Agenda packet — Paso Robles City Council, February 20, 2024 (part 2 of 3)

Please Note: The APCD recently updated the Land Use and CEQA Webpage on the slocleanair.org website.

The information on the webpage displays the most up-to-date guidance from the SLO County APCD, including the 2023 CEQA GHG Guidance & Threshold Recommendations, Quick Guide for Construction Mitigation Measures and Quick Guide for Operational Mitigation Measures. (1) General Comments
Nuisance Odors from Wineries
Wine production facilities can generate nuisance odors during various steps of the process. Proven methods for handling wastewater discharge and grape skin waste need to be incorporated into the winery practices to reduce off-site odor. Odor complaints could result in a violation of the SLO County APCD Rule 402, Nuisance.

Construction Permit Requirements
Based on the information provided, we are unsure of the types of equipment that may be present during the project’s construction phase. Portable equipment, 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, used during construction activities may require a California statewide portable equipment registration (issued by the California Air Resources Board) or an APCD permit. The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements but should not be viewed as exclusive:
• Power screens, conveyors, diesel engines, and/or crushers; • Portable generators and equipment with engines that are 50 hp or greater; • Electrical generation plants or the use of standby generators; • Internal combustion engines; and
• Tub grinders
For a more detailed listing, refer to the Technical Appendices, page 4-4, in the APCD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook.

Operational Permit Requirements
Based on the information provided, we are unsure of the types of equipment that may be present at the site. Operational sources may require APCD permits. The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements but should not be viewed as exclusive:
• New wineries or expanding wineries with the capacity of 26,000 gallons (10,000 cases at twelve 750 milliliter bottles per case) year or more require a Permit to Operate for fermentation and storage of wine;
• Portable generators and equipment with engines that are 50 hp or greater; • Any stationary or portable agricultural engine over 50 hp; • Electrical generation plants or the use of standby generators; • Food and beverage preparation (primarily coffee roasters); • Furniture and fixture products;
• Metal industries, fabrication;
• Small scale manufacturing;
• Boilers;
• Internal combustion engines; and
• Sterilization units using ethylene oxide and incinerators.

Attachment 4

Page 145 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
APCD Comments Regarding MND for the Proposed Paso Robles Covelop Project October 9, 2023

Page 3 of 6 ends

For a more detailed listing, refer to the Technical Appendix, page 4-4, in the APCD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. For information on how to apply for an APCD Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate, click here. Note: Most facilities applying for an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate with stationary diesel engines greater than 50 hp, should be prioritized or screened for facility wide health risk impacts. A diesel engine-only facility limited to 20 non-emergency operating hours per year or has demonstrated to have overall diesel particulate emissions less than or equal to 2 lb/yr does not need to complete an additional health risk assessment.

(2) Air Quality

CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Construction Phase Impacts - Exceeds Threshold(s)
The APCD evaluated the construction impacts of this project using the most recent CalEEMod computer model and the inputs the applicant used. The modeling results indicate that the construction phase impacts will likely exceed the APCD’s significance threshold values identified in Table 2-1 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. However, APCD was able to model ROG plus NOx emissions below the APCD Quarterly Tier 2 threshold of 6.3 tons of ozone precursors/quarter.

APCD’s results were close to the applicants modeling results when a “Use Low VOC paint” mitigation measure was included.

Therefore, APCD recommends that the City of Paso Robles add a mitigation measure that the project’s construction phase will either use low VOC paints (50 g of VOC per liter or lower) or source prefabricated/painted project materials to ensure the project is beneath the APCD’s ozone precursor quarterly threshold.

Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Equipment This project exceeds the following threshold; therefore the project’s construction phase shall implement Standard Construction Mitigation Measures:
• Exceeds ROG+NOx Quarterly Tier 1 threshold
Standard Mitigation Measures include, but are not limited to:
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications;
• Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with CARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road); • Use diesel construction equipment meeting CARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner offroad heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State Off-Road Regulation; • Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the CARB’s 2010 or cleaner certification standard for on-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On-Road Regulation; • Construction or trucking companies with fleets that that do not have engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets) may be eligible by proving alternative compliance; • All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5-minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit;
• Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted; Attachment 4

Page 146 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
APCD Comments Regarding MND for the Proposed Paso Robles Covelop Project October 9, 2023

Page 4 of 6 ends

• Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors; • Electrify equipment when feasible;
• Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and, • Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane or biodiesel.

Fugitive Dust Mitigation Measures: Expanded List
Construction activities can generate fugitive dust, which could be a nuisance to residents and businesses in close proximity to the proposed construction site. Projects with grading areas more than 4 acres and/or within 1,000 feet of any sensitive receptor shall implement the following mitigation measures to manage fugitive dust emissions such that they do not exceed the APCD 20% opacity limit (APCD Rule 401) and minimize nuisance (APCD Rule 402) impacts:
a. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible; b. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding the APCD’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. When drought conditions exist and water use is a concern, the contractor or builder should consider use of a dust suppressant that is effective for the specific site conditions to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. Please refer to the following link from the San Joaquin Valley Air District for a list of potential dust suppressants: Products Available for Controlling Dust;
c. All stockpiled dirt should be sprayed daily and covered with tarps or other dust barriers as needed;
d. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible, and building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding, soil binders or other dust controls are used;
e. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) or otherwise comply with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 23114; f. “Track-Out” is defined as sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304. To prevent ‘track out’, designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them. Install and operate a ‘track-out prevention device’ where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out prevention device’ can be any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing track out, located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road. Rumble strips or steel plate devices need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the track-out prevention device may need to be modified; g. All fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on grading and building plans; h. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons whose responsibility is to ensure any fugitive dust emissions do not result in a nuisance and to enhance the implementation of the mitigation measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints and reduce visible emissions below the APCD’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress (for example, wind-blown dust could be generated on an open dirt Attachment 4

Page 147 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
APCD Comments Regarding MND for the Proposed Paso Robles Covelop Project October 9, 2023

Page 5 of 6 ends

lot). The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition (Contact the Compliance Division at 805-781-5912).
i. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible, following completion of any soil disturbing activities;
j. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established;
k. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD; l. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site;
m. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers shall be used with reclaimed water where feasible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when feasible; and
n. Take additional measures as needed to ensure dust from the project site is not impacting areas outside the project boundary.

OPERATIONAL PHASE
Operational Phase Impacts - Below Threshold
Based on the APCD’s operational phase emission estimates using the most recent CalEEMod computer model, the operational phase would likely be less than the APCD’s significance threshold values identified in Table 3-2 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook.

(3) Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The project proponent evaluated the greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts of this project using the most recent CalEEMod computer model with the results included in Table L of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The applicant incorrectly amortized the Operation emissions of 1,875 MT carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)/year, instead of the overall construction emissions of 1,124 MT CO2e over the four years of construction. Commercial projects use a 25-year project life for amortized construction emissions resulting in 45 MT CO2e/yr to be added to the operational phase emissions.

The applicant removed unnecessary refrigerant emissions (736 MT CO2e/yr) from the total operational emissions (1,875 MT CO2e/yr ) for a total of 1,139 MT CO2e/yr. APCD added the applicant’s Operational emissions to the amortized Construction phase emissions resulting in 1,184 MT CO2e/yr.

The 1,184 MT CO2e per year exceeds the potential interim GHG threshold of 690 metric tons of CO2e emissions per year the city may find to be applicable for this project. However, when APCD re-ran CalEEmod using Central Coast Community Energy as the energy supplier, the result was 720 MT CO2e. Using the following mitigation measures, the project proponent could achieve a reduction in greenhouse gas reductions below 690 metric tons of CO2e per year:

Attachment 4

Page 148 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
APCD Comments Regarding MND for the Proposed Paso Robles Covelop Project October 9, 2023

Page 6 of 6 ends

• The applicant commit to the project receiving power from Central Coast Community Energy;
• Construct the project with adequate electrical panel capacity to support an all-electric retrofit of the development; and
• Construct project to improve on CALGreen electric vehicle (EV) capable standards by making parking spaces EV ready instead, thus supporting the transition to electric transportation.

Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at 805-781-5912.

Sincerely,

ASHLEY GOLDLIST
Air Quality Specialist
ASG/kaw
cc: Damien Mavis, 3090 Anderson LLC dba Tooth & Nail Winery ([email protected]) Dora Drexler, APCD,([email protected])
Darcy Delgado, The City of Paso Robles, ([email protected]) Ian McCarville, Kirk Consulting,([email protected]) Attachment 4

Page 149 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Via Email
October 10, 2023
Joel Neel, Chairperson
Ty Christensen, Chairperson Pro-Temp
Patrick Connally
Robert Covarrubias
Sheree Davis
Mark Koegler
Eric Marlow
Planning Commission
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, California 93446
[email protected]
Darren Nash
City Planner
Community Development Department
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, California 93446
[email protected]
Re: Comment on Mitigated Negative Declaration for CoVelop Industrial Project (SCH No. 2023090132, Planned Development 22-20, Oak Tree Removal 23-11, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR22-0054, and CUP 23- 14) and Planning Commission Agenda Item 1 (Tues., October 10, 2023) Dear Chair Neel, Honorable Planning Commissioners of Paso Robles, and Mr. Nash:

This comment is submitted on behalf of Supporters Alliance For Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) prepared for the CoVelop Industrial Project (SCH 2023090132), which proposes the development of six commercial/light industrial buildings totaling 240,327 square feet and removal of six oak trees at 2930 Union Road (APN: 025-362-043) in the City of Paso Robles (“Project”).

SAFER is concerned that the MND is improper under the California Environmental Quality Act because there is a fair argument that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts that must be analyzed and mitigated in an environmental impact report (“EIR). The construction of the project necessitates removal of six ecologically-important native valley oaks and eliminates potential habitat for the protected San Joaquin Kit Fox, a species currently endangered primarily due to habitat loss as a result of land conversion and development. SAFER requests that an environmental impact report be prepared for the Project rather than an MND to ensure that potentially significant impacts of this Project are fully disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated.

Attachment 5

Page 150 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
October 10, 2023
Comment on Mitigated Negative Declaration for CoVelop Industrial Project (SCH No. 2023090132, Planned Development 22-20, Oak Tree Removal 23-11, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR22-0054, and CUP 23-14) and Planning Commission Agenda Item 1 (Tues., October 10, 2023)

Page 2 of 2 ends

SAFER reserves the right to supplement this comment throughout the administrative process. Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist., 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121 (1997).

Sincerely,
Richard Drury
Lozeau Drury LLP
Attachment 4

Page 151 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 6

Page 152 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 6

Page 153 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 6

Page 154 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 6

Page 155 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
January 31, 2024

VIA EMAIL
Darren Nash, City Planner
Community Development Department
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, California 93446
[email protected]
Melissa Boyer, City Clerk
Community Development Department
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, California 93446
[email protected]
Warren Frace, Director
Community Development Department
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, California 93446
[email protected]
Re: Withdrawal of Comments on the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Ardmore Industrial Project - Approval of Development Plan (PD22-20), Oak Tree Removal (OTR23-11), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (PR22-0054), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP23-14) at 2930 Union Road/APN: 025-362-043
Dear Mr. Nash, Mr. Frace, and Ms. Boyer,
This letter is submitted on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) regarding SAFER’s October 10, November 7, and December 12, 2023 comments on the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Ardmore Industrial Project, and the City of Paso Robles’s Approval of Development Plan (PD22-20), Oak Tree Removal (OTR23-11), Vesting Tentative Parcel Map (PR22-0054), and Conditional Use Permit (CUP23-14), for the Ardmore Industrial Project (“Project”), proposed by Covelop, Inc. (“Developer”).

SAFER is pleased to announce that they have reached an agreement with the Developer to resolve the issues raised in their comments on the Project. Pursuant to the agreement, the Developer has agreed to implement additional measures to further protect the environment. SAFER therefore withdraws all comments filed with the City and urges the City to approve the Project.

Attachment 7

Page 156 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
January 31, 2024
Withdrawal of Comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration Ardmore Industrial Project

Page 2 of 2 ends

Sincerely,
Marjan Abubo
LOZEAU | DRURY LLP
CC:

Beth A. Collins ([email protected])
Damien Mavis ([email protected])
Michael Stoltey ([email protected])
Attachment 7

Page 157 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 8
RESOLUTION 24-XXX (A)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (SCH #2023090132) AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PLAN PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FOR A PROJECT CONSISTING OF: COVELOP/MD3 - (PLANNED DEVELOMENT 22-20, OAK TREE REMOVAL 23-11, VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP PR 22-0054, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 23-14) - 2930 UNION ROAD, APN: 025-362-043 WHEREAS, the City of Paso Robles has received applications from Kirk Consulting on behalf of Covelop/MD3, requesting a commercial subdivision, development plan, conditional use permit, and oak tree removal permit to develop an approximate 14-acre site with six (6) commercial/light industrial buildings totaling 240,327± square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Project will require the following entitlements: Planned Development PD 22-20, Oak Tree Removal 23-11 for six (6) native oak trees, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR 22-0054, and Conditional Use Permit 23-14; and WHEREAS, the site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial Service (CS) and is in the Commercial Light-Industrial zoning district, Planned Development zoning overlay (C3-PD); and WHEREAS, commercial and light-industrial uses, included warehousing, are allowed usesin the C3-PD zoning district; and
WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR 22-0054 would subdivide Parcel 6, which is currently 6.76 (net) acres, into two parcels where Parcel A would be 4.03 acres and Parcel B would be 2.73 acres. Existing Lot 13 is approximately 7 acres and while included as part of the development plan, is not included in the subdivision; and WHEREAS, the purpose and intent of the planned development (PD) district zoning overlay is to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of residential, commercial, and industrial developments. Approval of a development plan is required for all development in the planned development (overlay) district; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Statutes and Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq., and the City’s Procedures for Implementing CEQA, an Initial Study and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) SCH 2023090132 were prepared and were circulated for a 30-day public review period beginning on September 11, 2023 and ending October 10, 2023. This process was noticed by: (1) filing a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) with the State Clearinghouse; (2) filing an NOI with the San Luis Obispo County Clerk; (3) placing an NOI in the Tribune Newspaper, a newspaper of general circulation; (4) mailing the NOI to various interested persons, agencies, and tribes; and (5) posting the NOI on the City website; and
WHEREAS, the MND was made available during the public review period at the Paso Robles Community Development Department and on the City’s web page; and
WHEREAS, mitigation measures have been incorporated into the MND and will be imposed on the project through the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(d). These mitigation measures are imposed on the project to address potential environmental effects to:

Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, and Tribal Cultural Resources. With the implementation of this mitigation, all potential environmental effects will be reduced to a less than significant level. These mitigation measures are provided in the exhibits of this resolution; and
WHEREAS, mitigation measures set forth in the MMRP are specific and enforceable. The MMRP adequately describes implementation procedures, monitoring responsibility, reporting actions, compliance schedule, and verification of compliance in order to ensure that the Project complies with the adopted mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, the mitigation measures contained in the MMRP will also be imposed as enforceable conditions of

Page 158 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 8
approval; and
WHEREAS, two written comments were received before the Planning Commission hearing and were initially considered and responded to at the hearing. These comments are summarized as follows:

A. Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Letter (Attachment 4) – suggesting some additional thresholds to consider and associated dust control conditions and greenhouse gas emission conditions.

B. Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) Letter (Attachment 5) – indicating that SAFER is concerned that the proposed MND does not analyze the project impacts related to proposed oak removals and San Joaquin Kit Fox habitat impacts, and requests that an EIR be prepared for the project.

A more thorough response to these comments letters has been prepared and is attached hereto as Exhibit A of this resolution; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2023 to consider the Final MND and the MMRP prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony and written comments on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and Conditional Use Permit; at the close of this public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended, on a 5-0 vote (two Commissioners were absent), that the City Council adopt the MND, the MMRP, and the proposed Project with the addition of conditions of approval to address the APCD letter; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the Final MND is included in Exhibit A of this resolution; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the City Council on November 7, 2023, to consider the Final MND and MMRP prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2023 just prior to the start of the City Council meeting information was provided by Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of SAFER, indicting concerns with the project MND; and WHEREAS, on 5-0 vote the City Council unanimously continued the item to the December 5, 2023, City Council agenda to allow staff and the applicant time to review the information provided from SAFER; and WHEREAS on December 5, 2023, the City Council continued the item to a date uncertain; and WHEREAS, on January 31, 2023, the City Clerk received a letter from Lozeau Drury, LLP, withdrawing the previous comments on the MND for the project, indicating that SAFER and the applicants have reached an agreement resolving the issues raised in their comments on the project.

WHEREAS, the project was duly noticed for the February 20, 2024 City Council Agenda; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the City Council on February 20, 2024, to consider the Final MND and MMRP prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, based on the information and analysis contained in the Final MND prepared for this Project and testimony received as a result of the public notice, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council find there is no substantial evidence supporting a fair argument that there would be a significant impact on the environment, with the mitigation measures imposed on the Project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA, the City Council has independently reviewed the Final MND, and all comments received regarding the Final MND, and neither additional information submitted to the City nor other circumstances have produced substantial new information requiring substantial revisions that would trigger recirculation of the Final MND or additional environmental review of the Project under State CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5. Based on the whole record before it, the City Council finds that the Final MND was prepared in

Page 159 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 8
compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation, and the Final MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Final MND and administrative record for the Project, including all oral and written comments received during the comment period. Based on the City’s independent review and analysis, the City Council finds that the Final MND and the administrative record contain a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project, and that the Final MND has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines.

Section 3. Based on the Final MND and the administrative record, including all public comments (written and oral evidence) presented to the City Council as of February 20, 2024, the City Councilfinds that all environmental impacts of the Project are less than significant with the mitigation set forth in the MND and the MMRP. The City Council further finds that there is no substantial evidence in the administrative record supporting a fair argument that the Project may result in significant environmental impacts. The City Council finds that the Final MND contains a complete, objective, and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project and reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City. No new significant environmental effects have been identified in the Final MND and any changes to the Final MND in response to comments or otherwise do not constitute substantial revisions requiring recirculation under State CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5. Based on these findings, the City Council approves and adoptsthe Final MND for this Project, which is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “B”, pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080, subdivision (c)(2).

Section 4. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the MMRP for the Project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code section 21081.6 and finds that such Plan is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during Project implementation. The City Council therefore approves and adopts the MMRP for the Project, which is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “C” and made a condition of Project approval.

Section 5. The City Council directsstaff to file a Notice of Determination with the San Luis Obispo County Clerk and the Office of Planning and Research within five (5) working days of approval of the Project.

Section 6. The custodian of records for the Final MND, MMRP, and all other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the Paso Robles Community Development Department, located at 1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, California 93446. The custodian of these documents is the City Clerk of the City of Paso Robles.

APPROVED this 20th day of February 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Page 160 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 8
Exhibit A - Response to Comments
Exhibit B – Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration SCH 2023090132 Exhibit C – Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan

Page 161 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Response to Comments
APCD letter dated 10/9/23

1. General Comments
a. Nuisance Odors from Wineries Wine production facilities can generate nuisance odors during various steps of the process. Proven methods for handling wastewater discharge and grape skin waste need to be incorporated into the winery practices to reduce offsite odor. Odor complaints could result in a violation of the SLO County APCD Rule 402, Nuisance.

Response: There is no wine production component for this project. It is anticipated that there would be wine storage, which has no odor.
b. Construction Permit Requirements
Response: The list of equipment is provided for in the project conditions of approval indicating that if used will require an APCD permit.
c. Construction Permit Requirements: Based on the information provided, we are unsure of the types of equipment that may be present during the project’s construction phase.

Portable equipment, 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, used during construction activities may require a California statewide portable equipment registration (issued by the California Air Resources Board) or an APCD permit. The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements but should not be viewed as exclusive:
• Power screens, conveyors, diesel engines, and/or crushers; • Portable generators and equipment with engines that are 50 hp or greater; • Electrical generation plants or the use of standby generators; • Internal combustion engines; and
• Tub grinders.

Response: Condition of approval APCD-1 has been included in Exhibit A of Resolution B. d. Operational Permit Requirements: Based on the information provided, we are unsure of the types of equipment that may be present at the site. Operational sources may require APCD permits. The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements but should not be viewed as exclusive:
• New wineries or expanding wineries with the capacity of 26,000 gallons (10,000 cases at twelve 750 milliliter bottles per case) year or more require a Permit to Operate for fermentation and storage of wine;
• Portable generators and equipment with engines that are 50 hp or greater; • Any stationary or portable agricultural engine over 50 hp • Electrical generation plants or the use of standby generators; • Food and beverage preparation (primarily coffee roasters); • Furniture and fixture products;
• Metal industries, fabrication;
• Small scale manufacturing;
• Boilers; Page 162 of 356
City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
• Internal combustion engines; and
• Sterilization units using ethylene oxide and incinerators.

Response: Condition of approval APCD-2 has been included in Exhibit A of Resolution B.

2. Air Quality
a. The APCD evaluated the construction impacts of this project using the most recent CalEEMod computer model and the inputs the applicant used. The modeling results indicate that the construction phase impacts will likely exceed the APCD’s significance threshold values identified in Table 2-1 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook. However, APCD was able to model ROG plus NOx emissions below the APCD Quarterly Tier 2 threshold of 6.3 tons of ozone precursors/quarter. APCD’s results were close to the applicants’ modeling results when a “Use Low VOC paint” mitigation measure was included.

Response: T he project’s construction phase shell either use low VOC paints (50 g of VOC per liter or lower) or source prefabricated/painted project materials to ensure the project is beneath the APCD’s ozone precursor quarterly threshold. The condition of approval has been added to Exhibit A of Resolution B. b. Standard Mitigation Measures for Construction Equipment This project exceeds ROG+NOx Quarterly Tier 1 threshold; therefore the project’s construction phase shall implement Standard Construction Mitigation Measures:
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications;
• Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with CARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road); • Use diesel construction equipment meeting CARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner off-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State Off-Road Regulation;
• Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the CARB’s 2010 or cleaner certification standard for on-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State OnRoad Regulation; • Construction or trucking companies with fleets that that do not have engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets) may be eligible by proving alternative compliance;
• All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5-minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit;
• Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted; • Staging and queuing areas shall not be located within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors;
• Electrify equipment when feasible;
• Substitute gasoline-powered in place of diesel-powered equipment, where feasible; and,
• Use alternatively fueled construction equipment on-site, such as compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), propane or biodiesel.

Response: The standard conditions listed above have been added as conditions of approval in Exhibit A of Resolution B. Page 163 of 356
City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A

3. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The project proponent evaluated the greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts of this project using the most recent CalEEMod computer model with the results included in Table L of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The applicant incorrectly amortized the Operation emissions of 1,875 MT carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e)/year, instead of the overall construction emissions of 1,124 MT CO2e over the four years of construction. Commercial projects use a 25-year project life for amortized construction emissions resulting in 45 MT CO2e/yr to be added to the operational phase emissions. The applicant removed unnecessary refrigerant emissions (736 MT CO2e/yr) from the total operational emissions (1,875 MT CO2e/yr ) for a total of 1,139 MT CO2e/yr. APCD added the applicant’s Operational emissions to the amortized Construction phase emissions resulting in 1,184 MT CO2e/yr.

Response: The applicant has committed to the project receiving power from Central Coast Community Energy. A condition has been added to Exhibit A of Resolution B.

SAFER – Lozeau Drury Letter

1. Mitigated Negative Declaration Comment
SAFER is concerned that the MND is improper under the California Environmental Quality Act because there is a fair argument that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts that must be analyzed and mitigated in an environmental impact report (“EIR). The construction of the project necessitates removal of six ecologically-important native valley oaks and eliminates potential habitat for the protected San Joaquin Kit Fox, a species currently endangered primarily due to habitat loss as a result of land conversion and development. SAFER requests that an environmental impact report be prepared for the Project rather than an MND to ensure that potentially significant impacts of this Project are fully disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated.

