CITY OF PITTSBURG
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 05, 2024
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
65 CIVIC AVENUE, PITTSBURG, CA
SPECIAL MEETING
PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS
5:30 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL
PITTSBURG ARTS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY
SOUTHWEST PITTSBURG GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT II
SUCCESSOR AGENCY
PRESIDING
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor/Chair
Jelani Killings, Vice- Mayor/Chair
Dionne Adams, Council Member/Board Member
Angelica Lopez, Council Member/Board Member
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Council Member/Board Member
FOR HOUSING AUTHORITY:
S.L. Floyd, Housing Authority Member
Annie Hill Herring, Housing Authority Member
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pittsburg City Council regular meetings are held the first and third Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. The Housing Authority meets in conjunction with the City Council on the third Monday of each month. The Pittsburg City Council meets regularly in the Council Chamber at 65 Civic Avenue, unless otherwise noted above. The City Council also sits as the Board of Directors of several other City agencies. The stipends for all agency members conform to state statutes governing compensation amounts.
All other Agencies meet on an as needed basis and will be listed above if applicable. Copies of the open session agenda packets, which are distributed to the City Council, are on file in the office of the City Clerk, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California, and are available for public inspection, beginning 72 hours in advance, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except from noon to 1:00 p.m. and City holidays). The agenda and reports are also located on the City’s website at www.pittsburgca.gov. Additionally, if any reports or documents, which are public records, are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours before the meeting, those reports and documents will also be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office and on the day of the meeting in the Council Chamber at the public counter area below the dais. 1 5:30 PM - SPECIAL MEETING FOR PLANNING COMMISSION INTERVIEWS
1. Planning Commission Interviews
7:00 PM - CONVENE IN OPEN SESSION FOR REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRESENTATIONS
2. New Employee Introduction
PROCLAMATIONS
3. Black History Month
CITY MANAGER REPORTS/REMARKS
The City Manager may make brief announcements or informal comments at this time and brief the Council on items of interest. (No Action Required)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the audience who wish to address the City Council or Agency Boards on issues that are not scheduled for the agenda and on any items listed as part of the Consent Calendar should complete a Speaker's Card available at the dais. Please read the card carefully in order to fill out the card properly.
Submit the completed card to the City Clerk before the item is called, preferably before the meeting begins. Individuals will be given three minutes to address the Council unless additional time is allowed as provided for spokespersons. Prior to speaking, each member of the public shall state their name and business and City of residence in a clear and audible tone of voice. (No Action Required)
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Council Members may make a report on their committee assignments at this time. (see attached list of adhoc committees and other public agencies in which Council members participate). (No Action Required)
PUBLIC HEARING
4. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment and Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD)
This is a public hearing on a request to adopt a resolution approving: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision. This public hearing also includes a request to introduce and waive first reading of an ordinance approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD- 1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 2 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to single-family units for the Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17). The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district.
Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
City Council/Agency Members may make any conflict of interest declarations pertaining to Consent Calendar items at this time.
COMBINED CITY COUNCIL, PITTSBURG ARTS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION,
PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY, SOUTHWEST PITTSBURG GHAD II AND
SUCCESSOR AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR
5. Minutes of December 18, 2023 and January 16, 2024
6. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2241 - East Leland Road Pavement Maintenance as Complete and Authorize the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion
Project 2241-East Leland Road Pavement Maintenance (the “Project”) facilitated pavement rehabilitation on East Leland Road. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
7. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2033 - Loveridge Road Maintenance Project as Complete and Authorize the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion
Project 2033-Loveridge Road Maintenance Project (the “Project”) facilitated pavement rehabilitation on Loveridge Road. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.
8. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Extension of an Agreement with Darktrace for 4 more years for their Detect & Respond System for Citywide Usage
The City Manager recommends the extension of the existing agreement between the City of Pittsburg and Darktrace to subscribe to their DETECT & RESPOND systems for usage by all City departments for a period of 4 more years.
9. Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Accept Grant Funds from Keller Canyon Mitigation Fund for FY 23/24 Recreation Programs
The City of Pittsburg has been awarded grants totaling $40,500 supporting recreation programs at the Buchanan Swim Center and the Senior Community Center. Staff is requesting adoption of a resolution to accept the grants and allocate the funds to the FY 2023-24 Recreation budget. 3 10. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing Execution of a General Services Agreement with Western Train Company for Train Replacement and Carousel Repairs
The City of Pittsburg Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance and repair of amusement rides at Small World Park. If approved, the resolution will authorize execution of a general services agreement with Western Train for an amount not to exceed $295,000, for replacing the train, upgrading the braking system, and repairing the carousel.
11. Adoption of Two Ordinances for the Objective Design Standards 2023 Project: 1) Adding Article XXI to Chapter 18.84 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code; and 2) Amending the Zoning Map for Certain Multi-family Housing and Mixed-use Development Projects to Further Housing Production Consistent with State Law On October 2, 2023, the City Council held a public hearing on a City-initiated request for adoption of two Ordinances for the Objective Design Standards 2023 Project: 1) adding Article XXI to Chapter 18.84 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code; and 2) amending the Zoning Map for certain multi-family housing and mixed-use development projects to further housing production consistent with state law. The City Council introduced and waived further reading of two Ordinances approving the Objective Design Standards 2023 Project. This item has been continued from the November 6, 2023, the November 20, 2023, and the December 18, 2023, City Council hearings. The Ordinance is now ready for City Council adoption.
COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Members may request items to be considered for future agendas. An item will only be brought forward with a majority vote and will appear on a future agenda with staff recommendations for further Council consideration.
COUNCIL MEMBER REMARKS
Council Members may make brief announcements or informal comments at this time. (No Action Required) ADJOURNMENT TO FEBRUARY 20, 2024
4 NOTICE TO PUBLIC
GENERAL INFORMATION
Copies of the open session agenda packets, as distributed to the City Council, are on file in the office of the City Clerk, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California, and are available for public inspection, beginning 72 hours in advance, during normal business hours (8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except City holidays). Full agenda packets are also located on the City’s website at www.pittsburgca.gov. If any reports or documents, which are public records, are distributed to the City Council less than 72 hours before the meeting, those reports or documents will be available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office and on the day of the meeting in the Council Chamber at the public counter area below the dais.
