CITY OF PITTSBURG
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 20, 2023
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
65 CIVIC AVENUE, PITTSBURG, CA
***NOTE: MEETINGS ARE BACK AT CITY HALL***
CLOSED SESSION
6:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING AUTHORITY
PITTSBURG ARTS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY
SOUTHWEST PITTSBURG GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT II
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
PRESIDING
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor/Chair
Juan Antonio Banales, Vice- Mayor/Chair
Jelani Killings, Council Member/Board Member
Dionne Adams, Council Member/Board Member
Angelica Lopez, Council Member/Board Member
FOR HOUSING AUTHORITY:
S.L. Floyd, Housing Authority Member
Annie Hill Herring, Housing Authority Member
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pittsburg City Council regular meetings are held the first and third Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. The Housing Authority meets in conjunction with the City Council on the third Monday of each month. The Pittsburg City Council meets regularly in the Council Chamber at 65 Civic Avenue, unless otherwise noted above. The City Council also sits as the Board of Directors of several other City agencies. The stipends for all agency members conform to state statutes governing compensation amounts.
All other Agencies meet on an as needed basis and will be listed above if applicable. Copies of the open session agenda packets, which are distributed to the City Council, are on file in the office of the City Clerk, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California, and are available for public inspection, beginning 72 hours in advance, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except from noon to 1:00 p.m. and City holidays). The agenda and reports are also located on the City’s website at www.pittsburgca.gov. Additionally, if any reports or documents, which are public records, are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours before the meeting, those reports and documents will also be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office and on the day of the meeting in the Council Chamber at the public counter area below the dais. 1 AUDIENCE REMARKS
The Audience Remarks period is for the public to comment on any items scheduled to be heard during the Closed Session portion of the meeting, if applicable.
6:30 P.M. - CONVENE IN CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS pursuant to Section 54956.8
Property: 1000 Civic Avenue; City negotiators: Garrett Evans, Jordan Davis Negotiating parties: Discovery Builders, Inc.; Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment
7:00 P.M. - CONVENE IN OPEN SESSION FOR REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATIONS
2. Presentation by County Clerk-Recorder on 2024 Election Cycle
PROCLAMATIONS
3. Homelessness Awareness Month
CITY MANAGER REPORTS/REMARKS
The City Manager may make brief announcements or informal comments at this time and brief the Council on items of interest. (No Action Required)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the audience who wish to address the City Council or Agency Boards on issues that are not scheduled for the agenda and on any items listed as part of the Consent Calendar should complete a Speaker's Card available at the dais. Please read the card carefully in order to fill out the card properly.
Submit the completed card to the City Clerk before the item is called, preferably before the meeting begins. Individuals will be given three minutes to address the Council unless additional time is allowed as provided for spokespersons. Prior to speaking, each member of the public shall state their name and business and City of residence in a clear and audible tone of voice. (No Action Required)
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Members may make a report on their committee assignments at this time. (see attached list of adhoc committees and other public agencies in which Council members particiapte). (No Action Required) 2 HOUSING AUTHORITY
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Minutes of August 21, 2023
COMBINED CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY CONSENT CALENDAR
5. Adoption of a City Council Resolution and Housing Authority Resolution Authorizing the Use of Housing Successor Agency Funds
The City is proposing to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Humewood Inc. (Seller) for the purchase of 2362 Dover Way, Pittsburg, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 087-352-010 (Property).
HOUSING AUTHORITY MEMBER REMARKS
ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PUBLIC HEARING
6. Adoption of a Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR)
This is a public hearing on a request to adopt a resolution approving: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision, and 3) Design Review of landscape and architectural plans. This public hearing also includes a request to introduce and waive first reading of an ordinance approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to singlefamily units for the Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17).
The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071.
3 CONSIDERATION
7. Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Approve Acceptance of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
The Pittsburg Police Department is seeking City Council authorization to accept and allocate $37,029 in JAG Grant funds towards the purchase of a Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
City Council/Agency Members may make any conflict of interest declarations pertaining to Consent Calendar items at this time.
COMBINED CITY COUNCIL, PITTSBURG ARTS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION,
PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND SOUTHWEST
PITTSBURG GHAD II CONSENT CALENDAR
8. Receive and File the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2023
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2023. The report includes the combined detailed information of the City and the Successor Agency’s (Agency) investments, which are compliant with the City’s and Agency’s Investment Policies.
9. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement between the City of Pittsburg and TRC Solutions, Inc.
The City has a Consultant Agreement (Agreement) with TRC Solutions, Inc. (TRC) for environmental assessments and remediation planning services related to brownfield sites through the Brownfield Multipurpose Grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). The City will be conducting remediation activities and requires additional project activities like bidding assistance, field oversight during remediation construction, and grant reporting.
10. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 3021 – City Park Tree Safety Maintenance as Complete
Project 3021-City Park Tree Safety Maintenance (the Project), consisted of emergency removal and maintenance work to reduce stress on certain trees in City Park. This resolution will accept the contract as complete.
11. Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Approve Contract with Dell Technologies, LLC for the refresh of the Public Safety Camera Servers at Police Department The Pittsburg Police Department is seeking City Council authorization to award a contract for the refresh of the Public Safety Camera Server infrastructure being used by the department.
4 12. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing Application for a Outdoor Equity Grants Funds
The Recreation Department is pursuing the State of California Outdoor Equity Grants Program for recreational programming for youth and seniors. The Conservancy requires City Council approval prior to application for this funding.
13. Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Accept the Plans and Specifications and Awarding Project 1801 Frontage Road Living Green Trail
Project 1801-Frontage Road Living Green Trail (“the Project”), will construct a Class I trail, and parkway improvements along Frontage Road from Dover Way to Chelsea Way. Adoption of this resolution will accept the plans and specifications for the Project and authorize the City Manager to award a construction contract to Grade Tech, Inc.
14. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving the Purchase and Sale Agreement By between the City of Pittsburg and Humewood Inc.
The City is proposing to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Humewood Inc. for the purchase of 2362 Dover Way, Pittsburg, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 087-352-010 (Property).
15. Adoption of Two Ordinances for the Objective Design Standards 2023 Project: 1) Adding Article XXI to Chapter 18.84 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code; and 2) Amending the Zoning Map for Certain Multi-family Housing and Mixed-use Development Projects to Further Housing Production Consistent with State Law On October 2, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on a City-initiated request for adoption of two Ordinances for the Objective Design Standards 2023 Project: 1) adding Article XXI to Chapter 18.84 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code; and 2) amending the Zoning Map for certain multi-family housing and mixed-use development projects to further housing production consistent with state law. The City Council introduced and waived further reading of two Ordinances approving the Objective Design Standards 2023 Project. This item has been continued from the November 6, 2023, City Council hearing. The Ordinance is now ready for City Council adoption.
16. Adoption of Three Ordinances Terminating Development Agreements Between the City of Pittsburg and 1) SEECON Built Homes, Inc. for the Greystone Place Project, 2) Discovery Homes, Inc. for the Belle Harbor (Waterstone) Subdivision Project, and 3) Forecast Land Development LLC for the Liberty Subdivision Project
In May 2023, staff conducted an annual review of compliance for Development Agreements and concluded that the Greystone Place, Belle Harbor, and Liberty Subdivision residential projects have been fully constructed, all conditions of approval have been satisfied and that the Development Agreements can be terminated. State law requires Development Agreements to be terminated by 5 using the same procedure to enter into the agreement.
The ordinances are now ready for City Council adoption.
COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Members may request items to be considered for future agendas. An item will only be brought forward with a majority vote and will appear on a future agenda with staff recommendations for further Council consideration.
COUNCIL MEMBER REMARKS
Council Members may make brief announcements or informal comments at this time. (No Action Required) ADJOURNMENT TO DECEMBER 4, 2023
6 NOTICE TO PUBLIC
GENERAL INFORMATION
Copies of the open session agenda packets, as distributed to the City Council, are on file in the office of the City Clerk, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California, and are available for public inspection, beginning 72 hours in advance, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except City holidays). Full agenda packets are also located on the City’s website at www.pittsburgca.gov. If any reports or documents, which are public records, are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours before the meeting, those reports or documents will be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office and on the day of the meeting in the Council Chamber at the public counter area below the dais.
SPEAKER’S CARD
Members of the audience who wish to address the City Council on issues that are not scheduled for the agenda and on any items listed as part of the agenda should complete a Speaker’s Card available at the dais. Please read the card carefully in order to fill out the card properly. Submit the completed card to the City Clerk before the item is called, preferably before the meeting begins. Individuals will be given up to three minutes to address the Council unless additional time is allowed as provided for spokespersons. Speakers are not permitted to yield their time to another speaker. Prior to speaking, each member of the public shall state their name and business and City of residence in a clear and audible tone of voice. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action may be taken by the City Council on items not already scheduled on the agenda; however, the City Council may refer your comments/concerns to staff or request that the item be placed on a future agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Persons who wish to speak on Public Hearings listed on the agenda will be heard when the Public Hearing is opened, except on Public Hearing items previously heard and closed to public comment. After the public has commented, the item is closed to public comment and brought to the Council/Agency level for discussion and action. Further comment from the audience will not be received unless requested by the Council/Agency.
There is a 90-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders which require a hearing by law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6). Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but not limited to Government Code Section 65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing. The City Council may be requested to reconsider a decision if the request is made prior to the next City Council meeting, regardless of whether it is a regular or special meeting.
NOTICE TO THE DISABLED AND VISUALLY OR HEARING IMPAIRED In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Pittsburg will provide special assistance for disabled residents. Upon request, an agenda for any meeting shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats. The Council Chamber is equipped with sound amplifier units for use by the hearing impaired. The units operate in conjunction with the Chamber’s sound system. You may request the sound amplifier from the City Clerk for personal use during Council meetings. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, or are requesting a specially formatted agenda, please contact the City Clerk at (925) 252-4850. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format. (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
DISRUPTIVE CONDUCT
The Council requests that you observe the order and decorum of our Council Chamber by turning off or setting to vibrate all cellular telephones and electronic devices, and that you refrain from making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks. Boisterous and disruptive behavior while the Council is in session, and the display of signs in a manner which violates the rights of others or prevents others from watching or fully participating in the Council meeting, is a violation of our Municipal Code and any person who engages in such conduct can be ordered to leave the Council Chamber by the Mayor.
LIVE MEDIA BROADCASTING ADVISEMENT
City Council meetings are webcast live on the City’s website at www.pittsburgca.gov on the Agendas and Live Meetings page. Past meetings and approved minutes are also archived on that webpage. Watch the live meeting via the City’s webcast (www.pittsburgca.gov - Agendas and Live Meetings), on Comcast Channel 24 Delta TV, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 Delta TV. Contact the City Clerk’s office at (925) 252-4850 for more information 7 City Council Outside Agency / Liaison / Sub-Committees Assignments - 2023 Updated July 17, 2023
OUTSIDE AGENCY BOARDS COUNCIL MEMBER(S) TYPE MEETS TIME STAFF ABAG Shanelle Scales-Preston / Jelani Killings Alt. Standing Annual G. Evans Delta Diablo* Juan Banales / Shanelle Scales-Preston Alt. Standing 2nd Wednesday 4:30 pm J. Samuelson East Co. Co. County Habitat Conservancy Juan Banales / Jelani Killings Alt. Standing 4th Monday 2:00 pm J. Davis Bi-Monthly
East County Water Management Juan Banales / Jelani Killings Alt. Standing Annual J. Samuelson MCE Clean Energy Board Shanelle Scales-Preston / Angelica Lopez Alt. Standing Quarterly 7:00 pm D. Buchanan TRANSPLAN / ECCRFFA Shanelle Scales-Preston / Juan Banales Alt. Standing 2nd Thursday 6:30 pm J. Samuelson Tri-Delta Transit (2 reps)** S. Scales-Preston & Dionne Adams / Jelani Killings Alt. Standing Last Wednesday 4:00 pm J. Samuelson
LIAISON TO COUNCIL MEMBER(S) TYPE MEETS TIME STAFF
East Bay League of Calif. Cities Shanelle Scales-Preston / Jelani Killings Alt. Standing 3rd Thursday G. Evans Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee Shanelle Scales-Preston & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc As needed M. Aliotti Mayor’s Conference Shanelle Scales-Preston / Juan Banales Alt. Standing 1st Thursday 6:30 pm G. Evans School Districts Committee (2x2) Jelani Killings & Angelica Lopez / Dionne Adams Alt. Standing 2nd Thursday 4:00 pm M. Aliotti Quarterly
Pittsburg Police Activities League (PAL) Shanelle Scales-Preston & Angelica Lopez / Dionne Adams Alt. Standing Monthly S. Albanese
SUBCOMMITTEES COUNCIL MEMBER(S) TYPE MEETS TIME STAFF
Community and Economic Development Jelani Killings & Angelica Lopez / Juan Banales Alt. Standing As needed J. Davis Finance Management Shanelle Scales-Preston & Juan Banales / Jelani Killings Alt. Standing As needed P. Rodrigues Government Performance Juan Banales & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc As needed J. Brizel Infrastructure and Transportation Juan Banales & Dionne Adams / Angelica Lopez Alt. Standing As needed J. Samuelson Life Enrichment Dionne Adams & Angelica Lopez / Shanelle Scales-Preston Alt. Standing As needed K. Simonton Public Safety Shanelle Scales-Preston & Jelani Killings / Dionne Adams Alt. Standing As needed S. Albanese Tobacco, Cannabis, Alcohol Policy Review Shanelle Scales-Preston & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc As needed G. Evans *Stipend of $170 per month
**Stipend of $100 per month
8 9
Housing Authority Minutes 1 of 2 August 21, 2023
CITY OF PITTSBURG
HOUSING AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES
DATE: August 21, 2023
LOCATION: Council Chamber, City Hall, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 CITY COUNCIL.AGENCY MEMBERS
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor/Chair
Juan Antonio Banales, Vice-Mayor/Chair
Jelani Killings, Council/Agency Member
Dionne Adams, Council/Agency Member
Angelica Lopez, Council/Agency Member
S.L. Floyd, Agency Member
Annie Hill Herring, Agency Member
APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Garrett Evans, City Manager/Executive Director
Donna Mooney, City Attorney/Legal Counsel
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk/Agency Secretary (elected) Nancy Parent, City Treasurer (elected)
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Scales-Preston called the meeting of the Housing Authority to order at 9:15 P.M. in the City Council Chamber at City Hall, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California.
ROLL CALL
All members were present.
CONSENT CALENDAR
On Motion by Member Floyd, seconded by Member Herring to adopt and carried unanimously.
8. Minutes of June 19, 2013
9. Disbursement List of April, May, June 2023
10. Adoption of a Housing Authority Resolution Approving the Section 8 Management Assessment Program Certification for Fiscal Year End June 30, 2023
11. Adoption of a Housing Authority Resolution Approving the Pittsburg Chamber of Commerce 2023-2024 Lease and Common Area Maintenance Offset.
12. Adoption of a Housing Authority Resolution Authorizing the Use of Housing Successor Agency Funds to Pay for a Portion of the Coordinated Outreach Referral and Engagement Program Agreement.
10 Housing Authority Minutes 2 of 2 August 21, 2023
HOUSING AUTHORITY MEMBER REMARKS
There were no Housing Authority Member remarks.
ADJOURNMENT
The Housing Authority was adjourned at 9:17 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Alice E. Evenson, Secretary
11 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Chair and Governing Board Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution and Housing Authority Resolution Authorizing the Use of Housing Successor Agency Funds
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City is proposing to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Humewood Inc. (Seller) for the purchase of 2362 Dover Way, Pittsburg, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 087-352-010 (Property).
FISCAL IMPACT
The purchase price of the Property could be as much as $580,000 (Purchase Price). The Purchase Price is conditional upon the completion and findings of a home, pest, and leadbased paint inspection reports. The anticipated costs related to the purchase such as closing costs, required lead-based paint testing, and rehabilitation work needed so that the Property may be suitable for leasing is approximately $35,000.
Staff is planning to spend no more than $615,000 of Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) grant funds to purchase and rehabilitate the Property. To use PLHA grant funds, the City will have to submit a draw-down request to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). It could take up to eight weeks from submission of the draw-down request to actual receipt of the funds. Therefore, staff is proposing to use Housing Success Agency (HSA) funds to complete the purchase and rehabilitation which will be reimbursed once PLHA funds are received.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council and Governing Board of the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (Housing Authority) adopt the Resolutions authorizing the use of HSA funds by approving a loan agreement.
12 BACKGROUND
In September 2017, the California Legislature approved Senate Bill 2, known as the Building Homes and Jobs Act (Act), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable housing. The Act established the PLHA program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
The PLHA provides a permanent source of funding to cities and counties to help meet the need for affordable housing and increase the supply of affordable housing units. Under the PLHA, funding is provided through formula grants to entitlement jurisdictions based on the formula prescribed under federal law for the Community Development Block Grant program over a 5-year funding period, as well as through a competitive grant program for nonentitlement jurisdictions.
PLHA grant funds are to help increase the supply of housing for households at or below 60 percent of area median income (AMI). On April 17,2023, City Council Resolution 23-14276 authorized the City Manager to purchase properties with PLHA grant funds and transfer the properties to the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (Housing Authority) for affordable housing purposes, and Housing Authority Resolution 23-366 authorized the Housing Authority to accept properties from the City. The Housing Authority will record regulatory agreements on the properties, ensuring that the properties will remain affordable for 55 years and lease them to Housing Choice Voucher recipients.
On August 21, 2023, City Council Resolution 23-14362 authorized the purchase of properties that fulfilled a set of criteria. Typically, the process in which the City purchases properties consists of consideration of the item in a City Council closed session meeting where price and terms would be discussed. Once authorization is given, staff would make an offer and conduct a site visit to inspect the condition of the property to determine the extent of the rehabilitation needed to make the property suitable for rental. Because of scheduling, this process could take as much as four weeks. Due to the real estate market, four weeks could result in lost opportunities because the seller will likely have accepted an offer already. City Council Resolution 23-14362 authorized the purchase of properties not yet identified so long as they meet the following criteria:
• The property is residential and has up to four bedrooms; • A structural pest control inspection report for the property must be available, reviewed by the Chief Building Inspector, and the Chief Building Inspector must determine the condition of the property is acceptable in light of the estimated purchase price;
• Staff and Chief Building Inspector must complete a site visit and evaluate the condition of the property and estimated rehabilitation cost; and • The purchase price, including closing costs and rehabilitation, will not exceed $650,000 in total.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
The potential purchase of the Property was discussed in the Life Enrichment Subcommittee on October 26, 2023.
13 STAFF ANALYSIS
The Property is 1,349 square feet and has four bedrooms and two bathrooms. Because the Property is less than one mile from an elementary school and middle school, and is approximately one and a half mile from the high school, the Property is well suited for a family.
The Housing Authority serves a population whose income is below 60 percent AMI, making the purchase of the Property to be leased to Housing Choice Voucher recipients the appropriate use of the PLHA grant funds.
HCD’s processing time of the City’s draw-down request could take up to eight weeks which could impede the Seller’s willingness to sell to the City. Using HSA funds will provide the necessary funding to complete the purchase and rehabilitation. The HSA funds will be reimbursed once the PLHA funds are received.
ATTACHMENTS: Housing Authority Resolution
City Council Resolution
Loan Agreement
Report Prepared By: Maria M. Aliotti, Assistant City Manager 14 Resolution No. 23- Page 1 of 2 November 20, 2023
BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Authorizing the Use of Housing Successor )
Agency Funds ) RESOLUTION NO. 23-
WHEREAS, in September 2017, the California Legislature approved Senate Bill 2, known as the Building Homes and Jobs Act (Act), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the Act established the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and
WHEREAS, the PLHA provides a permanent source of funding to cities and counties to help meet the need for affordable housing and increase the supply of affordable housing units; and
WHEREAS, PLHA grant funds are to help increase the supply of housing for households at or below 60 percent of area median income (AMI); and WHEREAS, on April 17,2023, City Council Resolution 23-14276 authorized the City Manager to purchase properties with PLHA grant funds and transfer the properties to the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (Housing Authority) for affordable housing purposes, and Housing Authority Resolution 23-366 authorized the Housing Authority to accept properties from the City.
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority will record regulatory agreements on the properties, ensuring that the properties will remain affordable for 55 years and lease them to Housing Choice Voucher recipients; and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2023, City Council Resolution 23-14362 authorized the purchase of properties that fulfilled a set of criteria:
The property is residential and has up to four bedrooms; A structural pest control inspection report for the property must be available, reviewed by the Chief Building Inspector, and the Chief Building Inspector must determine the condition of the property is acceptable in light of the estimated purchase price;
Staff and Chief Building Inspector must complete a site visit and evaluate the condition of the property and estimated rehabilitation cost; and The purchase price, including closing costs and rehabilitation, will not exceed $650,000 in total; and
WHEREAS, the City is proposing to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Humewood Inc. for the purchase of 2362 Dover Way, Pittsburg, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 087-352-010 (Property); and
15 Resolution No. 23- Page 2 of 2 November 20, 2023
WHEREAS, the Property is 1,349 square feet and has four bedrooms and two bathrooms. Because the Property is less than one mile from an elementary school and middle school, and is approximately one and a half mile from the high school, the Property is well suited for a family; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority serves a population whose income is below 60 percent AMI, making the purchase of the Property to be leased to Housing Choice Voucher recipients the appropriate use of the PLHA grant funds; and WHEREAS, to use PLHA grant funds, the City will have to submit a draw-down request to HCD). It could take up to eight weeks from submission of the draw-down request to actual receipt of the funds. Therefore, staff is proposing to use Housing Success Agency (HSA) funds to complete the purchase and rehabilitation which will be reimbursed once PLHA funds are received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Governing Board of the Housing Authority hereby authorizes the use of HSA funds of up to $615,000 for the purchase and rehabilitation of the Property.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 20th day of November 2023, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Chair
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, Agency Secretary
16 Resolution No. 23- Page 1 of 2 November 20, 2023
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Approving a Loan Agreement Using Housing )
Successor Agency Funds ) RESOLUTION NO. 23-
WHEREAS, in September 2017, the California Legislature approved Senate Bill 2, known as the Building Homes and Jobs Act (Act), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the Act established the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and
WHEREAS, the PLHA provides a permanent source of funding to cities and counties to help meet the need for affordable housing and increase the supply of affordable housing units; and
WHEREAS, PLHA grant funds are to help increase the supply of housing for households at or below 60 percent of area median income (AMI); and WHEREAS, on April 17,2023, City Council Resolution 23-14276 authorized the City Manager to purchase properties with PLHA grant funds and transfer the properties to the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (Housing Authority) for affordable housing purposes, and Housing Authority Resolution 23-366 authorized the Housing Authority to accept properties from the City.
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority will record regulatory agreements on the properties, ensuring that the properties will remain affordable for 55 years and lease them to Housing Choice Voucher recipients; and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2023, City Council Resolution 23-14362 authorized the purchase of properties that fulfilled a set of criteria:
The property is residential and has up to four bedrooms; A structural pest control inspection report for the property must be available, reviewed by the Chief Building Inspector, and the Chief Building Inspector must determine the condition of the property is acceptable in light of the estimated purchase price;
Staff and Chief Building Inspector must complete a site visit and evaluate the condition of the property and estimated rehabilitation cost; and The purchase price, including closing costs and rehabilitation, will not exceed $650,000 in total; and
17 Resolution No. 23- Page 2 of 2 November 20, 2023
WHEREAS, the City is proposing to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Humewood Inc. for the purchase of 2362 Dover Way, Pittsburg, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 087-352-010 (Property); and
WHEREAS, the Property is 1,349 square feet and has four bedrooms and two bathrooms. Because the Property is less than one mile from an elementary school and middle school, and is approximately one and a half mile from the high school, the Property is well suited for a family; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority serves a population whose income is below 60 percent AMI, making the purchase of the Property to be leased to Housing Choice Voucher recipients the appropriate use of the PLHA grant funds; and WHEREAS, to use PLHA grant funds, the City will have to submit a draw-down request to HCD). It could take up to eight weeks from submission of the draw-down request to actual receipt of the funds. Therefore, staff is proposing to use Housing Success Agency (HSA) funds to complete the purchase and rehabilitation which will be reimbursed once PLHA funds are received.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves a loan agreement authorizing the use of HSA funds of up to $615,000 for the purchase and rehabilitation of the Property.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Housing Authority at a regular meeting on the 20th day of November 2023 by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
18 1
A LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
AND THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
This Loan and Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) is entered into November 20, 2023 (Effective Date) by and between the City of Pittsburg, a municipal corporation (City), and the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg, a public body corporate and politic (Housing Authority); the City and Housing authority are collectively referred to as the “Parties”.
RECITALS
A. In September 2017, the California Legislature approved Senate Bill 2, known as the Building Homes and Jobs Act (Act), which established a $75 recording fee on real estate documents to increase the supply of affordable housing. The Act established the Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
B. The PLHA provides a permanent source of funding to cities and counties to help meet the need for affordable housing and increase the supply of affordable housing units for households at or below 60 percent of area median income.
C. On April 17,2023, City Council Resolution 23-14276 authorized the City Manager to purchase properties with PLHA grant funds and transfer the properties to the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (Housing Authority) for affordable housing purposes, and Housing Authority Resolution 23-366 authorized the Housing Authority to accept properties from the City. The Housing Authority will record regulatory agreements on the properties, ensuring that the properties will remain affordable for 55 years and lease them to Housing Choice Voucher recipients.
D. On August 21, 2023, City Council Resolution 23-14362 authorized the purchase of properties not yet identified so long as they meet the following criteria:
• The property is residential and has up to four bedrooms; • A structural pest control inspection report for the property must be available, reviewed by the Chief Building Inspector, and the Chief Building Inspector must determine the condition of the property is acceptable in light of the estimated purchase price;
• Staff and Chief Building Inspector must complete a site visit and evaluate the condition of the property and estimated rehabilitation cost; and
• The purchase price, including closing costs and rehabilitation, will not exceed $650,000 in total.
E. The City is proposing to enter into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) with Humewood Inc. for the purchase of 2362 Dover Way, Pittsburg, also known as 19 2
Assessor’s Parcel Number 087-352-010 (Property). The Property is 1,349 square feet and has four bedrooms and two bathrooms. Because the Property is less than one mile from an elementary school and middle school, and is approximately one and a half mile from the high school, the Property is well suited for a family; and F. The Housing Authority serves a population whose income is below 60 percent AMI, making the purchase of the Property to be leased to Housing Choice Voucher recipients the appropriate use of the PLHA grant funds. To use PLHA grant funds, the City will have to submit a draw-down request to HCD). It could take up to eight weeks from submission of the draw-down request to actual receipt of the funds.
G. The Parties propose to enter into this agreement pursuant to which the Housing Authority will loan to the City the monies necessary for the purchase and rehabilitation of the Property, which the City will be reimburse with current Local Agency Investment Fund interest once PLHA funds are received.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the Housing Authority and the City hereby agree as follows:
1. Term.
This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until the City has fully satisfied all repayment and reimbursement obligations it owes to the Housing Authority pursuant to this Agreement.
2. Reimbursement Payments; Subordination.
The Housing Authority shall loan the City an amount up to $615,000. City shall repay the loan with PLHA grant funds.
The Parties agree that all City obligations under this Agreement shall be subordinate to any and all existing indebtedness that the City has incurred prior to the Effective Date.
3. Further Assurances.
The Parties agree to execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other such other documents and instruments, and to undertake such other actions, as either shall reasonably request as may be necessary to carry out the intent of this Agreement.
4. No Third Party Beneficiaries.
There shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement except as specifically set forth herein.
20 3
5. Venue and Governing Law.
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action by any party to this agreement shall be brought in the appropriate court of competent jurisdiction within the County of Contra Costa, State of California, notwithstanding any other provision of law which may provide that such action may be brought in some other location.
6. Severability.
If any term, provision, covenant or condition contained in this Agreement or the application thereof to any person, party, transaction or circumstance is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such provision to other persons, parties, transactions or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
7. Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one instrument.
8. Amendments.
This Agreement may be modified or amended, in whole or in part, only by an instrument in writing, executed by the Parties.
9. Effect of Waiver.
No waiver by a party of any provision of this Agreement shall be considered a waiver of any other provision or any subsequent breach of the same or any other provision, including the time for performance of any such provision. The exercise by a party of any remedy provided in this Agreement or at law shall not prevent the exercise by that party of any other remedy provided in this Agreement or at law.
10. Captions; Entire Agreement.
The section headings used in this Agreement are for convenience only and are not intended to affect the interpretation or construction of the provisions herein contained. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Any amendment to this Agreement, including oral modifications supported by new consideration, must be reduced to writing and signed by both parties before it will be effective. The parties have had an equal opportunity to participate in the drafting of this Agreement. The usual construction of an agreement as to the drafting party shall not apply to this Agreement. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
21 4
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
HOUSING AUHTORITY OF THE CITY CITY OF PITTSBURG
OF PITTSBURG
____________________________ ______________________________ Garrett Evans, Executive Director Garrett Evans, City Manager ATTEST:
______________________________
Alice E. Evenson, Agency Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ ______________________________ Donna Mooney, Agency Counsel Donna Mooney, City Attorney 22 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP,
PD/RZ, SUBD, DR)
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is a public hearing on a request to adopt a resolution approving: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision, and 3) Design Review of landscape and architectural plans. This public hearing also includes a request to introduce and waive first reading of an ordinance approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to singlefamily units for the Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17). The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071.
FISCAL IMPACT
One-time revenues related to construction permits and other development fees and exactions are anticipated with this proposal. There is no impact to the General Fund if this project is approved.
23 RECOMMENDATION
City Council open the public hearing; take public comment; close the public hearing and take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving a General Plan Map amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review; and
2. Introduce, waive further reading, and pass to second reading, an ordinance (Attachment 2) approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District.
Please note: A condition of approval for the project has been included making approval of the Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review contingent upon City Council adoption of the ordinance approving the amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District.
BACKGROUND
On July 21, 2021, Discovery Builders, Inc., filed Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR), requesting: 1) an Amendment to the General Plan Map to change the land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multifamily units to single-family units, 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision (Siena at San Marco); to subdivide the project site into 206 individual lots for single-family residences, and 4) Design Review of landscape and architectural plans to construct residences at Siena at San Marco.
On July 27, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project.
Following public testimony and deliberations, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10226 (Attachment 3), recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance and resolution to approve the Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), subject to conditions.
Existing Conditions: Village C (62.52 acres) and Village O (25.90 acres) are vacant and undeveloped and bisected by West Leland Rd; Village C is on the north side of West Leland Road and Village O is on the south side of West Leland Road. Surrounding land uses are primarily residential, vacant rangeland and open space.
The project site is comprised of an approximately 48-acre portion of Village C (Unit 17) and an approximately 10-acre portion of Village O (Unit 16). The remaining 15-acre portion of Village C, while currently vacant, is slated for future development of San Marco Villas (Phase III – 270 multifamily units).
24 The project site (Units 16 and 17) consists of gently rolling hills and some leveled areas.
Elevations within the Unit 17 portion of the project site range from 300 to 460 feet above mean sea level and there is a notable large hill in the central part of Unit 17 with a transmission tower and corridor through the middle of the site. Elevations within the Unit 16 portion of the project site range from 350 to 440 feet above mean sea level with a low area in the western portion of Unit 16, with the surrounding hill gently sloping toward the low area. The transmission line corridor through the project site houses two parallel Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) electrical transmission lines (230 and 115 kilovolt [kV]).
The project site is approximately one and one-half-mile from the Pittsburg/Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station and is within a quarter mile of Tri Delta Transit Route 200 bus stops located near the intersection of West Leland Road and San Marco Boulevard.
See Photos of the Project Site in Attachment 4.
Surrounding Land Uses
Village C (~48 acres)
North: Agricultural-Natural Resources Trust parcel (5 acres) (constructed detention basin), State Highway 4
West: Avila Road RV & Boat Storage, Spilker, LLC property (vacant) South: West Leland Road and Units 11 and 12 (Positano)
East: Future San Marco Villas III (~15 acres of Village C) – 270 multifamily units, Existing San Marco Villas I and II (Village B – 462 multifamily units) Village O (~10 acres)
North: West Leland Road
West: Existing residential subdivision known as Positano (Village L) South: Residential Subdivision known as Positano (Village L) East: Eastern portion (~16 acres) of Village O (vacant) See Map of Surrounding Land Uses in Attachment 5.
Proposed Project: The proposed project, if approved, would allow for the development of 181 single-family units on an approximately 48-acre portion of Village C (Unit 17) and 25 single-family units within all approximately 10 acres of Village O (Unit 16).
Village C. The San Marco Development Plan originally planned for 339 multifamily units (townhouse apartments) to be built in Village C. To date, 270 of the 339 multifamily units have been approved (San Marco Villas III), but not yet constructed which leaves 69 units remaining in Village C. The applicant proposes to transfer 112 units into Village C (98 units from Village M, nine units from Village B, and five units from Village O), which would increase the unit count in Village C to 181 total. All 181 units were planned as multifamily units under the original San Marco Development Plan. The proposed project, if approved, would map and construct all 181 units as single-family units instead of multifamily units.
Village O. The San Marco Development Plan originally planned for 291 multifamily units (townhouse apartments) to be built in Village O. To date, none of those units have been approved or constructed. The applicant proposes to convert 25 units within Village O from multifamily units to single family units.
25 Taken together, Units 16 and 17 (the Siena Subdivision – 206 total single family units) would be constructed on an approximately 58-acre portion of the larger San Marco site; 25 units on a 10-acre portion of Village O and 181 units on a 48-acre portion of Village C.
