ATTACHMENT D
Our Pasadena – Putting the Plan in Motion
Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update
Addendum to the
Pasadena General Plan
Environmental Impact Report
DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
Prepared for:
The City of Pasadena
Planning & Community Development Department
175 N. Garfield Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91101
Prepared by:
300 S. Grand Avenue, 9th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
September 2026
Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Table of Contents Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026 Page i
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ......................................................... 1
1.1 Applicability and Use of an Addendum................................. 2
1.2 Format of This Addendum.................................................... 3
1.3 Summary of Findings ........................................................... 4
1.4 Lead Agency and Discretionary Approvals........................... 4 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................... 5
2.1 Introduction........................................................................... 5
2.2 Project Location.................................................................... 6
2.3 Project Objectives ................................................................ 9
2.4 Description of the Proposed Project ................................... 11
2.4.1 Relationship to 2015 General Plan..................................... 12
2.4.2 Relationship to 2002 Fair Oaks-Orange Grove Specific Plan 15 2.4.3 Proposed Specific Plan Updates ........................................ 15 CHAPTER 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ................................ 1 I. AESTHETICS....................................................................... 3 II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.......................................... 6 III. AIR QUALITY..................................................................... 15 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.............................................. 24 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES................................................. 33 VI. ENERGY ............................................................................ 42 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ..................................................... 46 VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .................................... 56 IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS..................... 61 X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.............................. 71 XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING.............................................. 81 XII. MINERAL RESOURCES.................................................... 91 XIII. NOISE................................................................................ 94 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING........................................ 102 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES ......................................................... 107 XVI. RECREATION.................................................................. 111 XVII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ........................................ 117 XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ............................. 128 Environmental Determination...................................................... 138 CHAPTER 4 MITIGATION MEASURES.................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 5 LIST OF PREPARERS ......................................................................... 1 Table of Contents Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026 Page ii
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Regional Location Map .......................................................................... 2-6 Figure 2 – Pasadena’s Specific Plan Update Areas................................................ 2-7 Figure 3 – Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Boundary and General Plan Land Use Designations ......................................................................................................... 2-12 Figure 4 – Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Subareas............................................ 2-14 Figure 5 – Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Zoning Districts................................... 2-15 Table of Contents Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026 Page iii
Acronyms and Abbreviations
AB Assembly Bill
BMP Best Management Practice
CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CARB California Air Resources Board
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
CG General Commercial
Checklist Environmental Checklist Form
City City of Pasadena
CL Limited Commercial
CMP Congestion Management Program
du/ac dwelling units per acre
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FAR
FOOG
floor area ratio
Fair Oaks Orange Grove
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHG greenhouse gas
GP EIR 2015 Pasadena General Plan Environmental Impact Report HRA health risk assessment
I-210 Interstate 210
IS Initial Study
LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
LOS level of service
LTS Less than Significant Impact
LTS-M Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MERV Maximum efficiency rating value
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MU Mixed Use
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NI No Impact
O3 ozone
OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PFD Pasadena Fire Department
PM2.5 fine particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter PM10 respirable particulate matter ten microns or less in diameter PPD Pasadena Police Department
PPL Pasadena Public Library
PUSD Pasadena Unified School District
PWP Pasadena Department of Water and Power
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Table of Contents Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026 Page iv
RM Multifamily Residential
RTP/SCS Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy SB Senate Bill
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SOC Statement of Overriding Considerations
S-U Significant and Unavoidable Impact
T-BACTs best available control technologies for toxics
TACs toxic air contaminants
TDF Travel Demand Forecasting
VMT vehicle miles traveled
VOC volatile organic compound
VT vehicles traveled
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
CHAPTER 1
PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
The City of Pasadena (City) has prepared this Addendum to the 2015 Pasadena General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GP EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2013091009) to address the potential site-specific environmental impacts associated with the update to the Fair Oaks-Orange Grove Specific Plan (proposed project or project). This Addendum is prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) (Cal. Public Resources Code Section 21000, et. seq., as amended) and its implementing guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., Title 14, Section 15000 et. seq., 2016). This Addendum has been prepared and will be processed consistent with CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., Title 14, Section 15162 and Section 15164).
In 2015, the City updated the Pasadena General Plan and prepared the GP EIR to analyze potential citywide impacts, broad policy alternatives, and programmatic mitigation measures associated with the update of the Pasadena General Plan and specific plan amendments, which updated development caps within each specific plan area. The changes focused on the Land Use and Mobility Elements and the Land Use Diagram. The update also included the consolidation of optional elements into required elements of the General Plan. The Land Use and Mobility Elements, together with the other General Plan elements, guide the overall physical development of the City through horizon year 2035. The GP EIR is a Program EIR as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15161, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 and prepared in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168. The Final GP EIR was certified and the findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC), and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) adopted by the City Council on August 17, 2015 (Resolution No. 9451).
Following the adoption of the General Plan Update and certification of the GP EIR, future discretionary actions include specific plan updates and amendments and zone changes to provide consistency with the General Plan. Therefore, the City is updating seven existing specific plans and creating one new specific plan to align with and implement the updated General Plan. The specific plan updates focus on establishing neighborhood-specific design and land-use goals resulting in new development standards and guidelines that will help shape the City’s major commercial and mixeduse areas. The Fair Oaks Orange Grove (FOOG) Specific Plan is one of the seven existing specific plans to be updated as part of the General Plan Implementation Program.
Per the GP EIR, future discretionary review may rely on analysis provided in the GP EIR for the purpose of tiering and/or streamlining. The purpose of tiering is to use the analysis of general matters contained in a broader EIR (such as the GP EIR) with later CEQA documents on narrower or more site specific projects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152). Tiering serves to reduce repetitive analysis and provide subsequent site specific analysis at a time when it is meaningful. Tiering is common and appropriate when the sequence of analysis is from a General Plan EIR to a program Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
of lesser scope, such as a specific plan (CEQA Guidelines Section 15152[b]).
Therefore, CEQA review required for the City’s eight specific plan areas may tier from the GP EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15152.
1.1 Applicability and Use of an Addendum
Per the GP EIR, CEQA review required for the City’s specific plan areas may tier from the GP EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15152. In addition, per CEQA Guidelines Section 15152(h), other methods to streamline the environmental review process also exist. These methods include the use of a Program EIR (i.e., GP EIR) for later activities (CEQA Guidelines Section 15168) and preparing an addendum (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164). Lead agencies have discretion regarding which method may apply and should be used.
Under the process described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), later activities in the program must be examined in the light of the Program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. No additional documentation is required for subsequent proposed actions (e.g., updating of the City’s specific plans to implement the General Plan) if the examination determines that the potential impacts were within the scope of the GP EIR, and subsequent proposed actions implement appropriate feasible mitigation measures identified in the MMRP that accompanies the Final EIR. Whether a later activity is within the scope of a Program EIR is a factual question that the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record. Factors that a lead agency may consider in making that determination include, but are not limited to, consistency of the later activity with the type of allowable land use, overall planned density and building intensity, geographic area analyzed for environmental impacts and covered infrastructure as described in the Program EIR. If the agency finds that pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent EIR would be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the program EIR, and no new environmental document would be required.
The conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR are:
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
3. New information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City, as the lead agency, has prepared this Addendum to confirm that none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and Public Resources Code Section 21166(c) have been triggered. For a proposed modified project or implementing activity, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 provides that an Addendum to a previously certified Final EIR may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary, or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. The City must consider the whole of the data presented in the GP EIR with the information provided in this Addendum and the previously adopted MMRP.
1.2 Format of This Addendum
The previously certified GP EIR serves as the primary environmental compliance document for the project, and this Addendum provides minor changes and additions to the GP EIR. This Addendum should be considered with the full text of the previously certified 2015 GP EIR. All applicable mitigation measures from the GP EIR would be applicable to the proposed project and, therefore, are incorporated by reference into this Addendum. This Addendum relies on the use of an Environmental Checklist Form (Checklist), as suggested in Section 15063(d)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Per the CEQA Guidelines, an addendum does not need to be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the Final EIR prior to making a decision on the project.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
1.3 Summary of Findings
Based upon the Checklist prepared for the proposed project and supporting responses (see Chapter 3), adoption of the update to the FOOG Specific Plan would not result in substantial changes requiring major revisions to the previously certified GP EIR.
Further, the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts that were not discussed in the GP EIR or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts. No new mitigation measures are required for the proposed project. Since only minor changes and additions are required to the GP EIR, and none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 or CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a-b) or Section 15163 requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR have occurred, the City finds that the preparation of an addendum to the GP EIR is the appropriate CEQA documentation for the proposed project and that the proposed project is within the scope of the GP EIR.
1.4 Lead Agency and Discretionary Approvals
This Addendum and the previously certified GP EIR are intended to serve as the environmental documentation for the changes being proposed under the FOOG Specific Plan Update. The City of Pasadena is the lead agency under CEQA and maintains authority to approve the Addendum for the adoption of the FOOG Specific Plan Update. Discretionary approvals being sought as part of the FOOG Specific Plan Update include the following:
• Acknowledgement of this Addendum to the GP EIR and that no subsequent CEQA document is required;
• General Plan Land Use Map amendment to update the land use categories depicted on the Land Use Diagram as proposed in the FOOG Specific Plan Update. This amendment would also update the Land Use Diagram to reflect the recommended FOOG Specific Plan boundary;
• General Plan text amendment to align the plan boundary indicated on the General Plan Land Use Element with the boundary proposed for the FOOG Specific Plan area. Under this amendment, a few areas would be removed from the current plan, while additional parcels would be incorporated into the area; • Specific Plan Amendment for the FOOG Specific Plan Update; • Zoning Map amendment to replace zoning district designations indicated on the Zoning Map with the proposed FOOG Specific Plan zoning districts and subareas, and zoning assignment of parcels that are proposed additions to the plan area;
• Zoning Code text amendment to replace existing permitted uses and standards in the Zoning Code with the uses and standards proposed in the FOOG Specific Plan to implement the plan;
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
• Zoning Code Amendment to incorporate a new FOOG Specific Plan ordinance to regulate zoning consistent with the General Plan, replacing the existing Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 17.33; and
• Any other minor technical updates necessary for the General Plan Implementation Program/Specific Plan Updates project.
CHAPTER 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 Introduction
On August 18, 2015, the City certified the Pasadena General Plan (GP) Final Environmental Impact Report (GP EIR). The GP EIR analyzed potential citywide impacts, broad policy alternatives, and programmatic mitigation measures. The GP EIR analyzed the update of the GP and specific plan amendments, which were limited to specific plan boundary changes and updated development caps within each of the City’s eight specific plan areas. The changes focused on the Land Use and Mobility Elements and the Land Use Diagram. The update also included the consolidation of optional elements into required elements of the General Plan. The Land Use and Mobility Elements, together with the other General Plan elements, guide the overall physical development of the City through horizon year 2035.
The City is updating seven existing specific plans and creating one new specific plan to align with the updated 2015 General Plan. The specific plan updates focus on establishing neighborhood-specific design and land-use goals resulting in new Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
development standards and guidelines that will help shape the City’s major commercial and mixed-use areas. The FOOG Specific Plan is one of the seven existing specific plans to be updated as part of the General Plan Implementation Program; the original FOOG Specific Plan was adopted in 2002.
The purpose of this Addendum to the GP EIR is to evaluate the environmental effects associated with the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update and to determine whether these impacts are consistent with the evaluation presented in the GP EIR in compliance with CEQA (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.).
2.2 Project Location
The FOOG Specific Plan boundary extends along a 2-mile segment of North Fair Oaks Avenue between the I-210 Freeway to the south and Montana Street to the north, as well as a 0.9-mile segment of Orange Grove Boulevard between Lincoln Avenue and Los Robles Avenue. The specific plan area is generally bounded by Maple Avenue to the south; Lincoln Avenue, Morton Avenue, Sunset Avenue and Linder Alley to the west; the city limits at Altadena to the north; and Raymond Avenue and Oakland Avenue to the east. The Metro A Line and I-210 freeway are located just outside the existing FOOG Specific Plan boundary to the south.
Figure 1 shows the general location of the existing FOOG Specific Plan area within the region. Figure 2 shows the FOOG Specific Plan Update area among the general locations of the City’s eight Specific Plans that make up the General Plan Implementation Program.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Figure 1 - Regional Location Map
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Figure 2 - Pasadena’s Specific Plan Update Areas
*Specific Plan Boundaries are Subject to Change
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
2.3 Project Objectives
The primary goals and objectives identified in the 2015 GP EIR include:
• Objective 1: Provide a new Land Use Element that targets growth to serve community needs and enhance the quality of life. Direct higher density development away from residential neighborhoods and into the Central District, Transit Villages, and Neighborhood Villages.
