ORDINANCE NO. 864
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON CITY COUNCIL
TO REZONE 59.88 ACRES OF APN 021-025-028, LOCATED WEST OF ROGERS
ROAD, NORTH AND EAST OF THE CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT AND WOUTH OF
THE DELTA MENDOTA CANAL TO THE WEST PATTERSON LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
ZONING DESIGNATION
WHEREAS, Baldwin Ranch Development LLC submitted an application to rezone approximately 59.88 acres, located west of Rogers Road, between the California Aqueduct and the Delta Mendota Canal to West Patterson Light Industrial District; and WHEREAS, in 2012, the City Council approved the West Patterson Business Park Expansion Master Plan to establish land use and regulatory requirements for the subject site; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with this Ordinance, the Patterson City Council by separate Resolution has adopted the Rogers Road Retail and Business Park General Plan Amendment to amend the allowed land uses and regulatory requirements for the development of the subject area, consistent with the West Patterson Business Park Expansion Master Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the City has prepared an Addendum to the West Patterson Business Park Expansion Project Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2011082016); and
WHEREAS, substantial changes will not occur in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and WHEREAS, substantial changes are not present with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND . . . due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or WHEREAS, no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the ND was adopted shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or ND or negative declaration;
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or ND;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or ND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative (CEQA Guidelines § 15162, subd. (a); see also PRC § 21166).
WHEREAS, on August 25, 2022, the Patterson Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing and recommended approval of the rezone; and WHEREAS, based on its review and consideration of the staff report, West Patterson Business Park Expansion Master Plan documents, and oral and written testimony presented, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
1. The proposed rezone is consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation programs of the General Plan;
2. The proposed rezone benefits and does not harm the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare;
3. The proposed rezone will result in an orderly planning use of land resources.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
1. The area designated in the rezone map is rezoned to be consistent with he land use designations depicted therein.
2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, and publication of the Ordinance shall occur in a newspaper of general circulation at least fifteen (15) days prior to its effective date, or a summary of the Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation at least five (5) days prior to adoption and again at least fifteen (15) days prior to its effective date.
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson held on the 20th day of September 2022, by _________________, who moved its introduction, which motion being duly seconded by _____________________. Said Ordinance was given a second reading and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ____, day of ______________, 2022, and after such reading, ________________ moved its adoption, seconded by ____________________, and said Ordinance was thereupon adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
EXCUSED:
APPROVED:
Dennis McCord
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson