Cities Index.
AR 11 Attachment D - Request for Appeal

Pasadena City Council
May 18, 2026

Document
AR 11 Attachment D - Request for Appeal
Meeting
May 18, 2026
Body
Pasadena City Council
Original file
518 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ww2.cityofpasadena.net. That file is the official record.

m^~of
y^m'.fi
0 V.
^ei.
&''Sfw^

PASADENA PERMIT CENTER
www.cityofpasadena.net/permitcenterr^~ r-~ n,'r~H
z
'?"""REQUEST! 1FOR APPEALZl

APPLICATION INFORMATION
Project Address: 600 North Rosemead Blvd., Pasadena 91107 • - CITV CL£RK_
CiTY OF PASADENA
Case Type (MCUP, TTM, etc.) and Number: Consolidated Design Review, Case # DHP2026-00073 Hearing Date: 4-14-26 _ Appeal Deadline: 4-24-26

APPELLANT INFORMATION
APPELLANT:

Address:

City:

Lower Hastings Ranch Association
3850 Greenhill Rd.

Telephone: [
Fax: [
]
]
PasadenaState: CA _ Zip: 91107Email: [email protected] APPLICANT (IF DIFFERENT):

I hereby appeal the decision of the:

Hearing Officer
Design Commission
Historic Preservation

REASON FOR APPEAL
0 D Zoning Administrator ^3
Director of Planning and Development -
Film Liaison
0 5pSc;
a
f^s3
car~^
a'-<
3S»
~0
33 f^
f
^}
m
0 rn
»a'G
^. ,=.. m The decision maker failed to comply with the provisions of the Zoning Code, General Plan or othefc.SppiicaBIB plans-yi the following manner (use additional sheets if necessary): ^~, rv ».o
The Design Commission erred in approving the application for Consolidated Design review in that: (1) The project violates the General Plan, Land Use Element, Goal 33.1; (2) Density Bonuses were granted without adequate evidence that the project is within one-halfmile of a major transit stop as defined by GC§65915('o)(5') and PRC§21155(b); (3) The height proposed for Buildine B will exceed the maximum height permitted by the Zoning Code for this location; (4) The Noise and Vibration Technical Report used to grant a CEQA Class 32 Exemption was incomplete and /or inaccurate, in that it did not state or explain the aggregate noise levels caused by the proposed 150 HVAC outdoor condenser units and the impact on sensitive receptor sites; (5) The application was incomplete, in that it lacked required and/or satisfactory information causing the Design Commission to add 39 Conditions of Approval related to Design and Historic Preservation, and additional Conditions of Approval related to other City departments.

C7—^Q— 4-22-26
Signature of Appellant " Ronnie Po, President, LHRADate •OFFICE USE ONLY
PLN#CASE #

DESCRIPTION
DATE APPEAL RECEIVED:APPEAL FEES: $,
PRJ#
RECEIVED BY:

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CURRENT PLANNING SECTION
APP-RFA Rev: 1/18/07
175 NORTH GARFIELD AVENUE
PASADENA, CA 91101
T 626-744-4009
F 626-744-4785

ATTACHMENT D

← All documents from this meeting