Agenda packet, joint meeting, first session — Perris City Council, September 29, 2026 (part 2 of 5)

City of Perris
Art Mural Program Application
Call for Artists
City of Perris Public Art – Art Mural Application 2 of 3

ARTIST INFORMATION
Name:

Business Tax ID Number (if applicable):

Company Name (if applicable):

Applicant Name (First, Last): ___
E-mail Address: Website:

Mailing Address: City:

Phone Number: Mobile Number:

Are you (the artist) a resident of the City of Perris? Yes ___ No ___ Preferred method of Contact:

Ƒ Business Phone Ƒ Mobile Phone Ƒ Email

PROPOSED ARTWORK INFORMATION
Artwork Title:

Artwork Description: ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________
Artwork Material: _____________________________
____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Artwork Dimension: ___________________________
Estimated Completion Date: _____________________
Artwork Location: _________________________________________________________________________ Ƒ 3XEOLF3URSHUW\
Ƒ 3ULYDWH3URSHUW\
If on private property, has the property owner been contacted? Yes ____ No____ Property Owner Contact:

Name (First, Last):________________________Phone Number: (____)________________________ Email:______________________________________________________________________________ *Include “Proposed Artwork Design” as attachment
PROPOSAL 1
Western Block Wall
Samuel Tapia
Samuel Tapia
[email protected]
Foss Field Park Western Wall Mural
Foss Field Park
1511 Almond Dr
951-462-3813
Perris
NA
NA
142’ W 8’ H
A bold, welcoming mural for the western block wall at Foss Field Park inspired by Perris’ rail history, rolling hills, and California poppies. Using a minimal color palette and strong graphic shapes, the design is meant to create a memorable park landmark that feels rooted in Perris and built to last.

Dunn-Edwards exterior acrylic
mural paint system, primer, and anti-grati
protective coating

Page 4 of 23 ends

5–7 weeks from project approval
418
City of Perris
Art Mural Program Application
Call for Artists
City of Perris Public Art – Art Mural Application 3 of 3

PROPOSED PROJECT CONCEPT STATEMENT
*If additional space is needed, please submit attachment

BUDGET PROPOSAL SECTION
Project Budget: $ _________________________________
If the City is unable to fund the full proposed amount, would you be able to still execute the art piece? Yes ____ No _____
Do you have additional funding for this art piece? Yes ____ No _____ If yes, please list:___________________________________________

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS
Ƒ Artwork Design Ƒ Project Concept Statement Ƒ 3URMHFW&RQFHSW6WDWHPHQW Ƒ Examples of Previous Artwork Ƒ Evidence of Value of Artwork Ƒ Itemized Project Budget Ƒ 0DLQWHQDQFH3ODQ Ƒ Project Schedule Ƒ Agreement Between Artist and Property Owner
*If applicable, supporting materials (e.g., videos, links, etc.) may be included as an attachment.

CERTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION
By signing below, I acknowledge that I am authorized to sign this application. I have read and agree to abide by the City of Perris Art Mural requirements. I understand that this application is subject to City review, approval, and denial.

Applicant Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________ Applicant Name (Print): ________________________________________ For questions on the City of Perris Art Mural Program, contact the Public Art team at [email protected] or at (951) 435-7206 or visit www.cityofperris.org/publicart Samuel Tapia
03/30/2026
28,000
Public art has the ability to de
ne a space and create a lasting visual identity for the community. This proposal focuses on creating a bold, clean, and durable mural that celebrates Perris’ identity through its rail history, landscape, and local symbolism while remaining accessible and visually impactful. The design approach prioritizes strong composition, readability, and long-term performance, ensuring the artwork remains vibrant and relevant over time.

PROPOSAL 1
Western Block Wall

Page 5 of 23419 ends

City of Perris
Art Mural Program Application
Call for Artists
City of Perris Public Art – Art Mural Application 2 of 3

ARTIST INFORMATION
Name:

Business Tax ID Number (if applicable):

Company Name (if applicable):

Applicant Name (First, Last): ___
E-mail Address: Website:

Mailing Address: City:

Phone Number: Mobile Number:

Are you (the artist) a resident of the City of Perris? Yes ___ No ___ Preferred method of Contact:

Ƒ Business Phone Ƒ Mobile Phone Ƒ Email

PROPOSED ARTWORK INFORMATION
Artwork Title:

Name (First, Last):________________________Phone Number: (____)________________________ Email:______________________________________________________________________________ *Include “Proposed Artwork Design” as attachment
Samuel Tapia
Samuel Tapia
[email protected]
Foss Field Park Existing Mural Restoration
Foss Field Park
1511 Almond Dr
951-462-3813
Perris
NA
NA
Dunn-Edwards exterior acrylic
mural paint system, primer, and anti-grati
protective coating
Existing mural surface
Approx: 600 sq ft
3–4 weeks from project approval
Restoration of the existing Foss Field Park mural, focusing on color matching, surface prep, and repainting to return the artwork to its original clarity and vibrancy. Work includes cleaning, repairing worn areas, re-establishing linework, and applying a protective anti-grati coating to extend the mural’s lifespan.

PROPOSAL 2
Existing Mural Restoration

Page 6 of 23420 ends

City of Perris
Art Mural Program Application
Call for Artists
City of Perris Public Art – Art Mural Application 3 of 3

PROPOSED PROJECT CONCEPT STATEMENT
*If additional space is needed, please submit attachment

Applicant Signature: ___________________________________________ Date: _____________ Applicant Name (Print): ________________________________________ For questions on the City of Perris Art Mural Program, contact the Public Art team at [email protected] or at (951) 435-7206 or visit www.cityofperris.org/publicart Samuel Tapia
03/30/2026
A focused restoration of the existing Foss Field Park mural, bringing back its original color, clarity, and impact. The approach prioritizes accuracy, durability, and respect for the original design while extending the life of the artwork for the community to continue enjoying.

PROPOSAL 2
Existing Mural Restoration
16,000

Page 7 of 23421 ends

Dear Selection Committee,
I am submitting this proposal for the Foss Field Park Public Art Projects with a focus on the Western Block Wall Mural and Mural Restoration. I am a Perris resident and graphic designer specializing in murals, public-facing graphics, and site-specific visual concepts for schools, district spaces, and community environments.

My work is rooted in strong composition, clear readability, and practical execution at scale. For Foss Field Park, I am proposing a bold western block wall mural that draws from Perris’ rail history, layered hills, and California poppies to create a durable, welcoming visual landmark for the park. I am also proposing a full-color restoration of the existing mural focused on bringing back its clarity, color, and overall visual impact while protecting it for long-term durability.

As a Perris resident, I value the opportunity to contribute to a public space in my own community. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Sam Tapia

Page 8 of 23422 ends

This proposal includes two connected public art improvements at Foss Field Park: a new Western Block Wall Mural and the restoration of the existing mural. The design approach is based on strong composition, clear readability, and long-term durability • New large-scale mural anchored by Foss Field name and Perris-inspired imagery reflecting history, recreation, movement, and community identity.
• Restoration of the existing mural through repair, color renewal, finish consistency, and protective coating to
improve clarity and longevity.

PROPOSED PROJECT CONCEPT
Western Block Wall Mural
Concept Priorities
Mural Restoration
• Maintainable Color System
• Bold Readability • Site-Responsive Design • Cohesive Park identity • Durable Finish

Page 9 of 23423 ends

WESTERN BLOCK WALL MURAL

PERRIS RAIL HISTORY REFERENCE
Foss Field Park / 142' W × 8' H (1,136 sq ft)
2 2 PARK NAME ANCHORING TEXT
2 CITY OF PERRIS LOGO
2 LANDSCAPE + POPPIES
Large central “Foss Field Park”
lettering creates a clear visual
landmark and improves
recognition from a distance.

City logo adapted into the
selected color palette to maintain
consistency while reinforcing
civic identity.

The train and rail line reference
Perris’ railroad history and honor
an important part of the city’s
identity.

CONCEPT OVERVIEW SELECTED PALETTE
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
A bold, welcoming mural for the western block wall at Foss Field Park inspired by Perris’ rail history, rolling hills, and California poppies. Using a minimal color palette and strong graphic shapes, the design is intended to create a memorable park landmark that feels rooted in Perris and built to last.

Layered hills and California
poppies connect the mural to
regional identity using a simple,
durable graphic language.

Designed for strong visibility, simplified maintenance, and long-term outdoor durability.� This design is a preliminary concept and will be refined in collaboration with the City to ensure the best final outcome for the space.

Page 10 of 23424 ends

ITEMIZED PROJECT
BUDGET - 1
Western Block Wall Mural 142' W × 8' H (1,136 sq ft)
Design & Project Development $6,000
$16,500
$2,100
$300
$500
$1,100
$1,000
Concept design, layout, and production planning
Artist Labor
Primary mural execution and project oversight
Materials & Surface Prep
Exterior paint system, primer, consumables, and minor surface prep Project Signage & Safety Barriers
Temporary signage, cones, barriers, and work zone setup Insurance
General liability insurance (project coverage)
Anti-Grati Protective Coating
Final protective finish
Contingency
Unforeseen site conditions and adjustments

BUDGET OVERVIEW
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET: $28,000

Page 11 of 23 ends

• Budget reflects full project scope including planning, labor, materials, insurance, protective coating, and required site safety measures. Final costs subject to site conditions and approvals
425

ITEMIZED PROJECT
BUDGET - 2
Mural Restoration Full-Color Restoration
Restoration Planning & Color Matching $2,500
$9,500
$1,500
$300
$500
$800
$900
Existing mural review, color matching, and restoration planning Artist Labor
Primary restoration execution and project oversight
Materials & Surface Prep
Exterior paint system, primer, consumables, and minor surface prep Project Signage & Safety Barriers
Temporary signage, cones, barriers, and work zone setup Insurance
General liability insurance (project coverage)
Anti-Grati Protective Coating
Final protective finish
Contingency
Unforeseen site conditions and adjustments

BUDGET OVERVIEW
TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET: $16,000

Page 12 of 23 ends

• Budget reflects full project scope including planning, labor, materials, insurance, protective coating, and required site safety measures. Final costs subject to site conditions and approvals
426

HAND PAINTED MURAL

GENERAL MAINTENANCE PLAN
The murals will be executed using high-quality exterior paint systems designed for durability, UV resistance, and long-term color retention.

Protective Coating
A clear anti-gra
ti coating will be applied to help protect against vandalism, weather exposure, and general wear, allowing for easier cleaning and extended lifespan.

Material Documentation
All colors and materials will be documented to allow for accurate future touch-ups if required.

Future Maintenance Support
The artist may assist with one touch-up visit if significant damage occurs within 3 years, with paint and materials provided by the client. Any additional work will be considered a separate scope of work.

Expected Longevity
The mural is expected to maintain its visual quality for approximately 5–10 years with minimal maintenance, depending on environmental conditions and site exposure.

Routine Maintenance
No ongoing maintenance is required from the artist.

MAINTENANCE OVERVIEW
• Maintenance approach allows flexibility for future upkeep based on site conditions and City needs.

Page 13 of 23427 ends

APPROXIMATE PROJECT

SCHEDULE
Pre-Production (Planning & Approvals) 1–2 Weeks
2–3 Days
4–5 Weeks
1–2 Days
Concept refinement, color selection, site coordination
• Timeline is approximate and subject to adjustment based on final • approval, site conditions, weather, material availability, and project • coordination.

Surface Preparation
Cleaning, minor repairs, layout marking
Mural Execution
Base coats, main composition, detailing, lettering
Final Coating & Cleanup
Protective coating, final walkthrough, site cleanup

PROJECT TIMELINE
ESTIMATED DURATION: 5–6 WEEKS (AFTER APPROVAL)
Western Block Wall Mural 142' W × 8' H (1,136 sq ft)

Page 14 of 23428 ends

APPROXIMATE PROJECT

SCHEDULE
Mural Restoration
Pre-Production (Planning & Approvals) 1–2 Weeks
2–3 Days
3–5 Weeks
1–2 Days
Concept refinement, color selection, site coordination
Surface Preparation
Cleaning, minor repairs, layout marking
Mural Execution
Base coats, main composition, detailing, lettering
Final Coating & Cleanup
Protective coating, final walkthrough, site cleanup

PROJECT TIMELINE
ESTIMATED DURATION: 4–5 WEEKS (AFTER APPROVAL)
Full-Color Restoration
• Timeline is approximate and subject to adjustment based on final • approval, site conditions, weather, material availability, and project • coordination.

Page 15 of 23429 ends

SELECTED WORK / ART PORTFOLIO / 2026

SAM TAPIA
GRAPHIC DESIGNER + MURAL ARTIST

PERRIS, CA
951-462-3813
[email protected]
@SAM_TAPIA
Creating murals, graphics, and branded visual work for schools, public spaces, and commercial environments.

Page 16 of 23430 ends

I’m a Perris, California artist and designer specializing in graphic design, hand painted murals, mural restoration, and site-specific graphics for schools and public-facing spaces. My work is rooted in strong composition, clear readability, and practical design development, from early paint concepts and architectural mockups to final large-scale installation. I create visuals that respond to the character of a site while staying realistic for production, durability, and long-term impact.

ABOUT ME

SAM TAPIA
951-462-3813
[email protected]
@SAM_TAPIA
Selected projects include work completed in collaboration with Labeld Ink Inc.

Specific roles are noted on each project sheet.

Page 17 of 23431 ends

HARADA HOUSE

HISTORIC MURAL / COMMUNITY STORYTELLING
Harada Elementary School, Riverside, CA
2025
Created for the transition from
Highland Elementary to Harada
Elementary, this mural honors
the Harada family’s story and
legacy through a bold,
site-specific design.

Concept Development and Application

HISTORIC LANDMARK MURAL

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Role: Paint Execution of
Approved Design

Page 18 of 23432 ends

NICOLET PALOMINOS
School Campus Identity Mural / Restoration
Nicolet Middle School, Banning, CA
2025
This project refreshed an
existing mural at Nicolet Middle
School by redesigning the horse
imagery to feel stronger,
cleaner, and more cohesive,
Visual Redevelopment and Application

MURAL RESTORATION

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Role: Paint Execution of
Approved Design

Page 19 of 23433 ends

DISTRICT OFFICE
Site Identity Graphic / Entry Mark
Colton Joint Unified School District O
ce, Colton, CA
2024
This hand-painted floor logo was
created at the entrance of the
Colton Joint Unified School
District office as a bold site
identity graphic.

Layout, Surface Painting, and Graphic Execution

ENTRY FLOOR LOGO

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Role: Paint Execution of
Approved Design

Page 20 of 23434 ends

VISTA DEL LAGO RAVENS
School Campus Identity Mural / Restoration
Vista Del Lago High School, Moreno Valley, CA
2023
This mural restoration at Vista
del Lago High School refreshed
a large-scale campus identity
wall with cleaner forms, stronger
contrast, and a more polished
overall finish.

Visual Redevelopment and Application

MURAL RESTORATION

PROJECT OVERVIEW
Role: Paint Execution of
Approved Design

Page 21 of 23435 ends

The work presented reflects my experience across school murals, restorations, campus branding, and site-specific graphics for public-facing environments.

March Mountain High School
School Identity Mural / 2020
Flabob Airport / 2023 Cabazon Elementary School
School Identity Mural / 2024
Arroyo Valley High School
Campus Branding / 2025
Midland Elementary School
School Identity Mural / 2020
Badger Springs Middle School
School Identity Mural / 2023

THANK YOU

SAM TAPIA
951-462-3813
[email protected]
@SAM_TAPIA Page 22 of 23436

REFERENCES
Foss Field Park Public Art Proposal
Reference Patrick Barwinski
Organization Barwinski Design
Email [email protected]
Phone (951) 796-2772
Reference Jonathan Caban
Organization Labeld Ink
Email [email protected]
Phone (951) 941-0536
Submitted by Sam Tapia

Page 22 of 23437 ends

FOSS FIELD PARK

PUBLIC ART PROJECT PROPOSAL

FOSS FIELD PARK

PUBLIC ART PROJECT PROPOSAL
Miguel Chavez
438
Monday, April 6, 2026

ARTIST INFORMATION
City of Perris
Public Services Department
Foss Field Park Public Art Projects
Request for Proposal (RFP)

OVERVIEW
In 2019, the City of Perris established the Public Art Initiative to advance the development of public art projects throughout the city. This initiative supports cultural and artistic resources, including visual artwork, performing arts, and architectural elements to celebrate the City’s diverse cultural identity and enhance community beautification. The Public Art Initiative continues to guide ongoing efforts to preserve and promote the City’s history, culture, architectural heritage, and community well-being through public art programs, events, and projects that enrich community vitality, public health, and public engagement.

To further these goals, the City of Perris Public Service Department will be submitting a grant proposal to the Arts in California Parks program. Launched in 2024 through a partnership between California State Parks, the California Arts Council, and Parks California, this community‑focused grant program activates local parks through community-centered art and cultural experiences that foster creativity, connection and a deeper relationship to California’s natural and cultural landscapes. For the 2026 grant cycle, funded projects must be planned for implementation during the grant period of October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027. The program anticipates awarding up to $2.5 million in total funding, with individual awards ranging from $15,000 to $100,000, depending on project scale and need.

The City’s grant proposal will include a total of (4) public art projects at Foss Field Park (reference Section II). Implementation and award of all four project components are contingent upon the City’s successful receipt of grant funding and the City’s direction to proceed with public art projects subject to available funding. Should the City of Perris not be awarded funding through this grant program, the City will phase the projects as funding becomes available. For additional information about the Arts in California Parks Grant Program, please visit: https://artsincaliforniaparks.org/grants-program.

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST
The following items will be required in order to submit a complete application for consideration.

1. Completed and Signed Application Form

2. Applicant(s) resume(s) to include a brief one (1) page summary of work, qualifications, portfolio examples, including images and reviews of previously completed art/mural art, description of the size, materials, cost, location, and references for earlier projects.

3. Project timeline including how long it will take to complete the artwork.

4. Statement or cover letter explaining why this project appeals to you. 1 Document ID: 260957833900059
439

5. Itemized budget (include the applicants fees, insurance costs, materials/supply costs, rental equipment, portable lighting and generator, staging, project signage and all other associated costs to complete the project.

6. Proof of insurance

7. A narrative and design illustrating the concept, including a digital format of all components, images and color representation of the proposed mural to include:

A. A description of the approach to the project such as methods of site preparation, or other material to secure the longevity of the mural.

B. Identification of the medium, material, timeline for completion and dimensions for the proposed mural by considering that it is intended to be seen at all times.

C. Warranty for completed work including the use of durable materials with suitable longevity.

8. A suitable maintenance plan that incorporates a schedule of costs and timeline for maintenance, inspections, surface cleanings, additional coats of protective for the mural’s longevity,

9. For public safety the artist(s) shall comply with the following:

A. Approval of insurance from the City’s Risk Management Office will be required.

B. There should be no accessible sharp edges, points, or projections that can cut, puncture or cause injury by impact.

C. All applicable building codes and standards shall apply to structures.

Applications must follow the following submittal requirements and application submittal does not guarantee approval.

For questions regarding this application or the City of Perris Art Mural Program, please contact the Public Services Department at [email protected] or at (951) 435-7206 or visit www.cityofperris.org/publicart.

Name Miguel Chavez
Phone Number (909) 491-8944
Email [email protected]
Address 24645 gold star drive
Moreno Valley, CA, 92551
Proof of Insurance
PDF Proof of Insurance.pdf
Resume
PDF Resume (5).pdf
Examples of Previous Artwork
PDF Portfolio (2).pdf
Are you (the artist) a resident of the
City of Perris?
No
2 Document ID: 260957833900059
440
Preferred method of contact Email
How did you hear about the Foss Field
RFP?
City of Perris Webpage

PROPOSED ARTWORK INFORMATION
Artwork Title This is Perris
Artwork Description
This mural tells the story of Perris with history, nature and landmarks. The composition consists of historical landmarks such as The Perris Depot Railroad Station, The Bank of Perris, The Perris Theater, The Southern Hotel, and The Perris Civic Center. Along with beautiful nature aspects such as a landscape dedicated to Lake Perris, California poppies, and agricultural elements such as corn crops. All of these locations and elements hold great value to the City of Perris and highlight the city's identity. The monarch butterfly plays an important role in the mural symbolizing transformation, growth, and resilience. Flowing across the design, the monarch butterfly shows the growth of Perris over time and the strength of the community. The goal of this project is to enhance the public space with elements that will bring the community together and showcase the beauty of Perris.

Proposed Artwork Design
PDF Untitled_Artwork (4).pdf
Artwork Material Professional Grade Acrylic exterior paint Artwork Dimensions 142' L x 8' H

ARTIST PROPOSAL
Proposed Project Type Western Block Wall Mural
Proposed Project Statement/ Cover Letter
As an artist, this opportunity truly highlights my goals and passions. I am dedicated to creating work that not only beautifies a space, but also tells a story and brings communities together. This mural is designed to celebrate the history of the City of Perris and showcase its beauty. I am inspired by creating meaningful work that will highlight the city's identity and last for as long as possible. This opportunity would give me the chance to bring the community together through public engagement, participation and represent the voice and identity of the city.

Maintenance Plan
In order to maintain the longevity of this mural, I plan to apply a clear anti-graffiti protection sealer over the mural once it is fully completed to protect the mural. This will allow the mural to maintain its original vibrant colors and protect the wall from all weather conditions. Anti-Graffiti protection also easily removes any spray paint, marker or tags without having to repaint. I plan to constantly inspect the mural after it is completed to make sure it is in proper care and no graffiti or damages are interfering with the mural.

Estimated Completion Date Tuesday, December 1, 2026
Project Timeline
PDF
Project proposal Timeline.pdf
3 Document ID: 260957833900059
441

BUDGET PROPOSAL
Project Budget 32200
Itemized Project Budget
PDF Project proposal (1).pdf
If the City is unable to fund the full
proposed amount, would you be able
to still execute the art piece?
Yes
Do you have additional funding for
this art piece? No
Required Documentation
Required Documents Checklist Copy of Insurance Artwork Design Resume and Examples of Previous Artwork
Project Concept Statement Itemized Project Budget
Maintenance Plan Project Schedule

CERTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATION
By signing below, I acknowledge that I am authorized to sign this application. I have read and agree to abide by the City of Perris Proposal requirements. I understand that this application is subject to City review, approval, and denial.

Signature
Date Monday, April 6, 2026
Name Miguel Chavez
4 Document ID: 260957833900059
442
Itemized Project Budget
Total : $32,200
Materials: $3,000
Insurance: $800
Artist Fee: $28,400
443
Timeline
Week 1- Site Preparation
● Prep materials
● Clean surface
● Grid Layout for sketch
● Sketch design on the primed surface.

Week 2-3- Painting Phase
● Begin painting by blocking in color and shapes.
● Continued by adding detail and working my way down the mural.

Week 4 - Completion and Protection Sealer
● Anti-graffiti clear protection sealer placed on top of mural to protect from weather and graffiti damages.
444
445
Miguel Chavez
(909) 491 8944
[email protected]
Miguel Chavez is a fine artist and muralist located in the Inland Empire. For many years Miguel has dedicated his time to beautifying public places through public art creating vibrant pieces of work. Through gallery work, mural opportunities and more Miguel is passionate about using his skills to bring happiness to the community around him.

Experience
Mural Artist
Share Tea Boba- Designed a large scale mural dedicated to nature and the city of Moreno Valley.

Sunnymead Mural- Participated in the first community mural located in Moreno valley alongside a team of muralists.

Omnitran- Chosen to design and paint a bus bench in the city of San Bernardino.

Maralyn Boutique- Butterfly mural located inside the Moreno Valley mall designed to capture the colors and style of the boutique.

Studio Artist
Experience working as a studio artist creating fine art for gallery work and clients.

Communicating with clients to make their vision come to life and capture beautiful moments.

Participated in gallery shows at the Eastside Arthouse in Riverside California and The Garcia Center for the Arts in San Bernardino.

Teaching
Experience teaching paint and sip classes at the Phearless Art Studio.

Invited to teach a large group of children to paint a winter wonderland at Rainbow Ridge Elementary School.

Work teaching students at Vista De Lago High School's performing arts center creating scenic artwork for theatre shows.

Awards
Mvc Commencement Artwork: Artwork published for the cover of the 2025 commencement ceremony at Moreno Valley College.

Sunnymead Mural: Recognized by the City of Moreno Valley for the participation in the first public mural in Moreno valley.

Veterans day contest- Winner of the Veterans day art contest for both public vote and city council choice.
446

CITY OF PERRIS

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA SUBMITTAL

10.J.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

MEETING DATE: September 29, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Final Tract Map 24-05025 (FTM 31157 ) – Final approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 31157 to subdivide 31.04 acres into 132 single-family residential lots, generally located west of Evans Road, south of Nuevo Road, and north of San Jacinto Avenue, in the R-6,000 Zone of the Parkwest Specific Plan. Applicant: Jason Keller, PW Land Investments, LP.

REQUESTED ACTION:

Approve Final Tract Map 24-05025 (FTM 31157), accept the Subdivision Improvement Agreements, and authorize the Mayor to sign the Final Tract Map.

CONTACT: Kenneth Phung, Director of Development Services On January 30, 2007, the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 31157 (TTM 31157 / TTM 03- 0019) for the development of 529 dwelling units on 156.9 acres within Phase I of the Parkwest Specific Plan located generally on the south side of Nuevo Road between the Perris Valley Storm Drain Channel and Dunlap Drive. Subsequently, on June 15, 2022, the applicant received Planning Commission approval of a Financing Parcel Map (FPM 38375) to allow the 529 dwelling units to be sold off and developed in four sub-phases. Sub-phases TTM 31157-1 with 131 lots, TTM 31157-2 with 80 lots, and TTM 31157-3 with 184 lots have received final map approval and have commenced construction.

FINAL TRACT MAP 31157:

The request is now for approval of the final phase of Tract Map 31157, consisting of 132 dwelling units on 31.04 acres. Approval of the final phase of this map will allow the developer to proceed with construction of the remaining homes and initiate sales once construction is complete.

The applicant has entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIA) to guarantee the construction of the required improvements and has submitted Improvement Agreements, which the City Attorney has approved. Furthermore, the developer will be responsible for all improvement costs.

Lastly, the final map will comply in all respects with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and .
447
BUDGET (or FISCAL) IMPACT:
applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Code.

Development Services, Engineering, and Community Services Departments have determined the applicant has satisfied all conditions of approval required for final map approval and recordation, and that the final phase of this map is substantially consistent with the approved tentative tract map.

Therefore, the City Engineer recommends approval of Final Tract Map No. 31157.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Final Tract Map 24-05025 (FTM 31157), as all conditions of approval have been satisfied, and the necessary City Department clearances have been obtained.

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action since all project costs are borne by the applicant.

Prepared By: Monica Carranza, Assistant Planner
Attachments:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Specific Plan Land Use Map

3. Final Tract Map No. 31157 (Final Phase)

4. Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Final Tract Map No. 31157

5. Conditions of Approval (Planning, Engineering, and Community Service) 448
ATTACHMENT 1
Vicinity Map
449

EVANS RDNUEVO RD

PARK WEST DR

BIG SUR LN DUNLAP DR

PALERMO DR

BENEDICT CT

ABERDEEN WAY

CHAMBERLIN CREEK WAY

SWEET BAY DR

ARLINGTON CT

KAUFFMAN ST

FORSYTHIA DR

CHAVEZ CIR

GALLATIN CIR

ADDISON WAY

FRIEDMAN ST

DELRYN CIR

CANTANIA DR BRYANT ST

SCARLET SAGE DR

MENDOCINO WAY

RAVENNA LN

BENTON WAY

RIVERFRONT ST

MONARCH CT

EL NIDO AVE

NATIONAL ST

ALBERHILL WAY

CATANIA DR

SAN JACINTO AVE

MURRIETA RD

EVANS ST CENTER ST

BOUNDARY RD
Vicinity Map
KEY
Perris Boundary
Project Site
0 462.5 925 1,850 ft
0 140 280 560 m
1:12,111
COUNTY
OF

RIVERSIDE
450
ATTACHMENT 2
Specific Plan Land Use Map
451

EVANS RDNUEVO RD

PARK WEST DR

BIG SUR LN DUNLAP DR

PALERMO DR

ABERDEEN WAY

ARLINGTON CT

FORSYTHIA DR

CHAVEZ CIR

GALLATIN CIR

CANTANIA DR BRYANT ST

MENDOCINO WAY

RAVENNA LN

HENDY WOODS CIR

BENTON WAY

FARREL WAY

MONARCH CT

KORBEL ST

EL NIDO AVE

NATIONAL ST

CATANIA DR

SAN JACINTO AVE

MURRIETA RD

EVANS ST

CENTER ST

BOUNDARY RD
CC
CC
CN
MFR-14 MFR-14
P
P
P
P
PW-SP (6000)
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000 R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000
R-6,000 SHO
R-10,000
R-10,000
R-10,000
R-10,000
R-10,000 CC
PO
R-10,000

NPSP - C NPSP - R&D PW-SP (OSB) PW-SP (MH) PW-SP (OSB)
PW-SP (5000)
PW-SP (6000)

PW-SP (ROSB)
PW-SP (6000)
PW-SP (7000)
PW-SP (7000)

PW-SP (CP)

PW-SP (MSCHP)

PW-SP (S)
PW-SP (5000)
PW-SP (6000)
PW-SP (5000)
PW-SP (7000)

PW-SP (ROSB)
PW-SP (6000)
PW-SP (5000) PW-SP (5000)
PW-SP (5000)
PW-SP (5000)
Parkwest Specific Plan Land Use Map
KEY
Zoning
Commercial Community (CC)
Commercial Neighborhood (CN)
Multi Family Resident 14 (MFR-14)
New Perris Specific Plan Commercial (NPSP - C)
New Perris Specific Plan Research & Development (NPSP - R&D) Parkwest -Median PW-SP (5000)
Parkwest -Median PW-SP (6000)
Parkwest -Median PW-SP (7000)
Parkwest -Specific Plan Community Park PW-SP (CP)
Parkwest -OS Basin PW-SP (OSB)
Parkwest -Regional Basin OS PW-SP (ROSB)
Parkwest -Median High (Townhomes) PW-SP (MH)
Parkwest - MSCHP (OS) PW-SP (MSCHP)
Parkwest -Specific Plan School PW-SP (S)
Public (P)
Professional Office (PO)
Residential 6,000 (R-6,000)
Residential Senior Housing Overlay (R-6,000 SHO)
Residential 10,000 (R-10,000)
Perris Boundary
Project Site
0 462.5 925 1,850 ft
0 140 280 560 m
1:12,111
COUNTY
OF

RIVERSIDE
452
ATTACHMENT 3
Final Tract Map No. 31157
453
TRACT MAP NO. 31157
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS APRIL, 2022 _________ __________________ ___
__________ _________
______________________
___________________________ ___________________________ __________________________________________________ W.O. 2021-0258 SEC. 28, T. 4S., R. 3 W., S.B.M.
________________________________________ ____ ____ _______ _____________________________________________________ ________________ _____________________________________ _____________________ _____________________________________ _____________________ ___________________ _____ ______________________________ _______________________________ __________________ _____ _____________________________________________ __________________________
__________________________
________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________ ______________________ _______________________________
__________________________
__________________________
___________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________ _________________________________________________ _______________ _______________
____________________________
_________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 454
TRACT MAP NO. 31157 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS APRIL, 2022 SEE SHEET 3 WEBB N W E S SEE SHEET 4 WEBB N W E S WEBB N W E S “ ” “ ” “ ” “ ” ’ ’ ’ ’ ’ “ ” ’ 455
TRACT MAP NO. 31157 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS APRIL, 2022 WEBB N W
E
S SEE SHEET 4 WEBB N
W
E
S
456
TRACT MAP NO. 31157 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS APRIL, 2022 WEBB N W E S SEE SHEET 3 WEBB N W E S 457
TRACT MAP NO. 31157 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES - CIVIL ENGINEERS APRIL, 2022 WEBB N W E S WEBB N W E S WEBB N W E S WEBB N W E S WEBB N W E S WEBB N W E S 458
ATTACHMENT 4
Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Final
Tract Map No. 31157
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
ATTACHMENT 5
Conditions of Approval (Planning, Engineering,
and Community Service)
507

CITY OF PERRIS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

PLANNING DIVISION

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PARKWEST SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 03-0288
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 31157(03-0019) January 30, 2007
PROJECT The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would: a) Remove the commercial designations on 32.0 acres; b) Reduce the acreage allocated to residential uses from 388.5 acres to 308.6 acres; c) Modify the range of lot sizes from 4,500-7,000 s.f. lots to 5,000-7,000 s.f. lots and townhomes; d) Decrease the amount of acreage dedicated to regional detention basin open space from 52.0 acres to 35.6 acres, which would be reserved to accommodate the future Perris Valley Storm Drain/San Jacinto River Plan Project or MSHCP; e) Dedicate approximately 90.2 acres along the eastern boundary of the property to MSHCP preservation (any portion not needed for regional detention purposes by the San Jacinto River Plan may be the subject of future development applications); f) Reconfigure the on-site circulation system in order to improve regional circulation, including regional access over the existing Perris Valley Strom Drain; and g) Accommodate the provision of an elementary school site on 12.3 acres. The school site may be developed with 57 additional single family units if a school is not constructed.

Tentative Tract Map 31157 (03-0019) proposes to subdivide 156.9 acres into 529 dwelling units, approximately 14.8 acres of community parkland, a 5.0 acre neighborhood park, and a 12.3 acre Elementary School site. This tract map would constitute Phase I of the Specific Plan.

APPROVED PLANS AND PROCESSES

1. Approval Period. In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, the recordation of the final map shall occur within two (2) years from the approval date unless an extension is granted. The applicant may apply for a maximum of five (5) one-year extensions, to permit additional time to record the final map. A written request for extension shall be submitted to the Department of Planning and Community Development at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of Tentative Map approval.

2. Approved Plans. This approval is granted to subdivide a 156.9-acre property into 529 residential lots; a 5.0-acre Neighborhood Park; a 12.3-acre school site; and, a 14.8-acre Community Park as noted in the project description (above). The Final Map shall be substantially as shown on the Tentative Tract Map, prepared by Engineering Solutions, for ParkWest Associates, LLC, dated July 14, 2006, and consisting of three sheets, except as may be modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein.

3. Precedence of Conditions. If any of the following Conditions of Approval alter a commitment made by the developer in the revised Parkwest Specific Plan text or map exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedence. 508
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 2 of 13
Conditions of Approval

4. Compliance with City Codes and Conditions. Development of the property shall be in accordance with the mandatory requirements of all Perris City ordinances and laws and shall conform substantially to the approved Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment as filed in the office of the Perris Department of Community Development, unless otherwise amended. Such requirements include:
a. Development Services Department. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for construction of any building or initiation of any use allowed by this approval, the applicant shall obtain clearance from the Development Services Department that all pertinent conditions of approval have been satisfied for the particular development phase or planning unit in question.
b. Building Official/Fire Marshall. The proposed project shall adhere to all requirements of the Building Official/Fire Marshal. Fire hydrants shall be located on the project site pursuant to the Building Official. Water, gas, sewer, electrical transformers, power vaults and separate fire/water supply lines (if applicable) must be shown on the final set of construction plans pursuant to the requirements of the Building Official. All Conditions of Approval shall be included on building plans.
c. City Engineer. The proposed project shall adhere to all requirements of the City Engineer, as indicated in the Conditions of Approval dated December 6, 2006.

Developer shall design and install street improvements according to the street sections shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, unless modified by the conditions set forth by the City Engineer.

5. Outside Agencies. Development of the property shall be in accordance with the plans and procedures of various Responsible Agencies. These include the following:
a. State and Federal Standards. The project shall conform to all disabled access requirements in accordance with the State of California, Title 24, and Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
b. State Water Resources Control Board. Prior to building permits, submit a copy of the Water Resources Control Board permit letter with WDID number. c. Southern California Edison. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall contact the area service planner (Art Alvarado at 951 928-8323) for Southern California Edison to complete their required forms. d. School Districts. The proposed project shall demonstrate payment of standard requirements and mitigation fees established by the Perris Elementary School District and Perris High School District.
e. Riverside County Flood Control. Prior to approval of any Final Tract Map, the developer shall obtain a written statement from the Riverside County Flood 509
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 3 of 13
Conditions of Approval
Control District, in a form satisfactory to the City, indicating that the developer has adequately demonstrated the viability of proposed drainage facilities. f. Riverside Transit Agency. The developer shall provide bus pull-out areas and shelters within the adopted Specific Plan boundary, as required by RTA. The location and number of bus pull-outs shall be subject to the approval of the City of Perris, Riverside Transit Agency, and applicable school districts. g. Airport Land Use Commission. The Airport Land Use Commission found this project inconsistent with 1984/86 Airport Land Use Plan. In order to overrule the Airport Land Use Commission and approve the proposed project, the following conditions are required for any subdivision of the project site, as per PUC 21675.1:
i. Avigation Easement. Prior to project development, recordation of the map, or sale to any entity exempt from the Subdivision Map Act, the applicant shall grant to the City of Perris and to the March Inland Port Airport Authority an avigation easement in the form and manner approved by the City Attorney and shall cause such easement to be duly recorded in the office of the County Recorder.
ii. Notice of Airport in Vicinity. A Notice of Airport in the Vicinity and aerial photograph identifying the location of March ARB and the project site shall be displayed and distributed in model homes at the project site.

The following statement is required for distribution.

NOTICE OF AIRPORT IN VICINTIY
“This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence area. For that reason, the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any are associated with the property before you complete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to you”.
iii. Disclosure. Buyers shall be provided the “Notice of Airport in Vicinity” disclosure at the time of closing for the purchase of a home or residential lot.
iv. Noise Attenuation. The applicant shall incorporate noise attenuation measures into the building construction to ensure interior noise levels are at or below 45 CNEL-decibel levels.
v. Lighting Plans. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, lighting plans shall be reviewed and approved by an airport lighting consultant or 510
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 4 of 13
Conditions of Approval
MARB/MIP.
vi. Prohibited Uses:
• Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following take off or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. • Any use which would reflect sunlight towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. • Any use which would generate excessive smoke or water vapor, attract concentrations of birds, or otherwise affect air navigation in the area.
• Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation.
• Any unlawful storage of explosives or flammable materials. • Obstructions of Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77 Conical Surface.

