Agenda packet, regular meeting — Patterson City Council, February 20, 2024

City of Patterson Page 1 Updated 2/15/2024 4:14 PM
Agenda
City of Patterson
City Council Regular Meeting
February 20, 2024
7:00 PM
Council Chambers
1 Plaza
Patterson, CA 95363

PUBLIC MEETING GUIDELINES
City of Patterson City Council meetings are conducted in person at City Hall Council Chambers. As a courtesy, and technology permitting, members of the public may participate virtually. However, the City cannot guarantee that the public’s access to teleconferencing and translating technology will be uninterrupted, and technical difficulties may occur from time to time.

MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING IN PERSON OR VIA TELECONFERENCE BY CALLING 1-669-900-9128, MEETING ID: 693 538 4239, PASSWORD: 20995363. JOIN FROM A PC, MAC, IPAD, IPHONE, OR ANDROID DEVICE BY USING THIS URL:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/6935384239?pwd=ZmZwMFdYajRsTjlKTnNTamZCWXFXdz09 The meeting will be televised or available for public viewing on comcast cable channel 7 on the following days: Wednesday at 3:00 p.m., Friday at 8:00 p.m. and Saturday at 12:00 p.m. Or watch on internet Vimeo link: https://vimeo.com/channels/patterson/ To access written translation during the meeting, please scan the QR Code or click this link:

Para acceder a la traducción escrita durante la reunión, escanee el código QR o haga clic en este enlace:
https://attend.wordly.ai/join/HSEU-6978
Choose Language and Click Attend / Elija el idioma y haga clic en Asistir Use a headset on your phone for audio or read the transcript on your device.

The City Council agenda and supporting public documents are available for viewing in City Hall, City of Patterson Page 2 Updated 2/15/2024 4:14 PM
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk at (209) 895-8012. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II] The City Council agenda and supporting public documents are available for viewing in City Hall, Administration Department, 1 Plaza, 2nd Floor, Patterson, California, during normal business hours. The City Council agenda and supporting public documents are also available online on the City web site www.ci.patterson.ca.us listed under Popular Links “City Council Agendas” or please call or email the City Clerk at (209) 895-8012 or [email protected] If you wish to be notified of future City Council Meetings, please visit our web site www.ci.patterson.ca.us go to Popular Links “City Council Agendas” and Subscribe to “RSS” ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

1. Call to Order

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Statements of Conflict

4. Proclamation/Presentation

4.1. Proclamation - Black History Month (February 2024) - Mayor Clauzel

4.2. Patterson High School Football Team Presentation (Mayor Clauzel)

5. Items from the Public
Any member of the audience desiring to address the Council regarding a matter on the agenda, please raise your hand or step to the podium, or if using the zoom app by pressing *9 on your cell phone at the time the item is announced by the Mayor. The public wishing to address the Council on items that do not appear on the agenda may do so; however, Council will take no action other than referring the item to staff for study and analysis and may place the item on a future agenda (Resolution 92-25)
In order that all interested parties have an opportunity to speak, any person addressing the Council will be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes unless the Mayor grants a longer period of time (Resolution 92-25)
Please State Your Name and City for the Record.

6. Consent Calendar
All items are approved by a single action. Any item may be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion upon request from a member of the Public, Staff and/or Councilmember.

6.1. Motion to Waive Readings - All Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, Except by Title are hereby waived.

6.2. Approve Minutes of Special Meeting/Closed Session - January 16, 2024 (6:00 PM)

6.3. Approve Minutes of Regular Meeting - January 16, 2024 (7:00 PM) City of Patterson Page 3 Updated 2/15/2024 4:14 PM

6.4. Approve City Department Reports for the Month of January 2024 (Public Works, Fire Department and Community Development)

6.5. Approve City Commission Reports for the Month of January 2024 (Parks Recreation & Beautification Commission)

6.6. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-04, Approving a Retainer Agreement for Construction Inspection Services with Cecil & Cecil Enterprises, Inc., Consolidated CM, Inc., and Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for a term of three years, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

6.7. Approve Resolution No. 2024-05, Accepting as complete Kinshire Water Replacement and the Street Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2 Project; Authorizing Staff to File the Notice of Completion and Commence the One-Year Warranty Period.

6.8. Approve Resolution No. 2024-06, Accepting as complete, the Sperry Avenue Improvements Phase II Project located between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue, Authorizing Staff to file the Notice of Completion and Commence the One-Year Warranty Period.

7. Presentation

7.1. Appointment & Oath of Office of New Patterson Fire Chief Jeffrey Frye (City Clerk Alegre)

8. Presentation/Action Item

8.1. Finance - Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09 Approving the City of Patterson MidYear Adjustments to the Budget for the Fiscal Year 2023/24.

Staff Report: Finance Director Riedeman
Council: Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09 Approving the City of Patterson Mid-Year Adjustments to the Budget for the Fiscal Year 2023/24.

9. Public Hearing

9.1. Finance - Adopt Resolution No. 2024-08, confirming a report and assessment list under Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 704 and 243, for weed abatements (Lien Process)
Staff Report: Finance Director Riedeman
Mayor: Open/Close the Public Hearing
Council: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-08, confirming a report and assessment list under Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 704 and 243, for weed abatements (Lien Process)
City of Patterson Page 4 Updated 2/15/2024 4:14 PM

9.2. Planning Department - Approve Resolution No. 2023-50, approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report and adopting updated development impact fees related to transportation, effective February 21, 2024, per Ordinance No. 608 (M.C. Section 3.64) (continued from February 6, 2024)
Staff Report: Community Development Director Stice
Mayor: Open/Close the Public Hearing
Council: Motion to Approve Resolution No. 2023-50, approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report and adopting updated development impact fees related to transportation, effective February 21, 2024, per Ordinance No. 608 (M.C. Section 3.64)

10. Public Comment/Action Item

10.1. Public Works Department - Authorize Mistletoe Abatement; Authorize Staff to Enter into a Small Value Contract with the Contractor Selected to Abate the Mistletoe; and Authorize Staff to Bill the Property Owners. (Resolution No. 2024- 07) Clean Up Process.

Staff Report: Public Works Director Willett
Mayor: Open/Close Item to Public Comment
Council: Approve Resolution 2024-07

11. City Council Reports
A. Councilmember Alves
. Stanislaus Homeless Alliance (Councilmember Roque alternate) . Stanislaus County Hazardous Waste Advisory Committee (Councilmember Farinha alternate)
B. Councilmember Romero
. Westside Health Care Task Force (Councilmember Alves alternate) C. Councilmember Farinha
. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (Councilmember Romero alternate)
City of Patterson Page 5 Updated 2/15/2024 4:14 PM
D. Mayor Pro Tem Roque
. (EDAC) Stanislaus County Economic Development Action Committee (Mayor Clauzel alternate)
. Workforce Development Board (Mayor Clauzel alternate) E. Mayor Clauzel
. Stanislaus County Mayor's Meeting
. StanCOG (Mayor Pro Tem Roque alternate)
. League of California Cities (Councilmember Farinha 1st alternate, Councilmember Alves 2nd alternate)

12. Other Matters

13. Adjournment

DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Aracely Alegre, City Clerk of the City of Patterson, California do hereby declare that the foregoing notice was posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall, 1 Plaza, Patterson, California on February 15, 2024.

The Agenda is also posted for public view on the Bulletin Boards of the Hammon Senior Center, 1033 W. Las Palmas, Patterson, the Patterson Branch Library, 46 N. Salado Avenue, Patterson, and the City of Patterson City Web Site www.ci.patterson.ca.us Dated this 15th day of February 2024
/s/ Aracely Alegre, CMC, City Clerk
City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Michael Clauzel,
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 4.1
SUBJECT: Proclamation - Black History Month (February 2024) - Mayor Clauzel This item is informational. No action needed.

4.1 Packet Pg. 6

Proclamation

IN HONOR OF BLACK

HISTORY MONTH
“February 2024”

WHEREAS, Black History Month, also known as African American History Month is celebrated each February in the United States; and
WHEREAS, this began in 1926 and was originally planned for one week, to coincide with the birthdays of two important individuals in the fight to end slavery – Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln; and WHEREAS, in 1976, it was expanded to encompass the entire month of February to recognize the significant contributions made by African Americans to our country’s economy, politics, science, religion and society as a whole; and
WHEREAS, to preserve and protect the legacy of African Americans, a time should be set aside to focus on and reflect on the lifetime triumphs and achievements of great leaders, educators, scholars, inventors, politicians, writers, artists and citizens; and
WHEREAS, the theme for Black History Month 2024 focuses on African Americans and the arts. This year’s theme examines the varied history of life of African American arts and artisans and celebrate African American art which is infused with African, Caribbean, and Black American lived experiences; and WHEREAS, in the fields of visual and performing arts, literature, fashion, folklore, language, film, music, architecture, culinary and other forms of cultural expression, the African American influence has been paramount; and
WHEREAS, as we journey toward a stronger, more united City and Nation, let us use this commemoration of Black History Month to serve as a reminder of the need for meaningful dialogue and shared commitment to collective action that uplifts and empowers, as well as of the strength, ingenuity, and perseverance required of us in the years to come.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I Michael Clauzel, by virtue of authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Patterson, California, do hereby officially proclaim “February 2024” as Black History Month. I call upon the larger community of this City to observe this month by expanding their knowledge of the history, culture, legacy, struggles and achievements of African Americans.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Patterson to be affixed this 20th day of February 2024. __________________________
Michael Clauzel
Mayor

4.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: Black History Month - Feb. 2024 (Feb. 20 2024) (Proclamation - Black History Month 2024) City of Patterson Page 1 Updated 2/14/2024 3:54 PM
City Of Patterson
Special Meeting/Closed Session Minutes
January 16, 2024
City Manager
Ken Irwin
City Attorney
Nubia Goldstein
Deputy City Attorney
Douglas White www.ci.patterson.ca.us
Mayor
Michael Clauzel
City Council
Shivaugn Alves, District A
Jessica Romero, District B
Dominic Farinha, District C
Carlos Roque, District D
City Clerk
Aracely Alegre

1. City Manager Irwin

2. City Attorney Varinsky

3. Human Resources Director Guillory-Jones
The City Council will adjourn to Closed Session to address the following:
a. Fire Chief Appointment - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.

2. Statements of Conflict
None.

3. Items from the Public
None.

4. Adjourn to Closed Session
At 6:02 p.m. there being no items from the public, the Patterson City Council adjourned to Closed Session.

6.2 Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City of Patterson Page 2 Updated 2/14/2024 3:54 PM

5. Report from Closed Session (if any)
At 7:00 p.m. Mayor Clauzel announced that regarding Item No. 1a. City Council provided direction to staff.

6. Adjournment
There being no further business, the Special (Closed Session) meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson of January 16, 2024 was adjourned at 7:01 p.m.

Approved by the Patterson City Council on February 20, 2024.

6.2 Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 6:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City of Patterson Page 1 Updated 1/30/2024 12:53 PM
City Of Patterson
Regular Meeting Minutes
January 16, 2024
City Manager
Ken Irwin
City Attorney
Nubia Goldstein
Deputy City Attorney
Douglas White www.ci.patterson.ca.us
Mayor
Michael Clauzel
City Council
Shivaugn Alves, District A
Jessica Romero, District B
Dominic Farinha, District C
Carlos Roque, District D
City Clerk
Aracely Alegre

1. Call to Order
Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Michael Clauzel Mayor Present
Shivaugn Alves District A Present
Jessica Romero District B Present
Dominic Farinha District C Present
Carlos Roque District D Present
The regular (hybrid) meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson of January 16, 2024 was called to order in the City of Patterson at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Clauzel.

City Staff Present:

1. City Manager Irwin

2. City Attorney Varinsky

3. Human Resources Director Guillory-Jones

4. IT Manager Ford

5. Interim Fire Chief Frye

6. Public Works Director Willett

7. Engineering and Capital Projects Director Ulloa

8. Police Chief Clayton

9. Finance Director Riedeman

10. Water Resources Manager Encinas

11. City Clerk Alegre

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Statements of Conflict
None.

6.3 Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 7:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City of Patterson Page 2 Updated 1/30/2024 12:53 PM

4. Certificate

4.1. Parks Recreation and Beautification Award to Soroptimist International of Patterson.

Consensus from Council to move this item to Item No. 5
Kandace Weyhrauch, Vice Chair and Adolfo Virgen, Chair, presented the award to Soroptimist International of Patterson.

5. Items from the Public
Consensus from Council to move this item to Item No. 4
Pat Maisetti, Patterson Resident - addressed the City Council regarding Hammon Senior Center issues. Ms. Maisetti addressed scholarships, termination of programs certain programs such as the green bag program, use of van for seniors, exercise machine money should be returned to those who donated it, would like to see meals on wheels program be part of Patterson.

Kandace Weyhrauch, Patterson-Westley Chamber of Commerce - addressed the City Council regarding the ribbon cutting ceremony for HOST House, tomorrow Wednesday, January 17, 2024 at 5:00 p.m. She also addressed the Hammon Senior Center scholarships, wording needs to change in the activity guide to state that the scholarships are not limited to Patterson students.

Galvin Klein, Field Representative with the Office of Congressman Duarte - addressed the City Council to provide a legislative update.

Justin Farkas, Field Representative with the Office of Senator Alanis - addressed the City Council to provide a legislative update.

Toni Henri, Soroptimist International of Patterson President - addressed the City Council to thank council and the community for their support during the holidays. Presented awards to Mayor Clauzel and Recreation & Community Services Department. Provided statistics regarding participation during the holiday season. Asking for partnership with the City.

Annette Randle, Hammon Senior Center Board of Directors Member - addressed the City Council regarding Hammon Senior Center Board of Director issues.

Adolfo Virgen, Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission Chair - addressed the City Council regarding Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission updates and meeting times.

6. Consent Calendar
Councilmember Farinha motioned to approve Consent Calendar Items 6.1 through 6.8. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Alves and unanimously approved by a 5-0 roll call vote.

RESULT: ADOPTED
MOVER: Farinha
SECONDER: Alves
AYES: Clauzel, Alves, Romero, Farinha, Roque

6.1. Motion to Waive Readings - All Readings of Ordinances and Resolutions, Except by Title are hereby waived.

6.2. Approve Minutes of Regular Meeting - December 5, 2023 (7:00 PM)

6.3 Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 7:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City of Patterson Page 3 Updated 1/30/2024 12:53 PM

6.3. Approve City Department Reports for the Months of September thru December 2023 (Public Works, Fire Department and Community Development)

6.4. Approve City Commission Reports for the Months of September thru December 2023 (Parks Recreation & Beautification Commission)

6.5. Approve Resolution No. 2024- 01 Adopting the Memorandum of Agreement among the Delta-Mendota Subbasin and Groundwater Sustainability Agencies and Approve Resolution No.2024- 02 Adopting the Special Projects Agreement for Development of a Single Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the DeltaMendota Subbasin.

6.6. Accept Donation of a Tiller Truck from Kern County to be used for Fire Department Training.

6.7. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-03, Approving a Retainer Consultant Services Agreement with Bellecci, Black Water Consulting Engineers, NorthStar Engineering Group, O’Dell Engineering, and Provost & Pritchard for General Engineering and Surveying Services for a term of three (3) years, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

6.8. Reject all bids for the Well #8 Tank Recoating Project and directing staff to readvertise at a later date.

7. Presentation/Action Item
At 7:35 p.m. the Patterson City Council adjourned to the West Patterson Financing Authority.

Secretary Alegre called roll call.

All five (5) Members Present:

1. Member Roque

2. Member Alves

3. Member Romero

4. Member Farinha

5. Chair Clauzel
Finance Director Riedeman and Consultant Ken Diker with Del Rio Advisors LLC reviewed their report.

Board Members addressed the following:
- How are Mellor Roos compared to neighboring projects
- Percentage of new developments using Mello Roos
- Follow thru with building all of the homes, what happens to all the bonds - Issuance amount
At 7:48 p.m. Mayor Clauzel opened the item to public comments. There were no comments.

Board Members addressed the following:
- Clarification regarding the payoff of Mello Roos
- Addressed attachment three (3) of the agenda packet regarding the itemized improvements, proceeds can be used for the community center.

Consultant Diker and City Manager Irwin addressed Mayor Clauzel's concerns.

6.3 Packet Pg. 12
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 7:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City of Patterson Page 4 Updated 1/30/2024 12:53 PM
Member Farinha moved to approve the West Patterson Financing Authority Resolution No. 2024-01. The motion was seconded by Member Romero and unanimously approved by a 5-0 roll call vote.

At 7:51 p.m. there being no further business, the West Patterson Financing Authority meeting was adjourned to the Patterson City Council meeting.

7.1. Finance - Adopt Resolution No. 2024-01 Authorizing the Issuance of Special Tax Bonds for and on behalf of the West Patterson Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 (Villages of Patterson), approving and directing the execution of Supplement No. 1 to Fiscal Agent Agreement, approving the form of Preliminary Official Statement, approving sale of such bonds, approving other related documents and actions, and authorize the Finance Department to make the necessary budget adjustments.

8. Public Hearing
City Manager Irwin provided clarification to move Item No. 7.1 to the February 20, 2024 Regular City Council meeting as the information for this item will not be ready by February 6, 2024.

At 7:55 p.m. Mayor Clauzel opened the Public Hearing. There were no comments.

Councilmember Farinha motioned to move Item No. 7.1 to the February 20, 2024 Regular City Council meeting.

The motion was seconded by Councilmember Alves and unanimously approved by a 5-0 roll call vote.

8.1. Planning Department - (Motion to Continue the Public Hearing to February 6, 2024 Regular Council Meeting) Approve Resolution No. 2023-50, approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report and adopting updated development impact fees related to transportation, effective December 5, 2023. Per Ordinance No. 608 (M.C. Section 3.64) related to the approval of transportation development impact fees, motion to approve Resolution No. 2023-50 approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report and adopting updated development impact fees related to transportation, effective December 5, 2023.

9. City Council Reports
A. Confirmation or New Selection of Stanislaus County Council of Governments (StanCOG) Policy Board Member and Two (2) Alternates (Mayor is Primary; and Councilmember Roque are alternates)
By consensus of the City Council:

Primary - Mayor Clauzel
First Alternate - Mayor Pro Tem Roque
Second Alternate - Councilmember Romero
B. Selection of 2024-2025 Mayor pro Tem
By consensus of the City Council Mayor Pro Tem Roque will continue to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for the 2024 - 2025 term.

