Cities Index.
AR 26 PPT POWER POINT PRESENTATION

Pasadena City Council
June 8, 2026

Document
AR 26 PPT POWER POINT PRESENTATION
Meeting
June 8, 2026
Body
Pasadena City Council
Original file
11.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on ww2.cityofpasadena.net. That file is the official record.

Planning & Community Development

UNCODIFIED DELAYED EFFECTUATION

ORDINANCE RELATED TO
SENATE BILL 79
City Council
June 8, 2026
Planning & Community Development
Background
• Introduced on January 15, 2025 by Senator Scott
Wiener and signed by Governor Gavin Newsom on
October 10, 2025.
• Provides for certain housing development projects
when within 1/4 to 1/2 mile of a Transit-Oriented
Development (TOD) stop.
• Allows a transit agency (Metro, Foothill Transit, etc.) to adopt its own TOD development standards for district-
owned property within 1/2 mile of a TOD stop.
• Takes effect on July 1, 2026.
2 Planning & Community Development
Housing, Homelessness, and Planning
Committee
> May 7, 2026: Staff presented background information and options to implement SB 79.
> Staff outlined a recommendation to adopt an Uncodified Delayed Effectuation Ordinance to temporarily exempt certain sites. > The Committee was supportive of Option 2, as recommended by staff, and directed staff to:
 Provide additional variations as it relates to delaying implementation to RM zones, including:

1. Not delaying implementation to any RM zones;

2. Only delaying implementation for RM-12 and RM-16 zones; and

3. Delaying implementation to all RM zones; and provide accompanying maps to demonstrate the variations; and
 Determine if an Urgency Ordinance can be adopted.
3 Planning & Community Development
Planning Commission Action
> May 13, 2026: Planning Commission considered the proposed Uncodified Delayed Effectuation Ordinance to implement the staff recommendation, Option 2;
> The Commission considered the maps demonstrating the RM implementation options requested by HHPC; and
> The Commission recommended, by a vote of 5-1, that the City Council approve the staff recommendation, including delaying implementation in all RM zones.
> The Commission also asked staff to return with future discussions on preparing a Transit Oriented Development Alternative Plan (TODAP) and was generally supportive of a TODAP.
> Staff is currently compiling data, conducting analysis, and tracking new legislation that would amend SB 79 to possibly prepare a TODAP. 4 Planning & Community Development
5 TOD Stops: Metro A-Line
All stations meet
the definition of a
Tier 2 TOD stop.

Planning & Community Development
6 TOD Stops: Metro A-Line

Planning & Community Development
Eligibility Thresholds
• Project site must be zoned for residential, mixed-use, or commercial development.
• Project shall include a minimum of five housing units. • Project must have a minimum density of 30 dwelling units per acre (du/ac).
• Average proposed unit size shall not exceed 1,750
habitable square feet.
• For mixed-use projects, a minimum of 66% of the total square footage must be for residential purposes.
7 Planning & Community Development
SB 79 Limitations
• Cannot be applied to projects proposing any hotel, motel, or similar uses.
• Cannot be applied to a site containing more than two units where the development would require demolition of existing rent-or-price control units occupied by tenants within the past seven years.
• Cannot be applied to a site previously used for more than two rent-or-price controlled units that were demolished within seven years before submittal of SB 79 project application. • Projects with 10 or more units must comply with the City's local inclusionary requirements.
• Imposes prevailing wage and other labor requirements on buildings over 85 feet in height.
8 Planning & Community Development
SB 79 Limitations
• Any proposed development would still remain subject to:
• Development standards of the Zoning Code and any applicable Specific Plan.
• City’s Objective Design Standards (projects with more than 48 du/ac) and applicable City of Gardens Design Standards in RM zones.
• City’s Design Review process.
• City’s applicable demolition and anti-displacement standards. This would include complying with the Certificate of Appropriateness process and Tenant Protection Ordinance.
• California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
• All requirements of the California Building Code, Fire Code, etc. 9 Planning & Community Development
SB 79 Development Standards
Location Tier 2 Development Standards
per SB 79
Adjacent to a TOD stop
(within 200 feet*)
• Height: 85 feet
• Density: 140 du/ac
• Residential FAR: 4.0
Within ¼-mile* of a TOD stop
• Height: 65 feet
• Density: 100 du/ac
• Residential FAR: 3.0
Between ¼- and ½-mile* of a
TOD stop
• Height: 55 feet
• Density: 80 du/ac
• Residential FAR: 2.5
10 * Distance measured from the pedestrian entrance(s) of a TOD stop.

