12.D Report AB 2449 Policy and Procedure 2023-03-21 — Pismo Beach City Council, March 21, 2023

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Agenda Item #12.D

SUBJECT/TITLE:

AB 2449 LEGISLATIVE MEETING TELECONFERENCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution establishing policies and procedures for compliance with Assembly Bill 2449 relating to teleconference participation in legislative meetings.

BACKGROUND:

The provisions of Assembly Bill 2449 (Rubio) became effective January 1, 2023. This bill amends the Brown Act with respect to the virtual (teleconference) participation in legislative meetings by legislative body members. The provisions of this bill will apply to all meetings of the City Council; Conference and Visitors Bureau Board; Parking Advisory Committee; Parks, Recreation and Beautification Commission; and Planning Commission.

On February 21, 2023, the City Council directed staff to return with a policy detailing the compliance measures that will be required of the City’s legislative body members. This report will summarize the provisions of AB 2449 for reference, as well as the proposed local compliance procedures (Attachment 1).

Pandemic-Era Meeting Practices
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, a virtual platform (Zoom) has been used for teleconference participation in the City’s legislative meetings. Since the time in-person meetings were resumed, meetings have been held by default as “hybrid” meetings, which denotes that the meeting is held in person for all intents and purposes, and that a virtual access option is also provided. Generally, any combination of legislative body members, staff, and members of the public have been able to attend a meeting virtually, so long as at least a quorum of the legislative body was within the City’s geographic jurisdiction.

Through the end of 2022, there was no limitation on the number of meetings a legislative body member could attend remotely, or on the reasons for remote attendance, but as of January 2023, that flexibility has been significantly curtailed by AB 2449. Staff anticipates that the City will continue to use the “hybrid” meeting model for the foreseeable future, though there is no legal obligation to offer a virtual attendance option.

Current Regulatory Environment
With AB 2449 becoming effective on January 1, 2023, there are presently three options that may potentially be utilized for teleconference attendance by Legislative Body Members (Members):

 Traditional Teleconference Regulations. The Brown Act has always offered the option for Members wishing to attend by teleconference (historically, this has meant literally by telephone). Stringent requirements for traditional Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-1

teleconferencing include publication of the member’s physical address on the agenda itself, as well as the posting of the agenda, allowing public access, calling for public comment, and ensuring ADA access, at the remote location. This option has been utilized only occasionally in Pismo Beach. This traditional model remains available in the event a Member wishes to comply with the full requirements.

 Emergency Teleconference Regulations / AB 361. In early 2020, Governor’s Orders N-29-20 and N-08-21 effectively suspended traditional teleconference requirements for health and safety reasons, making it possible for Members to join a meeting virtually without advance noticing or providing direct public access to the location. AB 361 (Rivas), effective October 2021, codified these provisions in the Brown Act through January 2024, allowing agencies to continue to utilize relaxed teleconferencing standards during declared states of emergency, provided that the legislative body made certain findings every 30 days relating to the continued need to hold virtual meetings for health and safety reasons. City legislative bodies made these findings until the end of 2022. The findings have been discontinued locally, but in the event a qualifying emergency order were to be enacted prior to January 1, 2024, the provisions of AB 361 would again be an option, if appropriate findings could be made. On January 1, 2024, AB 361 will sunset entirely.

 New Teleconference Regulations / AB 2449. Beginning January 2023, AB 2449 further amends the Brown Act to regulate teleconference participation in legislative meetings, offering a complex alternative to traditional teleconference options. This bill significantly limits the use of remote teleconferencing compared to that which has been permitted under emergency teleconference regulations enacted at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. AB 2449 regulates only attendance by legislative body members and does not regulate attendance by staff or the public. However, the bill does impose a number of requirements on the City relating to meeting administration, creating additional implementation workload for staff.

Bill and Policy Provisions
Key provisions of the bill, as well as the proposed companion policy provisions, are outlined below.

Limitations on Use

Bill requirements:
 Legislative body members may participate remotely under AB 2449 a limited number of times per year. Overall, a member may remotely participate in meetings under this law for no more than three consecutive months; and for no more than 20% of the regular meetings for the legislative body within a calendar year (capped at 2 meetings per year for bodies that meet fewer than 10 times per year). These limits, detailed in the Policy, factor in Regular, Special, Closed Session, and all other meetings.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-2

 Regardless of other factors, use of the “Just Cause” exception is capped at 2 meetings per year regardless of the body’s meeting schedule.