SPEAKER’S CARD
Members of the audience who wish to address the City Council on issues that are not scheduled for the agenda and on any items listed as part of the agenda should complete a Speaker’s Card available at the dais. Please read the card carefully in order to fill out the card properly. Submit the completed card to the City Clerk before the item is called, preferably before the meeting begins. Individuals will be given up to three minutes to address the Council unless additional time is allowed as provided for spokespersons. Speakers are not permitted to yield their time to another speaker. Prior to speaking, each member of the public shall state their name and business and City of residence in a clear and audible tone of voice. Pursuant to the Brown Act, no action may be taken by the City Council on items not already scheduled on the agenda; however, the City Council may refer your comments/concerns to staff or request that the item be placed on a future agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Persons who wish to speak on Public Hearings listed on the agenda will be heard when the Public Hearing is opened, except on Public Hearing items previously heard and closed to public comment. After the public has commented, the item is closed to public comment and brought to the Council/Agency level for discussion and action. Further comment from the audience will not be received unless requested by the Council/Agency.
There is a 90-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders which require a hearing by law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6). Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but not limited to Government Code Section 65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing. The City Council may be requested to reconsider a decision if the request is made prior to the next City Council meeting, regardless of whether it is a regular or special meeting.
NOTICE TO THE DISABLED AND VISUALLY OR HEARING IMPAIRED In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Pittsburg will provide special assistance for disabled residents. Upon request, an agenda for any meeting shall be made available in appropriate alternative formats. The Council Chamber is equipped with sound amplifier units for use by the hearing impaired. The units operate in conjunction with the Chamber’s sound system. You may request the sound amplifier from the City Clerk for personal use during Council meetings. If you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, or are requesting a specially formatted agenda, please contact the City Clerk at (925) 252-4850. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting or provide the requested agenda format. (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
DISRUPTIVE CONDUCT
The Council requests that you observe the order and decorum of our Council Chamber by turning off or setting to vibrate all cellular telephones and electronic devices, and that you refrain from making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks. Boisterous and disruptive behavior while the Council is in session, and the display of signs in a manner which violates the rights of others or prevents others from watching or fully participating in the Council meeting, is a violation of our Municipal Code and any person who engages in such conduct can be ordered to leave the Council Chamber by the Mayor.
LIVE MEDIA BROADCASTING ADVISEMENT
City Council meetings are webcast live on the City’s website at www.pittsburgca.gov on the Agendas and Live Meetings page. Past meetings and approved minutes are also archived on that webpage. Watch the live meeting via the City’s webcast (www.pittsburgca.gov - Agendas and Live Meetings), on Comcast Channel 24 Delta TV, AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 Delta TV. Contact the City Clerk’s office at (925) 252-4850 for more information 5 City Council Agency/Liaison/Subcommittee Assignments as of January 5, 2024
OUTSIDE AGENCY BOARDS COUNCIL MEMBER(S) TYPE MEETS TIME STAFF ABAG Dionne Adams / Jelani Killings Alternate Standing Annual G. Evans Delta Diablo* Juan Banales / Shanelle Scales-Preston Alternate Standing 2nd Wednesday 4:30 PM J. Samuelson East Co. Co. County Habitat Conservancy Angelica Lopez / Juan Banales Alternate Standing 4th Monday Bi-Monthly 2:00 PM J. Davis East County Water Management Juan Banales / Jelani Killings Alternate Standing Annual J. Samuelson MCE Clean Energy Board Shanelle Scales-Preston / Angelica Lopez Alternate Standing Quarterly 7:00 PM D. Buchanan TRANSPLAN / ECCRFFA Shanelle Scales-Preston / Juan Banales Alternate Standing 2nd Thursday 6:30 PM J. Samuelson Tri-Delta Transit (2 reps)** Shanelle Scales-Preston & Dionne Adams / Jelani Killings Alternate Standing 4th Wednesday 4:00 PM J. Samuelson
LIAISON TO COUNCIL MEMBER(S) TYPE MEETS TIME STAFF
East Bay League of California Cities Shanelle Scales-Preston / Jelani Killings Alternate Standing 3rd Thursday G. Evans Los Medanos Health Advisory Committee Shanelle Scales-Preston & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc As needed M. Aliotti Mayor’s Conference Juan Banales & Jelani Killings Alternate Standing 1st Thursday 6:30 PM G. Evans Pittsburg Police Activities League (PAL) Shanelle Scales-Preston & Angelica Lopez / Dionne Adams Alternate Standing Monthly S. Albanese School Districts Committee (2x2) Jelani Killings & Angelica Lopez / Dionne Adams Alternate Standing Quarterly M. Aliotti
SUBCOMMITTEES COUNCIL MEMBER(S) TYPE MEETS TIME STAFF
Budget Sustainability Juan Banales & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc As needed G. Evans Community and Economic Development Jelani Killings & Dionne Adams / Juan Banales Alternate Standing TBD J. Davis Finance Management Juan Banales & Jelani Killings / Shanelle Scales-Preston Alternate Standing 3rd Friday 4:00 PM P. Rodrigues Government Performance Juan Banales & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc 4th Friday 4:00 PM J. Brizel Infrastructure and Transportation Shanelle Scales-Preston & Dionne Adams / Juan Banales Alternate Standing 3rd Friday 1:30 PM J. Samuelson Life Enrichment Dionne Adams & Angelica Lopez / Shanelle Scales-Preston Alternate Standing 3rd Wednesday 5:30 PM K. Simonton Pittsburg Arts and Community Foundation Shanelle Scales-Preston & Jelani Killings Standing As needed K. Simonton Public Safety Shanelle Scales-Preston & Angelica Lopez / Jelani Killings Alternate Standing 1st Wednesday 5:30 PM S. Albanese Tobacco, Cannabis, Alcohol Policy Review Shanelle Scales-Preston & Jelani Killings Ad Hoc As needed G. Evans *Stipend of $170 per month
** Stipend of $100 per month
6 7
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment and Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP,
PD/RZ, SUBD)
MEETING DATE: February 5, 2024
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is a public hearing on a request to adopt a resolution approving: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment to change the land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision. This public hearing also includes a request to introduce and waive first reading of an ordinance approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to single-family units for the Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17). The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071.
FISCAL IMPACT
One-time revenues related to construction permits and other development fees and exactions are anticipated with this proposal. There is no impact to the General Fund if this project is approved.
8 RECOMMENDATION
City Council open the public hearing; take public comment; close the public hearing and take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving a General Plan Map amendment, Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision; and
2. Introduce, waive further reading, and pass to second reading, an ordinance (Attachment 2) approving an amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District.
Please note: A condition of approval for the project has been included making approval of the Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision contingent upon City Council adoption of the ordinance approving the amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District.
