Cities Index.
12.C Report Downtown Strategic Plan Review 2026-03-17

Pismo Beach City Council
March 17, 2026

Document
12.C Report Downtown Strategic Plan Review 2026-03-17
Meeting
March 17, 2026
Body
Pismo Beach City Council
Pages
27
Original file
67 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

PISMO BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAF REPOR
Agenda Item 12.C
Meeting Date: March 17, 2026

TITLE:

Downtown Strategic Plan Review
RECOMMENDATION:

Receive a report on the Downtown Strategic Plan (DTSP) and other associated plans and provide direction to staff on whether to update the DTSP, implement one or more existing action items, or pursue other downtown improvements not identified in the plans.

DISCUSSION:

The adopted City Council Goals for Fiscal Years 2026–2027 include a Parking and Circulation goal to “enhance parking infrastructure, expand inventory, and improve traffic circulation.” The first priority under this goal is to update the Downtown Study.

To assist the City Council in evaluating next steps, staff prepared the spreadsheet included as Attachment 1. The spreadsheet identifies action items from four planning documents: the 2014 Downtown Strategic Plan (DTSP), 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, 2023 Parking Management Plan, and the 2026 Draft Circulation Element.

For each item, the spreadsheet provides a brief description and its current status (completed, in progress, or not completed). The Draft Circulation Element updates the June 2018 Circulation Element by removing completed projects and retaining those that are Not Complete or currently In Progress.

In reviewing DTSP, staff also evaluated the other three planning documents because they include action items applicable to the downtown area. Collectively, the four plans contain approximately 200 action items, of which 95 have not yet been implemented. The spreadsheet provides Council with a consolidated overview of these long-range planning actions and their status to support discussion of potential priorities for the downtown area.

Pending direction from the City Council, an updated Downtown Strategic Plan could include an evaluation of the remaining plan items, and sequencing of those items, including any other items that are requested to be evaluated.

The staff presentation will include the various discussion points in this report, as well as allow for other input by the City Council to help direct further action items by the City Council.

Options for Council Consideration

1. Update the Downtown Strategic Plan (DTSP).

2. Review the DTSP, Parking Management Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, and Draft Circulation Element and direct staff to implement one or more existing action items. Examples of potential implementation items include:

Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-1

Downtown Strategic Plan
Develop street terminus features for streets that end with ocean views (4.2.1). Consider creating an outdoor paseo on Cypress Street by closing it to vehicle traffic and expanding outdoor dining opportunities (4.2.6). Establish a bike share program (6.2.4).
Develop a plan to extend the Promenade north from Main Street to the Cypress Street stairs (6.2.3). This project is also identified in the other planning documents.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Develop bicycle/pedestrian wayfinding signage for downtown – which could provide direction to the Monarch Butterfly Grove, Pismo Lakes, the Pismo Preserve, Dinosaur Caves Parks, Outlets, Avila Beach, and Grover Beach.

Parking Management Plan
Extend paid parking hours from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
Establish a shared electric bike network with docking and charging stations.

Draft Circulation Element
Convert the Cypress Street bridge to pedestrian and bicycle use only. Add bicycle parking and seating on the east side of Price Street. Expand short-term bicycle parking throughout downtown to encourage cycling.

The items listed above are intended to provide a starting point for Council discussion and are not the only options available. The Council may also direct staff to study and implement other improvements in the downtown area that are not identified in the plans listed above. For example, one potential improvement not included in the plans is studying the closure of Pomeroy Avenue to vehicle traffic and converting the street into a pedestrian paseo (plaza), and the related impacts and recommendations as a result of such a proposal.

Conclusion and Recommendation
In response to the City Council’s interest in updating the Downtown Strategic Plan (DTSP), staff has prepared a spreadsheet identifying action items from four key long- range planning documents that apply wholly or partially to the downtown area. Staff recommends that the City Council review the information in this report and the attached spreadsheet and provide direction on whether to proceed with updating the DTSP, implement one or more existing action items, or pursue other downtown improvements not identified in the plans.

Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-2

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact related to this report. Depending on the direction provided by the City Council, staff can prepare and return with cost estimates for the City Council’s consideration.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Downtown Plan Update Spreadsheet
Submitted by:

Scot Graham, Community Development Director
City Manager Approval:

Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-3

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Brief Description Status Notes Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.1 Street Terminus Features ocean views at street termini

NOT COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.2 Slides Cypress St next to stairs

COMPLETED
reinvisioned
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.3 Gateways into downtown IN PROGRESS/ PROPOSED placed at Price and Dolliver. New gateway feature will be installed with
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.4 Addie Street Terminus lot (Tent City camping, etc
lot with palm trees, new
restroom and surfer changing IN PROGRESS/ PROPOSED
improvements are in process.

Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.5 Pathways and Paseos pathways downtown w/

COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.6 Outdoor Dining transforming areas like Cypress Street into

NOT COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 4 (Built Environment): Placemaking (4.2)4.2.7 Price Street to Beach Connections Price Street to beach IN PROGRESS/ PROPOSED has been done, and light pole Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.1 Beach Access pier plaza by adding stepped

COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.2 Flex Space in the pier plaza that accommodates events and

COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.3 Monument Letters COMPLETED Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.4 Ferris Wheel plaza, "homage" to 1890's

NOT COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.5 Temp or Permanent Cabanas NOT COMPLETED Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.6 Splash Pad NOT COMPLETED Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.7 Showers and Restrooms beach access at either end of pier plaza. Includes "surfer

COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Plaza Features (5.3)5.3.8 Landscaping and Trees pier plaza (palm trees ex.

COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-4

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Brief Description Status Notes Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Pier Improvements (5.4)5.4.1 Pier Lighting COMPLETED Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Pier Improvements (5.4)5.4.2 Pier Diamond Structure diamond that could host

NOT COMPLETED
first diamond on the pier as Open
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 5 (Pier Plaza, Long Term): Pier Improvements (5.4)5.4.3 Vending leave space for airstream
trailers to host food vendors,
etc.

COMPLETED
along with visitor cener trailer. 2nd
food vendng traile removed based on
OS determinaton for first pier
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Pedestrian & Bike Circulation (6.2)6.2.1 Bike Boulevard safety and comfort through
traffic calming and signage,
while maintaining access for
local vehicles.

