AR 1 ATTACHMENT A — Pasadena City Council, March 23, 2026

Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
September 8, 2022
Donson Liu, City of Pasadena
EJCT2^^^Bi Joaquin Siques, City of Pasadena
QEIS^^^^^BI Todd Tregenza, GHD
Tony Jusay, GHD
EIE^^^^B Draft Transitional Project Development Summary 916-245-4216
Project no12575776

1.Project Summary
Introduction
After years of considering additional freeway alignments for the northern extent of State Route (SR) 710, through collaboration with Caltrans, the time has arrived to shift from planning freeway-to-freeway concepts toplanning freeway-to-local street connections. Steps to relinquish the roadways within Caltrans right-of-way to the City of Pasadena (City) highlight an important milestone. The 710 Northern Stub Transitional Project Development provides near term multimodal improvements that can be implemented quickly to enhance safe north/south and east/west mobility, particularly for non-motorized users, along the Pasadena Avenue and St John Avenue corridors.

Purpose and Need
The purpose of the 710 Northern Stub Transitional Project Development is to identify implementable near-term transportation projects as an interim step prior to the long-term planning the City must undertake to create a lasting community driven vision for the northern stub of 710. The limits of the project area and proposed improvements extend from Walnut Street to the north to Columbia Street to the south. Pasadena Avenue and St John Avenue are the main roadways that run north to south, as well as east-west overcrossings and streets, including Union Street, Colorado Boulevard, Green Street, Del Mar Boulevard, California Boulevard, and others. The overall project corridor distance is approximately 1.8 miles. Additionally, intersections along Colorado Boulevard at the San Rafael Avenue/SR 134 on/off ramps and Orange Grove Boulevard are also included in the list of improvement recommendations. Key parameters for developing these concepts include the premise that near-term projects shall not preclude future changes to land use, roadway networks, or other community development concepts that could be considered as part of future long-term planning effort.

To implement project improvements, the City is seeking Measure R Mobility Improvement Project (MIP) funding programmed by LA Metro. These proposed improvements align with newly adopted Metro Objectives for Multimodal Highway Investments that help to realize more holistic, multimodal, and equitable outcomes. It is also noted that concepts developed as part of this effort do not include roadway reconfigurations that would reduce the number of "through" travel lanes along the corridor.

Project Site Visits
The project team performed multiple study area site visits, observing and documenting existing physical corridor conditions, noting, for example, deficiencies in accessibility and opportunities for enhancements. The project team also observed traffic conditions, including travel speeds, vehicle queues, and driver behavior. An existing conditions analysis was not performed as part of this project, however. The project team reviewed and referenced the recently completed SR 710 N Stub Repurposing Technical Feasibility Assessment as a source of quantified vehicular operations. The following are a sample of existing corridor conditions observed in the field during the project team's site visits on April 5, 2022,and May 23,2022. 1 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
Photo 1 Uneven sidewalk, shown here on
Bellefontaine, should be reconstructed to
improve accessibility
^ st
s-r
!',2!S! n < ^^'.-.•»:.&
•'" s.m s•^SI--
im
i---;-» w-
r
<a '-••: ,*.<-
'm ^
«•••
^i y m -4
;W<»iid^.,'A;-•A-l:-.»
Photo 2Asphalt sidewalk, shown here on St. John
Avenue, provides uneven walking surface.

Utilities obstruct path of travel.
<3"-tt
^
1 y
w
(••fr;
V
."^'Si I
M
f-c\
dl'
i
^'^'^•"1 ^
.^^ :..

Photo 4 Guardrail used to block side street access
contribute to a "highway" aesthetic and
conflict with sense of liveable City street.
1^~ms
»A^..' ~^-- 'y^w s?%S^-J>'<?•A:\
&
*->r'
3^^ S0t:»t
&*•
r
•IMM&J KSSiaS
.-(
^
Photo 5 High vehicle speeds on St. John Avenue,
sotf(h of the SR 710 off ramp, challenge
movement between parking and parks.
%f.<^ m^^-i^t-f^^ ^^@^'-- "^
<
^^^
^.: '••'•^t; <.'^..
&,^.^
« 1
x
^ ^%
A^"•;,'*-
Photo 3 Caltrans signage extends into path of
travel along asphalt sidewalk, shown here
on Pasadena Avenue.

Photo 6
%v
s
^
^
*1 j»
1 w ?"
»» .»,
^
•X
Bfr
iu
i""-s
i£
--to
At Colorado Boulevard near the SR 134
WB ramps at San Rafael Avenue, sidewalk
/s obstructed by guardrail and utilities.
/•
<-!s «.
h^ (fe'?WL--<
^JF.^5
.-
^- . --V (
^,j.^^-^" '
v
^
;•<•
L.-S
^-s^;
w
2 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary

2.Community Engagement
Targeted Outreach
The project development team conducted targeted outreach and presented the project including background, objectives, and a menu of treatments to eight (8) stakeholder groups to learn about any concerns, insights, and perspectives. One in-person meeting and seven (7) virtual meetings were held. Additionally, City staff from Department of Transportation (DOT) conducted a one-on-one meeting with a project area adjacent school. The stakeholders included meetings with group organizations and dates listed in Table 1 below:

Table 1: Completed Stakeholder Meetings
StakeholderMeeting Date
Arlington Garden
Sequoyah School
5-23-22
5-24-22
The Waverly School5-25-22
710 Ad Hoc Committee5-26-22
Westridge Schools
Maranatha High School
West Pasadena Residents Association (WPRA)
Huntington Hospital
5-27-22
6-1-22
6-1-22
6-2-22
Key themes identified from targeted outreach meetings include:
•Safety - safe crossing for pedestrians at intersections and concern with improved street lighting (road safety)
Traffic and roadway - Concerned with safety and vehicle speeds on Pasadena Ave advocated for walkable streets
• Biking and walking - Support for bikeway and pedestrian improvements Streetscape - Support for green street features including permeable hardscape and appropriate trees Access/ Connectivity - Support for crossings to access destinations including parks and schools Transit Connectivity - support for bus lanes and potential sen/ice options Open House
An in-person open house meeting was held on Tuesday, August 9, 2022, between the hours of6:OOPM to

7.-30PM. The meeting was in a public area at the front entrance of Westridge School at 324, Madeline Drive.

The City mailed approximately 2600 notices, as well as sent emails to residents along the corridor two weeks in advance of the event. An estimated 75 to 100 people attended the meeting. Six (6) poster boards were on display including the Project Overview, Project Area, Upper Roadway Improvements, Lower Roadway Improvements, Areawide Improvement Options, and Potential Transit Route Options. Project fact sheets in both English and Spanish were made available. A QR code link to the Online Project Survey was also provided allowing additional options to take in feedback.

Project team staff provided background information, answered questions on various project concepts, and encouraged attendees to leave comments on 'post-it' notes. 3 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
Photo 7 Community members attending August 9,
2022, Open House meeting.Photo 8 Attendees and project team staff discussing potential project concepts.
•••••"» .tK
m'^
••: £5,1
m^
Sj,:
,.
tM
f^
's
^ ^.
»?^ "^
-^
»
»E'
^ ^
ff •^
^,^'9i ^^.•...»'^
<»'•%
fV
<>.•
^ ^
^ ^
X
\^
i ^^f..A
A total offorty-eight 'post-it' comments were placed on poster boards. Comments highlighted interest in bikeway and pedestrian improvements, traffic signal/lights, traffic calming, roadway, transit, wayfinding, and development. Below is a list of comment topics that identifies the number of times the topic was noted.

Bikeways;15 • Roadway; 3
Pedestrian; 12 • Transit; 2
Traffic Signal/Lights; 7 • Development; 2
Traffic Calming; 5 • Wayfinding; 2
Trees/ Greening; 4 • Enforcement; 1
The detailed summary of comment responses captured from the August 9, Open hlouse Meeting and Online Project Survey are included in Appendix A.