Response:

Oak Removal: The discussion section IV.e. Biological Resources of the Initial Study, adequately addresses tree preservation and removal policies.

San Joaquin Kit Fox habitat removal: Mitigation Measure MM Bio-1 and MM Bio-2 adequately address habitat impacts.

Page 164 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit B

INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION SCH 2023090132
https://pasorobles.escribemeetings.com/PC_Oct10_2023/eSCRIBE%20Documents/eSCRIBE%20Raw%20 Attachments/19/08.%20MND%20-%20Complete.pdf

Page 165 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan
Project File No./Name: Covelop Project – Ardmore Road
Approving Resolution No.: by: Planning Commission City Council Date: September 26, 2023 The following environmental mitigation measures were either incorporated into the approved plans or were incorporated into the conditions of approval. Each and every mitigation measure listed below has been found by the approving body indicated above to lessen the level of environmental impact of the project to a level of non-significance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that it has been completed.

Explanation of Headings:

Type: ............................................................ Project, ongoing, cumulative Monitoring Department or Agency: ........ Department or Agency responsible for monitoring a particular mitigation measure Shown on Plans: .........................................When a mitigation measure is shown on the plans, this column will be initialed and dated.

Verified Implementation: ..........................When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.

Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.

Mitigation Measure
PD 22-20, CUP 22-20, VTPM 22-0054, OTR
(Covelop)
Type
Monitoring
Department
or Agency
Shown on Plans Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
To reduce any potentially significant impact on nesting birds from vegetation removal to a less than significant level, the following mitigation measures are
recommended.

MM BIO-1: Vegetation removal and initial site disturbance shall be conducted between
September 1 and January 31 outside of the nesting season for birds. If vegetation and/or tree removal is planned for the bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31), then preconstruction nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any active nests would be impacted by project construction. If no active nests are found, then no further mitigation shall be required.

OngoingCDD Prior to issuance of
grading permit
Exhibit C

Page 166 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Mitigation Measure
PD 22-20, CUP 22-20, VTPM 22-0054, OTR
(Covelop)
Type
Monitoring
Department
or Agency
Shown on Plans Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
If any active nests are found that would be impacted by construction, then the nest sites shall be avoided with the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around
active nests as determined by a qualified biologist. Nest sites shall be avoided and protected with the nondisturbance buffer zone until the adults and young of the year are no longer reliant on the nest site for survival as determined by a qualified biologist. As such, avoiding
disturbance or take of an active nest would reduce
potential impacts on nesting birds to a less-than-significant level.

MM BIO-2: To avoid direct take of SJKF during construction in accordance with theSFWS and San Luis Obispo County
Guide to SJKF Mitigation Procedures Under CEQA, the
project owner shall adopt the Standard Kit Fox CEQA
Mitigation Measures and shall be included on
development plans. The following measures shall be
implemented:
• A maximum 25 mph speed limit shall be required at
the project site during construction activities.
• All construction activities shall cease at dusk and not start before dawn.
• A qualified biologist shall be on-site immediately prior to initiation of project activities to inspect for any large burrows (e.g., known and potential dens) and to
ensure no wildlife are injured during project activities. If dens are encountered, they should be avoided as
discussed below.
• Exclusion zone boundaries shall be established around all known and potential SJKF dens.

Project CDD Notes shown on
construction
documents.

Prior to issuing Building
Permit.

Exhibit C

Page 167 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Mitigation Measure
PD 22-20, CUP 22-20, VTPM 22-0054, OTR
(Covelop)
Type
Monitoring
Department
or Agency
Shown on Plans Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
• All excavations deeper than 2 feet shall be completely covered at the end of each working day, or fitted with
wildlife escape ramps.
• All pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be
inspected for SJKF and other wildlife before burying,
capping, or moving.
• All exposed openings of pipes, culverts, or similar
structures shall be capped or temporarily sealed prior
to the end of each working day.
• All food-related trash shall be removed from the site at the end of each workday.
• Project-related equipment shall be prohibited outside of designated work areas and access routes.
• No firearms shall be allowed in the project area.
• Disturbance to burrows shall be avoided to the
greatest extent feasible.
• No rodenticides or herbicides should be applied in the project area.
• Permanent fences between any remaining habitat
areas shall allow for SJKF passage through or
underneath (i.e., an approximate 4-inch passage gap
shall remain at ground level).
• To avoid take of any SJKF and/or active SJKF dens,
within 30 days prior to the initiation of site disturbance, implement the SJKF den survey and den closure
protocol for unoccupied dens. Any SJKF occupied
dens shall be avoided until the SJKF leave the den/site. • Prior to issuance of grading and/or construction permit and within 30 days prior to initiation of site disturbance and/or construction, all personnel associated with the
project shall attend a worker education training
program, conducted by a qualified biologist, to avoid
or reduce impacts on sensitive biological resources
(i.e. San Joaquin kit fox). At a minimum, as the
Exhibit C

Page 168 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Mitigation Measure
PD 22-20, CUP 22-20, VTPM 22-0054, OTR
(Covelop)
Type
Monitoring
Department
or Agency
Shown on Plans Verified
Implementation Timing/Remarks
program relates to the kit fox, the training shall include the kit fox’s life history, all mitigation measures
specified by the City, as well as any related biological report(s) prepared for the project. The applicant shall notify the City shortly prior to this meeting. A kit fox fact sheet shall also be developed prior to the training
program, and distributed at the training program to all contractors, employers and other personnel involved
with the construction of the project.
• During the site-disturbance and/or construction phase, any contractor or employee that inadvertently kills or
injures a San Joaquin kit fox or who finds any such
animal either dead, injured, or entrapped shall be
required to report the incident immediately to the
applicant and City. In the event that any observations
are made of injured or dead kit fox, the applicant shall immediately notify the USFWS and CDFW by
telephone. In addition, formal notification shall be
provided in writing within three working days of the
finding of any such animal(s). Notification shall include the date, time, location and circumstances of the
incident. Any threatened or endangered species
found dead or injured shall be turned over
immediately to CDFW for care, analysis, or disposition.

MM CUL-1 In the event that cultural resources including human remains are encountered during ground
disturbance activity, the project shall stop all activity within a 100-foot radius of the find and the project archaeologist shall access the situation with the County Coroner to verify the next steps and determine when construction may
resume.

Project CDD Prior to site
disturbance, grading
permit issued
(add additional measures as necessary)
Exhibit C

Page 169 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Explanation of Headings:

Verified Implementation: ..........................When a mitigation measure has been implemented, this column will be initialed and dated.

Remarks: ...................................................... Area for describing status of ongoing mitigation measure, or for other information.

Exhibit C

Page 170 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 9
RESOLUTION 24-XXX (B)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES APPROVING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 22-20, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 23-14, AND OAK TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 23-11
2930 UNION ROAD, APN: 025-362-043
APPLICANT – COVELOP/MD3
WHEREAS, the City of Paso Robles has received applications from Kirk Consulting on behalf of Covelop/MD3, requesting a commercial subdivision, development plan, conditional use permit, and oak tree removal permit, to develop an approximate 14-acre site with six (6) commercial/light industrial buildings totaling 240,327± square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Project will require the following entitlements: Planned Development PD 22-20, Oak Tree Removal 23-11 for six (6) native oak trees, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR 22-0054, and Conditional Use Permit 23-14; and
WHEREAS, the site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial Service (CS) and is in the Commercial Light-Industrial zoning district, Planned Development zoning overlay (C3-PD); and WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR 22-0054 would subdivide Parcel 6, which is currently 6.76 (net) acres, into two parcels where Parcel A would be 4.03 acres and Parcel B would be 2.73 acres. Existing Lot 13 is approximately 7 acres and while included as part of the development plan, is not included in the subdivision; and
WHEREAS, commercial and light-industrial uses, included warehousing, are allowed uses in the C3-PD zoning district, and are not considered detrimental to the City’s efforts to revitalize the downtown; and WHEREAS, this project is located in the geographic area east of Golden Hill Road, south of Union Road and Highway 46 East, and is subject to Zoning Code Section 21.13.030F, to ensure the project is designed in a manner that is compatible with the neighboring land uses, including the residentially zoned property to the south of Lot 13; and
WHEREAS, the purpose and intent of the planned development (PD) district zoning overlay is to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of residential, commercial, and industrial developments. Approval of a development plan is required for all development in the planned development (overlay) district; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Statutes and Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq., and the City’s Procedures for Implementing CEQA, an Initial Study and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) SCH 2023090132 were prepared and circulated for a 30-day public review period beginning on September 11, 2023 and October 10, 2023, and notice thereof was provided by: (1) filing a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) with the State Clearinghouse; (2) filing an NOI with the San Luis Obispo County Clerk; (3) placing an NOI in the Tribune Newspaper, a newspaper of general circulation; (4) mailing the NOI to various interested persons, agencies, and tribes; and (5) posting the NOI on the City website; and

Page 171 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 9
WHEREAS, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the design of the project at their meeting on July 31, 2023, where they were in favor of the project and recommended that the project be scheduled before the Planning Commission for review. The DRC requested more detailed information related to internal pedestrian connectivity, truck turning movements, and additional perspective views of buildings would be helpful for the Planning Commission to review; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2023 to consider the Final MND prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony and written comments on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit, and environmental determination. At the close of this public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended, on a 5-0 vote (two Commissioners were absent), that the City Council adopt the MND and the proposed Project with the addition of conditions of approval to address the APCD letter; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the City Council on November 7, 2023 to consider the Final MND prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit, and environmental determination; and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 2023 just prior to the start of the City Council meeting information was provided by Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of SAFER, indicting concerns with the project MND; and WHEREAS, on 5-0 vote the City Council unanimously continued the item to the December 5, 2023, City Council agenda to allow staff and the applicant time to review the information provided from SAFER; and WHEREAS on December 5, 2023, the City Council continued the item to a date uncertain; and WHEREAS, on January 31, 2023, the City Clerk received a letter from Lozeau Drury, LLP, withdrawing the previous comments on the MND for the project, indicating that SAFER and the applicants have reached an agreement resolving the issues raised in their comments on the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Recitals. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2: Findings. Based upon the facts and analysis presented in the staff report, public testimony received, and subject to the conditions listed below, the City Council makes the following findings:

Page 172 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 9
Development Plan Findings

1. The design and intensity of the proposed development plan is consistent with the goals and policies established by the general plan and the zoning code, particularly the purpose and intent of the zoning district in which the development project is located, because the project would provide for additional commercial, light-industrial, and warehouse uses consistent with the Commercial Service land use and Commercial Light-Industrial zoning designations.

2. The proposed development plan will not be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience and general welfare of the residents or businesses in the surrounding area, or be injurious or detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City, as a result of the site planning demonstrating required setbacks and adequate landscaping, screening, and separation from neighboring uses.

3. The proposed development plan accommodates the aesthetic quality of the City as a whole, especially where development will be visible from the gateways to the City scenic corridors, and the public right-of-way, based on the mixture of quality materials and landscaping.

4. The proposed development plan is compatible with, and is not detrimental to, surrounding land uses and improvements, provides appropriate visual appearance, and contributes to the mitigation of any environmental and social impacts as outlined in the project design documents and the MND prepared for this project.

5. The proposed development plan is compatible with existing scenic and environmental resources such as hillsides, stream courses, oak trees, vistas, and historic buildings and structures; because although six oak trees will be removed, additional mitigation oak trees will be planted onsite.

6. The proposed development plan contributes to the orderly development of the city as a whole by providing a well-designed project that is suitable for the location where it is proposed and surrounding land uses including commercial and light industrial uses, and the existing and future Chandler Ranch residential area to the south of Lot 13.

Planned Development Overlay District Findings

1. The granting of this permit will not adversely affect the policies, spirit and intent of the general plan, applicable specific plans, the zoning code and all other adopted codes, policies, and plans of the city because commercial, light-industrial, and warehousing uses are consistent with the intent of the Commercial Service General Plan land use designation.

2. The proposed project maintains and enhances significant natural resources on the site because it will retain two of eight oak trees and will incorporate additional replacement oak trees into the site’s landscape plan for the six oak trees to be removed.

3. The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to, and blend in with, the character of the site and surround area, and would not have an adverse effect on the public views from nearby roads and other public vantage points, because it will provide commercial, light-industrial,

Page 173 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 9
and warehouse buildings of similar scale and architectural quality as other businesses in the vicinity.

4. The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site is compatible with the established character and scale of surrounding development and would not be a disharmonious or disruptive element to the neighborhood because it similar scale and architectural quality as other businesses in the vicinity.

5. The development would be consistent with the purpose and intent of this Planned Development District chapter of the Zoning Ordinance and would not be contrary to the public health, safety, and welfare because it does not include significant modification from code requirements as can be permitted in the PD Overlay district.

6. Modification of the standards as set forth in this chapter or elsewhere in the zoning ordinance shall only be approved upon a finding that greater public benefit would be achieved through such modifications. Additionally, for planned development projects that are seeking an increase in allowable building heights, modification of the height limitations shall only be approved upon a finding that the proportion, scale, and nature of the project is such that the modifications would not create an adverse visual impact nor compromise the safety of occupants. The project does not include a modification of the height limit.

Conditional Use Permit Findings:

1. The project has been designed in a manner that provides a 6-foot decorative masonry wall and a 10-foot-wide landscape planter which will provide visual screen from the residentially zoned land (North Chandler Ranch) to the south as required by Section 21.13.030.F.1a & b., as a result of the wall and the planter area, and since this project is not proposing any outdoor storage of equipment or materials, the project has been designed to adequately screen the site from the residential land to the south.

2. The project has been designed with commercial and light-industrial uses that do not create noise, visual and/or land use impacts to neighboring land uses, because of the design of the project providing perimeter setbacks, walls, fencings, landscape planters to help separate the project from neighboring land uses.

3. The Covelop/MD3 project includes commercial light-industrial uses along with warehousing, which are uses that will not have a detrimental effect on the city’s goal to revitalizing the downtown.

4. Accordingly, the requested use will not, in these particular circumstances, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, nor will the use be injurious or detrimental to property or improvements in the neighborhood, or the general welfare of the City.

Oak Tree Removal Permit Finding

1. For the six (6) valley oak trees (Tree Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 11), although rated very poor condition, the necessity of the requested action is to allow reasonable use of the property

Page 174 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 9
for which it has been zoned by allowing construction of the project. Because these trees are rated in “very poor” condition, their health and status as a potential public nuisance/danger of falling warrant their removal, especially as mitigation trees will be planted.

2. Because the building has been considered for alternative designs and the site plan has undergone changes to retain the two healthiest oak trees on the property (Tree Nos. 10 and 13), every reasonable effort has been made to avoid impacting oak trees, consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 10.01.050.D. Additionally, mitigation trees (totaling 67.7-inches in diameter) are being provided with the new landscape plan for the project to mitigate for the loss of Trees. 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 11.

3. The removal of the requested oak trees will not have a long-term negative impact on soil retention, water retention, or diversion or increased flow of surface waters, as mitigation trees will be planted, two trees will remain onsite, and there are not otherwise grading, or drainage concerns raised by the application.

4. There are various oak trees in the general vicinity of the project site that will not be impacted by this action, and removal of the requested oak trees will not otherwise have long-term effects on shade areas, air pollution, or scenic beauty, as mitigation trees will provide such benefits in accordance with City standards.

5. Mitigation trees are proposed so as to ultimately retain the number of healthy trees that the subject parcel will support.

Code of Regulations §§ 15000 et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines), the City prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2023090132) (“MND”) that analyzed the proposed Project’s environmental impacts. The MND was made available to the public for review from September 11, 2023 through October 10, 2023. On February 20, 2024, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered the entire administrative record (as of that date), including staff reports, the MND, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (“MMRP”), and oral and written testimony from interested persons, all of whom were given an opportunity to be heard. Resolution No. 2023-__ recommends adoption of the MND and MMRP, and, among other things, properly assesses the environmental impact of the Project in accordance with CEQA. This Resolution incorporates by reference the environmental findings and analysis set forth in Resolution No. 2023-__, including the MND and MMRP, as if fully set forth herein.

Section 4: Approval. The City Council approves Planned Development 22-20, Conditional Use Permit 223- 14, and Oak Tree Removal Permit 23-11, subject to the following:

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
A Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
B Standard Conditions of Approval
C Revised Plan Set
D Oak Assessment Report

Page 175 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 9
APPROVED this 20th day of February 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Page 176 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 1 of 9
Site Specific Conditions of Approval – PD 22-20,
CUP 23-11 and OTR 23-11
Planning Division Conditions:

1. The applicant/developer shall comply with the checked standard Conditions of Approval, “Exhibit B” of Resolution 23-_____.

NOTE: In the event of conflict or duplication between standard and site-specific conditions, the site-specific condition shall supersede the standard condition.

2. The project shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the Conditions of Approval established by Resolution 23-______ and it shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the following Exhibits:

EXHIBITDESCRIPTION
A Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
B Standard Conditions of Approval
C PD Plan Set (AO1.-C4.4)

Page 177 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 2 of 9
D Arborist Report

3. PD22-20 shall allow for the subdivision, development plan, use permit, and oak tree removal permit to develop an approximate 14-acre site with six (6) commercial/light industrial buildings totaling 240,327 square feet.

4. Approval of this project is valid for a period of two (2) years from date of City Council approval.

Unless construction permits have been issued and site work has begun, the approval of Planned Development 22-20 shall expire on November 7, 2025. The Planning Commission may extend this expiration date if a Time Extension application has been filed with the City along with the fees before the expiration date.

5. The project phasing shall be substantially compliant with the following schedule:

6. Any condition imposed by the City Council in approving this Development Plan and Oak Tree Removal Permit may be modified or eliminated, or new conditions may be added, provided that the Planning Commission shall first conduct a public hearing in the same manner as required for the granting of the original permit. No such modification shall be made unless the Commission finds that such modification is necessary to protect the public interest and/or neighboring properties, or, in the case of deletion of an existing condition, that such action is necessary to permit reasonable operation and use under the Development Plan.

7. OTR23-11 allows for the removal of 6 Valley oak trees (Tree #’s 1, 2, 3, 4, 9 and 11), totaling 270- inches in diameter. Tree No. 10 and 13 shall be protected and subject to the tree preservation details outlined in the Arborist Report, attached as Exhibit S.

8. OTR 23-11 shall require the onsite planting of 67.5-inches in diameter of replacement trees, or 34, 1.5-inch caliper replacement Valley oaks.

9. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet.

Page 178 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 3 of 9

10. Before final inspection, the applicant shall submit a Certificate of Completion for the landscaping and irrigation installed.

11. Ongoing, the project shall be subject to the City Noise Ordinance.

12. When incorporating new oak trees into your landscape, you will need to allow for at least an 8’ x 8’ planting area. Curbing for the planting area shall not count as part of the planting area dimensions. Planting areas smaller than 8’x 8’ will result in sidewalk and curb buckling when tree roots mature. Distances between oak trees should be no less than 25 feet. If oak trees can be incorporated into open, non-hardscape areas, they will have a higher success rate. Planting trees in groups of 3, in larger landscape planting islands is also a great way to ensure better root health and tree survival rates while maximizing parking lot shade benefits.

13. The following precautions shall be taken to insure protection of Tree No. 10 and 13:
• Do not till or trench within the TPZ to install landscaping or irrigation. • Install only drought tolerant and preferably California native plants beneath the tree canopy.
• Irrigation shall be drip-type and all supply hoses shall be routed above ground. • Do not install overhead sprinkler irrigation because it will introduce too much moisture and potentially rot the tree’s roots.
• Do not install weed block cloth beneath the canopy of the tree. It restricts rainwater from percolating into the soil.
• Provide decorative bark as a top dressing to help retain moisture in the root zone. • Do not construct permanent concrete or brick patios beneath the canopy of the tree. • Install Raised deck patios. They are the preferred treatment for seating areas within the critical root zones of trees.

14. Prior to any construction or ground disturbing activities, the project arborist shall meet with all contractors involved with the development of this project to review tree protection measures.

Any new contractors brought on site shall also meet or communicate with the project arborist by phone or video conference to ensure they are aware of all tree protection measures.

15. If construction occurs during the months of June through November, the TPZs shall be irrigated to a depth of 12 inches 1 time before construction begins, which will ensure the trees are properly hydrated. Additional irrigations during construction may be recommended by the project arborist.

16. All work within or adjacent to the CRZs of oak trees will require arborist supervision to ensure that all tree protection measures are implemented. To avoid damage to critical roots, no machine use will be allowed in the TPZ. In order to prevent undue damage to roots when grading, the grading limits along the perimeter of the TPZ shall be dug by hand to the final grading depth. If a root 1” diameter or larger is exposed, it shall not be cut without the project arborist’s permission.

17. If the project arborist determines that a root over 1-inch diameter needs to be cut, it shall be cut by hand with a pruning saw or reciprocating saw. Once the entire perimeter outside the TPZ has been dug and roots are severed, the project arborist can approve use of machinery to complete excavation and grading if work is outside of the TPZ.

Page 179 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 4 of 9

18. A tree protection zone or TPZ is similar to a CRZ. Ideally it will be the same size as the CRZ, however it can be smaller. The general rule for CRZ encroachments is that they may be allowed if the impact to critical roots is not more than 25% with no disturbance of Structural Roots (large roots that provide anchorage and stability to the tree).

19. Once the TPZ limits have been established, tree protection fencing shall be provided for all trees listed for protection. Tree protection fencing is required to be in place for the duration of the construction project and shall be installed before starting any ground disturbing activities. • Do not remove any tree protection fencing or enter the TPZ without approval of the project arborist. The fencing shall delineate and protect the tree protection zone. • The fencing shall at minimum, be 4 feet tall and made of orange, high density, polyethylene with 3.5” x 1.5” openings. It shall be installed on steel posts 8 feet on center and tightly stretched to prevent sagging. I STRONGLY recommend installing 6’ X 8’ temporary, chain-link, fence panels secured to driven steel post. This is a more secure and less moveable option than vinyl fencing that can easily be moved by hand or run over by vehicles. See Appendix C - Tree Protection Diagrams & Photos - Diagram 2 – Temporary Chain-link Fence Panel.
• Trunk Protection shall also be provided – Often, the trunk of a tree will be damaged by construction equipment activities. In order to protect as much of the trunk as possible, 2” X 4” wood slats with a minimum height of 8’ shall be placed against the trunk of the tree and secured with wire or zip-ties. DO NOT use anchors such as screws or nails to connect to the trunk. See Appendix C – Tree Protection Diagrams - Diagram 3- Trunk Protection for more detail.
• Tree protection signs shall be placed on the TPZ fencing and be spaced 10 feet apart. Signs shall be weatherproof, and state, “Tree Protection Zone – Do Not Enter”. The signs shall also include the project manager’s and project arborist’s phone numbers. Signs shall remain in place until completion of the project. See Appendix C – Tree Protection Diagrams - Diagram 1 – Tree Protection Fencing for further detail. • No construction or ground disturbance shall be allowed inside the fenced TPZ or CRZ without the project arborist’s permission and/or oversite. If you are unsure whether an activity is allowed, refer to Appendix D - Tree Protection Requirements – Quick Reference List or contact the project arborist Rodney Thurman at 805 234 8760 APCD Conditions:

1. Portable equipment, 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, used during construction activities may require a California statewide portable equipment registration (issued by the California Air Resources Board) or an APCD permit. The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements but should not be viewed as exclusive:
• Power screens, conveyors, diesel engines, and/or crushers; • Portable generators and equipment with engines that are 50 hp or greater; • Electrical generation plants or the use of standby generators; • Internal combustion engines; and
• Tub grinders

Page 180 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 5 of 9

2. Operational sources may require APCD permits. The following list is provided as a guide to equipment and operations that may have permitting requirements but should not be viewed as exclusive:
• New wineries or expanding wineries with the capacity of 26,000 gallons (10,000 cases at twelve 750 milliliter bottles per case) year or more require a Permit to Operate for fermentation and storage of wine;
• Portable generators and equipment with engines that are 50 hp or greater; • Any stationary or portable agricultural engine over 50 hp; • Electrical generation plants or the use of standby generators; • Food and beverage preparation (primarily coffee roasters); • Furniture and fixture products;
• Metal industries, fabrication;
• Small scale manufacturing;
• Boilers;
• Internal combustion engines; and
• Sterilization units using ethylene oxide and incinerators.