NOT COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Pedestrian & Bike Circulation (6.2)6.2.2 Pedestrian and Bike Bridge Pismo Creek bridge on
Cypress Street to enhance

COMPLETED
pedesrian traffic from vehicle traffic
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Pedestrian & Bike Circulation (6.2)6.2.3 Promenade Extensions NOT COMPLETED Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Pedestrian & Bike Circulation (6.2)6.2.4 Bike Share NOT COMPLETED Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Pedestrian & Bike Circulation (6.2)6.2.5 Shuttle Program utilize a shuttle taking people to and from downtown

NOT COMPLETED
Avila to Pismo May through August.

We don't have an City shuttle.

Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Streetscape (6.3)6.3.1 Price Street landscaped medians, palm

COMPLETED
Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Streetscape (6.3)6.3.2 Dolliver Street/Highway 1 streetscape to strengthen its
role as a key connector
through Downtown Pismo, by
trees, wider sidewalks, and
upgraded intersections.IN PROGRESS/ PROPOSED
a project by project basis, otherwise
not yet done. We should add
landscaping to the Main St parking
lot as an example of this. Progress
Cal Trans but City is in process of
Hwy 1 acquisition
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-5

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Brief Description Status Notes Downtown Strategic Plan, Chapter 6 (Circulation & Parking): Streetscape (6.3)6.3.3 Main Street, Pomeroy Ave, Hinds Ave such as banners and/or
flower baskets on street
lights, sand-blasted patterns
in the pavement leading to
the pier, planters at
intersections, and sidewalk
widening where feasible.

COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-6

Long Range Document Project Goal & Page #Brief Description User / Future Uses (age, bike or ped, commuter or recreational)
Status Notes Bike Path Classifications
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
5-6, Pismo Creek Trail/ Price Canyon Trail - Improve recreation and commuting access from northern neighborhoods to the city core connecting the Pismo Promenade to Price Historic Park, eventually linking
with County Price Canyon trails.
pedestrian, all ages).PROPOSED PLANS been completed .

Class I
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
5-6 City Wide Class I Multi use Trail - Create a safe, family-friendly multi-use route through the city and connect to Bob Jones Trail through Pismo to El Portal, connecting to Ira Lease Park and
Pismo Creek Trail; may
replace/upgrade existing Class II
lanes.

PROPOSED PLANS been completed.

Class II
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
5-7 Cave Landing Trail - Extend coastal trail connectivity to Avila Beach Class I trail from Bluffs Drive past Pirate’s Cove to Avila Beach, linking
to the Bob Jones Trail and future
coastal trail networks.
ages).

COMPLETED Class III
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
5-7 James Way to Frady Lane Class I - Provide an alternative east-west recreational route across Pismo neighborhoods to Frady Lane, with
potential alignments near Pismo
Creek or the railroad.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
5-7 Dolliver Street/ Hwy 1 Separated Bikeway - Improve regional trail connectivity with Grover Beach.side of Hwy 1 connecting Grover
Beach Class I path to Pismo Creek
Trail.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
5-8 Mattie to Bello Class I Connector - Provide a safe frontage road for regional cycling Class I bikeway from Bello Road to Mattie Road exit, connecting to other
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
Class II Upgrades: Mattie Road, northeast side Add Class II lane on northeast side and improve striping on southwest users).

COMPLETED
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
Class II Upgrades: Oak Park Boulevard Add Class II bike lanes from Pismo’s northeast edge to Hwy 101 at Grover users).PROPOSED PLANS Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
Bicycle Boulevard Provide downtown alternative to Hwy
1 for bikes. Bike-prioritized street
from Dolliver to Hinds Avenue.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
Inland Arterial Class II Serve northeastern Pismo’s future growth and connect Oak Park to Price confident).

NOT COMPLETED
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, Chapter 5 (Projects):

Proposed Bikeway Projects, pgs (5-6) - (5-10)
Class III Upgrades (Various Locations Outlined) •(Incomplete) Sign existing Class III bikeways on El Portal Drive and Indio Drive (consistent with Circulation and Land Use Elements).
•(Incomplete) Sign existing Class III on Windward Avenue and Placentia Avenue (consistent with Circulation Element).
•(Incomplete) Create Class III on Vista Del Mar to maintain continuity of bikeways when path and/or road are unavailable along Pacific Ocean.
•(Incomplete) Create connected Class III bikeway along Coburn, through Spyglass Park, onto Spyglass Drive. South Dolliver adjacent to Promenade III – upgrade paving to match the street.
•(Maybe) Bike/Pedestrian along Highway 101 – addition of lighting. •(Incomplete) Way-finding/directional signs at critical intersections indicating appropriate cyclist/pedestrian action.

NOT COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-7

Long Range Document Project Goal & Page #Brief Description User / Future Uses (age, bike or ped, commuter or recreational)
Status Notes Bike Path Classifications
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-13 Promenade V Multi-use path from Main St. to Harloe St. along the ocean bluffs. Continues
Promenade I–IV, connecting
northwest hotels to Downtown/Pier
and Grover Beach
Extension of a key regional trail.

Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-14 Future Spindrift Park Blufftop Trail Spindrift area, to be created with Coastal Trail.

NOT COMPLETED
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-15 Coastal Bridge Shorecliff Lodge and Lighthouse
Suites, leading to beach access at
Seacrest Hotel
a gap in the California Coastal Trail.

COMPLETED
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-16 Pismo Juan Batista DeAnza Trail Recreational, pedestrian, mountain
bike.

Future: Adds interpretive and historic value to
regional trail network.

PROPOSED PLANS
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-17 Freeway Foothills Trail connecting Mattie Rd and Pismo
Heights. Class I paved or
Future: Potential link to future Bob Jones Trail.

NOT COMPLETED
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-18 Coastal Ridge Trail along the ridge to city limits. Access
from future Foothills Trail and
annexed areas.

Future: Part of hillside trail network.

COMPLETED
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-19 Inland Foothills Trail annexed areas to Pismo Creek.

Access from Highland, Ventana,
Ridge Rd.

Future: Expands inland trail access in hilly terrain.

NOT COMPLETED
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-20 Ebb Tide Beach Access 1 Beach access next to the Cliffs Hotel. coastal access and part of the California Coastal

COMPLETED
Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-21 North Spyglass Beach Access Beach access at Spyglass Park.NOT COMPLETED Proposed Pedestrian Facilities, 5-11 - 5-22 Ebb Tide Beach Access 2 2801 Shell Beach Rd if developed.Coastal Trail integration.

NOT COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-8

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Brief Description Status Notes COMPLETED NOT COMPLETED IN PROGRESS/ PROPOSED PLANS Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.)Implement a "Integrated" Parking Plan (pg23) Develop a comprehensive strategy that balances parking supply, demand, and multimodal access for residents, visitors and businesses.

COMPLETED https://cityofpismobeach-
my.sharepoint.com/:p:/g/personal/osample_pism
obeach_org/EQADmgVn8TVPvYwaXu7Hi8wB2pm
SLkiOUfrJaz_-
tHKHVQ?e=pb7Qv8&nav=eyJzSWQiOjI4OCwiY0lk
IjoxNzUwMDg0MTQwfQ
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Expand Paid Parking and Utilize Demand-Based
Pricing Based on Seasons demand. Expand paid zones incrementally outward from the pier using demand-based pricing (e.g., higher summer rates, lower off-season rates).

In Progress
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Off-Street Public Parking - Address Free Parking
Issues (pg24-25)
Discourage long term parking and cruising by by converting high-demand free lots (Addie Street) into paid parking. *Work w/ Coastal Comission for necessary approvals.

NOT COMPLETED
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Extend Paid Parking Enforcement Hours
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Establish Fair Residential Parking Solutions

COMPLETED
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Regulate Vacation Rental Parking
must pay for public parking, discouraging excessive vehicle use

COMPLETED
spaces allocated for parking (Nov 2023)
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Manage Employee Parking Effectively &
Mantaining Special Permit Parking (pg. 26-27)

NOT COMPLETED
owner and employees
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Unlock Underutilized Private Parking
(Recommendations listed on pg.28 of different temporary access to these spaces (e.g., weekend agreements).

NOT COMPLETED
City events to allow use of private parking lots
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Plan for Long-Term Shuttle Services
frequency and reliability. Consider ride-hail subsidies (e.g., Uber/Lyft) as a more cost-

NOT COMPLETED
Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Promote E-Bike Share Programs
reduce parking demand and supports sustainable transportation access to Downtown.

NOT COMPLETED
guest use.

Parking Management Plan (October 2023) Recommended
Parking Management Strategies (Pg23-Cont.) Extension of Boardwalk
hotels. This idea may provide a direct and convenient connection to the downtown area with ocean views, ultimately encouraging guests of the hotels to keep their cars parked at the hotel - alleviating downtown congestion

NOT COMPLETED
not done., but not sure if the action is referring
to just a feasility study or actual boardwalk
constrution
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-9

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Circulation Element (2023 Updated
Version)Circulation Element (2023 Updated Version)Circulation Element (2023 Updated Version)

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
Frady Lane Realignment
Straightens the road near the Pismo Beach Sports
under US 101 and a bike/pedestrian ramp
connecting to the nearby path.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
Dolliver/Price/US 101 SB Off-Ramp
Install a roundabout or signal with crosswalks, a
multi-use path, and improved connections to bike
routes. A new SB on-ramp may be added with the
Price Street extension.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
Bello & Price Canyon
Convert the intersection to a signal or roundabout
with minor realignment. Construction planned for

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
Stimson/Ocean View Couplet
Convert to one-way streets: Ocean View

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
Cypress Street Bridge
Restrict motorized vehicles; allow only
pedestrians, bikes, small electric vehicles,
emergency, and event traffic. May start with a trial

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
Pismo Creek Crossing Alternatives
Three options to improve access across Pismo
Creek and reduce US 101 congestion:
a. James Way to Price Canyon b.

James Way to Price Street c. Price

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel and Safety
5 Cities Drive
Adjust signal timing at key intersections and add a
westbound right-turn lane at 5 Cities Dr & 4th St to

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
Dolliver Street (Highway 1) Improvements (The City takeover is expected to occur in July or August of 2026. After the relinquishment has occurred, the following improvements will be considered)
Add a pedestrian scramble at Dolliver & Pomeroy,
allowing diagonal and all-way crossings during a
pedestrian-only phase. Improves safety and
reduces traffic delays. Can be deactivated in off-

NOT COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-10

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status

2.2 Multimodal Travel
Traffic Signals & Stop Signs
New signls:

Dolliver & Stimson
Dolliver & Ocean View
New all-way stop:

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.2 Proposed Bicycle Facility Improvements

2.2 Multimodal Travel CLASS I PROPOSED
A separate multi-use trail along the west side of
Shell Beach Road from the northern City limits to

IN PROGRESS

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike paths are separated from roadways with few road crossings. A Class 1 example is the Pismo Creek Trail in the eastern portion of the City.The multi-use trail should continue along the east side of Shell Beach Road from Spyglass Drive to
Cliff Avenue (replacing Class II Bike Lanes) IN PROGRESS

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike paths are separated from roadways with few road crossings. A Class 1 example is the Pismo Creek Trail in the eastern portion of the City.Pismo Creek/Price Canyon Trail; continue north and provide connection to Dolliver Street NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike paths are separated from roadways with few road crossings. A Class 1 example is the Pismo Creek Trail in the eastern portion of the City.Continue to provide Citywide connectivity for the Cave Landing Trail and the California Coastal Trail IN PROGRESS

2.2 Multimodal Travel bike paths are separated from roadways with few road crossings. A Class 1 example is the Pismo Creek Trail in the eastern portion of the City.James Way to Frady Lane connection

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike paths are separated from roadways with few road crossings. A Class 1 example is the Pismo Creek Trail in the eastern portion of the City.Mattie Road to Bello Street Connector

2.2 Multimodal Travel CLASS II PROPOSED Extend bike lanes along both sides of Shell Beach

IN PROGRESS

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike lanes are clearly marked with stripes and bicycle symbols, providing designated space for cyclists on the roadway. Most of the city's bike lanes fall into this category, running along Shell Beach Road, Mattie Road, parts of Price Street, and the full length of Dolliver Street.

At Shell Beach Road/Spyglass Drive, add Class II
bike lane striping east of the intersection, separate
bike crossings from pedestrian ones on the south
Mattie Road bike lane.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike lanes are clearly marked with stripes and bicycle symbols, providing designated space for cyclists on the roadway. Most of the city's bike lanes fall into this category, running along Shell Beach Road, Mattie Road, parts of Price Street, and the full length of Dolliver Street.

