Pinole City Council
December 2, 2025

CITY COUNCIL
Cameron Sasai, Mayor
Anthony Tave, Mayor Pro Tem
Norma Martínez-Rubin, Council Member
Devin T. Murphy, Council Member
Maureen Toms, Council Member

PINOLE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING *AMENDED* AGENDA
December 2, 2025
5:00 PM
Amended items 4A and 4B
Attend in Person: PINOLE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS - 2131 PEAR STREET OR
Attend VIA ZOOM TELECONFERENCE – Details provided below How to Submit Public Comments:

In Person:

Attend meeting at the Pinole City Council Chambers, fill out a yellow public comment card and submit it to the City Clerk.

Via Zoom:

Members of the public may submit a live remote public comment via Zoom video conferencing. Download the Zoom mobile app from the Apple Appstore or Google Play. If you are using a desktop computer, you can test your connection to Zoom by clicking here. Zoom also allows you to join the meeting by phone.

From a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89335000272
Webinar ID: 893 3500 0272
By phone: +1 (669) 900-6833 or +1 (253) 215-8782 or +1 (346) 248-7799 • Speakers will be asked to provide their name and city of residence, although providing this is not required for participation.
• Each speaker will be afforded up to 3 minutes to speak (subject to modification by the Mayor) • Speakers will be muted until their opportunity to provide public comment.

When the Mayor opens the comment period for the item you wish to speak on, please use the “raise hand” feature (or press *9 if connecting via telephone) which will alert staff that you have a comment to provide and press *6 to unmute. To comment with your video enabled, please let the City Clerk know you would like to turn your camera on once you are called to speak.

Written Comments:

All comments received before 3:00 pm the day of the meeting will be posted on the City’s website on the agenda page (Agenda Page Link) and provided to the City Council prior to the meeting. Written comments will not be read aloud during the meeting. Email comments to [email protected] Please indicate which item on the agenda you are commenting on in the subject line of your email.

City Council
Agenda - December 2, 2025

OTHER WAYS TO WATCH THE MEETING
LIVE ON CHANNEL 26. They are retelecast the following week. The Community TV Channel 26 schedule is published on the city’s website at www.pinole.gov.

VIDEO-STREAMED LIVE ON THE CITY’S WEBSITE, www.pinole.gov and remain archived on the site for five (5) years.

If none of these options are available to you, or you need assistance with public comment, please contact the City Clerk, Heather Bell-Spears at (510) 724-8928 or [email protected].

Americans With Disabilities Act: In compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, if you need special assistance to participate in a City Meeting or you need a copy of the agenda, or the agenda packet in an appropriate alternative format, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (510) 724-8928. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Note: Staff reports are available for inspection on the City Website at www.pinole.gov. You may also contact the City Clerk via e-mail at [email protected].

Ralph M. Brown Act. Gov. Code § 54950. In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly. The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies, which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.

City Council
Agenda - December 2, 2025

1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IN HONOR OF THE US MILITARY TROOPS

2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Before we begin, we would like to acknowledge the Ohlone people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. We pay our respects to the Ohlone elders, past, present, and future, who call this place, Ohlone Land, the land that Pinole sits upon, their home. We are proud to continue their tradition of coming together and growing as a community. We thank the Ohlone community for their stewardship and support, and we look forward to strengthening our ties as we continue our relationship of mutual respect and understanding.

3. ROLL CALL, CITY CLERK’S REPORT & STATEMENT OF CONFLICT An official who has a conflict must, prior to consideration of the decision: (1) publicly identify in detail the financial interest that causes the conflict; (2) recuse himself /herself from discussing and voting on the matter; and (3) leave the room until after the decision has been made, Cal. Gov't Code § 87105.

4. CONVENE TO A CLOSED SESSION
Citizens may address the Council regarding a Closed Session item prior to the Council adjourning into the Closed Session, by first providing a speaker card to the City Clerk.

A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Gov. Code § 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: Human Resources Director, Stacy Shell, Finance Director, Markisha Guillory, and Gregory Ramirez, IEDA
Employee organizations: The Pinole Police Employees Association (PPEA) B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Gov. Code § 54957
Title: Acting City Manager

5. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION TO ANNOUNCE RESULTS OF CLOSED SESSION

6. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (Public Comments)
Citizens may speak under any item not listed on the Agenda. The time limit is 3 minutes and is subject to modification by the Mayor. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker. Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Council meeting. PLEASE SEE THE COVERSHEET OF THE

AGENDA FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO SUBMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS

7. REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mayor Report

1. Announcements
B. Mayoral & Council Appointments
C. City Council Committee Reports & Communications
D. Council Requests for Future Agenda Items

City Council
Agenda - December 2, 2025

E. City Manager Report / Department Staff
F. City Attorney Report

8. RECOGNITIONS / PRESENTATIONS / COMMUNITY EVENTS
A. Proclamations

1. None
B. Presentations

1. Contra Costa County Regional Alternative Compliance System Overview

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and noncontroversial. These items will be enacted by one motion and without discussion. If, however, any interested party or Council member(s) wishes to comment on an item, they may do so before action is taken on the Consent Calendar. Following comments, if a Council member wishes to discuss an item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and taken up in order after adoption of the Consent Calendar.

A. Approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on November 18, 2025.

B. Receive the November 15, 2025 – November 28, 2025, List of Warrants in the Amount of $683,568.25 and the November 21, 2025 Payroll in the Amount of $584,043.92.

C. Approving the Application for and/or Execution of Grant Funds up to $736,370 from the Ocean Protection Council (OPC) for the Pinole-Hercules Multi-jurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan Action: Adopt a Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Lilly Whalen, Kapil Amin) D. Second Reading of an Ordinance to Adopt the 2025 California Building Standards Code and Update the City’s Building and Fire Code and Adoption of a Resolution Approving Findings to Support Local Modifications to the 2025 California Building Code Action: Adopt Ordinance on Second Reading and Adopt Resolution (Lilly Whalen, Keith Marks) E. Approve Resolution to Add 1.0 Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Information Technology Technician Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Fiona Epps) F. FY 2024/25 Development Impact Fee Report (AB 1600) Action: Receive a Report and Adopt a Resolution (Markisha Guillory)
G. Initiate Formation of the Appian Village Residential Lighting Assessment District and Order preparation of the required Engineer’s Report pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Lilly Whalen, David Hanham)
H. Receive a Report on the Status of the Information Technology (IT) Plan Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22 Through FY 2025/26 and Development of the IT Plan FY 2026/27 Through FY 2031/32 Action: Receive a Report (Fiona Epps)
I. Approval Of Agreement Between The City Of Pinole And Diablo Roofing, Inc. – Public Safety Building Roof Replacement Under Project # FA1702 Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Heba El-Guindy)

City Council
Agenda - December 2, 2025

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Citizens wishing to speak regarding a Public Hearing item should fill out a speaker card prior to the completion of the presentation, by first providing a speaker card to the City Clerk. An official who engaged in an ex parte communication that is the subject of a Public Hearing must disclose the communication on the record prior to the start of the Public Hearing.

A. Public Hearing and Introduction of an Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.68 to Title 2 of the Pinole Municipal Code Restricting the Use of City-Owner or City-Controlled Property for Federal Civil Immigration Enforcement Activities Action: Hold a Public Hearing, Waive First Reading and Introduce and Ordinance Adding Chapter 2.68 to Title 2 of the Pinole Municipal Code (Eric Casher)

11. OLD BUSINESS
A. None

12. NEW BUSINESS
A. Discussion of Process for Establishing the Office of Elected Mayor Action: Receive Report and Provide Direction. (Eric Casher)

13. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (Continued from Item 6) (Public Comments) Open only to members of the public who did not speak under the first Citizens to Be Heard, Agenda Item 6 Citizens may speak under any item not listed on the Agenda. The time limit is 3 minutes for City Council items and is subject to modification by the Mayor. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future meeting.

14. ADJOURNMENT to the Regular City Council Meeting of December 16, 2025 in Remembrance of Amber Swartz.

I hereby certify under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing Agenda was posted on the bulletin board at the main entrance of Pinole City Hall, 2131 Pear Street Pinole, CA, and on the City’s website, not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date set forth on this agenda. _______________________
Heather Bell-Spears, CMC
City Clerk
POSTED: Tuesday, November 25, 2025 at 4:55 pm

Contra Costa County Regional Alternative
Compliance System Overview
Rinta Perkins, Interim Program Manager

Introduction

What Are the Challenges with the Existing System?
• The Municipal Regional
Stormwater Permit (MRP)
requires low impact
development (LID)/green
stormwater infrastructure
(GSI) to be implemented:
– On new development and
redevelopment projects (C.3.b)
– To retrofit a proportion of
permittee impervious surfaces
(C.3.j)
– To address PCBs/mercury
TMDLs in San Francisco Bay
(C.11/C.12)

What Are the Challenges with the Existing System?
Challenges:
• Some development sites have
physical or site use constraints
to implement GSI
• Distributed GSI is costly and
requires considerable effort to
maintain
• PCBs/mercury pollution is
concentrated in certain areas
of Contra Costa County Contra Costa County PCBs Load Distribution

How can Regional Alternative Compliance (RAC) address these challenges?
• The RAC System allows an off-site option for new and
redevelopment projects to meet MRP C.3 requirements
– Other regulated stormwater dischargers may also participate (e.g., Caltrans)
• The RAC System allows for investment in regional GSI projects that:
– Are less expensive to implement and maintain per acre treated – Can be located to target old industrial areas
– Could provide multiple benefits
AND
• The RAC System establishes designated O&M funding to
ensure long-term performance of facilities

What is the Legal Basis for Alternative Compliance?
• Alternative compliance systems
are legally enabled through
existing rules, guidance, and plans
• Contra Costa County (CCC) RAC
System was developed in input
from:
– CCC Permittees
– Advisory Committee made from nine
SF Bay Area Counties + Caltrans +
Port of Oakland
– Water Quality Control Board and
EPA
– Internal and external Legal
Reviewers

RAC System
Overview

Contra Costa County RAC System

RAC Joint Powers Authority (JPA) and Community Facilities District (CFD)
R A C J o i n t P o w e r s
A g r e e m e n t
I n i t i a l M e m b e r s
Permittee
1 Permittee
3 Permittee
2 Permittee
4 Permittee
5 Permittee
6 CIP Projects
Non-Profits
R A C S y s t e m P a r t i c i p a t i o n
S e l l e r s & B u y e r s

1. Form
Community
Facilities
District

2. RAC
Administration
Private
Developers
Functions of JPA

RAC System
Implementation
Process

RAC Joint Power Authority (JPA)
• JPA Formation and Independence
o A legally separate entity formed with its own liabilities, independent from agency members.
• Term Sheet and Membership
o Outlines JPA powers; how new members are admitted, and legislative body approval.
• Operational Structure and Staffing
o Contract manager instead of hiring employees (avoid pension liabilities and increase flexibility).
• Financial Responsibilities
o Limited to the JPA and shared administrative expenses among members.

RAC Community Facilities District
CFD formed with initial taxable property only
and multi-jurisdiction “future annexation area”
Properties annex into the CFD as
they to opt to participate in RAC
System
CFD formation requires three
meetings of JPA governing board
JPA authorizes the CFD to levy special taxes to finance the acquisition, improvement, rehabilitation, and maintenance of stormwater infrastructure

RAC Community Facilities District (Continued)
• Annexing property owner executes “unanimous
approval” (voting in favor of special taxes etc.)
• JPA legislative body may confirm annexations by
resolution
Annexation of Parcels into the
CFD from Future Annexation Area
• Resolution of intention to add territory
• Public hearing and resolution determining addition
of territory to future annexation area
When new public agencies join
the JPA, the JPA legislative body
may add new members’ territory
to the “future annexation area”

Next Steps for
Implementation

Implementation Steps and Timeline

Next Steps
• Twelve agencies are interested in joining RAC JPA
• City/Town/County attorney to review and comment on JPA term sheet
• Attend a kick-off meeting
• Receive follow-up materials and templates (incl. resolution) • Adoption of resolution and approval of JPA agreement by agency’s governing body

Contact
Rinta Perkins
Interim Program Manager
[email protected]
(925) 313-2392

Thank You!

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES
November 18, 2025

1. CALL TO ORDER & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IN HONOR OF THE US MILITARY TROOPS
The City Council Meeting was held in a hybrid format (in-person and via Zoom videoconference and broadcast) from the Pinole Council Chambers, 2131 Pear Street, Pinole, California. Mayor Pro Tem Tave called the Regular Meeting of the City Council to order at 5:00 p.m. and led the Pledge of Allegiance.

2. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Before we begin, we would like to acknowledge the Ohlone people, who are the traditional custodians of this land. We pay our respects to the Ohlone elders, past, present and future, who call this place, Ohlone Land, the land that Pinole sits upon, their home. We are proud to continue their tradition of coming together and growing as a community. We thank the Ohlone community for their stewardship and support, and we look forward to strengthening our ties as we continue our relationship of mutual respect and understanding.

3. ROLL CALL, CITY CLERK’S REPORT & STATEMENT OF CONFLICT An official who has a conflict must, prior to consideration of the decision; (1) publicly identify in detail the financial interest that causes the conflict; (2) recuse himself/herself from discussing and voting on the matter; and (3) leave the room until after the decision has been made, Cal. Gov.

Code § 87105.

A. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT
Cameron Sasai, Mayor*
Anthony Tave, Mayor Pro Tem
Norma Martinez-Rubin, Council Member
Devin Murphy, Council Member*
Maureen Toms, Council Member
*Participating remotely under the provisions of the Brown Act B. STAFF PRESENT
Kelcey Young, City Manager
Heather Bell-Spears, City Clerk
Eric Casher, City Attorney
Fiona Epps, Communications Director
Andrea Dwyer, Community Services Director
Lilly Whalen, Community Development Director
Markisha Guillory, Finance Director
Roxane Stone, Deputy City Clerk

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

City Clerk Heather Bell-Spears announced the agenda had been posted on November 14, 2025 at 12:40 p.m. with all legally required written notices. Written comments had been received in advance of the meeting, distributed to the City Council and staff, posted to the City website and made available to the public to view in the Council Chambers.

Following an inquiry, the Council reported there were no conflicts with any items on the agenda.

4. CONVENE TO A CLOSED SESSION
Citizens may address the Council regarding a Closed Session item prior to the Council adjourning into the Closed Session, by first providing a speaker card to the City Clerk.

A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Gov. Code § 54957.6
Agency designated representatives: City Manager Kelcey Young, Human Resources Director Stacy Shell, Finance Director Markisha Guillory and Gregory Ramirez, IEDA
Employee organizations: The Pinole Police Employees Association (PPEA) B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Gov. Code § 54957
Title: Interim City Manager

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Stacy McPhonson expressed frustration that Pinole Police Department (PPD) employees were constantly the lowest paid and the PPD had experienced difficulty retaining and recruiting officers due to inadequate compensation. When the City Council freed up 25 percent of its reserves related to unfunded liabilities for retirement, the PPD was unable to retain officers and had a high turnover rate while the City’s unfunded liability continued to increase. PPD employees were retiring at a higher rate and if the City did not invest in existing employees the unfunded liability would only continue to increase. She understood 25 percent of the total operating budget was to go towards the unfunded liability, which expense was not due for about 20-years. The City was not paying all employees a competitive wage and not funding infrastructure, parks or making pavement repairs. PPD officers had been working 12-hours a day for two weeks straight or more, which was a liability for the City due to fatigue and other factors. Statistics showed that since 2016, the City of Pinole had lost a significant number of employes and over half just quit.

Presently, PPD officers on the job had five years or less experience. Her husband served in the PPD 20 years ago and two decades later the same problems persisted without being addressed.

She urged the City Council to finally address this issue.

Alphonso Black, Sergeant at Arms, Pinole Police Employees Association (PPEA), spoke to the importance of police in the community, with safety not merely a service but a foundation upon which every other City priority was built. He reported the men and women of the PPD stood between order and chaos, often when residents were facing the worst day of their lives. He emphasized that policing was more than an emergency response in that officers were mentors, problem solvers, protectors and intervened in domestic crises, helped troubled youth find a better path, checked on seniors who lived alone and helped build relationships that prevented conflict before it became a call for service.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Mr. Black added that PPD officers were the steady calm presence residents relied on and trusted when calling 9-1-1. Police Officers knew the streets, families, challenges and hopes and when the City empowered the PPD with staffing, training and strong support, officers helped shape a city that was safe for the community and full of opportunity. He referenced the City’s April 2022 community survey that had delivered a clear and unambiguous message, that out of 11 potential initiatives, 98 percent of responders identified public safety as the highest priority. If public safety was the community’s foremost priority and the City’s own data confirmed that it was, assuring the recruitment and retention of qualified officers must be treated as an essential priority of City government. The City Council’s choices to increase wages determined whether there were a sufficient number of officers to respond quickly and retain experienced professionals that knew the City. Experienced officers in uniform could improve the staffing numbers and improve the quality of life for residents, reduce overtime costs, improve morale and ensure residents would continue to trust that officers would respond when they were needed the most. Investing in the police was not simply an expense but an investment in stability, dignity and peace of mind and a statement that every resident deserved safety as a basic expectation and not a privilege. He asked the City Council to shape the future of the City and support the PPD.

Amy Eubanks, President, PPEA, explained that officers and dispatchers continued to work under wages that were not competitive and did not keep pace with inflation, which was hurting the City financially and operationally through turnover and long-term costs. The City’s Long-Term Financial Plan (LTFP) published in 2022 and which ran from Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 through 2026- 27, made several things clear. Since early 2021, inflation rose from three to eight percent and during that period, PPD officers received no meaningful market adjustments. Staffing had shown the results through the loss of experienced officers, high training costs, lower retention and ultimately reduced services to the community.

Ms. Eubanks referred to dispatch services and stated the City of Pinole paid only 30 percent of the cost of the Tri-City Dispatch Center, with the cities of Hercules and San Pablo covering the remaining 70 percent. Dispatch salaries were even a smaller burden on the City’s General Fund, yet the City still did not offer competitive wages. Pinole continued to lose trained dispatchers to neighboring agencies since the pay did not keep pace with the market while the City’s reserves grew from $8.5 million in 2021 to a projected $11 million in 2026/27. In 2021, the City’s reserves were at 58 percent, far above the policy level and the City Council recently lowered the reserve requirement from 50 to 35 percent. The LTFP also identified the City of Pinole as a low-risk city, which generally needed only about 17 percent in reserves, and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) did not recommend the high reserve levels the City maintained.

Ms. Eubanks noted the City Council intentionally lowered the required reserves, and she asked why the PPEA was being told that competitive wages could not be offered. Also, in terms of the City’s pension and Other Post-Employment Benefit (OPEB) liabilities, the City repeatedly incurred those liabilities, which cost involved employees who retired years ago, not today’s PPD officers.

She suggested there was a responsible solution. As the City created a 115 Trust for pension obligations, the City could create an OPEB Trust, and the reserves above the recommended levels could strategically be used to pay down the liabilities and remove them as a barrier to competitive compensation. She emphasized the cost of the turnover was real, there was lost experience, months of overtime to cover vacancies, training expenses for new hires and increased pension liability when officers did not stay long enough to balance the system.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Ms. Eubanks stated that retention was a financial issue, and the only proven way to fix retention was to offer competitive wages, not Cost-of-Living-Adjustments (COLAs) or delayed increases, but actual market competitive compensation. The City now had Measure I revenue, strong reserves, a low risk financial profile, and clear tools to manage long-term liabilities. With all that in place, she asked why the City could not offer salaries to keep officers and dispatchers in Pinole.

If the City wanted to stop the cycle of vacancies, turnover and rising liabilities, it needed to invest in the people who kept the community safe. Retention saved money, competitive wages retained employees and financially the City had the means and could not afford not to provide competitive wages.

Debbie Long commented there was nothing she could say that had not already been said by those in the trenches and that was who the City needed to listen to. She stood by the comments she made during the November 4, 2025 City Council meeting. She emphasized that injury was a real risk to officers, particularly when there were only two officers on duty at one time. Crime was real, and she relayed how if only two officers were trying to apprehend a suspect, the risk of injury to the officers was real and that came with consequences as well. She asked the City Council to get the contract with the PPEA done. The PPD was overworked and underpaid and while Pinole may be a smaller City, there was crime around it and it came into the City every day.

Ms. Long added that with the City Manager now leaving, the contract would be placed in the hands of an Interim City Manager. She did not want someone who did not know what was going on to handle the contract. She wanted someone to get it done immediately. The holidays were here; crime would only increase with more calls for service and the City still only had two officers on the streets unless the City had mandated overtime. She pointed out the Council members who were not present in-person had supported the PPD in the past and should not allow their personal agendas to get in the way of public safety. This contract needed to be done tonight, and if not, before the end of the year.

Tamiko Scott, Vice President, PPEA, reported she served the City of Pinole over the past four years as a generational officer since her father had retired from the PPD. She emphasized her commitment to the City and the PPD, detailed how most officers responded to incidents that most people would never have to experience, and stated that officers were called upon daily to help with the most minor concerns and the worst moments of someone’s life. She also relayed an incident in which she responded to a Council member who was not present in-person, as part of her job and duty to the City.

Ms. Scott emphasized every day that passed without a contract sent a message that officers were underappreciated, disrespected, and undervalued by the people they were entrusted to serve.

She reported a Council member had stated that the PPD staffing was adequate, but if it was adequate, she questioned why she had to work 130-hours in one single pay period; not once but on multiple occasions. If that was what adequate looked like, it needed to be reevaluated. She reiterated the PPD was one of, if not the, lowest paid agency in Contra Costa County despite the fact PPD officers shouldered numerous ancillary duties beyond daily patrol responsibilities. If the PPD was to remain the self-sustained Police Department it had worked so hard to build, it must be able to offer something meaningful towards retention. The PPD was currently a stepping stone for those seeking better pay, benefits and morale elsewhere. PPD officers continued to show up, provide the highest level of service, and protect the citizens of Pinole. Officers were asking for fairness, respect and a contract that reflected the value of the work being done every day.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Barry Duggan, a member of the PPEA, asked why the Mayor was not present in-person. The PPEA was the largest union and was still out of contract. He was concerned with the prolonged period the City’s largest union had been out of contract, five months and counting, and suggested it was unreasonable for the City to allow this to continue for such an extended period of time.

Providing fair compensation was essential to retain employees and maintain adequate staffing levels, which enabled them to provide the best possible services to the citizenry. He found it curious the City now and historically had been satisfied with the PPD at minimum staffing levels, with officers and dispatchers almost at the bottom of the salary surveys for wages in and outside the County. The City Council seemed eager to invest in everything but the PPD, City infrastructure and Public Works and rather diverted funds for more staffing at City Hall with directors and assistants to directors, rather than provide fair wages for current PPD staff.

Mr. Duggan noted the City recently increased its director and assistant to director positions while the PPD had been denied a Hiring Manager essential to assisting with the PPD property records, dispatch management and helping to lessen the load of the command staff and officers so they could spend more time on the street. Without a solid foundation, the City could not truly thrive and maintain the highest standards that made it such a desirable place to live. He urged the City Council to prioritize contract negotiations with the PPEA and to invest in the PPD workforce for the benefit of all residents.

Jamie Huckaby, one of the lead dispatchers for the PPD who had served the City for almost 10- years, reported during that time the communications center had been fully staffed on only two occasions and dispatchers had been lost to higher paying agencies. The communications center served three cities and Pinole dispatchers were required to maintain knowledge and readiness well beyond the limits of the City of Pinole. Despite that work load and responsibility, Pinole dispatchers remained the lowest paid in the County. The cities of Hercules and San Pablo funded more than half of their salaries and San Pablo’s contract included a five percent annual raise for dispatchers. Other cities recognized the value of qualified, trained and professional emergency dispatchers and Pinole should as well. She also asked that the City consider increasing bilingual incentive pay from three to ten percent, which was the same rate the City already paid bilingual staff at City Hall, staff who do not deal with life and death situations.

Ms. Huckaby expressed concern the skills of those employees were valued less than clerical positions, which was demoralizing and unfair. Dispatchers and officers were on duty 24/7, always showed up for the City and asked the City to show up for them. She emphasized this was her one day off and rather than being with her family, she had to attend the City Council meeting to ask for consideration of a contract.

Ms. Huckaby added she also attended the November 4, 2025 City Council meeting. At that time, one of the Council members who was not present in person, smirked and rolled his eyes during the meeting, while officers were speaking, which reaction made it clear how some members of the City Council perceived and valued the PPD. She emphasized the community and everyone deserved better and if the City Council truly valued public safety, the PPEA should not be without a contract and employees should not have to attend the meeting on their day off and plead for what other officers and dispatchers received. Employees had shown their commitment to the City for years and they asked the City Council to show its commitment to them.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Council member Murphy reported for the record that he was present, had been online since 5:02 p.m. and Mayor Sasai was also present online.

Mayor Pro Tem Tave asked whether Mayor Sasai was present on Zoom.

City Clerk Bell-Spears clarified that Council member Murphy and Mayor Sasai were participating remotely and on Zoom. Given the broadcast limitations, they were both not visible on screen the entire time.

Maria Alegria referenced Item 4B, and asked as the City Council moved into Closed Session that the Council not add the PPEA contract responsibility to an employee who was not already present given serious contract issues the Council needed to deal with. She recommended the City Council bring someone on board for the next four to six months who was a good administrator, good people person and who would build confidence with City staff and the community. She asked that the City Council do its due diligence to ensure the use of a search firm that engaged with the community as the Council considered a new City Manager. She wished the City Council well getting someone on board.

Bob Kopp commented that in the last few years the City had gone downhill. There was a lot of money the City should be using for the PPD, although the Council majority had voted to have a $12,000 yearly travel allowance increase and a raise for the City Council, which he found ridiculous. He asked the City Attorney to check into some of the reasons why there was always a 3-2 vote of the City Council on almost everything that came up. He suggested the money the City Council approved for the travel allowance and raise should be put back into the General Fund for the PPD. While not a lot of money, it was money that should be spent on the PPD rather than the Council majority to take a tour. He understood one Council member traveled to Washington D.C. at taxpayer expense but there had been no report out of any benefit to the City of Pinole.

He suggested it had been a paid vacation at the City’s expense and suggested the City should be saving its money for law enforcement and Public Works.

Mr. Kopp also understood the City had been losing money with respect to the placement of handicap ramps which had been approved by the federal government. He suggested the City could not pay out of pocket to build new handicap ramps where existing ramps were located and originally approved. Those monies could be better spent to repair potholes and different things that needed to be addressed. He urged support for the PPD and the Public Works Department.