• Objective 2: Reduce vehicle miles traveled for the City and the region by providing a diverse housing stock, job opportunities, and exciting districts with commercial and recreational uses, and transit opportunities in the Central District, Transit Villages, and Neighborhood Villages.
• Objective 3: Ensure new development builds upon Pasadena’s tradition of strong sense of place, great neighborhoods, gardens, plazas, parks, and trees. • Objective 4: Preserve Pasadena’s historic resources by ensuring that new development is compatible with and differentiated from existing historic resources.
• Objective 5: Achieve economic vitality and fiscal responsibility by providing jobs, services, revenues, and opportunities with a diverse economic base. • Objective 6: Provide a General Plan that establishes the goals and policies to create a socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable community.
Provide safe, well-designed, accessible, and human-scale residential and commercial areas where people of all ages can live, work, and play, including neighborhood parks, urban open spaces, and the equitable distribution of public and private recreational facilities.
• Objective 7: Create a cultural, scientific, corporate, entertainment, and educational center for the region. Provide long-term growth opportunities for existing institutions and foster a healthy economy to attract new cultural, scientific, corporate, entertainment, and educational institutions. • Objective 8: Create mobility guidelines and multimodal metrics consistent with Senate Bill (SB) 743. Incorporate new goals, policies, and programs that balance multiple modes of transportation and meet the requirements of the Complete Streets Act.
• Objective 9: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and encourage walking, biking, transit, and other alternatives to motor vehicles by creating strategies to encourage nonautomotive travel and protect residential neighborhoods Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 32, SB 375, and SB 743. • Objective 10: Reconcile General Plan buildout projections with regional and subregional estimates for growth creating consistency with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
• Objective 11: Incorporate housing sites identified in the adopted Housing Element with the Land Use Element.
In accordance with the GP EIR goals and objectives, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update includes the following vision statement:
Vision Statement: Fair Oaks Avenue and Orange Grove Boulevard will offer a variety of housing options and flexible commercial, recreational, and community-building spaces around active, people-oriented corridors that celebrate the neighborhood’s rich history.
Vision Objectives:
• Complete Neighborhood: A mix of diverse uses that provide residents with their daily needs and convenient connections around the community and region. • A Sense of Place: Placemaking through new and existing gathering spaces, public art and community events that build on the area’s history and identity. • New & Affordable Housing: High-quality housing that works for modern households, affordable to people at various income levels and sized to fit different families.
• Walkable Streets: Safe and comfortable mobility options for those getting around without a car, with streets shared by all modes of transportation. • Local Businesses: Locally owned and operated businesses that add to the economic vibrancy as well as the historic character of the neighborhood. • Activity Centers: Lively intersections along the primary boulevards with neighborhood destinations, including retail, restaurants and public green space.
• Green Community: A lush public realm with mature shade trees and landscaping that fosters sustainability, cooling, and climate resilience. • Environmental Justice: Equal access, fair treatment and meaningful involvement for all people, especially minority populations and vulnerable communities.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
2.4 Description of the Proposed Project
The proposed project would update the FOOG Specific Plan to implement the General Plan. As part of the proposed project, a General Plan Land Use Diagram amendment would be adopted so that the Land Use Diagram is consistent with the boundaries and land use categories proposed in the FOOG Specific Plan Update. The purpose of this Addendum to the GP EIR is to evaluate the environmental effects associated with the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update as compared to the evaluation presented in the GP EIR.
This project proposes to update the following components of the FOOG Specific Plan to bring it into alignment with the General Plan:
• Specific Plan Area boundary
• Vision, objectives, goals and policies
• Zoning districts regulating allowed land uses
• Density and intensity of development
• Height and/or overall scale of buildings and structures • Distance of buildings and structures to the property line (setbacks/stepbacks) • Urban design standards
• Vehicle access and parking standards
• Types and amount of open space and landscaping requirements • Public realm standards (sidewalks, parkways and street trees) • Implementation programs
Updates to the FOOG Specific Plan primarily focus on refining and/or establishing land uses and zoning districts, as well as objective development standards to achieve the goals and vision of the General Plan. This includes building upon the area’s existing strength as a neighborhood corridor with a mix of uses, walkable areas with shopping, restaurants, offices, and housing. Updates to the FOOG Specific Plan seek to stimulate housing and commercial development, encourage pedestrian-oriented retail and services, support pedestrian mobility, and target housing opportunities in a contextually sensitive manner. Through incremental development, the Plan would strengthen Fair Oaks Avenue’s role as a local “main street”, providing a wider variety of amenities, services, and housing options to residents, employees, and visitors. To support the land use and zoning district updates, the FOOG Specific Plan Update includes urban design standards related to scale, frontages, open space, and parking to encourage quality architecture that enhances the community’s unique character.
Standards for the public realm are also included in the FOOG Specific Plan Update to address and regulate pedestrian infrastructure and amenities to support a safe, accessible, and comfortable pedestrian experience, including sidewalks, parkways, and street trees. The FOOG Specific Plan Update does not address public roadway modifications or improvements, which are within the purview of other City documents.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
2.4.1 Relationship to 2015 General Plan
The 2015 General Plan represented an update to the City General Plan Elements, including the Mobility Element and the Land Use Element, which guide the overall physical development of the City. The 2015 General Plan also established new development caps for each of the Specific Plan areas, including the FOOG Specific Plan. However, the General Plan leaves the more detailed development and design standards to be identified in the Specific Plan. The proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update establishes the regulatory tools needed to implement the General Plan through the identification of development and design standards suited to the FOOG Specific Plan area. As this document compares the environmental impacts of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update to those analyzed in the GP EIR, it is important to note the following:
• The proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update does not modify or change the intent of the adopted General Plan. Rather, the updates to the FOOG Specific Plan are being proposed to achieve the goals and vision of the General Plan by adding the necessary regulatory tools for implementation. Additionally, a Zoning Code amendment would be required to incorporate a new FOOG Specific Plan ordinance to regulate zoning consistent with the General Plan, replacing the existing Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 17.34. • The General Plan established land use and corresponding density and intensity ranges but did not establish development and/or design standards (e.g., height limits, setbacks, etc.). The FOOG Specific Plan Update adds more specific standards to implement the General Plan Land Use categories for the FOOG Specific Plan area. It provides those development and design standards through zoning districts and land use regulations, thereby, further regulating the land uses studied in the GP EIR.
• The proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update follows the plan area boundary with minor revisions noted below, and sets densities and intensity standards which are within the General Plan ranges with the exception of the following recommended amendments:
o Add two parcels near the intersection of Orange Grove Boulevard and Cypress Avenue (AIN 5726-010-041 and 5726-010-042) and update the land use designation from Med-High Density Residential (0-32 du/ac) to Low Mixed-Use (0-32 du/ac and 0-1.0 FAR).
o Add a portion of the parcel north of Orange Grove Boulevard between Lincoln Avenue and Manzanita Avenue (AIN 5726-018-095) and update the land use designation from Low-Med Residential (0-12 du/ac) to Low Mixed-Use (0-32 du/ac and 0-1.0 FAR).
o Update the land use designation for selected parcels along Fair Oaks Avenue between Orange Grove Boulevard and Yale Street from Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Medium Mixed-Use (0-87 du/ac and 0-2.25 FAR) to Low-Med Mixed Use (0-48 du/ac and 0-1.75 FAR). Add a parcel east of Fair Oaks Avenue (AIN 5726-003-032) and update the land use designation from Low-Med Density Residential (0-6 du/ac) to Low-Med Mixed Use (0-48 du/ac and 0-1.75 FAR).
o Add the parcel on Painter Street west of Wheeler Lane (AIN 5725-001- 001) and update the land use designation from Low-Med Density Residential (0-12 du/ac) to Low-Med Mixed-Use (0-48 du/ac and 0-
1.75 FAR).
o Update the land use designation for parcels on the west side of Raymond Avenue near Orange Grove Boulevard from Medium MixedUse (0-87 du/ac and 0-2.25 FAR) to Low-Medium Mixed-Use (0-48 du/ac and 0-1.75 FAR).
o Update the land use designation for parcels east of Fair Oaks Avenue between Claremont Street and Washington Boulevard from Medium Density Residential (0-16 du/ac) to Low-Medium Mixed-Use (0-48 du/ac and 0-1.75 FAR).
o Update the land use designation for Low Mixed-Use (0-32 du/ac and 0-
1.0 FAR), Medium Density Residential (0-16 du/ac) and Low Commercial (0-1.0 FAR) parcels north of Washington Boulevard to Low-Med Mixed-Use (0-48 du/ac and 0-1.75 FAR.
• The proposed FOOG Specific Plan establishes an overall vision for the plan area, the policies and standards apply specifically to private development and adjacent sidewalks.
Figure 3 illustrates the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update boundary and General Plan land use designations within the Specific Plan area. Each designation has a corresponding density and intensity as defined by the General Plan.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Figure 3 – Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Boundary and General Plan Land Use Designations
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
2.4.2 Relationship to 2002 Fair Oaks-Orange Grove Specific Plan The existing Fair Oaks-Orange Grove Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council in 2002. The 2015 GP and corresponding GP EIR included some policies carried over from the 2002 Specific Plan (2002 SP). The purpose of the 2002 SP was designed to revitalize the area into a pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use community. Adopted to improve local quality of life, it focuses on enhancing commercial, residential, and institutional spaces while fostering a, connected neighborhood center. As such, the development and design standards listed in the 2002 SP are applicable to the parcels in the FOOG Specific Plan area until the FOOG Specific Plan Update being analyzed in this Addendum is adopted.
The proposed updates to the FOOG Specific Plan would build on the progress initiated by the 2002 SP and further the vision set by the 2015 General Plan by establishing land uses and zoning districts for a more cohesive approach to mixed-use development and public realm connectivity to support transit usage. The specific plan land uses organize land use types by zoning districts while development standards such as height restrictions, density limitations, parking requirements, public realm, etc. are regulated by location-based maps. The primary changes between the 2002 SP and the FOOG Specific Plan Update are updated policies and standards that align with the General Plan and address current and future community needs, opportunities, and challenges.
2.4.3 Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Updates
The vision and goals of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update are implemented through three sets of tools set forth in the FOOG Specific Plan. These tools include land use regulations, design and development standards, and public realm standards.
The unique characteristics of the plan area are articulated through defined subareas.
Each subarea is implemented by one or more zoning districts that regulate permitted land use types. Figure 4 shows proposed subareas.
Development standards are regulated by location, not zoning districts, and include standards that improve building design and require site design that complements existing defining features of the neighborhood’s built form, such as consistent setbacks, open space requirements, parking location requirements, and landscaping.
General discussions on the development and design standards to be implemented under the FOOG Specific Plan Update are included below.
The zoning district naming conventions reflect their location within a specific plan (FOOG is used as the zone prefix) as well as the land uses allowed within that zone.
The proposed zoning districts would become effective once codified following Council adoption of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update. Figure 5 shows proposed zoning districts for the FOOG Specific Plan area.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Figure 4 – Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Subareas
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Figure 5 – Proposed FOOG Specific Plan Zoning Districts Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Specific Plan Boundary
As discussed in Section 2.2, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area is generally located along (1) Fair Oaks Avenue from Maple Street and the I-210 Freeway to the city limits just north of Montana Street, and (2) Orange Grove Boulevard from Oakland Avenue just east of Los Robles Avenue to Cypress Avenue just west of Lincoln Avenue. Specific modifications to the proposed plan boundary are described above in the Relationship to the 2015 General Plan section.
Land Use
The proposed updates to the FOOG Specific Plan would update zoning districts tailored to current community needs in alignment with the General Plan vision. The focus of the FOOG Specific Plan Update allows for financially feasible commercial and residential developments, and helps ensure that new buildings, streetscape improvements, and added amenities contribute positively to the pedestrian experience. This updated approach to land use regulation would support a mixed-use area that creates a range of opportunities for higher-density, transit-oriented development, served by multimodal linkages, and pedestrian open space amenities.
The FOOG Specific Plan Update would contain the following zones and corresponding objectives:
• Commercial Flex FOOG-CF – enhance the existing eclectic character with a variety of R&D, commercial recreation, custom manufacturing, and light industrial uses; ensure that future uses are compatible with the existing character.
• Mixed-Use Core (FOOG-MU-C) – create a mixed-use activity center near downtown and high-quality transit that accommodates a diverse range of retail and services, prioritizing housing opportunities where residents can walk to shops, restaurants, jobs, and school; support projects that are a mix of residential and commercial, integrated either horizontally or vertically consistent with ground floor use requirements.
