Pico Rivera City Council
May 12, 2026

*Commissioners receive a $30.00 stipend per each meeting held and attended. .

Tuesday, May 12, 2026
Regular Meeting 6:00 p.m.

Council Chamber
6615 Passons Boulevard
Next Resolution No. 7475
Next Ordinance No. 1208
Next Agreement No. 26-2544
Housing Assistance Agency
Next Resolution No. HA-112
Next Ordinance No. HA-16
Water Authority
Next Resolution No. WA-26-37
Next Ordinance No. WA-26-01
Next Agreement No. WA-26-83
Public Financing Authority
Next Resolution No. PFA-26-13
ROLL CALL:

Mayor/Chairman/President:

Gustavo V. Camacho
Mayor Pro Tempore/Vice Chairman/Vice President:

Dr. Monica Sánchez
Councilmembers/Directors/Commissioners:

John R. Garcia
Andrew C. Lara
Erik Lutz
INVOCATION:

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

COMMISSIONERS SCHEDULED TO BE PRESENT:

Esther Celiz, Planning Commission
Efrain Hernandez, Veterans Commission
SPECIAL PRESENTATION:
• Certificates of Recognition – Pico Rivera Dons Flag Gold, Jr. Gremlin Gold, Gremlin Blue Football teams
• Proclamation – 57th Annual Professional Municipal Clerks Week • Proclamation – 2026 National Public Works Week

PLEASE TURN OFF OR SILENCE CELL PHONES WHILE MEETING IS IN SESSION

AND PLEASE REFRAIN FROM TEXTING DURING THE MEETING
**Any invocation that may be offered before the official start of the Council meeting shall be the voluntary offering of a private citizen, to and for the benefit of the Council. The views or beliefs expressed by the invocation speaker have not been previously reviewed or approved by the Council, and the Council does not endorse the religious beliefs or views of this, or any other invocation speaker.
**************************************************************************************************** In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the City of Pico Rivera is committed to providing reasonable accommodations for a person with a disability. Please call the City Clerk’s office at (562) 801-4389, if special accommodation is necessary and/or if information is needed in an alternative format. Special requests must be made in a reasonable amount of time in order that accommodation to be arranged (within 24 to 48 hours’ notice).

Meeting jointly and regularly with the Pico Rivera *Housing Assistance Agency (as needed); Pico Rivera Water Authority (as needed); and Public Financing Authority (as needed) 5-12-2026 Agenda City Council

PUBLIC HEARING:

City Council:

1. Public Hearing – Ordinance Adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing to Title 8, Health and Safety of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code. (1300) a) Open public hearing
b) Memo from City Manager
c) Written Communications
d) Oral Communications
e) Close public hearing
f) Recommendation:

1. Conduct a public hearing;

2. Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing to Title 8, Health and Safety of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code; and

3. Find the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3).

Ordinance No. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.70,
SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT HOUSING TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND

SAFETY, OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST READING

AND INTRODUCTION)
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENT ON ANY AGENDA OR NON-AGENDA ITEM, PLEASE

SUBMIT A PUBLIC COMMENT REQUEST OR WRITTEN COMMENT ONLINE PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING BY CLICKING HERE OR VISITING THE CITY’S WEBSITE AT WWW.PICO-RIVERA.ORG.

When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and city of residency for the record. You have three (3) minutes to make your remarks. In accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2, members of the City Council may only: 1) respond briefly to statements made or questions posed by the public; 2) ask a question for clarification; 3) provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information; 4) request staff to report to the City Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter raised by the public; and 5) direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.

City Council members cannot comment on items that are not listed on a posted agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS:

All items listed on the Consent Calendar may be acted on by a single motion without separate discussion. Any motion relating to a Resolution or Ordinance shall also waive the reading of the titles in full and include its adoption as appropriate. If discussion or separate vote on any item is desired by a Councilmember or staff, that item may be pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate consideration.
5-12-2026 Agenda City Council

CONSENT CALENDAR:

City Council:

2. Minutes:
• City Council regular meeting of April 14, 2026 and special meeting of May 5, 2026
Recommendation: Approve

3. 16th Warrant Register of the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year. (700) Check Numbers: 300473-300616
Special Check Numbers: None
Recommendation: Approve

4. Resolution to Adopt the Citywide Comprehensive Safety Action Plan, (NonCIP No. 30060). (1000) Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution to adopt the Citywide Comprehensive Safety Action Plan and Vision Zero Policy for the City of Pico Rivera.

Resolution No. _____ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE

COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN AND VISION ZERO POLICY

FOR THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION
REGULAR AGENDA:

City Council:

5. Fiscal Year 2025-26 Third Quarter Budget Report as of March 31, 2026. (700) Recommendation:

1. Receive and file the Third Quarter Budget Report ending March 31, 2026, which represents the balances and activities for the first three (3) quarters (July 2025 through March 2026) of the fiscal year (FY) 2025-26;

2. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget by transferring $5,800,000 from the Road Resurfacing Program - Overlay and Reconstruction project Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funding to three (3) street projects: $2,300,000 to the Citywide Residential Slurry Seal Project, $3,000,000 to the Citywide Cape Seal Project, and $500,000 to the Citywide Concrete Curb, Gutter, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Ramp Repairs Project;

3. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget by appropriating $325,000 from the Measure R Fund balance for the Installation of safety crosswalks and ADA Improvements at Marjorie Street and Passons Boulevard;

4. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget by reducing $96,000 from the General Fund, Community and Economic Development 5-12-2026 Agenda City Council

(CED) budget and transferring those funds from the General Fund to the Equipment Replacement Fund;

5. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget by transferring $120,000 from the General Fund, CED budget to the General Fund NonDepartmental budget;

6. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Authorized Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Positions by reclassifying two (2) Account Clerk II positions to Account Clerk III; and

7. Approve an amendment to the FY 2025-26 Adopted Budget by transferring $25,000 from the General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Legal Aid Fund and appropriating those funds to the Assistance Program.

CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS
GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234

REPORTS, NEW BUSINESS, OLD BUSINESS)
CLOSED SESSION:
a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 549569(d)(1)
City of Pico Rivera v. Super Lodging Services, LLC, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 26STCV11523
ADJOURNMENT:

AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
I, Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk, for the City of Pico Rivera, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing notice was posted at the Pico Rivera City Hall bulletin board, Pico Rivera website www.pico-rivera.org, Pico Rivera Post Office which are available for the public to view on this 7th, day of May 2026.

Dated this 7th of May 2026.

Cynthia Ayala, CMC
City Clerk
SB343 NOTICE
In compliance with and pursuant to the provisions of SB343 any public writing distributed by the City Clerk to at least a majority of the City Council Members regarding any item on this regular meeting agenda will be available on the City’s website.

STATEMENT REGARDING DECORUM AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS
If you wish to speak at the time set aside for public comments, the City Council has established the following standards and Rules of Decorum as allowed by State law. • Public comments are limited to those portions of the meeting referred to as Public Comments. These portions are intended for members of the public to address the City Council, Housing Assistance Agency or Water Authority on matters related to agendas or any other items under the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council or Agencies. Please submit your electronic written comment or your request to speak prior to the start of the meeting at 6:00 p.m.

Once the meeting has begun, no further comments will be accepted. • Public Hearing Comment requests – are for those wishing to address the Council/Agency on a specific Public Hearing item only.
• All other Public Comment requests – are for those wishing to address the Council/Agency on agenda items or any other items under the subject jurisdiction of the City Council/Agency.
• Citizens may address the Council, Water Authority or Housing Assistance Agency once for a maximum of three minutes. After each speaker returns to his/her seat, the Mayor shall determine the time and manner of response, but typically if answers are available, they will be given after all speakers have had an opportunity to address the City Council. • Members of the audience are asked to refrain from clapping or otherwise speaking from their seats. Those not meeting the standards for decorum may be escorted from the meeting.

RULES OF DECORUM CAN BE FOUND IN THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

2.08.050 AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE 783 ADOPTED ON AUGUST 20, 1990 AND AMENDED BY ORDINANCES 822 (SEPTEMBER 21, 1992) AND 1020 (MARCH 21, 2006).

To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8.70, SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT HOUSING TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND

SAFETY OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST

READING AND INTRODUCTION)
Recommendation:

1. Conduct a public hearing;

2. Introduce and waive the first reading of an Ordinance adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing to Title 8, Health and Safety of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code; and

3. Find the ordinance exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3).

Strategic Priority:
4 - Health, Wellness & Safety - Create a safe and thriving City with low crime and high standards for health and wellness.

Strategy:

4.4 Promote healthy living to maintain a thriving population.

Fiscal Impact:

Implementation of the proposed ordinance may result in minor administrative costs associated with public outreach, education, and enforcement. These costs are expected to be absorbed within existing departmental budgets. Any revenue generated from citations is anticipated to be minimal and will be recorded in General Ledger Account No. 100.00.0000-42050 (Administrative Citation).

Background:

This report provides an overview of the proposed smoke-free multiunit housing ordinance which was drafted with guidance from the smoke-free multiunit housing model ordinance Back to Outline
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026
PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8.70, SMOKEFREE MULTIUNIT HOUSING TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PICO RIVERA

MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)

prepared by the Public Health Law Center.

Exposure to secondhand smoke has been identified as a significant public health concern. In multi-unit housing environments, smoke can travel between units through shared walls, ventilation systems, windows, and other openings, impacting neighboring residents. The State of California has implemented various laws regulating smoking in workplaces and certain public areas; however, regulation of smoking in private multi-unit housing remains largely within the authority of local jurisdictions. In recent years, numerous cities throughout California have adopted ordinances restricting smoking in multi-unit housing to protect residents from involuntary exposure to secondhand smoke and to promote healthier living environments.

Discussion:

The proposed ordinance would establish Chapter 8.70 of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code to regulate smoking in multi-unit residential properties. Key provisions include:
• Prohibition of Smoking in Multi-Unit Residences: Smoking would be prohibited within all enclosed areas of multi-unit housing units, including apartments, condominiums, and common areas.
• Designation of Smoking Areas: Property owners may designate limited outdoor smoking areas, subject to location and distance requirements to minimize exposure to non-smokers.
• Disclosure Requirements: Landlords would be required to disclose the smoking policy to prospective and existing tenants.
• Signage Requirements: Property owners must post appropriate signage indicating smoking restrictions.
• Enforcement: Violations may be subject to administrative citations and fines consistent with the Municipal Code.
• Non-Criminal Enforcement: The ordinance is intended to be enforced through administrative mechanisms rather than criminal penalties.

The ordinance is designed to balance public health protections with reasonable accommodations for property owners and residents. Several cities within Los Angeles County including Bell Gardens, Beverly Hills, Calabasas, Culver City, El Monte, Huntington Park and Norwalk have enacted similar smoke-free multi-family housing regulations prohibiting smoking in private units, balconies, patios, and shared spaces.

According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), implementation of smokefree policies can result in substantial cost savings for multi-unit housing operators and society, including from reduced renovation expenses, fire-related losses, money CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026
PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8.70, SMOKEFREE MULTIUNIT HOUSING TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PICO RIVERA

MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)

spent on healthcare, and other expenses related to secondhand smoke. 1 The 2022-24 Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing Resident Public Opinion Survey collected responses from 478 adult residents from Pico Rivera. The survey, included as Enclosure 2, reported the following:
• 1 in 3 Pico Rivera residents surveyed are living in multi-unit housing (such as apartments, duplexes, condos, etc.).
• 2 in 5 reported being bothered by drifting secondhand smoke in their home in the past year.
• 94% would prefer to live in a completely smokefree multi-unit housing property. • 70% of households with someone who has a medical condition believe secondhand smoke worsens that condition.
• Pico Rivera housing stock is composed of 16.7% multifamily housing.

Environmental Analysis:

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and associated Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines), the City Council finds that there is no possibility that the project would have a significant effect on the environment and as a result, no further CEQA review is necessary. The determination is in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines which states, a project is exempt from CEQA where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing to Title 8, Health and Safety will have a significant effect on the environment.

Conclusion:

Staff recommends that the City Council introduce and waive the first reading of the ordinance adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing to Title 8, Health and Safety of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code. The ordinance will be brought for a second reading at the next available regularly scheduled City Council meeting and will become effective 30 days after adoption.

Steve Carmona
SC:AB:EF:jj:ca
1 CDC. (2024, May 15). Smokefree Policies Can Protect Everybody. Www.cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/secondhandsmoke/policy.html CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026
PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 8.70, SMOKEFREE MULTIUNIT HOUSING TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PICO RIVERA

MUNICIPAL CODE (FIRST READING AND INTRODUCTION)

Enclosure(s): 1) Ordinance
2) California Department of Public Health: 2022-2024 Survey Findings Pico Rivera
ORDINANCE NO. ____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 8.70, SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT
HOUSING TO TITLE 8, HEALTH AND SAFETY, OF THE PICO RIVERA

MUNICIPAL CODE
WHEREAS, the City of Pico Rivera (“City”), pursuant to the police powers delegated to it by the California Constitution, has the authority to enact laws within its boundaries which promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents, and are not in conflict with general laws; and
WHEREAS, periodic amendments to the Pico Rivera Municipal Code (PRMC) are necessary to ensure consistency with state laws and provide clarity to residents, businesses, and City staff; and
WHEREAS, the amendments to Titles 8 are intended to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its residents, including from avoidable environmental hazards such as secondhand smoke; and
WHEREAS, a survey conducted in Pico Rivera found that 94% of residents living in multi-unit housing would prefer to live in a completely smoke-free property1; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the matter of amendments of the Municipal Code at a legally noticed public hearing held on May 12, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera desires to amend the Pico Rivera Municipal Code as set forth herein.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The City Council for the City of Pico Rivera finds and declares the foregoing are true and correct and incorporates said recitals fully into this Ordinance as substantive findings.

SECTION 2. Amend Title 8, Health and Safety by adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing, and to read as follows:

Title 8 HEALTH AND SAFETY
Chapter 8.70 SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT HOUSING Sections

8.70.010 Purpose and Intent
1a
Back to Outline
ORDINANCE NO. ____

8.70.020 Definitions

8.70.030 Smoking Restrictions

8.70.040 Requirements for Rental Properties

8.70.050 Requirements for Common Interest Developments

8.70.060 Other

8.70.070 Penalties and Enforcement

8.70.010 Purpose and Intent
It is the purpose of this chapter to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the city by regulating the inherently dangerous behavior of smoking around nontobacco users, by protecting children from exposure to smoking where they live and play, and by protecting the public from nonconsensual exposure to secondhand smoke in and around their homes.

8.70.020 Definitions
Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the following words and terms as used in this Chapter shall have the following meanings:

A. “Common Area” means every area of a multiunit residence that residents of more than one unit are entitled to enter or use, including, but not limited to, halls, pathways, lobbies, courtyards, elevators, stairs, community rooms, playgrounds, gym facilities, swimming pools, parking garages, parking lots, grassy or landscaped areas, restrooms, laundry rooms, cooking areas, and eating areas.

B. “Common interest development” means:

1. A community apartment project as defined in California Civil Code section 4105, or any successor legislation;

2. A condominium project as defined in California Civil Code section 4125, or any successor legislation;

3. A planned development as defined in California Civil Code section 4175, or any successor legislation; and

4. A stock cooperative as defined in California Civil Code section 4190, or any successor legislation.

C. “Electronic smoking device” means any electronic and/or battery-operated device that may be used to deliver any aerosolized or vaporized substance to the person inhaling from the device, including, but not limited to, an e-cigarette, e-cigarillo, ecigar, e-pipe, vape pen, or e-hookah, or any other product name or descriptor.

D. “Enclosed area” means all space between a floor and a ceiling that is bounded by walls, doorways, or windows, whether open or closed, covering more than 50 percent of the combined surface area of the vertical planes constituting the ORDINANCE NO. ____

perimeter of the area. A wall includes any retractable divider, garage door, or other physical barrier, whether temporary or permanent.

E. “Home owners’ association” or “HOA” means an organization or entity established for the purpose of managing or maintaining a common interest development. A homeowners’ association shall also mean “association” as defined in California Civil Code section 4080, or any successor legislation.

F. “Landlord” means any person or agent of a person who owns, manages, or is otherwise legally responsible for a unit in a multiunit residence that is leased to a residential tenant. For purposes of this ordinance, a tenant who sublets their unit (e.g., a sublessor) is not a landlord.

G. “Multiunit Residence” means property containing two or more units, including, but not limited to, apartment buildings, common interest developments, senior and assisted living facilities, and long-term health care facilities. Multiunit Residences do not include the following:

1. a hotel or motel that meets the requirements of California Civil Code section 1940(b)(2);

2. a mobile home park;

3. a campground;

4. a single-family home, except if used as a health care facility subject to licensing requirements; and

5. a single-family home with an accessory dwelling unit or second unit permitted pursuant to Government Code Section 66310 through 66342 et seq., as may be amended.

H. “Nonsmoking Area” means any area in which smoking is prohibited by

1. This chapter or other law;

2. Binding agreement relating to the ownership, occupancy, or use of real property; or

3. A person with legal control over the area.

I. “Person” means any human, partnership, cooperative association, corporation, personal representative, receiver, trustee, assignee, or any other legal entity, including government agencies.

J. “Smoking” means:

ORDINANCE NO. ____

1. Inhaling, exhaling, or burning, any tobacco, nicotine, cannabis, or plant product, whether natural or synthetic;

2. carrying any lighted, heated, or activated tobacco, nicotine, marijuana, or plant product, whether natural or synthetic, intended for inhalation; or

3. using an “electronic smoking device.”
K. “Unit” means a personal dwelling space, even one lacking cooking facilities or private plumbing facilities, and includes any associated exclusive-use area, such as a private balcony, porch, deck, or patio. “Unit” includes, without limitation, an apartment; a condominium; a townhouse; a room in a senior facility; a room in a long-term health care facility, assisted living facility, community care facility, or hospital; a room in a hotel or motel; a dormitory room; a room in a single-room occupancy facility; a room in a homeless shelter; a mobile home; a camper vehicle or tent; a single-family home; and an accessory dwelling unit or second unit.

8.70.030 Smoking Restrictions
A. Effective six (6) months from the effective date of this ordinance, smoking is prohibited anywhere on the premises of a multiunit residence, including units, common areas, and other outdoor areas.

B. No person with legal control over any multiunit residence shall permit smoking anywhere on the premises of the multiunit residence. Notwithstanding subsection (A), smoking is permitted in designated smoking areas if they meet the following conditions;

1. Must not be an enclosed area;

2. Must be at least twenty-five (25) feet from any:
i. Dwelling unit;
ii. Indoor common area;
iii. Windows, doors, air conditioning unit, air intake, ventilation unit, or similar;
iv. Outdoor recreation area such as a tennis court, swimming pool, an picnic area; or
v. Outdoor area primarily used by children such as a playground and school bus stops;

3. Must have a clearly marked perimeter; and

4. Must be identified by conspicuous signs.

C. No person with legal control over any nonsmoking area of a multiunit residence shall permit smoking in the nonsmoking area, except as provided in subsection (B). No person with legal control over a common area in which smoking is ORDINANCE NO. ____

prohibited by this chapter or other law shall permit the presence of ashtrays, ashcans, or other receptacles designed for or primarily used for disposal of smoking waste within the area.

8.70.040 Requirements for Rental Properties.

The following requirements apply to multiunit residences other than units in a common interest development that are not being rented:

A. Within six (6) months from the effective date of this ordinance, every landlord shall deliver to each unit a copy of this chapter and a written notice clearly stating:

1. All units are designated nonsmoking units and smoking is prohibited in a unit, including any associated private balcony, porch, deck, or patio, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance; and

2. Smoking in all common areas or outdoor areas except for specifically designated smoking areas, is a violation of this chapter as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance.

B. As of six months from the effective date of this ordinance, every landlord shall provide prospective tenants with written notice clearly stating that:

1. Smoking is prohibited in units, including any associated private balcony, porch, deck, or patio, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance; and

2. Smoking is prohibited in all common areas and outdoor areas except for specifically designated smoking areas, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance.

C. As of six months from the effective date of this ordinance, the person or persons with legal control over common areas shall post and maintain clear and unambiguous “No Smoking” signs at entrances and exits, in common areas, and in conspicuous places adjoining the property grounds. In addition, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance, the person or persons with legal control over the multiunit residence shall post and maintain signs in sufficient numbers and locations in the multiunit residence to indicate that smoking is prohibited in all units. The absence of signs shall not be a defense to a violation of any provision of this chapter. “No Smoking” signs are not required inside or on doorways of units.

D. Landlords with knowledge of violations shall take reasonable steps to investigate and enforce the regulations, including a written notice to the resident of the landlord’s knowledge of the violation, a request to cease the violation, and the course of action to be taken if the violation is not corrected.

8.70.050 Requirements for Common Interest Developments.

ORDINANCE NO. ____

The following requirements apply to common interest developments:

A. Within six months from the effective date of this ordinance, the HOA shall provide to all owners of units a copy of this chapter and written notice clearly stating that:

1. Smoking is prohibited in units, including any associated private balcony, porch, deck, or patio, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance; and

2. Smoking is prohibited in all common areas and outdoor areas except for specifically designated smoking areas, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance.

B. As of six months from the effective date of this ordinance every seller of a unit shall provide prospective buyers or renters, a copy of this chapter and written notice clearly stating that:

1. Smoking is prohibited in units, including any associated private balcony, porch, deck, or patio, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance; and

2. Smoking is prohibited in all common areas and outdoor areas except for specifically designated smoking areas, as of six months from the effective date of this ordinance.

C. As of six months from the effective date of this ordinance, the HOA, or any person having legal ownership or control over common areas, shall post and maintain clear and unambiguous “No Smoking” signs in sufficient numbers and locations in the common interest development to make it obvious to a reasonable person that smoking is prohibited throughout the common interest development. The absence of signs shall not be a defense to a violation of any provision of this chapter.

D. HOAs with knowledge of violations shall take reasonable steps to investigate and enforce the regulations, including a written notice to the resident of the HOA’s knowledge of the violation, a request to cease the violation, and the course of action to be taken if the violation is not corrected.

8.70.060 Other
A. The provisions of this chapter shall be liberally construed to protect the public health to the maximum effect possible. Notwithstanding (1) any provision of this chapter or of this code, (2) any failure by any person to restrict smoking under this chapter, or (3) any explicit or implicit provision of this code that allows smoking in any place, nothing in this code shall be interpreted to limit any person’s legal rights under other laws with regard to smoking, including rights in nuisance, trespass, property damage, and personal injury or other legal or equitable principles.

ORDINANCE NO. ____

8.70.070 Penalties and Enforcement
The remedies provided by this chapter are cumulative and in addition to any other remedies available at law or in equity.

A. Any person exposed to secondhand smoke as a result of a violation of this chapter may initiate enforcement of this chapter by registering a complaint with the Community and Economic Development Director, or his or her designee.

B. Enforcement of this chapter shall be the responsibility of the Community and Economic Development Director and Code Enforcement Division.

C. Landlords or HOAs found to have violated this chapter are subject to a civil fine in the following amounts:
a. Two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) for a first violation; b. Five hundred dollars ($500) for a second violation; and c. One thousand dollars ($1,000) for a third violation.

D. No person shall intimidate, harass, or otherwise retaliate against any person who seeks compliance with this chapter. Any person in violation of this subsection is subject to a civil fine not less than $500 per violation.

SECTION 3. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and associated Guidelines (“CEQA Guidelines”), the City Council finds that there is no possibility that the project would have a significant effect on the environment and as a result, no further CEQA review is necessary. The determination is in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines which states, a project is exempt from CEQA where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adding Chapter 8.70, Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing to Title 8, Health and Safety will have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 4. Any provision of the City of Pico Rivera’s Municipal Code inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of such inconsistency and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to the extent necessary to affect the provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby finds and determines that there are no newspapers of general circulation both published and circulated within the City and, in compliance with Section 36933 of the Government Code, directs the City Clerk to cause said Ordinance, within fifteen (15) days after its passage, to be posted in at least five (5) public places within the City. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

ORDINANCE NO. ____

ADOPTED AND PASSED this ____ day of ______, 2026.

Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) §

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
I, Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk of the City of Pico Rivera, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. ____ was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera, held on ___________________, with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk

PICO RIVERA

ATTITUDES TOWARDS SMOKING AND VAPING IN

MULTI-UNIT HOUSING
A survey conducted in Pico Rivera
reveals that residents view smoking and
vaping in their community as a threat to
their health and would be willing to
support local policies that reduce
exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS)
and vape aerosols in multi-unit housing.
2022-24 SURVEY FINDINGS
1 in 3
Pico Rivera residents surveyed
are living in multi-unit housing
(such as apartments, duplexes,
condos, etc.).

According to Pico Rivera residents living in multi-unit housing… 54%
From another unit (through vents, cracks, outlets, etc.) From another unit’s outdoor balcony or patio
Nearby indoor common area (hallways, lobby, etc.)
65%
39%
By source of SHS
reported being bothered
by drifting secondhand
smoke in their home in the
past year.
2 in5 70%
who live with
someone with a
medical condition
believes that their
condition is worse
with SHS exposure.
94%
would prefer to live
in a completely
smokefree multiunit housing
property.

Nearby outdoor common area (stairwells, pool area, etc.) 50%
Enclosure 2
1b

SUPPORT FOR SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT HOUSING POLICIES
There is strong public support among all Pico Rivera
residents who want the following multi-unit
housing areas to be 100% smokefree:

Indoor private
apartment units
Outdoor
private spaces
(such as balconies
and patios)
Indoor common areas
(such as laundry rooms, hallways,
stairways, lobbies, recreation
rooms, etc.)
All units in multi-unit housing (including condos and
apartment complexes) should be required to be smoke and vape-free.

Outdoor common areas
(such as courtyards, play areas,
and swimming pools)
For more information,
please contact:

Antonio Salang
Institute for Public Strategies
(310) 215-9924 ext. 143
[email protected]
The Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing Resident
Public Opinion Survey followed a comprehensive
protocol developed by the Los Angeles County
Department of Public Health Tobacco Control
and Prevention Program. This survey report
represents results based on surveys collected in
Pico Rivera, California by trained staff from the
Institute for Public Strategies. The survey assessed
respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, and
perceptions regarding the impact of tobacco in
their community.

Participants were surveyed at public places that
included, but were not limited to: community
events, libraries, grocery stores, pharmacies,
farmers markets, and other public locations.

Survey responses were collected from 478 adult
residents from Pico Rivera, representing persons
of varied sex, age groups, racial/ethnic groups,
and tobacco use status between November 1,
2022 through February 29, 2024. The survey is
based on a convenience sample of Pico Rivera
residents and may not reflect the views of all
residents.

Survey Overview
© 2024. California Department of Public Health. Funded under contract # CTCP-21-19. 90%
72%
95%
90%
Source: 2022-24 Smokefree Multi-Unit Housing Resident Public Opinion Survey. Tobacco Control and Prevention Program, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. 7% 8% 37% 47%
1%
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Neutral Strongly Agree Tuesday, April 28, 2026
A regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chamber, Pico Rivera City Hall, 6615 Passons Boulevard, Pico Rivera, California.

Mayor Camacho called the regular meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. on behalf of the City Council.

PRESENT: Camacho, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Garcia
ABSENT: None
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
• Jorge Flores, Parks and Recreation Commission
• Aldo Macias Arellano, Sister City Commission
INVOCATION: Delivered by Councilmember Garcia
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Anthony Estrada, 6th grade student from North Park Middle School
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
• Certificates of Recognition were presented to the Pico Rivera Dons Junior Gremlin, Gremlin, and Junior Midget cheer teams for an outstanding 2025 season. • Presentation – Platinum Energy Action Award
Hector De La Torre, Executive Director of the Gateway Cities Council of Governments, presented the City of Pico Rivera and the Office of Sustainability with the Platinum Energy Action award.

PUBLIC HEARING:

City Council:

1. Public Hearing – Resolution Amending the Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2026-27. (700)
Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Back to Outline 2
4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to a public hearing and approve a resolution amending the Fee Schedule for fiscal year 2026-27. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Resolution No. 7466 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 7398 AND AMENDING THE USER FEES, CHARGES, AND SERVICES
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None

2. Public Hearing – Approval of Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Action Plan. (1600)
Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez to: 1) Approve Resolution No. 7467 authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit the Community Development Block Grant fiscal year (FY) 2026–27 Annual Action Plan to the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development; 2) Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary agreements and certifications related to the implementation of CDBG-funded programs and projects; and 3) Approve Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement No. 24-2347 with Avant-Garde, Inc. for CDBG program administration services, for the third and final term, in an amount not to exceed $88,250, and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the amendment.

Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Resolution No. 7467 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FY 2026-2027 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Agreement No. 24-2347-2
AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None

3. Public Hearing – Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 24-2367 with Atlas Planning Solutions to Update the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Emergency Operation Plan, and General Plan Safety Element. (500)
Mayor Camacho opened the public hearing and noted that there were no oral or written communication to provide public testimony.
4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Mayor Camacho closed the public hearing.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to: 1) Conduct a public hearing and approve Amendment No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement No. 24-2367 with Atlas Planning Solutions (Atlas) to extend the term of the Agreement to July 31, 2026; and 2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in a form approved by the City Attorney. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Agreement No. 24-2367-1
AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS:

Joe Sanchez:
• Addressed the City Council regarding concerns related to the upcoming Gateway Cities Fiber Optic Project and urged greater transparency to ensure residents are informed of all projects within the City limits, including those led by county, state, or federal agencies.

Lauren Talbott:
• Addressed the City Council regarding upcoming library updates for the month of May.

Tony Islas:
• Addressed the City Council to express appreciation for the recognition of the Dons cheer teams and to request assistance in providing equipment for the teams and identifying indoor facility options, allowing the teams to practice in a safe and comfortable environment during late evenings and inclement weather conditions.

Cecilia Islas:
• Addressed the City Council to express appreciation for the recognition of the Dons cheer teams and to request assistance in identifying indoor facility options, allowing the teams to practice in a safe and comfortable environment during late evenings and inclement weather conditions.

Jonathan Greyson, Helpline Youth Counseling:
• Addressed the City Council regarding the smoke shop project campaign and requested the City’s collaboration with the committee to further advance the campaign efforts.

Luisana Delgado:
• Addressed the City Council in support of preserving the handball courts and mural at Rio Hondo Park as part of the upcoming park renovation project.

Written communication was received by the following:
4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Amy Powell:
• Addressed the City Council to express concerns regarding the growing feral cat population in the city.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS:

City Council:

4. Minutes:
• Approved City Council regular meeting of April 14, 2026 • Received and filed Sister City Commission regular meeting February 18, 2026; March 18, 2026

5. Approved 15th Warrant Register of the 2025-2026 Fiscal Year. (700) Check Numbers: 300388-300472
Special Check Numbers: 19585, 19632

6. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinances Amending Chapter 3.20 Purchasing and Amending Chapter 3.48 Alternative Bidding Procedures for Public Projects of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code. (700)

1. Adopted Ordinance No. 1206 amending Chapter 3.20, Purchasing, of the Pico Rivera Municipal Code (PRMC); and

2. Adopted Ordinance No. 1207 amending Chapter 3.48 Alternative Bidding Procedures for Public Projects of the PRMC.

Ordinance No. 1206 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.20,

PURCHASING, OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE (SECOND

READING AND ADOPTION)
Ordinance No. 1207 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.48

ALTERNATIVE BIDDING PROCEDURES FOR PUBLIC PROJECTS
(INFORMAL BIDDING) OF THE PICO RIVERA MUNICIPAL CODE
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)

7. Resolution Updating Job Descriptions for the Full-Time Counter Services Representative Positions for the Public Works and Community and Economic Development Departments. (200)

1. Approved Resolution No. 7468 updating job descriptions for the full-time Counter Services Representative in Public Works and Community and Economic Development Department.

Resolution No. 7468 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, UPDATING JOB DESCRIPTIONS

FOR THE FULL-TIME POSITIONS OF COUNTER SERVICES

REPRESENTATIVE (PUBLIC WORKS) AND COUNTER SERVICES

REPRESENTATIVE (COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

8. Amendment No. 1 to Agreement 26-2531 with Restoration Management Company for Parks and Recreation Building Water Damage Restoration. (500)

1. Approved Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 26-2531 with Restoration Management Company for the water damage repair and office management and logistics for Parks and Recreation building caused by water damage in the amount of $165,108;

2. Authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 in a form approved by the City Attorney; and

3. Approved an appropriation of $165,108 from the Liability Claims Fund.

Agreement No. 26-2531-1

9. Exchange Agreement with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. (500)

1. Approved Exchange Agreement and Assignment of Federal Surface Transportation Program-Local (STP-L) Funds with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) in the amount of $186,322 as part of Metro’s STP-L Exchange Program from federal funds to state funds;

2. Authorized the City Manager to execute the Exchange Agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney;

3. Accepted exchanged STP-L funds in the amount of $186,322 from Metro’s Exchange STP-L Exchange Program and approve an adjustment to the fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 State Grant revenue budget by $186,322; and

4. Approved an adjustment to the FY 2025-26 State Grant expenditure budget by appropriating $186,322 in the Contract Service account.

Agreement No. 26-2541

10. Third Quarter Treasurer’s Report and the Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of March 31, 2026 – Fiscal Year 2025-26. (700)

1. Received and filed the Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending March 31, 2026, which represents balances and activities for the third quarter (January through March) of the 2025-26 fiscal year; and

2. Received and filed the Treasurer’s Monthly Investment Transaction Report as of March 31, 2026.

11. 2026 Fireworks Stand Permits. (700)

1. Approved the attached list of fireworks stand applications and authorized the issuance of permits to operate.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Lara to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 4 through 11. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION: None 4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

REGULAR AGENDA:

City Council:

12. Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 - Annual Renewal Consideration. (700)
Motion by Councilmember Lara, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to: 1) Approve Resolution No. 7469 initiating the fiscal year (FY) 2026-27, Levy of Annual Assessment and ordering the preparation of the Engineer’s Report for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1; 2) Approve Resolution No. 7470 preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for the FY 2026-27 levy and collection of assessments within the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and 3) Approve Resolution No. 7471 declaring the City Council’s intention to levy and collect the annual assessment within the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 for FY 2026-27, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, and setting June 9, 2026, as the date for the public hearing of objections thereto. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Resolution No. 7469 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR

ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR PICO RIVERA LANDSCAPE
AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR
2026-2027 AND ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF AN ENGINEER’S

REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CALIFORNIA
STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE DIVISION 15, PART 2
Resolution No. 7470 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT REGARDING PICO RIVERA LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1, AND

THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS RELATED
THERETO FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
Resolution No. 7471 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER’S

REPORT AND DECLARING INTENTION TO LEVY ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027, PICO RIVERA
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None

13. Paramount Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment – Annual Renewal Consideration. (700)
4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

Motion by Councilmember Lara, seconded by Councilmember Lutz to: 1) Approve Resolution No. 7472 initiating the fiscal year (FY) 2026-27 Levy of Annual Assessment and ordering the preparation of the Engineer’s Report for the Paramount Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment District; 2) Approve Resolution No. 7473 preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report for the FY 2026-27, levy, and collection of assessments within the Paramount Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment District pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and 3) Approve Resolution No. 7474 declaring the City Council’s intention to levy and collect the annual assessment within the Paramount Mines Landscape Maintenance Assessment District for FY 2026- 27, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15, of the California Streets and Highways Code, and setting June 9, 2026, as the date for the public hearing to consider objections thereto. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

Resolution No. 7472 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING THE
PREPARATION OF THE ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR THE

PARAMOUNT/MINES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT

DISTRICT
Resolution No. 7473 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT REGARDING THE

PARAMOUNT/MINES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT, AND

THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS RELATED
THERETO FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
Resolution No. 7474 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PICO RIVERA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO

LEVY AND COLLECT THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE

PARAMOUNT/MINES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, PART 2 OF DIVISION 15,

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, AND

SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE HEARING ON OBJECTIONS

THERETO
AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None

14. Pico Rivera World Spirit Festival Plan and Budget Related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup. (700)
Innovation and Communications Director Hernandez delivered a brief presentation highlighting the upcoming World Spirit Festival, scheduled for June 26–27, 2026. The event will serve as an unofficial FIFA 2026 fan zone and will be free to the community. 4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

If approved, promotional outreach efforts will commence immediately. The two-day festival will take place at two locations within the City and will feature street concerts, soccer clinics and tournaments, carnival rides and games, a vendor village, food and beverage areas, a children’s activity zone, watch parties, a car show, and a 5K run and walk.

Mayor and City Council expressed their support for, and enthusiasm regarding, the event.

Motion by Councilmember Lutz, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to: 1) Approve a maximum not-to-exceed total event budget of $877,000 for the Pico Rivera World Spirit Festival (Non-CIP No. 1889), scheduled for June 26–27, 2026, in conjunction with the 2026 FIFA World Cup; 2) Approve a budget amendment to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Budget by reducing $152,473 from the General Fund (GF) Innovation & Communication budget and $214,527 from the GF City Manager budget, transferring the funds to the Community Benefit Fund, and appropriating the funds to the World Spirit Festival; 3) Approve a budget amendment to the FY 2025-26 Budget by reducing $50,000 from the PRIME Fund budget, transferring the funds to the Community Benefit Fund, and appropriating the funds to the World Spirit Festival; and 4) Approve an appropriation of $82,000 from the Community Benefit Fund toward Non-CIP No. 1889. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

AYES: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
NOES: None
CITY MANAGER/STAFF REPORTS: None
GOOD OF THE ORDER (INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGENCY MEETINGS, AB 1234) Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez highlighted the City’s recent Earth Day event and recognized the winners of the trash truck art initiative.

Mayor Camacho reported on his recent appointment to the Metrolink Board of Directors and his facilitation of a WELL Watershed Learning Lab through Water Education for Latino Leaders.

Recessed to Closed Session at 7:27 p.m.

ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT
Reconvened from Closed Session at 8:16 p.m.

ALL CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT
CLOSED SESSION(S):
4-28-26.CityCouncilMinutes

a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
Pursuant to Government Code Section 549569(d)(1)
City of Pico Rivera v. Super Lodging Services, LLC, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 26STCV11523
City Attorney Alvarez-Glasman stated that information was presented to City Council; no further action was taken and there was nothing further to report.

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Camacho adjourned the City Council regular meeting at 8:17 p.m. in memory of Luis Galiana, father of Finance Supervisor Isabel Sosa; Isaias Osama Faccuseh Hernandez, son of Community and Economic Development Senior Analyst Jazmin Faccuseh; and Jose Manuel Rodriguez, father of Public Works Facility Maintenance Worker Darrell Rodriguez. There being no objection it was so ordered.

PRESENT: Camacho, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Garcia
ABSENT: None
_______________________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct report of the proceedings of the City Council regular meeting dated April 28, 2026, and approved by the City Council on May 12, 2026.
________________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
A Special Meeting of the City Council was held in the Council Chamber, Pico Rivera City Hall, 6615 Passons Boulevard, Pico Rivera, California.

Mayor Camacho called the special meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. on behalf of the City Council.

PRESENT: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
ABSENT: None
* Councilmember Lutz arrived at 4 :24 p.m.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
REGULAR AGENDA:

City Council:

1. Year Two of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program – Fiscal Years 2026 Through 2030. (700)
Public Works Director Negrete provided a comprehensive presentation highlighting completed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for Fiscal Year 2025–2026, including the completion of Alebrije Dog Park and the City Hall Council Chambers. He also outlined projects currently under construction, including various street improvement projects, the citywide Pavement Management Program, the Smith Park Aquatic Center, gym HVAC improvements at Rivera and Pico Parks, the Rio Hondo Park renovation, water-related projects such as Water Well destruction and PFAS treatment at Plant No. 3, traffic safety initiatives, school crossing safety enhancements, and storm drain improvements.

Additionally, Director Negrete provided an overview of the five-year CIP funding by source, noting that $208.8 million in projects is funded, with only $13.8 million currently unfunded.

City Council discussed potential partnerships with local educational institutions, including Rio Hondo College and El Rancho High School, for shared facility use. Additional discussion included future follow-up regarding street repairs on Friendship Avenue and Amistad Avenue, as well as continuing the practice of posting project notices at construction sites with the addition of QR codes to provide residents with easier access to project information.

City Council also suggested that staff explore obtaining a quote for the full repaving of Burke Street, including the surrounding cul-de-sacs. Additional recommendations Back to Outline 2a
05-5-26.SpecialCityCouncilMinutes

included incorporating colorful and artistic elements into future crosswalk projects in the uptown district, evaluating street-level lighting options, pursuing potential grant funding opportunities for traffic signal installations near local fire stations, seeking sponsorships and/or grants for batting cage improvements, reinstalling stolen up lights at the City entry signs citywide, publishing completed project information on the City’s website for public viewing, a City entry arch on Whittier Boulevard for individuals entering the City westbound and ensuring future batting cage improvements accommodate youth softball players.

Regarding the City entry arch on Whittier Boulevard, City Manager Carmona stated that two ongoing projects may incorporate such enhancements: the Pio Pico Connector Project led by Southern California Association of Governments and the Citywide Regional Trail Entrances and City Entry Points Safety Improvements Project.

City Council also directed staff to identify funding sources to fully complete the renovation of the Historical Museum and elevate the project’s priority ranking. Additional direction included increasing the priority of the Rivera Park Batting Cage Renovation Project and adding or elevating the priority of the Pico Boys Relocation Project on the unfunded project list.

City Council expressed their appreciation to city staff for their continued hard work and dedication to the community.

Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Dr. Sanchez, seconded by Councilmember Garcia to: 1) Receive and file the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget study for fiscal years 2026 through 2030 (FY 2026-30); and 2) Provide staff direction on the CIP budget for FY 2026-30. Motion carries by the following roll call vote:

PRESENT: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
ABSENT: None
ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Camacho adjourned the City Council special meeting at 5:46 p.m. There being no objection it was so ordered.

PRESENT: Garcia, Lara, Lutz, Sanchez, Camacho
ABSENT: None

_____________________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
05-5-26.SpecialCityCouncilMinutes

Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct report of the proceedings of the City Council special meeting dated May 5, 2026, and approved by the City Council on May 12, 2026.
________________________________
Cynthia Ayala, CMC, City Clerk
MEETING DATE: 05/12/26

CHECK DATE STARTING ENDING AMOUNT
CHECK NUMBERS: 4/17/26-4/30/26 300473 300616 $578,971.09 ACH NUMBERS: 4/17/26-4/30/26 19854 19934 $532,993.65
PRE-NOTE: 19889
TOTAL REGISTER AMOUNT: $ 1,111,964.74
16th WARRANT REGISTER OF THE 2025 - 2026 FISCAL YEAR
SPECIAL CHECKS/EFT:

VOIDED CHECKS:
3 Back to Outline
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
300473 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $9,000.00 Invoice Amount
PI-2585448,5449 $9,000.00
300474 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $473.33
Invoice Amount
PI-2595541 $473.33
300475 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $75.00
Invoice Amount
COMSTP041526-AM $75.00
300476 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $150.00
Invoice Amount
COMSTP031826-AA $75.00
COMSTP041526-AA $75.00
300477 04/22/2026 04/24/2026 Accounts Payable $2,500.00 Invoice Description Amount
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 03/18/26
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 04/15/26

BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 04/15/26

ASCENCIO, ANA ROSA
Description
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
REFUND FOR CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT, 8500 WASHINGTON

ARELLANO, ALDO, MACIAS
Description
REFUND FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPOSIT, 5017& 5021 CHURCH ST

ALLSTORE BUILDERS CORP
Description
CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating
Check
5017 CHURCH LLC
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 1 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
262364 $2,500.00
300478 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $317.18
Invoice Amount
06D8710104659 $317.18
300479 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $1,600.00 Invoice Amount
RSP-2579743-5215 $1,600.00
300480 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $1,550.50 Invoice Amount
7098-49253 $1,550.50
300481 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $317.53
Invoice Amount
PI-26103372 $317.53
300482 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $150.00
Invoice Amount
COMSTP031826-FC $75.00
Description
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 03/18/26
Description
REFUND FOR CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT, 9844 SHADE LN

CENTENO, FERNANDO
Description

STEEL DOOR DRAIN COVER FOR DOG PARK
CALI #1 ROOFING
Description

REFUND FOR CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT, VARIOUS LOCATION
C & O Manufacturing
Description
WATER SVC FOR CITY HALL WEST, 03/11/26-04/10/26
BRIGHT PLANET SOLAR INC.

PROFESSIONAL SVCS FOR 4/7/26 PERIOD, 5201 PARAMOUNT BL
BLUETRITON BRANDS INC.
user: April Zamora Pages: 2 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
COMSTP041526-FC $75.00
300483 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $368.16
Invoice Amount
RIV-MAR26 $368.16
300484 04/22/2026 05/01/2026 Accounts Payable $249.00
Invoice Amount
117807 $249.00
300485 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $10,001.25 Invoice Amount
L261191444 $10,001.25
300486 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $75,632.07 Invoice Amount
22007-16 $75,632.07
300487 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $1,648.50 Invoice Amount
EM067892 $270.00
Coastal Occupational Medical Group
Description
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS JANUARY 2026
CNS Engineers, Inc.

Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 1/1/26-4/3/26, WASHINGTON BL OVER RIO HONDO CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Description
SINGLE AUDIT FOR FY 2024-25
Certifix Live Scan
Description

ROLLING FEES
Central Basin Municipal Water District
Description
RECYCLED WATER TIER 1 FOR FEBRUARY 2026
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 04/15/26
user: April Zamora Pages: 3 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
EM066394 $250.50
EM076149 $1,128.00
300488 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $7,103.81 Invoice Amount
RE-PW26040605700 $7,103.81
300489 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $19,256.00 Invoice Amount
25-067-4 $19,256.00
300490 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $3,236.40
Invoice Amount
062726-TICKETS-D $3,236.40
300491 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $12,724.86
Invoice Amount
3800120960 $251.62
3800121750 $5,130.00
3800121111 $251.62
3800122060 $5,130.00

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Description

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Description
ADMISSION TICKETS TO DODGERS GAME, 6/27/26

EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL, LLC
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26, REGIONAL TRAIL ENTRANCES Dodger Tickets, LLC
Description
IW THROUGH MARCH 2026
CRAFTWATER ENGINEERING, INC.

FIRST AID SVCS 12/10/25
PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS MARCH 2026
County of Los Angeles Dept of Public Works
user: April Zamora Pages: 4 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
3800122062 $1,710.00
3800120959 $251.62
300492 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $1,246.03 Invoice Amount
29582545 $101.33
29720951 $1,144.70
300493 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $515.62
Invoice Amount
29591361 $515.62
300494 04/22/2026 04/27/2026 Accounts Payable $5,703.39 Invoice Amount
0072316-1 $230.36
0073389 $3,707.91
0072363 $230.36
6021506 $285.00
6089974 $96.02
6111105 $392.23
6126125 $761.51

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc

IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES FOR PARKS

IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES FOR PARKS
Ewing Irrigation Products Inc

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
Ewing Irrigation Products Inc
Description

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
user: April Zamora Pages: 5 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300495 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $10.00
Invoice Amount
870069 $10.00
300496 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $317.95
Invoice Amount
034400968 $158.98
034381253 $158.97
300497 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $6,960.64
Invoice Amount
1236 $6,960.64
300498 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $9,645.00
Invoice Amount
45077 $9,645.00
300499 04/22/2026 04/27/2026 Accounts Payable $45,859.67 Invoice Amount
1200812993 $45,859.67
HDR Engineering, Inc
Description
PROF SVCS FROM 02/22/26-03/28/26, ROSEMEAD/LAKEWOOD BL CORRIDOR GM Sager Construction Co., Inc.

Description
ASPHALT REPAIRS AT PLANT 2, 8316 WASHINGTON BL

GLOBAL EVENT STRUCTURES, LLC
Description
CANOPY RENTAL FOR MEMORIAL DAY EVENT ON MAY 25,2026
Description

ALEXANDER ANGEL'S UNIFORM PANTS

ALEXANDER ANGEL'S UNIFORM POLOS
Description

REFUND FOR SOUTHEAST LA SENIOR BALL FOR JORGE GRAJEDA
Galls Parent Holdings, LLC

FERNANDEZ, AVELINA
user: April Zamora Pages: 6 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300500 04/22/2026 04/27/2026 Accounts Payable $400.00
Invoice Amount
RSP-2586690 $400.00
300501 04/22/2026 04/24/2026 Accounts Payable $1,400.00 Invoice Amount
066 $1,400.00
300502 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $631.01
Invoice Amount
13334 $590.03
13336 $40.98
300503 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $6,807.50
Invoice Amount
5268 $6,807.50
300504 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $2,437.00
Invoice Amount
BI 15352 PROFESSIONAL SVCS FEBRUARY 2026, BUILDING OFFICIAL $500.00 GIS COORDINATION SVCS, MARCH 2026
Jas Pacific, Inc.

Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WASH RACK AWNING
Infinity Technologies
Description
Industrial Pipe & Steel Company
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WASH RACK AWNING
HUDSON, KENNETH, A.

Description
LIVE PERFORMANCE FOR PR SENIOR CENTER, 04/23/26

HOMELINK SOLAR
Description
REFUND FOR CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT, 8709 RAILTON
user: April Zamora Pages: 7 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
PC8025 $1,937.00
300505 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $1,811.65 Invoice Amount
133600 $1,270.75
133642 $540.90
300506 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,250.00 Invoice Amount
336657 $1,250.00
300507 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,469.40 Invoice Amount
146777-146785 $1,469.40
300508 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $977.98
Invoice Amount
21065 $977.98
300509 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $1,748.47
Invoice Amount
L. A. Pressure Supply LLC
Description
L. A. Pressure Supply LLC
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR PARK MAINTENANCE

KIDZ TALENT ACADEMY LLC
Description
GYMNASTICS, TUMBLING AND CHEER CLASSES 4/4/26-4/25/26
Keenan & Associates
Description
BENEFIT BRIDGE FEE APRIL 2026, INSTALLMENT 10
Description

TEMPORARY NO PARKING SIGNS FOR WATER DIVISION

STREET SIGN & TRAFFIC MATERIALS FOR STREET DIVISION
PROFESSIONAL SVCS FEBRUARY 2026- 9140 WHITTIER, 8508 ARRINGTON JCL Traffic Services
user: April Zamora Pages: 8 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
21081 $1,657.86
21069 $90.61
300510 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $533.50
Invoice Amount
320231 $533.50
300511 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $4,500.00
Invoice Amount
PI-2590267,0270 $4,500.00
300512 04/22/2026 04/27/2026 Accounts Payable $1,503.97 Invoice Amount
62063394 $1,503.97
300513 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $8.00
Invoice Amount
870398 $8.00
300514 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $3,710.00
Invoice Amount

REFUND FOR SPRINGTIME SOIREE DANCE FOR ALBERT MERLANO
Milagro Media Strategies
Description

PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES

MERLANO, VICTORIA
Description
REFUND FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPOSIT, 5377 1/2 MANZANAR
McMaster-Carr Supply Company
Description

LEGAL COUNSEL SERVICES

MAGALLANES, PEDRO
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
user: April Zamora Pages: 9 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
2058 $3,710.00
300515 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $450.67
Invoice Amount
84875 $126.24
84786 $324.43
300516 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $3,800.00 Invoice Amount
2026-9819653-01 $3,800.00
300517 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $46.62
Invoice Amount
56519 $46.62
300518 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $300.00
Invoice Amount
60231 $300.00
300519 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $743.49
Invoice Description Amount
Description
MONTHLY ADMINISTRATION FEE FOR SVCS PERIOD 02/28/26
Parts Authority LLC
Description
STANDING LINEN ORDER 4/14/26
PARS
Description
SB 90/STATE MANDATED COST CONSULTING SVC ENDING 06/30/26 Orbit Party Rentals
WEEKLY ENROLLMENT NOTICES, 04/08 & 04/15

SIGNS, FLYERS, AND HANDOUTS
Nichols Consulting
STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION, MEDIA RELATIONS FOR MARCH 2026 Minuteman Press
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 10 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
062-274642 $148.59
065-654522 $334.75
110-927354 $137.05
101-995105 $123.10
300520 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $150.00
Invoice Amount
COMSTP031826-RP $75.00
COMSTP041526-RP $75.00
300521 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $24,529.37 Invoice Amount
2026FEBPICOWD-B $14,479.06
2026FEB-PICOWD-A $10,050.31
300522 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $6,000.00 Invoice Amount
26-003 $6,000.00
300523 04/22/2026 04/27/2026 Accounts Payable $480.00
Invoice Amount
CONSULTING SVCS FOR MARCH 2026

PORTILLO, EMILY
Description
UTILITIES FOR 02/12/26-03/16/26
PM Law Enforcement Services, LLC
Description
Pico Water District
Description
UTILITIES FOR 02/12/26-03/16/26
Description
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 03/18/26
COMMISSIONER STIPEND FOR MEETING 04/15/26

MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES

MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES

PEREZ, ROBERT

MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES

MECHANIC SHOP SUPPLIES
user: April Zamora Pages: 11 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
146732-146734 $480.00
300524 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $1,500.00
Invoice Amount
0000011 $1,500.00
300525 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $1,659.49 Invoice Amount
2-2604Uprs $873.72
11-2503Uprs $785.77
300526 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $410.00
Invoice Amount
2026-146 $300.00
2026-148 $110.00
300527 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $7,200.00 Invoice Amount
156 $7,200.00
300528 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable ROAD SOUP OF CALIFORNIA $2,584.20

RIVERA ELECTRIC LLC
Description
PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS- PLANT #1
Description
PLAYPASS VOUCHERS FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 2026
PLAYPASS VOUCHERS FOR YOUTH PARTICIPANTS 2026 CALENDAR YEAR UTILITIES SAVINGS DECEMBER 25-FEBRUARY 26
UTILITIES SAVING 09/01/25-11/30/25
Rivera Baseball Association Inc

PR SELF DEFENSE CLASS
Procure America, Inc
Description
BALLROOM ROOM DANCING AND SWING CLASSES, 1/6/25-2/10/25

PRETTY HANDS, HARD PUNCHES LLC
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 12 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
Invoice Amount
INV-000630 $2,584.20
300529 04/22/2026 05/01/2026 Accounts Payable $525.00
Invoice Amount
4392 $25.00
4444 $50.00
4528 $25.00
4489 $30.00
4487 $30.00
3118 $240.00
4387 $100.00
4038 $25.00
300530 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $11,191.20 Invoice Amount
7112714-7113397 $11,191.20
300531 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $400.00
Invoice Amount
RSP-26105649 REFUND FOR CANCELLED BUILDING PERMIT, 6402 BOLLENBACHER DR $400.00 WILD ANIMAL PARK TICKETS FOR MAY 30, 2026, OUTDOOR EQUITY GRANT

SOLARIS, SEMPER
Description
TIRE REPAIR FOR UNIT #127

SAN DIEGO ZOO WILDLIFE ALLIANCE
Description
TIRE ROTATION FOR UNIT 209

TIRE MOUNT FOR CITY FLEET

TIRE MOUNT FOR CITY FLEET
TIRE MOUNT FOR UNIT 299
TIRE REPAIR FOR UNIT 405
TIRE REPAIR FOR UNIT 286
Salgado Tire Service
Description
TIRE REPAIR FOR UNIT 454
Description

ASPHALT FOR STREET MAINTENANCE
user: April Zamora Pages: 13 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300532 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $500.00
Invoice Amount
5011 $500.00
300533 04/22/2026 05/01/2026 Accounts Payable $1,121.25 Invoice Amount
040726PICOSEN-Q1 $1,121.25
300534 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $36,050.00 Invoice Amount
82594 $18,400.00
82305 $17,650.00
300535 04/22/2026 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $4,000.00 Invoice Amount
FAUD-00005278 $4,000.00
300536 04/22/2026 04/27/2026 Accounts Payable $660.00
Invoice Amount
52568424 $660.00
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/27/26, PR WM REPLACEMENT
Description
ANNUAL STREET REPORT FY 2024-25, 07/01/25-06/30/26
Tetra Tech, Inc
SECURITY SERVICE, 03/16/26-03/31/26
SECURITY SERVICE, 02/16/26-03/01/26
State Controller's Office
Q1-2026 CLASS INSURANCE REPORT
SOUTHWEST PATROL, INC.

Description
BAND PERFORMANCE AT FARMER'S MARKET, 5/20/26
Southern California Municipal Athletic Federation
Description
SOTO JR., DAVID
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 14 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300537 04/22/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $2,870.00 Invoice Amount
1489 $1,332.50
1488 $1,537.50
300538 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $3,840.00
Invoice Amount
2026042014 $3,840.00
300539 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $500.00
Invoice Amount
5010 $500.00
300540 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $500.00
Invoice Amount
5011 $500.00
300541 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $476.29
Invoice Amount
2190493375 $476.29

UNIFIRST CORPORATION
Description

UNIFORM RENTAL SVCS

TULLIO, ROBERT
Description
BAND PERFORMANCE AT FARMER'S MARKET, 5/20/26

TULLIO, JIM
Description
PERFORMANCE AT PR FARMERS MARKET-05/20/26
Travelbank
Description
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION-EXPENSE MANG 40 USERS 06/01/26-05/31/27 Description
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN 3/3/26-3/24/26
PROF SVCS-CSAP PROJECT, 03/02/26-04/01/26

TKM ENGINEERING
user: April Zamora Pages: 15 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300542 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $7,500.00
Invoice Amount
2024-00001173 $7,500.00
300543 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $4,555.73
Invoice Amount
51172-A $4,555.73
300544 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $884.00
Invoice Amount
242484 $884.00
300545 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $713.77
Invoice Amount
940357 $713.77
300546 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $719.78
Invoice Amount
939936 $719.78
West Coast Sand & Gravel, Inc.

Description

SAND FOR WATER DIVISION
West Coast Sand & Gravel, Inc.

Description

SAND FOR WATER DIVISION
West Coast Arborists, Inc
Description
TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES 3/16/26-3/31/26

VJ MEMORIALS
Description

FINAL PAYMENT FOR PURPLE HEART MONUMENT

VISION ADU LLC
Description
REFUND FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT DEPOSIT, 9728 WHITELAND ST
user: April Zamora Pages: 16 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300547 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $50.94
Invoice Amount
436403 $25.47
436099 $25.47
300548 04/22/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $3,423.08 Invoice Amount
323053-00 $391.76
323098-00 $1,368.25
323098-01 $1,218.25
323056-00 $444.82
300549 04/23/2026 05/01/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$215.64
Account Type
Non-Residential
300550 04/23/2026 05/01/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$43.65
Account Type
Non-Residential
300551 04/23/2026 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable American Heritage Life Insurance Co $48.64 Description Transaction Type
REISSUE CHECK TO CORRECT MAILING ADDRESS Refund Adjustment REISSUE CHECK TO CORRECT MAILING ADDRESS Refund Adjustment

MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT CO

ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT CO
Description Transaction Type

SMALL TOOLS FOR FACILITIES

ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR MEDIANS

ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR MEDIANS

TOP SOIL
AAA Electrical Supply, Inc.

Description
Whittier Fertilizer Company
Description

TOP SOIL
user: April Zamora Pages: 17 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
Invoice Amount
M0163615097 $48.64
300552 04/23/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $298.49
Invoice Amount
042326 $298.49
300553 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $150.00
Invoice Amount
042326 $150.00
300554 04/23/2026 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $200.00
Invoice Amount
042326 $200.00
300555 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$83.11
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300556 04/23/2026 04/29/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$93.94
Account Type Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment

DE LEON, SILVIA

CARRILLO, JOSE
Description Transaction Type
Levying Officer
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 04/17/26
Franchise Tax Board
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 04/17/26
BMG Money, Inc
Description
EMPLOYEE DEDUCTION FOR P/E 04/17/26
Description
SUPPLEMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE FOR APRIL 2026
user: April Zamora Pages: 18 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
Single-Family Residential
300557 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$8.28
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300558 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$51.96
Account Type
Non-Residential
300559 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$72.24
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300560 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$41.89
Account Type
Non-Residential
300561 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$43.40
Account Type
Single-Family Residential Refund Adjustment

KEYMAX GROUP
Description Transaction Type
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment
Refund Adjustment

JC COUNTERTOPS LLC

GARCIA, VERA
Description Transaction Type
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment
Refund Adjustment
DOLLAR EXPRESS INC., DOLEX

DIAZ, IRENE
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment
user: April Zamora Pages: 19 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300562 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$34.37
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300563 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$46.85
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300564 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$17.58
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300565 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$53.31
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300566 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$14.93
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment
Refund Adjustment

PEREZ, GRISELDA

ORTIZ, JANIRA
Description Transaction Type
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment
Refund Adjustment

MUNOZ, ANAY

MNO INVESTMENT LLC
Description Transaction Type
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment

MIRANDA, ABIGAIL
user: April Zamora Pages: 20 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300567 04/23/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$972.38
Account Type
Construction
300568 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $146.08
Invoice Amount
142679 $146.08
300569 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $35.94
Invoice Amount
22814 $35.94
300570 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $569.08
Invoice Amount
130095 $152.99
127226 $416.09
300571 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $70.00
Invoice Amount
646501 $35.00
646500 ALARM MONITORING SVC MARCH 2026- CITY YARD $35.00

AM-TEC TOTAL SECURITY INC
Description
ALARM MONITORING MARCH 2026- PARKS AND REC
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR STREETS DIVISION

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR STREET DIVISION
Description

GATE HINGES FOR COMMUNITY GARDENS
Alan's Lawnmower & Garden Center
Description
PORTABLE RESTROOMS FOR COMMUNITY GARDENS 4/7/26-5/4/26

A & G SALES
Refund Adjustment
1st Jon Inc

THAT ONE PLUMBING
Description Transaction Type
user: April Zamora Pages: 21 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300572 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $755.21
Invoice Amount
260406025101 $755.21
300573 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $447.30
Invoice Amount
785149 $447.30
300574 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $280.00
Invoice Amount
146672 $280.00
300575 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,329.00
Invoice Amount
7098-49305 $1,329.00
300576 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $500.00
Invoice Amount
138 MOTHER DAUGHTER PAINT AND SIP $500.00

STORAGE COVER FOR SMITH PARK
CAMPOS, FLOR, M.

Description
ONLINE DRIVER'S ED, MARCH-APRIL 2026
C & O Manufacturing
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, GENERAL LABOR
Bay Area Driving School, Inc.

Description
AFTER HOURS ANSWERING SVCS FOR STREET DIV. FEB & MAR 2026 Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo
Description
Ansafone Contact Center, Labell Exchange & BTE Com
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 22 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300577 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $31,557.20
Invoice Amount
2425939 $31,557.20
300578 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $3,591.53
Invoice Amount
261408 $3,591.53
300579 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $121.20
Invoice Amount
RE-PW26040606039 $121.20
300580 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $3,793.93
Invoice Amount
W97784370101 $235.59
W29590540102 $59.64
W29590540101 $3,498.70
300581 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $2,500.00
Invoice Amount
04142026 $2,500.00

ELVIS SHOW SOCAL
Description
AUDIO SVCS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, 4/14/26

REACH SITE SUPPLIES

DROPSHIP LIFTGATE
MOBILE 12 SECTION CUBBY STORAGE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS THROUGH MARCH 2026

DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY
Description
GOPHER ABATEMENT SVCS FOR PARKS JANUARY 2026
County of Los Angeles Dept of Public Works
Description
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS-JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER 2025 County of LA, Agricultural Comm, Weights & Measure
Description
City of Santa Fe Springs
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 23 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300582 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $2,030.00
Invoice Amount
925 $815.00
924 $610.00
923 $605.00
300583 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $51.71
Invoice Amount
033775123 $51.71
300584 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,251.40
Invoice Amount
101926 $1,251.40
300585 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,856.25
Invoice Amount
69989 $1,856.25
300586 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,500.00
Invoice Description Amount
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 9/28/25-10/25/25, DEV IMPACT FEE UPDATE

HERNANDEZ, ROBERT
Description

LOCKS FOR FACILITIES
Harris & Associates, Inc
Description

SPORT-TEK LADIES SPORT-WICK FLEECE
GREENS SECURITY CENTERS INC.

DETAILING SVCS FOR CITY FLEET

DETAILING SVCS FOR CITY FLEET
Galls Parent Holdings, LLC

EXTREME AUTO DETAILERS
Description

DETAILING SVCS FOR CITY FLEET
user: April Zamora Pages: 24 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
01262026 $1,500.00
300587 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $8,793.35
Invoice Amount
2026-045831 $8,793.35
300588 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $14,535.00
Invoice Amount
5319 $14,535.00
300589 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,694.81
Invoice Amount
65268 $1,694.81
300590 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $500.00
Invoice Amount
BI 15393 $500.00
300591 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $9,257.83
Invoice Amount
6918 $9,257.83
Description

SUPPLIES FOR HORSE TRAIL REPAIRS
Description
BUILDING OFFICIAL SVCS, 03/01/26-03/31/26
JCT Company, Inc.

Description
TRANSPORTATION TO DODGER STADIUM, 4/11/26
Jas Pacific, Inc.

Description
ON-CALL IT MANAGEMENT MARCH 2026
Inland Empire Stages, LTD
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 2/28/26-3/31/26
Infinity Technologies
PERFORMANCE FOR FARMER'S MARKET 5/13/26

ICF INCORPORATED, LLC
user: April Zamora Pages: 25 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300592 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $626.75
Invoice Amount
IN1565265 $626.75
300593 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $8,844.50
Invoice Amount
SI4200-28605 $8,844.50
300594 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $468.00
Invoice Amount
146866-146868 $468.00
300595 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $5,000.00
Invoice Amount
2026-01 $5,000.00
300596 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,105.00
Invoice Amount
123048 $1,105.00
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS 2/26/26-3/25/26, RIO HONDO PARK
Description

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SVCS FOR THE WORLD SPIRIT FESTIVAL RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS-PLANNERS, INC.

Description
BALLET FOLKLORICO CLASSES, AGES 5-12 YRS OLD, 3/7/25-4/25/26

PUBLIC MATTERS LLC
Description
REFERENCE# 902172 6016 ROSEMEAD FOR QTR COMMENCING 5/1/26

NUNEZ, DESTINEE
Description

FARMER'S MARKET VENDOR FEES

NETWATCH NORTH AMERICA
Los Angeles County Department Public Health
user: April Zamora Pages: 26 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300597 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $2,903.14
Invoice Amount
1928-00-PP24-1 $2,903.14
300598 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $601.03
Invoice Amount
54344 $601.03
300599 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $7,856.98
Invoice Amount
2026-04-07-112 $7,856.98
300600 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $20,000.00
Invoice Amount
INV-10723 $20,000.00
300601 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $299.91
Invoice Amount
4644028-A $17.09
4640387-A $282.82
Description

LATE PAYMENT PENALTY

REINSTATEMENT FEE
Description
INITIAL CONSULTING SVC FOR FIFA WORLD CUP EVENTS 2026
South Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dist
Description
PROJECT ADMIN-ROSEWOOD CORRIDOR 02/01/26-02/28/26
SOUNDSKILZ, INC.

Description

VETERAN'S MEMORIAL WALL PLAQUES

SHARED USE MOBILITY CENTER
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26, ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Saxton Industrial, Inc.

RRM DESIGN GROUP, A CALIFORNIA GROUP
user: April Zamora Pages: 27 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300602 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $947.53
Invoice Amount
7100062723 $947.53
300603 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $22,788.00
Invoice Amount
876 $21,648.00
868 $1,140.00
300604 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $18,400.00
Invoice Amount
82799 $18,400.00
300605 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $954.52
Invoice Amount
95174 $477.26
94141 $477.26
300606 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $224.00
Invoice Amount
036545 $224.00
Description
FINGERPRINT APPS MARCH 2026
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SVCS MARCH 2026
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE SVCS FEBRUARY 2026
State of California Dept of Justice
SECURITY SERVICE, 04/01/26-04/14/26
Specialized Elevator Corporation
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, TITLE VI ASSESSMENT
SOUTHWEST PATROL, INC.

Description

SOUTHSTAR DCCM
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, STAFF AUGMENTATION COUNTER REP

SOUTHERN TIRE MART, LLC
Description

COMMERCIAL TIRES FOR CITY FLEET
user: April Zamora Pages: 28 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
300607 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $265.79
Invoice Amount
21652 $265.79
300608 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $4,358.79
Invoice Amount
43822 $2,222.44
43893 $2,136.35
300609 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $887.70
Invoice Amount
2190496567 $442.27
2190499823 $445.43
300610 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,890.00
Invoice Amount
1-12070 $1,890.00
300611 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $48.72
Invoice Amount
TREE INSPECTIONS 3/30/26-4/10/26
Whittier Fertilizer Company
Description

UNIFORM RENTAL SVCS
West Coast Arborists, Inc
Description

UNIFIRST CORPORATION
Description

UNIFORM RENTAL SERVICES
Description

SOCCER PACKAGE, JERSEY, SHORTS & MEDAL

TRIANGLE CUT VOLLEYBALL JERSEY
Description

FLAGS FOR FACILITIES
Triangle Sports, Inc.

The Flag Shop
user: April Zamora Pages: 29 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
435789 $48.72
300612 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $5,400.00
Invoice Amount
2975 $5,400.00
300613 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $9,152.50
Invoice Amount
05/25/2026 $9,152.50
300614 04/30/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$27.90
Account Type
Non-Residential
300615 04/30/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$115.16
Account Type
Single-Family Residential
300616 04/30/2026 Utility Management
Refund
$12.44
Account Type
Single-Family Residential Refund Adjustment

LOPEZ, MARCIA
Description Transaction Type
Description Transaction Type
Refund Adjustment
Refund Adjustment

DE LA CRUZ, MERCEDES
CATERING BREAKFAST AT THE 2026 MEMORIAL DAY EVENT
COLLEGIATE CIRCUIT INC.

Description Transaction Type
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, CONSULTANT SVCS
Zapien's Restaurant Group, Inc.

Description

LANDSCAPE MATERIALS FOR PARKS

Z&K CONSULTANTS
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 30 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
$578,971.09
19854 04/20/2026 Accounts Payable $338.01
Invoice Amount
Import - 29971 $338.01
19855 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $79,569.56
Invoice Amount
1057312 $41,381.28
1055107 $38,188.28
19856 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $50.00
Invoice Amount
20260326-217 $50.00
19857 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $70.00
Invoice Amount
20260326-218 $70.00
19858 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $37.04
Description
Event attended by Pamela Yugar during 2026 CPRS./CALIFORNIA PARK US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Transfer fee for Leticia Reyes to attend 2026 CPRS./CALIFORNIA P US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
LONG TERM ALLOCATION, POWER VA SALES-12/01/25-12/31/25
LONG TERM ALLOCATION, POWER VA SALES-11/01/25-11/30/25
US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS MARCH 2026
So Calif Edison Company
Description
EFT
So Calif Gas Company
Description
Type Check Totals:
user: April Zamora Pages: 31 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
Invoice Amount
20260326-219 $37.04
19859 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $304.85
Invoice Amount
20260326-220 $304.85
19860 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $58.11
Invoice Amount
20260326-221 $58.11
19861 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $180.00
Invoice Amount
20260326-222 $180.00
19862 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $124.83
Invoice Amount
20260326-223 $124.83
19863 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $226.52
Invoice Description Amount
Description
Departmental supplies for Spring Camp./COSTCO WHSE #0424 US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
The balance due between member and non-member registration for L US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Departmental supplies for Spring Camp./AMAZON MKTPL*BE81M8JK0 US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Departmental Supplies for Spring Camp./COSTCO WHSE #0410 US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Departmental supplies for Spring Camp./DOLLAR TREE
US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
user: April Zamora Pages: 32 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
20260326-224 $226.52
19864 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $19.37
Invoice Amount
20260326-225 $19.37
19865 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $900.00
Invoice Amount
20260326-226 $900.00
19866 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $179.00
Invoice Amount
20260326-227 $179.00
19867 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $1,060.74
Invoice Amount
20260326-228 $1,060.74
19868 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $41.44
Invoice Amount
20260326-229 $41.44
Description
Eye Wash Solution For Street Maintenance /AMAZON.COM*BD76O68U1 Description
Due to the HVAC system being out at the Parks & Recreation Admin US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Annual subscription for Astute Graphics plugins. Used by the Med US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Annual software licensing for Dropbox via Media Department./DROP US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Description
Departmental supplies for Spring Camp./SQ *DOLLAR KING PICO RIVE US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
Panelist Lunch for Parks & Rec EA recruitment./CLEARMANS STEAK N US Bank Corporate Trust Services (CalCard)
user: April Zamora Pages: 33 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
19869 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $1,900.00
Invoice Amount
12943 $500.00
12942 $1,400.00
19870 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $232.58
Invoice Amount
9127-26 $232.58
19871 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $105.00
Invoice Amount
SPRGWK5'26 $105.00
19872 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $5,000.00
Invoice Amount
2026-04-17 $5,000.00
19873 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $2,257.05
Invoice Amount
38230 $1,200.00
Eastern County Newspaper Group, Inc.

Description
LEGAL AD STATEMENT NO.38230 HALF PAGE AD FOR EASTER PRIME,04/03

COLLECTIVE EMERGENCE CONSULTING
Description
GRANT WRITING SVCS, APRIL 2026
Bland, Renee
Description
OFFICIATING SVCS 04/16/26
American Marker
Description

EASTER EVENT STAGE BANNER
Description
LC ADA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS JANUARY 2026-DECEMBER 2026 CDBG-CV ADMINISTRATION FOR MARCH 2026
Advanced Avant-Garde Corp.
user: April Zamora Pages: 34 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
38237 $1,057.05
19874 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $2,135.74
Invoice Amount
INV3020005039 $250.00
INV3112000051 $250.00
INV3020000067 $250.00
INV3110004107 $244.64
INV3110004098 $162.98
INV3110003889 $250.00
INV3022000034 $202.89
INV3110003831 $250.00
CM3110000106 ($224.77)
INV3110003189 $250.00
INV3020004870 $250.00
19875 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $5,100.00
Invoice Amount
26-004 $5,100.00
19876 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $7,730.08
Description
HOMELESS LIAISON SVCS, 4/1/26-4/15/26
I Copy, Inc (ibe digital)

SAFETY SHOES FOR GARY PANGANIBAN

SAFETY SHOES FOR DANIEL GUTIERREZ

HOMELESS OUTREACH, LLC

SAFETY SHOES FOR ALEXANDER ANGEL

SAFETY SHOES FOR OSCAR ARCINIEGA

CREDIT TO ACCOUNT

SAFETY SHOES FOR ALLAN MARIN

SAFETY SHOES FOR RONIN LOPEZ

SAFETY SHOES FOR CARLOS RIVERA

SAFETY SHOE ADRIAN RODRIGUEZ

SAFETY SHOES FOR ALBERT RAMIREZ

SAFETY SHOES FOR CARLOS DEL TORO
LEGAL AD FOR 2026 PRIME RATES PUBLISHED ON 4/3/26

GCP WW HOLDCO LLC
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 35 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
Invoice Amount
596518672 $7,730.08
19877 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $5,546.00
Invoice Amount
3571131 $5,546.00
19878 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $81,284.96
Invoice Amount
35524 $6,728.95
35519 $9,051.75
35506 $65,504.26
19879 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $351.31
Invoice Amount
923112 $351.31
19880 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $2,070.00
Invoice Amount
2026-000740 $1,035.00
2026-000987 $1,035.00
PEST CONTROL SVCS FOR ALL CITY FACILITIES- MARCH 2026
PEST CONTROL SVCS -APRIL 2026

MAINTENANCE SUPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION
Rousselle Company Inc.

Description
SWEEPING SVCS APRIL 2026
PDQ Rentals
Description
Description
FUEL ADJUSTMENT MARCH 2026
CATCH BASIN CLEANING SVCS MARCH 2026
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS MARCH 2026, ALEBRIJE DOG PARK
Nationwide Environmental Services
Description
COPIER LEASE 4/1/26-4/30/26
Interwest Consulting Group
user: April Zamora Pages: 36 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
19881 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $2,801.25
Invoice Amount
15286 $2,801.25
19882 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $435.81
Invoice Amount
S100267831.001 $435.81
19883 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $3,731.50
Invoice Amount
127303 $3,731.50
19884 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $285.05
Invoice Amount
25-263311 $77.25
320260551 $207.80
19885 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $11,987.50
Invoice Amount
22-50075 $12,618.42

URBAN HABITAT
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS SEPTEMBER 2025, MAJOR CORRIDORS MEDIAN Description

MONTHLY TICKETS

MONTHLY DATABASE TICKETS
Description
GENERAL LIAB FEES FOR MAY 2026
Underground Service Alert of Southern California
Description

MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FOR WATER DIVISION
Tristar Risk Management
Description

MHP RSO ADMINISTRATION SVCS
S & J Supply Co., Inc.

