Paso Robles City Council
April 4, 2023

8 6. Miscellaneous
a) The State or any CA Participating Subdivision may bring a motion or action in the court where the State has filed its Consent Judgment to enforce the requirements of this CA Distributor Allocation Agreement. Before filing such a motion or action the State will meet and confer with any CA Participating Subdivision that is the subject of the anticipated motion or action, and vice versa.
b) Except as provided in the Distributor Settlement Agreement, this CA Distributor Allocation Agreement is not enforceable by any party other than the State and the CA Participating Subdivisions. It does not confer any rights or remedies upon, and shall not be enforceable by, any third party.
c) Except as provided in the CA Distributor Allocation Agreement, if any provision of this agreement or the application thereof to any person, entity, or circumstance shall, to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this agreement, or the application of such provision to persons, entities, or circumstances other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, will not be affected thereby, and each other provision of this agreement will be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. d) Except as provided in the Distributor Settlement Agreement, this agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of California.

Attachment 6

APPENDIX 1
DISCLAIMER: The allocation percentages herein are estimates only and should not be relied on for decisions regarding legal rights, releases, waivers, or other decisions affecting current or potential legal claims. Percentages shown in the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage column may change pursuant to Section 4.C. of the California State-Subdivision Agreement Regarding Distribution and Use of Settlement Funds—Distributor Settlement, whereas the percentages shown in the Abatement Percentage column should not change. Participating Subdivisions, underlying calculations, and the calculated allocation percentages are subject to change. Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” pursuant to Section 4.B.e., the State of California will receive the Local Allocation share of any payment to the Settlement Fund that is attributable to a county or city that is eligible to become a CAParticipating Subdivision, but that has not, as of the date of that payment to the Settlement Fund, become a Participating Subdivision.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” payments allocated to a Plaintiff Subdivision, which is not an Initial Participating Subdivision, will be re-allocated among the Plaintiff Subdivisions that are Initial Participating Subdivisions.

Regarding the column herein entitled “Abatement Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Abatement Account Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.B. Regarding the column herein entitled “Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to one-hundred percent (100%) of the California Subdivision Funds received, pursuant to Section 4.C. Regarding the column herein entitled “Weighted Allocation Percentage,” the annotation of “100%” refers to onehundred percent (100%) of the combined and weighted allocation of the Abatement Percentage and the Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage.

Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
100.000% 100.000% 100.000%
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage County Alameda County Alameda 2.332% 2.853% 2.4237952%
City Alameda Alameda 0.069% 0.0570162%City Albany Alameda 0.013% 0.0107768%City Berkeley Alameda 0.152% 0.1249656%City Dublin Alameda 0.033% 0.040% 0.0338810%City Emeryville Alameda 0.023% 0.0185765%City Fremont Alameda 0.108% 0.0888576%City Hayward Alameda 0.117% 0.0966218%City Livermore Alameda 0.054% 0.0446740%City Newark Alameda 0.026% 0.0217626%City Oakland Alameda 0.486% 0.595% 0.5055601%City Piedmont Alameda 0.014% 0.0114064%City Pleasanton Alameda 0.067% 0.0554547%City San Leandro Alameda 0.039% 0.0321267%City Union City Alameda 0.043% 0.0352484% County Amador County Amador 0.226% 0.277% 0.2349885%County Butte County Butte 1.615% 1.975% 1.6783178% City Chico Butte 0.216% 0.264% 0.2246499%City Oroville Butte 0.079% 0.0646595% County Calaveras County Calaveras 0.226% 0.277% 0.2351644%County Colusa County Colusa 0.059% 0.0489221%County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 2.102% 2.571% 2.1844585% City Antioch Contra Costa 0.037% 0.0301879%City Brentwood Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0215339%City Clayton Contra Costa 0.002% 0.0018060%City Concord Contra Costa 0.055% 0.0456676%City Danville Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0082255%City El Cerrito Contra Costa 0.023% 0.0189024%City Hercules Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0078273% 1 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Lafayette Contra Costa 0.006% 0.0046030%City Martinez Contra Costa 0.012% 0.0098593%City Moraga Contra Costa 0.004% 0.0031007%City Oakley Contra Costa 0.010% 0.0079416% City Orinda Contra Costa 0.005% 0.0038157%City Pinole Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0110909% City Pittsburg Contra Costa 0.053% 0.0436369%
City Pleasant Hill Contra Costa 0.013% 0.0106309%City Richmond Contra Costa 0.146% 0.1201444% City San Pablo Contra Costa 0.018% 0.0148843%
City San Ramon Contra Costa 0.021% 0.0176459%
City Walnut Creek Contra Costa 0.026% 0.0212132%
County Del Norte County Del Norte 0.114% 0.140% 0.1189608%County El Dorado County El Dorado 0.768% 0.939% 0.7980034% City Placerville El Dorado 0.015% 0.0127642%City South Lake Tahoe El Dorado 0.081% 0.0665456% County Fresno County Fresno 1.895% 2.318% 1.9693410%
City Clovis Fresno 0.065% 0.0536211%
City Coalinga Fresno 0.012% 0.0098554%City Fresno Fresno 0.397% 0.3270605%City Kerman Fresno 0.005% 0.0042534% City Kingsburg Fresno 0.008% 0.0066167%City Mendota Fresno 0.002% 0.0019387% City Orange Cove Fresno 0.004% 0.0035607%
City Parlier Fresno 0.008% 0.0069755%
City Reedley Fresno 0.012% 0.0098804%City Sanger Fresno 0.018% 0.0146135%City Selma Fresno 0.015% 0.0127537% County Glenn County Glenn 0.107% 0.131% 0.1116978%County Humboldt County Humboldt 1.030% 1.260% 1.0703185% 2 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Arcata Humboldt 0.054% 0.0447660%
City Eureka Humboldt 0.117% 0.143% 0.1216284%
City Fortuna Humboldt 0.032% 0.0266837%
County Imperial County Imperial 0.258% 0.315% 0.2679006% City Brawley Imperial 0.011% 0.0087986%
City Calexico Imperial 0.019% 0.0152799%City El Centro Imperial 0.158% 0.1302522%City Imperial Imperial 0.006% 0.0048791% County Inyo County Inyo 0.073% 0.089% 0.0754413%County Kern County Kern 2.517% 3.079% 2.6159145% City Arvin Kern 0.006% 0.0046425%City Bakersfield Kern 0.212% 0.1747198%City California City Kern 0.009% 0.0070820%City Delano Kern 0.030% 0.0249316% City McFarland Kern 0.003% 0.0025644%
City Ridgecrest Kern 0.015% 0.0120938%City Shafter Kern 0.013% 0.0103417% City Tehachapi Kern 0.009% 0.0073580%City Wasco Kern 0.008% 0.0069861% County Kings County Kings 0.293% 0.2413469%
City Avenal Kings 0.007% 0.0056335%
City Corcoran Kings 0.013% 0.0107032%
City Hanford Kings 0.027% 0.0226038%City Lemoore Kings 0.016% 0.0131900% County Lake County Lake 0.795% 0.6545389%
City Clearlake Lake 0.041% 0.050% 0.0426253%City Lakeport Lake 0.021% 0.026% 0.0222964% County Lassen County Lassen 0.319% 0.391% 0.3320610%
City Susanville Lassen 0.027% 0.0219295%
County Los Angeles County Los Angeles 13.896% 16.999% 14.4437559% 3 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Agoura Hills Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040024%
City Alhambra Los Angeles 0.042% 0.0343309%
City Arcadia Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0267718%
City Artesia Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0005100%
City Azusa Los Angeles 0.026% 0.0210857%City Baldwin Park Los Angeles 0.027% 0.0218520% City Bell Los Angeles 0.008% 0.0068783%
City Bellflower Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0014485%City Bell Gardens Los Angeles 0.014% 0.0114301% City Beverly Hills Los Angeles 0.065% 0.0534897%City Burbank Los Angeles 0.100% 0.0823132% City Calabasas Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048948%
City Carson Los Angeles 0.019% 0.0159805%City Cerritos Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039682% City Claremont Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0082584%City Commerce Los Angeles 0.000% 0.0002971%City Compton Los Angeles 0.044% 0.0361882% City Covina Los Angeles 0.028% 0.0229127%
City Cudahy Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006020%
City Culver City Los Angeles 0.055% 0.0449894%City Diamond Bar Los Angeles 0.001% 0.0006993% City Downey Los Angeles 0.052% 0.0429994%City Duarte Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0027261% City El Monte Los Angeles 0.031% 0.038% 0.0318985%
City El Segundo Los Angeles 0.033% 0.0268020%
City Gardena Los Angeles 0.034% 0.0278088%
City Glendale Los Angeles 0.166% 0.1366586%City Glendora Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134411% City Hawaiian Gardens Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0040549%City Hawthorne Los Angeles 0.050% 0.0407833% 4 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Hermosa Beach Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0145307%City Huntington Park Los Angeles 0.023% 0.0190667% City Inglewood Los Angeles 0.059% 0.0489195%City La Cañada Flintridge Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0025565%City Lakewood Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039971% City La Mirada Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0081572%City Lancaster Los Angeles 0.045% 0.0369689%City La Puente Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012999%City La Verne Los Angeles 0.024% 0.0194190% City Lawndale Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0017731%City Lomita Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0031940%City Long Beach Los Angeles 0.439% 0.3614151%City Los Angeles Los Angeles 2.715% 3.321% 2.8218811%City Lynwood Los Angeles 0.016% 0.0134345%City Malibu Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0019269% City Manhattan Beach Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260686%City Maywood Los Angeles 0.004% 0.0035528%City Monrovia Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0254455% City Montebello Los Angeles 0.030% 0.0250670%City Monterey Park Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0256677% City Norwalk Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0258228%City Palmdale Los Angeles 0.046% 0.0375827%City Palos Verdes Estates Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0053102%City Paramount Los Angeles 0.011% 0.0091483% City Pasadena Los Angeles 0.146% 0.1200524%
City Pico Rivera Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0183333%City Pomona Los Angeles 0.111% 0.0911933% City Rancho Palos Verdes Los Angeles 0.002% 0.0012645%City Redondo Beach Los Angeles 0.062% 0.0506992%City Rosemead Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0028260% 5 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City San Dimas Los Angeles 0.003% 0.0022016%
City San Fernando Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0104837%City San Gabriel Los Angeles 0.018% 0.0147726% City San Marino Los Angeles 0.009% 0.0073791%
City Santa Clarita Los Angeles 0.022% 0.0178167%City Santa Fe Springs Los Angeles 0.031% 0.0257531% City Santa Monica Los Angeles 0.158% 0.1298513%City Sierra Madre Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0048646% City Signal Hill Los Angeles 0.010% 0.0084884%City South El Monte Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039603% City South Gate Los Angeles 0.020% 0.0166272%
City South Pasadena Los Angeles 0.012% 0.0095334%
City Temple City Los Angeles 0.005% 0.0039498%City Torrance Los Angeles 0.112% 0.0919820%City Walnut Los Angeles 0.006% 0.0047305%City West Covina Los Angeles 0.049% 0.0404521%City West Hollywood Los Angeles 0.013% 0.0108517% City Whittier Los Angeles 0.032% 0.0260581%
County Madera County Madera 0.349% 0.427% 0.3630669%
City Chowchilla Madera 0.012% 0.0097332%City Madera Madera 0.039% 0.0318441% County Marin County Marin 0.564% 0.690% 0.5861325%
City Larkspur Marin 0.015% 0.0124697%City Mill Valley Marin 0.020% 0.0168401%City Novato Marin 0.028% 0.0229824% City San Anselmo Marin 0.009% 0.0078062%
City San Rafael Marin 0.089% 0.0729823%
County Mariposa County Mariposa 0.084% 0.103% 0.0876131%County Mendocino County Mendocino 0.439% 0.536% 0.4558394% City Ukiah Mendocino 0.039% 0.0317153%
6 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage County Merced County Merced 0.551% 0.674% 0.5724262%
City Atwater Merced 0.024% 0.0195846%City Livingston Merced 0.006% 0.0045873%City Los Banos Merced 0.020% 0.0165142%City Merced Merced 0.061% 0.0500762% County Modoc County Modoc 0.065% 0.080% 0.0678250%County Mono County Mono 0.023% 0.029% 0.0242606%County Monterey County Monterey 0.908% 1.111% 0.9437083% City Greenfield Monterey 0.006% 0.0050552%City King City Monterey 0.005% 0.0037355%City Marina Monterey 0.017% 0.0144098%City Monterey Monterey 0.041% 0.0336540%City Pacific Grove Monterey 0.009% 0.0074842%City Salinas Monterey 0.094% 0.0776576%City Seaside Monterey 0.023% 0.0191772%City Soledad Monterey 0.007% 0.0060870% County Napa County Napa 0.288% 0.352% 0.2994325%
City American Canyon Napa 0.017% 0.0136869%City Napa Napa 0.078% 0.0642783% County Nevada County Nevada 0.441% 0.539% 0.4579827%
City Grass Valley Nevada 0.024% 0.0197805%City Truckee Nevada 0.003% 0.0023843% County Orange County Orange 4.364% 5.339% 4.5363576%
City Aliso Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0113841%City Anaheim Orange 0.554% 0.678% 0.5759282%City Brea Orange 0.086% 0.0708897%City Buena Park Orange 0.087% 0.0714352%City Costa Mesa Orange 0.124% 0.152% 0.1288366%City Cypress Orange 0.033% 0.0271937%City Dana Point Orange 0.001% 0.0005560% 7 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Fountain Valley Orange 0.055% 0.0455980%City Fullerton Orange 0.137% 0.168% 0.1425744% City Garden Grove Orange 0.213% 0.1752482%City Huntington Beach Orange 0.247% 0.302% 0.2568420%City Irvine Orange 0.139% 0.170% 0.1442350% City Laguna Beach Orange 0.047% 0.058% 0.0493043%City Laguna Hills Orange 0.014% 0.0115457%City Laguna Niguel Orange 0.001% 0.0007071%City Laguna Woods Orange 0.001% 0.0006546% City La Habra Orange 0.060% 0.073% 0.0621049%
City Lake Forest Orange 0.012% 0.0101249%
City La Palma Orange 0.012% 0.0095439%City Los Alamitos Orange 0.008% 0.0069190% City Mission Viejo Orange 0.014% 0.0117560%
City Newport Beach Orange 0.179% 0.1470134%
City Orange Orange 0.150% 0.1231320%City Placentia Orange 0.029% 0.035% 0.0298912%City Rancho Santa Margarita Orange 0.001% 0.0006296%City San Clemente Orange 0.008% 0.010% 0.0086083%City San Juan Capistrano Orange 0.008% 0.0065510% City Santa Ana Orange 0.502% 0.614% 0.5213866%
City Seal Beach Orange 0.020% 0.0165891%City Stanton Orange 0.035% 0.0291955% City Tustin Orange 0.073% 0.0600341%
City Westminster Orange 0.104% 0.127% 0.1082721%City Yorba Linda Orange 0.044% 0.0362223% County Placer County Placer 1.045% 1.278% 1.0861002%
City Auburn Placer 0.017% 0.0141114%City Lincoln Placer 0.031% 0.0255599%City Rocklin Placer 0.076% 0.0625485% 8 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Roseville Placer 0.196% 0.1616559%
County Plumas County Plumas 0.205% 0.251% 0.2128729%County Riverside County Riverside 4.534% 5.547% 4.7128296% City Banning Riverside 0.017% 0.0143848%
City Beaumont Riverside 0.021% 0.0171135%City Blythe Riverside 0.012% 0.0096714% City Canyon Lake Riverside 0.000% 0.0001761%City Cathedral City Riverside 0.067% 0.0553614%City Coachella Riverside 0.021% 0.0173054%City Corona Riverside 0.147% 0.1207083% City Desert Hot Springs Riverside 0.024% 0.0200433%City Eastvale Riverside 0.000% 0.0002747%City Hemet Riverside 0.051% 0.0421792% City Indio Riverside 0.056% 0.0457794%
City Jurupa Valley Riverside 0.001% 0.0008991%
City Lake Elsinore Riverside 0.021% 0.0172949%City La Quinta Riverside 0.063% 0.0516732%City Menifee Riverside 0.032% 0.0260909% City Moreno Valley Riverside 0.137% 0.1130348%
City Murrieta Riverside 0.048% 0.059% 0.0497423%
City Norco Riverside 0.016% 0.0134542%City Palm Desert Riverside 0.083% 0.0682465% City Palm Springs Riverside 0.076% 0.0629862%
City Perris Riverside 0.009% 0.0076774%City Rancho Mirage Riverside 0.052% 0.0431098%City Riverside Riverside 0.268% 0.2206279% City San Jacinto Riverside 0.010% 0.0085936%
City Temecula Riverside 0.022% 0.0180086%City Wildomar Riverside 0.008% 0.0062500% County Sacramento County Sacramento 3.797% 4.645% 3.9465887% 9 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Citrus Heights Sacramento 0.057% 0.0465312%
City Elk Grove Sacramento 0.130% 0.1066994%
City Folsom Sacramento 0.108% 0.0890850%City Galt Sacramento 0.017% 0.0143704% City Rancho Cordova Sacramento 0.008% 0.0067679%
City Sacramento Sacramento 0.721% 0.882% 0.7496530%
County San Benito County San Benito 0.106% 0.130% 0.1101417% City Hollister San Benito 0.027% 0.0225355%
County San Bernardino County San Bernardino 3.259% 3.987% 3.3878124% City Adelanto San Bernardino 0.008% 0.0066640%
City Apple Valley San Bernardino 0.025% 0.0207360%City Barstow San Bernardino 0.015% 0.0122056%City Chino San Bernardino 0.064% 0.0525893%City Chino Hills San Bernardino 0.001% 0.0006388% City Colton San Bernardino 0.031% 0.0253443%
City Fontana San Bernardino 0.112% 0.0920543%
City Grand Terrace San Bernardino 0.006% 0.0051051%City Hesperia San Bernardino 0.035% 0.0291522% City Highland San Bernardino 0.004% 0.0029061%
City Loma Linda San Bernardino 0.009% 0.0071188%City Montclair San Bernardino 0.039% 0.0322108%City Ontario San Bernardino 0.179% 0.1472934% City Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino 0.084% 0.0689431%City Redlands San Bernardino 0.057% 0.0469150% City Rialto San Bernardino 0.073% 0.0603206%City San Bernardino San Bernardino 0.178% 0.1461880%City Twentynine Palms San Bernardino 0.002% 0.0012605%City Upland San Bernardino 0.052% 0.0424460%City Victorville San Bernardino 0.033% 0.0269400%City Yucaipa San Bernardino 0.016% 0.0128772% 10 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Yucca Valley San Bernardino 0.003% 0.0021228%
County San Diego County San Diego 5.706% 6.980% 5.9309748% City Carlsbad San Diego 0.128% 0.1050485%
City Chula Vista San Diego 0.189% 0.231% 0.1961456%
City Coronado San Diego 0.044% 0.0359095%
City El Cajon San Diego 0.113% 0.0933582%City Encinitas San Diego 0.061% 0.074% 0.0630289%City Escondido San Diego 0.145% 0.1192204% City Imperial Beach San Diego 0.014% 0.0118283%
City La Mesa San Diego 0.055% 0.068% 0.0575593%
City Lemon Grove San Diego 0.022% 0.0183911%
City National City San Diego 0.080% 0.0656808%City Oceanside San Diego 0.213% 0.1753428% City Poway San Diego 0.062% 0.0511040%City San Diego San Diego 1.975% 2.416% 2.0531169% City San Marcos San Diego 0.089% 0.0733897%City Santee San Diego 0.033% 0.0268401% City Solana Beach San Diego 0.017% 0.0138564%City Vista San Diego 0.052% 0.0425144% Consolidated San Francisco San Francisco 3.026% 3.702% 3.1457169% County San Joaquin County San Joaquin 1.680% 2.055% 1.7460399% City Lathrop San Joaquin 0.009% 0.0075394%
City Lodi San Joaquin 0.053% 0.0439484%
City Manteca San Joaquin 0.054% 0.0443454%City Ripon San Joaquin 0.013% 0.0104219%City Stockton San Joaquin 0.313% 0.383% 0.3256176% City Tracy San Joaquin 0.084% 0.0692047%
County San Luis Obispo County San Luis Obispo 0.816% 0.999% 0.8484126% City Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo 0.024% 0.0199053%City Atascadero San Luis Obispo 0.029% 0.0240680% 11 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) San Luis Obispo 0.043% 0.0353456%City Grover Beach San Luis Obispo 0.017% 0.0137881%City Morro Bay San Luis Obispo 0.020% 0.0160922%City San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo 0.077% 0.0637841% County San Mateo County San Mateo 1.074% 1.313% 1.1159599% City Belmont San Mateo 0.021% 0.0169860%City Burlingame San Mateo 0.019% 0.0152537%City Daly City San Mateo 0.044% 0.0363880%City East Palo Alto San Mateo 0.013% 0.0103982%City Foster City San Mateo 0.020% 0.0166101%City Half Moon Bay San Mateo 0.004% 0.0031638%City Hillsborough San Mateo 0.013% 0.0110029%City Menlo Park San Mateo 0.015% 0.0126209%City Millbrae San Mateo 0.013% 0.0105836%City Pacifica San Mateo 0.016% 0.0130625%City Redwood City San Mateo 0.056% 0.0463511%City San Bruno San Mateo 0.021% 0.0172161%City San Carlos San Mateo 0.013% 0.0108885%City San Mateo San Mateo 0.052% 0.0425841%City South San Francisco San Mateo 0.043% 0.0353943% County Santa Barbara County Santa Barbara 1.132% 1.385% 1.1768968% City Carpinteria Santa Barbara 0.001% 0.0008938%City Goleta Santa Barbara 0.004% 0.0028969%City Lompoc Santa Barbara 0.047% 0.0389379%City Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 0.122% 0.1004559%City Santa Maria Santa Barbara 0.058% 0.0479179% County Santa Clara County Santa Clara 2.404% 2.941% 2.4987553% City Campbell Santa Clara 0.014% 0.0112566%City Cupertino Santa Clara 0.008% 0.0066824%City Gilroy Santa Clara 0.025% 0.0202891% 12 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Los Altos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103338%City Los Gatos Santa Clara 0.013% 0.0103220%City Milpitas Santa Clara 0.036% 0.0298120% City Morgan Hill Santa Clara 0.015% 0.0124619%
City Mountain View Santa Clara 0.041% 0.0334608%
City Palo Alto Santa Clara 0.039% 0.0323080%
City San Jose Santa Clara 0.294% 0.360% 0.3054960%City Santa Clara Santa Clara 0.067% 0.0549723%City Saratoga Santa Clara 0.004% 0.0034161% City Sunnyvale Santa Clara 0.053% 0.0434069%
County Santa Cruz County Santa Cruz 0.783% 0.957% 0.8135396% City Capitola Santa Cruz 0.020% 0.0168191%City Santa Cruz Santa Cruz 0.143% 0.1180348% City Scotts Valley Santa Cruz 0.015% 0.0126525%City Watsonville Santa Cruz 0.063% 0.0520136% County Shasta County Shasta 1.095% 1.339% 1.1380191%
City Anderson Shasta 0.024% 0.0198896%City Redding Shasta 0.284% 0.2334841% City Shasta Lake Shasta 0.004% 0.0031993%
County Siskiyou County Siskiyou 0.228% 0.279% 0.2373393%County Solano County Solano 0.760% 0.6260795% City Benicia Solano 0.031% 0.0253903%City Dixon Solano 0.016% 0.0130849%City Fairfield Solano 0.109% 0.0897317%City Suisun City Solano 0.021% 0.0176183% City Vacaville Solano 0.119% 0.0976497%City Vallejo Solano 0.167% 0.1373644% County Sonoma County Sonoma 1.218% 1.490% 1.2661290%
City Healdsburg Sonoma 0.032% 0.0266929%City Petaluma Sonoma 0.081% 0.0667507% 13 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Rohnert Park Sonoma 0.041% 0.0340759%
City Santa Rosa Sonoma 0.184% 0.1519070%
City Sonoma Sonoma 0.022% 0.0183438%
City Windsor Sonoma 0.016% 0.0129298%
County Stanislaus County Stanislaus 1.722% 1.4182273%
City Ceres Stanislaus 0.041% 0.0340260%City Modesto Stanislaus 0.217% 0.1788759%City Newman Stanislaus 0.006% 0.0046964%City Oakdale Stanislaus 0.018% 0.0145531% City Patterson Stanislaus 0.015% 0.0126590%
City Riverbank Stanislaus 0.010% 0.0085699%
City Turlock Stanislaus 0.065% 0.0531966%
County Sutter County Sutter 0.306% 0.374% 0.3179548%
City Yuba City Sutter 0.074% 0.0606242%
County Tehama County Tehama 0.213% 0.261% 0.2216654%
City Red Bluff Tehama 0.014% 0.0117771%
County Trinity County Trinity 0.082% 0.101% 0.0855476%County Tulare County Tulare 0.809% 0.990% 0.8410949% City Dinuba Tulare 0.014% 0.0116929%
City Exeter Tulare 0.004% 0.0032479%City Farmersville Tulare 0.003% 0.0027879%City Lindsay Tulare 0.007% 0.0057111% City Porterville Tulare 0.021% 0.0171845%City Tulare Tulare 0.037% 0.0302273%City Visalia Tulare 0.066% 0.0545872% County Tuolumne County Tuolumne 0.486% 0.594% 0.5047621%County Ventura County Ventura 2.192% 2.681% 2.2781201% City Camarillo Ventura 0.002% 0.0012815%City Fillmore Ventura 0.002% 0.0020294%City Moorpark Ventura 0.008% 0.0067337% 14 of 15
Attachment
6

