Agenda packet, regular meeting — Patterson City Council, November 19, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) City of Patterson – Solid Waste Rate Study 2024 Page | 27 4 BILL IMPACTS
The following table compares the monthly bill impact of the FY 2024/25 rate increases between Scenario 1 and Scenario 2.

Table 10 – Bill Impact Comparison
Scenario 1: No Phase-In Scenario 2: Phase-In
Bill Impact Comparison1
Number of
Customers
Current
Rates
FY 23/24
Proposed
FY 24/25
Rates
Rate
Increase
FY 24/25
Rate
Increase
FY 24/25
Proposed
FY 24/25
Rates
Rate
Increase
FY 24/25
Rate
Increase
FY 24/25
Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month $ per Month % $ per Month $ per Month % (1) 96 gal toter 1 X 112 $41.87 $73.14 $31.27 74.68% $52.15 $10.28 24.55% (2) 96 gal toter 1 X 4 $83.73 $146.28 $62.55 74.70% $104.29 $20.56 24.55% 2 yd bin 1 X 48 $145.46 $146.28 $0.82 0.56% $146.28 $0.82 0.56% 2 yd bin 2 X 11 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59% $292.56 $1.71 0.59% 3 yd bin 1 X 18 $218.18 $219.42 $1.24 0.57% $219.42 $1.24 0.57% 3 yd bin 2 X 15 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59% $438.85 $2.58 0.59% 4 yd bin 1 X 32 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59% $292.56 $1.71 0.59% 4 yd bin 2 X 53 $581.71 $585.13 $3.42 0.59% $585.13 $3.42 0.59% 6 yd bin 1 X 6 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59% $438.85 $2.58 0.59% 6 yd bin 2 X 14 $872.53 $877.69 $5.16 0.59% $877.69 $5.16 0.59% Commercial Recycling Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 6 $20.95 $73.14 $52.19 249.12% $34.72 $13.77 65.71% (2) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 $41.87 $146.28 $104.41 249.37% $69.40 $27.53 65.76% 2 yd bin 1 X 16 $72.74 $146.28 $73.54 101.10% $95.13 $22.39 30.78% 2 yd bin 2 X 2 $145.46 $292.56 $147.10 101.13% $190.24 $44.78 30.79% 3 yd bin 1 X 4 $109.10 $235.88 $126.78 116.21% $142.69 $33.59 30.78% 3 yd bin 2 X 2 $218.18 $471.76 $253.58 116.23% $285.36 $67.18 30.79% 4 yd bin 1 X 14 $145.46 $292.56 $147.10 101.13% $190.24 $44.78 30.79% 4 yd bin 2 X 12 $290.85 $585.13 $294.28 101.18% $380.43 $89.58 30.80% 6 yd bin 1 X 2 $218.18 $438.85 $220.67 101.14% $285.36 $67.18 30.79% Commercial Organics Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 30 $13.94 $73.14 $59.20 424.68% $28.88 $14.94 107.14% 6 yd bin 1 X 1 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59% $438.85 $2.58 0.59% Residential Three Toter Service
Residential Customers 1 X 6,635 $41.83 $43.98 $2.15 5.14% $43.98 $2.15 5.14% Low Income/Senior
Customers 1 X 56 $31.83 $31.83 $0.00 0.00% $31.83 $0.00 0.00% Residential Extra Service
Extra green waste toter 1 X 20 $6.81 $19.43 $12.62 185.32% $10.26 $3.45 50.66% 1 Only services with customers are shown.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) City of Patterson – Solid Waste Rate Study 2024 Page | 28 5 SOLID WASTE RATE SURVEY
The following chart compares the solid waste bill for a typical residential customer with a 96-gallon service to those of other regional agencies.

Figure 3 – Monthly Residential Solid Waste Rate Survey (90/96 Gallon Service) $35.78 $36.07 $36.73 $37.06 $38.41 $41.35 $41.83 $43.02 $43.98 $45.50 $55.46 $56.01
$70.87
$-
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
$70.00
$80.00
Average: $44.84

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) City of Patterson – Solid Waste Rate Study 2024 Page | 29

APPENDIX A - RATE STUDY TABLES

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 1
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Revenues and Expenses
Budget Items1
Inflation FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29-30 Estimated Budgeted Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Account Number Non-Rate Revenues
600-000-5030 Franchise Fees 0.0% $32,417 $44,530 $44,530 $44,530 $44,530 $44,530 $44,530 600-000-5235 Highway Maintenance (SWEEP) 0.0% 3,960 4,320 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 11,500 600-000-5700 Late Fee 0.0% 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Total Non-Rate Revenues $36,377 $168,850 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 Account Number City Expenses
600-200-6001 Salaries & Wages, Full-Time 5.0% 0 214,583 225,312 236,578 248,407 260,827 273,868 600-200-6011 Leave Payout 3.0% 0 3,286 3,384 3,486 3,591 3,698 3,809 600-200-6100 FICA/Medicare - Employer 5.0% 0 3,159 3,317 3,483 3,657 3,840 4,032 600-200-6105 Retirement 5.0% 0 29,705 31,191 32,750 34,388 36,107 37,912 600-200-6110 Worker's Compensation 5.0% 0 6,830 7,172 7,530 7,907 8,302 8,717 600-200-6120 Medical Insurance 5.0% 0 61,112 64,168 67,376 70,745 74,282 77,996 600-200-6123 Post Retirement Medical Insur. 5.0% 0 2,251 2,364 2,482 2,606 2,736 2,873 600-200-6125 Dental Insurance 5.0% 0 6,428 6,749 7,087 7,441 7,813 8,204 600-200-6130 Vision Insurance 5.0% 0 804 844 886 931 977 1,026 600-200-6135 Life Insurance 5.0% 0 953 1,001 1,051 1,103 1,158 1,216 600-790-6001 Salaries & Wages, Full-Time 5.0% 879,279 775,834 814,625 855,357 898,124 943,031 990,182 600-790-6002 Salaries & Wages, Part-Time 5.0% 9,357 26,000 27,300 28,665 30,098 31,603 33,183 600-790-6005 Overtime 5.0% 4,684 6,200 6,510 6,836 7,177 7,536 7,913 600-790-6011 Leave Payout 5.0% 14,706 11,699 12,284 12,898 13,543 14,220 14,931 600-790-6100 FICA/Medicare - Employer 5.0% 12,047 13,953 14,650 15,383 16,152 16,959 17,807 600-790-6105 Retirement 5.0% 127,528 101,680 106,764 112,103 117,708 123,593 129,773 600-790-6106 HRA 5.0% 13,857 15,575 16,354 17,172 18,030 18,932 19,878 600-790-6110 Worker's Compensation 5.0% 14,761 55,142 57,899 60,794 63,834 67,025 70,377 600-790-6115 Unemployment Insurance 5.0% 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 600-790-6120 Medical Insurance 5.0% 165,877 115,612 121,392 127,462 133,835 140,527 147,553 600-790-6123 Post Retirment - Medical Ins 5.0% 1,968 8,316 8,732 9,168 9,627 10,108 10,614 600-790-6125 Dental Insurance 5.0% 19,278 23,745 24,932 26,178 27,487 28,862 30,305 600-790-6130 Vision Insurance 5.0% 2,851 2,970 3,119 3,274 3,438 3,610 3,791 600-790-6135 Life Insurance 5.0% 4,606 7,933 8,329 8,746 9,183 9,642 10,124 600-790-6145 Tuition Reimbursement 0.0% 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 600-790-6155 Def Compensation Match 5.0% 4,972 1,720 1,806 1,896 1,991 2,090 2,195 600-790-6200 Fiscal Service 5.0% 5,286 8,251 8,664 9,097 9,552 10,029 10,531 600-790-6221 Consulting Services2,3 0.0% 22,951 50,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 5,000 600-790-6222 IT Services43.0% 11,320 20,000 20,600 21,218 21,855 22,510 23,185 600-790-6241 Contract Service - St Sweeping55.0% 192,585 242,657 254,790 652,050 684,653 718,885 754,829 600-790-6242 Contract Services (NEW - SW Program Costs) 6,7 5.0% 0 15,000 5,000 5,250 5,513 5,788 6,078 600-790-6244 SW Community Recycling Day85.0% 0 20,000 21,000 22,050 23,153 24,310 25,526 600-790-6250 Insurance 5.0% 321,465 423,848 445,040 467,292 490,657 515,190 540,949 600-790-6300 Equipment Maintenance 5.0% 138 400 420 441 463 486 511 600-790-6310 Facility Maintenance 3.0% 4,030 5,000 5,150 5,305 5,464 5,628 5,796 600-790-6315 Vehicle Maintenance 5.0% 3,660 8,000 8,400 8,820 9,261 9,724 10,210 600-790-6400 Office Supplies 3.0% 5,845 6,000 6,180 6,365 6,556 6,753 6,956 600-790-6405 Postage 3.0% 14,412 12,000 12,360 12,731 13,113 13,506 13,911 600-790-6410 Departmental Supplies 3.0% 1,198 5,500 5,665 5,835 6,010 6,190 6,376 600-790-6415 Small Tools/Shop Supplies 3.0% 1,909 2,667 2,747 2,829 2,914 3,002 3,092 600-790-6425 Fuel 5.0% 6,854 5,000 5,250 5,513 5,788 6,078 6,381 600-790-6435 Safety Supplies 5.0% 135 1,350 1,418 1,488 1,563 1,641 1,723 600-790-6440 Uniforms 5.0% 6,837 10,000 10,500 11,025 11,576 12,155 12,763 600-790-6500 Rents & Leases, Equipment 3.0% 3,199 11,450 11,794 12,147 12,512 12,887 13,274 600-790-6605 Advertising 3.0% 5,165 6,100 6,283 6,471 6,666 6,866 7,072 600-790-6610 Training 3.0% 3,041 3,500 3,605 3,713 3,825 3,939 4,057 600-790-6620 Due & Publications 5.0% 396 2,000 2,100 2,205 2,315 2,431 2,553 600-790-6625 Medical Services 5.0% 291 500 525 551 579 608 638 600-000-6680 Grant Expenditure 5.0% 9,889 0 0 0 0 0 0
600-790-6700 Telephone 5.0% 7,565 7,500 7,875 8,269 8,682 9,116 9,572 600-790-6760 Permits & Fees 5.0% 0 200 210 221 232 243 255

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Revenues and Expenses
Budget Items1
Inflation FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29-30 Estimated Budgeted Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 600-790-7501 Computer Equipment 0.0% 3,276 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 600-790-7504 Vehicles90.0% 129,564 0 0 0 0 300,500 0
600-790-7550 Improvements Expense10 0.0% 0 0 80,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600-790-7560 Machinery & Equipment Expense11 0.0% 62,256 32,500 42,230 5,000 50,000 0 25,000 600-790-7573 Recycling Program 0.0% 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 600-999-9000 To General Fund 5.0% 689,206 235,000 246,750 259,088 272,042 285,644 299,926 600-999-9012 To Street 327 Fund12 0.0% 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600-999-9013 To Sewer Fund13 0.0% 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 New Personnel14 0.0% $0 $0 $0 $47,010 $135,379 $142,148 $202,867 __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ __________ Total City Expenses $2,916,307 $2,668,912 $2,928,752 $3,574,624 $3,865,321 $4,312,737 $4,246,311 1 Based on City financial forecast provided 8/15/24.
2 Consultant Services, Year 1 24/25, $5,000 general, $20,000 SW Rate Study, $25k electrical infrastructure Master Plan. 3 Consultant Services, Year 5 28/29, $5,000 general, $25,000 SW Rate Study. 4 IT Services - $10,000 increase for Mobile MMS, renewed contract increase, additional computer needs. 5 Street Sweeping - City performing Street Sweeping services due to prevailing wage requirements. Vehicles and personnel are included in this amount. 6 Contract Services - New Account for Solid Waste Program, hazadous waste disposal. Includes $10,000 annually. 7 Contract Services - New Account for Parks (Annually) $10,000 for compost procurement/equipmet, SB1383 regulation. 50% Garbage/50% LMD. 8 SW Community Recycling Day - Two times per year Community Recycling Day Event, etc. 9 Vehicles - Listed in Table 16. Please note, those vehicles for street sweeping are included in the cost for street sweeping, account 600-790-6241. 10 Improvements Expense - $80,000 for 25/26 SP Green Waste Processing Area improvements and new and old corporation yard. 11 Machinery & Equipment Expense - Listed in Table 16 and includes one time cost of Equipment, Vehicles, Tools, Incidentals from Table 16. 12 To Street Fund - Includes Streets (Annually) $100,000 for Street/Alley Repairs due to garbage trucks damaging asphalt. 13 To Sewer Fund - Include $100,000 reimbursement from Garbage to Sewer for Bark/Compost Blower purchase annually for 5 years ($500,000 total). 14 New Personnel - Recoccuring costs for personnel are provided at a 5% inflation rate. Please note, those personnel for street sweeping are included in the cost for street sweeping and the account total, account 600-790-6241.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 2
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2023/24 Equivalent Service Units (ESUs)
Equivalent Service Units (ESUs)
Commercial Trash Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs 1 Customers 2 Total ESUs
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 112 112.00
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 2 4 8.00
2 yd bin 1 X 2 48 96.00
2 yd bin 2 X 4 11 44.00
2 yd bin 3 X 6
2 yd bin 4 X 8
3 yd bin 1 X 3 18 54.00
3 yd bin 2 X 6 15 90.00
3 yd bin 3 X 9
3 yd bin 4 X 12
4 yd bin 1 X 4 32 128.00
4 yd bin 2 X 8 53 424.00
4 yd bin 3 X 12
4 yd bin 4 X 16
6 yd bin 1 X 6 6 36.00
6 yd bin 2 X 12 14 168.00
6 yd bin 3 X 18
6 yd bin 4 X 24
Total Commercial Trash Service 313 1,160.00
Commercial Recycling Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs Customers Total ESUs
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 6 6.00
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 2 1 2.00
2 yd bin 1 X 2 16 32.00
2 yd bin 2 X 4 2 8.00
2 yd bin 3 X 6
2 yd bin 4 X 8
3 yd bin 1 X 3 4 12.00
3 yd bin 2 X 6 2 12.00
3 yd bin 3 X 9
3 yd bin 4 X 12
4 yd bin 1 X 4 14 56.00
4 yd bin 2 X 8 12 96.00
4 yd bin 3 X 12
4 yd bin 4 X 16
6 yd bin 1 X 6 2 12.00
6 yd bin 2 X 12 2 24.00
6 yd bin 3 X 18
6 yd bin 4 X 24
Total Commercial Recycling Service 61 260.00

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 2
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2023/24 Equivalent Service Units (ESUs)
Equivalent Service Units (ESUs)
Commercial Organics Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs Customers Total ESUs
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 30 30.00
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 2
2 yd bin 1 X 2
2 yd bin 2 X 4
2 yd bin 3 X 6
2 yd bin 4 X 8
3 yd bin 1 X 3
3 yd bin 2 X 6
3 yd bin 3 X 9
3 yd bin 4 X 12
4 yd bin 1 X 4
4 yd bin 2 X 8
4 yd bin 3 X 12
4 yd bin 4 X 16
6 yd bin 1 X 6 1 6.00
6 yd bin 2 X 12
6 yd bin 3 X 18
6 yd bin 4 X 24
Total Commercial Organics Service 31 36.00
Total Commercial Equivalent Service Units 405 1,456.00
Residential Equivalent Service Units (ESUs)
Residential Three Toter Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs Customers Total ESUs
Residential Customers 1 X 0.60 6,635 3,989.46
Low Income/Senior Customers 1 X 0.60 56 33.67
Total Residential Three Toter Service 6,691 4,023.13
Residential Extra Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs Customers Total ESUs
Extra trash toter 1 X 0.27 0 0.00
Extra recycle toter 1 X 0.27 0 0.00
Extra green waste toter 1 X 0.27 20 5.31
Total Residential Extra Service 20 5.31
Total Residential Equivalent Service Units 6,711 4,028.45 Total 7,116 5,484.45
1 Equivalent Service Units (ESUs) are based on the Bertolotti charges relative to a single toter service once per week service.
2 Customer count based on City billing data as of 8/5/2024.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 3
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Customer Growth Projections
Commercial Equivalent Service Units (ESUs) FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29-30 Projected Annual Growth Rate 0.5% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% Projected Commercial Growth
Commercial Trash Service ESUs 1,160.00 1,165.80 1,177.46 1,189.23 1,201.12 1,213.14 1,225.27 Commercial Recycling Service ESUs 260.00 261.30 263.91 266.55 269.22 271.91 274.63 Commercial Organics Service ESUs 36.00 36.18 36.54 36.91 37.28 37.65 38.03 Total Projected Commercial ESUs 1,456.00 1,463.28 1,477.91 1,492.69 1,507.62 1,522.70 1,537.92 Projected Residential Growth
Projected New Residential Customers (growth override) 105 210 210 210 210 210 Total Residential Three Toter Service Customers 6,691 6,796 7,006 7,216 7,426 7,636 7,846 Residential Three Toter Service ESUs1
4,023.13 4,086.27 4,212.54 4,338.80 4,465.07 4,591.34 4,717.61 Residential Extra Service ESUs1

5.31 5.34 5.39 5.45 5.50 5.56 5.61
Total Projected Residential ESUs 4,028.45 4,091.61 4,217.93 4,344.25 4,470.57 4,596.90 4,723.22 Total Projected ESUs 5,484.45 5,554.89 5,695.84 5,836.94 5,978.19 6,119.59 6,261.14 Total Projected Growth 1.3% 2.5% 2.5% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3%
1 Residential Three Toter Service customer is equivalent to 0.60 ESUs. Residential Extra Service customer is equivalent to 0.27 ESUs.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 4
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 Revenue
Service Description
Collection
Frequency Current Rate1
FY 23/24
Customers
FY 23/24 Annual
Revenue
Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
Size Weekly Frequency $ per Month # $ per Year
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 112 $56,273
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X $83.73 4 $4,019
2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 48 $83,785
2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 11 $38,392
2 yd bin 3 X
2 yd bin 4 X
3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 18 $47,127
3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 15 $78,529
3 yd bin 3 X
3 yd bin 4 X
4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 32 $111,686
4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 53 $369,968
4 yd bin 3 X
4 yd bin 4 X
6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 6 $31,411
6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 14 $146,585
6 yd bin 3 X
6 yd bin 4 X
Total Commercial Trash Service 313 $967,775

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 4
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 Revenue
Service Description
Collection
Frequency Current Rate1
FY 23/24
Customers
FY 23/24 Annual
Revenue
Commercial Recycling Service
Size Weekly Frequency $ per Month # $ per Year
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X $20.95 6 $1,508
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 1 $502
2 yd bin 1 X $72.74 16 $13,966
2 yd bin 2 X $145.46 2 $3,491
2 yd bin 3 X
2 yd bin 4 X
3 yd bin 1 X $109.10 4 $5,237
3 yd bin 2 X $218.18 2 $5,236
3 yd bin 3 X
3 yd bin 4 X
4 yd bin 1 X $145.46 14 $24,437
4 yd bin 2 X $290.85 12 $41,882
4 yd bin 3 X
4 yd bin 4 X
6 yd bin 1 X $218.18 2 $5,236
6 yd bin 2 X $436.27 2 $10,470
6 yd bin 3 X
6 yd bin 4 X
Total Commercial Recycling Service 61 $111,968

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 4
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 Revenue
Service Description
Collection
Frequency Current Rate1
FY 23/24
Customers
FY 23/24 Annual
Revenue
Commercial Organics Service
Size Weekly Frequency $ per Month # $ per Year
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X $13.94 30 $5,018
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X
2 yd bin 1 X $145.46
2 yd bin 2 X $290.85
2 yd bin 3 X
2 yd bin 4 X
3 yd bin 1 X $218.18
3 yd bin 2 X $436.27
3 yd bin 3 X
3 yd bin 4 X
4 yd bin 1 X $290.85
4 yd bin 2 X $581.71
4 yd bin 3 X
4 yd bin 4 X
6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 1 $5,235
6 yd bin 2 X $872.53
6 yd bin 3 X
6 yd bin 4 X
Total Commercial Organics Service 31 $10,254
Residential Three Toter Service
Size Weekly Frequency $ per Month # $ per Year
Residential Customers 1 X $41.83 6,635 $3,330,505
Low Income/Senior Customers 1 X $31.83 56 $21,390
Total Residential Three Toter Service 6,691 $3,351,894
Residential Extra Service
Size Weekly Frequency $ per Month # $ per Year
Extra trash toter 1 X
Extra recycle toter 1 X
Extra green waste toter 1 X $6.81 20 $1,634
Total Residential Extra Service 20 $1,634
Total 7,116 $4,443,525
1 Current FY 23/24 rates based on City billing data as of 1/3/2024.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 5
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 Bertolotti Cost
Summary of Requested Change
in Bertolotti Fees
FY 23/24
Customers
Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
1 Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
Bertolotti Proposed
Fees (before
contract escalation)
for FY 24/25
2 Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Year $ per Month
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 112 $32.93 $44,258 $32.93
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 4 $65.86 $3,161 $65.86
2 yd bin 1 X 48 $65.86 $37,935 $65.86
2 yd bin 2 X 11 $131.72 $17,387 $131.72
2 yd bin 3 X n/a $197.58
2 yd bin 4 X n/a $263.44
3 yd bin 1 X 18 $98.79 $21,339 $98.79
3 yd bin 2 X 15 $197.58 $35,564 $197.58
3 yd bin 3 X n/a $296.37
3 yd bin 4 X n/a $395.16
4 yd bin 1 X 32 $131.72 $50,580 $131.72
4 yd bin 2 X 53 $263.44 $167,548 $263.44
4 yd bin 3 X n/a $395.16
4 yd bin 4 X n/a $526.88
6 yd bin 1 X 6 $197.58 $14,226 $197.58
6 yd bin 2 X 14 $395.16 $66,387 $395.16
6 yd bin 3 X n/a $592.74
6 yd bin 4 X n/a $790.32

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 5
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 Bertolotti Cost
Summary of Requested Change
in Bertolotti Fees
FY 23/24
Customers
Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
1 Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
Bertolotti Proposed
Fees (before
contract escalation)
for FY 24/25
2 Commercial Recycling Service
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 6 $16.47 $1,186 $32.93
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 $32.93 $395 $65.86
2 yd bin 1 X 16 $32.93 $6,323 $65.86
2 yd bin 2 X 2 $65.86 $1,581 $131.72
2 yd bin 3 X n/a $197.58
2 yd bin 4 X n/a $263.44
3 yd bin 1 X 4 $49.40 $2,371 $98.79
3 yd bin 2 X 2 $98.79 $2,371 $197.58
3 yd bin 3 X n/a $296.37
3 yd bin 4 X n/a $395.16
4 yd bin 1 X 14 $65.86 $11,064 $131.72
4 yd bin 2 X 12 $131.72 $18,968 $263.44
4 yd bin 3 X n/a $395.16
4 yd bin 4 X n/a $526.88
6 yd bin 1 X 2 $98.79 $2,371 $197.58
6 yd bin 2 X 2 $197.58 $4,742 $395.16
6 yd bin 3 X n/a $592.74
6 yd bin 4 X n/a $790.32

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 5
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 Bertolotti Cost
Summary of Requested Change
in Bertolotti Fees
FY 23/24
Customers
Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
1 Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
Bertolotti Proposed
Fees (before
contract escalation)
for FY 24/25
2 Commercial Organics Service
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 30 $32.93 $11,855 $32.93
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X n/a $65.86
2 yd bin 1 X $65.86 $65.86
2 yd bin 2 X $131.72 $131.72
2 yd bin 3 X n/a $197.58
2 yd bin 4 X n/a $263.44
3 yd bin 1 X $98.79 $98.79
3 yd bin 2 X $197.58 $197.58
3 yd bin 3 X n/a $296.37
3 yd bin 4 X n/a $395.16
4 yd bin 1 X $131.72 $131.72
4 yd bin 2 X $263.44 $263.44
4 yd bin 3 X n/a $395.16
4 yd bin 4 X n/a $526.88
6 yd bin 1 X 1 $197.58 $2,371 $197.58
6 yd bin 2 X $395.16 $395.16
6 yd bin 3 X n/a $592.74
6 yd bin 4 X n/a $790.32