C. Councilmember Alves
Nothing to report.

6.3 Packet Pg. 13
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 7:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City of Patterson Page 5 Updated 1/30/2024 12:53 PM
. Stanislaus Homeless Alliance (Councilmember Roque alternate) . Stanislaus County Hazardous Waste Advisory Committee (Councilmember Farinha alternate)
D. Councilmember Romero
Nothing to report.
. Westside Health Care Task Force (Councilmember Alves alternate) E. Councilmember Farinha
Nothing to report.
. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (Councilmember Romero alternate)
F. Mayor Pro Tem Roque
Mayor Pro Tem Roque provided an update on StanCOG projects and funding. . (EDAC) Stanislaus County Economic Development Action Committee (Mayor Clauzel alternate)
. Workforce Development Board (Mayor Clauzel alternate) G. Mayor Clauzel
Nothing to report.
. Stanislaus County Mayor's Meeting
. StanCOG (Mayor Pro Tem Roque alternate)
. League of California Cities (Councilmember Farinha 1st alternate, Councilmember Alves 2nd alternate)

10. Other Matters
Mayor Pro Tem Roque expressed his gratitude to Kern County for the fire truck donation.

Mayor Clauzel expressed his gratitude to the property owner, City Manager and the City Attorney for their help with cleaning up the properties at the center of town. Mayor Clauzel also addressed the upcoming Love Patterson event on April 20, 2024.

Councilmember Alves addressed Human Trafficking presentation hosted by Patterson Joint Unified School District and Invest in Me, at the Patterson School District Professional Development Building at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 24, 2024.

11. Adjournment
There being no further business, the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson of January 16, 2024 was adjourned at 8:04 p.m.

Approved by the Patterson City Council on February 20, 2024.

6.3 Packet Pg. 14
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 16, 2024 7:00 PM (Consent Calendar) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Aracely Alegre, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 6.4
SUBJECT: Approve City Department Reports for the Month of January 2024 (Public Works, Fire, and Community Development)

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve City Department Reports for the Month of January 2024 (Public Works, Fire, and Community Development)

6.4 Packet Pg. 15
1 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
“Public Works – Improving Your Quality of Life”

MONTHLY STAFF REPORT
January 2024
Administration & Environmental Compliance Division
 The WQCF LEED Administration Building project is complete with a few remaining items. A site inspection with the State Water Board SRF division was completed on November 8 th
.

Staff will be closing out the project in the next months. (Last update: January 2024).  The city has received SRF Loan funding for a city water meter system replacement project.

The project will replace older water meters in the city to help with water system revenue losses and improve overall utility system management. The project was awarded, and the Contractor (Flowline Inc.) has been replacing the meters. Over 95% of the meters have been replaced. (Last update: December 2023).
 Staff have been working with Willdan Consulting on updating several City facilities, Parks, and Recreation impact fees. Staff has met with the consultant and the Parks & Recreation Master Plan consultant to finalize the costs associated with parks/recreational facilities. The impact fee study is complete and is working on scheduling 2-2-1 meetings to present the item to the Council for approval of the new proposed fees. This item will be scheduled for approval in the next few months. (Last Update: January 2024).
 Staff have been working with Finance to complete the Mid-Year Budget FY 23/24, which will be brought to the City Council for adoption on February 20, 2024. (Last Update: January 2024).
 Staff have started preparation of the new FY 24/25 budgets including the Special Districts (LMDs, BADs, CFDs, CSA). This item will be brought to the City Council in the near future for review and adoption. (Last Update: January 2024).
 Staff began researching a loan program for businesses to be able to comply with regulatory requirements. The loan guidelines, process, and funding will be presented to the City Council in the near future.
 The staff is working towards completing the new Garbage Rate Analysis and is working on scheduling 2-2-1 meetings with the Council. This item will be brought to the City Council in the near future for review and adoption. (Last Update: January 2024).  Staff are working on a new Street Sweeping RFP. The pre-bid meeting was held, and once bids are opened, the item will be brought to Council for approval of a new contract.

Grants and Special Projects
 South Park Per Capita Grant: The city had the bid opening, and the item is scheduled for the October 17th City Council agenda to award the construction contract. (Last Update:

September 2023).
 These are the main projects which Public Works and Engineering are focusing on. These projects include:

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) 2 o Staff continue to work with Engineering to develop the City’s Track 1 Trash Implementation Plan to comply with the State’s Trash Policy requirements. The plan was submitted to the State in December 2018 and the City has 10 years from this date to complete the implementation of their full trash capture plan. Design funds were approved in the FY 19/20 budget. Proposals for design were received and a consultant agreement is currently in progress. The kickoff meeting was held, and the project is currently in progress. The city will be submitting their implementation plan and full trash capture device option(s) to the State. Once approved, staff will work on the next phases of this project which includes preliminary projects design/bid plans. The city will be exploring Prop 1 grant opportunities for this project. (No change). o WQCF Administration LEED Building. Construction is close to completion. The Contractor is working with the city to finalize all remaining items. The building is scheduled for occupancy in November. (Last update: August 2023). o Ward Avenue Sewer Lift Station Rehabilitation Project. Bids were received, all were significantly over budget. The council has rejected all bids. (Last update: June 2023). o Slurry Seal Project. The scope of the work is being determined and preliminary design is underway. (Last update: June 2023).

F.O.G (Fats, Oils, & Grease) Program
The city continues to conduct FOG inspections on a regular basis to ensure compliance.

Businesses that generate fats, oils, and grease are required to have grease interceptors/trap and perform on-going maintenance. The program continues to grow with additional businesses opening up. (Last Update: December 2023).

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program
 A new Phase II Stormwater Permit is in progress at the State level. Once it is adopted, it will be implemented. The city must comply with everything that is in the current permit. It is anticipated that the new permit will be implemented in 2024. Under this new permit, the school districts will be brought in and will be required to have their own stormwater programs. The new permit has not yet been released. (Last Update: October 2023).  The City awarded the design contract to Stantec Engineering for the design of the City’s trash capturing system. The System will consist of trash capturing devices and improvements at the Olive Avenue regional basin and Salado Creek. The kickoff meeting was held in September and the staff is working with the consultant to identify options for this project. Once the project Cost Estimate is developed, the city will be submitting a stormwater grant application to the State Water Resources Control Board to seek funding assistance for this project. (Last updated: January 2024).

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) 3 Water Division & Water Conservation Program
The State Water Resources Control Board has rescinded the mandatory conservation standards that have been in place since 2015. The reporting requirements and prohibitions on water waste will remain. The current prohibitions against wasteful water use practices include outdoor watering during or within 48 hours after a rain event; hosing down a sidewalk instead of using a broom or a brush; and overwatering a landscape to where water is running off onto the sidewalk or into the gutter.

January 2024 Water Production
Well Production
2 0
4- NP 1,540,000
5 19,567,000
6 100,000
7 10,000
8 9,984,239
9 35,871,000
11 143,000
Keystone-NP 0
Floragold-NP 639,400
TOTAL 68,315,639

1. Number of Follow-ups: 7

2. Number of Warning/Violations: 0

3. Number of Penalties: 0

4. Water Service Connection Requests: 5

5. Water Service Connection Turnoffs: 15

6. Water Work Orders: 3- zero usage, high usage, new meter, leak at meter and meter change.

Committees & Commission
Parks & Recreation and Beautification Commission:
 A regular meeting was held on January 17, 2024, and the agenda and minutes are on the Council’s agenda for review. The next meeting is scheduled for February 21, 2024. (Last Update: January 2024).
 Safety (JEMSAC) Committee: The committee holds regular meetings to go over Safety topics and policies. The next meeting is scheduled for February. (Last update: January 2024).

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) 4  Traffic Safety Committee: The committee meets regularly or as needed to address any traffic complaints/concerns received. The last meeting was held on January 9, 2024. (Last Update:

January 2024).

Permits Issued
Encroachment Permits, Fire Hydrant Use Permits, Other Permits Issued by Public Works:
 Encroachment Permit = 5
 Fire Hydrant Use Permits = 0
(Last update: January 2024).

Streets/Collections Division
Work Orders: Streets/Sidewalks = 31 Alleys/Garbage = 4 Collections =3 Seasonal Tasks:
 Storm drains maintenance.
 Repaired potholes throughout the city.
 Performed sewer maintenance.
 Performed sidewalk repairs.
(Last update: February 2024).

Electrical Division
Work Orders: Streetlights = 11
Seasonal Tasks this Month:
 Repaired streetlights throughout the city.
 Reviewed Electrical/SCADA plans for Engineering.
 Continued upgrades at the WQCF.
 Worked on Internet issues at the WQCF.
(Last Update: February 2024).

Urban Forestry Division
Work Orders: Urban Forestry: 25
Seasonal Tasks this Month:
 Performed tree maintenance.
 Addressed requests for service.
(Last update: February 2024).

Parks, Landscape & Building Maintenance Divisions
Park Reservations: All parks are currently closed to reservations and are on a first come first served basis.

Work Orders: Building Maintenance: 72 Parks: 13
Seasonal Tasks & Projects:

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) 5  Continued maintenance of all parks and easements.
 Focused on maintenance pruning in LMDs.
 Performed routine maintenance at City Hall.
(Last update: February 2024).

Fleet Services Division
Number of PW equipment repaired/serviced: Number of PW equipment repaired/serviced:
44 Public Works, Recreation and Community Service vehicles and 3 Fire vehicles. (Last update:

February 2024).

Water Quality Control Facility (WQCF)

MONTHLY FLOWS AND AVERAGES – January 2024
AUGUST 2023 INFLUENT SPOD* NPOD* AIPS

TOTAL FLOW,
MG/ month

51.166 34.333 16.723 .110
AVG FLOW, MGD 1.651 1.108 .539 .004
HIGH FLOW, MGD 2.201 1.738 .875 .109
LOW FLOW, MGD 1.530 .861 .452 0.000
Total Capacity,
MGD

2.25 1.25 .800 .200
* SPOD- South Plant Oxidation Ditch (new) * NPOD- North Plant Oxidation Ditch (old) Alarms/Callouts:

Alarms = 568
Callouts = 10
Seasonal Tasks:

1. AIPS back online.

1. Process control under adjustment for current weather conditions.

2. Continuing Annual PM work.

3. Washer compactor back online.

4. North plant aerator #2 fixed back online.

LABORATORY RESULTS
AUGUST 2023
Avg.

BOD5 TSS TDS pH EC NO3-N TKN TN-N Na Cal
Influent 200 300 * 7.23 * * * * * *
Effluent. 5.6 3.0 1000 7.24 1710 .28 4.5 4.8 230 260
* Not required
(Last update: February 2024)

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) To: Ken Irwin, City Manager
From: Jeff Frye, Fire Chief
Date: Feb 12, 2024
Subj: Fire Department Monthly Report
Mr. Irwin,
The following events, incidents, and other items were conducted at the Fire Department and/or by Fire Department personnel:
• Personnel:
o Trista Bowen, joined the department on Jan 2, 2024 as the City’s new Fire Inspector
o Fire Captain Recruitment with a 30-day application period started on Jan 9 th
.
• Training Hours Completed: 217.4
• Public Education:
o Fire Crews performed public education demonstrations at West Valley Learning Center
• Fire Prevention:
o 10 Annual fire safety inspections performed by Fire Department crews o 38 Sprinkler and Business Inspections completed by Fire Prevention personnel. • Notable incidents
o Residential Structure Fire: 1/25/2024, 11:31 a.m. – Red Robin Drive. • Incident Type Count Report:

Type Description Count
Station: 50 – (Mutual Aid provided to WSF)
3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents
City of Patterson
Fire Department
344 West Las Palmas Avenue
Patterson, California 95363
Main: (209) 895-8130
Fax: (209) 895-8139

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) 1 0.61%
Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service
Incidents
1 100.00%
Total for Station 1 0.61%
Station: 51
111 - Building fire 1 0.61%
131 - Passenger vehicle fire 1 0.61%
Total - Fires 2 1.87%
251 - Excessive heat, scorch burns with no ignition 1 0.61% Total - Overpressure Rupture, Explosion, Overheat -
no fire
1 0.93%
3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 4 2.42% 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 16 9.70%
320 - Emergency medical service, other 1 0.61%
321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 46 27.88% 3210 - Ems cancelled upon arrival 2 1.21%
321M - Medical Aid, *use univeral medical precautions* 1 0.61% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 1 0.61%
Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service
Incidents
71 66.36%
412 - Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) 2 1.21%
424 - Carbon monoxide incident 1 0.61%
444 - Power line down 1 0.61%
Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 4 3.74%
510 - Person in distress, other 8 4.85%
550 - Public service assistance, other 1 0.61%
551 - Assist police or other governmental agency 3 1.82% Total - Service Call 12 11.21%
600 - Good intent call, other 1 0.61%
611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 4 2.42%
611E - EMS: Dispatched & cancelled en route 4 2.42%
651 - Smoke scare, odor of smoke 1 0.61%
Total - Good Intent Call 10 9.35%
7 - False Alarm & False Call 1 0.61%
743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 3 1.82% 746 - Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO 3 1.82% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 7 6.54%
Total for Station 107 64.85%
Station: 52
3 - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service Incidents 2 1.21% 311 - Medical assist, assist EMS crew 5 3.03%
321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 31 18.79% Incident
Type Description Count
Station; 52 - (Continued)
Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service
Incidents
38 71.70%
4 - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 1 0.61%
442 - Overheated motor 1 0.61%
444 - Power line down 1 0.61%

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 3 5.66%
510 - Person in distress, other 1 0.61%
Total - Service Call 1 1.89%
611 - Dispatched & cancelled en route 2 1.21%
611E - EMS: Dispatched & cancelled en route 2 1.21%
Total - Good Intent Call 4 7.55%
7 - False Alarm & False Call 1 0.61%
714 - Central station, malicious false alarm 1 0.61%
735 - Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 1 0.61%
743 - Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional 2 1.21% Total - Fals Alarm & False Call 5 9.43%
9 - Special incident type 1 0.61%
900 - Special type of incident, other 1 0.61%
Total - Special Incident Type 2 3.77%
Total for Station 53 32.12%
Station: 53 (Mutual Aid provided to WSF)
32 - Emergency medical service (EMS) 1 0.61%
321 - EMS call, excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 0.61% 322 - Vehicle accident with injuries 1 0.61%
Total - Rescue & Emergency Medical Service
Incidents
3 75.00%
44 - Electrical wiring/equipment problem 1 0.61%
Total - Hazardous Conditions (No fire) 1 25.00%
Total for Station 4 2.42%
165 100.00%

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) Community Development Department
Monthly Report
January 2024
The following information is provided as an update regarding the Planning and Housing Division activities during the month of January 2024, as well as updates for previously approved projects.

Planning Commission Meetings
No Planning Commission meetings were held during the month of January. The next Planning Commission meeting is tentatively scheduled for February 22, 2024, at 7:00 PM.

Master Plan Update
The administrative draft Downtown Master Plan (DMP) has been prepared by RRM Design Group and is undergoing final amendments. The public draft Downtown Master Plan will be available for comment and review beginning mid-January as environmental review (CEQA) work on the DMP begins. It is anticipated that the remaining components (including public review/hearings and CEQA) in support of the DMP will be completed leading up to City Council review and adoption in June 2024.

Downtown Plaza Circle String Lighting Project
Technical consultants provided city staff with a draft plan and budgetary estimates. City staff is completing an initial review of these documents.

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) Status update for major projects approved during 2023
A&SP Architectural & Site Plan Review TPM Tentative Parcel Maps CUP Conditional Use Permit TSM Vesting Tentative Maps
LLA Lot Line Adjustment P/A Prezone/Annexation
PD Planned Development ORD Zoning Ordinances/Amendments RZN General Plan Amendment/Rezone VAR Variance
Status update for projects approved in previous years
• Sperry Avenue Self Storage – A&SP #22-08, 425 Sperry Avenue – Building permit application submittal pending
• Oak Harbor Freight – A&SP #22-09, CUP #23-02, S. Rogers Rd. – Building permit application submitted
• AT&T Wireless Tower – CUP #23-01, Community Center – Building permit application submittal pending
• Water Office Restaurant – A&SP #22-01, 22 N. Del Puerto Ave. – Construction underway • Southern Tire Mart, A&SP #21-09, CUP #21-10, 2275 Sperry Ave. – Building permit application pending approval
• Sun Valley Industries #2, A&SP #22-02, S. Rogers Road – Approved • Apricot Vet Clinic, A&SP #22-03, CUP #22-04, S. Rogers Road – Building permit issued • VOP Townhouses, A&SP #22-05, N. 1st St. & English Birch Ave. – Building permit application submittal pending
• Scott Davis Used Car Sales, CUP #22-06, 317 S. 2nd Street – Approved • Poppy Mini-Storage – CUP #22-07, A&SP #22-06 – Site improvements under construction • VOP 2.1 LLC Lot 36 housing development, north of Olive Avenue, east of Sycamore, A&SP approved
0 1
2 3
A&SP
CUP
PD
RZN
TPMTSM
P/A
ORD
VAR
Major Projects
Applications previously approved in
2024
Applications approved in January
Applications in Progress
Complete Applications

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) • Popeye’s Restaurant, A&SP #21-07, CUP #21-07, north of Sperry Avenue, east of Park Center Drive, building permit issued
• S2A Modular, A&SP #20-01, CUP #20-04, TPM #20-01 – Site work underway • Nucleus Homeopathics, Inc., A&SP #20-02, CUP #20-05, 240 Park Center Drive – Building permit application pending approval
• Arambel Business Park Warehouse, A&SP #19-02, Rogers Road – Building permit issued • Harvest Samoan Assembly of God Church, A&SP #19-05, CUP #19-05, 415 N. 1st St. – Site work underway
• Safavieh Distribution Center (McShane Companies) A&SP 07-04 (Phase 3) – Approved Major Subdivisions
Villages of Patterson
• Villages of Patterson Apartments, A&SP #18-02, Olive Avenue – Submitted building permit • Self Help Enterprises single family units – second phase under construction • Patterson Ranch – nearing completion
• Clayton Shire – nearing completion
• Camden Shire – nearing completion
• Sycamore Ranch I – site work underway
• Sycamore Ranch II – TM approved, pending FM submittal • Triplexes – construction underway
• Baldwin Ranch North – Backbone infrastructure nearing completion, submitting initial design information.

Housing Projects and Programs
• CDBG: Washburn street/sidewalk project plans in review. • HOME: City Staff continues to work with First-time Homebuyer Applicants seeking loan approvals.

6.4.a
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: Monthly Department Reports January 2024 (Monthly Department Reports) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Aracely Alegre, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 6.5
SUBJECT: Approve City Commission Reports for the Month of January 2024 (Parks Recreation & Beautification Commission)

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve City Commission Reports for the Month of January 2024 (Parks Recreation & Beautification Commission)

6.5 Packet Pg. 27
January 2024
Parks, Recreation & Beautification
Commission
Monthly Report
The following information is provided as an update regarding the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission meeting activities during the month of February and updates for previously approved projects.

Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission meetings are held on the 3rd Wednesday of every month at 5:00 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers. 5-Member Commission
Chair Adolfo Virgen Term: May 2022-2024
Vice-Chair Kandace Weyhrauch Term: May 2023-2025
Commissioner Renelle Layfield Term: May 2022-2024
Commissioner Martha Blanco Term: May 2023-2025
Commissioner Oscar Roman Term: May 2023-2025
Parks & Recreation & Beautification Commission Meeting:

On January 17, 2024, the Parks, Recreation & Beautification Commission was cancelled due to lack of quorum. The agenda items are listed below

1. Parks, Recreation and Beautification Award

2. Wall Mural Project

3. Moving Teen Nights to Friday

4. Ways to Recruit More Coaches for Recreation Sport Activities Agendas & Minutes can be located on the city website under the agenda center.