6. Fees. The developer shall pay the following fees according to the timeline noted herein:
a. The developer shall demonstrate payment of Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Mitigation Fees in effect at issuance of building permits.
b. The developer shall pay all City Development Impact Fees as programmed in the associated Development Agreement.
c. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide evidence of the payment of the required school fees. In recognition of the 12.3-acre school site provided in the tract, the developer may negotiate credits against such fees with the Perris Elementary School District.
d. The developer shall pay Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan fees in effect at issuance of building permits.
e. The developer shall pay Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees in effect at issuance of building permits, except as credited for construction of TUMF facilities under an agreement approved by the City.
511
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 5 of 13
Conditions of Approval
f. Upon development of a Park and Ride Program by the City of Perris, the developer shall fund its fair share of an appropriate number of spaces toward the program, to the extent that the program exists when building fees are paid. g. The developer shall pay any outstanding property liens and development processing fees owed to the city prior to the issuance of building permits.

FINAL MAPS

7. Submittal for Final Map. A final map application shall be submitted to the Planning Division with payment of appropriate fees for review and approval concurrently with application to the City Engineer. Prior to such application, the developer shall obtain the following clearances or approvals:
a. Final Specific Plan. Developer shall submit 20 Hard Copies and one pdf version of the approved Specific Plan, incorporating all language, text amendments, maps, and exhibits, as approved by the City Council and noted herein. b. Street Names. The applicant shall obtain Planning Commission approval of all proposed street names prior to approval of Final Map.
c. Financing Maps. A final tract map may be filed and recorded for financing purposes only. No permits shall be issued until maps creating individual buildable lots are filed, and all appropriate conditions of approval have been met.

Any Phasing Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Department and the City Engineer. Each Phase of the project shall provide adequate drainage and at least two points of access to all lots.

8. Recordation of Final Map. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer shall submit and obtain approvals on the following items:
a. Public improvement plans to the City Engineer. These plans shall include but not be limited to street, drainage, utility improvements, and dedications in accordance with Municipal Code Title 18.
b. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to the Planning Division and the City Attorney's office. Approved CC&Rs shall be recorded with the final map. c. Grading plans to the City Engineer, demonstrating compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requirements. The plans shall include a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan detailing water quality management controls and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control pollutant runoff. The applicant shall identify measures specified in Supplement A of the Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plans New Development Guidelines or other equally effective standard for implementing project BMPs, assignment of long-term maintenance responsibilities (specifying the developer, parcel owner, lessee, etc.) and shall reference the location(s) of structural BMPs. 512
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 6 of 13
Conditions of Approval
d. Any existing dedications that are not part of the current or future circulation system shall be vacated, provided that all utilities are abandoned or relocated, and no existing or future access to adjacent property owners is eliminated.

9. Assessment Districts. The project shall be annexed into any assessment, community facilities, or similar district that provides funding for maintenance, services, or public improvements that benefit the project. The costs and benefits shall be described in the applicable district and annexation documents. The Developer shall complete all actions required to complete such annexation prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

This condition shall apply only to districts existing at the time the project is approved.

Such districts may include but are not limited to the following:
a. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1;
b. Flood Control Maintenance District No. 1 (may include Streets); c. Maintenance District No. 84-1 (Street Lights and Traffic Signals); d. South Perris Community Facilities District (Police and Fire); e. Ramona Mobility Group District (Transportation Improvements); and f. Road and Bridge Benefit District (Transportation Improvements).

GRADING

10. Required Information. Prior to the recordation of each final map for each phase of development in question, the following information shall be provided:
a. Designation of areas of temporary borrowing or depositing of material. b. Construction schedule, including the identification of areas which will be graded during the higher probability of rain months of January through March. c. Hydrology and hydraulic concerns and mitigation.

11. Conceptual Grading Plans. Prior to any development within any planning area in Tentative Tract Map 31157, an overall Conceptual Grading Plan shall be submitted to the City of Perris for review and approval. This plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for each phase of development and shall include:
a. Techniques employed to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process;
b. Approximate time frames for grading;
c. Identification of areas which may be graded during rain season (Jan-Mar), if any; d. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.

12. Soils Report. Prior to initial grading activities within the project site, a current detailed Soils Report and Geotechnical Study shall be prepared which analyzes on-site soil 513
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 7 of 13
Conditions of Approval
conditions and slope stability and includes appropriate measures to control soil erosion.

LANDSCAPING

13. Landscaping. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit 3 copies of construction level Landscape and Irrigation Plans to the Community Development Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The plans shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect and include the location, number, genus species, and container size of the plants. Plants shall be consistent with Section 19.70 of the Perris Municipal Code. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area and note that it shall be maintained in accordance with Section 19.70 of the City Code. Water efficient fixtures and drought tolerant plants shall be utilized where possible.

Required landscape areas specific to this project include front yards of all lots; side yards of corner lots; streetscapes on the project side for Evans Road, Nuevo Road, San Jacinto Avenue, Dunlap Driver, Street “A” Street “B” and Street “C”; landscaping of slopes and entry theme walls; streetscapes for both sides of all in-tract roadways; and landscaping of Lot A including the detention facility, soccer fields, and all undisturbed portions. The a p p l i c a n t s h a l l i n s t a l l s i d e w a l k s t h r o u g h o u t t h e p r o j e c t .

14. Landscape Inspections. The project applicant shall be aware and inform the on-site project or construction manager and the landscape contractor of their responsibility to call for landscape inspections. A minimum of three (3) landscape inspections are required in the following order, and the landscape inspection card shall be signed by the City’s landscape inspector to signify approval at the following stages of landscape installation:
a. At installation of irrigation equipment, when the trenches are still open; b. After soil preparation, when plant materials are positioned and ready to plant; and, c. At final inspection, when all plant materials are installed and the irrigation system is fully operational.

15. Walls and Fences. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall submit and obtain approval from the Department of Community Development, Planning Division of a block wall/vinyl fence plan. At a minimum, this plan shall include the following items:
a. A six-foot high, decorative block wall around the easterly project boundary and along entry drives into the tract, and on all residential property lines where side or rear yards adjoin a public street.
b. Stone-wrapped pilasters at corners and every 100 feet of decorative block wall. c. Decorative block wall returns shall be provided between all residences. d. Six-foot high, UV protected vinyl fences on side and rear property lines interior to the project. As an alternative, interior wood fencing may be utilized subject to the following standards:
514
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 8 of 13
Conditions of Approval
i.12”x 12” minimum post holes filled with concrete, 2000 PSI Strength; ii.‘4”x 4” post not to exceed 8’ ft horizontally, 4”x 4” post shall be either treated lumber or redwood;
iii.A minimum of two horizontal supports provided every 8 ft supported by mechanical connection; and,
iv.Any variations proposed shall be approved by the Planning Manager and Building Official.

PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE

16. Community Open Space. The Master Land Use Plan contemplates development of a

5.0-acre neighborhood park (PA 19.A), a 14.8-acre community park (PA 19.B), an 18.0- acre community park (19.C), and 15.0 acres of landscape paseos. Park improvements will be developed as specified in the Specific Plan, but it is envisioned that the 5.0-acre neighborhood park and 14.8-acre community park will be constructed in the first phase of development. Upon completion they will be dedicated to the City of Perris, and annexed into the City’s Parks Maintenance District. Thereafter, they will be operated and maintained by the City of Perris.

17. Approval of Public Parks. An Administrative Development Plan Review for improvement of the 5.0-acre Neighborhood Park and 14.8-acre Community Park shall be approved prior to recordation of final subdivision maps, in accordance with the phasing schedule and procedures specified in the Development Agreement and these conditions of approval. Generally, the public parks shall be designed as illustrated in the Conceptual Park Plans (Specific Plan Exhibits 15, and 16). The neighborhood park will consist of basketball, volleyball, and tennis courts, and the 14.8-acre community park will include baseball and softball fields. Each facility will include a concessions/restroom building, lighting, picnic and BBQ areas, and vehicle parking. It is contemplated that the park amenities will be developer constructed with costs credited against park fees.

18. Landscape Maintenance District. The public parks (PA 19.A and 19.B) shall be annexed into the City of Perris Landscape Maintenance District. This shall occur prior to or concurrent with the recordation of each final map, or as otherwise set forth in the Development Agreement.

19. One Year Maintenance of Public Open Space. The applicant shall maintain all parks, parkways, medians, off-site drainage facilities not accepted by Riverside County Flood Control District, and irrigation systems within streets or otherwise annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District for a period of one year after construction. The applicant shall pay one year cash deposit to ensure maintenance for one year. After one year, these operations shall be accepted by the Landscape Maintenance District.

20. Installation of Plant Material. Landscaping and permanent irrigation facilities shall be installed with street improvements in accordance with the approved Specific Plan 515
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 9 of 13
Conditions of Approval
Amendment as they pertain to plant and irrigation standards. The applicant shall have appropriate right-of-way improvements, landscaping, street lighting and irrigation installed and in good working order prior to final release.

21. Content of Plans. Improvement plans shall conform to the concepts, features, and standards established in the Specific Plan Amendment and the conditions enumerated herein, and shall be prepared by a licensed landscaped architect.

All landscape and irrigation plans shall provide drought resistant and/or native vegetation as feasible, automatic irrigation systems which minimize runoff, and a separate irrigation system for the conveyance and distribution of reclaimed water where feasible, and in accordance with Administrative Regulations of the State of California.

22. Reclaimed Water. All landscaping within designated Open Space areas shall be irrigated with reclaimed water, if available and appropriate for use, and shall include dual automatic irrigation system (separate systems for trees and lawns), as approved by City and EMWD.

If reclaimed water is not available at the project site upon issuance of the first building permit, this condition shall not apply.

UTILITIES

23. Undergrounding. All utilities such as Cable TV, telephone, and electrical distribution lines (including those which provide direct service to the project site and/or currently exist along public right-of-ways) adjacent to the site shall be placed underground. All underground utilities along with future stub-outs located within street right-of-ways shall be installed prior to final paving.

24. Screening of Above-Ground Facilities. Any above-ground utility service areas and enclosures that are installed on-site in conjunction with this project shall be screened from view with landscaping, decorative barriers, and/or noise attenuation treatments, as approved by the Planning Department.

25. Plan of Services. The Specific Plan Amendment shall conform to the Eastern Municipal Water District’s Plan of Services letter dated June 9, 2004 (attached).

26. Water and Sewage Facilities. Water and sewage facilities shall be installed according to City of Perris and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) requirements at no cost to the City. Developer shall pay all applicable EMWD fees for services. The project shall participate on a fee basis in any sewage sludge disposal infrastructure reuse program instituted by the EMWD.

27. Required Right of Way. Any project-related off-site construction pertaining to drainage, underground utilities, and street improvements must have necessary right-ofway and agency approvals, (i.e. City, Flood Control, EMWD) at no cost to the City. To the extent that any such rights-of-way are not within the scope of the Specific Plan 516
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 10 of 13
Conditions of Approval
boundaries, the applicant shall be entitled to include acquisition costs of such rights-ofway for reimbursement in any Community Facilities District or similar financing method which does not impose any repayment obligation on the City of Perris.

28. Waste Management. The developer shall adhere to the City of Perris waste management and recycling plans, and shall only use the City-approved waste hauler for all construction and other waste disposal.

HYDROLOGY AND FLOOD CONTROL

29. San Jacinto River Plan. Drainage and flood control facilities shall be installed in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Master Plan, the City of Perris requirements and standards, and the San Jacinto River Plan. The plan will be prepared in accordance with the requirements of the San Jacinto River Flood Control project and the Army Corps of Engineers 404 permit for said project. The developer shall demonstrate compliance with this condition by obtaining a written statement from the Riverside County Flood Control District, in a form satisfactory to the City.

30. 10-Year and 100-Year Storm Events. Drainage and flood control facilities shall be designed in accordance with City of Perris and Riverside County Flood Control District design standards to provide protection from the 100-year storm event. The 10-year storm flow shall be contained within the curb, and the 100-year storm flow shall be contained within the street right-of-way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities shall be installed.

31. Pad Elevation. All pads created within the Specific Plan Area shall be designed to have an elevation at least one foot above the 100 year flood plain.

32. Construction of Storm Water Facilities. The proposed storm drain facilities shown in Exhibits 24 and 25 of the Specific Plan Amendment shall be constructed, as approved by the City Engineer. Construction of off-site drainage channels may also be required.

33. Timing of Construction. Flood control facilities within each building phase shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with the initial development within that building phase. They shall be operational prior to occupancy of the first unit in such phase. The applicant shall provide for on-site storm drain pipes and catch basins to convey the major runoff, in addition to mitigation of the nuisance runoff.

34. Maintenance of Storm Water Facilities. Drainage and storm drain facilities shall be maintained by the City of Perris. Maintenance responsibilities of the drainage and storm drain facilities shall be established prior to the recording of final maps for the development of the Specific Plan area.

35. Perpetuate Existing Grade. The property’s street and lot grading shall perpetuate the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area. No ponding or concentration of water to upstream and downstream properties shall be permitted. 517
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 11 of 13
Conditions of Approval

36. Storm Water Pollution Prevention. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit Grading Plans to the City Engineer, demonstrating compliance with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System requirements. The plans shall include a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan detailing water quality management controls and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control pollutant runoff. The applicant shall identify measures specified in Supplement A of the Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plans New Development Guidelines or other equally effective standard for BMPs, assignment of long-term maintenance responsibilities (specifying the developer, parcel owner, lessee, etc.) and shall reference the location(s) of structural BMPs

CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES

37. Approved Hours. Construction activity and equipment maintenance is limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Construction may not occur on Sundays or State holidays, without prior consent of the Building Official. Nonnoise generating activities (e.g., interior painting) are not subject to these restrictions.

38. Noise Attenuation. Stationary construction equipment that generates noise in excess of 65 dBA at the project boundaries must be shielded and located at least 100 feet from occupied residences. An equipment area with appropriate acoustic shielding shall be designated on building and grading plans. To the extent feasible, equipment and shielding shall remain in the designated location throughout construction.

39. Truck Routes. Construction routes are limited to City of Perris designated truck routes.

Route plans must include approved construction hours and be given to all subcontractors.

40. Dust Reduction. Water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used during clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour.

41. Dust Monitor. A person or persons shall be designated to monitor the dust control program and to order increased watering as necessary to prevent transport of dust off-site.

The name and telephone number of such persons shall be provided to the City.

42. Fencing. A six-foot temporary chain link fence is required along the perimeter of each phase during construction. The fence shall limit access between Planning Areas and restrict access onto roadways to those shown on individual tract maps.

43. Site Maintenance. All public streets affected by construction must be maintained on a daily basis during construction. Maintenance shall include dust control, street sweeping, interim paving and patching, and similar street maintenance procedures. A cash deposit of an amount to be determined by the City Engineer to guarantee maintenance of all 518
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 12 of 13
Conditions of Approval
public right-of-ways must be posted, prior to issuance of grading permits and shall remain on deposit for a period of 90 days following completion of construction.

SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

44. Tract Identification. Provide community entry statements, including theme walls, monumentation and enhanced landscaping at each entrance to the tract. Theme walls and monuments shall not occur within the public right-of-way. Tract Identification shall be subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Department and shall be consistent with the Parkwest Specific Plan as amended.

45. Unit Identification. Each unit in the tract shall include a lighted address fixture. This fixture shall allow for replacement of the bulbs, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Planning and Community Development and the Police Department.

46. Administrative Development Plan Review. After recordation of any Final Map and prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain approval of an Administrative Development Plan Review (ADPR) for the architecture, plotting, conceptual landscape and fencing of all production units within the tract. The ADPR must also indicate street furnishing details such as mailbox stand details, benches, bollards, bus stop enclosures, and lighting standards. These details shall be consistent with Section 3.0 of the amended Specific Plan. The applicant shall provide one singlestory product type which shall be plotted on at least 50 percent of street corners and at regular intervals throughout the tract (i.e., every fourth or fifth unit). Side entry garages are encouraged and shall be incorporated as feasible and as approved through the development plan review process. Also, the majority of units in the tract (other than corner lots) shall locate the wider side yard and the curb-cut/driveway on the same side of the lot. This is to provide opportunities for RV parking and generally improved access to rear yards.

47. Phasing. Any Phasing Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and the City Engineer. Each Phase of the project shall provide adequate drainage and at least two points of access to all lots. A phasing plan shall be submitted with the Administrative Development Plan Review application.

48. Window Treatments. All facades abutting a public street, tract boundary, or a downhill slope having an elevation change in excess of 20 feet shall provide elevation enhancements including window treatments such as shutters, awnings, or similar on the facade.

49. Mechanical Equipment. All mechanical equipment, including air conditioning units, pool equipment, etc., shall be screened from the public right-of-way by a view obscuring fence, wall, or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Division.

50. Spark Arresters. All spark arresters in the proposed tract shall be screened by sheet metal enclosures, or other material acceptable to the Building Official, and painted the according to the approved paint palette.
519
Parkwest Specific Plan Amendment 03-0288 January 30, 2007 TTM 31157 (03-0019) Page 13 of 13
Conditions of Approval

51. Energy Conservation. To improve local air quality, the applicant shall incorporate the following energy-conservation features into the project (as feasible):
a. Low NOx water heaters per specifications in the Air Quality Attainment Plan; b. Heat transfer modules in furnaces;
c. Light colored water-based paint and roofing materials; d. Passive solar cooling/heating; and,
e. Energy efficient appliances and lighting.

52. Street Paving. Public streets in each tract, planning area, or phase of development shall be paved and accessible prior to the issuance of building permits for the first production unit.

53. Setbacks. The minimum setbacks shall be as set forth in the Parkwest Specific Plan as amended.

54. Disclosure Statements. The developer shall record a disclosure on each unit and provide a disclosure to the purchaser of each unit indicating that the project is within a dam inundation area and is subject to flooding in the event of a dam failure, The disclosure shall also indicate the potential noise impacts from March Air Reserve Base. The developer shall provide an acknowledgement of the disclosure by each purchaser to the City, and each disclosure shall be included on the Final Map prior to recordation.

55. Indemnification/Hold Harmless. The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body. City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action.

56. Development Agreement. In the event City and the developer enter into a development agreement and if there are conflicts between the provisions of said agreement and the above conditions, the development agreement shall prevail.

57. Mitigation Measures. The applicant shall be responsible for imposing Mitigation Measures as indicated in approved Mitigated Negative Declaration (2220).

APPROVAL DATE PROJECT PLANNER
520

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
P8-695
November 29, 2005, Revised April 3, 2006, Revised Planning Commission Meeting December 6, 2006
Parkwest Specific Plan (Phase I) & Tr. 31157
With respect to the Conditions of Approval for the above referenced project, the City of Perris requires that the land divider provide the following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with the City of Perris Municipal Code Title 18. It is understood that the Site Plan tentative map and specific plan correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways and drainage courses with appropriate Q’s and that their omission may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complimentary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvements. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the City Engineers’ office. In case of conflict between these conditions, the recommendations of traffic engineer and the specific plans, the most stringent condition in the opinion of City shall apply:

1. Drainage and flood control facilities and improvements shall be installed in accordance with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Master Plan and the City of Perris requirements and standards and in conformance with “San Jacinto River Plan” (the plan), the requirements stated in Flood Control letter and the resolution # 3403. The following drainage related conditions are the minimum requirements of this project:
a. Final drainage and hydraulic reports to support the project design shall be submitted to meet Riverside County Flood Control criteria and the plan. These reports shall be reviewed and approved by RCFC and City of Perris.

CITY OF PERRIS

DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
170 WILKERSON AVE., SUITE D, PERRIS, CA 92570-2200
TEL.: (951) 943-6504 FAX: (951) 943-8416

HABIB MOTLAGH, CITY ENGINEER
521
b. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way if required shall be constructed within minimum of 20’ dedicated drainage easements. Drainage easement shall not straddle lot lines and shall be improved with Turf-Block or other materials as approved by City Engineer.
c. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100-year storm flows with emergency escape pursuant to RCFC Standards. Catch basin(s) within sump
condition shall be oversized.
d. The property’s street and lot grading shall be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area. No ponding or
concentration of water to upstream and downstream properties shall be permitted. Grading and erosion maintenance bonds shall be posted prior to issuance of any permit or map recordation, and the developer shall guarantee maintenance agreement between City and Developers shall be shall be to guarantee the maintenance of mass graded and finished graded areas by entering into an agreement with the City shall be provided. e. Portions of the site is located within Floodway and Flood Plain.

Prior to issuance of any grading and occupancy permits, CLOMR prior to issuance of grading permit and LOMR shall be obtained as required prior to issuance of building permits.
f. Drainage easements shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the City for review prior to its recordation. g. In the event the 100-year and 10-Year storms cannot be maintained within street right-of-way and curb-to-curb, all drainage facilities with exception of nuisance drainage improvements as indicated below shall be designed to convey the 100-year storm runoff. To eliminate nuisance runoff from cross gutters, minimum 18” storm drain and catch basins shall be installed and connected to proposed and/or existing storm drain facilities as shown on tentative map and at the following intersections:
• At all intersections (all corners as needed) adjacent to proposed storm drain.
• Evans Road Intersection with Nuevo Avenue.
• Intersection of “KK” with most easterly north/south road. • Intersection of “N” and “L” Streets.
• In the event grading, as proposed on tentative map is revised, the need for additional catch basins and storm drain will be required during plan check.
522
• Future sub-divisions of Phases 2 and beyond will be
conditioned accordingly.
h. All grading and drainage improvements shall comply with NPDES and Best Management Practices. Erosion control plans, WQMP, shall be prepared and submitted to Water Quality Board and the City as part of the grading plans.
i. Prior to start of the design of any master planned facilities, the applicant shall contact RCFC to determine the rules and regulations for drainage credit.
j. Minimum slope for drainage pipes shall be 0.30% and box culverts shall not be smaller than 4’ in height.
k. Any excavation within Floodway shall correspond to the requirements of Riverside County Flood Control and in conjunction with the river plan. The basin(s) shall be maintained by the applicant and appropriate maintenance agreements and bonds shall be posted and filed with the City.
l. A detailed hydrology report and hydraulic calculation shall be submitted to the City and Flood Control for review and approval.

The report shall address the offsite flow, accumulative onsite runoff and the impact to adjacent downstream and upstream properties.
m. Encroachment permit from RCFC and other appropriate
environmental agencies shall be secured for any work within Perris Valley Channel. Additional right-of-way along Perris Valley Channel shall be dedicated pursuant to adopted master plan. n. Line “Q” along Nuevo and from its terminus point shall be extended and connected to Perris Valley Channel pursuant to the adopted Master Plan.

2. 132’ right of way along Evans Road from Nuevo Road to Perris Valley Channel (within project boundaries) shall be dedicated. Evans Road from Nuevo Road to “B” Street shall be improved with curb, gutter located 46’ 47’ on either side of centerline, 14’ landscaped median and 8’ mandatory meandering sidewalk. The traffic index for Evans Road is 11.0. The median shall be designed and constructed with small drainage pipe and area drains to collect irrigation runoff and convey to proposed storm drain facilities.

3. All interior streets shall be improved with concrete curb, gutter, and paving located 20’ and 18’ from either side of centerline located within 60’ and 56’ full width dedicated right-of-way as shown on the map. 523

4. Streetlights shall be installed along all interior and exterior streets as approved by City Engineer per Riverside County and Southern California Edison standards.

5. Minimum 6’ wide concrete sidewalk shall be installed throughout this project with exception of Evans Road and Nuevo Road, which shall be 8’ meandering sidewalk.

6. The proposed development is in the service area of Eastern Municipal Water District. The applicant shall provide water and sewer facilities to this development and comply with EMWD, Fire Department, and Health Department’s requirements. In the event reclaimed water is not available to the site, the applicant shall investigate the use of installing irrigation well(s) for the use of irrigating the open spaces and the landscape areas. Irrigation well, if installed, shall be maintained by City through annexation to Landscape District.

7. Prior to issuance of any building permit or recordation of final map, the developer shall sign the consent and waiver forms to join the landscaping, flood control, street maintenance and lighting districts.

The developer shall maintain the landscaping for a period of one year after acceptance of these improvements and pay the 18-months advanced energy charges for streetlights. All storm drain facilities, catch basins, clarifiers, channels, pipes (non master planned facilities), onsite streets, signals, and irrigation well, shall be annexed to City’s Maintenance Districts.

8. Existing power poles fronting this site shall be undergrounded.

9. On and off-site street, drainage, water, sewer, striping, signing, street lighting, signal and grading plans along with hydrology and hydraulic reports shall be submitted to City Engineer’s office for review and approval.

10. Access shall be restricted along Evans Road, Nuevo, Dunlap, “A”, “B”, and “C”, except as shown on tentative map and so noted on the final map. Future access for park and school sites shall be reviewed and approved by City.

11. Any work within Riverside County shall require issuance of an encroachment permit.

12. The improvements conditioned for this project shall be coordinated with adjacent projects.

13. Intersections of Evans Road with Nuevo shall be constructed in a manner to convey the 100-year storm runoff under the road. 524

14. TUMF, DIF and CAP Fee and other credits and reimbursement as appropriate and approved by WRCOG and City of Perris shall be provided for any facilities qualified unless otherwise stated in these conditions.

15. Utilization of existing pavement beyond tract boundaries in lieu of new pavement as conditioned above may be permitted if approved by City Engineer.

16. “B” Street from Evans Road to San Jacinto Avenue shall be improved with minimum of 30’ paving within dedicated right-of-way including streetlights as determined by City Engineer.

17. “A” Street from Evans Road to “C” Street along both sides shall be improved with curb, gutter located 22’ from centerline within 66’ dedicated right-of-way.

18. “C” Street from “A” to Dunlap Drive shall be improved along both sides with curb and gutter located 20’ on either side of centerline within 60’ dedicated right-of-way.

19. Dunlap Drive from “C” Street to Nuevo shall be improved with minimum of 30’ paving within dedicated right-of-way.

20. San Jacinto Avenue from Dunlap Drive to Wilson Avenue shall be improved with minimum of 30’ new paving. The existing pavement along San Jacinto Avenue may be utilized if in the opinion of City Engineer is adequate or grind/overlay as determined by City Engineer.

21. Nuevo Road adjacent to this project shall be improved along both sides to provide for minimum 27’ 45’ of new pavement along south side and curb and gutter located 46’ 47’ south of centerline, 7’ wide landscape within 64’ ½ width dedicated right-of-way. Minimum of 2 – 12’ wide west bound lanes and one 12’ wide left turn lane along the north side of median shall also be installed within dedicated right of way.

Nuevo Road from Evans Road to Wilson Avenue shall be improved to provide for 2 – 12’ wide eastbound lanes, 2 – 12’ wide westbound lanes and a 12’ wide continuous left turn pocket.

22. Prior to issuance of any occupancy permits, traffic signals shall be installed at intersection of Evans and Nuevo Road, Nuevo and Murrieta Road, Redlands and San Jacinto Avenue, and I-215 and 4th Street Interchange as shown on Exhibit 1-B of traffic report prepared by Urban Crossroads.
525

23. All existing and proposed intersections to be widened at minimum to comply with above conditions and those shown on Exhibit 1-C of Urban Crossroads traffic report.

24. All landscape slopes along the street right-of-ways shall be maximum 3:1 or combination of split wall/free standing wall shall be required.

25. Traffic calming improvements such as landscape median, chokers, striping, raised pavers, as determined by City shall be implemented throughout the project including “A”, “B”, and “C” Streets as determined by City.

26. Prior to issuance of 150th occupancy permit, the project shall construct or cause the construction of 100-year bridge at Nuevo and Perris Valley Channel to ultimate general plan circulation element (both sides).

27. In the event the City of Perris is participating with the ongoing “Ramona Mobility” transportation development fee and its implementations, this project shall be required to pay its fair share as determined by City. This condition shall remain with the specific plan and shall include future phases.

28. Also, In the event the City establishes a road and bridge benefit or other financing tools to construct the ultimate interchange at I-215 and 4th Street, the project shall be required to pay its fair share. This condition shall remain with the specific plan and shall include future phases.

29. In the event City and the developer enter into a development agreement and if there are conflicts between the provisions of said agreement and the above conditions, the agreement shall prevail.

Habib Motlagh
Habib Motlagh
City Engineer
526

CITY OF PERRIS

COMMUNITY SERVICES
227 North “D” Street, Perris, CA 92570 Tel: (951) 435-7220 www.cityofperris.org MEMO
Date: July 21, 2026
To: Rafael Garcia, Principal Planner
From: Arcenio Ramirez, Director of Parks and Community Services Cc: Arturo Garcia, Parks Services Manager
Joshua Estrada, Parks Supervisor
Jose Mier, Parks Coordinator
Subject: PLN24-05025-Final Tract Map 31157 FINAL TRACT MAP 31157 SOUTH OF NUEVO RD. NORTH OF SAN JACINTO AVE. WEST OF DUNLAP DR. EAST OF PERRIS VALLEY STORM DRAIN, TTM 31157, APN: 310-180- 008, 016, 020, 021, 055, 061, 062, 063, 310-190-025.

Applicant: PW Land Investments, LP- Jason Keller.

Community Services Staff reviewed PLN24-05025-Final Tract Map 31157 and offer the following condition(s):

Development Impact Fees
☒ The Project is subject to payment of Residential Park Development Impact Fees. ☐ The Project is subject to payment of Industrial Park Development Impact Fees. ☐ This Project is subject to payment of Public Art Development Impact Fees.

Special Districts
☒ The project shall annex into the Community Facilities District No. 2018-02 (Public Services)
Additional Comments
As approved by City Council on February 27, 2024. In accordance with the approved Improvement and Credit Agreement for the Development Fee Program for Park Improvements, the Developer shall be responsible for the construction and payment of all 527

CITY OF PERRIS

COMMUNITY SERVICES
227 North “D” Street, Perris, CA 92570 Tel: (951) 435-7220 www.cityofperris.org park improvements, as shown on the conceptual park plan (Attachment 1). The City will provide a credit against the Developer's Park Development Impact Fee (DIF) obligation to offset the verified costs of constructing the park improvements, for an amount not to exceed $10,081,481. The Developer is responsible for approximately $2,371,500 in Park DIF fees for the 527 single family residential units proposed in Phase 1 and will be responsible for the remaining Park DIF fees for future Phase 2 tracts (934 residential units), currently estimated at $8,471,744 ($9,070.39 Park DIF rate), to complete the park improvements. Construction of the park improvements shall commence prior to the issuance of the 400th building permit for Tract Map 31157 and shall be completed prior to the issuance of the 500th building permit for Tract Map 31157. 528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579

CITY OF PERRIS

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA SUBMITTAL

10.K.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

MEETING DATE: September 29, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Final Financing Parcel Map 26-00002 (FPM 38811) – Approval of Final Financing Parcel Map No. 38811 to subdivide approximately 197.28 net acres into 4 lots to allow for the sale of the properties associated with the Harvest Landing Specific Plan located north of Walmart Center Drive, south of Orange Avenue, east of Frontage Road, and west of North Perris Boulevard. Applicant: HIP SoCal Properties, LLC
REQUESTED ACTION: Approve Final Financing Parcel Map 26-00002 (FPM 38811) and authorize the Mayor to sign the subdivision map.

CONTACT: Kenneth Phung, Director of Development Services On February 10, 2026, the City Council by a 3-2 vote (Yes – Mayor Vargas, Corona, and Rabb; No – Nava and Vallejo), approved a comprehensive update to the Harvest Landing Specific Plan to include entitlement of a 428,507-square-foot commercial shopping center, a 391,725-square-foot parcel hub, and construction of a 16.5-acre Sports Park. The approval included a Tentative Parcel Map 38811 (TTM24-05198) to subdivide approximately 197.28 net acres into 4 parcels to align with the configuration of the shopping center, parcel hub, and remaining parcels to facilitate the development, located south of Orange Avenue.

The applicant now requests approval of the Final Financing Parcel Map to create the 4 parcels to allow for the sale of the commercial shopping center site and parcel hub site for development, with buyers ready to acquire the property and begin construction as soon as the infrastructure plans are approved.

Thus far, the applicant has begun submitting plans for off-site construction and has made the $2,000,000 payment to fund the First-Time Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance Program, satisfying the requirement in Section 4.6 of the Harvest Landing Development Agreement before the deadline of August 12, 2026.

Development Services and Engineering Departments have determined that the final map complies with the Subdivision Map Act and applicable provisions of the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, the City .
580
BUDGET (or FISCAL) IMPACT:

Engineer recommends approval of Final Financing Parcel Map No. 38811.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve Final Financing Parcel Map 26-00002 (FPM 38811) for sale/conveyance purposes.

There is no fiscal impact associated with this Project since all project costs are borne by the applicant.

Prepared By: Nathan Perez, Senior Planner
Attachments:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Approved Site Plan (For Informational Purposes)

3. Final Financing Parcel Map No. 38811

4. Conditions of Approval (Planning, Engineering, Public Works, Community Services, and Building & Safety)

5. City Council Staff Report without Attachments - Dated February 10, 2026 581
ATTACHMENT 1
Vicinity Map
582
LOUIS B. MAYER CIR

SPECTACULAR BID ST

NUEVO RD

AUTUMN CT

FLAME AVE

HARVILL AVE

MEDICAL CENTER DR

SUNDOWN DR

RUBY DR

CHERRYTREE DR

SPRINGTREE DR

GALLANT FOX ST

WHIRLAWAY ST HALMA CT

CHANT ST

CAMDEN CT

PEPPERTREE DR WINDSOR CT
I-215 NBOFF

WEBSTER AVE

AVOCADO AVEPEACHTREE DR

BOLD VENTURE ST

WORTH ST

BOLD FORBES CT

RIVA RIDGE ST

PLACENTIA AVE

SPOKANE ST

OWENBY DR

W W FRONTAGE RD

E E FRONTAGE RD
I-215

APPLETREE DR

SUSAN LN

FERDINAND CT

CANNONADE CT PLAUDIT CT

GRAINFIELD LN

PINETREE DR

BARRETT AVE
I-215 SBON

FIREBRAND AVE

HART LN

BROKERS TIP CT

AMBER WAY

TURQUIOSE DR

SUNSET AVE

JAN-ROY LN

EVERGREEN PL

GALILEO LN

DAYTONA CV RHODES AVE

JOHNSTON ST

SUNNY HALO CT

POOLEY DR

INDIAN ST

SUMMERTREE DR

JOHNSON AVE

JAN-ROY DR

CITRUS AVE

EMERALD WAY

PERRIS BLVD
A ST

ARNOLD AVE

PLACENTIA ST

ORANGE AVE

LEMON AVE

WATER ST
I-215 SBOFF
I-215 NBON
Vicinity/Aerial Map
Nearmap
KEY
Perris Boundary
Project Site
0 500 1,000 2,000 ft
0 170 340 680 m
1:14,742
County
of
Riverside
583
ATTACHMENT 2
Approved Site Plan (For Information
Purposes)
584
Scale
Job No.

Date

HARVEST LANDING RETAIL CENTER & BUSINESS PARK

PERRIS, CA
2020-392
2026-01-29
1” = 200’
A1 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
0’
100’
200’
300’
400’
500’
600’
N
BLDG. 1

COMMERCIAL
RETAIL

WATER QUALITY
BASIN
‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ ‘E’ ‘F’ ‘G’
‘H’
‘J’
‘K’

BARRETT AVENUE BARRETT AVENUE

INDIAN AVENUE

ORANGE AVENUE

PERRIS BOULEVARD

FRONTAGE ROAD
INTERSTATE - 215
MBU
70 AC
PHASE 1
MBU
PHASE 2

40.42 AC
WATER

QUALITY
BASIN

12.91 AC

OVERLAY

10.66 AC
COMM

46.24 AC
PAD ‘8’
PAD ‘2’
PAD ‘3’
PAD ‘1’
PAD ‘4’
PAD ‘7’ PAD ‘6’ PAD ‘5’

HARVEST LANDING WAY
MBU

68.13 AC
FUTURE
PHASE 1

LAND USE AREAS

MBU (MULTIPLE BUSINESS USE)

COMM (COMMERCIAL)

RESIDENTIAL

SPORTS PARK

WATER QUALITY BASIN
ROADS

TOTAL SPA

OVERLAY

TOTAL WITH OVERLAY
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
178.55 AC

46.24 AC

49.8 AC

16.5 AC

12.91 AC

43.62 AC
347.62 AC

10.66 AC
358.28 AC
585
ATTACHMENT 3
Final Parcel Map No. 38811
586
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
587
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
588
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
589
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
590
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
591
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
592
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
593
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
594
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
595
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
596
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
597
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
598
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
PARCEL MAP NO. 38811-1
599
ATTACHMENT 4
Conditions of Approval
(Planning, Engineering, Public Works,
Community Services, and Building)
Due to the large file size, the documents are
available for viewing at the Planning Division
and on the City’s website at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/dev
elopment-services/planning/environmentaldocuments-for-public-review/-folder601#docfold_1206_1313_479_601 600
ATTACHMENT 5
City Council Staff Report without
Attachments – Dated February 10, 2026
601
MEETING DATE: February 10, 2026
SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment 24-05175, Specific Plan Amendment 22- 05250, Zone Change 24-05176, Development Agreement
Amendment 17-05136, Tentative Parcel Maps 22-05251 (TPM 38810) and 24-05198 (TPM 38811), Conditional Use Permits 22- 05005 and 23-05235, Development Plan Reviews 22-05239, 22- 05235, 22-00023, 22-00024, 22-00025, 23-00018, 24-00008, and 24- 00009 - A proposal to consider a comprehensive update to the Harvest Landing Specific Plan that originally consisted of commercial, industrial, and parcel hub uses, which has been modified by Alternative 4 of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR), to eliminate industrial warehouse uses and provide for a two-phased development consisting of Phase 1, including a 391,725-square-foot parcel hub facility on approximately 70 acres, a commercial shopping center totaling 428,507 square feet on approximately 46.49 acres, a 12.91- acre water quality basin, and approximately 78.76 acres designated as Multiple Business Uses (MBU) for future development; and Phase 2, including approximately 51.08 acres designated as MBU for future development north of Orange Avenue, with the residentially designated areas and the Harvest Landing Sports Park north of Orange Avenue remaining unchanged. The following entitlements are required:
1) General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation of approximately 16.20 acres north of the Project site from Light Agricultural (A1) and Public (P) to Harvest Landing Specific Plan;
2) Specific Plan Amendment to expand the boundaries by adding

16.20 acres to the north, and to establish development standards, design guidelines, and implementation/administration
provisions;
3) Zone Change to rezone approximately 5.64 acres in the northerly area of the Project site from A1 Zone to Specific Plan (SP) land use designation and to apply the MBU Overlay to 10.66 acres currently developed with the Val Verde Elementary School; 4) Development Agreement Amendment for specific project improvements/community benefits;
5) Tentative Parcel Maps to create parcels for the commercial and MBU development and consolidate parcels for future MBU
development;

CITY OF PERRIS

C I T Y C O U N C I L

A G E N D A S U B M I T T A L
602
6) Conditional Use Permits to allow two drive-thru restaurant businesses and a vehicle fueling station; and
7) Development Plan Reviews for review of site plans and building elevations.

