Exhibit B
obligation to defend any legal actions challenging the City’s actions with respect to the project.
4. Any site-specific condition imposed by the Review Authority in approving this project (AMD25-02/P25-0124) may be amended or eliminated, or new conditions may be added, provided that the Planning Commission shall first conduct a public hearing in the same manner as required for the approval of this project. No such modification shall be made unless the Review Authority finds that such amendment is necessary to protect the public interest and/or neighboring properties, or, in the case of deletion of an existing condition, that such action is necessary to permit reasonable operation and use for this approval.
5. The site shall be kept in a neat manner at all times and the landscaping shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition.
6. All signs shall be subject to review and approval as required by Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 21.52 and shall require a separate application and approval prior to installation of any sign.
7. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, a landscape and irrigation plan consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 21.45 and Chapter 21.56, shall be submitted for City review and approval. The plan needs to be designed in a manner that utilizes drought tolerant plants, trees and ground covers and minimizes, if not eliminates the use of turf. The irrigation plan shall utilize drip irrigation and limit the use of spray irrigation. All existing and/or new landscaping shall be installed with automatic irrigation systems.
8. A reciprocal parking and access easement and agreement for site access, parking, and maintenance of all project entrances, parking areas, landscaping, hardscape, common open space, areas and site lighting standards and fixtures, shall be recorded prior to building occupancy. Said easement and agreement shall apply to all properties, and be referenced in the site Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs).
9. All outdoor storage shall be screened from public view by landscaping and walls or fences consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Section 21.69.170.
10. For commercial, industrial, office or multi-family projects, all refuse enclosures are required to provide adequate space for garbage, recycling, and green waste bins.
The enclosure shall be consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code 21.51 and shall be architecturally compatible with the primary building. Gates shall be view obscuring and constructed of durable materials. Size and closure details subject to approval of the City Solid Waste Manager.
11. For commercial, industrial, office or multi-family projects, all existing and/or new ground-mounted appurtenances such as air-conditioning condensers, electrical transformers, backflow devices etc., shall be screened from public view through the use of decorative walls and/or landscaping consistent with Paso Robles Municipal
Exhibit B
Code Chapter 21.47 and subject to approval by the Community Development Director or their designee. Details shall be included in the building plans.
12. All existing and/or new roof-mounted appurtenances such as air-conditioning units, grease hoods, etc. shall be screened from public view consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 21.47. The screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed of compatible materials to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director or their designee. Details shall be included in the building plans.
13. All new lighting shall be dark-sky compliant consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 21.82.
14. Existing lighting shall be brought into conformance with the standards of Chapter
21.82 as specified in Paso Robles Municipal Code Paragraph 21.82.010.B.2 unless otherwise stated in this resolution. The style, location, and height of the lighting fixtures shall be submitted with the building plans and shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Director or their designee.
15. All walls/fences and exposed retaining walls shall be constructed of decorative materials which include but are not limited to splitface block, slumpstone, stuccoed block, brick, wood, crib walls or other similar materials as determined by the Development Review Committee, but specifically excluding precision block.
16. It is the property owner's responsibility to ensure that all construction of private property improvements occur on private property. It is the owner's responsibility to identify the property lines and ensure compliance by the owner's agents.
17. Any existing oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved consistent with Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 10.01 "Oak Tree Preservation", unless specifically approved to be removed. An oak tree inventory shall be prepared listing the oak trees, their disposition, and the proposed location of any replacement trees required. In the event an oak tree is designated for removal, an approved oak Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City, prior to removal.
18. No storage of trash cans or recycling bins shall be permitted within the public rightof-way.
19. Prior to recordation of the map or prior to occupancy of a project, all conditions of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Community Developer Director or their designee.
20. Two sets of the revised Planning Commission approved plans incorporating all Conditions of Approval, standard and site specific, shall be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of building permits.
21. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
Exhibit B
Development Review Committee shall approve the following:
Planning Division Staff shall approve the following:
B. GENERAL CONDITIONS – TRACT/PARCEL MAP:
1. In accordance with Government Code Section 66474.9, the subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, or its agent, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding brought within the time period provided for in Government Code section 66499.37, against the City, or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void, annul the City's approval of this subdivision.
The City will promptly notify subdivider of any such claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense thereof.
2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and/or Articles Affecting Real Property Interests are subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department, the Public Works Department and/or the City Attorney.
They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the affected City Departments.
3. The owner shall petition to annex residential Tract (or Parcel Map) ________ into the City of Paso Robles Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 for the purposes of mitigation of impacts on the City’s Police and Emergency Services Departments.
4. Street names shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission, prior to approval of the final map.
5. The following areas shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, Homeowners’ Association, or other means acceptable to the City:
________________________________________________________ ****************************************************************************** ENGINEERING DIVISION- The applicant shall contact the Engineering Division, (805) 237- 3860, for compliance with the following conditions:
All conditions marked are applicable to the above referenced project for the phase indicated.
C. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK:
1. The applicant shall enter into an Engineering Plan Check and Inspection Services Agreement with the City.
D. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT:
1. Prior to approval of a grading plan, the developer shall apply through the City, to FEMA and receive a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) issued from FEMA. The developer's engineer shall provide the required supporting data to justify the
Exhibit B
application. The requirement may be waived if compliance with the City’s Floodplain Ordinance is demonstrated to the City Engineer’s satisfaction.
2. Any existing oak trees located on the project site shall be protected and preserved as required in Paso Robles Municipal Code Chapter 10.01 "Oak Tree Preservation", unless specifically approved to be removed. An oak tree inventory shall be prepared listing the oak trees, their disposition, and the proposed location of any replacement trees required. In the event an oak tree is designated for removal, an approved Oak Tree Removal Permit must be obtained from the City, prior to its removal.
3. A complete grading and drainage plan shall be prepared for the project by a registered civil engineer and subject to approval by the City Engineer. The project shall conform to the City’s Storm Water Discharge Ordinance.
4. A Soils and/or Geology Report providing technical specifications for grading of the site shall be prepared by a Geotechnical Engineer.
5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan per the State General Permit for Strom Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity shall be provided for any site that disturbs greater than or equal to one acre, including projects that are less than one acre that are part of a larger plan of development or sale that would disturb more than one acre.
E. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT:
1. All off-site public improvement plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The improvements shall be designed and placed to the Public Works Department Standards and Specifications.
2. The applicant shall submit a composite utility plan signed as approved by a representative of each public utility.
3. Landscape and irrigation plans for the public right-of-way shall be incorporated into the improvement plans and shall require approval by the Streets Division Supervisor and the Community Development Department.
4. In a special Flood Hazard Area as indicated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) the owner shall provide an Elevation Certificate in accordance with the National Flood Insurance program. This form must be completed by a land surveyor or civil engineer licensed in the State of California.
F. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OR RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
The Planning Commission has made a finding that the fulfillment of the construction requirements listed below are a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development
Exhibit B
of the surrounding area.
1. The applicant shall pay any current and outstanding fees for Engineering Plan Checking and Construction Inspection services.
2. All public improvements are completed and approved by the City Engineer, and accepted by the City Council for maintenance.
3. The owner shall offer to dedicate and improve the following street(s) to the standard indicated:
Street Name City Standard Standard Drawing No.
4. If, at the time of approval of the final map, any required public improvements have not been completed and accepted by the City the owner shall be required to enter into a Subdivision Agreement with the City in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.
Bonds required and the amount shall be as follows:
Performance Bond...............100% of improvement costs.
Labor and Materials Bond........50% of performance bond.
5. If the existing City street adjacent to the frontage of the project is inadequate for the traffic generated by the project, or will be severely damaged by the construction, the applicant shall excavate the entire structural section and replace it with a standard half-width street plus a 12' wide travel lane and 8' wide graded shoulder adequate to provide for two-way traffic.
6. If the existing pavement and structural section of the City street adjacent to the frontage of the project is adequate, the applicant shall provide a new structural section from the proposed curb to the edge of pavement and shall overlay the existing paving to centerline for a smooth transition.
7. Due to the number of utility trenches required for this project, the City Council adopted Pavement Management Program requires a pavement overlay on _________________ along the frontage of the project.
8. The applicant shall install all utilities. Street lights shall be installed at locations as required by the City Engineer. All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or within the project shall be relocated underground except for electrical lines 77 kilovolts or greater. All utilities shall be extended to the boundaries of the project.
9. The owner shall offer to dedicate to the City the following easement(s). The location and alignment of the easement(s) shall be to the description and satisfaction of the City Engineer:
a. Public Utilities Easement;
b. Water Line Easement;
Exhibit B
c. Sewer Facilities Easement;
d. Landscape Easement;
e. Storm Drain Easement.
10. The developer shall annex to the City's Landscape and Lighting District for payment of the operating and maintenance costs of the following:
a. Street lights;
b. Parkway/open space landscaping;
c. Wall maintenance in conjunction with landscaping;
d. Graffiti abatement;
e. Maintenance of open space areas.
11. For a building with a Special Flood Hazard Area as indicated on a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the developer shall provide an Elevation Certificate in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program. This form must be completed by a lands surveyor or civil engineer licensed in the State of California.
12. All final property corners shall be installed prior to final occupancy.
13. All areas of the project shall be protected against erosion by hydro seeding or landscaping.
14. All construction refuse shall be separated (i.e. concrete, asphalt concrete, wood gypsum board, etc.) and removed from the project in accordance with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element.
15. Clear blackline mylars and paper prints of record drawings, signed by the engineer of record, shall be provided to the City Engineer prior to the final inspection. An electronic autocad drawing file registered to the California State Plane – Zone 5 / NAD83 projected coordinate system, units in survey feet, shall be provided. ****************************************************************************** PASO ROBLES FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES (PRFES) - The applicant shall contact the Department, (805) 227-7560, for compliance with the following conditions:
G. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Prior to the start of construction:
Plans shall be reviewed, approved, and permit issued by PRFES for Underground Fire Line (underground fire line shown on any civil set is for reference only and shall indicate so on each civil page).
Applicant shall provide documentation to PRFES that required fire flows can be provided to meet project demands. Refer to California Fire Code (CFC) Appendix B.
Exhibit B
2. Prior to delivery of combustible materials:
Fire hydrants shall be installed and operative to current, adopted edition of the CFC. Refer to CFC Appendix C & CC.
Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be located on the addressed side of the building and within 150 feet of a fire hydrant, and must not block collector or arterial roadways. Refer to Paso Robles Municipal Code (PRMC).
An all-weather access road sufficient to support fire apparatus weighing up to 75,000 lbs. shall be constructed and maintained for the duration of the construction phase of the project. Refer to CFC Appendix D.
Access roads shall be at least 20’ in width with at least 13’ 6” of vertical clearance. All driveway and access roads shall be 10% or less in slope unless approved by PRFES. Refer to CFC Appendix D.
Truck access road shall be minimum 26’ in width with at least 13’ 6” of vertical clearance. Minimum set-back 15’, maximum 30’. Refer to CFC Appendix D.
Provide temporary turn-around for phased construction streets that exceed 150’ in length. Refer to Paso Robles Standard Details and Specifications.
Project shall provide a secondary access fire road approved by PRFES.
Refer to CFC Appendix D.
3. Provide on address side of building if applicable:
Fire alarm annunciator panel location to be approved by PRFES.
