Pinole City Council
June 10, 2024

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
April 2024
12 Table 4: Encouraged TDM Measures
TDM Strategy Description
Costs¹ Effectiveness
Range² One Time Annual

15. Bikeshare/Scooter-share
If bikeshare and/or scooter-share is provided
near the project site, provide annual membership
to employees.
$ $$ Low

16. Rideshare
Designate parking spaces for ridesharing vehicles
and/or designate an adequate passenger loading
zones and waiting areas for ridesharing vehicles.

Provide an app or website to coordinate rides.
$$ $ Low-Medium

17. Carshare If carshare is provided near the project site, provide annual membership to employees. $ $$ Low

18. Pre-Tax Transit Payroll
Deduction Option
Use programs such as WageWorks to help
employees pay for commuting expenses through
pre-tax payroll deductions towards transit passes.
$$ Low

19. Transit Subsidies Subsidize or reimburse employees for transit passes.
$-$$$ Low-Medium

20. Cash Allowances and
Rewards (Non-Transit)
Reward incentives for alternative commute
modes. $$ Low

21. Carpool Incentive
Program
Provide incentives for carpool/vanpool
commuters such as gas cards or bridge tolls
reimbursements.
$$ Low

22. Provide vanpool services
to major transit stations
Explore collaborating with other nearby
employers to provide vanpool services to the
Richmond or El Cerrito del Norte BART stations or
other areas where a high number of employees
live.
$$$-$$$$ Low-Medium
Notes:

1. Approximate cost ranges:
$ <$1,000
$$ $1,000 - $10,000
$$$ $10,000 - $100,000
$$$$ >$100,000

2. Approximate effectiveness in reducing SOV trips*:

Low <3%
Medium 3-8%
High >8%
*Due to inherent uncertainty in the effectiveness of any given TDM strategy, these values represent a reasonable range of effectiveness for strategies placed in each tier.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
April 2024
13 3. Monitoring and Reporting
It is important to ensure TDM measures are implemented and effective. Therefore, a monitoring program is necessary to measure the performance of the TDM plan based on the project non-SOV mode-use and corresponding automobile trip reductions. An annual commute program evaluation as described in this chapter will allow the project and the City to assess the effectiveness of the unique program designed for the project. The annual monitoring provides an opportunity for the project to assess the success of the TDM Plan and to make adjustments or revisions as needed to achieve the TDM Plan goal.

Annual Employee Commute Survey
The project shall conduct an employee commute survey (See Appendix A for a sample survey) that would last for five continuous weekdays to assess the employee commute mode shares and evaluate and ensure the success of the TDM Plan. The survey can be in-person and/or online and shall be administered to all site employees.

The project will encourage, support, and participate in the promotion and marketing of the annual employee survey. Survey data may be used to focus commuter marketing and the efforts of the TDM Coordinator(s) to maintain the project’s commitment to reduce vehicle trips at the site, as well as modify the implemented TDM measures to increase their effectiveness. The initial annual employee survey shall be conducted within one year of the project occupancy and subsequent surveys shall be conducted at the same time of the year as the initial survey.

Annual TDM Summary Report
The project shall submit an annual TDM summary report to the City of Pinole to document the effectiveness of the TDM Plan in reducing the SOV trips generated by the project and compliance with this TDM Plan. At minimum, the report shall consist of the following:

1. A description of the current TDM measures and services provided at the project, the level of use or participation of each measure (to the extent feasible), and compliance with the required and encouraged measures in the TDM Plan.

2. Results of the annual employee survey that quantify the mode split for site employees, the perception of the TDM Plan by the project employees, and compliance with the TDM Plan’s vehicle trip reduction goal. The survey results should focus on the weekday daytime employees.

3. Findings of the project compliance with the TDM reduction and participation goal. If the report findings show that the TDM reduction and/or participation goals have not been met, the project would work with City staff to identify modifications to the TDM Plan and if there are additional TDM measures the project could reasonably (financially and practically) implement to further improve the site’s TDM reductions and participation.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
April 2024
14 The Annual TDM Summary Report shall be submitted to the City after the completion of the annual employee commute survey. The reports subsequent to the first report shall include a comparison of the TDM measures and services and their effectiveness, as well as the mode split data, with the previous years.

No Expiration of TDM Plan or Programs
Ongoing implementation of all required TDM measures will continue with no expiration of this plan.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
April 2024
15 Appendix A – Sample Commute Survey
NOTE: Questions should be tailored by the project based on specific policies such as work schedules, available commuter benefits, available commute options, etc.

1. What is your home zip code?

2. What are your typical work hours?
a. Start time:
b. End time:

3. Thinking about last week, how did you get
to work on each of the following days? If
you used more than one, please indicate the
way for the longest part of your trip.
a. Monday:
b. Tuesday:
c. Wednesday:
d. Thursday:
e. Friday:
f. Saturday:
g. Sunday:

4. Thinking about last week, how did you leave
work on each of the following days? If you
used more than one, please indicate the way
for the longest part of your trip.
a. Monday:
b. Tuesday:
c. Wednesday:
d. Thursday:
e. Friday:
f. Saturday:
g. Sunday:

5. Thinking about last week, how often did you
leave work in the middle of the day to get
lunch or run errands?
a. Yes, multiple times a day
b. Yes, once a day
c. Yes, a few times a week
d. No, I did not leave the office during
the day

6. When you leave the office in the middle of
the day, how do you typically travel to get
lunch or run errands?
a. Private vehicle
i. Drove my own private
vehicle (Drive alone)
ii. Drove my own private
vehicle (Carpool)
iii. Passenger in a private
vehicle (Carpool)
b. Uber/Lyft/Taxi drop-off
c. AC Transit Bus
d. Bicycle
e. Walked
f. Bikeshare/E-scooter
g. Other: ____________

7. What is most important to you when you
choose how to get to work? (Select up to 3.)
a. Travel time
b. Cost
c. Convenience/flexibility
d. Reliability
e. Comfort/safety
f. Reducing pollution
g. Ability to make stops between
home and work
h. Stress

8. If you typically use a non-drive alone mode
to commute to work, how can we better
support your commute?
a. Company subsidy for transit
b. Company subsidy for vanpool
c. Company subsidy for biking or
walking
d. Lower parking rates for carpooling
e. Preferred parking for carpooling
f. Assistance using transit or biking
g. Assistance with
h. Flexible work schedule
i. Ride home in case of emergency
j. Incentive program (prizes or
contests)
k. Other: _________

9. If you normally drive alone to work, what are
your main reasons for doing so?
a. Need a car for work

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
April 2024
16 b. Need a car for personal use during
the work day
c. No reasonable transit option
d. No reasonable walking or biking
option
e. No options for carpooling
f. Need a car for errands or to
transport children
g. Cannot get home in an emergency
h. Cost of taking transit
i. Other: ___________

10. If you usually drive alone to work, which of
the following transportation options (other
than driving alone) would appeal most to
you? (Select up to 3.)
a. Carpooling
b. Vanpooling
c. Transit
i. BART
ii. AC Transit
d. Bicycling
e. Walking
f. Not interested in other
transportation options for
commuting
g. Other: _________

11. If you normally drive alone to work, what
would encourage you to use a non-drive
alone mode to commute to work? (Select up
to 3.)
a. Company subsidy for transit
b. Company subsidy for vanpool
c. Company subsidy for biking or
walking
d. Parking cash-out
e. Lower parking rates for carpooling
f. Preferred parking for carpooling
g. Assistance using transit or biking
h. Assistance finding carpool partners
i. Flexible work schedule
j. Ride home in case of emergency
k. Incentive program (prizes or
contests)
l. Other: _________

12. Do you have other comments about your
transportation options for commuting to
work?

PINOLE SHORES PHASE 2
830-848 SAN PABLO AVE. PINOLE, CALIFORNIA
FOR:

GRP SHORES, LLC
·
·
·
Exhibit C

102
105
IOb
101
124
121
135
140
I4b
14'1
150
151
152
153
154

KEYNOTES
PROPOSED DRIVEi--lAY, PER JURl5DIGTIONAL STANDARDS
GONGRETE PAVINe
PROPOSED LANDSC.APED AREA. SEE LAND5GAPINc5 PLANS
(N) SIDEWALK. SEE LAND5GAPIN5 PLANS FOR DEGORATIVE TREATMENT "4HERE OGC.UR5
EXTERIOR GONGRETE LANDINe
GONGRETE STAIR ON GRADE. TYPE "G"
PAINTED GONGRETE TILT-LIP SC.REEN i--lALL OR TRASH ENGLOSURE !;,!ALL. PAINT BOTH SIDES AND TOP OF !;,!ALL. SEE ARGHITEGTURAL DRAHINc55 FOR C.OLOR 5GHEDULE.

TRASH ENGLOSURE VII/ ROOF GOVERINe
2 POSITION BIKE RAGK BY "DERO ROUNDRAGK" - PARKING FOR 1 BIKES PROVIDED PER GITY REGUIRMENT OF 5511 OF TOTAL PARKINS 5PAGE5
GONGRETE TRUGK RAMP VIII 42" HIGH GONGRETE TILT-UP GUARD ON OPEN 5IDE(5).

PAINT ALL SIDES OF GUARD i--lA;,6 AND HANDRAILS. SEE ARGHITEGTURAL DRAHINc55 FOR GOLOR 5GHEDULE.

STEEL PIPE ElOLLARD PROTEGTION POST
20' HIDE MIN. FIRE LANE HITH 14' VERTIGAL GLEARANGE. DRIVEi--lAY 15 EITHER 30' OR 24' HIDE ALL AROUND SUILDING AND HAS :.e• MIN INSIDE AND 4e' MIN OUTSIDE TURNING RADIUS TO MEET FIRE TRUGK MANUVERING REGUIRMENT5.

EDGE OF :20' HIDE FIRE LANE
FULL SIZE TRACTOR TRAILER PARKINe 5PAGE
FULL SIZE TRACTOR/TRAILER TURNINc5 ARG
;'
;'
;' ;' /
;' ;' \, j>-��
/ '(
/
62 I
I----,
t----1
1----
I
1 b:ii'-11"
I
1--
-
-1
. I .1
1---- .
55 54
47 46
la () z►
la() z►
I <(
�
IL
t
I
151
I
I
@
•
/
/ /
•
•
/
/
/
/
,,, 152
/
/
,,, 151
•
/
•
•
/
/
•
•
/
•
18 ci
������=.i::!�EV _
G
2 121t---- FIRE LANE
•
•
•
----1;� ---------------------:--� ,.� :·· '� .. -
•
•
•
§ ��;'I< MOVEMENTS ANt, f=IRE LANE SITE FLAN
•
•
•
;'
;'
/
•
•
•
•
•
•
f62
'/
------------
•
•
"( I
-...J
p lJ...
o,
I !\1;,
151

FIRE LANE - -
•
•
•
118
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L---"\ \
I
�I "I0'-8"
I
I
I
I
I
.

I .

I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ) :

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
-
"'" -
r G
r
II)
SITE LEcSENt,
LANDSC.APE AREA
BUILDINc5 AREA
:♦:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: VEBETATED FLO�-THRU PLANTER
•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:• BIOSWALE -SEE C.IVIL �INGS
■ ■ • PATH OF TRAVEL
- - - - PROPERTY LINE
- - - - - - 20' 1-<IDE (MINJ FIRE LANE • DOC,K HI5H DOOR • DRIVE THRJ.J DOOR PARKING SPAc;E LABl:LS,
SEE SHEET A-I.I FOR PARKING GALGULATION5
FOR REGIUIRED AND PROVIDED c.oMPAc;T, EV
READY, EVC,5, VANPOOL/GLEAN AIR AND
AC,C,E55I6LE SPAc;ES
C, -WMF'Ac;T SPAc;E
EVR - ELEC,TRIC, Vl:Hle,LE READY SPAc;ES
EVC,5 - aa TR.IC, VEHIC,LE C,HAA6INe

STATION PROVIDED
EVVA - ElEC,TRIC, VEHIC,LE VAN AC,C,E55I6LE

EVHC, - ELEC,TRIC, VEHIC,LE STANDARD
AC,C,E55I6LE
e,AN AN - c;LEAN AIR / VANPOOL
HC,- STANDARD AC,C,E55I6LE SPAc;E
FIRE DEPARTMENT NOTE:

FIRE DEPARTMENT GOA WILL BE

INGLUDED IN PLAN SET WHEN
THEY ARE PROVIDED BY GGGFD.
16':9'

STANDARD PARKING STALL

PER C,ITY REGIUIREMENT
TYP. AC,C,ESSIBLE PARKINe
STALL WITH 5'-0" AC,C,!:55

AISLE PER
C,BC, 2022 116-502.2
TYP. VAN AC,C,ESSIBLE
AC,C,E55
PARl<INe STALL WITH �'-0"
AISLE PER C.BC,
2022 116-502.2
�1 L_____:!
j lt'-9' j

C,LEAN AIR PARKING ST ALL,

IN THE PAINT USED FOR

STALL STRIPING, THE
FOLLOWINe C,HAR.Ac;TERS
SUC,H THAT THE LOl'<ER

EDGE OF THE LAST WORD
ALl5N5 WITH THE END OF
STALL STRIPING AND 15

VISIBLE BENEATH A

PARKED VEHIC,LE,

GLEAN AIR/

VANPOOL/EV
PER GALeREEN 5�.106.5.2.1
I

ELEC,TRIC, VEHIC,LE
•
iB
e,HARelNG STATION,
•
�
� EVC,5 STALL SHALL
• PROVIDE SURFAc;E
� 'I MARKING STATINe,
�; • ii i EV C,HARelNe
� � ONLY
....,....,.....,...........,.....,,,, .
� I
f IN LETTER 12" Hl5H MINIMUM . P........,_--"'-.,___,.....::., THE LOWER EDeE OF THE � .h LAST !'<ORD AlleNS WITH
I g 1;1 THE END OF STALL STRIPINe
D 1------� • • AND 15 VISIBLE BENEATH A
PARKED VEHIC,LE.

Ii PER e,ee, 2022 I I6-bl2.q
NOTE,
FI/T\JRE C,HARelNe 5PAc;E5
GIUALIFY A5 DE5I5NA TED
PARl<INe AS DESC,RIBED IN
5EC,TION 5.106.5.2 SHALL
PROVIDE SURFAc;E
MARKING STATINe,

GLEAN AIR/

VANPOOL/EV
TRACTO�RAILER MANUVERIN<5
0 �--
PATH or DVERHN«;
,:;::�...,==�==----=-....;==j;PiiATfiiH"ilFi1ri1RoiN�T�\11£ELiiiir"aaa:_ � �==�-

TRUGK MANUVERING DIAGRAM SHOWN REPPRESENTS

LARGEST LEGAL TRAGTOR AND TRAILER SIZES THAT
GOULD BE EXPEGTED ON SITE. TYPIGALL Y THE
TRAILERS WILL BE SHORTER THAN THE 51' FEET SHOWN
HERE. THE ARGS ON THIS DIAGRAM ARE FROM A v-lB-61

AASHTO DIAGRAM AND USED ON OUR SITE PLAN TO
GHEGK MANUVERING GLEARANGES.
rsvl5lone �
lllt4
arehlteete, plannere
.2"150 eamlno dlablo
eulte 1
10 i'lalnut creek., ea
"145"11
("1.25) .256--604.2
�u
� � 00 �
< < �
::C:ooZ
�
00 �
� � �
�o�
� =� 0 00 u
= � "' 00 � � ��o
� .. z o�== zo
� � �
TRUCI<.

Q
N
Q
�
00 �
Q
"'
�
Q
"'
�
Q
"'
�
I
Q
N
I
N
Q
z
�
<
MOVE:ME:NTS AND
!='I� LANE:

SITE: PL.AN
cira,;n
�H
c.neG-w
�H
"'"''"'
OS!leil:20:24
ac.ale

AS SHOV'IN
J'"' no.
:2soc=i
&neet
A2.IA

3 2
1

C1.00

BUILDING (119,226 S.F.) FF ELEV.=73.7
18 DOCK (HI-DOORS) C1.01

IMP-A
FF ELEV.=73.7 IMP-B IMP-C

IMP-D IMP-F IMP-I IMP-H IMP-G
BUILDING (119,226 S.F.)
18 DOCK (HI-DOORS) IMP-J
IMP-E
DMA-B1
DMA-A1
DMA-F1 DMA-B2 DMA-J1 DMA-B2 DMA-C1 DMA-C1 DMA-B2 DMA-C1 DMA-B2 DMA-B3 DMA-B3 DMA-C2 DMA-C2 DMA-D1 DMA-E1 DMA-D1DMA-D1 DMA-G2 DMA-G2 DMA-G1 DMA-I1 DMA-H1 DMA-H1 DMA-J2 DMA-J2 DMA-I2 DMA-I2 DMA-I2 DMA-I2 DMA-I2
DMA-H2
DMA-H2
DMA-H2 DMA-H2
DMA-H2
DMA-H2
DMA-H2 DMA-H2
DMA-G3
DMA-G3
DMA-G3
DMA-G3
DMA-J2 DMA-X2 DMA-X1 DMA-X1DMA-X1 DMA-X1
DMA-X1 DMA-X1 DMA-B3
DMA-B1 DMA-E1
DMA-E2 DMA-B2 DMA-X2 C2.01

C2.02

BUILDING (119,226 S.F.) FF ELEV.=73.7
18 DOCK (HI-DOORS) C3.01

BUILDING (119,226 S.F.) FF ELEV.=73.7
18 DOCK (HI-DOORS) C3.02

BUILDING (119,226 S.F.) FF ELEV.=73.7
18 DOCK (HI-DOORS) C3.03

S W E N PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE
L-1

S W E N CONCEPTUAL TREE
L-1.1 PLANTING PLAN

S W E N PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST PARKING STALL SHADING CALCULATIONS PARKING STALL SHADE L-2

L-3 PLANTING NOTES PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST

L-4 PRELIMINARY PLANT LIST

S W E N HYDRO-ZONE LAYOUT
L-5

L-6

W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 W4 S2 S2 S3 S3 S3 S3 S3 S5 S5 S2 S3 W4 W4 W4 1.1 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.5 3.0 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.3 4.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.9 3.6 3.8 2.9 2.7 2.5 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 2.9 2.3 3.6 4.0 3.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.3 1.8 5.9 5.8 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.1 6.6 8.5 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.1 4.7 7.5 8.5 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.3 4.6 5.9 3.4 3.1 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.9 1.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 3.7 3.9 1.7 1.9 1.2 1.5 1.7 2.2 3.0 3.4 3.1 2.2 2.2 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.1 2.8 3.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.0 3.2 4.1 4.1 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.0 5.3 6.3 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.3 4.8 7.9 1.3 1.3 1.2 3.6 6.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 2.5 1.1 1.1 2.5 3.6 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 1.5 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.1 2.3 1.1 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.0 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.7 3.7 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.7 3.8 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.4 3.3 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.0 2.1 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.8 2.3 2.7 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.5 3.2 4.0 4.4 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.8 1.6 3.6 5.7 7.0 1.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 3.4 6.2 9.0 1.1 1.5 1.8 5.1 8.0 8.9 1.6 1.9 2.7 3.5 3.4 5.8 6.9 5.4 1.6 2.0 3.0 4.0 2.2 3.6 4.6 4.0 3.0 1.6 1.9 2.8 3.8 1.3 2.4 3.1 3.1 2.6 1.5 1.8 2.5 3.0 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.3 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.5 1.4 1.4 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.7 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.0 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.2 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.5 2.2 2.3 2.4 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.6 2.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.7 2.1 3.1 3.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.7 2.3 3.5 4.0 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.7 2.2 3.2 1.3 1.6 2.1 1.5 1.7 2.1 1.4 1.6 2.4 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.3 1.3 1.7 2.2 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.2 1.5 2.0 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.3 1.7 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.3 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.8 2.2 1.4 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.8 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.5 2.2 1.4 1.3 1.2 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.7 3.3 3.8 3.5 2.9 2.9 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.3 2.6 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.3 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 2.5 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.3 2.9 2.5 3.0 3.0 2.3 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.3 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.3 1.3 1.4 1.9 2.5 2.9 1.4 1.5 2.0 2.9 3.3 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.6 2.9 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.6 1.5 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.2 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.9 3.2 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.7 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.5 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.0 1.6 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.4 1.8 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.7 1.3 3.5 2.9 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.9 1.6 1.2 1.9 0.8 2.3 2.7 1.5 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.6 1.0 3.4 3.4 2.9 2.0 2.4 2.7 0.9 3.0 2.9 1.8 2.4 2.5 0.8 2.3 1.9 1.4 0.7 0.4 2.0 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.1 1.4 0.9 1.9 1.5 2.0 1.6 2.4 1.8 3.0 2.0 3.9 2.7 2.3 3.3 2.6 3.8 2.8 4.6 2.9 3.2 2.4 2.9 2.8 2.7 5.1 5.6 3.3 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.5 4.2 1.9 2.2 3.0 1.7 1.9 2.7 1.5 1.7 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.8 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.4 1.7 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 2.2 2.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.4 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.3 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.3 2.1 1.8 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.9 2.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.2 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.2 0.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.1 0.8 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.8 1.2 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.6 1.2 1.3 0.8 2.0 2.1 0.8 2.5 2.6 0.8 3.0 2.9 0.7 2.6 0.7 2.1 1.6 1.5 1.5 2.5 1.7 2.2 3.0 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.3 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.2 1.6 2.2 2.7 2.8 2.3 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.2 2.8 2.8 1.6 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.3 4.0 3.1 2.0 5.7 4.3 2.7 5.9 3.9 7.1 5.2 2.4 7.7 6.1 3.3 7.6 6.3 4.1 6.2 5.9 4.4 2.9 3.4 4.6 4.8 4.1 2.1 3.0 3.3 3.5 3.3 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.0 4.7 3.9 8.3 5.1 8.1 6.6 9.3 7.8 5.9 9.4 8.4 6.8 8.4 8.4 7.1 6.8 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.9 1.3 2.2 1.7 1.4 2.6 2.1 1.9 1.6 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.1 3.4 3.0 2.6 4.4 3.7 3.3 2.8 5.7 4.9 4.2 3.6 7.5 6.6 5.6 7.4 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.2 2.2 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 9.3 9.5 8.2 6.3 7.0 4.7 3.6 2.7 2.0 2.2 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.2 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 0.9 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.5 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.6 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.6 2.4 1.8 1.5 1.6 2.4 1.7 1.7 3.7 2.0 1.8 5.5 3.2 2.0 5.3 2.5 1.6 2.0 7.0 2.6 1.6 2.0 6.1 2.9 2.0 7.1 4.6 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 5.5 3.2 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 3.8 2.1 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.4 3.8 2.6 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.8 2.0 1.4 1.3 1.3 2.1 1.6 1.3 2.2 1.8 PROPERTY LINE INDUSTRIAL RAILROAD RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL PHASE LINE RAILROAD 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 2.1 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.3 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.6 1.4 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.3 2.0 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.0 2.3 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.3 3.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 1.8 3.4 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 1.4 2.7 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.9 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.6 1.2 2.1 2.0 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.3 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.1 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.4 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.3 1.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 1.3 2.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.8 2.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.8 3.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.3 3.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.1 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.9 1.7 3.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.6 1.1 2.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.9 0.9 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.4 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SCALE: 1"=30'-0" NORTH PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FILE: C:\Users\12093\Box\HCS\2023\201-300\2023.283 Pinole Shores\E0.1.dwg Mar 18, 2024 - 4:17pm 12093 4512 Feather River Dr #F, Stockton, CA 95219 209-478-8270 | www.hcs-eng.com Richard C. Smith, PE [email protected] Bhupendra Patel, PE [email protected] Elizabeth Aguilar [email protected] PROJECT # 2023.283

PINOLE SHORES

PINOLE , CALIFORNIA
APN 402-230-015, 016, 017, 018 & 020
FOR: PABLO PARK, LLC E0.1 Statistics Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min DOCK AREA 2.0 fc 3.3 fc 1.3 fc 2.5:1 1.5:1 SIDEWALKS 2.0 fc 5.6 fc 0.4 fc 14.0:1 5.0:1 TRUCK DRIVE / PARKING 1.8 fc 2.9 fc 1.3 fc 2.2:1 1.4:1 AUTO DRIVE / PARKING 2.1 fc 9.0 fc 1.0 fc 9.0:1 2.1:1 Image QTY Manufacturer Catalog Description Number Lamps Lamp Output LLF Input Power S2 3 Lithonia Lighting RSX2 LED P3 40K R2 RSX Area Luminaire Size 2 P3 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R2 Distribution 1 21814 0.9 149.9762 S3 6 Lithonia Lighting RSX2 LED P3 40K R3 RSX Area Fixture Size 2 P3 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R3 Distribution 1 21736 0.9 149.98 S5 2 Lithonia Lighting RSX2 LED P3 40K R5 RSX Area Fixture Size 2 P3 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R5 Distribution 1 22316 0.9 299.96 W4 11 Lithonia Lighting RSX1 LED P3 40K R4 RSX Area Fixture Size 1 P3 Lumen Package 4000K CCT Type R4 Distribution 1 14206 0.9 109.44 Luminaire Locations Label MH S2 30' S3 30' S5 30' W4 30' PHOTOMETRIC STUDY PEDESTRIAN RAMP 7.2 fc 9.4 fc 3.9 fc 2.4:1 1.8:1 LANDSCAPE AREA #1 1.4 fc 3.0 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A LANDSCAPE AREA #2 4.0 fc 7.7 fc 1.8 fc 4.3:1 2.2:1 LANDSCAPE AREA #3 3.0 fc 7.5 fc 1.3 fc 5.8:1 2.3:1 LANDSCAPE AREA #4 2.4 fc 3.3 fc 1.4 fc 2.4:1 1.7:1 LANDSCAPE AREA #5 1.9 fc 9.5 fc 0.0 fc N/A N/A

FILE: C:\Users\12093\Box\HCS\2023\201-300\2023.283 Pinole Shores\E0.2.dwg Mar 18, 2024 - 4:17pm 12093 4512 Feather River Dr #F, Stockton, CA 95219 209-478-8270 | www.hcs-eng.com Richard C. Smith, PE [email protected] Bhupendra Patel, PE [email protected] Elizabeth Aguilar [email protected] PROJECT # 2023.283

PINOLE SHORES

PINOLE , CALIFORNIA
APN 402-230-015, 016, 017, 018 & 020
FOR: PABLO PARK, LLC E0.2 LIGHTING SPEC. SHEETS

FILE: C:\Users\12093\Box\HCS\2023\201-300\2023.283 Pinole Shores\E0.3.dwg Mar 18, 2024 - 4:17pm 12093 4512 Feather River Dr #F, Stockton, CA 95219 209-478-8270 | www.hcs-eng.com Richard C. Smith, PE [email protected] Bhupendra Patel, PE [email protected] Elizabeth Aguilar [email protected] PROJECT # 2023.283

PINOLE SHORES

PINOLE , CALIFORNIA
APN 402-230-015, 016, 017, 018 & 020
FOR: PABLO PARK, LLC E0.3 POLE SPEC. SHEETS

Pinole Shores Project
Transportation Demand
Management Plan
Prepared for:

M-Group and City of Pinole
December 2022
OK22-0492
Exhibit D

Table of Contents

1. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 City of Pinole Requirements .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Location and Setting ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Pedestrian Access and Circulation ................................................................................................................................ 3 Bicycle Access and Circulation ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Transit ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Commute Mode Splits in the Project Area ........................................................................................................................ 7

2. Transportation Demand Management Measures.................................................................. 8 TDM Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Required TDM Elements ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Encouraged TDM Elements ...................................................................................................................................................... 9 TDM Program Effectiveness ..................................................................................................................................................... 9

3. Monitoring and Reporting..................................................................................................... 13 Annual Employee Commute Survey ...................................................................................................................................13 Annual TDM Summary Report ..............................................................................................................................................13 Violations .......................................................................................................................................................................................14 No Expiration of TDM Plan or Programs ..........................................................................................................................14 Appendices
Appendix A: Sample Commute Survey

List of Figures
Figure 1 – Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 – Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network ................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 3 – Existing Transit Facilities ............................................................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables
Table 1: Project Automobile Trip Generation .......................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Worker Commute Mode Split ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Required TDM Measures.............................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 4: Encouraged TDM Measures ........................................................................................................................................ 12

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
1 1. Introduction
The proposed Pinole Shores Project is required to prepare a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan consistent with the City of Pinole’s General Plan Policy CE.6.2. This report provides an overview of the City’s requirements, a description of the proposed project, and existing available transportation modes at the site. This is followed by a description of required and encouraged TDM measures specifically tailored for the project based on the project’s location, available travel modes, and the operating conditions at the project. The report concludes by presenting the monitoring and reporting aspects for the TDM Plan.

City of Pinole Requirements
Policy CE.6.2 of the Pinole General Plan (adopted in 2010) requires implementation of “transportation demand management strategies in conjunction with land uses in order to prevent future traffic congestion in the city,” and outlines six actions:

Action CE.6.2.1: Coordinate with ride-sharing programs to provide up-to-date lists of potential riders and to educate the public on commuting options.

Action CE.6.2.2: Encourage the development of employer-funded vanpool and shuttle bus services to new employment centers.

Action CE.6.2.3: Encourage employer provision of information on alternative modes of transit.

Action CE.6.2.4: Encourage employers to offer flextime arrangements to their employees in order to reduce the percentage of trips made during peak hours.

Action CE.6.2.5: Work with schools to encourage carpooling and a flexible class schedule in order to reduce the percentage of trips made during peak hours.

Action CE.6.2.6: Establish and apply minimum carpool requirements for all nonresidential developments.

Project Description
Figure 1 shows the location of the project, which is located at 830 San Pablo Avenue in the City of Pinole and is currently a 7.4-acre vacant lot. The project would provide approximately 117,940 square feet of space in two buildings (37,480 square feet in Building 1 and 80,460 square feet in Building 2). Although the exact use is not yet determined, it is expected to be warehouse and/or research and development (R&D). The project site is about 700 feet north of San Pablo Avenue.

The project would provide 139 passenger vehicle parking spaces and 9 loading docks (2 loading docks in Building 1 and 7 loading docks in Building 2). Access to the site would be provided through one existing driveway on San Pablo Avenue which is shared with other uses located between the project site and San Pablo Avenue. The driveway is located opposite of Meadow Avenue with all movements allowed at the intersection and stop signs on the minor northbound and southbound approaches.

PPrroojejeccttSSititee
Project Location
Figure 1

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
3 Project Trip Generation
Table 1 summarizes the daily, and AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the project, assuming the highest trip generating use (R&D) expected at the site. The project is estimated to generate about 1,310 daily, 121 AM peak hour, and 116 PM peak hour passenger vehicle trips on a typical weekday.

Table 1: Project Automobile Trip Generation
Land Use Size¹ Daily Trips
Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Research &
Development² 117.9 KSF 1,310 99 22 121 18 98 116
Notes:

1. KSF = 1,000 square feet.

2. ITE Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition land use category 760 (Research and Development Center) in General Urban/ Suburban Setting:

Daily: T = 11.08 * X
AM Peak Hour: T = 1.03 * X (82% in, 18% out)
PM Peak Hour: T = 0.98 * X (16% in, 84% out)
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Project Location and Setting
Pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities in the project vicinity are described below.

Pedestrian Access and Circulation
Walk Score is a measure of the walkability of any address based on distance to amenities within a 5 to 30- minute walk, and other metrics such as block length and intersection density. The project site has a Walk Score of 35/1001, meaning most trips from this location require a car. The project is expected to generate some pedestrian trips given its proximity to San Pablo Avenue. However, the location of the project site behind three existing buildings and the winding nature of the ADA-accessible path around them could discourage walking between the project site and San Pablo Avenue.

Sidewalks are present on both sides of San Pablo Avenue and all other streets near the project site. A marked uncontrolled crosswalk across San Pablo Avenue at the intersection with the site’s access driveway provides pedestrian access across San Pablo Avenue.

Bicycle Access and Circulation
Bike Score measures if an area is good for biking considering the availability of bike infrastructure, terrain, destinations, street connectivity, and number of bike commuters. The project site has a Bike Score of 1 Walkscore.com, 830 San Pablo Avenue, Pinole, CA 94564, October 2022 (https://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml)

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
4 32/1002, meaning that the area is not very bikeable and there exists minimal bike infrastructure in the immediate area.

Figure 2 shows existing and proposed bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project. Existing bicycle facilities include:
• The San Francisco Bay Trail north of the BNSF railroad tracks north of the project site, accessible via Pinole Shores Drive, about 550 feet west of the project site • A Class III bicycle route on Pinole Shores Drive between San Pablo Avenue and the San Francisco Bay Trail
The Three Corridors Specific Plan (City of Pinole, adopted in 2010 and updated in 2019), consistent with the Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (Contra Costa Transportation Authority, 2019) proposes the following near the project site:
• Class II bicycle lanes on San Pablo Avenue
It is expected that most cyclists would use San Pablo Avenue and/or the Bay Trail to access the site.

Transit
Existing transit service in the project area is shown on Figure 3 and described below.

WestCAT is the local bus service provided in western Contra Costa County, including Pinole. The bus service shown on Figure 3 represents the current service, as of Fall 2022, in the study area. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, WestCAT has reduced service, including eliminating lines and reducing service frequencies.

Routes C3 and JL/JR operate along San Pablo Avenue with connections to Contra Costa College, Hercules Transit Center, and the El Cerrito del Norte BART station with combined weekday headways of 15 minutes during the weekday peak commute periods. Prior to the pandemic, WestCAT also operated Route 17 along San Pablo Avenue that connected the project with the Richmond Parkway Transit Center. Prior to the pandemic, all bus routes together operated at combined headways of 10 minutes during the weekday peak commute periods. The nearest existing eastbound and westbound Route C3 and JL/JR bus stops to the project site are on San Pablo Avenue at the far side of the intersection with Meadow Avenue and the access driveway to the site. Neither stop provides any amenities, such as a shelter or bench. 2 Walkscore.com, 830 San Pablo Avenue, Pinole, CA 94564, October 2022 (https://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml)

PPrroojejeccttSSititee Existing — Class I Bicycle Path Existing — Class III Bicycle Route Proposed — Class II Bicycle Lane Project Location
Figure 1
Existing Transit Facilities
Existing — Class I Bicycle Path Existing — Class III Bicycle Route Proposed — Class II Bicycle Lane Existing and Proposed Bicycle Network
Figure 2

Project Site WestCAT Service Transit Stops

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
7 Commute Mode Splits in the Project Area
Table 2 summarizes the commute mode splits for workers in the project census tract. Based on the US Census data, about 78 percent of the workers in the area drive alone and about 11 percent carpool to and from work. About 11 percent of the workers in the project census tract use non-automobile modes to travel to and from work, which is consistent with the level of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and the transit service in the project vicinity described above.

Table 1: Worker Commute Mode Split
Travel Mode Percent Mode Split
Drove Alone 78%
Carpool 11%
Walk 3%
Bike 1%
Transit 6%
Other 1%
Total 100%
Source: Census Transportation Planning Products, U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2012-2016 Five-Year Estimates, Census tract 3591.02, Contra Costa County, California, summarized by Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
8 2. Transportation Demand
Management Measures
The TDM Plan for the Pinole Shores project was developed to meet the specific needs of the project, considering the logistical resources, challenges, and opportunities of the site. The TDM measures provided in this plan identify elements and actions that commit the project to their implementation.

This chapter presents the goals and objectives of the TDM Plan and presents details on the required and encouraged measures for the project.

TDM Goals and Objectives
The primary goal of TDM programs is to reduce the number of drive-alone trips generated by new developments, by shifting a proportion of trips to more sustainable modes, such as walking, biking, transit, or carpooling. This, in turn, helps to alleviate traffic congestion, reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) which results in reduced greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollution, and reduce demand for parking. This TDM Plan is designed to reduce single-occupant vehicle (SOV) trips generated by the project.

Because of the success of many individual TDM measures depends on operating characteristics of the project site such as hours of operations, or other factors, such as where employees live, whether they need to combine the work commute with dropping off or picking up children from school or day care, and many other personal factors, it is difficult to know in advance which non-SOV mode will be most attractive to any specific individual or which TDM measure is most likely to encourage them to try it. The Employee Survey, described in Chapter 3, will solicit feedback on employees’ perceptions of obstacles to using a non-SOV mode and what additional measures would be most effective in achieving the project’s goal.

Roles and Responsibilities
A successful TDM Plan requires a combination of supportive site design elements, programming, and incentives to encourage employees to shift to non-SOV modes for commuting to work. Thus, the TDM strategies included in this plan include both one-time physical infrastructure improvements as well as ongoing operational strategies. Physical improvements are anticipated to have a one-time capital cost with some level of ongoing maintenance for certain measures. Operational strategies provide ongoing incentives and support for the use of non-SOV transportation modes. These TDM measures have monthly or annual costs and will require ongoing management.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
9 Required TDM Elements
Table 3 summarizes the required TDM measures for the project, provides a description of each measure, presents the estimated costs of implementing the measure, and estimates the effectiveness of the measure in reducing the SOV trips generated by the project. The infrastructure improvement measures (measures 1 through 5) will be implemented by the project prior to the occupancy of the project buildings. The other operational measures (measures 6 through 14) will be implemented after the buildings are occupied and will be on-going.

Encouraged TDM Elements
Table 4 summarizes the TDM measures that the project is encouraged to implement. Most of these measures cannot be implemented at this time or may not be effective in reducing SOV trips at this time.

For example, depending on the start and end time of work shifts at the site, providing transit subsidies (measure 19) could attract more employees to utilize the frequent transit options along San Pablo Avenue.

TDM Program Effectiveness
The effectiveness of the measures in Tables 3 and 4 is primarily based on research compiled in Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association [CAPCOA], December 2021). This report is a resource for local agencies to quantify the benefit, in terms of reduced VMT, of implementing various TDM strategies. Although the focus of the CAPCOA research is reductions to VMT, the research used to generate the reductions also indicates vehicle trip reductions are applicable as well. For the purposes of this analysis the reduction in SOV is assumed to equal the VMT reduction.

It is estimated that the required TDM measures presented in Tables 3 and 4 would reduce the SOV trips generated by the project by about 5 to 10 percent.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
10 Table 2: Required TDM Measures
TDM Strategy Description
Costs¹ Effectiveness
Range² One Time Annual

1. Pedestrian Connections
Improve walkability and pedestrian access
between the project site and San Pablo Avenue.

Consider providing a more direct pedestrian path
between the project site and San Pablo Avenue
than the current circuitous pedestrian path
through the existing parking facilities and loading
docks. Another option is aligning the crosswalk
across the project access driveway on San Pablo
Avenue with the sidewalks on both sides of the
driveway.
$$$-$$$$ Low

2. Bus Shelter
Coordinate with the City of Pinole and WestCAT
to explore the feasibility and if found feasible,
install bus shelters and/or other amenities at the
bus stops in both directions on San Pablo
Avenue.
$$-$$$ Low

3. Bicycle Parking – Longterm and Short-termProvide long-term and short-term bicycle storages for commuters who travel by bike. $$ Low

4. Bicycle Repair Fixit
Station
Provide at least one fixit station within the project
site which will provide the tools necessary to
perform basic bicycle repairs and maintenance.
$ Low

5. Showers and Locker
Room
Provide at least one shower per gender and six
lockers per shower for each building. $$ Low

6. Remote Work
Allow employees who do not have to physically
be present at the project site to complete their
tasks to work remotely at least one day per week
$ Medium

7. Carpool/Vanpool Parking Reserve preferred parking spaces for carpools and vanpools. $ Low

8. Carpool Matching Efforts
and Promotions
Encourage employees to sign-up for 511
Rideshare or other similar programs that provide
employees with a computerized list of other
commuters near their employment and
residential ZIP code, along with the closest cross
street, phone number and hours commuters are
available to commute to and from work.

