FY 2025-2026 - Proposed Operating and Capital Improvement Budget — Petaluma City Council, May 5, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

Funded percentage of total project cost: 93%

Start Date: FY 2019/20 – Winter 2019
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding

Project Manager: Diane Ramirez
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-28

FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Electric Vehicle Chargers – City Facilities C11502015

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C11502015
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 340 200 540 150 10 10 710 Administration / Legal 2 2 4 30 6 6 46 Construction Contracts - 3,982 133 94 4,209 Construction Mgmt - 280 10 10 300 Contingency - 819 20 20 859 CIP Overheads 8 5 13 131 2 2 148 TOTAL USES 350$ 207$ 557$ 150$ 5,242$ 181$ 142$ -$ 6,272$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
City Facilities Impact Fee 34 34 17 17 17 85 General Fund 17 17 17
General Fund- Measure U 250 250 260 260 125 895 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant - 121 121 Water Capital 76 76 76
Waste Water Capital 59 59 59
Developer Contributions/ Donations 22 22 22 Steet Maintenance 59 59 59
Undetermined A - 4,938 4,938
TOTAL FUNDS 517$ $ - 517$ 121$ $ 5,215 277$ 142$ $ - $ 6,272 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will install electric vehicle chargers at six city- owned facilities to support the existing and growing need for city -owned electric vehicles as part of the C ity’s ongoing transition to an electric fleet. The chargers are planned for installation at the Police Department,
Corporation Yard, Water Field Office, Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility, Community Center, and City Hall. The charger installed at the Community Center will also be
available for public use.

This initiative aligns with the City's commitment to
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The project has
completed the Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging
Infrastructure Master Plan, which includes conceptual
and engineering designs for EV chargers at these
locations.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 21%

Start Date: FY 2019/20 - Summer 2019
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Diane Ramirez
Department Rep: Drew Halter

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ______________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-29

FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
City Facilities Energy Efficiency Projects New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

City Facilities Energy Efficiency Projects
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 350 350 Administration / Legal - 2 2
Construction Contracts - 4,462 4,462 Construction Mgmt - 150 150
Contingency - 892 892
CIP Overheads - 6 136 142 TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 356$ 5,642$ -$ -$ 5,998$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Interfund Loan 155 155
Undetermined A - 201 5,642 5,843 TOTAL FUNDS $ -$ - $ - $ - 356$ $ 5,642 $ -$ -$ 5 ,998 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
In 2020, Public Works & Utilities staff completed a high-level Facilities Condition Assessment of 46 city-owned buildings.

The assessment identified over $30 million in deferred
maintenance costs and another $22 million in maintenance costs that will be needed in the next 20 years. The City also analyzed the energy use of all city -owned facilities through the City-Wide Facilities Audit & Energy Program
(E11202132) and identified equipment for retrofit to produce energy savings. This project will deliver energy efficiency project(s) scoped and designed as part of that program.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 3%

Start Date: TBD, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-30

FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
City Facilities Fire Alarm System New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

City Facilities Fire Alarm System
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 250 250 Administration / Legal - 1 1
Construction Contracts - 500 500
Construction Mgmt - 20 20
Contingency - 50 50
CIP Overheads - 15 15
TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 250$ 586$ -$ -$ 836$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Undetermined A - 250 586 836 TOTAL FUNDS $$ - - $ - $ - 250$ 586$ $$ - - 836$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
In 2020, staff conducted a comprehensive Facilities
Condition Assessment for 46 city -owned buildings. This assessment unveiled deferred maintenance costs
surpassing $30 million, along with an anticipated $22
million in maintenance expenses over the next two
decades. Recognizing the critical importance of fire safety, especially in public spaces, this project will focus on installing and upgrading fire alarm systems in selected city facilities, prioritizing those with assembly areas.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 0%

Start Date: TBD, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other__________

☐Climate First ☐ Shovel Ready

CIP-31

FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Community Center Interior Repairs New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Community Center Interior Repairs
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 200 200 Administration / Legal - 10 10
Construction Contracts - 1,910 1,910 Construction Mgmt - 50 50
Contingency - 200 200
CIP Overheads - 25 25
TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 200$ 2,195$ -$ -$ 2,395$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Undetermined A - 200 2,195 2,395 TOTAL FUNDS $$ - - -$ -$ 200$ $ 2,195 $$ - -$ 2 ,395 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Community Center Interior Repairs project will rejuvenate the building’s interior, addressing wear and tear from over forty years of community activity and significant damage from water intrusion. Alongside restoring damaged materials, this initiative will also focus on upgrading and/or repairing essential components like flooring, doors, heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) systems, and lighting. Such
renovations are vital to maintain the safety and functionality of a community hub that sees extensive use. This project aligns with the Community Center Exterior Repairs project
(C16201304), ensuring a cohesive approach where external fixes precede interior enhancements . Additionally, energy efficiency initiatives, possibly including a transition from gas to electric, may be integrated, potentially in collaboration with the City-Wide Facilities Audit & Energy Program (E11202132).

Funded percentage of total project cost: 0%

Start Date: TBD, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:

No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-32

FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
City Hall West Wing Improvements New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

City Hall West Wing Improvements
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - - 100 100 Administration / Legal - - 5 5 Construction Contracts - - 500 500 Construction Mgmt - - 50 50 Contingency - - 50 50 CIP Overheads - - 14 14 TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 719$ -$ -$ -$ 719$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Undetermined A - - 719 719 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 719$ $ - $ - $ - 719$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project at City Hall will continue updates and
improvements to the interior spaces. This project will enhance both functionality and aesthetics by renovating finishes in the lobby, updating public restrooms, and addressing necessary access improvements in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Upon completion of the City Hall West Wing Space Remodel & Permit Center project (C11202017).

Funded percentage of total project cost: 0%

Start Date: TBD, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-33

FACILITIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-34

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

PARKS PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 3140.31400
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C14501607
Petaluma Community
Baseball Field- Phase 1
CIP-36
$ 6,734 $ 355 $ 7,089 $ 410 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,499 100% New Petaluma Community
Baseball Field- Phase 2 CIP-37 - - - - - 1,967 1,792 - 3,759 0% New Parks Master Plan CIP-38 - - - - 500 - - - 500 0% C14502114 Lynch Creek Trail/ Crosstown
Connector CIP-41 564 127 691 1,968 439 - - - 3,098 100% C14502317 Kenilworth Park Revitalization
Plan CIP-42 301 19 320 - - 375 8,550 - 9,245 3% E14502024 Marina Dredging CIP-43 1,232 - 1,232 - - - - 8,666 9,898 12% E14402237 Petaluma River Dredging
Program CIP-44 - 25 25 800 - - - 1,350 2,175 100% C14502008 Lucchesi Turf Field
Replacement CIP-45 164 2,115 2,279 467 - - - - 2,746 100% C14402215 Lucchesi Skatepark CIP-46 226 1,868 2,094 1,654 1,102 - - - 4,850 77% New
Swim Center Facility
Assessment and Remodel
Phase (Phase 2)
CIP-47 - 13 13 49 1,191 1,190 - - 2,443 3% C14202319
Prince Park Concession and
Restroom Facility -
Remodel/Repair
CIP-48 6 44 50 - - - 127 - 177 100% New 1st and C Street Fishing
Dock and Community Space CIP-49 - - - - - 50 490 - 540 10% New Senior Services Parking Lot
Reconstruction and Striping CIP-50 - - - - - 222 - - 222 9% TOTAL 9,227$ 4,566$ 13,793$ 5,348$ 3,232$ 3,804$ 10,959$ 10,016$ 47,152$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Parkland Impact Fees 5,761$ 650$ 6,411$ 365$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 6,776$ Donations/Developer
Contributions 214 532 746 - - 50 - - 796 Measure M - Parks 1,232 150 1,382 542 13 - 77 - 2,014 American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) 313 - 313 - - - - - 313 Go Sonoma Transportation
Sales Tax - - - 1,620 - - - - 1,620 Grants 173 216 389 - - - - - 389 SCTA TDA 194 - 194 - - - - - 194 General Fund Reserves - Turf
Replacement 1,296 - 1,296 - - - - - 1,296 General Fund 1,100 - 1,100 - - - - - 1,100 General Fund-Measure U 1,826 575 2,401 150 - - - - 2,551 Transient Occupancy Tax
(TOT) 678 125 803 400 300 300 300 250 2,353 Traffic Impact Fees 360 124 484 348 439 - - - 1,271 Storm Drainage Utility - - - 410 - - - - 410 Undetermined - - - - 2,793 3,774 10,832 8,670 26,069 TOTAL 13,147$ 2,372$ 15,519$ 3,835$ 3,545$ 4,124$ 11,209$ 8,920$ 47,152$ Page
No.
% of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
CIP-35

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Petaluma Community Baseball Field (Phase One) C14501607

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C14501607
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 873 150 1,023 - 1,023 Administration / Legal 33 50 83 - 83 Construction Contracts 5,575 100 5,675 350 6,025 Construction Mgmt 162 5 167 55 222 Contingency 45 45 - 45 CIP Overheads 91 5 96 5 101 TOTAL USES $ 6,734 355$ $ 7,089 410$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,499 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Parkland Impact Fees 5,761 - 5,761 5,761 Donations/Developer Contributions 174 174 174 Measure M - Parks 300 300 300
General Fund-Measure U 154 154 154
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 500 500 500 Traffic Impact Fees 200 200 200
Storm Drainage Utility - 410 410
TOTAL FUNDS $ 7,089 $ - $ 7,089 410$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,499 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project entails the construction of a new baseball field and associated facilities to provide year -round youth and adult programming as well as host local and regional sporting events.

The first phase of this project provide s a regulation -sized baseball field with spectator viewing areas, dugouts, and fencing, as well as increased parking capacity adjacent to the current playing fields. Subsequent baseball field project phases may include the construction of grandstands and spectator seating, field lighting, restroom and concession facilities, and parking lot improvements. Th is phase of t he project has been funded primarily through Parkland Impact Fees, Sonoma
County Measure M - Parks for All initiative, along with significant contributions from the Petaluma Leghorns American Legion Baseball organization. The majority of this phase of the project was completed in FY 2024/25 with the field being actively used starting June 2024. The remaining components of this phase are anticipated to be completed in FY 2025/26.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2015/16 – June 2016
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: Paul Geoghegan
Department Rep: Drew Halter

Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-36

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Petaluma Community Baseball Field (Phase Two) New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Petaluma Community Baseball Field- Phase 2
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 175 175 Administration / Legal - 10 5 15 Construction Contracts - 1,577 1,577 3,154 Construction Mgmt - 40 45 85 Contingency - 150 150 300 CIP Overheads - 15 15 30 TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,967$ 1,792$ -$ 3,759$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
UndeterminedA - 1,967 1,792 3,759 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,967 $ 1,792 $ - $ 3,759 Projected BudgetsA Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

Description and Justification
Phase One of this project (C14501607) included
construction of a new baseball field and associated
facilities, providing year -round opportunities for youth and adult programming while enabling the City to host local and regional sporting events. Phase Two envisions additional enhancements, such as grandstands and spe ctator
seating, field lighting, restroom and concession facilities, and improvements to the parking lot.

The amenities included in Phase Two and the project
timeline are contingent on securing funding sources.

Currently, no funding has been allocated for this phase.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 0%

Start Date: TBD, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-37

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Parks Master Plan New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Parks Master Plan
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 500 500 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - -
Construction Mgmt - -
Contingency - -
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 500$ -$ -$ -$ 500$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Undetermined A - 500 500
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 500$ $ - $ - $ - 500$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will fund a consultant that will conduct a thorough assessment of current park facilities, their
condition, usage patterns, and demographics of the
community to identify gaps and areas for improvement.

The consultant along with staff will be e ngaging residents, community groups, and stakeholders through surveys,
public meetings, workshops, and online platforms to gather input and feedback on park preferences, priorities, and concerns.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 0%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-38

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-39

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Lynch Creek Trail / Crosstown Connector C14502114

CIP-40

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: __________________
Lynch Creek Trail / Crosstown Connector C14502114

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C14502114
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 115 120 235 235 Administration / Legal 1 4 5 10 5 20 Construction Contracts 428 428 1,500 325 2,253 Construction Mgmt 10 10 150 33 193 Contingency - 300 66 366 CIP Overheads 10 3 13 8 10 31 TOTAL USES 564$ 127$ 691$ $ 1,968 439$ $ - $ - $ - $ 3,098 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Donations/Developer Contributions 40 40 40 Go Sonoma Transportation Sales Tax - 1,620 1,620 TFCA 173 173 173
SCTA TDA 194 194 194
Traffic Impact Fees 160 124 284 348 439 1,071 TOTAL FUNDS 567$ 124$ 691$ $ 1,968 439$ $ - $ - $ - $ 3,098 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The 2.5-mile Lynch Creek Trail, which runs from Prince Park to downtown, is the primary crosstown connector for people walking, bicycling, and rolling between Petaluma’s east and west sides. This CIP project has resulted in incremental improvements to the trail surface over the past several years.

Up next, the City will pave the final unpaved section between Edith Street and Payran Street , improve accessibility at the Payran Street trailhead, and repave the section between Lynch Creek and N orth McDowell Boulevard. Future
improvements may include trail lighting and improved access at Copeland Street.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2020/21 – Summer 2020
Estimated Completion: 2026/27
Project Manager: Bjorn Griepenburg
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

CIP-41

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Kenilworth Park Revitalization C14502317

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C14502317
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 288 17 305 362 667 Administration / Legal 7 1 8 7 10 25 Construction Contracts - 6,564 6,564 Construction Mgmt - 656 656
Contingency - 1,312 1,312
CIP Overheads 6 1 7 6 8 21 TOTAL USES 301$ 19$ 320$ -$ -$ 375$ 8,550$ -$ 9,245$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Measure M - Parks 300 300 300
Undetermined A - 395 8,550 8,945 300$ $ - 300$ $ - $ - 395$ $ 8,550 $ - $ 9,245 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Kenilworth Park is located within the recently reacquired Petaluma Fairgrounds, which will now undergo a
comprehensive master planning effort with community input to establish a unified vision for the entire property . With this new planning initiative, any future improvements to Kenilworth Park will be developed in coordination with the broader vision for the Fairgrounds to ensure alignment with community
priorities and a unified approach to the site's redevelopment.

The extensive community input already gathered during
workshops and surveys in 2022, which identified priorities such as upgraded play spaces, improved access, and
enhanced park amenities, will be fully considered as part of the Fairgrounds Master Plan to ensure that past engagement informs future planning efforts.

Potential improvements for Kenilworth Park may include
upgraded recreational and play spaces, interactive public art, new play equipment, improved access and safety, enhanced drainage, tree replacements, and updated park amenities.

Future designs will prioritize sustainability through the use of climate-friendly building materials and features that align with Petaluma's climate action goals.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 3%

Start Date: FY 2022/23 – Summer 2022
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-42

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Marina Dredging E14502024

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

E14502024
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 352 352 662 1,014 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts 864 864 6,670 7,534 Construction Mgmt 7 7 144 151 Contingency - 1,150 1,150
CIP Overheads 9 9 40 49 TOTAL USES 1,232$ -$ 1,232$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,666$ 9,898$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
General Fund 1,100 1,100 1,100
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 128 128 128 Undetermined A - - 8,670 8,670 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,228 $ -1,228$ -$ $ - $ - $ -$ 8,670 $ 9,898 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The primary goal of this project is to restore the full operational water depth of the Petaluma Marina for boating safety, naviga bility, and the functionality of state-leased marina operations. Heavy siltation has significantly impacted the marina, leaving many slips unusable during low -tide cycles and limiting tenant occupancy . Currently, many slips lack adequate water depth during a low-tide cycle to maintain vessel buoyancy. In 2022, a limited phase-one dredging event removed 1,700 cubic yards of material, restor ing navigable access to the Petaluma River for emergency
service vessels as well as increased access to the fuel dock and boat launch area . However, completing full dredging remains a significant challenge due to the high costs of sediment removal and disposal, as well as regulatory and logistical barriers. Staff continues to explore funding opportunities, including grants and partnerships, to address these challenges and advance this project.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 12%

Start Date: FY2019/20
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-43

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Petaluma River Dredging Program E14402237

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

E14402237
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 25 25 100 125 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 800 1,100 1,900 Construction Mgmt - 50 50
Contingency - 100 100
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES $ - 25$ 25$ 800$ $ - $ - $ - $ 1,350 $ 2,175 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
General Fund-Measure U 650 650 650
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 50 125 175 200 300 300 300 250 1,525 TOTAL FUNDS 700$ 125$ 825$ 200$ 300$ 300$ 300$ 250$ 2,175 $ Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Project Start Date: Ongoing
Estimated Completion Date: Ongoing
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
Description and Justification
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( Corps) is responsible for maintaining the federal channel of the Petaluma River, including dredging of the Turning Basin to a depth of 8 feet. However, stagnant federal f unding and rising dredging costs have made shallow draft channels like the Petaluma River, with limited commercial boating traffic, uncompetitive for funding. As a result, Corps-led dredging can occur as infrequently as every 15 years, leaving the river channel and Turning Basin unnavigable for most recreational and commercial vessels. Staff have coordinated with the Corps and the State Coastal Conservancy (SCC) to secure federal funding and supplemental state grant funding. Dependent on funding timelines, dredging is anticipated to occur during the summer of 2025. To mitigate future lapses in the Corps’ maintenance dredging cycle, the C ity proposes funding a dredging project every 6 years, ensuring a minimum 50-foot-wide channel with navigable depth and Turning Basin access. Staff will be engaging with other shallow draft channel stakeholders of the North Bay to leverage regional partnerships . The objective is to develop programs for beneficial re -use of dredge material for wetland and habitat restoration and protection from sea-level rise, as well as to explore funding opportunities to continue to perform maintenance dredging.

CIP-44

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Lucchesi Turf Field Replacement C14502008

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C14502008
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 149 120 269 70 339 Administration / Legal 4 5 9 2 11 Construction Contracts 1 1,700 1,701 170 1,871 Construction Mgmt 3 120 123 60 183 Contingency 150 150 155 305 CIP Overheads 7 20 27 10 37 TOTAL USES 164$ $ 2,115 $ 2,279 467$ $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 2,746 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Measure M - Parks 382 382 343 725 General Fund Reserves - Turf Replacement 1,296 - 1,296 1,296 General Fund-Measure U 575 575 150 725 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,678 575$ $ 2,253 493$ $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 2,746 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2019/20 - Fall 2019
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ____________
Description and Justification
The all-weather synthetic multi-use field at Lucchesi Park was installed in 2000 to accommodate the growing demand for year-round youth sports and recreation. Since 2000, the field has remained one of the most active athletic fields in Petaluma, used by youth and adult soccer and lacrosse programs,
specialty camps, adult programs, and off -season clinics. The turf field was last replaced in 2009 and has surpassed its expected service life. The new installation will include improved drainage systems, shock-absorption design
elements, and the replacement of the existing crumb rubber infill with a natural infill.

CIP-45

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Lucchesi Skatepark C14402215

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C14402215
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 213 125 338 70 408 Administration / Legal 7 2 9 5 14 Construction Contracts 1,475 1,475 858 1,102 3,435 Construction Mgmt 1 46 47 196 243 Contingency 200 200 500 700 CIP Overheads 5 20 25 25 50 TOTAL USES 226$ 1,868$ 2,094$ 1,654$ 1,102$ -$ -$ -$ 4,850$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Parkland Impact Fees 650 650 365 1,015 Donations- Virginia Craig Estate Trust 532 532 532 Measure M - Parks 150 150 300 150 450 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) 313 313 313 Prop 68 216 216 216
General Fund-Measure U 1,022 1,022 1,022
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - 200 200 UndeterminedA - - 1,102 1,102 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,485 $ 1,548 $ 3,033 715$ $ 1,102 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,850 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
In 2022, the City partnered with Grindline Skateparks,
Inc. to engage the community in discussions about
upgrading the Petaluma Skate park or focus
investments on a new skatepark. Significant community
input strongly favored constructing a new skatepark at Lucchesi Park. Through m ultiple community meetings
and workshops , a concept plan for a 23,000-square-
foot skatepark, located in the grassy area between the
tennis courts and soccer field near Novak Drive , was
developed and adopted by City Council in October
2023. Restroom upgrades and lighting were also added
to the project , as the design pro gressed. Construction of the skatepark is funded through Sonoma County
Measure M—Parks for All, American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA), a generous donation, parkland fees, Prop 68
grant funds, and the general fund. Restroom upgrades
will be made once funding has been identified and
secured.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 77%

Start Date: FY 2022/23 – Winter 2022
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27, Pending Funding
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other:

CIP-46

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Swim Center Facility Improvements (Phase Two) New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Swim Center Facility Assessment and Remodel
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 12 12 45 57 Administration / Legal - 1 1 Construction Contracts - 1,000 1,000 2,000 Construction Mgmt - 75 75 150 Contingency - 100 100 200 CIP Overheads 1 1 4 15 15 35 TOTAL USES -$ 13$ 13$ 49$ 1,191$ 1,190$ -$ -$ 2,443$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Measure M - Parks - 49 13 62 Undetermined A - 1,191 1,190 2,381 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - 49$ $ 1,204 $ 1,190 $ - $ - $ 2,443 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project represents Phase Two of a comprehensive
effort to upgrade the Petaluma Swim Center, following the completion of the Swim Center Pool Replastering project (C14502320). While Phase One focused on critical pool
resurfacing and safety upgrades, Phase Two will evaluate and modernize the aging facility with potential elements including updates to locker rooms, showers, and bathroom facilities to improve accessibility, functionality, and overall user experience.

The initial assessment will review access pathways to the pools and facilities and assist in designing new floor plans to bring the facilities up to current standards. Design costs will be funded by Sonoma County Measure M —Parks for
All initiative funds. Once the assessment is complete and the scope of work is fully defined, staff will explore funding options for the construction phase to bring these facility improvements to completion.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 3%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28, Pending Funding
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-47

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Prince Park Concession and Restroom Facility Remodel/Repair C14202319

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C14202319
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 6 44 50 10 60 Administration / Legal - 2 2 Construction Contracts - 90 90 Construction Mgmt - 9 9
Contingency - 14 14
CIP Overheads - 2 2
TOTAL USES $ 6 44$ 50$ $ - $ - $ - 127$ $ - 177$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Measure M - Parks 100 100 77 177 TOTAL FUNDS 100$ $ - 100$ $ - $ - $ - 77$ $ - 177$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
For decades, t he Prince Park concession building, in
partnership with a local operator, has provided food and beverage services to thousands of youth and adult sports participants and their families during the spring and summer months. To ensure the facility continues to offer safe
amenities, a comprehensive review will be conducted to ensure the facility conforms with the guidelines and
recommendations set by the Sonoma County Health
Department. Pending results of the review, the facility is slated for a series of essential improvements and renovations.