Cathy McFarland commented the City Council was to serve and protect the community and not systematically destroy and financially bury it and residents in debt. She asked why the City had not worked out a contract with the PPEA for months given that it was a top priority and citizens had stated time and time again it was essential to keep residents safe. If there was a known criminal in Pinole, she wanted that person picked up and arrested by the PPD or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). No criminal should get a “get out of jail free” card because of who came to arrest them or where.

Ms. McFarland also understood the City was considering two cannabis dispensaries without much regard to the many negative effects on the community. She had shared during the November 4, 2025 City Council meeting that the top 20 dangerous cities in the State of California, including the cities of Richmond and Antioch were in Contra Costa County.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Both cities were listed in a presentation on cannabis dispensaries and Ms. McFarland suggested the State was numb with these cannabis dispensaries and the County had millions in dollars in cannabis sales. She highlighted the taxes the City received and the City Council’s plans for possible future tax increases to raise revenue, although residents were already paying for existing bonds, some of which were being paid for half of one’s lifetime along with a recent existing sales tax increase. She also detailed the recently approved City operating budget figures and suggested the City was slowly being strangled and financially abusing residents to the point they were losing homes and being put out into the streets. The City needed to make major cuts, sell parcels of land the City owned and work on a budget with no deficit.

Maria Figueroa, a dispatcher for the PPD, stated she began her career as the Administrative Assistant to the Police Chief and later transitioned into dispatch, a role where the stakes were life and death. She also lived in the City of Pinole; in a home she rarely saw due to the overtime and requirement of the work. Dispatchers were constantly short-staffed and the burden fell on everyone. She suggested the dispatchers were understaffed since the compensation did not reflect the responsibility or the work load. Dispatchers and PPD officers were the lowest paid in the entire County. Dispatchers were required to operate across three cities and each had its own policies and procedures, whereas the other dispatchers were responsible only for a single city, with less responsibility but paid more than Pinole dispatchers. As a bilingual dispatcher, she only received a three percent increase for that skill.

Ms. Figueora explained that before transitioning into dispatch, she had earned five percent and other City employees currently earned 10 percent, leading her to feel her skills were not valued.

Her ability to communicate in Spanish allowed her to assist callers immediately without having to wait for a translator given that when in an emergency every second mattered. That skill saved time, improved outcomes and in some cases saved lives The PPD operated 24/7 and she spent more time on the job than she did with her own family. She too was concerned the City Council did not value the PPD and dispatchers who wanted action, a fair contract and employees’ value to be recognized. She urged the City Council to invest in the employees or continue to lose them.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
Mayor Pro Tem Tave thanked the speakers for their comments. He reported the City Council would convene into Closed Session as agendized and estimated a return time of 7:00 p.m.

5. RECONVENE IN OPEN SESSION TO ANNOUNCE RESULTS OF CLOSED SESSION At 7:11 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Tave reconvened the meeting into open session. There was no reportable action from the Closed Sessions.

6. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (Public Comments)
Citizens may speak under any item not listed on the Agenda. The time limit is 3 minutes and is subject to modification by the Mayor. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Council meeting.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Rafael Menis announced that a protest had been planned on November 22, 2025 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the intersection of San Pablo and Tennent Avenues, to protest against various actions of the federal government. He also reported November 20, 2025 was Trans Day of Remembrance. He submitted a full list of names to the City Council and appreciated the publication of the list, but took the opportunity to read into the record the names of the 31 individuals who died during the period from October 2024 through September 2025. He reported that all of the individuals killed had been either trans or had another non-binary identity. He mourned their loss in their communities, the country as a whole and hoped one day there would be no names on the list.

Debbie Long expressed concern the City Council did not listen to what the public had to say, unless it was someone who supported Council members. She referenced the discussion during the November 4, 2025 City Council meeting about cannabis sales and the direction to staff to come back with more information regarding cannabis distribution within the City. Council member Toms asked the Mayor if the City Council could first have a Town Hall meeting for citizen input, but the Mayor would not amend the motion and the motion carried by a 3-2 vote. That action was in contradiction to a motion by Council member Toms, which had been offered several meetings ago, asking for staff input on limited truck weight limits on San Pablo Avenue. The Mayor would not approve the motion asking for a Town Hall meeting first on weight limits on San Pablo Avenue/downtown roads. She found that to be hypocritical on the part of the Mayor and suggested it was more important to have a Town Hall meeting on cannabis distribution centers first before the topic of truck weight limits on San Pablo Avenue. She noted a cannabis club on the dam road had already been broken into two times this year, and given that situation, impacts on the PPD should have been discussed, particularly in light of the fact the PPD was working without a contract.

Ms. Long added the clock tower had graffiti for some time, and she understood the owner was responsible for maintaining the clock. She asked that staff contact the property owner and allow a short window for cleanup. Additionally for those Council members participating remotely, she asked whether citizens had a right to know where they were at this moment since she understood that was something the public was allowed to know. She also referenced the consideration of renaming Bayfront Park, and commented that two people had been instrumental in the development of the park; Jack Meehan and Peter Murray, neither of whom had any input in the name change. She understood why the City wanted the name changed but asked that the name of the park be renamed Rookǒs – Bayfront Park to keep some history of the park and the members who worked 25-years to get the park developed.

7. REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mayor Report

1. Announcements
Mayor Sasai reported he had joined two regional committee meetings, the Contra Costa Mayors Conference and the WestCAT Board of Directors. The WestCAT Board of Directors discussed updates to the WestCAT Evolution Program and updates to routes within the region, particularly for the City of Hercules.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

A final draft of the program would come back at a future WestCAT meeting. Mayor Sasai also joined Council members Toms and Murphy for the ribbon-cutting ceremony for a new business just opened on Fitzgerald Drive for Sourdough & Co.

Mayor Sasai personally thanked the PPD and Police Chief for the apprehension and arrest of a suspect related to spray painting small businesses and expressing displeasure with City officials.

He again thanked the PPD for its amazing work. He otherwise wished everyone a happy holiday and looked forward to returning to the City Council in December.

B. Mayoral & Council Appointments

1. Appointment to the Contra Costa County Library Commission City Clerk Bell-Spears presented the staff report dated November 18, 2025, and recommended the City Council reappoint George Pursley to the Contra Costa County Library Commission to a term expiring June 30, 2028.

Responding to questions from Council member Martinez-Rubin, City Clerk Bell-Spears clarified she was unaware of any other applicants for the position. Staff had been contacted by the Clerk to the Contra Costa County Library Commission that a reappointment was required. Staff reached out to Mr. Pursley to ensure he remained interested in serving in the role. She also clarified the body itself handled its own recruitment, but if City staff was asked to do additional advertisement that could be done and had been done in the past.

Council member Murphy asked whether Mr. Pursley was present in-person, and City Clerk BellSpears understood Mr. Pursley planned to attend the meeting but was not present in-person or online.

Council member Murphy asked that Mr. Pursley be invited to attend a December City Council meeting to provide an update on the Contra Costa County Library Commission.

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Irma Ruport stated she knew Mr. Pursley personally and she approved of his nomination and appointment.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
ACTION: Motion by Council members Murphy/Toms to appoint George Pursley to the Contra Costa County Library Commission, to a term expiring June 30, 2028.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
C. City Council Committee Reports & Communications

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Council member Toms reported she attended the ribbon-cutting ceremony for Sourdough & Co.

She welcomed the business to Pinole. She also planned to attend upcoming meetings for Marin Clean Energy (MCE) as the Alternate while Council member Murphy was out of town, and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Executive Committee as the Alternate while the primary was out of town.

Council member Murphy reported he had no report at this time, but would provide updates at the December 2, 2025 City Council meeting.

Council member Martinez-Rubin reported the Ad Hoc Committee to Review Council Procedures had met with the City Attorney and the City Clerk to introduce the task that would include the review of a handbook for members of the City Council that had been prepared by staff. The handbook would include chapters on the overview of the City Council/City Manager form of government, City Council procedures, and distinguish the roles between the obligations, responsibilities and authorities of Council members relative to the City Manager and ethics resources.

Council member Martinez-Rubin reported she also attended the November 11, 2025 Veterans Day ceremony at Fernandez Park. The community was pleased the event returned to the City and had been included in the budget for the Community Services Department. There had been feedback that along with the celebration there should be some solemnity to the event. In the past, that solemnity had been provided by reading the names of veterans who lived in Pinole and had passed away in service. She suggested that be brought back for the next year’s event and expressed the willingness to help with any research.

Council member Martinez-Rubin also reported on her attendance at the WestCAT Board of Directors meeting with presentations on WestCAT Evolution, which outlined a number of activities for the public and those interested in public transit, on how it could better serve the community and region (Hercules, part of the unincorporated area and Pinole) and continue with the different lines of service, fixed lines and paratransit services and possibly other programs, while keeping in mind the agency had not returned to the same number of passengers pre-COVID-19. More information on how the public would be informed of the analyses to be prepared by a consultant would be provided in January.

Council member Martinez-Rubin also attended the Holiday Craft Fair and she provided an example of a tote bag that Sustainability Manager Kapil Amin had created to promote sustainability and to promote the City of Pinole. She thanked everyone for making the event possible. More information on the tote bags was available through the Planning Department.

She also wished everyone a healthy and safe Thanksgiving holiday.

D. Council Requests for Future Agenda Items:

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Rafael Menis requested that the City Council schedule a future agenda item to add a proclamation recognizing Trans Day of Remembrance for 2026.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Council member Murphy requested a future agenda item in support of a local elected sign-on letter in support of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Zero Emission Appliance Standards, Regulation 9, Rules 4 and 6, to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides from residential and commercial furnaces and water heaters in buildings in the Bay Area. He asked the City Council to support the rules, and there were some flexibility and affordability measures that could be considered and he had language in that regard he could share with staff.

ACTION: Motion by Council member Murphy/Mayor Sasai, to support a local elected signon letter in support of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Zero Emission Appliance Standards, Regulation 9, Rules 4 and 6, as a future agenda item.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
E. City Manager Report / Department Staff
City Manager Kelcey Young thanked City staff who put forward the Veterans Day and Holiday Craft Fair events and the Public Work Department for cleaning up after the recent storm and setting up holiday decorations.

City Manager Young also reported as many were aware that she had offered her resignation as the City Manager. This was her last City Council meeting, and she was proud of the work she had done in Pinole. She thanked the City Council for the opportunity, the community and City staff, particularly the Executive Team. She was also overwhelmed by the outpour of support and kind words from the community and thanked everyone.

F. City Attorney Report: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED (Items 7A through 7F)
Deputy City Clerk Stone reported there were no comments from the public.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED

8. RECOGNITIONS / PRESENTATIONS / COMMUNITY EVENTS
A. Proclamations

1. Family Court Awareness Month
The City Council read into the record a proclamation recognizing the month of November as Family Court Awareness Month with the proclamation presented to Tina Holtzclaw.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Mayor Sasai reported the owner of Tina’s Place had reached out to him about the proclamation which prompted him to do some research. He thanked Tina Holtzclaw for her advocacy and learned family court was not just a place where decisions were made, but where stories of trauma and resilience happened, and for many family court was a defining experience for their stability and for their future.

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Tina Holtzclaw thanked the City Council for the recognition of Family Court Awareness Month, and emphasized the need for oversight and change in the family court system. This was the first step to achieving those goals.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
B. Presentations: None
Mayor Pro Tem Tave rearranged the meeting agenda and moved on to Item 12A. New Business at this time.

12. NEW BUSINESS:

A. Republic Services Credit Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Action:

Review and approve Republic Service MOU and credit to subscribers for work stoppage and delegate authority to City Manager to finalize terms and execute MOU (Kelcey Young)
City Manager Young reported she had not prepared a presentation for Item 12A. The City Council had copies of the Republic Services Credit Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). She highlighted the July 8 through July 21, 2025 work stoppage and service disruption to residents and service subscribers, and the City of Pinole’s issuance of a Notice of Default to Republic Services, as outlined in the November 18, 2025 staff report.

In response, Republic Services offered a credit to impacted subscribers, with the terms reflected in the MOU, as contained in Attachment A to the staff report.

City Manager Young asked the City Council to review and approve the Republic Services MOU and credit to subscribers for work stoppage and delegate authority to the City Manager to finalize terms and execute the MOU.

Responding to questions from the City Council, City Manager Young, City Attorney Eric Casher, and General Manager, Republic Services/Richmond Sanitary Service, Shawn Moberg clarified:
• The City Manager and Republic Services had multiple conversations and communications to discuss whether or not there could be a credit. The City Manager had asked a few times for a different negotiated credit, but Republic Services wanted it to be standardized with other cities. The City of San Pablo recently approved a similar MOU and the City of Richmond planned to approve a similar agreement on this date. (Toms)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

• The City Managers were in agreement that a credit was due residents and while a larger credit had been sought, the Republic Services viewpoint was that there was more to it than the week of work stoppage in that there were still some services provided during that time. The MOU was what Republic Services was comfortable proposing and the MOU had been brought to the City Council to consider whether it should move forward. (Toms) • The City’s new Franchise Agreement with Republic Services included a new Vehicle Impact Fee (VIF). Acknowledged a request for a credit for the two-week period when trash was not picked up in front of residents’ homes and VIFs had not occurred. Acknowledged a recommendation that if a motion was made to move the MOU forward, a follow up motion be considered to allow Republic Services to waive two weeks of VIF fees on future billings as opposed to a rebate process that could be a logistical nightmare. (Toms) • Described the formula used for the Residential Credit as shown on Page 157 of 178 of the agenda packet. The information was not formulated by City staff but by Republic Services.

Republic Services had determined rather than one credit for a missed pickup it would offer two credits for a missed pick-up, with the same methodology used for all services in West County. That methodology was described in detail. Republic Services hoped the MOU would be approved to allow the City Manager to execute the MOU and Republic Services to issue credits prior to December 1, 2025. (Mayor Sasai) • Confirmed the City Manager advocated for a higher credit amount, with multiple options discussed with Republic Services. There had also been discussions to include the VIF in the MOU. If the City Council wanted to pursue that option it would have to come back at a later date. (Mayor Sasai)
• Clarified how Republic Services had determined two credits would be offered to residents, which Republic Services determined would be reasonable, fair and equitable. (Mayor Sasai)
• The MOU included language that provided the credit would cover the work stoppage and the impact to residents with the defined work stoppage from July 8 to July 21, 2025. The credit and the City’s release of any claims related to the work stoppage would be limited to that period of time. For any future work stoppage or strike, the City would have the same ability to negotiate a resolution separately. (Martinez-Rubin and Mayor Pro Tem Tave)
• Clarified the process moving forward and Republic Services’ ability to ensure consistency across the board. Again, confirmed the City of San Pablo had recently and unanimously approved the same MOU and while San Pablo had also asked for additional consideration, Republic Services wanted to stay within the confines of the MOU. Clarified the City of Richmond would consider the MOU at a meeting scheduled for December 2, 2025, and all West County cities would have the same MOU. The City of Hercules was anticipated to consider the MOU at a December meeting. Republic Services also anticipated appearing before the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors before the end of the year. (Murphy)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

• Detailed how Republic Services handled the work stoppage. Republic Services recognized City Manager Young and the Public Works Department for their collaborative efforts during the work stoppage. In terms of the future, Republic Services stood by the services provided. (Murphy)
• Clarified the total commitment that Republic Services would make to the community, based on the Residential Credit (Page 157 of 178 of the agenda packet), the total resident base and multi-family dwellings with less than five units, with the total refund to the community estimated at $69,000. (Mayor Pro Tem Tave)

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Irma Ruport understood Republic Services would provide $69,000 in credit to residents. She referred to the service called Neighborhood Dumpster Days that used to be provided to residents, although that had been stopped since they had not been monitored well in the neighborhoods.

She requested that Dumpster Days be included in the contract with Republic Services on a trial basis for one year to see how it goes. She noted many residents did not take advantage of the twice a year, 15-free bag pick-up and could use that service along with Dumpster Days, particularly for seniors who did not have the ability to bring in some of the larger items.

Rafael Menis referenced the Residential Credit as shown on Page 157 of 178 of the agenda packet, and explained he had calculated that for the $2.68 franchise fee multiplied by the 848 total subscribers split across the various different categories, and calculated there would be an additional refund of $15,672.64. The IRRF surcharge was more complicated since it varied by subscriber type, and he had not completed the calculation for that one. Given that Republic Services’ trucks were not for the most part undertaking the activity that triggered the franchise fee and were not on the street causing the strain generating the nexus for the fees, he asked who would be responsible to repay the franchise fee. If the responsible party to provide that refund was the City of Pinole, he asked from what source that refund would be paid.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
Council member Martinez-Rubin noted that many of the comments during the work stoppage were not always positive, although when she requested a bulk pickup it had been deferred with the fee waived. She found that the right thing to do and recognized those kinds of circumstances were not always public knowledge. She relayed another situation where a small garbage bin had been lost during pickup and she received a replacement the next day. She appreciated that level of service and thanked Republic Services.

ACTION: Motion by Council members Toms/Martinez-Rubin to approve the Republic Services MOU and credit to subscribers for work stoppage and delegate authority to the City Manager to finalize terms and execute the MOU.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Council member Toms offered a motion that the City Council direct the City Manager or designee to work with Republic Services on crediting the VIF for an additional two-week period on future bills.

Council member Martinez-Rubin understood rather than a reimbursement, there would be no charge or levy for the VIF for a period of time, although Council member Toms explained she had a conversation with Mr. Moberg about the best way to approach that idea, and he suggested that not billing for a future cycle was much cleaner than rebating a past bill.

Council member Martinez-Rubin understood cleaner meant administratively less effort required.

Council member Toms repeated the motion, seconded by Council member Martinez-Rubin to direct the City Manager or designee to work with Republic Services on waiving the charge equal to two-weeks’ worth of VIFs for customers.

On the motion, Council member Murphy commented based on the current conversation that the goal was for residents to avoid some of the extra costs during the time of the service failure and help to restore trust and goodwill. He wanted to ensure in terms of process how this would come back. If the motion was approved, he asked the City Manager or staff to speak to next steps.

City Manager Young suggested it would make sense to come back to the City Council so that when and if the motion passed, staff would work with Republic Services to come up with exactly how much of a credit or a reduction in the VIF would look like moving forward in December or early January, and that way it could be showcased and be transparent.

Council member Murphy wanted to ensure that residents saw immediate and visible benefit. He recognized the MOU approval was the best way to do that. He wanted to ensure the City was focused on ensuring residents actually understood the benefits, whether a rebate or a credit. He understood the form of another MOU would come to the City Council at a future date City Manager Young was uncertain it would require a full MOU but some sort of way to memorialize or formalize this process would be required.

ACTION: Motion by Council members Toms/Martinez-Rubin to direct the City Manager or designee to work with Republic Services on waiving the charge equal to two-weeks’ worth of Vehicle Impact Fees for customers.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
City Clerk Bell-Spears announced for the benefit of the public that the City Council would proceed with Item 12B, to be followed by Item 11A and thereafter the Consent Calendar.

B. Approve a Memorial Renaming Bayfront Park and Sign Installation in Honor of Ohlone. Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Fiona Epps)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Communications Director Fiona Epps provided a PowerPoint presentation on the approval of a Memorial Renaming Bayfront Park in Honor of the Ohlone, which included an overview of the request from the Pinole Valley High School (PVHS) Native American Student Union (NASU), recommending approval of a memorial renaming Bayfront Park in honor of the Ohlone; City Memorial Policy approved in 2020; background of the request from PVHS NASU to the Committee on Memorials and the renaming of Bayfront Park to Rookǒs Park, the traditional name for tule in the Chochenyo language. Tule was found in abundance on Pinole shores and had cultural significance and environmental importance. She also highlighted the youth efforts to rename Bayfront Park with photographs provided by the faculty lead from the PVHS NASU and the Forensic Speech & Debate Club.

The renaming of the park was intended to honor the Ohlone heritage, educate the community, uplift student led equity efforts reinforcing ongoing City and West Contra Costa Unified School District (WCCUSD) Indigenous recognition.

The park signage and interpretative board was also detailed, with the existing wooden entry sign in good condition and with a new panel to be added. High density urethane was recommended for durability and aesthetics and weatherproofing the interpretative board was recommended to explain the cultural significance of tule with the designs to follow the City branding and park signage standards. If approved, staff would proceed to select a vendor that met the City’s criteria for quality aesthetics and costs. The envisioned dedication activities would include the Tribal Partners vision for string making, abalone bead crafting, tule boat building and launching, and tribe elders and student advocates would speak during the unveiling of the new sign.

In terms of implementation and coordination, the vendor chosen would provide design, fabrication and installation services for the new park signage. City staff was prepared to support installation and event, and update regional mapping services (Google Maps, GIS, etc.) and implementation was anticipated with minimal disruption. It was also noted there was broad community support for the request from NASU, the Forensic Speech & Debate Club, African American Student Union (AASU), IndoPak Student Union, American Sign Language (ASL) Program, along with teachers, staff and community members.

The estimated signage costs depended on the type of materials and would range from $11,000 to $17,000, with funding to be reallocated from the Measure S 2014 Park Operations Budget.

There would be no new fiscal impact associated with the approval.

Communications Director Epps asked the City Council to adopt a resolution approving the application for naming and dedication of City Facilities to rename Bayfront Park in honor of the Ohlone and install a memorial sign. Council approval would authorize staff to rename Bayfront Park to “Rookǒs Park,” procure signage reflecting the new park name and educational interpretation, reallocating Measure S funds from parks operations and coordinate an unveiling and dedication ceremony event in partnership with the PVHS NASU and Forensic Speech & Debate Club and Tribal Members of the Nations of Lisjan.

Communications Director Epps, Community Services Director Andrea Dwyer and Finance Director Markisha Guillory responded to questions from the City Council:

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

• Acknowledged appreciation for the work of PVHS NASU, Lead Michele Lamons-Raiford and others for their work on this request. If approved, the branding standards would be merged with the Community Services Department park signage standards. (Mayor Sasai) • Again acknowledged recognition of the work of the PVHS NASU and Ms. Lamons-Raiford for the work on the request which involved a two-year effort. Clarified Measure S 2014 Parks Operation Budget funds were allocated for park usage. The funds had not been specifically allocated to a specific project. The funds were available in a recreation budget, but allocated for other improvements that had been earmarked. The proposed appropriation of funds would be removed from those improvements/services and allocated to the replacement of the Bayfront Park sign. (Murphy)
• Staff would be looking at City signage throughout the City of Pinole in the near future, since many signs required replacement. Again, clarified the proposed use of Measure S 2014 Parks Operation Budget funds, reiterated funds had not been assigned to one specific project, but as projects arose. As an example, the holiday tree lighting was over budget given expenditure increases due to safety protocols. As a result, some of the Measure S 2014 Parks Operation Budget funds would be utilized. (Murphy) • Confirmed design guidelines for City parks had been established when the City’s branding guidelines had been established. The Community Services Department would utilize this process when moving forward, and once staff proceeded with new signs, those signs would come before the City Council. Acknowledged the City’s new branding and logo guidelines were to be utilized throughout the entire City for consistency and clarity.

Acknowledged a request to ensure the project aligned with the beautiful, strategic and thoughtfully adopted branding guidelines for the City. Staff emphasized the fonts and styles of the proposed signage would be in alignment with the current City branding guidelines to ensure consistency with outdoor signage in City parks. (Murphy) • Acknowledged concerns with needed repairs to the skatepark ramp. Confirmed the skatepark ramp had not been repaired, funding for repair had not been allocated, the project was not ready to be reviewed and had not been included in the current list of projects. Reiterated the dollars in the Measure S 2014 Parks Operation budget were for parks projects. Staff was currently using all resources to maintain City fields between now and February 2026, and had not yet allocated the time needed for repairs for each City park but had identified some areas that needed additional wood chips, as an example. In those instances, the cost of materials had been pulled from Measure S 2014 funds. (Martinez-Rubin)
• As to what allowed staff to bring the proposed renaming of Bayfront Park to fruition now rather than other matters on the books that could be related to safety concerns, staff clarified when a memorial application was received there was no defined timeline. In this case, the proposed renaming was a two-year effort. PVHS NASU advocated for the project and submitted an application after coordinating with the Tribal Members on their ideas for the renaming of the park. The City Manager was charged with reviewing the application and determining whether it should move forward to City departments and the Memorials Committee for recommendations on next steps, and determine whether there were other stakeholders or whether other information was needed. (Martinez-Rubin)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

• This application came to fruition over the summer with the application submitted in June 2025. There had been consultation between staff and the Public Works and Community Services Departments, which provided input on the signage and installation. Since the installation of the signs would be by the vendor, the Public Works Department did not need to install and that cost would be covered in the cost for the vendor. PVHS NASU expressed no specific timeline they just wanted to see the application move forward at some point. Again, clarified the fiscal impact, funding source and staff desire to be as transparent as possible to inform the City Council where the funds for the project would come from. (Martinez-Rubin)
• Staff clarified in the 2023 timeline there had been City Council support for the renaming process. When that started, this request supplemented that effort and staff understood this application was to move forward to the City Council. Staff again clarified the use of Measure S 2014 Parks Operation Budget funds and acknowledged the use of funds from another City Department had been discussed, but the proposal fit into the use of Measure 2014 Parks Operation Budget funds. (Martinez-Rubin)
• Staff had not received any offers for funding from stakeholders, PVHS NASU or others to offset the cost of the project. Tribal Members had offered to play a large role in the dedication event but there remained details to be finalized with the stakeholders with respect to costs for the event. Based on the description of the dedication event, which had been provided by the stakeholders, it was described as a smaller expense allowing the City to pay the cost. Staff added there were some special departmental expenses in the City Manager’s budget that could support some of the smaller costs associated with the dedication event. (Martinez-Rubin)
• The Memorials Committee discussed the Memorial Policy approved in 2020. Staff confirmed there had been some applications for memorials, which included an offer to donate an entire structure or labor costs. As an example, there was an application request to approve and install a redwood plaque in Pinole Valley Park as a memorial at no cost to the City. In this case, the applicant had not offered to pay for the signage or the renaming of Bayfront Park. It was up to staff to try to find funding for the request. Staff had discussed updating the Memorial Policy and adding a budget in the next fiscal year to offset costs, but it was challenging given the unknown of what could be requested. (Martinez-Rubin) • Acknowledged a request for staff to go back to the different groups involved and request the involvement of the youth, any other community members and Tribal Members, to enhance the goals to have an intergenerational one-time dedication. The intent was also to foster improved relationships in the City between the tribes and people who were not of the tribes, and foster an intercultural exchange throughout the year, with other organizations in Pinole and non-profits who would like a relationship with those groups, such as the Pinole Historical Society and Pinole Artisans. Acknowledged a request that staff facilitate those intercultural exchanges. (Martinez-Rubin) • Five memorial request applications had been received in 2025, with two to five applications received per year on average during the Communications Director’s tenure with the City. If so directed, staff could return with a memorial budget and prepare that information for FY 2026/27 and submit it for review. (Mayor Pro Tem Tave)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Irma Ruport thanked the Communications Director for all of the work and the community support for PVHS NASU to get involved, which was nice to see. She hoped there would be more involvement from students in the future. She strongly recommended the City Council support the name change, and commented on the history and heritage in Pinole. She wanted to see the City appropriately define all roles, ensure everyone was included, and invite the students to come back and offer their support. She also recommended the involvement of more youth in City government since youth were the future.