Project Entitlements.
Four approvals are requested for this project: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362), 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and 4) Design Review. Each approval is discussed in detail below.
1. General Plan Map Amendment
The proposed General Plan Map Amendment, if approved, would change the current land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space, which allows construction to a maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), to Low Density Residential and Open Space which allows for the construction of a maximum of 7 du/ac.
See Exhibit A of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the proposed General Plan Map Amendment.
2. San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment):
The proposed amendment to the Development Plan and PD-1362 District (Ordinance No. 12-1362), if approved, would:
a. Reassign 98 units from multifamily Village M, nine (9) units from multifamily Village B, and five (5) units from multifamily Village O to single family Village C; and b. Convert 25 units from multifamily Village O to single family units in Village O.
See Exhibit A of Attachment 2 (Ordinance) for the proposed Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District.
3. Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision:
The proposed Major Subdivision, if approved, would subdivide the approximately 58-acre project site into 206, single-family residential lots. The proposed lot sizes range from 3,402 sq. ft. (minimum) to 16,375 sq. ft. (maximum) in Unit 16 and 3,375 sq. ft. (minimum) to 26,560 sq. ft. (maximum) in Unit 17. See discussion below for Vesting Tentative Map project development and design regarding access, open space, off-street parking, bicycle facilities, and infrastructure and utilities.
Access:
Vehicular access to Unit 17 would be from Siena Village Drive. Messina Circle, Livorno Drive, and Brindisi Drive would serve lots in the northern portion and Casina Circle, Giovanni Drive, Catania Court, Lucca Lane, and Pesara Lane would serve lots in the southern portion of Unit 17. Vehicular access Unit 16 would be from Street A. Street B would serve lots in the eastern portion of Unit 16.
26 All streets throughout the proposed subdivision would be public streets*. Six-foot-wide sidewalks on both sides of the street are required.
Proposed roadway widths are listed below:
Siena Village Drive: 40-ft. – 52-ft.
Giovanni Drive: 40-ft.
Casina and Messina Circles: 36-ft.
Brindisi and Livorno Drives: 36-ft.
Lucca and Pesaro Lanes**: 30-ft.
Catania Court: 30-ft.
Streets A and B: 36-ft.
*Lucca and Pesaro Lanes on the west side of Unit 17 would be private access easements, not public streets, and therefore do not include sidewalks. **Note: Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 22500.1 and California Fire Code section 503.3, roadways less than 36-ft. wide shall have NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signs posted, allowing for parking on one side only or curbs painted red with the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE clearly marked. This requirement will apply to Catania Court and both Lucca and Pesaro Lanes.
Open Space:
Unit 17
There are 11 open space lots of varying sizes throughout Unit 17; Parcels A (49,207 sq. ft.), B (406,631 sq. ft.) and J (222,321 sq. ft.) would be designated open space devoted to Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD). Parcel C would be a 2,888-sq. ft. pocket park, Parcel D (1,132 sq. ft.) would be devoted to Emergency Vehicle Access, Parcels E (668 sq. ft.), F (1,093 sq. ft.), G (2,468 sq. ft.) and H (4,366 sq. ft.) would be common area landscaping, Parcel I (1,924 sq. ft.) would be drainage maintenance access and Parcel K would be a 20,314-sq. ft. dog park. Parcels L and M are located across West Leland Road from Unit 17 and would be designated open space. Parcel N indicates a future West Leland Road.
Unit 16
There are four open space lots of varying sizes throughout Unit 16: Parcel A would be a pump station (5,079 sq. ft.), Parcels B (15,363 sq. ft.), C (6,443 sq. ft.) and D would be designated open space devoted to Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD).
Frontage improvements to West Leland Road and Santa Teresa Drive (curb, gutter and sidewalk) have already been provided by the applicant.
Off-Street Parking:
Each residence within the proposed subdivision would include a two-car garage, which satisfies the requirement for off-street parking in Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter
18.78. 27
Bicycle Facilities:
A Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive is required as part of this project. The applicant has also proposed two, wall-mounted bicycle racks in the garage of all 206 residences.
Infrastructure/Utilities:
Water
Based on a water supply analysis conducted by West Yost, dated July 27, 2022, the proposed subdivision is not anticipated to change the storage or pumping capacity findings or recommendations included in the City’s 2015 Water System Master Plan or the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Further, the additional water demand due to the Project’s land use changes represents only a 0.1 percent increase in the City’s projected future maximum day and peak hour demands. Thus, the additional water demand is not anticipated to trigger the need for additional pipeline improvements.
Sewer
The City and the Delta Diablo Sanitation District would provide sewer services. The sewer master plan for the overall San Marco Development was previously reviewed and approved by the City, which has always showed the proposed sewers for Unit 17 be conveyed thru San Marco Villas and eventually discharged into San Marco Boulevard. The proposed sewer design and layout is consistent with the previously City approved master plan.
Stormwater
The Contra Costa County Flood Control District has previously reviewed and approved the San Marco Drainage Study which included the proposed project site.
Provisions regulating stormwater management and discharge control in Chapter 13.28 PMC, require effective February 15, 2005, implementation of appropriate source control and site design measures and stormwater treatment measures for projects that create or replace one acre or more of impervious surface, and that effective August 15, 2006, reduce the threshold to projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface.
These provisions do not apply to the proposed project because the Southwest Development Agreement for the San Marco Development occurred on April 3, 1990 (Ordinance No. 90- 990), prior to implementation of stormwater management and C3 requirements adopted in February 2005.
Additionally, the applicant is not proposing more impervious surface than what was already approved under the current adopted San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362.
Stormwater from the project will not be treated on-site. Rather, it will flow through street drains and existing infrastructure along W Leland Road to the existing C3 basin near the corner of San Marco Boulevard and W Leland Road approximately between one-quarter and one-half mile from Unit 16 and 17 residences.
28 A condition of approval will require the applicant to evaluate the existing, receiving storm and sewer facilities for adequate capacity and provide the results to the City to identify any service or supply problems. If any service or supply problems arise, the applicant agrees to cover the cost for installation of additional facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the proposed project.
See Exhibit B of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the proposed Major Subdivision 9550 and Vesting Tentative Map.
4. Design Review:
Design Review is required for Major Subdivisions in single-family land use districts and PD districts. Pursuant to PMC section 18.36.200, Design Review can be required for structures proposed in land use districts other than single-family residential. See discussion below for details regarding architectural plans, green building features, refuse, landscaping, fencing, noise and monument signage.
Architectural Plans:
The Master Plotting Plan for Units 16 and 17 includes six, two-story, and one, three-story single-family residence models. Unit 17 plans indicate 181 total residences: 33 Plan 1, 26 Plan 2, 30 Plan 3, 28 Plan 4, 34 Plan 5, 26 Plan 6 and four (4) Plan 7. Unit 16 plans indicate 25 total residences: seven (7) Plan 1, zero (0) Plan 2, five (5) Plan 3, zero (0) Plan 4, five (5) Plan 5, zero (0) Plan 6 and eight (8) Plan 7.
With the exception of Plan 7, all models have three exterior design options (Elevations A, B and C) and six total color schemes. Plan 7 models only have two exterior design options (Elevations A and B).
Elevation ‘A’ house model designs are characterized by a mixture of hipped and gable-end roofs with concrete tile roofing material, stucco body and trim, foam brackets, simulated stone veneer and roll-up garage doors with optional window lites.
Elevation ‘B’ designs include all Elevation ‘A’ features but provide options for mock shutters on windows. Elevation ‘C’ designs include all Elevation ‘A’ and ‘B’ features but have gable roofs, board and batten siding, wood trim, and mock vents. As a condition of approval, all street facing elevations throughout the subdivision would be required to provide Elevation ‘C’ design elements such as window grids, shutters and board and batten siding.
See Exhibits D1 and D2 of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for selected enhanced elevations.
The proposed single-family residence models (Plans 1 – 7) would range from 2,382 to 3,574 sq. ft. in total living area. All 206 proposed lots would include a concrete pathway leading up to a front porch/patio area ranging in size from 39 to 114 sq. ft.
Plan 1. The floor plan for the 40, Plan 1 single-family residences shows a 380 sq. ft., two-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, a family room, a dining room, a kitchen with appliances, pantry, full bathroom and bedroom on the first floor. On the second floor, the Plan 1 floor plan shows four bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet), laundry facilities and a loft. 29 Plan 2. The floor plan for the 26, Plan 2 single-family residences shows a 380 sq. ft., two-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, a family room, a dining room, a kitchen with appliances, full bathroom, and a bedroom with a walk-in closet on the first floor. On the second floor, the Plan 2 floor plan shows three bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet), laundry facilities and a loft or optional fifth bedroom. Plan 2 floor plans also include a 245 sq. ft. covered patio.
Plan 3. The floor plan for the 35, Plan 3 single-family residences shows a 380 sq. ft., two-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, laundry facilities, a family room, a dining room, a kitchen with appliances, a half bathroom or ‘powder’ room and a bedroom with a full bathroom (in-suite) on the first floor. On the second floor, the Plan 3 floor plan shows four bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet) and a loft.
Plan 4. The floor plan for the 28, Plan 4 single-family residences shows a 380 sq. ft., two-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, a family room, a dining room, a kitchen with a ‘nook’ and appliances, full bathroom, and a bedroom with a walk-in closet on the first floor. On the second floor, the Plan 4 floor plan shows four bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet), laundry facilities and a loft area. Plan 4 floor plans also include a 243 sq. ft. covered patio.
Plan 5. The floor plan for the 39, Plan 5 single-family residences shows a 380 sq. ft., two-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, a family room, a dining room, a kitchen with a ‘nook’ and appliances, a living room, a full bathroom and a bedroom on the first floor. On the second floor, the Plan 5 floor plan shows four bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet), laundry facilities and a loft.
Plan 6. The floor plan for the 26, Plan 6 single-family residences shows a 380 sq. ft., two-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, a family room, a dining/living room, a ‘nook,’ a pantry, a kitchen with appliances, a half bathroom or ‘powder room,’ and a ‘junior’ master bedroom (including a ‘junior’ master bath and walk-in closet) on the first floor. On the second floor, the Plan 6 floor plan shows four bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet), laundry facilities and a loft.
Plan 7. The floor plan for the 12, Plan 7 single-family residences shows a 719-sq. ft. three-car garage with two wall-mounted bicycle racks, and a storage area and crawl space on the entry level. On the main level, the Plan 7 floor plan shows a family room, a dining room, a living room, a kitchen with a ‘nook,’ a pantry and appliances, a half bathroom or ‘powder room,’ and a ‘junior’ master bedroom (including a ‘junior’ master bath and walk-in closet). On the upper level, the Plan 7 floor plan shows three bedrooms, two full bathrooms (including a master bath and walk-in closet) and laundry facilities.
See Exhibit C of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the proposed Architectural Plans and Elevations.
Green Building Features:
Each proposed single-family residence would be equipped with an air conditioning unit and solar panels compliant with 2022 California Energy Code. Solar panels would be installed at the time of final occupancy through a separate permit. Additionally, the proposed project would include cool roofs and pre-wire for electric vehicle charging. 30 Refuse:
Each proposed single-family residence would be equipped with an approximately 8 sq. ft. concrete trash pad and the ability to accommodate three bins (refuse, recyclables, organics) at the curb in the front of each residence. All bins would be sized to ensure compliance with requirements of Senate Bill 1383 (2016). A Refuse Management Plan to promote safe, efficient and timely pickup of refuse by Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery (MDRR) is required prior to building permit issuance. A condition of approval will require a disclosure be provided to residents on Catania Court, Lucca and Pesaro Lanes (Unit 17) and on Street B (Unit 16) noting that, due to the narrow width of roadway, parking along the curb on designated pickup days will prevent the ability of MDRR to provide service to homes. An additional disclosure is required to be provided to residents of Lots 17 and 25 in Unit 16, noting that due to the length of the driveway, bins must be brought out to the main road (Street A) for service.
Landscaping:
Pursuant to Chapter 12.32 PMC, the Street Tree and Wall Plan indicates front yard landscaping would include at least one, 15-gallon container tree on each proposed residential lot. Street trees would consist of:
38 Red Maple
50 Chinese Pistache
90 London Plane Tree
100 Frontier Elm
Front-yard landscaping will be provided for each lot. Pre-emergent herbicide shall be provided for all planting areas. Planting areas shall receive a three-inch layer of light brown or black bark mulch dressing.
See Exhibit C of Attachment 1 (pages 49 – 51) for the proposed Street Tree Plan. Note: a condition of approval will require the 90 London Plane Tree be replaced with Saratoga Laurel or Sweet Bay and the 100 Frontier Elm be replaced with Australian Willow.
Fencing:
Each proposed lot would be fully fenced with a six-foot, board-on-board, wood fence with wood posts and include a latched yard gate. A six-foot, open view, wire fence would be installed adjacent to open spaces.
Noise:
Consistent with the City of Pittsburg General Plan Policy 12-P-6, sound walls and window upgrades are required for certain lots to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 decibels Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL).
Three, six-ft. tall sound walls are required along the southern edge of the project site nearest West Leland Road. One, eight-ft. tall and one, 10-ft. tall sound wall is required along the northern edge of the project site nearest State Route 4. The final, eight-ft. tall sound wall will be located along the eastern edge of the project site to buffer noise from the future San Marco Villas Phase III development. The sound walls will be Sierra Precast ‘Classic Style’ as shown in the Street Tree and Wall Plan.
31 Additionally, upper-floor windows for 58 Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 would receive window assembly upgrades with a higher than average Sound Transmission Class rating.
See Exhibit D3 of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the Windows and Sound Walls Exhibit.
Monument Signs:
Project entry monument signage would be installed at street intersections, i.e., two at the west entrance to Unit 17, two at the east entrance to Unit 17, one at the west entrance to Unit 16 and one at the east entrance to Unit 16.
See Exhibit C of Attachment 1 (page 51) for the proposed Wall Plan.
GENERAL PLAN/CODE COMPLIANCE:
Pittsburg General Plan 2020
The project site is located within the larger San Marco Development area which is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement (DA) originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993.
The DA was subsequently amended on October 1, 2001, in Ordinance No. 01-1187, on July 19, 2010, in Ordinance No. 10-1326, on April 15, 2013, in Ordinance No. 13-1369 and on December 21, 2020, in Ordinance No. 20-1481.
The DA locked in the land use regulations at the time it was originally adopted. At the time the DA and PD plan were adopted, they were determined to be consistent with the applicable General Plan (1988).
The project site is located within the San Marco Development area in the Southwest Hills subarea of the General Plan and is currently designated a mixture of High-Density Residential and Open Space. The High-Density Residential designation is intended to provide sites for residential densities ranging from 14 to 25 units per acre. The proposed Low Density Residential designation is intended to provide sites for residential densities ranging from 1 to 7 units per acre.
The proposed project is a single-family development with a density of 3.57 units per acre which is inconsistent with the existing General Plan land use designation for the project site.
To address this inconsistency, the applicant is requesting the parcel be redesignated to Low Density Residential. If the proposed General Plan Amendment is approved, the maximum density for the project site would be reduced from 25 units per acre to 7 units per acre, which would allow for a maximum of 404 units on the 57.73-acre project site. The applicant is proposing a total of 206 units on the project site, which is less than the maximum that would be allowed.
32 Zoning/Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District (Zoning Map Amendment) The current zoning for the site is PD-1362 (Planned Development District, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District, and the site is regulated by the conditions of approval set forth in the ordinance establishing the PD District. As previously discussed, the proposed project falls within the area designated as Villages C and O in the San Marco Development Plan area.
The requested PD District amendment would amend the current San Marco Development Plan to: 1) modify the land use table to transfer 98 units from multifamily Village M, nine (9) units from multifamily Village B, and five (5) units from multifamily Village O to single family Village C, and 2) convert 25 units from multifamily Village O to single family units in Village O.
The proposed transfer would not increase the total number of residential units (2,938) approved for construction within the San Marco Development area, pursuant to the provisions of the existing DA.
Pursuant to PMC section 18.62.070, amendments to adopted PD Districts are processed in the same manner as zoning map amendments.
Development Review Design Guidelines
The Development Review Design Guidelines (DRDG) were adopted by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2010, and are therefore not applicable to this project given the terms of the San Marco Development Agreement. Nevertheless, the guidelines provide a substantive framework specific to single family residential development and neighborhood/subdivision design for the subjective evaluation necessary as part of a design review application. As shown in Attachment 4, the proposed project is consistent with the applicable DRDG sections.
Inclusionary Housing Requirements
Development of the project site (Villages C and O) was envisioned in and is consistent with the current San Marco Development Plan. The San Marco Development Plan was determined to be consistent with the applicable General Plan (1988) at the time it was approved. The proposed project is exempt from Inclusionary Housing requirements in Chapter 18.86 PMC adopted in 2004 because the project is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement. The terms of the San Marco Development Agreement expressly prohibit the application of new City rules, regulations and policies that come into effect after July 1, 1993. As such, the current proposal is exempt and not subject to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (ECCC HCP/NCCP)
The City joined the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association as a member agency with the adoption of City Council Resolution No. 00-9196 on June 19, 2000. On April 16, 2007, the City established procedures to implement the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (ECCC HCP/NCCP) in PMC Chapter 15.108 (Ordinance No. 07-1293). 33 PMC section 15.108.030 (Applicability) describes development projects which are exempt from the City’s HCP provisions. PMC section 15.108.030(A)(4) specifically exempts “Development projects with vested rights as established by California law including Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869 (development agreements) and Sections 66498.1 through 66498.9 (vesting tentative maps) where such rights vested prior to adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter.”
The San Marco Development falls within this exemption given execution of the Southwest Development Agreement for the San Marco Development occurred on April 3, 1990 (Ordinance No. 90-990), prior to implementation of HCP requirements and procedures adopted in 2007.
Required Finding – General Plan Map Amendment: In order to adopt a general plan amendment, the City Council must determine, in accordance with Government Code section 65358, that the amendment would be in the public interest.
Required Findings – Zoning Map Amendment: In order to approve zoning changes, the City Council must determine, in accordance with PMC section 18.48.030, that:
A. the change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan; B. in the case of a base district, overlay district or general land use regulation, the change proposed is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is proposed; C. a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and D. its adoption would be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice.
Required Findings – Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision: In order to approve a Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision, the City Council must determine, in accordance with PMC section 17.20.060(c), that:
A. the proposed map is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provision of PMC;
B. the site is physically suitable for the type of development; C. the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; D. the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements would not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
E. the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements would not cause serious public health problems; and
34 F. the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements would not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
Required Findings – Design Review: In order to grant Design Review approval for a project, the City Council must determine, in accordance with PMC section 18.36.220.B, that:
A. the structure conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality;
B. the structure would be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors that may tend to make the environment less desirable; C. the exterior design and appearance of the structure is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value;
D. the structure is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area; and
E. the application conforms with the criteria set forth in any applicable City adopted Design Guidelines.
A full analysis of how the proposed project meets the required General Plan Map amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review findings is provided in Section 2 (Findings) of the Resolution (Attachment 1). A full analysis of how the proposed project meets the required findings for an Amendment to an adopted PD Plan is provided in Section 2 (Findings) of the Ordinance (Attachment 2).
Environmental Review: On January 19, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93- 7888 certifying a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the entire, 639- acre, 2,938-unit project currently known as the San Marco Development (State Clearinghouse No. 1991073029).
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) provides that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declaration (ND) if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (listed below) calling for preparation of a Subsequent EIR or ND have occurred.
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 35 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, or the ND was adopted shows any of the following:
A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or ND.
B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or ND.
C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or ND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162, subd. (a); see also Pub. Resources Code, Section 21166).
City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the SEIR for the San Marco Subdivision remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional documentation may be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.).
There are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project or the circumstances in which the proposed project would be undertaken that would require major revisions of the prior certified SEIR. The proposed project does not require preparation of a new subsequent or supplemental EIR due to: 1) the involvement of new significant environmental effects, (2) a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, or (3) new information of substantial importance. No mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, nor has the Siena at San Marco proponent declined to adopt any additional mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. Rather, all the impacts associated with the Modified Project are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the prior certified SEIR. Applicable mitigation measures from the prior certified SEIR are identified and discussed in the Addendum and are also recommended for adoption as Conditions of Approval. Based on the discussion in this analysis and in the Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an Addendum provides the required documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
See Attachment 6 for a link to the CEQA Addendum.
Public Notice: On or before Friday, November 10, 2023, in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A, B and D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the November 20, 2023, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times; was posted at City Hall and at or near the project site; was delivered for posting at the Pittsburg Library; was posted on the “Public Notices” section of the City’s website and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, to the property 36 owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice. In addition, a copy of the notice was posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”) and was sent directly to all subscribed residents in the “Avila,” “San Marco” and “San Marco Villas” neighborhoods.
See Attachment 7 for the Public Hearing Notice.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff believes that the City Council can make the required findings to approve of the requested General Plan Map Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review. The staff-recommended findings are provided in Section 2 (Findings) of Attachment 1 (Resolution) and Attachment 2 (Ordinance) and summarized below.
There is a community need for the proposed amendments and requested approvals. The proposed amendments and requested approvals would conform with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. Currently, the entire San Marco Development area is designated for exclusively residential use in the approved PD Plan. The proposed amendments and requested approvals would not increase the total number of units already envisioned for the San Marco Development rather, would increase the number of small-lot, single-family units in the project, thereby increasing opportunities for homeownership for entry-level buyers in the community. As proposed, the architecture and site layout are complementary and consistent with the existing San Marco development project area. The proposed amendments and requested approvals would also place an increased number of residences in the San Marco development area closer to the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station.
The proposed project is consistent with many of the goals and policies contained within the 2020 General Plan. For instance, the proposed project will: provide low-density, singlefamily residential in the Southwest Hills subarea (Goal 2-G-4), provide a dog park as a community amenity (Policy 2-P-6), utilize a PD zoning to achieve a high-quality design outcome (Policy 2-P-5), pay its share of the costs for the construction of facilities needed to serve the development (Policy 3-P-1, 3-P-13, and 7-P-2), include a Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive and bicycle racks in each garage for secure bicycle parking (Policy 7-P-45), and include window assembly upgrades for upper-floor windows of Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dB CNEL (Policy 12-P-4).
The proposed project is subject to the City’s Development Review Design Guidelines (DRDG), adopted by the Planning Commission through Resolution No. 9864. The proposed project is consistent with the applicable DRDG sections that apply to this development, i.e., Sections I (Residential - Single Family/Duplex), II (Neighborhood/Subdivision Design) and Section VI (Green Building Design Guidelines).
37 Additionally, there is no new information identifying new significant effects, nor is there an increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to development of the project site. The conclusions from the prior certified SEIR remain unchanged when considering implementation of the proposed project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
a. Exhibit A – General Plan Map Amendment
b. Exhibit B – Vesting Tentative Map for Major Subdivision c. Exhibit C – Project Plans
d. Exhibit D – Conditions of Approval
2. Ordinance
a. Exhibit A – Amendment to San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 Plan
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 10226
4. Photos of Project Site
5. Map of Surrounding Uses
6. CEQA Addendum
7. Public Hearing Notice
Prepared by: Alison Hodgkin, Associate Planner
38 Resolution No.23- Page 1 of 9 November 20, 2023
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Approving a General Plan Map Amendment, )
Vesting Tentative Map for a Major )
Subdivision, and Design Review for “Siena ) RESOLUTION NO. 23- at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units )
16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, )
DR).” )
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2021, Discovery Builders, Inc., filed Planning Application No.
AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR), requesting: 1) an Amendment to the General Plan Map to change the land use designation of the project site from High Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multifamily units to single-family units, 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision (Siena at San Marco); to subdivide the project site into 206 individual lots for single-family residences, and 4) Design Review of landscape and architectural plans to construct residences at Siena at San Marco. The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located within the larger San Marco Development area which is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement (DA) originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, as subsequently amended. The project site is regulated by the conditions of approval set forth in the PD-1362 (Planned Development District, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and
WHEREAS, a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified in accordance with CEQA to examine the potential environmental effects of the original project (Final EIR for the San Marco Subdivision). The Pittsburg City Council certified the Final SEIR in Resolution No. 93-7888 on January 19, 1993, making the required findings under CEQA (State Clearinghouse No. 91073029). An Addendum to the certified Final SEIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 to address the proposed project (Siena at San Marco Units 16 and 17). The Addendum must be considered by the City Council with Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR); and WHEREAS, under Government Code section 65358, the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, may amend the City’s General Plan, in whole or in part, if it finds that the amendment would be in the public interest. No more than four general plan amendments to each required element may be adopted within one calendar year. In this calendar year so far, the City Council has adopted two amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC section 17.20.060(c), the City Council, upon 39 Resolution No.23- Page 2 of 9 November 20, 2023
recommendation of the Planning Commission, may approve a tentative map if it finds that: a) the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provision of the PMC; b) the site is physically suitable for the type of development; c) the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; d) the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; e) the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems; and f) the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC section 18.36.230, the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, may grant design review approval if it finds that: a) the structure conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality; b the structure will be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors that may tend to make the environment less desirable; c) the exterior design and appearance of the structure is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value; d) the structure is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area; and e) the application conforms with the criteria set forth in any applicable City adopted design guidelines; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10226, recommending approval of requested General Plan Map amendment, amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District, Vesting Tentative Map and Design Review; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to Friday, November 10, 2023, in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A - D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the November 20, 2023, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times; was posted at City Hall; was delivered for posting at the Pittsburg Library; and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, to the property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice; and
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2023, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing to: 1) introduce and waive further reading of an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and 2) adopt this resolution approving the General Plan Map amendment, Vesting Tentative Map, and Design Review, at which time oral and/or written testimony was considered.
40 Resolution No.23- Page 3 of 9 November 20, 2023
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pittsburg DOES RESOLVE as follows:
Section 1. Authority
A. Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution confers on cities the authority to regulate land use within their jurisdictions under the police power and to make and enforce ordinances to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Aesthetic reasons alone justify exercise of the police power (Metromedia, Inc. vs. City of San Diego [1980] 264 C3d 848, 164 CR 510).
B. The General Plan is the single most important planning document and represents the most comprehensive statement of the city’s interests and welfare (Government Code section 65300; Citizens of Goleta Valley vs. Board of Supervisors [1990] 52 CA3d 553, 276 CR 410). In general, all land use decisions must be consistent with the general plan. Consistency exists between a city’s land use action and the general plan when a city has officially adopted such a plan, and the various land uses approved are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the plan (Lesher Communications, Inc. vs. City of Walnut Creek [1990] 52 C3d 531, 277 CR1).
C. The Subdivision Map Act (Government Code section 66410, et seq.) vests in cities the power to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions within their boundaries (Government Code section 66411). “Improvement” is broadly defined to include any specific improvement or type of improvement, the installation of which is necessary to ensure consistency with the general plan (Government Code section 66419[b]).
D. A city may not approve a tentative map unless it finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions of its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan (Government Code section 66473.5).
Section 2. Findings
A. Based on the City Council staff report entitled, “Amending the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR),” dated November 20, 2023, and based on all the information contained in the Planning Division files on the project, incorporated herein by reference and available for review in the Planning Division located at 65 Civic Avenue in Pittsburg, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the public hearing, the City Council finds that:
1. All recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
41 Resolution No.23- Page 4 of 9 November 20, 2023
2. City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the San Marco
Development area remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional
documentation may be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.). Based on the analysis in the Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an Addendum provides the required
documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
General Plan Map Amendment:
3. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District is subject to the San Marco DA originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, which was found to be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the 1988 General Plan. Though the proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District is not subject to the 2020 General Plan, it is consistent with many of the goals and policies contained within the current document, and is therefore in the public interest, in that:
a. The proposed project will provide low-density, single-family residential in the Southwest Hills subarea (Goal 2-G-4). b. The proposed project will provide a dog park as a community amenity (Policy 2-P-6).
c. The proposed project will utilize a Planned Development (PD) zoning to achieve a high-quality design outcome (Policy 2-P5). d. The proposed project will pay its share of the costs for the construction of facilities needed to serve the development (Policy 3-P-1, 3-P-13, and 7-P-2). The proposed project will comply with conditions of approval requiring payment of the Facilities Reserve Charge, Local Traffic Mitigation Fee (LTMF), and Regional Transportation Development Impact
Mitigation Fee (RT-DIM) in accordance with the Pittsburg Municipal Code. The proposed project will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare in that it requires the Developer to pay fees to finance unmet local and regional traffic improvement needs and annex the site into the City’s Community Facilities District (CFD) 2007-1 for park
42 Resolution No.23- Page 5 of 9 November 20, 2023
maintenance and the City’s CFD 2017-1 for fire facilities and fire safety and emergency services.
e. The proposed project will be built in an area where public facilities and infrastructure are already available (Policy 3-P1). A condition of approval will require the applicant to evaluate the existing, receiving storm and sewer facilities for adequate capacity and provide the results to the city to identify any service or supply problems. If any service or supply problems arise, the applicant agrees to cover the cost for installation of additional facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the proposed project.
f. The existing transportation system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed project (Policy 3-P-2). Residents of the proposed project will have multiple transportation options available to them as the site is located near BART, Tri-Delta Transit, and bicycle lanes.
g. The proposed project will provide safe and contiguous routes for pedestrians and bicyclists (Policy 3-P-17, 7-P-34, and 7-P40) in that a Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive is required as part of this project.
h. The proposed project will include bicycle racks in each garage for secure bicycle parking (Policy 7-P-45).
i. The Developer will equitably share the costs associated with providing water and wastewater services to the proposed project through payment of the Pittsburg Facilities Reserve Charge (Policy 11-P-7 and 11-P-18).
j. The proposed project will include window assembly upgrades for upper-floor windows of Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dB CNEL. The proposed project will also include sound walls for Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 and West Leland Road to ensure exterior noise levels do not exceed 65 dB CNEL (Policy 12-P-6).
k. The proposed project will comply with conditions of approval requiring construction of quality home designs to ensure future residents will enjoy an attractive living environment (Housing Goal G-5 and Policy P-5.1).
43 Resolution No.23- Page 6 of 9 November 20, 2023
Vesting Tentative Map:
4. The Vesting Tentative Map for the proposed 206-unit, Major Subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential, as described in Section 2.A.3 above.
5. The project site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site is vacant, that all project construction will occur at elevations below the major ridgelines within the southern hills, and the site is surrounded by existing infrastructure, minimizing the amount of work and investment needed to extend utilities and services to the site.
6. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that the site is surrounded by existing single- and multi-family, residential development. Further, the site is located within one and one-half mile of the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station, less than a quarter-mile of two existing bus routes, a quarter-mile from the future San Marco Commercial Center and is adjacent to single- and multi-family homes, making it an appropriate location for residential low-density development.
7. The design of the proposed subdivision and accompanying improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, if the project is required to comply with conditions of approval in Exhibit D and all applicable mitigation measures and conditions of approval as outlined in Exhibit D Attachment 4 - Appendix G of the “Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the San Marco Development Plan (for Siena at San Marco, Units 16 and 17),” dated May 5, 2023.
8. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements proposed will not cause serious public health problems, in that the project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List and conditions of approval will require all site improvements comply with all local, City, State and federal regulations.
9. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that there are no existing public access easements on the site. The proposed map does include a new public street that will connect the development to existing public roadways, and the new street will be of sufficient width to accommodate automobile and emergency vehicle access into and around the site.
Design Review:
10. The proposed project conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality, in that the 44 Resolution No.23- Page 7 of 9 November 20, 2023
proposed house models feature an attractive architectural design characterized by a mixture of hipped and gable-end roofs with high-quality, concrete tile roofing material; stucco body and trim; simulated stone veneer; roll-up garage doors with optional window lites and a mixture of board and batten siding, wood trim, window grids, shutters and mock vents. The proposed project will also provide an attractive outdoor environment for residents. The Developer will install a variety of colorful, drought-tolerant landscaping and a decorative, masonry sound wall with wall caps and simulated stone veneer at each wall pilaster. Residential front yards will feature blooming street trees that will provide seasonal color throughout the subdivision.
11. The proposed project will be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors which may tend to make the environment less desirable, in that the project will be required to install three, six-ft. tall sound walls along the southern edge of the project site nearest West Leland Road, one, eight-ft. tall and one, 10-ft. tall sound wall along the northern edge of the project site nearest State Route 4 and one, eight-ft. tall sound wall along the eastern edge of the project site to buffer noise from State Route 4, West Leland Road and the future San Marco Villas Phase III development. Additionally, upper-floor windows for 58 Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 must receive window assembly upgrades with a higher than average Sound Transmission Class rating.
12. The exterior design of the proposed project is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value. Rather, the proposed project will enhance the neighborhood’s appearance and value, in that it will result in a highly attractive environment utilizing a variety of compatible house and front yard landscape designs. The proposed project will add value to the community by attracting additional residential and commercial investment in the area.
13. The proposed project is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area, in that existing and proposed developments in the immediate vicinity of the project site are subject to the San Marco Development Plan, will be constructed by the same builder and include design elements compatible with other San Marco Subdivisions.
14. The proposed project will substantially conform to all applicable Development Review Design Guidelines (DRDG, Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864) for single-family development.
B. The City Council Staff Report entitled, “Adoption of a Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, 45 Resolution No.23- Page 8 of 9 November 20, 2023
DR),” dated November 20, 2023, is referenced hereto as additional support for findings.
