NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Form PPQ-0 CONTRACT INFORMATION Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4
1.Contractor Information
Firm Name:V Lopez Jr and Sons Gen Eng Contractors Inc CAGE Code:
Address:1639 E Donovan Rd Santa Maria Ca 93454 DUNS Number:
Phone Number:8059281198
Email Address:[email protected]
Point of Contact: Butch Lopez Contact Phone Number: 8059281179
2.Work Performed as: ®Prime Contractor ❑ Sub Contractor ❑Joint Venture ❑ Other(Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor,who was the prime(Name/Phone# :
3.Contract Information
Contract Number: (805)354-4635
Delivery/Task Order Number(if applicable):
Contract Type: ®Firm Fixed Price ❑ Cost Reimbursement ❑ Other(Please specify):
Contract Title:Orcutt Rd&Clarke Ave Pipeline—Install New Transmission Main Project Contract Location: Orcutt,CA
Award Date(mm/dd/yy): 11/12/21
Contract Completion Date(mm/dd/yy): 04/27/22
Actual Completion Date(mm/dd/yy): 08/02/22
Explain Differences: Project was delayed due to material availability for 20-inch DIP,and butterfly valves for 16-inch and 20-inch pipe. Contract time changes reflect changes in conditions during install for complex inverts with 20-inch DIP for long runs to avoid existing utilities. The contractor was very effective in potholing locations to help the GSWC to quickly determine the new route to continue construction. Some of the inverts required new waivers which also took time for review and approval.
Original Contract Price(Award Amount): $2,210,797.50
Final Contract Price(to include all modifications, if applicable): $2,298,895.93 Explain Differences: The difference in cost of$88,098.43 is attributed to the combination of multiple large pipe inverts throughout the main,time and materials to avoid unknown utilities to avoid during construction,and repair of the trench due to poor soil conditions during install. The contractor made every effort to identify the unknown conditions and worked with GSWC to continue construction in accordance to design standards. All extra costs were tracked and agreed upon between the Contractor and GSWC.
4.Project Description:
Complexity of Work ❑High ®Med ❑Routine
How is this project relevant to project of submission?(Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
The project was a 20-inch and 16-inch DIP transmission water main to improve system hydraulics between multiple pressure zones. The new pipeline interconnected in multiple locations and required phasing to not interfere with County road maintenance in the area. Work consisted of potholing to avoid unknown utilities,and large inverts to avoid utilities which cross the road multiple times along the route.
CLIENT INFORMATION Client to complete Blocks 5-8
5.Client Information
Name: James Fields
Title:Capital Program Engineer—Region 1 Coastal District Phone Number: 805-354-4635
Email Address:[email protected]
Revised 7 December 2011 1
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY
6.Describe the client's role in the project:
My role was project manager for the above mentioned project. I was responsible for overseeing design and preparation of the bid documents,and for construction of the project. I answered RFIs and monitored the budget of the project,and scheduled our inspection team with construction events. I also worked with Santa Barbara Public Works to coordinate permit requirements,and relay any changes to the traffic control with the County and CalTrans.
7.Date Questionnaire was completed mm/dd/ : 03/02/23
8.Client's Signature: Date:
a
D 2023.03.02 08:34:81
-08,00,
NOTE: NAVFAC REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO NAVFAC WITH THEIR PROPOSAL,AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NAVFAC SOLICITATIONS.CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.HOWEVER,QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO NAVFAC.PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR NAVFAC POC INFORMATION.THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.
Revised 7 December 2011 2
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVAL UATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E)Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and An Exceptional rating is appropriate exceeds many to the Government/Owner's when the Contractor successfully benefit. The contractual performance of the performed multiple significant events element or sub-element being assessed was that were of benefit to the accomplished with few minor problems for Government/Owner.A singular benefit, which corrective actions taken by the contractor however,could be of such magnitude that was highly effective. it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.