Rafael Menis supported the proposed rename change of Bayfront Park to Rookǒs Park, which was a good way to signal the connection to the past and build more connections with the tribes as the City had been trying to do through its Environmental Justice Element and various polices it had been working towards over the past several years. He recognized the desire to maintain a connection to the history of the site and asked whether it would be possible to have a segment, a bench, or some sort of sub-memorial recognizing Peter Murray and Jack Meehan, to acknowledge their work building up the site.

Mr. Menis added it was not necessarily reasonable to expect every applicant submitting a memorial request to the City to provide the same level of support since some applicants may have the time and/or material resources while others may not. The City could choose to have that be a factor in the Memorials Committee assessment process, but that should not be a decisive factor since the City wanted to encourage student bodies and others who may not have the resources to advocate for ways they want to see things memorialized and implemented in the community.

He recognized the efforts of the student groups at PVHS who had gone out of their way to advocate for this request, attend City Council meetings and work to make this request happen.

As a matter of public policy, the City should encourage and seek to see more such efforts Anthony Vossbrink asked on behalf of himself and others who patronized City parks whether other financial avenues had been explored for Bayfront Park, the dog park or Pinole Valley Park, such as a partial grant that could help offset the costs of the sign program/memorial. He understood there were other things the City could do to dress up the park in line with requests for hardened security, which many members of the community had requested given the onset of criminal activity. In particular, a resident lost her life on the park trial near the RV storage lot near the railroad tracks along the creek. He asked the City Council to consider adding lighting in the parking lot and improve security on the outer rim or center of the park. After 7:00 p.m., the area was dark but people continued to use the park. He suggested solar lights could be installed in the parking lot. He also asked about the City’s signage standards since the dog park and other parks had outdated signage with old telephone numbers, which residents had asked for years to be updated. He suggested new lights would not impact any wildlife within the proximity of parks.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
Council member Martinez-Rubin asked whether it was feasible to have the new name Rookǒs Park and in parenthesis Bayfront Park. She agreed with the need to honor the original inhabitants of the area, the culture and ancestry while at the same time memorializing the initial history of Bayfront Park. Having lived in multi-cultural settings, it was not one or the other, there were representatives of different groups, be they primary language or cultural.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Council member Martinez-Rubin commented that Bayfront Park was almost generic and encompassed many groups. The new name could be highlighted with possibly a larger font and in a color that stood out. She suggested design-wise both elements could be part of the sign.

Communications Director Epps suggested that could be incorporated into the interpretative board, a good place to include that information.

Mayor Sasai thanked Council member Martinez-Rubin for her comments, her suggestion and viewpoint. He explained when the application had been submitted by PVHS NASU and Ms.

Lamons-Raiford, they had been pushing to rename Bayfront Park to Bayfront-Ohlone Park, but in consultation with the Ohlone leaders, including Corrina Gould, with the Sogorea Te ’Land Trust, they went a totally different direction and emphasized the name should be Rookǒs Park given the vegetation present in the area of the park. He loved the name Bayfront Park and wrestled with the request, but the stakeholder input was incredibly valuable and renaming Bayfront Park was the least the City could do given the history of the Ohlone and their presence in Pinole. While he would love to combine the names, he would like to honor and lean on the Ohlone experience and lived experiences to move the request forward.

Mayor Sasai liked the Communications Director’s suggestion to somehow explain the history of Bayfront Park in the interpretative interactive board to educate the public of the history of the park past and present. He thanked Communications Director Epps for her thoughtful engagement with community partners about the process and what went into the recommendation. He was concerned there were no final designs to review at this time, as well as no design standards for park signage, but would like to move the item forward.

Mayor Sasai offered a motion to approve the staff recommendations to rename Bayfront Park in honor of the Ohlone and install a memorial sign. He explained that Council approval would authorize staff to: rename Bayfront Park to “Rookǒs Park”, procure signage reflecting the new park name and educational interpretation, reallocating Measure S funds from parks operations and coordinate an unveiling and dedication ceremony event in partnership with the PVHS NASU and Forensic Speech & Debate Club, and Tribal Members of the Nations of Lisjan, contingent upon review by the Memorials Subcommittee and approval of the final signage and interpretative board in compliance with the City’s signage guidelines.

Council member Murphy seconded the motion.

On the motion, Council member Martinez-Rubin appreciated the staff suggestion about including some of the name history on the interpretative board, although that had not specifically been included in the motion. She asked if that direction should be included in the motion.

Mayor Sasai as the maker of the motion and Council member Murphy as the second, accepted the amendment to the motion to include the history of the name Bayfront Park on some part of the interpretative board.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

ACTION: Motion by Mayor Sasai/Council member Murphy to adopt a resolution approving the application for naming and dedication of City Facilities to rename Bayfront Park in honor of the Ohlone and install a memorial sign. Council approval would authorize staff to rename Bayfront Park to “Rookǒs Park,” procure signage reflecting the new park name and educational interpretation, reallocating Measure S funds from parks operations and coordinate an unveiling and dedication ceremony event in partnership with the PVHS NASU and Forensic Speech & Debate Club, and Tribal Members of the Nations of Lisjan, contingent upon review by the Memorials Subcommittee and approval of the final signage and interpretative board in compliance with the City’s signage guidelines, along with the inclusion of the history of the name Bayfront Park on some part of the interpretative board.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None
The City Council moved to consider Item 11A. Old Business at this time.

11. OLD BUSINESS:

A. Update on Implementation of the Residential Health and Safety Rental Inspection Ordinance (Pinole Municipal Code Chapter 8.30) and Adoption of Administrative Regulations. Action: Adopt Resolution per Staff Recommendation (Jared Murti, Housing Fellow, Lilly Whalen)
Community Development Director Lilly Whalen introduced Housing Fellow Jared Murti, Partnership for the Bay’s Future (PBF), who provided a PowerPoint presentation and update on the Implementation of the Residential Health and Safety Rental Inspection Ordinance (Pinole Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 8.30), which included an overview of site development and data transfer and research and community input; Council input around decarbonization in terms of tracking efficiency upgrades, connecting operators to existing resources and partnering with the Climate Action Plan (CAP) monitoring; Council input around tenant data, and engagement with municipal operators, tenant advocates and community input; highlights of the proposed administrative regulations; temporary transition schedule for 2026/27 implementation (categorybased compliance regulations), next steps and implementation timeline. Administrative regulations proposed in January 2026, were also highlighted.

Responding to questions from the City Council, Community Development Director Whalen and Housing Fellow Murti clarified:
• Staff would have to review the City’s Housing Element to determine whether it included a specific policy requiring this program but there were policies with respect to the inspection of the rental housing stock and it could be tied to programs in the CAP. (Toms) • As to whether fees would cover the cost of the inspector, staff had done some “back of the envelope costing” and evaluation of the fees that may support full cost recovery, with the opportunity staff was working on now with a new user fee setting. (Toms)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

• Staff would dive in first with this issue and in tandem look at a class comp study for a new position and make sure the fees from the User Fee Study supported that position. Staff hoped to bring back the fees and the position at the same time at a future date. (Toms) • The current system used by the City began only a few years ago and that system was described in detail. When a property owner needed to renew the Certificate of Occupancy (COO), the first step would be the eTrack portal to renew their business license and then apply for a new COO on a Microsoft form developed by staff. Thereafter, they would have to go to a link to pay the fees and then book the actual inspection using Microsoft Bookings. This process involved three different systems reconciled by staff when the actual inspection was performed. If corrections were needed from the inspection, the property owner would receive a hard copy inspection checklist and would have to apply for a building permit through the eTrack system and then schedule a second follow-up inspection prior to receiving the COO, which would be manually generated in the City offices using Microsoft Word. All of those functions could be performed under the new Tolemi software platform. (Murphy)
• In terms of implementation, confirmed the new Tolemi platform would follow a City trend of moving away from paper. Staff would conduct office hours to provide dedicated support in-person for those who may have varying technical literacy levels. Based on input from other municipalities, Tolemi had excellent customer service for both city staff and enrollees. Staff also had success with the Community Development Department kiosk counter, which assisted people not as familiar with online systems. Staff was confident they could continue to navigate the kiosk while implementing the new system. (Murphy) • As to the degree to which the City could be transparent with data, currently with respect to demographic data and fair housing laws, staff understood the City was in compliance.

In January when staff returned with more information on the regulation pieces and after consultation with the City Attorney, staff should have more information on the compliance requirements. (Murphy)
• Acknowledged appreciation for the staff work on the program for a more modern and transparent forceful system protecting tenants and responsible property owners. (Mayor Sasai)
• As to how staff could maximize enrollment and minimize tenant non-compliance, clarified that maximizing enrollment would be through engagement with the software platform identifying suspected rental properties and creating mailers and other ways to identify and engage with non-compliant units. The ease of use of the new platform as a one-stopshop, was something based on input from other municipalities, key to getting people onboard. When the program officially relaunched, engagement with the Realtor® community would also be key, which piece was currently missing. Ensuring Realtors® were educated about this program was a requirement for those renting out their homes. (Martinez-Rubin) • Staff also would like to include an incentive piece, to enroll early and not miss the deadline, and while what that could look like was not currently known it could involve waiver of the first-time enrollment fee. In addition, staff was considering a self-certification option which may incentivize people to enroll in the program. (Martinez-Rubin)

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

• Acknowledged a request for the program and its resources to be a resource for renters.

Clarified staff could bring something back in January and there were some municipalities that had the same software provider staff could reference. The program could provide information on rental pricing, utility costs, code violation complaints and the like and was helpful for a renter to make informed decisions and also provide transparency. Another benefit of the revamped program would be the resources the City would put into the staffing as well, with the staff person to serve as the first person in line to go out in the event of substandard housing complaints from the community, currently handled by the City’s Code Enforcement Officer. Additionally, the platform itself would eventually help the City understand more about the housing stock which could help drive additional policies in the future that would help renters and tenants. (Martinez-Rubin)

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
Rafael Menis appreciated Council member Martinez-Rubin’s questions, but as a renter himself he was unsure how accessible the platform would be to renters since it was primarily designed for the benefit of the City first and property owners secondarily. He asked how a renter would know the platform existed, whether it would be highlighted on the City website, and whether there would be a requirement to have links to the platform in any advertisements of the rental property.

He also asked how would it work with First Amendment issues, and more broadly, if people were reporting things through the platform, whether reports would be made anonymously or whether names would be attached to them. He was concerned since there was a power imbalance between renters and their landlords, often substantially, and a tenant may be unwilling to say or bring up a concern with the household for fear of retaliation, whether or not retaliation was legal.

Mr. Menis commented the reality of the power relationship itself made filing a complaint a dangerous act, especially if it could be tracked back to the individual filing the complaint. If the City wanted the platform to be a resource to benefit renters and used for complaints and the like, he asked how the City planned to mitigate the fundamental power dynamic between renter and landlord in a way that offered renters rights without disrupting the relationship between renter and landlord. He asked that the City try to address this concern when thinking about questions.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
Mayor Pro Tem Tave asked if someone was living in a substandard residence whether they would have to wait for the inspection to be done to avoid any disruption to the relationship between the renter and the landlord, which could put them at a disadvantage for a certain amount of time. He recognized some people were currently living in a landlord/renter relationship and in a building that was substandard but the rent was low, and they were balancing the living conditions with livability. He was curious how the City could prevent the landlord from passing the costs for upgrades to the renter, something he hoped would be addressed at some point.

Housing Fellow Murti explained the City had a complaint-based inspection model that was available in addition to the triannual inspection, and as complaints arose the tenant’s comfort in reporting that complaint was something that was still being hashed out. As staff launched the program and when sending the enrollment reports to tenants, that would create a connection point that did not currently exist and would be a step towards providing tenants an avenue to report, and whether there could be anonymous reporting was something staff wanted to build out.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Community Development Director Whalen added the public comments brought up good points and something staff would be thinking about over the next couple of months. She noted that substandard housing laws required the City to inspect, in multi-family housing for instance, not just where the complaint originated but all adjacent units. There were also times when people in the same complex would send staff complaints about a different unit in an attempt to preserve anonymity for others who lived in the building.

Mayor Pro Tem Tave understood that issue was something staff would have to think about.

Council member Martinez-Rubin suggested being presented with an option for a voluntary action, and improve housing overall to inform and educate the public and normalize what was healthy and adequate housing, should start with the possibility that someone could inform a third party about substandard housing. She recognized the concern with the power dynamics, and suggested it could be done in an appropriate way if the information was made available and believed to be helpful. She understood that staff would put more thought into that subject.

Council member Murphy found the program to be incredibly important to the City. A program like this increased the focus on public health and safety, and created a fair and consistent system that supported neighborhoods. He reported this type of program had been brought to his attention by a local Realtor® who characterized the City as “leaving money on the table” and that the City should be focused more on residential health and rental inspection. He emphasized the importance of the opportunity for the City to have a goal of supporting neighborhoods and address some historical problems with the City’s own compliance monitoring.

Council member Murphy commented in terms of the cost recovery model that he wanted to ensure being able to achieve full cost recovery and he had questions about the fee study. His main concern was to avoid having the program be subsidized by the General Fund in the long term.

He wanted to ensure that staff had an understanding of the scope of the fee study and that it include labor costs, licensing, platform costs, overhead and indirect costs from the City Attorney.

Council member Murphy also wanted to understand the difference in the contingency for enforcement, between code enforcement and the inspector and any idea for future staff. He wanted to note those as opportunities to dig into and suggested a practical, comprehensive and inclusive fee study would be very important. This program was important to him, residents, Realtors® and community members he had spoken to, and the program would be more important if it met the cost recovery model.

ACTION: Motion by Council members Toms/Martinez-Rubin to adopt a resolution approving the administrative regulations implementing Pinole Municipal Code Chapter

8.30 following the public hearing and direct staff to prepare a Class and Compensation Study for a full-time Residential Health and Safety Inspector, and conduct a fee study to support full cost recovery and return with recommended fee adjustments.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

The City Council returned to Item 9 and the remainder of the agenda.

9. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and noncontroversial. These items will be enacted by one motion and without discussion. If, however, any interested party or Council member(s) wishes to comment on an item, they may do so before action is taken on the Consent Calendar. Following comments, if a Council member wishes to discuss an item, it will be removed from the Consent Calendar and taken up in order after adoption of the Consent Calendar.

A. Approve the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting on November 4, 2025.

B. Receive the November 1, 2025 – November 14, 2025, List of Warrants in the Amount of $1,091,413.46 and the November 7, 2025 Payroll in the Amount of $554,858.64.

C. Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 First Quarter Financial Report. Action: Receive a Report (Markisha Guillory)
D. Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 First Quarter Investment Report. Action: Receive a Report (Markisha Guillory)
E. Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 1st Quarter Strategic Plan Status Report. Action:

Receive a Report (Kelcey Young)
F. Receive Update on Capital Projects, Inspection and Permitting and Maintenance.

Action: Receive Report (Heba El-Guindy)

PUBLIC COMMENTS OPENED
City Clerk Bell-Spears reported there were no comments from the public.

PUBLIC COMMENTS CLOSED
ACTION: Motion by Council members Toms/Martinez-Rubin to approve Consent Calendar Items A through F, as shown.

Vote: Passed 5-0
Ayes: Sasai, Tave, Martinez-Rubin, Murphy, Toms
Noes: None
Abstain: None

Absent: None

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None

13. CITIZENS TO BE HEARD (Continued from Item 6) (Public Comments) Only open to members of the public who did not speak under the first Citizens to be Heard, Agenda Item 6.

Pinole City Council Regular Meeting
Minutes – November 18, 2025

Citizens may speak under any item not listed on the Agenda. The time limit is 3 minutes and is subject to modification by the Mayor. Individuals may not share or offer time to another speaker.

Pursuant to provisions of the Brown Act, no action may be taken on a matter unless it is listed on the agenda, or unless certain emergency or special circumstances exist. The City Council may direct staff to investigate and/or schedule certain matters for consideration at a future Council meeting.

City Clerk Bell-Spears reported there were no comments from the public.

Mayor Pro Tem Tave wished his brother and sister Mark and Laura Tave a Happy Birthday on November 25, 2025, with both turning 44.

Mayor Sasai asked that the meeting adjourn in memory of Pinole resident, Joanna Pallock, who he had the honor of meeting when he served on the West Contra Costa Transportation Commission (WCCTC). Ms. Pallock served as the Project Manager for WCCTC for six years, was beloved by WCCTC staff, served on the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CBPAC), and was instrumental in the planning and development of the WCCTC Senior/Disabled Needs Assessment Study and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan. He offered his condolences to the Pallock Family and requested the meeting adjourn in Joanna Pallock’s memory.

14. ADJOURN to the Regular City Council Meeting of December 2, 2025 in Remembrance of Amber Swartz and Joanna Pallock.

At 9:58 p.m., Mayor Pro Tem Tave adjourned to a Regular City Council Meeting on December 2, 2025 in Remembrance of Amber Swartz and Joanna Pallock.

Submitted by:
_________________________________
Heather Bell-Spears CMC
City Clerk
Approved by City Council:

CITY COUNCIL
REPORT 9.C.

DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2025
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Lilly Whalen, Community Development Director, 510-724-9832, [email protected]
Kapil Amin, Sustainability Project Manager, N/A, [email protected] SUBJECT: APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR AND/OR EXECUTION OF GRANT FUNDS UP TO $736,370 FROM THE OCEAN PROTECTION COUNCIL
(OPC) FOR THE PINOLE-HERCULES MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL SHORELINE

ADAPTATION PLAN

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution which will approve the application for and/or execution of grant funds from the Ocean Protection Council to complete the project "Pinole-Hercules Multi-jurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan".

BACKGROUND
In August 2024, City Council adopted Pinole’s inaugural Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), establishing a pathway to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 in alignment with Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 1279. Given Pinole is a shoreline community, a key strategy in the CAAP is sea level rise adaption. Modeling tools such as the Surging Seas Risk Finder and NOAA Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Viewer show significant risk to critical infrastructure and facilities, including Bayfront Park, Pinole High School, the Pinole Library, and the shared Pinole-Hercules Water Pollution Control Plant. CAAP actions to mitigate the impacts of sea level rise include:
• SLR-1a Conduct a shoreline stabilization study to determine the most effective methods for protecting Pinole’s shoreline communities and infrastructure from erosion and sea level rise, and to identify opportunities for restoring natural coastal habitats that can serve as a buffer against storm surges and other impacts of climate change. • SLR-1b In collaboration with Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development and state agencies, develop a sea level rise resilience and adaptation strategy with shoreline restoration projects using innovative nature-based solutions and green engineering that would enhance public access, shoreline habitat (e.g., reestablishing native dune habitats, wetlands, and lagoons) and increase shoreline recreational opportunities.
• SLR-1c Partner with the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and/or similar entities, regarding regional approaches, strategies, and mitigation actions to address sea level rise. Implement a Shoreline Management Plan, and/or a Shoreline Monitoring Program that would identify erosional hotspots and

timely response.

In 2021, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill 1, directing the State to provide funding to local and regional governments to develop sea level rise adaption plans and implementation projects. In 2023, the Governor approved SB 272 which requires local governments within the coastal zone to develop a sea level rise plan—subject to BCDC requirements and approval— by January 1, 2034. The City enlisted no-cost technical assistance from the Ocean Protection Council (OPC) to submit a proposal for a shoreline adaptation plan. OPC approves proposals on a rolling, non-competitive basis but as funding dwindles, proposals must meet additional standards, including demonstrating cross-jurisdictional collaboration to ensure responsible use of State funds. To support this requirement, the City of Pinole invited the City of Hercules to serve as a co-applicant, given the vulnerability of the shared treatment plant. Hercules agreed, and staff worked closely with OPC technical assistance providers and community partners to develop a successful proposal.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
This grant award will provide funding for an existing conditions assessment, vulnerability assessment, adaptation plan, as well as community engagement and tribal consultation throughout the entire process for the Pinole-Hercules shoreline. Table 1 below provides a summary of the various task items:

Table 1: Summary of Task Items
Task Description
Existing
Conditions
Assessment
• Identify relevant plans, policies, studies
• Map physical and ecological conditions
• Map existing populations, assess/services and land uses Vulnerability
Assessment • Map and describe the exposure of people, assets, ecosystems and services to coastal flood hazards for different scenarios • Consider cascading hazards such as power outagees
• Assess broader impacts to interconnected infrastructure Adaptation Plan
• Develop local vision and goals
• Develop adaptation strategy alternatives
• Develop evaluation criteria of adaptation strategies
• Develop conceptual plans and descriptions
• Develop implementation plan and priority project list Community
Engagement • Develop community engagement plan
• Engage community during the development of existing conditions, vulnerability assessment and adaptation plan through a variety of engagement methods:
o Community workshops

o Storymapping and digital mapping
o Senior citizen focus groups
o Technical Advisory Committee
o Tribal Consultation
o Surveys
o Pop-ups
o and more
Originally, the City’s proposed scope of work included a Task for Data Collection and Citizen Engagement to gather new, site-specific qualitative visual data to directly inform the Vulnerability Assessment and guide development of a responsive Shoreline Adaptation Plan.

This effort would have implemented two complementary approaches: fixed-point photomonitoring using CoastSnap (or a similar cradle-based system), and community-based documentation of flooding during king tide and storm events. As a companion effort, the City planned to collaborate with community partners and the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) to design and lead public king tide photo-collection events to broaden participation and ensure representation from populations most affected by flooding. OPC ultimately removed this proposed Task 2 from the approved scope because it did not fit squarely within their funding criteria. As reflected in the redlines in Attachment B, the proposal has been revised accordingly, reducing the funding request from $894,750.91 to the approved amount of $736,370. Staff has communicated the importance of this component to OPC and is actively pursuing alternative funding, including a recent application to the Rose Foundation and an upcoming application to the Whale Tail Grant from the California Coastal Commission.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adopting the Resolution in Attachment A will result in a positive fiscal impact of up to $736,370 in grant funding from OPC. This award complements the SB 1 funds previously awarded to Contra Costa County and passed through to the Cities of Pinole and Hercules via an MOU, totaling approximately $40,650 to support staff time for community visioning and engagement.

In total, the project will receive $777,020 in grant funds. These funds will support development of a sea level rise plan—subject to BCDC requirements and approval—by January 1, 2034, as required under SB 272.

Of the total grant funding, approximately 25% (about $185,000) is allocated to staff time, with roughly 30% of that amount supporting Hercules staff and the remaining 70% supporting Pinole staff, including staff from Community Development and Public Works, who will lead the project. The balance of the funding—approximately $540,000 (70%)—is allocated to consultant services, including the Vulnerability Assessment ($170,000), Shoreline Adaptation Plan ($250,000), and community engagement support ($120,000). Compensation for community partners is budgeted at 5% of the grant funds, with equipment and materials representing an additional 2%. No matching funds are required.

It should be noted that the City is required to use the OPC-provided template provided in Attachment C, and the resolution language must remain exactly as written – no changes are allowed.

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
B. Pinole Hercules Proposal
C. Governing Board Resolution Template

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF PINOLE APPROVING THE APPLICATION

FOR AND/OR EXECUTION OF GRANT FUNDS FROM THE OCEAN PROTECTION COUNCIL

UNDER THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY, FLOOD CONTROL, RIVER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2006 (Proposition 84), Prop 68,

ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSE PLATE FUNDS, ONCE THROUGH COOLING, GREENHOUSE

GAS REDUCTION FUND, OR GENERAL FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above; and
WHEREAS, the California Natural Resources Agency has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Natural Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval by the potential grantee’s governing board either before submission of said application(s) to the State or prior to execution of the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant/Grantee, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the project
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of Pinole

1. If applicable, approves the filing of an application for the Pinole-Hercules MultiJurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan to be funded by grant funds from the Ocean Protection Council

2. If applicable, certifies that Applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s) consistent with the land tenure requirements; or will secure the resources to do so;

3. Certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), legal requirements for building codes, health and safety codes, the California Labor Code, disabled access laws, and, that prior to commencement of the project, all applicable permits will have been obtained; and,

4. Certifies that the Applicant/Grantee will work towards the State Planning Priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety as included in Government Code Section 65041.1, and,

5. Appoints the City Manager, or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project(s).

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pinole held on the 2nd day of December 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was regularly introduced, passed, and adopted on this December 2, 2025.

Heather Bell-Spears, CMC
City Clerk

OPC SB 1 Grant Program
Track 1: SLR Adaptation Planning - Full Proposal
a. Section 1: Cover Page
Contact Information
Lead Entity Name City of Pinole
Contact Person Kapil Amin
Position/Title Sustainability Project Manager
Phone (510) 372- 0989 Email [email protected]
Mailing Address 2131 Pear St. Pinole, CA 94564
Federal Tax ID# 94-6000394
Subcontractor Information (if applicable)
Subcontractor 1 Name: City of Hercules (neighboring jurisdiction) Contact Person: Timothy Rood & Seana Field
Position/Title: Community Development Director & Senior Planner Phone & Email: [email protected] & [email protected] Mailing Address: 111 Civic Drive Hercules, CA 94547
Federal Tax ID #: 94-6027345
Brief Description of their role in the project: Request for Proposals (RFP) development, proposals review and scoring, draft and final documents review, meetings with consultants community and stakeholder feedback solicitation
Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): Yes Subcontractor 2 Name: Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Plan Consultant (TBD after RFP process)
Contact Person:

Position/Title:

Phone & Email:

Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

2 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Brief Description of their role in the project: The selected consultant will develop both the VA and Adaptation Plan to improve efficiency and coordination between both documents. The consultant will meet all requirements set in the Project Team’s RFP to carry out the VA and Adaptation Plan to OPC and BCDC standards.

Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): No Subcontractor 3 Name: San Francisco Estuary Institute D Contact Person: Alex Braud; Jeremy Lowe
Position/Title: Environmental Scientist/GIS Specialist; Senior Environmental Scientist Phone & Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: For Task 1, SFEI will prepare section B2 of the Existing Conditions Assessment. For Task 2, SFEI will lead data collection efforts by a photomonitoring cradle, ground-truthing flood photo system, citizen science engagement and data integration for the VA. SFEI will also serve on the Technical Advisory Committee and take on an advisory role for community engagement led by the VA/AP consultant.

Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): No Subcontractor 4 Name: Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed Contact Person: Ann Moriarty
Position/Title: Board of Directors
Phone & Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: FOPCW will assist with Task 2 data collection under lead partner’s direction as well as rallying community efforts for identification of additional erosional hotspots
Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): Yes Subcontractor 5 Name: Pinole Rotary Club
Contact Person: Ivette Ricco
Position/Title: President
Phone & Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: Pinole Rotary Club will assist with completing Task 4 community engagement subtasks to inform the VA and SAP in the form of pop-ups, workshops, survey distribution, etc. with direction for the VA/SAP consultant Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): Yes Subcontractor 6 Name: Pinole Valley High School Earth Team Contact Person: Noah Slager
Position/Title: Program Director
Phone & Email: [email protected]

3 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: Pinole Valley High School Earth Team campus coordinator and interns will assist with and lead citizen science groups for Task 2 data collection under lead partner’s direction as well as support community engagement efforts with direction from the VA/SAP consultant
Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): Yes Subcontractor 7 Name: Hercules Rotary Club
Contact Person: Tita Escalada
Position/Title: President
Phone & Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: Hercules Rotary Club will assist with completing Task 4 community engagement subtasks to inform the VA and SAP in the form of pop-ups, workshops, survey distribution, etc. under direction from the VA/SAP consultant. Additionally, Hercules Rotary Club will assist with Task 2 data collection under direction from the lead partner.

Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): Yes Subcontractor 8 Name: Nations of Lisjan
Contact Person: Corrina Gould
Position/Title: Tribal Chair
Phone & Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: Nations of Lisjan will be on the Technical Advisory Committee for the development of the VA and SAP. The Tribe will also provide special consultations with the VA/SAP consultant to contribute their specialized local knowledge of cultural sites that need to be assess and protected, stewardship practices to consider for nature-based solutions for adaptation strategies and more. Additionally, Nations of Lisjan will disseminate communications around the VA, data collection, and SAP to their networks to further development support. Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No):

Subcontractor 9 Name: Girl Scouts Troop 31806
Contact Person: Julie Nelson Bardenhagen
Position/Title: Troop leader
Phone & Email: 415-515-9190 [email protected] Mailing Address:

Federal Tax ID #:

Brief Description of their role in the project: Girl Scouts Troop 31806 will assist with completing Task 4 community engagement subtasks to inform the VA and SAP in the form of pop-ups, workshops, survey distribution, etc. under direction from the VA/SAP consultant. Additionally, the troop will assist with Task 2 data collection under direction from the lead partner.

4 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Letter of Commitment included in application? (Yes/No): Yes Project Information
Project Name Pinole-Hercules Multi-Jurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan Amount
Requested
$894,750.91 Total Project
Cost
$935,400.91
State Leveraged
Funds $40,650.00
Non-State
Leveraged
Funds
---
Project Duration
(in years) 24 months
Please indicate which of the following project types of SLR Adaptation Planning will be addressed by the proposed project (check all that apply):
☐ Community Visioning (Phase 1)
☒ Vulnerability Assessments (Phase 1)
☒ Data/Information Gathering (Phase 2)
☐ Outer Coast SLR Adaptation Plans (Phase 3)
☒ Multi-jurisdictional San Francisco Bay Shoreline Adaptation Plans (Phase 3) ☐ Single Jurisdiction San Francisco Bay Subregional Shoreline Adaptation Plans (Phase 3) ☐ City
☐ County
☐ Sector Specific Adaptation Plans (Phase 3) - Please refer to Section III. G. Proposal Requirements of the Solicitation for instructions regarding projects seeking to complete a Sector Specific Adaptation Plan. Do not complete a full proposal for a Sector Specific Adaptation Plan until you have received approval from OPC Staff. b. Section 2: Application Completeness Checklist
Item Requisite Complete
Section 1: Cover Page Required ☒
Section 2: Application Completeness Checklist Required ☒ Section 3: Project Description Required ☒

5 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Section 4: Project Work Plan Required ☒
Section 5: SLR Adaptation Criteria Justification Required ☒ Section 6: Project Schedule and Major Deliverables Required ☒ Section 7: Budget Required ☒
Section 8: Supplemental Documents
a. Project Team Resumes or Curricula Vitae Required ☒
b. Nonprofit Organization Pre-Award Questionnaire Required ☐ c. San Francisco Bay Multi-jurisdictional and Single
Jurisdiction Subregional Shoreline Adaptation Plan
Supplemental Questionnaire
Required ☒
d. Project Letters Conditional ☒

6 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Section 3: Project Description
Summary
The City of Pinole and the City of Hercules (the “Project Team”) are jointly applying for funding to complete a sea-level rise (SLR) vulnerability assessment, data collection, and a Multijurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan aligned with the Multi-jurisdictional San Francisco Bay Regional Shoreline Adaptation Plan (RSAP) guidelines for the shared Pinole-Hercules shoreline.

The partnership seeks to protect shared infrastructure, including the highly vulnerable PinoleHercules Wastewater Treatment Plant, and safeguard disadvantaged shoreline-adjacent areas from flooding and inundation, such as Bayfront Park and the Hercules Hub transit-oriented development (TOD).

All tasks will comply with SB 1 SLR Adaptation Criteria and RSAP guidelines and align with local plans like Pinole’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan and Hercules’ 2024 Hazard Mitigation Plan. The cities are also coordinating with Contra Costa County to align efforts with the County’s SB 1-funded project. The County will award each city $20, 280 which will be used to conduct outreach and community that support cohesive, community-driven planning.

By pooling resources, the project advances regional resilience and equity goals. Furthermore, The Project Team provided letters of commitment for the Rodeo Sanitation District’s SB 1 application, reinforcing regional collaboration and cost-effective SB 1 fund use.

Project Description
The Pinole-Hercules Sea Level Rise Adaptation Plan proposal seeks $894,750.91 $736,368.05 for SLR planning phases: Phase 1 (Vulnerability Assessment (VA) – Task 1), Phase 2 (Data Collection – Task 2), and Phase 3 (Multi-jurisdictional San Francisco Bay Shoreline Adaptation Plan (SAP) – Task 3). Tasks 4 and 5 detail engagement and project management. Both cities have begun the process of assessing risks associated with climate change, as evidenced by the City of Pinole’s inaugural Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP), which calls for a shoreline stabilization study and identification of flood mitigation actions. The City of Hercules mentions SLR as a hazard of concern in their Local Hazard Mitigation Plan as well as in key documents like the General Plan Safety and Land Use Elements, Capital Improvement Projects, and more. However, additional planning work in both cities is required to comply with SB 272.

This project is necessary to achieve the Cities’ goal to safeguard highly vulnerable shared and individual infrastructure in Pinole and Hercules from SLR through the development of an equitable Bay Shoreline Adaptation Plan. The Project will achieve this goal through:
• Development of a VA that will help identify priority action areas and prioritize key infrastructure and areas requiring immediate attention. (Element C) • Establishment of an Erosional Hotspot Monitoring Program. Data collection, led by the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), will supplement the VA to identify and mitigate erosional hotspots, define baseline conditions, support phased adaptation pathways, and increase community awareness.

7 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
• Development and Implementation of a Community Engagement Plan that provides various opportunities for the community to learn about and provide input on adaptation pathways and strategies.
• The resulting multi-jurisdictional SAP, aligned with the McAteer-Petris Act for the Bay Shoreline, will provide clear actionable strategies, and potential projects for implementation.

The Project Team consists of members of both cities’ Community Development Departments and Pinole’s Community Service’s Department. Lilly Whalen (Community Development Director), Kapil Amin (Sustainability Project Manager), Andrea Dwyer (Community Services Director), and Maria Picazo (Recreation Manager) will be project leads for the City of Pinole.

Timothy Rood (Community Development Director) and Seana Field (Senior Planner) will be project leads for the City of Hercules. Community-based organizations including Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed (FOPCW), Hercules Rotary, Girl Scouts Troop 31806, and Pinole Earth Team will assist with involving community members in the data collection phase and, supporting engagement activities as stipulated in the Community Engagement Plan. Pinole Senior Center, FOPCW, Hercules Rotary Club, Pinole Rotary Club, and Pinole Earth Team will support community engagement activities to ensure diverse perspectives inform the VA and SAP.

To support the project’s scientific integrity, cultural relevance, and community alignment, a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) will be convened. The TAC will include representatives from the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), Nations of Lisjan, and additional participants who bring a mix of technical expertise, local knowledge, and lived experience. The TAC will provide input on data collection methods, engagement strategies, and the development of adaptation pathways, helping ensure that the VA and SAP are informed by both best available science and the values and priorities of those most impacted.

The project’s scope of work will adhere to the goals of the OPC Strategic Plan, specifically OPC Strategic Plan targets by developing site-specific infrastructure resiliency plans focused on critical infrastructure (Target 1.1.2), and supporting collaborative access to and engagement in coastal policymaking (Target 2.2.2), and adhere to SB 1 SLR Adaptation Criteria, and BCDC RSAP guidelines, including required elements and minimum standards, as further detailed in the work plan.

Relative Need for SLR Planning and Likelihood of Success Resources provided by Surging Seas Risk Finder and NOAA Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Viewer highlight SLR risks for Pinole and Hercules along San Pablo Bay. Pinole faces compounded risks of flooding, displacement, and rising groundwater hazards. According to the Surging Seas Risk Finder, there is a 98% chance of at least one flood over three feet occurring along the Pinole-Hercules shoreline by 2050. This, combined with storm surges and groundwater emergence, poses flooding or inundation risks to disadvantaged residential areas, Bayfront Park, Pinole High School, the Pinole Library, the developing Hercules Hub transit center and TOD, as well as Hercules’ open spaces, wetlands, and the undeveloped Hercules Point peninsula, envisioned as a future regional park. Of critical importance and concern to

8 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
both cities is the jointly used Pinole-Hercules Water Pollution Control Plant, which is situated along the shoreline and treats all residential and commercial wastewater from Hercules and most from Pinole, serving about 40,000 residents.

As part of the ongoing update to the Safety Element, the City of Pinole conducted a draft VA , which includes SLR as a hazard of concern, as required by California Senate Bill (SB) 379. SB 379 mandates that local jurisdictions incorporate climate change and resilience strategies into their General Plan. However, while the draft VA is foundational, it does not meet the more specific requirements of SB 272 (Laird, 2023). A more detailed SLR-focused VA is needed to address infrastructure-specific risks, inform precise adaptation strategies, and ensure long-term compliance with SB 272.

Pinole recently worked with Contra Costa County to update the Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJLHMP). Pinole’s adopted local annex to the MJLHMP identifies SLR as a key vulnerability due to its location bordering San Pablo Bay. While significant impacts are not expected until water levels increase by 4 to 6 feet, such a rise could cause moderate-tosignificant flooding at the Pinole-Hercules Water Pollution Control Plant, a critical facility. These events also increase the risk of infrastructure corrosion, including damage to septic systems, due to higher salt content. Impacts would disproportionately affect vulnerable populations by compromising water quality, disrupting essential wastewater services, and limiting access to safe evacuation routes during emergencies. Repair costs could strain city resources, potentially delaying recovery efforts in low-income communities. Additionally, city employees would face the challenge of inspecting streets, storm drains, trash capture devices, and other infrastructure, with urgent action needed to ensure public safety.

In 2021 the City of Pinole adopted Resolution No. 2021-93, declaring a state of Climate Emergency, and directing the development of the CAAP. The CAAP development process, which occurred 2022-2024, included extensive community engagement through a combination of surveys, pop-ups, workshops, and stakeholder meetings, ensuring significant community buy-in and support. Both the Council and community strongly support SLR adaptation efforts, indicating this Project’s strong likelihood of success based on community readiness to engage.

During the CAAP development process, the City of Pinole engaged with regional stakeholders to address SLR, including the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed, the Nations of Lisjan, and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC). These organizations have expressed their willingness to support and collaborate in whatever capacity to advance the City’s SLR adaptation efforts and are listed as Project Partners in the CAAP (see page 7 of City of Pinole CAAP). The City of Pinole and Hercules also benefit from local environmental community-based organizations, such as Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed, Pinole Rotary Club, Pinole Earth Team, Girl Scouts and the Hercules Rotary Club, which will help rally community support and will increase project viability.

The City of Hercules also faces SLR risks, particularly to its open spaces and wetlands along the waterfront. Hercules Point, an undeveloped peninsula envisioned as a future regional park, is especially vulnerable. While the Hercules community has been introduced to SLR impacts

9 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
through its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) – which included equitable outreach during the public comment period to engage vulnerable populations – comprehensive SLR planning in Hercules has not yet been undertaken. This grant represents a critical chance for Hercules to advance their desire for actionable SLR adaptation strategies while aligning efforts with Pinole to safeguard shared assets such as the Wastewater Treatment Plant and surrounding infrastructure. Foundational engagement through the LHMP has heightened community awareness, creating momentum for a collaborative, impactful adaptation plan.

Community Description
The cities of Pinole and Hercules, with populations of just under 20,000 and 26,000 respectively, are located in the San Francisco Bay Area and face shared challenges from SLR.

Both cities contain socially and economically diverse communities with varying levels of resilience to environmental and economic risks.

In Pinole, SLR projections highlight significant flooding risks, particularly in western Pinole, an area that contains much of the city’s multifamily housing and is identified in the Housing Element (page 192) by UC Berkeley's Urban Displacement Project as highly prone to displacement. Northwestern Pinole residents face compounding vulnerabilities, including lower incomes and home values, flood risks, and high levels of pollution exposure—ranking in the 81- 90th percentile for diesel particulate matter, toxic releases, and lead contamination. The City's senior population, comprising 22% of its total residents, is notably higher than that of Contra Costa County (17.7%), California (14.9%), and the national average (16.5%). This demographic is particularly vulnerable to extreme heat and other climate-related impacts.

Similarly, Hercules has identified underserved populations near its waterfront, including vulnerable groups such as low-income households (23% living below 150% of the poverty level) and cost-burdened residents (15.5%). The city also has a significant proportion of seniors (36%) and children under 17 (38.4%), as well as a diverse population, with 85.8% identifying as racial or ethnic minorities. Outreach during Hercules’ LHMP featured equitable engagement practices with these groups, incorporating targeted events and accessible participation options such as virtual meetings and after-hours scheduling. These strategies will inform engagement practices and activities for the Project’s SLR planning and climate adaptation efforts. Together, Pinole and Hercules demonstrate a shared commitment to inclusivity and proactive climate planning, creating pathways for sustainable adaptation that prioritize those most at risk.

Tribal Partnership
The tasks in this grant’s scope of work will be informed by the invaluable tribal knowledge of Nations of Lisjan. Tribal Chair Corrina Gould will serve on the Technical Advisory Committee contributing insight to both the VA and SAP. Additionally, the Tribe will provide specialized consultations to ensure cultural sites are appropriately identified, assessed, and protected, and that the SAP reflects Indigenous stewardship practices rooted in place-based resilience. Building on their vital contributions to Pinole’s CAAP, this partnership will deepen relationships between local governments and Tribal communities, while helping ensure that adaptation strategies reflect traditional ecological wisdom. The resulting benefits—culturally informed planning,

10 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
protected heritage resources, and strengthened regional collaboration—will enhance resilience not only for Tribal and local communities, but for the broader San Pablo Bay shoreline.

Project Area Map
Figure 1: Graphic of Pinole Shoreline depicting SLR risk using the NOAA Sea Level Rise Viewer Figure 2: Graphic of Hercules Shoreline depicting SLR risk using the NOAA Sea Level Rise Viewer

11 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Section 4: Project Work Plan
All tasks will align with RSAP guidelines and local plans, including CAAP and the Hercules LHMP.

The project will also leverage funds awarded to Contra Costa County for SB 1 (estimated at $20,280 per city) for outreach and community engagement to ensure the final deliverables are community-driven and cohesive across jurisdictions.

Task 1 (Phase 1 - Vulnerability Assessment): The vulnerability assessment (VA) for the Pinole and Hercules shoreline will align with Pinole’s CAAP and the Hercules’ LHMP, with recommendations outlined in the 2024 State of California SLR Guidance. SFEI will lead the development of Element B Existing Conditions Assessment and the Consultant Team (“Consultants”) will lead development of Element C VA, described below.

Subtask 1.1 Develop Existing Conditions Assessment. SFEI, with direction from City staff, will first conduct an Existing Conditions assessment, consistent with Element B of the RSAP guidelines, identifying relevant plans, policies, and studies, as well as gathering information on and mapping the physical and ecological conditions of the landscape. The existing conditions will also map and describe existing populations, assets/services (including those named in the Minimum Categories and Assets Standard of the RSAP guidelines), and land uses within the planning area.. These initial maps will be used to develop community outreach material for the first round of engagement associated with the VA (see Task 4).

Subtask 1.2 Develop Vulnerability Assessment. Consultants will then conduct a VA for the planning area consistent with Element C of the RSAP guidelines. The VA will map and describe the exposure of people, assets, ecosystems and services (including those listed in the Minimum Categories and Assets Standard) to coastal flood hazards, including inundation, erosion, storms and bluff collapse and other hazards for 0.8 ft( 2050), 3.1 ft (2100), 4.9 ft (2100), and 6.6 ft (2100) SLR scenarios, at a minimum." The VA will identify priority action areas, determined by the Existing Conditions assessment and engagement (Task 4.2)and assess the vulnerability of each. Vulnerability is defined as the product of "Exposure x Sensitivity x Adaptive Capacity.” Physical hazards such as inundation, wave run-up, erosion, and groundwater intrusion will receive special attention, particularly for risks to the Wastewater Treatment Plant's structural integrity and operational functionality. The VA will also consider cascading hazards, such as power outages caused by storm surges, which could disrupt the facility’s essential services.

The assessment will address broader impacts to interconnected infrastructure, such as wastewater conveyance lines, nearby evacuation routes, and adjacent residential and commercial areas. This systems-based approach ensures that vulnerabilities within the regional infrastructure network are accounted for. Coordination with state agencies and core sector assessments, as outlined in the 2018 Local Coastal Program Guidance, will also be included.

Draft VA will be submitted to BCDC for the comments before finalizing.

Task 1 Deliverables:
● Element B Existing Conditions Assessment

12 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
● Element C Draft and Final Vulnerability Assessment
Task 2 (Phase 2 Data Collection/Information Gathering): Led by an experienced research partner, the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), this task will collect new, site-specific data to directly inform the VA and guide the development of a responsive SAP . This effort aligns with Pinole’s CAAP, specifically Action SLR-1c, which calls for implementing a Shoreline Monitoring Program (Program) to identify erosional hotspots and ensure timely responses .

This type of monitoring is especially critical in areas like the Hercules-Pinole shoreline, where a 2023 landslide forced the long-term closure of the Bay Trail due to severe erosion—highlighting the urgent need for localized data to anticipate and mitigate future storm impacts. Data collection will address key gaps in existing datasets, specifically the lack of localized, real-time information on shoreline dynamics, flooding behavior, and salinity intrusion, which present an opportunity to improve the accuracy and specificity of the VA and better inform the design of adaptation strategies. This effort will not only generate supplemental data to improve hazard modeling in the VA, but also help define actionable adaptation thresholds and triggers, and the design of adaptation strategies, that guide future decision-making.

To carry out this work, SFEI will implement two complementary forms of qualitative visual data collection: fixed-point photo-monitoring using CoastSnap (or a similar cradle-based system) and community-based documentation of flooding during king tide and storm events. CoastSnap photo stations will be installed at strategic shoreline locations in both cities to generate consistent, repeatable imagery capturing changes in shoreline position, marsh edge, and beach width over time. This method provides a cost-effective way to observe ongoing shoreline evolution between major mapping or Lidar efforts, helping validate projected shoreline change and identify erosion patterns.

As a complementary effort, SFEI will coordinate with community partners and the City to design and lead public king tide photo collection events. During these events, community partners will play a key role in engaging the residents they serve—ensuring broader awareness, participation, and representation from populations most affected by flooding. These events offer residents a powerful opportunity to document flooding conditions in real time using smartphones and a shared posting platform such as California King Tides, MyCoast, or a projectspecific tool. By making flood impacts visible and participatory, these events not only foster local awareness of sea-level rise and its consequences, but also invite the public into the planning process—building environmental literacy and trust. The photos collected will help distinguish between stormwater and tidal flooding, particularly when paired with handheld salinity testing, and will generate a high-resolution visual dataset of shoreline vulnerability across the most at-risk areas. This community-generated dataset fills a critical information gap where existing models may miss localized flood pathways or barriers, directly informing the flood exposure analysis in the VA.

The outcome of the project will be specialized, supplemental data to support VA development and refine adaptation pathways and strategies by establishing a preliminary dataset that can help inform future triggers in the Pinole-Hercules Shoreline Adaptation Plan. Community engagement will be a key component of the Program, empowering residents to participate in

13 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
evaluation of shoreline vulnerabilities through community-based events, mobile apps, and shoreline walks with technical experts. These activities are designed to generate useful data and deepen community understanding of shoreline risk via sea level rise and compound flooding. The outcome will be a robust dataset that informs near-term planning decisions while laying the foundation for long-term community-supported shoreline management.

Deliverables
● Draft Data Report
● Final Data Report
Task 3 (Phase 3- Multi-jurisdictional San Francisco Bay Shoreline Adaptation Plan): Given Pinole and Hercules are neighboring cities within the same Pinole Operational Landscape Unit, the two jurisdictions are collaborating on a joint Bay Shoreline Adaptation Plan for efficient use of resources. This collaboration stems from shared critical infrastructure, the Pinole-Hercules Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is vulnerable to flooding and rising groundwater impacts.

This partnership ensures cost and time efficiencies while creating consistent, actionable solutions. Streamlining the assessment, data gathering, and adaptation pathways strategies will significantly advance implementation. Furthermore, ongoing coordination with the County will further accelerate the achievement of the project goals. The plan will be developed in alignment with Element A-G of the RSAP guidelines. During this process, the planning team will meet with BCDC at least 3 times-an initial consultation meeting, prior to developing evaluation criteria, and prior to local adoption.

Subtask 3.1 Element A Development. The consultant team, with support from Pinole and Hercules city staff, will be in charge of developing Element A for their Multijurisdictional SAP.

Element A will include a list of subregional partners, describe the multijurisdictional process, and summarize the equitable engagement throughout the planning process (Task 4.1).

Subtask 3.2 Develop Local Vision and Goals. In the second phase of engagement, Consultants will engage City Staff, engagement partners, and the public around a local vision and goals for the planning area (Task 4). Consultants will utilize feedback from these stakeholders to develop a local vision and goals for the Adaptation Plan. This will help develop Element requirement D1.

Subtask 3.3 Develop Adaptation Strategy Alternatives Based on this vision and the goals that result from the community engagement, results of the VA (Task 1) and monitoring program (Task 2), Consultants will identify adaptation strategy alternatives and adaptation pathways that demonstrate feasible flood risk reduction for priority areas under the 0.8 ft scenario (2050) and 3.1 ft scenario (2100). Importantly, the adaptation strategies will adhere to the Adaptation Strategy Standards as defined in the SAP guidelines. This subtask will support development of Element requirement D2.

Subtask 3.4 Develop Evaluation Criteria and Evaluate Adaptation Strategies and Pathways Consultants will again engage the public, City staff, community organizations and other stakeholders (Task 4) around evaluation criteria, which will serve as the basis for the evaluation of adaptation alternatives, including both physical and non-physical strategies. Examples of

14 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
possible evaluation criteria include physical and economic feasibility, capital and long-term maintenance, benefits to public health, improved recreation, ecosystem/habitat improvement etc. Evaluation criteria will include a scoring system of some means of evaluating strategies against each other. By carefully selecting evaluation criteria, the Project Team will be in a position to consider and in some cases advocate for nature-based solution alternatives. This subtask will support development of Element requirement D3.

Subtask 3.5 Develop Conceptual Plans and Descriptions of Adaptation Strategies. Public engagement, in addition to the data collection phase, will help to inform Consultants’ proposed conceptual plans and descriptions of selected adaptation strategies, potentially including nature-based solutions, in priority areas. The Adaptation Strategy Standards will inform Adaptation Strategies. Conceptual designs will then go back to the community, engagement partners, City staff, and other stakeholders for feedback, questions and comments at community workshops and pop-up events described in Task 4. This subtask will support development of Element requirement D4.

Subtask 3.6 Land Use and Policy Changes. After evaluating and selecting adaptation strategies and pathways, Consultants will work with Pinole and Hercules staff to identify and propose land use and policy changes necessary to implement adaptation strategies over time, noting equity implications of proposed land use approaches. This subtask will inform Element E.

Subtask 3.7 Implementation Plan & Priority Project List. Consultants, through consultation with City staff, will lead the development of an implementation plan that identifies next steps and responsible entities for implementing the selected adaptation strategies and pathways. The implementation plan will also include a funding strategy that identifies potential adaptation costs and sources of funding to implement strategies and pathways, and a monitoring program that builds upon the Task 2 monitoring program to describe how adaptation strategies and triggers are being assessed. Then, a list of priority projects to support shoreline resilience will be determined based on previous tasks. This subtask will inform Element F and G.

Subtask 3.8 Draft and Final Multi-Jurisdictional SAP. Consultants will bring a draft MultiJurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan that includes Elements A-G of the RSAP guidelines to the appropriate departments/commissions of both cities for review and comment. Consultants will make any revisions necessary before finalizing the SAP. Consultants will also support City staff in determining the appropriate level of environmental analysis required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and bring the SAP to each City Council for adoption. Consultants will support the preparation of staff reports, agendas, and presentations needed to support adoption of the Multi-Jurisdictional SAP at the City of Pinole City Council and City of Hercules City Council. Then, the plan will be submitted to BCDC for final approval.

Task 3 Deliverables:
● Draft Element A
● Draft SAP (Element A-G)
● Final SAP (Element A-G)
● Agendas, Staff Reports, and Presentation for City Council Meetings

15 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Task 4 (Community Engagement): Community engagement, led by Consultants, with support from Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed (FOPCW) Hercules Rotary, Pinole Earth Team, and City staff, will be a vital piece for the development of the VA, data collection and Adaptation Plan.

