Pittsburg City Council
November 18, 2024

2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study Fee Recommended Adjustments The 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study determined there is a need to adjust the Mitigation Fees (Development Fee [and the associated Rural Road Fee, and Temporary Impact Fee] and the Wetland Mitigation Fee [and the associated Temporary Impact Fee]) based on the recent updated data.

Development Fee
Excerpted from the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, Table E.2 provides the recommended adjustments to the Development Fee. The proposed adjustment is a 1.2 percent increase to the current fee schedule.

Wetland Mitigation Fee
Excerpted from the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, Table E.3 provides the recommended adjustments to the Wetland Mitigation Fee. The Wetland Mitigation Fees for all wetland land cover types and streams are proposed to increase between 0.4 percent and 2.5 percent compared to the current fee schedule.

Determining Fee Amounts
The Conservancy, participating cities (Brentwood, Clayton, Oakley, Pittsburg) and the County (“Co-Permittees”) have the responsibility and authority to adjust the fees in effect for their jurisdictions. The role of the Conservancy is to conduct the periodic fee audits, determine fees to be charged to Participating Special Entities1, and refer the results of the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study to the Co-Permittees.

1 Organizations not subject to the jurisdiction of the Permittees may have projects or ongoing activities within the inventory area that could affect covered species and that may require take authorization. These agencies, known as Participating Special Entities, can request coverage under the HCP/NCCP directly with the Conservancy. 168
Agenda Item 7

Based on information presented in the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, staff recommends Development Fee and Wetland Mitigation Fee amounts set forth in the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study for future Participating Special Entity agreements and for referral to the cities and County. If the increases are not made to the current fee schedule, revenue will be insufficient to fully fund new development’s fair share of the ECCC HCP/NCCP costs.

Next Steps
Coordinating with the Cities and the County
Should the Governing Board recommend to participating cities and the County that they consider applying increases to the development fee and to the wetland mitigation fee, on the basis of the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, Conservancy staff will coordinate with the local jurisdictions, as was done for the 2017 Fee Audit and Nexus Study (adopted in 2021).

Annual Fee Adjustments
In addition to the periodic Fee Study, the Conservancy annually adjusts fees based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Home Price Index (HPI), as detailed in the HCP/NCCP.

Around or before March 15, 2023, these Mitigation Fees will be further adjusted per the CPI and HPI to reflect annual adjustments.

CEQA REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
The proposed actions are exempt from CEQA because they do not constitute a “project” subject to CEQA, pursuant to the state CEQA Guidelines section 15378.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Governing Board direct staff to apply the development fee and wetland mitigation fee increases as recommended in the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study in future agreements between the Conservancy and Participating Special Entities. If authorized by the Governing Board, the Conservancy shall provide 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study to the participating cities and the County and recommend that that they consider adopting the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, and to apply the increases to the development fee and to the wetland mitigation fee as presented in the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, consistent with requirements in the HCP/NCCP for periodic review of HCP/NCCP mitigation fees.

169
170
Agenda Item 6

mitigation fees that partially fund implementation of the HCP/NCCP. The next periodic fee audit is scheduled for the year 2027.

The periodic fee audit is required to ensure that the fees generated by development and other covered activities are adequately covering their share of HCP/NCCP costs. This 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study also includes consideration of long-term funding efforts to fund Preserve System management and monitoring activities following the 30-year permit term of the HCP/NCCP. The 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study focuses on revenues and costs from the development fee and wetland fees because the other two types of Mitigation Fees (i.e., the rural road fee and temporary impact fee) are based on and derived from the development fee and wetland fees.

2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study
Robert D. Spencer of Urban Economics and Sally E. Nielsen of Insight Data and Economic Analysis prepared the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, including the information necessary to support the nexus findings that the Conservancy, participating cities (Brentwood, Clayton, Oakley, and Pittsburg), and the County may make under the Mitigation Fee Act. The 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study is attached to this staff report.

The 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus study compares current actual costs to the cost assumptions used to calculate current mitigation fee amounts. Cost models for the initial urban development area and the maximum development area were updated for the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, and actual costs through FY2021 and estimated costs through the end of the permit term are analyzed and provided.

Post-Permit Funding
The original HCP/NCCP fee amounts, as well as the updated fees from the March 2013 Fee Audit and Nexus Study, excluded post-permit costs. At the time of drafting the HCP/NCCP, post-permit HCP/NCCP costs were more difficult to estimate than other HCP/NCCP costs because of uncertainty about key aspects of long-term Preserve System management and monitoring, such as the extent to which partners like the East Bay Regional Park District (“Park District”) would be involved in assembling and managing the Preserve System. Consequently, costs beyond year 30 were not included in the development fee calculations in the original HCP/NCCP.

At the request of
the Governing Board, the 2017 Fee Audit and Nexus Study incorporated a post- permit analysis that included consideration of an endowment fund to cover post-permit costs for management and monitoring of the Preserve System lands. The Conservancy established an endowment fund with the Regional Parks Foundation (the “Endowment”) in 2020. This 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study also analyzes post-permit funding and considers deposits made to the endowment fund since its establishment, as well as other revenue sources.

The 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study provides an overview of revenue needs and growth to fund the endowment at an amount adequate to cover post-permit costs. The report assumes all impacts allowed under the Plan’s permits will occur by the end of the 30-year permit term in 2037. The report also notes that the pace of development has been significantly slower than anticipated and recommends that the Conservancy consider extending the HCP/NCCP permit term as a way to

171
Agenda Item 6

allow use of the full amount of take coverage provided under state and federal permits and to generate mitigation fee revenue adequate to fully fund Plan implementation and achieve Plan goals.

The HCP/NCCP requires the Board to conduct a periodic audit to assess whether actual HCP/NCCP implementation costs require adjustment of HCP/NCCP Mitigation Fees. The Mitigation Fee Act also requires local agencies to make a series of findings about on-going fee programs every five years. Staff recommends the Board adopt Resolution 2023-02 (attached), which makes findings on the basis of the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study that would meet HCP/NCCP and Mitigation Fee Act requirements.

Notices
A 30-day written notice was posted on the Conservancy’s website and shared via the email distribution list. This written notice informed the public that on February 27, 2023, the Governing Board would consider a nexus study that supports changes to the HCP/NCCP development fee and wetland mitigation fee, and that a copy of the nexus study and instructions to access and participate in the meeting would be available on the website on or before February 13, 2023. Subsequently, the 2022 Fee Audit and Nexus Study was shared publicly via the Conservancy’s website and via the email distribution list on February 13, 2023, 14 days prior to the February 27, 2023 Governing Board meeting.

CEQA REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
The proposed actions are exempt from CEQA because they do not constitute a “project” subject to CEQA, pursuant to the state CEQA Guidelines section 15378.

ATTACHMENT
• East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP Mitigation Fee Audit and Nexus Study (February 2023)
•
Resolution 2023-02

172

65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
P: (925) 252-6900
F: (925) 252-4814
pittsburgca.gov
Community and Economic Development Department – Planning Division

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY OF PITTSBURG CITY COUNCIL will conduct a public hearing on:

DATE: November 18, 2024
TIME: 7 :00 P.M.

PLACE: City Council Chamber at City Hall
65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, California

Concerning the following matter:

Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving an Update to the Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) Mitigation Fees.

On April 16, 2007, the City Council adopted Resolution 07- 10745 approving the East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP, a regional conservation and mitigation plan for natural resources in East County.

HCP/NCCP chapter 9, “Funding,” outlines estimated costs for i mplementing the HCP/NCCP and identifies development-based mitigation fees as a source of funding to offset development impacts to natural resources. The development mitigation fee amounts were established by City Council Resolution 07-10898 and have since been adjusted annually according to housing and consumer price indices. The HCP/HCCP requires periodic audits in years three, six, 10, 15, 20 and 25 of implementation to assess whether changes in HCP/NCCP implementation costs require an additional adjustment of the mitigation fees.

PROJECT CONTACT: Kelsey Gunter, (925) 252-4824 or [email protected]

Why am I receiving this notice?
You are receiving this notice because you have either previously requested notifications from the Planning Division.

Where can I get more information about this project?
The complete file for this project is available for public inspection; please contact the project planner listed above to make necessary arrangements.

What can I do if I have comments on the project?
Written comments citing the project name may be emailed to the project planner listed above or may be mailed to: Pittsburg Planning Division, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565. Written comments received by 5:00 P.M. on the date of the meeting will be provided to the City Council. You may also register your comments or objections by attending the virtual public hearing (see advisory on next page for instructions on how to register a phone-in comment). Pursuant to Section 65009 of the California Government Code, if you challenge this matter in court, you may be limited to those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence on the matter delivered to this agency at, or prior to the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the Planning Division before the hearing body’s action on the matter will become a part of the administrative record.

______________________________
ALICE E. EVENSON

CITY CLERK

173

Project Title: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving an Update to the Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) Mitigation Fees
Location: City-wide

174

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Development and Implementation of the Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship and a Pittsburg Power Company Resolution Authorizing the Use of Funds MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pursuant to a Future Agenda Item request by Mayor Juan Banales on March 20, 2023, the two resolutions will authorize development and implementation of the Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship (Scholarship) for the purposes of promoting higher education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) in the Pittsburg community and improving City of Pittsburg staff retention.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed Scholarship will fund up to $25,000 in annual scholarships beginning in Fiscal Year 2024/25, which will be funded annually by Pittsburg Power Company's (PPC) operating budget (Fund 590).

RECOMMENDATION
City Council adopt the Resolution authorizing the development and implementation of an annual Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship.

Governing Board of the PPC adopt the resolution authorizing the use of PPC funds to pay for the Scholarship.

BACKGROUND
On March 20, 2023, then City Council Member (and now Mayor) Juan Banales requested a future agenda item review the potential of the City creating a scholarship program to improve the staff retention rates within the City and encourage STEM pursuits by Pittsburg’s young adults. In addition to developing critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork skills, an education in STEM can establish a foundation for career and financial stability. 175
The US Department of Labor Statistics reports that STEM occupation sectors including, but not limited to, healthcare, programming, civil, mathematical, computer, and engineering fields are expected to grow over 10% between 2022 and 2032; faster than many other non- STEM occupations. At the nationwide level, careers in STEM are more likely to provide livable wages according to the US Department of Labor. The Silicon Valley in the South Bay Area has been a major employer and region of global impact that demonstrates utility of STEM aptitude and skill development. Especially in the wake of efforts such as the Contra Costa County Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, which strives to bring green technology jobs to the East Bay Region, it is important to attract and retain STEM employers and employees locally.

The US Census Bureau’s most recent (2022) 1-year survey estimates that 22.6% of adults 25 and over in Pittsburg have at least a bachelor's degree. Forty-five percent of these degrees are in science, engineering and related fields. The bachelor’s degree rate is half of the Contra Costa Countywide rate, as 45.1% of Contra Costa County residents 25 and older have at least a bachelor's degree, 52.7% of which are in science, engineering, and related fields.

STEM education can be costly. According to the University of California admission data, the anticipated average 2025/26 tuition for in-state students is $14,934. For California State University admissions, the average 2025/26 tuition is $6,450. On-campus in-state students also pay approximately $30,300 for housing, meals, campus fees, books and supplies, and transportation each year.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
The Budget Stabilization Ad Hoc Subcommittee provided guidance and overall support for development of this Scholarship.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The City of Pittsburg does not currently offer a community or employee dependent scholarship program for education. Using the Richmond Promise Program and the San Pablo Scholarship Pilot Program that aim to remove barriers for education and training in their respective communities, staff working with the Budget Stabilization Ad Hoc Subcommittee shaped the proposed Scholarship.

Goals
A successful Scholarship will encourage Pittsburg’s young adults to seek higher education in STEM and reduce the financial burden of a bachelor’s degree for young adults in the City of Pittsburg and eligible dependents of City staff.

Audience
The Scholarship will serve Pittsburg residents or City of Pittsburg staff dependents up to 25 years old. Staff dependents living outside of Pittsburg are eligible for the funding.

Dependents of staff classified within unrepresented employee groups are not eligible.

The City’s pre-COVID staff turnover rate averaged 7.25% from 2016-2020. From 2021 to present staff turnover has averaged 12%, with a peak of 14% in fiscal year 2021-2022. Due to this upward trend, staff considers the Scholarship as a potential contributing factor to employee retention.
176
Applicants must be accepted into a four-year college with a declared major in a STEM field and have a 3.0 cumulative grade point average or higher. Students in their final year of college and graduate students are ineligible.

Qualifying commissioners of the City of Pittsburg Youth Advisory Commission (YAC) will be prioritized for scholarship funds. YAC commissioners may receive funds prior to serving one full term and must serve for at least one full term on the commission in order to retain awarded funds. A term served shorter than one full term will require the repayment of the awarded funds.

Awards are one-time and cannot be given again to the same individual.

Program Size
Up to five $5,000 grants will be awarded annually with at least one award reserved for a City of Pittsburg staff dependent and the remaining open to qualifying Pittsburg residents as defined in the “Audience” section above.

Application Materials
Completed applications must include an online application, personal statement, transcripts, and letter(s) of recommendation.

Administration and Selection
City staff will administer the Scholarship including formal guideline drafting, advertisement, application development, and application collection. The Community Advisory Commission (CAC) shall act as the selection committee, reviewing the applications for completeness, determining qualifying applicants, and conducting a lottery for selection of up to five winners annually, including at least one staff dependent and all qualifying YAC commissioners.

Timeline
The first Scholarship will kick off with advertisement in November 2024, application portal opening in January 2025, application closure in April 2025, selection in May 2025, and release of funds by August 31, 2025. If successful, subsequent Scholarship years will mirror this timeline until the Scholarship program is discontinued by City Council action.

Program Evaluation
Starting September 2025, and continuing each following September for the duration of the Scholarship, the CAC and City staff will evaluate cost, efficiency, applicant experience, and award processes of the Scholarship. Staff will also provide annual updates to the CAC on City staff retention rates as well as awardees’ educational and career status, as available.

ATTACHMENTS: City Council Resolution
Pittsburg Power Company Resolution
Report Prepared By: Sara Bellafronte, Assistant to the City Manager 177
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter Of:

Authorizing the Development and )
Implementation of the Pittsburg Promise ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Community Scholarship )
WHEREAS, the US Department of Labor Statistics reports that Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) occupation sectors are expected to grow over 10% between 2022 and 2032; faster than many other non-STEM occupations. At the nationwide level, careers in STEM are more likely to provide livable wages according to the US Department of Labor; and
WHEREAS, 22.6% of Pittsburg residents over 25 years of age have earned a bachelor’s degree; this rate is half of the countywide rate for the same age group. Fewer than half of Pittsburg’s 25 years of age and older residents earn bachelor’s degrees in STEM; and
WHEREAS, in addition to spending approximately $30,300 on housing, meals, campus fees, books, supplies, and transportation, it is anticipated that students’ 2025/26 tuition costs for attendance at a University of California and California State University will be $14,934 and $6,450 respectively; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pittsburg does not currently offer a community or employee dependent scholarship for education; and
WHEREAS, attracting and retaining STEM employers and employees is important for Pittsburg’s economic growth and desirability; and
WHEREAS, average annual staff turnover has increased 4.75% since the COVID-19 pandemic, making employee retention a potential success of the Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship (Scholarship) in addition to encouraging Pittsburg’s young adults to seek higher education in STEM and reducing the financial burden of a bachelor’s degree for Pittsburg’s young adults; and
WHEREAS, the Community Advisory Commission (CAC) shall be responsible for reviewing applications, determining qualifying applicants, and conducting a lottery for selection of up to five winners annually, including at least one staff dependent and all qualifying Youth Advisory Commission members; and
WHEREAS, the first Scholarship award will occur in August 2025 and continue annually until discontinued by City Council action.
178
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby authorizes the development and implementation of the Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship. Be it further resolved that the City Council appoints the CAC as the Scholarship review and selection committee, and authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary forms for the purposes of implementing and carrying out the purpose of the Scholarship.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
_____________________________
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
179
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY

OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Authorizing the use of Funds to Pay for the )
Implementation of the Pittsburg Promise ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Community Scholarship )
WHEREAS, the US Department of Labor Statistics reports that Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) occupation sectors are expected to grow over 10% between 2022 and 2032; faster than many other non-STEM occupations. At the nationwide level, careers in STEM are more likely to provide livable wages according to the US Department of Labor; and
WHEREAS, 22.6% of Pittsburg’s 25 years and older population has earned a bachelor’s degree which is half of the countywide rate for the same age group. Fewer than half of Pittsburg’s 25 years of age and older residents have earned bachelor’s degrees in STEM; and
WHEREAS, in addition to spending approximately $30,300 on housing, meals, campus fees, books, supplies, and transportation, it is anticipated that students’ 2025/26 tuition costs for attendance at a University of California and California State University will be $14,934 and $6,450 respectively; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pittsburg does not currently offer a community or employee dependent scholarship for education; and
WHEREAS, attracting and retaining STEM employers and employees is important for Pittsburg’s economic growth and desirability; and
WHEREAS, average annual staff turnover has increased 4.75% since the COVID-19 pandemic making employee retention a potential success of the Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship (Scholarship) in addition to encouraging Pittsburg’s young adults to seek higher education in STEM and reducing the financial burden of a bachelor’s degree for Pittsburg’s young adults; and
WHEREAS, the Community Advisory Commission (CAC) shall be responsible for reviewing applications, determining qualifying applicants, and conducting a lottery for selection of up to five $5,000 winners annually, including at least one staff dependent and all qualifying Youth Advisory Commission members; and
WHEREAS, the first Scholarship award will occur in August 2025 and continue annually until discontinued by City Council action.
180
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Governing Board of the Pittsburg Power Company of the City of Pittsburg hereby allocates up to $25,000 annually for implementation of the Pittsburg Promise Community Scholarship.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by Governing Board of the Pittsburg Power Company of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
_____________________________
Juan Antonio Banales, Chair
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Garrett Evans, Executive Secretary
181
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 1 of 4 October 21, 2024

CITY OF PITTSBURG

CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY CONCURRENT MEETING MINUTES

DATE: October 21, 2024

LOCATION: Council Chamber, City Hall, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565

CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor/Chair
Jelani Killings, Vice-Mayor/Chair
Dionne Adams, Council/Agency Member
Angelica Lopez, Council/Agency Member
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Council/Agency Member
S.L. Floyd, Agency Member
Annie Hill Herring, Agency Member

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Garrett Evans, City Manager/Executive Director
Donna Mooney, City Attorney/Legal Counsel
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk/Agency Secretary (elected) Nancy Parent, City Treasurer (elected)

Mayor Banales called the regular meeting to order at 7:01 P.M. in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 65 Civic Avenue Pittsburg, CA.

ROLL CALL

All members were present.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Banales led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PRESENTATIONS

1. New Employee Introductions

2. CoCoKids

PROCLAMATIONS

3. National Filipino American History Month

4. National Italian American History Month

5. National Immigrants Day

CITY MANAGER REPORTS/REMARKS

Assistant City Manager Aliotti noted that the payment center would be closed on Thursday, October 24th from 8am-12:30pm for staff training, and would re-open from 12:30 pm-4:00 pm. She 182
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 2 of 4 October 21, 2024 also gave an update on Community events.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

Mario Soto, Pittsburg, noted that he has been receiving hate mail at his residence and feels this should not be happening.

Megan Hernandez, Pittsburg, stated that she did not agree with the way candidates are promoting themselves in their campaigns.

Thomas Roehrick, Local 152, shared carpenters core values.

Nicole Arrington, Pittsburg, Thanked Council and staff for all the work that is done that can sometimes go unnoticed. She also brought up concerns with Belmont Apartments, she stated that management is raising rents and illegally evicting tenants. Lastly, she provided an update on ILWU Local 6’s wage negotiations.

COMMITTEE REPORTS

Vice Mayor Killings attended the Finance Management subcommittee meeting.

Mayor Banales called for a ten (10) minute recess at 7:24pm prior to hearing the Consideration items.

Member Lopez left the dais at 7:24pm.

The City Council reconveyed at 7:35pm, Member Lopez was absent and excused.

CONSIDERATION

6. Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Accept and Allocate Grant Funds from Keller Canyon Mitigation Fund for FY 24/25 and FY 25/26 Recreation Programs

On Motion by Member Scales -Preston, seconded by Member Adams and adopted by following vote:

AYES: Adams, Killings, Scales-Preston, Banales
ABSENT: Lopez

6. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract for the Purchase and Construction of Two New Restroom Buildings at City Park

On Motion by Member Scales-Preston, seconded by Vice Mayor Killings and adopted by following vote:

AYES: Adams, Killings, Scales-Preston, Banales
ABSENT: Lopez

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

There were no conflicts of interest statements.
183
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 3 of 4 October 21, 2024

COMBINED CITY COUNCIL, PITTSBURG ARTS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION,

PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY, SOUTHWEST PITTSBURG GHAD II AND SUCCESSOR

AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR

On Motion by Member Scales-Preston, seconded by Vice Mayor Killings and adopted by following vote:

AYES: Adams, Killings, Scales-Preston, Banales
ABSENT: Lopez

8. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Allocating Funds to Reimburse Seecon Financial & Construction Co., Inc. for Infrastructure Costs Incurred Relating to Community Facilities District 2009-01, San Marco (“CFD 2009-01”)

9. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting the Public Improvements for Subdivision 9550 Liberty II

10. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Plans and Specifications and Awarding Project 3023 - Willow Pass Road Storm Drain Repair Project

11. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Application for the Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) 2024 Planning and Demonstration Grant Funds

12. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Application for the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)-Cycle 12 Grant Funds

13. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Belfor Restoration for Project 3026 - 60 Civic Building Repair

14. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Consultant Service Agreement with First Carbon Services International for the Quick Quack Car Wash Project

15. Adoption of a City Council Resolution to Amend the Master Pay Schedule as Required by California Public Employees’ Retirement System

16. Adoption of a City Resolution to Authorize the Renewal of a Reciprocal Tax Information Sharing Agreement Between the City of Pittsburg and the California State Franchise Tax Board

COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

There were no requests for Future Agenda Items.

COUNCIL MEMBER REMARKS

There were none.

184
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 4 of 4 October 21, 2024

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting adjourned at 7:55 P.M. to November 4, 2024.

Respectfully submitted,

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
185
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 1 of 3 November 04, 2024

CITY OF PITTSBURG

CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY CONCURRENT MEETING MINUTES

DATE: November 04, 2024

LOCATION: Council Chamber, City Hall, 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565

CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor/Chair
Jelani Killings, Vice-Mayor/Chair
Dionne Adams, Council/Agency Member
Angelica Lopez, Council/Agency Member
Shanelle Scales-Preston, Council/Agency Member
S.L. Floyd, Agency Member
Annie Hill Herring, Agency Member

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Garrett Evans, City Manager/Executive Director
Donna Mooney, City Attorney/Legal Counsel
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk/Agency Secretary (elected) Nancy Parent, City Treasurer (elected)

Mayor Banales called the regular meeting to order at 7:02 P.M. in the Council Chamber at City Hall, 65 Civic Avenue Pittsburg, CA.

ROLL CALL

All members were present.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Mayor Banales led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PRESENTATIONS

1. Renaissance Entrepreneurship

PROCLAMATIONS

2. Veterans Day

CITY MANAGER REPORTS/REMARKS

Assistant City Manager Aliotti gave an update on Community events.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

There were no public comments.

186
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 2 of 3 November 04, 2024

COMMITTEE REPORTS

Vice Mayor Killings attended the School Districts (2x2) committee meeting.

Council Member Scales -Preston attended the Infrastructure and Transportation subcommittee.

PUBLIC HEARING

3. Adoption of a Resolution Certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Adopting CEQA Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Approving a Vesting Tentative Map; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordin ance Assigning Zoning of Planned Development District to Properties Located Within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and Adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR)

The following spoke in favor of the project:

Dustin Spurgeon
Bill Whitney
William Chisholm
Eric Haynes
Edgar Flores
Thomas Roehrick
Ramon Amaral
Jason Lindsey
Jason Lester
Tom Hansen
Anthony Viscuso
John DeLacio
Pierre McKoy

The following gave neutral comments about the project:

Bruce Ohlson
Wolfgang Croskey

The following spoke against the project:

Mary Pappas Coniglio
Nancy Parent
Meredith Stevenson

On Motion by Vice Mayor Killings , seconded by Member Adams to certify the Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Adopting CEQA Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Approving a Vesting Tentative Map and adopted unanimously.