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 5
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Projected FY 23/24 and FY 24/25 Bertolotti Cost
Summary of Requested Change
in Bertolotti Fees
FY 23/24
Customers
Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
1 Bertolotti
FY 23/24
Current Fees
Bertolotti Proposed
Fees (before
contract escalation)
for FY 24/25
2 Residential Three Toter Service
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month
Residential Customers 1 X 6,635 $18.94 $1,508,003 $19.80 Low Income/Senior Customers 1 X 56 $18.94 $12,728 $19.80 Residential Extra Service
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month
Extra trash toter 1 X n/a $8.75
Extra recycle toter 1 X n/a $8.75
Extra green waste toter 1 X 20 $5.00 $1,200 $8.75
Total Bertolotti Cost 7,116 $2,045,913 1
Current FY 23/24 rates based on City billing data as of 1/3/2024. 2 Based on requested rate sheet provided by Bertolotti 1/4/2024.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 6
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Bertolotti Cost Projections
Bertolotti Cost Projections Increase Weight FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Actual Contractual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Waste to Energy Rate Projected Utilization $43.00 $50.90 $53.45 $56.12 $58.92 $61.87 Weighted Rate 62% $26.66 $31.56 $33.14 $34.79 $36.53 $38.36 Fink Road Landfill Rate $29.00 $45.00 $47.25 $49.61 $52.09 $54.70 Weighted Rate 38% $11.02 $17.10 $17.96 $18.85 $19.80 $20.79 Average Weighted Tipping Price $37.68 $48.66 $51.09 $53.65 $56.33 $59.14 Projected Tipping Rate Increase1

1.67% 29.13% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Tipping Component of Increase 20% 0.33% 5.83% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% 1.00% Collection Increase (CPI)2

3.20% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
Collection Component of Increase 80% 2.56% 3.20% 3.20% 3.20% 3.20% 3.20% Total Projected Cost Increase3
n/a New Base 2.89% 9.03% 4.20% 4.20% 4.20% 4.20%
Bertolotti Monthly Fee per ESU $32.93 $33.88 $36.94 $38.49 $40.11 $41.79 $43.55 Total Projected ESUs 5,484.45 5,484 5,555 5,696 5,837 5,978 6,120 Existing Contract Charge $2,045,913 $2,105,122
Proposed Contract Charge $2,167,235 $2,229,954 $2,462,478 $2,631,011 $2,809,428 $2,998,265 $3,198,087 Projected Bertolotti Charges4
$2,045,913 $2,167,235 $2,167,538 $2,462,478 $2,631,011 $2,809,428 $2,998,265 $3,198,087 1 Tipping fee agreement with County expires in FY 24/25. Future years of projected tipping rate increase are an estimate. 2 Collection fee increase based on current and projected Consumer Price Index (CPI) changes. 3 Total projected cost increase based on a 20% tipping component and an 80% collection component of each respective increase. 4 FY 24/25 assumes a half-year existing contract and a half-year proposed contract.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 7
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Cashflow Projections
Scenario 1: No Phase-In
Cashflow FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Beginning Reserve Balance $2,022,601 $1,584,836 $1,619,455 $1,790,091 $1,692,880 $1,720,542 $1,764,041 Revenues
Current Rate Revenue $4,443,525 $4,500,597 $4,999,202 $5,507,274 $6,063,587 $6,672,531 $7,338,886 Revenue Increase % 8.3% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 6.0%
Rate Revenue from Increase $374,891 $374,940 $413,046 $454,769 $500,440 $440,333 Timing Adjustment1
-$187,446
Other Revenue $36,377 $168,850 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 Discount Program -$9,623 -$12,607 -$14,826 -$17,375 -$20,300 -$22,831 Interest $44,552 $23,800 $24,300 $26,900 $25,400 $25,800 $26,500 Total Revenue $4,524,455 $4,871,069 $5,561,865 $6,108,424 $6,702,411 $7,354,501 $7,958,918 Expenses
Bertolotti O&M Cost $2,045,913 $2,167,538 $2,462,478 $2,631,011 $2,809,428 $2,998,265 $3,198,087 All Other O&M $2,724,486 $2,636,412 $2,886,522 $3,469,624 $3,715,321 $3,912,237 $4,121,311 Equipment Purchase $191,821 $32,500 $42,230 $105,000 $150,000 $400,500 $125,000 Total Expenses $4,962,220 $4,836,450 $5,391,230 $6,205,635 $6,674,748 $7,311,002 $7,444,398 Net Revenues -$437,765 $34,620 $170,635 -$97,211 $27,662 $43,499 $514,520 Ending Reserve Balance $1,584,836 $1,619,455 $1,790,091 $1,692,880 $1,720,542 $1,764,041 $2,278,561 Reserve Targets (3 Months
Operating Cost) $1,193,000 $1,201,000 $1,337,000 $1,525,000 $1,631,000 $1,728,000 $1,830,000 Target Met? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
1 Timing adjustment reflects a rate implementation on January 1, 2025.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate $0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 Bertolotti Expenses
Equipment and Transfers
O&M Expenses
Revenue
Reserves
Reserve Target
City of Patterson
Solid Waste Cashflow ($ millions)
Scenario 1: No Phase-In

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 8
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 24/25 Unit Rate Derivation
Unit Rate Derivation FY 24/25
Rate Revenue Requirement $4,875,488.01
FY 24/25 ESUs 5,554.89
Annual Rate per ESU $877.69
Monthly Rate Per ESU $73.14

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 9
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2024/25 Rate Derivation
FY 2024/25 Rate Derivation Total FY 24/25 Rate
Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs $ per Month
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 $73.14
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 2 $146.28
2 yd bin 1 X2 $146.28
2 yd bin 2 X4 $292.56
2 yd bin 3 X6 $438.85
2 yd bin 4 X8 $585.13
3 yd bin 1 X3 $219.42
3 yd bin 2 X6 $438.85
3 yd bin 3 X9 $658.27
3 yd bin 4 X 12 $877.69
4 yd bin 1 X4 $292.56
4 yd bin 2 X8 $585.13
4 yd bin 3 X 12 $877.69
4 yd bin 4 X 16 $1,170.26
6 yd bin 1 X6 $438.85
6 yd bin 2 X 12 $877.69
6 yd bin 3 X 18 $1,316.54
6 yd bin 4 X 24 $1,755.39
Commercial Recycling Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs $ per Month
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 $73.14
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 2 $146.28
2 yd bin 1 X2 $146.28
2 yd bin 2 X4 $292.56
2 yd bin 3 X6 $438.85
2 yd bin 4 X8 $585.13
3 yd bin 1 X3 $219.42
3 yd bin 2 X6 $438.85
3 yd bin 3 X9 $658.27
3 yd bin 4 X 12 $877.69
4 yd bin 1 X4 $292.56
4 yd bin 2 X8 $585.13
4 yd bin 3 X 12 $877.69
4 yd bin 4 X 16 $1,170.26
6 yd bin 1 X6 $438.85
6 yd bin 2 X 12 $877.69
6 yd bin 3 X 18 $1,316.54
6 yd bin 4 X 24 $1,755.39

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 9
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2024/25 Rate Derivation
FY 2024/25 Rate Derivation Total FY 24/25 Rate
Commercial Organics Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs $ per Month
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X1 $73.14
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X2 $146.28
2 yd bin 1 X2 $146.28
2 yd bin 2 X4 $292.56
2 yd bin 3 X6 $438.85
2 yd bin 4 X8 $585.13
3 yd bin 1 X3 $219.42
3 yd bin 2 X6 $438.85
3 yd bin 3 X9 $658.27
3 yd bin 4 X 12 $877.69
4 yd bin 1 X4 $292.56
4 yd bin 2 X8 $585.13
4 yd bin 3 X 12 $877.69
4 yd bin 4 X 16 $1,170.26
6 yd bin 1 X6 $438.85
6 yd bin 2 X 12 $877.69
6 yd bin 3 X 18 $1,316.54
6 yd bin 4 X 24 $1,755.39
Residential Three Toter Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs $ per Month
Residential 1 X 0.60 $43.98
Low Income/Senior 1 X 0.60 $43.98
Residential Extra Service
Size Weekly Frequency ESUs $ per Month
Extra trash toter 1 X 0.27 $19.43
Extra recycle toter 1 X 0.27 $19.43
Extra green waste toter 1 X 0.27 $19.43

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 10
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Recommended Rates
Scenario 1: No Phase-In
Rates Effective
Recommended Rates Current 1/1/2025 7/1/2025 7/1/2026 7/1/2027 7/1/2028 7/1/2029 Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service)
Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 $73.14 $78.63 $84.53 $90.87 $97.69 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $83.73 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92 Commercial Recycling Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $20.95 $73.14 $78.63 $84.53 $90.87 $97.69 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $72.74 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $145.46 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $109.10 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $218.18 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 10
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Recommended Rates
Scenario 1: No Phase-In
Rates Effective
Recommended Rates Current 1/1/2025 7/1/2025 7/1/2026 7/1/2027 7/1/2028 7/1/2029 Commercial Organics Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $13.94 $73.14 $78.63 $84.53 $90.87 $97.69 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92 Residential Three Toter Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Residential Customers 1 X $41.83 $43.98 $47.28 $50.83 $54.64 $58.74 $62.26 % Increase 5.14% 7.50% 7.51% 7.50% 7.50% 5.99%
$ Increase $2.15 $3.30 $3.55 $3.81 $4.10 $3.52
Low Income/Senior
Customers 1 X $31.83 $31.83 $31.83 $33.18 $34.53 $35.88 $37.23 % Increase 0.00% 0.00% 4.24% 4.07% 3.91% 3.76%
$ Increase $0.00 $0.00 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35
Residential Extra Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service)
Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Extra trash toter 1 X $6.81 $19.43 $20.89 $22.46 $24.14 $25.95 $27.51 Extra recycle toter 1 X $6.81 $19.43 $20.89 $22.46 $24.14 $25.95 $27.51 Extra green waste toter 1 X $6.81 $19.43 $20.89 $22.46 $24.14 $25.95 $27.51

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 11
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2024/25 Bill Impacts
Scenario 1: No Phase-In
Bill Impacts
1 Number of
Customers
Current Rates
FY 2023/24
Proposed Rates
FY 2024/25
Rate Increase
FY 2024/25
Rate Increase
FY 2024/25
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month $ per Month % Increase
Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 112 $41.87 $73.14 $31.27 74.68%
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X4 $83.73 $146.28 $62.55 74.70%
2 yd bin 1 X 48 $145.46 $146.28 $0.82 0.56%
2 yd bin 2 X 11 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59%
3 yd bin 1 X 18 $218.18 $219.42 $1.24 0.57%
3 yd bin 2 X 15 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59%
4 yd bin 1 X 32 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59%
4 yd bin 2 X 53 $581.71 $585.13 $3.42 0.59%
6 yd bin 1 X6 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59%
6 yd bin 2 X 14 $872.53 $877.69 $5.16 0.59%
Commercial Recycling Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X6 $20.95 $73.14 $52.19 249.12%
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X1 $41.87 $146.28 $104.41 249.37%
2 yd bin 1 X 16 $72.74 $146.28 $73.54 101.10%
2 yd bin 2 X2 $145.46 $292.56 $147.10 101.13%
3 yd bin 1 X4 $109.10 $235.88 $126.78 116.21%
3 yd bin 2 X2 $218.18 $471.76 $253.58 116.23%
4 yd bin 1 X 14 $145.46 $292.56 $147.10 101.13%
4 yd bin 2 X 12 $290.85 $585.13 $294.28 101.18%
6 yd bin 1 X2 $218.18 $438.85 $220.67 101.14%
Commercial Organics Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 30 $13.94 $73.14 $59.20 424.68%
6 yd bin 1 X1 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59%
Residential Three Toter Service
Residential Customers 1 X 6,635 $41.83 $43.98 $2.15 5.14% Low Income/Senior Customers 1 X 56 $31.83 $31.83 $0.00 0.00% Residential Extra Service
Extra green waste toter 1 X 20 $6.81 $19.43 $12.62 185.32% 1 Only services with customers are shown.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 12
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Cashflow Projections
Scenario 2: Phase-In
Cashflow FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Beginning Reserve Balance $2,022,601 $1,584,836 $1,492,726 $1,562,777 $1,389,526 $1,364,132 $1,375,701 Revenues
Current Rate Revenue $4,443,525 $4,500,597 $4,999,203 $5,507,274 $6,063,587 $6,672,531 $7,338,887 Revenue Increase % 8.3% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 6.0%
Rate Revenue from Increase $374,891 $374,940 $413,046 $454,769 $500,440 $440,333 Timing Adjustment1
-$187,446
Phase-In Adjustment -$126,729 -$98,685 -$72,540 -$48,457 -$26,630 Other Revenue $36,377 $168,850 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 $176,030 Discount Program -$9,623 -$12,607 -$14,826 -$17,375 -$20,300 -$22,831 Interest $44,552 $23,800 $22,400 $23,400 $20,800 $20,500 $20,600 Total Revenue $4,524,455 $4,744,340 $5,461,281 $6,032,384 $6,649,354 $7,322,571 $7,953,019 Expenses
Bertolotti O&M Cost $2,045,913 $2,167,538 $2,462,478 $2,631,011 $2,809,428 $2,998,265 $3,198,087 All Other O&M $2,724,486 $2,636,412 $2,886,522 $3,469,624 $3,715,321 $3,912,237 $4,121,311 Equipment Purchase $191,821 $32,500 $42,230 $105,000 $150,000 $400,500 $125,000 Total Expenses $4,962,220 $4,836,450 $5,391,230 $6,205,635 $6,674,748 $7,311,002 $7,444,398 Net Revenues -$437,765 -$92,109 $70,051 -$173,251 -$25,395 $11,570 $508,621 Ending Reserve Balance $1,584,836 $1,492,726 $1,562,777 $1,389,526 $1,364,132 $1,375,701 $1,884,322 Reserve Targets (3 Months
Operating Cost) $1,193,000 $1,201,000 $1,337,000 $1,525,000 $1,631,000 $1,728,000 $1,830,000 Target Met? Yes Yes Yes No No No Yes
1 Timing adjustment reflects a rate implementation on January 1, 2025.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate $0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 Bertolotti Expenses
Equipment and Transfers
O&M Expenses
Revenue
Reserves
Reserve Target
City of Patterson
Solid Waste Cashflow ($ millions)
Scenario 2: Phase-In

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 13
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Scenario 2: Phase-In
Rates Effective
Recommended Rates Current 1/1/2025 7/1/2025 7/1/2026 7/1/2027 7/1/2028 7/1/2029 Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service)
Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 $52.15 $62.43 $72.71 $82.99 $93.27 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $83.73 $104.29 $124.84 $145.40 $165.96 $186.51 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92 Commercial Recycling Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $20.95 $34.72 $48.48 $62.25 $76.02 $89.78 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 $69.40 $96.94 $124.47 $152.00 $179.54 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $72.74 $95.13 $117.52 $139.91 $162.29 $184.68 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $145.46 $190.24 $235.02 $279.81 $324.59 $369.37 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $285.39 $352.55 $419.72 $486.88 $554.05 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $380.51 $470.07 $559.62 $649.17 $738.73 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $109.10 $142.69 $176.27 $209.86 $243.44 $277.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $218.18 $285.36 $352.53 $419.71 $486.88 $554.06 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $428.06 $528.81 $629.57 $730.32 $831.08 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $570.74 $705.08 $839.42 $973.76 $1,108.10 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $190.24 $235.02 $279.81 $324.59 $369.37 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $380.43 $470.00 $559.58 $649.16 $738.73 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $570.73 $705.07 $839.42 $973.76 $1,108.11 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $760.97 $940.09 $1,119.22 $1,298.35 $1,477.47 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $285.36 $352.53 $419.71 $486.88 $554.06 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $570.64 $705.00 $839.37 $973.73 $1,108.10 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $856.07 $1,057.59 $1,259.12 $1,460.64 $1,662.17 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,141.42 $1,410.12 $1,678.82 $1,947.52 $2,216.22 $2,484.92

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 13
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
Scenario 2: Phase-In
Rates Effective
Recommended Rates Current 1/1/2025 7/1/2025 7/1/2026 7/1/2027 7/1/2028 7/1/2029 Commercial Organics Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $13.94 $28.88 $43.81 $58.75 $73.68 $88.62 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92 Residential Rate Derivation
Residential Three Toter Service
Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Residential Customers 1 X $41.83 $43.98 $47.28 $50.83 $54.64 $58.74 $62.26 % Increase 5.14% 7.50% 7.51% 7.50% 7.50% 5.99%
$ Increase $2.15 $3.30 $3.55 $3.81 $4.10 $3.52
Low Income/Senior
Customers 1 X $31.83 $31.83 $31.83 $33.18 $34.53 $35.88 $37.23 % Increase 0.00% 0.00% 4.24% 4.07% 3.91% 3.76%
$ Increase $0.00 $0.00 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35
Residential Extra Service
Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Extra trash toter 1 X $6.81 $10.26 $13.71 $17.16 $20.61 $24.06 $27.51 Extra recycle toter 1 X $6.81 $10.26 $13.71 $17.16 $20.61 $24.06 $27.51 Extra green waste toter 1 X $6.81 $10.26 $13.71 $17.16 $20.61 $24.06 $27.51 2 Phased-in rates increase in even increments to reach targeted FY 29/30 rate. 1 Phased-in rates are for 96 gallon 1x per week commercial service, all commercial recycling services and all residential extra toter services.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Table 14
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2024/25 Bill Impacts
Scenario 2: Phase-In
Bill Impacts1
Number of
Customers
Current Rates
FY 2023/24
Proposed Rates
FY 2024/25
Rate Increase
FY 2024/25
Rate Increase
FY 2024/25
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month $ per Month % Increase
Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 112 $41.87 $52.15 $10.28 24.55%
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 4 $83.73 $104.29 $20.56 24.55%
2 yd bin 1 X 48 $145.46 $146.28 $0.82 0.56%
2 yd bin 2 X 11 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59%
3 yd bin 1 X 18 $218.18 $219.42 $1.24 0.57%
3 yd bin 2 X 15 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59%
4 yd bin 1 X 32 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59%
4 yd bin 2 X 53 $581.71 $585.13 $3.42 0.59%
6 yd bin 1 X 6 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59%
6 yd bin 2 X 14 $872.53 $877.69 $5.16 0.59%
Commercial Recycling Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 6 $20.95 $34.72 $13.77 65.71%
(2) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 $41.87 $69.40 $27.53 65.76%
2 yd bin 1 X 16 $72.74 $95.13 $22.39 30.78%
2 yd bin 2 X 2 $145.46 $190.24 $44.78 30.79%
3 yd bin 1 X 4 $109.10 $142.69 $33.59 30.78%
3 yd bin 2 X 2 $218.18 $285.36 $67.18 30.79%
4 yd bin 1 X 14 $145.46 $190.24 $44.78 30.79%
4 yd bin 2 X 12 $290.85 $380.43 $89.58 30.80%
6 yd bin 1 X 2 $218.18 $285.36 $67.18 30.79%
Commercial Organics Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 30 $13.94 $28.88 $14.94 107.14%
6 yd bin 1 X 1 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59%
Residential Three Toter Service
Residential Customers 1 X 6,635 $41.83 $43.98 $2.15 5.14% Low Income/Senior Customers 1 X 56 $31.83 $31.83 $0.00 0.00% Residential Extra Service
Extra green waste toter 1 X 20 $6.81 $10.26 $3.45 50.66% 1 Only services with customers are shown.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 15
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
FY 2024/25 Bill Impacts
Scenario Comparison Scenario 1: No Phase-In Scenario 2: Phase-In Bill Impact Comparison1
Number of
Customers
Current
Rates
FY 2023/24
Proposed
FY 24/25
Rates
Rate
Increase
FY 2024/25
Rate
Increase
FY 2024/25
Proposed
FY 24/25
Rates
Rate
Increase
FY 2024/25
Rate
Increase
FY 2024/25
Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate
Size Weekly
Frequency
# $ per Month $ per Month $ per Month % $ per Month $ per Month % (1) 96 gal toter 1 X 112 $41.87 $73.14 $31.27 74.68% $52.15 $10.28 24.55% (2) 96 gal toter 1 X 4 $83.73 $146.28 $62.55 74.70% $104.29 $20.56 24.55% 2 yd bin 1 X 48 $145.46 $146.28 $0.82 0.56% $146.28 $0.82 0.56% 2 yd bin 2 X 11 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59% $292.56 $1.71 0.59% 3 yd bin 1 X 18 $218.18 $219.42 $1.24 0.57% $219.42 $1.24 0.57% 3 yd bin 2 X 15 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59% $438.85 $2.58 0.59% 4 yd bin 1 X 32 $290.85 $292.56 $1.71 0.59% $292.56 $1.71 0.59% 4 yd bin 2 X 53 $581.71 $585.13 $3.42 0.59% $585.13 $3.42 0.59% 6 yd bin 1 X 6 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59% $438.85 $2.58 0.59% 6 yd bin 2 X 14 $872.53 $877.69 $5.16 0.59% $877.69 $5.16 0.59% Commercial Recycling Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 6 $20.95 $73.14 $52.19 249.12% $34.72 $13.77 65.71% (2) 96 gal toter 1 X 1 $41.87 $146.28 $104.41 249.37% $69.40 $27.53 65.76% 2 yd bin 1 X 16 $72.74 $146.28 $73.54 101.10% $95.13 $22.39 30.78% 2 yd bin 2 X 2 $145.46 $292.56 $147.10 101.13% $190.24 $44.78 30.79% 3 yd bin 1 X 4 $109.10 $235.88 $126.78 116.21% $142.69 $33.59 30.78% 3 yd bin 2 X 2 $218.18 $471.76 $253.58 116.23% $285.36 $67.18 30.79% 4 yd bin 1 X 14 $145.46 $292.56 $147.10 101.13% $190.24 $44.78 30.79% 4 yd bin 2 X 12 $290.85 $585.13 $294.28 101.18% $380.43 $89.58 30.80% 6 yd bin 1 X 2 $218.18 $438.85 $220.67 101.14% $285.36 $67.18 30.79% Commercial Organics Service
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X 30 $13.94 $73.14 $59.20 424.68% $28.88 $14.94 107.14% 6 yd bin 1 X 1 $436.27 $438.85 $2.58 0.59% $438.85 $2.58 0.59% Residential Three Toter Service
Residential Customers 1 X 6,635 $41.83 $43.98 $2.15 5.14% $43.98 $2.15 5.14% Low Income/Senior
Customers 1 X 56 $31.83 $31.83 $0.00 0.00% $31.83 $0.00 0.00% Residential Extra Service
Extra green waste toter 1 X 20 $6.81 $19.43 $12.62 185.32% $10.26 $3.45 50.66% 1 Only services with customers are shown.