APPENDIX 1
Participating
Subdivision
Classification
Participating Subdivision County Abatement Percentage Plaintiff Subdivision Percentage Weighted Allcation Percentage City Oxnard Ventura 0.156% 0.190% 0.1617338%City Port Hueneme Ventura 0.021% 0.0174145% City San Buenaventura (Ventura) Ventura 0.085% 0.0702181%City Santa Paula Ventura 0.014% 0.0119072%City Simi Valley Ventura 0.065% 0.0533043%City Thousand Oaks Ventura 0.022% 0.0179902% County Yolo County Yolo 0.357% 0.437% 0.3713319%
City Davis Yolo 0.055% 0.0451747%City West Sacramento Yolo 0.066% 0.0544321%City Woodland Yolo 0.058% 0.0477904% County Yuba County Yuba 0.214% 0.262% 0.2225679%
City Marysville Yuba 0.014% 0.0112079%
15 of 15
Attachment
6

1 APPENDIX 2
Cost Reimbursement Procedure

1. Additional defined terms:
a) Costs means the reasonable amounts paid for the attorney and other City Attorney and County Counsel staff time for individuals employed by a Plaintiff Subdivision at the contractual rate, inclusive of benefits and overhead, together with amounts paid for court reporters, experts, copying, electronic research, travel, vendors, and the like, which were paid or incurred (i) prior to July 21, 2021 in litigation against any Opioid Defendant and/or (ii) in negotiating and drafting this CA Distributor Allocation Agreement. Costs does not include attorneys’ fees, costs, or expenses incurred by private contingency fee counsel. No part of the CA Abatement Accounts Fund will be used to reimburse Costs. b) First Claims Date means October 1, 2023 or when all applications for reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section X and Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement or Section XI and Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, have been finally determined under the provisions of those agreements, whichever comes first.
c) Special Master means a retired judicial officer or former public lawyer, not presently employed or retained by a Plaintiff Subdivision, who will aggregate, review, and determine the reasonable Costs to be awarded to each Plaintiff Subdivision that submits a claim for reimbursement of Costs. The Special Master will be selected by a majority vote of the votes cast by Plaintiff Subdivisions, with each such subdivision having one vote. d) Plaintiff Subdivision Committee means the committee of Plaintiff Subdivisions that will review and approve the invoices submitted by the Special Master reflecting his or her reasonable time and expenses.