Knox Box key entry box or system.
FDC location and access path must be approved by PRFES.
Minimum 6” high, contrasting background address numbers with location, size, and contrast to be approved by PRFES.
For buildings or group of buildings (five units or more) served by an alley or interior driveway, the numbers or alphabetical designation shall be displayed on a directory or annunciator board, approved by the Fire Marshal, at each driveway or alley entrance. Senior housing, retirement villas, hotel and motel annunciator boards shall be of a Graphic type. The property owner, Homeowner's Association or individual in charge of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the directory.
4. Provide a central station monitored fire sprinkler system for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings that require fire sprinklers in the current, adopted edition of
Exhibit B
the CBC, CFC, and PRMC. Plans shall be reviewed, approved, and permits issued by PRFES for the installation of fire sprinkler and alarm systems.
5. Provide class 1 standpipe system(s) with 2 ½” hose connections to supply water for use by fire department personnel at each floor in accordance to NFPA 14 for all residential, commercial and industrial buildings that are or exceed three (3) stories in height or above 30’. Location shall be at the entrance/exit way of the stairway system.
Travel distance greater than 200’ will compel additional standpipe system(s) in each stairwell.
6. Motorized Gates blocking fire access require a separate PRFES permit, must include PRFES Knox Key Switch access (not CALFIRE), and meet CFC requirements. Refer to CFC Appendix D.
7. Provide permanent turn-around for driveway/access roads that exceed 150’ in length. See Paso Robles Standard Details and Specification Standard.
8. Fire extinguisher placement shall be approved by PRFES.
9. Landscape plant selections shall be fire resistive within 30’ of structures.
10. Landscape trees (including potential crown at maturity) must not project into required vertical clearance of the fire access lanes.
11. Project shall comply with all requirements in current, adopted edition of CFC and PRMC.
12. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy:
Final inspections shall be completed on all underground fire lines, fire sprinkler systems, fire alarm systems and chemical hood fire suppression systems.
A site pre-fire plan shall be submitted and approved by the Fire Marshal.
Contact the Paso Robles Fire Prevention Office for the exact requirements.
A Final Fire Walk-through inspection shall be completed on all buildings.
EROSION CONTROL SHEET INDEX AIR QUALITY CONTROL GENERAL GRADING NOTES GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SPECIAL INSPECTION ITEM OTHER REMARKS NONE REQUIRED STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION ITEM REMARKS NONE REQUIRED CIVIL ENGINEERING EXCAVATION PROJECT DESIGN CRITERIA GOVERNING BUILDING CODE GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS BEARING PRESSURE LATERAL PASSIVE PRESSURE EFP (REST / ACTIVE) FRICTION COEFFICIENT INSPECTOR POOL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING POOL ENGINEERING INC. 1201 N. TUSTIN AVE ANAHEIM, CA 714.630.6100 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT INFORMATION VICINITY MAP PROJECT STATISTICS 1500 150 PSF PCF 60 / 45 PCF 0.25 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MUST BE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONAL PRIOR TO THE FIRST INSPECTION. NO INSPECTIONS CAN BE PERFORMED IF THEY ARE NOT IN PLACE OR HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL. FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL WILL CAUSE INSPECTIONS TO BE DELAYED UNTIL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES ARE FUNCTIONAL 2. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DURING ALL DEMOLITIONS, CONSTRUCTION AND GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 3. THE ADJOINING STREET SHALL BE CLEANED BY SWEEPING TO REMOVE DIRT, DUST, MUD AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 4. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS, PLANTINGS AND FACILITIES ARE IN PLACE. TEMPORARY MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION APPROVALS 5. THE FOLLOWING PERSON SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTING & MONITORING THE APPROVED EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN: JOEL WOODRUFF 805.610.8330 DURING CONSTRUCTION/GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, THE FOLLOWING PARTICULATE (DUST) CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED. THE CONTRACTOR OR BUILDER SHALL BE DESIGNATED TO MONITOR THE DUST CONTROL PROGRAM AND ORDER INCREASED WATERING, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF DUST OFF SITE. THEIR DUTIES SHALL INCLUDE HOLIDAY AND WEEKEND PERIODS WHEN WORK MAY NOT BE IN PROGRESS. THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE APCD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. 1. REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF DISTURBED AREA WHERE POSSIBLE 2. USE OF WATER TRUCKS OR SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES TO PREVENT AIRBORNE DUST FROM LEAVING THE SITE. INCREASED WATERING FREQUENCY WOULD BE REQUIRED WHENEVER WIND SPEEDS EXCEED 15 MPH. RECLAIMED (NONPOTABLE) WATER SHOULD BE USED WHENEVER POSSIBLE; 3. ALL DIRT STOCK-PILE AREAS SHOULD BE SPRAYED DAILY AS NEEDED; 4. ALL ROADWAYS, DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, ETC TO BE PAVED SHALL BE COMPLETED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE; AND 5. BUILDING PADS SHALL BE LAID AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER GRADING UNLESS SEEDING OR SOIL BINDERS ARE USED. DURING INITIAL GRADING/SCRAPING, BURNING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED, OR IF NO ALTERNATIVE IS AVAILABLE, THE APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN A BURN PERMIT FORM THE APCD AND COUNTY FIRE/CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY, AND COMPLY WITH ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY THESE AGENCIES. 1. ANY AND ALL SITE WORK AND GRADING SHALL BE ACCORDANCE WITH CBC CHAPTER 18 AND CBC APPENDIX J AND ANY APPLICABLE LOCAL ORDINANCES. 2. A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE GRADING PERFORMED IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND IS SUITABLE TO SUPPORT THE INTENDED STRUCTURE(S). 3. THE BOTTOM OF ALL EXCAVATIONS SHOULD BE OBSERVED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCESSING OR PLACING FILL. 4. AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK DONE WITHIN A RIGHT OF WAY MAINTAINED BY THE PRESIDING JURISDICTION. 5. MAXIMUM CUT AND FILL SLOPE TO BE 2:1 6. THE EXISTING GROUND SURFACE SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR GRADING BY REMOVING ALL VEGETATION, TREES, LARGE ROOTS, DEBRIS, NON-COMPLYING FILL, AND ALL OTHER ORGANIC MATERIAL. VOIDS CREATED BY REMOVAL OF SUCH MATERIALS SHOULD NOT BE BACKFILLED UNTIL THE UNDERLYING SOIL HAS BEEN OBSERVED BY A SOILS ENGINEER. 7. FILL AND BACKFILL SHOULD BE PLACED AT NEAR OPTIMUM MOISTURE IN LAYERS WITH LOOSE THICKNESS NOT GREATER THAN EIGHT (8) INCHES AND COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY OBTAINABLE BY TEST METHOD ASTM-D 1557 AND CERTIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER. 8. IMPORT SOILS USED TO RAISE SITE GRADE SHOULD BE EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAT ON-SITE SOILS IN STRENGTH, EXPANSION AND COMPRESSIBILITY CHARACTERISTICS. IMPORT SOIL CAN BE EVALUATED BUT WILL NOT BE PRE-QUALIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. FINAL COMMENTS ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE IMPORT SOIL WILL BE PROVIDED AFTER THE MATERIAL IS STOCKPILED AT THE PROJECT SITE. 9. FINAL SITE GRADE SHOULD BE SUCH THAT ALL WATER IS DIVERTED AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE(S) A MINIMUM OF 5% FOR 10 FEET. WATER SHALL NOT POND. ALL SURFACE WATER SHOULD BE DIRECTED INTO APPROVED DISCHARGE STRUCTURES. 10. ACCESS ROAD/DRIVEWAYS: ANY ROAD GRADE IN EXCESS OF 12% SHALL BE PAVED WITH NON-SKID MATERIAL. GRADE FOR FIRE ACCESS SHALL NOT EXCEED 20% 11. ALL NON-PERMITTED FILL SHALL BE REMOVED BY CONTRACTOR. 12. ELECTRICAL, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND OTHER UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDERGROUND IN AN APPROVED METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS REGULATION APPLIES TO UTILITIES ON SITES THAT ARE 5 ACRES OR LESS AND SERVING NEW STRUCTURES AND/OR NEW UTILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. 13. UTILITY TRENCH BACKFILL SHOULD BE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THIS REPORT RELATING TO MINIMUM COMPACTION STANDARDS. IN GENERAL, SERVICE LINES INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINES MAY BE BACKFILLED WITH NATIVE SOILS COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY. BACKFILL OF OFF SITE SERVICE LINES WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 14. LINED DRAINAGE SWALES AND DOWN DRAINS SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT THE TOPS OF CUT AND FILL SLOPES TO DIVERT DRAINAGE AWAY FROM SLOPE FACES. 15. FILL SLOPES SHOULD BE KEYED AND BENCHED INTO FIRM NATURAL GROUND WHEN THE EXISTING SLOPE TO RECEIVE FILL IS 5:1 OR STEEPER, HORIZONTAL TO VERTICAL. THE KEYS SHOULD BE TILTED INTO THE SLOPE A MINIMUM OF 2%; SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF ONE EQUIPMENT WIDTH AND SHOULD BE MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET DEEP ON THE OUTSIDE EDGE. ALL KEYS AND BENCHES SHOULD BE OBSERVED AND VERIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. WHERE SPECIAL INSPECTION OR TESTING IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1704, 1707, OR 1708 THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL PREPARE A STATEMENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1705 FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE PERMIT APPLICANT. WHERE STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION OR TESTING IS REQUIRED BY SECTION 1709.4, THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL PREPARE A STATEMENT OF STRUCTURAL OBSERVATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1709.4 FOR SUBMITTAL BY THE PERMIT APPLICANT. COMMERICAL POOL PLANS FOR Ravine Waterpark 2301 Airport Rd. Paso Robles, CA RAVINE WATERPARK 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA 025-433-012 805-781-3133 OWNER PROJECT ADDRESS APN PHONE LOT SIZE AREA OF DISTURBANCE MAX DEPTH FILL MAX DEPTH CUT 16.16 ACRES 9,060 SQ. FT 0 FT 6 FT CONSTRUCT GUNITE SWIMMING POOL EXCAVATION QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE ESTIMATED FOR BUILDING DEPARTMENT FEE DETERMINATIONS. SHRINKAGE AND SCARIFICATION LOSSES CAN AND WILL VARY BASED UPON SOIL CONDITIONS AND VEGETATION TYPES. CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES PRIOR TO BID. EXCLUDING BUILDING FOOTPRINT: CUT: 340 CU YDS FILL: 0 CU YDS NET FILL: 0 CU YDS 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM WITH THE: 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) 2022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE (CRC) 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC) 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (CEnC) 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE (CGBSC) COUNTY ORDINANCE TITLE 19 COUNTY ORDINANCE TITLE 22 (PLANING-INLAND) COUNTY ORDINANCE TITLE 23 (PLANING-COASTAL) 2021 UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE 2. THESE NOTES SHALL APPLY TO ALL DRAWINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR SHOWN, FEATURES OF CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ARE TYPICAL AND THEY SHALL APPLY GENERALLY THROUGHOUT SIMILAR CONDITIONS. ALL OMISSIONS OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE WORKING DRAWINGS AND/OR GENERAL NOTES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK SO INVOLVED. SPECIFICATIONS WHICH REFERENCE CONDITIONS NOT IN THIS SCOPE OF THE PROJECT MAY BE OMITTED. 