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Table 16
City of Patterson, Solid Waste Rate Study
New Personnel and Equipment
Cost Inflation: 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Description Division Fiscal Year Total Cost Garbage Allocation FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 Administrative Assistant I/II Public Works Admin 2026/27 $94,021 50% 47,010 49,361 51,829 54,420 57,141 59,999 62,998 66,148 Accounting Technician Finance 2027/28 $125,324 30% 37,597 39,477 41,451 43,523 45,699 47,984 50,384 Part Time Public Works 2027/28 $0 50% - - - - - - -
Maintenance I C Public Works 2027/28 $0 50% - - - - - - - Maintenance I C Public Works 2027/28 $0 50% - - - - - - - Maintenance II C Parks 2027/28 $96,841 50% 48,421 50,842 53,384 56,053 58,856 61,798 64,888 Operations Supervisor Public Works 2027/28 $0 40% - - - - - - - Management Analyst Public Works 2029/30 $162,461 33% 53,612 56,293 59,107 62,063 65,166 Administrative Assistant I/II Public Works Admin 2030/31 $114,283 50% 57,142 59,999 62,999 66,149 Maintenance II C Parks 2030/31 $118,765 50% 59,382 62,351 65,469 68,742 Management Analyst Public Works 2032/33 $130,938 33% 43,210 45,370 Total Cost: $0 $0 $47,010 $135,379 $142,148 $202,867 $329,534 $346,011 $406,521 $426,847 Description Division Fiscal Year Total Cost Garbage Allocation FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31 FY 31-32 FY 32-33 FY 33-34 Mini Skid Steer Urban Forestry 2024/25 $55,000 50% 27,500 Equipment Trailer Urban Forestry 2024/25 $10,000 50% 5,000 Stump Grinder Urban Forestry 2025/26 $84,460 50% 42,230 10 YD Dump Garbage 2028/29 $601,000 50% 300,500
Gas Street Sweeper Streets 2027/28 $0 40%
Electric Street Sweeper Streets 2027/28 $0 40%
Utility Truck Urban Forestry 2031/32 $100,000 50% 50,000 Utility Truck Urban Forestry 2032/33 $100,000 100% 100,000 Utility Truck Urban Forestry 2033/34 $100,000 50% 50,000 Total Cost: $32,500 $42,230 $0 $0 $300,500 $0 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $50,000

9.2.a
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Bartle Wells Solid Waste Rate Study Report (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate {CW143593.1}
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-63

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE PROPOSITION 218 PROTEST PROCEEDING

AND ADOPTING A FIVE-YEAR SOLID WASTE RATE SCHEDULE
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2025
WHEREAS, solid waste service in the City of Patterson is provided in accordance with Chapters 6.12, 6.13, 6.14, and 6.15 of the Patterson Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Patterson City Council called and held a duly noticed protest proceeding on November 19, 2024 (pursuant to Resolution No. 2024-54), for the purpose of increasing rates, fees and charges for solid waste collection service in accordance with Proposition 218 (Article XIII D of the California Constitution) and Government Code § 53750 et seq.; and WHEREAS, in advance of the protest proceeding, a mailed notice (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A) was distributed to the property owners and ratepayers of record within the City of Patterson as of Stanislaus County’s last equalized assessment roll and the City’s latest ratepayer database; and
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, the City Council conducted the public hearing, received and considered public comments, and accepted protests delivered prior to the close of the public hearing; and
WHEREAS, the number of written protests by owners of parcels within the City against the increased rates were tabulated by the City Clerk at the scheduled Public Hearing and it was determined that the total protests received did not constitute a majority protest.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF PATTERSON CITY COUNCIL AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct.

Section 2. The City Council does hereby accept and close the Proposition 218 public notification and protest process with receipt of less than a majority protest vote, as declared by the Patterson City Clerk.

Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts the five (5) year rate schedule for solid waste collection services in accordance with the approved rate study, attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit B.

Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-63 Adopting New Garbage Rates (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) {CW143593.1}
The foregoing resolution of the City Council of the City of Patterson was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of November 2024, by ______________, who moved its adoption, which motion was duly seconded by _______________, and the resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:
_______________________________________
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of November 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:
___________________________________
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-63 Adopting New Garbage Rates (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) {CW143593.1}

EXHIBIT A
Proposition 218 Mailed Notice

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-63 Adopting New Garbage Rates (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) {CW143593.1}

EXHIBIT B
City of Patterson
Rate Schedule for Solid Waste Collection Service

9.2.b
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-63 Adopting New Garbage Rates (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) Exhibit
A- Mailed Proposition 218 Notice

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Exhibit A_Mailed Proposition 218 Notice (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Exhibit
A- Mailed Proposition 218 Notice (CONTINUED)

9.2.c
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Exhibit A_Mailed Proposition 218 Notice (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Exhibit B - Solid Waste 5-Year Rate Schedule
Current
January
1, 2025
July 1,
2025
July 1,
2026
July 1,
2027
July 1,
2028
July 1,
2029
Size Weekly
Frequency
Current Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Residential Three Toter Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) Residential Customers 1 X $41.83 $43.98 $47.28 $50.83 $54.64 $58.74 $62.26 Low
Income/Senior
Customers 1 X $31.83 $31.83 $31.83 $33.18 $34.53 $35.88 $37.23 Residential Extra Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service)
Extra trash
toter 1 X $6.81 $10.26 $13.71 $17.16 $20.61 $24.06 $27.51 Extra recycle
toter 1 X $6.81 $10.26 $13.71 $17.16 $20.61 $24.06 $27.51 Extra green
waste toter 1 X $6.81 $10.26 $13.71 $17.16 $20.61 $24.06 $27.51 Commercial Trash Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service)
(1) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 $52.15 $62.43 $72.71 $82.99 $93.27 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $83.73 $104.29 $124.84 $145.40 $165.96 $186.51 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92 Commercial Recycling Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $20.95 $34.72 $48.48 $62.25 $76.02 $89.78 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $41.87 $69.40 $96.94 $124.47 $152.00 $179.54 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $72.74 $95.13 $117.52 $139.91 $162.29 $184.68 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $145.46 $190.24 $235.02 $279.81 $324.59 $369.37 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $285.39 $352.55 $419.72 $486.88 $554.05 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $380.51 $470.07 $559.62 $649.17 $738.73 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $109.10 $142.69 $176.27 $209.86 $243.44 $277.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $218.18 $285.36 $352.53 $419.71 $486.88 $554.06 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $428.06 $528.81 $629.57 $730.32 $831.08 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $570.74 $705.08 $839.42 $973.76 $1,108.10 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $190.24 $235.02 $279.81 $324.59 $369.37 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $380.43 $470.00 $559.58 $649.16 $738.73 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $570.73 $705.07 $839.42 $973.76 $1,108.11 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $760.97 $940.09 $1,119.22 $1,298.35 $1,477.47 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $285.36 $352.53 $419.71 $486.88 $554.06 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $570.64 $705.00 $839.37 $973.73 $1,108.10 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $856.07 $1,057.59 $1,259.12 $1,460.64 $1,662.17 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,141.42 $1,410.12 $1,678.82 $1,947.52 $2,216.22 $2,484.92 Commercial Organics Service Monthly Rate ($ per Service) (1) 96 gal toter 1 X $13.94 $28.88 $43.81 $58.75 $73.68 $88.62 $103.55 (2) 96 gal toter 1 X $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 1 X $145.46 $146.28 $157.25 $169.04 $181.72 $195.35 $207.07 2 yd bin 2 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 2 yd bin 3 X $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 2 yd bin 4 X $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 3 yd bin 1 X $218.18 $219.42 $235.88 $253.57 $272.59 $293.03 $310.61 3 yd bin 2 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 3 yd bin 3 X $658.27 $707.64 $760.71 $817.76 $879.09 $931.84 3 yd bin 4 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 1 X $290.85 $292.56 $314.50 $338.09 $363.45 $390.71 $414.15 4 yd bin 2 X $581.71 $585.13 $629.01 $676.19 $726.90 $781.42 $828.31 4 yd bin 3 X $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 4 yd bin 4 X $1,170.26 $1,258.03 $1,352.38 $1,453.81 $1,562.85 $1,656.62 6 yd bin 1 X $436.27 $438.85 $471.76 $507.14 $545.18 $586.07 $621.23 6 yd bin 2 X $872.53 $877.69 $943.52 $1,014.28 $1,090.35 $1,172.13 $1,242.46 6 yd bin 3 X $1,316.54 $1,415.28 $1,521.43 $1,635.54 $1,758.21 $1,863.70 6 yd bin 4 X $1,755.39 $1,887.04 $2,028.57 $2,180.71 $2,344.26 $2,484.92 Scenario 2:

Proposed Rates

9.2.d
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Exhibit B_Solid Waste 5-Year Rate Schedule (Resolution No. 2024-63 Solid Waste Rate Schedule) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Fernando Ulloa, Interim City Manager
BY: Nubia Goldstein, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
ITEM NO: 9.3
SUBJECT: Approve First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No. 878 Reading by Title only, Waiving Further Reading an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Patterson Amending Chapter 16.44 of the Patterson Municipal Code (Dedication-Park and Recreation) to Update the City’s Quimby Ordinance; and Adopt Resolution No. 2024-65 Updating the Parkland InLieu Fee Charged to Subdivisions, Consistent with the City’s Existing Parkland Standard.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Approve First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance No. 878 Reading by Title only, Waiving Further Reading an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Patterson Amending Chapter 16.44 of the Patterson Municipal Code (Dedication-Park and Recreation) to Update the City’s Quimby Ordinance; and Adopt Resolution No. 2024-65 Updating the Parkland In-Lieu Fee Charged to Subdivisions, Consistent with the City’s Existing Parkland Standard.

BACKGROUND
The City’s “Quimby Ordinance” is located in Chapter 16.44 of the Patterson Municipal Code.

Pursuant to the authority of the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, § 66477, referred to as the “Quimby Act”), cities may adopt ordinances imposing a requirement for new subdivisions to dedicate area for parkland in order to maintain the city’s parkland standard. If parkland is not dedicated to the City on the subdivision map, then the City may collect in-lieu fees to pay for new parkland construction.

The City’s Quimby Ordinance was first adopted in 1976 and last updated in 1995. The City has undergone considerable growth since this time (specifically with adoption of the Villages Master

9.3 Packet Pg. 464
Plan, the Baldwin Ranch North project, and the recently approved Zacharias/Baldwin Ranch South Master Plan). There have also been updates to the state statute since this time.

City staff is proposing a comprehensive update to the Quimby Ordinance (Attachment 1). The Quimby Ordinance is outdated, having last been amended in 1995. It would assist staff to have the current state requirements included in the Quimby Ordinance chapter. Second, the City’s General Plan calls for a parkland standard of five (5) acres per one thousand (1,000) residents.

The existing Quimby Ordinance, however, provides a parkland standard of three (3) acres per 1,000 residents. Including the City’s updated parkland standard of 5 acres per 1,000 residents will ensure consistency between the City’s General Plan, the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan, the Subdivision Title in the Municipal Code, and applicable Master Plans that provide the same 5-acre standard. The proposed ordinance also contains additional requirements compared to the current ordinance, by providing clear application procedures for the Community Development Director when determining the parkland and fees required for new subdivisions.

In addition, at its meeting on October 15, 2024, the City Council adopted new development impact fees for City Hall, Corporation Yard, Transportation, Recreation Facilities, and Parks.

The Nexus Study containing the new parks impact fees also describes the new in-lieu fee to be charged to subdivisions (known as “Quimby Fees”). The proposed ordinance therefore also updates the in-lieu fee to be charged to subdivisions, consistent with the recently adopted Nexus Study. The new Quimby Fee is higher compared to the fee provided in the existing ordinance.

ANALYSIS
The City’s “Quimby Ordinance” is located in Chapter 16.44 of the Patterson Municipal Code.

The City’s Quimby Ordinance was first adopted in 1976 and last updated in 1995. The City has undergone considerable growth since this time (specifically with adoption of the Villages Master Plan, the Baldwin Ranch North project, and the recently approved Zacharias/Baldwin Ranch South Master Plan). There have also been updates to the state statute since this time.

9.3 Packet Pg. 465
In addition, at its meeting on October 15, 2024, the City Council adopted new development impact fees for City Hall, Corporation Yard, Transportation, Recreation Facilities, and Parks.

FISCAL IMPACT
This ordinance does not have an impact to the City’s General Fund. The ordinance would apply to subdivision applications received by the Community Development Department. Subdividers must dedicate parkland to the City for new subdivision applications, subject to the rules of the ordinance. In-lieu fees would be collected when the subdivision does not dedicate land and be deposited into the City’s parkland in-lieu fund. Funds collected can be used to develop and rehabilitate the City’s neighborhood and community parks.

COUNCIL OPTIONS

1. Introduce Ordinance No. 878 for first reading, and adopt Resolution No. 2024-65; or

2. Provide direction to staff with modifications to the proposed Ordinance No. 878 and Resolution No. 2024-65; or

3. Deny the Ordinance No.878 and Resolution No. 2024-65.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance No. 878

2. Resolution No. 2024-65
Exhibit A: Nexus Study by Willdan Financial Services (November 12, 2024)

3. Revisions to the Nexus Study prepared by Willdan Financial Services

4. Parkland Standard from City’s General Plan

9.3 Packet Pg. 466
{CW143125.8}
ORDINANCE NO. 878

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON AMENDING CHAPTER 16.44 OF THE PATTERSON MUNICIPAL CODE
(DEDICATION – PARK AND RECREATION), TO UPDATE THE CITY’S QUIMBY

ORDINANCE AND PARKLAND IN-LIEU FEE FOR SUBDIVISIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code § 66477, the legislative body of a city or county may, by ordinance, require the dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of subdivision maps, subject to certain requirements (referred to as the “Quimby Act”); and WHEREAS, the City’s Quimby Act ordinance was last updated in 1995; and WHEREAS, the City’s General Plan requires a minimum parkland standard of five (5) acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) residents (City of Patterson General Plan, PR-1.2, PR-1.3, PR1.5, PR-1.6); and WHEREAS, the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan provides for a minimum parkland standard of five (5) acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) residents (City of Patterson, Parks & Recreation Master Plan - 5.2); and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-59 updating various City Development Impact Fees and the corresponding Nexus Studies, including but not limited to, fees for the City’s Corporation Yard, City Hall, Recreation Facilities, and Parkland; and WHEREAS, the Nexus Study for the identified Development Impact Fees was prepared by Willdan Financial Services, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study identifies the fees to be charged for parkland and parkland improvements pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.) and for subdivisions pursuant to the Quimby Act (Gov. Code, § 66477); and WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to update the City’s Quimby Act ordinance, in accordance with the City’s existing parkland standard and the Nexus Study.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Ordinance No. 878 - Quimby Act Code Amendment (Attachment 1) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) {CW143125.8}
Section 1. Amendment to Patterson Municipal Code. Chapter 16.44 (Dedication-Park and Recreation), of Title 16 (Divisions of Land), of the Patterson Municipal Code, shall be repealed in its entirety and amended with a new Chapter 16.44, which shall read as follows:

Chapter 16.44

DEDICATION-PARK AND RECREATION
Sections:

16.44.010 Purpose.

16.44.020 General Standard.

16.44.030 Applicability.

16.44.040 Standards and Formula for Dedication of Land.

16.44.050 Dedication and Improvement Requirements.

16.44.060 Payment of Fees In Lieu of Land.

16.44.070 Private Parks and Recreation Areas.

16.44.010 Purpose.

This chapter is enacted pursuant to the authority granted by Government Code § Section 66477 and the City of Patterson General Plan. The need for park and recreation facilities results from increases in residential development. Therefore, as a condition of approval of a final map or parcel map, the applicant shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes at the time of approval of the parcel map or final map, in accordance with this chapter. The land, fees, or combination thereof are to be used only for the purpose of developing new or rehabilitating existing neighborhood or community parks and recreational facilities.

16.44.020 General Standard.

The City Council finds that the amount of existing neighborhood and community park areas exceeds three (3) acres per one thousand (1,000) persons residing in the City, and that the public interest, convenience, health, welfare, and safety require that five (5) acres of land for each one thousand (1,000) persons residing in the City be devoted to neighborhood and community park and recreational purposes.

16.44.030 Applicability.

A. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all residential subdivisions of five (5) parcels or more as a condition to approval.

B. For subdivisions of fewer than five (5) parcels, a condition may be placed on the approval of a subdivision map that if a building permit is requested for construction of a residential structure or structures on one (1) or more of the parcels within four (4) years, the fee may be required to be paid by the owner of each parcel as a condition of the issuance of the permit.

C. Whenever subsequent development occurs on property for which fees have already been paid or land dedicated, no additional fees or dedications shall be required except as to any additional lots or dwelling units that were not subject to a prior dedication or fee requirement.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Ordinance No. 878 - Quimby Act Code Amendment (Attachment 1) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) {CW143125.8}
D. The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to any of the following:
i. Industrial or commercial subdivisions.
ii. Condominium projects or stock cooperatives, which consists of the subdivision of airspace in an existing apartment building which is more than five (5) years old when no new dwelling units are added.
iii. Any other type of subdivision excluded from such requirements by the Subdivision Map Act.

16.44.040 Standards and Formula for Dedication of Land.

A. The formula for determining acreage to be dedicated is based on a standard of five (5) acres of park area per one thousand (1,000) members of the population. The formula for dedication of land shall be:

Average number of persons per unit /
1,000 population x
5 acres of parkland x
Number of units in subdivision =
______________________________________
Land area to be dedicated.

B. Subject to the approval of the Community Development Director, the average number of persons per unit may be adjusted for different types of residential development (for example, mobile homes, single-family, multifamily). Such requests shall be filed by the applicant and include a justification for applying a lower density per unit, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

C. Where more than one (1) dwelling unit will be located on a single lot, in order to determine the total number of units in the subdivision, the Community Development Director shall have the discretion to use the maximum allowed density of the applicable zoning designation. The applicant shall submit such information as may be reasonably requested by the Community Development Director, in order to determine the number of units in the subdivision.

D. Other open space areas included in the subdivision, such as dual-use drainage basins or buffer areas, may be eligible to satisfy the land dedication requirement, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director.

16.44.050 Dedication and Improvement Requirements.

The following parkland dedication and improvement requirements will apply to the filing of parcel maps, tentative maps, and final maps:

A. Whenever a subdivision map is submitted to the City, the applicant shall consult with the Community Development Director to determine whether parkland, in-lieu fees, or a

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Ordinance No. 878 - Quimby Act Code Amendment (Attachment 1) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) {CW143125.8}
combination of both, shall be dedicated for parks and recreational purposes. If land will be dedicated, it shall be so designated in the land area on the submitted map.

B. The Community Development Director shall determine the suitability of the applicant's proposal for parkland or fees, or both, to serve the subdivision. The amount and location of the parkland to be dedicated shall be determined by the Community Development Director.

C. If land is to be dedicated, the applicant may be conditioned to construct the park improvements in accordance with City standards. Conceptual plans for the park improvements shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director for consistency with the City’s General Plan, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, and other Specific Plans or Master Plans (as may applicable).

D. If parkland is to be dedicated, park improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. An agreement and securities shall be posted prior to approval of the final map to guarantee construction of the parkland to City standards.

E. The Community Development Director may impose conditions on the timing of construction of the parkland improvements in relation to availability of units in the subdivision.

F. The applicant and the City may enter into a park development agreement that provides for the schedule, design, fee credits, construction, and completion of the park improvements.

G. If land is to be dedicated, such dedication shall be accomplished by dedication on the Final Map or by Grant Deed. Parkland shall be dedicated to the City in fee title. Dedicated parkland will be considered accepted when accepted by the City Council.

H. Prior to acceptance by the City Council, the parkland shall be free and clear of all encumbrances except those that the City accepts in writing. An environmental site assessment report may be required to determine that the land is free from toxic or hazardous materials. The applicant shall include a preliminary title report and title insurance in favor of the City, in an amount approved by the City.

16.44.060 Payment of Fees In Lieu of Land.

A. The fee paid in lieu of land dedication for a proposed subdivision shall be set by resolution of the City Council.

B. For purposes of calculating the in-lieu fee, in order to determine the total units in the subdivision, the Community Development Director shall have the discretion to use the maximum allowed density of the applicable zoning designation. The applicant shall submit such information as may be reasonably requested by the Community Development Director, in order to determine the number of anticipated units in the subdivision.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Ordinance No. 878 - Quimby Act Code Amendment (Attachment 1) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) {CW143125.8}
C. All park in-lieu fees required to be paid pursuant to this chapter shall be paid as a condition of and upon approval of a parcel map or final map, and shall be deposited into the park inlieu fund.

D. For subdivisions containing fifty (50) parcels or fewer, the City may allow the applicant to only pay fees, except that when a condominium project, stock cooperative, or community apartment project exceeds 50 dwelling units, dedication of land may be required notwithstanding that the number of parcels may be fewer than 50.

16.44.070 Private Parks and Recreation Areas.

Where private park and recreation areas are proposed within a subdivision to be privately-owned and maintained, the following requirements apply:

A. The applicant is eligible to receive credit for the private open space within the development which is usable for active recreational uses, subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director may grant up to full credit toward the City’s land dedication requirement, depending on the amount of parkland available to the general public. If the private open space within the development is restricted from public use, then the Community Development Director may grant up to fifty percent (50%) credit toward the City’s land dedication requirement.

B. Evidence shall be provided that ownership and maintenance of the private park will be adequately provided for in perpetuity by recorded written agreement, covenants, or restrictions. Any such document and subsequent amendments shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Director.

Section 2. Severability.

If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.

Section 3. Publication and Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council and following the affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the City Council. Within fifteen (15) days of its adoption, a summary of the Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Patterson, California, which summary shall include the names of those Council Members voting for and against the Ordinance. A certified copy of the full text of such adopted ordinance or amendment shall be on file in the office of the City Clerk.

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Ordinance No. 878 - Quimby Act Code Amendment (Attachment 1) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) {CW143125.8}
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Patterson, held on the 19th day of November 2024, by __________________, who moved its introduction, which motion was duly seconded by ___________________. Said Ordinance was given a second reading at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the ___, day of __________, 2023, and after such reading, _________________ moved its adoption, seconded by , and said Ordinance was thereupon adopted by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:
___________________________________
Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

9.3.a
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Ordinance No. 878 - Quimby Act Code Amendment (Attachment 1) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) {CW143747.3}
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-65

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON

UPDATING THE PARKLAND IN-LIEU FEE FOR SUBDIVISIONS,
CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY’S PARKLAND STANDARD OF
5 ACRES PER 1,000 RESIDENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code § 66477, the legislative body of a city or county may, by ordinance, require the dedication of land or impose a requirement of the payment of fees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park or recreational purposes as a condition to the approval of subdivision maps, subject to certain requirements (referred to as the “Quimby Act”); and WHEREAS, the City’s Quimby Act ordinance was last updated in 1995; and WHEREAS, the City’s General Plan requires a minimum parkland standard of five (5) acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) residents (City of Patterson General Plan, PR-1.2, PR-1.3, PR1.5, PR-1.6); and WHEREAS, the City’s Parks & Recreation Master Plan provides for a minimum parkland standard of five (5) acres of parkland per one thousand (1,000) residents (City of Patterson, Parks & Recreation Master Plan - 5.2); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Quimby Act (Gov. Code, § 66477(a)), the City may adopt a parkland standard not to exceed five (5) acres per one thousand (1,000) persons residing within a subdivision; and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-59 updating various City Development Impact Fees and the corresponding Nexus Studies, including but not limited to, fees for the City’s Corporation Yard, City Hall, Recreation Facilities, and Parkland; and WHEREAS, the Nexus Study for the identified Development Impact Fees was prepared by Willdan Financial Services, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the Nexus Study identifies the fees to be charged for parkland and parkland improvements pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code, § 66000 et seq.), and also for subdivisions pursuant to the Quimby Act (Gov. Code, § 66477) (referred to as the “Quimby InLieu Fee”); and WHEREAS, the Quimby In-Lieu Fee described in the Willdan Study shall be based on the City’s existing parkland standard of five (5) acres per one thousand (1,000) residents; and WHEREAS, Willdan Financial Services has prepared a revision to the Nexus Study to make the Quimby In-Lieu Fee based on the City’s existing parkland standard, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this resolution is to update the Quimby In-Lieu Fee consistent with the City’s existing parkland standard.

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-65 Update to Quimby In-Lieu Fee for Willdan Study (Attachment 2) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- {CW143747.3}
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Patterson as follows:

1. The findings set forth in the recitals and the attached Nexus Study are hereby incorporated and made part of this Resolution.

2. The City Council hereby approves the update to the Nexus Study attached and incorporated hereto as Exhibit A.

3. All other provisions of Resolution No. 2024-59 adopted on October 15, 2024, not otherwise in conflict with this Resolution, shall remain in full force and effect.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was passed by the City Council at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of November 2024 and the Resolution adopted by the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVED:

Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:
___________________________
Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct, and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of said City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of November 2024, and I further certify that said Resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATED:
________________________ _
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-65 Update to Quimby In-Lieu Fee for Willdan Study (Attachment 2) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- {CW143747.3}
EXHIBIT “A”

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY

WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES

9.3.b
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-65 Update to Quimby In-Lieu Fee for Willdan Study (Attachment 2) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-

CITY OF PATTERSON

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY
UPDATE

REVISED
NOVEMBER 12, 2024
Oakland Office Corporate Office Other Regional Offices
66 Franklin Street 27368 Via Industria Aurora, CO
Suite 300 Suite 200 Orlando, FL
Oakland, CA 94607 Temecula, CA 92590 Phoenix, AZ
Tel: (510) 832-0899 Tel: (800) 755-6864 Plano, TX
Fax: (888) 326-6864 Seattle, WA
Washington, DC
www.willdan.com

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- This page intentionally left blank.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 3 Background and Study Objectives 3
Facility Standards and Costs 3
Use of Fee Revenues 4
Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary 4
Other Funding Needed 5

1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 6 Public Facilities Financing in California 6
Study Objectives 6
Fee Program Maintenance 7
Study Methodology 7
Types of Facility Standards 7
New Development Facility Needs and Costs 8
Organization of the Report 9

2. GROWTH FORECASTS ............................................................... 10 Land Use Types 10
Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units 10
Existing and Future Development 11
Occupant Densities 11

3. CITY HALL FACILITIES................................................................ 13 Service Population 13
Facility Inventories and Standards 13
Existing Inventory 13
Cost Allocation 14
Fee Revenue Projection 14
Fee Schedule 15

4. CORPORATION YARD FACILITIES ................................................ 16 Service Population 16
Facility Inventories and Standards 16
Existing Inventory 16
Cost Allocation 17
Fee Revenue Projection 18
Fee Schedule 18

5. RECREATION FACILITIES............................................................ 20 Service Population 20
Existing Recreation and Community Center Facilities Inventory 20 Planned Recreation and Community Center Facilities 21
Cost Allocation 22

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
ii
Existing Level of Service 22
Future Level of Service 22
Use of Fee Revenue 23
Fee Revenue Projection 23
Fee Schedule 23

6. PARK FACILITIES....................................................................... 25 Service Population 25
Existing Parkland and Park Facilities Inventory 25
Parkland and Park Facility Standards 27
Mitigation Fee Act 27
Quimby Act 27
City of Patterson Parkland and Park Facilities Standards 27 Parkland and Park Facilities Unit Costs 28
Facilities Needed to Accommodate New Development 28
Parks Cost per Capita 30
Use of Fee Revenue 31
Fee Schedule 31

7. AB 602 REQUIREMENTS............................................................ 32 Compliance with AB 602 32
66016.5. (a) (2) - Level of Service 32
66016.5. (a) (4) – Review of Original Fee Assumptions 32 66016.5. (a) (5) – Residential Fees per Square Foot 33
66016.5. (a) (6) – Capital Improvement Plan 33

8. IMPLEMENTATION...................................................................... 35 Impact Fee Program Adoption Process 35
Inflation Adjustment 35
Reporting Requirements 35
Programming Revenues and Projects with the CIP 37

9. MITIGATION FEE ACT FINDINGS.................................................. 38 Purpose of Fee 38
Use of Fee Revenues 38
Benefit Relationship 38
Burden Relationship 38
Proportionality 39

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 3 Executive Summary
This report summarizes an analysis of development impact fees needed to support future development in The City of Patterson through buildout. It is the City’s intent that the costs representing future development’s share of public facilities and capital improvements be imposed on that development in the form of a development impact fee, also known as a public facilities fee. The public facilities and improvements included in this analysis are divided into the fee categories listed below:
▪ City Hall Facilities  Recreation Facilities
▪ Corporation Yard Facilities  Parks
Background and Study Objectives
The primary policy objective of a development impact fee program is to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. The primary purpose of this report is to calculate and present fees that will enable the City to expand its inventory of public facilities, as new development creates increases in service demands.

The City imposes public facilities fees under authority granted by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act), contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. This report provides the necessary findings required by the Act for adoption of the fees presented in the fee schedules contained herein.

Facility Standards and Costs
There are three approaches typically used to calculate facilities standards and allocate the costs of planned facilities to accommodate growth in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act requirements.

The system plan approach is based on a master facility plan in situations where the needed facilities serve both existing and new development. This approach allocates existing and planned facilities across existing and new development to determine new development’s fair share of facility needs. This approach is used when it is not possible to differentiate the benefits of new facilities between new and existing development. Often the system plan is based on increasing facility standards, so the City must find non-impact fee revenue sources to fund existing development’s fair share of planned facilities. This approach is used for the recreation facility fees in this report.

The existing inventory approach is based on a facility standard derived from the City’s existing level of facilities and existing demand for services. This approach results in no facility deficiencies attributable to existing development. This approach is often used when a long-range plan for new facilities is not available. Impact fee funding for future facilities to serve growth is programmed through an annual capital improvement plan and budget process. This approach is to calculate the city hall, corporation yard and parks fees in this report.

The planned facilities approach allocates costs based on the ratio of planned facilities that serve new development to the increase in demand associated with new development. This approach is appropriate when specific planned facilities that only benefit new development can be identified, or when the specific share of facilities benefiting new development can be identified. Examples include street improvements to avoid deficient levels of service or a sewer trunk line extension to a previously undeveloped area. This approach is not used in this report.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
4 Use of Fee Revenues
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that this analysis “Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged.” 1 Each chapter in this report identifies the appropriate use of impact fee revenues for each impact fee category.

Impact fee revenue must be spent on new facilities or expansion of current facilities to serve new development. Facilities can be generally defined as capital acquisition items with a useful life greater than five years. Impact fee revenue can be spent on capital facilities to serve new development, including but not limited to land acquisition, construction of buildings, infrastructure, the acquisition of vehicles or equipment, information technology, software licenses and equipment.

Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary
Table E.1 summarizes the development impact fees that meet the City’s identified needs and comply with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

Table E.1: Development Impact Facilities Fee Summary
Land Use City Hall
Corporate
Yard
Recreation
Facilities
Parks -
Subdivisions1
Parks - Non
Subdivisions2
Total -
Subdivisions
Total - Non
Subdivisions
All Fees Charged per Square Foot
Residential $ 0.57 $ 1.43 $ 1.88 $ 2.55 $ 2.46 $ 6.43 $ 6.34 Nonresidential
Commercial $ 0.22 $ 0.55 $ - $ - $ - $ 0.77 $ 0.77
Office 0.34 0.85 - - - 1.19 1.19
Industrial 0.12 0.30 - - - 0.42 0.42
1 Subdivisions pay Quimby Fee in Lieu of land dedication, plus Mitigation Fee Act fee for park improvements. See Table 6.8 for more detail.

Sources: Tables 3.5, 4.5, 5.6, and 6.8.
2 Infill developments pay Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition, plus Mitigation Fee Act fee for park improvements. See Table 6.8 for more detail.
1 California Government Code §66001 (a) (2).

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
5 Other Funding Needed
Impact fees may only fund the share of public facilities related to new development in Patterson.

They may not be used to fund the share of facility needs generated by existing development or by development outside of the City. As shown in Table E.2, approximately $8.4 million in additional funding will be needed to complete the facility projects the City currently plans to develop. The “Additional Funding Required” column shows non-impact fee funding required to fund a share of the improvements partially funded by impact fees. Non-fee funding is needed because these facilities are needed partially to remedy existing deficiencies and partly to accommodate new development.

The City will need to develop alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

Table E.2: Non-Impact Fee Funding Required
Fee Category
Net Project
Cost
Projected
Impact Fee
Revenue
Additional
Funding
Required
City Hall $ 16,470,449 $ 16,470,449 $ -
Corporate Yard 41,529,783 41,529,783 -
Recreation Facilities 54,140,606 45,705,361 8,435,245
Parkland1 11,453,650 11,453,650 -
Park Improvements 48,225,840 48,225,840 -
Total $ 171,820,328 $ 163,385,083 $ 8,435,245
Sources: Tables 3.4, 4.4, 5.5, 6.5 and 6.6.
1 Project cost amount show n for Mitigation Fee Act Fees. Refer to Table 6.5 for Quimby in-lieu fee revenue estimates.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 6 1. Introduction
This report presents an analysis of the need for public facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Patterson. This chapter provides background for the study and explains the study approach under the following sections:
• Public Facilities Financing in California;
• Study Objectives;
• Fee Program Maintenance;
• Study Methodology; and,
• Organization of the Report.

Public Facilities Financing in California
The changing fiscal landscape in California during the past 45 years has steadily undercut the financial capacity of local governments to fund infrastructure. Three dominant trends stand out:
• The passage of a string of tax limitation measures, starting with Proposition 13 in 1978 and continuing through the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996; • Declining popular support for bond measures to finance infrastructure for the next generation of residents and businesses;
• Unfunded state and federal mandates; and,
• Steep reductions in federal and state assistance.

Faced with these trends, many cities and counties have had to adopt a policy of “growth pays its own way.” This policy shifts the burden of funding infrastructure expansion from existing ratepayers and taxpayers onto new development. This funding shift has been accomplished primarily through the imposition of assessments, special taxes, and development impact fees also known as public facilities fees. Assessments and special taxes require the approval of property owners and are appropriate when the funded facilities are directly related to the developing property. Development impact fees, on the other hand, are an appropriate funding source for facilities that benefit all development jurisdiction-wide. Development impact fees need only a majority vote of the legislative body for adoption.

Study Objectives
The primary policy objective of a public facilities fee program is to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. The primary purpose of this report is to update the City’s impact fees based on the most current available facility plans and growth projections. The proposed fees will enable the City to expand its inventory of public facilities as new development leads to increases in service demands.

Patterson is forecast to significant growth through this study’s planning horizon of buildout. This growth will create an increase in demand for public services and the facilities required to deliver them. Given the revenue challenges described above, Patterson has decided to use a development impact fee program to ensure that new development funds the share of facility costs

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
7 associated with growth. This report makes use of the most current available growth forecasts and facility plans to update the City’s existing fee program to ensure that the fee program accurately represents the facility needs resulting from new development.

Fee Program Maintenance
Once a fee program has been adopted it must be properly maintained to ensure that the revenue collected adequately funds the facilities needed by new development. To avoid collecting inadequate revenue, the inventories of existing facilities and costs for planned facilities must be updated periodically for inflation, and the fees recalculated to reflect the higher costs. The use of established indices for each facility included in the inventories (land, buildings, and equipment), such as the California Construction Cost Index, is necessary to accurately adjust the impact fees.

For a list of recommended indices, see Chapter 8.

While fee updates using inflation indices are appropriate for annual or periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, it is recommended to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available. For further detail on fee program implementation, see Chapter 8.

Study Methodology
Development impact fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The six steps followed in this development impact fee study include:

1. Estimate existing development and future growth: Identify a base year for existing development and a growth forecast that reflects increased demand for public facilities;

2. Identify facility standards: Determine the facility standards used to plan for new and expanded facilities;

3. Determine facilities required to serve new development: Estimate the total amount of planned facilities, and identify the share required to accommodate new development;

4. Determine the cost of facilities required to serve new development: Estimate the total amount and the share of the cost of planned facilities required to accommodate new development;

5. Calculate fee schedule: Allocate facilities costs per unit of new development to calculate the development impact fee schedule; and

6. Identify alternative funding requirements: Determine if any non-fee funding is required to complete projects.

The key public policy issue in development impact fee studies is the identification of facility standards (step #2, above). Facility standards document a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for new facilities. Standards ensure that new development does not fund deficiencies associated with existing development.

Types of Facility Standards
There are three separate components of facility standards:
 Demand standards determine the amount of facilities required to accommodate growth, for example, park acres per thousand residents, square feet of library space per capita, or gallons of water per day. Demand standards may also reflect a level of service such as the vehicle volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio used in traffic planning.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
8  Design standards determine how a facility should be designed to meet expected demand, for example, park improvement requirements and technology infrastructure for City office space. Design standards are typically not explicitly evaluated as part of an impact fee analysis but can have a significant impact on the cost of facilities. Our approach incorporates the cost of planned facilities built to satisfy the City’s facility design standards.
 Cost standards are an alternate method for determining the amount of facilities required to accommodate growth based on facility costs per unit of demand. Cost standards are useful when demand standards were not explicitly developed for the facility planning process. Cost standards also enable different types of facilities to be analyzed based on a single measure (cost or value) and are useful when different facilities are funded by a single fee program. Examples include facility costs per capita, cost per vehicle trip, or cost per gallon of water per day.

New Development Facility Needs and Costs
A number of approaches are used to identify facility needs and costs to serve new development.

This is often a two-step process: (1) identify total facility needs, and (2) allocate to new development its fair share of those needs.

There are three common methods for determining new development’s fair share of planned facilities costs: the system plan method, the planned facilities method, and the existing inventory method. The formula used by each approach and the advantages and disadvantages of each method is summarized below:

System Plan Method
This method calculates the fee based on the value of existing facilities plus the cost of planned facilities, divided by demand from existing plus new development:

Value of Existing Facilities + Cost of Planned Facilities Existing + New Development Demand
This method is useful when planned facilities need to be analyzed as part of a system that benefits both existing and new development. It is difficult, for example, to allocate a new fire station solely to new development when that station will operate as part of an integrated system of fire stations that together achieve the desired level of service.

The system plan method ensures that new development does not pay for existing deficiencies.

Often facility standards based on policies such as those found in General Plans are higher than the existing facility standards. This method enables the calculation of the existing deficiency required to bring existing development up to the policy-based standard. The local agency must secure non-fee funding for that portion of planned facilities required to correct the deficiency to ensure that new development receives the level of service funded by the impact fee. This approach is used for the recreation facility fees in this report.

Existing Inventory Method
The existing inventory method allocates costs based on the ratio of existing facilities to demand from existing development as follows:

Current Value of Existing Facilities
Existing Development Demand
Under this method new development will fund the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition the existing inventory method results in no facility deficiencies attributable to existing development. This method is often used when a longrange plan for new facilities is not available. Only the initial facilities to be funded with fees are = $/unit of demand
= $/unit of demand

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
9 identified in the fee study. Impact fee funding for future facilities to serve growth is programmed through an annual capital improvement plan and budget process. This approach is to calculate the city hall, corporation yard, and park fees in this report.

Planned Facilities Method
The planned facilities method allocates costs based on the ratio of planned facility costs to demand from new development as follows:

Cost of Planned Facilities
New Development Demand
This method is appropriate when planned facilities will entirely serve new development, or when a fair share allocation of planned facilities to new development can be estimated. An example of the former is a Wastewater trunk line extension to a previously undeveloped area. An example of the latter is a portion of a roadway that has been identified as necessary to mitigate the impact from new development through traffic modeling analysis. Under this method new development will fund the expansion of facilities at the standards used in the applicable planning documents. This approach is not used in this report.

Organization of the Report
The determination of a public facilities fee begins with the selection of a planning horizon and development of growth projections for population and employment. These projections are used throughout the analysis of different facility categories and are summarized in Chapter 2.

Chapters 3 through 6 identify facility standards and planned facilities, allocate the cost of planned facilities between new development and other development, and identify the appropriate development impact fee for each of the following facility categories:
▪ City Hall Facilities  Recreation Facilities
▪ Corporation Yard Facilities  Parks
Chapter 7 describes how this nexus studies complies with the requirements of AB 602.

Chapter 8 details the procedures that the City must follow when implementing a development impact fee program. Impact fee program adoption procedures are found in California Government Code Sections 66016 through 66018.

The five statutory findings required for adoption of the proposed public facilities fees in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act are documented in Chapter 9. = $/unit of demand

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 10 2. Growth Forecasts
Growth projections are used as indicators of demand to determine facility needs and allocate those needs between existing and new development. This chapter explains the source for the growth projections used in this study based on a 2023 base year and a planning horizon of buildout.

Estimates of existing development and projections of future growth are critical assumptions used throughout this report. These estimates are used as follows:
• The estimate of existing development in 2023 is used as an indicator of existing facility demand and to determine existing facility standards. • The estimate of total development at buildout is used as an indicator of future demand to determine total facilities needed to accommodate growth and remedy existing facility deficiencies, if any.
• Estimates of growth from 2023 through buildout are used to (1) allocate facility costs between new development and existing development, and (2) estimate total fee revenues.

The demand for public facilities is based on the service population, dwelling units or nonresidential development creating the need for the facilities.

Land Use Types
To ensure a reasonable relationship between each fee and the type of development paying the fee, growth projections distinguish between different land use types. The land use types that impact fees have been calculated for are defined below. • Residential: All residential dwelling units. Fees charged per square foot of living space.
• Commercial: All commercial, retail, educational, and hotel/motel development. • Office: All general, professional, and medical office development. • Industrial: All manufacturing, warehousing, and other industrial development.

Some developments may include more than one land use type, such as a mixed-use development with both multifamily and commercial uses. Another similar situation would be a warehousing facility that contains office space. In those cases, the facilities fee would be calculated separately for each land use type included within the building.

The City has the discretion to determine which land use type best reflects a development project’s characteristics for purposes of imposing an impact fee and may adjust fees for special or unique uses to reflect the impact characteristics of the use.

Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units
The California State Legislature recently amended requirements on local agencies for the imposition of development impact fees on accessory dwelling units (ADU) with Assembly Bill AB 68 in 2021. The amendment to California Government Code §65852.2(f)(2) stipulates that local agencies may not impose any impact fees on ADU less than 750 square feet. ADU greater than 750 square feet can be charged impact fees in proportion to the size of the primary dwelling unit.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
11 Calculating Impact Fees for Accessory Dwelling Units For ADUs greater than 750 square feet, impact fees can be charged as a percentage of the single family impact fee. The formula is:

𝐴𝐷𝑈 𝑆𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝑡
𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑆𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝑡
× 𝑆𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒 𝐹𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑦 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝐹𝑒𝑒 = 𝐴𝐷𝑈 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝐹𝑒𝑒
In the case of an 800 square foot ADU and a 1,600 square foot primary residence, the impact fees would be 50 percent (800 square feet / 1,600 square feet = 50%) of the single family dwelling unit fee.

Existing and Future Development
Table 2.1 shows the estimated number of residents and employees in Patterson, both in 2023 and at buildout. The base year estimates of residents come from the California Department of Finance. The projection of future residents comes from the City’s General Plan.

Base year employees were estimated based on data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau’s OnTheMap Application. Total employees at buildout were also identified in the City’s General Plan.

Table 2.1: Demographic Assumptions
2023 Buildout Increase
Residents1
24,314 66,673 42,359
Employment2
5,861 32,196 26,335
1 Current population from California Department of Finance (DOF). Projection for buildout based on the City's General Plan.
2 Existing estimates based on data from OnTheMap. Excludes local government employees. Projection for buildout based on the City's General Plan.

Sources: California Department of Finance (DOF), Table E-5, 2023; U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics 2018; City of Patterson; Willdan Financial Services.

Occupant Densities
All fees in this report are calculated based on building square feet. Occupant density assumptions ensure a reasonable relationship between the size of a development project, the increase in service population associated with new building square footage, and the amount of the fee.

Occupant densities (residents per dwelling unit or workers per building square foot) are used to estimate the increase in service population associated with new development. The fee imposed should be based on the land use type that most closely represents the probable occupant density of the development.

The average occupant density factors used in this report are shown in Table 2.2. The residential density factor is based on data for Patterson from the 2021 U.S. Census’ American Community Survey, the most recent data available. The nonresidential occupancy factors are derived from data from the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
12 Table 2.2: Occupant Density
Residential 3.46 Residents per Dwelling Unit
Nonresidential
Commercial 2.12 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Office 3.26 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Industrial 1.16 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, Tables B25024 and B25033; ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition; Willdan Financial Services.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 13 3. City Hall Facilities
The purpose of the fee is to ensure that new development funds its fair share of city hall facilities.

A fee schedule is presented based on the planned facilities standard of city hall facilities in the City of Patterson to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs.

Service Population
City hall facilities serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 3.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for city hall facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. The 0.31-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by the total number of non-work hours in a week (128) and reflects the degree to which nonresidential development yields a lesser demand for city hall facilities.

Table 3.1: City Hall Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 24,314 5,861 26,131
New Development (2023-Buildout) 42,359 26,335 50,523
Total (Buildout) 66,673 32,196 76,654
Weighting Factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s police facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
This study uses the existing standard methodology to calculate fees for city hall facilities. The city hall inventory is comprised of City Hall and the parcel of land on which it is located. The estimated cost per acre of land is based on an appraisal conducted for the City by the Hillas Appraisal Company in 2023. The replacement cost for the City Hall building is based on information provided by the City for use in this study. In total, the City owns $8.5 million worth of City Hall facilities.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
14 Table 3.2: City Hall Facilities Inventory
Inventory Unit Cost
Replacement
Cost
City Hall
Land 0.33 $ 65,000 $ 21,600
Building 17,000 500 8,500,000
Total $ 8,521,600
Sources: PEPIP-CA Property Schedule, February 21, 2022, City of Patterson; City of Patterson; Willdan Financial Services.

Cost Allocation
Table 3.3 shows the calculation of the existing cost per capita facility standard by dividing the value of the existing facilities inventory by the existing service population. The resulting cost per capita is the basis of the impact fee. Funding facilities at this level will ensure that as development occurs, new development will contribute to city hall facilities at the same standard that existing development has contributed thus far. Using the existing standard methodology does not result in existing deficiencies.

Table 3.3: City Hall Facilities Existing Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 8,521,600
Existing Service Population 26,131
Cost per Capita $ 326
Facility Standard per Resident $ 326
Facility Standard per Worker1 101
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 3.1 and 3.2; Willdan Financial Services.

Fee Revenue Projection
The City plans to use city hall facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of city hall and administrative facilities to serve new development. Table 3.4 details a projection of fee revenue, based on the service population growth increment identified in Table

3.1. The City will have to identify $16.5 million worth of city hall facilities in order to ensure that the existing standard is maintained through buildout.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
15 Table 3.4: Revenue Projection - Existing Standard
Cost per Capita $ 326
Growth in Service Population (2023 - Buildout) 50,523
Fee Revenue $ 16,470,449
Sources: Tables 3.1 and 3.3.

Fee Schedule
Table 3.5 shows the maximum justified city hall facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space).

The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the average square footage of dwelling units built within the past two years in Patterson.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 3.5: Maximum Justified City Hall Facilities Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Base Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential $ 326 3.46 $ 1,128 $ 23 $ 1,151 $ 0.57
Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 101 2.12 $ 214 $ 4 $ 218 $ 0.22
Office 101 3.26 329 7 336 0.34
Industrial 101 1.16 117 2 119 0.12
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit (residential) or per 1,000 square feet (nonresidential).

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 3.3; Willdan Financial Services 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes average residential dw elling unit is 2,023 square feet based on building permit data from 2020 and 2021.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 16 4. Corporation Yard Facilities
The purpose of the corporation yard facilities impact fee is to fund the corporation yard facilities needed to serve new development. A proposed fee is presented based on the system plan standard of corporation yard facilities per capita.

Service Population
Corporation yard facilities serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 4.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for corporation yard facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. The 0.31-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by the total number of non-work hours in a week (128) and reflects the degree to which nonresidential development yields a lesser demand for corporation yard facilities.

Table 4.1: Corporation Yard Facilities Service Population Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 24,314 5,861 26,131
New Development (2023-Buildout) 42,359 26,335 50,523
Total (Buildout) 66,673 32,196 76,654
Weighting Factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1, Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s corporation yard facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
Table 4.2 summarizes the City’s current inventory of land, buildings and vehicles. The City currently operates out two facilities: the corporation yard and the old corporation yard. Multiple buildings are located at each facility. Beyond buildings and land, the City has also made significant investments in vehicles, machinery, heavy equipment and solar panels. Note that the City’s property schedule, which lists building space and building replacement costs was the basis for the facilities shown in this inventory. Costs from that document have been increased to account for inflation, based on recent City cost estimates for an administrative building. The estimated cost per acre of land is based on an appraisal conducted for the City by the Hillas Appraisal Company in 2023. In total, the City owns $21.5 million in corporation yard facilities.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
17 Table 4.2: Corporation Yard Facilities Existing Inventory Inventory Unit Cost Value
Land (acres)
Corporation Yard 16215 Baldwin 6.00 $ 65,000 $ 390,000
Old Corporation Yard 420 S. 4th St. 0.42 65,000 27,300
Subtotal 6.42 $ 417,300
Corporation Yard Buildings
Public Administration Building 12,000 $ 500 $ 6,000,000 Vehicle Building B1 3,125 169 528,125
Vehicle Building B2 3,125 169 528,125
Vehicle Building C1 5,000 169 845,000
Vehicle Building C2 5,000 169 845,000
Equipment Storage Building D 4,500 182 819,000
Subtotal 32,750 $ 9,565,250
Old Corporation Yard Buildings
Public Works Garage 6,970 $ 198 $ 1,380,060
Office Building 960 179 171,840
Subtotal 7,930 $ 1,551,900
Public Works Vehicle Inventory
Heavy Duty Trucks $ 2,064,000
Light Duty Trucks 1,721,000
Machinery & Equipment 5,788,500
Total $ 9,573,500
Corporation Yard Solar Panels $ 368,000
Total Value of Existing Facilities $21,475,950
Sources: PEPIP-CA Property Schedule, February 21, 2022, City of Patterson; Willdan Financial Services.