The next regular meeting will be scheduled for February 21, 2024.The meeting will be held in person in the City Council Chambers.

6.5.a
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: Parks, Rec, Beau Monthly Report - Cancelled Jan 24 (City Commission Reports) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 6.6
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-04, Approving a Retainer Agreement for Construction Inspection Services with Cecil & Cecil Enterprises, Inc., Consolidated CM, Inc., and Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for a term of three years, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2024-04, Approving a Retainer Agreement for Construction Inspection Services with Cecil & Cecil Enterprises, Inc., Consolidated CM, Inc., and Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for a term of three years, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Agreement.

BACKGROUND
A vital part of the Engineering Services Department is to conduct the necessary construction inspections for all new commercial, industrial, residential development, and city capital program (CIP) projects as it relates to civil improvements for offsite and onsite. The Engineering Department only provides minimal inspection services due to limited staffing, therefore, it is necessary to contract for Construction Inspection Services for construction projects throughout the year.

Typical construction inspection responsibilities are, but not limited to the following:
· Prepares Daily Reports for all construction activity, and obtains and/or documents all material tags during construction;
· Assures that the overall Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) is implemented in a manner consisted with the City’s Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) and/or projects’ Special Provisions;
· Works in close coordination with Material Testing personnel, and maintain testing

6.6 Packet Pg. 29
records;
· Assure that the Contractor’s construction operations are being conducted in a safe manner in accordance to the project’s Traffic Control Plan and CAL-OSHA Construction Safety Order;
· Administers the project to assure all elements of construction are furnished, installed and constructed in accordance with the project Plans, Specifications, Caltrans Standard Specifications, and City Standards;
· Create and maintain well-organized construction records and files.

ANALYSIS
The Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was posted on December 15, 2023 and three (3) firms submitted their qualification proposals by the January 11, 2024 deadline. The proposals were thoroughly reviewed using the categories of professional qualifications, experience with similar type of work, staff competence/abilities, accessibility, responsiveness and RFQ quality.

Therefore, City Staff is recommending the following firms for a Retainer Agreement for Construction Inspection Services:

Company
Cecil & Cecil Enterprises, Inc.

Consolidated CM, Inc.

Ghirardelli Associates, Inc
Based on the number of projects upcoming, it is recommended to contract with the three firms listed above.

For each project, a preliminary scope will be sent to the three firms selected. The individual firm would then submit a scope, schedule, and price for the individual project. The City Engineer will make the final determination for each project and execute an amendment to the Retainer agreement to include the specific project. Each amendment will follow City guidelines for approval, contingent on the price associated with each individual project.

The agreements are for a three-year term, with options to extend for two additional one-year terms.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actual encumbrance will be issued via purchase order for each budgeted project. These projects to be completed are listed in the Budgets for Capital Improvements.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 2024-04

6.6 Packet Pg. 30
1 1
2 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-04
3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON, 5 APPROVING A RETAINER FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH 6 CECIL AND CECIL ENTERPRISES, INC., CONSOLIDATED CM, INC. AND 7 GHIRARDELLI ASSOCIATES, INC FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SERVICES 8 FOR A TERM OF THREE YEARS
9 10 WHEREAS, a vital part of the Engineering Department is to conduct the necessary 11 construction inspections for all new commercial, industrial, residential development, and 12 city capital program (CIP) projects as it relates to civil improvements for offsite and onsite 13 construction; and
14 WHEREAS, the three proposals that were submitted were thoroughly reviewed 15 using categories of professional qualifications, experience with similar type work, staff 16 competence/abilities, accessibility, responsiveness; and 17 WHEREAS, for each project, a preliminary scope will be developed and sent to 18 the three firms selected. And firms will then submit a scope, schedule, and price for 19 said project; and
20 WHEREAS, the retainer agreements are for a three year term, with options to 21 extend for two additional one year terms.
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of 23 Patterson does hereby:
24 1. Approve the Retainer Consultant Services Agreement with Cecil and Cecil 25 Enterprises, Inc., Consolidated CM, Inc. and Ghirardelli Associates, Inc. for 26 Construction Inspection Services for a term of three years. 27 2. Authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreements. 28 The foregoing resolution was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 20th 29 day of February 2024 _______________ who moved its adoption, which 30 motion was duly seconded by ______________, and the resolution adopted by the 31 following roll call vote:

6.6.a
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-04 - Retainer CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CECIL AND CECIL ENTERPRISES, INC (Adopt 2 1
2 AYES:
3 NOES:
4 EXCUSED:
5 6 APPROVED:
7 8
9 _______________________________
10 Michael Clauzel
11 Mayor of the City of Patterson
12 13 ATTEST:
14 15
16 _______________________________
17 Aracely Alegre
18 City Clerk of the City of Patterson
19 20
21 22 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution 23 passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th 24 day of February 25 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been 26 rescinded or modified.
27 DATED:
28 ____________________________
29 City Clerk of the City of Patterson

6.6.a
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-04 - Retainer CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CECIL AND CECIL ENTERPRISES, INC (Adopt City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 6.7
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution No. 2024-05, Accepting as complete Kinshire Water Replacement and the Street Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2 Project; Authorizing Staff to File the Notice of Completion and Commence the One-Year Warranty Period.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve Resolution No. 2024-05, Accepting as complete Kinshire Water Replacement and the Street Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2 Project; Authorizing Staff to File the Notice of Completion and Commence the One-Year Warranty Period.

BACKGROUND
Natural pipe deterioration had caused failure to the existing subsurface and asphalt pavement.

The purpose of the project was to replace aging infrastructure. The project scope included replacement of water mains, service laterals, full-depth reconstruction of the existing neighborhood streets, and upgrades to the pedestrian facilities to meet the current American with Disabilities Act (ADA).

ANALYSIS
The City received a request from the Contractor, United Pavement Maintenance, Inc., to be placed on the City Council agenda for acceptance of the Kinshire Water Replacement and the Street Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2 Project bounded by Sperry Avenue to the north, Poppy Avenue to the south, Del Puerto Avenue to the west, and Patterson Irrigation District’s (PID) main canal to the east. City personnel including members of Engineering and Public Works, as well as the Contractor, have conducted a final inspection and the project is ready for Council acceptance. The total cost for construction was $5,494,337.83.

6.7 Packet Pg. 33

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with this item. Final total project costs were within the allocated budget.

6.7 Packet Pg. 34
1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-05
2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON, 4 ACCEPTING THE KINSHIRE WATER REPLACEMENT AND THE STREET FULL 5 DEPTH RECONSTRUCTION (FDR) PAHSE 2 PROJECT: BOUNDED BY SPERRY 6 AVENUE TO THE NORTH, POPPY AVENUE TO THE SOUTH, DEL PUERTO 7 AVENUE TO THE WEST, AND PATTERSON IRRIGATION DISTRICT’S (PID) MAIN 8 CANAL TO THE EAST, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO FILE THE NOTICE OF 9 COMPLETION
10 11 WHEREAS, the Contractor, “United Pavement Maintenance, Inc.” has completed 12 all work for the Kinshire Water Replacement and the Street Full Depth Reconstruction 13 (FDR) Phase 2 Project: bounded by Sperry Avenue to the north, Poppy Avenue to the 14 south, Del Puerto Avenue to the west, and Patterson Irrigation District’s (PID) main canal 15 to the east, in accordance with the contract requirements and plans and specifications; 16 and
17 WHEREAS, the City has inspected the work and recommends that the project be 18 accepted as complete.
19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 20 Patterson that it hereby accepts the project as complete, directs the City Clerk of the City 21 of Patterson to file the Notice of Completion on behalf of the City of Patterson and release 22 the Final Retention Payment for the project.
23 The foregoing resolution was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held 24 on February 20, 2024, by _____ , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly 25 seconded by _______, and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:
26 27 AYES:
28 NOES:
29 EXCUSED:
30 31
32 6.7.a
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-05 - Kinshire Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2 Project (Approve Resolution No. 2024-05, Accepting 2 1
2 APPROVED:
3 4
5 ______________________________
6 Michael Clauzel
7 Mayor of the City of Patterson
8 9
10 ATTEST:
11 12
13 _______________________________
14 Aracely Alegre
15 City Clerk of the City of Patterson
16 17
18 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution 19 passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County 20 of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 21 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been 22 rescinded or modified.
23 24 DATED:
25 26 ___________________________________
27 City Clerk of the City of Patterson
28 6.7.a
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-05 - Kinshire Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2 Project (Approve Resolution No. 2024-05, Accepting Recording Requested By:

CITY OF PATTERSON
When Recorded Mail To:

City Clerk’s Office
City of Patterson
P.O. Box 667
Patterson, CA 95363
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

CITY OF PATTERSON

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Resolution Attached)
Notice is hereby given that:

1. The undersigned is a representative of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.

2. The full name of the owner is the City of Patterson.

3. The full address of the owner is 1 Plaza, Patterson, CA 95363.

4. The nature of the title of the owner is In Fee.

5. The work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on February 6, 2024.

6. The name of the contractor for such work of improvement was United Pavement Maintenance, Inc.

7. The nature of the work of improvement included replacement of water mains, services (existing meters to remain in place and utilized), full-depth reconstruction of the existing neighborhood streets.

8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Patterson, County of Stanislaus, State of California, and is described as follows: Kinshire Water Replacement and the Street Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) Phase 2.

9. The street address of said property is bounded by Sperry Avenue to the north, Poppy Avenue to the south, Del Puerto Avenue to the west, and Patterson Irrigation District’s (PID) main canal to the east.

I, Fernando Ulloa, declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signing on behalf of City of Patterson
Dated: ____________ By
Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer
VERIFICATION:

I, Fernando Ulloa , the undersigned, declare under penalty, under the laws of the State of California that I am the owner, or agent to the owner, of the interest or estate in the property described in the above notice; that I have read the notice, that I know and understand the contents thereof, and that the facts stated therein are true and correct.

Executed on ________________________, at Patterson, California. (date)
Signing on behalf of City of Patterson
Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer, City of Patterson

6.7.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Notice of Completion (Approve Resolution No. 2024-05, Accepting as complete Kinshire Phase 2) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 6.8
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution No. 2024-06, Accepting as complete, the Sperry Avenue Improvements Phase II Project located between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue, Authorizing Staff to file the Notice of Completion and Commence the One-Year Warranty Period.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve Resolution No. 2024-06, Accepting as complete, the Sperry Avenue Improvements Phase II Project located between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue, Authorizing Staff to file the Notice of Completion and Commence the One-Year Warranty Period.

BACKGROUND
The purpose of this project was to maintain and improve roadway safety within the City of Patterson. This project consisted of an overlay/road reconstruction with dig outs as needed along Sperry Avenue between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue in the City of Patterson. The road segment where construction occurred spans approximately half a mile. The road functions as a Minor Arterial Road, allowing a main route through the City for residents and the transportation of goods. Prior to overlaying, pavement surfaces with severe conditions were excavated and reconstructed with aggregate base and asphalt concrete. In addition, all crosswalks within the project area were reconstructed to meet the most current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards. All improvements are located within the City of Patterson right-of-way.

ANALYSIS
This project consisted of providing a 2-inch overlay on Sperry Avenue from American Eagle Avenue to Ward Avenue. The work consisted of excavating areas of pavement that were

6.8 Packet Pg. 38
severely damaged and reconstructing them with full pavement overlay. These improvements included the reconstruction of curb ramps and crosswalks that did not meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. New thermoplastic striping and pavement markings were also applied.

The total cost for construction was $1,575,590.80.

The City received a request from the Contractor, JV Lucas Paving, Inc., to be placed on the City Council agenda for acceptance of the Sperry Avenue Improvements Phase II Project located between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue. City personnel, including members of Engineering and Public Works, as well as the Contractor, have conducted a final inspection and the project is ready for Council acceptance.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with this item. Final total project costs were within the allocated budget.

6.8 Packet Pg. 39
1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2024-06
2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON, 4 ACCEPTING THE SPERRY AVENUE PHASE II PROJECT LOCATED BETWEEN 5 AMERICAN EAGLE AVENUE AND WARD AVENUE, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO FILE 6 THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION
7 8 WHEREAS, the Contractor, “JV Lucas Paving, Inc.” has completed all work for the 9 Sperry Avenue Improvements Phase II Project located between American Eagle Avenue 10 and Ward Avenue, in accordance with the contract requirements and plans and 11 specifications; and
12 WHEREAS, the City has inspected the work and recommends that the project be 13 accepted as complete.
14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 15 Patterson that it hereby accepts the project as complete, directs the City Clerk of the City 16 of Patterson to file the Notice of Completion on behalf of the City of Patterson and release 17 the Final Retention Payment for the project.
18 The foregoing resolution was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held 19 on February 20, 2004, by _____ , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly 20 seconded by _______, and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:
21 AYES:
22 NOES:
23 EXCUSED:
24 25 APPROVED:
26 27
28 29
30 Michael Clauzel
31 Mayor of the City of Patterson
32 6.8.a
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-06 - Sperry Ave Phase II Project American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue (Approve Resolution No. 2024-06, 2 1
2 ATTEST:
3 4
5 __________________________________________
6 Aracely Alegre
7 City Clerk of the City of Patterson
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.
21 DATED:
22 23 ___________________________________
24 City Clerk of the City of Patterson
25 6.8.a
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-06 - Sperry Ave Phase II Project American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue (Approve Resolution No. 2024-06, Recording Requested By:

CITY OF PATTERSON
When Recorded Mail To:

City Clerk’s Office
City of Patterson
P.O. Box 667
Patterson, CA 95363
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE

CITY OF PATTERSON

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Resolution Attached)
Notice is hereby given that:

1. The undersigned is a representative of the owner of the interest or estate stated below in the property hereinafter described.

2. The full name of the owner is the City of Patterson.

3. The full address of the owner is 1 Plaza, Patterson, CA 95363.

4. The nature of the title of the owner is In Fee.

5. The work of improvement on the property hereinafter described was completed on February 6, 2024.

6. The name of the contractor, for such work of improvement was J.V. Lucas Paving, Inc.

7. The nature of the work of improvement was Sperry Avenue Improvement Phase II.

8. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the city of Patterson, County of Stanislaus, State of California, and is described as follows: overlay/road reconstruction with dig outs as needed along Sperry Avenue between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue.

9. The street address of said property is located between American Eagle Avenue and Ward Avenue.

I, Fernando Ulloa, declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signing on behalf of City of Patterson
Dated: ____________ By
Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer
VERIFICATION:

Executed on ________________________, at Patterson, California. (date)
Signing on behalf of City of Patterson
Fernando Ulloa, City Engineer, City of Patterson

6.8.b
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Notice of Completion (Approve Resolution No. 2024-06, Accepting as complete, the Sperry Avenue Improvements Phase II) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Jennifer Riedeman, Finance Director
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO:

SUBJECT:

8.1 Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09 Approving the City of Patterson Mid-Year Adjustments to the Budget for the Fiscal Year 2023/24.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2024-09 Approving the City of Patterson Mid-Year Adjustments to the Budget for the Fiscal Year 2023/24 and Authorize the Finance Department to make the necessary budget adjustments.

BACKGROUND
Staff is submitting the Mid-Year Budget Review Report and proposed budget adjustments based on the information reviewed as of approximately mid-year. The adjustments include expenditure appropriations as well as increases in revenue estimates. In addition to the new requests from departments, staff identified other items that were omitted from the original FY 2023/24 budget and other items that were not authorized as budget amendments in prior Council actions such as in the case of the previous bond issuance activity.

ANALYSIS
A presentation will be made to the City Council outlining the mid-year budget review for FY 2023/24.

General Fund
Total revenues are estimated for the fiscal year at $35.4 million, approximately $2.6 million more than the recommended adjusted budget of $32.8 million. Revenues are

8.1 Packet Pg. 43
estimated higher due to a one-time adjustment in Sales Tax revenue in the amount of $1.3 million as well as a significant increase in Investment Earnings estimates due to conservative original budget and more favorable interest rates. It should be noted that the originally adopted budget includes grant revenues that are contingent on the activity related to the grant funding and may carryover into future fiscal years until the grant is completed. In addition, the American Rescue Plan Act funds were received in prior years and the expenditures are budgeted in the current year, which is the primary reason that expenditures exceed revenues for FY 2023/24.

Total estimated expenditures end the year at $38 million, approximately $1 million higher than the adjusted budget of $36.9 million. Expenditures are likely to be spent at a lower rate than originally budgeted primarily due to the vacancies of budgeted positions during the fiscal year and the normal underspending of expenditures such as Capital Outlay.

The net adjustments to the General Fund is a positive increase of $1,566,639 and are outlined in the attachments to the Mid-year Budget Review Report (Exhibit A).

Enterprise Funds
The City of Patterson provides residents with Solid Waste, Water and Wastewater services. The charges for these services (user fees), along with the costs for providing the services, are accounted for in individual Enterprise Funds. These funds are self-supporting and do not receive any General Fund support. User fees are set in accordance with Proposition 218, which requires that customers be given the opportunity to challenge proposed rates. Rate studies are conducted periodically to ensure the enterprise rates are sufficient to cover: operating expenses, capital improvements, upgrades and costs associated with meeting both State and Federal guidelines and regulations. FY2023/24 user fee budgets for the Enterprise Utility Funds have been adopted in line with rate study projections.

When creating the FY 2023/24 budget in the financial system, we found that there were several entries in the financial system that were also entered in the reverse pending approval to be included in the proposed budget, but the reversed amounts were not removed in the system and consequently excluded from the adopted budget. These are listed separately in the Recommended Mid-Year Adjustments attachment.

The net adjustments to the Enterprise Funds are outlined in the attachments to the Midyear Budget Review Report (Exhibit A).

Other Funds
Staff recommended Mid-year adjustments are included in the Adjusted Budget, where applicable, and adjustments to all funds are detailed in the attachments to the Mid-Year Budget Review Report (Exhibit A), and are summarized below:
· Fund 190 - CFD 2003-1 Fire Station #2 requires an increase in expenditure budget in the amount of $37,166 for an additional firefighter/paramedic position, departmental supplies, and medical exams.

8.1 Packet Pg. 44
· Fund 325 - Gas Tax requires an increase in expenditure budget in the amount of $6,000 for lighted LED traffic signs.
· Fund 327 - Street Projects requires an increase in expenditure budget in the amount of $16,000 for safety barricades and lighted LED traffic signs. · Fund 410 - Parkland In -Lieu Fee requires an increase in expenditure budget in the amount of $2,000 for the Parks & Recreation Master Plan Update. · Funds 180, 252 & 254 require increases in expenditure budget to capture bond funded transactions not previously authorized. The total adjustments are listed in the Fiscal Impact table below.

The net adjustments to the General Fund and the Enterprise Funds are outlined in the attachments to the Mid-year Budget Review Report (Exhibit A).