RSG, Inc
user: April Zamora Pages: 37 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
22-50075-A ($630.92)
19886 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $200.28
Invoice Amount
6150402 $200.28
19887 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $2,436.00
Invoice Amount
W6D0287 $65.00
W6D0286 $65.00
W6D0285 $65.00
W6D0284 $220.00
W6D0041 $300.00
W6C2156 $70.00
W6C0632 $300.00
W6C0633 $70.00
W6C0634 $70.00
W6C1722 $51.00
W6C1729 $210.00
W6C1723 $70.00
W6C1724 WATER QUALITY SAMPLING $70.00

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

ASPHALT MAINTENANCE
Weck Laboratories Inc.

Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS SEPTEMBER 2025, MAJOR CORRIDORS MEDIAN Vulcan Materials Co.

Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 38 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
W6C1726 $70.00
W6C1727 $300.00
W6C2045 $300.00
W6C2154 $70.00
W6C2155 $70.00
19888 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $766.50
Invoice Amount
00423755 $766.50
19890 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $2,042.94
Invoice Amount
BE006995131 $2,058.82
BE006995131-ADJ ($15.88)
19891 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $1,732.90
Invoice Amount
040126 $1,732.90
19892 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $8,585.30
Invoice Amount
SUPPLEMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE FOR APRIL 2026
Nationwide Retirement Solutions
Description
DENTAL SERVICES (DHMO) FOR APRIL 2026-ADJUSTMENTS
Lincoln Financial Group
Description
Delta Dental (Delta Care)
Description
DENTAL SERVICES (DHMO) FOR APRIL 2026
Willdan Engineering
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/3/26, LABOR COMPLIANCE

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING

WATER QUALITY SAMPLING
user: April Zamora Pages: 39 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
042326 $8,585.30
19893 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $1,143.68
Invoice Amount
042326 $1,143.68
19894 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $741.00
Invoice Amount
042326 $741.00
19895 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $2,030.34
Invoice Amount
042326 $2,030.34
19896 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $133.00
Invoice Amount
042326 $133.00
19897 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $15,538.70
Invoice Amount
040126 GROUP LIFE, STD & LTD PREMIUMS FOR APRIL 2026 $15,538.30 COPE FEES FOR P/E 04/17/26
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Description
UNION DUES FOR P/E 04/17/26
SEIU Local 721-COPE
Description
UNION DUES FOR P/E 04/17/26
SEIU Local 721
Description
PEHP BENEFIT/DEDUCTION FOR P/E 04/17/26

PRMPCEA
Description
EMPLOYEE/EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS FOR P/E 04/17/26 (401A) Nationwide RS
Description
user: April Zamora Pages: 40 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
040126-ADJ $0.40
19898 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $81.06
Invoice Amount
Import - 29985 $81.06
19899 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $517.59
Invoice Amount
Import - 29986 $517.59
19900 04/21/2026 Accounts Payable $700.00
Invoice Amount
Import - 29987 $700.00
19901 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $522.20
Invoice Amount
Import - 29988 $522.20
19902 04/22/2026 Accounts Payable $76.91
Invoice Amount
Import - 29989 $76.91
Description
Phone Svc for April 2026
Description
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS MARCH 2026
Frontier California
Description
INTERNET SVCS-APRIL 2026
So Calif Gas Company
Description
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS MARCH 2026
Time Warner Cable
Description
Phone Svc for MARCH 2026
So Calif Gas Company
ADJUSTMENTS FOR APRIL 2026
Frontier California
user: April Zamora Pages: 41 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
19903 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $1,768.71
Invoice Amount
Import - 29990 $1,768.71
19904 04/23/2026 Accounts Payable $105.52
Invoice Amount
Import - 29991 $105.52
19905 04/24/2026 Accounts Payable $32.94
Invoice Amount
Import - 29992 $32.94
19906 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $11,383.14
Invoice Amount
SA42026 $11,383.14
19907 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $5,395.00
Invoice Amount
014385 $1,150.00
014386 $1,380.00
Description
TRANSPORTATION FOR REACH RECITAL PICKUP 2026
TRANSPORTATION FOR REACH RECITAL 2026
Description
CHECK REGISTER 4/15/26
A & D Transportation, L.P.

Description
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS MARCH 2026
(Troon) Indigo Sports, LLC
Description

WATER SVC
So Calif Gas Company
Description
UTILITIES-GAS SVCS MARCH 2026
City of Pico Rivera
So Calif Gas Company
user: April Zamora Pages: 42 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
014282 $1,415.00
014254 $1,450.00
19908 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $331.54
Invoice Amount
323110-00 $331.54
19909 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $9,303.83
Invoice Amount
19907517 $9,303.83
19910 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $4,856.72
Invoice Amount
W01065 $4,856.72
19911 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $343.33
Invoice Amount
9152-26 $343.33
19912 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $270.00
Invoice Description Amount
Description

CITY OF PR CITY SEAL FRONT AND BACK

BACLIG, ANTHONY
Description

PARKING ENFORCEMENT PAMPHLETS TRI-FOLDED
American Marker
Description
HVAC MAINTENANCE SVCS-MARCH 2026
Advanced Printing
Description

ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES
ABM Building Solutions, LLC
TRANSPORTATION FOR NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM-REACH, 4/8/26 TRANSPORTATION TO SANTA ANA ZOO-REACH, 2/25/26
AAA Electrical Supply, Inc.
user: April Zamora Pages: 43 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
146722 $270.00
19913 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $681.60
Invoice Amount
146747-1460750 $681.60
19914 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $105.00
Invoice Amount
SPRGWK6'26 $105.00
19915 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $17,112.87
Invoice Amount
CL59112 $9,542.36
CL59961 $7,570.51
19916 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $900.00
Invoice Amount
146714-146716 $900.00
19917 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $6,498.30
Invoice Amount
Eastern County Newspaper Group, Inc.

Description
Dance Image
Description

TWINKLE TOES & TAP
Description
FUEL FOR CITY FLEET- 04/01/26-04/10/26
FUEL FOR CITY FLEET 4/11/26-4/20/26
Description
OFFICIATING SVCS 04/23/26
Cosby Oil Company
Description
INSTRUCTOR FOR STRONG NATION HIIT, 04/02/26-04/30/26
Bland, Renee
INSTRUCTOR FOR TAI CHI FOR 04/01/26-04/22/26
BAUTISTA, LISSETTE, G.
user: April Zamora Pages: 44 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
38251 $2,857.95
38256 $2,440.35
38245 $1,200.00
19918 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $1,661.89
Invoice Amount
INV3110003739 $250.00
INV3020004556 $250.00
INV3020004148 $213.85
INV3020000125 $82.55
INV3110000097 $162.98
#INV3110002583 $209.83
INV#3020000181 $243.68
INV3160000134 $249.00
19919 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $9,778.77
Invoice Amount
18931 $9,778.77
19920 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $73.09
Invoice Amount
I Copy, Inc (ibe digital)
Description

GENERAL BUILDING MANAGEMENT
Description
JANITORIAL SVCS MARCH 2026

BOOTS FOR TERI HUPMAN

BOOTS FOR ENRIQUE BARAJAS

SAFETY BOOT FOR JOSE MARTINEZ

SAFETY SHOES FOR DARROW ATKINS

SAFETY SHOES FOR CHRISTIAN CARDENAS

SAFETY SHOES FOR CHRISTIAN CARDENAS
Description

SAFETY SHOES FOR JONATHAN FLORES

SAFETY SHOES FOR MIGUEL RIVERA
FY26-27 USER FEE SCHEDULE AND ATLAS PLANNING PSA EXTENSION

AD FOR EARTH DAY - PRIME DEPARTMENT

GCP WW HOLDCO LLC
PH SMOKEFREE MULTI-UNIT HOUSING & PC/PH 5201-5211 PARAMOUNT BL user: April Zamora Pages: 45 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
491331 $18.27
491327 $18.27
491796 $36.55
19921 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $42,845.80
Invoice Amount
119150 $42,845.80
19922 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $54,344.21
Invoice Amount
35517 $32,035.07
35505 $22,309.14
19923 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $250.00
Invoice Amount
932ST1-3256991 $250.00
19924 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $858.00
Invoice Amount
146816 $858.00
Serrano, Leon
Description
INSTRUCTOR FOR TIKI TAKA SOCCER, 04/01/26-04/22/26
Red Wing Shoe Store
Description

SAFETY SHOES FOR JAMES RODRIGUEZ
Description
GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SVCS MARCH 2026
BUS STOP SVCS APRIL 2026
Description
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SVCS MARCH 2026
Nationwide Environmental Services
TONER
TONER
Mariposa Landscapes, Inc

TONER FOR SENIOR CENTER
user: April Zamora Pages: 46 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
19925 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $924.00
Invoice Amount
146685-146685 $924.00
19926 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $3,057.88
Invoice Amount
59299185070326 $228.92
50306184420326 $1,144.60
60768185070426 $35.10
54423184420426 $125.37
60099185070426 $200.77
30569191510326 $816.65
56790184420426 $149.65
60891185070426 $203.74
37317191510426 $153.08
19927 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $520.54
Invoice Amount
252655878-009 $94.14
252654932-010 $94.14
252655163-009 REACH STORAGE CONTAINER $94.14
Description

REACH STORAGE CONTAINER

REACH STORAGE CONTAINER

GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SUPPLIES

GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SUPPLIES
United Rentals (North America), Inc

PAINT SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SUPPLIES

PAINT SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SUPPLIES

PAINT SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES

PAINT SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES
The Sherwin-Williams Co.

Description

GRAFFITI ABATEMENT SUPPLIES
Silva, Luz
Description
INSTRUCTOR FOR ZUMBA, 04/07/26-04/30/26
user: April Zamora Pages: 47 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
235294174-025 $143.98
252655580-009 $94.14
19928 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $859.50
Invoice Amount
00342299 $198.00
00342298 $99.50
00342300 $562.00
19929 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $313.65
Invoice Amount
Import - 29995 $313.65
19930 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $22,419.59
Invoice Amount
Import - 29996 $22,419.59
19931 04/29/2026 Accounts Payable $613.69
Invoice Amount
Import - 29997 $613.69
Description
Office Supplies-MARCH 2026
Description
UTILITIES FOR MARCH 2026
Office Depot
Description
Phone Svc for APRIL 2026
So Calif Edison Company
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/3/26, HSIP11 CITYWIDE TS
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/3/26, HSIP11 CITYWIDE SIGNS Frontier California
Willdan Engineering
Description
PROFESSIONAL SVCS THROUGH 4/3/26, HSIP11 SCHOOL CROSSINGS

REACH STORAGE CONTAINER

REACH STORAGE CONTAINER
user: April Zamora Pages: 48 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
19932 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $35,064.26
Invoice Amount
Import - 29993 $35,064.26
19933 04/28/2026 Accounts Payable $46,881.67
Invoice Amount
Import - 29994 $46,881.67
19934 04/30/2026 Accounts Payable $76.91
Invoice Amount
Import - 29998 $76.91
$532,993.65
Description
Phone Svc for APRIL 2026
Type EFT Totals:

Description
UTILITIES FOR MARCH 2026
Frontier California
Description

WATER SVC
So Calif Edison Company
City of Pico Rivera
user: April Zamora Pages: 49 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
Number Date Description Source Transaction Amount
City of Pico Rivera
AP Warrant Register
From Payment Date: 4/17/2026 - To Payment Date: 4/30/2026 Payee Name
Checks
EFTs
All
$1,111,964.74
Transaction Amount
$532,993.65
$578,971.09
Transaction Amount
Grand Totals:

Transaction Amount
CBC GenOpe - CBC General Operating Totals
user: April Zamora Pages: 50 of 50 Monday, May 4, 2026
To: Mayor and City Council
From: City Manager
Meeting Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE CITYWIDE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN, (NON-CIP NO. 30060)
Recommendation:

1. Approve a resolution to adopt the Citywide Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) and Vision Zero Policy for the City of Pico Rivera.

Strategic Priority:
4 - Health, Wellness & Safety - Create a safe and thriving City with low crime and high standards for health and wellness
Strategy:

4.2 Promote public safety to foster a secure community.

Fiscal Impact:

The fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 Adopted Budget includes $300,000 in Safe Streets and Roads for All Program (SS4A) federal grant (Fund 698), Account No. 698.70.7300-54500- NonCIP30060 and $115,000 in Measure M funds (Fund 208) in Account No. 208.70.7300.54500-NonCIP30060. The total Project budget is $415,000. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Discussion:

The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), the SS4A provides grants to local, regional and tribal communities for implementation, planning and demonstration activities as part of a systematic approach to prevent deaths and serious injuries on the nation’s roadways. This roadway safety initiative was created by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and provides a total program of $5 billion over five (5) years.

The SS4A is exclusively designed to help local communities with projects and activities that will significantly improve safety for all people using the road including drivers, passengers, pedestrians, bicyclists, people using transit and people with disabilities. The 4 Back to Outline
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026

RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE CITYWIDE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN, (NON-CIP NO. 30060)

SS4A program funds two (2) types of grants: 1) Planning and Demonstration Grants for the completion of a CSAP and 2) Implementation Grants to construct and implement projects identified in an existing Action Plan.

On December 13, 2023, the USDOT announced the award of 385 new SS4A grants and the City of Pico Rivera (City) was awarded $300,000 to complete a CSAP citywide. The comprehensive action plan will meet all the specific goals established by the USDOT through the SS4A program phases and requirements.

On May 13, 2025, the City Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to TJKM Transportation Consultants (TJKM) for the development of the Citywide CSAP.

The CSAP, developed by TJKM in collaboration with the City, provides a systemic safety approach that focuses on evaluating the City’s entire roadway network using a defined set of criteria. The plan studies accident history on an aggregate basis to identify highrisk roadway characteristics, rather than looking at high-collision concentration locations through site analysis. Systemic analysis acknowledges that crashes alone are not always sufficient to prioritize countermeasures across a system. This is particularly true for many local streets with low volumes where crash densities tend to be low and there are few high crash locations, and in urban areas where vehicles interact with vulnerable road users (i.e., pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcycles).

In addition, a key component to the CSAP was community engagement and participation of City roadway stakeholders, which included Los Angeles County Sherriff and Fire Departments as well as the general public. To gather community input, stakeholder group meetings were held during development of the CSAP in addition to publishing a safety survey through the City’s social media accounts and City website for the general public to comment on locations and provide descriptions of traffic safety concerns within the City.

TJKM analyzed 895 injury collisions that occurred from 2020 to 2024 within the City and summarized the collisions by location, severity, primary collision factor, lighting conditions and facility type. Collision data was obtained through the Transportation Injury Mapping System and Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. Prominent collision patterns include broadside and rear-end as well as collisions due to unsafe speed.

The CSAP was completed by TJKM in May 2026. During the 12-month review process, collision patterns and field investigations were conducted. And as part of this study, safety improvements based on Caltrans Local Safety Roadway Manual (LSRM) were recommended. The identified locations were given recommended countermeasures, location- specific safety improvements segments and intersections, and preliminary benefit-cost ratios which help contextualize the cost effectiveness of implementing each countermeasure.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026

RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE CITYWIDE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN, (NON-CIP NO. 30060)

A total of 10 safety projects were developed and prioritized based on benefit-to-cost ratio calculations as outlined in the Caltrans LRSM. Recommended improvements included, but were not limited to, construction of missing sidewalk, bicycle infrastructure improvements, bus stop improvements, signal hardware improvements, signal timing updates, striping modifications, signage upgrades, installation of speed warning signs and enhancement to unsignalized intersection crossings within the City. Three (3) particular projects identified are described below:

Project Description Project Location Estimated Project Cost Range
1) New traffic signal
installation
Paramount Boulevard at
Unser Street $800,000 - $1,200,000
2) Beverly Road corridor
improvements to include
installation of sidewalk, curb
and gutter, bike lanes and
traffic calming measures
Beverly Rd from Rio
Hondo Channel to San
Gabriel River Parkway $1,800,000 - $2,400,000
3) Citywide streetlight safety
assessment
All streets Citywide $1,500,000 - $1,800,000
Estimated Total: $4,100,000 - $5,400,000
The projects identified in the table above are unfunded and not included in the current 5- year Capital Improvement Project. Implementation and funding for these projects will be ongoing and staff will continue to look for funding opportunities. The CSAP is an evolving document and will be updated periodically to address future infrastructure needs and support ongoing efforts to reduce traffic collisions.

A summary of the project budget and expenditures is provided below:

Budget Estimated Budget
SS4A Federal Funds (Fund 698) $300,000
Measure M (Fund 208) $115,000
Total Project Budget: $415,000
Project Expenditures Amount
Planning and Design $320,062
Project Administration $42,029
Total Estimated Project Cost: $362,091
In addition, as part of the City’s continued efforts to improve roadway safety, the CSAP incorporates key principles of the Vision Zero framework. Vision Zero is an internationally recognized strategy that prioritizes the elimination of severe and fatal traffic collisions CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT – MEETING OF MAY 12, 2026

RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE CITYWIDE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY ACTION PLAN, (NON-CIP NO. 30060)

through a proactive, data‑driven approach focused on engineering, education, and enforcement. These Vision Zero principles support the City’s long‑term goal of reducing or eliminating severe or fatal collisions and align with the strategies identified and required in the CSAP. Several nearby jurisdictions in Los Angeles County—including the Cities of Baldwin Park, El Monte, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Pasadena, Glendale and the County of Los Angeles—have adopted Vision Zero initiatives, reflecting a regional commitment to improving transportation safety. Adoption of these principles will formalize the City’s commitment to prioritizing safety across its transportation network and enhance the City’s competitiveness for future state and federal grant opportunities, many of which now require jurisdictions to demonstrate alignment with Vision Zero policies. Therefore, staff recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution formally supporting these Vision Zero principles.

Conclusion:

The Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) was prepared in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Program and Caltrans Local Safety Roadway Manual. The Safe Streets and Roads for All Program provides grants to local, regional and tribal communities support projects and strategies that improve roadway safety, reduce traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries, and promote safer, more accessible transportation networks for all users. The CSAP, as a guidance document, will be periodically updated by Staff to assess its efficacy and potential project solutions. Staff will utilize the recommended safety measures in the CSAP to apply for future federal and state grant opportunities for implementation of traffic safety improvements. Staff recommend approving a resolution adopting the CSAP and Vision Zero principles.

Steve Carmona
SC:NN:KG:np
Enclosure: 1) Resolution / Exhibit A (CSAP Report)
RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA,

CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITYWIDE COMPREHENSIVE SAFETY

ACTION PLAN AND VISION ZERO POLICY FOR THE CITY OF PICO RIVERA
WHEREAS, globally, approximately 1.19 million people die on the world's roads each year as per World Health Organization (WHO), with road traffic injuries being the leading cause of death among children and young adults ages 5-29 years; and, WHEREAS, according to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, each year, approximately 42,000 people are killed in traffic collisions in the United States; and
WHEREAS, in a study comparing 19 peer nations, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that the United States has the highest traffic death rate per person; and,
WHEREAS, in California, 4,061 people died in traffic crashes in 2023, representing a fatality rate of 1.28 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled, with California ranking second in the nation for total traffic fatalities; and
WHEREAS, Los Angeles County ranked 5th out of California's 58 counties in 2022 for total fatal and injury collisions according to the California Office of Traffic Safety rankings, demonstrating the significant traffic safety challenges facing the region; and WHEREAS, the Gateway Cities Council of Governments region, comprising 27 member cities in Southeast Los Angeles County including Pico Rivera, collectively faces significant traffic safety challenges requiring coordinated regional action; and WHEREAS, from 2020-2024, Pico Rivera experienced 21 people killed in traffic collisions, 165 severely injured, 517 with visible injuries, and 388 with complaint of pain, including 6 pedestrians killed and 74 pedestrians injured, as well as 58 bicyclists injured, demonstrating the urgent need for comprehensive safety action; and WHEREAS, according to collision data analysis from 2020-2024, unsafe speed was the most common primary collision factor for collisions in Pico Rivera, accounting for 26 percent of killed and severely injured (KSI) collisions and 30 percent of injury collisions, followed by automobile right of way violations with 16 percent of KSI collisions and 18 percent of injury collisions; and
WHEREAS, in Pico Rivera, collision analysis from 2020-2024 shows that broadside collisions were the most common collision type, comprising 36 percent of KSI collisions and 32 percent of injury collisions, with 84 percent of KSI collisions and 81 percent of injury collisions occurring at intersections; and
Enclosure 1
4a
Back to Outline
RESOLUTION NO. ____

WHEREAS, Policy 5.2-15 of the Circulation Element of the Pico Rivera General Plan (2014) directs the City to consider development of a traffic calming program and implementation of traffic calming measures, where appropriate and feasible, to minimize the impacts on the use of local streets by vehicular traffic and to maintain the health, safety and livability of the neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the Pico Rivera Local Roadway Safety Plan (2023) establishes Goal 6 to serve as an informational document toward the development of a program to eliminate traffic deaths and severe injuries utilizing both sound engineering principles and a Vision Zero approach, while Objective 4.4 directs the City to continually seek funding sources to implement engineering, education, enforcement, equity, and emergency response solutions to roadway safety issues; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pico Rivera Strategic Plan (2022-2023) provides a shared vision for transportation infrastructure improvements benefiting residents, businesses, and visitors, ensuring that safety improvements and connectivity strategies identified in the Strategic Plan directly inform and align with the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP)'s approach to community safety; and
WHEREAS, the Historic Whittier Boulevard Vision and Multimodal Plans (2024) establish Goal MM-1 to provide Safe Streets for All Users by creating a mobility network that balances all modes while prioritizing safety for the most vulnerable road users, with safety improvements including protected bicycle lanes, enhanced crossings, traffic calming measures, and pedestrian-oriented street designs that directly support Vision Zero objectives; and,
WHEREAS, the Pico Rivera Urban Greening Plan (2015) promotes a safe and connected bicycle network, pedestrian improvements, and green street infrastructure that creates safer and more livable streets through environmental improvements, directly supporting the CSAP's Safe Systems approach and transportation equity objectives; and WHEREAS, the Pico Rivera Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (2025) includes Action TL 1.2 to support active transportation access and safety by identifying gaps in the active transportation network, expanding sidewalks and protected bike lanes, implementing Complete Streets principles, and promoting multimodal transportation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while improving safety for vulnerable road users; and WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Master Plan (currently in development) will provide a comprehensive framework for expanding and connecting the City's pedestrian and bicycle networks, establishing design standards and prioritizing safety improvements that align with and support the CSAP's vision for safe multimodal transportation throughout Pico Rivera; and
WHEREAS, the Rosewood Corridor planning initiatives (in development) will address multimodal safety improvements, traffic calming strategies, and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure along this key corridor, complementing the CSAP's RESOLUTION NO. ____

comprehensive approach to creating Safe Systems infrastructure throughout the community; and
WHEREAS, the Washington Transit-Oriented Development Specific Plan (2019) promotes creation of a mixed-use, compact, and multimodal environment with enhanced pedestrian scale and function, strengthened connections with local neighborhoods, and safe transportation options that advance Vision Zero goals by creating walkable, bikeable communities around transit nodes and reducing automobile dependence; and WHEREAS, the CSAP (Exhibit A) developed for the City of Pico Rivera provides a comprehensive framework for reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries through datadriven, evidence-based strategies; and WHEREAS, several federal and state grant funding programs require or strongly encourage the adoption of Vision Zero policies and Comprehensive Safety Action Plans as eligibility criteria or competitive advantages, including the federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program, the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) which requires a Local Roadway Safety Plan or Vision Zero Action Plan as equivalent documentation for funding eligibility, and various other transportation safety and active transportation grant programs, positioning cities with adopted Vision Zero policies to be significantly more competitive for these critical safety funding opportunities; and WHEREAS, approximately over 70 cities across the United States have formally adopted Vision Zero policies or committed to the goal of zero traffic deaths, including the State of California, Los Angeles County, the City of Los Angeles, West Hollywood, San Francisco, and numerous other jurisdictions nationwide, demonstrating widespread recognition of Vision Zero as a leading framework for achieving meaningful reductions in traffic fatalities and serious injuries; and
WHEREAS, Vision Zero is a public health-based traffic safety strategy to reduce and eventually eliminate traffic deaths and serious injuries using a data-driven, multidisciplinary, and safe systems approach that also increases safe, healthy, equitable mobility for all; and
WHEREAS, Vision Zero recognizes that while human error will always occur, a combination of engineering, education, and enforcement measures can reduce collisions and prevent collisions from causing death or severe injuries; and WHEREAS, one death or serious injury on City streets is one too many and City and departmental leadership are dedicated to strategies that aim to reduce and eliminate deaths and serious injuries on City streets; and
WHEREAS, increasing real and perceived safety for people walking and bicycling is a key step in enabling more people to choose these clean air modes of transportation that will support the City’s goal of promoting policies to help achieve state, regional, and local air quality and greenhouse gas emission reduction targets; and RESOLUTION NO. ____

WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration has committed to eliminating fatalities and serious injuries on the nation’s roadways using a data-driven interdisciplinary approach modeled after Vision Zero; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration identifies six principles that form the basis of the Safe System approach: deaths and serious injuries are unacceptable, humans make mistakes, humans are vulnerable, responsibility is shared, safety is proactive, and redundancy is crucial; and
WHEREAS, Vision Zero aims to design and operate roads to create a Safe System by implementing features appropriate for the intended and actual road use and speed environment, by reducing the likelihood of human error, and by reducing the consequences of error; and
WHEREAS, the California Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) establishes the statewide goal of achieving zero traffic fatalities and serious injuries on state highways by 2050, through Caltrans’s Director's Policy on Road Safety using proven effective strategies, countermeasures, and the Safe System Approach.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pico Rivera as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby declare that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Pico Rivera does hereby approve and adopt the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) and Vision Zero policies with the expressed goal of reducing the number of fatal and serious injury crashes along all roadways under the jurisdiction of the City to zero within 25 years of when the CSAP is adopted.

SECTION 3. The City Manager is authorized and hereby directed to:

1. Develop procedures and programs to further the goals and objectives of Vision Zero and take data-driven actions to achieve zero fatal and serious injury crashes based on available crash data and community input, including the “Es” of engineering, education, and enforcement, and

2. Propose as part of the fiscal year budget process to prioritize funding and availability of staff resources for implementing Vision Zero projects and programs; and

3. Adopt and proactively encourage the application of Proven Safety Countermeasures; and

4. Revise design criteria for new roadways and existing roadways to achieve a Desired Operating Speed appropriate for the context, that are sustainable and selfenforcing or self-encouraging, that are reflective of the current state of the practice for RESOLUTION NO. ____

context-sensitive, people-centric designs that are to human scale and recognize desire lines between people-centric origins and destinations, and assert context-sensitive, peoplecentric judgement over numerical warrants; and

5. Review laws, ordinances, rules, policies, procedures, and regulations for conflictive or contrary language and provide remedy through administrative, collaborative, or legislative action; and

6. Develop and maintain effective partnerships with other agencies, entities, organizations, community groups, and stakeholders to further the goals of and support for Vision Zero; and

7. Update and amend CSAP periodically to address future infrastructure needs and support ongoing efforts to reduce traffic collisions; and

8. Provide for ongoing evaluation and performance measurements, and present to the Council on a regular basis a report on the initial and ongoing status of achieving the goal of zero fatal and serious injury crashes within 25 years of when the CSAP is adopted SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this resolution and it shall thereupon be in full force and effect.

APPROVED AND PASSED this 12th day of May, 2026.
_______________________________
Gustavo V. Camacho, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ _________________________________ Cynthia Ayala, City Clerk Arnold M. Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney AYES:

NOES:

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 1

PICO RIVERA

CITYWIDE

COMPREHENSIVE
SAFETY

ACTION PLAN
2026

PREPARED BY
Exhibit A
This page is intentionally left blank
Prepared by: Signed for Approval:

Ruta Jariwala, PE,TE
Professional Civil Engineer & Project Manager,
TJKM Transportation Planning Consultants

PICO RIVERA

CITYWIDE

COMPREHENSIVE
SAFETY

ACTION PLAN
4 Leadership Commitment
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 5
Vision Zero Resolution
ZĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶEŽ͘ϮϬϮϲͲͺͺͺ
Z
^K>hd/KEK&d,
/dzKhE/>K&d,
/dzK&W/KZ/s
Z͕>/&KZE/͕hd,KZ//E'd,
/dz
DE'
ZdKKWds/^/KE
ZKd
EEd^EWK>/z&KZd,
/dzK&W/KZ/s
Z
t,
Z
^ ŐůŽďĂůůLJ͕ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϭ͘ϭϵŵŝůůŝŽŶƉĞŽƉůĞĚŝĞŽŶƚŚĞǁŽƌůĚΖƐƌŽĂĚƐĞĂĐŚLJĞĂƌ ĂƐƉĞƌtŽƌůĚ ,ĞĂůƚŚKƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶ;t,KͿ͕ǁŝƚŚƌŽĂĚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐďĞŝŶŐƚŚĞůĞĂĚŝŶŐĐĂƵƐĞŽĨĚĞĂƚŚĂŵŽŶŐĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶĂŶĚ LJŽƵŶŐĂĚƵůƚƐĂŐĞƐϱͲϮϵLJĞĂƌƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ ĚĂƚĂ ĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞ EĂƚŝŽŶĂů ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ dƌĂĨĨŝĐ ^ĂĨĞƚLJ ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ĞĂĐŚ LJĞĂƌ͕ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJϰϮ͕ϬϬϬƉĞŽƉůĞĂƌĞŬŝůůĞĚŝŶƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ŝŶ Ă ƐƚƵĚLJ ĐŽŵƉĂƌŝŶŐ ϭϵ ƉĞĞƌ ŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ĞŶƚĞƌ ĨŽƌ ŝƐĞĂƐĞ ŽŶƚƌŽů ĂŶĚ WƌĞǀĞŶƚŝŽŶ ĨŽƵŶĚ ƚŚĂƚ ƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐŚĂƐƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĚĞĂƚŚƌĂƚĞƉĞƌƉĞƌƐŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ŝŶĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͕ϰ͕ϬϲϭƉĞŽƉůĞĚŝĞĚŝŶƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ ŝŶϮϬϮϯ͕ƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚŝŶŐĂĨĂƚĂůŝƚLJƌĂƚĞŽĨϭ͘Ϯϴ ƉĞƌ ϭϬϬ ŵŝůůŝŽŶ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞ ŵŝůĞƐ ƚƌĂǀĞůĞĚ͕ ǁŝƚŚ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ ƌĂŶŬŝŶŐ ƐĞĐŽŶĚ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ŶĂƚŝŽŶ ĨŽƌ ƚŽƚĂů ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ >ŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐŽƵŶƚLJƌĂŶŬĞĚϱƚŚŽƵƚŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂΖƐϱϴĐŽƵŶƚŝĞƐŝŶϮϬϮϮĨŽƌƚŽƚĂůĨĂƚĂůĂŶĚŝŶũƵƌLJ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂKĨĨŝĐĞŽĨdƌĂĨĨŝĐ^ĂĨĞƚLJƌĂŶŬŝŶŐƐ͕ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐĨĂĐŝŶŐƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJŝƚŝĞƐŽƵŶĐŝůŽĨ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚƐƌĞŐŝŽŶ͕ĐŽŵƉƌŝƐŝŶŐϮϳŵĞŵďĞƌĐŝƚŝĞƐŝŶ^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ >ŽƐŶŐĞůĞƐŽƵŶƚLJŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ͕ĐŽůůĞĐƚŝǀĞůLJĨĂĐĞƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐ ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĂĐƚŝŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ĨƌŽŵ ϮϬϮϬͲϮϬϮϰ͕ WŝĐŽ ZŝǀĞƌĂ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĚ Ϯϭ ƉĞŽƉůĞ ŬŝůůĞĚ ŝŶƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ ϭϲϱ ƐĞǀĞƌĞůLJ ŝŶũƵƌĞĚ͕ϱϭϳǁŝƚŚǀŝƐŝďůĞŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚϯϴϴǁŝƚŚĐŽŵƉůĂŝŶƚŽĨƉĂŝŶ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐϲƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐŬŝůůĞĚĂŶĚϳϰ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐŝŶũƵƌĞĚ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐϱϴďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐŝŶũƵƌĞĚ͕ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƵƌŐĞŶƚŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ƐĂĨĞƚLJĂĐƚŝŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐ ƚŽ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶ ĚĂƚĂ ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐ ĨƌŽŵ ϮϬϮϬͲϮϬϮϰ͕ ƵŶƐĂĨĞ ƐƉĞĞĚ ǁĂƐ ƚŚĞ ŵŽƐƚ ĐŽŵŵŽŶ ƉƌŝŵĂƌLJĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶĨĂĐƚŽƌĨŽƌĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŝŶWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ͕ĂĐĐŽƵŶƚŝŶŐĨŽƌϮϲƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨŬŝůůĞĚĂŶĚƐĞǀĞƌĞůLJ ŝŶũƵƌĞĚ ;<^/ͿĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚϯϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨŝŶũƵƌLJĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĨŽůůŽǁĞĚďLJĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂLJǀŝŽůĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚϭϲ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨ<^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚϭϴƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨŝŶũƵƌLJĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ŝŶWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ͕ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐĨƌŽŵϮϬϮϬͲϮϬϮϰƐŚŽǁƐƚŚĂƚďƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐǁĞƌĞƚŚĞŵŽƐƚ ĐŽŵŵŽŶĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƚLJƉĞ͕ĐŽŵƉƌŝƐŝŶŐϯϲƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨ<^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚϯϮƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨŝŶũƵƌLJĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ǁŝƚŚϴϰ ƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨ<^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂŶĚϴϭƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨŝŶũƵƌLJĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ WŽůŝĐLJϱ͘ϮͲϭϱŽĨƚŚĞŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϰͿĚŝƌĞĐƚƐƚŚĞŝƚLJ ƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨĂƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͕ ǁŚĞƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĂŶĚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ƚŽŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨůŽĐĂůƐƚƌĞĞƚƐďLJǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ĂŶĚƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚůŝǀĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨƚŚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ>ŽĐĂůZŽĂĚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϯͿĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞƐ'ŽĂůϲƚŽƐĞƌǀĞĂƐĂŶŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂů ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƚŽǁĂƌĚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨĂƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƚŽĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĚĞĂƚŚƐĂŶĚƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐƵƚŝůŝnjŝŶŐ ďŽƚŚ ƐŽƵŶĚĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ƉƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐĂŶĚĂsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ͕ǁŚŝůĞ KďũĞĐƚŝǀĞ ϰ͘ϰ ĚŝƌĞĐƚƐ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ ƚŽ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂůůLJ ƐĞĞŬ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ƚŽ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ ĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕ ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐĂĨĞƚLJŝƐƐƵĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϮͲϮϬϮϯͿƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂƐŚĂƌĞĚǀŝƐŝŽŶĨŽƌƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ 6 Vision Zero Resolution
ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ďĞŶĞĨŝƚŝŶŐ ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ ďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ǀŝƐŝƚŽƌƐ͕ ĞŶƐƵƌŝŶŐ ƚŚĂƚ ƐĂĨĞƚLJ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚLJƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJŝŶĨŽƌŵĂŶĚĂůŝŐŶǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ^ĂĨĞƚLJĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;^WͿΖƐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƐĂĨĞƚLJ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐtŚŝƚƚŝĞƌŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚsŝƐŝŽŶĂŶĚDƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂůWůĂŶƐ ;ϮϬϮϰͿĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚ'ŽĂůDDͲϭ ƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ^ĂĨĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐĨŽƌůůhƐĞƌƐďLJĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐĂŵŽďŝůŝƚLJŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƚŚĂƚďĂůĂŶĐĞƐĂůůŵŽĚĞƐǁŚŝůĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjŝŶŐ ƐĂĨĞƚLJĨŽƌƚŚĞŵŽƐƚǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞƌŽĂĚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ǁŝƚŚƐĂĨĞƚLJŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚďŝĐLJĐůĞůĂŶĞƐ͕ ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚƐƚƌĞĞƚĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚŚĂƚĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ sŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂhƌďĂŶ'ƌĞĞŶŝŶŐWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϱͿƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐĂƐĂĨĞĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŶĞƚǁŽƌŬ͕ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ŐƌĞĞŶ ƐƚƌĞĞƚ ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ƚŚĂƚ ĐƌĞĂƚĞƐ ƐĂĨĞƌ ĂŶĚ ŵŽƌĞ ůŝǀĂďůĞ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ ĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ^WΖƐ ^ĂĨĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ ĂŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĞƋƵŝƚLJŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂůŝŵĂƚĞĐƚŝŽŶΘĚĂƉƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϱͿŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĐƚŝŽŶd>ϭ͘ϮƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂĐƚŝǀĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ĂĐĐĞƐƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĂĨĞƚLJ ďLJ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŝŶŐ ŐĂƉƐ ŝŶ ƚŚĞ ĂĐƚŝǀĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ŶĞƚǁŽƌŬ͕ ĞdžƉĂŶĚŝŶŐ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ͕ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐƉƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞŐĂƐĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐǁŚŝůĞŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐƐĂĨĞƚLJĨŽƌǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞƌŽĂĚƵƐĞƌƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ;ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJŝŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚͿǁŝůůƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĞdžƉĂŶĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƚLJΖƐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐ͕ĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚ ƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjŝŶŐ ƐĂĨĞƚLJ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƚŚĂƚĂůŝŐŶ ǁŝƚŚĂŶĚ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ƚŚĞ ^WΖƐ ǀŝƐŝŽŶ ĨŽƌ ƐĂĨĞ ŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞZŽƐĞǁŽŽĚŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐ ;ŝŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚͿǁŝůůĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂůƐĂĨĞƚLJ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚŝƐ ŬĞLJĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ͕ĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞ^WΖƐĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐ^ĂĨĞ^LJƐƚĞŵƐŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞtĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶdƌĂŶƐŝƚͲKƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐ WůĂŶ ;ϮϬϭϵͿ ƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐ ĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨĂ ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ͕ ĐŽŵƉĂĐƚ͕ ĂŶĚ ŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂů ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ ǁŝƚŚ ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĚ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ƐĐĂůĞ ĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶ͕ ƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶĞĚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚůŽĐĂůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽƉƚŝŽŶƐƚŚĂƚĂĚǀĂŶĐĞsŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽŐŽĂůƐ ďLJ ĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐǁĂůŬĂďůĞ͕ ďŝŬĞĂďůĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĂƌŽƵŶĚ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ ŶŽĚĞƐĂŶĚ ƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞ ĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐĞ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ^ĂĨĞƚLJĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;^WͿĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨWŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂ ĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬ ĨŽƌ ƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ĚĂƚĂͲĚƌŝǀĞŶ͕ ĞǀŝĚĞŶĐĞͲďĂƐĞĚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƐĞǀĞƌĂů ĨĞĚĞƌĂůĂŶĚƐƚĂƚĞŐƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŽƌƐƚƌŽŶŐůLJĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚŚĞĂĚŽƉƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ sŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ ^ĂĨĞƚLJ ĐƚŝŽŶ WůĂŶƐ ĂƐ ĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ Žƌ ĐŽŵƉĞƚŝƚŝǀĞ ĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞƐ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ĨĞĚĞƌĂů ^ĂĨĞ ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ ĂŶĚ ZŽĂĚƐ ĨŽƌ ůů ;^^ϰͿ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ͕ ƚŚĞ ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ ^ĂĨĞƚLJ /ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWƌŽŐƌĂŵ;,^/WͿǁŚŝĐŚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂ>ŽĐĂůZŽĂĚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJWůĂŶŽƌsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶĂƐ ĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚ ĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ ĨŽƌ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ ĞůŝŐŝďŝůŝƚLJ͕ ĂŶĚ ǀĂƌŝŽƵƐ ŽƚŚĞƌ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ƐĂĨĞƚLJ ĂŶĚ ĂĐƚŝǀĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŐƌĂŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶŝŶŐĐŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚĂĚŽƉƚĞĚsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽďĞƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚůLJŵŽƌĞ ĐŽŵƉĞƚŝƚŝǀĞĨŽƌƚŚĞƐĞĐƌŝƚŝĐĂůƐĂĨĞƚLJĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ŽǀĞƌ ϳϬ ĐŝƚŝĞƐ ĂĐƌŽƐƐ ƚŚĞ hŶŝƚĞĚ ^ƚĂƚĞƐ ŚĂǀĞ ĨŽƌŵĂůůLJ ĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ sŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ Žƌ ĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞŐŽĂů ŽĨ njĞƌŽ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ ĚĞĂƚŚƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞ ŽĨ ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͕ >ŽƐ ŶŐĞůĞƐ ŽƵŶƚLJ͕ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ ŽĨ >ŽƐ ŶŐĞůĞƐ͕ tĞƐƚ ,ŽůůLJǁŽŽĚ͕ ^ĂŶ &ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽ͕ ĂŶĚ ŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐ ŽƚŚĞƌ ũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ ŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝĚĞ͕ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚŝŶŐǁŝĚĞƐƉƌĞĂĚƌĞĐŽŐŶŝƚŝŽŶŽĨsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽĂƐĂůĞĂĚŝŶŐĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĂĐŚŝĞǀŝŶŐ ŵĞĂŶŝŶŐĨƵůƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƐĞƌŝŽƵƐŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕ Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 7
Vision Zero Resolution
t,
Z
^ sŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽŝƐĂƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂůƚŚͲďĂƐĞĚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJƐƚƌĂƚĞŐLJƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĂŶĚĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĚĞĂƚŚƐĂŶĚƐĞƌŝŽƵƐŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐƵƐŝŶŐĂĚĂƚĂͲĚƌŝǀĞŶ͕ ŵƵůƚŝͲĚŝƐĐŝƉůŝŶĂƌLJ͕ ĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƐLJƐƚĞŵƐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŚĂƚ ĂůƐŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐƐĂĨĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ͕ ĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞŵŽďŝůŝƚLJĨŽƌĂůů͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ sŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽ ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ǁŚŝůĞ ŚƵŵĂŶ ĞƌƌŽƌ ǁŝůů ĂůǁĂLJƐ ŽĐĐƵƌ͕ Ă ĐŽŵďŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕ ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ ĐĂŶ ƌĞĚƵĐĞ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ ĨƌŽŵ ĐĂƵƐŝŶŐ ĚĞĂƚŚŽƌ ƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ŽŶĞ ĚĞĂƚŚ Žƌ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌLJ ŽŶ ŝƚLJ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ ŝƐ ŽŶĞ ƚŽŽ ŵĂŶLJ ĂŶĚ ŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚĂů ůĞĂĚĞƌƐŚŝƉ ĂƌĞ ĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚ ƚŽ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚ Ăŝŵ ƚŽ ƌĞĚƵĐĞ ĂŶĚ ĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞ ĚĞĂƚŚƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ ŽŶ ŝƚLJ ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐƌĞĂůĂŶĚƉĞƌĐĞŝǀĞĚƐĂĨĞƚLJĨŽƌƉĞŽƉůĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐŝƐĂŬĞLJƐƚĞƉŝŶĞŶĂďůŝŶŐ more people to choose these clean air modes of transportation that will support the City’s goal of ƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐ ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ ƚŽ ŚĞůƉ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞ ƐƚĂƚĞ͕ ƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů͕ ĂŶĚ ůŽĐĂů Ăŝƌ ƋƵĂůŝƚLJ ĂŶĚ ŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞ ŐĂƐ ĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ ƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶƚĂƌŐĞƚƐ͖ĂŶĚ͕
t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞ &ĞĚĞƌĂů ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ ĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ ŚĂƐ ĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĚ ƚŽ ĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚŝŶŐ ĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ on the nation’s roadways using a dataͲĚƌŝǀĞŶŝŶƚĞƌĚŝƐĐŝƉůŝŶĂƌLJĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚŵŽĚĞůĞĚĂĨƚĞƌsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽ͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐ Ɛŝdž ƉƌŝŶĐŝƉůĞƐ ƚŚĂƚ ĨŽƌŵ ƚŚĞ ďĂƐŝƐ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ^ĂĨĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ͗ ĚĞĂƚŚƐ ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐ ĂƌĞ ƵŶĂĐĐĞƉƚĂďůĞ͕ ŚƵŵĂŶƐ ŵĂŬĞ ŵŝƐƚĂŬĞƐ͕ ŚƵŵĂŶƐ ĂƌĞ ǀƵůŶĞƌĂďůĞ͕ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŝƐƐŚĂƌĞĚ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJŝƐƉƌŽĂĐƚŝǀĞ͕ĂŶĚƌĞĚƵŶĚĂŶĐLJŝƐĐƌƵĐŝĂů͖ĂŶĚ͕ t,
Z
^ sŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽ ĂŝŵƐ ƚŽ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĂŶĚ ŽƉĞƌĂƚĞ ƌŽĂĚƐƚŽ ĐƌĞĂƚĞ Ă ^ĂĨĞ ^LJƐƚĞŵ ďLJ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐ ĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚĂŶĚĂĐƚƵĂůƌŽĂĚƵƐĞĂŶĚƐƉĞĞĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ďLJƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƚŚĞůŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚŽĨ ŚƵŵĂŶĞƌƌŽƌ͕ ĂŶĚďLJƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƚŚĞĐŽŶƐĞƋƵĞŶĐĞƐŽĨĞƌƌŽƌ͘ t,
Z
^ ƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJWůĂŶ;^,^WͿĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞƐƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞŐŽĂůŽĨĂĐŚŝĞǀŝŶŐ njĞƌŽƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƐĞƌŝŽƵƐŝŶũƵƌŝĞƐŽŶƐƚĂƚĞŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐďLJϮϬϱϬ͕ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚCaltrans’s ŝƌĞĐƚŽƌΖƐWŽůŝĐLJ ŽŶZŽĂĚ^ĂĨĞƚLJƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽǀĞŶĞĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͕ĐŽƵŶƚĞƌŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƚŚĞ^ĂĨĞ^LJƐƚĞŵƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ͖ĂŶĚ͕ EKt d,
Z
&KZ