Individuals are then able to select and contact
others with whom they wish to match for a ride.
$ Low

9. Emergency Ride Home
Program
Encourage employees to sign-up for 511 Contra
Costa’s Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH). When
unexpected circumstances arise, the GRH
Program provides a free ride home from work for
employees who choose to commute by not
driving alone. The GRH Program is free for
employees who register for the program, work in
Contra Costa County, and use sustainable forms
of transportation, including walking, biking,
taking transit, or ridesharing.
$ Low

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
11 TDM Strategy Description
Costs¹ Effectiveness
Range² One Time Annual

10. Transportation Kiosk
Provide a transportation information board or
commuter kiosk in the employee lounge and/or
lobby of each project building. The kiosk will
contain transportation information such as transit
schedules, bicycle maps, commuter materials, and
511 ridematching incentives.
$$ $ Low

11. Commute Program Flyer
At the start of employment, provide each
employee with an employee commute flyer. This
flyer will include (but not be limited to)
information about carpool parking, vanpool
program, transit opportunities, ride-matching
services, bicycle routes, and emergency ride
home program.
$ $ Low

12. TDM Project Coordinator
and Employee
Transportation
Coordinators
Designate a TDM coordinator for the project site.

The TDM coordinator(s) will manage and monitor
the employer commute programs and will be
responsible for ensuring that all employees are
aware of their transportation options and would
serve as a point of contact regarding the TDM
program.
$$ Low

13. Promotional programs
(Bike to Work Day, Earth
Day, Transportation
Spare the Air notices, enewsletters, etc.)
Provide promotional events and periodic articles
by the project TDM Coordinator for internal
employee newsletters, with ongoing highlights of
alternative commuters and their successes.
$-$$ Low

14. Participate in the Bay
Area Commuter Benefits
Program
Air District Regulation 14, Rule 1, also known as
the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program,
requires employers with 50 or more full-time
employees to register and offer commuter
benefits to their employees.
$ Low
Notes:

1. Approximate cost ranges:
$ <$1,000
$$ $1,000 - $10,000
$$$ $10,000 - $100,000
$$$$ >$100,000

2. Approximate effectiveness in reducing SOV trips*:

Low <3%
Medium 3-8%
High >8%
*Due to inherent uncertainty in the effectiveness of any given TDM strategy, these values represent a reasonable range of effectiveness for strategies placed in each tier.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
12 Table 3: Encouraged TDM Measures
TDM Strategy Description
Costs¹ Effectiveness
Range² One Time Annual

15. Bikeshare/Scooter-share
If bikeshare and/or scooter-share is provided
near the project site, provide annual membership
to employees.
$ $$ Low

16. Rideshare
Designate parking spaces for ridesharing vehicles
and/or designate an adequate passenger loading
zones and waiting areas for ridesharing vehicles.

Provide an app or website to coordinate rides.
$$ $ Low-Medium

17. Carshare If carshare is provided near the project site, provide annual membership to employees. $ $$ Low

18. Pre-Tax Transit Payroll
Deduction Option
Use programs such as WageWorks to help
employees pay for commuting expenses through
pre-tax payroll deductions towards transit passes.
$$ Low

19. Transit Subsidies Subsidize or reimburse employees for transit passes.
$-$$$ Low-Medium

20. Cash Allowances and
Rewards (Non-Transit)
Reward incentives for alternative commute
modes. $$ Low

21. Carpool Incentive
Program
Provide incentives for carpool/vanpool
commuters such as gas cards or bridge tolls
reimbursements.
$$ Low

22. Provide vanpool services
to major transit stations
Explore collaborating with other nearby
employers to provide vanpool services to the
Richmond or El Cerrito del Norte BART stations or
other areas where a high number of employees
live.
$$$-$$$$ Low-Medium
Notes:

1. Approximate cost ranges:
$ <$1,000
$$ $1,000 - $10,000
$$$ $10,000 - $100,000
$$$$ >$100,000

2. Approximate effectiveness in reducing SOV trips*:

Low <3%
Medium 3-8%
High >8%
*Due to inherent uncertainty in the effectiveness of any given TDM strategy, these values represent a reasonable range of effectiveness for strategies placed in each tier.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2022.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
13 3. Monitoring and Reporting
It is important to ensure TDM measures are implemented and effective. Therefore, a monitoring program is necessary to measure the performance of the TDM plan based on the project non-SOV mode-use and corresponding automobile trip reductions. An annual commute program evaluation as described in this chapter will allow the project and the City to assess the effectiveness of the unique program designed for the project. The annual monitoring provides an opportunity for the project to assess the success of the TDM Plan and to make adjustments or revisions as needed to achieve the TDM Plan goal.

Annual Employee Commute Survey
The project shall conduct an employee commute survey (See Appendix A for a sample survey) that would last for five continuous weekdays to assess the employee commute mode shares and evaluate and ensure the success of the TDM Plan. The survey can be in-person and/or online and shall be administered to all site employees.

The project will encourage, support, and participate in the promotion and marketing of the annual employee survey. Survey data may be used to focus commuter marketing and the efforts of the TDM Coordinator(s) to maintain the project’s commitment to reduce vehicle trips at the site, as well as modify the implemented TDM measures to increase their effectiveness. The initial annual employee survey shall be conducted within one year of the project occupancy and subsequent surveys shall be conducted at the same time of the year as the initial survey.

Annual TDM Summary Report
The project shall submit an annual TDM summary report to the City of Pinole to document the effectiveness of the TDM Plan in reducing the SOV trips generated by the project and compliance with this TDM Plan. At minimum, the report shall consist of the following:

1. A description of the current TDM measures and services provided at the project, the level of use or participation of each measure (to the extent feasible), and compliance with the required and encouraged measures in the TDM Plan.

2. Results of the annual employee survey that quantify the mode split for site employees, the perception of the TDM Plan by the project employees, and compliance with the TDM Plan’s vehicle trip reduction goal. The survey results should focus on the weekday daytime employees.

3. Findings of the project compliance with the TDM reduction and participation goal. If the report findings show that the TDM reduction and/or participation goals have not been met, the project would work with City staff to identify modifications to the TDM Plan and if there are additional TDM measures the project could reasonably (financially and practically) implement to further improve the site’s TDM reductions and participation.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
14 The Annual TDM Summary Report shall be submitted to the City after the completion of the annual employee commute survey. The reports subsequent to the first report shall include a comparison of the TDM measures and services and their effectiveness, as well as the mode split data, with the previous years.

No Expiration of TDM Plan or Programs
Ongoing implementation of all required TDM measures will continue with no expiration of this plan.

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
15 Appendix A – Sample Commute Survey
NOTE: Questions should be tailored by the project based on specific policies such as work schedules, available commuter benefits, available commute options, etc.

1. What is your home zip code?

2. What are your typical work hours?
a. Start time:
b. End time:

3. Thinking about last week, how did you get
to work on each of the following days? If
you used more than one, please indicate the
way for the longest part of your trip.
a. Monday:
b. Tuesday:
c. Wednesday:
d. Thursday:
e. Friday:
f. Saturday:
g. Sunday:

4. Thinking about last week, how did you leave
work on each of the following days? If you
used more than one, please indicate the way
for the longest part of your trip.
a. Monday:
b. Tuesday:
c. Wednesday:
d. Thursday:
e. Friday:
f. Saturday:
g. Sunday:

5. Thinking about last week, how often did you
leave work in the middle of the day to get
lunch or run errands?
a. Yes, multiple times a day
b. Yes, once a day
c. Yes, a few times a week
d. No, I did not leave the office during
the day

6. When you leave the office in the middle of
the day, how do you typically travel to get
lunch or run errands?
a. Private vehicle
i. Drove my own private
vehicle (Drive alone)
ii. Drove my own private
vehicle (Carpool)
iii. Passenger in a private
vehicle (Carpool)
b. Uber/Lyft/Taxi drop-off
c. AC Transit Bus
d. Bicycle
e. Walked
f. Bikeshare/E-scooter
g. Other: ____________

7. What is most important to you when you
choose how to get to work? (Select up to 3.)
a. Travel time
b. Cost
c. Convenience/flexibility
d. Reliability
e. Comfort/safety
f. Reducing pollution
g. Ability to make stops between
home and work
h. Stress

8. If you typically use a non-drive alone mode
to commute to work, how can we better
support your commute?
a. Company subsidy for transit
b. Company subsidy for vanpool
c. Company subsidy for biking or
walking
d. Lower parking rates for carpooling
e. Preferred parking for carpooling
f. Assistance using transit or biking
g. Assistance with
h. Flexible work schedule
i. Ride home in case of emergency
j. Incentive program (prizes or
contests)
k. Other: _________

Pinole Shores Project TDM Plan
December 2022
16 9. If you normally drive alone to work, what are
your main reasons for doing so?
a. Need a car for work
b. Need a car for personal use during
the work day
c. No reasonable transit option
d. No reasonable walking or biking
option
e. No options for carpooling
f. Need a car for errands or to
transport children
g. Cannot get home in an emergency
h. Cost of taking transit
i. Other: ___________

10. If you usually drive alone to work, which of
the following transportation options (other
than driving alone) would appeal most to
you? (Select up to 3.)
a. Carpooling
b. Vanpooling
c. Transit
i. BART
ii. AC Transit
d. Bicycling
e. Walking
f. Not interested in other
transportation options for
commuting
g. Other: _________

11. If you normally drive alone to work, what
would encourage you to use a non-drive
alone mode to commute to work? (Select up
to 3.)
a. Company subsidy for transit
b. Company subsidy for vanpool
c. Company subsidy for biking or
walking
d. Parking cash-out
e. Lower parking rates for carpooling
f. Preferred parking for carpooling
g. Assistance using transit or biking
h. Assistance finding carpool partners
i. Flexible work schedule
j. Ride home in case of emergency
k. Incentive program (prizes or
contests)
l. Other: _________

12. Do you have other comments about your
transportation options for commuting to
work?

PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT I.1.

DATE: JUNE 10, 2024
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: SANJAY MISHRA, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROPOSED PRELIMINARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) FY2024-2025 THROUGH 2028-2029 FOR CONSISTENCY WITH THE

GENERAL PLAN

RECOMMENDATION
The Public Works Department recommends the Planning Commission review the Proposed Preliminary Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and adopt Resolution 24-03 finding that the projects proposed in the CIP for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024-2025 through 2028-2029 are consistent with the Pinole General Plan.

BACKGROUND
A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a comprehensive planning document used by the City to identify, plan, and fund capital projects and equipment purchases. Capital projects are usually “brick and mortar” improvements, such as street or utility projects, but also include projects that achieve economic development, blight alleviation, housing goals, or further other policy objectives of the City.

Sections 65401 and 65402 of the California Government Code require that a local agency’s CIP be in conformance with the General Plan. General Plan conformity can be best described as CIP projects furthering the achievements of goals, policies, and infrastructure in the General Plan. State law also mandates that this determination of conformance be made by a designated planning agency. For the City of Pinole, the designated planning agency is the Planning Commission. The purpose of this staff report is to present the Public Works CIP projects for FY 2024-2025 through 2028-2029 so that the Planning Commission can make a determination of consistency with Pinole’s General Plan.

The Proposed Revised Capital Improvement Plan lists 39 planned citywide public improvement projects and 5 infrastructure assessments for FY 2024-2025 through 2028-2029. For FY 2024- 25, there are 35 capital projects and 5 infrastructure assessments scheduled. Staff has also prepared an expanded unfunded project list to include projects that have been identified but have not advanced because a funding source has not been identified. Staff has recommended that several focus asset management plans and infrastructure assessments be completed to aid in fully understanding needs and in allocating funding. These efforts will result in identified projects that the City needs to advance into its long-range financial plan. These projects are described in Attachment C.

The projects in the Proposed Preliminary CIP fall into the following asset groups:

• Facilities
• Parks
• Sanitary Sewer
• Stormwater
• Streets & Roads
• Infrastructure Assessments

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Funding is estimated for specific projects or asset plans in the Proposed Preliminary Capital Improvement Plan that support the goals and policies of following elements of the General Plan:
• Community Character
• Growth Management
• Land Use & Economic Development
• Housing
• Circulation
• Community Services and Facilities
• Health and Safety
• Natural Resources and Open Space
• Sustainability
The Proposed Preliminary Capital Improvement Plan includes funding for projects over the next five (5) fiscal years that support General Plan policies and enhance public infrastructure, amenities, and services in Pinole. The Capital Improvement Plan will also involve actively seeking out grants funds to supplement local funding sources to complete projects.

The Capital Improvement Plan is consistent with and helps implement various General Plan goals and policies which are identified on individual project description sheets for each project in Attachment C and summarized in Attachment B. Appendix I of the Revised Proposed CIP (Attachment C) describes the applicable General Plan goals and policies in detail.

The Capital Improvement Plan’s General Plan consistency review is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as this review is not considered a project pursuant to the definition of a project in Section 15378 contained in the CEQA Guidelines in that the consistency review will not result in potentially significant physical changes in the environment. Specific projects within the plan will include projectspecific environmental review as part of future review and authorization to proceed.

FISCAL IMPACT

ATTACHMENTS
A. Attachment A. Resolution
B. Attachment B. CIP_ConsistencyMatrix

C. Attachment C. Revised Proposed FY 2024-45 through 2028-29 CIP 6-4-24

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 24-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PINOLE

RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE FIND THAT THE

REVISED PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024-2025 THROUGH 2028-2029

IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY OF PINOLE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes designated funding for planned public improvement projects so that the City may continue to maintain public infrastructure, enhance public facilities, work towards satisfying community needs, and help fulfill existing General Plan goals; and
WHEREAS, each year the Planning Commission of the City of Pinole reviews capital projects that will be planned, initiated, or constructed during the ensuing fiscal year for conformity with the General Plan as required by State Planning and Zoning Law (Government Code Section 65401); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Revised Proposed CIP, which includes capital projects to be planned, initiated, or constructed during the 2024-2025 fiscal year for conformity with the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Revised Proposed CIP and determined that the projects specifically support the goals and policies of the following General Plan Elements: Community Character, Growth Management, Land Use & Economic Development, Housing Element, Circulation, Community Services and Facilities, Health and Safety, Natural Resources and Open Space, and Sustainability; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission’s action to determine whether a proposed new or modified CIP project is in conformance with the General Plan, is not subject to the CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 in that General Plan conformance findings required by State law is not a project as defined under CEQA; and additionally, since this is consistency finding, the previous environmental documentation for the General Plan is adequate CEQA documentation; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary Proposed CIP for Fiscal Years 2024-2025 through 2028-2029 for consistency with the General Plan at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to the projects; and
WHEREAS, at the June 10, 2024, Planning Commission meeting, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission considered all the facts relating to the consistency of the Proposed Preliminary CIP for Fiscal Years 2024-2025 through 2028-2029 with the General Plan.

ATTACHMENT A

2 of 2
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Pinole hereby determines that those projects in the Proposed Revised CIP for Fiscal Years 2024-2025 through 2028-2029 conform to and are consistent with the City of Pinole General Plan.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pinole on this 10 th
day of June 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Rafael Menis, Chair, 2024

ATTEST:
_____________________________________
David Hanham, Planning Manager

ATTACHMENT B
City of Pinole
FY 2024-25 – FY 2028-29 Capital Improvement Plan
General Plan Consistency Matrix

CITY OF PINOLE

GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY MATRIX

PROPOSED PRELIMINARY
FY 2024-2025 – FY 2028-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Project number acronyms are as follows: The General Plan Element acronyms are as follows:

FA
PA
SS
SW
RO
IA
= Facilities
= Parks
= Sanitary Sewer
= Stormwater
= Streets & Roads
= Infrastructure Assessments
CC
GM
LU
H
CS
HS
OS
SE
= Circulation Element
= Growth Management
= Land Use and Economic Development
= Housing Element
= Community Services and Facilities
= Health and Safety
= Natural Resources and Open Space Element
= Sustainability Element
Represents projects scheduled in future years (FY 2025/26- FY 2028/29)
Appendix I of the Revised Proposed CIP
(Attachment C) describes the applicable General
Plan goals and policies.

Project # Project Name General Plan
Goals / Policies

FACILITIES
FA2401 TINY TOTS FLOORING AND PAINTING Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1; Goal CS.3, Policy CS.3.1 FA2302 Plum St. Parking Lot Improvements Policy CS.2.6
FA2301 Public Safety Building Modernization Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy SE.1.3 FA2202 Senior Center Modernization Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy SE.1.3 FA1901 Senior Center Auxiliary Parking Lot (formerly known as Fowler House lot reuse) Goal CE.5, Goal CS.1, Policy GM.4.1 FA1703 City Hall Modernization (formerly known as Paint City Hall) Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy SE.1.3 FA1702 Citywide Roof repairs and replacement Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.1, Goal CS.9, Policy CS.9.1

ATTACHMENT B
City of Pinole
FY 2024-25 – FY 2028-29 Capital Improvement Plan
General Plan Consistency Matrix
Project # Project Name General Plan
Goals / Policies
PARKS
PA2402 MURAL PRESERVATION Goal CC.1, Policy CC.1.3; Goal CC.5, Policy CC.5.1 PA2401 FERNANDEZ PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy CS.1.3; Goal CS.3,
Policy CS.3.1; Goal CS.9, Policy CS.9.1, Goal SE.4,
Policy SE.4.2
PA2202 Skatepark Rehabilitation Goal CS.2, Goal CS.3, Policy CS 2.6 & 3.1, Policy GM.4.1 PA1901 Pinole Valley Soccer Field Rehabilitation Goal CS.1, Goal CS.3, Policy CS 3.1, Policy GM.4.1

SANITARY SEWER
SS2407 PRIVATE SEWER LATERAL PROGRAM Goals HS.2, Policy HS.2.5; Goal HS.7, Policy HS.7.6; Goal CC.2, Policy CC.2.2
SS2406 WPCP SOLAR AND BATTERY Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal SE.3, Policy SE.1.3; Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1
SS2405 LOWER TENNENT TRUNK SEWER CAPACITY Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 SS2404 WPCP BOILER REPLACEMENT Goal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 SS2403 WPCP CENTRIFUGE REPLACEMENT Goal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 SS2402 PINON-2 SEWER CAPACITY Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 SS2401 PINON TRUNK SEWER CAPACITY PHASE 2 Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 SS2203 Effluent Outfall Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 SS2201 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 SS2101 Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation Goal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 SS2002 Water Pollution Control Plant Lab Remodel Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.2.6 SS1702 Sewer Pump Stations Rehabilitation Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1

ATTACHMENT B
City of Pinole
FY 2024-25 – FY 2028-29 Capital Improvement Plan
General Plan Consistency Matrix

STORMWATER
SW2401 STORM DRAIN CREEK DISCHARGE

IMPROVEMENTS
Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1; Goals OS.1, Policy OS.1.2;
Goal CC.2, Policy CC.2.2
SW2001 Roble Road Drainage Improvements Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1 Project # Project Name General Plan
Goals / Policies

STREETS AND ROADS
RO2404 CROSSWALK TENNENT AVE AT PRUNE ST
Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.8;
Goal HS.6, Policy HS.6.1; Goal CE.4; Goal CS.2, Policy
CS.2.6
RO2403 OLD TOWN TRAFFIC CALMING
Goal GM.2, Policy GM.3.3, Policy GM.3.7; Goal SE.8,
Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3,
Policy CE.3.2; Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal CE.5; Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2
RO2402 SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Goal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6; Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2; Goal H.3,
Policy H.3.1; Goal GM.3, Policy
GM.3.7; Goal HS.6, Policy HS.6.1
RO2401 ROAD MAINTENANCE REPAIRS Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Policy GM.3.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2; Goal CE.7; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7
RO2303 Pinole Smart Signals Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
RO2302 Safety Improvements on Arterial Roadways Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 RO2301 Road Rehabilitation Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2

ATTACHMENT B
City of Pinole
FY 2024-25 – FY 2028-29 Capital Improvement Plan
General Plan Consistency Matrix
RO2107 Brandt St. Improvements Goal CE.4, Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CS.10
RO2102 Tennent Ave. Rehabilitation Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
RO2101 Arterial Rehabilitation Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 RO1902 Pedestrian Improvements at Tennent near RxR Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
RO1710 San Pablo Avenue Bridge over BNSF Railroad Policy CS.3.3, Goal H.3, Policy H.3.1, Goal CE.3, Goal CE. 7, Policy CE.7.3, Goal CS.10.