FISCAL IMPACT
The total net budget adjustments for FY 2023/24 City-wide fiscal impacts are as follows:

Net Budget Adjustments by Fund:

General Fund ($1,566,639)
Garbage Fund 7,250
Sewer Fund 214,902
Water Fund 660,290
CFD 2003-1 Fire Station #2 37,166
Gas Tax Fund 6,000
Street Project Fund 16,000
Parkland In-Lieu Fee 2,000
Subtotal of all Departmental Requests ($623,031)
Bond Funded Transactions:

CFD 2018-1 VOP Infrastructure (Bond Issuance 9/1/22) 1,000,000 PPFA Fund (Bond Refunding 9/1/23) (61,512,945)
PPFA 2013A & B Bonds (Refunded 9/1/23) 61,793,232
Grand Total of all Net Adjustments 657,256
Staff will keep the Council informed of any significant economic impacts to the budget as needed throughout the remainder of this fiscal year, and a financial update will be included as a part of the FY 2024/25 Budget workshop in May 2024.

8.1 Packet Pg. 45
Exhibit A

CITY OF PATTERSON
Mid-year Budget Review Report
Fiscal Year 2023/24

OVERVIEW
The City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Adopted Budget on June 13, 2023. The Mid-Year Budget Status Report provides a tool for the City of Patterson (City) to monitor its finances and to prepare for the upcoming fiscal year budget process. This report provides an update of the City’s budgetary position approximately midway through the fiscal year, with updates based on the requested amendments.

The major components to this report include the following:

I. Economic Update
An economic update on National, State, and local trends provides context to the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Status Report.

II. Fiscal Year 2023/24 Mid-year Budget Status Summary
This section of the report provides estimated Fiscal Year 2023/24 operating results based on current revenue and expenditure trends for the fiscal year.

III. Proposed Mid-year Budget Amendments
This section of the report includes proposed mid-year budget amendments, including a significant one-time increase in Sales Tax Revenues, for Fiscal Year 2023/24.

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
I. ECONOMIC UPDATE
The economic conditions discussed below help inform the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Mid-year Budget Status Report.

National
Inflation has been a major driver in the economy over the past year. As the national economy continues to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve’s primary focus has been to rein in inflation. There has been a major shift in employment and priorities leading to a strong jobs market. Job creation remains strong and the national unemployment rate at 3.5%, which is up from 3.3% from a year earlier per the US Bureau of Labor Statistics as of February 6, 2024.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) According to the statistics for the San Francisco Area as of December 2023, over the last 12 months the CPI-U advanced 2.6 percent. (See Chart 1 and Table A.) Food prices advanced 2.0 percent.

Energy prices increased 6.0 percent, largely the result of an increase in the price of electricity. Table A shows that the index for all items less food and energy rose 2.5 percent over the year.

NOTE: Area indexes do not measure differences in the level of prices between cities; they only measure the average change in prices for each area since the base period.

State
In January 2024, Governor Gavin Newsom released his Fiscal Year 2023/24 Proposed Budget, which projects a $38 billion dollar deficit. However, the Legislative Analyst Office is showing an estimated $68 billion dollar deficit. Because the State Constitution requires the budget to be balanced, the Governor has proposed a combination of solutions to address the budget shortfall, including

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) delays or reductions in previously planned spending, cost shifts, reversion of unspent funds, as well as the use of the State’s substantial reserves.

The tables and related information below is directly from the General Fund Condition Under Fiscal Outlook as published by the California Legislative Analyst Office on December 7, 2023:

State Faces a $68 Billion Deficit. Under current law and policy, we estimate the state faces a budget problem of $68 billion. Figure 3 reflects the budget problem in the 2024-25 ending balance in the Special Fund for Economic Uncertainties.

Extent of Future Deficits Depends on Legislative Decisions This Year. The multiyear deficits shown in Figure 4 are subject to substantial uncertainty. First, revenue estimates can easily differ from our estimates by tens of billions of dollars in either direction. Second, these deficits are based on our assessment of the costs of the state’s programs under current law and policy. The state’s actual costs will be higher or lower depending on decisions made by the Legislature, including, for example, about how to fund schools and community colleges in 2022-23.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) State Has Various Options to Address the Budget Problem. While addressing a deficit of $68 billion will be challenging, the Legislature has several options available to do so. These options include:
• Withdraw Reserves. Under our estimates, the state would have about $24 billion in reserves to help address the budget problem (assuming a budget emergency is declared). • Reduce Proposition 98 Spending. Over the three-year period, the state could reduce General Fund costs by $16.7 billion if it were to lower school spending to the constitutional minimum allowed under Proposition 98. One option for implementing some of this reduction would be to use the Proposition 98 Reserve to cover school-related costs that exceed the Proposition 98 minimum requirement in 2022-23.
• Reduce Other One-Time Spending. We estimate the state has at least $8 billion in one-time and temporary spending in 2024-25 that could be pulled back to help address the budget problem. In addition, there are potentially billions of dollars more in spending from prior years that has been committed but not yet distributed, and therefore also could be reduced to help address the budget problem.
• Identify Other Solutions. Even after using most or all of these solutions, the Legislature still would need to find more solutions to address the remainder of the budget problem. Other options include additional cost shifts (such as more loans from special funds), revenue solutions, and ongoing spending reductions.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) The State’s budget shortfalls could have potential impacts to city revenues, primarily in the form of grants and loans.

Local
The City continues to see strong economic growth over the last several years. The City of Patterson remains focused on new business opportunities and residential growth, including amenities for our residents. Factors that will impact our economic strength are the online sales which, in some instances, do not provide the City with a “point-of-sale” taxable nexus. The city has a diverse revenue structure and can continue to benefit from Measure L, SB1 revenue, new businesses such as the Loves Travel Center, Valero Gas Station, Grocery Outlet, Popeyes Chicken, and other interested businesses.

The City’s water, sewer, and garbage rates were approved in the last few years and will provide stable enterprise funding to provide a high level of infrastructure maintenance in these areas.

Our budget provides for a continuation of high levels of service, capital improvement projects provided by grants and Capital Facility fees, and continued funds to further improve the City and maintain public safety staffing, and new programs to enhance community quality of life for our city’s residents.

The American Rescue Plan Act funds are recorded as part of the General Fund. The city received $5.3 million over a two-year period that will be used to help stimulate our economy and provide much needed economic stimulus and programming to assist businesses and our volunteer organizations.

Several new businesses are coming to Patterson include one new industrial Warehouse (1,000,000 sf), a 120,000 sf furniture manufacturing company, Old Water Office Restaurant, just to name a few. A new Javi’s restaurant was also recently opened in the Historic downtown core and is currently open for business.

The city is fortunate that sales tax remains strong in FY 2023. The major contributing factors for the strong sales tax revenues is primarily due to ongoing on-line sales, agricultural products sales, and a diverse business portfolio. In addition, the city will receive a one-time adjustment of approximately $1.3 million in FY 2023/24 due to adjustments in sales tax allocations by the state.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) II. FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 MID-YEAR BUDGET STATUS SUMMARY
The Mid-Year Budget Status Report represents staff’s best estimate of the City’s budgetary position at approximately midway through the fiscal year, based on activity to date, and making certain adjustments for revenues and expenditures as requested for the remainder of the fiscal year.

This section of the report includes a discussion of Fiscal Year 2023/24 revenue and expenditure estimates compared to budget for the General Fund and Enterprise Utility Funds.

A comparison of mid-year estimated amounts to budget for the General Fund follows:

• The FY 23/24 expenditure budget includes expenditures related to ARPA funding received in the prior fiscal year, which is the major contributor to the expenditure budget exceeding revenues. • Adjusted Budget includes staff Mid-year Budget recommendations previously approved by the City Manager or through prior Council action.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) General Fund
Total requested budget adjustments for mid-year include an increase in revenue estimates in the amount of $2,619,209 due to a one-time increase in sales tax revenue and also a significant increase in earnings on investments. The total offsetting expenditure requests of $1,052,570.

Revenues
Estimated results of the major revenue categories, Property Taxes and Sales Tax are trending higher than budget. Taxes represent the major sources of revenue for the City including property taxes, sales taxes and other local taxes.

A detailed discussion of major revenue categories is as follows:

Property Taxes are the largest single source of revenue for the General Fund. Property tax revenue is based on the assessed valuation of property in the City. Current fiscal year projections are expected to not change from the original budget. As a result, no amendment is proposed for FY 2023/24.

While California’s statewide median price slightly decreased from November, it posted its largest year-over-year gain since May 2022. December’s statewide median home price was $817,740, down 0.3 percent from November and up 6.4 percent from a year ago. 2023 was a tough year as a shortage of homes for sale and high costs of borrowing continued to have a negative impact on housing inventory and demand. With mortgage rates expected to decline in the next 12 months, home sales will bounce back as buyers and sellers return to a more favorable housing market.

Home prices should see a moderate increase in 2024 as well.

The information in the tables below from HdL shows the number of detached single-family residential sales (by quarter) and the median sale price for those properties.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Sales Tax revenues are the second largest source of revenue for the General Fund. Despite the slowing economy, consumer spending has remained relatively steady, although slightly below the pace forecast in the original budget.

Current projections from the City’s sales tax consultant estimate FY 2023/24 sales tax revenues will be $1.3 Million higher than the adopted budget due to unanticipated sales tax adjustments made by the state. After this adjustment, our sales tax revenue budget would be approximately $14.4 million for FY 2023/24. However, the estimate for FY 2024/25 is expected to return to a modest increase over the originally adopted budget in FY 2023/24.

Below are HdL reports showing the Sales Tax by Major Industry Group as well as the trends for the past few years:

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report)

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Charges for Services are estimated at $500,000 higher than the adopted budget, primarily due to a change in accounting treatment for reimbursable expenditures. This revenue comes from developer deposits and is reclassified as revenue once the offsetting expenditures are incurred.

Investment Earnings are estimated to increase by $725,000, which is significantly higher than the Adopted Budget, primarily due to an increase in return on investments for Pension and Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) prefunding deposits at the Public Agency Retirement Service (PARS), as well as favorable returns on increased deposits with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF).

In addition, the current predictions about the falling interest rate environment for the remainder of the fiscal year indicate that the city will experience large end of year fair market value adjustment gains in the investment portfolio that will positively impact the surplus at the end of the fiscal year. While this amount is not factored into the Mid-Year Budget adjustments, the result will positively contribute to this year’s final ending balances that will be made available for future budget needs.

Expenditures
The underspending of expenditures, or budget savings, are expected each fiscal year due to vacant positions and other budgeted expenditures not incurred during the fiscal year. Total estimated expenditures are $38 million, approximately $1 million more than the Adjusted Budget.

A brief explanation of the assumptions and major changes in expenditures follows:

Salaries and Benefits expenditures are estimated at $10.26, approximately $157,000 higher than the adjusted budget. Savings in Salaries & Wages are expected at the end of the year as not all positions are filled for the entire fiscal year. This is typically the case for newly budgeted positions each year as the positions are not immediately filled.

Other Services & Charges are estimated at approximately $500,000 higher than the adjusted budget, primarily due to a change in accounting treatment for reimbursable expenditures. The reimbursable expenditures are covered by revenue from developer deposits.

Capital Outlay expenditures are estimated at $4.2 million, approximately $160,000 more than the adjusted budget. However, budgeted Capital Outlay expenditures are frequently delayed due to various project delays, and any unspent budget will be carried forward into future fiscal years to complete these projects.

Total combined General Fund budget amendments result in a net positive Mid-Year change of approximately $1.5 million.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Enterprise Utility Funds
The City’s three enterprise utility funds (Garbage, Sewer and Water) are funded by the rates charged to customers. A rate study for each of the utilities is performed every 5 years, with rates modifications developed for the 5-year period. The rates are designed to comply with Article 13D of the California Constitution and to a) recover the City’s cost of providing water, sewer or garbage services, and b) allocate costs in proportion to the cost for serving each customer class.

Garbage Fund
This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s garbage services. Services are on a user charge basis to residents and business owners located in Patterson. The city operates and maintains a solid waste system that serves approximately 6,800 customers, primarily residential. The City contracts with a third party to collect and dispose of its solid waste and has a contract with the County of Stanislaus to use its solid waste disposal sites.

A comparison of mid-year estimated amounts to budget for the Garbage Fund follows (dollars in thousands):
• Adjusted Budget includes staff Mid-year Budget recommendations previously approved by the City Manager or through prior Council action.

Garbage Fund
Account Type Adopted
Budget
Prior Budget
Adjustments
Adjusted
Budget
Mid-Year
Requests
Budget
Estimate
Revenue
Taxes $ (35,494) $ - $ (35,494) $ - $ (35,494)
Intergovernmental (4,320) - (4,320) - (4,320)
Charges for Services (4,300,917) - (4,300,917) - (4,300,917) Investment Earnings (3,563) - (3,563) - (3,563)
Other Revenues (35,000) - (35,000) - (35,000)
Revenue Total $ (4,379,294) $ - $ (4,379,294) $ - $ (4,379,294) Expense
Salaries & Wages $ 959,739 $ - $ 959,739 $ - $ 959,739
Benefits 436,845 - 436,845 - 436,845
Professional & Contracted Serv 2,480,292 - 2,480,292 - 2,480,292 Repair & Maintenance 13,650 (713) 12,937 1,750 14,687
Materials & Supplies 29,017 3,050 32,067 5,500 37,567
Other Services & Charges 27,200 2,838 30,038 - 30,038
Capital Outlay 7,260 190,908 198,168 - 198,168
Transfers Out 789,206 - 789,206 - 789,206
Rentals 5,450 - 5,450 - 5,450
Expense Total $ 4,748,659 $ 196,084 $ 4,944,742 $ 7,250 $ 4,951,992 Grand Total $ 369,364 $ 196,084 $ 565,448 $ 7,250 $ 572,698

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) The last Solid Waste Rate study was done in 2019 and proposed rate increases of 4.9% each fiscal year from FY 2019/20 through FY 2023/24.

Estimated expenditures of $4.9 million are about $200,000 more than the adopted budget primarily due to carry over amounts from prior fiscal years. However, the underspending of expenditures is normal and expected as not all budgeted expenditures are spent and will be carried forward to future fiscal years.

Sewer Fund
This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s wastewater collection and treatment. The city provides wastewater service to approximately 6,800 customers, on a user charge basis. The majority are single family residents, and approximately 595 customers in Diablo Grande. The city owns, operates, and maintains its own wastewater system which includes a treatment plant, three lift stations, and a collection system.

A comparison of mid-year estimated amounts to budget for the Sewer Fund follows (dollars in thousands):
• Adjusted Budget includes staff Mid-year Budget recommendations previously approved by the City Manager or through prior Council action.

Sewer Fund
Account Type Adopted
Budget
Prior Budget
Adjustments
Adjusted
Budget
Mid-Year
Requests
Budget
Estimate
Revenue
Licenses & Permits $ (3,200) $ - $ (3,200) $ - $ (3,200) Charges for Services (5,591,822) - (5,591,822) - (5,591,822) Fines & Forfeitures (3,000) - (3,000) - (3,000)
Investment Earnings (6,603) - (6,603) - (6,603)
Other Revenues (698,353) - (698,353) (1,600) (699,953)
Transfers In (10,879,885) - (10,879,885) - (10,879,885) Revenue Total $ (17,182,863) $ - $ (17,182,863) $ (1,600) $ (17,184,463) Expense
Salaries & Wages $ 2,171,891 $ - $ 2,171,891 $ 58,202 $ 2,230,093 Benefits 1,096,890 - 1,096,890 - 1,096,890
Professional & Contracted Svcs 978,287 48,838 1,027,125 50,000 1,077,125 Repair & Maintenance 198,700 (7,158) 191,542 1,000 192,542 Materials & Supplies 254,450 36,110 290,560 1,600 292,160 Other Services & Charges 227,388 - 227,388 - 227,388
Capital Outlay 10,760,802 307,268 11,068,070 105,700 11,173,770 Debt Service 628,386 - 628,386 - 628,386
Transfers Out 2,646,567 - 2,646,567 - 2,646,567
Rentals 41,700 19,109 60,809 - 60,809
Expense Total $ 19,005,061 $ 404,167 $ 19,409,228 $ 216,502 $ 19,625,730 Grand Total $ 1,822,198 $ 404,167 $ 2,226,365 $ 214,902 $ 2,441,267

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) The 2020 Sewer Rate study proposed rate increases of 6% each year. The first increase was effective January 1, 2022, subsequent rates are effective each July 1 through July 1, 2025. Total revenues are estimated to only slightly change from the originally adopted budget of $17.1 million, and estimated expenditures of $19.6 million are approximately $620,000 more that the originally adopted budget primarily due to carry over amounts from prior fiscal years. However, the underspending of expenditures is normal and expected as not all budgeted expenditures are spent and will be carried forward to future fiscal years.

Water Fund
This fund accounts for all financial transactions relating to the City’s water service. Services are on a user charge basis to residents and business owners in Patterson. The city owns and operates its own water system and provides service to approximately 7,100 customers. Groundwater wells are the City’s sole source of water supply. The city operates nine wells and three water storage facilities. The city continues to invest in expanding its water infrastructure to meet the demands of rapid population growth.

Comparison of mid-year estimated amounts to budget for the Water Fund follows (dollars in thousands):
• Adjusted Budget includes staff Mid-year Budget recommendations previously approved by the City Manager or through prior Council action.

Water Fund
Account Type Adopted
Budget
Prior Budget
Adjustments
Adjusted
Budget
Mid-Year
Requests
Budget
Estimate
Revenue
Charges for Services $ (6,798,821) $ - $ (6,798,821) $ (50,000) $ (6,848,821) Investment Earnings (27,068) - (27,068) - (27,068)
Other Revenues (1,984,100) - (1,984,100) - (1,984,100)
Transfers In (6,021,932) - (6,021,932) - (6,021,932)
Revenue Total $ (14,831,921) $ - $ (14,831,921) $ (50,000) $ (14,881,921) Expense
Salaries & Wages $ 2,158,443 $ - $ 2,158,443 $ 9,290 $ 2,167,733 Benefits 981,941 - 981,941 - 981,941
Professional & Contracted Serv 535,233 28,088 563,321 - 563,321 Repair & Maintenance 107,155 2,510 109,665 16,000 125,665 Materials & Supplies 250,867 10,713 261,580 64,000 325,580 Other Services & Charges 577,995 - 577,995 - 577,995
Capital Outlay 3,624,046 3,723,598 7,347,644 621,000 7,968,644 Debt Service 1,203,673 - 1,203,673 - 1,203,673
Transfers Out 5,865,555 - 5,865,555 - 5,865,555
Rentals 13,400 - 13,400 - 13,400
Expense Total $ 15,318,307 $ 3,764,909 $ 19,083,216 $ 710,290 $ 19,793,506 Grand Total $ 486,385 $ 3,764,909 $ 4,251,295 $ 660,290 $ 4,911,585

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Total revenues are estimated at $14.8 million, slightly higher than originally budgeted due to an increase for meter installations of $50,000. The latest water rate study was completed in 2022 and recommended overall rate increases of 2.0% each year over the next five years. Rate increases are proposed to be effective January 1 of each year. In the rate study, a survey was conducted comparing the typical water bills of regional agencies. Based on the survey performed, Patterson’s typical monthly residential water bill is in the middle range in the region.

Total expenditures are estimated at $19.7 million, $660,290 higher than the Adjusted Budget primarily due to increases in capital outlay budget primarily due to carry over amounts from prior fiscal years. However, the underspending of expenditures is normal and expected as not all budgeted expenditures are spent and will be carried forward to future fiscal years.

III. RECOMMENDED MID-YEAR BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS
The mid-year budget review provides an opportunity for the city to adjust the budget to recognize unanticipated revenues and costs and to propose expenditures to address high-priority community and operational needs. Any proposed adjustments are made with consideration of the resources needed to provide services to the public and the fiscal capacity to fund this level of resources. Each department continuously reviews its programs and operations, as well as changing economic conditions and emerging community needs.

A complete listing of all recommended increases is included as an attachment.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Exhibit A (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) RESOLUTION NO. 2024-09

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PATTERSON APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 MID YEAR

BUDGET REVIEW REPORT AND ADOPTING ITS
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REVISING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS
WHEREAS, the City is required by law to approve a budget prior to the beginning of each fiscal year, and finds it prudent to review the status of the budget at Mid-Year each year; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director and other City Department Heads have undertaken a thorough review and projected revenues and expenditures for the remainder of the fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of City of Patterson has been presented with a Mid-Year Budget Review Report, and Staff recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Mid-Year Budget Review Report and review Report and wishes to approve and adopt the Staff recommendations and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Patterson herby approves and adopts the Staff recommendations included in the Mid-Year Budget Review Report presented by the City Manager.

The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson, held on the 20th day of February 2024 by , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:
____
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson

8.1.b
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-09_Mid Year FY 23-24 (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) ATTEST:
_______________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:
______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

8.1.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-09_Mid Year FY 23-24 (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) FY 2023/24 Mid
-Year
Budget Review
1 February 20, 2024

8.1.c
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) FY 2023/24 Mid
-Year Budget Review
2 • FY 2023/24 Total Mid-Year Adjustments
• General Fund Adjustments • Garbage Fund Adjustments • Sewer Fund Adjustments • Water Fund Adjustments

8.1.c
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) 3 Total FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Adjustments
All Funds

8.1.c
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) 4 FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Adjustments
General Funds (100 – 111)

8.1.c
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) General Fund (100) FY 2023/24 Mid-Year
Budge Review, continued
5 General Fund revenue estimates
increased from the adjusted budget due
to the following :
• Sales Taxes increased due to a onetime adjustment in the allocation by the state
• Charges for Services increased due
to the accounting treatment of
reimbursable expenditures,
whereby the revenue will come
from developer deposits to cover
related expenditures.
• Investment Earnings increased due
to an increase on return on
investments from increased
deposits.

General Fund budgeted expenditure
estimates increased from the
adjusted budget due to the following:
• Salary & Benefit increases based on
additional position requests.
• Other Services & Charges increased
due to the accounting treatment of
reimbursable expenditures.
• Capital Outlay projects increased
due to new command vehicle for
the Fire Department

8.1.c
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) FY 2023/24 Mid
-Year Adjustments
Garbage Fund (600)
6 8.1.c
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) FY 2023/24 Mid
-Year Adjustments
Sewer Funds (605,606,607)
7 8.1.c
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) FY 2023/24 Mid
-Year Adjustments
Water Funds (610, 611, 612)
8 8.1.c
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Questions
&
Staff Recommendations
9 • Questions? • Adopt a Resolution Approving the Mid
-Year Budget Adjustments
for FY 2023/24.

8.1.c
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: FY 2023-24 Mid-Year Budget Review Presentation (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Attachment 1
Mid-Year Budget Requests by Fund
Funding Source Account Type Revenues
Requested
Amount
100 - 111
General Fund
600
Garbage
Fund
605-607
Sewer
Fund
610-612
Water
Fund
General Fund Taxes 1,381,209 (1,381,209)
General Fund Investment Earnings 725,000 (725,000)
General Fund Recreation Program 2,000 (2,000)
General Fund Recreation Program 11,000 (11,000)
General Fund Charges for Services 500,000 (500,000)
General Fund Salaries & Wages 74,319 74,319
General Fund Salaries & Wages 67,791 67,791
General Fund Salaries & Wages 15,278 15,278
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 5,000 5,000 General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 100,000 100,000 General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 25,000 25,000 General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 15,000 15,000 General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 6,500 6,500 General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 3,544 3,544 General Fund Other Services & Charges 500,000 500,000
General Fund Other Services & Charges 2,500 2,500
General Fund Other Services & Charges 3,000 3,000
General Fund Rentals 57,500 57,500
General Fund Materials & Supplies 3,000 3,000
General Fund Materials & Supplies 7,000 7,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 5,000 5,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 1,000 1,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 500 500
General Fund Capital Outlay 99,743 99,743
General Fund Capital Outlay 7,000 7,000
General Fund Capital Outlay 12,695 12,695
General Fund Capital Outlay 20,000 20,000
General Fund Capital Outlay 1,200 1,200
General Fund Capital Outlay 20,000 20,000
General Fund Total 2,619,209 1,052,570 (1,566,639) - - - Garbage Fund Repair & Maintenance 1,750 1,750
Garbage Fund Materials & Supplies 5,500 5,500
Garbage Fund Total - 7,250 - 7,250 - -
Sewer Other Revenues 1,600 (1,600)
Sewer Salaries & Wages 9,290 9,290
Sewer Professional & Contracted Svcs 50,000 50,000
Sewer Other Services & Charges 1,600 1,600
Sewer Capital Outlay 1,700 1,700
Sewer Capital Outlay 35,000 35,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 3,000 3,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 5,000 5,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 1,000 1,000
Sewer Repair & Maintenance 1,000 1,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 60,000 60,000
Sewer Salaries & Wages 48,912 48,912
Sewer Total 1,600 216,502 - - 214,902 -
Water Charges for Services 50,000 (50,000)
Water Salaries & Wages 9,290 9,290
Water Repair & Maintenance 15,000 15,000
Water Repair & Maintenance 1,000 1,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000 2,000
Water Materials & Supplies 50,000 50,000
Water Materials & Supplies 4,000 4,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000 2,000
Water Materials & Supplies 4,000 4,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000 2,000
Water Capital Outlay 22,000 22,000
Water Capital Outlay 75,000 75,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 15,000 15,000
Water Capital Outlay 3,000 3,000
Water Capital Outlay 186,000 186,000
Water Capital Outlay 85,000 85,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 52,000 52,000
Water Capital Outlay 3,000 3,000
Water Total 50,000 710,290 - - - 660,290
Public Safety Salaries & Wages 31,166
Public Safety Materials & Supplies 3,000
Public Safety Other Services & Charges 3,000
Public Safety Total - 37,166 - - - -
Gas Tax Capital Outlay 6,000
Gas Tax Total - 6,000 - - - -
Street Projects Materials & Supplies 10,000
Street Projects Capital Outlay 6,000
Street Projects Total - 16,000 - - - -
Parkland In-lieu Fee Capital Outlay 2,000
Parkland In-lieu Fee Total - 2,000 - - - -
CFD 2018-01 VOP Miscellaneous Expense 1,000,000
CFD 2018-01 VOP Total - 1,000,000 - - - -
PPFA 2013 Bonds Transfer Out 61,793,232
PPFA 2013 Bonds Total - 61,793,232 - - - -
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Interest Income 119,899
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Bond Proceeds 60,987,848 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Transfers In 61,793,232
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Principal Expense 58,500,000 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Interest Expense 1,637,497 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Costs of Issuance 758,092 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Underwriter's Discount 271,850 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Bond Premium 220,595
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Total 122,900,979 61,388,034 - - - - Grand Total 125,571,788 126,229,044 (1,566,639) 7,250 214,902 660,290 1

8.1.d
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Mid Year 2023-24 List of Adjustments (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Attachment 1
Mid-Year Budget Requests by Fund
Funding Source Account Type Revenues
Requested
Amount
General Fund Taxes 1,381,209
General Fund Investment Earnings 725,000
General Fund Recreation Program 2,000
General Fund Recreation Program 11,000
General Fund Charges for Services 500,000
General Fund Salaries & Wages 74,319
General Fund Salaries & Wages 67,791
General Fund Salaries & Wages 15,278
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 5,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 100,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 25,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 15,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 6,500
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 3,544
General Fund Other Services & Charges 500,000
General Fund Other Services & Charges 2,500
General Fund Other Services & Charges 3,000
General Fund Rentals 57,500
General Fund Materials & Supplies 3,000
General Fund Materials & Supplies 7,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 5,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 1,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 500
General Fund Capital Outlay 99,743
General Fund Capital Outlay 7,000
General Fund Capital Outlay 12,695
General Fund Capital Outlay 20,000
General Fund Capital Outlay 1,200
General Fund Capital Outlay 20,000
General Fund Total 2,619,209 1,052,570
Garbage Fund Repair & Maintenance 1,750
Garbage Fund Materials & Supplies 5,500
Garbage Fund Total - 7,250
Sewer Other Revenues 1,600
Sewer Salaries & Wages 9,290
Sewer Professional & Contracted Svcs 50,000
Sewer Other Services & Charges 1,600
Sewer Capital Outlay 1,700
Sewer Capital Outlay 35,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 3,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 5,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 1,000
Sewer Repair & Maintenance 1,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 60,000
Sewer Salaries & Wages 48,912
Sewer Total 1,600 216,502
Water Charges for Services 50,000
Water Salaries & Wages 9,290
Water Repair & Maintenance 15,000
Water Repair & Maintenance 1,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000
Water Materials & Supplies 50,000
Water Materials & Supplies 4,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000
Water Materials & Supplies 4,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000
Water Capital Outlay 22,000
Water Capital Outlay 75,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 15,000
Water Capital Outlay 3,000
Water Capital Outlay 186,000
Water Capital Outlay 85,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 52,000
Water Capital Outlay 3,000
Water Total 50,000 710,290
Public Safety Salaries & Wages 31,166
Public Safety Materials & Supplies 3,000
Public Safety Other Services & Charges 3,000
Public Safety Total - 37,166
Gas Tax Capital Outlay 6,000
Gas Tax Total - 6,000
Street Projects Materials & Supplies 10,000
Street Projects Capital Outlay 6,000
Street Projects Total - 16,000
Parkland In-lieu Fee Capital Outlay 2,000
Parkland In-lieu Fee Total - 2,000
CFD 2018-01 VOP Miscellaneous Expense 1,000,000
CFD 2018-01 VOP Total - 1,000,000
PPFA 2013 Bonds Transfer Out 61,793,232
PPFA 2013 Bonds Total - 61,793,232
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Interest Income 119,899
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Bond Proceeds 60,987,848 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Transfers In 61,793,232
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Principal Expense 58,500,000 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Interest Expense 1,637,497 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Costs of Issuance 758,092 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Underwriter's Discount 271,850 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Bond Premium 220,595
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Total 122,900,979 61,388,034 Grand Total 125,571,788 126,229,044
190
CFD 2003-1
Fire Station
#2
325
Gas Tax
Fund
327
Street
Projects
Fund
410
Parkland InLieu Fee
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
31,166
3,000
3,000
37,166 - - -
6,000
- 6,000 - -
10,000
6,000
- - 16,000 -
2,000
- - - 2,000
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
37,166 6,000 16,000 2,000 2

8.1.d
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Mid Year 2023-24 List of Adjustments (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) Attachment 1
Mid-Year Budget Requests by Fund
Funding Source Account Type Revenues
Requested
Amount
General Fund Taxes 1,381,209
General Fund Investment Earnings 725,000
General Fund Recreation Program 2,000
General Fund Recreation Program 11,000
General Fund Charges for Services 500,000
General Fund Salaries & Wages 74,319
General Fund Salaries & Wages 67,791
General Fund Salaries & Wages 15,278
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 5,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 100,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 25,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 15,000
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 6,500
General Fund Professional & Contracted Svcs 3,544
General Fund Other Services & Charges 500,000
General Fund Other Services & Charges 2,500
General Fund Other Services & Charges 3,000
General Fund Rentals 57,500
General Fund Materials & Supplies 3,000
General Fund Materials & Supplies 7,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 5,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 1,000
General Fund Repair & Maintenance 500
General Fund Capital Outlay 99,743
General Fund Capital Outlay 7,000
General Fund Capital Outlay 12,695
General Fund Capital Outlay 20,000
General Fund Capital Outlay 1,200
General Fund Capital Outlay 20,000
General Fund Total 2,619,209 1,052,570
Garbage Fund Repair & Maintenance 1,750
Garbage Fund Materials & Supplies 5,500
Garbage Fund Total - 7,250
Sewer Other Revenues 1,600
Sewer Salaries & Wages 9,290
Sewer Professional & Contracted Svcs 50,000
Sewer Other Services & Charges 1,600
Sewer Capital Outlay 1,700
Sewer Capital Outlay 35,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 3,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 5,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 1,000
Sewer Repair & Maintenance 1,000
Sewer Capital Outlay 60,000
Sewer Salaries & Wages 48,912
Sewer Total 1,600 216,502
Water Charges for Services 50,000
Water Salaries & Wages 9,290
Water Repair & Maintenance 15,000
Water Repair & Maintenance 1,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000
Water Materials & Supplies 50,000
Water Materials & Supplies 4,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000
Water Materials & Supplies 4,000
Water Materials & Supplies 2,000
Water Capital Outlay 22,000
Water Capital Outlay 75,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 15,000
Water Capital Outlay 3,000
Water Capital Outlay 186,000
Water Capital Outlay 85,000
Water Capital Outlay 60,000
Water Capital Outlay 52,000
Water Capital Outlay 3,000
Water Total 50,000 710,290
Public Safety Salaries & Wages 31,166
Public Safety Materials & Supplies 3,000
Public Safety Other Services & Charges 3,000
Public Safety Total - 37,166
Gas Tax Capital Outlay 6,000
Gas Tax Total - 6,000
Street Projects Materials & Supplies 10,000
Street Projects Capital Outlay 6,000
Street Projects Total - 16,000
Parkland In-lieu Fee Capital Outlay 2,000
Parkland In-lieu Fee Total - 2,000
CFD 2018-01 VOP Miscellaneous Expense 1,000,000
CFD 2018-01 VOP Total - 1,000,000
PPFA 2013 Bonds Transfer Out 61,793,232
PPFA 2013 Bonds Total - 61,793,232
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Interest Income 119,899
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Bond Proceeds 60,987,848 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Transfers In 61,793,232
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Principal Expense 58,500,000 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Interest Expense 1,637,497 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Costs of Issuance 758,092 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Underwriter's Discount 271,850 PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Bond Premium 220,595
PPFA 2023 WPFA Rev. Ref. Bonds Total 122,900,979 61,388,034 Grand Total 125,571,788 126,229,044
180
CFD 2018-1
VOP
Infrastructure
Bonds
254
PPFA Fund
2023 Bonds
252
PPFA 2013
Bonds
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
- - -
1,000,000
1,000,000 - -
61,793,232
- - 61,793,232
(119,899)
(60,987,848)
(61,793,232)
58,500,000
1,637,497
758,092
271,850
220,595
- (61,512,945) -
1,000,000 (61,512,945) 61,793,232 3

8.1.d
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Mid Year 2023-24 List of Adjustments (FY 2023/24 Mid-Year Budget Report) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Jennifer Riedeman, Finance Director
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 9.1
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-08, confirming a report and assessment list under Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 704 and 243, for weed abatements (Lien Process)

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2024-08, confirming a report and assessment list under Ordinance No. 704 and 243, for weed abatements (Lien Process)

BACKGROUND
During the course of the year, Council approved Resolutions authorizing the city to abate weed at various locations. Many property owners either complied with the order or reimbursed the City for the work done. The City has not received payment from 1 property owner (see Exhibit A). Staff is requesting authorization from Council to have a lien placed on each property.

Authority to do so is granted in the City Municipal Code and by State Law. Upon Council approval, the necessary information will be forwarded to the County Recorder’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT
The balance of the unpaid reimbursements is $756.00.

9.1 Packet Pg. 74
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-08

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PATTERSON, CONFIRMING A REPORT AND ASSESSMENT LIST
UNDER ORDINANCE NOS. 704 and 243
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Patterson duly adopted Ordinance No. 704, and Ordinance No. 243 declaring all weeds, rubbish, dirt and rank growth of any kind as defined in the Ordinance on private property or in the street, alley or public right-of-way in the City of Patterson, to constitute a public nuisance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Patterson has duly adopted the following assessment list by Resolution hereby attached as Exhibit “A” and elected to proceed under Ordinance Nos. 704 and 243, and declared a public nuisance all weeds, rubbish, dirt and rank growth growing, located and existing upon the attached Exhibit “A” and all in the City of Patterson; and
WHEREAS, said resolution was adopted following the holding of a public hearing on Tuesday, February 20th, 2024 at which no objections to the proposed abatements were received; and
WHEREAS, Fire Marshal and Finance Director have mailed statements of the expenses proposed to be assessed against said property to each person to whom such property was assessed on the last equalized assessment roll and has included a “Notice – Attention Property Owner and Invoice” of the time and place set forth for the hearing of objections to the Report and of the proposed assessment, as in said Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk has posted on the bulletin board in City Hall a copy of the report and assessment list, together with a Notice of the time and place of said hearing, all as provided in said Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Patterson did hold a public hearing at the time and place set forth in said Notice for the purpose of hearing objections to said report and

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-08 Weed Abatements (Resolution No. 2024-08 Approved Property to be Lien for Unpaid Weed Abatements) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
proposed assessment, and no objections having been received.

WHEREAS, the Abatement of the nuisance has been completed and the appropriate party billed for the work. Payment has not been received from those listed on Exhibit A; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Patterson that the Report and Assessment for Weed, Dirt, Rubbish, and Rank Growth Abatement under Ordinance Nos. 704 and 243, of the City of Patterson submitted by the Fire Marshal and Finance Director of the City of Patterson, a copy of which is attached Exhibit “A” hereto and made a part hereof, is confirmed and the cost of the abatement with administrative fees against the following described property in the City of Patterson constitutes a special assessment against said parcels and is a lien on the parcel and an assessment to the Tax Roll in the amount set forth:

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution, together with the Report and Assessment for Weed, Dirt, Rubbish, and Rank Growth Abatement to the County Assessor and to the County Tax Collector of Stanislaus County, for entry upon and collection with the next tax roll upon which general municipal taxes are collected, all as provided in said Ordinance Nos. 704 and 243.

The foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson held on the 20th day of February 2024, by __________ who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by __________, and it was upon roll call carried and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-08 Weed Abatements (Resolution No. 2024-08 Approved Property to be Lien for Unpaid Weed Abatements) 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
APPROVED:
_____________________________________
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
__________________________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:
____________________________
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-08 Weed Abatements (Resolution No. 2024-08 Approved Property to be Lien for Unpaid Weed Abatements) City of Patterson
1 Plaza Circle
P. O. Box 667
Patterson, California 95363
(209) 895-8000

NOTICE TO LIEN PROPERTY
January 18, 2024
Enclosed please find the invoice for weed abatement. Please be advised that if this invoice remains outstanding by February 20th, 2024, the following will occur:

A lien in the amount of the invoice plus any additional fees, will be placed on the property.