Section 3. Decision
Based on the findings and the authority set forth above, the City Council hereby takes the following actions:
A. Amends General Plan Figure 2-2 (Land Use Diagram) to change the land use designation of the project site, from High Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space as substantially presented in Exhibit A of this resolution;
B. Modifies other Land Use Element tables and charts as necessary to reflect the change in land use acreages and maintain internal consistency with the General Plan document;
C. Approves Vesting Tentative Map 9554 (Exhibit B) subdividing the project site into 206 lots for detached single-family homes, subject to the conditions as substantially presented in Exhibit D of this resolution; and D. Approves design review of the accompanying architectural and landscape plans (Exhibit C), subject to the conditions as substantially presented in Exhibit D of this resolution.
Section 4. Effective Date of General Plan Map Amendment The General Plan Map Amendment approved by this resolution shall become effective immediately.
Section 5. Effective Date of Vesting Tentative Map for Major Subdivision and Design Review
The Major Subdivision and Design Review approved by this resolution shall become effective on the effective date of the applicable ordinance amending the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District. 46 Resolution No.23- Page 9 of 9 November 20, 2023
Section 6. Adoption
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 20th day of November 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Preston-Scales, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
47 MAY 3, 2023
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE
SIENA AT SAN MARCO
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT
PITTSBURG, CA
NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit A - General Plan Map Amendment, Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 48 MAY 3, 2023
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE
PARK
SIENA AT SAN MARCO
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT
PITTSBURG, CA
NOT TO SCALE
49 326
74479.07
55989.13
440.48
341
75840.87
57575.57
297.91
329.5
326.7 270.7
269.7
266.5
298.8
287.7
283.8
280.8
277.8
297.6
297.5
292.5
291.6
287.6
286.4
282.6
282.6
277.6
277.6
272.7
267.6
262.6
290.7
290.4
289.1
274.3
285.3
320.6
319.6
318.6
319.3
320.4
320.9 320.3
303.7
300.5
264.7
262.6
261.6
260.6
260.7
260.3
260.5
260.2
311.6
311.7
310.6
310.5
309.7
309.6
308.5
308.6
308.4
307.5
307.6
306.5
306.5
305.5
306.5
304.5
304.7
304.3
303.6
302.5
302.6
301.4
301.5
300.8
300.5
298.7
299.5
297.4
297.7
295.8
295.6
294.8
293.9
298.6
296.7
296.7
294.8
294.6
293.8
293.9
292.7
292.7
291.8
291.6
292.2
293.5
292.6
293.7
290.4
290.7
251.8
251.3
250.7
248.8
252.3
252.5
252.3
271.5
271.8
274.7
274.7
277.7
277.4
278.7
254.6
255.6
256.5
258.6
255.6
253.4
292.5
286.6
287.6
295.7
292.5
278.4
279.4
387.7
387.7
387.8
387.9
334.9
341.8
334.8
331.7
328.7
326.5
324.4
325.3
330.6
390.3
390.7
302.6
302.5
307.5
307.5
312.6
312.5
317.5
317.7
322.6
322.7
327.6
327.6
332.7
332.5
337.6
464.4
466.3
465.2
276.7
276.3
276.3
274.7
274.5
274.7
274.5
274.2
274.3
274.2
274.1
274.2
274.3
274.2
274.3
273.7
274.1
273.7
312.6
312.5
313.5
315.6 314.5
316.5
317.7
318.4
319.5
452.7
452.6
451.6
377.5
381.5
387.5
387.5
392.5
392.6
397.4
397.5
401.7
331.3
332.8
331.6
334.8
333.8
329.5
331.6
330.6
330.4
331.3
333.3
330.6
336.6
333.6
335.6
337.8
335.3
334.5
339.5
338.5
338.8
336.1
337.6
339.6
340.5
341.6
344.8
344.9
341.7
342.4
373.6
373.4
367.3
365.3
353.6
355.8
355.8
357.8
358.6
358.7
466.7
371.6
372.5
374.8
365.3
365.3
440.8
437.7
434.6
432.7
429.7
426.8
423.7
419.7
415.7
413.8
417.6
421.5
423.4
424.8
424.7
429.6
432.7
432.9
433.5
417.5
415.5
413.6
411.7
409.7
408.5
406.5
404.6
435.7
431.7
428.7
425.5
422.5 420.5
417.5
415.6
412.6
410.6
408.6
404.6
408.5
405.6
402.5
399.5
401.6
390
405
410
385
380
375
365
360
355
350
335
335
340
340
350
365
370
370
375
375
380
385
385
390
390
395
400
370
365
335
410
420
425
435
455
355
330
330
320
315
315
310
310
310
305
305
305
310
315
320
300
295
295
295
320
290
290
290
285
275
270
290
290
285
285
275
270
265
330
365
335
400
405
410
415 420 425
435445
450
455
465
475
485 480
490
430
405
400
390
425
395
400
370
345
340
415
335
345
345
350
355
355
360
360
365
380
395
330
365
405
415
430
440 445
450
355
330
325
325
325
320
320
315
305
300
300
300
295
285
280
280
280
265
275
280
280
275
275
260
255
255
250
325
355
360
390
270
345
280
410
405
400
415
430
440
460
470
425
420
390
255
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DIRT PILE
DIRT PILE
POOL
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
POOL
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
DELTA DE ANZA REGIONAL TRAIL
STATE ROUTE 4
VILLA DRIVE
W LELAND ROAD
VILLA TERRACE DRIVE
LA COSTA DRIVE
LA PAZ DRIVE
RIO SECO DRIVE
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
GROUND NOT VISIBLE
GROUND NOT VISIBLE
391.7
391.6
392.6
392.8
385
380
375
370
365 360
390
391.2
393.4
285.4
393.6
393.8
393.7
394.6
395.3
394.4 SCATTERED BRUSH
270
325
325
320
315
320
315
310
310
330
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
430
355
360
365
375
370
380
385
400
395
390
410
405
415
420
425
430
435
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
325
330
325
375
370
365
360
320
315
310
305
319
318
317
316
314
313
312
311
309
308
307
306
304
303
395
390
385
380
375
370
365
360
355
350
345
340
335
VILLA DRIVE
WEST LELAND ROAD
VILLAGE
SIENA
DRIVE
MESSINA CIRCLE
MESSINA CIRCLE
LIVORNO DRIVE
MESSINA CIRCLE
GIOVANNI DRIVE
PARCEL B
(GHAD)
PARCEL A
(GHAD)
PARCEL J
(GHAD)
LUCCA LANE
{\T0.85;PESARO LANE}
Δ
21 22
23 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
VILLA TERRACE DRIVE
7 6
27 26
25 24
23 19
20 21
22 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
Δ
UNIT 17
UNIT 16
5 4
3 2
1 103
102
101
100
99 98
300
390
385
380
375
370
365
360
355
350
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
345
360
350
340
330
320
310
335
330
325
330
330
N
STREET A
STREET B
1 2 3
4 5
6 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
18 19 17
20 21
22 23
24 25
PARCEL B
(GHAD)
PARCEL D
(GHAD)
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
128 127
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
19 {PARCEL K
(DOG PARK)}
Δ
Δ
PARCEL L
PARCEL M
PARCEL N
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
{\LLOCATION MAP}
SCALE: 1"=100'
CURB RAMP
RETAINING WALL
CENTER LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
LOT LINE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STREET LIGHT
STORM DRAIN
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER
STORM WATER INLET
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
WATER VALVE
FENCE
CURB & GUTTER
EASEMENT LINE
%%UPROPOSED
%%UDESCRIPTION %%UEXISTING
LEGEND
130 CONTOUR ELEVATIONS
EX FC
x 525.2 SPOT ELEVATION 525.2
SIDEWALK/WALKWAY
8"SS EX 12"SS
130
12"W EX 12"W
12"SD EX 12"SD
%%uABBREVIATIONS
ABAGGREGATE BASE
ACASPHALT CONCRETE
BWBOTTOM OF WALL
CLCENTER LINE
DIDROP INLET
DWDOMESTIC WATER
EVAEEMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
EXEXISTING
FCFACE OF CURB
FGFINISHED GRADE
FHFIRE HYDRANT
FLFLOW LINE
GBGRADE BREAK
GHADGEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT
HPHIGH POINT
INVINVERT ELEVATION
LPLOW POINT
MAXMAXIMUM
MINMINIMUM
PPAD ELEVATION
PAEPUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT
PAVPAVEMENT
PLPROPERTY LINE
PAEPRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
PUEPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
RWRIGHT OF WAY
SDSTORM DRAIN
SSSANITARY SEWER
SSESANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SLSTREET LIGHT
STDSTANDARD
SWKSIDEWALK
SSESANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
TCTOP OF CURB
TGTOP OF GRATE
TRWTOP OF RETAINING WALL
TWTOP OF WALL
TYPTYPICAL
WWATER LINE
WLEWATER LINE EASEMENT
FOR: WEST COAST HOME BUILDERS, INC
MARCO SAN
4 %%UVICINITY MAP%%U
NOT TO SCALE
N
{PROJECTSITE}
1.OWNER/DEVELOPER: WEST COAST HOME BUILDERS, INC
4021 PORT CHICAGO HIGHWAY CONCORD, CA
94520
PHONE: (925) 682-6419
CONTACT: LOUIS PARSONS
2.CIVIL ENGINEER: RUGGERI-JENSEN-AZAR
4690 CHABOT DRIVE, SUITE 200
PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: (925) 227-9100
CONTACT: EDDIE SIEU, RCE #44189
3.GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: ENGEO INC.
2010 CROW CANYON PLACE, SUITE 250
SAN RAMON, CA 94583
PHONE: (925) 866-9000
CONTACT: THEODORE BAYHAM
4.ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 091-050-047
091-050-050
5.EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT PARCEL
6.EXISTING GENERAL PLAN: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
7.PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
8.PRESENT ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
9.PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
10.GROSS AREA:a. UNIT 16 = 10.06%%P ACRES
b. UNIT 17 = {47.67%%P ACRES
}TOTAL = 57.73%%P ACRES
11.NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED: a. {UNIT 16}
1. RESIDENTIAL LOTS = 25
2. OPEN SPACE LOTS ={ 4
} TOTAL = 29
b. {UNIT 17}
1. RESIDENTIAL LOTS = 181
2. OPEN SPACE LOTS ={ 14 }
TOTAL = 195
c. TOTAL (UNIT 16+UNIT 17) = 224
12.MINIMUM LOT SIZE: UNIT 16: 3,363 SQUARE FEET (LOT 2) UNIT 17: 3,375 SQUARE FEET (LOT 70-72)
13.MAXIMUM LOT SIZE: UNIT 16: 16,225 SQUARE FEET (LOT 17) UNIT 17: 24,001 SQUARE FEET (LOT 18)
14.WATER: CITY OF PITTSBURG/ CCWD
15.SEWAGE: CITY OF PITTSBURG/ DETLA DIABLO
{\LGENERAL NOTES}
N
{\LSHEET INDEX}
{\LSHEET NO.}
C1.0 TITLE SHEET
C1.1 TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS
C2.0 U17 EXISTING CONDITION PLAN
C2.1 U16 EXISTING CONDITION PLAN
C3.0 U17 PROPOSED LOTTING PLAN
C3.1 U16 PROPOSED LOTTING PLAN
C4.0 U17 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
C4.1 U16 PRELIMINARY GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
C5.0 U17 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
C5.1 U16 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
100
100 200 300
0 1 inch = ft.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BM NO. 1571,
BEING A STANDARD COUNTY DISK SET IN TOP OF CURB
AT NW CORNER OF SHIRLEY STREET & SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE
ELEVATION = 133.693 (NGVD 29)
T.B.M. NO. 34: CUT X ON MEDIAN IN WEST LELAND ROAD, 270%%P EAST
OF INTERSECTION OF WEST LELAND ROAD AND SAN MARCO
BOULEVARD
4690 CHABOT DRIVE, SUITE 200 PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE: (925) 227-9100 FAX: (925) 227-9300
E N G N E E R S P A N N E R S S U R E Y O R S
G:\\JOB2019\\191073U17\\CAD FILES\\02-PLANNING\\TENT-MAP\\TM-C1.00CV-191073U17.DWG 6/2/2023 10:09:35 AM DOMINIC CARUCCI {\Q0;DATE: JUNE 1, 2023} {\Q0;JOB NO. 191073U17}
\pxi-3,l3;17.IT IS THE INTENT OF THE DEVELOPER TO FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS AFTER THE VESTING TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL.
D
D
E
C
E
S
T
A T
E
OF C A
F
O
R
N
A
No. 44189 R
E
E
N
G
N
E
A
N
O OF E S S
PR
D
E
R
E
T
S
G
E
R
S
E E U
E K.
Exhibit B
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
Exhibit C - Architectural and Landscape Plans, Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 60 DISCOVERY
DESIGN
GROUP
MAY 8, 2023
1 TWO
STORY
2 TWO
STORY
3 TWO
STORY
33 18.2%
COUNT
PERCENT
PLAN#
26 14.3%
30 16.6%
DISTRIBUTION TABLE
TYPICAL MINIMUM
LOT SETBACKS
N.T.S.
4 TWO
STORY
28 15.5%
5 TWO
STORY
34 18.8%
6 TWO
STORY
26 14.4%
SCALE: 1'=80'
181
100%
7 THREE
STORY
4 2.2%
MINIMUM LOT
SETBACKS (TYP.)
SHEET 1 OF 2
MASTER PLOTTING PLAN
PITTSBURG, CA
SIENA AT SAN MARCO
SUBDIVISION 9554 UNITS 16 & 17
61 1
TWO
STORY
3 TWO
STORY
7 28%
COUNT
PERCENT
PLAN#
5 20%
DISTRIBUTION TABLE
TYPICAL MINIMUM
LOT SETBACKS
N.T.S.
5 TWO
STORY
5 20%
25 100%
7 THREE
STORY
8 32%
MINIMUM LOT
SETBACKS (TYP.)
MAY 8, 2023 SCALE: 1'=30' SHEET 2 OF 2
DISCOVERY
DESIGN
GROUP
MASTER PLOTTING PLAN
PITTSBURG, CA
SIENA AT SAN MARCO
SUBDIVISION 9554 UNITS 16 & 17
62 63
First Floor Plan DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 1 64 Second Floor Plan DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 1 65 Roof Plan 'A' Right Rear Left Plan 1 Elevations - 'A'
DISCOVERYDESIGN
GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 66 Roof Plan 'B' Right Rear Left Plan 1 Elevations - 'B' DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 67 Roof Plan 'C' Right Rear Left Plan 1 Elevations - 'C' DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 68 69 First Floor Plan Plan 2DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 70 Second Floor Plan Opt. Bedrm. 5 Plan 2DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 71 Elevations - 'A' Plan 2 Roof Plan 'A' DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Right Rear Left 72 Elevations - 'B' Plan 2 Roof Plan 'B' DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Right Rear Left 73 Elevations - 'C' Plan 2 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Roof Plan 'C' Right Rear Left 74 75 First Floor Plan Plan 3 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 76 Second Floor Plan Plan 3 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 77 Elevations - 'A' Plan 3 Roof Plan 'A' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 78 Elevations - 'B' Plan 3 Roof Plan 'B' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 79 Elevations - 'C' Roof Plan 'C' Plan 3 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Right Rear Left 80 81 First Floor Plan Plan 4 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 82 Second Floor Plan Plan 4 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 83 Elevations - 'A' Plan 4 Roof Plan 'A' Right Rear Left
DISCOVERYDESIGN
GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 84 Elevations - 'B' Plan 4 Roof Plan 'B' Right Rear
DISCOVERYDESIGN
GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Left 85 Elevations - 'C' Plan 4 Roof Plan 'C' Right Rear
DISCOVERYDESIGN
GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Left 86 87 First Floor Plan DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 5 88 Second Floor Plan DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 5 89 Elevations - 'A' Plan 5 Roof Plan 'A' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 90 Elevations - 'B' Plan 5 Roof Plan 'B' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 91 Elevations - 'C' Plan 5 Roof Plan 'C' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 92 93 First Floor Plan
DISCOVERYDESIGN
GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 6 94 Second Floor Plan DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 6 95 Elevations - 'A' Plan 6 Roof Plan 'A' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 96 Elevations - 'B' Plan 6 Roof Plan 'B' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 97 Elevations - 'C' Plan 6 Roof Plan 'C' Right Rear Left DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 98 99 Entry Level DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 7 100 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Main Level Plan 7 101 DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Upper Level Plan 7 102 Right Roof Plan 'A' Rear Left Elevations - 'A' DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 7 103 Right Roof Plan 'B' Rear Left Elevations - 'B' DISCOVERY DESIGN GROUP PITTSBURG, CA UNIT 16 & 17 Discovery Builders Inc. SAN MARCO Date 12/15/2021 Plan 7 104 105
106
107
PARCEL B PARCEL A PUMP STATION MESSINA CIRCLE
MESSINA CIRCLE
MESSINA CIRCLE
LIVORNO DRIVE
BRINDISI DRIVE
SIENA VILLAGE DRIVE
SIENA VILLAGE DRIVE SIENA VILLAGE DRIVE CATANIA COURT
CASINA CIRCLE
CASINA CIRCLE
CASINA CIRCLE GIOVANNI DRIVE
PESARO LANE
LUCCA LANE
FUTURE WEST LELAND ROAD
WEST LELAND ROAD PARCEL H PARCEL G PARCEL F PARCEL E PARCEL K DOG PARK UNIT 17 PARCEL I PARCEL D (EVA) AGRICULTURAL NATURAL RESOURCES STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL J (GHAD) PARCEL A (GHAD) PARCEL B (GHAD) PARCEL C POCKET PARK RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL STATE ROUTE 4 NOISE BARRIER (10 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE LOCATIONS AT CORNERS (SEE SHEET L3) PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE LOCATIONS AT CORNERS (SEE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL STATE ROUTE 4 NOISE BARRIER (8 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL STATE ROUTE 4 SOUND BARRIER (10 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL STATE ROUTE 4 SOUND BARRIER (8 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL PROPOSED WEST LELAND ROAD NOISE BARRIER (6 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL PROPOSED WEST LELAND ROAD NOISE BARRIER (6 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) Thomas Baak & Associates, LLP
Landscape Architects
1620 North Main Street, Suite 4
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Ph: 925.933.2583
SIENA AT SAN MARCO UNITS 16 & 17
PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA
SEENO CONSTRUCTION x REFER TO SHEET L2 FOR UNIT 16 PARCEL REFER TO SHEET L3 FOR TREE IMAGES, PROJECT WALL IMAGE, FENCE AND MONUMENT SIGN DETAILS
STREET TREE AND
WALL PLAN L1 LANDSCAPE LEGEND: (ALL TREES TO BE 15 GALLON SIZE) SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QUANITITY ACER RUBRUM 'OCTOBER GLORY' RED MAPLE 38 CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS 'PINK DAWN' CHITALPA 50 LAURUS NOBILIS 'SARATOGA' (STD) STD. SARATOGA LAUREL 90 GEIJERA PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW 100 EX. STREET TREE ALONG W. LELAND ROAD PARCEL E,F,G,H,COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE TREATMENT PARCELS A,B & J - OPEN SPACE (GHAD) PARCEL K - DOG PARK PARCEL C - POCKET PARK SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L2 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L2
PROJECT SOUNDWALL: SIERRA PRECAST 'CLASSIC STYLE' (SEE SHEET L3)PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT STREET INTERSECTIONS (SEE SHEET L3) OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE ADJACENT OPEN SPACE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD RESIDENTIAL FENCE 108
PARCEL B (GHAD)
STREET 'A'
STREET 'B' PARCEL A PUMP STATION
SIENA VILLAGE DRIV
SIENA VILLAGE DRIVE CATANIA COURT
WEST LELAND ROAD
WEST LELAND ROAD PARCEL G PARCEL F PARCEL E UNIT 16 SANTA TERESA DRIVE PARCEL D (GHAD) PARCEL C (GHAD) PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE LOCATIONS AT CORNERS (SEE SHEET L3) (SEE SHEET L3)RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL PROPOSED WEST LELAND ROAD NOISE BARRIER (6 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD FENCE (SEE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL PROPOSED WEST LELAND ROAD NOISE BARRIER (6 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL PROPOSED WEST LELAND ROAD NOISE BARRIER (6 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) RECOMMENDED PROJECT SOUND WALL PROPOSED WEST LELAND ROAD NOISE BARRIER (6 FT. TALL) (SEE IMAGE SHEET L3) PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE LOCATIONS AT CORNERS (SEE SHEET L3) Thomas Baak & Associates, LLP
Landscape Architects
1620 North Main Street, Suite 4
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Ph: 925.933.2583
SIENA AT SAN MARCO UNITS 16 & 17
PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA
SEENO CONSTRUCTION x
STREET TREE AND
WALL PLAN L2 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L1 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET L1 REFER TO SHEET L1 FOR UNIT 17 PARCEL REFER TO SHEET L3 FOR TREE IMAGES, PROJECT WALL IMAGE, FENCE AND MONUMENT SIGN DETAILS LANDSCAPE LEGEND: (ALL TREES TO BE 15 GALLON SIZE) SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QUANITITY ACER RUBRUM 'OCTOBER GLORY' RED MAPLE 38 CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS 'PINK DAWN' CHITALPA 50 LAURUS NOBILIS 'SARATOGA' (STD) STD. SARATOGA LAUREL 90 GEIJERA PARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW 100 PROJECT SOUNDWALL: SIERRA PRECAST 'CLASSIC STYLE' (SEE SHEET L3) PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT SIGNAGE AT STREET INTERSECTIONS (SEE SHEET L3) OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE ADJACENT OPEN SPACE (SEE SHEET L3) SOLID WOOD RESIDENTIAL FENCE COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS PARCELS A - PUMP STATION PARCELS B, C & D - OPEN SPACE (GHAD) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS EX. STREET TREE ALONG W. LELAND RD. 109 Thomas Baak & Associates, LLP
Landscape Architects
1620 North Main Street, Suite 4
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Ph: 925.933.2583
SIENA AT SAN MARCO UNITS 16 & 17
PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA
SEENO CONSTRUCTION x Acer rubrum 'October Glory' RED MAPLE Chitalpa tashkentensis 'Pink Dawn' CHITALPA TREE Laurus nobilis 'Saratoga' SARATOGA LAUREL Geijera parviflora AUSTRALIAN WILLOW NO SCALE PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN DETAIL 9'
6' 10' 18' PROJECT SIGNAGE: SIGN ATTACHED TO PROJECT WALL. PROJECT NAME LETTERS SET ON 12" SQ. DIAGONAL TILE BACKGROUND WITH PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM. PROJECT SOUNDWALL: SIERRA PRECAST 'CLASSIC STYLE' WALL WITH ATTACHED COLUMNS (BEIGE COLOR). WALL HEIGHT TO BE DETERMINED BY ACOUSTICAL STUDY. SMOOTH BASE SURFACE W/ REVEAL. SMOOTH CAP SURFACE W/ (2) REVEALS.
IMAGES AND
DETAILS L3 OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE 'SAN MARCO CLASSIC STYLE' WALL OPEN VIEW WIRE FENCE DETAIL 3'-0" 4"x4" PTDF NOTES: ALL WOOD TO BE ROUGH SAWN C. C. GRADE REDWOOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. HOLD TOP RAIL LEVEL; STEP FENCE & ALTER PANEL WIDTH AS NECESSARY TO CONFORM TO GRADES. 12" CONCRETE FOOTING STAPLE TO FRAME 4"X4" W.W. MESH 2"X4" TOP 1"X4" PLANT-ONS 2"x6" CAP 2"
6'-0" & BOTTOM RAILS POST @ 8' O.C. FINISH GRADE
3" NOTES: 1. ALL POSTS TO BE PRESSURE TREATED DOUGLAS FIR, ALL OTHER WOOD MEMBERS TO BE ROUGH SAWN C.C.GRADE REDWOOD 2. RAILS TO CONFORM TO GRADES. 3. ALL METAL FASTENERS SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 6 FT. HEIGHT SOLID WOOD FENCE DETAIL NO SCALE ABCDE 36" 3" 12"Ø HI ELEVATION: SECTION: ABCDG DESCRIPTION: A - 2x4 CONTINUOUS CAP B - 1x4 RSDF DOUBLE CLEATS AT RAILS C - 1x8 RSDF VERTICAL BOARDS, OVERLAP 1" D - 4x4 PTDF POSTS AT 8 FT. SPACING (MAX). E - FINISH GRADE F - 1x2 VERTICAL STAKES SELF-SPACED, W/ 1" NAIL STRIPS G - 2x8 PTDF KICKER BETWEEN TALL POSTS, EXTEND OVER LOW POSTS H - 18" DIAMETER x 36" DEEP CONCRETE FOOTING AT POSTS I - WOOD POSTS EXTEND 3" THRU BOTTOM OF CONCRETE FOOTING INTO 4" DEEP CLEAN SAND BASE J - 2x4 BOTTOM RAIL E G 10" J J
6'-0"
6'-0" 10" STREET TREES 110
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
City of Pittsburg Planning Division
1. Conformity with Project Plans
The project shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the Vesting Tentative Map for Subdivision 9554 (Sheets C1.0, C1.1, C2.0, C2.1, C3.0, C3.1, C4.0, C4.1, C5.0 and C5.1) dated June 1, 2023; the Street Tree and Wall Plan dated May 23, 2023 (Sheets L1, L2 and L3); the Master Plotting Plans for Units 16 and 17 dated May 8, 2023; the Architectural and Street Elevation Plans dated December 15, 2021, except as hereinafter may be modified. Any major changes to the project plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission at the City Planner’s discretion.
2. Contingent Approval
Approval of the Vesting Tentative Map and Design Review is contingent upon City Council adoption of an ordinance approving: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment changing the parcel’s land use designation from High Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, and 2) an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and Planned Development District (PD-1362) specifying land use and development regulations for Siena at San Marco (Units 16 and 17).
3. Final Plot Plans
Final plot plans shall be in substantial conformity with the Master Plotting Plans for Units 16 and 17, dated May 8, 2023, noted above. Minor plot plan rearrangements may be made subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. The Developer shall ensure that:
a) rearrangements shall not result in more than two of the same Plan 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 house models being located next to one another. b) where two of the same house models are placed next to one another, a different elevation (either A, B, or C) and different color scheme shall be applied to each house model.
c) all individual plot plans submitted to the Planning Division for review shall note the proposed house plan, elevation, and color scheme, and whether the house plan has been reversed.
4. Final Architectural Plans
Final Architectural Plans shall reflect the following modifications, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division:
a) Board and batten siding, stone/brick veneer, and ledger details, where indicated on front elevations, shall be extended around all adjacent sides to the fence line.
b) All base trim details (including brick or stone veneer or stucco pop-outs), Exhibit D
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 111
located along the bottom portion of the first floor and that wrap around the corner to the left or right side elevation of the house, shall extend all the way to the point at which the fence line intersects the respective side wall and to the foundation line, where applicable.
c) Siding, veneer, or ledger details shall be wrapped around all exposed sides of porch pillars. Trim details shall be included between stucco and board and batten siding or veneer transitions, where appropriate. d) Street-facing rear elevation enhancements (window grids, shutters and design elements) are required on the second floor of all Unit 16 and 17 residences facing State Route 4 and West Leland Road as indicated in Attachment 1.
e) Street-facing side elevation enhancements (window grids, shutters and design elements) are required on the second floor of all Unit 16 and 17 residences as indicated in Attachment 2.
5. Additional Green Building Features
The project is required to meet the Residential Mandatory Measures specified under the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code. In addition to those measures, the project shall implement the following Residential Voluntary Measures:
a) A4.106.5 Cool roof for reduction of heat island effect b) A4.106.8 Pre-wire for electric vehicle (EV) charging for new construction
6. Final Landscape Plans
Final Landscape Plans shall reflect the following modifications, subject to review and approval by the Planning Division:
a) Pre-emergent herbicide shall be provided for all planting areas. Planting areas shall receive a three-inch layer of light brown or black bark mulch dressing.
b) Mailbox cluster units shall have a tan finish.
7. Installation of Landscaping and Irrigation
Prior to occupancy of the houses by residents, the Developer shall complete installation of landscaping and automatic irrigation systems in street landscape areas and front and corner side yards of respective lots, in accordance with Article VII (Landscaping, Irrigation and Hydroseeding) of PMC Chapter 18.84, or other applicable water efficient landscape ordinance, subject to approval by the Community and Economic Development Department. The Developer shall provide the irrigation system controller map, programming table, and annual maintenance schedules to new owners upon sale/transfer of ownership of the residential property from the Developer to the buyer. Typical front yard landscaping shall include a minimum of one street tree and one smaller ornamental tree per lot, along with a combination of shrubbery and ground cover. If required landscaping is 112
not completed prior to final inspection and occupancy, the Developer shall post a bond to assure that the work is completed to the satisfaction of the City.
Note: 90 London Plane Tree shall be replaced with Saratoga Laurel or Sweet Bay and 100 Frontier Elm shall be replaced with Australian Willow.
8. Water-Efficient Model Home
At least one of the model houses built in Unit 16 and one of the model houses built in Unit 17 shall demonstrate water-efficient landscaping techniques in accordance with Article 7 of Chapter 18.84 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Developer shall make available to potential buyers brochures or other written or graphic media that informs visitors and potential buyers about the principles of water-efficient landscapes, including but not limited to those principles that are described in PMC Chapter 18.84, Article VII.
9. Street Lights and Spacing
The Developer shall provide a photometric graph and table to determine the appropriate street light spacing for the project. An approved lighting software program that clearly indicates the Average Luminance/Minimum Luminance Uniformity ratio of the roadway within the project area is to be used for the lighting calculations (see City Standard Detail T-1 for details). The Developer shall install single-head luminaire poles with LED cobra head post top light fixtures, throughout the subdivision in accordance with the photometric graph and table.
10. AC Unit Placement
Air conditioning units shall be placed along the wall in the rear or side yards with a minimum of three feet unobstructed access around the unit, except that one side of the unit may have less than a three-foot separation between the unit and a wall of the house.
11. Rooftop Equipment
Roof vents shall be painted the same color as roofing material to which they are adjacent. Downspouts, side vents, attached utility boxes, and hose bibs shall be painted the same color or colors as the surface or surfaces to which they are adjacent.
12. Address Identification
The Developer shall install, on each residence, minimum four-inch high, block style numbers that contrast with the building façade for address identification purposes.
The construction drawings submitted for each house model shall identify the location of the address box or number(s) on the house façade, along with a detail or keynote that describes how the house number will be illuminated or made identifiable from the street or shared driveways, as applicable.
13. Refuse Management Plan
The Developer shall prepare a Refuse Management Plan to promote the safe, 113
efficient, and timely pickup of refuse by Mt. Diablo Resource Recovery. The Plan shall specify: 1) the designated areas for placement of refuse carts; 2) the designated pickup days and timeframes; and 3) parking restrictions along designated pickup areas. The Plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Manager prior to issuance of the first building permit. The Developer shall provide each prospective home buyer with a disclosure advising them of the Refuse Management Plan. An additional disclosure shall be provided to residents on Lucca and Pesaro Lanes in Unit 17 and on Street B in Unit 16 noting that, due to the narrow width of roadway, parking along the curb on designated pickup days will prevent ability of Mt. Diablo Resource and Recovery to provide service to homes.
Each proposed single-family residence shall provide a concrete trash pad. All 206 proposed lots shall be able to accommodate three bins (refuse, recyclables, organics) at the curb in the front of each residence. All bins shall be sized to ensure compliance with requirements of Senate Bill 1383 (2016). Unit 16, Lots 17 and 25, shall bring carts out to main road due to length of driveway.
14. Windows
The Developer is required to provide window assembly upgrades for upper-floor windows of Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 as depicted in Attachment 3 to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dB CNEL (Policy 12-P-4).
15. Sound Walls
The Developer is required to provide sound walls for Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 and West Leland Road as depicted in Attachment 3 to ensure exterior noise levels do not exceed 65 dB CNEL (Policy 12-P-6).
16. San Marco Development Final SEIR Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval
The developer shall comply with the environmental impact mitigation measures and conditions of approval identified in Attachment 4.
Standard Conditions of Development
A. Project Site
1. The applicant shall comply with all regulations and code requirements of the Building Division, Engineering Division, Contra Costa Fire Protection District, the Police Department and any other agencies requiring review of the project. If required, these agencies shall be supplied copies of the final building and site plans.
2. Developer shall provide written notification to adjacent property owners for any drainage work required to collect or convey storm water runoff, which may or will affect their properties.
114
3. During construction water trucks or sprinkler systems are to be used in sufficient quantities to mitigate and minimize dust from leaving the site during any earthmoving and/or construction activities.
4. CC&R’s (Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions) for the project shall contain appropriate provisions for joint maintenance of any infrastructure, roadways, utilities, landscaping and irrigation as determined necessary by the City Engineer.
5. Developer shall submit a study addressing on site storm water and sewer system capabilities. If the study indicates that the present system is inadequate, the developer must provide plans and install any additional storm water and sanitary sewer facilities including off-site improvements to correct storm water runoff and sanitary sewer demands anticipated for upstream buildout in accordance with the Pittsburg General Plan.
6. Environmental and engineering studies, as directed by the Planning and Building Director, must be complete and on file prior to commencement to plan checking.
Developer shall install off- street improvements determined necessary by the City Engineer to provide safe traffic conditions.
7. All site development shall comply with title 12 (Streets, Sidewalks and Utilities), Title 13 (Water and Sewers) and Chapter 15.88 (Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control) of the Pittsburg Municipal Code as determined by the City Engineer. Issuance of a site development permit will be required whereby specific engineering requirements will be made as conditions of approval of that permit.
8. The CC&R’s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site or parcels unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on the public street for long than 72 hours.
9. All retaining walls adjacent to public right-of-ways shall be provided with decorative treatment, subject to approval by the Planning Division.
10. The design of any masonry soundwall shall be approved by the Planning and Building Department. It shall match or harmonize with existing soundwalls of neighboring projects along that street. All masonry or sound walls shall be staggered when adjacent to public right of way.
B. Architecture
1. All mechanical, irrigation, ground and/or roof mounted equipment shall be architecturally screened from view from all public right-of-ways prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy.
115
2. All vents, gutters, downspouts, flashing electrical conduits, etc., shall be painted or finished to match the color of the adjacent surface unless otherwise directed by the Planning Commission.
3. Soffits and other architectural elements visible from view but not detailed on the plans shall be finished in a material in harmony with the exterior of the building.
4. Finish quality of exterior design elements including, but not limited to, building façades and landscaping shall be subject to approval of the Planning Division prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.
C. Landscaping
1. All slope banks in public landscape areas in excess of five (5) feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, one 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover 12-24 inches oncenter. In addition, public landscape slope banks in excess of eight (8) feet in vertical eight and 2:1 or greater slope also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this condition shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to City acceptance.
2. All planting shall be maintained in good growing condition. Such maintenance shall include, where appropriate, pruning, mowing, weeding, cleaning of debris and trash, fertilizing and regular watering. Whenever necessary, planting shall be replaced with other plant materials to ensure continued compliance with applicable landscaping requirements. Required irrigation systems shall be fully maintained in sound operating condition with heads periodically cleaned and replaced when missing to insure continued regular watering of landscape areas, and health and vitality of landscape materials.
D. General Requirements
1. Final inspection for occupancy permits will not be granted until all construction and landscaping is complete in accordance with approved plans.
2. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Pittsburg, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this approval, or any aspect of the City’s consideration of applicant’s project. The applicant recognizes and agrees that applicant’s voluntary commitment to meet the obligations described in this condition is an integral factor in the City’s approval of this project. The intent of this condition is to require the applicant to 116
bear the cost of any and all litigation instituted to overturn or in any way modify the City’s approval of this project. Such costs include without limitation, any award of attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff or petitioner. In the event the city becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City shall promptly notify the applicant and shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant, or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, it both the following occur:
a. the City bears its own attorneys’ fees and costs; and b. the City defends the action in good faith. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless the applicant approves the settlement.
3. Entitlements associated with this approval may be recalled to the Planning Commission or City Council for review at any time due to complaints regarding lack of compliance with conditions of approval, traffic congestion, noise generation, or other adverse operating characteristics. At such time, the Commission or the Council may add/modify conditions of approval.
4. It is the responsibility of the applicant or developer to check with each agency for requirements that may pertain to their project.
5. All signs shall be submitted to the Planning Division for design review per Title 19 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code.
6. All landscape areas shall be maintained in a healthy, thriving and weed free condition.
7. The site shall be maintained in a neat and clean manner free of trash and debris.
8. All outdoor mechanical equipment, satellite dishes, fire main and all rooftop equipment shall be fully visually screened upon installation subject to the approval of the Planning Division. Screening devices shall be shown on construction and/or landscape plans.
9. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall supply the City with an ACAD computer disk file showing plans that reflect the project as it was build (As-Builts) at the discretion of the Planning and Building Director.
E. Standard Conditions of Approval Requiring Minimum Construction Site Management Practices
1. Prior to commencement of any site work that will result in a land disturbance of five acres or more, the project sponsor shall submit to the City a copy of the 117
Notice of Intent (NOI) sent the State Water Resources Control Board and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared for the project, as required by the State’s General Construction Activity Permit.
2. All storm drains, which serve the site, shall be protected from spills and soil runoff (from unpaved parking areas). The applicant may use “Any Source Control” BMP (Best Management Practice) as listed in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbook for storm water run-ff for commercial and industrial sites. Storm drains will be inspected periodically. Questions may be referred to City NPDES Coordinator, at 925-252-4920.
City of Pittsburg Building Division
1. On the cover sheet, please indicate the building Design Codes applicable to this project. The City of Pittsburg has adopted and enforces the following building Design Codes: 2022 California Administrative Code (CAC), 2022 California Building (CBC), 2022 California Historical Building Code (CHBC), 2022 California Existing Building Code (CEBC), 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CGBSC), 2022 California Mechanical Code (CMC), 2022 California Plumbing Code (CPC), 2022 California Electrical Code (CEC), 2022 California Energy Code (CEC Part 6), 2022 California Fire Code and the Pittsburg Municipal Code (RMC). Reference CRC Sec. 106.
2. On the cover sheet, please verify the Drawing Index includes all plan sheets.
And design criteria. Reference CRC section R106.
3. The preparation of plans and documents shall be prepared by a registered design professional where required per statutes of the City of Pittsburg where the project is being built. The licensed architect or engineer shall affix a stamp to the plans as evidence of the person’s responsibility for the documents.
Licensed Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical Contractors may design the systems that they are to install. On plans not required to have a design professional and are designed by a plans designer shall sign every sheet.
4. The Site Plan shall show the size and location of the new construction and existing structures on the site and distances from lot lines and other structures, and include where the residence ties into sewer, power and water from the street.
5. All supporting documents are included but are not limited to, truss plans and calculations with a letter of approval for the trusses by the EOR. Energy calculations and all other pertinent information for this project.
City of Pittsburg Engineering Division
Engineering Fees and Deposits:
118
1. Major Subdivision Map Processing Fee. The applicant shall pay the subdivision map processing fee according to the following amounts as applicable to the project:
1st – 3rd Final Map Check 4th Final Map Check
5-50 lots $2,300 $2,300 + $800/ea. additional map check 51-150 lots $3,000 $3,000 + $1,500/ea. additional map
check
151 more $3,365 $3,365 + $1,330/ea. additional map
check
50% of this fee shall be submitted with the first plan submittal. The remaining balance shall be paid in full to the Engineering Division prior to the City Council’s approval of the final map.
2. Improvement Plan Check Fee. The total improvement plan review fee is 4.5% of the engineer’s estimate for the cost of improvements. An initial payment of 50% of the estimated total improvement plan review fee is to be submitted to the Engineering Division with the engineer’s estimate with the first plans submittal.
The remainder of the fee shall be due payable prior to the issuance of an engineering site development permit.
3. Improvement Inspection Fee. The applicant shall pay an improvement inspection fee according to the following rates as applicable to the project:
Percent of Engineer’s Estimate Total Estimated Project Costs
7.5% greater than or equal to $500,000
5% $500,001 - $5 million
4.6% $5 million or less
The improvement inspection fee shall be due payable prior to the issuance of an engineering site development permit.
4. Grading Plan Check Deposit
The total grading plan review fee is 2.5% of the engineer’s estimated cost for grading, or it may be based upon cubic yards of earth disturbance as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. An initial payment of 50% of the estimated total grading plan review fee is to be submitted to the Engineering Division with the engineer’s estimate with the first plans submittal. The remainder of the fee shall be due payable prior to issuance of a grading permit.
5. Grading Inspection Fee
The grading inspection fee is 3% of the engineer’s estimated for the cost of grading. The grading inspection fee may also be based upon an approved 119
engineer’s estimate of total cubic yards, according to the current schedule of grading fee charges as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule.
The developer shall pay the following fees prior to the issuance of Building permits:
6. Facility Reserve Charge
The applicant shall pay the City of Pittsburg Facilities Reserve Charge (PMC Chapters 13.08, 13.12 and 13.24) (the “FRC”) to the Engineering Division, for water and sewer service in the amounts in effect when the applicant obtains a building permit. The applicant understands that the current FRC on file, effective August 20, 2005, shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule approved by Resolution No. 05-10290, and amended by Resolution No. 12-11778, on February 21, 2012, a copy of which is available at the City.
7. Local Transportation Mitigation Fee (LTMF)
The developer shall fulfill their financial obligations with regard to the LTMF (PMC Chapter 15.90) in accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding originally approved on January 19, 1993, and amended on December 4, 2000, February 4, 2002, and June 4, 2003. The developer shall pay the LTMF on each single-family dwelling unit and any detached, non-affordable accessory dwelling unit, or provide the City with bonds for LTMF at the rate in place at the time of building permit issuance. The developer further understands that the LTMF is reviewed and adjusted annually to the current Construction Cost Index (CCI) and may be increased at the City Council’s discretion based on revised cost estimates for roadway and transit facilities and other factors that demonstrate an increase is needed to offset traffic impacts caused by new development.
8. Regional Traffic Mitigation Fee
The applicant shall pay the Regional Transportation-Development Impact Mitigation Fee (PMC Chapter 15.103) (the “RTDIM”) amount in effect when the applicant obtains a building permit. The RTDIM will be automatically increased or decreased on January 1 of each year based on the percent change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Costs Index – San Francisco Bay Area, between September 1 and September 1 of the preceding two calendar years.
9. Sanitary Sewer Inspection Fee
The applicant shall pay the sanitary sewer inspection fee as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The Sanitary Sewer Close Circuit Television Inspection Fee is $1,000 flat fee for the first 1,000 feet, plus $1.50/linear foot for each additional linear foot over 300 feet.
10.Storm Drain Inspection Fee
The applicant shall pay the storm drain inspection deposit as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule. The Storm Drain Close Circuit Television 120
Inspection Fee is $1,000 flat fee for the first 1,000 feet, plus $1.50/linear foot for each additional linear foot over 300 feet.
11.Geographical Information System
The applicant shall pay the Geographic Information System fee as set forth in the City’s Master Fee Schedule, at the rate in place at the time of Engineering Permit issuance for construction of Site Improvements. The current fee is $119 per dwelling unit (for residential projects) and $119 per unit plus $0.06/sf (for nonresidential projects).
12.Bacteriological Testing.
The applicant shall pay the bacteriological testing fee in the amount of $239 for the first test and $80 for any required subsequent re-testing.
13.Supplemental Studies.
If additional engineering studies are deemed necessary by the City Engineer, i.e. geotechnical, structural, hydraulic, etc., or expedited reviews are requested by the applicant, the applicant shall pay for all costs related to the extra work. The costs may include the preparation of special studies, additional staff time, and/or reviews of the special studies if studies are prepared by the applicant’s engineer.
Engineering Submittals: The applicant shall submit electronic, pdf. files of the engineering plans to the Engineering Division for review and approval through the Accela permitting portal. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer, to include but not be limited to the following:
14.Final Map. The applicant shall submit the final map with closure calculations, prior to City Council’s approval of each final map, improvement, or grading plans.
15.Improvement Plans. The improvement plans should include, but not be limited to, the following:
• Site Plan
• Grading and Drainage Plan
• Utilities Plan
• Landscaping and Irrigation Plan
• Joint Trench Plan
• Offsite Improvements Due to Project Impacts
16.Geotechnical Report. The applicant shall submit a current geotechnical report that supports the design features incorporated into this project including, but not limited to, grading activities, compaction requirements, utility construction, slopes, retaining walls, and roadway sections. The geotechnical report shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review prior to the approval of any civil plans and/or the issuance of an engineering permit.
121
17.Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD). In the event that a geologic hazard (potential slide or erosion hazards) is discovered during the course of grading activities or by other geological exploration, the applicant has the option to convey the affected area to the GHAD for continuous maintenance once the hazard has been mitigated. In addition, the applicant shall retain a geologic and / or engineering consultant to update the Plan of Control for the Southwest Pittsburg GHAD II.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES):
18.Permit Coverage under the State General Construction Permit.
The applicant shall submit a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the Construction general Permit, and a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate to the uses conducted on-site to effectively prohibit the entry of pollutants into storm water runoff. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan shall also include measures to prevent soil, dirt, and debris from entering the storm drain system, in accordance with California Stormwater Quality Association’s (CASQA’s) construction handbook.
Utilities
19.Capacity Evaluation.
The applicant shall provide on site storm, sewer, and water facilities analysis provide the results to the City to identify any service or supply problems. The cost for installation of facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the project shall be borne by the applicant.
20.Right of Way Irrigation System.
The applicant shall provide a Central Irrigation System that is compatible with Rainmaster DX 3 Evolution, with a remote controller included with the package.
The installation of this system shall be certified by a John Deere Landscapes United Greentech representative prior to the City’s acceptance of the installation.
21.Right of Way Landscape Design.
The applicant shall design the landscaping within the areas of public right-of-way in accordance with the provisions of Section 18.84.320 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code, and current City standard details.
22.Sewer Conveyance.
The applicant shall connect the sewer conveyance system through San Marco Villas apartments to the east.
23.Sump Area Drainage.
122
The applicant shall provide a safe release of drainage from sump areas, without conveying water over private property, allowing water to drain without damaging private or public improvements in the event of blockage of the storm drain system.
24.Fire Hydrants.
The applicant shall provide fire hydrant locations approved by Contra Costa County Fire Prevention District.
25.Water Sampling Station.
The applicant shall provide a water sampling station as required by the Public Works Department.
26.Utility Parcel Dedication. The applicant shall create and dedicate utility parcels to the City rather than utility easements between lots.
27.Water Use Calculations. The applicant shall provide estimated water use calculations to show compliance with the City’s water efficient landscape ordinance.
28.Frontage Improvements. The applicant shall provide frontage improvements for West Leland Road, Siena Village Drive, and Santa Teresa Drive. Note: Applicant has provided frontage improvements along West Leland and Santa Teresa Drive with curb, gutter and sidewalk.
Site Design Conditions:
29.Abutter’s Rights. The applicant shall relinquish the abutter’s rights for all corner lots.
30.Sidewalks. The applicant shall provide 6’ wide sidewalks throughout the subdivision.
31.Retaining Walls. The applicant shall construct retaining walls made from concrete block, gravity concrete, or similar material when walls are required between lots.
32.Bicycle Facility. The applicant shall provide for a Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive.
33.GHAD Access. The applicant shall provide maintenance access roads for areas to be dedicated to GHAD.
34.Soundwall Maintenance. Applicant shall establish a funding mechanism for the continuous maintenance of the soundwalls within the subdivision.
Engineering Exactions (CFD inclusion):
123
35.Annexation Documentation for CFD 2007-1. Community Facilities District 2007- 1 is for Park Maintenance. The rate of the CFD 2007-1 fee is subject to City Council Resolution No. 07-10698. The applicant shall deliver written approval in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer, that the owner of the parcel is electing to annex the subject property into the 2007-01 Park Maintenance Community Facilities District (CFD 2007-1), prior to the recordation of the first Final Map.
36.Annexation Documentation for CFD 2017-1. Community Facilities District 2017-1 is for fire facilities and fire safety and emergency services. The rate of the CFD 2017-1 fee is subject to City Council Resolution No. 17-13311. The applicant shall deliver written approval in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer, that the owner of the parcel is electing to annex the subject property into the 21017-1 Fire Facilities and Fire Safety and Emergency Services Community Facilities District (CFD 2017-1), prior to the issuance of any building or engineering permits.
Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
1. The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District has development impact fees established in the City of Pittsburg. Projects within the development impact areas will need to pay the fees prior to Building Permit issuance.
2. Access shall comply with Fire District requirements.
Provide emergency apparatus access roadways with all-weather (paved) driving surfaces of not less than 20-feet unobstructed width, and not less than 13 feet 6 inches of vertical clearance, to within 150 feet of travel distance to all portions of the exterior walls of every building. Access shall have a minimum outside turning radius of 45 feet, and must be capable of supporting the imposed fire apparatus loading of 37 tons. Access roadways shall not exceed 20% grade. Grades exceeding 16% shall be constructed of grooved concrete per the attached Fire District standard. (503) CFC
Aerial apparatus shall comply with Fire District requirements.
Aerial Fire Apparatus Access is required where the vertical distance between grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet as measured in accordance with Appendix D, Section 105 of the 2019 CFC. Aerial access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. At least one of the required routes shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located over the aerial fire apparatus access road or between the aerial fire apparatus road and building. 124
3. Access roadways of less than 28-feet unobstructed width shall have signs posted or curbs painted red with the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE clearly marked. (22500.1) CVC,
(503.3) CFC
Access roadways of 28 feet or greater, but less than 36-feet unobstructed width shall have NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signs posted, allowing for parking on one side only or curbs painted red with the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE clearly marked. (22500.1) CVC, (503.3) CFC
4. Turnarounds shall comply with Fire District requirements. See CCCFPD Ordinance 2019-37 for approved design.
5. Access gates for Fire District apparatus shall be a minimum of 20-feet wide.
Access gates shall slide horizontally or swing inward and shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from the street. Electrically operated gates shall be equipped with a Knox Company key-operated switch. Manually operated gates shall be equipped with a non-casehardened lock or approved Fire District lock. Contact the Fire District for information on ordering the key-operated switch. (D103.5) CFC.
6. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliable water supply for fire protection as set forth in the California Fire Code. (507.1) CFC
7. The developer shall provide hydrants of the East Bay type in compliance with Chapter 5
and Appendix B and C of the California Fire Code. (C103.1) CFC
8. Provide emergency escape and rescue openings in Group R occupancies of type V construction. Basements and sleeping rooms below the fourth story above grade plane shall have at least one exterior emergency escape and rescue opening. Such openings shall open directly into a public way or to a yard or court that opens to a public way. Landscaping, signage and other obstructions must not hinder the positioning of firefighting ground ladders from apparatus access to the rescue windows.
9. A land development permit is required for access and water supply review and approval prior to submitting building construction plans.
The developer shall submit a minimum of two (2) copies of full size, scaled site improvement plans indicating:
• All existing or proposed hydrant locations,
• Fire apparatus access,
• Aerial fire apparatus access,
• Elevations of building,
125
• Gates, fences, retaining walls, bio-retention basins, any obstructions to access.
• Size of building and type of construction,
• Striping and signage plan to include NO PARKING-FIRE LANE paint or signs
• Provide drawings for paths from the public way to under emergency escape and rescue openings showing a proposed clear path and clear space under these openings that allow for the placement of ground ladders at a climbing angle of 70 to 75 degrees and a
minimum of 18" clearance from the base of the ladder to any obstruction (see attached
ground ladder access standard) for review and approval prior to obtaining a building
permit.
This is a separate submittal from the building construction plans.
These plans shall be approved prior to submitting building plans for review. (501.3) CFC
10.Emergency apparatus access roadways and hydrants shall be installed, in service, and inspected by the Fire District prior to construction or combustible storage on site. (501.4) CFC
Note: A temporary aggregate base or asphalt grindings roadway is not considered an all-weather surface for emergency apparatus access. The first lift of asphalt concrete paving shall be installed as the minimum roadway material and must be engineered to support the designated gross vehicle weight of 37 tons.
11.The homes as proposed shall be protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system complying with the 2016 edition of NFPA 13D or Section R313.3 of the 2019 California Residential Code. Submit a minimum of two (2) sets of plans to this office for review and approval prior to installation. (903.2) CFC, (R313.3) CRC, Contra Costa County Ordinance 2019-37.
12.The developer shall provide traffic signal pre-emption systems (Opticom) on any new or modified traffic signals installed with this development. (21351) CVC
13.Flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks shall not be located on the site without obtaining approval and necessary permits from the Fire District. (3401.4) CFC
14.The owner shall cut down and remove all weeds, grass, vines, or other growth that is capable of being ignited and endangering property. (304.1.2) CFC 126
15.Where existing access to open land or space, or to fire trail systems maintained for public or private use is obstructed by new development of any kind, the developer shall provide an alternate means of access into the area that is sufficient to allow access for fire personnel and apparatus. These access roadways shall be a minimum of 16 feet in width to accommodate Fire District equipment. Access locations will be determined by this office upon submittal of three (3) copies of complete improvement plans.
16.Development on any parcel in this subdivision shall be subject to review and approval by the Fire District to ensure compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life safety. Submit three (3) sets of plans to the Fire District prior to obtaining a building permit. (501.3) CFC
17.The owner or the owner's authorized agent shall be responsible for the development, implementation, and maintenance of a written plan in compliance with NFPA 241, establishing a fire prevention program at the project site applicable throughout all phases of the construction. The plan shall be made available for review by the fire code official upon request. (Ch.33) CFC The fire prevention program superintendent shall develop and maintain an approved prefire plan in cooperation with the fire chief. The fire chief and fire code official shall be notified of changes affecting the utilization of information contained in such prefire plans. (Ch.33) CFC
18.The developer shall submit a minimum of two (2) complete sets of building construction plans and specifications for other than R-3 occupancies to the Fire District. After the new construction/ tenant improvement plans are approved, plans and specifications for all deferred submittals shall be submitted. A list of possible deferred submittals is below.
• Private underground fire service water mains
• Fire sprinklers
• Standpipe
• Fire alarm
• Fire pump
• Energy systems
• Emergency generator
• High-pile storage
• Photovoltaic
• Carbon Dioxide Systems
• Aboveground/underground flammable/combustible liquid storage tanks • Commercial kitchen hood extinguishing systems
• Spray booths
• Special suppression systems
• Emergency Responder Radio Coverage System (ERRCS)
127
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval prior to construction of the building or installation of the systems to ensure compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life safety. Plan review and inspection fees shall be submitted at the time of plan review submittal. (105.4.1) CFC, (901.2) CFC, (107) CBC
128
Exhibit D - Attachment 1 - Enhanced Rear Elevations
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 129
130
Exhibit D - Attachment 2 - Enhanced Side Elevations
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 131
132
Exhibit D - Attachment 3 - Window and Sound Walls
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 133
City of Pittsburg—Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum
FirstCarbon Solutions
Appendix G:
Applicable Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval Exhibit D - Attachment 4 - Appendix G Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 134
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
135
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval Applicable to the Modified Project Mitigation
Measure Description
Aesthetics, Light, and Glare
MM AES-1
(MM a(1))
Ridgeline Protection
Require that all project construction occur at elevations below the major ridgeline portion of the site; i.e., below approximately the 750-foot contour.
MM AES-2
(MM b(1))
Transmission Towers
As described in the Land Use section of this SEIR, the visual impacts of transmission lines on nearby residential and other important internal project vantage points could be reduced, although not to less than significant levels, by the strategic location of trees and other landscaping (see Section IV.A.3, Mitigation Measure a(5)).
MM AES-3
(MM b(2))
Interior Landscapes
The potential visual monotony and other undesirable visual characteristics of project streets with uniform home setbacks and building heights could be mitigated by the introduction of more variation in unit design, the inclusion of more single- story elements in project two-story homes, the introduction of more single-story homes at selected locations along each street, and introduction of unit designs which do not emphasize the garage door in the front elevation.
MM AES-4
(MM a(2))
General Design Controls
Incorporate in the final design and title provisions for the San Marco project measures and controls on architecture, grading, introduced landscaping, future tree removal, and ongoing landscape maintenance which are specifically formulated to reduce impacts on off-site vantage points. Emphasis should also be placed on the use of subdued appearing building materials and colors in order to minimize contrast with the surrounding hillside landscape.
MM AES-5
(MM a(3))
Design Controls for Custom Lots
For custom home lots, incorporate architectural design standards in the individual lot CC&Rs to ensure against the construction of visually conspicuous residential structures, particularly on the most visually vulnerable north-facing and ridgetop lots.
MM AES-6
(MM a(4))
Landscaping
Common and individual landscaping will have a substantial long-term effect in softening and reducing the visual impacts of the project. Given the importance of landscaping in reducing the visual impacts of the project, the following landscaping provisions should be included in the development program:
• Planting plans, specifications, and long-term maintenance responsibilities for the Modified Project street trees, park, and other common landscaping (see Figure 10) should be formulated and detailed to the satisfaction of the City. These plans and specifications should provide reasonable assurances for the long-term health and survival of these common project landscape features. • A program of ongoing maintenance and replacement of introduced landscaping should be established by the applicant to the satisfaction of the City. • Project CC&Rs should include landscaping standards for private exterior areas which will ensure the compatibility of each homesite with the surrounding San Marco neighborhood and will avoid increased adverse impacts on off-site vantage points. 136
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
MM AES-7
(MM c(1))
Views from Highway 4
Implementation of mitigations relating to increased tree planting; implementation of an effective landscaping and maintenance plan for Villages A, B, C, and M; and the requirement for use of subdued building materials and colors, and in particular, subdued roofing materials, would reduce project impacts on views from Highway 4.
• Because the multi-family structures in Villages B, C, and M are the most highly visible portion of the site from Highway 4, the opportunity to provide dense landscaping in the open space areas surrounding these clusters of multi-family buildings would be particularly important. • In addition, the southern portions of Shore Acres Creek (i.e., the segment south of the PG&E transmission lines) and its westernmost tributary should be preserved, incorporated into the project design, and enhanced with additional native vegetation, to provide additional visual interest from the freeway as well as from internal viewpoints.
MM AES-8
(MM c(2))
Views from the Sea Breeze. Mota Ranch and Shore Acres Subdivisions. Implementation of all of the mitigation measures listed under (a) above would reduce project impacts on views from these three communities. Because most of the views from these areas are intermediate and distant views of the upper elevations of the project. measures involving the preservation of the uppermost project ridgeline (i.e., the General Plan designated "major ridge" and Open Space area) would be a particularly important mitigation measure.
MM AES-9
(MM c (3))
Views from West Pittsburg. Implementation of all of the mitigation measures listed under “a” above would reduce project impacts on views from the West Pittsburg community. Similar to Shore Acres, because most of the views from the West Pittsburg area are distant views of the higher portions of the site, the preservation of the uppermost ridgeline (i.e., the designated “major ridge” and Open Space area) would be a particularly important mitigation measure.
MM AES-10
(MM c(4))
Views from Other Locations. Mitigations relating to use of subdued building materials and colors, subdued roofing materials, and common landscaping would also be effective in reducing project impacts on Evora Road and Avila Road-Leland Road views. Mitigations relating to increased overall landscaping; landscaping in Villages A, B, C, and M; and use of subdued roofing materials would be particularly important for reducing impacts on views from Evora Road.
MM AES-11
(MM a(5))
Light and Glare
The design of common project street lighting should incorporate use of low-intensity fixtures with the cone of light focused in a manner which avoids illuminating any nearby vertical surfaces.
• The CC&Rs for each individual lot should include stringent parameters regarding exterior lighting to ensure against nighttime visual impacts on off-site vantage points. The exterior lighting parameters should stipulate low mounting heights and, where the exterior fixture may be exposed to a surrounding vantage point or vantage points, use of appropriate light refractors or diffusers. • Any project pathway illumination should be limited to low bollard fixtures. In addition, any use of exterior lighting at other project facilities, such as the community park and recreation facilities, should be subject to the same design standards as those described above for individual project lots.
Air Quality
MM AQ-1
(MM a)
The severity of project construction period air pollutant emissions impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels through application of appropriate mitigation measures. In particular, dust control is required during all phases of construction to ensure that construction period impacts are mitigated. The Modified Project shall incorporate the following specific construction mitigation measures:
137
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
• Suspend earthmoving or other dust-producing activities during periods of high winds when dust control measures are unable to avoid visible dust plumes.
• Provide equipment and staffing for watering of all exposed or disturbed soil surfaces sufficient to suppress dust plumes, including weekends and holidays. An appropriate dust palliative or suppressant, added to water before application, should also be utilized. • Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by the wind. • Sweep construction area and adjacent streets of ail mud and debris, since this material can be pulverized and later resuspended by vehicle traffic. • Limit the speed of all construction vehicles to 15 miles per hour while on-site. • All materials transported by truck should be covered or wetted down as needed to suppress visible dust. • All excavated inactive portions of the site should be watered with an appropriate dust suppressant, covered or seeded.
MM AQ-2
(MM c(1))
Land Use and Density
Land uses and densities can be manipulated to orient development population concentrations toward pedestrian/bicycle travel for local trips and to provide easy access to BART. The Modified Project locates the highest density development along Leland Road, the most likely route for future local transit route connections to BART and/or downtown Pittsburg, and thus appropriately places a large portion of the site population within easy walking or bicycling distance to transit. However, project land uses are exclusively residential, requiring residents to drive for all services.
Placing one or more neighborhood commercial or convenience center within the project would be an effective way of reducing external trips and promoting bicycle/pedestrian modes of travel.
MM AQ-3
(MM c(2))
Transportation System
The Modified Project includes a trail system connecting residences with the proposed recreational area. This trail system should be expanded to provide a bikeway along Leland Road to promote bicycle use for trips to BART. Transit pull-outs should be provided along the Leland Road frontage of the project to accommodate future transit service. When such service becomes available, transit amenities, such as information kiosks and shelters, should be installed. Secure bicycle parking areas for apartment residents should also be provided if individual garages are not provided.
MM AQ-4
(MM c(3))
Fireplaces
Residential fireplaces are an air pollution source receiving increasing attention in recent years. Fireplace/woodstove restrictions have been adopted in a number of cities In California and the western United States, and it is likely that regional control of this source will be considered in the future.
The impact of residential fireplace emissions of PM-10 and carbon monoxide can be reduced by restricting the number of fireplaces in residences to one per household and/or requiring residential use of EPA-certified woodstoves or fireplace inserts. EPA-certified woodstoves or fireplace inserts are 70 to 90 percent effective in reducing emissions from this source.
Biological Resources
MM BIO-1
(MM a(1))
Complete appropriate revegetation and landscaping (emphasizing native trees, shrubs, and grasses) for heavily disturbed common areas. 138
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
Geology, Seismicity, and Soils
MM GEO-1
(MM e(1))
Analysis and Mitigation of Seismicity Prone Areas
As a condition of approval of the Tentative Map, a qualified geotechnical professional should analyze the susceptibility of the site to earthquake-induced land sliding, fill settlement due to dynamic forces, development of ground fissures, and potential for liquefaction. This analysis would require drilling test borings and conducting appropriate laboratory tests in area that could be so affected. Specifically, test borings and/or cone penetration tests should be completed where is anticipated that gills would be constructed over areas of deep, saturated alluvium that is susceptible to liquefaction; and on any unstable slopes that may affect the proposed development. Recommendations should be made to offset those earthquake-prone hazards. These recommendations could include avoidance or engineering solutions.
MM GEO-2
(MM e(2))
Fault Related Feature Analysis and Mitigation
In addition, a geotechnical professional should assess the possibility for the sympathetic displacements along the fault-related features on the project.
The evaluation should include radioisotopic dating of the surface soils or other chronostratigraphic techniques to evaluate the most recent episodes of movement along such features.
Based on the results of the fault-feature activity evaluation, a geotechnical professional should establish appropriate structural setbacks from zones of potential faulting on the sire.
MM GEO-3
(MM e(3))
Structure/Infrastructure Design
All project buildings, underground utilities and other improvements should be designed and constructed in accordance with all public agency requirements and City of Pittsburg building codes, particularly those sections of the codes regarding earthquake resistant design. The geotechnical report described above which would contain foundation recommendations for each lot should include earthquake design criteria in response to the site’s soil profile coefficient.
MM GEO-4
(MM c(1))
Slope Stability–General
In order to reduce potential impacts related to soil stability to less than significant levels, a qualified geotechnical professional should prepare a detailed map of unstable areas on the site, an analysis of each unstable area, and a detailed slope stabilization program.
Mapping Program. A detailed mapping program should be conducted by a qualified geotechnical professional to identify every instance of past landsliding, earthflows, slumps, debris flows, debris basins, and erosional gullies; and every occurrence of colluvial swales, soil creep, rock falls, and adversely oriented bedding on the site. Unstable and potentially unstable slopes impacting the proposed grading plan should be evaluated for depth and character of unstable materials. Test borings and/or exploration pits should be completed as part of evaluation.
Slope Stability Analysis. As part of the requirement for issuance of the Tentative Map, a series of slope stability analyses for critical cut slopes, fill slopes, and natural slopes, should be conducted by a qualified geotechnical professional to determine their stability under long-term static and short-term seismic loads. The analyses should incorporate saturated, residual shear strength parameters obtained from laboratory tests conducted on appropriate samples of earth materials recovered from the test borings and or exploration pits completed per mitigation measure suggested above. The impacts of the unstable conditions should be evaluated with respect to the proposed grading plan as a basis for determining the design, method of construction, extent and schedule of all stabilization measures.
139
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
Detailed Sloped Stabilization Plan. In response to the detailed mapping and analysis described above, a qualified geotechnical professional should prepare specific recommendations for stabilization of all unstable areas. The plan should include detailed recommendations for the setbacks of structures from the crest lines of creek banks, cut slopes, fill slopes and natural slopes.
The slope stabilization plan should also include the specific measures relating to grading listed below:
• A qualified geotechnical professional and the project civil engineer should be present to inspect all project grading. • The geotechnical professional should provide detailed recommendations of the setback of structures from specific on-site crest lines of creek banks, cut slopes, fill slopes, and natural slopes.
• The project civil engineer should ensure that all recommendations of the geotechnical are reflected in the grading plan and implemented by the developer.
• Specific recommendations of the geotechnical professional on cut slopes, fill slopes for lot grading, public street construction, infrastructure construction, and slope stabilization should be implemented. • A geotechnical professional should inspect all proposed cut-and-fill slopes to ensure that they would remain adequately stable and protected from significant erosion. Drainage Benches lines with Portland cement concrete or asphalt concrete should be installed if necessary to achieve necessary stability.
• As needed, a qualified geotechnical professional should modify and implement stabilization plans during construction. • All slope stabilization grading should be documented with as-built drawings and include as-built geologic map.
MM GEO-5
(MM c(2))
Land sliding
The slope stabilization plan described above should pay particular attention to landslide areas. Based on the detailed mapping and stability analysis described above, the geotechnical professional should provide specific recommendations for stabilization of all landslides, potential landslides, and all off-site landslides that may impact on-site development. This work should include preparation of a detailed geologic map and performance of a subsurface investigation within each area with a high potential for future slope movement.
A detailed construction plan should be prepared to stabilize landslides, potential landslide areas (including debris flows and rock fall areas), and off-site landslides. This plan should include detailed sections and plans showing limits of work and detailed grading specifications for performance of the stabilization work. Implementation of the plan should be completed before the sale of individual project lots.
MM GEO-6
(MM c(3))
Soil Creep
Using the detailed mapping and stability analysis described above, the geotechnical professionals should provide specific recommendations to reduce damage to structures and infrastructure cause by slope creep should be provided, including recommendations for setbacks from the slopes subject to slope creep
MM GEO-7
(MM b(1))
Expansive Earth Materials
Implementation of the following measure would reduce identified project impacts related to expansive earth materials to less than significant levels.
Grading/Foundation Design. A standard soils test geotechnical investigation should be performed by a qualified geotechnical professional on each lot after subdivision grading is completed and prior to issuing building permits. The geotechnical professional should evaluate the expansion potential of native materials and fill on each lot and evaluate the subsurface conditions observed during grading. A report should be issued for each lot or group of lots with similar subsurface conditions along with recommendations for selective lot grading and foundation design and construction. The geotechnical 140
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
professional should provide foundation design, soil preparation and selective grading recommendations which are appropriate for the on-site soil and geologic conditions observed after mass grading has been completed.
A geotechnical professional should prepare specific recommendations for the modification of the presently proposed post-tensioned slab-on-grade foundation system to counteract soil swelling and shrinkage and for the treatment of expansive soils in all pavement and flatwork areas to ensure that the effects of soil expansion are minimized.
Drainage Plan. To avoid impact of expansive earth materials due to improper surface drainage design, a registered civil engineer should design a surface drainage system for each lot. The drainage system should be compatible with the subdivision’s drainage system. The drainage system for each lot should include the following provisions:
• Portland cement concrete or asphalt concrete lined “V” ditches should be installed at the bases of all slopes greater than 15 feet high and adjacent to building pads. The ditches should drain to a suitable outlet. • All building pads should be rough graded with a two percent slope toward the streets. • The surface next to the house and associated structures should be graded with a slope of at least two percent away from the structure for a minimum distance of four feet.
• The lot should be drained with swales which slope two percent and discharge to a suitable outlet. • All roof downspouts should be connected to a solid pipe collector system which discharges to a suitable outlet. • The crawl space of each house of unit should be connected to a solid pipe collector system which discharges at a suitable outlet. • Landscaping and walks should be installed such that the lot drainage system designed by the civil engineer is not disrupted. Water should not be allowed to pond on any lot.
Conditions, covenants and restrictions for the subdivision should include the lot drainage requirements listed above. Specific reference to drainage requirements should also be included in the deed for each lot in order to prevent homeowners from altering drainage on the lot.
The recommendations and plans related to drainage provided by the geotechnical professional and project civil engineer should be carried out completely and correctly by the developer’s contractors. The geotechnical consultant and civil engineer should provide continuous inspection during construction in order to ensure that their recommendation and plans are properly implemented.
Hydrology and Water Quality
MM HYD-1
(MM b(1))
Erosion Control
The project grading plan should include an approved drainage and erosion control plan to minimize impacts from erosion and sedimentation during grading. This drainage and erosion control plan should conform to all standards adopted by Contra Costa County and those measures outlined in Section IV.D.3 of this SEIR (Soils and Geology). The plan should include such erosion control procedures as:
• Restricting grading to the dry season;
• Protecting all finished graded slopes from erosion using such techniques as hillslope benching, erosion control matting, and hydroseeding; • Protecting downstream storm drainage inlets from sedimentation; • Use of silt fencing to retain sediment on the project site; and • Any other suitable measures outlined in the Association of Bay Area Governments’ (ABAG) Manual of Standard or Contra Costa County regulations. 141
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
MM HYD-2
(MM b(2))
Drainage System Inspection
After construction is completed, all drainage culverts should be inspected for accumulated sediment. If sediment accumulation has occurred, these drainage structures should be cleared of debris and sediment.
MM HYD-3
(MM c)
Water Quality Impacts
To mitigate potential water quality impacts to less than significant levels, the project applicant should apply for and obtain the necessary NPDES stormwater discharge permit (which applies to the grading of five or more acres of land) from the California Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). This RWQCB permit requirement is relatively new. It is expected that the program for administering such permits will begin in October 1992.
Though a specific regulatory program has not been instituted, development of the size will be required to address non-point source pollutants from sheet runoff, not just construction-related impacts. The Regional Board is currently developing guidelines identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) for reducing non-point source pollutants. These practices vary, but generally include increased street cleaning, oil and grease separators for large parking areas, infiltration areas, and trash racks. Through these procedures and facilities are not currently required, they are expected to be required in the near future. If not incorporated into the drainage system design for the project, future regulations would possibly mandate costly retro-fitting of the storm drain system. The applicant should either:
• Incorporated some of these facilities into the subdivision storm drainage design, • Design the retention and other drainage facilities in a way which will easily facilitate the future installation of non-point source pollutant control devices, and/or
• Set aside funds to comply with future regulatory requirements.
The RWQCB must also certify any Section 404 permit issued by the Army Corps of Engineers. This certification should be based on a RWQCB determination that the Section 404 permitted construction activity would comply with RWQCB water quality standards.
MM HYD-4
(MM a)
Peak Runoff and Volume
The project-related increase in peak runoff volume would be adequately mitigated by the creation of on-site detention basins (approved by the CCCFCWCD) as described in the impact section. The CCCFCWCD has approved the design of the detention basins as described in the impact section.
Therefore, it appears that this impact would be mitigated to less that significant levels by the virtue of the Modified Project design. No additional mitigation measures would be necessary.
City staff has indicated that prior to Final Map approval, a hydrology report describing this system must be submitted to all affected agencies. The analysis must be presented with a complete set of hydraulic calculations and determination of peak stormwater discharge beneath the freeway. The analysis must show the capacity of the proposed retention basin and the recommendations of the CCCFCWCD. 142
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
Noise
MM NOI-1
(MM a(1))
Outdoor Noise Levels
Providing for noise levels that are consistent with the goals of the City of Pittsburg General Plan throughout the proposed development would require mitigation. Various combinations of noise abatement methods could be used to mitigate projected on-site noise levels. These could include the construction of berms of soundwalls, and redesign of the site plan to increase distance from the proposed homes to the adjacent noise source. Since one of the goals of the City of Pittsburg General Plan is to avoid the use of visible soundwalls, the required heights of both berms and soundwalls necessary to mitigate projected on-site noise levels have been calculated. Berms are generally more effective sound barriers than walls due to the increased acoustical effectiveness provided by the shape and content of a berm. • Highway 4. An eight-foot berm at the top of the slope along the elevated Highway 4 cross section as shown on Figure 43 would mitigate the projected noise intrusion into the project to levels below an Ldn of 60 dB. Alternatively, an 11-foot high soundwall could be constructed in the same location to achieve equivalent noise mitigation. Either of these two measures, or a combination of the two, would reduce noise impacts along Highway 4 to less than significant levels.
• Willow Pass Road Extension. Mitigating noise exposure alone the extension of Willow Pass Road would require the use of a soundwall because the proposed site plan does not provide enough room for a berm. A wall seven-feet high on both sides of the Willow Pass Road Extension (Project Street A) would reduce the noise exposure for both the single-family homes on the east side and the multi-family homes on the west side to less than 60 dB.
Because the multi-family homes would be located 10 to 15 feet below the road, the wall at this location would also reduce noise levels outside of the upper floors. Alternatively, the project would be redesigned to allow for a more visually acceptable berm along this route, rather than a noise wall. • Leland Road. The highest noise outside of a building along Leland Road west of the Willow Pass Road extension would be an Ldn of 62 dB. It is probable that such noise levels would be adequately attenuated on individual decks and patios by construction of local or individual fences with noiseabating specifications. Noise levels along Leland Road east of the Willow Pass extension, on the other hand, would be quite high, particularly outside of the single-family homes on the north side of the road in proposed Village A. A sound wall nine-feet high would be necessary to reduce noise levels in the yards of these homes to an Ldn less than 60 dB. The exterior noise levels for multi-family homes on the south side of Leland Road in this area would reach an Ldn of 65 dB. Because there are multi-family homes and because the primary outdoor use areas would be in the center of the development, it is anticipated that mitigation would take place for localized patios in the form of fences.
The berms and walls recommended above provide a conceptual indication regarding the type of mitigation that would be required to make the project compatible with the noise environment and to reduce project noise-related impacts to less than significant levels. Precise locations and heights of berms, walls and fences would need to be determined at the project development stage.
MM NOI-2
(MM a(2))
Indoor Noise Levels
The berms or walls would reduce noise levels outside of the first floors to below an Ldn of 60dB. This means that noise levels inside the first floor of homes in the area would be below and Ldn of 45 dB, even with first-floor windows open for ventilation. Second stories, however, could be exposed to noise levels in excess of 60 dB. In these cases, ventilation must be provided so that residents could keep the windows closed to meet the indoor noise standard. Additionally, in some cases, exterior noise levels may be severe enough to require the use of sound-rated glazing in upper floor windows. 143
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
MM NOI-3
(MM c(2))
Construction Noise Impacts–On-site
To minimize the impact of project construction noise on new project residents, construction should be limited to daytime hours on weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. All equipment used in the project should be adequately muffled and maintained.
Public Services
MM PUB-1
(MM c(1))
Response Time Impacts
A new fire station must be constructed at a location to be established in consultation with the District which will meet the District’s response time standard. This location may be on the project site or elsewhere within the response time standard. The project’s contribution toward the construction of this fire station would be collected via the Fire Facilities Element Fees and those additional charges described below as determined in consultation with the RFPD.
In addition, the joining of Avila Road and Leland Road routes, should be clearly marked, with these markings placed in a location clearly visible to motorists.
MM PUB-2
(MM c(2))
Personnel and Equipment Impacts
As a condition of approval, the project should be required to provide, to the satisfaction of the RFPD, its fair share of those local fire capital improvement and operating expenses which would not be adequately covered by Fire Facilities Element Fees or Benefit Assessment Fees from the project. No project homes should be occupied until adequate fire protection and suppression services are in place to the satisfaction of the District.
MM PUB-3
(MM c(3))
Additional Measures
The Fire District has also recommended the following additional specific provisions to ensure adequate fire protection and fire suppression services for the project:
• Water storage and pressure should be provided for the project as required by the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Appendix Chapter III; • Fire sprinkler protection should be provided in all project structures, including single-family homes; • Fire-retardant roofing should be required for all project structures, including single-family homes; and • Adequate emergency vehicle access should be provided to all project homes, as required by the UFC and the Fire District.
MM PUB-4
(MM (c))
According to the Police Department, the creation of a new separate beat is warranted to accommodate the response time needs of the project and anticipated cumulative residential development in the southwest area to less than significant levels. The present four-beat structure is currently undergoing re-evaluation. However, this evaluation is more likely to result in the realignment of current beat boundaries, rather than the creation of additional beats. The Police Department anticipates that the creation of a new, fully staffed, separate southwest area beat would reduce project and cumulative impacts on police response time and citywide service levels to less than significant levels. New staffing should be funded by revenue flow increases to the City’s General Fund due to anticipated cumulative southwest area growth.
Several additional project measures have also been recommended by the Police Department to improve crime prevention and further reduce project impacts on the provision of police service These measures include: (1) provision of adequate, well lighted, accessible and non-isolated parking areas and visible entries for all multi-family structures; (2) provision of streets which are consistent with existing standards and do not vary in width; and (3) avoidance of developed open space (I.e., parks) which abut side and rear yards of residential dwellings. 144
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
MM PUB-5
(MM (c))
Assuming little change in current local school capacity conditions between now and project buildout (I.e., no new school construction), the project alone would result in over-enrollment at all elementary and middle schools in the District attended by project residents. Project adverse impacts on school enrollment would be partially mitigated through the existing impact fee requirements ($0.75 per residential square foot). According to the District, application of the current impact fee is expected to have minimal effect in covering the full cost of the school expansion needs generated by the project and by cumulative residential growth in the area.
To mitigate the project contribution to the cumulative impact on school enrollment, approval of the project should be conditioned upon project commitment to fair share participation in a future added capital facilities program to be established Mount Diablo Unified School District.
Project participation in the added capital facilities program should include the following:
• Payment of existing school impact fees;
• Payment of additional school impact fees established by the School District after the expiration of the existing fee agreement in 1994 so long as these additional fees are within State-mandated limits and have been adequately justified; and • Establishment of a Mello-Roos District for the project to fund the project’s fair share of the cost of necessary school improvements which are not covered by the fee programs described above.
The applicant’s participation in the above listed mitigation requirements could be reduced to an extend mutually agreed upon by the City, the school district, and the applicant, in exchange for project participation in direct financing or construction of a new elementary school on the site.
MM PUB-6
(MM (1))
Service Area Population
A project contribution of additional library facilities equivalent to the increase demand generated by the project would reduce project impacts to an insignificant level. This project contribution could include funding for additional books and additional library space to meet the accepted standard described under measures (2) and (3) below.
Alternately, the provision of service facilities which could directly serve the project-generated population, such as a bookmobile, may also be considered.
MM PUB-7
(MM c(2))
Square feet of Library Space Per Capita Ratio
With the project expected to ultimately add approximately 7,730 residents to the library service areas, project contribution of a fee adequate to construct 3,865 square feet of added library space in the form of an addition to an existing branch or a new library branch prior to project buildout would meet the standard of 0.5 square feet per capita. This action would reduce the impact of the project on County library space needs to a less than significant level.
MM PUB-8
(MM (3))
Books Per Capita Ratio
With the project expected to generate 7,730 residents, a project contribution of a total of 15,460 volumes of books to build a new library branch of 7,730 volumes to each branch would meet the library’s goal of two volumes of books per capita. This action would reduce the impact of the project on County library book needs to a less than significant level.
Utilities and Service Systems
MM UTIL-1
(MM (c))
Implementation of the following measures would reduce project-related impacts on water service to less than significant levels:
145
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
• The project should be responsible for construction of all improvements listed on page 4 of the City’s Water Master Plan Update. The preliminary anticipated total cost of these improvements in 1990 dollars is $7,290,000. All final water system design specifications and constructed improvements would be subject to the approval of the City of Pittsburg. These specifications shall include adequate provisions for maintenance access to these facilities.
• The project should pay its fair share of the cost of recent water treatment plant expansion and raw water storage facilities. • The overall project landscape plan which is described on page 73 of this SEIR should be revised and refined to include drought-tolerant plant species whenever possible. Future subarea landscape plans and guidelines for Villages A, C, D, and M should include similar provisions.
MM UTIL-2
(MM 3)
In order to adequately address project-related impacts on the local sewage collection and treatment system, the project would be required to pay the sewer development fees for DDSD Zone 1 as per the DDSD Schedule of Fees identified in the WPSMU.
Applicant completion of a sewer capacity study would also be necessary to determine the size of the project sewer extension lines and the points of connection to the DDSD main facilities.
Condition of
Approval Description
Biological Resources
COA BIO-1 If construction, grading, vegetation removal, or other project-related activities are scheduled during the nesting season, February 1 to August 31, a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist within 7 days prior to the beginning of project-related activities. The survey shall consist of the entire project limits, as well as a minimum 500-foot buffer. If a lapse in project-related work of 7 days or longer occurs, another focused survey shall be required before project work can be reinitiated. If an active nest is found during surveys, qualified Biologist shall establish siteand species-specific no-work buffers. The buffer distances shall be specified to protect the bird’s normal behavior to prevent nesting failure or abandonment. The buffer distance recommendation shall be developed after field investigations that evaluate the bird(s) apparent distress in the presence of people or equipment at various distances. Abnormal nesting behaviors which may cause reproductive harm include, but are not limited to, defensive flights/vocalizations directed toward project personnel, standing up from a brooding position, and flying away from the nest. The qualified Biologist shall have authority to order the cessation of all nearby project activities if the nesting birds exhibit abnormal behavior which may cause reproductive failure (nest abandonment and loss of eggs and/or young) until an appropriate buffer is established.
The qualified Biologist shall monitor the behavior of the birds (adults and young, when present) at the nest site to ensure that they are not disturbed by project work. Nest monitoring shall continue during project work until the young have fully fledged (have completely left the nest site and are no longer being fed by the parents), as determined by the qualified Biologist, unless otherwise approved in writing by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).
COA BIO-2 Pre-construction surveys for nesting burrowing owls within 250 feet of the site prior to commencement of construction activities between February 1 through August 31 are recommended. If occupied burrows are found, a qualified Biologist should determine the need (if any) for temporal restrictions on construction. The determination should be pursuant to criteria set forth by CDFW (CDFG, 2012). 146
City of Pittsburg–Siena at San Marco Project
Addendum Appendix G
FirstCarbon Solutions
Mitigation
Measure Description
Cultural Resources
COA CUL-1 If buried cultural resources are discovered during construction, operations shall stop in the immediate vicinity of the find and a qualified Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the Lead Agency on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of, but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project area should be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria.
If the resources are determined to be unique historic resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the Archaeological Monitor and recommended to the Lead Agency. Appropriate mitigation measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.
No further grading shall occur in the area of the discovery until the Lead Agency approves the measures to protect these resources. Any archaeological artifacts recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution approved by the Lead Agency where they would be afforded long-term preservation to allow future scientific study.
COA CUL-2 In the event of an inadvertent discovery or recognition of any human remains, Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 must be followed. In this instance, once project-related earthmoving begins and if there is inadvertent discovery or recognition of any human remains, the following steps shall be taken:
1. There shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains until the County Coroner is contacted to determine whether the remains are Native American and if an investigation of the cause of death is required. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Coroner shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, and the NAHC shall identify the person or persons it believes to be the “most likely descendant” of the deceased Native American. The Most Likely Descendant (MLD) may make recommendations to the landowner or the person responsible for the excavation work, for means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains, and any associated grave goods as provided in Public Resources Section 5097.98, or
2. Where the following conditions occur, the landowner or his/her authorized representative shall rebury the Native American human remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity either in accordance with the recommendations of the MLD or on the project site in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance:
• The NAHC is unable to identify a MLD or the MLD failed to make a recommendation within 48 hours after being notified by the commission. • The descendant identified fails to make a recommendation. • The landowner or his authorized representative rejects the recommendation of the descendant, and the mediation by the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner.
147
Ordinance No. 23- Page 1 of 6 November 20, 2023
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Amending the San Marco Development )
Plan and PD-1362 (Planned )
Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) )
District for “Siena at San Marco ) ORDINANCE NO. 23-
Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and )
17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, )
DR).” )
WHEREAS, on April 3, 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 90-990 certifying a negative declaration and authorizing the execution of the Southwest Development Agreement (DA) for the development of 2,938 residential units on 639 acres in the southwest hills of Pittsburg. The DA established provisions under which the development would be built, including land use regulations, fees and assessments, and infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-7888 certifying a subsequent environmental impact report (SEIR) for the 2,938-unit project currently known as the San Marco Development; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 93-1057 zoning the San Marco Development property to a residential Planned Development District (PD-1057), with a PD Plan consisting of 1,412 single-family residential units and 1,526 multifamily residential units; and
WHEREAS, there have been four subsequent amendments to the DA since the original approval on January 19, 1993. On October 1, 2001, the Council approved Ordinance No. 01-1187, the first amendment to the DA to extend the term of the agreement to the year 2020. Initial construction of residential units in San Marco began in 2001. On July 19, 2010, the Council approved Ordinance No. 10-1326, the second amendment to the DA, which revised the map exhibit of the DA to remove 1.41 acres that the developer wanted for a commercial gasoline station, rather than a residential use. On April 15, 2013, the Council approved Ordinance No. 13-1369, the third amendment to the DA, to extend the term of the agreement to the year 2032, among other items, including park improvements and annual payments for DA compliance reviews. On December 21, 2020, the Council approved Ordinance No. 20-1481, the fourth amendment to the DA, which allowed a General Plan Map Amendment and amendments to the Planned Development District and San Marco Development Plan for the San Marco Commercial Center project; and
WHEREAS, there have been four subsequent amendments to the original PD Ordinance since it was adopted on February 1, 1993. On February 3, 2003, the Council approved Ordinance No. 03-1204, a City-initiated amendment increasing lot coverage allowances for single-family homes in this and other PD Districts from 40 to 55 percent, depending on lot size. On August 21, 2006, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 06-1270, an applicant-initiated amendment to San Marco Development Park Requirements, 148
Ordinance No. 23- Page 2 of 6 November 20, 2023
consolidating several mini-parks in the original development plan into two larger community parks, consistent with the City of Pittsburg 2001 General Plan. On October 15, 2012, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 12-1362 to exchange development density (176 units) within the San Marco Development from townhouse/multifamily Village O to singlefamily Village A. On December 21, 2020, the Council approved Ordinance No. 20-1480, amending the San Marco PD District and Development Plan to allow for a small commercial shopping center (San Marco Commercial Center) on the 3.69-acre property on the southeast corner of San Marco Boulevard and W. Leland Road. The San Marco Commercial Center project consists of a 29,822-square-foot anchor tenant building and two separate commercial pad sites. The anchor tenant building is designed to accommodate a grocery store or retail use. One of the commercial pads is designed to accommodate an 1,826-square-foot restaurant with drive-through service and the second pad could accommodate a 3,500-square-foot restaurant. To date, approximately 1,540 single-family houses, 462 multi-family units (San Marco Villas 1 and 2 (Village B)), a public elementary school and an adjoining neighborhood park and a community park have been built in the San Marco Development; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2021, Discovery Builders, Inc., filed Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR), requesting: 1) an Amendment to the General Plan Map to change the land use designation of the project site from High Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to single-family units, 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision (Siena at San Marco); to subdivide the project site into 206 individual lots for single-family residences, and 4) Design Review of landscape and architectural plans to construct residences at Siena at San Marco. The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located within the larger San Marco Development area which is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement (DA) originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, as subsequently amended. The project site is regulated by the conditions of approval set forth in the PD-1362 (Planned Development District, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and
WHEREAS, a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified in accordance with CEQA to examine the potential environmental effects of the original project (Final EIR for the San Marco Subdivision). The Pittsburg City Council certified the Final SEIR in Resolution No. 93-7888 on January 19, 1993, making the required findings under CEQA (State Clearinghouse No. 91073029). An Addendum to the certified Final SEIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 to address the proposed project (Siena at San Marco Units 16 and 17). The Addendum must be considered by the City Council with Planning Application No. AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR); and
149
Ordinance No. 23- Page 3 of 6 November 20, 2023
WHEREAS, Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) sections 18.16.020 and 18.62.070 identify the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on proposed changes to PD Districts of the zoning map, and requires that the Commission conduct a public hearing and determine, prior to making its recommendation, that: 1) the change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan; 2) a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and 3) its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10226, recommending approval of the proposal in its entirety, including the requested amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to Friday, November 10, 2023, in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A - D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the November 20, 2023, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times; was posted at City Hall; was delivered for posting at the Pittsburg Library; and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, to the property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice; and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2023, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing to: 1) introduce and waive further reading of this ordinance approving the proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and 2) adopt a resolution approving the proposed General Plan Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map and Design Review, at which time oral and/or written testimony was considered.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pittsburg does ORDAIN as follows:
SECTION 1. Findings.
A. The City Council finds that each fact set forth in the preceding recitals is true and correct and incorporated by reference.
B. Based on the City Council Staff Report entitled, “Adoption of a Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR),” dated November 20, 2023, and based on all the information contained in the Planning Division files on the project, incorporated herein by reference and available for review in the Planning Division located at 65 Civic Avenue in Pittsburg, 150
Ordinance No. 23- Page 4 of 6 November 20, 2023
and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the public hearing, the City Council finds that:
1. City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the San Marco Development area remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional documentation may be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.). Based on the analysis in the Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an Addendum provides the required documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District:
2. Pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.62.070, amendments to adopted PD Districts are processed in the same manner as zoning map amendments.
3. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD1362 District is subject to the San Marco DA originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, which was found to be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the 1988 General Plan.
4. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD1362 District is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is prepared, in that the land uses and property development regulations allowed in the proposed ‘PD District’ will be similar to the land uses and property development regulations that were approved for other residential subdivisions in the San Marco Development area, i.e., Toscana (Village A), Positano (Village D – Units 11 and 12) and Capri (Village E – Unit 13) subdivisions:
Max. Lot Coverage: 55 percent
Min. Front Yard: 15 ft. to nearest wall
10 ft. to porch
18 ft. to garage
Min. Corner Side Yard: 8 ft.
Min. Side Yard: 4 ft.
Min. Rear Yard: 5 ft.
5. There is a community need for the proposed change to the amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District. Currently, the entire San Marco Development area is designated exclusively for residential use in the approved PD Plan. The proposed amendment would not increase the total number of units already envisioned for the San Marco Development but would increase the number of small-lot, single-family units in the project, 151
Ordinance No. 23- Page 5 of 6 November 20, 2023
thereby increasing opportunities for homeownership for entry-level buyers in the community.
6. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD1362 District will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, in that it would not increase the total number of units already envisioned for the San Marco Development and would provide well-designed, new homes for existing and new residents near the San Marco Commercial Center and the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station.
SECTION 2. Amendment.
Based on the findings and the authority set forth above, the City Council hereby amends the Zoning Map, as referenced in Pittsburg Municipal Code, Title 18 (Zoning Ordinance) section 18.04.020, to amend PD-1362 District and the corresponding San Marco Development Plan Land Use Table to: 1) reflect a reassignment of 98 units from multifamily Village M, nine (9) units from multifamily Village B, and five (5) units from multifamily Village O to single family Village C, and 2) convert 25 units from multifamily Village O to single family units in Village O as depicted in Exhibit A of this resolution.
SECTION 3. Effective Date.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4. Severability.
If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.
SECTION 5. Publication.
The ordinance shall be posted and published in accordance with California Government Code.
152
Ordinance No. 23- Page 6 of 6 November 20, 2023
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Pittsburg held on November 20, 2023, and was adopted and ordered published at a meeting of the City Council held on ____________, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
153
1 2 4 3 5 (C) 3 5 (B) 4 9 (D) 10(D) (B) 6 7(B) 8(A) (B) RECREATION CENTER (D) 2 (D) 3(B) 1 Exhibit A - Amendment to San Marco Development Plan and PD Plan, Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 154
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP,
PD/RZ, SUBD, DR)
Specific development regulations for Siena at San Marco (Units 16 and 17) are as follows:
Max. Lot Coverage: 55 percent
Min. Front Yard: 15 ft. to nearest wall
10 ft. to porch
18 ft. to garage
Min. Corner Side Yard: 8 ft.
Min. Side Yard: 4 ft.
Min. Rear Yard: 5 ft.
The proposed development regulations in the PD Plan (listed above) are similar to the standards that were approved for the Toscana (Village A), Positano (Village D – Units 11 and 12) and Capri (Village E – Unit 13) subdivisions.
155
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG In the Matter of:
Recommending City Council Approval of a
General Plan Map Amendment,
Amendment to San Marco Development
Plan and PD-1362 District, Vesting
Tentative Map for Major Subdivision, and
Design Review for 206-Unit, Single-Family
Residential Subdivision Located
Immediately South of the Willow Pass
Road Interchange on State Route 4 for
“Siena at San Marco Residential
Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ,
SUBD, DR).”
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Resolution No. 10226
The Planning Commission DOES RESOLVE as follows:
Section 1. Background
A. On July 21, 2021, Louis Parsons of Discovery Builders, Inc., filed Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR), requesting a change to the Development Plan for San Marco to transfer the unit count between villages within the San Marco Development area to allow for construction of a 206-lot subdivision (Siena at San Marco). Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071.
B. The proposed project is governed by the applicable goals and policies of the Pittsburg General Plan (General Plan) and the Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC).
C. Pursuant to PMC section 17.16.100, an applicant may request that two or more applications for separate discretionary approvals, including zoning amendments under PMC Title 18, requested or required in conjunction with a project be consolidated.
D. Under Government Code section 65358, the legislative body of a local government agency may amend its General Plan, in whole or in part, if it finds that the amendment would be in the public interest. No more than four General Plan amendments to each required element may be adopted within one calendar year. In this calendar year so far, the City Council has not adopted any amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element.
E. The California Government Code and PMC identify the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on amendments to the General Plan.
Government Code section 65353(a) requires that the Planning Commission Attachment 3
156
conduct at least one public hearing prior to making its recommendation on a proposed General Plan amendment.
F. PMC section 18.16.020 identifies the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on proposed zoning changes, and requires that the Planning Commission determine, prior to making its recommendation, that:
1. the change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan;
2. in the case of a base district, overlay district or general land use regulation, the change proposed is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is proposed;
3. a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and
4. its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice.
G. PMC section 17.12.010 identifies the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on proposed tentative maps when consolidated with one or more applications for other approvals which are subject to final approval by the City Council. In order to recommend City Council approval of a Vesting Tentative Map, the Planning Commission must determine, in accordance with PMC section
17.20.060(c), that:
1. the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provision of PMC;
2. the site is physically suitable for the type of development;
3. the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development;
4. the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
5. the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems; and
6. the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
157
H. Pursuant to PMC section 18.36.230, the Planning Commission shall discuss the application for Design Review approval and integrate it with the land use approval process applicable to the project. In order to recommend Design Review approval (pursuant to the direction of PMC section 18.36.230), the Planning Commission must determine, in accordance with PMC section
18.36.220.B, that:
1. the structure conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality;
2. the structure will be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors that may tend to make the environment less desirable;
3. the exterior design and appearance of the structure is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value;
4. the structure is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area; and
5. the application conforms with the criteria set forth in any applicable City adopted design guidelines.
I. On January 19, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-7888 certifying a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the entire, 639-acre, 2,938-unit project currently known as the San Marco Development (State Clearinghouse No. 91073029).
J. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) provides that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declaration (ND) if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a Subsequent EIR or ND have occurred.
K. City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the SEIR for the San Marco Subdivision remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional documentation may be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.).
L. Based on the analysis in the Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an Addendum provides the required documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
M. On Saturday, June 17, 2023, in accordance with Government Code sections 158
65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A, B and D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the June 27, 2023, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times.
N. On Friday, June 16, 2023, a “Notice of Public Hearing” was posted at City Hall and at or near the project site; was delivered for posting at the Pittsburg Library; was posted on the “Public Notices” section of the City’s website and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, to the property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice. In addition, a copy of the notice was posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”) and was sent directly to all subscribed residents in the “Avila,” “San Marco” and “San Marco Villas” neighborhoods.
O. On June 27, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR), at which time additional oral and/or written testimony was considered.
Section 2. Findings
A. Based on the Planning Commission staff report entitled, “Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR),” dated June 27, 2023, and based on all the information contained in the Planning Division files on the project, incorporated herein by reference and available for review in the Planning Division located at 65 Civic Avenue in Pittsburg, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the public hearing, the Planning Commission finds that:
1. All recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
2. City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the San Marco Development area remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional documentation may be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.).
Based on the analysis in the Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an Addendum provides the required documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
General Plan:
3. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD159
1362 District is subject to the San Marco DA originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, which was found to be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the 1988 General Plan. Though the proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District is not subject to the 2020 General Plan, it is consistent with many of the goals and policies contained within the current document, and is therefore in the public interest, in that:
a. The proposed project will provide low-density, single-family residential in the Southwest Hills subarea (Goal 2-G-4). b. The proposed project will provide a dog park as a community amenity (Policy 2-P-6).
c. The proposed project will utilize a Planned Development (PD) zoning to achieve a high-quality design outcome (Policy 2-P-5). d. The proposed project will pay its share of the costs for the construction of facilities needed to serve the development (Policy 3- P-1, 3-P-13, and 7-P-2). The proposed project will comply with conditions of approval requiring payment of the Facilities Reserve Charge, Local Traffic Mitigation Fee (LTMF), and Regional Transportation Development Impact Mitigation Fee (RT-DIM) in accordance with the Pittsburg Municipal Code. The proposed project will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare in that it requires the Developer to pay fees to finance unmet local and regional traffic improvement needs and annex the site into the City’s Community Facilities District (CFD) 2007-1 for park maintenance and the City’s CFD 2017-1 for fire facilities and fire safety and emergency services.
e. The proposed project will be built in an area where public facilities and infrastructure are already available (Policy 3-P-1). A condition of approval will require the applicant to evaluate the existing, receiving storm and sewer facilities for adequate capacity and provide the results to the city to identify any service or supply problems. If any service or supply problems arise, the applicant agrees to cover the cost for installation of additional facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the proposed project. f. The existing transportation system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed project (Policy 3-P-2). Residents of the proposed project will have multiple transportation options available to them as the site is located near BART, Tri-Delta Transit, and bicycle lanes.
160
g. The proposed project will provide safe and contiguous routes for pedestrians and bicyclists (Policy 3-P-17, 7-P-34, and 7-P-40) in that a Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive is required as part of this project. h. The proposed project will include bicycle racks in each garage for secure bicycle parking (Policy 7-P-45).
i. The Developer will equitably share the costs associated with providing water and wastewater services to the proposed project through payment of the Pittsburg Facilities Reserve Charge (Policy 11-P-7 and 11-P-18).
j. The proposed project will include window assembly upgrades for upper-floor windows of Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dB CNEL. The proposed project will also include sound walls for Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 and West Leland Road to ensure exterior noise levels do not exceed 65 dB CNEL (Policy 12- P-6).
k. The proposed project will comply with conditions of approval requiring construction of quality home designs to ensure future residents will enjoy an attractive living environment (Housing Goal G-5 and Policy P-5.1).