BACKGROUND
On July 21, 2021, West Coast Home Builders, Inc., filed Planning Application No. AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD), requesting: 1) an Amendment to the General Plan Map to change the land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi- family units to single-family units, 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision (Siena at San Marco); to subdivide the project site into 206 individual lots for single-family residences, and 4) Design Review of landscape and architectural plans to construct residences at Siena at San Marco.
On July 27, 2023, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the project.
Following public testimony and deliberations, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10226 (Attachment 3), recommending the City Council adopt an ordinance and resolution to approve the Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), subject to conditions.
The project as previously reviewed by the Planning Commission on July 27, 2023, included a request for design review, which was included in the recommendation by the Planning Commission. However, the applicant has requested this portion of the application be withheld from consideration at this time to allow the applicant to revise the architecture and landscape plans. Once resubmitted, staff will return to the Planning Commission and City Council, as appropriate, for consideration and review
Existing Conditions: Village C (62.52 acres) and Village O (25.90 acres) are vacant and undeveloped and bisected by West Leland Rd; Village C is on the north side of West Leland Road and Village O is on the south side of West Leland Road. Surrounding land uses are primarily residential, vacant rangeland and open space. 9 The project site is comprised of an approximately 48-acre portion of Village C (Unit 17) and an approximately 10-acre portion of Village O (Unit 16). The remaining 15-acre portion of Village C, while currently vacant, is slated for future development of San Marco Villas (Phase III – 270 multifamily units).
The project site (Units 16 and 17) consists of gently rolling hills and some leveled areas.
Elevations within the Unit 17 portion of the project site range from 300 to 460 feet above mean sea level and there is a notable large hill in the central part of Unit 17 with a transmission tower and corridor through the middle of the site. Elevations within the Unit 16 portion of the project site range from 350 to 440 feet above mean sea level with a low area in the western portion of Unit 16, with the surrounding hill gently sloping toward the low area. The transmission line corridor through the project site houses two parallel Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) electrical transmission lines (230 and 115 kilovolt [kV]).
The project site is approximately one and one-half-mile from the Pittsburg/Bay Point Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station and is within a quarter mile of Tri Delta Transit Route 200 bus stops located near the intersection of West Leland Road and San Marco Boulevard.
See Photos of the Project Site in Attachment 4.
Surrounding Land Uses
Village C (~48 acres)
North: Agricultural-Natural Resources Trust parcel (5 acres) (constructed detention basin), State Highway 4
West: Avila Road RV & Boat Storage, Spilker, LLC property (vacant) South: West Leland Road and Units 11 and 12 (Positano)
East: Future San Marco Villas III (~15 acres of Village C) – 270 multifamily units, Existing San Marco Villas I and II (Village B – 462 multifamily units) Village O (~10 acres)
North: West Leland Road
West: Existing residential subdivision known as Positano (Village L) South: Residential Subdivision known as Positano (Village L) East: Eastern portion (~16 acres) of Village O (vacant) See Map of Surrounding Land Uses in Attachment 5.
Proposed Project: The proposed project, if approved, would allow for the development of 181 single-family units on an approximately 48-acre portion of Village C (Unit 17) and 25 single-family units within all approximately 10 acres of Village O (Unit 16).
Village C. The San Marco Development Plan originally planned for 339 multifamily units (townhouse apartments) to be built in Village C. To date, 270 of the 339 multifamily units have been approved (San Marco Villas III), but not yet constructed which leaves 69 units remaining in Village C. The applicant proposes to transfer 112 units into Village C (98 units from Village M, nine units from Village B, and five units from Village O), which would increase the unit count in Village C to 181 total. All 181 units were planned as multifamily units under the original San Marco Development Plan. The proposed project, if approved, would map and construct all 181 units as single-family units instead of multifamily units. 10 Village O. The San Marco Development Plan originally planned for 291 multifamily units (townhouse apartments) to be built in Village O. To date, none of those units have been approved or constructed. The applicant proposes to convert 25 units within Village O from multifamily units to single family units.
Taken together, Units 16 and 17 (the Siena Subdivision – 206 total single family units) would be constructed on an approximately 58-acre portion of the larger San Marco site; 25 units on a 10-acre portion of Village O and 181 units on a 48-acre portion of Village C.
Project Entitlements.
Three approvals are requested for this project: 1) a General Plan Map Amendment, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362), and 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision. Each approval is discussed in detail below.
1. General Plan Map Amendment
The proposed General Plan Map Amendment, if approved, would change the current land use designation of the project site from High-Density Residential and Open Space, which allows construction to a maximum of 25 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), to Low Density Residential and Open Space which allows for the construction of a maximum of 7 du/ac.
See Exhibit A of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the proposed General Plan Map Amendment.
2. San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment):
The proposed amendment to the Development Plan and PD-1362 District (Ordinance No. 12-1362), if approved, would:
a. Reassign 98 units from multifamily Village M, nine (9) units from multifamily Village B, and five (5) units from multifamily Village O to single family Village C; and b. Convert 25 units from multifamily Village O to single family units in Village O.
See Exhibit A of Attachment 2 (Ordinance) for the proposed Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District.
3. Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision:
The proposed Major Subdivision, if approved, would subdivide the approximately 58-acre project site into 206, single-family residential lots. The proposed lot sizes range from 3,402 sq. ft. (minimum) to 16,375 sq. ft. (maximum) in Unit 16 and 3,375 sq. ft. (minimum) to 26,560 sq. ft. (maximum) in Unit 17. See discussion below for Vesting Tentative Map project development and design regarding access, open space, off-street parking, bicycle facilities, and infrastructure and utilities.
Access:
Vehicular access to Unit 17 would be from Siena Village Drive. Messina Circle, Livorno Drive, and Brindisi Drive would serve lots in the northern portion and Casina Circle, 11 Giovanni Drive, Catania Court, Lucca Lane, and Pesara Lane would serve lots in the southern portion of Unit 17. Vehicular access Unit 16 would be from Street A. Street B would serve lots in the eastern portion of Unit 16.
All streets throughout the proposed subdivision would be public streets*. Six-foot-wide sidewalks on both sides of the street are required.
Proposed roadway widths are listed below:
Siena Village Drive: 40-ft. – 52-ft.
Giovanni Drive: 40-ft.
Casina and Messina Circles: 36-ft.
Brindisi and Livorno Drives: 36-ft.
Lucca and Pesaro Lanes**: 30-ft.
Catania Court: 30-ft.