Failure to pay this amount by February 20th, 2024 will result in a City Council Meeting to lien your property.

The invoice amount plus all additional fees, will be eligible for submission to the Stanislaus County Assessor’s Office for collection with the annual property tax bill, and will be forwared to that office for inclusion in the property tax bill.

Should you have any questions or require further information, please contact us at (209) 895-8051.

City of Patterson

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Notice To Lien Property 2-20-24 (Resolution No. 2024-08 Approved Property to be Lien for Unpaid Weed Abatements) Exhibit A

OWNER PROPERTY ADDRESS APN TOTAL DUE RESO TYPE
HERRERA, ENRIQUE 1444 MENDOCINO CREEK DR 021-064-046-000 $756.00 2023-53 WEED ABATEMENT

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Exhibit A (Resolution No. 2024-08 Approved Property to be Lien for Unpaid Weed City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Bryan Stice, Community Development Director
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 9.2
SUBJECT: Approve Resolution No. 2023-50, approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report and adopting updated development impact fees related to transportation, effective February 21, 2024, per Ordinance No. 608 (M.C. Section 3.64) (continued from February 6, 2024)

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve Resolution No. 2023-50, approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report and adopting updated development impact fees related to transportation, effective February 21, 2024, per Ordinance No. 608 (M.C. Section 3.64) (continued from February 6,2024)

BACKGROUND
The City of Patterson has adopted development impact fees in accordance with relevant provisions of Government Code §66000 et seq, to address the need for municipal facilities attributed to new development. Under State law, an impact fee must be reasonably related to the cost of the service provided by the local agency. These fees are only charged to and collected from new development within the city limits at the time of building permit issuance.

ANALYSIS
The City’s traffic engineer, Advanced Mobility Group have completed work on a Regional Transportation Impact Fee (TIF). The TIF considers roadway improvements identified in the 2010 General Plan and the Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan that are necessary to accommodate future expansion of the city. The TIF estimated funds necessary to accommodate and mitigate the impacts of future development. It should be noted that the TIF’s focus is on major intersections and roadways that serve a more regional need. Intersections and roadways

9.2 Packet Pg. 80
that primarily serve local needs would be paid for directly by a developer or through other financial measures. As a development impact fee, the TIF would only pay for the fair share impact of future development. Existing deficiencies would be required to be paid for through other methods.

Proposed Maximum Allowable Transportation Impact Fee
Residential Units Total TIF per Unit
Single Family $6,243
Medium Density - Single- Family $6,243
Medium Density - Multi-Family $3,531
High Density $3,011
Non-ResidentialTotal TIF per 1,000
square feet
Retail $8,637
Non-Residential Mixed Use $7,012
Office $6,515
Limited Industrial $4,560
General Industrial/Warehouse $2,968
Two significant changes have been made to the report since this item was last provided to the City Council. First, CalTrans has shared with City staff that they will be paying for the costs associated with improvements to the Highway 33/Sperry Avenue intersection, a cost that was previously expected to be borne by the city. As a result, those costs have been removed from the analysis and the fees have been reduced accordingly.

Second, a new category has been added, which divides the Medium Density fee into two subcategories - Single-Family and Multi-Family. Both categories are viable land-use options, however, according to studies performed by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) these land uses generate significantly different numbers of vehicle trips and, consequently, should be treated differently related to their transportation impacts. The fees have been divided between the two categories to reflect this difference.

FISCAL IMPACT
Costs associated with the impact fee study were budgeted in Transportation funds. The revenues generated by the updated fees shall be placed in impact fee funds. All impact fees are collected at the time a building permit is issued; therefore, the fiscal impact is unknown until development takes place. The approved fees would increase annually, effective January 1st of every year, by the San Francisco Bay Area’s CCI (Construction Cost Index).

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2023-50
City of Patterson Regional Transportation Impact Fee

9.2 Packet Pg. 81
RESOLUTION 2023-50

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON APPROVING THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION

IMPACT FEE REPORT AND ADOPTING TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

IMPACT FEES
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66000 et seq., known as the Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600), authorizes local agencies to collect fees to mitigate the impacts of new development for infrastructure improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Patterson has adopted ordinance No. 608 and resolutions establishing and revising Development Impact Fees required to be paid at the time a building permit is issued for new development, based on the San Francisco Bay Area’s Construction Cost Index (CCI); and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Patterson desires to encourage the construction of new development in the City of Patterson and to promote economic development; and WHEREAS, the City of Patterson Regional Transportation Impact Fee study was prepared pursuant to applicable state laws, the 2010 General Plan and General Plan EIR, and relevant master plans; and
WHEREAS, the impact fee program is not considered a project and is therefore exempt from review under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(4).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Patterson as follows:

1. The City Council of the City of Patterson hereby approves updated transportation impact fees effective after the adoption of this resolution, per State Law, Effective February 21, 2024, as described on exhibit A attached hereto and annual CCI annual increases based on the San Francisco Bay Area CCI, effective every January 1st.

2. That the City Manager, or his/her designee, is hereby authorized to execute all documents necessary to implement and secure payment.

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Resolution No-2023-50 Regional Transportation Impact Fee (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional APPROVED:
____
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:
______________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Resolution No-2023-50 Regional Transportation Impact Fee (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Regional Traffic
Impact Fee (TIF)
February 2, 2024
for the City of Patterson, CA

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional
Traffic Impact Fee (TIF)
Final Report
Prepared for:

City of Patterson
Prepared by:

Advanced Mobility Group
February 2, 2024

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 1 Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND RESULTS..................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................3 LEGAL CONTEXT ..........................................................................................................................3

2.0 FUTURE LAND USE ASSUMPTION..............................................................................................6 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND FORECAST ................................................................................6 TRAVEL DEMAND ASSUMPTIONS AND FORECASTS ..................................................................8

3.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS ..................................................................10 PROJECT SELECTION .................................................................................................................10 PROJECT LIST..............................................................................................................................10 FACILITY COST ESTIMATES .........................................................................................................10

4.0 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM FEE......................................................................................................11 OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS ..........................................................................................................11 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AND COST ALLOCATION..............................................................13 MAXIMUM FEE CALCULATION .................................................................................................15 REFERENCES .........................................................................................................................................17

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 2 LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Maximum Allowable Transportation Impact Fee .....................................................4 Table 2: General Plan Land Use Assumptions and Forecasts ................................................7 Table 3: Trip Generation Rate Assumptions.............................................................................8 Table 4: Trip Generation Projections.........................................................................................9 Table 5: Summary of TIF Projects and Costs...........................................................................11 Table 6: TIF Travel Demand Assumptions ...............................................................................14 Table 7: TIF Cost Allocation Assumptions and Calculations.................................................15 Table 8: Maximum Fee per Trip ...............................................................................................15 Table 9: Maximum TIF Schedule..............................................................................................16

LIST OF APPENDICES
DETAILED TIF PROJECT LIST AND COSTS ESTIMATES ................................. A.1

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND RESULTS

INTRODUCTION
The Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) provides the City of Patterson (City) with the necessary technical documentation to support the adoption of a new Citywide Transportation Impact Fee Program (TIF Program). Impact fees are one-time charges on new development that the City can collect to cover the cost of impact on capital facilities and infrastructure that are required to serve new growth.1 Typically such fees are collected upon issuance of a building permit.

The City adopted a 2010 General Plan update in July 2010. The General Plan identifies roadway and infrastructure mitigation measures to accommodate the projected traffic impact due to the buildout of future land use in the City. In anticipation of funding required to build those future infrastructure improvements, the City completed the Patterson Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan (TIMP) project in 2020. The goal of the TIMP is an attempt to identify Patterson’s existing and future roadway infrastructure problem areas and potential solutions that may occur through a combination of public and private infrastructure investments.

The main purpose of this TIF is to estimate funds needed to implement key transportation improvements necessary to accommodate and mitigate the impacts of future development in the City. To support the TIF program, the City prepare this Nexus Study that will provide a legal basis for requiring development impact fees consistent with Mitigation Fee Act (AB 1600/ Government Code Section 66000 et seq.).

The Fee Program described in this TIF Study is based on growth projections and transportation infrastructure requirements identified in the General Plan, TIMP and supporting documents (e.g., GP Environmental Impact Report). This TIF Study quantifies the potential allocation of the proposed transportation improvements to new growth in the City and calculates the maximum allowable transportation impact fee schedule by land use category. The City may decide to adopt fees below the maximum supportable level based on economic or policy considerations. Such fee reductions should be considered in conjunction with the availability of other sources of capital improvement funding.

LEGAL CONTEXT
This TIF Study is designed to provide the necessary technical analysis to support a schedule of transportation impact fees to be established by an Impact Fee Act Fee Ordinance and Resolution. The Mitigation Fee Act allows the City to adopt, by resolution, the Transportation Impact Fee consistent with the supporting technical analysis and findings provided in this report. Using the Resolution approach to setting the fee allows periodic adjustments of the fee amount that may be necessary over time, without having to amend the ordinance.

Traffic impact fees could be collected and used to cover the cost of constructing capital and infrastructure improvements to serve new development and growth in the City. Therefore, these impact fees must be based on a reasonable connection or nexus between new growth and development and the need for such improvement. As such traffic impact fees cannot be used to cover the operation and maintenance costs of these or any other facilities and infrastructure. Lastly, traffic impact fees cannot be collected or used to cover the cost of existing needs/ deficiencies in the City transportation capital improvement network.

In establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition for the approval of a development project, Government Code 66001(a) and (b) state that the local agency must:
1 Assumed to include any development activity (as defined in the study) that generates new traffic impacts on the City’s transportation infrastructure when completed

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 4 1. Identify the purpose of the fee;

2. Identify how the fee is to be used;

3. Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the fee use and type of development project for which the fee is being used;

4. Determine how the need for the public facility relates to the type of development project for which the fee is imposed; and

5. Show the relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility.

These statutory requirements have been followed in establishing this TIF.

Once the TIF is adopted, this TIF Study and the accompanying technical information should be maintained and reviewed periodically to ensure Impact Fee accuracy and to ensure the adequate programming of funding sources. As necessary, any changes to costs due to development changes over time, then the TIF will need to be updated.

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FEE SCHEDULE
Table 1 shows the City’s maximum traffic impact fee schedule by land use consistent with nexus requirements. These traffic impact fees apply to new residential and nonresidential development and cover the transportation improvement costs required to support new development after existing deficiencies have been taken into account. The fee estimates also include a 2 percent fee program administration fee, consistent with Mitigation Fee Act program administrative costs in many other California jurisdictions.2 The fees apply to all new development, except those exempted by the Ordinance of other means, such as approved projects under the terms of a Development Agreement.3 The adoption of the recommended fee schedule would result in fee revenues of about $197.9 million in today’s dollar terms assuming full build-out of the General Plan consistent with current land use designations. An additional $179.9 million in revenues will be required from other funding sources to cover the full cost of the transportation facilities4 included in the fee calculations. That is, the TIF is estimated to generate approximately 52 percent of the revenue needed to cover the future transportation improvements and facilities costs identified to mitigate growth impacts associated with build-out of the General Plan.

Table 1: Maximum Allowable Transportation Impact Fee
2 The 2 percent administration cost is estimated to cover expenses related development of impact fee study and subsequent updates as well as the required reporting, auditing, collection and other annual administrative costs involved in overseeing the program. It is consistent with TIF programs throughout California.
3 Includes Villages of Patterson, Arambell Development and Remains of West Patterson Business Park 4 City of Patterson Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan Residential Units (du)
Total TIF
per Unit
Single Family $6,243
Medium Density - Single Family $6,243
- Multi-Family $3,531
High Density $3,011
Non-residential (ksf)
Retail $8,637
Non-Residential Mixed Use $7,012
Office $6,515
Limited Industrial $4,560
General Industrial/Warehouse $2,968

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 5 KEY ISSUES AND ASSUMPTIONS
The results of this analysis are based on a variety of conditions and assumptions regarding infrastructure costs, land use growth projections, and transportation demand. These assumptions are discussed later but some of the key issues are summarized below:
• Future Development and Trips. The fee calculations were based on residential and nonresidential development projections, and associated trip generation. Land use and cost information are based on the approved 2010 General Plan, recently approved projects and TIMP information. In addition, the StanCOG Travel Demand model was utilized to conduct travel demand analysis. • Capital Improvement Program. The list of transportation improvements included in the Fee Program focuses on future projects identified in the approved TIMP report. • Cost Estimates. AMG has developed or updated cost estimates based on latest available Caltrans unit cost for all TIMP transportation improvement projects identified. The cost estimates were based on assumptions about the planned right-of-way, number of lanes, cross-sections and intersection control for each improvement. Assumptions were based on similar existing corridors within the City of Patterson, input from the County, consistent with the City’s roadway design standards and have been reviewed and confirmed by City staff. • Cost Allocation. Transportation analysis conducted by AMG (including Select Link Analysis) was used to determine the portion of transportation improvements costs to be included in the fee program. Only transportation improvement costs specifically required to support new development are included in the transportation impact fee calculation.

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 6 2.0 FUTURE LAND USE ASSUMPTION
This chapter documents the land use and growth assumptions and forecasts used in this study. These assumptions determine the amount of future traffic generation and attraction in the City of Patterson which are key factors in determining how to allocate new transportation improvement costs between existing and various new development land uses in the future.

LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND FORECAST
The existing and future City of Patterson land use estimates used in the TIF are based on several sources including the 2010 General Plan (approved in July 2010), three major approved project land uses, and more recent land use updates provided by the City5. Based on discussions with City staff6, three major approved projects included are:
• West Patterson Business Park Master Plan was approved in 2003 – Originally approved for approximately 8.5 million sf light industrial, freeway commercial, R&D and residential.

Approximately 5 million sf available.
• Villages of Patterson was approved in 2007 – 3,100 dwelling units and 1.1 million sf of light industrial, office, retail and public use. Only elementary school on Hartley Avenue has been completed.
• West Patterson Business Park Expansion was approved in 2012 –11 million sf light industrial, 839 ksf business park & 198 ksf business park. 1.5M sf distribution center has been developed.

Trips to be generated by the three approved and yet to be developed projects would be considered in future traffic forecasts. However, since future potential impacts and mitigation measures have been considered and approved by Council in Development Agreements (DA), these future trips would not be considered a part of the TIF developed in this study.

The future buildout of the remaining General Plan land use includes Zacharias/Baldwin Master Plan and Non-Committed land use in the City. The TIF would be based on these two major land uses which will generate future traffic and impacts on City transportation infrastructure.

The buildout potential of Zacharias/Baldwin Master Plan consists of:
• 5,086 dwelling units, and
• 7,765,000 square feet of non-residential uses.

The buildout potential of Non-Committed land use in the City is estimated to include:
• 15,201 dwelling units, and
• 9,988 square feet of non-residential uses.

The City of Patterson land use growth projections are used in the travel demand model based on Stanislaus Council of Government (StanCOG) model to estimate future regional travel demand based on various assumptions as it relates to roadway network and trip rates by land use category in the City and the rest of Stanislaus County. The StanCOG model used is the current 2022 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) model which has 2019 as the base year and 2046 future year.

The current and future year land use assumptions used the forecasting model are shown in Table 2. 5 Email from City staff, December 7, 2021
6 Email from City staff, August 05, 2019

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 7 Table 2: General Plan Land Use Assumptions and Forecasts Major land use category assumptions based on Institute of Engineers (ITE) are summarized in Table 2 are categorized as follows:
• Single-Family Residential: This refers to detached single-family homes. Traffic impact fees for new single-family residential development are applied on a per unit basis. It is noted that the medium density land use category includes some single-family units. Recent development trends indicated nearly two-thirds of medium density developments are single family units. • Multifamily Residential (Low-Rise): This category covers apartments, townhomes, condos, duplexes and other multifamily housing and that have one or two levels. Traffic impact fees for new construction of this type of residential development are applied on a per unit basis. • Multifamily Residential (Mid-Rise): This category covers apartments, townhomes, condos, duplexes and other multifamily housing and that have three or more levels. Traffic impact fees for new construction of this type of residential development are applied on a per unit basis. • Retail: Retail development can include shopping centers, discount stores, nurseries, factory outlets, car sale lots, convenient stores, and specialty stores. Traffic impact fees for new construction of this type of development are applied on a square footage basis. • Mixed-Use: This assumed a mix of general offices, including professional and medical office and retail development that could include shopping centers and convenient stores. Traffic impact fees for new construction of this type of development are applied on a square footage basis. • Office: This category covers general offices, including professional and medical office development, government offices, and post offices. Traffic impact fees for this type of development are applied on a square footage basis.
• Limited Industrial: It is typically a free-standing facility devoted to a single use. The facility has an emphasis on activities other than manufacturing and typically has minimal office space. Typical light industrial activities include printing, material testing, and assembly of data processing 2019 Approved
Land Use
Zacharias
Master
Plan
NonCommittedFuture
Total
TIF Growth
(2019-
2046)
Residential Units (du)
Single Family 6,000 0 831 794 1,625 1,625
Medium Density - Single Family 450 1,913 2,432 9,609 13,954 12,041 - Multi-Family 955 1,214 4,797 6,967 6,012
High Density 100 232 609 841 609
Subtotal 6,550 3,100 5,086 15,201 23,387 20,287
Non-residential (ksf)
Retail 602 1,970 350 1,292 3,612 1,642
Non-Residential Mixed Use 0 505 2,551 3,056 3,056
Office 307 0 1,763 1,763 1,763
Limited Industrial 730 6,143 6,910 1,204 14,257 8,114
Warehouse 100 6,556 6,556 0
General Industrial/Warehouse 6,000 6,122 3,178 9,300 3,178 Subtotal 7,739 20,791 7,765 9,988 38,544 17,753
Buildout 2046

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 8 equipment. Traffic impact fees for this type of development are applied on a square footage basis.
• Warehouse: Primarily devoted to the storage of materials, but it may also include office and maintenance areas. Traffic impact fees for this type of development are applied on a square footage basis.
• General Industrial/Warehouse: This is a mix of land uses with general industrial and warehouse activities. Traffic impact fees for this type of development are applied on a square footage basis.

TRAVEL DEMAND ASSUMPTIONS AND FORECASTS
The model was used to estimate future regional travel demand based on various assumptions as it relates to roadway network and trip rates by land use category in the City and the rest of Stanislaus County. The trip generation used in the 2022 RTP Model was developed using total population, households, and employment projections. The land use categories and trip generation for the City of Patterson as shown in Table 2 are based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation7 and further refined through model trip lengths and citywide data.