3. ALL WORK AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE BUILDING CODES AND OTHER RULES, REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS IN ALL CASES TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ANYONE SUPPLYING LABOR AND/OR MATERIALS TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE AND THE DRAWINGS. 4. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. DIMENSIONS SHOWN SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DRAWING SCALE OR PROPORTION. LARGE SCALE DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SMALLER SCALE DRAWINGS. 5. THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, THEY DO NOT INDICATE METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT WORK AND SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTIONS MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES AND PROCEDURES. OBSERVATION VISITS TO THE SITE BY FIELD REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SHALL NOT INCLUDE INSPECTIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE MEASURES OR THE CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES REQUIRED FOR SAME, WHICH ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. ANY SUPPORT SERVICES PERFORMED BY THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE DISTINGUISHED FROM CONTINUOUS AND DETAILED INSPECTION SERVICES PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN QUALITY CONTROL AND IN ACHIEVING CONFORMANCE WITH CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND THEREFORE THEY DO NOT GUARANTEE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUPERVISION OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. CONTRACTOR HEREBY GUARANTEES TO THE OWNER AND THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER THAT ALL MATERIALS, FIXTURES, AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED TO THE PROJECT ARE NEW UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. CONTRACTOR ALSO WARRANTS THAT ALL WORK WILL BE GOOD QUALITY AND FREE FROM ANY FAULTS AND DEFECTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION, UNLESS A GREATER WARRANTY OF GUARANTEE IS REQUIRED BY THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 7. ANYONE SUPPLYING LABOR AND/OR MATERIALS TO THE PROJECT SHALL CAREFULLY EXAMINE ALL SUBSURFACE TO RECEIVE WORK. ANY CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO WORK SHALL BE REPORTED IN WRITING TO THE CONTRACTOR AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL(S) OF RECORD PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK. COMMENCEMENT OF WORK SHALL IMPLY ACCEPTANCE OF ALL SUBSURFACE. 8. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR DEPRESSED SLABS CURB, FINISHES, TEXTURES, CLIPS, GROUNDS, ETC., NOT SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. 9. ANY MATERIALS STORED AT THE SITE SHALL BE COMPLETELY SUPPORTED FREE OF THE GROUND, COVERED AND OTHERWISE PROTECTED TO AVOID DAMAGE FROM THE ELEMENTS. 10. MORE DETAILED INFORMATION SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LESSER DETAILED INFORMATION. SPECIFICATIONS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DRAWINGS. 11. GRADING PLANS, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, ROAD AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CONSIDERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REMOVE OR DISBURSE ANY EXCESS MATERIAL FROM PROJECT SITE. 13. 18.05.040 - APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ON JOB. ONE (1) SET OF APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO THE PERMIT APPLICANT SHALL BE KEPT AT THE SITE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR WORK AT ALL TIMES DURING WHICH THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY IS IN PROGRESS AND SHALL BE AVAILABLE AND OPEN TO INSPECTION BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. ANY DEVIATION FROM THE STAMPED OR APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 18.05.040.D. 14. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS MUST HAVE A FILE WITH THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, A LIST OF ALL SUCH CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS WITH APPROPRIATE CURRENT BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBERS. 15. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL VESTIBULES, CLOSETS, COLUMNS, PROJECTIONS, RECESSES, OR OTHER ADJACENT AREAS WITHIN SCHEDULED ARE SHALL HAVE FINISHES AS SCHEDULED FOR THE RESPECTIVE SPACES IN WHICH THEY OCCUR. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL SETBACKS, EASEMENTS, CONTOURS, AND BUILDING PAD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY TIE-INS AT STREET AND POINT OF CONNECTIONS AT BUILDING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 18. IF A PROJECT SOILS REPORT IS REQUIRED OR SUPPLIED, A COPY OF THE REPORT SHALL BE ON SITE DURING FOUNDATION INSPECTION. 19. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED AT THE TIME OF FOUNDATION INSPECTION WITH THE MARK OF A LICENSED SURVEYOR. 20. ELECTRICAL NOTE: ALL BURIED CONDUIT SHALL BE OF SCH. 40 PVC BURIED WITH A MINIMUM COVER DEPTH AS GIVEN IN TABLE 300.5 CEC 680.11 21. BONDING NOTE: #8 UNINSULATED COPPER WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT LEAST 6" BELOW THE SUBFRAME OF THE DECK AND 18-24" FROM THE INSIDE WALL OF THE POOL. BOND ALL REQUIRED ITEMS TO THIS WIRE. NEC 680.26 GROUNDING NOTE: ALL UNDERWATER LIGHTING FIXTURES, JUNCTION BOXES, METAL TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURES, BE GROUNDED PER NEC ARTICLE 250 AND ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS IN VARIOUS SECTIONS OF ARTICLE 680. 22. 22. 680.11 UNDERGROUND WIRING SHALL COMPLY WITH 680.11 (A) THROUGH (C) (A) UNDERGROUND WIRING WITHIN 5FT. HORIZONTALLY FROM THE INSIDE WALL OF THE POOL SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE FOLLOWING WIRING METHODS SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUITABLE FOR THE CONDITIONS IN THESE LOCATIONS: 1. RIGID METAL CONDUIT 2. INTERMEDIATE METAL CONDUIT 3. RIGID POLYVINYL CHLORIDE CONDUIT 4. REINFORCED THERMOSETTING RESIN CONDUIT 5. JACKETED TYPE MG CABLE THAT IS LISTED FOR BURIAL USE 6. LIQUIDTIGHT FLEXIBLE NONMETALLIC CONDUIT LISTED FOR DIRECT BURIAL USE 7. LIQUIDTIGHT FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT LISTED FOR DIRECT BURIAL USE. (A) WIRING UNDER POOLS. UNDERGROUND WIRING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED UNDER THAT POOL UNLESS THIS WIRING IS NECESSARY TO SUPPLY POOL EQUIPMENT PERMITTED BY THIS ARTICLE. (B) MINIMUM COVER REQUIREMENTS. MINIMUM COVER DEPTHS SHALL BE AS GIVEN IN TABLE 300.5 POOL CALCS. 10' X 13' CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAD 38'-4" X 28'-1" X 65'-4" PERIMETER: 173' S/AREA: 1825 SQ, FT GALLONS: 50,000 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE International Swimming Pool and Spa Code 2021 (ISPSC 2021) CONSULTANTS THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL REVIEW THE EXCAVATION AND PROVIDE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE SWIMMING POOL DESIGN PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF POOL STEEL/REBAR. SPA CALCS. 14' X 14' PERIMETER: 44' S/AREA: 153 SQ, FT GALLONS: 4,000 POOL SPA ELEC, AND PROPANE LINE SCOPE OF WORK 3D RENDERINGS SOILS ABOVE GRADE ENGINEERING 245 HIGUERA ST. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 805-540-5115 1- 11 TITLE SHEET 2- 11 EXISTING AREA MAP 3- 11 EXISTING SITE PLAN 4- 11 DEMOLITION PLAN 5- 11 SITE PLAN 6- 11 C-1.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE 7- 11 CABANA DETAILS 8- 11 POOL/SPA DETAILS 9- 11 3D RENDERINGS 10- 21 POOL ENGINEERING 11- 21 POOL ENGINEERING DETAILS CONCRETE - 1,710 SQ. FT 1 OWNER INFORMATION RAVINE OPCO LLC 1304 GARDEN ST. SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 805-781-3133 OWNER ADDRESS PHONE 1 DESIGNER CARECRAFT POOLS 710 FIERO LN. #21 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401 805-439-3040 1 TITLE SHEET 710 Fiero Ln #21 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-439-3040 Office [email protected] SHEET NUMBER 1-11 RAVINE OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: SHEET TITLE: WATERPARK DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS. 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA APN: 025-433-012 PMRT: 1/6/2026 REV. REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION DATE JOSH PETERSEN CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53 DATE: APPROVAL STAMP 1/6/2026 DESIGNED BY: REV. 1 PLAN CHECK 1-6-26 Exhibit
C
FILTER BUILDING
ACTIVE POOL
WAVE POOL
LAZY RIVER
BRIDGE
RESTROOM
ENTRY
SHADE
LAWN
GATHERING AREA BAR
FILTER YARD RESTROOM
FILTER YARD
RESTROOM
CONCESSION
STAND CONCRETE DINING AREA
RETAIL CONCRETE EATING AREA
ENTRY BUILDING
BRIDGE
PERGOLA
DOUBLE
SLIDES
PERGOLA
ENTRY
INFO
BAR
BRIDGE
CONCESSION
STAND
PUMP
HWY 46
AIRPORT ROAD
HUERHUERO CREEK
FILTER
YARD
STOP
STOP
LAZY RIVER
TICKET OFFICE
COVERED
GATHERING AREA COVERED
SEASONAL
BOARDWALK
SHADE
STRUCTURE
PERGOLA
TICKET OFFICE
STORE ROOM
CONCESSIONS
STORE ROOM
STORE ROOM
WAVE MOTOR
ROOM
STORE ROOM
DECK
RESTROOM
TUBE
CORRAL
FIRST
AID
SCALE:
0 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS - RAVINE WATER PARK
1" = 50'-0"
25 60 100
PROJ #: 2022-126
DRWN BY: JD/HS
CHK'D BY: JMD
DATE SUBMITTAL
9/13/2023 MAJOR DEV PLANNING DESIGN DEVELOPMENT RAVINE WATER PARK EXPANSION 2301 AIRPORT ROAD, PASO ROBLES, CA JAMES M. DUFFY
C-30770
7.31.2025
RENEWAL
L I C E N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T E C T
S T A T E
O
F
A
L
I
F
O R N I A
C
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
THESE DRAWINGS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE
AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF TEN OVER STUDIO, INC.
THE DESIGN AND INFORMATION REPRESENTED ON
THESE DRAWINGS ARE EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE PROJECT
INDICATED AND SHALL NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR
OTHERWISE REPRODUCED WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN
PERMISSION OF TEN OVER STUDIO, INC.