• Mixed-Use Neighborhood (FOOG-MU-N) – promote the development of mixeduse, pedestrian-friendly neighborhood with a broad range of retail, services, and offices including medical, as well as multi-family and senior housing; support projects that are a mix of residential and commercial, integrated either horizontally or vertically consistent with ground floor use requirements. • Open Space (OS) – provide opportunities for parks and recreation to residents and visitors.
• Public Semi-Public (PS) – provide for large public or semi-public land uses that may not be appropriate in other base zoning districts.
• Planned Development (PD) – achieve a particular mix of uses and appearance through a design review process resulting in quality urban design on large sites.
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Mass and Scale, Intensity and Density
The General Plan 2015 Land Use Element designates intensities and density ranges in the FOOG Specific Plan area to support the vision of a series of pedestrian-oriented villages and districts with unique identities, bolstered by their vibrant mix of uses, amenities, and streetscapes. Updates included in the FOOG Specific Plan are intended to:
• Implement the General Plan density ranges, measured as dwelling units per acre (du/ac), and intensity by floor area ratios (FAR); • Shape development in a manner that creates a defined public realm and appropriate scale of buildings for a visually appealing community; • Reduce building massing through setback and stepback requirements that create appropriate transitions to residential neighborhoods; • Support high-quality architecture and urban design through modulation requirements and a height averaging incentive;
• Require appropriate transitions to designated historic resources; and • Support opportunities to increase housing near transit and require various unit sizes to support individuals and families.
The Specific Plan generally implements the allowed density (du/ac) ranges and intensity (FAR) set by the General Plan Land Use Diagram and regulates density within the maximum capacity studied by the General Plan EIR, with exceptions as noted in Section 2.4.1.
Urban Design
Design standards for ground floor frontages proposed by the FOOG Specific Plan Update would help refine building mass and scale and support high-quality architecture and urban design. Frontage standards would prioritize pedestrian access by ensuring doorways are open to a public sidewalk or other public space; increase visibility into ground floor uses to create visual interest for pedestrians; promote shade through arcades and shade structures; support a consistent character when different uses are allowed on the ground floor within the same black; and limit blank walls on the ground floor to enhance visual interest and pedestrian comfort. The proposed standards are established for each block and are complementary to the previously discussed land use permissions. In mixed-use districts, ground floor requirements are regulated by frontage type, with varying setback depths depending on the percentage of commercial or residential ground floor space to allow for common space and other amenities. A successful ground floor design would create an inviting, visually engaging, shaded sidewalk and pedestrian environment that supports the intended commercial, residential, or mixed-use character of each district. Proposed ground floor standards would reflect community interest to improve the pedestrian experience at the street-level based on the following parameters:
• Façade Modulation
Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
• Ground Floor Height
• Location of Primary Entrances
• Amount of Street-Facing Transparency
• Minimization of Blank Walls
Open Space
The proposed updates to the FOOG Specific Plan would include open space requirements that would support high quality, accessible and usable open space across a variety of types that contribute to an active public realm and successful building design. Residential open space would be required based on the number of bedrooms, which would result in larger units having a larger open space requirement.
Required open space may be private to individual units or common among tenants.
The amount of publicly accessible open space required is also based on the size of a proposed project. These changes are intended to expand the amount of open space available to residents and employees along the corridor.
Parking
Vehicle parking requirements proposed by the updates to the FOOG Specific Plan would lower the parking requirement for some commercial uses to allow more flexibility for business owners as uses change over time; these modified standards are designed to support economic stability and reduce vacancies through simplified regulation. Residential parking requirements would also be reduced in part of the plan area not exempt from parking requirements by State law. The FOOG Specific Plan further proposes as a future implementation action a Streetscape Program for the primary thoroughfares which could study the feasibility of modifying the cross-section of the street and potentially changing its on-street parking.
Public Realm & Setbacks
Public realm requirements proposed by the FOOG Specific Plan Update would improve sidewalk conditions and the pedestrian experience by ensuring that a minimum sidewalk width is achieved by reinforcing existing widths or requiring slight increases in key locations as new development occurs. The FOOG Specific Plan Update builds on the Pasadena Street Design Guide to ensure sufficient widths to create a sidewalk environment that supports functional activities.
The sidewalk width requirements would correlate with the level of activity and surrounding densities, intensities, and uses identified in the FOOG Specific Plan area and address community desire for wider sidewalks. New width requirements for sidewalk zones of at least 10-feet will support adequate space for street trees, parkways, pedestrian movement, and other amenities. The FOOG Specific Plan Update would require parkways and street trees to be provided by new development, and trees would be required to be planted in larger tree wells and follow new planting requirements to better support tree health.
As mentioned in the open space sub-section, some developments in the FOOG Specific Plan area are required to provide plazas or paseos, particularly near the major Chapter 2: Project Description Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
intersection of Fair Oaks Avenue and Orange Grove Boulevard, to meet requirements for publicly accessible open space. Proposed requirements and guidelines are intended to increase pedestrian connectivity and visual interest by reducing large block sizes and providing additional publicly accessible open space, improving walkability and creating safe spaces for pedestrian gathering and movement.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
CHAPTER 3
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The following evaluation assesses the environmental impacts of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update in relation to the analysis provided in the 2015 GP EIR.
Determinations are made as to whether the proposed project would result in new significant impacts or substantially more severe effects, which would trigger the need for a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR.
For each threshold identified below, the following questions are addressed and discussed in the narrative for each issue:
What is the FOOG Specific Plan Update’s impact conclusion? For each impact identified below, a level of significance of the impact is provided.
While criteria for determining significant impacts are unique to each issue area, the environmental analysis applies a uniform classification of the impacts based on the following definitions consistent with CEQA and its implementing CEQA Guidelines:
• No Impact (NI) – A designation of no impact is given when no changes in the environment would occur.
• Less than Significant Impact (LTS) – A less than significant impact would cause no substantial adverse change in the environment. • Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation (LTS-M) – A less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated avoids substantial adverse impacts on the environment with adherence to identified mitigation measures.
For those issue areas where the impact of the FOOG Specific Plan Update would be less than significant with the incorporation of the same mitigation measure(s) identified in the GP EIR, the impact is identified as LTS-M(GP).
The number of the mitigation measure from the MMRP will be referenced and summarized in Chapter 4.
• Significant and Unavoidable Impact (S-U) – A significant unavoidable impact would cause a substantial adverse effect on the environment, and no feasible mitigation measures would be available to reduce the impact to a less than significant level.
What is the GP EIR impact conclusion? The issues that were found to be either less than significant or were found to have no impact in the Initial Study prepared for the GP Update and were therefore excluded from further analysis in the GP EIR, are identified with (IS) after the impact conclusion.
Does the GOOFSP Update involve new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts than those analyzed in the GP EIR?
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Are there any new or changed circumstances involving new significant impacts or substantially more severe impacts than those analyzed in the GP EIR? Is there any new information of substantial importance that was not and could not have been known at the time of certification of the GP EIR that rises to the level of requiring new analysis or verification?
Are any new mitigation measures required for the FOOG Specific Plan Update? Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for FOOG?
I. AESTHETICS.
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for FOOG?
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources,
including, but not limited
to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
c) Substantially degrade
the existing visual
character or quality of
the site and its
surroundings?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for FOOG?
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
LTS LTS No No No No
Discussion:
The GP EIR concluded that implementation of the approved General Plan, specifically including buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan area, would result in less than significant environmental impacts to aesthetics. While buildout of the General Plan would result in redevelopment in the FOOG Specific Plan area, the GP EIR found that development in accordance with the General Plan Land Use Element would not significantly impact views of the San Gabriel Mountains. The GP EIR concluded because the Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for FOOG?
north–south alignment of the street grid and the low-density nature of the neighborhood would be preserved; continued views of the San Gabriel Mountains would be available at buildout.
As detailed in Section 2.4, proposed updates to the FOOG Specific Plan primarily focus on refining and/or establishing land uses and zoning districts, as well as objective development standards to achieve the goals and vision of the General Plan. The FOOG Specific Plan proposes three zoning districts that allow for the development of higher intensity mix of retail, office, and multi-family housing uses. Updates included in the proposed FOOG Specific Plan are intended to implement the densities and intensities analyzed in the GP EIR, shape development in a manner that creates a defined public realm and appropriate scale of buildings for a visually appealing community, reduce building massing through setback and stepback requirements that create appropriate transitions to residential neighborhoods, support high-quality architecture and urban design through modulation requirements and a varied roof lines incentive, and require appropriate transitions to designated historic resources. To accomplish this, the FOOG Specific Plan generally implements the allowed density ranges and intensity set by the General Plan Land Use Diagram with relatively minor exceptions and regulates capacities within the maximums studied by the General Plan Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for FOOG?
EIR. Overall, the GP EIR concluded that proposed land use changes in the General Plan, and specifically as they pertain to the FOOG Specific Plan area, would not adversely impact visual and scenic quality, but would instead ensure that established residential neighborhoods would not be adversely affected by new mixed-use and commercial projects. As the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would align with and implement the General Plan, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would not significantly impact visual character or quality.
Additionally, as discussed in the GP EIR, there are no designated state scenic highways located within the FOOG Specific Plan area. Although permitted development under the approved General Plan Update could result in increased light and glare, the FOOG Specific Plan area is primarily developed, and any new development would be required to adhere to the Municipal Code and other regulations related to light and glare. Thus, the GP EIR found this issue to bell than significant.
Furthermore, the current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist also recommends considering a project’s potential to conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality if the project is located in an urbanized area. As discussed, Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for FOOG?
the proposed FOOG Specific Plan updates include additional land use regulations and establish development/design standards.
Similar to the General Plan Update, these FOOGSP updates would not significantly impact views of the San Gabriel Mountains and would improve the aesthetic quality of new development as well as help refine the existing character within the FOOG Specific Plan area through enhancements to the public realm. Therefore, impacts related to scenic quality would be less than significant with implementation of the FOOG Specific Plan.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for
FOOG?
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of
the California Resources
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for
FOOG?
Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
c) Conflict with existing
zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land
(as defined in Public
Resources Code Section
12220[g]), timberland (as
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for
FOOG?
defined by Public
Resources Code Section
4526), or timberland
zoned for Timberland
Production (as defined
by Government Code
Section 51104[g])?
d) Result in the loss of
forest land or conversion
of forest land to
non-forest use?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for
FOOG?
e) Involve other changes in
the existing environment
which, due to their
location or nature, could
result in conversion of
Farmland, to nonagricultural use?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Discussion:
Agricultural and forestry resources were addressed in the Initial Study (IS) prepared for the GP EIR, which found that no impacts to this topic would occur following the implementation of the General Plan Update. The Zoning Code permits commercial growing in designated zoning districts; however, the IS stated that the General Plan Update did not alter uses Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for
FOOG?
permitted by the Zoning Code, and the objectives of the General Plan Update did not relate to or conflict with commercial growing.1 The IS also stated that there are no Williamson Act contracts in the City, nor is any part of the City designated as timberland, forest land, or farmland; as such these types of lands would not be converted to another use.2 The General Plan Update did not have any impacts on agriculture and forestry resources.
Similar to the General Plan Update, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not alter zoning districts or permitted land uses in a way that conflicts with the Zoning Code regarding the conversion of farmland, timberland, or forest land. While the proposed FOOG Specific Plan includes additional land use regulations and establishes development/design standards, the objectives of the FOOG Specific Plan do not include land use provisions or regulations around commercial growing.
While modifications from the General Plan Update would alter the overall specific area boundaries within the City of 1 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013. 2 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does FOOG
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for
FOOG?
Pasadena with the formation of the FOOG Specific Plan, these modifications would not include any land designated as timberland, forest land, or farmland.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
III. AIR QUALITY.
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
a) Conflict with or
obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality
plan?
S-U S-U No No No No
b) Violate any air quality
standard or contribute
to an existing or
projected air quality
violation?
S-U S-U No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
c) Result in a
cumulatively
considerable net
increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the
project region is nonattainment under an
applicable federal or
state ambient air
quality standard?
S-U S-U No No No No
d) Expose sensitive
receptors to LTS-M(GP) LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Result in other
emissions (such as
those leading to odors)
adversely affecting a
substantial number of
people?
LTS-M(GP) LTS-M No No No No
Discussion:
The GP EIR found that potentially significant impacts to air quality would occur if mitigation measures were not incorporated; in some instances, the GP EIR found impacts to air quality to be significant and unavoidable because no feasible mitigation Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
measures would be available to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The City of Pasadena is entirely within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and therefore must comply with the rules and regulations imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAB is also subject to the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) adopted by the federal government. The SCAB is designated a nonattainment area (i.e., an area that does not meet the ambient air quality standards) for ozone (O3), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10) under the CAAQS, and a nonattainment area for O3, PM2.5, and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the NAAQS.3 The GP EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would increase employment and population beyond current SCAG forecasts and contribute to cumulative SCAB nonattainment designations. While certain aspects of the General Plan Update Land Use Plan would lead to improvements in transportation and thus decrease emissions from that source, the GP EIR found that even with implementation of Mitigation Measure 2-1, requiring the preparation of a technical assessment 3 California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2014a, April 17. Area Designations Maps/State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
evaluating potential project construction-related air quality impacts to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of construction permits, and Mitigation Measure 2-2, requiring the preparation of a technical assessment evaluating potential project operation-related air quality impacts to the City Planning Division prior to project approval, construction and operation impacts would not be reduced below the required SCAQMD thresholds, and that future impacts could be significant and unavoidable. The GP EIR stated that although submission of a technical assessment for possible construction related impacts required by Mitigation Measure 2-1 could reduce criteria air pollutant impacts for individual projects, the cumulative impact of all future construction emissions would result in significant and unavoidable impacts. In relation to the operation of buildout, the GP EIR stated that future activity would exceed SCAQMD thresholds as well, and that while Mitigation Measure 2-2 requiring the submission of an emissions assessment for operation-related impacts for individual future development projects, could reduce individual project impacts, the cumulative impacts of the General Plan Update buildout would be significant and unavoidable. The GP EIR found that implementation of the General Plan Update could expose existing or planned sensitive receptors to criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants (TACs), but that Mitigation Measure 2-3, requiring the submittal of a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) for certain new industrial or warehousing land uses requiring use Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
of diesel trucks within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use prior to project approval, would ensure that mobile sources of TACs not covered under SCAQMD permits would be considered during subsequent project-level environmental review. The HRA prepared for those projects identified under Mitigation Measure 2-3 would identify project-specific measures to minimize health risk and individual projects would be required to achieve the incremental risk thresholds established by SCAQMD, thus reducing impacts to less than significant. This, however, would only reduce the impact on a project-by-project basis, and the GP EIR concluded that the future buildout of the General Plan Update would result in cumulative impacts to sensitive receptors that are significant and unavoidable. The GP EIR found that Mitigation Measures 2-4 and 2-5 would require that major sources of air pollutants achieve incremental risk thresholds when placed near a sensitive receptor, as well as practice measures to minimize odors, reducing both impacts to a less than significant level.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan falls within the City of Pasadena and thus within the bounds of the area analyzed by the GP EIR; however, the FOOG Specific Plan area only accounts for a small portion of the area analyzed under the GP EIR.
The FOOG Specific Plan includes parcels generally bounded by Woodbury Road to the north, Raymond Avenue and Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Oakland Avenue to the east, Maple Street to the south, and Lincoln Avenue, Morton Avenue Sunset Avenue, and Linder Allery to the west. The FOOG Specific Plan area is primarily built out, and the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would govern land uses and improvements.
It is likely that similar to the impacts addressed in the GP EIR, impacts to air quality from the buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would be less than significant for each individual project (and will be analyzed on a project-by-project basis), but that the magnitude of future buildout, even though less than assumed under the GP EIR, could result in cumulative impacts that are significant and unavoidable. GP EIR Mitigation Measures 2-1 through 2-5 would be applicable to the proposed FOOG Specific Plan. Implementation of these mitigation measures would not result in increased impacts from those identified in the GP EIR and given that the FOOG Specific Plan area is proposed to be smaller in geographic area and with a smaller built out capacity than the area analyzed under the GP EIR, the FOOG Specific Plan would be anticipated to result in less impacts compared to those identified in the GP EIR.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur, nor would the significant unavoidable impacts identified in the GP EIR be worsened. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect, either
directly or through
habitat modifications, on
any species identified as
a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in
local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations,
or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
LTS LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
b) Have a substantial
adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural
community identified in
local or regional plans,
policies, regulations, or
by the California
Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
LTS LTS-M No No No No
c) Have a substantial
adverse effect on state LTS LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
or federally protected
wetlands (including, but
not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal,
filling, hydrological
interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substantially
with the movement of
any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife
species or with
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
established native
resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
f) Conflict with the
provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation
Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or
other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Discussion:
The GP EIR identified four areas within the boundaries of the General Plan Update area where sensitive natural habitats occur to varying degrees, including Arroyo Seco, Eaton Canyon Corridor, Hastings Canyon, and the San Rafael Hills; Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
however, the land use changes included within the General Plan Update would be confined to the eight specific plan areas within the City, none of which contain sensitive natural habitats and all of which are urbanized or suburban in character.
Yet, because Arroyo Seco, Eaton Canyon Corridor, Hastings Canyon, and the San Rafael Hills all contain sensitive natural habitats, the GP EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update could cause potentially significant impacts to biological resources. The GP EIR found that Arroyo Seco, Eaton Canyon, and Hastings Canyon all contain jurisdictional waters, and that the San Rafael Hills contain riparian and/or wetland habitat. No land use changes were proposed in these areas; however, the GP EIR states that buildout of the General Plan Update could have potentially significant impacts to sensitive species, sensitive natural communities, and jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands. Mitigation Measures 3-1 through 3-6 would ensure that a qualified biologist would be involved in the assessment, mitigation, and monitoring of all projects occurring on land where impacts to biological resources could be potentially significant; impacts would then be reduced to a less than significant level following implementation of the mitigation measures. The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that development projects approved under the GP Update, including within the City’s eight specific plan areas, would be required to comply with the City’s Master Street Tree Plan, Chapter 17.44 (Landscaping) of the City’s Zoning Code, and the Migratory Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), as applicable. As such, the General Plan Update’s impact on overland wildlife movement and migration would be less than significant and the General Plan Update would not conflict with the City’s tree protection ordinance. Additionally, the IS prepared for the GP EIR indicated that there are no adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans within the City and, as such, concluded that no impacts to such plans would result from the General Plan Update.
As stated in the GP EIR, all proposed land use changes would be confined to the eight specific plan areas in the City, including the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area. The proposed FOOG Specific Plan area is designated as urban and suburban developed land containing some developed open space.4 The GP EIR concluded that the specific plan areas, inclusive of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area, did not contain any sensitive natural habitats, jurisdictional waters, or wetlands. As such, there are no Mitigation Measures applicable to the proposed FOOG Specific Plan. Similar to the General 4 City of Pasadena. 2015 General Plan EIR: Figure 5.3-1, Vegetation Zones.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Plan Update, development under the FOOG Specific Plan would be required to comply with the City’s Master Street Tree Plan, Chapter 17.44 (Landscaping) of the City’s Zoning Code, and the MBTA, as applicable. Therefore, development under the FOOG Specific Plan would not conflict with the City’s tree protection ordinance and impacts to wildlife movement and migration would be less than significant. Additionally, as indicated in the IS prepared for the GP, there are no adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans within the City. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not result in impacts to any such plans.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
a) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of a
historical resource
pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section
15064.5?
LTS LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
b) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section
15064.5?
LTS-M(GP) LTS-M No No No No
c) Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource
or site or unique geologic
feature?
LTS LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
d) Disturb any human
remains, including those
interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
LTS LTS No No No No
Discussion:
The GP EIR found that, while the General Plan Update did not propose the alteration or demolition of any historic landmarks, any development under buildout of the General Plan Update could potentially impact a historic resource, as the GP EIR lists 7,440 historical resources throughout the City which meet at least one state or national criteria. The GP EIR states that the likelihood of encountering and impacting a historical resource is greater within a historic district, and that any specific plan area that is within or adjacent to a historic district has a greater likelihood for impacting historical resources. The Central District, North Lake, and Fair Oaks/Orange Grove Specific Plan Areas contain and/or are adjacent to historic landmarks Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
and/or historic districts. The GP EIR states that future projects under the buildout of the General Plan Update can avoid significantly impacting historical resources by adhering to the Pasadena Municipal Code 17.61.030 design review, to state and federal regulations, and to the policies of the City’s Land Use Element, including Policy LU 8.5, Scale and Character of New Construction in Designated Landmark and Historic Districts. Additionally, Mitigation Measure 9-4, which is discussed in Section XIII, would ensure that vibrations from construction activity would not impact architectural structures of historical significance. Impacts to archaeological resources can be reduced to a less than significant level upon implementation of Mitigation Measure 4-1, which would halt construction upon discovery of an archaeological resource and require consultation with a registered archaeologist before proceeding with development. The GP EIR lists the Topanga Formation as an area sensitive to paleontological resources and states that implementation of Mitigation Measure 4-2, which would enlist the service of a registered paleontologist prior to any grading activity in the vicinity of this area, as a sufficient measure to reduce the impact to a less than significant level. The GP EIR concluded that grading activities within the General Plan Update area are not expected to disturb human remains.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The FOOG Specific Plan area includes historically designated resources, City identified Landmark Buildings, and properties of significant historic character. The proposed FOOG Specific Plan would include development standards for Historic Adjacency. Projects on parcels with a designated historic resource in the FOOG Specific Plan would be subject to review for consistency with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. Projects sharing a property line with a designated historic resource in the FOOG Specific Plan would be subject to development standards, including height, massing, and setback limitations. Additionally, similar to the General Plan Update, proposed development in the FOOG Specific Plan area would be required to adhere to the Pasadena Municipal Code 17.61.030 design review, to state and federal regulations, and to the policies of the City’s Land Use Element, including Policy LU 8.5, Scale and Character of New Construction in Designated Landmark and Historic Districts. Therefore, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan is not expected to significantly impact historical resources. If archaeological resources are discovered during construction of any project under the buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan, GP EIR Mitigation Measure 4-1 would be implemented, and the impact level would be less than significant. As the FOOGSP area is not listed as a sensitive paleontological area, projects under buildout of the Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not significantly impact these resources.5 As the FOOG Specific Plan area is within the area analyzed by the GP EIR and found not likely to contain unknown human remains, the proposed FOOGSP would not significantly impact human remains with the required compliance with the Health and Safety Code.
The current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist also includes assessment criteria for potential impacts to tribal cultural resources. Tribal cultural resources are defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe. These types of resources were analyzed in the GP EIR and Native American consultation was conducted. No sacred lands were identified in the FOOG Specific Plan area during consultation.
The GP EIR concluded that the results of the Native American consultation did not result in new information or unknown impacts, but that while there are no known sacred lands within the City, the potential to uncover archaeological resources 5 City of Pasadena. 2015 General Plan EIR. Figure 5.4-2: Paleontological Sensitivity.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
during grading remains. Buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would incorporate GP EIR Mitigation Measure 4-1 if any archaeological resources, including tribal cultural resources, are discovered during construction, reducing the impact level to less than significant.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required. No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
VI. ENERGY
Would the project:
a) Conflict with adopted
energy conservation
plans?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
b) Use non-renewable
resources in a wasteful
and inefficient manner?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Discussion:
Energy was not addressed in the GP EIR, as the IS prepared for the GP EIR found that impacts to this topic from buildout of the General Plan would be less than significant. The IS stated that Pasadena’s Department of Water and Power (PWP) had the capacity to service the projected buildout of the General Plan Update.6 Additionally, the IS stated that the City of Pasadena is wholly within the bounds of a Southern California Gas Company service area. Forecasted use from the buildout of the General Plan Update – which would be an increase in energy use - was found to be within the capacity of existing 6 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
facilities.7 All new development and tenant improvements would be required to comply with the California Energy Code, Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24), CALGreen standards, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards, the City’s Green Action Plan, the City’s Green Building Standards Code (14.04.504), and the Open Space and Conservation Element of the General Plan, which together would increase efficiency and decrease consumption levels compared to existing structures built under the 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards or targets established prior to those standards.8 As such, the intensification of energy use resulting from buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a less than significant impact.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan is located within the boundaries of the area that was captured under the IS and GP EIR.
New developments in the FOOG Specific Plan area would be required to comply with the California Energy Code, Part 6 of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24), CALGreen standards, the City’s Climate Action Plan, and the City’s 7 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013. 8 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Green Building Standards Code, which collectively would increase efficiency and decrease consumption levels. Any new developments in the FOOG Specific Plan area would require lateral connections to mainlines in coordination with existing utility service providers. While the land use types under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would encourage multifamily residential and mixed-use zoning, and thereby potentially increase demand in energy over existing conditions, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area is largely developed and urbanized under existing conditions, and this increase in development is not expected to exceed forecasted use captured under the IS and GP EIR. No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
a) Expose people or
structures to potential
substantial adverse
effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death
involving:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
i. Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the
most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State
Geologist for the area
or based on other
substantial evidence
of a known fault?