3. This project exceeds the ROG+NOx Quarterly Tier 1 threshold; therefore the project’s construction phase shall implement Standard Construction Mitigation Measures:
• Maintain all construction equipment in proper tune according to manufacturer’s specifications;
• Fuel all off-road and portable diesel powered equipment with CARB certified motor vehicle diesel fuel (non-taxed version suitable for use off-road); • Use diesel construction equipment meeting CARB's Tier 2 certified engines or cleaner offroad heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State Off-Road Regulation; • Use on-road heavy-duty trucks that meet the CARB’s 2010 or cleaner certification standard for on-road heavy-duty diesel engines, and comply with the State On-Road Regulation; • Construction or trucking companies with fleets that that do not have engines in their fleet that meet the engine standards identified in the above two measures (e.g. captive or NOx exempt area fleets) may be eligible by proving alternative compliance; • All on and off-road diesel equipment shall not idle for more than 5-minutes. Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas and or job sites to remind drivers and operators of the 5-minute idling limit;
• Diesel idling within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors is not permitted;

4. Projects with grading areas more than 4 acres and/or within 1,000 feet of any sensitive receptor shall implement the following mitigation measures to manage fugitive dust emissions such that they do not exceed the APCD 20% opacity limit (APCD Rule 401) and minimize nuisance (APCD Rule 402) impacts:
a. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible; b. Use of water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site and from exceeding the APCD’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (non-potable) water should be used whenever possible. When drought conditions exist and water use is a concern, the contractor or builder should consider use of a dust suppressant that is effective for the specific site conditions to reduce the amount of water used for dust control. Please refer to

Page 181 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 6 of 9
the following link from the San Joaquin Valley Air District for a list of potential dust suppressants: Products Available for Controlling Dust;
c. All stockpiled dirt should be sprayed daily and covered with tarps or other dust barriers as needed;
d. All roadways, driveways, sidewalks, etc. to be paved should be completed as soon as possible, and building pads should be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding, soil binders or other dust controls are used;
e. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) or otherwise comply with California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 23114; f. “Track-Out” is defined as sand or soil that adheres to and/or agglomerates on the exterior surfaces of motor vehicles and/or equipment (including tires) that may then fall onto any highway or street as described in CVC Section 23113 and California Water Code 13304. To prevent ‘track out’, designate access points and require all employees, subcontractors, and others to use them. Install and operate a ‘track-out prevention device’ where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved streets. The ‘track-out prevention device’ can be any device or combination of devices that are effective at preventing track out, located at the point of intersection of an unpaved area and a paved road. Rumble strips or steel plate devices need periodic cleaning to be effective. If paved roadways accumulate tracked out soils, the track-out prevention device may need to be modified; g. All fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be shown on grading and building plans; h. The contractor or builder shall designate a person or persons whose responsibility is to ensure any fugitive dust emissions do not result in a nuisance and to enhance the implementation of the mitigation measures as necessary to minimize dust complaints and reduce visible emissions below the APCD’s limit of 20% opacity for greater than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. Their duties shall include holidays and weekend periods when work may not be in progress (for example, wind-blown dust could be generated on an open dirt lot). The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the APCD Compliance Division prior to the start of any grading, earthwork, or demolition (Contact the Compliance Division at 805-781-5912).
i. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project revegetation and landscape plans should be implemented as soon as possible, following completion of any soil disturbing activities;
j. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast germinating, non-invasive grass seed and watered until vegetation is established;
k. All disturbed soil areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting, or other methods approved in advance by the APCD; l. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site;
m. Sweep streets at the end of each day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved roads. Water sweepers shall be used with reclaimed water where feasible. Roads shall be pre-wetted prior to sweeping when feasible; and
n. Take additional measures as needed to ensure dust from the project site is not impacting areas outside the project boundary.

GHG Condition:

Page 182 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 7 of 9

1. The proposed project would be operational on or before 2028, therefore using the recently released updated guidance from SLO APCD, the applicable threshold should be 740 MT CO2e for operational year 2024, as identified in Table 2 (page 3-12) and Table 1-1 (pages 4-28 and 4-29) of the SLO APCD’s updated guidance document. This GHG threshold for 2028 is also included in the SLO APCD’s land use screening tool. As such, if Central Coast Community Energy is incorporated as a project feature, the GHG impacts would be less than significant when compared to the new thresholds.
a. Prior to the issuance of a final occupancy permit for the Phase 1 building on Lot 13, The applicant commits to the project receiving power from Central Coast Community Energy.

Engineering Division Conditions:

1. The applicant shall offer to dedicate a 30’ right of way for roadway purposes for Ardmore Road from centerline of street across the project northerly frontage. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

2. The applicant shall provide a 10’ public utility easement on the southerly side of the right of way for Ardmore Road across the project northerly frontage. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

3. The applicant shall offer to dedicate a 60’ right of way for roadway purposes for Street “A” as shown on the vesting tentative parcel map. TIMING: Prior to prior to final map recordation

4. The applicant shall provide a 10’ public utility easement on both sides of the right of way offered for Street “A”, as shown on the vesting tentative parcel map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

5. The applicant shall grant the City an Avigation Easement across all parcels in a form acceptable to the City Engineer. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

6. Public Storm Drain easements across Lot 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING:

Prior to final map recordation

7. Reciprocal drainage easement on northerly side of Lot 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

8. Reciprocal access easements on the northerly side of Parcel 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

9. Temporary grading easement on the northerly side of Lot 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

10. The applicant shall construct Ardmore Road along the northerly project frontage to provide a 40-foot curb to curb section, with sidewalk adjacent to back of curb except at driveway approaches. TIMING: Prior to acceptance of improvements

11. The applicant shall construct Street “A” to provide a 40-foot curb to curb section, with sidewalk adjacent to back of curb except at driveway approaches. TIMING: Prior to acceptance of improvements.

Page 183 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 8 of 9

12. The applicant shall install public improvements including, but not limited to, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, curb ramps, driveway approaches, streetlights, traffic signage, pavement markings, street signs, and barricades in accordance with City Engineering Standards or as modified on the vesting tentative parcel map. TIMING: Prior to acceptance of improvements.

13. The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Paso Robles to maintain bioretention basins within the Ardmore Road and Street “A” rights of way in perpetuity, as shown on the vesting tentative parcel map. This agreement will be required prior to acceptance of improvements.

14. The applicant shall mitigate additional storm water runoff generated by this project, including off-site improvements. Appropriate drainage facilities shall be designed in accordance with current City Standards. TIMING: Prior to grading final inspection Mitigation Measures – Conditions of Approval:

MM BIO-1: Vegetation removal and initial site disturbance shall be conducted between September 1 and January 31 outside of the nesting season for birds. If vegetation and/or tree removal is planned for the bird nesting season (February 1 to August 31), then preconstruction nesting bird surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any active nests would be impacted by project construction. If no active nests are found, then no further mitigation shall be required.

If any active nests are found that would be impacted by construction, then the nest sites shall be avoided with the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around active nests as determined by a qualified biologist. Nest sites shall be avoided and protected with the non-disturbance buffer zone until the adults and young of the year are no longer reliant on the nest site for survival as determined by a qualified biologist.

MM BIO-2: To avoid direct take of SJKF during construction in accordance with the CDFW and San Luis Obispo County Guide to SJKF Mitigation Procedures Under CEQA, the project owner shall adopt the Standard Kit Fox CEQA Mitigation Measures and shall be included on development plans. The following measures shall be implemented:
• A maximum 25 mph speed limit shall be required at the project site during construction activities.
• All construction activities shall cease at dusk and not start before dawn. • A qualified biologist shall be on-site immediately prior to initiation of project activities to inspect for any large burrows (e.g., known and potential dens) and to ensure no wildlife are injured during project activities. If dens are encountered, they should be avoided as discussed below. • Exclusion zone boundaries shall be established around all known and potential SJKF dens.
• All excavations deeper than 2 feet shall be completely covered at the end of each working day, or fitted with wildlife escape ramps. • All pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be inspected for SJKF and other wildlife before burying, capping, or moving.

Page 184 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval PD 22-20, CUP 23-11 Page 9 of 9
• All exposed openings of pipes, culverts, or similar structures shall be capped or temporarily sealed prior to the end of each working day. • All food-related trash shall be removed from the site at the end of each workday.
• Project-related equipment shall be prohibited outside of designated work areas and access routes.
• No firearms shall be allowed in the project area.
• Disturbance to burrows shall be avoided to the greatest extent feasible. • No rodenticides or herbicides should be applied in the project area. • Permanent fences between any remaining habitat areas shall allow for SJKF passage through or underneath (i.e., an approximate 4-inch passage gap shall remain at ground level).
• To avoid take of any SJKF and/or active SJKF dens, within 30 days prior to the initiation of site disturbance, implement the SJKF den survey and den closure protocol for unoccupied dens. Any SJKF occupied dens shall be avoided until the SJKF leave the den/site.
• Prior to issuance of grading and/or construction permit and within 30 days prior to initiation of site disturbance and/or construction, all personnel associated with the project shall attend a worker education training program, conducted by a qualified biologist, to avoid or reduce impacts on sensitive biological resources (i.e. San Joaquin kit fox). At a minimum, as the program relates to the kit fox, the training shall include the kit fox’s life history, all mitigation measures specified by the City, as well as any related biological report(s) prepared for the project. The applicant shall notify the City shortly prior to this meeting. A kit fox fact sheet shall also be developed prior to the training program, and distributed at the training program to all contractors, employers and other personnel involved with the construction of the project.
• During the site-disturbance and/or construction phase, any contractor or employee that inadvertently kills or injures a San Joaquin kit fox or who finds any such animal either dead, injured, or entrapped shall be required to report the incident immediately to the applicant and City. In the event that any observations are made of injured or dead kit fox, the applicant shall immediately notify the USFWS and CDFW by telephone. In addition, formal notification shall be provided in writing within three working days of the finding of any such animal(s). Notification shall include the date, time, location and circumstances of the incident. Any threatened or endangered species found dead or injured shall be turned over immediately to CDFW for care, analysis, or disposition.

MM CUL-1 In the event that cultural resources including human remains are encountered during ground disturbance activity, the project shall stop all activity within a 100-foot radius of the find and the project archaeologist shall access the situation with the County Coroner to verify the next steps and determine when construction may resume.

Page 185 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

STANDARD DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
Development Plan – PD22-20 Conditional Use Permit – CUP 23-14 Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map VTTM 22-0054
Approval Body: City Council Date of Approval:

Applicant: Covelop/MD3 Location: 2930 Union Road
APN: 025-362-043
The following conditions that have been checked are standard conditions of approval for the above referenced project. The checked conditions shall be complied with in their entirety before the project can be finalized, unless otherwise specifically indicated. In addition, there may be site specific conditions of approval that apply to this project in the resolution.

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - The applicant shall contact the Community Development Department, (805) 237-3970, for compliance with the following conditions:

A. GENERAL CONDITIONS – PD/CUP:

1. This project approval shall expire on _TBD_____________unless a time extension request is filed with the Community Development Department, or a State mandated automatic time extension is applied prior to expiration.

2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans and unless specifically provided for through the Planned Development and/or Conditional Use Permit process shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Zoning Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Specific Plans.

3. To the extent allowable by law, Owner agrees to hold City harmless from costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by City or held to be the liability of City in connection with City’s defense of its actions in any proceeding brought in any State or Federal court challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project.

Owner understands and acknowledges that City is under no obligation to defend any legal actions challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project.

4. Any site-specific condition imposed by the City Council in approving this project (PD 22-20) may be modified or eliminated, or new conditions may be added, provided that the Planning Commission shall first conduct a public hearing in the same manner as required for the approval of this project. No such modification shall be made unless the Commission finds that such modification is necessary to protect the public interest and/or neighboring properties, or, in the casof deletion of an existing Exhibit B

Page 186 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
condition, that such action is necessary to permit reasonable operation and use for this approval.

5. The site shall be kept in a neat manner at all times and the landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition.

6. All signs shall be subject to review and approval as required by Municipal Code Section 21.19 and shall require a separate application and approval prior to installation of any sign.

7. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a landscape and irrigation plan consistent with the Landscape and Irrigation Ordinance, shall be submitted for City review and approval. The plan needs to be designed in a manner that utilizes drought tolerant plants, trees and ground covers and minimizes, if not eliminates the use of turf. The irrigation plan shall utilize drip irrigation and limit the use of spray irrigation. All existing and/or new landscaping shall be installed with automatic irrigation systems.

8. A reciprocal parking and access easement and agreement for site access, parking, and maintenance of all project entrances, parking areas, landscaping, hardscape, common open space, areas and site lighting standards and fixtures, shall be recorded prior to or in conjunction with the Final Map. Said easement and agreement shall apply to all properties, and be referenced in the site Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs).

9. All outdoor storage shall be screened from public view by landscaping and walls or fences per Section 21.21.110 of the Municipal Code.

10. For commercial, industrial, office or multi-family projects, all refuse enclosures are required to provide adequate space for recycling bins. The enclosure shall be architecturally compatible with the primary building. Gates shall be view obscuring and constructed of durable materials. Check with Paso Robles Waste Disposal to determine the adequate size of enclosure based on the number and size of containers to be stored in the enclosure.

11. For commercial, industrial, office or multi-family projects, all existing and/or new ground-mounted appurtenances such as air-conditioning condensers, electrical transformers, backflow devices etc., shall be screened from public view through the use of decorative walls and/or landscaping subject to approval by the Community Development Director or his designee. Details shall be included in the building plans.

12. All existing and/or new roof appurtenances such as air-conditioning units, grease hoods, etc. shall be screened from public view. The screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed of compatible materials to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or his designee. Details shall be included in the building plans.

Exhibit B

Page 187 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

13. All existing and/or new lighting shall be shielded so as to be directed downward in such a manner as to not create off-site glare or adversely impact adjacent properties.

The style, location and height of the lighting fixtures shall be submitted with the building plans and shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director or his designee.

14. All walls/fences and exposed retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative materials which include but are not limited to splitface block, slumpstone, stuccoed block, brick, wood, crib walls or other similar materials as determined by the Development Review Committee, but specifically excluding precision block.

16. It is the property owner’s responsibility to ensure that all construction of private property improvements occur on private property. It is the owner’s responsibility to identify the property lines and ensure compliance by the owner’s agents.

17. Any existing Oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved as required in City Ordinance No.835 N.S., Municipal Code No. 10.01 “Oak Tree Preservation”, unless specifically approved to be removed. An Oak tree inventory shall be prepared listing the Oak trees, their disposition, and the proposed location of any replacement trees required. In the event an Oak tree is designated for removal, an approved Oak Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City, prior to removal.

18. No storage of trash cans or recycling bins shall be permitted within the public rightof-way.

19. Prior to recordation of the map or prior to occupancy of a project, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Developer Director or his designee.

20. Two sets of the revised Planning Commission approved plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval, standard and site specific, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits.

21. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
Development Review Committee shall approve the following:

Planning Division Staff shall approve the following:
a. A detailed site plan indicating the location of all structures, parking layout, outdoor storage areas, walls, fences, light fixtures and trash enclosures;
b. A detailed landscape plan;
c. Detailed building elevations of all structures indicating materials, colors, and architectural treatments;
d. Other:

B. GENERAL CONDITIONS – TRACT/PARCEL MAP:

Exhibit B

Page 188 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

1. In accordance with Government Section 66474.9, the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, or its agent, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding brought within the time period provided for in Government Code section 66499.37, against the City, or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void, annul the City's approval of this subdivision.

The City will promptly notify subdivider of any such claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense thereof.

2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and/or Articles Affecting Real Property Interests are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and/or the City Attorney.

They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the affected City Departments.

3. The owner shall petition to annex residential Tract (or Parcel Map)________ into the City of Paso Robles Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 for the purposes of mitigation of impacts on the City’s Police and Emergency Services Departments.

4. Street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission, prior to approval of the final map.

5. The following areas shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, Homeowners’ Association, or other means acceptable to the City:
________________________________________________________ ****************************************************************************** ENGINEERING DIVISION- The applicant shall contact the Engineering Division, (805) 237- 3860, for compliance with the following conditions:

All conditions marked are applicable to the above referenced project for the phase indicated.

C. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK:

1. The applicant shall enter into an Engineering Plan Check and Inspection Services Agreement with the City.

D. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT:

1. Prior to approval of a grading plan, the developer shall apply through the City, to FEMA and receive a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) issued from FEMA. The developer's engineer shall provide the required supporting data to justify the application.

2. Any existing Oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved as required in City Ordinance No. 553, Municipal Code No. 10.01 "Oak Tree Exhibit B

Page 189 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Preservation", unless specifically approved to be removed. An Oak tree inventory shall be prepared listing the Oak trees, their disposition, and the proposed location of any replacement trees required. In the event an Oak tree is designated for removal, an approved Oak Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City, prior to its removal.

3. A complete grading and drainage plan shall be prepared for the project by a registered civil engineer and subject to approval by the City Engineer. The project shall conform to the City’s Storm Water Discharge Ordinance.

4. A Soils and/or Geology Report providing technical specifications for grading of the site shall be prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer.

5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan per the State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity shall be provided for any site that disturbs greater than or equal to one acre, including projects that are less than one acre that are part of a larger plan of development or sale that would disturb more than one acre.

E. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:

1. All off-site public improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and acceptance. The improvements shall be designed and constructed to the City Standard Details and Specifications or as approved by the City Engineer.

2. The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan signed as approved by a representative of each public utility.

3. Landscape and irrigation plans for the public right-of-way shall be incorporated into the improvement plans and shall require approval by the Parks/Facilities Maintenance Supervisor and the Community Development Department.

4. In a special Flood Hazard Area as indicated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) the owner shall provide an Elevation Certificate in accordance with the National Flood Insurance program. This form must be completed by a land surveyor or civil engineer licensed in the State of California.

F. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:

The Planning Commission has made a finding that the fulfillment of the construction requirements listed below are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area.

1. The applicant shall pay any current and outstanding fees for Engineering Plan Checking and Construction Inspection services.

Exhibit B

Page 190 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

2. All public improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, and accepted by the City Council for maintenance.

3. The owner shall offer to dedicate and improve the following street(s) to the standard indicated:

Street Name City Standard Drawing No.

Ardmore Road Modified A-4
“A” Street Modified A-4

4. If, at the time of approval of the final map, any required public improvements have not been completed and accepted by the City the owner shall be required to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

Bonds required and the amount shall be as follows:

Performance Bond...............100% of improvement costs.

Labor and Materials Bond........50% of performance bond.

5. If the existing City street adjacent to the frontage of the project is inadequate for the traffic generated by the project, or will be severely damaged by the construction, the applicant shall excavate the entire structural section and replace it with a standard half-width street plus a 12' wide travel lane and 8' wide graded shoulder adequate to provide for two-way traffic.

6. If the existing pavement and structural section of the City street adjacent to the frontage of the project is inadequate, the applicant shall provide a new structural section from the proposed curb to the edge of pavement and shall overlay the existing paving to centerline for a smooth transition.

7. Due to the number of utility trenches required for this project, the City Council adopted Pavement Management Program requires a pavement overlay on _________________ along the frontage of the project.

8. The applicant shall install all utilities. Street lights shall be installed at locations as required by the City Engineer. All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or within the project shall be relocated underground except for electrical lines 77 kilovolts or greater. All utilities shall be extended to the boundaries of the project.

9. The owner shall offer to dedicate to the City the following easement(s). The location and alignment of the easement(s) shall be to the description and satisfaction of the City Engineer:
a. Public Utilities Easement;
b. Water Line Easement;
Exhibit B

Page 191 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
c. Sewer Facilities Easement;
d. Landscape Easement;
e. Storm Drain Easement.

10. The developer shall annex to the City's Landscape and Lighting District for payment of the operating and maintenance costs of the following:
a. Street lights;
b. Parkway/open space landscaping;
c. Wall maintenance in conjunction with landscaping;
d. Graffiti abatement;
e. Maintenance of open space areas.

11. For a building with a Special Flood Hazard Area as indicated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program. This form must be completed by a lands surveyor or civil engineer licensed in the State of California.

12. All final property corners shall be installed prior to final occupancy.

13. All areas of the project shall be protected against erosion by hydro seeding or landscaping.

14. All construction refuse shall be separated (i.e. concrete, asphalt concrete, wood gypsum board, etc.) and removed from the project in accordance with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element.

15. Electronic record drawings, signed by the engineer of record, shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the final inspection. An electronic autocad drawing file registered to the California State Plane – Zone 5 / NAD83 projected coordinate system, units in survey feet, shall also be provided.
****************************************************************************** Exhibit B

Page 192 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

STANDARD DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
Project:

Planning Number: Date:

The following are standard conditions of approval for the above referenced project. The checked conditions shall be complied with in their entirety before the project can be finalized, unless otherwise specifically indicated. In addition, there may be site specific conditions of approval that apply to this project in the resolution. The Project Conditions of Approval do not include all mandatory code requirements. Code compliance will be verified throughout the project which may include additional requirements applicable to your project. Referenced standards include the adopted current code cycle for the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), Paso Robles Municipal Code (PRMC), and the Paso Robles Standard Details and Specifications.

Applicant shall contact PRFES, (805) 227-7560, for compliance with the following conditions:

G. GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. Prior to the start of construction:

Plans shall be reviewed, approved, and permit issued by PRFES for Underground Fire Line (underground fire line shown on any civil set is for reference only and shall indicate so on each civil page).

Applicant shall provide documentation to PRFES that required fire flows can be provided to meet project demands. Refer to CFC Appendix B.

Exhibit B
Covelop P22-0123 10/04/2023 ✔
✔
✔

Page 193 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

2. Prior to delivery of combustible materials:

Fire hydrants shall be installed and operative to current, adopted edition of the CFC. Refer to CFC Appendix C & CC.

Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be located on the addressed side of the building and within 150 feet of a fire hydrant, and must not block collector or arterial roadways. Refer to PRMC.

An all-weather access road sufficient to support fire apparatus weighing up to 75,000 lbs. shall be constructed and maintained for the duration of the construction phase of the project. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Access roads shall be at least 20’ in width with at least 13’ 6” of vertical clearance. All driveway and access roads shall be 10% or less in slope unless approved by PRFES. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Truck access road shall be minimum 26’ in width with at least 13’ 6” of vertical clearance. Minimum set-back 15’, maximum 30’. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Provide temporary turn-around for phased construction streets that exceed 150’ in length. Refer to Paso Robles Standard Details and Specifications.

Project shall provide a secondary access fire road approved by PRFES. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Exhibit B
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Page 194 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

3. Provide on address side of building if applicable:

Fire alarm annunciator panel location to be approved by PRFES.

Knox Box key entry box or system.

FDC location and access path must be approved by PRFES.

Minimum 6” high, contrasting background address numbers with location, size, and contrast to be approved by PRFES.

For buildings or group of buildings (five units or more) served by an alley or interior driveway, the numbers or alphabetical designation shall be displayed on a directory or annunciator board, approved by the Fire Marshal, at each driveway or alley entrance. Senior housing, retirement villas, hotel and motel annunciator boards shall be of a Graphic type. The property owner, Homeowner's Association or individual in charge of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the directory.

4. Provide a central station monitored fire sprinkler system for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings that require fire sprinklers in the current, adopted edition of the CBC, CFC, and PRMC. Plans shall be reviewed, approved, and permits issued by PRFES for the installation of fire sprinkler and alarm systems.

5. Provide class 1 standpipe system(s) with 2 ½” hose connections to supply water for use by fire department personnel at each floor in accordance to NFPA 14 for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings that are or exceed three (3) stories in height or above 30’. Location shall be at the entrance/exit way of the stairway system. Travel distance greater than 200’ will compel additional standpipe system(s) in each stairwell.