2. Cost Reimbursement to Plaintiff Subdivision
a) Purpose. Substantial resources have been expended to hold Opioid Defendants accountable for creating and profiting from the opioid crisis, and this effort has been a significant catalyst in creating a National Opioid Settlement with Distributors, Johnson & Johnson, and others.
b) Claims Procedure.
i. If a Plaintiff Subdivision is eligible to seek reimbursement of Costs, in whole or in part, from funds available under Section X or Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement or Section XI or Exhibit R of the Janssen Settlement Agreement, it must first make a timely application for reimbursement from such funds. To allow sufficient time for determination of those applications, no claim for Attachment 6

2 Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund under this Agreement may be made before the First Claims Date.
ii. A Plaintiff Subdivision that wishes to be reimbursed from the CA Subdivision Fund must submit a claim to the Special Master no later than forty-five (45) days after the First Claims Date. The Special Master will then compile and redistribute the aggregated claim totals for each Plaintiff Subdivision via email to representatives of all the Plaintiff Subdivisions. A claim for attorney and staff time must list, for each attorney or staff member included in the claim, the following information: name, title, total hours claimed, hourly rate (including, if sought, benefits and share of overhead), and narrative summarizing the general nature of the work performed by the attorney or staff member. For reimbursement of “hard” costs, the subdivision may aggregate across a category (e.g., total for travel costs). It is the intention of the Plaintiff Subdivisions that submission of documents related to reimbursement of Costs does not waive any attorney-client privilege or exemptions to the California Public Records Act.
iii. The Special Master may request, at his or her sole option, additional documents or details to assist in the final award of Costs.
iv. The Special Master will review claims for reasonableness and will notify each Plaintiff Subdivision of the final determination of its claim, and will provide a list of all final awards to all Plaintiff Subdivisions by email or, upon request, via First Class U.S. Mail. Any Plaintiff Subdivision may ask the Special Master to reconsider any final award within twenty-one (21) days. The Special Master will make a final determination on any such reconsideration request within thirty (30) days of receipt. v. Any decision of the Special Master is final and binding, and will be considered under the California Arbitration Act, Code of Civil Procedure section 1280 et seq. as a final arbitration award. Nothing in this agreement is intended to expand the scope of judicial review of the final award for errors of fact or law, and the Parties agree that they may only seek to vacate the award if clear and convincing evidence demonstrates one of the factors set forth in Code of Civil Procedure, section 1286.2, subdivision (a). Plaintiff Subdivisions will have fourteen (14) days after all final awards are made, together with any final determination of a request for reconsideration, to seek review in the Superior Court of California, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1285, where the State has filed its Consent Judgment. vi. The Special Master will prepare a report of Costs that includes his or her fees and expenses at least ninety (90) days before the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Special Master’s preparation of a report of Costs does not discharge a Plaintiff Subdivision’s reporting requirement under Section V.B.2 of the Distributor Agreement.
vii. A member of the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee, which is a CA Participating Subdivision, will submit to the Settlement Fund Administrator and the Distributors a Attachment 6

3 report of the fees and expenses incurred by the Special Master pursuant to Section V.B.2 of the Distributor Agreement.
c) Claims Priority and Limitation.
i. The Special Master will submit invoices for compensation of reasonable fees and expenses to the Plaintiff Subdivision Committee no later than ninety (90) days prior to the Payment Date for each Annual Payment. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will promptly review and, if reasonable, approve the Special Master’s invoice for compensation. The Plaintiff Subdivision Committee will submit approved invoices to the Settlement Fund Administrator for payment. The Special Master’s approved invoices have priority and will be paid first from the CA Subdivision Fund before any award of Costs, subject to the limitation in Section 2.c.v below. ii. Final Awards of Costs that do not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid next in priority after the Special Master’s approved invoices.
iii. Final Awards of Costs in excess of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00) will be paid proportionally from the funds remaining in that year’s Annual Payment. iv. Any claim for Costs that is not paid in full will be allocated against the next year’s distribution from the CA Subdivision Fund, until all approved claims for Costs are paid in full.
v. In no event will more than 50% of the total CA Subdivision Fund received in any year be used to pay Costs or the Special Master’s approved invoices. vi. In no event shall more than $28 million of the total CA Subdivision Funds paid pursuant to the Distributor Settlement Agreement and the Janssen Settlement Agreement be used to pay Costs.
d) Collateral Source Payments and Third-Party Settlement. i. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision is awarded compensation, in whole or in part, by any source of funds created as a result of litigation against an Opioid Defendant for its reasonable Costs, it will reduce its claim for Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund by that amount. If a Plaintiff Subdivision has already received a final award of Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund, it will repay the fund up to the prior award of Costs via a payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator or notify the Settlement Fund Administrator that its allocation from the next and subsequent Annual Payments should be reduced accordingly. If the Plaintiff Subdivision is repaying any prior award of Costs, that repayment will occur as soon as is feasible after the Plaintiff Subdivision’s receipt of Cost funds from the collateral source, but no more than 90 days after its receipt from the collateral source. The Settlement Fund Administrator will add any repaid Costs to the CA Subdivision Fund.

Attachment 6

4 ii. In the event a Plaintiff Subdivision reaches a monetary settlement or compromise against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement, the monetary portion of such settlement, net of fees paid to outside contingency fee counsel and of funds earmarked strictly for abatement, will be credited against its Costs and the subdivision will be ineligible to recover those credited Costs from the CA Subdivision Fund. Plaintiff Subdivisions negotiating monetary settlements or compromises against any Opioid Defendant outside of the National Opioid Settlement will negotiate for funds to repay any Costs it previously received from the CA Subdivision Fund or for Costs it otherwise might be eligible to claim from the CA Subdivision Fund. If such a settlement is paid after all final approved claims for Costs by all Plaintiff Subdivisions are satisfied in full, the settling subdivision will reimburse the CA Subdivision Fund in that amount by making payment to the Settlement Fund Administrator to add to the CA Subdivision Fund in a manner consistent with the repayments described in section 2.d.i above.

Attachment 6

APPENDIX 3

CALIFORNIA-SUBDIVISION BACKSTOP AGREEMENT
On August 6, 2021, Judge Polster of the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an Order (the Order), docket number 3814, in In Re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL 2804, addressing contingent attorney fee contracts between political subdivisions eligible to participate in the Distributors Settlement and their counsel.

In light of the Order, and at the request of [SUBDIVISION], the [SUBDIVISION], its counsel [COUNSEL], and the California Attorney General, on behalf of the State of California, are entering into this California-Subdivision Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement). [SUBDIVISION] and [COUNSEL] intend this Backstop Agreement to constitute a State BackStop Agreement as that term is used in the Order and in Exhibit R (Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Costs) of the Distributor Settlement Agreement.

Pursuant to this Backstop Agreement, [SUBDIVISION] may, subject to the limitations of the Distributor Settlement Agreement and CA Distributor Allocation Agreement, as well as any other limitations imposed by law, use funds that it receives from the Distributor Settlement CA Subdivision Fund to pay a contingent fee to [COUNSEL]. Any such payment from [SUBDIVISION] to [COUNSEL], together with any contingency fees that [COUNSEL] may receive from the national Attorney Fee Fund, will not exceed a total contingency fee of [PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED 15%] of the total gross recovery of [SUBDIVISION] from the Distributors Settlement.
[COUNSEL] certify that they first sought fees and costs from the Attorney Fee Fund created under the Distributor Settlement Agreement before seeking or accepting payment under this backstop agreement. [COUNSEL] further certify that they are not seeking and will not accept payment under this backstop agreement of any litigation fees or costs that have been reimbursed through prior settlements or judgments.

The Attorney General is executing this agreement solely because the definition of “State BackStop Agreement” in Exhibit R of the Distributor Settlement Agreement requires such agreements to be between “a Settling State” and private counsel for a participating subdivision. Neither the California Attorney General nor the State of California have any obligations under this Backstop Agreement, and this Backstop Agreement does not require the payment of any state funds to [SUBDIVISION], [COUNSEL], or any other party.
[DATE] [SUBDIVISION SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [COUNSEL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
[DATE] [ATTORNEY GENERAL SIGNATURE BLOCK]
Attachment 6

SAMPLE

EXHIBIT K
Subdivision and Special District Settlement Participation Form Will your subdivision or special district be signing the settlement participation forms for the Allergan and Teva Settlements at this time?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
Governmental Entity: San Bernardino County State: CA
Authorized Signatory:

Address 1:

Address 2:

City, State, Zip:

Phone:

Email:

The governmental entity identified above (“Governmental Entity”), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Agreement dated November 22, 2022 (“Allergan Settlement”), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Allergan Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Released Entities, and agrees as follows.

1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Allergan Settlement, understands that all terms in this Election and Release have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by this Election, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Allergan Settlement as provided therein.

2. Following the execution of this Settlement Participation Form, the Governmental Entity shall comply with Section III.B of the Allergan Settlement regarding Cessation of Litigation Activities.

3. The Governmental Entity shall, within fourteen (14) days of the Reference Date and prior to the filing of the Consent Judgment, file a request to dismiss with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed. With respect to any Released Claims pending in In re National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804, the Governmental Entity authorizes the MDL Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee to execute and file on behalf of the Governmental Entity a Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice substantially in the form found at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com.

4. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Allergan Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions and Special Districts as defined therein.

5. By agreeing to the terms of the Allergan Settlement and becoming a Releasor, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date.

6. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Allergan Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein.
1 Attachment 7

SAMPLE

7. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the court in the Governmental Entity’s state where the Consent Judgment is filed for purposes limited to that court’s role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the Allergan Settlement.

8. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce the Allergan Settlement as provided therein.

9. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision or Participating Special District, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Allergan Settlement, including, but not limited to, all provisions of Section V (Release), and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, Subdivisions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity whether elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist in bringing, or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Released Entity in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Allergan Settlement are intended to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Released Entities the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release claims. The Allergan Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim.

10. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision or Participating Special District as set forth in the Allergan Settlement.

11. In connection with the releases provided for in the Allergan Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads:

General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.

A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the Effective Date, any and all Released Claims that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities’ decision to participate in the Allergan Settlement.

12. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Allergan Settlement, to which the Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Settlement Participation Form is interpreted differently from the Allergan Settlement in any respect, the Allergan Settlement controls.
2 Attachment 7

SAMPLE
I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Settlement Participation Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity.

Signature:

Name:

Title:

Date:
3 Attachment 7

Council Agenda Report
From: Freda Berman, Public Works Director
Subject: Approval of New City Park Event – Open Farm Days Farmers Market CEQA Determination: The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, 15304(e)
Date: April 4, 2023
Facts

1. FARMstead ED, a local non-profit organization connecting the community with local farms and agriculture, proposes to stage an Open Farm Days Farmers Market in City Park on Friday, July 14, 2023, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.

2. Open Farm Days Farmers Market is the kickoff event for Open Farm Days weekend where local family farms welcome the public to tour, taste and learn about local agriculture.

3. Approximately 20 farmer vendors and artisans will set up on the east side of City Park near the Gazebo to showcase their products. Attendees will have an opportunity to interact with the farmers and learn about local farms and ranches that produce top quality products.

4. Both regularly scheduled Paso Robles farmers markets, the Tuesday North County Farmers Market and the Saturday Country Farm and Craft Market have endorsed this event.

5. FARMstead ED is responsible for all event logistical support.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve the request of FARMstead ED to stage Open Farm Days Farmers Market on July 14, 2023, in City Park, or;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
FARMstead ED benefits local farms and producers as an agricultural network of likeminded people.

Farmers, makers and end consumers are introduced to who is growing what, and where they can be found on the SLO County Farm Trail. Activities throughout the year include Open Farm Days, workshops and tours. The event is an appropriate addition to the standing schedule of community events in City Park and does not conflict with any other planned activities.

Fiscal Impact
No funding is requested for this event. FARMstead ED is responsible for all costs associated with Open Farm Days Farmers Market.

CEQA Determination
The event is exempt from CEQA under Section 15304(e) of the CEQA Guidelines, as a minor temporary use having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment. If Council approves the recommended action, Recreation Services would process the City’s standard Facility Use Permit, that includes standard waivers and procedures.

Recommendation
Approve the request of FARMstead ED to stage Open Farm Days Farmers Market in City Park on July 14, 2023.

Attachments

1. Event layout

2. Letters of support

Attachment 1

Attachment 2

Attachment 2

Council Agenda Report
From: Freda Berman, Public Works Director
Subject: Approval of New City Park Event – Firestone Walker Invitational Kick Off Party CEQA Determination: The City find that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, 15304(e)
Date: April 4, 2023
Facts

1. The Firestone Walker Brewing Company, working with the Pioneer Day Committee, proposes to stage the Firestone Walker Invitational Kick Off Party in City Park on Thursday, June 1, 2023, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m.

2. The Kick Off Party is a free, family friendly concert geared to residents who may not have the opportunity to attend the ticketed Firestone Walker Invitational Beer Festival held at the Paso Robles Event Center on Saturday, June 3, 2023.

3. Attendees will be able to try Firestone Walker beer and the collaboration beer brewed specifically for the Invitational. Firewalker Walker staff will be on hand to discuss the main brands – Firestone Walker, 805 and Cali Squeeze.

4. All proceeds from the Kick Off Party and the Invitational Beer Festival benefit the Paso Robles Pioneer Day Committee.

5. Firestone Walker is responsible for all event logistical support.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve the request of Firestone Walker to stage the Firestone Walker Invitational Kick Off Party on June 1, 2023, in City Park, or;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
The Firestone Walker Invitational Beer Festival was founded in 2012 and has grown to great renown, attracting breweries from around the world and selling out the limited tickets in a matter of minutes.

Firestone Walker staff and the Pioneer Day Committee would like to offer the local community a taste of the Invitational bringing good music and beer downtown. The event is an appropriate addition to the standing schedule of community events in City Park, is scheduled prior to the 2023 Concert in the Park season and does not conflict with any other planned activities.

Fiscal Impact
No funding is requested for this event. Firestone Walker is responsible for all costs associated with the Kick Off Party.

CEQA Determination
The event is exempt from CEQA under Section 15304(e) of the CEQA Guidelines, as a minor temporary use having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment. If Council approves the recommended action, Recreation Services would process the City’s standard Facility Use Permit, that includes standard waivers and procedures.

Recommendation
Approve the request of the Firestone Walker Brewing Company to stage the Firestone Walker Invitational Kick Off Party in City Park on June 1, 2023.

Attachments

1. Event layout

Attachment 1

Council Agenda Report
From: Matt Thompson, Recycled Water Manager
Subject: Approval of Closing Resolution for Financing of Recycled Water Distribution System CEQA Determination: The City prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and circulated it for public comment (State Clearinghouse #2018051033). The City certified the IS/MND and filed a Notice of Determination on August 24, 2018. This action is consistent with the previously certified MND.

Date: April 4, 2023
Facts

1. The State’s Clean Water Revolving Fund (SRF) loan program provides low interest financing for projects that clean water and expand water recycling in California. SRF has recently been offering grants in combination with low interest loans to incentivize construction of water recycling projects.

2. In 2019, the City completed the first phase of its recycled water program, which is the Tertiary Treatment Facilities at the Wastewater Treatment Plant. These facilities produce high quality recycled water and enable compliance with stringent requirements for discharge to the Salinas River. SRF provided the City a $4 million grant in combination with a low interest loan for completion of the Tertiary Treatment Facilities.

3. The second phase of the recycled water program is a purple pipe system to deliver the recycled water to east Paso Robles for irrigation and recharge of groundwater. This project is named the Paso Robles Recycled Water Distribution System.

4. The Recycled Water Distribution System is a very large capital project. It includes installation of a large pumping station, over 4.5 miles of large diameter water pipeline across the northern part of the City, and a 900,000-gallon storage tank located at east end of the City, near Barney Schwartz Park. The total project cost is currently estimated at $35.4 million (in 2024 dollars, the anticipated mid-point of construction).

5. In 2018, the City applied to SRF for financing for construction of the Recycled Water Distribution System. SRF recently completed a lengthy environmental, financial, and legal review. On March 10, 2023, SRF delivered a financing agreement for the City’s signature and execution. The financing agreement includes a $9,730,000 grant in combination with the low-interest (2.6%) loan. The grant is made possible by President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. A copy of the financing agreement is included as Attachment 1.

6. In order to finalize the financing agreement, SRF requires City Council to approve a Closing Resolution and submit it by April 10, 2023. The resolution is essential to formally receive the financing agreement and reauthorize the Mayor, City Manager, and Utilities Director to sign and execute the financing agreement for the City. The Closing Resolution is included as Attachment 2.

7. In addition to this financing agreement, in 2022 the City received a $3.5 million grant from the State’s Department of Water Resources for completion of a portion of the Recycled Water Distribution System under the Salinas River. The Salinas River Segment will soon be under construction. The City has applied for an additional $5.7 million in grant funding from DWR.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Approve the attached Closing Resolution; or

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
This large grant and low interest loan from SRF will greatly improve the economics of the recycled water program by reducing the per unit cost of recycled water. It would be prudent to adopt the Closing Resolution and secure this excellent financing. If the City secures the financing, it can move ahead with preparing the project plans and specifications for bidding and construction and acquisition of necessary easements. City staff aims to have the project ready for bidding and start of construction by the end of 2023.

Fiscal Impact
The financial plan for the Recycled Water Distribution System is to utilize the City’s Sewer Fund as security for this construction loan. The City intends to sell the recycled water to those who use it for irrigation.

Revenues from recycled water sales will be used to pay the annual debt payments and expenses of operating and maintaining the recycled water system. City staff will work closely with many irrigators in the first three to five years after completion of the system to ensure recycled water use is maximized and revenues grow year after year. The long-term goal is for the recycled water program to become financially self-sufficient (i.e., not dependent on the Sewer Fund).

The financing offered by SRF includes a $9,730,000 grant in combination with a 2.6% annual interest loan with a 30-year payback period. With the project costs described above, this will result in an annual debt payment (principal and interest) of $1,071,134 per year. The first debt payment will not be due until 2027, which is one year after completion of construction. Financial projections for the next seven years indicate the Sewer Fund can take on this additional debt without affecting the Sewer Fund’s ability to pay its other debts or other critical expenses. Again, recycled water revenues will be used to pay this expense and should be sufficient to cover the entire debt payment and operation and maintenance expenses within approximately five years.

Completion of the recycled water system will further diversify the City’s portfolio of water supplies and provide a new source of irrigation water for winegrowers. This will help sustain economic growth in the greater Paso Robles area.

CEQA
The City has fulfilled the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act for the Recycled Water Distribution System project. The City prepared an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and circulated it for public comment (State Clearinghouse #2018051033). The City certified the IS/MND and filed a Notice of Determination on August 24, 2018.

Recommendation (Option 2)
Approve Resolution 23-XXX, authorizing the execution and delivery of and approving a financing agreement with the California State Water Resources Control Board.