Companion policy provisions:
 Calculation of these limits will be based on the number of regular meetings a legislative body would have in a year under its adopted schedule, not accounting for any cancellations.

Selection of an Exception

Bill requirements:
 A member of a legislative body wishing to participate remotely under AB 2449 may do so either for “just cause” or under “emergency circumstances,” as those terms are defined by the bill.

Companion policy provisions:
 The law does not clearly delineate the difference between the circumstances of two exceptions, and the Member shall be responsible for their determination as to the appropriate exception, which staff will accept at face value.

Option 1: Just Cause Exception

Bill requirements:
 This exception may be invoked in cases of caregiving of a dependent; contagious illness; need related to a physical or mental disability; official governmental travel.

 The Member must notify the legislative body at the earliest possible opportunity, up to and including at the start of a meeting, of their “Just Cause” need to participate remotely.

 The Member must also provide a “general description” of the circumstances relating to the member’s need to appear remotely, which need not be more than 20 words or disclose any personal medical information.

 The Member must disclose, before any action is taken, whether any other individuals 18 years of age or older are present in the room at the remote location, and the general nature of the member’s relationship with the individual. This disclosure must take place during the meeting itself, even if the notification and description were given in advance.

Companion policy provisions:
 Under the City’s local implementation practices, any of these compliance measures that must be addressed during the meeting shall be addressed at the start of the meeting. Time shall be set aside as soon as the meeting is convened, but prior to the attendance roll call, for the Mayor or Chair to assure that any necessary business is conducted.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-3

 The Member shall deliver the notification and description of circumstances by email to the legislative body in advance of the meeting, in which case the message will be retained as agenda correspondence, and/or orally at the beginning of the meeting during this period, in which case the statement will be reflected in the meeting record.

 The required disclosure regarding other adults in the room will also take place during this allotted time.

Option 2: Emergency Circumstances Exception

Bill requirements:
 This exception may be invoked in cases of a physical or family medical emergency that prevents a member from attending in person.

 The Member must make a request to the legislative body at the earliest possible opportunity, up to and including at the start of a meeting, to attend by teleconference. The legislative body must take action by majority vote, during the meeting, to approve the request.

 The Member shall deliver the request and description of circumstances by email in advance of the meeting, in which case the message will be retained as agenda correspondence, and/or orally at the beginning of the meeting during this period, in which case the statement will be reflected in the meeting record. If the request is made prior to the meeting, the body must still act on the request during the meeting.

 The required disclosure regarding other adults in the room will also take place during this allotted time.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-4

Other Provisions

Bill requirements:
 At least a quorum of the members of the legislative body must participate at a singular physical meeting location identified on the agenda, within the local agency’s jurisdiction, and open to the public. This means that no more than two Members may utilize these relaxed teleconference provisions at one meeting. In the event fewer than three members were to be physically present at the beginning of a legislative meeting, no meeting could be called to order.

 Members participating remotely must participate through both audio and visual technology.

 Each agenda must describe the means by which members of the public may observe or attend the meeting and offer public comment, including a way to attend via teleconference platform. Members of the public must be allowed to make public comment in real time during all allotted public comment periods.

 Meeting proceedings must be suspended in the event of a disruption that prevents the transmittal of meeting video and audio to the public, or prevents the receipt of public comment, on the teleconference platform, until meeting audio and video service are restored.

 All votes taken at a meeting where any Member attends by teleconference under the provisions of AB 2449 must be taken by roll call vote.

Enforcement and Absences
AB 2449 contains no enforcement provisions above and beyond the Brown Act’s existing “cure and correct” provisions.

While Members will generally be responsible for their own conduct in terms of complying with AB 2449 and this companion policy, failure to comply with the law will constitute a violation of the Brown Act, potentially jeopardizing the validity of meeting proceedings.

The City, therefore, has an interest in assuring to the best of its ability that any Members attending a meeting by teleconference do so in compliance with the law, and this policy is tailored with that in mind.