Cost Allocation
Table 4.3 shows the calculation of the existing cost per capita facility standard by dividing the value of the existing facilities inventory by the existing service population. The resulting cost per capita is the basis of the impact fee. Funding facilities at this level will ensure that as development occurs, new development will contribute to city hall facilities at the same standard that existing development has contributed thus far. Using the existing standard methodology does not result in existing deficiencies.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
18 Table 4.3: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 21,475,950
Existing Service Population 26,131
Cost per Capita $ 822
Facility Standard per Resident $ 822
Facility Standard per Worker1
255
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 4.1 and 4.2; Willdan Financial Services.

Fee Revenue Projection
The City plans to use corporation yard facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of corporation yard facilities to serve new development. Table 4.4 details a projection of fee revenue, based on the service population growth increment identified in Table 4.1. The City will have to identify $41.5 million worth of facilities in order to ensure that the existing standard is maintained through the planning horizon.

Table 4.4: Fee Revenue Projection
Cost per Capita $ 822
Growth in Service Population (2023 - Buildout) 50,523
Fee Revenue $ 41,529,783
Sources: Tables 4.1 and 4.3.

Fee Schedule
Table 4.5 shows the maximum justified corporation yard facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space). The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the average square footage of dwelling units built within the past two years in Patterson.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
19 charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 4.5: Maximum Justified Corporation Yard Facilities Impact Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential $ 822 3.46 $ 2,844 $ 57 $ 2,901 $ 1.43
Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 255 2.12 $ 541 $ 11 $ 552 $ 0.55
Office 255 3.26 831 17 848 0.85
Industrial 255 1.16 296 6 302 0.30
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit (residential) or per 1,000 square feet (nonresidential).

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 4.3.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes average residential dw elling unit is 2,023 square feet based on building permit data from 2020 and 2021.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 20 5. Recreation Facilities
The following chapter documents the nexus analysis demonstrating the need for new recreation facilities needed to serve new development.

Service Population
Recreation facilities in Patterson primarily serve residents. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities is based on the City’s residential population. Table 5.1 shows the existing and future projected residential population.

Table 5.1: Recreation Facilities Service
Population
Residents
Existing (2023) 24,314
New Development (2023-Buildout) 42,359
Total (Buildout) 66,673
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Existing Recreation and Community Center Facilities
Inventory
The City of Patterson maintains several recreation and community center facilities. Table 5.2 summarizes the City’s existing recreation and community center facilities inventory. Note that the City’s property schedule, which lists building space and building replacement costs was the basis for the facilities shown in this inventory. Costs from that document have been increased to account for inflation, based on recent City cost estimates for an administrative building. The estimated cost per acre of land is based on an appraisal conducted for the City by the Hillas Appraisal Company in 2023. All facilities are located within the City limits. In total, the City owns approximately $17.8 million in recreation and community center facilities.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
21 Table 5.2: Existing Recreation Facilities
Facility Amount Units Unit Cost Value
Land
Community Center / Aquatic Center Complex 6.02 acres $ 65,000 $ 391,300 Buildings
Aquatic Center - Pool House 2,985 sq. ft. $ 813 $ 2,426,805 Aquatic Center - Shade Shelter 4,000 sq. ft. 284 1,136,000 Hammon Senior Center 9,465 sq. ft. 872 8,253,480
Relocatable Classroom 1 960 sq. ft. 67 64,320
Relocatable Classroom 2 960 sq. ft. 67 64,320
Portable Classroom 960 sq. ft. 146 140,160
Subtotal 19,330 sq. ft. $12,085,085
Special Use Facilities
Aquatic Center - Pool 5,046 sq. ft. 639 $ 3,224,394
Skate Park 14,000 sq. ft. 40 555,145
Skate Park Shade Sails 682 sq. ft. 111 75,927
Pergola Structure 224 sq. ft. 69 15,465
Subtotal 19,952 sq. ft. $ 3,870,931
Community Center Complex Solar Panels $ 1,436,882
Total $17,784,198
Sources: PEPIP-CA Property Schedule, February 21, 2022, City of Patterson; Willdan Financial Services.

Planned Recreation and Community Center Facilities
The City has planned several recreation and community center facilities to serve new development. Included in the plans are both expansions to existing facilities and the new construction of facilities. In total, the City has identified $54.1 million of recreation and community center facilities to serve new development. Table 5.3 details the City’s planned recreation and community center facilities.

Table 5.3: Planned Recreation Facilities
Quantity Units Unit Cost Cost
Pools 21,954 Sq. Ft. of Pools $ 639 $ 14,028,606
Community Centers 40,000 Sq. Ft. 872 34,880,000
Gymnasium1
6,000 Sq. Ft. 872 5,232,000
Total Cost - Planned Facilities $ 54,140,606
1 Assumes 2,000 square feet of gymnasium per court. Three indoor courts are needed, per the draft Master Plan.

Sources: City of Patterson, Draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan; Willdan Financial Services.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
22 Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 5.4 expresses the City’s current recreation facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita. This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 5.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City can fund the planned recreation facilities that have been identified in the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan.

Table 5.4: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 17,784,198
Existing Service Population 24,314
Facility Standard per Resident $ 731
Sources: Tables 5.1 and 5.2; Willdan Financial Services.

Future Level of Service
Table 5.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in recreation facilities at the planning horizon. This level of service drives the fee calculation. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon.

Table 5.5: Recreation Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 17,784,198
Cost of Planned Facilities 54,140,606
Total System Value (Buildout) $ 71,924,804
Future Service Population (Buildout) 66,673
Facility Standard per Resident $ 1,079
Sources: Tables 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3; Willdan Financial Services.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
23 Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use recreation facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, vehicles and equipment that are part of the system of recreation facilities serving new development. A list of planned facilities is included in Table 5.3.

Fee Revenue Projection
The City plans to use recreation facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of recreation and community center facilities that serves new development. The list of facilities to be funded by the fee is detailed above in Table 5.3. Table 5.6 details a projection of fee revenue, based on the service population growth increment identified in Table 5.1. The cost of the planned facilities not funded by fee revenue represents existing development’s share of the facilities and can be funded by any revenue source other than impact fees.

Table 5.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 1,079
Growth in Service Population (2023 - Buildout) 42,359
Fee Revenue $ 45,705,361
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 54,140,606
Non-Fee Revenue to Be Identified $ (8,435,245)
Sources: Tables 5.1, 5.3 and 5.4.

Fee Schedule
Table 5.7 shows the maximum justified recreation and community center facilities fee schedule.

The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit densities (persons per dwelling). The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the average square footage of dwelling units built within the past two years in Patterson.

The total fee includes a two-percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
24 Table 5.7: Maximum Justified Recreation Facilities Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.

Residential $ 1,079 3.46 $ 3,733 $ 75 $ 3,808 $ 1.88
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 5.4; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes average residential dw elling unit is 2,023 square feet based on building permit data from 2020 and 2021.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 25 6. Park Facilities
The purpose of the park facilities impact fee is to fund the parkland acquisition and park facilities needed to serve new development. The maximum justified impact fee is presented based on the existing standard of parkland and park facilities per capita.

Service Population
Park and recreation facilities in Patterson primarily serve residents. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities is based on the City’s residential population. Table 6.1 shows the existing and future projected residential population for park facilities.

Table 6.1: Park Facilities Service
Population
Residents
Census (2020) 23,781
Existing (2023) 24,314
Growth (2023 to Buildout) 42,359
Total (Buildout) 66,673
Source: US Census; Table 2.2.

Existing Parkland and Park Facilities Inventory
The City of Patterson maintains many parks throughout the city. Table 6.2 summarizes the City’s existing parkland inventory in 2023. All facilities are owned by the City. Parks are distinguished by the type of parkland (neighborhood or community parks), as described in the City’s Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2023. In addition to developed parkland the inventory includes undeveloped raw land and distinguishes the acreage accordingly. In total, the inventory includes a total of 101.24 acres of parkland.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
26 Table 6.2: Park Land Inventory
Name
Developed
Acres
Undeveloped
Acres Total
Community Parks
Centennial Park - 13.70 13.70
Sports Complex 12.00 9.30 21.30
Sports Complex Addition (Triangle) - 4.10 4.10
Subtotal 12.00 27.10 39.10
Neighborhood Parks
Amarylis Park - 0.83 0.83
Ambercot Park 4.07 - 4.07
Aprigold Park 3.89 - 3.89
Aurora Park 0.55 - 0.55
Autumn Royal Park 2.40 - 2.40
Blenheim Park 1.25 - 1.25
Blue Fiesta Park 0.50 - 0.50
Camas Lily Park 2.56 - 2.56
Castlebright Park 0.53 - 0.53
City Park 0.17 - 0.17
Del Puerto Park 0.31 - 0.31
Earlygold Park 1.26 - 1.26
El Pescadero Park 0.37 - 0.37
Floragold Park 4.26 - 4.26
Garza Park 5.54 - 5.54
Goldbar Park 3.80 - 3.80
Golden Amber Park 1.29 - 1.29
Meadow Rue Park 2.85 - 2.85
Mustang Clover Park 3.27 - 3.27
New Castle Park 2.08 - 2.08
Noble Park 0.57 - 0.57
North Park 0.98 - 0.98
Rosette Park 1.04 - 1.04
Sorenson Park 1.83 - 1.83
Sunflower Park 1.63 - 1.63
Sungiant Park 1.50 - 1.50
Sunglow Park 1.94 - 1.94
Tilton Park 3.50 - 3.50
Trigem Park 0.82 - 0.82
Valley Lupine Park 0.90 - 0.90
Veterans Memorial Park (South Park) 0.99 - 0.99
Wilding Park 2.47 - 2.47
Woodland Star Park 2.19 - 2.19
Subtotal 61.31 0.83 62.14
Total 73.31 27.93 101.24
Source: City of Patterson; City of Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2023.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
27 Parkland and Park Facility Standards
Park facility standards establish a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for expanded parkland and park facilities. The most common measure in calculating new development’s demand for parks is the ratio of park acres per resident. In general, facility standards may be based on the Mitigation Fee Act (using a city’s existing inventory of parkland and park improvements), or an adopted policy standard contained in a master facility plan or general plan. Facility standards may also be based on a land dedication standard established by the Quimby Act.
2 In this case, the City will use the Mitigation Fee Act to impose park impact fees for development not occurring in subdivisions and will use the Quimby Act for development occurring in subdivisions.

Mitigation Fee Act
The Mitigation Fee Act does not dictate use of a particular type or level of facility standard for public facilities fees. To comply with the findings required under the law, facility standards must not burden new development with any cost associated with facility deficiencies attributable to existing development.3 A simple and clearly defensible approach to calculating a facility standard is to use the City’s existing ratio of park acreage per 1,000 residents. Under this approach, new development is required to fund new parkland and park improvements at the same level as existing residents have provided those same types of facilities to date.

Quimby Act
The Quimby Act specifies that the dedication requirement must be a minimum of 3.0 acres and a maximum of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. In this case, the Quimby Act standard is set at 5.0 acres of parkland dedication per 1,000 residents, which is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan parkland dedication standards.

The Quimby Act only applies to land subdivisions. The Quimby Act would not apply to residential development on future approved projects on single parcels, such as apartment complexes and other multifamily development.

The Quimby Act allows payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication. The fee is calculated to fund acquisition of the same amount of land that would have been dedicated.

The Quimby Act allows use of in-lieu fee revenue for any park or recreation facility purpose.

Allowable uses of this revenue include land acquisition, park improvements including recreation facilities, and rehabilitation of existing park and recreation facilities.

City of Patterson Parkland and Park Facilities Standards Table 6.3 shows the existing standard for park acreage per 1,000 residents and documents the City’s standard as of the last Census for the Quimby Act standard. The table also shows the current standard for improved park acreage. The standard used to calculate the Quimby fee inlieu of land acquisition is 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The existing standard used to calculate the Mitigation Fee Act fee for land acquisition is 4.16 acres per 1,000 residents. The park improvements component is calculated to maintain the existing level of park improvements at the existing improved parkland standard.
2 California Government Code §66477.
3 See the Benefit and Burden findings in Background Report.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
28 Table 6.3: Park Standards
Existing
Standard
(2023)
Quimby
Act
Standard
Land Standard
Total Parkland 101.24
Service Population 24,314
Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 4.16 5.00
Park Improvements Standard
Acres of Improvements 73.31
Service Population 24,314
Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 3.02
Sources: Tables 6.1 and 6.2.

Parkland and Park Facilities Unit Costs
Table 6.4 displays the unit costs necessary to develop parkland in Patterson. The assumed cost of standard park improvements per acre is based on a recent cost estimate received by the City for Villages at Patterson Park. The estimated cost per acre of land is based on an appraisal conducted for the City by the Hillas Appraisal Company in 2023 and is consistent with other land assumptions used in this analysis. In total, this analysis assumes that it costs $442,000 to acquire and improve an acre of parkland in Patterson.

Table 6.4: Park Facilities Unit Costs
Cost
per Acre
Standard Park Improvements1$ 377,000
Land Acquisition 65,000
Total Cost per Acre $ 442,000
Sources: City of Patterson; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Standard park improvement costs based on cost estimate for the Villages at Patterson Park. Includes site preparation, basic furnishings and amenities, curbs, fences, playground, landscaping and irrigation costs. Excludes land acquisition costs.

Facilities Needed to Accommodate New Development
Table 6.5 shows the costs needed to accommodate new development at the Quimby Act and Mitigation Fee Act standards for land dedication and acquisition, respectively. To achieve these standards by the planning horizon, depending on the amount of development subject to the Quimby Act, new development must fund the acquisition of between 176.21 and 211.80 parkland acres.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
29 The facility standards and resulting fees under the Quimby Act are higher because development will be charged to provide 5.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, whereas development not subject to the Quimby Act will be charged to provide only 4.16 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Since the exact amount of development that will be subject to the Quimby fees is unknown at this time, Table 6.5 presents the range of total land acquisition costs that may be incurred depending on the amount of development subject to the Quimby Act.

Table 6.5: Parkland to Accommodate New Development
Calculation Parkland Total Range1
Parkland (Quimby Act) 2
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 5.00
Growth in Service Population (2023 to Buildout) B 42,359 Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 211.80
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 65,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $13,767,000 $ 13,767,000 Parkland Mitigation Fee Act 3
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 4.16
Growth in Service Population (2023 to Buildout) B 42,359 Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 176.21
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 65,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $11,453,650 $ 11,453,650 Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4.
1 Values in this column show the range of the cost of parkland acquisition and development should all development be either subject to the Quimby Act, or to the Mitigation Fee Act, respectively. 2 Cost of parkland to serve new development show n if all development is subject to the Quimby Act (Subdivisions of 50 units or more). Parkland charged at Quimby Act standard. 3 Cost of parkland to serve new development show n if all development is subject to the Mitigation Fee Act. Parkland charged at the existing standard.

Table 6.6 shows the costs needed to accommodate new development at the existing Mitigation Fee Act standard for park improvements. To achieve this standard by the planning horizon new development must fund the improvement of 127.92 acres of park improvements.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
30 Table 6.6: Park Improvements to Accommodate New Development Calculation
Park
Improvements
Community Park Improvements - Mitigation Fee Act
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 3.02
Growth in Service Population (2023 to Buildout) B 42,359 Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 127.92
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 377,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $ 48,225,840
Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4.

Parks Cost per Capita
Table 6.7 shows the cost per capita of providing new parkland and park facilities at the existing facility standard, and at the Quimby standard. The cost per capita is shown separately for land and improvements. The cost per capita is shown separately for land and improvements. The costs per capita in this table will serve as the basis of three fees:
• A Quimby Act Fee in-lieu of land dedication. This fee is payable by residential development occurring in subdivisions.
• A Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition. This fee is payable by residential development not occurring in subdivisions.
• A Mitigation Fee Act Fee for parkland improvements. This fee is payable by all residential development.

A development project pays either the Quimby Act Fee in-lieu of land dedication, or the Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition, not both. All development projects pay the Mitigation Fee Act Fee for park improvements. In this case, the Quimby Act Fee in-lieu of land dedication and the Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition are the exact same amount.

Table 6.7: Cost per Capita - Existing Level of Service
Calculation Quimby Fee OR Impact Fee AND Impact Fee
Cost per Acre A $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 377,000
Level of Service Standard1
B 5.00 4.16 3.02
Total Cost per 1,000 capita C = A x B $ 325,000 $ 270,400 $ 1,138,540 Cost per Resident D = C / 1,000 $ 325 $ 270 $ 1,139
1 Acres per 1,000 residents.

Sources: Tables 6.3 and 6.4.

Land Improvements

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
31 Use of Fee Revenue
The City plans to use parkland and park facilities fee revenue to purchase parkland or construct improvements to add to the system of park facilities that serves new development. The City may only use impact fee revenue to provide facilities and intensify usage of existing facilities needed to serve new development.

Fee Schedule
To calculate fees by land use type, the cost in park facilities is determined on a per resident basis for both land acquisition and improvement. These cost factors (shown in Table 6.7) are investment per capita based on the unit cost estimates and facility standards.

Table 6.8 shows the park land acquisition fee based on either the Quimby Act, or Mitigation Fee Act standard. The City would collect the fee based on only one of the two approaches as appropriate. Each fee includes a component for park improvements which is based maintaining the existing standard park improvements. The costs per capita from Table 6.7 are converted into a fee per average sized dwelling unit using the residential occupancy density assumption from Table 2.2. The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per average sized dwelling unit by the average square footage of dwelling units built recently in Patterson.

The total fee includes an administrative charge to fund costs that include: (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

Table 6.8: Park Facilities Fee Schedule
Cost Per Base Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Subdivisions
Parkland (Quimby Act) $ 325 3.46 $ 1,125 $ 23 $ 1,148 $ 0.57 Improvements 1,139 3.46 3,941 79 4,020 1.99
Total $ 1,464 $ 5,066 $ 5,168 $ 2.55
Non-Subdivisions
Parkland (Mitigation Fee Act) $ 270 3.46 $ 934 $ 19 $ 953 $ 0.47 Improvements 1,139 3.46 3,941 79 4,020 1.99
Total $ 1,409 $ 4,875 $ 4,973 $ 2.46
Sources: Tables 2.2 and 6.7.
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes average residential dw elling unit is 2,023 square feet based on building permit data from 2020 and 2021.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 32 7. AB 602 Requirements
On January 1, 2022, new requirements went into effect for California jurisdictions implementing impact fees. Among other changes, AB 602 added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code, which set guidelines for impact fee nexus studies. Four key requirements from that section which concern the nexus study are reproduced here:
66016.5. (a) (2) When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
66016.5. (a) (4) If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.
66016.5. (a) (5) A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development. A local agency that imposes a fee proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units of the development shall be deemed to have used a valid method to establish a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. 66016.5. (a) (6) Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.

Compliance with AB 602
The following sections describe this study’s compliance with the new requirements of AB 602. 66016.5. (a) (2) - Level of Service

1. For fees calculated under the existing standard methodology, the fees are calculated such that new development funds facilities at the existing level of service. These fee categories are: city hall facilities, corporation yard facilities and parks. The existing level service in terms of the existing facility investment per capita is shown in each corresponding chapter.

2. For the fees calculated under the system standard methodology, the maximum justified fees represent an increase in the facility level of service. The fees calculated under this methodology are recreation facility fees. The increased level of service is required to fund new development’s fair share of facilities identified in the City of Patterson, Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2023. New development will not fund the entirety of the increase in level of service, rather, it will fund a share of the increased level of service represented by the planned facilities. The City will have to fund existing development’s share of the increase level of service through any other funding source. The recreation facilities chapter includes a table that shows the existing level of service and future level of service in terms of facility investment per capita.
66016.5. (a) (4) – Review of Original Fee Assumptions
Table 7.1 summarizes the key assumptions from the 2005/06 study as listed in that document.

Note that the General Plan was updated since the prior impact fee study, which has affected the assumptions used in this study regarding growth and the allocation of facilities costs.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
33 Table 7.1: Summary of Review of 2005/06 Study
Remaining Dwelling Units to be Constructed: 5,940
Remaining Nonresidential Square Feet: 10,221,245
Allocation of Future Facility Costs between New and
Existing Development:
57% New
43% Existing
Cost per Acre of Unimproved Land: $ 266,000
Source: City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Justification Study, 2005/06 Update. 66016.5. (a) (5) – Residential Fees per Square Foot
Impact fees for residential land uses are calculated per square foot and comply with AB 602. 66016.5. (a) (6) – Capital Improvement Plan
The Capital Improvement Plan for this nexus study is comprised of the identified planned facilities identified in the recreation facilities chapter. In addition to those facilities, which drive the calculation of the recreation facilities fees, the City is planning for the amounts of facilities within the city hall, corporation yard and parks facilities categories displayed in Table 7.2. Note that the City will refine this CIP annually during its budgeting and facility planning processes.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
34 Table 7.2: Capital Improvement Plan
Project Name
Approximate
Quantity Units Description Approximate Location
Total
Estimated
Cost Anticipated Funding Sources
Estimated
Project
Timeframe
City Hall Facilities 1
City Hall Expansion 2,960 Sq. Ft. Office space in Public Safety Center 1 Plaza $ 1,480,000 City Hall DIF, General Fund 2024 to 2030 City Hall Expansion 29,909 Sq. Ft. Additional administrative office space Citywide 14,954,387 City Hall DIF, General Fund Beyond 2030 Land Acquisition 0.64 Acres Land Acquisition for City Hall Expansion Citywide 41,600 City Hall DIF, General Fund Beyond 2030 Subtotal $16,475,987
Corporation Yard Facilities 2
Corp Yard Building 1 4,800 Sq. Ft. New operations bay 16215 S. Baldwin $ 811,200 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds 2024 to 2030 Public Works Garage 4,500 Sq. Ft. Expanded Public Works Garage 16215 S. Baldwin 891,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds 2024 to 2030 Corp Yard Building 2 1,500 Sq. Ft. New office space at 4th street corporation yard 420 S. 4th 268,500 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds 2024 to 2030 Collections Div. Building 5,000 Sq. Ft. New operations bay 14901 Poplar 910,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds 2024 to 2030 Large Equipment N/A Large operations equipment (trucks, machinery, equipment) 16215 S. Baldwin 3,703,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds 2024 to 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 6,720 Sq. Ft. New Operations Bay 16215 S. Baldwin 1,135,680 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 6,720 Sq. Ft. Public Works Admin/Staffing 16215 S. Baldwin 3,360,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 10,000 Sq. Ft. Public Works Admin/Staffing Orange Ave 5,000,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Renewable Energy Project N/A Solar Project Orange Ave 712,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 16,250 Sq. Ft. New operations bay Orange Ave 2,957,500 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Land Purchase 12.41 Land for corporation yard Citywide 807,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 11,000 Sq. Ft. New operations bay Citywide 2,002,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 9,000 Sq. Ft. Public Works Garage (Mechanic Bays) Citywide 1,782,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 6,700 Sq. Ft. Equipment storage Orange Ave 1,326,600 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Corporation Yard Buildings 5,000 Sq. Ft. Equipment storage Orange Ave/14901Popular 990,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Large Equipment N/A Large operations equipment (trucks, machinery, equipment) 16215 S. Baldwin 14,874,000 Corp Yard DIF, Enterprise Funds Beyond 2030 Subtotal $41,530,480
Parks 1
VOP Soccer Complex N/A 40 Acre Soccer Complex (Design phase) Olive Ave $ 1,000,000 Park DIF, Quimby Fees, General Fund 2024 to 2030 VOP Soccer Complex 40 Acres Soccer Complex (Construction Phase) Olive Ave 15,080,000 Park DIF, Quimby Fees, General Fund 2024 to 2030 Additional Parks 136.21 Acres New Park Acquisition and Construction Citywide 60,204,820 Park DIF, Quimby Fees/Dedication Beyond 2030 Subtotal $76,284,820
Recreation Facilities 2
Community Center N/A Centennial Park Community Center (Design phase) Ward Ave $ 2,000,000 Recreation Facilities DIF, General Fund 2024 to 2030 Community Centers 40,000 Sq. Ft. Ward Ave / Citywide 34,880,000 Recreation Facilities DIF, General Fund Beyond 2030 Pools 21,954 Sq. Ft. Citywide 14,028,606 Recreation Facilities DIF, General Fund Beyond 2030 Gymnasium 6,000 Sq. Ft. Citywide 5,232,000 Recreation Facilities DIF, General Fund Beyond 2030 $56,140,606 Source: City of Patterson. 1
City Hall, Corporation Yard and Park facilities impact fees w ere calculated using the existing facility standard approach. Accordingly, impact fee revenue collected under this approach can be spent on any capacity expanding facilities project that benefits new development. This CIP documents the City's approximate facility needs at this time. This CIP w ill be revised annually as the City refines its capital plans and cost estimates. The cost of facilities identified in this document exceeds projected fee revenue. The City w ill have to fund existing development's share of future facilities w ith funding sources other than impact fees. 2 Recreation facilities impact fees w ere calculated using the system standard approach. The cost of facilities identified in this document exceeds projected fee revenue. The City w ill have to fund existing development's share of future facilities w ith funding sources other than impact fees.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance 35 8. Implementation
Impact Fee Program Adoption Process
Impact fee program adoption procedures are found in the California Government Code section 66016. Adoption of an impact fee program requires the City Council to follow certain procedures including holding a public hearing. Data, such as an impact fee report, must be made available at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. The City’s legal counsel should be consulted for any other procedural requirements as well as advice regarding adoption of an enabling ordinance and/or a resolution. After adoption there is a mandatory 60-day waiting period before the fees go into effect.