At Dolliver Street/Village Drive, marked bicycle
the north side of the intersection with appropriate
signage directing cyclists to the multiuse path on
the west side of Dolliver Street. NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike lanes are clearly marked with stripes and bicycle symbols, providing designated space for cyclists on the roadway. Most of the city's bike lanes fall into this category, running along Shell Beach Road, Mattie Road, parts of Price Street, and the full length of Dolliver Street.

Extend along both sides of Price Canyon Road and
connections to Downtown.

IN PROGRESS

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bike lanes are clearly marked with stripes and bicycle symbols, providing designated space for cyclists on the roadway. Most of the city's bike lanes fall into this category, running along Shell Beach Road, Mattie Road, parts of Price Street, and the full length of Dolliver Street.

Oak Park Boulevard at US 101 (City Limits to El
Camino Real)

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel CLASS III PROPOSED
On Main Street, Pomeroy Avenue, Hinds Avenue,
and Addie Street to link with existing Class III
routes on Cypress Street and the Promenade, as
Dolliver Street has high traffic volumes.NOT COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-11

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bikeways are unmarked road sections commonly found on
neighborhood streets with low traffic volumes. These roads are typically too vehicles. Their main purpose is to connect Class I (off-street paths) and Class II (marked bike lanes), helping create a continuous and accessible Add bike route signage on El Portal Drive, Indio
Drive, Windward Avenue, Placentia Avenue, Vista
Del Mar Avenue, Coburn Lane, and Spyglass Drive.

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel CLASS IV PROPOSED
The City should work with Caltrans to add either a
two-way separated or Class II bike lanes on Price
Street and improve pavement markings for cyclist

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bikeways provide a separate travel way that is designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to the roadway and are protected from vehicular traffic. Types of separation include, but are not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, physical barriers, or on-street parking.

A two-way, separate bicycle lane should be
incorporated along the west side of Dolliver Street
from Price Street to Main Street. NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bikeways provide a separate travel way that is designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to the roadway and are protected from vehicular traffic. Types of separation include, but are not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, physical barriers, or on-street parking.

Consider adding bike-protected intersections at
key intersections such as Dolliver Street at Hinds
Avenue. NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
bikeways provide a separate travel way that is designated exclusively for bicycle travel adjacent to the roadway and are protected from vehicular traffic. Types of separation include, but are not limited to, grade separation, flexible posts, physical barriers, or on-street parking.

Provide a buffered bike lane on each side of Mattie
Road where possible, otherwise provide Class II
Bike Lanes. NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel CYPRESS ST. BIKE BOULEVARD
As suggested in the Downtown Strategic Plan,
convert Cypress Street into a bicycle boulevard
(i.e., a street where bicycles have the right-of-way
over vehicles). The conversion would have
pavement striping indicating that Cypress Street is
a bicycle boulevard; however, no forced vehicle
traffic diversions will be implemented on Cypress
Street. Reducing the speed limit to 20 miles per
hour should also be considered by the City, which
will reduce the speed differential between

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel
Bicycle Boulevards are streets designed to prioritize bicycle travel and safety by reducing traffic speed and volume, discouraging non- local traffic, giving bikes right-of-way at intersections, providing safe

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Add bicycle parking and seating near scenic view
corridors along Shell Beach Road south of El Portal
connections.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Consider adding bicycle parking and
pedestrian/bike amenities on the east side of Price
Street, especially where space widens near ramps.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Provide long-term bicycle parking near transit
hubs, schools, and workplaces for users who leave

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES Provide short-term bicycle parking for users stopping briefly to shop, eat, or run errands.

NOT COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-12

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Install bike parking facilities, including lockers and
showers, at City parking lots, park & ride lots,
transit centers, and commercial and residential
areas—especially Downtown where on-street
parking is limited.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Support development of boardwalks, recreational,
and multi-use trails connecting scenic and key
destinations, promoting walking and equestrian
travel, in line with the 2014 SLO County Regional
Transportation Plan.NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel OTHER PROPOSED BIKE FACILITIES
Collaborate with SLO Regional Rideshare to offer
Transportation Choices Programs for City

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.3 Proposed Pedestrian Facility Improvements Promenade V
Extend Boardwalk/Promenade from Main Street to

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.3 Proposed Pedestrian Facility Improvements Spindrift Park Blufftop Trail
As part of California Coastal Trail, Implement with

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.3 Proposed Pedestrian Facility Improvements Freeway Foothills Trail
Implement Freeway Foothills Trail, Wadsworth

NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.3 Proposed Pedestrian Facility Improvements Ebb Tide Beach Access
Improve Ebb Tide Beach Access from Shell Beach
Road. The incorporation of decorative paving
treatments and provide separate markings for NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.3 Proposed Pedestrian Facility Improvements Downtown Crosswalks
Within the downtown area, enhancements of
existing crosswalks should include decorative
pavers and/or markings to enhance the walkability
and beautification of the street scene. NOT COMPLETED

2.2 Multimodal Travel 2.2.3 Proposed Pedestrian Facility Improvements Pedestrian Enhancements
Where appropriate, raised sidewalks, decorative
pavers, and ADA crosswalk upgrades should be
incorporated to improve and enhance the existing
or proposed pedestrian infrastructure and safety
throughout the City.

Within the downtown pedestrian core, continue to
incorporate pedestrian amenities such as benches
to enhance walkability, as needed.

NOT COMPLETED

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-13

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1
Policy CE-1.1 supports a safe, efficient road
system through a well-planned local network.

Action CE-1.1a calls for using the Circulation Plan
to guide phased roadway improvements as
development occurs, ensuring roads meet future
traffic needs. Alignment changes based on
engineering studies won’t require plan
amendments. The City also aims to take control of

IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1.2 residential, and total VMT to achieve State-

IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1.3
better for roadways and intersections outside
Downtown during weekday PM peak hours,
allowing lower service levels during weekends,
Action CE-1.2a requires new developments that
worsen conditions to LOS D or below to provide
transportation improvements, including
enhancements to non-auto modes, to offset
Action CE-1.2b mandates that new and IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1.4
Sets a goal of achieving a multimodal LOS “D” or
better in Downtown during non-summer weekday
peak hours, while allowing lower LOS during
weekends, holidays, and peak tourist seasons to
preserve Pismo Beach’s character. With planned
improvements, Downtown intersections are
expected to meet this standard.

Action CE-1.3a requires new Downtown
developments that worsen LOS to “E” or below to
implement transportation improvements, including
enhancements to non-automobile modes, to offset
impacts.

IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1.5
Aims to maintain and reduce average regional
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT), aligning with Senate
Bill 743 and state climate guidance.

Action CE-1.5a calls for formally adopting VMT as
the CEQA review standard, including setting
thresholds and mitigation requirements. Action CE-

1.5b requires new development exceeding VMT
thresholds to implement mitigations or adjust
project designs, using state guidance or developing
local thresholds if needed. Action CE-1.5c directs
VMT analysis, including criteria for small projects,
projects near transit, residential and office projects, and affordable housing

IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1.6 (Complete Streets)
Promotes a more balanced multimodal circulation
system that supports safe and accessible travel for
all users—pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and
with California’s Complete Streets Act (AB 1358).
reflect Complete Streets principles, ensuring
compatibility with surrounding land uses and
enhancing connectivity.

IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-14

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Action CE-1.5b: Shell Beach Road/Dolliver Street Support safe, complete and well-connected
neighborhoods for street, bicycle, and pedestrian
access.

Action CE-1.6a calls for modifying the street
network to create direct links between
neighborhoods and commercial areas, including
pedestrian and bicycle paths. Action CE-1.6b
ensures residential areas have direct access to
parks and open space. Action CE-1.6c requires
adding pedestrian crosswalks at all intersection
approaches where feasible. Action CE-1.6d directs
implementation of the City’s ADA Transition Plan.

Action CE-1.6e involves maintaining and updating
the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan to guide the
development of sidewalks, bikeways, trails, and
amenities like resting spots with context-sensitive
design. Action CE-1.6f focuses on continuing the
implementation of the Safe Routes to School Plan,
complementing other pedestrian and accessibility

IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy Goal CE-1.7: Existing Facilities The City aims to use existing transportation
support multimodal travel, following the
Circulation Plan. Enhancements should increase
capacity and be acceptable to the City, residents,
and Caltrans where applicable. However, some
facilities may not meet current standards due to
subject to City Engineer approval.

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy CE-1.8: Regional Travel
Design the City circulation system to discourage
regional traffic from bypassing US 101 and
impacting City streets and frontage roads such as
Shell Beach Road and Price Street. Also,
cooperatively work with regional partners,
including Caltrans and SLOCOG for improvements
along US 101.IN PROGRESS

3.1 Circulation Element Policies and Action
Items (pg CE-24)Policy CE-1.9: Emerging Transportation Technology Promote “green technology” efforts for emerging
technological transportation advancements,
including connected and autonomous vehicles,
emergency vehicle pre-emption, sharing
technology, electric vehicle technology, electric
car, bike and scooter parking and charging
facilities, solar panels, downtown parking
occupancy monitoring and innovative transit
options.IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-15

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Policies for Walking and Bicycling Policy CE-2.1: Promote Walking and Bicycing Promote walking and bicycle riding for
transportation, recreation, commuting, and
improvement of public and environmental health.

Make downtown more functional and enjoyable for
bicyclists and pedestrians. Pedestrian walkways
and bicycle paths shall receive at least the same
emphasis and attention in future planning as
facilities designed for the automobile.

Action CE-2.1a: Integration of Land Use Planning.

Implement land use policies designed to create a
pattern of activity that makes it easy to shop,
recreate, commute, and conduct personal business
without driving.

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.1b: Provision of Bicycle Facilities.

Facilities for bicycle travel (Class I Multi-Use/Bike
shall be provided to complete a continuous system

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.1c: Bikeways Encouraged. Bikeways
shall be encouraged within the City and adjoining
jurisdictions as a complement to Pismo Beach's
visitor and recreation emphasis, to reduce
automobile trips and for the convenience of visitors
and residents. The City's bikeway plan will be
coordinated with the San Luis Obispo Area
Coordinating Council and Regional Transportation
Agency, and the County of San Luis Obispo Regional
Transportation Plan.

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.1d: Bikeways Plan. Bikeways shall be
located and classified as shown in Figure 3
consistent with the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan. To the extent possible, bikeways shall
tie into state routes and routes of adjoining
communities. Permitted land uses adjacent to
bicycle routes and population density and
settlement patterns adjacent to the bikeways are

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.1e: Requires sidewalks for all new
residential (except single-family homes) and
roads by landscaping or trees to enhance the
walking experience. The City promotes pedestrian-
friendly features like quality paving, street furniture, lighting, and flashing beacons at busy crossings. All
sidewalks must be ADA-compliant. Additionally,
sidewalks or footpaths will be installed along
collector and arterial streets connecting
commercial centers, schools, and public areas.

IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-16

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-2.1f: Pedestrian Access to Shopping
Destinations. Install clearly marked crosswalks at
intersections near all commercial uses, as well as
clearly marked pedestrian paths within parking
areas. Mid-block crossings are discouraged.

However, if conditions warrant and are approved by
pedestrian activity should be installed at mid-block
entrances where existing commercial uses are
adjacent to other high intensity uses, such as parks
and schools where necessary for safety. Bulb-outs
should be installed at mid-block crossings. Where
possible, route pedestrians to grade separated
crossings across US 101.

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.1g: Pedestrian Connections to
Employment Destinations. Encourage the
development of a network of continuous walkways
within new commercial, town center, public, and
industrial uses to improve workers’ ability to walk
safely around, to, and from their workplaces. Where
possible, route pedestrians to grade separated

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-2.2: Meet the Needs of All Users
Recognize and meet the mobility needs of persons
using wheelchairs and those with other mobility
limitations, in compliance with the ADA.

Action CE-2.2a: Universal Design. Provide
pedestrian facilities that are accessible to persons
with disabilities and ensure that roadway
improvement projects address accessibility by

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.2b: Children’s Access to Schools. Work
with the Lucia Mar Unified School District to
promote the identification of school attendance

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-2.2c: Pedestrian Connections to Schools.

Continue developing the existing network of
walkways between schools and residential uses,
and encourage the development of new continuous
walkways between schools and residential uses.

Where possible, route pedestrians to grade

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-2.2d: Bicycle Use by City Employees.

Establish a program to encourage bicycle use
among City employees.

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-2.3: Develop a Safe and Efficient Non-Motorized Circulation System
Provide safe and direct pedestrian routes and
bikeways between places.

Action CE-2.3a: Address Bicycle Safety. Assess and
address bicycle safety through implementation of
the City’s Local Roadway Safety Plan. Increase the
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-17

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-2.3b: Bicycle and Pedestrian Access to
Recreation Destinations. Encourage the
development of a network of continuous trails and
Class I paths along the bluffs where feasible.

Continue to provide Citywide connectivity for the
Cave Landing Trail and the California Coastal Trail.

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-2.3c: Bicycling Access to Parks. Provide
safe bicycle access to and from parking facilities at

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-2.4: Maintain and Improve Existing Facilities Maintain and improve existing multimodal
circulation and transportation systems and
facilities, to maximize alternatives to new street
and highway construction. Complete a network of
bicycle lanes and paths, sidewalks and pedestrian
paths within existing developed parts of the City
and extend the system to serve new growth areas.

Action CE-2.4a: Calls for marking Class III bikeways
with “sharrows” to increase driver awareness of
shared roadways, prioritizing areas with frequent
bike-vehicle conflicts or visibility issues, while
ensuring at minimum that Bike Route signage is
installed per state standards.

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-2.4b: Promotes enhancing bikeway
visibility using colored paint, buffer strips, and
visual cues, especially in areas with a history of
collisions. It also supports adding bike-sensitive
signals and protected intersections where feasible,
all subject to City Engineer approval.

NOT COMPLETED
Goals CE-3/Downtown Traffic and Parking (pg CE-
33,34)Policy CE-3.1: Vehicular and Bicycle Parking
Parking for both residents and visitors shall be
provided as part of new development. Additional
designated parking spaces for beach access may
be required as a condition of approval of new hotel
or other commercial development adjacent to the
oceanfront. IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-3.2: In Lieu-Fees
In-lieu fees for commercial uses shall be
encouraged rather than on-site parking in the
central commercial area. In-lieu fees may also be
considered for residential uses where allowed as
ground floor residential dwellings. IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-3.3: Coastal Public Access Parking
New development projects located within one-
quarter mile of the beach or bluff edge shall be
evaluated to assess their impact on the availability
of parking for public access to the coast. If a
project would result in a reduction of shoreline
access parking, the project may be required to
public access.IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-18

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Policy CE-3.4: Bicycle Parking Facilities
The City should provide bike parking at public sites
and require it for new major developments
(condition of approval). Amenities like restrooms,
water, and air stations should be nearby, with
showers and lockers where feasible. Funding may
come from the TIF and align with the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-3.5: Bicycle Parking for Special Events
As a condition of the issuance of a Special Event
permit, the applicant may be required to provide
bicycle parking. Bicycle parking provision may
include “Bike Valet” services provided by SLO
County Bicycle Coalition, other bike valet
organizations, or by event volunteers.NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-3.6: Downtown Traffic and Parking
Discourage traffic in the Downtown area, improve
Downtown parking and drop-off opportunities, and
provide remote parking.

Action CE-3.6a: Bicycles and Trolley System: The
City shall work with the lodging industry to 1)
provide free (or very low rent) bicycles for guests,
and 2) to develop and maintain a trolley system for
summer months, weekends, and special events

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6b: Downtown Parking District.

Consider utilization of existing parking district
mechanisms to finance Downtown or remote
parking and related improvements suggested in the
Downtown Strategic Plan (approved November

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6c: Downtown Strategic Plan. Utilize
the Downtown Strategic Plan to aid in identifying

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6d: Parking Analysis. Examine vacant or
underutilized lots for off-street parking or remote

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6e: Establish Rideshare Zones.

Consider converting public parking spaces to

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6f: Implement Shuttle Program.

Consider implementing a shuttle program between
satellite parking areas and Downtown as a Travel
Demand Management strategy, to relieve traffic
congestion and to reduce parking demand
Downtown. Potential areas for satellite parking
include sites east of the US 101 and to the north and

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-3.6g: Implement Dockless Bike Program.

Consider implementing and installing a Dockless
Bike program throughout the City as a Travel
Demand Management strategy, to relieve traffic
congestion and to reduce parking demand
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-19

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-3.6h: Provide Wayfinding and Parking
signs throughout the City, consider dynamic

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6i: Establish Parking Location Systems.

Add both static and dynamic parking wayfinding
systems including a dynamic system at the pier

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6j: Update Parking Ratios and In-Lieu
Fee Program. Update the City’s Downtown parking
ratios and in-lieu fee program to support new

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6k: Public/Private Partnerships.

Consider Public/Private Partnership opportunities to
expand parking inventory NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-3.6l: Develop Parking Structure. Rezone
and develop parking structures in the Downtown

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-3.6m: Promote E-Bikes at Hotels.

Encourage / Incentivize hotels to provide e-bikes to

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-3.6n: Promote ‘Park-Once’ Strategy.

Promote the ‘park-once’ concept of parking once
and conveniently walking to downtown services,
attractions, and the coast

IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-3.7: Adequate Downtown Parking (pg. 36)
Parking shall be provided within the vicinity of the
Downtown area, day use parking for the beach
should primarily be located at the north or south
end of Downtown rather than at the pier. In order to
assure that development projects will not
adversely affect the availability of existing parking
for shoreline access, an adequate quantity of on-
site parking spaces to serve the full needs of the
development shall be required, except as found
consistent with Policy CE-3.2.Exact parking
standards shall be established by City Ordinance.

IN PROGRESS
Public Transportation (pg. 36)Policy CE-4.1 Promote Safe, Efficient, and Convenient Public Transportation
Promote the use of public transportation for daily
trips, including to schools and workplaces, as well
as other purposes.

Action CE-4.1a: Comprehensive Transit Services.

The City shall support the availability of transit
service as a means to reduce automobile
congestion, to provide transportation for those who
have no other form of transportation, as a means to
reduce air pollution, and as a service to visitors.

Such support should include, but not be limited to,
SCT, Greyhound bus service, vanpools, shuttle bus
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-20

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-4.1b: Downtown Transit Priority Area.