Anticipated upgrades will likely include areas such as water heating, electrical systems, plumbing, and structural and exterior work. This project will be fu nded by Sonoma County Measure M—Parks for All initiative funds.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Project Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion Date: FY 2028/29
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _________________
CIP-48

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1st and C Street Fishing Dock and Community Space New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

1st and C Street Fishing Dock and Community Space
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 50 50 Administration / Legal - 4 4
Construction Contracts - 400 400
Construction Mgmt - 20 20
Contingency - 60 60
CIP Overheads - 6 6
TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50$ 490$ -$ 540$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Donations/Developer Contributions - 50 50 Undetermined A - 490 490
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 50$ 490$ $ - 540$ Projected Budgets
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

Description and Justification
This project aims to enhance public access to the
downtown Turning Basin . As part of the River
Access and Enhancement Plan, a small
community space and fishing dock will be installed
at the end of C Street where it meets the west bank
of the Petaluma River. This project will replicate
the historic fishing dock that was once located at
this site and add a small park -like area with
benches and landscaping to enhance this
waterfront access location. The design phase is
largely funded by a developer contribution , with
construction to follow as additional funding is
secured.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 10%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-49

PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Senior Services Parking Lot Reconstruction & Striping New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Senior Services Parking Lot Reconstruction and Striping USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - - 20 20 Administration / Legal - - 1 1 Construction Contracts - 160 160
Construction Mgmt - 20 20
Contingency - 20 20
CIP Overheads - - 1 1 TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 222$ -$ -$ 222$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Undetermined A - 222 222
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 222$ $ - $ - 222$ Projected Budgets
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

Description and Justification
The Senior Services Parking Lot Reconstruction
and Striping project aims to improve safety,
accessibility, and usability at one of the city’s most
heavily utilized community spaces. This project
involves repairing and replac ing deteriorated
asphalt from the Novak Circle round -about
entrance through the Senior Café area, and the
Senior Services parking lot up to the Public Works
& Utilities Water Field Office . Key upgrades
include improving drainage systems, enhanc ing
ADA-compliant parking spaces, and updating the
striping layout to accommodate expanding
programs and better meet community needs.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 0%

Start Date: TBD, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Drew Halter
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-50

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 3160.31600
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) Page No FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C16102433
Petaluma North SMART
Station Access
Improvements
CIP-53 12 833 845 1,500 1,579 - - - 3,924 100% C16501602 Downtown Pedestrian ADA
Improvements CIP-54 1,164 358 1,522 201 - - - - 1,723 100% C16502430 Downtown Public Restroom
& Beautification CIP-55 6 99 105 186 189 312 - - 792 37% C16102536 Safe Streets Quick Builds CIP-56 - 873 873 1,470 2,022 247 247 247 5,106 64% New Crosswalk and Signal
Improvements CIP-57 - - - - 1,788 - - - 1,788 100% New
SMART Pathway Extension:

Lakeville Street to N Water
Street
CIP-58 - - - - 127 685 - - 812 33% C16102032 Pedestrian Improvements
Citywide CIP-59 271 174 445 544 221 221 - - 1,431 100% New
Corona Road
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Crosstown Connector
CIP-60 - - - - 280 56 56 56 448 100% C16401824 Caulfield Bridge Crosstown
Connector CIP-61 1,220 635 1,855 2,734 2,734 45,575 45,575 - 98,473 38% C16402252 Pedestrian Bridge
Renovations CIP-62 10 113 123 428 3,310 1,408 1,408 - 6,677 34% C16101519 Petaluma River Trail – US-
101 and Rail Undercrossings CIP-63 41 8 49 - 430 6,615 - - 7,094 63% New Electric Utility
Undergrounding CIP-64 - - - - 1,085 1,257 - - 2,342 93% C16401925 Citywide Bridge Repair CIP-67 10 - 10 - 405 2,436 704 - 3,555 11% E16402353 Public Works Facilities Site
Analysis CIP-68 - - - - 232 295 - - 527 100% C16502022 Trestle Rehabilitation CIP-69 305 600 905 75 8,430 4,230 - - 13,640 7% C16102435 Pavement Restoration -
Howard Street CIP-72 5 416 421 1,838 - - - - 2,259 100% c16102434 Pavement Restoration -
Rainier Avenue CIP-73 4 440 444 2,190 - - - - 2,634 100% C16102251 Pavement Restoration - D
Street CIP-74 135 65 200 40 40 1,800 - - 2,080 13% New Pavement Restoration -
Caulfield Lane CIP-75 - 172 172 1,409 2,648 - - - 4,229 100% C16102537 Pavement Restoration - St.

Francis Drive CIP-76 - 70 70 - 1,071 2,145 - - 3,286 100% New FY25/26 Pavement
Preventative Maintenance CIP-77 - - - 715 - - - - 715 100% New FY26/27 Pavement
Restoration & Maintenance CIP-78 - - - - 10,725 - - - 10,725 100% New FY27/28 Pavement
Restoration & Maintenance CIP-79 - - - - - 9,043 - - 9,043 100% New FY28/29 Pavement
Restoration & Maintenance CIP-80 - - - - - - 9,676 - 9,676 100% New FY29/30 Pavement
Restoration & Maintenance CIP-81 - - - - - - - 8,300 8,300 100% TOTAL $ 3,183 $ 4,856 $ 8,039 $ 13,330 $ 37,316 $ 76,325 $ 57,666 $ 8,603 $ 2 01,279 Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
% of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Estimate
FY 24-25
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
CIP-51

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 3160.31600
SOURCES (dollars in $000)
FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 154$ 1,574$ 1,728$ 3,505$ 5,692$ 33,596$ 1,124$ 506$ 46,151$ Street Maintenance /
Highway Users Tax 294 200 494 962 1,621 340 38 38 3,493 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,293 121 1,414 - - - - - 1,414 Go Sonoma Transportation Sales Tax - - - 1,234 1,130 2,000 - - 4,364 General Fund 871 - 871 - - - - - 871 General Fund- Measure U 450 - 450 - - - - - 450 Infrastructure Bond- Measure U Sales Tax 9 571 580 3,388 582 - - - 4,550 Future Bond Issue - - - - 10,606 10,743 9,200 7,892 38,441 Public Works Grants - 373 373 2,706 3,950 83 - - 7,112 Petaluma Tourism Improvement District - - - 295 - - - - 295 Developer Contributions 2,844 - 2,844 - - - - - 2,844 PGE On-Bill Financing / Credits - - - - 1,185 1,086 - - 2,271 Measure M Parks 38 - 38 - - - - - 38 Water Capital 9 - 9 - 115 156 - - 280 Waste Water Capital 27 - 27 - 101 139 - - 267 Certified Access Specialist CASP 95 - 95 - - - - - 95 Undetermined - - - - 12,510 28,362 47,304 167 88,343 TOTAL $ 6,084 $ 2,839 $ 8,923 $ 12,090 $ 37,492 $ 76,505 $ 57,666 $ 8,603 $ 2 01,279 Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Total
Project
Estimate
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26

PROJECTED
CIP-52

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Petaluma North SMART Station Access Improvements C16102433

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16102433
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 80 80 Administration / Legal 2 2 2
Construction Contracts 618 618 1,380 1,400 3,398 Construction Mgmt 9 15 24 40 40 104 Contingency 200 200 139 339
CIP Overheads 1 1 1
TOTAL USES 12$ 833$ 845$ $ 1,500 $ 1,579 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,924 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 562 562 44 79 685 Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC) 283 283 1,456 1,500 3,239 TOTAL $ - 845$ 845$ $ 1,500 $ 1,579 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,924 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This initiative expands on the North McDowell Boulevard Complete Streets project (CIP #C16102147) between the
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit (SMART) tracks on Corona Road and North McDowell Blvd. In partnership with SMART and developer Danco Communities, the City secured the
Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (AHSC)
grant to bolster bike and pedestrian infrastructure along McDowell Boulevard.

This project will introduce a landscaped multipurpose trail between the SMART tracks and Corona Road, enhanced by
new streetlights. Additionally, landscaped facilities will be added along both sides of Corona Road , connecting North McDowell Boulevard to the new Petaluma North SMART
station and trail. The final paving section on North McDowell Boulevard near the SMART tracks will also be performed as part of this project.

Ultimately, this project aims to bridge existing gaps in bike and pedestrian infrastructure, ensuring safe and
comprehensive connectivity in and around the new Petaluma North SMART station area.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager Jeff Stutsman
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-53

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Downtown Pedestrian ADA Improvements C16501602

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16501602
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 137 15 152 152 Administration / Legal 2 2 2
Construction Contracts 911 300 1,211 169 1,380 Construction Mgmt 93 13 106 10 116 Contingency 27 27 20 47
CIP Overheads 21 3 24 2 26 TOTAL USES 1,164$ 358$ 1,522$ 201$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,723$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax 57 57 250 307 Transient Occupancy Tax 1,180 121 1,301 1,301 Waste Water Capital 20 20 20
Certified Access Specialist CASP 95 95 95 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,352 121$ $ 1,473 250$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,723 Projected Budgets
Project Manager: Kent Carothers
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
Description and Justification
To enhance safety, walkability, and accessibility in and around downtown Petaluma, the City is actively
upgrading curb ramps, sidewalks, and other pedestrian
areas to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) standards. These upgrades are designed to
remove barriers, create smoother pathways, and ensure
compliance with modern accessibility requirements.

Wherever possible, the City is integrating ADA upgrades with broader traffic calming and safety enhancement
measures, such as crosswalks and sidewalk bulb -outs.

This effort aims to foster a more inclusive, welcoming, and pedestrian-friendly downtown environment while
prioritizing public safety and accessibility.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2015/16
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-54

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Downtown Public Restroom & Beautification C16502430

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16502430
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 5 20 25 6 50 81 Administration / Legal 2 2 1 5 8 Construction Contracts 57 57 137 143 200 537 Construction Mgmt - 10 7 24 41 Contingency 15 15 27 29 36 107 CIP Overheads 1 5 6 5 5 2 18 TOTAL USES 6$ 99$ 105$ 186$ 189$ 312$ -$ -$ 792$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Petaluma Tourism Improvement District 295 295 Undetermined A - - 497 497 TOTAL $ - $ - $ - 295$ $ - 497$ $ - $ - 792$ Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 37%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Paige Bullock
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

Description and Justification
Petaluma’s Historic Downtown Business District is a special part of our community, serving as a gathering space, an economic hub, and an important reminder of our history.

This project will install a prefabricated public restroom in the City’s downtown area to provide a clean, safe, and
sustainable public restroom solution for the community. The public restroom is anticipated to be installed in early 2026.

Along with the public restroom, t his project will also likely include upgrades to trash receptacles, street furniture, bike racks, tree wells and trees, pedestrian level streetlamps, etc., to allow for a cleaner, safer, more walkable Downtown.

While some of these project elements are underway, staff will be working with the Downtown Association to prioritize the full scope of improvements. This project will create a welcoming physical environment that encourages people to shop, dine, play, and do business downtown through infrastructure
improvements that support the City’s and the Downtown
Association’s tourism and economic development goals.

CIP-55

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Safe Streets Quick Builds C16102536

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16102536
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 25 25 55 87 10 10 10 197 Administration / Legal 2 2 5 5 2 2 2 18 Construction Contracts 750 750 1,250 1,750 200 200 200 4,350 Construction Mgmt 30 30 100 100 10 10 10 260 Contingency 60 60 50 60 20 20 20 230 CIP Overheads 6 6 10 20 5 5 5 51 TOTAL USES -$ 873$ 873$ 1,470$ 2,022$ 247$ 247$ 247$ 5,106$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 333 333 220 662 80 80 80 1,455 General Fund- Measure U 450 450 450
Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) 90 90 90 USDOT Safe Streets & Roads for all (SS4A) - 1,250 1,250 Undetermined A - 1,360 167 167 167 1,861 TOTAL 450$ 423$ 873$ $ 1,470 $ 2,022 247$ 247$ 247$ 5,106 $ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This multi-year, citywide initiative aims to swiftly implement safe street enhancements, supporting the City's goal of achieving zero severe injuries and traffic -related fatalities by 2030, commonly referred to as "Vision Zero." Additionally, the project seeks to promote walking and biking as preferred modes of transportation.

Efforts in FY 2025/26 will focus primarily around the City's 16 public K -12 schools , addressing improvements identified through the Safe Routes to School Task Force, which
completed traffic safety audits in 2025 . Ely Boulevard South was also identified through the Safe Streets Nomination Program as a top priority for FY 2025/26 based on collision history and proximately to schools.

Funding for these projects will be supported by Measure U general funds with additional federal grant support via U.S.

Department of Transportation ’s Safe Streets and Roads for All.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 64%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Bjorn Griepenburg
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-56

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Crosswalk and Signal Improvements New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Crosswalk and Signal Improvements
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 30 30 Administration / Legal - 5 5 Construction Contracts - 1,503 1,503 Construction Mgmt - 75 75
Contingency - 150 150
CIP Overheads - 25 25
TOTAL USES -$ $ - -$ $ -1,788$ $ - $ -$ - 1,788$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 324 324 Public Works Grants - 1,464 1,464
TOTAL FUNDS -$ $ - -$ $ -1,788$ $ - $ -$ - 1,788$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Crosswalk and Signal Improvements project will
improve safety and accessibility at 38 intersections
throughout Petaluma in support of the City’s goal to
eliminate severe and fatal traffic collisions by 2030.
35 signalized intersections will be modernized with
new signal hardware that improve visibility to drivers, as well as accessibility upgrades for pedestrians.

Two exist ing crosswalks on Sonoma Mountain
Parkway at Monroe and E. Madison Streets will be
enhanced with median refuge islands, and a new
crosswalk serving Lynch Creek Trail will be added
across Sonoma Mountain Parkway. This project is
funded by the Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement
Program, a competitive statewide grant.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-57

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SMART Pathway Extension: Lakeville Street to N Water Street New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

SMART Pathway Extension: Lakeville Street to N Water Street USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 100 100 Administration / Legal - 20 20 40 Construction Contracts - 500 500
Construction Mgmt - 50 50
Contingency - 100 100
CIP Overheads - 7 15 22 TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 127$ 685$ -$ -$ 812$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 42 224 266 Undetermined A - 85 461 546 TOTAL FUNDS -$ $ - -$ $ -127$ 685$ $ -$ - 812$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will extend the SMART Pathway —an
envisioned 71-mile route running alongside SMART’s
rail line between Larkspur and Cloverdale —roughly
500’ south from its current terminus at Lakeville
Street to the intersection of North Water Street and
Oak St reet, allowing people to travel between the
SMART Pathway and downtown without having to
walk or bike on busy nearby streets. The pathway will
provide a short, but critical extension to a 4.5 -mile
segment of the SMART Pathway that currently runs
from Lakev ille Street to Penngrove. In addition to
connecting Sonoma and Marin Counties, the SMART
Pathway is considered the southern portion of the
Great Redwood Trail, an envisioned 307 -mile route
along California’s North Coast linking the San
Francisco and Humbol dt Bays. This project will be
constructed within SMART’s right -of-way and in
partnership with SMART. Funding sources are
undetermined, though it is expected to be competitive
for grant funding given its location and benefits

Funded percentage of total project cost: 33%

Start Date: FY 2026/27, Pending Funding
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-58

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pedestrian Improvements Citywide C16102032

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16102032
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 22 20 42 25 20 20 107 Administration / Legal 1 1 1 2 2 6 Construction Contracts 242 150 392 500 158 158 1,208 Construction Mgmt 2 2 4 10 18 18 50 Contingency - 20 20 40
CIP Overheads 4 2 6 8 3 3 20 TOTAL USES 271$ 174$ 445$ 544$ 221$ 221$ -$ -$ 1,431$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 135 174 309 160 469 Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax 100 100 603 221 924 Measure M Parks 38 38 38
TOTAL FUNDS 273$ 174$ 447$ 160$ 603$ 221$$ -$ -1,431$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This Citywide program focuses on improving pedestrian safety and accessibility through street, sidewalk, and multi-use trail upgrades. Priority will be given to areas that lack Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant curb ramps, particularly in locations not included in upcoming paving projects, as paving activities require intersections and crosswalks to be brought into ADA compliance.

Improvements generally include curb ramp installation, as well as the installation of any related crosswalk striping and signage, ensuring safer and more accessible routes for all users.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2020/21
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Kent Carothers
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-59

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Corona Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Crosstown Connector New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Corona Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Crosstown Connector
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 250 50 50 50 400 Administration / Legal - 10 2 2 2 16 Construction Contracts - -
Construction Mgmt - -
Contingency - -
CIP Overheads - 20 4 4 4 32 TOTAL USES -$ $ - -$ $ -280$ 56$ 56$ 56$ 448$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 92 18 18 18 146 Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax - 188 38 38 38 302 TOTAL FUNDS -$ $ - - $ - $ 280$ 56$ 56$ 56$ 448$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will widen and reconfigure Corona Road, from Petaluma Boulevard North to North McDowell Boulevard,
to provide bicycle and pedestrian accommodations where
none currently exist. These improvements align with the City’s broader efforts to make all crosstown connectors safe and accessible for all modes of travel. The project will be closely coordinated with Caltrans’ planned bridge railing replacement on the Highway 101 overcrossing, scheduled
for FY30/31 as part of the State Highway Operation and
Protection Program (SHOPP). Design efforts in the coming years will focus on ensuring alignment with Caltrans’
schedule and incorporating active transportation facilities into the project scope. By addressing a critical gap in the City’s active transportation network, this project will enhance connectivity, promote alternative modes of travel, and improve safety for all users. These upgrades will
support the City’s goals for sustainable and equita ble infrastructure.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2030/2031
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-60

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Caulfield Bridge Crosstown Connector C16401824

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16401824
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1,177 480 1,657 2,704 2,704 7,065 Administration / Legal 8 8 10 10 25 25 78 Construction Contracts 7 137 144 35,000 35,000 70,144 Construction Mgmt 19 19 3,500 3,500 7,019 Contingency - 7,000 7,000 14,000 CIP Overheads 17 10 27 20 20 50 50 167 TOTAL USES 1,220$ 635$ 1,855$ 2,734$ 2,734$ 45,575$ 45,575$ -$ 98,473$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 1,795 2,734 30,522 35,051 Developer Contributions 2,794 2,794 2,794
Undetermined A - 15,053 45,575 60,628 TOTAL FUNDS $ 2,794 $ -2,794$ $ 1,795 $ 2,734$$ 44 55,,557755 $ -$ 9 8,473 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Caulfield Bridge Crosstown Connector project aims
to bridge southeast and southwest Petaluma with a new
500-foot drawbridge over the Petaluma River. This
bridge will offer a direct connection between Crystal
Lane at Petaluma Boulevard South and Caulfield Lane
at Bautista Way, easing congestion on existing
crosstown connectors at D Street and Washington
Street as well as enhancing emergency response times.

Additionally, the project includes a Caulfield Lane
extension and key intersection improvements at Hopper
Street to safely and efficiently accommodate people
walking, bicycling, and driving between the bridge and
Lakeville Highway.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 38%

Start Date: FY 2017/18
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: Bjorn Griepenburg
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

A Undetermined sources could utilize future Impact fees based on the Impact Fee Nexus study. Other sources such as future grants, fed/state programs or donations could also be utilized. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☒ Other: TBD pending feasibility of remote bridge
operations
CIP-61

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pedestrian Bridge Renovations C16402252

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16402252
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 9 108 117 419 500 1,036 Administration / Legal 2 2 3 4 3 3 15 Construction Contracts - 1,861 930 930 3,721 Construction Mgmt - 372 186 186 744 Contingency - 558 279 279 1,116 CIP Overheads 1 3 4 6 15 10 10 45 TOTAL USES 10$ 113$ 123$ 428$ 3,310$ 1,408$ 1,408$ -$ 6,677$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 4 113 117 428 681 412 550 2,188 Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax 6 6 6 PGE On-Bill Financing / Credits - 100 100 Undetermined - 2,529 996 858 4,383 TOTAL FUNDS 10$ 113$ 123$ 428$ $ 3,310 $ 1,408 $ 1,408 $ -$ 6,677 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 34%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29, Pending Funding
Description and Justification
Petaluma's pedestrian bridges play a significant role in our community's connectivity. After a thorough
assessment in FY 2022/23 (CIP #E16402238), several
recommended improvements were outlined to enhance
the bridges' safety and functionality. These
enhancements include: 1) upgrading accessibility to
meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards; 2) addressing safety and structural elements; and 3)
establishing a plan for regular maintenance of these
unique wood and steel structures.

The bridges included in this project are scoped into three groups: 1) Balshaw Bridge at the Turning Basin ;
2) Alman Marsh and Shollenberger Bridges ; and
3) Remaining bridges along the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail
Transit ( SMART) pathway, Washington Creek, Lynch
Creek, Casella Way, and Corona Creek.

Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-62

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Petaluma River Trail – US-101 and Rail Undercrossings C16101519

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16101519
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 37 6 43 360 403 Administration / Legal 1 1 15 15 31 Construction Contracts - 5,000 5,000 Construction Mgmt 2 2 500 502 Contingency - 36 1,000 1,036 CIP Overheads 2 1 3 19 100 122 TOTAL USES 41$ 8$ 49$ -$ 430$ 6,615$ -$ -$ 7,094$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 430 1,895 2,325 Go Sonoma Transportation Sales Tax - 2,000 2,000 Caltrans earmark repurposing via SCTA - 83 83 Developer Contributions 50 50 50
Undetermined A - 2,636 2,636
TOTAL FUNDS 50$ $ - 50$ $ - 430$ $ 6,614 $ - $ - $ 7,094 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Petaluma River Trail – US-101 and Rail
Undercrossings project is a planned 0.5-mile multi-use trail between the Petaluma Marina and an existing section of
River Trail that terminates at Bautista and Soto Way in the Riverfront neighborhood. This trail would offer a car -free alternative to the busy US-101 undercrossing on Lakeville Highway and connect people traveling by foot and bike
with the waterfront while overcoming several major
barriers to active transportation , including the US-101, Lakeville Highway, and the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail
Transit ( SMART) tracks. Habitat restoration and tree
plantings will be included in the project scope.

The project is partially funded by Measure M, Sonoma
County’s 1/4-cent transportation sales tax. The City has secured funding for planning and environmental review
and is actively pursuing grants and partnerships to secure the funding needed to support design and construction
phases.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 63%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-63

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Electric Utility Undergrounding New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Electric Utility Undergrounding
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 55 56 111 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 1,000 1,171 2,171 Construction Mgmt - 30 30 60 Contingency - -
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,085$ 1,257$ -$ -$ 2,342$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
PGE On-Bill Financing / Credits - 1,085 1,086 2,171 Undetermined A - 171 171
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 1,085 $ 1,257 $ - $ -$ 2,342 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 93%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: TBD
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

Description and Justification
The Underground District (Rule 20A) projects focus on
enhancing safety and aesthetics by relocating overhead utility lines, their supporting poles, and individual property service drops underground. Per the California Public Utility
Commission's Rule 20A, PG&E was mandated to allocate
funds for communities to transition existing overhead utilities underground. However, this funding ended in 2023, leaving cities to rely on previously accumulated credits for associated work. The current approved project for these credits is Bodega Avenue Phase Two, which represents only a small
fraction of the total project cost. Given the funding gap, the City is exploring alternative options with PG&E, including potentially reallocating funds to an East D Street
undergrounding project , where credits could cover the total project cost. Funds allocated during this program are set to expire on June 8, 2025, if not allocated to a PG&E Rule20A approved “Active” project. All remaining Rule 20A credits will expire on December 31, 2033, regardless of project status.