Attachments

1. Financing Agreement

2. Resolution 23-XXX - Closing Resolution

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Documents Transmitted back to Adobe by the Recipient:

Steps:

1. Once the Adobe notification has been received, the Recipient will open Adobe. The Recipient must checkmark the box to agree to the Consumer Disclosure. Click on [Accept]

2. The Recipient will need to download the (PDF) documents by selecting the corresponding radio button. Ensure to save the documents to the desired location.

3. Once you have saved the documents to the desired location, the Recipient will proceed with generating the required closing documents. For the documents to be edited, you must save your file in Word format. Click on [File-Export To-Microsoft Word – Word Document]

4. Once the Recipient has completed the closing documents, the file must be saved as “Adobe PDF” for their respective digital signatures to be entered.

5. The Recipient will select [Certificates] from the tools field and using your mouse, click and drag to draw the area where you would like the signature to appear. A dialogue message box will display your Digital ID press [Continue] and click on [Sign]. [Save] Attachment 1

6. The Recipient will attach the signed documents to Adobe by clicking the [Click to Attachment] and downloading the signed document(s).

7. Once the closing document(s) have been attached, the Recipient will click on the [Click to Sign] button.

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 23-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO ROBLES

AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AND APPROVING A FINANCING AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD; AND

AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City of El Paso Robles, a public agency duly organized and existing under and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of California (the “City”), is authorized under provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of California, and in accordance therewith, to incur indebtedness; and WHEREAS, the City owns and operates a wastewater system (such system, including all additions, improvements and extensions thereto, is referred to herein as the “Wastewater System”); and WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the best interests of its constituents to construct and/or reconstruct certain public facilities and improvements relating to its water and wastewater system, including certain treatment facilities, pipelines and other infrastructure (the “Project”) for the Wastewater System; and WHEREAS, the City has applied for and obtained a loan from the California State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”) under the State Revolving Fund Program (the “SRF Loan”) to provide the funds needed to pay for the Project; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the SRF Loan, the City must enter into an Installment Sale Agreement with the State Water Board (the “Financing Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, there has been presented to this meeting the following for approval: Financing Agreement for Project No. C-06-8440-110 between the City and the State Water Board; and WHEREAS, the Financing Agreement is necessary to accomplish the completion and funding of the SRF Loan and eventual distribution of loan proceeds to the City to fund the Project; and WHEREAS, all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of California to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in connection with the entering into of the documents described above.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City hereby specifically finds and declares that the statements, findings and determinations of the City set forth in the preambles of the documents approved herein are true and correct.

Section 2. The Financing Agreement is hereby approved and each of the Mayor, the City Manager, the Utilities Director and their written designees (each an “Authorized Officer” and together, the “Authorized Officers”), acting alone, is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Financing Agreement in the name of and on behalf of the City, in substantially the form now before this meeting, but with such changes, modifications, additions and deletions therein as shall be deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate by the Authorized Officer or Authorized Officers. Approval of any such changes, modifications, additions and deletions shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Financing Agreement by one or more Authorized Officers.

Section 3. Each Authorized Officer is hereby appointed as an authorized officer of the City for all purposes required by the Financing Agreement, and such Authorized Officers are hereby authorized,

Attachment 2
empowered, and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the foregoing actions.

Section 4. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they may deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this Resolution and to effectuate the SRF Loan and the Financing Agreement. Such actions heretofore taken by an Authorized Officer are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage.

APPROVED this 4th day of April, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Steven W. Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Council Agenda Report
From: David Athey, City Engineer
Subject: Conditional Street Abandonments 23-001 (City of Paso Robles) - Portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and Unnamed Alleys – Continued from 3/21/2023
CEQA Determination: This application is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061 (General Rule) of the State’s Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Date: April 4, 2023
Facts

1. The applicant, City of Paso Robles, possesses rights-of-way within the Paso Robles Event Center grounds, as shown on Attachment 1.

2. Abandonment of portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys (Roads) will enable the expansion of the Paso Robles Event Center.

3. The proposed right-of-way abandonments and public utility easement reservations are indicated on Attachment 1.

4. The right-of-ways are not shown in the General Plan for future circulation purposes.

5. The right-of-ways are posted indicating the City’s intent to vacate the right-of-ways.

6. Section 65402(a) of the Government Code provides that “…no street shall be vacated or abandoned, … if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such… street vacation or abandonment… have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof.”

7. The Planning Commission, at its February 28, 2023 meeting, approved findings that the conditional street vacation conforms to the adopted City General Plan(see Attachment No. 5, Planning Commission Resolution 23-011).

8. The Planning Commission added a condition that the Street Abandonments are dependent upon the State of California Approving the Pioneer Park Purchase Acquisition Agreement.

9. This item was noticed and appeared on the March 21, 2023 City Council agenda, however at the request of the State of California, this item was continued to this meeting date to allow the State additional time to review the item.

Options

1. Approve Street Abandonment 23-001, for portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys, and reserving several portions of the right-ofways for water, sewer, stormwater, and public utility easement purposes.

2. Deny Street Abandonment 23-001, for portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys, based on findings.

3. Refer the item back to staff for additional analysis.

Analysis and Conclusions
Project Summary.

The request is to summarily abandon portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys (attachment 1) to allow the expansion of the Paso Robles Event Center. The abandonments will not impact area circulation as Victoria Place and San Luis Avenue are “paper” roads (appearing on a map but not actually used as roads) and Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, and Gregory Avenue only serve the Event Center (for whose benefit the abandonment will occur.) In addition, Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and the unnamed Alleys are not listed in the Circulation element as being needed for future circulation purposes. The City will retain the right-of-ways as City water, sewer, stormwater, and public utility easements because of existing City and Public utilities.

Section 8334 of the State Streets and Highways Code provides that the City Council may vacate a right-of-way of a street not required for street purposes and/or a portion of a street that lies within property under one ownership and that does not continue through such ownership or end touching property of another.

The proposed abandonment complies with all the above terms.

General Plan / Zoning Consistency
The rights-of-way proposed for abandonment serves no current or future purpose as public streets, and are not listed in the General Plan’s Circulation Element for future circulation purposes.

Neighborhood Compatibility/Site Design Issues
This road abandonment request will allow for the expansion of the Paso Robles Event Center, which is currently operating over the properties affected by this abandonment. The Paso Robles Event Center is also purchasing a portion of Pioneer Park; therefore, the abandonment will allow them to further expand.

Public Safety
Abandonment of these right-of-ways does not increase emergency response times or create emergency access issues.

Utilities
The area proposed for abandonment is planned for future use as a utility easement. Therefore, a portion of the area proposed for abandonment must be retained as a sewer, water, stormwater, and public utility easement.

These retained areas are shown on Attachment 1. These easements may be extinguished in the future by a separate action in conformance with the Map Act.

CEQA Determination
This application is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061 (General/Common Sense Rule) of the State’s Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

Fiscal Impact
There is minimal fiscal impact because of this abandonment. The cost of this abandonment is limited to staff time and public noticing.

Recommendation
Approve Resolution 23-XXX, approving the Street Abandonment 23-001, portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys right-of-ways, and reserving portions of the right-of-way for water, sewer, stormwater, and public utility easement purposes.

Attachments

1. Vicinity Map

2. Resolution 23-XXX – City Council Conditional Street Vacation Approval

3. Mail Affidavit

4. Newspaper Affidavit

5. Planning Commission Resolution 23-011

Note: This map is not based
entirely on a field survey, some
lines are calculated from record data.Project File :\\12024Stac.dwgLast Updated : 27 JAN 2023 Exhibit A - Map
Paso Robles Event Center
Legend:

Indicates Streets
to be Vacated
Attachment
1 and Public Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Public Utility Easements to be retained.

Unnamed Alley
Unnamed Alley

Attachment 2
RESOLUTION 23-XXX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES APPROVING STREET ABANDONMENT 23-001
(Portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys)
Gregory’s Subdivision - B/MB/17
WHEREAS, the applicant, the City of Paso Robles, has filed a Street Abandonment application for a summary vacation of portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys (Roads); and
WHEREAS, abandonment of the Roads will enable the expansion of the Paso Robles Event Center; and WHEREAS, the Roads rights-of-way is not shown in the General Plan for future circulation purposes.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 8334, the subject right-of-way may be considered for vacation; and
WHEREAS, Section 65402(a) of the Government Code provides that “…no street shall be vacated or abandoned, … if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such… street vacation or abandonment… has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof”; and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on February 28, 2023, to consider the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this project, and to accept public testimony regarding this street abandonment request.

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its February 28, 2023 meeting, approved findings that the conditional street vacation conforms to the adopted City General Plan; and WHEREAS, this application is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061 (General/Common Sense Rule) of the State’s Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. Based upon the facts and analysis presented in the staff report, public testimony received and subject to the conditions listed below, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:

1. The proposed vacation of portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys right-of-way shown on Exhibit “B” is consistent with the General Plan for the City of El Paso de Robles because the streets are not identified for future circulation purposes; and

2. The subject portion of street right-of-way described on Exhibit “B” shall be vacated for public purposes; and

Attachment 2

3. The subject portion of street rights-of-way described on Exhibit “B” shall retain a public water, sewer, stormwater, and Public Utility Easement; and

4. The subject portion of street right-of-way described on Exhibit “B” are no longer required for street or highway purposes; and

5. From and after the date this Resolution is recorded, the streets vacated no longer constitute a street or highway.

Section 3. This application is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061 (General/Common Sense Rule) of the State’s Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 4. The Planning Commission recommended approval of Street Abandonment 23-001 approval subject to the following exhibits and conditions:

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
A Conditions
B Street Abandonment Exhibit Map
Approved this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Steven W. Martin, Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Attachment 2
Exhibit A
Conditions of Street Abandonment

1. The City Clerk of the City of El Paso de Robles shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Clerk Recorder, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California.

