Agenda packet — Pico Rivera City Council, June 27, 2023 (part 1 of 3)

*Commissioners receive a $30.00 stipend per each meeting held and attended. .

Tuesday, June 27, 2023
Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Parks and Recreation Community Room
6767 Passons Boulevard
Next Resolution No. 7288
Next Ordinance No. 1173
Next Agreement No. 23-2205
Successor Agency to PRRA
Next Resolution No. SA-23-27
Next Ordinance No. SA-01
Next Agreement No. S23-006
Housing Assistance Agency
Next Resolution No. HA-107
Next Ordinance No. HA-16
Water Authority
Next Resolution No. 23-36
Next Ordinance No. 23-01
Next Agreement No. 23-74
Public Financing Authority
Next Resolution No. PFA-23-13
ROLL CALL:

Mayor/Chairman/President:

Erik Lutz
Mayor Pro Tempore/Vice Chairman/Vice President:

Andrew C. Lara
Councilmembers/Directors/Commissioners:

Gustavo V. Camacho
John R. Garcia
Dr. Monica Sanchez
INVOCATION:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S):
• Proclamation – Parks and Recreation Month
IF YOU PLAN TO SPEAK DURING PUBLIC COMMENT VIA ZOOM PLEASE JOIN IN 30 MINUTES PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING @ 6:00 p.m.

ZOOM REGISTRATION IN ADVANCE FOR THIS MEETING IS REQUIRED. After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

ZOOM INFORMATION BELOW:
https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZYkcOGrrzorGd1ZtNnxF5wavDyZrQ7QPWoz

PLEASE TURN OFF OR SILENCE CELL PHONES WHILE MEETING IS IN SESSION

AND PLEASE REFRAIN FROM TEXTING DURING THE MEETING
**************************************************************************************************** In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Pico Rivera is committed to providing reasonable accommodations for a person with a disability. Please call the City Clerk’s office at (562) 801-4389, if special accommodations are necessary and/or if information is needed in an alternative format. Special requests must be made in a reasonable amount of time in order that accommodations can be arranged (within 24 to 48 hours’ notice).

Meeting jointly and regularly with the Pico Rivera Successor Agency to the Pico Rivera Redevelopment Agency (as needed); Pico Rivera *Housing Assistance Agency (as needed); Pico Rivera Water Authority (as needed); and Public Financing Authority (as needed) 06-27-2023 Agenda City Council

Page 2 of 7 ends

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON ANY LISTED AGENDA ITEMS OR NONAGENDA ITEMS, PLEASE FILL OUT A GREEN PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST FORM

AND PROVIDE IT TO THE STAFF MEMBER AT THE BACK TABLE BEFORE THE MEETING STARTS.

When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and city of residency for the record. You have three (3) minutes to make your remarks. In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2, members of the City Council may only: 1) respond briefly to statements made or questions posed by the public; 2) ask a question for clarification; 3) provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information; 4) request staff to report to the City Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter raised by the public; and 5) direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.

City Council members cannot comment on items that are not listed on a posted agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS:

All items listed on the Consent Calendar may be acted on by a single motion without separate discussion. Any motion relating to a Resolution or Ordinance shall also waive the reading of the titles in full and include its adoption as appropriate. If discussion or separate vote on any item is desired by a Councilmember or staff, that item may be pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

City Council:

1. Minutes:
• City Council regular meeting June 13, 2023.

Recommendation: Approve

2. 19th Warrant Register of the 2022-2023 Fiscal Year. (700) Check Numbers: 291929-292069
Special Check Numbers: 12124
Recommendation: Approve

3. Approve a Resolution Opposing the Recommendation by the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission Regarding the Mandatory Rotation of Deputies.

Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution opposing the recommendation by the Special Counsel to the Los Angeles County Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission calling for the mandatory rotation of all patrol deputies; and

2. Direct the City Manager to prepare a letter that will be signed by all City Council members and sent to the appropriate agencies and elected officials.

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE

RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE SHERIFF

CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT COMMISSION REGARDING THE MANDATORY

ROTATION OF SHERIFF PATROL DEPUTIES
06-27-2023 Agenda City Council

Page 3 of 7 ends

4. Adoption of Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, Approval of the Operating and Capital Budget for Fiscal Year 2024-25, and Approval of Updated Reserve Policies. (700) Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 operating budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program;

2. Approve the FY 2024-25 operating and capital budget; and

3. Approve a resolution adopting updated General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies.

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, RENEWING GENERAL FUND

POLICIES WITH RESERVE POLICIES FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND

THE PICO RIVERA INNOVATIVE MUNICIPAL ENERGY ENTERPRISE
FUND

5. Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project (CIP No. 21280), Federal Project No.

ATPL-5351 (032) – Award Contract. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Award a construction contract for a not-to-exceed amount of $9,820,083 to Griffith Company for the Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project, Federal Project No. ATPL-5351 (032), CIP No. 21280; and execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney;

2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders, as needed, in an amount not-to-exceed $982,008, (approximately 10% of the total contract amount) for construction contingency;

3. Approve Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement No. 18- 1844 with BKF Engineers for a fee not-to-exceed $125,129;

4. Amend fiscal year (FY) 2022-23 adopted budget by appropriating $1,200,000 in Measure W (Fund 209) to Account No. 209.70.7300.54500- 21280 from the Measure W Fund 209 balance;

5. Amend FY 2022-23 adopted budget by transferring $700,000 from CIP No. 50048 (Residential Resurfacing Program – Overlay & Reconstruction) to CIP No. 21280 in COPS Funds (Fund 305) (from 305.70.7300.54500-50048 to 305.70.7300.54500-21280);

6. Amend FY 2022-23 adopted budget by transferring $600,000 from CIP No. 21331 (Telegraph Road Traffic Enhancements Project Phase II) to CIP No. 21280 in SB1 Funds (Fund 202) (from 202.70.7300.54500-21331 to 202.70.7300.54500-21280);

7. Amend FY 2022-23 adopted budget by transferring $810,503 from the General Fund (Fund 100) to the Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Fund (Fund 400). Subsequently, these funds will be appropriated to Account No. 400.70.7300.54500-21280. These funds are related to proceeds from a class action settlement for possible contamination to waterways, including 06-27-2023 Agenda City Council

Page 4 of 7 ends

stormwater. The City intends to utilize this fund to address the needs of this critical CIP; and

8. Amend FY 2022-23 adopted budget by transferring $289,497 in Landscaping an Lighting District (LLD) (Fund 230) to the General Fund (Fund 100), and then transfer from the General Fund to CIP Fund, and appropriate it to Account No. 400.70.7300.54500-21280. The City intends to utilize eligible resources in the LLD fund to address the needs of this critical CIP.

Agreement No. _______ Agreement No. 18-1844-4

6. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Cascadia Consulting Group for the Development of a Climate Action Plan. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Cascadia Consulting Group (Cascadia) to develop a Climate Action Plan for an amount not-to-exceed $149,935, and execute the agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney; and

2. Appropriate $50,000 from the Unassigned General Fund Balance to Account No. 100.11.1111-54500-6770.

Agreement No. ________

7. City Hall Electric Vehicle Charging Station Project (CIP No. 50010) – Award Contract. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the City Hall Electric Vehicle Charging Station Project, CIP No. 50010;

2. Award a construction contact, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for a not-to-exceed amount of $160,710 to Reliable Monitoring Services for the City Hall Electric Vehicle Charging Station Project, CIP No. 50010;

3. Authorize the City Manager to process change orders in an amount not-toexceed 10% of the total project amount, as needed, up to $16,071 for construction contingency;

4. Amend the fiscal year 2022-23 adopted budget by appropriating an additional $75,000 from Fund 200 to Account No. 200.70.7300.54500- 50010; and

5. Approve the Notice of Exemption (NOE) for the subject project and authorize the City Clerk to file the NOE with the County Recorder, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Agreement No. ________

8. Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 09-1095 with Nationwide Environmental Services For Citywide Graffiti Removal Services. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve Amendment No. 4 to Agreement No. 09-1095 with Nationwide Environmental Services (NES) for Citywide Graffiti Removal Services, in an amount not-to-exceed $341,749 in a form approved by the City Attorney. 06-27-2023 Agenda City Council

Page 5 of 7 ends

Agreement No. 09-1095-4

9. Approve Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. 18-1807 with S&S LaBarge Golf, Incorporated for Pico Rivera Golf Course Management Services. (500) Recommendation:

1. Approve Amendment No. 6 to Agreement No. 18-1807 with S&S LaBarge Golf, Inc. for Pico Rivera Golf Course management services;

2. Approve additional appropriations for fiscal year (FY) 2022-23 in the amount of $80,000 to pay for utilities and payroll;

3. Authorize S&S LaBarge to incur outside reimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,561,212 (excluding management fees) from the FY 2023-24 budget; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to sign any documents related to Amendment No. 6.

Agreement No. 18-1807-6

10. Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 21-2056 with Flock Group, Inc. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 21- 2056 with Flock Group Inc. (Flock Safety) in a form approved by the City Attorney for the ongoing licensing fees for maintenance and operating costs related to the 36 Automated License Plate Reader cameras installed by Flock Safety, in an amount not-to-exceed $450,000 for a 5-year period.

Agreement No. 21-2056-1

11. Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement No. 19-1905 with John L. Hunter and Associates. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement No. 19- 1905 with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., to extend the term of the agreement for two (2) years for a not-to-exceed amount of $149,998.

Agreement No. 19-1905-2

12. Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 19-1887 with Kimley-Horn for the Washington and Rosemead Boulevards Transit-Oriented Development Specific Plan. (500)
Recommendation:

1. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 19- 1887 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) in the amount of $160,196 for the development of the Washington and Rosemead Boulevards Gold Line Eastside Extension Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan; and

2. Authorize the appropriation of $160,196 from the Economic Sustainability Fund (F255) for the TOD Specific Plan project; and
06-27-2023 Agenda City Council

Page 6 of 7 ends

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Agreement No. 19-1887-1

13. Funding Source Correction for Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 23-2155 – Pico Rivera Youth Center Renovation Project CIP No. 50034. (500) Recommendation:

1. Approve a funding source change for Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 23-2155 with Dahlin Group, Inc. to provide Architect/Engineer (A-E) services for design and construction support of the Youth Center Renovation Project, (CIP No. 50034) from Account No. 699.73.7300.54500-50034 to Account No. 280.70.7300-54500.

14. Authorize the Purchase of a Mobile Vehicle Lift Station System for the Public Works Maintenance Division. (700)
Recommendation:

1. Authorize the City Manager to approve the purchase of a mobile column lift station system for the Public Works Maintenance Division.

15. Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of May 31, 2023.

Recommendation: (700)

1. Receive and file the Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of May 31, 2023.

16. Appropriate Funds from the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) Senate Bill (SB) 1383 Local Assistance Grant.

Recommendation: (700)

1. Approve an appropriation of $90,036 from the Cal Recycle Fund and amend the FY 2022-23 budget for Account No. 671.11.1110-54400 (Professional Services) by $90,036.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
REGULAR AGENDA:

17. Approval of City Manager Employment Agreement. (500) Recommendation:

1. Approve the employment agreement with Steve Carmona reconfirming his continued service as City Manager.

Agreement No. ________

CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS
GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234

REPORTS, NEW BUSINESS, OLD BUSINESS)
CLOSED SESSION: None
06-27-2023 Agenda City Council

Page 7 of 7 ends

ADJOURNMENT:

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Cynthia Ayala, Jr. Deputy City Clerk, for the City of Pico Rivera, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing notice was posted at the Pico Rivera City Hall bulletin board, Pico Rivera website www.picorivera.org, Parks and Recreation Office, Pico Rivera Post Office and Parks: Smith, Pico and Rivera which are available for the public to view on this 22nd, day of June 2023.

Dated this 22nd, day of June 2023.

Cynthia Ayala
Jr. Deputy City Clerk
SB343 NOTICE
In compliance with and pursuant to the provisions of SB343 any public writing distributed by the City Clerk to at least a majority of the City Council Members regarding any item on this regular meeting agenda will be available on the City’s website.

STATEMENT REGARDING DECORUM AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
If you wish to speak at the time set aside for public comments, the City Council has established the following standards and Rules of Decorum as allowed by State law. • Public comment is limited to those portions of the meeting referred to as Public Comments. These portions are intended for members of the public to address the City Council, Successor Agency, Housing Assistance Agency or Water Authority on matters related to agendas or any other items under the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council or Agencies. Please fill out the desired color-coded card prior to the start of the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Once the meeting has begun, no further cards will be accepted. • A yellow Public Hearing Comment Request card must be completed to speak during a Public Hearing.
• A green Public Comment Request – Card is for those wishing to address the Council/Agency on agenda items or any other items under the subject jurisdiction of the City Council/Agency.
• Citizens may address the Council, Successor Agency or Housing Assistance Agency once for a maximum of three minutes. After each speaker returns to his/her seat, the Mayor shall determine the time and manner of response, but typically if answers are available, they will be given after all speakers have had an opportunity to address the City Council.
• Members of the audience are asked to refrain from clapping or otherwise speaking from their seats. Those not meeting the standards for decorum may be escorted from the meeting.

RULES OF DECORUM CAN BE FOUND IN THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

2.08.050 AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 783 ADOPTED ON AUGUST 20, 1990 AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCES 822 (SEPTEMBER 21, 1992) AND 1020 (MARCH 21, 2006).

Tuesday, June 13, 2023
A Regular Meeting of the City Council and Water Authority was held in the Parks and Recreation Community Room, 6767 Passons Boulevard, Pico Rivera, California.

Mayor/President Lutz called the regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. on behalf of the City Council and Water Authority.

PRESENT: Camacho, Garcia, Lara, Sanchez, Lutz
ABSENT: None
INVOCATION: Delivered by Councilmember Camacho
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Councilmember Garcia
City Manager Carmona noted that the City Manager Reports section of the agenda will be moved before the Public Hearing.

SPECIAL PRESENTATION(S):
• Certificate of Recognitions were presented to the three (3) Pico Rivera Utility Box Art Program (Phase II) winners: Cinthia Sandoval, Mike Castro, and Michelle Fleck
• A Proclamation for Pride month
CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS:

Public Works Director Negrete provided a brief update on the Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project which included the project scope, location, purpose and features, Mines Avenue improvement renderings, conceptual design renderings, and the anticipated project schedule.

PUBLIC HEARING:

City Council:

1. Public Hearing – Fiscal Year 2023-25 Biennial Preliminary (Proposed) Budget. (700)
Mayor Lutz opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral communications to provide public testimony.
1 6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 2 of 10 ends

Mayor Lutz noted there was one (1) written communication received from Pico Fast Pitch Board Member Ryan Sifuentes in support of the Rio Vista Musco Lights (Field #2) project listed in the Capital Improvement Program.

Mayor Lutz closed the public hearing.

Motion by Councilmember Camacho, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lara to: 1) Conduct a hearing; and 2) Provide direction on the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) funding.

Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Camacho, Garcia, Lara, Sanchez, Lutz
NOES: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Anita Perez/Fernando Centeno, Helpline Youth Counseling, Inc.:
• Addressed the City Council regarding the Helpline Youth Counseling center prevention programs and services.

John Soto:
• Addressed the City Council to express concerns regarding the recent Pico Rivera Golf Course Noise Assessment study.

Maria Soto:
• Addressed the City Council to express concerns regarding the recent Pico Rivera Golf Course Noise Assessment study.

Lauren Talbott, Pico Rivera Library Manager:
• Addressed the City Council regarding library updates and upcoming Summer events.

Moses Castillo, Dordulian Law Group Senior Detective:
• Addressed the City Council requesting City support in the homicide case of resident, Juan Orozco.

Silvia Rosales:
• Addressed the City Council requesting City support in the homicide case of resident, Juan Orozco.

Karen Orozco:
• Addressed the City Council requesting City support in the homicide case of resident, Juan Orozco.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS:

City Council:
6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 3 of 10 ends

2. Minutes:
• Approved City Council regular meeting of May 9, 2023 and special meetings of May 9, 2023 and May 31, 2023.

3. Approved 18th Warrant Register of the 2022-2023 Fiscal Year. (700) Check Numbers: 291623-291928
Special Check Numbers: 11955-11956; 11997-11997

4. Second Reading – Adoption of Ordinance No. 1171 Prohibiting Spectators and Participants at Illegal Motor Vehicle Speed Contests or Exhibitions of Speed Known as “Street Takeovers”. (1400)

1. Adopted Ordinance No. 1171 adding Chapter 10.84 to the Pico Rivera Municipal Code to prohibit spectators and participants at illegal motor vehicle speed contests or exhibitions of speed and to establish the forfeiture of nuisance vehicles engaged therein; and

2. Authorized the City Manager or authorized designee to accept and execute all documents necessary to implement and enforce the ordinance.

Ordinance No. 1171 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.84 OF TITLE 10 OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT

SPECTATORS AND PARTICIPANTS AT ILLEGAL MOTOR VEHICLE

SPEED CONTESTS OR EXHIBITIONS OF SPEED AND TO ESTABLISH

THE FORFEITURE OF NUISANCE VEHICLES ENGAGED THEREIN
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)

5. Rescind Resolution No. 7200, Approve a Resolution Reflecting the Correct Fiscal Year 2022-23 GANN Appropriations Limit and Adopt the Fiscal Year 2023-24 GANN Appropriations Limit. (700)

1. Rescinded Resolution No. 7200 and approved Resolution No. 7283 in its place reflecting the correct fiscal year (FY) 2022-23 GANN Appropriations Limit; and

2. Approved Resolution No. 7284 adopting the FY 2023-24 GANN Appropriations Limit.

Resolution No. 7283 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7200 AND IN ITS PLACE, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A PROPOSED

RESOLUTION REFLECTING THE CORRECT ANNUAL
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
Resolution No. 7284 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 4 of 10 ends

6. Approve a Resolution Updating the City’s Capital Asset Capitalization Policy. (700)

1. Approved Resolution No. 7285 updating the City’s Capitalization Policy.

Resolution No. 7285 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, UPDATING THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA’S CAPITAL ASSET CAPITALIZATION POLICY

7. Approve a Resolution to Adopt Projects for Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 for Fiscal Year 2023-24. (700)

1. Approved Resolution No. 7286 ratifying the road repair project(s) for fiscal year 2023-24 funded by Senate Bill 1 – The Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1).

Resolution No. 7286 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF
PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 FUNDED BY SENATE BILL 1 – ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 FUNDS

8. Approve a Resolution Authorizing the Submission of Three (3) Potential Applications for the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation – Recreational Trails Program Fund Grant. (700)

1. Approved Resolution No. 7287 authorizing the submission of three (3) potential applications for the State of California’s Department of Parks and Recreation – Recreational Trails Program; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents reasonably necessary for the completion of the awarded project and/or agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Resolution No. 7287 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL

OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION “RECREATIONAL
TRAILS PROGRAM” FUND GRANT

9. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Public Restroom Company for the Pico Park Outdoor Field Restroom Replacement Project (CIP No. 50085). (500)

1. Awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Public Restroom Company, a vendor with Sourcewell (Contract No. 081721-PRM), for the purchase of one (1) SP-132 prefabricated restroom building including site supervision for installation in the amount of $353,296, and authorized the 6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 5 of 10 ends

City Manager to execute all documents in a form approved by the City Attorney; and

2. Authorized the transfer of Capital Improvement Project Fund (CIP) appropriation of $50,000 from the Rio Hondo Park Handball Court Repair project to the Pico Park Outdoor Field Restroom Replacement project.

Agreement No. 23-2198

10. Approve Two (2) Lease-Purchase Agreements with Leaf Capital Funding, LLC and a Maintenance Agreement with IBE Digital for a Production Copier for Specialized Printing. (500)

1. Approved a 63-month lease-purchase agreement with Leaf Capital Funding, LLC for a Konica Minolta C4070 Copier in the amount of $79,406 for the lease plus $8,130 for estimated taxes for a total of $87,535;

2. Approved a 63-month lease-purchase agreement with Leaf Capital Funding, LLC for a Programmable Cutter and Friction Feed folder for the Konica Minolta C4070 Copier in the amount of $33,636 for the lease plus $3,438 for estimated taxes for a total $ 37,073;

3. Approved a 63-month maintenance agreement with IBE Digital for maintenance and operations of the Konica Minolta C4070 copier machine and related equipment in the Parks and Recreation Department in the amount of $63,000; and

4. Authorized the City Manager to execute all documents related to the copier lease and maintenance agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.

11. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Passage Entertainment Inc. for Sound and Audio Engineering at all City Special Events. (500)

1. Awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to Passage Entertainment Inc. for sound and audio engineering at all City Special Events, in the amount not-to-exceed amount of $100,000 per year with the option to extend for a total of two (2) years; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to execute all documents necessary for the purchase and PSA submission and/or related agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Agreement No. No. 23-2199

12. Award a Professional Services Agreement to VCS Sound and Lighting for Stage, Lighting, and an LED Screen at all City Special Events. (500)

1. Awarded a Professional Services Agreement (PSA) to VCS Sound and lighting for the stage, lighting, and an LED screen at all City Special Events, in the amount not-to-exceed $300,000, for a three-year term with a not-to-exceed amount of $100,000 per year with the option to extend for total of two (2) years; and
6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 6 of 10 ends

2. Authorized the City Manager to execute all documents necessary for the PSA submission and/or related agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Agreement No. 23-2197

13. Hot Spot Intersection Improvements at Rosemead Boulevard and Beverly Boulevard (CIP No. 21276), Lindell Avenue Block Wall (Project) – Award of Construction Contract. (500)

1. Awarded a construction contract for a not-to-exceed amount of $107,000 to HZS Engineering dba HZS Construction for the Project and authorized the City Manager to execute the contract in a form approved by the City Attorney; and

2. Authorized the City Manager to approve change orders, as needed, in an amount not-to-exceed $10,7000, (approximately 10% of the total contract amount) for construction contingency.

Agreement No. 23-2200

14. Amend a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Pico Rivera and Service Employees’ International Union Local 721 – Directors Unit Members for a Three-Year Term, July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024. (500)

1. Approved Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Pico Rivera and the Service Employees International Union Local 721 – Directors Union (SEIU Directors).

15. ADA City Hall/City Hall West Project – Approve Construction Change Order No. 3. (500)

1. Amended fiscal year 2022-23 Adopted Budget by appropriating $220,000 from the Public Image Enhancement Fund to CIP No. 50073;

2. Approved Change Order No. 3 for changes to the contract plans and specifications for the ADA City Hall/City Hall West Project, CIP No. 50073 project, in the amount of $164,772 for a new total not-to-exceed construction contract amount of $858,869; and

3. Authorized the City Manager or his designee to issue Change Order No. 3 for the project.

16. Local Roadway Safety Plan LRSPL-5351 (039) (NON-CIP NO 4700) – Receive and file. (500)
This item was pulled from the agenda for further discussion and clarification. 6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 7 of 10 ends

17. Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of April 30, 2023. (700)

1. Received and filed the Treasurer's Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of April 30, 2023.

Water Authority:

18. Minutes:
• Approved Water Authority regular meeting of May 9, 2023.

19. PFAS Treatment System Project (CIP No. 50042) – Execute Professional Services Agreements for Ion Exchange Resin and Design Services. (500)

1. Approved a Professional Services Agreement to complete the scope of work under Agreement No. 21-58, in the amount not-to-exceed $1,746,134, to Calgon Carbon Corporation (Calgon Corporation), for procurement of Ion Exchange (IX) resin for treatment of per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for the PFAS Treatment System Project (CIP No. 50042), and authorized the Executive Director to execute the agreement in a form approved by the General Counsel; and

2. Approved a Professional Services Agreement to complete the scope of work under Agreement No. 20-50, in the amount not-to-exceed $1,289,194, to Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Jacobs Engineering), to provide engineering design and construction support services for treatment of the PFAS Treatment System Project (CIP No. 50042) and authorized the Executive Director to execute the agreement in a form approved by the General Counsel.

Agreement No. 23-72 Agreement No. 23-73
Councilmember Camacho recused himself and did not participate in the vote of Consent Calendar Item No. 10 Agreements with Leaf Capital Funding, LLC and IBE Digital for a Production Copier due to Senate Bill 1439 – Campaign Contributions.

Motion by Councilmember/Commissioner Garcia, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem/Vice President Lara to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18 and 19. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Camacho, Garcia, Lara, Sanchez, Lutz
NOES: None
RECUSE: Camacho (Item No. 10)
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION:

16. Local Roadway Safety Plan LRSPL-5351 (039) (NON-CIP NO 4700) – Receive and file. (500)
6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 8 of 10 ends

Public Works Director Negrete provided a presentation covering local roadway safety plan process, project status, milestones, community comments, City collision analysis findings, signalized intersection improvements, roadway segment improvements, the four (4) E’s of Traffic Safety, safety projects, citywide sign upgrade, the list of unfunded and grant awarded projects. He also commented on the process of requesting traffic calming devices and the upgraded traffic signals that include countdown timers.

Motion by Councilmember Camacho, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lara to receive and file the Local Roadway Safety Plan. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Camacho, Garcia, Lara, Sanchez, Lutz
NOES: None
REGULAR AGENDA: None
GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234 REPORTS, NEW BUSINESS, OLD BUSINESS):

Councilmember Garcia reported on his attendance to a community meeting at Rivera Park with Captain Hutak regarding the community’s safety concerns.

Councilmember Dr. Sanchez reported on her attendance at the Villanueva Mobilehome Park Neighborhood Watch Recognition Ceremony and requested assistance from City staff in sharing the homicide investigation information on the City’s social media platforms.

Mayor Pro Tem Lara reported on his attendance at the Villanueva Mobilehome Park Neighborhood Watch Recognition Ceremony and the Southeast Water Coalition meeting where the 3M Settlement regarding PFAS was discussed. He also requested for staff to look into the City providing financial assistance to the Juan Orozco homicide investigation, seconded by Councilmember Camacho.

City Council reported on their attendance to the Annual California Contract Cities Seminar in Indian Wells; the International Council of Shopping Centers Las Vegas Premier event; the Santo Fish Seafood Restaurant grand opening; and the City’s Memorial Day event.

Mayor Lutz reported on his attendance at a Gateway Cities Council of Government’s meeting, the US Conference of Mayors in Columbus, Ohio, the Rio Hondo College Scholarship Fundraiser event, and the Old Towne Orange Tour-Historic Whittier Boulevard with City staff and other agencies officials. He also mentioned the Pio Pico Woman’s Club Luau event on June 14, 2023 and requested for staff to look into renaming the Pico Rivera Library in honor of Gloria Molina, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Lara.
6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 9 of 10 ends

Recessed to Closed Session at 7:07 p.m.

ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT
Reconvened from Closed Session at 7:46 p.m.

ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT
CLOSED SESSION(S):
a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
BKK Working Group Confidential Agreement related to the BKK Class I Landfill Cost Recovery Efforts
One Matter
City Attorney Alvarez-Glasman stated that the City Council unanimously approved the agreement. Direction was provided to the City Attorney to execute and forward agreement to BKK Working Group. No final action was taken and there was nothing further to report.
b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1)
City of Pico Rivera vs 3M Company, et al.

U.S. District Court Case No. 2:22-cv-0066-RMG
City Attorney Alvarez-Glasman stated the City Council received a briefing and direction was provided to the City Attorney. No final action was taken and there was nothing further to report.
c. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE EVALUATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1)
Title: City Manager
City Attorney Alvarez-Glasman stated that direction was provided to the City Attorney and the item will be brought before the City Council at the next City Council meeting.

No final action was taken and there was nothing further to report.

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor/President Lutz adjourned the City Council and Water Authority meeting at 7:50 p.m. in memory of El Rancho High School Alumni and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisor Gloria Molina. There being no objection it was so ordered.

AYES: Camacho, Garcia, Lara, Sanchez, Lutz
NOES: None
6-13-23.CityCouncilMinutes

Page 10 of 10 ends

______________________________________
Erik Lutz, Mayor/President
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cynthia Ayala, Jr. Deputy City Clerk/Interim Agency Secretary I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct report of the proceedings of the City Council regular meeting dated June 13, 2023, and approved by the City Council and on June 27, 2023.
________________________________
Cynthia Ayala, Jr. Deputy City Clerk/Interim Agency Secretary MEETING DATE: 6/27/2023

CHECK DATE STARTING ENDING AMOUNT
CHECK NUMBERS: 5/24/23-6/15/23 291929 292069 $ 1,974,071.53 ACH NUMBERS: 5/24/23-6/15/23 12025 12125 $ 3,047,152.54 SPECIAL CHECKS/EFT: 12124 12124
VOIDED CHECKS/EFT:

PRE-NOTE
TOTAL REGISTER AMOUNT: $ 5,021,224.07
19th WARRANT REGISTER OF THE 2022 - 2023 FISCAL YEAR
2 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
291929 06/01/2023 06/09/2023 Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin $10,235.00 Invoice Date
2023JUNEATTYFEES 06/01/2023
291930 06/01/2023 06/06/2023 American Marker $6,218.10
Invoice Date
10309-23 05/12/2023
10319-23 05/23/2023
291931 06/01/2023 06/12/2023 AN, HAEUN $270.88
Invoice Date
0523PRIMTRUUP-HA 05/15/2023
291932 06/01/2023 06/12/2023 CINTAS CORP. $406.40
Invoice Date
8406144513 02/28/2023
8406233682 04/30/2023
291933 06/01/2023 06/07/2023 HERNANDEZ, JAVIER $78.00
Invoice Date
0523METROPASS-JH 05/30/2023
Accounts Payable
Description

METROLINK PARKING PASSES, PROMO TOUR WHITTIER BLVD PROJECT Description

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED GOLF COURSE

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED GOLF COURSE Description
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TRUE UP PAYMENTS 10.2022 ROUND Accounts Payable

SENIOR CENTER CUSTOMIZED ITEMS

SENIOR CENTER CUSTOMIZED SHIRTS
Accounts Payable
CITY ATTY RETAINER FEE FOR JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating
Check
Accounts Payable
Description
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
user: April Zamora Pages: 1 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
291934 06/01/2023 06/07/2023 HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE

CITY OF LOS ANGELES
$749.12
Invoice Date
0623REIMSECT8-GO 05/25/2023
291935 06/01/2023 06/09/2023 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore $2,150.00 Invoice Date
MAY 11, 2023 05/31/2023
291936 06/01/2023 06/02/2023 Lucero, Miguel $75.75
Invoice Date
0523REIMPWCAK-ML 05/30/2023
291937 06/01/2023 Minuteman Press $577.05
Invoice Date
66505 05/24/2023
66506 05/24/2023
291938 06/01/2023 On The Go DJ Pro, Inc $500.00
Invoice Date
1260570 03/27/2023
291939 06/01/2023 06/02/2023 RODOLFO ALVARADO $884.76
SENIOR CENTER ENTERTAINMENT 6/6/23
Accounts Payable

VARIOUS MAILERS & POSTCARDS FOR PRIME
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

VARIOUS MAILERS & POSTCARDS FOR PRIME
Accounts Payable
Description

REIMBURSEMENT, CAKE FOR NATIONAL PW WEEK LUNCHEON
Accounts Payable
Description
TRAINING 5/11/23
Accounts Payable
Description
HACLA SECTION 8 PAYMENTS FOR GILBERT ORTIZ
user: April Zamora Pages: 2 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
0523REIMSTCKR-RA 05/31/2023
291940 06/01/2023 06/12/2023 So Calif Edison Company $11,404.89 Invoice Date
0523LNGTRMALLSE 05/26/2023
291941 06/01/2023 Vargas, Christina $5.00
Invoice Date
0523REIMOVRPY-CV 05/11/2023
291942 06/01/2023 06/02/2023 VASQUEZ, KATHLYNN $2,874.71 Invoice Date
2023JANTUIREIMKV 05/25/2023
291943 06/01/2023 06/06/2023 West Coast Arborists, Inc $35,478.00 Invoice Date
200168 05/15/2023
291944 06/01/2023 06/07/2023 Yao Engineering, Inc. $1,353.55 Invoice Date
PR2303 05/15/2023 PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2023, WELL #5 ELECTRICAL UPGRADES ESDC GRID PRUNING 5/1/23-5/15/23
Accounts Payable
Description
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT JANUARY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT ON FRAUD RECOVERY AGREEMENT
Accounts Payable
Description

LONG TERM RENEWABLES VOLUNTARY ALLOCATION-PURCHASE PWR
Accounts Payable
Description

REIMBURSEMENT ON CUSTOM STICKER SHEETS FOR TRANSIT VANS Accounts Payable
Description
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 3 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
291945 06/01/2023 Yari More $2,100.00
Invoice Date
1225 05/19/2023
291946 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 1st Jon Inc $664.99
Invoice Date
105963 05/30/2023
291947 06/08/2023 Alliance of Light Productions,
LLC.
$300.00
Invoice Date
0623TUPREFND-ALL 06/07/2023
291948 06/08/2023 ALTA LANGUAGE SERVICES,
INC.
$55.00
Invoice Date
IS656321 05/31/2023
291949 06/08/2023 Big City Print $323.26
Invoice Date
5385 05/09/2023
291950 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 BMG Money, Inc $364.13
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 06/02/23

SENIOR CENTER WINDO WRAPS, VETERAN RESOURCE CENTER
Accounts Payable
Description

LISTENING & SPEAKING TEST (IVR)
Accounts Payable
Description
REIMBURSEMENT PL TUP FILMING #2023-753, 8540 WHITTIER
Accounts Payable
Description

MEMORIAL DAY CEREMONY RESTROOM
Accounts Payable
Description
SENIOR CENTER ENTERTAINMENT 5/25/23
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 4 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
291951 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Central Basin Municipal Water District
$2,941.64
Invoice Date
RIV-APR23 05/16/2023
291952 06/08/2023 Century Rooter & Jetting
Service, Inc
$6,277.00
Invoice Date
74024 04/26/2023
73850 04/05/2023
74007 04/26/2023
291953 06/08/2023 CINTAS CORP. $2,420.15
Invoice Date
8406190239 03/31/2023
8406274406 05/31/2023
8406274405 05/31/2023
8406274407 05/31/2023
8406274725 05/31/2023
291954 06/08/2023 CivicWell $4,277.50
Invoice Date
107193 05/25/2023
107192 05/25/2023
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 4/1/23-4/30/23, WHITTIER BL SPECIFIC PLAN PROFESSIONAL SVC 4/1/23-4/30/23, WHITTIER BL CALTRANS GRANT

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED CITYWIDE
Accounts Payable
Description

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED GOLF COURSE

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED CITYWIDE

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED CITYWIDE
Accounts Payable
Description