CIP-64

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-65

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Citywide Bridge Map

CIP-66

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Citywide Bridge Repairs C16401925

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16401925
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 10 10 393 403 Administration / Legal - 5 3 2 10 Construction Contracts - 1,882 464 2,346 Construction Mgmt - 216 93 309 Contingency - 325 139 464 CIP Overheads - 7 10 6 23 TOTAL USES 10$ -$ 10$ -$ 405$ 2,436$ 704$ -$ 3,555$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax 11 11 298 81 390 Undetermined A - 106 2,355 704 3,165 TOTAL FUNDS 11$ $ - 11$ $ - 404$ $ 2,436 704$ $ - $ 3,555 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 11%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29, Pending Funding
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Description and Justification
Petaluma’s 11 vehicle bridges serve the important purpose of safely connecting us to the locations and people we care about. Caltrans performs biannual inspections of these
bridges to ensure they are safe, structurally sound, and in good working order. While no major structural repairs are currently needed, inspection reports indicate that surface treatments, such as sealing bridge concrete and deck ing, are needed to preserve some of the bridge. Initial work will focus on design work to allow the City to seek grant
funding through the Caltrans Highway Bridge Program
(HBP), for construction . This grant funding requires a

11.5% local match.

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _________________
CIP-67

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Public Works Facilities Site Analysis E16402353

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

E16402353
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 200 253 453 Administration / Legal - 5 15 20 Construction Contracts - -
Construction Mgmt - -
Contingency - 15 15 30 CIP Overheads - 12 12 24 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - 232$ 295$ $ - $ - 527$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 9 9 115 156 280 Waste Water Capital 7 7 101 139 247 TOTAL FUNDS 16$ $ - 16$ $ - 216$ 295$ $ - $ - 527$ Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
Description and Justification
The Public Works Facilities Site Analysis project aims to strategically evaluate how best to utilize existing
Corporation Yard space and develop new spaces to
support the diverse needs of the various City
departments. The analysis will include a needs
assessment in coordination with the various users of the future site. The existing facility will continue to evolve with planned utility improvements to the Primary Influent Pump Station (PIPS), removal of decommissioned
structures, and roadway alignment for the Caufield Lane extension.

The initial focus will be to optimize the Corporation Yard use for both City operations and site partners , which
include animal services and the Mary Isaak Center
(COTS). The analysis will then expand to consider other existing sites and potential new locations to address the City’s broader operational needs.

CIP-68

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Trestle Rehabilitation C16502022

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16502022
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 298 600 898 75 - - 973 Administration / Legal 1 1 1 Construction Contracts - 7,000 3,500 10,500 Construction Mgmt - 560 280 840 Contingency - 840 420 1,260
CIP Overheads 6 6 30 30 66 TOTAL USES 305$ 600$ 905$ 75$ 8,430$ 4,230$ -$ -$ 13,640$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Transient Occupancy Tax 113 113 113 General Fund 871 871 871
Undetermined A - - 8,430 4,226 12,656 TOTAL FUNDS 984$ $ - 984$ $ - $ 8,430 $ 4 ,226 $ - $ - $ 13,640 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 7%

Start Date: FY 2020/21
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Funding
Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Paul Kaushal
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Description and Justification
Constructed in 1922, the Petaluma trestle lines the southwest Bank of the Petaluma River Turning Basin and once served as a spur line of the Petaluma and Santa Rosa Railroad. It later offered a promenade and viewing platform for the annual lighted boat parade and other River activities.

While significant hurdles exist, the vision is to transform the structure into a prized, iconic riverfront gathering place and active transportation hub. Major milestones necessary before construction can commence include: 1) alternatives analysis, 2) environmental assessment, 3) determining ownership/
acquisition models, 4) finalizing design and bidding
documents, and 5) securing funding for construction. Due to the numerous project constraints, this is both a complex and multi-year project.

In 2013, the California Coastal Commission provided a grant to help the City develop plans for rehabilitating the Trestle. The estimated construction costs at the time exceeded available funding resources and the project was placed on hold. With continued support from the City Council and the community, the project is being revisited and the design, scope, and cost estimates are being updated as part of this project. Staff continue to explore all potential grant opportunities.

Completion is based on funding.

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☒ Other: Unknown at this time
CIP-69

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-70

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Pavement Restoration & Reconstruction 5-Year Plan

Please visit the City’s website for additional information on the 5-year pavement program and interactive map located at https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/ CIP-71

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pavement Restoration – Howard Street C16102435

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16102435
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 3 60 63 63 Administration / Legal 2 4 6 6 Construction Contracts 240 240 1,440 1,680 Construction Mgmt 20 20 30 50 Contingency 90 90 360 450 CIP Overheads 2 2 8 10 TOTAL USES $ 5 416$ 421$ $ 1,838 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,259 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 75 75 265 340 Infrastructure Bond- Measure U Sales Tax 5 341 346 1,573 1,919 TOTAL $ 5 416$ 421$ $ 1,838 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,259 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26

Description and Justification
This project is part of the City’s current 5-Year Paving Plan (No. 2024-140 N.C.S.) and involves the reconstruction of Howard Street between A Street and West Street.

Going beyond basic repaving, this project will incorporate “Complete Streets” improvements with Vision Zero principles to enhance safety and accessibility for people walking, bicycling, rolling, and driving . These efforts align with the City’s commitment to reduc ing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation while striving to eliminate sever and fatal traffic collisions.

This project will be closely coordinated with planned water main replacement (C67502326) and sewer main replacement (C66402348) capital improvement projects.

For m ore information on the 5-Year Paving Plan, visit :
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-72

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pavement Restoration – Rainier Avenue C16102434

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

c16102434
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 4 82 86 86 Administration / Legal 3 3 3
Construction Contracts 275 275 1,975 2,250 Construction Mgmt 20 20 50 70 Contingency 50 50 150 200 CIP Overheads 10 10 15 25 TOTAL USES $ 4 440$ 444$ $ 2,190 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,634 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 10 10 402 412 Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax 200 200 688 888 Infrastructure Bond- Measure U Sales Tax 4 230 234 1,100 1,334 TOTAL $ 4 440$ 444$ $ 2,190 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,634 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26

Description and Justification
This project is part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.) and involves the reconstruction of Rainier Avenue between N McDowell Boulevard and Sonoma
Mountain Parkway.

Going beyond basic repaving, this project will incorporate “Complete Streets” improvements with Vision Zero principles to enhance safety and accessibility for people walking, bicycling, rolling, and driving. These efforts align with the City’s commitment to reduc ing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation while striving to eliminate sever and fatal traffic collisions.

This project will be closely coordinated with planned water services replacement (C67502536) and urban recycled water expansion (C66402554) capital improvement projects.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: George Howard
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-73

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pavement Restoration - D Street C16102251

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16102251
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 120 40 160 40 200 Administration / Legal 5 5 5 20 30 Construction Contracts 12 12 1,420 1,432 Construction Mgmt - 15 20 35 Contingency - 300 300
CIP Overheads 3 20 23 20 40 83 TOTAL USES 135$ 65$ 200$ 40$ 40$ 1,800$ -$ -$ 2,080$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 15 65 80 16 40 136 Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax 120 120 24 144 Undetermined A - 1,800 1,800
TOTAL FUNDS 135$ 65$ 200$ 40$ 40$ $ 1,800 $ - $ -$ 2,080 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 13%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28, Pending Funding

Description and Justification
This project is part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024-140 N.C.S.) and involves the reconstruction of D Street from Petaluma Boulevard South to the city’s limits.

This project will be closely coordinated with planned water main replacement (C67502332) and sewer main replacement (C66402350) capital improvement projects.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-74

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pavement Restoration - Caulfield Lane C16102428

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16102428
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 168 168 167 335 Administration / Legal 2 2 5 7 Construction Contracts - 1,000 2,350 3,350 Construction Mgmt - 25 35 60 Contingency - 200 243 443
CIP Overheads 2 2 12 20 34 TOTAL USES $ - 172$ 172$ $ 1,409 $ 2,648 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,229 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 172 172 175 347 Street Maintenance / Highway Users Tax - 532 532 Go Sonoma Transportation Sales Tax - 1,234 1,130 2,364 SB1 LPP - 986 986
TOTAL FUNDS $ - 172$ 172$ $ 1,409 $ 2,648 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,229 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project is part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.) and involves the reconstruction of Caulfield Land between Payran Street and Garfield Drive.

Going beyond basic repaving, this project will incorporate “Complete Streets” improvements with Vision Zero principles to enhance safety and accessibility for people walking, bicycling, rolling, and driving. These efforts align with the City’s commitment t o reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation while striving to eliminate sever and fatal traffic collisions.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-75

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pavement Restoration – St. Francis Drive C16102537

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

FY25/26 Pavement Restoration - St. Francis Drive
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 60 60 60 Administration / Legal 5 5 5
Construction Contracts - 976 1,960 2,936 Construction Mgmt - 20 40 60 Contingency - 70 140 210
CIP Overheads 5 5 5 5 15 TOTAL USES -$ 70$ 70$ $ -$ 1,071$ 2 ,145 $ -$ -3,286$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 70 70 81 151
Infrastructure Bond- Measure U Sales Tax - 582 582 Future Bond Issue - 408 2,145 2,553 TOTAL FUNDS -$ 70$ 70$ $ -$ 1,071$ 2 ,145 $ -$ -3,286$ Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28

Description and Justification
This project is part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024-140 N.C.S.) and involves the reconstruction of St.

Francis Drive between Caulfield Lane and South McDowell Boulevard.

Going beyond basic repaving, this project will incorporate “Complete Streets” improvements with Vision Zero principles to enhance safety and accessibility for people walking, bicycling, rolling, and driving. These efforts align with the City’s commitment t o reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transportation while striving to eliminate sever and fatal traffic collisions.

This project will be closely coordinated with planned water services replacement (C67502330), sewer main replacement (C66402556), and urban recycled water expansion
(C66402555) capital improvement projects.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-76

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FY25/26 Pavement Preventative Maintenance New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

FY25/26 Pavement Preventative Maintenance
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 30 30 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 600 600
Construction Mgmt - 30 30
Contingency - 50 50
CIP Overheads - 5 5
TOTAL USES -$ $ - -$ 715$ $ -$ -$ -$ - 715$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Infrastructure Bond- Measure U Sales Tax - 715 715 TOTAL FUNDS -$ $ - -$ 715$ $ -$ -$ -$ - 715$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Pavement preventative maintenance is a key component
of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.), aimed at maintaining and improving the quality of Petaluma’s Road network. The program combines
preventative maintenance, such as slurry and crack
sealing to extend the lifespan of streets in fair condition , with full restoration efforts focused on the more
deteriorated roadway segments.

Preventative maintenance will be conducted at various
locations throughout the city, guided by the City’s Street Ranking Framework. This framework prioritizes locations based on factors such as safety, utility coordination, public input, and climate resilience, ensuring strategic and
impactful use of resources.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2025/26
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-77

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FY26/27 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

FY26/27 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 416 416 Administration / Legal - 9 9 Construction Contracts - 8,276 8,276 Construction Mgmt - 558 558
Contingency - 1,375 1,375
CIP Overheads - 91 91
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,725 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,725 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 527 527
Future Bond Issue - 10,198 10,198
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,725 $ - $ - $ - $ 10,725 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

Description and Justification
The FY26/27 Pavement Restoration and Maintenance
projects are part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.) , balancing road restoration with preventative maintenance to address immediate needs
while extending the lifespan of streets in fair condition.

This year’s program includes restoration projects on Casa Grande Road, Old Redwood Highway, and North Webster
Street, as well as preventative maintenance treatments such as slurry and crack sealing across various locations throughout the city.

Guided by the City’s Street Ranking Framework, project
selection considers safety, utility coordination, climate resilience, public input, and geographic equity.

Improvements will incorporate Complete Streets and
Vision Zero principles, incorporating pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure and traffic calming measures to
enhance safety and accessibility for all users.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

CIP-78

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FY27/28 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

FY27/28 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 493 493 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 6,927 6,927
Construction Mgmt - 396 396
Contingency - 1,190 1,190
CIP Overheads - 37 37
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,043 $ - $ - $ 9,043 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 445 445
Future Bond Issue - 8,598 8,598
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,043 $ - $ - $ 9,043 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

Description and Justification
The FY2 7/28 Pavement Restoration and Maintenance
projects are part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.) , balancing road restoration with preventative maintenance to address immediate needs
while extending the lifespan of streets in fair condition.

This year’s program includes restoration projects on Daniel Drive and Residential East , as well as preventative
maintenance treatments such as slurry and crack sealing across various locations throughout the city.

Guided by the City’s Street Ranking Framework, project
selection considers safety, utility coordination, climate resilience, public input, and geographic equity.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

CIP-79

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FY28/29 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

FY28/29 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 483 483 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 7,219 7,219
Construction Mgmt - 482 482
Contingency - 1,447 1,447
CIP Overheads - 45 45
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,676 $ - $ 9,676 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 476 476
Future Bond Issue - 9,200 9,200
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,676 $ - $ 9,676 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2028/29
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

Description and Justification
The FY2 8/29 Pavement Restoration and Maintenance
projects are part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.) , balancing road restoration with preventative maintenance to address immediate needs
while extending the lifespan of streets in fair condition.

This year’s program includes restoration projects on
Western and Residential West , as well as preventative maintenance treatments such as slurry and crack sealing across various locations throughout the city.

Guided by the City’s Street Ranking Framework, project
selection considers safety, utility coordination, climate resilience, public input, and geographic equity.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

CIP-80

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
FY29/30 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

FY29/30 Pavement Restoration & Maintenance
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 431 431 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 6,107 6,107
Construction Mgmt - 430 430
Contingency - 1,291 1,291
CIP Overheads - 41 41
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,300 $ 8,300 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees - 408 408
Future Bond Issue - 7,892 7,892
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,300 $ 8,300 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2029/30
Estimated Completion: FY 2029/30
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jeff Stutsman
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

Description and Justification
The FY2 9/30 Pavement Restoration and Maintenance
projects are part of the City’s current 5 -Year Paving Plan (No. 2024 -140 N.C.S.) , balancing road restoration with preventative maintenance to address immediate needs
while extending the lifespan of streets in fair condition.

This year’s program includes restoration projects on
Washington Street and Midtown , as well as preventative maintenance treatments such as slurry and crack sealing across various locations throughout the city.

Guided by the City’s Street Ranking Framework, project
selection considers safety, utility coordination, climate resilience, public input, and geographic equity.

For more information on the 5 -Year Paving Plan, visit:
https://cityofpetaluma.org/street-pavement/

CIP-81

PUBLIC WORKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-82

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 6690.66999
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) Page No FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C66401416 Tertiary Filtration System
Expansion CIP-84 10,850$ 8,329$ 19,179$ 265$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 19,444$ 100% C66501936
Agricultural Recycled Water
System Expansion – Adobe
Road (Phase One)
CIP-85 346 2,702 3,048 1,229 - - - - 4,277 100% New
Agricultural Recycled Water
System Expansion - Adobe
Road (Phase Two)
CIP-86 - - - 205 1,522 2,633 - - 4,360 100% New Agriculture Recycled Water
Pipeline Expansion Program CIP-87 - - - - - - 2,000 2,000 4,000 100% C66401302
Agricultural Recycled Water
System - Turnout And Meter
Replacements
CIP-88 - - - - 30 718 - - 748 100% New Recycled Water Fill Station CIP-89 - - - - 130 456 - - 586 100% C66502347
Urban Recycled Water
System Expansion – Park
Irrigation Conversions
CIP-90 22 - 22 - 250 250 250 250 1,022 100% New
Urban Recycled Water
Expansion - Rainier
Extension
CIP-91 - 417 417 300 55 - - - 772 100% New
Urban Recycled Water
System Expansion - St.

Francis Drive
CIP-92 - 8 8 665 624 - - - 1,297 100% New
Urban Recycled Water
System Expansion -
Oakmead Extension
CIP-93 - - - - - 1,205 3,615 1,205 6,025 100% New
Urban Recycled Water
System Expansion -
Baywood Dr/101 Crossing
Extension
CIP-94 - - - - 662 4,414 2,895 - 7,971 100% New
Urban Recycled Water
System Expansion - Corona
Loop Extension
CIP-95 - - - - - - 590 3,950 4,540 100% New Urban Recycled Water
Pipeline Expansion Program CIP-96 - - - - - - - 2,000 2,000 100% New
Booster Pump Station 2 &
Recycled Water Distribution
System Improvements
CIP-98 - - - - 200 - - - 200 100% TOTAL $ 11,218 $ 11,456 $ 22,674 $ 2 ,664 $ 3,473 $ 9,676 $ 9,350 $ 9,405 $ 57,242 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital $ 10,753 $ 4,769 $ 15,522 $ 1 ,317 $ 1,389 $ 3,635 $ 3,575 $ 3,715 $ 29,153 Water Capital 23 79 102 - 776 3,906 3,624 4,805 13,213 Dept. of Water Resources Grant 153 6,048 6,201 1,668 200 - - - 8,069 Grants - - - 629 1,007 2,135 2,151 885 6,807 TOTAL $ 10,929 $ 10,896 $ 21,825 $ 3 ,614 $ 3,372 $ 9,676 $ 9,350 $ 9,405 $ 57,242 % of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
CIP-83

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Tertiary Filtration System Expansion C66401416

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66401416
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 2,520 840 3,360 115 3,475 Administration / Legal 13 10 23 23 Construction Contracts 8,050 6,617 14,667 14,667 Construction Mgmt 137 212 349 35 384 Contingency 550 550 110 660
CIP Overheads 130 100 230 5 235 TOTAL USES $ 10,850 $ 8 ,329 $ 1 9,179 265$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,444 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 10,559 4,725 15,284 - 15,284 DWR Grant via NBWRA 3,044 3,044 556 3,600 USBR Grant - 560 560
TOTAL FUNDS $ 10,559 $ 7 ,769 $ 1 8,328 $ 1 ,116 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,444 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility currently processes (treat and recycle) up to 5.0 million gallons of wastewater per day (MGD), but demand for recycled water exceeds supply and is expected to grow. This project will increase the facility’s capacity to produce up to 6.8 MGD by adding pumping
capacity, two cloth media filters, and a third ultraviolet (UV) light treatment system within an existing channel.

Construction began in early 2023 and is expected to continue in phases through to the end of 2025, with some tasks, related to ongoing testing and recordkeeping , potentially continuing into the following year.

This project is predominantly funded by Wastewater Capital .

However, the City has also secured grant funding from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and the CA Department of Water Resources through a partnership with the North Bay Water Reuse Authority (NBWRA).

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY2014/15 – Summer 2015
Estimated Completion: FY2025/26
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-84

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Agricultural Recycled Water System Expansion – Adobe Road (Phase One) C66501936

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66501936
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 334 50 384 384 Administration / Legal 2 2 4 4 Construction Contracts 1 2,000 2,001 938 2,939 Construction Mgmt 1 200 201 94 295 Contingency 400 400 188 588
CIP Overheads 8 50 58 10 68 TOTAL USES 346$ $ 2,702 $ 3,048 $ 1 ,229 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4 ,277 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 194 194 1,181 1,375 UMDR grant 153 2,702 2,855 47 2,902 TOTAL FUNDS 347$ $ 2,702 $ 3,049 $ 1 ,228 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4 ,277 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project is part of the City’s ongoing recycled water expansion program, aimed at delivering sustainable water resources to additional agricultural customers. Phase One will construct approximately 5,000 feet of recycled water pipeline along Adobe Road, marking the first step in establishing a looped system that enhances operational res iliency and reliability for the agricultural recycled water network.

The City has secured funding for this phase through a
combination of a grant from the California Department of Water Resources and allocations from the wastewater fund.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY2019/20 – Fall 2019
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: Lucas Pereira
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-85

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Agricultural Recycled Water System Expansion – Adobe Road (Phase Two) New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Agricultural Recycled Water System Expansion - Adobe Road (Phase Two) USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 200 200 400 Administration / Legal - 1 2 3 6 Construction Contracts - 1,000 2,000 3,000 Construction Mgmt - 100 200 300 Contingency - 200 400 600 CIP Overheads - 4 20 30 54 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - 205$ $ 1,522 $ 2 ,633 $ - $ - $ 4 ,360 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 136 1,177 1,667 2,980 USBR Grant - 69 345 966 1,380 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - 205$ $ 1,522 $ 2 ,633 $ - $ - $ 4 ,360 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Building on the progress of Phase One, Phase Two of this project will connect the newly constructed pipeline to an existing recycled water pipeline, completing the loop along Adobe Road.

This critical connection will further enhance the resiliency and reliability of the City’s agricultural recycled water system , enabling more efficient service to agricultural customers.

Phase Two is expected to be supported by federal funding through the City’s partnership with the North Bay Water Reuse Authority (NBWRA), with additional funding provided by the wastewater fund.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY2025/26
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Lucas Pereira
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-86

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Agriculture Recycled Water Pipeline Expansion Program

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Agriculture Recycled Water Pipeline Expansion Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 75 75 150 Administration / Legal - 5 5 10 Construction Contracts - 1,500 1,500 3,000 Construction Mgmt - 150 150 300 Contingency - 260 260 520 CIP Overheads - 10 10 20 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 4 ,000 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 2,000 2,000 4,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 4 ,000 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project evaluates potential expansion opportunities for the City's agricultural recycled water system . The Integrated Water Master Plan (IWMP) will guide priority areas for system expansion. Given the high demand on the recycled water
system, particularly during drought periods, careful
consideration will be taken in determining where expansion is necessary. Key factors being considered include demand on the system, installation costs, system resiliency, and future maintenance needs. As individual projects arise, the
corresponding funding will be allocated accordingly,
transitioning into dedicated capital improvement projects for their respective years. Staff will actively seek grant funding opportunities to support this expansion.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: Ongoing
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Chelsea Thompson
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-87

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Agricultural Recycled Water System – Turnout and Meter
Replacements C66401302

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66401302
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 30 20 50 Administration / Legal - 10 10
Construction Contracts - 592 592
Construction Mgmt - 36 36
Contingency - 55 55
CIP Overheads - 5 5
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - 30$ 718$ $ - $ - 748$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 30 718 748 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 30$ 718$ $ - $ - 748$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The City of Petaluma’s recycled water system, initiated in 1981 has expanded to provide irrigation for approximately 870 acres of agricultural land and 340 acres of golf courses, parks, and greenbelts. This system is a critical component of Petaluma's comm itment to sustainable water reuse,
distributing recycled water during the dry season to irrigation customers. However, many of the original turnouts —where the recycled water main connects to customer meters —are now over 30 years old and reaching the end of their
serviceable lives. This project will replace outdated turnouts, including flow meters and valves, to restore reliability and ensure compatibility with modern equipment. Over time, the availability of replacement parts for these aging components has diminished, creating significant maintenance
challenges. Additionally, some properties have ceased
using recycled water, further emphasizing the need to
modernize and streamline the system. The upgrades will
focus on enhancing operational reliability for h istorical recycled water users while aligning with other system
improvements, such as the Booster Pump Station 2 &
Recycled Water Distribution System Improvements project.

By upgrading these turnouts, the city will ensure a robust, independent recycled water distribution system that meets current and future demands for decades to come.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/2028
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-88

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Recycled Water Fill Station New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Recycled Water Fill Station
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 125 125 Administration / Legal - 2 2 4 Construction Contracts - 357 357
Construction Mgmt - 36 36
Contingency - 54 54
CIP Overheads - 3 7 10 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - 130$ 456$ $ - $ - 586$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 130 456 586 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 130$ 456$ $ - $ - 586$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The City of Petaluma currently operates recycled water fill stations that utilize fire hydrants and user water meters for flow measurement . This project will install automated
recycled water fill stations at Prince Park and the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility (ECWRF). Upgrades will include authentication measures to restrict access to authorized users, digital metering for precise water consumption
tracking, and a reporting mechanism to streamline invoicing.

Installing automated station s will enhance the safety, security, and accuracy of the City’s recycled water distribution process.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-89

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water System Expansion – Park Irrigation Conversions C66502347

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66502347
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 5 5 5 5 20 Administration / Legal - 5 5 5 5 20 Construction Contracts 21 21 200 200 200 200 821 Construction Mgmt 1 1 15 15 15 15 61 Contingency - 20 20 20 20 80 CIP Overheads - 5 5 5 5 20 TOTAL USES 22$ $ - 22$ $ - 250$ 250$ 250$ 250$ $ 1,022 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 63 63 63 63 252 Water Capital 23 23 186 187 187 187 770 TOTAL FUNDS 23$ $ - 23$ $ - 249$ 250$ 250$ 250$ 1,022 $ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The City of Petaluma plans to deliver recycled water to high - volume potable water users such as schools, parks, and
landscape assessment districts in the northeastern section of the city. As part of the broader urban recycled water system expansion, this project focuses on converting irrigation systems near recently installed recycled water mains. Project work will also ensure park irrigation systems comply with regulations associated with recycled water use , including the replacement of sprinkler heads, valve boxes, and signage to indicate the use of recycled water at each site.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson

☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-90

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Rainier Extension C66402554

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402554
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 30 30 30 Administration / Legal 2 2 2
Construction Contracts 300 300 245 55 600 Construction Mgmt 20 20 10 30 Contingency 60 60 40 100 CIP Overheads 5 5 5 10 TOTAL USES $ - 417$ 417$ 300$ 55$ $ - $ - $ - 772$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 43 43 43
Water Capital 74 74 - 55 129 Dept. of Water Resources Grant 300 300 300 600 TOTAL FUNDS $ - 417$ 417$ 300$ 55$ $ - $ - $ - 772$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Rainier
Extension project aims to expand Petaluma’s recycled water system, reducing the use of potable water for irrigation at schools, parks, and greenbelts along the Rainier Avenue corridor. This extension will provide critical recycled water access to areas currently dependent on potable water,
supporting the city's sustainability and water conservation goals. The project includes the installation of a recycled water pipeline along Rainier Avenue toward North M cDowell
Boulevard, facilitating future recycled water services for nearby public spaces. This project is funded in part through state grants obtained via Petaluma’s partnership with the Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: George Howard
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-91

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water System Expansion – St. Francis C66402555

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402555
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 6 6 4 10 Administration / Legal 1 1 1
Construction Contracts - 476 544 1,020 Construction Mgmt - 71 31 102 Contingency - 107 46 153 CIP Overheads 1 1 7 3 11 TOTAL USES $ - $ 8 $ 8 665$ 624$ $ - $ - $ - $ 1,297 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 1 1 - 119 120 Water Capital 5 5 - 405 410 USBR grant 2 2 765 - 767 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ 8 $ 8 765$ 524$ $ - $ - $ - $ 1,297 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project aims to expand the City’s recycled water
expansion program by installing additional pipel ine in the St.

Francis area. This expansion will connect more landscape irrigation customers, supporting efforts to offset potable water demand in areas currently served by the potable system and allow for future connection to the Lakeville area.

Emphasizing a strategic and cost -effective approach, this project will coordinate closely with the water service
replacement (C67502330), sewer main replacement
(C66402556), and the pavement restoration ( C16102537)
projects along St. Francis Drive. By aligning these initiatives, the City of Petaluma aims to optimize operational efficiency, minimize community disruption, and realize cost savings, ensuring the long -term resilience and functionality of this essential infrastructure.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/2025
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/2027
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-92

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Oakmead New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Oakmead Extension USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 600 600 Administration / Legal - 5 5
Construction Contracts - 598 3,000 502 4,100 Construction Mgmt - 200 200 400 Contingency - 375 425 800 CIP Overheads - 2 40 78 120 TOTAL USES $$ - - -$ $$ - -$$ $ $ 1 3 , 1,6 2,6,0210505255 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 301 904 301 1,506 Water Capital - 603 1,809 603 3,015 Title XVI Grant - 301 902 301 1,504 TOTAL FUNDS $$ - - -$ $$ - -$$ $ $ 1 3 , 1,6 2,6,0210505255 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Oakmead extension project will install recycled water pipelines in key areas to extend service to landscape
irrigation customers, including parks, schools, and
community facilities. This project includes 1,700 feet of pipeline along Cypress Drive from the Shollenberger Park entrance to South McDowell Boulevard, 1,100 feet along Pine View Way, and 4,300 feet along S outh McDowell Boulevard. from Cypress Drive to Lakeville Highway. Th is Oakmead
expansion also involves converting existing irrigation systems to recycled water, reducing the city’s reliance on potable water. This project aligns with Petaluma's Integrated Water Master Plan and contributes to long -term water supply
resiliency.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: FY 2029/30
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-93

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Baywood Dr/101 Crossing New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Baywood Dr/101 Crossing Extension USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 640 300 940 Administration / Legal - 2 10 5 17 Construction Contracts - 3,080 2,200 5,280 Construction Mgmt - 308 220 528 Contingency - 667 440 1,107 CIP Overheads - 20 49 30 99 TOTAL USES $$ - - -$ $ - 662$ $$ 42 ,,481945 $ -$ 7,971 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 886 608 1,494 Water Capital - 2,660 1,628 4,288 US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) - 662 868 659 2,189 TOTAL FUNDS $$ - - -$ $ - 662$ $$ 42 ,,481945 $ -$ 7,971 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Baywood Drive/101 Crossing extension project is an
important step in the City’s urban recycled water expansion program, designed to connect the recycled water system
across the 101 Freeway. This project will install 600 linear feet of 12-inch diameter pipeline under the freeway, creating an essential connection to extend recycled water access to new areas. This extension will not only serve existing
landscape irrigation customers but will also optimize the use of the city’s current recycled water infras tructure, supporting the City's goal to reduce potable water usage. Initial design and coordination with Caltrans are planned to ensure a
smooth integration of this infrastructure upgrade. Supported by a grant from United States Bur eau of Reclamation
(USBR), this project aligns with Petaluma's Integrated Water Master Plan and contributes to long -term water supply
resiliency.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

CIP-94

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Corona Loop New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Urban Recycled Water System Expansion - Corona Loop Extension USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 575 575 Administration / Legal - 5 10 15 Construction Contracts - 3,000 3,000 Construction Mgmt - 300 300
Contingency - 600 600
CIP Overheads - 10 40 50 TOTAL USES $$ - - -$ $$ $ - - - 590$ $$ 34 ,,955400 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 851 851
Water Capital - 2,515 2,515
US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) - 590 584 1,174 TOTAL FUNDS $$ - - -$ $$ $ - - - 590$ 3,950 $ 4,540 $ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Corona Loop extension project aims to expand
Petaluma’s recycled water distribution network by installing additional pipelines along the Corona corridor. This
expansion will connect more landscape irrigation customers, supporting efforts to offset potable water demand in areas currently served by the potable system. By strategically expanding recycled water access in alignment with the
Integrated Water Master Plan, the Corona Loop extension will enhance water supply resiliency across the city . Supported by a grant from USBR, this project aligns with Petaluma's Integrated Water Master Plan and contributes to long-term water supply resiliency.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2028/29
Estimated Completion: FY 2029/30
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

CIP-95

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Urban Recycled Water Pipeline Expansion Program

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Urban Recycled Water Pipeline Expansion Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 75 75 Administration / Legal - 5 5
Construction Contracts - 1,500 1,500 Construction Mgmt - 150 150
Contingency - 260 260
CIP Overheads - 10 10
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2 ,000 $ 2 ,000 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 500 500
Water Capital - 1,500 1,500
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2 ,000 $ 2 ,000 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The City of Petaluma is committed to water conservation, which is particularly crucial during drought periods. The City is working on expansion of its urban recycled water system.

Locations for expansion will be determined carefully and guided by priority projects as identified in the Integrated Water Master Plan (IWMP) to optimize expansion of the system. Key considerations for expansion sites will also include the potential to offset potable water usage, associated installation and maintenance costs, and the overall resiliency of the system. As individual projects arise, the corresponding funding will be allocated accordingly, transitioning into dedicated capital improvement projects for their respective years.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: Ongoing
Estimated Completion: Ongoing

☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-96

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Existing and Future Recycled Water Infrastructure and Customers

CIP-97

RECYCLED WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Booster Pump Station 2 & Recycled Water Distribution System Improvements New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Booster Pump Station 2 & Recycled Water Distribution System Improvements USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 200 200 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - -
Construction Mgmt - -
Contingency - -
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - 200$ $ - $ - $ - 200$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 200 200
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 200$ $ - $ - $ - 200$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Booster Pump Station 2 (BPS2) & Recycled Water
Distribution System Improvements project will
modernize and secure the historic recycled water
infrastructure, initially built around 50 years ago, to better serve agricultural customers. This project
includes a comprehensive evaluation of the existing
force main and an assessment of BPS2’s future, as it
currently resides on leased land and underwent a minor
controls upgrade in 2012. Planned improvements
encompass the design and construction of upgraded
pipelines and enhancements to BPS2. Once complete,
these upgrades will provide a robust, independent
recycled water distribution system extending from the
intersection of Brown’s Lane and South Ely Road to
BPS2 and beyond, ensuring reliable service for decades
to come.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-98

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

SURFACE WATER PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 3160.31600
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) Page No. FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C16501931 Storm Drain Trash Capture
Device Pilot CIP-100 4$ 62$ 66$ 126$ 1,281$ -$ -$ -$ 1,473$ 63% C16502254 Wilson Stormwater Pump
Station & Outfall Upgrades CIP-101 154 334 488 1,896 3,252 - - - 5,636 69% C16502431
Corona Creek Flood
Reduction and Habitat
Enhancement
CIP-102 - 51 51 86 321 245 - - 703 100% C16301518 Old Corona Road Water
Quality Mitigation CIP-103 116 125 241 392 1,870 - - - 2,503 65% TOTAL 274$ 572$ 846$ 2,500 $ 6,724 $ 245$ - $ - $ 10,315 $ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Storm Drainage Impact Fees 187$ 396$ 583$ 2,062 $ 2,027 $ 150$ - $ - $ 4,822 $ Caltrans Co-op Agreement 1,379 125 1,504 - 100 - - - 1,604 Grants - 51 51 46 519 95 - - 711 Undetermined - - - - 3,178 - - - 3,178 TOTAL 1,566 $ 572$ 2,138 $ 2,108 $ 5,824 $ 245$ - $ - $ 10,315 $ % of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
FY 24-25
CIP-99

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Storm Drain Trash Capture Device Pilot C16501931

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16501931
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 2 60 62 120 20 202 Administration / Legal 1 1 3 6 10 Construction Contracts - 1,100 1,100 Construction Mgmt 2 2 25 27 Contingency - 120 120
CIP Overheads 1 1 3 10 14 TOTAL USES $ 4 62$ 66$ 126$ $ 1,281 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,473 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Storm Drainage Impact Fees 4 62 66 126 370 562 EPA San Francisco Bay Watershed Improvement - 359 359 Undetermined - 552 552
TOTAL FUNDS $ 4 62$ 66$ 126$ $ 1,281 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,473 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
New requirements were issued from the California State Water Resources Control Board aimed at reducing the amount of trash entering the City’s waterways, the Petaluma River, and
ultimately the San Francisco Bay. In response, Petaluma is developing a trash reduction plan that may include installation of trash capture devices in strategic locations within the storm drainage system . The plan will also analyze alternative mitigation strategies, such as street sweeping, creek cleanups , targeted vegetation management and partnerships to reduce trash from private properties. Staff will assess the effectiveness, quality, operational impacts, and maintenance costs to inform a future comprehensive trash capture system. While this pilot addresses immediate requirements, additional steps will be needed for full compliance on efforts for trash capture.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 63%

Start Date: FY2018/19
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

CIP-100

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Wilson Stormwater Pump Station & Outfall Upgrades C16502254

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16502254
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 109 327 436 168 604 Administration / Legal 1 2 3 4 4 11 Construction Contracts 40 40 1,318 2,449 3,807 Construction Mgmt - 132 294 426 Contingency - 264 490 754 CIP Overheads 4 5 9 10 15 34 TOTAL USES 154$ 334$ 488$ 1,896$ 3,252$ -$ -$ -$ 5,636$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Storm Drainage Impact Fees 154 334 488 1,896 1,496 3,880 Undetermined A - 1,756 1,756
TOTAL FUNDS 154$ 334$ 488$ $ 1,896 $ 3,252 $ - $ - $ -$ 5,636 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will both evaluate and upgrade the existing Wilson stormwater pump station and its outfall into Petaluma River.

The pump station equipment is nearing the end of its lifespan, relies on specialized and difficult -to-find parts, and demands frequent maintenance. Upgrading the station will ensure its continued efficiency during heavy rainfall, reducing the risk of flooding in the area.

A feasibility study was conducted to explore design
alternatives, leading to a recommendation to electrify the archaic gas powered pumps as well as convert the enclosed pump station to an open outdoor configuration. The design phase began in September 2024 , with c onstruction
anticipated to begin in 2026.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 69%

Start Date: FY 2021/22
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
A Undetermined sources could utilize sources such as future grants, federal/state/local programs, or donations. As funding becomes available and is sufficient to cover project cost, funding Sources will be updated and identified.

CIP-101

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Corona Creek Flood Reduction and Habitat Enhancement C16502431

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16502431
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 50 50 85 - 135 Administration / Legal - 11 11
Construction Contracts - 250 200 450 Construction Mgmt - 25 20 45 Contingency - 25 20 45 CIP Overheads 1 1 1 10 5 17 TOTAL USES $ - 51$ 51$ 86$ 321$ 245$ $ - $ - 703$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Storm Drainage Impact Fees - 40 161 150 351 EPA San Francisco Bay Watershed Improvement 51 51 46 160 95 352 TOTAL FUNDS $ - 51$ 51$ 86$ 321$ 245$ $ - $ - 703$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project initially focused on restoring and maintaining Corona Creek between Sonoma Mountain Parkway and
Kenilworth Junior High School at Riesling Road, but has since needed to expand in scope to include a detailed hydraulic study of the area . Utilizing the City’s new flood model, this study will assess and provide recommendations for a more comprehensive stormwater and flood mitigation project. The primary goals are to restore its capacity during design storms, improve water quality, and mitigate out-of-bank flows near the Sonoma Mountain Parkway crossing. A conceptual design will be developed, based on existing contours and the evaluation of adjacent sites for opportunities for widening, meandering, and slowing the peak storm flows, as well as identifying space for habitat-friendly areas and vegetation.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Oriana Hart
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-102

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Old Corona Road Water Quality Mitigation C16301518

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C16301518
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 112 120 232 342 30 604 Administration / Legal 4 4 15 19 Construction Contracts - 1,500 1,500 Construction Mgmt 1 1 110 111 Contingency - 30 220 250 CIP Overheads 3 1 4 5 10 19 Sonoma County Contribution 116$ 125$ 241$ 392$ 1,870$ -$ -$ -$ 2,503$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Storm Drainage Impact Fees 29 29 29 Caltrans Co-op Agreement 1,379 125 1,504 100 1,604 Undetermined A - 870 870
TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,408 125$ $ 1,533 $ - 970$ $ - $ - $ - $ 2,503 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
In 2017, the City partnered with Caltrans on a stormwater treatment project to mitigate potential water quality impacts following the widening of Highway 101. Central to this project is a flow diversion structure designed to channel water from an existing drainage ditch into a proposed bio-retention basin. After additional evaluation, the Water Quality Control Board (WQCB) requested Caltrans include additional treatment areas. To address this, a section of Lakeville Highway (CA-116) near the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility was earmarked to expand the required stormwater treatment area. The full scope of this project is unknown at this time as Caltrans is still in negotiations with the WQCB for approval of the final treatment site (s). Once the additional treatment site(s) have been selected and approved by the WQCB, the original partnership agreement between Caltrans and the City will need to be updated to outline the final site selection area (s) and funding agreement. The overall project timeline was adjusted to allow Caltrans time for obtaining regulatory approval.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 65%

Start Date: FY2014/15 – Fall 2014
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/2027
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Oriana Hart
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

CIP-103

SURFACE WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-104

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

TRANSIT PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 6590.65999
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C65502214Transit Fleet Charging
Infrastructure CIP-106 56$ 1,573$ 1,629$ -$ 1,335$ -$ -$ -$ 2,964$ 100% C65502211Bus Stop Improvements CIP-107 68 220 288 90 467 89 98 107 1,139 100% C65202110Transit Admin Building Roof
Overlay CIP-108 1 1 2 25 153 - - - 180 100% C65202415Transit Facility Renovation CIP-109 7 - 7 - 299 - - - 306 100% C65502212Transit Facility Fence and
Gate Improvements CIP-110 6 - 6 - 310 - - - 316 100% TOTAL 138$ 1,794$ 1,932$ 115$ 2,564$ 89$ 98$ 107$ 4,905$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
TDA Transit Capital 138$ 603$ 741$ 9$ 1,400$ 54$ 78$ 86$ 2,368$ Federal Transit
Administration - 65 65 - 117 - - - 182 Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 14 50 64 12 118 20 20 21 255 PG&E EV Fleet Ready
Program - - - - 600 - - - 600 Transit and Intercity Rail
Capital Program - 1,076 1,076 78 331 15 - - 1,500 TOTAL 152$ 1,794 $ 1,946 $ 99$ 2,566 $ 89$ 98$ 107$ 4,905 $ FY 25
Page
No.
% of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
CIP-105

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Transit Fleet Charging Infrastructure C65502214

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C65502214
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 53 50 103 103 Administration / Legal 1 14 15 10 25 Construction Contracts 1,337 1,337 1,215 2,552 Construction Mgmt 30 30 20 50 Contingency 100 100 50 150 CIP Overheads 2 42 44 40 84 TOTAL USES 56$ $ 1,573 $ 1,629 $ -$ 1,335 $ - $ - $ -$ 2,964 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
TDA Transit Capital 56 568 624 735 1,359 FTA 5307 TCP 65 65 65
PG&E EV Fleet Ready Program - 600 600
Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program 940 940 940 TOTAL FUNDS 56$ $ 1,573 $ 1,629 $ - 735$ 600$ $ - $ -$ 2,964 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
As Petaluma Transit begins its transition to an
all-electric fleet, with the first battery-electric buses slated for arrival in 2025, the City is installing charging infrastructure at its bus yard on 555 North McDowell
Boulevard. The project will be delivered in two phases, with each phase providing charging capacity for 10
buses, resulting in a total capacity for 20 buses upon
project completion. The City has secured participation
in PG&E’s Electric Vehicle Fleet Ready Program which
will upgrade the bus yard’s electrical service at no cost to the City and offer rebates and incentives to support the City's charging infrastructure procurement and
installation. Additional funding support comes from the Intercity Rail Capital Program and the Transportation
Development Act.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/2027
Project Manager: Paul Geoghegan
Department Rep: Jared Hall
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________

CIP-106

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Bus Stop Improvements C65502211

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C65502211
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 40 10 11 12 13 86 Administration / Legal 3 2 5 5 2 3 3 18 Construction Contracts 64 218 282 50 330 55 60 66 843 Construction Mgmt - 40 7 7 8 62 Contingency - 70 11 12 13 106 CIP Overheads 1 1 12 3 4 4 24 TOTAL USES 68$ 220$ 288$ 90$ 467$ 89$ 98$ 107$ 1,139 $ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
TDA Transit Capital 68 34 102 4 54 78 86 324 Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 14 50 64 12 118 20 20 21 255 Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program 136 136 78 331 15 560 TOTAL FUNDS 82$ 220$ 302$ 90$ 453$ 89$ 98$ 107$ 1,139 $ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project aims to make accessibility, safety, and comfort upgrades to bus stops throughout the city. Planned
improvements include the purchase and installation of new bus shelters at high -priority locations, updated paths of travel for improved accessibility, new added amenities such as trash cans, bike racks, and real -time arrival/departure signs. With these upgrades the City aims to increase bus ridership and thereby reduce greenhouse gas emissions
from solo transportation.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Jared Hall
Department Rep: Jared Hall
☒Climate First ☒Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-107

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Transit Administration Building Roof Overlay C65202110

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C65202110
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 25 25 Administration / Legal 1 1 2 3 5 Construction Contracts - 115 115
Construction Mgmt - 12 12
Contingency - 18 18
CIP Overheads - 5 5
TOTAL USES $$ 1 1 2$ 25$ 153$ $ - $ - $ - 180$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
TDA Transit Capital 1 1 2 9 122 133 Federal Transit Administration - 47 47 TOTAL FUNDS $$ 1 1 2$ 9$ 169$ $ - $ - $ - 180$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The roof of the Transit Administration Building has exceeded its useful lifespan and needs to be replaced. The cost estimate for replacing the roof is based on similar roofing overlay work performed using thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) on the existing roof. Additionally, minor repairs will be made to the Operations Building to address leaks . These improvements will help to maintain the reliability of Petaluma’s existing transit facilities, ensuring they effectively support staff and operations while better serving the community . This project will be funded with Federal Transit Authority (FT A) 5307 grant funding and T ransportation Development Act (TDA) sales tax enterprise funds.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Diane Ramirez
Department Rep: Jared Hall
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-108

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Transit Facility Renovation C65202415

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C65202415
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 6 6 5 11 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 151 151 Construction Mgmt - 15 15
Contingency - 122 122
CIP Overheads 1 1 6 7 TOTAL USES $ 7 $ - $ 7 $ - 299$ $ - $ - $ - 306$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
TDA Transit Capital 7 0 7 299 306 TOTAL FUNDS $ 7 $ - $ 7 $ - 299$ $ - $ - $ - 306$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Transit Administration and Operation Buildings' interiors have exceeded their functional lifespan and require updates.

Planned renovations include work in customer-facing areas, restrooms, offices, hallways, and the employee break room.

The scope of work will address issues such as cracked slabs and the resulting raised flooring through minor concrete repairs, along with repainting, reflooring/recarpeting, and other cosmetic maintenance . These renovations and
upgrades will provide a more functional and safe space for staff and the community.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jared Hall
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-109

TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Transit Facility Fence & Gate Improvements C65502212

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C65502212
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 5 5 20 25 Administration / Legal - 5 5 Construction Contracts - 220 220 Construction Mgmt - 22 22
Contingency - 33 33
CIP Overheads 1 1 10 11 TOTAL USES $ 6$ - $ 6$ - 310$ $ - $ - $ - 316$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
TDA Transit Capital 6 6 240 246
FTA 5307 TCP - 70 70
TOTAL FUNDS $ 6$ - $ 6$ - 310$ $ - $ - $ - 316$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will enhance the security and
functionality of the Transit Facility by upgrading the
existing fencing and gate system. Building on
improvements made in 2021 to pedestrian access
points and facility gates along Transport Way, this
project focuses on the three transit facility access
gates located along North McDowell Boulevard,
Rainier Avenue, and Transport Way. The existing
chain-link gates require manual operation, and the
fencing has deteriorated over time, with sections
warped, bent, and rusted. The new gates will be
automated and motorized to open as buses
approach, improving efficiency and security .

Additionally, the fencing will be replaced with
sturdier, longer-lasting materials that require less
maintenance, similar to those installed on
Transport Way in 2021. These upgrades will
provide a secure, durable, and low -maintenance
solution that aligns with the facility’s operational
needs and enhances overall safety.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Jared Hall
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-110

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

WASTEWATER UTILITY PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026

WASTEWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 6690.66999
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) Page No. FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C66501518 CNG Fueling Station at
ECWRF CIP-112 7,669 - 7,669 264 - - - - 7,933 100% C66401728 ECWRF High Strength
Waste Facilities CIP-113 6,575 150 6,725 307 - - - - 7,032 100% C66501838 ECWRF Outfall Replacement CIP-114 2,343 430 2,773 294 - - - - 3,067 100% C66502032 PIPS Parallel Force Main CIP-115 1,083 789 1,872 14,259 28,255 9,422 - - 53,808 100% C66501930 PIPS Upgrade and Pump
Replacement CIP-116 3 456 459 507 12,560 6,285 - - 19,811 100% New PIPS Force Main
Rehabilitation CIP-117 - - - - - 135 2,603 - 2,738 100% C66402453 ECWRF Digester (#2) Repair CIP-118 1 273 274 2,940 - - - - 3,214 100% C66501840 ECWRF Chemical System
Upgrade CIP-119 1,024 5,219 6,243 2,284 9,163 - - - 17,690 100% C66402349 ECWRF Oxidation Pond
Flow Structure Rehab CIP-120 621 220 841 2,815 2,815 - - - 6,471 100% C66402246
Sewer Force Main
Rehabilitation/ Replacement
Program
CIP-121 1 - 1 - 105 450 313 313 1,182 100% C66402348
Sewer Main Replacement -
Howard Street and Various
Locations
CIP-122 7 1,095 1,102 1,555 - - - - 2,657 100% C66402350 Sewer Main Replacement- D
Street CIP-123 2 85 87 83 1,089 2,529 - - 3,788 100% C66402556
Sewer Main Replacement -
St. Francis and Various
Locations
CIP-124 - 18 18 18 304 130 - - 470 100% New Sewer System Rehab-
Replacement Program CIP-125 - - - - 1,253 1,253 1,478 3,753 7,737 100% New Sewer Pump Station
Upgrade - Fairgrounds CIP-126 - - - - - - 1,500 - 1,500 100% C66502042 C Street Lift Station and
Collection System Upgrades CIP-127 180 - 180 - 232 1,778 2,110 - 4,300 100% C66501003 Manhole Rehabilitation CIP-128 484 - 484 - 712 - 356 - 1,552 100% E66502451 ECWRF Oxidation Pond
Dredge CIP-129 3 - 3 - 2,326 - - - 2,329 100% New
Oakmead, Redwood, And
Outlet Mall Lift Station
Upgrades
CIP-130 - - - - - 960 1,880 - 2,840 100% New ECWRF Evaporative Cooler
Replacement CIP-131 - - - - 450 - - - 450 100% New
ECWRF Loading Evaluation
and Treatment Capacity
Improvements
CIP-132 - - - - 500 500 - - 1,000 100% New ECWRF Parking Lot
Construction CIP-133 - - - 155 1,775 - - - 1,930 100% TOTAL 19,996$ 8,735$ 28,731$ 25,481$ 61,539$ 23,442$ 10,240$ 4,066$ 153,499$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
California Energy Comm
Grant 2,700$ -$ 2,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,700$ Developer Contribution 373 - 373 - - - - - 373 Future Bond - - - - 49,978 15,712 - - 65,690 Waste Water Capital 17,540 8,665 26,205 25,214 11,328 7,683 10,240 4,066 84,736 TOTAL $ 20,613 $ 8,665 $ 29,278 $ 2 5,214 $ 61,306 $ 23,395 $ 10,240 $ 4 ,066 $ 153,499 % of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Estimate
FY 24-25
Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
CIP-111

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CNG Fueling Station at ECWRF C66501518

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66501518
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1,427 1,427 25 1,452 Administration / Legal 3 3 3
Construction Contracts 5,684 5,684 179 5,863 Construction Mgmt 443 443 15 458 Contingency - 35 35
CIP Overheads 112 112 10 122 TOTAL USES 7,669$ -$ 7,669$ 264$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,933$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
California Energy Comm Grant 2,700 2,700 2,700 Waste Water Capital 5,233 5,233 5,233
TOTAL FUNDS $ 7,933 $ -7,933$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 7,933 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project includes the construction of a gas scrubbing facility and a Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility (ECWRF) and Recology Sonoma Marin’s facility in Petaluma. The ECWRF’s anaerobic digester produces methane gas , which is currently used for sludge heating, with all excess gas flared off. With the construction of a new digester and the addition of high -strength waste to the wastewater treatment process, the plant will nearly double its production of methane gas. The construction of a gas scrubbing facility and CNG fueling station will allow for the excess methane gas to be scrubbed, compressed, and used to fuel Recology vehicles. This project will support Petaluma’s commitment to sustainability and environmental responsibility by maximizing methane use, enhancing ECWRF’s efficiency, and contributing to cleaner transportation through Recology’s CNG vehicles. This project will be primarily funded by grant funds from the California Energy Commission (CEC) with additional funding from
wastewater capital. The timeline for proj ect c ompletion will be contingent upon the repairs and upgrades to Digester #2 (C66402453).

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2015/16 – Fall 2015
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-112

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF High-Strength Waste Facilities C66401728

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66401728
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1,122 150 1,272 100 1,372 Administration / Legal 1 1 2 3 Construction Contracts 5,157 5,157 150 5,307 Construction Mgmt 217 217 10 227 Contingency - 40 40
CIP Overheads 78 78 5 83 TOTAL USES $ 6,575 150$ $ 6,725 307$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,032 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 6,594 131 6,725 307 - 7,032 TOTAL FUNDS $ 6,594 131$ $ 6,725 307$ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,032 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling
Facility (ECWRF) strategically repurposes existing
equipment to handle and treat high-strength waste
from local industries. Th is project also incorporates
the addition of a press to efficiently remove water
from sludge waste. Commencing in FY 2016/17 and
reaching substantial completion in FY 2020/21, this
project has operated in conjunction with the CNG
Fueling Station project (C66501518). In 2022, the
City of Petaluma secured permits from the Bay Area
Air Quality Management District and ongoing efforts
include continuous system testing and corrections to
the receiving pump st ation. This project showcases
Petaluma’s proactive approach to sustainable waste
management. The timeline for project completion will
be contingent upon the repairs and upgrades to
ECWRF Digester #2 (C66402453).

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2016/17 – Summer 2016
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-113

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Outfall Replacement C66501838

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66501838
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1,050 5 1,055 1,055 Administration / Legal 118 5 123 123 Construction Contracts 961 375 1,336 200 1,536 Construction Mgmt 173 33 206 10 216 Contingency - 74 74
CIP Overheads 41 12 53 10 63 TOTAL USES $ 2,343 430$ $ 2,773 294$ $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,067 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 2,381 392 2,773 294 3,067 TOTAL FUNDS $ 2,381 392$ $ 2,773 294$ $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 3,067 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Petaluma’s Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility
(ECWRF) previously used an outfall pipeline, consisting of an approximately 3,200 linear feet , 48-inch diameter pipe, to discharge safe, treated water to the Petaluma
River during the winter. This pipeline, constructed with older Techite fiberglass composite material from the
1970s, had deteriorated and required replacement. As an interim solution , a temporary pipe was installed in FY 2016/17. A new outfall was designed to be closer to the facility to limit impacts on the sensitive marshland habitat and reduce construction costs . By Fall 2023, the new
outfall was successfully installed and became
operational. Demolition of the old outfall within the
Petaluma River was completed in Fall 2024. While most
of the construction work has been completed, additional environmental monitoring and final repairs may continue into the next fiscal year.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2016/17 – Summer 2017
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-114

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
PIPS Parallel Force Main C66502032

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66502032
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1,063 774 1,837 115 1,952 Administration / Legal 2 10 12 5 17 Construction Contracts - 10,842 21,685 7,228 39,755 Construction Mgmt 2 2 1,084 2,168 723 3,977 Contingency 16 16 2,168 4,337 1,446 7,967 CIP Overheads 5 5 45 65 25 140 TOTAL USES 1,083$ 789$ 1,872$ 14,259$ 28,255$ 9,422$ -$ -$ 53,808$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Future Bond - 28,255 9,422 37,677 Waste Water Capital 1,085 787 1,872 14,259 16,131 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,085 787$ 1,872$ $$ 1 248,,225595 $ 9,422 $ - $ -$ 5 3,808 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The 2.5-mile-long, 36-inch-diameter force main from
the Primary Influent Pump Station (PIPS), situated
on Hopper Street, is essential for transporting
wastewater to the Ellis Creek Water Recycling
Facility. This force main is a critical pipeline and is nearing the end of its service life.

This project will install a parallel force main adjacent to the existing one, providing redundancy and
resiliency for the City’s wastewater collection
system. With the preliminary design completed, the
project will progress through its next phases which
include easement procurement, environmental
compliance, final design, and construction.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2018/19 – Spring 2019
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-115

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
PIPS Upgrade and Pump Replacement C66501930

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66501930
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 3 450 453 500 953 Administration / Legal 2 2 2 4 Construction Contracts - 10,000 5,000 15,000 Construction Mgmt - 500 250 750 Contingency - 2,000 1,000 3,000 CIP Overheads 4 4 5 60 35 104 TOTAL USES 3$ 456$ 459$ 507$ 12,560$ 6,285$ -$ -$ 19,811$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Future Bond - 12,560 6,290 18,850 Waste Water Capital 4 453 457 504 - - 961 TOTAL FUNDS $ 4 453$ 457$ 504$ $ 12,560 $ 6,290 $ - $ -$ 1 9,811 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Primary Influent Pump Station (PIPS) is a cornerstone of Petaluma’s wastewater infrastructure, channeling
wastewater from a majority of Petaluma to the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility for essential treatment. A recent condition assessment identified the need for immediate electrical and mechanical repairs to ensure operational reliability, as well as structural upgrades to ensure stability during seismic events. To determine the most cost-effective approach for addressing these needs, an alternativ es
analysis study is underway. Based on the study’s findings, this project will either rehabilitate or replace the existing pump station to address escalating maintenance demands
and support the integration of the new PIPS force main
connection.

The total project budget and timeline are preliminary
estimates and will be refined once the study is complete and a final path forward is determined.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Analysis
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ______________
CIP-116

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
PIPS Force Main Rehabilitation New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

PIPS Force Main Rehabilitation
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 125 75 200 Administration / Legal - 5 3 8 Construction Contracts - 2,000 2,000 Construction Mgmt - 150 150
Contingency - 350 350
CIP Overheads - 5 25 30 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 135$ $ 2,603 $ - $ 2,738 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 135 2,603 2,738 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 135$ $ 2,603 $ - $ 2,738 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The existing force main is a crucial pressurized conduit that channels wastewater from the Primary Influent Pump Station (PIPS) to the Ellis Creek Water Treatment Facility.

Recognizing the importance of a reliable wastewater
system, the City is currently advancing two key projects:
the installation of a new PIPS P arallel Force Main
(C66502023) and the PIPS Upgrade and Pump
Replacement (C66501930). Upon the successful
integration and operation of the new force main and pump station upgrades, the City will rehabilitate the existing force main. This proactive approach establishes a backup
system, enhancing the City’s wastewater system's
redundancy and overall resilience . Without such a
contingency plan, any failure in the force main could
jeopardize the City's ability to effectively transport
wastewater to the treatment facility. This project will include a comprehensive analysis to determine the most
suitable rehabilitation method, followed by the
commencement of construction once the new force main
is fully operational.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Analysis
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-117

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Digester (#2) Repair C66402453

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402453
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1 237 238 158 396 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts 20 20 2,060 2,080 Construction Mgmt 1 1 120 121 Contingency - 586 586
CIP Overheads 15 15 16 31 TOTAL USES $ 1 273$ 274$ $ 2,940 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,214 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 1 272 273 2,941 3,214 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1 272$ 273$ $ 2,941 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,214 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Digesters are an important component in the wastewater
treatment process. They are sealed tanks where
microorganisms break down organic sludge, which reduces sludge volume, generates renewable energy (in form of
combustible methane gas) , and ensures safe disposal of treated sludge. Currently, Digester #2 at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility is displaying concerning signs of corrosion and has experienced a recent gas leak . S taff promptly implemented a short-term repair; however, a long-term repair is essential to fully address the issue and prevent further gas from escaping. To fully understand the digester's structural integrity and determine the best course of action, a detailed structural investigation and condition assessment is needed.

This will require that the digester is temporarily taken offline, drained, and cleaned. The insights gained from this
investigation will guide the design and implementation of a solution. This project will ultimately help to ensure the safe and effici ent operation of our wastewater infrastructure , safeguarding both environmental health and community
safety.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________.

CIP-118

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Chemical System Upgrade C66501840

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66501840
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 992 1,000 1,992 230 110 2,332 Administration / Legal 3 3 6 1 7 Construction Contracts 3 3,360 3,363 1,440 8,358 13,161 Construction Mgmt 2 500 502 200 315 1,017 Contingency 24 336 360 394 338 1,092 CIP Overheads 20 20 20 41 81 TOTAL USES 1,024$ 5,219$ 6,243$ 2,284$ 9,163$ -$ -$ -$ 17,690$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Future Bond - 9,163 9,163
Waste Water Capital 1,029 5,214 6,243 2,284 - 8,527 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,029 $ 5,214 $ 6,243 $ 2,284 $ 9,163 $ - $ - $ -$ 1 7,690 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will upgrade the chemical, mechanical, and electrical equipment responsible for ensuring wastewater is safe before being discharged to the Petaluma River. The existing equipment is over 25 years old, and must be upgraded to comply with current regulations, enhance worker and system safety, and improve chemical process efficiency. This project not only ensures regulatory compliance but also contributes to environmental stewardship. Key project
components include replacing and relocating the hypochlorite dosing system, upgrading the chemical storage building, improving the chlorine contact basin, upgrading roadways for large delivery trucks, demolishing an old pump station, as well as replacing switchgears, a motor control center , and an emergency power backup system.

This project is divided into two phases. Phase One focuses on the hypochlorite dosing system, with anticipated completion in FY 2025/26. Phase Two addresses the remaining aspects of the project and is slated for completion in FY 2026/27.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2017/18 – Summer 2018
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-119

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Oxidation Pond Transfer Structure Rehabilitation C66402349

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402349
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 393 198 591 55 55 701 Administration / Legal 15 15 3 3 21 Construction Contracts 198 5 203 2,105 2,105 4,413 Construction Mgmt 3 2 5 316 316 637 Contingency 3 3 308 308 619 CIP Overheads 12 12 24 28 28 80 TOTAL USES 621$ 220$ 841$ $ 2,815 $ 2,815 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,471 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 623 218 841 2,815 2,815 6,471 TOTAL FUNDS 623$ 218$ 841$ $ 2,815 $ 2,815 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,471 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility (ECWRF) plays a pivotal role in Petaluma's wastewater management, with its ponds storing partially treated wastewater. The 15 structures that facilitate water flow through these ponds were built back in the 1970s and have shown signs of deterioration. Recognizing the critical nature of these structures, this project was initiated to address their aging infrastructure. While the need for expanded pond storage capacity was initially considered, preliminary design evalu ations revealed that such an expansion would not be economically feasible, given the high cost per acre -foot of additional s torage. Therefore, final design and construction will focus on the rehabilitation of specific components within the existing transfer structures and the replacement of deteriorated piping. By addressing these infrastructure challenges, this project will help to ensure the continued reliability and efficiency of the ECWRF and Petaluma’s commitment to sustainable and effective wastewater management.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-120

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Sewer Force Main Rehabilitation/Replacement Program C66402246

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402246
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 100 100 Administration / Legal - 2 3 2 2 9 Construction Contracts - 340 240 240 820 Construction Mgmt 1 1 40 25 25 91 Contingency - 60 43 43 146 CIP Overheads - 3 7 3 3 16 TOTAL USES $ 1 $ - $ 1 $ - 105$ 450$ 313$ 313$ $ 1,182 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 1 1 105 450 313 313 1,182 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1 $ - $ 1 $ - 105$ 450$ 313$ 313$ 1,182 $ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will evaluate and rehabilitate or replace the existing force mains at the City's Copeland, Wilmington, and Victoria Sewer lift stations . Given that these force mains are
approaching the end of their operational lifespans, their upkeep is needed to ensure a dependable sewer system. These mains play a n important role in facilitating the movement of water through the system, mitigating potential backups, and ensuring consistent functionality . Informed decision -making for this project is backed by the ongoing development of a sewer hydraulic model and the Sewer Master Plan. As individual projects arise, the corresponding funding will be allocated accordingly, transitioning into dedicated capital improvement projects for their respective years.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-121

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Sewer Main Replacement – Howard Street and Various Locations C66402348

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402348
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 6 30 36 36 Administration / Legal 5 5 5
Construction Contracts 875 875 1,087 1,962 Construction Mgmt 20 20 50 70 Contingency 140 140 418 558
CIP Overheads 1 25 26 26 TOTAL USES $ 7$ 1,095 1,102$ $ 1,555 $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 2,657 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 7 1,095 1,102 1,555 2,657 TOTAL FUNDS $ 7$ 1,095 1,102$ $ 1,555 $ - $ - $ - $ -$ 2,657 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
In coordination with the City’s upcoming paving projects, staff have identified segments of sewer mains along Howard Street and adjacent streets that require replacement due to age - related deterioration and structural deficiencies. Staff have also identified various additional locations with failed sewer main pipelines, in response to elevated maintenance demands, that pose significant risks of causing backups within the wastewater collection system. These critical project locations have been prioritized for immediate replacement.

Emphasizing a strategic and cost -effective approach, this project will coordinate closely with the water main replacement (C67502326) and the pavement restoration (C16102 435)
projects along Howard Street. By aligning these initiatives, the City of Petaluma aims to optimize operational efficiency, minimize community disruption, and realize cost savings, ensuring the long -term resilience and functionality of this essential infrastructure.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Sewer Main Replacement - D Street C66402350

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402350
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 2 79 81 79 160 Administration / Legal 2 2 4 2 8 Construction Contracts - 923 2,285 3,208 Construction Mgmt - 52 79 131 Contingency - 105 157 262 CIP Overheads 4 4 7 8 19 TOTAL USES 2$ 85$ 87$ 83$ 1,089$ 2,529$ -$ -$ 3,788$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 3 84 87 83 1,089 2,529 3,788 TOTAL FUNDS $ 3 84$ 87$ 83$ $ 1,089 $ 2,529 $ - $ -$ 3,788 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project replaces sewer mains within D Street and its connecting streets. Serving as a n important transmission line, this sewer main channels wastewater from its
surrounding regions to the C Street Lift Station. However, the current main is undersized and has a history of capacity issues at the intersection of D Street and Brown Court.

Replacement of the sewer main will not only increase the capacity of the sewer system but also address stormwater intrusion into the system —known as inflow and infiltration (I&I)—due to existing cracks or gaps. The defined boundaries of this project are from Petaluma Boulevard South to Sunny Slope Avenue.

To optimize efficiency, reduce disruptions, and manage costs more effectively, this project is working in coordination with the water main replacement ( C67502332) and paving
restoration (C16102251) projects along D Street.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: __________________
CIP-123

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Sewer Main Replacement - St. Francis and Various Locations C66402556

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66402556
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 15 15 15 30 Administration / Legal 1 1 3 2 6 Construction Contracts - 238 102 340 Construction Mgmt - 24 10 34 Contingency - 36 15 51 CIP Overheads 2 2 4 3 9 TOTAL USES $ - 18$ 18$ 18$ 304$ 130$ $ - $ - 470$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 18 18 18 304 130 470 TOTAL FUNDS $ - 18$ 18$ 18$ 304$ 130$ $ - $ - 470$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
In coordination with the City’s upcoming paving projects, staff have identified segments of the sewer mains along St.

Francis Drive and adjacent streets that require
replacement, primarily due to age-related deterioration and structural deficiencies. Replacing these sewer mains will address ongoing issues, reduce the frequency of required maintenance, and enhance overall flow within the system.

The upgraded infrastructure will contribute to a more
resilient and efficient sewer network for the community.

Emphasizing a strategic and cost-effective approach which will minimize disruptions and maximize efficiency, this project will coordinate closely with the water services replacement (C67502330), urban recycled water system
expansion (C66402555), pavement restoration
(C16102537) projects.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-124

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Sewer System Rehab-Replacement Program New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Sewer System Rehab-Replacement Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 75 75 75 75 300 Administration / Legal - 3 3 3 3 12 Construction Contracts - 1,000 1,000 1,225 3,500 6,725 Construction Mgmt - 50 50 50 50 200 Contingency - 120 120 120 120 480 CIP Overheads - 5 5 5 5 20 TOTAL USES $ - $ - -$ $ -$ 1,253 $ 1,253 $ 1,478 $ 3,753 $ 7,737 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 1,253 1,253 1,478 3,753 7,737 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - -$ $ -$ 1,253 $ 1,253 $ 1,478 $ 3,753 $ 7,737 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This is the forward-looking program for sewer main
replacements within the City of Petaluma to address the challenges posed by its aging wastewater collection
system. Following a comprehensive update to the Sewer
Master Plan, priority projects for rehabilitation and
replacement have been identified. The primary objective of these projects is twofold: to mitigate groundwater
intrusion and to uphold the structural integrity of the collection system. Funding allocations have been
identified for upcoming years to show the phased
advancement and progress of these projects. As individual projects arise, the corresponding funding will be allocated accordingly, transitioning into dedicated capital
improvement projects for their respective years.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: Ongoing
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-125

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Sewer Pump Station Upgrade – Fairgrounds New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Sewer Pump Station Upgrade - Fairgrounds
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 200 200 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 1,100 1,100 Construction Mgmt - 50 50
Contingency - 100 100
CIP Overheads - 50 50
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - $ 1,500 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - - 1,500 1,500 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500 $ - $ 1,500 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
For the last 50 years, the State has leased the 55 -acre fairgrounds property from the City of Petaluma, while retaining full control of all events that take place there. On December 31, 2023, the 50 -year lease expired, and the City took back control of the property. Upon assuming management of the property, the City executed agreements with each of the existing tenants during a period of transition to minimize disruptions as plans continue to be developed to ensure year - round public use of this taxpayer-owned property.

Now that the City is in charge of managing the property, it is evident that there are deferred maintenance issues that must be addressed to guarantee a safe and functional space for the public. One of these pressing needs is the replacement of the sewer pump station.

The existing pump station received initial, emergency repairs to achieve safe and basic operation and maintenance until a complete upgrade takes place . A complete demolition and rebuild of the existing pump station, wet well, and all associated equipment will be required once the future of the fairgrounds is determined.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2028/29
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-126

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
C Street Lift Station and Wastewater Collection System Upgrades C66502042

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66502042
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 176 176 225 401 Administration / Legal - 2 3 3 8 Construction Contracts - 1,500 1,750 3,250 Construction Mgmt 1 1 85 115 201 Contingency - 175 225 400 CIP Overheads 3 3 5 15 17 40 TOTAL USES 180$ -$ 180$ -$ 232$ 1,778$ 2,110$ -$ 4,300$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Developer Contribution 373 373 373
Waste Water Capital 91 91 1,726 2,110 3,927 TOTAL FUNDS 464$ $ - 464$ $ - $ -$ 1,726 $ 2,110 $ -$ 4,300 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
During significant storm events, the C Street Lift
Station and the surrounding wastewater collection
system have consistently exceeded their intended
capacity. This project will assess the performance
and condition of the collection system, pump
station, and force main, which are responsible for
transporting wastewater across the Petaluma
River. To ensure an informed approach, a sewer
hydraulic model is being developed alongside the
Sewer Master Plan, both of which will guide the
project’s design phase.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2019/20 – Fall 2019
Estimated Completion: TBD
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-127

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Manhole Rehabilitation C66501003

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C66501003
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 28 28 30 15 73 Administration / Legal 3 3 4 2 9 Construction Contracts 411 411 500 250 1,161 Construction Mgmt 34 34 60 30 124 Contingency - 100 50 150
CIP Overheads 8 8 18 9 35 TOTAL USES 484$ $ - 484$ $ - 712$ $ - 356$ $ - $ 1,552 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 484 484 712 356 1,552 TOTAL FUNDS 484$ $ - 484$ $ - 712$ $ - 356$ $ - $ 1,552 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Many of the Petaluma’s older manholes were originally built using brick and mortar. Over time, t he interior surfaces of these brick manholes have deteriorated, with the mortar significantly eroding. This has led to increased surface water, including groundwater and stormwater, entering the system, known as infiltration and inflows (I&I). Currently, operations staff is developing a manhole inspection and assessment program to prioritize manhole replacements. This project is ongoing and is a vital part of the city’s efforts to comply with regulatory goals to reduce I&I in the wastewater syst em and reduce risk of bacteria reaching the Petaluma River.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2010/11 – Spring 2011
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-128

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Oxidation Pond Dredge E66502451

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

E66502451
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 3 3 3 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 2,196 2,196 Construction Mgmt - 15 15
Contingency - 100 100
CIP Overheads - 15 15
TOTAL USES $ 3 $ - $ 3 $ - $ 2,326 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,329 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital 4 4 2,325 2,329 TOTAL FUNDS $ 4 $ - $ 4 $ - $ 2,325 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,329 Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2023/24
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
Description and Justification
Oxidation ponds are shallow basins used in wastewater
treatment where organic matter decompos es naturally with the help of microorganisms and oxygen. These ponds play a vital role in the treatment process, enabling the breakdown of pollutants and helping to purify wastewater before it is discharged or reused.

During the ECWRF Oxidation Pond Transfer Structure
Rehabilitation project ( C66402349), surveys revealed a sludge layer ranging from approximately 1.7 to 3.7 feet in the aerated lagoon and oxidation ponds 1, 2, and 3 at the Ellis Creek Water Treatment Facility . This accumulation has the potential to hinder the facility’s treatment process. Further sampling conducted in 2024 determine that sludge
accumulation in oxidation ponds 2 and 3 is minimal and does not require removal at this time.

This project focuses on d redging the accumulated sludge in oxidation pond 1 and the aerated lagoon as needed to ensure the continued effectiveness of the treatment process.

CIP-129

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Oakmead, Redwood, and Outlet Mall Lift Station Upgrades New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Oakmead, Redwood, And Outlet Mall Lift Station Upgrades USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 155 75 230 Administration / Legal - 3 3 6 Construction Contracts - 500 1,300 1,800 Construction Mgmt - 125 200 325 Contingency - 150 260 410 CIP Overheads - 27 42 69 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 960$ $ 1,880 $ - $ 2,840 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 960 1,880 2,840 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 960$ $ 1,880 $ - $ 2,840 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The project focuses on enhancing the operational
efficiency and resilience of multiple lift stations within the City. Given that these stations were constructed around the same time, they share common upgrade needs in order to
maintain operational capabilities. The plan includes
necessary electrical updates, pump replacements, valve
improvements, and instrumentation upgrades for
integration with the City’s Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system . These updates will also
ensure that the lift stations are compat ible with the
operations at the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility
(ECWRF). ECWRF staff has identified the Outlet Mall lift station as a priority for rehabilitation.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-130

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Evaporative Cooler Replacement New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

ECWRF Evaporative Cooler Replacement
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 100 100 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 350 350
Construction Mgmt - -
Contingency - -
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - 450$ $ - $ - $ - 450$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 450 450
TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 450$ $ - $ - $ - 450$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
At the Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility,
evaporative coolers have been operating since
its establishment in 2009. These cooling
systems play a pivotal role in maintaining the
optimal conditions within the facility's Motor
Control Centers (MCCs), essential components
of the treatment plant.

However, these aging cooling systems have
become labor -intensive and expensive to
maintain. Currently, the evaporative coolers are
out of service due to malfunction and challenges
in sourcing replacement parts.

Given these challenges, Staff proposes
replacing the current system with a complete
unit similar to the efficient setup in the nearby
main electrical building , which has operated
seamlessly with minimal maintenance since its
installation.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-131

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Loading Evaluation and Treatment Capacity Improvements New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

ECWRF Loading Evaluation and Treatment Capacity Improvements USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 500 500 1,000 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - -
Construction Mgmt - -
Contingency - -
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - $ - 500$ 500$ $ - $ - $ 1,000 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 500 500 1,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - 500$ 500$ $ - $ - $ 1,000 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The ECWRF Loading Evaluation and Treatment Capacity
Improvements project will address the increased organic loading at the treatment plant, which now exceeds 80% of its current design capacity. To ensure the plant can handle additional loads, the City will initiate a capacity
improvement project, beginning with a capacity study to evaluate various treatment alternatives. Potential
improvements under consideration include modifications
to the existing Orbal system, the additio n of a third Orbal train, and the incorporation of primary filtration. This project aims to increase the plant’s organic loading capacity and ensure long -term sustainability and efficiency in
wastewater treatment for the City.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: TBD, Pending Study
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-132

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
ECWRF Parking Lot Construction New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

ECWRF Parking Lot Construction
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 150 10 160 Administration / Legal - 2 5 7 Construction Contracts - 1,550 1,550 Construction Mgmt - 50 50
Contingency - 150 150
CIP Overheads - 3 10 13 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - 155$ $ 1,775 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,930 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Waste Water Capital - 155 1,775 1,930 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - 155$ $ 1,775 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,930 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The area necessary for expansion of the tertiary recycled water treatment (C66401416) at the Ellis Creek Water
Recycling Facility (ECWRF) has displaced gravel
parking areas previously used by staff. While
temporary parking has been provided, a permanent,
safe, and accessible parking solution is necessary to
support facility operations and accommodate
increased needs. A site plan and architectural review
has been completed for a new parking area with 40
spaces in front of the Administration Building, and this project will add approximately 10 additional secure
spaces to the design. The remaining design and
construction work is expected to continue through FY
2026/27.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2025/26
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: Josh Minshall
Department Rep: Chelsea Thompson
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ________________
CIP-133

WASTEWATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-134

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

WATER UTILITY PROJECTS
FY 2025-2026
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FY 25-26

PROJECT SUMMARY
Fund 6790.67999
PROJECTS (dollars in $000) FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 C67502224 SCADA Upgrades CIP-136 140 - 140 - 100 100 1,180 - 1,520 100% E67502242 Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI) CIP-137 3,248 3,971 7,219 375 - - - - 7,594 100% E67502243 Aquifer Storage & Recovery
(ASR) Plan CIP-138 63 155 218 373 - - - - 591 100% C67502329 Potable Water Fill Stations
and Security Improvements CIP-139 41 1 42 180 235 - 535 - 992 100% C67402122 La Cresta Tank Replacement CIP-143 33 211 244 88 3,509 5,204 - - 9,045 100% C67502328 Hardin Tank Recoating CIP-145 147 1,582 1,729 161 - - - - 1,890 100% C67402433 Oak Hill Tank Replacement CIP-147 - - - - 295 295 4,180 4,180 8,950 100% New Washington Tank Recoating CIP-149 - - - - - - 2,415 - 2,415 100% New Water Tank Paving CIP-150 - - - - 405 - - - 405 100% New Water Booster Pump Station
Upgrades CIP-151 - - - - 125 500 750 - 1,375 100% C67502330
Water Services Replacement
St Francis and Various
Locations
CIP-152 26 21 47 18 1,467 659 - - 2,191 100% New Water Service Replacement -
Rainier Avenue CIP-153 - 156 156 496 - - - - 652 100% C67502327 Water Services Replacement
- Daniel Drive CIP-154 7 - 7 - 90 783 - - 880 100% Program Water Service Replacement
Program CIP-155 - - - - - 1,027 1,900 1,960 4,887 100% C67502326
Water Main Replacement
Howard Street and Various
Locations
CIP-156 16 745 761 3,025 - - - - 3,786 100% C67502332 Water Main Replacement- D
Street CIP-157 - 88 88 83 1,273 2,804 - - 4,248 100% C67502012 Water Main Replacement-
Bodega and North Webster CIP-158 - - - - 2,564 - - - 2,564 100% New Water Main Replacement-
Washington at Highway 101 CIP-159 - - - - - 110 515 - 625 100% Program Water Main Rehabilitation
and Replacement Program CIP-160 - - - - 3,590 4,279 5,118 2,918 15,905 100% Program Well Construction Program CIP-161 - - - - 925 - 925 - 1,850 100% New Well Treatment CIP-162 - - - - - 2,080 - - 2,080 100% New Pressure Reducing Valve
Resiliency Program CIP-163 - - - - 565 350 - - 915 100% New City-Owned Facilities
Backflow Preventer Upgrades CIP-164 - - - 25 200 - - 225 100% TOTAL $ 3,721 $ 6,930 $ 10,651 $ 4,799 $ 15,168 $ 18,391 $ 17,518 $ 9,058 $ 75,585 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 415$ $ 2,872 $ 3,287 $ 4,163 $ 7,774 $ 8,613 $ 5,804 $ 1,960 $ 31,601 Waste Water Capital - 30 30 12 - - - - 42
Future Bond - - - - 7,394 9,778 11,713 7,098 35,983 DWR Grant 524 6,787 7,311 648 - - - - 7,959 TOTAL 939$ $ 9,689 $ 10,628 $ 4,823 $ 15,168 $ 18,391 $ 17,517 $ 9,058 $ 75,585 Page
No.
% of
Project
Funded
(5 Years)
Total
Project
Estimate
Actual
Life to
Date thru
FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Projected Budgets
Budget
FY 25-26
Estimate
Life to
Date thru
FY 25
CIP-135

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SCADA Upgrades C67502224

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502224
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 1 1 100 100 90 291 Administration / Legal 1 1 1 Construction Contracts 137 137 800 937 Construction Mgmt - 80 80
Contingency - 200 200
CIP Overheads 1 1 10 11 TOTAL USES 140$ -$ 140$ $ - 100$ 100$ $ 1,180 $ - $ 1,520 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 141 141 100 100 1,179 1,520 TOTAL FUNDS 141$ -$ 141$ $ - 100$ 100$ $ 1,179 $ - $ 1,520 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will make upgrades to the City’s
Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA)
communication system which relays information from
the City’s water distribution network, including water
tanks, pump stations , and aqueduct turnouts, to the
Water Field Office (WFO). The SCADA system allows
operations staff to view and monitor important real-time information like pressures, flows , and tank levels. This project will also increase security and protect the City’s communication network meeting regulatory cyber
security requirements . System reliability has been
improved by installing a cellular-based network backup
and installing redundant equipment for all critical
infrastructure Ongoing evaluation will continue to
assess additional system needs and upgrades.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-136

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) E67502242

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

E67502242
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 36 30 66 66 Administration / Legal 17 25 42 42 Construction Contracts 3,191 3,533 6,724 335 7,059 Construction Mgmt 4 31 35 5 40 Contingency 317 317 35 352 CIP Overheads 35 35 35
TOTAL USES $ 3 ,248 3,971$ 7,219$ 375$ $$ $ $ - - - - $ 7 ,594 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 30 30 13 43 Waste Water Capital 30 30 12 42 DWR Grant- UMDR 482 6,652 7,134 375 7,509 TOTAL FUNDS 482$ 6,712$ 7,194$ 400$ $$ $ $ - - - - $ 7 ,594 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will upgrade the City’s 20,338 water meters from Automated Meter Reading (AMR) to Advanced Metering
Infrastructure (AMI) technology. AMI uses cellular
communications to automatically and regularly transmit water usage data directly to the City’s water operations software , eliminating the need for staff to manually ready meters each month. This technology will also empower our water customers to have access to real -time water usage data through an online customer portal or smartphone application, enabling enhanced water conservation , timely leak detection , and self -monitoring.

The project is funded through a combination of a state grant from the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and Petaluma water enterprise funds.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Lucas Pereira
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ___________________
CIP-137

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Plan E67502243

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

E67502243
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 63 20 83 83 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts 100 100 353 453 Construction Mgmt 35 35 35 Contingency - 20 20
CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES 63$ 155$ 218$ 373$ $$ $ $ - - - - 591$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 41 41 100 - 141 DWR Grant 42 135 177 273 - 450 TOTAL FUNDS 42$ 176$ 218$ 373$ $$ $ $ - - - - 591$ Projected Budgets
Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
Project Manager: Oriana Hart
Department Rep: Oriana Hart
Description and Justification
The Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) Plan will evaluate the feasibility of developing a groundwater banking program in Petaluma. This initiative will explore using ASR facilities to store the Russian River surface water supply as well as stormwater in the local groundwater basin. To better understand the feasibility, a preliminary ASR test will be conducted using an existing groundwater well. Study efforts will be closely coordinated with the Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency as well as other regional ASR studies . This will also help to inform the Integrated Water Master Plan as Petaluma continues to work towards enhancing the resiliency of our water supply. The feasibility study was launched in Spring 2023 and a pilot drawdown and injection project are anticipated to occur in 2025.

Funding for this project is supported with a state grant in collaboration with Petaluma Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

CIP-138

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Potable Water Fill Stations and Security Improvements C67502329

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502329
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 40 1 41 15 25 125 206 Administration / Legal - 5 10 15 Construction Contracts - 130 155 300 585 Construction Mgmt - 7 16 30 53 Contingency - 26 31 60 117 CIP Overheads 1 1 2 3 10 16 TOTAL USES 41$ 1$ 42$ 180$ 235$ $ - 535$ $ - 992$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 42 42 180 235 535 992 TOTAL FUNDS 42$ -$ 42$ 180$ 235$ $ - 535$ $ - 992$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will install three potable water fill stations to replace the current hydrant fill operations. The new stations will enhance security and provide more convenient access to potable water.

Equipped with advanced metering and secure login protocols, the fill stations will enable precise tracking of water consumption and ensure that only authorized users can access the facilities .

This technology-driven approach will ensure that water usage is accurately monitored, promoting responsible consumption.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
☒Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-139

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

CIP-140

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Distribution System Zone Map

CIP-141

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
La Cresta Tank Replacement C67402122

CIP-142

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
La Cresta Tank Replacement C67402122
Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)
C67402122
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 32 204 236 84 27 347 Administration / Legal 3 3 4 2 9
Construction Contracts - 2,236 3,354 5,590
Construction Mgmt - 335 503 838
Contingency - 894 1,342 2,236
CIP Overheads 1 4 5 15 5 25
TOTAL USES 33$ 211$ 244$ 88$ $ 3,509 $ 5 ,204 $ - $ - $ 9 ,045 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 33 211 244 88 - - 332
Future Bond - 3,509 5,204 8,713
TOTAL FUNDS 33$ 211$ 244$ 88$ $ 3,509 $ 5 ,204 $ - $ - $ 9 ,045 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project involves the construction of a new 1.0 million gallon (MG) potable water tank at the La Cresta tank site.

This new tank will replace the two existing steel tanks at the site, which are undersized, require substantial
rehabilitation, and are not compliant with the current seismic standards . During this project emergency
communication infrastructure at the site will also be
upgraded.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%
Start Date: FY 2019/20 – Summer 2020
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☒ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-143

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Hardin Tank Recoating C67502328

CIP-144

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Hardin Tank Recoating C67502328

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502328
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 143 16 159 159 Administration / Legal 3 3 1 4 Construction Contracts 1,223 1,223 136 1,359 Construction Mgmt 1 199 200 6 206 Contingency 135 135 15 150 CIP Overheads 3 6 9 3 12 TOTAL USES 147$ 1,582$ 1,729$ 161$ $$ $ $ - - - - $ 1 ,890 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 148 1,582 1,730 160 1,890 TOTAL FUNDS 148$ 1,582$ 1,730$ 160$ $$ $ $ - - - - $ 1 ,890 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project involves removing and replacing exterior and interior coating protection for the existing welded steel tank at the Hardin site. Work for this project will also include minor equipment repairs and replacements. This
work will not only enhance the tank's longevity but also bolster its resilience against seismic events and provide protection against corrosion through advanced cathodic
protection measures.

Hardin and Manor Tank are both a part of Petaluma’s
Zone 4 pressure zone , servicing the eastern portion of the city. Manor Tank was recently rehabilitated and will maintain consistent water pressure and ensure ample
storage capacity for fire protection during the
rehabilitation of Hardin Tank.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY2025/26
☐Climate First ☒Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-145

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Oak Hill Tank Replacement C67402433

CIP-146

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Oak Hill Tank Replacement C67402433

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67402433
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 275 275 550 Administration / Legal - 5 5 10 Construction Contracts - 3,500 3,500 7,000 Construction Mgmt - 200 200 400 Contingency - 450 450 900 CIP Overheads - 15 15 30 30 90 TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - 295$ 295$ $ 4,180 $ 4 ,180 $ 8 ,950 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Future Bond - 295 295 4,180 4,180 8,950 TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - 295$ 295$ 4,180 $ 4,180 $ 8,950 $ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The Oak Hill Tank Replacement project involves
removing and replacing a 2.0-million-gallon (MG)
tank at the Oak Hill tank site. The Oak Hill tank is
an important part of Petaluma’s Water
Distribution Zone 1 pressure zone and is
instrumental in providing both water equalization
and essential fire protection storage to
Petaluma's downtown area. The new tank will be
sized and designed to reflect the city's current
and future water system needs . The design and
construction of the Oak Hill tank will align with the
City’s Water System Master Plan and will
incorporate feedback gathered from community
outreach.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2029/30
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-147

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Washington Tank Recoating New

CIP-148

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Washington Tank Recoating New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Washington Tank Recoating
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 180 180 Administration / Legal - 5 5 Construction Contracts - 1,700 1,700 Construction Mgmt - 170 170
Contingency - 340 340
CIP Overheads - 20 20
TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $$ $ - -- $ 2,415 $ - $ 2,415 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Future Bond - 2,415 2,415
TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $$ $ - -- $ 2,415 $ - $ 2,415 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project involves removing and replacing exterior and interior coating protection for the two existing welded steel tanks as well as minor equipment repairs and replacements at the Washington site. These planned upgrades are not only geared towards enhancing structural integrity but also
towards fortifying the tanks against potential seismic events and corrosion through advanced seismic and cathodic
protection measures. By ensuring these protective measures are in place, this project aims to significantly prolong the operational lifespan of the Washington tanks.

These tanks are an essential part of the City's Zone 1
pressure zone . They service the majority of Petaluma,
including both eastern and western portions of the city.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2028/29
Estimated Completion: TBD
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-149

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Tank Paving New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Water Tank Paving
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 25 25 Administration / Legal - 5 5 Construction Contracts - 300 300 Construction Mgmt - 25 25
Contingency - 40 40
CIP Overheads - 10 10
TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - 405$ $$ $ - -- 405$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 405 405
TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - 405$ $$ $ - -- 405$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Petaluma’s nine water storage tanks, located
across seven sites throughout the city, play a critical role in maintaining consistent water supply,
ensuring fire protection capacity, and supporting
daily water needs. This project will repave and
improve access roads and surfaces around some
of these tank sites to enhance safety and
operational efficiency. Repaving will ensure safe
and reliable access for maintenance vehicles and
staff, protect infrastructure from erosion and
drainage issues, and reduce dust and debris that
could impact water quality. These improvements
reflect the City’s ongoing commitment to
maintaining and preserving its essential water
infrastructure.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-150

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

Water Booster Pump Station Upgrades New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Water Booster Pump Station Upgrades
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 25 125 150 Administration / Legal - 2 10 12 Construction Contracts - 75 300 650 1,025 Construction Mgmt - 10 50 60 120 Contingency - 10 10 30 50 CIP Overheads - 3 5 10 18 TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - 125$ 500$ 750$ $ - $ 1,375 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 125 500 750 1,375 TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - 125$ 500$ 750$ $ - $ 1,375 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Water pump stations are essential for maintaining adequate water pressure and ensuring consistent water distribution throughout Petaluma. They integrate into the larger water distribution system by facilitating the movement of water from its source or storage to various parts of the network.

This project will upgrade electrical, mechanical, and
communication equipment at various water pump stations
throughout Petaluma . Improvements are likely at the
Magnolia, McNear, Corona, and Frates pump stations.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-151

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Service Replacement – St. Francis and Various Locations C67502330

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502330
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 23 15 38 15 53 Administration / Legal 2 2 3 2 7 Construction Contracts - 1,149 522 1,671 Construction Mgmt - 141 60 201 Contingency - 169 73 242 CIP Overheads 3 4 7 6 4 17 TOTAL USES 26$ 21$ 47$ 18$ $ 1,467 659$ $$ - -$ 2 ,191 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 27 20 47 18 1,467 659 2,191 TOTAL FUNDS 27$ 20$ 47$ 18$ $ 1,467 659$ $$ - -$ 2 ,191 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project is part of the projected Water Service Replacement Program, addressing polybutylene water services installed in the 1970s and 1980s that are prone to failure. These “blue -tube” pipes become brittle over time, leading to leaks and fractures .

Replacements focus on reducing failures and associated
ongoing maintenance demands as the lines continue to age.