2. This Street Vacation is Contingent Upon the State of California Approving the Pioneer Park Purchase Acquisition Agreement.

Attachment 2
Exhibit B
Street Abandonment Map

Note: This map is not based
entirely on a field survey, some
lines are calculated from record data.Project File :\\12024Stac.dwgLast Updated : 27 JAN 2023 Exhibit B - Map
Paso Robles Event Center
Legend:

Indicates Streets
to be Vacated
Exhibit
B
and Public Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Public Utility Easements to be retained.

Unnamed Alley
Unnamed Alley

Attachment 3
1000 SPRING STREET  PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446  www.prcity.com

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”

AFFIDAVIT

OF SITE NOTICES FOR STREET VACATIONS
I, Katie Banister , employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, California, do hereby certify that site notices have been posted conspicuously along the line of each street and alley to be vacated as required by California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8320-8325 for the February 28, 2023 Planning Commission hearing and the March 21, 2023 City Council hearing for Street Abandonment 23-01 (P21-0096), on this 9
th day of February 2023.

City of El Paso de Robles
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Signed:

Katie Banister

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Account # Order Number Identification Order PO Amount Cols Depth 18693 381009 Paso Robles Event Center $850.00 3 20.50 in Attention: Vikki Kuntz
City of Paso Robles 893989
1000 SPRING ST.

PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
Copy of ad content
is on the next page
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
2 insertion(s) published on:
02/10/23, 02/17/23
Legals Clerk

STATE OF TEXAS)
SS
County of Dallas)
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned
was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of The Tribune, a newspaper of general Circulation,
printed and published daily at the City of San Luis
Obispo in the above named county and state; that
notice at which the annexed clippings is a true copy, was published in the above-named newspaper and not in
any supplement thereof - on the following dates to wit; From 02/10/2023 To 02/17/2023 that said newspaper was
duly and regularly ascertained and established a
newspaper of general circulation by Decree entered in
the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of
California, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the Gover I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Notary Public in and for the state of Texas, residing in Dallas County
Extra charge for lost or duplicate affidavits.

Legal document please do not destroy!
Attachment 4

Attachment 4

RESOLUTION NO: PC 23-011

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION

OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
FOR STREET ABANDONMENT 23-001
(Portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys)
Gregory’s Subdivision - B/MB/17
2198 RIVERSIDE AVENUE, APN: 008-183-023
WHEREAS, the applicant, the City of Paso Robles, has filed a Street Abandonment application for a summary vacation of portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys (Roads)(P20-0076); and WHEREAS, abandonment of the Roads will enable the expansion of the Paso Robles Event Center; and WHEREAS, the Roads rights-of-way is not shown in the General Plan for future circulation purposes.; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code 8334, the subject right-of-way may be considered for vacation; and
WHEREAS, Section 65402(a) of the Government Code provides that “…no street shall be vacated or abandoned, … if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such… street vacation or abandonment… has been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof”; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds consistent with the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan, that the Roads are excess right-of-ways not required for existing or future street purposes; and
WHEREAS, this application is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061 (General Rule) of the State’s Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on February 28, 2023, to consider the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this project, and to accept public testimony regarding this street abandonment request; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Recitals. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2: Findings. based upon the facts and analysis presented in the staff report, public testimony received and subject to the conditions listed below, the Planning Commission makes the following findings:

1. The proposed vacation of portions of Victoria Place, San Luis Avenue, Frontage Road, Hortense Avenue, Gregory Avenue, and unnamed Alleys right-of-way shown on Exhibit “B” is consistent with the General Plan for the City of El Paso de Robles because the streets are not identified for future circulation purposes; and
Resolution PC 23-011 Attachment 5

2. The subject portion of street right-of-way described on Exhibit "B" be vacated for public purposes; and

3. The subject portion of street rights-of-way described on Exhibit "B" shall retain a public water, sewer, stormwater, and Public Utility Easement; and Section 3: Environmental Detem1in;uion. This application is exempt from environmental review per Section 15061 (General Ruic) of the State's Guidelines to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Seccion 4: Recommendation to City Council.: the Planning Commission recommends approval of Street Abandonment 23-001 approval subject to the following exhibits and conditions:

EXHIBIT PESCRIPT10N
A Conditions
13 Street Abandonment Exhibit Map
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS zgu, Day of February 2023, by the following Roll Call Vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Commissioner Gibson, Covarrubias, Christensen, Davis, Neel and Chairperson Koegler None
Commissioner Jorgensen
None

SECRETARY
Resolution PC 23-011
Attachment 5

Exhibit A
Conditions of Street Abandonment

1. The City Clerk of the City of El Paso de Robles shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Clerk Recorder, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California.

2. This Street Vacation is Contingent Upon the State of California Approving the Pioneer Park Purchase Acquisition Agreement.

Resolution PC 23-011 Attachment 5

Note: This map is not based
entirely on a field survey, some
lines are calculated from record data.Project File :\\12024Stac.dwgLast Updated : 27 JAN 2023 Exhibit B - Map
Paso Robles Event Center
Legend:

Indicates Streets
to be Vacated
Resolution PC 23-011
0 0
I"')
0 I{)
0 21ST ST
80 '
.-:~?N
0 0 8 ···2. 5 4 ··· 0 Of
Nd a ?art
N
Freeway
R/W per
112/LS/100
Attachment 5
and Public Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Public Utility Easements to be retained.

Unnamed Alley
Unnamed Alley

Council Agenda Report
From: Freda Berman, Public Works Director
Subject: Approval of Paso Robles Airport 50th Anniversary Celebration CEQA Determination: The City find that this action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304(e), Minor Alterations of Land, as a temporary use having no permanent effect on the environment
Date: April 4, 2023
Facts

1. The Paso Robles Municipal Airport originated as a Marine Corps Bomber Base and was dedicated as Estrella Army Airfield in 1943. In 1947, the Federal Government transferred the land to the County of San Luis Obispo to be used as a commercial airport. Commercial service continued until 1974.

2. On May 7, 1973, the County sold the Airport to the City of Paso Robles for $1. In 1973, there were four businesses with a total of 22 employees at the Airport. Today more than 40 businesses and over 700 employees make up the Paso Robles Municipal Airport community.

3. An event spotlighting the Airport was first held in 1992 and staged periodically since. To celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Paso Robles Municipal Airport, the Airport Commission proposes to invite the public to the airport grounds on Saturday, September 23, 2023, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. to showcase the rich history, current activities and future plans for the Airport.

4. The free admission event will feature the arrival of military aircraft, a parachute drop, and static displays including historical aircraft, Cal Poly aeronautics, and information on the Spaceport and Technology Corridor. Other informational booths will include local law enforcement, military recruiters, local flight schools and pilot organizations. A remote-control demonstration is planned as are ticketed bi-plane, helicopter and C-47 rides.

5. The public is encouraged to celebrate the 50th Anniversary with a free cupcake – 2,000 will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Food trucks will also be on site.

6. City staff will supplement the staffing for this volunteer-run event. The Airport Commission, led by Commissioner Tony Gaspar, will spearhead operations along with volunteers from the Boy Scouts, Grizzly Academy and youth sports groups.

7. The 50th Anniversary Celebration is estimated to cost $26,000, including City staff overtime.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Authorize the staging of the Paso Robles Airport 50th Anniversary Celebration at the Paso Robles Municipal Airport on Saturday, September 23, 2023, or;

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
The Paso Robles Municipal Airport is a linchpin in the future vision of the northeast area of the City beginning with current efforts to secure a Spaceport license as part of the spaceport and technology corridor initiative. Increasing public awareness of the history and potential of the Airport can only assist in creating the energy and enthusiasm to make the vision a reality.

The Airport Commission has put together a complete plan to educate and entertain event attendees.

Promotions are planned to attract up to 3,000 attendees to the Airport for the Celebration. City staff will assist as necessary to ensure a safe, well-coordinated event.

Fiscal Impact
The estimated total event cost including labor, materials, and equipment is $26,000. If approved, appropriations will be included in the FY 2023-24 budget update and split between Airport Fund Reserves and General Fund Reserves.

CEQA Determination
The event is exempt from CEQA under Section 15304(e) of the CEQA Guidelines, as a minor temporary use having negligible or no permanent effects on the environment. If Council approves the recommended action, the Paso Robles Municipal Airport would process the Airport’s Special Event Permit, that includes standard waivers and procedures.

Recommendation
Authorize the staging of the Paso Robles Airport 50th Anniversary Celebration at the Paso Robles Municipal Airport on Saturday, September 23, 2023, at an estimated total cost of $26,000, split between Airport Fund Reserves and General Fund Reserves.

Attachments
None.

Council Agenda Report
From: Angelica Fortin, Community Services Department Director Subject: Encampment Resolution Funding Grant Application CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378(b)(4).

Date: April 4, 2023
Facts

1. City Council Adopted Goals and Strategic Priorities includes Housing and Homelessness as one of six goal areas of prioritization during the FY 22-23 and 23-24 budget cycle. Enhancing emergency sheltering services and reducing the number of unsheltered individuals using collaborative strategies were included as objectives to addressing the goal area.

2. On August 9, 2022, the San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors approved a 5-Year Countywide Plan to Address Homelessness with the goal of decreasing homelessness in the region by 50 percent.