Streets A and B: 36-ft.
*Lucca and Pesaro Lanes on the west side of Unit 17 would be private access easements, not public streets, and therefore do not include sidewalks. **Note: Pursuant to California Vehicle Code section 22500.1 and California Fire Code section 503.3, roadways less than 36-ft. wide shall have NO PARKING-FIRE LANE signs posted, allowing for parking on one side only or curbs painted red with the words NO PARKING - FIRE LANE clearly marked. This requirement will apply to Catania Court and both Lucca and Pesaro Lanes.
Open Space:
Unit 17
There are 11 open space lots of varying sizes throughout Unit 17; Parcels A (49,207 sq. ft.), B (406,631 sq. ft.) and J (222,321 sq. ft.) would be designated open space devoted to Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD). Parcel C would be a 2,888-sq. ft. pocket park, Parcel D (1,132 sq. ft.) would be devoted to Emergency Vehicle Access, Parcels E (668 sq. ft.), F (1,093 sq. ft.), G (2,468 sq. ft.) and H (4,366 sq. ft.) would be common area landscaping, Parcel I (1,924 sq. ft.) would be drainage maintenance access and Parcel K would be a 20,314-sq. ft. dog park. Parcels L and M are located across West Leland Road from Unit 17 and would be designated open space. Parcel N indicates a future West Leland Road.
Unit 16
There are four open space lots of varying sizes throughout Unit 16: Parcel A would be a pump station (5,079 sq. ft.), Parcels B (15,363 sq. ft.), C (6,443 sq. ft.) and D would be designated open space devoted to Geological Hazard Abatement District (GHAD).
Frontage improvements to West Leland Road and Santa Teresa Drive (curb, gutter and sidewalk) have already been provided by the applicant.
Infrastructure/Utilities:
Water
Based on a water supply analysis conducted by West Yost, dated July 27, 2022, the proposed subdivision is not anticipated to change the storage or pumping capacity findings 12 or recommendations included in the City’s 2015 Water System Master Plan or the City’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Further, the additional water demand due to the Project’s land use changes represents only a 0.1 percent increase in the City’s projected future maximum day and peak hour demands. Thus, the additional water demand is not anticipated to trigger the need for additional pipeline improvements.
Sewer
The City and the Delta Diablo Sanitation District would provide sewer services. The sewer master plan for the overall San Marco Development was previously reviewed and approved by the City, which has always showed the proposed sewers for Unit 17 be conveyed thru San Marco Villas and eventually discharged into San Marco Boulevard. The proposed sewer design and layout is consistent with the previously City approved master plan.
Stormwater
The Contra Costa County Flood Control District has previously reviewed and approved the San Marco Drainage Study which included the proposed project site.
Provisions regulating stormwater management and discharge control in Chapter 13.28 PMC, require effective February 15, 2005, implementation of appropriate source control and site design measures and stormwater treatment measures for projects that create or replace one acre or more of impervious surface, and that effective August 15, 2006, reduce the threshold to projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface.
These provisions do not apply to the proposed project because the Southwest Development Agreement for the San Marco Development occurred on April 3, 1990 (Ordinance No. 90- 990), prior to implementation of stormwater management and C3 requirements adopted in February 2005.
Additionally, the applicant is not proposing more impervious surface than what was already approved under the current adopted San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362.
Stormwater from the project will not be treated on-site. Rather, it will flow through street drains and existing infrastructure along W Leland Road to the existing C3 basin near the corner of San Marco Boulevard and W Leland Road approximately between one-quarter and one-half mile from Unit 16 and 17 residences.
A condition of approval will require the applicant to evaluate the existing, receiving storm and sewer facilities for adequate capacity and provide the results to the City to identify any service or supply problems. If any service or supply problems arise, the applicant agrees to cover the cost for installation of additional facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the proposed project.
See Exhibit B of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the proposed Major Subdivision 9550 and Vesting Tentative Map.
See Exhibit C of Attachment 1 (Resolution) for the proposed Conditions of Approval. 13 GENERAL PLAN/CODE COMPLIANCE:
Pittsburg General Plan 2020
The project site is located within the larger San Marco Development area which is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement (DA) originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993.
The DA was subsequently amended on October 1, 2001, in Ordinance No. 01-1187, on July 19, 2010, in Ordinance No. 10-1326, on April 15, 2013, in Ordinance No. 13-1369 and on December 21, 2020, in Ordinance No. 20-1481.
The DA locked in the land use regulations at the time it was originally adopted. At the time the DA and PD plan were adopted, they were determined to be consistent with the applicable General Plan (1988).
The project site is located within the San Marco Development area in the Southwest Hills subarea of the General Plan and is currently designated a mixture of High-Density Residential and Open Space. The High-Density Residential designation is intended to provide sites for residential densities ranging from 14 to 25 units per acre. The proposed Low Density Residential designation is intended to provide sites for residential densities ranging from 1 to 7 units per acre.
The proposed project is a single-family development with a density of 3.57 units per acre which is inconsistent with the existing General Plan land use designation for the project site.
To address this inconsistency, the applicant is requesting the parcel be redesignated to Low Density Residential. If the proposed General Plan Amendment is approved, the maximum density for the project site would be reduced from 25 units per acre to 7 units per acre, which would allow for a maximum of 404 units on the 57.73-acre project site. The applicant is proposing a total of 206 units on the project site, which is less than the maximum that would be allowed.
Zoning/Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District (Zoning Map Amendment) The current zoning for the site is PD-1362 (Planned Development District, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District, and the site is regulated by the conditions of approval set forth in the ordinance establishing the PD District. As previously discussed, the proposed project falls within the area designated as Villages C and O in the San Marco Development Plan area.
The requested PD District amendment would amend the current San Marco Development Plan to: 1) modify the land use table to transfer 98 units from multifamily Village M, nine (9) units from multifamily Village B, and five (5) units from multifamily Village O to single family Village C, and 2) convert 25 units from multifamily Village O to single family units in Village O.
The proposed transfer would not increase the total number of residential units (2,938) approved for construction within the San Marco Development area, pursuant to the provisions of the existing DA.
14 Pursuant to PMC section 18.62.070, amendments to adopted PD Districts are processed in the same manner as zoning map amendments.