6. Motorized Gates blocking fire access require a separate PRFES permit, must include PRFES Knox Key Switch access (not CALFIRE), and meet CFC requirements. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Exhibit B
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Page 195 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

7. Provide permanent turn-around for driveway/access roads that exceed 150’ in length. See Paso Robles Standard Details and Specification Standard.

8. Fire extinguisher placement shall be approved by PRFES.

9. Landscape plant selections shall be fire resistive within 30’ of structures.

10. Landscape trees (including potential crown at maturity) must not project into required vertical clearance of the fire access lanes.

11. Project shall comply with all requirements in current, adopted edition of CFC and PRMC.

12. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy:

Final inspections shall be completed on all underground fire lines, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems and chemical hood fire suppression systems.

A site pre-fire plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Marshal. Contact the Paso Robles Fire Prevention Office for the exact requirements.

A Final Fire Walk-through inspection shall be completed on all buildings.

Additional Notes:

Exhibit B
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Page 196 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit C

Page 197 of 356 ends

5 8
5 10
6 9
41 43
6 9
9 6
7 3
6 7
12 7
5 8
4 8
6 CCC

CCCCCCCCCC
MC
MC
MC
MC

MCMCMCMC
CC
10 CC 10
CC
CCCC
9 5
6 7
6 LOADING DOCKS

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
7 2 6 32 3 2
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC
EVC

EVCEVCEVCEVC

EVCEVCEVCEVCEVCEVC
ARDMORE EXT. BLDG
1 ARDMORE RD
BLDG
3 125,812 SF
23,370 SF
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE

PARALLEL PARKING

SERVICE/LOADING
BLDG
4 13,950 SF
BLDG
5 22,565 SF
BLDG
6 45,270 SF

SERVICE/LOADING
60'
ROW
30'
10'
PUE
10'
PUE 10' PUE
40'
BLDG
2 9,360 SF
25'
FR. FR.

FR.

FR.
200'
18'
18'
Date
JULY 24, 2023
Sheet
ARDMORE INDUSTRIAL Scale
A1.0
1" = 80' @ 11x171" = 40' @ 24x36

PROJECT DATA DATA
LOT 13 - BLDG 1
USES:

OFFICE 9,000 SF
WAREHOUSE 116,812 SF
TOTAL AREA: 125,812 SF
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 144 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 154 SPACES* *INCLUDES 43 COMPACT SPACES & 8 ADA SPACES
*INCLUDES 10 EVC SPACES PER CGBSC TABLE 5.106.5.3.3

MOTORCYCLE PARKING REQUIRED
1 SPACE PER 20 VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED: 8 SPACES
TOTAL MOTORCYCLE PARKING PROVIDED: 8 SPACES
USES:

COMMERCIAL/RETAIL 7,392 SF
STORAGE 40,271 SF
MANUFACTURING 25,836 SF
WINEMAKING 41,016 SF
TOTAL AREA: 114,515 SF
TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 156 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 156 SPACES** **INCLUDES 23 COMPACT SPACES AND 8 ADA SPACES**INCLUDES 10 EVC SPACES PER CGBCS TABLE 5.106.5.3.3

MOTORCYCLE PARKING REQUIRED
1 SPACE PER 20 VEHICLE SPACES REQUIRED: 8 SPACES
MOTORCYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 8 SPACES
PARCEL A & B - BLDG 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6

PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL

SITE PLAN

REFERENCE NOTES
1: EXISTING OAK TREE TO REMAIN AND BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE
2: PROPERTY LINE
3: SETBACK LINE
4: RETENTION BASIN
5: SIDEWALK
6: CENTERLINE OF ARDMORE ROAD7: LANDSCAPE
8: RETAINING WALL/CURB
9: FENCING, SEE FENCING LEGEND ON

LANDSCAPE PLAN
10: TRASH ENCLOSURE11: SITE LIGHTING12: STREET TREES. SEE PLANTING PALETTE13: EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED MONUMENT SIGN.

SEE SITE AMENITIES DETAILS
14: DEPRESSED LOADING DOCK15: LOADING SPACE16: AMENITY FACING COMMERCIAL SPACE

SHOWN HATCHED
17: PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE18: FIRE SPRINKLER BACK FLOW DEVICE19: PRIVATE SHARED ACCESS DRIVEWAY 20: MAINTENANCE PATH21: 8' WIDE ACCESS GATE22: FIRE HYDRANT23: DECORATIVE BLOCK WALL AT SOUTHERN

BOUNDARY
5 7 6
15 TYP.
12 4
4 9
16 16
1 1
9 10
10 10 10
10 5
5 14
13 13
13 2
2 3
3 3
23 15
TYP.
11 11
TYP.
12 7

CONCEPTUAL OVERALL SITE PLAN
0 NORTH
20 40 80
17 17
17 LOT 13

PARCEL A

PARCEL B
PARCEL
A
PARCEL
B
8 8
8 8
19 20 21
9 8
11 18
18 18
22 22
11 22
22 14
22 22
22 22
22 22
22 22
Exhibit C

Page 198 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 199 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 200 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 201 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 202 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 203 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 204 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 205 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 206 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 207 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 208 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 209 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 210 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 211 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 212 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 213 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 214 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 215 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 216 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 217 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 218 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 219 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 220 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 221 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 222 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 223 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 224 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 225 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 226 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 227 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 228 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 229 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 230 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 231 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 232 of 356 ends

Exhibit C

Page 233 of 356 ends

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
815
81 820
820
820
820
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
830 830 830 830 835 835
830
827 828 829
831
831
832
832
825
830
827
828
829
829
833
832
830 829828
829
829
828
827
826
830

WL WL WL WL WL WL WL
CO

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL
833
831
GA
823
820
820
825
830
825
CO
825

30.00' OFFER OF

DEDICATION FOR

ROAD PURPOSES

30.00' PROPOSED OFFER OF

DEDICATION OF ROAD PURPOSES
(PER SEPARATE DOCUMENT)

EXISTING GROSS

7.54 AC

PARCEL B
118773.33 SF

2.73 AC

DEDICATION FOR

30.00' OFFER OF

ROAD PURPOSES
N 88°08'05" W 159.97'
S 1°46'02" W 229.58'
S 1°51'55" W 187.04'
N 1°51'56" E 660.02' TRACT BOUNDARY
S 88°52'18" E 496.15' TRACT BOUNDARY
N 88°54'03" W 498.96' TRACT BOUNDARY
S 1°37'19" W 659.73' TRACT BOUNDARY
N 88°08'05" W 132.02'
S 1°51'55" W 10.18'
N 88°08'05" W 62.48'
113.01'
S1°36'50"W 422.07'
S53°54'55"E 26.41'
S88°52'17"E 444.50'
S1°38'23"W 192.55'
385.95'

PARCEL A
175717.95 SF

4.03 AC

10.00' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
EASEMENT NOTE:

PRIVATE RECIPROCAL VEHICULAR ACCESS, RECIPROCAL PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,

RECIPROCAL PARKING, STORM DRAIN & DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND PUE OVER ALL

OF PARCELS A & B, INCLUSIVE, EXCLUDING BUILDING LOCATIONS FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PARCEL OWNERS OF PARCELS A & B.

SURVEY NOTES:

1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY BY TUCKER J. SANDERS AT NORTH COAST ENGINEERING.

BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON RECORD INFORMATION. a. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN (IF ANY) ARE BASED ON ABOVE-GROUND STRUCTURES (WHERE AVAILABLE). ACTUAL LOCATION MAY VARY. THEY ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND NEED TO BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.
b. ADDITIONAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY SERVICE LINES TO THE PROPERTY MAY EXIST. FOR INFORMATION REGARDING UTILITY LOCATIONS, SIZE, DEPTH, CONDITION, AND CAPACITY, CONTACT UTILITY OWNERS.
c. SITE ADDRESS = 2930, 2940/2/4 UNION RD, PASO ROBLES, CA. 612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

DATE SIGNEDSIGNATURE
These plans and specifications, and the ideas and
designs incorporated herein, are instruments ofservice prepared for the construction of work shown hereon and shall not be used in whole or in part for
any other project without written authority of Wallace
Group, a California Corporation.

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
SHEET
FILE NAME: 0751-0005 TENT PMAP.DWG Plot Date: 7/26/2023 Ardmore Industrial
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. PR-22-0054
0751.0005TZ-GMRMS07/26/2023
T1.0
1 ARDMORE ROAD
(IN FEET)

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 80
1 IN = 40 FT
0 20
46 101

CITY LIMITS

PROJECT
SITE
CITY of El PASO de ROBLES
VICINITY MAP:

UTILITIES:

WATER: City of El Paso de Robles
SEWER: City of El Paso de Robles
ELECTRICITY: PG&E
GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS Co.

TELEPHONE: AT&T
CABLE TV: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PARCEL INFORMATION:

Address: 2930 Union Rd, Paso Robles CA 93446Assessor's Parcel Number: A portion of 025-362-043 Existing Lot 6 Gross Lot Area: 7.54 Acres -ExistingNet Lot Area: 6.76 Acres -ProposedNumber of New Parcels: 2 Parcels Parcel A Parcel Area: 4.03 Acres
Parcel B Parcel Area: 2.73 Acres
PROJECT INFORMATION:

Being a subdivision of Lot 6 of Golden Hills Orchard Tract in the County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, as shown on map recorded in Book 2, Page 50 of Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, State of California, being 7.54 gross acres.

LEGEND:

PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET OFFER OF DEDICATION.PROPOSED OFFER OF DEDICATION OF ROAD PURPOSES (PER SEPARATE DOCUMENT).

LOT 13 GOLDEN HILLS ORCHARDS TRACT APN 025-362-043
PARCEL 2 82 PM 86 APN 025-362-045 LOT 7 GOLDEN HILLS ORCHARDS TRACT APN 025-362-040 PARCEL C O.R. 00-012192 APN 025-362-037 PARCEL B O.R. 00-012193 APN 025-362-036 LOT 3 - GOLDEN HILLS ORCHARDS TRACT - APN 025-362-043 LOT 6 GOLDEN HILLS ORCHARDS TRACT APN 025-362-043

41.00' Existing Road Section

30.00' 10.00' 10.00' 5.00' 5.00'

60.00'

5.00' 5.00' 20.00' 20.00' 5.00' 5.00'

ARDMORE ROAD STREET SECTION

NEW ROAD STREET SECTION

ARDMORE EXTENSION

60.00'
BIOSWALE1.00'
R/W

R/W R/WR/W
CLCL

20.00' 5.00'

10.00' PUE

10.00'
PUE

PARCEL A PARCEL B
10' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PER 82 PM 86
15' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT
PER 144 DEEDS 138PER 82/PM/86

40.00'

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS

EASEMENT

20.00' 20.00'

35.00'

RECIPROCAL DRAINAGE

EASEMENT

BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT

15.00' 20.00' TEMPORARY GRADING EASEMENT BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE

BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT

BY SEPARATE

DOCUMENT
Exhibit C

Page 234 of 356 ends

LOT 13
2/MB/50
LOT 6
2/MB/50

ARDMORE RD
ARDMORE ROAD 50 100 (IN FEET) 25 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 50 FT
0 REFERENCE NOTES:

XXX DEMOLITION
1 EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED. 2 EXISTING FENCING TO BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED
3 EXISTING UTILITIES AND POLES REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED 4 REMOVE EXISTING TREE
5 EXITING AC PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED

DEMOLITION NOTES

1. DEMOLISH DESIGNATED PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES AND APPURTENANCES IN ORDERLY AND CAREFUL MANNER.

2. CONTACT UTILITY COMPANIES 5 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT

OF WORK FOR ANY FACILITIES THAT MAY NEED TO BE SALVAGED BY THE SPECIFIC COMPANY.

3. ASSUME POSSESSION OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. REMOVE DEMOLISHED MATERIALS FROM SITE AT LEAST DAILY.

4. PREVENT AIRBORNE DUST. USE WATER OR DUST PALLIATIVE WHEN NECESSARY. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN HOSES AND CONNECTIONS TO WATER MAIN OR HYDRANT.

5. DO NOT BURN MATERIALS ON SITE.6. IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY, REMOVE, AND DISPOSE OF CONTAMINATED,

VERMIN INFESTED, OR DANGEROUS MATERIALS BY SAFE MEANS SO AS NOT TO ENDANGER HEALTH OF WORKERS AND PUBLIC.

7. ROUGH GRADE AREAS AFFECTED BY DEMOLITION OR GRADE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.
4 4
4 4
4 4
1 3
1 5

PROTECT

CRITICAL ROOT ZONE

PROTECT
2 2
2 4
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
3 FILE NAME: 751-05 TOPO-DEMO.DWG Plot Date: 7/26/2023
Demo Plan
C1.1
2 OF
Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
2 (E)WATER TANK

TEMPORARY GRADING

EASEMENT
15' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT
PER 144 DEEDS 138
Exhibit C

Page 235 of 356 ends

UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL
CO
Steering AngleLock to Lock TimeArticulating Angle
WB-67Trailer TrackTractor TrackTrailer WidthTractor Width

4.00 19.50
feet

8.50 : 8.50

8.008.00
:::

0.00 3.00 45.50

15.00 53.00
::: 6.0

28.475.0

8.50 19.90

44.00 Steering Angle : 33.3

8.508.506.0
Paso Robles Ladder Truck
feet
:::

WidthTrackLock to Lock Time
40'
40'
26' 26' 26'
26'
26'
24'

ARDMORE ROAD

ARDMORE ROAD
(IN FEET)

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 80
1 IN = 40 FT
0 20
FUTURE

THROUGH ROAD
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
FILE NAME: 751-05 TRUCK.DWG Plot Date: 7/26/2023

26.00'

26.05'

26.00'

26.04'

28.70'

60.00'

30.00'

26.00'

8.00'

16.00'

9.00'

18.00'

9.00'

16.00'

18.00'

9.00'

8.00'

16.00'

9.00'

18.00'

9.00'

9.00'
Truck Circulation Plan
C2.1
3 OF
Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS

36.00' 24.00'
Exhibit C

Page 236 of 356 ends

>
>
829.85 FF
829.30 FF
829.00 FF
828.10 FF
815
81 820
820
820
820
25 825
825
825
825
825
825
825
830
830
830
830
835
835
830
827 828 829
831
831
832
832
825
830
827
828
829
829
825
830
828
829
829
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD

SD SD SD
SD SD

SD SD SD SD
SD SD
SD SD
828.20 FF
827826
829
830
831
833
832
830
829
828
829
829
828
827
826
830
(832.49)
(830.20)
829.05 FF
828
828
826
827
828
819
829
829
829
828
828
830
828
829
829
827
833
831

4.27% 2.93%

1.90%

1.50%

0.49%

2.00%

1.23%

1.84%

2.00%

2.30%

0.51% 0.61% 0.69% 0.67% 0.60% 0.86% 0.62%

0.54% 0.50% 0.59%

3.8:1

2.03%

3.14%

1.38%

2.00%

1.76%

2.00%

0.50%

3.59%

2.29%

0.56% 0.54%

4.50% 1.50% 0.50% 0.60% 1.00% 1.25% 0.50%

1.64%

2.00%

3.52%

2.00%

7.58%

5.88%

2.93%

1.77%

2.06%

1.93%

2.52%

0.50%

0.50% 0.50%

2.00%

1.04%

1.13% 0.99%

0.51%

0.59%

1.81%

3.69%

2.03%

3.99%

0.98%

2.07%

3.61%

2.98%

2.52%

0.50% 0.49% 0.83% 0.83% 2.00%

3.96%

2.89%

1.99%

3.50%

3.82%

1.90%

3.24%

3.64%

2.73%

2.93%
SD

9.09%
FG: 823.53
814.00 BTM

1.92%

1.50%
SD SD 0 5. 2.98%
0 50%

2. 50%
2 0% 0.50%

0.51%

2.07%

2.00%
823
820 821
822
824
820
825
830
825
825
824
822
821

3.00%

0.50%

1.00%
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 20 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+90 0.74% 0.79% 1.62% 1.08% 1.67% ARDMORE RD (N-S) STA: 10+30.00 = STA: 1+07.51 STREET "A" 0.50% 0.50% 0.86% 0.81% 815
820
825
820
830
833
829

3.0:1

3.0:1
825

0.50%
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > >
N 1°37'19" E
S 88°52'18" E
15' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT
PER 144 DEEDS 138
10' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PER 82 PM 86
> > >
>

ARDMORE ROAD
(IN FEET)

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 80
1 IN = 40 FT
0 20
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

ARDMORE ROAD

60.00'

40.00'
40'

20.00'
Grading Plan
C3.1
4 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
10 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
13 3 3
3 3
4 4 4
4 4
4 4 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 7
7 6 6 6 6 6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
6 6
8 8 8
8 9
10 10
9 9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 11
11 11 11
12 12
14 4
14 14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 14
14 15 15
15 17
18 18 18
14 18
19 19
19 19
19 19
19 19
19 19
19 (E)FH (E)FH
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 20
20 20 20
20 (E) 2- 24" SD

RELOCATED (E)FH
STREET "A"

EARTHWORK CALC'S & NOTES
(BASED ON FINISH GRADE)
CUT: 19,803± CU.YD.

FILL: 43,515± CU.YD.

NET FILL: 23,712± CU.YD.

MAX. HEIGHT CUT: 9.5'±MAX HEIGHT FILL: 13.5'±MAX SLOPE: 2:1 (50%)

1. NO SHRINKAGE OR EXPANSION WAS CONSIDERED IN CALCULATION.

2. QUANTITIES ESTIMATED SHOWN IN THIS PLAN ARE TO BE USED FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ESTIMATE QUANTITIES FOR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTION & BIDDING.3. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 14.3 ± ACRES

4. SLOPES OF FILL SURFACES TO NOT EXCEED (2:1) 2 HORIZONTAL TO 1 VERTICAL.

5. PROTECT ALL EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE.

6. SHRINKAGE, CONSOLIDATION AND SUBSIDENCE FACTORS AND LOSSES DUE TO CLEARING AND DEMOLITION OPERATIONS ARE NOT INCLUDED. ESTIMATED

EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ARE BASED ON THE APPROXIMATE DIFFERENCE BETWEENEXISTING GRADES AND PROPOSED GRADES, AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS, AND SHOULD VARY ACCORDING TO THESE FACTORS AND LOSSES.7. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE AND THE GEOTECHNICAL

REPORT(S), SHALL ACCEPT OR CONFIRM EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION,

SHALL PERFORM AN INDEPENDENT EARTHWORK QUANTITY ESTIMATE, AND SHALL BID ACCORDINGLY.
16 16
14 14

REFERENCE KEYNOTES

DESCRIPTION
1 ASPHALT CONCRETE
2 CONCRETE DRIVING SURFACE
3 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER
4 6" CONCRETE CURB & 24" GUTTER PER CITY OF

PASO ROBLES
5 6" CONCRETE CURB PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES6 UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN 7 SAWCUT AND MATCH POINT. PROVIDE SMOOTH

TRANSITION PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
8 DRIVEWAY ACCESS PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES9 LID AREA PER DRAINAGE REPORT 10 PROPOSED UNDER GROUND CHAMBER LOCATION

SIZE TO BE DETERMINED PER DRAINAGE REPORT
11 RETAINING WALL
12 GRAVITY TYPE RETAINING WALL13 TRUCK DOCK REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS14 STORM DRAIN INLET 15 CONCRETE CATCH BASIN PER CITY OF PASO
ROBLES
16 (2) 36" HDPE STORM DRAIN PIPE17 CONCRETE SPANDREL PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES18 TRASH ENCLOSURE19 FIRE HYDRANT PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES 20 STORM DRAIN PIPE
XXX
15 8 8
18 19
20 20
20 4
6 6

CONFORM TO EXITING

SIDEWALK, CURB AND
GUTTER

TEMPORARY ACCESS TO PAVEMENT

CONCRETE SPILLWAY
W/ R.S.P. (816.0 FS)

TEMPORARY GRADING

EASEMENT

6.50'

2.50'

1.00'
Exhibit C

Page 237 of 356 ends

>
>
>
GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS 829.85 FF 829.30 FF 829.00 FF 828.10 FF 815
815
820
820
820
820
825
825
825
825
825 825
825
825
830 830 830 830 835 835
830
827 828 829
831
831
832
832
825
830
827
828
829
829
825
830
828
829
829
828.20 FF
827826
829
830
831
833
832
830 829828
829
829
828
827
826
830
(832.49)
(830.20)

UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL
829.05 FF
828
828
826
827
828
819
829
829
829
828 828
830
828
829
829
827
833
831
WL WL WL WL WL 814.00 BTM 820
825
830
825
825 824
2 821
1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 6+20 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+90 STA: 1+07.51STREET "A"
815
820 825
820
830
833
829
CO
825
> > > > > > > > > > > >
>
>
> > >
>

ELEVATION

ELEVATION
810820830840
810820830840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+07 FF: 828.10 FF: 828.10
ELEVATION 820 ELEVATION 830 840 820 830 840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+07 FF: 829.05 FF: 829.00

STATION
ELEVATION 820 ELEVATION 830 840 820 830 840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+07 FF: 828.20 FF: 829.30

ELEVATION

ELEVATION
810820830840
810820830840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80

ELEVATION

ELEVATION
810820830840
810820830840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80

ELEVATION

ELEVATION
810820830840
810820830840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80

ELEVATION

ELEVATION
820830840850
820830840850
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00
FF: 825.63
FF: 829.85
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

PROPOSED OVERFLOW

CHANNEL

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
50 100
(IN FEET)
25 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 50 FT
0 Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 1
1 4
5 6 7
23 Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 2
Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 3
Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 4
Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 5
Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 6
Scale: 1"= 20'
SECTION 7
BUILDING 6
BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5
BUILDING 2
BUILDING 3

ARDMORE ROAD

TRUCK DOCK AREA PROPOSED OVERFLOW

CHANNEL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL
PL

RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL

RETAINING WALL

LID BASIN
C3.3
A
C3.3
B
RW
RW
RW
Exhibit C

Page 238 of 356 ends

810
820830840
810820830840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+20 5+40 5+60 5+80 6+00 6+20 FF: 829.00 FF: 829.30
810820830840
6+20 6+40 6+60 6+80 7+00 7+20 7+40 7+60 7+80 8+00 8+20 8+40 8+60 8+80 9+00 9+20 9+40 9+60 9+80 10+00 10+20 10+40 10+60 10+80 11+00 11+20 11+40 11+60 11+80 12+00 12+20 12+40 12+50 810820830840
810820830840
0+00 0+20 0+40 0+60 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+20 5+40 5+60 5+80 6+00 6+20 FF: 828.10 FF: 829.05
810820830840
6+20 6+40 6+60 6+80 7+00 7+20 7+40 7+60 7+80 8+00 8+20 8+40 8+60 8+80 9+00 9+20 9+40 9+60 9+80 10+00 10+20 10+40 10+60 10+80 11+00 11+20 11+40 11+60 11+80 12+00 12+20 12+40 12+50 FF: 865.62
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
FILE NAME: 751-05 GRDNG-UTL.DWG Plot Date: 7/26/2023
Site Sections
C3.3
6 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
20 40
(IN FEET)
10 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 20 FT
0 Scale: Horz: 1"= 20' Vert: 1"=10'
SECTION A STA 0+00 TO 6+20
Scale: Horz: 1"= 20' Vert: 1"=10'
SECTION A STA 6+20 TO 12+50
Scale: Horz: 1"= 20' Vert: 1"=10'
SECTION B STA 0+00 TO 6+20
Scale: Horz: 1"= 20' Vert: 1"=10'
SECTION B STA 6+20 TO 12+50
BUILDING 1
BUILDING 4
BUILDING 6
BUILDING 5
BUILDING 3

60.00' RW

60.00' RW
PL
RW RW
RW RW
PL
PL
PL
EG
FG
FG
FG
FG
EG
EG
EG

LID BASIN

STACK WALL

STACK WALL
Exhibit C

Page 239 of 356 ends

>
>
>

SS SS SS SS SS SS

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

SS SS SS SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS SS
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD

SD SD SD
SD
SD

SD SD SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD

WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL CO

FIRE FIRE FIRE

FIRE FIRE

FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE

FIRE FIRE FIRE

FIRE FIRE

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL
SS

WL WL WL WL WL WL

FIRE FIRE

FIRE FIRE FIRE

FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE
SD
FIRE

FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE
FIRE
SD
SD

FIRE FIRE
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 6+20 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+90 ARDMORE RD (N-S) STA: 10+30.00 = STA: 1+07.51 STREET "A" SS SS
SS SS
SS SS

SS SS SS SS
CO
> > > > > >
>
> > > > > > > >
>
>
>
N 1°37'19" E
S 88°52'18" E
15' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT
PER 144 DEEDS 138 10' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER 82 PM 86 > > >
>

ARDMORE ROAD
(IN FEET)

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

ARDMORE ROAD
Utility Plan
C3.4
7 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
NOTE:

1. BUILDING OUTLINE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.

2. UTILITY POINT OF CONNECT AND SIZE SHALL BE VERIFIED

WITH FINAL PLUMBING PLAN PRIOR TO PLACEMENT

3. THRUST BLOCK REQUIRED ON ALL WATER LINES AT ALL

BENDS & TEES

REFERENCE KEYNOTES

DESCRIPTION
1 8" PVC WATERLINE
2 WATERLINE MANIFOLD
3 WATER METER (DOMESTIC & LANDSCAPE TBD)
4 8" FIRE LINE
5 FIRE HYDRANT6 8" SANITARY SEWER7 6" SANITARY SEWER (PRIVATE)8 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE9 SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT 10 LID AREA PER DRAINAGE REPORT
11 PROPOSED UNDER GROUND CHAMBER LOCATION

SIZE TO BE DETERMINED PER DRAINAGE REPORT
12 STORM DRAIN INLET13 CONCRETE CATCH BASIN PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
14 CONCRETE HEAD WALL W/ (2) 36" HDPE STORM

DRAIN PIPE
15 STORM DRAIN PIPE
16 STREET LIGHT17 DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY PER CITY

OF PASO ROBLES
18 ARV - AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CITY OF PASO
ROBLES
XXX
(8" PVC) (8" PVC)
(8" PVC)(12" SD)
(18" SD)
(E) FH
(GAS) (GAS)
(8" SS) (E)FH (E) 2- 24" SD
(E)FH
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
3 1
2 2 2 2 2
2 2
3 3 3
3 3
3 4
4 4
4 4
4 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 6
6 7
7 7
6 8
8 8
8 8
11 9
11 11
10 10 10 10
10 10
10 13
13 12 12
12 1212
12 12
12 12 12 12 12 12
12 12
12 12
12 12 12
12 12
12 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
15 15
14 STREET "A"
(E) LIGHT
(E) LIGHT (E) LIGHT
16 16
16 16
16 14
15 7
7 7
7 7
7 17
17 17
17 UTILITY TYPICAL LEGEND

SS SANITARY SEWER

SD STORM DRAIN

FIRE FIRE LINE

WL WATERLINE

GAS GAS

CO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
5 5
10 15
15 RELOCATED (E)FH

CONFORM TO EXITING

SIDEWALK, CURB AND
GUTTER
13 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
18 35.00'

RECIPROCAL

DRAINAGE

EASEMENT

15.00' 20.00'

10.00' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
Exhibit C

Page 240 of 356 ends

GAS
SS

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS
825
825 825
830
827 828 829
831
825
825
28 20 FF 28
827
826
SD

WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL CO
FIR
E

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
UTL

UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL
SS
828
826
827
827

4.27% 2.93% 0.51%

2.29%

2.00%

7.58%

5.88%

2.93%

1.77% 1.93%
WL
SD
SD
825
10+00 1+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+90

0.74% 0.79% 1.62% 1.08% 1.67%

ARDMORE RD (N-S)
STA: 10+30.00 =STA: 1+07.51STREET "A"

0.81%
SS
SS
SS
825
N 1°37'19" E

SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
S
S
SS
825
8 830 827 828 829831 831 832 832 830
828 829
SD SD
829
830
831
833
WL
CO
GAS
UTL
SS
830
828
829
829
827

0.50%

0.56% 0.54% 4.50%

1.77%

1.93%

0.98%

WL WL WL WL WL WL WL WL
830
00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 6+20
10+00
1 ARDMORE RD (N-S)
STA: 10+30.00 =
STA: 1+07.51
STREET "A"
833
SS

SS SS SS
>
S 88°52'18" E
800810820830840850860
800810820830840850860
10+00 10+20 10+40 10+60 10+80 11+00 11+20 11+40 11+60 11+80 12+00 12+20 12+40 12+60 12+80 13+00 13+20 13+40 13+60 13+80 14+00 14+20 14+40 14+60 14+80 15+00 15+20 15+40 15+60 15+80 16+00 16+20 16+40 16+60 16+80 17+00

5.00%

0.74%

5.00%

0.71%
STA: 10+24.01
SSMH
ELEV: 826.80
STA: 14+40.71
SSMH
ELEV: 826.25

ARDMORE RD (N-S)
STA: 10+30.00 =
STREET "A"
STA: 107.51
INV: 814.35 INV: 817.61 INV: 818.54
800810820830840850860
800810820830840850860
0+70 0+80 1+00 1+20 1+40 1+60 1+80 2+00 2+20 2+40 2+60 2+80 3+00 3+20 3+40 3+60 3+80 4+00 4+20 4+40 4+60 4+80 5+00 5+20 5+40 5+60 5+80 6+00 6+20

0.50% 12.84%

2.93%
100.00' VC
BVC: 1+04.42
ELEV: 826.46
EVC: 2+04.42
ELEV: 828.18
PVI ELEV = 827.93
PVI STA = 1+54.42
HIGH POINT ELEV = 828.18
HIGH POINT STA = 2+04.42

41.2 0.50%

5.00%

0.84%

5.00% 5.00%
STA: 1+19.97
SSMH
ELEV: 826.80
STA: 5+70.82
SSMH
ELEV: 830.00
STREET "A"
STA: 1+07.51 =

ARDMORE RD (N-S)
STA 10+30
INV: 814.35 INV: 816.79
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

GRAPHIC SCALE
Scale: HORZ.: 1"= 30' VERT.: 1"= 15'
(E) ARDMORE ROAD (N-S)PLAN VIEW STA 10+00 TO 17+00
EG @ CL
FS @ CL
EG @ CL
FL CURB FACE FG @ CL
(N) 8" SEWER
(E)12" CMP

2.2' CLR
12 SD
18" SD

REFERENCE KEYNOTES

DESCRIPTION
1 ASPHALT CONCRETE
2 CONCRETE SPANDREL PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
3 6" CONCRETE CURB & 24" GUTTER PER CITY OF

PASO ROBLES
4 6" CONCRETE CURB PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
5 CURB CUT OPENING6 SAWCUT AND MATCH POINT. PROVIDE SMOOTH

TRANSITION PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
7 DRIVEWAY ACCESS PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES8 8" PVC WATERLINE9 WATERLINE MANIFOLD 10 WATER METER (DOMESTIC & LANDSCAPE TBD)
11 8" FIRE LINE
12 FIRE HYDRANT13 8" SANITARY SEWER14 6" SANITARY SEWER (PRIVATE) 15 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PER CITY OF PASO
ROBLES
16 STORM DRAIN PIPE17 STORM DRAIN INLET18 CONCRETE CATCH BASIN PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
19 LID AREA PER DRAINAGE REPORT
20 STREET LIGHT PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
21 WOOD BARRICADE PER CITY OF PASO ROBLES
22 ARV - AIR RELEASE VALVE PER CITY OF PASO
ROBLES
XXX

30.00'
Scale: HORZ.: 1"= 30' VERT.: 1"= 15'
(E) ARDMORE ROAD (N-S) PROFILE VIEW STA 10+00 TO 17+00

ARDMORE ROAD

ARDMORE ROAD
STREET "A"

ARDMORE ROAD

ARDMORE ROAD
STREET "A"
Scale: HORZ.: 1"= 30' VERT.: 1"= 15'
STREET "A" PLAN VIEW STA 0+70 TO 6+04
Scale: HORZ.: 1"= 30' VERT.: 1"= 15'
STREET "A" PROFILE VIEW STA 0+70 TO 6+04

30.00' 30.00'

60.00' 10.00'
PUE

10.00'
PUE
R/WR/W
R/W

10.00'
PUE
CL

FUTURE JOINT

DRIVEWAY ACCESS

FUTURE JOINT

DRIVEWAY
ACCESS
R25.00' R25.00'
R25.00' R25.00'
R25.00'
(N) 8" SEWER
(N) 8" WATER

3.5' CLR

1.75' CLR

CONFORM

UTILITY TYPICAL LEGEND

SS SANITARY SEWER

SD STORM DRAIN

FIRE FIRE LINE

WL WATERLINE

GAS GAS

CO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT

FL CURB FACE
(E)FH (E)FH
1 2
2 2
2 3
3 3
3 3
5 5
5 5 5
6 6
6 7 7
7 11
8 8
10 9
10 9
10 9
10 9
10 9
10 9
10 9
10 9
12 12
12 7
13 13
13 13
14 14
14 15 15 15
1 11
11 11
15 15
16 16
16 16
16 17 17 17
17 17
18 18
18 19 19 19
19 19 19
20 20
20 20
20 21
(E)LIGHT
(E)LIGHT(E)LIGHT
(E)LIGHT
(E)LIGHT
(E)FH
TO BE

RELOCATED
(E)FH
TO BE

RELOCATED

POC EXISTING
SEWER

20.00' 5.00'

60.00' R/W
30'±
(E)SIDEWALK

5.50' 4.50'
LID

60.00' R/W

5.50' 4.50'
LID

5.50'
LID

4.50' 20.00' 20.00'
10'±
SW
SW SW
(SW)
CL
CL
Scale: NTS

TYPICAL STREET SECTION (ARDMORE)
Scale: NTS

TYPICAL STREET SECTION (FUTURE RAOD A)
40'

40.00'

10.00'

OFFER PER PIP
FOR PM PR 180067
PUE

10.00'
PUE

TEMPORARY

ACCESS TO

PAVEMENT
22 Exhibit C

Page 241 of 356 ends

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS 829.85 FF 829.30 FF 829.00 FF 828.10 FF 815
815
820
820
820
820
825 825
825
825
825
825
825
825
830
830
830
830
835
835
830
827 828 829
831
831
832
832
825
830
827
828
829
829
825
830
828
829
829
SD
SD SD
SD SD
SD
SD
SD

SD SD SD
SD SD

SD SD SD
SD SD
SD
828.20 FF
827826
829
830
831
833
832
830
829
828
829
829
828
827
826
830
1 2
3 5
829.05 FF
828
828
826
827
828
819
829
829
829
828
828
830
828 829
829
827
833
831

WL WL WL WL WL
SD
814.00 BTM
SD
823
820 821
822
824
820
825
830
825
825
824
822
821
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 6+20 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 16+90 ARDMORE RD (N-S) STA: 10+30.00 = STA: 1+07.51 STREET "A" 815
820
825
820
830
833
829
CO
825
NTS

STAGING AREA DETAIL
Project Information:

RISK LEVEL: tbd
Legally Responsible Person(LRP):

Owner: Damien Mavis Covelop PO Box 12910 San Luis Obispo, CA 93406 Prepared by:

WALLACE GROUP
QSD/QSP: Ronald (Glenn) Rider, QSD/QSP #26736
Phone: 805-544-4011Email: [email protected]
WDID No.: tbd Risk Level tbd.

LEGEND:

DESCRIPTION

STORMDRAIN INLET PROTECTION

FIBER ROLLS

TEMPORARY EXCLUSIONARY FENCING FOR

ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS
FR
PEV

GRAVEL BAG CHECK DAM

SF SILT FENCE
REFERENCE NOTES:
200 WATER POLLUTION AND EROSION

CONTROL MEASURES
201 FIBER ROLLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS STANDARD T56. ALL

PERIMETER CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO BEGINNING GRADING ACTIVITIES. FIBER ROLLS SHALL BE MADE OF 100%
BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALS.
202 INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING TO PROTECT EXISTING TREES AND PLANTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CASQA STANDARD EC-2. 203 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS STANDARD T58.
204 TEMPORARY DRAINAGE INLET PROTECTION TYPE 3A - GRAVEL BAG BERM PER CALTRANS BMP SC-10 AND T62
205 CONCRETE WASH OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS STANDARD T59. 206 SILT FENCING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS STANDARD T51.207 PROPOSED STAGING AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DRIP PANS, BMPs, AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR FUELING CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES. SEE STAGING ARE DETAIL THIS SHEET
208 GRAVEL BAG CHECK DAM IN CHEVRON FORMATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS STANDARD T57.
209 INSTALL FILTER FABRIC INSERT BELOW EXISTING GRADE FOR DI'S IN CONCRETE.

Erosion Control Notes

PRE-CONSTRUCTION

1. THE PROJECT QSP MUST ATTEND THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. THE PROJECT SWPPP MUST BE ON THE SITE AND THE EROSION CONTROL SITEPLAN SHALL BE REVIEWED AT THIS MEETING.

2. PRIOR TO ANY SITE WORK, INSTALL THE CONSTRUCTION SITE-RESOURCE

PROTECTION FENCING AS SHOWN ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND

ENSURE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MATERIALS ARE ON SITE AND READY FOR INSTALLATION.

3. INSTALL ORANGE PLASTIC-WEB FENCING ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION SITE

BOUNDARY AND IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON PLAN PRIOR TO ANY SITE DISTURBANCE. NO CONSTRUCTION UNDER THIS PERMIT IS TO OCCUR OUTSIDE OF THE SITE BOUNDARY.

DURING CONSTRUCTION

1. DURING CONSTRUCTION PROTECTION MEASURES INCLUDE BMPS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE ACCESSED ONLY VIA THE PROJECT ENTRANCE OFF OF THE MAIN PAVED PUBLIC ROAD. CONTRACTOR

SHALL PREVENT MULTIPLE CONSTRUCTION ACCESS POINTS DIRECTING

ACCESS TO A SINGLE POINT THROUGH THE USE OF FENCING OR OTHER OBSTACLES.

2. CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE SITE BOUNDARY AND ONLY AND PER THE DESIGNATED AREA ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. THE

CONTRACTOR CAN CHANGE THE LOCATION AFTER REVIEW AND APPROVAL

WITH THE QSP TO ENSURE THE NEW LOCATION COMPLIES WITH ALL COUNTY AND STATE CODES. (MUST BE 100' FROM SENSITIVE RESOURCES AND DRAINAGE WATER COURSES).

3. ALL PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE LOCATED MORE THAN 50' FROM ANY STORM DRAIN INLET OR DRAINAGE.

SLOPE PROTECTION: PROTECT ALL GRADED CUT AND FILL SLOPES WITHIN 14

DAYS OF INITIAL GRADING PER PROJECT PLANS AND AS FOLLOWS FOR ANY FIELD CHANGES:

Install fiber rolls on slopes along the contour with a slight downward angle at the end of each row to prevent ponding at the midsection (California Straw Works, 2005). Turn the ends of each fiber roll upslope to prevent runoff from flowing around the roll.

Install fiber rolls in shallow trenches dug 3 to 5 inches deep for soft, loamy soils and 2 to 3 inches deep for hard, rocky soils. Determine the vertical spacing for slope installations on thebasis of the slope gradient and soil type.

FIBER ROLL SLOPE PLACEMENT
1:1 slopes = 10 feet apart
2:1 slopes = 20 feet apart
3:1 slopes = 30 feet apart
4:1 slopes = 40 feet apart
For soft, loamy soils, place the rows closer together. For hard, rocky soils, place the rows farther apart. Stake fiber rolls securely into the ground and orient them perpendicular to the slope. Biodegradable wood stakes or willow cuttings are recommended. Drive the stakes (24-inch stake is recommended for use on soft, loamy soils. An 18-inch stake is recommended for use on hard, rocky soil) through the middle of the fiber roll and deep enough into the ground to anchor the roll in place. About 3 to 5 inches of the stake should stick out above the roll, and the stakes should be spaced 3 to 4 feet apart.2. STABILIZE ALL GRADED SLOPES AFTER 14 DAYS OF INACTIVITY. VEGETATE SLOPES BY EITHER:
a. HYDROSEED AND PROVIDE TEMPORARY IRRIGATION UNTIL
ESTABLISHED; OR
b. DRY SEED AND COVER WITH WEED FREE STRAW, TRACKED UP AND DOWN SLOPE TO TACK INTO THE SOIL (USING TRACKED CONSTRUCTIONEQUIPMENT Or, c. PLACE JUTE NETTING OR EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS ON ALL GRADED SLOPES THAT DO NOT HAVE ESTABLISHED VEGETATION BY SEPTEMBER 1.

POST CONSTRUCTION

1. AT PROJECT COMPLETION, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S NOT INTENDED

TO BE LEFT IN PLACE (JUTE AND SEEDING)

2. OBTAIN FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS (70% VEGETATIVE COVER)

3. INSTALL ALL DRAINAGE FEATURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SWCP

4. NOTIFY QSD TO REVIEW FOR SITE COMPLETION THEY WILL FILE AND OBTAIN APPROVAL OF A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) FOR THE PROJECT SWPPP.

5. CONSTRUCTION OF ALL STORM WATER CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE

COMPLETED PRIOR TO INSPECTION BY COUNTY AND PRIOR TO ENGINEER OF RECORD FINAL SIGN-OFF.

SWPPP

1. A NOTICE OF INTENT HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD BY THE OWNER SO THAT THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MAY BE COVERED UNDER THE STATE GENERAL PERMIT.

2. THE WDID IDENTIFICATION FOR THE PROJECT STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) IS ----__TBD__.

3. THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND

MADE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST OF A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY BOARD AND/OR THE LOCAL AGENCY.

4. A CALIFORNIA STATE CERTIFIED QSP MUST INSPECT THE SITE ACCORDING TO

THE STATE ISSUED SWPPP REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DURATION OF THE

PROJECT
County Erosion Control Notes

1. Erosion control measures for wind, water, material stockpiles, and tracking shall be implemented on all projects at all times and shall include source control, includingprotection of stockpiles, protection of slopes, protection of all disturbed areas, protection of accesses, and perimeter containment measures. Erosion control shall be placed prior to the commencement of grading and site disturbance activities unless the Public Works Department determines temporary measures to be unnecessary based upon location, site characteristics or time of year. The intent of erosion control measures shall be to keep all generated sediments from entering a swale, drainage way, watercourse, atmosphere, or migrate onto adjacent properties or onto the public right-of-way.

2. Site inspections and appropriate maintenance of all erosion control measures/devices shall be conducted and documented at all times during construction and especially prior to, during, and after rain events.

3. The Developer shall be responsible for the placement and maintenance of all erosion control measures/devices as specified by the approved plan until such time that the project is accepted as complete by the Public Works Department or until released from the Conditions of Approval of their General Permit. Erosion control measures/devices may be relocated, deleted or additional measures/devices may be required depending on the actual conditions encountered during construction. Additional erosion control measures/devices shall be placed at the discretion of the Engineer of Work, County Inspector, SWPPP Monitor, or RWQCB Inspector. Guidelines for determining appropriate erosion control devices shall be included in the plans with additional measures/devices noted from the appendix of the Public Improvement Standards.

4. Installation of erosion control measures and devices shall be implemented "year-round".

5. The Contractor, Developer, and Engineer of Work shall be responsible to review the project site prior to October 15 (rainy season) and to coordinate an implementation plan for wet weather erosion control devices. A locally based standby crew for emergency work shall be available at all times during the rainy season (October 15 through April 15). Necessarymaterials shall be available and stock piled at convenient locations to facilitate rapid construction or maintenance of temporary devices when rain is imminent.6. In the event of a failure, the Developer and/or his representative shall be responsible forcleanup and all associated costs or damage. In the event that damage occurs within the right-of-way and the County is required to perform cleanup, the owner shall be responsible for County reimbursement of all associated costs or damage.

7. In the event of failure and/or lack of performance by the owner and/or contractor to correct erosion control related problems the Public Works Department may revoke all active permits and recommend that County Code Enforcement provide a written notice or stop work order in accordance with Section 22.52.140 [23.10] of the Land Use Ordinance.

8. Permanent erosion control shall be placed and established with 90% coverage on all disturbed surfaces other than paved or gravel surfaces, prior to final inspection.

Permanent erosion control shall be fully established prior to final acceptance. Temporary erosion control measures shall remain in place until permanent measures are established.

9. The County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) may have additional project specific erosion control requirements. The Contractor, Developer, and Engineer of Work shall be responsible for maintaining self-regulation of these requirements.

10. All projects involving site disturbance of one acre or greater shall comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The Developer shall submit a Notice of intent (NOI) to comply with the General Permit for Construction Activity with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The Developer shall provide the County with the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID #) or with verification that an exemption has been granted by RWQCB. WDID No.: .

Person to contact 24 hours a day in the event there is an erosion control/sedimentation problem (Storm Water Compliance Officer): Name Local Phone No:

Dust Control Notes:

1. Reduce the amount of the disturbed area where possible

2. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems in sufficient quantities to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency would be required whenever wind speeds exceed 15 mph. Reclaimed (nonpotable) water should be used whenever possible.

3. All dirt stock-pile areas must be sprayed as needed.

4. Permanent dust control measures identified in the approved project plans should be implemented as soon as possible following completion of any soil disturbing activities.

5. Exposed ground areas that are planned to be reworked at dates greater than one month after initial grading should be sown with a fast-germinating native grass seed and watered until vegetation is established.

6. All disturbed areas not subject to revegetation should be stabilized using approved chemical soil binders, jute netting or other methods approved in advance by the APCD.

7. All roadways should be paved as soon as possible.

8. Vehicle speed for all construction vehicles shall not exceed 15 mph on any unpaved surface at the construction site.

9. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least two feet of freeboard (minimum vertical distance between top of load and top of trailer) in accordance with CVC Section 23114.

10. All areas disturbed by grading activities shall be hydroseeded with an approved hydroseed mix.

11. Effective soil cover shall be implemented for areas scheduled to be inactive for at least 14 days.

FILE NAME: 751-05 ECP.DWG
Erosion Control Plan
C4.1
9 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
ECP SHOWN ON THIS SHEET IS FORPHASE 1
Construction Staging,
Storage & Stockpile
Area
Perimeter to be contained with
fiber rolls, weighted with
sandbags every 10'.

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR FR
Concrete/Paint
Washout
Construction Trash
Recycling: Covered at
all times, no overflows;
watertight
Construction
Trailer Area
Fuel Storage/haz mat
area w/secondary
containment
Construction
Equipment
Parking, Drip
Pans Required
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3

ARDMORE ROAD
50 100
(IN FEET)
25 GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 50 FT
0 ARDMORE ROAD

FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR

FR FR FR FR FR
PHASE - 2
Construction Staging,
Storage & Stockpile
Area
Perimeter to be contained with
fiber rolls, weighted with
sandbags every 10'.

SF SF SF
FR
FR

FR FR FR FR FR FR FR
PEV
PEV
PEV
PEV
PEV
PEV
PEV
PEV
PEV

PHASING LINE

PHASING LINE
SF SF
FR FR
FR

FR FR FR
FR
Exhibit C

Page 242 of 356 ends

NTS
CALTRANS TR-0400
FILE NAME: 751-05 ECP.DWG
Erosion Control Details
C4.2
10 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
Exhibit C

Page 243 of 356 ends

FILE NAME: 751-05 ECP.DWG
Erosion Control Details
C4.3
11 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
Exhibit C

Page 244 of 356 ends

FILE NAME: 751-05 ECP.DWG
Erosion Control Details
C4.4
12 Ardmore Industrial
Developement Plans
10 7/26/230751-05CDCD
SHEETS
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES DESIGNERS:

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

Copyright © 2023 Wallace Group, a California
Corporation. All rights reserved. Copies of this
drawing shall have this notice.
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
C
D
B
A
0 1 2 3
Exhibit C

Page 245 of 356 ends

1343 Bishop Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Tel: 805 234 8760 Email: [email protected] August 17, 2022 To: Michael Stoltey – MD3 Investments & Damien Mavis – CoVelop Re: Oak Tree Assessment report for Ardmore Road Project, 2930 Union Rd, Paso Robles, CA 93446 Gentlemen,
In response to your request for an Oak Tree Assessment for trees growing on a lot you intend to purchase and develop at 2930 Union Road, I have produced the following report.