This project will replace water services along St. Francis Dr ive from South McDowell Boulevard through Caulfield Lane. Streets along this project area include Alderwood Court, Cottonwood Court, Ashwood Court, St. Andrew Court, Santa Ines Court, Santa Ines Way, Santa Clara Lane, San Rafael Drive, St.

Joseph Way, and San Juan Way.

This project will be closely coordinated with the planned sewer main replacement ( C66402556), urban recycled water system expansion (C66402555), and paving restoration (C16102537) projects along St. Francis Drive.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: Steve Worrell
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-152

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Service Replacement – Rainier Avenue C67502536

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502536
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 10 10 10 Administration / Legal 2 2 2 Construction Contracts 100 100 400 500 Construction Mgmt 10 10 30 40 Contingency 22 22 66 88 CIP Overheads 12 12 12
TOTAL USES $ - 156$ 156$ 496$ $$ $ $ - - - - 652$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 156 156 496 652 TOTAL FUNDS $ - 156$ 156$ 496$ $$ $ $ - - - - 652$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project is part of the Projected Water Service Replacement Program, addressing polybutylene water services installed in the 1970s and 1980s that are prone to failure. These “blue -tube” pipes become brittle over time, leading to leaks and fractures.

Replacements focus on r educing failures and ongoing
maintenance demands as the lines continue to age.

This project replaces water services along Rainier Ave between North McDowell Blvd and Sonoma Mountain Parkway.

This project will be closely coordinated with the planned urban recycled water system expansion ( C66402554) and paving restoration (C16102434) projects along Rainier Avenue.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Project Manager: George Howard
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-153

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Service Replacement - Daniel Drive C67502327

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502327
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 6 6 90 96 Administration / Legal - 5 5 Construction Contracts - 600 600 Construction Mgmt - 40 40
Contingency - 128 128
CIP Overheads 1 1 10 11 TOTAL USES $ 7 -$ 7$ $ - 90$ 783$ $$ - - 880$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 7 7 90 783 880 TOTAL FUNDS $ 7 -$ 7$ $ - 90$ 783$ $$ - - 880$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project is part of the projected Water Service Replacement Program, addressing polybutylene water services installed in the 1970s and 1980s that are prone to failure. These “blue-tube” pipes become brittle over time, leading to leaks and fractures.

Replacements focus on reducing failures and ongoing
maintenance demands as the lines continue to age .

Staff has identified Daniel Drive and the surrounding area as a neighborhood with a history of chronic maintenance issues and polybutylene water services that are prone to failure. This project will replace water services along Daniel Drive.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ____________
CIP-154

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Service Replacement Program

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Water Service Replacement Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 90 90 180 Administration / Legal - 9 14 74 97 Construction Contracts - 800 1,400 1,400 3,600 Construction Mgmt - 135 175 175 485 Contingency - 72 200 200 472 CIP Overheads - 11 21 21 53 TOTAL USES $ - $ - $ - - $ - $ 1,027 $ 1,900 $ 1 ,960 $ 4 ,887 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 1,027 1,900 1,960 4,887 TOTAL FUNDS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1 ,027 $ 1 ,900 $ 1,960 $ 4 ,887 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This program replaces polybutylene water services in high - priority areas. Water services installed throughout the 1970s and early 1980s included polybutylene "blue-tube" piping from the main to the water meter. Polybutylene piping is a type of plastic resi n pipe with fittings that scale, flake, and become brittle, causing micro -fractures that result in pipe failure.

Maintenance personnel continuously replace these old pipes as the service lines and saddle connections to the water main deteriorate. This program upgrades these water services and saddles to current standards to reduce maintenance costs and service interruptions. As specific areas are identified, the corresponding budget is removed from this program and a new capital improvement project is created.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: Ongoing
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-155

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Main Replacement – Howard Street and Various Locations C67502326

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502326
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 14 30 44 44 Administration / Legal 5 5 5 Construction Contracts 600 600 2,595 3,195 Construction Mgmt 10 10 30 40 Contingency 90 90 380 470 CIP Overheads 2 10 12 20 32 TOTAL USES 16$ 745$ 761$ $ 3 ,025 $$ $ $ - - - - $ 3 ,786 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 16 745 761 3,025 3,786 TOTAL FUNDS 16$ 745$ 761$ $ 3 ,025 $$ $ $ - - - - $ 3 ,786 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will replace aging and undersized water mains and water service lines along Howard Street and nearby streets .

These replacements will enhance the overall reliability of the water distribution system, ensuring consistent water supply to residents as well as the critical water pressure and volume required for effective firefighting in both residential and commercial areas.

This project will coordinate with the Howard Street sewer main replacement ( C66402348) and pavement restoration
(C16102435) projects to improve efficiency, reduce community disruption, and save costs. Aligning these efforts will help ensure the long -term reliability and functionality of this critical infrastructure.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2022/23
Estimated Completion: FY 2025/26
Project Manager: George Howard
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-156

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Main Replacement – D Street C67502332

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502332
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land 82 82 79 161 Administration / Legal 2 2 4 2 8 Construction Contracts - 1,065 2,497 3,562 Construction Mgmt - 66 100 166 Contingency - 133 199 332 CIP Overheads 4 4 7 8 19 TOTAL USES $ - 88$ 88$ 83$ $$ 12 ,,287034 $$ - -$ 4 ,248 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital 1 87 88 83 1,273 2,804 4,248 TOTAL FUNDS $ 1 87$ 88$ 83$ $$ 12 ,,287034 $$ - -$ 4 ,248 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will replace aging and undersized water mains and water service lines in the D Street area . These replacements will enhance the overall reliability of the water distribution system, ensuring consistent water supply to residents as well as the critical water pressure and flow volume required for effective firefighting in both residential and commercial areas.

This project will be closely coordinated with the planned sewer main replacement ( C66402350) and paving restoration
(C16102251) projects along D Street.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2024/25
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Kristin Arnold
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-157

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Main Replacement – Bodega and North Webster C67502012

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

C67502012
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate
Life to Date
thru FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - - - Administration / Legal - 6 6
Construction Contracts - 2,100 2,100 Construction Mgmt - 200 200
Contingency - 240 240
CIP Overheads - 18 18
TOTAL USES $$ - - -$ $ -$ 2,564 $$ $ - - -$ 2,564 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 2,564 2,564
TOTAL FUNDS $$ - - -$ $ -$ 2,564 $$ $ - - -$ 2,564 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will replace an aging water main located
along North Webster Street at Bodega Avenue. The
replacement will include a transition from the existing 8-inch water main to a broader 12-inch main to allow
for better hydraulic performance with the Paula Lane
and Mountain View water tanks in Zone 2 of the
water distribution system. The new water main will
reduce long-term maintenance costs, improve water
service flow rates, and provide enhanced fire
protection capabilities.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2026/27
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-158

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Main Replacement – Washington at Highway 101 New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Water Main Replacement- Washington at Highway 101
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 35 35 Administration / Legal - 3 3 Construction Contracts - 50 375 425 Construction Mgmt - 10 50 60 Contingency - 10 80 90 CIP Overheads - 2 10 12 TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $$ - - 110$ 515$ $ - 625$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 110 515 625 TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $$ - - 110$ 515$ $ - 625$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This project will replace aging water mains along Washington Street at Highway 101. These transmission water mains are vital infrastructure pipelines connecting the City’s potable water storage tanks to areas west of the freeway.

Installation of the new water pipeline will enhance system redundancy, as it establishes multiple water main crossings over the highway and connections from water tanks to the larger distribution system . Ultimately, these improvements help to ensure a reliable and well-maintained water distribution network for our community.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: FY 2028/29
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-159

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Water Main Rehabilitation & Replacement Program New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Water Main Rehabilitation and Replacement Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 75 75 75 75 300 Administration / Legal - 6 6 6 6 24 Construction Contracts - 2,984 3,600 4,500 2,300 13,384 Construction Mgmt - 150 170 150 150 620 Contingency - 350 400 360 360 1,470 CIP Overheads - 25 28 27 27 107 TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - $$ $ $ 3 4 ,5 ,2 5,2,9179019188$ 15,905 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Future Bond - 3,590 4,279 5,118 2,918 15,905 TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - $$ $ $ 3 4 ,5 ,2 5,2,9179019188$ 15,905 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This program is designed to address the challenges posed by undersized, aging, and failure -prone water mains in Petaluma that require replacement. This work will minimize the risk of catastrophic water main failures and reduce the loss of valuable potable water throughout the City’s water distribution network. The City’s Water Master Plan will guide the
identification and prioritization of pipelines for replacement , ensuring that Petaluma continues to provide reliable water services to its residents.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☒ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: ______________
CIP-160

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Well Construction Program

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Well Construction Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 150 150 300 Administration / Legal - 5 5 10 Construction Contracts - 550 550 1,100 Construction Mgmt - 90 90 180 Contingency - 125 125 250 CIP Overheads - 5 5 10 TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - 925$ $ - 925$ $ - $ 1,850 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 925 925 1,850 TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - 925$ $ - 925$ $ - $ 1,850 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This well construction program will continue efforts to expand Petaluma’s local water supply and enhance drought resiliency efforts. In line with Sonoma Water’s objectives, this initiative targets the identification and development of optimal well sites to increase Petaluma’s emergency and drought water supply capacity to 40% of its peak demand.

Currently, assessments for potential well locations are underway, prioritizing installations on the west side of Petaluma. As individual projects arise, the correspondi ng funding will be allocated accordingly, transitioning into dedicated capital improvement projects for their respective years. Strategically siting these wells throughout the City’s Water Distribution System Zones and establishing multiple connections to the water system, will ensure Petaluma has a robust and redundant water infrastructure, crucial for delivering potable water during both emergencies and
drought conditions.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2016/2017
Estimated Completion: Ongoing
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-161

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Well Treatment New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Well Treatment
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 150 150 Administration / Legal - 5 5 Construction Contracts - 1,500 1,500 Construction Mgmt - 150 150
Contingency - 250 250
CIP Overheads - 25 25
TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $$ - -$ 2 ,080 $$ - -$ 2 ,080 SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 2,080 2,080
TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $$ - -$ 2 ,080 $$ - -$ 2 ,080 Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
Petaluma has several permitted groundwater production
wells. Some of these wells currently need additional
treatment upgrades to ensure they consistently meet the required drinking water standards. In order to make sure these wells are up to quality standards, the City is looking to install treatment at wells that require removal of
constituents to meet drinking water standards. The project will include water quality analysis of some existing wells and undergo alternative analysis to determine appropriate treatment methods.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2027/28
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Oriana Hart
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☐ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _____________
CIP-162

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Pressure Reducing Valve Resiliency Program New

Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)

Pressure Reducing Valve Resiliency Program
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 65 65 Administration / Legal - -
Construction Contracts - 350 250 600 Construction Mgmt - 20 20 40 Contingency - 130 80 210 CIP Overheads - -
TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - 565$ 350$ $$ - - 915$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 565 350 915 TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - 565$ 350$ $$ - - 915$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
This program will upgrade and maintain the
pressure-reducing valves for the City’s water
distribution system located at various points along
the City’s main connection to the Sonoma Water
aqueduct. This program also ensures that the City’s
risk and resiliency planning upgrade is enforced
and satisfies Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) requirements.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%

Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: Dan Herrera
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready

Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-163

WATER UTILITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
City-Owned Facilities Backflow Preventer Upgrades New
Project Costs and Funding Sources
(Dollars in $000’s)
City-Owned Facilities Backflow Preventer Upgrades
USES (dollars in $000)
Actual Life
to Date
thru FY 24
Estimate
FY 24-25
Estimate Life
to Date thru
FY 25
Budget
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30
Total
Project
Estimate
Design/ Planning/ Environmental/ Land - 25 25
Administration / Legal - 5 5
Construction Contracts - 150 150
Construction Mgmt - 15 15
Contingency - 25 25
CIP Overheads - 5 5
TOTAL USES $ - -$ -$ $ - 25$ 200$ $$ -- 225$ SOURCES (dollars in $000)
Water Capital - 25 200 225
TOTAL FUNDS $ - -$ -$ $ - 25$ 200$ $$ -- 225$ Projected Budgets
Description and Justification
The project will evaluate and make upgrades to
water service backflow preventers, where needed,
at City-owned properties to ensure compliance with
new state regulations. These upgrades are
essential to meet California’s updated cross -
connection control policy standards, which aim to
protect the city’s water distribution system from
potential contamination sources. Each City property
and water service connection will undergo an
assessment to determine if its current backflow
prevention devices meet the new standards. Non -
compliant devices will be replaced, strengthening
Petaluma’s commitment to maintaining a safe and
reliable water supply for the community.

Funded percentage of total project cost: 100%
Start Date: FY 2026/27
Estimated Completion: FY 2027/28
Project Manager: To Be Determined
Department Rep: Dan Herrera
☐Climate First ☐Shovel Ready
Operating Impact:
☐ No significant impact
☐ Provide savings
☒ Maintenance costs included in operating budget
☐ Other: _______________
CIP-164

LEGISLATIVE

The final Adopted FY2025/26 budget will contain the Council approved ordinances in this section.

LEGISLATIVE

APPENDICES
FISCAL YEAR 2026
Allocation of Internal Service Funds and Administrative Overhead Charges Department/Division
Information
Technology
FY 2026
General
Service
FY 2026
Risk
FY 2026
Administrative
Charges
FY 2026
Total
Allocation
FY 2026
General -
City Council 14,082 14,082
City Attorney 129,903 14,094 143,997
City Clerk 57,733 9,005 66,738
City Manager 53,588 22,288 75,876
Economic Development 83,082 10,641 93,723
Finance 305,090 43,185 348,275
Human Resources 58,666 16,373 75,039
Community Development 44,973 10,061 55,034
Fire 298,169 281,786 579,955
Recreation 96,975 64,567 161,542
Police 1,107,749 478,513 1,586,262
Public Works 325,653 - 351,478 - 677,131
General Fund 2,561,581 - 1,316,073 - 3,877,654
Housing In-Lieu 26,325 744 4,557 31,626
Impact fees 8,986 239,529 248,515
CDBG 1,410 2,161 10,629 14,200
General Government Donations 33 661 694
Special Revenue 9,399 52,811 62,210
Street Maintenance 33,367 105,389 278,014 416,770 Landscape Assessment Districts 3,732 2,900 33,161 39,793 TOT 1,580 171,201 172,781
Governmental CIP - - 128,662 428,322 556,984
Special Revenue Funds 64,834 - 259,854 1,218,885 1,543,573 Airport Operation 47,327 28,436 1 77,748 2 53,511
Airport CIP 923 - 923
Building Services 225,408 33,738 3 70,131 6 29,277
Marina 22,493 31,037 67,707 1 21,237
Marina CIP - -
Transit Operations 197,423 36,575 1 84,225 4 18,223
Transit CIP 514 - 514
Wastewater Administration 961,427 172,524 1,389,161 2,523,112 Wastewater CIP 8 ,346 40,578 48,924
Water Administration 1,116,676 172,906 1,255,215 2,544,797 Water CIP 6,412 114,677 121,089
Storm Utility - - 5,606 34,376 39,982
Enterprise Funds 2,570,754 - 497,017 3,633,818 6,701,589 A-1

APPENDICES
FISCAL YEAR 2026
Allocation of Internal Service Funds and Administrative Overhead Charges

Department/Division
Information
Technology
FY 2026
General
Service
FY 2026
Risk
FY 2026
Administrative
Charges
FY 2026
Total
Allocation
FY 2026
Information Technology 34,651 34,651
Employee Benefits 2,909 2,909
Workers Compensation 12,588 22,319 344,562 379,469 General Services 15,729 2,538 18,267 Risk Management 51,871 - - - 51,871 Internal Service Funds 80,188 - 62,417 344,562 487,167 Successor Agency Housing 5,028 220,152 225,180 Successor Agency - - 2,705 37,903 40,608 Successor Agency Funds - - 7,733 258,055 265,788 TOTAL ALLOCATIONS 5,277,357$ -$ 2,143,094$ 5,455,320$ 12,875,771$ A-2

APPENDICES

FROM TO Budget PURPOSE
General Fund Waste Water 93,580 Waste Water Settlement General Fund Storm Utility 37,383 loan repayment General Fund Storm Utility 11,090 legal costs Waste Water settlement General Fund Storm Utility 480,000 operating costs General Fund Vehicle Replacement 500,000 vehicle replacements General Fund PW CIP 71,454 C16501412(LED Streetlight) - Interfund loan debt payment General Fund General Government CIP 369,651 e11502028 - General Plan General Fund General Government CIP 187,960 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 1,751,118
General Fund- Measure U General Fund 14,691,329 to cover deficit General Fund- Measure U 2021 Lease Revenue Bonds (Road Improvement Projects Measure U)366,671 Debt Service/ Roads/ Infrastructure General Fund- Measure U General Government CIP 250,000 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Fund- Measure U Parks CIP 150,000 c14502008 - Lucchesi Turf Field Replacement General Fund- Measure U Transit 180,000 Fare Free Public Transit General Fund- Measure U General Fund 70,000 Cost match for Sidewalk Program 15,708,000
Measure H Facilities CIP 2,605,000 c11202433 - Fire Station 1 -Seismic, Safety, and Privacy Upg 2,605,000
Commercial Linkage Fees General Government CIP 2,050 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Housing In-Lieu Housing Successor Ag 876,132 sar051150 - Successor Agency Housing Housing In-Lieu General Government CIP 2,235 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 878,367
Parkland Impact Fees Parks CIP 365,000 C14402215 - Lucchesi Skate Park City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 357,000
C11202433 - Fire Station 1 - Seismic, Safety, and Privacy Upgrades
City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 352,000
C11202434 - Fire Station 2 - Kitchen Replacement and
Renovations
City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 3,161,000 C11202431 - Petaluma Public Safety Facility City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 950,000 C11502435 - Temporary Fire Station City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 545,000 C11501911 - Fire Reserve Apparatus Storage and Paving City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 101,000 C114202430 - Petaluma Public Library Roof Replacement City Facilities Impact Fee Facilities CIP 438,000 C11202223 - City Facilities HVAC Replacements 5,904,000
Storm Drainage Impact Fees Surface Water CIP 1,896,000 C16502254 - Wilson Stormwtr Pump Station & Outfall Upg.

Storm Drainage Impact Fees Surface Water CIP 126,000 C16501931 - Storm Drain Trash Capture Device Pilot Storm Drainage Impact Fees Surface Water CIP 40,000 C16502431 - Corona Creek Flood Red & Habitat Enhancement 2,062,000
Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees Facilities CIP 305,000 c11202431 - Petaluma Public Safety Facility Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees Parks CIP 348,000 c14502114 - Lynch Creek Trail/ Crosstown Connector Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 44,000 C16102433 - Petaluma No SMART Station Access Imp.

Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 220,000 C16102536 - Safe Streets Quick Builds Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 160,000 C16102032 - Pedestrian Improvements Citywide Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 1,795,000 C16401824 - Caulfield Bridge Crosstown Connector Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 428,000 C16402252 - Pedestrian Bridge Renovations Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 265,000 C16102435 - Pavement Restoration - Howard Street Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 402,000 c16102434 - Pavement Restoration - Rainier Avenue Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 16,000 c16102251 - Pavement Restoration - D Street Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees PW CIP 175,000 C16102428 - Pavement Restoration - Caulfield Lane Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees Transit CIP 12,000 C65502211 - Bus Stop Improvements 4,170,000

TRANSFERS OUT
A-3

APPENDICES

FROM TO Budget PURPOSE
3% Admin Fee-08 General Government CIP 31,400 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government Grants Facilities CIP 637,000 c11202431 - Petaluma Public Safety Facility General Government Grants Facilities CIP 121,000 c11502015 - Electric Vehicle Chargers - City Facilities 758,000
CDBG Housing Successor Ag 5,800 sar051150 - Successor Agency Housing CDBG General Government CIP 3,560 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 9,360
Permanent Local Housing Authority (PLHA) General Government CIP 4,575 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Public Works Grants PW CIP 1,456,000
C16102433 - Petaluma North SMART Station Access
Improvements
Public Works Grants PW CIP 1,250,000 C16102536 - Safe Streets Quick Builds Public Works Grants Surface CIP 46,000
C16502431 - Corona Creek Flood Reduction and Habitat
Enhancement
2,752,000
Donations/Developer Contrib General Government CIP 280 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Abandoned Vehicle Abatement General Government CIP 3,730 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Asset Seizure General Fund 65,000 Public Safety Support Asset Seizure General Government CIP 30 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 65,030
SLESF General Fund 100,000 CAD/RMS system SLESF General Fund 100,000 Public Safety general support SLESF General Government CIP 610 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 200,610
Gas Tax Street Maintenance 3,273,370 97% of Highway Users Tax (HUT) revenue Street Maintenance PW CIP 250,000 C16102032 - Downtown Pedestrian ADA Improvements Street Maintenance Parks CIP 1,620,000 C14502114 - Lynch Creek Trail/ Crosstown Connector Street Maintenance PW CIP 688,000 c16102434 - Pavement Restoration - Rainier Avenue Street Maintenance PW CIP 24,000 C16102251 - Pavement Restoration - D Street Street Maintenance PW CIP 1,234,000 C16102428 - Pavement Restoration - Caulfield Lane Street Maintenance PW CIP 74,370 C16501412(LED Streetlight) - Interfund loan debt payment Street Maintenance General Government CIP 79,200 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 3,969,570
Landscape Assessment Districts General Government CIP 31,250 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Transient Occupancy Tax General Fund 2,350,000 general support Transient Occupancy Tax Parks CIP 200,000 E14402237 - Petaluma River Dredging Program Transient Occupancy Tax Parks CIP 200,000 c14402215 - Luchessi Skate Park Transient Occupancy Tax Parks CIP 309,484 c14402010 - Turning Basin Docks (Interfund loan) Transient Occupancy Tax General Government CIP 369,210 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 3,428,694
Petaluma Tourism Improvement District PW CIP 295,000 C16502430 - Downtown Public Restroom and Petaluma Tourism Improvement District General Government CIP 5,380 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 300,380
Measure M Parks Sales Tax Parks CIP 41,283 Interfund Loan- Tennis courts c14502011 Measure M Parks Sales Tax Parks CIP 343,000 C14502008 - Lucchesi Turf Field Replacement Measure M Parks Sales Tax General Government CIP 7,910 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Measure M Parks Sales Tax Parks CIP 49,000 Swim Center Facility Assmnt and Remodel (Phase 2) Measure M Parks Sales Tax Parks CIP 150,000 C14402215 - Lucchesi Skate Park 591,193