On Motion by Member Scales-Preston, seconded by Vice Mayor Killings to Introduce and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance Assigning Zoning of Planned Development District to Properties Located Within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and Adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP -24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR) and adopted unanimously.

187
Combined Agency/City Council Minutes Page 3 of 3 November 04, 2024

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

There were no conflicts of interest statements.

COMBINED CITY COUNCIL, PITTSBURG ARTS AND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION,

PITTSBURG POWER COMPANY, SOUTHWEST PITTSBURG GHAD II AND SUCCESSOR

AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR

On Motion by Member Scales-Preston, seconded by Member Adams and adopted unanimously.

4. Minutes of October 7, 2024

5. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Acceptance and Appropriation of the Office of Traffic Safety Grant Funds for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

6. Adoption of a City Council Resolution Amending the Information and Communications Systems Fund 601 Operating Budget and Reallocating Funds to ERP Project 1805

COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

There were no requests for Future Agenda Items.

COUNCIL MEMBER REMARKS

There were none.

ADJOURNMENT

The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M. to November 18, 2024.

Respectfully submitted,

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
188

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Receive and File the Treasurer’s Report for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2024
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2024. The report includes the combined detailed information of the City and the Successor Agency’s (Agency) investments, which are compliant with the City’s and Agency’s Investment Policies.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s expenditure requirements for the next six months are covered by anticipated revenues from City operations and liquidity from maturing investments. The difference between market value and cost as of September 30, 2024, will be reflected in the City’s financial statements for Fiscal Year 2024/25 as an adjustment to interest income for each of the City’s funds on a pro rata basis as required by Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement Number 31. Due to the recent rise in interest rates available in the capital markets, values for existing holdings have fallen on paper and will not be realized. Market values change on a daily basis. The change in market value is considered temporary in nature, as the City mostly holds its investments until maturity, when they can be redeemed at par value.

RECOMMENDATION
City Council accept the Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ending September 30, 2024, for information purposes only.

BACKGROUND
Each fiscal quarter, an Investment Summary Report is required to be provided, by policy, to the City Council for review.
189

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The City’s objectives in order of priority, are to provide safety, ensure the preservation of capital, provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and earn a competitive rate of return (yield) within the confines of the California Government Code and the Investment Policy. Chandler Asset Management is responsible for managing investments in accordance with the City’s investment policy. All portfolio holdings were held with investment grade securities.

The advisor-managed funds are comprised of operating funds managed in a Core Portfolio account, as well as several Non-Successor Agency bond-related funds. The City’s advisor works to achieve the City’s objectives by investing in high quality fixed income securities consistent with the City’s investment policy and California Government Code.

The Core Portfolio represents the City’s cash reserves. Its return objective is to enhance both interest income and principal value as measured by total return. Total return reflects the value added to the portfolio for a period of time from interest income, realized gains and losses, as well as unrealized gains and losses. The portfolio’s total return for the quarter was 2.95%, comparing to the City performance benchmark of 2.86%, the Intercontinental Exchange Bank of America Merrill Lynch (ICE BAML) 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency Index.

Since inception (7/31/2018), the portfolio’s total return through quarter end is 2.26%, which slightly overperformed the benchmark return of 1.96% for the same period. Total returns for the quarter and since inception reflect fluctuations in market value. 190
Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 31 requires the City to recognize the fair market value of its investments at the end of each fiscal year. The market values of investments included in this report were obtained from the State Controller’s office for Local Agency Investment Funds (LAIF), and from the City’s registered investment advisor and bond trustees for longer-term investments.

Attached is the Chandler Asset Management (CAM) Investment Report detailing an economic update, account profile and investment activity for the quarter ending September 30, 2024.

ATTACHMENTS: Letter from City Treasurer
Investment Report by Chandler Asset Management
Report Prepared By: Christina Nguyen, Accountant II
Report Reviewed By: Andy Wang, Assistant Director of Finance 191

INVESTMENT REPORT
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT | chandlerasset.com
Chandler Team:

For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747, or contact [email protected]
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures at the end of the statement. 192

TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024

ECONOMIC UPDATE

ACCOUNT PROFILE

CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS

TRANSACTIONS
1 193

ECONOMIC UPDATE
2 194



Recent economic data suggests positive but slower growth this year fueled by consumer spending. While the consumer has been resilient, declining savings rates, growing credit card debt, higher delinquencies, and a moderating labor market pose potential headwinds to future economic growth. Inflationary trends are subsiding, but core levels remain above the Fed’s target. The labor market is showing signs of cooling, reflecting an improved balance between supply and demand for workers. Given the cumulative effects of restrictive monetary policy and tighter financial conditions, we believe the economy will gradually soften and the Fed will continue to lower rates at a measured pace through this year with the ability to move more aggressively should the employment data warrant.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) delivered the first rate cut of the easing cycle with a 50 basis point cut at the September meeting. Although a reduction in the Fed Funds Rate was widely anticipated, the magnitude was somewhat of a surprise, as market participants were split between whether theFOMC would cut by 25 basis points or 50 basis points. Chair Jerome Powell reiterated previous statements acknowledging that monetary policy has shifted into a more balanced approach addressing price stability and full employment in tandem. The Fed released the quarterly Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) which now forecasts a substantially lower median Fed Funds Rate expectation among Fed Governors in 2025 due to lower inflation expectations and a higher projected unemploymentrate. We believe the Fed will continue to lower rates at a measured pace through this year with the ability to move more aggressively should the employment data warrant.

The US Treasury yield curve shifted lower in September following the 50 basis points rate cut by the FOMC mid-month. The 2-year Treasury yield fell 28 basis points to 3.64%, the 5-year Treasury dropped15 basis points to 3.56%, and the 10-year Treasury yield declined 12 basis points to 3.78%. The 2-year and 10-year Treasury yield points on the curve began to normalize to +14 basis points at Septembermonth-end versus -2 basis points at August month-end. The spread between the 2-year Treasury and 10-year Treasury yield one year ago was -47 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries ended the month of September at -85 basis points.

ECONOMIC UPDATE
3 195
-400
-200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000MOM Change In Thousands (000's)
Nonfarm Payroll (000's)
Non-farm Payroll (000's)
3-month average (000's)

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%
Unemployment Rate
Underemployment Rate (U6)
Unemployment Rate (U3)
Rate (%)
The U.S. economy added 254,000 jobs in September,well above expectations of 150,000. The three-monthmoving average and six-month moving average payrolls continued to trend weaker to 186,000 and 167,000 respectively. The unemployment rate declined to 4.1% in September, and the labor participation rate remained at 62.7%, remaining below the pre-pandemic level of 63.3%. The U-6 underemployment rate, which includes those who are marginally attached to the labor force and employed part time for economic reasons declined to 7.7% from 7.9%. Average hourly earnings rose 4.0% year-over-year in September. U.S. labor market data from September surprised to the upside, with strong job growth and a sharper-than-expected drop in unemployment, suggesting the economy may be more resilient than anticipated. The Federal Reserve’s view is that there has been “substantial” progress towards better balance in the labor market between demand and supply for workers.

Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Labor

EMPLOYMENT
4 196
0 2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Job Openings
Recession
Historical Average
In Thousands (000's)
The Labor Department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS) increased to 8.04 million job openings in August from an upwardly revised 7.71 million in July. Job openings have increased to a ratio of 1.13 jobs for each unemployed individual. The quits rate, an indicator of job availability, declined to 1.9% from downwardly revised 2.0% in July. That is the lowest level since 2020. While the current level of job openings remains elevated from a historical perspective, the trend is decelerating.

Source: US Department of Labor

JOB OPENINGS & LABOR TURNOVER SURVEY
5 197

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%
Consumer Price Index (CPI)
CPI YOY % Change
Core CPI YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

10.0%
Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE)
PCE Price Deflator YOY % Change
PCE Cor e Deflator Y OY % Change
Fed Target
YOY (%) Change
In September, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 0.2% month-over-monthand 2.4% year-over-year, down from 2.5% in August, but slightly higher than expected. The Core CPI, which excludes volatile food and energy components, rose by 0.3% month-over-monthand

3.3% year-over-year, also exceeding consensus forecasts. The Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index rose 0.1% from the previous month and 2.2% year-over-year in August. The Core PCE deflator (the Fed’s preferred gauge) increased 0.1% month-over-month and 2.7% over the past year, still above the Fed’s 2% inflation target. Much of the lingering inflation has been driven by shelter costs and demand for services, but recent data provide confirmation that inflation is moderating.

Source: US Department of Labor Source: US Department of Commerce

INFLATION
6 198
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%
Retail Sales YOY % Change
YOY (%) Change
Retail Sales grew more than expected month-over-monthin September at 0.4% after growth of 0.1% in August. On a year-over-year basis, Retail Sales grew 1.7% in Septemberversus 2.2% in August. Control-groupsales, which are used to calculate gross domestic product,rose

0.7% month-over-monthin September after last month’s increase of 0.3%. Apparel, grocery stores, and miscellaneous store retailers led the advance, while gas station sales fell reflecting lower gas prices. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index for September came in below expectations, contracting to 98.7 after an upward revision to 105.6 in August. The decline reflects recent softening in labor market conditions, and less optimism about the job market and income growth. While the consumer has been resilient, declining savings rates, growing credit card debt, higher delinquencies, and a moderating labor market pose potential risks to future spending. 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
Index Level
Consumer Confidence
Recession
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: The Conference Board All time high is 144.70 (1/31/00); All time low is 25.30 (2/28/09)

CONSUMER
7 199
-25.0%
-20.0%
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%
Leading Economic Indicators (LEI)
Recession
YOY (%) Change
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25

0.00 0.25

0.50 0.75

1.00 Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI)
Recession
3 Month Average
The Conference Board’s Leading Economic Index (LEI) remained in negative territory at -0.2% in August, improving from -0.6% in July. The index dropped 5.0% year-over-year. The improvementcan be attributed to a decrease in the yield curve inversion, an increase in building permits, and stock market performance. The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) increased to 0.12 in August from a downwardly revised -0.42 in July, which was above consensus expectations. The three-month moving average fell to -0.17 in August from -0.13 in July, indicating below-trend growth expectations for the economy.

Source: The Conference Board Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago

LEADING INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
8 200
0 200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
2,200
2,400In Thousands of Units
Annualized Housing Starts
Multi Family Housing Starts
Single Family Housing Starts
Housing starts surprised to the downside in September,declining -0.5% month-over-monthto 1.354 million units after an increase of 7.8% in August. The decline can be attributed to a drop in multi-family housing projects. Total starts were down 0.7% year-over-year. The Freddie Mac average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage dropped to 6.18% in September from 6.44% in August. According to the Case- Shiller 20-City Home Price Index, housing prices rose 5.9% year-over-year in July, decelerating from 6.5% reported in the previous month.

Although the trend is gradually improving, tight inventories and higher mortgage rates continue to impact affordability.

Source: US Department of Commerce Source: S&P
-20.0%
-16.0%
-12.0%
-8.0%
-4.0%

0.0%

4.0%

8.0%

12.0%

16.0%

20.0%

24.0%
S&P/Case-Shiller 20 City Composite Home Price Index
Recession
YOY (%) Change

HOUSING
9 201
40 45
50 55
60 65
70 Institute of Supply Management (ISM) Surveys
ISM Manufacturing ISM Services

EXPANDING

CONTRACTING
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) Manufacturing index contracted at a slower rate of 47.2 in September compared to 47.5 in August. Demand remains subdued and companies are continuing to reduce head counts through layoffs, attrition and hiring freezes. The ISM Services Index increased to 54.9 in September, increasing from 51.7 in August, due to stronger production and neworders. A reading over 50 indicates expansion, while a reading under 50 indicates contraction.

Source: Institute for Supply Management

SURVEY BASED MEASURES
10 202
Components of GDP 9/23 12/23 3/24 6/24

1.7% 2.3% 1.3% 1.9%

1.8% 0.2% 0.6% 1.5%
-0.1% 0.1% -0.6% -0.9%

0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%

0.6% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3%

4.4% 3.2% 1.6% 3.0%
State and Local (Consumption and Gross
Investment)
Personal Consumption Expenditures
Gross Private Domestic Investment
Net Exports and Imports
Federal Government Expenditures
Total
-40.0%
-30.0%
-20.0%
-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%
Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
GDP QOQ % Change
GDP YOY % Change
Source: US Department of Commerce Source: US Department of Commerce According to the third estimate, second quarter GDP increased at an annualized rate of 3.0%, unchanged from the prior estimate. Growth continues to be powered by personal consumption expenditures. Gross fixed investment, government consumption expenditures, and inventories also had positive contributions, with a negative offset by net exports. The consensus projection calls for 2.0% growth in the third quarter and 2.6% growth for the full year 2024.

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)
11 203
Source: Federal Reserve Source: Bloomberg
0 1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Assets
Recession
In $ millions
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) delivered the first rate cut of the easing cycle at the September meeting. Although a reduction in the Fed Funds Rate was widely anticipated, the magnitude was somewhat of a surprise, as market participants were split between whether the FOMC would cut by 25 basis points or 50 basis points. Chair Jerome Powell reiterated previous statements acknowledging that monetary policy has shifted into a more balanced approach addressing price stability and full employment in tandem.

The Fed released the quarterly Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) which now forecasts a substantially lower median Fed Funds Rate expectation among Fed Governors in 2025 to 3.1 – 3.6%. The Fed continues to reduce its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities as per its predefined schedule of $25 billion and $35 billion per month. Since the Fed began its Quantitative Tightening campaign in June 2022, securities holdings have declined by approximately $1.8T to approximately $7.1T.

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%
Effective Federal Funds Rate
Recession
Yield (%)

FEDERAL RESERVE
12 204
Source: Bloomberg Source: Bloomberg

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%
US Treasury Note Yields
2-Year
5-Year
10-Year
Yield (%)

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%
US Treasury Yield Curve
Sep-24
Jun-24
Sep-23
Yield (%)
At the end of September,the 2-year Treasury yield was 140 basis points lower, and the 10-Year Treasury yield was 79 basis points lower, year-over-year. The 2-year and 10-year Treasury yield points on the curve began to normalize to +14 basis points at Septembermonth-end versus -2 basis points at August month-end. The yield curve inversion which began in July 2022 was historically long. The average historical spread (since 2003) is about +110 basis points. The inversion between 3-month and 10-year Treasuries tightened to -85 basis points in September from -121 basis points in August.

BOND YIELDS
13 205

ACCOUNT PROFILE
14 206

OBJECTIVES
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024
Investment Objectives
The investment objectives for the City of Pittsburg, in order of priority, are to provide safety to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio, provide sufficient liquidity for cash needs and a market rate of return consistent with the investment program.

Chandler Asset Management Performance Objective
The performance objective for the portfolio is to earn a total rate of return through a market cycle that is equal to or above the return on the benchmark index.

Strategy
In order to achieve these objectives, the portfolio invests in high quality fixed income securities consistent with the City's investment policy and California Government Code.
15 207

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Pittsburg Managed Cons | Account #10618 | As of September 30, 2024 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

AGENCY MORTGAGE SECURITIES (CMOS)
Max % (MV) 100.0 6.1 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 6.1 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 3.3 Compliant

ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES (ABS)
Max % (MV) 20.0 7.6 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.1 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 4.5 Compliant
Min Rating
(AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

BANKERS' ACCEPTANCES
Max % (MV) 40.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 180 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
CAMP
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.0 Compliant

COLLATERALIZED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-

NEGOTIABLE CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 1.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

COMMERCIAL PAPER
Max % (MV) 25.0 2.9 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.9 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 270 126 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

CORPORATE MEDIUM

TERM NOTES
Max % (MV) 30.0 15.7 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.1 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 3 Compliant
16 208

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Pittsburg Managed Cons | Account #10618 | As of September 30, 2024 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes
Min Rating
(A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

FDIC INSURED TIME DEPOSITS (NON-NEGOTIABLE
CD/TD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 1.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

FEDERAL AGENCIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 19.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 30.0 9.1 Compliant
Max Callables (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 3 Compliant

LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)
Max Concentration (MV) 75.0 0.0 Compliant

LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL (LGIP)
Max % (MV) 100.0 0.0 Compliant

MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 5.2 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 5.2 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MORTGAGE -BACKED SECURITIES, CMOS (NON-

AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, LOCAL AGENCY)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating
(A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
17 209

STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
City of Pittsburg Managed Cons | Account #10618 | As of September 30, 2024 Rules Name Limit Actual Compliance
Status Notes

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES (CA, OTHER STATES)
Max % (MV) 30.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating
(A- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

MUTUAL FUNDS
Max % (MV) 20.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (AAA by 2) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (NCD)
Max % (MV) 30.0 1.5 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 1.5 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A-1 by 1 or A- by 1 if > FDIC Limit) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Max % (MV) 15.0 0.0 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 5.0 0.0 Compliant
Max Maturity (Days) 90.0 0.0 Compliant
Min Rating (A- by 2 or A-1 by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant

SUPRANATIONAL OBLIGATIONS
Max % (MV) 30.0 1.4 Compliant
Max % Issuer (MV) 10.0 0.7 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 2 Compliant
Min Rating (AA- by 1) 0.0 0.0 Compliant
U.S. TREASURIES
Max % (MV) 100.0 40.6 Compliant
Max Maturity (Years) 5 4 Compliant
18 210

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Benchmark* 9/30/2024
Portfolio
6/30/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 1.84 2.18 2.22
Average Modified
Duration 1.76 1.86 1.91
Average Purchase Yield 3.88% 3.64%
Average Market Yield 3.71% 3.96% 4.94%
Average Quality** AA+ AA+ AA+
Total Market Value 74,343,020 72,211,350
*Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index **The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 19 211

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Sector as a Percentage of Market Value
Sector 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
US Treasury 30.22% 31.53%
Agency 26.52% 25.31%
Corporate 21.98% 20.49%
ABS 10.55% 10.68%
Agency CMBS 8.51% 8.56%
Supras 2.00% 3.25%
Money Mkt Fd 0.21% 0.12%
Cash 0.00% 0.06%
20 212

DURATION ALLOCATION
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 0-.25 .25-.5 .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-7 7+
09/30/2024 5.2% 4.5% 12.7% 28.7% 39.0% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21 213

ISSUERS
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
United States US Treasury 30.22%
Farm Credit System Agency 12.61%
Federal Home Loan Banks Agency 12.60%
FHLMC Agency CMBS 8.51%
Royal Bank of Canada Corporate 1.59%
PACCAR Inc Corporate 1.55%
American Express Credit Master Trust ABS 1.48%
Caterpillar Inc. Corporate 1.39%
Cisco Systems, Inc. Corporate 1.38%
Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust ABS 1.38%
The Home Depot, Inc. Corporate 1.36%
Chase Issuance Trust ABS 1.35%
FNMA Agency 1.31%
State Street Corporation Corporate 1.19%
Inter-American Development Bank Supras 1.03%
BMW Vehicle Lease Trust ABS 1.03%
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Corporate 1.01%
Chubb Limited Corporate 1.00%
Amazon.com, Inc. Corporate 1.00%
Honeywell International Inc. Corporate 0.99%
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated Corporate 0.99%
International Finance Corporation Supras 0.98%
John Deere Owner Trust ABS 0.95%
Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust ABS 0.85%
Northern Trust Corporation Corporate 0.81%
Mastercard Incorporated Corporate 0.80%
BMW Vehicle Owner Trust ABS 0.75%
Northwestern Mutual Global Funding Corporate 0.74%
Hyundai Auto Lease Securitization Tr ABS 0.73%
BlackRock, Inc. Corporate 0.73%
22 214

ISSUERS
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
Bank of America Corporation Corporate 0.70%
Deere & Company Corporate 0.69%
BNY Mellon Corp Corporate 0.69%
Duke Energy Corporation Corporate 0.67%
Target Corporation Corporate 0.67%
GM Financial Securitized Term ABS 0.67%
Eli Lilly and Company Corporate 0.64%
Bank of America Credit Card Trust ABS 0.51%
Morgan Stanley Corporate 0.47%
Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust 2024- ABS 0.40%
PepsiCo, Inc. Corporate 0.38%
Toyota Motor Corporation Corporate 0.32%
Mercedes-Benz Auto Lease Trust ABS 0.26%
Allspring Group Holdings LLC Money Mkt Fd 0.21%
Walmart Inc. Corporate 0.21%
Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust ABS 0.19%
Cash Cash 0.00%
TOTAL 100.00%
23 215

QUALITY DISTRIBUTION
Rating 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
AAA 11.5% 12.6%
AA 69.3% 69.1%
A 17.0% 15.9%
NR 2.3% 2.5%
Rating 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
AAA 74.0% 75.9%
AA 4.6% 3.9%
A 16.7% 15.6%
NR 4.7% 4.6%
Rating 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
AAA 13.5% 13.3%
AA 65.9% 67.2%
A 8.3% 7.3%
NR 12.3% 12.2%
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 S&P Rating Moody’s Rating Fitch Rating
24 216

DURATION DISTRIBUTION
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Date 0-.25 .25-.5 .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-7 7+
09/30/2024 5.2% 4.5% 12.7% 28.7% 39.0% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 06/30/2024 6.3% 5.7% 10.2% 27.6% 34.8% 10.5% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 25 217
3 Months 12 Months 2 Years 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Since Inception

TOTAL RATE OF RETURN
City of Pittsburg 2.95% 7.25% 5.04% 1.80% 1.82% 2.26%
Benchmark 2.86% 6.74% 4.58% 1.34% 1.51% 1.96%
*Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index Total rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending market value; it includes interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio.

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Total Rate of Return : Inception | 08/01/2018
26 218

HISTORICAL AVERAGE PURCHASE YIELD
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Purchase Yield as of
09/30/24 = 3.88%
27 219

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Benchmark* 9/30/2024
Portfolio
6/30/2024
Portfolio
Average Maturity (yrs) 0.16 0.26 0.35
Average Modified
Duration 0.16 0.25 0.35
Average Purchase Yield 5.08% 5.02%
Average Market Yield 4.74% 4.54% 4.97%
Average Quality** AA+ AAA AAA
Total Market Value 29,487,867 29,047,344
*Benchmark: ICE BofA 3-Month US Treasury Bill Index
**The credit quality is a weighted average calculation of the highest of S&P, Moody’s and Fitch. 28 220

SECTOR DISTRIBUTION
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Sector as a Percentage of Market Value
Sector 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
US Treasury 66.87% 78.20%
Money Mkt Fd 17.91% 0.86%
Comm
Paper 10.06% 3.36%
Neg CD 5.12% 12.15%
Cash 0.05% 5.43%
29 221

ISSUERS
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Issuer Investment Type % Portfolio
United States US Treasury 66.87%
Allspring Group Holdings LLC Money Mkt Fd 17.91%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. Comm Paper 6.71%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank Neg CD 5.12%
Toyota Motor Corporation Comm Paper 3.35%
Cash Cash 0.05%
TOTAL 100.00%
30 222

QUALITY DISTRIBUTION
Rating 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
AAA 66.6% 50.2%
AA 26.7% 42.5%
A 6.7% 7.2%
Rating 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
AAA 100.0% 100.0%
Rating 09/30/2024 06/30/2024
AAA 45.5% 53.3%
AA 26.7% 42.5%
A 3.3% 3.3%
NR 24.5% 0.9%
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 S&P Rating Moody’s Rating Fitch Rating
31 223

DURATION DISTRIBUTION
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Date 0-.25 .25-.5 .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-7 7+
09/30/2024 55.5% 29.6% 14.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 06/30/2024 51.5% 18.8% 28.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 32 224
3 Months 12 Months 2 Years 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years Since Inception

TOTAL RATE OF RETURN
City of Pittsburg Liquidity 1.51% 5.62% 5.10% 3.42% 2.36% 2.43% Benchmark 1.37% 5.46% 4.96% 3.49% 2.32% 2.33%
*Periods over 1 year are annualized.

Benchmark: ICE BofA 3-Month US Treasury Bill Index
Total rate of return: A measure of a portfolio’s performance over time. It is the internal rate of return, which equates the beginning value of the portfolio with the ending market value; it includes interest earnings, realized and unrealized gains and losses in the portfolio.