3.Improvement Recommendations
The main roadway network for the 710 North Stub Transitional Project Development includes Walnut Street Pasadena Avenue, St John Avenue, California Boulevard, Columbia, etc. and the existing freeway overcrossing roadways including Union Street, Colorado Blvd, Green Street and Del Mar Blvd. Additionally, intersections along Colorado Boulevard at the SR134 on/off ramps and Orange Grove Boulevard are included.

Listed below indicate the streets, limits and intersection locations.

Columbia Street from Orange Grove Boulevard to Fair Oaks Avenue • Pasadena Avenue from Walnut Street to Columbia Street St John Avenue from Walnut Street to California Boulevard Orange Grove Blvd and Colorado Blvd Intersection
San Rafael Ave at Colorado Blvd Intersection
This section also describes treatments and elements to apply globally to the project list development • Signal timing optimization and upgrades
Leading pedestrian intervals, adequate timing
Bicycle improvements
• Bulb-outs/curb extension
•Directional curb ramps
High - visibility crosswalks
Sidewalk improvements
Lighting
4 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary

3.1Street Improvement Concepts
The concepts presented in this memorandum were prepared using the Remix Streets platform by Via in an effort to illustrate design intent. These planning level illustrative concepts will be further refined as project development progresses, and rendered at increased levels of detail in scaled CAD drawings to improve the level of confidence in improvement constructability, consistency with design standards, and accuracy of design and construction cost estimates.

Design Basis
The basis for concept design includes the City's Standard Plan Drawings and City's Street Design Guidelines.

Additional guidance for design considerations that are not specifically included in the City's local design guidance comes from both Caltrans' Highway Design Manual, Design Information Bulletins, and the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO).

PASADENA STREET DESICN GUIDE
flGUBl 3-2 CDOSS StGTION IINEIISIONS HIB CUINiCTBB-Cin STBIHS hKBW: 8NN«W-ra»—u^aine
Thrwnili/lan
Turn lan*
NttlftUir
Oladnund-
lictd*
lan"
tecws I Jlnatfu/
1MB | »>l«N~
hrtdw
law
nNUwam I nrtnwuu
lrl»nC«mm»nt*l
IrinuirtMwBal
w
w
IT
IT
1-S
1-S
IS
M'
frr
frT
r
ff
r
r
IS'.W
w-w
SfrtfCwiunwdrt
Biw-U—lrtw
w
w
w
n
IT
7-r
7-r
».r
IS
1S
»Ji-
»-7
9-T
t-7
s'
5-
s'
i/a
N/«
1/»
s-n
r-o-
r-ff
tutsW« lam relBrs 10 a Baisl lane lliat Is aillacent u tlin curtl n« »itsW« lan mai «xce«d n «ti«ie simn cniwiinii tl«iin»h»l or nlier taomnirtc ctiaracnrlsBRi in Bnsmi"Ttia T tiic»ct8 lane JncluifBs a 2' liufferon one site ttw S litaltln ]an« incluiles a 2' bufto an b»lti siiln. "Bn Ciiiaiclai cn streetE In an urtan conlext tlw »m6ntn I Curt ;on« linn Ulieli be nriseu ms raaiie iwiiawa»6 itaiinr strh or a r transnslitNet. Nora sulurtaii CTmms«»»iml»Kiw a 3' tneniu.' CiiraMna lar wnital «l«ments sueli »s strft IIIBIB iltlisrit Is a [lartliia lane Brasant Organization of Transitional Concept Development Summary Areawide Improvement Recommendations
The first subsequent section describes global, areawide improvement recommendations proposed for application within the entire study area, and/or along several segments of the study corridors. These include consideration of new traffic signal hardware and communications technology, intersection curb extensions, sidewalks, crosswalks, ADA enhancements, bikeway improvements, landscaping, undergrounded utilities and street and pedestrian scale lighting.

Corridor Improvement Recommendations
Following description of the areawide improvements, an illustrative map of each study corridor is presented alongside callouts to specific cross sections, a narrative description of the improvement intent, and a summary of high-level preliminary construction cost estimates. A review of existing mobility or traffic safety concerns is provided for each segment Some corridors feature multiple pages to illustrate a variety of design concepts. A key map is presented to orient the reader to the segment's context within the study area. 5 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary Areawide Improvement Recommendations
Photo 9 Curb extensions reduce crossing distance
and help pedestrians and drivers see each
other better.

Photo 12Locating and organizing traffic signal and
communication hardware out of sidewalk
areas minimize obstructions to users.
^
iB
^
F
£»
•s,
^«»"
y-^K.
^1m
-y«s
Photo 10 ADA warning devices alert users where to
access sidewalks and high visibility
crosswa/ks improve intersection visibility.
"^
^
^^<>»;
Photo 13
\
Undergrounding utilities improve sidewalk
clearances and help reduce hazards during
weather related power outages.
.^' ^^-,k
•vi»y.
^
»
.i
Photo 11 New sidewalks are proposed to replace
worn, asphalt and/or missing sidewalks
and meet ADA standards.
t.
^
<h
^.^^
? ^
•^~.

Photo 14 Street and pedestrian level lighting serve
roadway users and increase visibility and
safety for people walking.
^t$§ 1>
n«?
s
I
\
'<
\ -A.*
^
•:i.
^
^<jf.
s
^A
^^^-^ •it.
y
^^»r^.y^^.-!*
-*»•
'%
atti
6 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary Areawide Improvement Recommendations
Photo 15 Landscaping including drought tolerant
vegitation help reduce water use and
improve street aesthetics,
»,IN"%'^?
•t.»M»»aL -w
IS"
?..
t
Photo 16 Raised speed tables are traffic calming
devices that can also be used at crossings
(o increase pedestrian safety.
vyst
SS
^:
s'
f
^^
^«<
II
ffl
irf^ sa^( w^
\
» •w
»!)
Photo 17 Class II, bike lanes provide a dedicated
space for cyclists and can be enhanced
with color at conflict areas.
^
I
w
^
mmm-f^
Photo 18 A Class IV, two-way grade separated
bikeway offers high safety benefits between motorists and people walking and hiking.
,*> •K
^
1 '^,
^a^^
•*
fe>..

Photo 19A Class IV, two-way at-grade bikeway uses
space within the roadway with barrier
devices for separation between vehicles.
g?
^^w
y*-"
Photo 20A Class IV, one-way bikeway next to
parking provides a dedicated lane and
separation between motorists.

Vf'^w-•%K3KiSS®g
a
^
7 »> rfc ~—W^"^ .^."-^.

JpiBgU®!—',
£'
m
E
E
3 (0
d)
I
I
&
I
d>
•r
a.
"n
I
u>
c
2 I-
t:

I
•s
QI
0 <
?
®
E
£
u
I
1^-
°.'
I . 3!s< ^ i
Ji^ a5 Fair 0»«i Av
•7:f.fa <?" s
II r
^
S s I
» iu
•w AwP»»dw
^T©
^^>S St John•s 6
hs °
ii I £s j@ s
Oraft9» G<<w" 81nKls
*A
J?j
@FI •ui'
^
•5 f£ (
;:;.-0
6 s2-c=
*rTO
>, '<.'0)'0
1^.^
TO
p? -£^(U /~«^^T3 3
s- 0
5 1
ros
*(D
U)ro s ^&< 0)
?,'
tO
Raaiaecifi0)^ ^JS i=
£^ 3£(U
^ ^ (D
€11^
>^J3 ffl£-5 ^ sU3
50£ -0^~m t(U^ >,
9c in(C •s Q rt
CMs •^
tt
<u01 <" 5
^ c0 .5 f
-0
-sT3
s-s
11 ( "<(0<
iw&.EE0
I
(D 0)
t
x2 sa (0 -a
02?3 c® Sv -5 2Q.^ ro
?1 Q.0) ro-0
ro 2 ~mJ"£.-u w••£ro
a<^ ^
Q.T3T3
£(D 01(Uc
a .•"2Mro
^s-0
^ a? <®.o -a0
€§^1•^^ -0
•»
|3^v r*
0 ''§ ^^ m
11^1:a ro s
s" c0
\ss" s
^ -e-cuW I: Iro -= >,u^ s
sjs.££.-§
1i£
y
y=T3
s-0
11 IIC 
(0 S) <u2-TO s£JOJO
(U
a
v-a.£.-^^ » sy <
1111£ = "0 ."W
'? i^ro
£;s
."'.I a.tO
•^*?£ ~m^ d) m^ ss£^ «r*oro i«•s5 ."2 '0s ,§ -^ ^|jl|
IIIIMi!
•w -I ^ ^.X P t0 C
Uj 0 >£JS
s ^ s t:sro
i-Q s A
I IN
^3SE Iss 0
IllIIS
cCi^ 8
^a a: Q
sca. =)
a>
•nt.
•=-
I!
s—»fcif Nt <;
•a^s i 1MB
?il;»^. ^^(U
^.i <ic y. J0 ® 4's'w..ily>
•£^.0
I.*-(5 E MS ^ • "•w .y
I
•t.£
(D
-0E
c0 (0 ©s'(U
<u0)
c,3
." ^c
.'•^<u~m
"-' ::1
B^fc^
> t
U) <0 ;.0 (
r:
•G 03Q. =2;
^1
c2 !..<-d) 0)
?i" i
a. -0 r-£ S? co w r
% cteU)
ro /N I Y.a.
^y^tes -t-a
c:03
5ia? V.!£ M:wS0 »<
f^?"^ fie^ic0) •i.:l Qsssss^
roa-
3 0 c.
(U
£ ^ £
"M
in 0 =!
^

1.1i
Ill^:11^ II
lii
> ~"b >
E "?
ill
co JO
0) 0 -Q
OT
li5
Illtil
0 0
.y 2Ul <uro a. -sa. l-00) 2) •;
£c 6i s
w•c=i 30
I
T3 ro03
^•5-a
:.?*
EE§.^3
•o•ou 0>
m(U c0£
iiii
s ^0-^(D
Q.-o£^
0t>< c2J3
^Q :<
c:^-a
^;?s < "a» •»£ ,':(U asm -.3.0ro
s"ro su g &Q. t£ -0w^ 7, 5
s-si
cc
Q. 0ro ?0^wu.
11^1
»
(/) 0)0)(U \3=d)
Q-2^ 2
.£u
0c:
£-
^111
.i20 .~^^-
£ 's• •%I t
I <
. ns ^-F-fif O-Ki Avns
3 a a » ^
Is If
i
i t s
(>a«.>4w4 Ac *5i
I
•s S St John AvO
t £ tI I ;!t3 ",'I 1 ^^I
s0'Tf^n ^iw9 8tvd
;;'2
£i
0)
Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary Pasadena Avenue (Columbia Street to Belief ontaine Street) m1^
»
S'ii'&iasSisSi
f
•'y^.y'd ^^ ^ea-sa'
i¥ «•R"-'.';:, ^L €y-^R a
4«r
g"•s
^«•
—
(i
<L tfM
r
y^^ ^
^«••
•'*
*A'.
^ »•
u ^
^e-^it:^-
iit
•J"
4 iasafceSf
(s
^111
^
0 *N^mf
I
*t-J
.1:
n-fKftS,^
II
•i
^1:.^>
®
Sataisl.fc.li
Segment Overview
Existing Condition
Pasadena Avenue runs north-south with two lanes in each direction. The curb-to-curb width is 50 feet. Limited access to side streets is provided on the west side frontage.

Residential frontage exists on the east side only. No on-street parking or bikeways are provided. 5-foot sidewalks along the west side are buffered by a 7-foot landscape area. The east side asphalt sidewalks are non-standard and in poor condition.

Arlington Garden and Westride School are key destinations along this segment.

Proposed Improvement
The key improvement recommendation along this segment is a Class IV cycle track on the east side of Pasadena Avenue. The bikeway is proposed to be elevated and separated from the roadway section by a half-height curb. ft
n
•ffi % -.•»I l'\
The 4-foot separation between the bikeway and roadway provides sufficient width for tree wells and new street and pedestrian scale lighting. Reconstructed concrete sidewalks will be provided on the east side.

Additional improvements along this segment include:

Minor street curb extensions and crossing
enhancements
Additional controlled pedestrian crossing between
Glenarm and Bellefontaine (location TBD)
Aesthetic and functional enhancement to street
closure at Wigmore Drive

KEY MAP
Glij
li?
'ft
^
I-
•^
•»,
(•M
ft.
-ft .•-,;/"1- ^.
^
*
» :1
<• ,)
tJ.
i»v •s
i-., sk •.I ;.!.'£- 0 -»" .<rf
<Im^
i
5 Coy ft; s'd
Mtcwwii
lte»»St
W Ur»io" St
tWt**
Own St
OLB

PASADENJA
WCXiUfiSt
WVaBuyStId-.
^;(^
W Did M»r Blv(*
n.mtyOf 2>
I
W Sotlcvyc &(
r
.\t
?
t
I
sc
SzfAiAlitw "[
t
•fcaprt**
l.nt^.wU
riuf-if.^
Wy ii i.c!1
Bt.-feicWf
\,yt.VS- ,,-,^.

GIU1.4T. St
a'...'t"K
I
Ray F
»-•
^ ""^ EJK3xafctM.pb»B
lOCOi?
Op^^SlrcMf.'tip
10 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary Pasadena Avenue (Bellefontaine Street to California Boulevard) ^
-^^^6.
•!M
'-:ji
^m
®
lii
^
1->-
t s
li
I's
I Kl
s
+
Uam
B>»i' Cor 9<
•
K V^8tjil<l'"f)
s
s^f«
^
wutd
«l»u
>*-^
t
I
if
tri
/
Segment Overview
Existing Condition
Pasadena Avenue is one-way in the northbound direction, forming a couplet system with St. John Avenue. The curb to curb width is 44 feet, featuring on-street parking on the west side. 6-foot sidewalks on each side of the street are separated from the roadway by 12-foot landscaped buffers. The Waverly School farm and Ronald McDonald House of Pasadena are key destinations on the west side. Huntington Memorial Hospital property extends the entire length of the east side frontage.

Proposed Improvement
Along this segment, the improvement recommendation is to continue the Class IV cycle track northerly from Bellefontaine.
? I -a- -"^ ^a- :i i I
a
I
•%•
Pliinftnu *tri)>
3-
Vifr L>*»Bi-tow 9i^I»r-
If 4-
Pl»t<!n»t».» 9-linM*.
hlowever, unlike the southerly segment of Pasadena Avenue, the sidewalk and landscape area on the east side are in good condition.

Therefore, rather than a full reconstruction of the east side frontage, it is recommended the Class IV facility be continued at street grade along this segment, separated by vertical bollards or delineators.

KEY MAP Additional improvements along this
segment include:

Reconfiguration of Bellefontaine
intersection to eliminate free right
turn lane (reduce driver confusion)
Provide signalized and raised
crosswalk between Huntington
Memorial hlospital and Ronald
McDonald House
Necessary traffic signal upgrades
will be included
§'1
r
GFWI St
W0*)tfer6ivd
OLO

PASAOENA
W Dayton ST
•^
I
I,
Scllcv^e Or
O^tyf-
it
"i-r.,
i?
r
H..I •Kiijrt.t)
M^-^it-J
^tufrtir
-*i*r.-ai
""»—•°' H,,,ft«S,
fiL-tnicW: ^,,<^;"3r W.'.j.