Also,there should have been NO
significant weaknesses identified.
(VG)Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and A Very Good rating is appropriate when exceeds some to the Government's/Owner's the Contractor successfully performed a benefit.The contractual performance of the significant event that was a benefit to the element or sub-element being assessed was Government/Owner.There should have accomplished with some minor problems for been no significant weaknesses identified. which corrective actions taken by the contractor
were effective.
(S)Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when requirements.The contractual performance of there were only minor problems,or major the element or sub-element contains some minor problems that the contractor recovered problems for which corrective actions taken by from without impact to the contract. the contractor appear or were satisfactory. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.Per DOD policy,a
fundamental principle of assigning ratings
is that contractors will not be assessed a
rating lower than Satisfactory solely for
not performing beyond the requirements
of the contract.
(M)Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual A Marginal is appropriate when a requirements.The contractual performance of significant event occurred that the the element or sub-element being assessed contractor had trouble overcoming which reflects a serious problem for which the impacted the Government/Owner. contractor has not yet identified corrective
actions. The contractor's proposed actions
appear only marginally effective or were not
fully implemented.
(U)Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate requirements and recovery is not likely in a when multiple significant events occurred timely manner.The contractual performance of that the contractor had trouble the element or sub-element contains serious overcoming and which impacted the problem(s)for which the contractor's corrective Government/Owner.A singular problem, actions appear or were ineffective. however,could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an
unsatisfactory rating.
(N)Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.
Revised 7 December 2011 3
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY
Contractor Information(Firm Name): V Lopez Jr and Sons Gen Eng Contractors Inc Client Information(Name): Golden State Water Company
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE.
. QUALITY:
a)Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N b)Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N c)Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive E VG S M U N customer guidance
d)Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements(without adverse effect on E VG S M U N performance)
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a)Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or E VG S M U N the schedule was not met,please address below)
b)Rate the contractor's use of available resources to accomplish tasks E VG S M U N identified in the contract
. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a)To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N b)Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; E VG S M U N responsiveness to administrative reports,businesslike and communication) c)To what extent was the contractor cooperative,businesslike,and concerned E VG S M U N with the interests of the customer?
d)Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4.MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR
a)Effectiveness of on-site management,including management of E VG S M U N subcontractors, suppliers,materials,and/or labor force? b)Ability to hire,apply,and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N c)Government Property Control E VG S M U N d)Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N e)Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N f)Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N g)Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or E VG S M U N priority,including planning,execution and response to Government changes h)Effectiveness of overall management(including ability to effectively lead, E VG S M U N manage and control the program)
5.COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMEN
a)Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed E VG S M U N price(s)?
Revised 7 December 2011 4
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY
Contractor Information(Firm Name): V Lopez Jr and Sons Gen Eng Contractors Inc Client Information(Name): Golden State Water Company
b)Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG S M U N cost,improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client c)If this is/was a Government cost type contract,please rate the Contractor's timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation,monthly status reports/budget variance reports,compliance E VG S M U N with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances(under runs or overruns)
d)Is the Contractor's accounting system adequate for management and Yes No tracking of costs? If no,please explain in Remarks section. e)If this is/was a Government contract,has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending Yes No terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
f)Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial Yes No problems? If yes,please explain below.
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a)To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety,adhere to its approved safety plan,and respond to safety issues? E VG S M U N (Includes: following the users rules,regulations,and requirements regarding housekeeping,safety,correction of noted deficiencies,etc. b)Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and E VG S M U N personnel security requirements.
.GENERAL
a)Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR,PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner E VG S M U N regarding urgent contractual issues).
b)Compliance with contractual terms/provisions(explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N c)Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no,please explain below) Yes No d)In summary,provide an overall rating for the work performed by this E VG S M U N contractor.
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable)and/or additional remarks.Furthermore,please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths,weaknesses,deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk(please attach additional pages if necessary):
Revised 7 December 2011 5
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION
DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY