very difficult for parishioners like me. Construction often begins as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, heavy trucks, and ground vibration could easily disrupt daily and weekend Masses, funerals, weddings, and times of prayer. Many parishioners are older and move more slowly, and increased traffic and noise would make attending Mass more stressful and less safe. I am also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building, which was never meant to sit next to a large-scale project like this. Catholic teaching reminds us to care for one another and work for the common good (Gaudium et Spes). I do not feel that approving this project without a full environmental review reflects that care. I respectfully ask the City Council to require that this project follow the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan and undergo a thorough environmental review that truly considers noise, vibration, and construction hours. Please allow this project to return in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who depend on it. Thank you for listening to my concerns and for protecting the communities that make Pasadena special.
Sincerely,
Mary Ambrose
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 5:31 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces - St. Philip the Apostle [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who believes that sacred spaces deserve special care and protection.
Churches are not simply buildings — they are places of worship, reflection, community, and comfort during life's most important moments. They are where families gather for baptisms, weddings, funerals, and weekly prayer. They are anchors of stability in our neighborhoods. I am concerned about development proposals, such as the 1364 E. Green Street project, that place large, high-intensity projects directly beside active houses of worship. Construction noise, heavy truck traffic, vibration, and long-term operational impacts can disrupt services and diminish the peaceful environment these spaces require. Sacred spaces should not be treated like ordinary parcels of land. Growth is important, but it must be balanced with respect for community institutions. Pasadena has long taken pride in thoughtful planning that protects historic buildings and sensitive uses. That tradition should continue by ensuring projects adjacent to churches undergo the highest level of environmental scrutiny and are scaled appropriately to their surroundings. Safeguarding sacred spaces is not about resisting progress — it is about preserving the spiritual and cultural foundations that hold our community together. I respectfully urge the Council to prioritize the protection of our churches and ensure that development decisions reflect the care these institutions deserve.
Sincerely,
Gregory Hankins
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 5:44 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship /1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship /1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred and historic place of worship, designed by renowned architect Roland Coate, whose work is an important part of Pasadena's architectural heritage. This church is not only a place of prayer and sacrament, but a cultural and spiritual landmark that serves generations of families. Catholic Social Teaching calls us to uphold the common good and protect human dignity (Gaudium et Spes), values that depend on a safe and respectful surrounding environment. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions such as Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Construction activity of this intensity raises serious concerns about noise, vibration, traffic, and access, including the potential for Masses, funerals, weddings, and other worship services to be disrupted. Approving the project without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, places an unfair burden on a historic church and its parishioners. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects stewardship, protects our historic parish, and respects the sacred nature of worship.
Sincerely,
Virginia Castellano
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 5:55 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
Stephanie Castellano Laguna
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OnelickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 5:56 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation, economic growth, and research and development. At the same time, churches play a vital role in our city as places of worship, reflection, education, and service. These missions depend on safe, accessible, and appropriately scaled surroundings that respect sensitive uses and neighborhood character. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the currently proposed scale. Proceeding without a full environmental review—and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street—raises serious concerns for parishioners, including traffic safety, noise, air quality, and overall compatibility with church activities. Requiring the project to return in a redesigned form that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's maximum height of approximately 51 feet and that undergoes a thorough environmental analysis would better align the development with the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive institutions. This approach would help preserve community trust while still supporting Pasadena's broader innovation goals. Approving the project as proposed would set a troubling precedent for placing intensified R&D uses adjacent to churches and other sensitive community institutions in areas not clearly intended for such development under Pasadena's planning framework. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to move forward only in a form that reflects both economic ambition and respect for our church community and shared values.
Sincerely,
Reina Lopez
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 6:38 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
Juan Gallegos
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 6:52 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Rigoberto Tabares
El Monte, CA 91731 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 7:00 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of a historic church on Hill Avenue.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It is where we gather for Mass, funerals, weddings, and quiet prayer. It is a place of peace — and a beautiful historic building designed by Roland Coate that has stood as part of Pasadena's character for generations. I understand that Pasadena must grow. But I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it would mean for our church and the surrounding neighborhood. Early-morning construction, heavy truck traffic, and ground vibration would disrupt worship and could damage our historic structure. It is hard to pray amid noise and shaking. Our church was never meant to sit beside a project of this scale. More broadly, many residents feel that recent developments are simply too large and out of proportion to their surroundings.
When projects appear driven by maximum height and density rather than compatibility and care, public confidence in the planning process erodes. This is not opposition to growth. It is a plea for balance and respect - for our neighborhoods, our historic buildings, and the sacred spaces that anchor our community. I respectfully ask the Council to slow this process, require a full environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect what makes Pasadena special and restore trust that our planning decisions reflect this community's values.
Sincerely,
Martha Salcedo
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 7:05 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner who comes to Mass every week and cares deeply about our church.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It's where I come to pray, to find some quiet, and to feel at peace. Our church is also a beautiful and historic building designed by Roland Coate, and it means a great deal to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I understand that Pasadena wants to grow and support new development, and I respect that. But I'm very worried about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for people like me. Construction often starts as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, trucks, and ground shaking would make it hard to attend Mass, especially for older parishioners. It's difficult to pray when there's loud construction outside, and I worry about Masses, funerals, and weddings being interrupted. I'm also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building. It was never meant to be next to a large project like this. As Catholics, we're taught to look out for one another and to do what's best for the common good. I don't feel that approving this project without a full environmental review does that. I'm simply asking the City Council to slow this down, require a proper environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please let this project come back in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who come here every week. Thank you for taking the time to listen to a parishioner who just wants to keep my cherished church peaceful and the spiritual place it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
Jaime Benavides
Alhambra, CA 91801-1261 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 8:02 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I write as a Catholic parishioner and mother with deep concern for the proposed development at 1364 E.
Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place. It is where we gather to worship God, receive the sacraments, educate our children in faith, care for the poor, and offer refuge to those seeking peace and healing. The Church's mission depends not only on what happens inside our walls, but also on the surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of this sacred purpose. The Catholic tradition teaches us to value human dignity, stewardship of creation, and care for the most vulnerable among us. For these reasons, I am troubled that this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale currently proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, risks disrupting the life of our parish and undermining the sense of safety and reverence that parishioners depend upon. Traffic congestion, noise, air quality, and safety concerns are not theoretical. They affect families arriving for Mass, children attending religious education, elderly parishioners with limited mobility, and those who come to our church seeking prayer, counseling, or quiet refuge. A redesigned project that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes a thorough environmental review would better reflect the values of care, balance, and responsibility that Pasadena claims to uphold. Approving this project as proposed would set a troubling precedent— suggesting that churches and other sensitive institutions may be asked to bear the burdens of growth without adequate protection or consideration. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors both economic progress and the spiritual and communal life of our city. Pasadena can grow in a way that respects faith communities, protects human dignity, and reflects true stewardship. I ask that you choose that path.
Sincerely,
Carolina Pimentel
San Marino, CA 91108 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 8:03 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [ 1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
Kevin Sanchez
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 8:31 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship /1364 E. Green Street [ 1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Protecting Our Historic Parish and Worship /1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred and historic place of worship, designed by renowned architect Roland Coate, whose work is an important part of Pasadena's architectural heritage. This church is not only a place of prayer and sacrament, but a cultural and spiritual landmark that serves generations of families. Catholic Social Teaching calls us to uphold the common good and protect human dignity (Gaudium et Spes), values that depend on a safe and respectful surrounding environment. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions such as Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Construction activity of this intensity raises serious concerns about noise, vibration, traffic, and access, including the potential for Masses, funerals, weddings, and other worship services to be disrupted. Approving the project without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, places an unfair burden on a historic church and its parishioners. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects stewardship, protects our historic parish, and respects the sacred nature of worship.
Sincerely,
Phillip Castellano
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2026 9:48 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's thoughts on 1364 E. Green Street [ 1 ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's thoughts on 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parishioner at St. Philip the Apostle Church and would like to say that I am fine with Cal Tech building at this location. I think the previous "deal" that St. Philip made with Cal Tech that included altering the design plans, paying to move pre-K and fixing the front doors of the church was a very generous deal. Maybe I'm missing something but I truly don't see why there is such concern about this building being built. Maybe some of the future employees there will make St. Philip Church their home. A great partnership could happen between the school and Cal Tech. Yes, the building of it will be loud and dusty but that's just life in a city. When St. Philip built the new school about twenty years ago, I'm sure some of the neighbors didn't care for all the noise and dust it produced. Anyway, I just wanted to say that not all of the parishioners are against the current Cal Tech plans.
Sincerely,
Sheryl Valdez
Pasadena, CA 91107-5151 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 6:24 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Protect What Anchors Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a St. Philip the Apostle parishioner who believes we must protect the places that anchor our community. Our churches, schools, and long-established neighborhoods are not just structures on a map — they are the foundations of daily life in Pasadena. They provide stability, belonging, and continuity across generations. When large-scale development such as that at 1364 E. Green Street is proposed immediately beside these anchors, it raises serious concerns. Sacred spaces and neighborhood institutions depend on peace, safety, and compatibility with their surroundings. Construction impacts, increased traffic, noise, and projects that are out of scale can disrupt more than routines — they can erode the sense of place that holds a community together. Pasadena has long been admired for thoughtful planning that balances growth with preservation. That balance is essential. Growth should strengthen the institutions that define us, not overshadow or strain them. I respectfully urge you to ensure that projects near churches, schools, and established neighborhoods undergo thorough review and are appropriately scaled to their settings. Protecting what anchors our community is not opposition to progress — it is a commitment to responsible stewardship. Please safeguard the places that give Pasadena its identity and heart.
Sincerely,
Judy Kessinger
Pasadena, CA 91101 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 8:17 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces - St. Philip the Apostle [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who believes that sacred spaces deserve special care and protection.
Churches are not simply buildings - they are places of worship, reflection, community, and comfort during life's most important moments. They are where families gather for baptisms, weddings, funerals, and weekly prayer. They are anchors of stability in our neighborhoods. I am concerned about development proposals, such as the 1364 E. Green Street project, that place large, high-intensity projects directly beside active houses of worship. Construction noise, heavy truck traffic, vibration, and long-term operational impacts can disrupt services and diminish the peaceful environment these spaces require. Sacred spaces should not be treated like ordinary parcels of land. Growth is important, but it must be balanced with respect for community institutions. Pasadena has long taken pride in thoughtful planning that protects historic buildings and sensitive uses. That tradition should continue by ensuring projects adjacent to churches undergo the highest level of environmental scrutiny and are scaled appropriately to their surroundings. Safeguarding sacred spaces is not about resisting progress — it is about preserving the spiritual and cultural foundations that hold our community together. I respectfully urge the Council to prioritize the protection of our churches and ensure that development decisions reflect the care these institutions deserve.
Sincerely,
ROBERTA Barron
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:03 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Prayerful Request for Discernment and Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School 1 1 1 CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Prayerful Request for Discernment and Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent at St. Philip the Apostle School, and I am writing to you with a humble and prayerful request regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, which is so close to our school, church, and neighborhood. Each day, as parents, we entrust our children to the care of others and to God's protection, hoping they are learning and growing in a safe, peaceful, and nurturing environment. Because of this, I feel a deep concern about the possibility of extended construction near the school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the presence of an R&D facility whose research activities have not been clearly explained. These uncertainties are difficult for families when children's well-being is at stake. I want to express my gratitude for your service to the City and my respect for Caltech's contributions to Pasadena. At the same time, schools and churches are sacred spaces in our community—places where children learn, families gather, and faith is formed. Decisions that affect these spaces deserve special care, patience, and transparency. I respectfully ask the City Council to pause and prayerfully discern whether this project, as proposed, truly reflects our shared responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us. A thorough environmental and safety review, respect for existing height and zoning limits, and thoughtful placement of high-intensity R&D uses in appropriate commercial or industrial areas would help reassure families and ensure they are heard. My hope is that the City's decision will be guided by wisdom, stewardship, and a commitment to the common good, especially for the children who depend on us to make careful choices on their behalf. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration.
Sincerely,
Chris Angeles
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:16 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Call for Safe and Transparent Planning (1364 E. Green Street) [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Call for Safe and Transparent Planning (1364 E. Green Street) Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a resident who supports thoughtful development, world-class innovation, and the important role institutions like Caltech play in our beautiful city. At the same time, we believe development must be safe, transparent, and compatible with the neighborhoods in which it is proposed. I am concerned that the proposed R&D project at 1364 E. Green Street has not been adequately demonstrated to be safe, given its location next to a grade school, an active church, and established residential neighborhoods. In particular, we believe the environmental review has not sufficiently addressed potential health, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts on these sensitive uses. I respectfully ask the City Council to reverse the Design Commission's approval and require a proper and comprehensive environmental analysis before the project proceeds. This step is essential to ensuring that decisions are based on sound information and that community impacts are fully understood and appropriately addressed. I also believe reasonable compromises are possible. Community representatives have indicated a willingness to support a project limited to 51 feet in height, provided it is accompanied by a satisfactory environmental review demonstrating that it can operate safely in this location. More broadly, we urge the City Council to revisit its November 2023 General Plan modification that allows R&D facilities citywide. R&D facilities with increased height allowances should be concentrated along established commercial corridors such as Fair Oaks, Colorado, and Lake-not on streets directly adjacent to residential neighborhoods, including Green Street. Finally, I am concerned that recent broad amendments to the R&D code were adopted without sufficient consideration of their potential impact on nearby schools, churches, homes, and families. If this can occur on Holliston, it could happen elsewhere. These changes risk introducing health, traffic, and other hazards into areas that were previously protected by longstanding zoning and planning standards. We ask the City Council to take action to ensure responsible development, protect neighborhood livability, and restore public confidence in the planning process.
Sincerely,
Nathan Moniz
.. --
Redondo Beach, CA 90278 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:24 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
Ana Raptis
• Arcadia, CA 91006 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:48 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: When Density Goes Too Far- Caltech and 1364 E. Green Street [ 1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: When Density Goes Too Far- Caltech and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a Pasadena resident who is increasingly concerned about the scale and density of recent developments. Many of the new buildings being approved are simply too large for their surroundings.
They overwhelm nearby homes, alter the character of our streets, and leave residents questioning whether long-standing planning principles are still being upheld. Pasadena has a proud tradition of thoughtful, human-scale planning. When oversized projects are approved without clear compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, public trust is undermined. This is not opposition to growth. It is a call for balanced, contextual development that respects the scale and character of our city. Residents deserve a planning process that is transparent, consistent, and responsive to community input. I urge the Council to take concrete steps to restore confidence by ensuring future development reflects Pasadena's established standards and values — not just maximum allowable density.
Sincerely,
Guido Bryant
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 12:16 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street [İ ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place where we gather for worship, receive the sacraments, and serve others. These ministries depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of sensitive uses. As Catholics, we are called to uphold human dignity, care for our neighbors, and act as good stewards of our community. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions like Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this street, raises real concerns for parishioners—especially families, children, and elderly members of our community. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Doing so would better reflect both Pasadena's planning goals and respect for faith communities. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors stewardship, safety, and the vital role our church plays in the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Amanda Stonnington
San Marino, CA 91108-1117 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 1:00 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Jennie de Cardenas
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 1:01 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner who comes to Mass every week and cares deeply about our church.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It's where I come to pray, to find some quiet, and to feel at peace. Our church is also a beautiful and historic building designed by Roland Coate, and it means a great deal to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I understand that Pasadena wants to grow and support new development, and | respect that. But I'm very worried about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for people like me. Construction often starts as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, trucks, and ground shaking would make it hard to attend Mass, especially for older parishioners. It's difficult to pray when there's loud construction outside, and I worry about Masses, funerals, and weddings being interrupted. I'm also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building. It was never meant to be next to a large project like this. As Catholics, we're taught to look out for one another and to do what's best for the common good. I don't feel that approving this project without a full environmental review does that. I'm simply asking the City Council to slow this down, require a proper environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please let this project come back in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who come here every week. Thank you for taking the time to listen to a parishioner who just wants to keep my cherished church peaceful and the spiritual place it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
Kat Raptis
Arcadia, CA 91006 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 1:21 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street [1 ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner who comes to Mass every week and cares deeply about our church.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It's where I come to pray, to find some quiet, and to feel at peace. Our church is also a beautiful and historic building designed by Roland Coate, and it means a great deal to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I understand that Pasadena wants to grow and support new development, and I respect that. But I'm very worried about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for people like me. Construction often starts as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, trucks, and ground shaking would make it hard to attend Mass, especially for older parishioners. It's difficult to pray when there's loud construction outside, and I worry about Masses, funerals, and weddings being interrupted. I'm also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building. It was never meant to be next to a large project like this. As Catholics, we're taught to look out for one another and to do what's best for the common good. I don't feel that approving this project without a full environmental review does that. I'm simply asking the City Council to slow this down, require a proper environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please let this project come back in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who come here every week. Thank you for taking the time to listen to a parishioner who just wants to keep my cherished church peaceful and the spiritual place it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
Christopher Escueta
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 1:30 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church |[1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of a historic church on Hill Avenue.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It is where we gather for Mass, funerals, weddings, and quiet prayer. It is a place of peace — and a beautiful historic building designed by Roland Coate that has stood as part of Pasadena's character for generations. I understand that Pasadena must grow. But I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it would mean for our church and the surrounding neighborhood. Early-morning construction, heavy truck traffic, and ground vibration would disrupt worship and could damage our historic structure. It is hard to pray amid noise and shaking. Our church was never meant to sit beside a project of this scale. More broadly, many residents feel that recent developments are simply too large and out of proportion to their surroundings.
When projects appear driven by maximum height and density rather than compatibility and care, public confidence in the planning process erodes. This is not opposition to growth. It is a plea for balance and respect — for our neighborhoods, our historic buildings, and the sacred spaces that anchor our community. I respectfully ask the Council to slow this process, require a full environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect what makes Pasadena special and restore trust that our planning decisions reflect this community's values.
Sincerely,
Sofia Malloy
Arcadia, CA 91006 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 1:33 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Honor Our Church and Honor Our City- 1364 East Green St. Concerns Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a resident and a parishioner, and I believe that how we treat our sacred spaces reflects who we are as a city. To honor our church is to honor Pasadena itself. Our church is more than a structure. It is a historic landmark, a spiritual home, and a gathering place for generations of families. It is where we celebrate baptisms and weddings, mourn loved ones at funerals, and come each week seeking peace and reflection. It stands as part of the architectural and cultural fabric that gives Pasadena its identity. When large-scale development, such as the 1364 E. Green St. project, is proposed directly beside such a sacred and historic place, it raises serious concerns. Construction noise, truck traffic, vibration, and the sheer scale of adjacent buildings can disrupt worship and diminish the quiet dignity that a church requires. Sacred spaces deserve thoughtful protection, not simply technical compliance. Growth and innovation are important to our city's future. But they must be balanced with respect for our history, our neighborhoods, and the institutions that anchor our community life.
Pasadena has long prided itself on careful planning and stewardship. Upholding that legacy means ensuring that development enhances — rather than overwhelms — the places that define us. I respectfully urge you to require a thorough review and an appropriate scale for any project near our church. By doing so, you will honor both a cherished house of worship and the values that have long guided Pasadena's development.
Sincerely,
George Raptis
Arcadia, CA 91006 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 1:58 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Concern About Our Church and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I'm writing as a longtime parishioner who comes to Mass every week and cares deeply about our church.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It's where I come to pray, to find some quiet, and to feel at peace. Our church is also a beautiful and historic building designed by Roland Coate, and it means a great deal to those of us who have worshipped here for many years. I understand that Pasadena wants to grow and support new development, and I respect that. But I'm very worried about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for people like me. Construction often starts as early as 7:00 in the morning, and the noise, trucks, and ground shaking would make it hard to attend Mass, especially for older parishioners. It's difficult to pray when there's loud construction outside, and I worry about Masses, funerals, and weddings being interrupted. I'm also concerned that vibration could affect our historic church building. It was never meant to be next to a large project like this. As Catholics, we're taught to look out for one another and to do what's best for the common good. I don't feel that approving this project without a full environmental review does that. I'm simply asking the City Council to slow this down, require a proper environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please let this project come back in a form that respects our church, our worship, and the people who come here every week. Thank you for taking the time to listen to a parishioner who just wants to keep my cherished church peaceful and the spiritual place it was intended to be.
Sincerely,
Eugenia M Munoz
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 2:18 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I write as a Catholic parishioner with deep concern for the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place. It is where we gather to worship God, receive the sacraments, educate our children in faith, care for the poor, and offer refuge to those seeking peace and healing. The Church's mission depends not only on what happens inside our walls, but also on the surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of this sacred purpose. The Catholic tradition teaches us to value human dignity, stewardship of creation, and care for the most vulnerable among us. For these reasons, I am troubled that this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale currently proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, risks disrupting the life of our parish and undermining the sense of safety and reverence that parishioners depend upon.
Traffic congestion, noise, air quality, and safety concerns are not theoretical. They affect families arriving for Mass, children attending religious education, elderly parishioners with limited mobility, and those who come to our church seeking prayer, counseling, or quiet refuge. A redesigned project that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes a thorough environmental review would better reflect the values of care, balance, and responsibility that Pasadena claims to uphold. Approving this project as proposed would set a troubling precedent-suggesting that churches and other sensitive institutions may be asked to bear the burdens of growth without adequate protection or consideration. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors both economic progress and the spiritual and communal life of our city. Pasadena can grow in a way that respects faith communities, protects human dignity, and reflects true stewardship. I ask that you choose that path.
Sincerely,
Peter Raptis
Arcadia, CA 91006 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 2:28 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Please Restore Confidence in Pasadena's Planning Process - 1364 E. Green St. [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Please Restore Confidence in Pasadena's Planning Process - 1364 E. Green St.
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a longtime Pasadena resident who cares deeply about our city and its future. I understand that growth is inevitable and that innovation and housing are important. However, I am increasingly concerned about the scale and density of recent developments and what they mean for our community's character. Many of the new buildings being approved seem simply too large for the neighborhoods where they are being placed. They overwhelm surrounding homes, change the scale of our streets, and leave residents wondering whether long-standing planning principles still guide decision-making. When projects appear out of proportion to their surroundings, it erodes public trust. Pasadena has long been known for thoughtful planning, human-scale neighborhoods, and careful transitions between commercial and residential areas. That tradition is one of the reasons many of us chose to live here.
When dense, oversized developments are approved without clear justification or meaningful responsiveness to community concerns, it creates the perception that established standards are being set aside. This is not about opposing growth outright. It is about ensuring that growth is balanced, contextual, and consistent with our city's character. Development should enhance neighborhoods — not overshadow them. I respectfully urge the City Council to take steps to restore public confidence in the planning process. That means ensuring transparency, carefully evaluating scale and compatibility, and demonstrating that community input genuinely influences outcomes. Residents need to feel that planning decisions are guided by clear principles, not simply by what can be maximized on a parcel.
Pasadena's strength has always been its ability to evolve while preserving what makes it special. I hope you will reaffirm that commitment and ensure that future development reflects the values and scale that define our city. Thank you for your time and service.
Sincerely,
Rebecca Peña
Pasadena, CA 91117 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 2:56 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: When Density Goes Too Far- Caltech and 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB001 1474" on the DolT portal.
Re: When Density Goes Too Far- Caltech and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a Pasadena resident who is increasingly concerned about the scale and density of recent developments. Many of the new buildings being approved are simply too large for their surroundings.
They overwhelm nearby homes, alter the character of our streets, and leave residents questioning whether long-standing planning principles are still being upheld. I have concerns about environmental research and worry about my neurodivergent child attending St. Philip next door. Pasadena has a proud tradition of thoughtful, human-scale planning. When oversized projects are approved without clear compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, public trust is undermined. This is not opposition to growth. It is a call for balanced, contextual development that respects the scale and character of our city. Residents deserve a planning process that is transparent, consistent, and responsive to community input. I urge the Council to take concrete steps to restore confidence by ensuring future development reflects Pasadena's established standards and values — not just maximum allowable density.
Sincerely,
Andrea Neff Monks
--
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 3:50 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: When Density Goes Too Far- Caltech and 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: When Density Goes Too Far- Caltech and 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a Pasadena resident who is increasingly concerned about the scale and density of recent developments. Many of the new buildings being approved are simply too large for their surroundings.
They overwhelm nearby homes, alter the character of our streets, and leave residents questioning whether long-standing planning principles are still being upheld. Pasadena has a proud tradition of thoughtful, human-scale planning. When oversized projects are approved without clear compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, public trust is undermined. This is not opposition to growth. It is a call for balanced, contextual development that respects the scale and character of our city. Residents deserve a planning process that is transparent, consistent, and responsive to community input. l urge the Council to take concrete steps to restore confidence by ensuring future development reflects Pasadena's established standards and values — not just maximum allowable density.
Sincerely,
Christine Celata
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 4:24 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Francisco Flores
Altadena, CA 91001 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 4:26 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Pasadena's children: Safety, Environmental and East Colorado Blvd. Zoning Plan [ L] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Pasadena's children: Safety, Environmental and East Colorado Blvd. Zoning Plan Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent at St. Philip the Apostle School, and I am writing to you with a humble and prayerful request regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, which is so close to our school, church, and neighborhood. Last January our son's school in Altadena burned down. After shuffling between three temporary locations, we, along with many other families, decided that our child's safety, stability, security and wellbeing were nonnegotiable. I feel a deep concern about the possibility of extended construction near the school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the presence of an R&D facility whose research activities have not been clearly explained. These uncertainties are difficult for families when children's well-being is at stake. We first set down roots in East Pasadena when moving from the East Coast and we've seen the East Colorado corridor littered with seemingly abandoned, unused lots.
The idea that a large research and development facility can be built next to an active school and church is quite frankly absurd when I see all of the other blight on Colorado Blvd, or what we thought was the heart of Pasadena. We now own a home near Bungalow Heaven in Pasadena so we know there are plenty of other places that are appropriately zoned for this. The fact that neither Pasadena or Caltech seems concerned with transparency toward potential neighbors, the safety of children trying to learn daily and lack of bigger picture zoning/development issues in East Pasadena is egregious. Pasadena has a fancy zoning plan presentation for Lincoln Avenue commercial district but can't figure out how to make Colorado Blvd safe, walkable, and zoned approximately for all of the schools, students and residents east of Lake Avenue? If safety and environmental plans for construction exist, they need to be clearly communicated in a way for a large constituency of concerned and baffled parents and partitioners to understand. I want to express my gratitude for your service to the City and my respect for Caltech's contributions to Pasadena. At the same time, schools and churches are sacred spaces in our community—places where children learn, families gather, and faith is formed. Decisions that affect these spaces deserve special care, patience, and transparency. Currently it seems as though Caltech's interest in a parking lot on Cordova is more important than being respectful of children who have been already been greatly impacted by the Eaton Fire. The fact that I'm even having to send this after looking at soil testing numbers in the area makes me question those in local govt making decisions for Pasadena's children and people who live in your city. At a bare minimum, a thorough environmental and safety review, respect for existing height and zoning limits, and thoughtful placement of high-intensity R&D uses in appropriate commercial or industrial areas must be done to ensure the safety of children and families.
My hope is that the City's decision will be guided by wisdom, stewardship, and a commitment to the common good, especially for the children who depend on us to make careful choices on their behalf.
Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration.
Sincerely,
Justin Blanchard
JAAAA
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 2 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 4:32 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subiect: Community Input for 1364 E Green St
[A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Community Input for 1364 E Green St
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Please do not allow the 1364 E. Green Street project to proceed in its current form, and grant the appeal.
I support development, innovation, and Pasadena's role as a center for research and life sciences. At the same time, the East Colorado Specific Plan was developed through extensive public engagement, with hundreds of residents participating in person and thousands more providing input online. That process was intended to meaningfully guide where and how growth should occur. Did the "research exception" go through the same level of public input and scrutiny? Were excess heights in research building stories clearly calculated and communicated? This project is at a scale that exceeds the environmental context for this location. Setting aside the ECSP's guidance here -- especially for a project next to a school, a church, and homes -- directly undermines the community vision that informed the plan, as well as faith in city government. The proposed building is just too big for this site. Approving the project in its current form would set a precedent for enhanced R&D development in locations not clearly intended under adopted plans. Granting the appeal would allow the City to honor its planning process while refining the project to better align with community expectations.
Sincerely,
Mary Fitzpatrick
1-----
Pasadena, CA 91107-4414 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 4:47 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Public Comment: 1364 East Green Street Development [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Public Comment: 1364 East Green Street Development
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a family member of Fr Joe Moniz a pastor who dedicated his life to community of St.Phillips and as someone who deeply loves Pasadena. Our families were baptized, confirmed, married in this church without the drama of this unecessary infrastructure being suggested which will add to the chaos of traffic of a peaceful existing church community. This city is more than buildings and zoning maps — it is tree-lined streets, historic homes, welcoming front porches, and neighborhoods shaped thoughtfully over generations. Many of us chose Pasadena because of its human scale, architectural character, and long-standing commitment to balanced planning. It feels grounded, beautiful, and livable. Lately, I worry that we are losing that balance. New developments are growing larger and denser, often overwhelming surrounding homes and altering the character of our streets. When projects prioritize maximum height and density over compatibility and context, residents feel unheard and disconnected from decisions that shape our community. For these reasons, I strongly oppose the proposed project at 1364 East Green Street. This development does not reflect the scale or spirit of the surrounding neighborhood and risks further eroding the character that makes Pasadena unique. It also doent belong next to an elementary school like St. Philip the Apostle. Growth is not the enemy — but it must be thoughtful, measured, and respectful of the neighborhoods and schools that give our city its soul. Once scale and character are lost, they cannot be recreated. I urge you to protect our neighborhoods and schools, restore trust in the planning process, and ensure that Pasadena's future reflects the care and stewardship that have defined it for generations.
Sincerely,
Lorraine Nogueira
Granada hills, CA 91344 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 5:44 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces - St. Philip the Apostle [ 1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who believes that sacred spaces deserve special care and protection.
Churches are not simply buildings — they are places of worship, reflection, community, and comfort during life's most important moments. They are where families gather for baptisms, weddings, funerals, and weekly prayer. They are anchors of stability in our neighborhoods. I am concerned about development proposals, such as the 1364 E. Green Street project, that place large, high-intensity projects directly beside active houses of worship. Construction noise, heavy truck traffic, vibration, and long-term operational impacts can disrupt services and diminish the peaceful environment these spaces require. Sacred spaces should not be treated like ordinary parcels of land. Growth is important, but it must be balanced with respect for community institutions. Pasadena has long taken pride in thoughtful planning that protects historic buildings and sensitive uses. That tradition should continue by ensuring projects adjacent to churches undergo the highest level of environmental scrutiny and are scaled appropriately to their surroundings. Safeguarding sacred spaces is not about resisting progress — it is about preserving the spiritual and cultural foundations that hold our community together. I respectfully urge the Council to prioritize the protection of our churches and ensure that development decisions reflect the care these institutions deserve.