Glanjw i>l
Coii/'nfa^St Ra'y!
I 31000 ff 3
^i I'Srraiiiflp.-.i.rt;, -oFs,,si,^fa »
11 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary St. John Avenue (Belief onta'me Street to California Boulevard) Segment Overview
Existing Condition
St. John Avenue is one-way in the
southbound direction, forming a couplet
system with Pasadena Avenue. The curb-to-
curb width is narrower than Pasadena
Avenue, at just 32 feet, featuring on-street
parking on the west side. 5-foot sidewalks
on each side are separated from the
roadway by 8-foot landscaped buffers.

Singer Park is a major destination on the
north end of this segment, drawing visitors
from the neighborhoods and nearby
Waverly School and Sequoyah School.

Proposed Improvement
The primary objective is to calm traffic along
this segment. The narrow roadway width
precludes the ability to designate a bikeway.

Curb extensions are recommended at the
St. John Avenue intersection with California
Boulevard and the SR 710 off-ramp. This
improvement will slow traffic exiting the
freeway and entering the neighborhood
context of St. John Avenue.

KEY MAP
t
?
tflrt^&mon
Mwum
Sl^St
f3(
to^hl
C.IK.lSt
W D»l M<f 8tvr-'
WMKtyDr
C»4^.-.t
)te&,-,i
Wjr'fW St
OLD
PA5AOKNA
Wa.iy»>.i5t
WVaK^Si.

II
i,WBoiinueQr
;\' -.•
:rjt
l"fi<l;1
•tf.-lfK^
Cu<UJt
T*«tl
Vf's)'
•^
I
i-
,"'
?
I
r
HifrflngK-"
^(lif'jnt«--<»S<
K,,rilwl ^
a<.-faic'ff-
•<.«.*>•<» M'v.

Quntir- ^
M*"»;ir» 0>
C.^i.-ib-a St
I
Ray rr
.f"I .WCOf?
3 : l:if®»/@Baiiite:Ma(A<»»Of<n5«»nMm
incoff
m
.A.
^
IS
SS£i
f-,rii,itl!vd
-.!!!'»•
I T
Is,
i &-*- ~ ^ - -•-
FtSinger P^rk.,
I
•a
^':^J6'
:.•
1 SB
,.w
A^tfl:
i^-:
m
<1">
...Wl'.»
/ y,g^m ^
^
s«s••sf., •y-Jf. 3<
g •;
a»a <•a
' :^ •Yar;f \m
f. ^1*
% «
%^I~<:
»CT?n>.*B5S»^a^*rtV
s
^
5ft 5ft
\
It is recommended to modify the typical cross section for this segment with narrower travel lanes, to calm traffic, and by designating a 3-foot buffer between the parking aisle and southbound motorists, to ease passenger loading and
unloading.

Additional improvements along this
segment include:

Reconfiguration of Bellefontaine intersection to eliminate free right turn lane (reduce driver confusion)
Provide signalized and raised crosswalk at the south end of Singer Park to further calm southbound motorists
existing the freeway
Aesthetic and functional enhancement to street
closures at Congress Place and Markham Place
Traffic signal upgrades to the extent feasible
•
•
^<
12 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary Pasadena Avenue (California Boulevard to Del Mar Boulevard) -^-^ii^tS,
M6i!te?@M
3 h
t
fc1W4
*- t
Ill
»i
t
3 ,A •;
^
<
Ift. :*t
Segment Overview
Existing Condition
This segment of Pasadena Avenue continues as a northbound-only two- to three- lane roadway. This segment is three lanes leading to the SR 710 ramp, after which point the roadway transitions to two lanes. The curb-to-curb width varies from 44 to 34 feet. On the east side, sidewalk varies between 10-feet wide and 5-feet wide, where a 5 foot landscape buffer is provided.

On the southernmost end, this segment serves an important role for Sequoyah School, providing primary access to parking, drop-off, and pick-up. This is the only section of this segment to feature sidewalk on the west side, separated from the roadway by a 20-foot landscaped buffer.

Proposed Improvement
Along this segment, the proposed two-way Class IV cycle track is continued at both street-level grade, south of Palmetto Drive, and raised between street and sidewalk grade between Palmetto Drive and Del Mar Boulevard.
cfe lcfe
•••L:< -^ill
h-..-i10ft8ft2ft10ft
(I
fcWhere on-street parking is provided, curb
extensions are recommended to enhance
s
i^
^-..!
minor street crossings. ^
^ ^Improve Sequoyah School
access with left turn lane.

Continue sidewalk north to
raised signalized crossing
at Palmetto Drive. Raised
crosswalk provides traffic
calming benefit.
*s v
M<KEY MAP
I- a
^
^t- ^
R
v1 ,»;"
Js <?? ^ •r
HcBv'il
II
.(to^ •-^;ti* .aW Union St
«
i
OLO

PASADENA
^fWp^<l
?? ^
^
Ji;^T<
ft »- <WUayton St
s <;•
;>n
s
^WV.lhniSt
A
^
^W Dttl hU'B'-.'d •I
^^sssessiSs
...^ ms t ».^'
s, t;
? g; •s
l^iifBRL ?ia ^<<l^t?
»,^«s Vi» Ka
?^SB
m
z
^£i; !•<
Cwu
y^s^ 's;"£35-
^
4 sw,
•'"-*
>••Or EV/m"io»<
^^ws
Huiibwa »;r
%I •4BrtteW.IC »^tf6f. S' W^. r fftm•—*— »;f
I^!;. -7^\ ..'-Glatwtv.-iA ••»»•
t fi^:
<?aa-a ^
i ft
im
I
(Uw..t,,t a . Ba<ms
^ I ;?10001?
3 "i::-II^f.yKn«irf!?.-M^b,,-oF».sr™t;c a
r
o'fe.'N E?*•! i
^IMSS
13 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary St. John Avenue & Pasadena Avenue (Del Mar Boulevard to Colorado Boulevard) Segment Overview
Existing Condition
St. John Avenue and Pasadena Avenue resume as one-way
couplets between Del Mar Boulevard and Colorado Boulevard.

Within these segments, the curb-to-curb widths are mostly 34 feet, although St. John Avenue north of Green Street is wider to accommodate a third southbound lane. Marantha High
School is a key destination on St. John Avenue.

Existing Class II bike lanes are striped in portions of these roadway segments, and on-street parking is provided mostly throughout. Sidewalks are located on the west side and east side of St. John Avenue and Pasadena Avenue, respectively, measuring between 5 and 6 feet, with landscaped buffers.

Proposed Improvement
Reduced right-of-way and reduced curb-to-curb width forces the termination of the Class IV cycle track. Robust bikeway connections are recommended at the Del Mar Boulevard
intersections, incorporating protected intersection elements. 51i
Att4 ft
Class II bike lanes are widened to a minimum of 6 feet, providing buffers between parking aisles where feasible.

KEY MAP
tAaei-i-
:.:,St
r^w. S;
W^i.!*4'Pi-(<
W<t«»tv
p^^r'FhA
:;...1
•ft V^.ijK S'
«u.»-,o.

I L~"~"I n];'
f "" eI I
•^i.t
Co^ttff^P'
w
;* UM^fl I
^
SdlcfwtapxSt
W.<t»Wi',^
tl.-W^.:
^,^fV"' > ft.. yi
(yar>,FtT. St
Cultmbua „ "•'•>'
/ I .100CI? J".^E-A.£.^M^FfaiK SOi-^ilrL.^r/^s.
(I
-i.