Zoning Map:
4. Pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.62.070, amendments to adopted PD Districts are processed in the same manner as zoning map amendments.
5. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD1362 District is subject to the San Marco DA originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, which was found to be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the 1988 General Plan.
6. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD1362 District is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is prepared, in that the land uses and property development regulations allowed in the proposed ‘PD District’ will be similar to the land uses and property development regulations that were approved for other residential subdivisions in the San Marco Development area, i.e., Toscana (Village A), Positano (Village D – Units 11 and 12) and Capri (Village E – Unit 13) subdivisions:
161
Max. Lot Coverage: 55 percent
Min. Front Yard: 15 ft. to nearest wall
10 ft. to porch
18 ft. to garage
Min. Corner Side Yard: 8 ft.
Min. Side Yard: 4 ft.
Min. Rear Yard: 5 ft.
7. There is a community need for the proposed change to the amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District. Currently, the entire San Marco Development area is designated exclusively for residential use in the approved PD Plan. The proposed amendment would not increase the total number of units already envisioned for the San Marco Development but would increase the number of small-lot, singlefamily units in the project, thereby increasing opportunities for homeownership for entry-level buyers in the community.
8. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD1362 District will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, in that it would not increase the total number of units already envisioned for the San Marco Development and would provide well-designed, new homes for existing and new residents near the San Marco Commercial Center and the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station.
Vesting Tentative Map for Major Subdivision:
9. The Vesting Tentative Map for the proposed 206-unit, Major Subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential, as described in Section 2.A.3 above.
10. The project site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site is vacant, that all project construction will occur at elevations below the major ridgelines within the southern hills, and the site is surrounded by existing infrastructure, minimizing the amount of work and investment needed to extend utilities and services to the site.
11. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that the site is surrounded by existing single- and multifamily, residential development. Further, the site is located within one and one-half mile of the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station, less than a quartermile of two existing bus routes, a quarter-mile from the future San Marco Commercial Center and is adjacent to single- and multi-family homes, making it an appropriate location for residential low-density development. 162
12. The design of the proposed subdivision and accompanying improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, if the project is required to comply with conditions of approval in Exhibit E and all applicable mitigation measures and conditions of approval as outlined in Exhibit E Attachment 4 - Appendix G of the “Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the San Marco Development Plan (for Siena at San Marco, Units 16 and 17),” dated May 5, 2023.
13. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements proposed will not cause serious public health problems, in that the project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List and conditions of approval will require all site improvements comply with all local, City, State and federal regulations.
14. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that there are no existing public access easements on the site. The proposed map does include a new public street that will connect the development to existing public roadways, and the new street will be of sufficient width to accommodate automobile and emergency vehicle access into and around the site.
Design Review:
15. The proposed project conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality, in that the proposed house models feature an attractive architectural design characterized by a mixture of hipped and gable-end roofs with high-quality, concrete tile roofing material; stucco body and trim; simulated stone veneer; roll-up garage doors with optional window lites and a mixture of board and batten siding, wood trim, window grids, shutters and mock vents. The proposed project will also provide an attractive outdoor environment for residents. The Developer will install a variety of colorful, drought-tolerant landscaping and a decorative, masonry sound wall with wall caps and simulated stone veneer at each wall pilaster. Residential front yards will feature blooming street trees that will provide seasonal color throughout the subdivision.
16. The proposed project will be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors which may tend to make the environment less desirable, in that the project will be required to install three, six-ft. tall sound walls along the southern edge of the project site nearest West 163
Leland Road, one, eight-ft. tall and one, 10-ft. tall sound wall along the northern edge of the project site nearest State Route 4 and one, eight-ft. tall sound wall along the eastern edge of the project site to buffer noise from State Route 4, West Leland Road and the future San Marco Villas Phase III development. Additionally, upper-floor windows for 58 Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 must receive window assembly upgrades with a higher than average Sound Transmission Class rating.
17. The exterior design of the proposed project is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value. Rather, the proposed project will enhance the neighborhood’s appearance and value, in that it will result in a highly attractive environment utilizing a variety of compatible house and front yard landscape designs. The proposed project will add value to the community by attracting additional residential and commercial investment in the area.
18. The proposed project is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area, in that existing and proposed developments in the immediate vicinity of the project site are subject to the San Marco Development Plan, will be constructed by the same builder and include design elements compatible with other San Marco Subdivisions.
19. The proposed project will substantially conform to all applicable Development Review Design Guidelines (DRDG, Planning Commission Resolution No. 9864) for single-family development.
B. The Staff Report entitled, “Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR),” dated June 27, 2023, is referenced hereto as additional support for findings.
Section 3. Decision
Based on the findings and the authority set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance and resolution to:
A. Amend General Plan Figure 2-2 (Land Use Diagram) to change the land use designation of the property described in section 1.A above, from ‘High Density Residential’ and ‘Open Space’ to ‘Low Density Residential’ and ‘Open Space’ as substantially presented in Exhibit A of this resolution; 164
B. Modify other Land Use Element tables and charts as necessary to reflect the change in land use acreages and maintain internal consistency with the General Plan document;
C. Amend the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to single-family units as substantially presented in Exhibit B of this resolution; D. Approve Major Subdivision 9554 and Vesting Tentative Map subdividing the property described in section 1.A above into 206 lots for detached, single-family residences, subject to conditions, as substantially presented in Exhibit C of this resolution;
E. Approve Design Review of the accompanying architectural and landscape plans, subject to the conditions as substantially presented in Exhibit D of this resolution; and
F. Adopt Conditions of Approval for the project substantially presented in Exhibit E of this resolution, including all applicable mitigation measures and conditions of approval as outlined in Exhibit E Attachment 4 - Appendix G of the “Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the San Marco Development Plan (for Siena at San Marco, Units 16 and 17),” dated May 5, 2023.
Section 4. Effective Date
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
On motion by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner Smith, the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted the 27th day of June, 2023, by the Planning Commission of the City of Pittsburg, California by the following vote:
AYES: Robinson, Foster, Smith, Kobata, Jackson
NAYES: Popova
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
I hereby certify that the above Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Pittsburg on June 27, 2023.
______________________________________
JOHN FUNDERBURG III, SECRETARY
PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION
165
Attachment 4
Photos of Site and Surroundings
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR)
Unit 17
Above: View of back side of Unit 17 from Hwy 4 looking south Below: View of front side of Unit 17 from W Leland Rd looking north 166
Above: Body of the Unit 17 site, looking southwest from the northeast.
Above: Large hill in the approximate center of the Unit 17 site, looking south from the north edge.
167
Above: Southwest part of the Unit 17 site, looking northeast from the southwest corner of the site.
Above: Body of the Unit 17 site, looking northwest down the powerlines from the top of the large hill in the center of the site.
168
Above: Created detention basin adjacent to the northwest part of the Unit 17 site, looking northwest from the north edge of the site.
Above: Pipes associated with the storm drain network in the Unit 17 site, looking south from the northwest part of the site. 169
Unit 16
Above: South part of the Unit 16 site, looking northwest from the southeast part of the site.
Above: East edge of the Unit 16 site, looking north from the southeast part of the site.
170
Above: Existing storm drain structure in the west part of the Unit 16 site, looking northwest.
Above: North edge of the Unit 16 site, looking west along Leland Road.
171
Attachment 5
Map of Surrounding Uses
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR)
Project Site
172
Attachment 6
Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the San Marco Development Plan (for Siena at San Marco, Units 16 and 17) Available online at 37460005 Pittsburg Siena Village at San Marco (pittsburgca.gov) 173
City of Pittsburg
Community and Economic Development Department – Planning Division 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 | Tel: (925) 252-4920 | Fax: (925) 252-4814
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Pittsburg will conduct a public hearing on:
DATE: November 20, 2023
TIME: 7:00 p.m.
PLACE: City Council Chamber at City Hall
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California
Concerning the following matter:
Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) This is a public hearing on a request to: 1) introduce and waive first reading of an ordinance approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and 2) adopt a resolution approving a General Plan Map Amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision and Design Review on an approximately 58-acre portion of the San Marco project site located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071.
Environmental Determination
A Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified in accordance with CEQA to examine the potential environmental effects of the original project (Final EIR for the San Marco Subdivision). The Pittsburg City Council certified the Final SEIR in Resolution No. 93- 7888 on January 19, 1993, making the required findings under CEQA (State Clearinghouse No. 91073029). An Addendum to the certified Final SEIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 to address the proposed project (Siena at San Marco Units 16 and 17).
The Addendum must be considered by the City Council with Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR).
PROJECT PLANNER: Alison Hodgkin, (925) 252-6987 or [email protected] Why am I receiving this notice? You are receiving this notice because you have either previously requested notifications from the Planning Division, or a project has been proposed in your neighborhood and all property owners within a 300-ft. radius of the project site are required to be notified under the Pittsburg Municipal Code.
Where can I get more information about this project? The complete file for this project is available for public inspection; please contact the project planner listed above to make necessary arrangements.
What can I do if I have comments on the project? Comments or objections to the project can be made by writing or through e-mailed testimony prior to the meeting or provided orally during the meeting. Written comments citing the project name may be emailed to the project planner listed above or may be mailed or delivered to Pittsburg Planning Division, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565.
Pursuant to Section 65009 of the California Government Code, if you challenge this matter in court, you may be limited to those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence on the matter delivered to this agency at, or prior to the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division before the hearing body’s action on the matter will become a part of the administrative record.
________________________________
JOHN FUNDERBURG, SECRETARY
PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION
174
Project Title: Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) Location: Immediately south of Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits. Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and a portion of 091-050-071.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
City of Pittsburg
Community and Economic Development Department - Planning Division
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
Project
Site
175
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Approve Acceptance of the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Police Department is seeking City Council authorization to accept and allocate $37,029 in JAG Grant funds towards the purchase of a Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for the Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package will be covered through the allocation of JAG Grant funds and will have no impact to the 2023/24 Fiscal Budget. The quote is for $38,099.70, with the JAG Grant covering most of the costs. An additional amount of $1,070.70 in purchase costs will be covered through the Police Department’s Camera Network budget.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing acceptance and allocation of $37,029 in awarded JAG Grant funds towards the purchase of the Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package.
BACKGROUND
Over the last 15 years, the Police Department has built a robust network of Public Safety Cameras throughout the City of Pittsburg. These cameras have proved to be a valuable tool in safeguarding the residents of Pittsburg through supplementing criminal investigation efforts as well as serving as a deterrent to criminal activity within the City limits.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was presented and supported by the Public Safety Subcommittee on November 7, 2023.
176
STAFF ANALYSIS
The addition of the Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package would assist in the Police Department’s efforts to continue to ensure our overall Public Safety Camera network can keep up with the City of Pittsburg’s geographical growth and expansion insuring our high standard of protection for the residents of Pittsburg.
Based on a need to match the growth of the Police Department’s Public Safety Camera System with the expansion and growth of the City’s geographical footprint, it is staff’s recommendation that City Council adopt the resolution in support and allocation of $37,029 in JAG Grants funds for the purchase of the Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package.
ATTACHMENTS: RESOLUTION
Exhibit A Vigilant Camera Expansion Quote
Report Prepared By: Steve Albanese, Chief of Police
177
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Approving Acceptance and Authorizing )
Use of Funds from the U.S. Department ) RESOLUTION NO. 23- Of Justice Edward Byrne Memorial )
Justice Assistance Grant )
WHEREAS, the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program allows local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent crime and improve the criminal justice system; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department has applied for $37,029 in program funds to fund the purchase of a Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to accept grant funds from the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistant, allocate the funds for the purchase of a Vigilant Public Safety Camera Expansion Package for the Police Department, establish necessary fiscal accounting from fund 291, and execute all necessary documents.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 20th day of November 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
178
Quote For:
Pittsburg PD
Reference:
Commercial Data < 100
Quote By:
Lehr
Mike McGee
Date: 08-30-23
179
Lehr
4707 Northgate Blvd.
Sacramento, California 95834
(P) 916-267-5547
Issued To: Pittsburg PD - Attention: Hatcher Date: 08-30-23 Project Name: Commercial Data < 100 Quote ID: MFM-0536-02 Qty Item # Description
(1) VS-ILP-1F2RE
$29,753.00 Each
Intelligence Led Policing Package w/ (3) Fixed LPR Cameras (Reaper) - Up to 100 Sworn
● Stationary Mount LPR Cameras - Quantity = 3 'Reaper' LPR Cameras o Power over Ethernet (POE) LPR cameras w/ Integrated processors o Lens configuration to be confirmed by customer at time of order ● CarDetector Fixed LPR Software for LPR server
● LEARN Software as a Service (SaaS) including:
o LEARN Data Analytic Tools
o Unlimited Commercial LPR data Access
o Hosting, data and system management of LPR data
o LEARN-Mobile Companion SmartPhone application (Android & iPhone) ● First year Standard Service Package for hosted LPR server access ● ComparisonManager Hosted Facial Recognition
o Image gallery of up to 5,000 images
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax) $29,753.00
Qty Item # Description
(2) BCAV1F2-C600
$3,295.00 Each
Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box
● Manages power and communications for up to four (4) Vigilant fixed LPR cameras ● Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included
Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax) $6,590.00
Qty Item # Description
(3) VS-FX-UNI-POLEWALL-ASSY
$350.00 Each
Fixed LPR Camera Bracket
● Pole or Wall Mount - UPR ARM ASSY POLE & WALL MOUNT BLK REV B Subtotal Price (Excluding sales tax) $1,050.00
Qty Item # Description
(1) TAX ON COMMS BOX
$706.70 Each
Local Tax Rate 9.25%
Subtotal Price $706.70
180
This purchase does not include a SIM for cellular service
1. MSI's Master Customer Agreement: https://www.motorolasolutions.com/en_us/about/legal.html (and all applicable addenda) shall govern the products & services and is incorporated herein by this reference. Any free services provided under this offer are provided AS IS with no express or implied warranty Quoted by: Mike McGee - 925-303-9513 - [email protected] Total Price $38,099.70
181
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Receive and File the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2023
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2023. The report includes the combined detailed information of the City and the Successor Agency’s (Agency) investments, which are compliant with the City’s and Agency’s Investment Policies.
FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s expenditure requirements for the next six months are covered by anticipated revenues from City operations and liquidity from maturing investments. The difference between market value and cost as of September 30, 2023, will be reflected in the City’s financial statements for Fiscal Year 2023-24 as an adjustment to interest income for each of the City’s funds on a pro rata basis as required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 31. Due to the recent rise in interest rates available in the capital markets, value for existing holdings have fallen on paper and will not be realized. This drop in value had increased as inflationary pressure have continued to move rates higher. Market values change on a daily basis. The change in market value is considered temporary in nature, as the City mostly holds its investments until maturity, when they can be redeemed at par value.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council accept the Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2023, for information purposes only.
BACKGROUND
Each fiscal quarter, an Investment Summary Report is required to be provided, by policy, to the City Council for review.
182
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The City’s objectives in order of priority, are to provide safety, ensure the preservation of capital, provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and earn a competitive rate of return (yield) within the confines of the California Government Code and the Investment Policy. Chandler Asset Management is responsible for managing investments in accordance with the City’s investment policy. All portfolio holdings were held with investment grade securities.
The advisor-managed funds are comprised of operating funds managed in a Core Portfolio account, as well as several Non-Successor Agency bond-related funds. The City’s advisor works to achieve the City’s objectives by investing in high quality fixed income securities consistent with the City’s investment policy and California Government Code.
The Core Portfolio represents the City’s cash reserves. Its return objective is to enhance both interest income and principal value as measured by total return. Total return reflects the value added to the portfolio for a period of time from interest income, realized gains and losses, as well as unrealized gains and losses. The portfolio’s total return for the quarter was 0.71%, comparing to the City performance benchmark of 0.74%, the Intercontinental Exchange Bank of America Merrill Lynch (ICE BAML) 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency Index.
Since inception (7/31/2018), the portfolio’s total return through quarter end is 1.33%, which slightly overperformed the benchmark return of 1.06% for the same period. Total returns for the quarter and since inception reflect fluctuations in market value. 183
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 31 requires the City to recognize the fair market value of its investments at the end of each fiscal year. The market values of investments included in this report were obtained from the State Controller’s office for Local Agency Investment Funds (LAIF), and from the City’s registered investment advisor and bond trustees for longer-term investments.
Attached is the Chandler Asset Management (CAM) Investment Report detailing an economic update, account profile and investment activity for the quarter ending September 30, 2023.
ATTACHMENTS: Letter from City Treasurer
Investment Report by Chandler Asset Management
Report Prepared By: Christina Nguyen, Accountant II
Report Reviewed By: Laura Mendez, Finance Manager of Reporting 184
185
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. | 800.317.4747 | www.chandlerasset.com
INVESTMENT REPORT
Period Ending September 30, 2023
City of Pittsburg
186
SECTION 1 Economic Update
SECTION 2 Account Profile
SECTION 3 Consolidated Information
SECTION 4 Portfolio Holdings
SECTION 5 Transactions
Table of Contents As of September 30, 2023
1 187
SECTION | Section 1 | Economic Update
2 188
Economic Update
Recent economic data has shown above trend growth fueled by a rise in consumer spending and a continuing healthy US job market.
Inflationary trends are subsiding, but core levels remain well above the Fed’s target. Given the cumulative effects of restrictive monetary policy and tighter financial conditions, we believe the economy will gradually soften and the Fed will remain data dependent as they tread cautiously going forward.
As anticipated at the September meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to maintain the target Federal Funds at the range of 5.25 - 5.50%. The Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) also revealed expectations of higher economic growth, reduced unemployment, and a gradual easing of inflation compared to earlier forecasts. The Fed is continuing to focus on achieving price stability and bringing inflation down toward their 2% policy objective, while leaving the option open for the possibility of additional rate hikes in the future if needed.
The yield curve remained inverted in September. The 2-year Treasury yield increased 18 basis points to 5.05%, the 5-year Treasury yield rose 36 basis points to 4.61%, and the 10-year Treasury yield increased 46 basis points to 4.57%. The inversion between the 2-year Treasury yield and 10-year Treasury yield narrowed to -48 basis points at September month-end versus -76 basis points at August monthend. The spread between the 2-year Treasury and 10-year Treasury yield one year ago was -45 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries narrowed to -88 basis points in September from -134 basis points in August. The shape of the yield curve indicates that the probability of recession persists.
3 189
Employment
-400
-200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000 MOM Change In Thousands (000's)
Nonfarm Payroll (000's)
Non-farm Payroll (000's)
3 month average (000's)
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate (U6)
Unemployment Rate (U3)
Rate (%)
The U.S. economy added 336,000 jobs in September, exceeding consensus expectations of 170,000, and the last two months were revised upward by 119,000 jobs. The largest gains came from leisure and hospitality, bringing restaurant and bar employment back in-line with pre-pandemic levels. The pace of job growth has picked up recently, with the three-month moving average payrolls at 266,000 and the sixmonth moving average at 234,000. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.8%, and the labor participation rate was consistent with last month’s report at 62.8%. The U-6 underemployment rate, which includes those who are marginally attached to the labor force and employed part time for economic reasons declined slightly to 7.0% from the prior month at 7.1%. Average hourly earnings declined to
4.2% year-over-year in September from 4.3% in August. Employment remains strong by historical standards.
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor 4 190
Job Openings & Labor Turnover Survey
0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Job Openings
Recession
Historical Average
In Thousands (000's)
The Labor Department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) unexpectedly increased to 9.61 million in August from a revised
8.92 million in July. The level significantly surpassed the survey of Bloomberg economists’ expectations of 8.82 million and reflects approximately 1.5 job openings per available worker. Although JOLTS was an upside surprise, the quits rate remained at a benign 2.3% for August, well below its 3.0% peak in April 2022. Fewer quits can imply that workers are less confident in their ability to find another job in the current market. The current level of job openings remains elevated from a historical perspective.
Source: US Department of Labor
5 191
Inflation
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
CPI YOY % Change
Core CPI YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)
PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change
PCE Core Deflator YOY % Change
Fed Target
YOY (%) Change
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased in September by 0.4% month-over-month and 3.7% year-over-year, slightly higher than expected. Gains in shelter and energy costs accounted for a large part of the monthly increase. The Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, was up 0.3% month-over-month and 4.1% year-over-year, decelerating from 4.3% last month. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) index rose 0.4% month-over-month and 3.4% year-over-year in September, unchanged from August. Core PCE, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge, increased 0.3% month-over-month and decelerated to 3.7% year-over-year in September from a 3.8% increase in August. Personal income and spending remained relatively healthy, but the personal savings rate continued its declining trend to 3.4% in September from 4.0% in August. Inflation remains above the Fed's 2% target.
Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce 6 192
Consumer
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Retail Sales YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
Retail Sales rose 0.7% in September after an upward revision to 0.8% in August, exceeding the consensus forecast. Control Group Sales, which are used to calculate gross domestic product and exclude food services, auto dealers, building materials stores and gasoline stations, rebounded 0.6% and reflected broad increases across sectors. On a year-over-year basis, Retail Sales growth accelerated 3.8% in September versus an upwardly revised 2.9% gain in August. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index dropped more than expected to 103.0 in September from an upwardly revised 108.7 in August, primarily due to significantly weaker future expectations for employment. While the consumer has been resilient, dwindling excess savings, rising credit card balances, and the resumption of student loan payments pose potential headwinds to future economic growth. 80 90
100
110
120
130
140
Index Level
Consumer Confidence
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board 7 193
Leading Indicators of Economic Activity
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
Recession
YOY (%) Change
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00 0.25
0.50 0.75
1.00 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)
Recession
3 Month Average
The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI) fell 0.7% in September, continuing the persistent decline for the last year and a half. The index declined 7.8% year-over-year. The consistent decline month-over-month continues to signal future contraction in the economy. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) surprised to the upside at 0.02 in September from a downwardly revised -0.22 in August. On a 3-month moving average basis, the CFNAI improved to 0.00 in September, indicating a rate of growth about equal to the historical average trend.
Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago 8 194
Housing
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400
In Thousands of Units
Annualized Housing Starts
Multi Family Housing Starts
Single Family Housing Starts
Housing Starts recovered 7% in September to an annual rate of 1.358 million units. Starts were up 17.6% for multi-family units and 3.2% for single-family. Total starts of new homes are down 7.2% year-over-year. According to Freddie Mac, average 30-year fixed rate mortgage rates increased to 7.71% as of October 19th. According to the Case-Shiller 20-City Home Price Index, housing prices rose 0.1% year-over-year in July, improving from a 1.2% decline in June. Tight inventories and higher mortgage rates continue to impact affordability.
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P
-20.0%
-16.0%
-12.0%
-8.0%
-4.0%
0.0%
4.0%
8.0%
12.0%
16.0%
20.0%
24.0%
S&P/Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index
Recession
YOY (%) Change
9 195
Survey Based Measures
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Surveys
ISM Manufacturing ISM Services
EXPANDING
CONTRACTING
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing index remained in contraction territory at 49.0 in September, up from 47.6 in August. This is the eleventh consecutive month of readings below 50.0, which is indicative of contraction in the manufacturing sector.
However, this is the highest reading since November 2022, as both employment and new orders improved, while prices paid subsided.
The ISM Services Index eased to 53.6 in September from the six-month high of 54.5 in August. The prices paid component continued to grow primarily due to high labor costs and an uptick in energy costs, but new orders reflected a significant slowdown.
Source: Institute for Supply Management
10 196
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
Components of GDP 12/22 3/23 6/23 9/23
0.8% 2.5% 0.6% 2.7%
0.6% -1.7% 0.9% 1.5%
0.3% 0.6% 0.0% -0.1%
0.6% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4%
0.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4%
2.6% 2.3% 2.1% 4.9%
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Gross Private Domestic Investment
Net Exports and Imports
Federal Government Expenditures
Total
State and Local (Consumption and Gross
Investment)
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP QOQ % Change
GDP YOY % Change
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce According to the “advance” estimate, third quarter GDP exceeded expectations at an annualized rate of 4.9%, following 2.1% in the second quarter, marking the fastest growth in nearly two years. The largest contributor to the rise was the 4.0% increase in consumer spending across both goods and services. Almost all the major components made a positive contribution to GDP, except for a small decline in net exports. The consensus estimate calls for a marked slowing to 0.8% in the fourth quarter and 2.2% for full year 2023. 11 197
Federal Reserve
Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg
0 1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets
Recession
In $ millions
At the September meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to leave the Federal Funds rate unchanged at a target range of 5.25 - 5.50%. Nonetheless, the Fed conveyed a consensus view that another rate hike is possible later in the year, along with its commitment to keeping rates at their current level until inflation subsides closer to its 2% target, endorsing a data-dependent 'higher-forlonger' strategy. The Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) also revealed expectations of higher economic growth, reduced unemployment, and a gradual easing of inflation compared to earlier forecasts. We believe the resiliency of future economic data will determine if the Federal Reserve can stay on hold for or will tighten policy further to curb inflation. Since the Federal Reserve began its Quantitative Tightening campaign in June 2022, securities holdings have declined by over $1 trillion to $8.024T.
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
6.00%
Effective Federal Funds Rate
Recession
Yield (%)
12 198
Bond Yields
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
US Treasury Note Yields
2-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Yield (%)
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
US Treasury Yield Curve
Sep-23
Jun-23
Sep-22
Yield (%)
At the end of September, the 2-year Treasury yield was 77 basis points higher, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was about 74 basis points higher, year-over-year. The inversion between the 2-year Treasury yield and 10-year Treasury yield narrowed to -48 basis points at September month-end versus -76 basis points at August month-end. The average historical spread (since 2003) is about +130 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries narrowed to -88 basis points in September from -134 basis points in August. The shape of the yield curve indicates that the probability of recession persists. 13 199
Section 2| SECTION | Section 2 | Account Profile
14 200
Objectives
Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective
The performance objective for the portfolio is to earn a total rate of return through a market cycle that is equal to or above the return on the benchmark index.
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives for the City of Pittsburg, in order of priority, are to provide safety to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio, provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and a market rate of return consistent with the investment program.
Strategy
In order to achieve these objectives, the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income securities consistent with the City’s investment policy and California Government Code.
As of September 30, 2023
15 201
Compliance As of September 30, 2023
Category Standard Comment
U.S. Treasuries No Limitation; Full faith and credit of the U.S. are pledged for the payment of principal and interest Complies Federal Agencies
30% max per Agency/GSE issuer; 20% max agency callable securities; Federal agency or U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.
Complies
Supranational Obligations "AA" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% max; 10% max per issuer; USD denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations; Issued or unconditionally guaranteed by IBRD, IFC, IADB Complies Municipal Securities (CA, Other States)
"A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% max; 5% max per issuer; Obligations of the City, State of California and any local agency within the state; Bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to California; Including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.
Complies
Corporate Medium Term Notes "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% max; 5% max per issuer; Issuer is a corporation organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S Complies Asset-Backed, Mortgage-Backed,
Mortgage Pass-Through Securities,
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
"AA" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 20% max (combined ABS/MBS/CMO); 5% max per Asset-Backed or Commercial Mortgage security issuer; From issuers not defined in US Treasury and Federal Agencies of the Eligible Investments section of the policy
Complies
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit (NCD)
The amount of NCD insured up to the FDIC limit does not require any credit ratings; Any amount above FDIC insured limit must be issued by institutions with "A-1" short-term debt rating or higher by a NRSRO; or "A" long-term rating category or higher by a NRSRO; 30% max; 5% max per issuer; Issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank, or a federal or state association, a state or federal credit union, or by a federally-licensed or state-licensed branch of a foreign bank.
Complies
Time Deposits (Non-negotiable &
Collateralized CD/TD)
"A" rated or one of the three highest rating categories by a NRSRO; 30% max; 5% max per issuer; 1 year max maturity; Nonnegotiable time deposits that are FDIC insured or fully collateralized in financial institutions located in California, including US branches of foreign banks licensed to do business in California Complies
Banker’s Acceptances "A-1" rated or highest short-term rating category by a NRSRO; 40% max; 5% max per issuer; 180 days max maturity Complies Commercial Paper
"A-1" short-term ratings or higher by a NRSRO; "A" long-term rating category or higher by a NRSRO, if any; 25% max; Under a provision sunsetting on January 1, 2026, no more than 40% of the portfolio may be invested in Commercial Paper if the City’s investment assets under management are greater than $100 million; 5% max per issuer; 270 days max maturity; 10% max of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer; Issued by an entity that meets all the following conditions in either (1) or (2): 1. (a) organized and operating in the U.S. as a general corporation (b) has assets > $500 million; (c) "A" rating category or higher by a NRSRO, if any debt 2. (a) organized within the U.S. as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company; (b) has program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, overcollateralization, letters of credit, or a surety bond; (c) "A-1" rating category or higher by a NRSRO.
Complies
City of Pittsburg Managed Consolidated
This portfolio is a consolidation of assets managed by Chandler Asset Management. Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and Client's investment policy. Chandler relies on City to provide accurate information for reporting assets and producing this compliance statement. 16 202
Compliance As of September 30, 2023
Category Standard Comment
Money Market Mutual Funds
Registered with SEC under Investment Company Act of 1940; issued by diversified management companies and meet either of the following criteria: (i) Highest rating by two NRSROs; or (ii) Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from SEC registration with > 5 years experience managing money market mutual funds with AUM >$500 million; 20% max Money Market Funds; 10% max per Fund
Complies
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Maximum amount permitted by LAIF; Not used by investment adviser Complies California Asset Management Program
(CAMP)
Shares of beneficial interest issued by a joint powers authority pursuant to California Government Code; Not used by investment adviser Complies
Repurchase Agreements
Primary government securities dealers rated in one of the three highest categories by two NRSROs; Counterparties should also have: i) short-term rating in the highest category; ii) $25 billion minimum assets and $350 million in capital size; iii) 5 years audited financial results; iv) strong reputation; 15% max; 5% max per issuer; 90 days max maturity; 102% collateralized with U.S. Treasury or Federal Agency securities; Not used by investment adviser Complies
Prohibited
Investments not described in the policy, including but not limited to: Common stocks, Futures contracts, Options, Inverse floaters, Range notes, Mortgage derived Interest-only strips, or any security that could result in zero interest accrual securities if held to maturity; Purchase of any security not listed in Section 8-Eligible Investments of the Investment Policy, unless approved by the City Council
Complies
Max Per Issuer 5% of portfolio per issuer unless otherwise specified in the policy Complies Maximum Maturity 5 years, except as otherwise stated in the policy Complies City of Pittsburg Managed Consolidated
This portfolio is a consolidation of assets managed by Chandler Asset Management. Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and Client's investment policy. Chandler relies on City to provide accurate information for reporting assets and producing this compliance statement. 17 203
Account Structure As of September 30, 2023
*Market value changes daily and is subject to a number of economic forces, including supply and demand, and can incur unrealized gains and losses.
Original Cost Market Value % of Portfolio
Funds Managed Internally
Cash Equivalents 11,884,159.36 11,884,159.36 5.31%
Investment Pools 45,485,519.52 44,862,719.92 20.03%
Additional Bonded Debt Funds 64,001,941.55 64,007,280.53 28.58% Total 121,371,620.43 120,754,159.81 53.92%
Funds Managed by City's Investment Advisor
Operating Funds 98,684,211.20 96,813,491.74 43.23%
Bond Managed Reserve 3,499,842.47 3,515,448.18 1.57%
Total 102,184,053.67 100,328,939.92 44.80%
City's Section 115 Trust
Section 115 Trust 2,991,253.78 2,846,892.20 1.27%
Total 2,991,253.78 2,846,892.20 1.27%
Total City Funds 226,546,927.88 223,929,991.93 100.00%
18 204
Sector Allocation As of September 30, 2023
1,2Funds not managed by City's investment adviser; 3Bonded Debt Funds not managed, nor tracked by City's investment adviser *Market value changes daily and is subject to a number of economic forces, including supply and demand, and can incur unrealized gains and losses.
Security Type Original Cost Market Value % of Portfolio Average Maturity Average Yield Operating Funds
Cash Equivalents1 11,884,159.36 11,884,159.36 7.74% 1 N/A Money Market Funds 1,733,103.90 1,733,103.90 1.13% 1 5.01% Investment Pools2 45,485,519.52 44,862,719.92 29.22% 1 N/A Total Liquidity 59,102,782.78 58,479,983.18 38.08% 1 5.01% U.S. Treasury Notes 42,671,355.23 42,122,677.37 27.43% 237 3.59% Federal Agency Securities 16,723,621.65 16,356,954.45 10.65% 683 2.33% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 3,998,754.18 3,994,312.00 2.60% 237 5.67% Medium-Term Corporate Notes 16,877,559.10 16,286,820.48 10.61% 522 2.28% Asset-Backed Securities 4,240,916.44 4,151,156.60 2.70% 1066 2.78% Commercial Paper 2,882,872.22 2,902,439.17 1.89% 208 5.90% Supranationals 3,370,446.45 3,249,981.74 2.12% 369 1.30% Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 6,185,582.03 6,016,046.03 3.92% 1234 4.29% Total Securities 96,951,107.30 95,080,387.84 61.92% 465 3.24% Total Operating Funds 156,053,890.08 153,560,371.02 100.00% 289 2.06% Bonded Debt Funds
Pittsburg Pension Bond 2,363,344.87 2,378,759.34 3.52% 77 5.41% Pittsburg AD Auto Mall 343,825.40 344,016.64 0.51% 135 5.47% Pittsburg AD Vista DM 792,672.20 792,672.20 1.17% 1 5.21% Additional Bonded Debt Funds3 64,001,941.55 64,007,280.53 94.79% N/A N/A Total Bonded Debt Funds 67,501,784.02 67,522,728.71 100.00% 65 5.37% Section 115 Trust
Equity Mutual Fund2 2,991,253.78 2,846,892.20 100.00% N/A N/A Total Section 115 Trust Funds 2,991,253.78 2,846,892.20 100.00% N/A N/A Total City Funds 226,546,927.88 223,929,991.93
19 205
Portfolio Characteristics
City of Pittsburg Managed Consolidated
09/30/23
Portfolio
06/30/23
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 1.50 1.49
Modified Duration 1.32 1.31
Average Purchase Yield 3.22% 2.79%
Average Market Yield 5.29% 5.10%
Average Quality* AA+/Aa1 AA+/Aa1
Total Market Value 97,206,935 96,354,047
*Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s, respectively.