Inclusionary Housing Requirements
Development of the project site (Villages C and O) was envisioned in and is consistent with the current San Marco Development Plan. The San Marco Development Plan was determined to be consistent with the applicable General Plan (1988) at the time it was approved. The proposed project is exempt from Inclusionary Housing requirements in Chapter 18.86 PMC adopted in 2004 because the project is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement. The terms of the San Marco Development Agreement expressly prohibit the application of new City rules, regulations and policies that come into effect after July 1, 1993. As such, the current proposal is exempt and not subject to the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (ECCC HCP/NCCP)
The City joined the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association as a member agency with the adoption of City Council Resolution No. 00-9196 on June 19, 2000. On April 16, 2007, the City established procedures to implement the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (ECCC HCP/NCCP) in PMC Chapter 15.108 (Ordinance No. 07-1293).
PMC section 15.108.030 (Applicability) describes development projects which are exempt from the City’s HCP provisions. PMC section 15.108.030(A)(4) specifically exempts “Development projects with vested rights as established by California law including Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869 (development agreements) and Sections 66498.1 through 66498.9 (vesting tentative maps) where such rights vested prior to adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter.”
The San Marco Development falls within this exemption given execution of the Southwest Development Agreement for the San Marco Development occurred on April 3, 1990 (Ordinance No. 90-990), prior to implementation of HCP requirements and procedures adopted in 2007.
Required Finding – General Plan Map Amendment: In order to adopt a general plan amendment, the City Council must determine, in accordance with Government Code section 65358, that the amendment would be in the public interest.
Required Findings – Zoning Map Amendment: In order to approve zoning changes, the City Council must determine, in accordance with PMC section 18.48.030, that:
A. the change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan and applicable specific plan; B. in the case of a base district, overlay district or general land use regulation, the change proposed is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is proposed; C. a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and 15 D. its adoption would be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice.
Required Findings – Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision: In order to approve a Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision, the City Council must determine, in accordance with PMC section 17.20.060(c), that:
A. the proposed map is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provision of PMC;
B. the site is physically suitable for the type of development; C. the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; D. the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements would not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat;
E. the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements would not cause serious public health problems; and
F. the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements would not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.
A full analysis of how the proposed project meets the required General Plan Map amendment and Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision findings is provided in Section 2 (Findings) of the Resolution (Attachment 1). A full analysis of how the proposed project meets the required findings for an Amendment to an adopted PD Plan is provided in Section 2 (Findings) of the Ordinance (Attachment 2).
Environmental Review: On January 19, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93- 7888 certifying a Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the entire, 639- acre, 2,938-unit project currently known as the San Marco Development (State Clearinghouse No. 1991073029).
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) provides that the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declaration (ND) if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (listed below) calling for preparation of a Subsequent EIR or ND have occurred.
1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 16 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, or the ND was adopted shows any of the following:
A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or ND.
B. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or ND.
C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
D. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or ND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162, subd. (a); see also Pub. Resources Code, Section 21166).
City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the SEIR for the San Marco Subdivision remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional documentation may be required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.).
There are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project or the circumstances in which the proposed project would be undertaken that would require major revisions of the prior certified SEIR. The proposed project does not require preparation of a new subsequent or supplemental EIR due to: 1) the involvement of new significant environmental effects, (2) a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects, or (3) new information of substantial importance. No mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, nor has the Siena at San Marco proponent declined to adopt any additional mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. Rather, all the impacts associated with the Modified Project are within the envelope of impacts addressed in the prior certified SEIR. Applicable mitigation measures from the prior certified SEIR are identified and discussed in the Addendum and are also recommended for adoption as Conditions of Approval. Based on the discussion in this analysis and in the Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an Addendum provides the required documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
See Attachment 6 for a link to the CEQA Addendum.
Public Notice: On or before Friday, November 10, 2023, in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A, B and D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the November 20, 2023, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times; was posted at City Hall and at or near the project site; was delivered for posting at the Pittsburg Library; was posted on the “Public Notices” section of the City’s website and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, 17 to the property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice. In addition, a copy of the notice was posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”) and was sent directly to all subscribed residents in the “Avila,” “San Marco” and “San Marco Villas” neighborhoods.
See Attachment 7 for the Public Hearing Notice.
SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.
STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff believes that the City Council can make the required findings to approve of the requested General Plan Map Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision. The staff-recommended findings are provided in Section 2 (Findings) of Attachment 1 (Resolution) and Attachment 2 (Ordinance) and summarized below.
There is a community need for the proposed amendments and requested approvals. The proposed amendments and requested approvals would conform with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. Currently, the entire San Marco Development area is designated for exclusively residential use in the approved PD Plan. The proposed amendments and requested approvals would not increase the total number of units already envisioned for the San Marco Development rather, would increase the number of small-lot, single-family units in the project, thereby increasing opportunities for homeownership for entry-level buyers in the community. The proposed amendments and requested approvals would also place an increased number of residences in the San Marco development area closer to the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station.
The proposed project is consistent with many of the goals and policies contained within the 2020 General Plan. For instance, the proposed project will: provide low-density, single- family residential in the Southwest Hills subarea (Goal 2-G-4), provide a dog park as a community amenity (Policy 2-P-6), utilize a PD zoning to achieve a high-quality design outcome (Policy 2-P-5), pay its share of the costs for the construction of facilities needed to serve the development (Policy 3-P-1, 3-P-13, and 7-P-2), include a Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive.
Additionally, there is no new information identifying new significant effects, nor is there an increase in the severity of previously identified impacts related to development of the project site. The conclusions from the prior certified SEIR remain unchanged when considering implementation of the proposed project.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution
a. Exhibit A – General Plan Map Amendment
b. Exhibit B – Vesting Tentative Map for Major Subdivision c. Exhibit C – Conditions of Approval
d. Exhibit D – Addendum Appendix G
18 2. Ordinance
a. Exhibit A – Amendment to San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 Plan
3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 10226
4. Photos of Project Site
5. Map of Surrounding Uses
6. CEQA Addendum
7. Public Hearing Notice
Prepared by: Alison Hodgkin, Associate Planner
19 Resolution No.24- Page 1 of 8 February 5, 2024
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:
Approving a General Plan Map Amendment, )
Vesting Tentative Map for a Major )
Subdivision for the “Siena ) RESOLUTION NO. 24-
at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units )
16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD) )
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2021, West Coast Home Builders, Inc., filed Planning Application No. AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD), requesting: 1) an Amendment to the General Plan Map to change the land use designation of the project site from High Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space, 2) an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District to transfer a total of 112 units from other villages into Village C and convert a total of 206 multi-family units to single-family units, and 3) a Vesting Tentative Map for a 206-lot Major Subdivision (Siena at San Marco); to subdivide the project site into 206 individual lots for single-family residences at Siena at San Marco.