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Total Rate of Return : Inception | 10/01/2018
33 225

HISTORICAL AVERAGE PURCHASE YIELD
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Purchase Yield as of
09/30/24 = 5.08%
34 226

CONSOLIDATED INFORMATION
35 227

ACCOUNT STRUCTURE
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024
Original Cost Market Value % of Portfolio
Funds Managed Internally
Cash Equivalents 8,341,159.27 8,341,159.28 3.75% Investment Pools 33,253,574.55 33,322,112.96 15.00% Additional Bonded Debt Funds 68,003,589.32 68,010,932.41 30.61% Total 109,598,323.14 109,674,204.65 49.36%
Funds Managed by City's Investment Advisor
Operating Funds 101,746,551.44 103,182,719.33 46.44%
Bond Managed Reserve 5,267,120.89 5,299,485.78 2.38% Total 107,013,672.33 108,482,205.11 48.82%
City's Section 115 Trust
Section 115 Trust 3,868,055.47 4,050,622.16 1.82% Total 3,868,055.47 4,050,622.16 1.82%
Total City Funds 220,480,050.94 222,207,031.92 100.00% *Market value changes daily and is subject to a number of economic forces, including supply and demand, and can incur unrealized gains and losses. 36 228

SECTOR ALLOCATION
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024
Security Type Original Cost Market Value % of Portfolio Average Maturity Average Yield Operating Funds
Cash Equivalents1 $8,341,159.27 $8,341,159.28 5.76% 1 N/A Money Market Funds 5,412,673.34 5,412,673.34 3.74% 1 4.89% Investment Pools2 33,253,574.55 33,322,112.96 23.01% 1 N/A Total Liquidity 47,007,407.16 47,075,945.58 32.50% 1 4.89% U.S. Treasury Notes 41,306,370.15 41,940,386.41 28.96% 405 3.98% Federal Agency Securities 19,270,033.65 19,585,810.21 13.52% 869 4.21% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1,500,000.00 1,501,291.50 1.04% 51 5.65% Medium-Term Corporate Notes 16,024,485.45 16,230,978.36 11.21% 704 4.18% Asset-Backed Securities 7,696,150.48 7,794,038.65 5.38% 1190 4.77% Commercial Paper 2,910,133.34 2,952,611.00 2.04% 124 5.35% Supranationals 1,457,107.90 1,477,955.76 1.02% 712 4.51% Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 6,169,597.13 6,286,974.09 4.34% 872 4.17% Total Securities 96,333,878.10 97,770,045.99 67.50% 631 4.21% Total Operating Funds 143,341,285.26 144,845,991.56 100.00% 426 3.02% Bonded Debt Funds
Pittsburg Pension Bond 4,068,226.97 4,100,591.86 5.59% 1 5.30% Pittsburg AD Auto Mall 363,794.27 363,794.27 0.50% 1 4.77% Pittsburg AD Vista DM 835,099.65 835,099.65 1.14% 1 4.77% Additional Bonded Debt Funds3 68,003,589.32 68,010,932.41 92.77% N/A N/A Total Bonded Debt Funds 73,270,710.21 73,310,418.19 100.00% 1 5.18% Section 115 Trust
Equity Mutual Fund2 $3,868,055.47 $4,050,622.16 100.00% N/A N/A Total Section 115 Trust Funds 3,868,055.47 4,050,622.16 100.00% N/A N/A Total City Funds 220,480,050.94 222,207,031.92
1,2Funds not managed by City's investment adviser; 3Bonded Debt Funds not managed, nor tracked by City's investment adviser *Market value changes daily and is subject to a number of economic forces, including supply and demand, and can incur unrealized gains and losses. 37 229

PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
38 230

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
47788UAC6 JDOT 2021 A3 0.36 09/15/2025 1,049.87 03/02/2021

0.37%
1,049.67
1,049.83

99.81 5.41%
1,047.84

0.17 0.00%
(2.00)
Aaa/NA
AAA

0.96 0.04
43815EAC8 HAROT 2021-3 A3 0.41
11/18/2025 48,040.53 08/17/2021

0.41%
48,039.83
48,040.37

99.26 5.18%
47,684.24

7.11 0.06%
(356.12)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.13 0.15
43815GAC3 HAROT 2021-4 A3 0.88
01/21/2026 50,240.11 11/16/2021

0.89%
50,229.52
50,237.12

98.70 5.24%
49,585.98

12.28 0.07%
(651.14)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.31 0.30
47789QAC4 JDOT 2021-B A3 0.52 03/16/2026 49,845.33 07/13/2021

0.52%
49,840.88
49,844.11

98.83 4.69%
49,261.40

11.52 0.07%
(582.72)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.46 0.28
89238JAC9 TAOT 2021-D A3 0.71 04/15/2026 50,362.18 11/09/2021

0.95%
50,361.10
50,361.93

98.81 4.64%
49,763.78

15.89 0.07%
(598.15)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.54 0.30
44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74 05/15/2026 80,896.85 07/27/2022

3.67%
77,278.61
79,459.34

99.08 5.23%
80,151.86

26.61 0.11%
692.51
NA/AAA
AAA

1.62 0.20
05602RAD3 BMWOT 2022-A A3 3.21
08/25/2026 91,153.87 05/10/2022

3.23%
91,149.13
91,151.90

99.33 4.75%
90,541.52

48.77 0.12%
(610.37)
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.90 0.44
47787JAC2 JDOT 2022 A3 0.36 09/15/2026 98,049.70 03/10/2022

2.34%
98,028.01
98,040.86

98.85 4.69%
96,922.00
101.10

0.13%
(1,118.86)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.96 0.49
448977AD0 HART 2022-A A3 2.22 10/15/2026 64,149.77 05/02/2022

3.40%
62,586.12
63,487.47

98.90 4.95%
63,443.89

63.29 0.09%
(43.57)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.04 0.40
448988AD7 HALST 24A A3 5.02 03/15/2027 255,000.00 01/17/2024

5.03%
254,951.68
254,962.26
100.81

4.45%
257,068.13
568.93

0.35%
2,105.86
NA/AAA
AAA

2.45 1.30
05611UAD5 BMWLT 2024-1 A3 4.98
03/25/2027 750,000.00 06/20/2024

5.40%
746,015.63
746,419.21
100.96

4.35%
757,222.43
622.50

1.03%
10,803.21
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.48 1.41
36265WAD5 GMCAR 2022-3 A3 3.64
04/16/2027 128,367.88 07/06/2022

3.93%
128,366.99
128,367.48

99.46 4.67%
127,676.78
194.69

0.17%
(690.69)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.54 0.54
44934FAD7 HALST 24B A3 5.41 05/17/2027 280,000.00 05/14/2024

5.41%
279,992.22
279,993.16
101.70

4.37%
284,762.02
673.24

0.39%
4,768.85
NA/AAA
AAA

2.63 1.54
02582JJT8 AMXCA 2022-2 A 3.39 05/17/2027 510,000.00 05/17/2022

3.42%
509,887.19
509,966.16

99.28 4.61%
506,328.51
768.40

0.69%
(3,637.65)
NA/AAA
AAA

0.62 0.60
161571HS6 CHAIT 2022-1 A 3.97 09/15/2027 1,000,000.00 05/11/2023

4.28%
993,945.31
995,875.62

99.68 4.35%
996,774.50
1,764.44

1.35%
898.88
NR/AAA
AAA

2.96 0.92
58770JAD6 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32
01/18/2028 190,000.00 05/17/2024

5.73%
189,977.77
189,979.95
102.19

4.33%
194,166.02
449.24

0.26%
4,186.06
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.30 2.06
39 231

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
58769GAD5 MBALT 2024-B A3 4.23
02/15/2028 295,000.00 09/17/2024

4.24%
294,950.35
294,950.59

99.87 4.34%
294,630.90
207.98

0.40%
(319.69)
NA/AAA
NA

3.38 1.76
05592XAD2 BMWOT 2023-A A3 5.47
02/25/2028 135,000.00 07/11/2023

5.47%
134,976.08
134,982.35
101.24

4.43%
136,673.34
123.08

0.19%
1,690.99
NA/AAA
AAA

3.41 1.12
438123AC5 HAROT 2023-4 A3 5.67
06/21/2028 235,000.00 11/01/2023

5.74%
234,958.62
234,966.67
102.32

4.18%
240,460.30
370.13

0.33%
5,493.63
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.73 1.47
89239FAD4 TAOT 2023-D A3 5.54 08/15/2028 195,000.00 11/07/2023

6.30%
194,978.98
194,982.88
102.33

4.19%
199,552.31
480.13

0.27%
4,569.43
NA/AAA
AAA

3.88 1.64
437918AC9 HAROT 2024-1 A3 5.21
08/15/2028 670,000.00 02/13/2024

5.27%
669,970.86
669,974.83
101.77

4.18%
681,856.92
1,551.42

0.92%
11,882.09
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.88 1.61
89238DAD0 TAOT 2024-A A3 4.83 10/16/2028 375,000.00 01/23/2024

4.89%
374,924.96
374,935.64
101.11

4.20%
379,178.51
805.00

0.51%
4,242.87
Aaa/AAA

NA

4.04 1.62
47800RAD5 JDOT 2024 A3 4.96 11/15/2028 180,000.00 03/11/2024

5.12%
179,989.92
179,991.08
101.66

4.20%
182,992.10
396.80

0.25%
3,001.02
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.13 2.04
36268GAD7 GMCAR 2024-1 A3 4.85
12/18/2028 360,000.00 --

4.90%
359,958.35
359,964.26
101.27

4.18%
364,563.65
727.50

0.49%
4,599.39
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.22 1.74
096919AD7 BMWOT 2024-A A3 5.18
02/26/2029 320,000.00 06/04/2024

5.24%
319,951.39
319,954.55
102.19

4.05%
327,015.26
276.27

0.44%
7,060.71
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.41 1.84
47786WAD2 JDOT 2024-B A3 5.2 03/15/2029 365,000.00 06/11/2024

5.26%
364,928.64
364,932.97
102.53

4.20%
374,232.93
843.56

0.51%
9,299.96
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.45 2.36
02582JKH2 AMXCA 2024-1 A 5.23 04/16/2029 570,000.00 04/16/2024

5.30%
569,883.15
569,893.49
102.98

4.03%
587,009.77
1,324.93

0.79%
17,116.28
NA/AAA
AAA

4.54 2.33
05522RDJ4 BACCT 2024-1 A 4.93 03/15/2029 365,000.00 06/06/2024

4.93%
364,979.52
364,980.82
102.32

4.03%
373,471.76
799.76

0.51%
8,490.94
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.45 2.41
Total ABS 7,712,156.08 4.77%
7,696,150.48
7,701,746.91
101.08

4.31%
7,794,038.65
13,234.74

10.55%
92,291.74
Aaa/AAA
AAA

3.26 1.48
AGENCY
3133ENKS8 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS

FUNDING CORP 1.125 01/06/2025 425,000.00 01/06/2022

1.20%
424,043.75
424,914.98

99.09 4.60%
421,137.44
1,128.91

0.57%
(3,777.54)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.27 0.26
3130AWER7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.625 06/06/2025 1,000,000.00 06/13/2023

4.74%
997,830.00
999,254.63
100.37

4.06%
1,003,698.81
14,774.31

1.36%
4,444.18
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.68 0.66
40 232

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3135G05X7 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.375 08/25/2025 1,000,000.00 03/07/2022

1.76%
953,120.00
987,854.15

96.87 3.95%
968,654.49
375.00

1.31%
(19,199.66)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.90 0.88
3133EPJX4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 3.625 02/17/2026 1,000,000.00 05/15/2023

3.89%
993,250.00
996,621.65

99.70 3.85%
996,959.11
4,430.56

1.35%
337.46
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.38 1.33
3130B0ZP7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.875 03/13/2026 1,000,000.00 06/21/2024

4.85%
1,000,450.00
1,000,378.95
101.52

3.79%
1,015,164.68
2,437.50

1.37%
14,785.73
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.45 1.39
3133EPHH1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.0 04/28/2026 1,500,000.00 05/09/2023

3.90%
1,504,095.00
1,502,168.39
100.20

3.87%
1,502,987.12
25,500.00

2.04%
818.73
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.57 1.49
3133EPVP7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.75 07/08/2026 1,000,000.00 12/06/2023

4.48%
1,006,424.00
1,004,389.28
101.67

3.76%
1,016,662.70
10,951.39

1.38%
12,273.42
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.77 1.67
3133EPZY4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 5.0 07/30/2026 1,000,000.00 11/09/2023

4.85%
1,003,740.00
1,002,512.17
102.23

3.73%
1,022,266.31
8,472.22

1.38%
19,754.14
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.83 1.73
3130AXU63 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.625 11/17/2026 1,000,000.00 11/30/2023

4.53%
1,002,530.00
1,001,816.83
102.01

3.63%
1,020,139.03
17,215.28

1.38%
18,322.20
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.13 1.98
3133EP6K6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 03/26/2027 1,000,000.00 03/25/2024

4.45%
1,001,450.00
1,001,199.73
101.93

3.68%
1,019,281.54
625.00

1.38%
18,081.81
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.48 2.34
3130B0TY5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.75
04/09/2027 865,000.00 04/10/2024

4.85%
862,716.40
863,077.85
102.76

3.59%
888,916.15
19,402.43

1.20%
25,838.30
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.52 2.32
3133ERDS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.75 05/06/2027 1,000,000.00 05/22/2024

4.70%
1,001,317.00
1,001,156.96
102.78

3.62%
1,027,797.30
19,131.94

1.39%
26,640.34
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.60 2.39
3130B1EF0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.625 06/11/2027 1,000,000.00 06/26/2024

4.57%
1,001,530.00
1,001,393.87
102.60

3.60%
1,025,965.66
17,600.69

1.39%
24,571.79
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.70 2.48
3133ERMB4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.25 07/23/2027 1,000,000.00 07/18/2024

4.26%
999,690.00
999,709.82
101.64

3.63%
1,016,411.93
8,027.78

1.38%
16,702.11
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.81 2.61
3130ATUS4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.25

12/10/2027 1,000,000.00 05/15/2023

3.66%
1,024,620.00
1,017,185.32
101.97

3.59%
1,019,722.50
13,104.17

1.38%
2,537.18
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.19 2.93
3130ATS57 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5
03/10/2028 1,000,000.00 04/24/2023

3.76%
1,032,720.00
1,023,074.86
102.91

3.59%
1,029,124.55
2,625.00

1.39%
6,049.69
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.44 3.17
3130AWC24 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.0
06/09/2028 1,000,000.00 07/06/2023

4.49%
978,470.00
983,852.50
101.53

3.55%
1,015,319.37
12,444.44

1.37%
31,466.87
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.69 3.37
3130AWTR1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.375 09/08/2028 1,250,000.00 09/07/2023

4.49%
1,243,625.00
1,244,982.35
102.73

3.62%
1,284,184.31
3,493.92

1.74%
39,201.96
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.94 3.59
3133EPWK7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 09/22/2028 1,250,000.00 10/12/2023

4.71%
1,238,412.50
1,240,668.30
103.31

3.60%
1,291,417.21
1,406.25

1.75%
50,748.91
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.98 3.62
41 233

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
19,270,033.65 101.56 19,585,810.21 26.52% Aaa/AA+ 2.38
Total Agency 19,290,000.00 4.21% 19,296,212.57 3.73% 183,146.79 289,597.65 AA+ 2.20

AGENCY CMBS
3137BM7C4 FHMS K-051 A2 3.308 09/25/2025 486,628.73 05/16/2022

2.99%
490,411.51
487,683.88

98.89 4.39%
481,233.53
1,341.47

0.65%
(6,450.35)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

0.99 0.85
3137BNGT5 FHMS K-054 A2 2.745 01/25/2026 1,000,000.00 02/15/2023

4.64%
949,570.31
977,946.06

98.13 4.24%
981,306.70
2,287.50

1.33%
3,360.64
Aaa/AA+
AAA

1.32 1.15
3137BSP72 FHMS K-058 A2 2.653 08/25/2026 710,000.00 11/29/2022

4.51%
664,903.91
687,451.95

97.49 3.99%
692,195.12
1,569.69

0.94%
4,743.16
Aaa/AA+
AAA

1.90 1.78
3137BVZ82 FHMS K-063 A2 3.43 01/25/2027 500,000.00 12/05/2022

4.27%
484,082.03
491,180.69

98.82 3.92%
494,086.25
1,429.17

0.67%
2,905.56
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.32 2.06
3137F2LJ3 FHMS K-066 A2 3.117 06/25/2027 1,000,000.00 05/10/2023

3.93%
969,218.75
979,736.02

97.84 3.94%
978,365.80
2,597.50

1.32%
(1,370.22)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.73 2.45
3137FAWS3 FHMS
K-067 A2 3.194 07/25/2027 1,000,000.00 05/10/2023

3.92%
971,562.50
981,085.67

97.95 3.93%
979,504.70
2,661.67

1.33%
(1,580.97)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.82 2.60
3137FBU79 FHMS K-069 A2 3.187 09/25/2027 747,367.10 06/09/2023

4.41%
712,392.65
723,180.23

97.89 3.92%
731,588.76
1,984.88

0.99%
8,408.54
Aaa/AAA
AA+

2.99 2.70
3137FETN0 FHMS K-073 A2 3.35 01/25/2028 965,000.00 05/24/2023

4.27%
927,455.47
938,425.55

98.31 3.87%
948,693.24
2,693.96

1.28%
10,267.69
Aaa/AA+
AAA

3.32 2.99
6,169,597.13 98.10 6,286,974.09 8.51% Aaa/AA+ 2.39
Total Agency CMBS 6,408,995.83 4.17% 6,266,690.05 4.01% 16,565.84 20,284.05 AAA 2.15 CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 2,533.55 --

0.00%
2,533.55
2,533.55

1.00 0.00%
2,533.55

0.00 0.00%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
2,533.55 1.00 2,533.55 0.00% Aaa/AAA 0.00
Total Cash 2,533.55 0.00% 2,533.55 0.00% 0.00 0.00 AAA 0.00

CORPORATE
78015K7C2 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 2.25
11/01/2024 500,000.00 05/19/2021

0.74%
525,750.00
500,633.53

99.76 5.07%
498,811.08
4,687.50

0.68%
(1,822.45)
A1/A
AA-

0.09 0.08
42 234

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
57636QAN4 MASTERCARD INC 2.0 03/03/2025 600,000.00 10/28/2021

1.05%
618,294.00
601,921.64

98.94 4.54%
593,661.58
933.33

0.80%
(8,260.06)
Aa3/A+
NA

0.42 0.41
87612EBL9 TARGET CORP 2.25 04/15/2025 500,000.00 02/17/2022

2.08%
502,465.00
500,364.12

98.73 4.66%
493,663.65
5,187.50

0.67%
(6,700.48)
A2/A
A

0.54 0.52
437076CM2 HOME DEPOT INC 2.7 04/15/2025 500,000.00 03/24/2022

2.76%
499,125.00
499,846.05

98.94 4.71%
494,713.17
6,225.00

0.67%
(5,132.88)
A2/A
A

0.54 0.52
06406RBC0 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORP 3.35 04/25/2025 510,000.00 04/19/2022

3.35%
509,928.60
509,986.57

99.30 4.61%
506,430.94
7,403.50

0.69%
(3,555.63)
A1/A
AA-

0.57 0.55
26442UAA2 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS LLC 3.25
08/15/2025 500,000.00 04/18/2022

3.21%
500,605.00
500,121.97

99.14 4.26%
495,686.41
2,076.39

0.67%
(4,435.57)
Aa3/A
WR

0.87 0.85
57629WDK3 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING
II 4.15 08/26/2025 750,000.00 05/10/2023

4.74%
740,385.00
746,220.63

99.77 4.41%
748,263.09
3,026.04

1.01%
2,042.46
Aa3/AA+
AA+

0.90 0.87
931142EW9 WALMART
INC 3.9 09/09/2025 155,000.00 09/06/2022

3.92%
154,891.50
154,966.05

99.80 4.11%
154,696.99
369.42

0.21%
(269.06)
Aa2/AA
AA

0.94 0.91
857477BR3 STATE STREET CORP 1.746
02/06/2026 190,000.00 02/02/2022

1.75%
190,000.00
190,000.00

98.82 5.27%
187,760.50
506.83

0.25%
(2,239.50)
A1/A
AA-

1.35 0.34
00440EAV9 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS LLC 3.35
05/03/2026 750,000.00 08/24/2023

5.19%
715,927.50
729,848.85

98.82 4.12%
741,172.94
10,329.17

1.00%
11,324.09
A3/A
A

1.59 1.51
69371RR32 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 1.1
05/11/2026 600,000.00 02/10/2023

4.54%
538,422.00
569,419.39

95.50 4.01%
573,015.47
2,566.67

0.78%
3,596.09
A1/A+
NA

1.61 1.56
89236TJK2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP

1.125 06/18/2026 250,000.00 01/11/2023

4.55%
223,112.50
236,577.73

95.34 3.96%
238,348.83
804.69

0.32%
1,771.10
A1/A+
A+

1.71 1.66
857477CD3 STATE STREET CORP 5.272
08/03/2026 350,000.00 07/31/2023

5.27%
350,000.00
350,000.00
102.12

4.06%
357,414.47
2,972.82

0.48%
7,414.47
A1/A
AA-

1.84 1.65
06428CAA2 BANK OF AMERICA NA 5.526
08/18/2026 500,000.00 08/24/2023

5.48%
500,680.00
500,422.18
102.67

4.03%
513,372.28
3,300.25

0.70%
12,950.09
Aa1/A+
AA

1.88 1.69
437076CV2 HOME DEPOT INC 4.95
09/30/2026 500,000.00 11/30/2023

4.86%
501,140.00
500,795.72
101.98

3.91%
509,880.23

68.75 0.69%
9,084.51
A2/A
A

2.00 1.81
61690U7W4 MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA

5.882 10/30/2026 335,000.00 10/30/2023

5.88%
335,000.00
335,000.00
103.60

4.06%
347,070.75
8,265.03

0.47%
12,070.75
Aa3/A+
AA-

2.08 1.83
438516BL9 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC

2.5 11/01/2026 750,000.00 05/10/2023

3.96%
714,847.50
728,919.58

97.41 3.81%
730,553.03
7,812.50

0.99%
1,633.45
A2/A
A

2.09 1.98
713448FW3 PEPSICO INC 5.125 11/10/2026 275,000.00 11/08/2023

5.13%
274,925.75
274,947.84
102.56

3.85%
282,046.31
5,520.05

0.38%
7,098.48
A1/A+
NA

2.11 1.88
43 235

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
24422EXF1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.5
01/08/2027 500,000.00 01/18/2024

4.52%
499,705.00
499,773.77
101.29

3.90%
506,436.97
5,187.50

0.69%
6,663.20
A1/A
A+

2.27 2.12
78016HZT0 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 4.875
01/19/2027 665,000.00 01/10/2024

4.88%
664,833.75
664,872.58
101.87

4.01%
677,427.66
6,483.75

0.92%
12,555.08
A1/A
AA-

2.30 2.14
17275RBQ4 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.8
02/26/2027 1,000,000.00 --

4.81%
999,831.60
999,864.92
102.19

3.84%
1,021,884.59
4,666.67

1.38%
22,019.67
A1/AA-
NA

2.41 2.17
857477CL5 STATE STREET CORP 4.993
03/18/2027 325,000.00 03/13/2024

4.99%
325,000.00
325,000.00
102.36

3.98%
332,683.80
585.98

0.45%
7,683.80
A1/A
AA-

2.46 2.23
665859AW4 NORTHERN TRUST CORP 4.0
05/10/2027 600,000.00 09/12/2022

4.08%
597,906.00
598,827.90
100.16

3.93%
600,976.22
9,400.00

0.81%
2,148.32
A2/A+
A+

2.61 2.34
14913UAL4 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 5.0 05/14/2027 1,000,000.00 05/15/2024

4.89%
1,002,930.00
1,002,562.41
102.77

3.88%
1,027,717.99
19,027.78

1.39%
25,155.58
A2/A

A+

2.62 2.40
09290DAH4 BLACKROCK FUNDING INC 4.6
07/26/2027 530,000.00 07/17/2024

4.60%
529,984.10
529,985.07
101.94

3.86%
540,307.64
4,401.94

0.73%
10,322.56
Aa3/AA-
NA

2.82 2.53
69371RT30 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.45
08/06/2027 560,000.00 08/01/2024