RO1708 Pinole Valley Road Improvements Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 Project # Project Name General Plan
Goals/Policies

INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENTS
IN2301 Facilities & Real Estate Master Plan Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.3, Policy CS.2, Policy CS.2.6 IN2103 Recycled Water Feasibility Policy OS.8.1, Policy OS.8.7, Goal SE.9, Policy SE.9.1, Policy SE.9.4
IN2105 Appian Way Complete Streets Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
IN2101 Emergency Power for Critical Facilities Policy GM.4.1, Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.9, Goal HS.4 IN1703 Storm Drainage Master Plan Policy GM.4.1, Policy CS.7.1

CITY OF PINOLE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FY 2024/25 – 2028/29
REVISED PROPOSED JUNE 4, 2024
Attachment C

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FY 2024/25 – 2028/29

CITY COUNCIL
Maureen Toms, Mayor
Cameron N. Sasai, Mayor Pro Tem
Devin T. Murphy, Council Member
Anthony L. Tave, Council Member
Norma Martínez-Rubin, Council Member

INTERIM CITY MANAGER
Neil Gang

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
Sanjay Mishra

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT &

ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM MANAGER
Vacant

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: FY 2024/25 THROUGH FY 2028/29

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction.................................................................................................................................1 Capital Projects Prioritization Matrix ........................................................................................3 Next Steps in Capital Planning ..................................................................................................6 Project Funding...........................................................................................................................6 Funding Sources.........................................................................................................................6 Grants ..........................................................................................................................................7 Overview of Recommended Capital Budget ............................................................................9 Funding Summary ....................................................................................................................10 Project Description Sheets – Facilities ................................................................................12 Project Description Sheets – Parks .....................................................................................19 Project Description Sheets – Sanitary Sewer......................................................................23 Project Description Sheets – Stormwater............................................................................35 Project Description Sheets – Roads....................................................................................37 Project Description Sheets – Infrastructure Assessments...................................................50 Unfunded Project List...............................................................................................................55 Unfunded Project Descriptions ...........................................................................................56 APPENDIX I: Capital Improvement Plan Consistency with General Plan APPENDIX II: Prioritization Matrix Category Scoring Guidelines

Introduction
The Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a multi-year tool used to identify the City’s capital needs and schedule capital improvement projects over the upcoming five-year period. Capital improvements include the design, purchase, construction, maintenance, or improvement of public capital assets (i.e., streets, parks, buildings, etc.).

The projects in the CIP fall into the following broad categories:
• Facility maintenance;
• Parks;
• Sewer collection and treatment;
• Stormwater;
• Streets and roads; and
• Infrastructure assessments.

The FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 CIP contains 35 capital improvement projects and 5 infrastructure assessments that are scheduled to be undertaken over the five-year timeframe and are fully or partially funded. The CIP also includes information for 36 unfunded projects. A funded project is one that has identified specific funding, including on-going existing resources to fully implement the project. A partially funded project has funding to accomplish various phases of the project but lacks sufficient funding to complete the project. An unfunded project is one that has been identified in the CIP as a need but no funding secured to implement the project. Should funding become available through grant or other sources, the unfunded list can be reviewed to determine if it is suitable to seek such funding.

Each project is assigned a project number and described in detail in the project sheets. The nomenclature for the project number is derived as follows:
• Project numbers begin with the abbreviation of the
project category, followed by the year the project was
first programmed, and then a unique sequence
number. For example, FA2001 refers to a facilities
project which was first programmed in 2020 with a
unique sequence number of 01. Unfunded projects
begin with UF and are followed by a unique sequence
number.

The CIP is reviewed and updated annually. In recent years, the City has increased its focus on assessing the state of the City’s infrastructure by inventorying all the assets, assessing their contributions to a safe and vibrant Pinole, assessing their current conditions, and creating a disciplined investment approach resulting in a strong and purpose driven Capital Investment Plan.

The preparation and adoption of the CIP is an important part of Pinole’s financial planning and budgeting process. Proposed projects are reviewed by the Planning Commission for consistency with the General Plan. The project description sheet provides information on the General Plan goal or policy that the project aligns with. Appendix I describes the applicable General Plan goals and policies. The Finance Subcommittee also reviews the CIP and makes recommendations.

Category Abbreviation
Facilities FA
Parks PA
Sewer SS
Stormwater SW
Streets &
Roads
RO
Infrastructure
Assessments
IN
Unfunded UF

The process for developing the CIP involves the following steps:

Development of the FY 2024/25 through FY 2028/29 CIP
Most of the projects in the FY 2024/25 through FY 2028/29 CIP are the continuation of multiyear projects that have already been initiated or are projects that were included in the prior year’s CIP but have not yet been initiated. The FY 2024/25 through FY 2028/29 CIP was developed by taking the adopted FY 2023/24 thru FY 2027/28 CIP, then deleting projects that have been completed or no longer seem necessary and adding new projects. Below is a summary of the changes during FY 2023/24.

Projects added to the CIP by the City Council during FY 2023/24 • PA2402 – Mural Preservation
• RO2404 – Crosswalk Tennent Ave at Prune St
• RO2403 – Old Town Traffic Calming
Projects removed from the CIP by the City Council during FY 2023/24 • PA2201 – Pocket Parks - Galbreth Rd.

Projects removed from the CIP by the Staff during FY 2023/24 • FA1902 – Energy Upgrades
• RO1802 – Hazel Street Gap Closure (Sunnyview)
Projects expected to be complete during FY 2023/24
• PA2301 – Tree Mitigation
• PA2101 – Installation of High-Capacity Trash Bins
• SS2102 – Air Release Valve Replacements
• SW1901 – Hazel Street Storm Drain Improvements
• RO2304 – Safety Improvements at Tennent Ave./Pear & Plum • RO1714 – Safety Improvements at Appian Way & Marlesta Rd. (formerly known as HAWK at Appian Way and Marlesta)
• IN2201 – Energy Conservation, Generation, & Storage Assessment (formerly known as Energy Audit)
• IN2106 – Active Transportation Plan
• IN2102 – Municipal Broadband Feasibility
• IN1704 – Parks Master Plan
Identify projects
for CIP budget
Prioritize projects
and identify
funding
Prepare budget
for CIP
CIP Review by
Finance
Subcommittee
and Planning
Commission
City Council
adoption
Implementation of
approved projects
in CIP

The City’s capital projects have historically been prioritized based on a number of factors, including regulatory compliance, health/safety, grant funding availability, sustainability and conservation, and others. In FY 2022/23, City staff created a more structured, quantitative methodology for prioritizing capital projects. The prioritization matrix is a planning and evaluation tool to optimize available resources. Staff ranks capital projects which have not been initiated based on the following methodology.

CATEGORY SCORE (1-5) CATEGORY
WEIGHT

WEIGHTED
SCORE
Regulatory Compliance 4
Health/Safety 3
Project
Dependency/Bundling
3 Long-Term Planning 2
State of Infrastructure 2
Operating Budget Impact 2
Quality of Life 2
Grant Funding 1
Sustainability and
Conservation
1 TOTAL SCORE (100 Points Maximum)
The methodology scores each potential capital project on nine weighted criteria. This results in a score between 0 and 100 for each project. Staff used this new methodology for the first time in creating the FY 2023/24 through 2027/28 Five-Year CIP.

Staff ranked all projects in the CIP including unfunded projects. The scores are listed on each project sheet and serve as the basis for selecting which capital projects staff initiates based on available resources. Note, this matrix does not consider infrastructure assessments. Project sheets contain the weighted score. Additional information on category scoring guidelines are described in Appendix II. Staff rated the projects in the current CIP that have not yet been initiated. The ranking of these not-yet-initiated projects was used by staff to propose, in the FY 2024/25 through 2028/29 Five-Year CIP, which projects to schedule for FY 2024/25 and which to schedule for later years.

Projects from the adopted FY 2023/24 through 2027/28 Five-Year CIP that have not yet been started and staff recommends for deferral
• IN2301 – Facilities & Real Estate Master Plan
New projects that staff recommended for addition because they are high priority, allocate available funds from Growth Impact Fee, or have a substantial outside funding contribution • FA 2401 – Tiny Tots Flooring and Painting
• PA2401 – Fernandez Park Improvements
• SS-2407 – Private Sewer Lateral Program
• SS-2406 – WPCP Solar and Battery
• SS2405 – Lower Tennent Trunk Sewer Capacity
• SS2404 – WPCP Boiler Replacement
• SS2403 – WPCP Centrifuge Replacement

• SS2402 – Pinon-2 Capacity
• SS2401 – Pinon Trunk Sewer Capacity Phase 2 (Phase 2 of SS2201) • SW2401 – Storm Drain Creek Discharge Improvements
• RO2402 – Sidewalk Rehabilitation Program
• RO2401 – Road Maintenance Repairs
Below are the list of capital improvement projects and infrastructure assessments included in the FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 CIP:

FACILITIES
Project # Project Name
FA2401 Tiny Tots Flooring and Painting
FA2302 Plum St. Parking Lot Improvements
FA2301 Public Safety Building Modernization
FA2202 Senior Center Modernization
FA1901 Senior Center Auxiliary Parking Lot
FA1703 City Hall Modernization
FA1702 Citywide Roof Repairs and Replacement
PARKS
Project # Project Name
PA2402 Mural Preservation
PA2401 Fernandez Park Improvements
PA2202 Skatepark Rehabilitation
PA1901 Pinole Valley Park Soccer Field Rehabilitation

SANITARY SEWER
Project # Project Name
SS2407 Private Sewer Lateral Program
SS2406 WPCP Solar and Battery
SS2405 Lower Tennent Trunk Sewer Capacity
SS2404 WPCP Boiler Replacement
SS2403 WPCP Centrifuge Replacement
SS2402 Pinon-2 Capacity
SS2401 Pinon Trunk Sewer Capacity Phase 2
SS2203 Effluent Outfall
SS2201 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
SS2101 Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation
SS2002 Water Pollution Control Plan Lab Remodel
SS1702 Sewer Pump Station Rehabilitation

STORMWATER
Project # Project Name
SW2401 Storm Drain Creek Discharge Improvements
SW2001 Roble Road Storm Drainage Improvements

STREETS & ROADS
Project # Project Name
RO2404 Crosswalk Tennent Ave at Prune St
RO2403 Old Town Traffic Calming
RO2402 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Program
RO2401 Road Maintenance Repairs
RO2303 Pinole Smart Signals
RO2302 Safety Improvements on Arterial Roadways
RO2301 Road Rehabilitation
RO2107 Brandt St. Improvements
RO2102 Tennent Ave Rehabilitation
RO2101 Arterial Rehabilitation
RO1902 Pedestrian Improvements at Tennent Ave. Near RXR RO1710 San Pablo Avenue Bride Over BNSF Railroad
RO1708 Pinole Valley Road Improvements

INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENTS
Project # Project Name
IN2301 Facilities & Real Estate Master Plan
IN2105 Appian Way Complete Streets
IN2103 Recycled Water Feasibility
IN2101 Emergency Power for Critical Facilities
IN1703 Storm Drain Master Plan
The FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 CIP contains a list of 36 unfunded projects.

The following projects were added as a result of recommendations from recently completed master planning and infrastructure assessment efforts:
• UF032 City Hall Energy Upgrades
• UF033 Public Safety Building Energy Upgrades
• UF034 WPCP Energy Upgrades
• UF035 Youth Center Upgrades
• UF036 Park Energy Upgrades
The following projects were added as a result of Council requests:
• UF031 – Old Town Traffic Calming (This project is within the limits of UF023 - San Pablo Avenue Complete Streets project and may partially or completely replace it.) The following projects were removed from the list of unfunded projects:
• Fernandez Park Improvements (funded in this CIP)
• Pinon-1 (funded in this CIP)
• Pinon-2 (funded in this CIP)
• Tennent-1 (funded in this CIP)
• Faria House Improvements

Next Steps in City Capital Planning
The City is in the process of completing a condition assessment of all of the City’s capital assets to identify the funding levels required to maintain these assets. The City will continue to integrate capital planning information into the Long-Term Financial Plan, so City decision makers are aware of the City’s capital needs when they consider allocation of the City’s limited financial resources and consider possibly pursuing additional sources of City revenue.

Project Funding
A variety of funding sources support projects listed in the CIP. The first year’s program in the CIP is adopted by the City Council as the Capital Budget, as a counterpart to the annual Operating Budget. The fiscal resources are appropriated only in the first year, the subsequent four years of the CIP are important for long term planning and subject to further review and modification.

The CIP is funded primarily with funds restricted for specific purposes. The next section describes various funding sources and their restrictions. Some projects are entirely or partially funded by grants and reimbursements from state and federal government and other agencies.

Funding Sources
Fund # Fund Name
(restriction)
Description
100 General Fund
(unrestricted)
The General Fund is the main operating fund for the City.

It accounts for sources and uses of resources that
(primarily) are discretionary to the City Council in the provision of activities, programs and services deemed
necessary and desirable by the community.
106 Measure S 2014
(unrestricted)
Accounts for 2014 voter-approved half-cent Local Use Tax which levies 0.5% each on all merchandise. Although these are unrestricted General Fund revenues, the 2014 Use
Taxes have been allocated by the City Council to fund
Infrastructure Projects as their highest funding priority. 200
Gas Tax - RMRA
(roads and right-ofway)
Accounts for the Highway Users Tax (HUTA) State imposed excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel sales within the City limits. Gas Tax funds are restricted for use in the construction, improvement and maintenance of public
streets. The taxes are allocated to Pinole through the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA)
established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017.
214 Solid Waste
Accounts for special revenue received from Republic
Services from a surcharge assessed on customer rates for solid waste services. These funds are set aside for future solid waste capital and for a rate stabilization fund.
276
Growth Impact Fees
(nexus identified
needs)
Accounts for development fees collected to mitigate the impact of new development. Provides funds for nexus
identified needs only.

325
City Street
Improvements
(roads only)
Accounts for funds set aside by the City of Pinole to fund street improvement projects. The Measure S 2014 funding plan allocates $250k annually to this fund.
500 Sewer Enterprise
(sewer only)
Accounts for fees charged to residents and businesses for sewer utilities. Fees are used to operate the PinoleHercules Water Pollution Control Plant which services the Pinole and Hercules areas.

Grants
Certain projects are eligible to receive grant funds from state, federal, or other agencies. City staff actively pursues outside funding sources to support projects that are programmed in the CIP. Grants differ based on scope of work, funding source, requirements, and timelines. A grant’s scope is determined by the policy goals of the grantor, and the grantee is obligated to provide deliverables based on the terms and conditions set forth in the grant funding agreement.

Before responding to a grant opportunity, staff reviews the grant solicitation to evaluate the:
• eligibility requirements to ensure the City can apply for funds; • alignment of scope with the City’s adopted CIP;
• feasibility of undertaking the responsibility of grant deliverables; • short term revenue vs. long term costs of the opportunity to ensure that the grant revenue does not result into a fiscal burden of unprecedented permanent or long term expenditures such as the need to hire additional staff, ongoing operations and maintenance;
• required resources vs. available resources such as staff support and grant match; • indirect costs related to administration of the grant such as legal fees; and • cost benefit analysis to confirm that the grant is in the City’s best interests.

Once a viable grant opportunity is identified, staff follows the grantors’ determined application process to develop application materials and submit the grant. After notification of grant award, staff is responsible for grant implementation which includes project execution, oversight, reporting/reimbursement requests, record keeping, and project closeout. Effective management of the grant funds limits the City’s exposure to grant-related legal liability and improves the efficiency and impacts of projects which are funded through grants.

Road projects listed in the CIP receive grant funding from a variety of sources such as:
 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
o Highway Bridge Program (HBP) – funds to improve bridge structural safety.  Project: RO1710
o Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) – funds projects that significantly reduce fatalities and injuries on all public roads.
• Project: RO2302

 West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC) o Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP) – funds projects that provide congestion relief and mitigate traffic impacts on regional routes through capacity improvements on those routes, improved transit services for subregional and regional travel, and improved facilities that allow West County residents to more efficiently access regional routes and transit service.  Projects: IN2105, RO1902, and RO1710
 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)
o One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) – policy framework for MTC’s distribution of federal State Transportation Program and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program funds. The OBAG program provides funding for local street and road maintenance, streetscape enhancements, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, Safe Route to School projects, Priority Conservation Areas, and Transportation planning.
 Projects: RO2303 (County funding), RO1902
o Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 – funds construction and/or engineering of bicycle or pedestrian capital or quick build projects, maintenance of Class I or Class IV separated bikeways, bicycle and/or pedestrian safety education projects, development of a comprehensive bicycle or pedestrian facilities plans, and restriping Class II bicycle lanes and buffered bicycle lanes. • Project: None
 Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) program
TLC program to finance pedestrian, bicycle and streetscape improvements near public transit in cities around the Bay Area. The purpose of TLC is to support community-based transportation projects that bring new vibrancy to downtown areas, commercial cores, neighborhoods and transit corridors, making them places where people want to live, work and visit. Pedestrian- and transit-friendly developments are hallmarks of the program.
 Project: RO1710

CITY OF PINOLE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: FY 2024/25 THROUGH FY 2028/29

FUNDING SUMMARY
SOURCES BY FUND FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total 100 - General Fund $ 90,000 $ 340,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 430,000 105 - Measure S 2006 $ 1,410,000 $ 820,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 3,280,000 106 - Measure S 2014 $ 2,500,262 $ 1,570,000 $ 195,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 4,505,262 200 - Gas Tax $ 1,195,000 $ 381,082 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,576,082 215 - Grant: TLC $ 133,579 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 133,579 215 - Grant: HSIP $ 239,040 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 239,040 215 - Grant: OBAG $ 464,000 $ 556,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,020,000 276 - Growth Impact Fees $ 1,680,000 $ 530,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 2,610,000 325 - City Street Improvements $ 770,000 $ 1,051,507 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,821,507 325 - Grant: TDA Article 3 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 325 - Grant: STMP Fees $ 1,650,189 $ 99,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,749,189 325 - Grant: HBP $ 41,394 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,394 377 - Arterial Streets Rehabilitation $ 895,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 895,000 500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund $ 8,340,000 $ 3,847,411 $ 7,445,000 $ 4,995,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 27,462,411 Sources Total $ 19,488,464 $ 9,115,000 $ 8,390,000 $ 5,465,000 $ 3,305,000 $ 45,763,464 Unfunded Total $ - $ 29,315,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 29,315,000 Total Sources Required $ 19,408,464 $ 38,510,000 $ 8,390,000 $ 5,465,000 $ 3,305,000 $ 75,078,464

FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total $ 90,000 $ 340,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 430,000
$ 1,410,000 $ 820,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 3,280,000 $ 2,500,262 $ 1,570,000 $ 195,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 4,505,262 $ 1,195,000 $ 381,082 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,576,082
$ 133,579 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 133,579
$ 239,040 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 239,040
$ 464,000 $ 556,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,020,000
$ 1,680,000 $ 530,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 2,610,000
$ 770,000 $ 1,051,507 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,821,507
$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ 1,650,189 $ 99,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,749,189
$ 41,394 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 41,394
$ 895,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 895,000
$ 8,340,000 $ 3,847,411 $ 7,445,000 $ 4,995,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 27,462,411 $ 19,408,464 $ 9,195,000 $ 8,390,000 $ 5,465,000 $ 3,305,000 $ 45,763,464 $ - $ 29,315,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 29,315,000
$ 19,408,464 $ 38,510,000 $ 8,390,000 $ 5,465,000 $ 3,305,000 $ 75,078,464

FACILITIES
PRJ # PROJECT FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total FA2401 Tiny Tots Flooring and Painting $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 FA2302 Plum St. Parking Lot Improvements $ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000 FA2301 Public Safety Building Modernization $ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 FA2202 Senior Center Modernization $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 FA1901 Senior Center Auxiliary Parking Lot $ 1,060,000 $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,530,000 FA1703 City Hall Modernization $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 FA1702 Citywide Roof Repairs and Replacement $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 PARKS
PRJ # PROJECT FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total PA2402 Mural Preservation $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 PA2401 Fernandez Park Improvements $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 PA2202 Skatepark Rehabilitation $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 PA1901 Pinole Valley Park Soccer Field Rehabilitation $ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000