3. In January of 2023, the County of San Luis Obispo Homeless Services Division requested the City’s collaboration and support in applying for the Second Round of the Encampment Resolution Funding Program (ERF-2-R) provided through the California Interagency Council on Homelessness.

4. Up to $237,301,738 are available for award through the ERF-2-R program on a rolling basis until June 30, 2023, or until funds are exhausted, for the purpose of resolving critical encampment concerns. Funding can only be used for programs that connect people experiencing homelessness in encampments to interim shelter with clear pathways to permanent housing.

5. The Salinas Riverbed encampments within the City of Paso Robles have been identified as prioritized encampments due to ongoing safety concerns and the County is seeking to apply for ERF-2-R funding to establish a temporary supportive housing campus modeled after the 5 Cities Homeless Coalition’s Grover Beach Cabins-for-Change program in Paso Robles to provide directed services to riverbed encampment populations.

6. The County is proposing to be the lead agency in writing, submitting, and administering the ERF-2- R grant application and is requesting that the City assist with development of the program, identification and provision of a suitable location for the campus, and securing of local permits for site development.

7. The County intends to apply for $6.5 million to fund the project through June of 2026 and will seek additional funding to maintain operations through December of 2026.

Options

1. Take no action;

2. Authorize the City Manager to provide a letter of support for the submittal of the ERF-2-R grant to the County of San Luis Obispo and direct staff to return to City Council with a plan for implementation if the grant is approved.

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
In 2022, the City of Paso Robles and the County of San Luis Obispo prioritized services to the unhoused through the collection of community feedback, goal setting, and strategic planning. In particular, the community, Emergency Services, and Police have identified the Salinas Riverbed encampments as a critical

safety concern. Safety issues in the riverbed include continuous fire activity due to cooking and warming fires, sanitation issues that compromise the security of one of our region’s major water sources, and the threat to life due to severe flooding during heavy rain. The County has identified the ERF-2-R funding program as an opportunity to address concerns caused by the Salinas Riverbed encampments and has requested City support in moving forward with a grant application.

ERF-2-R funding is intended to resolve critical encampment concerns and to transition unhoused individuals into safe and stable housing. Awards will be prioritized for applications that demonstrate collaboration while protecting the health and well-being of individuals living in encampments. The first round of funding featured one disbursement totaling $48 million to 19 jurisdictions. The second round, now open for applications, features up to $237,301,738 million that are available on a rolling basis through June 30, 2023, or until funds are exhausted, whichever is sooner.

With support from the City of Paso Robles, the County proposes to apply for ERF-2-R funding for the purpose of operating a temporary supportive housing campus in the City of Paso Robles to directly serve the Salinas Riverbed encampment population. This campus would be modeled after the federally funded 5 Cities Homeless Coalition’s Cabins for Change program, that opened in December of 2022 in Grover Beach. The 90-day temporary supportive housing model operates a closed campus 24-hours a day and features 20 supportive housing units, communal restrooms and bathing facilities, a shared dining hall, a dog wash, assigned storage space, a staff-operations building and two case worker offices. The units are just over 100 sq ft in size and come equipped with heating and air conditioning (Pallet Shelter). To move forward with this model, a temporary County ordinance was approved to establish minimum safety standards for any subject emergency housing facility located on County owned or leased public facilities. Located on County property, the campus is adjacent to the County Public Health Clinic and Drug and Alcohol Services.

A successful grant in Paso Robles will allow the County to work with City staff to customize a similar County administered model within City limits on City-owned property. The grant will fund a dedicated Paso Robles Salinas Riverbed Encampment Project Manager for the duration of the grant period and a dedicated service provider to manage riverbed outreach and onsite operations. On-site wrap around services will be prioritized as well as a closed campus location that is within walking distance to additional critical services. In consideration of the extreme temperatures in Paso Robles, an alternative housing structure with a higher insulation rating, such as LIFEARK or BOSS Cubez will also be considered. A full de-mobilization plan will be built into the grant application to ensure the selected site is restored if the program is unsuccessful.

City staff has identified the underutilized site at 624 Pine Street (South Train Station Parking Lot) as a highly suitable location. The paved location can be quickly modified to accommodate 15-20 units with a private and unobtrusive sightline. The city-owned property is within walking distance of transportation, City services and County Behavioral, Public Health and Social Services.

Fiscal Impact
The County will write and submit the ERF-2-R grant application. There is no fiscal impact associated with providing a letter of support. The County intends to apply for $6.5 million to fund the project through June of 2026 and will seek additional funding to maintain operations through December of 2026. If the grant is awarded, staff will return to City Council with a full operational plan that will include details regarding services and options for designation of City owned property and development fees. City funds will not be expended for capital or operating costs.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378. If a grant is awarded CEQA will be analyzed at that time. Currently there are insufficient facts to complete an analysis.

Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to provide a letter of support for the submittal of the ERF-2-R grant to the County of San Luis Obispo and direct staff to return to City Council with a plan for implementation if the grant is approved.

Attachments

1. Encampment Resolution Funding Grant Presentation

Encampment Resolution
Funding
Interim Supportive Housing
Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Encampment
Resolution
Funding (ERF)
$237 million competitive grant
program available to assist local
jurisdictions in ensuring the
wellness and safety of people
experiencing homelessness in
encampments by providing
services and supports that
address their immediate physical
and mental wellness and result in
meaningful paths to safe and
stable housing.

Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency
Attachment 1

ERF Specifics

APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED ON A
ROLLING BASES UNTIL JUNE 30,
2023

CONNECT PEOPLE EXPERIENCING

HOMELESSNESS IN

ENCAMPMENTS TO INTERIM

SHELTER WITH CLEAR PATHWAYS

TO PERMANENT HOUSING OR TO

PLACE PEOPLE DIRECTLY INTO

PERMANENT HOUSING
FUNDS OBLIGATED BY 6/30/2024
AND EXPENDED BY 6/30/2026
Attachment 1

Prioritized
Encampments:

Salinas
Riverbed
Attachment 1

County Proposal
• County led application
• County to administer, report, and
monitor the grant
• Use funds to:
• Hire a local project coordinator
• Establish a campus modeled after
the 5 Cities Cabins for Change
Program
• Establish new service provider to
manage the program with
targeted outreach and wrap
around services
• Fund operations through 2026
Attachment 1

Local Support

PROGRAM

DEVELOPMENT

SITE IDENTIFICATION

AND PROVISION
PERMIT

COORDINATION
Attachment 1

Grover Beach Model: Cabins
for Change
Attachment 1

Paso Team
Attachment 1

Background
• No shelter spaces in South
County
• Funded through CARES ACT and
American Rescue Plan
• Built on County property in
Grover Beach
Attachment 1

Services
• 90 Day consistent housing
• No walk ups
• Adjacent County services
• Outreach team
• Wi-fi and computer access
• Opportunities to assist with
campus maintenance
Attachment 1

Campus
• 20 Single occupancy cabins
• 2 ADA
• Partners and pets ok
• No families
Attachment 1

Cabin Specs
• 102 sq ft.
• September 21, 2021: Temporary
County ordinance approved by
the SLO County Board of
Supervisors to establish
minimum safety standards for
any subject emergency housing
facility located on County owned
or leased public facilities.

Attachment 1

Campus
• 1 Communal dining facility
Attachment 1

Campus
• 5 Showers with toilets/ 1 single
toilet
• 70 sq. ft.
• 1 shower/restroom per 15
guests
Attachment 1

Campus
• Exterior storage for each unit
Attachment 1

Campus
• 1 Dog wash station
Attachment 1

Campus
• 2 Case management offices
• Case management ratio of 1/10
Attachment 1

Campus
• 1 Staff operations building
Attachment 1

Safety
• Amnesty box for drugs and
weapons
• Cameras throughout with PD
access
• Alarmed pedestrian gates
• Cabins numbered on roof/door
for Emergency Services
• Staff site monitors on site (not
security guards)
• 9 pm curfew/ 10 pm quiet time
Attachment 1

Staff
• 15 total
• 2-3 staff per shift
Attachment 1

Budget
• Estimated annual operating
budget=$1 million per year
Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Potential
Location
Attachment 1

Train Station Site
•15,000± sq ft.

Attachment 1

BOSS Cubez
Attachment 1

LIFEARK
PATENTED DESIGN • First of its kind, fully approved mass-produced housing in the world to
use plastic polymer in
compliance with
international and
California building codes.
• Kit-o
f-parts with Lego-
like simplicity allows
easy assembly and
transport
• Raised floor with 22” clear crawl space allows
for all utilities to run
under the building above
the ground to minimize
sitework costs
• Fully independent
modular system allows
for easy disassembly for
cost effective relocation
and reuse

NEW CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL • HDPE with PU foam
insulation allows for
high structural strength,
buoyancy, R-40 thermal
resistance and high
acoustic value
• First of its kind to use plastic as a load bearing
material in construction
allowing design to be
used in high wind and
high seismic areas
• Code compliant Class-A
fire rating allows lifeark
to be used in the most
extreme fire prone
areas
• Certified raw plastic
material allow use of up
to 30% of post
consumer recycled
plastic as a main
building material to
help clean plastic trash
from ocean and landfills
Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Attachment 1

Fiscal Impact
The County intends to apply
for $6.5 million to fund the
project through June of 2026
The County will seek
additional funding to
maintain operations through
December of 2026
There is no fiscal impact for providing a letter of support.

Attachment 1

Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to provide a letter of support for the submittal of the ERF-2-R grant to the County of San Luis Obispo and direct staff to return to City Council with a plan for implementation if the grant is approved.

Attachment 1