4.50%
559,255.20
559,293.29
101.57

3.86%
568,813.24
3,807.22

0.77%
9,519.95
A1/A+
NA

2.85 2.64
532457CP1 ELI LILLY AND CO 4.15 08/14/2027 470,000.00 08/12/2024

4.18%
469,619.30
469,635.99
100.93

3.80%
474,390.09
2,546.49

0.64%
4,754.10
A1/A+
NA

2.87 2.60
023135BC9 AMAZON.COM INC 3.15
08/22/2027 750,000.00 06/26/2024

4.90%
712,095.00
715,256.49

98.17 3.82%
736,260.70
2,559.38

1.00%
21,004.20
A1/AA
AA-

2.89 2.72
66815L2T5

NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.11
09/12/2027
545,000.00 09/05/2024

4.11%
544,983.65
544,983.93
100.44

3.95%
547,422.89
1,182.20

0.74%
2,438.96
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.95 2.75
91324PDE9 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.95
10/15/2027 750,000.00 08/22/2024

4.19%
722,842.50
723,765.10

97.35 3.88%
730,094.88
10,202.08

0.99%
6,329.78
A2/A+
A

3.04 2.83
Total Corporate 16,210,000.00 4.18%
16,024,485.45
16,063,813.29
100.17

4.10%
16,230,978.36
142,106.41

21.98%
167,165.07
A1/A+
A+

1.93 1.77

MONEY MARKET
FUND
94975H254 ALLSPRING:GOVT MM
S 157,235.36 --

4.52%
157,235.36
157,235.36

1.00 4.52%
157,235.36

0.00 0.21%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Money Market
Fund 157,235.36 4.52%
157,235.36
157,235.36

1.00 4.52%
157,235.36

0.00 0.21%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
44 236

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration

SUPRANATIONAL
4581X0EK0 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK 4.5 05/15/2026 750,000.00 06/27/2023

4.53%
749,422.50
749,673.08
101.03

3.84%
757,728.85
12,750.00

1.03%
8,055.77
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.62 1.53
45950KDF4 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP

4.375 01/15/2027 710,000.00 11/29/2023

4.49%
707,685.40
708,296.65
101.44

3.71%
720,226.91
6,559.14

0.98%
11,930.26
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.29 2.15
Total Supranational 1,460,000.00 4.51%
1,457,107.90
1,457,969.73
101.23

3.78%
1,477,955.76
19,309.14

2.00%
19,986.03
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.95 1.83

US TREASURY
91282CDB4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.625
10/15/2024 1,000,000.00 12/02/2021

0.86%
993,281.25
999,910.16

99.84 4.89%
998,365.35
2,885.93

1.35%
(1,544.81)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.04 0.04
91282CDH1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75
11/15/2024 1,000,000.00 11/10/2021

0.80%
998,554.69
999,940.66

99.50 4.84%
995,006.53
2,832.88

1.35%
(4,934.13)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.13 0.12
91282CDN8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.0
12/15/2024 1,100,000.00 12/29/2021

0.99%
1,100,472.66
1,100,032.79

99.27 4.60%
1,091,921.88
3,245.90

1.48%
(8,110.92)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.21 0.20
912828ZC7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
02/28/2025 1,000,000.00 02/03/2022

1.42%
991,054.69
998,801.97

98.65 4.45%
986,464.84
963.40

1.34%
(12,337.13)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.41
912828ZF0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.5

03/31/2025 750,000.00 03/03/2021

0.54%
748,886.72
749,864.58

98.11 4.38%
735,820.31

10.30 1.00%
(14,044.27)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.50 0.49
912828ZL7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
04/30/2025 500,000.00 01/13/2021

0.39%
499,609.38
499,947.40

97.76 4.32%
488,785.16
784.65

0.66%
(11,162.25)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.58 0.57
912828ZT0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.25
05/31/2025 1,250,000.00 10/06/2021

0.72%
1,228,759.77
1,246,141.04

97.42 4.23%
1,217,736.81
1,050.20

1.65%
(28,404.23)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.67 0.65
9128285C0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.0
09/30/2025 750,000.00 04/29/2022

2.90%
752,314.45
750,675.59

99.04 3.99%
742,816.40

61.81 1.01%
(7,859.19)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.00 0.97
9128285J5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.0
10/31/2025 1,000,000.00 06/02/2022

2.88%
1,004,023.44
1,001,275.49

99.02 3.94%
990,156.25
12,554.35

1.34%
(11,119.24)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.08 1.04
912828M56 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
11/15/2025 1,000,000.00 08/25/2022

3.36%
966,093.75
988,188.99

98.21 3.89%
982,148.44
8,498.64

1.33%
(6,040.55)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.13 1.08
9128285T3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.625
12/31/2025 1,000,000.00 08/25/2022

3.34%
977,421.88
991,581.67

98.52 3.85%
985,195.31
6,633.83

1.33%
(6,386.36)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.25 1.20
45 237

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
9128286L9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
03/31/2026 1,000,000.00 08/29/2022

3.39%
961,640.63
983,999.84

97.81 3.77%
978,085.94

61.81 1.32%
(5,913.90)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.50 1.45
912828U24 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.0
11/15/2026 1,500,000.00 05/09/2023

3.65%
1,418,964.84
1,451,126.65

96.68 3.64%
1,450,195.32
11,331.52

1.96%
(931.33)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.13 2.04
912828V98 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
02/15/2027 1,000,000.00 11/29/2022

4.06%
930,585.94
960,869.97

96.91 3.62%
969,140.62
2,873.64

1.31%
8,270.65
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.38 2.28
91282CEF4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.5
03/31/2027 1,100,000.00 11/03/2022

4.46%
1,014,148.44
1,051,361.46

97.43 3.59%
1,071,726.57

75.55 1.45%
20,365.10
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.50 2.39
91282CEN7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
04/30/2027 1,500,000.00 02/13/2024

4.39%
1,427,167.97
1,441,473.15

97.94 3.59%
1,469,121.09
17,262.23

1.99%
27,647.94
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.58 2.44
91282CEW7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2027 1,250,000.00 11/03/2022

4.44%
1,187,792.97
1,213,312.87

99.16 3.57%
1,239,453.13
10,266.64

1.68%
26,140.26
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.75 2.58
91282CFH9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/31/2027 800,000.00 01/30/2023

3.72%
779,968.75
787,252.84

98.76 3.58%
790,093.75
2,140.88

1.07%
2,840.91
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.92 2.75
9128283F5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25

11/15/2027 1,500,000.00 05/16/2023

3.59%
1,417,031.25
1,442,431.91

96.10 3.58%
1,441,464.84
12,747.96

1.95%
(967.07)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.13 2.95
9128283W8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
02/15/2028 1,250,000.00 09/27/2024

3.51%
1,220,019.53
1,220,043.85

97.38 3.58%
1,217,187.50
4,390.29

1.65%
(2,856.35)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.38 3.17
9128285M8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
11/15/2028 1,500,000.00 04/18/2024

4.72%
1,402,792.96
1,412,391.50

98.26 3.58%
1,473,867.18
17,705.50

2.00%
61,475.68
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.13 3.78
Total US Treasury 22,750,000.00 2.95%
22,020,585.96
22,290,624.36

98.10 3.93%
22,314,753.21
118,377.93

30.22%
24,128.85
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.80 1.70
Total Portfolio 73,990,920.82 3.88%
72,797,729.48
73,236,825.82

99.64 3.96%
73,850,279.20
492,740.85
100.00%
613,453.38
Aa2/AA
AA

2.18 1.86
Total Market Value +
Accrued 74,343,020.04
46 238

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 13,342.83 --

0.00%
13,342.83
13,342.83

1.00 0.00%
13,342.83

0.00 0.05%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
Total Cash 13,342.83 0.00%
13,342.83
13,342.83

1.00 0.00%
13,342.83

0.00 0.05%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00

COMMERCIAL
PAPER
89233GNX0 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
01/31/2025 1,000,000.00 05/29/2024

5.47%
963,636.11
982,038.89

98.44 4.66%
984,447.00

0.00 3.35%
2,408.11
P-1/A-1+
F1

0.34 0.33
62479LP33 MUFG Bank, Ltd. - New York
Branch 02/03/2025 2,000,000.00 07/29/2024

5.29%
1,946,497.23
1,964,236.12

98.41 4.66%
1,968,164.00

0.00 6.71%
3,927.88
P-1/A-1
NA

0.34 0.34
Total Commercial
Paper 3,000,000.00 5.35%
2,910,133.34
2,946,275.00

98.42 4.66%
2,952,611.00

0.00 10.06%
6,336.00
P-1/AA-
A+

0.34 0.33

MONEY MARKET
FUND
94975H254 ALLSPRING:GOVT MM S 5,255,437.98 --

4.52%
5,255,437.98
5,255,437.98

1.00 4.52%
5,255,437.98

0.00 17.91%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Money Market

Fund 5,255,437.98 4.52%
5,255,437.98
5,255,437.98

1.00 4.52%
5,255,437.98

0.00 17.91%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00

NEGOTIABLE CD
89115BL57 Toronto-Dominion Bank - New
York Branch 5.65 11/20/2024 1,500,000.00 11/20/2023

5.65%
1,500,000.00
1,500,000.00
100.09

4.79%
1,501,291.50
74,156.25

5.12%
1,291.50
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.14 0.14
Total Negotiable CD 1,500,000.00 5.65%
1,500,000.00
1,500,000.00
100.09

4.79%
1,501,291.50
74,156.25

5.12%
1,291.50
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.14 0.14

US TREASURY
912797GW1 UNITED STATES TREASURY
10/03/2024 1,500,000.00 10/19/2023

5.47%
1,424,710.52
1,499,568.54

99.97 4.77%
1,499,608.76

0.00 5.11%

40.21 P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.01 0.01
47 239

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CFQ9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
10/31/2024 2,000,000.00 02/20/2024

5.18%
1,989,062.50
1,998,703.06

99.95 4.89%
1,999,021.40
36,616.85

6.81%
318.34
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.08 0.08
912797LD7 UNITED STATES TREASURY
11/14/2024 2,000,000.00 08/21/2024

5.16%
1,976,550.00
1,987,716.67

99.43 4.75%
1,988,608.88

0.00 6.78%
892.21
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.12 0.12
912797MP9 UNITED STATES TREASURY
12/17/2024 2,000,000.00 08/21/2024

5.07%
1,968,003.75
1,978,942.64

99.04 4.59%
1,980,814.16

0.00 6.75%
1,871.52
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.21 0.21
91282CGD7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
12/31/2024 2,000,000.00 03/07/2024

5.11%
1,986,406.25
1,995,848.89

99.89 4.67%
1,997,718.76
21,480.98

6.81%
1,869.87
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.25 0.24
91282CDS7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
01/15/2025 1,300,000.00 03/06/2024

5.09%
1,257,242.19
1,285,565.83

99.01 4.59%
1,287,152.35
3,099.86

4.39%
1,586.51
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.29 0.28
9128283Z1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
02/28/2025 1,250,000.00 07/29/2024

5.05%
1,233,642.58
1,238,426.35

99.32 4.40%
1,241,552.74
2,943.72

4.23%
3,126.38
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.41
912828ZC7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
02/28/2025 1,300,000.00 04/04/2024

5.09%
1,255,109.38
1,279,533.15

98.65 4.45%
1,282,404.29
1,252.42

4.37%
2,871.14
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.41
912797KJ5 UNITED STATES TREASURY
03/20/2025 2,000,000.00 04/19/2024

5.18%
1,909,068.89
1,953,438.89

97.97 4.44%
1,959,436.12

0.00 6.68%
5,997.23
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.47 0.46
912797KS5 UNITED STATES TREASURY
04/17/2025 1,500,000.00 04/24/2024

5.16%
1,427,000.94
1,459,513.13

97.83 4.08%
1,467,453.75

0.00 5.00%
7,940.62
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.54 0.53
912797LB1 UNITED STATES TREASURY
05/15/2025 1,500,000.00 05/16/2024

5.12%
1,426,492.50
1,454,235.00

97.52 4.09%
1,462,851.26

0.00 4.98%
8,616.26
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.62 0.61
912797LN5 UNITED STATES TREASURY
06/12/2025 1,500,000.00 07/09/2024

5.05%
1,432,494.69
1,449,120.63

97.27 4.01%
1,459,010.75

0.00 4.97%
9,890.12
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.70 0.68
Total US Treasury 19,850,000.00 5.15%
19,285,784.19
19,580,612.78

98.88 4.50%
19,625,633.20
65,393.82

66.87%
45,020.42
Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.33 0.32
Total Portfolio 29,618,780.81 5.08%
28,964,698.34
29,295,668.60

81.32 4.54%
29,348,316.51
139,550.07
100.00%
52,647.91
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.26 0.25
Total Market
Value +
Accrued 29,487,866.58
48 240

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
47788UAC6 JDOT 2021 A3 0.36 09/15/2025 1,049.87 03/02/2021

0.37%
1,049.67
1,049.83

99.81 5.41%
1,047.84

0.17 0.00%
(2.00)
Aaa/NA
AAA

0.96 0.04
43815EAC8 HAROT 2021-3 A3 0.41
11/18/2025 48,040.53 08/17/2021

0.41%
48,039.83
48,040.37

99.26 5.18%
47,684.24

7.11 0.02%
(356.12)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.13 0.15
43815GAC3 HAROT 2021-4 A3 0.88
01/21/2026 50,240.11 11/16/2021

0.89%
50,229.52
50,237.12

98.70 5.24%
49,585.98

12.28 0.02%
(651.14)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.31 0.30
47789QAC4 JDOT 2021-B A3 0.52 03/16/2026 49,845.33 07/13/2021

0.52%
49,840.88
49,844.11

98.83 4.69%
49,261.40

11.52 0.02%
(582.72)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.46 0.28
89238JAC9 TAOT 2021-D A3 0.71 04/15/2026 50,362.18 11/09/2021

0.95%
50,361.10
50,361.93

98.81 4.64%
49,763.78

15.89 0.02%
(598.15)
NA/AAA
AAA

1.54 0.30
44935FAD6 HART 2021-C A3 0.74 05/15/2026 80,896.85 07/27/2022

3.67%
77,278.61
79,459.34

99.08 5.23%
80,151.86

26.61 0.04%
692.51
NA/AAA

AAA

1.62 0.20
05602RAD3 BMWOT 2022-A A3 3.21
08/25/2026 91,153.87 05/10/2022

3.23%
91,149.13
91,151.90

99.33 4.75%
90,541.52

48.77 0.04%
(610.37)
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.90 0.44
47787JAC2 JDOT 2022 A3 0.36 09/15/2026 98,049.70 03/10/2022

2.34%
98,028.01
98,040.86

98.85 4.69%
96,922.00
101.10

0.04%
(1,118.86)
Aaa/NA
AAA

1.96 0.49
448977AD0 HART 2022-A A3 2.22 10/15/2026 64,149.77 05/02/2022

3.40%
62,586.12
63,487.47

98.90 4.95%
63,443.89

63.29 0.03%
(43.57)
NA/AAA
AAA

2.04 0.40
448988AD7 HALST 24A A3 5.02 03/15/2027 255,000.00 01/17/2024

5.03%
254,951.68
254,962.26
100.81

4.45%
257,068.13
568.93

0.12%
2,105.86
NA/AAA
AAA

2.45 1.30
05611UAD5 BMWLT 2024-1 A3 4.98
03/25/2027 750,000.00 06/20/2024

5.40%
746,015.63
746,419.21
100.96

4.35%
757,222.43
622.50

0.35%
10,803.21
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.48 1.41
36265WAD5 GMCAR 2022-3 A3 3.64
04/16/2027 128,367.88 07/06/2022

3.93%
128,366.99
128,367.48

99.46 4.67%
127,676.78
194.69

0.06%
(690.69)
Aaa/NA
AAA

2.54 0.54
44934FAD7 HALST 24B A3 5.41 05/17/2027 280,000.00 05/14/2024

5.41%
279,992.22
279,993.16
101.70

4.37%
284,762.02
673.24

0.13%
4,768.85
NA/AAA
AAA

2.63 1.54
02582JJT8 AMXCA 2022-2 A 3.39 05/17/2027 510,000.00 05/17/2022

3.42%
509,887.19
509,966.16

99.28 4.61%
506,328.51
768.40

0.23%
(3,637.65)
NA/AAA
AAA

0.62 0.60
161571HS6 CHAIT 2022-1 A 3.97 09/15/2027 1,000,000.00 05/11/2023

4.28%
993,945.31
995,875.62

99.68 4.35%
996,774.50
1,764.44

0.46%
898.88
NR/AAA
AAA

2.96 0.92
58770JAD6 MBALT 2024-A A3 5.32
01/18/2028 190,000.00 05/17/2024

5.73%
189,977.77
189,979.95
102.19

4.33%
194,166.02
449.24

0.09%
4,186.06
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.30 2.06
49 241

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
58769GAD5 MBALT 2024-B A3 4.23
02/15/2028 295,000.00 09/17/2024

4.24%
294,950.35
294,950.59

99.87 4.34%
294,630.90
207.98

0.14%
(319.69)
NA/AAA
NA

3.38 1.76
05592XAD2 BMWOT 2023-A A3 5.47
02/25/2028 135,000.00 07/11/2023

5.47%
134,976.08
134,982.35
101.24

4.43%
136,673.34
123.08

0.06%
1,690.99
NA/AAA
AAA

3.41 1.12
438123AC5 HAROT 2023-4 A3 5.67
06/21/2028 235,000.00 11/01/2023

5.74%
234,958.62
234,966.67
102.32

4.18%
240,460.30
370.13

0.11%
5,493.63
Aaa/NA
AAA

3.73 1.47
89239FAD4 TAOT 2023-D A3 5.54 08/15/2028 195,000.00 11/07/2023

6.30%
194,978.98
194,982.88
102.33

4.19%
199,552.31
480.13

0.09%
4,569.43
NA/AAA
AAA

3.88 1.64
437918AC9 HAROT 2024-1 A3 5.21
08/15/2028 670,000.00 02/13/2024

5.27%
669,970.86
669,974.83
101.77

4.18%
681,856.92
1,551.42

0.31%
11,882.09
Aaa/AAA
NA

3.88 1.61
89238DAD0 TAOT 2024-A A3 4.83 10/16/2028 375,000.00 01/23/2024

4.89%
374,924.96
374,935.64
101.11

4.20%
379,178.51
805.00

0.17%
4,242.87
Aaa/AAA

NA

4.04 1.62
47800RAD5 JDOT 2024 A3 4.96 11/15/2028 180,000.00 03/11/2024

5.12%
179,989.92
179,991.08
101.66

4.20%
182,992.10
396.80

0.08%
3,001.02
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.13 2.04
36268GAD7 GMCAR 2024-1 A3 4.85
12/18/2028 360,000.00 --

4.90%
359,958.35
359,964.26
101.27

4.18%
364,563.65
727.50

0.17%
4,599.39
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.22 1.74
096919AD7 BMWOT 2024-A A3 5.18
02/26/2029 320,000.00 06/04/2024

5.24%
319,951.39
319,954.55
102.19

4.05%
327,015.26
276.27

0.15%
7,060.71
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.41 1.84
47786WAD2 JDOT 2024-B A3 5.2 03/15/2029 365,000.00 06/11/2024

5.26%
364,928.64
364,932.97
102.53

4.20%
374,232.93
843.56

0.17%
9,299.96
Aaa/NA
AAA

4.45 2.36
02582JKH2 AMXCA 2024-1 A 5.23 04/16/2029 570,000.00 04/16/2024

5.30%
569,883.15
569,893.49
102.98

4.03%
587,009.77
1,324.93

0.27%
17,116.28
NA/AAA
AAA

4.54 2.33
05522RDJ4 BACCT 2024-1 A 4.93 03/15/2029 365,000.00 06/06/2024

4.93%
364,979.52
364,980.82
102.32

4.03%
373,471.76
799.76

0.17%
8,490.94
Aaa/AAA
NA

4.45 2.41
Total ABS 7,712,156.08 4.77%
7,696,150.48
7,701,746.91
101.08

4.31%
7,794,038.65
13,234.74

3.59%
92,291.74
Aaa/AAA
AAA

3.26 1.48
AGENCY
3133ENKS8 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS

FUNDING CORP 1.125 01/06/2025 425,000.00 01/06/2022

1.20%
424,043.75
424,914.98

99.09 4.60%
421,137.44
1,128.91

0.19%
(3,777.54)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.27 0.26
3130AWER7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.625 06/06/2025 1,000,000.00 06/13/2023

4.74%
997,830.00
999,254.63
100.37

4.06%
1,003,698.81
14,774.31

0.46%
4,444.18
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.68 0.66
50 242

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
3135G05X7 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION 0.375 08/25/2025 1,000,000.00 03/07/2022

1.76%
953,120.00
987,854.15

96.87 3.95%
968,654.49
375.00

0.45%
(19,199.66)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.90 0.88
3133EPJX4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 3.625 02/17/2026 1,000,000.00 05/15/2023

3.89%
993,250.00
996,621.65

99.70 3.85%
996,959.11
4,430.56

0.46%
337.46
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.38 1.33
3130B0ZP7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.875 03/13/2026 1,000,000.00 06/21/2024

4.85%
1,000,450.00
1,000,378.95
101.52

3.79%
1,015,164.68
2,437.50

0.47%
14,785.73
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.45 1.39
3133EPHH1 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.0 04/28/2026 1,500,000.00 05/09/2023

3.90%
1,504,095.00
1,502,168.39
100.20

3.87%
1,502,987.12
25,500.00

0.69%
818.73
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.57 1.49
3133EPVP7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.75 07/08/2026 1,000,000.00 12/06/2023

4.48%
1,006,424.00
1,004,389.28
101.67

3.76%
1,016,662.70
10,951.39

0.47%
12,273.42
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.77 1.67
3133EPZY4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 5.0 07/30/2026 1,000,000.00 11/09/2023

4.85%
1,003,740.00
1,002,512.17
102.23

3.73%
1,022,266.31
8,472.22

0.47%
19,754.14
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.83 1.73
3130AXU63 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.625 11/17/2026 1,000,000.00 11/30/2023

4.53%
1,002,530.00
1,001,816.83
102.01

3.63%
1,020,139.03
17,215.28

0.47%
18,322.20
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.13 1.98
3133EP6K6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 03/26/2027 1,000,000.00 03/25/2024

4.45%
1,001,450.00
1,001,199.73
101.93

3.68%
1,019,281.54
625.00

0.47%
18,081.81
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.48 2.34
3130B0TY5 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.75
04/09/2027 865,000.00 04/10/2024

4.85%
862,716.40
863,077.85
102.76

3.59%
888,916.15
19,402.43

0.41%
25,838.30
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.52 2.32
3133ERDS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.75 05/06/2027 1,000,000.00 05/22/2024

4.70%
1,001,317.00
1,001,156.96
102.78

3.62%
1,027,797.30
19,131.94

0.47%
26,640.34
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.60 2.39
3130B1EF0 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.625 06/11/2027 1,000,000.00 06/26/2024

4.57%
1,001,530.00
1,001,393.87
102.60

3.60%
1,025,965.66
17,600.69

0.47%
24,571.79
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.70 2.48
3133ERMB4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.25 07/23/2027 1,000,000.00 07/18/2024

4.26%
999,690.00
999,709.82
101.64

3.63%
1,016,411.93
8,027.78

0.47%
16,702.11
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.81 2.61
3130ATUS4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.25

12/10/2027 1,000,000.00 05/15/2023

3.66%
1,024,620.00
1,017,185.32
101.97

3.59%
1,019,722.50
13,104.17

0.47%
2,537.18
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.19 2.93
3130ATS57 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.5
03/10/2028 1,000,000.00 04/24/2023

3.76%
1,032,720.00
1,023,074.86
102.91

3.59%
1,029,124.55
2,625.00

0.47%
6,049.69
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.44 3.17
3130AWC24 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 4.0
06/09/2028 1,000,000.00 07/06/2023

4.49%
978,470.00
983,852.50
101.53

3.55%
1,015,319.37
12,444.44

0.47%
31,466.87
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.69 3.37
3130AWTR1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS

4.375 09/08/2028 1,250,000.00 09/07/2023

4.49%
1,243,625.00
1,244,982.35
102.73

3.62%
1,284,184.31
3,493.92

0.59%
39,201.96
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.94 3.59
3133EPWK7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS
FUNDING CORP 4.5 09/22/2028 1,250,000.00 10/12/2023