Applicant: HIP SoCal Properties, LLC
REQUESTED ACTION: Adopt Resolution Number (next in order) certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH 2024080337)
identifying EIR Alternative 4 as the Project consisting of 428,507- square-foot commercial/retail center and a 391,725-square-foot Parcel Hub; and adopting the Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program, Statement Overriding Considerations, and Findings of Fact; and
Adopt Resolution Number (next in order) approving General Plan Amendment 24-05175; Specific Plan Amendment 22-05250;
Tentative Parcel Maps 22-05251 (TPM 38810) and 24-05198 (TPM 38811), Conditional Use Permits 22-05005 and 23-05235;
Development Plan Reviews 22-05239 and 23-00018 to facilitate the comprehensive update of the Harvest Landing Specific Plan and Phase 1 development, consisting of a 428,507-square-foot commercial/retail center, water quality/recreational basin, and parcel hub facility, as described in Alternative 4 of the Project EIR, with the modification to relocate the 391,725 square foot Parcel Hub to the southerly side of the site, subject to Conditions of Approval and findings contained herein; and
Introduce Ordinance Number (next in order) approving the 24- 05176 to rezone 5.54 acres in the northerly area of the Project site from Light Agricultural (AI) to Multiple Business Use (MBU), and to apply the MBU Overlay to 10.66 acres currently developed with the Val Verde Elementary School; and
Introduce Ordinance Number (next in order) approving
Development Agreement Amendment 17-05136 for specific project improvements and community benefits to facilitate the
comprehensive update of the Harvest Landing Specific Plan and Phase 1 development, including the 391,725 square foot Parcel Hub on 70 acres on the southerly side of the site, subject to Conditions of Approval and findings contained herein.

CONTACT: Kenneth Phung, Director of Development Services PROJECT BACKGROUND:

On December 17, 2025, the Planning Commission (PC) voted 3-1 with one recusal (Yes – Hammond, Shively, and Jimenez; No – Lopez, Recusal – Menez) to recommend that the City Council approve a comprehensive update of the Harvest Landing Specific Plan under Alternative 4 of the EIR to eliminate industrial warehouse uses and provide for a two-phased development 603
consisting of Phase 1, with an amendment to reduce the Parcel Hub square footage and lot size from 391,725-square-feet on 70 acres to 322,079 square feet on 59.37 acres, a commercial shopping center totaling 428,507 square feet on approximately 46.49 acres, a 12.91-acre water quality basin with open space amenities, and approximately 78.76 acres designated as Multiple Business Uses (MBU) for future development; and Phase 2, including approximately 51.08 acres designated as MBU for future development north of Orange Avenue, with the residentially designated areas and the Harvest Landing Sports Park north of Orange Avenue remaining unchanged.

The applicant has revised the site plan per the Planning Commission’s recommendation, except to reduce the Parcel Hub building and lotsize. Per the developer, a reduction of the parcel hub building by approximately 70,000 square feet would not make the building feasible for FedEx to occupy the building, and therefore, the overall project’s viability, including the commercial, would no longer be developable. Viability of the overall project depends on FedEx's occupancy of the Parcel Hub facility, which will fund much of the off-site infrastructure improvements and support the community benefits proposed with the project. Both the parcel hub and commercial center will be constructed at the same time and the sports complex will be constructed later in Phase 2. However, there will be passive recreational amenities in the water quality basin in Phase 1.

Below is the comparison of the Developer Original Project Proposal and the PC’s recommended proposal.

DEVELOPER LATEST UPDATED

PROPOSAL WITH

PC RECOMMENDATIONS, EXCEPT
PARCEL

HUB SIZE REDUCTION
(MODIFIED ALTERNATIVE 4)

PROJECT PROPOSAL AT PC
604
Planning Commission Recommendations to City Council
The PC recommended Alternative 4 proposal preserves residential land for up to 615 dwelling units and a 16.5-acre sports park, eliminates allowance of all industrial warehouse and distribution uses, allows only one Parcel Hub development for last mile delivery of goods, and commercial development for the remaining land uses, in a two-phased development consisting of:
• Phase 1 with the Planning Commission reducing the Parcel Hub square footage from 391,725 square feet to 322,079 square feet and lot acreage from 70 acres to approximately 59.37 acres, a commercial shopping center totaling 428,507 square feet on approximately 46.49 acres, a 12.91- acre water quality basin functioning partially as an outdoor open space gathering area that will be funded and maintained by the developer, and approximately 78.76 acres designated as Multiple Business Uses (MBU) for future development including but not limited to commercial and business park related uses; and
• Phase 2 with approximately 51.08 acres designated as MBU for future development, including but not limited to commercial and business park uses north of Orange Avenue, with the residentially designated areas and the Harvest Landing Sports Park north of Orange Avenue remaining unchanged.

During Planning Commission deliberations, a commissioner requested that the developer explore relocating the Parcel Hub closer to the freeway, rather than placing it across the street from future residential development and the 16.5 acres Sports Park. In response to this feedback, the applicant is proposing to relocate the Parcel Hub south, closer to the freeway, to create opportunities for other uses that would better complement the future residential development and sports park to the north. This amendment includes increasing the Parcel Hub square footage and lot size to 391,725 square feet on 70 acres instead of 322,079 square feet on 59.37 acres, as the developer indicated that the financial viability of the Project is dependent on FedEx's occupancy of the Parcel Hub facility.

The EIR has been updated to reflect this amendment.

Recommended Modified Alternative 4 Plan
Council is being asked to consider the developer proposed Modified Alternative 4, allowing a 391,725 square foot Parcel Hub Facility instead of the PC recommended 322,079 square foot parcel hub. The applicant isrequesting a larger building footprint and lot size to accommodate FedEx asthe end user, as FedEx hasidentified the need for the large building and lot area to meet operational requirements.

The applicant explained that the parcel hub’s size is needed to allow efficient on-site sorting and vehicle staging. Adequate space allows operations to be consolidated on site, while reducing the building or site area would constrain operations and could lead to more frequent and dispersed truck and van movements (Attachment 17).

The developer has indicated that the project’s financial viability is dependent on FedEx occupying the Parcel Hub facility. Without FedEx’s commitment, a reduced building and lot size would render the project unviable under the current community benefit terms. Originally, the developer had proposed 6 warehouses plus 4 million square feet of industrial in northerly portion of the specific plan, and a parcel hub. The developer has since removed all warehouses, leaving only the parcel hub 605
which FedEx has since then requested a larger facility in order to occupy this site. The following shows the original site plan, no longer proposed:

Previous Plan No Longer Proposed
Community Benefits
As part of the Project, the developer will provide the following community benefits through a 10- year Project Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval, with an estimated total value of approximately $35.5 million:
• Provide below-market commercial rental rates to attract top-tier tenants, with the approximate value of $24 million.
606
• Construct five public art installations in coordination with the City and the Historical Society, with an estimated value of $2.5 million.
• Build park amenities within the detention basin, including trails, exercise equipment, walkways, and community gathering areas, with an estimated value of $9 million. • Offer a relocation site for Val Verde Elementary School north of the Specific Plan, for which exclusive negotiations have begun.
• Coordinate a job fair to provide employment opportunities for City residents. • Maintain a lifetime partnership with the City for the annual Christmas Toy Drive. • Construct the 16-acre Harvest Landing Sports Park as part of Phase 2 development.

The community benefit terms are based on FedEx occupying the Parcel Hub facility, which includes the larger building, with 391,725 square feet and a 70-acre lot. Without the increase in square footage and lot size, the applicant has indicated that there is no Project viability to include the commercial shopping center component.

Val Verde Elementary School
Since the Planning Commission meeting, the site plan was revised to relocate the parcel hub further south away from the existing Val Verde Elementary School site. The operations of the parcel hub, such as traffic and circulation, will not affect the school site if it chooses to remain at their current location. Additionally, no warehouses are proposed near the school site. While there are on-going discussion between the developer and the school to purchase the land and relocate, the school can choose to remain at their current or relocate at any time in the future.

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:

Discussion
At the December 17, 2025, meeting, the Planning Commission expressed support and praised the proposed Phase 1 commercial component and recreational water quality basin. The Commission also supported eliminating all Phase 1 industrial warehouse buildings and prohibiting industrial warehouse and distribution uses within the Multiple Business Use (MBU) areas. The Commissioners raised concerns about the parcel hub’s size and proximity to future residential development north of Orange Avenue, noting potential exposure of sensitive receptors to emissions. The Commission recommended reducing the parcel hub size from 391,725 square feet to 322,079 square feet.

The Commission also considered the potential relocation of Val Verde Elementary School, which is located north of Orange Avenue within Phase 2 of the Project area. The applicant indicated ownership of a vacant site approximately 1.2 miles east of the Project area that could accommodate the school's relocation and stated that he is in negotiations with the School District. In response, the Commission recommended a Condition of Approval requiring that, if the school is relocated, the new school must be completed and operational before the existing school ceases operations, to ensure school employees have an opportunity to maintain their employment. Since the parcel hub has been moved, this condition no longer applies, and staff recommend removing it. 607
Compliance with Senate Bill 330 (No Net Loss of Housing) The Harvest Landing Specific Plan comprehensive update retains all underlying residential land uses originally established in the plan, ensuring that the project maintains its full housing potential. This approach allows residential development to proceed at the densities allowed under the underlying residential designations, if the commercial or parcel hub designation on the MBU parcel is no longer needed in the future. In doing so, the project complies with Senate Bill 330 (SB 330), which remains in effect until 2030 and prohibits local jurisdictions from adopting new laws that would reduce the allowable amount of new housing or create regulatory barriers that delay housing development. By preserving the underlying residential land uses, the project safeguards existing housing capacity while providing flexibility for future development consistent with state law.

Public Comment
A total of forty-six (46) individuals spoke at the Planning Commission meeting regarding this project. Of these, 28 individuals expressed support for the Project, including representatives of local organizations, business and interest groups, union representatives, and city residents, while 18 individuals spoke in opposition to the Project, including representatives of environmental groups, city residents, and residents of neighboring communities. Opponents of the Project expressed concerns that the parcel hub facility would function similarly to a large-scale warehouse.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

An Environmental Impact Report (SCH# 2024080337) has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Attachment 14). The EIR concludes that all project impacts have generally been reduced to less than significant or have been reduced to below the level of significance with the implementation of mitigation measures, except for impacts related to Air Quality, GHG emissions, Noise, and Transportation (VMT), which have been identified as significant and unavoidable. Thus, the adoption of a Statement of Overriding Consideration would be required to approve EIR Alternative 4, as recommended by the Planning Commission. During the public review period, staff received a total of 24 comment letters, six (6) of which were from the following agencies: CAL FIRE/Riverside County Fire; Riverside County Flood Control; Riverside Transit Agency; South Coast Air Quality Management District; Eastern Municipal Water District; and California Department of Transportation. Per Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, the City provided a written response to the commenting public agencies at least 10 days prior to the City Council's consideration of the Final EIR certification.

Responses to Comments were prepared and included in the Final EIR. None of the comments raised additional environmental concerns that were not already addressed in the EIR, constitute “significant new information” or meet any of the conditions in Section 15088.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines that would require recirculation of the EIR. In addition, an Errata was included in the Final EIR, setting forth clarifications, amplifications, corrections of typographical errors, and an analysis of the parcel hub relocation to the south of the site. Information included in Errata does not constitute “significant new information,” and no further recirculation is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15088.5.
608
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING:

A Notice of Public Hearing for the City Council meeting was published in the local newspaper and sent to agencies and property owners within 1,000 feet of the Project site, exceeding the 300- foot minimum requirement (Attachment 18). Since the writing of the Planning Commission staff report, staff has received approximately 500 emails in support of and eight (8) in opposition to the Project. Copies of the emails and letters are available at the City Clerk’s office and the Planning Division.

The comments in support cited the shopping opportunities to be provided by the Project’s commercial component and the increased employment opportunities. Comments in opposition raised concerns about the adequacy of the EIR and potential environmental impacts on biological resources, air quality, noise, traffic, and compatibility with sensitive receptors in adjacent and nearby areas. Opponents specifically objected to the inclusion of any warehouse use, frequently stating that they perceived little, if any, distinction between a parcel hub and a warehouse.

Additional concerns included the loss of recreational opportunities previously contemplated under the existing Specific Plan and skepticism regarding the applicant’s commitment to delivering the community benefits associated with Project development.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the Planning Commission’s recommendation with the proposed amendment to move the Parcel Hub facility south and closer to the freeway so that it is further away from the future residential development and Sports Park north of Orange Avenue, plus the addition of increasing the Parcel Hub facility square footage as the project financial viability is depending on FedEx occupancy the Parcel Hub facility. Without the increase in square footage and lot size, the applicant has indicated that there is no Project viability to include the commercial shopping center component. Therefore, staff recommends the following:

1. Adopt Resolution Number (next in order) certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2024080337), identifying EIR Alternative 4 as the Project, with the 391,725 square foot Parcel Hub on 70 acres, and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Findings of Fact;

2. Adopt Resolution Number (next in order) approving GPA 24-05175, SPA 22-05250, TPMs 22-05251 (TPM 38810) and 24-05198 (TPM 38811), CUPs 22-05005 and 23-05235, and DPRs 22-05239 and 23-00018; and

3. Introduce Ordinances Numbers (next in order) approving ZC 24-05176 and DAA 17-05136 to facilitate the comprehensive update of the Harvest Landing Specific Plan and Phase 1 development, subject to Conditions of Approval and findings contained herein.

BUDGET (or FISCAL) IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with this project since all project costs are borne by the Applicant.

Prepared by: Albert G. Armijo, Contract Project Planner Reviewed by: Patricia Brenes, Planning Manager
609
REVIEWED BY:

Assistant City Manager:

Assistant City Manager:___________
Director of Finance:___________
Attachments:

1. Resolution Number (next in order) Certifying the Environmental Impact Report Alternative 4 Project that includes a 391,725 square foot parcel hub in the southerly area, and Adopting the Statement of Overriding Considerations, Findings of Fact, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Due to the size of the file, only the Resolution is included as a hard copy; the Attachments are available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

2. Resolution Number (next in order) Approving General Plan Amendment 24-05175, Specific Plan Amendment 22-05250, Tentative Parcel Maps 22-05251 (TPM 38810) and 24-05198 (TPM 38811), Conditional Use Permits 22-05005 and 23-05235, and Development Plan Reviews 22-05239 and 23-00018, that includes a 391,725 square foot parcel hub in the southerly area, and Conditions of Approval (Planning, Engineering, Public Works, Community Services, and Building & Safety

3. Ordinance Number (next in order) Approving Development Agreement Amendment 17-05136 for the Harvest Landing Project, that includes a 391,725 square foot parcel hub in the southerly area
Due to the size of the file, only the Ordinance is included as a hard copy; the Attachments are available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

4. Ordinance Number (next in order) Approving Zoning Change 24-05176 for a project with a 391,725 square foot parcel hub in the southerly area Due to the size of the file, only the Ordinance is included as a hard copy; the Attachments are available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

5. Vicinity/Aerial Map

6. Existing and Proposed Specific Plan Land Use Map

7. Harvest Landing Specific Plan document
Due to the size of this file, the document is available in the Planning Division and online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528 610

8. MARB/IPA ALUCP Map

9. Tentative Parcel Maps 38810 and 38811

10. Project Plans
a. Project including Reduced Parcel Hub Facility (Overall Site Plans, Floor Plans, Building Elevations, and Conceptual Landscape Plans, and Renderings)
b. Project Plans including Large Parcel Hub Facility (Overall Site Plans, Floor Plans, Building Elevations, and Conceptual Landscape Plans, and Renderings)
Due to the size of the plans, only select plans are provided in the staff report package; the complete set of plans is on file with the Planning Division and available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

11. Harvest Landing Specific Plan Final EIR (Errata, Public Comments, and Responses to Comments) and Technical Reports
Due to the size of the files; the documents are on file with the Planning Department and available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

12. Public Comment Letters
Due to the size of the files, the public comment letters are on file with the Planning Division and available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

13. Planning Commission Staff Report Without Exhibits – Dated 12/17/2025.

Due to the size of the files, only the staff report is included as a hard copy. The staff report and exhibits are available online at:
https://www.cityofperris.org/departments/developmentservices/planning/environmental-documents-for-public-review/-folder528#docfold_1206_1313_479_528

14. Applicant’s Letter Requesting Council consideration to allow a larger Parcel Hub Facility, instead of PC Recommendation

15. Notice of Public Hearing
Consent:

Public Hearing: X
Business Item:

Presentation:

Other
611

CITY OF PERRIS

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA SUBMITTAL

10.L.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

MEETING DATE: September 29, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration to approve Professional Services Agreement with Hushmand Associates, Inc., for compaction and asphalt and concrete material testing services for the Perris Boulevard and Nuevo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP S157) and Public Works Parking Lot Project (F076), in the amount of $177,997.50, for a 200-day contract term.

REQUESTED ACTION:

That the City Council:

Approve Professional Services Agreement with Hushmand
Associates, Inc., for compaction and asphalt and concrete material testing services for the Perris Boulevard and Nuevo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP S157) and Public Works Parking Lot Project (F076), in the amount of $177,997.50, for a 200-day contract term;
Authorize a 20% of the contract amount for contingency in the amount of $35,599.50; and
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement, approved as to form by City Attorney.

CONTACT: John Pourkazemi, City Engineer
The City Council at its meeting of July 28, 2026, approved the Public Works Construction Contract to All American Asphalt for the Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Project and the Public Works Parking Lot Improvement Project (CIP S157 and CIP F076) (Project). The Project is scheduled to start by late September 2026.

The Project requires independent Soils Engineer for compaction and asphalt and concrete material testing. To secure a qualified independent Soils Engineering firm, Engineering Department requested proposals from qualified firms, receiving proposals from the following companies:
.
612
BUDGET (or FISCAL) IMPACT:

Firm Proposal
Hushmand Associates, Inc. $177,997.50
LOR Geotechnical Group, Inc. $185,099.50
Willdan $235,852.50
Selection was based on cost and the lowest proposal was received from Hushmand Associates, Inc., in the amount of $177,997.50.

Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Approve Professional Services Agreement with Hushmand Associates, Inc., for compaction and asphalt and concrete material testing services for the Perris Boulevard and Nuevo Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (CIP S157) and Public Works Parking Lot Project (F076), in the amount of $177,997.50, for a 200-day contract term.; 2) Authorize a 20% of the contract amount for contingency in the amount of $35,599.50; and 3) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Professional Services Agreement, approved as to form by City Attorney.

Project Funding is included in the current CIP S157 and F076.

Prepared By: Grace Alvarez, Management Analyst (Contractor) Attachments:

1. HAI-Professional Services Agreement.pdf
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637

CITY OF PERRIS

CITY COUNCIL

AGENDA SUBMITTAL

10.M.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

MEETING DATE: September 29, 2026
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, for Environmental and Design Engineering Services for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement and Widening over the San Jacinto River (CIP S160), in the amount of $1,812,224.00, for a four (4) year contract term.

REQUESTED ACTION:

That the City Council:

Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Albert A. Webb Associates, for Environmental and Design Engineering Services for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement and Widening over the San Jacinto River (CIP S160), in the amount of $1,812,224.00, for a four (4) year contract term; and
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement, approved as to form by City Attorney.

CONTACT: John Pourkazemi, City Engineer
Currently, the Goetz Road Bridge over the San Jacinto River is a two-lane facility (one lane of travel in each direction), built in 1970. The roadway has a General Plan designation of Primary Arterial, with a roadway cross section of three lanes in each direction and a center median. However, based on the projected build-out conditions, Goetz Road Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 13,300 and the roadway designation would be Secondary Arterial, consisting of two lanes in each direction with a center median. A Secondary Arterial is capable of handling up to 21,540 ADT.

Therefore, staff prepared the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the Environmental and Engineering Services (Project) for a Consultant to obtain the associated environmental permits, coordinate with respective agencies and provide the design for a 4-lane bridge, approximately 80 feet wide, to accommodate two 12-foot-wide northbound lanes, two 12-foot wide southbound lanes, a 4-foot wide striped median, two 10-foot wide multipurpose trails separated by 2-foot wide concrete barriers, guard rails and street lights.
.
638
BUDGET (or FISCAL) IMPACT:

IDI Logistics, the developer of the logistic sites on Mapes Road, was conditioned to pay $22M for the environmental clearance, design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of the Project in three installments of $5M, $8.5M, a final $8.5M totaling $22M, with the City assuming the responsibility as the lead agency for the Project. The first installment of $5M has been received and has been allocated in the Project’s Capital Improvement Program CIP S160. Therefore, on April 30, 2026, the City advertised a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Phase 1 of the Project, to perform the Environmental and Permitting Services, and for Phase 2 of the Project to provide the Bridge Design Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates. Five proposals were received on the due date of June 10, 2026 from:
– ARC Riverside
– Dokken Engineering
– Albert A. Webb Associates
– EXP Services
– CNS Engineering
Staff reviewed all five qualified proposals, scoring and ranking them in accordance to the RFP.

Consultant selection was based on qualification resulting in the recommendation to award the contract to Albert A. Webb Associates in the amount of $989,474.00 for the Environmental and Permitting Services (Phase 1), and $822,750.00 for the Bridge Design Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates (Phase 2), for a combined contract amount of $1,812,224.00, for a four-year contract term.

Staff recommends that the City Council 1) Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Albert A.

Webb Associates for Environmental and Design Engineering Services for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement and Widening over the San Jacinto River (CIP S160), in the amount of $1,812,224.00, for a four (4) year contract term; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement, approved as to form by City Attorney.

There is no impact to General Fund. Project Funding is available in CIP S160.

Prepared By: Enrique Najera, Managers Assistant
Attachments:

1. Vicinity Map.pdf

2. Professional Services Agreement.pdf

3. Cost Proposal.pdf

4. Technical Proposal.pdf
639
ATTACHMENT 1

VICINITY MAP
640
Vicinity Map
Goetz Road Bridge GOETZ ROAD

ETHANAC ROAD
LEGEND

LOCATION OF GOETZ

ROAD BRIDGE
641
ATTACHMENT 2

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
642
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -1-

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

BETWEEN CITY OF PERRIS AND
ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 29th day of September, 2026 by and between CITY OF PERRIS, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and ALBERT A. WEB ASSOCIATES, a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to individually as “Party” or collectively as “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. Pursuant to the Perris Municipal Code, City has the authority to enter into and execute this Agreement.

B. The Parties desire to formalize the selection of Consultant for performance of those services defined and described particularly in this Agreement and desire that the terms of that performance be as particularly defined and described herein.

OPERATIVE PROVISIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “Scope of Services” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services” or “work” hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants: a) all services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent and satisfactory manner; b) all materials used for services will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended; and, c) Consultant shall follow the highest professional standards and practices in performing the services required hereunder.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the scope of services or work included in Consultant’s proposal or bid, which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal or bid, and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. No other terms and conditions from Consultant’s proposal or bid, other than description of scope of services or work, shall apply to this Agreement, unless specifically agreed to by City in writing.

1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules and regulations of City and any federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time services are rendered. 643
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -2-
City, and its officers, employees and agents, shall not be liable at law or in equity for failure of Consultant to comply with this Section.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

1.5 Additional Services and Compensation. City shall have the right at any time during the performance of the services, without invalidating this Agreement, to order extra work beyond that specified in the Scope of Services or make changes to the work by altering, adding to or deducting from said work. No such extra work may be undertaken unless a written order, consistent with both Section 9.4 as well as the Perris Municipal Code (“PMC”), is first given by City to Consultant, incorporating therein any adjustment in the Contract Sum for the actual costs of the extra work and/or the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Consultant. Any increase in the Contract Sum of up to ten percent (10%) of the Contract Sum or $40,000, whichever is less, may be approved by the City Manager pursuant to Section 9.4. Any greater increases, taken either separately or cumulatively, must be approved by the City Council. It is expressly understood by Consultant that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. Consultant hereby acknowledges that it accepts the risk that the services to be provided pursuant to the Scope of Services may be more costly or time consuming than Consultant anticipates and that Consultant shall not be entitled to additional compensation therefor.

City may in its sole and absolute discretion have similar work done by other consultants.

1.6 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants Consultant: a) has thoroughly investigated and considered services to be performed, b) has carefully considered how services should be performed, and c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of services under this Agreement.

1.7 Software and Computer Services. If the Scope of Services includes the provision and/or installation of any software, computer system, or other computer technology, Consultant represents and warrants that it is familiar with and/or has inspected City’s current infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software and that the software, computer system, or other computer technology provided and/or installed by Consultant under this Agreement is compatible, and shall be fully functional, with such infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software of City. Consultant acknowledges that City is relying on this representation by Consultant as a material consideration in entering into this Agreement.

1.8 Prevailing Wages. If services include any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 16000 et seq., and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, 644
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -3-
Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws.

1.9 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the amounts specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. The total compensation, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed One Million Eight Hundred Twelve Thousand Two Hundred Twenty Four Dollars and Zero Cents ($1,812,224.00) (“Contract Sum”), unless additional compensation is approved pursuant to Section 1.5. Compensation may include reimbursement, for actual and necessary expenditures, if both specified in the Schedule of Compensation, as well as approved by City in advance. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Consultant at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City. Consultant agrees that if Consultant becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the work or services, Consultant shall promptly notify the Contract Officer of said fact, circumstance, technique or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto.

2.2 Invoices. Unless some other method of payment is specified in Exhibit C, Schedule of Compensation, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first business day of such month, Consultant shall submit to City, in a form approved by City’s Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. Except as provided in Sections 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement generally within thirty (30) days, and City will use its best efforts to make payment no later than forty-five (45) days, from the submission of an invoice in an approved form. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. Each invoice is to include (unless otherwise specified by City): 1) line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate; 2) line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services; 3) line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation; and 4) line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.2 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, 645
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -4-
this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of the services, which shall be no later than September 29, 2030 (“Term”).

3.3 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference. Such time period(s) may be increased by the Contract Officer, provided that such increases shall not serve to extend the Term.

3.4 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify City in writing of the causes of the delay. City shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of City such delay is justified. City’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representative of Consultant. The representative of Consultant is Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE, Senior Vice President, 951-248-4237, [email protected], who is authorized to act on Consultant’s behalf with respect to the work or services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the representative was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 Contract Officer for City. The Contract Officer for City is John Pourkazemi, PE (City Engineer, 951-956-2120, [email protected] (or such person as may be designated by the City Manager). The Contract Officer shall be the primary person on behalf of City responsible for the administration of the Agreement. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to 646
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -5-
assure that the Contract Officer is kept informed of both the progress of the performance of the services as well as any decisions which must be made by City.

4.3 Approvals from City. City approvals or actions, pursuant to the authority of this Agreement, are to be made (unless otherwise specified) either by the City Manager or by their delegate as provided for in writing.

4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City, nor any of its officers, employees or agents, shall have any control over the manner or means by which Consultant, or its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain under only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it, or any of its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are officers, employees or agents of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to City pursuant to this Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive control and direction.

No City employee benefits shall be available to Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, in connection with the performance of this Agreement. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. In the event that Consultant or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, to be classified as other than an independent contractor for City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor Consultant used to provide services under this Agreement, is/are employees of City.

4.5 Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, without express written approval of City, Consultant shall not contract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part services required hereunder without express written approval of City, and neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred or assigned. No approved transfer shall release Consultant, or any surety or insured of Consultant, of any liability hereunder without express written consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages. Prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, and without limiting Consultant’s indemnification obligation to City, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, for the duration of the Agreement, primary policies of insurance of the type and amounts below, issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an 647
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -6-
assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by City, which shall cover all elected and appointed officers, employees and agents of City. City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving Consultant ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change.

If such change results in substantial additional cost to Consultant, City and Consultant may renegotiate Consultant’s compensation.
(a) Commercial General Liability Insurance. A policy of commercial general liability insurance, with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) form CG 00 01, written on a per occurrence basis for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Defense costs must be paid in addition to limits. Coverage for an additional insured shall not be limited to its vicarious liability. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted. Limits shall be no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence for all covered losses and no less than $4,000,000 general aggregate.
(b) Worker’s Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker’s compensation insurance in such amount as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained by Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement.
(c) Automobile Liability. A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance, at least as broad as ISO form CA 00 01, written on a per occurrence basis covering bodily injury and property damage in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased, hired cars and any automobile.
(d) Professional Liability. Professional liability insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession. This coverage may be written on a “claims made” basis and must include coverage for contractual liability. Any policy inception date, continuity date, or retroactive date must be before the effective date of this Agreement. The professional liability insurance required by this Agreement must be endorsed to be applicable to claims based upon, arising out of, or related to services performed under this Agreement. The insurance must be maintained for at least five (5) consecutive years following the completion of Consultant’s services or the termination of this Agreement. During this additional 5-year period, Consultant shall annually and upon request of City submit written evidence of this continuous coverage. Limits shall be no less than $2,000,000 per claim and no less than $4,000,000 general aggregate. (e) Cyber Liability. Cyber liability insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession and the services hereunder, written on a per occurrence basis, with limits not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss, and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations undertaken by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving: infringement of intellectual property; copyright; trademark; invasion of privacy violations; data breach; electronic information theft, loss, damage, destruction, alteration or misuse; release of private information; extortion; and, 648
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -7-
network security. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties, and credit monitoring expenses, with limits sufficient to respond to these obligations.
(f) Excess Liability Insurance. Excess liability insurance may be used to satisfy the obligations herein. If excess liability insurance is used then the policy shall meet all the requirements herein and be at least as broad as the primary coverages set forth herein. Such policy shall: 1) include a drop down feature requiring the policy to respond if primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason; 2) be payable on behalf of wording as opposed to reimbursement; 3) have concurrency of effective dates with primary policies; 4) “follow form” to the underlying primary policies; and, 5) provide insureds, under primary policies required herein, shall be insureds under the excess liability policy. (g) Subcontractors. In the event Consultant subcontracts any portion of the work in compliance with Section 4.5 of this Agreement, Consultant shall either: 1) include each subcontractor as insureds under its policies of insurance required herein; or, 2) Consultant shall furnish to City all documentation, required in Article 5 for Consultant, for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall include all of the requirements stated herein.

5.2 General Insurance Requirements.
(a) Proof of Insurance, Enforcement and Notice. No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until both Consultant has provided City with insurance certificates, endorsement forms and appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance coverages, as well as said documentation is approved by City. City reserves the right to inspect complete, certified copies of, and endorsements to, all required insurance policies, at any time.

Any failure to comply with the reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches or warranties shall not affect coverage provided to City. In the event any insurance policy required under this Agreement is cancelled or amended (and the insurance policy is not replaced pursuant to subsection (b) below), or does not comply with Article 5, then: 1) City has the right but not the duty to obtain insurance required herein and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments; or, 2) City, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, may immediately terminate this Agreement. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Consultant’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required insurance policies. (b) Cancellation/Amendment. All of herein required policies of insurance shall provide the insurance may not be amended or cancelled by insurer or any Party hereto without providing thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice (with exception of ten (10) calendar days prior written notice for nonpayment) to City. In the event any of said policies of insurance are amended or cancelled, Consultant shall, five (5) business days prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Agreement to City. (c) Additional Insureds. The commercial general liability policy provided for in Section 5.1(a) and the automobile liability policy provided for in Section 5.1(c) both shall name City and its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents (“City Parties”) as additional insureds and such coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded 649
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -8-
to City and City Parties. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability, and policies of insurance shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions. (d) Primary, Subrogation, Contribution and Coverage. All of the above policies of insurance shall be primary insurance. The insurers for the above policies, Consultant and any subcontractors are all deemed hereof to waive all rights of subrogation and contribution they may have against City or City Parties, and their respective insurers, and all insurance policies required herein shall be endorsed to waive such rights. Any insurance maintained by City or City Parties will apply in excess of, and not contribute with, Consultant’s insurance. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum amounts provided herein, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City and City Parties. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with this Agreement if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained herein are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any Party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.
(e) Limitations, Self- Insured Retention and Deductibles. Consultant agrees that requirements of Article 5 shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Consultant may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or property resulting from Consultant’s activities or the activities of any person or persons for which Consultant is otherwise responsible nor shall it limit Consultant’s indemnification liabilities as provided in Section 5.3. All insurance policies must specify that where the primary insured does not satisfy any self-insured retention, any additional insured may satisfy the self-insured retention.

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. At City’s option, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City and City Parties, or Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, attorneys’ fees, defense expenses and claims.

5.3 Indemnification.
(a) General Obligations. Consultant agrees, to the full extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents (each an “Indemnitee” and collectively, “Indemnitees”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein “Claims or Liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (each an “Indemnitor” and collectively, “Indemnitors”), or arising 650
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -9-
from Indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: 1) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed or threatened in connection with any such Claims or Liabilities, or at option of Indemnitee(s) will reimburse and pay for all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by Indemnitee(s) in connection therewith; and, 2) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against Indemnitee(s) for any such Claims or Liabilities, and will save and hold Indemnitee(s) harmless therefrom.
(b) Further Provisions. The indemnity obligation herein shall be binding on successors, assigns and heirs of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement.

Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements as provided herein with its subcontractors, and if Consultant fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefor. Failure of City and/or City Parties (collectively “City” for solely this Section 5.3(b)) to monitor compliance with any of the indemnification provisions herein shall not be a waiver hereof. The indemnification provisions herein do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful misconduct, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnification provided herein includes Claims or Liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services hereunder. Payment of invoices by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of the indemnity obligation herein. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, Consultant will be obligated to pay for City’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City as solely negligent or responsible for willful misconduct.

Consultant will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorneys’ fees, expert fees and costs of litigation. (c) Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Indemnitees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all Claims and Liabilities, consistent with all obligations provided for in this Section 5.3, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (“books and records”) as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable City to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such books and records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, shall be complete and detailed, and shall be readily accessible. City shall have full and free access to such books and 651
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -10-
records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts. Such books and records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder. City shall have access to such books and records in the event any audit is required. Consultant shall fully cooperate with City in providing access to any and all Consultant records and documents if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (“documents and materials”) prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of City and/or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership, use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant may retain copies of such documents and materials for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents and materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, with respect to any Consultant documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for City.

6.3 Confidentiality and Release of Information. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant.

Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from City. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from City or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant immediately gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.

If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorneys’ fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. As concerning, regarding or related to, in any way, this Agreement and the work performed thereunder: a) Consultant shall immediately notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party; b) City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding; and, c) Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant, however, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 652
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -11-
ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S.

District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Riverside, State of California.

7.2 Suspension, or Termination, Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section 7.4 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate or suspend this Agreement, or any portion hereof, at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days’ notice to Consultant, except that where termination or suspension is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as determined by City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination or suspension, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder, unless the notice provides otherwise, or except such as specifically approved by City. Upon submittal of an invoice consistent with Section 2.2, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination or suspension and for any services authorized by City thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation, or such as may be approved by City, except as provided in Section 7.5. In event of termination, or suspension, without cause pursuant to this Section, there is no need to provide opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.3.

7.3 Default of Consultant and Opportunity to Cure. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively ten (10) days, but may be extended, or reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices, without liability for interest. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe, City may immediately both terminate this Agreement with notice to Consultant as well as pursue the remedy in Section 7.4, without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.4 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.3, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to 653
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -12-
Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed by City therefor.

7.5 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

7.6 Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement of this Agreement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

7.7 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.8 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees. If either Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys’ fees. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorneys’ fees on any appeal, and a Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, consultants’ fees, taking depositions and 654
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -13-
discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. Such fees and costs shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY, CONFLICTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of City. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. City, in its sole discretion, shall determine the existence of a conflict of interest and may terminate this Agreement in the event such a conflict of interest exists upon sending Consultant written notice describing the conflict.

No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects their financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices. Any notice or other communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person in regards to this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in the case of City addressed to the Contract Officer at City of Perris, 101 N. “D” Street, Perris, CA 92570, and in the case of Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the execution page of this Agreement. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally 655
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -14-
delivered or in seventy-two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement, headings used, or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument, whether the signatures are originals, electronic, or digital.

9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties as to the Agreement.

It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement, and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, concerning this Agreement, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City, provided that City’s approval thereof shall only be valid if made in a manner consistent with the PMC.

9.5 Severability. Should a portion of this Agreement be declared invalid or unenforceable by a judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 No Undue Influence. Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer or employee of City in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of City has or will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to remedies in Section 7.4 and any and all remedies at law or equity.

9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.
656
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -15-
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
657
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 -16-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF PERRIS, a California municipal
corporation
_____________________________________
Clara Miramontes
City Manager
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Nancy Salazar, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
_____________________________________
Sunny K. Soltani, City Attorney
[pks; rjl]
CONSULTANT:

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, a
California corporation
By: _________________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: ________________________
By: _________________________________
Name: ________________________
Title: ________________________
Address: 3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairperson of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.)

APPROPRIATE ATTESTATIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE BYLAWS,

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, OR OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONSULTANT’S BUSINESS ENTITY.
658
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 A-1

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform services described in Consultant’s Proposal and detailed below.

II. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by City, and must be revised by Consultant without additional charge to City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

III. Consultant will perform the following Services, and prepare and deliver the following tangible work products as described below to City:
*Additional details on Phase 1, Task 7.3 (Technical Studies) can be found on page A-9 659
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-2
660
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-3
661
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-4
662
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-5
663
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-6
664
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-7
665
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-8
666
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 A-9
*The below detailed tasks are a part of Phase 1, Task 7.3 (Technical Studies) 667
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-10
668
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-11
669
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-12
670
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026
A-13
671
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 A-14
VI. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services:

A. Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE, Vice President, City Liason
B. Nick Lowe, PE, TE, Deputy Director, Project Delivery and Coordination C. Stephanie Standerfer, Vice President, Environmental & Permitting Lead D. Joseph Caldwell, Practice Area Leader, Hydrology & Hydraulics Lead E. Myung Choo, PE, TE, Practice Area Leader, Traffic & Transportation Lead F. Deborah Saulina, Project Coordinator, Utility Coordination Lead G. Jason Ardery, Deputy Director, Survey/Row Lead
H. Scott Hildebrant, Chief Strategy Officer, Public Outreach I. Mark Thomas, Lynn Odgiiv, Structural Engineering, Subconsultant J. Earth Mechanics, Inc., Alahesh Thurairajah, Geotechnical Analysis, Subconsultant K. Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, Zawwar Saiyed, VMT Analysis, Subconsultant L. ECORP, Inc., Kevin Israel, Biological Studies, Subconsultant M. Applied Earthworks, Sarah Rieboldt, Cultural Studies, Subconsultant N. Visual Concepts Lighting, Kenny Perez, Lighting Design and Electrical Engineering, Subconsultant
O. T2 Utility Engineering, Arthur G. Robison, Subsurface Utility Engineering, Subconsultant
P. RGI Utility Consultants, Inc., Robert H. Gregory, Utility Source and Design, Subconsultant
672
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 B-1

EXHIBIT B

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Agreement Boilerplate)
[not applicable]
673
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 C-1

EXHIBIT C

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. Consultant will be compensated for Services provided under this Agreement in accordance with the schedule in Consultant’s Proposal and detailed below.

II. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice, as described in Section 2.2.

III. The total compensation for the Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum, as provided in Section 2.1 of this Agreement.

IV. Consultant shall perform the following tasks at the following rates as detailed in the Cost Proposal:

A. Phase 1 (Environmental and Permitting) - $989,474.00 B. Phase 2 (Design) - $822,750.00
674
01006.0006 2193176.1 9/10/2026 D-1

EXHIBIT D

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE
I. Consultant shall perform all services and deliver all work products timely in accordance with the schedule described in Consultant’s Proposal and detailed below. 675
ATTACHMENT 3

COST PROPOSAL
676
City of Perris | Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project over San Jacinto River (CIP S160) August 20, 2026
John Pourkazemi, PE
City Engineer
City of Perris
24 S. D Street, Suite 100
Perris, CA 92570
RE: City of Perris RFP for Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project over San Jacinto River (CIP S160)
Dear John:

Thank you for meeting with us yesterday to discuss the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project. We appreciated the candid discussion with you, Kamran Saber, Brad Brophy, and Grace Alvarez, and the opportunity to understand the City’s priorities and concerns better.

During the interview, WEBB presented approximately $160,000 in Phase 1 and Phase 2 budget reductions. Since then, we have further reduced the Phase 1 Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis budget by 20%, increasing the total savings to more than $170,000. We also revised the heading for Task 3 in Phase 2 to clarify that project management applies specifically to the PS&E Phase (Task 1).

The easterly alignment discussed during the interview offers an important advantage: it keeps the existing bridge open during construction while avoiding impacts to RCA-owned MSHCP conservation lands and easements. This gives the project a stronger starting position with RCA and the resource agencies.

Just as important is the project-specific experience Stephanie Standerfer and Joseph Caldwell bring: Stephanie knows the MSHCP process, RCA, the resource agencies, and the local players, while Joseph knows the San Jacinto River, its hydraulic model, Flood Control requirements, scour, and sediment transport.

The City should not have to wait while another team learns the river, MSHCP, RCA, and local agency requirements.

Stephanie and Joseph can address these issues immediately, helping City Staff identify concerns earlier and reduce the potential for redesign and delay.

We understand there is already significant interest in the project’s status, including from the City Council. Our goal is to begin quickly and deliver the project as soon as reasonably possible. Because our team already knows the river, the agencies, and the local issues, we can spend less time learning and more time advancing the project.

Our revised budget reduces costs without sacrificing the experience needed to protect the City, maintain momentum, and advance the project.

WEBB greatly values our long-standing relationship with the City of Perris. We appreciate your consideration and look forward to the opportunity to continue working together on this important project.

Sincerely,
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
Albert A. Webb Associates
Corporate Headquarters
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
T: 951.686.1070
F: 951.788.1256
W: webbassociates.com
E: [email protected]
677
Item Description Scott R. Hildebrandt,
Principal II
Dilesh R. Sheth,
Principal II
Nicholas R. Lowe,
Principal II
Jaimee Bourgeois,
Principal II
Myung G. Choo,
Principal II
Son H. Le, Senior I
Miguel Hurtado, Senior
I
Joy A. Schwiebert,
Associate I
Cole Benner, Assistant
V
Deborah A. Saulina,
Assistant V
Joseph C. Caldwell,
Principal II
Ash Ai, Associate III
Stephanie N.

Standerfer, Principal II
Eliza Laws, Principal I
Autumn DeWoody,
Senior I
Monica Tobias,
Associate III
Jacqueline N. Gamboa,
Assistant III
Julia Archibeque,
Assistant III
Cameron Blomquist,
Assistant II
Jason Ardery, Principal
II
Jon Ros, Senior II
Shane Bloomfield,
Principal II
Kase Gebbie,
Associate III
2-Man Survey Party
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Earth Mechanics,
Inc.

ECORP Consulting,
Inc.

Applied
Earthworks
Mark Thomas
LLG
T2 Utility
Engineering
Visual Concepts
Lighting
RGI Utility
Consultants
Expenses
Total/task
1 Billout Rate 312$ 312$ 312$ 312$ 312$ 258 $ 258$ 217$ 196$ 196$ 312$ 240$ 312$ 298$ 258$ 240$ 163$ 163$ 147$ 312$ 267$ 312$ 240$ 326$ PHASE I Task 1 - Project Management 56 102 126 6 42 42 2 12 388 116,184$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 116,184

1.1 Project Management 20 48 48 4 4 2 126 $ 39,312 $ 39,3121.2 Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 $ 3,512 $ 3,5121.3 Monthly PDT Meetings and Scheduling 16 28 28 16 28 116 $ 34,336 $ 34,3361.4 Coordination with Subconsultants and Agencies 20 24 48 2 24 8 8 134 $ 39,024 $ 39,024 Task 2 - Utility Research and Coordination 12 22 4 12 40 34 2 12 12 150 35,852$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 46,739$ $ - 54,956$ $ 75 $ 137,622

2.1 Data Compilation and Site Visit 4 4 4 4 8 16 40 $ 9,100 $ 75 $ 9,1752.2 Utility Conflict Mapping/Relocation Coordination 8 16 8 24 16 12 12 96 $ 23,688 $ 54,956 $ 78,6442.3 Utility Potholing 2 8 2 2 14 $ 3,064 $ 46,739 $ 49,803 Task 3 - Surveying and Base Map Preparation 2 2 8 1 20 3 9 36 40 121 33,929$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 170$ $ 34,099

3.1 Field Topographic Survey 4 1 20 2 4 12 32 75 $ 20,661 $ 136 $ 20,7973.2 Alignment / ROW Mapping 2 2 4 1 5 24 8 46 $ 13,268 $ 34 $ 13,302 Task 4 - Right of Way Analysis 4 2 4 2 16 8 36 $ 9,376 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 9,376

4.1 Right of Way Analysis 4 2 4 2 16 8 36 $ 9,376 $ 9,376 Task 5 - Geotechnical Analysis 2 4 2 1 9 $ 2,460 $ 10,912 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 13,372

5.1 Preliminary Foundation Report 2 4 2 1 9 $ 2,460 $ 10,912 $ 13,372 Task 6 - Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening 1 2 12 15 $ 4,032 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 4,032

6.1 VMT Screening Memo 1 2 12 15 $ 4,032 $ 4,032
Task 7 - Environmental Documentation 36 18 38 40 40 82 31 76 242 272 12 56 943 216,058$ $ - 139,150$ 22,781$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 377,989 ISMND

7.1 Environmental Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 $ 3,274 $ 3,2747.2 Project Description 2 2 4 16 2 2 12 12 52 $ 11,688 $ 11,6887.3 ISMND 2 Screenchecks + Noticing 4 6 4 80 200 294 $ 55,868 $ 55,8687.4 Final MND 2 12 40 50 104 $ 21,950 $ 21,9507.5 Environmental Meetings and Coordination 20 4 20 20 40 80 184 $ 49,328 $ 6,600 $ 55,928 Technical Studies

7.6 Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis/Energy 8 24 6 38 $ 9,122 $ 9,1227.7 MSHCP Consistency Analysis (ECORP) 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 28 $ 7,582 $ 18,150 $ 25,7327.8 Focused Plant Surveys(ECORP) 4 2 6 $ 1,326 $ 4,400 $ 5,7267.9 Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys (ECORP) 4 2 6 $ 1,326 $ 17,050 $ 18,376

7.10 Crotch's Bumble Bee Surveys (ECORP) 4 2 6 $ 1,326 $ 21,450 $ 22,7767.11 Jurisdictional Delineation (ECORP) 4 2 6 $ 1,326 $ 16,500 $ 17,8267.12 DBESP (ECORP) 4 2 6 $ 1,326 $ 14,300 $ 15,6267.13 JPR Process, ARL equivalency Analysis (ECORP) 4 4 4 8 8 4 32 $ 8,892 $ 40,700 $ 49,5927.14 Cultural and Paleo (Applied Earthworks) 1 2 2 5 $ 1,104 $ 22,781 $ 23,885 Regulatory Permitting

7.15 Regulatory Permitting (USACE, CDFW, RWQCB) 4 4 4 40 20 40 12 40 164 $ 40,620 $ 40,620 Task 8 - Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis 8 8 8 44 80 148 $ 40,416 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 40,416

8.1 Hydrology and Hyudraulic Analysis 6 6 6 20 48 86 $ 23,376 $ 23,3768.2 Bridge Hydrology and Hydraulic Report 2 2 2 24 32 62 $ 17,040 $ 17,040 Task 9 - Preliminary Engineering (30%) 16 28 28 6 48 20 40 80 216 4 16 32 64 598 145,608$ $ - $ - $ - 90,024$ $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 235,632

9.1 Structure Type Selection Report 8 8 8 16 2 8 50 $ 13,512 $ 90,024 $ 103,5369.2 Preliminary Street and Grading Design 4 16 16 40 40 80 200 2 398 $ 90,984 $ 90,9849.3 Preliminary Striping Design 4 20 24 $ 6,408 $ 6,4089.4 Preliminary EMWD Water and Sewer Design 24 64 88 $ 22,848 $ 22,8489.5 QA/QC 4 4 4 2 8 8 8 38 $ 11,856 $ 11,856 Task 10 - Community Outreach 8 8 $ 2,496 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 2,496

10.1 Community Outreach Coordination 8 8 $ 2,496 $ 2,496 Total 130 174 239 14 50 20 56 93 334 84 142 82 84 31 76 242 272 12 56 17 36 56 76 40 2416 606,411$ 10,912$ 139,150$ 22,781$ 90,024$ -$ 46,739$ -$ 54,956$ 245$ 971,218$ OPTIONAL TASK - VMT MODELING ANALYSIS 1 2 2 1 6 $ 1,756 $ - $ - $ - $ - 16,500$ $ - $ - $ - -$ $ 18,256

11.1 VMT Modeling and Report 1 2 2 1 6 $ 1,756 $ 16,500 $ - $ 18,256

1. Rounded to the nearest $1.

Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project Over San Jacinto River (CIP S160) - PHASE 1 - Revised 8/20/2026City of Perris G:\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Perris\20260253 Goetz Road Bridge\Proposal Data\26-0253_REV_Phase 1 Budget Estimate 8/20/20264:12 AM 678
Item Description
Scott R. Hildebrandt,
Principal II
Dilesh R. Sheth,
Principal II
Nicholas R. Lowe,
Principal II
Jaimee Bourgeois,
Principal II
Myung G. Choo,
Principal II
Son H. Le, Senior I
Miguel Hurtado, Senior
I
Joy A. Schwiebert,
Associate I
Cole Benner, Assistant
V
Deborah A. Saulina,
Assistant V
Joseph C. Caldwell,
Principal II
Joshua J. O'Rourke,
Associate II
Total Hours
Subtotal - Labor
Earth Mechanics,
Inc.

Mark Thomas
Visual Concepts
Lighting
Expenses
Total/task
1 Billout Rate 312$ 312$ 312$ 312$ 312$ 258 $ 258$ 217$ 196$ 196$ 312$ 229$ PHASE II Task 1 - Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) 12 26 73 6 82 42 92 120 310 22 52 136 973 $ 235,140 $ 136,355 $ 329,340 $ 13,200 $ - $ 714,035

1.1 Street, Grading, and Drainage Plans 8 16 40 40 60 80 280 4 40 120 688 $ 160,912 $ 160,9121.2 Structure Design Plans and Independent Check 4 4 8 16 32 $ 8,464 $ 283,844 $ 292,3081.3 Signing & Striping Plans 2 4 2 40 48 $ 12,816 $ 12,8161.4 Street Light Plans 1 2 6 1 10 $ 2,308 $ 13,200 $ 15,5081.5 QA/QC 8 24 24 8 64 $ 18,672 $ 18,6721.6 Technical Specifications 2 8 2 8 2 8 24 12 2 8 76 $ 18,332 $ 19,140 $ 37,4721.7 Construction Cost Estimates 2 4 8 24 4 2 8 52 $ 12,816 $ 26,356 $ 39,1721.8 Geo. Investigation, Testing, Analysis, Report 1 1 1 3 $ 820 $ 136,355 $ 137,175 Task 2 - Bid and Construction Support (T&M) 2 7 12 3 10 4 8 24 12 9 8 99 $ 25,072 $ - $ 24,651 $ - $ - $ 49,723

2.1 Pre-Bid Meeting 1 1 1 1 4 $ 1,248 $ 1,100 $ 2,3482.2 Response to Bidder Inquiries 2 1 2 4 2 1 12 $ 3,048 $ 2,750 $ 5,7982.3 Pre-Construction Meeting 1 1 1 1 4 $ 1,248 $ 1,320 $ 2,5682.4 Review Equipment and Materials Submittals 2 2 1 4 2 2 13 $ 3,306 $ 2,640 $ 5,9462.5 Response to RFIs and Change Orders 4 4 1 4 2 16 8 2 4 45 $ 10,816 $ 11,341 $ 22,1572.6 Final Record Drawings 1 2 1 2 1 8 2 4 21 $ 5,406 $ 5,500 $ 10,906 Task 3 - Project Management for PS&E Phase (Task 1 Above) 28 52 60 6 24 28 198 $ 58,992 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 58,992

3.1 Project Management 12 20 20 4 4 60 $ 18,720 $ 18,7203.2 Monthly PDT Meetings and Scheduling 8 16 16 8 16 64 $ 19,040 $ 19,0403.3 Coordination with Subconsultants and Agencies 8 16 24 2 16 8 74 $ 21,232 $ 21,232 Total 42 85 145 15 92 46 92 128 334 58 89 144 1270 $ 319,204 $ 136,355 $ 353,991 $ 13,200 $ - $ 822,750 Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project Over San Jacinto River (CIP S160) - PHASE 2 - Revised 8/20/2026City of Perris G:\Proposals\FORMAL PROPOSALS\City of Perris\20260253 Goetz Road Bridge\Proposal Data\26-0253_REV_Phase 2 Budget Estimate 8/20/20264:13 AM 679
ATTACHMENT 4

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
680
Mapes Rd
San Jacinto River
Yosemite Ave
Cabrillo Ct
Appalachian Dr
Watson Rd
San Jacinto River
Mapes Rd
Goetz Rd
Goetz Rd Goetz Rd
Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, WRCRCA, Vantor MSHCP Boundary
Parcel Information
Cities
Criteria Cells
MSHCP Covered Roads Right-of-Way

ARTERIAL
MAJOR

COLLECTOR
MSHCP Conserved Additional Reserve Lands
Additional Reserve Lands (ARL)
World Imagery
Low Resolution 15m Imagery
High Resolution 60cm Imagery
High Resolution 30cm Imagery
Citations

2.4m Resolution Metadata
5/6/2026, 11:18:10 AM
0 300 600 1,200 ft
0 90 180 360 m
1:7,820
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2025
webbassociates.com
Proposal to Provide Environmental Clearance, Permitting, Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E), and Bidding/Construction Support Services for

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT

PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER
(CIP S160)
June 10, 2026
951.686.1070 3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
Prepared for:

City of Perris
681

2. Letter of Transmittal .............................................................1

3. Technical Proposal ...............................................................4 Project Understanding .................................................................................. 5 Project Approach.......................................................................................... 5 Scope of Work ........................................................................................... 12 Proposed Staffing Plan, Qualifications, and Organization ............................ 20 Key Personnel Assignments and Availability................................................ 21 WEBB Resumes......................................................................................... 22 Subconsultant Qualification Summary Table................................................ 31 Corporate Qualifications of the Firm and the Team...................................... 32 WEBB’s Financial Condition........................................................................ 32 Conflict of Interest Statement...................................................................... 32 Firm Experience and Public Agency Qualifications ...................................... 33 Subconsultants........................................................................................... 34 Project Experience...................................................................................... 36 Mark Thomas Bridge Project Experience .................................................... 39 Evidence of Insurance ................................................................................ 40 Appendix A: Environmental Scope of Work..........................41 Appendix B: Exhibits..............................................................47 Appendix C: Project Schedule...............................................50 Appendix D: Subconsultant Commitment Letters................52 Table of
Contents Mapes Rd
an Jacinto River
semite Ave
Cabrillo Ct
Appalachia
n
Dr
Watson Rd
San Jacinto
Mapes Rd
G
o
etz
R
d
G
o
etz
R
d
o
etz
R
d
MSHCP Map APN
682

2. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
1 Cabri
Appalachi
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
G
o
e
t
z
R
d

2. LETTER OF

TRANSMITTAL
683

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
2 June 10, 2026
John Pourkazemi, PE, City Engineer
City of Perris
24 S. D Street, Suite 100
Perris, CA 92570
RE: PROPOSAL FOR GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160) Dear Mr. Pourkazemi,
The Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project represents one of the most important transportation investments currently facing the City of Perris. More than simply replacing an aging structure, this project will create a critical transportation link supporting future growth within the Green Valley Specific Plan area, improve regional mobility and multimodal connectivity, and provide a resilient crossing of the San Jacinto River for generations to come.

WEBB is uniquely qualified to deliver this project because we have already addressed many of the challenges the City will face. Our team recently led the Case Road Bridge Project over the San Jacinto River and has extensive experience throughout this corridor involving bridge, roadway, flood control, and utility infrastructure projects. Most importantly, WEBB has direct experience working within the San Jacinto River hydraulic model, coordinating with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and navigating the environmental requirements associated with projects located within the river corridor.

Our team has developed a strong understanding of the environmental sensitivities of the San Jacinto River, the requirements of the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Riverside County Flood Control, and resource agency permitting processes, as well as utility provider coordination needs. Through our work on projects throughout the river corridor, we have established productive working relationships with these agencies and understand how to efficiently address permitting, mitigation, and compliance requirements. This experience enables us to identify risks early, streamline agency coordination, and develop practical solutions that keep projects on schedule.

The proposed bridge replacement presents several critical challenges that will ultimately drive project success, including environmental permitting and MSHCP compliance, hydraulic performance and scour protection, bridge type selection and constructability, and utility coordination. These challenges are interconnected. Decisions regarding bridge length, profile, foundations, utility accommodations, and construction staging will influence environmental impacts, permitting requirements, project costs, construction feasibility, and long-term maintenance obligations. WEBB’s multidisciplinary team evaluates these factors holistically rather than as independent design elements, resulting in more efficient, cost-effective project solutions. WEBB’s approach is built around four strengths that directly support the City’s goals for this project:

1. Extensive RCA and MSHCP Compliance Experience: A key advantage WEBB brings to this project is our extensive experience with RCA and MSHCP compliance. Projects within the San Jacinto River corridor often require careful coordination to address sensitive habitats, species considerations, and consistency with regional conservation objectives. Our team understands the documentation, technical studies, avoidance measures, and mitigation strategies necessary to support successful project approvals. By integrating environmental planning with engineering design from the outset, we help agencies and project sponsors avoid costly redesigns and permitting delays later in the process.

2. Direct Experience with the San Jacinto River Hydraulic Model and Flood Control Requirements: Equally important is WEBB’s experience with the San Jacinto River hydraulic model and flood control requirements. Our familiarity with the river’s hydraulic characteristics, floodplain constraints, and County review expectations enables us to efficiently evaluate bridge alternatives, assess hydraulic impacts, and develop solutions that satisfy both transportation and flood-control objectives. This experience reduces uncertainty during design and supports a smoother review process with Riverside County Flood Control.

3. Extensive EMWD Utility Coordination Experience: One of the most significant advantages WEBB brings to this project is our extensive experience coordinating with the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). We have successfully delivered numerous projects requiring close coordination with EMWD and understand their design standards, utility accommodation requirements, operational needs, and review processes. This experience will be especially valuable as the City evaluates how to accommodate existing and planned sewer, recycled water, and water facilities within the replacement bridge structure. Our team recognizes that utility requirements will play a critical role in bridge type selection, foundation design, construction sequencing, and long-term maintenance considerations. We will work closely with EMWD from project inception to develop cost-effective, maintainable, and agency-supported solutions.

4. Local Corridor Expertise Combined with Premier Bridge Engineering: To complement WEBB’s local expertise, we have assembled an exceptional team of specialists led by Mark Thomas, one of California’s premier bridge engineering firms. Mark Thomas brings extensive bridge-replacement experience throughout California, including projects with complex environmental constraints, hydraulic and scour challenges, utility accommodations, and staged construction. Together, WEBB and Mark 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506 | P: 951.686.1070 | F: 951.788.1256 | www.webbassociates.com684

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
3 Thomas provide the City with nationally recognized bridge engineering expertise combined with direct San Jacinto River corridor experience, deep knowledge of RCA and MSHCP requirements, familiarity with the San Jacinto River hydraulic model, and proven success delivering complex bridge projects.

Our approach is straightforward: identify risks early, engage agencies proactively, integrate environmental and engineering decisions, and develop practical, buildable, and resilient solutions. By leveraging our experience on the Case Road Bridge Project, our understanding of the San Jacinto River hydraulic model, our long-standing relationships with the RCA, MSHCP stakeholders, Riverside County Flood Control, and utility providers, and our proven project delivery process, WEBB will help the City streamline approvals, minimize project risks, control costs, and advance the project efficiently from environmental clearance through final design and construction.

WEBB’s legal company name is Albert A. Webb Associates. WEBB’s corporate address is 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506; telephone: 951.686.1070; fax: 951.788.1256; website: www.webbassociates.com; email: [email protected].

The office assigned to this project is 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506. The person authorized to commit WEBB to the contractual terms and conditions of this RFP is Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE, Senior Vice President, 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506, who can be reached at 951.248.4237 or [email protected]. The contact person during the proposal evaluation phase is Nick Lowe, PE, TE, Deputy Director, 3788 McCray Street, Riverside, CA 92506, who can be reached at 951.248.4289 or [email protected].

The proposed subconsultants for this project are listed below, along with their respective roles:
• Mark Thomas, Lynn Odgiiv, 5000 East Spring Street, Suite 400, Long Beach, CA 90815, 562.213.0865 — Structural Engineering
• Earth Mechanics, Inc., Alahesh Thurairajah, 765 North Main Street, Suite 136, Corona, CA 92878, 714.751.3826 — Geotechnical Analysis
• Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers, Zawwar Saiyed, 2 Executive Circle, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92614, 949.825.6175 — VMT Analysis
• ECORP, Inc., Kevin Israel, 215 North 5th Street, Redlands, CA 92374, 909.307.0046 — Biological Studies • Applied Earthworks, Sarah Rieboldt, 133 N San Gabriel Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91107, 626.578.0119 — Cultural Studies • Visual Concepts Lighting., Kenny Perez, 4858 Mercury St 210, San Diego, CA 92111, 858.278.4503 Ext. 11 — Lighting Design and Electrical Engineering
• T2 Utility Engineering, Arthur G. Robison, 5622 Research Dr, Huntington Beach, CA 92649, 714.487.5783 — Subsurface Utility Engineering
• RGI Utility Consultants, Inc., Robert H. Gregory, 200 S Main St 316, Corona, CA 92882, 714.487.5783 — Utility Source and Design
WEBB will serve as the prime consultant and single point of responsibility for the City. Each subconsultant will be integrated into the project work plan under WEBB’s direct management for their respective technical scope.

WEBB acknowledges receipt of Addendum No. 1, received on May 11, 2026 and Addendum No. 2, received on May 26, 2026. This proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than 180 days from the date of submittal. By signing this letter of transmittal, WEBB attests that all information submitted with this proposal is true and correct.

The City of Perris can expect a responsive, technically rigorous team focused on clear communication, early issue resolution, regulatory coordination, and a buildable design that supports long-term mobility, safety, and resilience for the Goetz Road corridor.

Sincerely,
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
[email protected]
951.248.4237
685

3. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
4 Cabri
Appalachi
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
G
o
e
t
z
R
d

3. TECHNICAL

PROPOSAL
686

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
5 Project Understanding
The Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project represents a
critical transportation investment for the City of Perris and the Green Valley Specific Plan area. Goetz Road serves as a major north-south arterial corridor, providing connectivity between Ethanac Road, Case Road, and future planned development areas. The existing Bridge No. 56C-0172, constructed in 1970, is a six-span cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab bridge that no longer meets the City’s ultimate transportation vision, operational needs, or multimodal objectives.

Existing Goetz Road Bridge
The proposed project will replace the existing structure with a new four-lane bridge approximately 80 feet in width, providing increased vehicular capacity while enhancing
multimodal mobility through the inclusion of separated multiuse paths on both sides of the structure. The bridge must safely accommodate future traffic demands while providing a resilient crossing of the San Jacinto River and maintaining compatibility with surrounding environmental, hydraulic, and utility constraints.

Our team has extensive experience delivering bridge
replacement projects over major river crossings throughout California, including the Case Road Bridge Replacement
Project over San Jacinto River, the Nuevo Road Bridge
Replacement over the San Jacinto River, La Novia Avenue Bridge Replacement over San Juan Creek, and numerous
bridge rehabilitation and replacement projects for local agencies. Through these projects, the team has successfully navigated complex environmental permitting, hydraulic
modeling, utility coordination, geotechnical challenges, and phased construction while maintaining critical transportation connectivity. This experience provides our team with a thorough understanding of the technical, regulatory, and stakeholder coordination challenges associated with replacing bridges in environmentally sensitive river corridors.

One of the most significant project challenges is balancing transportation improvements with the environmentally sensitive setting surrounding the bridge crossing. The project is located adjacent to multiple Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Criteria Cells and
jurisdictional waters associated with the San Jacinto River and Green Valley Bypass Channel. Preliminary evaluations indicate that shifting the bridge alignment approximately 25 feet to the west may reduce impacts to sensitive habitat areas, avoid channel confluence conflicts, and improve long-term project feasibility. This potential shift introduces geometric design challenges that will require careful horizontal and vertical alignment development, including transition curves and roadway tie-ins north and south of the bridge.

Our environmental and water resources specialists have
successfully guided numerous infrastructure projects through MSHCP compliance, CEQA clearance, USACE permitting,
CDFW coordination, and Regional Water Quality Control
Board approvals. Having worked extensively within Riverside County, our team understands the regulatory expectations and coordination requirements necessary to efficiently advance projects through environmental review while minimizing impacts to sensitive resources.

Hydraulic performance and flood conveyance are equally
critical considerations. The bridge crossing must accommodate future design flood events while maintaining river hydraulics, minimizing scour potential, and satisfying Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District requirements.

The resulting hydraulic analyses will directly influence bridge span arrangement, profile elevations, foundation selection, and approach roadway design.

Our water resources and structures teams have extensive experience evaluating bridge hydraulics, scour conditions, and floodplain impacts throughout Riverside County. On projects such as the Case Road Bridge Replacement over the San
Jacinto River, our team performed detailed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses to establish bridge profiles, evaluate scour potential, and coordinate closely with flood control agencies.

This experience will allow us to efficiently evaluate bridge alternatives and develop a resilient design that balances hydraulic performance, constructability, and cost.

The project also requires comprehensive utility coordination.

Existing EMWD water, sewer, and recycled water facilities, as well as Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, and telecommunications infrastructure, traverse the project corridor and will require detailed investigation, conflict analysis, and relocation coordination. Successful delivery will depend upon early engagement with utility owners and proactive integration of utility requirements into the bridge and roadway design process.

WEBB has successfully coordinated utility relocations and utility agreements on numerous transportation projects throughout Riverside County, including projects involving EMWD, SCE, SoCalGas, Verizon, and telecommunications providers. Our utility coordination specialists understand the importance of identifying conflicts early, establishing realistic relocation schedules, and integrating utility requirements into the overall project delivery strategy.

The City is seeking a multidisciplinary team capable of advancing environmental documentation, preliminary
engineering, utility coordination, bridge design, roadway improvements, and final PS&E development in a seamless
and efficient manner. By combining Mark Thomas’ regionally recognized bridge expertise with WEBB’s local agency
relationships, environmental permitting experience, utility coordination capabilities, roadway design expertise, and extensive knowledge of Riverside County requirements,
our team is uniquely positioned to successfully deliver this important bridge replacement project.

Project Approach
Our approach to the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project is centered on early risk identification, collaborative decisionmaking, and the integration of environmental, hydraulic, geotechnical, utility, and structural design considerations from project inception through final delivery. Drawing upon lessons learned from the Case Road Bridge Replacement, La Novia Avenue Bridge Replacement, Nuevo Road Bridge Replacement, and other river crossing projects, we understand that early coordination between environmental, hydraulic, geotechnical, and structural disciplines is essential to controlling project risks and maintaining the schedule.
687

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
6 During Phase 1, our team will focus on developing a
technically sound and environmentally responsible preferred alternative through comprehensive preliminary engineering and environmental analysis. Early efforts will include evaluating bridge replacement alternatives, refining horizontal and vertical alignments, assessing the proposed westerly bridge shift, and identifying opportunities to minimize impacts to sensitive habitat areas, jurisdictional waters, and flood control facilities.

Mark Thomas’ bridge specialists will lead the bridge type selection and preliminary engineering effort, leveraging their extensive experience on bridge replacement projects throughout California. Concurrently, WEBB’s roadway, drainage, environmental, and utility coordination teams will evaluate corridor constraints and develop practical solutions that support both the bridge design and overall project objectives.

Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses will be initiated early to establish design flood criteria, evaluate water surface elevations, assess bridge scour potential, and determine the most appropriate bridge profile and span configuration. These findings will be integrated with geotechnical investigations to support foundation recommendations and bridge type
evaluations. Our structural team will work closely with hydraulic and geotechnical specialists to develop bridge concepts that balance constructability, long-term performance, maintenance considerations, and project cost.

Environmental compliance activities will proceed concurrently with engineering development. Our environmental specialists will perform the studies necessary to support CEQA
clearance and permit acquisition while coordinating closely with the Regional Conservation Authority, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and other resource agencies. Early agency engagement will help identify permitting requirements, reduce project risks, and support the City’s schedule objectives.

Utility coordination will begin during preliminary design to identify conflicts, establish relocation requirements, and incorporate utility solutions into the project design. Through proactive coordination with EMWD, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas Company, and telecommunications providers, we will minimize design changes during later project phases and reduce the potential for construction delays.

Upon completion of environmental clearance and preliminary engineering, our team will advance the preferred alternative into final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E). Roadway, bridge, drainage, utility, traffic control, signing, striping, and electrical improvements will be developed concurrently
to ensure a coordinated design. Throughout final design, we will maintain a strong focus on quality management,
constructability, agency coordination, and cost control to deliver a complete and biddable package that supports
successful construction implementation.

Critical Issue #1: Environmental Stewardship,
MSHCP Compliance, and Regulatory Permitting
The Challenge: The Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project is located within the environmentally sensitive San Jacinto River corridor, adjacent to MSHCP Criteria Cells and one of western Riverside County’s most important wildlife movement corridors.

The project must balance transportation improvements with protection of biological resources, jurisdictional waters, wildlife movement functions, cultural resources, floodplain features, and MSHCP conservation objectives. Environmental clearance will require coordination with multiple agencies and may involve CEQA compliance, Joint Project Review (JPR), MSHCP Consistency Analysis, DBESP documentation, biological
and cultural resource studies, jurisdictional delineations, and permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and the Regional Conservation Authority. The challenge is not simply obtaining permits but identifying and addressing environmental constraints early enough to avoid schedule delays, redesign, and increased mitigation costs.

Case Road Bridge MHSCP Riparian/Riverine
WEBB’s Advantage: WEBB brings extensive experience
navigating environmental permitting and MSHCP compliance within the San Jacinto River corridor through projects such as the Case Road Bridge Project and numerous transportation, drainage, and flood control projects throughout western Riverside County. Our team understands the regulatory
framework, environmental sensitivities, and agency
expectations that influence project approvals in this region.

More importantly, WEBB recognizes that environmental
success is often driven by engineering decisions. Bridge alignment, bridge length, roadway profile, construction access, utility relocations, drainage improvements, lighting, stormwater treatment, and hydraulic design all influence biological impacts, permitting requirements, mitigation obligations, and agency review timelines. Because our environmental, bridge, roadway, and water resources professionals work as an integrated team, environmental compliance is incorporated directly into project development rather than treated as a separate permitting effort.

Lessons Learned and Potential Solutions: One of the most important lessons learned from the Case Road Bridge Project is that environmental permitting risks are best managed when identified early and addressed through engineering solutions.

At Case Road, resource agencies requested modifications to the bridge design to better accommodate wildlife movement and habitat connectivity within the San Jacinto River corridor.

By understanding agency expectations early and evaluating alternatives during project development, the team was able to avoid significant redesign efforts later in the process. WEBB anticipates similar concerns may arise on the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project regarding wildlife movement, conservation area protection, lighting impacts, riparian resources, and floodplain functions.

Our solution to this critical issue is to define the pressure points at the start of the process. While we cannot change the regulatory process, we can mitigate the pitfalls we have encountered on similar projects. Experience has shown that the earlier significant hurdles are identified, the greater the opportunity to either modify the design or perform the technical analyses necessary to demonstrate that a challenge can be successfully overcome. To be successful with Critical Issue No. 1, WEBB will convene our environmental specialists, bridge 688

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
7 engineers, roadway designers, water resources engineers, permitting experts, and City staff at project initiation to collaboratively identify environmental constraints, evaluate alternatives, and develop solutions that avoid or minimize impacts before they become permitting challenges.

Potential solutions may include refining bridge alignment and length, minimizing the construction footprint, reducing impacts to sensitive habitat areas, maintaining wildlife movement opportunities, incorporating context-sensitive lighting, optimizing stormwater treatment BMPs, and developing
construction approaches that minimize impacts to riverine and riparian resources. By identifying permitting risks early and integrating environmental stewardship into engineering decision-making, WEBB will help the City streamline approvals, reduce project risk, minimize mitigation costs, and successfully advance the project through environmental clearance and permitting.

Critical Issue #2: Hydrology, Hydraulics, Drainage,
and Scour
The Challenge: The Goetz Road Bridge Replacement
crosses the San Jacinto River, one of Riverside County’s most significant flood control and environmental corridors. The replacement bridge must safely convey major flood events while maintaining floodplain functions, accommodating
existing drainage infrastructure, supporting environmental permitting requirements, and preserving wildlife movement. As a result, hydrology, hydraulics, drainage, scour, and floodplain considerations will influence bridge geometry, roadway profile, environmental clearance, utility coordination, permitting, and ultimately project cost and schedule.

A key early project decision will be establishing the ultimate design flood criteria and corresponding hydraulic design parameters. As identified in the City’s RFP, the bridge profile may need to be raised to accommodate the ultimate design flood event. These criteria will directly affect bridge opening requirements, roadway elevations, utility conflicts, environmental impacts, right-of-way needs, and construction costs. Establishing these parameters early will be critical to developing a practical, resilient, and cost-effective bridge replacement solution.

Bridge scour analysis will be conducted to ensure
structural integrity of proposed bridge piers.

WEBB’s Advantage: WEBB brings unmatched familiarity
with the San Jacinto River corridor through decades
of transportation, bridge, drainage, flood control, and environmental projects throughout the watershed. Our team has worked extensively on both the Case Road Bridge Project and Riverside County Flood Control’s San Jacinto River SJ-3 Project, giving us a comprehensive understanding of the river’s hydraulic behavior, floodplain functions, sediment transport processes, drainage infrastructure, environmental sensitivities, and regulatory requirements. Simply put, there is no learning curve. WEBB already understands the San Jacinto River,
its challenges, and the agencies responsible for reviewing improvements within the corridor.

Lessons Learned and Potential Solutions: During the
Case Road environmental and hydraulic evaluations, WEBB determined that the existing bridge length was hydraulically adequate to convey the required design flood event. However, resource agencies requested a significantly longer bridge span to maintain wildlife movement and habitat connectivity within the San Jacinto River corridor. Ultimately, the replacement bridge was extended to more closely match the adjacent
railroad bridge crossing, creating a wider and more functional wildlife corridor beneath the structure.

Case Road Bridge HEC-RAS Model
Based on this experience, WEBB anticipates that similar wildlife movement and habitat connectivity considerations may influence the ultimate bridge length for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement. While hydraulic analyses will establish the minimum bridge opening needed to convey the design
flood event, resource agencies may advocate for a longer structure to improve wildlife passage, reduce floodplain encroachment, and minimize impacts to sensitive resources.

To address this potential challenge, WEBB will evaluate bridge opening and bridge length alternatives early in the planning and environmental process, allowing hydraulic, environmental, and permitting considerations to be addressed concurrently rather than sequentially.

Our Approach: WEBB will develop detailed hydrologic,
hydraulic, drainage, and scour analyses to establish design criteria, evaluate bridge opening requirements, assess
floodplain impacts, confirm compatibility with existing drainage infrastructure, and support environmental permitting. By integrating bridge engineering, water resources, environmental compliance, and agency coordination from the outset, WEBB will help the City identify potential issues early, reduce project risk, minimize redesign, streamline regulatory approvals, and develop a bridge solution that satisfies both flood control and environmental objectives.

Our direct experience on the Case Road Bridge Project and the San Jacinto River SJ-3 Project provides the City with confidence that WEBB understands not only the bridge
crossing itself, but also the broader river system, flood control infrastructure, wildlife corridor requirements, and regulatory expectations that will ultimately influence project success.

Critical Issue #3: Bridge Type Selection, Utility
Accomodation, Constructability, and Traffic
Maintenance
The Challenge: The Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project presents a unique combination of structural, utility, hydraulic, environmental, and traffic maintenance challenges. The existing bridge, constructed in 1970, is a six-span cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab bridge supported on multi-column piers and seat-type abutments. While the structure has served the community well for more than five decades, it is no longer adequate to support the ultimate roadway improvements
689

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
8 envisioned for the corridor and must be replaced with a wider, more resilient facility that accommodates future transportation and utility needs.