W^fisre^sigM
•> •
j~-s
t
!j
!%:
r 11I* »"~
{ r?\
<.-
ll
-<*•*:•> iIli -^* @<c
d^'. (
-s,^-; ?>i /
»^—
S^=3
<
I •I r ^r' v0<» I
^i
e.
t.
-^
I
<<
?<R!lA
•a
?
^
»
iiN" Th.
?'---i
tt s
^
'/ <
r-- fc
^
•I-
.0 ™ wfur
» I
®K; Mi,
^I -k ^
}
& %-- ?<?'
R-it fe.
^
-1^
••
f ^"•y
r
.1
I'^ <SF
IIt»
a
*t;
s•u» ^rf •^-
A '% s
a ^ra
»<1\IS
^ 31VSSMSto^sS
fc
Southbound Class II bike
lanes on St. John Avenue
transition to Class IV as
they approach Del Mar
Boulevard where SR 710
off-ramp traffic mixes with
surface street traffic.

Necessary traffic signal
upgrades will be included
14 Attachment A - GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary St. John Avenue & Pasadena Avenue (Colorado Boulevard to Walnut Street) Segment Overview
Existing Condition
The St. John Avenue and Pasadena Avenue study corridors continue as one- way couplets north of Colorado Boulevard and terminate at Walnut Street. The curb-to-curb widths are about 34 feet, except for a three-lane section of St. John Avenue south of Green Street.
10-foot sidewalks are provided on the west side of St John Avenue without landscape buffer. On Pasadena Avenue, 5-foot sidewalks and landscape buffers are provided south of Union Street. Wider 12-foot sidewalks with tree wells and landscaping are provided north of Union Street. 5-foot Class II bike lanes are provided on each roadway, with on-street parking on all segments except Pasadena Avenue north of Union Street.

Proposed Improvement
As with the segments between Del Mar Boulevard and Colorado Boulevard, the recommendation is to widen Class II bike lanes to a 6-foot minimum.

In order to provide southbound bicycle connectivity from hlolly Street to St John Avenue, a short two-way Class IV cycle track section is recommended between Holly Street and Union Street. At Union Street, southbound cyclists will cross the SR 710 freeway stub in a parking-protected Class IV bikeway. ••..-]
7F
^y-^
f-a
•t
b 'i",t
^ ^
.^
i^®^2*'^
I!
t ;
I
.«1...

NS".
•Ss
ji
T
•ar. ^
-^'\ /
^
F* ^ *
{

KEY MAP
s / »
h•syi
^*
.• •»
\
•• l=»y ji
-lt
^ ^ f
»»•J-:

OLD
PA^ADEN/.•^ R^t
f
•'» Wtij/to-i^
\1<
^
WAlttoySt
t.

W Unl M*'- e^d
Wwly Ur ,0"?
-.<
^'
WSotlanicDr*••.
0 ? IKSSSpStHolly St ?
-^'
s'1 1
I r I
ts ^1*t s
Ij
Munfwytt
"kt.pltal

1.3 .,,t<
MJ^s t.'»
Bdl.^rt.wSl
•Jk^*:a
•Vf^.^f^
»f;
^ ei.'tafc-A
^,K(to" > A;f9../.»a« uii T. WEffia w
.J
OlOTlrftP- 3t
<?
n'< <li^
I—'*,? :t
.-.^*•: '^ s.,E-.

Jtefia? ^
Kl@ I•;
6 »-
Wvfi»»
G^^^'.i St
^__1 -j^l-A
'->•' \^ LAiLlJtlf'..-; M.tpbaa c.Op^^rc^'^s
15 I
.<"'
V)
C
•EI
i ^
U)
I
(D
^
%
il^ w
^i-2.1
i'l<u
I
a)
(0
Q lij^l-^
^m=
ill
<
c
J=
2"
u
u
?i
^
(0
's,
11 .ro
U)
%

11.1^^
il."s9:^^^w:
li%
Ill
! I I
Ill
^-s^
0) Ul CQ
Ill
W -Q
ili."i ^
"3 E
ro
§
ro
E
I
? 2'°^^ 2^1
U)
I</)
Ero
3 ro
ro5 s'-c; -£.-°
2 -?.y
(U"
3 ^:
c

II11
co
I
0 a.
2 Ili
n3
il
•II
(U <
£ co
sl
-I
</)
in
£
03 y)
I
a>
•o
y)
-5
1>
II
Ill
IP
;1
I
0) u)
;lw!
III!IIIJ&
fill
^s-s
IIr• I»a
SFairOaitiAvff
s §1 ?it
Ji s 0 i0 •s a y•s
I i11 2 i E
„ § ? i I -<^ » B
Pat-idTd Aw
i
t
3^ S St Jciins h"fr'"B^ s 3 °
I I ! las !! i. B s s
^. .Om.8hdOmr-g
{Is
!
I l! ^ i <•
•s
a)
••-^». -;•• w
1 w^< w«»^ B^| (U
.gor.?^- .mI s»n ..o-^'
^ c:E ^r. ? ( dr £Q*ylv J;«m
-53@ rm"
-^ GQ•* f* <^ c
•l. s <
^z ^ c? TOf*"2> (Ds»s:. c
(U•I c
€
•a0);'\>- ^ £ m
§>.1 ^ Q.
*<^*-
„->.

TO(U T3.s; czsI•tf
ro roc^- a> (D
[^^
ct». >
E<tv < 0
-a*•>». co
w
c
ro^^1 (DA^
Ul-0
-TOE(04>^ r in.t-!
f2(0s^.-*1 a. 0)€
i ^.€s 'sr <Lro::tls "
lift
V-»( ^ c (0 U)
^0 (0
t c
a
30}'a3 0>
^<
>
2 J=(0 •£% •^ cT3 0<uc c:"aU)3% ro% (U0d ^i8
^•f
s.£1
~m a.••*: t;
s-0 -00 c
M ^
c (0

2..£i ,
(Uro
:i.^^5
Iss?<u8® ^.^^ c
•?£dK* £t
?»?'.»- (0
m
<^».* ~m JwJ (U -0 ^c
-53-0 c04» ro c:OQ ro•^ a5
f
D)ro% £U3-sQ.£ s c 93
0c E(0
^"^ a) (D0 -0<u% -s s
u £-,' 0)^-^

7. c
^ vs2s 30 0U 00u
41 Q.••
gi
Q:
co
i
I
."
£
c
0 I
I
w
.r
I
I
^.

I1
0 i
Q.
co
g
1 ^
I
c
tI
i S
I
0)'
I
^
.ro
^
ro
i
0 ^
a:
03 0)
-5
(U
{
c
^z
0 —s
w
"?a?
!
-5
IIII
(fl
.§11
II
x
(U
£
§ w
^ iu.i^^'-§
Ill,
Q-u £
8§-£
<u (U 3c c
Ill
^3 ^
lit
s
^^1
I0 n D-
c
(U
ro
g5
^^£^5
U3 CB TO
-^ 3
II!
(U
I
1£II" ^

1.11 lit
ro ^ o)
i8r£^i
(Dro
?il
, ro•*? —
Illl!i
IIs
I
LU U
(D
CO •55
II!
a) (/>
;11
£
}
<u
c
ro
1 I
ro
i
E
s
(D
I
1 '§St
I.

E
<u
-0
Q.
s
i
^
0)
i
c
X:
6 i
I
i
I
55 's
CT
^
?
I
c
0 c
ro
I
I
(!
0)
c
"?
I
I
^
^
I
u
•s
t
I
.1
s
§
II
j
I
ro
I
U)
m
Q.