FOPCW, Hercules Rotary, Pinole Earth Team, and Pinole Rotary have committed to engaging the community in both traditional and unique ways to ensure their vision is reflected in the SAP. By pre-identifying community partners, the City of Pinole has put Consultants in a good position to reach and connect with community members to ensure that the VA and Adaptation plan deliverables are rooted in community needs and priorities. Previous collaborations and established relationships with these groups will increase project viability. FOPCW supported the City with adoption of a single-use plastics ordinance, Pinole Earth Team is assisting the City with on-land visual trash assessments, and Pinole Rotary was supportive in promoting the Pinole Energy Enhancement Rebate program.

Subtask 4.1 Develop Community Engagement Plan. Consultants, with community partners named above will develop a Community Engagement Plan that will support all other tasks (Task 1-3). The Community Engagement Plan will include traditional methods, such as town halls, workshops, virtual meetings, and surveys, as well as targeted engagement methods for underserved communities, including multi-lingual outreach and focus groups/pop-ups that meet community members where they are. Consultants, in coordination with community partners and City staff, will create clear, visually engaging presentations, boards, fact sheets, and digital resources to inform and attract a broad audience. Materials will be offered in multiple languages and integrate accessible formats (e.g., large print, digital links) and ensure all materials reflect community interests and cultural contexts, per the Equity Assessment Standard.

Subtask 4.2 First Phase of Engagement – Vulnerability Assessment Engagement Activities. For the first phase of engagement associated with the Existing Conditions Assessment and Vulnerability Assessment, Consultants will deliver, at a minimum: two (2) community meetings to review hazard exposure maps and introduce the project and opportunities to be involved in each jurisdiction; two (2) community workshops that will feature StoryMapping and other digital mapping tools, to help residents identify community resources and priority action areas for the VA; one (1) senior center focus group, and information stations at two (2) community events. After the completion of the first phase of community engagement activities, Consultants will deliver a VA engagement report that documents feedback received and how it will be/or was incorporated into the Vulnerability Assessment.

Subtask 4.3 Second Phase of Engagement – Data/Information Gathering Engagement Activities. The second phase of engagement will align with Task 2: Data/Information Gathering.

Community Partners including Friends of Pinole Creek Watershed, Hercules Rotary, and Pinole Earth Team will support SFEI in connecting with their members to support data collection efforts via Public King Tide Photo Collection Events and shoreline walks with technical experts.

SFEI will be responsible for developing a concise engagement report that summarizes how the community was involved in data collection efforts.

16 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Subtask 4.4 Third Phase of Engagement – Adaptation Plan Engagement Activities. In the third phase of engagement, which supports the development of adaptation strategies, pathways, and the SAP, the consultant-led Project Team will carry out a series of coordinated outreach activities to gather community input. This phase will include two (2) community workshops in each jurisdiction to co-develop a local vision and goals; one (1) joint survey for residents of Pinole and Hercules to gather feedback on these shared priorities; and one (1) focus group with the Pinole Senior Center to ensure senior perspectives are reflected. To reach a broader audience, the Project Team will also deliver four (4) presentations to neighborhood councils, tenants/homeowners’ associations across both cities. In addition, two (2) community workshops will be held to collect feedback on draft adaptation strategies, pathways, and evaluation criteria, along with two (2) community pop-up stations designed to engage residents and gather input on adaptation concepts in more informal, accessible settings.

Community engagement, led by the Project Team, Friends of Pinole Creek, Pinole Earth Team, Hercules Rotary and other Community Partners will play a central role in ensuring strategies reflect community priorities. Engagement will include traditional methods, such as workshops, pop-ups, virtual meetings, and surveys. Innovative approaches may also be considered, such as hosting scenario planning games and community assemblies to explore adaptation strategies and gather input on their tradeoffs. Additionally, online platforms like digital idea boards could be used, allowing residents to submit and vote on adaptation ideas and fostering ongoing involvement. These engagement methods would ensure community feedback directly shapes the plan and builds trust in its implementation.

Task 4 Deliverables:
● Draft and Final Engagement Plan
● Outreach Materials, including survey, outreach boards, flyers, etc., to support Phase 1-3 engagements
● Meeting Agendas, Presentations, Notes
● Phase 1 Engagement Report – VA
● Phase 2 Engagement Report – Data
● Phase 3 Engagement Report - AP
Task 5 (Project Management): Project management will be essential to ensure the seamless execution of the VA, data collection, and Adaptation Plan. Management activities will be conducted in parallel with all tasks to support timely coordination, progress tracking, and adherence to deliverables and grant requirements. Project Management will include development and release of the RFP for the lead consultant (responsible for the VA, community engagement, Multi-jurisdictional Adaptation Plan), bi-monthly meetings between City staff and Consultants; quarterly progress reports and a system for regular communication with key stakeholders that offers structured opportunities for input and tracks updates throughout all phases of the project.

Task 5 Deliverables:
● Consultant Team Request for Proposal
● Quarterly reports and Invoices

17 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721

18 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
a. Section 5: SLR Adaptation Criteria Justification
The Pinole-Hercules Multi-Jurisdictional Shoreline Adaptation Plan will adhere to all SLR Adaptation Criteria.

b. Section 6: Project Schedule and Major Deliverables
Project Schedule
Year 1 – 2025, Start date November 1, 2025
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Task 1 X X
Task 2 X X
Task 3
Task 4
Task 5 X X
2026
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Task 1 X X X X X (DL

1.1)

X X X X X X X
Task 2 X X X X X X X X X X X X (DL

2.3)
Task 3 X X (DL

3.1)

X X X X X X X X X
Task 4 X X X (DL

4.1)

X X X X
(DL

4.2,

4.2. 1)

X X X (DL

4.3,

4.3.1 )
X X
Task 5 X
(DL

5.5. 1,

X X X (DL

5.1.3 )
X X X
(DL

5.1. 4)

X X X (DL

5.1.5 )
X X

20 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721

5.5. 2)
2027
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Task 1 X X X (DL

1.2)
Task 2 X
(DL

2.5)
Task 3 X X X X X X X
(DL

3.8. 1)

X X X (DL

3.8.2 ,

3.8.3 )
Task 4 X X X (DL

4.4,

4.4.1 )
Task 5 X
(DL

5.1. 6)

X X X (DL

5.1.7 )
X X X
(DL

5.1. 8)

X X X (DL

5.1.9 )
DL

5.1.1 0)

21 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Major Deliverable Milestones
Task Deliverable ID Deliverable Name Estimated Due Date Task 1: Vulnerability
Assessment
DL 1.1 Element B Existing Conditions Assessment May-26
DL 1.2 Element C Draft and Final Vulnerability Assessment Mar-27 Task 2: Data collection DL 2.3 Draft Data Report Dec-26 DL 2.5 Final Data Report Jan-27
DL 3.1 Element A Planning Process Mar-26
Task 3: Adaptation
Plan
DL 3.8.1 Draft Adaptation Plan Jul-27
DL 3.8.2 Final Adaptation Plan Oct-27
DL 3.8.3 Agendas/Staff Reports/ Council Presentation Oct-27 Task 4: Community
Engagement
DL 4.1 Draft and Final Engagement Report Mar 26
DL 4.2 Task 1 Engagement Report Jul-26
DL 4.2.1 Task 1 Outreach Materials Jul-26
DL 4.3 Task 2 Engagement Report Oct-26
DL 4.3.1 Task 2 Outreach Materials Oct-26
DL 4.4 Task 3 Engagement Report Mar-27
DL 4.4.1 Task 3 Outreach Materials Mar-27
Task 5: Administration
Coordination and
Reporting
DL 5.1.1 Consultant Team selected proposal Jan-26
DL 5.1.2 Quarterly report for Q1 activities Jan-26
DL 5.1.3 Quarterly report for Q2 activities Apr-26
DL 5.1.4 Quarterly report for Q3 activities Jul-26
DL 5.1.5 Quarterly report for Q4 activities Oct-26
DL 5.1.6 Quarterly report for Q5 activities Jan-27
DL 5.1.7 Quarterly report for Q6 activities Apr-27
DL 5.1.8 Quarterly report for Q7 activities Jul-27
DL 5.1.9 Quarterly report for Q8 activities Oct27
DL 5.1.10
Quarterly report for Q9 activities Dec-27

c. Section 7: Budget
Section D Budget:

Task 1 Task 2 Task 3 Task 4 Task 5 Total
Personnel $42,689.78 $12,382.86 $37,057.22 $40,316.16* $65,021 $157,150.91 $144,768.05
Travel -- -- -- -- -- --
Subcontractor(s) $170,000 $143,000 $250,000 $120,000 $683,000 $540,000
Equipment/
Materials
-- $3,000 -- $15,000 -- $18,000
$15,000
Overhead -- -- -- -- -- --
Seniors Focus
Group
compensation
$1,600 $1,600
Nations of Lisjan
compensation
$5,000 $5,000
Community
Partners
compensation
$30,000 $30,000

23 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
Task Total $212,689.78 $158,382.86 $287,057.22 $171,600.00 $65,021 $894,750.91 $736,368.05
*This cost is fully offset by anticipated SB 1 funds from Contra Costa County (approximately $40,650), to support community visioning and engagement Agreement Total: $894,750.91

Budget Justification
The Cities of Pinole and Hercules have developed a strategically structured budget to ensure the successful completion of all project tasks while maximizing cost-efficiency through a collaborative approach. By pooling resources and expertise, the Cities eliminate duplicative costs and deliver an adaptable, cohesive plan for their shared shoreline. The budget supports a multi-phase workplan aligning with technical, regulatory, and community engagement requirements.

Personnel Costs
Personnel costs of $198,642.71 ($157,150.86 for this request plus $40,316.16 match from Contra Costa County) ensure effective management and oversight of all tasks, including drafting RFPs, coordinating subcontractor activities, supporting technical review, developing public-facing materials, conducting community engagement, and preparing progress reports. Fully burdened hourly rates account for anticipated escalations during the project. Key roles include:
● Pinole and Hercules Community Development Directors ($236.11/hour and $163.17/hour):

Provide strategic oversight, agency coordination, and ensure compliance with OPC criteria. ● Pinole Sustainability Project Manager ($59.44/hour): Leads technical deliverables, project management, and community engagement coordination.
● Hercules Senior Planner ($93.71/hour): Supports logistical execution, stakeholder coordination, and workshop facilitation.
● Pinole Community Services Director ($148.32/hour): Organize Senior Advisory Group and host senior focus groups at Pinole Senior Center
● Pinole Recreation Manager ($95.07/hour): Organize Pinole Senior Advisory Group and host senior focus groups.

Fully burdened hourly rates include anticipated escalations over the project duration. Key task allocations reflect the complexity and scope of the work:
● Task 1 (Vulnerability Assessment): 393 hours to draft and finalize the RFP, establish a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), coordinate with consultant and stakeholders, oversee subcontractor progress, provide data and reports to consultant team, and review draft and final VA documents aligned with OPC criteria and RSAP guidelines.

24 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
● Task 2 (Data Collection): 102 hours to manage and coordinate SFEI and Community Partners, solicit feedback and integrate findings into the VA and Adaptation Plan. ● Task 3 (Adaptation Plan): 310 hours for collaborative planning, scenario analyses, participate in adaptation strategy review and evaluation, coordinate interdepartmental and interagency and review of adaptation strategies and roles in implementation, alignment of strategies across jurisdictions, and review draft deliverable Element A-F producing a robust Shoreline Adaptation Plan.
● Task 4 (Community Engagement): 346 hours to support and monitor engagement. This staff contribution will be funded in its entirety by funds provided by Contra Costa County to support community visioning and engagement. This engagement will additionally benefit Rodeo Sanitary District, if their application is funded. ● Task 5 (Administration and Reporting): 545 hours for contract management, grant management, billing and invoicing, coordinating interdepartmental and interagency communication, tracking progress, and producing eight quarterly reports to ensure adherence to timelines and grant requirements.

This allocation ensures high-quality oversight while optimizing workflow and achieving cost efficiencies through interjurisdictional collaboration, leveraging shared resources and avoiding duplicative administration.

Subcontractor Costs
Subcontractors contribute advanced expertise in coastal hazards, data analysis, and scenario planning, resulting in high-quality outcomes. Cost efficiencies are achieved through shared subcontractor use, promoting regional consistency and minimizing duplication and waste.

Community Partners will be compensated $5,000 for their contributions as described under Section 1 Subcontractor Information. Nations of Lisjan will be compensated $5,000 for their contributions as described under Section 1 Subcontractor Information.

A total of $683,000 is allocated for subcontractor services to execute highly technical tasks:
● Task 1 ($170,000): Conduct a comprehensive Existing Conditions and Vulnerability Assessment, modeling sea-level rise scenarios, assessing cascading hazards, and aligning with OPC criteria and SAP guidelines. This budget includes $18,300 for SFEI to:
o Prepare Section B2 of Existing Conditions Assessment meeting SAP standards (60 hours)
o Coordinate with VA consultant to ensure use of best available science, data and maps for use in the VA (3 meetings) (12 hours)
● Task 2 ($ 143,000): This includes funds for SFEI to implement a data collection program, identify erosional hotspots, and integrate data collection with engagement opportunities. o Photo-Monitoring Cradle (103 hours)
o Ground-Truth Flood Photo System (108 hours)
o Data Collection Community Engagement Vehicles/Events (300 hours)

25 FULL PROPOSAL|CNRA OPC 721
o Integration of photo-monitoring analysis with Vulnerability/Adaptation Plans (134 hours)
● Task 3 ($250,000): Create the Shoreline Adaptation Plan (Element A-F), including detailed adaptation strategies, implementation plan, and monitoring program. ● Task 4 ($120,000): Facilitate robust community engagement through workshops spearheaded by lead consultant, SFEI, Project Team and a variety of community partners .

This budget includes $19,900 for SFEI to serve in an advisory role to:
○ Provide feedback on the engagement strategy in coordination with City and VA/AP consultant (12 hours)
○ Advise on the design of public survey and outreach materials (poster boards, digital mapping platform/engagement tools) (12 hours)
○ Support the design and assist in facilitating (4) community workshops across VA/AP outside Data Collection Task (12 hours)
○ Attend (4) pop-up events with community partners (24 hours) ○ Advise on the design/support City in conducting focus group engagement (two meetings for focus groups) (12 hours)
○ Advise on the tribal consultation engagement (two meetings for tribal engagement) (12 hours)
○ Advise the VA/AP consultant to appropriately design materials consistent with their workstreams (12 hours)
○ Review draft Community Engagement Reports for VA and AP (12 hours) Materials Budget
The $18,000 $15,000 materials budget supports essential community engagement activities and tools needed to facilitate inclusive, high-impact outreach, including poster boards, printed maps, printed flyers, surveys, and promotional materials. Costs also cover venue rentals, audio/visual equipment, and digital tools like idea boards, fostering creative input and inclusivity. The City of Pinole will take the lead on procuring and installing data collection tools such as CoastSnap in both Pinole and Hercules.

Fiscal Responsibility and Collaborative Efficiency
This budget reflects a fiscally responsible approach that leverages shared resources, eliminates duplication, and maximizes regional alignment. By working together, Pinole and Hercules deliver a scalable, cost-effective model for regional resilience that meets regulatory standards, reflects community priorities, and serves as a blueprint for other small coastal jurisdictions.

WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above; and
WHEREAS, the California Natural Resources Agency has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Natural Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval by the potential grantee’s governing board either before submission of said application(s) to the State or prior to execution of the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant/Grantee, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the project
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the _____________________________________________________

1. If applicable, approves the filing of an application for the _______________________________________; to be funded by ________________________________________________________________________.

2. If applicable, certifies that Applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s) consistent with the land tenure requirements; or will secure the resources to do so;

3. Certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), legal requirements for building codes, health and safety codes, the California Labor Code, disabled access laws, and, that prior to commencement of the project, all applicable permits will have been obtained; and,

4. Certifies that the Applicant/Grantee will work towards the State Planning Priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety as included in Government Code Section 65041.1, and,

5. Appoints the ___________________________________, or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project(s).

Approved and adopted the __________day of __________ 20____. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Number __________ was duly adopted by the __________________________________.

Following Roll Call Vote: Ayes: _________
Nos: _________

Absent: _________
__________________________________________, _____________________________________________ (Signature) (Title)
OCEAN PROTECTION COUNCIL – RESOLUTION TEMPLATE
Resolution No: _______________________
RESOLUTION BY ________________________________________________________________________

APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR AND/OR EXECUTION OF GRANT FUNDS FROM THE OCEAN

PROTECTION COUNCIL UNDER THE SAFE DRINKING WATER, WATER QUALITY AND SUPPLY, FLOOD CONTROL, RIVER AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2006 (Proposition 84), Prop 68,

ENVIRONMENTAL LICENSE PLATE FUNDS, ONCE THROUGH COOLING, GREENHOUSE GAS

REDUCTION FUND, OR GENERAL FUNDS
Governing Board Resolution CNRA OPC 012

CITY COUNCIL
REPORT 9.D.

DATE: DECEMBER 2, 2025
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: Lilly Whalen, Community Development Director, 510-724-9832, [email protected]
Keith Marks, Chief Building Official, 510-724-9016, [email protected] SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE AND UPDATE THE CITY’S

BUILDING AND FIRE CODE AND ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION

APPROVING FINDINGS TO SUPPORT LOCAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council:
1- Adopt a Resolution Approving Findings to Support Local Modifications to the 2025 Building Code; and
2- Conduct a Second Reading of an Ordinance Adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Code in the form of updates to the City's Building and Fire Code

BACKGROUND
The California Building Standards Commission (the “Commission”) is a State agency responsible for producing sensible and usable state building standards, and the administrative regulations that implement and enforce those standards. Every three years the Commission reviews and updates the California Building, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical and Residential Codes that apply in California. The newly updated 2025 California Building Standards Codes (“CBSC”), which include updates to the State Fire Code, becomes effective in California cities on January 1, 2026. The California Health and Safety Code requires local agencies to adopt the building standards contained in the uniform statewide codes but allows cities to modify the codes to reflect local conditions. Pinole previously adopted its current codes in 2022, incorporating and modifying the City’s Municipal Code (Title 15) to comply with the 2022 CBSC updates.

On October 21, 2025 the City Council conducted a public hearing and read by title only an Ordinance to adopt new Building and Fire Codes.

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
On October 21, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing and introduced by title only an ordinance to adopt the 2025 California Building Standards Code, with local amendments to

the Building and Fire Codes. The Council approved the ordinance to move forward to second reading. During the discussion, Council raised a question regarding a missing percentage reference in one section of the Fire Code amendments. This was confirmed to be a typographical error, which was corrected orally by the Fire Chief at the hearing. The Ordinance has since been updated to reflect that correction.

Following the public hearing, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (ConFire) provided clarifying edits to ensure consistent terminology and enforcement references. The WUI ordinance includes clerical updates and one clarifying amendment: Section [A]101.5 now specifies when additions or alterations to existing buildings must meet current WUI standards and adds supporting definitions in Section 202. Section 508 is also revised to narrow noncombustible fencing requirements to perimeter lots with fencing within 30 feet of a structure, with minor adjustments to exception language. These changes strengthen clarity and consistency without expanding compliance requirements. All edits, shown in tracked changes in Attachment C, have been incorporated into the final ordinance in Attachment B.

State law requires the City to adopt express findings demonstrating that each local amendment to the California Building Standards Code is reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. The draft Resolution included as Attachment A contains the necessary findings to support the proposed local amendments.

Environmental Review
Adoption of the attached Ordinance is exempt from CEQA based on the general rule set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3) that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the attached Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact of adopting the 2025 CBSC. City’s costs related to implementation of the 2025 CBSC are recovered through building permit fees

ATTACHMENTS
A. Resolution
B. Ordinance
C. Redlined WUI

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE

APPROVING FINDINGS TO SUPPORT LOCAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE STANDARDS CONTAINED IN THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE, ENACTED AS PART OF ORDINANCE NO. 2025-XX
WHEREAS, Section 17922 of the California Health and Safety Code requires that local agencies adopt the building standards contained in the California Building Code, the California Fire Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California wildland-urban interface code the California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code, as such codes are approved by the State Building Standards Commission (collectively, the “California Building Standards Code”); and
WHEREAS Section 17958.7 of the California Health and Safety Code allows local agencies to enact modifications to those building standards provided that such modifications are reasonably necessary because of local climatic, geological or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS Section 17958.7 of the California Health and Safety Code further provides that a local agency which enacts modifications to those building standards must adopt findings which tie those modifications to such local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Pinole City Council has considered whether certain modifications to the building standards contained in the California Building Standards Code are necessary in Pinole due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 130 (Chapter 22, Statutes of 2025) establishes a moratorium from October 1, 2025, through June 1, 2031, on new or amended local building standards affecting residential occupancies (Group R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3, R-3.1, R-4, and detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses), except under limited statutory exceptions; and the City’s 2025 Building Code Ordinance carries forward—without change—all previously adopted 2022 local amendments applicable to these occupancies, thereby maintaining compliance with AB 130 while reaffirming the City’s existing findings of local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pinole does hereby adopt the following findings in conformance with its obligations under Section 17958.7 of the California Health and Safety Code:

I. The City of Pinole is subject to the following climatic, geological and topographical conditions:

A. Climatic

1. Precipitation and Relative Humidity

(a) Conditions. Precipitation ranges from 15 to 24 inches per year with an average of approximately 20 inches per year. 96% of precipitation falls during the months of October through April, and four percent from May through September. This is a dry period of at least five months each year. Additionally, the area is subject to occasional drought.

Relative humidity remains in the middle range most of the time. It ranges from 45-65% during spring, summer, fall, and from 60-90% in the winter. It occasionally falls as low as 15%.
(b) Impact. Locally experienced dry periods cause extreme dryness of untreated wood shakes and shingles on buildings and non-irrigated grass, brush, and weeds, which are often near buildings with wood roofs and sidings. Such dryness causes these materials to ignite very readily and burn rapidly and intensely.

Because of dryness, a rapidly burning grass fire or exterior building fire can quickly transfer to other buildings by means of radiation or flying brands, sparks, and embers. A small fire can rapidly grow to a magnitude beyond the control capabilities of the City Fire Department and County Fire District resulting in an excessive fire loss.

2. Temperature
(a) Conditions. Temperatures have been recorded as high as 114° F. Average summer highs are in the 90° range, with an average maximum of 105° F.
(b) Impact. High temperatures cause rapid fatigue and heat exhaustion of firefighters, thereby reducing their effectiveness and ability to control large building and wildland fires.

Another impact from high temperatures is that combustible building material and non-irrigated weeds, grass, and brush are preheated, thus causing these materials to ignite more readily and burn more rapidly and intensely. Additionally, the resultant higher temperature of the atmosphere surrounding the materials reduces the effectiveness of the water being applied to the burning materials.

This requires that more water be applied, which in turn requires more Fire Service resources in order to control a fire on a hot day. High temperatures directly contribute to the rapid growth of fires to an intensity and magnitude beyond the control capabilities of the City of Pinole Fire Department and County Fire District.

3. Winds
(a) Conditions. Prevailing winds in the area are from the south or southwest in the mornings and from the north or northwest in the afternoons.

However, winds are experienced from virtually every direction at one time or another. Velocities are generally in the 14 mph to 23 mph range, gusting to 25 to 35 mph. 40 mph winds are experienced occasionally, and winds up to 55 mph have been registered locally.

During the winter half of the year, strong, dry, gusty winds from the north move through the area for several days, creating extremely dry conditions.
(b) Impact. Winds such as those experienced locally can and do cause fires, both interior and exterior, to burn and spread rapidly. Fires involving non-irrigated weeds, grass, and brush can grow to a magnitude and be fanned to an intensity beyond the control capabilities of the Fire Department very quickly, even by relatively moderate winds. During wood shake and shingle roof fires, or exposure fires, winds can carry sparks and burning brands to other structures, thus spreading the fire and causing conflagrations. When such fires are not controlled, they can extend to nearby buildings, particularly those with untreated wood shakes or shingles. In building fires, winds can literally force fires back into the building and can create a blowtorch effect, in addition to preventing “natural” ventilation and cross-ventilation efforts.

Winds of the type experienced locally also reduce the effectiveness of exterior water streams used by the Pinole Fire and the Fire District on fires involving large interior areas of buildings, fires which have vented through windows and roofs due to inadequate built-in fire protection protection and fires involving wood shake and shingle buildings exteriors. Local winds will continue to be a definite factor towards causing major fire losses to buildings not provided with fire-resistant roof and siding materials, and buildings with inadequately separated interior areas or lacking automatic fire protection systems. National statistics frequently cite wind conditions, such as those experienced locally, as a major factor where conflagrations have occurred.

B. Geological and Topographic

1. Seismicity
a. Conditions. The City of Pinole is within Contra Costa County and is located in Seismic Risk Zone 4, which is the worst earthquake area in the United States. Buildings and other structures in Zone 4 can experience major seismic damage. Contra Costa County is in close proximity to the San Andreas Fault and contains all or portions of the Hayward, Calaveras, Concord, Antioch, Mt. Diablo, and other lesser faults. A 4.1 earthquake with its epicenter in Concord occurred in 1958, and a 5.4 earthquake with its epicenter also in Concord occurred in 1955. The Concord and Antioch faults have potential for a Richter 6 earthquake, and the Hayward and Calaveras faults have the potential

for a Richter 7 earthquake. Minor tremors from seismic activity are not uncommon in the area.

The fire environment of a community is primarily a combination of two factors: the area’s physical geologic characteristics and a historic pattern of urban-suburban development. These two factors, alone and combined, create a mixture of environments which ultimately determines the area’s fire protection needs. Contra Costa County has 3 distinct areas. They are to the West, which includes the City of San Pablo and the communities of North Richmond, El Sobrante, and East Richmond Heights: the Central, which includes the Cities of Lafayette, Martinez, Pleasant Hill, Concord, Walnut Creek, Clayton, and the communities of Clyde, Pacheco, Alhambra Valley, and Alamo; and the East, which includes the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg and the community of Bay Point. The City of Pinole falls within these risk areas.

Because of the size of Contra Costa County (304 square miles), the characteristics of the fire environment changes from one location to the next. Therefore, the County has not one, but a number of fire environments, each of which has its individual fire protection needs from two major oil refineries to heavy industrial facilities, freeways, rail lines, waterways, port facilities, wildland areas, urban and suburban town settings, and major downtown areas.

Interstates 80 and 680, State Highways 4, 24, and 242, Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) and major thoroughfares travel throughout the County. There are 2 major rail lines that run through the County. An overpass or underpass crossing collapse would alter the response route and time for responding emergency equipment. This is due to the limited crossings of the major highways and rail lines.

Earthquakes of the magnitude experienced locally can cause major damage to electrical transmission facilities, which, in turn, causes power failures while at the same time starting fires throughout the County. The occurrence of multiple fires will quickly deplete existing fire district resources; thereby reducing and/or delaying their response to any given fire. Additionally, without electrical power, elevators, smoke management systems, lighting systems, alarm systems, and other electrical equipment urgently needed for building evacuation and fire control in large buildings without emergency generator systems would be inoperative, thereby resulting in loss of life and/or major fire losses in such buildings.
b. Impact. A major earthquake could severely restrict the response of the City of Pinole’s contracted fire service (Contra Costa Fire Prevention District) and its capability to control fires involving buildings of wood frame construction, with ordinary wood shake and shingle exteriors, or

with large interior areas not provided with automatic smoke and fire control systems.

2. Soils
a. Conditions. The area is replete with various soils, which are unstable, clay loam and alluvial fans being predominant. These soil conditions are moderately to severely prone to swelling and shrinking, are plastic, and tend to liquefy.

Throughout the City and County, the topography and development growth have created a network of older, narrow roads. These roads vary from gravel to asphalt surface and vary in percent of slope, many exceeding twenty (20) percent. Several of these roads extend up through the winding passageways in the hills, providing access to remote, affluent housing subdivisions. Many of these roads are private with no established maintenance program. During inclement weather, these roads are subject to rock and mudslides, as well as downed trees, obstructing all vehicle traffic. It is anticipated that during an earthquake, several of these roads would be practically impassable.

3. Topographic
a. Conditions
i. Vegetation. The service area of the Pinole Fire Department and of Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, which surrounds Pinole has a varied topography and vegetative cover. A
conglomeration of flat lands, hills, and ridges make up the terrain.

Development has occurred on the flat lands in the County and in the past 15 years, development has spread into the hills, valleys, and ridge lands of the City and County.

Highly combustible dry grass, weeds, and brush are common in the hilly and open space areas adjacent to built-up locations six to eight months of each year. Many of these areas
frequently experience wildland fires, which threaten nearby buildings, particularly those with wood roofs or siding. This condition can be found throughout the County, especially in those fully developed areas and those areas marked for future development.
ii. Surface Features. The arrangement and location of natural and manmade surface features, including hills, creeks, canals, freeways, housing tracts, commercial development, fire stations, streets, and roads, combine to limit efficient response routes for City and County Fire resources into and through many areas. iii. Buildings, Landscaping, and Terrain. Many of the “newer” large buildings and building complexes have access and landscaping

features or designs which preclude, or greatly limit, an efficient approach or operational access to them by Fire Services vehicles. In addition, the presence of security gates, roads of inadequate width, and grades that are too steep for Fire Service vehicles create an adverse impact on fire suppression efforts.

When Fire Service vehicles cannot gain access to buildings involved with fire, the potential for complete loss is realized.

Difficulty reaching a fire site often requires additional fire personnel and resources to successfully and safely mitigate the event. Access problems often result in severely delaying, misdirecting, or making fire and smoke control efforts
unsuccessful.
b. Impact.

The above local geological and topographical conditions increase the magnitude, exposure, accessibility problems, and fire hazards presented to the City of Pinole Fire Department. Fire following an earthquake has the potential of causing greater loss of life and damage than the earthquake itself. Hazardous materials, particularly toxic gases, could pose the greatest threat to the largest number, should a significant seismic event occur. Public Safety resources would have to be prioritized to mitigate the greatest threat, and may likely be unavailable for smaller single-dwelling or structure fires.

Other variables may intensify the situation:

1. The extent of damage to the water system.

2. The extent of isolation due to bridge and/or freeway overpass collapse.

3. The extent of roadway damage and/or the amount of debris blocking the roadways.

4. Climatic conditions (hot, dry weather with high winds)

5. Time of day will influence the amount of traffic on roadways and could intensify the risk to life during normal business hours.

6. The availability of timely mutual aid or military assistance.

7. The large portion of dwellings with wood shake or shingles coverings could result in conflagrations.

C . Conclusion
Because of the conditions described above, the City of Pinole, City Council requires the increased fire protection requirements set forth in Ordinance No. 2025-XX.

The ordinance amends Chapter 1 (Scope and Administration) of the statewide Fire Code by requiring a permit for certain activities and operations that pose fire hazards. The ordinance amends Chapter 2 (Definitions) to provide clarity on wildland firefighting and

preparedness terminology. The ordinance amends Chapter 4 of the statewide Fire Code (Emergency Planning and Preparedness) to require standby EMS personnel for large events, as well as standby fire personnel, to account for the fact that the fire district is both the local fire and EMS provider. The ordinance amends the statewide Fire Code by reducing the square footage thresholds found in Chapter 9 (Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems) for installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in most commercial buildings and in private and charter schools. The definition of Substantial Addition and Alteration is also changed to align with the other fire districts for consistency in the interpretation. The ordinance amends Chapter 5 (Fire Service Features) and Appendix D (Fire Apparatus Access Roads) of the statewide Fire Code to establish requirements for fire apparatus access roads. The ordinance amends Chapter 33 (Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition) to define the additional site security requirements that could be required if deemed necessary by the building official and fire official from arson fires or hazards occurring within the jurisdiction. The ordinance also amends Chapter 50 (Hazardous Materials) and Chapter 57 (Flammable and Combustible Liquids) provides the ability to the fire official to require a risk assessment stamped by a fire protection engineer, if the facility manager is unable to provide an accurate risk assessment of the facility to include all hazardous materials stored onsite.

II. Pursuant to Sections 17958.5 and 17958.7 of the State of California Health and Safety Code, the City Council of the City of Pinole makes the finding that changes, modifications, and amendments to the 2025 Edition of the California Building Standards Codes are needed and are reasonably necessary because of certain local climatic, geologic and topographic features and conditions as described in Section I above, and that those features and conditions, under certain circumstances, affect delivery of emergency services. The amendments to the California Building Standards Codes are enacted to mitigate the impact of those local features and conditions by (i) preventing the chance of accident or injury by requiring standards more stringent than required by the current codes; and (ii) requiring additional built-in automatic fire protection systems, which will provide for early detection and initial fire control.

III. The following changes and/or modifications to the 2025 California Building Standards Code are found to be necessary to mitigate the impacts caused by the local climatic, geologic, and topographic conditions. The City of Pinole has adopted substantive changes and modifications to the California Building Standards Code as follows:

Pinole Municipal Code
Section
California Code
Section
Findings

15.02 CA Building Code, CCR Title 24,
Part 2, Volume 1, Sections: 1.8.4.2,

1.8.8,

1.8.9, 101, 105.2, A. 1., B. 14., C.,
D.,
E. 105.8, 105.8.1, 105.8.2, 105.8.3,
F
107.2.1, G. 107.6.1, H. 110.1, I.
1A, 1B, and 1C

110.6.1, J. 105.5.1, 105.6, L. Add:

Fire
Hazard (def), M. Add Pool (def), N.
amend 501.2, Chapter 5, 1., 1a, 1b,

2.,

3., 4., O. 2111.15, 1., 2. 3., P.
amend
2304.12.1.6

15.04 CA Building Code, CCR Title 24,
Part 2,
Volume 1, Sections: 105.2,
105.2.14,
105.3.2, 105.5, 105.8, 105.8.1,
105.8.2,
105.8.3, 107.2.1, 107.6.1.8.8
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.06 CA Residential Code, CCR Title 24,
Part 2.5, Sections: 202 Definitions:

Add
Pool, amend 506.1, Add subsection
902.1.5, ACI 322
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.08 CA Green Building Standards
Code,
CCR Title 24, Part 11, Section: Add
101.3.2
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.10 CA Electrical Code, CCR Title 24,
Part
3, Adoption by reference, no
changes.
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.12 CA Plumbing Code, CCR Title 24,
Part 5, Section: Add 604.14,
Amend/Add 710.1
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.14 CA Mechanical Code, CCR Title
24, Part 4, Adoption by reference,
no changes.
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.16 CA Housing and Property
Maintenance Code, IPMC
amended 102.3, IPMC
amended 304.14, IPMC amended
307.3.1, amend 308.3.1, IPMC
amend 602.4 with exceptions 1,2.
1A, 1B, and 1C

15.18 1997 Uniform Code for the
Abatement
of Dangerous Buildings as adopted
by the International Conference of
Building
A, 1B, and 1C

Officials, amend Section: 801.2,
amend
912
CA Administrative Code, CCR Title
24,
Part 1, Add: Copying and imaging
fees
as reflected by the City’s Master
Fee
Schedule.

A, 1B, and 1C
CA Building Codes, section 114
and
2021 IPMC amend section 109.3,
amend 109.4, A.1.2.3.4., B, C,
amend
114.4
A, 1B, and 1C
The aforementioned amendments have been incorporated in detail into an Ordinance 2025-XX
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pinole finds that the local amendments carried forward from the 2022 California Building Standards Codes are consistent with the requirements of Assembly Bill 130 (Chapter 22, Statutes of 2025), which restricts new or amended local building standards affecting residential occupancies, and that the City’s action to revalidate and readopt its existing local amendments complies with State law; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby directs City staff to file a copy of this Resolution, together with the adopted ordinance and findings, with the California Building Standards Commission and the Department of Housing and Community Development as required by Health and Safety Code Section 17958.7 and related statutes.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Pinole City Council held on the 18th day of November, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

I, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced, passed, and adopted on this 18th day of November, 2025.

______________________________________
Heather Spears, CMC
City Clerk

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-XX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTERS 15.02 THROUGH 15.24 AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 15.26 OF TITLE 15 “BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION,” OF THE

PINOLE MUNICIPAL CODE IN ORDER TO ADOPT BY REFERENCE, WITH MODIFICATIONS TO ADDRESS UNIQUE LOCAL CONDITIONS, THE 2025

EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE CALIFORNIA

BUILDING CODE, THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, THE CALIFORNIA

ELECTRICAL CODE, THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, THE CALIFORNIA

PLUMBING CODE, THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, THE CALIFORNIA FIRE

CODE, THE CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE, THE

CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE, THE CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING

STANDARDS CODE,REFERENCED STANDARDS, AND INTERNATIONAL

PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
WHEREAS, the California Building Standards Commission has adopted a new Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also referred to as the 2025 California Building Standards Code, that will become effective statewide on January 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, currently Title 15 “Buildings and Construction, I. Adoption of Uniform Code” of the City of Pinole Municipal Code adopted the building standards contained in the 2022 versions of the California Building Code, the California Residential Code, the California Fire Code, the California Green Building Standards Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Mechanical Code, and the California Electrical Code, California Administrative Code, as such Codes are approved by the State Building Standards Commission (collectively, the “California Building Standards Code”); and
WHEREAS, the updated California Building Standards Code becomes effective within the City on January 1, 2025, and Title 15 is updated by default to incorporate the California Building Standards Code without local amendments; and
WHEREAS, Section 17922 of the California Health and Safety Code requires local agencies to adopt the building standards contained in the California Building Standards Code; and
WHEREAS, Section 17958.7 of the California Health and Safety Code authorizes cities to adopt local modifications to the California Building Standards Code when such modifications are reasonably necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions, provided that the governing body adopts findings supporting those conditions; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 130 (Chapter 22, Statutes of 2025) establishes a moratorium from October 1, 2025, through June 1, 2031 on new or amended local building standards affecting residential occupancies (Group R-1, R-2, R-2.1, R-2.2, R-3, R-3.1, R-4, and detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses), except under limited statutory exceptions such as previously filed local amendments, emergency standards necessary to protect health and

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 safety, home-hardening measures, or amendments implementing an adopted greenhouse-gas reduction strategy consistent with a general plan approved on or before June 10, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City of Pinole’s 2025 Building Code Ordinance carries forward— without change—all previously adopted 2022 local amendments affecting such residential occupancies, thereby complying with AB 130 while reaffirming the City’s existing findings of local climatic, geological, and topographical conditions that remain valid and necessary for community safety; and
WHEREAS, the ordinance also readopts the City’s existing non-residential and administrative amendments and incorporates by reference the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District’s local fire-code amendments adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code § 13869.7, and the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, which are not subject to the AB 130 moratorium; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was advertised as required by applicable law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that no additional environmental review is necessary because this Ordinance is not a project that has the potential to cause substantial or potentially substantial, adverse change in the environment and qualifies for an exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3), and further, the Ordinance establishes standards for the approval of ministerial projects that are not themselves subject to CEQA review; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the adoption of the 2025 Edition of the California Administrative, Building, Residential, Green Building Standards, Energy, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Existing Building, Fire, Reference Standards and related construction Codes help protect public health, safety, and welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE DOES ORDAIN as follows:

SECTION 1. The forgoing Recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Those certain documents, copies of which are on file and are open for inspection by the public at the Building Division of the City of Pinole, being marked and designated as the California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 1, Part 2 Volumes 1 and 2, Part 2.5, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12 together with all appendices thereto; each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions, and terms of the International Property Maintenance Code all of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby referred to, adopted and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this ordinance.

SECTION 3. Chapters 15.02, 15.04, 15.06, 15.08, 15.10, 15.12, 15.14, 15.16, 15.18, 15.20, and

15.22, 15.24 of Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Pinole Municipal Code are hereby

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 repealed and replaced in its entirety, and a new Chapter 15.26 is added, as provided in Exhibit A and Exhibit B.

SECTION 4. References To Prior Uniform Building and Construction Codes. Unless superseded and expressly repealed, references in City forms, documents, and regulations to chapters and sections of the prior adopted Uniform Building Codes shall be construed to apply to the corresponding provisions contained in the chapters and sections of Title 15 of the Pinole Municipal Code adopted by this Ordinance and all other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby superseded and expressly repealed.

SECTION 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid.

SECTION 6. Adoption. This Ordinance shall take effect on the later of thirty (30) days after passage or January 1, 2026, whichever occurs later, and shall within fifteen (15) days after passage, be posted in accordance with Section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California with the names of these City Council members voting for and against it.

THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the Pinole City Council on the 21st day of October, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________________________
Cameron Sasai, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Heather Spears, CMC
City Clerk

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.02

GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sections:

15.02.010 Title.

15.02.020 Organization.

15.02.030 Codes adopted by reference.

15.02.040 Expiration of permits.

15.02.050 Premises identification numbering.

15.02.060 Construction permit fees - set by City Council.

15.02.070 Permitted hours and condition of construction, penalties.

15.02.080 Misrepresentations in permit application.

15.02.090 Disconnection of utility service.

15.02.010 TITLE.

Chapters 15.02 through 15.24 shall be known as the "City of Pinole Building Codes" and shall be cited as such.

15.02.020 ORGANIZATION.

A building division is established in accordance with the provisions of California Building Code, 2022 Edition, adopted in Chapter 15.04. This division shall be a part of and shall operate under the direction of the Community Development Director. The building division is authorized to direct and enforce all the provisions of this Title and any of the Codes adopted in this Title.

15.02.030 CODES ADOPTED BY REFERENCE.

For the purpose of establishing proper regulations for building construction, maintenance of housing standards, installation of electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems and swimming pool construction, the codes specifically listed in Chapters 15.02 through 15.22, except as modified in this Title, are adopted and made a part of this Title by reference, without publishing or posting thereof, and copies of each of these Codes as listed in this Title are now on file for use and examination by the public in the office of the City Clerk.

15.02.040 EXPIRATION OF PERMITS.

All permits issued by the building division shall expire one hundred eighty (180) calendar days from date of issuance if the work is not commenced within this time (except as noted in the 2025 CBC Section 105.5.1. and the 2025 CRC Section R105.5.1).

15.02.050 PREMISES IDENTIFICATION NUMBERING.

A. Every main structure or building constructed, altered, repaired or moved into the City shall be assigned a street address identification number by the Building Official and approved by the Fire Code Official (as defined in 15.04.030 of this Code).

B. Identification numbers shall be placed on the street side of the building or structure in such a manner as to be plainly visible from the street or public way. Identification numbers shall be a minimum of 6" in height and of a color to contrast with the surrounding color. Numbers shall be installed prior to final inspection and occupancy of the building or structure.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 C. The premises street address shall be internally or externally illuminated to the satisfaction of the Building Official and Fire Code Official.

D. The owner or his or her designated agent shall be responsible for the maintenance of identification numbers.

E. Any changes to the assigned street identification numbers must be approved by the Building Official and Fire Code Official.

F. The fee for assigning or modifying a street address shall be set by resolution of the City Council.

15.02.060 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEES - SET BY COUNCIL.

All construction permit fees including building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, swimming pools and solar shall be set by resolution of the City Council and reflected in the City's Master Fee Schedule.

15.02.070 PERMITTED HOURS AND CONDITION OF CONSTRUCTION; PENALTIES.

A. Work is allowed from seven a.m. (7:00 a.m.) to five p.m. (5:00 p.m.) Monday through Friday. Work is allowed, but no inspections will be performed on non-federal holidays, which are holidays that are not acknowledged federally but are recognized by the City of Pinole. These holidays include, but are not limited to, Cesar Chavez's Birthday and the Day After Thanksgiving.

B. Saturday work is allowed in commercial zones only, from nine a.m. (9:00 a.m.) to six p.m. (6:00 p.m.), if it is interior work and does not generate significant noise.

C. Exceptions for residential property owners.

1. Homeowners performing additions, repairs, or remodeling are allowed to work on their residences on weekends and holidays between nine a.m. (9:00 a.m.) and five p.m. (5:00 p.m.).

2. By written authorization of the Building Official, a residential property owner with a valid permit to construct a single-family residence for personal occupancy shall be allowed to work on weekends and holidays between nine a.m. (9:00 a.m.) and five p.m. (5:00 p.m.). This authorization shall be granted to applicants who have not built a residence in the City in the previous five (5) year period and who affirm in writing their intention to reside at the subject property.

D. Exceptions for Construction. The City Council designates the City Manager (or their designee) to further modify on a case-by-case basis the hours of construction, to allow for work beyond those hours allowed in 15.02.070.A-C regardless of zoning district.

E. The minimum fine for a citation or penalty for violating construction hours is one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and escalates in one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) increments.

F. Work must be controlled to prevent causing a public nuisance due to dust, noise, vibrations, and the like.

15.02.080 MISREPRESENTATIONS IN PERMIT APPLICATION.

No person shall make false statement or misrepresentation in or in connection with an application for a permit under this Title. Any permit issued under this Title may be revoked or suspended at any time by the Building Official or designee for fraud, misrepresentation or false

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 statement contained in an application for a permit, or for violations of this Title in connection with work done under the permit.

15.02.090 DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICE.

The Building Official (or designee) may shut off or disconnect any or all utility service to any structure or facility or to any electrical conductor or apparatus which he/she finds to be in violation of any state or county law or regulation relating thereto or to the public health, safety, or welfare, or he may order this done. If he/she finds that the violation involves an immediate danger to person(s) or to other properties or to the public health, safety or welfare, he/she may have the action taken as quickly as he/she deems necessitated by the danger; otherwise he/she shall give ten (10) days advance notice thereof by mail to the utility and the owner of the property as shown on the last assessment roll and by conspicuously posting notice of his orders and the action taken, which no person shall remove, tamper with or disobey. He/she shall rescind or modify such action when it becomes proper to do so in view of the danger or violation.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.04

BUILDING CODE
Sections:

15.04.010 Adoption by reference.

15.04.020 Copies on file.

15.04.030 Amendments made in the California Building Code.

15.04.010 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.

The 2025 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 2, Volume 1 of 2 and Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, including the 2025 California Historic Building Code, Title 24, Part 8 and the 2025 California Existing Building Code, Title 24, Part Chapter 10, and all Appendices is adopted by reference, the same as though fully set forth in this chapter.

15.04.020 COPIES ON FILE.

One copy of the California Building Code and Appendices as adopted by the Pinole Municipal Code 15.04.010, and all amendments thereto, shall be kept on file in the Building Division for inspection by the public.

15.04.030 AMENDMENTS MADE IN THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE.

The California Building Code is amended and changed in the following respects:

A. Section 105.2 (Work Exempt from Permit) of the CBC Chapter 1 subsection 1 is amended to read as follows:

1. One-story detached accessory buildings used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses, and similar uses, provided that the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet (11.15 m 2),
and for which written approval has been given by the Planning Division. These structures may still be regulated by Section 710A, despite exemption from permit.

B. Section 105.2 (Work Exempt from Permit) of the CBC Chapter 1 is hereby amended adding subsection 14 to read as follows:

14. Detached decks under 100 square feet and under 30 inches in height, for which written approval has been given by the Planning Division and the Building Division.

C. Section 105.3.2 of Chapter 1, Division II is amended to read as follows:

An application for a permit for any proposed work shall be deemed to have been abandoned six (6) months after the date of filing unless such application has been pursued in good faith, or a permit has been issued; except that the building official is authorized to grant one or more extensions of up to six (6) months. The extensions shall be requested in

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 writing and justified cause demonstrated. Whatever the case, a permit application is valid for a maximum of one (1) year after which time the application expires, and a new plan review fee must be paid. The code in effect at the time the newest application is made shall be the code that is enforced.

D. Chapter 1 Subsection 105.8 is added to the CBC, to read as follows:
105.8 Permit Issuance.
105.8.1 Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, a permit shall be issued only to a person holding a valid, unexpired, or unrevoked California building contractor's license, property owner, or authorized agent.
105.8.2 A permit may be issued for work in a single-family dwelling used exclusively for living purposes, including any accessory buildings, if the permittee is the bona fide owner of the structure occupied by or designed to be occupied by the owner, in which case the owner himself fulfills the role of contractor for all work under the permit. 105.8.3 Any permit issued pursuant to this Chapter shall not be transferable to any person, business, or corporation.

E. Section 107.2.1 (Information on Construction Documents) of CBC Chapter 1 is amended to read:
107.2.1 Construction documents shall include dimensions and shall be drawn to scale on suitable material. Electronic media documents may be submitted when approved in advance by the building official. Construction documents shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature, and extent of the work proposed and to show in detail that it will conform to this code and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. The first sheet of each set of plans shall give the location and street address of the work and the name and address of the owner and of the person who prepared the plans. Plans shall include a plot plan showing all existing property lines labeled and fully dimensioned, the elevation of the top and toe of cuts and fills, and the location of the proposed building with distance to all property lines and of every existing building on the property. Instead of detailed specifications, the city building official may approve references on the plans to a specific section or part of this code, or other ordinances or laws. All pages to be signed and/ or professionally stamped
F. Chapter 1 Division II Subsection 107.6 (Standard plans) is added to read as follows:
107.6.1 - Standard plans. The building official may approve a set of plans for a building or structure as a "standard plan," provided the applicant has made proper application, submitted complete sets of plans, and paid the plan checking fee as required by the City of Pinole. When it is desired to use an approved "standard plan" for an identical structure, three plot plans shall be submitted, and a plan-checking fee equal to one-half of the full plan-checking fee required by the City of Pinole shall be paid at the time application is made for such identical structure. Such duplicate plans shall be compared, stamped, and kept on the job as required by California Building Code Section [A] 107.3.1. In case of

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 any deviation whatsoever from this standard plan, complete plans, together with a full plan-checking fee, shall be submitted for the proposed work, as required by California Building Code Section [A] 107. Standard plans shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of approval. This period may be extended by the building official when there is evidence that the plan may be used again. The code in effect when the plan review application is submitted, and the plan review fee paid shall be the governing code.

G. Section 110.1 (Inspections - General) is amended by adding the following to the end of the section:

At the time of first inspection by the city building official, a licensed land surveyor or a civil engineer may be required to certify in writing that the structure is placed according to the approved set of plans. The written certification must include the site address and permit number. This requirement does not apply to alterations or repairs to existing structures that do not affect the exterior limits of the existing structures.

H. Section 110.6.1 (Approval required) is added to read as follows:
110.6.1 The Building Official of the City of Pinole is authorized to develop a covered/concealed construction policy for any covered or concealed construction, without prior building inspection, to be opened to ensure compliance with the California Building codes. The policy shall encourage the utilization of the least invasive deconstruction methods as possible to document construction methods used, such as photographs, invoices, and structural engineer/architectural engineer reports.

I. Chapter 1, Section [A] 114 (Unlawful act). Chapter 1, Division II Section 114.5 Violation a Public Nuisance is added to read as follows:

It is declared that any violation of this code, the CPC, CMC, CEC, or other state building codes constitute a public nuisance. In addition to any other remedies this code provides for enforcement, the city may bring civil suit to enjoin the violation of its provisions.

J. Section 202 of Chapter 2 (Definitions) is deleted in its entirety.

K. Section 202 of Chapter 2 (Definitions) of the CBC is amended to include the following definition:

Fire Hazard: is any building device, appliance, apparatus, equipment, tank, vehicle, combustible material or waste, fence, or vegetation which, in the opinion of the City building official or the Fire Chief, is in such condition as to cause a fire or explosion, or to augment the spread and intensity of a fire or explosion arising from any cause.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 L. Section 202 of Chapter 2 (Definitions) is amended to add the following definition to the existing definition:

Pool: Any outside body of water created by artificial means, any portion of which exceeds eighteen inches (18") in depth
M. Section 501.2 of Chapter 5 (General building heights and areas) is amended to read as follows:

1. Address numbers. Apartment, Condominium, and Townhouse Complexes - An illuminated, diagrammatic representation of the complex shall be installed at the primary
vehicular and walkway entrance to each complex. This diagram shall be of sufficient size
to be easily visible from said vehicular and walkway entrance. a. An apartment, condominium, or townhouse complex shall be defined as a group of three or more separate, non-connected buildings, all located on common ground, where each building contains two or more living units.
b. Each building shall be marked at a location clearly visible from the nearest vehicular access with the street address, building number/letter and the number of units located in that building. Example: 2237 Address Bldg. "B" Building designation Units 1 - 8 Units in building. Minimum numeral size shall be 6" high with a stroke of 1" and shall contrast with the background.

2. Commercial - Individual units shall be addressed front and back. Minimum numeral size shall be 6" high with a stroke of 1" and shall contrast with the background. Units with entrances on both the front and rear of the building shall have identical addresses at both locations.

3. Industrial - Individual units within a building shall be addressed front and back.

Individual buildings shall be marked at a point clearly visible from the street. Minimum numeral size shall be 12" high with a 3" wide stroke and shall contrast with the background. Units with entrances on both the front and rear of the building shall have identical addresses at both locations.

4. Lighting of building addresses - The building address for all new buildings constructed after the date of this ordinance shall be automatically lit at night.

N. Subsection 2111.15 (Wood burning stove appliances) is added to Chapter 21 (Masonry) of the California Building Code to read as follows:

Wood-burning stove appliances. Any new wood-burning appliance must be one of the following:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 1. A pellet-fueled wood device.

2. A U. S. EPA Phase II certified device; or 340 of 677

3. A low mass fireplace, masonry heater, or other wood-burning device of a make and model that meets EPA emission targets and has been approved in writing by the air pollution control officer of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District or the designee thereof.

O. Subsection 2304.12.1.6 of the CBC is amended to add the following sentence at the end thereof:

Siding Materials: Wood shingles or shakes shall be Class B or better, which comply with ASTM E108 or UL 790, except that in very high fire hazard severity zones, no wood shake or shingle siding shall be permitted regardless of class designation. See Section 1505.1.1 of the California Building Code for roofing standards in very high fire hazard severity zones

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.06

RESIDENTIAL CODE
Sections:

15.06.010 Adoption by reference.

15.06.020 Copies on file.

15.06.030 Amendments made in the California Residential Code.

15.06.010 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.

The 2025 California Residential Building Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part

2.5, including all Appendices, is adopted by reference, the same as though fully set forth in this chapter.

15.06.020 COPIES ON FILE.

One copy of the California Residential Code and Appendices as adopted by Pinole Municipal Code 15.02.010, and all amendments thereto, shall be kept on file in the Building Division for inspection by the public.

15.06.030 AMENDMENTS MADE IN THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE.

The California Residential Code is amended and changed in the following respects:

A. Section R202 of Chapter 2 (Definitions) is amended to add the existing pool definition to read as follows:

Pool: Any outside body of water created by artificial means, any portion of which exceeds eighteen inches (18") in depth.

B. Subsection R902.1.5 is added to Chapter 9 (Roof Assemblies) of the California Residential Code to read as follows:

All new roof coverings shall be a Class B or better roof covering assembly as defined by CBC 1505.3

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.08

CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE
Sections:

15.08.010 Adoption by reference.

15.08.020 Copies on file.

15.08.030 Amendments made in the California Green Building Standards Code.

15.08.010 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.

The 2025 California Green Building Standards Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 11, including all Appendices, is adopted by reference the same as though fully set forth in this chapter.

15.08.020 COPIES ON FILE.

One copy of the California Green Building Standards Code and Appendices as adopted by Pinole Municipal Code 15.08.010, and all amendments thereto, shall be kept on file in the Building Division for inspection by the public.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.10

CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
Sections:

15.10.010 Adoption by reference.

15.10.020 Copy on file.

15.10.010 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.

The 2025 California Electrical Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 3, including all Appendices is adopted by reference, the same as though fully set forth in this chapter.

15.10.020 COPY ON FILE.

One copy of the California Electrical Code and Appendices as adopted by Pinole Municipal Code 15.10.010, and all amendments thereto, shall be kept on file in the Building Division for inspection by the public.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.12

CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
Sections:

15.12.010 Adoption by reference.

15.12.020 Copy on file.

15.12.030 Amendments made in the California Plumbing Code.

15.12.010 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.

The 2025 California Plumbing Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 5, including all Appendices is adopted by reference, the same as though fully set forth in this chapter.

15.12.020 COPY ON FILE.

One copy of the 2025 California Plumbing Code and Appendices as adopted by Pinole Municipal Code 15.12.010, and all amendments thereto, shall be kept on file in the Building Division for inspection by the public.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.14

CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
Sections:

15.14.010 Adoption by reference.

15.14.020 Copies on file.

15.14.010 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE.

The 2025 California Mechanical Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 4, including all Appendices is adopted by reference, the same as though fully set forth in this chapter.

15.14.020 COPIES ON FILE.

One copy of the California Mechanical Code and Appendices as adopted by the Pinole Municipal Code 15.14.010, and all amendments thereto, shall be kept on file in the Building Division for inspection by the public.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.16

CALIFORNIA HOUSING AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE
Sections:

15.16.010 Housing and Property Maintenance Code - Adoption.

15.16.020 IPMC 102.3 Amended - Application of other codes.

15.16.030 IPMC 304.14 Amended - Insect screens.

15.16.040 IPMC 308.3.1 Amended - Disposal of garbage.

15.16.050 IPMC 602.4 Amended - Occupied work spaces.

15.16.060 House moving.

15.16.070 Compliance with construction requirements.

15.16.010 HOUSING AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE - ADOPTION.

The Housing and Property Maintenance Code for the City is the California Housing Law Regulations as set forth in Division 13, Part 1.5, commencing with Section 17910, in the Health and Safety Code (as amended) combined with the 2021 International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) except as amended by the changes, additions and deletions set forth in this Chapter.

15.16.020 IPMC 102.3 AMENDED - APPLICATION OF OTHER CODES.

Section 102.3 of the IPMC is amended to read as follows:

Repairs, additions or alterations to a structure, or changes of occupancy, shall be done in accordance with the procedures and provisions of the City Municipal Code and the California Building Codes.

15.16.030 IPMC 304.14 AMENDED - INSECT SCREENS.

Section 304.14 of the IPMC is amended as follows:

During the entire year, every door, window and other outside opening required for ventilation of habitable rooms, food preparation areas, food service areas or any areas where products to be included or utilized in food for human consumption are processed, manufactured, packaged or stored shall be supplied with approved tightly fitting screens of minimum 16 mesh per inch (16 mesh per 25 mm), and every screen door used for insect control shall have a self-closing device in good working condition.

Exception: Screens shall not be required where other approved means, such as air curtains or insect repellent fans, are employed.

15.16.040 IPMC 308.3.1 AMENDED - DISPOSAL OF GARBAGE.

Section 308.3.1 of the IPMC is amended as follows:

That portion of the sentence reading "an approved incinerator unit in the structure available to the occupants in each dwelling unit" shall be deleted in its entirety.

15.16.050 IPMC 602.4 AMENDED - OCCUPIED WORK SPACES.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Section 602.4 of the IPMC is amended as follows:

Indoor occupiable workspaces shall be supplied with heat during the entire year to maintain a temperature of not less than 65°F (18°C) during the period the spaces are occupied.

Exceptions:

1. Processing, storage and operation areas that require cooling or special temperature conditions.

2. Areas in which persons are primarily engaged in vigorous physical activities.

15.16.060 HOUSE MOVING.

A. Any person, firm, or corporation wishing to move any house or structure on any public street or way in the city shall first obtain a permit as provided in this section.

B. House moving, as permitted in this section, is allowed only on the day and hours as stated on the permit and on the routes as approved by the director of public works and the chief of police.

C. The building department may issue a permit for house moving when the person, firm or corporation has applied for such permit and has complied with the following:

1. A special pre-moving inspection of the building has been made and approved.

2. Posted a performance bond in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000) payable to the city.

3. Provided a certificate of insurance for public and auto liability of not less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) bodily injury; and twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) property damage.

4. Payment of a permit fee of fifty dollars ($50) for each day or part thereof in which the moving operation will take place.

5. Agree to furnish adequate traffic control. Method and number of persons directing traffic must be approved by the chief of police.

6. Agree to pay the cost of any police and fire protection which may be required. A deposit of fifty dollars ($50) is required.

7. Provide a copy of signed agreement with the public utilities as to date, time, and route.

8. Post a time schedule with the public services department, building department and police department at least twenty-four hours in advance of any actual move.

15.16.070 COMPLIANCE WITH CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS.

Buildings moved into or relocated within the city shall be made to comply with the requirements for new construction in the codes adopted in this Title

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.18

ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
Section

15.18.010 Abatement of dangerous buildings - Adoption.

15.18.020 Section 801.3 Amended - Costs.

15.18.030 Section 912 Amended - Cost Recovery.

15.18.010 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS - ADOPTION.

The abatement of dangerous buildings code for the City is the 1997 Uniform Code For The Abatement of Dangerous Buildings as adopted and printed by the International Conference of Building Officials.

15.18.020 SECTION 801.3 AMENDED - COSTS.

Section 801 of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to read as follows:
801.2 Costs. The cost of such work shall be paid from the General Fund and may be made a special assessment against the property involved or may be made a personal obligation of the property owner.

15.18.030 SECTION 912 AMENDED - COST RECOVERY.

Section 912 of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings is hereby amended to read as follows:
912. All money recovered by payment of the charge or assessment or from the sale of the property at foreclosure sale shall be paid to the Finance Director of the City, who shall credit the same to the General Fund

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Chapter 15.20

FIRE CODE
Section

15.20.010 Fire Code - Adoption.

15.20.020 Establishment and duties of bureau of fire prevention.

15.20.030 Amendments to the California Fire Code.

15.20.040 Appeals.

15.20.050 New materials, processes or occupancies which may require permits.

15.20.060 Violation – Penalty.

15.20.010 FIRE CODE - ADOPTION.

The City of Pinole hereby adopts the 2025 California Fire Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part, 9 [based on the 2024 International Fire Code published by the International Code Council]), including Chapters 1-10 and 12-80, Appendix B, Appendix C, Appendix D, Appendix F, Appendix H, Appendix I, Appendix J, and Appendix K, as amended by the changes, additions, and deletions set forth in this Chapter. The 2025 California Fire Code, with the changes, additions, and deletions set forth in this Chapter, is adopted by this reference as though fully set forth in this Chapter. As of the effective date of this Chapter, the provisions of the fire code are controlling and enforceable within the limits of each jurisdiction.

15.20.020 ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.

The 2025 California Fire Code as adopted and amended in this Chapter, shall be enforced by the bureau of fire prevention of the Pinole Fire Department which is established and which shall be operated under the Chief of the Fire Department.

15.20.030 AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE.

A. Chapter 1. Scope and Administration.

Chapter 1 is adopted in its entirety except as amended below:
101.1 Title. This code is the Fire Code of City of Pinole and is hereinafter referred to as "this code."

Section 102.1 is amended to add item 5, to read:

5. Where not otherwise limited by law, the provisions of this code shall apply to vehicles, ships, and boats that are permanently affixed to a specific location within the boundaries of this jurisdiction.

Section 105.5 is amended to read:
105.5 Required operational permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue operational permits for the operations set forth in Chapter 1, Sections 105.5.1 through 105.5.63.

Section 105.5.33 is amended to read:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 105.5.33 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities. An operational permit is required for the operation of automotive, marine, and fleet motor fuel dispensing facilities, including for sites that allow mobile fueling from a service provider to the general public, fueling of motor vehicles at approved locations from a tank vehicle and limited or temporary fueling operations for special events (fueling of watercraft from shore, piers, floats, or barges).

Section 105.5.40 is amended to read:
105.5.40 Cannabis/Plant Extraction Related System(s)/Operations. An operational permit is required for any of the following cannabis/plant extraction related systems operations.

1. Cultivation

2. Plant Extraction Systems

3. Testing/Lab

4. Manufacturing

5. Distribution

6. Carbon Dioxide Systems or volatile solvent

Section 105.5 is amended to read:
105.5.52 Wood products. An operational permit is required to store chips, hogged material, wood or other combustible pallets, lumber or plywood in excess of 200 cubic feet (6 m3).

Section 105.5 is amended by adding Sections 105.5.55 through 105.5.63 to read:
105.5.55 Asbestos removal. A permit is required to conduct asbestos-removal operations regulated by Section 3319.
105.5.56 Automobile Wrecking or Dismantling Yard. An operation permit is, required for all automobile wrecking yards, automobile dismantling operations, and similar operations.
105.5.57 Christmas tree sales. A permit is required to use a property for the purpose of selling cut Christmas trees.
105.5.58 Firework aerial display. A permit is required to conduct a firework display regulated by California Code of Regulations, Title 19 and Chapter 56 of this code. 105.5.59 Model rockets. A permit is required to sell model rocket motors or launch model rockets pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Article

17. Permits issued in accordance with this section are for the site, and are effective as long as site conditions have not changed.
105.5.60 Section 105.5.60 is added to read:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 105.5.60 Five year sprinkler test. An operational permit is required to engage in the business of conducting the five-year test of an automatic fire sprinkler systems or standpipe, in accordance with NFPA 25 (Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems), 2013 California Edition.

Section 105.6 is amended to read:
105.5 Required construction permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue construction permits for the operations set forth in Chapter 1, Sections 105.6.1 through 105.6.25.

Section 105.6 is amended by adding Sections 105.6.26 through 105.6.30 to read:
105.5.61 Temporary water supply. A permit is required to use a temporary water supply for construction of residential projects or subdivisions pursuant to Section 3313.1. 105.5.62 Tire storage. A permit is required to store more than 1,000 cubic feet (28.3 m3) of tires inside buildings pursuant to Chapter 34.
105.5.63 Indoor Growing Operation. A permit is required to operate an indoor growing operation.

Exception: Agricultural Greenhouses in an agricultural zone.

Section 105.6 is amended to read:
105.6 Required construction permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue construction permits for the operations set forth in Chapter 1, Sections 105.6.1 through 105.6.29.

Section 105.6 is amended by adding Sections 105.6.25 through 105.6.29 to read:
105.6.26 Access for fire apparatus. Plans shall be submitted, and a permit is required to install, improve, modify, or remove public or private roadways, driveways, and bridges for which Fire District access is required by the Fire Code. 105.6.27 Construction, Substantial Alteration, Additions of a building for which a building permit is required. Plans shall be submitted to the fire code official for all land developments or for the construction, substantial alteration, additions, or renovation of a building within the jurisdiction where a building permit is required.

Exception: Non-sprinklered Group R-3 Occupancies where work does not involve a substantial addition or substantial alteration.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 105.6.28 Land Development, Subdivisions. Plans shall be submitted to the fire code official for all land developments or improvements proposed within the jurisdiction that involve the subdivision of land.
105.6.29 Water supply for fire protection. Plans shall be submitted to the fire code official for the purpose of determining whether adequate water supplies, fire hydrants, and associated systems are provided for all facilities, buildings, or portions of buildings either constructed or moved into the City pursuant to Section 507. 105.6.30 Land Development. Plans shall be submitted to the fire code official for all land developments or improvements proposed within the jurisdiction.

Section 105.7 is added, to read:
105.7 Responsibility of permittee. Construction permits shall be presumed by the Fire District, Fire Department to incorporate all of the work that the applicant or the applicant's agent, employees, or contractors shall carry out. Work performed shall be in accordance with the approved plans and with all requirements of this code and any other laws or regulations applicable thereto. No City approval shall relieve or exonerate any person from the responsibility of complying with the provisions of this code nor shall any vested rights be created for any work performed in violation of this code.

Section 112.4 is amended to read:
112.4 Violation penalties. Every person who violates any provision of this fire code is guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 13871 and Government Code Section 53069.4. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation or permit to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each ten (10) days that prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. The application of the aforesaid penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.

B. Chapter 2. Definitions.

Section 202 is amended by adding the following definitions to that section:

Administrator. Shall mean the Fire Chief.

Aerial Pre-Plans. An overhead layout of a parcel that contains structure(s) that identifies specific first responder related items to assist in effectively managing incidents and events for the protection of occupants, responding personnel, property, and the environment. The preplan shall be developed in accordance with a format approved by the AHJ. Preplan symbols shall comply with AHJ or the latest edition of NFPA 170 (Standard for Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols), and NFPA 1620 (Standard for PreIncident Planning).

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 All-weather driving surface. A roadway with a minimum surface finish that is designed to carry the imposed weight loads of fire apparatus.

Automobile Dismantling or Wrecking Yard. The operation of dismantling or removing parts from salvaged vehicles including engines or engine parts.

Wrecking Yard. An area that stores or dismantles salvaged vehicles.

Board of Directors. The City of Pinole City Council is the governing body of the City of Pinole Fire Department.

Board of Fire Commissioners. The City of Pinole City Council is the governing body of the City of Pinole Fire Department.

Combustible Material. Rubbish, litter or material of any kind other than hazardous vegetation that is combustible and endangers the public safety by creating a fire hazard as determined by the fire code official.

Defensible Space. The area adjacent to a structure or dwelling as determined by the fire code official where wildfire prevention or protection practices are implemented to provide the key point of defense from an approaching wildfire or to minimize the spread of a structure fire to wildlands or surrounding areas.

Driveway. A private roadway that provides access to no more than two (2) single-family dwellings.

Fire Apparatus Access Road. A road that provides fire apparatus access from a fire station to a facility, building or portion thereof. This is a general term that includes, but is not limited to a fire lane, public street, private street, driveway, parking lot lane, and access roadway.

Fire Code Official. The Fire Chief or a duly authorized representative, or other person as may be designated by law, appointment or delegation and charged with the administration and enforcement of this code.

Firebreak. A continuous strip of land upon and from which all combustible material hazardous vegetation or other growth has been removed to bare mineral soil to stop or prevent the extension of fire from one area to another.

Fire Trail. A graded firebreak of sufficient width, surface, and design to provide access for personnel and equipment to suppress and to assist in preventing a surface extension of fires. Must be able to support the safe travel of a Type 3 Fire Apparatus.

Fuel Break. A strategically located block or strip, on which a cover of dense, heavy, or combustible vegetation has been changed to one of lower fuel volume or reduced

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 combustibility, as an aid to fire control. Fuel breaks require annual and recurring maintenance.

Hazardous Vegetation. Vegetation that is combustible and endangers the public safety by creating a fire hazard including but not limited to seasonal and recurrent grasses, weeds, stubble, brush, dry leaves, dry needles, dead, dying or diseased trees and any other vegetation as determined by the fire code official.

Key Box or Knox Box. (Underwriters Laboratory) UL "Listed" box, size and style, approved by the Fire Code Official or designee that meets the requirements and uses the same security key code adopted by the Fire Department
Ladder Fuel. Fuel that provides vertical continuity between surface fuel and canopy fuel strata, increasing the likelihood that fire will carry from surface fuel into the crowns of shrubs and trees.

Nuisance Fire Alarm. The activation of any fire protection or alarm system which results in the response of the Fire District and is caused by malfunction, improper maintenance, negligence, or misuse of the system by an owner, occupant, employee, or agent, or any other activation not caused by excessive heat, smoke, fire, or similar activating event.

Ornamental Landscaping. Decorative plants growing within a tended garden or yard which are appropriately irrigated, maintained and located to provide aesthetic decoration and functional utility, such as privacy screening, shade, weed suppression and erosion control. The use of fire-resistant plants and the removal of fire hazardous vegetation will enhance fire safety.

Person. Includes any agency of the county, city, district or other local public agency and any individual, firm, association, partnership, business trust, corporations, limited liability company, or company.

Public Nuisance. A declaration by the fire code official that the presence of combustible materials on any parcel creates a fire hazard or threat to public safety (Health and Safety Code 14875 and 14876) or any violation of this code.

Priority Hazard Zone. An area where the threat from wildfire is severe due to proximity to open space, topography, degree of space, density of homes and/or amount of vegetation (native and ornamental), and/or other conditions favorable to fast moving fires.

Response Time. The elapsed time from receipt of call to the arrival of the first unit on scene.

Rubbish. Waste matter, litter, trash, refuse, debris, and dirt on streets or private property in the jurisdiction, which is or when dry may become a fire hazard. See combustible material.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Rural Area. An area generally designated for agricultural or open space uses with parcels more than 10 acres (4.046873ha) in size.

Rural Residential Area. An area generally designated for single-family residential use with parcels between three (1.2140619ha) and 10 (4.046873ha) acres in size.

Sprinkler Alarm and Supervisory System (SASS). A Dedicated Function Fire Alarm System located at the protected premise installed specifically to monitor sprinkler waterflow alarm, valve supervisory, and general trouble conditions where a Building Fire Alarm is not required.

Streets. Includes alleys, parkways, driveways, sidewalks, and areas between sidewalks and curbs, highways, public right of ways, private road, paper street and, easements.

Substantial Addition. The addition of new gross floor area exceeds fifty percent of the existing gross floor area and the total new gross floor area is 5,000 square feet or greater.

Substantial Alteration. Where fifty percent or greater of the linear length of the wall of the building (exterior and interior) and fifty percent of the roof are removed or replaced within a one-year period.

Temporary Fire Department Access Road. A temporary, all-weather roadway constructed and maintained for the purpose of providing fire apparatus access to buildings, structures, or portions of a site under development until such time as the permanent fire apparatus access road is installed and approved. Temporary access roads shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus, provide the required width and vertical clearance, and remain clear and unobstructed at all times during construction.

Temporary Fire Department Access Road for Construction. An approved temporary roadway for emergency vehicle use during construction of residential subdivision projects.

Temporary Fire Department Access Road for Construction of One (1) Residential (R3) Unit. A temporary roadway for emergency vehicle use during construction of an individual residential (R3) structure where a fire department access road is required as part of the project.

Temporary Water Supply. Water stored for firefighting purposes in an approved aboveground tank during combustible construction.

Tree Litter. Any limbs, bark, branches, and/or leaves in contact with other vegetation or left to gather on the ground.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Weeds. All weeds growing upon streets or private property in the jurisdiction, including any of the following:

1. Weeds that bear seeds of a fluffy nature or are subject to flight.

2. Sagebrush, chaparral (including Chamise, Coyote Brush/Greasewood, Brooms, and Buckwheat), and any other brush or weeds that attain such large growth as to become, when dry, a fire menace to adjacent improved property.

3. Weeds that are otherwise noxious or dangerous;

4. Poison oak and poison sumac when the conditions of growth constitute a menace to public health.

5. Dry grass, brush, tree litter, litter, or other flammable materials that endanger the public safety by creating a fire hazard.

C. Chapter 3. General Precautions Against Fire.

Section 304.3.5 is added, to read:
304.3.5 Clothes Dryers. Clothes dryers shall be frequently cleaned to maintain the lint trap, mechanical and heating components, vent duct, and associated equipment free from accumulations of lint and combustible materials.

Section 308.1.4, Exception 1 is amended to read:

Exception 1. Residential Occupancies.

Section 324 is added to Chapter 3, to read:

SECTION 324 Exterior Fire Hazard Control.
324.1 Subsurface Fires.
324.1.1 Peat Fire. It is the duty of each person, firm, corporation, or association not to permit a peat fire or a fire involving combustible vegetable matters under the surface of the natural ground to remain upon the property. It is hereby declared that it is the duty of any person as herein defined to take all necessary precautions to extinguish any subsurface fire involving peat or vegetable material at the owner's own cost and expense. 324.1.2 Fire Suppression Costs. If there exists upon the lands or property of any person as herein defined a subsurface fire involving the burning or combustion of peat, vegetable matter, or vegetation, and the owner or occupant thereof has not taken reasonable precautions within a reasonable time to extinguish or minimize such fire or combustion, the Fire District may, in addition to its regular duties to extinguish or minimize such fire or combustion, go upon the lands of any person as herein defined and extinguish such fire or combustion. Any costs incurred by the Fire District in fighting the fire and for the cost of proving rescue or emergency medical services shall be a charge against the property owner. The charge shall constitute a debt of the property owner and is collectable by the

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 jurisdiction incurring those costs in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under a contract, express or implied. (See Health and Safety Code, §13009.) Section 325 is added to Chapter 3, to read:

SECTION 325 Automobile Wrecking Yards.
325.1 General. The operation of automobile wrecking yards shall be in accordance with this section.
325.2 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:

Automobile Dismantling Automobile Wrecking Yard
325.3 Requirements.
325.3.1 Permits. An operational fire code permit is required as in Section 105.6.53. 325.3.2 Fire Apparatus Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be constructed throughout the site in accordance with this code and shall be maintained clear of all vehicles and stored items.
325.3.3 Welding and cutting. Welding and cutting operations shall be conducted in an approved location, clear of all flammable liquids and combustible materials, including weeds, tires, and all other debris.
325.3.4 Housekeeping. Combustible rubbish accumulated on site shall be collected and stored in approved containers, rooms, or vaults of noncombustible materials.

Combustible vegetation, cut or uncut, shall be removed when determined by the fire code official to be a fire hazard.
325.3.5 Fire Protection. Offices, storage buildings, and vehicles used for site operations shall each be provided with at least one portable fire extinguisher with not less than a 4- A: 40-B-C rating. When required by the fire code official, additional fire extinguishers shall be provided.
325.3.6 Tire storage. Tires shall be stored in racks or in a manner as approved by the fire code official.
325.3.6.1 Distance from Water Supply. Tire storage shall be located on-site and no further than 500 feet from a fire hydrant or an approved water supply as determined by the fire code official.
325.3.7 Storage Piles. Storage piles shall be located a minimum of 20 feet from property lines and shall have an unobstructed access road on all sides of not less than 20 feet.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 325.3.8 Burning operations. The burning of salvaged vehicles and salvaged or waste materials is prohibited.
325.3.9 Motor vehicle fluids. Motor vehicle fluid shall be drained from salvaged vehicles when such liquids are leaking onto the ground and prior to dismantling or removing engine/motor parts.
325.3.9.1 Mitigation of leaking fluids. Precautions shall be taken to prevent fluids from salvaged vehicles from leaking onto the ground. Supplies or equipment capable of mitigating leaks from fuel tanks, crankcases, brake systems, and transmissions shall be kept available on site. Single-use plugs, diking, and absorbent materials shall be disposed of as hazardous waste and removed from the site in a manner in accordance with federal, state, and local requirements.
325.3.10 Fuel tanks. Fuel tanks of salvaged vehicles shall be emptied of all flammable (gasoline, diesel) fuels in an approved manner and stored in approved tanks. 325.3.10.1 Repair of vehicle fuel tanks. The repair of fuel tanks, including cutting, welding, or drilling of any kind, is prohibited.
325.3.11 Lead acid batteries. Lead acid batteries shall be removed from all salvaged vehicles and stored in an approved manner in a location approved by the fire code official.

D. Chapter 4. Emergency Planning and Preparedness.

Section 401.5.1 is added to read:

4.1.5.1 Nuisance Fire Alarm. A fee may be charged for false/ or nuisance fire alarms in accordance with a fee schedule adopted by the Board of Directors.

Section 401.10 is added to read:
401.10 Aerial Pre-Plans. For all new construction the fire official is authorized to require a fire aerial pre-plan to be prepared by an approved vendor at the cost of the developer.

Section 401.11 is added to read
401.11 Standby Personnel. Where, in the opinion of the fire code official or Fire Chief, it is essential for public safety in a place of assembly, or any other place where people congregate, because of the number of persons, or the nature of the performance, exhibition, display, contest, or activity, the owner, agent, or lessee shall provide standby personnel as required and approved by the fire code official or Fire Chief. If the activity requires fire watch, fire watch shall be provided in accordance with Sections 403.11.1.1 and 403.11.1.2.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Standby personnel needed for EMS standby shall be provided in accordance with Contra Costa County EMS Protocols.