The proposed replacement bridge will be approximately 200 feet long, 80 feet wide, and include four travel lanes, protected multi-purpose trails, and accommodations for critical utility infrastructure. One of the most significant project constraints is the presence of a proposed 12-inch recycled waterline, 10-inch sewer force main, and 6-inch sewer force main located beneath the existing bridge. These facilities must remain operational during construction and be incorporated into the ultimate bridge configuration while minimizing impacts to utility service and construction operations.

The project also requires maintaining traffic throughout construction, minimizing impacts to the San Jacinto River corridor, and developing a bridge solution that balances constructability, cost, long-term maintenance, and
environmental stewardship.

WEBB’s Advantage: WEBB has teamed with Mark Thomas,
one of California’s leading bridge engineering firms, to provide specialized structural engineering expertise for this project.

Together, our team brings extensive experience delivering bridge replacement projects throughout California, including river crossings with hydraulic constraints, environmental permitting requirements, utility conflicts, and complex construction staging.

Our team has already reviewed the existing bridge as-built plans and the latest Bridge Inspection Reports to gain
an understanding of the bridge’s structural configuration, condition, and replacement needs. This early effort allows us to immediately focus on evaluating bridge alternatives, utility accommodation strategies, hydraulic requirements, and construction sequencing rather than spending valuable project time becoming familiar with the existing structure.

In addition, our team’s recent experience on the nearby Case Road Bridge project and other San Jacinto River corridor improvements provides valuable local knowledge regarding hydraulic conditions, environmental permitting, utility coordination, and constructability considerations that will directly benefit the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project.

Lessons Learned and Potential Solutions: Through our
experience delivering bridge replacement projects throughout California, we have learned that successful projects are driven by early decisions regarding bridge type selection, utility accommodation, and construction staging.

One key lesson learned is that utility coordination must begin during preliminary engineering rather than later in the design process. At Goetz Road, the proposed 12-inch recycled
waterline, 10-inch sewer force main, and 6-inch sewer force main are critical facilities that influence bridge geometry, pier placement, and foundation design. Based on our preliminary evaluation, these utilities appear to be sufficiently deep to allow the bridge to be designed around them while maintaining service during Stage 1 construction. This creates an
opportunity to minimize utility relocations, reduce construction risk, and maintain service continuity throughout much of the project.

Another important lesson learned is that bridge constructability often drives project success. Precast bridge systems reduce construction duration, minimize environmental impacts,
improve worker safety, and allow traffic to be maintained more effectively than traditional cast-in-place construction methods.

For these reasons, our team recommends evaluating precast bridge alternatives as the preferred structural solution for the replacement bridge.

Utility Accommodation and Staged Construction Concept
Multiple structure types are feasible for the proposed bridge.

Preliminary evaluations indicate that a precast prestressed concrete (PC/PS) Voided Slab Girder structure may provide an ideal solution because its shallow depth minimizes roadway profile adjustments and reduces approach reconstruction requirements.

Bridge Type Selection
Based on our preliminary evaluation, the existing six-span bridge can be efficiently replaced with an approximately 200-foot-long, three-span bridge that improves hydraulic performance, reduces long-term maintenance requirements, and simplifies construction.

Multiple bridge types are feasible for the proposed crossing.

However, a Precast Prestressed Concrete California WideFlange (Ca-WF) Girder structure appears to be particularly well suited for the project. Ca-WF girders are among the most efficient and economical precast girder systems used throughout California and provide excellent span capabilities while minimizing field construction activities. Because the girders are fabricated off-site and erected rapidly in the field, construction duration can be reduced while minimizing impacts to traffic and the river corridor.

An additional advantage of the Ca-WF girder alternative is its ability to accommodate utility infrastructure within the bridge section while providing flexibility for staged construction. This makes the system particularly attractive for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project.

PC/PS California Wide-Flange (Ca-WF) Girder Typical
Section
A Precast Prestressed Concrete Voided Slab Girder alternative will also be evaluated during the Bridge Type Selection phase.

Voided slab systems offer a shallower structural depth, which 690

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
9 may reduce roadway profile adjustments and approach
reconstruction while maintaining required hydraulic freeboard above the design flood elevation. This alternative may provide advantages if minimizing profile changes becomes a significant project objective.

PC/PS Concrete Voided Slab Girder Typical Section
During preliminary engineering, WEBB and Mark Thomas will evaluate all feasible bridge alternatives based on structural efficiency, hydraulic performance, utility accommodation, environmental impacts, constructability, aesthetics,
maintenance requirements, life-cycle costs, and overall project economics. The preferred bridge type will be selected through a comprehensive Bridge Type Selection Study that identifies the most practical and cost-effective solution for the City.

The proposed bridge is anticipated to utilize circular multicolumn piers similar to the existing bridge and the recently constructed Case Road Bridge, providing visual continuity while reducing maintenance requirements. Open-end seat-type abutments are anticipated to provide a durable and economical abutment solution.

Constructability and Traffic Maintenance
Maintaining traffic throughout construction will be a critical project objective. Based on our experience with bridge
replacement projects throughout California, a staged
construction approach provides the most effective means of minimizing impacts to the traveling public while maintaining access through the corridor.

Under the proposed two-stage construction strategy,
approximately one-half of the new bridge will be constructed during Stage 1 while traffic continues to operate on the existing bridge. Existing utility facilities, including the recycled waterline and sewer force mains, can remain operational during this phase.

Once Stage 1 construction is complete, traffic will be shifted onto the newly constructed portion of the bridge. The existing bridge can then be demolished and removed while the
remaining bridge width is constructed during Stage 2. Utility facilities can be relocated into their ultimate configuration as necessary during this phase without significant disruption to service.

Proposed Two-Stage Construction Sequence
This approach minimizes traffic disruptions, maintains
emergency access, reduces detour requirements, and allows utility services to remain operational throughout much of the construction process. Similar staging techniques have been successfully implemented on numerous bridge replacement projects and will be refined during preliminary engineering and bridge type selection.

By combining WEBB’s expertise in roadway design, utility coordination, environmental permitting, and San Jacinto River corridor projects with Mark Thomas’ specialized bridge engineering capabilities, the project team will deliver a resilient, cost-effective, and highly constructible bridge replacement solution that accommodates critical utility infrastructure, minimizes impacts to the traveling public, and supports the City’s long-term transportation goals.

Critical Issue #4: Utility Coordination and Utility
Accomodation
The Challenge: Utility coordination will be a critical component of the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project, with EMWD facilities representing the most significant utility consideration affecting bridge design, construction sequencing, and longterm operations. Existing facilities include an EMWD 12-inch waterline adjacent to the bridge crossing, along with other utility infrastructure within the corridor.

Additional complexity is created by the City of Perris Regional Sewer Improvement Project and Perris Logistics Center South development, which are currently constructing a 12-inch recycled waterline, a 10-inch sewer force main, and a 6-inch sewer force main beneath the existing Goetz Road Bridge crossing. EMWD has determined that these facilities will ultimately be accommodated within the replacement bridge structure. The developer is funding the future utility relocation, while the City and/or EMWD will collect the funds and complete the utility installation as part of the bridge replacement project.

The Developer to Install Recycle Water and Sewer Force
Mains Under the River
Based on our review of the available utility information, the proposed recycled waterline and sewer force mains appear to be installed at sufficient depth beneath the existing bridge crossing to avoid direct conflicts with the proposed bridge foundations. This presents an opportunity to design the replacement bridge around the existing utility alignments while maintaining uninterrupted utility service during construction.

Current EMWD requirements indicate that the replacement bridge will ultimately accommodate a 24-inch casing for the recycled waterline, an 18-inch casing for the 10-inch sewer force main, and a 12-inch casing for the 6-inch sewer force main.

A key objective during preliminary engineering will be
confirming utility clearances and developing a bridge
configuration that allows these facilities to remain operational during construction before being relocated into their permanent bridge utility casings during Stage 2 construction. If feasible, 691

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
10 this approach could significantly reduce relocation costs, avoid reconstruction of recently installed infrastructure, minimize service disruptions, and simplify construction phasing.

Existing overhead utilities to be relocated within the
proposed bridge structure and undergrounded.

WEBB’s Advantage: WEBB has extensive experience
coordinating complex water, sewer, and recycled water
facilities with bridge and roadway projects throughout Riverside County. Our team has successfully delivered numerous
infrastructure projects requiring close coordination with EMWD and understands their design standards, review processes, utility accommodation criteria, operational requirements, and maintenance considerations.

One of WEBB’s greatest strengths is our long-standing working relationship with EMWD. We understand that successful
utility accommodation requires early planning and continuous coordination throughout project development. This familiarity allows our team to proactively identify issues, streamline agency coordination, and develop practical solutions that satisfy both bridge design and utility owner requirements.

WEBB recently designed the Case Road Bridge project in
the City of Perris, which required accommodation of utility facilities within the bridge structure and extensive coordination with utility owners. Through early planning and collaboration, WEBB developed utility crossing solutions that minimized conflicts, reduced future maintenance concerns, and preserved opportunities for future utility expansion. The lessons learned from the Case Road Bridge project will be directly applicable to the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project.

An additional advantage WEBB brings is our understanding that utility accommodation requirements play a significant role in bridge type selection and structural design. Utility facilities cannot simply be attached to a bridge after the structure has been designed. Instead, the size, number, and location of utility casings influence bridge span arrangements, girder type, superstructure depth, foundation locations, maintenance access requirements, and future expansion opportunities.

WEBB will work closely with EMWD during preliminary
engineering to identify the ultimate utility configuration and incorporate those requirements into the bridge alternatives evaluation and bridge type selection process.

Lessons Learned and Potential Solutions: Based on our
experience delivering bridge replacement projects throughout Southern California, WEBB has learned that utility coordination is most successful when initiated during preliminary engineering rather than final design. Early identification of utility constraints allows bridge geometry, foundation locations, utility crossings, and construction staging to be developed concurrently,
reducing project risk and avoiding costly redesign efforts.

Upon project initiation, WEBB will prepare a detailed utility inventory and utility conflict matrix identifying all existing and proposed EMWD facilities within the bridge corridor. We will work closely with EMWD to verify utility elevations, confirm casing requirements, evaluate foundation clearances, and establish a utility accommodation strategy that supports bridge construction and long-term maintenance.

As part of the preliminary engineering effort, WEBB will prepare preliminary utility plans through the 30% design level for the proposed recycled waterline and sewer force main accommodations within the bridge structure. This
effort will allow the bridge team and EMWD to verify utility casing locations, bridge utility corridors, maintenance access requirements, and potential conflicts with structural elements before bridge type selection is finalized. By advancing the utility design concurrently with bridge planning, we can ensure that utility requirements are fully incorporated into the preferred bridge alternative.

Potential EMWD Lines in Casings in the Bridge
WEBB will coordinate closely with EMWD throughout this
process and obtain EMWD concurrence on the proposed utility accommodation strategy during the preliminary engineering phase. Our preliminary assessment indicates that the recently installed recycled waterline and sewer force mains can likely remain operational during construction and that the bridge can be designed around these facilities. Once the new bridge structure is constructed, the utilities can be relocated into the permanent bridge utility corridor during Stage 2 construction.

This approach would preserve recently installed infrastructure, minimize service interruptions, reduce utility relocation costs, and improve overall project constructability.

The scope of this proposal includes utility accommodation planning and preliminary utility design through the 30% design level. Should the City and/or EMWD desire WEBB to prepare the final design, plans, specifications, and estimates for the utility facilities within the bridge structure, WEBB can provide a supplemental scope and fee proposal for those services at the appropriate stage of the project.

By integrating EMWD’s utility requirements into bridge type selection, foundation design, and construction staging from the beginning of the project, WEBB will minimize utility-related risks and help ensure successful delivery of the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project.

Proposed alignment of Goetz Road with bridge widening.

See exhibit in Appendix B for details.
692

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
11 Critical Issue #5: Goetz Road Realignment Conflict
with RCA Ownership and MSHCP Conservation Area
The Challenge: The proposed Goetz Road bridge replacement and roadway realignment will need to address potential
conflicts MSHCP Conservation Lands owned by the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and areas identified for future Conservation under the Western Riverside County MSHCP.

Based on the available mapping, the green area west/
southwest of Goetz Road is owned by the RCA and is
protected in perpetuity for Conservation and any disturbance, regardless of the use, we expect will require the City to replace that land should it be impacted by the Project.

Additionally, east of Goetz Road is described for Conservation in the MSHCP. Disturbance to this area may require additional replacement. The impacts of the proposed bridge and
realignment will be dealt with through the MSHCP Joint Project Review (JPR) process. Therefore, to control the length of time needed to get through the JPR process, The Project design must carefully evaluate the roadway alignment, bridge footprint, grading limits, drainage improvements, utilities, construction access, and staging areas to avoid and minimize impacts to conservation land and habitat connectivity along the San Jacinto River.

WEBB’s Advantage: WEBB understands that this issue is
more than an environmental constraint; it is a key design, right-of-way, permitting, and schedule challenge. Our team has extensive experience delivering roadway, bridge, drainage, trail, and utility projects within MSHCP constrained corridors.

We understand the importance of identifying the extent of infringement onto RCA ownership, MSHCP criteria cells and as well as the regulatory waters requirements early in the project development process.

WEBB’s advantage is our integrated approach. Our civil, bridge, drainage, environmental, utility, and right-of-way team will work together to develop a practical alignment that meets the City’s transportation needs while reducing impacts to the MSHCP conservation areas. Our local experience with RCA, Riverside County Flood Control, EMWD, and resource agency coordination will help the City identify issues early and avoid late-stage redesign or permitting delays.

WEBB’s Approach: WEBB will begin by overlaying the
proposed realignment, bridge footprint, grading limits, drainage improvements, utility work, construction access, and staging areas with RCA ownership and MSHCP conservation mapping.

This will allow the team to clearly identify permanent and temporary impacts and determine where the design can be refined to reduce conflicts.

During preliminary design, WEBB will evaluate alignment and bridge options that minimize encroachment into RCA-owned land and MSHCP conservation areas. This may include refining the roadway alignment, minimizing grading limits, adjusting slopes, limiting construction access, and coordinating drainage and utility improvements within the smallest feasible impact footprint.

WEBB will also coordinate early with RCA and applicable resource agencies so that they are aware of the Project’s impacts and discussion of replacement standards can be
identified early. If impacts cannot be fully avoided, WEBB will assist the City in identifying appropriate avoidance, minimization, restoration, replacement, compensation, or other agency-approved mitigation measures.

By acknowledging the RCA ownership and MSHCP
conservation impacts early with the wildlife and resource agencies, WEBB will help the City reduce permitting risk, define mitigation requirements, maintain the project schedule, and deliver a bridge replacement project that supports both transportation improvements and the long-term conservation goals of the San Jacinto River corridor.

Mapes Rd
San Jacinto River
Yosemite Ave Cabrillo Ct
Appalachian Dr
Watson Rd
San Jacinto River
Mapes Rd
Goetz Rd
Goetz Rd Goetz Rd
MSHCP Map APN
Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, WRCRCA, Vantor MSHCP Boundary
Parcel Information
Cities
Criteria Cells
MSHCP Covered Roads Right-of-Way

ARTERIAL
MAJOR

COLLECTOR
MSHCP Conserved Additional Reserve Lands
Additional Reserve Lands (ARL)
World Imagery
Low Resolution 15m Imagery
High Resolution 60cm Imagery
High Resolution 30cm Imagery
Citations

2.4m Resolution Metadata
5/6/2026, 11:18:10 AM
0 300 600 1,200 ft
0 90 180 360 m
1:7,820
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2025
693

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
12 Scope of Work
WEBB provides this scope of work for the City of Perris in support of the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project over San Jacinto River. Our team brings a depth of experience in bridge design and replacement, structural engineering, hydrology and hydraulic analysis, environmental permitting, traffic engineering, and civil engineering, ensuring a
comprehensive and efficient approach tailored to the project’s unique requirements.

By leveraging technical expertise and a solutions-driven mindset, WEBB is committed to delivering high-quality results that align with the City’s goals and project objectives.

TASK 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND

ADMINISTRATION
▶ 1.1 - Project Management
We will plan, organize, direct, and monitor project work activities and resources in accordance with the contract scope, schedule, and budget for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement project. This task involves ongoing general project management with the City, subconsultants, and stakeholders, including preparing contract documents, memos, letters, emails, and making phone calls, as well as maintaining project files. This activity commences after receipt of the Notice-to-Proceed, continues through the submittal of key final project deliverables, and concludes upon completion of construction and closeout.

For this scope of work, we assume a project duration of 36 months.
▶ 1.2 Meetings and Schedule
We will schedule and attend meetings in the planning phase as follows:
a. Kick-off Meeting including Subconsultants and Agencies b. Monthly Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings
We will schedule, chair, and prepare meeting agendas and minutes for all meetings. The agendas will be submitted to the City for review at least one working day before the meeting. The minutes will be distributed within five working days after the meeting to all attendees, all invited individuals, and the City’s Project Manager. The minutes shall include, but not be limited to, a list of attendees with phone numbers and contact emails, a summary of discussion items, a decision log, utility tracking sheets, any pertinent information, action items, and follow-up to action items.

We will prepare project schedules for the major phases
(Environmental Analysis, Preliminary Engineering, Final Design, Utility Coordination, and Construction Support) utilizing Microsoft Project. The project schedules will be divided into tasks and subtasks in full detail, including, but not limited to, City review timelines, critical path activities, and outside dependencies such as permits, utilities, and third-party agencies.
▶ 1.3 - Coordination with Subconsultants and Agencies
We will coordinate the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement
project with the City of Perris, RCFC&WCD, subconsultants, and other agencies, including EMWD, SCE, SoCalGas, and
communications providers. We will maintain project files and prepare memos, letters, emails, and other communications necessary to manage the project and support timely
environmental approvals and design development.
Deliverables
; Project Management
; PDT Meetings (assumption of 36 meetings)
; Meeting Agendas and Minutes (electronic)
; Monthly Status Reports (electronic)
; Project Schedules (three)
; Monthly Invoices
TASK 2 - UTILITY RESEARCH AND COORDINATION
▶ 2.1 - Data Compilation and Site Visit
We will contact Dig-Alert to secure an official ticket with contact information for all known utilities within the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement project limits. Record request forms will be sent to all utility owners requesting as-built facilities and available record drawings. Additional research will be performed with the City, EMWD, SCE, SoCalGas, and communications providers to identify the locations and potential existence of public and private utility facilities within the project limits. This will include water and sewer facilities, electrical distribution lines and poles, gas lines, and communication infrastructure. Research will also include the newly constructed facilities along Goetz Road from TPM 38518 (Perris Logistics Center South).

Upon compiling as-built information from utility owners, we will conduct a site visit to identify all existing improvements shown on the as-builts, verify their accuracy, and note facilities such as manholes and valves identified in the as-built plans but not visible in the field. These conditions will be flagged and sent to our project survey team. Additionally, follow-up discussions with the Utility Owners will occur for these cases to determine whether past improvement projects inadvertently paved over manhole/valve covers or adjusted utility locations without updated records.
▶ 2.2 - Utility Conflict Mapping and Utility Relocation Coordination and Agreements
We will utilize as-built data and maps obtained from the utility companies to prepare existing utility base mapping and
identify all utilities on the plans within the project limits. The utility mapping developed for the PS&E will be verified through topographic surveys.

During the design development, high- and low-risk facilities will be identified, and a Utility Conflict Matrix will be developed to record the findings and begin coordinating with the utility owners. We will provide all correspondence and communication efforts to the City upon completion of the final design.

Coordination with SCE
• Provide coordination with SCE for street improvement
and bridge construction along Goetz Road.
• Provide CAD files and improvement plans to SCE to
facilitate their review and relocation design, as needed. • Assist the City with preparing cost estimates and
agreements for any electrical relocations.
• Review SCE’s potential design and incorporate changes into the street and bridge improvement plans.
• Prepare all required SCE applications for submittal,
including service relocations, underground services,
and/or new services for streetlights.
694

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
13 Coordination with EMWD
• Provide coordination with EMWD for work impacting
water, recycled water, and sewer facilities.
• Provide coordination with EMWD for relocation and
adjustment of manhole covers, water valve covers, and
air-vacs within the impacted areas of Goetz Road.
• Assist the City and EMWD in preparing relocation and
betterment agreements, as applicable.
• Coordinate with EMWD for review and approval of
improvements within EMWD easements and for any
facilities impacted by roadway, bridge, and associated
improvements.

Coordination with SoCalGas, Charter, Verizon, and Other Utility Companies
We will assist the City with Utility Conflict Mapping. We will perform the typical “ABC” process of utility letters, which includes:
• Utility “A” Letter: Record request forms will be sent to each utility to request as-built mapping of their
facilities as discussed in Task 3.1 above.
• Utility “B” Letter: Maps showing the utility mapping
and the proposed improvements will be sent to the
utility companies for verification.
• Utility “C” Letter: Final plans, along with a letter, will be sent to the utility companies showing the existing
utilities and the final design.

We will identify all known utilities that potentially conflict with the planned project improvements and determine special
requirements for facilities, including protection, relocation, right-of-way easements, and construction constraints. We will meet with utility companies and assist them with preparation of utility relocation plans, contracts, and letters of agreement.

We will coordinate with utility companies to schedule utility relocations before the start of construction, where feasible, and to sequence relocations with the City’s construction phasing. ▶ 2.3 - Utility Potholing
Potholing will be performed to locate utilities that may pose conflicts in high-risk areas, including where drainage facilities, bridge work, EMWD water/sewer improvements, multi-use
paths, and other underground facilities are proposed. We have retained an underground investigation subconsultant to determine the depths, material types, and sizes of known critical facilities. Upon completion of all pothole services, the project survey team will be notified to field- survey each potholed location. It is assumed that a maximum of 20
potholes, distributed at critical conflict locations along Goetz Road, will be performed for this project and are included in the scope of work; this assumption can be refined in coordination with the City during design.
Deliverables
; Records obtained from the City and outside agencies
; Utility locations shown on the base mapping
; Certified List of Utilities per Dig-Alert
; Utility Conflict Mapping Procedure (“ABC” Letters)
; Utility Exhibits, Contracts, Agreement Letters
; Utility Pothole Field Surveys and Summary
TASK 3 - SURVEYING AND BASE MAP

PREPARATION
▶ 3.1 - Field Topographic Survey
Our survey subconsultant will perform the following tasks before the commencement of field surveying activities:
• Field locate and recover an existing benchmark and
establish a survey datum for the project. Vertical
datum shall be based on the North American Vertical
Datum of 1988 (NAVD88), and Horizontal control will
be North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) State Plan
Coordinates, Zone VI, unless otherwise requested.
• Conduct field topographic survey of project limits to obtain existing ground surface elevations along Goetz
Road, extending 200 feet beyond the right-of-way
on both sides of the street, to include existing curb,
gutter flowline, crown line, edge of pavement, ADA
ramps, driveways, median, meters, catch basins,
utilities boxes/vaults, overhead utility lines, walls, fence, landscaped areas, streetlights, and utility poles, also to include existing bridge features, piers, slab, walls, channel area under bridge, abutments, etc.
• Provide a minimum 1” = 40’ scale digital topographic
survey of the project areas with one-foot contours.
• Process and draft field survey data and prepare
electronic CAD files for the existing ground features
(FT) file, Civil 3D existing ground surface (TO) file, and existing plan (XP) file for design teams’ use
▶ 3.2 - Alignment / ROW Mapping
• Utilizing available public records research tools,
research and compile reference materials pertaining to
the alignment, including reference Record Maps, Corner
Records, Tie Sheets, Right-of-Way, and Easement
Documents.
• Perform a field survey to locate and recover existing survey monuments and establish survey control for the
project. Horizontal control and basis of bearings shall be based on the California State Plane Coordinate
System, North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83), Zone
VI.
• Utilizing available record data obtained from public
records research, together with copies of deeds/rightof-way dedications provided by the City of Perris, analyze and map the right-of-way lines for the project
alignment and compare the measured right-of-way
distances to record distances to ensure reasonable
horizontal control (if record distances are not available, measured distances to the adjacent record monuments
will be shown).
• Prepare a base map delineating existing right-of-way
lines obtained from our records research, field survey
data, and documents provided by the City of Perris.

Documents used to establish property/right-of-way
lines will be noted.

Right-of-Way will be mapped based on available record data.

Existing right-of-way dedicated by separate document(s) shall be provided by the City of Perris. Cost to obtain and provide Title Reports to identify and obtain right-of-way documents is not included in this scope of work.

This scope of work does not include a record of survey. If it becomes necessary to file a record of survey and/or set survey monuments, separate authorization will be needed.
695

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
14 Deliverables
; TO CAD file with Civil 3D surface for design
; XP CAD file with existing planimetric linework
; Electronic PDF of Alignment/ROW Survey
; PB CAD file with existing ROW, easements, and
centerlines for design
TASK 4 - RIGHT OF WAY ANALYSIS
▶ 4.1 - Right of Way Analysis
We will use the right-of-way and topographic information gathered and assembled in Task 3 to prepare a preliminary (30%) design of the project improvements. The proposed
improvements will be digitally overlaid on the existing right-ofway boundaries to determine impacts to the right-of-way. In addition, areas for potential temporary construction easements, permanent utility easements, and permanent roadway
easements will be determined. An exhibit will be prepared at 1”=40’ scale to illustrate right-of-way impacts and easements, along with the approximate square footage of each. Square footage to be shown per impacted parcel with separated areas for right-of-way impacts and easement areas.

Right-of-way acquisition activities, legal and plat preparation, offer package preparation, and appraisals are not included in this scope. Once right-of-way impacts are finalized during design, a separate scope and budget can be prepared upon the City’s request.
Deliverables
; Right-of-way impact exhibit in PDF format
TASK 5 - GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Our geotechnical subconsultant, EMI, will perform the following tasks as part of their geotechnical analysis for the Goetz Road Bridge.
▶ 5.1 - Preliminary Foundation Report
EMI will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Report (PFR) to provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations to assist structural designers during Bridge Type Selection. This PFR will be prepared using the available subsurface data, and the format will be in accordance with the current Caltrans Guidelines.
▶ 5.2 - Geotechnical Investigation
Per AASHTO requirements, one soil boring is required at each bridge support location where the substructure width is less than 100 feet. Four borings are proposed: one 70-foot-deep boring near each abutment and one 100-foot-deep boring near each proposed pier. The pier boring will be advanced through the existing bridge deck. In addition, two shallow hand-auger borings, each less than 5 feet deep, will be performed, with one boring on each side of the bridge. The proposed exploration depths may be extended if refusal is encountered prior to reaching the planned depth. The boreholes will be excavated using a track- or truck-mounted drill rig. Asphalt cold patch or rapid-set concrete will be used to restore disturbed pavement or bridge deck areas.

EMI will prepare a boring location plan, and this plan will be used to secure an encroachment permit from the City of Perris.

Any other permits, if required, will be secured by WEBB in conjunction with the City.

EMI field personnel will collect soil samples for laboratory testing, including bulk samples of shallow soils, and small disturbed and relatively undisturbed ring samples of deeper soils. The small disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be collected using split-spoon samplers at a vertical interval of about 5 feet, alternating between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and the Modified California Drive (MCD) sampler. Samples of subsurface soils will be logged during the field investigation, secured in their containers or collected in plastic bags, and transported to the EMI laboratory.
▶ 5.3 - Laboratory Testing
Borehole field logs will be reviewed to select representative soil samples for laboratory testing. Various laboratory tests will be performed on soil samples to determine or derive their physical and engineering characteristics. Anticipated laboratory tests include: in-situ density and moisture content, grain size, direct shear, UU triaxial, consolidation, and soil corrosion tests.

Laboratory tests will be conducted in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards or California Test methods.
▶ 5.4 - Geotechnical Engineering Analyses
Results from field investigations and laboratory testing will be used to characterize subsurface soils and conditions and to create idealized soil profiles for design purposes. The following analyses will be performed for the project:
• Evaluation of seismicity and estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration based on the Caltrans design criteria, and recommendation of an ARS curve for bridge structural
design.
• Assessment of soil liquefaction potential, seismic
settlement, and lateral spreading.
• Foundation analysis for a bridge.
• Evaluation of soil corrosivity conditions and
recommendations for mitigation measures.
• Design of pavement structural section in accordance
with the Caltrans method.
▶ 5.5 - Foundation Report Preparation
EMI will prepare a Foundation Report to provide bridge
foundation design and construction recommendations. EMI will address any comments resulting from the City of Perris review and prepare a final Foundation Report.
Deliverables
; Preliminary Foundation Report
; Boring Location Plan
; Draft and Final Foundation Report
TASK 6 - VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED SCREENING
▶ 6.1 - VMT Analysis
It is expected that the project will screen out from conducting a full VMT modeling analysis per the City’s adopted
VMT guidelines. This is due to the short-length widening improvements, the inclusion of active transportation facilities, and conformance with the General Plan. A VMT screening
memo will be prepared, including a project overview and description, a VMT screening threshold analysis, and a
conclusion on the screening results.

An optional task for VMT modeling analysis is provided if it is determined that the project does not qualify for a full VMT modeling analysis.
696

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
15 Deliverables
; VMT Screening Memo
TASK 7 - ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
▶ 7.1 - Environmental Kickoff Meeting
WEBB will prepare an agenda and coordinate the
Environmental kickoff meeting for the project; which may be a separate meeting from the overall Kickoff meeting with engineering teams. This meeting will also include the Team biologists from ECORP to discuss site access, survey timing as well as to discuss the MSHCP compliance issues.
Deliverables
; Environmental kickoff meeting agenda
▶ 7.2 - Project Description (WEBB)
Once the City has conceptually approved the PDR, WEBB’s Environmental team will compile a detailed Project Description for review and approval by the City. The Project Description will be used as the basis for the technical analyses outlined in Task 3, as well as the basis of the Initial Study in Task 4. When the Project Description is approved by the City, the environmental scope of work outlined in Task 4 will commence. The only Technical studies that can start before the Project Description has been approved are Tasks 3.2 through 3.4.
Deliverables
; Project Description
▶ 7.3 - Technical Studies (WEBB)
The following technical studies will need to be prepared to address the proposed Project. Based on the City’s Guidelines, we have determined that the bridge replacement would be exempt from having to perform vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis. Therefore, no VMT quantitative analysis is included based on this assumption. Detailed scopes of work are
provided in Appendix A.
• 7.1 Air Quality/Energy/Greenhouse Gas Study
• 7.2 MSHCP Consistency Analysis and Report (ECORP)
» 7.2.1 Focused Plant Surveys
» 7.2.2 Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys
» 7.2.3 Crotch’s bumble bee Surveys
• 7.3 DBESP (ECORP)
• 7.4 Jurisdictional Delineation (ECORP)
• 7.6 Cultural Resources Assessment and Paleontological Memo (Applied Earthworks)
Deliverables
; Project Description
▶ 7.4 - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
WEBB will prepare an Initial Study Checklist with the approved project description in Task 2 and the technical studies outlined above in Task 3. It is assumed the Project will be able to mitigate potentially significant impacts to below a level of significance; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) is anticipated. Should there be any impacts that
cannot be mitigated, and an Environmental Impact Report is required, WEBB will notify the City so that a change in contract authorization can be prepared.

Two rounds of review of the MND are included in our scope of screen check drafts. One “proof” copy of the MND will be provided for the City to approve for the release of the 30-day Public Review period. The following scope will be completed by WEBB:
• Prepare Initial Study Checklist/MND; up to 2 Screen
checks included; more screen checks will require a
Change Order.
• Prepare Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) and Notice of Completion (NOC) for
filing at the State Clearinghouse website and County
Clerk’s office.
• Prepare distribution list for City to approve
• Mail/disseminate the NOI to up to 30 recipients to be sent via FedEx
• Prepare response to comments (not exceeding a total
of 30 responses requiring more than “no comment”;
regardless of how many letters received)
• Prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
• Prepare a Final MND which includes the response to
comments, MMRP, and public review MND. Up to 2
screen checks are included; more screen checks will
require a Change Order.
• Prepare Notice of Determination (NOD) for City to sign; file within 5 days of City adoption of the MND. WEBB
will file NOD with the State Clearinghouse and the
County Clerk.
• Up to 120 hours allocated for meetings and
coordination with the WEBB engineering team and
the City. Once this hour allocation is exceeded by the
Environmental Team, a Change Order will be required.
Deliverables
; Initial Study Checklist
; Mitigated Negative Declaration
; Notice of Intent and Notice of Completion
; Distribution List
; Response to Comments
; Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
; Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
; Notice of Determination
▶ 7.5 - Regulatory Permitting (WEBB)
After the NOD is filed as described in Task 4 and based on the findings of the Jurisdictional Delineation (Task 3.4) and the engineering designs of the PDR, WEBB will prepare and submit the regulatory permit applications with the appropriate agencies. We anticipate approvals from the following agencies will be required: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act for discharges of dredge or fill to Waters of the U.S.; Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) pursuant to Section 401
of the Clean Water Act; and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) pursuant to Section 1600 et seq. of the Fish and Game Code for impacts to riparian and streambed habitat. Certain technical studies prepared for the 30% design including hydrology/hydraulic studies, biological surveys, and engineering designs will be included in the permit applications.

The RWQCB application requires preparation of an Alternative Analysis, Temporary Impacts Restoration Plan, and Draft Compensatory Mitigation Plan, which are included in our budget. The application fees associated with the CDFW and RWQCB applications will be requested separately and are not included in this budget. The City will review, approve, and sign each application before submittal. WEBB will track the reviews of each permit and follow-up on a regular basis with each regulatory agency. Once the approvals are secured, this task is completed. This task does not include additional studies associated with offsite permittee-responsible mitigation, longterm management plans, habitat mitigation and monitoring 697

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
16 plans, mitigation negotiations, or construction reporting to the regulatory agencies. This budget also assumes that Goetz Road Bridge was not constructed as (or funded as) a federal Civil Works Project and therefore does not include a Clean Water Act Section 408 Permit.
Deliverables
; Regulatory Permit Applications
TASK 8 - HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS
Bridge Crossing Design - The bridge design for the project is envisioned to include a longer span and a raised profile to accommodate a 10-Year flood condition while minimizing impacts to environmentally sensitive areas.
▶ 8.1 - Hydrology Analysis
WEBB will prepare an updated hydraulic analysis of the
watershed. The preparation of such a study will include the following elements:
a. Watershed and Subarea Delineation
b. Ultimate Land Use Analysis
c. Existing and Proposed Detention Basin Analysis
d. NOAA 14 Rainfall Analysis (will use NOAA 2 if directed by the City and RCFC&WCD)
e. HEC-HMS Model Development
f. Exhibit Preparation
g. Hydraulic Analysis Report
▶ 8.2 - Hydraulic Analysis
Consistent with the Structure Type Selection Report, we will evaluate two different structure types for the proposed bridge.

For both alternatives, we will evaluate:
i. Bridge Hydraulics - a two-dimensional HEC-RAS model
will be prepared to evaluate existing conditions and each alternative. If a unit hydrograph is available, we will utilize it for each alternative. If not available, we will run the model in quasi-steady state, simulating the peak flow rate until it reaches equilibrium.
ii. Bridge Scour Analysis - WEBB will prepare scour
calculations using HEC- 14 methodologies and the soil
sample analysis prepared with the geotechnical study.
iii. Opinion of Probable Cost - WEBB will prepare an
Opinion of Probable Cost for each alternative based on our construction cost database.
iv. Alternatives Analysis Report - WEBB will prepare an Alternatives Analysis report for the two bridge crossing alternatives. Based on the results, WEBB will recommend a Preferred Crossing Alternative to the City for this project. ▶ 8.3 - Bridge Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
A Hydrology and Hydraulic Report will be prepared to provide Engineering Backup for bridge design. It is anticipated that a draft report will be submitted with the 60% Submittal and a final report with the 90% Submittal.
Deliverables
; Hydrology Review Memorandum
; Bridge Scour Analysis Results
; Opinion of Probable Cost for the East alternative
; Alternatives Analysis Report
; Bridge Hydrology and Hydraulic Report (Draft and Final) TASK 9 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING (30%

DESIGN)
▶ 9.1- Structure Type Selection Report
Mark Thomas will prepare a Structure Type Selection Report to assist the City in determining the best-suited structure type for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement. The Type
Selection Report will discuss geotechnical, hydraulic, seismic, constructability, aesthetic, utility, and drainage issues related to the structure. Existing bridge as-built plans and Bridge Inspection Reports (BIR) will be reviewed. Two different structure types will be considered in the report, which will include a General Plan, Foundation Plan, and General Plan Estimate for each structure alternative. It is assumed that one round of City comments will be addressed.
Deliverables
; Structure Type Selection Report
▶ 9.2 - Preliminary Street and Grading Design (30%)
WEBB will utilize all gathered topographic, utility, right-of-way, and bridge design information to prepare preliminary street and grading plans. Street alignment and roadway geometrics will be per the latest edition of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual to ensure adequate radii and design features are incorporated for safety and user comfort. It is expected that the proposed Goetz Road realignment will tie in front of Goetz Park to the south and several hundred feet north of the end of Perris Logistics Center South’s currently ongoing widening project. Preliminary street and grading plans to be at 1”=40’ scale and include the proposed street alignment, bridge structure, proposed trails and sidewalk locations, approximate extent of roadside grading, roadway centerline profile, existing right of way, and key dimensions.
Deliverables
; 30% Street and Grading Plans
▶ 9.3 - Preliminary Signing and Striping Design (30%)
WEBB will prepare preliminary striping plans for the project, including up to 100’ beyond the expected end of roadway improvements. Striping designs to be per the latest California MUTCD to ensure roadway marking consistency and user
safety. Signage is not expected that proposed signage will be a part of these plans. Preliminary signing & striping plans to be at 1”=40’ scale and include the proposed striping layout with curve and taper dimensions, pavement markings, accurate striping line types, and lane width dimensions.
Deliverables
; 30% Striping Plans
▶ 9.4 - Preliminary EMWD Water and Sewer Force Main Design (30%) WEBB will prepare preliminary plans for the relocation and realignment of the EMWD 12” waterline, 10” sewer force
main, and 6” sewer force main. These three lines will be raised to properly attach to the proposed bridge structure. In 698

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
17 addition, the lines will be realigned to fit between the bridge girders. Plans will be prepared at 1”=40’ scale and include pipe alignment, pipe encasement sizing, angle point locations, potential blow off and air vac locations, and pipe profiles.

Design to be per latest EMWD standards and requirements. Deliverables
; 30% EMWD Water and Sewer Plans
TASK 10 - COMMUNITY OUTREACH
▶ 10.1 - Community Outreach Coordination
The full extent of community outreach is currently to be determined. However, it is expected that an effort to coordinate with the City regarding outreach scope, area, and any
community outreach meetings and activities will be required.

Per the Q&A dated May 27, 2026, 8 hours of coordination effort have been assigned to this task.
Deliverables
; Coordination with the City
Phase 2
TASK 1 - PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATE
(65%, 95%, AND 100%)
We will prepare a complete set of construction plans for the proposed Goetz Road Bridge Replacement project. The City will review plans at 65%, 95%, and 100% (or as otherwise directed). Final plans shall be submitted in an “D”- size (24” x 36”) electronic submittal in CAD and PDF formats. We will prepare project technical specifications for the proposed improvements for the City’s review with the 95% and 100% PS&E submittals. Specifications shall be prepared in a Cityapproved format and include the bid schedule. The City will provide the front-end bid documents, contract, and general provisions.

We will provide an Engineer’s Estimate of probable construction costs with the PS&E submittals. The estimates will be prepared in Microsoft Excel and include sufficient bid items, approved by the City, for contractors to properly bid on the intended scope of work. The scope of work for this task consists of the following:
▶ 1.1 - Street, Drainage, and Grading Improvement Plans The improvement plans will show existing roadway
improvements, driveway approaches, edge of pavement,
sewer manholes, water valve and gas valve lids, electrical vaults, air-vacs, cross gutters, pedestrian ramps, curb returns, and underground utilities. New improvements include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, multi-use trails, street and drainage facilities, medians, and all facility or structure adjustments to be performed by the contractor (including water valves, gas valves, sewer manholes, communications manholes,
electrical manholes, etc.). All relocations, reconstructions, or modifications shall be shown in full tone with appropriate construction notes, detail references, or standard plan references. Curb access ramps and driveways within the
project limits shall be upgraded to comply with the latest ADA standards. Construction notes will be arranged so the first notes are “protect in place,” followed by “removal” notes, and ending with the actual work. Notes of a similar nature will be grouped together.

Roadway cross sections at key locations will be provided.

Demolition plan sheets and notes will be separate from the improvement plan sheets for clarity. Design details for all ADA curb ramps, driveways, and key locations will be provided and include elevations, grades, and tie-in points. Grading areas will be shown with slope elevations and grades. Roadway centerline and top-of-curb profiles will be provided for all roadway improvement areas. Roadway improvement plans to tie into separate proposed bridge structure plans.

A drainage report will also be prepared and submitted with the plans at each submittal to support the street drainage design. It will include street hydrology, street capacity, inlet sizing calculations, and pipe hydraulic calculations per City and County requirements.

A TPG report will be prepared and submitted to the City for review at each plan submittal. The project is not required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). However, as a transportation project, it is still required to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). For this project, the right of way is constrained, and there is a limited area within the right of way available for water quality treatment features. Therefore, it is assumed that water quality requirements will be met by providing catch basin inserts. This approach has been accepted to meet the MEP requirement of the Riverside County Transportation Project Guidance (TPG) Document.

There are no existing storm drain facilities south of the bridge to capture street flows. The planned MDP facility Romoland Line A-15 is within the project area and is proposed to outlet into the San Jacinto River. Since the bridge replacement project will impact the street, curb, and outlet areas, it is proposed to construct a portion of the ultimate A-15 line and the outlet structure at this time to simplify construction and minimize disruptions in the future. In addition, the drainage facilities will capture street flows near the low point which are currently left to drain into the dirt shoulders.

The street and drainage improvement plans will typically include:
• Title Sheet
• Construction Notes
• Standard Project Notes
• Typical Cross Sections
• Existing Utilities 1” = 40’
• Demolition Plans 1” = 40’
• Street Improvement Plans and Profiles 1” = 40’
• Drainage Improvement Plans and Profiles 1” = 40’
• Curb Return / Ramp Details 1” = 10’
• Driveway Details 1” = 10’
• Construction Details 1” = 10’
▶ 1.2 - Structure Design
Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations and plans for the selected bridge alternative. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that replacement with a three-span, precast concrete slab bridge on circular multi-column pier is the preferred structure alternative. The structure design will be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition, with the California Amendments and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 2.1. The 2026 Caltrans Standards and current versions of the Caltrans Structure Technical Policies and Bridge Design Manuals will be used.

Bridge alignment will be coordinated with the adjacent street improvement design plans. It is assumed that the following plan sheets will be prepared:
699

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
18 Sheet Description # of Sheets
General Plan 1
Index To Plans 1
Stage Construction Plans 1
Foundation Plan 1
Abutment Layout 2
Abutment Details 3
Pier Layout 1
Pier Details 3
Typical Section 1
Girder Layout 1
Girder Details 3
Drainage Details 1
Railing Details 1
Sidewalk Joint Details 1
Miscellaneous Details 1
Log of Test Borings 3
Total Structure Sheets 25
▶ 1.3 - Structure Independent Check (95% Plans)
City comments from the 65% submittal will be addressed and incorporated into the 95% design. Responses to comments will be prepared and submitted.

Mark Thomas will perform an independent design check of the structure in conformance with Caltrans bridge design procedures. The independent check will be completed by
an engineer who was not involved in the original design of the structure. Calculations will be performed to check the bridge layouts and structural integrity. Upon completion of the independent check, discrepancies between the designer and checker will be reconciled, and the plans will be updated. ▶ 1.4 - Signing and Striping Plans
Signing and striping plans shall be prepared in a 1” = 40’ scale format and will show existing and proposed striping, pavement legends, sign types and locations, and all other ancillary details.

Bicycle improvements will be incorporated to provide smooth transitions between differing bicycle facility types. The corridor improvements will also be analyzed to determine if additional warning signage is needed for curves and driveways. The signing & striping plans will conform with Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications, CAMUTCD standards, and the City of Perris’ most current design standards.
▶ 1.5 - Street Light Plans
Visual Concepts will conduct a photometric analysis of Goetz Road and the proposed bridge to determine street light
locations. A plan will be prepared at 1”=40’ scale showing existing and proposed street light locations, service pedestal locations and power sources, conduit runs, pull boxes, and construction quantities. It is anticipated that the proposed street lights will follow the City and Caltrans standards for equipment and construction. Plans will be prepared for
the 65%, 95%, and Final submittals. Cost estimates and
specifications for street lighting will be provided at the 95% and Final submittals.
▶ 1.6 - Technical Specifications
The City of Perris will provide its boilerplate Specifications and Technical Provisions in Microsoft Word format. We will compile the project specifications, including the project-specific scope of work in the Technical Specifications, and provide Special Technical Provisions beyond the City’s standard Technical Provisions, as needed. WEBB will provide a bid schedule, special provisions, and technical specifications at the 95% and Final submittals. The specifications shall be signed by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, certifying that the specifications are complete and ready for bidding. The latest edition of the Caltrans Standard Specifications will be used on the project.
▶ 1.7 - Construction Cost Estimate
We will provide a construction quantity and cost estimate with each set of plans submitted. The unit costs shall be based on the most recent cost information for similar projects in the area, compiled by us and approved by the City. The estimated items of work with quantities shall include, but not be limited to, itemizing all removals, clearing and grubbing, relocations, bridge structures, sidewalk, curb and gutter, driveway
approaches, asphalt concrete (AC), utility improvements, application/painting of pavement legends and striping, signs, traffic control, street lights, and drainage improvements. The estimates will also include probable costs for utility relocations, right-of-way, and temporary construction easements.
Deliverables
; 65%, 95%, and Final Street, Drainage, and Grading
Improvement Plans
; 65%, 95%, and Final Structure Plans
; 65%, 95%, and Final Signing & Striping Plans
; 65%, 95%, and Final Street Light Plans
; 95% and Final Technical Specifications and Special
Provisions
; 65%, 95% and Final Construction Cost Estimates
TASK 2 - BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
(T&M)
WEBB will support the project throughout the bidding process and construction to ensure the project is completed smoothly and successfully. It is assumed the City will pay for Tribal Monitoring, if required.
▶ 2.1 - Pre-Bid Meeting
WEBB will attend up to 1 pre-bid meeting with the City, prospective bidders, and other stakeholders to provide
background on the project and answer any questions. It is expected that the pre-bid meetings will be held at Perris City Hall or at the project site.
▶ 2.2 - Response to Bidders’ Inquiries
WEBB will provide official electronic responses to bidder inquiries during the bidding period. It is expected that the City will facilitate the receipt and distribution of questions and responses. WEBB aims to provide responses to inquiries within 48 hours of receipt. Addenda to the PS&E documents will be prepared during the advertisement period, if required.
▶ 2.3 - Pre-Construction Meetings
WEBB will attend up to 1 pre-construction meeting with the City, contractors, and other stakeholders to provide technical support and information and to answer any questions. It is expected that the pre-construction meetings will be held at Perris City Hall or at the project site.
▶ 2.4 - Review Equipment and Materials Submittals
WEBB will review equipment and material submittals (up to 20) throughout the course of project construction. Reviews will verify submittal compliance with plans, specifications, and the intent of the project. It is expected that the City will facilitate 700

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
19 the receipt and distribution of the submittals. WEBB aims to provide submittal review responses within 72 hours of receipt. ▶ 2.5 - Response to RFIs and Contractor Change Orders
WEBB will respond to contractor RFIs and change orders (up to 10) throughout the course of roadway construction. Mark Thomas will respond to contractor RFIs (up to 6) and change orders (up to 2). It is expected that the City will facilitate the receipt and distribution of RFIs, change order requests, and responses. WEBB aims to provide RFI responses within 72 hours of receipt and change order responses within 96 hours of receipt.
▶ 2.6 - Final Record Drawings
WEBB and Mark Thomas will review contractor markups
and RFIs upon receipt at the end of construction. WEBB and Mark Thomas will conduct field reviews of the project to verify conditions and deviations from the plans. We assume no
responsibility for the accuracy of the information provided by the contractor. WEBB and Mark Thomas will prepare as-built record drawings of the plans and submit them to the City within 45 days of receipt of markups.
▶ 2.7 - Resident Engineer Pending File
Mark Thomas will compile the necessary documents to be
included in the RE Pending file, including the typical information below:
• Joint Movement Rating Calculations for bridge
expansion joints (using Caltrans Form DSD-D-0129)
prepared in accordance with Bridge Memo to
Designers.
• Quantity summary sheets for Bar Reinforcing, Concrete, Piles, Miscellaneous Metal, Structure Excavation, and
Structure Backfill. Summary sheets are prepared in
accordance with Bridge Design Aids.
• Special instructions or information from the Designer to the Resident Engineer/Structure Representative. As a
minimum, this should include the following:
» The intent of the designer where misinterpretation
of contract documents is possible
» Alerts to details or sequences.
• As-Built plans for existing structures.
• 1” = 4’ Deck Contour Plots (4-Scales) prepared in
accordance with Bridge Memo to Designers
Deliverables
; Attendance at Pre-Bid and Pre-Construction Meetings
; Responses to Bidder Inquiries
; Review Equipment and Materials Submittals
; Responses to Contractor RFIs and Change Order
Requests
; Final Record Drawings
; Resident Engineer Pending File
TASK 3 - OPTIONAL ITEMS
▶ 3.1 - Vehicle Miles Traveled Modeling
If required by the City, a VMT modeling analysis will be conducted to determine the VMT impacts from adding roadway capacity. VMT modeling is to utilize the latest version of RIVCOM, as provided by WRCOG. The model will be updated to reflect the “With Project” conditions. Analysis scenarios include Base Year (2018) with and without Project, along with Future Year (2045) with and without Project. The results of the model runs will be compared with the City of Perris’ baseline VMT thresholds, per the City’s adopted VMT guidelines. If necessary, appropriate mitigation measures to reduce VMT impact will be recommended per the latest CAPCOA handbook.

A VMT report will summarize the methodology, findings, and recommendations of the modeling analysis and be submitted to the City for review, comment, and approval.
701

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
20 Proposed Staffing Plan, Qualifications, and Organization We have assembled a project team of highly experienced engineering and technical personnel with extensive experience with bridge replacement and infrastructure projects.

Our Principal in Charge, Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE, and Project Manager, Nick Lowe, PE, TE, have worked on multiple bridge design and delivery projects together and are committed to providing the hands-on leadership the City needs for this project. We guarantee that our key personnel will be available for the entire project. We understand the importance of consistency and agree not to remove or replace any designated ‘key’ personnel without prior written approval from the City.

Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Senior Vice President
C 65078, TE 2112
Executive Oversight / QA/QC City Liason

PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Nick Lowe, PE, TE
Deputy Director
C 87666, TE 3065
Project Delivery / Schedule / Budget /
Agency and Utility Coordination

PROJECT MANAGER

BRIDGE &

STRUCTURES
LEAD
Lynn Odgiiv, PE,
SE
Structural Engineering
Lead
Mark Thomas
Bridge Design and
Engineering
Caltrans Criteria
Type Selection / PS&E
Bridge Aesthetics

HYDROLOGY &

HYDRAULICS
LEAD
Joseph Caldwell,

PE, CPESC,

CPSWQ, QSD,

QSP, CFM
Practice Area Leader
C 67239
Hydraulic and
Hydrologic Modeling
Floodplain / Floodway
Analysis
Scour Analysis
Drainage and
Stormwater Design

HEC-RAS / HEC-HMS
Water Quality (BMPs)

UTILITY

COORDINATION
LEAD
Deborah Saulina
Project Coordinator
Utility Identification
and Mapping
Potholing / Conflict
Analysis
Utility Agency
Coordination
Relocation / Protection
Strategies

TRAFFIC &

TRANSPORTATION
LEAD
Myung Choo, PE,
TE
Practice Area Leader
C 79651, TE 2451
Traffic Analysis and
Forecasting
Roadway Design /
Caltrans Standards
Complete Streets /
Multi-Use Trails
Signing and Striping
TMP Support

SURVEY/ROW
LEAD
Jason Ardery, PE,

TE, LLS, CPESC,

QSD, QSP
Deputy Director
C 71508, TE 2618, LLS
9329
Topographic Survey /
Mapping
Base Maps / Aerial
Control
Right-of-Way Support
Parcel / Easement
Mapping
PUBLIC

OUTREACH
Scott Hildebrandt,
PE
Chief Strategy Officer
C 44762
Stakeholder
Engagement
Community
Coordination
Outreach Strategy
Public Notifications
Geotechnical Services
Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical Engineering & Foundation Design
Biological Studies
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Biological Resources / MSHCP Compliance
Cultural Resources
Applied Earthworks
Cultural Resources Compliance
Structural Bridge Design
Mark Thomas
Structural Design/Peer Review/Caltrans PS&E
Support

SPECIALTY SUBCONSULTANTS

ENVIRONMENTAL
& PERMITTING
LEAD
Stephanie
Standerfer
Vice President
CEQA/Environmental
Documentation
Agency Permitting

USACE/CDFW/RWQCB
Coordination
MSHCP Compliance
Regulatory Strategy
VMT Analysis
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Transportation /VMT Analysis
Subsurface Utility Engineering
T2 Utility Engineering
Utility Engineering
Lighting Design and Electrical
Engineering
Visual Concepts Lighting
Electrical Engineering
Dry Utility Coordination and Design
RGI Utility Consultants
Dry Utility
702

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
21 Key Personnel Assignments and Availability
Key Personnel Proposed Role on This
Project Current Assignments Assignment Anticipated End Date Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE Principal In Charge
Arts and Music Line, CVAG
Avenue 50/Jackson Street, City of Indio
PLC North Infrastructure Improvements
March 2027
December 2026
June 2027
Nick Lowe, PE, TE Project Manager
Avenue 50 Phase 1, City of Indio
Avenue 50 Phase 2, City of Indio
Indio Boulevard, City of Indio
Urban Greening, City of Coachella
HSIP Cycle 12 Improvements, City of Lake Elsinore
September 2026
May 2027
December 2026
February 2027
April 2027
Scott Hildebrandt, PE Community Outreach
Hillwood Development, SCCII
Moorpark Battery Storage Facility
San Jacinto River Master Plan, RCFCD
December 2026
Prologis ending June 2027
On-going
Joseph Caldwell, PE,

CPESC, CPSWQ, QSD,

QSP, CFM
Hydrology and Hydraulics Lead
Avenue 50 Bridge, City of La Quinta
Master Plan Update, PVSD
Moreno MDP Line K Plan Check, RCFC&WCD
Bear Creek Diversion and Lift Station
LOMR FEMA Processing
Limonite Crossing, City of Jurupa Valley
Brookside Channel - Technical Oversight
Wilson Creek LOMR
Through the end of the year
September 2026
Through 2027
July 2027
Through the end of the year
Through 2027
Through 2027
October 2026
Stephanie Standerfer Environmental and Permitting Lead
Responsible for various Environmental Department projects; role is in oversight and QA/QC of environmental projects firmwide; availability for Goetz Road Project is 35%.

Completion dates vary
Lynn Odgiiv, PE, SE Bridge and Structures Lead
La Novia Ave Bridge Replacement PA&ED, City of San Juan Capistrano
Nuevo Rd Bridge Replacement, RCTD
Venta Spur JOST Trail Pedestrian Overcrossing, City of Irvine Citywide BPMP. City of San Juan Capistrano
January 2027
December 2027
December 2026
September 2026
The percentage of time allocated for each key personnel member proposed for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project has been carefully determined in full consideration of their current project commitments and anticipated end dates. WEBB confirms that no active assignments will conflict with the dedication and availability required to successfully deliver both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of this project. All key personnel will be available to the extent proposed for the full duration of the project, and WEBB commits to not removing or replacing any designated key personnel without the prior written approval of the City of Perris. 703

DILESH SHETH, PE, TE
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE, is the Senior Vice President and Director of WEBB’s Traffic and Transportation Department, where he oversees a diverse portfolio of multimodal transportation, mobility, and infrastructure projects. With more than 31 years of professional experience, Dilesh provides strategic direction and technical oversight for the planning, design, and delivery of complex transportation systems that enhance safety, accessibility, and quality of life throughout Southern California. His leadership reflects a deep commitment to creating context-sensitive, community-oriented infrastructure that integrates engineering excellence with long-term sustainability.

Over the past three decades, Dilesh has guided multidisciplinary teams of engineers, planners, and designers in delivering transformative Complete Streets, Active Transportation, and Safety Improvement projects for cities, counties, and regional agencies. His experience spans the full spectrum of transportation design, roadways, bridges, roundabouts, drainage systems, traffic signals, utilities, lighting, signing and striping, bikeways, pedestrian corridors, and benefit district programs, ensuring projects are both technically sound and operationally efficient.

Beyond design, Dilesh is recognized for his strategic funding expertise, helping agencies navigate and secure competitive federal and state programs, including the Active Transportation Program (ATP), Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) initiatives. Under his direction, WEBB has successfully obtained over $120 million in ATP funding and $24 million in HSIP and CVAG grants, enabling partner agencies to advance their multimodal and safety priorities from planning through construction. Dilesh’s leadership combines technical precision, funding strategy, and community collaboration, empowering agencies to deliver transportation networks that are safer, more inclusive, and better connected.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE:

Case Road Bridge and Street Improvement Project
City of Perris | Project Manager
Dilesh served as Project Manager for the Case Road Bridge Improvement Project in the City of Perris, involving replacement of the existing structurally deficient two-lane bridge over the San Jacinto River with a new four-lane multimodal bridge crossing designed to improve regional mobility, operational efficiency, hydraulic capacity, structural resiliency, and active transportation connectivity. Responsible for overall project management and multidisciplinary coordination involving roadway and bridge design integration, traffic engineering, utility conflict resolution, hydrology and hydraulic analysis, environmental permitting, agency coordination, and phased construction implementation within a constrained river corridor environment.Led coordination among the City of Perris, structural engineers, environmental teams, utility agencies, Riverside County Flood Control, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) to advance a context-sensitive and environmentally responsive bridge replacement solution. Managed complex technical coordination associated with bridge hydraulics, scour mitigation, freeboard requirements, drainage conveyance, utility relocations, multimodal circulation, and long-term corridor resiliency consistent with regional flood control and transportation objectives.Key project components included staged bridge construction to maintain traffic operations, roadway widening, bridge superstructure and substructure coordination, CIDH pile foundation integration, multimodal corridor improvements, a separated 12-foot-wide Class I bike path/future multipurpose trail, traffic safety enhancements, utility relocations, storm drain improvements, hydraulic and scour analysis, wildlife crossing accommodations, erosion protection measures, and environmental impact minimization strategies within the San Jacinto River corridor. The project also incorporated widened bridge openings, wildlife dry crossing benches, drainage outfall coordination, and reduced permanent disturbance footprints to support regional habitat connectivity and regulatory compliance.Applied extensive experience in transportation infrastructure delivery, interagency coordination, constructability review, and hydraulic corridor design to help successfully advance the project through environmental approvals, permitting, final design coordination, and construction implementation. The project is currently under construction.

PLC North Infrastructure Project
Perris Logistics Center (PLC) | Project Manager
North Off-Site Improvements Project in the City of Perris, a large-scale infrastructure improvement program supporting more than six million square feet of industrial development within the South Perris logistics corridor. Managed multidisciplinary coordination for roadway widening, bridge improvements, I-215/SR-74/Case Road interchange improvements, railroad crossing upgrades, EXPERIENCE:

Industry: 32 Years
WEBB: 26 Years
REGISTRATIONS:

Civil Engineer C 65078 CA
Traffic Engineer TE 2112 CA
EDUCATION:

BS, Civil Engineering
University of Saurastra Rajkot, India
AFFILIATIONS:

American Public Works Association,
Coachella Valley
Institute of Transportation
Engineering Riverside and San
Bernardino Counties
REFERENCES:

Kamran Saber
Senior Project Manager
City of Perris
[email protected]
951.387.9184
Timothy Wassil, PE. PMP, CCM
Public Works Director
City of Indio
[email protected]
760.391.4018
WEBB Resumes

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
22 704
traffic signal improvements, drainage and storm drain infrastructure, utility relocations, environmental permitting, and multimodal transportation facilities. Led coordination with Caltrans, City of Perris, RCTC, SCRRA/Metrolink, Riverside County Flood Control, utility agencies, and environmental resource agencies to advance complex infrastructure improvements through environmental clearance, final design, permitting, reimbursement agreements, and phased implementation. Key project components included Case Road Bridge improvements over the San Jacinto River, interchange improvements processed through Caltrans Streamlined Oversight, railroad warning system modifications, hydrology and hydraulic coordination, traffic control and staging plans, right-ofway engineering, CEQA documentation, biological and jurisdictional permitting, and regional infrastructure funding coordination including TUMF, DIF, and Road and Bridge Benefit District analyses.

I-25 / Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange Improvements
City of Perris / Caltrans District 8 | Lead Coordinator Dilesh served as WEBB’s lead coordinator for the I-215/Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange Improvements Project in the City of Perris in coordination with Caltrans District 8. Led WEBB’s multidisciplinary efforts involving construction staging and traffic handling concepts, Transportation Management Plans (TMPs), utility coordination, drainage and hydraulic analysis, and interagency coordination for a complex freeway interchange improvement project along a critical regional goods movement corridor.

Coordinated closely with Mark Thomas, Caltrans, RCFC&WCD, utility providers, railroad stakeholders, and City staff to support evaluation of Tight Diamond Interchange (TDI), Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), and Single Point Interchange (SPI) alternatives intended to improve interchange operations, freight mobility, and long-term regional circulation. Key project components included interchange widening, overcrossing bridge widening concepts, ramp reconfiguration, multimodal transportation improvements, traffic signal modifications, utility conflict resolution, storm drain coordination, phased construction staging, and traffic operations analysis for Opening Year 2030 and Design Year 2050 conditions. Played a key role in advancing practical and constructible interchange and bridge improvement solutions within a highly constrained and operationally sensitive Caltrans corridor.

Arts and Music Line
Coachella Valley Association of Governments | Principal in Charge Dilesh provides leadership for planning, environmental, and design of 15 miles of enhanced bikeways and pedestrian corridors linking multiple cities in the Coachella Valley. He directed design of 9 miles of Class IV protected facilities and oversaw integration of innovative safety features, including lighting, raised crossings, and bicycle signals. Dilesh also guided ATP grant applications that secured $36 million in funding, positioning the project as a regional model for creative and sustainable mobility infrastructure.

Indian Canyon Two-Way Conversion, Pedestrian, & Bicycle Safety Enhancements City of Palm Springs - Public Works | Principal in Charge Dilesh provided executive oversight and technical guidance for safety and multimodal enhancements along Indian Canyon Drive.

He directed the implementation of pedestrian countdown heads, accessible signals, protected turn phasing, and ADA curb ramp improvements across nine intersections. Under his leadership, the project integrated safety, accessibility, and streetscape improvements to support downtown mobility goals.

Highway Safety Improvement Program Application and Highway Safety Improvement Program Traffic Signal Improvements City of Cathedral City | Project Manager
Dilesh managed design and environmental documentation for the HSIP-funded Traffic Signal Improvement Project, which included 20 signalized intersections citywide. He coordinated preparation of environmental documentation, secured Caltrans approvals, and directed design in accordance with Caltrans and City standards. His leadership facilitated expedited approvals and successful project delivery under federal-aid requirements.

Madison Street Improvements from Avenue 50 to 52
City of Indio | Principal in Charge
As Principal in Charge/Project Manager, Dilesh led the one-mile Madison Street Improvement Project, overseeing the coordination of roadway, drainage, environmental, utility, and right-of-way elements. He oversaw alignment studies, refinements, and feasibility analyses to meet General Plan Circulation Element requirements for Indio and La Quinta. He resolved complex right-of-way and shared-corridor conflicts, including negotiating with Imperial Irrigation District to avoid costly relocation of 92KV transmission lines.

Dilesh delivered a multi-agency-approved, constructible design while maintaining access for community events.

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT | TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

DILESH SHETH, PE, TE

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
23 705

NICHOLAS LOWE, PE, TE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR | TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION
Nick Lowe, MS, PE, TE, is a Deputy Director with WEBB’s Traffic and Transportation Department. Nick assists clients with street improvements, traffic signal upgrades, and signing and striping modifications. He also develops temporary traffic control plans for construction while working closely with public agencies, contractors, and construction managers to safely expedite projects, thus minimizing impacts to traffic and businesses.

Nick and his team also currently work with multiple public agencies as on-call engineers to help agencies keep projects moving forward.

In addition, Nick assists other engineers on street light installations, sewer and water plans, and expert witness testimony. He is also well-versed in the AutoTURN vehicle simulation program which assists in transportation improvements for constrained travel areas such as intersection curb returns and driveways. With increasing traffic pressure amid booming growth throughout Southern California, Nick’s work on regional transportation solutions provides a tangible benefit to the public through improvements in safety, mobility, and quality of life. Nick is active in several industry associations.

Nick also provides grant funding assistance to cities including Carson, Los Angeles, Lake Elsinore, Palm Springs, and Cathedral City and has helped these cities secure nearly $100 million in funding to install bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, advanced dilemma zone detection, flashing beacons, and left turn phasing at over 50 signalized intersections.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE:

Case Road Bridge and Case Road Street Improvement Project City of Perris | Project Engineer
Nick Lowe served as Project Engineer for the Case Road Bridge Improvement Project in the City of Perris, supporting the replacement of the existing two-lane bridge over the San Jacinto River with a new four-lane multimodal bridge crossing. His role included roadway and bridge design coordination, utility conflict review, drainage coordination, traffic safety improvements, and preparation of design elements needed to advance the project through final PS&E and construction. Nick supported the integration of roadway widening, staged construction, multimodal improvements, storm drain improvements, utility relocations, and bridge approach design within a constrained river corridor. He coordinated with the project manager, structural engineers, environmental team, utility providers, and agency reviewers to help resolve design issues related to constructability, traffic operations, drainage conveyance, and environmental constraints. His work contributed to a contextsensitive bridge replacement solution that improved regional mobility, hydraulic capacity, active transportation connectivity, and long-term corridor resiliency while maintaining traffic operations and minimizing impacts within the San Jacinto River corridor.

PLC North Infrastructure Project
Perris Logistics Center (PLC) | Project Engineer
Nick served as Project Engineer for the Perris Logistics Center (PLC) North Off-Site Improvements Project in the City of Perris, a major infrastructure program supporting more than six million square feet of industrial development within the South Perris logistics corridor. He provided technical leadership and design coordination for roadway widening, bridge improvements, interchange modifications, drainage infrastructure, traffic signal improvements, utility relocations, and multimodal transportation facilities.

Nick coordinated the development of design plans, technical studies, utility conflict resolutions, traffic control measures, and drainage improvements while working closely with roadway, structural, environmental, survey, and utility teams. He supported the integration of Case Road Bridge improvements over the San Jacinto River, I-215/SR-74/Case Road interchange improvements, railroad crossing upgrades, and regional storm drain facilities within a complex transportation and flood control environment His responsibilities included coordination with Caltrans, the City of Perris, Riverside County Flood Control, RCTC, SCRRA/ Metrolink, utility providers, and environmental agencies to address design requirements, permitting constraints, constructability considerations, and phased implementation. His contributions helped advance the project through final design, environmental clearance, utility coordination, reimbursement agreement support, and construction implementation.

EXPERIENCE:

Industry: 14 Years
WEBB: 13 Years
REGISTRATIONS:

Civil Engineer C 87666 CA
Traffic Engineer TE 3065 CA
EDUCATION:

MS, Civil Engineering
University of Southern California
BS, Civil Engineering
Stevens Institute of Technology
AFFILIATIONS:

Institute of Transportation
Engineers
American Society of Civil Engineers
Intelligent Transportation Society of
California
REFERENCES:

Donn Uyeno, PE
Principal Civil Engineer
City of Indio
[email protected]
760.391.4028
Yu Tagai, PE
City Engineer
City of Lake Elsinore
[email protected]
951.674.3124

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
24 706
Avenue 50 Widening and Avenue 52 Street Improvements
City of Indio | Project Manager
Nick manages the design of roadway widening and bicycle trail improvements for Avenue 50 and Avenue 52 in the Cities of Indio and La Quinta. He oversees coordination among multiple agencies and utility companies to facilitate undergrounding, drainage, and multi-use path construction along this two-mile corridor adjacent to the Coachella Festival fairgrounds. The project will enhance event traffic flow, regional mobility, and multimodal connectivity for future travel demand. The project includes roadway widening, to ultimate, Class I bike paths, Class II bike lanes, Class IV bike lanes, driveway modifications, sidewalks, curb ramps, specialized underground drainage basins, traffic signal modifications, utility relocations, and right of way acquisitions. The lack of an existing mainline drainage system necessitated the underground percolation facilities to capture and gradually percolate street flows. This effort included geotechnical analysis and hydrology analysis for drainage area calculations and storage capacity. Most of the improvements have to be built within a constrained right of way bounded by high-value properties. WEBB worked closely with the City and utility agencies to tighten up the street cross section and utility locations to minimize impacts to property owners.

Madison Street Improvements from Avenue 50 to 52
City of Indio | Project Engineer
Nick served as Project Engineer for the Madison Street Improvements project, preparing traffic signal and signing and striping plans to support corridor widening and intersection upgrades. His work included alignment studies, design documentation, and coordination with multiple agencies to deliver a comprehensive set of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E). The project enhanced safety, capacity, and multimodal access along a key arterial connecting the Cities of Indio and La Quinta.

Arts and Music Line
Coachella Valley Association of Governments | Project Engineer Nick served as Project Engineer for the CVAG Arts and Music Line, a transformative 15-mile bikeway corridor connecting multiple cities and regional destinations. His contributions included development of protected bicycle facilities, raised crossings, and bicycle signal design to improve user safety and comfort. He also supported grant coordination and innovative design features integrating lighting, sound, and accessibility enhancements. The project successfully secured $36 million in ATP funding, advancing regional multimodal connectivity.

Landau Boulevard at McCallum Way Traffic Signal Intersection Improvements City of Cathedral City | Project Manager
Nick managed the design of intersection improvements and a new traffic signal at Landau Boulevard and McCallum Way, enhancing safety near a local school. His leadership included oversight of geometric design, pavement reconstruction, ADA-compliant curb ramps, lighting simulations, and signing and striping plans. Nick's comprehensive approach ensured that the project addressed both operational efficiency and pedestrian safety in this high-traffic area.

On-Call Traffic Engineering Services
City of Lake Elsinore | Technical Advisor
Nick serves as Technical Advisor for the City's On-Call Traffic Engineering Services contract, leading efforts to address transportation challenges and enhance roadway safety and mobility since 2015. He manages a variety of projects, including traffic signal upgrades, corridor improvements, and signing and striping plans that advance the City's active transportation goals.

Notable efforts include securing $825,300 in HSIP Cycle 8 grant funding for safety enhancements at eight intersections, designing median and striping improvements on Summerhill Drive, and conducting traffic control plan reviews and development application evaluations to support City operations.

Palm Canyon Pedestrian Safety Improvements
City of Palm Springs - Public Works | Project Engineer
Nick led the design for this complex downtown mobility project, which included over 20 signal modifications, pedestrian and bicycle enhancements, and conversion of one-way streets to two-way operation. His work focused on signal coordination, ADA ramp design for constrained conditions, and implementation of the City's first scramble crosswalk. Through extensive collaboration with City staff and stakeholders, Nick helped deliver a safer and more accessible transportation network in the heart of Palm Springs.

Washington Street Connector to Arts and Music Line
City of La Quinta | Civil Plans Lead Engineer
Nick leads the civil design for this multi-use trail project along Washington Street from Eisenhower Drive to Avenue 48, integrating pedestrian, bicycle, and streetscape improvements. The work includes a 14-foot-wide concrete trail, retaining walls, trail-level lighting, and signal modifications with dedicated bicycle phasing. Nick coordinates closely with City staff and local HOAs to balance design aesthetics, safety, and long-term maintenance needs while enhancing connectivity to CVAG's Art and Music Line.

NICHOLAS LOWE, PE, TE
DEPUTY DIRECTOR | TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
25 707

SCOTT HILDEBRANDT, PE
CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER | ADMINISTRATION
Scott Hildebrandt, PE, is the Chief Strategy Officer at WEBB, and his credentials and extensive experience in the engineering industry are truly remarkable. His tenure at WEBB, spanning over three and a half decades, underscores his profound impact on the engineering industry. His substantial contributions during the industrial boom in the region, combined with his expertise in infrastructure, public works, and the industrial/logistics sector, have undoubtedly made him a highly sought-after expert for major projects.

Scott’s deep regional knowledge and ability to navigate complex projects make him an invaluable asset. His leadership and strategic vision have played a pivotal role in shaping the success of significant undertakings. His ability to oversee multi-faceted projects speaks volumes about his proficiency, versatility, and depth of knowledge. Scott has been instrumental in the planning, development, and build-out of the north Perris region. In the mid-2000s, logistic development was actively pursuing a move into the region due to the large undeveloped parcels of land near Interstate 215.

As a result, the City of Perris elected to proactively plan for the influx of industrial/logistics into the area. This led to the adoption and implementation of the Perris Valley Commerce Center Specific Plan (PVCCSP) on over 3000 acres in north Perris, the adoption of North Perris Road & Bridge Benefit District (NPRBBD) to cover roadway improvements needed to serve the PVCCSP, as well as the adoption of the North Perris Master Drainage Plan (NPMDP) which opened the ability to develop in a region with minimal storm drain infrastructure and heavily impact by flooding.

Scott’s role as the lead on infrastructure planning and his collaboration with the City of Perris City Manager and City Engineer were pivotal to the success of these initiatives. Today, with about 75% of the PVCCSP developed and most of the infrastructure in place, the City of Perris stands out as one of California’s most financially viable cities.

Over the years, he has successfully planned and designed various projects, including transportation systems, sewer and water systems, storm drains, and utility tunnels. Scott’s ability to cultivate strong relationships with local, state, and federal regulatory agencies highlights his valuable insight and deep industry knowledge. His proficiency in navigating complex regulatory landscapes is a testament to his expertise in project management.

Scott’s strategic vision has had a lasting impact on the region and has made him an invaluable asset to our team and the industry.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
• Case Road Bridge and Street Improvement Project, City of Perris • PLC North Infrastructure Project, Perris Logistics Center (PLC) • North Indio Channel Phase 1 and 2, Coachella Valley Water District • Perris Valley Channel Lateral B, Stage 4, Riverside Flood Control & Water Conservation District
• Heacock Channel March Joint Powers Authority, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
• San Jacinto River Stage 3 Master Plan, Riverside Flood Control & Water Conservation District • Hemet MDP Line C, Stage 4, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Eastern Coachella Valley Stormwater Master Plan and EIR, Coachella Valley Water District • Marshall Creek, Stage 1, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District • Perris Valley Channel Lateral B, Stage 5, Hillwood Investment Properties • Perris Valley Commerce Center Specific Plan, City of Perris • March Lifecare Development, March Healthcare Development and CEO Strategic Solutions • Homeland/Romoland Master Drainage Plan and EIR, Riverside County Flood Control District and Water Conservation District
EXPERIENCE:

Industry: 39 Years
WEBB: 39 Years
REGISTRATIONS:

Civil Engineer C 44762 CA
EDUCATION:

MS, Civil Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
BS, Civil Engineering
California Polytechnic University,
Pomona
AFFILIATIONS:

American Society of Civil Engineers
National Society of Professional
Engineers
National Council of Examiners for
Engineers and Surveyors
National Association of Industrial
and Office Parks
REFERENCES:

Jason Uhley
Chief Engineer
Riverside County Flood Control &
Water Conservation District
[email protected]
951.955.1296
John Pourkazemi
City Engineer
City of Perris
[email protected]
951.943.6100 Ext. 116

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
26 708

STEPHANIE STANDERFER
VICE PRESIDENT | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Stephanie Standerfer is the Vice President and Director of WEBB’s Environmental Services Department. She has over 25 years of experience as an environmental professional, specializing in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance for public and private clients. Her expertise reflects the dynamic and interdisciplinary nature of CEQA, and she serves as the Principal in Charge of the department, overseeing workload management, project progress, and staff development.

Stephanie has worked primarily in Inland Southern California, representing a wide range of clients including transportation agencies, healthcare providers, resource conservation districts, community college districts, local agency formation commissions, infrastructure districts, cities, counties, and private developers. Her diverse project experience enables her to anticipate and navigate challenges that arise during CEQA compliance. She regularly leads coordination among large teams of environmental planners, engineers, and agency staff, and actively guides clients through the complexities of environmental compliance.

In addition to her CEQA background, Stephanie has extensive habitat conservation experience and provides Expert Witness work in this field. For eight years, she served as contract staff to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA), the agency responsible for implementing the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). In this role, she provided review, consultation, and training on MSHCP implementation procedures and policies. She developed guidance documents for the RCA and its 17 participating cities and worked closely with regulatory agencies to resolve compliance issues.