Lo
™
^
%
tpa3
c
0 0
I
u
a 'i u
H
h/i .:

I
-T
J ll Si
SF^.rOa^
a x
-£ ji yT4
hn?"«
c
-s
i a »
i \i Is
'» P.twdWAAf
3s
I
r. St John Av«s
ii I & i t1.! iS3
li !@ S i\
Gi^aBivd^ Orawi"
II
s
t ».y
I I I
^^^r
r~"»
El •-^A
^
*?.*„;
Is*i T"
<ifc.
ta-g^i
t f* ^
•B •v- ft
^m 1.^
.-•?
w »>'s U3^;'« t3f
:-..- /
h.,-SSay»
« »--.-*r"»-«!r*!'•..«; *"1
.•-S—B—B
ggiiea&EiSti® ~ gj;|
-^j 1c
$^ '{f-t »s
d
L.
s.,
t<JKsf•4
/;.
^^.
;»I
r
ri :-»%
f
E»p'
'"'
\*!. I
*i:-^
x St I
fel'
I^rlK 1
»; '-^
;i.
f
A frfc Jfc.AR >-^..^^
^
'c
^S( ^
;'
r ..
1^.
^ 3AL-1'5-^S .^"-"s'-.
^
M
r
Si,:*
•msss'sssf
ssayi r: ^^^^§^^'^^^.^
3r°:' I
I T^t
^;?
--*y
w
LJ;» ey\ fe<I-S»
I ^ I^-
«Si^
I
-<"'co
-00
I!
^ Ql
i"^g^ s
(U
Sl5|
c
§i•S sI
u} c
|fS
~>
*- T3 C/3in
(U
^
c 03 W
^ i
£E li
II i I
8^1:1u
w1^s|?^
m
Q-
g
f
a)
Ul
cn
u
c
.^
c •55
g
(U
£
I
0 0)
.^•11^
slitII I i
l~sM31
I
Q-
-2
s
^
^
cn
s
s
c
i^ll
ro '= 05 ro GQ
li.

U)
a3
i- ~0
ill
< Q ^ ."2
l^i
0 r~-
01 w
0)
's
I
w
-c:
-0
II s I
iiii^111
;111Ill
co
sl"
co -a
0 "
III!i^s-2
111!ill!
^
^
!^i
1^
l>il.?^5r^
s(D
00 E3 c,.£l cn(U(US St JohnAy«
B. >E•, 1 I s
s
ii ' 2t ® 0)f. Q-
IE .=(D?
.i u\ v>Or»w0i»"»t"i ^'& s1-1 0f
I (D£t ?I II 0)1 =3
£ c
(0 (D
1 % ->X3
0<0 2^i E yro»41.f t=E c: 0)0(U0 >^ u•s -0
ro 8 0fc 0)ri ,1•s. 0</iro £ro
N i^s a. 0)
^(^
^
u:•» T3£-c sc Cfl(0 (0ro
(D (Uu -0
iS d)
s' 0)^sa.w"'.i-OI'SSf,I. 03 c<ut.saeai-a.»E""-X"
w ^sesiStssSsys 0)> ^0<>.'... E'. ~m><
i" ro cujSW^ $^ifc 0®36^lW V d)2•f® sc0) }- 0
-0-0-s'a c% "a?
I 0 TO >'.

Sl s>,
^ ^ ns ^0) -0»-/ K-f 5s
^^
c 0)c
6!'J £<
Ero
s•<•' V,F^>*•w s E
s 0) £0
£uv^
5a? "scro v0)a)£as;
^ CB(0ro
'£%s><
h Ft -0 J3 0c
3 u0) c
2Ey) Q:-E^ ~Q 
e- ro£S•>-•• 0/' » U)
^ U)K^ Q.(U
^ g£/^^ u^ wis^^ 0)~* <- s 13 £c
£-,'J w -0(0^ (D i2:A -£-0
^^>. a. o ^-EN l?i 0c
-r^' -TO ^ s:s's (U^<>^^ ^ u(0 £I sgiMaAirf: C*"m u•«< -•s' sFww"----'-- 'I TTiSat)St!«a8»a^RX^S3>.<uiCi).,aiSu«.;.i"--"»-w'i .(
S-M^ •s'^ a.)
^^ s>(U.<:
m*- 0

2.:•? -D
t
u
%3^ ':i^ c >>(D 3 Q.<•^ 0(U uU)^'"•:..
£E0)«.i,^•tf y>
^ £1. 1"&i U)E^s 1
<u;3 0)
£0%i; s ^y u
^» 02£?^ (D
<1
Q.
t ^ d)a. 2(0i^p- •>t'^'3^^ roro
i
.d. &.I-* 0)(0
At^
co
ro
M
w00
.wco
^1
II
=
s s
II
0 1-i§1
il
II
11ro-g
<" i2
s s.
l!II°-s
a? ^
1^
ll.
-3 0}
ro a? 'S
li^
g% §
m m cn
Ill
slsill
1-E:Sill^ ii
ill
.^^ iU^E^
Pl
Ill
0 W
5 yo
o a> c:
^ 11a5 5 'G
? s £-^ w-^0) C '0
ro Q0) 0
.t£SII-!S i s
" 2 ^
illl

11.1'i
<!^||a^'o£
•r2 rs•§^t%
l£E §^ ^
'3 m£ 
wQ.
§1
(fl
(U
0 '= ^
i§ 1:1'^11-6 -1-1 di
c
Ill
°3-"
§il
-0 a) -"
i ii
IllIll
<u
w a.

Ill^s-l
ro -p -c
5 c o
^^- g-
5 CT.•c ."

11.^
I S 0)-
iilIll
0 ro'°
^£ 2^ml
"53-S"-2 00
Ill
£^5-0
Ill
ro -Q -c
itil
ES.i-c
III!
& c
>.
'&
5 (T^
^^li
ii
0)
Illi
IHt8^1
.'s ^."-<. ^-^.i2^^ '5 'E a) S _"> £ ro
LUUD^ Q:±;ro5
(D
c
^
I
(U
I
.E1
I
ro
(0
.r
I
J3
<u
r~
(
@
~i TTi .§1 -
5 a l/s . «
L it
Sfa:rC.'t«A'-e
s
-D
* !
P.iuidwjt Aua
s
I
'S i
's
s
'S f
v I
.» i a E
i
SStj€ihnA<rf6
S 1(
!»
s
Orapg»Orw<Blwti
^ _',
I II
a
i
tl
J st'l
3 ~i
E|
't
s;
V
]E":I..JE.ST1
< t 1: "& !
^j6,
"s .*-
^,
»"•
c
"-^——B—Sg"'^
agiaEa^K® ^ „
B^iu
1 f•8
T-
»•!
ri^<
s>.s
^^r^ anpK^
.^4» "y i \^-s
SRsgateiBtKea
0)
r•yrr•e
^. -^Mr;flfE» ^3
*1 s
•...IK^a
*>
-0
s
": fc«^'
u
^s ••r
^ Eft, -^•^^
v>
U3—•»-K c
0 u
-K <u^-^ -0
2s
ro
Q.oar»-- .—- It I
(D
VI
(- 0
01 t»--s <u•^
£
•o
'^
s«*. rt"
te ro-33Sa V*
In ><
^ C "5
0 S
0 0)
^ c ^
.CT-Q<»
in 0
231 Es m
1 a.•£„.
3=5i '•"w-fl, I! •
01 8
£'
(0
I
V)
0)
Is
I
.£.
a-
's
w
£
^
QI
0 
^
°.ro
!<*^ £' u%
Ssi-if. ttl
(U
.T-"
a>-0 cn
gw
c'a?
5 a.
s
E°
u
a
Ill I
Ip I
0^
co
I
%Ul
^••<:•>-.?'
(U
n;
u
w
c:
co
^ ^
c
^
(U
[.s
0 -:
ro ~o> ®<fl
i'^k
0 >tr-;
a.
^ s^^V.—- y
^
^r'^^ ^
T
^ r
/
<u
x^-^ ^
§
w
yy
£
w »'<<•.
^^^: ^^
5^y
s ^€
o.-ffl
-.^
Ec
y.••-
ro •°. ro
^
'•;<
-, y=
'it {.% ife^ 0 -0
te*
£ 0
s CN]
gg m T3a
0 8 A ssss &
g 0^
g's grg ts y
I ^te
sgs
5 CT)
K s^^
a
^
^
s^
a
.<•'• ^•£ffl*•
^.
^ 2
5 R
I s"
I +
€ ^ f
s1^0) ^
liilISlijiltIS it8 -? ^ '^
till
Q: Z CO U
(8
E
E
3 w
a>
I
I
t
15 c
.0
aOT
I
I
«s
Qr
0 <
0)
E
I
<
1^|I
^
s.^0" ro
£ .^
™ 30
^? 'E C0
Ill
^^ -2
i|5
illw fl3
IIs:5rl
If I
0 ^~w•Q.
^"^
S 5 a:
^--0 C
ill
Ill.3i%•sii
^!1'^ilillIf^
0) 0-<
£^i
c ro a>
i.11•S-o
^^ §
jli
-° r.
0) 01
C .£
Ill
 5 -£
'Mli!i
$ "0 P •Q
jll^iN?21a:§-6l.t
Q-
s
ro
^<<?
%s>z
a
^I
^s&
•>p
'0sa a jfc5 S' •V
gs
^
52 9
\^^s §I s|ii s gg
fe'g s3 ss
g»
esll §
m
si51
s5 gs li 3e'„ yssS 3
v
BiuiII
s fyy
.'•
Sfc
-<
\f^ff/' \••!(..»
^
^%
^mf\s-:
%
K
is-&:'^.tf^s^ ^ ^
?
^^ ^^
"to
•\^
^ ^
;)•
&
/
^*>1\ ^I^t~
^<by^
I
a
. -T'
\^..
ii..::18
»
Xk.
•M
s
B