Using some of the model trip length assumptions, the resulting trip demand factors are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Trip Generation Rate Assumptions
Table 4 combines the growth estimates summarized in Table 2 and the travel demand assumptions presented in Table 3 to estimate the total growth in trips through build-out of the General Plan which included three major approved projects mentioned earlier. As shown, this approach results in an estimated growth of 29,215 PM peak hour trips per day, which represents approximately a doubling increase over existing levels.
7 ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, 2017
Type Description Total Land Use
Remaining
Primary
Trips 1
Diverted
Trips 1
Total
Excluding
Pass-by 1
Ave. Trip
Length 2
Adjustment
Factor 3 ITE Code Description Raw Rate
PM
Ave. Rate
PM 4
Trip
Demand
Factor 5
R-L SF Low Density 2,651 86% 11% 97% 14.1 0.9 Single Family Detached (210) 0.99 0.99 0.90 R-M SF Medium Density 2,754 86% 11% 97% 14.1 0.9 Multifamily (220) 0.56 0.56 0.51 R-MH SF Medium High Density 2,361 86% 11% 97% 15.3 1.0 Multifamily Midrise (221) 0.44 0.44 0.44 C/G General/Shopping Center 980,020 47% 31% 78% 12.6 0.7 Shopping Center (820) 3.61 1.91 1.25 MX Non-Residential Mixed Use 2,313,036 62% 25% 87% 14.3 0.8 Mix Office/Shopping (710/820) 2.38 1.22 1.01 C/O Office 490,490 77% 19% 96% 12.8 0.8 Office (710) 1.15 1.15 0.94 I/L Limited Industrial 3,114,557 100% 0% 100% 15.7 1.0 General Lt Ind.l (110) 0.63 0.63 0.66 I/G Warehouse 1,402,502 100% 0% 100% 15.7 1.0 Warehouse (150) 0.19 0.19 0.20 I/G General Industrial/Warehouse 1,402,504 100% 0% 100% 15.7 1.0 Mix Lt Ind./Wrhs (110,150) 0.41 0.41 0.43 Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Note:
1 - Primary trips are direct trips to destination with no midway stops; Diverted trips are linked trips that adds at least one mile to the primary trip. Pass-by trips do not add more than one mile. 2 - Average trip length for the City are derived from the StanCOG model. Mixed Use is average of Retail and Office use. 3 - The trip adjustment factor equals the percent of non-pass-by trips multiplied by the average trip length and divided by the systemwide average trip length of 14.99 mile 4 - ITE Code: ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition, 2017; trips per dwelling unit or per ksf 5 - The trip demand factor is the product of the trip adjustment factor and the average PM trips.

Addtional Reference: San Diego Association of the Goverments, Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Regions, April 2002

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 9 Table 4: Trip Generation Projections

Residential Units (du) Units Trips Units Trips
Single Family 0.90 6,000 5,420 1,625 1,468
Medium Density - Single Family 0.90 450 406 12,041 10,877 - Multi-Family 0.51 6,012 3,072
High Density 0.44 100 44 609 265
Subtotal 6,550 5,870 20,287 15,682
Non-residential (ksf)
Retail 1.25 602 752 1,642 2,053
Non-Residential Mixed Use 1.01 0 0 3,056 3,100
Office 0.94 307 289 1,763 1,662
Limited Industrial 0.66 730 482 8,114 5,354
Warehouse 0.20 100 20 0 0
General Industrial/Warehouse 0.43 6,000 2,577 3,178 1,365 Subtotal 7,739 15,859 17,753 13,533
Grand Total 21,729 29,215
2046 Buildout (TIF
Only Trips) 2019 Trip
Demand
Factor 1
Note:
1 - Final PM peak hour trips (per DU or ksf).

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 10 3.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND COSTS
This chapter describes the major roadway improvement projects proposed for the City of Patterson as well as their cost estimates. The following chapter discusses the nexus-based cost allocations.

PROJECT SELECTION
The list of infrastructure improvement projects used in the development of traffic impact fees are derived from the Patterson Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan (TIMP) project which was completed in 2020. 8 Estimated costs for the list of infrastructure improvement projects to accommodate new growth were reviewed by City staff at that time including recent review and updates. These capital improvements projects included in the fee program were developed based on conceptual plans and have been developed in sufficient detail to generate good cost estimates.

The list of transportation projects identified in TIMP is the primary basis and did not include the following:
• The TIF program does not include any projects that are outside of the sphere of influence of the City of Patterson.
• The TIF program does not include any projects where secured and dedicated funding sources have already been established to cover the full cost such as those in the Development Agreements.

PROJECT LIST
As part of the Patterson TIMP Study, the City prepared a preliminary conceptual improvement list, as shown in Table 5. The improvements included in the list cover the intersections/segments where significant impact(s) were identified. Particularly, it is assumed that significant cost could be expected at railroad crossings.

None of the projects included in the TIF addresses existing deficiencies. Rather, they are a response to new development and limited to intersections currently operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS) within City’s standards (LOS D) but are expected to deteriorate to below City’ LOS standards with proposed new developments.

FACILITY COST ESTIMATES
The cost estimates shown in Table 5 above are based on assumptions about the planned right-of-way, roadway cross-sections for each corridor. Assumptions were based on similar existing corridors within the City of Patterson and boundary roadways with the County and have been reviewed and confirmed by City staff. Detailed cost estimate sheets for each project are attached to this report as Appendix A. 8 City of Patterson Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan, Final Report, March 6, 2020

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 11 4.0 ESTIMATED MAXIMUM FEE
This chapter presents calculations for the maximum allowable TIF based on the land use projections and estimated transportation improvements cost and its nexus.

OVERVIEW OF FINDINGS
As indicated in the introduction, a “nexus” between new development in City of Patterson and its impact on the transportation improvements and their associated costs must be made before assigning a certain transportation improvement cost into a transportation impact fee calculation. Several necessary steps were taken to determine the appropriate costs to include in the new TIF calculation:
• Estimate Total Costs of Transportation Improvements. The identification of the required transportation improvement projects and their associated costs updates are based on the TIMP and key projects.
• Remove existing deficiencies. This includes evaluation of whether there is an existing deficiency at any of the project locations and the level of that deficiency. • Estimate Proportionate Allocation to New Development. Determine the proportion of the transportation improvement project cost that could be assigned to new development in Patterson after removing any existing deficiencies.
• Deduct Known Funding from Total Cost. Any dedicated funding should be deducted from the transportation fee calculation.

Table 5: Summary of TIF Projects and Costs
I. Roadway Segment Length
(mi)
Cost Estimate
1 Sperry Ave I-5 NB Ramps to Baldwin Rd 1.21 $14,071,888 2 Sperry Ave Ward Ave to SR 33 0.85 $10,786,143
3 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to American Eagle Way 0.80 $6,414,628 4 Ward Ave American Eagle Way to SR 33 0.91 $6,702,419
5 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to Marshall Rd 2.00 $20,374,982
6 Baldwin Rd Keystone Pacific Way to SR 33 2.65 $30,473,386 7 Rogers Rd Sperry Ave to SR 33 4.55 $52,862,858
8 Zacharias Rd Rogers Rd to SR 33 1.89 $30,666,448
9 SR 33 Rogers Rd to Walnut Ave 4.36 $54,069,576
10 SR 33 Sperry Ave to Pomelo Ave 1.40 $17,567,994
11 Walnut Ave SR 33 to Sycamore Ave 1.04 $7,814,730
12 Sycamore Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave 2.08 $14,603,909 13 Elm Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave 2.08 $16,026,134 II. Interchange
14 Sperry Ave/I-5 Interchange A $18,080,640
15 Zacharias Ave/I-5 Interchange B $77,400,000
Total $377,915,736
Note:

County staff input - extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection). And 40% increase to reflect ENR Construction Cost Index. Email from City to County staff, Thur, April 7, 2022 A - Based on I-5/Sperry Ave Interchange Improvements Project, April 20, 2017 & assumed 20% increase B - Information provided by city staff based on estimates (March 22, 2022) Assumed the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers increased 3.2 percent from July 2022 to July 2023.

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 12 The steps described above and explained in subsequent sections establish the following TIF nexus findings, consistent with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

Purpose
The fee will ensure adequate levels of transportation service as contemplated in the General Plan are maintained in Patterson.

Use of Fee
Revenue generated by the fee will be used to fund City transportation improvements, including roadway, intersection, multi-modal and traffic signal improvements. The list of eligible transportation projects and costs are summarized in Table 5 and further detailed in Appendix A.

Established Relationship
As discussed previously, new development in the City of Patterson will increase traffic demands on the City’s transportation network. Estimated transportation fee revenue will be used to fund transportation improvements required to maintain acceptable levels of service. New developments will benefit from the increased transportation capacity.

Need
Future new development projects will add traffic and create an incremental need for transportation capacity and improvements. The transportation improvements detailed in this study are considered necessary to meet the City's future transportation needs.

Proportionality
The fee levels are estimated using fair share cost allocations for new Citywide development based on the StanCOG 2022 RTP transportation model adapted for this study.

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 13 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL AND COST ALLOCATION
Travel Demand Model Assumptions and Methodology
The StanCOG countywide travel demand model with refined traffic analysis zones (TAZ) and land use estimates for the City of Patterson was developed for the study. The refinement of the travel demand model was taken to allocate TIF program costs equitably. The StanCOG model is a mathematical representation of travel demand based on the buildout of all of the cities within Stanislaus County, including Patterson. The model uses socioeconomic data, such as number of jobs and households, for different geographic areas (transportation analysis zones) to predict the expected travel between places in the future.

AMG used an adopted model which was validated for the current socioeconomic data to predict current traffic volume, which is matched with the existing counts to calibrate the model. The calibrated model was used to forecast future travel conditions based on the expected changes in the socioeconomic conditions in the future. There are 80 transportation analysis zones (TAZ) within the StanCOG model to represent the City. The 2046 socioeconomic data are generated by StanCOG based on input from all cities in the County. In order to determine appropriate nexus, AMG further refined the model to derive both average citywide and link-specific characteristics of vehicle travel demand including the following:
• Internal (trips that start and end in Patterson)
• Internal/External (trips that have one end either beginning or ending in Patterson) • Through (trips that pass completely through Patterson without stopping) Only the trips originating and ending in Patterson (i.e., Internal trips and Internal/External trips) would be responsible for the TIF fees.

The average citywide characteristics of vehicle travel demand for TIF roadways are shown in Table 6.

These methodologies would be applied to determine the percentage of the project costs that could be funded through the TIF program. Select link methodology was used on the model for allocation and applied as follows:
• Select Link - the cost allocation would be based on link-specific characteristics of vehicle travel demand for the project-related segment (I.e., all the approaching and departure roadway segments of the intersection). The traffic model was used to estimate travel demand characteristics associated with specific transportation improvements as shown in Table 6.

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 14 Table 6: TIF Travel Demand Assumptions
As shown in Table 6, using the model Select Link analysis, the proportion of transportation improvement costs allocated to new development varies by facility or improvement. Generally, approximately seven percent to 10 percent of the trips using the approaching or departure roadway segments of the intersection would pass through Patterson without stopping.

TIF Cost Allocation
The TIF nexus analysis allocates costs based on (1) the amount attributable to new versus existing development, (2) the proportion of trips with at least one trip end in the City (i.e. excludes through trips), and (3) the amount covered by secured funding sources. As described in Chapter 3, none of the projects included in the TIF address existing deficiencies. Rather, they are a response to new development and limited to roadways currently operating at a level of service (LOS) within City’s acceptable LOS D or better standards but are expected to deteriorate to unacceptable LOS standards with proposed new developments.

It should be noted that trips from the three major approved projects (West Patterson Business Park Master Plan, Villages of Patterson and West Patterson Business Park Expansion) which has an approved Development Agreement (DA) were not included in the TIF allocation. The cost allocated to future new development (Zacharias/Baldwin Master Plan and Non-Committed land use) are based on the analysis described above and summarized in Table 6.

Table 7 illustrates the net impact of the cost allocations described above. Overall, this TIF analysis allocates approximately $197.9 million in transportation improvement cost to the TIF. The amount represents about 52 percent of the approximately $377.9 million in future transportation infrastructure costs considered in this analysis.

Roadway Segment I-I I-X X-I X-X Cost Allocation
Methodology
Percent TIF
Projects A
Share Allocated to
New Development
1 Sperry Ave I-5 NB Ramps to Baldwin Rd 19% 28% 37% 16% Select Link 51% 43% 2 Sperry Ave Ward Ave to SR 33 1% 49% 47% 2% Select Link 46% 45% 3 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to American Eagle Way 14% 24% 45% 16% Select Link 48% 40% 4 Ward Ave American Eagle Way to SR 33 14% 24% 45% 16% Select Link 48% 40% 5 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to Marshall Rd 11% 36% 40% 13% Select Link 43% 37% 6 Baldwin Rd Keystone Pacific Way to SR 33 1% 49% 50% 0% Select Link 29% 29% 7 Rogers Rd Sperry Ave to SR 33 5% 40% 55% 0% Select Link 86% 86% 8 Zacharias Rd Rogers Rd to SR 33 27% 32% 40% 0% Select Link 88% 87% 9 SR 33 Rogers Rd to Walnut Ave 0% 38% 44% 17% Select Link 22% 18% 10 SR 33 Sperry Ave to Pomelo Ave 0% 48% 43% 8% Select Link 36% 34% 11 Walnut Ave SR 33 to Sycamore Ave 56% 21% 22% 1% Select Link 21% 21% 12 Sycamore Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave 4% 39% 44% 12% Select Link 56% 49% 13 Elm Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave 0% 42% 47% 10% Select Link 68% 61% 14 Sperry Ave I-5 Interchange Ramp 0% 40% 50% 10% Select Link 72% 65% 15 Zacharias Rd New Interchange 0% 58% 41% 0% Select Link 59% 59% Note:

A - only trips by Zacharias Master Plan & Non-Committed Land Use Trip Types

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 15 Table 7: TIF Cost Allocation Assumptions and Calculations

MAXIMUM FEE CALCULATION
Based on the estimated TIF transportation improvement cost as shown in Table 7, the maximum supportable transportation impact fee per trip is shown in Table 8. The maximum fee per trip is calculated by dividing the estimated total TIF fee program cost of $197.9 million by the total number of trips generated by new TIF related development, or 29,215 (see Table 4). This results in an average TIF per peak hour trip of $6,776.

Table 8: Maximum Fee per Trip
Finally, Table 9 calculates the maximum TIF for several land use categories shown in the General Plan. As typically applied in most agencies, the maximum allowable TIF by land use includes a 2 percent charge to cover the administrative cost of administering the TIF program. The maximum supportable fees are the fee levels that would generate sufficient fee revenues to cover the full TIF cost allocation of $197.9 million. As discussed below, decisions to charge fees below the maximum fee will result in funding gaps that would need to be covered by other funding sources.

Roadway Segment Total Project Cost
Share Allocated
to TIF
Development
Cost Allocated to
TIF
1 Sperry Ave I-5 NB Ramps to Baldwin Rd $14,071,888 43% $6,031,282 2 Sperry Ave Ward Ave to SR 33 $10,786,143 45% $4,884,512 3 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to American Eagle Way $6,414,628 40% $2,589,819 4 Ward Ave American Eagle Way to SR 33 $6,702,419 40% $2,706,011 5 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to Marshall Rd $20,374,982 37% $7,609,881 6 Baldwin Rd Keystone Pacific Way to SR 33 $30,473,386 29% $8,939,686 7 Rogers Rd Sperry Ave to SR 33 $52,862,858 86% $45,484,575 8 Zacharias Rd Rogers Rd to SR 33 $30,666,448 87% $26,813,568 9 SR 33 Rogers Rd to Walnut Ave $54,069,576 18% $9,893,075 # SR 33 Sperry Ave to Pomelo Ave $17,567,994 34% $5,885,811 # Walnut Ave SR 33 to Sycamore Ave $7,814,730 21% $1,637,348 # Sycamore Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave $14,603,909 49% $7,160,725 # Elm Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave $16,026,134 61% $9,785,011 Sperry Ave/I-5 Interchange A $18,080,640 72% $13,035,887 Zacharias Ave/I-5 Interchange B $77,400,000 59% $45,501,109 Total - Citywide TIMP Transportation Projects $377,915,736 $197,958,300 Interchange
Note:

A – Based on I-5/Sperry Ave Interchange Improvements Project, April 20, 2017 & assumed 20% increase B - Information provided by city staff based on estimates (March 22, 2022) Category Formula Amount
TIF Share of Transportation Cost A $197,958,300
Total Growth PM Trips B 29,215
Cost per Trip (A/B) $6,776

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 16 Table 9: Maximum TIF Schedule
Typical Approval Process
The TIF and corresponding fee schedule will need to be adopted by City Resolution and Ordinance.

When adopted, the City TIF Ordinance will allow the City Council to collect a fee schedule consistent with supporting technical analysis and findings provided in this Report. The Ordinance approach to setting the TIF fee allows for periodic adjustments of the fee amount that may be necessary over time, without amending the enabling Ordinance.

Fee Amount and Collection
The actual fee levels by land use will need to be approved by the City Council but cannot exceed the maximum allowable fees calculated herein (AB 1600).

While the maximum fee amount has been determined by this study, the City may elect to charge less for a variety of valid reasons. The study recommended an amount depending on the type of land use, as described above.

In the course of implementation, it is likely certain projects may not fit neatly into the land use categories defined in the fee schedule (see Table 9). When this happens, the City Manager or an authorized representative will need to make a determination as to the applicable fees. The TIF Ordinance can provide more specific guidelines for resolving such uncertainty. For example, it may include the option for applicants to furnish information or analysis that will justify their project’s inclusion in a particular land use category and/or a lower fee based on verifiable trip generation rates or other factors.

Residential Units (du)
Cost Per
Trip
Trip Demand
Factor 1 Raw Fee
Admin
Charge 2 TIF Unit Cost
Single Family $6,776 0.90 $6,121 2% $6,243
Medium Density - Single Family $6,776 0.90 $6,121 2% $6,243 - Multi-Family $6,776 0.51 $3,462 2% $3,531
High Density $6,776 0.44 $2,952 2% $3,011
Non-residential (ksf)
Retail $6,776 1.25 $8,468 2% $8,637
Non-Residential Mixed Use $6,776 1.01 $6,875 2% $7,012
Office $6,776 0.94 $6,388 2% $6,515
Limited Industrial $6,776 0.66 $4,471 2% $4,560
Warehouse $6,776 0.20
General Industrial/Warehouse $6,776 0.43 $2,910 2% $2,968 Note:
1 - Final PM peak hour trips (per DU or ksf).
2 - Typical administrative charge of 2.0 percent of "raw" TIF (e.g. revenue collection, mandated public reporting, and Nexus Analysis).