Staff recommends that, in the event a Member attempts to attend a meeting by teleconference in excess of the allowable number of times per year; in excess of three consecutive months; without making the necessary notices, requests, or disclosures; or if the Member’s request to attend under the “Emergency Circumstances” exception is made but not approved, the Member be counted as absent for the attendance roll call, and in the meeting record. In this event, the Member would be permitted to remain on the teleconference platform and observe the meeting, but as a passive attendee, and not be permitted to vote on any motions presented.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-5

Existing policies and laws regulating legislative body member absences (including adopted Bylaws for Advisory Body Members, and Government Code Section 36513 for Council Members) will not be affected by this legislation or the City’s policy.

Conclusion and Recommendation
In order to clarify and assure uniformity in the City’s practices for implementing the requirements of Assembly Bill 2449, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) establishing a policy and procedure for teleconference attendance at legislative meetings under the provisions of the bill.

AB 2449 is projected to sunset on January 1, 2026, after which, unless further legislation is adopted, only the pre-pandemic, traditional Brown Act rules will remain. As such, the City’s policy will expire concurrently.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact from adoption of this policy. Any additional workload associated with compliance with Assembly Bill 2449 will be absorbed and not impact the adopted budget.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Amend, and then adopt, the resolution.

2. Do not adopt the resolution; provide alternative direction to staff.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution
Submitted by: Erica Inderlied, City Clerk Meeting Date: March 21, 2023 City Manager Approval:

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-6

RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PISMO BEACH,

CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 2449 RELATING TO TELECONFERENCE PARTICIPATION

IN LEGISLATIVE MEETINGS
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 2449, effective January 1, 2023, amends the Brown Act, California Government Code Sections 54950 et seq., as it pertains to teleconference meeting participation by legislative body members; and
WHEREAS, AB 2449 will significantly curtail the ability of legislative body members to attend meetings virtually as compared to the relaxed teleconferencing laws that were enacted at the beginning of the COVID-19 and have seen been in effect; and WHEREAS, addressing these complex new regulations uniformly across all of the City’s legislative bodies will require the establishment of policy and procedure.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach as follows:

I. Applicability.

When a legislative body member wishes to attend a legislative meeting by teleconference under the provisions of Assembly Bill 2449, codified at California Government Code Section 54953(f) et seq., the following policies and procedures shall apply. Nothing herein is intended to prevent a member’s ability to attend a legislative meeting remotely if such attendance is otherwise authorized by Government Code Section 54953.

II. Terms.
“Chairperson” shall mean the Mayor or Chair of the legislative body, as applicable. “Vice- Chairperson” shall mean the Mayor Pro Tempore, or Vice-Chair of the legislative body, as applicable.
“City” shall mean City of Pismo Beach.
“Description” shall mean a brief general description of a legislative body member’s circumstances that warrant teleconference meeting attendance under the “Just Cause” exception or “Emergency Circumstances” exception, which need not exceed 20 words and need not to disclose any medical diagnosis, disability, or exempt personal medical information. (GC 54953(f)(2)(A)(i)–(ii))
“Disclosure” shall mean an announcement by the Member, made during the legislative meeting where the Member will attend by teleconference, disclosing the presence of other Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-7

individuals over the age of 18 in the room at the Member’s teleconference location, and the general nature of the individual’s relationship to the Member. (GC 54953(f)(2)(B)) “Legislative body” shall have the same meaning as prescribed by Government Code Section 54952, i.e. a body that is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. “Meeting” and “legislative meeting” shall have the same meaning as prescribed by Government Code Section 54952.2, i.e. a meeting of a legislative body that is required to be noticed under the Ralph M. Brown Act.
“Member” shall mean a member of a legislative body.
“Notification” shall mean a notification from a legislative body member of the Member’s need to attend a meeting by teleconference under the “Just Cause” exception.

Notifications shall not require legislative body approval. (GC 54953(f)(2)(A)(i)) “Request” shall mean a request from a legislative body member that their legislative body actively approve their request to attend a meeting by teleconference under the “Emergency Circumstances” exception. (GC 54953(f)(2)(A)(ii)) “Teleconference” attendance at a legislative meeting, for purposes of this policy, shall be presumed to be accomplished by Zoom or the equivalent two-way audio-visual virtual software platform in use by the City at that time. “Teleconference” attendance shall mean attendance solely by virtual platform and shall not include a Member who attends a meeting in person and secondarily views the meeting by virtual platform. Provisions of this policy shall apply only to teleconference attendance under AB 2449 and shall not constrain the Member’s ability to attend by teleconference under other sections of the Brown Act.