Planning & Community Development
Local Implementation Options
• Various options to implement SB 79, including:

1. No local action (implement SB 79 as-is).

2. Adopt ordinance to delay effectuation of SB 79 for eligible sites.

3. Adopt ordinance consisting of a Transit Oriented Development Alternative Plan.
• Ordinances need to be submitted to the Department of
Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review.
11 Planning & Community Development
Local Implementation Options
• Option 1: No Local Action - Implementation of SB 79:
> No action to be taken by the City and implement in its entirety on July 1, 2026.
> City may adopt an ordinance codifying the SB 79 development standards.
> Avoids need for immediate action but does not pause eligibility for any sites.
12 Planning & Community Development
Local Implementation Options
• Option 2: Delayed Effectuation for Eligible Sites:
> Allows cities to temporarily exempt individual sites and TOD zones meeting certain criteria, effectively “delaying effectuation” up to one year following the adoption of the next Housing Element (approximately 2031).
> The following may be temporarily exempt:
 An individual site in any TOD zone, if:
» The site’s current zoning permits at least 50% of total density and FAR; » The site includes a historic resource designated as of January 1, 2025, on a local register.
 Any individual site(s) within a specific TOD zone, if:
» At least 33% of sites in the TOD zone currently allow at least 50% of the density and FAR granted by SB 79; and
» All sites within the TOD zone cumulatively allow for at least 75% of the aggregate density allowed by SB 79.
13 Planning & Community Development
Local Implementation Options
• Option 3: TOD Alternative Plan (TODAP)
> City may be adopted via an ordinance, zoning overlay, adoption of specific plan, or adoption/implementation of the Housing Element at any time.
> TOD Alternative Plan may include:
 Shifting capacity within a TOD zone and from one TOD zone to another provided the capacity is reduced by no more than 50% in any individual TOD zone and the overall capacity for all TOD zones within each jurisdiction is maintained;
 Exempting sites with a historic resource designated as of January 1, 2025 on a local register, provided the sites do not cumulatively exceed 10% of the eligible area of any TOD zone;
 Ensuring that the minimum density of individual sites shall not be less than 30 du/ac and the maximum shall not exceed 200% of what is permitted. 14 Planning & Community Development
Staff Recommendation
• Staff recommends proceeding with Option 2 (Delayed
Effectuation):
> An Uncodified Delayed Effectuation Ordinance to temporarily exempt the following sites from SB 79;
 For all six TOD zones;
» Sites with historic resources designated as of January 1, 2025, on a local register.
 Within the Memorial Park, Del Mar, and Lake TOD zones:
» Sites with historic resources designated as of January 1, 2025, on the state register.
» Sites zoned Multi-Family Residential (RM-12,-16, -32, and -48) and Single- Family Residential (RS).
» Sites located within specific plan areas with a density of 48 du/ac or less. 15 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 – Delayed Effectuation and
Excluded Sites + Rent/Price Controlled
16 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 – Delayed Effectuation and
Excluded Sites + Rent/Price Controlled
17 Planning & Community Development
Recommendation
• It is recommended that the City Council:
> Find that the proposed action is exempt from CEQA;
> Adopt the Uncodified Delayed Effectuation Ordinance to delay implementation of SB 79 for sites identified in Option 2; > Conduct first reading of the Uncodified Delayed Effectuation Ordinance; and
> Adopt the Findings for the Zoning Code Amendment.
18 Planning & Community Development

UNCODIFIED DELAYED EFFECTUATION

ORDINANCE RELATED TO
SENATE BILL 79
City Council
June 8, 2026
Planning & Community Development
Next Steps and Timeline
• June 15, 2026, conduct second reading of the ordinance. • June 18, 2026, effective date of Uncodified Delayed
Effectuation Ordinance.
• July 1, 2026, effective date of SB 79.
20 Planning & Community Development
Sites with Historic Resources on the
Local Register
21 Planning & Community Development
Sites with Historic Resources on the
State and National Register
22 Planning & Community Development
Sites Zoned RS, RM, and SP
23 Planning & Community Development
Option 2
24 Planning & Community Development
Option 2
25 Planning & Community Development
Option 2
26 Planning & Community Development
Option 2
27 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 – Delayed Effectuation
28 Planning & Community Development
Rent and Price Controlled Sites
29 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 – Delayed Effectuation
30 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 – Delayed Effectuation and
Excluded Sites
31 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 (Excluding RM-48) – Delayed
Effectuation and Excluded Sites
32 Planning & Community Development
Option 2 (Excluding RM-32 & RM-48) –
Delayed Effectuation and Excluded Sites
33 Planning & Community Development
Density Examples (48-60 du/ac)
34 Villa Gardens – 842 E. Villa St. (50 du/ac) The Maryland Apts. - 80 N.

Euclid Ave. (52 du/ac)
250 S. De Lacey Ave. (58 du/ac)
Planning & Community Development
Density Examples (60-87 du/ac)
35 Heritage Square South – 710 N. Fair Oaks Ave. (63 du/ac) Bell Pasadena – 3330 E. Foothill Blvd. (66 du/ac) 913 Boston Court (80 du/ac) 75 W. Walnut St. (74 du/ac)
Planning & Community Development
Density Examples (87-100 du/ac)
36 The Barcelona – 85 N. Madison Ave. (92 du/ac)
The Brantwood – 88 N. Oakland Ave. (90 du/ac)
Planning & Community Development
Density Examples (100+ du/ac)
37 164 Chestnut St. (104 du/ac)
277 N. El Molino Ave. (106 du/ac)
Planning & Community Development
Lake Station: RM-48
38 Planning & Community Development
Lake Station: RM-48
39 Planning & Community Development
Lake Station: RM-48
40 Planning & Community Development
Del Mar Station: RM-48
41 Planning & Community Development
Lake Station: RM-32
42 Planning & Community Development
Lake Station: RM-32
43 Planning & Community Development
Del Mar Station: RM-32
44 Planning & Community Development
Memorial Park Station: RM-32
45 Planning & Community Development
Memorial Park Station : RM-32
46 Planning & Community Development
Existing and Required Unit Capacity
Station A rea Fillmore D el M ar M emorial Park La k e A llen Sierra M adre V illa T otal General Plan 12,324 17,898 22,409 26,757 9,881 17,629 106,898 SB79 (SB79 DU - Excluded Properties) 28,369 21,947 24,461 30,590 34,218 31,629 171,214 Gap (GP-SB79) (16,045) (4,049) (2,052) (3,833) (24,337) (14,000) (64,316) 75% capacity 21,277 16,460 18,346 22,943 25,664 23,722 128,411 47 Excluded Properties Fillmore D el M ar M emorial La k e A llen Sierra M adre V illa Total L ocal Historic Property 2,834 945 852 1,865 1,400 1,551 9,448 R ent Stabilized 5,084 3,172 3,184 10,611 5,764 897 28,712 A ffordable Units - 1,270 53 1,205 238 - 2,766 Historic + R ent Stabilized + A ffordable - 115 - - - - 115 Historic Property + Rent Stabilized 36 41 34 213 142 - 466 GP = Institutional - 42 - 284 - - 326 GP = Open Space - - - - - 203 203 Z = PS - - - 40 - - 40 Z = OS - - - - - - - T otal 7,954 5,586 4,123 14,218 7,544 2,651 42,076 Planning & Community Development
SB 79 and 710 Stub
48 Planning & Community Development
SB 79 and 710 Stub
49 Planning & Community Development
Eligibility Thresholds
• The project must be within ½ mile of a Tier 1 or Tier 2 TOD stop to be eligible for SB 79:
> Tier 1: a TOD stop within an urban transit county served by heavy rail transit or very high frequency commuter rail.
 None in Pasadena.
> Tier 2: a TOD stop within an urban transit county served by light rail transit, by high-frequency commuter rail, or by bus rapid transit stations.
 All six Metro A Line stations are Tier 2.
 The North Hollywood to Pasadena Transit Corridor (BRT) rapid transit stops proposed in Pasadena does not qualify.
50 Planning & Community Development
Background – Additional Legislation
• Related bills introduced clarify and provide technical changes:
> SB 677 (Wiener) - clarifying language related to definition for “high-frequency commuter rail.”
> AB 2576 (Harabedian) - excludes a contributing site within a historic district included on the State Historic Resources Inventory designated before January 1, 2025, and a parcel individually listed as a historical resource included on the State Historic Resources Inventory designated before
January 1, 2025.
• Both bills are currently in the State Legislature and have not been signed by the Governor.
51 Planning & Community Development
Background
• Actions by the City:
> April 28, 2025 – Opposition letter sent to Governor Newsom. > September 16, 2025 – Second letter sent to Governor Newsom. > December 30, 2025 – Third letter sent to Governor Newsom. • Local Efforts:
> Informational items at Legislative Policy Committee (June 3, 2025 and August 20, 2025).
> Informational items at Planning Commission (August 13, 2025 and February 11, 2026).
> Ongoing working group with the cities of Burbank and Glendale. > Discussions with staff from Cities of Los Angeles and South Pasadena.
> Monthly meetings with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments.
52 Planning & Community Development
Development Standards –
Transit Agencies
• Transit agency may propose an SB 79 project on land
they own within ½-mile of a TOD Station, subject to the following:
> Project site is adjacent to or within ½ mile of a TOD stop it operates and was owned by the agency prior to January 1, 2026.  Parcels were acquired through eminent domain prior to July 1, 2025. > Minimum of 50% of total square footage must be for residential purposes. No portion may include a hotel or similar use. • May adopt zoning standards consistent with SB 79.
> Minimum and maximum requirements for density, height and FAR and a list of approved residential and nonresidential uses. > Minimum density shall not be less than 30 du/ac and the maximum shall not exceed 200% of what is permitted under SB 79. 53 Planning & Community Development
Transit Agencies – Metro-Owned
Parcels
309 N Michigan
305 E. Walnut St.
no address
130 Sierra Madre Villa
54 Planning & Community Development
State Density Bonus Law
55 Location Minimum Density for
Additional Concessions Additional Concessions
Within ¼-mile* of
TOD stop 75 du/ac • 3 additional concessions
for projects with extremely
low-income housing
• 2 for projects with very low-
income housing
• 1 for projects with low-
income housing
Within ¼ and ½
mile* of TOD stop 60 du/ac
* Distance measured from the pedestrian entrance(s) of a TOD stop.

← All documents from this meeting