COPYRIGHT 2022
2-11
EXISTING SITE
PLAN - AREA
MAP
PROJECT AREA
1049.22’
711.07’
39.42’
432.12’
452.23’
305.71’
47.70’ 331.26’
333.36’
333.36’
309.87’
45.44’
221.41’
Exhibit C
/// ///
/// ///
745
741
742
743
744
746
747
742
743
745
742
743
744
746
747
741
742
743
743 743 743
742 EXISTING SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1' EXISTING PALM TREES TO BE RELOCATED TO PLANTERS AT SPA POOL EQ EXISTING BAR GATE 36" DIA OAK'R-DL 17" DIA 5'R-DL PALM 18" PALM 24" PALM 20" PALM EXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE TROUGH OLIVE MULTI TRUNK 12" PALM EXISTING SHADE TENT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING FACADE TO BE REMOVED 13" OAK 32" OAK 20" OAK SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE SAWCUT, DEMO AND REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE FOR PLUMBING SAWCUT, DEMO AND REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE FOR PLUMBING EXISTING NATURAL LAWN AREA TO REMAIN EXISTING FACADE EXISTING SLIDE SUPPORT (TYP.) EXISTING CHAIN FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN 24" DIA OAK' R-DL 22" DIA OAK'R-DL 741.98 TEE 16" DIA 6'R-DL PALM EXISTING ELEC 1.8 X0.8 EXISTING SITE PLAN 710 Fiero Ln #21 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-439-3040 Office [email protected] SHEET NUMBER 3-11 RAVINE OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: SHEET TITLE: WATERPARK DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS. 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA APN: 025-433-012 PMRT: 1/6/2026 REV. REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION DATE JOSH PETERSEN CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53 DATE: APPROVAL STAMP 1/6/2026 DESIGNED BY: REV. 1 PLAN CHECK 1-6-26 Exhibit
C
3'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" R
R
R
R R R R R R J J J J J J J J J J 3'-6"
/// ///
/// ///
745
741
742
743
744
746
747
742
743
745
742
743
744
746
747
741
742
743
743 743 743
742 EXISTING BAR GATE CABANAS 36" DIA OAK'R-DL 13" OAK 32" OAK 20" OAK 17" DIA 5'R-DL PALM 18" PALM 24" PALM EXISTING CONCRETE TROUGH 36' 32' 28'-6" PLANTER 20'-11" PLANTER0" +16" 14' 65'-4" 16'-812" 12' 38'-4" 4' 4' EXISTING NATURAL LAWN AREA TO REMAIN 6' 7'-612" 10' 13'-6" 12' 37' DEMOLITION PLAN 1/8" = 1' DEMO LIST S/N DESCRIPTION 1 DEMO SHADE TENT SAWCUT AND DEMO EXISTING CONCRETE 2 DEMO FACADE 45 DEMO NATURAL LAWN EXISTING PALM TREES TO BE RELOCATED TO PLANTERS AT SPA POOL EQ 20" PALMEXISTING CONCRETE TO REMAIN OLIVE MULTI TRUNK 12" PALM EXISTING FACADE EXISTING SLIDE SUPPORT (TYP.) EXISTING CHAIN FENCE TO REMAIN EXISTING WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN 3 SAWCUT, DEMO AND REPLACE EXISTING CONCRETE FOR PLUMBING 1 2 3 3 4 +8" +8" PLANTER PLANTER EXISTING PLANTER EXISTING PLANTER EXISTING PLANTER 24" DIA OAK' R-DL 22" DIA OAK'R-DL 6'-8" CABANAS FUTURE CABANAS FUTURE DEMOLITION PLAN 710 Fiero Ln #21 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-439-3040 Office [email protected] SHEET NUMBER 4-11 RAVINE OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: SHEET TITLE: WATERPARK DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS. 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA APN: 025-433-012 PMRT: 1/6/2026 REV. REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION DATE JOSH PETERSEN CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53 DATE: APPROVAL STAMP 1/6/2026 DESIGNED BY: REV. 1 PLAN CHECK 1-6-26 CABANAS Exhibit
C
3'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" R
R
R
R R R R R R J J J J J J J J J J 3'-6"
/// ///
/// ///
745
741
742
743
744
746
747
742
743
745
742
743
744
746
747
741
742
743
743 743 743
742 EXISTING BAR GATE CABANAS 36" DIA OAK'R-DL 13" OAK 32" OAK 20" OAK 17" DIA 5'R-DL PALM 18" PALM 24" PALM EXISTING CONCRETE TROUGH 36' 32' 28'-6" PLANTER 20'-11" 0" +16" 14' 65'-4" 16'-812" 12' 38'-4" PLANTER EXISTING NATURAL LAWN AREA TO REMAIN 6' 7'-612" 10' 13'-6" 37' TRANSFER WALL SITE PLAN 1/8" = 1' POOL EQ 20" PALM EXISTING CONCRETE OLIVE MULTI TRUNK 12" PALM EXISTING FACADE EXISTING SLIDE SUPPORT (TYP.) EXISTING CHAIN FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE +8" 12' NEW CONCRETE EXISTING PLANTER EXISTING PLANTER EXISTING PLANTER PLANTER RELOCATED 18" PALM RELOCATED 18" PALM 13' 10' 60'-8" 3'-4" 4' 4' EXISTING RAIL FENCE EXISTING WOOD FENCE 24" DIA OAK' R-DL 22" DIA OAK'R-DL EXISTING WOOD FENCE SPA EMERGENCY SHUT OFF SWITCH 12' ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL i. Without any abrupt level changes exceeding 12" ii. At least 48" in width. iii. Cross Slope does not exceed 2% and slope in the direction of travel is less than 5% iv. Surface is stable, firm, and slip resistant. v. Free of overhanging obstructions to 80" minimum, and protruding objects greater that 4" projection from wall & above 27" & less than 80" vi. I understand that if the primary accessible path of travel is found not to be as indicated, significant delays may result. =BONDING LOCATIONS =LIGHTS 6'-8" LIFE RING AND ROPE, SAFETY SIGNS HOSE BIBS HOSE BIBS BODY HOOK ATTACHED TO POLE CABANAS FUTURE CABANAS FUTURE ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL SEE SHEET 2-21 1 1 1 SITE PLAN 710 Fiero Ln #21 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-439-3040 Office [email protected]
SHEET NUMBER
5-11 RAVINE OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: SHEET TITLE: WATERPARK DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS. 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA APN: 025-433-012 PMRT: 1/6/2026 REV. REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION DATE JOSH PETERSEN CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53 DATE: APPROVAL STAMP 1/6/2026 DESIGNED BY: REV. 1 PLAN CHECK 1-6-26 CABANAS Exhibit
C
EXISTING
BUILDING
ELEC.BOX
"MINIGOLF
120V-208V" ELEC.BOX
"MINIGOLF
PUMP
MOTOR"
FACADE
FACADE
CONCRETE
TROUGH
BAR
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
CONCRETE
LAWN
AREA
FACADE
SHADE
STRUCTURE
MINI GOLF
ENTRACE
SLIDE
SUPPORT
(TYP.)
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
(741.86 FS)
741.84 TG
(741.78 FS)
(741.73 FS)
(741.60 FS)
741.55 POOL
(741.48 FS)
741.46 TG
(741.46 FS)
741.43 FS
741.18 FG
741.50 POOL
741.50 FS
741.47 TG 741.25 FG
(741.27 FS)
(741.29 FS)
(741.41 FS)
741.50 POOL
(741.47 TG)
EXISTING 18" SD
(±736.0 INV)
741.45 TG
471.45 TG
5:1
5:1
5:1
5:1
741.35 TG
ZONE A FEMA
FLOOD ZONE
741.15 TG
741.43 FS
741.18 FG
741.43 FS
741.18 FG
1 1
2 2
10 11
10 11
9 6
8 7
7 7
7 7
7 6
6 6
6 6
4 6
1 1
4 2
4 2
4 2
1 1
POOL EQUIPMENT
PAD
CABANNA
TYP
1 2 3
3 3
4 12
12 12
6 DESIGNED:
SHEET:
DATE:
JOB NUMBER:
PLOT BY: ZechSzwabowskiPLOT DATE: Jan 08, 2026 - 2:09pm Drawing name: N:\2025\25174-Ravine Water Park\Civil\Condocs\CUP\25174-C1-PGD.dwg ENGINEER OF RECORD:
DATE: NO. REVISION DATE
C-1.0
DRAWN:
SJS NOTE SHEET
ZTS
25174
January 8, 2026 RAVINE WATER PARK
AGENCY APPROVAL:
APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK INFORMATION:
CUT 340 CY
FILL 0 CY
NET 340 CY <CUT>
MAX DEPTH OF CUT 7.0 FT
MAX DEPTH OF FILL 0.0 FT
AREA OF DISTURBANCE 0.20 AC
NOTE: THE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR BONDING AND ESTIMATING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE CALCULATED FROM APPROXIMATE SUBGRADE TO EXISTING SURFACE.
THE QUANTITIES DO NOT TAKE CERTAIN FACTORS INTO ACCOUNT, INCLUDING, BUT
NOT LIMITED TO SUBGRADE, AREA OF OVEREXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION, SHRINKAGE AND EXPANSION OF THE SOIL. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CALCULATING EARTHWORK QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES.
SURVEY INFORMATION:
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED SEPTEMBER 2025
BY ABOVE GRADE ENGINEERING
BENCHMARK: THE BASIS OF ELEVATIONS USED FOR THIS SURVEY IS A SET MAG NAIL IN THE CONCRETE WALK SHOWN AS POINT NUMBER 11 HEREON HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 744.97 FEET ASSUMED.
TEL COMMUNICATION CONDUIT
ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
TEL FIBER OPTICAL CONDUIT
E ELECTRICAL CONDUIT
G GAS LINE
S SEWER LINE
W WATER LINE
SD
W WATER LINE
340 INDEX CONTOUR
INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
FENCE
347.20 ELEVATION
SD STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN
GRADED SWALE
JT JOINT TRENCH
LEGEND:
SS SANITARY SEWER
E
PROPERTY LINE
SAWCUT
TG TOP OF GRATE
EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT
2% SLOPE & DIRECTION OF FLOW
S SLOPE
L LENGTH
INV INVERT
GB GRADE BREAK
(E) EXISTING
FS FINISH SURFACE
EG EXISTING GROUND
FG FINISH GRADE
TC TOP OF CURB
SDMH
HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHELENE
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
RIM RIM OR TOP OF FRAME HOLDING GRATE
TW TOP OF WALL
342
G GAS LINE
JT JOINT TRENCH
340 INDEX CONTOUR
342 INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
(347.20) ELEVATION
ABBREVIATIONS:
FL FLOW LINE SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
(2%) SLOPE & DIRECTION OF FLOW
PROPOSED EXISTING
STORMWATER COMPLIANCE SUMMARY:
NEW: 2,861 S.F.
REPLACED: 2,037 S.F.
TOTAL: 4,898 S.F.
THE PROPOSED POOLS ARE OPEN AND UNCOVERED RETENTION FACILITY AND IS NOT CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS OF THE PURPOSED OF DETERMINING THE POST CONSTRUCTION THRESHOLD. THEREFORE THE PROJECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD FOR POST-CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.
SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION NOTES:
SITE WORK CONSTRUCTION NOTES-GRADING AND DRAINAGE
1 EXISTING SITE FEATURES TO REMAIN.
2 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION.
3 CONCRETE FLATWORK.
4 SAW CUT AND REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE.
5 TREE TO BE RELOCATED.
6 INSTALL ALL 12" NYLOPLAST DRAIN INLET .
7 INSTALL 8" PVC SD PIPE.
8 CONNECT TO EXISTING 18" STORM DRAIN.
9 INSTALL ADS ENVIROHOOD PRIOR TO OUTLET.
10 APPROXIMATE DAYLIGHT LOCATION.
11 CRITICAL ROOT ZONE.
12 FUTURE CABANAS, NOT A PART
#
( IN FEET )
1 INCH = FT.
10 5 10
10 0 20 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
Exhibit C
1 PLAN VIEW 1" = 1' 12' 12' 12' 10'-7" 6'-9" 10' 2 ELEVATION 1" = 1' 3 ENGINEERING PREMANUFACTURED CABANA- SAMPLE CUT SHEET PROVIDED 7-11 CABANA DETAILS 710 Fiero Ln #21 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-439-3040 Office [email protected] SHEET NUMBER RAVINE OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: SHEET TITLE: WATERPARK DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS. 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA APN: 025-433-012 PMRT: 1/6/2026 REV. REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION DATE JOSH PETERSEN CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53 DATE: APPROVAL STAMP 1/6/2026 DESIGNED BY: REV. 1 PLAN CHECK 1-6-26 Exhibit
C
BACK WASH OPEN SIGHT DRAIN
WALL SUCTIONS IN POOL AND SPA ARE COVERED BY AQUA STAR 32" CHANNEL DRAINWHICH CONFORMS TO ASME A112.19.8MALL SUCTION OUTLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A COVER WATER AND A TIME SWITCH THATWILL ALLOW ALL PUMPS TO BE SET ORPROGRAMMED TO RUN ONLY DURINGOFF-PEAK ELECTRIC DEMAND PERIODS ENTRAPMETN AVOIDANCE REQUIRMENTSA) ALL SUCTION OUTLETS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHA COVER THAT CONFORMS TO ASME A112.19.8M, A 12 INCH BY 12 INCH DRAIN GRATE OR LARGER, OR AND
APPROVED CHANNEL DRAIN SYSTEMB) 2 SECTION OUTLETS SEPARATED 3 FEET APART
HEATING SYSTEM INFORMATION NOTESA) HEATING SYSTEM CERTIFIED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLIANCE EFFICIENCY REGULATIONS.
B) ON-OFF SWITCH MOUNTED OUTSIDE HEATER.
C) PROVIDE A PERMANENT WEATHERPROOF PLATE
WITH OPERATING INSTRUCTIONSD) ELECTRIC RESISTANCE HEATING NOT ALLOWED.E) CONTINUOUSLY BURNING PILOT LIGHT NOT ALLOWED.F) INSTALL MINIMUM 36" OF PIPE FOR FUTURE SOLAR HEATING CONNECTION.
G) INSTALL DIRECTIONAL INLETS TO MIX WATER.
H) HEATING SYSTEM MUST HAVE A PROGRAMMABLE TIME
SWITCH.
I) PUMP MOTORS SHALL BE MULTI-SPEED
ALL POOL AND SPA LIGHTS GFCI PROTECTED
THERE ARE NO DESIGNS RESEMBLING HUMAN FORMON THE WALLS OR BOTTOM OF THE SPA
HAIR AND LINT STRAINER IS PROVIDED ON THE
SUCTION SIDE OF THE PUMP
SAND FILTER DOES NOT EXCEED 3 GPM/SQ. FT
THERE IS NO DIRECT CONNECTION OF THE SPA, POOL, OR THERE RECIRCULATION SYSTEM WITH THE
SANITARY SEWER OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM
SUMPS AND DRAIN PIPING HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY
TO RECEIVE SPA SYSTEM BACKWASH WITHOUT
OVERFLOWING THE SUMP RECEIVER
HANDHOLD DETAIL SECTION 6-3
OCCUPANT
POOLSPA
LOAD AREA USE
DECK
1879.71 SQ FT153.93 SQ. FT4,270.4 SQ. FT
38 10
284
OCCUPANT LOAD CHART
SECTION 6-6
SECTION 6-9SECTION 6-10
WHITE PLASTER FOR POOL AND SPA
NOTES:
SECTION 6-11
COLORED CONCRETE
DECK CALCS.
4,270.4 sq.ft24" over ex backfill with gravel#4 24" OC80' channel drain100' 3" drain line with surface drains Where the pool decks will be constructed, the rock should be overexcavated as necessary to allow for the placement of a minimumof 12 inches of nonexpansive material, as defined in the "Grading"section of this report. Where soil is present, it should beoverexcavated as necessary to allow for the placement of minimum of24 inches of nonexpansive material. The exposed soil surface should be scarified to a depth of 1 foot, moisture conditions, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density. There should be no need to scarify or recompact in situ rock.
NONEXPANSIVE MATERIAL
DIRT
24"
24" MINIMUM
#4 24" OC
4"
Deck detail per page 16, section 4-7ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL i. Without any abrupt level changes exceeding 12" ii. At least 48" in width.iii. Cross Slope does not exceed 2% and slope in the direction of travel is less than 5%
iv. Surface is stable, firm, and slip resistant.
v. Free of overhanging obstructions to 80" minimum, and protruding objects greater that 4" projection from wall & above 27" & less than 80"
vi. I understand that if the primary accessible path of travel isfound not to be as indicated, significant delays may result.
SECTION 6-1
SECTION 6-2 EQUIPMENT
POOL EQUIPMENT
P1 = POOL FILTRATION PUMP - VSSHP270DV2AF1 = POOL SAND FILTER - SFSM140BW = BACKWASH VALVE - BWVL-MPV-80H1 = POOL HEATER - JXI400NK CP = JANDY POWER CENTER - 6614
IC = INTELLICHEM
SPA EQUIPMENT
P2 = SPA FILTRATION PUMP -VSSHP270DV2AP3 = JET PUMP - VSSHP270DV2AF2 = SPA SAND FILTER - SFSM120BW = BACKWASH VALVE - BWVL-MPV-80H2 = SPA HEATER - JXI400NK IC = INTELLICHEM
WATER LINE
2"
3"
= STANDARD POOL LIGHT
SECTION 6-4
= STEP TRIM TILE
SECTION 6-5
TRIM TILE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 INCHES WIDE TO A MAXIMUM OF 4 INCHES WIDE PLACED PARALLEL TO, AND NOTMORE THAN 1 INCH FROM THE NOSE OF THE STEP.
SECTION 6-7
= NO DIVING MARKERS
= DEPTH TILE - DECK AND WATERLINE
= DRAINS= CHANNEL DRAIN= ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL= HIDDEN LID SECTION 6-8
SIGNS SHALL BE POSTEDA) OCCUPANT LOAD SIGN (4" LETTERS) B) SPA CAUTION SIGN. (THE WORD CAUTION SHALL BE 4" TALL)
C) EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER SIGN
D) ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION PROCEDURES SIGNE) WARNING - NO LIFEGUARD ON DUTY SIGN (4" LETTERS)F) EMERGENCY SHUTOFF SWITCH SIGN (1" LETTERS)
EXITEXIT
EXIT SIGN IN RED ON OTHER SIDE OF GATE FROM STRIKERTACTICAL EXIT SIGN ON STRIKER SIDE OF GATE (BLUE W/BRAILE) SIGNAGE:
SECTION 6-12
R
P/S= POOL SWEEP
= POOL RETURN= SKIMMER= SINGLE JET J
SECTION 6-13 POOL CROSS SECTION: A
1/4" = 1' POOL CALCS. 38'-4" X 28'-1" X 65'-4"
PERIMETER: 173'-5 1/4"S/AREA: 1879.71 SQ, FTGALLONS: 50,000 SPA CALCS.
14' X 14'
PERIMETER: 43'-11 13/16"S/AREA: 153.93 SQ, FTGALLONS: 4,000 OCCUPANT LOAD: 38 OCCUPANT LOAD: 10DECK CALCS.4,270.4 CONCRETE SQ. FTOCCUPANT LOAD: 284 4' 3'-6"
49'-1" 8' 8'-3"
65'-4"
4'
25'-6" 5'-8" 14'
4'
6"
1'-6" 2'-6"
3'-6"
1'-6" 2'-6"
1'-4"
TRANSFER WALL
28'-6"
PLANTER
PLANTER
0"
-5"
-10"
14'
65'-4"
38'-4"
4'
4'
5'-6"
6'
TRANSFER WALL
3'-10" APART
MAIN DRAIN
J
J
J
J
J J
J
J
J
J
3'-10" APART
MAIN DRAIN
3'-6"
4'-0"
4'-0"
3'-10" APART MAIN DRAIN
R
R
R
A
B
B
A
+8"
+8"
18" PALM
18" PALM
POOL CROSS SECTION: B
1/4" = 1'
TRIM TILE
SECTION 6-14
12"
12"
12"
18" 18" 18"
42"
min 28"
max 36"
min 28"
max 36"
min 28"
max 36"
3"
3 BEND HAND RAILS
BONDED WITH #8 WIRE
TRIM TILE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2
INCHES WIDE TO A MORE THAN 1 INCH
FROM THE NOSE OF THE STEP.
POOL STEP DETAIL
1/2" = 1'
POOL PLAN
1/4" = 1'
3 BEND HAND RAILS
BONDED WITH #8 WIRE
3 BEND HAND RAILS
BONDED WITH #8 WIRE
3'-10" APART
MAIN DRAIN = MAIN DRAIN
POOL
DETAILS
710 Fiero Ln #21
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805-439-3040 Office
[email protected]
SHEET NUMBER
8-11
RAVINE
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER NAME:
SHEET TITLE:
WATERPARK
DATE:
PERMIT NUMBER:
THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOTTO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM
OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED
WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS.
2301 AIRPORT RD.
PASO ROBLES, CA
APN: 025-433-012
PMRT:
11/8/2025
REV.
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION DATE
JOSH PETERSEN
CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53
DATE:
APPROVAL STAMP
11/8/2025
DESIGNED BY:
Exhibit
C
3D
RENDERINGS
710 Fiero Ln #21
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805-439-3040 Office
[email protected]
SHEET NUMBER
9-11
RAVINE
OWNER ADDRESS:
OWNER NAME:
SHEET TITLE:
WATERPARK
DATE:
PERMIT NUMBER:
THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOTTO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM
OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED
WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS.
2301 AIRPORT RD.
PASO ROBLES, CA
PMRT:
11/8/2025
REV.
REVISION LOG
DESCRIPTION DATE
JOSH PETERSEN
CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53
DATE:
APPROVAL STAMP
11/8/2025
DESIGNED BY:
Exhibit
C
250061511g
Chll!lb:li:tl!!r J 8ledet1Neh RC...E..
Pool En-;Jl�,,a. ;!fie;.
:Slnll:li.lf.al ai.r.illt.n.11 � �an,::111,0,111 0::.,- '0dll lill l)liXI 10/21/2025
EXISTING CHAIN FENCE ------,.i
EXISTING RAIL FENCE
EXISTING WOOD FENCE------+__,.I
3' 0
.J
0 0
3'-411
PLANTER
EXISTING
PLANTER
20'-11"
..------
---- ---------
-----
/ .....____
-......... / "-
"-
\
\
"- ..-----�-------
"-
"'
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
I
I
.....____
"- I
I"-
I "-
/
"'
/
\
/
\
/ \
\
\
/
/
/
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
EXISTING CONCRETE /
-.,,..--"-,
..... I
\
I
XISTING PLAN,TER
'20" PA
,--v--1
,-�
- )_,,
I c'-
J ......
I \
.J ....
\
> l
( \
I I
\ \
} 12" PALM I
\ \
( EXISTING PLANTER /
\ l
., J '-, /
..... , _/-
'--
10' j
I
\
)
\
/
EXISTING BAR
0 EXISTING FACADE
EXISTING SLIDE
SUPPORT (TYP.)
0 0
1 EXISTING
CONCRETE TROUGH
0 0
,,
'-..
\
I
\
(
\
(
\
I
\
)
\
I
\.
I
\
\
(
\
I
'-
....