SANITARY SEWER
PRJ # PROJECT FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total SS2407 Private Sewer Lateral Program $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 SS2406 * WPCP Solar and Battery $ - $ - $ 175,000 $ - $ - $ 175,000 SS2405 Lower Tennent Trunk Sewer Capacity $ - $ - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ - $ 4,050,000 SS2404 * WPCP Boiler Replacement $ - $ - $ 660,000 $ - $ - $ 660,000 SS2403 * WPCP Centrifuge Replacement $ - $ - $ - $ 990,000 $ - $ 990,000 SS2402 Pinon-2 Sewer Capacity $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000 SS2401 Pinon Trunk Sewer Capacity Phase 2 $ 6,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000 SS2203 * Effluent Outfall $ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000 SS2201 Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation $ 1,185,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,185,000 SS2101 * Secondary Clarifier Rehabilitation $ 425,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000 SS2002 * Water Pollution Control Plan Lab Remodel $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 SS1702 Sewer Pump Station Rehabilitation $ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000

STORMWATER
PRJ # PROJECT FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total SW2401 Storm Drain Creek Discharge Improvements $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 600,000 SW2001 Roble Road Storm Drainage Improvements $ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000

STREETS & ROADS
PRJ # PROJECT FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total RO2404 Crosswalk Tennent Ave at Prune St $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 RO2403 Old Town Traffic Calming $ 20,000 $ 550,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 570,000 RO2402 Sidewalk Rehabilitation Program $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 RO2401 Road Maintenance Repairs $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ 1,750,000 RO2303 Pinole Smart Signals $ 154,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 154,302 RO2302 Safety Improvements on Arterial Roadways $ 275,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 RO2301 Road Rehabilitation $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 RO2107 Brandt St. Improvements $ - $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000 RO2102 Tennent Ave Rehabilitation $ 20,000 $ 735,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 755,000 RO2101 Arterial Rehabilitation $ 1,990,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000 RO1902 Pedestrian Improvements at Tennent Ave. Near RXR $ 515,000 $ 905,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,420,000 RO1710 San Pablo Avenue Bride Over BNSF Railroad $ 1,974,162 $ 28,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,774,162 RO1708 Pinole Valley Road Improvements $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000

INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENTS
PRJ # ASSESSMENT FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 5-Year Total IN2301 Facilities & Real Estate Master Plan $ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 IN2105 Appian Way Complete Streets $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 IN2103 Recycled Water Feasibility $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 IN2101 Emergency Power for Critical Facilities $ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 IN1703 Storm Drain Master Plan $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Uses by Project Total $19,408,464 $38,510,000 $8,390,000 $5,465,000 $3,305,000 $75,078,464 LEGEND:
• Project numbers: FA = Facilities; PA = Parks; SS = Sanitary Sewer; SW = Storm Water; RO = Streets & Roads; IN = Infrastructure Assessments * Project cost to be split 50% with the City of Hercules Total Sources Required
325 - Grant: HBP
377 - Arterial Streets Rehabilitation
500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Sources Total
Unfunded Total
215 - Grant: OBAG
276 - Growth Impact Fees
325 - City Street Improvements
325 - Grant: TDA Article 3
325 - Grant: STMP Fees
106 - Measure S 2014
200 - Gas Tax
215 - Grant: TLC
215 - Grant: HSIP
105 - Measure S 2006

CITY OF PINOLE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: FY 2024-25 THROUGH FY 2028-29

FUNDING SUMMARY

SOURCES BY FUND
100 - General Fund

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHEETS
11

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  42
Budget
New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required
X Rehabilitation
$                     ‐ 50,000.00 $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 50,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                          50,000 $                          50,000 $                           ‐ 50,000 $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 50,000 $                          $                          50,000 $                          50,000 $                           ‐ 50,000 $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 50,000 $ Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area :  Facilities
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1; Goal CS.3, Policy CS.3.1Estimated Expenditures to‐date $                          ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Pinole Tiny Tots interior and exterior facility maintenance including flooring and painting. Replacement of existing carpeted areas in the main room with new carpet or carpet tiles and replacement of existing vinyl linoleum with a waterproof plank vinyl in the snack area and craft/play areas. Exterior siding, eaves, and trim repairs and painting. Interior office, main room, kitchen, and restrooms painting.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The current carpeting and vinyl linoleum flooring are in need of replacement. The carpeted areas are worn and also contain many raised areas that create a tripping hazard. The current exterior and interior paint is from approximately 20 years ago and shows discoloration, fading, chipping, and weathering.

General Plan Goals/Policies
FA2401 ‐ TINY TOTS FLOORING AND PAINTING
Staff Recommendation
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 ‐ Measure S 2014
TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
12

Project Origin : Priority Score : 12
Budget
New Expansion
Replacement X Renovation
Land/Row Acq. Required
Rehabilitation
$ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 7,950 $ 7,950
$ 65,500 $ 65,500
$ 6,550 $ 6,550
$ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000
$ 80,000 $ 80,000
$ - $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 80,000
FA2302 - PLUM ST. PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS
Project Start 7/1/2024
General Plan Goals/Policies
Projected Budget
Goal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6; Goal CE.5
Summary of Capital Cost
To provide a secure parking area for Police vehicles in the Plum St. parking lot. The parking lot will remain open for the public. A portion of the parking lot, approximately 25 spaces will be secured with a chain-link fence with security gates for Police vehicles. The layout of the parking lot is in the preliminary design phase.

Functional Area : Facilities
Estimated
Expenditures
to-date
$ -
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Description
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Estimated Completion
276 - Growth Impact Fees

TOTAL USES
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
USE(S)
Planning
Design
Construction
Contingency

SOURCE(S)

Project Origin : Priority Score : 34
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 350,000 300,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ 270,000 $ 270,000 $ 540,000
$ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 60,000
$ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000
$ 85,000 $ 350,000 $ 435,000
$ 215,000 $ 215,000$ 300,000 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 650,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Facilities
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy SE.1.3 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
To extend the useful life of the Public Safety building, there are several items that require attention including but not limited to replacement of the HVAC system, carpet, flooring, water heaters, light fixtures, fans, etc. In addition, the building requires painting (interior and exterior), and the locker rooms also require renovation.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
FA2301 - PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING MODERNIZATION
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014276 - Growth Impact Fees
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
14

Project Origin : Priority Score : 37
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 100,000 250,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 357,896 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 230,000 $ 90,000 $ 320,000
$ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 30,000
$ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000$ 105,000 $ 100,000 $ 205,000$ 145,000 $ 145,000$ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 350,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Facilities
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy CS.2.6, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy SE.1.3 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 7,895.96
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The project includes a facilities condition assessment and design and construction of improvements to modernize the existing Senior Center building located at 2525 Charles Avenue. Work will include upgrades to energy system, and interior renovations.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
FA2202 - SENIOR CENTER MODERNIZATION
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014276 - Growth Impact Fees

TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
15

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New X ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 470,000 1,060,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,656,655 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 870,000 $ 430,000 $ 1,300,000
$ 90,000 $ 40,000 $ 130,000
$ 1,060,000 $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,530,000$ 1,060,000 $ 470,000 $ 1,530,000$ 1,060,000 $ 470,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,530,000 Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)105 - Measure S 2006 FA1901 - SENIOR CENTER AUXILIARY PARKING LOT
Fowler Lot Re-Use Committee
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Description
On February 2, 2021 City Council adopted Resolution 2021-07 and awarded a contract to a consultant for the preliminary engineering and design for the parking lot. The parking lot will be designed to be a multi-benefit project that includes pavement structural section, striping, lighting, bicycle parking, electric vehicle charging stations, stormwater capture and retention, and drought tolerant landscaping. The final design will offer the maximum number of parking spaces while allowing access for both vehicles and pedestrians and include aesthetic design components. On June 7, 2022, City Council directed staff to incorporate the installation of a solar canopy and backup battery system at the site.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
On April 16, 1990 City Council adopted Resolution 2380 authorizing the purchase of 2548 Charles Street. At the time of purchase, City Council determined that construction of a Senior Center was necessary, and that this property was needed to provide sufficient parking for the Center. The parcel is surrounded by municipal parking lots which serve the Senior Center and Old Town Pinole. The Fowler House tenants remained in the properly till 2010 and many discussions took place to determine the best use of the property. It was determined that the house had asbestos and lead paint. On July 17, 2018, City Council adopted Resolution 2018-67 to create the Fowler Lot Re-use Committee to evaluate the reuse and redevelopment of the property. The Committee evaluated uses for the lot and determined the best use of the property is a parking lot. On October 16, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-93 to approve a contract with a construction company to abate and demolish the Fowler house. The property demolition was completed on March 11, 2019. On July 21, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution 2020–68 to accept the final recommendation of the Committee.

General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Facilities
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
USE(S)Goal CE.5, Goal CS.1, Policy GM.4.1Estimated Expenditures to-date $ 126,655.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
16

Project Origin : Priority Score : 35
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 300,000 400,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 80,000 $ - $ 80,000
$ 290,000 $ 270,000 $ 560,000
$ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ 60,000
$ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000$ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000
$ 400,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Facilities
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy CS.2.6, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy SE.1.3 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Interior improvements and exterior painting to extend the life of the City Hall building and improve its functionality for staff and the public. Several items that require attention include but are not limited to the configuration of rooms on the first floor, carpet, flooring, window coverings, light fixtures, and addition of a lactation room. Interior and exterior surfaces require repainting as the paint system has reached the end of its useful life with fading, chipping paint, along with water and mildew damage. Exterior improvements will include replacement of the City seal and addition of a wall-mounted flagpole and multi-color lighting.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Exterior painting is necessary to maintain external protection from the environment.

General Plan Goals/Policies
FA1703 - CITY HALL MODERNIZATION
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact Fees106 - Measure S 2014

TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
17

Project Origin : Priority Score : 43
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ 300,000 600,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 60,000 $ - $ 60,000
$ 490,000 $ 270,000 $ 760,000
$ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 80,000
$ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000$ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 900,000$ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 900,000 Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
FA1702 - CITYWIDE ROOF REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT
End of Life Cycle
USE(S)Planning
Description
Roof repairs and replacement at four (4) City facilities, the Public Safety Building, City Hall, Senior Center, and Water Pollution Control Plant. In October 2022, City staff received quotes for the rehabilitation of the roofs; it was determined that the Public Safety building roof needs immediate replacement.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
In 2015, comprehensive visual roof inspections were completed by a contractor on various City owned facilities. The purpose of the inspection was to identify the extent, if any, of moisture intrusion into the existing roof assemblies, document observed roof system deficiencies, determine the overall condition of the existing roof systems and to estimate the service life of the inplace roof assemblies.

General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Facilities
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Design
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Policy GM.4.1, Goal CS.1, Goal CS.9, Policy CS.9.1Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
18

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 50,000 20,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ 70,000$ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000$ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ 70,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ 20,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 70,000
ConstructionContingency

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact FeesDesignPreservation and enhancment of murals in the City History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CC.1, Policy CC.1.3; Goal CC.5, Policy CC.5.1
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
PA2402 - MURAL PRESERVATION
Functional Area : Parks Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
19

Project Origin : Priority Score : 24
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 400,000 100,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 $
6/30/2026
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 70,000 $ 5,000 $ 75,000$ 30,000 $ 360,000 $ 360,000 $ 750,000 $ 35,000 $ 40,000 $ 75,000
$ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000$ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 900,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ 100,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ - $ - $ 900,000 ConstructionContingency

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact FeesDesignRenovations to the baseball field to decrease water and energy usage and increase accessibility and safety.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CS.1, Policy CS.1.1, Policy CS.1.3; Goal CS.3, Policy CS.3.1; Goal CS.9, Policy CS.9.1, Goal SE.4, Policy SE.4.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
PA2401 - FERNANDEZ PARK IMPROVEMENTS
Functional Area : Parks Staff Recommendation
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
20

Project Origin : Priority Score : 34
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ 150,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000$ - $ 15,000 $ 15,000$ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Parks
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.2, Goal CS.3, Policy CS 2.6 & 3.1, Policy GM.4.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The ramps at the skatepark have settled and need to be replaced.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
PA2202 - SKATEPARK REHABILITATION
Council Request

TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014

TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
21

Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 180,000 $ 180,000
$ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000$ 200,000 $ 200,000$ 200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Parks
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.1, Goal CS.3, Policy CS 3.1, Policy GM.4.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
There are two soccer fields at Pinole Valley Park which are utilized on an annual basis, the Wright Avenue Soccer Field at the southerly end, and Savage Avenue Soccer Field at the northern end. Both fields are heavily used by soccer leagues and the general public. The Savage Avenue Soccer Field requires substantial rehabilitation which includes: upgrading the irrigation system and ongoing turf maintenance. Turf maintenance includes mowing, fertilizing, aeration, overseeding, and topdressing.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
This project has been delayed pending the development of a Park Master Plan (CIP Project# SS2401).

General Plan Goals/Policies
PA1901 - PINOLE VALLEY PARK SOCCER FIELD REHABILITATION Council Request

TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)276 - Growth Impact Fees

TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
22

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
6/30/2029
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 SS2407 - PRIVATE SEWER LATERAL PROGRAM
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer Staff Recommendation
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Description
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Estimated Expenditures To-Date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
DesignRevolving fund to complete private sewer lateral improvements under a reimbursement agreement with residents.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
This program will support the City's sewer collection system and treatment plant regulatory compliance through a reduction in flows from infiltration and inflow (I&I). I&I reduction will reduce treatment costs and may reduce the scope of or need for future capacity improvements.

General Plan Goals/Policies
Goals HS.2, Policy HS.2.5; Goal HS.7, Policy HS.7.6; Goal CC.2, Policy CC.2.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning

TOTAL FUNDS
ConstructionContingency

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
23

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  56
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 175,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 175,000 $ 6/30/2028
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                           10,000 10,000 $
$                         165,000 165,000 $
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 175,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 175,000 $ $                         ‐ 175,000 $                                 175,000 $ $                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 175,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 175,000 $ Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal SE.3, Policy SE.1.3; Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1USE(S)Planning TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
SOURCE(S)500 ‐ Sewer Enterprise FundPlanning and design for renewable solar energy generation and battery storage project at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP). Install three (3) photovoltaic (PV) arrays with a total PV capacity of 496 kW: a carport array (50‐ kW), a ground‐mount PV array in the public park area to the southwest of the WPCP (175‐kW), and a ground‐mount PV array along the northeast perimeter of the WPCP, adjacent to the public pathway that runs along the canal (271‐kW). Install a 575 kWh capacity battery energy storage system (BESS), controls, and a 450‐kW diesel generator.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
In 2024, Tetra Tech prepared an Energy Conservation, Generation, and Storage Assessment study for City facilities which included: 1) evaluation of energy conservation, energy generation, energy storage, and electric vehicle measures and 2) a renewable microgrid analysis to determine the technical and economic feasibility of installing new renewable energy generation systems and battery storage at the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP).  Recommendations included addition of photovoltaic (PV) panel arrays at three different locations, a battery energy storage system (BESS) and generator. Construction would be completed outside of the 5‐year budget window.

General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Start 7/1/2026 Estimated Completion
Description
SS2406 ‐ WPCP SOLAR AND BATTERY
Master Plan
DesignConstructionContingency
Functional Area :  Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Estimated Expenditures to‐date
24

Project Origin : Priority Score : 59
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000.00 $ - $ 4,050,000 $
6/30/2028
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 170,000 $ 170,000 $ 340,000
$ 3,370,000 $ 3,370,000
$ 340,000 $ 340,000
$ - $ - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ - $ 4,050,000
$ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ 4,050,000
$ - $ - $ 170,000 $ 3,880,000 $ - $ 4,050,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Tennent-1 improvements as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan. This project includes the replacement of approximately 130 feet of 24-inch diameter pipeline, 1,250 feet of 30-inch diameter pipeline, and 10 feet of 36-inch diameter pipeline along Tennent Avenue and inside of the Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) with 1,390 feet of 36-inch to 42-inch diameter pipeline.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master plan identified capacity deficiencies which result in surcharging of the gravity sewer and cause sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's) during modeled peak wet weather flow (PWWF) conditions.

General Plan Goals/Policies

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)
SS2405 - LOWER TENNENT TRUNK SEWER CAPACITY
Master Plan
500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1Estimated Expenditures to-dateProject Start 7/1/2026 Estimated Completion Description
25

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  57
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 660,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 660,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                         600,000 600,000 $
$                           60,000 60,000 $
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 660,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 660,000 $ $                         660,000 660,000 $
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 660,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 660,000 $ Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area :  Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Estimated Expenditures to‐dateProject Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion DesignConstructionContingency
Description
This project includes replacement of the anaerobic digester process boilers at the WPCP.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The anaerobic digestion process at the WPCP includes hot water boilers to heat water for use in the digester sludge heat exchanger. Two 40 HP Natural Gas Scotch Boilers, manufactured by Hurst Boiler & Welding Co., Inc. were installed in 2006 during the Anaerobic Digester Improvements project.

General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2404 ‐ WPCP BOILER REPLACEMENT
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)500 ‐ Sewer Enterprise FundGoal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
26

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  57
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 990,000.00 $                   ‐ $                                 990,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                         900,000 900,000 $
$                           90,000 90,000 $
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 990,000 $                         ‐ $                                 990,000 $ $                         990,000 990,000 $
$                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 990,000 $                         ‐ $                                 990,000 $ Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area :  Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1Estimated Expenditures to‐dateProject Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion Description
This project includes replacement of a dewatering centrifuge at the WPCP.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The solids handling process at the WPCP includes solids dewatering using centrifuges.  One of two centrifuges at the WPCP was originally installed in 2006 and reused and relocated to the Solids Handling Building during the plant upgrades completed in 2019. The centrifuge is an Alfa Laval, Aldec G2‐95 unit.

General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2403 ‐ WPCP CENTRIFUGE REPLACEMENT
End of Life Cycle
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 ‐ Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
27

Project Origin : Priority Score : 59
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - - $ - $ 125,000.00 $ 2,835,000.00 $ 2,960,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 250,000
$ 2,460,000 $ 2,460,000
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
$ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000
$ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000
$ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 2,835,000 $ 2,960,000
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
General Plan Goals/Policies
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
SS2402 - PINON-2 SEWER CAPACITY
Master Plan

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
500 - Sewer Enterprise FundGoal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)
Description
Pinon-2 improvements as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan. This project includes the replacement of approximately 820 feet of 6-inch to 10-inch diameter pipeline along San Pablo Avenue, 680 feet of 8-inch to 10-inch diameter pipeline along Pinon Avenue, 890 feet of 6-inch to 8-inch diameter pipeline along Appian Way, 290 feet of 6-inch diameter pipeline along Meadow Avenue, and 290 feet of 6-inch diameter pipeline between Meadow Avenue and San Pablo Avenue with 2,970 feet of 10-inch to 15-inch diameter pipelines.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master plan identified capacity deficiencies which result in surcharging of the gravity sewer and cause sanitary sewer overflows (SSO's) during modeled peak wet weather flow (PWWF) conditions. 28

Project Origin : Priority Score : 59
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 6,810,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ 6,170,000 $ 6,170,000
$ 620,000 $ 620,000
$ 6,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000$ 6,810,000 $ - $ 6,810,000$ 6,810,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,810,000 Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise FundGoal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal GM.4, Policy GM.4.1 2 Projected Budget
USE(S)Phase 2 (from Orleans to San Pablo) of the Pinon-1 improvements to the Sanitary Sewer Collection System, as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan.

SS2401 - PINON TRUNK SEWER CAPACITY PHASE 2
Regulatory Requirement
Description
History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Construction of Phase 2 of the work. Phase 1 construction under SS2201.