dŚĞ ŝƚLJ ŽĨ WŝĐŽ ZŝǀĞƌĂ ĂĚŽƉƚƐ ĂƐ ƉŽůŝĐLJ ĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ ƚŚĞ ƚĞŶĂŶƚƐ ŽĨ sŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽ ǁŝƚŚ ƚŚĞ ĞdžƉƌĞƐƐĞĚ ŐŽĂů ŽĨ ƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƚŚĞ ŶƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ ĨĂƚĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌLJ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ ĂůŽŶŐ Ăůů ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐ ƵŶĚĞƌ ƚŚĞ ũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶ ŽĨ ƚŚĞ ŝƚLJ ƚŽ njĞƌŽǁŝƚŚŝŶϮϱ LJĞĂƌƐŽĨǁŚĞŶƚŚĞŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ^ĂĨĞƚLJĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ ŝƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͖ĂŶĚ ůůŝƚLJĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͕ůĞĂĚĞƌƐŚŝƉ͕ĂŶĚƐƚĂĨĨĂƌĞ ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞ ĨŽƌƉƌŽĂĐƚŝǀĞůLJĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐ sŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽŝŶĂůůĨĂĐĞƚƐĂŶĚĂƐƉĞĐƚƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƌŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͕ĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĚĞůŝǀĞƌLJ͘ dŚĞ ŝƚLJ DĂŶĂŐĞƌ ŝƐ ŚĞƌĞďLJ ĚŝƌĞĐƚĞĚ ƚŽ͗
ĞǀĞůŽƉ ƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ ĂŶĚ ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ ƚŽ ĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ƚŚĞ ŐŽĂůƐ ĂŶĚ ŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐ ŽĨ sŝƐŝŽŶ ĞƌŽ ĂŶĚ ƚĂŬĞ ĚĂƚĂͲĚƌŝǀĞŶ ĂĐƚŝŽŶƐ ƚŽ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞ njĞƌŽ ĨĂƚĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌLJ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ ďĂƐĞĚ ŽŶ ĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶ ĚĂƚĂ ĂŶĚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŝŶƉƵƚ͕ ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ the “
Ɛ” of engineering, ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ ĂŶĚ ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚ
WƌŽƉŽƐĞĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞĨŝƐĐĂůLJĞĂƌϮϬϮϲͲϮϬϮϳ ďƵĚŐĞƚƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƚŽƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂǀĂŝůĂďŝůŝƚLJŽĨƐƚĂĨĨ ƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͖ĂŶĚ ĚŽƉƚĂŶĚƉƌŽĂĐƚŝǀĞůLJĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚŚĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨWƌŽǀĞŶ^ĂĨĞƚLJŽƵŶƚĞƌŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͖ĂŶĚ ZĞǀŝƐĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ ĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ ĨŽƌ ŶĞǁ ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐĂŶĚĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐ ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐ ƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĂĞƐŝƌĞĚKƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐ^ƉĞĞĚ ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ ĨŽƌ ƚŚĞ ĐŽŶƚĞdžƚ͕ ƚŚĂƚ ĂƌĞ ƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ ĂŶĚ ƐĞůĨͲĞŶĨŽƌĐŝŶŐ Žƌ ƐĞůĨͲĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐ͕ ƚŚĂƚ ĂƌĞ ƌĞĨůĞĐƚŝǀĞ ŽĨƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚĂƚĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞĨŽƌĐŽŶƚĞdžƚͲƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞ͕ƉĞŽƉůĞͲĐĞŶƚƌŝĐĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚŽŚƵŵĂŶƐĐĂůĞ 8 Vision Zero Resolution
ĂŶĚ ƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞ ĚĞƐŝƌĞ ůŝŶĞƐ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ƉĞŽƉůĞͲĐĞŶƚƌŝĐ ŽƌŝŐŝŶƐ ĂŶĚ ĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ĂŶĚ ĂƐƐĞƌƚ ĐŽŶƚĞdžƚͲƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞ͕ ƉĞŽƉůĞͲĐĞŶƚƌŝĐũƵĚŐĞŵĞŶƚŽǀĞƌŶƵŵĞƌŝĐĂůǁĂƌƌĂŶƚƐ͖ĂŶĚ
ZĞǀŝĞǁůĂǁƐ͕ŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐ͕ƌƵůĞƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ƉƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚŝǀĞŽƌĐŽŶƚƌĂƌLJůĂŶŐƵĂŐĞ ĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞŵĞĚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝǀĞ͕ĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚŝǀĞ͕ŽƌůĞŐŝƐůĂƚŝǀĞĂĐƚŝŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ ĞǀĞůŽƉ ĂŶĚ ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶ ĞĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞ ƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ ǁŝƚŚ ŽƚŚĞƌ ĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐ͕ ĞŶƚŝƚŝĞƐ͕ ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ŐƌŽƵƉƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƚĂŬĞŚŽůĚĞƌƐƚŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌsŝƐŝŽŶĞƌŽ͖ĂŶĚ WƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĨŽƌ ŽŶŐŽŝŶŐ ĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞŽƵŶĐŝů ŽŶ Ă ƌĞŐƵůĂƌ ďĂƐŝƐ Ă ƌĞƉŽƌƚ ŽŶ ƚŚĞ ŝŶŝƚŝĂů ĂŶĚ ŽŶŐŽŝŶŐ ƐƚĂƚƵƐ ŽĨ ĂĐŚŝĞǀŝŶŐ ƚŚĞ ŐŽĂů ŽĨ njĞƌŽ ĨĂƚĂů ĂŶĚ ƐĞƌŝŽƵƐ ŝŶũƵƌLJ ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐϮϱLJĞĂƌƐŽĨǁŚĞŶƚŚĞŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ^ĂĨĞƚLJĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶŝƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͘ EKt͕d,
Z
&KZ
͕d,
/dzKhE/>K&d,
/dzK&W/KZ/s
Z ,
Z
z͕
ĨŝŶĚƐ͕ŽƌĚĞƌƐĂŶĚƌĞƐŽůǀĞƐĂƐĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗
ϭ͘ dŚĞĂďŽǀĞƌĞĐŝƚĂůƐĂƌĞƚƌƵĞĂŶĚĐŽƌƌĞĐƚ͘
Ϯ͘ ĚŽƉƚƐZĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶEŽ͘ϮϬϮϲͲͺͺͺͺ
EKt͕d,
Z
&KZ
͕
/dZ
^K>s
 ƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐƌĞƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶŝƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚƉĂƐƐĞĚĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĞĚďLJ WŝĐŽZŝǀĞƌĂ ŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůŽŶƚŚŝƐͺͺ ĚĂLJŽĨDĂLJ ϮϬϮϲ ďLJƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐǀŽƚĞ͗ z
^͗
EK
^͗
^d/E͗
^
Ed͗
dd
^d͗ LJ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ
  DzKZ
ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ /dz>
Z<
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 9

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP)
was developed by the City of Pico Rivera with
funding provided through a Safe Streets and
Roads for All (SS4A) grant awarded by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), which
is a testament to the City’s commitment to
making its streets safer for every resident and
visitor.

The CSAP builds on a strong foundation of prior
planning work, including the Pico Rivera Local
Roadway Safety Plan (2023), the HSIP Cycle 11
and Cycle 12 Grant Applications (2022 and 2024),
and the Final Systemic Safety Analysis Report
(2020). It is further grounded in the Safe System
Approach, the national framework that designs
the transportation system to protect all road
users from fatal and serious injury even when
human error occurs.

Kenner Guerrero (Project Manager)
Aaron Hernandez
Thomas Mericle (City Consultant)
Ruta Jariwala, PE, TE (Project Manager)
Rutvij Patel, EIT
Utsav Domadia, PE
Achal Parikh
Aaditya Patel
Rishi Shah
Luxi Chen
The City of Pico Rivera extends its sincere
gratitude to the regional partner agencies
and community organizations whose
engagement and expertise were indispensable
in shaping this CSAP. The perspectives of
Project Committee members, stakeholders,
and community members across Pico Rivera
ensured that the CSAP reflects the real safety
needs and priorities of all residents, whether
they travel by foot, bicycle, transit, or car.

The City of Pico Rivera is fully committed to
implementing the strategies set forth in this
CSAP and to working in close partnership with
its partner agencies to achieve its central goal:
a measurable and sustained reduction in traffic
fatalities and serious injuries on Pico Rivera’s
streets.

CITY OF PICO RIVERA STAFF CONSULTANT TEAM
10 SS4A ACTION PLAN COMPONENTS
The SS4A grant program defines eight action plan components that are integral to any Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) and must be satisfied to meet its requirements. The table below describes the sections of the City of Pico Rivera CSAP that satisfy each component.

Leadership Commitment and Goal Setting Chapter 1
Planning Structure Chapter 1 and Chapter 8
Safety Analysis Chapter 3
Engagement and Collaboration Chapter 4
Policy and Process Changes Chapter 7
Strategy and Project Selections Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 Progress and Transparency Chapter 8 and City of Pico Rivera Website Action Plan Adoption Date May 12, 2026
Action Plan Components Section
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 11
Glossary
AADT Abbreviation for Average Annual Daily
Traffic: A measure of the average volume of
vehicle traffic on a roadway segment over a full
year, expressed as a daily average.

AB 43 Abbreviation for California Assembly
Bill 43: State legislation signed in 2021 that
grants local jurisdictions new authority to
reduce posted speed limits in designated safety
corridors, business activity districts, and school
zones beyond what was previously permitted
under the Engineering and Traffic Survey
process.

ADA Abbreviation for Americans with
Disabilities Act: Federal civil rights legislation
that requires transportation facilities and
programs to be accessible to individuals with
disabilities.

ATP Abbreviation for Active Transportation
Program: A California state grant program
administered by Caltrans and the California
Transportation Commission that funds
projects encouraging increased use of active
transportation modes, including walking,
bicycling, and Safe Routes to School programs.

Caltrans Abbreviation for California Department
of Transportation: The state agency responsible
for designing, constructing, maintaining, and
operating California’s state highway system.

CHP Abbreviation for California Highway Patrol:

The state law enforcement agency responsible
for maintaining traffic safety on California’s
highway system and for compiling statewide
collision data through the Statewide Integrated
Traffic Records System (SWITRS).

CIP Abbreviation for Capital Improvement
Program: A multi-year planning document that
schedules and budgets public infrastructure
projects.

Collision Severity The intensity of a traffic
collision outcome, classified in California as fatal,
severe injury (KSI), visible injury, or complaint of
pain.

Complete Streets A transportation policy and
design approach that requires streets to be
planned, designed, operated, and maintained
to enable safe, convenient, and comfortable
travel for users of all ages and abilities, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and motor
vehicle operators.

CRF Abbreviation for Crash Reduction Factor:

The estimated percentage reduction in collision
frequency expected from the application of a
specific countermeasure or safety treatment.

CSAP Abbreviation for Comprehensive Safety
Action Plan.

Disadvantaged Communities Census tracts
identified as experiencing transportation and
environmental disadvantage using screening
tools such as CalEnviroScreen.

EMS Abbreviation for Emergency Medical
Services: Pre-hospital medical care and
transport services provided following roadway
collisions.

FHWA Abbreviation for Federal Highway
Administration: The federal agency within the
12 U.S. Department of Transportation responsible
for managing the national highway system and
administering federal-aid highway programs,
including HSIP and SS4A.

GIS Abbreviation for Geographic Information
System: A digital mapping and spatial analysis
platform used to map collision data, identify the
High Injury Network, and support data-driven
safety planning.

HIN Abbreviation for High Injury Network: A
subset of streets within a jurisdiction, typically
a small percentage of total lane miles, that
accounts for a disproportionately large share of
KSI collisions.

HSIP Abbreviation for Highway Safety
Improvement Program: A federal-aid funding
program administered by Caltrans in California
that provides funding for projects that
demonstrably reduce traffic fatalities and
serious injuries on public roads.

KSI Abbreviation for Killed and Severely Injured:

A combined metric representing fatal and
severe injury collisions.

LA Metro Abbreviation for Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority: The
regional transportation planning, funding, and
operations agency for Los Angeles County.

LPI Abbreviation for Leading Pedestrian Interval:

A signal timing strategy that gives pedestrians
a head start before vehicles receive a green
indication, increasing pedestrian visibility and
reducing conflict with turning vehicles.

Measure M The Los Angeles County Traffic
Improvement Plan, a half-cent sales tax
measure approved by voters in 2016 to fund
transportation improvements countywide.

MOE Abbreviation for Measure of Effectiveness:

A quantitative metric used to evaluate the
performance of a transportation project or
safety countermeasure relative to stated goals.

MUTCD Abbreviation for Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices: The national standard
governing the design, installation, and use of
traffic control devices on public roads, including
signs, signals, and pavement markings.

OTS Abbreviation for California Office of Traffic
Safety: A state agency that administers annual
traffic safety grants to eligible public agencies
supporting education, enforcement, and
emergency response programs including DUI
checkpoints, speed enforcement patrols, and
pedestrian and bicycle safety campaigns.

P85 Abbreviation for 85th Percentile Speed: The
speed at or below which 85 percent of vehicles
are traveling on a roadway segment under freeflow conditions.

PDO Abbreviation for Property Damage Only:

A collision in which no persons were injured or
killed, resulting only in damage to vehicles or
property.

PRUSD Abbreviation for Pico Rivera Unified
School District: The local public school district
serving the City of Pico Rivera.

RAISE Grant Abbreviation for Rebuilding
American Infrastructure with Sustainability and
Equity: A U.S. DOT discretionary grant program
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 13
that funds state and local transportation
projects of significant regional or national
impact.

RRFB Abbreviation for Rectangular Rapid
Flashing Beacon: A pedestrian-activated,
high-visibility warning device installed at
uncontrolled crosswalks to alert drivers to
yielding requirements.

Safe System Approach (SSA) A transportation
safety philosophy that acknowledges
human error as inevitable and designs the
transportation system, including roads, speeds,
vehicles, and road users, to absorb those errors
without resulting in death or serious injury.

SB 1 / RMRA Abbreviation for Senate Bill 1 /
Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account:

A California state funding program that provides
formula-based funds for local road maintenance
and rehabilitation.

SCAG Abbreviation for Southern California
Association of Governments: The Metropolitan
Planning Organization (MPO) for the six-county
Southern California region, including Los
Angeles County.

Severity Index A weighted scoring metric
used in the CSAP to rank collision locations by
combining different injury severity levels.

SS4A Abbreviation for Safe Streets and
Roads for All: A federal grant program to help
metropolitan areas, localities, and tribes develop
and implement comprehensive safety action
plans to reduce roadway fatalities and serious
injuries.

STBG Abbreviation for Surface Transportation
Block Grant: A flexible federal-aid program that
funds a broad range of surface transportation
projects, including safety improvements on
roads and bridges.

STEP Abbreviation for Selective Traffic
Enforcement Program: An OTS-funded
enforcement program that funds targeted
traffic enforcement activities including speed
enforcement, DUI patrols, and pedestrian and
bicycle safety operations.

SWITRS Abbreviation for Statewide Integrated
Traffic Records System: The California Highway
Patrol’s statewide database of traffic collision
records.

TIMS Abbreviation for Transportation Injury
Mapping System: An online GIS-based platform
developed by UC Berkeley SafeTREC that
provides public access to SWITRS collision data
with mapping and query capabilities.

Type of Collision A classification of how the
vehicles or road users involved in a collision
came into contact with each other or with other
objects.

USDOT Abbreviation for United States
Department of Transportation: The federal
cabinet agency responsible for national
transportation policy and the administration of
federal transportation grant programs including
HSIP, SS4A, and RAISE.

Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) Pedestrians,
bicyclists, motorcyclists, and others who lack
the structural protection of an enclosed motor
vehicle and are disproportionately at risk of
death or serious injury in a collision. Protecting
VRUs is a primary design objective of the Pico
Rivera CSAP, as pedestrian and bicycle collisions
account for a significant share of KSI outcomes
on the HIN.
14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND
The City of Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP) is a data-driven, communityinformed roadway safety framework developed in alignment with the federal Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) program. The CSAP builds upon the 2023 Local Roadway Safety Plan and expands its scope to incorporate revised detailed collision analysis, broadened stakeholder engagement, and a full spectrum of engineering, behavioral, and policy interventions grounded in the Safe System Approach. The CSAP establishes an incremental, evidence-based path toward reducing all injury collisions, with prioritized focus on killed or severely injured (KSI) outcomes.

COLLISION ANALYSIS
Analysis of five years of collision data (2020–2024) identifies 865 injury collisions citywide, of which 162 (18 percent) were KSI, comprising 20 fatalities and 142 severe injuries. Intersections account for 84 percent of all KSI incidents, and KSI collisions reached their highest single-year count in 2024 with 51 recorded collisions. Unsafe speed is the leading contributing factor (26 percent of citywide KSI), followed by automobile right-of-way violations, improper turning, and traffic signal and sign violations. Broadside collisions are the dominant collision type, and dark conditions with street lighting account for 44 percent of KSI. Pedestrians and bicyclists represent a disproportionately high share of KSI relative to their share of total collisions. California OTS rankings (2022) place Pico Rivera 4th for DUI arrests, 18th for nighttime collisions, and 30th for speed-related collisions among 104 comparable jurisdictions.

Using a weighted severity scoring methodology, the CSAP identifies 12 High Injury Network (HIN) corridors and 10 priority intersections. Rosemead Boulevard is the highest-priority corridor with 42 KSI and 186 injury collisions. Other critical corridors include Whittier Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Paramount Boulevard, Beverly Boulevard, Washington Boulevard, and Passons Boulevard.

The highest-priority intersection, Rosemead Boulevard at Beverly Boulevard, recorded 26 injury collisions and 4 KSI over the study period.

Ten collision profiles characterize the city’s most prevalent collision patterns, covering intersection, nighttime, speed, broadside, rear-end, pedestrian, bicycle, right-of-way, improper turning, and hit-object collisions. Each profile maps collision geography, severity distribution, and contributing factors, and directly informs countermeasure selection and project prioritization.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 15

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Community input was gathered through two virtual public workshops, two Project Committee meetings, a citywide online traffic safety survey, and an interactive web-based map input platform (124 questionnaire responses; 213 categorized map-based comments). Resident concerns, including speeding, red-light running, pedestrian safety gaps, and school zone hazards, closely aligned with HIN findings. The Project Committee, comprising the City Public Works Department, LA County Sheriff (Pico Rivera Station), LA County Fire Department, and LAUSD, provided technical and policy guidance throughout.

COUNTERMEASURES AND SAFETY PROJECTS
The Safe Streets Toolkit (Chapter 5) catalogs engineering, behavioral, and policy countermeasures aligned with FHWA’s Proven Safety Countermeasures framework, organized by collision type and mode with Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) values for benefit-cost analysis. Treatments range from protected left-turn phasing, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), raised medians, and highvisibility crosswalks to speed management strategies, lighting upgrades, Safe Routes to School programming, and enforcement initiatives.

Chapter 6 translates the toolkit into a prioritized capital project pipeline along the HIN, at priority intersections, and at systemic locations citywide. These safety projects include planning-level cost estimates. Primary project categories include signalized and unsignalized intersection improvements, HAWK beacons, school zone safety enhancements, corridor-level active transportation upgrades, and citywide signal timing optimization.

POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION, FUNDING, AND EVALUATION Chapter 7 identifies policy updates required to support sustained safety progress, including traffic engineering standards, speed limit policy under AB 43, and interdepartmental coordination with LA County Sheriff and Fire/EMS. A Non-Infrastructure Actions Matrix specifies education, enforcement, encouragement, and emergency response strategies with lead agencies and timeframes. Chapter 8 establishes a performance monitoring framework tracking annual KSI counts, injury collision rates, and project implementation milestones using TIMS/SWITRS and OTS ranking data, with annual reporting to City Council. A Grant Funding Reference Matrix maps active funding opportunities to project types, including SS4A Implementation Grants, HSIP, ATP Cycle 7, AHSC Cycle 6, OTS, and Measure M Local Return.
16 PICO RIVERA CSAP PROJECT COMMITTEE
The City of Pico Rivera’s CSAP was developed with the guidance and oversight of a multidisciplinary Project Committee representing key municipal, regional, and institutional stakeholders. The committee provided strategic direction throughout the planning process, contributing expertise in public works, transportation engineering, emergency services, and school travel safety to ensure the CSAP reflects the diverse needs of the Pico Rivera community.

Kenner Guerrero City of Pico Rivera, Public Works Department Aaron Hernandez City of Pico Rivera, Public Works Department Thomas Mericle City of Pico Rivera (City Consultant)
Juan Guillen Los Angeles Unified School District
Victoria Cisneros Los Angeles Unified School District
Jay Sartoris LA County Fire Department
Quintin Humphrey LA County Fire Department
Farhad Iranitalab City Engineering Consultant
Jayro Queme Pico Rivera Resident
Representative Agency
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 17

TABLE OF CONTENT
1 INTRODUCTION

EXISTING PLANNING EFFORTS

COLLISION ANALYSIS

ENGAGEMENT & COLLABORATION

SAFE STREETS TOOLKIT

RECOMMENDED SAFETY PROJECTS

POLICY & PROCESS CHANGES

IMPLEMENTATION & FUNDING
2 3
4

Appendix A: Matrix Of Relevant Planning Goals, Objectives & Policies Appendix B: Road Safety Related Projects From Existing Planning Appendix C: Community Outreach And Project Committee Presentations Appendix D: Map Input Public Comments
Appendix E: Analysis Of Traffic Safety Survey
Appendix F: FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures
Appendix G: Preliminary Project Cost Estimates
5 6
7 8
18 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 19
Introduction

CHAPTER ONE
20 Pico Rivera is a vibrant and diverse city located
in the Southeast region of Los Angeles County.

According to the 2020 US Census, Pico Rivera
has a population of 62,088 residents within its
approximately nine square mile incorporated
area. The City has a rich cultural history as a
predominantly Hispanic community and has
long served as a hub of opportunity, with major
employment and industrial activity driven
by its strategic proximity to downtown Los
Angeles and position at the center of Southern
California’s regional freeway network.

Pico Rivera’s transportation network is defined
by its location at the nexus of three major
state and interstate highways: the Santa
Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) to the south, the
San Gabriel River Freeway (Interstate 605)
to the east, and the Pomona Freeway (State
Route 60) approximately two miles to the
north. While these major highways provide
excellent regional connectivity and access to
the broader Los Angeles basin, they also bring
significant challenges, including substantial
vehicle emissions that contribute to poor air
quality. These environmental impacts have
led to the state designating Pico Rivera as
a “Disadvantaged Community” due to the
disproportionate burden on air quality and
public health faced by residents.

The City’s roadway network is characterized by
high east-west travel volumes and significant
freight traffic traversing major arterial roadways
including Rosemead Boulevard, Whittier
Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Paramount
Boulevard, and Washington Boulevard. Multiple
rail lines also cross through the City. Public
transportation is provided by the Los Angeles
County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
and local bus services, though transit utilization
remains relatively low citywide.

Pico Rivera
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 21
Managing high-volume traffic on major
arterial corridors that serve both local &
regional travel demands
Mitigating the impacts of heavy freight &
commercial vehicle traffic on local streets
Protecting vulnerable road users, particularly
pedestrians & bicyclists, on busy streets with
heavy vehicle traffic
Creating functional bicycle & pedestrian
networks in a community historically
dominated by automobile travel
Addressing safety concerns at high-risk
intersections throughout the City, which
account for 81 percent of injury collisions
Addressing the disproportionate safety burden
on disadvantaged communities near major
transportation corridors
Managing seasonal traffic fluctuations and
peak-hour congestion that exacerbate
safety risks
Ensuring safe access across major highways
& arterials to schools, parks, medical facilities,
commercial districts, and residential
neighborhoods
Key transportation safety challenges in Pico
Rivera include:

The City of Pico Rivera envisions a future where
all residents, workers, and visitors can travel
safely throughout the community regardless of
age, ability, income, or mode of transportation.

Through systematic improvements to
infrastructure, operations, education, and
enforcement, the City is committed to
eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries
on all roadways within Pico Rivera. This vision
ensures that safety improvements prioritize
the needs of disadvantaged communities
and vulnerable road users while creating
a transportation network that enhances
community health, economic vitality, and
quality of life for all.

VISION STATEMENT

GOALS OF CSAP
Prioritize safety over speed and convenience
in all transportation planning, design, and
operational decisions. Safety should be the
foremost consideration when evaluating tradeoffs in street design, traffic operations, and mobility improvements.
1 22
Foster a culture of traffic safety through
community engagement, public education,
and transparent communication about
safety challenges and solutions. Building
public awareness and support is essential to
changing behaviors and sustaining safety
improvements over time.

Build institutional capacity and commitment
to traffic safety across all City departments.

DStaff training, interdepartmental coordination,
and dedicated resources will ensure that safety
considerations are integrated into all relevant City
operations and decision-making processes.

Expand safe, accessible, and connected
infrastructure for people walking, cycling, using
mobility devices, and taking transit. High-quality
facilities for all modes will provide safer alternatives to driving and reduce overall collision exposure.

Establish clear accountability through regular
monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of safety
outcomes and implementation progress. Annual
reporting will track collision trends, measure
progress toward goals, and identify opportunities
to adjust strategies based on results.

Use both collision data and proactive risk
assessment to identify high-priority locations
and systemic safety needs. The City will
respond to demonstrated collision patterns
while also addressing locations with high-risk
characteristics before serious crashes occur.
4 7
Design and operate streets with appropriate
speeds that match the context and function
of each roadway and protect vulnerable users.

Speed management strategies, including
infrastructure design and traffic calming, will be
implemented to reduce the likelihood and severity
of collisions.
5 8
6 9
Implement a Safe Systems Approach
that integrates engineering, education,
enforcement, emergency response, and
policy to create multiple layers of protection
for all road users. Recognizing that no single
intervention can eliminate traffic deaths
and serious injuries, the City will coordinate
complementary strategies across all disciplines.
3 Address traffic safety disparities by focusing
resources and interventions in communities
disproportionately affected by traffic collisions.

Data-driven analysis will identify areas with higher
collisions and guide proportional distribution of
safety improvements.
2 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 23

LEADERSHIP COMMITMENT & GOAL SETTING
The City of Pico Rivera is firmly committed
to improving safety across its transportation
network and aligning with the statewide Vision
Zero goals championed by Caltrans and Los
Angeles County. Through developing this
CSAP, the City demonstrates its dedication to
addressing traffic fatalities and serious injuries
through data-driven approach that prioritize the
needs of all community members.

The City Council has provided strong direction
for the development of ambitious safety targets
that will guide Pico Rivera’s transportation safety
initiatives in the coming years. These targets are
being established through careful analysis of
historical collision data, consideration of regional
benchmarks, and extensive consultation with
stakeholders and community members. With a
clear recognition of the urgent need to reduce
traffic fatalities and serious injuries, the City
has set an ambitious but achievable goal: to
eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries
on City streets within 25 years of the CSAP’s
adoption.

The City has committed necessary resources to
support these initiatives, including dedicated
funding in the annual Capital Improvement
Program budget for safety improvements and
active pursuit of state and federal safety grants.

Progress monitoring and accountability
are central to this commitment. The City
will implement annual tracking of safety
performance metrics, conduct regular
evaluations of implemented measures, and
engage with the community to gather feedback
on safety initiatives. A CSAP Project Committee
will provide ongoing oversight and strategic
direction, ensuring that safety remains a
primary consideration in all transportation
decisions and that the plan evolves to address
emerging challenges and opportunities.

Through this coordinated approach and
dedication of resources, the City of Pico
Rivera demonstrates its resolve to create a
transportation system where all users can
travel safely, regardless of their mode of
transportation, age, ability, or socioeconomic
status.
24 This chapter introduces the City of Pico Rivera
and establishes the fundamental need for the
CSAP, along with its strategic objectives and vision.

It demonstrates City leadership’s dedication to
improving road safety and presents the forwardlooking vision for implementing the CSAP.

Additionally, this chapter outlines the CSAP’s
comprehensive scope, articulates the vision and goals
that will guide safety planning efforts, and details the methodological approach taken in its development.

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
This chapter examines the City of Pico Rivera’s
existing transportation planning efforts and
partnerships with regional agencies that have laid
the foundation for the CSAP. It reviews significant
transportation initiatives, including past plans,
implemented programs, completed projects, and
inter-agency partnerships that have influenced
and defined the City’s current safety priorities
and strategic approach. Key documents reviewed
include the Local Roadway Safety Plan, General Plan
Circulation Element, Multimodal Corridor Plans,
Urban Greening Plan, and regional plans from LA
County Metro and Caltrans.

This chapter summarizes the stakeholder
and community engagement process that
informed the CSAP. Input was collected through
an interactive map survey, workshops, and
coordination with the Project Committee,
involving local officials, law enforcement,
advocates, schools, and residents. This inclusive
approach ensures the CSAP reflects diverse
perspectives and transportation needs. It also
documents how feedback was synthesized to
shape project priorities and recommendations.

Particular emphasis is placed on addressing
the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable
communities.

CHAPTER 2: EXISTING PLANNING

EFFORTS
CHAPTER 4: ENGAGEMENT &

COLLABORATION

ORGANIZATION OF CSAP
This chapter presents a comprehensive analysis
of collision statistics for Pico Rivera from Jaunuary
2020 through December 2024. It examines collision
trends by severity, location type, and time of day,
road user type, and contributing factors. The chapter
identifies and analyzes the High Injury Network
within the City, including the 11 priority corridors
and 15 priority intersection that experience the
highest concentrations of fatal and severe injury
collisions. Multiple collision profiles are presented
detailing collision patterns, vulnerable user groups,
and evolving trends over time that inform the
development of targeted safety countermeasures.

CHAPTER 3: Collision Analysis
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 25
This chapter identifies and prioritizes specific safety projects derived from the analysis conducted in
previous chapters. Projects are categorized into
two categories: Systemic Projects and Design
Projects. Each project includes description, location,
recommended countermeasures and estimated
costs.. The prioritization methodology considers
collision frequency and severity, vulnerable
user exposure, disadvantaged area impact,
implementation feasibility, and community input and
support.

This chapter presents a comprehensive strategy
for implementing the safety improvements and
recommendations identified in this CSAP. It
establishes a framework for monitoring the CSAP’s
progress, evaluating the effectiveness of implemented
countermeasures, and adapting strategies as needed
based on performance data and emerging best
practices. The chapter also explores potential funding
sources, including federal programs, state grants,
regional funding opportunities, and local financing
mechanisms to support project implementation and
ensure the successful realization of the CSAP’s safety
goals.