4.71%
1,238,412.50
1,240,668.30
103.31

3.60%
1,291,417.21
1,406.25

0.60%
50,748.91
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.98 3.62
51 243

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
19,270,033.65 101.56 19,585,810.21 9.03% Aaa/AA+ 2.38
Total Agency 19,290,000.00 4.21% 19,296,212.57 3.73% 183,146.79 289,597.65 AA+ 2.20

AGENCY CMBS
3137BM7C4 FHMS K-051 A2 3.308 09/25/2025 486,628.73 05/16/2022

2.99%
490,411.51
487,683.88

98.89 4.39%
481,233.53
1,341.47

0.22%
(6,450.35)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

0.99 0.85
3137BNGT5 FHMS K-054 A2 2.745 01/25/2026 1,000,000.00 02/15/2023

4.64%
949,570.31
977,946.06

98.13 4.24%
981,306.70
2,287.50

0.45%
3,360.64
Aaa/AA+
AAA

1.32 1.15
3137BSP72 FHMS K-058 A2 2.653 08/25/2026 710,000.00 11/29/2022

4.51%
664,903.91
687,451.95

97.49 3.99%
692,195.12
1,569.69

0.32%
4,743.16
Aaa/AA+
AAA

1.90 1.78
3137BVZ82 FHMS K-063 A2 3.43 01/25/2027 500,000.00 12/05/2022

4.27%
484,082.03
491,180.69

98.82 3.92%
494,086.25
1,429.17

0.23%
2,905.56
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.32 2.06
3137F2LJ3 FHMS K-066 A2 3.117 06/25/2027 1,000,000.00 05/10/2023

3.93%
969,218.75
979,736.02

97.84 3.94%
978,365.80
2,597.50

0.45%
(1,370.22)
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.73 2.45
3137FAWS3 FHMS
K-067 A2 3.194 07/25/2027 1,000,000.00 05/10/2023

3.92%
971,562.50
981,085.67

97.95 3.93%
979,504.70
2,661.67

0.45%
(1,580.97)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.82 2.60
3137FBU79 FHMS K-069 A2 3.187 09/25/2027 747,367.10 06/09/2023

4.41%
712,392.65
723,180.23

97.89 3.92%
731,588.76
1,984.88

0.34%
8,408.54
Aaa/AAA
AA+

2.99 2.70
3137FETN0 FHMS K-073 A2 3.35 01/25/2028 965,000.00 05/24/2023

4.27%
927,455.47
938,425.55

98.31 3.87%
948,693.24
2,693.96

0.44%
10,267.69
Aaa/AA+
AAA

3.32 2.99
6,169,597.13 98.10 6,286,974.09 2.90% Aaa/AA+ 2.39
Total Agency CMBS 6,408,995.83 4.17% 6,266,690.05 4.01% 16,565.84 20,284.05 AAA 2.15 CASH
CCYUSD Receivable 2,533.55 --

0.00%
2,533.55
2,533.55

1.00 0.00%
2,533.55

0.00 0.00%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
CCYUSD Receivable 13,342.83 --

0.00%
13,342.83
13,342.83

1.00 0.00%
13,342.83

0.00 0.01%

0.00 Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00
90PITT$00 City of Pittsburg 8,325,282.89 06/30/2024

0.00%
8,325,282.89
8,325,282.89

1.00 0.00%
8,325,282.89

0.00 3.84%

0.00 NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
90PITT$02 City of Pittsburg 68,003,589.32 --

0.00%
68,003,589.32
68,003,589.32

1.00 0.00%
68,010,932.42

0.00 31.35%
7,343.10
NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
52 244

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
Total Cash 76,344,748.59 0.00%
76,344,748.59
76,344,748.59

1.00 0.00%
76,352,091.69

0.00 35.20%
7,343.10
Aaa/AAA
AAA

0.00 0.00

COMMERCIAL
PAPER
89233GNX0 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
01/31/2025 1,000,000.00 05/29/2024

5.47%
963,636.11
982,038.89

98.44 4.66%
984,447.00

0.00 0.45%
2,408.11
P-1/A-1+
F1

0.34 0.33
62479LP33 MUFG Bank, Ltd. - New York
Branch 02/03/2025 2,000,000.00 07/29/2024

5.29%
1,946,497.23
1,964,236.12

98.41 4.66%
1,968,164.00

0.00 0.91%
3,927.88
P-1/A-1
NA

0.34 0.34
Total Commercial
Paper 3,000,000.00 5.35%
2,910,133.34
2,946,275.00

98.42 4.66%
2,952,611.00

0.00 1.36%
6,336.00
P-1/AA-
A+

0.34 0.33

CORPORATE
78015K7C2 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 2.25
11/01/2024 500,000.00 05/19/2021

0.74%
525,750.00
500,633.53

99.76 5.07%
498,811.08
4,687.50

0.23%
(1,822.45)
A1/A
AA-

0.09 0.08
57636QAN4 MASTERCARD INC 2.0 03/03/2025 600,000.00 10/28/2021

1.05%
618,294.00
601,921.64

98.94 4.54%
593,661.58
933.33

0.27%
(8,260.06)
Aa3/A+

NA

0.42 0.41
87612EBL9 TARGET CORP 2.25 04/15/2025 500,000.00 02/17/2022

2.08%
502,465.00
500,364.12

98.73 4.66%
493,663.65
5,187.50

0.23%
(6,700.48)
A2/A
A

0.54 0.52
437076CM2 HOME DEPOT INC 2.7 04/15/2025 500,000.00 03/24/2022

2.76%
499,125.00
499,846.05

98.94 4.71%
494,713.17
6,225.00

0.23%
(5,132.88)
A2/A
A

0.54 0.52
06406RBC0 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
CORP 3.35 04/25/2025 510,000.00 04/19/2022

3.35%
509,928.60
509,986.57

99.30 4.61%
506,430.94
7,403.50

0.23%
(3,555.63)
A1/A
AA-

0.57 0.55
26442UAA2 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS LLC 3.25
08/15/2025 500,000.00 04/18/2022

3.21%
500,605.00
500,121.97

99.14 4.26%
495,686.41
2,076.39

0.23%
(4,435.57)
Aa3/A
WR

0.87 0.85
57629WDK3 MASSMUTUAL GLOBAL FUNDING
II 4.15 08/26/2025 750,000.00 05/10/2023

4.74%
740,385.00
746,220.63

99.77 4.41%
748,263.09
3,026.04

0.34%
2,042.46
Aa3/AA+
AA+

0.90 0.87
931142EW9 WALMART INC 3.9 09/09/2025 155,000.00 09/06/2022

3.92%
154,891.50
154,966.05

99.80 4.11%
154,696.99
369.42

0.07%
(269.06)
Aa2/AA
AA

0.94 0.91
857477BR3 STATE STREET CORP 1.746
02/06/2026 190,000.00 02/02/2022

1.75%
190,000.00
190,000.00

98.82 5.27%
187,760.50
506.83

0.09%
(2,239.50)
A1/A
AA-

1.35 0.34
00440EAV9 CHUBB INA HOLDINGS LLC 3.35
05/03/2026 750,000.00 08/24/2023

5.19%
715,927.50
729,848.85

98.82 4.12%
741,172.94
10,329.17

0.34%
11,324.09
A3/A
A

1.59 1.51
53 245

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
69371RR32 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 1.1
05/11/2026 600,000.00 02/10/2023

4.54%
538,422.00
569,419.39

95.50 4.01%
573,015.47
2,566.67

0.26%
3,596.09
A1/A+
NA

1.61 1.56
89236TJK2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP

1.125 06/18/2026 250,000.00 01/11/2023

4.55%
223,112.50
236,577.73

95.34 3.96%
238,348.83
804.69

0.11%
1,771.10
A1/A+
A+

1.71 1.66
857477CD3 STATE STREET CORP 5.272
08/03/2026 350,000.00 07/31/2023

5.27%
350,000.00
350,000.00
102.12

4.06%
357,414.47
2,972.82

0.16%
7,414.47
A1/A
AA-

1.84 1.65
06428CAA2 BANK OF AMERICA NA 5.526
08/18/2026 500,000.00 08/24/2023

5.48%
500,680.00
500,422.18
102.67

4.03%
513,372.28
3,300.25

0.24%
12,950.09
Aa1/A+
AA

1.88 1.69
437076CV2 HOME DEPOT INC 4.95
09/30/2026 500,000.00 11/30/2023

4.86%
501,140.00
500,795.72
101.98

3.91%
509,880.23

68.75 0.24%
9,084.51
A2/A
A

2.00 1.81
61690U7W4 MORGAN STANLEY BANK NA

5.882 10/30/2026 335,000.00 10/30/2023

5.88%
335,000.00
335,000.00
103.60

4.06%
347,070.75
8,265.03

0.16%
12,070.75
Aa3/A+

AA-

2.08 1.83
438516BL9 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC

2.5 11/01/2026 750,000.00 05/10/2023

3.96%
714,847.50
728,919.58

97.41 3.81%
730,553.03
7,812.50

0.34%
1,633.45
A2/A
A

2.09 1.98
713448FW3 PEPSICO INC 5.125 11/10/2026 275,000.00 11/08/2023

5.13%
274,925.75
274,947.84
102.56

3.85%
282,046.31
5,520.05

0.13%
7,098.48
A1/A+
NA

2.11 1.88
24422EXF1 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 4.5
01/08/2027 500,000.00 01/18/2024

4.52%
499,705.00
499,773.77
101.29

3.90%
506,436.97
5,187.50

0.23%
6,663.20
A1/A
A+

2.27 2.12
78016HZT0 ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 4.875
01/19/2027 665,000.00 01/10/2024

4.88%
664,833.75
664,872.58
101.87

4.01%
677,427.66
6,483.75

0.31%
12,555.08
A1/A
AA-

2.30 2.14
17275RBQ4 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.8
02/26/2027 1,000,000.00 --

4.81%
999,831.60
999,864.92
102.19

3.84%
1,021,884.59
4,666.67

0.47%
22,019.67
A1/AA-
NA

2.41 2.17
857477CL5 STATE STREET CORP 4.993
03/18/2027 325,000.00 03/13/2024

4.99%
325,000.00
325,000.00
102.36

3.98%
332,683.80
585.98

0.15%
7,683.80
A1/A
AA-

2.46 2.23
665859AW4 NORTHERN TRUST CORP 4.0
05/10/2027 600,000.00 09/12/2022

4.08%
597,906.00
598,827.90
100.16

3.93%
600,976.22
9,400.00

0.28%
2,148.32
A2/A+
A+

2.61 2.34
14913UAL4 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP 5.0 05/14/2027 1,000,000.00 05/15/2024

4.89%
1,002,930.00
1,002,562.41
102.77

3.88%
1,027,717.99
19,027.78

0.47%
25,155.58
A2/A

A+

2.62 2.40
09290DAH4 BLACKROCK FUNDING INC 4.6
07/26/2027 530,000.00 07/17/2024

4.60%
529,984.10
529,985.07
101.94

3.86%
540,307.64
4,401.94

0.25%
10,322.56
Aa3/AA-
NA

2.82 2.53
69371RT30 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP 4.45
08/06/2027 560,000.00 08/01/2024

4.50%
559,255.20
559,293.29
101.57

3.86%
568,813.24
3,807.22

0.26%
9,519.95
A1/A+
NA

2.85 2.64
532457CP1 ELI LILLY AND CO 4.15 08/14/2027 470,000.00 08/12/2024

4.18%
469,619.30
469,635.99
100.93

3.80%
474,390.09
2,546.49

0.22%
4,754.10
A1/A+
NA

2.87 2.60
54 246

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
023135BC9 AMAZON.COM INC 3.15
08/22/2027 750,000.00 06/26/2024

4.90%
712,095.00
715,256.49

98.17 3.82%
736,260.70
2,559.38

0.34%
21,004.20
A1/AA
AA-

2.89 2.72
66815L2T5

NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.11
09/12/2027
545,000.00 09/05/2024

4.11%
544,983.65
544,983.93
100.44

3.95%
547,422.89
1,182.20

0.25%
2,438.96
Aaa/AA+
AAA

2.95 2.75
91324PDE9 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC 2.95
10/15/2027 750,000.00 08/22/2024

4.19%
722,842.50
723,765.10

97.35 3.88%
730,094.88
10,202.08

0.34%
6,329.78
A2/A+
A

3.04 2.83
Total Corporate 16,210,000.00 4.18%
16,024,485.45
16,063,813.29
100.17

4.10%
16,230,978.36
142,106.41

7.48%
167,165.07
A1/A+
A+

1.93 1.77

EQUITY MUTUAL
FUND
90PARS$00 City of Pittsburg 3,868,055.47 --

0.00%
3,868,055.47
3,868,055.47

1.05 0.00%
4,050,622.16

0.00 1.87%
182,566.69
NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Equity Mutual
Fund 3,868,055.47 0.00%
3,868,055.47
3,868,055.47

1.05 0.00%
4,050,622.16

0.00 1.87%
182,566.69
NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00

INVESTMENT POOL
90PITT$01 City of Pittsburg 33,253,574.55 --

0.00%
33,253,574.55
33,253,574.55

1.00 0.00%
33,322,112.96

0.00 15.36%
68,538.41
NA/NA

NA

0.00 0.00
Total Investment
Pool 33,253,574.55 0.00%
33,253,574.55
33,253,574.55

1.00 0.00%
33,322,112.96

0.00 15.36%
68,538.41
NA/NA
NA

0.00 0.00

MONEY MARKET
FUND
94975H254 ALLSPRING:GOVT MM S 157,235.36 --

4.52%
157,235.36
157,235.36

1.00 4.52%
157,235.36

0.00 0.07%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
94975H254 ALLSPRING:GOVT MM S 5,255,437.98 --

4.52%
5,255,437.98
5,255,437.98

1.00 4.52%
5,255,437.98

0.00 2.42%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00
Total Money Market
Fund 5,412,673.34 4.52%
5,412,673.34
5,412,673.34

1.00 4.52%
5,412,673.34

0.00 2.50%

0.00 Aaa/AAAm
NA

0.00 0.00

NEGOTIABLE CD
55 247

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
89115BL57 Toronto-Dominion Bank - New
York Branch 5.65 11/20/2024 1,500,000.00 11/20/2023

5.65%
1,500,000.00
1,500,000.00
100.09

4.79%
1,501,291.50
74,156.25

0.69%
1,291.50
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.14 0.14
1,500,000.00 100.09 1,501,291.50 0.69% P-1/A-1+ 0.14
Total Negotiable CD 1,500,000.00 5.65% 1,500,000.00 4.79% 74,156.25 1,291.50 F1+ 0.14

SUPRANATIONAL
4581X0EK0 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT
BANK 4.5 05/15/2026 750,000.00 06/27/2023

4.53%
749,422.50
749,673.08
101.03

3.84%
757,728.85
12,750.00

0.35%
8,055.77
Aaa/AAA
NA

1.62 1.53
45950KDF4 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORP

4.375 01/15/2027 710,000.00 11/29/2023

4.49%
707,685.40
708,296.65
101.44

3.71%
720,226.91
6,559.14

0.33%
11,930.26
Aaa/AAA
NA

2.29 2.15
1,457,107.90 101.23 1,477,955.76 0.68% Aaa/AAA 1.95
Total Supranational 1,460,000.00 4.51% 1,457,969.73 3.78% 19,309.14 19,986.03 NA 1.83

US TREASURY
912797GW1 UNITED STATES TREASURY
10/03/2024 1,500,000.00 10/19/2023

5.47%
1,424,710.52
1,499,568.54

99.97 4.77%
1,499,608.76

0.00 0.69%

40.21 P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.01 0.01
91282CDB4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.625
10/15/2024 1,000,000.00 12/02/2021

0.86%
993,281.25
999,910.16

99.84 4.89%
998,365.35
2,885.93

0.46%
(1,544.81)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.04 0.04
91282CFQ9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.375
10/31/2024 2,000,000.00 02/20/2024

5.18%
1,989,062.50
1,998,703.06

99.95 4.89%
1,999,021.40
36,616.85

0.92%
318.34
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.08 0.08
912797LD7 UNITED STATES TREASURY
11/14/2024 2,000,000.00 08/21/2024

5.16%
1,976,550.00
1,987,716.67

99.43 4.75%
1,988,608.88

0.00 0.92%
892.21
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.12 0.12
91282CDH1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.75

11/15/2024 1,000,000.00 11/10/2021

0.80%
998,554.69
999,940.66

99.50 4.84%
995,006.53
2,832.88

0.46%
(4,934.13)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.13 0.12
91282CDN8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.0
12/15/2024 1,100,000.00 12/29/2021

0.99%
1,100,472.66
1,100,032.79

99.27 4.60%
1,091,921.88
3,245.90

0.50%
(8,110.92)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.21 0.20
912797MP9 UNITED STATES TREASURY
12/17/2024 2,000,000.00 08/21/2024

5.07%
1,968,003.75
1,978,942.64

99.04 4.59%
1,980,814.16

0.00 0.91%
1,871.52
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.21 0.21
91282CGD7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 4.25
12/31/2024 2,000,000.00 03/07/2024

5.11%
1,986,406.25
1,995,848.89

99.89 4.67%
1,997,718.76
21,480.98

0.92%
1,869.87
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.25 0.24
91282CDS7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
01/15/2025 1,300,000.00 03/06/2024

5.09%
1,257,242.19
1,285,565.83

99.01 4.59%
1,287,152.35
3,099.86

0.59%
1,586.51
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.29 0.28
56 248

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
912828ZC7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
02/28/2025 1,000,000.00 02/03/2022

1.42%
991,054.69
998,801.97

98.65 4.45%
986,464.84
963.40

0.45%
(12,337.13)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.41
9128283Z1 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
02/28/2025 1,250,000.00 07/29/2024

5.05%
1,233,642.58
1,238,426.35

99.32 4.40%
1,241,552.74
2,943.72

0.57%
3,126.38
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.41
912828ZC7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 1.125
02/28/2025 1,300,000.00 04/04/2024

5.09%
1,255,109.38
1,279,533.15

98.65 4.45%
1,282,404.29
1,252.42

0.59%
2,871.14
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.41 0.41
912797KJ5 UNITED STATES TREASURY
03/20/2025 2,000,000.00 04/19/2024

5.18%
1,909,068.89
1,953,438.89

97.97 4.44%
1,959,436.12

0.00 0.90%
5,997.23
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.47 0.46
912828ZF0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.5
03/31/2025 750,000.00 03/03/2021

0.54%
748,886.72
749,864.58

98.11 4.38%
735,820.31

10.30 0.34%
(14,044.27)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.50 0.49
912797KS5 UNITED STATES TREASURY
04/17/2025 1,500,000.00 04/24/2024

5.16%
1,427,000.94
1,459,513.13

97.83 4.08%
1,467,453.75

0.00 0.68%
7,940.62
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.54 0.53
912828ZL7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.375
04/30/2025 500,000.00 01/13/2021

0.39%
499,609.38
499,947.40

97.76 4.32%
488,785.16
784.65

0.23%
(11,162.25)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.58 0.57
912797LB1 UNITED STATES TREASURY
05/15/2025 1,500,000.00 05/16/2024

5.12%
1,426,492.50
1,454,235.00

97.52 4.09%
1,462,851.26

0.00 0.67%
8,616.26
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.62 0.61
912828ZT0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 0.25

05/31/2025 1,250,000.00 10/06/2021

0.72%
1,228,759.77
1,246,141.04

97.42 4.23%
1,217,736.81
1,050.20

0.56%
(28,404.23)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

0.67 0.65
912797LN5 UNITED STATES TREASURY
06/12/2025 1,500,000.00 07/09/2024

5.05%
1,432,494.69
1,449,120.63

97.27 4.01%
1,459,010.75

0.00 0.67%
9,890.12
P-1/A-1+
F1+

0.70 0.68
9128285C0 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.0
09/30/2025 750,000.00 04/29/2022

2.90%
752,314.45
750,675.59

99.04 3.99%
742,816.40

61.81 0.34%
(7,859.19)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.00 0.97
9128285J5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.0
10/31/2025 1,000,000.00 06/02/2022

2.88%
1,004,023.44
1,001,275.49

99.02 3.94%
990,156.25
12,554.35

0.46%
(11,119.24)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.08 1.04
912828M56 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
11/15/2025 1,000,000.00 08/25/2022

3.36%
966,093.75
988,188.99

98.21 3.89%
982,148.44
8,498.64

0.45%
(6,040.55)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.13 1.08
9128285T3 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.625
12/31/2025 1,000,000.00 08/25/2022

3.34%
977,421.88
991,581.67

98.52 3.85%
985,195.31
6,633.83

0.45%
(6,386.36)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.25 1.20
9128286L9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25

03/31/2026 1,000,000.00 08/29/2022

3.39%
961,640.63
983,999.84

97.81 3.77%
978,085.94

61.81 0.45%
(5,913.90)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.50 1.45
912828U24 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.0
11/15/2026 1,500,000.00 05/09/2023

3.65%
1,418,964.84
1,451,126.65

96.68 3.64%
1,450,195.32
11,331.52

0.67%
(931.33)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.13 2.04
912828V98 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
02/15/2027 1,000,000.00 11/29/2022

4.06%
930,585.94
960,869.97

96.91 3.62%
969,140.62
2,873.64

0.45%
8,270.65
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.38 2.28
57 249

HOLDINGS REPORT
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639 | As of September 30, 2024 Cusip Security Description Par Value/
Units
Purchase
Date
Purchase
Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt

Price
Mkt
YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.