Sincerely,
Cesar Tello
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 5:53 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: 1364 East Green Street - Changes Needed
[1 ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: 1364 East Green Street - Changes Needed
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I support encouraging R&D and entrepreneurial endeavors in Pasadena and specifically support Caltech as a long standing member and leader in the community. However, it appears that non-site specific amendments to the Research and Development Code will result in an imposing structure that will dwarf the historical and community feel of the existing church, school, and residences. The City of Pasadena has consistently done an excellent job of ensuring that both residential and commercial developments are approached realistically and with an eye to preserving the beauty of the City and not drown existing smaller historical and community structures and squares. I'm hopeful that there are concessions and compromises that allow a R&D facility, but on a smaller more appropriate scale to the neighborhood and current usage.
Sincerely,
Lauren Gibbs
pasadena, CA 91103 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 6:19 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Urgent: Child Safety Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Urgent: Child Safety Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a grandparent of a child at St. Philip the Apostle School, located just steps from the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, and I am writing with urgent concerns about the safety of our children and community if this project moves forward as proposed. This development would place major construction activity, increased traffic, and an R&D facility with undefined research uses directly next to a school and church. As a parent, I find it deeply troubling that children could be exposed to construction hazards, unsafe traffic conditions on Green Street, and unknown operational risks without a clear and reassuring environmental and safety analysis. While I support responsible development and value Caltech's role in Pasadena, projects adjacent to schools demand the highest level of caution and transparency. At this time, those standards have not been met. Allowing this project to proceed without a stronger review places children and families at unnecessary risk. I respectfully but firmly urge the City Council to pause this proposal, require a comprehensive safety and environmental review, uphold existing height limits, and ensure R&D uses are restricted to appropriate commercial or industrial corridors—not neighborhood streets next to schools. Please act now to protect our children and prevent irreversible impacts to our school and neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Sally Manaliti
_ Chula Vista, CA 91915 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 6:20 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Urgent: Child Safety Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Urgent: Child Safety Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent of a child at St. Philip the Apostle School, located just steps from the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, and I am writing with urgent concerns about the safety of our children and community if this project moves forward as proposed. This development would place major construction activity, increased traffic, and an R&D facility with undefined research uses directly next to a school and church. As a parent, I find it deeply troubling that children could be exposed to construction hazards, unsafe traffic conditions on Green Street, and unknown operational risks without a clear and reassuring environmental and safety analysis. While I support responsible development and value Caltech's role in Pasadena, projects adjacent to schools demand the highest level of caution and transparency. At this time, those standards have not been met. Allowing this project to proceed without a stronger review places children and families at unnecessary risk. I respectfully but firmly urge the City Council to pause this proposal, require a comprehensive safety and environmental review, uphold existing height limits, and ensure R&D uses are restricted to appropriate commercial or industrial corridors—not neighborhood streets next to schools. Please act now to protect our children and prevent irreversible impacts to our school and neighborhood.
Sincerely,
David Quach
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 9:02 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Prayerful Request for Discernment and Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Prayerful Request for Discernment and Care Near St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a parent at St. Philip the Apostle School, and I am writing to you with a humble and prayerful request regarding the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street, which is so close to our school, church, and neighborhood. Each day, as parents, we entrust our children to the care of others and to God's protection, hoping they are learning and growing in a safe, peaceful, and nurturing environment. Because of this, I feel a deep concern about the possibility of extended construction near the school, increased traffic on Green Street, and the presence of an R&D facility whose research activities have not been clearly explained. These uncertainties are difficult for families when children's well-being is at stake. I want to express my gratitude for your service to the City and my respect for Caltech's contributions to Pasadena. At the same time, schools and churches are sacred spaces in our community—places where children learn, families gather, and faith is formed. Decisions that affect these spaces deserve special care, patience, and transparency. I respectfully ask the City Council to pause and prayerfully discern whether this project, as proposed, truly reflects our shared responsibility to protect the most vulnerable among us. A thorough environmental and safety review, respect for existing height and zoning limits, and thoughtful placement of high-intensity R&D uses in appropriate commercial or industrial areas would help reassure families and ensure they are heard. My hope is that the City's decision will be guided by wisdom, stewardship, and a commitment to the common good, especially for the children who depend on us to make careful choices on their behalf. Thank you for your time, your service, and your consideration.
Sincerely,
Brandi Mathisen
South Pasadena, CA 91030 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 9:14 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place where we gather for worship, receive the sacraments, and serve others. These ministries depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of sensitive uses. As Catholics, we are called to uphold human dignity, care for our neighbors, and act as good stewards of our community. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions like Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this street, raises real concerns for parishioners—especially families, children, and elderly members of our community. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Doing so would better reflect both Pasadena's planning goals and respect for faith communities. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors stewardship, safety, and the vital role our church plays in the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Denise Guerra
Pasadena, CA 91101-2416 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:42 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Request to Grant Appeal - R&D Project at 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Request to Grant Appeal - R&D Project at 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Why has a high-intensity R&D project been allowed to advance directly adjacent to an active school without full environmental review, clear disclosure of research uses, or a design that reflects the City's own planning standards? I am a St Philip the Apostle parent writing regarding the proposed R&D project at 1364 E. Green Street. I support Pasadena's efforts to attract life sciences employers and retain Caltech-connected innovation. However, when development is proposed next to a school, the City has a heightened responsibility to ensure projects proceed at an appropriate scale and with full transparency.
This project moved forward without a comprehensive environmental review despite its immediate proximity to children and daily school operations. A redesign at a smaller, neighborhood-scaled height— consistent with the East Colorado Specific Plan, which envisions a maximum height of approximately 51 feet at this location-would better reflect the intended transition between commercial development and neighborhood-scale uses. A full environmental review is necessary to adequately assess traffic, safety, and operational impacts before construction begins, not after concerns have been raised. Approving this project in its current form would set a troubling precedent by enabling enhanced R&D development near schools in locations not clearly intended under the General Plan or the East Colorado Specific Plan.
Doing so increases the likelihood of future appeals, disputes, and erosion of public trust in the City's planning process. I respectfully urge the City Council to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that supports economic growth without compromising children's safety or established planning policies. Thank you for your careful consideration and your responsibility to the families and educators who depend on thoughtful, accountable decision-making.
Sincerely,
Morgan Medina
Pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 9:39 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect the Heart of Our Community- St. Philip the Apostle Church Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as both a Pasadena resident and a longtime parishioner of a historic church on Hill Avenue.
For many of us, this parish is a second home. It is where we gather for Mass, funerals, weddings, and quiet prayer. It is a place of peace — and a beautiful historic building designed by Roland Coate that has stood as part of Pasadena's character for generations. I understand that Pasadena must grow. But I am deeply concerned about the proposed project at 1364 E. Green Street and what it would mean for our church and the surrounding neighborhood. Early-morning construction, heavy truck traffic, and ground vibration would disrupt worship and could damage our historic structure. It is hard to pray amid noise and shaking. Our church was never meant to sit beside a project of this scale. More broadly, many residents feel that recent developments are simply too large and out of proportion to their surroundings.
When projects appear driven by maximum height and density rather than compatibility and care, public confidence in the planning process erodes. This is not opposition to growth. It is a plea for balance and respect — for our neighborhoods, our historic buildings, and the sacred spaces that anchor our community. I respectfully ask the Council to slow this process, require a full environmental review, and ensure the project complies with the 51-foot height limit in the East Colorado Specific Plan. Please protect what makes Pasadena special and restore trust that our planning decisions reflect this community's values.
