Sabha, Tamer
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Rob Muthiah
Tuesday, May 12, 2026 3:16 PM
Sabha, Tamer
We don't want Flock
[ A] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
M T Sabha,
I am writing
You to cut Al ties with Flock.
Flock puts our whole community at risk. We do not want to live in a surveillance society.
Rob Muthiah
Pasadena, California 91103
Sabha, Tamer
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Miki Brewster < [email protected] >
Friday, May 15, 2026 11:51 AM
Sabha, Tamer
Ban Flock From Pasadena
[ 1 J CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
MT Sabha,
Pasadena City Council, please remove Flock cams from our city.
I live here in Pasadena. I should be able to get gas or walk through my neighborhood without my image being catalogued in some database that then gets sold out to whichever agency wants it.
At a time when I feel like my privacy is being eroded on every front, I would like to keep what little I have.
Thank you.
Miki Brewster
Pasadena, California 91106
1 Sabha, Tamer
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
<[email protected]>
Friday, May 15, 2026 6:37 PM
Sabha, Tamer
Flock WAY THE HECK out of Pasadena
A ] CAUTION: This email was delivered from the Internet. Do not click links or open attachments unless you fcnowthe content is safe. Report phish using the Phish Alert Button. For more information about the Phish Alert Button view article "KB0011474" on the DolT portal.
M T Sabha,
I urge Pasadena City Council to put safety over sun/eillance and cut ties with Flock.
Flock ALPR cameras are being used for indiscriminate surveillance, tracking and targeting of countless individuals. While Flock, law enforcement and city government tout the benefits of automated license plate readers for public safety, in reality it endangers everyone - in particular immigrants and their famiiies, people of color, people seeking sensitive healthcare, and the many exercising civil liberties like free speech.
Flock's indiscriminate sun/eillance is in conflict with constitutional protections and numerous civil liberties groups such as the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation arguing that the technology infringes on Americans' right to privacy under the Fourth Amendment. Despite repeated attempts from Flock to reform their system, it is apparent ALPR is problematic, insecure and can have devastating consequences for innocent individuals. Academics, researchers and experts overwhelmingly agree that there's a lack of evidence linking flock to crime reduction rates.
There is overwhelming evidence of abuse and misuse ofALPR systems across the country - and Pasadena's ALPR systems are no exception. Pasadena was notified that it was sharing ALPR information across the country, the city lacked ALPR data retention restrictions, and many residents have expressed privacy concerns over the years. Despite this, Pasadena Police says Fiock is a "useful tool" - yes, it is useful in diverting resources thatwouid otherwise go towards community oriented public safety solutions that don't infringe on our civil iiberties.
1 Pasadena should join dozens of cities across the country who have ended their contracts with Flock, removed cameras and rejected any ALPR repiacements such as Los Aitos Hills, Mountain View, Santa Clara County, Santa Cruz, and others.
Pasadena, choose your constituents. Restore trust, restore accountability and uphold our constitutional rights. End all ties with Flock now.
mchitaly@;
)
2