Inflation Adjustment
The City can keep its impact fee program up to date by periodically adjusting the fees for inflation.

Such adjustments should be completed regularly to ensure that new development will fully fund its share of needed facilities. We recommend that the California Construction Cost Index (https://www.dgs.ca.gov/RESD/Resources/Page-Content/Real-Estate-Services-DivisionResources-List-Folder/DGS-California-Construction-Cost-Index-CCCI) be used for adjusting fees for inflation. The California Construction Cost Index is based on data from the Engineering News Record and is aggregated and made available for free by the State of California.

The fee amounts can be adjusted based on the change in the index compared to the index in the base year of this study (2023).

While fee updates using inflation indices are appropriate for periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, the City will also need to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available. Note that decreases in index value will result in decreases to fee amounts.

Reporting Requirements
The City will comply with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. For facilities to be funded by a combination of public fees and other revenues, identification of the source and amount of these non-fee revenues is essential. Identification of the timing of receipt of other revenues to fund the facilities is also important.

Table 8.1 summarizes the annual and five-year reporting requirements identified in the Mitigation Fee Act.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study
36 Table 8.1: Mitigation Fee Act - Annual and Five-year Administrative Requirements CA Gov't Code
Section Timing Reporting Requirements1
Recommended
Fee Adjustment
66001.(d)
The fifth fiscal year following the
first deposit into the account or
fund, and every five years
thereafter
(A) Identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put. (B) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and thepurpose for which it is charged.
(C) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated tocomplete financing in incomplete improvements.
(D) Designate the approximate dates on which supplemental funding is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.

Comprehensive
Update
66006. (b) Within 180 days after the last
day of each fiscal year
(A) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund. (B) The amount of the fee.
(C) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund. (D) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned. (E) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended including share funded by fees.
(F) (i) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement and the public improvement remains incomplete.
(ii) An identification of each public improvement identified in a previous report pursuant to clause (i) and whether construction began on the approximate date noted in the previous report.
(iii) For a project identified pursuant to clause (ii) for which construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, the reason for the delay and a revised approximate date that the local agency will commence construction.
(G) A description of any potential interfund transfers. (H) The amount of refunds made (if any).

Inflationary
Adjustment
1 Edited for brevity. Refer to the government code for full description.

Sources: California Government Code §66001 and §66006.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study
37 Programming Revenues and Projects with the CIP
The City maintains a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to plan for future infrastructure needs.

The CIP identifies costs and phasing for specific capital projects. The use of the CIP in this manner documents a reasonable relationship between new development and the use of those revenues.

The City may decide to alter the scope of the planned projects or to substitute new projects if those new projects continue to represent an expansion of the City’s facilities and provide benefit to new development. If the total cost of facilities varies from the total cost used as a basis for the fees, the City should consider revising the fees accordingly.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- 38 9. Mitigation Fee Act Findings
Public facilities fees are one-time fees typically paid when a building permit is issued and imposed on development projects by local agencies responsible for regulating land use (cities and counties). To guide the widespread imposition of public facilities fees the State Legislature adopted the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act) with Assembly Bill 1600 in 1987 and subsequent amendments. The Act, contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025, establishes requirements on local agencies for the imposition and administration of fee programs.

The Act requires local agencies to document five findings when adopting a fee.

The five statutory findings required for adoption of the public facilities fees documented in this report are presented in this chapter and supported in detail by the preceding chapters. All statutory references are to the Act.

Purpose of Fee
 Identify the purpose of the fee (§66001(a)(1) of the Act).

Development impact fees are designed to ensure that new development will not burden the existing service population with the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The purpose of the fees proposed by this report is to provide a funding source from new development for capital improvements to serve that development. The fees advance a legitimate City interest by enabling the City to provide public facilities needed to serve new development.

Use of Fee Revenues
 Identify the use to which the fees will be put. If the use is financing facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in §65403 or §66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the facilities for which the fees are charged (§66001(a)(2) of the Act).

Fees proposed in this report, if enacted by the City, would be used to fund expanded facilities to serve new development. Facilities funded by these fees are designated to be located within the City limits. Fees addressed in this report have been identified by the City to be restricted to funding the following facility categories: recreation facilities, city hall facilities, parks, and corporation yard facilities.

Benefit Relationship
 Determine the reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the type of development project on which the fees are imposed (§66001(a)(3) of the Act).

The City will restrict fee revenue to the acquisition of land, construction of facilities and buildings, and purchase of related equipment, furnishings, vehicles, and services used to serve new development. Facilities funded by the fees are expected to provide a citywide network of facilities accessible to the additional residents and workers associated with new development. Under the Act, fees are not intended to fund planned facilities needed to correct existing deficiencies. Thus, a reasonable relationship can be shown between the use of fee revenue and the new development residential and non-residential use classifications that will pay the fees.

Burden Relationship
 Determine the reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of development on which the fees are imposed (§66001(a)(4) of the Act).

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
39 Facilities need is based on a facility standard that represents the demand generated by new development for those facilities. For each facility category, demand is measured by a single facility standard that can be applied across land use types to ensure a reasonable relationship to the type of development. For city hall facilities and corporation yard facilities, service population standards are calculated based upon the number of residents associated with residential development and the number of workers associated with non-residential development. To calculate a single, per capita standard, one worker is weighted less than one resident based on an analysis of the relative use demand between residential and non-residential development. For recreation facilities and parks, the service population standards are calculated using the City’s residential service population.

The standards used to identify growth needs are also used to determine if planned facilities will partially serve the existing service population by correcting existing deficiencies. This approach ensures that new development will only be responsible for its fair share of planned facilities, and that the fees will not unfairly burden new development with the cost of facilities associated with serving the existing service population.

Chapter 2, Growth Forecasts provides a description of how service population and growth forecasts are calculated. Facility standards are described in the Facility Standards sections of each facility category chapter.

Proportionality
 Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees amount and the cost of the facilities or portion of the facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed (§66001(b) of the Act).

The reasonable relationship between each facilities fee for a specific new development project and the cost of the facilities attributable to that project is based on the estimated new development growth the project will accommodate. Fees for a specific project are based on the project’s size. Larger new development projects can result in a higher service population resulting in higher fee revenue than smaller projects in the same land use classification. Thus, the fees ensure a reasonable relationship between a specific new development project and the cost of the facilities attributable to that project.

See Chapter 2, Growth Forecasts, or the Service Population sections in each facility category chapter for a description of how service populations are determined for different types of land uses. See the Fee Schedule section of each facility category chapter for a presentation of the proposed impact fees.

9.3.c
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Patterson Development Impact Fee Update Study - Revised - 11-12-24 Exhibit A (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks- City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
4 Use of Fee Revenues
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that this analysis “Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged.” 1 Each chapter in this report identifies the appropriate use of impact fee revenues for each impact fee category.

Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary
Table E.1 summarizes the development impact fees that meet the City’s identified needs and comply with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

Table E.1: Development Impact Facilities Fee Summary
Land Use City Hall
Corporate
Yard
Recreation
Facilities
Parks -
Subdivisions1
Parks - Non
Subdivisions2
Total -
Subdivisions
Total - Non
Subdivisions
All Fees Charged per Square Foot
Residential $ 0.57 $ 1.43 $ 1.88 $ 2.47 $ 2.46 $ 6.35 $ 6.34 Nonresidential
Commercial $ 0.22 $ 0.55 $ - $ - $ - $ 0.77 $ 0.77
Office 0.34 0.85 - - - 1.19 1.19
Industrial 0.12 0.30 - - - 0.42 0.42
1 Subdivisions pay Quimby Fee in Lieu of land dedication, plus Mitigation Fee Act fee for park improvements. See Table 6.8 for more detail.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) 5 Table E.1: Development Impact Facilities Fee Summary
Land Use City Hall
Corporate
Yard
Recreation
Facilities
Parks -
Subdivisions1
Parks - Non
Subdivisions2
Total -
Subdivisions
Total - Non
Subdivisions
All Fees Charged per Square Foot
Residential $ 0.57 $ 1.43 $ 1.88 $ 2.55 $ 2.46 $ 6.43 $ 6.34 Nonresidential
Commercial $ 0.22 $ 0.55 $ - $ - $ - $ 0.77 $ 0.77
Office 0.34 0.85 - - - 1.19 1.19
Industrial 0.12 0.30 - - - 0.42 0.42
1 Subdivisions pay Quimby Fee in Lieu of land dedication, plus Mitigation Fee Act fee for park improvements. See Table 6.8 for more detail.

Sources: Tables 3.5, 4.5, 5.6, and 6.8.
2 Infill developments pay Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition, plus Mitigation Fee Act fee for park improvements. See Table 6.8 for more detail.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) 26 6. Park Facilities
The purpose of the park facilities impact fee is to fund the parkland acquisition and park facilities needed to serve new development. The maximum justified impact fee is presented based on the existing standard of parkland and park facilities per capita.

Table 6.1: Park Facilities Service
Population
Residents
Census (2020) 23,781
Existing (2023) 24,314
Growth (2023 to Buildout) 42,359
Total (Buildout) 66,673
Source: US Census; Table 2.2.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
27 Table 6.2: Park Land Inventory
Name
Developed
Acres
Undeveloped
Acres Total
Community Parks
Centennial Park - 13.70 13.70
Sports Complex 12.00 9.30 21.30
Sports Complex Addition (Triangle) - 4.10 4.10
Subtotal 12.00 27.10 39.10
Neighborhood Parks
Amarylis Park - 0.83 0.83
Ambercot Park 4.07 - 4.07
Aprigold Park 3.89 - 3.89
Aurora Park 0.55 - 0.55
Autumn Royal Park 2.40 - 2.40
Blenheim Park 1.25 - 1.25
Blue Fiesta Park 0.50 - 0.50
Camas Lily Park 2.56 - 2.56
Castlebright Park 0.53 - 0.53
City Park 0.17 - 0.17
Del Puerto Park 0.31 - 0.31
Earlygold Park 1.26 - 1.26
El Pescadero Park 0.37 - 0.37
Floragold Park 4.26 - 4.26
Garza Park 5.54 - 5.54
Goldbar Park 3.80 - 3.80
Golden Amber Park 1.29 - 1.29
Meadow Rue Park 2.85 - 2.85
Mustang Clover Park 3.27 - 3.27
New Castle Park 2.08 - 2.08
Noble Park 0.57 - 0.57
North Park 0.98 - 0.98
Rosette Park 1.04 - 1.04
Sorenson Park 1.83 - 1.83
Sunflower Park 1.63 - 1.63
Sungiant Park 1.50 - 1.50
Sunglow Park 1.94 - 1.94
Tilton Park 3.50 - 3.50
Trigem Park 0.82 - 0.82
Valley Lupine Park 0.90 - 0.90
Veterans Memorial Park (South Park) 0.99 - 0.99
Wilding Park 2.47 - 2.47
Woodland Star Park 2.19 - 2.19
Subtotal 61.31 0.83 62.14
Total 73.31 27.93 101.24
Source: City of Patterson; City of Patterson Parks and Recreation Master Plan, 2023.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
28 Parkland and Park Facility Standards
Park facility standards establish a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for expanded parkland and park facilities. The most common measure in calculating new development’s demand for parks is the ratio of park acres per resident. In general, facility standards may be based on the Mitigation Fee Act (using a city’s existing inventory of parkland and park improvements), or an adopted policy standard contained in a master facility plan or general plan. Facility standards may also be based on a land dedication standard established by the Quimby Act.
2 In this case, the City will use the Mitigation Fee Act to impose park impact fees for development not occurring in subdivisions and will use the Quimby Act for development occurring in subdivisions.

Quimby Act
The Quimby Act specifies that the dedication requirement must be a minimum of 3.0 acres and a maximum of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. A jurisdiction can require residential developers to dedicate above the three-acre minimum if the jurisdiction’s existing park standard as of the last Federal Census justifies the higher level (up to five acres per 1,000 residents). The standard used must also conform to the jurisdiction’s adopted general or specific planIn this case, the Quimby Act standard is set at 5.0 acres of parkland dedication per 1,000 residents, which is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Parks and Recreation Master Plan parkland dedication standards.

The Quimby Act allows payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication. The fee is calculated to fund acquisition of the same amount of land that would have been dedicated.

The Quimby Act allows use of in-lieu fee revenue for any park or recreation facility purpose.

Allowable uses of this revenue include land acquisition, park improvements including recreation facilities, and rehabilitation of existing park and recreation facilities.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
29 lieu of land acquisition is 4.265.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The existing standard used to calculate the Mitigation Fee Act fee for land acquisition is 4.16 acres per 1,000 residents. The park improvements component is calculated to maintain the existing level of park improvements at the existing improved parkland standard.

Table 6.3: Park Standards
Existing
Standard
(2023)
Quimby
Act
Standard
(2020)
Land Standard
Total Parkland 101.24 101.24
Service Population 24,314 23,781
Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 4.16 4.26
Park Improvements Standard
Acres of Improvements 73.31
Service Population 24,314
Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 3.02
Sources: Tables 6.1 and 6.2.

Existing
Standard
(2023)
Quimby
Act
Standard
Land Standard
Total Parkland 101.24
Service Population 24,314
Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 4.16 5.00
Park Improvements Standard
Acres of Improvements 73.31
Service Population 24,314
Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 3.02
Sources: Tables 6.1 and 6.2.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
30 Table 6.4: Park Facilities Unit Costs
Cost
per Acre
Standard Park Improvements1$ 377,000
Land Acquisition 65,000
Total Cost per Acre $ 442,000
Sources: City of Patterson; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Standard park improvement costs based on cost estimate for the Villages at Patterson Park. Includes site preparation, basic furnishings and amenities, curbs, fences, playground, landscaping and irrigation costs. Excludes land acquisition costs.

The facility standards and resulting fees under the Quimby Act are higher because development will be charged to provide 4.265.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, whereas development not subject to the Quimby Act will be charged to provide only 4.16 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Since the exact amount of development that will be subject to the Quimby fees is unknown at this time, Table 6.5 presents the range of total land acquisition costs that may be incurred depending on the amount of development subject to the Quimby Act.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
31 Table 6.5: Parkland to Accommodate New Development
Calculation Parkland Total Range1
Parkland (Quimby Act) 2
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 4.26
Growth in Service Population (2023 to 2050) B 42,359
Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 180.45
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 65,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $11,729,250 $ 11,729,250 Parkland Mitigation Fee Act 3
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 4.16
Growth in Service Population (2023 to 2050) B 42,359
Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 176.21
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 65,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $11,453,650 $ 11,453,650 Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4.
1 Values in this column show the range of the cost of parkland acquisition and development should all development be either subject to the Quimby Act, or to the Mitigation Fee Act, respectively. 2 Cost of parkland to serve new development show n if all development is subject to the Quimby Act (Subdivisions of 50 units or more). Parkland charged at Quimby Act standard. 3 Cost of parkland to serve new development show n if all development is subject to the Mitigation Fee Act. Parkland charged at the existing standard.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
32 Calculation Parkland Total Range1
Parkland (Quimby Act) 2
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 5.00
Growth in Service Population (2023 to Buildout) B 42,359 Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 211.80
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 65,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $13,767,000 $ 13,767,000 Parkland Mitigation Fee Act 3
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 4.16
Growth in Service Population (2023 to Buildout) B 42,359 Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 176.21
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 65,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $11,453,650 $ 11,453,650 Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4.
1 Values in this column show the range of the cost of parkland acquisition and development should all development be either subject to the Quimby Act, or to the Mitigation Fee Act, respectively. 2 Cost of parkland to serve new development show n if all development is subject to the Quimby Act (Subdivisions of 50 units or more). Parkland charged at Quimby Act standard. 3 Cost of parkland to serve new development show n if all development is subject to the Mitigation Fee Act. Parkland charged at the existing standard.

Table 6.6: Park Improvements to Accommodate New Development Calculation
Park
Improvements
Community Park Improvements - Mitigation Fee Act
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 capita) A 3.02
Growth in Service Population (2023 to Buildout) B 42,359 Facility Needs (acres) C = A x B/1000 127.92
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 377,000
Total Cost of Facilities E = C x D $ 48,225,840
Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
33 Parks Cost per Capita
Table 6.7 shows the cost per capita of providing new parkland and park facilities at the existing facility standard, and at the Quimby standard. The cost per capita is shown separately for land and improvements. The cost per capita is shown separately for land and improvements. The costs per capita in this table will serve as the basis of three fees:
• A Quimby Act Fee in-lieu of land dedication. This fee is payable by residential development occurring in subdivisions.
• A Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition. This fee is payable by residential development not occurring in subdivisions.
• A Mitigation Fee Act Fee for parkland improvements. This fee is payable by all residential development.

Table 6.7: Cost per Capita - Existing Level of Service
Calculation Quimby Fee OR Impact Fee AND Impact Fee
Cost per Acre A $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 377,000
Level of Service Standard1
B 4.26 4.16 3.02
Total Cost per 1,000 capita C = A x B $ 276,900 $ 270,400 $ 1,138,540 Cost per Resident D = C / 1,000 $ 277 $ 270 $ 1,139
1 Acres per 1,000 residents.

Sources: Tables 6.3 and 6.4.

Land Improvements
Calculation Quimby Fee OR Impact Fee AND Impact Fee
Cost per Acre A $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 377,000
Level of Service Standard1
B 5.00 4.16 3.02
Total Cost per 1,000 capita C = A x B $ 325,000 $ 270,400 $ 1,138,540 Cost per Resident D = C / 1,000 $ 325 $ 270 $ 1,139
1 Acres per 1,000 residents.

Sources: Tables 6.3 and 6.4.

Land Improvements
Use of Fee Revenue
The City plans to use parkland and park facilities fee revenue to purchase parkland or construct improvements to add to the system of park facilities that serves new development. The City may

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
34 only use impact fee revenue to provide facilities and intensify usage of existing facilities needed to serve new development.

Table 6.8: Park Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Base Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Subdivisions
Parkland (Quimby Act) $ 277 3.46 $ 958 $ 19 $ 977 $ 0.48 Improvements 1,139 3.46 3,941 79 4,020 1.99
Total $ 1,416 $ 4,899 $ 4,997 $ 2.47
Non-Subdivisions
Parkland (Mitigation Fee Act) $ 270 3.46 $ 934 $ 19 $ 953 $ 0.47 Improvements 1,139 3.46 3,941 79 4,020 1.99
Total $ 1,409 $ 4,875 $ 4,973 $ 2.46
Sources: Tables 2.2 and 6.7.
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes average residential dw elling unit is 2,023 square feet based on building permit data from 2020 and 2021.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City of Patterson Development Impact Fee Study Update
35 Cost Per Base Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Subdivisions
Parkland (Quimby Act) $ 325 3.46 $ 1,125 $ 23 $ 1,148 $ 0.57 Improvements 1,139 3.46 3,941 79 4,020 1.99
Total $ 1,464 $ 5,066 $ 5,168 $ 2.55
Non-Subdivisions
Parkland (Mitigation Fee Act) $ 270 3.46 $ 934 $ 19 $ 953 $ 0.47 Improvements 1,139 3.46 3,941 79 4,020 1.99
Total $ 1,409 $ 4,875 $ 4,973 $ 2.46
Sources: Tables 2.2 and 6.7.
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit. 2
Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses. 3
Assumes average residential dw elling unit is 2,023 square feet based on building permit data from 2020 and 2021.

9.3.d
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Willdan Study - Park Section Revisions (Attachment 3) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

PARKS, RECREATION &

CULTURAL RESOURCES

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

REATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-2

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-3
Introduction
Parks, recreation, and cultural resources are essential components of any community. Just as a community must plan for its commercial and residential land uses, it must also plan for its parks and recreation facilities. Parks provide amenities such as active and passive recreation areas, a visual contrast to the surrounding developed environment, and areas for relaxation and enjoyment for all age groups. Without adequate outdoor space that is both attractive and useful for relaxation and recreational purposes, the ability to cope with the stress of daily living can be compromised. In addition, studies have shown that a community's economy is strengthened if it contains high-quality parks and recreation.

Access to such spaces is vital for every segment of Patterson’s population.

Besides providing amenities for the enjoyment of the local citizenry, parks improve a community’s image, which translates into increased revenues from tourism and an improved business climate.

Goals and Policies
Park and Recreation Facilities
Goal PR-1 To establish and maintain a public park system and recreation facilities suited to the needs of
Patterson residents and visitors.

Policies
PR-1.1 Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan.

The City shall prepare and adopt a Parks and Recreation Facilities Master Plan which includes the following
components:
a. Locational standards;
b. Preferred sites;
c. Improvement and equipment standards;
d. Development priorities;
e. Financing mechanisms; and
f. Development of community activity centers
g. Sports facilities.
h. Joint use facilities
PR-1.2 Parks standard. The City shall establish a minimum standard of five acres of developed parkland (combined
pocket, neighborhood, and community) per 1,000 residents.

This symbol denotes a
policy that contributes to
sustainability and/or
sustainable practices.

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

REATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-4
PR-1.3 Requirements for development. New development
shall be required to assist in meeting the City’s standard of five acres per 1,000 residents. To this end, the City shall require all new development to dedicate land, dedicate
improvements, pay in-lieu fees, or a combination of these determined acceptable by the City, to the maximum extent authorized by law.

PR-1.4 Grant funding. The City shall pursue all available and appropriate county, state, federal and private funding for the acquisition of parkland and the development of park
facilities.

PR-1.5 Neighborhood parks. Neighborhood parks shall be
integrated into, and become focal points of, new residential neighborhoods. Pedestrian accessibility to these parks shall be emphasized.

PR-1.6 Large-scale park complexes. The City shall
continue to promote the development of large-scale park complexes in Patterson (may be classified as community or regional parks).

PR-1.7 Joint-use. The City shall pursue and maintain
agreements for joint-use of school facilities as a high priority for the development of new park and recreational facilities, especially for after-school activities.

PR-1.8 Safety. Parks shall be located, oriented, and designed in such a way as to facilitate security, policing, and
maintenance.

PR-1.9 Nuisance. High-activity-level parks and parks intended for night use shall be designed to buffer existing and
planned surrounding residential uses from excessive noise, light, and other potential nuisances.

PR-1.10 Use of existing open space. The City shall
identify appropriate open spaces, including areas within the downtown and its western extension and along Salado
Creek and Del Puerto Creek, for development of safe
community activity areas.

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-5
PR-1.11 Design for droughts. The City shall emphasize the use of drought-tolerant, drought-resistant and low use
irrigation landscaping in the development of City parks.

PR-1.12 Rehabilitation of existing parks. The City shall assign high priority to the improvement and rehabilitation of parks in existing neighborhoods.

PR-1.13 Open spaces as buffers. The City shall
encourage the use of open space and recreational uses as buffers between incompatible land uses.

PR-1.14 Pedestrian/bicycle network. The City shall
pursue the development of a citywide network of pedestrian and bicycle pathways to integrate with existing and future regional, community, neighborhood, and, to the extent
possible, pocket parks. (See the Circulation Element for more policies).