Sincerely,
Michael Ferraro
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 9:44 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces- St. Philip the Apostle [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces- St. Philip the Apostle
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who believes that sacred spaces deserve special care and protection.
Churches are not simply buildings — they are places of worship, reflection, community, and comfort during life's most important moments. They are where families gather for baptisms, weddings, funerals, and weekly prayer. They are anchors of stability in our neighborhoods. I am concerned about development proposals, such as the 1364 E. Green Street project, that place large, high-intensity projects directly beside active houses of worship. Construction noise, heavy truck traffic, vibration, and long-term operational impacts can disrupt services and diminish the peaceful environment these spaces require. Sacred spaces should not be treated like ordinary parcels of land. Growth is important, but it must be balanced with respect for community institutions. Pasadena has long taken pride in thoughtful planning that protects historic buildings and sensitive uses. That tradition should continue by ensuring projects adjacent to churches undergo the highest level of environmental scrutiny and are scaled appropriately to their surroundings. Safeguarding sacred spaces is not about resisting progress — it is about preserving the spiritual and cultural foundations that hold our community together. I respectfully urge the Council to prioritize the protection of our churches and ensure that development decisions reflect the care these institutions deserve.
Sincerely,
Michael Ferraro
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 10:37 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Concerns re: 1364 E. Green Street
[A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Concerns re: 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing regarding the proposed 93,500-square-foot research and development facility at 1364 E.
Green Street, scheduled for a final vote on February 23. As a nearby resident, I have concerns about the scale and compatibility of this project within the surrounding neighborhood. At nearly 80 feet tall, the proposed building would sit adjacent to multi-family housing, St. Philip the Apostle Church, the Hill Avenue Branch Library, and a K-8 school. I support responsible growth and innovation in Pasadena.
However, I believe this project raises significant questions that deserve careful consideration: Whether the height and massing are appropriate for this residential-adjacent parcel The potential impact on traffic congestion at Hill & Del Mar (particularly during rush hour when it is already congested) The need for greater transparency regarding the specific research activities and materials handling planned for the facility Zoning boundaries exist to protect neighborhood stability and provide predictability. How this project is evaluated will set an important precedent for future commercial developments near residential areas and schools throughout Pasadena. I respectfully urge the City Council to ensure that this project is fully vetted for compatibility, safety, and long-term neighborhood impact before approving it. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Stephen Marsh
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 11:06 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [4] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation, economic growth, and research and development. At the same time, churches play a vital role in our city as places of worship, reflection, education, and service. These missions depend on safe, accessible, and appropriately scaled surroundings that respect sensitive uses and neighborhood character. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the currently proposed scale. Proceeding without a full environmental review-and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street—raises serious concerns for parishioners, including traffic safety, noise, air quality, and overall compatibility with church activities. Requiring the project to return in a redesigned form that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's maximum height of approximately 51 feet and that undergoes a thorough environmental analysis would better align the development with the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive institutions. This approach would help preserve community trust while still supporting Pasadena's broader innovation goals. Approving the project as proposed would set a troubling precedent for placing intensified R&D uses adjacent to churches and other sensitive community institutions in areas not clearly intended for such development under Pasadena's planning framework. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to move forward only in a form that reflects both economic ambition and respect for our church community and shared values.
Sincerely,
Patricia Thiel
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 12:49 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Thoughtful Planning Matters - 1364 East Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Thoughtful Planning Matters - 1364 East Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing to express my concern that the proposed development does not reflect the kind of thoughtful planning our city strives for. While the lot may currently be vacant, that alone does not determine what is appropriate for the site. Over time, this neighborhood has developed in a way that feels balanced - with multi-family residences, a historic library, and St. Philip the Apostle Church creating a cohesive and established setting. Good planning considers context, scale, and compatibility. It asks not only what can be built, but what should be built in relation to what already exists. A project of this size introduces a level of intensity that seems inconsistent with the character and capacity of the surrounding area.
Decisions like this shape neighborhoods for decades. I respectfully ask that you ensure any development here reflects careful consideration of context and long-term community impact. Sincerely, Lori Lee Sincerely,
Lori Lee
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 12:30 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: General Plan Land Use Elements; Traffic Congestion; Child Impact [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: General Plan Land Use Elements; Traffic Congestion; Child Impact Mr. Mark Jomsky,
As you consider the proposed development at 1364 East Green Street, I respectfully ask that you evaluate this project according to the foundational Pasadena General Plan Land Use Elements, specifically Land Use Elements #5, #4, and #2. *Pasadena committed to development of commercial, non-residential areas, close to transportation lines. To this voter, the proposed complex does not fit that commitment. Please consider Elements # 4 and # 2. *I often use the intersection of Green & Hill, and Green & Cordova. This is a heavily trafficked area. The last thing this area needs is additional traffic as would be thrust on the neighborhood by the proposed project. People have a tendency to not signal, drive aggressively, and rush here. A Pasadena City College entrance further complicates this area. See Land Use Element # 5, below. *I wonder what the impact of the proposed development will be on the many children who attend school, obtain services, and participate in church services on that block.
What are the safety, educational, and environmental impacts of the construction and traffic changes on children? Many elderly adults already drive and walk in this area as well. Please see Land Use Elements #4 and # 5. *And... what sort of work will go on in the building, specifically? With what? Using what? "Biotechnology" is too broad a term for local citizens to be able to guess what activities will occur, and what substances, utility uses, and resources will be impacting their neighborhood. Many thanks for your thoughtful consideration.
Sincerely,
Theresa Mazich
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 2:55 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Serious Safety Concerns Regarding Development Near St. Philip the Apostle School [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Serious Safety Concerns Regarding Development Near St. Philip the Apostle School Mr. Mark Jomsky,
How is it possible that a large construction project and proposed R&D facility at 1364 E. Green Street could move forward directly adjacent to an active elementary school and church without clear and public assurances that children's safety has been fully protected? I am a parent of a child at St. Philip the Apostle School, writing to express serious concern about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street. The prospect of prolonged construction next to the school, increased and unsafe traffic on Green Street, and an R&D building with unclear research uses raises fundamental questions about oversight, planning, and public safety. Parents rely on the City to act with heightened care when projects affect schools and places of worship. It is troubling that a development of this scale and intensity appears to have progressed so far, given its proximity to children and a residential neighborhood. At a minimum, families deserve transparency about what activities will take place on this site and how risks will be mitigated. I respect the City Council's service and acknowledge Caltech's importance to Pasadena.