Gain/Loss
Moody's/
S&P/
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
91282CEF4 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.5
03/31/2027 1,100,000.00 11/03/2022

4.46%
1,014,148.44
1,051,361.46

97.43 3.59%
1,071,726.57

75.55 0.49%
20,365.10
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.50 2.39
91282CEN7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
04/30/2027 1,500,000.00 02/13/2024

4.39%
1,427,167.97
1,441,473.15

97.94 3.59%
1,469,121.09
17,262.23

0.68%
27,647.94
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.58 2.44
91282CEW7 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.25
06/30/2027 1,250,000.00 11/03/2022

4.44%
1,187,792.97
1,213,312.87

99.16 3.57%
1,239,453.13
10,266.64

0.57%
26,140.26
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.75 2.58
91282CFH9 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
08/31/2027 800,000.00 01/30/2023

3.72%
779,968.75
787,252.84

98.76 3.58%
790,093.75
2,140.88

0.36%
2,840.91
Aaa/AA+
AA+

2.92 2.75
9128283F5 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.25
11/15/2027 1,500,000.00 05/16/2023

3.59%
1,417,031.25
1,442,431.91

96.10 3.58%
1,441,464.84
12,747.96

0.66%
(967.07)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.13 2.95
9128283W8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 2.75
02/15/2028 1,250,000.00 09/27/2024

3.51%
1,220,019.53
1,220,043.85

97.38 3.58%
1,217,187.50
4,390.29

0.56%
(2,856.35)
Aaa/AA+
AA+

3.38 3.17
9128285M8 UNITED STATES TREASURY 3.125
11/15/2028 1,500,000.00 04/18/2024

4.72%
1,402,792.96
1,412,391.50

98.26 3.58%
1,473,867.18
17,705.50

0.68%
61,475.68
Aaa/AA+
AA+

4.13 3.78
Total US Treasury 42,600,000.00 3.98%
41,306,370.15
41,871,237.15

98.46 4.20%
41,940,386.41
183,771.75

19.34%
69,149.27
Aaa/AA+
AA+

1.11 1.06
Total Portfolio 217,060,203.86 2.01%
215,212,930.05
215,982,996.64

45.45 1.96%
216,907,546.14
632,290.92
100.00%
924,549.49
Aa1/AA

AA

0.78 0.67
Total Market Value +
Accrued 217,539,837.06
58 250

TRANSACTIONS
59 251

TRANSACTION LEDGER
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607|07/01/2024 Through 09/30/2024| Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/23/2024 3133ERMB4 1,000,000.00

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT
BANKS FUNDING CORP 4.25

07/23/2027

99.969 4.26% (999,690.00) 0.00 (999,690.00) 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2024 09290DAH4 530,000.00 BLACKROCK FUNDING INC

4.6 07/26/2027 99.997 4.60% (529,984.10) 0.00 (529,984.10) 0.00 Purchase 08/06/2024 69371RT30 560,000.00 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP

4.45 08/06/2027 99.867 4.50% (559,255.20) 0.00 (559,255.20) 0.00 Purchase 08/14/2024 532457CP1 470,000.00 ELI LILLY AND CO 4.15 08/14/2027 99.919 4.18% (469,619.30) 0.00 (469,619.30) 0.00 Purchase 08/23/2024 91324PDE9 750,000.00 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC

2.95 10/15/2027 96.379 4.19% (722,842.50) (7,866.67) (730,709.17) 0.00 Purchase 09/12/2024 66815L2T5 545,000.00

NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.11
09/12/2027

99.997 4.11% (544,983.65) 0.00 (544,983.65) 0.00
Purchase 09/25/2024 58769GAD5 295,000.00 MBALT 2024-B A3 4.23 02/15/2028 99.983 4.24% (294,950.35) 0.00 (294,950.35) 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2024 9128283W8 1,250,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY

2.75 02/15/2028 97.602 3.51% (1,220,019.53) (4,296.88) (1,224,316.41) 0.00 Total Purchase 5,400,000.00 (5,341,344.63) (12,163.55) (5,353,508.18) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 5,400,000.00 (5,341,344.63) (12,163.55) (5,353,508.18) 0.00

DISPOSITIONS
Maturity 07/09/2024 06367TQW3 (750,000.00) BANK OF MONTREAL 0.625 07/09/2024 100.000 0.63% 750,000.00 0.00 750,000.00 0.00 Maturity 07/15/2024 79466LAG9 (115,000.00) SALESFORCE INC 0.625 07/15/2024 100.000 0.63% 115,000.00 0.00 115,000.00 0.00 Maturity 07/15/2024 91282CCL3 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

0.375 07/15/2024 100.000 0.38% 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/15/2024 91282CCT6 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

0.375 08/15/2024 100.000 0.38% 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 09/11/2024 037833DM9 (750,000.00) APPLE INC 1.8 09/11/2024 100.000 1.80% 750,000.00 0.00 750,000.00 0.00 60 252

TRANSACTION LEDGER
City of Pittsburg | Account #10607|07/01/2024 Through 09/30/2024| Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Maturity 09/23/2024 4581X0DZ8 (895,000.00)

INTER-AMERICAN

DEVELOPMENT BANK 0.5
09/23/2024
100.000 0.50% 895,000.00 0.00 895,000.00 0.00
Total Maturity (4,510,000.00) 4,510,000.00 0.00 4,510,000.00 0.00 TOTAL
DISPOSITIONS (4,510,000.00) 4,510,000.00 0.00 4,510,000.00 0.00 61 253

TRANSACTION LEDGER
City of Pittsburg Liquidity | Account #10617|07/01/2024 Through 09/30/2024| Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/10/2024 912797LN5 1,500,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 06/12/2025 95.500 5.05% (1,432,494.69) 0.00 (1,432,494.69) 0.00 Purchase 07/31/2024 62479LP33 2,000,000.00 MUFG Bank, Ltd. - New York Branch
02/03/2025 97.325 5.29% (1,946,497.23) 0.00 (1,946,497.23) 0.00 Purchase 07/31/2024 9128283Z1 1,250,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY

2.75 02/28/2025 98.691 5.05% (1,233,642.58) (14,291.78) (1,247,934.36) 0.00 Purchase 08/22/2024 912797MP9 2,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 12/17/2024 98.400 5.07% (1,968,003.75) 0.00 (1,968,003.75) 0.00 Purchase 08/22/2024 912797LD7 2,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 11/14/2024 98.828 5.16% (1,976,550.00) 0.00 (1,976,550.00) 0.00 Total Purchase 8,750,000.00 (8,557,188.25) (14,291.78) (8,571,480.03) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 8,750,000.00 (8,557,188.25) (14,291.78) (8,571,480.03) 0.00

DISPOSITIONS
Maturity 07/31/2024 91282CFA4 (3,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

3.0 07/31/2024 100.000 3.00% 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/08/2024 912797GK7 (2,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY 08/08/2024 100.000 0.00% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/15/2024 912797KB2 (2,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY 08/15/2024 100.000 0.00% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 09/06/2024 21684XH82 (2,000,000.00)
COÖPERATIEVE RABOBANK
U.A., NEW YORK BRANCH

5.9 09/06/2024
100.000 5.90% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/15/2024 91282CCX7 (2,800,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

0.375 09/15/2024 100.000 0.38% 2,800,000.00 0.00 2,800,000.00 0.00 Total Maturity (11,800,000.00) 11,800,000.00 0.00 11,800,000.00 0.00 TOTAL
DISPOSITIONS (11,800,000.00) 11,800,000.00 0.00 11,800,000.00 0.00 62 254

TRANSACTION LEDGER
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639|07/01/2024 Through 09/30/2024| Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss

ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 07/10/2024 912797LN5 1,500,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 06/12/2025 95.500 5.05% (1,432,494.69) 0.00 (1,432,494.69) 0.00 Purchase 07/23/2024 3133ERMB4 1,000,000.00

FEDERAL FARM CREDIT
BANKS FUNDING CORP 4.25

07/23/2027

99.969 4.26% (999,690.00) 0.00 (999,690.00) 0.00
Purchase 07/26/2024 09290DAH4 530,000.00 BLACKROCK FUNDING INC

4.6 07/26/2027 99.997 4.60% (529,984.10) 0.00 (529,984.10) 0.00 Purchase 07/31/2024 62479LP33 2,000,000.00 MUFG Bank, Ltd. - New York Branch 02/03/2025 97.325 5.29% (1,946,497.23) 0.00 (1,946,497.23) 0.00 Purchase 07/31/2024 9128283Z1 1,250,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY

2.75 02/28/2025 98.691 5.05% (1,233,642.58) (14,291.78) (1,247,934.36) 0.00 Purchase 08/06/2024 69371RT30 560,000.00 PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP

4.45 08/06/2027 99.867 4.50% (559,255.20) 0.00 (559,255.20) 0.00 Purchase 08/14/2024 532457CP1 470,000.00 ELI LILLY AND CO 4.15 08/14/2027 99.919 4.18% (469,619.30) 0.00 (469,619.30) 0.00 Purchase 08/22/2024 912797MP9 2,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 12/17/2024 98.400 5.07% (1,968,003.75) 0.00 (1,968,003.75) 0.00 Purchase 08/22/2024 912797LD7 2,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY 11/14/2024 98.828 5.16% (1,976,550.00) 0.00 (1,976,550.00) 0.00 Purchase 08/23/2024 91324PDE9 750,000.00 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC

2.95 10/15/2027 96.379 4.19% (722,842.50) (7,866.67) (730,709.17) 0.00 Purchase 09/12/2024 66815L2T5 545,000.00

NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL
GLOBAL FUNDING 4.11

09/12/2027

99.997 4.11% (544,983.65) 0.00 (544,983.65) 0.00
Purchase 09/25/2024 58769GAD5 295,000.00 MBALT 2024-B A3 4.23 02/15/2028 99.983 4.24% (294,950.35) 0.00 (294,950.35) 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2024 90PARS$00 219,001.47 City of Pittsburg 1.000 0.00% (219,001.47) 0.00 (219,001.47) 0.00 Purchase 09/30/2024 9128283W8 1,250,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY

2.75 02/15/2028 97.602 3.51% (1,220,019.53) (4,296.88) (1,224,316.41) 0.00 Total Purchase 14,369,001.47 (14,117,534.35) (26,455.33) (14,143,989.68) 0.00 TOTAL
ACQUISITIONS 14,369,001.47 (14,117,534.35) (26,455.33) (14,143,989.68) 0.00

DISPOSITIONS
63 255

TRANSACTION LEDGER
City of Pittsburg Managed/Reporting Cons | Account #10639|07/01/2024 Through 09/30/2024| Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
Maturity 07/09/2024 06367TQW3 (750,000.00) BANK OF MONTREAL 0.625 07/09/2024 100.000 0.63% 750,000.00 0.00 750,000.00 0.00 Maturity 07/15/2024 79466LAG9 (115,000.00) SALESFORCE INC 0.625 07/15/2024 100.000 0.63% 115,000.00 0.00 115,000.00 0.00 Maturity 07/15/2024 91282CCL3 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

0.375 07/15/2024 100.000 0.38% 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 07/31/2024 91282CFA4 (3,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

3.0 07/31/2024 100.000 3.00% 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/08/2024 912797GK7 (2,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY 08/08/2024 100.000 0.00% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/15/2024 912797KB2 (2,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY 08/15/2024 100.000 0.00% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 08/15/2024 91282CCT6 (1,000,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

0.375 08/15/2024 100.000 0.38% 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 Maturity 09/06/2024 21684XH82 (2,000,000.00)
COÖPERATIEVE RABOBANK
U.A., NEW YORK BRANCH

5.9 09/06/2024
100.000 5.90% 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/11/2024 037833DM9 (750,000.00) APPLE INC 1.8 09/11/2024 100.000 1.80% 750,000.00 0.00 750,000.00 0.00 Maturity 09/15/2024 91282CCX7 (2,800,000.00) UNITED STATES TREASURY

0.375 09/15/2024 100.000 0.38% 2,800,000.00 0.00 2,800,000.00 0.00 Maturity 09/23/2024 4581X0DZ8 (895,000.00)

INTER-AMERICAN

DEVELOPMENT BANK 0.5
09/23/2024
100.000 0.50% 895,000.00 0.00 895,000.00 0.00
Total Maturity (16,310,000.00) 16,310,000.00 0.00 16,310,000.00 0.00 Sale 09/30/2024 90PITT$01 (8,374,649.57) City of Pittsburg 1.000 0.00% 8,374,649.57 0.00 8,374,649.57 0.00 Total Sale (8,374,649.57) 8,374,649.57 0.00 8,374,649.57 0.00 TOTAL
DISPOSITIONS (24,684,649.57) 24,684,649.57 0.00 24,684,649.57 0.00 64 256

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024
2024 Chandler Asset Management, Inc, An Independent Registered Investment Adviser.

Information contained herein is confidential. Prices are provided by ICE Data Services Inc (“IDS”), an independent pricing source. In the event IDS does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.

Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client’s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.

Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Source ICE Data Indices, LLC (“ICE”), used with permission. ICE permits use of the ICE indices and related data on an “as is” basis; ICE, its affiliates and their respective third party suppliers disclaim any and all warranties and representations, express and/or implied, including any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use,
including the indices, index data and any data included in, related to, or derived therefrom. Neither ICE data, its affiliates or their respective third party providers guarantee the quality, adequacy, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of the indices or the index data or any component thereof, and the indices and index data and all components thereof are provided on an “as is” basis and licensee’s use it at licensee’s own risk. ICE data, its affiliates and their respective third party do not sponsor, endorse, or recommend chandler asset management, or any of its products or services.

This report is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a specific investment or legal advice. The information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without notice. Any opinions or views expressed are based on current market conditions and are subject to change. This report may contain forecasts and forward-looking statements which are inherently limited and should not be relied upon as indicator of future results. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This report is not intended to constitute an offer, solicitation, recommendation or advice regarding any securities or investment strategy and should not be regarded by recipients as a substitute for the exercise of their own judgment.

Fixed income investments are subject to interest, credit and market risk. Interest rate risk: the value of fixed income investments will decline as interest rates rise. Credit risk: the possibility that
the borrower may not be able to repay interest and principal. Low rated bonds generally have to pay higher interest rates to attract investors willing to take on greater risk. Market risk: the bond market in general could decline due to economic conditions, especially during periods of rising interest rates.

Ratings information have been provided by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee its accuracy.

Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) reflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P, Moody’s and Fitch respectively. 65 257

BENCHMARK DISCLOSURES
City of Pittsburg | As of September 30, 2024
Benchmark Disclosure
ICE BofA 3-Month US Treasury Bill Index
The ICE BofA US 3-Month Treasury Bill Index is comprised of a single issue purchased at the beginning of the month and held for a full month. At the end of the month that issue is sold and rolled into a newly selected issue. The issue selected at each month- end rebalancing is the outstanding Treasury Bill that matures closest to, but not beyond, three months from the rebalancing date.

ICE BofA 1-3 Yr US Treasury & Agency Index
The ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury & Agency Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated US Treasury and nonsubordinated US agency debt issued in the US domestic market. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating (based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch). Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to maturity at time of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule, and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for sovereigns and $250 million for agencies. 66 258
259

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2231 - West Leland Road and Loveridge Road Phase II Rehabilitation as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 2231 - West Leland Road and Loveridge Road Phase II Rehabilitation (the “Project”) milled and overlayed, with hot mix asphalt, West Leland Road from Broadway Avenue to John Henry Johnson Parkway, West Leland Road from Crestview Drive to Railroad Avenue, and Loveridge Road from California Avenue to Pittsburg Antioch Highway. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded by a $2,410,000 One Bay Area Grant (Resolution No. 24-14420) and $1,940,000 of RMRA funds (Resolution Nos. 20-13859, 21-13988, and 22-14125) for a total approved budget of $4,350,000. After payment of all expenditures for staff time, design, construction, release of retention, and project close out, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project are $4,170,000. Any unspent funds should be returned to the source fund account.

An updated CIP Project Sheet is attached.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. 260

BACKGROUND
On November 18, 2015, the City was awarded the Metropolitan Transportation Commission One Bay Area Grant II in the amount of $2,410,000. On December 21, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-13859, approving an addendum to the 5-year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years (FY) 2019/20 through 2023/24, allocating $300,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project.

On June 20, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-13942, approving the Operating Budget for FY 2021/22, allocating $40,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project. On September 21, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-13988, allocating $1,100,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project. On July 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-14125, approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2022/23 through 2026/27 allocating $500,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project.

On November 29, 2023, twelve bids were received for project construction. Ghilotti Construction Company, Inc. was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a bid of $3,264,406.30. On January 16, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14420, accepting the One Bay Area Grant II.

On January 16, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14421, accepting the plans and specifications, declining to waive bid irregularity, and awarding a construction contract to Ghilotti Construction Company in the amount of $3,264,406.30. During construction, there was a total of four contract change orders issued in the amount of $306,206.65 for a total contract amount of $3,570,612.95.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
This project rehabilitated approximately 7.3 lane miles of two major arterial roadways. The Project was part of the Five-Year Pavement Management Plan with the primary goal to increase the City’s pavement condition index. Successfully completing this project on schedule and within budget was an important step to improving Pittsburg’s roadway network.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared by: Gabriel Piña, Associate Engineer
261
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 2231 - West Leland )
Road And Loveridge Road Phase II )
Rehabilitation As Complete and ) RESOLUTION NO. 24-
Authorizing the City Engineer to File a )
Notice of Completion )
WHEREAS, Project 2231 - West Leland Road and Loveridge Road Phase II Rehabilitation (the “Project”) milled and overlayed, with hot mix asphalt, West Leland Road from Broadway Avenue to John Henry Johnson Parkway, West Leland Road from Crestview Drive to Railroad Avenue, and Loveridge Road from California Avenue to Pittsburg Antioch Highway; and
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2015, the City was awarded the Metropolitan Transportation Commission One Bay Area Grant II in the amount of $2,410,000; and WHEREAS, on December 21, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 20- 13859, approving an addendum to the 5-year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years (FY) 2019/20 through 2023/24, allocating $300,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-13942, approving the Operating Budget for FY 2021/22, allocating $40,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on September 21, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21- 13988, allocating $1,100,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project; and WHEREAS, on July 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-14125, approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2022/23 through 2026/27, allocating $500,000 of RMRA Funds to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on November 29, 2023, twelve bids were received for project construction. Ghilotti Construction Company, Inc. was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a bid of $3,264,406.30; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14420, accepting the One Bay Area Grant II; and
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14421, accepting the plans and specifications, declining to waive bid irregularity, and awarding a construction contract to Ghilotti Construction Company in the amount of $3,264,406.30; and WHEREAS, there were four contract change orders in the amount of $306,206.65 for a total contract amount of $3,570,612.95; and
262
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including staff time, design, construction, release of retention, and project close out, are $4,170,000, and the estimated remaining balance will be returned to the source fund account.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and file said document with the office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
263
City of Pittsburg 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:
(OBAG II) Pavement Improvement 2231
Description/Justification:

The limits of work include Loveridge Road from California Avenue to Pittsburg-Antioch Highway, West Leland Road from Broadway Avenue to Serrano Way, West Leland Road from Crestview Drive to Railroad Avenue, and West Leland Road from Bailey Road to John Henry Johnson Parkway. This project will use a variety of pavement management techniques as appropriate to extend the useful life of the roadway as well as concrete work to upgrade ramps to current ADA standard regulations.

Supplemental Information:

In September 2021, the City was awarded OBAG II grant funding for this project in the amount of $2,410,000.

Project Category: Streets
Location: W. Leland Rd and Loveridge Rd
Project Manager: G. Piña
Project Priority: 1C – Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2024/25
264

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting the Plans and Specifications, Reallocating Unused American Rescue Plan Act Funds, Allocating Additional Funds, and Awarding Project 3080 - Pittsburg Premier Fields
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 3080 - Pittsburg Premier Fields (the “Project”) will construct a multi-purpose field with parking, landscaping, a traffic signal on West Leland Road, and walking trails near the intersection of West Leland Road and John Henry Johnson Parkway. If adopted, this Resolution will accept the project plans and specifications, reallocate unused American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) project funds, allocate additional funding, and authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Carone and Company, Inc.

FISCAL IMPACT
The bid proposal from Carone and Company, Inc., is for $5,038,000.

This item will reallocate unused ARPA funds from the projects listed below to the Project:
 $19,574 from Sports Tourism (Project 1804)
 $692 from the Police Department Servers Project (Project 3090)  $5,157 from the Police Department Electric Vehicle Charging Installation Project (Project 1802)
 $28,347 from the Citywide Electric Vehicle Fleet Implementation Study (Project 1800) Funding for construction will be provided by the following sources:
• $1,842,811 American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) (Reso. No. 24-14533) • $1,615,000 General Fund Surplus (Reso. No. 23-14317)
• $438,461 Measure M Surplus (Reso. No. 24-14533)
• $2,263,000 Parks Dedication Fees (PDF) (Reso. No. 24-14533) • $53,770 ARPA Reallocated with this resolution
• $557,000 FY 2020/21 General Fund Surplus Allocated with this resolution If approved, the total Project budget will be $6,770,042. 265
An updated CIP sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION
City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the plans and specifications, reallocating unused ARPA funds, allocating additional funding in the amount of $610,770 to the Project as follows; $53,770 from ARPA and $557,000 from Fiscal Year 2020/21 General Fund Surplus, and authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction contract for the Project with Carone and Company, Inc. in the amount of $5,038,000.

Staff recommends that the City Council allocate a construction contingency in the amount of $503,800 for unanticipated costs and contract change orders.

Staff further recommends that the City Engineer be authorized to approve contract change orders in an amount not to exceed 50% of the construction contingency, and the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed the approved Project budget.

BACKGROUND
On June 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14317, approving the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2023/24, allocating $1,615,000 of General Fund Surplus Funds to the Project. On September 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24- 14533 adopting the 5-year Capital Improvement Program, allocating $1,842,811 of ARPA funds, $438,461 of Measure M Surplus funds, and $2,263,000 of PDF funds to the Project.

On October 9, 2024, staff advertised the Project for construction bids. On October 31, 2024, construction bids were received and Carone and Company, Inc. was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a base bid of $5,038,000.

Staff received nine bid proposals for project construction. The bids have been checked for arithmetical errors, completeness, and conformance with the bid requirements.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
The general reallocation of remaining balances in ARPA-funded projects to other ARPA- funded projects was discussed at the October 18, 2024 Finance Management Subcommittee Meeting.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The Project aims to enhance community amenities by installing a new multipurpose field near the intersection of West Leland Road and John Henry Johnson Parkway. The project will install a multi-purpose field, a traffic signal, landscaping, irrigation, parking lot, and trails.

This project will create a much-needed space for community members to participate in sporting events within their hometown.

Projects 1904, 3090. 1802, and 1800 are complete and have remaining unused ARPA funds. In alignment with City Council priorities and the federal deadline to obligate all ARPA funds by December 31, 2024, these remaining funds can be used to offset costs of constructing the Project.
266
Staff received nine bid proposals for the construction of the Project. The low bid has been checked for arithmetical errors, completeness, and conformance with the bid requirements.

The bid proposal submitted by Carone and Company, Inc. was the lowest responsive, responsible bid.

ATTACHMENT: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet
Report Prepared By: Gabriel Piña, Associate Engineer
267
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting the Plans and Specifications, )
Reallocating Unused American Rescue )
Plan Act Funds, Allocating Additional ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Funds, and Awarding Project 3080 - )
Pittsburg 24-Premier Fields )
WHEREAS, Project 3080 - Pittsburg Premier Fields (the “Project”) is for the construction of a multi-purpose field, a traffic signal, landscaping, parking, and walking trails near the intersection of West Leland Road and John Henry Johnson Parkway; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14317, approving the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2023/24, allocating $1,615,000 of General Fund Surplus Funds to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 24- 14533 adopting the 5-year Capital Improvement Program, allocating $1,842,811 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds, $438,461 of Measure M Surplus funds, and $2,263,000 of Parks Dedication Fee funds to the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 9, 2024, staff advertised the Project for construction bids; and
WHEREAS, on October 31, 2024, nine (9) bids for construction of the Project were received; and
WHEREAS, Carone and Company, Inc. was ranked as the lowest, responsive, and responsible bidder based on the selection criteria with a base bid in the amount of $5,038,000; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council accept the plans and specifications; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council allocate $53,770 from ARPA and $557,000 from Fiscal Year 2020/21 General Fund Surplus to the Project; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a construction contract with Carone and Company, Inc. in the amount of $5,038,000; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends establishing a contingency in an amount of $503,800 for unanticipated costs and contract change orders; and 268
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 WHEREAS, staff further recommends that the City Engineer be authorized to approve contract change orders in an amount not to exceed 50% of the construction contingency, and the City Manager be authorized to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed the approved Project budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the plans and specifications, awards a construction contract with Carone and Company, Inc. in the amount of $5,038,000, authorizes a construction contingency in the amount of $503,800, authorizes the City Engineer to approve contract change orders in an amount not to exceed 50% of the contingency, and authorizes the City Manager to approve change orders for an amount not to exceed the approved Project budget.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg reallocates $53,770 of ARPA funds from the following projects to the Project:
 $19,574 from Sports Tourism (Project 1804)
 $692 from the Police Department Servers Project (Project 3090)  $5,157 from the Police Department Electric Vehicle Charging Installation Project (Project 1802)
 $28,347 from the Citywide Electric Vehicle Fleet Implementation Study (Project 1800)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg allocates additional funding in the amount of $557,000 from Fiscal Year 2020/21 General Fund Surplus.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

_____________________________
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
269
City of Pittsburg 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program

Project Title: Project #:

Pittsburg Premier Fields 3080

Description/Justification:

The project will be split into two phases. The first phase of the Project aims to enhance community amenities by installing one multipurpose field near the intersection of West Leland Road and John Henry Johnson Parkway. The project will construct one multipurpose field with trails circling the facility that connect to existing trails, traffic signal control intersection improvements, parking lot which will include lighting, landscape, irrigation, water quality features, site furnishing, tree plantings, and other amenities within the project limits. This project will create a mu ch-needed space for community members to participate in sporting events within their hometown. In the second phase the other two fields, restroom and sports highlighting will be constructed.

Supplemental Information:

PROJECT EXPENDITURES Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 TOTAL 1101 Staff Time 55,039$ 113,000$ 50,064$ 550,000$ 768,103$ 2122 Design 29,200$ 558,166$ 20,510$ 7,000$ 614,876$ 2281 Construction 71,146$ 4,212,100$ 1,488,554$ 8,659,498$ 14,431,298$ 2372 Administrative Overhead 1,429$ 113,000$ 50,064$ 550,000$ 714,493$ TOTAL 29,200$ 685,780$ 4,458,610$ 1,595,682$ 9,759,498$ 16,528,770$ PROJECT FUNDING Prior 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 TOTAL 298 1,896,581$ 1,896,581$
110 General Fund Surplus 1,615,000$ 557,000$ 2,172,000$ 304 Park Dedication Fund 2,263,000$ 2,263,000$
111 Measure M Surplus 438,461$ 438,461$
Unfunded 9,758,728$ 9,758,728$
TOTAL 1,615,000$ 5,155,042$ 9,758,728$ 16,528,770$

PROJECT FINANCING CURRENT PROPOSED
ARPA
Project Category: Parks
Location: Old Delta View Golf Course
Project Manager: M. Mena
Project Priority: 1E – Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 202 8/29
270

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2040 - 2023/24 Pavement Management as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 2040, 2023/24 Pavement Management (the “Project”) implemented various pavement treatments including overlay, three-layer treatment, cape seal, micro-surfacing, base repair, and crack sealing to rehabilitate local/residential streets. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded with $2,451,300 from the General Fund (Fund 110), $807,000 from RMRA (Fund 228), $650,000 from Measure M Funds (Fund 111), $500,000 from HUTA (Fund 203), and $147,141 from the CalRecycle Grant for a total project budget of $4,555,441.