Refer to California
Geological Survey
Special Publication
42. LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
ii. Strong seismic ground
shaking? LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
iii. Seismic-related
ground failure,
including liquefaction
as delineated on the
most recent Seismic
Hazards Zones Map
issued by the State
Geologist for the area
or based on other
substantial evidence
of known areas of
liquefaction?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
iv. Landslides as
delineated on the
most recent Seismic
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Hazards Zones Map
issued by the State
Geologist for the area
or based on other
substantial evidence
of known areas of
landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
c) Be located on a geologic
unit or soil that is LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
unstable, or that would
become unstable as a
result of the project, and
potentially result in on-or
off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive
soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks
to life or property?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
e) Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or
alternative wastewater
disposal systems where
sewers are not available
for the disposal of
wastewater?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Discussion:
Geology and soils were addressed in the IS prepared for the GP EIR, which found that impacts to this topic would be less than significant following the implementation of the General Plan Update. According to the Safety Element of the General Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Plan one Alquist-Priolo earthquake fault zone along the Raymond Fault, an active strand of the Sierra Madre Fault, and a possibly active strand of the Sierra Madre Fault pass through the City, and the San Fernando and Whittier Faults are located within 10.5 and 15.5 miles from the City, respectively. All active faults could experience a surface rupture in the lifetimes of development resulting from buildout of the General Plan Update. The Safety Element, California Building Code, the City’s Building and Safety Division, and the City Building Code would require all new development to comply with policies and regulations surrounding surface ruptures and would be required to conduct and submit engineering geology and soils reports prior to permit approval. Policies within the above stated regulatory setting would also enforce specific building standards related to seismic ground shaking, as the soil in the City is either sandy, stony, or gravelly loam formed on the alluvial fan adjacent to the San Gabriel Mountains, which are soil types characterized as loose and porous and thus susceptible to seismic ground shaking. Geotechnical investigations be required for all new development approval as the City contains zones where liquefaction could occur near Arroyo Seco, in the San Rafael Hills, and near Eaton Canyon and Hastings Canyon. State and City building codes contain standards that new development must comply with pertaining to liquefaction as well. Geotechnical investigations would also be required to investigate and recommend measures to reduce the potential Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
for landslides and building designs would be required to comply with slope standards, as the City is susceptible to earthquake-induced landslides originating in the San Gabriel Mountains and San Rafael Hills. The IS concluded that natural water soil erosion potential in the City is low, that future construction has the possibility to expose soil to erosion, and that all construction activity would be required to practice soil erosion mitigation practices and adhere to a transport and grading control plan as required by the Los Angeles County Stormwater Program. The above-mentioned potential for landslides and liquefaction in addition to the susceptibility to lateral spreading and/or collapse due to the project location and quality of the soil would need to be included in each geotechnical investigation. Groundwater extraction would be monitored by the Raymond Basin Management Board to ensure the continued prevention of regional subsidence.9 Finally, each geotechnical investigation would be required to address soil expansion and each project would be required to comply with the associated standards of the Building and Safety Division and California Building Code. As the project area is urbanized, septic tanks would not be utilized during buildout of the General Plan Update. Development would include sewer lateral lines and would 9 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
not rely on septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. With adherence to all regulations and policies, submission of a geotechnical report, and implementation of appropriate practices during construction, the IS concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would have a less than significant impact to geology and soils.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan falls within the same City boundaries as were analyzed in the IS, and therefore is subject to similar risks and associated potential impacts related to geology and soils. Therefore, the FOOG Specific Plan would not cause significant impacts beyond those analyzed in the IS for the GP EIR. Additionally, buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would be required to adhere to the same regulations, policies, and standards pertaining to geology and soils impacts, both during construction and operation, including the preparation of project-specific geotechnical investigations for individual development projects.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse
gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that
may have a significant
impact on the
environment?
S-U S-U No No No No
b) Conflict with an
applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for
the purpose of reducing
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
Discussion:
The GP EIR concluded that while certain improvements under the buildout of the General Plan Update would reduce Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions per service population, the buildout would still create more GHG emissions than existing conditions and would not achieve long-term GHG reduction goals under Executive Order S-03-05 and target levels of AB 32; after implementing Mitigation Measure 5-1, which required the City to prepare a community climate action plan/greenhouse gas reduction plan, the impacts related to GHG emissions would remain significant and unavoidable.
Forecasting tools to measure future emissions from transportation, energy, waste, water/wastewater, and other sources (landscaping equipment, light commercial equipment, and construction equipment) provided a short-term projection for future levels; however, these projections were found to be insufficient given the uncertainty of how the General Plan Update buildout would be phased. The GP EIR found that without implementation of a community climate action/GHG reduction Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
plan and under current state and federal regulations, the population growth that would result from buildout of the General Plan Update would prevent the City from meeting AB 32 targets for emissions. While buildout would improve transportation by creating a live/work environment, offering options for alternative and multi-modal mobility, and utilizing energy efficient design and technology, the GP EIR stated that the population growth would still create more emissions than existing conditions. The community climate action plan/greenhouse gas reduction plan would establish community-wide targets, monitoring, and inventory reporting standards. The GP EIR established that the community wide GHG emissions inventory would be updated every five years, and additional programs would be established to work in conjunction with the initial community climate action plan/greenhouse gas reduction plan (programs specific for building energy, transportation, waste, water, wastewater, agriculture, etc.). The GP EIR concluded that it is uncertain whether buildout would create significant and unavoidable GHG related impacts without knowing the phasing of buildout or what future federal, state, and local programs will exist at the time. The GP EIR found that the General Plan Update would not conflict with the CARB Scoping Plan or the Southern California Association of Governments’ (SCAG) 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS).
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan would further restrict the land uses from those analyzed in the GP EIR and establish additional development/design standards. The proposed FOOG Specific Plan would allow for increased intensity within the FOOG Specific Plan area compared to existing conditions; however, proposed density would be equal to or lower than limits analyzed under the GP EIR. Additionally, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would be within the General Plan buildout analyzed in the GP EIR. The FOOG Specific Plan improvements included in the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would create a district that supports a mix of housing and commercial development near transit and existing services to encourage walkability and transit usage, all supported by a public realm that invites residents, employees, and visitors to walk the district, with active streetscapes, open spaces, and rich landscaping that encourages public life and a sense of place.
Still, the GP EIR concluded that with buildout of the proposed General Plan Update, including buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan area, community-wide GHG emissions would not meet the long-term GHG reduction goal under Executive Order S03-05. As such, new development under buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would be subject to the policies of Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
the City’s current Climate Action Plan, which was adopted in 2018 to fulfill the requirements under GP EIR Mitigation Measure 5-1, as well as additional climate action/GHG reduction plans established locally, state-wide, or federally at the time.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur, nor would the significant unavoidable impacts identified in the GP EIR be worsened.
Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) Create a significant
hazard to the public or
the environment through
the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous
materials?
LTS LTS No No No No
b) Create a significant
hazard to the public or
the environment through
reasonably foreseeable
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
upset and accident
conditions involving the
release of hazardous
materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous
emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed
school?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
d) Be located on a site that
is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to
Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as
a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the
public or the
environment?
LTS LTS No No No No
e) For a project located
within an airport land use
plan or, where such a
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
plan has not been
adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or
public use airport, would
the project result in a
safety hazard for people
residing or working in the
project area?
f) For a project within the
vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard
for people residing or
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
working in the project
area?
g) Impair implementation of
or physically interfere
with an adopted
emergency response
plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
LTS LTS No No No No
h) Expose people or
structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where
residences are
intermixed with
wildlands?
Discussion:
The GP EIR found that buildout in accordance with the General Plan Update would involve the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials; however, impacts would be less than significant as construction would be short-term and in compliance with California Health and Safety Code, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and SCAQMD regulations; project operations would reduce industrial uses compared to existing conditions and new development would comply with the City’s Safety Element. The GP EIR found that 844 hazardous material sites fall within the City or within a Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
0.25-mile radius thereof; however, compliance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and related requirements, as well as adherence to the City’s Land Use Element Policy LU 3.5 Hazardous Uses would bring the impact level to less than significant. The GP EIR concluded that project development could affect the implementation of an emergency response or evacuation plan due to population growth, development intensity, and road closures during construction; however, coordination with the Pasadena Fire Department (PFD) and compliance with the Los Angeles County Operational Area Emergency Response Plan and the City’s Emergency Operation Plan would ensure each project and buildout of the General Plan Update has a less than significant impact related to this topic. Finally, the GP EIR found that areas of the City near very high fire hazard severity zones could expose structures and/or residences to fire hazards during buildout of the General Plan Update. However, compliance with the International Fire Code, California Fire Code, and the City’s Safety Element would ensure that future development under the General Plan Update would not expose people or structures to substantial wildfire hazards, and impacts would be less than significant. The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that no portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport, and no related impact Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
would occur. Furthermore, the IS prepared for the GP EIR concluded that the General Plan Update would not allow development of buildings with increased height that affect flight patterns or pose a safety hazard, and related impacts would be less than significant.
Similar to the buildout analyzed in the GP EIR, construction under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan could potentially involve the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials. However, the further regulation of land uses under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would reduce industrial uses compared to existing conditions. Additionally, construction associated with individual development projects under buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would be temporary in nature, and development would comply with the California Health and Safety Code, OSHA, and SCAQMD regulations. The FOOG Specific Plan is not expected to result in significant impacts related to the transport, use, and/or disposal of hazardous materials. The GP EIR did not list any hazardous material sites in the FOOG Specific Plan area; however, if a site were to be located with a 0.25- mile radius of the FOOG Specific Plan area, future development would be required to comply with CERCLA, RCRA, California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and related requirements, as well as adhere to the City’s Land Use Element Policy LU 3.5:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Hazardous Uses. As a result, hazardous material-related impacts would be less than significant. Future development under buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan could result in temporary road closures. Similar to the GP Update analyzed in the GP EIR, future development under buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would be required to coordinate with the PFD. Additionally, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would not interfere with the Los Angeles County Operational Area Emergency Response Plan or the City’s Emergency Operation Plan. Furthermore, no future development project would be permitted to block any designated evacuation routes. Therefore, similar to the GP EIR, the FOOG Specific Plan is not expected to significantly affect the implementation of an emergency response or evacuation plan.
The current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist also includes assessment criteria for potential impacts to wildfire for those areas located within or near a state responsibility area or on lands classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone for local and state responsibility areas, and no impact would occur.10
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
10 City of Pasadena. 2015 General Plan EIR. Figure 5.6-1, Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste
discharge requirements?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
b) Substantially deplete
groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially
with groundwater
recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local
groundwater table level
(e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a
level which would not
support existing land
uses or planned uses for
which permits have been
granted)?
LTS LTS No No No No
c) Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern
of the site or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of
stream or river, in a
manner, which would
result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
LTS LTS No No No No
d) Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern
of the site or area,
including through the
alteration of the course of
stream or river,
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner, which
would result in flooding
on- or offsite?
e) Create or contribute
runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of
existing or planned
stormwater drainage
systems or provide
substantial additional
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
sources of polluted
runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially
degrade water quality? LTS LTS No No No No
g) Place housing within a
100-year flood hazard
area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard
Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or
dam inundation area as
shown in the City of
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Pasadena adopted
Safety Element of the
General Plan or other
flood or inundation
delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year
flood hazard area
structures, which would
impede or redirect flood
flows?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
i) Expose people or
structures to a significant LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding,
including flooding as a
result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche,
tsunami, or mudflow? LTS LTS No No No No
Discussion:
The GP EIR found that buildout of the General Plan Update could increase the amount of impervious surfaces in the City of Pasadena resulting in an increase in surface water flows into drainage systems within the watershed, potentially resulting in erosion, siltation, and/or flooding. However, the City is primarily developed and urbanized and development would be Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
required to adhere to applicable local, state, and federal regulations and standards, as well as implement site design measures, low-impact development, and best management practices (BMPs), including infiltration features that contribute to groundwater recharge and minimize stormwater runoff, erosion, siltation, and/or flooding. As such, these impacts would be less than significant. The GP EIR stated that with the implementation of evacuation plans, as required by the City’s Safety Element, the impact to risk of loss, injury, or death in the case of dam failure less than significant. The GP EIR found that during the construction phases of projects developed under the General Plan Update, there is the potential for short-term unquantifiable increases in storm water pollutant concentrations; and during operation of such projects, the quality of storm runoff (sediment, nutrients, metals, pesticides, pathogens, and hydrocarbons) may be altered. Compliance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations would reduce water quality impacts associated with construction and operational impacts related to stormwater pollution and water quality to less than significant levels. While the GP EIR found that portions of the City are susceptible to inundation by mudflows, none of the proposed development under the General Plan Update fell within these susceptible areas, and the impact was found to be less than significant. The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that no Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
portions of the City of Pasadena are located within a 100-year floodplain and, therefore, no impact related to floodplains would occur.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan would further restrict land uses from those analyzed in the FOOG Specific Plan area in the GP EIR and would establish additional development/design standards. The FOOG Specific Plan area is currently developed and urbanized. New development under the buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would be subject to applicable local, state, and federal regulations and standards pertaining to water quality, waste discharges, and hydraulic hazard risk reduction. Impacts to hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. Furthermore, as indicated in the IS prepared for the GP, no portion of the City, including the FOOG Specific Plan area, is located within a 100-year floodplain. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not place structures within the flow of a 100-year flood and no impact would occur.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist also recommends considering a project’s potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. As previously discussed, new development under the buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would be subject to applicable water quality regulations. Additionally, no development in the FOOGSP area would include the extraction of groundwater.
Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not conflict with the implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, and the impact would be less than significant.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
a) Physically divide an
established community? LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
b) Conflict with any
applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction
over the project
(including, but not limited
to the general plan,
specific plan, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for
the purpose of avoiding
or mitigating an
environmental effect?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
c) Conflict with any
applicable habitat
conservation plan (HCP)
or natural community
conservation
plan (NCCP)?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Discussion:
The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that land use changes proposed within the specific plan areas are intended to be integrated into the existing uses and surrounding neighborhoods. As such, the General Plan update would not physically divide an existing community and the impact would be less than significant. The GP EIR compared the General Plan Update’s proposed land use changes - including proposed net increases in development and new policies pertaining to Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
building intensity and urban design - to existing land uses in the City and concluded that possible direct impacts to land use and planning would be less than significant. As found by the GP EIR and in accordance with California Government Code Section 65302, the General Plan Update would address two of the seven required Elements: Land Use and Mobility. The GP EIR also found that the General Plan Update would be consistent with the SCAG RTP/SCS, as required.
It was concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would result in a net increase of 12,312 additional residential dwelling units and 10,988,959 square feet of nonresidential uses; this net increase would be framed and regulated by the goals and policies of the City’s Land Use and Mobility Elements, which support growth through 2035.
Changes to prior land use designations proposed by the General Plan Update primarily allowed for more mixed-use and redevelopment of existing industrial uses for more integrated non-residential land uses that would foster local goods and services and business in the City. Buildout capacity would be limited by the following standards for density (du/ac) and Floor Area Ratio (FAR): commercial uses with FARs between 0.0 and 3.0; Research and Development designations (which would replace Industrial designation) with FARs of 0.9 and 0.0-1.25, respectively; Low Mixed Use (0.0–1.0 FAR, 0–32 Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
du/ac), Low Medium Mixed Use (0.0– 1.75 FAR, 0–48 du/ac), Medium Mixed Use (0.0–2.25 FAR, 0–87 du/ac), and High Mixed Use (0.0–3.0 FAR, 0–87 du/ac).
The GP EIR concluded that modifying land use designations and the corresponding buildout would create a positive live/work environment, which would enhance quality of life while reducing environmental impacts related to consumption, pollution, and emissions due to transit orientation, reduced commutes, and improved multi-modal options. Moreover, the GP EIR found that additional goals and policies added to the Land Use and Mobility Elements by the General Plan Update would ensure new development would be compatible with the existing character of the City while enhancing urban design and regulating sustainable growth. The GP EIR stated that in addition to the goals and policies of the Land Use and Mobility Elements, new development would also be required to comply with Title 17 of the City’s Municipal Code and applicable design guidelines.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The GP EIR stated that additional environmental impacts from changes to land use patterns and building intensity and design, such as impacts to air quality, hazards, flooding, and traffic, would be addressed individually in each corresponding section. As such, the GP EIR found that the proposed updates would not conflict with any existing applicable policies or regulations and would be implemented in such a way that creates compatibility within the plan area; impacts to land use and planning were determined to be less than significant in the GP EIR. Additionally, the IS prepared for the GP EIR found that there are no adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans within the City and, as such, concluded that no impacts to such plans would result from the General Plan Update.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update would have similar land use objectives as the GP EIR and includes further regulations around land uses and establishment of additional development/design standards to reflect development patterns within the FOOG Specific Plan area that have occurred since adoption of the General Plan Update. Similar to the General Plan Update, the FOOG Specific Plan Update is intended to be integrated into the existing uses and surrounding neighborhoods and would not physically divide an established community. The FOOG Specific Plan proposes new zoning Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
districts that would allow for the creation of a vibrant and visually cohesive corridor, weaving together several distinct pedestrian-oriented districts that complement and build upon the cultural and architectural history of the community and surrounding neighborhoods. The City’s General Plan Land Use Element designates a range of intensities and densities in the FOOG Specific Plan area to support the vision of a series of pedestrian-oriented villages and districts with unique identities, bolstered by their vibrant mix of uses, amenities, and streetscapes.
The Specific Plan generally implements the allowed density ranges and intensity set by the General Plan Land Use Diagram and regulates density within the maximum density studied by the General Plan EIR, with some modest increases in residential density in mixed-use areas along transit corridors and some slight decreases in some areas as well. The additional development/design standards would further the goals set forth in the Land Use and Mobility Elements as well as the objectives presented in the GP EIR; additionally, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan Update would be within the General Plan buildout analyzed in the GP EIR. The FOOG Specific Plan Update would not conflict with Title 17 of the City’s Municipal Code, California Government Code Section 65302, or SCAG’s RTP/SCS. Furthermore, as indicated in the IS Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
prepared for the GP EIR, there are no adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans within the City. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not result in impacts to any such plans.
As discussed in Chapter 2, Project Description, the FOOG Specific Plan Update defines these current uses and future development of these new land use types would occur in compliance with policies and regulations set forth under the updated FOOG Specific Plan, once adopted, and the Pasadena Municipal Code. Additionally, the Zoning Code would be amended to incorporate a new FOOGSP ordinance to regulate zoning consistent with the General Plan, replacing the existing Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 17.34. Furthermore, as previously discussed, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan Update would be within the General Plan buildout analyzed in the GP EIR. Therefore, the updated FOOG Specific Plan boundary and the three new land use types proposed under the FOOG Specific Plan Update would not result in significant land use and planning impacts at their expected buildout.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that
would be of value to the
region and the residents
of the state?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
b) Result in the loss of
availability of a locallyimportant mineral
resource recovery site
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
delineated on a local
general plan, specific
plan or other land use
plan?
Discussion:
Mineral resources were addressed in the IS prepared for the GP EIR, which concluded that there would be no impact to mineral resources following implementation of the General Plan Update.11 The IS states that there is no active mining in the City. Based on the California Geological Survey and as stated in the IS, the Eaton Wash and Arroyo Seco Wash are classified as Mineral Resource Sectors and may contain mineral resources within the City, but neither contain active mines or reserves, and buildout of the General Plan Update would not result in development in either area. Additionally, there are no mineral 11 City of Pasadena, Initial Study/Notice of Preparation, 2013.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
resource recovery sites in the City. As the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update would occur within the same boundaries as those analyzed in the GP EIR and it is not located within any of the identified Mineral Resource Sectors, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area would not contain mineral resources or develop on Mineral Resource Sectors.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XIII. NOISE
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to
or generation of noise
levels in excess of
standards established in
the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of
other agencies?
LTS LTS No No No No
b) Exposure of persons to
or generation of S-U S-U No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne
noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent
increase in ambient
noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels
existing without the
project?
LTS LTS No No No No
d) A substantial temporary
or periodic increase in
ambient noise levels in
S-U S-U No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
the project vicinity above
levels existing without
the project?
e) For a project located
within an airport land use
plan or, where such a
plan has not been
adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or
public use airport, would
the project expose
people residing or
working in the project
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
area to excessive noise
levels?
f) For a project within the
vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project
expose people residing
or working in the project
area to excessive noise
levels?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Discussion:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The GP EIR analyzed impacts to noise from construction and operation of buildout of the General Plan Update, including stationary noise, traffic noise, rail noise, industrial noise, and affiliated levels of vibration. The GP EIR assessed the updates for compatibility with the City’s Land Use and Noise Elements. The GP EIR concluded that increased stationary and traffic noises from buildout would have a less than significant impact; if residential and sensitive land uses continue to be developed in compatible areas, and those uses that are compatible with transportation noises are developed in compliance with the Noise and Land Use Elements, as well as other state and local regulations pertaining to noise, then this impact would be less than significant as well. Regarding exposure to long-term groundborne vibration, the GP EIR found that both rail and industrial uses could cause a potentially significant impact. Portions of the City are designated for and operated as industrial uses. Mitigation Measure 9-1 requires all industrial projects to submit a vibration study providing evidence that vibrationcausing activity would not exceed levels set forth by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The City of Pasadena is served by the Metro A Line. The portion of this line in the City runs north-south parallel to Arroyo Parkway and then turns to an east-west orientation along I-210, with its current terminus in the City of Azusa. Mitigation Measure 9-2 requires all new development within screening distance of the Metro A Line to submit a study conducted by an acoustical engineer to the Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
City’s Planning Division that identifies vibration impacts and possible reduction measures, if needed. Implementation of Mitigation Measures 9-1 and 9-2 would reduce groundborne vibration impacts to a less than significant level. The GP EIR concluded that short-term impacts from construction vibration would be significant and unavoidable for buildout of the General Plan Update; Mitigation Measure 9-3 would reduce impacts to sensitive receptors within 25 feet of activity by substituting less intensive equipment when possible and utilizing vibration reduction techniques; however, because each new development involved in the buildout is project-specific, the GP EIR determined it is not possible to mitigate this impact below a significant and unavoidable level. Mitigation Measure 9-4 further addresses vibrations from construction on sensitive architectural structures within 25 feet of activity; yet, similar to construction vibration impacts to sensitive receptors, this impact would remain significant and unavoidable in the context of total buildout as each project would present individual circumstances. Mitigation Measure 9-5 requires all construction permits be issued only after submission of a plan for noise and vibration reducing BMPs for all development within 500 feet of a noise-sensitive receptor; nevertheless, the GP EIR concluded that this mitigation measure would not reduce the impacts of construction activities to a less than significant level as the phasing, location, and magnitude of future development under buildout is unknown. Therefore, the GP EIR concluded Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
that construction related noise impacts are significant and unavoidable. The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that no portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport, and no impact would occur. Furthermore, the IS prepared for the GP EIR concluded that noise from helicopter flights would be periodic and, thus, the impact resulting from noise from private use heliports would be less than significant.
Buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan could have potentially significant noise impacts due to construction-related noise and vibration, as the phasing and location of future projects are currently unknown. However, similar to the updates analyzed under the GP EIR, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would implement GP EIR Mitigation Measures 9-3 through 9-5 to ensure activity within the vicinity of sensitive land uses, receptors, and architectural structures is compliant with FTA criteria and that BMPs are utilized throughout the construction phase of each future development project. As the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would support the development of light industrial uses within the FOOG Specific Plan area, it is possible the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would create impacts to vibration from this use. As such, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would implement the GP EIR Mitigation Measures to assess vibration impacts from industrial uses and implement Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
reduction measures. The proposed FOOG Specific Plan area is north of the Metro A Line and therefore would not be subject to noise and vibration levels from rail use. As indicated in the IS prepared for the GP, there are no airports within two miles of the City. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not result in noise impacts related to an airport land use plan or public airport. Furthermore, similar to the General Plan Update, helicopter flights within the FOOG Specific Plan area would be periodic and, as the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would have no effect on helicopter usage or flight patterns, it would cause no new helicopter noise impacts.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur, nor would the significant unavoidable impacts identified in the GP EIR be worsened. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial
unplanned population
growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by
proposing new homes
and businesses) or
indirectly (for example,
through extension of
roads or other
infrastructure)?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
b) Displace substantial
numbers of existing
housing, necessitating
the construction of
replacement housing
elsewhere?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
c) Displace substantial
numbers of people,
necessitating the
construction of
replacement housing
elsewhere?
LTS LTS (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Discussion:
The GP EIR concluded that, while population, housing, and employment growth induced by buildout of the General Plan update would likely surpass SCAG’s forecast, the impact of buildout would be less than significant. The General Plan Update accommodates growth in all sectors; it permits new housing opportunities and it opens more opportunities for employment. The GP EIR found that the City-wide utilities and infrastructure required to service the projected buildout population would be sufficient, and each service is discussed in more detail within its individual section of this document (i.e., Hydrology and Water Quality, Public Services, Transportation and Traffic, Utilities and Service Systems). One of the central objectives of the General Plan Update is to create a housing/job balance within a more work/live environment; the GP EIR found that buildout would achieve this goal, which would offset the detrimental impacts that growth would have.