However, respect for institutions must never outweigh the responsibility to protect children. I urge the Council to pause this project, require a thorough and meaningful safety and environmental review, and reconsider whether this location is appropriate for high-intensity R&D use. I ask that your decisions reflect sound judgment, accountability, and a clear commitment to the well-being of families who depend on you to safeguard their community. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Andrew Boaz
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 4:13 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: 1364 E. Green Street: Respect the Established Character of Our Neighborhood [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: 1364 E. Green Street: Respect the Established Character of Our Neighborhood Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident of the Caltech area who appreciates the established character and stability of this neighborhood. Over time, this area has developed around multi-family residences, a historic library, and St. Philip the Apostle Church in a way that feels cohesive and appropriately scaled. That continuity is important to many of us who live nearby. The proposed project at 1364 E. Green St. represents a significant change in intensity. In addition to concerns about scale, 1 am unclear why a development of this size — and the traffic it would generate — is being introduced into an area that has historically functioned at a more moderate pace. Increased vehicle trips and congestion would affect daily life, safety, and overall livability. This project is both unwelcome and out of place in this neighborhood. A commercial development of this size with greatly increased congestion and traffic is totally unacceptable, unnecessary and inappropriate at this location. A primary consideration is the increase in traffic that would result. Traffic in this area is already very heavy in the morning and evening. I personally have seen three very serious traffic accidents near this location and fear that a massive building with hundreds of parking places would inevitably exponentially increase both traffic congestion and vehicle collisions. Although growth is part of a healthy city, it should be prudently managed so that it preserves and protects the character and capacity of the surrounding neighborhood. In other words, new projects should be good neighbors and this behemoth building certainly does not qualify as a good neighbor. I respectfully ask that you reconsider the current proposal and require a design that better reflects the established context of this area. Sincerely, Janice Corsino Pasadena Sincerely,
Janice Corsino
Pasadena, CA 91106 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 7:08 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Preserving What Makes Pasadena Pasadena- 1364 East Green Street Opposition [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content Is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Preserving What Makes Pasadena Pasadena- 1364 East Green Street Opposition Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a CA resident who cares deeply about our city and the qualities that make Pasadena unique. Our tree-lined streets, historic neighborhoods, human-scale buildings, and thoughtful planning traditions are not accidental — they are the result of decades of careful stewardship. Growth is part of any thriving city, and innovation has long been part of Pasadena's identity. But growth must respect the character, scale, and livability of our neighborhoods. Increasingly, new developments feel oversized and out of proportion to their surroundings. When buildings loom over adjacent homes or dramatically alter the rhythm of a street, it chips away at the very character that draws people here. Preserving what makes Pasadena special does not mean rejecting change. It means ensuring that change enhances our community rather than overwhelms it. It means respecting established neighborhoods, protecting transitions between residential and commercial areas, and maintaining the human scale that defines our city. Just as important, it means restoring public confidence in the planning process. Residents need to know that long-standing standards matter, that community input is taken seriously, and that decisions are guided by clear principles — not simply by what can be built to the maximum limit. Pasadena's strength has always been its balance: innovation alongside tradition, progress alongside preservation. I urge you to uphold that balance and ensure future development protects the character, charm, and livability that truly make Pasadena, Pasadena.
Sincerely,
Lauren Moniz
Hawthorne, CA 90250 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 9:30 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Respect Community Input for 1364 E Green St
[1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: Respect Community Input for 1364 E Green St
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
Please do not allow the 1364 E. Green Street project to proceed in its current form, and grant the appeal.
I support development, innovation, and Pasadena's role as a center for research and life sciences. At the same time, the East Colorado Specific Plan was developed through extensive public engagement, with hundreds of residents participating in person and thousands more providing input online. That process was intended to meaningfully guide where and how growth should occur. This project moved forward without a full environmental review and at a scale that exceeds what was envisioned for this location.
Setting aside the ECSP's guidance here, especially for a project next to a school, a church, and homes, risks undermining the community vision that informed the plan. Approving the project in its current form would set a precedent for enhanced R&D development in locations not clearly intended under adopted plans. Granting the appeal would allow the City to honor its planning process while refining the project to better align with community expectations.
Sincerely,
Frank Duerr
South Pasadena, CA 91031 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 9:44 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces - St. Philip the Apostle [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Safeguarding Sacred Spaces - St. Philip the Apostle Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a resident who is concerned about development proposals, such as the 1364 E. Green Street project, that place large, high-intensity projects directly beside schools and churches. I am concerned about the proposed building exceeding the 51-foot neighborhood height limit. I am concerned about the lack of environmental reviews. What will the impacts be on traffic and congestion, especially with the nearby school and pedestrian safety? Growth is important, but it must be balanced with respect for community institutions. Pasadena has long taken pride in thoughtful planning that protects historic buildings and sensitive uses. That tradition should continue by ensuring projects adjacent to churches undergo the highest level of environmental scrutiny and are scaled appropriately to their surroundings.
Construction noise, heavy truck traffic, vibration, and long-term operational impacts can disrupt services and diminish the peaceful environment these spaces require. I respectfully urge the Council to prioritize the protection of our churches and ensure that development decisions reflect the care these institutions deserve.
Sincerely,
Lillian Sun
Pasadena, CA 91101 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 3:49 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street [ i] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns About 1364 E. Green Street
Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a Catholic parishioner concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place where we gather for worship, receive the sacraments, and serve others. These ministries depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of sensitive uses. As Catholics, we are called to uphold human dignity, care for our neighbors, and act as good stewards of our community. While I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation and institutions like Caltech, this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this street, raises real concerns for parishioners—especially families, children, and elderly members of our community. I respectfully urge the City Council to require that this project comply with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergo a thorough environmental review. Doing so would better reflect both Pasadena's planning goals and respect for faith communities. Please grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors stewardship, safety, and the vital role our church plays in the neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Andrew Sanders
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 8:05 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [ L] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation, economic growth, and research and development. At the same time, churches play a vital role in our city as places of worship, reflection, education, and service. These missions depend on safe, accessible, and appropriately scaled surroundings that respect sensitive uses and neighborhood character. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the currently proposed scale. Proceeding without a full environmental review—and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street—raises serious concerns for parishioners, including traffic safety, noise, air quality, and overall compatibility with church activities. Requiring the project to return in a redesigned form that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's maximum height of approximately 51 feet and that undergoes a thorough environmental analysis would better align the development with the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive institutions. This approach would help preserve community trust while still supporting Pasadena's broader innovation goals. Approving the project as proposed would set a troubling precedent for placing intensified R&D uses adjacent to churches and other sensitive community institutions in areas not clearly intended for such development under Pasadena's planning framework. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to move forward only in a form that reflects both economic ambition and respect for our church community and shared values.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Sanders
Pasadena, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 8:18 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Brad Staff
Pasadena, CA 91105 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 8:37 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protect Pasadena's Neighborhoods: Caltech's Project at 1364 E. Green Street [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protect Pasadena's Neighborhoods: Caltech's Project at 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a resident of Duarte and a volunteer on the Bereavement Ministry Team at St Philip The Apostle Catholic Parish. As with my own community, I value Pasadena's strong neighborhoods and support thoughtful development. Innovation and growth are important, but they must not come at the expense of the residential communities that make Pasadena such a special place to live and worship in. I am concerned that the proposed R&D project at 1364 E. Green St. has not been adequately demonstrated to be safe, given its location next to the St Philip grade school and Parish. The environmental review does not appear to sufficiently address potential health, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts on the surrounding homes and sensitive uses. Our neighborhoods should not bear uncertain risks from projects of this scale and intensity. I respectfully ask the City Council to reverse the Design Commission's approval and require a comprehensive environmental analysis before allowing this project to proceed. Protecting neighborhood livability requires careful, transparent decision-making grounded in complete and reliable information. I urge you to visit the Building a Better Pasadena website https://www.abetterpasadena.org/ and view the scale rendering of this massive project. Then ask yourself, does this giant structure really fit into this neighborhood? Imagine what precedent approval of this project sets for all of Pasadena, giant buildings in peaceful neighborhoods. Reasonable compromises are possible. A project limited to 51 feet in height, supported by a satisfactory environmental review demonstrating it can operate safely in this location, would be more consistent with the scale and character of the surrounding area. More broadly, ! urge the Council to revisit the November 2023 General Plan modification that allowed R&D facilities citywide. Facilities with increased height allowances should be directed to established commercial corridors, such as Fair Oaks, Colorado, and Lake areas designed for higher-intensity development— rather than placed adjacent to residential streets. Pasadena has long been known for careful planning that protects neighborhood character while allowing appropriate growth. I ask that you uphold those principles now by ensuring that development strengthens, rather than undermines, residents' reliance on everyday life. Thank you for your attention and service to our community.
Sincerely,
LARRY MARQUETTE
Duarte, CA 91010 Constituent
McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 8:39 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [ L] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the Re: A Catholic Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I write as a Catholic parishioner with deep concern for the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. Our parish is a sacred place. It is where we gather to worship God, receive the sacraments, educate our children in faith, care for the poor, and offer refuge to those seeking peace and healing. The Church's mission depends not only on what happens inside our walls, but also on the surrounding environment that is safe, calm, and respectful of this sacred purpose. The Catholic tradition teaches us to value human dignity, stewardship of creation, and care for the most vulnerable among us. For these reasons, I am troubled that this project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the scale currently proposed. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street, risks disrupting the life of our parish and undermining the sense of safety and reverence that parishioners depend upon.
Traffic congestion, noise, air quality, and safety concerns are not theoretical. They affect families arriving for Mass, children attending religious education, elderly parishioners with limited mobility, and those who come to our church seeking prayer, counseling, or quiet refuge. A redesigned project that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes a thorough environmental review would better reflect the values of care, balance, and responsibility that Pasadena claims to uphold. Approving this project as proposed would set a troubling precedent—suggesting that churches and other sensitive institutions may be asked to bear the burdens of growth without adequate protection or consideration. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that honors both economic progress and the spiritual and communal life of our city. Pasadena can grow in a way that respects faith communities, protects human dignity, and reflects true stewardship. I ask that you choose that path.
Sincerely,
Carlos Bonilla
Alhambra, CA 91801 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 11:59 AM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Protecting Pasadena's Schools, Churches, and Planning Traditions- 1364 East Green [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Protecting Pasadena's Schools, Churches, and Planning Traditions - 1364 East Green Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a Pasadena resident who values our city's long tradition of thoughtful planning, strong neighborhoods, and respect for community institutions. Pasadena has always balanced innovation with care — protecting its schools, churches, and residential areas while allowing appropriate growth. I am writing because I believe that balance is at risk. I am deeply concerned about the proposed R&D project near Green Street, given its location next to a grade school, an active church, and established homes.
Schools and churches are among the most sensitive and important places in our community. Students should be able to learn without unnecessary risk, and parishioners should be able to worship and gather in peace and safety. The current environmental review does not appear to fully address potential health, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts on these sensitive uses. Pasadena has long been known for careful zoning and planning standards that protect vulnerable institutions and preserve community character.
Recent broad amendments that allow R&D facilities citywide, particularly those with increased height allowances, raise serious concerns when applied directly adjacent to schools and churches. Higher- intensity uses should be concentrated along established commercial corridors such as Fair Oaks, Colorado, and Lake — not placed immediately beside places of worship, education, and family life. I respectfully ask the City Council to reverse the Design Commission's approval and require a comprehensive environmental review before this project proceeds. Decisions affecting schools and churches deserve the highest level of scrutiny and transparency. Pasadena's tradition of responsible planning is one of its greatest strengths. I urge you to uphold that tradition by ensuring that growth never compromises the safety of our students, the sanctity of our churches, or the trust residents place in their city government. Thank you for your service and your careful consideration.
Sincerely,
DIANA VALER
- -
PASADENA, CA 91104 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 12:58 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [ 1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Parishioner's Appeal Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
1 am writing as a parishioner who loves this church and is deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and what it could mean for our faith community. Our church is more than a building. It is a place of worship, reflection, healing, and service. It is where families gather, children learn, seniors find community, and people seek peace. These sacred purposes depend on a surrounding environment that is safe, accessible, and respectful of sensitive uses. I support Pasadena's vision for innovation and economic growth, and I value the contributions of institutions like Caltech. But growth should never come at the expense of the places that anchor our community. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location, nor that it is appropriately scaled for a street shared with a church. Approving it without a full environmental review, and at a height beyond what was envisioned for this area, puts parishioners and our mission at risk. Traffic, noise, air quality, and safety are not abstract concerns for us. They affect how people arrive for worship, how children and elders move through the neighborhood, and how our church serves the broader community. A redesigned project that respects the East Colorado Specific Plan's 51-foot height limit and undergoes thorough environmental review would show care for both innovation and the people who live, worship, and serve here. Approving this project as proposed would send a painful message-that churches and other sensitive institutions can be treated as afterthoughts in Pasadena's growth. I urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to return in a form that reflects not only economic ambition, but compassion, stewardship, and respect for our shared community values.
Sincerely,
Cris Bonzon
Alhambra, CA 91802 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 1:01 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street [1] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: Parishioner Concerns Regarding 1364 E. Green Street Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am writing as a parishioner deeply concerned about the proposed development at 1364 E. Green Street and its potential impact on our church community. I support Pasadena's commitment to innovation, economic growth, and research and development. At the same time, churches play a vital role in our city as places of worship, reflection, education, and service. These missions depend on safe, accessible, and appropriately scaled surroundings that respect sensitive uses and neighborhood character. The proposed project has not demonstrated that it can operate safely at this location or at the currently proposed scale. Proceeding without a full environmental review—and at a height exceeding what was envisioned for this street—raises serious concerns for parishioners, including traffic safety, noise, air quality, and overall compatibility with church activities. Requiring the project to return in a redesigned form that complies with the East Colorado Specific Plan's maximum height of approximately 51 feet and that undergoes a thorough environmental analysis would better align the development with the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive institutions. This approach would help preserve community trust while still supporting Pasadena's broader innovation goals. Approving the project as proposed would set a troubling precedent for placing intensified R&D uses adjacent to churches and other sensitive community institutions in areas not clearly intended for such development under Pasadena's planning framework. I respectfully urge you to grant the appeal and allow this project to move forward only in a form that reflects both economic ambition and respect for our church community and shared values. Please consider the needs of our neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Alicia Aguilar
pasadena, CA 91107 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected] 1 McMillan, Acquanette (Netta)
From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2026 1:45 PM
To: PublicComment-AutoResponse
Subject: A Call for Safe and Transparent Planning (1364 E. Green Street) [A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
Re: A Call for Safe and Transparent Planning (1364 E. Green Street) Mr. Mark Jomsky,
I am a California resident who supports thoughtful development, world-class innovation, and the important role institutions like Caltech play in our beautiful city. At the same time, we believe development must be safe, transparent, and compatible with the neighborhoods in which it is proposed.
I am concerned that the proposed R&D project at 1364 E. Green Street has not been adequately demonstrated to be safe, given its location next to a grade school, an active church, and established residential neighborhoods. In particular, we believe the environmental review has not sufficiently addressed potential health, traffic, and quality-of-life impacts on these sensitive uses. I respectfully ask the City Council to reverse the Design Commission's approval and require a proper and comprehensive environmental analysis before the project proceeds. This step is essential to ensuring that decisions are based on sound information and that community impacts are fully understood and appropriately addressed. I also believe reasonable compromises are possible. Community representatives have indicated a willingness to support a project limited to 51 feet in height, provided it is accompanied by a satisfactory environmental review demonstrating that it can operate safely in this location. More broadly, we urge the City Council to revisit its November 2023 General Plan modification that allows R&D facilities citywide. R&D facilities with increased height allowances should be concentrated along established commercial corridors such as Fair Oaks, Colorado, and Lake—not on streets directly adjacent to residential neighborhoods, including Green Street. Finally, I am concerned that recent broad amendments to the R&D code were adopted without sufficient consideration of their potential impact on nearby schools, churches, homes, and families. If this can occur on Holliston, it could happen elsewhere. These changes risk introducing health, traffic, and other hazards into areas that were previously protected by longstanding zoning and planning standards. We ask the City Council to take action to ensure responsible development, protect neighborhood livability, and restore public confidence in the planning process.
Sincerely,
Agnelo A Fernandes
Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Constituent
Prepared by OneClickPolitics (tm) at www.oneclickpolitics.com. OneClickPolitics provides online communications tools for supporters of a cause, issue, organization or association to contact their elected officials. For more information regarding our policies and services, please contact [email protected]