The project site is located immediately south of the Willow Pass Road interchange on State Route 4, near the westernmost edge of Pittsburg city limits in the PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) district. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 091-050-072 and portion of 091-050-071; and
WHEREAS, the project site is located within the larger San Marco Development area which is subject to the San Marco Development Agreement (DA) originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, as subsequently amended. The project site is regulated by the conditions of approval set forth in the PD-1362 (Planned Development District, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and
WHEREAS, a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified in accordance with CEQA to examine the potential environmental effects of the original project (Final EIR for the San Marco Subdivision). The Pittsburg City Council certified the Final SEIR in Resolution No. 93-7888 on January 19, 1993, making the required findings under CEQA (State Clearinghouse No. 91073029). An Addendum to the certified Final SEIR has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 to address the proposed project (Siena at San Marco Units 16 and 17). The Addendum must be considered by the City Council with Planning Application No. AP-21- 1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD); and
WHEREAS, under Government Code section 65358, the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, may amend the City’s General Plan, in whole or in part, if it finds that the amendment would be in the public interest. No more than four general plan amendments to each required element may be adopted within one calendar year. In this calendar year so far, the City Council has adopted two amendments to the General Plan Land Use Element; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC section 17.20.060(c), the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, may approve a tentative map if it finds that:
20 Resolution No.24- Page 2 of 8 February 5, 2024
a) the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provision of the PMC; b) the site is physically suitable for the type of development; c) the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; d) the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; e) the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements will not cause serious health problems; and f) the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to PMC section 18.36.230, the City Council, upon recommendation of the Planning Commission, may grant design review approval if it finds that: a) the structure conforms with good taste, good design and in general contributes to the character and image of the City as a place of beauty, spaciousness, balance, taste, fitness, broad vistas, and high quality; b the structure will be protected against exterior and interior noise, vibrations and other factors that may tend to make the environment less desirable; c) the exterior design and appearance of the structure is not of inferior quality as to cause the nature of the neighborhood to materially depreciate in appearance and value; d) the structure is in harmony with proposed developments on land in the general area; and e) the application conforms with the criteria set forth in any applicable City adopted design guidelines; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10226, recommending approval of requested General Plan Map amendment, amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District, Vesting Tentative Map and Design Review; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to Friday, January 26, 2024, in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A - D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the February 5, 2024, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times; was posted at City Hall; was delivered for posting at the Pittsburg Library; and was mailed via first class or electronic mail to the applicant, to the property owner, to owners of property located within 300 feet of the proposed project site, to local service agencies whose services might be affected by this project, and to individuals who had previously filed written request for such notice; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2024, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing to: 1) introduce and waive further reading of an ordinance approving the proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District; and 2) adopt this resolution approving the General Plan Map amendment and Vesting Tentative Map, at which time oral and/or written testimony was considered.
21 Resolution No.24- Page 3 of 8 February 5, 2024
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby approves the following:
Section 1. Authority
A. Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution confers on cities the authority to regulate land use within their jurisdictions under the police power and to make and enforce ordinances to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Aesthetic reasons alone justify exercise of the police power (Metromedia, Inc. vs. City of San Diego [1980] 264 C3d 848, 164 CR 510).
B. The General Plan is the single most important planning document and represents the most comprehensive statement of the city’s interests and welfare (Government Code section 65300; Citizens of Goleta Valley vs.
Board of Supervisors [1990] 52 CA3d 553, 276 CR 410). In general, all land use decisions must be consistent with the general plan. Consistency exists between a city’s land use action and the general plan when a city has officially adopted such a plan, and the various land uses approved are compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the plan (Lesher Communications, Inc. vs. City of Walnut Creek [1990] 52 C3d 531, 277 CR1).
C. The Subdivision Map Act (Government Code section 66410, et seq.) vests in cities the power to regulate and control the design and improvement of subdivisions within their boundaries (Government Code section 66411). “Improvement” is broadly defined to include any specific improvement or type of improvement, the installation of which is necessary to ensure consistency with the general plan (Government Code section 66419[b]).
D. A city may not approve a tentative map unless it finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions of its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan (Government Code section 66473.5).
Section 2. Findings
A. Based on the City Council staff report entitled, “Amending the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12- 1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD),” dated February 5, 2024, and based on all the information contained in the Planning Division files on the project, incorporated herein by reference and available for review in the Planning Division located at 65 Civic Avenue in Pittsburg, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the public hearing, the City Council finds that:
1. All recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.
22 Resolution No.24- Page 4 of 8 February 5, 2024
2. City staff prepared an Addendum for the proposed project to determine whether and to what extent the Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the San Marco
Development area remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed project, or whether additional
documentation may be required under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code [PRC] §§ 21000, et seq.). Based on the analysis in the
Addendum, staff determined that preparation of a supplemental or Subsequent EIR or ND was not required and that an
Addendum provides the required documentation under CEQA for the proposed project.
General Plan Map Amendment:
3. The proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District is subject to the San Marco DA originally approved by the City Council on July 1, 1993, which was found to be consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the 1988 General Plan. Though the proposed amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 District is not subject to the 2020 General Plan, it is consistent with many of the goals and policies contained within the current document, and is therefore in the public interest, in that:
a. The proposed project will provide low-density, single-family residential in the Southwest Hills subarea (Goal 2-G-4). b. The proposed project will provide a dog park as a
community amenity (Policy 2-P-6).
c. The proposed project will utilize a Planned Development (PD) zoning to achieve a high-quality design outcome
(Policy 2-P-5).
d. The proposed project will pay its share of the costs for the construction of facilities needed to serve the development (Policy 3-P-1, 3-P-13, and 7-P-2). The proposed project will comply with conditions of approval requiring payment of the Facilities Reserve Charge, Local Traffic Mitigation Fee (LTMF), and Regional Transportation Development
Impact Mitigation Fee (RT-DIM) in accordance with the
Pittsburg Municipal Code. The proposed project will
promote the public health, safety, and general welfare in that it requires the Developer to pay fees to finance unmet 23 Resolution No.24- Page 5 of 8 February 5, 2024
local and regional traffic improvement needs and annex
the site into the City’s Community Facilities District (CFD) 2007-1 for park maintenance and the City’s CFD 2017-1
for fire facilities and fire safety and emergency services. e. The proposed project will be built in an area where public facilities and infrastructure are already available (Policy 3- P-1). A condition of approval will require the applicant to evaluate the existing, receiving storm and sewer facilities for adequate capacity and provide the results to the city to identify any service or supply problems. If any service or supply problems arise, the applicant agrees to cover the cost for installation of additional facilities required to be constructed to accommodate the proposed project.
f. The existing transportation system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed project (Policy 3-P-2).