CHAPTER 6: RECOMMENDED SAFETY

PROJECTS
CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION &

FUNDING
This chapter presents the comprehensive Safe Streets
Toolkit developed as part of the CSAP. This toolkit
outlines a diverse range of engineering, education,
and enforcement countermeasures that can be
applied to address the specific safety challenges
identified across the transportation network. The
toolkit incorporates proven treatments from national
best practices, California guidance documents,
and Federal Highway Administration resources.

It will serve as a valuable resource to guide the
implementation of targeted interventions and assist
in the selection of appropriate safety improvements
for different contexts, users, and collision types.

This chapter identifies policy and process
modifications that the City of Pico Rivera can
adopt to institutionalize safe streets principles
across municipal operations. It examines existing
ordinances, design standards, and internal
procedures to identify gaps that may contribute to
traffic fatalities and serious injuries. Recommended
changes include updates to speed management
policies, complete streets requirements for capital
projects, and enhanced coordination protocols with
LA County Sheriff and Caltrans. The chapter also
outlines how these policy shifts align with California
state law and SS4A program requirements, providing
a foundation for sustained, citywide safety progress
beyond individual infrastructure improvements.

CHAPTER 5: SAFE STREETS TOOLKIT CHAPTER 7: POLICY & PROCESS

CHANGES
26 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 27
Existing Plans,
Policies & Programs

CHAPTER TWO
28 City Plan
Infrastructure Projects
County Plans
Regional/Sub-Regional Plans

INTRODUCTION
This chapter summarizes the existing plans, policies, projects underway, and programs reviewed for the City of Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan (CSAP). The purpose of this effort is to ensure the CSAP vision, goals, and Safe Systems strategies are aligned with prior planning efforts, planned transportation projects, and community safety programs for the City. The documents reviewed are organized by category as below:

The following sections include brief descriptions of these documents and how they inform the development of the CSAP. A detailed list of goals, objectives and relevant policies from the reviewed information is listed in Appendix A, while a list of road safety related improvements and projects is listed in Appendix B.

1. Pico Rivera Climate Action & Adaptation Plan (2025)

2. Pico Rivera Five-Year Capital Improvement Program | FY 2025-2030 and Biennial Budget FY 2025-2027

3. Pico Rivera HSIP Cycle 12 Grant Applications (2024)

4. Historic Whittier Blvd Multimodal Plan (2024)

5. Pico Rivera Local Roadway Safety Plan (2023)

6. City of Pico Rivera Strategic Plan (2022-2023)

7. Historic Whittier Boulevard Revitalization Program Specific Plan and Multimodal Plan (2022)

8. Pico Rivera HSIP Cycle 11 Grant Applications (2022)

9. City of Pico Rivera Final Systemic Safety Analysis Report (2020)

10. Citywide Parking Analysis (2019)

11. Washington Boulevard Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan (2019)

12. Lakewood/Rosemead Boulevard Master Plan and Complete Street Evaluation (2018)

13. Pico Rivera Safe Routes to School Program and Walk Audit Report (2013–2015)

14. Pico Rivera Urban Greening Plan (2015)

15. Pico Rivera General Plan | Circulation Element (2014)

1. Washington Boulevard Bridge Over Rio Hondo Channel (2022)

2. Telegraph Road Over San Gabriel River Bridge (2021)

1. LA County A Plan for Safer Roadways | Vision Zero (2020-2025)

2. LA County Long Range Transportation Plan | LRTP (2020)

3. LA County Bicycle Master Plan | Final Plan (2012)

4. LA County Traffic Improvement Plan (2008)

1. Metro Eastside Gold Line Project (2022)

2. High Speed Rail Phase II (2021)

3. Gold Line East Side Extension Transit Oriented Development Plan (2017)

4. Gateway Cities Strategic Transportation Plan (2016)
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 29
PICO RIVERA CLIMATE ACTION & ADAPTATION PLAN (2025)
PICO RIVERA HSIP CYCLE 12 GRANT APPLICATIONS (2024)
The City of Pico Rivera submitted two Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) grant applications in September 2024, representing the most current implementation of data-driven safety strategies identified in prior planning efforts. Application 1 focuses on Traffic Signal and Median Safety Improvements at eleven signalized intersections citywide and one roadway segment along Paramount Boulevard. Proposed improvements include installation of protected left-turn phases, conversion from pedestal-mounted to mast arm signal configurations, enhanced striping through intersections, and installation of raised medians to reduce head-on collisions. Application 2 addresses School

CITY PLAN
Pedestrian Crossing Safety Enhancements at eight school crossing locations to improve crossing signage, enhanced striping, installation of rectangular rapid flashing beacons, LED-enhanced signage, and ADA accessibility improvements such as curb ramps.

For the CSAP, these applications illustrate how systematic safety analysis leads to targeted interventions at high-priority locations, the importance of cost-benefit analysis in prioritizing safety investments, and the City’s ongoing commitment to securing federal funding for comprehensive safety improvements that protect vulnerable road users, particularly children in school zones and drivers at high-crash intersections.

The Pico Rivera Climate Action & Adaptation Plan serves as the City’s comprehensive roadmap to achieve a resilient, sustainable future for all residents. The plan establishes ambitious emissions reduction targets aligned with state goals of 40% reduction by 2030, 75% by 2040, and complete transition to net-zero emissions by 2045. The plan charts a course to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions to effectively zero while fostering a resilient and thriving community. Transportation represents the largest emissions source at 52% of total community emissions, followed by buildings and energy at 33%. The plan addresses both mitigation through direct greenhouse gas emissions reduction and adaptation through climate resilience strategies that protect and build resilience in vulnerable systems and communities.

This plan supports the Comprehensive Safety Action Plan through its integrated approach to sustainable transportation and community resilience. The plan’s transportation and land use focus area specifically emphasizes accessible, active transportation systems and social networks that connect Pico Rivera communities. The plan’s emphasis on Complete Streets and Livable Streets principles, bike facilities, and pedestrian infrastructure creates direct synergies with CSAP’s comprehensive safety approach. 30 PICO RIVERA FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
| FY 2025-2030 AND BIENNIAL BUDGET FY 2025-2027
HISTORIC WHITTIER BLVD MULTIMODAL PLAN (2024)
The City of Pico Rivera’s latest Capital Improvement Program establishes a comprehensive five-year fiscal planning framework totaling $203.4 million for fiscal years 2025 through 2030, with an additional Biennial Budget totaling $162 million in revenues for FY 2025-26 and $167 million for FY 2026-27. The program encompasses broad infrastructure categories including streets, bridges, parks, water systems, sanitary sewer, City buildings, ADA improvements, and other large-scale capital projects, with $119.6 million representing funds carried over from FY 2024-25. The CIP is funded through diverse sources including Proposition C, Measure R, Measure M, SB-1, federal and state grants, and various restricted funds, demonstrating the City’s comprehensive The Historic Whittier Blvd Multimodal Plan represents a comprehensive approach that includes both the Vision Plan and Multimodal Plan, developed concurrently to integrate land use, economic development, and mobility needs under one unifying vision. The Vision Plan addresses near- and long-term multi-disciplinary community needs including sustainable development, climate resilience, and environmental justice, approach to infrastructure investment while prioritizing projects that affect public health and safety.

The substantial investment in transportation and infrastructure projects provides critical implementation opportunities for CSAP safety strategies, with specific allocation of $52.8 million for streets projects and $4.6 million for traffic projects over the five-year period directly supporting CSAP implementation. The program’s systematic approach to capital planning offers a comprehensive framework for integrating safety improvements with broader infrastructure investments, while the emphasis on completing existing projects ensures that safety-related infrastructure improvements move from planning to implementation, demonstrating the City’s ongoing financial commitment to community safety improvements.
while the Multimodal Plan provides detailed transportation and mobility strategies. Together, they encompass multimodal transportation networks, protected bicycle infrastructure, transit amenities, vehicle accommodations, open space planning, and comprehensive streetscape improvements while prioritizing vulnerable road users.

These integrated plans serve as critical implementation documents for the CSAP’s comprehensive safety approach, providing detailed design standards, community engagement methodologies, and proven strategies for creating Safe Systems infrastructure that protects all road users.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 31
The Pico Rivera Local Roadway Safety Action Plan (LRSP) provides a systematic data-driven approach to identifying roadway safety issues and developing targeted countermeasures to reduce fatal and seriously injured (KSI) collisions. The LRSP analyzed collision data from 2017-2021, identified high-risk locations, and developed emphasis areas focused on unsafe speed, improper turning, automobile right of way, traffic signal and sign violations, and driving under the influence. The LRSP provides engineering countermeasures, cost estimates, and implementation strategies for priority safety projects throughout the city.

The LRSP serves as a critical foundation document for the CSAP, The Historic Whittier Boulevard Revitalization Program includes both a specific plan for land use and development along the corridor and a multimodal transportation plan that addresses the needs of all users. The plan recognizes Whittier Boulevard’s role as both a historic main street and a major arterial corridor, requiring balanced solutions that enhance economic vitality while improving safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists. Proposed improvements include traffic calming measures, enhanced crosswalks, bicycle facilities, and streetscape enhancements that create a more welcoming environment for all users.

PICO RIVERA LOCAL ROADWAY SAFETY PLAN (2023)

HISTORIC WHITTIER BOULEVARD REVITALIZATION
PROGRAM SPECIFIC PLAN AND MULTIMODAL PLAN (2022)
providing detailed collision analysis, proven countermeasures, and implementation roadmaps that directly support the CSAP’s goals. The CSAP builds upon the LRSP’s data-driven approach while expanding the scope to include comprehensive community safety, enhanced equity analysis, and broader stakeholder and public engagement consistent with the Safe Streets and Roads for All program requirements.

This comprehensive revitalization program demonstrates how transportation safety improvements can be integrated with economic development and historic preservation goals.

The multimodal focus and emphasis on creating a pedestrian-friendly environment along a major arterial directly supports the CSAP’s Safe Systems approach and provides strategies for transforming high-volume corridors into safer, more livable community assets that serve both local residents and regional travelers.
32 The fundamental components of the Strategic Plan include a mission, vision, and values statements, and concise goals, strategies, and actions. It also includes shared vision of transportation and warehousing, educational services, healthcare and social assistance.

The plan includes providing city services, stewardship resources, and encouraging infrastructure improvements benefiting residents, businesses, and visitors. The plan includes data collected from the public outreach and engagement strategies in order develop the strategic plan. The improvements identified in this plan will inform the safety improvements and connectivity strategies to be recommended in the City’s CSAP.

CITY OF PICO RIVERA STRATEGIC PLAN (2022-2023)
The City of Pico Rivera’s Urban Greening Plan (UGP) presents projects that provide a safe and connected bicycle network and pedestrian improvements, creates a unifying street tree canopy for more walkable and bikeable neighborhoods, and identifies prospective green spaces and hydrology improvements. The Urban Greening Plan establishes a system of green streets by incorporating walking, biking, storm water management, and street trees within Pico Rivera’s streets. Additionally, the plan provides recommendations on how to successfully implement and maintain these green streets. The City has experienced the PICO RIVERA URBAN GREENING PLAN (2015)
cumulative impacts of environmental, social, and economic vulnerabilities that affect quality of life and the built environment. This plan addresses many of these issues by providing a safe and connected multi-modal transportation system, unifying street tree palette, and opportunities for storm water management.

The Urban Greening Plan’s holistic approach to creating safer, more livable streets through environmental improvements directly supports the CSAP’s Safe Systems approach and equity objectives.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 33
The Pico Rivera Final Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) analyzes collision data, assesses infrastructure deficiencies through an inventory of roadway system elements, and identifies roadway safety solutions on a Citywide basis. The SSAR includes collision data source and analysis techniques, collision patterns within the City, collision data analysis, field investigation, proposed safety countermeasures, safety improvement projects, and collision reduction benefits, cost estimation, prioritization of safety projects, and recommended projects for HSIP Cycle 10. The SSAR focused on analysis of four principal corridors within the City: Whittier Boulevard, Passons Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, and Paramount Boulevard.

The Citywide Parking Analysis evaluates parking supply and demand throughout Pico Rivera and provides recommendations for parking management strategies that support economic development while encouraging alternative transportation modes. The analysis considers how parking policies can be used to encourage walking, cycling, and transit use while ensuring adequate access for residents, workers, and visitors.

The parking analysis informs the CSAP’s approach to managing parking as a tool for promoting safer transportation behaviors.

Appropriate parking management can reduce vehicle miles traveled, encourage active transportation, and create opportunities for streetscape improvements that enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety while supporting local economic development and community vitality.

CITY OF PICO RIVERA FINAL SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS
REPORT (2020)
CITYWIDE PARKING ANALYSIS (2019)
The SSAR provides foundational data and corridor-specific insights that directly inform the CSAP’s approach to identifying high-risk locations and developing targeted countermeasures. 34 WASHINGTON BOULEVARD TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT SPECIFIC PLAN (2019)
The Washington Boulevard Transit Oriented Development Specific Plan establishes planning and design guidelines for transit-oriented development along the Washington Boulevard corridor in anticipation of improved transit service. The plan promotes higher density, mixed-use development patterns that support transit ridership while creating walkable, bikeable communities. Design standards emphasize pedestrian and bicycle safety, traffic calming measures, and creating active street environments that support economic development and community interaction.

This specific plan’s focus on creating pedestrian and bicycle-friendly environments around transit nodes directly supports the CSAP’s goals of promoting safe active transportation. The plan’s integrated approach to land use and transportation planning provides a model for implementing Safe Systems principles at the neighborhood scale and advancing transportation equity by improving access to transit and active transportation options.

The Safe Routes to School program includes comprehensive goals to support traveling to school by active modes and to improve traffic safety for children who walk and bike to school. The plan outlines strategies, including SRTS Coordinator and Task Force development, educational and encouragement programs, evaluation programs, and enforcement programs, as well as engineering improvements to expand the bike and walkable routes network and improve connectivity throughout the City.

Complementing the SRTS Program, the City conducted Walk Audits at ten Pico Rivera schools, evaluating walking and bicycling conditions near each campus to identify safety deficiencies and infrastructure opportunities. Recommendations span engineering improvements

PICO RIVERA SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM
AND WALK AUDIT REPORT (2013–2015)
in the City right-of-way and on school district property, as well as Education, Encouragement, Enforcement, and Evaluation programs tailored to each school. The City committed to incorporating these findings into Capital Improvement Program projects and future grant applications.

The Safe Routes to School program’s comprehensive approach to child pedestrian and bicycle safety provides a proven framework for the CSAP’s community engagement and education strategies. The program’s emphasis on protecting vulnerable users, particularly children, aligns with Safe Systems principles and demonstrates effective coordination between education, engineering, and enforcement strategies that can be scaled to address broader community safety challenges throughout Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 35

LAKEWOOD/ROSEMEAD BOULEVARD MASTER PLAN
AND COMPLETE STREET EVALUATION (2018)
This master plan and complete street evaluation focuses on major arterial corridors that serve as critical connections within Pico Rivera and to adjacent communities. The plan evaluates opportunities to implement complete street design principles that accommodate all users including pedestrians, cyclists, transit riders, and motorists while maintaining traffic flow and access for adjacent land uses. The evaluation includes assessment of existing conditions, stakeholder input, and recommendations for infrastructure improvements that enhance safety and mobility for all users.

The complete streets approach embodied in this plan directly supports the CSAP’s Safe Systems framework by prioritizing design solutions that protect all road users. The plan’s corridor-specific focus provides implementation strategies for key routes identified in the CSAP’s high injury network analysis.

The Pico Rivera General Plan Circulation Element identifies safe, reliable and accessible transportation needs, through policies and standards to enhance its design and maintenance of an integrated multimodal transportation system. The element sets forth provisions for a multimodal transportation system, including existing and future roadways and intersections, pedestrian and bicycle paths, public transit, and parking facilities. An analysis of the existing transportation system is included in the element, as well as a set of policies to guide the development of Pico Rivera’s transportation system. These goals and policies inform City’s transportation PICO RIVERA GENERAL PLAN | CIRCULATION
ELEMENT (2014)
planning to improve safety for active transportation users while encouraging users to choose walking, bicycling, and transit as a mode of transportation in Pico Rivera to reduce traffic trips and improve environmental quality.

The Circulation Element’s emphasis on multimodal transportation and active transportation safety directly supports the CSAP’s comprehensive approach to community safety. 36 The City of Pico Rivera submitted three HSIP grant applications for Cycle 11 in September 2022, demonstrating the City’s sustained commitment to pursuing federal funding for systematic safety improvements across multiple infrastructure categories. Application 1 focused on conducting a comprehensive roadway safety and signing audit (RSSA) covering all streets and roadways throughout the City of Pico Rivera, encompassing 144 miles of roadway to implement a roadway sign replacement project based on systematic safety analysis results. Application 2 addressed signal hardware improvements at 47 signalized intersections along multiple roadway segments within the City, proposing enhanced signal lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, improved mounting systems, and installation of pedestrian countdown signal heads to PICO RIVERA HSIP CYCLE 11 GRANT APPLICATIONS (2022)
increase visibility and safety for all road users. Application 3 concentrated on school crossing safety enhancement projects targeting 18 pedestrian school crossings at 12 schools throughout the City for improved crossing signage, installation of rectangular rapid flashing beacons, LED-enhanced signage, and advanced limit line striping.

For the CSAP, these applications provide valuable context for understanding the City’s historical commitment to data-driven safety planning and illustrate the evolution of safety strategies from systematic audits and signal improvements to the more recent focus on intersection-specific countermeasures and school zone protection seen in subsequent grant cycles.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 37
The Washington Boulevard Bridge project over Rio Hondo Channel provides another example of major infrastructure investment that incorporates multimodal safety considerations. The bridge design addresses the needs of pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists while crossing a significant geographic feature that could otherwise create barriers to safe community connectivity.

This infrastructure project supports the CSAP’s comprehensive safety approach by ensuring that major regional connections accommodate all users safely and maintain network connectivity for active transportation.

The project demonstrates how significant capital investments can advance Vision Zero goals while serving broader regional mobility needs.

The Telegraph Road Bridge project addresses a critical regional connection while incorporating design features that enhance safety for all users. The bridge replacement or rehabilitation includes consideration of pedestrian and bicycle facilities, improved sight lines, and design elements that reduce conflict points and support safe travel across this major river crossing.

This regional infrastructure project demonstrates opportunities to incorporate Safe Systems principles into major capital investments.

The bridge improvements support the CSAP’s goals by ensuring safe passage for all users across a significant geographic barrier and maintaining critical connections between Pico Rivera and adjacent communities while enhancing overall network safety.

INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

WASHINGTON BOULEVARD BRIDGE OVER RIO HONDO
CHANNEL (2022)

TELEGRAPH ROAD OVER SAN GABRIEL RIVER
BRIDGE (2021)
38 COUNTY PLANS
The LA County Vision Zero Plan is a five-year plan focusing on achieving the goals of eliminating traffic-related fatalities on unincorporated County roadways by 2035. The plan includes elements which will reduce severe injuries and traffic collisions in the long term. The plan identifies vision for the future objectives and actions to enhance traffic safety in collaboration with government and community partners. The plan also includes LA COUNTY A PLAN FOR SAFER ROADWAYS | VISION
ZERO (2020-2025)
health equity, data-driven process, and transparency regulating several goals and objectives. The plan describes potential findings for pedestrian and bicycle safety and countermeasures to reduce collisions and traffic congestion.

The County’s Vision Zero Plan provides the regional policy framework that directly informs and complements Pico Rivera’s CSAP objectives. The plan’s emphasis on health equity, data-driven decision making, and eliminating traffic fatalities aligns with the CSAP’s goals and provides opportunities for coordinated implementation strategies, shared resources, and consistent messaging about the importance of traffic safety as a public health priority across the region.

The LA County Traffic Improvement Plan includes comprehensive goals to improve transportation and ease traffic congestion through improved freeway traffic flow, expand the rail and rapid transit system, repave local streets, repair potholes, synchronize signals, keep the transit and highway system safe, make public transportation more accessible, convenient and affordable, and invest in transportation infrastructure.

While focused primarily on traffic operations and congestion reduction, this plan’s emphasis on system safety and accessibility provides foundational support for the CSAP’s comprehensive approach to transportation safety.

LA COUNTY TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT PLAN (2008)
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 39
The LA County Long Range Transportation Plan provides the regional framework for transportation investment and policy over the next several decades. The plan includes safety goals, performance measures, and investment strategies that influence local transportation planning and funding opportunities. The LRTP’s emphasis on multimodal transportation, greenhouse gas reduction, and transportation equity provides context for local safety planning efforts.

The regional transportation plan’s safety goals and performance measures provide benchmarks for evaluating CSAP effectiveness and ensuring local efforts contribute to regional safety objectives. The plan’s funding frameworks and project prioritization criteria inform

LA COUNTY LONG RANGE
TRANSPORTATION PLAN | LRTP (2020)
implementation strategies for CSAP recommendations and provide opportunities for leveraging regional resources to advance local safety goals.

The LA County Bicycle Master Plan establishes a countywide vision for bicycle transportation including facility design standards, network connectivity goals, and implementation strategies. The plan provides technical guidance for bicycle facility design and presents a regional framework for coordinating local bicycle planning efforts to create seamless networks that cross jurisdictional boundaries.

The regional bicycle plan’s design standards and network vision directly support the CSAP’s active transportation safety goals by providing proven design solutions and regional coordination frameworks.

The plan’s emphasis on creating low-stress bicycle networks that accommodate riders of all ages and abilities aligns with Safe Systems LA COUNTY BICYCLE MASTER PLAN | FINAL PLAN (2012)
principles and supports the CSAP’s commitment to transportation equity and Vision Zero objectives.
40 The High Speed Rail Phase II project represents a long-term regional transportation investment that may influence future land use and transportation patterns in Pico Rivera and the broader Gateway Cities region. While still in planning phases, the project’s potential impacts on local transportation networks and development patterns require consideration in long-term safety planning.

This regional mega-project provides opportunities to coordinate local safety improvements with major infrastructure investments and ensure that community safety goals are integrated with regional transportation planning. The CSAP’s long-term vision must account for potential changes in travel patterns and development pressures associated with major regional projects while maintaining focus on local community safety priorities.

HIGH SPEED RAIL PHASE II (2021)
The Gold Line East Side Extension Transit Oriented Development Plan establishes a framework for coordinated land use and transportation planning around future or enhanced transit service. The plan promotes development patterns that support transit ridership while creating safe, walkable, and bikeable environments around transit stations. Design guidelines emphasize first-and-last-mile connections, pedestrian and bicycle safety, and creating vibrant mixed-use communities that reduce dependence on automobile travel.

This transit-oriented development plan supports the CSAP’s transportation equity goals by improving access to regional transit service and creating opportunities for car-free or car-light lifestyles.

GOLD LINE EAST SIDE EXTENSION TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT PLAN (2017)
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 41
The Metro Eastside Gold Line Project represents a significant regional transit investment that enhances transportation options for Pico Rivera residents and workers. The project includes station improvements, enhanced first-and-last-mile connections, and safety enhancements that support increased transit ridership and reduced automobile dependence.

METRO EASTSIDE GOLD LINE PROJECT (2022)
This regional transit investment directly supports the CSAP’s transportation equity goals by improving access to jobs, services, and opportunities throughout the metropolitan region. Enhanced transit service provides alternatives to automobile travel that can reduce overall vehicle miles traveled and exposure to traffic conflicts, supporting Vision Zero objectives while improving mobility options for community members.

The Strategic Transportation Plan (STP) includes studies to improve the complex transportation network within the Gateway Cities of LA County.

The STP encompasses all modes of surface transportation in the Gateway Cities, including local and regional arterial highways, freeways, local and regional transit, park and ride lots, and active transportation. This plan uses new, state-of-the-art multimodal modeling and analysis to develop a strategic plan for sub regional travel throughout the Gateway Cities and connecting to the Southern California region. The plan has been developed through a collaborative process that included significant input, review and approval of all of the jurisdictions throughout

GATEWAY CITIES STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION
PLAN (2016)
the process. The primary objectives of the Gateway Cities Council of Governments (GCCOG) is coordination of transportation infrastructure among its member agencies, neighboring jurisdictions and other regional agencies including the LA County Metro.

The plan’s collaborative governance model provides valuable insights for stakeholder engagement and ensures CSAP strategies are coordinated with regional transportation safety initiatives to maximize effectiveness and avoid conflicting approaches at jurisdictional boundaries. 42 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 43
Collision Analysis

CHAPTER FOUR
44 Collision data for the City of Pico Rivera was obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) and the Pico Rivera Police Department, with the police department reports providing additional collision details. This comprehensive collision dataset covers a five-year period from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2024. Both datasets were combined, and common collisions were removed, creating a consolidated dataset that serves as the foundation for all subsequent safety analysis.

The Pico Rivera CSAP is built on a foundation of data-driven analysis to identify critical safety concerns and prioritize effective interventions. This chapter outlines the data sources, collection methodologies, and analytical processes employed to ensure a comprehensive understanding of roadway safety issues within the City.

Collision data were analysed using various tools and techniques to identify citywide trends through visual tools and spatial analysis. The key components of the study include:

DATA SOURCES

METHODOLOGY
Categorizing collisions by severity (fatal, severe
injury, visible injury, and complaint of pain).

Identifying patterns related to collision type,
primary violation factor, weather conditions,
and lighting conditions to better understand
contributing factors.

Examining patterns by year, month, day of week,
and time of day.

Examining the age and gender of people
involved to highlight key demographic trends.

Assessing impacts on vulnerable road users
such as pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists,
alongside motor vehicle occupants, to guide
targeted safety measures.

Mapping collision locations using Geographic
Information System (GIS) tools to pinpoint highinjury intersections and corridors.

Severity Analysis
Temporal Trends
Road User Analysis Collision Characteristics Analysis
Spatial Distribution Analysis
Demographics Analysis
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 45
The California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
produces annual collision rankings for all
California jurisdictions, enabling cities and
counties to benchmark their traffic safety
performance against other similar sized cities
throughout the state. The OTS Rankings were
developed to provide individual jurisdictions
with comparative traffic safety statistics,
allowing them to identify areas requiring
improvement and recognize where they
demonstrate strong safety performance.

Rankings are developed for each of California’s
municipalities using the Empirical Bayesian
Ranking Method. This methodology
incorporates population and daily vehicle miles
traveled alongside collision records, collision
trends, and other weighting factors to produce
a comprehensive ranking system. The results
assist both local jurisdictions and OTS in
identifying emerging or ongoing traffic safety
A full list of all categories is posted on California
OTS’s website .

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) RANKINGS
out of 104 cities out of 104 cities out of 104 cities out of 104 cities

DUI ARRESTS
4TH 18TH 30TH 35TH
problem areas, facilitating strategic planning
efforts and supporting grant application
processes.

In recent years, media, researchers, and the
public have shown increased interest in OTS
Rankings. It should be noted that OTS rankings
serve as indicators of potential problems rather
than definitive assessments. Many factors
may either understate or overstate a city’s
ranking, requiring evaluation based on local
circumstances and context.

The following OTS rankings represent Pico
Rivera’s performance for 2022, the most recent
available data. These City rankings encompass
all collisions, including fatal and injury collisions
within City boundaries. Lower rankings indicate
high number of collisions in the respective
category compared to other cities of similar size.

The figures below show the injury collisions, KSI
(Killed or Severe Injury) collisions, pedestrian and
bicycle collisions within Pico Rivera. https://www.ots.ca.gov/media-and-research/crash-rankings-results/?wpv_view_ count=1327&wpv-wpcf-year=2022&wpv-wpcf-city_county=Pico+Rivera&wpv_ filter_submit=Submit

NIGHTTIME

COLLISIONS
(9:00 PM - 2:59 AM)

SPEED-RELATED

COLLISIONS

HIT AND RUN

COLLISIONS
46 Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks
0 1 Mile

ALL COLLISIONS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 47
Fatal
Severe Injury
Schools
Parks
0 1 Mile

KSI COLLISIONS
48 Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks
0 1 Mile
½
½
½
½

PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 49
Fatal
Class I Bikeways
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Visible Injury
Schools
Parks
0 1 Mile

BICYCLE COLLISIONS
50 In this five-year period from 2020 to 2024, the
City of Pico Rivera reported 865 injury collisions
within the City. The figure below illustrates
the distribution of all 865 injury collisions
based on severity. Among these, 162 collisions
(approximately 18 percent) were killed or severe
injury (KSI) collisions which includes 20 fatal
(two percent) and 142 severe injury collisions (16
percent). There are 387 visible injury collisions
accounting for approximately 45 percent of
the total injury collisions, and 316 collisions are
classified under complaint of pain (37 percent).

This analysis identifies key trends and safety challenges affecting all road users. The findings support data-driven decision-making and help guide the development of targeted strategies within the CSAP.

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
865
Injury
Collisions
This analysis focuses exclusively on injury
collisions and does not include property
damage only (PDO) collisions. Safe Streets
and Roads for All (SS4A) initiative prioritizes
interventions that address human harm and
fatalities. The CSAP’s primary objective centers
on eliminating deaths and serious injuries
through targeted safety improvements,
making injury collisions the appropriate
dataset for identifying high-risk locations and
developing effective countermeasures.
387
45%
316
37%
20 2% 142
16%
Complaint of Pain
316
37%
Visible Injury
387
45%
Fatal
20 2%
Severe Injury
142
16%
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 51
246 70
318 69
121 21
16 4
701 164
Severe
Injury
142
Visible
Injury
387
Complaint of
Pain
316
Total
865
Fatal
20 COLLISION BY SEVERITY AND LOCATION TYPE (2020-2024)
Collisions occurring at the intersections (85
percent KSI and 81 percent injury collisions)
were significantly higher compared to
those occurring on roadway.segments.

LOCATION
85%
81%
15%
19%
KSI Collision
Injury Collision
Roadway
Roadway
At Intersection
At Intersection
Injury Collisions KSI
52 109
146
195
216
199
15 31 29 36
51 0
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
The highest number of KSI collisions
occurred in 2024 (51 collisions), while
highest number of injury collisions were
reported in 2023 (216 collisions).

YEARLY TREND
KSI collisions were reported the highest in the months of November and October (20 and 18 collisions respectively), while highest number of injury collisions occurred in October and April (85 and 80 collisions).

MONTHLY TREND
62 67
59 80 77 76
69 72
68 85
71 79
11 12
7 11 13 16 15 14 12
18 20
13 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
This section illustrates the series of charts and graphs showing collision trends based on various factors.

KSI collisions include fatal and severe injuries, while injury collisions encompass fatal, severe, visible injuries, and complaints of pain. Key findings from the overall collision analysis are provided below:

OVERALL COLLISION ANALYSIS
Injury Collisions KSI
Injury Collisions KSI
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 53
Both KSI and injury collisions peaked between 5 p.m. and 6 p.m.

HOURLY TREND
KSI collisions were recorded the highest
on Saturdays (29 collisions), whereas
injury collisions were recorded on
Tuesdays (141 collisions).

DAILY TREND
0 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
130
141
107
118 125 135
109
27 21 23 29 24 20 18
0 12AM 1AM 2AM 3AM 4AM 5AM 6AM 7AM 8AM 9AM 10AM 11AM 12PM 1PM 2PM 3PM 4PM 5PM 6PM 7PM 8PM 9PM 10PM 11PM 25 14
19 22
9 17
13 47
41 22
32 30
34 40
51 49
60 68
64 50
34 51
41 32
7 5 3 4 3 3 1
9 4 4 5 4 6
2 5
12 8
14 14
12 10 13
9 5
Injury Collisions KSI
Injury Collisions KSI
54 Passenger cars and pickup trucks accounted for most of the injury collisions (74 percent), followed by pedestrian collisions (nine percent), bicycle (seven percent), and motorcycles (five percent). Passenger cars and pickup trucks accounted for the highest KSI collisions as well (57 percent). Pedestrians, bicycles, and motorcycles make up a larger percentage of KSI collisions when compared to their share to injury collisions.

TRANSPORTATION MODE
74% 57%
9% 16%
3% 2%
7% Bicycle 12%
1% Others 1%
Truck
5% Motorcycle 12%
Pedestrian
Passenger Car
or Pickup Truck
0% 0%
Injury Collisions KSI
KSI and injury collisions predominantly occurred during clear weather conditions, accounting for 91 percent and 90 percent respectively.

WEATHER CONDITIONS
Clear
Cloudy
Raining
Fog
Other
0% 0%
90%
7%
2%
1%
90%
6%
3%
1%
Injury Collisions KSI
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 55
The leading collision type for KSI and injury collisions recorded were broadside collisions, followed by rear end collisions, head-on, vehicle/pedestrian, and hit object collisions.

COLLISION TYPE
0% 0%
Other/Non
Stated
3%
Vehicle/
Pedestrian
7% 9%
Head-On
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
11%
12%
26%
33%
7%
1%
13%
9%
17%
37%
10%
2%
3%
Injury Collisions KSI
56 Unsafe speed collisions were the most common among the violation category collisions with 26 percent KSI collisions and 30 percent injury collisions, followed by automobile right of way with 17 percent KSI collisions and 18 percent injury collisions. Other significant contributing factors were improper turning, and traffic signals and signs.

VIOLATION CATEGORY
Automobile
Right of Way
Pedestrian
Right of Way
Pedestrian
Violation
Traffic Signals
and Signs
Unsafe Speed
Unsafe Starting
or Backing
Wrong Side of
Road
Other/Unknown
DUI
Following Too
Closely
Improper
Turning
0% 0%
18%
15%
2%
4%
10%
30%
3%
2%
9%
4%
3%
17%
6%
1%
13%
2%
10%
14%
1%
2%
9%
26%
Injury Collisions KSI
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 57
59%
35%
1%
1%
4%
9%
7%
7%
11%
4%
62%
15%
6%
11%
15%
5%
49%
2%
45%
3%
1%
48%
Collisions between two or more motor vehicles were the most common, comprising 48 percent of KSI collisions and 62 percent of injury collisions.

MOTOR VEHICLE INVOLVED WITH
Pedestrian
Other Motor
Vehicle
Parked Motor
Vehicle
Bicycle
Fixed/Other
Object
Other/Non
Stated
0% 0%
Most collisions occurred in daylight (49 percent of KSI, 59 percent of injury collisions), while dark conditions with streetlights contributed to 45 percent of KSI collisions and 35 percent of injury collisions.

LIGHTING CONDITIONS
Daylight
Dusk - Dawn
Dark - Street Lights
Dark - No Street Lights
Not Stated
0% 0%
Injury Collisions KSI
Injury Collisions KSI
58 The next step in the analysis involved identifying
the High Injury Network (HIN), which includes
high risk intersections and roadway segments
within the City of Pico Rivera. In order to
precisely map regions with a high incidence
of KSI and injury collisions, collision data
was examined and spatially depicted using
ArcGIS. Based on the frequency and severity of
collisions, a thorough list of high-injury corridors
was created. Following that, these corridors were
graded using a priority points system that was
created to impartially assess and rank the areas
that most urgently needed safety upgrades.

Priority points were calculated using a weighted
scoring system that considers multiple factors,
including the severity index, the number of
KSI collisions, the number of pedestrian and
bicycle-related collisions, and the number of
collisions that occurred at intersections along
each corridor. The severity index was developed
by assigning weighted values to different
injury levels: a value of five was assigned to KSI
collisions, three to visible injuries, and one to
complaints of pain. This approach ensures that

HIGH INJURY NETWORK
corridors with a higher concentration of severe
and vulnerable road user collisions are given
greater priority in safety planning efforts.

The intersection ranking methodology
incorporates two distinct assessment categories
to provide comprehensive evaluation. The
primary category encompasses all collision
types and receives 80 percent weightage in
the final calculation. The secondary category
focuses specifically on pedestrian and bicycleinvolved collisions, recognizing the heightened vulnerability of these road users, and carries 20
percent weightage. A weighted average severity
score was calculated for each intersection by
combining these categories proportionally.

Based on these priority points, the highestscoring intersections have been identified.

A separate map and list of high injury roadway
segments and intersections are also included in
this section.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 59
A
Rosemead Blvd:

Telegraph Rd to Gallatin Rd
3 39 78 66 42 186 22 13 4.33
B
Whittier Blvd:

Esperanza Ave to Van Norman Rd
7 17 42 43 24 109 13 9 1.70
C
Slauson Ave:

East City Limit to West City Limit
3 14 52 21 17 90 1 2 1.90
D
Paramount Blvd:

Telegraph Rd to Gallatin Rd
3 16 32 32 19 83 2 4 4.02
E Beverly Blvd:

San Gabriel River Fwy to Pine St
1 12 33 27 13 73 5 6 1.77
F
Passons Blvd:

Telegraph Rd to Whittier Blvd
0 6 22 16 6 44 7 8 3.60
G Washington Blvd:

East City Limit to West City Limit
2 9 30 24 11 65 5 2 2.01
H Telegraph Rd:

East City Limit to West City Limit
0 8 22 20 8 50 2 0 2.41
I
Durfee Ave:

Kruse Rd to Whittier Blvd
0 3 5 5 3 13 0 3 1.50
J
Gallatin Rd:

Paramount Blvd to Durfee Ave
0 2 4 7 2 13 1 1 0.61
L San Gabriel River Pkwy:

Beverly Rd to Rose Hills Rd
0 2 4 3 2 9 1 1 1.28
The table below provides the list of high injury corridors within the City of Pico Rivera. Rank HIN Corridor Fatal Severe Injury Visible Injury Complaint of Pain KSI Collisions Injury Collisions Pedestrian CollisionsBicycle CollisionsLength (miles)
60 Schools
High Injury Corridors
Parks
0 1 Mile
X

HIGH INJURY CORRIDORS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 61
1 Rosemead Blvd & Beverly Blvd 0 4 10 12 4 26 2 1
2 Rosemead Blvd & Washington Blvd 1 2 8 11 3 22 3 1
3 Paramount Blvd & Beverly Blvd 0 5 4 11 5 20 1 2
4 Slauson Ave & Passons Blvd 0 2 11 3 2 16 0 2
5 Rosemead Blvd & Slauson Ave 0 1 11 4 1 16 1 2
6 Rosemead Blvd & Whitter Blvd 0 5 3 5 5 13 1 1
7 Paramount Blvd & Telegraph Rd 0 4 5 3 4 12 2 0
8 Paramount Blvd & Whitter Blvd 0 2 5 7 2 14 0 2
9 Whitter Blvd & Orange Ave 1 2 5 1 3 9 2 0
10 Rosemead Blvd & Gallatin Rd 0 2 4 11 2 17 0 0
11 Slauson Ave & Serapis Ave 0 2 6 5 2 13 0 0
12 Rosemead Blvd & Olympic Blvd 2 1 4 5 3 12 0 1
13 Slauson Ave & Paramount Blvd 1 2 3 5 3 11 1 2
14 Slauson Ave & Reeves Rd 0 2 7 0 2 9 0 0
15 Rosemead Blvd & Market Pl 0 2 5 2 2 9 2 1
The table below provides the list of high injury intersections within the City of Pico Rivera. Rank Intersection Name Fatal Severe Injury Other Visible Injury Complaint of Pain KSI Collisions Injury Collisions Pedestrian Injury CollisionsBicycle Injury Collisions
62 Schools
Parks
0 1 Mile
X High Injury Intersections

HIGH INJURY INTERSECTIONS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 63
Collision Profiles represent specific patterns
and trends in traffic collisions that are identified
through a comprehensive analysis of injuryrelated crashes within the City of Pico Rivera.