General Plan Goals/Policies
Estimated Expenditures to-dateProject Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area :
29

Project Origin : Priority Score : 52
Budget
New X ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 1,000,000 150,000.00 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 135,000 $ 135,000
$ 900,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 2,700,000
$ 15,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 315,000
$ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000$ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 3,150,000$ 150,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ - $ - $ 3,150,000 Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund SS2203 - EFFLUENT OUTFALL
Regulatory Requirement
USE(S)Planning
Description
The Effluent Outfall project is intended to reduce pressure in the effluent pipe during extreme storm events. Effluent pumping capacity of the treatment plant is limited by the capacity of the pipe size at the effluent outfall in Rodeo. Increasing the pipe size at the Effluent Outfall Eductor Station will increase the wet weather effluent pumping capacity and increase the lifespan of the effluent pipe by reducing the pressure in the line during storm events. This project requires coordination with Rodeo.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Design
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1; Goal HS.2, Policy HS.2.5; Goal OS.1, Policy OS.1.2Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
30

Project Origin : Priority Score : 57
Budget
New X Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 1,185,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,530,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 60,000 $ 60,000
$ 1,023,900 $ 1,023,900
$ 101,100 $ 101,100
$ 1,185,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,185,000
$ 585,000 $ - $ 585,000$ 600,000 $ 600,000
$ 1,185,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,185,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 345,000.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Phase 1 (Tennent to Orleans) and Phase 2 (Orleans to San Pablo) of the Pinon-1 improvements to the Sanitary Sewer collection system, as identified in the Sanitary Sewer Collection System Master Plan.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
On October 4, 2022, City staff released an RFP for preliminary engineering design services for phase 1 of the Pinon project described in the City’s recently adopted Sanitary Sewer Master Plan.

On January 18, 2023, a one-year contract was executed with West Valley Construction Company, Inc. for the work.

General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2201 - SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION
Regulatory Requirement

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund276 - Growth Impact Fees Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
31

Project Origin : Priority Score : 46
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ - 425,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 315,000 $ 315,000
$ 67,500 $ 67,500$ 42,500 $ 42,500
$ 425,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000$ 425,000 $ 425,000$ 425,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 425,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Construction SC 3, SC 4ContingencyGoal CS.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) has five secondary clarifiers which slow the flow to allow the microorganisms and other solids to settle to the bottom of the clarifier where they can be returned to aeration tanks to continue treating waste.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Secondary Clarifiers 1 and 2 (SC1 and SC 2) were constructed in the early 1970s and are peripheral feed clarifiers. Secondary Clarifiers 3 and 4 (SC 3 and SC 4) were constructed in the early 1980s and are center feed clarifiers. Secondary Clarifier 5 (SC 5) was constructed in early 2000 and is a center feed, flocculator clarifier. In the first quarter of FY 2022-23, a preliminary inspection of the center column of the SC 5 was completed to examine the current condition and determine the scope of work for rehabilitation. In the second quarter of FY 2022-23, it was determined that SC 3 & SC 4 also require rehabilitation. Previously, this project was titled, "Secondary Clarifier - Center Column Rehabilitation" which only focused on the rehabilitation work required for SC 5.

General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2101 - SECONDARY CLARIFIER REHABILITATION
End of Life Cycle

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)DesignConstruction SC 5
32

Project Origin : Priority Score : 49
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 6,000 $ 6,000
$ 85,000 $ 85,000
$ 9,000 $ 9,000
$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.1, Policy CS.2.6 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) is responsible for accrediting environmental testing labs including the Pinole - Hercules WPCP. The 2019 ELAP inspection results indicated the lab apparatus, countertops, and the fume hood are past their useful life and recommended replacement.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
SS2002 - WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN LAB REMODEL
Regulatory Requirement

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
33

Project Origin : Priority Score : 50
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ 2,760,000 100,000.00 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 230,000 $ 370,000 $ 600,000
$ 2,300,000 $ 3,700,000 $ 6,000,000
$ 230,000 $ 370,000 $ 600,000
$ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000$ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ 7,300,000$ 100,000 $ 2,760,000 $ 4,440,000 $ - $ - $ 7,300,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Sanitary Sewer
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.6, Policy CS.6.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The City owns and operates two lift stations to convey flow from low lying areas to high elevations where the flow continues by gravity to the wastewater treatment plant. Both pump stations have reached the end of their useful life and need to be rehabilitated. The two pump stations are located on San Pablo Ave. and Hazel St. In FY 2019/20, this project was renamed to include both pump stations. Previously, this project was titled, “Hazel Street Sewer Pump Rehabilitation.” This project also includes the San Pablo Lift Station Force Main, approximately 640 feet of existing 6-inch will be replaced with 8-inch diameter force main.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The City recently completed a Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. In the first fiscal year of construction, the Hazel Street Lift Station will be replaced, followed by the replacement of the San Pablo Ave. Lift Station. The Hazel Street Lift Station will be replaced in coordination with RO2301.

General Plan Goals/Policies
SS1702 - SEWER PUMP STATION REHABILITATION
End of Life Cycle

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
34

Project Origin :  Priority Score :

Budget
New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required
X Rehabilitation
$                   120,000 120,000.00 $                         120,000 $                         120,000.00 $                   120,000.00 $                   600,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                           20,000 20,000 $                           20,000 $                           20,000 $                           20,000 $                           100,000 $ $                           90,000 90,000 $                           90,000 $                           90,000 $                           90,000 $                           450,000 $ $                           10,000 10,000 $                           10,000 $                           10,000 $                           10,000 $                           50,000 $ $                         120,000 120,000 $                         120,000 $                         120,000 $                         120,000 $                         600,000 $ $                         120,000 120,000 $                         120,000 $                         120,000 $                         120,000 $                         600,000 $ $                         120,000 120,000 $                         120,000 $                         120,000 $                         120,000 $                         600,000 $ General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area :  Stormwater
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Design
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)106 ‐ Measure S 2014
SW2401 ‐ STORM DRAIN CREEK DISCHARGE IMPROVEMENTS
End of Life Cycle
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1; Goals OS.1, Policy OS.1.2; Goal CC.2, Policy CC.2.2Estimated Expenditures to‐date $                          ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Condition assessments have identified a number of storm drain pipelines that are structurally deteriorated and failing where they discharge into Pinole Creek. A systematic rehabilitation or replacement of failing storm drain infrastructure will be prioritized as part of the Storm Drain Master Plan.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
35

Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
New X ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 700,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 135,000 $ 135,000$ 500,000 $ 500,000
$ 65,000 $ 65,000
$ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000$ 700,000 $ 700,000$ 700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Stormwater
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyPolicy GM.4.1, Goal CS.7, Policy CS.7.1 Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The existing system appears to have capacity issues at Roble Ave. and Encina Ave. that warrant review and upgrade. This project will assess the collection system for capacity and hydraulic profile and upgrade the system as necessary.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
SW2001 - ROBLE ROAD STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
36

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  65
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $                           ‐ 50,000 $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 50,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                            5,000 $                            5,000 $                          45,000 $                          45,000 $                           ‐ 50,000 $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 50,000 $                          $                          50,000 $                          50,000 TOTAL FUNDS $                           ‐ 50,000 $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 50,000 $ ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)106 ‐ Measure S 2014DesignHigh visibility crosswalks Tennent Ave at Prune St History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.8; Goal HS.6, Policy HS.6.1; Goal CE.4; Goal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
Description
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Estimated Expenditures To‐Date
$                          ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
RO2404 ‐ CROSSWALK TENNENT AVE AT PRUNE ST
Functional Area :  Streets & Roads Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
37

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  58
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $                                 ‐ ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $ 6/30/2026
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                          20,000 $                          20,000 $                          35,000 $                          35,000 $                        465,000 $                        465,000 $                          50,000 $                          50,000 $                           550,000 20,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 570,000 $ $                           35,000 20,000 $                           $                          55,000 $                        515,000 $                        515,000 TOTAL FUNDS $                           550,000 20,000 $                         ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 ‐ $                                 570,000 $ ConstructionContingency
TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)325 ‐ City Street ImprovementsUnfundedDesignAssess feasibility of and alternatives for, and design and construct traffic calming measures on San Pablo Avenue between John St and Oak Ridge Rd. Consider addition of overhead decorative lighting on San Pablo Ave in the Old Town Area.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal GM.2, Policy GM.3.3, Policy GM.3.7; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal CE.5; Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)Planning
Description
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Estimated Expenditures To‐Date
$                          ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
RO2403 ‐ OLD TOWN TRAFFIC CALMING
Functional Area :  Streets & Roads Council Request
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
38

Project Origin : Priority Score : 49
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement X RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 150,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 135,000 $ 135,000
$ 15,000 $ 15,000
$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000
TOTAL FUNDS $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000

TOTAL USES
ContingencySOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014DesignConstruction Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Goal CE.4, Policy CE.4.5; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7; Goal CE.1, Policy CE.1.4; Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Goal CS.2, Policy CS.2.6; Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2; Goal H.3, Policy H.3.1; Goal GM.3, Policy GM.3.7; Goal HS.6, Policy HS.6.1Estimated Expenditures to-dateProject Start RO2402 - SIDEWALK REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Staff Recommendation
USE(S)Planning
7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
This project involves removing barriers to accessibility for persons using wheelchairsor other personal assistance devices and improving pedestrian accessibility andsafety by reconstructing or upgrading curb ramps at various locations throughout theCity.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
39

Project Origin :  Priority Score :  69
Budget
New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required
X Rehabilitation
$                   350,000 350,000.00 $                         350,000 $                         350,000.00 $                   350,000.00 $                   1,750,000 $ 6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024‐25 FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27 FY 2027‐28 FY 2028‐29 FY 2024 ‐ 2029 $                                ‐
$                         320,000 320,000 $                         320,000 $                         320,000 $                         320,000 $                         1,600,000 $ $                           30,000 30,000 $                           30,000 $                           30,000 $                           30,000 $                           150,000 $ $                         350,000 350,000 $                         350,000 $                         350,000 $                         350,000 $                         1,750,000 $ $                         350,000 350,000 $                         350,000 $                         350,000 $                         350,000 $                         1,750,000 $ $                         350,000 350,000 $                         350,000 $                         350,000 $                         350,000 $                         1,750,000 $ General Plan Goals/Policies
Goal CE.3, Policy CE.3.2; Policy GM.3.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2; Goal CE.7; Goal SE.8, Policy SE.8.7 Project Estimate
FY 2024 ‐ 2029
Functional Area :  Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024‐25
Year 2
FY 2025‐26
Year 3
FY 2026‐27
Year 4
FY 2027‐28
Year 5
FY 2028‐29
Design
TOTAL FUNDS
TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)105 ‐ Measure S 2006
RO2401 ‐ ROAD MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
Staff Recommendation
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Estimated Expenditures to‐date
$                          ‐
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Road repair and rehabilitation at various locations. The primary focus of this project is dig out repairs on major arterials and collectors.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
40

Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 154,302.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 154,302 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 154,302 $ 154,302$ 154,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 154,302$ 154,302 $ 154,302$ 154,302 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 154,302 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingencyGoal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The Smart Signals project will develop, manage, and implement ITS initiatives that improve the safety and efficiency of multimodal mobility, maximize highway and arterial system throughput, and improve operational efficiency, safety, and reduce environmental impact throughout Contra Costa County. Contra Costa Tranportation Authority is the project lead and will coordinate the project throughout the county. Twelve traffic signals have been identified as candidates for the Smart Signals project. These signals are located on Pinole arterial roadways (Appian Way & San Pablo Avenue).

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Deployment of the Smart Signals Project is expected to result in operational and safety improvements for all modes of transportation, such as decrease in travel time and total delay, reduction in number of stops and secondary accidents, reduction of fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, and reduction of response time for emergency vehicles. The initial cost estimate of construction is $1,499,829 of which CCTA will receive $1,345,527 in OBAG funds. The City's match requirement is $154,302.

General Plan Goals/Policies
RO2303 - PINOLE SMART SIGNALS
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL USES

TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
41

Project Origin : Priority Score : 38
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 275,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 265,000 $ 265,000
$ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 275,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000$ 239,040 $ 239,040
$ 35,960 $ 35,960
$ 275,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 275,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
This project will install pedestrian crossing enhancements at three mid-block crossings on arterial roadways. The enhancements include continental markings, median refuge islands, advanced stop bars and Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons. The three mid-block crossings are: San Pablo Ave. & Third Ave.; San Pablo Ave. & Quinan St.; and Pinole Valley Road & Savage Ave.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Funding for improvements was secured through Cycle 11 HSIP grant funds.

General Plan Goals/Policies
RO2302 - SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON ARTERIAL ROADWAYS
Staff Recommendation
PlanningContingency

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
ConstructionDesignSOURCE(S)215 - Grant: HSIP 106 - Measure S 2014 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
42

Project Origin : Priority Score : 34
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 750,000 750,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 65,000 $ 60,000 $ 125,000
$ 620,000 $ 630,000 $ 1,250,000
$ 65,000 $ 60,000 $ 125,000
$ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000$ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 1,500,000 TOTAL FUNDS $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,500,000

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)325 - City Street ImprovementsDesign Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024
RO2301 - ROAD REHABILITATION
Pavement Management Program
USE(S)Planning
Estimated Completion
Description
Based on the most current P-TAP report and field inspections, various segments will be recommended annually for rehabilitation. Recommended treatment include patch paving, slurry seal, cape seal, mill and fill.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
43

Project Origin : Priority Score : 27
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 170,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
$ 120,000 $ 120,000
$ 20,000 $ 20,000
$ - $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000
$ 170,000 $ 170,000
$ - $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 170,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
SOURCE(S)100 - General Fund

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
USE(S)PlanningDesignConstructionContingency
RO2107 - BRANDT ST. IMPROVEMENTS
Council Request
Projected Budget
General Plan Goals/Policies
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024
Summary of Capital Cost
Goal CE.4, Goal CS.10, Policy CS.10.2, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CS.10 Estimated Completion
Description
Provide improvements on Brandt St. including application of pavement treatments based on type and severity of distresses on existing pavement.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
44

Project Origin : Priority Score : 43
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ 735,000 20,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 792,805 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 20,000 $ 80,000 $ 100,000
$ 623,000 $ 623,000
$ 32,000 $ 32,000
$ 20,000 $ 735,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 755,000
$ 381,082 $ 381,082
$ 20,000 $ 87,411 $ 107,411
$ 266,507 $ 266,507
$ 20,000 $ 735,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 755,000
General Plan Goals/Policies
Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Design

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)200 - Gas Tax500 - Sewer Enterprise Fund325 - City Street Improvements RO2102 - TENNENT AVE REHABILITATION
Pavement Management Program
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 37,805.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The construction impacts from the WPCP upgrade project resulted in pavement deterioration. This project will rehabilitate Tennent Ave. from San Pablo Ave. to WPCP. In February 2021, the City selected a consultant to complete the preliminary engineering for this project.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
In preparation of this project, the City retained a consultant to perform internal CCTV on this section of roadway. The inspection was completed in early 2021. Coordinating collection system improvements with street resurfacing projects ensures that sewer improvements are made prior to the resurfacing so that manholes and valve covers may be properly realigned, and repairs and replacements are made in a cost-effective manner. This also avoids cutting and patching recently paved streets. The City of Hercules will reimburse $86,430 for this project. In addition, this project is being coordinated with RO1902 for efficient implementation. 45

Project Origin : Priority Score : 37
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ - 1,990,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 2,048,480 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 1,800,000 $ 1,800,000
$ 180,000 $ 180,000
$ 1,990,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000$ 1,095,000 $ 1,095,000 $ 895,000 $ 895,000
TOTAL FUNDS $ 1,990,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,990,000

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)200 - Gas Tax377 - Arterial Streets RehabilitationDesign Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 58,480.00
Project Start 7/1/2024
RO2101 - ARTERIAL REHABILITATION
Pavement Management Program
USE(S)Planning
Estimated Completion
Description
The project is currently in the design phase and aims to maximize the funding available to complete rehabilitation work beginning at the southern city limit on Pinole Valley Road to the bridge west of Savage Ave. The project will include replacement, modification, or installation of a ADA compliant curb ramps, road rehabilitation, and striping.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Based on the 2019 P-TAP report, various segments were recommended for treatment by StreetSaver®. The recommendations were further validated through a comparative pavement analysis and coring samples to explore additional treatment options which are not discussed in the P-TAP report. This will allow the City to optimize the available funding. The section of roadway selected based on the analysis was Pinole Valley Road from the southern city limits.

Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
46

Project Origin : Priority Score : 50
Budget
X New Expansion
Replacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 905,000 515,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,475,300 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 45,000 $ 45,000
$ 425,000 $ 825,000 $ 1,250,000
$ 45,000 $ 80,000 $ 125,000
$ 515,000 $ 905,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,420,000
$ 51,000 $ 99,000 $ 150,000
$ 464,000 $ 556,000 $ 1,020,000
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
$ 515,000 $ 905,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,420,000
General Plan Goals/Policies
Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Design

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)325 - Grant: STMP Fees215 - Grant: OBAG106 - Measure S 2014 RO1902 - PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AT TENNENT AVE. NEAR RXR Staff Recommendation
USE(S)Planning
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 55,300.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
In 2018, the East Bay Regional Park District completed a trail link to connect Pinole Shores Regional Shoreline to Bayfront Park trail. There remains one very small gap on Tennent Ave. from Bayfront Park to Railroad Ave. Improvements to Tennent Ave. at the Railroad Crossing will facilitate safe movement of bicycles and pedestrians. Since project inception, the scope of work has evolved to include improvements that would maximize parking on Railroad Avenue for park users. In February 2021, the City selected a consultant to complete the preliminary engineering for this project.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
WCCTAC held its STMP Call for Projects in 2018 which committed $100k in funding for preliminary engineering from the 2006 STMP program for this project. City staff also submitted an OBAG 3 application in July 2022 to compete for funding for this project. If awarded, the City will need a match of $345k. 47

Project Origin : Priority Score : 55
Budget
New Expansion
X Replacement Renovation
Land/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation
$ 28,800,000 1,974,162.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 31,884,899 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 133,579 $ 4,150,000 $ 4,283,579
$ 1,840,583 $ 1,840,583 - $ 24,650,000 $ 24,650,000 - $ 1,974,162 $ 28,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,774,162 $ 41,394 $ 41,394
$ 1,499,189 $ 1,499,189
$ 133,579 $ 133,579$ 300,000 $ 300,000
$ 28,800,000 $ 28,800,000
$ 1,974,162 $ 28,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 30,774,162
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ 1,110,737.00
Project Start 7/1/2024Policy CS.3.3, Goal H.3, Policy H.3.1, Goal CE.3, Goal CE. 7, Policy CE.7.3, Goal CS.10.

Estimated Completion
Description
The San Pablo Avenue bridge over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad is an integral part of the area’s transportation network. The age and condition assessment of the bridge supports replacement. The City was approved for initial funding from the Caltrans Highway Bridge Program (HBP). In February 2020, the City awarded a contract to a consultant for preliminary engineering (PE) to advance the project. The PE will be completed in two phases due to funding limitations. Completion of preliminary design is necessary to develop a final cost estimate for the project. Unfunded portions of this project appear in the Unfunded list.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
The total budget identified to complete the PE exceeds the amount of funding Caltrans committed to the project of the State’s share in the current HBP. In October 2022, a draft type selection report was submitted to Caltrans for review. This report is the first step to request additional funding allocations from the Caltrans HBP to complete the PS&E phase and construction phase of the project.

RO1710 - SAN PABLO AVENUE BRIDE OVER BNSF RAILROAD
End of Life Cycle

TOTAL FUNDS
325 - Grant: STMP Fees215 - Grant: TLC106 - Measure S 2014Unfunded

TOTAL USES
Project ManagementPlanning & DesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)325 - Grant: HBP Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
48

Project Origin : Priority Score : 33
Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. Required X Rehabilitation
$ - 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 10,000 $ 10,000$ 80,000 $ 80,000$ 10,000 $ 10,000
$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
ConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)200 - Gas TaxDesignAs part of the high school construction project WCCUSD provided road improvements along the school frontage. Improvements to Pinole Valley Road - from Shea Dr. to Helena Ct. will extend the useful life of the pavement. The existing pavement score is high in this area, so a slurry seal may be the recommended treatment.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
RO1708 - PINOLE VALLEY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Council Request
USE(S)PlanningEstimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Estimate FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Streets & Roads
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
49

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 75,000 $ 75,000
$ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000
$ 75,000 $ 75,000
$ - $ - $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
ConstructionContingency
Estimated Expenditures to-date
$ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
The facilities master plan will serve as a roadmap for achieving identified strategic objectives to improve service delivery and utilization of real estate and facility assets. The masterplan will serve to aid decision-making on capital improvements for a defined list of City owned facilities and provide information on potential major maintenance needs (e.g., repairs vs. replace) as applicable.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
IN2301 - FACILITIES & REAL ESTATE MASTER PLAN
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS
SOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014

TOTAL USES
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningDesign
50

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 100,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ 100,000$ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 100,000 This project will connect with the Contra Costa County’s project to provide continuous sidewalks and bike lanes along Appian Way from San Pablo Dam Rd. in unincorporated El Sobrante. This project will involve coordination with Contra Costa County. The construction phase of this project is unfunded and appears in the Unfunded and Unprogrammed list.