1. ^fm^S.\
\ ^
<
^ '»•Y •\<.s81 .^^>.
\ &\i
\
•i
\A
^ ,.\•^
\^ \ >,
% \>-\ \»H^
r ^',
\
-?
V:^s ^
7' \ ^s
1 s
)l
%
\
&^ \ ».<•'.a
\\4 <t
\
\\
CM
Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary

4.Improvement Cost Estimates
For each of the project locations, costs for the proposed improvements have been estimated and are summarized in Table 2 below. The project costs are shown as lump sum and include Traffic Control, Utilities, Removals, Concrete, AC Pavement, Traffic Signals, Street Lighting, Landscaping, etc. Additionally, based on City staff input, soft costs are included such as Conceptual/Final Design, Project Management Support, Material Testing, Construction Contingency and Capital Overhead.

Table 2: Summary of Improvement Costs by Project
Project
Columbia Street (Orange Grove Blvd to Fair
Oaks Ave)
Project Cost
$ 9,900,000
Pasadena Ave and St. John Ave Roadway
Network (Walnut St to Columbia St)
*0range Grove Blvd at Colorado Blvd
*San Rafael Ave at Colorado Blvd
Total Project Improvement Costs
$ 75,100,000
$ 4,500,000
$ 4,800,000
$ 94,300,000
* Includes work outside the limits of this study.
22 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development SummaryGHD:

Appendix A
Summary of Comments Provided at August 9, 2022 Open House Meeting A total of forty-eight 'post-it' comments were placed on poster boards from the August 9, 2022, Open House Meeting captured in the table below. Comment topics included bikeways, pedestrian, traffic signal/light, traffic calming, roadway, transit, wayfinding, and development. This bulleted list identifies the topics, abbreviations, and number of times the topic was noted.

Bikeways(B); 15 • Roadway (R); 3
Pedestrian (P); 12
Traffic Signal/Lights (TS); 7
Traffic Calming (TC); 5
Trees/ Greening (TG); 4
Poster Board Comments
Transit (PT); 2
• Development (D); 2
Wayfinding (W); 2
Enforcement (E); 1
Poster Board 1# [CommentFo pic
Sidewalks in project area need to be replaced. I recently tripped in an area not marked for replacement. Required stitches and a tooth crown. p 1
puild or develop nearHuntington Hospital south near the fork.2D Building concern near the fork on both side where the hospital is located and could be developed
3D
Traffic light ©Arlington &Pasadena to reduce traffic accidentsTS 4 5 '[Re-landscape fork-in-the-road park area; Plant trees not saplings along Pasadena and St John Avenues
TG
Make sure bike lanes connect north-south from north of Walnut &the 134 to the stub area
6p
7 iConsider funding options, even creative ideas for the original walkway plan from City Hall area to the Arroyo, near Holly
p
8 [More trees, native plants, ram garden to capture rainwaterG iCaltrans maintaining 2 lots usable for parkingPK 9
10 Protected bike lanesB
—^ The Power of Commitment
12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development1 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
I
[OG bus route south of California for work and school^T Prefer route 2SPT
^To speed bumps (St John)
|Yes,on speed humps. Yes!
fTC
trc
pVtore speed tables and traffic calmingtrc
|Yes,on traffic signal and raised crossing at this location (St John @ iSingerPark)
(Fix sidewalks plant trees (not saplings) and put in crosswalks RLight timing for enhanced ped &bike access @ California IP/TS
|}/TG
|Why not major street curb extensions forbetter pedestrian safety and [amenity?
^/B/TS
[p
I
[Traffic light at Arlington Garden^rs
[Open dead ends at: Congress PLMarkham Pl, and Wigmore Dr T
10 [Signs showing ak routes to 110 south (Bellefontaine St and St John [Ave)
^
|w
1ive the separated bike lanes!IB
I
|12 |I hope that the trees in the area between the bike lanes and the traffic pB/TG [lanes will actually happen. Dense shade is essential.
|13 |Traffic cakning
14 Parking protected bike lanes would be much better (Columbia St) 15 6ike lanes on Columbia will be great to provide safer bike access to the u^rroyo.
tTC
!°
Is
[16 ;-New concrete sidewalks on both sides of street would be great. Current especially on east are terrible (Pasadena Ave)
17 JADA cross walks &re signal with pedestrian priority (Columbia St) [18 [Class rVbike lanes on Pasadena Ave are great! Yes-Please do it.

P/TS
te3
12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development2 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
20 ^
2 3
5 19 [Excessive speed is a huge problem on this corridor! Yes, please calm |TC [traffic via speed tables and the protected bikeway (Pasadena Ave next | puntington)
[Add a spoon (Bellefontaine St)^
21 IPlease restore parkways &add new native trees to improve walkability. [P 22 [Light with crosswalk (Arlington Ave)
23 Bulb cuts at crossing of Pasadena Ave at Glenarm for safer pedestrian ;rosswalks.
24 ^e ft turn signal from Pasadena Ave to Glenarm for safer left turns. 25 ]Add crosswalks/ speed table
|26 |Yes. Please eliminate this slip lane, cover with mulch and plant with latives. (Bellefontame St to Pasadena Ave)
|27 [Bike lanes need to be really protected - bollards aren't enough |28 please consider more robust protection than a plastic bollard |29 fThis bike lane vacuum at this offset intersection creates major bike [safety issues (Pasadena/Columbia/Freemont)
P/TS
TS
p
R
B
B
1 Great! Hopefully, bike lanes can link to north of Holly &the 134 too - B jmuch needed
[Consider unprovements @210 &134 on ramps -wayfinding
[Excellent! (Reference to Colorado Blvd class FV)
|w
-1—
|4 [Concern of vehicles turning movement and decision-makmg changing llanes (exit from SR710 to St John and Del Mar)
'Raised curbs really good bike protection.
11 |No more door zone bike lanes > Class TV are much better |2 pnforce speed limits along St. John and Pasadena Ave B
B
E
12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development3 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
Summary of Responses from Online Survey
710 N Stub Transitional Project Development Online Survey Responses Question #1 is optional and confidential as survey responses included address and nearest cross street locations.