III. Available Exceptions for Teleconference Attendance.

The Member shall be responsible for determining which of the two available exceptions is applicable to the Member’s need to attend by teleconference. The Member’s determination shall not be investigated by staff as to the veracity of any such request or claim. Such determination shall be subject to review by the legislative body alone. The available exceptions are:

1. “Just Cause” (GC 54953(f)(2)(A)(i))

2. “Emergency Circumstances” (GC 54953(f)(2)(A)(ii))
IV. Exceptions Defined.

1. Exception #1: “Just Cause” circumstances are defined as any one of the following:
Caregiving of a child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, sibling, spouse, or domestic partner that requires a member to participate remotely.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-8

A contagious illness that prevents the member from attending in person. A need related to a physical or mental disability.
Travel while on business of the legislative body or another state or local agency.

2. Exception #2: “Emergency Circumstances” are defined as a physical or family medical emergency that prevents a member from attending in person.

3. The foregoing definitions are set forth in this policy for convenience; in the event applicable law is changed to amend the nature of qualifying teleconference circumstances, the amended law shall supersede this section.

V. Limitation on Number of Uses.

1. Members may attend meetings by teleconference under AB 2449 no more than the following number of times per calendar year:
City Council: Four (4) meetings per year
Conference and Visitors Bureau Board: Two (2) meetings per year Parking Advisory Committee: Two (2) meetings per year
Parks, Recreation and Beautification Commission: Two (2) meetings per year Planning Commission: Four (4) meetings per year
The above limitations shall factor in all meetings noticed under the Brown Act, whether Regular, Special, Closed, Joint, or otherwise. In the event a Member attends by teleconference multiple, contiguous meetings held on the same date, each meeting shall be counted separately.

2. Notwithstanding any other provision, a Member may utilize the “Just Cause” exception no more than two (2) times per calendar year.

3. Notwithstanding any other provision, a Member may not attend meetings solely by teleconference for a period of more than three consecutive calendar months.

4. In the event a Member attends meetings solely by teleconference for a period of three consecutive calendar months, or attends meetings by teleconference the maximum number of allowable times per year, the Member must either attend in person; attend by other permissible teleconference provisions; or be counted as absent, for the remaining meetings in that calendar year.

VI. Procedure for Legislative Body Members.

1. A Member wishing to avail themselves of the “Just Cause” exception shall adhere to the following:

A. Notification of the member’s need to attend by teleconference, along with the required description of the circumstances creating the need, shall be made in Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-9

writing prior to the meeting, and/or orally at the start of the subject meeting or during any prior meeting.
a. If the notification and description are delivered prior to the meeting, the Member shall submit the notification and description:
In writing by email;
To the entire legislative body, preferably to the body’s group email address;
With a copy to staff.

Such communication to the entire legislative body shall be deemed to be not in violation of the Brown Act.
b. If the notification and description are delivered during a meeting prior to the meeting where the Member wishes to attend by teleconference, the Member shall make the required notification and description during the Member Comments order of business.
c. If the notification and description are delivered at the start of the subject meeting, the Member shall be present on the teleconference platform at the time the meeting is convened, and at the prompting of the Chairperson, shall make the required notification and description during the meeting prior to the attendance roll call. (Refer to Section 3 below.)
B. The Member shall disclose the presence of any other adults in the room at the teleconference location, and the general nature of their relationship to the member, during the subject meeting. This requirement shall apply regardless of the timing of the notification and description.

2. A Member wishing to avail themselves of the “Emergency Circumstances” exception shall adhere the following:

A. A request that the legislative body approve the Member’s request to attend by teleconference, along with the required description of the circumstances creating the need, shall be made in writing prior to the meeting, and/or orally at the start of the subject meeting.
a. If the request and description are delivered prior to the meeting, the Member shall submit the request and description:
In writing by email;
To the entire legislative body, preferably to the body’s group email address;
With a copy to staff.