Private Recreation Facilities
Goal PR-2 To promote the provision of private
recreational facilities and opportunities.

Policies
PR-2.1 Private facilities. The City shall promote the provision of private open space and recreation facilities in large-scale residential developments.

PR-2.2 Employee recreation. The City shall promote the
inclusion of private outdoor and indoor recreation facilities in large commercial/industrial projects as a benefit for employees and as a means of reducing demand on public
facilities.

PR-2.3 Golf courses. The City may encourage the development of golf courses in conjunction with major new development projects.

PR-2.4 Commercial recreational facilities. The City shall promote the development of commercial recreational

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

REATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-6
facilities that meet community needs and complement
public parks, facilities, and programs.

Recreation Programs
Goal PR-3 To promote the provision of communitycentered recreation programs.

Policies
PR-3.1 Recreation program. The City shall develop and
maintain a balanced recreation program which addresses
the diverse needs of the various age and interest groups in Patterson.

PR-3.2 Full inclusion. The City shall provide for full inclusion in programs at City facilities for people of diverse cultures, backgrounds, ages, gender, interests, languages, lifestyles, abilities, and socioeconomic status.

PR-3.3 Residents first. The City shall ensure that residents of Patterson are given first priority for participation in Citysponsored recreation programs, activities, and leagues and use of City facilities for such activities.

PR-3.4 Neighborhood focus. The City shall consider unique neighborhood needs in developing facilities and programs for indoor and outdoor activities.

PR-3.5 Joint-use for programs. The City shall establish cooperative agreements with the Patterson Unified School District for the use of school facilities for City-sponsored recreation programs (in conjunction with Policy PR-1.7, above).

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-7
Historic Resources
Goal PR-4 To preserve and enhance Patterson’s
historical heritage.

Policies
PR-4.1 Protection of significant structures. The City shall set as a high priority the protection and enhancement of Patterson’s historically and architecturally significant buildings.

PR-4.2 Historic district. The City shall maintain a historic district in the downtown area and along East Las Palmas Avenue
and develop standards for the preservation and
rehabilitation of historic structures and compatible infill development. New development near designated historic
landmark structures and sites shall be designed to be
compatible with the character of the designated historic resource.

PR-4.3 Registration of historic structures. The City shall work with property owners in seeking registration of
historical structures and sites as State Historic Landmarks or listing on the National Register of Historic Sites.

PR-4.4 Support for private historic preservation. The City shall support the efforts of property owners to preserve and renovate historic and architecturally significant structures.

Where such buildings cannot be preserved intact, the City shall seek to preserve the building facades.

PR-4.5 Demolition. The City shall consider demolition of historic resources as a last resort, to be permitted only if the following findings are made: rehabilitation and/or relocation are not feasible; the demolition of the resource is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public; or the public benefits of demolition outweigh the cost of preserving the resource. In all instances, the City shall gather and report input from the public prior to preparing a recommendation (for or against demolition) to decision-makers.

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

REATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-8
PR-4.6 Agricultural heritage museum. The City shall
explore the possibility of establishing a living history center or museum to focus on Patterson’s agricultural heritage.

PR-4.7 Patterson Historical Society. The City shall support the efforts of the Patterson Township Historical Society to keep the Center Building Historical Museum open and
accessible to the public.

Native American Heritage
Goal PR-5 To protect Patterson’s Native American
heritage.

Policies
PR-5.1 Review of development. The City shall refer
development proposals that may adversely affect
archaeological sites to the California Archaeological
Inventory, Central California Information Center, at
California State University, Stanislaus, for review and comment.

PR-5.2 Native American consultation requirements.

The City shall continue to comply with the requirements Government Code Sections 65352.3 and 65352.4 which
require the City to consult with Native American tribes with respect to the possible preservation of, or the mitigation of impacts to, specified Native American places, features, and objects.

PR-5.3 Mandatory avoidance of impacts. The City shall
not knowingly approve any public or private project that may adversely affect an archaeological site without first
consulting with applicable State and local agencies and organizations, conducting a site evaluation as may be
indicated, and mitigating any adverse impacts according to the recommendations of a qualified archaeologist. City
implementation of this policy shall be guided by Appendix K of the State CEQA Guidelines.

PR-5.4 Protection of Native American cultural sites. The City shall ensure the protection of archaeological sites that may be culturally significant to Native Americans, even if

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

PARKS, RECREATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-9
they have lost their scientific or archaeological integrity through previous disturbance; sites that may have religious value, even though no artifacts are present; and sites that contain artifacts which may have intrinsic value, even
though their archaeological context has been disturbed.

Archeological Resources
Goal PR-6 To protect the area’s archaeological resources.

PR-6.1 Protection of archaeological resources. The City shall provide for the protection of both known and potential archaeological resources. To avoid significant damage to important archaeological sites, all available measures, including purchase of the property in fee or easement, shall be explored at the time of a development proposal. Where such measures are not feasible and development would
adversely affect identified archaeological or paleontological resources, mitigation shall be required in accordance with the relevant provisions of federal and State laws.

PR-6.2 Archaeologically sensitive areas. Development
within an archaeologically sensitive area shall require a preliminary site survey by a qualified archaeologist
knowledgeable in Native American cultures, prior to a
determination of the potential environmental impacts of the project.

PR-6.3 Archaeological resources present. Where a
preliminary site survey finds substantial archaeological resources, before permitting construction, the City shall require a mitigation plan to protect the resources. Possible mitigation measures include:
o Requiring the presence of a qualified professional
during initial grading or trenching; project redesign;
o Covering with a layer of fill; excavation, removal and curation in an appropriate facility under the direction of a qualified professional.

PR-6.4 Qualified archaeologist present. Where substantial archaeological resources are discovered during
construction or grading activities, all such activities in the

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

REATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-10
immediate area of the find shall cease until a qualified archaeologist knowledgeable in Native American cultures can determine the significance of the resource and
recommend alternative mitigation measures.

PR-6.5 Archaeological site records. The City shall establish and maintain archaeological site records about known sites.

Specific archaeological site information shall be kept
confidential to protect the resources. The City shall
maintain, for public use, generalized maps showing known areas of archaeological sensitivity. 9.3.e
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-11
Implementation Measures
No. Implementation Measure Policies/
Goals Responsibility
Timeframe
Near
Term
MidTermLongTermOngoin
g
PR-1
The City shall maintain and
update a Park and Recreation
Facility Master Plan that
establishes goals, policies, and
standards for the location, size,
and level of development of all
existing and proposed parks.

PR-1.1
PR-1.2
PR-1.3
City Council
City Manager
Parks and
Recreation
Dept.

Community
Development
Dept.

Public Works
Dept.
¢
PR-2
The City shall regularly monitor
county, state, and federal
programs for funding of parkland
acquisition, development, and
rehabilitation. The City shall
actively pursue funding for which it
is qualified.

PR-1.4
Community
Development
Dept.

Parks and
Recreation
Dept.
¢
PR-3
The City shall prepare, adopt, and
periodically update a long-term
Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) that includes parks and
recreational facilities.

All
City Council
City Manager
Community
Development
Dept.

Public Works
Dept.

Finance Dept.
¢
PR-4
The City shall maintain the jointuse agreement with the Patterson Unified School District that
provides use of school facilities for
certain City-sponsored recreation
programs.

PR-1.7
City Manager
Parks and
Recreation
Dept.
¢
PR-5
The City shall investigate the
purchase and rehabilitation of the
historic Del Puerto Theater for use
as a community theater and
performing arts center.

PR-1.1 City Manager ¢
PR-6
The City shall pursue the
development of a citywide
network of pedestrian and bicycle
pathways to integrate with existing
and future regional, community,
and neighborhood parks through
the following:
 Implement recommendations in
the 2001 Bicycle Transportation
PR-1.14
City Council
City Manager
Parks and
Recreation
Dept.

Community
Development
Dept.

Public Works
¢

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance)

PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL RESOURCES
CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-12
Implementation Measures
No. Implementation Measure Policies/
Goals Responsibility
Timeframe
Near
Term
MidTermLongTermOngoin
g
Master Plan; and
 Update the Plan by 2010.

Dept.

PR-7
The City shall work with the
Patterson Unified School District
to develop and maintain a
balanced recreation program
which provides full inclusion for
the interest groups represented in
Patterson.

PR-3.5
City Council
City Manager
Community
Development
Dept.
¢
PR-8
The City shall impose the
following conditions on all
discretionary projects which may
cause ground disturbance:
“The Planning Department shall
be notified immediately if any
prehistoric, archaeological, or
fossil artifact or resource is
uncovered during construction. All
construction must stop and an
archaeologist that meets the
Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications
Standards in prehistoric or
historical archaeology shall be
retained to evaluate the finds and
recommend appropriate action.”
“All construction must stop if any
human remains are uncovered,
and the County Coroner must be
notified according to Section
7050.5 of California’s Health and
Safety Code. If the remains are
determined to be NativeAmerican,
the procedures outlined in CEQA
Section 15064.5 (d) and (e) shall
be followed.”
PR-5.2
PR-5.3
Near-Term = Within 5 Years
Mid-Term = Within 10 Years
Long-Term = 10 Years and Beyond

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) CITY of PATTERSON ~ General Plan
PR-13

9.3.e
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Parkland Recreation GP Chapter (Attachment 4) (Ordinance Amending Chapter 16.44 Parks-Quimby Ordinance) City Council Agenda Report
TO: Mayor Clauzel and Members of the City Council
FROM: Fernando Ulloa, Interim City Manager
BY: Nubia Goldstein, City Attorney
MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
ITEM NO: 10.1
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help Enterprises and to accept the Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project.

RECOMMENDATION
Motion to Adopt Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help Enterprises and to accept the Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project.

BACKGROUND & ANALYSIS
The Stonegate Shire Project consists of three (3) phases and a total of two hundred fifty-six (256) dwelling units, located within the Villages of Patterson Master Development Plan (“VOP Development Plan”). Self-Help Enterprises (“Self-Help”) has previously obtained subdivision and design review approvals for Phases 1 and 2 of the Stonegate Shire Project. Phase 1 involved 41 new single-family dwelling units, and Phase 2 involved 138 new multi-family units. The Stonegate Shire units carry out the affordable housing obligations of the VOP Development Plan and the Villages Development Agreement. The units developed will be restricted to qualifying households.

Phase 3 will involve development of 77 lots in the southwestern quadrant of the VOP Development Plan. This Resolution would approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project, creating 77 new lots in the Self-Help development area.

10.1 Packet Pg. 542
Divisions of land are subject to the requirements and procedures of the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s subdivision ordinance relating to the filing, approval, and recordation of subdivision maps (the “Subdivision Laws”). The City approved the Tentative Map for Stonegate Shire Project in 2006 in conjunction with other entitlements relating to the VOP Development Plan.

Pursuant to project’s conditions of approval, Self-Help is required to install certain public improvements to support development of the subdivision, including but not limited to: streets, alleys, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drain systems, sidewalks, bike paths, and other rightsof-way for public use (the “Improvements”).

Under the Subdivision Laws, Self-Help must either install the Improvements prior to the City’s acceptance and recording of the Final Map, or alternatively, execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement allows a Self-Help to install public improvements after approval and recordation of a final map and also establishes the security device to guarantee completion of the Improvements. Self-Help is entering into the attached Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City to guarantee completion of the necessary Improvements and to record the Phase 3 Final Map for the Stonegate Shire Project.

The Subdivision Improvement Agreement establishes Self-Help’s Improvement obligations and ensures completion of the Improvements. Adoption of this Resolution approves the attached Subdivision Improvement Agreement, accepts the Phase 3 Final Map for the Stonegate Shire Project, and would allow Self-Help to proceed with construction of the Improvements.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no budget impact to the City. This action will pave the way for construction of new residential units and related public improvements for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project.

ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
The City Council’s options regarding the Resolution include:

1. Adopt Resolution No. 2024-64;

2. Continue the item to a later meeting of the City Council and provide direction to staff for any changes; or

3. Reject Resolution No. 2024-64.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2024-64
Exhibit A: Subdivision Improvement Agreement

10.1 Packet Pg. 543
{CW143376.2}
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-64

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON

APPROVING THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
ACCEPTING THE FINAL MAP FOR THE STONEGATE SHIRE PHASE 3

SUBDIVISION LOCATED IN THE VILLAGES OF PATTERSON

MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, Self-Help Enterprises, a non-profit benefit corporation (“Developer”) owns tracts of land consisting of approximately 12.30 gross acres in the City of Patterson (“City”), which is part of the “Stonegate Shire Project” located within the Villages of Patterson Master Development Plan (“VOP Development Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Stonegate Shire Project includes three (3) phases creating a total of approximately two hundred fifty-six (256) new dwelling units; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2006, City adopted Resolution 2006-112, which approved a number of entitlements relating to the VOP Development Plan, including but not limited to, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Maps “A” and “B” (collectively, the “Tentative Map”); and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2006, City adopted Ordinance No. 681, which approved a Development Agreement that applies to properties within the VOP Development Plan. On October 15, 2018, the City approved an Operating Memorandum memorializing certain revisions to facilitate and update the 2006 Development Agreement (collectively, the “Development Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Developer has filed a Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project with City for acceptance and recording, which would create 77 residential lots; and WHEREAS, in order for City to accept and record the Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project, Developer must execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement to guarantee completion of the Improvements; and
WHEREAS, under the attached Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Developer is required to provide securities to guarantee construction of the Improvements, and to guarantee payment for materials, work, labor, and warranty of the work; and WHEREAS, City Staff has determined that the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and the Final Map conforms to the Tentative Map, the Subdivision Map Act, the City’s subdivision ordinance, the Development Agreement, and the VOP Development Plan; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this Resolution is to authorize the execution of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and to authorize the acceptance and recording of the Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-64 Stonegate Shire Phase 3 - SIA Final Maps (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision {CW143376.2}
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Patterson City Council hereby approves the attached Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the Developer, authorizes the City Manager to execute and perform all acts pursuant to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, approves the acceptance and recording of the Final Map for Phase 3 of the Stonegate Shire Project, and further authorizes the City Manager to perform all acts necessary and incidental to carry out the purposes of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PATTERSON ON THE _____TH DAY OF __________________ 20____, BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE:

AYES:

NOES:

EXCUSED:

APPROVE:

Michael Clauzel
Mayor of the City of Patterson
ATTEST:

Aracely Alegre
City Clerk of the City of Patterson
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, correct, and true copy of a resolution passed by the City Council of the City of Patterson, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of November 2024, and I further certify that said resolution is in full force and effect and has never been rescinded or modified.

DATE:
__________________________
City Clerk of the City of Patterson

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-64 Stonegate Shire Phase 3 - SIA Final Maps (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision {CW143376.2}

EXHIBIT A

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT

VILLAGES OF PATTERSON
STONEGATE SHIRE – PHASE 3

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-64 Stonegate Shire Phase 3 - SIA Final Maps (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision {CW143350.4}
APNs: 047-061-043, 047-059-013, 047-059-010

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
City of Patterson
NAME OF PROJECT: STONEGATE SHIRE – PHASE 3
(referred to as the “Project”)
NAME OF SUBDIVIDER: SELF-HELP ENTERPRISES,
a California non-profit public benefit corporation
(referred to as “Subdivider”)
PARCEL OR TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL(S): THE VILLAGES OF PATTERSON VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAPS
– “A” and “B” MAPS
IMPROVEMENT PLANS: __________________________________
(referred to as “Improvement Plans”)
ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS: $3,365,198.90

COMPLETION PERIOD
FORM OF SECURITY:

TWELVE (12) MONTHS
[X] Surety bond
[ ] Letter of Credit
[ ] Cash deposit
[ ] Other
NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (if applicable):
_________________________________
(Name of Corporate Entity)
_________________________________
_________________________________
SURETY BOND NUMBERS (if applicable): __________________________________

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City of Patterson
280 N. Third Avenue
Patterson, CA 95361
Attn: City Clerk
Exempt from recording fees
(Gov. Code §§ 6103 and 27383)
(Space above this line for Recorder’s use)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
This Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by CITY OF PATTERSON, a California municipality (the “City”), and SELF-HELP ENTERPRISES, a California non-profit public benefit corporation (“Subdivider”). City and Subdivider may individually be referred to herein as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.” There are no other parties to this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. Subdivider owns a tract of land consisting of approximately 30.5 gross acres, lying in the City of Patterson, County of Stanislaus, California, known as the “Stonegate Shire” project, to be built in three (3) phases. This Agreement pertains to Phase 3 of Stonegate Shire (approximately 12.30 acres), as further described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Subdivision” or the “Property”).

B. On December 12, 2006, Patterson City Council (“City Council”) adopted Resolution 2006-122, approving a number of entitlements related to the Villages of Patterson (“VOP”) Development Plan, which encompasses the Subdivision, including, but not limited to:
(1) the VOP Development Plan; (2) Vesting Tentative Subdivision “A” and “B” Maps (together, the “Tentative Map”); (3) the VOP Conditions of Approval; and (4) an environmental impact report, statement of overriding considerations and mitigation monitoring plan in accordance with CEQA for the VOP Development Plan.

C. On December 19, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 681, approving a Development Agreement by and between the City of Patterson and Northeast Territories, LP and Relating to the Development known as “The Villages of Patterson” at Patterson, California (the “Development Agreement”), as amended by that certain Operating Memorandum (dated October 15, 2018, and recorded on December 17, 2018 as Document No. 2018-0086098-00 in the official records of Stanislaus County).

D. The Tentative Map is subject to the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code § 66410 et seq.), City’s ordinances and regulations related to the filing, approval, and recordation of subdivision maps, the VOP Conditions of Approval, and other relevant conditions contained in Resolution 2006-122 (and any amendments thereto) (together, the “Subdivision Laws”). The Tentative Map is also subject to the terms, conditions and obligations contained in the Development Agreement, and development within the Subdivision must be in accordance with the VOP Development Plan.

E. Pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Laws, Subdivider has presented to City a proposed final map for the Subdivision (“Final Map”) for approval and recordation, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

F. In order for City to approve and record a Final Map for the Subdivision, the Subdivider must either complete all of the improvements required for the Project by the Subdivision Laws, the Development Agreement, VOP Development Plan and Tentative Map (“Improvements”), or execute an agreement with City to complete the Improvements within a specified period.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
G. Complete improvement plans for the construction, installation, and completion of certain public improvements, including, but not limited to, improvements in streets, alleys, water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drain systems, sidewalks, bike paths, easements and other rights-ofway have been prepared by Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer or his designee (“Improvement Plans”).

H. The Parties desire to enter into this Agreement in order to facilitate completion of all Improvements required for the Project (“Improvements”).

I. The Improvements shall conform to the Subdivision Laws, and all applicable City standards and policies related to the Improvements (collectively, the “Improvement Standards”).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and benefits that accrue to each, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
Section 1. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective on the date that all of the following have occurred: (i) City approves Improvement Plans provided by Subdivider; (ii) Subdivider provides securities to City to guarantee completion of the Improvements; and (iii) both Subdivider and City have executed this Agreement (the “Effective Date”).

Section 2. Term. This Agreement shall terminate after (i) City records a Certificate of Completion for the Improvements, and (ii) City releases the securities required for the Improvements. Any provisions in this Agreement that are intended to survive such termination, by their express terms or nature of the obligation, shall survive such termination.

Section 3. Estimated Cost of Improvements. The total estimated cost of the Improvements, as provided by Subdivider and reviewed and confirmed by City, is attached hereto as Exhibit C (“Cost Estimate”).

Section 4. Dedication. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement or in the action of the City Council approving the Final Map, City hereby rejects all lands, rights-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the Final Map or by separate instrument. Such offers, however, shall remain open and constitute irrevocable offers of dedication in accordance with Government Code § 66477.2.

Section 5. Subdivider Obligations. Subdivider shall perform each of the following obligations throughout the term of this Agreement, as conditions precedent to City’s issuance of a building permit for any lot within the Subdivision:

A. Construct and install at Subdivider’s own expense all the Improvements, as shown on the Improvement Plans. The Improvement Plans may only be modified by Subdivider subject to prior written approval by City.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
B. Commence construction of the Improvements within six (6) months from the Effective Date. Subdivider shall notify City in writing three (3) days before the commencement of construction of the Improvements.

C. Complete all Improvements within twelve (12) months from the Effective Date, unless otherwise approved or extended in writing by City, after written application by Subdivider. Such written request for extension shall state in reasonable detail the grounds for such extension. In granting any extension of time, City may require new Securities to reflect increases in the costs of constructing the Improvements or any other conditions related to the extension of time.

D. Furnish and pay for all necessary equipment, labor and materials to complete the Improvements in conformity with the Improvement Standards.

E. Replace or repair all public improvements, private property, public utility facilities, and surveying or subdivision monuments that are destroyed or damaged in the performance of the work. Subdivider shall bear the entire cost of any such replacements or repairs.

Any repair or replacement work shall be to the satisfaction of City.

F. Provide safe access for inspection of the Improvements by City.

G. Give good and adequate warning to the public of each and every dangerous condition existing on or near the Improvements, and take reasonable action to protect the public from any such dangerous condition.

H. Perform all construction work for the Improvements between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays (Monday through Friday), and between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekends and legal holidays, unless otherwise approved in writing by City.

I. Require each contractor and subcontractor to have a competent foreman on the job at all times when that contractor or subcontractor, or any employee or agent thereof, is performing any work for the Improvements. Subdivider or its contractor shall maintain an office with a telephone on the Property or provide a 24-hour contact number for an authorized Project representative. While construction work is being performed on the Improvements, Subdivider or an agent of Subdivider shall be available at the Property within three (3) hours of being called by City.

J. Assume all costs for utility and cable television undergrounding or relocation which is not the responsibility of the cable television, gas, electric, telephone or other utility company under the terms of any franchises with City or otherwise imposed upon the utility companies by law.

K. Obtain and comply with all necessary permits and licenses for the construction and installation of the Improvements, give all necessary notices, and pay all fees and taxes required by law.

Section 6. Inspections. All Improvements shall be constructed under the inspection of City employees or contractors (collectively “City Inspectors”). Upon completion of the Improvements,

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
Subdivider may request a final inspection by City Inspectors. City shall not record the Certificate of Completion unless Subdivider has completed all work in accordance with the Improvement Plans and Improvement Standards. If City Inspectors determine that the Improvements have been completed in accordance with the Improvement Plans and Improvement Standards, certification of the completion of the Improvements shall be presented to the City Council, to accept or reject in its sole discretion, and City shall thereafter record a Certificate of Completion for the Improvements. City Inspectors shall have the right to inspect the Improvements for a period of twelve (12) months after the Certificate of Completion has been recorded. Subdivider shall bear all costs of inspection, including but not limited to the costs of all third-party inspectors used for the Project.

Section 7. Title to Improvements. City shall not accept any property to be dedicated, or title to the Improvements, unless they are constructed in conformity with the Improvement Plans and Improvement Standards to the satisfaction of City. Subdivider shall retain title to, shall be responsible for, and shall bear the risk of loss to, any of the Improvements constructed or installed, until such time that City accepts the Improvements. Title to and ownership of the Improvements and any real property to be dedicated shall vest absolutely in City upon completion and acceptance of such Improvements. The Improvements shall be entirely free from all liens prior to City’s acceptance. Prior to acceptance, at City’s request, Subdivider shall supply City with appropriate lien releases, at no cost to and in a form acceptable to City.

Section 8. Acceptance of Improvements. The Improvements shall be deemed accepted only after: (A) acceptance by the City Council upon recommendation of the City Engineer, after satisfactory completion and inspection of all Improvements, and (B) issuance of a Certificate of Completion by the City Engineer. Such acceptance shall not constitute a waiver by City of any defects or deficiencies in the Improvements.

Section 9. Damage to Improvements. Subdivider is solely responsible for the care and maintenance of, and any damage to, the Improvements, prior to final acceptance by City.

Subdivider shall replace or repair all Improvements, utility facilities, and monuments that are damaged or destroyed for any reason, regardless of the cause of damage or the ownership of the underlying property. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction of City.