REPLENISH AND SERVICE FIRST AID KITS AND AED GOLF COURSE

BACKFLOW

BACKFLOW
BACKFLOW-4632 ORANGE ST
UTILITIES FOR MARCH 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 5 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
291955 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Daktronics, Inc $540.00
Invoice Date
6996003 08/25/2022
291956 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Daniels Tire Service $722.72 Invoice Date
200474492 05/23/2023
291957 06/08/2023 Esther Celiz $100.00
Invoice Date
COMSTP060523-EC 06/06/2023
291958 06/08/2023 Ewing Irrigation Products Inc $3,860.70 Invoice Date
19480059 05/22/2023
19479987 05/22/2023
19480327 05/22/2023
19480508 05/22/2023
291959 06/08/2023 Ferguson Enterprises, Inc $1,505.62
Invoice Date
2372955-1 03/21/2023
Description

PLUMBING SUPPLIES

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
Accounts Payable
Description

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS

IRRIGATION SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
Description
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 06/05/23
Accounts Payable
Description

TIRES FOR CITY FLEET
Accounts Payable
Description

ONSITE TECHNICAL SVCS
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 6 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
2372955 03/15/2023
291960 06/08/2023 Franchise Tax Board $50.00
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
291961 06/08/2023 Fuller Engineering Inc $1,091.36
Invoice Date
148633 05/30/2023
291962 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Global Equipment Company $1,118.57 Invoice Date
23275437 05/31/2023
291963 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Grainger $529.28
Invoice Date
9718619134 05/24/2023
9711533100 05/18/2023
291964 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Harrington Industrial Plastics LLC
$452.29
Invoice Date
001EA287 05/18/2023 PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

SMALL TOOLS FOR WATER DIVISION
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

SMALL TOOLS FOR WATER DIVISION
Accounts Payable
Description

EXTRA LARGE CART FOR MALT TRANSPORT
Accounts Payable
Description

CHEMICALS
Accounts Payable
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 06/02/23

DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES
user: April Zamora Pages: 7 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
291965 06/08/2023 Infinity Technologies $17,498.75
Invoice Date
1106 01/05/2023
1155 02/06/2023
1199 03/06/2023
1307 04/05/2023
1414 05/05/2023
1360 05/03/2023
291966 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 LARA, ANDREW, C. $1,199.07 Invoice Date
0523REIMCONF-AL 06/03/2023
291967 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Levying Officer $233.39
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
291968 06/08/2023 Maldonado, Virginia $35.00
Invoice Date
835444 06/01/2023
291969 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Martinez, Aric, L $100.00
Invoice Date
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

REFUND -UNABLE TO ATTEND EXCURSION
Accounts Payable
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 06/02/23
Accounts Payable
Description
REIMBURSE CA CONTRACT CITIES 5/18-5/21/23, ICSC 5/21/23 BILLING FOR 3DI PERMITTING MARCH 2023
BILLING FOR 3DI PERMITTING APRIL 2023
GIS COORDINATION SVCS, APRIL 2023
BILLING FOR DECEMBER 2022 3DI PERMITTING
BILLING FOR JANUARY 2023 3DI PERMITTING
BILLING FOR 3DI PERMITTING FEBRUARY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 8 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
COMSTP060523-AM 06/06/2023
291970 06/08/2023 Milagro Media Strategies $3,500.00
Invoice Date
2010 06/06/2023
291971 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Moore Iacofano & Goltsman Inc $26,370.30 Invoice Date
0081211 06/02/2023
291972 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Nasco Education LLC $1,929.38 Invoice Date
447709 06/02/2023
291973 06/08/2023 National Construction Rentals,
Inc.
$2,600.16
Invoice Date
0623RSMDABAT-NCR 06/06/2023
291974 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 NUFIC $359.13
Invoice Date
060123 06/08/2023
291975 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Accounts Payable Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc $692.37 Accounts Payable
Description
SUPPLEMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE FOR JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
4614 ROSEMEAD BLVD FENCING-ABATEMENT(BUBBLES CAR WASH)
Accounts Payable
Description

REACH SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2023, HISTORIC WHITTIER SPECIFIC PLAN Accounts Payable
Description
PUBLIC RELATIONS AND MEDIA SVCS MAY 2023
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 06/05/23
user: April Zamora Pages: 9 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
51201845 05/19/2023
291976 06/08/2023 06/14/2023 Nutrien AG Solutions, Inc $692.37 Invoice Date
51252454 05/23/2023
291977 06/08/2023 O'Reilly Auto Parts $249.93
Invoice Date
3583-450044 05/30/2023
3583-449056 05/24/2023
3583-447752 05/16/2023
291978 06/08/2023 Oromill Lumber, Inc. $115.16
Invoice Date
236667 05/24/2023
291979 06/08/2023 Pacific Telemanagement
Services (PTS)
$113.00
Invoice Date
2106757 05/25/2023
291980 06/08/2023 Paint 'n Pour $605.00
Invoice Date Description
Description
PAY PHONES FOR PR CITY HALL & PUBLIC LIBRARY JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

SMALL TOOLS FOR FACILITIES
Accounts Payable
AUTO SUPPLIES FOR UNIT #131,132

AUTO SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Description

MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description

WEED ABATEMENT SUPPLIES
Description

WEED ABATEMENT MATERIALS
user: April Zamora Pages: 10 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
104 06/05/2023
291981 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Passage Entertainment $1,200.00 Invoice Date
05312023SCPE 05/16/2023
291982 06/08/2023 06/09/2023 PEREZ, JORDAN $477.72
Invoice Date
0523REIMICSC-JP 05/30/2023
291983 06/08/2023 06/08/2023 PETTY CASH $78.30
Invoice Date
2023PETCASRE0523 06/05/2023
291984 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 PM Law Enforcement Services, LLC
$5,000.00
Invoice Date
23-003 06/01/2023
291985 06/08/2023 Pyro Spectaculars, Inc. $17,500.00
Invoice Date
301 03/23/2023
291986 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Robert Anthony Martinez $100.00 Description
BALANCE PRODUCTION FEE FOR SPECIAL FIREWORKS DISPLAY ON 07/01/23 Accounts Payable
Description
LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FOR 05/01/2023-05/31/2023
Accounts Payable
Description
REPLENISH PETTY CASH MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
REIMBURSEMENT FOR ICSC CONFERENCE, 5/21/23-5/23/23
Accounts Payable
Description

EQUIPMENT RENTAL, SENIOR CENTER EVENT
Accounts Payable
SENIOR CENTER PAINT PARTY EVENT 6/13/23
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 11 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
COMSTP060523-RM 06/06/2023
291987 06/08/2023 Rodriguez Barrios, Mirna $67.00
Invoice Date
835424 05/31/2023
291988 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 San Gabriel Valley Water Co $740.78 Invoice Date
2023MAYSANGABRIE 06/01/2023
2023MAYASANGABRI 06/01/2023
2023MAYBSANGABRI 06/01/2023
291989 06/08/2023 SEIU Local 721-COPE $72.00
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
291990 06/08/2023 06/09/2023 Soto Entertainment Group $11,375.00 Invoice Date
PRSED23 05/31/2023
291991 06/08/2023 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt
Dist
$306.46
Invoice Date

PERFORMER DEPOSITS FOR FIREWORKS SPECTACULAR AND SUMMER STREET Accounts Payable
Description
COPE FEES FOR P/E 06/02/23
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
Description
UTILITIES FOR MAY 2023
UTILITIES FOR MAY 2023
Description

REFUND BEGINNING HIP HOP CLASS FOR BRIDGET DIAZ
Accounts Payable
Description
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 06/05/23
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 12 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
4173746 05/02/2023
4172534 05/02/2023
291992 06/08/2023 Standard Insurance Company $2,542.44
Invoice Date
060123 06/08/2023
291993 06/08/2023 Swank Motion Pictures Inc $1,020.00
Invoice Date
RG 2045453 05/04/2023
291994 06/08/2023 Terra Realty Advisors Inc $1,435.41
Invoice Date
2023-01501 05/16/2023
2023-01519 06/01/2023
291995 06/08/2023 US Bank Corporate Trust
Services
$5,720.00
Invoice Date
6938489 06/01/2023
291996 06/08/2023 WEIGHT NO LONGER
NUTRITIONAL SERVICES, INC.
$150.00
Invoice Date
537154 05/31/2023
Accounts Payable
Description

SPEAKER FOR SENIOR CENTER HEALTH & FITNESS DAY
Accounts Payable
Description
1999 SERIES A PR WATER ANALYSIS, REVENUE BONDS ADMIN EXPENSE Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 4/3/23-4/28/23
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 5/12/23-5/30/23
Description

MOVIES IN THE PARK
Accounts Payable
Description
VISION SERVICES FOR JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable

EMISSIONS FEES FOR GENERATOR AT PARK & REC

EMISSION FEE FOR GENERATOR AT CITY HALL
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 13 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
291997 06/08/2023 Western Dental Services, Inc. $230.87 Invoice Date
306464 06/08/2023
291998 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 Whittier Fertilizer Company $2,160.88 Invoice Date
399126 05/16/2023
397938 04/25/2023
398784 05/09/2023
399102 05/15/2023
291999 06/08/2023 Yarisma Rocha $100.00
Invoice Date
COMSTP060523-YR 06/06/2023
292000 06/08/2023 06/13/2023 BANNER BANK $41,660.89
Invoice Date
0523RETESCR2003 06/08/2023
292001 06/08/2023 Diversified Protective Services $26,743.00 Invoice Date
15200 02/21/2023
Accounts Payable
Description

SECURITY SVCS, GOLF COURSE
Accounts Payable
Description
RETENTION ESCROW #2003, RJ NOBLE COMPANY
Accounts Payable
Description
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 06/05/23

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description

SAND & RAKE FOR SMITH PARK
Accounts Payable
Description
DENTAL SERVICES (DHMO) FOR JUNE 2023
user: April Zamora Pages: 14 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
14216 02/21/2023
15227 03/01/2023
15260 03/14/2023
15275 03/14/2023
15290 03/17/2023
15311 03/29/2023
15326 04/05/2023
15341 04/11/2023
15362 04/25/2023
15371 04/25/2023
15407 05/05/2023
15428 05/10/2023
15453 05/19/2023
15464 05/23/2023
15478 05/31/2023
15491 06/06/2023
292002 06/12/2023 DocuSign, Inc $6,550.86
Invoice Date
111100119610 06/12/2023
292003 06/15/2023 ACOSTA, MICHAEL $68.06
Invoice Date
Docusign (Electronic Signature Subscription Service)
Accounts Payable
Description

SECURITY SVCS, GOLF COURSE
Accounts Payable
Description

SECURITY SVCS, GOLF COURSE

SECURITY SVCS, GOLF COURSE
user: April Zamora Pages: 15 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
0623PRIMEMTR-MA 06/01/2023
292004 06/15/2023 Advantec Consulting
Engineering
$58,345.00
Invoice Date
9803-0266-06 04/28/2023
9803-0266-05 03/23/2023
9803-0266-07 05/26/2023
292005 06/15/2023 American Marker $2,092.54
Invoice Date
10328-23 06/07/2023
10329-23 06/12/2023
292006 06/15/2023 Ansafone Contact Center, Labell
Exchange & BTE Com
$468.42
Invoice Date
230606069101 06/01/2023
230606025101 06/01/2023
292007 06/15/2023 C.S. Legacy Construction, Inc. $224,728.90 Invoice Date
6-2023 04/28/2023
6-2023-A 04/28/2023
6-2023-B 04/28/2023 PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2023, WHITTIER BL OVERLAY Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2023, WHITTIER BL OVERLAY
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2023, WHITTIER BL OVERLAY
WATER DIV. AFTER HOURS ANSWERING SVCS MAY 2023
PW AFTER HOURS ANSWERING SVCS USAGE 5/23 SVC 6/23
Accounts Payable

SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

EMBROIDERY ON SHIRTS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2023, ITS MASTER PLAN
PROFESSIONAL SVCS FEBRUARY 2023, ITS MASTER PLAN
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2023, ITS MASTER PLAN
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TERM 22/23 PMTS
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 16 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
292008 06/15/2023 Cableguys Corporation $5,000.00
Invoice Date
483417 05/18/2023
292009 06/15/2023 Century Rooter & Jetting
Service, Inc
$2,740.00
Invoice Date
74025 05/03/2023
292010 06/15/2023 CliftonLarsonAllen LLP $3,675.00
Invoice Date
3732708 05/23/2023
292011 06/15/2023 Coastal Occupational Medical
Group
$270.00
Invoice Date
1456-77049 06/08/2023
292012 06/15/2023 Control Automation Design, Inc $11,160.00 Invoice Date
23-014 05/29/2023
23-017 05/31/2023
292013 06/15/2023 County of Los Angeles Dept of
Public Works
$359.88
SCADA PLANT # 1 & 3
PFAS PLANT 1, 2 & WELL 5
Accounts Payable

PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
Accounts Payable
Description
AUDIT SVCS FY 22/23
Accounts Payable
Description

BACKFLOW
Accounts Payable
Description

PROFESSIONAL SVCS
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 17 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
RE-PW23050805971 05/08/2023
292014 06/15/2023 County of Los Angeles
Environmental Health
$358.00
Invoice Date
0723FIREPERM-LAC 06/05/2023
292015 06/15/2023 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY $8,161.41
Invoice Date
W04372370101 06/08/2023
W04371660101 06/07/2023
292016 06/15/2023 DS Services of America, Inc. $159.87
Invoice Date
20044206 060923 06/09/2023
292017 06/15/2023 ECHAVARRIA, STEPHANY $157.15
Invoice Date
0623PRIMEMTR-SE 06/01/2023
292018 06/15/2023 Encore Awards & Marking Corp $37.53
Invoice Date
231655 05/23/2023
Accounts Payable
Description

NAME PLATE ENGRAVING
Accounts Payable
Description
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TERM 22/23 PMTS
Accounts Payable
Description
WATER DELIVERY 5/15/23
Description

REACH SUPPLIES

REACH SUPPLIES
Description
HEALTH PERMIT FOR FIREWORKS SPECTACULAR 7/1/23
Accounts Payable
Description
TS THROUGH KITS APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 18 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
292019 06/15/2023 Environmental Systems
Research Institute
$8,757.46
Invoice Date
94500540 06/06/2023
292020 06/15/2023 Fregoso, Jose $45.40
Invoice Date
0623PRIMEMTR-JF 06/01/2023
292021 06/15/2023 G.L.A.M. MUSIC INC. $1,325.00
Invoice Date
0723MUSCDEP-GLAM 06/01/2023
292022 06/15/2023 Gonzalez, Julia $126.75
Invoice Date
0623WRKLNCH-JG 06/08/2023
292023 06/15/2023 GoTo Communications, Inc. $2,904.08
Invoice Date
IN7102042314 06/01/2023
292024 06/15/2023 Guerra, Perfecto $16.04
Invoice Date
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES VOIP
Accounts Payable
Description

WORKING LUNCH
Accounts Payable
Description
MUSICAL PERFORMANCE 8/18/23, DEPOSIT
Accounts Payable
Description
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TERM 22/23 PMTS
Accounts Payable
Description
ARCGIS SOFTWARE LICENSE & SUBSCRIPTION 10/27/23-5/31/24 user: April Zamora Pages: 19 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
0623PRIMEMTR-PG 06/01/2023
292025 06/15/2023 Guillen, Ana $1,500.00
Invoice Date
0623CASHADV-AG 06/08/2023
292026 06/15/2023 HDR Engineering, Inc $2,579.62
Invoice Date
1200527651 06/06/2023
292027 06/15/2023 Infinity Technologies $16,063.75
Invoice Date
1436 06/07/2023
1437 06/07/2023
292028 06/15/2023 Joffe Emergency Services $3,080.00
Invoice Date
55502 06/07/2023
292029 06/15/2023 L. A. Pressure Supply LLC $33.08
Invoice Date
18445 06/01/2023 HOSE REPAIR

EMTS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS
Accounts Payable
Description
3DI PERMITTING MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
ON CALL IT MANAGEMENT MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

PROFESSIONAL SVCS ROSEMEAD BRT FEASIBILITY STUDY
Accounts Payable
Description

CASH ADVANCE FOR GAME BOOTH PRIZES
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TERM 22/23 PMTS
user: April Zamora Pages: 20 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
292030 06/15/2023 L.A. County Metropolitan Trans
Authority (TAP)
$359.00
Invoice Date
6019905 05/31/2023
292031 06/15/2023 LA County Sheriffs Department $1,043,351.71 Invoice Date
233347EC 06/08/2023
292032 06/15/2023 LEE, EFRAIN $1,500.00
Invoice Date
0623CASHADV-EL 06/08/2023
292033 06/15/2023 Los Angeles County Department
Public Health
$1,915.00
Invoice Date
IN1238936 05/08/2023
IN1227336 05/08/2023
292034 06/15/2023 MeterSYS $18,070.00
Invoice Date
INV-000836 05/01/2023
292035 06/15/2023 Minuteman Press $126.87
Invoice Date Description
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS AMI PROJECT CIP.50072
Accounts Payable
PUBLIC HEALTH PERMIT FY23/24, CITY YARD
PUBLIC HEALTH PERMIT FY23/24, SMITH PARK
Accounts Payable

CASH ADVANCE FOR GAME BOOTH PRIZES
Accounts Payable
Description
SHERIFF SVCS MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
METRO 30 DAY SENIOR PASS
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 21 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
66698 06/06/2023
292036 06/15/2023 Nasco Education LLC $421.13
Invoice Date
449920 06/08/2023
292037 06/15/2023 NV5, Inc. $2,201.25
Invoice Date
293037 10/05/2022
292997 11/04/2022
303025 12/01/2022
311731 02/23/2023
292038 06/15/2023 O'Reilly Auto Parts $50.63
Invoice Date
3583-450152 05/31/2023
292039 06/15/2023 Ollin Strategies $25,000.00
Invoice Date
151 01/15/2023
158 02/15/2023
165 03/15/2023
172 04/15/2023
CONSULTING SVCS MARCH 2023
CONSULTING SVCS APRIL 2023
Description
CONSULTING SVCS JANUARY 2023
CONSULTING SVCS FEBRUARY 2023
Description

AUTO SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
PROFESSIONAL SVCS OCTOBER 2022, 3900 BAYBAR RD
PROFESSIONAL SVCS DECEMBER 2022, 3900 BAYBAR RD
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 8/31/22, 3900 BAYBAR RD
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 7/1/22-8/31/22, 3900 BAYBAR
Description

REACH SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable

VARIOUS MAILERS & POSTCARDS FOR PRIME
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 22 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
179 05/15/2023
292040 06/15/2023 On The Go DJ Pro, Inc $350.00
Invoice Date
1262203 04/12/2023
292041 06/15/2023 Oromill Lumber, Inc. $122.96
Invoice Date
236728 05/31/2023
236613 05/22/2023
292042 06/15/2023 Pico Water District $17,680.06
Invoice Date
2023APRPICOWATER 06/01/2023
2023PICAWATER 06/01/2023
2023PICBWATER 06/01/2023
292043 06/15/2023 Pineda, Blanca $186.76
Invoice Date
0623PRIMEMTR-BP 06/01/2023
292044 06/15/2023 Preferred Impressions, Inc $3,506.25
Invoice Date
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TERM 22/23 PMTS
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
SENIOR CENTER ENTERTAINMENT 6/14/23
CONSULTING SVCS MAY 2023
user: April Zamora Pages: 23 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
26909 06/07/2023
26910 06/07/2023
292045 06/15/2023 Pro Line Gym Floors, Inc $11,550.00
Invoice Date
2923 05/31/2023
292046 06/15/2023 Quadient, Inc. $521.02
Invoice Date
N9868638 03/23/2023
292047 06/15/2023 RANGEL, IRMA $6.02
Invoice Date
0623PRIMEMTR-IR 06/01/2023
292048 06/15/2023 Revenue & Cost Specialists $11,250.00 Invoice Date
9141 05/31/2023
9142 05/31/2023
292049 06/15/2023 Salgado Tire Service $248.44
Invoice Date
1363 05/16/2023
Description
TIRE REPAIR UNIT 130
PROFESSIONAL SVCS, PROJECT 4302
PROFESSIONAL SVCS, PROJECT 4302
Accounts Payable
PRIME ANNUAL NET ENERGY METERING TERM 22/23 PMTS
Accounts Payable
Description
LEASE AND TAX 1/25/23-4/24/23
Accounts Payable
Description

GYM FLOOR MAINTENANCE-PARKS
Accounts Payable
Description

PR LETTERS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS
Accounts Payable
Description

PR LETTERS FOR SPECIAL EVENTS
user: April Zamora Pages: 24 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
1388 05/18/2023
292050 06/15/2023 Seismonos, Inc $10,000.00
Invoice Date
OZOMATLI 8.25.23 05/24/2023
292051 06/15/2023 State of California Dept of
Justice
$224.00
Invoice Date
660031 06/05/2023
292052 06/15/2023 Transtech Engineers, Inc $150,121.25
Invoice Date
20231100 12/31/2022
20231101 12/31/2022
20231102 12/31/2022
20231103 12/31/2022
20231104 12/31/2023
20231105 12/31/2022
20231565 01/31/2023
20231566 01/31/2023
20231567 01/31/2023
20231568 01/31/2023
20231569 01/31/2023 PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 1/31/23, WHITTIER NARROWS DAM PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 1/31/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 1/31/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 1/31/23, BERMUDEZ SITE
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/31/22, VALENCIA SCHOOL
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/31/22, BERMUDEZ SITE
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 1/31/23, ENGINEERING SVCS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/31/22, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/31/22, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/31/22, STAFF AUGMENTATION
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/31/22, CITY ENGINEERING SVCS Accounts Payable
Description
PRE-EMPLOYMENT LIVE SCANS MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
OZOMATLI SUMMER FEST PERFORMERS 8/25/23, DEPOSIT
TIRE REPAIR UNIT 127
user: April Zamora Pages: 25 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
20231939 02/28/2023
20231940 02/28/2023
20231941 02/28/2023
20231943 02/28/2023
20232458 03/31/2023
20232459 03/31/2023
20232460 03/31/2023
20232869 04/30/2023
20232870 04/30/2023
20232871 04/30/2023
20231942 02/28/2023
292053 06/15/2023 TRUSAIC $1,818.00
Invoice Date
CINV-029654 06/01/2023
292054 06/15/2023 Tyler Technologies, Inc. $7,200.00
Invoice Date
045-424086 05/31/2023
292055 06/15/2023 Whittier Fertilizer Company $130.80
Invoice Date
399356 05/24/2023
Accounts Payable
Description

LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
Accounts Payable
Description

NWS-CSV RECEIPT IMPORT
Accounts Payable
Description
2023 ACA JUNE PAYMENT
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/30/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/30/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/28/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/31/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/31/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/30/23, ENGINEERING SVCS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/28/23, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/28/23, 605 REHAB PROJECT
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/31/23, ENGINEERING SVCS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/28/23, ENGINEERING SVCS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/28/23, STAFF AUGMENTATION
user: April Zamora Pages: 26 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
292056 06/15/2023 Whittier Printing $4,408.95
Invoice Date
2745 05/23/2023
292057 06/15/2023 Yao Engineering, Inc. $18,404.00
Invoice Date
202305-23003 06/01/2023
202305-23006 06/01/2023
292058 06/15/2023 Zapien's Restaurant Group, Inc. $220.50 Invoice Date
5/18/2023 05/18/2023
292059 06/15/2023 ARROYO CLIFT, EMILY $48.40
292060 06/15/2023 BRAVO, ARLENE $60.02
292061 06/15/2023 DOMINGUEZ, CYNTHIA $13.61
292062 06/15/2023 LOPEZ, MARIA, SONIA $54.95
292063 06/15/2023 MACIAS , MARIA $50.19
292064 06/15/2023 OPENDOOR LABS INC $29.34
292065 06/15/2023 SANTOS, MARISOL $55.26
292066 06/15/2023 SOLORZANO, MARIA T. $27.75
292067 06/15/2023 Utility Management SOTO, PATRICIA $30.27 Refund
Utility Management
Refund
Utility Management
Refund
Utility Management
Refund
Utility Management
Refund
Utility Management
Refund
Utility Management
Refund

SENIOR CENTER EVENT REFRESHMENTS
Utility Management
Refund
Utility Management
Refund
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MAY 2023, SPORTS ARENA PUMP STATION
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MAY 2023, GOLF COURSE FIRE REPAIRS
Accounts Payable
Description

REACH YEARBOOK PRINTING
user: April Zamora Pages: 27 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
292068 06/15/2023 WANG, ZHONGMING $94.78
292069 06/15/2023 CONTRERAS EMBROIDERY $3,969.38
Invoice Date
1146-A 03/21/2023
$1,974,071.53
12025 05/25/2023 05/31/2023 So Calif Edison Company $17,212.43 Invoice Date
45050 05/04/2023
12026 05/25/2023 05/31/2023 So Calif Edison Company $196.86 Invoice Date
Import - 4601 05/04/2023
12027 05/26/2023 05/31/2023 Time Warner Cable $134.98
Invoice Date
Import - 4602 05/09/2023
12028 05/26/2023 05/31/2023 Frontier California $152.43 Invoice Date Description
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMINICATION
Accounts Payable
CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating
EFT
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR MARCH 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

I LOVE PICO SHIRTS
Type Check Totals: 141 Transactions
Utility Management
Refund
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 28 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Import - 4603 05/01/2023
12029 05/26/2023 05/31/2023 So Calif Edison Company $94.84 Invoice Date
45051 05/05/2023
12030 05/26/2023 05/31/2023 So Calif Edison Company $77.62 Invoice Date
Import - 4606 05/05/2023
12031 05/30/2023 05/31/2023 Time Warner Cable $302.97
Invoice Date
Import - 4607 05/11/2023
12032 05/30/2023 05/31/2023 City of Pico Rivera $1,016.41 Invoice Date
Import - 4608 05/30/2023
12033 05/31/2023 05/31/2023 City of Pico Rivera $25,823.92 Invoice Date
Import - 4609 05/31/2023
12034 05/31/2023 05/31/2023 Frontier California $7,567.98 Description

WATER SVC
Accounts Payable
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMINICATION
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 29 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
Import - 4610 05/04/2023
12035 06/01/2023 A & D Transportation, L.P. $1,980.00
Invoice Date
012925 05/25/2023
012926 05/25/2023
012924 05/25/2023
012961 05/25/2023
12036 06/01/2023 Bland, Renee $60.00
Invoice Date
SPRINGWK1023 05/25/2023
12037 06/01/2023 Cobian, Sr., Luis $974.40
Invoice Date
145000-145004 05/25/2023
12038 06/01/2023 NASA Services Inc $289,579.27
Invoice Date
2023JUNERUBFEES 06/01/2023
12039 06/01/2023 Nationwide Environmental
Services
$5,955.75
Description
RUBBISH ASSESSMENT FOR JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
NIPPON KEMPO AND MIXED MARTIAL ARTS 5/2/23-5/30/23
Accounts Payable
Description
UMPIRE SVCS FOR SENIOR LEAGUE 5/25/23
Accounts Payable
REACH RECITAL TRANSPORTATION 5/17/23
REACH FIELD TRIP BIRNEY TECH 5/24/23
Accounts Payable
Description
REACH RECITAL TRANSPORTATION 5/17/23
REACH RECITAL TRANSPORTATION 5/17/23
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 30 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
33227 03/31/2023
12040 06/01/2023 Ocean Blue Environmental
Services, Inc
$8,287.24
Invoice Date
38363 05/18/2023
38228 05/08/2023
38275 05/10/2023
38249 05/10/2023
12041 06/01/2023 Rousselle Company Inc. $1,035.00
Invoice Date
2023-001379 05/18/2023
2023-001380 05/18/2023
2023-001378 05/18/2023
2023-001377 05/18/2023
2023-001376 05/18/2023
2023-001375 05/18/2023
2023-001374 05/18/2023
2023-001373 05/18/2023
2023-001372 05/18/2023
2023-001371 05/18/2023
2023-001370 05/18/2023
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, CITY HALL
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, HISTORICAL MUSEUM
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, PARKS & REC
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, RIO VISTA PARK
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, SMITH PARK
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, SENIOR CENTER
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, RIO HONDO PARK
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, PR YOUTH CENTER
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, NATIVIDAD CENTER
Description
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, STREAMLAND PARK
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, PICO PARK
HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN UP, 8751 COFFMAN & PICO RD
HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN UP, 8751 COFFMAN & PICO RD
Accounts Payable
Description
HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN UP, 8751 COFFMAN & PICO RD
HAZARDOUS WASTE CLEAN UP, 8751 COFFMAN & PICO RD
Description
CATCH BASIN CLEANING SVCS MARCH 2023
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 31 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
2023-001369 05/18/2023
12042 06/01/2023 Shoeteria, Inc. $400.00
Invoice Date
0049523-IN 05/20/2023
0049700-IN 05/22/2023
12043 06/01/2023 Tanko Streetlighting, Inc $20,588.00
Invoice Date
68897 04/30/2023
12044 06/01/2023 Tristar Risk Management $3,333.37
Invoice Date
112711 05/20/2023
12045 06/01/2023 United Rentals (North America),
Inc
$263.59
Invoice Date
208638602-013 05/23/2023
790017232-024 05/19/2023
12046 06/01/2023 Western Water Works Supply
Company
$4,355.84
Invoice Date
1240890-00 05/22/2023
Accounts Payable
Description

MAIN AND SERVICE REPAIR
Description

SPECIAL EVENTS STORAGE AT SMITH PARK

REACH STORAGE
Description
GENERAL LIABILITY FEES JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS APRIL 2023, INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS
Accounts Payable

SAFETY SHOES FOR CARLOS CASTILLO

SAFETY SHOES FOR RAY FLORES
Accounts Payable
PEST CONTROL SVC MAY 2023, RIVERA PARK
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 32 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
1240418-00 05/05/2023
12047 06/01/2023 Willdan Engineering $29,882.00
Invoice Date
00418431R 05/17/2023
12048 06/01/2023 Frontier California $396.09
Invoice Date
Import - 4611 05/07/2023
12049 06/01/2023 So Calif Edison Company $19,150.98
Invoice Date
45054 05/08/2023
12050 06/01/2023 So Calif Edison Company $50.76
Invoice Date
45055 05/09/2023
12051 05/31/2023 05/31/2023 Jean Allen Escrow Co., Inc. $1,854,300.00 Invoice Date
05/26/2023 05/26/2023
12052 06/02/2023 Time Warner Cable $115.54
CLOSING BALANCE FOR WIRE PAYMENT ON 9357 KRUSE ROAD
Accounts Payable
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/31/23, ADA PROJECT CIP.50073 Accounts Payable
Description

MAIN SERVICE AND REPAIR
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 33 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
Import - 4614 05/16/2023
12053 06/02/2023 So Calif Gas Company $254.07
Invoice Date
Import - 4615 05/10/2023
12054 06/06/2023 Frontier California $1,772.72
Invoice Date
Import - 4617 05/10/2023
12055 06/06/2023 Verizon Wireless $489.06
Invoice Date
Import - 4618 05/12/2023
12056 06/07/2023 Frontier California $631.37
Invoice Date
Import - 4619 05/13/2023
12057 06/07/2023 So Calif Edison Company $129.77
Invoice Date
45062 05/16/2023 UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Accounts Payable
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
Description
GAS SVC-9530 SHADE LANE
Accounts Payable
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMINICATION
Accounts Payable
Description
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 34 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
12058 06/07/2023 So Calif Edison Company $29.23
Invoice Date
Import - 4621 05/16/2023
12059 06/07/2023 So Calif Edison Company $312.46
Invoice Date
45061 05/15/2023
12060 06/07/2023 So Calif Edison Company $263.35
Invoice Date
Import - 4624 05/15/2023
12061 06/07/2023 So Calif Edison Company $103.36
Invoice Date
Import - 4626 05/16/2023
12062 06/07/2023 So Calif Edison Company $28,863.42
Invoice Date
45063 05/17/2023
12063 06/08/2023 ANGULO, ALBERTO $40.00
Invoice Date
1613178 06/05/2023 PARTIAL REFUND, DUE TO BROKEN ARM
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
ELECTRIC SVC-4332 1/2 SAN GABRIEL
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 35 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
12064 06/08/2023 Aramark $653.42
Invoice Date
5860163867 05/18/2023
5860166666 05/25/2023
12065 06/08/2023 Baker Electric Inc $147,514.81
Invoice Date
REPORT 4-2023 05/24/2023
REPORT 4-2023-A 05/24/2023
REPORT 5-2023 05/24/2023
REPORT 5-2023-A 05/24/2023
12066 06/08/2023 Cosby Oil Company $7,352.70
Invoice Date
CL93551 05/10/2023
CL93551A 05/10/2023
12067 06/08/2023 Dance Image $1,755.00
Invoice Date
144954-144961 06/05/2023
12068 06/08/2023 Accounts Payable DIEGO'S AUTO REPAIR $2,199.53 Accounts Payable
Description
VARIOUS DANCE CLASSES 5/1/23-6/5/23
Description
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 05/01/2023-05/10/2023
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES WATER DIVISION 05/01/2023-05/10/2023 PROFESSIONAL SVCS JANUARY 2023, TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SVCS JANUARY 2023, TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS DECEMBER 2022, TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS PROFESSIONAL SVCS DECEMBER 2022, TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS

UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE

UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICE
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 36 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
29213 05/22/2023
29195 05/18/2023
12069 06/08/2023 GRM Information Management
Services, Inc
$10,532.24
Invoice Date
0480241 05/31/2023
0480239 05/31/2023
0480240 05/31/2023
0480238 05/31/2023
0480242 05/31/2023
0480237 05/31/2023
0480236 05/31/2023
0480243 05/31/2023
0481440 05/31/2023
12070 06/08/2023 Home Depot $1,026.15
Invoice Date
745772608 05/17/2023
12071 06/08/2023 Jason Sperling DBA People
Speak, LLC
$800.00
Invoice Date
PIC-0023 06/01/2023
Accounts Payable
Description
WEBSITE APPLICATION SVCS JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
MONTHLY ACCT MAINTENANCE FEE MAY 2023
INITIAL MOVE IN FEE MAY 2023
DOCUMENT SCAN SVC MAY 2023, HOUSING
MONTHLY FILE STORAGE MAY 2023, CED
MONTHLY FILE STORAGE MAY 2023, BUILDING
MONTHLY FILE STORAGE MAY 2023, CITY CLERK
MONTHLY FILE STORAGE MAY 2023, PW
MONTHLY FILE STORAGE MAY 2023, FINANCE
MONTHLY FILE STORAGE MAY 2023, PARKS & REC
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS OF UNIT 262
Accounts Payable
Description
Description
MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS OF UNIT 287
user: April Zamora Pages: 37 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
12072 06/08/2023 Martinez, Ben $80.00
Invoice Date
SPRINGWK1123 06/01/2023
12073 06/08/2023 Nationwide Retirement Solutions $5,226.10 Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
12074 06/08/2023 Nationwide RS $1,088.30
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
12075 06/08/2023 PRMPCEA $637.00
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
12076 06/08/2023 Rush Truck Centers of
California, Inc.
$551.88
Invoice Date
3030810466 01/09/2023
12077 06/08/2023 S & J Supply Co., Inc. $5,289.69
Invoice Date
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
Accounts Payable
Description
UNION DUES FOR P/E 06/02/23
Accounts Payable
Description
PEHP BENEFIT/DEDUCTION FOR P/E 06/02/23
Accounts Payable
Description
EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR P/E 06/02/23 (401A) Accounts Payable
Description
UMPIRE SVCS FOR SENIOR LEAGUE 6/1/23
user: April Zamora Pages: 38 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
S100211206.001 05/17/2023
12078 06/08/2023 SEIU Local 721 $1,459.81
Invoice Date
060823 06/08/2023
12079 06/08/2023 The Sherwin-Williams Co. $710.08
Invoice Date
6689-8 05/24/2023
6721-9 05/25/2023
12080 06/08/2023 Tristar Risk Management $3,833.37
Invoice Date
112727 05/28/2023
12081 06/08/2023 United Rentals (North America),
Inc
$420.02
Invoice Date
216102350-004 05/09/2023
790017234-024 05/31/2023
12082 06/08/2023 Vulcan Materials Co. $1,904.14
Invoice Date
73656701 05/26/2023
Description

ASPHALT FOR STREETS DIVISION

STORAGE CONTAINER FOR SMITH PARK

REACH STORAGE
Accounts Payable
CLAIMS ADMIN FEES JUNE 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

PAINT SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

PAINT SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
UNION DUES FOR P/E 06/02/23

MAINTENANCE AND SERVICES REPAIR
user: April Zamora Pages: 39 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
73656702 05/26/2023
73653458 05/24/2023
73653457 05/24/2023
73648649 05/19/2023
73648650 05/19/2023
73651145 05/22/2023
12083 06/08/2023 Waxie Sanitary Supply $2,147.60
Invoice Date
81738490 05/25/2023
81738487 05/25/2023
12084 06/08/2023 Weck Laboratories Inc. $1,286.00
Invoice Date
W3E2768 05/26/2023
W3E2767 05/26/2023
W3E1926 05/18/2023
W3E2130 05/22/2023
W3E2334 05/23/2023
W3E2335 05/23/2023
12085 06/08/2023 Western Water Works Supply
Company
$738.71
Invoice Date Description

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Accounts Payable

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Accounts Payable
Description

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Description

JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FOR PARKS

ASPHALT FOR STREETS DIVISION

ASPHALT FOR STREETS DIVISION
Accounts Payable

ASPHALT FOR STREETS DIVISION

ASPHALT FOR STREETS DIVISION
user: April Zamora Pages: 40 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
1239325-00 04/07/2023
1240246-00 05/02/2023
1240603-00 05/10/2023
12086 06/08/2023 Willdan Engineering $155.00
Invoice Date
00625504 05/22/2023
12087 06/08/2023 Time Warner Cable $134.98
Invoice Date
Import - 4628 05/20/2023
12088 06/08/2023 City of Pico Rivera $2,519.04
Invoice Date
Import - 4629 06/07/2023
12089 06/07/2023 Fidelity National Title Company $2,887.10 Invoice Date
6373-019-901 06/07/2023
12090 06/12/2023 DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.
$11,435.22
Invoice Date
79353437 03/23/2023 CITYWIDE COPIERS LEASE 4/1/23-4/30/23

CLOSING COST EXCEED FOR THE TRIANGLE-SHAPED LOT
Accounts Payable
Description

WATER SVC
Accounts Payable
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMINICATION
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/28/23, EV CHARGING
Accounts Payable
Description

MAIN SERVICE & REPAIR
Accounts Payable
Description

MAIN SERVICE & REPAIR

MAIN SERVICE & REPAIR
user: April Zamora Pages: 41 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
79458275 03/31/2023
79693037 04/24/2023
79726828 05/01/2023
79963422 05/23/2023
80001818 05/31/2023
12091 06/09/2023 So Calif Edison Company $5,480.46
Invoice Date
Import - 4630 05/19/2023
12092 06/09/2023 Frontier California $152.16
Invoice Date
Import - 4631 05/07/2023
12093 06/12/2023 T-Mobile USA, Inc $2,069.76
Invoice Date
Import - 4632 05/21/2023
12094 06/12/2023 Frontier California $168.09
Invoice Date
Import - 4633 05/16/2023
12095 06/12/2023 Accounts Payable Office Depot $5,601.49 Accounts Payable
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
Description

RADIO & TELECOMMUNICATION
Accounts Payable
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Accounts Payable
Description
ELECTRIC SVC-3260 FAIRWAY DR
CITYWIDE COPIERS LEASE 5/15/23-6/14/23
CITYWIDE COPIERS LEASE 6/1/23-6/30/23
CITYWIDE COPIERS LEASE 6/15/23-7/14/23
CITYWIDE COPIERS LEASE 4/15/23-5/14/23
CITYWIDE COPIERS LEASE 5/1/23-5/31/23
user: April Zamora Pages: 42 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
Invoice Date
Import - 4634 05/31/2023
12096 06/13/2023 Frontier California $554.91
Invoice Date
Import - 5541 05/19/2023
12097 06/13/2023 So Calif Edison Company $5,087.32
Invoice Date
45068 05/22/2023
12098 06/13/2023 So Calif Edison Company $142.24
Invoice Date
Import - 5543 05/22/2023
12099 06/15/2023 B&H Photo Video $4,474.82
Invoice Date
899959285 06/01/2023
12100 06/15/2023 BKF Engineers $23,703.45
Invoice Date
23041222 04/24/2023
23041173 04/24/2023 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 2/27/23-3/31/23, REGIONAL BIKEWAY Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 2/27/23-3/31/23, WHITTIER BRIDGE STUDY Accounts Payable
Description

REACH SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable
Description
ELECTRIC SVC-4632 ORANGE ST
Accounts Payable
Description
UTILITIES FOR APRIL 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
Radio & Telecommunication
Description
Office Supplies
user: April Zamora Pages: 43 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
12101 06/15/2023 Bland, Renee $50.00
Invoice Date
SPRINGWK1223CHAM 06/08/2023
12102 06/15/2023 Complete Printing Solutions, Inc. $657.48 Invoice Date
PRP 47622 05/25/2023
12103 06/15/2023 Corporate Image Marketing, Inc $199.00 Invoice Date
2306635 06/01/2023
12104 06/15/2023 Cosby Oil Company $14,016.92
Invoice Date
CL94124 05/20/2023
CL94124A 05/20/2023
CL94752 05/31/2023
CL94752A 05/31/2023
12105 06/15/2023 COSTAR REALTY
INFORMATION, INC.
$3,102.76
Invoice Date
120356931 06/05/2023 REAL ESTATE ONLINE SVCS JUNE 2023
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES WATER DIVISION 05/21/23/-05/31/23 Accounts Payable
Description
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 05/11/23-05/20/23
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES WATER DIVISION 05/11/23-05/20/23 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 05/21/23-05/31/23
(800) GO PRIME FEE, MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

WATER DIVISION CUSTOM FORMS
Accounts Payable
Description
UMPIRE SVCS FOR SENIOR LEAGUE 6/8/23
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 44 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
120241822 02/03/2023
12106 06/15/2023 Eastern County Newspaper
Group, Inc.
$2,869.10
Invoice Date
36003 05/26/2023
36009 06/02/2023
36022 06/09/2023
12107 06/15/2023 GENERAL BUILDING

MANAGEMENT
$7,827.31
Invoice Date
18334 05/31/2023
12108 06/15/2023 GRM Information Management
Services, Inc
$204.00
Invoice Date
0481522 05/31/2023
12109 06/15/2023 I Copy, Inc (ibe digital) $163.71
Invoice Date
454947 05/19/2023
455103 05/24/2023
455153 05/26/2023
455261 05/30/2023
455334 06/01/2023

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT CED

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT CITY YARD

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT PARKS & REC

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT RIO HONDO PARK

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT SENIOR CENTER
MONTHLY SHREDDING SVCS MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
JANITORIAL SVCS MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description
LEGAL AD-BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT CIP.50075
Accounts Payable
Description
Description
LEGAL ADS- ZONE RECLASS #328
LEGAL AD- PUBLIC HEARING BUDGET FY23-25
REAL ESTATE ONLINE SVCS FEBRUARY 2023
Accounts Payable
user: April Zamora Pages: 45 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
455495 06/06/2023
455525 06/07/2023
12110 06/15/2023 JCL Traffic Services $554.56
Invoice Date
119650 06/01/2023
12111 06/15/2023 Red Wing Shoe Store $400.00
Invoice Date
20230410018986 05/31/2023
12112 06/15/2023 RSG, Inc $2,627.50
Invoice Date
I010386 05/31/2023
12113 06/15/2023 Security Signal Devices $4,206.54
Invoice Date
R-00444114 05/01/2023
12114 06/15/2023 Shoeteria, Inc. $200.00
Invoice Date
0049957-IN 05/30/2023 SAFETY SHOES FOR PAUL HERNANDEZ
ALARM SVCS 5/1/23-7/31/23
Accounts Payable
Description
MHP RSO ADMIN SVCS MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Description

SAFETY SHOES FOR STAFF
Accounts Payable
Description

TRAFFIC PAINT
Accounts Payable
Description

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT CITY HALL WEST
Accounts Payable
Description

MAINTENANCE AND TONER EQUIPMENT SMITH PARK
user: April Zamora Pages: 46 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
12115 06/15/2023 Tanko Streetlighting, Inc $30,342.28
Invoice Date
68940 05/31/2023
68937 05/29/2023
12116 06/15/2023 The Sherwin-Williams Co. $81.96
Invoice Date
6557-7 05/18/2023
12117 06/15/2023 TRC ENGINEERS, INC $12,756.99
Invoice Date
40295 05/08/2023
40045 04/07/2023
12118 06/15/2023 Tristar Risk Management $3,833.33
Invoice Date
112353 04/25/2023
12119 06/15/2023 Uline $3,167.23
Invoice Date
163140053 05/02/2023
164633542 06/08/2023 RUBBER MATS FOR VIP AT EVENTS
Accounts Payable
Description

FLAMMABLE STORAGE CABINET FOR SPECIAL EVENTS GAS CANISTERS Accounts Payable
Description
CLAIMS ADMIN FEES MAY 2023
Description
PROFESSIONALS SVCS THROUGH 4/30/23, TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES PROFESSIONALS SVCS THROUGH 3/31/23, TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADES Description

PAINT SUPPLIES
Accounts Payable

LIGHT POLE INSTALLATIONS
INSTALLATION OF LIGHTS MAY 2023
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 47 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
12120 06/15/2023 Vulcan Materials Co. $377.55
Invoice Date
73662956 05/31/2023
73662957 05/31/2023
12121 06/15/2023 Water Replenishment District of
So. California
$137,112.35
Invoice Date
3853-0423 04/30/2023
22-12-T22-004 06/01/2023
12122 06/15/2023 Willdan Engineering $32,222.50
Invoice Date
00625202 04/11/2023
00624837 03/14/2023
00229017 06/09/2023
00625512 05/22/2023
12123 06/15/2023 WREGIS- Western Renewable
Energy Generation Inf S
$29.00
Invoice Date
WR38703 06/07/2023
12124 06/15/2023 US Bank Corporate Trust
Services
$136,658.34
Invoice Date
Accounts Payable
Description
Accounts Payable
Description

RETIRING RENEWABLE ENERGY CREDITS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 12/30/22, PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE IMP PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 5/31/23, PR INSPECTIONS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/28/23, TELEGRAPH RD BRIDGE
Accounts Payable
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 2/24/23, PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE IMP Description
GROUND WATER PRODUCTION & ASSESSMENT APRIL 2023
WATER TESTING JULY - DECEMBER 2022

ASPHALT FOR STREETS

ASPHALT FOR STREETS
Accounts Payable
Accounts Payable
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 48 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 Number Date Description Payee Name
Transaction
Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 5/24/2023 - To Payment Date: 6/15/2023 Source
06/15/2023 06/15/2023
12125 06/02/2023 US Bank Corporate Trust
Services
$65,542.46
Invoice Date
20230526 05/26/2023
$3,047,152.54
Checks Transaction Amount
$1,974,071.53
EFTs Transaction Amount
$3,047,152.54
Grand Total Transaction Amount
$5,021,224.07
Type EFT Totals: 101 Transactions
CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating Totals
Accounts Payable
Description
CalCard- May 2023
PR WATER AUTHORITY REVENUE BONDS, 1999 SERIES A FOR JUNE 2023 user: April Zamora Pages: 49 of 49 Tuesday, June 20, 2023 To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: JUNE 27, 2023
Subject: APPROVE A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE

RECOMMENDATION BY THE SHERIFF CIVILIAN

OVERSIGHT COMMISSION REGARDING THE

MANDATORY ROTATION OF DEPUTIES
Recommendation:

2. Direct the City Manager to prepare a letter that will be signed by all City Council members and sent to the appropriate agencies and elected officials.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund as a result of this agenda report.

Background:

Law Enforcement and Public Safety Services in Pico Rivera In many cities across Los Angeles County, law enforcement services are provided by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department under a contract. Under this arrangement, the Sheriff's Department provides a certain number of deputies and other personnel to patrol the City and respond to calls for service. The city pays the Sheriff's Department for these services, typically based on the number of personnel assigned to the City and the number of hours worked, including supplemental services and officers.

During the fiscal year (FY) 2022-23, Sheriff’s contract assigned 39.6 sworn officers and two (2) civilian personnel for public safety services in the City. To address emerging issues with homelessness and ensure City parks are safe environments for residents, the City amended the scope of services to assign deputies to assist with homelessness intervention and patrol City park facilities.
3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023

APPROVE A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE SHERIFF

CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT COMMISSION REGARDING THE MANDATORY ROTATION

OF DEPUTIES

Page 2 of 3 ends

In addition to sworn deputies, the City of Pico Rivera has established a pilot program for a Public Safety Coordinator to serve as a liaison between law enforcement, first responders, community groups, and stakeholders to coordinate strategic public safety initiatives and identify additional resources to support public safety services in the City.

Findings and Recommendations of the Special Counsel to the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission Regarding Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques – Mandatory Patrol Deputy Rotations
In November 2021, the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission (COC) directed the Chair of the COC to engage Special Counsel to assist the COC in investigating the existence and activities of problematic deputy groups, often referred to as “deputy gangs” or “cliques,” within the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (Department).

By March 2022, a team of Special Counsel were engaged by the County and the Loyola Law School Center for Juvenile Law and Policy, and the COC launched the investigation of deputy gangs and cliques. The investigation included interviews with numerous members and former members of the Department, and a review of numerous documents, court filings, deposition transcripts, public statements by Department representatives, published reports relating to prior investigations, and numerous relevant media reports.

To date, the COC has conducted over seven public hearings devoted to the investigation, most of which involved the taking of witness testimony under oath pursuant to the COC’s subpoena authority.

The report and recommendations as a result of the Special Counsel’s investigation on behalf of the COC was presented to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in February of 2023 (Enclosure 2). The report, divided into two parts, summarized the findings of the Special Counsel and listed recommendations for Sheriff Robert Luna to consider on the issue of deputy gangs and cliques within the Department. The recommendations fall under four headings: Leadership/Supervision, Policy/Training, Assignments/Rotations, and Accountability.

Upon review of the recommendations within the report, members of the Pico Rivera City Council expressed concerns, specifically with the recommendation that calls for the Sheriff to use his authority to re-deploy and rotate all patrol deputies to eliminate the formation and re-emergence of deputy gangs and deputy cliques.

Discussion:

The City Council recognizes the importance of public safety and the need for effective coordination between law enforcement, community stakeholders, and city officials. The City Council also recognizes the importance of addressing the issue of deputy gangs and cliques; however, requiring a mandatory rotation of deputies will negatively impact CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023

APPROVE A RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE RECOMMENDATION BY THE SHERIFF

CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT COMMISSION REGARDING THE MANDATORY ROTATION

OF DEPUTIES

Page 3 of 3 ends

community policing efforts, further diminish trust in law enforcement, and make it more difficult for deputies to effectively patrol and respond to emergencies in Pico Rivera and in adjacent communities.

Communities such as Pico Rivera build relationships and familiarity with deputies that patrol their communities, establishing trust. Deputies from the Pico Rivera Sheriff’s Station are actively involved in the community and often host public events and forums (Pizza with a Cop, Coffee with a Cop, Youth Programs) where residents can engage and get to know their law enforcement personnel. It is this outreach, engagement, and transparency that has created a positive, trusting relationship between the Pico Rivera Sheriff’s Station deputies and our residents. The rotation of patrol personnel could impede the ability to provide community-based policing, which involves building relationships and trust with the community to prevent and solve crime and could erode our City’s progress in providing a safe place to live play and work for our community.

It takes at least two (2) years before deputies gain the necessary experience and familiarity of the intricacies, culture, and unique needs of a community to effectively patrol and respond to issues. Forcing rotations could make it much more difficult for deputies to effectively respond to calls for service, as it is critical to retain continuity and familiarity between law enforcement and the community.

The recommendations of the Special Counsel to the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission, especially the one that mandates the rotation of deputy sheriff assignments, do not align with the needs of our community.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the resolution (Enclosure 1) in opposition to the recommendation by the Special Counsel to the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission calling for the mandatory rotation of patrol deputies.

Steve Carmona
SC:JG:smc
Enclosures: 1) Resolution
2) Civilian Oversight Commission Recommendation Full Report RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO

RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE RECOMMENDATION OF

THE SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE SHERIFF CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT

COMMISSION REGARDING THE MANDATORY ROTATION OF

SHERIFF PATROL DEPUTIES
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the importance of public safety and the need for effective collaboration and partnership between law enforcement agencies, community stakeholders, and city officials;
WHEREAS, the City Council and the community extend their full support to the newly elected Sheriff Robert Luna and express confidence in his commitment to addressing longstanding issues within the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department; WHEREAS, the City Council and community recognize the initial steps taken by Sheriff Luna to implement strategies aimed at reforming the Department and fostering improved relationships with County stakeholders;
WHEREAS, the Special Counsel of the Sheriff’s Civilian Oversight Commission (COC) has recently put forward its findings and recommendations on the subject of deputy gangs and cliques, particularly one that suggests the Sheriff use his authority to mandate the rotation of deputy sheriff assignments, which the City Council and community find concerning;
WHEREAS, the City Council and community find that such mandatory rotation may lead to the relocation of experienced deputy personnel rather than effectively address the deputy gang and clique issues associated with the previous administration; and, WHEREAS, the City Council and community recognize the challenges faced by Sheriff Luna and believe that efforts focused on attracting and retaining qualified deputies to serve in our communities would be a more productive approach rather than jeopardize critical community policing efforts and trust built between deputies and Pico Rivera residents with a mandatory rotation policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. That the City of Pico Rivera will urge the Sheriff's Civilian Oversight Commission to reconsider its recommendation and collaborate with the Sheriff's Department to explore alternative strategies for addressing the challenges faced by the department while maintaining the experienced deputy personnel in our City.

SECTION 2. That the City of Pico Rivera opposes the recommendation as currently written within the report of the Special Counsel of the Sheriff’s Oversight 3a
RESOLUTION NO. ____

Page 2 of 2 ends

Commission, calling for the Sheriff to consider implementing a mandatory rotation of all patrol deputies.

SECTION 3. That the Pico Rivera City Council expresses its support for Sheriff Robert Luna's ongoing efforts to reform the Sheriff's Department and reestablish positive relationships with County stakeholders.

SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution, and it shall there upon be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 27th day of June, 2023.

___________________________
Erik Lutz, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ ____________________________ Cynthia Ayala, Jr. Deputy City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL

TO SHERIFF CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT COMMISSION REGARDING

DEPUTY GANGS AND DEPUTY CLIQUES IN THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
February 2023
3b
Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission

COMMISSIONERS
Sean Kennedy, Chair Jamon R. Hicks, Vice
Chair
Irma Hagans Cooper
James P. Harris Hans Johnson
Luis S. Garcia Patricia Giggans
Robert C. Bonner Lael Rubin
Brian K. Williams, Executive Director

SPECIAL COUNSEL TO THE COMMISSION
Lead Special Counsel: Bert Deixler of Kendall Brill & Kelly Other Special Counsel included
Bart Williams and Susan L. Gutierrez of Proskauer
Ashley Bowman and Ariel Neuman of Bird Marella
Carolyn Kubota and Ellen Choi of Covington
William Forman of Winston & Strawn (on behalf of Loyola Law School Center for Juvenile Law and Policy)
L. Ashley Aull and Robyn Bacon of Munger Tolles & Olson (on behalf of Loyola Law School Center for Juvenile Law and Policy)
Naeun Rim and Sarah Moses of Manatt
Clark Brown, former General Counsel L.A. County Bar
Richard Drooyan, Consultant
Adam Dawson, lead investigator
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE .........................................................................................................................1

THE EXISTENCE OF DEPUTY GANGS AND DEPUTY CLIQUES IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT.........................................................................3 I. INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................3 II. INVESTIGATION.....................................................................................................5 III. FACTUAL FINDINGS...............................................................................................7 A. History of Deputy Gangs and Cliques..........................................................7 B. Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques Currently in the Department ..............10 C. Obstacles to Eliminating Deputy Cliques in the Department.....................35 D. The Elimination of Deputy Cliques is Constitutionally Permissible............41 IV. FACTUAL FINDINGS SUMMARY...........................................................................43 V. RECOMMENDATIONS TO ELIMINATE DEPUTY GANGS AND CLIQUES..................44 A. LEADERSHIP AND SUPERVISION................................................................45 B. POLICY AND TRAINING..............................................................................49 C. RE-DEPLOYMENTS AND ROTATIONS.........................................................53 D. ACCOUNTABILITY......................................................................................55 VI. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................61 1 PREFACE
In November 2021, the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission (“COC”) directed the Chair of the COC to engage pro bono Special Counsel to assist the COC to investigate the existence and activities of problematic deputy groups, often referred to as “deputy gangs” or “cliques,” within the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (“Department”). Although prior commissions have documented the existence of deputy gangs and cliques over several decades, the COC wished to determine whether such groups continued to exist and to understand their impacts on the Department, its employees, and members of the public it serves.

By March 2022, a pro bono team of Special Counsel were engaged by the County and the Loyola Law School Center for Juvenile Law and Policy, and the COC launched the investigation of deputy gangs and cliques. The investigation included interviews of numerous members and former members of the Department, and review of numerous documents, court filings, deposition transcripts, public statements by Department representatives, published reports relating to prior investigations, and numerous relevant media reports. To date, the COC has conducted seven public hearings devoted to the investigation, most of which involved the taking of witness testimony under oath pursuant to the COC’s subpoena authority.

This Report and Recommendations is a result of the Special Counsel’s investigation on behalf of the COC. It is in two parts: Factual Findings, entitled The Existence of Deputy Gangs and Cliques in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, and Recommendations to Rid the Department of Deputy Gangs and Cliques that fall under four headings: Leadership/Supervision, Policy/Training, Assignments/Rotations, and Accountability.
2 A word about nomenclature used in this Report. Special Counsel has chosen to use the term “Deputy Gangs” when referring to deputy groups engaged in egregious conduct such as violations of law, the excessive use of force, threats to the public or Department members and to use the term “Deputy Cliques” in discussing the broader concerns that the exclusionary subgroups pose to the mission of the Department, the careers and morale of other Department members, and the public, even when their activities do not violate specific laws. The term “Deputy Cliques” has historically been understood to include Deputy Gangs and exclusionary subgroups and their problematic behavior however configured. By using this term in this report, we do not intend to minimize the harm done by these groups to the Department, to other Department personnel, and to the public. The Findings confirm such harms.

The origins of Deputy Gangs and Cliques within the Department dates back decades. They may have started with benign intentions, but history has proved that Deputy Cliques have often evolved into Deputy Gangs whose members not only use gang-like symbols but engage in gang-type and criminal behavior directed against the public and other Department members. These groups, both historically and currently, also exalt the use of excessive force against civilians, harass other deputies, and undermine the chain of command within the Department. However denominated, the existence of these groups and their impact adversely affects the mission of the Department and undermines public trust in the Department.

The Deputy Cliques addressed in this Report and several prior reports have been variously referred to as deputy “gangs,” “cliques,” “subcultures” and “secretive subgroups. ”Deputy Cliques” are Sheriff’s deputies assigned to a particular Department patrol station, bureau, unit, or location in a jail who self- associate, and identify and act as a subgroup that excludes other deputies assigned to the same station, bureau, unit, 3 or jail location. They identify themselves by names such as the Banditos, Executioners, Regulators, Spartans, Reapers, Rattlesnakes, Cowboys, Vikings, Wayside Whities, 3000 Boys, and 4000 Boys. Members often have matching and sometimes sequentially numbered tattoos and use language and gestures associated with street gangs. By their actions Deputy Cliques invariably evolve into Deputy Gangs.

The Factual Findings section of this Report documents the overwhelming evidence demonstrating that Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, still exist and engage in harmful activities in several of the Department’s patrol stations and bureaus. They victimize the Department, its members, and the public.

The Recommendations section identifies the reforms needed to eliminate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques and to extinguish the culture of the Department that has permitted their existence and harmful influence within the Department for the past 50 years. The Recommendations provide an immediate call to action to the Sheriff, the Department leadership and every member of the Department. There can be no more delays!

THE EXISTENCE OF DEPUTY GANGS AND DEPUTY CLIQUES IN THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
The Department currently contains several active groups that have been, and still are, engaged in harmful, dangerous, and often illegal, behavior. Some of these groups have engaged in acts of violence, threatened acts of violence, placed fellow Deputies at risk of physical harm, engaged in acts celebrating officer involved shootings, and created a climate of physical fear and professional retribution to those who would speak publicly about the misconduct of such groups. Publicly released deputy body camera video illustrates such misconduct directed to a member of the public. For that reason, going back 30 years to the Commission led by Judge James J. 4 Kolts, these groups have been fairly referred to as “Deputy Gangs.” Deputy Cliques that evolve into Deputy Gangs meet the definition of “law enforcement gang” in California Penal Code Section 13670.1 The problems they cause
in the Department, however, go beyond their “gang-like” behavior. Deputy Cliques are rooted in secrecy and exclusivity. They undermine the Department’s leadership and supervision, foster insubordination, and are detrimental to the morale of other deputies and staff by exercising power and decision making that is fundamentally inconsistent with the para-military, chain of command structure of law enforcement agencies such as the Department. By exercising influence ordinarily reserved for supervisors and management, such as controlling assignments, schedules, and promotions, their existence within stations, bureaus and units of the Department violates fundamental principles of professional policing. But Deputy Cliques, whether they meet the definition of “law enforcement gangs” must be eradicated as they are the seeds from which Deputy Gangs develop.

While the prior Sheriff publicly asserted that he had acted to eliminate Deputy Gangs, in fact he facilitated their continued presence by, among other things, 1 Penal Code 13670 provides, in pertinent part: (2) “Law enforcement gang” means a group of peace officers within a law enforcement agency who may identify themselves by name and may be associated with an identifying symbol, including but not limited to, matching tattoos, and who engage in a pattern of on-duty behavior that intentionally violates the law or fundamental principles of professional policing, including but not limited to, excluding, harassing or discriminating against any individual based on a protected category under federal or state antidiscrimination laws, engaging in or promoting conduct that violates the rights of other employees or members of the public, violating agency policy, the persistent practice of unlawful detention or use of excessive force in circumstances where it is known to be unjustified, falsifying police reports, fabricating or destroying evidence, targeting persons for enforcement based solely on protected characteristics of those persons… and retaliation against officers who threaten or interfere with the activities of the group. Further, these groups often discriminate on the basis of gender, race and ethnicity in deciding who can become a member of the Deputy Cliques. Such workplace discrimination violates the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and federal anti- discrimination law. 5 appointing known tattooed members of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques to leadership positions in the Department, permitting the revival of emblems signifying membership in such groups and repeatedly relying upon an erroneous statement of law to avoid promulgating and enforcing a policy prohibiting Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques in the Department. The claim that Deputy Gangs no longer exist in the Department is flatly and inarguably false. Moreover, Deputy Cliques continue to exist.

The COC Policy recommendation prohibiting Joining and Participation in Deputy Cliques is constitutionally permissible, and it is factually supported by the investigation and multiple interviews conducted by the COC’s Special Counsel as well as the testimony given in the COC’s public hearings. The COC urges Sheriff Luna to adopt a policy that prohibits deputies from being members of Deputy Cliques and thereby ending Deputy Gangs.

II. INVESTIGATION
As part of the COC’s investigation, Special Counsel interviewed approximately eighty witnesses. The witnesses were current and former Deputies, Sergeants, Lieutenants, Captains, Commanders, Assistant Sheriffs, and Undersheriffs; a former Sheriff; and former law enforcement officials from other law enforcement agencies.

The witnesses also included attorneys representing current and former litigants against the Department and the County and certain of the litigants themselves. Many witnesses were interviewed multiple times.

Special Counsel coordinated with, interviewed and received information from the Los Angeles County Office of Inspector General, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, Loyola Law School and the Los Angeles County Public Defender’s Office.

Special Counsel received and reviewed dozens of depositions and sworn 6 statements, and associated exhibits generated in connection with past and pending litigation involving the Department; multiple media reports; body camera footage; and extensive reports prepared by the Kolts Commission, the United States Commission on Civil Rights, the Loyola Law School Center for Juvenile Law & Policy (‘Loyola Law School Report”), the Rand Corporation, the National Association of Blacks in Criminal Justice, and the Citizen’s Commission on Jail Violence.

Special Counsel attended virtual briefings by the former Sheriff Alex Villanueva, and repeatedly sought to meet with the former Sheriff and his Undersheriff, Timothy Murakami. They declined to meet or to be interviewed. Each was also invited to voluntarily appear and testify publicly before the COC. The former Sheriff declined to do so unless provided in advance with the questions and any documents that would be presented. The Undersheriff declined, asserting that his physical condition precluded his testimony, but not his other duties as Undersheriff. As a result, the COC subpoenaed both the Sheriff and Undersheriff to testify. Each refused, and both are now subject to legal proceedings to enforce the subpoenas and/or to hold each in contempt.

The COC held seven public hearings in which approximately fifteen witnesses publicly testified and numerous members of the public spoke. The overwhelming majority of witnesses who testified did so pursuant to subpoena. Several witnesses would only testify anonymously, and some did so remotely, using a voice distortion device out of fear of physical or professional retaliation. Several witnesses who had agreed to testify withdrew, often the night before the proposed testimony, out of similar fears.

In addition to witnesses who testified publicly, approximately sixty other witnesses were interviewed by the Special Counsel’s team. Many witnesses spoke only 7 after receiving assurances that they would not be identified publicly or even confidentially identified to the COC. The witnesses expressed concerns for their physical safety and the physical safety of family members, many of whom are Department employees. In addition, many witnesses insisted upon anonymity in interviews for fear of professional retribution often described as “career suicide.” Some of the factual findings recited in this Report are the product of these witness interviews.

III. FACTUAL FINDINGS
A. History of Deputy Gangs and Cliques
Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques have existed in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department since at least 1973. That year, an internal Department memo dated December 5, 1973, documented the existence of a group known as the “Little Devils,” and identified 38 members who bore sequentially numbered tattoos of a devil.

In 1992, the Kolts Commission’s report confirmed the existence of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, including a Deputy Gang called the Vikings, in the Department.

After holding evidentiary hearings in Los Angeles in 1993 and 1996, the United States Commission on Civil Rights in 1999 issued a report focusing on the violence and trauma that Deputy Gangs had inflicted on communities of color and people struggling with mental illness, and urged the LASD to take decisive action to eradicate Deputy Gangs from its ranks.

In 2012, the Citizens’ Commission on Jail Violence (“CCJV”) found that Deputy Cliques existed in patrol and on certain floors of Men’s Central Jail (”MCJ” ) and that they contributed to the use of excessive force in the jail. The CCJV’s report contains five pages of recommendations to address the problem.

The Loyola Law School Report documented the Department’s long history of 8 Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques in 2021; and the Rand Corporation also confirmed their existence in its report titled Understanding Subgroups Within the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department in 2021.

The Los Angeles County Inspector General, Max Huntsman, testified before the COC about his office’s report entitled Analysis of the Criminal Investigation of Alleged Assault by Banditos that confirmed the involvement of the Banditos in the severe beating of non-Banditos deputies in an incident at Kennedy Hall in 2018.

As part of its investigation, the COC received and reviewed a September 13, 2004, memorandum from the then Undersheriff William T. Stonich to Sheriff Leroy Baca about efforts to address “inappropriate and potentially damaging behavior” at the Department’s Century Station. Among other conclusions the memorandum reported on rumored unethical activity engaged in by Century station personnel as follows:
“Mexican Mafia”, rumored to be a small select group of deputies of Hispanic decent (sic). They have been accused of holding positions of influence within the station (i.e.: detective, scheduling, watch deputy and field training officer positions) and are alleged to control much of the negative behind the scenes activity such as fund raising through means of unit level extortion for non -sanctioned events, unfair or biased granting of time off requests, controlling patrol and interior work assignments, etc.”
The COC also reviewed an October 1, 2007, memorandum from then Commander Willie Miller to Sheriff Baca reporting on an investigation of a group of deputies named the “Regulators” at Century Station. Among other things, the memorandum concluded that:
“The Regulators philosophy is that if a sergeant, lieutenant, or captain was weak at Century Station they would run over them, essentially speaking, they would run the station as a subculture fraction (sic). 9 They would not respect rank. They openly displayed the Regulators logo of the ‘skull and flames’ symbol on their motorcycles as well as body tattoos.”
The COC also reviewed hundreds of Department documents regarding the 2012 discovery in a patrol car of a written creed for a Deputy Gang named “The Jump Out Boys.” Members of the Jump Out Boys shared a common numbered tattoo that depicts a red-eyed skull wearing a bandana with the letters “O.S.S.” and holding a revolver next to an ace of spades and an 8 of spades, the so called “dead man’s hand” in poker.

Their creed recited that members understand “when the line need (sic) to be crossed, and crossed back” and that they “sometimes need to do things they don’t want to in order to get where they want to be.” It also directed members to keep a “black book” that records the date of every deputy involved shooting that authorized each shooter to embellish his common tattoo with smoke coming out of the gun. Seven Jump Out Boys members were fired, but because there was no clear policy against joining a Deputy Gang at the time, the Civil Service Commission reinstated four of them.