2. How do you typically travel in the project area? Check all that apply, 29 responses
Drive
Bicycle
Walk (including use of mobility
devices such as electric scooter
or skateboard)
Public Transit
-17(58.6%)
1-18(62.1%)
-3 (10,3%)
.26 (89.7%)
0102030
Majority 'drive' followed by 'walk- and -bicycle'.

3. blow often do you travel in the project area?
29 responses
Multiple times per day
Daily
A few days per week
Weekly
A few times per month
Nearly 60% indicated that they travel in the project -Multiple times per day', as well as -Daily".

4. How frequently do you bicycle in the area?
21 responses
Every day
A few times a week
A few times a month
Majority of responses bike 'a few times a month' in project area. 12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development4 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
710 N Stub Transitional Project Development Online Survey Responses

5. How frequently do you walk/run in the project area?
23 responses
• Every day
• A few times a week
• A few times a month
Majority of responses walk/run 'a few times a month' in project area.

6. How safe do you feel when bicycling on along streets within the project area? 29 responses
Very safe
Moderately safe
Somewhat unsafe
Not safe
I don't bike
About 76% feel streets are 'Not safe' when hiking along streets in project area.

7. How safe do you feel when walking or running?
28 responses
• Very safe
• Moderately safe
• Somewhat unsafe
• Not safe
• I don't walk/run
About 36% feel streets are 'Not safe' and about 46% 'Somewhat unsafe' when walking or running, 12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development5 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
710 N Stub Transitional Project Development Online Survey Responses

8. If you answered 'somewhat unsafe' or 'not safe' to questions 6 and 7, what are the elements that you feel make it unsafe? Check all that apply.
28 responses
Traffic/ congestion
Speed of traffic ]
Driver behavior/yielding to b...

Lack of sidewalks I
Lack of bike lanes]
Surrounding area feels unsafe,
Insufficient lighting
Road surface
Crossing distance
Appropriate/ safe street eras...

Unevenness and poor qualit...

Cracked sidewalks and inad...

Trucks
WE NEED A THREE WAY LI...

Too many abandoned house...

Not enough canopy. Area lo...

Detritus at the street edge
1-13(46.4%)
1-17(60.7%)
-3(10.7%)
-2(7.1%)
1—7 (25%)
1-10(35.7%)
1 (3.6%)
-1 (3.6%)
-1 (3.6%)
-1 (3.6%)
—1 (3.6%)
-1 (3.6%)
1 (3.6%)
-16(57.1%)
1-28 (100%)
-25 (89.3%)
1-25 (89.3%)
0102030
Most respondents selected 'Speed of traffic' that made them feel unsafe followed by "Lack of yielding tobikes/peds' and 'Lack of bike lanes'.

9. How frequently do you drive (motor vehicle)?
28 responses
• Every day
• A few times a week
• A few times a month
Less than half of responses indicated they drive "Every day'.

10. h^ow safe do you feel when driving on St. John Avenue or Pasadena Avenue? 28 responses

21.4%

53.6%

10.7%

14.3%
Very safe
Moderately safe
Somewhat
Not safe
I don't drive
When driving, more than 53% of respondents felt 'Somewhat safe' while about 21% felt "Not safe'. 12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development 6 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
710 N Stub Transitional Project Development Online Survey Responses

11. If you answered 'somewhat unsafe' or 'not safe' to question 10, what are the elements that you feel make it unsafe? Check all that apply.
21 responses
Traffic/congestion
Lack of sidewalks
Lack of bike lanes
Road surface
Speeding
Often unrealistic to hope for a i...

WE NEED A THREE WAY LIG...

We need a left hand turn lane a...

Risk of being rear-ended when...
making a left turn off of Pasade...

Aggressive passing
Driver behavior - lots of cars ch...
—10 (47.6%)
1-5 (23.8%)
-7 (33.3%)
-4 (19%)
-19(90.5%)
1-1 (4.8%)
-1 (4.8%)
-1 (4.8%)
-1 (4.8%)
-1 (4.8%)
-1 (4.8%)
-1 (4.8%)
05101520
Even amongst respondents who drive 'Speeding' was checked the most followed by 'Traffic/congestion'.

12. Is your commute typically:
28 responses
To a location within Pasadena
To a location outside of Pasadena, using
the on/off ramps to the 134 or 210
freeways
To a location outside of Pasadena, using
streets including St. Johns or Pasadena
Ave
About 61% commute To a location within Pasadena'.

13. When thinking about possible enhancements to the corridor, in what priority order would you place these elements?
Continuous sidewalks ^B Continuous bike lanes ^B Additional traffic signals or control ^B Reduced traffic speed 1/2 ^ 10 5
0 FirstSecondThirdFourthLast
Continuous bike lanes' were selected as first priority, followed second by 'Reduced traffic speed' & 'Continuous bike lanes', followed third by 'Continous sidewalks' & 'reduced traffic speed', and fourth 'additional traffic control'. •Other' was selected as highest for last position.
12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development7 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
710 N Stub Transitional Project Development Online Survey Responses

13.a If you selected 'Other (open)' in question 13 please provide response. 1 seems like more of this traffic shoukl go atong Raymond or Arroyo Bh/d. 2 DrougW tolerant Landscaping
3 Safe pedestrian crossings for Pasadena Ave.
4 Blocks are reall/ long here so some mkl-bfock crossings would realty help 5 Eliminate trucks using Pasadena Avenue
6 WE NEED A THREE WAY LIGHT AT GLENARM AND PASADENA AVE" 7 Shade and street trees
8 Dedicated turn lanes where there are currently none
9 Trees and shade, benches trash cans
10 More crosswalks
11 Ecotogical landscaping that provides canop/ and bfodiversity beneffls 12 Controlled turn lane at Glenarm/Pasadena
Four responses related to trees and landscaping; three responses related to crossings; two responses related to turn lanes; two responses include diverting traffic to Raymond and Arroyo and elminating trucks on Pasadena; one comment indicating threeway light on Glenarm and Pasadena Ave.

14. What is your age?
29 responses
0-18 years old
18-30 years old
30 - 45 years old
45 - 64 years old
65 or more years old
Prefer not to answer
About 83% of respondents were between 30 to 64 years old.

15. As what gender do you identify?
27 responses
• Female
• Male
• Non - binary
• Prefer not to answer
• This is seriously a ridiculous and
unnecessary question. Whomever
thought that this was relevant to a street
safety survey should be fired.

A majority of responses identified as Female.
12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development8 Attachment A
GHD Report: Transitional Projects Development Summary
710 N Stub Transitional Project Development Online Survey Responses

16. Please select the race/ ethnicity with which you identify. Check all that apply. 29 responses
Asian ^^^^^^^^^^^•—6 (20.7%)
Black/ African - American |--0 (0%)
Latino or Hispanic^^^^-2 (6.9%)
Native American h-0 (0%)
Native Hawaiian or Pacific lsla...^B"~'' (3.4%)
White]
Prefer not to answer^t"1 (3.4%)
Middle Eastern BB-1 (3.4%)
Again, my race has no bearing...^•-1 (3.4%)
0 5
20 (89%)
101520
See graph.

17. How long have you lived at your place of residence? 29 responses
•*-
0-3 years
3-5 years
5-10 years
More than 10 years
More than 25 years
Nearly 38% of respondents have lived in place of residence for more than 10 years followed by new residents who have lived in place of residence from 0-3 years.

18. How many children live in your household?
29 responses
• None
•2-4
• More than 4
• Prefer not to answer
See graph.
12575776 | 710 N Stub Transitional Project Development9

Pasadena City CouncilMarch 23, 2026

Pasadena City Council
March 23, 2026