Cities Index.
AR 9 PPT POWER POINT PRESENTATION

Pasadena City Council
April 6, 2026

Document
AR 9 PPT POWER POINT PRESENTATION
Meeting
April 6, 2026
Body
Pasadena City Council
Original file
2.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ww2.cityofpasadena.net. That file is the official record.

Office of the City Manager
City Council Priorities
Follow-up Workshop
April 6, 2026
Workshop Purpose
Part I – Budget Workshop Follow-up
• Confirm the five refined priority descriptions
• Agree on a reporting cadence and format
• Discuss a simple protocol for mid-year shifts in priorities • KPI approach
Part II – Funding Discussion
• Funding Realities & Strategic Choices
• Funding Approach for Top Priorities
• Local Funding Options
• Response to Council request regarding ballot measures 2 Council’s Top 5 Priorities
3 Council’s Top 5 Priorities
• Modernize fire department facilities & Enhanced Fire Prevention > Facilities upgrades; Training Center; Brush clearance • Improve roadways & implement pedestrian/bike safety strategies > Pavement condition, Enforcement, Pedestrian/bike safety • Invest in year-round shelter & transitional housing
> Year-round facility, Transitional housing, Pathway to stability • Move Pasadena decisively toward a carbon-free future
> Resolution 9977, Clean energy procurement, Infrastructure modernization
• Implement Economic Development Strategic Plan with
placemaking focus
> Economic Development Strategic Plan, Streetscapes, Neighborhood plans
4 Recommended Progress Reporting
• Quarterly Dashboard
> High-level Status update
> Traffic light indicators (on track / at risk / off track) > Short narrative on progress, challenges & risks
• Mid-Year Deep Dive
> More detailed review of each priority area
> Adjustments, reprioritization, and financial impacts
• Reporting Format – Decision Needed
> Full Council presentations
> Council committee review
> Public-facing website for transprarency and continues updates 5
When Should Priorities Shift?
• Possible Triggers:
> New funding or grant opportunities
> Significant constraints (staffing, capacity, cost escalation) > State/federal mandates or emergencies
> Prolonged lack of progress due to external factors
• Draft Adjustment Protocol:
> Trigger identified
> Staff analysis of impact
> Discussion & direction during quarterly or mid-year check-ins • Competing Priorities:
> Immigration policy development
> Investment policy
> Olympics
> Quasi-judicial appeals 6
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Where We Are Today With KPIs?
Departments already track hundreds of KPIs
• Most existing KPIs are:
> Activity-focused (counts, volumes, turnaround times)
> Operationally useful
• Departments developing new, outcome-based KPIs to
strengthen measurement of results.
• Introducing an initial set of revised KPIs for FY 2027 as a foundation for future expansion.
> Updated KPIs will be included in FY 2027 department budget presentations.
7 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
If KPIs Are Going to Drive Decisions…They Must Measure
the Right Things
• KPIs become meaningful when tied to Council’s goals
(beyond only the top 5)
• “Right” KPIs clearly show whether the City is moving the needle on the outcomes Council wants to influence.

How Council Can Shape Them
• As departments present their FY 2027 budget proposals, Council feedback will help refine and strengthen these
KPIs.
8 Funding Realities & Strategic Choices
• General Fund forecast does not anticipate capacity to increase funding for these priorities
• Federal reductions for formula funding not as severe as threatened, but grant eliminations are being realized
• Departments are already advancing work aligned with
the 5 priorities
> Priority work is being challenged by workload of other projects • Council discussion point:
> Staff can revisit proposed CIP and recommend projects shifts that only focus on the priorities when feasible/allowable
> Direct staff to bring back options for larger Operating Budget decisions (reallocation, reductions, new revenues, timing shifts) 9 Funding Approaches for Top Priorities
• Modernize fire department facilities & Enhanced Fire Prevention ($200M)
> Current Approach: Pursue new revenue sources.
• Improve roadways & implement pedestrian/bike safety strategies ($125M+)
> Current Approach: Pursue new revenue sources, re-evaluate all relevant CIP to prioritize achieving this goal.
• Invest in year-round shelter & transitional housing
($10M+ capital; $2-$4M annually)
> Current Approach: Leverage grants, County partnerships, and use of City-owned property for a future shelter.
• Implement Economic Development Strategic Plan with placemaking focus ($25M+)
> Current Approach: Pursue grants, consider EIFD, align with ongoing development activity.
10 Local Funding Options
• Use Tax similar to Measure I – general or special
tax
> Current capacity of quarter-cent - $11m annually
> Capacity depends on County measure and AB 1768
• Parcel Tax – special tax
> Could fund priorities around Fire and/or Streets
> Can be assessed on a variety of factors: parcel size, parcel use type, developed square footage, etc.
> Time limited or until repealed
• Benefit type district – special tax
> Likely Fire specific
> Could be a district of all or part of the City11
Local Funding Options
• Transfer Tax – likely a special tax
> Tax on real estate sales transactions
> Expected statewide November ballot measure to
prohibit local transfer tax
> Revenue can be volatile based on economic
climate
• Parking Tax – general of special tax
> Similar to TOT in terms of percentage tax charged
on parking rates
> Generally, applies to all paid parking
> Limited revenue growth over time
12 Local Funding Options
• November 2026 Election
> Would need to place an item by early August
> Expect a constitutional amendment on the
statewide ballot regarding voter initiated measures
and real estate transfer taxes
 Require all special taxes to receive 2/3 approval
 Prohibit all exisitng and future local transfer taxes • Benefit Districts
> Could follow various timelines not tied to a general
election
13 Ballot Measure Follow-up
• County Sales Tax Measure and AB 1768 (Bryan)
> Half-cent sales tax as a General Tax Measure
> Plan to allocate formula revenue to Pasadena/Long
Beach
> Current legal limit of quarter-cent unless AB 1768
approved
> Estimate of $22m of tax revenue generated in
Pasadena
> Cities opposed and expect legal challenges
• AB 1768
• Hearing of headwinds around approval of counties
pushing higher over the 2% cap
14

← All documents from this meeting