Residents of the proposed project will have multiple
transportation options available to them as the site is located near BART, Tri-Delta Transit, and bicycle lanes. g. The proposed project will provide safe and contiguous routes for pedestrians and bicyclists (Policy 3-P-17, 7-P- 34, and 7-P-40) in that a Class IV bicycle facility along West Leland Road from Villa Drive to Santa Teresa Drive is required as part of this project.
h. The proposed project will include bicycle racks in each garage for secure bicycle parking (Policy 7-P-45).
i. The Developer will equitably share the costs associated with providing water and wastewater services to the
proposed project through payment of the Pittsburg
Facilities Reserve Charge (Policy 11-P-7 and 11-P-18).
j. The proposed project will include window assembly
upgrades for upper-floor windows of Unit 17 residences
nearest to State Route 4 to ensure interior noise levels do not exceed 45 dB CNEL. The proposed project will also
include sound walls for Unit 17 residences nearest to State Route 4 and West Leland Road to ensure exterior noise
levels do not exceed 65 dB CNEL (Policy 12-P-6).
k. The proposed project will comply with conditions of
approval requiring construction of quality home designs to ensure future residents will enjoy an attractive living environment (Housing Goal G-5 and Policy P-5.1).
24 Resolution No.24- Page 6 of 8 February 5, 2024
Vesting Tentative Map:
4. The Vesting Tentative Map for the proposed 206-unit, Major Subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential, as described in Section 2.A.3 above.
5. The project site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed in that the site is vacant, that all project construction will occur at elevations below the major ridgelines within the southern hills, and the site is surrounded by existing infrastructure, minimizing the amount of work and investment needed to extend utilities and services to the site.
6. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, in that the site is surrounded by existing single- and multi- family, residential development. Further, the site is located within one and one-half mile of the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station, less than a quarter- mile of two existing bus routes, a quarter-mile from the future San Marco Commercial Center and is adjacent to single- and multi-family homes, making it an appropriate location for residential low-density development.
7. The design of the proposed subdivision and accompanying improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, if the project is required to comply with conditions of approval in Exhibit D and all applicable mitigation measures and conditions of approval as outlined in Exhibit D Attachment 4 - Appendix G of the “Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the San Marco Development Plan (for Siena at San Marco, Units 16 and 17),” dated May 5, 2023.
8. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements proposed will not cause serious public health problems, in that the project site is not listed on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List and conditions of approval will require all site improvements comply with all local, City, State and federal regulations.
9. The design of the subdivision and type of improvements proposed will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, in that there are no existing public access easements on the site. The proposed map does include a new public street that will connect the development to existing public roadways, and the new street will be of sufficient width to accommodate automobile and emergency vehicle access into and around the site.
25 Resolution No.24- Page 7 of 8 February 5, 2024
B. The City Council Staff Report entitled, “Adoption of a Resolution Approving a General Plan Map Amendment and Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Approving an Amendment to the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District for Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision (Units 16 and 17), AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD),” dated February 5, 2024, is referenced hereto as additional support for findings.
Section 3. Decision
Based on the findings and the authority set forth above, the City Council hereby takes the following actions:
A. Amends General Plan Figure 2-2 (Land Use Diagram) to change the land use designation of the project site, from High Density Residential and Open Space to Low Density Residential and Open Space as substantially presented in Exhibit A of this resolution;
B. Modifies other Land Use Element tables and charts as necessary to reflect the change in land use acreages and maintain internal consistency with the General Plan document;
C. Approves Vesting Tentative Map 9554 (Exhibit B) subdividing the project site into 206 lots for detached single-family homes, subject to the conditions as substantially presented in Exhibit D of this resolution; and Section 4. Effective Date of General Plan Map Amendment The General Plan Map Amendment approved by this resolution shall become effective immediately.
Section 5. Effective Date of Vesting Tentative Map for Major Subdivision The Major Subdivision and Design Review approved by this resolution shall become effective on the effective date of the applicable ordinance amending the San Marco Development Plan and PD-1362 (Planned Development, Ordinance No. 12-1362) District.
26 Resolution No.24- Page 8 of 8 February 5, 2024
Section 6. Adoption
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 5th day of February 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAINED:
ABSENT:
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
27 MAY 3, 2023
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE
SIENA AT SAN MARCO
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT
PITTSBURG, CA
NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit A - General Plan Map Amendment, Siena at San Marco Residential Subdivision, AP-21-1584 (GP, PD/RZ, SUBD, DR) 28 MAY 3, 2023
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