As of September 30, 2023
20 206
Purchase Yield as of 09/30/23 = 2.43%
0.00 0.50
1.00 1.50
2.00 2.50
3.00 Percent (%)
Historical Average Purchase Yield
City of Pittsburg
As of September 30, 2023
21 207
Portfolio Characteristics
City of Pittsburg Bond Reserve Consolidated
09/30/23
Portfolio
06/30/23
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.18 0.00
Modified Duration 0.18 0.00
Average Purchase Yield 5.37% 4.97%
Average Market Yield 5.37% 4.97%
Average Quality* AAA/Aaa AAA/Aaa
Total Market Value 3,515,448 6,762,805
*Portfolio is S&P and Moody’s, respectively.
As of September 30, 2023
22 208
SECTION | Section 3 | Consolidated Information
23 209
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated
Sector Distribution
ABS
1.9%
Agency
7.3%
Cash
33.8%
CMO
2.7%
Commercial
Paper
1.3%
Corporate
7.3%
Equity Mutual
Fund
1.3%
Investment Pool
20.0%
Money Market
Fund
1.2%
Negotiable CD
1.8%
Supranational
1.5%
US Treasury
20.0%
September 30, 2023 June 30, 2023
ABS
1.7% Agency
8.7%
Cash
40.4%
CMO
2.3%
Commercial
Paper
0.7%
Corporate
5.5%
Equity Mutual
Fund
1.1%
Investment Pool
20.1%
Money Market
Fund
2.9%
Negotiable CD
1.1%
Supranational
0.9%
US Treasury
14.4%
As of September 30, 2023
24 210
Issue Name Investment Type S&P Rating Moody Rating % Portfolio City of Pittsburg Cash NR NR 33.83%
City of Pittsburg Investment Pool NR NR 20.00%
Government of United States US Treasury AA+ Aaa 12.03%
Government of United States US Treasury A-1+ P-1 7.95%
Federal Home Loan Bank Agency AA+ Aaa 3.21%
Federal Farm Credit Bank Agency AA+ Aaa 1.72%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp CMO NR NR 1.54%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Agency AA+ Aaa 1.27%
City of Pittsburg PARS 115 Trust Equity Mutual Fund NR NR 1.27% Federal National Mortgage Association Agency AA+ Aaa 1.13% Westpac Banking Corp NY Negotiable CD A-1+ P-1 0.92%
Cooperatieve Rabobank UA Negotiable CD A-1 P-1 0.89%
MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Commercial Paper A-1 P-1 0.86%
Wells Fargo Advantage Govt Money Market Fund Money Market Fund AAA Aaa 0.77% Intl Bank Recon and Development Supranational AAA Aaa 0.74% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp CMO AAA NR 0.73%
Inter-American Dev Bank Supranational AAA Aaa 0.71%
JP Morgan ABS ABS AAA NR 0.43%
Toyota Motor Corp Commercial Paper A-1+ P-1 0.43%
JP Morgan Chase & Co Corporate A- A1 0.43%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp CMO NR Aaa 0.42%
Wells Fargo Adv Tsy Plus Money Market Fund Money Market Fund AAA Aaa 0.41% Deere & Company Corporate A A2 0.40%
Paccar Financial Corporate A+ A1 0.34%
Toronto Dominion Holdings Corporate A A1 0.33%
Mass Mutual Insurance Corporate AA+ Aa3 0.33%
Amazon.com Inc Corporate AA A1 0.32%
Apple Inc Corporate AA+ Aaa 0.32%
Chubb Corporation Corporate A A3 0.32%
Bank of Montreal Chicago Corporate A- A2 0.32%
Charles Schwab Corp/The Corporate A- A2 0.32%
Honeywell Corp Corporate A A2 0.31%
Caterpillar Inc Corporate A A2 0.31%
Toyota Motor Corp Corporate A+ A1 0.28%
Northern Trust Corp Corporate A+ A2 0.26%
MasterCard Inc Corporate A+ Aa3 0.26%
Bank of America Corp Corporate A- A1 0.24%
State Street Bank Corporate A A1 0.24%
Issuers
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated – Account #10638
As of September 30, 2023
25 211
Issue Name Investment Type S&P Rating Moody Rating % Portfolio Bank of America Corp Corporate A+ Aa1 0.22%
US Bancorp Corporate A A3 0.22%
Bank of New York Corporate A A1 0.22%
National Rural Utilities Corporate A- A1 0.22%
American Express ABS ABS AAA NR 0.22%
Home Depot Corporate A A2 0.22%
Royal Bank of Canada Corporate A A1 0.22%
Duke Energy Field Services Corporate A Aa3 0.21%
Target Corp Corporate A A2 0.21%
John Deere ABS ABS NR Aaa 0.21%
Hyundai Auto Receivables ABS AAA NR 0.19%
GM Financial Automobile Leasing Trust ABS AAA NR 0.15%
United Health Group Inc Corporate A+ A2 0.11%
Honda ABS ABS AAA NR 0.10%
Honda ABS ABS NR Aaa 0.09%
BMW ABS ABS AAA Aaa 0.08%
Toyota ABS ABS AAA NR 0.07%
GM Financial Securitized Term Auto Trust ABS NR Aaa 0.07% Wal-Mart Stores Corporate AA Aa2 0.07%
Toyota ABS ABS NR Aaa 0.06%
BMW ABS ABS AAA NR 0.06%
Salesforce.com Inc Corporate A+ A2 0.05%
Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust ABS AAA NR 0.05%
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust ABS AAA NR 0.04%
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust ABS NR Aaa 0.01%
TOTAL 100%
Issuers
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated – Account #10638
As of September 30, 2023
26 212
AAA AA A <A NR
09/30/23 14.1% 22.2% 6.3% 0.0% 57.5%
06/30/23 12.4% 18.8% 4.6% 0.0% 64.2%
Source: S&P Ratings
September 30, 2023 vs. June 30, 2023
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
AAA AA A <A NR
09/30/23 06/30/23
Quality Distribution
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated
As of September 30, 2023
27 213
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
55.0%
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ September 30, 2023 June 30, 2023
September 30, 2023 vs. June 30, 2023
0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5+ 09/30/23 66.1% 5.6% 8.9% 7.8% 5.6% 5.0% 1.0% 0.0%
06/30/23 71.3% 7.2% 5.5% 6.6% 4.2% 4.0% 1.2% 0.0%
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated
Duration Distribution As of September 30, 2023
28 214
SECTION | Section 3 | Portfolio Holdings
29 215
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
36262XAC8 GM Financial Auto Lease Trust 2021-3 A2
0.390% Due 10/21/2024
49,190.48 05/09/2022
2.83%
47,699.39
48,923.10
99.36 5.86%
48,873.74
5.86 0.02%
(49.36)
NR / AAA
AAA
1.06 0.12
58769KAD6 Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2021-B A3
0.400% Due 11/15/2024
107,745.16 06/22/2021
0.40%
107,737.02
107,744.23
99.15 5.55%
106,826.74
19.15 0.05%
(917.49)
NR / AAA
AAA
1.13 0.16
09690AAC7 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2021-2 A3
0.330% Due 12/26/2024
33,209.09 09/08/2021
0.34%
33,205.66
33,208.74
99.43 5.99%
33,020.56
1.83 0.01%
(188.18)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.24 0.10
89236XAC0 Toyota Auto Receivables 2020-D A3
0.350% Due 01/15/2025
20,012.72 10/06/2020
0.36%
20,008.99
20,011.59
99.47 6.23%
19,906.63
3.11 0.01%
(104.96)
NR / AAA
AAA
1.30 0.09
05601XAC3 BMW Vehicle Lease Trust 2022-1 A3
1.100% Due 03/25/2025
99,753.50 01/11/2022
1.11%
99,738.59
99,750.20
98.83 6.13%
98,582.89
18.29 0.04%
(1,167.31)
NR / AAA
AAA
1.48 0.23
43813GAC5 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2021-1 A3
0.270% Due 04/21/2025
38,964.82 02/17/2021
0.27%
38,964.10
38,964.71
98.22 6.10%
38,271.17
2.92 0.02%
(693.54)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.56 0.30
89240BAC2 Toyota Auto Receivables Owners 2021-A A3
0.260% Due 05/15/2025
142,685.77 02/02/2021
0.27%
142,659.28
142,681.88
98.27 6.03%
140,223.30
16.49 0.06%
(2,458.58)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.62 0.30
36266FAC3 GM Financial Auto Lease Trust 2022-2 A3
3.420% Due 06/20/2025
295,000.00 05/03/2022
3.45%
294,969.23
294,988.74
98.79 6.03%
291,437.88
308.28
0.13%
(3,550.86)
NR / AAA
AAA
1.72 0.47
47788UAC6 John Deere Owner Trust 2021-A A3
0.360% Due 09/15/2025
86,421.27 03/02/2021
0.37%
86,404.66
86,416.47
97.63 6.07%
84,372.91
13.83 0.04%
(2,043.56)
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.96 0.41
43815EAC8 Honda Auto Receivables 2021-3 A3
0.410% Due 11/18/2025
243,131.64 08/17/2021
0.41%
243,128.08
243,130.39
96.84 6.06%
235,445.51
36.00 0.10%
(7,684.88)
NR / AAA
AAA
2.14 0.56
43815GAC3 Honda Auto Receivables Trust 2021-4 A3
0.880% Due 01/21/2026
158,570.76 11/16/2021
0.89%
158,537.33
158,556.40
96.10 6.44%
152,388.56
38.76 0.07%
(6,167.84)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.31 0.70
47789QAC4 John Deere Owner Trust 2021-B A3
0.520% Due 03/16/2026
173,503.58 07/13/2021
0.52%
173,488.10
173,497.41
96.59 5.88%
167,580.51
40.10 0.07%
(5,916.90)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.46 0.64
89238JAC9 Toyota Auto Receivables Trust 2021-D A3
0.710% Due 04/15/2026
151,369.16 11/09/2021
0.71%
151,365.93
151,367.79
96.20 6.20%
145,614.56
47.77 0.06%
(5,753.23)
NR / AAA
AAA
2.54 0.69
44935FAD6 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2021-C A3
0.740% Due 05/15/2026
294,762.37 07/27/2022
3.53%
281,578.66
287,855.92
96.64 5.94%
284,861.01
96.94 0.13%
(2,994.91)
NR / AAA
AAA
2.62 0.64
05602RAD3 BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2022-A A3
3.210% Due 08/25/2026
195,000.00 05/10/2022
3.23%
194,989.86
194,994.34
97.56 5.95%
190,232.45
104.33
0.08%
(4,761.89)
Aaa / AAA
NR
2.90 0.90
47787JAC2 John Deere Owner Trust 2022-A A3
2.320% Due 09/16/2026
230,000.00 03/10/2022
2.34%
229,949.12
229,971.56
96.82 6.16%
222,674.73
237.16
0.10%
(7,296.83)
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.96 0.83
448977AD0 Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2022-A A3
2.220% Due 10/15/2026
136,000.00 05/02/2022
3.34%
132,685.00
134,185.20
96.77 5.74%
131,602.44
134.19
0.06%
(2,582.76)
NR / AAA
AAA
3.04 0.92
As of September 30, 2023
30 216
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
36265WAD5 GM Financial Securitized Auto 2022-3 A3
3.640% Due 04/16/2027
165,000.00 07/06/2022
3.67%
164,998.86
164,999.30
97.51 5.63%
160,887.87
250.25
0.07%
(4,111.43)
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.55 1.28
02582JJT8 American Express Credit Trust 2022-2 A
3.390% Due 05/17/2027
510,000.00 05/17/2022
3.42%
509,887.19
509,938.56
96.51 5.72%
492,185.19
768.40
0.22%
(17,753.37)
NR / AAA
AAA
3.63 1.53
161571HS6 Chase Issuance Trust 22-A1 A
3.970% Due 09/15/2027
1,000,000.00 05/11/2023
4.28%
993,945.31
994,929.64
97.15 5.58%
971,523.00
1,764.44
0.43%
(23,406.64)
NR / AAA
AAA
3.96 1.82
05592XAD2 BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A A3
5.470% Due 02/25/2028
135,000.00 07/11/2023
5.54%
134,976.08
134,977.54
99.74 5.67%
134,644.95
123.08
0.06%
(332.59)
NR / AAA
AAA
4.41 1.88
TOTAL ABS 4,265,320.32 2.78%
4,240,916.44
4,251,093.71 5.85%
4,151,156.60
4,031.18
1.85%
(99,937.11)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
2.92 1.05
Agency
3133EMBS0 FFCB Note
0.200% Due 10/02/2023
1,000,000.00 09/28/2020
0.24%
998,810.00
999,998.91
100.00
0.20%
1,000,000.00
994.44
0.45%
1.09 Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.01 0.01
3137EAEY1 FHLMC Note
0.125% Due 10/16/2023
885,000.00 10/14/2020
0.25%
881,698.95
884,954.78
99.79 4.76%
883,177.79
507.03
0.39%
(1,776.99)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.04 0.04
3137EAEZ8 FHLMC Note
0.250% Due 11/06/2023
1,155,000.00 11/03/2020
0.28%
1,153,960.50
1,154,965.86
99.51 5.13%
1,149,386.70
1,163.02
0.51%
(5,579.16)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.10 0.10
3135G06H1 FNMA Note
0.250% Due 11/27/2023
1,020,000.00 11/23/2020
0.29%
1,018,837.20
1,019,939.58
99.22 5.19%
1,012,073.58
878.33
0.45%
(7,866.00)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.16 0.16
3137EAFA2 FHLMC Note
0.250% Due 12/04/2023
825,000.00 12/02/2020
0.28%
824,183.25
824,952.26
99.11 5.27%
817,693.80
670.31
0.36%
(7,258.46)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.18 0.18
3130A3VC5 FHLB Note
2.250% Due 12/08/2023
1,000,000.00 02/13/2020
1.46%
1,029,240.00
1,001,427.37
99.31 5.92%
993,062.00
7,062.50
0.45%
(8,365.37)
Aaa / AA+
NR
0.19 0.19
3135G0V34 FNMA Note
2.500% Due 02/05/2024
600,000.00 01/30/2020
1.44%
624,768.00
602,145.66
98.95 5.55%
593,716.20
2,333.33
0.27%
(8,429.46)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.35 0.34
3130A7PH2 FHLB Note
1.875% Due 03/08/2024
1,000,000.00 03/03/2020
0.85%
1,040,350.00
1,004,379.28
98.40 5.59%
984,043.00
1,197.92
0.44%
(20,336.28)
Aaa / AA+
NR
0.44 0.43
3133ENKS8 FFCB Note
1.125% Due 01/06/2025
425,000.00 01/06/2022
1.20%
424,043.75
424,594.19
94.84 5.39%
403,076.38
1,128.91
0.18%
(21,517.81)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.27 1.22
3130AWER7 FHLB Note
4.625% Due 06/06/2025
1,000,000.00 06/13/2023
4.74%
997,830.00
998,154.60
99.18 5.14%
991,767.00
14,003.47
0.45%
(6,387.60)
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.68 1.58
3135G05X7 FNMA Note
0.375% Due 08/25/2025
1,000,000.00 03/07/2022
1.78%
953,120.00
974,301.17
91.47 5.14%
914,686.00
375.00
0.41%
(59,615.17)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.90 1.85
3133EPJX4 FFCB Note
3.625% Due 02/17/2026
1,000,000.00 05/15/2023
3.89%
993,250.00
994,168.32
96.88 5.03%
968,835.00
4,430.56
0.43%
(25,333.32)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.39 2.24
As of September 30, 2023
31 217
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3133EPHH1 FFCB Note
4.000% Due 04/28/2026
1,500,000.00 05/09/2023
3.90%
1,504,095.00
1,503,551.01
97.68 4.97%
1,465,143.00
25,500.00
0.66%
(38,408.01)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.58 2.37
3130ATUS4 FHLB Note
4.250% Due 12/10/2027
1,000,000.00 05/15/2023
3.66%
1,024,620.00
1,022,584.31
98.25 4.71%
982,534.00
13,104.17
0.44%
(40,050.31)
Aaa / AA+
NR
4.20 3.75
3130ATS57 FHLB Note
4.500% Due 03/10/2028
1,000,000.00 04/24/2023
3.76%
1,032,720.00
1,029,798.90
99.46 4.63%
994,618.00
2,625.00
0.44%
(35,180.90)
Aaa / AA+
NR
4.45 3.97
3130AWC24 FHLB Note
4.000% Due 06/09/2028
1,000,000.00 07/06/2023
4.49%
978,470.00
979,464.98
97.12 4.69%
971,177.00
13,333.33
0.44%
(8,287.98)
Aaa / AA+
NR
4.70 4.16
3130AWTR1 FHLB Note
4.375% Due 09/08/2028
1,250,000.00 09/07/2023
4.49%
1,243,625.00
1,243,705.25
98.56 4.70%
1,231,965.00
8,658.85
0.55%
(11,740.25)
Aaa / AA+
NR
4.95 4.36
TOTAL Agency 16,660,000.00 2.33%
16,723,621.65
16,663,086.43 4.79%
16,356,954.45
97,966.17
7.34%
(306,131.98)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.87 1.70
Cash
90PITT$00 City of Pittsburg Cash Equivalents
11,884,159.36 Various
0.00%
11,884,159.36
11,884,159.36
1.00 0.00%
11,884,159.36
0.00 5.30%
0.00 NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
90PITT$02 City of Pittsburg Additional Bonded Debt Funds
64,001,941.55 Various
0.00%
64,001,941.55
64,001,941.55
1.00 0.00%
64,007,280.53
0.00 28.53%
5,338.98
NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL Cash 75,886,100.91 0.00%
75,886,100.91
75,886,100.91 0.00%
75,891,439.89
0.00 33.83%
5,338.98
NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
CMO
3137BM7C4 FHLMC K051 A2
3.308% Due 09/25/2025
500,000.00 05/16/2022
2.96%
503,886.72
502,268.60
96.05 5.51%
480,258.50
1,378.33
0.21%
(22,010.10)
NR / NR
AAA
1.99 1.74
3137BNGT5 FHLMC K054 A2
2.745% Due 01/25/2026
1,000,000.00 02/15/2023
4.92%
949,570.31
960,283.60
94.47 5.41%
944,697.00
2,287.50
0.42%
(15,586.60)
NR / AAA
NR
2.32 2.06
3137BSP72 FHLMC K058 A2
2.653% Due 08/25/2026
710,000.00 11/29/2022
4.53%
664,903.91
675,116.25
93.06 5.27%
660,691.21
1,569.69
0.30%
(14,425.04)
NR / NR
AAA
2.90 2.68
3137BVZ82 FHLMC K063
3.430% Due 01/25/2027
500,000.00 12/05/2022
4.29%
484,082.03
487,206.51
94.62 5.26%
473,110.50
1,429.17
0.21%
(14,096.01)
NR / NR
AAA
3.32 2.93
3137F2LJ3 FHLMC K066 A2
3.117% Due 06/25/2027
1,000,000.00 05/10/2023
3.97%
969,218.75
972,113.60
93.06 5.24%
930,632.00
2,597.50
0.42%
(41,481.60)
NR / NR
AAA
3.74 3.31
3137FAWS3 FHLMC K067 A2
3.194% Due 07/25/2027
1,000,000.00 05/10/2023
3.95%
971,562.50
974,142.66
93.22 5.18%
932,174.00
2,661.67
0.42%
(41,968.66)
Aaa / NR
NR
3.82 3.45
3137FBU79 FHLMC K069 A2
3.187% Due 09/25/2027
750,000.00 06/09/2023
4.98%
714,902.34
717,348.40
92.91 5.22%
696,793.50
1,991.88
0.31%
(20,554.90)
NR / AAA
NR
3.99 3.53
As of September 30, 2023
32 218
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3137FETN0 FHLMC K073 A2
3.350% Due 01/25/2028
965,000.00 05/24/2023
4.34%
927,455.47
930,192.40
93.02 5.19%
897,689.32
538.79
0.40%
(32,503.08)
NR / NR
AAA
4.32 3.83
TOTAL CMO 6,425,000.00 4.29%
6,185,582.03
6,218,672.02 5.27%
6,016,046.03
14,454.53
2.69%
(202,625.99)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
3.38 3.01
Commercial Paper
62479LDC6 MUFG Bank Ltd Discount CP
5.630% Due 04/12/2024
2,000,000.00 08/15/2023
5.89%
1,924,933.33
1,939,321.11
96.97 5.89%
1,939,321.11
0.00 0.86%
0.00 P-1 / A-1
NR
0.53 0.52
89233GEP7 Toyota Motor Credit Discount CP
5.650% Due 05/23/2024
1,000,000.00 08/29/2023
5.92%
957,938.89
963,118.06
96.31 5.92%
963,118.06
0.00 0.43%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1
0.65 0.63
TOTAL Commercial Paper 3,000,000.00 5.90%
2,882,872.22
2,902,439.17 5.90%
2,902,439.17
0.00 1.29%
0.00 P-1 / A-1
F-1
0.57 0.56
Corporate
24422EVN6 John Deere Capital Corp Note
0.450% Due 01/17/2024
485,000.00 03/01/2021
0.47%
484,655.65
484,964.55
98.47 5.67%
477,586.29
448.63
0.21%
(7,378.26)
A2 / A
A+
0.30 0.29
91159HHG8 US Bancorp Callable Note Cont 12/29/2023
3.700% Due 01/30/2024
500,000.00 11/27/2019
2.03%
532,435.00
501,940.00
99.26 5.94%
496,282.50
3,134.72
0.22%
(5,657.50)
A3 / A
A
0.33 0.33
69371RR24 Paccar Financial Corp Note
0.350% Due 02/02/2024
225,000.00 01/28/2021
0.39%
224,739.00
224,970.44
98.21 5.74%
220,965.53
129.06
0.10%
(4,004.91)
A1 / A+
NR
0.34 0.33
637432NL5 National Rural Utilities Callable Note Cont 12/7/2023
2.950% Due 02/07/2024
500,000.00 04/06/2022
2.77%
501,470.00
500,161.99
98.98 5.86%
494,919.00
2,212.50
0.22%
(5,242.99)
A1 / AA+0.36
0.35 808513BN4 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 2/18/2024
0.750% Due 03/18/2024
725,000.00 Various
0.69%
726,181.50
725,152.12
97.61 6.02%
707,655.82
196.35
0.32%
(17,496.30)
A2 / AA0.47
0.45 023135BW5 Amazon.com Inc Note
0.450% Due 05/12/2024
750,000.00 Various
0.67%
745,836.00
748,981.07
96.90 5.63%
726,759.75
1,303.13
0.32%
(22,221.32)
A1 / AA
AA0.620.60
91324PEB4 United Health Group Inc Callable Note Cont 5/15/2022
0.550% Due 05/15/2024
250,000.00 11/08/2021
0.78%
248,565.00
249,644.77
96.85 5.75%
242,123.25
519.44
0.11%
(7,521.52)
A2 / A+
A
0.62 0.61
14913R2L0 Caterpillar Financial Service Note
0.450% Due 05/17/2024
715,000.00 05/10/2021
0.50%
714,041.90
714,799.81
96.87 5.57%
692,624.79
1,197.63
0.31%
(22,175.02)
A2 / A
A+
0.63 0.61
24422EVQ9 John Deere Capital Corp Note
0.450% Due 06/07/2024
425,000.00 06/07/2021
0.49%
424,468.75
424,878.49
96.69 5.43%
410,934.63
605.63
0.18%
(13,943.86)
A2 / A
A+
0.69 0.67
As of September 30, 2023
33 219
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
89114QCA4 Toronto Dominion Bank Note
2.650% Due 06/12/2024
750,000.00 04/23/2021
0.65%
796,327.50
760,344.58
97.71 6.03%
732,840.75
6,017.71
0.33%
(27,503.83)
A1 / A
AA0.700.67
06051GJY6 Bank of America Corp Callable Note Cont 6/14/2023
5.710% Due 06/14/2024
540,000.00 06/07/2021
5.75%
540,036.00
540,000.00
99.84 5.98%
539,154.36
1,456.05
0.24%
(845.64)
A1 / AAA0.71
0.20 89236TJH9 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
0.500% Due 06/18/2024
425,000.00 06/15/2021
0.54%
424,494.25
424,879.56
96.42 5.67%
409,784.15
607.99
0.18%
(15,095.41)
A1 / A+
A+
0.72 0.70
06367TQW3 Bank of Montreal Note
0.625% Due 07/09/2024
750,000.00 09/10/2021
0.65%
749,392.50
749,833.51
96.00 5.98%
720,018.75
1,067.71
0.32%
(29,814.76)
A2 / AAA0.78
0.75 79466LAG9 Salesforce.com Inc Callable Note Cont 7/15/2022
0.625% Due 07/15/2024
115,000.00 06/29/2021
0.64%
114,941.35
114,984.63
96.11 5.72%
110,528.00
151.74
0.05%
(4,456.63)
A2 / A+
NR
0.79 0.77
037833DM9 Apple Inc Callable Note Cont 8/11/2024
1.800% Due 09/11/2024
750,000.00 08/18/2021
0.58%
776,857.50
757,782.99
96.59 5.54%
724,421.25
750.00
0.32%
(33,361.74)
Aaa / AA+
NR
0.95 0.92
78015K7C2 Royal Bank of Canada Note
2.250% Due 11/01/2024
500,000.00 05/19/2021
0.73%
525,750.00
508,113.29
96.13 5.98%
480,647.50
4,687.50
0.22%
(27,465.79)
A1 / A
AA1.091.04
46647PBY1 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note Cont 2/16/2024
0.563% Due 02/16/2025
390,000.00 02/09/2021
0.56%
390,000.00
390,000.00
97.76 6.08%
381,279.21
274.46
0.17%
(8,720.79)
A1 / AAA1.38
1.31 57636QAN4 MasterCard Inc Callable Note 1x 02/03/2025
2.000% Due 03/03/2025
600,000.00 10/28/2021
1.04%
618,294.00
607,548.20
95.30 5.47%
571,815.60
933.33
0.26%
(35,732.60)
Aa3 / A+
NR
1.42 1.37
87612EBL9 Target Corp Callable Note Cont 4/15/25
2.250% Due 04/15/2025
500,000.00 02/17/2022
2.08%
502,465.00
501,171.81
95.29 5.48%
476,453.50
5,187.50
0.21%
(24,718.31)
A2 / A
A
1.54 1.47
437076CM2 Home Depot Callable Note Cont 3/15/2025
2.700% Due 04/15/2025
500,000.00 03/24/2022
2.76%
499,125.00
499,558.57
96.04 5.41%
480,218.00
6,225.00
0.22%
(19,340.57)
A2 / A
A
1.54 1.46
06406RBC0 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note Cont 3/25/2025
3.350% Due 04/25/2025
510,000.00 04/19/2022
3.35%
509,928.60
509,962.70
96.42 5.77%
491,749.65
7,403.50
0.22%
(18,213.05)
A1 / A
AA1.571.48
46647PCH7 JP Morgan Chase & Co Callable Note Cont 6/1/2024
0.824% Due 06/01/2025
600,000.00 05/24/2021
0.78%
600,777.60
600,173.11
96.27 6.23%
577,591.80
1,648.00
0.26%
(22,581.31)
A1 / AAA1.67
1.59 26442UAA2 Duke Energy Progress LLC Callable Note Cont 5/15/25
3.250% Due 08/15/2025
500,000.00 04/18/2022
3.21%
500,605.00
500,319.50
96.04 5.50%
480,194.00
2,076.39
0.21%
(20,125.50)
Aa3 / A
NR
1.88 1.78
57629WDK3 Mass Mutual Global funding Note
4.150% Due 08/26/2025
750,000.00 05/10/2023
4.74%
740,385.00
742,016.22
97.28 5.67%
729,582.00
3,026.04
0.33%
(12,434.22)
Aa3 / AA+
AA+
1.91 1.79
As of September 30, 2023
34 220
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
931142EW9 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.900% Due 09/09/2025
155,000.00 09/06/2022
3.92%
154,891.50
154,929.81
97.48 5.28%
151,092.92
369.42
0.07%
(3,836.89)
Aa2 / AA
AA
1.95 1.84
857477BR3 State Street Bank Callable Note Cont 2/6/2025
1.746% Due 02/06/2026
190,000.00 02/02/2022
1.75%
190,000.00
190,000.00
94.37 6.16%
179,293.88
506.83
0.08%
(10,706.12)
A1 / A
AA2.361.30
00440EAV9 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 2/3/2026
3.350% Due 05/03/2026
750,000.00 08/24/2023
5.19%
715,927.50
717,110.81
94.85 5.51%
711,379.50
10,329.17
0.32%
(5,731.31)
A3 / A
A
2.59 2.40
69371RR32 Paccar Financial Corp Note
1.100% Due 05/11/2026
600,000.00 02/10/2023
4.54%
538,422.00
550,352.09
89.98 5.25%
539,907.60
2,566.67
0.24%
(10,444.49)
A1 / A+
NR
2.61 2.50
89236TJK2 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
1.125% Due 06/18/2026
250,000.00 01/11/2023
4.55%
223,112.50
228,717.64
89.30 5.41%
223,245.00
804.69
0.10%
(5,472.64)
A1 / A+
A+
2.72 2.60
857477CD3 State Street Bank Callable Note 7/03/2026
5.272% Due 08/03/2026
350,000.00 07/31/2023
5.27%
350,000.00
350,000.00
99.06 5.63%
346,712.10
2,972.82
0.16%
(3,287.90)
A1 / A
AA2.842.58
06428CAA2 Bank Of America NA Callable Note cont 7/17/2026
5.526% Due 08/18/2026
500,000.00 08/24/2023
5.48%
500,680.00
500,658.71
99.51 5.71%
497,573.50
3,300.25
0.22%
(3,085.21)
Aa1 / A+
AA
2.88 2.61
438516BL9 Honeywell Intl Callable Note 08/01/2026
2.500% Due 11/01/2026
750,000.00 05/10/2023
3.96%
714,847.50
718,781.03
92.52 5.15%
693,928.50
7,812.50
0.31%
(24,852.53)
A2 / A
A
3.09 2.88
665859AW4 Northern Trust Company Callable Note Cont 4/10/2027
4.000% Due 05/10/2027
600,000.00 09/12/2022
4.08%
597,906.00
598,376.81
94.59 5.68%
567,557.40
9,400.00
0.26%
(30,819.41)
A2 / A+
A+
3.61 3.24
TOTAL Corporate 16,900,000.00 2.28%
16,877,559.10
16,791,108.81 5.70%
16,286,820.48
89,322.36
7.30%
(504,288.33)
A1 / A+
A+
1.43 1.32
Equity Mutual Fund
90PARS$00 City of Pittsburg PARS 115 Trust
2,991,253.78 Various
0.00%
2,991,253.78
2,991,253.78
0.95 0.00%
2,846,892.20
0.00 1.27%
(144,361.58)
NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL Equity Mutual Fund 2,991,253.78 0.00%
2,991,253.78
2,991,253.78 0.00%
2,846,892.20
0.00 1.27%
(144,361.58)
NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
Investment Pool
90PITT$01 City of Pittsburg Investment Pools
45,485,519.52 Various
0.00%
45,485,519.52
45,485,519.52
0.99 0.00%
44,862,719.92
0.00 20.00%
(622,799.60)
NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL Investment Pool 45,485,519.52 0.00%
45,485,519.52
45,485,519.52 0.00%
44,862,719.92
0.00 20.00%
(622,799.60)
NR / NR
NR
0.00 0.00
As of September 30, 2023
35 221
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
Money Market Fund
94975H296 Wells Fargo Treasury Plus MMFD 453
105,902.22 Various
5.21%
105,902.22
105,902.22
1.00 5.21%
105,902.22
0.00 0.05%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
94975H296 Wells Fargo Treasury Plus MMFD 453
25,901.44 Various
5.21%
25,901.44
25,901.44
1.00 5.21%
25,901.44
0.00 0.01%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
94975H296 Wells Fargo Treasury Plus MMFD 453
792,672.20 Various
5.21%
792,672.20
792,672.20
1.00 5.21%
792,672.20
0.00 0.35%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
94975H254 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund #743
419,966.43 Various
4.90%
419,966.43
419,966.43
1.00 4.90%
419,966.43
0.00 0.19%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
94975H254 Wells Fargo Money Market Fund #743
1,313,137.47 Various
4.90%
1,313,137.47
1,313,137.47
1.00 4.90%
1,313,137.47
0.00 0.59%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
TOTAL Money Market Fund 2,657,579.76 5.01%
2,657,579.76
2,657,579.76 5.01%
2,657,579.76
0.00 1.18%
0.00 Aaa / AAA
NR
0.00 0.00
Negotiable CD
96130ASC3 Westpac Banking Corp NY Yankee CD
5.380% Due 02/16/2024
2,000,000.00 02/22/2023
5.44%
1,998,772.63
1,999,528.20
99.86 5.56%
1,997,182.00
67,847.78
0.92%
(2,346.20)
P-1 / A-1+
F-1
0.38 0.37
21684XH82 Cooperative Rabobank UA Yankee CD
5.900% Due 09/06/2024
2,000,000.00 09/07/2023
5.90%
1,999,981.55
1,999,982.72
99.86 6.04%
1,997,130.00
7,866.67
0.89%
(2,852.72)
P-1 / A-1
F-1+
0.94 0.91
TOTAL Negotiable CD 4,000,000.00 5.67%
3,998,754.18
3,999,510.92 5.80%
3,994,312.00
75,714.45
1.81%
(5,198.92)
Aaa / AAA
AA+
0.65 0.64
Supranational
459058JM6 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note
0.250% Due 11/24/2023
925,000.00 Various
0.28%
924,231.25
924,962.40
99.22 5.50%
917,768.35
815.80
0.41%
(7,194.05)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.15 0.15
459058GQ0 Intl. Bank Recon & Development Note
2.500% Due 03/19/2024
750,000.00 01/26/2021
0.26%
802,455.00
757,781.28
98.56 5.65%
739,196.25
625.00
0.33%
(18,585.03)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.47 0.46
4581X0DZ8 Inter-American Dev Bank Note
0.500% Due 09/23/2024
895,000.00 09/15/2021
0.52%
894,337.70
894,783.66
95.14 5.67%
851,486.89
99.44 0.38%
(43,296.77)
Aaa / AAA
NR
0.98 0.95
4581X0EK0 Inter-American Dev Bank Note
4.500% Due 05/15/2026
750,000.00 06/27/2023
4.53%
749,422.50
749,470.63
98.87 4.96%
741,530.25
7,968.75
0.33%
(7,940.38)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
2.62 2.42
TOTAL Supranational 3,320,000.00 1.30%
3,370,446.45
3,326,997.97 5.45%
3,249,981.74
9,508.99
1.45%
(77,016.23)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
1.01 0.95
As of September 30, 2023
36 222
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
US Treasury
912797HA8 US Treasury Bill
5.185% Due 10/10/2023
1,100,000.00 06/13/2023
5.35%
1,081,305.19
1,098,574.12
99.87 5.35%
1,098,574.12
0.00 0.49%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.03 0.03
912797FA0 US Treasury Bill
4.970% Due 10/12/2023
2,000,000.00 05/09/2023
5.15%
1,957,202.78
1,996,962.78
99.85 5.15%
1,996,962.78
0.00 0.89%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.03 0.03
912797FC6 US Treasury Bill
4.800% Due 10/26/2023
1,175,000.00 04/26/2023
4.99%
1,146,486.67
1,171,083.33
99.67 4.99%
1,171,083.33
0.00 0.52%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.07 0.07
912828T91 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 10/31/2023
700,000.00 09/25/2019
1.60%
700,628.91
700,012.61
99.70 5.13%
697,923.80
4,760.19
0.31%
(2,088.81)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.08 0.08
912797FJ1 US Treasury Bill
4.940% Due 11/09/2023
2,000,000.00 05/09/2023
5.14%
1,950,051.11
1,989,296.67
99.46 5.14%
1,989,296.67
0.00 0.89%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.11 0.11
912797FK8 US Treasury Bill
5.010% Due 11/16/2023
2,200,000.00 05/16/2023
5.21%
2,144,277.67
2,185,916.33
99.36 5.21%
2,185,916.33
0.00 0.97%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.13 0.13
91282CBA8 US Treasury Note
0.125% Due 12/15/2023
1,000,000.00 01/08/2021
0.22%
997,148.44
999,799.75
98.95 5.22%
989,531.00
368.85
0.44%
(10,268.75)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.21 0.21
91282CBA8 US Treasury Note
0.125% Due 12/15/2023
2,000,000.00 05/26/2023
5.36%
1,944,843.75
1,979,107.48
98.95 5.22%
1,979,062.00
737.70
0.88%
(45.48)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.21 0.21
912797FV4 US Treasury Bill
5.245% Due 12/21/2023
2,300,000.00 08/15/2023
5.42%
2,257,442.65
2,272,857.12
98.82 5.42%
2,272,857.12
0.00 1.01%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.22 0.22
912797GN1 US Treasury Bill
5.276% Due 02/15/2024
2,000,000.00 08/15/2023
5.50%
1,946,653.78
1,959,843.78
97.99 5.50%
1,959,843.78
0.00 0.87%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.38 0.37
912796Z28 US Treasury Bill
5.338% Due 02/22/2024
1,000,000.00 08/25/2023
5.56%
973,609.03
978,650.00
97.87 5.56%
978,650.00
0.00 0.44%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.40 0.39
912796Z28 US Treasury Bill
5.296% Due 02/22/2024
325,000.00 09/26/2023
5.49%
317,923.96
318,115.20
97.88 5.49%
318,115.20
0.00 0.14%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.40 0.39
912797GQ4 US Treasury Bill
5.298% Due 03/07/2024
2,000,000.00 09/07/2023
5.52%
1,946,725.67
1,953,495.34
97.67 5.52%
1,953,495.34
0.00 0.87%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.44 0.42
91282CBV2 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 04/15/2024
1,000,000.00 04/14/2021
0.36%
1,000,351.56
1,000,063.19
97.32 5.48%
973,164.00
1,731.56
0.43%
(26,899.19)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.54 0.53
91282CCC3 US Treasury Note
0.250% Due 05/15/2024
650,000.00 05/12/2021
0.36%
647,968.75
649,578.52
96.81 5.51%
629,255.90
613.79
0.28%
(20,322.62)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.62 0.61
912828WJ5 US Treasury Note
2.500% Due 05/15/2024
1,400,000.00 08/30/2023
5.45%
1,371,726.56
1,375,123.76
98.21 5.45%
1,374,898.00
13,220.11
0.62%
(225.76)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.62 0.60
91282CCG4 US Treasury Note
0.250% Due 06/15/2024
1,000,000.00 06/28/2021
0.46%
993,750.00
998,509.70
96.41 5.49%
964,102.00
737.70
0.43%
(34,407.70)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.71 0.69
As of September 30, 2023
37 223
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CCL3 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 07/15/2024
1,000,000.00 08/05/2021
0.37%
1,000,273.44
1,000,073.32
96.10 5.48%
961,016.00
794.84
0.43%
(39,057.32)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.79 0.77
912797GK7 US Treasury Bill
5.072% Due 08/08/2024
2,000,000.00 08/15/2023
5.35%
1,899,113.61
1,912,076.67
95.60 5.35%
1,912,076.67
0.00 0.85%
0.00 P-1 / A-1+
F-1+
0.86 0.84
91282CCT6 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 08/15/2024
1,000,000.00 09/10/2021
0.42%
998,632.81
999,591.25
95.67 5.51%
956,719.00
478.94
0.43%
(42,872.25)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
0.88 0.85
91282CDB4 US Treasury Note
0.625% Due 10/15/2024
1,000,000.00 12/02/2021
0.86%
993,281.25
997,561.49
95.18 5.45%
951,797.00
2,885.93
0.43%
(45,764.49)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.04 1.01
91282CDH1 US Treasury Note
0.750% Due 11/15/2024
1,000,000.00 11/10/2021
0.80%
998,554.69
999,458.01
94.98 5.40%
949,844.00
2,832.88
0.42%
(49,614.01)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.13 1.09
91282CDN8 US Treasury Note