These profiles serve as a critical foundation for
developing targeted safety strategies under
the CSAP. Analysis of five years of collision
data (2020–2024) pinpoints recurring types of
collisions, contributing behaviors, and physical
locations that pose the highest risk to roadway
users.

The purpose of developing collision profiles is
to better understand the factors driving injury
collisions and to enable data-driven decisionmaking. These profiles help in identifying the most effective countermeasures that can be
applied to reduce collisions and enhance public
safety. Collision Profiles may focus on types of
collisions, violation category, transportation
mode, and environmental conditions.

This chapter provides a summary of the top ten
collision profiles identified in the City of Pico
Rivera based on an in-depth analysis of collision
trends from 2020 to 2024.

COLLISION PROFILES
For each collision profile, the section presents:
• A map illustrating the geographic
distribution of related collisions
• The number of injury collisions, and KSI
collisions
• The most common trends for a given
collision profile (e.g., location type, collision
types, violation categories, lighting
conditions, mode of transportation, land use
type)
Outlined below are the identified collision
profiles:

1. Intersection collisions

2. Nighttime collisions

3. Collisions due to automobile right of way
violation

4. Broadside collisions

5. Rear end Collisions

6. Unsafe speed collisions

7. Pedestrian collisions

8. Bicycle collisions

9. Improper turning collisions

10. Hit object collisions
64 INTERSECTION COLLISIONS

PROFILE ONE
Intersections are the predominant collision
location type in Pico Rivera, accounting for over
four-fifths of all injury and KSI collisions citywide.

The concentration of collisions at intersections
indicates that these are critical focus areas
requiring immediate safety interventions. The
data shows a clear pattern where multiple
conflict points, vehicle interactions, and
decision-making complexity create high-risk
environments for all road users.
• 50 percent occur at signalized intersections, suggesting signal timing, visibility or compliance issues • Nighttime conditions contribute to 40 percent injury and 51 percent KSI collisions • Broadside collisions most common (34 percent injury, 41 percent KSI) • Unsafe speed violations present in 28 percent injury and 24 percent KSI collisions • Commercial areas account for 44 percent injury and 40 percent KSI collisions

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Vulnerable road users (pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists) represent 23 percent of injury but 56 percent of KSI collisions
• Evening peak hour (5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) sees highest injury collision frequency (8 percent) • KSI severity increases dramatically in nighttime conditions (40 percent vs 51 percent)

KEY INSIGHTS
• Conduct comprehensive intersection safety audits focusing on signal timing and visibility • Implement enhanced lighting at intersections to address nighttime KSI collision • Deploy broadside collision countermeasures: protected left-turns, red-light enforcement • Prioritize vulnerable user protections through dedicated phases and protected crossings • Consider traffic calming and speed reduction near high-injury intersections

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 65
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
At Signalized
Intersections 55 (40%)
Broadside
Collisions 56 (41%)
Unsafe Speed
Violations 33 (24%)
Rear End
Collisions 21 (15%)
24 (18%) Auto ROW
Violations
Nighttime
Collisions* 70 (51%)
350 (50%)
283 (40%)
237 (34%)
193 (28%)
178 (25%)
134 (19%)
Injury Collisions 701 KSI Collisions 137

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
57 (8%) 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 10 (7%)
307 (44%) 55 (40%)
230 (33%) 48 (35%)
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
66 Others/Unknown 5 (1%)
Bus 2 (0%)
Others/Unknown 1 (1%)
Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Bicycle
Motorcycle
Motorcycle
Pedestrian Bicycle
Truck Truck
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
517 (74%)
55 (8%)
35 (5%)
15 (11%)
18 (13%)
77 (56%)
70 (10%)
17 (2%) 3(2%)
23 (17%)
701 137
1 (1%)
5 (1%)
The figure shows
the injury collisions
that occurred at
intersections in City of
Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 67
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

INTERSECTION COLLISIONS
68 NIGHTTIME COLLISIONS
Nighttime collisions represent a
disproportionate safety concern in Pico Rivera.

While accounting for 40 percent of all injury
collisions, they constitute 50 percent of all KSI
collisions, indicating that collisions occurring
during dark conditions or at dusk/dawn are
significantly more severe. This elevated severity
suggests that reduced visibility, impaired driver
detection of hazards, and potential differences
in driver behavior during nighttime hours
contribute to worse collision outcomes.
• Unsafe speed violations are primary factor (37 percent injury, 36 percent KSI) • Rear-end collisions account for 26 percent of injury collisions • Broadside collisions represent 24 percent injury and 30 percent KSI • 82 percent injury collisions occur at intersections
• Residential and commercial areas shares nearly equal injury collisions (36 percent and 37 percent respectively)

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Pedestrians account for 12 percent injury but 20 percent KSI collisions, showing high vulnerability after dark
• Bicyclists represent 5 percent injury but 12 percent KSI collisions, showing similar vulnerability as pedestrians
• Peak collision hour is 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (14 percent injury, 16 percent KSI)

KEY INSIGHTS
• Conduct citywide lighting audit and upgrade inadequate street lighting • Install high-visibility crosswalk treatments with enhanced lighting and RRFBs • Implement bicycle lighting requirements campaign and separated facilities with lighting • Deploy speed feedback signs and automated enforcement in high nighttime speeding areas • Improve pavement markings with reflective materials for lane and edge visibility

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE TWO
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 69
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Broadside
Collisions
11 (14%)
Unsafe Speed
Violations
24 (30%)
Rear End
Collisions 15 (19%)
29 (36%)
Head On
Violations
129 (37%)
90 (26%)
83 (24%)
52 (15%)
Injury Collisions 348 KSI Collisions 81

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
48 (14%) 13 (16%)
128 (37%)
283 (82%)
25 (31%)
70 (86%)
123 (36%)
163 (18%)
34 (42%)
11 (14%)

LOCATION TYPE
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
70 Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Bicycle
Motorcycle
Motorcycle
Bicycle Pedestrian
Truck
Truck
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
258 (75%)
18 (5%)
35 (5%)
6 (7%)
10 (12%)
77 (56%)
42 (12%)
7 (2%)
2(2%)
16 (20%)
346 81
3 (1%)
The figure shows the
injury collisions that
occurred at Nighttime
in City of Pico Rivera.

Bus 1 (0%)
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 71
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

NIGHTTIME COLLISIONS
72 COLLISIONS DUE TO AUTOMOBILE

RIGHT-OF-WAY VIOLATION
Right-of-way violations by automobiles are a
significant collision factor, representing nearly
one in five injury collisions citywide. These
violations typically occur when drivers fail to
yield at intersections, turn across oncoming
traffic without adequate gaps, or disregard traffic
control devices. The strong correlation with
broadside collisions clearly indicates that failure to
yield is creating dangerous perpendicular impact
scenarios with high injury potential.
• Broadside collisions dominate (75 percent injury, 81 percent KSI), highest correlation of any profile
• 86 percent occur at intersections, with only 28 percent at signalized locations • Commercial areas experience 45 percent injury and 48 percent KSI collisions • Passenger cars and pickup trucks account for 77 percent injury and 70 percent KSI • Nighttime conditions present in 24 percent injury and 37 percent KSI collisions

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Peak hour is 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM (10 percent injury, 19 percent KSI) • Motorcyclists represent 8 percent injury but 19 percent KSI collisions • 72 percent injury collisions occur at unsignalized locations, suggesting a need to address inadequate sight distance and/or warning signs

KEY INSIGHTS
• Conduct sight distance assessments and remove visual obstructions at unsignalized intersections • Consider all-way stop controls or roundabouts at high-collision unsignalized intersections • Implement intersection warning enhancements: advance signs, stop bars, enhanced visibility • Deploy targeted enforcement campaigns at high-risk intersections during evening peak hours • Consider protected left-turn phasing at signalized intersections with high Right-of-way violations

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE THREE
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 73
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Broadside
Collisions
1 (4%)
At Signalized
Intersection
10 (37%) Nighttime
Collisions
6 (22%)
22 (81%)
Sideswipe
Violations
116 (75%)
43 (28%)
37 (24%)
13 (8%)
Injury Collisions 155 KSI Collisions 27

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Collisions near commercial areas
Intersection
Collisions
Collisions near residential areas
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
16 (10%) 5 (19%)
70 (45%)
134 (86%)
13 (48%)
24 (89%)
49 (32%)
21 (14%)
6 (22%)
3 (11%)

LOCATION TYPE
74 Truck 1 (1%)
Bus 1 (1%)
Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Motorcycle
Bicycle Motorcycle Pedestrian Bicycle
KSI Collisions
119 (77%)
12 (8%)
3 (11%) 5 (19%) 18 (12%)
19 (70%)
4 (3%)
155 27
The figure shows the
Automobile Right
of Way violation
injury collisions that
occurred in City of
Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 75
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

COLLISIONS DUE TO AUTOMOBILE RIGHT-OF-WAY VIOLATION
76 BROADSIDE COLLISIONS
Broadside (T-bone or angle) collisions are the
single most common collision type in Pico
Rivera, accounting for approximately onethird of all injury collisions and over one-third of KSI collisions. These perpendicular-impact
collisions are inherently severe due to limited
vehicle protection on the sides and the direct
transfer of collision forces to vehicle occupants.

The predominance of these collisions at
intersections signals fundamental issues with
vehicle control, driver decision-making, and
traffic control effectiveness.
• Auto right-of-way violations as a primary cause (41 percent injury, 37 percent KSI) • 41 percent injury and 40 percent KSI occur at signalized intersections • 85 percent injury and 93 percent KSI occur at intersections overall • Traffic signal and sign violations contribute to 23 percent injury and 25 percent KSI • Commercial areas account for 44 percent injury and 53 percent KSI collisions

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Vulnerable road users represent 25 percent injury but 38 percent KSI collisions • Evening peak hour 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. has high concentration (10 percent injury, 15 percent KSI) • Nighttime conditions present in 30 percent injury but 40 percent KSI collision

KEY INSIGHTS
• Implement protected signal phasing: protected left-turns and leading pedestrian intervals • Deploy red-light running countermeasures: advance warnings, automated enforcement • Improve intersection visibility through obstruction removal and enhanced lighting • Install high-visibility crosswalk markings and bicycle crossing treatments • Review and optimize signal timing, particularly yellow and all-red clearance intervals

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE FOUR
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 77
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Auto ROW
Violations
15 (25%)
At Signalized
Intersection
Nighttime
Collisions
24 (40%)
24 (40%)
22 (37%)
Traffic Signal and
Signs Violations
116 (41%)
114 (41%)
83 (30%)
63 (23%)
Injury Collisions 280 KSI Collisions 60

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
28 (10%)
70 (45%)
273 (85%)
32 (53%)
56 (89%)
49 (32%)
43 (15%)
16 (27%)
4 (7%)

LOCATION TYPE
9 (15%)
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
78 Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Bicycle
Motorcycle
Motorcycle
Bicycle
Pedestrian
Truck
Truck Others
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
198 (71%)
55 (8%)
35 (5%)
8 (13%)
10 (17%)
35 (58%)
70 (10%)
17 (2%)
1(2%) 1(2%)
5 (8%)
280 60
The figure shows
the Broadside
injury collisions that
occurred in City of
Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 79
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

BROADSIDE COLLISIONS
80 REAR-END COLLISIONS
Rear-end collisions represent the second
most common collision type in Pico Rivera,
accounting for over one-quarter of all injury
collisions. These collisions typically result from
following too closely, distracted driving, unsafe
speeding or inadequate braking response.

While rear-end collisions generally have lower
fatality rates compared to broadside or head-on
crashes, they still contribute significantly to the
injury burden and indicate systemic issues with
driver attention, gap acceptance, and speed
management.
• Unsafe speed overwhelmingly represent as a primary factor (67 percent injury, 56 percent KSI) • 50 percent injury collisions occur at signalized intersections • Passenger cars and pickup trucks account for 93 percent injury and 85 percent KSI • 79 percent collisions occur at intersections overall

DOMINANT FACTORS
• KSI collisions more likely in residential areas
• Peak collision hour is 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. (11 percent injury) • Nighttime KSI proportion (56 percent) significantly higher than injury (40 percent)

KEY INSIGHTS
• Implement comprehensive speed management: traffic calming, speed feedback signs, enforcement • Improve signal visibility and advance warning at high rear-end collision intersections • Deploy enhanced pavement markings: stop bars, advance warnings, ‘Signal Ahead’ signs • Optimize signal timing to reduce abrupt stops and provide adequate clearance times • Launch public education on safe following distances and distracted driving

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE FIVE
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 81
Injury Collisions 226 KSI Collisions 27
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Auto ROW
Violations
At Signalized
Intersection
Nighttime
Collisions
7 (26%)
15 (56%)
151 (67%) 15 (56%)
114 (50%)
90 (40%)

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.

Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
24 (11%)
90 (40%)
273 (85%)
6 (22%)
21 (78%)
69 (31%)
43 (15%)
13 (48%)
6 (22%)

LOCATION TYPE
1 (4%)
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
82 Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Motorcycle Truck Motorcycle Bicycle
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
211 (93%)
2 (1%)
5 (2%) 1 (4%) 2 (7%)
23 (85%)
6 (3%)
1 (4%)
226 27
The figure shows
the Rear end injury
collisions occurred in
City of Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 83
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

REAR-END COLLISIONS
84 UNSAFE SPEED COLLISIONS
Unsafe speed is the leading violation category
in Pico Rivera, contributing to nearly one-third
of all injury collisions citywide. Speed-related
collisions are particularly concerning because
increased speeds exponentially increase both
the likelihood of collision and the severity
of resulting injuries. The physics of collision
demonstrate that even small increases in speed
dramatically reduce available reaction time,
extend stopping distances, and increase kinetic
energy that must be absorbed in a collision. The
data suggests speed management must be a
one of the top priority for the CSAP.
• Rear-end collisions most common type (59 percent injury, 36 percent KSI) • 50 percent injury collisions occur during nighttime, increasing to 69 percent for KSI • 75 percent injury and 79 percent KSI occur at intersections • Passenger cars and pickup trucks account for 88 percent injury and 79 percent KSI • Residential areas see 38 percent injury and 43 percent KSI collisions

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Hit object collisions represent 11 percent injury but 24 percent KSI • Motorcyclists represent 4 percent injury collisions but 10 percent KSI collisions • Peak collision hour is 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (7 percent injury, 10 percent KSI)

KEY INSIGHTS
• Implement comprehensive speed management: engineering, enforcement, and education • Deploy traffic calming in residential areas: speed humps, raised crosswalks, curb extensions • Install speed feedback signs at locations with documented speed-related collision history • Consider automated speed enforcement in school zones and high-collision corridors • Enhance roadway lighting to address disproportionate nighttime KSI collision rate

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE SIX
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 85
Injury Collisions 258 KSI Collisions 42
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Auto ROW
Violations
10 (24%)
10 (24%)
At Signalized
Intersection
Nighttime
Collisions
29 (69%)
15 (36%)
Traffic Signal and
Signs Violations
151 (59%)
129 (50%)
96 (37%)
29 (11%)

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
19 (7%)
99 (38%)
193 (75%)
18 (43%)
33 (79%)
79 (31%)
65 (25%)
7 (17%)
9 (21%)

LOCATION TYPE
4 (10%)
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
86 Others/Unknown 1 (1%)
Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Truck Pedestrian Motorcycle Truck Bicycle Motorcycle
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
226 (88%)
11 (4%) 4 (10%) 1 (2%)
33 (79%)
8 (3%) 8 (3%) 1(2%)
3 (7%)
258 42
2 (1%)
3 (1%) The figure shows the
unsafe speed injury
collisions occurred in
City of Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 87
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

UNSAFE SPEED COLLISIONS
88 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS
Pedestrian collisions, while representing
9 percent of injury collisions, account for a
disproportionate 16 percent of KSI collisions,
demonstrating the high vulnerability of people
walking when struck by vehicles. Pedestrians
lack any protection from impact forces, making
even low-speed collisions potentially deadly.

Collision analysis reveals critical safety gaps in
pedestrian infrastructure, visibility, and driver
yielding behavior that require immediate
attention to protect vulnerable road users.
• Nighttime conditions present in 51 percent injury collisions, increasing to 62 percent for KSI collisions • Pedestrian violations contribute to 32 percent injury and 46 percent KSI collisions • Pedestrian right-of-way violations by drivers account for 23 percent injury and 12 percent KSI • Only 24 percent injury and 15 percent KSI occur at signalized intersections • 85 percent injury and 88 percent KSI occur at intersections

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Peak collision hour is 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (13 percent injury, 12 percent KSI) • High percentage of pedestrian violations in KSI (46 percent) suggests mid-block crossings or not walking on sidewalk lead to severe outcomes
• Most collisions occur at unsignalized locations (76 percent injury, 85 percent KSI)

KEY INSIGHTS
• Conduct pedestrian infrastructure audit identifying gaps in sidewalks, crosswalk spacing, ADA compliance
• Install high-visibility crosswalk treatments: enhanced lighting, reflective markings, RRFBs • Implement leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections • Upgrade street lighting at all pedestrian crossings, focusing on high nighttime collision areas • Reduce crossing distances through curb extensions and median refuge islands

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE SEVEN
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 89
Injury Collisions 82 KSI Collisions 26
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Nighttime
Collisions
3 (12%)
4 (15%)
Pedestrian
Violations*
At Signalized
Intersection
12 (46%)
16 (62%)
Pedestrian ROW
Violations^
42 (51%)
26 (32%)
20 (24%)
19 (23%)

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
11 (13%)
12 (15%)
39 (48%)
70 (85%)
12 (46%)
23 (88%)
31 (38%) 11 (42%)
3 (12%)

LOCATION TYPE
3 (12%)
*Pedestrian Violations are traffic violations committed by pedestrians, such as jaywalking (crossing streets illegally), crossing against traffic signals, or failing to use designated crosswalks when available. ^Pedestrian Right-of-Way Violations are traffic violations committed by drivers who fail to yield to pedestrians when pedestrians have the legal right-of-way, such as at marked crosswalks, intersections, or when pedestrians are crossing legally.

Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
90 0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 91

BICYCLE COLLISIONS
Bicycle collisions show a disparity between
injury (7 percent) and KSI (12 percent) collisions
percentages. When bicyclists are involved
in collisions, outcomes are substantially
more severe, indicating fundamental
intersection safety conflicts and gaps in bicycle
infrastructure protection.
• Broadside collisions dominate (63 percent injury, 50 percent KSI) • 87 percent injury and 90 percent KSI occur at intersections • Nighttime conditions present in 29 percent injury but 45 percent KSI • 43 percent injury and 35 percent KSI occur at signalized intersections • Automobile Right of Way violations contribute to 29 percent injury and 15 percent KSI

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Residential areas account for 49 percent injury and 45 percent KSI collisions • Peak collision hour is 6:00-7:00 PM (10 percent of injury) • Nighttime KSI severity (45 percent vs 29 percent injury) emphasizes visibility challenges

KEY INSIGHTS
• Develop comprehensive bicycle network with protected bicycle lanes on major corridors • Install protected intersection designs: bicycle signal phasing, dedicated signal heads, setback stop bars
• Implement bike boxes at signalized intersections to increase visibility • Apply high-visibility green pavement markings through conflict zones • Launch bicycle safety education campaigns promoting lighting requirements for nighttime riding

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE EIGHT
92 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9 (45%) Nighttime
Collisions 18 (29%)
Broadside
Collisions 40 (63%) 10 (50%)
At Signalized
Intersection 27 (43%) 7 (35%)
Improper Turning
Violations 13 (21%) 4 (20%)
Auto ROW
Violations 118 (29%) 3 (15%)
Injury Collisions 63 KSI Collisions 20

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
0 31 (49%) 9 (45%)
25 (40%) 8 (40%)
0% 0%
Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
8 (13%)
55 (87%) 18 (90%)
2 (10%)

LOCATION TYPE
6 (10%)
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 93
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

BICYCLE COLLISIONS
94 IMPROPER TURNING COLLISIONS
Improper turning violations contribute to 15
percent of all citywide injury collisions. Turning
movements introduce complex conflict points
where drivers must process multiple information
sources while navigating geometric constraints
and interacting with other road users.
• 74 percent injury and 71 percent KSI occur at intersections • Nighttime conditions present in 34 percent injury and 43 percent KSI • 32 percent injury and 24 percent KSI occur at signalized intersections • Broadside and sideswipe collisions each account for 23 percent of injury • 38 percent injury and 52 percent KSI occur in residential areas

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Vulnerable users (bicycles and motorcycles) represent 19 percent injury but 38 percent KSI • Peak collision hour is 2:00-3:00 PM (11 percent of injury collisions)

KEY INSIGHTS
• Improve turn lane geometry and pavement markings to guide proper turning paths • Install dedicated turn lanes where warranted to separate turning from through traffic • Implement protected-permissive left-turn phasing at signalized intersections • Enhance sight distance at unsignalized intersections by removing visual obstructions • Install ‘YIELD TO BIKES/PEDS’ signs at intersections with vulnerable user conflicts

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE NINE
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 95
Injury Collisions 128 KSI Collisions 21
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Nighttime
Collisions
2 (10%)
3 (14%)
At Signalized
Intersection
Broadside
Collisions
5 (24%)
9 (43%)
Sideswipe Collisions
44 (34%)
41 (32%)
30 (23%)
30 (23%)

TOP TREND

PEAK COLLISION HOUR

TOP LAND USE TYPE
2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.

Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
14 (11%)
48 (38%)
95 (74%)
33 (26%)
11 (52%)
15 (71%)
43 (34%) 4 (19%)
6 (29%)

LOCATION TYPE
1 (5%)
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
96 Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Bicycle
Motorcycle Motorcycle
Bicycle
Pedestrian
Truck
Truck
Pedestrian
KSI Collisions
92 (72%)
13 (10%)
11 (9%) 4 (19%)
4 (19%)
11 (52%)
5 (4%)
6 (5%)
1 (5%)
1 (5%)
128 21
1 (1%)
The figure shows the
improper turning
injury collisions
occurred in City of
Pico Rivera.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 97
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

IMPROPER TURNING COLLISIONS
98 HIT OBJECT COLLISIONS
Hit object collisions represent seven percent of
injuries but 10 percent of KSI collisions. These
hit object collisions result from loss of vehicle
control due to excessive speed, distraction,
or impairment, with collision forces creating
severe outcomes.
• Unsafe speed violations present in 47 percent injury collisions and 63 percent KSI collisions, highest across all collisions profiles
• Nighttime conditions account for 44 percent injury and 50 percent KSI • Improper turning violations present in 31 percent injury and 25 percent KSI • 69 percent occur at intersections (both injury and KSI) • 48 percent injury and 38 percent KSI occur in residential areas

DOMINANT FACTORS
• Two distinct peak hours: 2:00-3:00 PM and 10:00-11:00 PM (each 11 percent injury) • Motorcyclists represent 11 percent injury collisions but 25 percent KSI collisions • Higher proportion of roadway segment collisions (31 percent) compared to other profiles

KEY INSIGHTS
• Implement comprehensive speed management including traffic calming on residential streets • Install or upgrade roadside safety barriers in high-risk locations with fixed objects • Remove, relocate, or shield hazardous fixed objects within clear zone where feasible • Deploy edge line or centerline rumble strips to alert drivers of lane departure • Improve roadway delineation with enhanced markings and raised pavement markers on curves

SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS

PROFILE TEN
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 99
Injury Collisions 62 KSI Collisions 16
0% 0%
Unsafe Speed
Violations
4 (25%)
4 (25%)
Nighttime
Collisions
Improper Turning
Violations
8 (50%)
10 (63%)
At Signalized
Intersection
29 (47%)
27 (44%)
19 (31%)
17 (27%)

TOP TREND
0% 0%

TOP LAND USE TYPE
30 (48%) 6 (38%)
15 (24%) 3 (19%)
0% 0%
Intersection
Collisions
Roadway
Segment
Collisions
43 (69%)
19 (31%)
11 (69%)
5 (31%)

LOCATION TYPE
0% 0%

PEAK COLLISION HOUR
2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
7 (11%)
7 (11%)
1 (6%)
2 (13%)
Collisions near commercial areas
Collisions near residential areas
100
Injury Collisions
Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
KSI Collisions
12 (75%)
62 16
The figure shows
the hit object injury
collisions occurred in
City of Pico Rivera.

Passenger Car or
Pickup Truck
Motorcycle Motorcycle
52 (84%)
7 (11%) 4 (25%)
Truck
Pedestrian
1(2%)
2(3%)
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 101
0 1 Mile
Fatal
Severe Injury
Complaint of Pain
Schools
Visible Injury
Parks

HIT OBJECT COLLISIONS
102
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 103
Engagement &
Collaboration

CHAPTER FOUR
104
The development of the Pico Rivera CSAP involved extensive community engagement and collaboration with stakeholders and residents. Traffic safety is a shared responsibility, and the perspectives of residents, community stakeholders, and partner agencies are essential to identifying priority concerns, validating technical findings, and building public support for recommended strategies. The CSAP engagement program was designed to gather input from a broad cross-section of Pico Rivera residents and to ensure that lived experience on city streets informed both the safety analysis and the project identification process.

The CSAP engagement program was designed to reach a broad cross-section of the community and included four primary components:

The following table summarizes all engagement activities conducted for Pico Rivera CSAP.

OVERVIEW
Project Committee: Established to provide technical oversight and stakeholder guidance throughout the plan’s development.

Community Outreach Meetings: Two virtual meetings open to the public, offering opportunities for residents to learn about the project and share feedback.

Public Input Tools: A citywide online safety survey and an interactive web-based mapping platform that allowed residents to identify specific locations and corridors of concern.

Project Website: A dedicated website that served as a central hub for project information, planning documents, and engagement opportunities throughout the process.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 105
Project Webpage
A dedicated project webpage1 was created to provide
residents with ongoing access to CSAP information,
interactive collision map, and survey and map input links throughout the planning process.

Launched in
August, 2025
Online Traffic Safety
Survey and Map Input
Survey
Launch of the citywide online traffic safety survey and web-based public map input platform, allowing residents to submit safety concerns and identify specific locations of concern across the City. A total of 124 questionnaire responses and 167 map input comments were collected over the online survey period.

September 19,
2025- February
23, 2026
Project Committee
Meeting #1
Virtual meeting with the CSAP Project Committee to
introduce project scope, review the Safe System Approach, and present preliminary collision data analysis findings including High Injury Network.

November 4,
2025
Community Outreach
Workshop #1
Virtual public workshop open to all Pico Rivera residents.

Collision data analysis and preliminary High Injury Network findings were presented, and the survey and map input
platform were introduced.

November 4,
2025
Project Committee
Meeting #2
Virtual Project Committee meeting to review
public outreach outcomes, and draft safety project
recommendations.

April 16, 2026
Community Outreach
Meeting #2 (Virtual)
In virtual public meeting, survey and map input results were presented alongside draft project recommendations. April 23, 2026

ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION DATE(S)
106
PROJECT COMMITTEE MEETING #1 PRESENTATION
Appendix C includes presentations of both community outreach meetings and project committee meetings.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 107

CSAP PROJECT COMMITTEE
The Project Committee is a collaborative body established by the City of Pico Rivera as part of CSAP. The committee brings together representatives from municipal departments, regional transportation agencies, emergency services, and local institutions to guide the development of a citywide safety strategy rooted in shared expertise and community accountability.

The formation of the Project Committee was driven by the recognition that improving traffic safety in Pico Rivera requires a coordinated effort that extends beyond any single agency. By convening representatives from the City of Pico Rivera Public Works Department, LA County Sheriff Department at Pico Rivera Station, LA County Fire Department, and Los Angeles Unified School District, the committee is structured to leverage the full breadth of institutional knowledge and resources available across the region to identify and implement effective strategies for reducing serious injuries and fatalities on Pico Rivera’s roadways.

During the preparation of the CSAP, the Project Committee plays a central role in providing policy direction and technical input. Members contribute their unique perspectives on infrastructure, transit operations, emergency response, and school travel safety, collaborating to build a comprehensive understanding of Pico Rivera’s safety challenges. The committee’s diverse representation ensures that the action plan reflects a wide range of concerns, from capital improvements and corridor redesigns to education, enforcement, and emergency response coordination.

The following table lists Project Committee members and their affiliated agencies.

Kenner Guerrero City of Pico Rivera, Public Works Department (Project Manager) Aaron Hernandez City of Pico Rivera, Public Works Department Thomas Mericle City of Pico Rivera, Public Works Department (City Consultant) Juan Guillen Los Angeles Unified School District
Victoria Cisneros Los Angeles Unified School District
Jay Sartoris LA County Fire Department
Quintin Humphrey LA County Fire Department
Farhad Iranitalab City’s Engineering Consultant
Jayro Queme Pico Rivera Resident

REPRESENTATIVE AGENCY
108

PROJECT WEBSITE
A dedicated project website was created at (www.pico-rivera.org/plans-and-projects/ comprehensive-citywide-safety-action-plan/) to provide residents with ongoing access to CSAP information throughout the planning process. The website hosted the project overview, interactive collision map, survey and map input links, and schedule information. It was promoted through City communication channels and partner agency networks to reach a broad audience of Pico Rivera residents. The following figure illustrates the project website homepage.

Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 109

ONLINE MAP INPUT PLATFORM
A web-based public map input platform was made available to allow residents to geospatially identify locations and corridors where they had observed or experienced traffic safety issues. The platform was open from September 19, 2025, to February 23, 2026.

A total of 167 map input comments were received. Analysis of these comments yielded 213 categorized safety-concern responses (102 corridor-specific and 111 intersection-specific), as individual comments often addressed more than one distinct issue type. For example, a single comment at a given location might raise concerns about speeding, school safety, and poor street lighting simultaneously, which would be counted as three separate safety concern line items in the analysis.

All further analysis in this section is based on the 213 categorized responses. The following map illustrates all community input comment locations within the City, where red circles indicate the locations of point comments and blue lines indicate the locations of line comments. Appendix D contains the raw map input comment log and their categorized safety concerns. 110

CORRIDORS
Passons Blvd
Paramount Blvd
Rosemead Blvd
San Gabriel Pkwy
Balfour St
Whittier Blvd
The following figure provides a summary bar chart of the issue categories for corridors.

Bike Lane Improvements
Lighting
Improvements Near School
Pedestrian Safety
Unsafe Speed
Note: This graph represents the top 6 corridors and top 5 issue categories from the map input survey responses
5 5
4 1 3 6
1 1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 3
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 111
Passons Blvd 21
Paramount Blvd 9
Rosemead Blvd 7
San Gabriel Pkwy 6
Balfour St 5
Whittier Blvd 5
Pedestrian Safety 20 9.4%
Bike Lane Improvements 17 8.0%
Unsafe Speed 15 7.0%
Improvements Near School 14 6.6%
Lighting 10 4.7%
Note: Percentages are calculated as a share of 213 total responses.

ISSUE CATEGORY # RESPONSES % OF TOTAL RESPONSES

CORRIDOR NUMBER OF COMMENTS
The highest concentration of comments was received on Passons Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, Rosemead Boulevard, San Gabriel Parkway, Balfour Street and Whittier Boulevard.

Among these, four out of five corridors are consistent with the High Injury Network segments identified in the CSAP collision data analysis. Pedestrian safety and bike lane improvements were the most frequently categorized concerns followed by speeding and improvement near school zones.

The following tables summarizes the corridors receiving the most comments and the distribution of categorized responses by issue type.
112

INTERSECTIONS
Passons Blvd & Marjorie St
Passons Blvd & Slauson Ave
Passons Blvd & Shade Ln
Rosemead Blvd & Mines Ave
Manzanar Ave & Maxine St
Rosemead Blvd & Telegraph Rd
Rosemead Blvd & Whitttier Blvd
The following figure provides a summary bar chart of the issue categories for intersections.

Signal Enhancement
Stop Signs Violation
Improvements Near School
Pedestrian Safety
Traffic Signal Violation
Unsafe Speed
Unsafe Turn
Note: This graph represents the top 7 intersections and top 7 issue categories from the map input survey responses.
5 3 1
1 1 1 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
3 2 1
1 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 113
Passons Blvd & Marjorie St 9
Passons Blvd & Slauson Ave 6
Passons Blvd & Shade Ln 5
Rosemead Blvd & Mines Ave 5
Manzanar Ave & Maxine St 4
Rosemead Blvd & Telegraph Rd 4
Rosemead Blvd & Whitttier Blvd 4
Pedestrian Safety 20 9.4%
Bike Lane Improvements 17 8.0%
Unsafe Speed 15 7.0%
Improvements Near School 14 6.6%
Lighting 10 4.7%

INTERSECTIONS NUMBER OF COMMENTS
ISSUE CATEGORY # RESPONSES % OF TOTAL RESPONSES
Note: Percentages are calculated as a share of 213 total responses. 114

TRAFFIC SAFETY SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS
An online traffic safety survey was administered citywide from September 19, 2025, to February 23, 2026, generating 124 responses. The survey covered travel habits, safety concerns, personal incident experience, school area safety, safety solutions and priorities and background information of respondents. Key highlights are presented below. A complete tabulation of results, is provided in Appendix E.

Respondent
Profile
124 responses collected from September 19, 2025, to February 23, 2026. Highest number of respondents are in age range of 35 and 44 (37 percent). About 96 percent travel primarily by personal vehicle, consistent with Pico Rivera's auto-oriented street network.

Top Safety
Concerns
Speeding (75 percent) and red-light running (50 percent) are the dominant concerns across all road user groups. Distracted driving (43 percent) and poor visibility at intersections (33 percent) are the next most frequently cited concerns.

Pedestrian
Safety
Failure to yield at crosswalks (50 percent) and turning vehicle conflicts (44 percent) are the leading pedestrian safety concerns. Poor lighting (43 percent) and missing crosswalks (31 percent) indicate unmet infrastructure needs.

Bicycle Safety
Poor road conditions ranked first (54 percent), followed by cyclists being unseen at intersection or cyclist right of way violation by drivers (44 percent), absence of bike lanes (34 percent), and vehicles passing too closely (29 percent). Multiple open-ended responses noted need for education among bicycle riders on following traffic rules.

Time-of-Day
Risk
The afternoon period (3 PM to 7 PM) is the highest-risk window according to survey respondents (44 percent). Morning commute hours (6 AM to 10 AM) are the next most-cited period.

School Zone
Safety
88 percent of respondents expressed concern about school-area safety. Double parking during drop-off and pick-up (59 percent), speeding during school hours (53 percent), unsafe walking habits among children (46 percent), and lack of crossing guard (41 percent) are the top driver issues. Inadequate school zone signage (25 percent) and missing or faded crosswalks (20 percent) are prominent pedestrian and bicycle concerns.

Priority
Improvements
High-visibility crosswalks with warning lights (76 percent), leading pedestrian signals (58 percent), and better street lighting (50 percent) are the most requested improvements.

Schools and parks (72 percent) and collision-prone intersections (49 percent) were the most frequently selected geographic focus areas.

Behavior
Change
96 percent of respondents modified their travel behavior due to safety concerns. The most common adaptations are avoiding certain streets or intersections (41 percent), traveling more cautiously (37 percent), and avoiding certain times of day (16 percent).

Note: Survey used multi-select, single-select, and open-text question formats. Percentages for multi-select questions exceed 100% as respondents could select multiple options. Open-text responses were reviewed thematically; locations cited fewer than three times were noted but not individually tabulated.

TOPIC KEY FINDING
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 115

HOW ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH INFORMED THE CSAP

KEY TAKEAWAYS
The engagement findings are directly integrated into the CSAP’s analytical and planning framework.

The traffic safety survey and map input platform validated and enriched the technical collision data analysis. The corridors most frequently identified by residents as high concern are consistent with the High Injury Network corridors identified through quantitative collision analysis. The consistent emphasis on speeding, intersection conflicts, crosswalk violations, and gaps in pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure across both engagement channels reinforced these themes as citywide priorities.

Project Committee guidance ensured that engagement outcomes were interpreted in the context of existing plans, programs, and funding opportunities, and that the project recommendations in this CSAP are implementable within the City’s capital programming and grant-funding environment. • Improvement enhancing pedestrian safety is the most requested improvement type which includes high-visibility crosswalks with warning lights, leading pedestrian signals and better lighting at night. Protected bike lanes and speed feedback signs are also requested. • Speeding and red-light running are the most consistent safety concerns in Pico Rivera, cited across all road user groups and all geographic areas. Any effective safety strategy for the City should treat these two behaviors as the primary targets for both enforcement and engineering countermeasures.
• The afternoon peak (3 to 7 PM) is the period with the highest reported elevated safety risk.

Enforcement, signal timing management, and school zone interventions concentrated in the morning and afternoon peak windows serve the broadest range of users at once. • The 96 percent rate of behavioral adaptation to safety conditions, including widespread route avoidance and time-shifting, reflects a significant collective burden on Pico Rivera residents that is not captured in collision data alone.
124 75% 60% 75%
Survey
Responses
Noted
School Zone
Traffic Safety
Concerns
Reported a
Traffic Incident
Experience
Identified Enforcement as Their Top
Requested
Improvement
116
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 117
Safe Street Toolkit

CHAPTER FIVE
118
This Safe Street Toolkit summarizes the safety improvement countermeasures proposed as part of the Pico Rivera CSAP. The countermeasures are drawn from proven strategies identified by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). A comprehensive list of FHWA’s proven safety countermeasures is included in Appendix F.

The Safe Street Toolkit provides information on each countermeasure’s applicability to different collision types, expected Crash Reduction Factors (CRF), expected service life, and the opportunity for systemic implementation across the region. The countermeasure information is derived from research compiled in the FHWA’s Crash Modification Factor Clearinghouse and guidance in the FHWA’s Roadway Departure Safety, Intersection Safety, and Roadway Safety Information Analysis publications.