Such communication to the entire legislative body shall be deemed to be not in violation of the Brown Act, so long as there is no discussion of any item of Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-10

business within the legislative body’s jurisdiction. Regardless, the legislative body’s action to approve or deny the teleconference request must be taken during a noticed meeting.
b. If the request and description are made at the start of the subject meeting, the Member shall be present on the teleconference platform at the time the meeting is convened, and at the prompting of the Chairperson, shall make the required request and description during the meeting prior to the attendance roll call. (Refer to Meeting Procedures, below.)
B. The legislative body must move to approve or deny the request during the meeting prior to the attendance roll call. (Refer to Meeting Procedures, below.) C. The Member shall disclose the presence of any other adults in the room at the teleconference location, and the general nature of their relationship to the member, during the subject meeting. This requirement shall apply regardless of the timing of the request and description.

3. Notwithstanding any other provision, teleconferencing Member(s) shall participate through both audio and visual technology. Members may mute their microphone while not speaking, but Members shall be visible through the visual technology at all times during the meeting. In the event a member is not visible, the member shall be noted as absent during that period.

VII.Recordkeeping.

1. The Member shall be responsible for assuring that any description, notification, request, and/or disclosure related to teleconference attendance are made in a manner that may be placed into the meeting record.

2. To the extent that the Member’s notification, description and/or request is delivered prior to the meeting, staff shall archive the written communication as agenda correspondence along with the meeting record.

3. To the extent that the Member’s notification, description, request, and/or disclosure is delivered during a legislative meeting, staff shall record the same in the minute record, along with record of the legislative body’s action to approve or deny any “Emergency Circumstances” requests.

4. The legislative body’s Minute Clerk shall keep data regarding each Member’s use of teleconference attendance provisions under AB 2449, and apprise the Chairperson if any Member has reached their annual limit. (Refer to Limitation on Number of Uses, above.)
Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-11

VIII. Meeting Procedures.

1. Business to be conducted by the legislative body relating to compliance with these regulations shall be conducted after the Call to Order, but prior to the attendance roll call, of the meeting where a Member will or may attend by teleconference. The Chairperson shall be responsible for the conduct of this portion of the meeting, with assistance from staff if needed. All related business shall be conducted in a manner that is evident to other meeting attendees and may be recorded in the meeting record.

Such business to be conducted prior to attendance roll call shall include, and be conducted in substantially this form:

A. If any Member is not present in person and the Chairperson is not aware of the Member’s planned absence, the Chairperson shall acknowledge that the Member either is, or may be, present on the teleconference platform.

B. If necessary, staff shall confirm whether the Member is present on the teleconference platform.

C. If the Member is present on the teleconference platform:
a. If the Member has made their notification or request in writing prior to the meeting: The Chairperson shall note for the record that the Member has submitted a notification and description of the need to attend the meeting by teleconference under the “Just Cause” exception; or made a request and description to be permitted to attend by teleconference under the “Emergency Circumstances” exception.
b. If the Member has not made their notification or request in writing prior to the meeting: The Chairperson shall prompt the Member make their notification of the need to attend the meeting by teleconference, and description of the circumstances giving rise to the need under the “Just Cause” exception; or make their request to be permitted to attend by teleconference, and description of the circumstances giving rise to the need under the “Emergency Circumstances” exception.
c. If the Member makes a request to be permitted to attend by teleconference under “Emergency Circumstances” exception, whether before or during the meeting:
i. Any Member present in person may move to add an item of business to the agenda on an urgency basis to allow the legislative body to act on the Member’s request. If no motion is forthcoming, the Chairperson shall so move. Such action shall comply with Government Code Section 54954.2(b). ii. Thereafter, the Chairperson shall ask the remaining Members to either approve or deny the request. Any Member may move approval or denial, Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-12

but if no motion is forthcoming, the Chairperson shall so move. Members shall consider the request in good faith and shall not capriciously deny the request. The request shall be deemed approved if at least a majority (at least 2 of 3, or 3 of 4) of the Members present in person consent. d. The Chairperson shall, finally, prompt the Member to disclose the presence of any other individuals over the age of 18 in the room at the Member’s remote location, and the general nature of the individual’s relationship to the Member.

Notwithstanding any other provision, this disclosure shall be made on record during the meeting.

D. If the Member is not present on the teleconference platform; if the Member refuses to make the required requests or disclosures; or if the Member’s request to attend under the “Emergency Circumstances” exception is made but not approved, the Member shall be recorded as absent. (Refer to Failure to Comply, below.) E. This process shall be repeated for each Member not present in person who does, or may, wish to attend the meeting by teleconference.