TRANSFERS OUT
A-4

APPENDICES
FROM TO Budget PURPOSE
Fairgrounds General Government CIP 2,060 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Successor Agency Housing General Government CIP 24,825 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Mobile Home Rent Program General Government CIP 25 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Airport Operating Airport CIP 71,000 C61502117 - Safety Zone Improvements by Drainage Airport Operating Airport CIP 346,000 C61502009 - Taxiway A Rehabilitation Airport Operating Airport CIP 100,000 C61502319 - South Taxilane B Rehabilitation Airport Operating Airport CIP 15,000 c61502420 - Airport Fuel Facility Improvements Airport Operating General Government CIP 135,300 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 667,300
Airport State AIP Grant Airport CIP 128,000 c61502009 - Taxiway A Rehabilitation Airport State AIP Grant Airport CIP 60,000 C61502319 - South Taxilane B Rehabilitation 188,000
Airport FAA Grant Airport CIP 898,000 c61502009 - Taxiway A Rehabilitation Airport FAA Grant Airport CIP 1,129,000 C61502319 - South Taxilane B Rehabilitation 2,027,000
Development Services General Government CIP 32,800 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Marina General Government CIP 74,400 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Transit General Government CIP 49,200 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Transit Transit CIP 9,000 C65202110 - Transit Admin Building Roof Overlay Transit Transit CIP 78,000 C65502211 - Bus Stop Improvements 136,200
Waste Water Capital Streets 415,000 pavement mgmt program Waste Water Capital General Government CIP 536,800 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Waste Water Capital WW CIP 2,284,000 C66501840 - Chemical System Upgrade - Ellis Creek Waste Water Capital WW CIP 307,000 C66401728 - Ellis Creek Hi Strength Waste Facilities Waste Water Capital WW CIP 83,000 C66402350 - Sewer Main Replacement- D Street Waste Water Capital WW CIP 1,555,000
C66402348 - Sewer Main Replacement - Howard Street and
Various Locations
Waste Water Capital WW CIP 14,259,000 C66502032 - PIPS Forcemain Replacement Waste Water Capital WW CIP 504,000 C66501930 - PIPS Upgrade and Pump Replacement Waste Water Capital WW CIP 294,000 C66501838 - Ellis Creek Outfall Replacement Waste Water Capital WW CIP 2,940,000 C66402453 - ECWRF Digester (#2) Repair Waste Water Capital WW CIP 2,815,000
C66402349 - Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility Oxidation Pond Flow Structure Rehab
Waste Water Capital WW CIP 18,000 C66402556 - Sewer Main Repl - St. Francis & Various Waste Water Capital WW CIP 155,000 ECWRF Parking Lot Construction Waste Water Capital Recycled Water CIP 1,181,000
C66501936 - Agricultural Recycled Water System Expansion – Adobe Road (Phase One)
Waste Water Capital Recycled Water CIP 136,000
Agricultural Recycled Water System Expansion - Adobe
Road (Phase Two)
Waste Water Capital Water CIP 12,000 E67502242 - Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) 27,494,800

TRANSFERS OUT
A-5

APPENDICES

FROM TO Budget PURPOSE
Water Capital Streets 572,000 pavement mgmt program Water Capital General Government CIP 414,000 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Water Capital Water CIP 180,000
C67502329 - Potable Water Fill Stations and Security
Improvements
Water Capital Water CIP 88,000 C67402122 - La Cresta Tank Replacement Water Capital Water CIP 13,000 E67502242 - Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Water Capital Water CIP 100,000 E67502243 - Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR) Plan Water Capital Water CIP 3,025,000
C67502326 - Water Main Replacement Howard Street and
Various Locations
Water Capital Water CIP 83,000 C67502332 - Water Main Replacement- D Street Water Capital Water CIP 160,000 C67502328 - Hardin Tank Recoating Water Capital Water CIP 18,000
C67502330 - Water Services Replacement St Francis and
Various Locations
Water Capital Water CIP 496,000 C67502536 - Water Service Replacement - Rainier Avenue 5,149,000
Storm Water Utility General Government CIP 24,905 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Storm Water Utility Parks CIP 410,000 c14501607 - Petaluma Community Baseball Field- Phase 1 434,905
Employee Benefits General Government CIP 11,020 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Services General Government CIP 6,565 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Information Technology General Government CIP 53,540 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Risk Management General Government CIP 26,215 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Vehicle and Equipment Replacement General Government CIP 15,710 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Workers' Compensation General Government CIP 14,785 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement Grand Total 85,224,127.00$

TRANSFERS OUT
A-6

APPENDICES

TO FROM Budget PURPOSE
General Fund Asset Seizure 65,000 Public Safety Support General Fund SLESF 100,000 CAD/RMS system General Fund SLESF 100,000 Public Safety general support General Fund Transient Occupancy Tax 2,350,000 general support General Fund General Fund- Measure U 14,691,329 to cover deficit General Fund General Fund- Measure U 70,000 Cost match for Sidewalk Program 17,376,329
Street Maintenance Gas Tax 3,273,370 97% of Highway Users Tax (HUT) revenue Street Maintenance Waste Water Capital 415,000 pavement mgmt program Street Maintenance Water Capital 572,000 pavement mgmt program 4,260,370
General Government CIP General Fund 369,651 e11502028 - General Plan General Government CIP General Fund 187,960 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP General Fund- Measure U 250,000 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Commercial Linkage Fees 2,050 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Housing In-Lieu 2,235 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP 3% Admin Fee-08 31,400 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP CDBG 3,560 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Permanent Local Housing Authority (PLHA) 4,575 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Donations/Developer Contrib 280 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Abandoned Vehicle Abatement 3,730 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Asset Seizure 30 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP SLESF 610 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Street Maintenance 79,200 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Landscape Assessment Districts 31,250 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Transient Occupancy Tax 369,210 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Petaluma Tourism Improvement District 5,380 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Measure M Parks Sales Tax 7,910 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Fairgrounds 2,060 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Successor Agency Housing 24,825 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Mobile Home Rent Program 25 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Airport Operating 135,300 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Development Services 32,800 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Marina 74,400 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Transit 49,200 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Waste Water Capital 536,800 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Water Capital 414,000 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Storm Water Utility 24,905 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Employee Benefits 11,020 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP General Services 6,565 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Information Technology 53,540 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Risk Management 26,215 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Vehicle and Equipment Replacement 15,710 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement General Government CIP Workers' Compensation 14,785 c73502401 - ERP- EDEN Replacement 2,771,181

TRANSFERS IN
A-7

APPENDICES

TO FROM Budget PURPOSE
Facilities CIP Measure H 2,605,000 c11202433 - Fire Station 1 - Seismic, Safety, and Privacy Upg Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 357,000 c11202433 - Fire Station 1 - Seismic, Safety, and Privacy Upg Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 352,000 C11202434 - Fire Station 2 - Kitchen Repl & Renovations Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 3,161,000 C11202431 - Petaluma Public Safety Facility Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 950,000 C11502435 - Temporary Fire Station Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 545,000 C11501911 - Fire Reserve Apparatus Storage and Paving Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 101,000 C114202430 - Petaluma Public Library Roof Repl Facilities CIP City Facilities Impact Fee 438,000 C11202223 - City Facilities HVAC Replacements Facilities CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 305,000 c11202431 - Petaluma Public Safety Facility Facilities CIP General Government Grants 637,000 c11202431 - Petaluma Public Safety Facility Facilities CIP General Government Grants 121,000 c11502015 - Electric Vehicle Chargers - City Facilities 9,572,000
Parks CIP General Fund- Measure U 150,000 c14502008 - Lucchesi Turf Field Replacement Parks CIP Parkland Impact Fees 365,000 C14402215 - Lucchesi Skate Park Parks CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 348,000 c14502114 - Lynch Creek Trail/ Crosstown Connector Parks CIP Street Maintenance 1,620,000 C14502114 - Lynch Creek Trail/ Crosstown Connector Parks CIP Transient Occupancy Tax 200,000 E14402237 - Petaluma River Dredging Program Parks CIP Transient Occupancy Tax 200,000 c14402215 - Luchessi Skate Park Parks CIP Transient Occupancy Tax 309,484 c14402010 - Turning Basin Docks (Interfund loan) Parks CIP Measure M Parks Sales Tax 41,283 Interfund Loan- Tennis courts c14502011 Parks CIP Measure M Parks Sales Tax 343,000 C14502008 - Lucchesi Turf Field Replacement Parks CIP Measure M Parks Sales Tax 49,000 Swim Center Facility Assmnt and Remodel Phase2 Parks CIP Measure M Parks Sales Tax 150,000 C14402215 - Lucchesi Skate Park Parks CIP Storm Water Utility 410,000 c14501607 - Petaluma Comm Baseball Field- Phase 1 4,185,767
PW CIP General Fund 71,454 C16501412(LED Streetlight) - Interfund loan debt pymnt PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 44,000 C16102433 - Petaluma North SMART Station Access Impr PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 220,000 C16102536 - Safe Streets Quick Builds PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 160,000 C16102032 - Pedestrian Improvements Citywide PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 1,795,000 C16401824 - Caulfield Bridge Crosstown Connector PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 428,000 C16402252 - Pedestrian Bridge Renovations PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 265,000 C16102435 - Pavement Restoration - Howard Street PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 402,000 c16102434 - Pavement Restoration - Rainier Avenue PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 16,000 c16102251 - Pavement Restoration - D Street PW CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 175,000 C16102428 - Pavement Restoration - Caulfield Lane PW CIP Street Maintenance 250,000 C16102032 - Downtown Pedestrian ADA Improvements PW CIP Street Maintenance 688,000 c16102434 - Pavement Restoration - Rainier Avenue PW CIP Street Maintenance 24,000 C16102251 - Pavement Restoration - D Street PW CIP Street Maintenance 1,234,000 C16102428 - Pavement Restoration - Caulfield Lane PW CIP Street Maintenance 74,370 C16501412(LED Streetlight) - Interfund loan debt pymnt PW CIP Petaluma Tourism Improvement District 295,000 C16502430 - Downtown Public Restroom & Beautification PW CIP Public Works Grants 1,456,000 C16102433 - Petaluma No SMART Station Access Impr PW CIP Public Works Grants 1,250,000 C16102536 - Safe Streets Quick Builds 8,847,824
Surface Water CIP Storm Drainage Impact Fees 1,896,000
C16502254 - Wilson Stormwater Pump Station & Outfall
Upgrades
Surface Water CIP Storm Drainage Impact Fees 126,000 C16501931 - Storm Drain Trash Capture Device Pilot Surface Water CIP Storm Drainage Impact Fees 40,000
C16502431 - Corona Creek Flood Reduction and Habitat
Enhancement
Surface Water CIP Public Works Grants 46,000
C16502431 - Corona Creek Flood Reduction and Habitat
Enhancement
2,108,000

TRANSFERS IN
A-8

APPENDICES

TO FROM Budget PURPOSE
2021 Lease Revenue Bonds (Road Improvement Projects Measure U)General Fund- Measure U 366,671 Debt Service/ Roads/ Infrastructure Housing Successor Ag Housing In-Lieu 876,132 sar051150 - Successor Agency Housing Housing Successor Ag CDBG 5,800 sar051150 - Successor Agency Housing 881,932
Airport CIP Airport Operating 71,000 C61502117 - Safety Zone Impr by Drainage Channel Airport CIP Airport Operating 346,000 C61502009 - Taxiway A Rehabilitation Airport CIP Airport Operating 100,000 C61502319 - South Taxilane B Rehabilitation Airport CIP Airport Operating 15,000 c61502420 - Airport Fuel Facility Improvements Airport CIP Airport State AIP Grant 128,000 c61502009 - Taxiway A Rehabilitation Airport CIP Airport State AIP Grant 60,000 C61502319 - South Taxilane B Rehabilitation Airport CIP Airport FAA Grant 898,000 c61502009 - Taxiway A Rehabilitation Airport CIP Airport FAA Grant 1,129,000 C61502319 - South Taxilane B Rehabilitation 2,747,000
Transit General Fund- Measure U 180,000 Fare Free Public Transit Transit CIP Traffic Mitigation Impact Fees 12,000 C65502211 - Bus Stop Improvements Transit CIP Transit 9,000 C65202110 - Transit Admin Building Roof Overlay Transit CIP Transit 78,000 C65502211 - Bus Stop Improvements 99,000
Waste Water General Fund 93,580 Waste Water Settlement WW CIP Waste Water Capital 2,284,000 C66501840 - Chemical System Upgrade - Ellis Creek WW CIP Waste Water Capital 307,000 C66401728 - Ellis Creek Hi Strength Waste Facilities WW CIP Waste Water Capital 83,000 C66402350 - Sewer Main Replacement- D Street WW CIP Waste Water Capital 1,555,000 C67502326 - Water Main Repl Howard St & Various WW CIP Waste Water Capital 14,259,000 C66502032 - PIPS Forcemain Replacement WW CIP Waste Water Capital 504,000 C66501930 - PIPS Upgrade and Pump Replacement WW CIP Waste Water Capital 294,000 C66501838 - Ellis Creek Outfall Replacement WW CIP Waste Water Capital 2,940,000 C66402453 - ECWRF Digester (#2) Repair WW CIP Waste Water Capital 2,815,000
C66402349 - Ellis Creek Water Recycling Facility
Oxidation Pond Flow Structure Rehab
WW CIP Waste Water Capital 18,000
C66402556 - Sewer Main Replacement - St. Francis and
Various Locations
WW CIP Waste Water Capital 155,000 ECWRF Parking Lot Construction 25,214,000
Recycled Water CIP Waste Water Capital 1,181,000
C66501936 - Agricultural Recycled Water System
Expansion – Adobe Road (Phase One)
Recycled Water CIP Waste Water Capital 136,000
Agricultural Recycled Water System Expansion - Adobe
Road (Phase Two)
1,317,000
Water CIP Waste Water Capital 12,000 E67502242 - Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Water CIP Water Capital 180,000
C67502329 - Potable Water Fill Stations and Security
Improvements
Water CIP Water Capital 88,000 C67402122 - La Cresta Tank Replacement Water CIP Water Capital 13,000 E67502242 - Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) Water CIP Water Capital 100,000 E67502243 - Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR) Plan Water CIP Water Capital 3,025,000 C67502326 - Water Main Repl Howard St & Various Water CIP Water Capital 83,000 C67502332 - Water Main Replacement- D Street Water CIP Water Capital 160,000 C67502328 - Hardin Tank Recoating Water CIP Water Capital 18,000 C67502326 - Water Main Repl Howard St & Various Water CIP Water Capital 496,000 C67502536 - Water Service Repl - Rainier Avenue 4,175,000

TRANSFERS IN
A-9

APPENDICES

TO FROM Budget PURPOSE
Storm Utility General Fund 37,383 loan repayment Storm Utility General Fund 11,090 legal costs Waste Water settlement Storm Utility General Fund 480,000 operating costs 528,473
Vehicle Replacement General Fund 500,000 vehicle replacements Grand Total 85,224,127.00$

TRANSFERS IN
A-10

APPENDICES

FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 General Enterprise Other

DEPARTMENT POSITION

Authorized
& Funded

Authorized
& Funded Fund Funds Funds
City Clerk
City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy City Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Records Coordinator - Limited Term 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total City Clerk 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00
City Attorney
City Attorney 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Attorney 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.00
Legal Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total City Attorney 4.50 4.50 5.00 5.00 0.00 0.00
City Manager
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst. City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst to City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Exec. Asst. to City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Climate Action Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total City Manager 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 0.00
Community Development
Building Inspector I/II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.20
Permit Technician 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Chief Bldg Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Chief Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Director of Community Development 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.34 Assistant Director of Community Development 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.25 0.75 Management Analyst I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.34
Plans Examiner 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Building Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.45 Code Enforcement Officer 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.45
Senior Planner 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Housing Manager 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Housing Specialist 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Community Development 16.00 17.00 17.00 3.47 10.78 2.75 ------------ Allocation--------------
Full Time Positions - Authorized and Funded - Allocation by Home Department FY 2025-26 Allocation by Home Department
A-11

APPENDICES

FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 General Enterprise Other

DEPARTMENT POSITION

Authorized
& Funded

Authorized
& Funded Fund Funds Funds
Economic Development & Open Government
Communications Program Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Data and Systems Manager 1.00 1.00 0.00
Director of Economic Develop & Open Gov 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 Info Tech Specialist 1/2/3 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Information Tech Technician 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Information Tech Analyst 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Information Tech Analyst 0.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Information Technology Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Geographic Info Systems Administrator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50
Business Systems Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Economic Development & Open Gov. 12.00 13.00 12.00 2.00 0.00 10.00 Finance
Director of Finance 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy City Manager / Director of Finance 1.00 1.00 0.00 Assistant Finance Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accountant (Fixed Term) 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Finance Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst I/II 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accounting Assistant I/II 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Accounting Assistant I/II (Fixed Term) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Accounting Technician 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Accounting Technician (Fixed Term) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Revenue Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finance and Accounting Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Finance 16.00 21.00 21.00 16.00 0.00 5.00
Full Time Positions - Authorized and Funded - Allocation by Home Department FY 2025-26 Allocation by Home Department
------------ Allocation--------------
A-12

APPENDICES

FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 General Enterprise Other

DEPARTMENT POSITION

Authorized
& Funded

Authorized
& Funded Fund Funds Funds
Fire
Administrative Technician Conf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Emergency Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.40 0.30
Emergency Medical Srvcs Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fire Battalion Chief 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Fire Captain 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00
Fire Engineer/Fire Eng Paramedic 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Fire Inspector 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Fire Marshal 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Fire Marshall 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Firefighter 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Firefighter/Paramedic 27.00 27.00 27.00 27.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Fire 69.00 69.00 69.00 67.30 0.40 1.30
Human Resources & Risk Management
Director Human Resources 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.50
Senior Human Resources Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HR Assistant Conf 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Analyst I/II 3.80 4.80 4.80 1.80 1.00 2.00 Human Resources Analyst I/II (fixed term) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Specialist Conf (fixed term) 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Risk Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Human Resources & Risk Manangement 7.80 10.80 10.80 4.30 1.00 5.50 Full Time Positions - Authorized and Funded - Allocation by Home Department FY 2025-26 Allocation by Home Department
------------ Allocation--------------
A-13

APPENDICES

FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 General Enterprise Other

DEPARTMENT POSITION

Authorized
& Funded

Authorized
& Funded Fund Funds Funds
Parks & Recreation / Community Services
Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Director of Parks and Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Facilities Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.30 0.50
Facilities Technician I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.20
Management Analyst I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Office Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Superintendent of Parks and Facilities 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.20 0.30 Parks Maintenance Crew Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parks Maintenance Lead Worker 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Parks Maintenance Worker I/II 8.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 1.00
Recreation Coordinator 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 1.00
Recreation Supervisor 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Senior Facilities Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.70 0.30 1.00 Total Parks & Recreation 25.00 29.00 29.00 24.20 1.00 3.80 Police
Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Administrative Assistant Confidential 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Officer 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Community Service Officer 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Evidence Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst I/II Limited Term 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Management Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Property Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Lieutenant 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Police Officer 54.00 54.00 54.00 54.00
Police Records Technician I/II 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Parking Enforcement Officer 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Police Records/Evidence Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Sergeant 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00
Police Technical Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Police Training Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Public Safety Communications Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Public Safety Dispatcher 11.60 11.60 11.60 11.60
Community Engagement Liaison 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Police 103.60 103.60 102.60 101.60 0.00 1.00
Full Time Positions - Authorized and Funded - Allocation by Home Department FY 2025-26 Allocation by Home Department
------------ Allocation--------------
A-14

APPENDICES
FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 General Enterprise Other

DEPARTMENT POSITION

Authorized
& Funded

Authorized
& Funded Fund Funds Funds
Public Works
Administrative Assistant 3.50 3.00 3.00 0.95 1.70 0.35
Administrative Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.65 0.05
Administrative Technician 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.60 1.64 0.76 Airport & Marina Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Airport Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Engineer II 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.88 1.12
Assistant Operations Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.20 0.80
Assistant. PW & Utilities Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.35 0.05 Associate Civil Engineer 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.32 1.68
City Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.20 0.20
Deputy Director of Operations 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.15 0.80 Director of Public Works 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.13 0.57
Director of Public Works & Utilities 0.50 0.00 0.00
Engineering Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.56
Engineering Tech II 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.60 0.20 0.20
Equipment Mechanic 2.00 3.00 3.00 0.70 2.15 0.15
Equipment Mechanical Lead Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.15 0.10 Management Analyst I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Project Manager 1.00 0.00 0.00
Project Manager I/II 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.20 1.05 0.75
Public Works Crew Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.10 0.90
Senior Civil Engineer 6.00 6.00 6.00 2.64 3.36
Senior Engineering Technician 3.00 2.00 2.00 0.35 0.44 1.21 Senior Management Analyst 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.10 1.80 0.10 Senior Project Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.56
Senior Public Works Inspector 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.15 1.25 0.60 Senior Traffic Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 0.35
Senior Transit Planner 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Street Maintenance Lead Wkr 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Street Maintenance Worker I/II 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Street Maintenance Worker III 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Traffic Signal Light Technician II 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Transit Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Transit Specialist 1.00 0.00 0.00
Transit Planner I/II 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Public Works 58.00 61.00 64.00 9.20 23.58 31.22
Full Time Positions - Authorized and Funded - Allocation by Home Department FY 2025-26 Allocation by Home Department
------------ Allocation--------------
A-15

APPENDICES

FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 General Enterprise Other

DEPARTMENT POSITION

Authorized
& Funded

Authorized
& Funded Fund Funds Funds
Water Resouces & Utilities
Administrative Assistant 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.95
Administrative Technician 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst. Operations Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Asst. Utility System Operator 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Business Systems Analyst (Fixed Term) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Environmental Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Operations 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.05
Director of Public Works & Utilities 0.50 0.00 0.00
Director of Water Resources & Utilities 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Electrical / Instrumentation Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Electrical Maintenance Worker II 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Engineering Tech II 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.05
Environmental Compliance Inspector 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Environmental Services Analyst 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Environmental Services Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Environmental Services Tech 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Geographic Information System Analyst 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Laboratory Analyst 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Laboratory Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mechanical and Electrical Maint Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Plant Mechanic 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Administrative Assistant 3.50 1.00 1.00 0.05 0.95 Senior Environmental Services Analyst 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Laboratory Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Management Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Plant Mechanic 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Utility Service Lead Worker 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Utility Service Worker I/II 16.00 13.00 13.00 13.00
Utility Service Worker III 2.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Utility Services Crew Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Utility Supervisor 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Utility System Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Utility Technician 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Water Recycling Plant Lead Operator 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Water Recycling Plant Operations Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Recycling Plant Operator II/III 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Water Resources and Conservation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Water Service Rep Lead Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Water Service Representative 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Total Water Conservation & Utilities 72.00 77.00 78.00 0.10 77.80 0.10 Total Position Summary 392.90 414.90 417.40 242.17 114.56 60.67 ------------ Allocation--------------
Full Time Positions - Authorized and Funded - Allocation by Home Department FY 2025-26 Allocation by Home Department
A-16

APPENDICES
FY 26 Additional (New) Proposed Positions by Department

Department Division FTE Count Position Funding Source
PW C ity Engineering 1 Engineering Tech I/II General Fund / Non General Fund PW Safe Streets & Mobility 1 Admin Tech Non General Fund PW Safe Streets & Mobility 1 Senior Transit Planner Non General Fund PW C IP 1 *Principal Engineer (carry forward from FY25) Non General Fund Water & Utilities Environmental Services 1 *Lead Environmental C ompliance Inspector Non General Fund Water & Utilities Water Operations 1 Sr. Management Analyst Non General Fund C ity Attorney 0.5 Assistant C ity Attorney General Fund * New positions are subject to HR review and position titles may change Note: These positions have been included in the FTE schedule A-17

APPENDICES

A-18

Petaluma City CouncilMay 5, 2025

Petaluma City Council
May 5, 2025