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson Regional Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) February 2, 2024 17 REFERENCES

1. 2010 Patterson General Plan Environmental Impact Report, July 2010

2. City of Patterson Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan, March 6, 2020

3. Trip Generation, 10th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Advanced Mobility Group
Christopher Thnay, PE, AICP Principal/Project Manager
Joy Bhattacharya, PE, PTOE QA/QC
Shruti Shrivastava Project Engineer
Lawrence Liao Elite Transportation Group
Persons Consulted
Ken Irwin, PE City Manager, City of Patterson
Joel Andrews City Planner, City of Patterson

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report)

CITY OF PATTERSON REGIONAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE (TIF)
Appendix A Detailed TIF Project List and Costs Estimates February 2, 2024
A.1

DETAILED TIF PROJECT LIST AND COSTS ESTIMATES

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: R 020224 Patterson TIF Final (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional Transportation Impact Fee Report) City of Patterson
Patterson TIF Study
Transportation Infrastructure Master Plan (TIMP)
Buildout Roadway Improvement Cost Estimates
2/2/2024
Table 5: Summary of TIF Projects and Costs CPI 2023 increase = 3.2% I. Roadway Segment Length
(mi) Cost Estimate
1Sperry Ave I-5 NB Ramps to Baldwin Rd 1.21 $14,071,888 2Sperry Ave Ward Ave to SR 33 0.85 $10,786,143
3 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to American Eagle Way 0.80 $6,414,628 4 Ward Ave American Eagle Way to SR 33 0.91 $6,702,419
5 Ward Ave Sperry Ave to Marshall Rd 2.00 $20,374,982
6 Baldwin Rd Keystone Pacific Way to SR 33 2.65 $30,473,386 7 Rogers Rd Sperry Ave to SR 33 4.55 $52,862,858
8 Zacharias Rd Rogers Rd to SR 33 1.89 $30,666,448
9 SR 33 Rogers Rd to Walnut Ave 4.36 $54,069,576
10 SR 33 Sperry Ave to Pomelo Ave 1.40 $17,567,994
11 Walnut Ave SR 33 to Sycamore Ave 1.04 $7,814,730
12 Sycamore Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave 2.08 $14,603,909 13 Elm Ave Eucalyptus Ave to Orange Ave 2.08 $16,026,134 II. Interchange
14 Sperry Ave/I-5 Interchange A $18,080,640
15 Zacharias Ave/I-5 Interchange B $77,400,000
Total $377,915,736
13 12
Note:

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 1
Sperry Avenue: I-5 Northbound Ramps to Baldwin Road
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $110,000 $110,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 39,000 $4 $156,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 128,000 $20 $2,560,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 13,000 $200 $2,600,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 128,000 $12 $1,536,000
10 Manhole EA 12 $9,500 $114,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 50 $3,000 $150,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 2,500 $200 $500,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Install Traffic Signal LS $500,000 $0
15 Structures LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 412,000 $2.87 $1,182,440
Legend: Subtotal $10,908,440
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $2,727,110
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $13,635,550
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $13,635,550
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $14,071,888
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

And 40% increase to reflect ENR Construction Cost Index. Email from City to County staff, Thur, 10/4/2023
Z:\P2108275 - Patterson Regional TIF (Patterson)\2021 TIF Cost Estimates (T5)\2021 unit cost update (+Railroad crossing increase)\Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2023 TIF Table 5 100423 Final

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 2/2/2024
Segment # 2
Sperry Avenue: Ward to SR 33
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $70,000 $70,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 27,000 $4 $108,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 90,000 $20 $1,800,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 13,000 $200 $2,600,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 90,000 $12 $1,080,000
10 Manhole EA 10 $9,500 $95,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 40 $3,000 $120,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 2,000 $200 $400,000 13 Railroad crossing improvements LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 14 Install Traffic Signal LS 2 $500,000 $1,000,000
15 Railroad crossing improvements LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 336,000 $2.87 $964,320
Legend: Subtotal $12,237,320
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $3,059,330
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $15,296,650
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $15,296,650
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $10,786,143
Reduced $5M based on Ken's Dec 20, 2023 email.

Caltrans to perform all work, feasibility, and design for the Sperry Avenue/Hwy 33.

Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection). And 40% increase to reflect ENR Construction Cost Index. Email from City to County staff, Thur, April 7, 1/30/2024
Z:\P2108275 - Patterson Regional TIF (Patterson)\2023 TIF Cost Estimates (T5)\2021 unit cost update (+Railroad crossing increase)\Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF Table 5 013024 Final

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 3
Ward Avenue: Sperry Avenue to American Eagle Way
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $57,000 $57,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 26,000 $4 $104,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 42,000 $20 $840,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 9,000 $200 $1,800,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 84,000 $12 $1,008,000
10 Manhole EA 8 $9,500 $76,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 32 $3,000 $96,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 1,600 $200 $320,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Modify Traffic Signal LS $100,000 $0
15 $0
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 234,000 $2.87 $671,580
Legend: Subtotal $4,972,580
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $1,243,145
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $6,215,725
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $6,215,725
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $6,414,628
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 4
Ward Avenue: American Eagle Way to SR 33
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $64,000 $64,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 27,200 $4 $108,800
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 45,000 $20 $900,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 9,600 $200 $1,920,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 80,000 $12 $960,000
10 Manhole EA 9 $9,500 $85,500
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 36 $3,000 $108,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 1,800 $200 $360,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Modify Traffic Signal LS $100,000 $0
15 $0
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 240,200 $2.87 $689,374
Legend: Subtotal $5,195,674
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $1,298,919
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $6,494,593
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $6,494,593
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $6,702,419
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 5 (4 lanes)
Ward Avenue: Sperry Avenue to Marshall Road
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $150,000 $150,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 64,000 $4 $256,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 212,000 $20 $4,240,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 22,000 $200 $4,400,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 212,000 $12 $2,544,000
10 Manhole EA 20 $9,500 $190,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 80 $3,000 $240,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 4,000 $200 $800,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Modify Traffic Signal LS $100,000 $0
15 Structure LS 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 688,000 $2.87 $1,974,560
Legend: Subtotal $15,794,560
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $3,948,640
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $19,743,200
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $19,743,200
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $20,374,982
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 6
Baldwin Road: Keystone Pacific Way to SR 33
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $180,000 $180,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 84,000 $4 $336,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 280,000 $20 $5,600,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 32,000 $200 $6,400,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 280,000 $12 $3,360,000
10 Manhole EA 25 $9,500 $237,500
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 100 $3,000 $300,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 5,000 $200 $1,000,000 13 Railroad crossing improvements LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 14 Install Traffic Signal LS 2 $500,000 $1,000,000
15 Structure LS 1 $500,000 $500,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 944,000 $2.87 $2,709,280
Legend: Subtotal $23,622,780
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $5,905,695
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $29,528,475
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $29,528,475
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $30,473,386
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 7
Rogers Road: Sperry Avenue to SR 33
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $350,000 $350,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 144,000 $4 $576,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 480,000 $20 $9,600,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 54,000 $200 $10,800,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 480,000 $12 $5,760,000
10 Manhole EA 44 $9,500 $418,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 200 $3,000 $600,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 8,800 $200 $1,760,000 13 Railroad crossing improvements LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 14 Install Traffic Signal LS 3 $500,000 $1,500,000
15 Structure LS 1 $3,000,000 $3,000,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 1,608,000 $2.87 $4,614,960
Legend: Subtotal $40,978,960
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $10,244,740
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $51,223,700
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $51,223,700
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $52,862,858
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 8
Zacharias Road: Rogers Road to SR 33
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $220,000 $220,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 60,000 $4 $240,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 300,000 $20 $6,000,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 26,000 $200 $5,200,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 300,000 $12 $3,600,000
10 Manhole EA 30 $9,500 $285,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 120 $3,000 $360,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 6,000 $200 $1,200,000 13 Railroad crossing improvements LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 14 Install Traffic Signal LS 3 $500,000 $1,500,000
15 Structure LS 1 $550,000 $550,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 912,000 $2.87 $2,617,440
Legend: Subtotal $23,772,440
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $5,943,110
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $29,715,550
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $29,715,550
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $30,666,448
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 9
Highway 33: Rogers Road to Walnut Avenue
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $450,000 $450,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 138,000 $4 $552,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 460,000 $20 $9,200,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 52,000 $200 $10,400,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 460,000 $12 $5,520,000
10 Manhole EA 56 $9,500 $532,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 240 $3,000 $720,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 12,000 $200 $2,400,000 13 Railroad crossing improvements LS 3 $2,000,000 $6,000,000 14 Install Traffic Signal LS 3 $500,000 $1,500,000
15 Structure LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 920,000 $2.87 $2,640,400
Legend: Subtotal $41,914,400
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $10,478,600
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $52,393,000
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $52,393,000
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $54,069,576
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 10
Highway 33: Sperry Avenue to Pomelo Avenue
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $140,000 $140,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 44,400 $4 $177,600
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 148,000 $20 $2,960,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 17,000 $200 $3,400,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 148,000 $12 $1,776,000
10 Manhole EA 20 $9,500 $190,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 80 $3,000 $240,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 4,000 $200 $800,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Install Traffic Signal LS 1 $500,000 $500,000
15 Railroad crossing improvements LS 1 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 500,000 $2.87 $1,435,000
Legend: Subtotal $13,618,600
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $3,404,650
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $17,023,250
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $17,023,250
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $17,567,994
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 11
Walnut Avenue: Highway 33 to Sycamore Avenue
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $100,000 $100,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 33,000 $4 $132,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 110,000 $20 $2,200,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 11,000 $200 $2,200,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 110,000 $12 $1,320,000
10 Manhole EA 10 $9,500 $95,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 40 $3,000 $120,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 2,000 $200 $400,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Modify Traffic Signal LS $100,000 $0
15 Structure LS 1 $500,000 $500,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 352,000 $2.87 $1,010,240
Legend: Subtotal $8,077,240
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $2,019,310
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $10,096,550
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $7,572,413
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $7,814,730
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 12
Sycamore Avenue: Eucalyptus Avenue to Orange Avenue
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $140,000 $140,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 66,000 $4 $264,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 220,000 $20 $4,400,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 22,000 $200 $4,400,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 220,000 $12 $2,640,000
10 Manhole EA 20 $9,500 $190,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 80 $3,000 $240,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 4,000 $200 $800,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA $40,000 $0
14 Modify Traffic Signal LS $100,000 $0
15 $0
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 704,000 $2.87 $2,020,480
Legend: Subtotal $15,094,480
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $3,773,620
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $18,868,100
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $14,151,075
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $14,603,909
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City of Patterson
Master Plan Conceptual - Buildout Roadway Improvements Cost Estimates 10/4/2023
Segment # 13
Elm Avenue: Eucalyptus Avenue to Orange Avenue
TIMP Buildout Conceptual Budget Estimate
*Unit Prices Are Based On Caltrans Contract Cost Data
Roadway widening based on an average of total materials and labor Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
1 Traffic Control LS 1 $150,000 $150,000
2 Install Sign EA $400 $0
3 Install Striping LF 66,000 $4 $264,000
4 Install Pavement Marking EA $0
5 Concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk SF 220,000 $20 $4,400,000 6 Concrete curb and gutter LF $0
7 Landscaping LS $0
8 Roadway construction, 12 feet wide lane LF 22,000 $200 $4,400,000 9 Paved shoulder SF 220,000 $12 $2,640,000
10 Manhole EA 20 $9,500 $190,000
11 Storm Drain Inlet EA 80 $3,000 $240,000
12 Storm drain laterals, 12 inch RCP LF 4,000 $200 $800,000 13 Traffic signal mast arm and pole EA 4 $40,000 $160,000 14 Install Traffic Signal LS 1 $300,000 $300,000
15 Structure LS 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
16 Land Acqusition Costs SF 704,000 $2.87 $2,020,480
Legend: Subtotal $16,564,480
LS = Lump Sum Contingency @ 25% $4,141,120
EA = Each Construction Subtotal $20,705,600
LF = Linear Foot
SF = Square Foot
Project Total $15,529,200
2022-2023 CPI increase 3.2% $16,026,134
Note:

County staff input ‐ extra funds for the UPRR coordination & permitting ($1M per intersection).

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Appendix A - Master Plan Roadway Segment Cost - 2024 TIF 020224 (Approve Resolution No. 2023-50 Approving the Regional City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ken Irwin, City Manager
BY: Mike Willett, Public Works Director
MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO: 10.1
SUBJECT: Authorize Mistletoe Abatement; Authorize Staff to Enter into a Small Value Contract with the Contractor Selected to Abate the Mistletoe; and Authorize Staff to Bill the Property Owners. (Resolution No. 2024-07) Clean Up Process.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Authorize Mistletoe Abatement; Authorize Staff to Enter into a Small Value Contract with the Contractor Selected to Abate the Mistletoe; and Authorize Staff to Bill the Property Owners. (Resolution No. 2024-07) Clean Up Process.

BACKGROUND
Mistletoe abatement is an annual process that the city goes through (per Ordinance 174) to help protect the life of our community’s trees. Mistletoe is a parasite that grows on trees that can easily be transferred by birds from one tree to the other. Every year the City crews remove the mistletoe from all city street trees and perform a survey of all properties in the City to spot any Mistletoe on private trees.

ANALYSIS
The item is an abatement of Mistletoe at the attached locations. Staff is requesting authorization from the City Council to abate the Mistletoe at the addresses listed on Exhibit “A” hereto attached. A follow-up survey will be completed on February 20th and a revised list will be provided at the City Council meeting.

After the survey is completed all property owners and tenants are notified by certified mail that the Mistletoe needs to be removed from their trees. Courtesy notices are also hand delivered to

10.1 Packet Pg. 118
each location. Letters to all property owners and tenants were mailed out on January 25, 2024 in which they were given a deadline of February 19, 2024. This letter also informs the residents that the city will abate the Mistletoe at their expense if it is not removed by the specified deadline. Copy of letter attached.

Staff is requesting approval from the City Council for the abatement. Once approved staff will obtain bids from contractors for the removal and proceed with award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder and bill all costs incurred to the property owners.

FISCAL IMPACT
All abatements costs are billed to the property owners if the mistletoe is not removed.

10.1 Packet Pg. 119
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON,

AUTHORIZING THE ABATEMENT OF MISTLETOE
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director of the City of Patterson has reported mistletoe located and existing on properties in the City of Patterson in violation of Ordinance No. 174 of the City of Patterson, a description of said properties being attached hereto on Exhibit “A”; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director of the City of Patterson caused Notice to be mailed to the owner of the subject property as in said Ordinance No. 174, said Notice giving notice to abate said mistletoe and setting a time and place for hearing objections to be proposed abatement; and WHEREAS, said hearing was held on the 20th day of February 2024, as in said Notices provided; and
WHEREAS, no objections to the proposed abatement were received at said hearing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Patterson that said City Council finds that a mistletoe condition exists in said properties located within the City, said properties being in violation of Ordinance No. 174 of the City of Patterson; that a description of said properties being attached hereto on Exhibit “A”.

The foregoing resolution was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 2024, by , who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by , and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct, and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of February 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:

City Clerk of the City of Patterson

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-07 - Approve for Mistletoe Abatement (Clean Up Process) 2-20-24 (Resolution No. 2024-07 Authorize Mistletoe Mistletoe Abatement List Exhibit "A"
# Number Address City, State & Zip APN
1 401 WARD Ave PATTERSON, CA 95363 047-019-007-000
2 329 North 5TH ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-013-059-000
3 527 K ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-022-007-000
4 312 North 3RD ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-013-006-000
5 516 North 3RD ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-012-003-000
6 501 North 4TH ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-012-018-000
7 415 North 4TH ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-012-015-000
8 429 South 3RD ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-006-028-000
9 100 South 6TH ST PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-019-026-000
10 895 MADRONE LN PATTERSON, CA 95363 131-025-020-000
11 1262 SWEET PEA DR PATTERSON, CA 95363 021-084-032-000 12 14831 WARD AVE PATTERSON, CA 95363 047-017-006-000

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Mistletoe Abatement List Exhibit A 2-20-24 (Resolution No. 2024-07 Authorize Mistletoe Abatement & Authorize Small Value

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Michael Willett, MPA, PWLF
Public Works Director
Xavier Guluarte
Deputy Director - Operations & Maintenance
Will Barerra
Deputy Director – Operations & Maintenance
Sonia Delgado, QSP, CESSWI
Deputy Director - Administrative Services & Regulatory Compliance City Hall: 1 Plaza, Patterson, CA 95363 ● Phone: (209) 895-8060 Corporation Yard: 16215 Baldwin Road, Patterson, CA 95363 ● Phone: (209) 895-8160 Water Quality Control Facility: 14901 Poplar Avenue, Patterson, CA 95363 ● Phone: (209) 895-8150 Email Address: www.ci.patterson.ca.us
January 26, 2024
Property Owner/Occupant
Address Here
Patterson, CA 95363
NOTICE
Please notify the owner of the property or property management company.

For properties located at: ADDRESS HERE, PATTERSON, CA 95363 APN: XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX
The city has completed its annual mistletoe abatement process in an effort to keep City trees healthy. The abatement process requires a survey of private trees during the months of December and January. If mistletoe is found, property owners are given time to remove the mistletoe prior to City Council approving abatement the mistletoe and the property is billed for the removal. City ordinance No. 174, states that “every owner of real property within the corporate limits of the City shall keep such real property free and clear of all mistletoe.”
Please be advised that a private tree(s) on this property has been identified as having mistletoe.

Therefore, please have the mistletoe removed by:

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 19, 2024
Failure of the owner of any real property in the City of Patterson, or the occupant thereof, to remove or destroy such mistletoe, will result in removal by other means and expenses incurred will be sent to the owner(s) of the property. On Monday, FEBRUARY 19, 2024 the final survey will be performed and the final list will be submitted to Council on Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 7:00 p.m., and the City Council will consider the abatement of any mistletoe remaining on this property.

Please note, that the city is also in the process of removing the mistletoe from all city-owned trees. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Manny Lopez at (209) 895-8173 or by email at [email protected]. Attached is information on mistletoe and an example of what it looks like.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Sincerely,
`|~x j|ÄÄxàà
Mike Willett
Director of Public Works

10.1.c
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Property Owner-Occupant Letter Sample - 2024 - Mailed January 25 (Resolution No. 2024-07 Authorize Mistletoe Abatement &

MISTLETOE FACT SHEET
What is Mistletoe?
Mistletoe is not just for Christmas time. Mistletoe is a parasite that attaches itself to trees for survival. Mistletoe will live off the nutrients of the tree, without those nutrients, mistletoe would die. Birds spread mistletoe. The birds eat the mistletoe berries, and the seeds are transported and spread through bird droppings.

How to Remove Mistletoe?
The city recommends that a certified Arborist remove the mistletoe. Landscape companies can assist with mistletoe removal. For a list of companies that the city has utilized in the past for this service, please contact Public Works.

Why is this important?
The city is a “Tree City USA,” and its annual abatement process is important to help keep trees healthy and free of mistletoe. This requires a survey of all private trees during the months of November and December. If mistletoe is found, property owners are given time to remove the mistletoe before the City Council abates the mistletoe and the property is billed for the removal. If you have any questions, please contact Manny Lopez at (209) 895-8173 or via email at [email protected]
Mistletoe Picture for your reference.

10.1.d
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: What is Mistletoe Fact Sheet (Resolution No. 2024-07 Authorize Mistletoe Abatement & Authorize Small Value Contract)

Patterson City CouncilFebruary 20, 2024

Patterson City Council
February 20, 2024