F. The Chairperson shall then prompt the Meeting Clerk to proceed to attendance roll call.

2. In the event the Chairperson wishes to attend a meeting by teleconference, the Vice- Chairperson, if present in person, shall be responsible for performing the Chairperson’s duties as outlined above. Thereafter, the teleconferenced Chairperson may chair the remainder of the meeting, or may ask that the Vice-Chairperson do so.

3. In the event both the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson wish the attend the meeting by teleconference; or in the event the Chairperson wishes to attend by teleconference and the Vice-Chairperson is absent, an Acting Chairperson shall be selected from among the Members attending the meeting in person, in order to perform the Chairperson’s duties as outlined above.

4. In the event three (3) or more Members attempt to join a meeting by teleconference; and/or in the event two (2) or fewer Members are present in person at the meeting location; staff shall announce that the meeting cannot be convened.

IX. Failure to Comply; Enforcement Measures.

1. In the event a Member attempts to attend a meeting by teleconference in excess of the allowable number of times per year; in excess of three consecutive months; without making the necessary notices, requests, or disclosures; or if the Member’s request to attend under the “Emergency Circumstances” exception is made but not approved, the Chairperson shall, at the start of the meeting prior to the attendance roll call, ask the remaining legislative body members for concurrence to disallow the Member’s attendance at the meeting.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-13

After such concurrence, staff shall permit the Member to remain on the teleconference platform, but shall demote the Member to a passive attendee, and note the Member as absent for the attendance roll call, and in the meeting record.

2. Repeated inability or refusal to comply with the provisions of this policy, or related laws, may be grounds for consideration of dismissal of an Advisory Body Member by the City Council.

3. In the event a Member’s inability or refusal to attend a meeting by teleconference in compliance with this policy, or related laws, results in the Member being recorded as absent from the meeting, existing policies and laws regulating legislative body member absences (including Bylaw provisions for Advisory Body Members, and Government Code Section 36513 for Council Members) shall apply.

X. Other Compliance Measures.

In addition to the above provisions relating the conduct of legislative body members, whenever at least one Member attends a meeting by teleconference under AB 2449, staff shall be responsible for other applicable compliance measures, including but not necessarily limited to the following:

1. Staff shall assure that each posted agenda provides, and describes, means by which all members of the public may observe or attend the meeting and offer public comment, including a means to attend via teleconference platform.

2. Staff shall assure that members of the public are allowed to make public comment in real time during all allotted public comment periods, and shall give sufficient time for interested parties to indicate their interest in speaking, and unmute their devices, in order to allow them to comment via the teleconference platform.

3. Meeting proceedings shall be suspended in the event of a disruption that prevents the transmittal of meeting video and audio to members of the public via the teleconference platform; or in the event of a disruption within the City’s control that prevents members of the public from making public comments via the teleconference platform. The legislative body shall take no further action on agenda items until public access to the meeting via teleconference platform is restored. If access cannot be restored within a reasonable amount of time, the Chairperson, or staff in the absence of the Chairperson, shall announce that the meeting is adjourned to a future date and the adjournment shall be noticed in accordance with the Brown Act.

4. Staff shall give notice of, and implement, a procedure for swiftly resolving requests for reasonable accommodations for individuals with disabilities.

5. All votes taken at a meeting where any Member attends by teleconference under the provisions of AB 2449 shall be taken by roll call vote.

Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-14

XI. Conflict Between Law and Policy.

In the event this policy conflicts with applicable state law, as exists or may be amended in the future, state law shall control, and the validity of the remaining sections of this policy shall be unaffected.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach that this Resolution shall sunset and be deemed rescinded on January 1, 2026, if not rescinded prior to that date. Notwithstanding the prior sentence, in the event AB 2449 is extended to apply to meetings after January 1, 2026, this Resolution shall be deemed to extend to conform to the extended date identified in any extension of AB 2449.

UPON MOTION OF Council Member , seconded by Council Member , the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Pismo Beach this 21st day of March 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSED:

Approved: Attest:
________________________ ________________________
Ed Waage, Mayor Erica Inderlied, City Clerk
Council Agenda 3-21-2023 12.D-15

Pismo Beach City CouncilMarch 21, 2023

Pismo Beach City Council
March 21, 2023