Assignment
• Collect tree data and perform Level 2 inspection on 9 valley oaks (Quercus lobata) to determine condition and suitability for retention.
• Perform advanced Level 3 Assessment with Resistograph for 3 valley oaks. • Provide written summary of condition and suitability for retention for all 9 valley oaks.

Introduction
On August 2, 2022, I visited the site and performed a Level 2, basic assessment on all native oaks 6-inch diameter and greater on lots you intend to develop. As a result, 3 of the trees required a Level 3 advanced inspection with a Resistograph, wood density measuring device. I returned to the site on August 5, 2022, and performed the advanced inspections with a Resistograph to measure wood density.

On August 12, 2022, I collected additional data for tree #2 via a climbing inspection. I analyzed data collected during the advanced inspections and have made recommendations regarding tree condition, tree risk and potential for retention. All tree inspections were based on the potential for a tree to fail within the next 5 years from the date of this report. Any tree retained should be re-inspected on an annual basis to determine health and structural integrity status.

MethodologyMy initial level 2 inspection consisted of a ground based, visual inspection and full walk around of the tree. I used a rubber mallet to sound the trunk to detect decay. I tagged each tree with an aluminum tag and assigned it a number. Based on a previous arborist’s inspection of the trees, I assigned the same number that was listed in their report so we would have consistency when referencing the trees.

Advanced inspections consisted of Resistograph wood density testing, and in one instance, an aerial inspection that consisted of determining the extent of decay with a tape measure.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 246 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
2 Tree Condition Ratings
All trees in the inventory were given a condition rating. The rating was based on the health, structure and presence of disease and insects. See the following definitions:
• Dead = Severely declining or no foliage, large dead branches, decay cavities, loss of bark, roots decayed or dead.
• Very Poor = Evidence of multiple large past failures, advanced decay, uncontrollable pest infestations or disease infection. Tree in severe decline. • Poor = Tree may be suppressed, drought stressed, or had at least 1 large branch failure.

Disease or pest infestations may be present. Can potentially be retained with attention to mitigation pruning, cultural care changes, pest and disease control. • Fair = May have had minor past failures. Some pests or structural defects may be present, small deadwood. Minor to moderate drought stress present. Defects may be mitigated with pruning and pests can be controlled.
• Good = A relatively healthy tree with minor to no structural defects with minimal to no pest observed. Defects can be mitigated with pruning and pests can be controlled. • Very Good = Trees that have had professional arboricultural care. No structural defects, disease or pests identified.
• Excellent = Specimen tree with superior form, root structure and health. Tree has been regularly cared for by professional arborists over its lifetime, E.g., estate or arboretum tree.

Inspection Levels
Level 1 – Limited Visual Inspection – This is a limited walk-by or drive-by, which does not typically include a complete walk around a tree. The inspection focuses on obvious defects, imminent or probable likelihood of failures. There are generally no tools used at this level. This is the fastest and least thorough assessment.

Level 2 – Basic Assessment – Generally includes a complete walk around inspection. Basic tools such as probes, measuring devices, binoculars, mallet or magnifying glass are used. At this level, an aerial inspection is not included. A Level 2 assessment is usually necessary to establish the need for a Level 3 assessment.

Level 3 – Advanced Inspection – Detailed inspection which usually employs the use of special equipment, data collection and analysis. A higher level of training is also required, such as International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Tree Risk Assessment Qualification. Specialized equipment may include an Air Spade (device that uses compressed air to expose roots or root crown for inspections without causing damage to sensitive plant tissues). Resistograph (drilling devise used to measure and graph wood density) Level 3 inspections may also include sending samples to labs for analysis. A Level 3 inspections will usually take place later because of time needed to perform a Level 2 inspection.

Assessing Tree Structure and Potential to Fail
Estimating the structural integrity of trees is a challenge because, unlike steel I-beams or other construction materials there is no precise engineering standard to help determine the load a tree can withstand.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 247 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
3 Arborists must use measurement of decay, experience with previous, similar trees as well as factor in the various stressors on the compromised areas within the tree. Trees with thicker outer shells are going to be stronger. Oval internal decay areas and areas of decay that have broken through the outer shell of the trunk or branch will be weaker due to the inconsistency of the cylinder.

Tree Risk
Tree risk is determined by identifying the targets e.g. (people, buildings, cars or property) that could be injured or damaged by a whole or partial tree failure, the occupancy rate, exposure of the target to the tree hazard, the size of part of the tree that may impact the target if it were to fail, the likelihood of impact on the target, and the consequences of failure on the target.

The part of the tree most likely to fail and cause the largest impact is used to determine the highest overall risk for the tree.

When considering likelihood of failure, the definitions are as follows:
• Imminent – Failure has started or most likely to occur in the near future. Even if there is no significant wind or increased load. The imminent category overrides the time frame stated in the scope of work.
• Probable – Failure may be expected under normal weather conditions within the specified time frame.
• Possible – Failure may be expected in extreme weather conditions, but is unlikely during normal weather conditions during a specified time frame. • Improbable – The tree or part is not likely to fail during normal weather conditions and may not fail in extreme weather conditions within the specified time frame.

Risk Matrices
I used the International Society of Arboriculture’s Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form to determine risk. Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” determines the likelihood of failure and impact. The result is entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” which factors in Consequences of Failure to get the overall risk rating. In the example below, Likelihood of failure of a part was Probable. The Likelihood of Impact was High. The result was Likely. In Matrix 2, I entered the result of Likely and entered Severe in the Consequences of Failure which gave me a risk rating of High.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 248 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
4 For each tree requiring a level 3 inspection, I have highlighted matrix tables to show how risk was determined for the part or parts of the tree being considered regarding failure potential.

Mitigation
When assessing risk for a tree, it is important to determine if the risk of tree failure can be reduced through mitigation. Mitigation can be made through pruning, installing cabling or bracing support structures. Moving targets out of the strike zone of a tree or restricting access to a tree are also viable mitigation measures. The recommended mitigation should not be so excessive that they compromise the health of the tree.

Tree Assessments
I performed level 2 assessments on trees 1,2,3,4,9,10,11 & 13. See Tree Map Appendix B. From those assessments, I determined that trees 1,2 and 13 required level 3 advanced inspections. Each assessment below includes a condition rating as well as potential for retention and mitigation recommendations. For level 3 inspections, I included a tree risk assessment matrix.

Tree 1 – A 43” diameter valley oak was in Very Poor condition. See Appendix A - Photographs - Photo 1
Basic Level 2 Inspection –
This tree had drought stress which was indicated by dead wood in the canopy. It also had decay throughout its scaffold branches which was indicated by decay cavities and woodpecker nests excavated in dead wood. See Appendix A - Photographs - Photos 1 & 4.

The trunk had an approximate lean to the east of 10 degrees. It also had a horizontal compression bulge on the east side of its trunk approximately 1’ above ground. Compression bulges or wrinkles, indicate that wood fibers are being crushed by the weight of the canopy and trunk due to lack of supportive structure in the trunk. Further the tree had a large, decayed, anchor root on its southwest side. The root was on the opposing side of the lean of the tree and is likely to fail as decay advances and stress from the weight of the canopy continues to build.

See Appendix A -Photographs - Photos 1-3.

Although this tree had a full canopy it has significant trunk decay. When I sounded the trunk with a rubber mallet, it resounded hollow on all sides. To further confirm the sounding results, I performed an advanced inspection of the decay using a Resistograph.

Advanced Level 3 Inspection -
I took 4 measurements of the wood density of the trunk at 3.5’ above ground. o Sample 1 – west side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 4” o Sample 2 – south side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 6” o Sample 3 – east side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 4” with a small 1.25” pocket of sound wood at 8” laterally, then total decay

EXHIBIT - D

Page 249 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
5 o Sample 4 – north side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 5.25” Based on the Resistograph results, it was apparent that interior wood of the trunk is significantly decayed. The evidence of compression bulges showed that the trunk is losing structural integrity and leaning due to lack of supportive wood fibers.

Armillaria mellea, a.k.a. Oak root fungus is a common disease in valley oaks and is likely the cause of the decay in the roots and the trunk. Christopher J. Luley in his guide Wood Decay Fungi calls this fungus Number one of the “Big Three” of the important decay fungi. Again, according to Mr. Luley, “Armillaria is a root and butt rot fungus that increases the risk of tree failure and is a pathogen capable of killing cambium of roots and lower trunk of stressed trees”.

See Appendix A - Photographs - Photos 29 & 30 for example of failed oak due to root and butt rot.

Parts Assessed – Roots and Trunk
I used the International Society of Arboriculture’s Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form to determine risk for this tree. In Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” I selected Likelihood of Failure of the roots and trunk as Probable. The Likelihood of impacting a target in a built environment would be High. The resulting Likelihood of Impact was Likely, which I entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” in the Likelihood of Failure and Impact section. For the Consequences of Failure section of Matrix 2, I entered Severe. The Likelihood of Failure and Impact rating combined with the Consequences of Failure resulted in a risk rating of High.

Part Assessed – Scaffold Branches
In Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” I selected Likelihood of Failure of the scaffold branches as Probable. The Likelihood of impacting a target in a built environment would be High. The resulting Likelihood of Impact was Likely, which I entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” for the Likelihood of Failure and Impact section. Under Consequences of Failure in Matrix 2, I entered Severe. The Likelihood of Failure and Impact rating combined with the Consequences of Failure resulted in a risk rating of High.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 250 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
6 Combined Inspection Results and Risk Assessment
The highest risk rating for this tree was High and was associated with root and trunk failure. I found decay in one anchor root and significant decay was detected in the trunk. Buckling of trunk fibers was evident. Based on shell strength measurements, the likelihood of trunk failure was probable, due to lack of structural integrity. Root failure was Probable due to significant decay in the anchor root on the southwest side of the tree. Scaffold failure was also probable with a high likelihood of failure.

Mitigation:

Scaffolds - Reducing the canopy through end weight reduction and removing decayed branches 2” diameter and larger would relieve some stress on remaining scaffold branches and reduce their risk to Moderate.

Roots and Trunk - Reducing the canopy through end weight reduction would relieve some stress on the trunk but not enough to offset the overall stress being exerted on the buckling area on the north side of the tree. No structural support or bracing will help the stability of the tree’s trunk or roots. Significant decay has been detected in the roots as well as the trunk. Based on shell strength measurements, lean of the tree and buckling of wood fibers on the east side of the trunk made failure likely due to lack of structural integrity. I recommend removing the tree before commencement of construction.

Tree 2 – A 47” diameter valley oak was in Poor condition. See Appendix A - Photographs - Photo 5.

Basic Level 2 Inspection –
On the south side of the trunk there was a decay cavity originating at the root-crown and extending approximately 5.5’ upward. When sounded with a rubber mallet on either side of the cavity, it resounded hollow. Moving around the trunk to the east side, I detected another hollow sounding area with my mallet at approximately 3.5’ above ground. See Appendix A - Photographs - Photo 6. Like Tree 1, I suspect Armillaria mellea - Oak root fungus, is the cause of the rot.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 251 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
7 At approximately 8 feet above ground, on the southwest side of the trunk there was another decay area that was almost closed over with scar tissue. Although almost closed, I suspected a large area of decay behind the scar. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photo 7. There was a large scaffold branch attached to the trunk above the scar. It had a desiccated fungal fruiting body growing on it and cankers had killed strips of bark near the fungus. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photo 8. I identified the fungi genus to be that of Inonotus. Jessie A. Glaeser and Kevin T. Smith in the winter 2010 issue of Western Arborist, note this fungus to cause a whiterot of heartwood in the trunk of living oaks and also decays strips or sections of sapwood, forming elongate cankers and killing the cambium. According to Swiecki, T. J.; Bernhardt, E. A. 2006, A Field Guide to Insects and Diseases of California Oaks, “Inonotus dryophilus is one of the most serious pathogens of living oaks in California associated with decline, failure, and mortality”. In this tree, the combined weakened trunk area at the scar combined with the heavy, decayed scaffold branch make this section of the tree likely to fail.

In the upper canopy at approximately 14’ above ground there was another decay cavity in the center of the canopy, where a large scaffold branch had failed many years ago. I suspected advanced decay in the trunk at this location. See Appendix A - Photographs - Photo 9 Advanced Level 3 Inspection -
During the aerial inspection, it was discovered that the opening of the decayed scaffold in the upper canopy was 13” in diameter. The depth of the cavity was 13’2” deep. When the distance to the ground from the outside of the cavity was measured, it was 14’3”, which illustrated that the entire trunk of the tree was hollow. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photos 9 -14.

From the cavity opening, the decay continued upward into the scaffold branch growing east.

This scaffold is very likely to fail due to weak trunk structure. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photo 12.

Based on the decay detected during mallet sounding, I wanted to investigate the extent of the decay further. I performed an advanced inspection for decay using a Resistograph. I took 6 measurements of the wood density of the trunk at 3.5’ above ground unless otherwise indicated.
o Sample 1 – west side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 8” o Sample 2 – south side of tree, 1’ west of decay cavity, outer shell thickness was 8.5” o Sample 3 – south side of tree at decay cavity seam, outer shell thickness was 3” at 3’ above ground.
o Sample 4 – south side of tree, 1’ east of decay cavity, outer shell thickness was 7.25” o Sample 5 – east side of tree, outer shell thickness was 5.5” o Sample 6 – north side of tree, outer shell thickness was 12” I have highlighted the tables below to show how risk was determined for the part or parts of the tree that was being considered regarding failure potential.

I used the International Society of Arboriculture’s Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form to determine risk for this tree.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 252 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
8 Part Assessed - Trunk
In Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” I selected Likelihood of Failure of the trunk as Probable.

The Likelihood of impacting a target in a built environment would be High. The resulting Likelihood of Impact was Likely, which I entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” in the Likelihood of Failure and Impact section. Under Consequences of Failure in Matrix 2, I entered Severe. The Likelihood of the Failure and Impact rating combined with the Consequences of Failure resulted in a risk rating of High.

Combined Inspection Results and Risk AssessmentThe highest risk rating for this tree was High and was associated with trunk and scaffold branch failure. Significant decay was detected in the trunk and eastern scaffold branch.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 253 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
9 Based on shell strength measurements, and the void caused by decay on the south side of the tree, the trunk is likely to fail due to lack of structural integrity. In regard to the eastern scaffold branch and other decayed branches, they could be removed, and end-weight could be reduced to relieve some stress on remaining scaffold branches. However, the reduction of the canopy would be close to 50% and would compromise the health of the tree. Further, since the trunk is not structurally sound, this negates the mitigation measure.

Mitigation: Remove tree before commencement of construction. No structural support or bracing will help the stability of the tree’s trunk.

Tree 3 – A 47” diameter valley oak was in Very Poor condition. When I sounded the trunk with a rubber mallet, it resounded hollow on the southwest side. A large wound left by a scaffold branch failure in the crown of the tree has since decayed and left a 3’x 4’ hollow at approximately 14’ above ground on the east side of tree. Another decay cavity on the north side of the tree at the same height as the previous, measured approximately 2’ in diameter.

Remaining scaffold was overextended and attached to the decaying trunk. The remaining parts of this tree have a high likelihood of failure. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photos 15 & 16.

Mitigation: Remove tree before commencing project.
• Tree 4 – A 52” diameter valley oak was in Very Poor condition. The tree was growing off-site but had critical root zone (CRZ) and crown encroachments into your proposed construction area.

This tree has had several large scaffold branch failures. At the failure points, significant decay was visible. The remaining scaffolds were overextended and potentially had similar internal decay and had a high likelihood of failure. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photo 17.

Mitigation: I highly recommend removal of this tree due to the advancement of decay in the scaffold branches which is compromising their structural integrity. Crown reduction needed to reduce the risk of scaffold branches failing would take up to 50% of the live canopy and jeopardize the tree’s health. Because this tree is off site, you will need to coordinate with the owner regarding removal.

At minimum this tree should have all overextended branches reduced to help prevent further failures and protect any buildings or other targets you may place on your property within striking distance of the tree. If the owner of the tree chooses to retain it, you will need to design buildings, service and loading zones outside of the CRZ. • Tree 9 – A 51” diameter valley oak was in Very Poor condition. Multiple large scaffold branches had failed. Extensive decay was present at branch failure points. Only 2 overextended scaffold branches remain, and they are connected to a decaying trunk.

When I sounded the trunk with a rubber mallet, it resounded hollow. A 3’ long by 10” wide decay cavity was on the northeast side of trunk. This tree has a high risk of complete failure. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photos 18 & 19.

Mitigation: Remove tree before commencing project.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 254 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
10 • Tree 10 – A 51” diameter valley oak was in Good condition. The trunk of the tree resounded solid when sounded with a rubber mallet. Tree form was good, but there was some large dead wood and decaying scaffolds. This tree can be retained, but it should have maintenance pruning performed prior to commencement of your project. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photos 20 & 21.

Mitigation: Reduce end-weight on overextended branches. Remove dead wood 2” diameter and larger. Remove decayed and structurally unsound scaffold branches. • Tree 11 – A 30” diameter valley oak was in Very Poor condition. The tree was in severe decline due to drought stress and root disease. Many of the smaller branches had died. I detected decay at the root crown on the southwest side of the tree. I found an ant nest at the root-crown decay area indicating ants are excavating and nesting in dead roots and root crown.

The dead roots contribute to the decline of the canopy and compromise the stability of the tree.

At least five, 12” average diameter scaffolds had extensive decay on the east side of the tree. To reduce scaffold failure risk, up to 50% of the live canopy would need to be removed, which would compromise the health of and already unhealthy tree. See Appendix A - Photographs – Photos 22-24.

Mitigation: Remove tree prior do commencement of project. • Tree 13 – A 42” diameter valley oak was in Poor condition.

Basic Level 2 Inspection –
The tree had a full canopy with a balanced form. On the south side of the tree at the root crown, there was an area of decay in the underside of one of the anchor roots. Like trees 1 and 2, the decay is likely caused by Armillaria mellea. I also noted the lower trunk was bulging and larger than normal which may indicate butt-rot caused by A. mellea. Further, I observed that the eastern scaffold branch was decayed, and large dead wood was present throughout the canopy.

See Appendix A - Photographs – Photos 25 - 28.

A previous report, by another arborist, expressed concern that a scar at the base of the tree might indicate decay and structural instability. When I sounded the tree’s trunk with a rubber mallet, it resounded solid, except on the north side of the trunk. Due to the difference of opinion regarding the structural integrity of the trunk, I performed an advanced inspection for decay using a Resistograph.

Advanced Level 3 Inspection -
I took 5 measurements of the wood density of the trunk at 3.5’ above ground. o Sample 1 – west side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 7” o Sample 2 – south side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 8.5” o Sample 3 – east side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 8.5” o Sample 4 – east side of tree scarred area on east side of trunk approximately 1’ above ground. Outer shell thickness was 12”.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 255 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
11 o Sample 5 – north side of tree. Outer shell thickness was 5” Like Tree 1, the trunk of this tree had advanced internal decay, however when comparing outer shell thickness, this specimen had thicker walls and did not have indications of trunk fibers buckling, therefore its structural integrity is likely stronger.

Tree Risk - I used the International Society of Arboriculture’s Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form to determine the risk. I used Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” on the form and entered the result into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” to get the overall risk rating.

I have highlighted the tables below to show how risk was determined for the part or parts of the tree that was being considered regarding failure potential.

Part Assessed - Root
In Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” I selected Likelihood of Failure of the roots as Possible.

The Likelihood of impacting a target in a built environment would be High. The resulting Likelihood of Impact was Somewhat Likely, which I entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” for the Likelihood of Failure and Impact section. Under Consequences of Failure in Matrix 2, I entered Severe. The Likelihood of Failure and Impact rating combined with the Consequences of Failure resulted in a risk rating of Moderate.

Part Assessed – Trunk
In Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” I selected Likelihood of Failure of the scaffold branches as Probable. The Likelihood of impacting a target in a built environment would be High. The resulting Likelihood of Impact was Likely, which I entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” for the Likelihood of Failure and Impact section. Under Consequences of Failure in Matrix 2, I entered Severe. The Likelihood of Failure and Impact rating combined with the Consequences of Failure resulted in a risk rating of High.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 256 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
12 Part Assessed – Scaffold Branches
In Matrix 1 the “Likelihood Matrix” I selected Likelihood of Failure of the scaffold branches as Probable. The Likelihood of impacting a target in a built environment would be High. The resulting Likelihood of Impact was Likely, which I entered into Matrix 2, the “Risk Rating Matrix” for the Likelihood of Failure and Impact section. Under Consequences of Failure in Matrix 2, I entered Severe. The Likelihood of Failure and Impact rating combined with the Consequences of Failure resulted in a risk rating of High.

Combined Inspections Results and Risk AssessmentThe highest risk rating for this tree was High and was associated with scaffold and trunk failure. I found decay in one anchor root and significant decay was detected in the trunk, however no bulging of trunk fibers was evident. Based on shell strength measurements, the likelihood of trunk failure is probable due to lack of structural integrity. Scaffold failure was also probable.

Risk of root failure remained moderate.

Mitigation:

Mitigations are meant to reduce risk without compromising the health of the tree. Ultimately, the tree manager, owner or other controlling entity must decide if the residual risk assessed is reasonable.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 257 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
13 Scaffolds - Reducing the canopy through end weight reduction and removing decayed and branches 2” diameter and larger will relieve some stress on remaining scaffold branches and reduce their risk to Moderate.

Roots - Reducing the canopy through end weight reduction will relieve some stress on roots, however due to the overall weight of the canopy and stem, the risk rating for root failure will remain Moderate.

Trunk - Canopy reduction will relieve some stress on the trunk of the tree, however it will not likely be enough to lower trunk failure risk to moderate. If this tree is to be retained, and the goal is to reduce the risk rating, the only reasonable way to achieve that goal will be to restrict access by installing a permanent fence around it. The fence shall be a minimum of 4.5’ tall and be set at least to the edge of the canopy dripline. Once access is restricted, the risk rating will be Moderate.

Respectfully Submitted,
Rodney D. Thurman
ISA Board Certified Master Arborist PN-2684BUM
ISA Municipal Specialist
ISA Utility Arborist
ISA Tree Risk Assessor Qualification
Appendices: Photographs, Tree Map

EXHIBIT - D

Page 258 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
14 Appendix A - Photographs
Photo 1 - View of Tree 1 to south. Note
lean to east.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 259 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
15 Photo 2 - Tree 1 with decayed anchor root on southwest side, indicated by arrow. Ink pen provided for scale

EXHIBIT - D

Page 260 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
16 Photo 3 - Tree 1 with compression bulge east side of trunk indicated by arrow shows lack of structural support.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 261 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
17 Photo 4 - Tree 1 with decay in scaffold branches. indicated by arrows.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 262 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
18 Photo 5 - View of Tree 2 to north

EXHIBIT - D

Page 263 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
19 Photo 6 - Tree 2 with decay cavity south side of trunk. Length is approximately 5.5’.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 264 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
20 Photo 7 - Tree 2 with decay cavity at scaffold union approx. 8’ above ground on southwest side of tree.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 265 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
21 Photo 8 - Tree 2 with fungal fruiting body circled and decay in south scaffold branch indicated by arrow.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 266 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
22 Photo 9 - Tree 2 with decay cavity formed by failed scaffold circled at center of tree, approximately 14 feet above ground.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 267 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
23 Photo 10 - Tree 2 perspective view of decay cavity formed by failed scaffold circled at center of tree. Cavity is circled. Other decay points below the open cavity are indicated by arrows.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 268 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
24 Photo 11 - Tree 2 view of decay cavity formed by failed scaffold.

Opening measures 13”

EXHIBIT - D

Page 269 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
25 Photo 12 - Tree 2 view of interior decay cavity formed by failed scaffold. Arrow 1 shows depth of cavity down to roots of tree.

Arrow 2 shows decay that has advanced into eastern scaffold branch.
#2
#1

EXHIBIT - D

Page 270 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
26 Photo 13 - Tree 2 measurement of
interior depth of decay cavity formed by
failed scaffold. 13’ 2”
Photo 14 - Tree 2 measurement of
exterior depth of decay cavity formed by
failed scaffold. 14’ 3”

EXHIBIT - D

Page 271 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
27 Photo 15 - View of Tree 3 to north. Overextended scaffold to west. Large decay cavity at connection to trunk.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 272 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
28 Photo 16 - Tree 3 with large decay cavity at scaffold connection to trunk.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 273 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
29 Photo 17 - View of Tree 4 with to northwest. Numerous failed scaffold branches due to overextension and internal decay.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 274 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
30 Photo 18 - View of Tree 9 to north. Numerous failed scaffold branches due to overextension and internal decay.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 275 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
31 Photo 19 - Tree 9 close-up of failed scaffold branch with internal decay.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 276 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
32 Photo 20 - View of Tree 10 to south.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 277 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
33 Photo 21 - Tree 10 with decayed scaffold branch indicated by yellow arrows.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 278 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
34 Photo 22 - View of Tree 11 to north. At least 5 decayed scaffold branches would be removed which would reduce the tree at least 50%. Arrows indicate branch removal points.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 279 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
35 Photo 23 - Tree 11 close up of declining canopy, decayed branches, and dead wood indicated by arrows.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 280 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
36 Photo 24 - Tree 11 close up of root crown decay at southwest side of tree indicated by yellow arrow. Ant nest discovered here which indicates dead and rotting wood.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 281 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
37 Photo 25 - View of Tree 13 to north. Note overextended scaffold branches indicated by arrows.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 282 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
38 Photo 26 - Tree 13 with root decay cavity on south side of tree indicated by arrow.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 283 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
39 Photo 27 - Tree 13 with bulging root-crown indicating possible butt-rot.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 284 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
40 Photo 28- Tree 13 with decaying scaffold branch east side of canopy indicated by arrow. Line indicates locations for removal

EXHIBIT - D

Page 285 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
41 Photos 29 & 30 - Example of oak tree that failed due to root and butt-rot. Photo 29 shows failed roots. Photo 30 shows internal decay of trunk.

EXHIBIT - D

Page 286 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
42 Appendix B – Tree Map
Tree Locations Map – Red = removals, Green = retain and protect, Dashed line delineates property boundaries.
2 1 9
10 13
3 11
4 Home

Page 287 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 10
RESOLUTION 24-XXX (C)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP PR 22-0054
2930 UNION ROAD, APN: 025-362-043
APPLICANT – COVELOP/MD3
WHEREAS, the City of Paso Robles has received applications from Kirk Consulting on behalf of Covelop/MD3, requesting a commercial subdivision, development plan, conditional use permit, and oak tree removal permit, to develop an approximate 14-acre site with six (6) commercial/light industrial buildings totaling 240,327± square feet; and
WHEREAS, the Project will require the following entitlements: Planned Development PD 22-20, Oak Tree Removal 23-11 for six (6) native oak trees, Vesting Tentative Tract Map PR 22-0054, and Conditional Use Permit 23-14; and
WHEREAS, the site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial Service (CS) and is in the Commercial Light-Industrial zoning district, Planned Development zoning overlay (C3-PD); and WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Tract Map PR 22-0054 would subdivide Parcel 6, which is currently 6.76 (net) acres, into two parcels where Parcel A would be 4.03 acres and Parcel B would be 2.73 acres. Existing Lot 13 is approximately 7 acres and while included as part of the development plan, is not included in the subdivision; and
WHEREAS, commercial and light-industrial uses, included warehousing, are allowed uses in the C3-PD zoning district and are not considered detrimental to the City’s efforts to revitalize the downtown; and WHEREAS, this project is located in the geographic area east of Golden Hill Road, south of Union Road and Highway 46 East, and is subject to Zoning Code Section 21.13.030F, to ensure the project is designed in a manner that is compatible with the neighboring land uses, including the residentially zoned property to the south of Lot 13; and
WHEREAS, the purpose and intent of the planned development (PD) district zoning overlay is to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of residential, commercial, and industrial developments. Approval of a development plan is required for all development in the planned development (overlay) district; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Statutes and Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq., and the City’s Procedures for Implementing CEQA, an Initial Study and a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) SCH 2023090132 were prepared circulated for a 30-day public review period beginning on September 11, 2023 and October 10, 2023, and notice was provided by: (1) filing a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) with the State Clearinghouse; (2) filing an NOI with the San Luis Obispo County Clerk; (3) placing an NOI in the Tribune Newspaper, a newspaper of general circulation; (4) mailing the NOI to various interested persons, agencies, and tribes; and (5) posting the NOI on the City website; and WHEREAS, the Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the design of the project at their meeting on July 31, 2023, where they were in favor of the project and recommended that the project be scheduled before

Page 288 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 10
the Planning Commission for review. The DRC requested more detailed information related to internal pedestrian connectivity, truck turning movements, and additional perspective views of buildings would be helpful for the Planning Commission to review; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2023 to consider the Final MND and the MMRP prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony and written comments on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional Use Permit; at the close of this public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended, on a 5-0 vote (two Commissioners were absent), that the City Council adopt the MND, the MMRP, and the proposed Project with the addition of conditions of approval to address the APCD letter; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the City Council on November 7, 2023 to consider the Final MND and MMRP prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, on November 7, 2023 just prior to the start of the City Council meeting information was provided by Lozeau Drury, LLP, on behalf of SAFER, indicting concerns with the project MND; and WHEREAS, on 5-0 vote the City Council unanimously continued the item to the December 5, 2023, City Council agenda to allow staff and the applicant time to review the information provided from SAFER; and WHEREAS on December 5, 2023, the City Council continued the item to a date uncertain; and WHEREAS, on January 31, 2023, the City Clerk received a letter from Lozeau Drury, LLP, withdrawing the previous comments on the MND for the project, indicating that SAFER and the applicants have reached an agreement resolving the issues raised in their comments on the project; and WHEREAS, the project was duly noticed for the February 20, 2024 City Council Agenda; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted by the City Council on February 20, 2024, to consider the Final MND and MMRP prepared for the proposed project, and to accept public testimony on the Development Plan, Oak Tree Removal Permit, Vesting Tentative Tract Map, and Conditional Use Permit.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Recitals. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

1. The proposed subdivision is designed, to the extent feasible, to provide for passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities because both lots are substantial in size and provide opportunities for the building to be designed in a manner that achieves passive heating or cooling. All buildings will be required to meet the energy efficiency requirements of the California Building Codes for commercial, light industrial and warehouse type buildings.

2. The subdivision and the provisions for its design and improvement are consistent with the general plan for the City of El Paso de Robles ("General Plan"), and the City of El Paso de Robles zoning ordinance (“Zoning Ordinance”), because:

Page 289 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 10
a. The Tentative Tract Map provides for land uses compatible with the commercial lightindustrial land use classifications, and the provisions for design and improvements promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan because it provides for two large parcels that can accommodate campus-like industrial development in an area for attractive businesses and industries; and
b. The Tentative Tract Map provides for land uses compatible with the C3-PD zoning district, and the provisions for design and improvements comply with the implementation policies and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance because the proposed parcels meet the minimum lot size requirement and would not create any lots without street frontage.

3. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed in the Tentative Tract Map because the resulting parcels would meet the minimum lot size requirement of the zoning district.

4. The subdivision design and improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because there are no significant drainage features, riparian habitat, or wetlands that were observed on the site.

5. The subdivision design and type of improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map are not likely to cause serious public health problems because all development and public improvements will be performed per the requirements of all applicable standards and codes, including the zoning and building codes.

6. The subdivision design and type of improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the subject site because the tract map acknowledges existing easements for road purposes.

7. As conditioned, the design of lots, streets, open space, drainage, sewers, water, and other improvements is consistent with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance since the map requires all utilities including sewer and water to be extended to serve all parcels.

8. The discharge of waste into an existing sewer system from development proposed in the Tentative Tract Map will not cause a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the local water quality control board because all buildings within the subdivision will be required to hook up to the existing public sewer system that exists in the streets adjacent to this project.

Section 3: Environmental Determination. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq., “CEQA”), and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§ 15000 et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines), the City prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH #2023090132) (“MND”) that analyzed the proposed Project’s environmental impacts. The MND was made available to the public for review from September 11, 2023 through October 10, 2023. On October 10, 2023, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing and considered the entire administrative record (as of that date), including staff reports, the MND, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (“MMRP”), and oral and written testimony from interested persons, all of whom were given an opportunity to be heard. Resolution No. 2023-__ recommends adoption of the MND and MMRP, and, among other things, properly assesses the environmental impact of the Project in accordance with CEQA. This Resolution incorporates by reference the environmental findings and analysis set forth in Resolution 2023-__, including the MND and MMRP, as if fully set forth herein.

Section 4: Recommendation for Approval. The City Council approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map PR 22-0054, subject to the following:

Page 290 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 10

EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION
A Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
B Standard Conditions of Approval
C Vesting Tentative Tract Map PR 22-0022
APPROVED this 20th day of February 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:

Melissa Boyer, City Clerk

Page 291 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A
Site Specific Conditions of Approval – VTTM 22-0054
Planning Division Conditions:

1. The applicant/developer shall comply with the checked standard Conditions of Approval, “Exhibit B” of Resolution 23-_____.

NOTE: In the event of conflict or duplication between standard and site-specific conditions, the site-specific condition shall supersede the standard condition.

EXHIBITDESCRIPTION
A Site-Specific Conditions of Approval
B Standard Conditions of Approval
C Tentative Tract Map

3. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map PR 22-0054 allows for the subdivision of Parcel 6, into two parcels where Parcel A would be 4.03 acres and Parcel B would be 2.73 acres. Existing Lot 13 is approximately 7-acres and is included as part of the development plan, and is not included in the subdivision.

4. Approval of this project is valid for a period of two (2) years from date of City Council approval.

Unless construction permits have been issued and site work has begun, the approval of Planned Development 22-20 shall expire on ____________. The Planning Commission may extend this expiration date if a Time Extension application has been filed with the City along with the fees before the expiration date.

Engineering Division Conditions:

2. The applicant shall provide a 10’ public utility easement on the southerly side of the right of way for Ardmore Road across the project northerly frontage. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

3. The applicant shall offer to dedicate a 60’ right of way for roadway purposes for Street “A” as shown on the vesting tentative parcel map. TIMING: Prior to prior to final map recordation

Page 292 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Exhibit A

5. The applicant shall grant the City an Avigation Easement across all parcels in a form acceptable to the City Engineer. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

6. Public Storm Drain easements across Lot 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING:

Prior to final map recordation

7. Reciprocal drainage easement on northerly side of Lot 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

8. Reciprocal access easements on the northerly side of Parcel 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

9. Temporary grading easement on the northerly side of Lot 13 – Not a part of the tentative parcel Map. TIMING: Prior to final map recordation

Page 293 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

STANDARD DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
Development Plan – PD22-20 Conditional Use Permit – CUP 23-14 Tentative Parcel Map Tentative Tract Map VTTM 22-0054
Approval Body: City Council Date of Approval:

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - The applicant shall contact the Community Development Department, (805) 237-3970, for compliance with the following conditions:

A. GENERAL CONDITIONS – PD/CUP:

Owner understands and acknowledges that City is under no obligation to defend any legal actions challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project.

Page 294 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
condition, that such action is necessary to permit reasonable operation and use for this approval.

5. The site shall be kept in a neat manner at all times and the landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition.

6. All signs shall be subject to review and approval as required by Municipal Code Section 21.19 and shall require a separate application and approval prior to installation of any sign.

9. All outdoor storage shall be screened from public view by landscaping and walls or fences per Section 21.21.110 of the Municipal Code.

Exhibit B

Page 295 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

13. All existing and/or new lighting shall be shielded so as to be directed downward in such a manner as to not create off-site glare or adversely impact adjacent properties.

The style, location and height of the lighting fixtures shall be submitted with the building plans and shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director or his designee.

18. No storage of trash cans or recycling bins shall be permitted within the public rightof-way.

21. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
Development Review Committee shall approve the following:

B. GENERAL CONDITIONS – TRACT/PARCEL MAP:

Exhibit B

Page 296 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

The City will promptly notify subdivider of any such claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense thereof.

They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the affected City Departments.

4. Street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission, prior to approval of the final map.

All conditions marked are applicable to the above referenced project for the phase indicated.

C. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK:

1. The applicant shall enter into an Engineering Plan Check and Inspection Services Agreement with the City.

D. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT:

2. Any existing Oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved as required in City Ordinance No. 553, Municipal Code No. 10.01 "Oak Tree Exhibit B

Page 297 of 356 ends

4. A Soils and/or Geology Report providing technical specifications for grading of the site shall be prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer.

E. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:

2. The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan signed as approved by a representative of each public utility.

F. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:

The Planning Commission has made a finding that the fulfillment of the construction requirements listed below are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area.

1. The applicant shall pay any current and outstanding fees for Engineering Plan Checking and Construction Inspection services.

Exhibit B

Page 298 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

2. All public improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, and accepted by the City Council for maintenance.

3. The owner shall offer to dedicate and improve the following street(s) to the standard indicated:

Street Name City Standard Drawing No.

Ardmore Road Modified A-4
“A” Street Modified A-4

Bonds required and the amount shall be as follows:

Performance Bond...............100% of improvement costs.

Labor and Materials Bond........50% of performance bond.

Page 299 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
c. Sewer Facilities Easement;
d. Landscape Easement;
e. Storm Drain Easement.

12. All final property corners shall be installed prior to final occupancy.

13. All areas of the project shall be protected against erosion by hydro seeding or landscaping.

Page 300 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES

STANDARD DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
Project:

Planning Number: Date:

Applicant shall contact PRFES, (805) 227-7560, for compliance with the following conditions:

G. GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. Prior to the start of construction:

Plans shall be reviewed, approved, and permit issued by PRFES for Underground Fire Line (underground fire line shown on any civil set is for reference only and shall indicate so on each civil page).

Applicant shall provide documentation to PRFES that required fire flows can be provided to meet project demands. Refer to CFC Appendix B.

Exhibit B
Covelop P22-0123 10/04/2023 ✔
✔
✔

Page 301 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

2. Prior to delivery of combustible materials:

Fire hydrants shall be installed and operative to current, adopted edition of the CFC. Refer to CFC Appendix C & CC.

Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be located on the addressed side of the building and within 150 feet of a fire hydrant, and must not block collector or arterial roadways. Refer to PRMC.

Truck access road shall be minimum 26’ in width with at least 13’ 6” of vertical clearance. Minimum set-back 15’, maximum 30’. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Provide temporary turn-around for phased construction streets that exceed 150’ in length. Refer to Paso Robles Standard Details and Specifications.

Project shall provide a secondary access fire road approved by PRFES. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Exhibit B
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Page 302 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

3. Provide on address side of building if applicable:

Fire alarm annunciator panel location to be approved by PRFES.

Knox Box key entry box or system.

FDC location and access path must be approved by PRFES.

Minimum 6” high, contrasting background address numbers with location, size, and contrast to be approved by PRFES.

6. Motorized Gates blocking fire access require a separate PRFES permit, must include PRFES Knox Key Switch access (not CALFIRE), and meet CFC requirements. Refer to CFC Appendix D.

Exhibit B
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Page 303 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

7. Provide permanent turn-around for driveway/access roads that exceed 150’ in length. See Paso Robles Standard Details and Specification Standard.

8. Fire extinguisher placement shall be approved by PRFES.

9. Landscape plant selections shall be fire resistive within 30’ of structures.

10. Landscape trees (including potential crown at maturity) must not project into required vertical clearance of the fire access lanes.

11. Project shall comply with all requirements in current, adopted edition of CFC and PRMC.

12. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy:

Final inspections shall be completed on all underground fire lines, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems and chemical hood fire suppression systems.

A site pre-fire plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Marshal. Contact the Paso Robles Fire Prevention Office for the exact requirements.

A Final Fire Walk-through inspection shall be completed on all buildings.

Additional Notes:

Exhibit B
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔

Page 304 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS
815
81 820
820
820
820
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
825
830 830 830 830 835 835
830
827 828 829
831
831
832
832
825
830
827
828
829
829
833
832
830 829828
829
829
828
827
826
830

WL WL WL WL WL WL WL
CO

GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS

UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL UTL
833
831
GA
823
820
820
825
830
825
CO
825

30.00' OFFER OF

DEDICATION FOR

ROAD PURPOSES

30.00' PROPOSED OFFER OF

DEDICATION OF ROAD PURPOSES
(PER SEPARATE DOCUMENT)

EXISTING GROSS

7.54 AC

PARCEL B
118773.33 SF

2.73 AC

DEDICATION FOR

30.00' OFFER OF

PARCEL A
175717.95 SF

4.03 AC

10.00' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT
EASEMENT NOTE:

PRIVATE RECIPROCAL VEHICULAR ACCESS, RECIPROCAL PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,

RECIPROCAL PARKING, STORM DRAIN & DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND PUE OVER ALL

OF PARCELS A & B, INCLUSIVE, EXCLUDING BUILDING LOCATIONS FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE PRESENT AND FUTURE PARCEL OWNERS OF PARCELS A & B.

SURVEY NOTES:

1. BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY BY TUCKER J. SANDERS AT NORTH COAST ENGINEERING.

DRAWING NO.

DATE:DRAWN BY:JOB #:

OF
®

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 80
1 IN = 40 FT
0 20
46 101

CITY LIMITS

PROJECT
SITE
CITY of El PASO de ROBLES
VICINITY MAP:

UTILITIES:

WATER: City of El Paso de Robles
SEWER: City of El Paso de Robles
ELECTRICITY: PG&E
GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS Co.

TELEPHONE: AT&T
CABLE TV: CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PARCEL INFORMATION:

LEGEND:

PROPOSED PUBLIC STREET OFFER OF DEDICATION.PROPOSED OFFER OF DEDICATION OF ROAD PURPOSES (PER SEPARATE DOCUMENT).

41.00' Existing Road Section

30.00' 10.00' 10.00' 5.00' 5.00'

60.00'

5.00' 5.00' 20.00' 20.00' 5.00' 5.00'

ARDMORE ROAD STREET SECTION

NEW ROAD STREET SECTION

ARDMORE EXTENSION

60.00'
BIOSWALE1.00'
R/W

R/W R/WR/W
CLCL

20.00' 5.00'

10.00' PUE

10.00'
PUE

PARCEL A PARCEL B
10' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT
PER 82 PM 86
15' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT
PER 144 DEEDS 138PER 82/PM/86

40.00'

RECIPROCAL
ACCESS

EASEMENT

20.00' 20.00'

35.00'

RECIPROCAL DRAINAGE

EASEMENT

BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT

15.00' 20.00' TEMPORARY GRADING EASEMENT BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT BIOSWALE
BIOSWALE

BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT

BY SEPARATE

DOCUMENT
Exhibit
C

Page 305 of 356 ends

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
Account # Order Number Identification Order PO Amount Cols Depth 18693 518784 Print Legal Ad-IPL01588910 - IPL0158891 24.02.20.P22-0017.CC $204.48 2 47 L Attention: Vikki Kuntz
City of Paso Robles 893989
1000 SPRING ST.

PASO ROBLES, CA 93446
[email protected]
In The Superior Court of The State of California
In and for the County of San Luis Obispo
1 insertion(s) published on:
02/09/24
Legals Clerk

STATE OF TEXAS)
SS
County of Dallas)
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen and not interested in the above entitled matter; I am now, and at all times embraced in the publication herein mentioned
was, the principal clerk of the printers and publishers of The Tribune, a newspaper of general Circulation,
printed and published daily at the City of San Luis
Obispo in the above named county and state; that
notice at which the annexed clippings is a true copy, was published in the above-named newspaper and not in
any supplement thereof - on the following dates to wit; From 02/09/2024 To 02/09/2024 that said newspaper
was duly and regularly ascertained and established a
newspaper of general circulation by Decree entered in
the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, State of
California, on June 9, 1952, Case #19139 under the Gover I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Notary Public in and for the state of Texas, residing in Dallas County
Extra charge for lost or duplicate affidavits.

Legal document please do not destroy!
Attachment 11

Page 306 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”
1000 SPRING STREET • PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446 • www.prcity.com

AFFIDAVIT

OF MAIL NOTICES

CITY COUNCIL NOTICING
I, Marci Reynoso , employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, California, do hereby certify that the mail notices have been processed as required for the February 20, 2024 public hearing for PD22- 20 / VTPR 22-0054 / OTR23-11 / CUP22-21 on this 9
th day of February, 2024.

City of El Paso de Robles
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Signed:

Marci Reynoso
Attachment 12

Page 307 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Council Agenda Report
From: Elizabeth Wagner Hull, City Attorney
Ty Lewis, City Manager
Subject: Introduction and first reading of an Ordinance Amending Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 12.42, Parking Management, to clarify the process for setting parking rates, reestablishing the Downtown Parking Zone and other clean up measures.

Report back by City Manager on implementation of new parking rates and provide direction to staff regarding a refund process for parking fees paid in the Downtown Parking Zone from February 6, 2023, to February 6, 2024 pursuant to the period authorized under the Government Claims Act.

CEQA Determination: The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section , §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)- (3), 15378.

Date: February 20, 2024
Facts

1. On October 16, 2018, the City Council heard the first reading of an ordinance revising Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 12.42, among other sections, to address charging for parking pursuant to Vehicle Code (“VC”) Section 22508.

2. Following the first reading of the ordinance City staff, community members and an Ad Hoc Committee met to consider comments made by the community at the first reading and recommended minor revisions to the ordinance.

3. On November 6, 2018, the City Council approved the second reading and adopted the ordinance (the “2018 Parking Management Ordinance”) incorporating the minor modifications recommended by the Ad Hoc committee and the community following the first reading.

4. Between November 2018 and May 2019, City staff continued to meet internally and with the community regarding the implementation of the new parking program.

5. On May 7, 2019, the City Council heard a Downtown Parking update and, by motion recorded as a minute action, approved two hours of free parking in the area from 10th St to 14th St and Spring St to Pine St (“Downtown Parking Zone”), between 9 a.m. – 6 p.m., Monday-Friday, with paid parking to be initiated when and where appropriate after two hours (“Paid Parking Program”).

6. On May 21, 2019, the City Council approved agreements with vendors to implement the Paid Parking Program.

7. In August 2019, the City began charging for parking pursuant to the Paid Parking Program.

8. Between August 2019 and May 2022, the Downtown Parking Advisory Commission and community continued to review aspects of the Paid Parking Program. In May 2022, the City Council disbanded the Downtown Parking Advisory Commission.

9. On March 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 21-035, which extended the Paid Parking Program to operate Monday-Sunday, from 9 a.m. – 8 p.m. each day.

Page 308 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

10. Between December 2022 and November 2023, the City Council heard numerous items related to the Paid Parking Program designed to assess the implementation and fiscal impacts of the Paid Parking Program.

11. On November 21, 2023, the City Council approved, by motion and recorded as a minute action, charging $1 per hour starting at minute 1 within the Downtown Parking Zone, allowing unlimited senior permits for City residents, and the design and ordering of new signage. The Council also requested the City Manager to return with any additional actions requiring Council action to implement the revisions to the Paid Parking Program and to provide an update to the Council.

12. Following that action a number of community members asserted the City did not have the ability to charge for parking in the downtown area because the City did not have an ordinance addressing the imposition of parking rates.