E. Chapter 5. Fire Service Features.

Section 5.3.1.1 is amended to read:
503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this section and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. Exceptions:

1. The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension to 250 feet where the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.

2. Where approved by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be permitted to be exempted or modified for solar photovoltaic power generation facilities
Section 503.1.4 is added to read:
503.1.4 Access to open spaces. When access to open land/space or fire trail systems maintained for public or private use is obstructed by new development of any kind, the developer shall provide alternate acceptable access into the area that is sufficient to allow access for fire personnel and apparatus. The alternate means of access requires the approval of the fire code official.

Section 503.1.5 is added to read:

503.1.5 Existing fire trail systems shall be maintained. When conditions make maintenance of existing trails impractical, alternate means of access shall be provided and requires approval by fire code official.

Section 503.2.1 is amended by adding the following exception:

Exception: A driveway with a minimum width of 16 feet is acceptable for access to one or two single-family dwellings.

Section 505.3 is added, to read:
505.3 Street names and addressing. Street names and addressing shall be submitted for review and approval to the fire code official, whose approval will not be unreasonably withheld. The purpose of the review is to verify that new street names and addressing will not duplicate existing street names and addressing.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Section 506.2.1 is added to read:
506.2.1 Knox Box upgrade. All current businesses and occupancies with current Knox Boxes shall upgrade their lockbox to the eCore Technology by December 31, 2028 F. Chapter 6. Building Services and Systems.

Section 605.3.1 is added to read:
605.3.1 Spark Arrestors. All Chimneys attached to any appliance or fireplace that burns solid fuel shall be equipped with an approved spark arrestor per CBC 2113.9.2 G. Chapter 9. Fire Protection Systems.

Section 901.6.3 is amended to read:
901.6.3 Records. Records of all system inspections, tests, and maintenance required by the reference standards shall be submitted to a third party electronic record keeping service as chosen by the fire district.

Section 902.1 is amended to add:

Substantial Addition. The addition of new gross floor area exceeds fifty percent of the existing gross floor area and the total new gross floor area is 5,000 square feet or greater.

Substantial Alteration. Where fifty percent or greater of the linear length of the wall of the building (exterior and interior) and fifty percent of the roof are removed or replaced within a one-year period.

Section 903.2.1.1 is amended to read:
903.2.1.1 Group A-1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-1 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-1 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:

1. The fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.

3. The fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.

4. The fire area contains a multi-theater complex.

Section 903.2.1.3 is amended to read:
903.2.1.3 Group A-3. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-3 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-3

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:

1. The fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.

3. The fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.

4. The structure exceeds 10,000 square feet, contains more than one fire area containing exhibition and display rooms, and is separated into two or more buildings by firewalls of less than 4-hour fire resistance rating without openings.

Section 903.2.1.4 is amended to read:
903.2.1.4 Group A-4. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout stories containing Group A-4 occupancies and throughout all stories from the Group A-4 occupancy to and including the levels of exit discharge serving that occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:

1. The fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

2. The fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.

3. The fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.

Section 903.2.2 is amended in its entirety, to read:
903.2.2 Group B. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group B occupancies and intervening floors of the building where the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.
903.2.2.1 Ambulatory care facilities. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout the entire floor containing an ambulatory care facility where either of the following conditions exist at any time:

1. Four or more care recipients are incapable of self-preservation.

2. One or more care recipients that are incapable of self-preservation are located at other than the level of exit discharge serving such a facility.

3. In buildings where ambulatory care is provided on levels other than the level of exit discharge, an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed throughout the entire floor as well as all floors below where such care is provided, and all floors between the level of ambulatory care and the nearest level of exit discharge, the level of exit discharge, and all floors below the level of exit discharge.

Exception: Floors classified as an open parking garage are not required to be sprinklered.

Section 903.2.4 is amended to read:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 903.2.3 Group E. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided for Group E occupancies as follows:

1. Throughout all Group E fire areas greater than 2,000 square feet in area.

Exception: An automatic sprinkler system is not required in any Group E Day Care Facility less than 5,000 square feet.

2. The Group E fire area is located on a floor other than a level of exit discharge serving such occupancies.

Exception: In buildings where every classroom has not fewer than one exterior exit door at ground level, an automatic sprinkler system is not required in any area below the lowest level of exit discharge serving that area.

3. The Group E fire area has an occupant load of 300 or more.

4. In rooms or areas with special hazards such as laboratories, vocational shops, and. other such areas where hazardous materials in quantities not exceeding the maximum allowable quantity are used or stored.

5. Throughout any Group E structure greater than 4,000 square feet in area, which contains more than one fire area, and which is separated into two or more buildings by fire walls of less than 4-hour fire resistance rating without openings.

6. For public school state-funded construction projects, see Section 903.2.19.

7. For public school campuses, Kindergarten through 12th grade, see Section 903.2.20.

Section 903.2.4 is amended to read:
903.2.5 Group F-1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group F-1 occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:

1. A Group F-1 fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

2. A Group F-1 fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane.

3. The combined area of all Group F-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 10,000 square feet.

4. A Group F-1 occupancy used for the manufacture. of upholstered furniture or mattresses exceeding 2,500 square feet (232 m2).

Section 903.2.4.4 is added to read:
903.2.4.4 Group F-2. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group F-2 occupancy greater than 5,000 square feet.

Section 903.2.7 is amended to read:
903.2.7 Group M. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings containing a Group M occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:

1. A Group M fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 2. A Group M fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane.

3. The combined area of all Group M fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 10,000 square feet.

4. A Group M occupancy (is) used for the display and sale of upholstered furniture or mattresses exceeds 5,000 square feet.

5. The structure exceeds 5,000 square feet, contains more than one fire area containing a Group M occupancy, and is separated into two or more buildings by fire walls of less than 4-hour fire resistance rating without openings.

Section 903.2.8 is amended to read:
903.2.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all Group R occupancies. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in new manufactured homes, new mobile homes, and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units, including those located in mobile home parks, in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations.

Section 903.2.8.1.1 is added, to read:
903.2.8.1.1 Group R-3 Substantial Addition or Alteration. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all existing Group R-3 dwellings where either of the following occurs:

1. Substantial Addition. The addition of new gross floor area exceeds fifty percent of the existing gross floor area and the total new gross floor area is 3,600 square feet.

2. Substantial Alteration. Where fifty percent or greater of the linear length of the wall of the building (exterior and interior) and fifty percent of the roof are removed or replaced within a one-year period.

Section 903.2.9 is amended to read:
903.2.9 Group S-1. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group S-1 occupancy where one of the following conditions exists:

1. A Group S-1 fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

2. A Group S-1 fire area is located more than three stories above grade plane.

3. The combined area of all Group S-1 fire areas on all floors, including any mezzanines, exceeds 10,000 square feet.

4. A Group S-1 occupancy used for the storage of commercial motor vehicles where the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

Section 903.2.9.1 is amended to read:
903.2.9.1 Repair garages. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings used as repair garages in accordance with Section 406.8 of the California Building Code, as shown:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 1. Buildings having two or more stories above grade plane, including basements, with a fire area containing a repair garage exceeding 5,000 square feet.

2. Buildings not more than one story above grade plane, with a fire area containing a repair garage exceeding 5,000 square feet.

3. Buildings with repair garages servicing vehicles parked in basements.

4. A Group S-1 fire area used for the repair of commercial motor vehicles where the fire area exceeds 5,000 square feet.

Section 903.2.10.1 is amended to read:
903.2.10.1 Group S-2 parking garages. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout buildings classified as parking garages where any of the following conditions exists:

1. Where the fire area of the enclosed parking garage, in accordance with Section 406.6 of the California Building Code, exceeds 5,000 square feet.

2. Where the enclosed parking garage, in accordance with Section 406.6 of the California Building Code, is located beneath other groups.

Exception: Enclosed parking garages located beneath Group R-3 occupancies.

3. Where the fire area of the open parking garage, in accordance with Section 406.5 of the California Building Code, exceeds 48,000 square feet.

Section 903.2.10.3 is added to read:
903.2.10.3 Group S-2 low hazard storage. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all buildings containing a Group S-2 occupancy exceeding 5,000 square feet.

Exception: Open parking garages, including canopies and photovoltaic panel systems with open parking underneath, shall meet automatic sprinkler system requirements in accordance with the 2025 California Building Code and 2025 California Fire Code without local amendment.

Section 903.3.1.1.4 is added to read:
903.3.1.1.4 Undeclared Use. In buildings of undeclared use with floor to structure height greater than 14 feet, the fire sprinkler system shall be designed to conform to Extra Hazard Group I design density. In buildings of undeclared use with floor to structure height less than .14 feet, the fire sprinkler system shall be designed to conform to Ordinary Group II design density. Where a subsequent occupancy requires a system with greater capability, it shall be the responsibility of the owner 'and/or the occupant to upgrade the system.

Section 903.3.1.3 is amended to read:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 903.3.1.3 Sprinkler Systems for One and Two family dwellings. Automatic sprinkler systems for one- and two-family dwellings shall be permitted to be installed in accordance with section 903.3.1.3.1.

Section 903.3.1.3.1 is added to read:
903.3.1.3.1 Pipe limitations. Where CPVC pipe is installed above the insulation or is otherwise located in an unconditioned space, such as in an attic space, or a garage without conditioned living space above, CPVC pipe shall be adequately insulated to a minimum R-19 value, or equivalent, or pipe shall be limited to Type K or L copper, or ferrous piping.

Section 903.3.5.3 is added to read:
903.3.5.3 Non-permissible water supply storage. Swimming pools and ponds shall not be considered water storage for the purposes of Section 903.3.5.

Section 903.3.9 is amended to read:
903.3.9. Floor control valves. Individual floor control valves and water flow detection assemblies shall be provided for each floor in multi-floor buildings at an approved location.

Exception: Group R-3 and R-3.1 Occupancies.

Section 903.4.2 is amended to read:
903.4.2 Alarms. One approved audible and visual device shall be connected to every automatic sprinkler system at an approved location. Such sprinkler water-flow alarm devices shall be activated by water flow equivalent to the flow of a single sprinkler of the smallest orifice size installed in the system. Audible and visual alarm devices shall be provided on the exterior of the building in an approved location. Where a fire alarm system is installed, actuation of the automatic sprinkler system shall actuate the building fire alarm system.

Section 903.6.1 and 903.6.2 are added to read:
903.6.1 Substantial Addition. An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all existing R-3 Occupancy buildings where a substantial addition occurs and the total new gross floor area of the structure exceeds 3,600 square feet. Group R-3 substantial additions or alterations shall comply with Section 903.2.8.1.1. 903.6.2 Change of occupancy classification. Any existing building that undergoes a change of occupancy classification into a higher hazard category shall comply with the requirements of Section 903.2. Relative hazard categories of occupancy groups shall be established based upon the Heights and Areas Hazard Categories of Table 1011.5 of the

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 current edition of the International Existing Building Code, as published by the International Code Council. The requirements of Section 903.2 shall not be required when a change of occupancy classification is made to an equal or lesser hazard category.

Group L occupancies shall be considered a relative hazard of 1 (highest hazard).

Section 907.4.4 is added to read:
907.4.4 Monitoring of other fire systems. In buildings equipped with a fire alarm system or sprinkler alarm and supervisory service (SASS) system, where other fire suppression or extinguishing systems are installed in the building (including, but not limited to commercial kitchen suppression systems, pre-action fire suppression systems, dry chemical systems, and clean agent systems), these other suppression systems shall be monitored by the SASS dedicated function fire alarm system and transmitted as a specific signal to the Central Station. The system shall be monitored in compliance with Section 907.6.6.

Section 907.5.2.3.1 is amended to read:
907.5.2.3.1 Public and common areas. Visible alarm notification appliances shall be provided in public use areas and common use areas, including but not limited to:

1. Sanitary facilities including restrooms, bathrooms, shower rooms, and locker rooms.

2. Corridors, hallways, and aisles with shelving and/or fixtures obstructing the required light intensity for that area.

3. Music practice rooms.

4. Band rooms.

5. Gymnasiums.

6. Multipurpose rooms.

7. Occupational shops.

8. Occupied rooms where ambient noise impairs hearing of the fire alarm.

9. Lobbies.

10. Meeting/Conference rooms.

11. Classrooms.

12. Medical exam rooms.

13. Open office areas.

14. Sales floor areas.

15. Break or lunch rooms

16. Copy or work rooms.

17. Computer server rooms exceeding 200 sq. ft.

18. File or Storage rooms exceeding 200 sq. ft.

Section 907.6.6 is amended to read:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 907.6.6 Monitoring of fire alarm systems. A fire alarm system required by this chapter, or by the California Building Code, shall be monitored by a UL-listed Central Station service in accordance with NFPA 72 and this code.

Exception: Monitoring by a UL-listed central station is not required for:

1. Single- and multiple-station smoke alarms required by Section 907.2.10.

2. Group 1-3 occupancies shall be monitored in accordance with Section 907.2.6.3.

3. Residential Day Care Facilities (occupancy load of 14 or less).

4. One- and two-family dwellings.

5. Residential Care Facilities licensed by the state with an occupant load of 6 or less.

6. Occupancies with local fire alarm system that will give an audible and visible signal at a constantly attended location, as approved by the Fire Code Official.

Section 907.6.7 is added to read:
907.6.7 Certification. New fire alarm systems shall be UL-Certified. A Certificate of Completion and other documentation as listed in NFPA 72 shall be provided for all new fire alarm system installations. It is the responsibility of the building owner or owner's representative to obtain and maintain a current and valid Certificate.

Section 907.6.7.1 is added to read:

1.6.7.1.1 Posting of Certificate. The UL Certificate shall be posted in a durable transparent cover within three feet of the fire alarm control panel within 45 days of the final acceptance test/inspection.

H. Chapter 10. Means of Egress.

Section 1028.5.1 is added to read:
1028.5.1 Exit discharge surface. Exterior exit pathway surfaces shall be suitable for pedestrian use in inclement weather and shall terminate at a public way as defined in the California Building Code.

I. Chapter 33. Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition.

Section 3303.1.2 is added to read:
3303.1.2 Amendments. Amendments may be required to an approved site safety plan if deemed necessary by both the building official and fire official, based on previous fires or hazards that occurred on site or occurring within the jurisdiction.

Section 3303.1.3 is added to read:

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 3303.1.3 Site Security requirements. Site security requirements shall include the following if deemed necessary by both the building official and fire official:

1. Controlled access points.

2. Site fencing, up to 12 feet in height with tamper sensors and security wires on top.

3. Security guards, full-time 24/7 presence on-site, to perform fire watch and patrols.

4. Detection check points located throughout the buildings for fire watch and patrol verification.

5. Security camera coverage throughout the site with motion detection notifications.

6. Identify measures taken to prevent tampering with security cameras and motion sensors.

7. Necessary lighting throughout the project site.

Section 3319 Asbestos Removal is added to read as follows:
3319.1 General. Operations involving removal of asbestos or asbestos-containing materials from buildings shall be in accordance with Section 3319.

Exception: Section 3319 does not apply to the removal of asbestos from:

1. Pumps, valves, gaskets and similar equipment.

2. Pipes, ducts, girders or beams that have a length less than 21 linear feet (6400 mm).

3. Wall or ceiling panels that have an area of less than 10 square feet (0.93 m2) or a dimension of less than 10 linear feet (3048 mm).

4. Floor tiles when their removal can be completed in less than four hours.

5. Group R-3 occupancies.
3319.2 Notification. The fire code official shall be notified 24 hours prior to the commencement and closure of asbestos-removal operations. The permit applicant shall notify the building official when asbestos abatement involves the removal of materials that were used as a feature of the building's fire resistance. 3319.3 Plastic Film. Plastic film that is installed on building elements shall be flame resistant as required for combustible decorative material, in accordance with Section 807. 3319.4 Signs. Approved signs shall be posted at the entrance, exit and exit-access door, decontamination areas and waste disposal areas for asbestos-removal operations. The signs shall state that asbestos is being removed from the area, that asbestos is a suspected carcinogen, and that proper respiratory protection is required. Signs shall have a reflective surface. Lettering shall be a minimum of 2 inches (51 mm) high.

H. Chapter 41 Temporary Heating and Cooking Operations
Section 4104.2 is amended to read:
4104.2 Open-flame cooking devices. Charcoal burners and other open-flame cooking

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 devices shall not be operated on combustible balconies or within 10 feet (3048 mm) of combustible construction.

Exceptions:

1. Residential occupancies

2. Where buildings, balconies and decks are protected by an automatic sprinkler system.

3. LP-gas cooking devices having LP-gas container with a water capacity not greater than 2 1/2 pounds.

I. Chapter 50. Hazardous Materials - General Provisions.

Section 5001.5.1 is amended to add item number 10 and 11 to read as follows:

10. Fire Department related safety equipment
A. Fire alarm control panel (FACP).

B. Sprinkler riser.

C. Fire department connection (FDC).

D. Knox Box location.

E. Gas valve shutoff.

F. Electrical main shutoff.

G. Water shutoff.

H. Elevator equipment room.

11. A Site Fire/Explosion/Hazardous Material Release Analysis Assessment. A Fire Protection Engineer (FPE) stamped risk assessment is required for each possible hazard risk associated with fire, explosion, smoke, and toxicity associated with the possible incident at a facility that is identified as a bulk transfer/process/storage facility. Refer to NFPA 550 & 551 for references.

Section 5001.5.3 is added to read:
5001.5.3 Emergency response support information. Floor plans, material safety data sheets, Hazardous Materials Management Plans (HMMP), Hazardous Material Inventory Statements (HMIS), and other information must be stored at a readily accessible location; as determined by the fire code official. This location may be in cabinets located outside of facilities or buildings. Information may be required to be maintained in a specific electronic media format to facilitate computer aided dispatching.

Section 5003.9.1.2 is added to read:
5003.9.1.2 Documentation. Evidence of compliance with provisions of this chapter as well as with state and federal hazardous material regulations shall be maintained on site and available for inspection by fire department personnel.

J. Chapter 56. Explosives and Fireworks.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Section 5601.1.3 is amended to read as follows:
5601.1.3 Fireworks. The possession, manufacture, storage, sale, handling and use of fireworks are prohibited within jurisdiction of the District.

Exceptions:

1. Storage and handling of fireworks by a Public Safety Agency.

2. Manufacture, assembly and testing of fireworks as allowed in Section 5605 and Health and Safety Code Division 11.

3. The use of fireworks for fireworks displays pyrotechnics before a proximate audience and pyrotechnic special effects in motion pictures, television, theatrical or group entertainment productions as allowed in Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 6 Fireworks reprinted in Section 5608 and Health and Safety Code Division 11.

4. Snap Caps and Party Poppers classified by the State Fire Marshal as pyrotechnic devices.

Section 5601.1.3.1 to 5601.1.3.3 is added to read as follows:
5601.1.3.1 Definitions. "Responsible party'' means any of the following:

1. A person that owns, rents, leases, or otherwise has possession of, or is in immediate control of, a residence or other private property or a vessel.

2. A person that organizes, supervises, sponsors, conducts, allows, controls, or controls access to, the possession, manufacture, sale, offer for sale, use, or discharge of fireworks at a residence or other private property or on a vessel.

Exception: If a residence or other private property is rented or leased for a period of more than 30 consecutive days, the landlord or lessor is not a responsible party unless the landlord or lessor: has possession of, or is in immediate control of, the residence or other private property; or has knowledge of the possession, manufacture, sale, offer for sale, use, or discharge of fireworks at the residence or other private property.

Section 5601.1.3.2 Responsible party liability. A responsible party shall maintain, manage, and supervise the residence or other private property, or vessel, for which they are responsible to prevent violations of this chapter. A responsible party violates this chapter if any person possesses, manufactures, sells, offers to sell, uses, or discharges, any fireworks at the residence or other private property, or on the vessel, for which the responsible party is responsible, regardless of whether the responsible party is present when the violation occurs.

Section 5601.1.3.3 Infraction arrest and citation. Any Fire Official and any City, County, or State Peace Officer, shall have and are hereby vested with the authority to arrest any person who violates the following provisions of the Code and other codes an indicated, punishable as an infraction or an administrative citation.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 Section 5601.2.2 is amended to read as follows:
5601.2.2 Sale and retail display. No person shall construct a retail display or offer for sale any explosives, explosive materials, or fireworks within the jurisdiction. Exception: Snap Caps and Party Poppers classified by the State Fire Marshal as pyrotechnic devices.

Section 5601.2.4 is amended to read as follows:
5601.2.4 Financial responsibility. Before a permit is issued pursuant to Section 5601.2, the applicant shall file with the jurisdiction a corporate surety bond in the principal sum of $2,000,000 or a public liability insurance policy for the same amount, for the purpose of the payment of all damages to persons or property which arise from, or are caused by, the conduct of any act authorized by the permit upon which any judicial judgment results.

The fire code official is authorized to specify a greater or lesser amount when, in his or her opinion, conditions at the location of use indicate a greater or lesser amount is required. Government entities shall be exempt from this bond requirement.

Exception: Fireworks in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1 K. Chapter 6. See Section 5608.

L. Chapter 57. Flammable and Combustible Liquids.

Section 5703.3 is amended to read:
5703.3 Facility site Fire/Explosion/Hazardous Material Release Analysis Assessment. A Fire Protection Engineer (FPE) stamped risk assessment is required for each possible hazard risk associated with fire, explosion, smoke, and toxicity associated with the possible incident at a facility that is identified as a bulk transfer/process/storage facility when required by the fire official. Refer to NFPA 550 & 551 for references Section 5703.3.1 is added to read:
5703.3.1 Facility site Fire/Explosion/Hazardous Material Release Analysis Assessment.

A Fire Protection Engineer (FPE) stamped risk assessment is required for each possible hazard risk associated with fire, explosion, smoke, and toxicity associated with the possible incident at a facility that is identified as a bulk transfer/process/storage facility when required by the fire official. Refer to NFPA 550 & 551 for references.

Section 5704.2.9.6.1 is amended to read as follows:

Section 5704.2.9.6.1 Locations where above-ground tanks are prohibited. The storage of Class I and II liquids in above-ground tanks outside of buildings is prohibited in all zoning districts except districts zoned for commercial, industrial, or agricultural uses.

Exception: Above-ground tanks for the purpose of emergency power generator installations in areas zoned commercial, industrial, agricultural, business district, rural or

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 rural residential, and for facilities on an individual basis consistent with the intent of this provision.

Section 5706.2.4.4 is amended to read:

Section 5706.2.4.4 Locations where above-ground tanks are prohibited. Storage of Class I and II liquids in above-ground tanks is prohibited in all zoning districts except district zoned for commercial, industrial, or agricultural uses.

Exception: Above-ground tanks for the purpose of emergency power generator installations in areas zoned commercial, industrial, agricultural, business district, rural or rural residential, and for facilities on an individual basis consistent with the intent of this provision.

M. Chapter 58. Flammable Gasses and Flammable Cryogenic Fluids.

Section 5806.2 is amended to read as follows:
5806.2 Limitation. The storage of flammable cryogenic fluids in stationary containers outside of buildings is prohibited in any area which is zoned for other than industrial use. Exception:

Liquid hydrogen fuel systems in compliance with Section 5806.3 or 5806.4.

N. Chapter 61. Liquefied Petroleum Gases.

Section 6103.2.1.7 is amended to read:
6103.2.1.7 Use for food preparation. Individual portable L-P containers used, stored, or handled inside a building classified as a Group A, Group B, or Group M occupancy for the purposes of cooking, food display, or a similar use, shall be limited in size to one quart capacity and shall be of an approved type. The number of portable containers permitted will be at the discretion of the fire code official. LP-gas appliances used for food preparation shall be listed for such use in accordance with the California Mechanical Code and NFPA 58.

Section 6104.2 is amended to read:
6104.2 Maximum capacity within established limit. The storage of liquefied petroleum gas is prohibited in any central business district and in all zoning districts except districts zoned for commercial, industrial, rural, or agricultural uses. The aggregate capacity of any one installation used for the storage of liquefied petroleum gas shall not exceed a water capacity of 2,000 gallons (7570 L).

O. Chapter 80. Referenced Standards.

Chapter 80 is amended by adding the following referenced standards:

NFPA 3 (2021): Recommended Practice for Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems.

Ordinance No. 2025-
14 NFPA 850 (2020): Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage Direct Current Converter Stations.

Chapter 80 is further amended by amending the NFPA 13D (2022) (Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes) standard as follows:

Section 7.7.1 is added, to read:

7.7.1 Where CPVC pipe is installed above the normal insulation in an unconditioned space, such as in an attic space, or a garage without conditioned living space above, CPVC pipe shall be adequately insulated to a minimum R-19 value, or equivalent, or pipe shall be limited to Type K or L copper, or ferrous piping.

Section 8.3.5.1.2 is amended to read:

8.3.5.1.2 Where fuel-fired equipment is below or on the same level as occupied areas of the dwelling unit, at least one quick-response intermediate temperature sprinkler shall be installed above the equipment or at the wall separating the space with the fuel-fired equipment from the occupied space. In unconditioned spaces, CPVC pipe shall be adequately insulated to a minimum R-19 value, or equivalent, or pipe shall be limited to Type K or L copper, or ferrous piping.

P. Appendix B. Fire-Flow Requirements for Buildings.

Table B105.2 is amended to read:

TABLE B105.2 Required Fire-Flow for Buildings Other Than One- and Two-Family Dwellings, Group R-3 and R-4 Buildings and Townhouses

AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER

SYSTEM (DESIGN STANDARD)

MINIMUM FIREFLOW
(GALLONS PER MINUTE)

FLOW DURATION
(HOURS)
No automatic sprinkler system Value in Table B105.1(2) Duration in Table B105.1(2) Section 903.3.1.1 of the California
Fire Code
50% of the value in Table
B105.1(2)a
Duration in Table B105.1(2)
at the reduced flow rate
Section 903.3.1.2 of the California
Fire Code
50% of the value in Table
B105.1(2)a
Duration in Table B105.1(2)
at the reduced flow rate
For SI: 1 gallon per minute= 3.785 Lim
a. The reduced fire-flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute.

Appendix C. Fire Hydrant Locations and Distribution.

Table C102.l is amended as follows:

The title of Table Cl02.l is amended to read: TABLE Cl02.l REQUIRED NUMBER AND