While all countermeasures included in this chapter are effective to increase traffic safety, not every measure listed is necessarily suitable for or recommended for immediate implementation in Pico Rivera. Instead, this toolkit serves as a resource library. When safety improvements are needed, the City can select appropriate countermeasures based on specific location needs, community context, available resources, and implementation feasibility. Including a countermeasure in this toolkit does not constitute a particular recommendation for its use; instead, it provides City staff with a broad range of options to consider when addressing identified safety concerns.

While this toolkit focuses primarily on engineering countermeasures, additional strategies are included to encourage a comprehensive approach, incorporating Engineering, Enforcement, and Education. Common violation types like speeding, impaired driving, distracted driving, and failure to yield may warrant supplementing engineering treatments with targeted enforcement or educational campaigns. Coordination with law enforcement and community partners is recommended when applying countermeasures to address these violation types.

TOOLKIT PURPOSE AND APPLICATION

COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 119
Signalized Intersections: This category includes countermeasures that can be applied at intersections controlled by traffic signals, such as signal timing adjustments, improved signage, markings, or geometric improvements.

Unsignalized Intersections: These are countermeasures for intersections without a traffic signal, such as stop-controlled or uncontrolled intersections. Potential countermeasure examples include installing signals, roundabouts, improved signing/striping, etc.

Roadway Segments: This group’s countermeasures focus on improving safety along roadway sections between intersections. These countermeasures include treatments like rumble strips, lighting, guardrails, curve realignments, etc.

Additional Countermeasures: This category lists potential safety strategies such as educational campaigns or enforcement programs.striping, etc.

The countermeasures are grouped into the following categories:

For each countermeasure, the toolkit provides:

The following toolkit entries provide information on the potential countermeasures and guidance on their applicability within Pico Rivera.

NAVIGATING THE TOOLKIT
Collision Types Addressed: This indicates what collision types the countermeasure is intended to mitigate, such as all collisions, pedestrian/bicycle (P&B) collisions, and nighttime collisions.

Expected Service Life: The anticipated number of years the countermeasure will be effective before requiring major rehabilitation or replacement, typically 10 or 20 years.

Collision Reduction Factor (CRF): Based on research studies, implementing this countermeasure can achieve the expected percentage reduction in collisions.

Systemic Approach Opportunity: There is potential for proactively implementing this countermeasure across the region using a systemic risk-based approach rather than just at individual high-collision locations. This has been ranked as a Very High, High, Medium, or Low opportunity. 120
Includes the installation of new
streetlights, upgraded lighting fixtures,
or the enhancement of existing
lighting to improve visibility for all road
users at intersections. This may involve
increasing the number of luminaires,
improving lighting levels, or adjusting
lighting patterns to enhance visibility
and safety for all road users.

Includes New LED lighting, signal back
plates, retro-reflective tape outlining
the back plates, or visors to increase
signal visibility, larger signal heads,
relocation of the signal heads, or
additional signal heads.

Includes adding phases, lengthening
clearance intervals, eliminating or
restricting higher-risk movements,
and coordinating signals at multiple
locations.

ADD INTERSECTION LIGHTING
IMPROVE SIGNAL HARDWARE:

LENSES, BACK-PLATES WITH

RETROREFLECTIVE BORDERS,

MOUNTING, SIZE, AND NUMBER

IMPROVE SIGNAL TIMING
(COORDINATION, PHASES, RED,

YELLOW, OR OPERATION)
Crash Type: Night Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
CRF 40% 15% 15%
Medium Very High Very High
20 10 10

CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION COUNTERMEASURES
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 121
Corridors that have a history of collisions
involving emergency response
vehicles. The target of this strategy is
signalized intersections where normal
traffic operations impede emergency
vehicles and where traffic conditions
create a potential for conflicts between
emergency and nonemergency
vehicles. These conflicts could lead
to almost any type of crash, due to
the potential for erratic maneuvers of
vehicles moving out of the paths of
emergency vehicles.

Intersections that do not currently have
a left turn lane or a related left-turn
phase that are experiencing a large
number of collisions. Many intersection
safety problems can be traced to
difficulties in accommodating leftturning vehicles, in particular where there is currently no accommodation
for left turning traffic. A key strategy
for minimizing collisions related to
left-turning vehicles (angle, rear-end,
sideswipe) is to provide exclusive
left-turn lanes and the appropriate
signal phasing, particularly on highvolume and high-speed major-road approaches.

Left turns are widely recognized as the
highest-risk movements at signalized
intersections. Providing Protected leftturn phases for signalized intersections with existing left turn pockets
significantly improve the safety for leftturn maneuvers by removing the need for the drivers to navigate through
gaps in oncoming/opposing through
vehicles.

INSTALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE

PRE-EMPTION SYSTEMS

INSTALL LEFT-TURN LANE AND/

OR ADD TURN PHASE (SIGNAL HAS

NO LEFT-TURN LANE OR PHASE

BEFORE)

PROVIDE PROTECTED LEFT TURN

PHASE (LEFT TURN LANE ALREADY

EXISTS)
Crash Type: Emergency Vehicle Crash Type: All Crash Type: All 70% 55% 30%
High Low High
10 20 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
122
Converting a signal to a mast arm
from a pedestal-mounted base
provides better visibility of intersection
signs and signals that aid the drivers’
advance perception of the upcoming
intersection. Visibility and clarity of the
signal should be improved without
creating additional confusion or
distraction for drivers.

When drivers approach and traverse
through complex intersections, drivers
may be required to perform unusual
or unexpected maneuvers, so adding
raised pavement markings and striping
can guide motorists through complex
intersections safely.

Includes the installation of flashing
beacons (e.g., yellow beacons, LED
beacons) to alert drivers to an upcoming
signalized intersection or stop sign. This
provides drivers with increased visual
cues, allowing for earlier identification
of the upcoming intersection and
improved reaction time.

CONVERT SIGNAL TO MAST ARM
(FROM PEDESTAL-MOUNTED)

INSTALL RAISED PAVEMENT

MARKERS AND STRIPING

INSTALL FLASHING BEACONS AS

ADVANCE WARNING
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
CRF 30% 10% 30%
Medium Very High Medium
20 10 10

CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 123
Improving pavement friction with
High Friction Surface Treatments can
enhance skid resistance at locations
with high frequencies of wet road
collisions, potentially addressing
collisions caused by a failure to stop.

Raised medians next to left turn lanes
at intersections offer a cost effective
means for reducing collisions and
improving operations at higher volume
intersections.

Signalized Intersections with high
pedestrian-generators nearby (e.g.
transit stops) may experience a high
volumes of pedestrians J-walking
across the travel lanes at mid-block
locations instead of walking to the
intersection and waiting to cross during
the walk-phase.

IMPROVE PAVEMENT FRICTION
(HIGH FRICTION SURFACE

TREATMENTS)

INSTALL RAISED MEDIAN ON

APPROACHES

INSTALL PEDESTRIAN MEDIAN

FENCING ON APPROACHES
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: P & B
55% 25% 35%
Low
10 20 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Medium Medium OPPORTUNITY
124
Collisions related to turning maneuvers
include angle, rear-end, pedestrian,
and sideswipe (involving opposing
left turns) type collisions. If any of
these crash types are an issue at an
intersection, restriction or elimination
of the turning maneuver may be the
best way to improve the safety of the
intersection.

Reduced left-turn conflict intersections
are geometric designs that alter how
left-turn movements occur in order
to simplify decisions and minimize
the potential for related collisions.

Two highly effective designs that rely
on U-turns to complete certain leftturn movements are known as the restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) and
the median U-turn (MUT).

For signalized intersections that have
a significant crash problem, one
alternative to change the nature of
the intersection itself is to convert
the intersection into a roundabout.

Roundabouts can also be very effective
at intersections with complex geometry
and intersections with frequent leftturn movements.

CREATE DIRECTIONAL MEDIAN

OPENINGS TO ALLOW (AND

RESTRICT) LEFT-TURNS AND
U-TURNS (S.I.)

REDUCED LEFT-TURN CONFLICT

INTERSECTIONS

CONVERT INTERSECTION TO

ROUNDABOUT
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
CRF 50% 50% Varies
Medium Medium Low
20 20 20

CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 125
Installing pedestrian countdown
signal heads at signalized pedestrian
crossings with walk/don’t walk
indicators, particularly at locations
with a history of pedestrian-vehicle
collisions, provides pedestrians with
a countdown of remaining crossing
time, encouraging safer and more
timely crossing decisions.

Accessible pedestrian signals provide
information in alternative formats such
as verbal message, audible tones and
vibrating surfaces to communicate
information on the status of pedestrian
crossing (Walk, Flashing Don’t Walk,
or Don’t Walk) to people who are
visually impaired. Speech messages
and wayfinding tones aid in navigation
to the pedestrian push button and
to the far side of the street. Speech
messages also aid sighted pedestrians
by alerting them to the pedestrian
signal indication changing from Don’t
Walk to Walk, reducing instances of
late crossings. Messaging that includes
street names aids in wayfinding and
orientation.

Signalized Intersections with no
marked crossing and pedestrian
signal heads, where pedestrians are
known to be crossing intersections that
involve significant turning movements.

They are especially important at
intersections with (1) multiphase traffic
signals, such as left-turn arrows and
split phases, (2) school crossings, and
(3) double-right or double-left turns.

At signalized intersections, pedestrian
crossings are often safer when the left
turns have protected phases that do
not overlap the pedestrian walk phase.

INSTALL PEDESTRIAN COUNTDOWN

SIGNAL HEADS

ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
(APS) INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
Crash Type: All Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: P & B
25% 45% 25%
High
20 15 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Very High Very High
126
Pedestrian Scramble is a form
of pedestrian “WALK” phase at a
signalized intersection in which all
vehicular traffic is required to stop,
allowing pedestrians/bicyclists to
safely cross through the intersection
in any direction, including diagonally.

Pedestrian Scramble may be
considered at signalized intersections
with very high pedestrian/bicycle
volumes, e.g. in an urban business
district.

Installing an advance stop bar
before the crosswalk at signalized
intersections with marked crossings,
particularly where significant bicycle
and/or pedestrian volumes are known
to occur, helps to improve driver
compliance with the red light and
enhance pedestrian safety.

A designated, painted box at signalized
intersections that offers bicyclists
a multi-stage process to safely and
more visibly make a left turn across an
intersection from a bike lane.

PEDESTRIAN SCRAMBLE INSTALL ADVANCE STOP BAR

BEFORE CROSSWALK BICYCLE TURN BOX
Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: P & B
CRF 40%
High Very High
20 CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
15% 15%
10 10
Very High
Crash Type: P & B
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 127
Addition of LPI gives pedestrians the
opportunity to enter an intersection
3-7 seconds before vehicles are given
a green indication; only minor signal
timing alteration is required.

Unsignalized intersection locations
that have a crash history and have
no controls on the major roadway
approaches. However, all-way stop
control is suitable only at intersections
with moderate and relatively balanced
volume levels on the intersection
approaches. Under other conditions,
the use of all-way stop control may
create unnecessary delays and
aggressive driver behavior.

Installing traffic signals at unsignalized
intersections or locations with
high traffic volumes and complex
movements can improve traffic flow,
reduce congestion, and enhance safety
for all road users.

MODIFY SIGNAL PHASING

TO IMPLEMENT A LEADING

PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL (LPI)

CONVERT TO ALL-WAY STOP
CONTROL (FROM 2-WAY OR YIELD

CONTROL)

INSTALL SIGNALS
Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
60% 50% 30%
Low
10 10 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Very High High

NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION

COUNTERMEASURES
128
Intersections that have a high frequency
of right-angle and left-turn type
collisions. Whether such intersections
have existing crash patterns or not, a
roundabout provides an alternative
to signalization. The primary target
locations for roundabouts should
be moderate-volume unsignalized
intersections.

Installing/upgrading larger or
additional stop signs or other
intersection warning/regulatory signs
at or prior to intersections will enhance
the ability of approaching drivers
to perceive them, improving driver
awareness and reducing the risk of
collisions.

Upgrading intersection pavement
markings, which typically includes the
addition of “Stop Ahead” markings,
centerlines, and stop bars, can improve
driver guidance, reduce confusion,
and enhance overall safety at the
intersection.

CONVERT INTERSECTION
TO ROUNDABOUT OR MINIROUNDABOUT

INSTALL/UPGRADE LARGER OR

ADDITIONAL STOP SIGNS OR

OTHER INTERSECTION WARNING/

REGULATORY SIGNS

UPGRADE INTERSECTION

PAVEMENT MARKINGS
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
CRF
Low Very High
20 CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
15% 25%
10 10
Very High
Crash Type: All
Varies
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 129
Flashing beacons can reinforce driver
awareness of the Non-Signalized
intersection control and can help
mitigate patterns of right-angle
collisions related to stop sign violations.

Post-mounted advanced flashing
beacons or overhead flashing beacons
can be used at stop-controlled
intersections to supplement and call
driver attention to stop signs.

Installing flashing beacons as advance
warning, such as yellow beacons, to
call drivers’ attention to intersection
control signs, provides increased visual
cues and improves driver awareness of
upcoming intersections.

Transverse rumble strips are installed
in the travel lane for the purposes
of providing an auditory and
tactile sensation for each motorist
approaching the intersection.

INSTALL FLASHING BEACONS AT

STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

INSTALL FLASHING BEACONS AS

ADVANCE WARNING

INSTALL TRANSVERSE RUMBLE

STRIPS ON APPROACHES
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
15% 30% 20%
10 10 10

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY High High High
130
Unsignalized intersections with
restricted sight distance and patterns of
collisions related to lack of sight distance
where sight distance can be improved
by clearing roadside obstructions
without major reconstruction of the
roadway.

IMPROVE SIGHT DISTANCE TO

INTERSECTION (CLEAR SIGHT

TRIANGLES)
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 The installation of a splitter island
allows for the addition of a stop sign in
the median to make the intersection
more conspicuous.

Many collisions at unsignalized
intersections are related to rightturn maneuvers. A key strategy for minimizing such collisions is to
provide exclusive right-turn lanes,
particularly on high-volume and highspeed major-road approaches. When considering new right-turn lanes,
potential impacts to non-motorized
users should be considered and
mitigated as appropriate.

INSTALL SPLITTER-ISLANDS ON THE

MINOR ROAD APPROACHES INSTALL RIGHT-TURN LANE
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
55% 40% 20%
Low
20 20
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Medium OPPORTUNITY
Medium
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 131
Intersections that have a long
pedestrian crossing distance, a
higher number of pedestrians, or a
crash history may benefit from the
installation of raised medians/ refuge
islands. Raised medians/refuge islands
decrease the level of exposure for
pedestrians and allow pedestrians
to concentrate on (or cross) only one
direction of traffic at a time.

Installing pedestrian crossings
at uncontrolled locations where
pedestrians are known to cross
intersections involving significant
vehicular traffic, particularly at school
crossings and intersections with right
and/or left-turn pockets, improves
pedestrian safety by providing
designated crossing areas and
enhancing driver awareness.

Many collisions at unsignalized
intersections are related to leftturn maneuvers. A key strategy for minimizing such collisions is to provide
exclusive left-turn lanes, particularly on
high-volume and high-speed majorroad approaches. When considering new left-turn lanes, potential impacts
to non-motorized users should
be considered and mitigated as
appropriate.

INSTALL RAISED MEDIANS / REFUGE

ISLANDS

INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CROSSING AT

UNCONTROLLED LOCATIONS

INSTALL LEFT-TURN LANE (WHERE

NO LEFT-TURN LANE EXISTS)
Crash Type: All Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: P & B
35% 45% 25%
Low High
20 20 10

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Medium
132
Unsignalized intersections with
restricted sight distance and patterns of
collisions related to lack of sight distance
where sight distance can be improved
by clearing roadside obstructions
without major reconstruction of the
roadway.

INSTALL/UPGRADE PEDESTRIAN

CROSSING AT UNCONTROLLED

LOCATIONS (WITH ENHANCED

SAFETY FEATURES)
Crash Type: P & B
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
(RRFB) includes pedestrian-activated
flashing lights and additional signage
that enhance the visibility of marked
crosswalks and alert motorists to
pedestrian crossings. It uses an
irregular flash pattern that is similar to
emergency flashers on police vehicles.

RRFBs are installed at unsignalized
intersections and mid-block pedestrian
crossings.

Intersections noted as having a history
of pedestrian vs. vehicle collisions and
in areas where the likelihood of the
pedestrian presence is high. Corridors
should also be assessed to determine if
there are adequate safe opportunities
for non-motorists to cross and if a
pedestrian signal, or a Pedestrian
Hybrid Beacon (PHB) (also called HighIntensity Activated crossWalK beacon (HAWK)) are needed to provide an
active warning to motorists when a
pedestrian is in the crosswalk.

INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID

FLASHING BEACON (RRFB)

INSTALL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL
(INCLUDING PEDESTRIAN HYBRID

BEACON (HAWK))
Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: P & B
60% 35% 55%
Low
20 CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Very High Medium OPPORTUNITY
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 133
Removing or relocating fixed objects
outside of the Clear Recovery Zone, such
as utility poles, drainage structures,
trees, and other fixed objects, from
locations or roadway segments prone
to collisions, including the outside of
curves, end of lane drops, and within
traffic islands, can significantly reduce
the severity of run-off-road collisions.

Where public right-of-way is limited,
steps should be taken to request
assistance from property owners, as
appropriate.

Areas where crash history indicates
drivers are unintentionally crossing
the median and the cross-overs are
resulting in high severity collisions.

The installation of median barriers
can increase the number of PDO and
non-severe injuries. The net result
in safety from this countermeasure
is connected more to reducing the
severity of collisions not the number of
collisions.

Adding segment lighting along
roadways improves visibility for all road
users, especially during nighttime and
low-visibility conditions, enhancing
safety and reducing the risk of collisions.

REMOVE OR RELOCATE FIXED

OBJECTS OUTSIDE OF CLEAR

RECOVERY ZONE

ADD SEGMENT LIGHTING INSTALL MEDIAN BARRIER
Crash Type: Night Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
35% 35% 25%
High
20 20 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Medium Medium

ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTERMEASURES
134
Guardrail is installed to reduce the
severity of lane departure collisions.

However, guardrail can reduce crash
severity only for those conditions where
striking the guardrail is less severe
than going down an embankment or
striking a fixed object. Guardrail should
only be installed where it is clear that
crash severity will be reduced, or there
is a history of run-off-the-road collisions
at a given location that have resulted in
severe collisions.

INSTALL GUARDRAIL
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 Impact attenuators are typically used
to shield rigid roadside objects such as
concrete barrier ends, steel guardrail
ends and bridge pillars from oncoming
automobiles. Attenuators should only
be installed where it is impractical for
the objects to be removed.

Roadways experiencing frequent lane
departure collisions that result in rollover type collisions as a result of the roadway slope being so severe as to not
accommodate a reasonable degree of
driver correction. When there is a need
to reduce the severity of lane departure
collisions without installing a barrier
system that could result in increased
numbers of collisions.

INSTALL IMPACT ATTENUATORS FLATTEN SIDE SLOPES
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
25% 25% 30%
20 CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH High High OPPORTUNITY Medium
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 135
Areas experiencing head-on collisions
that may be affected by both the
number of vehicles that cross the
centerline and by the speed of
oncoming vehicles. Installing a raised
median is a more restrictive approach
in that it represents a more rigid barrier
between opposing traffic.

Areas experiencing head-on collisions
that may be affected by both the
number of vehicles that cross the
centerline and by the speed of
oncoming vehicles. Roadways with
oversized lanes offer an opportunity
to restripe the roadway to reduce the
lanes to standard widths and use the
extra width for the median.

Locations where high number of
collisions originate as a lane departure
and result in collision with guardrail
or a fixed object located on the side
slope shielded by guardrail. The
guardrail may or may not meet current
standards. Even though guardrails
are generally installed to reduce the
severity of departure collisions, they still
can result in severe collisions in some
locations.

INSTALL RAISED MEDIAN INSTALL MEDIAN (FLUSH) FLATTEN SIDE SLOPES AND

REMOVE GUARDRAIL
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
40% 25% 15%
20 20 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Medium Medium Medium
136
Areas proven to have collisions that
are the result of drivers not being
able to turn onto a high speed
roadway to accelerate until the
desired roadway speed is reached
and areas that do not provide the
opportunity to safety decelerate to
negotiate a turning movement.

INSTALL ACCELERATION/

DECELERATION LANES
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 Horizontal curves or tangents and
low speed or high speed roadways
identified as having lane departure
collisions, sideswipe or head-on
collisions that can be attributed to
an existing pavement width less
than 10 feet.

Roadways having a high frequency
of drivers being rear-ended while
attempting to make a left turn
across oncoming traffic. Also can
be effective for drivers crossing
the centerline of an undivided
multilane roadway inadvertently.

WIDEN LANE (INITIALLY LESS THAN
10 FEET) ADD TWO-WAY LEFT-TURN LANE
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
25% 25% 30%
20 CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Low Medium OPPORTUNITY Medium
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 137
Roadways that have a frequent
incidence of vehicles leaving
the travel lane resulting in an
unsuccessful attempt to reenter
the roadway. The probability of
a safe recovery is increased if an
errant vehicle is provided with an
increased paved area in which to
initiate such a recovery.

Roadway curves noted as having
frequent lane departure collisions
due to inadequate or no shoulders,
resulting in an unsuccessful
attempt to reenter the roadway.

Areas noted as having a higher
frequency of head-on, left-turn,
and rear-end collisions with traffic
volumes that can be handled by
only 2 free flowing lanes. Using this
strategy in locations with traffic
volumes that are too high could
result in diversion of traffic to routes
less safe than the original four-lane
design.

WIDEN SHOULDER CURVE SHOULDER WIDENING
(OUTSIDE ONLY)

ROAD DIET (REDUCE TRAVEL LANES

AND ADD A TWO WAY LEFT-TURN

AND BIKE LANES)
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
35% 30% 45%
20 20 20

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Medium Medium Medium
138
Roadways with horizontal curves that
have experienced lane departure
collisions as a result of a roadway
segment having compound curves or
a severe radius. This strategy should
generally be considered only when
less expensive strategies involving
clearing of specific sight obstructions
or modifying traffic control devices
have been tried and have failed to
ameliorate the crash patterns.

IMPROVE HORIZONTAL

ALIGNMENT (FLATTEN CURVES)
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 The target for this strategy is usually
unsignalized intersections with
restricted sight distance due to
vertical geometry and with patterns of
collisions related to that lack of sight
distance that cannot be ameliorated by
less expensive methods. This strategy
should generally be considered only
when less expensive strategies involving
clearing of specific sight obstructions
or modifying traffic control devices
have been tried and have failed to
ameliorate the crash patterns.

Roadways noted as having frequent
lane departure collisions and
inadequate or no super elevation.

Safety can be enhanced when the
super elevation is improved or restored
along curves where the actual super
elevation is less than the optimal.

FLATTEN CREST VERTICAL CURVE IMPROVE CURVE SUPER ELEVATION Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
50% 25% 45%
20 CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Low Low OPPORTUNITY Medium
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 139
Additional or new signage with
fluorescent sheeting can address
collisions caused by lack of driver
awareness or compliance of roadway
signing, especially at night.

Installing chevron signs on roadways
with an unacceptable level of collisions
on relatively sharp curves during
periods of light and darkness can
improve driver awareness of upcoming
curves and help prevent run-off-road
collisions.

One-way streets can offer improved
signal timing and accommodate oddspaced signals. One-way streets can simplify crossings for pedestrians,
who must look for traffic in only one
direction. While studies have shown
that conversion of two-way streets to
one-way generally reduces pedestrian
collisions and the number of conflict
points, one-way streets tend to have
higher speeds which creates new
problems.

INSTALL/UPGRADE SIGNS WITH

NEW FLUORESCENT SHEETING
(REGULATORY OR WARNING)

INSTALL CHEVRON SIGNS ON

HORIZONTAL CURVES

CONVERT FROM TWO-WAY TO

ONE-WAY TRAFFIC
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
35% 15% 40%
20 10 10

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY Medium Very High Very High
140
Installing curve advance warning signs,
which may also include horizontal
alignment and/or advisory speed
warning signs, can improve driver
awareness of upcoming curves and
help prevent run-off-road collisions.

INSTALL CURVE ADVANCE

WARNING SIGNS
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 Installing curve advance warning signs
with flashing beacons on roadways
with an unacceptable level of collisions
on relatively sharp curves can improve
driver awareness and reduce the risk
of run-off-road collisions. However,
the use of flashing beacons should be
limited to curves with a severe crash
history to maintain their effectiveness.

Curvilinear roadways that have an
unacceptable level of collisions due to
excessive speeds on relatively sharp
curves may benefit from the addition
of dynamic/variable speed warning
signs (also known as Radar Speed
Feedback Signs).

INSTALL CURVE ADVANCE

WARNING SIGNS (FLASHING

BEACON)

INSTALL DYNAMIC/VARIABLE

SPEED WARNING SIGNS
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
25% 30% CRF 30%

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Very High High OPPORTUNITY High
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 10
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 141
Installation of delineators, reflectors
and/or object markers are intended to
warn drivers of an approaching curve
or fixed object that cannot easily be
removed.

Any road with a history of runoff-road right, head-on, oppositedirection-sideswipe, or run-off-roadleft collisions is a candidate for edge line or centerlines should be installed
where the existing lane delineation is
not sufficient to assist the motorist in
understanding the existing limits of
the roadway. Depending on the width
of the roadway, various combinations of
edge line and/or center line pavement
markings may be the most appropriate.

With the goal of improving drivers
speed compliance while making
streets safe, vehicle speed feedback
signs use radar to ascertain the speed
of the vehicle and provide information
through LED signs.

INSTALL DELINEATORS, REFLECTORS

AND/OR OBJECT MARKERS

INSTALL EDGE LINES AND

CENTERLINES VEHICLE SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
30% 15% 25%
10 10

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY High Very High Very High
10 142
For roadways that have a high
percentage of head-on collisions
that suggest many head-on
collisions may relate to failed
passing maneuvers, no-passing
lines should be installed where
drivers “passing sight distance” is
not available or hindered due to
horizontal or vertical obstructions.

INSTALL NO-PASSING LINE
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 Center Line rumble strips/stripes
can be used on virtually any
roadway – especially those with a
history of head-on collisions.

Shoulder and edge line milled
rumble strips/stripes should be
used on roads with a history of
roadway departure collisions.

INSTALL CENTERLINE RUMBLE

STRIPS/STRIPES

INSTALL EDGE LINE RUMBLE

STRIPS/STRIPES
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
45% 20% CRF 15%

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Very High High OPPORTUNITY High
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 10
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 143
Separated bike lanes are most
appropriate on streets with high
volumes of bike traffic and/or high
bike-vehicle collisions, typically in an
urban or suburban area. Separation
types range from simple, painted
buffers and flexible delineators,
to more substantial separation
measures including raised curbs,
grade separation, bollards, planters,
and parking lanes.

This is an easy to maintain, cost
effective measure, created with
paint, epoxy, thermoplastic, or
colored asphalt used to designate
bike lanes, bike boxes, bike conflict
zones or intersection crossings.

Installing bike lanes on roadway
segments noted as having
collisions between bicycles and
vehicles, or collisions that may be
preventable with a buffer/shoulder,
can significantly improve bicycle
safety and reduce the risk of these
types of collisions.

INSTALL SEPARATED BIKE LANES GREEN PAVEMENT FOR BICYCLE

FACILITIES INSTALL BIKE LANES
Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: Bicycle 35% 45% 40%
20 10

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH
OPPORTUNITY High High High
20 144
Areas noted as not having adequate
or no sidewalks and a history of
walking along roadway pedestrian
collisions. In rural areas asphalt curbs
and/or separated walkways may be
appropriate.

INSTALL SIDEWALK/PATHWAY
(TO AVOID WALKING ALONG

ROADWAY)
Crash Type: P & B
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
When incorporated with a pedestrian
refuge island and appropriate signage
and advance warning, mid-block
crossings may increase safety by
decreasing random and unexpected
pedestrian crossings while allowing
drivers to predict and expect pedestrian
traffic.

Installing raised pedestrian crossings
on lower-speed roadways where
pedestrians are known to be crossing
roadways involving significant vehicular
traffic can improve pedestrian visibility,
slow traffic, and reduce the risk of
pedestrian-vehicle collisions.

MID-BLOCK CROSSWALKS INSTALL RAISED PEDESTRIAN

CROSSING
Crash Type: P & B Crash Type: P & B
CRF 35%

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH High OPPORTUNITY
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 10 20
80% 25%
Medium Medium
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 145
Installing animal fencing at locations
with high percentages of vehicularanimal collisions (reactive) or where there is a known high percentage of
animal crossings due to migratory
patterns (proactive) can significantly
reduce the frequency and severity of
these collisions.

INSTALL ANIMAL FENCING
Crash Type: Animal
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
20 80%
Medium
Prioritize educational initiatives
while issuing citations during traffic
enforcement by actively seeking
opportunities to provide educational
resources.

Design a traffic safety diversion
program specifically for bicycle and
pedestrian traffic violations, with the
primary goal of facilitating access to
safety courses and programs centered
on biking and walking.

EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES OVER

CITATIONS

TRAFFIC SAFETY DIVERSION

PROGRAM
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All

CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

N/A N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
20 ADDITIONAL COUNTERMEASURES
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
146
High-Visibility Crosswalk Markings
use distinctive patterns (like bar pairs,
continental, or zebra stripes) to make
pedestrian crossings more noticeable
to drivers, increasing driver recognition
distance and improving pedestrian
safety.

HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSWALK

MARKINGS
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
Speed limits are established with an
engineering study based on inputs
like traffic volumes, operating speeds,
roadway characteristics, and crash
history. However, conditions on the
roadway are susceptible to change in a
short amount of time (e.g., congestion,
collisions, weather).

Agencies can use Speed Safety Cameras
(SSCs) as an effective and reliable
technology to supplement more
traditional methods of enforcement,
engineering measures, and education
to alter the social norms of speeding.

VARIABLE SPEED LIMITS SPEED SAFETY CAMERAS
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 147
A red light camera is a form of
automated enforcement of traffic
safety laws. Red light cameras
photograph a vehicle’s license plate
if the driver fails to stop at a red light,
and the vehicle owner or driver is sent
a ticket. Red light cameras should be
used to aid traditional enforcement
efforts or in locations where traffic
stops are impractical or unsafe.

The SafetyEdgeSM technology
shapes the edge of the pavement
at approximately 30 degrees from
the pavement cross slope during the
paving process. This safety practice
eliminates the potential for vertical
drop-off at the pavement edge, has
minimal effect on project cost, and
can improve pavement durability by
reducing edge raveling of asphalt.

Access management refers to the
design, application, and control of entry
and exit points along a roadway. This
includes intersections with other roads
and driveways that serve adjacent
properties.

CORRIDOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT RED LIGHT VIOLATION CAMERAS SAFETY EDGE Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
148
There is broad consensus among
global roadway safety experts that
speed control is one of the most
important methods for reducing
fatalities and serious injuries. Speed is
an especially important factor on nonlimited access roadways where vehicles and vulnerable road users mix.

APPROPRIATE SPEED LIMITS FOR

ALL ROAD USERS
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
Reduction in speed limits in school
zones brings significant safety benefits
by reducing vehicular speeds and fatal
and injury collisions.

Speed tables are extended and wide
speed humps with a flat top that may
include a pedestrian crossing. Speed
cushions are traffic calming devices
that reduce vehicle speeds, and can
be speed humps or speed tables with
wheel cutouts for large vehicles. They
are often used on emergency response
routes.

REDUCED SPEED SCHOOL ZONE SPEED CUSHIONS, SPEED HUMPS

AND SPEED TABLES
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
30% CRF 30%

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)
SYSTEMIC APPROACH Medium OPPORTUNITY High
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
10 10
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 149
Expand the Safe Routes to School
Program to include Vision Zero
Training material for students, parents
and teachers.

Create a Rapid Response Safety
Communication Protocol for Vision
Zero. Implement a communication
plan that addresses recent severe and
fatal collisions, with a specific focus on
promoting traffic safety and healthconscious behaviors to the community.

Create and actively implement a
branding, promotional, and educational
campaign for Vision Zero to enhance
knowledge and understanding of
its principles. Work together with
community organizations to distribute
materials, spread messages, and
organize public events that promote
active transportation and transit as
responsible choices.

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL

PROGRAM

RAPID RESPONSE SAFETY

COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
150
Implement additional Safe Routes
educational programming to include
Safe Routes to Parks, Safe Routes for
Seniors and Safe Routes for People
with Disabilities to prioritize vulnerable
population.

HIGH-VISIBILITY CROSSWALK

MARKINGS
Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
Partner with School District to distribute
targeted Vision Zero messaging for
students and employees.

Develop a Vision Zero Training Manual
and integrate Vision Zero traffic safety
awareness and education into training
employees who drive City vehicles
on a daily basis or drive while on City
business.

COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP VISION ZERO TRAINING MANUAL
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY
CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 151
Long-term, tailored, and specialized
treatment programs can serve as an
opportunity to assess drinking habits
and refer them for brief interventions
or specialized treatment.

Direct traffic enforcement efforts
to prioritize the most critical highinjury corridors identified in the City’s Vision Zero Action Plan. Concentrate
enforcement activities in areas of City
where engineering and educational
initiatives have already been
implemented.

Create a Share the Road Awareness
Program for motorists, bicyclists and
pedestrians that is easily accessible.

ALCOHOL USE DISORDER (AUD)

ASSESSMENT & TREATMENT

PROGRAMS

HIGH VISIBILITY ENFORCEMENT SHARE THE ROAD AWARENESS

PROGRAM
Crash Type: All Crash Type: All Crash Type: All

CRF CRF CRF

EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS) EXPECTED LIFE (YEARS)

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

SYSTEMIC APPROACH

OPPORTUNITY

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A

N/A N/A N/A
Note: N/A refers to Not Applicable
152
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 153
Safety Projects

CHAPTER SIX
154

SAFETY PROJECTS
This chapter outlines a comprehensive and data driven strategy to reduce traffic collisions including fatalities and serious injuries within the City of Pico Rivera. Guided by the principles of the Safe System approach and informed by detailed collision analysis covering collisions occurred from January 2020 to December 2024, the recommended projects translate identified safety challenges into targeted and implementable improvements.

The proposed location specific countermeasures respond directly to documented collision trends, including a high occurrence of broadside collisions, unsafe speed violations, vehicle to pedestrian conflicts, nighttime safety concerns, and right of way violations at signalized and unsignalized intersections. These recommendations also reflect the priorities identified through stakeholder engagement and community feedback.

To address these safety concerns effectively, the CSAP organizes recommended improvements into two categories:

Together, these approaches provide a balanced framework that addresses both widespread risk factors across the transportation network and location specific collision patterns along high injury corridors and intersections. This strategy enables the City to strengthen overall network safety while prioritizing investments in areas where they will have the greatest impact. The projects identified in this CSAP are preliminary in nature and are intended to provide conceptual guidance; they will be subject to further engineering evaluation, feasibility review, community outreach, and detailed design during future project development.

SYSTEMIC PROJECTS

DESIGN PROJECTS
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 155
Systemic projects consist of citywide initiatives designed to address recurring collision risk factors through consistent improvements across the transportation network. Rather than focusing on individual locations, these projects target common deficiencies that contribute to collisions throughout the City, such as uncoordinated signal timing, insufficient pedestrian infrastructure at transit stops, inadequate intersection controls, and inconsistent roadway visibility.

In Pico Rivera, systemic projects were identified based on recurring collision patterns observed in the five year collision analysis. Key trends included intersection related collisions accounting for 84 percent of KSI collisions, nighttime collisions representing 49 percent of all KSI collisions, unsafe speed violations as the leading contributing violation category, and collisions involving pedestrians and other vulnerable road users. Community input reinforced these findings, with residents highlighting concerns related to speeding, intersection safety, and stop sign violations.

The systemic projects recommended in this CSAP include:

SYSTEMIC PROJECTS
Bus / Transit Safety Improvements
Citywide Signal Coordination
Unsignalized Intersection Improvements
Project
Project
Project
1 3
4 156
While systemic projects address network wide risks, design projects focus on specific corridors, intersections, and school zones where collision concentrations and operational challenges are more pronounced. These targeted improvements respond to unique roadway conditions, traffic patterns, surrounding land uses, and multimodal travel demands.

Design projects were identified through detailed evaluation of collision history, roadway characteristics, and community identified safety concerns. High injury corridors and areas near schools were prioritized due to their disproportionate share of severe collisions and their importance within the City’s transportation network.

The design projects recommended in this CSAP include:

DESIGN PROJECTS
Safe Routes to Schools
Improve Safety at Horizontal Curve:

Paramount Boulevard at Gallatin Road
Paramount Boulevard Safety Improvements
Bicycle Safety Improvements
Beverly Road Corridor Improvements
Project
Project
Project
Project
Project
2 5
6 7
8 Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 157

INTEGRATED SAFETY STRATEGY
Together, systemic and design projects form a comprehensive safety framework for the City of Pico Rivera. Systemic projects address widespread collision risk factors across the network, while design projects focus resources on high injury corridors and intersections with documented safety concerns.

This integrated strategy ensures that safety investments are both proactive and responsive.

Systemic improvements help prevent future collisions by correcting common roadway deficiencies, while design projects address locations with demonstrated collision history. By combining detailed data analysis, engineering best practices, and community input, Pico Rivera establishes a strategic roadmap for reducing fatalities and serious injuries across the transportation network.

As part of this effort, eight priority projects have been identified to address the most critical collision patterns and community identified safety concerns throughout the City.

These corridors and locations account for a significant share of injury and KSI collisions within the City. The corridors identified along the High Injury Network collectively represent a disproportionate share of all KSI collisions citywide, underscoring the need for focused safety investments. School areas were also prioritized due to the presence of vulnerable users including children, pedestrians, and bicyclists.

Design projects include tailored countermeasures such as upgraded signal hardware and timing, high visibility crosswalks, curb extensions, high friction surface treatments, protected bicycle lanes, improved street lighting, and enhanced signage and pavement markings.