Section 10. Acquisition and Dedication of Easements or Rights-of-Way. If any of the Improvements are to be constructed or installed on land not within the Subdivision or an already existing public right-of-way, no construction or installation shall commence before:

A. The irrevocable offer of dedication or conveyance to City by Subdivider of appropriate rights-of-way, easements or other interests in real property, as determined by City; or B. Authorization from the affected property owner to allow construction or installation of the Improvements; or
C. The issuance of an order of possession by a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to the State Eminent Domain Law (Code Civ. Proc., § 1230.010 et seq.). Subdivider shall comply in all respects with any such order of possession.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
Section 11. Repair of Defective Work After Acceptance of Improvements. If, within a period of one (1) year after final acceptance of the Improvements, any portion of the Improvements or any work done under this Agreement fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this Agreement or conform to the Improvement Plans or Improvement Standards, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to City, repair, replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part of the Improvements. If Subdivider fails to act promptly in accordance with this requirement, or if the exigencies of the situation require repairs or replacements to be made before Subdivider can be notified or correct the situation, then City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work. In such event, City shall first call on the Warranty Security (as defined herein) to pay the costs of the work. Subdivider shall remain responsible for the actual cost of the work performed by City plus fifteen percent (15%), excluding the amount received by City under the Warranty Security.

Section 12. Securities.

A. Types of Security. Subdivider shall secure completion of the Improvements by providing the following securities (collectively, the “Securities”):
i. Performance Security. A performance security that is one hundred percent (100%) of the total Cost Estimate, securing the Subdivider’s faithful performance and completion of the Improvements (“Performance Security”). ii. Payment Security. An additional amount that is one hundred percent (100%) of the total Cost Estimate, securing Subdivider’s payment to any contractor, subcontractor, person renting or supplying equipment, or furnishing labor and materials for the Improvements (“Payment Security”).
iii. Warranty. An additional amount of ten percent (10%) of the total Cost Estimate, for the guarantee and warranty of the Improvements against any defective work or labor done, or defective materials, for a period of one (1) year following their completion and acceptance by City (“Warranty Security”). Upon Subdivider’s reasonable request, the Warranty Security may be posted after the Final Map is accepted but immediately prior to all public improvements being deemed complete and accepted by City.

B. Conditions of Security.
i. Bonds. Any bonds submitted as the Securities shall be executed by a surety company authorized to conduct a surety business in California and shall be in a form as specified by the Subdivision Laws.
ii. Irrevocable. All Securities deposited as bonds under this Agreement shall be irrevocable, shall not be limited as to time (except as to the guarantee and warranty period), and shall provide that they may be released, in whole or part, only upon the written approval of City, as provided under the Subdivision Laws and subdivision C below. All Securities shall expressly obligate the surety for any extension of time authorized by City for Subdivider’s

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
completion of the Improvements, whether or not the surety is given notice of such an extension by City.
iii. Replacement. If Subdivider seeks to replace any of the Securities, such replacement security shall: (1) comply with all requirements of this Agreement; (2) be provided by Subdivider to City; and (3) upon written acceptance by City, be deemed to be a part of this Agreement. Upon City’s acceptance of a replacement security, the earlier provided Security may be released.

C. Release of Securities. The Securities required by this Agreement shall be released in accordance with the Subdivision Laws and the following provisions:
i. Performance Security. City shall release the Performance Security after recording a Certificate of Completion for all the Improvements, or as may otherwise be authorized in accordance with the Subdivision Laws.
ii. Payment Security. The Payment Security may, six (6) months after the Certificate of Completion is recorded by City, be reduced to an amount equal to the amount of all claims filed related to the Improvements and for which notice has been given to City. The balance of the Payment Security shall be released upon the settlement of all claims and obligations for which the Payment Security was given.
iii. Warranty. The Securities provided for guarantee and warranty of workmanship shall be released after one (1) year following recordation of a Certificate of Completion for the Improvements. If, however, City determines there are defects in the Improvements that require correction pursuant to Section 11 above, and Subdivider fails to correct such defects within a reasonable time, City may utilize the Securities to make all necessary corrections, including payment of reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees in connection with enforcement of any provision of this Agreement.

D. Records. Evidence of the Securities required by this Agreement shall be kept on file with City.

Section 13. Default of Subdivider.

A. Breach. Subdivider shall be deemed to have materially breached this Agreement based on, but not limited to, any of the following occurrences: (i) failure to timely complete construction of the Improvements; (ii) failure to timely cure any defect in the Improvements to the satisfaction of City; (iii) failure to timely deposit additional Securities as may be required by this Agreement; (iv) Subdivider’s insolvency, appointment of a receiver, or the filing of any petition in bankruptcy either voluntary or involuntary which Subdivider fails to discharge within thirty (30) days; (v) the commencement of a foreclosure action against the Project or a portion thereof, or any conveyance in-lieu or in avoidance of foreclosure; or (vi) failure to perform any other material obligation under this Agreement, as determined by the Engineer.

B. Notice of Breach; Default. In the event of any material breach of this Agreement, City shall serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider’s surety, if any,

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
informing Subdivider and its surety of the breach. Subdivider shall have twenty (20) days from receipt of written notice by City to cure any breach. If the breach is not cured, or significant progress towards curing the breach is not made, Subdivider shall be considered in default.

C. Remedies; Performance by City.
i. In the event of Subdivider’s default under this Agreement, and the twenty (20)-day cure period has expired without such default having been cured, Subdivider authorizes City to complete all work on the Improvements at the sole expense of Subdivider, and Subdivider authorizes City to utilize the Securities to complete all work on the Improvements and to pay all labor costs of contractors, subcontractors and workers related to the Improvements. In the event of a default by Subdivider, City may (a) take over and complete the Improvements, by contract or by any other method chosen by City, at the expense of Subdivider, (b) Subdivider shall be liable to City for any excess cost or damages incurred by City, including but not limited to costs of suit and attorney’s fees, and (c) City may take possession of, and utilize such materials, appliances, equipment, plant and other property belonging to Subdivider as may be necessary for completion of the Improvements.
ii. Failure of Subdivider to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall constitute consent to the filing by City of a notice of violation against all lots within the Project, or to rescind the approval or otherwise revert the Project to acreage. iii. The failure of City to take an enforcement action with respect to a default or breach, or to declare a default or breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or breach or any subsequent default or breach of Subdivider. iv. In addition to the remedies described in this Section, City reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for breach of Subdivider’s obligations under this Agreement. The right of City to draw upon or utilize the Securities is additional to and not inlieu of any other remedy available to City. Subdivider agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for Subdivider’s default shall be at the discretion of City.

D. Lien. In accordance with the Subdivision Laws (Gov. Code, § 66499), the recordation of this Agreement creates a lien attached to the Property underlying the Project and has the priority of a judgment lien in the amount necessary to complete the Improvements.

Section 14. Other Agreements for Improvements. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude City from entering into agreements with Subdivider or other parties for the apportionment of costs of water or sewer mains, or other improvements, pursuant to the provisions of City ordinances providing therefore, nor shall anything in this Agreement commit City to any such apportionment.

Section 15. Indemnity.

A. No Liability. City elected and appointed councils, commissions, officers, agents, employees and representatives (“City Agents”) shall not be liable or responsible for any

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
accident, loss or damage relating to the Improvements prior to completion of the Improvements.

All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby expressly assumed by Subdivider.

B. Indemnity/Hold Harmless. City and City Agents shall not be liable, and Subdivider agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend City and City Agents from any and all liability for claims of damage which may arise as a result of any negligent acts or omissions by Subdivider or its agents, contractors, or employeesin connection with the construction or operation of the Improvements. This indemnification and agreement to hold harmless shall extend to (i) injuries to persons and property, (ii) the taking of property resulting from the design or construction of the Project and the Improvements, (iii) the release or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances in the vicinity of the Property and the Improvements to be dedicated, and (iv) injuries to adjacent property owners as a consequence of the construction of the Project and the Improvements.

Acceptance by City of the Improvements shall not constitute an assumption by City of any responsibility for any damage covered by this Section.

C. Indemnity of Project Approval. Subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless City and City Agents from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul, any approval by City concerning the Project. Subdivider shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by Subdivider. City shall not be liable for approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or for approving, reviewing or inspecting any Improvements.

D. Design Defects. After acceptance of the Improvements, the Subdivider shall remain obligated to eliminate any defect in design or dangerous condition caused by a latent design or construction defect. Provisions of this paragraph shall remain in full force and effect for ten (10) years following acceptance by City of the Improvements. It is the intent of this Section that Subdivider shall be responsible for all liability for design and construction of the Improvements pursuant to this Agreement and that City shall not be liable for any negligence, nonfeasance, misfeasance, or malfeasance in approving, reviewing, checking, or correcting any plans or specifications or in approving, reviewing, or inspecting the Improvements.

Section 16. Insurance. Prior to commencing work on the Improvements, Subdivider shall present to City proof of insurance for the following policies, in a form acceptable to City.

A. Commercial General Liability. No less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) per occurrence and an aggregate limit of not less than Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000.00). Such insurance shall also:
i. Name City and City Agents as insured by endorsement with respect to performance of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitation on the scope of its protection afforded to City and City Agents.
ii. Be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs covering City and City Agents.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
B. Automotive Liability Insurance. No less than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) for each occurrence. Such insurance shall also:
i. Name City and City Agents as insured by endorsement with respect to performance of this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitation on the scope of its protection afforded to City and City Agents.
ii. Be primary with respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs covering City and City Agents; and
iii. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability Insurance.

Subdivider and its subcontractors shall, to the extent required by California law, maintain workers’ compensation insurance and, to the extent applicable, Employer’s Liability Insurance. The Employer’s Liability Insurance shall be no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.

Section 17. Administration. The department director primarily responsible for the Project shall interpret and administer this Agreement on behalf of City (“Director”). Any decision by the Director may be appealed to the City Manager. Should a disagreement arise between the Parties with respect to the City Manager’s interpretation or administration of any provision of this Agreement, such decision may be appealed to the City Council within fifteen (15) days of the City Manager's decision.

Section 18. Notices. Any notice or communication required hereunder between City and Subdivider must be in writing, and may be given either personally, by registered or certified mail, or by Federal Express, UPS or other similar couriers providing overnight delivery, or by email (provided that in the event of a notice of default, such email shall be promptly followed by delivery of such notice by another method as provided herein). If personally delivered, a notice shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed. If given by registered or certified mail, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been received on the first to occur of (a) actual receipt by any of the addressees specified below, or (b) three (3) days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, is deposited in the United States mail. If given by Federal Express or similar courier, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been received on the date delivered as shown on a receipt issued by the courier. If given by email, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been received based on the date delivered as shown on the sent email. Any Party hereto may at any time, by giving ten (10) days written notice to the other Party hereto, designate any other address to which such notice or communication shall be given. Notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below:

If to City: City of Patterson
1 Plaza Cir.

Patterson, CA 95363
Attn: City Manager
Email: [email protected]
with copy to: White Brenner LLP

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
1608 T Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
Attn: Nubia I. Goldstein
Email: [email protected]
If to Subdivider: Self-Help Enterprises
8445 W. Elowin Ct.

Visalia, CA 93291
Email: [email protected]
with copy to: Gubb & Barshay
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1110
San Francisco, CA 94104
Attn: Patrick Sukeforth
Email: [email protected]
Section 19. General Provisions:

A. Recitals. The recitals above (“Recitals”) are true and correct and are hereby incorporated into and made part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistency between the Recitals and the Sections contained in this Agreement, the Sections shall prevail.

B. Governing Law; Venue. The validity, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed pursuant to the laws of the State of California.

Venue for any legal proceedings initiated in connection with this Agreement shall be in the Superior Court for Stanislaus County.

C. Compliance with Laws. Subdivider, its agents, employees, contractors, and subcontractors shall comply with all federal, state and local laws in the performance of the work required by this Agreement, including but not limited to all Subdivision Laws, Improvement Standards, and all federal, state and local labor laws. Subdivider shall, at its expense, be responsible for obtaining all applicable licenses and permits.

D. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, or if any provision of this Agreement is rendered invalid or unenforceable according to the terms of any federal or state statute, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect and shall be construed to give effect to the intent of this Agreement.

E. Waiver. The waiver by either Party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No Party shall be deemed to have made any such waiver unless it is in writing and signed by the Party so waiving.

F. Integration. It is the intention of the Parties that this Agreement shall supersede any prior agreements, discussions, commitments, representations or agreements, written, electronic or oral, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
G. Mandatory and Permissive. “Shall” and “will” and “agrees” are mandatory. “May” or “can” are permissive.

H. No Agency Relationship. Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider’s agents, contractors, or employees are or shall be considered to be agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider’s obligations under this Agreement.

I. Assignment. Subdivider shall not assign any of its obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of City. City shall not release any Security given to secure the performance of any Improvements not assigned.

J. Covenant Running With the Land. All representations, covenants and warranties specifically set forth in this Agreement, by or on behalf of or for the benefit of any or all of the Parties, shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of such Party, its successors and assigns.

K. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously and in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

L. Further Acts. Parties agree that they shall cooperate in good faith to accomplish the objectives of this Agreement and to that end, agree to execute and deliver such other instruments or documents as may be necessary and convenient to fulfill the purposes and intentions of this Agreement.

M. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence in this Agreement in each covenant and term and condition herein.

N. Authority. Each Party executing this Agreement certifies, in their individual or corporate capacity that (i) they have legal or equitable title to the applicable parcels subject to this Agreement; (ii) they are authorized to enter into this Agreement, and (iii) they have complied with all requirements under state or federal law for such person or entity to execute this Agreement.

O. Construction and Interpretation. It is agreed and acknowledged by Subdivider that the provisions of this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation, and that Subdivider has had a full and fair opportunity to review this Agreement and to have such provisions reviewed by legal counsel. Therefore, any rule of construction that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not apply in construing this Agreement.

P. Attorney Fees and Costs. If any action at law or in equity, including action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees and costs, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which such Party may be entitled.

Q. Modification; Approvals. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by the Parties. Any approval or consent that is to be given by City

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing, and any approval or consent that is not in writing shall not be binding on City.

R. Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated into and made part of this Agreement:

Exhibit A: Legal Description of Property
Exhibit B: Copy of Final Map
Exhibit C: Cost Estimate for Improvements
Exhibit D: Performance Bond
Exhibit E: Payment Bond
Exhibit F: Warranty Bond
[Signatures on following page]

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates signed below.

CITY:

CITY OF PATTERSON,
a California municipality
By:

Print:

City Manager
Date:

ATTEST:

By:

Print: ______
City Clerk
SUBDIVIDER:

SELF-HELP ENTERPRISES,
A California Non-Profit Benefit Corporation
By:

Print:

Title:

Date: __________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Print: ______
City Attorney

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ________________
On ______________________before me, ______________________________, a notary public, personally appeared __________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person9s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}

EXHIBIT A
Legal Description of Property

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the

Page 1 of 2 ends

ORDER NO. : 1117027881

EXHIBIT A
The land referred to is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, and is described as follows:

Parcel One:

Parcel D, as shown on that certain map, entitled ‘Villages of Patterson Stonegate Shire Unit 1 – Final “B” Map’, filed December 28, 2017 in Book 44 of Maps, at Page 58, Stanislaus County Records.

EXCEPTING THEREFROM an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, petroleum, naphtha, other hydrocarbon substances and minerals of whatsoever kind and nature in, upon or beneath the property hereinafter described, together with the right of entry and all other rights, including all rights of way with easements, which may be necessary for the development, production and removal of all such substances and minerals, as reserved in the deed from the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation recorded March 25, 1941, in Book 730, at Page 123, Stanislaus County Official Records.

APN: 047-061-043-000
Parcel Two:

Remainder 1, as shown on the Map, entitled "Villages of Patterson- Stonegate Shire Unit 1- Final "B" Map", filed for record December 28, 2017, in Book 44 of Maps, at Page 58, Stanislaus County Records.

EXCEPT THEREFROM that portion of Remainder 1 of said "Villages of Patterson- Stonegate Shire Unit 1- Final "B" Map", described as follows:

COMMENCING at the Southeasterly corner of said Parcel "A"; thence along the Southwesterly line of 64.00 foot wide Logan Way, North 30° 00' 00" West, a distance of 405.28 feet to the most Easterly corner common to said Parcel "A" and said Remainder 1 and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along said line, North 30° 00' 00" West, a distance of 17.74 feet to the beginning of a curve concave Northeasterly having a radius of 532.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along said curve through a central angle of 09° 59' 12", a distance of 92.73 feet; thence leaving said Southwesterly line, South 59° 59' 48" West a distance of 98.06 feet to the most Northerly corner of said Parcel "A"; thence along a line common to said Parcel "A" and said Remainder 1, South 30° 00' 00" East, a distance of 110.00 feet; thence along a line common to said Parcel "A" and said Remainder 1, North 59° 59' 48" East, a distance of 90.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas, petroleum, naphtha, other hydrocarbon substances and minerals of whatsoever kind and nature in, upon or beneath the property hereinafter described, together with the right of entry and all other rights, including all rights of way with easements, which may be necessary for the development, production and removal of all such substances and minerals, as reserved in the

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the

Page 2 of 2 ends

deed from the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation recorded March 25, 1941, in Book 730, at Page 123, Stanislaus County Official Records.

Being Parcel 3 on the Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment No. 19-03, recorded September 9, 2019, Instrument No. 2019-0060594, Stanislaus County Official Records.

APN: 047-059-013-000
Parcel Three:

Parcel C as shown on a Parcel Map filed October 1, 2007 in Book 55, Page 56 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the Recorder of Stanislaus County, California EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Parcel D and that portion of Logan Way lying within that certain Map entitled “Villages of Patterson Stonegate Shire Unit 1 – Final “B” Map”, which Map was filed in the Office of the Recorder of the County of Stanislaus, State of California, on December 28, 2017 in Book 44 of Maps, at Page 58.

The above legal description is also known as Remainder 2, on that certain Map entitled “Villages of Patterson Stonegate Shire Unit 1 – Final “B” Map”, which Map was filed on December 28, 2017 in Book 44 of Maps, at Page 58, Stanislaus County Records.

APN: 047-059-010-000
NOTE: It is anticipated that the use of the Parcel Three legal description will not be in violation of the Subdivision Map Act by reason of common ownership of contiguous land or otherwise with the approval by the City of Patterson/County of Stanislaus.

Any use of this legal description prior to such approval or without satisfactory evidence of compliance with or non-violation of the Act, shall be deemed to be without the consent of Old Republic Title Company and/or its underwriters.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}

EXHIBIT B
Copy of Final Map

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 2 - FINAL "B" MAP
V
il
a
g
e
s
o
f
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
R

D OWNER'S STATEMENT
G GDR ENGINEERING, Inc. NOTARY STATEMENT CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S CERTIFICATE CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT TAX COLLECTOR'S STATEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION'S STATEMENT SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT CITY'S SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT OMITTED SIGNATURES STATEMENT DO NOT STAMP FEE TITLE DEDICATION BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "D", REMAINDER 2, AND A PORTION OF REMAINDER 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44 OF MAPS, PAGE 58, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 19, T.5 S., R.8 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN 10.1.b Packet Pg. 566
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help)

BENNETT
DRIVE
LOGAN
WAY TEMPORARY STORM DRAIN BASIN AND FACILITIES EASEMENT (A) DOC. NO. 1993-0022242 PARCEL "A" (55 - PM - 56) PARCEL "B" (55 - PM - 56) PARCEL "C" (44 - M - 58) PARCEL 2 (DOC. NO. 2019-0060594) PARCEL 1 (DOC. NO. 2019-0060594) PARCEL 3 (DOC. NO. 2019-0060594) REMAINDER 2 (44 - M - 58) VILLAGES OF PATTERSON STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 1 (44 - M - 58) NORTH FIRST STREET WALNUT AVENUE 22 21 20 19 18 17 161514 13121110 987
5 1 2
3 4 41 40 39 38 33 34 35 36 37 32 30 29 28 23 24 25 26 27 6 PARCEL "D"
(44 - M - 58) 31
WESTBURY LANE YORKSHIRE DRIVE LITTLETON DRIVE STONEGATE DRIVE 103 9899 114 110 113 111 100 96 7879 807677 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 93 94 95 54 52 59585756556061 67 65 64 66686970727371 112 115 116 117 118 109 108 107 106 105 102 101 104 97 53 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 6263 7574 92 42 REMAINDER 119

LOGAN WAY
R
D
G GDR ENGINEERING, Inc.

R G
D BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "D", REMAINDER 2, AND A PORTION OF REMAINDER 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44 OF MAPS, PAGE 58, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 19, T.5 S., R.8 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 2 - FINAL "B" MAP LEGEND BASIS OF BEARINGS OLIVE AVENUE V
il
a
g
e
s
o
f
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n GENERAL NOTES MONUMENTATION NOTE 10.1.b
Packet Pg. 567
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help) PARCEL "A" (55 - PM - 56) PARCEL 2 (DOC. NO. 2019-0060594) PARCEL 1 (DOC. NO. 2019-0060594) NORTH FIRST STREET WALNUT AVENUE 22333223
LOGAN
WAY

BENNETT

DRIVE STONEGATE DRIVE

LOGAN WAY
CRAVEN COURT 101 102
115
116
117
118 113
114 112
49 48
47 46
42 50
43 52
51 45
44 545556576364 6158626059 657172737467686970 6675 7677 99 100

CLIFTON
LANE

INGLETON
LANE
53 R
D
G GDR ENGINEERING, Inc.

R G
D STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 2 - FINAL "B" MAP LEGEND
V
il
a
g
e
s
o
f
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n GENERAL NOTES 53 55 PARCEL 2 (DOC. NO. 2019-0060594) DETAIL ''E'' BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "D", REMAINDER 2, AND A PORTION OF REMAINDER 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44 OF MAPS, PAGE 58, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 19, T.5 S., R.8 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN SEE SHEET 4 10.1.b Packet Pg. 568
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help) TEMPORARY STORM DRAIN BASIN AND FACILITIES EASEMENT (A) STONEGATE DRIVE DOC. NO. 1993-0022242 PARCEL "A" (55 - PM - 56) PARCEL "B" (55 - PM - 56) PARCEL "C" (44 - M - 58) VILLAGES OF PATTERSON STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 1 (44 - M - 58) LOGAN WAY 1
2 3 41 40 39 38

CLIFTON LANE SCARBOROUGH DRIVE STONEGATE DRIVE
CRAVEN
COURT 110 103 104 101 102
115
118 105
117 106
116
108
107 113
114 111
109 112 75 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42
84 85
92 93
86 94
87 95
88 89
82 83
90 91 8076777879 81 97 96 98 99 100

INGLETON LANE
REMAINDER 119 PICKERING COURT
R
D
G GDR ENGINEERING, Inc. STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 2 - FINAL "B" MAP V
il
a
g
e
s
o
f
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
R G
D LEGEND GENERAL NOTESOLIVE AVENUE WALNUT AVENUE BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "D", REMAINDER 2, AND A PORTION OF REMAINDER 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44 OF MAPS, PAGE 58, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 19, T.5 S., R.8 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN SEE SHEET 3 10.1.b Packet Pg. 569
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help) LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION LENGTH LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION LENGTH LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION LENGTH CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CHORD CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH CHORD LINE TABLE LINE DIRECTION 41 R
D
G GDR ENGINEERING, Inc. STONEGATE SHIRE UNIT 2 - FINAL "B" MAP PARCEL "A" 75

NORTH FIRST STREET DETAIL ''A'' DETAIL ''C'' DETAIL ''D'' 95 NORTH FIRST STREET DOC. NO. 1993-0022242 119 DETAIL ''B'' 42 100
43 LOGAN
WAY

REMAINDER
V
il
a
g
e
s
o
f
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL "D", REMAINDER 2, AND A PORTION OF REMAINDER 1 AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 44 OF MAPS, PAGE 58, STANISLAUS COUNTY RECORDS, LYING IN SECTION 19, T.5 S., R.8 E., MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN 10.1.b Packet Pg. 570
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with Self-Help) {CW143350.4}

EXHIBIT C
Cost Estimate for Improvements

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 572
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 573
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 574
Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}

EXHIBIT D
Performance Bond

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}

EXHIBIT E
Payment Bond

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the {CW143350.4}

EXHIBIT F
Warranty Bond

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: 2024.11.01_(Stonegate Shire Phase 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Adopt the Resolution No. 2024-64 to Approve the

Patterson City CouncilNovember 19, 2024

Patterson City Council
November 19, 2024