13. In response to the community concerns the City Attorney’s office conducted a review of the City’s existing Parking Management Ordinance, PRMC 12.42, and all actions taken since its adoption to confirm that the parking program was implemented consistent with the requirements of the Vehicle Code and the City’s own ordinance. .

14. Following an initial review of the implementation of Municipal Code Chapter 12.42 the City paused charging for parking and issuing citations associated with parking in the Downtown Parking Zone effective February 7, 2024.

Options

1. Take no action ;

2. Introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles amending Chapter 12.42 of Title 12 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code to clarify the process for setting parking rates, reestablishing the Downtown Parking Zone and other clean up measures; provide feedback to the City Manager on the implementation and signage for the new rates (once effective); and provide direction to staff regarding the proposed refund of parking fees collected from February 6, 2023 to February 6, 2024.

3. Provide alternative direction to staff.

Analysis and Conclusions
Review of Downtown Paid Parking Program by City Attorney The City has maintained downtown parking and associated paid parking rates, with varying structures, for many years. Chapters 12.38, 12.42 and 12.45 of the City’s Municipal Code all include codified local law adopted by ordinance relevant to City’s downtown parking. More recently, on November 21, 2023, City Council had a properly agendized discussion on the future of downtown parking in response to the findings and recommendations of the City Council ad hoc, which was created to consider changes to the downtown parking program. At that meeting, by a 3-2 roll call vote, the City Council decided (as described within the adopted minutes for that meeting): “to charge $1 per hour from minute one of the [downtown] parking session; to allow unlimited senior parking permits for residents over 65 years old within the City limits for one vehicle per household; to continue all other existing parking regulations; to direct staff to improve the signage and kiosks; and to direct staff to bring back any other required future formal action items related to parking” (the “November Parking Action”).

Following that action concerns were raised suggesting the City’s November Parking Action violated State law. Specifically, it has been asserted that Vehicle Code section 22508(a) required the Council to have noticed and approved an ordinance to properly effectuate the November Parking Action. In response to those concerns the City Attorney reviewed the adoption of the Parking Management Ordinance in 2018 and the actions taken by the City since that time to implement the Parking Management Ordinance. As

Page 309 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
described below, the assertion that the November Parking Action violated state law is incorrect. However, the review of actions implementing the 2018 Ordinance uncovered that the Downtown Parking Zone was not established correctly.

VC 22508 provides, in part, that a city “shall not establish parking meter zones of fix the rates for those zones except by ordinance. The rate of fees may be variable, based upon criteria identified by the local authority in the ordinance. An ordinance establishing a parking meter zone shall describe the area that would be included within the zone.”
The City adopted the 2018 Parking Management Ordinance to comply with VC 22508. The 2018 Ordinance provides for the establishment of parking meter zones, provides criteria to establish the variable rate of fees charged, and provides that parking meter zones were to be adopted by subsequent ordinance or resolution. After much public engagement and input the Paid Parking Program was designed to delegate authority to City Manager regarding time limits and parking rates based upon variable criteria. As adopted by the Council, and presently in effect, the 2018 Parking Management Ordinance sets forth a regulatory system which provides that within parameters set by the Council, the City Manager is authorized to set time limits and rates pursuant to his judgement to achieve the 85% parking utilization rate. Achieving the 85% parking utilization rate is the goal set by the Council.

Based upon the delegated authority within the City’s ordinance, the November 21, 2023 action was consistent with the 2018 Parking Management Ordinance. However, during the review of the matter by the City Attorney, it was discovered that the footprint of the Downtown Parking Zone was created by motion and recorded in the minutes (on May 7, 2019) and, was not created by ordinance or resolution as required by Municipal Code section 12.42.020. As a result, it has been determined that the Downtown Parking Zone was not appropriately formed. The City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, determined that pausing the enforcement of the downtown parking program was appropriate until the Downtown Parking Zone could be reestablished consistent with the Municipal Code requirements. As such, the City paused the collection of parking fees in the Downtown Parking Zone effective February 7, 2024. In addition, the City has voided all parking citations received and unpaid prior to that date. The Parking Program will remain paused until the City Council has adopted an ordinance amending PRMC Chapter 12.42, Parking Management, to clarify the Downtown Parking Zone.

Modification to PRMC Chapter 12.42, Parking Management
During the review of the Downtown Paid Parking Program and in light of the confusion resulting from the structure of the ordinance, the following revisions to Chapter 12.42 are recommended to the Council. The recommendations, though not required to be compliant with VC Section 22508, are intended to make clarifying changes to the ordinance and codify the area covered by the Downtown Parking Zone. The modifications describe the Council approved range of parking rates from $1-$5 per hour. The City Manager is then authorized to modify the charged rate and time limits to facilitate achieving the desired 85% utilization rate. VC 22508 does not require the local ordinance to set a definitive parking rate. Rather, it allows for the local ordinance to provide that the rate of fees may be variable based upon criteria in the local ordinance. The proposed modifications to PRMC 12.42 reiterate the intent of the 2018 Parking Management Ordinance but more clearly establish the parameters and criteria by which the parking rates may be modified in the future without amending the ordinance. Additionally, a provision has been added to clarify the basis for the Senior Parking Permit Program pursuant to VC 22507. Specifically, the changes are:

Page 310 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024

12.42.020 Parking zones.

A. Parking zones shall be established by the city council by ordinance or resolution, which may include the establishment of time limits and/or parking rates for such zones.

B. The City Council does hereby establish the Downtown Parking Zone which shall include the area extending from 10th Street to 14th Street, from Spring Street to Pine Street and the 900 block of both 12th and 13th Streets (from Pine Street to Railroad Street).

12.42.060 Overparking—Exceptions.

It shall be unlawful for any person, except outside of the designated parking zone hours and days of operation, to cause, allow, permit, or suffer any vehicle registered in his/her name or operated or controlled by him/her to be parked in any parking space upon any street within a parking zone or within a parking lot as indicated by proper signs placed in such zone or lot indicating the maximum parking time allowed in such parking space. A vehicle will be deemed to have been parked longer than the posted time limit, if it has not been moved at least "out of the parking zone" or parking lot after the expiration of the maximum time limitation indicated on the posted signage. A The specific parking zone for which local parking regulations apply is defined as the parking zonewill be indicated on posted signage. A vehicle may not return to the initial parking zone or parking lot sooner than two hours following the expiration of the initial time period. Within parameters set by the city council, the city manager or their designee may set and adjust the parking zones, posted time limits, and/or period of operation of paid parking between the hours of seven o'clock a.m. and ten o'clock p.m. on any day, with the intent of achieving the target utilization rate of eighty-five percent.

12.42.070 Parking zone regulations – Authority.

B. All parking zone time limits and/or paid parking rates heretofore established shall be and remain in effect unless otherwise set or adjusted by the city council. The city council establishes that a paid parking session commences immediately upon parking, as provided in 12.42.080, unless otherwise determined by the city manager, or their designee. The length of time allowed for a timed parking session for each parking area shall be established by the city manager, or their designee, and range of time limits limits from a minimum of fifteen minutes to a maximum of ten hours. The city manager, or their designee, shall set the time limit of each parking zone, consistent with achieving the eighty-five percent target utilization rate, based upon parking occupancy data and community input. The city manager, or their designee, may designate certain parking spots as a maximum of 15 minutes and, if determined by the city manager, or their designee, to be consistent with achieving the 85% parking utilization rate or in the best interest of the community, provide that those designated parking spots do not require payment.

C. Under the authority of California Vehicle Code section 22508, the City Council establishes a range of hourly parking rates from $1.00 to $5.00. The City Manager, or their designee, shall set the rate of the parking zones within that range consistent with achieving the 85 percent target utilization.

D. Under the authority of California Vehicle Code section 22507, the city council may establish preferential parking privileges associated with any Parking Zone or other area by ordinance or resolution with provisions reasonable and necessary to ensure the effectiveness of a preferential parking program.

Implementation of November 21, 2023 Action
As described above, at the November 21, 2023, Council meeting, by a 3-2 roll call vote, the City Council decided: “to charge $1 per hour from minute one of the [downtown] parking session; to allow unlimited

Page 311 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
senior parking permits for residents over 65 years old within the City limits for one vehicle per household; to continue all other existing parking regulations; to direct staff to improve the signage and kiosks; and to direct staff to bring back any other required future formal action items related to parking.” Additionally, the Council requested the City Manager return to the Council to provide an update on the new signage and related matters.

Following the effective date of the modifications to PRMC 12.42, if adopted by the Council, the City will proceed with an education program to ensure the public is aware of the changes to the program. New signage will be installed and parking ambassadors will be available to update the public on the new program. If adopted the modifications to PRMC 12.42 would be effective on Friday, April 5, 2024 (30 days following a second reading on March 5, 2024). Between the adoption of the changes to PRMC 12.42, City staff will be working with the community to educate them on the new parking program prior to its implementation on April 5, 2024.

Effective April 5, 2024, the Downtown Parking Zone cost for parking would be $1 per hour. Although the previous rate structure was generally achieving a utilization rate between 75-85% busy days exceeded the 85% threshold. Additionally, as has been previously presented to the Council, the two hour free parking has been technologically difficult to implement. This revised rate structure is anticipated to achieve a similar utilization rate and, as a flat rate will be less confusing for the public, will result in a system that is easier to implement for staff and consistent with the technological capabilities of the kiosk/meter system.

Based upon the foregoing, its implementation will be consistent with the ordinance.

Additionally, if this ordinance is approved by the Council tonight, staff will return with a resolution, at the same meeting as the second reading of the ordinance is heard, to memorialize the senior parking permit program. Specifically, the resolution will implement modifications to expand the program consistent with the direction from the City Council at the November 21, 2023 meeting.

Consideration of Refunds for Parking Payments Received
Although the City has not received any valid claims for a refund of downtown parking fees, it seems appropriate to provide an opportunity for customers who paid for parking to apply for and receive a refund. Under the Government Claims Act, claims for overpayment of fees may only reach back to payments for the prior one year.

As such, staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding providing a refund and, if the Council would like to voluntarily provide refunds in lieu of requiring people to file a claim under the Government Claims Act, an appropriate refund mechanism for the parking fees collected and citations issued within the 12 months prior to the downtown parking program being paused. Staff envisions a refund process including the following components:
 A refund payment to customers who can demonstrate through credit card charge or other mechanism a payment for parking (fees or citation) between February 6, 2023, and February 6, 2024.
 The amount of the refund would be the amount demonstrated paid by the customer during that period.
 To receive the refund the customer will be required to sign a waiver agreeing not bring a claim/lawsuit arising from the imposition of Downtown Parking fees prior to February 7, 2024.

This waiver will be included on the claim form provided by the City to process the refund. The claim form will be available on the City’s website or by hardcopy at City Hall.

Page 312 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
 A city website announcement of the refund process.
 Customers would have 120 days to complete and return the refund form to the City from the date the City website goes live with information on the refund process.

Fiscal Impact
The total cost to manage and operate the downtown parking program is approximately $500,000 per year.

Because of the significant start-up costs associated with the technology and kiosks of the parking program, City Council approved a General Fund loan to the Parking Program until program revenues were sufficient to operate independently. As of February 15, 2024, the loan balance is approximately $511,500. If City Council were to not reestablish the downtown parking program, the program would be dissolved, and the General Fund loan written off.

The fiscal impacts regarding the refunds for the parking fees and citations issued within the 12 months prior to the downtown parking program being paused is significant. Over the past year, there have been 62,445 parking sessions, totaling $177,000, and 7,688 parking citations, totaling $384,000. As such, assuming that 100% of the people who paid for parking during the past year complete and return a claim form, the refund would have a fiscal impact of approximately $561,000. However, this will be very time intensive and additional resources will be needed to handle the potential influx of 60,000+ requests for refunds. This would further exacerbate the loss to the General Fund mentioned above.

CEQA
The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State Guidelines Section §§15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council take the following actions:

1. Introduce for first reading by title only, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of El Paso de Robles amending Chapter 12.42 of Title 12 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code to clarify the process for setting parking rates, reestablishing the Downtown Parking Zone and other clean up measures.

2. Receive the report from the City Manager on the implementation and signage for the new downtown parking program (once effective).

3. Direct staff to implement the proposed process as outlined in this report to provide refunds of parking fees collected and citations from February 6, 2023 to February 6, 2024.

Attachments

1. Ordinance XXXX - Amending Chapter 12.42 of the El Paso de Robles Municipal Code

2. Proposed Signage for Downtown Paid Parking Program

3. Draft-Downtown Parking Refund Request Form

4. Draft-No Enforcement Days

Page 313 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. XXXX N.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES AMENDING PASO ROBLES MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.42, PARKING MANAGEMENT, TO CLARIFY

THE PROCESS FOR SETTING PARKING RATES, REESTABLISHING THE DOWNTOWN PARKING ZONE AND

OTHER CLEAN UP MEASURES
WHEREAS, on October 16, 2018 the City Council heard the first reading of an ordinance revising Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 12.42, among other sections, to address charging for parking pursuant to Vehicle Code (“VC”) Section 22508; and
WHEREAS, following the first reading of the ordinance City staff, community members and an Ad Hoc Committee met to consider comments made by the community at the first reading and recommended minor revisions to the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on November 6, 2018, the City Council approved the second reading and adopted the ordinance (the “2018 Parking Management Ordinance”) incorporating the minor modifications recommended by the Ad Hoc committee and the community following the first reading; and WHEREAS, between November 2018 and May 2019 City staff continued to meet internally and with the community regarding the implementation of the new parking program; and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, the City Council heard a Downtown Parking update and, by motion recorded as a minute action, approved 2 hours of free parking in the area from 10th St to 14th St and Spring St to Pine St (“Downtown Parking Zone”), between 9 am – 6 pm, Monday-Friday, with paid parking to be initiated when and where appropriate after 2 hours (“Paid Parking Program”); and WHEREAS, on May 21, 2019, the City Council approved agreements with vendors to implement the Paid Parking Program ; and
WHEREAS, in August 2019, the City began charging for parking pursuant to the Paid Parking Program; and
WHEREAS, between August 2019 and May 2022, the Downtown Parking Advisory Commission and community continued to review aspects of the Paid Parking Program. In May 2022, the City Council disbanded the Downtown Parking Advisory Commission; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution 21-035, which extended the Paid Parking Program to operate Monday-Sunday, from 9 am – 8 pm each day; and WHEREAS, between December 2022 and November 2023, the City Council heard numerous items related to the Paid Parking Program designed to assess the implementation and fiscal impacts of the Paid Parking Program; and
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2023, the City Council approved, by motion and recorded as a minute action, charging $1 per hour starting at minute 1 within the Downtown Parking Zone, allowing unlimited senior permits for City residents, and the design and ordering of new signage. The Council also requested the City Manager to return with any additional actions requiring Council action to implement the revisions to the Paid Parking Program and to provide an update to the Council; and

Page 314 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 1
WHEREAS, following that action a number of community members asserted the City did not have the ability to charge for parking in the downtown area because the City did not have an ordinance addressing the imposition of parking rates; and
WHEREAS, in response to the community concerns the City Attorney’s office conducted a review of the City’s existing Parking Management Ordinance, PRMC 12.42, and all actions taken since its adoption to confirm that the parking program was implemented consistent with the requirements of the Vehicle Code and the City’s own ordinance; and
WHEREAS, following an initial review of the implementation of Municipal Code Chapter 12.42 the City paused charging for parking and issuing citations associated with parking in the Downtown Parking Zone effective February 7, 2024.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The Council hereby ordains that Chapter 12.42 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Chapter 12.42 PARKING MANAGEMENT1

12.42.010 Definitions.

A. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms used in this chapter shall have the following meanings.

B. Undefined words. The definition of any term used in the chapter not otherwise herein defined shall be the same as such terms are defined and described in the vehicle code of the state of California and amendments thereto.

C. Vehicle. The word vehicle as used herein shall mean any device in, upon or by which any person or property may be transported upon a street or highway, except those operated upon rails or tracks.

D. Park. The word park or parking, when used herein, shall mean the standing of a vehicle whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily, for the purpose of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading passengers or merchandise.

E. Parking Zone. A parking zone in this chapter is defined as a group of on-street parking spaces with time limits and/or paid parking, as indicated on posted signage. (Ord. 152 N.S. § 1, 1950)

Page 315 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 1

12.42.020 Parking zones.

A. Parking zones shall be established by the city council by ordinance, which may include the establishment of time limits and/or parking rates for such zones.

B. The City Council does hereby establish the Downtown Parking Zone which shall include the area extending from 10th Street to 14th Street, from Spring Street to Pine Street and the 900 block of 12th and 13th Streets (from Pine Street to Railroad Street). (Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.030 Authority to implement time limits.

Within parameters set by the city council, the city manager or designee is hereby authorized and directed to implement time limits in all established parking zones for the purpose of and in such numbers and at such places as in his judgment may be necessary to the regulation, control and inspection of the parking of vehicles therein. (Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, adopted Nov. 6, 2018, repealed the former § 12.42.030 and enacted a new § 12.42.030 as set out herein. The former § 12.42.030 pertained to engineer—authority to install and derived from Ord. 152 N.S., § 2, adopted in 1950.

12.42.040 Signs—Authority of engineer.

The city engineer is authorized to cause signs which fulfill the requirements of the ordinances and resolutions of the city pertaining thereto to be placed in the various parts of such zones to so indicate.
(Ord. 152 N.S. § 4, 1950)

12.42.050 Markings—Painting—Parking within.

The city engineer may have lines or markings painted or placed upon the curb or street adjacent to indicate individual parking spaces. It shall be unlawful to park any vehicle across any such line or marking or to park a vehicle in such a position that the same shall not be entirely within the space designated by such lines or markings. (Ord. 152 N.S. § 5, 1950)
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.060 Overparking—Exceptions.

Page 316 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 1
parking zone or parking lot sooner than two hours following the expiration of the initial time period. Within parameters set by the city council, the city manager or their designee may set and adjust the parking zones, posted time limits, and/or period of operation of paid parking between the hours of seven o'clock a.m. and ten o'clock p.m. on any day, with the intent of achieving the target utilization rate of eighty-five percent. (Ord. 152 N.S. § 6, 1950)
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.070 Parking zone regulations—Authority.

A. It is the intent of the city council to establish a target occupancy rate of eighty-five percent for all parking zone spaces within the city of Paso Robles. Occupancy rate refers to the percentage of parking zone spaces that are occupied by vehicles. The establishment of the target occupancy rate of eighty-five percent is based on well-accepted planning studies as well as the example of other municipalities. The city council finds that the establishment of the target occupancy rate of eighty-five percent is an effective strategy for managing onstreet parking and congestion.

B. The city council establishes that a paid parking session commences immediately upon parking, as provided in 12.42.080, unless otherwise determined by the city manager, or their designee. The length of time allowed for a timed parking session for each parking area shall be established by the city manager, of their designee, and range from a minimum of fifteen minutes to a maximum of ten hours. The city manager, or their designee, shall set the time limit of each parking zone, consistent with achieving the eighty-five percent target utilization rate, based upon parking occupancy data and community input. The city manager, or their designee, may designate certain parking spots as a maximum of 15 minutes and, if determined by the city manager, or their designee, to be consistent with achieving the eightyfive percent parking utilization rate or in the best interest of the community, provide that those designated parking spots do not require payment.

C. Under the authority of California Vehicle Code section 22508, the city council establishes a range of hourly parking rates from $1.00 to $5.00. The city manager, or their designee, shall set the rate of the parking zones within that range consistent with achieving the eighty-five percent target utilization rate.

12.42.080 Payment required.

When any vehicle is parked in any space within a paid parking zone, during the established payment hours, the operator of said vehicle upon so parking shall, and it shall immediately initiate a paid parking session through a designated and city-approved payment method.
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)
Editor's note(s)—Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, adopted Nov. 6, 2018, repealed the former § 12.42.080 and enacted a new § 12.42.080 as set out herein. The former § 12.42.080 pertained to coin deposit required and derived from Ord. 152 N.S., § 8, adopted in 1950.

Page 317 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 1

12.42.090 Substitutes—Slugs.

It shall be unlawful to deposit or cause to be deposited in any paid parking device, any slug, device or metallic substitute for lawful payment. (Ord. 152 N.S. § 9, 1950)
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.100 Tampering—Destroying.

It shall be unlawful for any person to deface, injure, tamper with, open, or willfully break, destroy, or impair the usefulness of any parking signage, or other paid parking device installed pursuant to this chapter.
(Ord. 152 N.S. § 10, 1950)
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.110 Citation for violation—Procedure.

It shall be the duty of each police officer to take the number of any meter or parking zone at which any vehicle is over-parked, as provided in this chapter; the state vehicle license of such vehicle; the time and date of such over-parking, and the make of such vehicle; and issue, in writing and attach to such vehicle a citation for illegal parking in the same form and subject to the same procedure provided for by the laws of the state of California applicable to the traffic violations within this city.
(Ord. 152 N.S. § 11, 1950)
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.120 Parking ambassadors.

A. The chief of police is hereby authorized to designate regularly employed and salaried employees of the city or of a parking benefit district as parking ambassadors.

B. Civilian employees of the city of Paso Robles or a parking benefit district, as well as special contractors designated by the chief of police, shall enforce provisions of this title and the California Vehicle Code relating to the standing or parking of vehicles that legally may be enforced by persons other than peace officers.

C. Parking ambassadors shall enforce the provisions relating to regulation of traffic and to stopping, standing and parking of vehicles contained in the Paso Robles Municipal Code, the Paso Robles Traffic Code and in the California Vehicle Code. (Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)

12.42.130 Electric vehicle parking regulations.

A. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms used in this title shall have the following meanings.

1. "Electric vehicle" means either a battery electric vehicle or a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.

2. "Battery electric vehicle" means a vehicle fueled entirely by electricity stored in the onboard battery. This type of vehicle is often referred to as a zero emission vehicle.

Page 318 of 356 ends

City Council Agenda February 20, 2024
Attachment 1

3. "Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle" means a vehicle that is fueled by both a battery and another fuel source, such as a gasoline-powered internal combustion engine. This type of vehicle runs on electricity from the onboard battery until the battery is exhausted and then switches to an alternate power source.

4. "Charger" means an electrical component assembly or cluster of component assemblies designed specifically to charge batteries or other energy storage devices within electric vehicles.

5. "Actively charging" means the time during which the connector from the charger at a charging station is inserted into the inlet and electrical power is being transferred for the purpose of recharging the electric vehicle's on-board batteries.

6. "Electric vehicle charging station" means a parking space that is served by a charger.

7. "Electric vehicle charging station zone" means a dedicated parking zone for electric vehicles to park and actively connect to chargers.

8. "Connector" means a device inserted into the inlet for an electric vehicle that establishes an electrical connection from the charger to the electric vehicle for the purpose of charging and exchanging information.

9. "Inlet" means the device on the electric vehicle into which the connector is inserted for charging and information exchange.

B. Only plug-in electric vehicles that are actively charging, as indicated by the electric vehicle charging station monitor display, may be parked at electric vehicle charging stations or in electric vehicle charging station zones located on any street or any parking facility owned, leased, or operated by the city of Paso Robles.

C. No person shall park or cause to be parked or allow to remain standing any vehicle at an electric vehicle charging station or in an electric vehicle charging station zone located on any street or in any parking facility owned, leased, or operated by the city of Paso Robles, unless the vehicle is an electric vehicle, is actively charging, and has not exceeded any applicable parking time limit.
(Ord. No. 1065 N.S., § 3, 11-6-2018)
Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the language incorporated herein by reference.

Section 4. The City finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15060, subd. (c)(2)-(3), 15378.

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect 30 days after its passage and adoption as provided by Government Code section 36397.

Section 7. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published at least five (5) days prior to the meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted and shall post a certified copy of the proposed Ordinance in the Office of the City Clerk. Within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of the Ordinance, the City Clerk shall

Page 319 of 356 ends

Paso Robles City CouncilFebruary 20, 2024

Paso Robles City Council
February 20, 2024