Unlike systemic projects, which improve safety across the network, design projects provide targeted solutions in locations where data indicates elevated safety risks. These interventions aim to reduce both the frequency and severity of collisions while improving accessibility, connectivity, and user comfort.
158
While all projects identified in the CSAP address important safety needs, a structured prioritization framework should be used to guide implementation and ensure that investments align with the CSAP’s safety goals and objectives. This framework supports transparent, data-driven decisionmaking and helps the City focus resources on projects that will have the greatest impact on reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries.

The High Injury Network (HIN) provides the foundation for identifying corridors and intersections with the greatest safety risks in Pico Rivera. Building on this analysis, the project prioritization process evaluates and ranks potential improvements within these high-risk locations to ensure that investments are directed toward projects with the greatest potential to reduce fatalities and serious injuries.

The CSAP recommends evaluating and prioritizing projects using a set of key criteria that reflect safety performance, community needs, and implementation considerations. These criteria include:
• Safety Benefits
• Benefit to Vulnerable Road Users
• School Safety Impact
• Underserve Area Impact
• Community Input and Support
• Ease Of Implementation
In this prioritization methodology, each project is scored based on these criteria, and weighted scores are used to establish overall project priority. In cases where projects receive similar scores, additional factors such as collision severity, location within the High Injury Network (HIN), and implementation readiness are used to further differentiate priorities.

Projects that include multiple improvements along a corridor are grouped under a single priority ranking, with individual elements identified as sub-projects (e.g., A, B, C). For corridors where improvements can be implemented in phases, projects that are lower-cost, easier to implement, or provide immediate safety benefits may be advanced first, while more complex improvements are programmed for later phases. For example, striping, signage, and signal timing changes may be implemented in the near term, while larger capital improvements such as roadway reconfiguration or complete street treatments may require additional planning, design, and funding.

PROJECT PRIORITIZATION
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 159
The prioritized project list is intended to serve as a flexible implementation guide. The City may advance projects based on funding availability, coordination with other planned improvements, or emerging safety needs. Additionally, individual elements of a project may be implemented independently as opportunities arise.

Cost estimates provided in the CSAP are planning-level estimates based on current data and typical construction costs. Actual costs may vary depending on site-specific conditions, design requirements, and market factors.

The following sections present each project in greater detail, including summaries of collision data, maps illustrating safety project locations and collisions, and recommended countermeasures.

The preliminary cost estimates for each projects are included in Appendix G to support project development and funding applications.

PROJECT PRIORITIZATION METHODOLOGY
Safety Benefits
Evaluates the severity and frequency of collisions at the project location using a severity index based on collision data. Higher-risk locations receive higher scores.
30 percent
Benefit to
Vulnerable Road
Users
Projects that improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and persons with disabilities receive higher scores. 15 percent School Safety
Impact
Projects located near schools or along key school routes receive higher priority due to the presence of students and increased pedestrian activity.
15 percent
Underserve Area
Impact
Considers how projects support safe and accessible
transportation options across the historically underserved community, particularly for users who rely on walking, biking, and transit.
10 percent
Community Input
and Support
Reflects feedback received through public outreach, stakeholder engagement, and prior planning efforts. 10 percent
Ease of
Implementation
Assesses project complexity, with higher scores assigned to projects that can be implemented quickly and cost-effectively (e.g., striping, signage), and lower scores for projects requiring significant design, right-of-way, or construction.
20 percent
Criteria Description Weight
Total: 100 percent
160

BUS/TRANSIT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT ONE
Pico Rivera is served by multiple Metro bus lines operating along major arterials including Rosemead Boulevard, Whittier Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, and Telegraph Road.

Pedestrians accessing these transit stops must navigate intersections with limited crosswalk visibility, inadequate lighting, and aging bus stop infrastructure that does not meet current ADA accessibility standards. Many of these stops are located adjacent to commercial centers and residential neighborhoods where pedestrian activity is consistently high. This project will improve safety conditions at 13 bus stop locations across the City by enhancing pedestrian crossing infrastructure and transit stop amenities, reducing vehicle to pedestrian conflicts, and improving the overall accessibility and comfort of the transit network for all users.

High Visibility
Crosswalk
Stripping &
Pavement
Upgrades
Mid-Block
Crossing
Upgrade Bus
Stop Bench
with Shed Roof
Add Curb
Ramp
Estimated Project Cost
$750K - $950K
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations Note: Two collisions involve other modes As of May 2026
Broadside
Rear End
Nighttime
Unsafe Speed
50 Collisions
35 Collisions
36 Collisions
34 Collisions
45%
31%
32%
30%
3 2
1 4

SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
TRENDS

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
MODE
112
Total
Collision
3(3%)
Fatal
17(15%)
Severe Injury
48(43%)
Complaint of Pain
44(39%)
Visible Injury
82 Collisions
6 Collisions
14 Collisions
2 Collisions
6 Collisions
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 161

BUS/TRANSIT SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
162

SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOLS

PROJECT TWO

SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
The Pico Rivera Unified School District serves numerous school campuses distributed across residential neighborhoods throughout the City, generating significant volumes of pedestrian and bicycle activity by children during morning and afternoon peak periods. Walking routes to schools including those near Beverly Boulevard, Rosemead Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, and Passons Boulevard pass through intersections with limited crosswalk visibility and insufficient signage to alert drivers to the presence of young pedestrians. This project will improve safety along nine school adjacent intersections and corridors by increasing driver awareness of school zones and enhancing pedestrian crossing conditions, reducing the risk of vehicle to pedestrian collisions in areas where children are most vulnerable.

High
Visibility
Crosswalk
High
Friction
Surface
Treatments
Striping
Upgrades
School
Zone
Warning
Signs
Crosswalks Centerlines ADA Curb
Ramps
Sidewalks
Broadside
Automobile Right Of Way
Nighttime
Unsafe Speed
246 Collisions
169 Collisions
207 Collisions
155 Collisions
49%
24%
39%
22%
1 3
2 4
Estimated Project Cost
$18M - $19M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
TRENDS
MODE
34 Collisions
4 Collisions
3 Collisions
1 Collisions
9 Collisions

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
51 Total
Collision
2(4%)
Fatal
9(18%)
Severe Injury
16(31%)
Complaint of Pain
24(47%)
Visible Injury
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 163

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS
164

CITYWIDE SIGNAL COORDINATION

PROJECT THREE
Intersections account for 84 percent of all KSI collisions in Pico Rivera, and both KSI and injury collisions peak between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. when signal performance has the greatest influence on driver behavior and traffic flow. The City’s signalized network spans major arterials including Beverly Boulevard, Whittier Boulevard, Rosemead Boulevard, Paramount Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Washington Boulevard, Telegraph Road, and Durfee Avenue, which together carry the majority of citywide vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle travel. Outdated signal controllers, inefficient timing plans, and the absence of accessible pedestrian push buttons at many locations contribute to right of way conflicts and broadside collisions. This project will upgrade and coordinate 36 signalized intersections across the City, improving operational efficiency, reducing intersection conflicts, and enhancing pedestrian safety along the High Injury Network.

SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
Estimated Project Cost
$3.5M - $4M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
Broadside
Rear End
Nighttime
Unsafe Speed
99 Collisions
78 Collisions
85 Collisions
63 Collisions
40%
31%
34%
25%
1 3
2 4
TRENDS

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
249
Total
Collision
5(2%)
Fatal
37(15%)
Severe Injury
95(38%)
Complaint of Pain
112(45%)
Visible Injury
MODE
203
Collisions
8 Collisions
12 Collisions
5 1
Collisions Collisions
19 Collisions
Note: One collisions involve other modes
Traffic Signal
Coordination
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 165

CITYWIDE SIGNAL COORDINATION
166

UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT FOUR
Numerous unsignalized intersections along and connecting to the City’s High Injury Network corridors operate with limited traffic control, creating conditions where stop sign violations and uncontrolled vehicle conflicts elevate collision risk. Key locations along Paramount Boulevard, Rosemead Boulevard, Beverly Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Durfee Avenue, and San Gabriel River Parkway exhibit documented safety concerns including inadequate sight distance, poor nighttime visibility, and the absence of formal pedestrian crossing facilities. Several of these locations serve residential neighborhoods with access to schools, parks, and commercial areas, generating significant pedestrian and bicycle activity that is inadequately protected under existing conditions.

This project will address 14 unsignalized intersections across the City by improving intersection geometry, visibility, and pedestrian crossing conditions to reduce broadside and vehicle to pedestrian collisions at locations with insufficient traffic control.

Estimated Project Cost
$1.5M -$2.5M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
Broadside
Nighttime
Unsafe Speed
21 Collisions
16 Collisions
20 Collisions
16 Collisions
47%
36%
44%
36%
1 3
2 4
High
Visibility
Crosswalk
All Way
Stop
Control
Intersection
Sight
Distance
Striping &
Pavement
Upgrades
Streetlight
Upgrades
Advance
Warning
Signs
Pavement
Marking &
Limit Lines
Upgrade
Stop Signs
Curb
Extension
Median
Island/
Extension
Automobile Right Of Way

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
45 Total
Collision
3(7%)
Fatal
19(42%)
Severe Injury
3(7%)
Complaint of Pain
20(44%)
Visible Injury
TRENDS
MODE
30 Collisions
5 Collisions
6 Collisions
2 Collisions
2 Collisions
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 167

UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
168
IMPROVE SAFETY AT HORIZONTAL CURVE:

PARAMOUNT AT GALLATIN

PROJECT FIVE
The northern terminus of Paramount Boulevard at Gallatin Road presents a pronounced horizontal curve where the roadway geometry significantly changes alignment, reducing driver sight distance and creating conditions that elevate the risk of speed related collisions. Paramount Boulevard is the fourth ranked High Injury Network corridor in Pico Rivera, and this curve segment is located at the transition between the active corridor and Gallatin Road, a location where drivers may fail to anticipate the change in alignment. The surrounding area includes residential land uses and is in proximity to the City’s northern neighborhoods. This project will improve geometric safety at this curve by installing appropriate warning and delineation treatments that alert drivers to the alignment change, reduce operating speeds through the curve, and enhance nighttime visibility at this constrained roadway location.

Estimated Project Cost
$750K - $1M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
Hit Object
Rear End
Nighttime
Head On
Unsafe Speed
3 Collisions
1 Collisions
3 Collisions
1 Collisions
1 Collisions
100%
100%
33%
33%
33%
1 3
2 4
5 Striping Upgrade
Signage
Streetlight
Upgrades
Median

SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
3 Total
Collision
1(34%)
Severe Injury
1(33%)
Complaint of Pain
1(33%)
Visible Injury
TRENDS
MODE
3 Collisions
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 169
IMPROVE SAFETY AT HORIZONTAL CURVE: PARAMOUNT AT GALLATIN 170

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SIX
Paramount Boulevard is the fourth ranked High Injury Network corridor in Pico Rivera and serving as a primary north to south arterial connecting residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, and schools throughout the City. The segment between Washington Boulevard and Mines Street has been identified as lacking adequate roadway lighting, contributing to a significant share of nighttime collisions. Additionally, the intersections on Paramount Boulevard at Unser Street and Maxine Street currently are in need of traffic signals. This project will address both the lighting deficiency along the corridor and traffic signal at Unser Street and Maxine Street, improving safety for drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists along the corridor.

Estimated Project Cost
$3M - $3.5M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
Broadside
Rear End
Rear End
Nighttime
Unsafe Speed Violations
Unsafe Speed Violations
26 Collisions
10 Collisions
6 Collisions
12 Collisions
6 Collisions
5 Collisions
96%
37%
22%
44%
22%
19%
1 3
5 2
4 6
Streetlight
Upgrades
Install Traffic
Signal

SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
27 Total
Collision
2(7%)
Fatal
5(19%)
Severe Injury
8(30%)
Complaint of Pain
12(44%)
Visible Injury
TRENDS
MODE
21 Collisions
1 Collisions
1 Collisions
3 Collisions
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 171

PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Maxine St Maxine St
Fernadel Ave
Lowman Ave
Paramount Blvd
Samoline Ave
Vantor
0 50 100 200
US Feet
Collisions by Severity
Fatal
Severe Injury
Visible Injury
Complaint of Pain
Triton Dr
Silverette Dr
Phaeton Ave
Unser St
Paramount Blvd
Winodee Dr
Mary St
Haney St
Redbird Dr
Vantor
Paramount Blvd at Unser St
Paramount Blvd at Maxine St
172

BICYCLE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT SEVEN
Bicyclists account for 12 percent of all KSI collisions in Pico Rivera despite representing a smaller share of total roadway users, reflecting the disproportionate vulnerability of cyclists on the existing network. The City’s existing bikeway network includes Class I through Class IV facilities, but significant gaps and connectivity breaks remain along corridors such as Rosemead Boulevard, Beverly Boulevard, Washington Boulevard, Durfee Avenue, and several collector streets where bicycle collisions are concentrated. Many of these corridors provide access between residential neighborhoods, parks, schools, and the regional Rio Hondo and San Gabriel River bike paths, making them important active transportation routes for all ages. This project will expand and improve bicycle infrastructure along 14 roadway segments across the City, improving separation between vehicles and cyclists and enhancing connectivity to key destinations and the regional bikeway network.

Estimated Project Cost
$4.5M - 5M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
Broadside
Automobile Right of Way
Nighttime
Improper Turning
32 Collisions
13 Collisions
14 Collisions
19 Collisions
67%
27%
29%
9%
1 3
2 4
Class I Shared
Use Path
Class III Bike
Route
Class II Bike
Lane
Install Class
IV Separated
Bikeway

SAFETY IMPROVEMENT

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
48 Total
Collision
2(4%)
Fatal
11(23%)
Severe Injury
11(23%)
Complaint of Pain
24(50%)
Visible Injury
TRENDS
48 Collisions
MODE
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 173

BICYCLE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
174

BEVERLY ROAD CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT EIGHT
TRENDS

COLLISIONS BY SEVERITY
18 Total
Collision
Beverly Road serves as an east to west connector through residential neighborhoods in the northern portion of Pico Rivera, linking Durfee Avenue on the east to the western city limits and intersecting with Paramount Boulevard at the third highest injury intersection in the entire City.

The corridor passes through a predominantly residential area with proximity to parks and local schools, generating pedestrian and bicycle activity that is inadequately protected under existing roadway conditions. Broadside collisions and automobile right of way violations are the primary crash patterns documented along the corridor, and the existing roadway cross section lacks formal bicycle facilities along most of its length. This project will improve safety along Beverly Road by addressing intersection conditions, pedestrian crossing infrastructure, and bicycle access, reducing conflicts between roadway users and improving connectivity for residents accessing schools, parks, and the broader transportation network.

Estimated Project Cost
$2.5M - $3M
*See the Appendix G for detailed cost estimates and locations As of May 2026
Broadside
Traffic Signals & Signs
Automobile Right of Way
Nighttime
7 Collisions
4 Collisions
5 Collisions
4 Collisions
39%
22%
28%
22%
1 3
2 4
1(6%)
Fatal
2(11%)
Severe Injury
7(39%)
Complaint of Pain
8(44%)
Visible Injury
MODE
21 Collisions
1 Collisions
1 Collisions
3 Collisions
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 175

BEVERLY ROAD CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENTS
176
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 177
Policy & Process
Recommendations

CHAPTER SEVEN
178
This chapter includes policy recommendations that strategic direction for integrating traffic safety into the City of Pico Rivera’s planning, engineering, and development practices. They are grounded in a review of existing plans, policies, and regulatory frameworks that revealed meaningful gaps in the City’s formal policy architecture. Each recommendation is intended to complement the infrastructure improvements identified in this CSAP by ensuring that safety considerations are institutionalized across all transportation related decisions.

The City of Pico Rivera currently lacks a formal Complete Streets policy or resolution. The sole codified direction is a sentence in the 2014 General Plan Circulation Element, which calls for accommodating bicycle and pedestrian travel within roadway projects where feasible. This framing is discretionary and project specific, and does not establish a citywide design commitment. The City should adopt a standalone Complete Streets policy that affirmatively directs all transportation projects, from planning through construction, to accommodate the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and people of all abilities. The policy should establish Complete Streets as the default design approach rather than an elective consideration, positioning the City to align with state and federal expectations and to strengthen future grant applications.

California Assembly Bill 43, signed into law in 2021, grants local jurisdictions new authority to reduce posted speed limits in designated safety corridors, business activity districts, and school zones beyond what was previously permitted under the Engineering and Traffic Survey process. As of the adoption of CSAP, the City has not exercised this authority on any roadway. Given that unsafe speed was identified as a primary contributing factor in a significant share of injury collisions across the city, and given that the 85th percentile speeds on several High Injury Network corridors exceed posted limits, this represents a significant untapped policy lever. The City should conduct an updated Engineering and Traffic Survey on priority corridors and evaluate the use of AB 43 authority to reduce speed limits in identified locations.

The City’s engineering design requirements are currently established through adoption by reference of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and the California MUTCD.

There are no citywide street design manuals or Standard Plans documents that have been published, tailored to Pico Rivera’s conditions. Title 12 of the Municipal Code still references the 1991 edition of standard specifications in some sections, creating internal inconsistency with current permitting requirements. The City should update its design standard references to reflect current editions, resolve the inconsistency in Title 12, and develop or formally adopt supplemental design

COMPLETE STREETS POLICY ADOPTION
SPEED LIMIT AUTHORITY UNDER AB 43

ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS & STREET DESIGN GUIDELINES Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 179
While the General Plan calls for multimodal accommodation in roadway projects, neither the Zoning Code nor the Subdivision Ordinance systematically requires Complete Streets improvements as a condition of new development or redevelopment. Frontage improvement requirements under Pico Rivera Municipal Code Section 17.32 address sidewalk installation in subdivisions but do not address bicycle facilities, accessible pedestrian signals, or crosswalk enhancements. A Comprehensive Zoning Code Update is currently underway, with a public review draft released in December 2024. The City should use this update as an opportunity to embed Complete Streets requirements into the development review and approval process, ensuring that private projects contribute to the citywide pedestrian and bicycle network and that new construction does not perpetuate gaps in the safety infrastructure.

The City operates a Safe Routes to School program in coordination with El Rancho Unified School District, providing suggested route maps and school area safety improvements. However, this program is not anchored by a Council resolution, a joint city district agreement, or school specific travel plans. No published walk audit reports or School Travel Plans are available for the schools within the program. The City should formalize the Safe Routes to School program through a Council resolution and a memorandum of understanding with El Rancho Unified School District that establishes shared responsibilities, performance expectations, and a process for regular school area safety reviews. The City should also develop School Travel Plans for priority schools, beginning with those located in or adjacent to the High Injury Network, to guide targeted infrastructure investments and education and encouragement programming.

The City operates a Safe Routes to School program in coordination with El Rancho Unified School District, providing suggested route maps and school area safety improvements. However, this program is not anchored by a Council resolution, a joint city district agreement, or school specific travel plans. No published walk audit reports or School Travel Plans are available for the schools within the program. The City should formalize the Safe Routes to School program through a Council resolution and a memorandum of understanding with El Rancho Unified School District that establishes shared responsibilities, performance expectations, and a process for regular school

COMPLETE STREETS REQUIREMENTS IN ZONING & SUBDIVISION STANDARDS

SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM FORMALIZATION

NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
guidelines that address multimodal street design, pedestrian infrastructure, bicycle facilities, and traffic calming. These standards will provide clear, consistent direction for both city projects and private development that affects the public right of way. 180
area safety reviews. The City should also develop School Travel Plans for priority schools, beginning with those located in or adjacent to the High Injury Network, to guide targeted infrastructure investments and education and encouragement programming.

The City contracts law enforcement services to the LA County Sheriff’s Department through the Pico Rivera Station, which provides all traffic enforcement within city limits. While the station maintains a Traffic Services Detail and participates in statewide Office of Traffic Safety programs, no formal mechanism exists for aligning enforcement priorities and deployment strategies with the collision patterns and profiles identified in this CSAP. The City should establish a formal traffic safety coordination framework with the Pico Rivera Sheriff’s Station, structured around an annual review of CSAP collision data and High Injury Network conditions. This framework will direct enforcement activity toward documented collision profiles including unsafe speed, and automobile right-of-way violations, and will establish shared reporting metrics to track progress. Formalizing this coordination will ensure that enforcement efforts reinforce, rather than operate independently of, the engineering and education strategies identified in this CSAP.

Pico Rivera is a predominantly low-income, majority-Latino community in which a significant share of residents rely on walking, bicycling, and transit for daily travel. Despite this context, no formal disadvantaged population framework or prioritization policy governs how transportation safety investments are screened, ranked, or targeted. The CSAP’s collision analysis confirms that pedestrian and bicycle injuries are disproportionately concentrated in the same geographic areas where lower-income households, older adults, and school-age children represent the largest share of road users. The City should adopt an underserved area-based prioritization policy for transportation safety investments that establishes explicit criteria for directing resources toward communities with the greatest exposure to traffic risk and the least capacity to absorb its consequences. This policy should guide project prioritization across the CIP, grant applications, and the implementation program of this CSAP, and should require that community engagement processes for future safety planning efforts actively reach populations that are historically underrepresented in public participation.

TRAFFIC SAFETY ENFORCEMENT COORDINATION WITH THE LA COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT

DISADVANTAGED AND VULNERABLE POPULATION PRIORITIZATION POLICY Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 181
To translate previously mentioned policy and process recommendations into measurable outcomes, the City has developed a comprehensive set of implementable actions that serve as a roadmap for achieving CSAP goals. Implementing the Pico Rivera CSAP requires coordinated effort across City departments, LA County partner agencies, and the local community. The actions outlined in this chapter represent a strategic and data-driven pathway toward the CSAP’s core goal of reducing overall traffic injury collisions citywide, with a sustained focus on eliminating fatal and severe injury (KSI) collisions.

Each action is assigned a timeline, a measurable performance metric, responsible partners, and a city resource level (Low, Medium or High). Actions are organized into five areas, and implementation timelines follow this framework:
• Short-Term: Within 2-3 years of plan adoption
• Mid-Term: 3 to 6 years
• Long-Term: 7 or more years
• On-Going: Continuous program or maintenance activity
The Implementable Actions are organized into the following five action areas:

1. CSAP Program Initiatives and Evaluation

2. Safe Roads

3. Safe Road User

4. Safe Speeds

5. Safe Vehicles and Emergency Response

IMPLEMENTABLE ACTIONS

CSAP PROGRAM INITIATIVES & EVALUATION
This action area establishes the organizational foundation for the CSAP. It focuses on building cross-departmental governance, securing sustainable funding, integrating safety into City policies and capital programming, and maintaining the data infrastructure needed to track progress over time. Success depends on ongoing data quality, transparent public reporting, and staff capacity to pursue and administer federal safety grants.
182
A.1
CSAP Project
Committee
Establish and maintain an
interdisciplinary CSAP Project
Committee comprising City
Public Works, Community
and Economic Development,
LA County Sheriff, LA County
Fire/EMS, and community
representatives to oversee plan
implementation, coordinate
inter-agency projects, and
ensure accountability toward
injury-reduction targets.

ShortTerm
Committee meets
quarterly; annual
workplan adopted;
percent of shortterm actions initiated
within 12 months of
plan adoption.

City Public Works;
Community
and Economic
Development; LA
County Sheriff;
LA County Fire/
EMS; Pico Rivera
Unified School
District
Low
A.2
Dedicated
Safety Funding
Stream
Develop and maintain a rolling
3-year grant pursuit calendar
identifying HSIP, SS4A, ATP,
and STBG Safety funding
cycles, application deadlines,
and required match. Assign
a staff lead or consultant to
coordinate grant applications
for prioritized HIN projects
and track federal obligation
deadlines.

ShortTerm
Annual budget
allocated to safety
improvements;
number of grant
applications
submitted per year;
total external funding
obligated.

City Public Works;
City Manager's
Office; City
Administrative
Services
Medium
A.3
Future Plans
& Policy
Integration
Integrate CSAP safety
performance measures, Safe
System design principles, and
HIN-based prioritization criteria
into the City's General Plan,
Capital Improvement Program
(CIP), Municipal Code, and
standard design guidelines at
each scheduled update cycle.

ShortTerm
Number of City plans
and policies updated
to reflect CSAP safety
metrics; adoption
of revised design
standards (crosswalk
spacing, signal
warrants, ADA ramp
details etc.).

City Public Works;
City Council
Low
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

CSAP PROGRAM INITIATIVES AND EVALUATION
Governance, funding, data quality, and performance monitoring to sustain CSAP implementation Table continued on next page
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 183
A.4
Interactive
Collision Map,
Website & GIS
Dashboard
Develop and maintain a
publicly accessible, GISbased collision dashboard
displaying injury trends
by corridor, collision type,
violation category, and
severity. Embed the HIN
map and a countermeasure
implementation tracker.

Enable city staff to generate
reports for City Council
presentations and grant
applications.

ShortTerm
Dashboard launched
within 18 months of
plan adoption; number
of visitors; data updated
periodically from TIMS/
SWITRS and LA County
Sheriff Department
records.

City Public
Works; LA
County
Sheriff
Medium
A.5
CommunityBased Safety
Reporting Tool
Implement an online and
mobile platform enabling
residents to report nearmiss incidents, sightline
obstructions, and unsafe
road conditions. Integrate
reports into the GIS database
and establish a response
protocol with defined review
timeframes.

Ongoing
Tool launched within
18 months; percent
of submitted reports
reviewed and assigned
within 30 days;
number of proactive
countermeasure
improvements initiated
from community input.

City Public
Works; LA
County
Sheriff
Medium
A.6
Crash Data
Quality
Program
Improve completeness and
reliability of crash data by
establishing a formal datasharing protocol between City staff and LA County Sheriff
for timely collision report
submission. Standardize
data fields to support HSIPcompliant systemic analysis, including pedestrian/bicycle
mode identification and
contributing factor coding.

ShortTerm
Percent of annual
collisions with complete
electronic records;
average lag between
collision date and TIMS
availability; formal datasharing agreement
adopted.

LA County
Sheriff;
City Public
Works; LA
County Fire/
EMS
Low
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

CSAP PROGRAM INITIATIVES AND EVALUATION
Governance, funding, data quality, and performance monitoring to sustain CSAP implementation Table continued on next page
184
A.7
Bicycle and
Pedestrian
Count Program
Establish permanent and
portable count locations on
HIN corridors (Rosemead,
Whittier, Paramount, Beverly,
Slauson) to track active
transportation volumes over
time. Use counts to calculate
exposure-adjusted collision
rates and to strengthen HSIP
and ATP grant applications.

ShortTerm
Minimum 5 count
locations established
on the CSAP HIN and
ATMP High Incident
Corridors (HIC);
annual count data
published; pedestrian
and bicycle exposure
rates calculated for
top 10 HIN and HIC
segments.

City Public Works;
LA Metro (Active
Transportation)
Medium
A.8
Annual CSAP
Progress Report
Publish an annual safety
performance report
tracking KSI collision
trends, countermeasure
implementation status, grant
outcomes, and progress
toward injury reduction targets.

Present a biennial update
to City Council addressing
metrics and performance
measures relative to CSAP
goals.

ShortTerm
Annual report
published and posted
publicly; biennial City
Council presentation
delivered; yearover-year change in
KSI and total injury
collisions; percent of
actions initiated on
schedule.

City Public Works;
LA County Sheriff;
City Manager's
Office
Low
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

CSAP PROGRAM INITIATIVES AND EVALUATION
Governance, funding, data quality, and performance monitoring to sustain CSAP implementation

SAFE ROADS
Safe Roads actions address the physical design, operations, and maintenance of Pico Rivera’s roadway network to reduce the frequency and severity of injury collisions. Collision data shows that 84 percent of KSI and 81 percent of injury collisions occur at intersections, with unsafe speed and automobile right-of-way violations as the leading contributing factors. The High Injury Network including, Rosemead Boulevard, Whittier Boulevard, Slauson Avenue, Paramount Boulevard, and Beverly Boulevard, will receive prioritized treatment through FHWA Proven Safety Countermeasures aligned with HSIP eligibility criteria.

End of Table
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 185
SR.1
HIN Capital
Improvements
Develop and implement
a phased capital project
list targeting the topranked HIN corridors and
intersections for engineering
improvements, including
intersection channelization,
signal upgrades, pedestrian
crossing improvements, and
road diet feasibility studies.

Prioritize locations based
on KSI concentration and
disadvantaged area screening.

Varies
Number of HIN
intersections and
segments receiving
capital improvements
annually; percent
reduction in KSI
collisions at treated
locations; projects
advanced to design
or construction.

City Public Works
(Engineering);
Caltrans District
7; LA Metro; LA
County
High
SR.2
Unsignalized
Intersection
Safety
Implement countermeasures
at high-priority unsignalized
intersections, including All-Way
Stop Control, HAWK Beacon
installations, Rectangular
Rapid Flashing Beacons
(RRFB), curb extensions, and
sight distance improvements.

ShortTerm
to
MidTerm
Number of
unsignalized
intersections
receiving treatments;
collision reduction
at treated locations
using published
CRFs; MUTCD
compliance rate.

City Public Works;
Caltrans District 7
Medium
SR.3
Pedestrian
Crossing
Enhancements
Install high-visibility crosswalk
markings, pedestrian
countdown signals, raised
crosswalks, curb ramp
upgrades, and Leading
Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) at
the highest pedestrian collision
intersections.

ShortTerm
to
MidTerm
Number of crosswalk
enhancements
installed; percent of
HIN intersections with
ADA-compliant curb
ramps; pedestrian KSI
collisions at treated
locations (before/
after).

City Public Works;
Pico Rivera
Unified School
District (near
schools)
Medium
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

SAFE ROADS
Street design, operations, and maintenance strategies to reduce injury collision frequency and severity Table continued on next page
186
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

SAFE ROADS
Street design, operations, and maintenance strategies to reduce injury collision frequency and severity Table continued on next page
SR.4
Bicycle Safety
Infrastructure
Design and implement
separated or protected bicycle
facilities on HIN corridors,
including buffered or protected
bike lanes, bike boxes,
protected signal phases, and
bicycle detection at signals.

MidTerm
to
LongTerm
Lane miles of new
or upgraded bicycle
facilities; number of
intersections with
bicycle detection;
bicycle KSI collisions
at treated locations.

City Public Works;
LA Metro Active
Transportation;
Caltrans District 7
High
SR.5
Traffic Signal
Optimization &
Upgrades
Audit and upgrade traffic
signal equipment, timing
plans, detection systems,
and Accessible Pedestrian
Signals (APS) on HIN corridors.

Transition aging signal
equipment to LED and update
to MUTCD standards.

ShortTerm
to
MidTerm
Number of signals
upgraded; percent of
City-owned signals
with current timing
plans; number of
APS devices installed;
reduction in rearend collisions on
optimized corridors.

City Public Works;
Caltrans District
7 (state route
signals)
Medium
SR.6
Intelligent
Transportation
Systems (ITS)
Deploy ITS technologies on
priority HIN corridors, including
adaptive signal control, vehicle
speed detection, pedestrian
detection cameras, wrong-way
driver detection, and dynamic
message signs. Leverage
LA County's existing ITS
infrastructure where available.

MidTerm
to
LongTerm
Number of ITS
technologies
deployed on HIN
corridors; reduction
in speed-related KSI
collisions at equipped
locations; corridor
travel time reliability.

City Public Works;
LA County ITS;
Caltrans District 7
High
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 187
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource
Table continued on next page

SAFE ROADS
Street design, operations, and maintenance strategies to reduce injury collision frequency and severity SR.7
Design
Standards
Update
Review and update City
design standards, standard
plan details, and development
review checklists to
incorporate FHWA Proven
Safety Countermeasures,
current MUTCD requirements,
Safe System principles, and
pedestrian facility standards.

Apply to all new projects and
major rehabilitation work.

Ongoing
Adoption of updated
design standards;
percent of new
transportation
projects reviewed
against updated
standards; number
of Proven Safety
Countermeasures
codified into City
standards.

City Public Works;
City Council
Low
SR.8
Tree Trimming
& Vegetation
Management
Conduct annual proactive
inspections of trees,
landscaping, and street
furniture at HIN intersections,
crossings, driveways,
and along sidewalks to
maintain minimum sight
triangles. Establish a priority
maintenance schedule for
locations associated with injury
collisions.

Ongoing
Number of sight
distance deficiencies
identified and
corrected annually;
percent of HIN
intersections with
current sight distance
clearance.

City Public
Works; City Parks
& Recreation
Department
Low
188
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

SAFE ROADS
Street design, operations, and maintenance strategies to reduce injury collision frequency and severity End of Table
SR.9
Pavement
Marking
& Signage
Maintenance
Develop a systematic inventory
and maintenance program
for pavement markings,
crosswalk thermoplastic,
stop bars, regulatory signs,
and warning signs on HIN
corridors. Prioritize refreshing
faded markings at high-injury
intersections as a quick-build
safety measure.

Ongoing
Percent of
HIN corridor
markings meeting
retroreflectivity
standards; number
of intersections
receiving marking
refresh annually;
MUTCD compliance
inspection schedule
established.

City Public Works
Medium
SR.10
Street Lighting
& Signal
Equipment
Maintenance
Conduct routine inspections
and timely repair of street
lighting, pedestrian-scale
lighting, traffic signals, and
pedestrian signal equipment.

Collision data shows 44
percent of KSI collisions
occur in dark conditions
with streetlights present
indicating that lighting quality
improvements are a direct KSI
reduction strategy.

Ongoing
Percent of lighting
and signal
maintenance
issues resolved
within 10 business
days; number of
streetlights upgraded
to LED on HIN
corridors; reduction
in nighttime KSI
collisions.

City Public
Works; Southern
California Edison
Medium
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 189
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource
Table continued on next page

SAFE ROAD USERS
Safe Road Users actions address education, enforcement, and encouragement that reduce highrisk behaviors and support safer travel choices for all roadway users. Collision analysis identifies unsafe speed (26 percent of KSI), automobile right-of-way violations (16 percent of KSI), and impaired driving as the primary behavioral contributors. Pedestrians and bicyclists represent a disproportionately high share of KSI collisions relative to their share of total injury collisions, highlighting the need for targeted vulnerable road user programs. Multilingual outreach is essential in Pico Rivera’s predominantly Spanish-speaking community.

SU.1
Safety
Education
Campaigns
Conduct targeted,
multilingual (English and
Spanish) safety education
campaigns addressing the
top KSI violation categories:
unsafe speed, failure to yield
at intersections, distracted
driving, and impaired driving.

Leverage social media,
community events, school
partnerships, and local
Spanish-language media.

Ongoing
Number of people
reached per
campaign; materials
produced in English
and Spanish; pre/post
awareness survey
results; annual trend
in targeted violation
category collisions.

City Public Works;
City Manager's
Office; LA County
Sheriff; Pico
Rivera Unified
School District
High
SU.2
Speed
Feedback Signs
Install and maintain dynamic
speed warning signs at
HIN corridor locations with
documented speeding
patterns (e.g. P85 ≥ 5 mph
above posted limit). Monitor
P85 operating speeds pre- and
post-installation to evaluate
effectiveness.

MidTerm
Number of speed
feedback signs
installed on HIN
corridors; reduction in
P85 operating speed
at sign locations;
percent of locations
achieving target
speed compliance.

City Public Works;
LA County Sheriff
Medium

SAFE ROAD USERS
Education, enforcement, and encouragement strategies to reduce injury collision risk 190
Table continued on next page
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

SAFE ROAD USERS
Education, enforcement, and encouragement strategies to reduce injury collision risk SU.3
Targeted
Outreach for
Impaired &
Distracted
Driving
Conduct targeted outreach to
discourage impaired driving at
corridors near alcohol-serving
establishments, special event
venues, and during late-night
peak collision hours. Partner
with LA County Sheriff on
coordinated DUI enforcement
operations at identified highrisk locations.

Ongoing
Number of targeted
outreach events and
DUI enforcement
operations conducted
annually; DUI-related
KSI collisions tracked
year-over-year.

LA County Sheriff;
City Manager's
Office; City
Community
and Economic
Development
Low
SU.4
High-Visibility
Enforcement
Implement a data-driven,
high-visibility enforcement
program at the top 10 injury
collision intersections and
corridors, targeting speeding,
red-light running, and failure
to yield to pedestrians. Rotate
enforcement across HIN
locations on a scheduled basis
and coordinate with education
campaigns.

Ongoing
Number of
enforcement
operations per year
at HIN locations;
citations issued for
targeted violations;
annual collision trend
at enforced locations.

LA County Sheriff;
City Public Works
Low
SU.5
Safe Routes to
School Program
Partner with Pico Rivera
Unified School District to
develop and implement
Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
improvements, walking audits,
and educational programs for
schools. Prioritize engineering
as well as non-infrastructure
measures at the highest-injury
school access routes.

Ongoing
Number of schools
with completed
walking audits;
number of SRTS
improvements
implemented; schoolage pedestrian and
bicycle KSI collision
trend.

City Public
Works; Pico
Rivera Unified
School District;
LA Metro (SR2S);
Safe Routes
Partnership
Medium
Pico Rivera Comprehensive Safety Action Plan 191
Actions # Description Timeline Performance
Metric
Responsible
Partners
City
Resource

SAFE ROAD USERS
Education, enforcement, and encouragement strategies to reduce injury collision risk End of Table
SU.6
Underserved
Community
Outreach
Develop and deliver safety
outreach in coordination
with community-based
organizations serving
underrepresented residents,
including Spanish-speaking,
senior, and low-income
populations. Integrate
disadvantaged area impact
screening into CSAP project
prioritization to ensure HIN
improvements serve the
highest-need communities.

Ongoing
Number of community
engagement
events held in
underrepresentedpriority areas; materials
produced in Spanish;
percent of capital
projects located
in disadvantaged
community areas;
demographic analysis
of collision victims
updated annually.

City Manager's
Office; City
Community
& Economic
Development;
LA County Dept.
of Public Health
Low
SU.7
Senior and Youth
Road Safety
Programs
Develop targeted education
programs for seniors and youth
addressing their unique crash
risk profiles. Coordinate with
senior centers, libraries, and
the School District for program
delivery. Collision data shows
seniors and youth pedestrians
represent a disproportionate
share of pedestrian KSI
collisions.

Ongoing
Number of program
participants by age
group; collisions
involving seniors
(65+) and youth
(under 18) tracked
annually; partnerships
established with seniorserving facilities.

City Parks &
Recreation;
Senior Centers;
Pico Rivera
Unified School
District; LA
County Aging
and Community
Services
Low
SU.8
Bicycle Safety
Education &
Encouragement
Implement a citywide
bicycle safety education and
encouragement program
including adult cycling skills
classes, helmet distribution,
bicycle wayfinding signage,
and integration with LA
Metro's active transportation
programs.