Her conservation biology and regulatory compliance leadership experience has fostered strong, collaborative relationships with regulatory bodies, allowing her to identify and address potential project issues proactively. She also led the preparation of conservation planning studies for the County of San Bernardino, including management of the San Bernardino County Regional Conservation Investment Strategy (RCIS), one of the few RCISs approved by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Clients benefit from Stephanie’s interdisciplinary background in environmental planning.

Known as a CEQA authority, she frequently receives requests to provide peer reviews of environmental documents. Clients also seek Stephanie’s strategic guidance on CEQA, regulatory compliance, and MSHCP expertise. She is a regular speaker at conferences and seminars across the state, sharing insights on environmental compliance. Stephanie values close collaboration with clients and colleagues and takes pride in building long-standing professional relationships.

EXPERIENCE:

Industry: 28 Years
WEBB: 19 Years
EDUCATION:

MS, Environmental Sciences
Washington State University,
Pullman
BS, Environmental Sciences
University of California, Riverside
AFFILIATIONS:

American Planning Association
Association of Environmental
Professionals, President, Inland
Empire Chapter
Chair of the Board, Greater
Riverside Chamber of Commerce
City of Riverside Cultural Heritage
Board, Chair (2003–2011)
REFERENCES:

Nate Smith, PE
Deputy Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
City of Banning
[email protected]
951.922.3182
Stuart E. McKibbin, PE
Contract City Engineer
City of San Jacinto
[email protected]
951.654.3592

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
27 709

JOSEPH CALDWELL, PE, CPESC, CPSWQ, QSD, QSP,
CFM
PRACTICE AREA LEADER | WATER RESOURCES
Joseph Caldwell, PE, CPESC, CPSWQ, QSD, QSP, CFM, is the Practice Area Leader with WEBB’s Water Resources Department. He leads staff development and oversees the department’s quality assurance/quality control program, ensuring all projects meet technical standards from concept through final design.

Joseph specializes in master drainage planning, backbone drainage infrastructure, and water quality systems for regional flood control projects. A Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control and Storm Water Quality, he brings expertise in hydrology, hydraulics, and environmental compliance.

His experience includes designing regional flood control basins, levees, and miles of backbone drainage infrastructure, as well as hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the San Jacinto River from Railroad Canyon to the existing Army Corps levee in the City of San Jacinto. Joseph’s extensive knowledge of local agency design standards and strong professional relationships enable efficient project delivery and approval.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE:

Case Road Bridge and Case Street Improvements Project
City of Perris | Drainage Engineer
Joseph Caldwell served as the Drainage Engineer for the Case Road Bridge and Case Street Improvements Project, leading the hydraulic analysis and drainage evaluation efforts supporting bridge and roadway improvements. He prepared pre- and post-project hydraulic modeling, performed scour calculations, and evaluated project impacts to ensure compliance with applicable design criteria and floodplain requirements. Joseph authored the drainage and hydraulic technical report, summarizing modeling results and providing engineering recommendations that informed final design decisions and supported project approvals. His technical expertise helped deliver a resilient drainage solution that enhanced flood conveyance and long-term infrastructure performance.

Avenue 50 Bridge Project
City of Indio | Drainage Engineer
For the Avenue 50 Improvements Project for the City of Indio, Joseph Caldwell served as the Drainage Engineer, providing hydraulic and scour analysis to support the design and implementation of critical roadway and drainage improvements. He performed pre- and post-project hydraulic modeling, prepared scour calculations, and evaluated drainage system performance to verify compliance with applicable engineering standards.

Joseph authored the technical report summarizing modeling results and engineering recommendations, helping guide design decisions and support project approvals. His expertise in hydraulic analysis contributed to a reliable drainage solution that improved flood conveyance and long-term infrastructure resilience.

Avenue 44 Project
City of Indio | Drainage Engineer
For the Avenue 44 Project for the City of Indio, Joseph Caldwell served as the Drainage Engineer, providing hydraulic and scour analysis to support roadway and drainage improvements. He prepared pre- and post-project hydraulic analyses, performed scour calculations, and evaluated drainage conditions to inform design recommendations.

Joseph authored the technical report summarizing modeling results and engineering recommendations, helping support project decision-making and long-term drainage performance.

Heacock Channel March Joint Powers Authority
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District | Project Manager Joseph managed Phase 3 of the Heacock Channel Design Project, leading the preparation of final improvement plans, traffic control plans, and hydrology/hydraulic analyses for approximately 3,600 LF of channel. He coordinated all project activities, including design team meetings, quality control, and permitting, ensuring regulatory compliance and approval readiness. His leadership facilitated efficient project delivery and alignment with regional flood control objectives.

EXPERIENCE:

Industry: 24 Years
WEBB: 24 Years
REGISTRATIONS:

Civil Engineer C 67239 CA
Civil Engineer 030017 NV
Civil Engineer C 76114 AZ
Civil Engineer 14217483 UT
Civil Engineer 0066347 CO
CERTIFICATIONS:

Certified Professional in Erosion
and Sediment Control CPESC 5311
Certified Professional in
Stormwater Quality CPSWQ 544
Qualified SWPPP Developer QSD
00076
Qualified SWPPP Practitioner QSP
00076
Certified Floodplain Manager CFM
EDUCATION:

BS, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University
MS, Civil Engineering
Brigham Young University
AFFILIATIONS:

American Society of Civil Engineers
American Public Works Association
Floodplain Management
Association
REFERENCES:

Edwin Quinonez
Assistant Chief Engineer
Riverside County Flood Control &
Water Conservation District
[email protected]
951.955.1452
Jileen Ferris
Deputy Public Works Director
City of Hemet
[email protected]
951.765.3847

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
28 710
Jason Ardery is a licensed Civil Engineer, Traffic Engineer, and Land Surveyor with over 20 years of experience delivering public and private infrastructure projects across Southern California. As Deputy Director of Land Survey and Mapping at WEBB, Jason brings a unique blend of technical precision and leadership, with a strong emphasis on land surveying and its critical role in planning, entitlement, and construction.

Throughout his career, Jason has led multidisciplinary teams of engineers, surveyors, and planners in successfully executing municipal infrastructure, residential subdivisions, commercial centers, and industrial developments. His deep understanding of boundary and topographic surveys, ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, construction staking, and legal mapping has been instrumental in ensuring project accuracy, regulatory compliance, and timely delivery.

Jason’s surveying expertise is complemented by his leadership in entitlement processes, including General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans, Tentative Maps, and Williamson Act cancellations. He played a pivotal role on the City of Eastvale’s General Plan Advisory Committee, helping shape the city’s first General Plan—a testament to his commitment to public service and community development.

In addition to his technical credentials, Jason holds CPESC, QSD, and QSP certifications and is a certified sUAS Remote Pilot, enabling him to integrate drone-based surveying into modern workflows. He is a graduate of Cal Poly Pomona with a BS in Civil Engineering and remains active in professional organizations such as ASCE and CLSA. Jason also serves as President of his homeowners’ association, further demonstrating his dedication to civic engagement.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE:

Arts and Music Line
Coachella Valley Association of Governments | Technical Advisor Jason served as Technical Advisor, providing quality review of utility information incorporated into design drawings and advising on right-of-way and easement requirements. He led the research and evaluation of existing land rights, coordinated the preparation and review of legal descriptions and plats, and worked closely with Land Survey and Mapping and design team staff to align survey data with project needs. His coordination supported accurate right-of-way acquisition, reduced risk during final design, and ensured legally defensible mapping for project delivery.

Speedway Commerce Center II
Hillwood Investment Properties | Technical Advisor
As Technical Advisor for the Speedway Commerce Center II redevelopment, Jason Ardery provided strategic guidance and technical oversight for transforming the 2-mile California Speedway racetrack into a master planned industrial campus comprising seven warehouse facilities and a NASCAR short track. Leveraging his extensive entitlement and development experience, Jason led the preparation and coordination of key planning documents, including the tentative parcel map, conceptual grading, utilities, and infrastructure designs supporting the project's Specific Plan and CEQA requirements. Prior to Hillwood's acquisition of the 522-acre property, Jason managed the preparation and updates of the ALTA survey and aerial topography, ensuring accurate base data for due diligence and design. He also directed the lot line adjustment process, a critical step enabling Hillwood to phase acquisition from NASCAR.Jason oversaw the completion and recordation of a 26 parcel Final Parcel Map and subsequently coordinated the development, review, and execution of numerous supporting legal instruments, including easement documents, quitclaims, and plat exhibits. His leadership ensured technical completeness, regulatory compliance, and seamless progression from entitlement through acquisition and mapping.

Caltrans 42B4956 vs Aim High
California Department of Transportation | Technical Expert As Technical Expert, Jason provided specialized support for this Caltrans-led project focused on the construction of a new bypass connection between State Highways 138 and 18. Jason comprehensively reviewed development potential and property impacts in pre- and post-construction conditions. His analysis addressed key factors including property boundaries and areas, land use and zoning regulations, setbacks, access modifications, grading constraints, drainage patterns, floodplain considerations, and existing utility infrastructure. His technical insight ensured informed decision-making and minimized adverse impacts to surrounding properties.

JASON ARDERY, PE, TE, LLS, CPESC, QSD, QSP
DEPUTY DIRECTOR | LAND SURVEY AND MAPPING
EXPERIENCE:

Industry: 24 Years
WEBB: 22 Years
REGISTRATIONS:

Civil Engineer C 71508 CA
Traffic Engineer 2618 CA
Licensed Land Surveyor 9329 CA
CERTIFICATIONS:

Certified Professional in Erosion
and Sediment Control 6561
Qualified SWPPP Developer/
Practitioner 20935
FAA Part 107 Certified Drone
Operator
EDUCATION:

BS, Civil Engineering
California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
AFFILIATIONS:

American Society of Civil Engineers
California Land Surveyors
Association

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
29 711

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
30 LYNN ODGIIV, PE, SE
Structures Lead

EDUCATION
MS in Structural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, 2010 BS in Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 2008

REGISTRATION
CA PE 86869
CA SE 6838
Lynn has over 19 years of experience in bridge structural engineering for transportation structures as a project manager and structures technical lead with an emphasis in analysis, design, and inspection of highway bridges, earth retaining and other transportation structures. Her experience includes structures lead and engineer of record (EOR) of an Express Lanes Design Build (DB) project with multiple bridges, structures lead and EOR of a signature pedestrian overcrossing and more. She has been working closely with local and state agencies, while being responsible charge of leading, managing and successfully delivering bridge-specific projects of various sizes, from large full segment project with multiple structures with Caltrans and OCTA as the structures lead to small rehabilitation work with local agencies. She managed and delivered numerous bridge Plan, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&Es) and various design phase bridge reports.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Nuevo Road Bridge Replacement, Riverside County
Structures lead for the replacement of the existing Nuevo Road Bridge over San Jacinto River. The existing two-lane bridge will be replaced with a four-lane structure accommodating the future build out of Nuevo Road.

The approach roadway will taper from the new wider structure to the existing two-lane roadway. Primarily funded by HBP funds, the project will follow the process and procedures under the Caltrans Office of Local Programs.

Cannon Street Bridge Widening over Santiago Creek,
Orange
Structures lead providing professional and technical
engineering services to improve the level of service along Cannon Street by widening to provide an additional northbound lane between Santiago Canyon Road and
Serrano Avenue. The City is leading the civil and roadway design efforts, in addition to preparing the WQMP and coordination with the utility companies and the City of Villa Park, while Mark Thomas is leading the environmental clearance, bridge
widening, traffic engineering and landscape architecture efforts while providing overall support services for survey,
geotechnical, hydrology & hydraulic analysis and ROW
engineering.

La Novia Bridge over San Juan Creek Replacement
Feasibility Study and PAED, San Juan Capistrano
Structures lead for the preliminary study, performing the structural analysis, preparing the preliminary cost estimate for each phase from planning to construction
and identification of funding sources for the replacement of this bridge. The project includes improvements to the existing La Novia Avenue bridge that spans San Juan
Creek. The existing two-lane bridge will be demolished in phases and replaced with a new four-lane, three-span bridge.

In addition, to the four travel lanes, the bridge will
also include a pedestrian lane and an equestrian lane that will be physically separated from the travel lanes. The project was approved and our team is proceeding with the PA&ED phase.

Hammond Road Bridge Widening, Riverside Structures
lead for this project where Mark Thomas prepared preliminary engineering and environmental documentation for Hammond Road improvements in Riverside County, evaluating roadway, intersection, drainage, and multimodal upgrades. The team integrated CEQA compliance with conceptual design and
technical studies, addressing constraints, right-of-way, and utilities. Coordination with RCTD advanced a preferred
alternative with cost and phasing support, improving safety, connectivity, and corridor mobility.

Bonita School Road Bridge Over Santa Maria River
Replacement, Santa Barbara
Structures lead responsible for managing the project bridge design, including construction plan production, overseeing bridge design calculations, preparing construction
specifications, and cost estimate to replace the Bonita School Road Bridge over the Santa Maria River. Project tasks include designing the replacement bridge, associated civil work, levee design, and the design of a bikeway undercrossing near the south levee of the channel. This project requires coordination and permitting through the USACE and the Santa Barbara
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

REFERENCES
Vu Tran, PE, PLS
Principal Civil Engineer
City of Irvine, Public Works and Sustainability
P.O. Box 19575, Irvine, CA 92623-9575
949.724.6358
[email protected]
Prem Rimal, PE, SE
Structure Liaison Engineer
Caltrans District 12, Office of Special Funded Projects and Structures Local Assistance
P.O. Box 168041, Sacramento, CA 95816-8041
949.279.8474
[email protected]
712
Subconsultant Qualification Summary Table
Subconsultant Education Experience Professional Credentials Kevin Israel,
Senior Biologist
ECORP
Consulting, Inc.

B.A., Environmental Studies, University
of California, Santa Cruz
Daley Ranch Vegetation Mapping, San Diego County,
City of Escondido (2024-Ongoing)
Flacon Constraints Analysis Project, Los Angeles County, Sully Miller Contracting Co. (2025)
Earl Graham Container Storage Project, San Bernardino
County, Entitlement Strategies Group, Inc. (2024-2025)
Granite Lion Cellars Driveway Project, San Diego County, Michael Baker International (2025) CDFW Scientific Collecting Permit
(S-190530002-21073-001, exp.
2/23/2025 – renewal processing)
Marine Protected Species Observer
(MPSC 201820068, no exp.)
OSHA Hazardous Waste
Operations and Emergency Response
(1703121191176, exp. 8/26/2026)
Sarah Rieboldt,
Principal
Paleontologist/
Principal
Investigator
Applied
Earthworks, Inc.

Postdoctoral Research Associate,
Center for Integrative Planetary Science,
2005–2006, University of California,
Berkeley
Ph.D., Paleontology, 2005, University of
California, Berkeley
B.A., Biology, minor: Geology, 1999,
University of Colorado, Boulder
Supported Hundreds of Western U.S. Projects
Led Paleontological Compliance Programs
Managed Fossil Recovery & Mitigation
Coordinated Multi-Agency Reviews
Extensive Caltrans Project Experience
Certified Principal Investigator for
Paleontology, Orange County
(2013–present)
Paleontology Consultant, Riverside
County (2013–present)
Certified Paleontologist, San Diego
County (2013–present)
Principal Investigator, BLM California
Statewide Paleontological Permit
CA-24-03P
Alahesh
Thurairajah, PE,
GE, BC.GE,
Geotechnical
Lead
Earth Mechanics,
Inc.

M.S., Civil Engineering, University of
California, Los Angeles
BS, Civil Engineering, California State
Polytechnic University, Pomona
City of Perris, I-215/Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange Improvements, Riverside County and Perris, CA
RCTD, Replacement/Widen of Nuevo Road Bridge over
San Jacinto River, Riverside County, CA.

RCTD, Replacement of Gilman Springs Road Bridge
over Potrero Creek, Riverside County, CA
California Geotechnical Engineer, GE
3123
California Civil Engineer, PE 81439
Board-Certified Geotechnical
Engineer, ASCE
Zawwar Saiyed,
MS., PE, RSP,
Principal
Linscott, Law
& Greenspan,
Engineers
M.S. in Civil Engineering, University of
Arizona
County of Orange, OCTA Transportation Demand
Management Toolbox Development
City of Huntington Beach, City of Huntington Beach SB
743 Implementation and VMT Guidelines
City of Corning, Paskenta SS4A Comprehensive Safety
Action Plan (CSAP) Development
City of Thousand Oaks, Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Update Development
City of South Lake Tahoe, Caltrans Sustainable
Transportation Grants Application Support
City of Laguna Niguel, General Plan Update LOS and
VMT Traffic Studies
Professional Engineer, CA
Registration TR 2525
TPCB Road Safety Professional, RSP
1,256
Arthur Robison,
PE, Branch
Manager
T2 Utility
Engineers
B.S. Civil Engineering, California State
University at Long Beach, 2006
Port of Long Beach, Pier D Street Realignment, Long
Beach, CA
Orange County Sanitation, Project No. 2-49, Orange, CA
Orange County Sanitation, Project No. 5-67, Newport
Beach, CA
Metropolitan Water District, Iron Mountain Pumping
Plant, Sablon, CA
Large Potable Water Valve Replacement Project
Redondo Ave and Kilroy Way, Long Beach, CA
Professional Engineer (PE)
CA 78222, Exp 9/30/27
Kenny Perez
Senior, President
Visual Concepts
Lighting
Mesa College-1978, National Electrical
Code
On-going classes in lighting fundamental, applications, Title-24 and UBC, NEC, CEC etcetera
40 years of field experience as an electrician installing lighting and power systems
29 years engineering design experience in the
consulting electrical engineering field
UCSD-1998, HVAC, DDC Controls
Certification
Robert Gregory,
Founder and Chief
Executive Officer,
RGI Utility
Consultants
B.S. Civil Engineering, University of
Missouri - Rolla
Dry Utility Planning & Design
Utility Relocation Coordination
Roadway Interchange Infrastructure
Grade Separation Projects
SCE & DWP Transmission Facilities
Dry Utility Rights-of-Way Expertise
Power, Gas, Telecom & CATV Systems
Multi-Agency Utility Coordination
Life Member of the American Society
of Civil Engineers

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
31 713
Corporate Qualifications of the Firm and the Team

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
32 Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB) has been a trusted provider of civil engineering services to public sector clients across California since 1945.

Our longevity reflects a foundation of financial stability and adaptability through decades of evolving economic landscapes. As a mid-sized consulting firm with offices in Riverside and Murrieta, WEBB is strategically positioned to serve the diverse needs of our clients effectively.

We offer comprehensive in-house professional services, bringing decades of experience to public and private sector clients throughout Inland Southern California. Our team specializes in addressing the unique challenges faced by cities, water and special districts, counties, regional agencies, and industry partners. From project development and planning to design, entitlement, funding assistance, permitting, construction management, and inspection, our services span the entire project lifecycle.

WEBB’s enduring legacy, financial strength, and dedicated team of experts make us the preferred partner for public sector entities in California. We are committed to delivering excellence, ensuring the success of every project, and fostering lasting professional partnerships.

WEBB’s Financial Condition
Albert A. Webb Associates (WEBB) is a financially secure California corporation that demonstrates long-term stability and a strong foundation for growth. Our sound financial management practices ensure we have the resources to execute projects of all sizes and complexities confidently.

We maintain healthy liquidity reserves, providing security and the ability to navigate unforeseen challenges without disrupting project timelines or deliverables.

As a privately held company, WEBB is not owned or controlled by any other organization and has no financial interest in other entities. We typically do not provide detailed financial statements. Still, we are willing to offer relevant information upon request to assure our clients of our financial strength and capability to complete the required services successfully.

Conflict of Interest Statement
WEBB discloses that it has no financial, business, or other relationships with the City of Perris that could affect the outcome of this contract or any subsequent construction project. Additionally, WEBB confirms that none of its current clients have any financial interest in the outcome of this contract or any related construction project.

WEBB also affirms that it has no financial interests, ownership stakes, partnerships, or business relationships with any construction companies that may submit bids for the project resulting from the services outlined in this RFP. No officer, principal, employee, or subconsultant of WEBB holds any interests that could conflict with the faithful performance of the services described in this RFP.

WEBB guarantees that it has not paid and will not pay any third party, any money or other considerations to obtain this Agreement. Furthermore, WEBB is in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws regarding conflicts of interest, including the City of Perris’s Conflict of Interest Code on file with the City Clerk’s office.

Corporate Headquarters
160+ 40+
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
951.686.1070
Associates Licensed
Professionals
Engineering and Planning
Excellence Since 1945
WEBB offers the following services:

Learn more by visiting
webbassociates.com/services
Construction Management
and Inspection
Environmental Services
Land Development Engineering
Land Development Planning
and Entitlement
Land Survey and Mapping
Landscape Architecture
Traffic and Transportation
Engineering
Water Resources and
Stormwater Engineering
714

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
33 Firm Experience and Public Agency Qualifications
WEBB brings over 80 years of continuous civil engineering service to public sector clients across California, delivering projects that span the full lifecycle from environmental clearance and preliminary engineering through PS&E, bidding, and construction support.

This depth of experience maps directly to the two-phase scope the City of Perris requires for the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project.

Proven Performance on Similar Public Works Projects
WEBB is a trusted partner to cities, counties, water districts, and regional agencies throughout Inland Southern California. Our services span project development and planning, design, entitlement, funding assistance, permitting, construction management, and inspection, precisely the disciplines required for this bridge replacement project.

Our team has extensive experience delivering public-sector projects that adhere to strict timelines, budget constraints, and compliance standards, including PS&E packages, prevailing wage work, and multi-agency coordination. This makes WEBB a dependable partner for complex, multi-phase capital projects like the Goetz Road Bridge Replacement.

Familiarity with Riverside County Standards and RCFC&WCD The Goetz Road Bridge Replacement requires a storm drain design that complies with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) standards. Over the past three decades, WEBB has worked closely with RCFC&WCD to design and deliver scores of flood control projects for both public and private clients. Our team is intimately familiar with RCFC&WCD staff and design procedures, a direct advantage in gaining streamlined approval for this project.

Experience with Public Agencies of a Similar Nature
WEBB currently provides on-call and project-specific services to a broad roster of public agencies directly comparable to the City of Perris, including the County of Riverside, City of Moreno Valley, City of Banning, City of Beaumont, City of Wildomar, City of Palm Springs, City of Riverside, City of Chino, City of Grand Terrace, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and numerous water districts throughout the region.

Our long-standing experience working with public agencies has educated our staff on what it means to work within a jurisdiction, understanding the internal pressures, decision-making processes, and regulatory environments that City Staff must navigate daily.

Key Personnel with Directly Relevant Experience
Our proposed team brings senior-level professionals with hands-on experience in public infrastructure projects of similar scope and complexity. All principal and senior-level staff have worked on public infrastructure engineering projects for both private and publicsector clients, making them diverse in skill set and uniquely capable of understanding both perspectives.

WEBB’s team includes multiple professionals who have worked directly within public agencies as engineers and designers, giving them firsthand knowledge of agency processes, procurement requirements, and the nature of public sector decision-making. This insider perspective translates to smoother coordination with City Staff, fewer surprises during permitting, and more efficient project delivery.

Environmental Services Depth
Phase 1 of this project demands rigorous CEQA/NEPA compliance, environmental permitting, and coordination with multiple regulatory agencies. WEBB’s Environmental Services Department has over 50 years of continuous experience providing CEQA and NEPA compliance services as a primary business function, with expertise spanning planning, design, environmental documentation, engineering coordination, and construction phase support for public agency projects. 715

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
34 Subconsultants
Mark Thomas Engineering Structural Engineering
5000 East Spring Street, Suite 400, Long Beach, CA 90815 Mark Thomas provides civil and structures engineering, surveying, landscape architecture, planning & urban design, construction management, and grant writing services to clients throughout California. The Mark Thomas team has extensive experience delivering new bridges, and bridge replacements and rehabilitations, ranging from rural creek crossings and pedestrian bridges to arterial grade separations and freeway overcrossings. We are experienced in the design of cast-in-place concrete, precast concrete, and steel structures. Our team brings an unmatched understanding of new bridge design and bridge replacements and widenings over roads, railroads, and waterways; bridge feasibility studies; preparation of Bridge Type Selection Reports; and the HBP project delivery process. We are knowledgeable on the current bridge design codes including AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC) 2.0; and Caltrans bridge manuals. We are also intimately familiar with the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) & Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG); CEQA and NEPA documentation requirements; and state and federal funding requirements.

Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Geotechnical Analysis
765 North Main Street, Suite 136, Corona, CA 92878
Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI) is a California-based geotechnical and earthquake engineering consulting firm specializing in transportation infrastructure, including bridges, highways, roadways, rail/transit, ports/harbors, and tunnels. EMI brings extensive experience in geotechnical site investigations, seismic hazard evaluations, earthquake retrofit studies, and foundation design, with a strong record supporting bridge and roadway projects throughout California. For the Goetz Road Bridge project, EMI’s expertise will support sound subsurface evaluation and geotechnical recommendations that help reduce design risk, address seismic considerations, and support constructable, resilient infrastructure solutions.

ECORP, Inc. Biological Studies
215 North 5th Street, Redlands, CA 92374
ECORP, Inc. will provide specialized biological consulting services to support the project, including biological resource assessments, habitat evaluations, and regulatory permitting assistance. With extensive experience throughout Southern California, ECORP brings a strong understanding of sensitive species, jurisdictional resources, and compliance with state and federal environmental regulations. Their team has successfully supported infrastructure and transportation projects requiring coordination with agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Regional Water Quality Control Boards. ECORP’s expertise will help streamline environmental review efforts, minimize potential project impacts, and support timely project delivery.

Applied Earthworks
Cultural Studies
133 N San Gabriel Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91107
AE specializes in history, archaeology, paleontology, and cultural resources management.

Current laws and regulations mandate consideration of prehistoric and historical remains.

They use a variety of procedures to manage these resources without impeding progress.

Through effective communication, technical expertise, economical and efficient project management, and creative solutions, AE makes it possible to build for the future without sacrificing our cultural heritage. WEBB and AE are currently working through AB52 compliance issues for other jurisdictions. WEBB has partnered on multiple projects with AE over the past five years.
716

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
35 Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers VMT Analysis
2 Executive Circle, Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92614
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) will provide Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for the project, bringing specialized expertise in transportation planning, traffic engineering, and CEQA transportation assessment. Since 1996, LLG has provided transportation planning, traffic engineering, and parking consultation services throughout the United States and internationally, with offices in Irvine, Pasadena, and San Diego. Their team has prepared VMT screening analyses, technical memoranda, and CEQA transportation assessments for public and private projects across California, including recent work in Riverside County. For this project, LLG will support the team by evaluating VMT impacts, documenting methodology and findings, and helping the City navigate SB 743/CEQA transportation requirements with defensible, agency-ready analysis.

Visual Concepts Lighting
Lighting Design and Electrical Engineering
4858 Mercury Street 210, San Diego, CA 92111
Visual Concepts Lighting, Inc., stands as a leading full-service electrical engineering firm, dedicated to the intricate art of sustainable lighting design. While our capabilities span the entire spectrum of electrical engineering, we have honed our focus and expertise on outdoor lighting, epitomizing a ‘Fusion of Light’ that transforms spaces – from high-end residential landscapes to picturesque streetscapes and dynamic municipal ball fields.Visual Concepts Lighting design philosophy is rooted in a seamless journey, guiding clients from lighting concept to construction-ready plans. With a robust foundation of over 30 years of hands-on electrical field experience and a cumulative 45 years of design prowess, we are committed to delivering designs that align with the true intent of our clients. Our approach aims to eliminate costly change orders, ensuring the successful realization of efficient and effective electrical systems.

T2 Utility Engineers
Utility Engineering and Surveying Services
5622 Research Dr, Huntington Beach, CA 92649
T2 UES, Inc. dba T2 Utility Engineers (T2ue) provides a full range of Utility Engineering services, including Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE), advanced geophysics, test holes/ potholing, surveying, and utility coordination to support infrastructure projects in the United States (US) and Canada. Recognized as a leader in managing the risks associated with above-ground and sub-surface utilities, T2ue staff have the experience and expertise with managing projects of all sizes, from small development jobs to large-scale billion dollar infrastructure projects for public and private clients. T2ue has 30+ offices and about 300 employees across the US and Canada and can quickly mobilize resources for your project.

We retain a vast array of geophysical and designating equipment and one of the largest fleets of SUE vehicles within the West. T2ue’s SUE crews and field technicians are available to respond quickly to your project needs.

RGI Utility Consultants
Utility Source and Design
200 S Main St 316, Corona, CA 92882
RGI Utility Consultants (RGI) will provide dry utility services for the City’s Project. WEBB has teamed with RGI on a few recent Traffic Engineering projects throughout Inland Southern California, and could not be happier with the added value to the project team. Bob Gregory has expertise in the field of “Dry Utilities,” which encompasses administrative, operational, and design knowledge for Power Companies, Telephone Companies, Gas Companies, CATV Companies, and Specialized Telecommunications Companies. Of particular interest is his expertise in major infrastructure for large Roadway Interchange Projects and major Grade Separation projects, as well as his knowledge in dealings with SCE and DWP Transmission facilities and Dry Utility Rights-of-Way issues.
717

CASE ROAD BRIDGE AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
City of Perris
WEBB provided multidisciplinary engineering services for the Case Road Bridge Improvement Project, a major bridge replacement and multimodal corridor improvement project located along Case Road over the San Jacinto River in the City of Perris. The project replaces the existing structurally deficient two-lane bridge, originally constructed in 1927, with a new four-lane bridge crossing designed to improve regional mobility, traffic operations, hydraulic performance, safety, and active transportation connectivity. The project has been approved and is currently under construction.The new bridge structure consists of a 163-foot-long and 77-foot6-inch-wide precast prestressed concrete I-girder bridge accommodating four travel lanes, a painted median, shoulders, and a separated 12-foot-wide bike path/future multipurpose trail. The project also includes roadway widening, staged construction, drainage improvements, utility coordination, and environmental enhancements associated with the San Jacinto River corridor.

WEBB’s services included roadway and civil engineering design, traffic and transportation engineering, multimodal and active transportation design, utility coordination, roadway drainage integration, geometric roadway improvements, and interagency coordination. WEBB worked closely with the City of Perris, regulatory agencies, and the broader consultant team to advance a context-sensitive bridge solution that balanced transportation needs, constructability, hydraulic constraints, environmental considerations, and long-term corridor functionality.A key component of the project involved extensive coordination with environmental and resource agencies, including the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA). The final bridge configuration incorporated widened bridge openings, wildlife crossing benches, improved drainage features, and reduced permanent disturbance areas to support regional wildlife movement and minimize impacts within the San Jacinto River corridor. The revised project design reduced permanent impacts within the river corridor by more than 55 percent compared to earlier design concepts.WEBB also brought significant San Jacinto River and regional hydraulic corridor experience to the project through its Water Resources team. WEBB has extensive experience performing hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, flood control coordination, and drainage infrastructure design throughout Riverside County, including hydraulic modeling of the San Jacinto River from Railroad Canyon to the existing Army Corps levee in the City of San Jacinto. WEBB’s experience includes preparation of master drainage plans, regional flood control studies, storm drain improvements, channel design, and backbone drainage infrastructure for complex transportation and flood control projects throughout the region.This experience was instrumental in supporting the hydraulic coordination and drainage integration required for the Case Road Bridge crossing, including bridge freeboard analysis, scour considerations, drainage conveyance improvements, and coordination with future San Jacinto River Master Drainage Plan improvements. WEBB’s familiarity with local agency standards, permitting requirements, and regional flood control objectives helped streamline coordination and advance a practical and resilient bridge design solution within a constrained river environment.The project demonstrates WEBB’s experience delivering complex bridge and corridor improvement projects requiring integrated roadway and bridge coordination, multimodal transportation design, utility and drainage integration, hydraulic coordination, environmental stewardship, stakeholder collaboration, and phased construction implementation within constrained and environmentally sensitive environments.

Project Highlights
Reference:

John Pourkazemi
City Engineer
1015 S G. St, Perris, CA 92570
[email protected]
951.943.6100 Ext. 116
Duration:
2019 - 2025
Construction Cost:
$12.8 M
Project Team:

Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Scott Hildebrandt, PE
Nicholas Lowe, PE, TE
Joseph Caldwell, PE, CPESC,

CPSWQ, QSD, QSP, CFM
Stephanie Standerfer
Son Le
Deborah Saulina
Project Experience

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
36 718

PERRIS LOGISTICS CENTER (PLC) NORTH OFF-SITE

IMPROVEMENTS
City of Perris
WEBB provided multidisciplinary engineering, environmental, survey, utility coordination, and construction support services for the Perris Logistics Center (PLC) North Off-Site Improvements Project in the City of Perris for IDI Logistics. The infrastructure program supported more than six million square feet of industrial development within 416 acres in South Perris and included roadway, bridge, interchange, drainage, utility, railroad, environmental, and multimodal improvements.

The project included final engineering, permitting, utility coordination, traffic control, environmental clearance, biological mitigation support, survey and mapping, right-of-way engineering, reimbursement coordination, and construction support services for off-site infrastructure improvements associated with TPM 35877. Improvements supported regional goods movement, industrial access, multimodal circulation, and backbone infrastructure needs throughout the South Perris logistics corridor.

Major improvements included widening and reconstruction of Case Road, Ellis Avenue, and Redlands Avenue; I-215/SR-74/ Case Road interchange improvements processed through Caltrans Streamlined Oversight; Case Road Bridge improvements over the San Jacinto River; railroad crossing and traffic signal improvements; regional drainage, hydrology, hydraulic, and water quality improvements; traffic control and phased construction staging; utility coordination and relocation; environmental clearance and permitting; right-of-way engineering and property acquisition support; and preparation of reimbursement agreements and funding coordination documents.

A major component of the project involved coordination for the Case Road Bridge crossing of the San Jacinto River, including bridge type selection, hydraulic analysis, staged construction evaluation, geotechnical coordination, constructability review, scour considerations, utility conflicts, drainage improvements, railroad coordination, environmental permitting, and final PS&E development consistent with Caltrans and AASHTO standards.

The bridge improvements were designed to accommodate ultimate General Plan circulation requirements while maintaining regional mobility and supporting future freight demand.

Environmental services included CEQA IS/MND preparation, Section 404/401 permitting support, biological reports, delineations, CRAM evaluations, and coordination with the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Western Riverside County MSHCP requirements.

WEBB coordinated with the City of Perris, Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Riverside County Transportation Commission, SCRRA/ Metrolink, utility providers, environmental resource agencies, and consultant teams to advance the program through environmental clearance, final design, permitting, reimbursement coordination, and phased implementation.

Project Highlights
Reference:

John Pourkazemi
City Engineer
1015 S G. St, Perris, CA 92570
[email protected]
951.943.6100 Ext. 116
Duration:
2019 - 2025
Construction Cost:
$5.5 M
Project Team:

Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Nicholas Lowe, PE, TE
Son Le
Eliza Laws
Andrew Vollrath
Ryan Daniel, PE

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
37 719
NORTH INDIO CHANNEL PHASE 1 AND 2
Coachella Valley Water District
WEBB provided comprehensive project administration for the North Indio Regional Flood Control Project, where we oversaw the project's lifecycle, ensuring that every phase, from inception through to completion, adhered to the highest standards and timelines. We engaged in extensive project research to understand the complexities of the region's hydrology and geotechnical characteristics. This thorough investigation enabled us to design a flood control system tailored to the area's needs, incorporating advanced surveying and mapping techniques to delineate project boundaries and identify critical infrastructure components. Utility potholing was another vital service we provided, which involved precise detection and mapping of underground utilities to prevent disruptions and ensure project safety. Our hydraulic analysis and geotechnical investigation formed the backbone of our design process, ensuring the proposed solutions were practical and robust, capable of withstanding the region's flood risk.

Furthermore, WEBB's engagement extended beyond traditional engineering tasks to encompass a broad spectrum of activities critical for the project's success and community acceptance. We undertook environmental documentation to assess the project's impact on the local ecosystem, meticulously preparing reports to comply with regulatory standards and achieve necessary clearances. Recognizing the importance of community involvement, our public outreach efforts were designed to inform and involve local stakeholders, facilitating a smooth project implementation process. We also handled all easements and property acquisitions, coordinating negotiations and legal methods to secure the land required for the flood control measures. In addition, once construction commenced, WEBB provided support to address any technical challenges that arose, ensuring the project's objectives were met without compromise. Together, these services illustrated WEBB's holistic approach to project management and engineering, solidifying our role as a key player in enhancing flood resilience for the North Indio Community and beyond.

Project Highlights
Reference:

David Wilson, PE
Engineering Manager
51501 Tyler Street, Coachella,
CA 92236
[email protected]
760.398.2661 Ext. 2736
Duration:
2013 - 2025
Construction Cost:
$110.2 M
Project Team:

Malissa Martinez
Eric Hays, PE
Scott Hildebrandt, PE
Joseph Caldwell, PE, CPESC,

CPSWQ, QSD, QSP, CFM
Dilesh Sheth, PE, TE
Nicholas Lowe, PE, TE
Ricardo Perez, PE

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
38 720

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
39 La Novia Avenue Bridge Replacement - PA&ED and PS&E, City of San Juan Capistrano
Status: Preliminary Design (35%)
Client Contact:
• City of San Juan Capistrano
• George Alvarez
• 949.443.6351
Mark Thomas is leading planning and preliminary engineering for the replacement of the La Novia Avenue Bridge over San Juan Creek. The project replaces an existing two-lane structure with a four-lane bridge designed to meet future capacity needs while accommodating multimodal users. The design incorporates pedestrian and equestrian facilities, requiring specialized considerations for user safety, separation, and accessibility. Geometric design and cross-section development were informed by traffic projections and community needs, ensuring a balanced and functional corridor. Environmental and hydraulic constraints are significant, with the project located in a sensitive creek environment.

Detailed studies are evaluating floodplain impacts, habitat considerations, and permitting requirements to inform a compliant and constructible design solution. Structural analysis is focused on developing an efficient bridge system that minimizes in-channel impacts while maintaining durability and long-term performance. Foundation design and span configuration are being optimized based on geotechnical conditions and hydraulic requirements. The project highlights the ability to deliver technically sound bridge replacements in environmentally constrained settings. The outcome will be a context-sensitive, multi-use structure that improves capacity, enhances user experience, and meets regulatory and community expectations.

Nuevo Road Bridge Replacement over San Jacinto River PA&ED and PS&E, Riverside County
Status: PS&E in Progress
Client Contact:
• Umer Ahmed
• Riverside County Transportation Department
• 951.955.1637
• [email protected]
Mark Thomas is delivering PA&ED and PS&E for the replacement and widening of the Nuevo Road Bridge, a critical east-west connector serving the Perris region.

The project replaces a structurally deficient crossing with a modern four-lane facility designed to accommodate current and future traffic demands. The team performed detailed traffic analysis and corridor modeling to optimize lane configurations, intersection tie-ins, and multimodal accommodations. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities were integrated into the design to enhance connectivity and safety for all users along the corridor. Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling played a central role in the design, evaluating river flow characteristics, floodplain impacts, and scour conditions. These analyses informed bridge span length, foundation type, and channel protection measures to ensure long-term performance and regulatory compliance. Through iterative design refinement and value engineering, Mark Thomas reduced the overall project footprint, minimizing right-of-way impacts and environmental disturbance. These optimizations resulted in more than $2 million in construction cost savings while maintaining full project functionality and performance objectives. The project demonstrates direct relevance to Perris conditions, including similar hydraulic constraints, regulatory requirements, and traffic demands. The outcome will be a resilient, cost-efficient bridge replacement that improves safety, capacity, and long-term infrastructure reliability for the region.

I-215/Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange & Bridge Widening - PA&ED, City of Perris
Status: Advanced Planning Study (APS) Completed; Design Ongoing Client Contact:
• City of Murrieta
• Bob Moehling
• 951.461.6036
With the support of WEBB Associates as its subconsultant, Mark Thomas is supporting the City of Perris in evaluating interchange improvements at I-215 and Harley Knox Boulevard, including bridge widening and ramp reconfiguration. The project addresses increasing traffic demand and operational deficiencies at a key regional interchange. The design team conducted traffic forecasting through horizon year 2050, evaluating multiple design alternatives to improve capacity, safety, and operational efficiency. Geometric design and operational analysis were used to assess interchange spacing constraints, ramp configurations, and queueing conditions. These analyses informed the selection of preferred alternatives that maximize performance within existing right-ofway and infrastructure limitations. Alternatives included a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), which was analyzed for its ability to reduce conflict points and improve traffic flow. Coordination with Caltrans and regional stakeholders continues to be critical to ensure design feasibility, compliance with state standards, and obtain environmental clearance in the coming months. This project demonstrates deep familiarity with Perris infrastructure, traffic patterns, and regulatory environment. The outcome is a set of technically vetted, performance-driven solutions that position the City for additional funding aid and successful implementation of the interchange improvements.

Mark Thomas Bridge Project Experience
721

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
40 ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER CONTACT
NAME:

PHONE FAX (A/C, No, Ext): (A/C, No):

E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP TYPE OF INSURANCE (MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTED CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO- POLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
OTHER: $

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident) $
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $
OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $

HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident) $
$

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $

PER OTH- STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A (Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$
$
$
$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
8/28/2025
License # 0757776
(951) 779-8558 (951) 231-2572
25674
Albert A. Webb Associates
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, CA 92506
19437
15792
A 1,000,000
P-630-8W805292-TIL-25 9/1/2025 9/1/2026 300,000
5,000
1,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
A 1,000,000
BA-9T94622A-25-43-G 9/1/2025 9/1/2026
A 2,000,000
CUP-9T948494-25-43 9/1/2025 9/1/2026 2,000,000
0 A
UB-4J648178-25-43-G 9/1/2025 9/1/2026 1,000,000 Y 1,000,000 1,000,000
B Professional Liab. 031711122 9/1/2025 Ded $25k/EaClaim 2M 2,000,000 C Cyber Liability ESO0140474549 9/1/2025 9/1/2026 Ded:$2,500 / Occ/Agg 2,000,000 For Informational Purposes Only.
**For Insured's Purpose Only**
ALBEAWE-01 RDEANDA
HUB International Insurance Services Inc.

PO Box 5345
Riverside, CA 92517
Kristie Koehrer
[email protected]
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
Lexington Insurance Company
Lloyd's of London
X
9/1/2026
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
Evidence of Insurance
722
APPENDIX A: ENVIRONMENTAL SCOPE OF WORK

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
41 Cabri
Appalachi
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
APPENDIX A:

ENVIRONMENTAL

SCOPE OF WORK
723

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
42 TASK - 7.1 AIR QUALITY / GREENHOUSE GAS

ANALYSIS
WEBB will prepare an Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas (AQ/GHG) Analysis in accordance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements to evaluate the construction emissions from the Project. It is assumed that operational emissions sources are negligible and are evaluated qualitatively. The analysis will:
• Calculate emissions from construction activities from a single design of the Project using the SCAQMDrecommended CalEEMod (version 2022.1) program. • Prepare a regional significance threshold analysis as well as a localized significance threshold analysis using the LST Look-Up Tables, per SCAQMD requirements.
• Compare Project emissions to SCAQMD draft GHG
thresholds.
• Analyze model results and incorporate mitigation
measures, as appropriate, into the computer model.

It is assumed that all modeling assumptions will be
approved by the City prior to the commencement of
any modeling and that all data required will be readily available and provided by the City.

A technical memorandum will summarize Project-related
emissions, identify potential impacts from the Project, and recommend mitigation measures to reduce those impacts, as appropriate. WEBB will also calculate the energy consumption from construction activities associated with the proposed Project. Energy calculations will be presented in tables and included under separate cover. This scope includes revisions from one round of City comments that are editorial in nature.

TASK - 7.2 MSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS AND
REPORT
Prior to conducting any field work, ECORP will coordinate with the Client to discuss contract responsibilities, scope of work, site access, any field restrictions, data collection, scheduled deliverables, submittal preferences, and other Project-related details.

Additionally, during the Project, as needed, ECORP will attend Project meetings or conference calls with the Client via phone or online platform such as Microsoft Teams or Zoom, provide general technical support, provide Project status updates and updated schedules, and maintain regular communication with the Client. In addition, ECORP Senior Biologists will be available as needed to participate in meetings, communications, and negotiations with the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and the resources agencies (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS], Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB], U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [USACE], and California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW]) should those be necessary above and beyond what is assumed for each relevant task below.

ECORP has assumed up to 30 hours for this task. Coordination will be conducted via email/phone or online meeting application such as Microsoft Teams, as mutually agreed upon by the participants. No in-person meetings are assumed with this task.

If the number or type of requests for out-of-scope assistance exceeds what can be accommodated by this budget, based
on a best-efforts basis, then a contract amendment will be requested.

Our understanding is that the Project site will need
assessments for, at a minimum, burrowing owl habitat and riparian/riverine resources, vernal pool, and fairy shrimp habitat (assumes no focused surveys needed for any riparian resources; if habitat is identified, contract amendments will be required) for compliance under Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP.

Literature Review: Using our knowledge of the biological resources under the MSHCP within the Perris area and public databases, an ECORP biologist will conduct a literature review to determine if there are any records of listed and/or special-status plant and wildlife species occurring on or in the vicinity of the site. This task will include a review of CDFW’s California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), the California Native Plant Society’s Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI) of Rare and Endangered Plants, the RCA’s MSHCP Information App, the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC), the USFWS Critical Habitat Portal, the USFWS National
Wetlands Inventory (NWI), a review of any available previous biological studies completed for the Project, and a review of other documentation that is relevant for evaluating biological resources, including species occurrence potential (e.g., range maps of special-status species) for relevant information.

Field Assessment: After conducting the literature review, biologists familiar with the biological resources associated with the Perris area will conduct a reconnaissance-level biological field survey at the Project site. The field survey will focus primarily on a burrowing owl habitat assessment and an assessment of any riparian/riverine or vernal pool and fairy shrimp habitat as required by Section 6 of the MSHCP.

These tasks are detailed below. In addition, the assessment will identify potential biological constraints to development, including federally or state-listed, or otherwise special-status, plant and wildlife species and sensitive habitats. The results of the reconnaissance-level surveys will be recorded electronically, and photographs will be taken to document the current
conditions of the Project site and vicinity. All species of plants and animals observed during the field survey will be recorded.

Habitats and vegetation communities will be mapped.

Representative photographs will be taken to document the site conditions at the time of the survey. A list of plant and wildlife species will be recorded during the survey. If any special-status biological resources are found within the Project site, their location will be recorded.

The Proposed Project site is located within the area covered by the Western Riverside County MSHCP and is subject to the requirements of the Plan. Therefore, at a minimum, habitat assessments for riparian/ riverine, vernal pool, and fairy shrimp (MSHCP Section 6.1.2), narrow endemic plant species (MSHCP Section 6.1.3), burrowing owl (Section 6.3.2), and the urban/ wildlands interface (MSHCP Section 6.1.4) would be required for compliance under the MSHCP. If a vernal pool or fairy shrimp habitat is found to be present on the site, then a fairy shrimp survey may be conducted under an additional task not included in this proposal. ECORP assumes there is no habitat for special-status riparian bird species overlapping or within 500 feet of the Proposed Project site; no riparian bird surveys are included.

MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report: An MSHCP
Consistency Analysis Report that describes the Proposed Project within the context of the MSHCP requirements will be prepared. Included in the discussion will be the Project area’s position with respect to Area Plan designations, Criteria Cells, and Subunit designations. Special survey areas within the Project area, such as the burrowing owl survey area (Section

6.3.2), their location(s) within the Project site, and compliance with the MSHCP will be discussed. The analysis will discuss riparian/riverine areas, vernal pools, and fairy shrimp habitats (Section 6.1.2) as determined by the field assessment.

After completion of the field assessment and any focused surveys for burrowing owl, CBB, bats, and/or fairy shrimp, ECORP will prepare a MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report
detailing the results of the aforementioned literature review, field assessment, focused surveys, and MSHCP consistency.

The report will be prepared in accordance with the RCA’s Consistency Analysis template and will include a Project 724

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
43 description, methods used to conduct the surveys, a
description of existing biological conditions on the site, and summaries of the results of focused surveys, as applicable.

Lists of wildlife and plant species observed during the surveys will be included as an appendix. Any habitat for burrowing owl, CBB, bats, riparian/riverine, vernal pool, least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, western yellow-billed cuckoo, and fairy shrimp habitats identified within the Project site will be presented.

The report will also identify any areas on the site that are potentially subject to USACE, RWQCB, or CDFW jurisdiction and describe the potential need for permits with these
regulatory agencies, if applicable. However, an aquatic resource delineation (ARD) will be completed as a separate task with a separate report, including, if necessary, a discussion of applicable regulatory permitting requirements.

ECORP will provide one electronic copy of the draft MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report for review. After incorporating responses to one round of complete and compiled comments, ECORP will prepare a final version that will be submitted to the Client electronically.

TASK 7.2.1 - FOCUSED PLANT SURVEYS
Surveys for narrow endemic plant species and the criteria area plant species are required because the Proposed Project site overlaps with designated survey areas for these resources, as specified in the MSHCP. One ECORP biologist will conduct focused plant surveys, including two survey events to
adequately cover the species that may be present.

The results of the focused plant surveys will be presented in the MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report, associated with Task

2. The report will describe the survey methodology, survey conditions, and results with maps depicting the Project site and locations of any special-status plant observations. Discussion of the survey results in the report will be in accordance with the MSHCP consistency analysis requirements for all applicable surveys.

TASK 7.2.2 - FOCUSED BURROWING OWL

SURVEYS
If burrowing owl habitat is found to be present on the site (including the presence of suitably-sized burrows), then focused burrowing owl surveys will need to be conducted in accordance with Section 6 of the MSHCP. The focused surveys will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines provided in the MSHCP. The protocol requires that a focused burrow survey (Part A) and three additional focused burrowing owl surveys (Part B) be conducted between March 1 and August

31. All four surveys are assumed to be included in this task and will be conducted to fulfill the MSHCP burrowing owl survey requirements.

Each of the four focused burrowing owl surveys will consist of initially conducting a visual survey of all suitable habitat with special focus on any previously mapped burrows, owl sign, and owls, including perch locations, in order to ascertain owl presence. Following the visual survey, the owl and owl sign survey will then be conducted within suitable habitat across the entire Project site and the adjacent 150 meters, where accessible. These pedestrian surveys will be conducted by walking transects spaced approximately 10 to 20 meters apart to achieve 100-percent visual coverage of the ground surface.

During the pedestrian surveys, the biologist will record all burrowing owl observations, occupied burrows, and burrows with owl sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, and bones of prey items) that were not previously identified during the habitat assessment survey. The biologist will also note the number of individual owls, owl pairs, juveniles, and any behavior, such as courtship and mating. The surveys will be conducted in the morning, one hour before sunrise to two hours after sunrise, or in the early evening, two hours before sunset to one hour after sunset, during favorable weather conditions (e.g., wind less than 20 miles per hour, temperature less than 90 degrees Fahrenheit). All location data will be documented on field data sheets and recorded using a GPS.

The results of the focused burrowing owl surveys will be presented in the MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report. The report will describe the survey methodology, survey conditions, and results, including the locations of any burrowing owl observations, occupied burrowing owl burrows, and potential burrows. The report will also include maps depicting the Project site, suitable burrowing owl habitat, and the locations of any burrowing owl observations or burrows. Discussion of the survey results in the report will be in accordance with the MSHCP Consistency Analysis requirements for all applicable surveys.

TASK 7.2.3 - CROTCH’S BUMBLE BEE SURVEYS
If Crotch’s bumble bee (CBB) habitat is found to be present on the site, CBB-focused surveys will be conducted in accordance with the 2019 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service protocol for the Rusty Patched bumble bee, with species-specific adjustments based on CDFW’s Survey Considerations for CESA Candidate Bumble Bee Species dated June 6, 2023. Three surveys will be conducted during the CBB colony active period (MarchAugust). To the extent possible, surveys will coincide with peak blooms of various flowering resources in the CBB Survey Area and will be timed a minimum of two weeks apart. Paved and developed areas will be excluded from surveys. The surveying biologist will walk meandering transects throughout all nonexcluded habitats within the Project site in order to determine the presence of CBB and its potential use of the site for foraging, nesting, and overwintering.

Surveys will only be conducted at least one hour after sunrise and ending at least two hours before sunset (ideally between 9am and 1pm) during appropriate weather conditions when temperatures are between 65°F and 90°F. Wet conditions (e.g., foggy, raining, or drizzling) and periods of sustained high winds greater than 8 miles per hour will be avoided. The surveyor will conduct visual, non-capture surveys using close-focusing binoculars to search for, identify, and count (or estimate) bumble bees. Surveys will be conducted at an average
rate of 3 acres per hour, with more time spent in areas with flowering resources and less time in areas without them. Digital photographs will be used to document and identify bumble bees. In addition, representative photographs of the habitat will be taken for each CBB detection, and the specific floral use of each CBB will be described. The locations of all CBB and any incidental special-status species detections will be recorded using a GPS-enabled device. Wildlife species detected will be recorded in field notes (with emphasis on identification of other pollinators in flight), and plants in flower at the time of each survey will be noted. Inaccessible areas (private property, sheer canyon walls) within the CBB Survey Area will be surveyed utilizing binoculars.

If the Client requests that these surveys be completed, the results of the focused CBB surveys will be presented in the MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report, associated with Task

2. The number and timing of surveys, as well as the results of survey efforts, will be presented. The report will also include a general description of any potential CBB habitat identified, areas excluded from surveys, photographs, and a map showing the locations of any CBB and incidentally observed specialstatus species. 725

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
44 Task 7.2.3 Assumptions:
• The CBB Survey Area assumes a 100-foot survey buffer
around all potential impact areas and a maximum of 15
acres in a single day.
• Costing assumes one biologist on a single 8-hour day
(inclusive of travel) for each of three survey sessions for a total of three person days.
• Costing assumes the biologist can cover 3 acres
of suitable habitat per hour and 5 hours of suitable
weather conditions each survey day. Should the onsite
conditions or weather dictate more or less survey effort is required, the Client will be notified. Microclimate
cannot be determined in advance, but surveys will be
scheduled for days with forecasted suitable weather
conditions.
• Non-lethal, netting surveys by a Biologist who holds a Scientific Collecting Permit and Letter of Authorization or Memorandum of Understanding to net CBB during
its Candidacy period are not included but can be
conducted upon request. An extra cost of $400 for
preparation and submittal of a DFW 1379b notification
form, survey protocol, and tailored resumes to CDFW, a
minimum of 15 days prior to the start of surveys, would apply.

TASK 7.3 - DETERMINATION OF BIOLOGICALLY

EQUIVALENT OR SUPERIOR PRESERVATION
(DBESP)
The MSHCP-required process by which the Client must
demonstrate adequate replacement of biological functions and values begins with the submission of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) report.

To ensure compliance with the MSHCP in relation to Section

6.1.2 (riparian/riverine and vernal pool habitats and affiliated species), ECORP will prepare a DBESP document that adheres to the template provided by RCA and describes avoidance, minimization, and mitigation efforts of the Project in the context of Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. Impacts that cannot be feasibly avoided must be mitigated so that lost functions and values associated with MSHCP-identified species and sensitive
habitats are replaced. The DBESP report will be prepared in a manner consistent with the MSHCP and RCA guidelines and will contain the following required elements:
• Definition of the Project area and discussion of the
Project area relationship to the Reserve Assembly.
• A written Project description, demonstrating why an
avoidance alternative is not feasible.
• A written description of biological information available for the Project site, including the results of resource mapping and required biological resource survey data.
• Quantification of unavoidable impacts to riparian/
riverine areas associated with the Project, including
direct and indirect effects.
• A written description of Project design features and
mitigation measures that reduce indirect effects, such
as edge treatments, landscaping, elevation difference,
minimization, and/or compensation through restoration
or enhancement. This includes an analysis of the
functions and values affected by the proposed Project,
as well as those of the habitat to be created.
• A finding demonstrating that although the proposed
Project would not avoid impacts, with the proposed
design and compensation measures, the Project would
be biologically equivalent or superior to that which
would occur under an avoidance alternative without
these measures, based on one or more of the following
factors: effects on Conserved Habitats; effects on
MSHCP-identified species; and, effects on riparian
linkages and function of the MSHCP Conservation
Area.

The proposed compensation measures presented in the
DBESP report will be based on measures discussed with and agreed upon by the Client. Up to two (2) one-hour conference call meetings with the ECORP Project Manager and/or
biologist/regulatory specialist are included in this task to finalize the agreed-upon mitigation requirements outlined in the DBESP.

ECORP has included a total of 76 hours to prepare the
DBESP. The scope under this task includes the preparation and submittal of a draft DBESP report to the Client, one draft revision, and the submittal of a final version to the Client, all in electronic format.

TASK 7.4 - AQUATIC RESOURCES DELINEATION

AND REPORT
ECORP will conduct an aquatic resources delineation for the approximately 7-acre Proposed Project site in accordance with methodology outlined in the USACE Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987), the Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (USACE 2008a), and A Field Guide to the Ordinary High Water Mark in the Arid West Region of the Western United States (USACE 2008b), as well as in accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredges or Fill Material to Waters of the State (adopted April 2, 2019). Prior to conducting field work, ECORP will review existing available information for the site, including the National Wetland Inventory, U.S. Geological Survey topographic
mapping, soil survey mapping, and aerial imagery (recent and historic).

ECORP delineation specialists will visit the site to identify and map all aquatic resources present within the Project site. The boundaries of all aquatic features, including potential Waters of the U.S. and/or State, will be delineated in the field using a GPS device capable of submeter accuracy. The boundaries of potential CDFW jurisdictional streambed/riparian habitat will also be delineated during the site visit, following the guidance and definitions in Sections 1600-1602 of the California Fish and Game Code. Indicators of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) and paired sample point data of vegetation, soils, and hydrology will be used as needed to support the determination of boundaries of aquatic features. Munsell Soil Color Charts (Munsell Color 2009) and the Web Soil Survey (NRCS 2026) will be used to aid in identifying hydric soils in the field. The Jepson eFlora 2026 edition and the USACE National Wetland Plant List (USACE 2022) will be used for plant nomenclature and identification.

An Aquatic Resources Delineation Report and delineation maps of the findings will be submitted to the Client and will include a description of existing site conditions, field methods, and results of the aquatic resources delineation. The report will be formatted in accordance with the most recent USACE guidance.

A draft report will be prepared and submitted to the client for comment. One round of consolidated comments will be addressed, and the report will then be finalized.

Task 7.4 Assumptions:
• The scope assumes that the Project site, including
construction/disturbance limits, will be provided as
closed polyline or polygon features in ESRI shapefile(s), ESRI/geodatabase(s), or AutoCAD file(s) in a defined
and clearly stated grid coordinate system on either a
single layer or on multiple layers to ECORP at the start of preparation with clear direction given to what layers constitute the Project footprints. The construction
limits need to include the Project site, potential staging areas, material storage areas, toes of slope, disposal
726

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
45 sites, access routes, and proposed mitigation sites
(if applicable). This task assumes that no changes
occur to the original 7-acre Project site or design after initiation of the task.
• The scope assumes that access to the entire Project
site will be granted. In areas where access is not
permitted or in areas that are unsafe to access (e.g.,
steep cliffs, unstable hillsides, thick woody vegetation, poisonous plants), ECORP will use aerial imagery to
desktop map the features, and this will be discussed as a limitation in the report.
• This scope assumes the delineation will be conducted
by two biologists over one 10-hour day, provided
temperatures do not exceed 95°F (e.g., extreme heat).

If the survey must be performed during periods of
extreme heat, additional field survey days may be
needed to account for the safety of surveyors, and a
change order may be necessary.
• This task does not include a Project-specific impact
analysis (e.g., figures showing specific limits of
permanent and temporary impacts and/or associated
impact calculations) and does not include coordination
or consultation with the regulatory agencies or
preparation of permit applications.

TASK 7.5 - HABITAT EVALUATION AND

NEGOTIATION STRATEGY (HANS) AND JOINT

PROJECT REVIEW (JPR) APPLICATIONS AND

ADDITIONAL RESERVE LANDS EQUIVALENCY

ANALYSIS
The Project occurs within two MSHCP Criteria Cells, and the HANS process is anticipated to be necessary based on the conservation descriptions provided in the MSHCP. ECORP
has scoped to complete the initial step of this process, known as ‘HANS I,’ which entails submittal of the HANS application, a review by the RCA of the application materials, and
issuance by the RCA of a HANS criteria determination letter and exhibit provided to the applicant. The remaining steps in the HANS process are dependent on the content of that criteria determination letter, since the letter outlines proposed conservation on the parcel, studies to undertake, and other matters related to meeting MSHCP consistency. Because these steps are unknown at the time of this scoping, this task only covers the HANS I portion of the process. Additional scope items that may be needed as a requirement of the criteria determination letter will be scoped in the future, as needed, along with a request for a contract amendment.

Under this task, ECORP will assist the Client with preparing the HANS application and initiating the JPR process. ECORP will assist the Client in filling out the proper form (HANS Application) and presenting the Project to the RCA as part of their JPR process. This task assumes ECORP will attend up to four virtual meetings with the Client, City, and the RCA throughout the HANS and JPR process (up to 32 hours of labor). For each of the meetings, we assume ECORP will prepare a brief slide presentation or summary handout and will follow up with a meeting summary or minutes document. ECORP also assumes up to 28 hours of coordination with the Client, City, and RCA.

ECORP has assumed 29 hours related to the HANS task and a total of 23 hours related to the JPR task.

Since the Project may impact existing Additional Reserve Land (ARL) protected by the MSHCP and owned by the Regional
Conservation Authority, we expect that an equivalency analysis will need to be completed as part of the JPR process. As such, this task includes scope for ECORP to prepare supplemental analysis that will be needed to reach MSHCP Consistency.

ECORP will approach this task by conducting background
research and performing a field assessment of the property being proposed as mitigation/replacement land. Following the research and survey, ECORP will prepare a Reserve
Replacement Equivalency Report to MSHCP standards. The
report will be based on guidance provided by the RCA.

In preparation for writing the report, ECORP will conduct a review of the available biological information for the Proposed Project, along with the mitigation requirement(s) as described by the RCA. We assume that any previous biological studies of the proposed replacement land will be made available to ECORP for review. Any available resources under the MSHCP will be examined, including the MSHCP Baseline Vegetation Data within the replacement land. ECORP will also conduct a database search of existing public information sources, including but not limited to the CNDDB, to develop an expected species occurrence profile for the replacement land.

After background research has been completed, ECORP
will conduct a biological survey of the replacement land to map vegetation communities, identify habitats present that may support special-status plant and wildlife species, and to preliminarily map any drainages present (a formal delineation of potentially jurisdictional aquatic features will not be performed).

Representative photographs will be taken of the replacement land and its resources. If any special-status plant or wildlife species are incidentally observed, their location(s) will be recorded on maps. A full plant and animal species list will be collected during the survey.

Following the survey, ECORP will prepare a report that meets the analysis requirements for the Reserve Replacement
Equivalency findings. The report will provide background information, methods, a description and quantification of the impacts on existing reserve lands (within the Project site), a description of existing conditions of the reserve replacement lands, and supporting figures. Figures to be included will be a location/vicinity map, a map of the proposed impact (temporary and permanent impacts) to reserve lands within the Project site, a map of the proposed replacement lands, existing vegetation/land cover of both the affected areas and replacement lands, and the MSHCP baseline vegetation/land cover for both the affected reserve areas and the replacement lands. An equivalency finding will be prepared to compare the affected lands with the reserve replacement lands, describing the various resources present and demonstrating consistency with the MSHCP. ECORP will submit a draft report for review to the City and prepare a submittal for the RCA based on any City comments received. We anticipate two rounds of review and comment on the document before it can be finalized.

Task 7.5 Assumptions:
• Assumes addressing two rounds of complete and
compiled comments on the HANS Application prepared
by ECORP, resulting in three drafts of the application. • Assumes addressing two rounds of complete and
compiled comments on the JPR Application prepared
by ECORP, resulting in three drafts of the application. • This task does not include any permit or processing
fees that may be associated with the HANS or JPR
Applications.
• ECORP will attend up to four meetings. For each
meeting, ECORP will prepare a brief slide presentation, upon request, or summary handout(s) and meeting
summary document.
• Up to 28 hours of coordination time with Webb and/
or the Client outside of the official HANS and JPR
coordination with the RCA is included.
727

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
46 7.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

AND PALEONTOLOGICAL MEMO (APPLIED

EARTHWORKS)
Literature and Records Search
Æ will complete a cultural resource literature and records search at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System, housed at San Diego State University. We assume the total fee for the SCIC records search will not exceed $600.00. Based on the size of the Project and records search limits, Æ estimates approximately a 6 week turnaround time for the SCIC literature and records search.

Sacred Lands File Search and Tribal Follow-up
Æ will contact the California Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) for a search of the Sacred Lands File.

The NAHC is experiencing delays in response time, and the current turnaround time for the Sacred Lands File search is approximately 4–6 weeks. Æ will follow up by contacting Tribes/ individuals identified by the NAHC with local Traditional Use Areas who may have information regarding Native American cultural resources within the Project vicinity. Æ will initiate contact by email letter, followed by an email or telephone call.

Æ assumes the City will be responsible for conducting all Assembly Bill (AB) 52 consultation efforts.

Cultural Field Survey
Upon receipt of the records search results, an Æ qualified archaeologist will conduct an intensive pedestrian field survey of the Project area (approximately 7 acres). Æ’s survey transect spacing will range from 10 to 15 meters (30 to 50 feet) insofar as possible, and the ground surface of all landforms with likely intact and significant cultural resources, if any, also will be examined. Additionally, Æ’s archaeologist will investigate any unusual contours, soil changes, distinctive vegetation patterns, features (e.g., road cuts, ditches, and stream cuts), and other potential cultural site markers. For the cultural resource survey, Æ is not responsible for landowner permissions and access to the Project area. Safe access must be ensured by the client.

For the purposes of this price estimate, we assume that once the cultural resource, Goetz Bridge, is documented on the appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR).

Æ will accomplish this through a combination of fieldwork and desktop research. We will characterize the existing bridge, document its location in relation to the Project area, complete archival research, evaluate its significance using criteria set forth in the CRHR, and develop appropriate mitigation measures if necessary. Fieldwork will involve visual inspection and photo-documentation of the built environment resource within the Project area.

Cultural Resource Report
Upon completion of the field investigation, Æ will prepare a report that meets CEQA standards. This report will describe the Project, cultural setting, desktop and field investigation methods, survey results, resource evaluations, and provide management recommendations. The report will also
incorporate the results of the SCIC records search, as well as communications with the NAHC and local Native American
Tribes. Æ assumes that one round of minor comments will need to be addressed following the City’s review of the draft technical report and that no major revisions will be required.

Æ’s draft report will be submitted electronically in MS Word format for ease of review; our final report will be submitted electronically as a PDF file.

PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCE TASKS
Museum Search and Literature Review
According to the 2013 County of Riverside paleontological sensitivity map, the Project area (~100%) is ranked as High B (Hb) Sensitivity, because fossils are likely to be encountered at or below four feet of depth. Æ will request a museum records search at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (NHMLAC) for recorded paleontological resource localities within and in the vicinity of the Project boundary. We assume the total records search fee will not exceed $500.00. The current turnaround time for the NHMLAC is generally 2 weeks.

As part of this task, we will also review the online records of the University of California Museum of Paleontology and the Paleobiology Database. Æ’s paleontology staff will supplement museum collections records by completing a review of
published and unpublished geologic mapping and scientific literature to further characterize the geology and paleontology of the Project area.

Paleontological Field Survey
Upon receipt of the museum records search results and
completion of the literature review, a qualified Æ paleontologist will conduct a pedestrian field survey of the Project area.

The purpose of the field survey will be to visually inspect the ground surface for exposed paleontological resources within the Project area, to note the sediments exposed within the Project area, and to evaluate geologic exposures for their potential to contain significant subsurface paleontology. For the paleontological survey, we anticipate no discoveries of paleontological resources (i.e., significant or insignificant) that will require documentation or evaluation during the field survey.

As a health and safety precaution, we plan for our
paleontologist to conduct the paleontological resource field survey concurrently with the archaeologist’s cultural field survey. As with the cultural survey, Æ is not responsible for obtaining landowner permissions or for access to the Project area. The paleontologist will utilize the same JHA prepared for the archaeological survey. Therefore, no additional efforts are assumed for health and safety during the paleontological survey.

Paleontological Resource Report
Upon completion of the records search, literature review, and field survey, Æ will draft a Paleontological Resource Assessment (PRA) to document the results of the desktop and field efforts and to provide Project-specific recommendations on monitoring or mitigation (if applicable). All paleontological work will be conducted in accordance with the City’s guidelines and will meet the requirements of CEQA. Æ’s draft PRA will be submitted electronically in MS Word format for ease of review; we assume any comments to address will be minimal prior to finalization. Æ will submit our final PRA electronically as a PDF file. No hard copies will be prepared or submitted.
728
APPENDIX B: EXHIBITS

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
47 Cabri
Appalachi
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
APPENDIX B:

EXHIBITS
729

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
48 730

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
49 731
APPENDIX C: PROJECT SCHEDULE

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
50 Cabri
Appalachi
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
G
o
e
t
z
R
d
APPENDIX C:

PROJECT

SCHEDULE
732

CITY OF PERRIS

GOETZ ROAD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT OVER SAN JACINTO RIVER (CIP S160)
51 ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Contract Award 0 days Mon 7/6/26 Mon 7/6/26
2 Project Kick-Off Meeting 0 days Fri 7/10/26 Fri 7/10/26 1FS+5 days 3 Wildlife Agency Coordination 36 mons Mon 7/13/26 Fri 4/13/29 2 4 Task 1 - Project Management 1019 days Mon 7/13/26 Thu 6/6/30 2 5 Phase I - Project Approval & Environmental Documents (PA&ED) 567 days Mon 7/13/26 Tue 9/12/28 6 City to Provide Survey and Preliminary Design CAD Files 5 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 7/17/26 2 7 Task 3 - Survey and Update Base Map 30 days Mon 7/20/26 Fri 8/28/26 6 8 Task 2 - Utility Research and Coordination 540 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/4/28 2 9 Data Compilation/Site Visit 20 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/7/26 2 10 Utility Conflict Mapping/Utility Relocation and Agreements 540 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/4/28 2 11 Utility Potholing 40 days Mon 1/4/27 Fri 2/26/27 44
12 Task 4 - Right of Way Analysis 25 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 2/26/27 45 13 Task 5 - Preliminary Geotechnical Analysis 25 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/14/26 2 14 Task 6 - Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening (VMT) 30 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/21/26 2 15 Task 7 - Environmental Determination 427 days Mon 1/25/27 Tue 9/12/28 16 MSHCP/CEQA Technical Studies & AB52 305 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/24/28 17 Receive conceptual approval of Project Impact area - permanent and Temporary
1 wk Mon 1/25/27 Fri 1/29/27 45
18 MSHCP Consistency Analysis 2 mons Mon 9/13/27 Fri 11/5/27 17,19,20 19 Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys (Survey season March - August) 8 mons Mon 2/1/27 Fri 9/10/27 17 20 Focused Plant Surveys (Survey Season March/April to June/July) 8 mons Mon 2/1/27 Fri 9/10/27 17 21 Crotch's Bumble Bee Surveys (Survey Season March to August/Sept) 10 mons Mon 2/1/27 Fri 11/5/27 17 22 Jurisdictional Delineation 2 mons Mon 2/1/27 Fri 3/26/27 17 23 DBESP Process 5 mons Mon 11/8/27 Fri 3/24/28 18
24 HANS/JPR Process 5 mons Mon 11/8/27 Fri 3/24/28 18,19SS,20SS,23SS,2 25 Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis 8 wks Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/19/27 45 26 Cultural Resources Studies 4 mons Mon 2/1/27 Fri 5/21/27 17 27 AB 52 Tribal Consultation Process 4 mons Mon 5/24/27 Fri 9/10/27 26 28 CEQA Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) 249 days Mon 9/13/27 Thu 8/24/28 2 29 Prepare Screencheck IS/MND 2 mons Mon 9/13/27 Fri 11/5/27 2,13,14,43,25,27 30 City Review Screencheck IS/MND 3 wks Mon 11/8/27 Fri 11/26/27 29 31 Prepare Screencheck 2 IS/MND 14 days Mon 3/27/28 Thu 4/13/28 30,23,24 32 City Review Screencheck 2 IS/MND 4 wks Fri 4/14/28 Thu 5/11/28 31 33 Finalize IS/MND & Prepare for Noticing of MND 1 wk Fri 5/12/28 Thu 5/18/28 32 34 Public Review IS/MND 30 days Fri 6/2/28 Thu 7/13/28 33FS+10 days 35 Prepare Screencheck Final IS/MND, Response to Comments, MMRP 15 days Fri 7/14/28 Thu 8/3/28 34 36 City Review Screencheck Final IS/MND, Response to Comments, MMRP2 wks Fri 8/4/28 Thu 8/17/28 35 37 Prepare and Submit Final IS/MND 1 wk Fri 8/18/28 Thu 8/24/28 36 38 Prepare draft Notice of Determination pending City Council Adoption of MND 3 days Fri 8/18/28 Tue 8/22/28 36 39 Task 8 - Hydrology & Hydraulic Analysis 40 days Mon 7/13/26 Fri 9/4/26 2 46 Task 10 - Community Outreach 40 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 3/19/27 43,44,45 40 Task 9 - Preliminary Design (30% Design) 105 days Mon 8/31/26 Fri 1/22/27 41 Structure Type Selection Report 50 days Mon 8/31/26 Fri 11/6/26 7 42 Preliminary Street & Grading Design (30%) 70 days Mon 8/31/26 Fri 12/4/26 7 43 Preliminary Signing and Striping Design (30%) 20 days Mon 11/9/26 Fri 12/4/26 41 44 Preliminary EMWD Water and Sewer Force Main Design (30%) 20 days Mon 12/7/26 Fri 1/1/27 42 45 City Staff to Review Preliminary Plans 15 days Mon 1/4/27 Fri 1/22/27 44 47 Phase II - Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E), Construction 879 days Mon 1/25/27 Thu 6/6/30 48 Task 1 - Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) 427 days Mon 1/25/27 Tue 9/12/28 45 49 65% PS&E (Plans and Cost Estimate) 120 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 7/9/27 45 50 Geotechnical Borings and Analysis 25 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 2/26/27 51 Street, Drainage, and Grading Improvement Plans 80 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 5/14/27 45 52 Structure Design 80 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 5/14/27 45
53 Signing and Striping Plans 80 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 5/14/27 45 54 Street Light Plans 80 days Mon 1/25/27 Fri 5/14/27 45 55 Technical Specifications 20 days Mon 5/17/27 Fri 6/11/27 54 56 Construction Cost Estimate 15 days Mon 5/17/27 Fri 6/4/27 54 57 City Staff Review of 65% PS&E 20 days Mon 6/14/27 Fri 7/9/27 55 58 95% PS&E (Plans, Specs and Cost Estimate) 80 days Mon 7/12/27 Fri 10/29/27 57 59 95% PS&E Package 50 days Mon 7/12/27 Fri 9/17/27 57
60 Structure Independent Check (95% Plans) 10 days Mon 9/20/27 Fri 10/1/27 59 61 City Review of 95% PS&E 20 days Mon 10/4/27 Fri 10/29/27 60 62 Prepare 100% PS&E 55 days Mon 11/1/27 Fri 1/14/28 61 63 100% PS&E Package 35 days Mon 11/1/27 Fri 12/17/27 61 64 City Review of 100% PS&E 20 days Mon 12/20/27 Fri 1/14/28 63 65 Obtain Approval of PS&E - City Adoption of MND & MSHCP Findings 10 days Wed 8/23/28 Tue 9/5/28 64,38 66 File Notice of Determination 5 days Wed 9/6/28 Tue 9/12/28 65,38 67 Task 2 - Bid and Construction Support 452 days Wed 9/13/28 Thu 6/6/30 68 Pre-Bid Meeting 1 day Wed 9/13/28 Wed 9/13/28 66
69 Response to Bidders' Inquiries 60 days Thu 9/14/28 Wed 12/6/28 68 70 Pre-Construction Meeting 1 day Thu 12/7/28 Thu 12/7/28 69 71 Review Equipment and Materials Submittals 350 days Fri 12/8/28 Thu 4/11/30 70 72 Response to RFIs & Contractor Change Orders 350 days Fri 12/8/28 Thu 4/11/30 70 73 Final Record Drawings 40 days Fri 4/12/30 Thu 6/6/30 72 7/6
7/10
H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1
2027 2028 2029 2030
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External Milestone
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
Goetz Road Bridge Replacement Project (CIP S160)

Page 1 ends

Perris City CouncilSeptember 29, 2026

Perris City Council
September 29, 2026