'1
'-
, igitally signed by Christopher Biedenbach on 10/21/2025 - 1761030000 - 25-09815-dg /
/
24" OAK
.22"0AK
ENGINEERING
1/8
11 = 1'
OWNER NAME:
RAVINE
WATERPARK
OWNER ADDRESS:
2301 AIRPORT RD.
PASO ROBLES, CA
PERMIT NUMBER:
PMRT:
DESIGNED BY:
710 Fiero Ln #21
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
805-439-3040 Office
[email protected]
11/13/2025
JOSH PETERSEN DATE:
CA CONTRACTOR# 1073966 C53
APPROVAL STAMP
REVISION LOG
REV. DESCRIPTION DATE
THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT
TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM
OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED
WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS.
SHEET TITLE:
POOL
ENGINEERING
SHEET NUMBER
10-11
DATE: 11/13/2025
EXISTING WOOD FENCE------+__,.I
Exhibit C
11-11 POOL ENGINEERING DETAILS 710 Fiero Ln #21 San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 805-439-3040 Office [email protected] SHEET NUMBER RAVINE OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: SHEET TITLE: WATERPARK DATE: PERMIT NUMBER: THESE PLANS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF CARECRAFT POOLS. 2301 AIRPORT RD. PASO ROBLES, CA APN: 025-433-012 PMRT: 1/6/2026 REV. REVISION LOG DESCRIPTION DATE JOSH PETERSEN CA CONTRACTOR # 1073966 C53 DATE: APPROVAL STAMP 1/6/2026 DESIGNED BY: REV. 1 PLAN CHECK 1-6-26 Exhibit
C
Attachment 7
RESOLUTION 26-XXX (B)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES GRANTING AN APPEAL (APL26-01) OVERTURNING THE PLANNING COMMISSIONS APPROVAL OF AMD25-02 - AMENDING CUP00-020/PD0-023 FOR THE RAVINE WATER PARK
DENIAL OF RAVINE NO SPLASH POOL AMENDMENT
2301 AIRPORT ROAD, APN: 025-433-012
WHEREAS, Ravine Waterpark, LLC has applied for AMD25-02/P25-0124, a request for approval for construction of a new recreational no spash” pool within a pre-disturbed area of the site; and WHEREAS, the 16.16 net acre site is located at 2301 Airport Road (See Vicinity Map, Attachment 1); and
WHEREAS, the site has a General Plan land use designation of CS (Commercial Service) and is in the C2- PD (Highway Commercial, Plan Development Overlay) zoning district, where Outdoor Commercial Recreation Facility is conditionally allowed use; and
WHEREAS, the existing approximate 9-acre water park/amusement park at 2301 Airport Road was approved by the Planning Commission on April 13
th via resolution 04-042 for CUP00-020, resolution
04-043 for PD 00-023, and resolution 04-044 for the mitigated negative declaration; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment was reviewed by the Development Review Committee on January 12th, 2026. The Development Review Committee recommended the project to Planning Commission for approval; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on February 10th, 2026, to consider the facts as presented in the staff report prepared for this project, and to accept public testimony regarding this request for a development plan.
WHEREAS, Proceeding the public hearing on February 10th, 2026, the Planning Commission approved Resolution PC 22-017 on a vote of 7-0 to approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit 02-10 (AMD25-02/P25-0124)
WHEREAS, Ranch and Coast Properties, represented by John Erskine, Attorney at Law, Nossaman LLP filed appeal (APL26-01/P26-022) to request the City Council appeal Planning Commissions decision to approve the project
WHEREAS, a duly noticed hearing for the appeal was held on April 7th, 2026 City Council meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.
Attachment 7
Section 2. Based on the information contained in the staff report entitled Ravine Waterpark CUP Amendment Appeal, dated April 7th, 2026), testimony presented during the public hearing, and responses thereto, the City Council hereby finds and determines that:
City Council to provide findings for project denial in the motion Section 3. The City Council hereby denies AMD25-02 attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit A – Project Site Plan
Section 4. This denial shall become effective immediately. Pursuant to Section 21.25.030 of the Paso Robles Municipal Code (PRMC), the determination and order of the City Council, is final and conclusive upon the applicant.
APPROVED this 7
st day of April, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
John R. Hamon, Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Melissa Martin, City Clerk
Exhibit A – Project Site Plan
! " !
#
$% $% !& %%'
(
(
(
(
)
*
+ %,
-"
./&!.#
"
!.-0
1 .%
"%
' 2345*67*3
859*2**
:;<=>? @A@@BC@D E;FGHI? =EJKL MKNOEHI?=PE EQRSLTHPURRQV WJCXJ@A@X PQ=<;ESY:VQGGUGZ ESLUZGESYSV<:PSGR
1 .%
"%
'%,
.-
!. @XACQU;:<;R;<QE[:QL<;<HVSL[MQ \
]
7^*__* _]^2]8*85
.!"`! &!.-" $&"
!. RKSLSE;QFUGZLQ;SUGLR;TPSGRL<aLS;YUMS QGEQ;SRKS:;<:S;RI<aRSG<YS;LRTEU<[UGMb RKSESLUZGQGEUGa<;PQRU<G;S:;SLSGRSE<G RKSLSE;QFUGZLQ;SScMVTLUYSVIa<;RKS:;<=SMR UGEUMQRSEQGELKQVVG<RHSR;QGLaS;;SE<; <RKS;FULS;S:;<ETMSEFURK<TRSc:;SLLF;URRSG :S;PULLU<G<aRSG<YS;LRTEU<[UGMb M<:I;UZKR@A@@ defg hijkljmnkjlh opqmrqshq tqo
uvwxyz{|vy|
}~
}}~
}
~}
~
}
~
}}
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Attachment 8
CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”
1000 SPRING STREET • PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446 • www.prcity.com
AFFIDAVIT
OF MAIL NOTICES
CITY COUNCIL NOTICING
I, Marci Reynoso , employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, California, do hereby certify that the mail notices have been processed as required for the April 7 th City Council Meeting for APL26-
01/P26-0022 on this 24th day of March in the year 2026.
City of El Paso de Robles
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Signed:
Marci Reynoso
Attachment 9
Attachment 10
1000 SPRING STREET • PASO ROBLES, CALIFORNIA 93446 • www.prcity.com
CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES
“The Pass of the Oaks”
AFFIDAVIT OF SITE NOTICES
FOR CITY COUNCIL HEARING
I, Piper Smith , employee of the City of El Paso de Robles, California, do hereby certify that site notices at least 11 inches x 17 inches in size have been posted in a prominent place on the subject property site forthe April 7th City Council Meeting for APL26-01/P26-0022 on this 26th day of March in the year 2026.
City of El Paso de Robles
Community Development Department
Planning Division
Signed:
Piper Smith
From: Amy R. Taylor
To: City Clerk; Council
Cc: Warren Frace; Piper Smith; [email protected]; [email protected]; John Erskine; David J.
Miller
Subject: Agenda Item Q.2 – Appeal of Planning Commission’s Approval of CUP 00-220 and PD 00-023 for Ravine Water Park
Date: Monday, April 6, 2026 5:23:11 PM
Attachments: image001.png
Agenda Item Q.2 – Appeal of Planning Commission’s Approval of CUP 00-220 and PD 00-023 for Ravine Water Park.pdf
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Dear Mayor Hamon and Councilmembers Beal, Bausch, Gregory, and Strong:
The attached is transmitted on behalf of David J. Miller, Esq. for Ranch & Coast Properties. Please contact me should you have any difficulties accessing the attachment.
Thank you,
Amy R. Taylor
Legal Secretary
NOSSAMAN LLP
SUBSCRIBE TO E-ALERTS
nossaman.com
PLEASE NOTE: The information in this e-mail message is confidential. It may also be attorney-client privileged and/or protected from disclosure as attorney work product. If you have received this e-mail message in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, nor disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in it. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you.
70212963
April 7, 2026
City of Paso Robles City Council
600 Nickerson Drive
Paso Robles, CA 93446
[email protected]; [email protected]
Re: Agenda Item Q.2 – Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Approval of CUP 00-220 and PD 00-023 for the Ravine Water Park at 2301 Airport Road Dear Mayor Hamon and Councilmembers Beal, Bausch, Gregory, and Strong:
Our firm represents Ranch & Coast Properties (“Appellant”) in the City of Paso Robles (“City”) with respect to the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit (“CUP”) Number P25-0124/AMD25-02 (“Project”). The Project consists of Ravine Water Park’s (the “Water Park”) proposed new construction of improvements including an 1,825 sq. ft. pool, a 153 sq. ft. spa, and thirteen (13) 144 sq. ft. cabanas, to be served by an expanded bar.
While the Water Park’s proposal is framed as a modest modification of an existing facility, the reality is that the Project represents yet another meaningful intensification and expansion of use of the property that raises significant environmental and land use concerns – concerns that have repeatedly gone unaddressed by the City. For the reasons outlined below, the City’s reliance on categorical exemptions under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) to forego necessary additional environmental analysis is improper. Appellants ask that the requisite additional environmental review be performed, including updated traffic studies and evaluation of the Project’s consistency with the Airport Land Use Plan (“ALUP”).
1. THE CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DOES NOT APPLY DUE TO INTENSIFICATION OF USE.
The Planning Commission’s approval of the Project relied in part on its determination that the Class 1 CEQA exemption for existing facilities applies to the Project. The Class 1 CEQA exemption “consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use.” (CEQA Guidelines,1 § 15301, emphasis added.) Indeed, “[t]he key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of use.” (Ibid., emphasis added.) 1 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Irvine, CA 92612
T
David J. Miller
D
Refer To File # 505096-0002 VIA E-MAIL
City of Paso Robles City Council
April 7, 2026
70212963
The City’s staff report notes that the Class 1 exemption applies because “the Project will not increase the capacity of the existing Ravine Waterpark.” But that is not the calculus required. Rather, the pertinent question is whether the Project will intensify the existing or former use of the facility. The answer, undoubtedly, is that it will; that is precisely what it is designed to achieve. In its January 2026 Project description,2 the Water Park’s consultant, Kirk Consulting, described that the very purpose of the Project as “intended to reinvigorate the park experience and attract renewed interest from both returning and new visitors.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, the Project is designed to attract new and additional returning visitors, who might otherwise not return but for the new attractions.
The Project’s expansion will convert an existing isolated area of the Water Park that is currently used only intermittently for group events into a permanently programmed, highintensity recreational and commercial space. The addition of a dedicated adult pool, spa, thirteen (13) additional cabanas, and expanded bar service is aimed at substantially increasing the frequency, duration, and intensity of use of this portion of the site. This includes increased patron occupancy, food and beverage (including alcohol) service, noise, and operational activity on a daily, rather than occasional, basis.
Courts have consistently held that such changes in operational intensity fall outside the scope of the Class 1 exemption. Because the Project would materially expand the existing use of the Water Park, rather than merely maintain or negligibly modify it, the Class 1 exemption is inapplicable.
2. THE CLASS 3 AND CLASS 11 CEQA EXEMPTIONS ARE BARRED BY THE CUMULATIVE IMPACTS EXCEPTION.
The Planning Commission’s approval of the Project also relies on the Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and Class 11 (Accessory Structures) CEQA exemptions. Even assuming arguendo that the Project fits within either of these exemptions, the City’s reliance on these exemptions is barred by the cumulative impacts exception set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2(b): “All exemption for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.” (Ibid., emphasis added.)