Strive to establish a downtown as a Transit Priority
Area by establishing transit service of two or more
major bus routes with a frequency of 15 minutes or
less during the morning and afternoon peak

NOT COMPLETED
shall encourage and support vanpools and ride
sharing. A special program should be developed in
cooperation with the visitor industry to encourage
vanpools and ride sharing for hotel and related
workers. Appropriate locations shall be designated
for ride share parking lots.

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-4.1d: Transit Services Marketing.

Encourage ridership on public transit systems
through marketing and promotional efforts. Provide
information to residents and employees on transit

IN PROGRESS
community care facilities and senior housing
projects with over 25 beds to provide accessible
transportation services for the convenience of

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-4.1g: Development that Supports Transit.

Ensure that new development is designed to make

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-4.1h: Transit Stop Spacing. Transit stops
should be spaced approximately ¼ mile apart, if
spaced for continuous service on City streets,
consistent with the South County Transit Plan and
SLORTA. Spacing may deviate from the general
standard in industrial areas where individual IN PROGRESS Policy CE-4.2: General Transit and Pedestrian Access
In reviewing designs of proposed developments,
ensure that provision is made for access to current
and future public transit services. In particular,
pedestrian access to arterial and collector streets
from subdivisions should not be impeded by
continuous segments of sound walls.
considerations for arterial streets in newly
unloading without disruption of through-traffic.

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-4.2: Work with Multiple Agencies and Jurisdictions Continue to cooperate with other agencies and
jurisdictions to promote local and regional public
transit.

Action CE-4.2a: Improve Local Transit Operations.

Work with RTA and SCT to continue the present
course of expanding the SCT fixed route services
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-21

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-4.2b: Multimodal Transfer Centers. The
City will continue to work with Caltrans, SCT, RTA,
SLOCOG, and the commuting public to develop
multimodal transfer areas or centers that will
incorporate automobile parking areas, bike parking,
bus, transit, pedestrian bike paths, and park and

NOT COMPLETED
Service. The City will work with appropriate
transportation agencies and major employers to
establish or expand express bus or transit service to
San Luis Obispo and Northern Santa Barbara

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-4.2d: Improvements to Demand
Responsive Transit. Work with SLOCOG to improve
the City’s demand responsive (dial-a-ride) transit
system and aggressively pursue transit grant funds

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-4.2e: Consistency with SLOCOG
Congestion Management Program. Monitor the
frequency, routing and coordination of local transit
services for consistency with the requirements of
the SLOCOG Congestion Management Program
(CMP) and the Corridor System Management Plan
(CSMP). The SLOCOG CMP includes minimum
standards regarding these factors in an effort to
enhance the coordination within the regional

IN PROGRESS
Action CE-4.2f: Funding for Transit Services. Work
with SLORTA and SLOCOG to continue to pursue
federal and State funds to subsidize capital and
operating costs associated with the City’s transit
operation. If federal funds are reduced and capital
TIF through a Nexus Study after a public hearing
Action CE-4.2h: Transit Usability. Work with SLORTA
to situate transit stops at locations that are
convenient for transit users and promote increased
transit ridership through the provision of shelters,

NOT COMPLETED
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-22

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-4.2i: Standards for Transit Stops and
Headways. Coordinate with San Luis Obispo
Regional Transit Authority and South County Transit
to establish citywide standards for bus stop
locations and bus frequencies/headways. In
industrial areas, standards may need to be adjusted
to provide direct access to employee entrances.

IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-4.3: Regional Transit to Support SB 375 Compliance Coordinate with other agencies to implement
regional transit solutions as part of the SB 375
Sustainable Communities Strategy.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-4.4: Coordinate Local and Regional Transit
As the City’s local transit system continues to be
developed, services should be oriented to link with
other potential future commuter bus and/or
commuter rail services. Coordination of
improvements should be consistent with programs
and improvements identified in the SLORTA Short
Range Transit Plan.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-4.5: Support Existing Regional Transit Services Continue to support the Avila Beach Trolley and fixed-route services provided by SCT/SLORTA.IN PROGRESS Policy CE-4.6: Regional Transit Agency efficiency of bus service on a regional level and, if appropriate, the regionalization of transit service

IN PROGRESS
Railroads, Airport Facilities, Goods Movement,
and Truck Routes (pg 39)Policy CE-5.1: Promote Safe and Efficient Goods Movement Promote the safe and efficient movement of goods
via truck and rail with minimum disruptions to
residential areas.

Action CE-5.1a: Hazardous Materials. The truck
101. The City shall request Caltrans to remove State

NOT COMPLETED
Action CE-5.1b: Truck Route Identification.

Designated truck routes shall be Price Canyon
Road, State Route 1, and US 101. The City shall
continue to provide clear signage from regional
gateways to truck routes in the City.IN PROGRESS
Action CE-5.1c: Truck Route Design. Ensure that
truck routes are designed according to California
Legal and where appropriate STAA standards for

IN PROGRESS
Continue industrial expansion in the southeast
industrial area, per the Land Use Element, to
minimize the neighborhood impacts of truck

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-5.2: Promote Railroad Safety.

Minimize the safety problems associated with the
railroad, including the construction and
maintenance of at-grade crossings and the
physical barrier effect of the track alignment on the
City.

Action CE-5.2a: Railroad Crossing Safety. Continue
the ongoing comprehensive program to improve the
condition and safety of existing railroad crossings.