The City entered a construction contract with Radius Earthwork Inc., for $4,015,421.42. The final construction cost for the Project is $4,336,248.21. After payment of all expenditures for design, construction, release of retention, and project close out, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project are $4,435,000. Any unspent funds pertaining to the Project will be returned to the source of funding.

The updated CIP project sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. 271

BACKGROUND
On April 16, 2024, the Project was advertised for construction.

On May 6, 2024, bids for construction of the Project were opened and Radius Earthwork Inc, was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a base bid of $4,015,421.42.

On May 20, 2024, the City awarded the Project to Radius Earthwork Inc.

On October 25, 2024, the contractor completed the Project.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
On December 15, 2023, staff presented the draft 5-year Pavement Maintenance Plan to the Infrastructure and Transportation Subcommittee. The Subcommittee provided feedback on the plan and approved a recommendation to prioritize “Zone 3” for the Project.

STAFF ANALYSIS
Project 2040, 2023/24 Pavement Management is part of the City’s long-term pavement management plan to maintain and rehabilitate the City’s street network. The Project has increased the useful life of local and residential streets, enhanced road safety conditions, and contributed to the goal of raising the City’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI) score.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet
Report Prepared By: Savon Reese, Associate Engineer
272

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 2040, 2023/24 )
Pavement Management as Complete ) RESOLUTION NO. 24-
And Authorizing the City Engineer )
To File a Notice of Completion )
WHEREAS, Project 2040, 2023/24 Pavement Management (the “Project”) rehabilitated pavement on various streets in the southwestern quadrant of the City near John Henry Johnson Park; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, staff advertised the Project for construction bids; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2024, construction bids for the Project were opened, two (2) bids were received, and Radius Earthwork Inc, was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder with a base bid in the amount of $4,015,421.42; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2024, the contractor completed the project; and WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project including design, construction, and staff costs are $4,435,000.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to execute a Notice of Completion and file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
273

City of Pittsburg 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program

Project Title: Project #:
2023/24 Pavement Management 2040

Description/Justification:

The City of Pittsburg has divided its pavement management plan into 10 zones. The project will use a variety of pavement management techniques such as pavement overlay, reconstruction, inlay, slurry seal, patch paving, base failure repairs, and crack sealing.

Supplemental Information:

On June 6, 2022, the city allocated $600,000 from the General Fund to the pavement slurry project which was in “suspense” mode. Once the 2023/24 Pavement Management Project was established the 2022/23 FY project funding re-activated.

Project Category: Streets
Location: Maintenance Zone 3
Project Manager: S. Reese
Project Priority: 1A - Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2024/25
274

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2987 - East Third Street Remediation as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 2987 - East Third Street Remediation (the “Project”) removed lead and petroleum contaminated soil at East Third Street and replaced it with suitable material. This Resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded by a $534,437 Department of Toxic Substance Control Equitable Communities Revitalization (DOTSCECR) Grant (Resolution No. 23-14324) for a total approved budget of $534,437. After payment of all expenditures for staff time, construction, release of retention, and project close out, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project are $342,000. Any unspent funds are requested to be returned to the source.

An updated CIP project sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
On June 19, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14324 accepting the $534,437 DOTSCECR Grant.
275
On June 6, 2024, staff advertised the project for construction bids. On June 27, 2024, the City received proposals for Project construction, and Innovative Construction Solutions was the lowest, most qualified bidder with a base bid in the amount of $329,739.

On July 15, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14512 accepting the corrective action plan and specifications and awarding a construction contract to Innovative Construction Solutions in the amount of $329,739.

During construction, there was a total of one contract change order issued in the negative amount of ($622.50) for a total contract amount of $329,116.50.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The Project was for the removal of lead and petroleum contaminated soil at East Third Street. Lead and petroleum can be toxic to both humans and the environment. Lead can cause a variety of health issues including impaired cognitive function, hypertension, renal disease, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. Petroleum is also a toxic pollutant that can cause health issues including throat and stomach irritation, difficulty breathing, and pneumonia. For these reasons it was critical that the Project remove the contaminated soil to protect the health and wellbeing of the Pittsburg community.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared by: Gabriel Piña, Associate Engineer
276
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 2987- East Third )
Street Remediation as Complete and ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Authorizing the City Engineer to File a )
Notice of Completion )
WHEREAS, Project 2987 - East Third Street Remediation (the “Project”) removed lead and petroleum contaminated soil at East Third Street and replaced it with suitable material; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14324, accepting the $534,437 Department of Toxic Substance Control Equitable Communities Revitalization (DOTSCECR) Grant; and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2024, staff advertised the project for construction bids; and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2024, the City received proposals for project construction, and Innovative Construction Solutions was the lowest, most qualified bidder with a base bid in the amount of $329,739; and
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14512, accepting the corrective action plan and specifications and awarding a construction contract to Innovative Construction Solutions in the amount of $329,739; and WHEREAS, there was one contract change order in the negative amount of ($622.50) for a total contract amount of $329,116.50; and
WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, construction, and staff costs are $342,000, and the estimated remaining balance will be returned to the funding source.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof. 277
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
278
City of Pittsburg 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:

East 3rd Street Remediation 2987
Description/Justification:

This project includes remediation design and remediation of four City-owned parcels on 3 rd Street. (APNs 073-010-005, 073- 010-004, 073-010-003, 073-010-002).

Supplemental Information:

The City has been granted $1.1 million in US EPA Brownfield funding through a $300,000 Assessment Grant and an $800,000 Multipurpose Grant. In September 2022, the City expended the full Assessment Grant and closed it out. Under the Assessment Grant, the City conducted Phase II investigations of four City-owned parcels and has received approval from the EPA to move forward with remediation design on the parcels. Under the Multipurpose Grant, remediation of at least one City-owned site is required by the grant term end: September 30, 2025.

In 2022, the City applied for a DTSC ECRG grant for $544,438 to conduct the remediation, and was selected for funding in April 2023. The City has accepted the funding and executed a Grant Agreement.

In August 2021, the City Council approved a $374,000 contract with TRC for services including but not limited to Cleanup Preparation Services and Corrective Action Plans, and on November 6 th an Amendment to the contract to include bid and construction support. About $50,000 of this contract can be attributed to activities at this site.

Project Category: General
Location: 495 E. 3rd Street
Project Manager: S. Bellafronte
Project Priority: 1A - Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2024/25
279

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a First Amendment to an Agreement with the California Department of Transportation for Project 2019 BART Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 2019 BART Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity (the “Project”) is for the construction of pedestrian and bicycle pathways to provide better access around the Pittsburg Center BART Station This Resolution will authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment Number One of the Project Specific Pedestrian and Bicycle Maintenance Agreement (PSMA) with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) per the attached revisions as specified in the Amendment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact with the authorization of this Agreement. Once the pedestrian and bicycle pathways are complete, the City will assume responsibility for their continued maintenance.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment Number One of the PSMA for the Project.

BACKGROUND
On September 25, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-10643, authorizing the City Manager to execute the Freeway Maintenance Agreement clarifying the City’s and Caltrans’ maintenance responsibilities of relocated or reconstructed portions of local roads and appurtenant facilities.
280
Between December 18, 2019, and September 5, 2022, staff and design consultants coordinated with Caltrans to develop the PSMA, Amendment Number One of the Freeway Maintenance Agreement, and the State Highway Relinquishment Agreement.

These agreements were prepared specifically to define the City’s and Caltrans’ maintenance responsibilities for pedestrian and bicycle pathway improvements constructed within the Project.

On October 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-14191, authorizing the City Manager to execute the PSMA, Amendment Number One of the Freeway Maintenance Agreement, and a State Highway Relinquishment Agreement. On October 10, 2024, staff and Caltrans finalized Amendment Number One to the PSMA which updated the attached exhibits to the agreement.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not presented to a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
In order to construct the Class 1 bicycle and pedestrian facility along California Avenue in Caltrans rights-of-way (ROW), a PSMA was necessary to define maintenance responsibilities of the new facility. After the PSMA was approved, City staff modified the design of the improvements in Caltrans ROW to remove the wide parking area on the south side of California Avenue and install storm water bioretention. This Amendment One to the PSMA will clarify the approval of the revised plans by Caltrans and designate the City as being responsible for the continued maintenance of all the improvements, including the bioretention areas.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Amendment No. 1 to Project Specific Maintenance Agreement Report Prepared By: Khristin Labao, Associate Engineer
281
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Authorizing the Execution of a First )
Amendment to an Agreement with the )
California Department of Transportation for ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Project 2019, BART Pedestrian & Bicycle )
Connectivity )
WHEREAS, Project 2019-BART Pedestrian & Bicycle Connectivity (the “Project”) is for the construction of pedestrian and bicycle pathways to provide better access around the Pittsburg Center BART Station; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06- 10643, authorizing the City Manager to execute the Freeway Maintenance Agreement clarifying the City’s and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) maintenance responsibilities of relocated or reconstructed portions of local roads and appurtenant facilities; and
WHEREAS, on October 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22- 14191, authorizing the City Manager to execute the Project Specific Pedestrian and Bicycle Maintenance Agreement (PSMA), Amendment Number One of the Freeway Maintenance Agreement, and a State Highway Relinquishment Agreement; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2024, Caltrans finalized Amendment Number One to the PSMA; and
WHEREAS, these agreements are prepared specifically to define maintenance responsibilities for pedestrian and bicycle pathway improvements constructed within the Project; and
WHEREAS, once all agreements are executed, Caltrans will finalize approval of the design plan submittals and authorize the release funding for Project construction.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment Number One of the PSMA with Caltrans for Project 2019-BART Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity. 282
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
_____________________________
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
283
Amendment No. 1
04-CC-PM 23.0/24.4

1 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO

PROJECT SPECIFIC PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

WITH CITY OF PITTSBURG

This Amendment Number 1 to the Freeway Maintenance Agreement identified below (AMENDMENT), entered into and effective on ____________________, is between the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as (“STATE”), and City of Pittsburg, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as (“CITY”), acting by and through its Mayor. CITY and STATE together are hereafter referred to as “PARTIES”.

RECITALS:

1. PARTIES, entered into an agreement on November 10, 2022, entitled “ Project Specific Maintenance Agreement with City of Pittsburg ” hereafter referred to as (“AGREEMENT”), AGREEMENT defined the terms and conditions applicable to CITY’s maintenance duties of pedestrians and bicycle paths between Railroad Avenue and Harbor Streets and from eastbound onramp between Railroad Avenue and e xisting BART parking facility on Bliss Avenue within STATE right of way along State Route 4, as shown in Exhibit “A” of AGREEMENT.

2. AGREEMENT by its terms provides that it may be modified and amended at any time upon mutual consent of the PARTIES.

3. The purpose of this AMENDMENT is to assign and expand the maintenance responsibilities of bioretention areas on California Avenue.

4. PARTIES to amend AGREEMENT as provided herein.

IT IS THEREFORE MUTUALLY AGREED:

5. Existing Article 5.11 is deleted and New Article 5.11 is hereby added and made a part of AGREEMENT to read as follows:

“5.11.ROADWAY SECTION – CALIFORNIA AVENUE
CITY will maintain, at CITY expense, all portions of city streets, appurtenant structures, drainage facilities, bioretention areas and bordering areas, within the designated areas on the attached maps marked EXHIBIT “A”. City will maintain, at CITY expense, a safe facility for bicycle travel along the entire length of the roadways by providing sweeping, graffiti and debris removal when necessary; and all signing and striping, crosswalks, non- STATE standard materials, and pavement markings required for the direction and operation of the roadways.”

6. EXHIBIT “A” is hereby deleted and replaced by EXHIBIT “A” (REVISION 1).

7. EXHIBIT “A”; Sheet 2 is hereby deleted and replaced by EXHIBIT “A”; Sheet 2 (REVISION 1).

284
Amendment No. 1
04-CC-PM 23.0/24.4

2 8. EXHIBIT “A”; Sheet 4 is hereby deleted and replaced by EXHIBIT “A”; Sheet 4 (REVISION 1).

9. EXHIBIT “A”; Sheet 5 is hereby deleted and replaced by EXHIBIT “A” ; Sheet 5 (REVISION 1). In all other respects, AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect.

10. All other terms and conditions of AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect.

11. AMENDMENT is hereby deemed to be included and made a part of AGREEMENT.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, PARTIES hereto have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written.

THE CITY OF PITTSBURG STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATON

By: ______________________________

JUAN ANTONIO BANALES
City Mayor

Initiated and Approved:

By: ______________________________

By: ______________________________

GARRETT EVANS
City Manager

ATTEST:

LEAH BUDU Date
Deputy District Director
Maintenance

By: _______________________________
ALICE E. EVENSON
City Clerk

By: _______________________________

DONNA MOONEY
City Attorney

285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 2205 – West Leland Road Street Lighting as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 2205 - West Leland Road Street Lighting Project (the “Project”) installed 30 new streetlight poles and luminaires on West Leland Road between Crestview Drive and Railroad Avenue. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded by $458,000 from HUTA Gas Tax (Fund 203), $277,330.80 from a deposit refund from Pacific Gas and Electric and $25,000 Park Dedication Fees (Fund 304) for a total Project budget of $760,331. After payment of all expenditures for staff time, construction, release of retention, and project close out, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project are $645,674. Any unspent funds are recommended be returned to the source.

An updated CIP project sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
On November 16, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 09-11333, establishing the Underground Utility District 2009-01 along West Leland Road from Railroad Avenue to Burton Avenue (the “District”). PG&E designed the underground mainline project and managed its construction, with funding from Rule 20A benefits (the "Rule 20A Project"). 293
Also in calendar year 2009, the City designed and installed City-owned street lighting facilities within the proposed underground utility district. However, these underground utility benefits did not apply to City-owned streetlights, requiring the City to fund the street lighting facilities within the District.

On January 17, 2012, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12-11766, authorizing payment of $300,000 to PG&E for the estimated cost of constructing the City-owned street lighting facilities. On March 21, 2016, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-13171, allocating $458,000 from the HUTA Gas Tax (Fund 203) to the Project for design and construction. The PG&E deposit refund in the amount of $277,330.80 was deposited into the Project account.

On December 19, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-13729 approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2019/20 through 2023/24 and allocating funds for several capital projects, including $25,000 from Park Dedication Funds to the Project for additional trail lighting on Crestview Drive. The allocation resulted in a new total Project budget of $760,331.

On October 28, 2020, West Valley Construction, the contractor for PG&E’s Rule 20A Project, submitted a proposal to the City in the amount of $381,478, to complete the City’s Street Lighting Project. On December 21, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 20- 13867, accepting specifications and awarding a construction contract to West Valley Construction in the amount of $381,478.

During construction, there was a total of one contract change order issued in the amount of $1,097.55 for a total contract amount of $382,575.55.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The Project improved lighting, increased overall visibility, and enhanced the safety for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. This project was significantly delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the supply issues it caused. All work has been inspected and determined to be complete.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Budget Summary
Report Prepared By: Andrew Peters, Assistant Engineer
294
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 2205- West Leland )
Road Street Lighting as Complete and ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Authorizing the City Engineer to File a )
Notice of Completion )
WHEREAS, Project 2205-West Leland Road Street Lighting Project (the “Project”) installed 30 new streetlight poles and luminaires on West Leland Road between Crestview Drive and Railroad Avenue.; and
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2009, City Council adopted Resolution No. 09-11333, establishing Underground Utility District 2009-01 along West Leland Road from Railroad Avenue to Burton Avenue (the “District”); and
WHEREAS, in calendar year 2009, the City designed and installed City-owned street lighting facilities within the proposed underground utility district; and WHEREAS, PG&E designed the underground mainline project and is managing its construction, with funding from Rule 20A benefits (the "Rule 20A Project"). However, these underground utility benefits do not apply to City-owned streetlights, so the City must pay for the street lighting facilities in the District; and
WHEREAS, on January 17, 2012, City Council adopted Resolution No. 12-11766, authorizing payment of $300,000 to PG&E for the estimated cost of constructing the City- owned street lighting facilities; and
WHEREAS, on March 21, 2016, City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-13171, allocating $458,000 from the HUTA Gas Tax (Fund 203) to the Project for design and construction. The PG&E refund in the amount of $277,330.80 was deposited into the Project account; and
WHEREAS, on December 19, 2019, City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-13729 approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2019/20 through 2023/24, allocating funding for several capital projects, including $25,000 from Park Dedication Funds to the Project for additional trail lighting on Crestview Drive. The allocation resulted in a new total Project budget of $760,331; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2020, West Valley Construction, the contractor for PG&E’s Rule 20A Project, submitted a proposal to the City in the amount of $381,478 for completion of the City’s Street Lighting Project; and
WHEREAS, on December 21, 2020, City Council adopted Resolution No. 20-13867, accepting plans and specifications, and awarding a construction contract to West Valley Construction in the amount of $381,478; and
295
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 WHEREAS, there was one contract change order in the amount of $1,097.55 for a total contract amount of $382,575.55; and
WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, construction, and staff costs are $645,674.28, and the estimated remaining balance will be returned to the funding source.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
296
Project Budget Summary
Project 2205, West Leland Road Street Lighting Project
Project Funding: HUTA Gas Tax $458,000
Deposit refund from PG & E $277,331
Park Dedication Fund $25,000
Funding Total $760,331
Project Expenditures:
$29,685
Design:
(Code 2122) Subtotal $29,685
Advertising $390
Miscellaneous:
(Code 1399)
Subtotal $390
Construction $381,478
Construction: Contract Change Orders $1,098
(Code 2281) Easements 16,843$
Equipment Purchases 130,382$
PG&E 49,061$
Legal 1,088$
Subtotal $579,949
Staff Design $10,000
Staff Time: $8,891
(Code 1101) Subtotal $18,891
Staff Design $10,000
Admin: $6,759
(Code 2372) Subtotal $16,759
Expenditures Total $645,674
Remaining Balance $114,657
Consultant Design
Staff Construction Management
Staff Construction Management
297

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving Contra Costa Transportation Authority's Measure J Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist for Calendar Years 2022 and 2023
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Contra Costa County Transportation Authority (CCTA) requires the City to submit a biennial Growth Management Program (GMP) Compliance Checklist to be eligible to receive a percentage of Local Street Maintenance and Improvement (LSM) Measure J funds. The Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist covering Calendar Years (CY) 2022 and 2023 is required to receive ongoing LSM funds for Fiscal Years (FY's) 2023/24 and 2024/25. If adopted, this Resolution will approve the stated checklist for CY 2022 and 2023.

FISCAL IMPACT
Upon approval of the Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist covering CY 2022 and 2023, the City will be due $1,142,001 in FY 2023/24 LSM funds, as well as FY 2024/25 funds (amount TBD – paid on anniversary of first-year payment).

RECOMMENDATION
City Council review and approve the attached Measure J GMP Compliance Checklist for CY 2022 and 2023 and authorize the Mayor to certify and submit said checklist, confirming compliance with CCTA's Growth Management Program.

BACKGROUND
CCTA is responsible for ensuring that local jurisdictions are in compliance with the Growth Management Program contained in Measure J, by requiring them to complete a biennial compliance checklist. The City must submit this checklist to receive allocation of FY 2023/24 and FY 2024/25 LSM Measure J Funds.
298

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not presented to a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
Staff has completed the attached GMP compliance checklist, determined that Measure J GMP requirements have been met, and is submitting review and approval by the City Council. If accepted, the checklist will be sent to the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for their review and approval. The City accepted GMP compliance checklist will first be reviewed by CCTA staff for completeness and then by two of CCTA's standing committees:
the Citizen Advisory Committee and the Planning Committee. After committee evaluation, the full CCTA Board will evaluate for compliance with the GMP. Upon approval of compliance, CCTA will allocate the City's Measure J LSM funds.

ATTACHMENT: Resolution
Report Prepared By: Nhat Phan, Associate Engineer
299

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Approval of Contra Costa Transportation )
Authority’s Measure J Growth Management )
Program Compliance Checklist for Calendar ) Resolution No. 24- Years 2022 and 2023 )
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority requires the City to submit a completed Measure J Calendar Year 2022 and 2023 Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist in order to receive its allocation of Fiscal Year 2023/24 and 2024/25 Local Street Maintenance and Improvement Funds; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the attached completed Contra Costa Transportation Authority Measure J Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist, covering the reporting period of Calendar Years 2022 and 2023.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby approves the submittal of the Growth Management Program Compliance Checklist to Contra Costa Transportation Authority for allocation of Local Street Maintenance and Improvements Funds for Fiscal Year 2023/24 and 2024/25.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
__________________________
_ Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
300

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 3019 - Reviving the Heart of Pittsburg Pride as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion
MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 3019 - Reviving the Heart of Pittsburg Pride (the “Project”) installed an Old Town gateway sign, a “PITTSBURG” sign, a pocket park, art installations, and landscape upgrades at various locations along Railroad Avenue to beautify the main corridor leading to the old town area. This resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded with $2,891,962 of a Clean California Local Grant (Resolution No. 22-14105), $388,000 of American Rescue Plan Act Funds (Resolution No. 23-14313), and $62,000 of General Fund Surplus funds (Resolution No. 23-14313) for a total approved budget of $3,341,962. After payment of all expenditures for staff time, construction, release of retention, and project close out, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project are $3,341,962.

An updated CIP Project Sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. 301

BACKGROUND
On June 6, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-14105, accepting the $2,891,962 Clean California Grant for the design and construction of the Project. On June 5, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14313, allocating $388,000 from ARPA funds and $62,000 from General Fund Surplus to the Project.

On July 7, 2023, staff advertised the project for bids. On Monday, July 31, 2023, construction bids were due to the City, no bids were received. The City then reached out to multiple contractors to submit proposals for the construction of the Project.

On Tuesday August 29, 2023, the City reached an agreement with CWS Construction Group, Inc. to construct the project with a revised scope. The revisions removed the installation of a precast wall, landscaping work, and earthwork. The total cost that CWS Construction Group, Inc. and the City agreed upon for the construction of the Project was $2,637,314.

On September 18, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14369 accepting the plans and specifications and awarding a construction contract to CWS Construction Group, Inc. in the amount of $2,637,314.

During construction, there was a total of three contract change orders issued in the amount of $125,461.35 for a total contract amount of $2,762,775.35.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The Project provided for the beautification of the main traffic corridor leading to the popular old town area. The enhanced and innovative signs, park, art, and landscape improves the aesthetic of the travel way and draws the attention of both residents and visitors. Since the improvements have been installed, many individuals have been seen taking and posting photos and interacting with the installations. These enhancements will facilitate community engagement and increase the overall experience for people visiting Pittsburg, leading to an increase in economic opportunities for the City.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared by: Gabriel Piña, Associate Engineer
302
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 3019-Reviving the )
Heart of Pittsburg Pride as Complete )
And Authorizing the City Engineer to File) RESOLUTION NO. 24- A Notice of Completion )
WHEREAS, Project 3019-Reviving the Heart of Pittsburg Pride (the “Project”) installed an Old Town gateway sign, a “PITTSBURG” sign, a pocket park, art installations, and landscape upgrades at various locations along Railroad Avenue; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-14105, accepting the $2,891,962 Clean California Grant for the design and construction of the Project; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14313, allocating $388,000 from ARPA funds and $62,000 from General Fund Surplus to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2023, staff advertised the project for bids; and WHEREAS, on July 31, 2023, construction bids were due to the City, no bids were received. The City then reached out to multiple contractors to submit proposals for the construction of the Project; and
WHEREAS, on August 29, 2023, the City reached an agreement with CWS Construction Group, Inc. to construct the project with a revised scope. The total cost that CWS Construction Group, Inc. and the City agreed upon for the construction of the Project was $2,637,314; and
WHEREAS, on September 18, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14369 accepting the plans and specifications and awarding a construction contract to CWS Construction Group, Inc. in the amount of $2,637,314; and WHEREAS, there were three contract change orders in the amount of $125,461.35 for a total contract amount of $2,762,775.35; and
WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, construction, and staff costs are $3,341,962.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof. 303
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
304
City of Pittsburg 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:

Reviving the Heart of Pittsburg Pride 3019
Description/Justification:

Building on the 2009 Railroad Avenue Specific Plan, the Reviving the Heart of Pittsburg Pride is a project that aims to beautify the Railroad Avenue corridor from Civic Avenue to 8th Street through landscaping, art installation, and park development.