It is indisputable that for nearly 50 years, Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques have existed within the Department and their existence and negative impacts were known to the leadership of the Department. Yet there was no sustained effort during this period to eradicate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques from the Department. All prior efforts were inadequate, lost continuity and failed to eliminate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. Owing to this failure, Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques are embedded in the culture of the Department, either tolerated or ignored. Indeed, during the tenure of Sheriff Baca, the Undersheriff, Paul Tanaka, was a tattooed member of the Vikings. According to numerous witness interviews, former Sheriff Villanueva’s Undersheriff, Tim Murakami, has a Caveman tattoo.

While law enforcement cliques are not unknown in other law enforcement 10 agencies, no other large law enforcement agency in the nation has allowed such cliques to exist and flourish as they have in the Department.

B. Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques Currently in the Department There is at least a half dozen, and possibly more, Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques currently in the Department, primarily at patrol stations. They include the Executioners, the Banditos, the Regulators, the Spartans, the Gladiators, the Cowboys and the Reapers. There are reports that new Deputy Cliques are forming as members of existing Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques retire or otherwise leave the Department.

There is some evidence indicating that Deputy Cliques are re-emerging in the Los Angeles County jails as the 4000 Boys.

Merely transferring members of Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques has not proved particularly effective. After the CCJV’s 2012 findings confirmed the existence of the 2000 and 3000 Boys on the second and third floor of MCJ, many of these deputies were transferred out of the jail to patrol. Many of the 3000 Boys sought assignments to Compton Station and became Executioners; many 2000 Boys sought assignment to Century Station and became Spartans. As discussed below, transfers or rotation of deputies must be much more intentional to avoid aggregating in a new location deputies involved in, or susceptible to influence by, Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques.

All the Deputy Cliques share harmful characteristics. While not all Deputy Cliques engage in identical unprofessional conduct, most share at least some of the following characteristics, and they have done and continue to do certain acts of unprofessional and dangerous policing. Deputy Cliques run the stations or units where they exist, as opposed to the sergeants, lieutenants and the captain who are charged with the duty to run the station; exercise influence over and often decide assignments and shifts, training, and overtime; exclude deputies from the Deputy Cliques, often based on race, 11 ethnicity or gender; intimidate deputies that are not part of the Deputy Cliques; give orders not to provide backup to disfavoreddeputies who are not members of the Deputy Cliques; order work slowdowns if management of a station attempts to rein them in; encourage a “we-they” attitude, not just between them and the public, but with other deputies within the station; operate in secrecy; lie in reports to protect each other; and threaten the public with use of excessive force without justification and belittle deputies unwilling to engage in such acts. Most troubling, they create rituals that valorize violence, such as recording all deputy involved shootings in an official book, celebrating with “shooting parties,” and authorizing deputies who have shot a community member to add embellishments to their common gang tattoos.

Typically, to be invited to become a member of a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique, a deputy must demonstrate “toughness” that is frequently associated with use of excessive force or other forms of unconstitutional policing. Often the euphemistic term “peer leader” is used to describe the members.

Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques also have used and continue to use assaultive behavior against fellow deputies who do not belong to their groups as a show of power and influence. Certain of these altercations have led to public exposure in the media.

The COC investigation uncovered other incidents including threatened use of weapons by deputies upon other deputies.

The pernicious effects of these groups go well beyond assaulting other deputies.

Recent publicly released body camera footage of a deputy threatening to shoot a man in a parked car without any evidence of wrongdoing illustrated in real time gang behavior characteristic of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques interacting with the public served.

Not all members of Deputy Cliques engage in acts of misconduct. Even those 12 members who do not engage in misconduct, however, contribute to the unprofessional influence of Deputy Cliques and their negative impact on the Department and on other deputies. Deputy Cliques have and continue to do great damage to the reputation of the Department, and the public hearings demonstrated that they have unquestionably destroyed trust between the Department and the public it serves.

Membership in a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique is a liability for the County. One of the essential job qualifications of a deputy sheriff is the ability to testify credibly in a court of law. Deputies who belong to Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques that value loyalty to their members over their commitment to the Department and the public are likely to be disbelieved when their conduct is at issue. As Lieutenant Eric Strong, a 22- year member of the Department, put it, “If you are a member of a law enforcement gang, you cannot be trusted, you cannot be relied upon, your credibility is lacking.” Under the principles set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v.

Maryland, such information that bears on the credibility of prosecution witnesses must be disclosed by the prosecution to the defense in criminal cases and is likely discoverable in civil lawsuits.

Deputies sued in civil lawsuits arising from the alleged use of excessive force cost the taxpayers of Los Angeles County tens of millions of dollars in judgments and settlements. It has been estimated that the additional cost to the County in these cases is upwards of $55 million. That number can only rise based upon pending and newly filed lawsuits and administrative claims. In addition to judgments and settlements, the County incurs seven-figure legal bills from outside litigation counsel hired by and paid for by the County to defend the misconduct of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

Set forth below is some of the evidence developed by Special Counsel during the 13 COC’s investigation of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

1. Compton Station
Lieutenant Larry Waldie testified before the COC that he was a tattooed member of a deputy group known as the “Gladiators.” He obtained the tattoo during his initial tour of duty at Compton Station and that another group known as the “Executioners” subsequently ran aspects of that station. Waldie said that Compton was a “fast station,” and it was considered a desirable post for deputies wanting exposure to incidents of crime requiring active law enforcement.

Waldie testified that many of the Executioners had served on the 3000 floor at MCJ. The CCJV noted the existence of the “3000 Boys” at MCJ and recommended that the it be disbanded. It appears, however, that many of the “3000 boys” transferred to Compton Station and formed or joined the Executioners. A witness who worked at MCJ and who insisted on anonymity for fear of reprisal, reported that a new version of the “3000 Boys” operating on the 4000 floor and calling itself the “4000 Boys” currently operates at MCJ.

Another witness currently assigned to the Compton Station disclosed that deputies who had worked on the 3000 floor at MCJ received preferential treatment at Compton. The witness reported being ridiculed based upon gender and race by the scheduling deputy, Jaime Juarez, an Executioner, and that Executioner members regularly discriminated against and ridiculed women.

Waldie testified that Deputy Juarez was the “shot caller” during Waldie’s tenure at Compton Station. The Commission received evidence that Juarez participated in four officer involved shootings. Juarez was subsequently removed from patrol, and interacting with the public during Sheriff McDonnell’s tenure, but was returned to patrol after Sheriff Villanueva took office. Waldie identified Deputies Ruiz, 14 Cuevas, Barajas, Ingersoll, Raisa and Ruben as Executioners. Waldie stated that based upon his observations Executioner membership apparently excluded females and African Americans.

The Commission received a photograph of Deputy Juarez’ truck which depicted an Executioner emblem on a flag. In a deposition in civil litigation brought by Waldie, Deputy Juarez admitted that he had attended approximately seven “inking parties.” He confirmed that Deputies Barajas, Ingersoll, Bray, Jimenez, and Reese attended Executioner inking parties as well. According to Juarez, Ingersoll was the last Executioner to receive an Executioner tattoo.

The Commission also received a photograph of a tattoo of a skeleton holding an automatic rifle on the calf of Deputy Aldama, a self-acknowledged Executioner. Other evidence indicates that, much like the Mafia, there are “made” members of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques who are entitled to wear the tattoo associated with the group. The tattoos typically exalt the use of excessive force and are entirely unprofessional.

Deputy Aldama, and his partner, Mizrain Orrego, were named as defendants in two separate shootings of community members, Sheldon Lockett and Donta Taylor. In each instance the deputies claimed that the victims had guns. In neither case was a gun located and much evidence suggested that in fact neither had guns. The County settled both cases with the families of the deceased for a total amount just short of ten million dollars. Since outside counsel was engaged in each case substantial legal fees were incurred on top of the settlement amounts.

Waldie testified that the Executioners held positions of authority during his time at Compton Station. Those positions included scheduling deputy, training officer, detective, and gang task force membership. Waldie explained that the position of 15 scheduling deputy was powerful because it afforded the scheduler the ability to assign deputies to shifts, vacations and days off, desirable assignments on patrol or less desirable assignments in preferred or less desirable locations.

During 2019, when Waldie served as Acting Captain of Compton Station, Deputy Juarez was scheduled to be removed as scheduling Deputy and transferred from the station. Juarez told Waldie that his successor as scheduling Deputy should be another Executioner, but Waldie declined the request. In response, Juarez led the Executioners in a work slowdown in March 2019, and pressured non-Executioners to adhere to it.

The COC received an internal LASD document demonstrating that during the work slowdown, crime rose significantly compared to the preceding year and compared to the months before and after the slowdown. During the slowdown, arrests dropped precipitously, citizen calls were responded to slowly, and pro-active policing initiatives did not occur.

In addition to the statistical evidence documenting the work slowdown, the COC received the content of a text between Waldie and a deputy confirming the work slowdown directed by Deputy Juarez. The deputy supplying the information insisted upon anonymity: “But please between you and I. This could ruin my career. I don’t want my name mentioned at all please. I can’t have that.” Waldie testified that the culture of the Department created a justified fear among honest deputies that if it were believed that they had reported on the misconduct of fellow deputies, especially those belonging to a Deputy Clique, it would lead to harassment, ostracism, threats, or interference with career advancement.

A deputy who requested anonymity was suspected of cooperating with the COC and has been continuously subject to harassment and ostracism at the deputy’s current station. Another witness who testified anonymously has reported that another 16 deputy, who was wrongly suspected of having provided the anonymous testimony, has been repeatedly harassed at that deputy’s current station.

Waldie testified that after an officer involved shooting the deputies involved participated in a celebratory “debrief” at a bar in Fullerton. Waldie identified the pair of deputies, Ingersol and Barajas, as Executioners. Other evidence suggested that they were not yet tattooed Executioners, but were “chasing ink.” That is, they engaged in “aggressive” activities in the hope of becoming members.

Copies of texts reviewed by the COC revealed that Waldie brought the celebration to the attention of the captain heading Compton Station. Waldie testified that despite the seriousness of the circumstances, the captain did not take any action.

After Sheriff Villanueva took office, the captain was promoted to commander and retired from that position. He declined to be interviewed by Special Counsel’s team.

The evidence demonstrates that community needs in Compton were ignored or responded to slowly to pressure a station leader to act in accordance with the Executioners’ demands, and celebrations of officer involved shootings were neither stopped nor criticized. Waldie agreed that the conduct of the Executioners violated “fundamental principles of professional policing.” During her testimony before the COC, then-Chief, now Acting Undersheriff, April Tardy reviewed this evidence and acknowledged that the Executioners were a “law enforcement gang” within the meaning of California Penal Code section 13670.

2. East L.A. Station
Much public testimony before the COC focused upon the East L.A. Station and particularly on an incident at Kennedy Hall involving a brutal beating inflicted upon junior deputies by senior deputies who were members of the “Banditos.” The behavior can only be fairly described as that of a gang. This episode resulted in widely publicized 17 civil litigation brought by the victim deputies against the Bandito Deputies. Even though the defendants assaulted other members of the Department and did so in an after- hours offsite location, County Counsel approved the County paying outside counsel to defend them.

Former Sheriff Villanueva trained at the East L.A. Station and was widely believed to have shown favoritism toward the station and its deputies. He was roundly criticized for the reservation of front row seats for East L.A. deputies at his inauguration when the Kennedy Hall incident had received much negative publicity and was still an open investigation. He also restored the “Fort Apache, kick in the pants” logo at the entrance of the East L.A. Station. The COC also heard much testimony that refuted his repeated assertion that he had replaced a weak captain with a strong one and had transferred many deputies to address discipline problems. In fact, no deputy was involuntarily transferred out of the East LA Station, and many of the transferred deputies were not Banditos.

Finally, there has been substantial evidence that the administrative and potential criminal investigation into the Kennedy Hall incident was obstructed at the direction of the former Sheriff’s then Chief of Staff, Larry Del Mese, an acknowledged tattooed member of the “Grim Reapers.” Matthew Burson, who retired from the Department as a Chief, testified that when he was the Captain at the Internal Affairs Criminal Bureau he was instructed by Del Mese not to have the investigator of the Kennedy Hall incident ask about “sub-cultures” at the station. Burson understood that Del Mese was conveying an order from the former Sheriff, and he passed the instruction on to Sergeant Jeffrey Chow, who was investigating the incident. It is reasonable to infer that Sheriff Villanueva, despite its obvious relevance, ordered that no questions were to be asked about the Banditos or their role in the Kennedy Hall 18 “beat- down”.

Sergeant Chow testified that he believed the conduct of the assaulting deputies was criminal, but that he was directed not to ask questions about “sub- culture” activity at the station. He understood this to mean that no questions were to be asked about the Banditos/Deputy Cliques and its/their role in the gang style assault on other deputies, and he followed the orders because he worked in a “para-military organization.” After Chow testified, the COC learned of attempts to intimidate him and his wife, Vanessa, a Deputy Sheriff. The intimidation included an unmarked sheriff’s car following Chow home after his testimony before the COC and an undercover car parked conspicuously near the residence. (Captain Angela Walton reported a similar intimidation effort involving the parking of an undercover car directly in front of her home after her public testimony.)
Retired Chief Joseph Gooden described the early portion of his career at the East L.A. station and the presence of members of the “Cavemen” at the station. Despite having a degree from U.S.C. when fewer than 10% of the deputies had four-year college degrees, a Caveman told Gooden that there was “no way” he could become a training officer. Gooden observed that under 2% of the deputies at the East L.A. station wereAfrican American.

Years later, when Gooden was a Chief, he oversaw the Kennedy Hall investigation. Chief Gooden testified that he directed that the investigation be conducted as a criminal investigation, and that determining the motive of the involved deputies was an important part of the investigation. The instruction to Sergeant Chow not to ask questions about “sub-culture” activity in the East L.A. Station was directly contrary to Chief Gooden’s expectation and direction. It was also contrary to investigating the motive for the assault and the standard expected of a professional 19 police force.

The investigative report of the Department’s Internal Criminal Investigation Bureau regarding the Kennedy Hall incident was transmitted to the District Attorney’s Office to consider potential criminal charges. The report failed to mention that the investigating sergeant had been instructed not to ask questions about the Banditos or their role in the assault, even though the evidence related directly to a criminal motive for the attack.

An anonymous witness currently stationed at the East L.A. Station testified using a voice distorter because of a fear of physical and professional retribution. The witness identified current “shot callers” at East L.A. as Deputies Ortiz and Valle. The witness testified that Rene Munoz, one of the defendants in civil litigation relating to the Kennedy Hall beating, was the shot-caller prior to his departure from the East L.A.

Station. The witness testified that all three were tattooed Banditos.

The anonymous witness also identified the broad authority of the scheduling deputy, a Bandito, at the East L.A. Station, who gave assignments, schedules, days off and vacations, assigned areas for patrol and directed selection of training officers and assignment of trainees to them. The witness testified that the power of the Banditos was such that they were able to thwart the promotion of a disfavored deputy to training officer even though the deputy was ranked number one in the County for that promotion.

The witness also testified to various means of intimidation and ostracism inflicted by Banditos upon non-Banditos. This included a locker room argument in which a Bandito pointed his gun at the head of another deputy; the turning of backs when a disfavored deputy entered the hallway or room; and the refusal to answer back up calls when summoned by a disfavored deputy. The witness explained how 20 disfavored deputies received “jackets” i.e., reputational slanders intended to thwart their careers.

Another witness testified that the Banditos assaulted “disfavored” deputies, who would be challenged to a fight. The disfavored deputies would be told that they did not belong in East L.A. and that they were a “zero” as a provocation to a fight. The Banditos would surround the disfavored deputies in groups thus employing physical intimidation. This conduct is characteristic of gang activity. Like other Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, the Banditos exert control by forcing disfavored, non-Bandito deputies to transfer to other stations.

Another witness who insisted upon anonymity described how a training officer humiliated trainees, especially women, at the East L.A. Station. Those efforts included name calling and tossing the trainees’ written work product to the ground with the goal of embarrassing and ostracizing the trainee before peers. According to this witness, the training officer who engaged in such unprofessional, intimidating conduct was a Bandito. The witness was certain that the Bandito’s control of the station was widely known. He stated that Deputy Valdez was the shot caller at East L.A. at the time and that he arranged the deputies’ schedules. As noted, Deputy Valdez was widely known to be a Bandito.

The witness also described a practice of ostracism at the East L.A. Station. When the witness walked into the station the deputies would turn their backs as the witness walked down the hall. The witness explained that Banditos “stepped on the radio” i.e., interfered with the ability to communicate from the patrol car by speaking over the deputy while the witness spoke. The Banditos persistently criticized the witness for a “culture violation.”
The witness reported a refusal to provide requested back up. A specific incident 21 involved a report of a person with a gun in a dangerous part of Boyle Heights. Because of the danger of a night call in that area the witness requested back up, but it was not forthcoming, and the witness abandoned the call. The proffered excuse that the deputies all were “busy” was proved false by review of time records.

A training officer at the East L.A. Station required that trainees keep the car fully stocked with snacks and demanded “good imagination on reports.” That the witness understood meant to lie to justify the acts of the deputies. The witness was informed that the training officer was a tattooed Bandito. The stocking of the car was a form of the “tax” imposed by the Banditos. The trainee had to pay for all meals, drinks and anything else the training officer required.

The witness observed that the Department enabled the Banditos control of the station and that known Banditos received promotions under Sheriff Villanueva. The witness claimed that the Banditos brought gifts to the wife of Sheriff Villanueva to procure promotions or to retain power positions. It was widely believed, and confirmed in testimony by Eli Vera, that the Sheriff consulted his wife on promotions even though she held no official position in the LASD. The witness also claimed that the Homicide Bureau is filled with Banditos.

The witness learned that Banditos had to be Mexican American and that Central Americans could not become Banditos. Another witness confirmed that, with one exception, all Banditos were Hispanic males, and none were women.

Another witness who insisted upon anonymity observed that the Banditos also directed work slowdowns that resulted in increased response times to calls and for arrests to cease. The most recent slowdown occurred because the Banditos believed that the Department’s Internal Affairs Bureau had pursued too many disciplinary investigations of deputies.
22 The witness testified that there were between 12 to 15 Banditos currently in the East L.A. Station, and that they held positions as “acting” detectives and training officers. The witness testified that there were also “associate” deputies who wished to be initiated and were “chasing ink.” One incident that the witness regarded as “chasing ink” involved the transportation of a shooting victim to a hospital. The witness stated that the deputies went off route and assaulted the victim. Such conduct can only be viewed as the act of a gang member and its indisputable harm to the community.

In an interview, retired Chief Gooden recounted that during his year and a half at the East L.A. Station the dominant group was the “Cavemen.” He believes that the Banditos grew out of the Cavemen.

Chief Gooden was one of several witnesses who disputed former Sheriff Villanueva’s claim that he had transferred 36 members from East L.A. for misconduct at the station. The anonymous witness claimed that there were no involuntary transfers of Banditos. No transferees were “overnighted,” i.e., subject to immediate involuntary transfer. Rather the transfers reflected voluntary departures related to deputy requests, promotions, or retirements.

Retired Chief Eli Vera also refuted the former Sheriff’s claim. He agreed with the testimony of Captain Ernie Chavez in a civil deposition that the deputies were transferred from the East L.A. Station for non- disciplinary reasons. One witness said in an interview, however, that a number of the transferees were “whistle blowers” who had objected to the Banditos’ control of the station. The witness described them as “the resistance.”
Another witness who required anonymity described the witness’ tenure at East L.A. Station as one in which deputies who “speak like gangsters” surrounded the witness. The witness described the unprofessional language used on radios, including 23 the use of nicknames and derogatory statements. Further, the witness reported that because the Banditos mistrusted the witness, they would not allow the witness to enter a house when they conducted a search. The witness said that contrary to Department policy, the fact and results of such searches were often undocumented.

The witness also experienced that calls for back up by disfavored deputies were not heeded. Such failures to provide requested back up imperiled the safety of these deputies. The civil case brought by the victims of the Banditos beating at Kennedy Hall included the deposition testimony of Deputy Concepcion Garcia, who witnessed calls for back up ignored by Banditos.

The anonymous witness had justifiable safety concerns. On one occasion, when the witness drove a personal vehicle from the East L.A. station, the witness observed that the lug nuts from the car wheels had been loosened. The witness said that to be part of the East L.A. anti-gang unit it was necessary to be an “inked” member of the Banditos.

The witness also confirmed the practice of a “tax” being levied by senior Banditos upon trainees to pay for food, “fund raising” and other financial demands of the Bandito training officers. The trainees who participated did so because of a fear that they would not get off training.

The witness also was supervised by, or worked with, “Cavemen” and “Regulators” They were Caucasian males in positions of authority. The witness stated that supervisors were well aware of the existence of these groups but did not act to interfere.

Another witness who spent nearly a decade in East L.A. and who also required anonymity for fear of physical retaliation, also described the Cavemen and the Banditos. The witness, said that the Banditos insisted that others “do what they want 24 you to do.” The witness also described the Banditos as “gangs behind the badge.” The witness says that everybody in the Department knows of the Banditos; their actions are not a “secret.”
This witness also confirmed that the Banditos imposed “taxes” on new deputies.

The witness was told by a Bandito training officer to “bring your credit card.” The witness was aware of the tattooed members of the Banditos and believed that there were as many as 80 Banditos during the witnesses’ tenure at East L.A. The witness said the Banditos would use force to discipline non-Banditos they did not like. This too is the behavior of a gang.

The Banditos exploited the junior deputies by, for example, requiring that they write reports for the Banditos and stay on uncompensated overtime if necessary to get the report done. The witness said that the Banditos recruited deputies to “chase ink”, i.e., to do what was necessary to be noticed and “stand apart.” That included writing reports to make problematic arrests appear legal. (Another anonymous witness described this practice as “working backwards.”)
An aspect of “chasing ink” was a desire to get into shootings. These deputies would follow a suspect believed to have a gun so that a shooting would be justified.

The witness said that there was pressure to “get numbers up” from time to time, meaning arrests. The witness was instructed by Banditos that they could always get somebody arrested as “under the influence” and “refused to take a test.” The goal was to raise arrest numbers.

Another witness, now retired after 24 years in the Department, was a training officer in East L.A. The witness ran afoul of the scheduling sergeant, Patty Estrada. The witness described Estrada as a female associate of the Banditos who did their bidding and conveyed favors and punishments on their behalf. The witness had a trainee 25 “pulled” by Estrada and observed that the trainee was assigned to a Bandito training officer.

Another witness testified anonymously about working at the East L.A. station.

Although warned that East L.A. was a difficult place to work due to harassment and hazing, the witness chose to work there anyway and was subjected to this conduct.

Like others, the witness affirmed that the Banditos were an open and notorious gang within the East LA Station. The witness believed that it was appropriate to refer to the Banditos as a “gang” that manifested its power by recruiting desired deputies and isolating others. Having become disfavored, the witness experienced, as did others, dispatch sending the witness a high volume of calls throughout the patrol area.

Additionally, when the witness called for backup, it would not arrive. The witness believed that the inability to receive back up when performing services increased considerably the risks of the work.

The witness was aware of “cigar night.” Those were evenings when female deputies would act to raise funds at Bandito “events” by circulating among deputies who were drinking and playing cards and selling cigars to those in attendance for support of other Bandito “sponsored” events. The witness described these cigar selling efforts as done upon the demand of the Banditos. The witness acknowledged that deputies were pressured to give money upon a Bandito solicitation. That trainees were “taxed” was well known in the station and in the Department more generally.

Gooden stated that when Sheriff McDonnell assumed office, he barred the East L.A. Station “Fort Apache kick in the pants logo.” Gooden regarded the logo as unprofessional and insulting to the East L.A. community. Gooden observed that the logo was reintroduced when Sheriff Villanueva assumed office. 26 3. Lennox Station (Now South L.A. Station)
Recently released shocking body camera footage shows South L.A. Station deputy Justin Sabatine repeatedly threatening to shoot an African American civilian sitting in his car in a parking lot. Several witnesses, including two current Department captains, have asserted that Sabatine was a member of a Deputy Clique. One captain believed that Sabatine was a Reaper. A public report based upon an anonymous source also claimed Sabatine is a Reaper. A second captain believed that Sabatine may not be a Reaper, but rather a member of a newly formed Deputy Clique in the South L.A.

Station. A captain reported learning that Sabatine threatened that there would be a work slow-down in South L.A. if the body camera footage was released.

As proof of the consequences to the Department and the County of gang like activities, the County has already been sued based upon Sabatine’s conduct. The Complaint demands $10,000,000. The County likely will engage outside counsel to represent the County and Sabatine.

The type of conduct revealed in the Sabatine body camera footage is consistent with a lengthy history of gang behavior at South L.A. Station. A current deputy who has served in the Department for more than 25 years insisted on anonymity for fear of physical retaliation. The witness described the activities of the group of deputies known as the Reapers at Lennox Station (now the South L.A. Station.) The witness saw the tattoos of the members, all of whom were Caucasian males. The witness observed that the Reapers now consist primarily of Hispanic deputies.

The witness stated that Reapers were involved in multiple shootings. The witness recounted a conversation in which the witness was criticized after the witness confronted two African Americans, a male and female, one of whom had a gun. The witness apprehended the suspects without firing a weapon. Later a Reaper criticized 27 the witness, and asked “why did you not shoot her?” The Reaper described it as a “freebie.”
According to the witness, another Reaper encouraged the witness to seek a warrant when there was no basis to do so. The witness declined and believes that this was a source of the mistrust of the witness among certain deputies.

A former deputy who served in the South L.A. Station described Carl Mandoyan as the shot caller at the station at the time. The witness claimed that it was widely known in the Department that Mandoyan was a Reaper. As in other stations, the witness noted that unpopular directives were “pushed back” against by work slowdowns. Some of the friction was with a captain who was acting in accordance with a directive from Sheriff McDonnell to “crackdown” on deputy misconduct.

The witness reported that to get into the Reapers one needed to have a “force incident” and look for an opportunity to shoot people. The other condition was that you “not be a rat.”
The witness’s experiences as a non-Reaper included being “slammed on calls.” The dispatcher repeatedly instructed the witness to answer calls for which other deputies refused to provide back up the witness requested. The witness described one incident in which the witness made a traffic stop and asked for a unit to back up. None came and the suspect ran away.

Another deputy who required anonymity described an incident at the beginning of the witness’s career in patrol. The witness pulled over a suspect who was apparently intoxicated and “out of it”. The witness said that the suspect appeared unaware that there was a gun on the passenger side front seat, did not reach for the gun, and did not resist arrest. When reporting the incident and booking the gun a Reaper ridiculed the witness for not shooting the suspect and claiming that he had “reached” for the 28 weapon.

Captain Angela Walton testified that in her 27 years of service there have always been Deputy Cliques in the Department and that they continue to exist to this day.

Walton described her experience at Lennox Station at the beginning of her career when the Reapers were a well-recognized presence in the station. She identified Larry Del Mese, who later became Sheriff Villanueva’s first Chief of Staff, as the “shot caller” at Lennox.

Walton observed that the Reapers were running the Lennox Station, particularly the early morning shift. After Walton obtained a position as a training officer on an interim basis, she was driven to a golf course and told by a deputy Reaper “we don’t like you.”
Walton testified that the Reapers set out to make her fail as a training officer.

She recalled, for example, a trainee who was a father. Walton allowed the trainee to call his children to say good night. The Reapers roundly criticized her for that accommodation and for allowing her trainee to eat lunch.

Walton described an attempt to intimidate her by posting her business card on a bulletin board at the station with a large “X” drawn through it. Further attempts at intimidation were frequent service calls from a Reaper in charge of dispatch. Walton said that the volume of calls alone adversely affected her ability to perform her job.

Walton experienced the scope of the Reapers influence when she delivered a prisoner to the Compton Station. While in Compton, Walton encountered a former colleague, and engaged in social “catch up” conversation. Walton’s brief delay from work for this social purpose was relayed by a Reaper who worked at Compton to a Reaper who worked at Lennox. According to Walton, her conversation with a former colleague demonstrated that the Reaper influence was not confined to a single station, 29 and it was used as a basis for criticism of her by the Reapers as part of their attempt to drive her from the station. When Walton sought a position at the Lancaster Station, she realized that she had a “jacket;” i.e., a negative reputation spread by the Reapers which included this supposed transgression.

4. Century Station
Retired Chief Gooden, who had more than 25 years of service in the Department, described how Century Station essentially operated on its own, apart from the Department’s command structure. He heard from deputies that if there were “problems” that the deputies would “handle that” and there was to be no involvement of the operations leadership of the station.

Chief Gooden recounted that during his tenure at MCJ the “2000 boys and 3000 boys” staged gladiator fights between jail inmates. Another witness stated that the 2000 boys were “heavy-handed white guys” who encouraged the use of force in large numbers at MCJ and eventually transferred to Century Station.

Chief Gooden also testified about the Department employees’ fear of retaliation should they speak out. He recounted female custody assistants explaining their concern to him in connection with deputy misconduct in MCJ.

When Gooden became a captain at Century Station he was concerned about the history of problems associated with the station. He learned that deputies were involved in personnel decisions, including determining who would receive the coveted position of training officer.

There were two problematic groups of deputies at Century Station at the time.

One was the Regulators. The other was the Spartans. Gooden described the competition for control of the station between them and recounted how there was even a dispute over one group taking and refusing to allow the other group to use a 30 station canopy for an event.

A witness requiring anonymity who worked at Century Station for approximately a decade said that the Regulators and Spartans were actively engaged in misconduct.

The witness said that the Regulators’ shot caller was the scheduling deputy. The witness claimed that Commander Kerry Carter and then Chief April Tardy knew of the presence and activities of the Regulators at the station. According to retired Assistant Sheriff Robert Olmstead, the entire Department leadership knew about the Regulators because the Regulators installed a large monument honoring themselves on the premises of the Century Station that remained in place for several years.

The anonymous witness described a Regulator sponsored fundraising poker game to support the Baker to Vegas run. The Regulators used female deputies as “cocktail waitresses” at the event. The female deputies received personal and administrative days off so they could work at the poker game. The witness reported that the Spartans were angered by the event and sought an equal amount of time off.

A Spartan left a threatening note under the door of the captain who denied the request.

The COC reviewed the content of a March 16, 2015, anonymous letter to Sheriff McDonnell that claimed the Spartans’ tattoo “represents ‘putting in work,’ such as unjustified beatings, falsifying reports of beatings, gladiator fighting, and intimidating other employees or inmates who interfered.”
Another witness who insisted on anonymity for fear that the witness’ career would “be over” if the cooperation were revealed, stated that there was a “book” that the witness had reviewed that identified the name and the date each Regulator received a tattoo. The witness said that there were twenty-five identified members.

The book also recited the creed that reflected a commitment to “proactive policing.” 31 The witness described the creed as “propaganda.”
The witness also described the “tax” the witness was required to pay. For example, in connection with the Baker to Vegas run the witness was required by a training officer to pay more than $100 for a photograph of the 1960s “Rat Pack” celebrities.

The training officer mirrored the language of former Undersheriff Paul Tanaka by instructing the witness to “work the gray” and “work backwards,” which the witness was taught meant “fudging” probable cause. The witness used as an example the “teaching” that all searches in high crime areas are to be defined as with “consent.” The witness said that nobody in high crime areas ever consents. The witness said that the goal was to get arrest statistics. When the witness protested “working backwards,” the witness was described by the training officer as “a rat.” That reputation was spread through the station.

The witness said that with the passage of time the Department is filled with “gang” members, including members of the command staff. The witnesssaid that at least 15 of the 25 Regulators have been promoted. The witness asserted that many of the promotions resulted from Undersheriff Tanaka’s efforts to promote favored deputies.

The witness said that the influence of the Regulators affected the goals of young deputies. Because of the perception that the Regulators were in control, young deputies wished to “make their bones” to gain acceptance. The witness said that goal encouraged deputies to get into shootings to establish their “bona fides.” Special Counsel also received confidential information corroborating the assertion of multiple interviewed witnesses that tattooed Deputy Clique members currently hold important positions within the Department. Special Counsel was 32 informed that one specific area of influence is in the Civil Rights and Public Corruption section of the Department. Sheriff Luna has eliminated that section. It was that section which led a search of former Board of Supervisor’s member Sheila Kuehl and current COC member Patricia Giggans.

Chief Gooden recounted that Interim Sheriff John Scott ordered that the Deputy Clique logos be abandoned. Shortly thereafter, however, Gooden learned that there was offsite sale of clothing with the prohibited logos.

5. Lancaster and Palmdale Stations
Angela Walton described her experience with Lancaster Station over several years. She testified that when her Vice Squad participated in an undercover operation, they would not reveal to the Lancaster deputies or supervisors the operation for fear that the suspects would be tipped off. While not specifically tied to Deputy Clique activity, the testimony illustrated inter- Departmental mistrust related to the absence of chain-of-command organizational supervision and the perception that sub-groups had conflicted loyalties.

Walton applied to be the Captain at Lancaster. She was the only “full Captain” applying. Since Lancaster is a contract city, city officials interviewed her for the position. She met with the Vice-Mayor who told her that he had received negative information about her. Walton understood that there was a Reaper at Lancaster Station and that the “jacket” she had obtained almost two decades before prevented her from becoming Captain of Lancaster Station.

Two non-Caucasian witnesses claimed to have been subjected to serial harassment by training officers at Lancaster Station. All training officers are Caucasian.

One of the witnesses asserted that there were “bad stops” that led to searches, most often of people of color. The witness said that young deputies were pressured to write 33 reports of searches in “a certain way” to make the stops legally justifiable even though the reports contained false information. The witness said that the training officers insisted that certain reports be constructed either to conceal actions taken or to reflect things which did not occur. The witness has reported that these assertions are now the subject of an investigation by the Internal Affairs Bureau.

The witness’ statement was consistent with a report issued by the U.S.

Department of Justice in a June 28, 2013, finding that deputies in Lancaster and Palmdale “engaged in a pattern or practice of discriminatory and otherwise unlawful searches and seizures, including the use of unreasonable force, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI.” The Department of Justice went on to note that “Some Antelope Valley Deputies wear tattoos or share paraphernalia with an intimidating skull and snake symbol as a mark of affiliation with the Antelope Valley stations.”
In a deposition in a wrongful death case, Oleg Polissky, a Palmdale Station deputy, testified that he received a Cowboys tattoo and attended a celebration with at least twenty similarly tattooed deputies. A similar tattoo appeared on the leg of a former deputy who was shot by another deputy while on a camping trip. A photo of the victim’s leg was displayed at a Special Hearing of the COC. A witness who required anonymity was told that the shooting was in retaliation for an act objected to by the Cowboys. The retaliatory shooting of out of favor compatriots is classic criminal gang activity prosecuted regularly. Another witness with direct knowledge of the circumstances, and who was the source of the first witness’ knowledge of the shooting, declined to be interviewed.