Special consideration must be given to improving

IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-23

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Action CE-5.2b: New Railroad Crossings. Provide
new crossings across the railroad (UPRR) in
conjunction with the planned roadway

NOT COMPLETED
Traffic Operations and Monitoring pg. 42 Policy CE-6.1: Traffic Calming Traffic calming techniques may be employed to
mitigate the traffic effects of new development on
minor and major collector streets. The City shall
adopt and maintain Traffic Calming Handbook
adopted 10/19/2021 for application and design of
traffic calming measures.NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-6.2: Update and Adopt Transportation Impact
Analysis (TIA) Guidelines
Update and adopt Transportation Impact Analysis
guidelines consistent with State Assembly Bill 743
for the evaluation of potential transportation
impacts and local policy inconsistency resulting
from new development.NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-6.3: Impacts of New Development
Based upon the findings of a transportation impact
and policy analysis, new development will be
responsible for mitigation of transportation related
impacts IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-6.4: Traffic and Accident Monitoring & Reduction Implement and update the City’s Local Roadway
Safety Plan to help maintain satisfactory roadway
performance at intersections and along roadway
segments (cont. pg 42).IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-6.5: Manage Traffic and Congestion Suggestions given on pg. 43 Street Design and Character pg. 43 Policy CE-6.6: Landscaping Adjacent to Property Lines When applicable, the property owner may be able
to credit the landscaping in public right-of-way
towards their landscaping requirements on their
property. In return, the property owner is
responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the
landscape frontage.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-6.7: Street Trees
Street trees in landscape strips or parkways must
be placed near enough of the sidewalk to provide
canopy. All street tree planting and maintenance
shall be accomplished in strict accordance with
the City’s Municipal Code Section 12.12 on Street
Trees and Resolution No. R-2003-07 “Tree Policy”,
and conform to the City's "street tree planting
standards" and the City's approved "street tree
list”. Include street trees as part of a project’s
design.

Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-24

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Policy CE-6.8: Street Trees for Shade and Comfort
Ensure that planting plans for street trees take into
consideration shade and comfort for pedestrians
and bicyclists and traffic calming benefits, while
still maintaining public views.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-6.9: New and Redesigned Street Best Practices New and redesigned streets shall consider space
for street trees and best practices for sustainable
street design. This may include design concepts
such as Low Impact Development for water quality
standards and stormwater management, shade
trees, energy efficient and dark sky lighting.IN PROGRESS Policy CE-6.10: Medians IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-6.11: Bike Lane Width Shall Follow State Standards In cases where existing right of way constraints
limit development of Class II facilities, Class III
signage and demarcation may be permitted at the
discretion of the City Engineer. Deviations from
these standards and from the routing shown on the
diagram shall be permitted with the approval of the
City Engineer.NOT COMPLETED
Right of Way Acquisition and Preservation Policy CE-6.12: Establish Roadway Alignments Take appropriate action to establish precise
alignments based on the Circulation Plan and City
Standards, and where appropriate, utilize Caltrans
standards, for all existing and proposed highway,
arterial and collector streets in order to identify
future right-of-way needs. Plan Lines shall be
adopted by the City Council.

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-6.13: Plan Line Studies Included in TIF
Plan Line studies shall be included in TIF costs.

Once Plan Lines are established, new preliminary
cost estimates shall be prepared and the TIF
updated to reflect the revised and finalized costs NOT COMPLETED Policy CE-6.14: Right-of-Way Consistency shall be designed to maintain a consistent street design and right-of-way width, regardless of

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-6.15: Right-of-Way Acquisition
Following the adopted Plan Lines, acquire public
street right-of-way as opportunity for dedication
and/or purchase arises. Attempt to obtain ultimate
right of way and street improvements at the time of
development, except when lesser right-of-way will
avoid significant social, neighborhood or
environmental impacts and perform the same
traffic movement function.IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-25

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Policy CE-6.16: Right-of-Way Fully within Master Plan
Boundaries
Planning areas shall not use roadway centerlines
as boundaries. Roadways shall be built to their full
width within the annexed City Limits. Part-width
roads shall not be permitted where master plan
areas abut unincorporated properties that are not
expected to be annexed to the City within the time
frame of this General Plan. Road rights-of-way that
contained within the development area boundary
and expanded only within that boundary.

NOT COMPLETED
Regional Cooperation and Funding (pg. 45)Policy CE-7.1: Work with Caltrans on Highway Improvements Continue to work with Caltrans to achieve timely
of programmed highway improvements. IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.2: Coordinate Standards
Continue to coordinate the City’s design standards
for regional roadways with the standards of
adjacent and overlapping agencies to provide
smooth transitions for roadway users between
jurisdictional boundaries.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.3: Use of Congestion Management Process
Utilize SLOCOG’s US 101 Corridor Master Plan to
determine the timing and degree of regional
roadway facility improvements in accordance with
regional plans. Actively participate in the US 101
Southbound Pismo Congestion Relief Project
process to identify a funded travel capacity
enhancement for US 101 through the City.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.4: Regional Fair-Share Fee Program
Work with Caltrans, SLOCOG, San Luis Obispo
County, and other jurisdictions to establish a fair-
share fee program for improvements to routes of
regional significance and State highways. This fee
should reflect traffic generated by individual
municipalities/unincorporated communities as
well as pass-through traffic.

IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.5: Transportation Impact Fee (TIF)
The City shall update and maintain a
Transportation Impact Fee Program to provide
based on roadway or intersection improvements
identified in the General Plan and Capital
Improvements Plan. The TIF will provide fees for
new development’s proportional share to fund
construction of the City’s CIP improvements. The
financing program will include an update to the
AB 1600.

IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-26

Long Range Document Implementation Goal & Chapter #Description Action Notes Status Policy CE-7.6: Financing Program: Downtown Parking in Lieu Fee Program
parking facilities such as parking garages to
accommodate anticipated parking requirement
that new development cannot satisfy on-site. The
financing program will include an update to the
AB 1600.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.7: Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
required to be constructed and/or update
circulation facilities. The analysis should identify
the type of facility, right-of-way requirements,
physical improvements required and preliminary
cost estimates. IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.8: Utilize Outside Funding Sources
Link improvement projects to the most current
estimates of available funding from regional, State,
and federal sources. The City shall continue to
regional financing mechanism for major regional
transportation improvement projects that provide
regional or statewide benefits. Any such regional
fees should equitably reflect the proportionate
share that development within the City contributes
to the total need for the improvement projects.

NOT COMPLETED
Policy CE-7.9: Funding for Bikeways through Street
Construction Funds street construction and improvement fund for financing bikeway design and construction.IN PROGRESS
Policy CE-7.10: Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan
Ensure that the City Bicycle and Pedestrian Master
Plan maintains consistency with the requirements
in the Streets and Highways Code in order to be
eligible for further funding for improvements from
the State, such as the Active Transportation
Program funds IN PROGRESS
through TIF
Include funding for the City’s Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan updates and bikeway
improvements consistent with the Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan in the City’s TIF recognizing
the multimodal travel needs of the City.IN PROGRESS
Attachment 1
Council Agenda 3-17-2026 12.C-27

← All documents from this meeting