General Plan Goals/Policies
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
Contingency
USE(S)

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)325 - Grant: STMP Fees
IN2105 - APPIAN WAY COMPLETE STREETS
Staff Recommendation
PlanningDesignConstruction
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
Policy CE.1.4, Policy CS.2.6, Policy CS.3.3, Policy H.3.1, Policy GM.3.3, Goal CE.3, Goal CS.10, Policy CS 10.2Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Completion of preliminary engineering and design to provide continuous sidewalks and bike lanes along Appian Way beginning from unincorporated El Sobrante to about 1500 lineal feet north of the City limit within Pinole. In December 2021, City Council approved a Cooperative Funding Agreement with WCCTAC to receive STMP funds to complete preliminary design for this project.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
51

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 60,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 75,152 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 60,000 $ 60,000$ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000$ 60,000 $ 60,000$ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 60,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Policy OS.8.1, Policy OS.8.7, Goal SE.9, Policy SE.9.1, Policy SE.9.4Estimated Expenditures to-date $ 15,152.25
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
A feasibility study will allow the City to plan and phase the construction of future recycled water distribution system infrastructure. The study will identify potential recycled water customers, evaluate the quantity, quality, and recycled water distribution system options to address the needs of potential users in surrounding areas, seek opportunities to phase the construction of a recycled water delivery system, and develop planning-level cost options for the phased system.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
Recycled water delays or eliminates the need to construct more potable water facilities, sustains the economy with increased water supply reliability, protects the environment, safeguards investments in parks and landscaping with drought proof or drought resistant water supply, and contributes to a green and healthy environment. In 2019, East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) prepared an Updated Recycled Waster Plan which considered the potential for potable reuse in EBMUD’s water service area. The development of a new recycled water supply for the Phillips 66 refinery in Rodeo using effluent from the Pinole-Hercules and Rodeo wastewater treatment plants was among the recommended non-potable reuse projects. This project is estimated to deliver up to 3.67 MGD of recycled water to the refinery for use in their boilers and cooling towers. The combined final disinfected effluent from both plants would be pumped at the Rodeo Pump Station to the refinery for treatment a new advanced recycled water treatment plan. This project was recommended by EBMUD because it would deliver a large amount of water to a single customer, with comparatively few pipelines required due to the short distance between the sources of wastewater and the Phillips 66 Refinery General Plan Goals/Policies IN2103 - RECYCLED WATER FEASIBILITY
Council Request

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)100 - General Fund Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
52

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ 170,000 30,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 30,000 $ 30,000
$ 170,000 $ 170,000
$ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000$ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ 200,000$ 30,000 $ 170,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 DesignConstructionContingency

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
SOURCE(S)100 - General Fund
Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
USE(S)PlanningPolicy GM.4.1, Policy CS.2.6, Goal CS.9, Goal HS.4Estimated Expenditures to-date $ - Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
During severe natural hazard events, it is highly likely that utility power will not be available for an extended period of time. Critical facilities will need reliable sources of sustained electrical power to continue operations. This project will: 1) identify critical facilities in need of back-up power in coordination with an Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) , 2) assess power loads in each critical facility that requires back-up power, 3) determine the costs and technology options including solar battery storage, and 4) make any additional recommendations to Council before advancing to construction.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
The Public Safety Building, Fire Station 74, and the Water Pollution Control Plant have stand by generators.

General Plan Goals/Policies
IN2101 - EMERGENCY POWER FOR CRITICAL FACILITIES
Council Request
Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
53

Project Origin : Priority Score :

Budget
New ExpansionReplacement RenovationLand/Row Acq. RequiredRehabilitation $ - 150,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $
6/30/2025
Budget Project Estimate
FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2027-28 FY 2028-29 FY 2024 - 2029 $ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ 150,000$ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 Project Estimate
FY 2024 - 2029
Functional Area : Infrastructure Assessment
Type of CIP Unappropriated Subsequent Years
Year 1
FY 2024-25
Year 2
FY 2025-26
Year 3
FY 2026-27
Year 4
FY 2027-28
Year 5
FY 2028-29
USE(S)Policy GM.4.1, Policy CS.7.1Estimated Expenditures to-date $ 100,000.00
Project Start 7/1/2024 Estimated Completion
Description
Preparation of a storm drain master plan will provide an analysis of the existing collection system. The plan will identify system deficiencies related to capacity, functionality, and permit compliance. The plan can serve to guide future budget allocations for improvements to the system.

History, Status, or Impact if Delayed
General Plan Goals/Policies
IN1703 - STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN
Staff Recommendation

TOTAL FUNDS

TOTAL USES
PlanningDesignConstructionContingencySOURCE(S)106 - Measure S 2014 Summary of Capital Cost
Projected Budget
54

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN: FY 2024/25 THROUGH FY 2028/29

UNFUNDED PROJECTS LIST
# Unfunded Projects
UF001 Railroad Avenue Bridge Removal and Replacement
UF002 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in City Lots
UF003 Parking Lot Resurfacing
UF004 LLAD Landscape Restoration and Improvement
UF005 Dog Park Restroom Replacement
UF006 Dog Park Resurfacing and Fencing Improvements
UF007 Eucalyptus Grove Restoration
UF008 Fernandez Park Baseball Grandstand Improvement
UF009 Repave Trails
UF010 ADA Ramps
UF011 Appian Complete Streets
UF012 Pedestrian Bridge Maintenance (formerly known as Bridge Maintenance) UF013 Pavement Maintenance
UF014 I-80/Pinole Valley Rd. Interchange Improvements
UF015 Shale Hill Retaining Wall and Sidewalk Gap
UF016 Sidewalks Gaps
UF017 Signal System Upgrades
UF018 Tennent-2
UF019 Tree Master Plan
UF020 San Pablo Avenue Bridge over BNSF Railroad
UF021 Installation of Solar at City Facilities
UF022 All Access Weather Roads
UF023 San Pablo Avenue Complete Streets
UF024 Signalized Intersections
UF025 Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections
UF026 Safety at Unsignalized Intersections
UF027 Roadway Segments #1
UF028 Roadway Segments #2
UF029 Roadway Segments #3
UF030 Vehicular Bridge Maintenance
UF031 Old Town Traffic Calming
UF032 City Hall Energy Upgrades
UF033 Public Safety Building Energy Upgrades
UF034 WPCP Energy Upgrades
UF035 Youth Center Upgrades
UF036 Park Energy Upgrades
Legend:

New unfunded projects added
55

UNFUNDED PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
56

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Sanitary Sewer
Stormwater
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 11
Project Information
Council Request
Facilities
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:
43 UF001 - Railroad Avenue Bridge Removal and Replacement The Contra Costa County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District has
advised removal of the Railroad Avenue
Bridge. The bridge is a flood barrier. The
first step is to determine if the City of
Pinole is the responsible agency for this
project.
$ -
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Project Origin:

UF002 - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations in City Lots The City desires to promote and
encourage the use of electric vehicles.

With increased adoption of alternative fuel
vehicles, the need for charging
infrastructure is growing. The City wishes
to install charging stations in city owned
parking lots. The first step is to complete a
load study at City owned parking lots to
determine the electrical capacity at each
site. There may be significant electrical
upgrades necessary to install charging
stations. Electrical capacity and siting
determine ultimately determine the cost of
each project. There are incentives
available for the charging equipment.
$ -
Bay Area Air Quality Management District, West
Contra Costa Transportation Authority, Marin
Clean Energy
Functional Area:

Priority Score:
57

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Facilities
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 32
Project Information
LLAD Report
LLAD
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 27
- LLAD Landscape Restoration and Improvement
The Pinole Valley Road Landscape and
Lighting Assessment District was formed
in 2008. The City installed various
improvements on Pinole Valley Road
between Henry Avenue and Ramona
Street. The district provides maintenance
to traffic signals, streetlights, median
landscaping, irrigation for landscaping,
electricity to traffic signals and streetlights,
and graffiti removal. This project will
maintain and restore turf, shrubs, plants
and trees within the District. In FY
2022/23, this work was completed for
Zone A (between I-80 and Henry Ave.)
Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ -
Fund 345 & 348
UF003 - Parking Lot Resurfacing
UF004
This project is to maintain and enhance
existing City owned parking facilities and
infrastructure, to increase parking supply,
and to support ongoing multi-modal and
streetscape improvements. Improvements
include saw cutting and demolition,
pavement removal, earthwork, pavement
installation, curb and gutter, striping, and
signage.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ -
58

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Parks
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 36
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Parks
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 36
UF006 - Dog Park Resurfacing and Fencing Improvements
Resurfacing and fencing improvements Project Origin:

Functional Area:

The existing restroom located at the Dog
Park is beyond its useful life and requires
replacement.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 200,000
$ 75,000
UF005 - Dog Park Restroom Replacement
59

Project Information
Council Request
Parks
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 22
Project Information
End of Life Cycle
Parks
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 27
$ 150,000
$ 250,000
- Fernandez Park Baseball Grandstand Improvement
The current grandstand is aging and
requires increased maintenance to
maintain its serviceability.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

UF008
UF007 - Eucalyptus Grove Restoration
The open space located between the Old
Town area between John St. and Pinole
Valley Road is forested with Eucalyptus
trees. In 2014, a Safety Inspection was
conducted by a consultant. A total of 8
trees were recommended for removal, and
root crown excavation was recommended
for 3 trees. 2 trees were determined to be
hollow and recommended for further
investigation to evaluate the level of
internal decay. In 2018, the City hired a
company to remove 20 Eucalyptus trees in
the area. There are still many trees left
and many of the prior trees were felled
with the trunks remaining on site. This
Project Origin:

Functional Area:
60

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Parks
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 25
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 49
$ -
$ -
- ADA Ramps
This project involves removing barriers to
accessibility for persons using wheelchairs
or other personal assistance devices and
improving pedestrian accessibility and
safety by reconstructing or upgrading curb
ramps at various locations throughout the
City.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

UF010
- Repave Trails
The City’s goal is to develop safe,
connected, and comfortable bicycle and
pedestrian facilities for people of all ages
and abilities. Repaving trails will enhance
trail access from the City’s roadway
network to encourage alternative modes of
transportation. The Active Transportation
Plan is underway and will identify a trail
network and recommend improvements.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

UF009
61

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 30
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 22
- Pedestrian Bridge Maintenance
Maintenance of pedestrian bridges as
identified in the Pedestrian Bridge
Inspection Reports completed by Quincy
Engineering, Inc. In FY 2023/24 there is
$50,000 budgeted in the operating budget
for maintenance activities.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 224,700
UF012
- Appian Complete Streets
This project will provide continuous
sidewalks and bike lanes along Appian
Way from San Pablo Dam Rd. in
unincorporated El Sobrante to about 1500
lineal feet north of the city limit within the
City of Pinole. The City received STMP
funds from West Contra Costa
Transportation Authority for preliminary
design. The construction phase remains
unfunded.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 970,000
UF011
62

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 25
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 9
- I-80 / Pinole Valley Rd Interchange Improvements
This project will widen Pinole Valley Road
ramp terminal intersections at I-80 to
provide a dedicated right turn lane to the
eastbound and westbound I-80 on ramps.

This project will also provide crossing
enhancements at the Pinole Valley Road
and I-80 intersection.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 10,959,000
UF014
UF013 - Pavement Maintenance
The City uses a pavement management
software known as StreetSaver to
strategize the most cost effective method
to extend the pavement life. Pavement
Maintenance is necessary to maintain the
City’s pavement network. Deferred
maintenance results in increased costs
over time.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Fund 200 and Fund 106
$ 42,000,000
63

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 9
Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 16
UF015 - Shale Hill Retaining Wall and Sidewalk Gap
UF016 - Sidewalk Gaps
Project Origin:
$ -
This project will address sidewalk gaps by
installing public sidewalks where
sidewalks are missing on one or both
sides of the street. This work will be
coordinated with other construction
projects. Sidewalk gaps often exist in
places with site constraints (i.e. right of
way, grade/slopes, or utility conflicts) or
are adjacent to properties that have been
required to provide sidewalks in the past
due to land uses or ownerships. Locations
for repair will be selected based on site
conditions, pedestrian safety, and
adjacent property attributes.

Functional Area:

Shale Hill is located on San Pablo Ave.
near Oak Ridge Road. The cut slope
above the pavement is comprised of shale
which is loose and sloughs onto the road.

There is no sidewalk in this area because
the toe of the embankment is uncontrolled
and there is inadequate space to
accommodate a sidewalk. Staff has not
been successful in securing grant funds
for this project.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ -
64

Project Information
Staff Recommendation
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 16
Project Information
Master Plan
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 59
Signal System Upgrades
This project will upgrade various aspects
of the City’s traffic signal system including:
traffic signal controller equipment, vehicle
detection, traffic signal arms and heads,
battery backup systems, and
communications systems to reduce
congestion and improve safety for the
Pinole community.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 4,239,000
This project involves replacement of the
approximately pipeline along Tennent
Avenue.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

UF018 - Tennent-2 Sewer Capacity Improvements
$ -
UF017 -
65

Project Information
Beautification Adhoc Committee
Infrastructure Assessment
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 11
Project Information
End of Life Cycle
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 58
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Fund 213, Fund 214, Economic Stimulus Funds
$ 28,800,000
This project will replace the existing
thirteen span reinforced concrete span
structure over the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe Railroad adjacent to San Pablo
Avenue at the easterly limits of the City.

On 02/18/20, Council awarded a contract
to a Consultant to begin the preliminary
engineering (PE) for this project (CIP
Project RO1710). The PE will be
completed in two phases due to funding
limitations. The first phase was necessary
to develop a final cost estimate to facilitate
pursuing additional funding required to
complete all phases including
construction.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Cal Fire Urban and Community Forestry Grant
Program
UF020 - San Pablo Avenue Bridge over BNSF Railroad
$ 375,000
UF019 - Tree Master Plan
In 2019, the City Council established a
Beautification Ad Hoc Committee to
analyze options for, and to make
recommendations to Council regarding
clean-up and beautification projects in
Pinole. Among other projects, the
Committee recommended the
development of a Tree Master Plan to
inventory the existing trees, and to
develop a plan for managing the tree
inventory, including finding tree planting
opportunities.
66

Project Information
Council Request
Facilities
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 37
Project Information
General Plan
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 20
Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ -
The General Plan, Chapter 8 discusses
improvement of open space management
to reduce wildfire risks. There is a desire
to have improved, all-weather access
roads through open space to improve
access to and from Hercules and El
Sobrante to shorten response times and
improve mutual aid.

Functional Area:

UF022 - All-Weather Access Roads
$ -
UF021 - Installation of Solar at City Facilities
This project involves procurement and
installation of solar panels at City owned
facilities to offset the City’s electricity
consumption and reduce the greenhouse
gas impacts.

Project Origin:
67

Project Information
Council Request
Infrastructure Assessment
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 15
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 46
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
$ 183,792
Improvement to signal hardware, signal
timing, or protected left turn phases at:
· Appian Way & Fitzgerald Dr
· San Pablo Ave & Tennent Ave
· Appian Way & Canyon Dr/Tara Hills
· Pinole Valley Rd/Tennent Ave/Ellerhorst St
· San Pablo Ave & Pinole Valley Rd
· San Pablo Ave & Pinon Ave/Appian Way
· Pinole Valley Rd & Estates Ave
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program
(STMP) funds
UF024 - Signalized Intersections
$ 200,000
UF023 - San Pablo Avenue Complete Streets
A complete streets plan would create a
new vision for San Pablo Avenue, to
transform it into a place where people of
all ages and abilities can travel safely and
comfortably whether walking, bicycling,
riding transit, or driving . The UF031 - Old
Town Traffic Calming project is within the
limits of this project which may partially or
completely replace it.
68

Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 46
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 46
Install intersection lighting, install/upgrade
larger or additional stop signs or other
intersection warning/regulatory signs, or
install RRFB:
· Walter Ave & San Pablo Ave
· Pinole Valley Rd & Simas Ave
· Pinole Valley Rd & Wright Ave
· Pinole Valley Rd & Rafaela St
· Wright Ave & Carol St
· Simas Ave & Moraga Dr
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
$ 879,830
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
UF026 - Safety at Unsignalized Intersections
$ 514,548
UF025 - Pedestrian Safety at Signalized Intersections
Installation of advance stop bars before
crosswalk, raised median on approaches,
raised pavement markers and striping
through intersection at:
· Appian Way & Fitzgerald Dr
· San Pablo Ave & Tennent Ave
· Appian Way & Canyon Dr/Tara Hills
· Pinole Valley Rd/Tennent Ave/Ellerhorst St
· San Pablo Ave & Pinole Valley Rd
· Fitzgerald Dr and Best Buy Parking Lot
· Pinole Valley Rd & Estates Ave
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.
69

Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 46
Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 46
- Roadway Segments # 2
Install centerline rumble strips/stripes, or
install edge-lines and centerlines, or install
RRFB:
· Pinole Valley Rd: San Pablo Ave to Collins Ave
· San Pablo Ave: Oak Ridge Rd to Pinole Valley Rd
· San Pablo Ave: Golden Gate to Del Monte Dr
· Tara Hills: Kilkenny Way to Appian Way
· Walter Ave: North Terminus to San Pablo Ave
· Tennent Ave: San Pablo Ave to Pinole Valley Rd
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 914,375
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
UF028
- Roadway Segments # 1
Install segment lighting, or install/upgrade
signs with new fluorescent sheeting, or
install delineators, reflectors/object
markers.
· Pinole Valley Rd: San Pablo Ave to Collins Ave
· San Pablo Ave: Oak Ridge Rd to Pinole Valley Rd
· San Pablo Ave: Golden Gate to Del Monte Dr
· Tara Hills: Kilkenny Way to Appian Way
· Walter Ave: North Terminus to San Pablo Ave
· Fitzgerald Dr: Jovita Ln to Appian Way
· Appian Way: San Pablo Ave to Michael Dr
· Tennent Ave: San Pablo Ave to Pinole Valley Rd
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
$ 1,469,474
UF027
70

Project Information
LRSP
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 46
Project Information
Caltrans Bridge Inspection
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 22
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
UF030 - Vehicular Bridge Maintenance
$ 1,483,510
UF029 - Roadway Segments # 3
Implement road diet, or install
dynamic/variable speed warning signs, or
install/upgrade pedestrian crossing:
· Pinole Valley Rd: San Pablo Ave to Collins Ave
· San Pablo Ave: Oak Ridge Rd to Pinole Valley Rd
· Tara Hills: Kilkenny Way to Appian Way
· Fitzgerald Dr: Jovita Ln to Appian Way
· Appian Way: San Pablo Ave to Michael Dr
Refer to the Local Road Safety Plan
(LRSP) document for detailed
recommendations.

Maintenance of vehicular bridges as
identified in the Caltrans Bridge Inspection
Reports. The latest bridge inspection
issued in May 2023, contains
recommendations for three bridges near:
· PVHS High School on Pinole Valley Rd
· Wright Ave on Pinole Valley Rd
· On Simas Ave near Pinole Valley Rd
Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ -
71

Project Information
Council Request
Streets & Roads
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 58
Project Information
Assessment
Facilities
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 57
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.

Assess feasibility of and alternatives for,
and design and construct traffic calming
measures on San Pablo Avenue between
John St and Oak Ridge Rd. This project is
within the limits of UF023 - San Pablo
Avenue Complete Streets project and may
partially or completely replace it.

UF032 - City Hall Energy Upgrades
$ 570,000
UF031
$ 189,000
- Old Town Traffic Calming
72

Project Information
Assessment
Facilities
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 58
Project Information
Assessment
Sanitary Sewer
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 59
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
$ 1,686,000
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.

Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.

UF033 - Public Safety Building Energy Upgrades
UF034 - WPCP Energy Upgrades
$ 160,000
73

Project Information
Assessment
Facilities
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 58
Project Information
Assessment
Parks
Cost Estimate:

Potential Funding Sources:

Priority Score: 62
Project Origin:

Functional Area:

Project Origin:

Functional Area:
$ 30,000
Park Energy Upgrades
$ 17,000
UF035 - Youth Center Energy Upgrades
Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.