6. Aero Bureau
Aero Bureau is responsible for the Department’s helicopters. It has a small 34 number of assigned deputies who have the necessary pilot skills and wear a helmet that has as its logo a chicken being choked. The group is widely referred to as the “Ghetto Birds.”
A witness interviewed by COC’s staff described systematic harassment by the three senior Caucasian deputies in the Aero Bureau. The witness described them as a “clique” and the three as “shot callers.” The witness said that there were no African Americans assigned to the Aero Bureau and that as far as the witness knew there had been only one African American ever assigned to the Bureau.

Another witness, a current deputy with 20 years of service who insisted upon anonymity for fear of retribution, confirmed that the Aero Bureau takes pride in the “Ghetto Bird” logo. The witness said that a leader of the Aero Bureau openly stated that he was a Viking and was a founder of the Regulators. Another leader is a tattooed member of the Spartans. The witness described the process of coordinated “humiliation” efforts directed by the shot callers to disfavored deputies. The shot callers encouraged the others at Aero Bureau to ignore disfavored deputies.

The witness described systematic and routine harassment that caused many new deputies to leave the Bureau. The witness observed the shot callers mocking the accent of a Hispanic deputy and said that disfavored deputies had their pictures placed and defaced on bathroom walls.

The action of a small, self-selected racially harmonious sub-group is consistent with evidence regarding how Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques acted in numerous stations throughout the Department. The use of racially charged and disparaging logos is also consistent with their problematic conduct. Such conduct is inconsistent with fundamental principles of professional policing.
35 C. Obstacles to Eliminating Deputy Cliques in the Department Among those who must participate in the solution to longstanding and widespread problem of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques in the Department are the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (“ALADS”) and County Counsel. Neither ALADS nor County Counsel have been helpful in the past.

1. ALADS
Most deputies who are members of ALADS are not tattooed members of a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique. According to the Rand Report as many as 15 to 20% of deputies belong to Deputy Cliques. ALADS should, accordingly, recognize that the elimination of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques is in the best interests of the vast majority of its members.

The Special Counsel’s investigation has revealed, however, numerous instances in which ALADS has protected Deputy Gang and Deputy Clique members. This has included protecting deputies who engaged in gang activities involving serious misconduct against other deputies who presumably are ALADS members. There is no dispute that pursuant to the Myers-Milias-Brown Act and the National Labor Relations Act, ALADS owes a duty of fair representation to all its members. Special Counsel believes, however, that ALADS can meet its obligations without condoning the existence of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, the harm they cause to the Department, or the attendant unprofessional conduct in which members of those groups engage.

ALADS has opposed efforts by the Department to require the disclosure of tattoos affiliated with Deputy Cliques. In one example, ALADS procured a legal opinion that the First Amendment prohibits the Department from barring deputies from having tattoos associated with these groups. That opinion, which is it at odds with the 36 applicable law discussed below, was provided to Sheriff Villanueva, who relied upon it to assert that he was constitutionally unable to restrain the use of tattoos by Deputy Cliques even if they constituted “police gangs” as defined by California Penal Code section 13670.

In a very recent example ALADS contacted a current captain who sent an email advising deputies at his station not to get Deputy Gang/Deputy Clique tattoos because it could hurt their careers. ALADS protested that advice and told the captain to cease and desist from advising deputies about tattoos. Such communication serves both to undermine the command structure of the Department and to normalize open display of Deputy Gang and Deputy Clique membership.

Steve Biagini, a retired 37-year veteran of the Department who served as Captain in the East L.A. station, observed that because of actions by ALADS and PPOA (Professional Peace Officers Association), the supervisor’s union, he could not question an incoming transferee’s “fitness” to serve at the East L.A. station. Rather, if the deputy was on an incoming transfer list, he had no discretion to refuse the transfer.

Similarly, he lacked the ability to transfer problematic deputies from the station.

Biagini blamed ALADS for this limitation on supervisorial discretion and the consequential harm to the Department of requiring unfit deputies to remain in stations where their problems arose.

Michael Gennaco, who was the head of the Office of Independent Review, described the institutional problems attributable to ALADS. He expects that ALADS will oppose more detailed and explicit training of deputies about the dangers of Deputy Clique affiliation, will oppose changes in the transfer and rotation system to reduce the influence of Deputy Cliques at stations and jails, and will not acknowledge the existence of problems associated with Deputy Cliques, notwithstanding the evidence 37 set forth above.

Gennaco used as an example ALADS’ involvement in the Quiet Canon episode, another fight among deputies, some of whom were ultimately terminated. Gennaco said that ALADS ostracized the whistle blowers but backed “to the hilt” the accused.

ALADS’s reaction to the Internal Affairs investigation of the Kennedy Hall incident involved a similar defense of the accused even though the victims were also deputies (and presumably ALADS members).

ALADS also created obstacles to Special Counsel’s investigation. Those include making a baseless contention that the COC has no subpoena power because the grant of that power by Measure R violates the deputies’ collective bargaining agreement with the County. Further ALADS has contacted witnesses subpoenaed by the COC and urged them to seek specific lawyers to assist the witnesses in avoiding testimony. A subpoenaed witness reported a specific direction to call a designated lawyer who would arrange for the witness not to testify.

It is imperative that ALADS supports the elimination of the Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques for the benefit of its members. The repeated gang style behavior of certain Deputy Cliques has led to enormous litigation costs borne, in part by ALADS, to the detriment of ALADS’ members, and significant harm to the Department’s reputation with the public. Each special hearing of the COC included multiple public witnesses calling out gang behavior by deputies and expressing a community fear and hatred of deputies simply because they were members of the Department. The level of anger and mistrust publicly expressed is the tip of a sizable iceberg in the community. Elimination of Deputy Gangs and Cliques is in the best interest of all Department members. The public enmity alone increases the risk of harm to deputies.

If only for reasons of their members safety, ALADS’ should be a leader in eliminating 38 Deputy Cliques and the Deputy Gangs that grow out of them.

2. County Counsel
County Counsel bears some responsibility for enabling Deputy Cliques. After the Kolts Commission issued the first report to publicly acknowledge the existence of Deputy Cliques in the Department in 1992, Judge Kolts recommended that the County establish a civilian oversight board to ensure the Sheriff implemented reforms aimed at reducing uses of force and eradicating Deputy Gangs. The County Counsel, however, issued an opinion advising that a civilian oversight board without the Sheriff’s agreement would violate state law. The Department leadership used this opinion to successfully oppose civilian oversight for many years. During this period without civilian oversight deputy gangs flourished.

The County Counsel has approved the use of County resources to pay by the hour litigation counsel to defend Deputy Gang and Deputy Clique members who have engaged in misconduct far outside the scope of their duties as deputies. Deputies who engaged in an after-hours beat downs of co-workers as an exercise of their power over other co- workers were not acting within the course and scope of their duty and yet they are supported in litigation by the County.

In connection with Lockett v. County of Los Angeles, 18-CV-5838-PJW in a December 2022 “Summary of Corrective Action” an Assistant County Counsel addressing the beating and tasering by Deputies Aldama and Orrego of Sheldon Lockett alleged to have been motivated by the deputies involvement in the Executioners Deputy Gang wrote “to date, there is no information or evidence obtained through any Sheriff’s Department investigation to substantiate this claim[that the use of force by the deputies was motivated by their membership in the Executioners.]” In fact, as was revealed at the hearing, Aldama displayed his 39 Executioner tattoo at a deposition. The Court denied the County’s lawyer’s attempt to keep from the jury evidence of the tattoos of the deputies. The question of the relationship between the use of force, a claim ultimately settled by the County for more than two million dollars, and action in furtherance of gang membership surely was a reasonable inference to be drawn from the history of the Executioners and the disturbing facts that led to the multi-million dollar settlement.

It appears that County Counsel refused to accept the inference in light of the facts publicly known. For example, in the case of the shooting of Donta Taylor by the same deputies, Aldama admitted not only that he had an Executioner tattoo but that up to twenty other deputies had the same tattoo. The Taylor case settled for seven million dollars. It appears that notwithstanding almost ten million dollars in County paid settlements that the County Counsel refused to accept the inference widely drawn by the media and the community.

As Michael Gennaco has made clear, County Counsel has not supported meaningful risk management and other efforts to address the problem of Deputy Cliques on the front end; that is, working to root out the problems before they result in litigation as opposed to paying after-the-fact litigation costs, settlements, and adverse judgments. He recalled a handwritten document describing a Regulator tattoo, which stated that “if you kill add smoke” to the tattoo. Gennaco stated that County Counsel urged no action because of concern that the Department would be sued if it took action in response to the tattoo.

The COC believes that County Counsel is aware that former Sheriff Villanueva relied upon a withdrawn and legally erroneous 2014 opinion to claim that he could not end the tattooed Deputy Cliques. Despite the COC’s request, the COC has been informed that County Counsel has advised the Board of Supervisors not to release an 40 opinion that fully sustains the COC’s recommended policy change. By this simple act County Counsel gave cover to a regime that at minimum tolerated, if not rewarded Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

The conduct of County Counsel creates a reasonable inference that, whatever its intentions, by its actions and inactions it has not provided meaningful assistance to eliminating Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

3. Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office
The District Attorney’s Office has in many instances ignored deputies who participate in Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques and who engage in gang-related misconduct. The Justice System Integrity Division (JSID) of the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office investigates alleged criminal misconduct by deputies, as well as all deputy involved shootings to determine whether criminal charges should be filed. In conducting its analyses, the JSID repeatedly refrains from pursuing evidence that a sheriff’s deputy accused of potential criminal activity or unconstitutional is affiliated with a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique. For example, JSID declined to file criminal charges against four alleged Banditos who severely beat other deputies at an offtraining party at Kennedy Hall. Despite substantial evidence that incident was, in effect, a “gang beat down,” the JSID discounted a gang-related motive, writing:
“Although there was some mention of a subculture of “Bandtios” existing at the ELA station, the Banditos was not a focus of this investigation nor were suspects identified as being part of this subculture.… At no point in this investigation did any witnesses indicate that the Banditos were equivalent to a gang or any type of criminal enterprise.”
The JSID memo is factually wrong—several witnesses interviewed in Special Counsel’s investigation have characterized the Banditos as a “gang”—and betrays a 41 reluctance to pursue any evidence of gang affiliation or a gang-related motive for alleged misconduct. As the Inspector General concluded in his October 2020 report, “Having received what appears to be a purposefully perfunctory investigation by ICIB (which did not gather evidence of the motive behind the alleged assault at Kennedy Hall) the LADA office did not request statements be taken from the uncooperative witnesses or compel a grand jury to compel statements.” The District Attorney’s Office also has failed to require the Department to disclose the identity of known Deputy Gang and Deputy Clique members who are to testify as prosecution witnesses in criminal trials. The District Attorney’s Office does not require Deputy District Attorneys to ask prosecution witnesses whether they belong to a Deputy Gang. The failure to obtain and to disclose potentially exonerating or impeaching testimony favorable to the defense raises significant constitutional issues under Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S.83.

D. The Elimination of Deputy Cliques is Constitutionally Permissible Applicable law permits disciplinary actions, including termination, based upon a deputy’s joining or participating in an internal Deputy Clique. The overwhelming evidence presented at the public hearing, and developed in extensive interviews, demonstrates that Deputy Cliques encourage excessive force, undermine supervision, destroy public trust, are discriminatory, disruptive, and act contrary to fundamental principles of professional policing. With these elements Deputy Cliques are properly defined as gangs within the definition of Penal Code Section 13670. These characteristics make the elimination of the Deputy Cliques constitutionally permissible.

Indeed, they make the elimination of these Deputy Cliques and Deputy Gangs a constitutional imperative.

The activities of and dangers created by Deputy Cliques meet the balancing test 42 required to ban or limit membership in these groups. Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968) established the required “balancing” test. The Ninth Circuit applied the test in Hudson v. Craven, 403 F.3d 691, 696 (9th Cir. 2005). The balance to be weighed is: “(1) [W]hether the speech that led to the adverse employment action [i.e., prohibiting Deputy Cliques] relates to a matter of ‘public concern’; and (2) whether, under a balancing test, the public employer can demonstrate that its legitimate interests outweigh the employee’s First Amendment rights.” Based upon the “public comment” at COC’s special hearings and COC regular meetings and the multiple public reports going back to the Kolts Commission in 1992, the existence and conduct of Deputy Cliques are plainly matters of “public concern.” The COC has heard moving statements by friends and family members of deceased or injured individuals impacted by the activities of Deputy Cliques. The treatment and gang activities of Deputy Clique members toward their brothers and sisters in uniform is a chilling statement of the paramount interest of the Department and the County in protecting its own employees and not tolerating persistent violations of law and fundamental principles of professional policing. The public is well advised to be “concerned” and to view the evidence of such misconduct directed toward fellow deputies and assume that they, as outsiders of the organization, can only expect worse treatment.

In Piscottano v. Murphy, 511 F. 3d. 247, 274-277 (2nd Cir. 2007), the court concluded that correctional officers’ membership in the Outlaws Motorcycle Club, an organization that had engaged in criminal activity, presented an issue of “public concern.” Here, both extensive law enforcement testimony and evidence and the public comments demonstrate that Deputy Clique membership is a matter of public concern. Accord, Godwin v. Rogue Valley Youth Corr. Facility 656 App’x 874, 875 (9th 43 Cir. 2016).

In the balancing of competing interests prong of the test, the employer needs to show that “the employee’s activity is disruptive to the internal operations of the governmental unit in question” and the disruption is significant enough so that it “impairs discipline by superiors or harmony among co-workers, has a detrimental impact on close working relationships…or impedes the performance of the speaker’s duties or interferes with the regular operation of the enterprise.” Melzer v. Bd. of Educ of City Sch. Dist. of City of New York, 336 F.3d 185, 197 (2nd Cir. 2003).

Courts have consistently found that a “law enforcement agency has a heightened need for order, loyalty, morale and harmony which affords a police department more latitude in responding to the speech of its officers than other government employers.” See e.g., Doggrell v. City of Anniston, Alabama, 277 F. Supp. 3d 1239, 1258 (N.D. Ala. 2017); Turner v. United States Capital Police, 34 F. Supp. 3d 124, 143 (D.D.C. 2014); McMullen v. Carson, 754 F.2d 936 (11th Cir. 1985) (Ku Klux Klan membership sufficient to terminate a Sheriff’s deputy.). Further, the efficiency, security, and integrity of the Department law enforcement function easily outweighs the “associational rights” of a Deputy Clique member.

In short, the applicable law establishes that, based upon the facts found by Special Counsel, and the evidence offered in public hearings conducted by the COC that the elimination of Deputy Cliques is well within the constitutional bounds of the Department. Not only is it permissible, but it is also a necessity.

IV. FACTUAL FINDINGS SUMMARY
Special Counsel’s investigation of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques in the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department demonstrates that it is time to eradicate this 50-year plague upon the County of Los Angeles, its residents and the Department’s employees 44 who do not belong to, or wish to be associated with, the Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques. The fine distinction, if any, between “Deputy Gangs” and “Deputy Cliques” is not important. The evidence has shown that Deputy Cliques regularly devolve into discriminatory, exclusionary, and dangerous associations that challenge the core goals of law enforcement.

Accordingly, Special Counsel sets forth below recommendations to the COC to urge Sheriff Robert Luna to accomplish this goal. The COC should work with the Sheriff and the Department in facilitating enactment of the recommendations and monitoring the results.

V. RECOMMENDATIONS TO ELIMINATE DEPUTY GANGS AND CLIQUES On February 14, 2020, the COC passed a resolution recommending that the Department enact a policy “prohibiting joining and participation in deputy cliques.” A copy of the resolution and preamble is attached as Exhibit A.

The COC defined Deputy Cliques “as groups of Sheriff’s deputies within a particular patrol station, bureau or unit who self- associate as a subgroup to the exclusion of others in their station or unit.“ The term “Deputy Cliques” when used within the Department was intended to minimize the problem created by such groups.

The harmful effects of groups of deputies who self-associated and acted to exclude other deputies by identifying with symbols and names designed to separate themselves from the Department had a principal focus upon the harm caused to the Department and to excluded members. Special Counsel urges the COC to reiterate its request that the Sheriff enact a policy prohibiting deputies from joining, participating in or soliciting others to join a Deputy Clique.

However, Special Counsel urges the COC to go further. As expressed above, as defined in the COC proposal, the term “Deputy Cliques” encompasses subgroups that 45 engage in misconduct directed against the community such as excessive force and violations of constitutional rights. The factual investigation has revealed widespread, deliberate misconduct that at minimum violates fundamental principles of professional policing and in many cases appears to violate the law. The time has now come for a policy that expressly prohibits not just the internally harmful effects of Deputy Cliques, but the external, community harmful acts of Deputy Gangs. Such harmful acts include falsified police reports, unlawful searches and seizures, misuse and excessive use of force and discriminatory enforcement of law. Proof that the community, particularly the communities of color, are suffering because of gang behavior is epitomized in the recently released body-camera footage of Deputy Sabatine as he exercised his authority by pointing a gun at an African American man sitting in his parked car without any evidence of a crime.

Now is the time to eliminate all these problematic groups, Deputy Cliques and Deputy Gangs. The factual findings compel the COC to urge the Sheriff to adopt the following recommendations:

A. LEADERSHIP AND SUPERVISION

1. The Sheriff must clearly, promptly and unequivocally articulate his vision, policies, and objectives in addressing the problem of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, and their adverse effects on the community and the Department need to be eliminated. This is easier said than done, but it will never be done unless the Sheriff promptly announces that Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques will no longer be tolerated. He should make clear that this is a top priority, and he should state his intention to make this happen immediately. He must also promptly adopt policies calculated to achieve this goal and see that these policies are enforced. 46 2. Adopt a policy that clearly prohibits deputies from participating in Deputy Gangs, as defined in Penal Code Section 13670.

Special Counsel’s investigation has revealed that, despite 50 years of known Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques within the Department, these problematic groups continue to operate at several of the Department’s patrol stations, engage in gang like activities and no Sheriff has adopted a policy banning participation in such groups.

Moreover, the State legislature has mandated that every law enforcement agency in the State of California “shall maintain a policy that prohibits participation in law enforcement gangs and make violation of that policy grounds for termination.” PC Section 13670(b). Moreover, the legislature has defined the term “law enforcement gang.” The current Sheriff’s predecessor failed to implement a policy banning law enforcement gangs within the Department. Such a policy should be adopted without further delay.

3. Adopt a policy that prohibits deputies from joining, participating in and soliciting others to join Deputy Cliques.

Given the Department’s long history of exclusionary deputy subgroups, it will not be enough merely to prohibit participation in deputy or law enforcement “gangs.” Ending this problem requires a prohibition against joining and participating in Deputy Cliques. In April 2021, the COC proposed that the Department adopt a policy that prohibits deputies from joining, participating in, or soliciting others to join a Deputy Clique. The COC’s proposed policy was accompanied by a preamble that explained the need for such a policy and provided definition to the term Deputy Clique.

As noted above, Special Counsel urges that the Sheriff adopt the COC’s proposed policy. Violators of the policy would be subject to discipline, up to and including termination. The indispensable element to ending this 50-year harm to the 47 Department and the public is adopting the recommended policy to send a strong message that belonging to a Deputy Clique is no longer going to be tolerated, that gang behaviors are a thing of the past and this Sheriff is fully committed to rid the Department of these groups.

All Deputy Gangs have sprung from Deputy Cliques, and the clique-culture is deeply embedded in the Department. This cancer in the Department must be excised.

4. The Sheriff should develop a departmentwide initiative to end Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

As noted above in the Factual Findings, Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques are secretive, exclusive, and often employ intimidating, unprofessional, or controversial graphics, including body tattoos. They diminish the public’s trust in the Department, undermine supervision and the chain of command, are detrimental to the morale of other Department members, and negatively impact the Department’s effectiveness and professionalism in executing its mission. The elimination of these groups requires buy-in at all levels of the Department. The Sheriff should announce a department-wide initiative banning Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. All executives, managers, and supervisors must be openly and unequivocally committed to conveying the Sheriff’s policy, and objectives to Department personnel. As the Rand study stated, “Culture eats policy.” The Sheriff’s leadership teammust change the culture of stations, jails, and other bureaus or units where these groups exist.

5. The Sheriff should seek the support of ALADS and PPOA, for his vision, policies and objectives regarding Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

ALADS and PPOA need to be part of the solution and recognize that the elimination of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques is in the overall best interests 48 of their members.

6. Any captain who is unable or unwilling to support the Sheriff’s policy without reservations should be subject to appropriate discipline ranging from transfer to a less critical position with little or no presence of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques to
termination for insubordination in the Sheriff’s considered judgment and pursuant to required due process.

7. The Department should consider assigning a senior captain and a newly promoted captain to larger, high activity stations to ensure maximum supervision and mentoring of lieutenants and sergeants while retaining full accountability within the paramilitary structure of the Department.

Although a single captain heads Sheriff’s patrol stations, there is a precedent for having two captains oversee a facility in the Custody Division. MCJ, Twin Towers Correctional Facility, and North County Correctional Facility all have two captain organizations—one for operations and one for administrative functions. Assigning two captains to larger, busier patrol stations, particularly those with a history of entrenched Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, will enhance the ability of captains to address the continuing problem of these groups and help ensure that such groups will not be formed in the future. If the Sheriff does not believe a two-captain approach is well advised, he should report his reasons to the COC.
49 B. POLICY AND TRAINING

1. As set forth in recommendations A (2) and A (3) above, the Sheriff should adopt and promptly implement a clear policy to address the need to eliminate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques and prohibit tattoos that depict violence which must be supported, and explained by the Sheriff’s leadership team.

As defined earlier in this Report, a Deputy Clique is an association of deputies within a station or unit that is secretive and invidiously exclusionary and often adopts images, including matching tattoos depicting violence or the use of deadly force. These sub-groups have been fairly and frequently defined as Deputy Gangs. As stated in Recommendations No. A (2) and A (3) above, the Sheriff should immediately bar all deputies from joining, participating in, or soliciting others to join Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. In addition to adopting this policy, the Sheriff should promulgate additional polices to help eradicate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, including a policy that prohibits new deputies hired after the date of the issuance of Recommendations A (2) and A (3) from having tattoos that depict violence, the use of deadly force or any iconography that might reasonably be found offensive to the public. Current Department members should also be prohibited from acquiring such tattoos after the date of the issuance of the policy. Any current Department member who acquired a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique tattoo prior to the adopting of the policy should be required to ensure that it is not visible while the member is on-duty, on Department or County property, or is representing the Department away from the workplace.

A review of stations and jails should be conducted to determine which facilities have unprofessional station/jail/bureau logos. Unit commanders should be 50 accountable for the removal of decals, flags, bumper stickers, decorations, or other depictions of unprofessional symbols inappropriate for representing Department units.

All managers and supervisors must be responsive to the existence of graphics or other symbols representing prohibited Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques or offensive station/jail/bureau logos such as “Ghetto Birds” or “Ft. Apache.” They should be removed, and misconduct investigations should be initiated to determine which personnel are responsible for such graphics or symbols if they reappear in the future.

2. The Department should investigate violations of the policy banning joining or participating in Deputy Gang and Deputy Cliques and refer violations for discipline.

A primary consequence of any violation of the Sheriff’s policies regarding Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques should be a misconduct investigation followed by appropriate discipline which should range from suspension through demotion to discharge consistent with due process. Department personnel should also be advised that the Department will enforce Penal Code Section 13670.

3. The Department’s leadership team should consistently and recurrently emphasize the adverse career consequences of creating or joining a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique.

Although this task belongs to personnel of every rank, the time commitment must increase with each successively lower rank. Notwithstanding the importance of a captain-level manager to set the tone for deputies, lieutenants and sergeants, lieutenants and sergeants spend the most time with deputies. They therefore must be most accountable for communicating to deputies under their supervision the adverse consequences of becoming involved with Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. Captains ultimately are responsible for and must be held accountable for the performance of 51 lieutenants and sergeants.

4. The Department must implement a procedure for notifying the District Attorney’s Office if a deputy testifying as a witness participates in a prohibited Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique.

Compliance with Federal and State law, including compliance with Brady v.

Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83, requires the District Attorney’s Office to disclose if a deputy testifying as a prosecution witness participates in a prohibited Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique that might bear upon the witnesses’ credibility. The confidentiality of law enforcement personnel files does not relieve the prosecution of its constitutional obligation to disclose impeaching information for any deputy testifying as a prosecution witness. Sheriff Luna and his designees should consult with the District Attorney’s Office to devise an appropriate procedure for the Department to notify the District Attorney’s Office that a deputy is participating in a prohibited Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique so that prosecutors can make the required disclosures, if any, to the defense.

5. The Department should actively investigate violation of the policy prohibiting joining, participating in or soliciting deputies to join Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques
Sheriff Luna should remedy the Department’s longstanding failure to investigate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. After Recommendation No. 2, above is adopted, the Department should make reasonable efforts to learn whether deputies continue to participate in such groups, as the Department did in 1973 with the Little Red Devils and in 2013 with the Jump Out Boys.
52 6. The Department should train supervisors how to mentor deputies about the adverse consequences of involvement in Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

In 2016 the Department initiated a departmentwide mentoring program for deputy personnel named the “Sergeants’ Mentoring Initiative.” The objective of the program was to equip and inspire the sergeants to provide to their deputies meaningful, practical, recurrent mentoring about decision-making and conduct in law enforcement and custodial services. The program was designed to (1) emphasize the high aspirations associated with public safety services, (2) stress the importance and difficulty of the decisions required of peace officers, (3) acknowledge the temptations and pressures prevalent in law enforcement, and (4) enhance deputies’ capacity to apply foresight, perspective and wisdom to their decision- making and conduct.

7. The Department should implement a series of community meetings involving patrol station captains, commanders, and chiefs to ascertain the impact of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques on community relations.

The Department should implement at every station a Community Advisory Committee (“CAC”). The committees should consist of community members who have been vocal in their criticisms of law enforcement in addition to station “boosters” who volunteer formembership.

The periodic meetings should be attended by committee members, other members of the community, and station personnel, including the captain, dedicated lieutenant, sergeants, and special assignment and other deputies as necessary. These meetings constitute excellent forums for Department personnel to learn about community concerns. The topic of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques must be an 53 agenda item of these meetings.

C. RE-DEPLOYMENTS AND ROTATIONS
Special Counsel recognizes the complexity of the Department, as well as the difficulty of managing the second largest local law enforcement agency in the country, with its large geographical area, responsibilities for operating the largest county jail system and the largest local court system in America and its duty to police over four million residents.

Special Counsel also recognizes that re-deploying or transferring deputies who belong to a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique from one unit or patrol station to another has in certain circumstances resulted in moving but not necessarily solving the problem. The clearest illustration of this was the transfer of substantial numbers of deputies who were members of the 2000 and 3000 Boys to the same patrol stations they selected as their preferences, i.e., Compton and South L.A. Stations, respectively.

Nonetheless, the use of the Sheriff’s authority to re-deploy, transfer and rotate assignments is a valuable tool that can help eliminate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques within the Department and, importantly, preventing their formation and reemergence.

In interviewing non-Department law enforcement managers, as well as former Department leaders, Special Counsel recognizes that other law enforcement agencies use re-deployment and assignment rotation to minimize the risk of problematic officer or deputy groups forming in those agencies. It is an available and appealing strategy here. While not a panacea, it would provide an additional remedy and the mere announcement of the policy could serve a prophylactic effect.

Moreover, the evidence adduced demonstrates that the Department’s decentralized station-based structure has played a significant role in fostering Deputy 54 Gangs and Deputy Cliques. Deputies’ loyalties extend to the station rather than to the Department as a whole. Indeed, tattoos often are associated with the first or “home” station of the deputy.

At a minimum, the Sheriff should provide a report to the COC on his perception of the viability and likelihood of success of the rotational plan set forth below.

Special Counsel urges that the Sheriff implement the following recommendation for re-deployment and periodic rotations of deputies within patrol and custody:

1. The Sheriff should use his authority to re-deploy and rotate deputies based upon the needs of the Department for the Department to eliminate the formation and re-emergence of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

The Sheriff should consider making such re-deployments or transfers within a geographic patrol or custody division, where possible, to avoid undue hardships. The Sheriff should also consider rotating all patrol deputies (after completion of field training) no later than the end of their first year in patrol to another patrol station within the Division. The Sheriff should also consider rotating all patrol deputies in periodic rotations, no longer than every five years, or sooner, to another station. The CCJV recommended and the Department implemented frequent rotations of deputies within the facilities of the County Jails. The rotational policy played a role in breaking up of the 2000 and 3000 Boys and reducing excessive force in MCJ. The rotation of deputies serving in Custody divisions should continue.

To effectively use the Sheriff’s authority to re-deploy, Unit Commanders should take necessary actions to address the problem of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques under their commands, including recommending to their Chiefs transfers of problematic deputies. Captains must be focused upon the rotation options and actively 55 participate in informing Commanders and Chiefs of the utility and results of such transfers.

2. The Department should re-assess the dual career track for Custody/Court Services and provide a written report to the COC explaining what factors impede implementation.

Having more deputies in Custody or Court Services who want careers in those Divisions may allow other deputies to go directly to patrol from the academy or shorten the time that other deputies spend in Custody after the academy.

3. The Department should assess the feasibility of first assignments to patrol rather than jail facilities and provide a written report to the COC explaining what factors exist, if any, impede
implementation.

D. ACCOUNTABILITY

1. The Sheriff should ensure that senior executives and unit leaders, notably captains and commanders are implementing the Sheriff’s policy, vision and objectives regarding Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

A segment of the weekly Executive Planning Council meeting (Sheriff, Undersheriff, Assistant Sheriff, Division Chiefs and various staff members) should be devoted to discussion of the progress of the initiative to end Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. Identified obstacles should be remedied quickly.

2. The Office of Inspector General should monitor implementation of the policy banning, joining or participating in Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

Because of the imperative of implementing policies to eliminate Deputy Gangs 56 and Deputy Cliques, Special Counsel recommends that the COC request the Office of Inspector General to deploy its resources as additional “eyes and ears” to ensure the policy recommendations A (2) and A (3) are implemented fully and with alacrity.

3. Promotional considerations should include an evaluation of evidence that a member under consideration for a promotion is currently involved in a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique, including the nature and extent of the member’s involvement and whether it was before or after the date of the policy issued by the Sheriff.

Past administrations have promoted tattooed Deputy Gang members to the highest levels of leadership in the Department. Most notably, Sheriff Baca promoted Paul Tanaka, a tattooed Viking, to Undersheriff. More recently, Sheriff Villanueva promoted Timothy Murakami, a tattooed Caveman, to Undersheriff and Lawrence Del Mese, a tattooed Grim Reaper, to Chief of Staff.

Promoting Deputy Gang members into leadership positions reinforces the power of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques and undermines the ability of officials to implement reforms aimed at eliminating them within the Department. For example, former Undersheriff Tanaka’s recommendation encouraging investigative tactics “close to the line”and “in the gray area” became part of the Jump Out Boys creed.

Current or former Deputy Gang and Deputy Clique members in leadership positions will have difficulty enforcing new prohibitions against other deputies joining a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique because their own tattoos and past participation renders them vulnerable to accusations of, at minimum, hypocrisy. Former Chief of Staff Del Mese testified that he had his Reapers tattoos removed at about the same time as the former Sheriff appointed him Chief of Staff because he understood that the tattoo had come to be a “liability” and “a bad look.”
57 Consequently, the Department should inquire if a deputy under consideration for a promotion is or was Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique affiliated and must carefully evaluate the Department wide implications of promoting those who actively participated in such groups.

4. The Department should include a standard set of questions regarding a deputy’s current affiliations with Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques in the use of force review process and in administrative and internal criminal investigations.

This recommendation does not assume a per se causal connection between membership in a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique, or the fact that a deputy has a tattoo reflecting involvement in such a group, and unlawful use of force or misconduct. It is, however, important to recognize that the community widely assumes such a causal connection.

Members of communities policed by Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques widely infer a connection between such groups and excessive uses of force. The U.S.

Commission on Civil Rights report, the Loyola Report and the report of the National Association of Blacks in Criminal Justice noted that stations with active Deputy Gangs have significantly more deputy involved shootings than stations without Deputy Gangs, even when the overall crime rates in the station-districts are comparable.

The questions must enable an assessment of the possibility or likelihood of a connection, without any presumption. If there is evidence indicating even a possible connection between a deputy’s membership in a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique and a use of force incident or misconduct, investigative steps should be taken to determine the nature and extent of the connection. In any such cases, the Office of the Inspector General should be notified and asked to monitor the progress of the investigation. 58 5. The Department should ensure that captains are notified of deputies involved in force incidents or personnel misconduct investigations who have affiliations with Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques, including tattoos associated with such groups.

The Department should codify this recommendation as a rule in the Department Manual of Policy and Procedures. The responsibility for making this notification will normally fall to an investigator at the captain’s own unit of assignment, or to an Internal Affairs Bureau or to Internal Criminal Investigations Bureau investigator.

However, anyone who obtains such knowledge must promptly notify the concerned captain, either directly or through the chain of command.

6. The Department should ensure that the CompStat process for risk management indicators regarding the existence of Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques within a patrol station or other Department unit is implemented and is effective in assessing the risk mitigation efforts of unit commanders.

The Department previously instituted a CompStat process, also referred to as the Sheriff’s Critical Issues Forum (SCIF). The Department initially used it primarily in patrol divisions, but later extended to every division involved with large scale risk management issues. LAPD has successfully employed a CompStat process that allows measurable results. Such statistics driven analyses can assess unit commanders’ efforts to successfully manage their responsibilities. SCIF or other statistics driven analyses will assist in the responsible operating of the Department and provide another forum for evaluating progress on efforts to end Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. The Department should track force incidents by shifts or deputy partners, checking for, and assessing, patterns that may indicate the need for re-assignments, transfers or, 59 discipline.

The Department should implement a “performance mentoring” process, overseen by Risk Management Bureau (“RMB”). The object of the program should be to identify “at-risk” employees by means of the automated “early identification and intervention system”.

Active management will determine the cause and the means of rectifying patterns of problematic conduct. Where leadership perceives the behavior as curable and non-recurrent, a mentoring program specifically designed to help the employee avoid future misconduct should be enacted.

7. The Department must ensure that captains hold sergeants and lieutenants accountable for deputies under their supervision involved in Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

It is essential that captains and lieutenants back up sergeants who face insubordination from members of Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. Fulfilling this recommendation is a fundamental duty of captain- and lieutenant-level managers.

They must assess lower ranking managers and supervisors as to their commitment to convey, support and enforce the Sheriff’s vision and intentions about Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques. Failure on the part of a captain to meet this obligation should be grounds for transfer or other appropriate employment action.