OPEN SPACE
PARK
SIENA AT SAN MARCO
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT
PITTSBURG, CA
NOT TO SCALE
29 326
74479.0755989.13
440.48
341
75840.8757575.57
297.91
329.5
326.7 270.7
269.7
266.5
298.8
287.7
283.8
280.8
277.8
297.6
297.5
292.5
291.6
287.6
286.4
282.6
282.6
277.6
277.6
272.7
267.6
262.6
290.7
290.4
289.1
274.3
285.3
320.6
319.6
318.6
319.3
320.4
320.9 320.3
303.7
300.5
264.7
262.6
261.6
260.6
260.7
260.3
260.5
260.2
311.6
311.7
310.6
310.5
309.7
309.6
308.5
308.6
308.4
307.5
307.6
306.5
306.5
305.5
306.5
304.5
304.7
304.3
303.6
302.5
302.6
301.4
301.5
300.8
300.5
298.7
299.5
297.4
297.7
295.8
295.6
294.8
293.9
298.6
296.7
296.7
294.8
294.6
293.8
293.9
292.7
292.7
291.8
291.6
292.2
293.5
292.6
293.7
290.4
290.7
251.8
251.3
250.7
248.8
252.3
252.5
252.3
271.5
271.8
274.7
274.7
277.7
277.4
278.7
254.6
255.6
256.5
258.6
255.6
253.4
292.5
286.6
287.6
295.7
292.5
278.4279.4
387.7
387.7
387.8
387.9
334.9
341.8
334.8
331.7
328.7
326.5
324.4 325.3
330.6
390.3
390.7
302.6
302.5
307.5
307.5
312.6
312.5
317.5
317.7
322.6
322.7
327.6
327.6
332.7
332.5
337.6
464.4
466.3
465.2
276.7
276.3
276.3
274.7
274.5
274.7
274.5
274.2
274.3
274.2
274.1
274.2
274.3
274.2
274.3
273.7
274.1
273.7
312.6
312.5
313.5
314.5315.6
316.5
317.7
318.4
319.5
452.7
452.6
451.6
377.5
381.5
387.5
387.5
392.5
392.6
397.4
397.5
401.7
331.3
332.8
331.6
334.8
333.8
329.5
331.6
330.6
330.4
331.3
333.3
330.6
336.6
333.6
335.6
337.8
335.3
334.5
339.5
338.5
338.8
336.1
337.6
339.6
340.5
341.6
344.8
344.9
341.7
342.4
373.6
373.4
367.3
365.3
353.6
355.8
355.8
357.8
358.6
358.7
466.7
371.6
372.5
374.8
365.3
365.3
440.8
437.7
434.6
432.7
429.7
426.8
423.7
419.7
415.7
413.8
417.6
421.5
423.4
424.8
424.7
429.6
432.7
432.9
433.5
417.5
415.5
413.6
411.7
409.7
408.5
406.5
404.6
435.7
431.7
428.7
425.5
422.5 420.5
417.5
415.6
412.6
410.6
408.6
404.6
408.5
405.6
402.5
399.5
401.6
390
405
410
385
380
375
365
360
355
350
335
335
340
340
350
365
370
370
375
375
380
385
385
390
390
395
400
370
365
335
410
420
425
435
455
355
330
330
320
315
315
310
310
310
305
305
305
310
315
320
300
295
295
295
320
290
290
290
285
275
270
290
290
285
285
275
270 265
330
365
335
400405
410
415420425
435
445
450
455
465
475
480485
490
430
405
400
390
425
395
400
370
345
340
415
335
345
345
350
355
355
360
360
365
380395
330
365
405
415
430
440445450
355
330
325
325
325
320
320
315
305
300
300
300
295
285
280
280
280
265
275
280
280
275
275
260
255
255
250
325
355
360
390
270
345
280
410
405
400
415
430
440
460
470
425
420
390
255
DENSE TREES DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DIRT PILE
DIRT PILE
POOL
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
POOL
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
DENSE TREES
SCATTERED BRUSH
DELTA DE ANZA REGIONAL TRAIL
STATE ROUTE 4
VILLA DRIVE
W LELAND ROAD
VILLA TERRACE DRIVE
LA COSTA DRIVE
LA PAZ DRIVE
RIO SECO DRIVE
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
SCATTERED BRUSH
GROUND NOT VISIBLE
GROUND NOT VISIBLE
391.7
391.6
392.6
392.8
385 380
375
370
365 360
390
391.2
393.4
285.4
393.6
393.8
393.7
394.6
395.3
394.4
SCATTERED BRUSH
270
325
325
320
315
320
315
310
310
330
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
430
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
430
435
355
360
365
370
375
380
385
390
395
400
405
410
415
420
425
325
330
325
375
370
365
360
320
315
310
305
319
318
317
316
314
313
312
311
309
308
307
306
304
303
395
390
385
380
375
370
365
360
355
350
345
340
335
VILLA DRIVE
WEST LELAND ROAD
VILLAGE
SIENA
DRIVE
MESSINA CIRCLE
MESSINA CIRCLE
LIVORNO DRIVE
MESSINA CIRCLE
GIOVANNI DRIVE
PARCEL B
(GHAD)
PARCEL A
(GHAD)
PARCEL J
(GHAD)
LUCCA LANE
{\T0.85;PESARO LANE}
Δ
21 22
23 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
VILLA TERRACE DRIVE
7 6
27 26
25 24
23 19
20 21
22 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
Δ
UNIT 17
UNIT 16
5 4
3 2
1 103
102
101
100
99 98
300
390
385
380
375
370
365
360
355
350
330
340
350
360
370
380
390
345
360
350
340
330
320
310
335
330
325
330
330
N
STREET A
STREET B
1 2 3
4 5
6 8
9 10
11 12
13 14151618
1719
20 21
22 23
24 25
PARCEL B
(GHAD)
PARCEL D
(GHAD)
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 1516
17 18
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56 57 58 59
60 61
62 63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126127128129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151 152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
19 {PARCEL K
(DOG PARK)}
Δ
Δ
PARCEL L
PARCEL M
PARCEL N
VESTING TENTATIVE MAP
{\LLOCATION MAP}
SCALE: 1"=100'
CURB RAMP
RETAINING WALL
CENTER LINE
RIGHT OF WAY
LOT LINE
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
STREET LIGHT
STORM DRAIN
SANITARY SEWER
POTABLE WATER
STORM WATER INLET
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
WATER VALVE
FENCE
CURB & GUTTER
EASEMENT LINE
%%UPROPOSED %%UDESCRIPTION %%UEXISTING
LEGEND
130 CONTOUR ELEVATIONS
EX FC
SPOT ELEVATION 525.2x 525.2
SIDEWALK/WALKWAY
8"SS EX 12"SS
130
EX 12"W12"W
12"SD EX 12"SD
%%uABBREVIATIONS
AB AGGREGATE BASE
AC ASPHALT CONCRETE
BW BOTTOM OF WALL
CL CENTER LINE
DI DROP INLET
DW DOMESTIC WATER
EVAE EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
EX EXISTING
FC FACE OF CURB
FG FINISHED GRADE
FH FIRE HYDRANT
FL FLOW LINE
GB GRADE BREAK
GHAD GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT
HP HIGH POINT
INV INVERT ELEVATION
LP LOW POINT
MAX MAXIMUM
MIN MINIMUM
P PAD ELEVATION
PAE PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT
PAV PAVEMENT
PL PROPERTY LINE
PAE PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT
PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
RW RIGHT OF WAY
SD STORM DRAIN
SS SANITARY SEWER
SSE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
SL STREET LIGHT
STD STANDARD
SWK SIDEWALK
SSE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
TC TOP OF CURB
TG TOP OF GRATE
TRW TOP OF RETAINING WALL
TW TOP OF WALL
TYP TYPICAL
W WATER LINE
WLE WATER LINE EASEMENT
FOR: WEST COAST HOME BUILDERS, INC
MARCOSAN
4 %%UVICINITY MAP%%U
NOT TO SCALE
N
{PROJECT
SITE}
1. OWNER/DEVELOPER: WEST COAST HOME BUILDERS, INC
4021 PORT CHICAGO HIGHWAY CONCORD, CA 94520