Energy conservation measures
recommended in the Energy
Conservation, Generation, and Storage
Assessment.

UF036 -
74

APPENDIX I

APPENDIX I: Capital Improvement Plan Consistency with General Plan Funding is estimated for specific projects or asset plans in the FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) which support the goals and policies of following elements of the General Plan:
• Community Character (CC)
• Growth Management (GM)
• Land Use & Economic Development (LU)
• Housing (H)
• Circulation Element (CE)
• Community Services and Facilities (CS)
• Health and Safety (HS)
• Natural Resources and Open Space (OS)
• Sustainability Element (SE)
The acroynms and associated General Plan goals/policies are listed on individual project sheets.

The FY 2024/25 – 2028/29 CIP includes funding for projects over the next five (5) fiscal years that support General Plan policies and enhance public infrastructure, amenities, and services in Pinole. The CIP is consistent with and helps implement the following General Plan goals and policies:

Community Character Element
GOAL CC.1 Maintain Pinole’s unique qualities and sense of place to preserve the established historic and small-town character of the city.

POLICY CC.1.2 Require all new development to incorporate high-quality site design, architecture and planning to enhance the overall quality of the built environment in Pinole and create a visually interesting and aesthetically pleasing town environment.

POLICY CC.1.3 To enhance a sense of arrival and create a strong appealing image that promotes community identity, the City shall develop community entry features at key gateways or city entries along Interstate 80. Entryways shall incorporate landscaping, trees, structural architectural elements, signage and public art.

POLICY CC.1.5 Encourage project compatibility, interdependence and support with neighboring uses, especially between commercial and mixed-use centers and the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Uses should relate to one another with pedestrian connections, transit options, shared parking, landscaping, public spaces, and the orientation and design of buildings.

GOAL CC.2 Emphasize and enhance the visual and physical connection between the city’s natural environment and the community’s quality of life.

POLICY CC.2.1 Provide visual and physical connections between the natural environment and the built environment through careful site design, building placement, architectural features that allow views of Pinole’s unique environment such as ridgelines or the San Pablo Bay shoreline, public access to open space such as via the Bay Trail, and the use of native vegetation in the urban environment such as for landscape buffers for sidewalk areas and street trees.

POLICY CC.2.2 Preserve natural resources within the built environment, including trees, marshes, creeks and hillsides.

GOAL CC.5 Enhance the quality of life in Pinole by acknowledging the cultural diversity and by promoting, preserving and sustaining the cultural and performing arts.

POLICY CC.5.1 Celebrate the city’s cultural diversity through public art, cultural centers and community events for the benefit and enjoyment of all residents.

POLICY CC.5.2 Develop programs and facilities that promote the cultural and performing arts in Pinole.

Growth Management Element
GOAL GM.1 Regional Planning. Support cooperative transportation, land use and public service planning in Contra Costa County.

POLICY GM.1.1 West Contra Costa County Planning Activities. Achieve efficient public service delivery by coordinating with affected jurisdictions and agencies concerning public and private developments.

GOAL GM.3 Efficient Transportation. Support land use patterns that make efficient use of the transportation system and enhance public safety.

POLICY GM.3.1 Transportation Management. Make more efficient use of the regional and subregional transportation system.

POLICY GM.3.3 Provide Adequate Transportation Facilities and Services. Provide adequate transportation facilities while maintaining neighborhood integrity.

POLICY GM.3.7 Mobility-Impaired. Support efforts to provide safe and convenient transportation systems for all citizens of Pinole, particularly mobility-impaired individuals.

GOAL GM.4 Compact Development and Service Areas. Encourage infill and redevelopment in areas that are already served by utilities, infrastructure and public services.

POLICY GM.4.1 Planning for Present and Future Community Needs. Plan for, provide and maintain a level of public infrastructure facilities and services that adequately serves the present and future needs of the community.

Land Use & Economic Development Element
GOAL LU.1 Preserve and enhance the natural resources, high-quality residential neighborhoods and commercial areas, and small-town (semi-rural) character of Pinole.

POLICY LU.1.3 Establish and implement a continuing program of civic beautification, gateway or entryway enhancement, tree planting, maintenance of homes and streets, and other measures which will promote an aesthetically desirable environment and attractive neighborhood areas.

GOAL LU.4 Preserve and strengthen the identity and quality of life of Pinole’s residential neighborhoods.

POLICY LU.4.1 Ensure all new development, renovation or remodeling preserves and strengthens Pinole’s residential neighborhoods by requiring projects to be harmoniously designed and integrated with the existing neighborhood.

GOAL LU.6 Protect and enhance the natural resources of the San Pablo Bay waterfront for the enjoyment of Pinole residents.

POLICY LU.6.3 Provide waterfront parks, pedestrian pathways and recreation areas that are safe, accessible, and attractive for public use.

Housing Element
GOAL H.2 Protect Existing Character and Heritage. Protect and enhance the integrity and distinctive character and heritage of Pinole encouraging the development of high quality, welldesigned housing and conserving existing housing.

POLICY H.2.4 Maintain Existing Housing and Neighborhood Amenities. Maintain Pinole’s lifestyle characteristics by encouraging the maintenance of existing housing stock, and in particular housing with historic value, and preserving the amenities of existing neighborhoods.

GOAL H.3 Provide Adequate Services and Facilities. Provide adequate services and facilities to meet the needs of the city’s current and future population.

POLICY H.3.1 Plan For Public Facility and Services Needs. Future development shall be planned based on public facility and service capacity, community-wide needs, sound citywide and neighborhood planning and public improvement programming.

POLICY H.3.4 Encourage new pedestrian-oriented development. Encourage new development and redevelopment that places residences in close proximity to a variety of services and facilities.

Circulation Element
GOAL CE.1 Reduce vehicle miles traveled and encourage the use of public transit.

POLICY CE.1.1 Encourage strategic growth that concentrates future development along Pinole’s three primary transit corridors (San Pablo Avenue, Appian Way and Pinole Valley Road).

POLICY CE.1.3 Encourage development that is sensitive to both local and regional transit measures and that promotes the use of alternative modes of transportation.

POLICY CE.1.4 Encourage maximum utilization of the existing public transit system and alternate modes of transportation in Pinole.

GOAL CE.3 Provide timely input and effective means (as appropriate) of programming street and highway improvements to maintain the objective peak hour level of service without detrimentally impacting community character or commercial activity.

POLICY CE.3.2. Maintain roadway network at or above established LOS thresholds.

GOAL CE.4 Establish programs to support sidewalk, trail and street enhancements, where feasible.

POLICY CE.4.5 Inventory sidewalk conditions to identify opportunities for enhancements to the circulation system and to help prioritize repair and maintenance activities as funding becomes available.

GOAL CE.5 Provide adequate parking and loading facilities while encouraging alternative means of transportation.

GOAL CE.7 Support bicycle use as a mode of transportation by enhancing infrastructure to accommodate bicycle and rides.

POLICY CE.7.1 Enhance the City’s Bikeway network through the use of Class I, II, and III bikeways.

POLICY CE.7.3 Establish a network of multi-use paths to facilitate safe and direct offstreet bicycle and pedestrian travel.

Community Services and Facilities Element
GOAL CS.1 Provide safe, attractive and efficiently designed infrastructure and sustainable facilities to serve the public.

POLICY CS.1.1 The City will strive to provide safe, attractive and efficiently designed facilities for public and quasi-public organizations.

POLICY CS.1.3 The City will endeavor to provide convenient access to community facilities and services to all areas of the community.

GOAL CS.2 Ensure and maintain a high level of public safety in the community.

POLICY CS.2.6 The City will continue to fund the repair, maintenance and expansion of facilities to respond to evolving service needs.

GOAL CS.3 Provide adequate and high-quality recreational opportunities and programs for the community.

POLICY CS.3.1 Continue to provide a variety of recreational opportunities that serve and represent all aspects of the community.

POLICY CS.3.3 Expand and organize a multi-use trail system.

GOAL CS.6 Provide adequate, economical and dependable wastewater collection service and treatment.

POLICY CS.6.1 The City shall continue to make capital improvements to the wastewater collection and treatment system to maintain system capability and reliability.

GOAL CS.7 Minimize flooding.

POLICY CS.7.1 The City will ensure that the storm drain system has adequate capacity to minimize street flooding and, where feasible, shall expand the capacity of the system to control storm flows.

GOAL CS.9 Provide economical and dependable community services while conserving energy resources.

POLICY CS.9.1 The City will seek opportunities to improve the energy efficiency of facilities and operations.

GOAL CS.10 Provide safe, efficient roadway infrastructure to support multiple modes of transportation and to meet existing and future circulation needs.

POLICY CS.10.2 The City will update, where possible, the existing roadway network to enhance pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation while maintaining safe vehicular circulation.

Health and Safety Element
GOAL HS.1 Minimize the potential for loss of life, injury, damage to property, economic and social dislocation, and unusual public expense due to natural and man-made hazards.

GOAL HS.2 Protect the community from the risk of flood damage and improve surface water quality.

POLICY HS.2.4 Continue to monitor studies that identify anticipated changes in sea level and create appropriate standards and improvements to minimize flood risks.

POLICY HS.2.5 Establish appropriate capital improvements and management programs to reduce wet weather sewer treatment demand and avoid discharge to the shallow water outfall.

GOAL HS.3 Minimize hazards of soil erosion, weak and expansive soils, potentially hazardous soils materials, other hazardous materials, geologic instability and seismic activity.

POLICY HS.3.5 Require proper handling, storage, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials to prevent leakage, potential explosions, fires or the escape of harmful gases and to prevent individually innocuous materials from combining to form hazardous substances, especially at the time of disposal.

GOAL HS.4 Ensure that government agencies, citizens and businesses are prepared for an effective response and recovery in the event of emergencies or disasters.

POLICY HS.4.1 Continue to provide essential emergency public services during natural catastrophes
POLICY HS.4.3 Incorporate technological enhancements in new and substantially remodeled structures and facilities to support and improve emergency services.

GOAL HS.6 Support multiple forms of transportation and a circulation system design that reduces vehicle trips and emissions.

POLICY HS.6.1 Promote and encourage walking and bicycling as viable forms of transportation to services, shopping and employment.

GOAL HS.7 Ensure that all new development meets or exceeds state and federal water quality standards.

POLICY HS.7.1 Support Regional, state and federal clean water programs.

POLICY HS.7.3 Reduce the transport of runoff and surface pollutants.

POLICY HS.7.6 Establish appropriate capital improvements and management programs to reduce wet weather sewer treatment demand and avoid discharge to the shallow water outfall.

Natural Resources and Open Space Element
GOAL OS.1 Ensure the preservation of natural resources by determining appropriate land use and compatibility with natural resources and open space.

POLICY OS.1.2 Agency Cooperation. Work with Federal, State and local regulatory and trustee agencies to promote the long-term sustainability of local natural resources.

Sustainability Element
GOAL SE.3 The City will reduce its contribution to climate change and mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change as appropriate.

POLICY SE.3.1 Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from City operations and community sources by a minimum of 15 percent below current or baseline levels by the year 2020.

POLICY SE.3.4 Reduce GHG emissions by reducing vehicle miles traveled and by increasing or encouraging the use of alternative fuels and transportation technologies.

POLICY SE.1.3 Enhance the energy efficiency of all City facilities.

GOAL SE.4 Optimize energy efficiency and renewable energy.

POLICY SE.4.2 Explore opportunities for City-wide expansion of Programs and Facilities related to energy efficiency and conservation.

GOAL SE.5 Achieve a solid waste diversion of 75% of the waste stream by 2020.

GOAL SE.7 Air quality will be maintained and improved for the City of Pinole and the Bay Area as a region and not decline below levels measured in early 1990’s.

POLICY SE 7.3 Support efforts to comprehensively address air quality issues through education, regulation, and innovation.

GOAL SE.8 Utilize transit options and reduce vehicle miles traveled and single-occupancy vehicle use.

POLICY SE.8.7 Work to improve Pinole’s pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and to meet the needs of all pedestrians and bicyclists.

POLICY SE.8.10 Support and promote the use of low- and zero-emissions vehicles, alternative fuels, and other measures to directly reduce emissions from motor vehicles.

Community Character Element
GOAL CC.1 Maintain Pinole’s unique qualities and sense of place to preserve the established historic and small-town character of the city.

POLICY CC.1.2 Require all new development to incorporate high-quality site design, architecture and planning to enhance the overall quality of the built environment in Pinole and create a visually interesting and aesthetically pleasing town environment.

POLICY CC.1.3 To enhance a sense of arrival and create a strong appealing image that promotes community identity, the City shall develop community entry features at key gateways or city entries along Interstate 80. Entryways shall incorporate landscaping, trees, structural architectural elements, signage, and public art.

APPENDIX II

APPENDIX II: Prioritization Matrix Category Scoring Guidelines

1. Regulatory Compliance – Compliance with regulatory mandates issued by agencies likes California State Water Resources Control Board, California Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery, Department of Fish and Wildlife, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, or other County, State and federal laws. This also includes the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and self-imposed City ordinances. The score should be based on the answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project address a current regulatory mandate? b. Will the proposed project proactively address a foreseeable (within the next 5 years) regulatory mandate?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project does
not address a
regulatory
compliance issue
The project provides a short-term
fix for an existing regulatory
compliance issue or for one
anticipated in the near future
The project resolves a
pressing or long-term
regulatory compliance
issue

2. Health/Safety – Projects that improve the overall health and safety of the community such as multi-purpose trails, transportation safety improvements, new recreation facilities, address safety issues at City facilities, enhancements to police, fire, and emergency medical services.

The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project impact the health and wellbeing or safety of Pinole residents and/or employees?
b. Does the project mitigate a serious risk or liability health/safety issue and to what degree? c. Does the project help assist the City to respond more effectively and efficiently to emergencies throughout the community?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project
does not impact
the health
and/or safety of
the community
The project addresses a serious
health and/or safety issue that
has a limited impact or
addresses a less-serious issue
but serves the health and or
safety of the broader community
The project directly
addresses a serious health
and/or safety issue that
has a widespread impact
and/or improves the health
of the community

3. Project Dependency/Bundling– The completion of the proposed project is complementary to the completion of a precursor capital project/master plan or the proposed project would be implemented efficiently if it was coordinated with another capital project. A project that is not

needed for many years would score lower than a project that needs to be completed before another project can start. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. When is the proposed project needed?
b. Do any other projects require the proposed project to be completed first? c. Does the proposed project require other projects to be completed first? d. Can the proposed project be completed in conjunction with another project for coordinated, efficient implementation?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project does
not have a project
dependency
The project can be completed
in conjunction with another
project for coordinated,
efficient implementation
The project must be
completed before another
priority project can start

4. Long-Term Planning – General Plan, Three-Corridor Specific Plan, 2020-2025 Strategic Plan, Long-Term Financial Plan, Pinole Economic Development Strategy, Master Plans, Emergency Operations Plan, Communication and Engagement Plan, Climate Action Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, Active Transportation Plan, Parks Master Plan, and departmental strategic plans which serve as a resource for the City to meet goals set forth by City departments, advisory boards and commissions, and the community at-large. Plans include documents that have been prepared internally to assure consistent adherence to industry best practices, as well as those documents that are created with the assistance of outside consultants. A component of long-term planning includes public discussion and/or public engagement. The score should be based on the answers to the following example questions:
a. Is the proposed project contained in one or more of the City’s long-term planning documents?
b. Is the proposed project listed as a high priority?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project is not
part of any longterm planning
document
The project is included in a
long-term planning
document, but may not be
high priority
The project is included
in a long-term planning
document and is a high
priority

5. State of Infrastructure – Projects that address failing infrastructure (i.e., sidewalks, streets, lighting, municipal buildings, recreation facilities) or facilities that have exceeded their useful life. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project maintain the condition or value of existing infrastructure? b. Does the proposed project avoid potential failure due to substandard conditions?

c. Will the proposed project address a facility that is outdated or exceeded its useful life? d. Is the proposed project supported by a life cycle analysis of repair versus replacement and a master plan for that type of asset?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project
maintains
existing
infrastructure
at current
service levels
The project extends the
service life of an existing
asset or adds new
infrastructure to support
growth
The project addresses existing
infrastructure which has reached
the end of its useful life and is
supported by a life cycle analysis
of repair vs. replacement

6. Operating Budget Impact – Some proposed projects may impact the operating budget for the next few years or for the life of the facility. Some proposed projects can offer cost savings or revenue generation opportunities. The score should be based on answers to the following questions:
a. Will the proposed project require additional personnel to operate? b. Will the proposed project require additional annual maintenance? c. Will the proposed project require additional equipment not included in the project budget?
d. Will the proposed project reduce staff time and City resources thereby resulting in a positive impact on the operational budget?
e. Are there cost savings or revenue generation opportunities as a result of the efficiency of the proposed project?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project will have
a negative impact
on the budget. It will
require additional
money to operate
The project will not
impact the operating
budget as it is
cost/revenue neutral
The project will have a positive
impact on the budget. It will
result in significant savings in
staff time, materials, or offer
revenue generation

7. Quality of Life – Projects that provide widespread economic prosperity, recreational and cultural activities, environmental benefits, beautify Pinole, and attract new residents and visitors. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project help to create a beautiful and clean community? b. Does the proposed project encourage participation in recreational and cultural activities?
c. Does the proposed project attract new residents, businesses, or visitors? d. Does the proposed project increase environmental stewardship?

e. Does the proposed project contribute towards economic development and revitalization efforts?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project will not
have an impact on the
quality of life for the
Pinole community
The project has
moderate impact on the
quality of life for the
Pinole community
The project greatly
impacts the quality of life
for the Pinole community

8. Grant Funding – The proposed project is partially or fully supported by grants from State or Federal funds. The percentage of total cost funded by an external source will determine the score in this category.

Scoring scale:
0 1 2 3 4 5
0% - 16%
External
Funding
17% - 33%
External
Funding
34% - 50%
External
Funding
51% - 67%
External
Funding
68% - 84%
External
Funding
85% to
100%
External
Funding

9. Sustainability and Conservation – The proposed project furthers the City’s sustainability and conservation goals. The score should be based on answers to the following example questions:
a. Does the proposed project improve the health of the community and natural environment through sustainable designs with improved air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change? b. Does the proposed project increase use of active modes of transportation and reduces the need for auto-dependency?
c. Does the proposed project incorporate design that meets or exceeds federal and State standards in the field of energy efficiency, such as State of California Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards, LEED building standards, etc.?
Scoring scale:
0 2-3 5
The project will not
impact the City’s
ability to achieve
sustainability and
conservation goals
The project will have a
modest positive impact
on the City’s ability to
achieve sustainability
and conservation goals
The project will have a
significant positive impact on
the City’s ability to achieve
sustainability and
conservation goals

PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT I.2.

DATE: JUNE 10, 2024
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DAVID HANHAM, PLANNING MANAGER
SUBJECT: RESELECT MEMBERS FOR THE AD-HOC PLANNING COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE

RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission select new members for the Ad-Hoc Planning Commission Subcommittee.

BACKGROUND
Following the new Planning Commission appointments by City Council, the members selected to serve on the 2024-2025 Ad-Hoc Planning Commission Sub-Committee are no longer all available and the committee needs to be reselected.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
The Ad-Hoc Subcommittee is composed of three Planning Commissioners who meet sporadically to provide input on Planning Commission-related projects on an as-needed basis.

On April 22, 2024, Planning Commission selected three members to serve on the committee. On May 7, 2024, the City Council made appointments for spots on the Planning Commission where terms were set to expire after April 2024. New candidates and incumbents applied for consideration by City Council. One of the members who would have served on the Ad-Hoc Planning Commission Sub-Committee was not selected by City Council to serve a new term on the Planning Commission, which left an opening in the subcommittee.

As a result, Planning Commission is requested to reselect members for the Planning Commission Ad-Hoc Subcommittee. The reselection may include reaffirming the two members selected on April 22, 2024 (Chair Menis and Commissioner Bender) would continue to serve and selecting a new third member. Alternatively, the reselection may include reopening multiple spots on the subcommittee to be filled.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ATTACHMENTS

None