8. The Department must ensure that sergeants actively and recurrently mentor deputy personnel and enforcement of the policy prohibiting Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques.

For sergeants to succeed in conducting the policy prohibiting Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques they must be supported by the chain of command. The persistence of these groups is due in part to sergeants perceiving that higher ranking officers will not 60 support them. With that perception, much of the incentive for a sergeant to actively seek to eliminate such groups is removed. Creation and systematic use of a data base tracking the date, time, setting, duration, topics covered, personnel in attendance, and identity of mentor will allow assurance that the policy of the Sheriff is reenforced by those closest to the deputies who might consider participation in a Deputy Gang or Deputy Clique.

9. The Sheriff should flatten the chain of command by eliminating at least one layer of supervision between him and the captains running patrol stations.

As noted earlier in this Report, the Department’s decentralized station- based structure has played a significant role in fostering Deputy Gangs and Deputy Clique.

Deputies’ loyalties are extended to the station rather than to the institution of the Department as a whole.

Despite some Sheriffs’ prior efforts to eradicate Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques some patrol station captains where these groups have flourished have found it easier to do nothing than take them on. The COC interviewed several captains of stations with widely known, active Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques who professed to know nothing about them despite extensive media coverage of scandals and widespread awareness of deputies of their presence. Because of the relative ease of the “do nothing” choice, information has not consistently flowed up to Commanders, Chiefs, and Assistant Sheriffs. That must change. Shortening the chain of command will assist the Sheriff in seeing that his policies will be enforced.

Currently, there are six layers of reporting from a Captain of a Patrol Station to the Sheriff (Captain to a Commander to a Chief to an Assistant Sheriff to the Undersheriff to the Sheriff). This top-heavy structure has led to a level of autonomy at 61 certain patrol stations that has contributed to the continuation of these groups. Some have equated patrol stations to functioning more like fiefdoms than integral parts of a command structure where policy is implemented throughout the Department.

This level of autonomy would be ameliorated by a shorter chain of command which the Sheriff could accomplish in a number of ways. At a minimum, the Assistant Sheriff for Patrol Operations should be a direct report to the Sheriff.

10. The prohibition against joining or participating in Deputy Gangs or Cliques should be a condition of employment.

Once the Sheriff adopts Recommendation No. 2, above, non-participation in Deputy Gangs or Deputy Cliques should be an express condition of employment. Such a condition will make clear from inception what will not be tolerated by the Department.

VI. CONCLUSION
Special Counsel respectfully urges the COC to consider the factual findings and recommendations in this report and to deliver the report to Sheriff Luna for his consideration.

There can be no doubt that Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques have been, and still are, responsible for undermining discipline, morale, and safety of the public and Department personnel. Deputy Gangs and Deputy Cliques, as the seed from which Deputy Gangs grow, must be eliminated. Sheriff Luna has an opportunity to set the Department on the right path in the best interests of the Department and the community. Special Counsel recommends that the COC adopt the Report and Recommendations and deliver it to the Sheriff.

EXHIBIT A

To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: June 27, 2023
Subject: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING

BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND
CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND

APPROVAL OF UPDATED RESERVE POLICIES
Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution adopting the fiscal year (FY) 2023-24 operating budget and Five-Year Capital Improvement Program;

2. Approve the FY 2024-25 operating and capital budget; and

3. Approve a resolution adopting updated General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies.

Fiscal Impact:

The Proposed Budget (Enclosure 1) includes $151,307,953 in total revenues and $154,663,323 in total expenditures for FY 2023-24 and $146,736,764 in total revenues and $154,669,681 in total expenditures for FY 2024-25. The General Fund (GF) portion of this Proposed Budget totals $59,564,653 in revenues, $59,564,653 in expenditures for FY 2023-24, and $61,240,769 in revenues, $61,240,769 in expenditures for FY 2024-25.

Background:

The development of the City of Pico Rivera’s Proposed FY 2023-25 Two-Year (Biennial) Budget began in December 2022, just as the FY 2021-22 financial statement audit was being finalized. The Biennial Budget is a road map for anticipated future revenue and planned expenditures, allocating resources and reflecting the City Council's priorities and policies for two (2) fiscal years. The Biennial Budget also serves as an important communication tool, ensuring the City of Pico Rivera (City) operates in a fiscally responsible and transparent manner and that resources are allocated effectively to meet the community’s needs. Using the City Council Strategic Priorities as a guide, the 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023 ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 2 of 16 ends

discussion below provides the framework for developing the revenues and expenditures for FY 2023-25.

Guiding Principles
The following City Council priorities are the governing principles that establish the roadmap for constructing our FY 2023-25 General Fund Operating Budget:
• Fiscal and Organizational Sustainability ensures we have the financial, human, and technological resources needed to carry out the remaining priorities and to be adequately padded for unforeseen economic downturns. • Economic Development and Land Use are key to revenue enhancement, strengthening the City's fiscal stability, encouraging the development of underutilized space, planning for growth, and engaging businesses to transform the City as an economic and cultural hub.
• A dedication to Infrastructure ensures that we provide the community with safe and well-maintained facilities, roads, and utility systems; and that we plan, fund, build, and maintain the reliable and cost-effective infrastructure that enhances the quality of life.
• This City also stressed prioritizing Health, Wellness, and Safety to create a safe and thriving City with low crime and high standards for health and wellness. • An ongoing commitment to Community Engagement to foster a connected, collaborative, and actively participating City and workforce.

Based on the City’s strategic priorities and guiding principles above, the FY 2023-25 has been developed using thoughtful and fiscally responsible balancing measures to provide exceptional services to our community and ensure ongoing attention to city facilities and infrastructure.

On January 24, 2023, the City Council adopted the recommended Budget Calendar with the following key dates:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 3 of 16 ends

The Preliminary Budget for FY 2023-25 was successfully presented on each of the planned dates to the City Council as follows:
• April 18 Study Session – Proposed Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) • May 9 Study Session – FY 2023-25 Proposed (Preliminary) Operating Budget • June 13 Public Hearing – FY 2023-25 Proposed (Preliminary) Operating Budget and Five-Year CIP
On May 9, 2023, a Study Session was held to provide a first look at the Preliminary FY 2023-25 Operating Budget, emphasizing and discussing the General Fund and Enterprise Funds’ Maintenance and Operations (M&O) budget. On June 13, 2023, a Public Hearing was held to provide the City Council an additional opportunity to provide input on proposed expenditures pertaining to the organizational structure. It also serves as a platform for citizens to provide input and feedback on allocating municipal funds.

Discussion:

We are now at the last step of the process to adopt the FY 2023-24 Operating and Capital Budget, approving the FY 2024-25 Operating and Capital Budget and the FiveYear CIP. This report includes the work, discussion, and results of each presentation made to the City Council, as well as adjustments made to the FY 2023-25 Proposed Budget and Five-Year CIP as a result of those discussions.

General Fund
The City proposed balance General Fund budgets for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-2025, as shown below. Revenues of $59,564,653 and $61,240,769 for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25, respectively, match expenditure budgets of an equal amount.

Table 1. General Fund Operating Budget Summary
Revenues $ 51,833,428 $ 55,004,212 $ 59,564,653 $ 61,240,769 Expenditures $ 51,833,428 $ 50,750,336 $ 59,564,653 $ 61,240,769 TOTAL SURPLUS/ (DEFICIT) $ - $ 4,253,876 $ - $ -
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

GENERAL FUND PROPOSED
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
FY 2022-23
YEAR-END EST.

Revenues
The General Fund has several revenue sources, including five (5) major categories:

Sales Tax, Property Tax, Utility Users’ Tax, Licenses and Permits, and Business License Tax. Together, these five (5) categories amount to over 87% of total General Fund Revenues.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 4 of 16 ends

The following table provides an overview of the revenues per category, compared to prior year actuals, the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget and Year-End Estimate, and the FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 Proposed General Fund Budgets.

Table 2. General Fund Revenues
Revenue Source
FY 2021-22

ACTUALS
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
BUDGET
FY 2022-23

YEAREND

ESTIMATE
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
Sales Tax $ 24,551,320 $ 24,482,589 $ 25,418,764 $ 24,937,496 $ 25,567,451 Property Tax 12,458,946 13,044,410 13,120,462 13,906,142 14,184,266 Utility Users Tax 3,567,128 3,159,400 3,846,818 4,178,135 4,505,627 Franchise Tax 1,006,998 970,000 970,000 970,000 950,000 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) 533,482 565,020 565,020 560,000 571,200 Other Taxes* 1,075,300 1,109,627 1,161,400 1,179,900 1,217,296 Licenses & Permits 1,833,515 2,166,564 2,110,288 2,417,665 2,487,915 Business License Tax 1,393,135 1,459,062 2,115,015 6,493,628 6,792,027 Charges for Services 257,615 445,211 431,221 395,130 406,141 All Other Revenues** 2,584,066 2,606,245 3,439,924 2,954,460 2,766,606 OPERATING REVENUE 49,261,505 50,008,128 53,178,912 57,992,556 59,448,529 Transfers In*** 1,479,066 1,825,300 1,825,300 1,757,097 1,792,240 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUE $ 50,740,571 $ 51,833,428 $ 55,004,212 $ 59,749,653 $ 61,240,769 *Includes Property Transfer Tax and Rubbish Franchise Fee **Includes Fines & Forfeitures, Use of Money, Other Revenue, and Intergovernmental Revenue ***Includes Transfer In (Gas Tax)
Expenditures
Based on the City’s strategic priorities and guiding principles established, the FY 2023- 25 Biennial Budget was developed using thoughtful and fiscally responsible balancing measures to provide exceptional services to our community and ensure ongoing attention to city infrastructure.

The following discussion summarizes the City’s proposed spending plan for the General Fund for FY 2023-25.

The General Fund has a proposed operating budget of $59,564,653 for FY 2023-24 and $61,240,769 for FY 2024-25. This amount includes $53,388,154 in ongoing expenditures, $1,065,000 Operating Transfers-out, and $5,111,499 Non-Operating Transfers-out for FY 2023-24, and $55,623,122 in ongoing expenditures, $1,065,000 Operating Transfers-out, and $4,552,642 Non-Operating Transfers-out for FY 2024-25.

This amount funds the daily, ongoing operations of the City, including public safety (Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department contract), Community and Economic CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 5 of 16 ends

Development efforts, Parks and Recreation programs, Public Works maintenance, animal care/control, debt service, as well as various City services and functions that contribute to the vital operations of the City.

The Transfers-Out category includes operating transfers for the Sales Tax Pledge from the General Fund to the Successor Agency (SA) to fulfill the City’s obligation for the SA 2021 Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds (TARBs). The Non-Operating Transfers-Out includes funding for several critical capital projects encompassing Street Resurfacing, Sewer Main Improvement, Smith Park/Rio Vista Fence Replacement, and Rio Vista Musco Lighting. Table 3 shows the expenditure percentage of each department/function relative to the total General Fund budget, with a comparison between the FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget and the Proposed FY 2023-24 and FY 2024- 25 Budgets.

Table 3. General Fund Expenditures
Administration $ 2,219,417 $ 2,403,983 4.0% 2,411,033 $ 3.9% Public Safety 12,854,647 13,964,003 23.4% 15,169,096 24.8% Administrative Services 2,932,526 3,385,377 5.7% 3,459,240 5.6% Community and Economic Development 7,473,165 7,285,145 12.2% 7,250,185 11.8% Human Resources 1,093,293 1,233,512 2.1% 1,307,992 2.1% Non-Departmental 6,810,890 6,573,048 11.0% 7,009,639 11.4% Parks and Recreation 6,289,561 7,644,904 12.8% 7,752,251 12.7% Public Works 9,947,234 10,898,178 18.3% 11,263,686 18.4% Operating Transfers Out 1,065,000 1,065,000 1.8% 1,065,000 1.7% Non-Operating Transfers Out 1,147,695 5,111,503 8.6% 4,552,647 7.4% TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 51,833,428 $ 59,564,653 100% 61,240,769 $ 100% FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25
Department/ Program PROPOSED
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
%
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
%
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
Table 4 summarizes total General Fund Expenditures by category as follows.

Table 4. Summary General Fund Budget by Category
Salaries and Benefits $ 22,119,107 $ 23,026,023
Maintenance and Operations $ 31,269,043 $ 32,597,099
Transfers Out $ 6,176,503 $ 5,617,647
TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 59,564,653 $ 61,240,769 GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 6 of 16 ends

Since May 9, 2023, Public Hearing, certain adjustments to proposed expenditures have been identified and are therefore being recommended to better fund the community’s needs. The complete list of those adjustments is included in Enclosure 4.

The revised actions itemized in Enclosure 4 result in a net neutral ($0) impact on the General Fund and approximately $478,000 for the Golf Course Fund (Fund 570) on the proposed budget.

Table 5 below shows a revised summary of the Proposed Positions by Department.

The complete listing of Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department can be found in Enclosure 1, Exhibit C.

Table 5. Proposed Positions by Department
Department FY 2022-23
Adopted Additions Deletions FY 2023-25Proposed
Administration 12.00 0.00 0.00 12.00
Administrative Services 16.00 2.00 0.00 18.00
Community and Economic Development 31.00 1.00 -2.00 30.00 Human Resources 4.00 0.00 0.00 4.00
Parks and Recreation 27.00 1.00 0.00 28.00
Public Works 64.00 3.00 0.00 67.00
TOTAL 154.00 7.00 -2.00 159.00
Enterprise Funds
The City develops budgets for four (4) Enterprise Funds – Water Authority, Pico Rivera Innovative Energy (PRIME), Golf Course, and Sports Arena. Collectively, these funds operate separately and collect fees from customers to cover all or most of the costs of the services they provide. The following depicts the funds’ proposed budgets for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25.

The Water Authority Fund – The City Council approved the Water Authority to raise water rates by 10% annually starting from July 1, 2021, and continuing for five (5) years.

These increases are necessary to finance critical infrastructure projects such as the PFAS Water Treatment System, water main improvements, and an advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) system.

The projected revenues take into account the impact of the proposed rate increases and the expected constant water usage estimated by staff. As the City progresses with the CIP projects listed above and expects to incur CIP expenses of $8.2 million in FY 2023- 24 and $7.7 million in FY 2024-25, the Water Authority Fund expects net losses in these two (2) fiscal years, as shown in Table 6.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 7 of 16 ends

The PRIME Fund includes revenues and expenses for purchasing and selling “greener” energy for consumers (i.e., residents and business owners in Pico Rivera).

Due to unprecedented increases in energy prices over the past year, PRIME had to increase its generation rates in response to changes in the cost of power and related products in the market. This cost increase has impacted all load-serving entities, including Community Choice Aggregators (CCAs), such as PRIME, and investor-owned utilities (IOUs), such as Southern California Edison (SCE).

PRIME has set its rates to ensure competitive pricing for customers while covering expenses related to power procurement and program administration. PRIME’s rates are developed to mirror SCE’s generation rates with a 3% discount.

The proposed rates aim to generate sufficient revenues to cover PRIME's operations and maintain approved reserves according to PRIME’s adopted policies. As a result, PRIME expects to generate higher revenues in the next two (2) fiscal years than the expenses required to maintain sufficient reserves in the PRIME fund to weather the storm.

The Golf Course Fund – Following the Study Session on May 9, 2023, and the Public Hearing on June 13, 2023, the proposed budget for the Golf Course in FY 2023-25 underwent additional analysis. Upon evaluation, staff determines adjustments are necessary to accurately represent the rising expenses associated with supplies, materials, and personnel. As shown in Enclosure 4, the Golf Course expects net losses of approximately $785,000 for FY 2023-24 and $722,000 for FY 2024-25.

The Sports Arena Fund has returned to operational levels similar to those seen prior to the pandemic for events and rentals. Based on this, staff has estimated revenues and expenses for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 to be similar to pre-pandemic levels, resulting in net incomes of approximately $170,000 for each fiscal year. [This space intentionally left blank]
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 8 of 16 ends

Table 6 summarizes the Enterprise Fund Budgets.

Table 6. Summary Enterprise Fund Budgets
Water Authority PRIME Golf Course Sports Arena Total
Estimated Fund Balance 7/1/23: $ 27,634,299 $ 10,607,164 $ (3,618,389) $ 680,638 $ 35,303,712 Proposed FY 2023-24:

Revenues: 12,049,675 23,655,274 877,500 330,376 36,912,825 Expenses: (10,033,929) (18,741,010) (1,662,656) (158,486) (30,596,081) Operating Income (Loss) 2,015,746 4,914,264 (785,156) 171,890 6,316,744 Capital Outlay: (8,590,000) - - - (8,590,000)
Net Income (Loss): (6,574,254) 4,914,264 (785,156) 171,890 (2,273,256) Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/24: $ 21,060,045 $ 15,521,428 $ (4,403,545) $ 852,528 $ 33,030,456 Proposed FY 2024-25:

Revenues: 12,011,345 26,168,819 943,400 338,190 39,461,754 Expenses: (10,262,464) (21,681,990) (1,665,204) (161,696) (33,771,354) Operating Income (Loss) 1,748,881 4,486,829 (721,804) 176,494 5,690,400 Capital Outlay: (7,698,000) - (7,698,000)
Net Income (Loss): (5,949,119) 4,486,829 (721,804) 176,494 (2,007,600) Estimated Fund Balance 6/30/25: $ 15,110,926 $ 20,008,257 $ (5,125,349) $ 1,029,022 $ 31,022,856 All Other Funds
The budgets of all other funds are adequately funded with available fund balance and ongoing estimated revenues. Details and budgets for All Other Funds are attached to this report as Enclosure 1, Exhibit A5.

Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a long-range fiscal forecast identifying major public improvements to the City’s infrastructure over the next five (5) years. The CIP is important for planning, managing, and maintaining the City’s existing infrastructure. The City has a five (5) year CIP that encompasses bridge and roadways, parks and open spaces, stormwater quality, water production, treatment and delivery, sanitary sewer, City buildings, and other facilities, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements, and other large-scale capital projects.

This proposed five (5) year CIP plan has been developed utilizing input from various departments, community needs identified over the past year, and consideration of City Council priorities. It also incorporated recommendations outlined in the following master plans completed over the last several years; water, wastewater, storm drain, ADA, Pavement Management Program (PMP), urban water, reclaimed water, median landscaping, fiber optic, facilities, and security.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 9 of 16 ends

A study session was held on April 18, 2023, to provide the City Council and the community with a preview of the proposed capital projects for the five (5) fiscal years included in the period of July 1, 2023, through June 30, 2028 (FY 2023-28). The total CIP budget for the five (5) year period, FY 2023-28, is $279.5 million. Of this amount, $87.7 million represents funds carried over from FY 2022-23. The City is sustainable only if both its capital infrastructure assets and its financial assets can be maintained over the long term.

Table 7. Five (5) Year CIP Project Summary
Project Type Existing CIP Proposed CIP Total
Streets $ 23,080,681 $ 63,695,000 $ 86,775,681
Bridges $ 75,405,655 $ - $ 75,405,655
Water $ 40,533,965 $ - $ 40,533,965
Parks $ 46,247,753 $ 2,165,000 $ 48,412,753
Facilities $ 11,752,523 $ 1,144,400 $ 12,896,923
Traffic Signal $ 1,765,257 $ 7,500,260 $ 9,265,517
Storm Water $ 1,544,425 $ 2,630,000 $ 4,174,425
Wastewater $ 2,071,991 $ - $ 2,071,991
Total $ 202,402,250 $ 77,134,660 $ 279,536,910
The City's CIPs are funded utilizing a variety of restricted and special funding, as well as appropriations from the General Fund. Some of the special revenue funds used for CIP's are Proposition C, Measure R, Measure M, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund, Water Fund, and various Federal, State, and regional grants.
[This space intentionally left blank]
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 10 of 16 ends

Chart 1. Five (5) Year CIP Funding Sources
The following table details the various CIP funding sources.

Table 8. – Five (5) Year CIP Funding Sources
Source
Amount
Per the Study
on
April 18, 2023
CIP Projects to be
Funded per City
Manager's
Recommendation
Additional Unfunded
CIP Projects since
the Study
Adjusted
Amount % of Total
(Table 9) (Table 10)
General Fund $431,364 $9,664,150 $10,095,514 3.6%
ARPA $4,272,455 $4,272,455 1.5%
Water Fund $33,603,108 $33,603,108 12.0%
Certificates of Participation $3,201,103 $3,201,103 1.2% Local Return $18,168,842 $18,168,842 6.5%
CIP $15,917,916 $15,917,916 5.7%
Grants $119,982,462 $119,982,462 42.9%
SB1 $5,643,711 $5,643,711 2.0%
Measure W $4,752,461 $4,752,461 1.7%
Measure A $958,356 $958,356 0.3%
CDBG $1,067,138 $1,067,138 0.4%
Other Special Funds $718,133 $718,133 0.3%
Subtotal for Funded $208,717,049 $9,664,150 $ - $218,381,199 78.1% City Manager's Recommended List of CIP
Projects to be Funded
FY 2023-24 $ (5,111,503) $ (5,111,503)
FY 2024-25 $ (4,552,647) $ (4,552,647)
Projects Proposed by the City Council $ 2,100,000 $ 2,100,000 Traffic Safety Improvement Projects - LRSP $ 2,175,870 $ 2,175,870 Subtotal for Unfunded $ 66,543,991 $ (9,664,150) $ 4,275,870 $ 61,155,711 21.9% Total $275,261,040 $ - $ 4,275,870 $279,536,910 100.0%
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 11 of 16 ends

Unfunded Capital Project Needs
At the Study Session on April 18, 2023, the City identified $66.5 million in unfunded projects, including Streets, Parks, Facilities, and Wastewater CIPs.

Recommended List of CIP Projects to be Funded
To address the needs of the unfunded CIP projects, the City Manager recommends allocating the estimated General Fund surpluses of $5.1 million and $4.6 million for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25 to some CIP projects aligned with Measure AB, as a significant proportion of these estimated surpluses are derived from increased Business License (BL) revenues resulting from the approval of Measure AB by the City voters in November 2022.

The City commits to utilizing the additional BL revenues to enhance public safety, infrastructure, and park maintenance – as outlined in Measure AB – the City Manager recommends that the City Council approve the allocation and transfer of the estimated surpluses from the GF to the CIP Fund. This allocation would be used to fund the following CIP projects, which align with the goals and objectives of Measure AB.

Pavement Rehabilitation and Resurfacing Program
The City has unfunded street resurfacing needs of about $50.3 million over the next five (5) years, as depicted in Table 9. The unfunded amount for FY 2023-24 is $10.2 million. As street pavement has been a high priority of the residents and the City Council, staff recommends allocating a GF surplus of $4 million for this CIP in FY 2023- 24 and $4 million in FY 2024-25.

Wastewater Improvements
To avoid deferring the sewer main project, which will lead to substantially higher costs in the future, staff recommends allocating approximately $861,500 GF surplus for this CIP in FY 2023-24 and $552,647 in FY 2024-25.

Smith Park/Rio Vista Fence Replacement
The fences in Field #3 of Smith Park and Fields #2 and #3 at Rio Vista Park show signs of bending outward and protruding. This poses a danger to individuals who climb or crawl under the fences. Staff recommends allocating the GF surplus of $150,000 to promptly address the fence repairs as a preventive measure against potential risks.

Rio Vista Musco Lighting
Currently, no light poles are installed on Field #2 in Rio Vista Park, which restricts the usability of the field, particularly during daylight saving time. This creates a hazardous environment for user groups who continue to play with limited visibility. Staff recommends allocating a $100,000 GF surplus to install lights for Field #2 to improve visibility and safety for the groups utilizing the field.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 12 of 16 ends

Table 9 below shows the recommended list of CIP projects to be funded with the estimated General Fund surpluses for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25.

Table 9. Recommended List of CIP Projects to be Funded
FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25
Proposed Budget Proposed Budget
CIP Aligned with Measure AB Objectives and Goals
Street Resurfacing $ 4,000,000 $ 4,000,000
Sewer Main Improvement 861,503 552,647
Smith Park / Rio Vista Fence Replacement 150,000 -
Rio Vista Musco Lighting 100,000 -
Total Recommended CIP Projects to be Funded $ 5,111,503 $ 4,552,647 Recommended List of CIP Projects to be Funded
Should the City Council approve the transfers, the unfunded CIP sum will be reduced by $9.7 million. This strategic allocation would consequently reduce our current funding gaps and allow for the expedient execution of these vital improvement projects.

Following the CIP Study Session held on April 18, 2023, the City Council requested staff to look into the cost and scope of additional projects. Staff has been gathering relevant information, including estimated costs, for these projects. The details of the projects and their corresponding estimated costs are provided below:
i. Pico Park Playground Resurfacing
The playground surface at Pico Park has visibly aged. The estimated cost is $250,000 to replace the existing sand surface with either new rubberized material or synthetic turf to improve the overall appearance of the playground and create a more pleasant environment for park visitors and bring the sand surface into compliance.
ii. Rivera Park Sandbox Playground Resurfacing
To enhance visitors' enjoyment at Rivera Park playgrounds, the estimated cost is $100,000 to replace the existing sand surfaces with either a rubberized material or synthetic turf to bring the surface to compliance and provide park visitors with an elevated and enjoyable experience.
iii. Rivera Park Batting Cage
The pitching machines and fencing surrounding the batting cages at Rivera Park are significantly aged, with warping and breakage issues. The estimated cost is $600,000 to remove the pitching machines and remove and replace all concrete, fencing, and netting to allow for “coach pitch” cages at the Rivera Park batting cages.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 13 of 16 ends

iv. Park Exercising Equipment
Outdoor fitness stations are only available at Pico Park. The estimated cost is $900,000 to install park exercise equipment and outdoor fitness stations in Rivera, Smith, and Rio Vista Park to promote health and wellness throughout the City and to provide healthy spaces.
v. Monument Markers
The City is currently undertaking efforts to enhance the aesthetics of our median corridors, focusing on beautification. The estimated cost for implementing monument markers at strategic locations throughout the City is approximately $250,000. The City is also applying for a Clean California Grant, which could potentially cover this request if approved and deemed necessary by the City Council. The installation locations for the monument markers have not yet been finalized. If the grant cannot cover the associated expenses, the staff will seek guidance from the City Council on how to proceed. The monument markers would preserve the City's identity and history while serving as meaningful symbols for residents and visitors.

During the City Council meeting held on June 13, 2013, the Public Works Department presented the Local Roadway Safety Plan. The comprehensive plan proposed six (6) key projects to improve safety at identified locations. Recommended improvements included, but were not limited to, signal hardware improvements, signal timing updates, striping modifications, signage upgrades, installation of speed warning signs, and enhancement to unsignalized intersection crossings within the City.

In September 2022, staff utilized the recommendations in the LRSP to apply for the Call for Projects (HSIP Cycle 11) grants. The City was awarded three (3) grant applications totaling $4.7 million for traffic safety improvements, and the grant-awarded projects have been included in the current five-year CIP budget. Nevertheless, three (3) projects, amounting to $2.2 million, still need to be funded and are added to the unfunded CIP list. Staff will continue to utilize the recommended safety measures in the LRSP to apply for future federal and state grants to implement essential traffic safety improvements throughout the City.

Also at the June 13, 2023, Council meeting, the Public Works Department presented the Request for Proposals (RFP) results received on June 13, 2023, for the Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project (CIP. 21280) and requested additional funding of $3.6 million.

The City received various grants of $8.4 million and allocated $1.3 million in local return funds for this project. However, based on the RFP results, the total estimated project expenditures would be $13.3 million.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 14 of 16 ends

To meet the urgent needs, the Council directed staff to prioritize the $3.6 million gap and reconsidered the previously proposed projects. As a result, the proposed park projects of $2.1 million and LRSP projects of $2.2 million are added to the list of unfunded needs as staff continues to seek funding opportunities.

Table 10 below outlines the additional unfunded CIP projects added to the five-year CIP since the Study on April 18, 2023.

Table 10. Additional Unfunded CIP Projects
Additional Unfunded CIP Projects
Project Description Estimated Cost
City Council Requested Projects:

Pico Park Playground Resurfacing $ 250,000
Rivera Park Playground Resurfacing 100,000
Rivera Park Batting Cage 600,000
Park Exercising Equipment 900,000
Monument Markers 250,000
Subtotal 2,100,000
Traffic Safety Improvement Projects
Install radar feedback speed warning signs, delineators, reflectors and or object markers along roadway segments 533,120 Install stripping through intersection and raised median island at approaches 183,400
Signal timing improvements (coordination, phases, red, yellow or operation) and installation of emergency pre-emption device 1,459,350 Subtotal 2,175,870
Total Additional Unfunded CIP Projects $ 4,275,870
As a result, the unfunded CIP projects increase by $4.3 million. It includes the additional projects of $2.1 million proposed by the City Council during the CIP Study Session held on April 18, 2023, and additional traffic safety improvement projects of $2.2 million resulting from the Local Roadway Safety Plan presented to the City Council On June 13, 2023.

Table 11 encompasses all the aforementioned revisions pertaining to unfunded CIP projects and presents the updated information as follows:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 15 of 16 ends

Table 11. Unfunded CIP by Category and Fiscal Year
Category FY 23-24 FY 24-25 FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 Total ADA Improvements $ 1,350,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ 4,550,000 Facilities Projects $ 1,750,000 $ 120,000 $ 1,870,000
Parks Projects (a) (c ) $ 8,240,000 $ 900,000 $ 500,000 $ 9,640,000 Street Resurfacing (c ) $ 6,162,000 $ 6,300,000 $10,100,000 $ 9,900,000 $ 9,800,000 $42,262,000 Sewer Main Improvements (c ) $ 210,841 $ 447,000 $ 657,841 Traffic Projects (b) $ 188,170 $ 1,987,700 $ 2,175,870
Total $17,712,841 $ 8,120,000 $11,535,170 $13,187,700 $10,600,000 $61,155,711 (a) Include projects proposed by the City Council during the CIP Study Session on April 18, 2023 (b) Include projects resulted from the Local Roadway Safety Plan presented to the City Council on June 13, 2023 (c ) Net of allocations recommended by the City Manager for projects aligned with Measure AB objectives and goals Staff will continue seeking funding options to address the unfunded CIPs and incorporate them into current and future budgets to ensure that the City meets its critical needs and plans effectively for the future.

The Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Budgets are attached to this report as Enclosure 1, Exhibit D1, D2, and D3.

Conclusion:

The City proposed balance General Fund budgets for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25, as shown in Enclosure 1, Exhibit A. The City expects revenues of $59,564,653 and $61,240,769 for FY 2023-24 and FY 2024-25, respectively, to match expenditure budgets of equal amounts. The Proposed Budget with all funds combined includes $151,307,953 in total revenues and $154,663,323 in total expenditures for FY 2023-24 and $146,736,764 in total revenues and $154,669,681 in total expenditures for FY 2024-25.

As part of the Final Budget Adoption, staff has prepared a reconciliation of changes from the Preliminary to the Final Adopted Budget (Enclosure 4). The FY 2023-25 Budget was constructed to ensure financial sustainability to strategically position the City to execute its 21st Century Vision of a sustainable, equitable, and vibrant community to live and work.

Remaining on the path to structural balance through fiscal discipline is essential in light of the projected capital needs. Staff will continue to monitor each revenue source and expenditure activity closely and will evaluate opportunities to enhance revenues and reduce expenditures.

Steve Carmona
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF JUNE 27, 2023
ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 OPERATING BUDGET AND FIVE-YEAR

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, APPROVAL OF THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, AND APPROVAL OF UPDATED

RESERVE POLICIES

Page 16 of 16 ends

SC:AG:JG:DS:ep
Enclosures: 1) Resolution approving and adopting the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Budget and Capital Improvement Projects (Exhibit A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, and D1, D2, and D3)
2) Adopted Resolution No. 7284 for the GANN appropriations limits for Fiscal Year 2023-24 (Exhibit A)
3) Resolution adopting updated General Fund and Proprietary Fund reserve policies (Exhibits A and B)
4) Summary of Proposed Changes
RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and considered the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24, presented through staff reports, Study Sessions, and public testimony; and information received in a noticed regular meeting on the City budget; and WHEREAS, the original of said Proposed Budget will be revised so as to reflect each and all of the amendments, changes, and modifications which the City Council, up to the time of adoption of this resolution including any actions taken at the June 27, 2023 meeting, believes should be made in said Proposed Budget as so submitted and to correct any non-substantive errors discovered.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. That the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24, a complete copy of which has been provided to the City Council and made available to the public and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, and which is summarized in Exhibits A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5, attached hereto, is hereby approved and adopted.

SECTION 2. That the Estimated Revenue and Transfers In for all funds for Fiscal Year 2023-24, a summary of which is attached as “Exhibit A1,” and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted. When combined with reserves, the Estimated Revenue and Transfers In for Fiscal Year 2023-24 are sufficient to fund the appropriations set forth in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24.

SECTION 3. That the Proposed Appropriations and Transfers Out for all funds for Fiscal Year 2023-24, a summary of which is attached as “Exhibit A1,” and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, providing appropriations summaries of details currently contained in the City’s accounting system, including technical adjustments related to Transfers In and Transfers Out, and detail of estimated revenue, is approved and adopted.

SECTION 4. That the several Tables of Organization and Master Position Control, copies of which are attached hereto as “Exhibit B” and “Exhibit C,” respectively and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein, are hereby approved and adopted. The City Manager, subject to compliance with all applicable Municipal Code and Personnel Rules and Regulations, may revise the Tables of Organization and Master Position Control provided that the authorized total number of full-time, regular personnel citywide does not exceed the total number of authorized positions on the Master Position Control (“Exhibit C”).

Enclosure 1
4a
RESOLUTION NO. ____

Page 2 of 3 ends

SECTION 5. That the Salary Schedules/Tables for all authorized full-time positions are updated and approved so as to reflect the salary provisions in effect per all approved Memorandum of Understanding between the City and all recognized bargaining groups.

SECTION 6. That from the effective date of the budget, the several amounts stated therein as proposed expenditures shall be and become appropriated to the several departments for the respective objects and purposes therein named; provided, however, that:

SECTON 6.1. Department Directors are hereby authorized to move appropriations from one object to another, within each budgetary program/division and within the same fund, provided that total approved appropriations for a budget program and within the same fund are not exceeded; and,
SECTION 6.2. The City Manager is hereby authorized to transfer operating budget appropriations within the same fund between departments, divisions, programs, and/or object codes, provided total appropriations for a Department by fund are not increased.

SECTION 7. That changes to total Department appropriations, total fund appropriations, all other changes to Capital Improvement Program appropriations not specified in Section 6 et al of this Resolution, changes to the number of full-time, regular positions by classification, transfers to and/or from appropriated reserves, cancellation of appropriations, and appropriations of fund balances shall require the majority approval of the City Council.