The Project site is located in an area that has experienced, and continues to experience, substantial development and increased activity levels due to previously approved projects. As noted in the initial appeal letter and recognized in the staff report, the City has approved numerous prior expansions, including numerous parking expansions and new attractions. Each approval relied on the 2003 traffic study that estimated 234 daily trips generated. Those trips, however, were based on an initial estimate of “up to 700” daily visitors (see Attachment 1), and not the 1,400-2,500 daily visitors for the current Water Park, let alone the additional visitors that the Project is designed to attract. These prior approvals have already contributed to increased traffic congestion, circulation challenges, and related environmental effects in the surrounding area.
2 The January 2026 Project Description was included as an Exhibit to the February 10, 2026 Planning Commission Agenda Report, which is included as Attachment 2 for City Council Agenda Item Q.2.
City of Paso Robles City Council
April 7, 2026
70212963
When considered together with these past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, the proposed intensification of the Water Park use will contribute to cumulative traffic and operational impacts. The addition of a new adult-oriented amenity and expanded bar service is reasonably expected (even designed) to attract additional visitors, alter peak usage patterns, and increase vehicle trips to and from the site.
Because there is a reasonable probability that the Project’s incremental effects will be cumulatively considerable, the use of the Class 3 and 11 categorical exemptions is prohibited.
3. TRAFFIC IMPACTS MUST BE EVALUATED THROUGH APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW.
Given the anticipated increase in visitation and changes in operational characteristics generated by the combination of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, the Project’s traffic impacts must finally be meaningfully analyzed. This includes, at a minimum:
Trip generation associated with the new amenities;
Peak hour traffic impacts and level of service at affected intersections; On-site circulation and parking demand; and
Potential spillover effects into the surrounding neighborhood.
Reliance on a categorical exemption improperly forecloses this necessarily analysis and deprives decision-makers and the public of critical information regarding the Project’s, and prior projects’, impacts. The City must finally undertake this important analysis to determine the true impacts that expansion of the Water Park usage is having.
4. CONSISTENCY WITH THE AIRPORT LAND USE PLAN MUST BE ADDRESSED.
In addition to the necessary traffic analysis, the City must evaluate the Project’s consistency with the ALUP. Staff contends that such analysis is not necessary because the Project is not a “new attraction” that will generate additional visitors to the Water Park. The problem with staff’s conclusion, however, is that it relies on the Water Park’s own characterization of the Project – a characterization that is directly contradicted by the Water Park’s technical consultant, who correctly notes that the Project is designed to increase usage by both returning and new visitors.
As described above, the Project would convert an intermittently used event space into a permanently programmed, adult-oriented recreational area featuring a pool, spa, new cabanas, and expanded food and beverage service. This is not passive or incidental change. It is a fundamental shift in how this isolated portion of the site operates, one that will increase occupant load, extend durations of stay, and introduce new peak activity periods. These changes constitute a clear intensification of use.
ALUP consistency requirements are triggered not only by changes in land use designations, but also by increases in the intensity of existing uses, particularly where such increases may affect population exposure to airport-related noise, safety risks, or overflight
City of Paso Robles City Council
April 7, 2026
70212963
conditions. The introduction of a dedicated adult pool and bar area is reasonably expected to attract additional patrons and concentrate people in outdoor areas for longer periods of time, thereby increasing the number of persons exposed within the airport influence area.
Because the Project would increase the intensity of use and the number of people onsite, the City is required to evaluate consistency with the applicable ALUP and, if necessary, refer the Project to the Airport Land Use Commission. The failure to do so is a legally significant procedural and substantive defect in the City’s land use and environmental review of the Water Park expansion.
5. CONCLUSION.
For the foregoing reasons, the City’s reliance on the Class 1, 3, and 11 categorical exemptions under CEQA is not supported by substantial evidence. The Proposed CUP amendment represents a meaningful intensification of use in an already impacted area and may contribute to cumulatively significant environmental effects, particularly with respect to traffic impacts.
Accordingly, the City must set aside the Planning Commission’s reliance on the Class 1, 3, and 11 exemptions and prepare the appropriate level of supplemental environmental review to fully evaluate the Project’s impacts and ensure compliance with CEQA and applicable land use regulations, including the ALUP.
Thank you very much for your review and consideration of our appeal.
David J. Miller
Nossaman LLP
Enclosure
cc: Warren Frace, Community Development Director
Piper Smith, Assistant Planner
Ranch & Coast Properties
John P. Erskine, Esq. j
70212963
ATTACHMENT 1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
CENTRAL COAST REGION
STAFF REPORT FOR REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 2004
Prepared on November 1, 2004
ITEM: 10
SUBJECT: LOW THREAT CASES
DISCUSSION
Low Threat and General Discharge Cases
General Low Threat NPDES Permit:
Avila Valley Hot Springs, San Luis Obispo
County [Matt Thompson 805/549-3159]
Staff enrolled Avila Valley Hot Springs, 250 Avila
Beach Drive, San Luis Obispo County, under the
General NPDES Permit for Discharges with Low
Threat to Water Quality (Low Threat General
Permit) on September 29, 2004. Hot mineral water
from an onsite well is run through a small soaking
pool, and used to heat a large freshwater
swimming pool. Approximately 37,500 gallons
per day of waste mineral water is aerated for 1 to 2
hours in a 3,000-gallon tank prior to discharge to
an unnamed intermittent creek (from Gragg
Canyon) tributary to San Luis Obispo Creek.
Aeration is intended to cool the water and
minimize formation of unionized ammonia in the
discharge.
Enrollment under the Low Threat General Permit
requires Sycamore Mineral Springs to comply with
Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 01-119
(MRP). The MRP been modified specifically for
the discharge, and includes quarterly monitoring of
effluent pH, temperature, total and unionized
ammonia, sulfur, chlorine, salts, total and fecal
coliform, zinc, and copper. We intend to monitor
unionized ammonia concentrations closely.
Should the concentration of unionized ammonia
ever exceed 0.025 mg/L (as N), a limit specified in
the Basin Plan, we will request that Avila Valley
Hot Springs immediately take additional measures
to reduce or eliminate ammonia from the
discharge.
General Statewide Waste Discharge
Requirements Order No. 97-10-DWQ:
Ravine Water and Amusement Park, Paso
Robles, San Luis Obispo County [Tom Kukol
805\549-3689]
Staff received a complete report of waste discharge
for the proposed Ravine Water and Amusement
Park, which indicated that it would serve up to 700
persons per day. A septic tank and leachfield
system will process up to 4,900 gallons per day of
sanitary wastewater from the restaurant, bar, and
tasting room. The State Water Resources Control
Board adopted Order No. 97-10-DWQ (General
Order) to regulate discharges to land by small
domestic wastewater treatment systems.
Regulating small domestic wastewater treatment
systems using the General Order simplifies and
standardizes the regulatory process. The Ravine
Water and Amusement Park meets the enrollment
criteria for the General Order, and staff enrolled
this discharger on November 1, 2004.
General Waste Discharge Requirements for
Wineries:
Small Winery Waivers, [Matt Thompson,
805/549-3159]
On November 1, 2002, the Regional Board
adopted General Waste Discharge Requirements
for Discharges of Winery Waste (General Winery
WDR). A component of the General Winery
WDR authorizes the Executive Officer to grant
waivers of Waste Discharge Requirements to small
wineries that pose little or no threat to water
quality. The General Winery WDR defines “small
winery” as crushing less than or equal to 80 tons of
grapes per year, or producing less than or equal to
Item No. 10 2 December 3, 2004
5,000 cases or 13,000 gallons of wine per year. In
general, small wineries generate 200 to 300
gallons-per-day (long-term average) of process
wastewater, most of which originates from
equipment (tanks, barrels, floors, etc.) cleaning.
Waivers expire five years from the date granted or
whenever the winery no longer meets the
definition of small, whichever is sooner.
The following table identifies wineries granted
Small Winery Waivers between September 17,
2004, and November 1, 2004.
Facility
Name Facility Location Facility Owner Production and Discharge Description Date Waiver Granted Rideau
Vineyard
1562 Alamo
Pintado Road,
Solvang, Santa
Barbara County
Iris Rideau
Rideau Vineyard produces up to 5,000
cases of wine per year and generates up to
500 gallons per day of winery process
wastewater. Process wastewater is
screened by basket strainers, settled in a
1,500-gallon septic tank equipped with an
effluent filter, and disposed to two 200-
lineal foot leachfields. The disposal area
is greater than 100 feet from any water
supply wells or water bodies. Depth to
groundwater beneath the disposal area is
estimated to be greater than 100 feet.
September 20,
2004
Saucelito
Canyon
Vineyard
1600 Saucelito
Creek Road,
Arroyo Grande,
San Luis Obispo
County
William
Greenough
Saucelito Canyon Vineyard produces up
to 2,000 cases of wine per year and
generates up to 200 gallons-per-day of
process wastewater. Process wastewater
is discharged to a 2,000-gallon
percolation/evaporation pond. The
disposal area located at least 100 feet
from any water supply wells.
September 27,
2004
Keezer
Winery
4855 Devonshire
Lane
Paso Robles, San
Luis Obispo
County
Greg and
Marina
Keezer
Keezer Winery produces less than 5,000
cases of wine per year. Process
wastewater will be processed using septic
tank and leachfield system. The disposal
area is greater than 100 feet from any
water supply wells or water bodies.
September 28,
2004
Midnight
Cellars
2867 Township
Road
Paso Robles
Midnight
Cellars, Inc.
Midnight Cellars produces less than 6,000
cases of wine per year. Process
wastewater will be processed using septic
tank and leachfield system. The disposal
area is greater than 100 feet from any
water supply wells or water bodies.
October 1,
2004
Mesa del
Sol
Vineyard
45803 Arroyo Seco
Road, West of
Greenfield,
Monterey County
Ann
Hougham
Mesa del Sol Vineyard plans to process no
more than 50 tons of grapes and produce
less than 3000 cases of wine per year.
Process wastewater treatment includes
solids separation via floor drain screens
(geotextile fabric), a 1500-gallon septic
tank, and disposal to two subsurface
leachfields. Depth to groundwater beneath
the disposal area is estimated to be greater
than 100 feet.
October 25,
2004
Item No. 10 3 December 3, 2004
Tobin James Cellars, Paso Robles, San Luis
Obispo County [Tom Kukol 805/549-3689]
Regional Board staff enrolled Tobin James Cellars
under the General Waste Discharge Requirements
for Discharges of Winery Waste on November 3,
2004. The Regional Board did not previously
regulate Tobin James Cellars. Tobin James Cellars
is located at 8950 Union Road in Paso Robles, San
Luis Obispo County. Wine production is currently
28,000 cases per year. Process wastewater is
processed through a septic tank/leachfield system.
Tobin James Cellars is subject to Monitoring and
Reporting Program (MRP) No. R3-2003-0084.
Staff will begin periodic inspections of Tobin
James Cellars to ensure continued compliance with
the General WDRs.
Kendall-Jackson Winery, Monterey County
[Martin Fletcher 805/549-3694]
Kendall-Jackson Wine Estates operates a small
winery located at 37300 Doud Road, Soledad,
Monterey County.
The winery crushes approximately 17,500 tons of
grapes per year and receives juice from 4,500 tons
of grapes crushed offsite. The winery produces
approximately 1,577,000 cases of wine, only 2,500
cases are bottled at the site; the remainder of the
wine is bottled elsewhere. The winery is expected
to have an annual average flow of 44,000 gallons
per day with an average crush flow of 96,100
gallons per day and a peak crush flow of 137,000
gallons per day.
