Cities Index.
12.A Presentation SLOCOG Transportation Expenditure Plan Input 2025-12-16

Pismo Beach City Council
December 16, 2025

Document
12.A Presentation SLOCOG Transportation Expenditure Plan Input 2025-12-16
Meeting
December 16, 2025
Body
Pismo Beach City Council
Pages
15
Original file
5 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

Draft
SLOCOG’s Draft Transportation Expenditure Plan and
Implementation Guidelines
Dec. ‘25/Jan. ‘26

Introduction to SLOCOG
Founded
in 1968
San Luis Obispo County & 7 Cities
Arroyo Grande
Atascadero
Grover Beach
Morro Bay
Paso Robles
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo
12 Member
Elected-Board
2 US 101 South County
Southbound through Shell Beach – Funded!!
No funding to go further
Northbound – no funding
Interchanges – no funding
US 101 North County
Northbound – no funding
Southbound – no funding
Interchanges – no funding
3 Highway investment is needed
3 Funding Approach: Central Coast Counties
Region ‘18 STIP
(1 Yr)
‘22 STIP
(1 Yr)
‘26 STIP
(1 Yr)
Transp-
Tax
(2024)
Santa Cruz $4M $2.3M $1.9M $24.4M
Monterey $7.1M $3.9M $3.4M $34.8M
Santa Barbara $8.4M $4.6M $4.1M $48.9M
SLO $7.5M $4.1M $3.6M $0
4 The Solution: Central Coast Counties
Currently, 25 Counties (89% of
Californians) HAVE a Voter -
approved Transportation Tax
Region Collected
(’16-pres)
Grants
Won
Santa Cruz $196M $350M
Monterey $277M $227M
Santa Barbara $458M $759M
SLO $0 $0
Lost out on $270M $430M
5 6
Engagement Activities
Engagement & Input
Public
Presentations – ongoing
Online Tool – ongoing
Focus Groups – Aug. 2025
7 Community Workshops – Oct. 2025
1,000 Phone/Internet Polling – Fall 2025
Topic Specific
City Managers/County CEO / Staff
Transit Providerswww. LocalRoadsFirst.com
70+ public meetings
12/10/25 Item F-2: Supplemental Funding
Flexibility: priorities differ
Guarantees: appropriate spending
Assurances: $ will benefit them

7 37%
39%
9%
10%
4%
Great need
Some need
A little need
No real need
Don’t know/No answer
41%
33%
12%
11%
3%
Great/Some Need 76%
A Little/No Real Need23%
Great/Some Need 74%
A Little/No Real Need20%
There is a high, but somewhat soft sense that the transportation systems Countywide and in voters’ own areas have a need for additional funding.

Generally speaking, would you say that San Luis Obispo County has a great need, some need, a little need or no real need for additional funding for the County’s transportation system, including US101, highways, local streets, bike lanes, sidewalks and public transit? Do you think your area has a great need, some need,a little need or no real need for additional funding forthe transportation system, including US101, highways, local streets, bike lanes, sidewalks and public transit? 1,000+ responses; phone/text/email; +/-3.1%

8 40%
18%
6%
4%
5%
23%
4%
Q. Do you think you would vote yes or no on this measure? Initial Vote After Information
35%
20%
6%
3%
7%
26%
4%
Definitely yes
Probably yes
Undecided, lean yes
Undecided, lean no
Probably no
Definitely no
Undecided
Total Yes61%Total Yes65%55%58%
Total No35%Total No32%
After information, support for the measure nearly reaches the two-thirds threshold.
(M.O.E. = ±3.1%)
1,000+ responses; phone/text/email; +/-3.1%

9 DRAFT San Luis Obispo County Transportation Expenditure Plan ½% Sales tax generates ~ $35M/yr
55% ($19.25M) Local Road Repairs, Safety, & Improvements Population Basis to each jurisdiction
Each Governing Board sets own priorities (Local Control and Flexibility) – requires public input – every 2 years in CIP Only for Transportation

10 DRAFT San Luis Obispo County Transportation Expenditure Plan ½% Sales tax generates ~ $35M
40% ($14.00M) Regional Corridor
Improvements
Population Basis to each subregion
SLOCOG Board sets priorities – requires public input – every 2 years in CIP- Only for Transportation

11 DRAFT San Luis Obispo County Transportation Expenditure Plan ½% Sales tax generates ~ $35,000,000

How will $ be spent? (Before spending)
How were $ spent (After spending)
To Augment transportation funds
Oversight and Guarantees requirements
12 Draft Implementation Guidelines and Safeguards

13 What is the Cost?

Dec. 10, 2025: SLOCOG Board – Reviewed Draft Investment Plan and Guidelines; Sent to Cities/BOS Dec. 2025 -Jan. 2026: 7 Cities and County Review Draft Investment Plan Feb. 4, 2026: SLOCOG Board – Review/Approve Final Measure Materials, Introduce Ordinance Feb. 2026 –Mar. 2026: 7 Cities and County Consider Approval of Plan Apr. 1, 2026: SLOCOG Board – Consider Adoption of Ordinance with Measure Materials; Send to Ballot Nov. 3, 2026: Election Day / Voter-Consideration of Measure Fail -> No Change
Pass -> Delivers Expenditure Plan
Other/Future Election
14 Schedule and Next Steps

15

← All documents from this meeting