The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that the General Plan Update would increase the number of dwelling units by allowing higher intensity residential uses and mixed-use development and that growth in accordance with the proposed General Plan Update was not expected to displace existing housing or people, as the General Plan Update would increase the Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
number of dwelling units by allowing higher intensity residential uses and mixed-use development. Therefore, the IS concluded that the impacts related to displacement of housing and people would be less than significant.
The FOOG Specific Plan area previously analyzed by the GP EIR shares the same objective of creating a more balanced housing/job ratio. Since the GP EIR was certified, changes in development patterns within the FOOG Specific Plan have resulted in more opportunities for multifamily residential uses and mixed-use development, further achieving this goal. The FOOG Specific Plan area is primarily built out under existing conditions and buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not exceed the projected growth analyzed in the GP EIR. Additionally, buildout of the FOOGSP would be within the General Plan buildout analyzed in the GP EIR. Therefore, similar to the GP EIR, the FOOG Specific Plan would not displace substantial numbers of housing or people, and the impacts would be less than significant.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? LTS LTS No No No No
b) Police Protection? LTS LTS No No No No
c) Schools? LTS LTS No No No No
d) Libraries? LTS LTS No No No No
Discussion:
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
The General Plan Update area is within the City of Pasadena and is serviced by the PFD, Pasadena Police Department (PPD), Pasadena Unified School District (PUSD), and the Pasadena Public Library (PPL). The PFD operates eight stations throughout the City, with an average daily staff of 51. The GP EIR found that, while population growth and increased infrastructure from buildout of the General Plan Update would result in higher demand for service from the PFD and possibly require new or expanded facilities, compliance with existing regulations and coordination during road closures related to future construction would ensure impacts remain less than significant. The PPD aims to employ 1.63 officers per capita and
0.72 officers per 1,000 residents. The GP EIR found that, while population growth and increased infrastructure from buildout of the General Plan Update would result in higher demand for service from the PPD and possibly require new or expanded facilities, compliance with existing regulations would ensure impacts remain less than significant. The GP EIR concluded that while population growth from buildout of the General Plan Update would create new students in the population, the majority of which would be concentrated in three specific plan areas, it is unlikely that forecasted growth would exceed the capacity of existing facilities; additionally, per SB 50, all new development in the City is subject to a School Impact Fee to ensure that school services continue to meet the needs of the population. The PPL operates 10 facilities, all within 1 mile Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
or walking distance of each residence. The GP EIR found that while buildout of the General Plan update would induce population growth, the estimated growth would not exceed the PPL’s capacity to serve the community; additionally, all new development is subject to fees and taxes that fund public services, including a Library Special Tax, to ensure continued funding for the PPL. The GP EIR concluded that all impacts to public services would be less than significant.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan would further restrict land uses from those analyzed in the GP EIR and establish additional development/design standards. The FOOG Specific Plan area is primarily built out under existing conditions and buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not exceed the projected growth analyzed in the GP EIR. Additionally, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would be within the General Plan buildout analyzed in the GP EIR. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan is not anticipated to increase demand for public services beyond the level analyzed in the GP EIR, and impacts would be less than significant.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XVI. RECREATION
Would the project:
a) Would the project result
in a substantial adverse
physical impact
associated with the
provisions of new or
physically altered
governmental facilities,
need for new or
physically altered
governmental facilities,
the construction of which
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
could cause significant
environmental impacts,
in order to maintain
acceptable service
ratios, response times or
other performance
objectives for parks?
b) Would the project
increase the use of
existing neighborhood
and regional parks or
other recreational
facilities such that
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
substantial physical
deterioration of the
facility would occur or be
accelerated?
c) Does the project include
recreational facilities or
require the construction
or expansion of
recreational facilities,
which might have an
adverse physical effect
on the environment?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Discussion:
The City’s Municipal Code does not dictate a resident/acreage ratio for parkland and open space. While buildout of the General Plan Update would induce population growth and likely increase demand for parkland and open space and potentially result in the deterioration of existing facilities, the GP EIR found that improvements to existing and development of new open space and recreation amenities included in buildout, in conjunction with the Residential Impact Fee that each new development would be subject to as well as other in-lieu fees, impacts would be less than significant. The GP EIR concluded that the increase in population projected by buildout of the General Plan Update would increase demand for parkland, open space, and recreational facilities; increased use could deteriorate existing facilities or require the development of additional facilities. The GP EIR found that land uses permitting parkland, open space, and recreational activities would not be converted and that there would be opportunities for additional facilities to be built. All residential development under the buildout of the GP would be required to pay a Residential Impact Fee; any type of project that Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
acquires open space would also be subject to in-lieu fees. As such, the GP EIR found that impacts to recreation would be less than significant with adherence to existing regulations, including payment of applicable fees.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan would include open space requirements that would support high quality, accessible and usable open space across a variety of types that contribute to an active public realm. Residential open space would be required according to the number of bedrooms, resulting in units with more bedrooms having a larger open space requirement. Required open space may be private to individual units or common among tenants. Publicly accessible open space would be required for projects with 120,000 sq ft and more of gross floor area. The amount of publicly accessible open space required increases based on the size of a proposed project. Specific locations have been identified to require a paseo to reduce block sizes and provide better pedestrian access to destinations if the associated parcels redevelop as part of the publicly accessible open space requirement. Similar to future development projects under the GP EIR, new development under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would comply with the City’s Municipal Code, Residential Impact Fees, and any other in-lieu and/or acquisition fees to ensure a less than significant impact to parks and recreation.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XVII. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Would the project:
a) Conflict with an
applicable plan,
ordinance or policy
establishing measures of
effectiveness for the
performance of the
circulation system, taking
into account all modes of
transportation including
mass transit and nonmotorized travel and
LTS-M(GP) LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
relevant components of
the circulation system,
including but not limited
to intersections, streets,
highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle
paths, and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an
applicable congestion
management program,
including, but not limited
to level of service
standards and travel
LTS S-U No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
demand measures, or
other standards
established by the
county congestion
management agency for
designated roads or
highways?
c) Result in a change in air
traffic patterns, including
either an increase in
traffic levels or a change
in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
d) Substantially increase
hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous
intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
LTS LTS No No No No
e) Result in inadequate
emergency access? LTS LTS No No No No
f) Conflict with adopted
policies, plans, or
programs regarding
LTS-M(GP) LTS-M No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
public transit, bicycle, or
pedestrian facilities, or
otherwise decrease the
performance or safety of
such facilities?
Discussion:
The GP EIR analyzed the General Plan Updates for impacts to traffic and transportation based on calculations for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per capita, vehicle trips (VT) per capita, proximity and quality of bicycle networks, proximity and quality of transit networks, and pedestrian accessibility, as well as compatibility with the City’s Mobility Element. The GP EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would not conflict with the City’s plans, ordinances, or policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the complete circulation system, and complies with adopted policies, plans, and programs for alternative transportation. It found that transportation performance would improve, and Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
pedestrian and bicycle accessibility would increase from buildout of the General Plan Update, which would satisfy Mobility Plan goals around livability, non-motorized transit, and economic viability. The GP EIR stated that all improvements within the City are funded through the City’s transportation fee program with the exception of bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The proposed General Plan Update included Policy 2.10, requiring the City to amend the existing transportation impact fee to include pedestrian and bicycle improvements.
The GP EIR concluded that without full funding of circulation improvements, the General Plan Update would result in a significant impact. As such, Mitigation Measure 13-1 was identified in the GP EIR, which required the City to update the transportation impact fee program in place at the time the GP EIR was prepared by 2020 to ensure that impacts to traffic and transportation resulting from buildout of the General Plan Update remain less than significant. The City implemented Mitigation Measure 13-1 and updated the transportation impact free program, as mandated by AB 1600 legislation, as codified by California Code Government Section 66000 et seq. The GP EIR found that buildout traffic conditions would result in designated road and/or highways exceeding county congestion management program thresholds, resulting in a Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
significant project impact at the intersection of Pasadena Avenue at California Boulevard during the AM peak hour; impacts at all other intersections under Metro’s Congestion Management Program (CMP) would be less than significant. The GP EIR also identified significant impacts at two CMP Freeway Mainline Segments on Route 210. However, these intersections and CMP Freeway Mainline Segments on Route 210 are not within the FOOG Specific Plan area.
The GP EIR also concluded that there was no feasible mitigation to reduce CMP impacts to a less than significant level, as improvements to road capacity would require changes to road infrastructure, which would have secondary impacts such as loss of bicycle lanes, parking, sidewalk space, etc. that would conflict with General Plan goals and policies and would cause other impacts to traffic and transportation. As such, this impact was determined to be significant and unavoidable. Finally, the GP EIR found that under buildout, project circulation improvements would be designed to adequately address potentially hazardous conditions (sharp curves, etc.), potential conflicting uses, and emergency access. The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that no portion of the City is located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of an airport. As such, the General Plan Update would not affect air traffic patterns and no impact would occur.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
Roadways and mobility within the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area were analyzed within the GP EIR; the proposed FOOG Specific Plan does not include modifications to roadways and infrastructure outside of the project area analyzed in the GP EIR. While the modifications within the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would permit more residential units and uses, thus accommodating population growth, like the GP EIR concluded, the circulation improvements to which the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would contribute – improved sidewalk zones, bicycle and pedestrian accessibility, parking, proximity to live/work/shop for residents, allowing more residential and mixed use development within a half-mile radius of the Metro A Line Memorial Park station – would be beneficial for the community and City as a whole. Further, per GP EIR Mitigation Measure 13-1, each project developed under buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would be subject to whatever transportation impact fee is in effect at the time of permitting, thus ensuring that funds for future improvements would be available. Additionally, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would support the Department of Transportation’s Bicycle Transportation Action Plan by reinforcing pedestrian-friendly design and development and requiring bicycle parking. As such, and considering the availability of transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities in the FOOG Specific Plan area, impacts from the FOOG Specific Plan related to proximity and quality of bicycle networks, proximity and quality of transit networks, Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
pedestrian accessibility, and mixed-uses in proximity to the Metro A Line would be less than significant. According to the GP EIR, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan area does not include CMP intersections where traffic impacts would occur.
Regardless, the Los Angeles County CMP has been dissolved. Additionally, as indicated in the IS prepared for the GP EIR, there are no airports within two miles of the City. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not affect air traffic patterns and no impact would occur.
The current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist also recommends considering a project’s potential to conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b), which requires the use of VMT as the updated measurement of traffic impacts, replacing the level of service (LOS) method previously used. As discussed, the GP EIR included a City-wide VMT analysis for impacts to traffic and transportation based on calculations for VMT per capita and VT per capita. The analysis used the City of Pasadena Travel Demand Forecasting (TDF) Model, which was validated to 2013 traffic conditions and later updated to reflect 2017 conditions. Both the 2013 and 2017 models assumed that the I710 extension would be constructed by 2035, which is no longer a valid assumption. As such, an assessment was Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
conducted to update the model to reflect the 2035 horizon year without the I-710 extension.12 This assessment concluded that there were no substantial deviations from the VMT and VT analyses with the removal of the I-710 from the model.
Thus, both versions of the Pasadena TDF Model are consistent with the changes to the CEQA metrics establishing VMT as the measurement of traffic impacts. Additionally, buildout of the FOOG Specific Plan would be within the General Plan buildout analyzed in the GP EIR. As such, the VMT analysis previously prepared for the GP EIR would also be applicable to the FOOG Specific Plan. Further, it should be noted that there is no development project identified under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan. Rather, future development projects would implement the land use and design modifications proposed in the FOOG Specific Plan. Future residential development projects consisting of 50 or more dwelling units and nonresidential development projects greater than 50,000 square feet in size would be required to include a VMT assessment as part the environmental documentation prepared for that project. As such, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), and the impact would be less than significant. 12 Pasadena Future Year TDF Model Update and New VMT/VT Metrics Memorandum, Fehr & Peers, October 2020.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur, nor would the significant unavoidable impacts identified in the GP EIR be worsened.
Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
XVIII.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater
treatment requirements
of the applicable
Regional Water Quality
Control Board?
LTS LTS No No No No
b) Require or result in the
construction of new
water or wastewater
treatment facilities or
expansion of existing
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
facilities, the construction
of which could cause
significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the
construction of new
storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the
construction of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
d) Have sufficient water
supplies available to
serve the project from
existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements
needed?
LTS LTS No No No No
e) Result in a determination
by the wastewater
treatment provider, which
serves or may serve the
project that it has
adequate capacity to
LTS LTS No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
serve the project’s
projected demand in
addition to the provider’s
existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill
with sufficient permitted
capacity to
accommodate the
project’s solid waste
disposal needs?