SECTION 8. That the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contained in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24 (“Exhibit D”) is hereby approved in concept, and the Director of Public Works or his/her designee is authorized to publicly advertise for bids on these projects in accordance with State of California statutes and City of Pico Rivera Municipal Code.

SECTION 9. The construction of Capital Improvement Projects requires the use of professional services such as engineering oversight, geotechnical, water testing, project management, design, survey, and other required studies and activities. Funding for these professional services is included within each Capital Improvement Project’s budget as set forth in the Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-24, and specifically the five-year Proposed Capital Improvement Program budget as presented in “Exhibit D.” Consistent with the State of California statutes and City of Pico Rivera Municipal Code sections covering procurement of professional services, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to enter into any necessary professional services agreements to facilitate the completion of an approved Capital Improvement Project.

SECTION 10. That all encumbrances remaining as of June 30, 2023, after thorough review by appropriate Finance Department staff, will either be released or re-appropriated for use in Fiscal Year 2023-24, as appropriate, in the respective funds, departments, programs, and accounts/objects, thus adjusting the adopted budget by the encumbered amount carried over without further City Council action required.

SECTION 11. That all active Capital Improvement Program appropriation balances that existed as of June 30, 2023, will be re-appropriated for use in Fiscal Year 2023-24, as RESOLUTION NO. ____

Page 3 of 3 ends

appropriate without further City Council action required.

SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall become effective immediately upon this approval.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 27th day of June, 2023.

_______________________________
Erik Lutz, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _______________________________ Cynthia Ayala, Jr. Deputy City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Expenditures Revenue Surplus / (Deficit)
General Fund * $ 59,906,153 $ 59,947,753 $ 41,600
Internal Service Fund $ 331,000 $ 349,281 $ 18,281
Special Revenue Funds $ 19,412,502 $ 17,844,671 $ (1,567,831) Grant Funds** $ 33,787,188 $ 33,200,835 $ (586,353)
Capital Project Funds $ 770,390 $ - $ (770,390)
Enterprise Funds $ 39,186,081 $ 36,912,825 $ (2,273,256) Assessment District Funds $ 1,035,722 $ 1,865,668 $ 829,946 Trust and Agency Funds $ 234,287 $ 1,186,920 $ 952,633
TOTAL CITY BUDGET $ 154,663,323 $ 151,307,953 $ (3,355,370) * Includes funds supported by the General Fund.
**Grant Reimbursement Funds
City of Pico Rivera
Citywide (All Funds) Summary
FY 2023-24 Proposed Budget (Expenditures and Revenue)
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A1
Expenditures Revenue Surplus / (Deficit)
General Fund * $ 61,582,269 $ 61,617,789 $ 35,520
Internal Service Fund $ 331,000 $ 347,101 $ 16,101
Special Revenue Funds $ 22,025,444 $ 21,923,607 $ (101,837) Grant Funds ** $ 20,985,740 $ 20,299,585 $ (686,155)
Capital Project Funds $ 7,019,632 $ - $ (7,019,632)
Enterprise Funds $ 41,469,354 $ 39,461,754 $ (2,007,600) Assessment District Funds $ 1,071,857 $ 1,917,827 $ 845,970 Trust and Agency Funds $ 184,385 $ 1,169,100 $ 984,715
TOTAL CITY BUDGET $ 154,669,681 $ 146,736,764 $ (7,932,917) * Includes funds supported by the General Fund.
**Grant Reimbursement Funds
City of Pico Rivera
Citywide (All Funds) Summary
FY 2024-25 Proposed Budget (Expenditures and Revenue)
Starting Fund Estimated Estimated Estimated Operating Transfers In TOTAL Operating Capital Transfers TOTAL Estimated Balance
Revenue &
Transfers-In
Expenditures &
Transfers-Out Fund Balance Revenues REVENUES Expenditures Projects Out EXPENDITURES Fund Balance July 1, 2022 FY 22-23 FY 22-23 July 1, 2023 June 30, 2024 General Fund
100 General Fund - Operating 54,281,327 55,004,212 50,750,336 58,535,204 57,807,556 1,757,097 59,564,653 53,388,150 - 6,176,503 59,564,653 58,535,204 105 Liability Claims (126,329) 282,829 122,339 34,161 170,000 - 170,000 170,000 - - 170,000 34,161 106 Workers Compensation Claims (347,676) 519,176 115,882 55,618 171,500 - 171,500 171,500 - - 171,500 55,618 551 Water Enterprise 18,234,148 7,689 - 18,241,837 41,600 - 41,600 - - - - 18,283,437 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust 1,180,688 52,266 3,448 1,229,506 - - - - - - - 1,229,506 Sub Total 73,222,158 55,866,172 50,992,005 78,096,325 58,190,656 1,757,097 59,947,753 53,729,650 - 6,176,503 59,906,153 78,137,925 Equipment Replacement Fund
170 Equipment Replacement 1,045,212 223,922 273,760 995,374 349,281 - 349,281 331,000 - - 331,000 1,013,655 Sub Total 1,045,212 223,922 273,760 995,374 349,281 - 349,281 331,000 - - 331,000 1,013,655 Special Revenue Funds
200 Air Quality Improvement 454,527 43,023 33,452 464,097 90,030 - 90,030 34,600 - - 34,600 519,527 201 State Gas Tax - 1,083,838 957,004 126,834 1,757,098 - 1,757,098 - - 1,757,098 1,757,098 126,834 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief 4,543,892 817,156 911,332 4,449,716 1,536,363 - 1,536,363 1,513,154 - - 1,513,154 4,472,925 205 Proposition A 3,319,585 1,570,323 748,231 4,141,677 1,847,270 - 1,847,270 2,220,188 - - 2,220,188 3,768,759 206 Proposition C 3,154,910 1,326,032 599,369 3,881,572 1,543,750 - 1,543,750 1,398,000 - - 1,398,000 4,027,322 207 Measure R 1,682,726 1,160,987 345,717 2,497,995 1,148,087 - 1,148,087 1,315,015 - - 1,315,015 2,331,067 208 Measure M 387,615 1,107,219 67,939 1,426,895 1,270,180 - 1,270,180 877,767 - 831,669 1,709,436 987,639 209 Measure W 1,161,998 901,754 136,193 1,927,559 954,810 - 954,810 1,080,000 - - 1,080,000 1,802,369 210 Transportation Development Act (5,492) - 17,984 (23,476) 71,888 - 71,888 50,000 - - 50,000 (1,588) 215 Measure A - - - - 150,000 - 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 - 220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) 567,732 141,844 - 709,575 162,500 - 162,500 - - - - 872,075 221 California Beverage Container 46,060 150 5,702 40,508 15,780 - 15,780 15,500 - - 15,500 40,788 225 Sewer Maintenance (20,547) 77 16,687 (37,158) - - - - - - - (37,158) 250 Cable/PEG Support 300,872 36,855 7,673 330,054 - - - 37,355 - - 37,355 292,699 255 Economic Development Sustainability 963,014 3,444 - 966,458 18,630 - 18,630 - - - - 985,088 263 Passons Grade Separation 15,158 - - 15,158 - - - - - - - 15,158 270 Park Development 229,025 (1,885) 227,000 140 4,430 - 4,430 - - - - 4,570 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (1,763) 695,000 695,846 (2,609) 641,377 - 641,377 641,377 - - 641,377 (2,609) 282 Home Program 2,579,298 34,115 - 2,613,414 9,000 - 9,000 - - - - 2,622,414 283 CalHome 703,303 700 - 704,003 - - - - - - - 704,003 290 L&M Income Housing Asset 2,668,604 9,796 - 2,678,401 20,040 - 20,040 - - - - 2,698,441 291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) 475,050 6,183,687 6,129,251 529,486 5,771,769 - 5,771,769 6,121,110 - - 6,121,110 180,145 305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation 12,376,792 148,864 6,262,006 6,263,649 - 831,669 831,669 1,369,669 - - 1,369,669 5,725,649 640 American Recovery Plan (0) - - (0) - - - - - - - (0) Sub Total 35,602,358 15,262,978 17,161,387 33,703,949 17,013,002 831,669 17,844,671 16,823,735 - 2,588,767 19,412,502 32,136,118 City of Pico Rivera
Revenue and Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Summary of Resources and Requirements
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Proposed Budget
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A2
Starting Fund Estimated Estimated Estimated Operating Transfers In TOTAL Operating Capital Transfers TOTAL Estimated Balance
Revenue &
Transfers-In
Expenditures &
Transfers-Out Fund Balance Revenues REVENUES Expenditures Projects Out EXPENDITURES Fund Balance July 1, 2022 FY 22-23 FY 22-23 July 1, 2023 June 30, 2024 Revenue and Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Summary of Resources and Requirements
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Proposed Budget
Grant Funds
637 Gateway Cities Council of Governments (COG) 17,334 - - 17,334 - - - - - - - 17,334 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Federal (343) - - (343) - - - - - - - (343) 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) (1,836) 270,861 267,887 1,138 3,869,647 - 3,869,647 3,869,647 - - 3,869,647 1,138 670 Used Oil Recycle 73,129 262 - 73,391 10,420 - 10,420 26,562 - - 26,562 57,249 671 Cal Recycle 7,309 315,530 109,396 213,443 215,655 - 215,655 226,777 - - 226,777 202,321 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Hopes (REACH) 492,505 363,346 870,681 (14,830) 1,265,914 - 1,265,914 1,324,821 - - 1,324,821 (73,737) 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants (124,579) - 232,073 (356,652) 10,093,531 - 10,093,531 10,195,591 - - 10,195,591 (458,712) 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants (225,253) 431,927 771,934 (565,260) 8,379,390 - 8,379,390 8,379,390 - - 8,379,390 (565,260) 699 Miscellaneous State Grants (282,053) 5,651 140,363 (416,765) 9,366,278 - 9,366,278 9,764,400 - - 9,764,400 (814,887) Sub Total (43,786) 1,387,576 2,392,334 (1,048,544) 33,200,835 - 33,200,835 33,787,188 - - 33,787,188 (1,634,897) Capital Projects Fund
400 Capital Improvement 11,678,523 1,147,695 90,268 12,735,950 - - - 770,390 - - 770,390 11,965,560 450 Financial System Replacement (87,913) 87,913 - - - - - - - - - - Sub Total 11,590,609 1,235,608 90,268 12,735,950 - - - 770,390 - - 770,390 11,965,560 Assessment District Funds
230 Lighting Assessment District 1,309,912 1,766,102 333,862 2,742,152 1,864,468 - 1,864,468 1,035,722 - - 1,035,722 3,570,899 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District 57,636 6,217 - 63,853 1,200 - 1,200 - - - - 65,053 Sub Total 1,367,548 1,772,320 333,862 2,806,006 1,865,668 - 1,865,668 1,035,722 - - 1,035,722 3,635,952 Enterprise Funds
550 Water Authority 33,378,487 9,735,886 15,480,074 27,634,299 12,049,675 - 12,049,675 18,623,929 - - 18,623,929 21,060,045 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) 4,930,136 24,352,389 18,675,360 10,607,164 23,655,274 - 23,655,274 18,741,010 - - 18,741,010 15,521,428 570 Golf Course (2,939,360) 600,640 1,279,670 (3,618,389) 877,500 - 877,500 1,662,656 - - 1,662,656 (4,403,545) 590 Recreation Area Complex 368,009 308,595 (4,035) 680,638 330,376 - 330,376 158,486 - - 158,486 852,528 Sub Total 35,737,271 34,997,509 35,431,069 35,303,712 36,912,825 - 36,912,825 39,186,081 - - 39,186,081 33,030,456 Successor Agency
851 Successor - DS FUND (107,053,667) 1,164,737 338,827 (106,227,757) - 1,065,000 1,065,000 234,287 - - 234,287 (105,397,044) 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund 4,339,247 1,124,230 - 5,463,478 121,920 - 121,920 - - - - 5,585,398 854 Successor Sales Tax 1,065,000 - - 1,065,000 - - - - - - - 1,065,000 Sub Total (101,649,420) 2,288,967 338,827 (99,699,279) 121,920 1,065,000 1,186,920 234,287 - - 234,287 (98,746,646) -
GRAND TOTAL 56,871,951 113,035,053 107,013,511 62,893,493 $ 147,654,187 $ 3,653,766 $ 151,307,953 $ 145,898,053 $ - $ 8,765,270 $ 154,663,323 $ 59,538,124 Beginning Fund Estimated Estimated Estimated Operating Transfers In TOTAL Operating Capital Transfers TOTAL Estimated Balance
Revenue &
Transfers-In
Expenditures &
Transfers-Out Fund Balance Revenues REVENUES Expenditures Projects Out EXPENDITURES Fund Balance July 1, 2023 FY 23-24 FY 23-24 July 1, 2024 June 30, 2025 General Fund
100 General Fund - Operating 58,535,204 59,564,653 59,564,653 58,535,204 59,448,529 1,792,240 61,240,769 55,623,122 - 5,617,647 61,240,769 58,535,204 105 Liability Claims 34,161 170,000 170,000 34,161 170,000 - 170,000 170,000 - - 170,000 34,161 106 Workers Compensation Claims 55,618 171,500 171,500 55,618 171,500 - 171,500 171,500 - - 171,500 55,618 551 Water Enterprise 18,241,837 41,600 - 18,283,437 35,520 - 35,520 - - - - 18,318,957 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust 1,229,506 - - 1,229,506 - - - - - - - 1,229,506 Sub Total 78,096,325 59,947,753 59,906,153 78,137,925 59,825,549 1,792,240 61,617,789 55,964,622 - 5,617,647 61,582,269 78,173,445 Equipment Replacement Fund
170 Equipment Replacement 995,374 349,281 331,000 1,013,655 347,101 - 347,101 331,000 - - 331,000 1,029,756 Sub Total 995,374 349,281 331,000 1,013,655 347,101 - 347,101 331,000 - - 331,000 1,029,756 Special Revenue Funds
200 Air Quality Improvement 464,097 90,030 34,600 519,527 88,710 - 88,710 34,600 - - 34,600 573,637 201 State Gas Tax 126,834 1,757,098 1,757,098 126,834 1,792,240 - 1,792,240 - - 1,792,240 1,792,240 126,834 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief 4,449,716 1,536,363 1,513,154 4,472,925 1,567,090 - 1,567,090 1,317,930 - - 1,317,930 4,722,085 205 Proposition A 4,141,677 1,847,270 2,220,188 3,768,759 1,916,719 - 1,916,719 2,259,056 - - 2,259,056 3,426,422 206 Proposition C 3,881,572 1,543,750 1,398,000 4,027,322 1,599,672 - 1,599,672 1,465,000 - - 1,465,000 4,161,994 207 Measure R 2,497,995 1,148,087 1,315,015 2,331,067 1,191,449 - 1,191,449 1,325,015 - - 1,325,015 2,197,501 208 Measure M 1,426,895 1,270,180 1,709,436 987,639 4,523,860 - 4,523,860 3,551,500 - 831,669 4,383,169 1,128,330 209 Measure W 1,927,559 954,810 1,080,000 1,802,369 954,810 - 954,810 930,000 - - 930,000 1,827,179 210 Transportation Development Act (23,476) 71,888 50,000 (1,588) 75,123 - 75,123 90,000 - - 90,000 (16,465) 215 Measure A - 150,000 150,000 - 808,356 - 808,356 808,356 - - 808,356 - 220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) 709,575 162,500 - 872,075 150,670 - 150,670 - - - - 1,022,745 221 California Beverage Container 40,508 15,780 15,500 40,788 670 - 670 - - - - 41,458 225 Sewer Maintenance (37,158) - - (37,158) - - - - - - - (37,158) 250 Cable/PEG Support 330,054 - 37,355 292,699 - - - 37,355 - - 37,355 255,344 255 Economic Development Sustainability 966,458 18,630 - 985,088 15,910 - 15,910 - - - - 1,000,998 263 Passons Grade Separation 15,158 - - 15,158 - - - - - - - 15,158 270 Park Development 140 4,430 - 4,570 3,780 - 3,780 - - - - 8,350 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (2,609) 641,377 641,377 (2,609) 600,000 - 600,000 600,000 - - 600,000 (2,609) 282 Home Program 2,613,414 9,000 - 2,622,414 9,000 - 9,000 - - - - 2,631,414 283 CalHome 704,003 - - 704,003 - - - - - - - 704,003
290 L&M Income Housing Asset 2,678,401 20,040 - 2,698,441 17,110 - 17,110 - - - - 2,715,551 291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) 529,486 5,771,769 6,121,110 180,145 5,771,769 - 5,771,769 6,146,054 - - 6,146,054 (194,140) 305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation 6,263,649 831,669 1,369,669 5,725,649 - 836,669 836,669 836,669 - - 836,669 5,725,649 640 American Recovery Plan (0) - - (0) - - - - - - - (0) Sub Total 33,703,949 17,844,671 19,412,502 32,136,118 21,086,938 836,669 21,923,607 19,401,535 - 2,623,909 22,025,444 32,034,281 City of Pico Rivera
Revenue and Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Summary of Resources and Requirements
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Proposed Budget
Beginning Fund Estimated Estimated Estimated Operating Transfers In TOTAL Operating Capital Transfers TOTAL Estimated Balance
Revenue &
Transfers-In
Expenditures &
Transfers-Out Fund Balance Revenues REVENUES Expenditures Projects Out EXPENDITURES Fund Balance July 1, 2023 FY 23-24 FY 23-24 July 1, 2024 June 30, 2025 Revenue and Expenditure Summary (All Funds)
Summary of Resources and Requirements
Fiscal Year 2024-25 Proposed Budget
Grant Funds
637 Gateway Cities Council of Governments (COG) 17,334 - - 17,334 - - - - - - - 17,334 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Fed (343) - - (343) - - - - - - - (343) 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) 1,138 3,869,647 3,869,647 1,138 14,173,154 - 14,173,154 14,173,154 - - 14,173,154 1,138 670 Used Oil Recycle 73,391 10,420 26,562 57,249 10,410 - 10,410 26,562 - - 26,562 41,097 671 Cal Recycle 213,443 215,655 226,777 202,321 258,786 - 258,786 233,815 - - 233,815 227,292 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Ho (14,830) 1,265,914 1,324,821 (73,737) 1,263,704 - 1,263,704 1,360,262 - - 1,360,262 (170,296) 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants (356,652) 10,093,531 10,195,591 (458,712) 93,531 - 93,531 196,789 - - 196,789 (561,970) 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants (565,260) 8,379,390 8,379,390 (565,260) - - - - - - - (565,260) 699 Miscellaneous State Grants (416,765) 9,366,278 9,764,400 (814,887) 4,500,000 - 4,500,000 4,995,158 - - 4,995,158 (1,310,045) Sub Total (1,048,544) 33,200,835 33,787,188 (1,634,897) 20,299,585 - 20,299,585 20,985,740 - - 20,985,740 (2,321,052) Capital Projects Fund
400 Capital Improvement 12,735,950 - 770,390 11,965,560 - - - 7,019,632 - - 7,019,632 4,945,928 450 Financial System Replacement - - - - - - - - - - - - Sub Total 12,735,950 - 770,390 11,965,560 - - - 7,019,632 - - 7,019,632 4,945,928 Assessment District Funds
230 Lighting Assessment District 2,742,152 1,864,468 1,035,722 3,570,899 1,916,797 - 1,916,797 1,071,857 - - 1,071,857 4,415,839 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District 63,853 1,200 - 65,053 1,030 - 1,030 - - - - 66,083 Sub Total 2,806,006 1,865,668 1,035,722 3,635,952 1,917,827 - 1,917,827 1,071,857 - - 1,071,857 4,481,923 Enterprise Funds
550 Water Authority 27,634,299 12,049,675 18,623,929 21,060,045 12,011,345 - 12,011,345 17,960,464 - - 17,960,464 15,110,926 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) 10,607,164 23,655,274 18,741,010 15,521,428 26,168,819 - 26,168,819 21,681,990 - - 21,681,990 20,008,257 570 Golf Course (3,618,389) 877,500 1,662,656 (4,403,545) 943,400 - 943,400 1,665,204 - - 1,665,204 (5,125,349) 590 Recreation Area Complex 680,638 330,376 158,486 852,528 338,190 - 338,190 161,696 - - 161,696 1,029,022 Sub Total 35,303,712 36,912,825 39,186,081 33,030,456 39,461,754 - 39,461,754 41,469,354 - - 41,469,354 31,022,856 Successor Agency
851 Successor - DS FUND (106,227,757) 1,065,000 234,287 (105,397,044) - 1,065,000 1,065,000 184,385 - - 184,385 (104,516,429) 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund 5,463,478 121,920 - 5,585,398 104,100 - 104,100 - - - - 5,689,498 854 Successor Sales Tax 1,065,000 - - 1,065,000 - - - - - - - 1,065,000 Sub Total (99,699,279) 1,186,920 234,287 (98,746,646) 104,100 1,065,000 1,169,100 184,385 - - 184,385 (97,761,931) -
GRAND TOTAL 62,893,493 151,307,953 154,663,323 59,538,124 $ 143,042,855 $ 3,693,909 $ 146,736,764 $ 146,428,125 $ - $ 8,241,556 $ 154,669,681 $ 51,605,206

OBJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2019-20

ACTUALS
FY 2020-21

ACTUALS
FY 2021-22

ACTUALS
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
FY 2022-23

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
Taxes and Franchises
40100 - SALES AND USE TAXES 9,659,565 10,005,601 12,373,369 11,605,589 12,518,764 12,477,496 12,792,451 40101 - SALES AND USE TAXES - MEASURE P 9,704,707 11,319,835 12,177,951 12,877,000 12,900,000 12,460,000 12,775,000 40200 - FRANCHISE TAX 880,568 941,607 1,006,998 970,000 970,000 970,000 950,000 40400 - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 185,014 194,868 299,231 123,627 175,000 120,000 115,000 40500 - TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 438,232 433,797 533,482 565,020 565,020 560,000 571,200 40700 - UTILITY USERS TAX 3,064,500 3,157,258 3,567,128 3,159,400 3,846,818 4,178,135 4,505,627 40800 - RUBBISH FRANCHISE FEE 907,000 934,800 950,000 986,000 986,400 1,059,900 1,102,296 44200 - PROPERTY TAX-IN LIEU OF VLF 7,965,003 8,348,709 8,878,490 9,381,410 9,457,462 10,022,071 10,222,513 45400 - PROPERTY TAX-A.B. 1197 ALLOCATION 3,167,516 3,443,341 3,580,456 3,663,000 3,663,000 3,884,071 3,961,753 Subtotal - Taxes and Franchises 35,972,104 38,779,817 43,367,106 43,331,046 45,082,464 45,731,673 46,995,840 Licenses and Permits
41000 - CERT. OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS 21,984 14,200 12,443 12,641 24,271 13,000 14,000 41100 - BUSINESS LICENSE TAX 1,015,753 1,488,390 1,162,270 1,362,115 2,000,000 6,386,628 6,674,027 41101 - BUSINESS LICENSE TAX - DELINQUENT - 3,816 51 - - 3,000 3,000 41105 BUSINESS LICENSE PROCESSING FEE 83,763 97,990 94,995 73,450 90,000 80,000 90,000 41110 BUSINESS LICENSE LATE FEE 109,683 25,035 135,819 23,497 25,000 24,000 25,000 41111 BUSINESS LICENSE DELINQUENT FEE 43,256 6,904 - - 15 - - 41115 SB1186 FEE 7,681 9,133 8,586 6,428 6,428 7,000 8,000 41120 HOME OCCUPATION - PLANNING REVIEW 1,340 676 861 148 143 1,500 1,500 41200 - REGULATORY PERMIT 9,372 19,828 2,546 375 11,568 2,500 3,000 41300 - BUILDING PERMITS 313,402 516,635 478,270 474,003 474,003 700,000 700,000 41350 - AUTOMATED PERMIT SYSTEM 3,205 3,876 3,894 3,686 3,686 4,000 5,000 41400 - PLUMBING PERMITS 43,255 63,860 65,417 49,744 59,023 55,000 60,000 41500 - ELECTRICAL PERMITS 55,265 77,018 105,223 91,921 92,794 150,000 200,000 41700 - HEATING AIR COND PERMIT 31,706 34,748 44,668 36,462 42,940 40,000 45,000 41800 - DOG LICENSE - 155,116 285,324 236,932 236,932 160,000 160,000 41900 - OTHER LICENSE & PERMITS 80,952 99,129 151,328 149,360 160,000 150,000 156,750 42000 - PLAN CHECK FEES 240,130 324,654 837,220 725,643 750,000 900,000 900,000 42300 - STORM DRAIN REVENUE 92,125 99,817 91,035 69,540 80,000 60,000 60,000 46100 - ZONING AND PLANNING FEES 108,205 185,825 132,279 309,681 160,000 170,000 170,000 46350 - RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT - - 231 - 8,500 4,665 4,665 Subtotal - Licenses and Permits 2,261,078 3,226,650 3,612,461 3,625,626 4,225,303 8,911,293 9,279,942 Fines and Forfeitures
42050 - ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION 28,030 5,350 84,955 14,470 20,401 7,000 7,000 42100 - VEHICLE CODE FINES 54,440 46,584 77,360 56,655 56,655 50,000 50,000 42200 - OTHER COURT FINES 869,125 1,056,634 1,036,941 1,242,951 1,242,951 1,250,000 1,250,000 42250 - FINES & VIOLATION- FIREWORKS 500 - - - - - -
Subtotal - Fines and Forfeitures 952,096 1,108,569 1,199,257 1,314,076 1,320,007 1,307,000 1,307,000 Use of Money and Property
43100 - INTEREST INCOME 810,972 147,154 (675,586) 222,560 381,176 664,380 567,250 43116 - INVESTMENT FAIR VALUE GAIN (LOSS) - - - - (227,250) - - 43200 - RENTS AND CONCESSIONS 19,835 20,339 (3,567) 20,000 12,739 13,375 13,776 48820 - RENTALS - - 3 - 5 5 5
Subtotal - Use of Money and Property 830,807 167,492 (679,150) 242,560 166,670 677,760 581,031 Fiscal Years 2019-20 through 2024-25
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Revenue Detail
City of Pico Rivera
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A3

OBJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2019-20

ACTUALS
FY 2020-21

ACTUALS
FY 2021-22

ACTUALS
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
FY 2022-23

YEAR-END

ESTIMATES
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
Fiscal Years 2019-20 through 2024-25
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Revenue Detail
City of Pico Rivera
Charges for Services
42010 - RECORD RETENTION SURCHARGE 2,853 3,250 3,037 3,560 3,560 4,000 4,000 46501 - PARKS AND REC - ADMINISTRATION 1,910 - - 434 - - - 46503 - PARKS AND REC - CHILD SUPERVISION 35,027 - - - - - - 46504 - PARKS AND REC - SPECIAL EVENTS 43,262 1,000 41,197 21,700 50,000 44,000 45,320 46506 - PARKS AND REC - AQUATICS 27,762 - - - - - -
46508 - PARKS AND REC - YOUTH SPORTS 26,626 - 17,790 54,033 30,000 28,935 29,803 46509 - PARKS AND REC - ADULT SPORTS 6,675 - 20,976 21,658 35,000 36,750 37,853 46510 - PARKS AND REC - CONTRACT PROGRAMS 84,090 10,962 42,068 86,800 75,000 82,000 84,460 46511 - PARKS AND REC - FEES & PROGRAMS 3,466 - - 4,297 - - - 46512 - PARKS AND REC - FILED & FACILITY RENTALS 23,142 4,608 74,791 54,250 76,797 73,500 75,705 46513 - PARKS AND REC - BATTING CAGES 1,389 178 2,093 1,953 500 735 757 46514 - PARKS AND REC - TEEN SERVICES 560 - - 434 - - - 46520 - PARKS AND REC - GO GETTERS PROGAM 6,360 5,400 (5,190) 6,510 4,860 5,103 5,256 46601 - PARKS AND REC - TRIPS & TOURS 14,722 - 3,545 27,125 12,000 12,600 12,978 46602 - PARKS AND REC - SENIOR CENTER 29,991 15 4,226 31,861 10,000 10,500 10,815 46603 PARKS AND REC - BUSINESS-FAMILY ENGAGE 1,840 - - 5,642 - 7,400 7,622 46605 - PARKS AND REC - COMMUNITY GARDEN 815 6,555 1,595 3,526 3,340 3,507 3,612 46607 - PARKS AND REC - CAMPS 53,330 34,812 75,950 54,250 35,000 62,000 63,860 46800 - OTHER CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 859 - 989 1,218 - - - 46900 - REPRODUCTION CHARGES 1,457 469 244 1,218 200 100 100 48670 - VENDING MACHINE COMMISSION 271 - - 1,085 - - -
48830 - CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE - - - 9,407 - - -
48835 - TECHNOLOGY SURCHARGE - 34,877 67,328 54,250 65,961 - - 48836 - TRAINING SURCHARGE - - - - 18,880 18,000 18,000 48840 - CURRENT SERVICE CHARGES 5,612 8,217 8,697 - 10,123 6,000 6,000 Subtotal - Charges for Services 372,018 110,343 359,335 445,211 431,221 395,130 406,141 Other Revenue
42302 - FORECLOSURE PRGM-REGISTRATION 43,240 25,190 23,030 23,265 23,265 15,000 15,000 43210 - LEASE REVENUE - - 20,082 - - - -
46000 - IMPOUND SERVICE CHARGE 43,475 54,990 41,093 30,016 39,062 30,000 35,000 46300 - PARKING PERMIT 2,770 2,760 8,234 11,048 100 11,000 11,000 46310 - INOPERATIVE VEHICLE EXTENSION 100 - 76 - 249 250 250 47100 - SALES OF PROPERTY - - - - 928,625 - -
47200 - MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 20,630 15,465 228,581 185,213 337,049 150,000 150,000 47220 - DONATION & SPONSORSHIP - - - - 5,000 - -
47300 - DAMAGES TO CITY PROPERTY - 4,441 48,854 - - 5,000 5,000 47310 - RESTITUTION 765 1,488 200 - 2,284 2,000 2,000
47500 - ST MANDATED COSTS/REIMB 91 154 17,266 - - - -
47610 - COST REIMBURSEMENTS 269,686 115,242 61,995 56,405 281,724 60,000 60,000 47612 - COST RECOVERY-ROAD IMPACTS (RUBBISH VEHICLES) 18,100 18,700 19,000 - 19,700 21,200 21,200 47630 - COST REIMBURSEMENTS-NON CIP DEPOSITS 26,678 9,384 108,868 37,500 - - - 47920 - RECYCLING PROGRAM REVENUE 9,104 245 324 1,932 600 250 250 48970 - CBC REBATE PROGRAM - 32,589 26,404 - 28,158 15,000 15,675 Subtotal - Other Revenue 434,639 280,648 604,007 345,379 1,665,816 309,700 315,375 Intergovernmental Revenue
44000 - STREET & HWY MAINT. SB - - 447,368 - - - -
44800 - FEDERAL GRANTS 62,823 919,448 33,428 - 1 - -
45000 - STATE GRANTS 47,481 201,073 156,409 554,230 68,000 315,000 400,000 45500 - C.O.P.S. PRGM ALLOCATION 155,948 156,727 161,285 150,000 170,000 160,000 163,200 Subtotal - Intergovernmental Revenue 266,251 1,277,247 798,489 704,230 287,432 475,000 563,200 TOTAL - OPERATING REVENUE 41,088,993 44,950,765 49,261,505 50,008,128 53,178,912 57,807,556 59,448,529 47900 Non-Operating Transfers In 1,960,954 1,375,868 12,587,213 1,825,300 1,825,300 1,757,097 1,792,240 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND REVENUE 43,049,947 46,326,633 61,848,718 51,833,428 55,004,212 59,564,653 61,240,769

OBJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2019-20

ACTUALS
FY 2020-21

ACTUALS
FY 2021-22

ACTUALS
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
FY 2022-23

YEAR-END

ESTIMATE
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
51100 - SALARIES 8,713,325 8,713,985 8,347,852 10,396,375 9,444,193 11,619,811 12,146,779 51120 - VACATION/SICK LEAVE ACCT 397,875 470,835 486,269 250,000 572,535 250,000 250,000 51200 - HOURLY SALARIES 1,291,087 736,227 1,238,167 1,759,029 1,303,071 2,296,156 2,371,847 51300 - OVERTIME 138,905 56,237 105,547 108,000 144,257 108,000 108,000 51500 - PUBLIC EMPLOYEE'S RETIREMENT 2,763,273 2,879,775 3,004,883 3,607,416 3,462,463 3,609,651 3,673,577 51501 - PUBLIC AGENCY RETIREMENT 57,462 31,922 44,709 65,157 50,415 90,948 93,827 51504 - DEFERRED COMPENSATION 40,937 37,098 34,644 39,650 64,309 115,419 120,665 51600 - WORKER'S COMPENSATION INS 200,878 117,742 91,978 94,613 - 101,831 122,138 51700 - DISABILITY INSURANCE 78,470 77,232 71,320 97,417 82,805 107,967 111,210 51800 - UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 97,014 207,880 35,459 - 4,863 - - 51900 - GROUP HEALTH & LIFE INS 2,652,531 2,463,440 2,447,558 3,193,415 2,692,874 3,300,607 3,516,087 51901 - CASH BACK INCENTIVE PAY 289,694 281,888 268,505 289,127 267,218 256,897 269,738 51903 - AUTO ALLOWANCE 44,828 53,270 50,345 57,480 51,464 56,280 59,094 51904 - TECHNOLOGY STIPEND 14,129 15,937 14,888 18,750 15,530 17,430 18,303 51905 - BILINGUAL PAY 15,810 14,883 13,393 15,315 25,460 21,240 22,304 51906 - POST EMPLOYMENT HEALTH PLAN 8,437 8,900 9,728 12,531 11,347 11,999 12,597 51907 - OPEB COST ALLOCATION - - 721,310 822,352 565,304 386,385 353,729 51930 - MEDICARE/EMPLOYER PORTION 154,743 146,553 145,144 150,740 183,621 168,486 176,128 51960 - VACANCY SAVINGS - (300,000) (279,000) (400,000) - (400,000) (400,000) 51961 - VACANCY SAVINGS OFFSET - 300,000 279,000 - - - - Subtotal - Salaries and Benefits 16,959,397 16,313,804 17,131,699 20,577,367 18,941,729 22,119,107 23,026,023 52000 - CENTRAL STORES PURCHASE - - - - - - -
52100 - POSTAGE 54,917 44,208 65,553 91,949 58,338 91,949 91,949 52200 - DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 136,171 156,430 182,281 158,219 142,449 183,147 183,200 52205 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 22,147 25,989 21,264 33,743 27,326 35,791 36,291 52210 - SUPPLIES/CHEMICALS 8,017 4,065 13,169 25,895 2,775 25,895 25,895 52230 - SB 1186B ADA EXPENSES 724 1,427 2,585 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 52250 - UNIFORMS 39,684 29,478 40,571 49,627 48,600 54,627 54,627 52255 - PARTICIPANT UNIFORMS 8,183 7,677 3,383 25,497 17,057 30,294 30,294 52300 - ADVERTISING AND PUBLICATIONS 27,915 29,016 85,202 60,631 49,336 54,575 54,575 52400 - PRINT, DUPLICATE & PHOTO 171,551 78,576 126,283 257,252 156,575 295,246 295,246 52500 - ELECTION EXPENSE 421,382 140,684 - 200,000 117,591 - 150,000 52600 - MEMBERSHIP AND DUES 88,556 77,028 93,068 105,436 101,460 116,727 119,182 52700 - BOOKS AND PERIODICALS 1,696 1,720 405 3,050 1,200 3,050 3,050 52800 - SOFTWARE 15,104 108,170 84,609 2,761 66,625 661 661 52805 - SOFTWARE LICENSE 72,012 47,425 223,096 528,672 300,000 543,676 545,901 52900 - COMMISSION STIPENDS 2,200 5,525 3,400 7,500 3,258 9,500 8,500 53100 - AUTOMOBILE SUPPLIES 24,374 39,035 34,053 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 53150 - FUEL 120,444 129,249 170,602 152,500 152,500 165,250 180,250 53200 - MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 1,537 159 166 2,416 750 2,416 2,416 53300 - EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 23,523 33,227 39,038 284,893 44,407 289,172 289,172 53301 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 112,145 6,956 70,374 53,813 127,681 173,590 175,590 53400 - BUILDING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE 146,581 105,341 139,577 182,000 182,000 203,900 218,400 53410 - ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE 25,110 25,316 30,345 33,000 33,000 33,000 33,000 53430 - PAINT SUPPLIES 5,500 3,084 5,254 5,000 5,000 6,000 7,200 53440 - PLUMBING SUPPLIES 21,014 16,196 21,399 30,000 30,000 33,000 36,000 53450 - SWIMMING POOL MAINTENANCE - 601 - 2,600 1,000 2,600 2,600 53500 - SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 41,352 65,964 129,321 95,952 137,079 148,749 149,969 53610 - COST REIMBURSEMENTS 43,276 12,075 - 150 150 150 150 53800 - C.O.P.S. PGRM COSTS 155,948 156,727 161,285 - - - - 54100 - SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSES 658,506 458,510 435,866 1,131,907 371,264 436,454 568,237 54115 - COVID-19 - 48,000 - - - - -
54200 - UTILITIES 1,051,467 959,320 1,071,635 946,000 946,000 1,058,200 1,108,140 54300 - TELEPHONE 195,197 194,224 222,370 97,500 202,500 157,542 245,912 54400 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 402,919 326,678 514,487 2,684,404 800,595 2,199,907 1,977,607 54500 - CONTRACTED SERVICES 15,223,192 14,867,037 6,308,574 16,513,322 19,672,079 18,754,361 19,765,322 54510 - CONTRACT INSTRUCTORS 59,067 6,579 20,469 122,109 49,543 122,109 122,109 54530 - CREDIT CARD SERVICE CHARGE 40,093 6,106 1,194 3,736 2,000 3,736 3,736 54540 - COURT CHARGES 190,237 226,406 263,660 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 54605 - ASPHALT MAINTENANCE 34,418 24,457 20,185 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Fiscal Years 2019-20 through 2024-25
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Expenditure Detail
City of Pico Rivera
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A4

OBJECT DESCRIPTION
FY 2019-20

ACTUALS
FY 2020-21

ACTUALS
FY 2021-22

ACTUALS
FY 2022-23

ADOPTED
FY 2022-23

YEAR-END

ESTIMATE
FY 2023-24

PROPOSED
FY 2024-25

PROPOSED
Fiscal Years 2019-20 through 2024-25
Historical Actuals and Proposed Budget
General Fund Expenditure Detail
City of Pico Rivera
54635 - GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 5,516 2,478 4,188 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 54640 - GRAFFITI ABATEMENT 200,194 164,296 194,107 183,872 183,872 340,152 371,403 54645 - MEDIAN ISLAND MAINTENANCE 4,346 1,976 3,657 296,600 245,600 296,600 296,600 54650 - SIGNAGE 23,574 7,400 14,109 15,000 15,000 16,500 18,150 54655 - STREET LIGHTS/SIGNALS 142,887 39,059 23,016 170,000 170,000 220,000 220,000 54660 - STREET PAINTINGS/MARKINGS 6,835 10,021 9,577 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 54670 - TREE CARE 6,874 3,138 2,984 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 54675 - WEED ABATEMENT 10,716 6,897 12,425 15,000 15,000 15,600 15,600 54700 - INSURANCE & SURETY BOND 254,428 333,986 647,727 972,083 937,441 973,710 1,021,183 54800 - CONVENTION & MTG EXPENSSES 20,403 3,509 49,263 70,989 44,523 75,344 76,344 54810 - EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION 13,916 - 3,226 15,500 15,500 20,000 24,500 54900 - PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 15,595 14,723 11,549 43,018 60,620 43,468 43,768 54910 - TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 21,260 7,111 11,761 25,000 5,000 45,000 45,000 54911 - TUITION ADVANCEMENT 20,761 18,635 4,597 20,000 - - - 54930 - SAFETY PROGRAMS & MATER 11,380 9,801 19,124 26,700 26,700 26,180 26,380 54935 - FIRST AID TREATMENT 1,826 715 1,791 6,000 6,000 7,500 9,000 54940 - ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING 6,467 7,370 975 104,850 103,350 111,850 124,850 55280 - SENIOR CITIZEN COMMITTEE 21,385 14,428 51,098 56,668 26,796 56,641 56,641 55285 - EVENT TICKETS 29,436 10,019 12,528 33,742 26,365 68,266 68,266 56105 - LIABILITY CLAIM PAYMENTS - 70,710 - - - - -
56205 - PERMITS - FEES - LICENSES 27,882 29,056 51,966 75,450 72,458 75,450 75,450 56850 - INTER DEPARTMENTAL CHARGES - - 236,861 226,950 226,950 341,500 341,500 56910 - LEGAL SERVICE 403,739 255,430 504,126 476,660 506,957 589,310 589,810 56978 - PRINCIPAL PAYMENT - 2016 BONDS 900,000 925,000 955,000 995,000 995,000 1,030,000 1,065,000 56979 - INTEREST PAYMENT - 2016 BONDS 1,023,450 998,225 965,250 926,250 926,250 888,775 860,550 56989 - LEASE PAYMENT-2009 LEAS 2,167 - - - - - -
56992 - BANK SERVICE CHARGES 5,994 9,881 41,204 37,500 37,000 46,500 46,500 56993 - MISC. EXPENSES 51 - - - (12) - -
57100 - LAND 6,670 - - - - - -
57220 LEASE PRINCIPAL EXPENDITURE 24,584 - - - -
57230 LEASE INTEREST EXPENDITURE 2,497 - - - -
57300 - FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 145,586 176,349 51,959 12,500 201,450 68,900 38,900 57850 CONTRA DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS - - (1,816) - (11,835) - - 57900 REPLACEMENT ACCOUNT - - - - - 330,023 330,023
58500 - BAD DEBT 37,337 53,328 - - - - -
Subtotal - Maintenance and Operations 23,016,830 21,642,206 14,514,055 29,043,366 29,033,994 31,269,043 32,597,099 TOTAL - OPERATING EXPENDITURES 39,976,227 37,956,010 31,645,754 49,620,733 47,975,722 53,388,150 55,623,122 Non-Operating Transfer Out - 801,650 18,642,135 2,212,695 2,774,613 6,176,503 5,617,647 TOTAL - GENERAL FUND EXPEND 39,976,227 38,757,660 50,287,889 51,833,428 50,750,336 59,564,653 61,240,769 Actuals Actuals Actuals Adopted Budget
Year-End
Estimate Proposed Budget Proposed Budget
FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 *Excluding General Fund

ADMINISTRATION
Fund: 221 California Beverage Container Revenue 969 15,968 15,266 15,118 150 15,780 670 221 California Beverage Container Expenditure 15,877 15,639 1,807 15,800 5,702 15,500 - 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Revenue 16,750,457 14,818,840 18,367,968 20,381,163 24,352,389 23,655,274 26,168,819 560 Pico Rivera Innovative Municipal Energy (PRIME) Expenditure 12,800,548 16,215,633 17,222,541 17,410,535 18,675,360 18,741,010 21,681,990 590 Recreation Area Complex Revenue 290,514 405,791 341,878 1,078 308,595 330,376 338,190 590 Recreation Area Complex Expenditure 358,995 691,234 176,188 139,780 (4,035) 158,486 161,696 670 Used Oil Recycle Revenue 34,891 7,948 (1,244) 7,940 262 10,420 10,410 670 Used Oil Recycle Expenditure 14,888 18,754 7,693 26,562 - 26,562 26,562 671 CalRecycle Revenue - - 177,871 83,856 315,530 215,655 258,786 671 CalRecycle Expenditure - - 170,562 218,929 109,396 226,777 233,815

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Fund: 105 Liability Claims Revenue - 101,500 - - 282,829 170,000 170,000 105 Liability Claims Expenditure 65,731 99,722 26,640 - 122,339 170,000 170,000 106 Workers Compensation Claims Revenue - 417,500 - - 519,176 171,500 171,500 106 Workers Compensation Claims Expenditure 168,982 171,078 176,771 - 115,882 171,500 171,500 170 Equipment Replacement Revenue - 3,200 1,225,766 226,950 223,922 349,281 347,101 170 Equipment Replacement Expenditure 19,273 (6,000) 12,229 226,950 273,760 331,000 331,000 300 2009 Lease Revenue Bond Revenue - - - - - -
300 2009 Lease Revenue Bond Expenditure - 86 - - - -
450 Financial System Replacement Revenue - 257,650 - - 87,913 - - 450 Financial System Replacement Expenditure 75,504 87,913 - - - - - 551 Water Enterprise Revenue 42 31 (34,780) 30 7,689 41,600 35,520 551 Water Enterprise Expenditure - - - - - - -
640 American Recovery Plan Revenue - - 10,227,800 - - - - 640 American Recovery Plan Expenditure - - 10,227,800 770,391 - - - 851 Successor - DS Fund Revenue 3,869,224 5,403,738 8,595,990 1,065,000 1,164,737 1,065,000 1,065,000 851 Successor - DS Fund Expenditure 2,801,569 2,321,101 2,680,528 83,280 338,827 234,287 184,385 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund Revenue 4,374,206 4,293,747 4,768,492 31,227 1,124,230 121,920 104,100 852 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund Expenditure 3,861,483 5,403,730 2,104,937 - - - - 855 Successor Bond Fund Revenue 8,965 1,536 - 1,485 - - - 855 Successor Bond Fund Expenditure - - 408,371 - - - - 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust Revenue 26,759 285,165 (192,302) - 52,266 - - 875 Section 115 PRSP-Trust Expenditure - - - - 3,448 - -

COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Fund: 255 Economic Development Sustainability Revenue 24,234 3,829 94,111 3,755 3,444 18,630 15,910 255 Economic Development Sustainability Expenditure 98,950 40,000 396,667 - - - - 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Revenue 826,228 643,248 866,874 626,682 695,000 641,377 600,000 280 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Expenditure 1,075,088 624,778 509,421 424,088 695,846 641,377 600,000 282 HOME Program Revenue 333,485 117,940 282,518 3,661 34,115 9,000 9,000 282 HOME Program Expenditure - - 193 - - - -
283 CalHome Revenue 23,340 77,448 270,913 - 700 - -
283 CalHome Expenditure - - - - - - -
290/291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) Revenue 5,235,504 5,642,154 6,879,845 5,216,480 6,193,483 5,791,809 5,788,879 290/291 Housing Assistance Program (Section 8) Expenditure 5,339,596 5,776,381 6,075,407 6,062,675 6,129,251 6,121,110 6,146,054 All Funds Revenue and Expenditures*
FY 2019-20 - FY 2021-22 Actuals
FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget & Year-End Estimate
FY 2023-2025 Proposed Budget
Enclosure 1, Exhibit A5
Actuals Actuals Actuals Adopted Budget
Year-End
Estimate Proposed Budget Proposed Budget
FY 2019-20 FY 2020-21 FY 2021-22 FY 2022-23 FY 2022-23 FY 2023-24 FY 2024-25 All Funds Revenue and Expenditures*
FY 2019-20 - FY 2021-22 Actuals
FY 2022-23 Adopted Budget & Year-End Estimate
FY 2023-2025 Proposed Budget

PUBLIC WORKS
Fund: 200 Air Quality Improvement (AB 2766) Revenue 88,333 63,153 74,158 82,270 43,023 90,030 88,710 200 Air Quality Improvement (AB 2766) Expenditure 53,592 29,325 44,886 34,600 33,452 34,600 34,600 201 State Gas Tax (Highway Users Tax) Revenue 2,519,447 1,375,868 1,478,980 1,835,993 1,083,838 1,757,098 1,792,240 201 State Gas Tax (Highway Users Tax) Expenditure 4,241,081 1,375,868 1,478,980 1,825,300 957,004 1,757,098 1,792,240 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief Revenue - 1,276,135 1,192,508 1,439,642 817,156 1,536,363 1,567,090 202 SB1 - Traffic Congestion Relief Expenditure - 155,332 626,975 1,490,918 911,332 1,513,154 1,317,930 206 Proposition C Revenue 1,091,381 1,084,335 1,274,847 1,286,535 1,326,032 1,543,750 1,599,672 206 Proposition C Expenditure 484,123 389,166 968,873 1,300,000 599,369 1,398,000 1,465,000 207 Measure R Revenue 3,408,832 3,618,824 5,687,464 961,871 1,160,987 1,148,087 1,191,449 207 Measure R Expenditure 4,961,904 2,473,430 4,596,616 1,275,000 345,717 1,315,015 1,325,015 208 Measure M Revenue 893,737 911,671 1,119,482 1,088,958 1,107,219 1,270,180 4,523,860 208 Measure M Expenditure 1,339,851 1,157,620 946,461 1,386,169 67,939 1,709,436 4,383,169 209 Measure W Revenue - 882,992 872,171 954,810 901,754 954,810 954,810 209 Measure W Expenditure - 237,936 355,229 895,000 136,193 1,080,000 930,000 210 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Revenue 81,667 30,880 40,126 80,000 - 71,888 75,123 210 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Expenditure 77,336 34,926 34,064 80,000 17,984 50,000 90,000 220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) Revenue 126,317 179,655 119,514 140,534 141,844 162,500 150,670 220 Public Image Enhancement (PIE) Expenditure 16,285 11,662 - - - - - 225 Sewer Maintenance Revenue 1,548 1,832 638 1,600 77 - - 225 Sewer Maintenance Expenditure 359,572 23,383 37,971 31,000 16,687 - - 230 Landscape and Lighting Maint Assessment District Revenue 1,743,325 1,796,080 1,934,108 1,101,592 1,766,102 1,864,468 1,916,797 230 Landscape and Lighting Maint Assessment District Expenditure 1,238,823 3,438,190 1,160,038 908,403 333,862 1,035,722 1,071,857 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District Revenue 10,074 10,286 9,461 10,339 6,217 1,200 1,030 231 Paramount/Mines Assessment District Expenditure - - - - - - - 263 Passons Grade Separation Revenue - - - - - - -
263 Passons Grade Separation Expenditure - - - - - - -
270 Park Development Revenue 5,109 875 (3,688) 847 (1,885) 4,430 3,780 270 Park Development Expenditure - - - - 227,000 - -
305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation Revenue 1,022,417 836,929 840,482 836,169 148,864 831,669 836,669 305 2018 Series A Certificates of Participation Expenditure 892,589 891,918 3,172,325 836,169 6,262,006 1,369,669 836,669 400 Capital Improvement Revenue 19,671 - 11,577,135 1,147,695 1,147,695 - - 400 Capital Improvement Expenditure 1,021,034 (22,835) 219,002 506,390 90,268 770,390 7,019,632 550 Water Authority Revenue 12,398,054 12,260,343 12,457,186 12,567,683 9,735,886 12,049,675 12,011,345 550 Water Authority Expenditure 8,442,501 9,964,320 9,570,525 23,361,728 15,480,074 18,623,929 17,960,464 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Federal Revenue - - - - - - - 638 Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) Federal Expenditure - - - - - - - 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Revenue - - 34,034 6,458,823 270,861 3,869,647 14,173,154 661 Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Expenditure - - 36,033 6,458,823 267,887 3,869,647 14,173,154 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants Revenue 182,238 63,039 - 60,000 - 10,093,531 93,531 697 Miscellaneous Local Grants Expenditure 103,964 4,200 172,402 166,601 232,073 10,195,591 196,789 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants Revenue 682,457 114,280 251,764 - 431,927 8,379,390 - 698 Miscellaneous Federal Grants Expenditure 611,929 176,500 105,485 - 771,934 8,379,390 - 699 Miscellaneous State Grants Revenue 164,635 97,119 310,872 4,185,948 5,651 9,366,278 4,500,000 699 Miscellaneous State Grants Expenditure 138,496 437,588 159,013 4,185,948 140,363 9,764,400 4,995,158

PARKS AND RECREATION
Fund: 205 Proposition A Revenue 1,330,905 1,300,424 1,548,028 1,571,293 1,570,323 1,847,270 1,916,719 205 Proposition A Expenditure 1,175,233 1,172,914 1,095,029 1,776,463 748,231 2,220,188 2,259,056 215 Measure A Revenue - 70,995 - - - 150,000 808,356
215 Measure A Expenditure 70,995 - - - - 150,000 808,356 250 Cable/PEG Support Revenue 163,934 76,128 76,394 23,000 36,855 - - 250 Cable/PEG Support Expenditure 23,327 21,497 38,233 37,355 7,673 37,355 37,355 570 Golf Course Revenue 775,137 1,437,035 847,877 1,050,000 600,640 877,500 943,400 570 Golf Course Expenditure 1,052,097 1,296,142 1,254,001 1,346,818 1,279,670 1,662,656 1,665,204 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Hopes Revenue 1,088,908 990,203 911,925 1,140,249 363,346 1,265,914 1,263,704 690 Recreation & Education Accelerating Children's Hopes Expenditure 923,848 946,511 976,826 1,122,904 870,681 1,324,821 1,360,262 ALL FUNDS* TOTAL REVENUE 59,596,944 60,976,315 94,542,431 65,690,276 58,030,841 91,743,300 85,495,995 ALL FUNDS* TOTAL EXPENDITURES 53,925,063 55,675,557 67,246,807 74,404,579 56,263,175 95,098,670 93,428,912 *Excluding General Fund 5,671,880 5,300,758 27,295,624 (8,714,303) 1,767,666 (3,355,370) (7,932,917) Fiscal Year 2023-25 Proposed Budget

ADMINISTRATION
City Council
City Manager
City Attorney
Office of
Innovation & Communications
Director
Analyst
Assistant City
Manager
City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Junior Deputy
City Clerk
Sheriff Captain Director of Public
Works
Director of Community
and Economic
Development
Director of Parks
and Recreation
Director of
Administrative
Services
Residents of the City of Pico Rivera
Office of
Sustainability
Principal Analyst
Coordinator (PRIME)
Administration
Technician
Director of Human
Resources
Sr. Executive
Assistant
Secretary
Enclosure 1, Exhibit B
Fiscal Year 2023-25 Proposed Budget

COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Executive Assistant Director
Secretary
Economic
Development
Division
Housing
Division
(Section 8 &
CDBG)
Planning Division
Planning
Commission
Deputy Director
Manager
Senior Planner
Secretary
Analyst
(2)
Senior
Analyst
Building
Technician
Advanced
Strategic
Planning
Assistant Planner (2)
Senior Planner
Specialist (2)
Secretary
Senior Inspector
Planner
Officers (4)
Parking Division
Counter Service Rep
Coordinator
Current
Planning
Officers (4)
Building Official
Building &
Neighborhood
Improvement Division
Emergency Services
Fiscal Year 2023-25 Proposed Budget

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Director
Revenue/Utility Billing
Division Accounting Division
Deputy Director
Account Clerk
III
Account
Clerk III
Finance
Technician
Payroll Division
Supervisor
(Revenue)
Purchasing
Division
Finance
Technician
Account
Clerk II
Account
Clerk II
Senior Manager
Information Technology
Division
Senior I.T.

Manager
I.T.

Technician
Accountant III
Senior Manager
Accountant I
Executive Assistant
Technician
(B.L.)
Analyst
Fiscal Year 2023-25 Proposed Budget

HUMAN RESOURCES
Director
Coordinator
Senior Analyst
Senior
Technician
Fiscal Year 2023-25 Proposed Budget

*All operations, duties, or programs may be assigned to different staff as needed throughout the fiscal year, and each position is subject to additional duties as assigned.

Supervisor
Special Events
Christmas Baskets
Volunteer
Organizations
Other Duties as
Assigned

PARKS AND RECREATION
Executive
Assistant Director
Analyst
Transit
Budget
Grants
Special Assignments
Supervisor
Senior Center
Senior Clubs Liaison
Other Duties as
Assigned
Recreation
Commission
Manager
Coordinator
(2)
Rec. Guide
Marketing
Campaigns
Publications
Graphic Design
Special
Assignments
Technician
Television
Film/Video
Marketing
Profile
Social Media
Press / Media
Digital Media Assistant
Photography
Videographer
Drone Operation
Supervisor
Aquatics
Comm. Sports Groups
Field Reservations
REACH
Other Duties as
Assigned
Pico Rivera Golf
Course
Marketing &
Communications
Senior Technician
Videography
Marketing
CTV3
Film/Video Editing
Supervisor
Day Camps
Crossing Guards
Community Gardens
Trips & Tours
Contract Classes
Other Duties as
Assigned
Supervisor
(2)
Recreation Guide / Publications
Special & Marketing Campaigns
PEG TV Channel 3
Graphic Design / PR Magazine
Other Duties as Assigned
Senior Analyst
Budget
Grants
Golf Course
Special Projects
Other Duties as Assigned
Coordinator
Coordinator
Case Worker
Coordinator
Coordinator
Admin. Clerk (3)
Facility Rentals
-Pico Park
-Senior Center
-Smith Park
Transit
REACH
Coordinator
REACH
Coordinator
Manager
Coordinator
Fiscal Year 2023-25 Proposed Budget
Ad
e
e

PUBLIC WORKS
Water
Systems
Operator I (3)
Customer Service
Representative
SupervisorParks
Maintenance
Worker II
(7)
Crew Leader
(4)
Water
Systems
Operator II (3)
SupervisorFacilities
Facility
Maintenance
Worker II
(2)
Facility
Maintenance
Worker III
(3)
Facility
Maintenance
Worker I
(3)
Crew Leader
(2)
Maintenance
Worker II
(5)
Utilities
Superintendent
Maintenance
Worker I
(1)
Associate
Engineer
Assistant
Engineer
Inspector
Counter Service
Representative
Maintenance
Worker I
(4)
Senior
Engineer
Custodian
(2)
Field Services
Manager
Water
Systems
Operator III
(1)
Secretary
SupervisorStreets
Equipment
Mechanic II
Technician
Senior Analyst
Secretary
Executive
Assistant
Assistant City
Engineer
Principal Analyst
Deputy Director
Director
Treatment
Operator III
(1)
SupervisorDistribution
SupervisorTreatment/
Production
Treatment
Operator II
(2)
Treatment
Operator I (1)
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Proposed Filled Vacancies
FY 23-24
Proposed
FY 24-25
Proposed
City Manager / City Council
City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Director 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Principal Analyst 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Secretary 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Sr. Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administration Technician 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00

9.00 9.00 8.00 -1.00 9.00 9.00
City Clerk
City Clerk 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy City Clerk 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Junior Deputy City Clerk 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00 1.00 -1.00 3.00 3.00
Administrative Services
Director of Administrative Services 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director of Administrative Services 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 Coordinator 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Clerk 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Manager - Accounting 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Senior Manager - Budget 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant III 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Accountant I 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Finance Technician 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00
I.T. Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
I.T. Manager 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior I.T. Manager 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Account Clerk III 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Account Clerk II 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Supervisor 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Analyst 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

16.00 18.00 13.00 -1.00 18.00 18.00
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2023-25 (Proposed)
Enclosure 1, Exhibit C
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Proposed Filled Vacancies
FY 23-24
Proposed
FY 24-25
Proposed
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2023-25 (Proposed)
Human Resources
Director of Human Resources 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Human Resources Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Technician 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Senior Technician 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Coordinator 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00
Community and Economic Development
Director of Community and Economic Development 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Deputy Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Analyst (Economic Development) 2.00 2.00 1.00 -1.00 2.00 2.00 Principal Planner (Planning Manager) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Planner 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Planner 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Technician (Building) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Technician (CED) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Technician (Planning) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Neighborhood Improvement Officer 4.00 4.00 4.00 -1.00 4.00 4.00 Coordinator (Parking Enforcement) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Enforcement Officer 3.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 4.00 Supervisor (Housing) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Manager (Housing) 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Coordinator (Housing) 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing Program Specialist 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 Secretary 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Inspector 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Building Official 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Counter Service Representative 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

31.00 30.00 23.00 -4.00 30.00 30.00
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Proposed Filled Vacancies
FY 23-24
Proposed
FY 24-25
Proposed
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2023-25 (Proposed)
Parks and Recreation
Director of Parks and Recreation 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Manager 2.00 2.00 0.00 -2.00 2.00 2.00
Supervisor 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 6.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Caseworker 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Coordinator 8.00 9.00 8.00 -1.00 9.00 9.00
Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Administrative Clerk 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00
Senior Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Digital and Media Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00

27.00 28.00 24.00 -4.00 28.00 28.00
Public Works
Director of Public Works 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant City Engineer 1.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Deputy Director / City Engineer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Senior Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Assistant Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Associate Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Inspector 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Public Works Inspector 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Utilities Manager 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Utilities Superintendent 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Water Supervisor 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Supervisor 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00
Field Services Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Water Systems Operator I 4.00 3.00 4.00 0.00 3.00 3.00
Water Systems Operator II 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 Water Systems Operator III 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Water Treatment Operator I 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Water Treatment Operator II 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 Water Treatment Operator III 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Customer Service Representative 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Water Distribution Supervisor 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Water Treatment Supervisor 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Facilities Maintenance Worker I 3.00 3.00 2.00 -1.00 3.00 3.00 Facilities Maintenance Worker II 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 Facilities Maintenance Worker III 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 Maintenance Crew Leader 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 6.00
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Proposed Filled Vacancies
FY 23-24
Proposed
FY 24-25
Proposed
Proposed Positions, by Classification and Department
Authorized, Filled and Vacant
Fiscal Year 2023-25 (Proposed)
Maintenance Worker I / II 17.00 17.00 14.00 -3.00 17.00 17.00 Principal Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Senior Analyst 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Technician (Engineering) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Counter Service Representative 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Executive Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Secretary 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Equipment Mechanic II 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Custodian 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2.00

64.00 67.00 57.00 -6.00 67.00 67.00
TOTALS 154.00 159.00 130.00 -17.00 159.00 159.00
Department
FY 22-23
Adopted
FY 23-24
Proposed Filled Vacancies
FY 23-24
Proposed
FY 24-25
Proposed
Administration 12.00 12.00 9.00 -2.00 12.00 12.00
Administrative Services 16.00 18.00 13.00 -1.00 18.00 18.00 Human Resources 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 4.00
Community and Economic Development 31.00 30.00 23.00 -4.00 30.00 30.00 Parks and Recreation 27.00 28.00 24.00 -4.00 28.00 28.00 Public Works 64.00 67.00 57.00 -6.00 67.00 67.00
TOTAL 154.00 159.00 130.00 -17.00 159.00 159.00
FY 23-25 Proposed New
Administrative Services
Analyst (New) 1.00
Total Administrative Services 1.00
Community & Economic Development
Parking Enforcement Officer (New) 1.00
Total Community & Economic Development 1.00
Parks & Rec
Manager (New) 1.00
Total Parks & Rec 1.00
Public Works - needs to be updated
Water Treatment Operator II 2.00
Water Treatment Supervisor (Distribution) 1.00
Total Public Works 3.00
TOTALS 6.00
FY 23-25 Proposed New
Administrative Services 1.00
Community & Economic Development 1.00
Parks & Rec 1.00
Public Works 3.00
TOTAL 6.00
The Proposed FY 2023-25 budget includes 6 new positions.

Proposed New Positions, by Classification and Department Proposed Position Additions
Fiscal Year 2023-25
FY 23-25 Proposed Reclassifications
Administration
Junior Deputy City Clerk (Reclass to Deputy City Clerk) 1.00 Total Administration 1.00
Administrative Services
I.T. Manager (Reclass to Senior I.T. Manager) 1.00
Coordinator (Reclass to Supervisor) 1.00
Senior Analyst (Reclass to Senior Manager) 1.00
Total Administrative Services 3.00
Community & Economic Development
Technician (Reclass to Assistant Planner) 1.00
Principal Planner (Reclass to Senior Planner) 1.00
Housing Supervisor (Reclass to Manager) 1.00
Total Community & Economic Development 3.00
Human Resources
Technician (Reclass to Senior Technician) 1.00
Executive Assistant (Reclass to Coordinator) 1.00
Total Human Resources 2.00
Public Works
Water Systems Operator I (Reclass to Water Treatment Operator I) 1.00 Water Systems Operator III (Reclass to Water Treatment Operator III) 1.00 Utilities Manager (Reclass to Superintendent) 1.00
Senior Water Supervisor (Reclass to Water Treatment Supervisor) 1.00 Total Public Works 4.00
TOTALS 13.00
FY 23-25 Proposed Reclassifications
Administration 1.00
Administrative Services 3.00
Community & Economic Development 3.00
Human Resources 2.00
Public Works 4.00
TOTAL 13.00
The Proposed FY 2023-25 budget includes 13 positions for reclassification.

Proposed Reclassification Positions, by Classification and Department Proposed Position Reclassifications
Fiscal Year 2023-25
FY 23-25 Proposed Eliminations
Administration
Junior Deputy City Clerk 1.00
Total Administration 1.00
Administrative Services
I.T. Manager 1.00
Coordinator 1.00
Senior Analyst 1.00
Total Administrative Services 3.00
Community & Economic Development
Technician 1.00
Principal Planner 1.00
Housing Supervisor 1.00
Housing Coordinator 1.00
Total Community & Economic Development 4.00
Human Resources
Technician 1.00
Executive Assistant 1.00
Total Human Resources 2.00
Public Works
Utilities Manager 1.00
Senior Supervisor (Water) 1.00
Water Systems Operator I 1.00
Water Systems Operator III 1.00
Total Public Works 4.00
TOTALS 14.00
FY 23-25 Proposed Eliminations
Administration 1.00
Administrative Services 3.00
Community & Economic Development 4.00
Human Resources 2.00
Public Works 4.00
TOTAL 14.00
The Proposed FY 2023-25 budget includes 14 positions for elimination.

Proposed Eliminations Positions, by Classification and Department Proposed Position Eliminations
Fiscal Year 2023-25
Project by FY, including both funded and unfunded projects Projects
Net Adjusted
Carryover
Sum of FY
2023‐2024
Sum of FY
2024‐2025
Sum of FY
2025‐2026
Sum of FY
2026‐2027
Sum of FY
2027‐2028
Sum of 5‐Year
Total Budget
Ongoing 59,412,205 48,241,638 41,599,642 45,757,174 5,891,591 1,500,000 202,402,250 1STREETS 11,241,049 7,839,632 1,300,000 1,300,000 700,000 700,000 23,080,681 Annual Signing and Striping ‐ Ongoing 46,614 46,614
Durfee Ave Underpass Project 105,450 40,000 145,450
Major Corridors Median Beautification Project 1,581,442 4,169,479 400,000 400,000 6,550,921Overlay Improvements on Whittier Boulevard 95,744 95,744 Residential Resurfacing Program ‐ Chip Seal 119,868 119,868 Residential Resurfacing Program ‐ Overlay & Reconstruction ‐ Ongoing 5,561,436 100,000 5,661,436 Residential Resurfacing Program ‐ Slurry and Cape Seal . 469,520 469,520 Restoration of Entrance Monuments 77,647 77,647
Rosemead Blvd Median Beautification Project 1,552,174 3,530,153 200,000 200,000 5,482,327 Rosemead Boulevard Road Resurfacing Project (North of Whittier Boulevard) 734,239 734,239 Rosemead/Beverly Rd IntersecƟon Improvements ‐ Hot Spots ‐ Grant, not Measure R Local Return 831,800 831,800Telegraph Rd Traffic Enhancements Project Phase II 3,501 3,501 Telegraph Road over Rio Hondo Channel Bridge Project 30,092 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 830,092Underpasses Improvements (Passons, Paramount & Rosemead) BOD Report 31,521 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,031,521 2BRIDGES 11,001,822 4,530,414 17,684,654 39,097,174 3,091,591 75,405,655 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Prog‐Coop Agreement with LACPW 50,869 50,869 Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project 8,014,701 8,014,701Rehabilitation Telegraph Rd Bridge Over San Gabriel River 2,536,623 1,638,248 12,331,730 14,310,102 30,816,703 Rehabilitation Washington Blvd Bridge Over Rio Hondo River 248,839 2,892,166 5,052,924 24,787,072 3,091,591 36,072,592Slauson Avenue over San Gabriel River Bridge Seismic Retrofit 27,868 27,868 Whittier Blvd. Underpass East of Orange St. Slope Repairs 122,922 300,000 422,922 3WATER 17,752,965 11,120,000 7,698,000 3,463,000 500,000 40,533,965 Advance Metering Infrastructure (AMI) 632,566 400,000 1,032,566 City Yard Generator, Transfer Switch & Main Electrical Panel 211,624 65,000 276,624 Construction ‐ Water Main Replacement (W41,W98,W110) 6,502,455 6,502,455Design ‐ Water Main Replacement (W41, W98, W110) 1,698,301 1,698,301 Garrick, Olympic, Spruce, Calada, Water Main Replacement 144,922 144,922 PFAS Treatment System Project 4,136,810 4,136,810
PFAS Treatment System Project ‐ Phase II ‐ Federalize 3,350,000 3,350,000 Plant No. 3 Electrical Control and MCC Panel 211,799 211,799 Pressure Relief Sustaining Valve Stations 429,655 150,000 579,655Storage Tanks 600,000 2,544,000 3,490,000 6,634,000

Page 1 of 4 ends

Pico Rivera City CouncilJune 27, 2023

Pico Rivera City Council
June 27, 2023