1.000% Due 12/15/2024
1,100,000.00 12/29/2021
0.99%
1,100,472.66
1,100,192.82
94.96 5.37%
1,044,527.00
3,245.90
0.47%
(55,665.82)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.21 1.17
912828ZC7 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 02/28/2025
1,000,000.00 02/03/2022
1.42%
991,054.69
995,878.77
94.39 5.28%
943,906.00
958.10
0.42%
(51,972.77)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.42 1.37
912828ZF0 US Treasury Note
0.500% Due 03/31/2025
750,000.00 03/03/2021
0.54%
748,886.72
749,590.75
93.18 5.29%
698,877.00
10.25 0.31%
(50,713.75)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.50 1.46
912828ZL7 US Treasury Note
0.375% Due 04/30/2025
500,000.00 01/13/2021
0.39%
499,609.38
499,856.17
92.71 5.23%
463,535.00
784.65
0.21%
(36,321.17)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.58 1.54
912828ZT0 US Treasury Note
0.250% Due 05/31/2025
1,250,000.00 10/06/2021
0.72%
1,228,759.77
1,240,304.76
92.21 5.19%
1,152,636.25
1,050.20
0.51%
(87,668.51)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
1.67 1.62
9128285C0 US Treasury Note
3.000% Due 09/30/2025
750,000.00 04/29/2022
2.90%
752,314.45
751,354.89
96.12 5.06%
720,908.25
61.48 0.32%
(30,446.64)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.00 1.91
9128285J5 US Treasury Note
3.000% Due 10/31/2025
1,000,000.00 06/02/2022
2.87%
1,004,023.44
1,002,457.33
96.02 5.03%
960,234.00
12,554.35
0.43%
(42,223.33)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.09 1.96
912828M56 US Treasury Note
2.250% Due 11/15/2025
1,000,000.00 08/25/2022
3.37%
966,093.75
977,645.50
94.48 5.02%
944,844.00
8,498.64
0.42%
(32,801.50)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.13 2.02
9128285T3 US Treasury Note
2.625% Due 12/31/2025
1,000,000.00 08/25/2022
3.34%
977,421.88
984,824.84
95.05 4.98%
950,469.00
6,633.83
0.43%
(34,355.84)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.25 2.13
9128286L9 US Treasury Note
2.250% Due 03/31/2026
1,000,000.00 08/29/2022
3.40%
961,640.63
973,274.45
93.84 4.90%
938,438.00
61.48 0.42%
(34,836.45)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
2.50 2.38
912828U24 US Treasury Note
2.000% Due 11/15/2026
1,500,000.00 05/09/2023
3.65%
1,418,964.84
1,428,045.82
91.98 4.79%
1,379,707.50
11,331.52
0.62%
(48,338.32)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
3.13 2.95
912828V98 US Treasury Note
2.250% Due 02/15/2027
1,000,000.00 11/29/2022
4.06%
930,585.94
944,351.41
92.28 4.75%
922,773.00
2,873.64
0.41%
(21,578.41)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
3.38 3.18
91282CEF4 US Treasury Note
2.500% Due 03/31/2027
1,100,000.00 11/03/2022
4.47%
1,014,148.44
1,031,820.62
92.89 4.73%
1,021,753.70
75.14 0.46%
(10,066.92)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
3.50 3.29
As of September 30, 2023
38 224
Holdings Report
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CEW7 US Treasury Note
3.250% Due 06/30/2027
1,250,000.00 11/03/2022
4.44%
1,187,792.97
1,199,912.17
95.01 4.72%
1,187,646.25
10,266.64
0.53%
(12,265.92)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
3.75 3.44
91282CFH9 US Treasury Note
3.125% Due 08/31/2027
800,000.00 01/30/2023
3.72%
779,968.75
782,868.01
94.38 4.71%
755,031.20
2,129.12
0.34%
(27,836.81)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
3.92 3.62
9128283F5 US Treasury Note
2.250% Due 11/15/2027
1,500,000.00 05/16/2023
3.59%
1,417,031.25
1,423,949.52
90.95 4.69%
1,364,179.50
12,747.96
0.61%
(59,770.02)
Aaa / AA+
AA+
4.13 3.83
TOTAL US Treasury 46,350,000.00 3.59%
45,246,721.84
45,622,078.25 5.21%
44,713,649.69
102,445.39
19.98%
(908,428.56)
Aaa / AAA
AAA
1.17 1.11
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 227,940,774.29 1.49%
226,546,927.88
226,795,441.25 2.38%
223,929,991.93
393,443.07
100.00%
(2,865,449.32)
Aa1 / AA+
AA+
0.65 0.58
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUALS 224,323,435.00
As of September 30, 2023
39 225
SECTION | Section 4 | Transactions
40 226
Transaction Ledger
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/DispYield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/03/2023 912797GH4 325,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.164% Due: 08/22/2023
99.283 5.27% 322,669.03 0.00 322,669.03 0.00
Purchase 07/03/2023 912797GH4 760,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.164% Due: 08/22/2023
99.283 5.27% 754,549.11 0.00 754,549.11 0.00
Purchase 07/06/2023 4581X0EK0 750,000.00 Inter-American Dev Bank Note
4.5% Due: 05/15/2026
99.923 4.53% 749,422.50 0.00 749,422.50 0.00
Purchase 07/10/2023 3130AWC24 1,000,000.00 FHLB Note
4% Due: 06/09/2028
97.847 4.49% 978,470.00 4,333.33 982,803.33 0.00
Purchase 07/18/2023 05592XAD2 135,000.00 BMW Vehicle Owner Trust 2023-A A3
5.47% Due: 02/25/2028
99.982 5.54% 134,976.08 0.00 134,976.08 0.00
Purchase 08/03/2023 857477CD3 350,000.00 State Street Bank Callable Note 7/03/2026
5.272% Due: 08/03/2026
100.000 5.27% 350,000.00 0.00 350,000.00 0.00
Purchase 08/16/2023 62479LDC6 2,000,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd Discount CP
5.63% Due: 04/12/2024
96.247 5.89% 1,924,933.33 0.00 1,924,933.33 0.00
Purchase 08/16/2023 912797FV4 2,300,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.245% Due: 12/21/2023
98.150 5.42% 2,257,442.65 0.00 2,257,442.65 0.00
Purchase 08/16/2023 912797GK7 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.072% Due: 08/08/2024
94.956 5.35% 1,899,113.61 0.00 1,899,113.61 0.00
Purchase 08/17/2023 912797GN1 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.276% Due: 02/15/2024
97.333 5.50% 1,946,653.78 0.00 1,946,653.78 0.00
Purchase 08/28/2023 00440EAV9 750,000.00 Chubb INA Holdings Inc Callable Note Cont 2/3/2026
3.35% Due: 05/03/2026
95.457 5.19% 715,927.50 8,026.04 723,953.54 0.00
Purchase 08/28/2023 06428CAA2 500,000.00 Bank Of America NA Callable Note cont 7/17/2026
5.526% Due: 08/18/2026
100.136 5.48% 500,680.00 767.50 501,447.50 0.00
Purchase 08/28/2023 912796Z28 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.338% Due: 02/22/2024
97.361 5.56% 973,609.03 0.00 973,609.03 0.00
Purchase 08/29/2023 89233GEP7 1,000,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Discount CP
5.65% Due: 05/23/2024
95.794 5.92% 957,938.89 0.00 957,938.89 0.00
Purchase 08/31/2023 912828WJ5 1,400,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due: 05/15/2024
97.980 5.45% 1,371,726.56 10,271.74 1,381,998.30 0.00
June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
41 227
Transaction Ledger
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/DispYield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Purchase 09/08/2023 21684XH82 2,000,000.00 Cooperative Rabobank UA Yankee CD
5.9% Due: 09/06/2024
99.999 5.90% 1,999,981.55 327.78 2,000,309.33 0.00
Purchase 09/08/2023 3130AWTR1 1,250,000.00 FHLB Note
4.375% Due: 09/08/2028
99.490 4.49% 1,243,625.00 5,164.93 1,248,789.93 0.00
Purchase 09/08/2023 912797GQ4 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.298% Due: 03/07/2024
97.336 5.52% 1,946,725.67 0.00 1,946,725.67 0.00
Purchase 09/27/2023 912796Z28 325,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.296% Due: 02/22/2024
97.823 5.49% 317,923.96 0.00 317,923.96 0.00
Subtotal 21,845,000.00 21,346,368.25 28,891.32 21,375,259.57 0.00 Security
Contribution
09/30/2023 90PARS$00 5,913.68 City of Pittsburg PARS 115 Trust 1.000 5,913.68 0.00 5,913.68 0.00 Subtotal 5,913.68 5,913.68 0.00 5,913.68 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 21,850,913.68 21,352,281.93 28,891.32 21,381,173.25 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Maturity 07/10/2023 3135G05G4 910,000.00 FNMA Note
0.25% Due: 07/10/2023
100.000 910,000.00 0.00 910,000.00 0.00
Maturity 07/14/2023 62479MUE1 1,500,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP
5.24% Due: 07/14/2023
96.332 1,500,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 0.00
Maturity 07/14/2023 89233HUE2 500,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Discount CP
5.17% Due: 07/14/2023
96.381 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00
Maturity 07/26/2023 313384JQ3 2,000,000.00 FHLB Discount Note
3.27% Due: 07/26/2023
100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 08/14/2023 3133EKZK5 1,000,000.00 FFCB Note
1.6% Due: 08/14/2023
100.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 08/14/2023 3133EL3V4 1,000,000.00 FFCB Note
0.2% Due: 08/14/2023
100.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 08/22/2023 89115BK66 1,000,000.00 Toronto Dominion Bank Yankee CD
4.02% Due: 08/22/2023
100.000 1,000,000.00 40,758.33 1,040,758.33 0.00
June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
42 228
Transaction Ledger
City of Pittsburg Total Consolidated - Account #10638
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/DispYield Amount Interest Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss Maturity 08/22/2023 912797GH4 325,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.164% Due: 08/22/2023
100.000 325,000.00 0.00 325,000.00 0.00
Maturity 08/22/2023 912797GH4 760,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.164% Due: 08/22/2023
100.000 760,000.00 0.00 760,000.00 0.00
Maturity 08/24/2023 3137EAEV7 1,040,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.25% Due: 08/24/2023
100.000 1,040,000.00 0.00 1,040,000.00 0.00
Maturity 08/29/2023 912797GJ0 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Bill
4.995% Due: 08/29/2023
100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/05/2023 912797GR2 2,000,000.00 US Treasury Bill
5.01% Due: 09/05/2023
100.000 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/06/2023 3130ATB71 1,200,000.00 FHLB Note
3.625% Due: 09/06/2023
100.000 1,200,000.00 0.00 1,200,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/08/2023 3130A3DL5 1,000,000.00 FHLB Note
2.375% Due: 09/08/2023
100.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/08/2023 3137EAEW5 1,210,000.00 FHLMC Note
0.25% Due: 09/08/2023
100.000 1,210,000.00 0.00 1,210,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/30/2023 912828T26 1,000,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due: 09/30/2023
100.000 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 18,445,000.00 18,445,000.00 40,758.33 18,485,758.33 0.00 Security
Withdrawal
09/30/2023 90PITT$01 9,514,480.48 City of Pittsburg Investment Pools 1.000 9,514,480.48 0.00 9,514,480.48 0.00 Subtotal 9,514,480.48 9,514,480.48 0.00 9,514,480.48 0.00 TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 27,959,480.48 27,959,480.48 40,758.33 28,000,238.81 0.00 June 30, 2023 through September 30, 2023
As of September 30, 2023
43 229
Important Disclosures
2023 Chandler Asset Management, Inc, An Independent Registered Investment Adviser.
Information contained herein is confidential. Prices are provided by ICE Data Services Inc (“IDS”), an independent pricing source. In the event IDS does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.
Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.
Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Source ICE Data Indices, LLC ("ICE"), used with permission. ICE permits use of the ICE indices and related data on an "as is" basis; ICE, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use, including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE data, its affiliates or their respective third party providers guarantee the quality, adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an "as is" basis and licensee's use it at licensee's own risk. ICE data, its affiliates and their respective third party do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend chandler asset management, or any of its products or services.
This report is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice. Any opinions or views expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change. This report may contain forecasts and forward-looking statements which are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicator of future results. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This report is not intended to constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice regarding any securities or investment strategy and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment.
Fixed income investments are subject to interest, credit and market risk. Interest rate risk: the value of fixed income investments will decline as interest rates rise. Credit risk: the possibility that the borrower may not be able to repay interest and principal. Low rated bonds generally have to pay higher interest rates to attract investors willing to take on greater risk. Market risk: the bond market in general could decline due to economic conditions, especially during periods of rising interest rates.
Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.
Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively.
Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.
As of September 30, 2023
44 230
Benchmark Disclosures
ICE BofA 1-3 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index
The ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies.
As of September 30, 2023
45 231
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement between the City of Pittsburg and TRC Solutions, Inc.
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City has a Consultant Agreement (Agreement) with TRC Solutions, Inc. (TRC) for environmental assessments and remediation planning services related to brownfield sites through the Brownfield Multipurpose Grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). The City will be conducting remediation activities and requires additional project activities like bidding assistance, field oversight during remediation construction, and grant reporting.
FISCAL IMPACT
If approved, the amendment to the Agreement (Amendment) would increase the Agreement compensation by $48,500. This cost is fully accounted for in the City’s $800,000 Brownfield Multipurpose Grant (Multipurpose Grant) and in the $534,437 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Equitable Communities Revitalization Grant (ECRG).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an Amendment to the Agreement with TRC.
BACKGROUND
The City's Environmental Services Division is responsible for fostering projects that promote public benefit and redevelopment of underutilized properties. As a historically heavy industrial City, there are several brownfields at which redevelopment would have the potential to alter the community in positive ways. Brownfields are properties at which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Environmental assessment and remediation of these properties foster brownfield redevelopment and revitalization. 232
In 2017, the City received a $300,000 Community-wide Brownfield Assessment Grant (Assessment Grant) from the US EPA for environmental assessments of existing brownfields. The City conducted a competitive selection process for soliciting a qualified environmental professional to conduct Assessment Grant activities, and of twelve responses, selected TRC due to related environmental experience, experience with the US EPA grant program, and familiarity with Pittsburg’s brownfields.
In addition to the assessment funding, on July 19, 2021, by Resolution 21-13970, the City accepted a Multipurpose Grant for $800,000 for the revitalization of Pittsburg’s brownfields, from environmental assessments to reuse planning, to clean-up planning, and remediation throughout the City. On August 1, 2021, the City executed the Agreement with TRC for remediation design. On June 19, 2023, by Resolution 23-14324, the City accepted $534,437 in ECRG funds for remediation of City-owned properties on East 3rd street: APNs 073-010-002, 073-010-003, 073-010-004, and 073-010-005 (collectively, the “Properties”).
The City will conduct remediation of the Properties with both Multipurpose Grant and ECRG funds commencing this winter.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
The item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.
STAFF ANALYSIS
re
For Project continuity, staff recommends expanding the existing Agreement with TRC to prepare bid specifications, provide field oversight during remediation construction, and conduct all required reporting for the Multipurpose Grant.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
First Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement Between the City of Pittsburg and TRC
Report Prepared By: Dhaynae Romero, Administrative Analyst I 233
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a )
First Amendment to the Consulting Services)
Agreement between the City of Pittsburg ) RESOLUTION NO. 23- And TRC Solutions, Inc. )
WHEREAS, the City of Pittsburg proposes to revitalize local brownfields to combat pollution, blight, stagnation, and other economic development hurdles associated with them; and
WHEREAS, on July 19, 2021, the City Council authorized the acceptance of a $800,000 Brownfield Multipurpose Grant (Multipurpose Grant) from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) for the revitalization of Pittsburg’s brownfields through activities like environmental assessments to reuse planning, to clean-up planning, and remediation; and
WHEREAS, on August 1, 2021, the City executed the Consultant Agreement (Agreement) with TRC Solutions, Inc. (TRC) for remediation design; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2023, the City accepted $534,437 in Department of Toxic Substances Control Equitable Communities Revitalization Grant (ECRG) funds for the remediation of four City-owned properties on East 3rd Street; and WHEREAS, the City will conduct remediation of the properties with both Multipurpose Grant and ECRG funds commencing this winter; and
WHEREAS, for project continuity, staff recommends expanding the existing Agreement with TRC to prepare bid specifications, provide field oversight during remediation construction, and conduct all required reporting for the Multipurpose Grant.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the Agreement with TRC, increasing the compensation under the Agreement by $48,500.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 20th day of November 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
234
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF PITTSBURG
AND TRC SOLUTIONS, INC.
This First Amendment to the Principal Agreement made and entered into on August 1, 2021, hereafter referred to as Agreement, between TRC Solutions, Inc., a California corporation, therein referred to as Consultant, and the City of Pittsburg, a municipal corporation, therein referred to as City, is made and entered into on this 20th day of November 2023.
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into an Agreement in August 2021 for the Consultant to provide site assessment and remediation design services under the City’s Multipurpose Grant issued by the US EPA for sites identified by the City; and WHEREAS, the Parties seek to amend the Agreement to add services and increase the compensation accordingly to implement the Project, and set forth hourly rates for 2024 NOW, THEREFORE, Consultant and City do mutually agree as follows:
1. Compensation. The first paragraph of Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed four hundred twentytwo thousand, five hundred dollars $(422,500), as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein for services to be performed and reimbursable expenses incurred under this Agreement. This dollar amount is not a guarantee that the City will pay that full amount to the Consultant but is merely a limit of potential City expenditures under this Agreement.
2. Exhibit A Scope of Services. Exhibit A of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the services set forth in Attachment 1 of this First Amendment.
3. Exhibit B Compensation Schedule. The rate schedule of Exhibit B of the Agreement is hereby amended to add 2024 rates set forth in Attachment 2 of this First Amendment.
4. Integration. This First Amendment contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to its subject matter and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this First Amendment.
This First Amendment shall not be amended or modified except by a written agreement executed by each of the parties. Except as specifically revised herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and Consultant shall perform all duties, obligations, and conditions required under the Agreement.
235
5. Inconsistencies. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this First Amendment and the Agreement, the provisions of this First Amendment shall control in all respects.
6. Ambiguities. The parties have each carefully reviewed this First Amendment and have agreed to each term of this First Amendment. No ambiguity shall be presumed to be construed against either party.
The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. 236
7. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed by the parties in one or more counterparts, all of which collectively shall constitute one document and agreement.
8. Authority. The person signing this First Amendment for Consultant hereby represents and warrants that he or she is fully authorized to sign this First Amendment on behalf of Consultant.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this First Amendment on the day and year first hereinabove appearing.
CONSULTANT:
TRC Solutions, Inc.
By:
Amy Wilson, PE, Vice President
CITY:
CITY OF PITTSBURG, a municipal
corporation of the State of California
By:
Garrett Evans, City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Donna Mooney, City Attorney
237
Attachment 1
SCOPE OF WORK
8. Prepare Bid Specifications
Consultant shall prepare summary information and a Bid Sheet listing the activities and bid units to be completed as described in the CAP, including, but not limited to, soil excavation, soil handling and disposal, placement of Oxygen Releasing Compounds (ORC) to promote biodegradation of hydrocarbons impacts to groundwater and site restoration activities. One draft and one final version of the Bid Sheet shall be provided. The Consultant shall assist with technical evaluation of the bids as requested by the City.
9. Field Oversight during Corrective Action
Consultant shall conduct a site kick-off with the selected contractor and observe soil excavation, loading, and off-haul completed by the City’s contractor. As part of this Task, Consultant shall collect confirmation soil samples from the limits of the lead and hydrocarbon excavations, as well as waste characterization samples of excavated soil if needed. Samples shall be submitted to a Statecertified laboratory for analysis on a rush 48-hour turnaround.
10.Reporting on US EPA Grants
Under guidance of City, Consultant shall prepare all quarterly and annual reports required by the City’s US EPA Multipurpose Grant.
238
COMPENSATION SCHEDULE Attachment 2
239
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 3021 – City Park Tree Safety Maintenance as Complete
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 3021 - City Park Tree Safety Maintenance (the “Project”), consisted of emergency removal and maintenance work to reduce stress on certain trees in City Park. This resolution will accept the contract as complete.
FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded by $63,700 from Fiscal Year 2021/22 Measure M Surplus, $30,000 from Fiscal Year 2022/23 General Fund Surplus and $150,000 of Fiscal Year 2022/23 Measure M funds allocated to Public Works.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Project 3021 - City Park Tree Safety Maintenance as complete.
BACKGROUND
On January 17, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14233, allocating funds to Project 3021 to continue maintenance practices and tree removals in City Park. Funds for the Project were expended for emergency tree maintenance, removals, and to address water-logged, failed trees and branches due to several substantial atmospheric river events.
On May 1, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14280, allocating additional funds to the Project for removing additional strained trees and performing substantial maintenance on other trees.
In March 2023, the City entered into an agreement with Hamilton Tree Service to perform emergency tree safety maintenance in City Park after falling branches caused damage to surrounding buildings and vehicles.
240
On August 8, 2023, Hamilton Tree Service completed all contracted maintenance and removals.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff hired a biologist from Nomad Ecology to perform a survey for nesting birds at City Park. All trees identified for removal were surveyed as well as adjacent trees. No active nests were observed. A total of 24 large Eucalyptus and Pine trees were removed, and safety maintenance pruning was performed on 41 other trees with heights reaching above 80-100 feet. A total of 31 replacement trees, better suited for the location, have been planted to replace the removed trees. The Project was completed on time and within budget.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Report Prepared By: Natasha Farmer, Administrative Analyst II 241
Resolution No. 23- Page 1 of 1 November 20, 2023
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Accepting Project 3021-City Park Tree ) RESOLUTION NO. 23- Safety Maintenance as Complete )
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14233, allocating funds to Project 3021 - City Park Tree Safety Maintenance to perform critical tree maintenance, removals, and to address water-logged, failed trees and branches throughout City Park after several atmospheric river events; and WHEREAS, on May 1, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14280, allocating additional funds to the project for removing additional strained trees and performing substantial maintenance on other trees; and
WHEREAS, in March 2023, the City entered into an agreement with Hamilton Tree Service to perform emergency tree safety maintenance in City Park; and WHEREAS, $243,700 from Project 3021 - City Park Tree Safety Maintenance was expended to support this project with a total project budget of $243,700; and WHEREAS, staff requests that the City Council accept the Project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby accepts Project 3021 — City Park Tree Safety Maintenance as complete.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 20th day of November 2023, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
242
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Approve a Contract with Dell Technologies, LLC for the refresh of the Public Safety Camera Servers at the Police Department
MEETING DATE: November 20, 2023
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Police Department is seeking City Council authorization to award a contract for the refresh of the Public Safety Camera Server infrastructure being used by the department.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for the server project will be drawn from Measure M surplus earmarked by the City Council at the May 9, 2022 City Council Budget Workshop and will not exceed $296,965.79.
RECOMMENDATION
City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing award of a contract with Dell Technologies, for the purchase of servers, storage, software, network items and other products in an amount not exceeding $296,965.79. This amount will be spent as follows:
Item Amount
Procurement of hardware & software items from Weaver
Technologies $ 281,997.19
Sales/Use Tax for the purchase (@ 9.25%) $ 14,968.60
Total : $ 296,965.79
BACKGROUND
The Police Department’s current Public Safety Camera Servers were procured in December 2014. At that time, the amount of projected storage was established from industry standard recommendations based on projected expansion and available technology. The servers allowed the City to live stream and memorialize public safety cameras which have proved vital as both an investigative tool as well as a strong deterrent of criminal activity. 243
As the value of this system came into focus, expansion quickly became a priority. With the growth of the public safety camera system so did the demand on the existing servers. IT staff has worked tirelessly to modify the existing storage to handle the demand of the citywide system. However, the City has recently reached a critical juncture where it has become clear that an overhaul of the existing servers is necessary in order to maintain reliable use of the current system as well as allow ample room for expansion into the future.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was presented and supported by the Public Safety Subcommittee on November 7, 2023.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Being aware of the performance and configuration issues with the existing Public Safety Camera Servers, the City’s IT team decided to conduct a technical audit of the existing servers through Dell, before procuring the replacement components. It was determined that a replacement of current servers was necessary. Through Dell Technologies, IT developed a server system which would triple the current storage and allow for a robust future expansion of the new server system to keep up with technology growth and demands.
The new server system will allow for a more responsive and reliable system which will extend the current video retention rate from an average of 30-60 days to 300 plus storage days. It will also allow for a more efficient processing / writing speed which will provide better reliability in recording retention capabilities.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Exhibit A Dell Technologies Server Quote
Report Prepared By: Steve Albanese, Chief of Police
244
A quote for your consideration
Based on your business needs, we put the following quote together to help with your purchase decision. Below is a detailed summary of the quote we’ve created to help you with your purchase decision.
To proceed with this quote, you may respond to this email, order online through your Premier page, or, if you do not have Premier, use this Quote to Order.
Quote No. 3000164519844.1
Total $296,965.79
Customer # 11660119
Quoted On Oct. 20, 2023
Expires by Nov. 19, 2023
Contract Name Dell NASPO Computer
Equipment PA - California
Contract Code C000000181156
Customer Agreement # MNWNC-108 / 7-15-70-34-
003
Solution ID 18299631.15
Deal ID 26145753
Sales Rep Brandi Williams
Phone (800) 456-3355, 6180439
Email [email protected]
Billing To ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
CITY OF PITTSBURG
65 CIVIC AVE
FINANCE DEPT
PITTSBURG, CA 94565-3814
Message from your Sales Rep
Please contact your Dell sales representative if you have any questions or when you are ready to place an order.
Thank you for shopping with Dell!
Regards,
Brandi Williams
Shipping Group
Shipping To
JITENDRA KANERIA
CITY OF PITTSBURG
65 CIVIC AVE
PITTSBURG, CA 94565-3814
(925) 252-4852
Shipping Method
Standard Delivery
Install At
CITY OF PITTSBURG
Solution Name:
16TB A300 | Video | 5yr MC+
Product Unit Price Quantity Subtotal
PowerScale A300 Promo $36,866.27 4 $147,465.08
PowerScale Chassis - AMER $2,778.67 1 $2,778.67