LTS LTS No No No No
g) Comply with federal,
state, and local NI NI (IS) No No No No
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
management and
reduction statutes and
regulations related to
solid waste?
Discussion:
The GP EIR found that regarding wastewater treatment and collection, services provided by the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County Public Works Department, and PWP would adequately manage wastewater generated by buildout of the General Plan Update. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, such as payment of development fees and implementation of a site-specific Storm Water Pollution Preventions Plan for construction, the impact would be less than significant. Regarding water supply and distribution, the GP EIR found that buildout of the General Plan Update would fall within projections for PWP’s capacity; project requirements would be met by current services provided by PWP. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
approval, such as implementation of mandatory conservation measures, requiring the preparation of a Water Supply Assessment for development projects meeting certain size criteria, and requiring affirmative verification of sufficient water supply for certain residential subdivisions pursuant to SB 221, the impact would be less than significant. Regarding solid waste, the GP EIR found that project buildout would be accommodated by existing service providers and facilities. Upon implementation of regulatory requirements and standard conditions of approval, such as the inclusion of storage areas for recyclable materials at future nonresidential and multifamily residential development projects pursuant to AB 341, recycling at least 50 percent of construction and demolition waste pursuant to the California Green Building Code, and solid waste reduction strategies under General Plan Policies 10.2 and 10.4, the impact would be less than significant.
Regarding other utilities, including electricity, natural gas, and communications, the GP EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update would be accommodated by existing service providers, and the impact would be less than significant. The GP EIR found that the project satisfied and complied with the City’s adopted General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element pertaining to water conservation, General Plan Safety Element pertaining to Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
continued earthquake strengthening for utilities and protection of water supply, and state codes and regulations pertaining to utility services, and that the proposed updates to the General Plan Land Use Element regarding energy and water efficiency and conservation and solid waste reduction would create more sustainable standards for the future of the City.
The IS prepared for the GP EIR found that buildout of the General Plan Update would be required to comply with all applicable solid waste regulations, including the California Integrated Waste Management Act and the City of Pasadena Zoning Code Section 17.40.120 (Refuse Storage Facilities) and, as such, no impact related to compliance with solid waste regulations would occur.
The proposed FOOG Specific Plan area is within the area analyzed by the GP EIR, and the same service providers would manage utility services for future development projects under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update. The proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update would further restrict land uses from those analyzed in the GP EIR and establish additional development/design standards. While there will be a shift in residential density towards the Metro A Line, the FOOG Specific Plan area is primarily built out under existing conditions and buildout of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update would Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
not exceed the projected growth analyzed in the GP EIR. Therefore, the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update is not anticipated to exceed the capacity of existing utility facilities and no new or expanded facilities are anticipated to be needed to service build out of the FOOG Specific Plan. Similar to the General Plan Update, future projects implemented under the FOOG Specific Plan Update would be required to adhere to all applicable solid waste regulations. Therefore, implementation of the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update would have no impact related to compliance with solid waste regulations.
The current CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist also includes assessment criteria for potential impacts related to the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities. Similar to water, wastewater, and solid waste facilities, existing service providers would manage electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications services for projects under the proposed FOOG Specific Plan Update. As discussed, the FOOG Specific Planarea is primarily built out under existing conditions. Thus, it is anticipated that any new development in the FOOG Specific Plan area would require lateral connections to mainlines in coordination with utility service providers, similar Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Issues and Supporting
Data Sources:
FOOG
Update
Impact
Conclusion
GP EIR
Impact
Conclusion
Does the
FOOG
Update
Involve New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those
analyzed in
the GP EIR?
Any New or
Changed
Circumstances
Involving New
Significant
Impacts or
Substantially
More Severe
Impacts than
those analyzed
in the GP EIR?
Any New
Information
of
Substantial
Importance
That Was
Not and
Could Not
Have Been
Known at
the Time of
Certification
of the GP
EIR that
Rises to the
Level of
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Are Any
New
Mitigation
Measures
Required
for the
FOOG
Update?
to what occurs under existing conditions. Therefore, the FOOG Specific Plan Update would result in less than significant impacts related to the relocation or construction of new or expanded electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities.
No new significant impacts and no substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts associated with the proposed project would occur. Likewise, there is no new information of substantial importance requiring new analysis or verification. The project does not propose substantial changes that require major revisions to the GP EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Page Intentionally Left Blank
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks-Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Environmental Determination
Based upon the evidence in light of the whole record documented in the attached environmental checklist explanation, cited incorporations and attachments, I find that the Project:
Has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document (which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings) adopted/certified pursuant to State and City CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project is a component of the whole action analyzed in the previously adopted/certified CEQA document.
Has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document (which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings) adopted/certified pursuant to State and City CEQA Guidelines. Changes and additions to the earlier CEQA document are needed to make the previous documentation adequate to cover the project which are documented in this Addendum (CEQA Guidelines §15164). However, none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
Has previously been analyzed as part of an earlier CEQA document (which either mitigated the project or adopted impacts pursuant to findings) adopted/certified pursuant to State and City CEQA Guidelines. However, there is important new information and/or substantial changes have occurred requiring the preparation of an additional CEQA document (Negative Declaration or EIR) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15163.
Prepared By Date Reviewed By Date
_______________________
Printed Name Printed Name
Addendum approved on: ______________________
Approval attested to by: _______________________ ________ Signature Date
_________________________________
Printed Name
Chapter 3: Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Fair Oaks-Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Page Intentionally Left Blank
Chapter 4: Mitigation Measures Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
CHAPTER 4
MITIGATION MEASURES
The mitigation measures listed below are from the Pasadena General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report and would be applicable to the proposed project. No new mitigation measures are required as a result of implementing the proposed project. The City, as the CEQA lead agency, is responsible for monitoring the implementation of the adopted mitigation measures.
Air Quality
2-1 Prior to issuance of any construction permits, development project applicants shall prepare and submit to the City of Pasadena Planning Division a technical assessment evaluating potential project construction-related air quality impacts. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) methodology for assessing air quality impacts. If construction-related criteria air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the SCAQMD-adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Pasadena Planning Division shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities. These identified measures shall be incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City’s Planning Division. Mitigation measures to reduce construction-related emissions include, but are not limited to:
• Requiring fugitive-dust control measures that exceed SCAQMD’s Rule 403, such as:
• Use of nontoxic soil stabilizers to reduce wind erosion. • Applying water every four hours to active soil-disturbing activities. • Tarping and/or maintaining a minimum of 24 inches of freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials.
• Using construction equipment rated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emission limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower.
• Ensuring that construction equipment is properly serviced and maintained to the manufacturer’s standards.
• Limiting nonessential idling of construction equipment to no more than five consecutive minutes.
• Using Super-Compliant volatile organic compound (VOC) paints for coating of architectural surfaces whenever possible. A list of Super-Compliant Chapter 4: Mitigation Measures Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
architectural coating manufactures can be found on the SCAQMD’s website at http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/brochures/Super-Compliant_AIM.pdf. 2-2 Prior to future discretionary project approval, development project applicants shall prepare and submit to the City of Pasadena Planning Division a technical assessment evaluating potential project operation phase-related air quality impacts. The evaluation shall be prepared in conformance with SCAQMD methodology in assessing air quality impacts. If operation-related air pollutants are determined to have the potential to exceed the SCAQMD-adopted thresholds of significance, the City of Pasadena Planning Division shall require that applicants for new development projects incorporate mitigation measures to reduce air pollutant emissions during operational activities. The identified measures shall be included as part of the Standard Conditions of Approval.
Below are possible mitigation measures to reduce long-term emissions:
• For site-specific development that requires refrigerated vehicles, the construction documents shall demonstrate an adequate number of electrical service connections at loading docks for plug-in of the anticipated number of refrigerated trailers to reduce idling time and emissions. • Applicants for manufacturing and light industrial uses shall consider energy storage and combined heat and power in appropriate applications to optimize renewable energy generation systems and avoid peak energy use. • Site-specific developments with truck delivery and loading areas and truck parking spaces shall include signage as a reminder to limit idling of vehicles while parked for loading/unloading in accordance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2845 (13 California Code of Regulations Chapter 10 § 2485).
• Site-specific development shall demonstrate that an adequate number of electrical vehicle Level 2 charging stations are provided onsite. The location of the electrical outlets shall be specified on building plans, and proper installation shall be verified by the Building Division prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
• Applicant-provided appliances shall be Energy Star appliances (e.g., dishwashers, refrigerators, clothes washers, and dryers). Installation of Energy Star appliances shall be verified by the Building & Safety Division during plan check.
• Applicants for future development projects along existing and planned transit routes shall coordinate with the City of Pasadena, Metro, and Foothill Transit to ensure that bus pads and shelters are incorporated, as appropriate.
2-3 Prior to future discretionary project approval, applicants for new industrial or warehousing land uses that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating dieselpowered transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive Chapter 4: Mitigation Measures Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
land use (e.g., residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Pasadena Planning Division. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceeds the respective thresholds, as established by the SCAQMD at the time a project is considered, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that best available control technologies for toxics (T-BACTs), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms, are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level. T-BACTs may include, but are not limited to, restricting idling onsite or electrifying warehousing docks to reduce diesel particulate matter, or requiring use of newer equipment and/or vehicles.
T-BACTs identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan. 2-4 Prior to future discretionary approval, the City of Pasadena Planning Division shall evaluate new development proposals for sensitive land uses (e.g., residences, schools, and day care centers) within the City for potential incompatibilities with regard to the California Air Resources Board’s Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (April 2005). In addition, applicants for siting or expanding sensitive land uses that are within the recommended buffer distances listed in Table 1-1 of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Handbook shall submit a HRA to the City of Pasadena. The HRA shall be prepared in accordance with policies and procedures of the state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the SCAQMD. The latest OEHHA guidelines shall be used for the analysis, including age sensitivity factors, breathing rates, and body weights appropriate for children. If the HRA shows that the incremental cancer risk and/or noncancer hazard index exceeds the respective thresholds, as established by the SCAQMD at the time a project is considered, the applicant will be required to identify and demonstrate that mitigation measures are capable of reducing potential cancer and noncancer risks to an acceptable level (i.e., below the aforementioned thresholds as established by the SCAQMD), including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. Measures to reduce risk may include but are not limited to:
• Air intakes oriented away from high-volume roadways and/or truck loading zones.
• Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems of the buildings provided with appropriately sized maximum efficiency rating value (MERV) filters. • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning systems for units that are installed with MERV filters shall maintain positive pressure within the building’s filtered ventilation system to reduce infiltration of unfiltered outdoor air.
Chapter 4: Mitigation Measures Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026
Mitigation measures identified in the HRA shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site development plan as a component of the proposed project. The air intake design and MERV filter requirements shall be noted and/or reflected on all building plans submitted to the City and shall be verified by the City’s Planning Division. The intent of this mitigation measure is to reflect current CARB and SCAQMD Guidance/Standards as well as CEQA legislation and case law, and the City implementation of the measure shall adhere to current standards/law at the time such analyses are undertaken.
2-5 Prior to future discretionary approval, if it is determined that a project has the potential to emit nuisance odors beyond the property line, an odor management plan shall be prepared by the project applicant, subject to review and approval by the Planning & Community Development Director or their designee.
Facilities that have the potential to generate nuisance odors include but are not limited to:
• Wastewater treatment plants
• Composting, green waste, or recycling facilities
• Fiberglass manufacturing facilities
• Painting/coating operations
• Large-capacity coffee roasters
• Food-processing facilities
The odor management plan shall show compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 402 for nuisance odors. The Odor Management Plan shall identify the T-BACTs that will be utilized to reduce potential odors to acceptable levels, including appropriate enforcement mechanisms. T-BACTs may include but are not limited to scrubbers (i.e., air pollution control devices) at the industrial facility. T-BACTs identified in the odor management plan shall be identified as mitigation measures in the environmental document and/or incorporated into the site plan.
Biological Resources
3-1 The City of Pasadena shall require applicants of future development projects that disturb undeveloped land in the San Rafael Hills and tract of land at the northwest intersection of Crestford Drive and Florecita Drive, to prepare a biological resources survey. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist and shall be a reconnaissance level field survey of the project site for the presence and quality of biological resources potentially affected by project development. These resources include, but are not limited to, special status species or their habitat, sensitive habitats such as wetlands or riparian areas, and jurisdictional waters. If sensitive or protected biological resources are absent from the project site and adjacent lands potentially affected by the Chapter 4: Mitigation Measures Fair Oaks Orange Grove Specific Plan Update Addendum to the Pasadena General Plan EIR September 2026