Pretreatment solids separation from the winery
wastewater consist of drain screens and a rotary
screen. Treatment occurs in two facultative
aeration ponds. Treated winery wastewater is
recycled and used for vineyard irrigation of up to
75 acres. Screened solids are collected, composted
and used over the 195-acre vineyard as soil
amendment according to best management
practices.
The winery is currently regulated by Waste
Discharge Requirements Order No. 98-02, which
lacked sludge handling requirements and
specifications. With direction from Regional Board
staff Kendall-Jackson Winery voluntarily complied
with sludge handling specifications during pond
liner repairs. Staff’s judgment is that the
wastewater discharge from the Kendall-Jackson
Winery would be more appropriately regulated by
Order No. R3-2002-0084, “General Waste
Discharge Requirements for Discharges of Winery
Waste” (General Requirements) adopted by the
Regional Board on November 1, 2002.
Recommended Case Closures:
UST: Former Arco Service Station No. 2132
Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County,[Tom Sayles
805-542-4640]
Staff recommends closure of this underground
storage tank case where recent (May 18, 2004)
groundwater sample results indicate a maximum of
2.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L) total petroleum
hydrocarbons reported as gasoline (TPH-G). No
other petroleum hydrocarbon constituents (e.g.,
benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and fuel
oxygenates) were detected above the reporting
limit in this, or the other two existing monitoring
wells on-site. The property is an inactive service
station.
Two 6,000-gallon gasoline and two 4,000-gallon
gasoline underground storage tanks (UST) were
removed in 1982. Two 10,000-gallon gasoline and
one 5,000-gallon gasoline UST were removed in
November 1984, and one 1,000-gallon gasoline
UST was removed in September 1987. Soil
samples collected during an August 7, 1987
investigation indicate a maximum concentration of
2,500 milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg) TPH-G
and 7.7 mg/kg benzene in the shallow soils
beneath the site. Based on the results, remedial
excavation removed approximately 1,070 cubic
yards of impacted soil. Approximately 332,000
gallons of hydrocarbon-impacted groundwater
were removed and treated during dewatering
activities required to construct a new hotel
between December 1987 and March 1988. An
additional 26,000 gallons of impacted groundwater
were removed and treated during dewatering of an
elevator shaft between December 1989 and
December 1996.
Following the initial soil investigations, three
groundwater monitoring wells were installed in
March 1989 to evaluate the extent of the
hydrocarbon impacts. The maximum detected
concentrations were 50 mg/L TPH-G and 220
micrograms per liter (µg/L) benzene. Based on
Item No. 10 4 December 3, 2004
these results, a groundwater monitoring program
was implemented.
Based on the groundwater monitoring, it appears
the remedial excavation and dewatering activities
(along with natural attenuation) have been
effective in reducing hydrocarbon concentrations.
The second quarter 2004 groundwater monitoring
results indicate all hydrocarbon constituents were
below cleanup goals with the exception of the 2.0
mg/L TPH-G in MW-2.
The site lies within the Santa Cruz Hydrologic
Unit (304.10), which the “Water Quality Control
Plan, Central Coast Region” (Basin Plan)
designates groundwater as having beneficial uses
for domestic and municipal supply, agricultural
supply, and industrial supply. Therefore, cleanup
goals for common hydrocarbon constituents are as
follows: 1.0 mg/L– total petroleum hydrocarbons
(TPH), 1 µg/L – benzene, 150 µg/L – toluene, 300
µg/L – ethylbenzene, 1,750 µg/L – xylenes, and 5
µg/L – methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE).
Cleanup goals for MTBE and TPH have been
established based on taste and odor thresholds.
Groundwater occurs at approximately 6 to 12 feet
below ground surface and flows to the northwest at
0.08 foot/foot. The extent of hydrocarbon impacts
and subsurface conditions has been adequately
characterized. Monitoring well MW-2 containing
residual hydrocarbon contamination above cleanup
goals is located near the source area and is limited
in extent.
There are no drinking water supply wells within
1/2-mile of the site. Santa Cruz County
Environmental Health Services staff agrees that no
further action is required with respect to this
leaking underground storage tank case. The
current property owner, the responsible party, and
responsible party’s consultant have been notified
of Regional Board staff’s recommendation for case
closure.
Regional Board staff recommends closure for this
site based on the following: (1) the contaminant
mass has been removed from the site to the extent
practical, (2) the TPH-G plume is well defined,
confined to onsite and is only slightly above the
cleanup goal of 1 mg/L, and (4) based on historical
monitoring data, the TPH-G concentration is
expected to continue to decrease with time through
natural attenuation.
Closure is consistent with Section III.G. State
Board Resolution No. 92-49, allowing
consideration of cost effective abatement measures
for a site where attainment of reasonable
objectives less stringent than background water
quality does not unreasonably affect present or
anticipated beneficial uses of groundwater, and
will not result in water quality less than prescribed
by the Basin Plan. If the Regional Board does not
object to staff’s recommendation for case closure,
staff will direct the responsible party and
responsible party’s consultant to properly destroy
the groundwater monitoring wells prior to issuing
a formal case closure letter.
H:\2004 Agendas\Low Threat\Dec 2004\_DEC 04 LOW THREAT
REPORT.doc
From: Malone, Caitlin K.
To: Melissa Martin
Subject: RE: Correspondence re: Ravine Waterpark—Supplemental Comments re Ranch & Coast Properties Appeal Date: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 11:01:39 AM
Attachments: image001.png
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Yes, please include as public comment for tonight’s meeting. Thank you.
Caitlin K. Malone
Legal Practice Assistant
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
WE HAVE MOVED: Our new address is: 1020 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 From: Melissa Martin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 10:35 AM
To: Malone, Caitlin K.
Subject: RE: Correspondence re: Ravine Waterpark—Supplemental Comments re Ranch & Coast Properties Appeal
Caitlin,
The correspondence has been received. Was it your intention to have it included as a public comment on the addendum for tonight’s agenda?
Melissa Martin, CMC
City Clerk
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street, Paso Robles, CA 93446
[email protected]
805-237-3960
www.prcity.com
From: Malone, Caitlin K.
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 10:05 AM
To: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Cc: Elizabeth Hull Piper Smith
<[email protected]>;
Guillen, Christopher R.
Subject: Correspondence re: Ravine Waterpark—Supplemental Comments re Ranch & Coast Properties Appeal
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Good morning,
Please see the attached correspondence from Chris Guillen’s office on behalf of Ravine Waterpark re: Supplemental Comments re Ranch & Coast Properties Appeal.
Caitlin K. Malone
Legal Practice Assistant
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
WE HAVE MOVED: Our new address is: Santa Barbara, CA 93101 STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this email message is attorney privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by calling (303) 223-1300 and delete the message. Thank you.
STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this email message is attorney privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by calling (303) 223-1300 and delete the message. Thank you.
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
April 7, 2026
City Council
City of Paso Robles
1000 Spring Street
Paso Robles, CA 93446
[email protected]
RE: Ravine Waterpark—Supplemental Comments re Ranch & Coast Properties Appeal Dear Mayor Hamon and City Council Members:
On March 23, 2026, Ravine Waterpark (“Waterpark”) provided a submittal to the City refuting each of the points raised in the appeal filed by Ranch & Coast Properties (“Appellant”) of the Planning Commission’s approval of the Waterpark’s Swimming Pool Addition Project (“Project”). In the submittal, this firm detailed why the Appellant’s claims relating to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the Paso Robles Airport Land Use Plan (“ALUP”) are baseless. This letter provides additional information relating to the Project 1) The Project footprint is 9,060 square feet, but existing concrete and turf will remain within the footprint.
As the Waterpark detailed in its submittal, the Project will repurpose 9,060 square feet for pool, spa and cabana use. Presently, the area contains turf/grass and concrete. As a point of clarity, the Project will not remove all of the turf and concrete in the 9,060 square feet area—5,203 square feet of the existing concrete and turf will remain in place as part of the Project. 2) The Project will comply with the City’s Grading Ordinance.
Section 20.20.010(A) of the City’s Grading Ordinance requires every project in the City that requires a grading or building permit to prepare a site-specific erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be developed in accordance with Section III(2.1) Erosion and Sediment Control Plan of the Public Works, Engineering Division and be approved by the City Engineer or Director of Public Works.
Per Public Works requirements, the Project has prepared an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan that includes the following requirements:
• Perimeter BMPs (Best Management Practices) i.e. silt fence, fiber rolls, and gravel bags, shall be installed along all downgradient project boundaries to prevent offsite sediment discharge. • A stabilized construction entrance shall be installed and maintained to prevent track-out onto adjacent roadways.
• All existing storm drain inlets shall be protected with approved inlet protection devices. • Run-on and runoff shall be controlled with berms, dikes, and diversion swales to contain flows within the Project limits.
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
• Sediment traps or basins shall be installed as necessary to detain runoff and allow sediment settlement prior to discharge.
• Disturbed soils shall be stabilized with hydroseeding, mulch, erosion control blankets, or equivalent measures.
• Grading activities shall be phased to minimize the extent and duration of exposed soils. • Dust control measures such as periodic watering shall be implemented to prevent airborne sediment migration.
• Stockpiles and construction materials shall be covered or contained to prevent erosion and transport during storm events.
• All BMPs shall be inspected prior to and after storm events and maintained in effective operating condition at all times.
• Sediment shall be removed from BMPs when accumulation reaches one-third of device capacity.
• Final stabilization (vegetation or permanent improvements) shall be completed prior to removal of temporary BMPs.
The Project, as with every other project in the City that requires a grading permit, is subject to these regulatory requirements.
3) The existing detention basin is in operating order.
The Staff Report for the appeal identifies additional conditions that this Council may require of the Project relating to an existing drainage basin at the Waterpark site. This drainage basin is outside of the Project footprint, and staff included recommendations to regrade the drainage basin and install outflow improvements.
To be clear, the drainage basin is not part of the Project. The drainage basin was approved and constructed as part of the Waterpark’s original entitlement and construction. The Waterpark has repaired and maintained the drainage basin since that time. This week the Waterpark undertook maintenance activities, after the winter season, to ensure the basin maintains its original capacity.
That work has now been completed, as confirmed in the attached memorandum from Wallace Group.
As a result, this added condition is no longer necessary. To the extent the City believes there are other maintenance activities required as to the Waterpark as a whole, the Waterpark would welcome a conversation with City staff through its normal code compliance procedures. 4) There is no evidence the Project will increase the capacity of the Waterpark.
Appellants claim that the Project will increase the capacity of the Waterpark. That is not the case, as explained in the Waterpark’s March 23, 2026 submittal. The Staff Report reflects this conclusion, finding that “any increase in vehicle trips generated by the [project] is minor and does not trigger a new Traffic Impact Study or the need for preparation of supplemental CEQA documents.” (Staff Report, p. 9.) To be clear, Appellant has not presented any evidence that the Project will increase the capacity of the Waterpark, and there is no evidence before the City that proves Appellant’s assertion.
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Attachment 1
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Attachment 2
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Ravine Water Park
April 6, 2026
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment
Piper Smith [email protected]
Guillen, Chris
Q2 - Public Comment