Supplemental Information:

Funding Sources: Clean California Local Grant with 12.5% matching from coming from American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding. This project has received a 6-month grant extension and must now be completed by December 30, 2024.

Project Category: General
Location: Railroad Ave
Project Manager: G. Pina
Project Priority: 1A – Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion Date: 2024/25
305

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Amend the Purchase Agreement for Meter Supplies with Badger Meter, Inc.

MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Public Works employees maintain the City’s water meters and purchase the necessary supplies under an annual contract with Badger Meter, Inc. If adopted, the resolution will authorize the City Manager to amend the Purchase Agreement with Badger Meter to add equipment and increase the compensation amount for the purchase of water meters and related supplies for installation in new residential and commercial developments.

FISCAL IMPACT
None from this action. Sufficient funds are available in the Water Operations Budget (501- 44101-2403). For the purchase of meter supplies, this is an appropriate use of these funds.

RECOMMENDATION
City Council adopt the attached Resolution to add equipment and increase the compensation amount for the purchase of water meters and related supplies, making the total contract amount $384,000.

BACKGROUND
The City’s Public Works Department operates Pittsburg Water; a water system that distributes potable water to Pittsburg customers. A feature of this procedure includes a Badger Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) system, allowing for the diagnosis and reporting of accounts where there are leaks detected.
306
Public Works crews are updating existing outdated 1-1/2” – 2” meters, with Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) cellular meters, that assist in preventing water loss for both customers and the City. On September 16, 2024, the City Council approved Resolution No. 24-14541, authorizing execution of a contract with Badger, Meter, Inc. in the amount of $300,000 for updating these existing meters. Additionally, $84,000 is required to cover the costs of meters and related supplies needed for installations in new residential and commercial developments over the next year. These funds are specifically allocated for new meter installations only.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not presented to a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
Public Works department staff are transitioning to Badger AMI cellular meters and products to update and enhance the current water system, identify the detection of leaks earlier, and to provide a useful tool for water conservation. Badger Meter, Inc., (formally National Meter and Automation) is the sole product distributor for the City’s water meters. To continue enhancing the water system and maintain continuity within the system, the current contract amount with Badger Meter, Inc. requires an increase in the amount of $84,000. This additional funding will cover the initial installation of AMI meters in new residential and commercial developments throughout the City over the next year, while supplying funds for staff to continue maintaining existing and updating larger meters.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Report Prepared By: Alexandria Augustine, Public Works Administrative Assistant 307

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Authorizing the City Manager to Amend )
The Purchase Agreement for Meter ) RESOLUTION NO. 24-
Supplies with Badger Meter, Inc. )
WHEREAS, the Public Works department operates Pittsburg Water; a water system that utilizes meters to distribute potable water to approximately 19,640 residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional customers; and, WHEREAS, an Automatic Meter Infrastructure (AMI) system assists efforts of water conservation, improves system efficiency, and enhances customer service capabilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 24-14541 on September 16, 2024, authorizing execution of a contract with Badger, Meter, Inc. in the amount of $300,000 for updating existing meters; and,
WHEREAS, additional funds are needed to cover the initial installation of AMI meters in new residential and commercial developments throughout the City, while supplying funds to continue maintaining existing and updating larger meters; and, WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the Water Operations Budget (501- 44101-2403); and,
WHEREAS, Badger Meter, Inc., is the sole manufacturer and distributor for Badger supplies necessary to be compatible with the existing water system.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby authorizes the City Manager to amend the Purchase Agreement to amend the Purchase Agreement with Badger Meter to increase the compensation by $84,000, raising the total compensation to $384,000, and add the purchase of meters and related supplies dedicated to new residential and commercial developments.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
308

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Accepting Project 3118 - Corporation Yard Fueling System Replacement as Complete and Authorizing the City Engineer to File a Notice of Completion MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project 3118 - Corporation Yard Fueling System Replacement (the “Project”) upgraded the City’s fueling system at the Environmental Center and installed monitoring wells at the Corporation Yard to meet requirements set by the California State Water Resources Control Board. This Resolution will accept the construction contract as complete and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Project was funded by $400,000 from the Building & Fleet Maintenance Fund (Fund 621), $759,100 from the Water Operations Fund (Fund 501), and $759,000 from the Sewer Operations Fund (Fund 521) for a total approved budget of $1,918,100. After payment of all expenditures for staff time, construction, release of retention, and project close out, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project are $1,580,701. Any unspent funds are requested to be returned to the source.

An updated CIP project sheet is attached to this report.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the Project as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
On December 16, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-13729, approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019/20-2023/24 and allocating $400,000 from Building & Fleet Maintenance Fund (Fund 621) to the Project. 309
On October 18, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-14004, approving the Consultant Services Agreement for the design of the Project. On September 19, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22-14167, authorizing the purchase of a 12,000 gallon above ground storage tank from Petroleum Marketing Equipment (PME), and approving and allocating additional funds to the Project.

On June 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14318, approving the Five- Year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2023/24-2027/28, allocating an additional $239,100 from Water Operations Fund (Fund 501) and $239,000 from Sewer Operations Fund (Fund 521) to the Project.

On December 4, 2023, staff advertised the Project for construction bids. On December 21, 2023, the City received proposals for Project construction, and GEMS Environmental Management Services, Inc. was the lowest, most qualified bidder with a base bid in the amount of $991,213. On February 20, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14434, accepting the plans and specifications, allocating additional funds, and awarding a construction contract to GEMS Environmental Management Services, Inc. in the amount of $991,213.

During construction, there was a total of two contract change orders issued in the amount of $3,883 for a total contract amount of $995,096.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
The Project was for the enhancement of the City’s fleet capabilities by upgrading the fueling system at the Environmental Center. This included the demolition and removal of the existing 1,000-gallon gasoline tank and its associated fuel equipment. The upgraded above- ground storage tank, with a capacity of 12,000 gallons, has been partitioned to accommodate 8,000 gallons of gasoline and 4,000 gallons of diesel. The fueling system is a crucial infrastructure element that will provide a reliable fuel supply to the City’s vehicle fleet.

Additional components of the Project include new piping, a concrete tank pad, a concrete masonry unit wall, and an automatic sliding entry gate. Monitoring wells installed at the corporation yard are ongoing until the California State Water Resources Control Board requirements are met.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
CIP Project Sheet

Report Prepared by: Gabriel Piña, Associate Engineer
310
Resolution No. 24- Page 1 of 2 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Accepting Project 3118 - Corporation )
Yard Fueling System Replacement as ) RESOLUTION NO. 24- Complete and Authorizing the City )
Engineer to File a Notice of Completion )
WHEREAS, Project 3118 - Corporation Yard Fueling System Replacement (the “Project”) upgraded the City’s fueling system at the Environmental Center and installed monitoring wells at the Corporation Yard to meet requirements set by the California State Water Resources Control Board; and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19- 13729, approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019/20- 2023/24, and allocating $400,000 from Building & Fleet Maintenance Fund (Fund 621) to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 21-14004, approving the Consultant Services Agreement for the design of the Project; and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 22- 14167, authorizing the purchase of a 12,000 gallon above ground storage tank from Petroleum Marketing Equipment (PME), and approving and allocating additional funds to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on June 19, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 23-14318, approving the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for FY 2023/24-2027/28, allocating an additional $239,100 from Water Operations Fund (Fund 501) and $239,000 from Sewer Operations Fund (Fund 521) to the Project; and
WHEREAS, on December 4, 2023, staff advertised the Project for construction bids; and
WHEREAS, on December 21, 2023, the City received proposals for Project construction, and GEMS Environmental Management Services, Inc. was the lowest, most qualified bidder with a base bid in the amount of $991,213.00; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 24-14434, accepting the plans and specifications, allocating additional funds, and awarding a construction contract to GEMS Environmental Management Services, Inc. in the amount of $991,213; and
WHEREAS, during construction, there was a total of two contract change orders issued in the amount of $3,883 for a total contract amount of $995,096; and 311
Resolution No. 24- Page 2 of 2 November 18, 2024 WHEREAS, the total anticipated expenditures for the Project, including design, construction, and staff costs are $1,580,701, and the estimated remaining balance will be returned to the funding source.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Pittsburg hereby accepts the Project as complete and authorizes the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and file said document with the Office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, within 10 days from the date hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST BY:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
312
City of Pittsburg 2024/25 – 2028/29 Capital Improvement Program Project Title: Project #:

Corporation Yard Fueling System Replacement 3118
Description/Justification:

The fleet fueling system at the Corporation Yard is out of compliance per State regulatory requirements and needs major upgrades including new piping, fueling island, single wall tank replacement with above ground tanks, new dispensers, island cover and new Concrete pad. The new location of the above ground tank will be at the Environmental Center.

Supplemental Information:

None
Project Category: Building
Location: Corporation Yard and
Environmental Center
Project Manager: A. Ruiz
Project Priority: 1A – Essential
Project Status: Construction
Est. Completion
Date:
2024/25
313

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Resolution Authorizing California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act Funding Requests MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The State of California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) maintains a funding program eligible to cities and counties for projects that promote beverage container recycling and litter clean up. The funding applications require a City Council Resolution for the City to be eligible to receive this non-competitive funding.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this Resolution will provide the City of Pittsburg with an opportunity to receive approximately $18,000 annually in funding to implement activities related to beverage container recycling and litter reduction. Without these funds, the desired recycling programs in the schools and community would not be funded or would require the use of other City funds.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council adopt a Resolution authorizing the submittal of California Beverage Container Recycling and Liter Reduction Act Funding Requests in Fiscal Years 2024/2025 – 2027/2028, authorizing the City Manager to execute the application and necessary documents on behalf of the City, and authorizing the Director of Finance to receive and account for the funds provided.

BACKGROUND
The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, Section 14581 (a)(5)(A), requires CalRecycle to distribute funds to all eligible cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities. The goal of CalRecycle’s beverage container recycling program is to reach and maintain an 80 percent recycling rate for all California Refund Value (CRV) beverage containers - aluminum, glass, plastic and bi- 314
metal. Projects implemented by cities and counties will assist in reaching and maintaining this goal.

Each city is eligible to receive a minimum of $5,000 or an amount calculated by CalRecycle, on a per capita basis, whichever is greater. The per capita amount is calculated, based upon the population at the beginning of each calendar year, as stated in the annual City and County Population and Housing Estimates Report submitted to the Governor by the California Department of Finance.

Past funding from this program has benefited the community by providing collection containers for the high school, junior high schools and community college, as well as parks and City facilities. Products made of recycled plastic have also been purchased for education events including the annual Civic Pride Day and Green Footprint Festival celebrations, and the Adopt-a-Spot program. Education and media campaigns have also been funded.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not presented to a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
Based on population, the City of Pittsburg is eligible to receive approximately $18,000 in funding annually. To qualify to receive these funds the City must develop and implement pre-approved activities that meet specified criteria and adopt a resolution of authorization.

The criteria are as follows:
• Collection and recycling of beverage containers at large venues; schools, public areas, community areas;
• Public education or advertising promoting beverage container recycling and/or litter prevention;
• Beverage container/litter abatement in public places including community clean-up projects or other related activities involving the recycling of beverage containers; • Supporting AB341 Mandatory Commercial Recycling requirements.

Projects being considered by staff and pending approval by CalRecycle include purchasing recycling units at schools for the collection of bottles and cans as well as for public/community areas. Advertisement and supplies for Civic Pride Day, the Green Footprint Festival, and Adopt-a-Spot are proposed funding expenses as well. These projects support the City’s effort to reach the state goal of 75 percent recycling rate. The attached Resolution would authorize the funding request application and secure funds from Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to implement approved activities outlined in the Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act.

ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
Report Prepared By: Sara Bellafronte, Assistant to the City Manager 315

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Authorizing California Beverage )
Container Recycling and Litter ) RESOLUTION NO. 24-
Reduction Act Funding Requests )
WHEREAS, the people of the State of California have enacted the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act that provides funds to cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities; and WHEREAS, the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) has been delegated the responsibility for administering the funding program within the State and establishing the necessary procedures for cities and counties to obtain funds under the program; and
WHEREAS, per Section 14581 (a)(5)(D) of the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act, the eligible participant must submit the Funding Request Form by the specified due date and time in order to request funds from the CalRecycle; and WHEREAS, it is the City Council’s desire and direction that staff apply for these funds on a routine annual basis for the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 to 2027/2028 period provided this program funding remains available.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the submittal of Funding Request Forms to CalRecycle for the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act for the period commencing with the Fiscal Year 2024/2025 and ending with the Fiscal Year 2027/2028.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute all necessary forms for the purposes of securing payments, implementing and carrying out the purpose of the grants, and authorizes the Director of Finance to receive all awarded grants funds for the purpose of administering each program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pittsburg at a regular meeting on the 18th day of November 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:
____________________________
Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
316

OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
65 Civic Avenue
Pittsburg, CA 94565
TO: Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Garrett Evans, City Manager
SUBJECT: Adoption of a City Council Ordinance Assigning Zoning of Planned Development District to Properties Located Within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and Adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR) MEETING DATE: November 18, 2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On November 4, 2024, the City Council held a public hearing certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan (Specific Plan), adopting the associated CEQA Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and approving a Vesting Tentative Map for a 12-lot Major Subdivision on an approximately 76.38-acre site located on the eastern half of the former Delta View Golf Course, south of West Leland Road.

The City Council also introduced and waived further reading of an ordinance assigning zoning of Planned Development (PD) District to properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan. The ordinance is now ready for City Council adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT
One-time revenues related to construction permits and other development fees and exactions, as well as sales tax from construction, are anticipated with this proposal. There is no impact to the General Fund if this project is approved.

RECOMMENDATION
City Council to take the following action:

Move to adopt Ordinance No. 24-____ Assigning Zoning of Planned Development District to Properties Located Within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and Adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR). 317

BACKGROUND
The public hearing for this item was held at the City Council’s regular meeting on November 4, 2024. After the close of the public hearing, the City Council approved the requested Zoning Map Amendment to the Plan Area to change the zoning for properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Plan Area from IL-O (Limited Industrial with Limited Overlay) District to a PD (Planned Development) District. See Exhibit A of Attachment 1 (Ordinance) for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment to the Pittsburg Technology Park Plan Area.

Pursuant to PMC section 18.62.060(A), adoption of a Specific Plan must be processed concurrently with a Zoning Map Amendment assigning PD District zoning to properties located within the Specific Plan Area. See Exhibit B of Attachment 1 (Ordinance) for the proposed Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan.

SUBCOMMITTEE FINDINGS
This item was not reviewed by a subcommittee.

STAFF ANALYSIS
After the City Council holds a public hearing and introduces an ordinance on a given matter, approval of the matter is formalized by City Council adoption of the ordinance by a majority vote at a meeting no fewer than five days after the public hearing. The ordinance becomes effective 30 days after the date of its adoption.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Ordinance 24-____
a. Exhibit A – Zoning Map Amendment to the Pittsburg Technology Park Plan Area
b. Exhibit B – Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

2. City Council Staff Report dated November 4, 2024
Prepared by: Alison Spells, Associate Planner
318
Ordinance No. 24- Page 1 of 8 November 18, 2024

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG
In the Matter of:

Assigning Zoning of Planned Development )
District to Properties Located Within the )
Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area ) ORDINANCE NO. 24- And Adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park )
Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR) )
WHEREAS, on March 1, 2018, the 175-acre Delta View Golf Course ceased operations and closed; and
WHEREAS, on March 19, 2018, the City Council directed staff to explore the possible uses suggested by the public for the site, and to bring options back for further consideration; and
WHEREAS, on May 7, 2018, the City Council held a public meeting related to potential options available for reuse of the site. At the conclusion of that meeting, direction was provided to pursue both economic development and multi-purpose recreational opportunities, with the idea that economic development would help generate the funds needed to develop new diverse recreational opportunities for the community; and WHEREAS, the City subsequently entered into an Option Agreement with a developer for a conceptual technology park development on a portion of the former Delta View Golf Course which led to informational meetings in 2019 with the Land Use Subcommittee, Planning Commission and local residents; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2023, a Neighborhood Meeting was held at 2201 Golf Club Road for immediate neighbors adjacent to the proposed Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area (Plan Area) to ask questions and provide input on the proposal; and
WHEREAS, on March 22, 2024, Pittsburg Data Hub, LLC, filed Planning Application No. AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR) requesting: 1) adoption of a Specific Plan for the Pittsburg Technology Park, 2) assignment of Planned Development (PD) District zoning to properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area, 3) adoption of a Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision within the Plan Area, and 4) certification of an Environmental Impact Report for the project and adoption of associated findings and a Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program (MMRP); and
WHEREAS, the Plan Area is located on the eastern half of the former Delta View Golf Course, south of West Leland Road, at 2222 Golf Club Road in the IL-O (Limited Industrial with Limited Overlay) District. The Plan Area consists of three individual parcels totaling approximately 76.38 acres. Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 095-160-001, 095- 160-002 and 094-080-046; and
WHEREAS, all Specific Plans must comply with California Government Code Sections 65450-65457. These provisions require that a Specific Plan be consistent with 319
Ordinance No. 24- Page 2 of 8 November 18, 2024 the adopted General Plan of the jurisdiction within which it is located. Per California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 et seq.) the Specific Plan acts as a regulatory document which is required to be adopted by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the intended purpose of the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan (Specific Plan) is to establish a direct connection between the City of Pittsburg’s 2040 General Plan and opportunities for economic development. An overall goal of the proposed Specific Plan is to foster economic opportunities within the community by expanding the variety of technology-focused business park uses. The Plan Area is designated as “Employment Center Industrial (ECI)” in the 2040 General Plan. The Specific Plan would serve as the overarching policy document for the Plan Area and provide the necessary zoning and development standards for the development of a technology park on a portion of the former Delta View Golf Course; and
WHEREAS, objectives of the Specific Plan are to: 1) Develop a comprehensive buildout plan for the Plan Area that provides for technology park uses while incorporating essential infrastructure facilities, 2) Foster economic and employment opportunities within the community by expanding the variety of industrial, office, and technology park uses, 3) Enable the construction of industrial or office buildings that will be attractively incorporated into the landscape, while minimizing impacts to the surrounding natural environment and sensitive resources, 4) Identify and facilitate the installation and ongoing maintenance of water, sewer, drainage, and road infrastructure in connection with development projects in the Specific Plan Area, and 5) Establish guidelines and standards for building and site development aesthetics that create a distinctive and cohesive identity for the Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC) section 18.62.060(A), adoption of a Specific Plan must be processed concurrently with a Zoning Map Amendment assigning Planned Development (PD) District zoning to properties located within the Specific Plan Area. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map includes adoption of PD District zoning and adoption of the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan provides the framework for future development of the Plan Area and is intended to strengthen the existing economic opportunities in the City.

The proposed Specific Plan does not authorize any specific development proposal; rather, it is a framework document intended to guide future development in the Plan Area in a manner that is consistent with the vision, goals, and policies of the 2040 General Plan.

Future development proposals within the Plan Area would be reviewed for consistency with the proposed Specific Plan land uses, policies, and design guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan includes a list of Permitted Land Uses within the Plan Area for future development proposals. The permitted land uses are based on the “Employment Center Industrial (ECI)” land use designation in the 2040 General Plan and the IL-O Zoning District Overlay for the Plan Area. There are no conditionally permitted uses. All permitted uses would be subject to development standards and design guidelines, and land use entitlement procedures and actions outlined in the proposed Specific Plan; and
320
Ordinance No. 24- Page 3 of 8 November 18, 2024 WHEREAS, the 2040 General Plan contains several goals, policies and actions applicable to the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan would guide development for a diverse employment center on a vacant portion of the former Delta View Golf Course. The Specific Plan serves as a policy document with guidelines to develop a technology park. The Specific Plan would be consistent with the City’s goal of providing a mix and distribution of uses and use an under-utilized site consistent with General Plan Land Use Goals 2-1 and 2-4, Policies 2-P-3.1 and 2-P-4.1. The Specific Plan specifically fulfills policies encouraging the development and intensification of employment centers, including high quality, professional office campuses, business parks, and industrial parks, located in areas fully served by public facilities and services, located along major arterials with easy freeway access and with access from public transit, and accessible to bicyclists and pedestrians (Policy 2-P-4.2). Improvements to the City’s employment base through high-quality, well- paid jobs that attract the technology sector envisioned by the 2040 General Plan would also be implemented through the Specific Plan (Policy 2-P-4.5); and WHEREAS, consistent with General Plan Economic Development Goal G-6-2 and Policy 6-P-2.9, allowed uses within the Plan Area would facilitate economic development and employment in an area that is surrounded by supportive uses including residential and community commercial. The Specific Plan would re-purpose and revitalize the former golf course, which has been closed for over six years (Policies 6-P-2.11 and 6-P-2.14); and WHEREAS, a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) was prepared for the proposed project and released with the Draft Specific Plan for concurrent 45-day comment periods, that extended from July 3, 2024, to August 19, 2024. Written comments were accepted throughout the comment period and two public meetings were held on July 25, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the City received 12 comment letters during the 45-day review period for the Draft PEIR. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15088, the Final PEIR responds to the written comments received on the Draft PEIR. No new significant environmental impacts or issues, beyond those already covered in the Draft PEIR for the project were raised during the comment period. Responses to comments received during the comment period did not involve any new significant impacts or add “significant new information” that would require recirculation of the Draft PEIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; and
WHEREAS, the City prepared a Final PEIR for the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan project, dated September 2024, which includes the Draft PEIR, comments on the Draft PEIR, responses to comments on the Draft PEIR, and all revisions to the Draft PEIR for the Specific Plan project. The Final PEIR identifies the potential for significant effects on the environment from implementation of the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, all of which can be substantially reduced to less than significant through the mitigation measures identified in the Final PEIR; and
WHEREAS, PMC sections 18.16.020 and 18.62.070 identify the Planning Commission as the advisory body to the City Council on proposed changes to PD Districts of the zoning map, and requires that the Commission conduct a public hearing and determine, prior to making its recommendation, that: 1) the change proposed is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the General Plan 321
Ordinance No. 24- Page 4 of 8 November 18, 2024 and applicable specific plan; 2) a community need is demonstrated for the change proposed; and 3) its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice; and
WHEREAS, on September 10, 2024, after conducting a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10255, recommending the proposal in its entirety, including adoption of the Specific Plan and assignment of PD zoning to properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area; and
WHEREAS, on or prior to Friday, October 25, 2024, in accordance with Government Code sections 65090 and 65091, and PMC section 18.14.020.A - D, a “Notice of Public Hearing,” for the November 4, 2024, public hearing on this item was published in the East County Times; was posted at City Hall; and on the “Public Notices” section of the City’s website. The City also mailed the notice via U.S. mail to owners of property located within 500 feet of the Plan Area, sent the notice to local service agencies whose services might be affected by the proposed project, and to individuals who had previously filed a written request for such notice. Lastly, a copy of the notice was posted on www.nextdoor.com (“Nextdoor”) and was sent directly to all subscribed residents in the Nextdoor neighborhoods adjacent to the project site; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2024, the City Council held a duly-noticed public hearing to: 1) adopt this resolution certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, adopting the associated CEQA Findings of Fact and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and approving the Vesting Tentative Map for a Major Subdivision; and 2) introduce, waive further reading, and pass to second reading, an ordinance assigning zoning of PD (Planned Development) District to properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan; at which time oral and/or written testimony was considered.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pittsburg does ORDAIN as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings.

A. The City Council finds that each fact set forth in the preceding recitals is true and correct and incorporated by reference.

B. The Draft PEIR and the Final EIR certified for this project was prepared in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq, and that the Council has independently reviewed and considered the information contained therein. The City Council, in the exercise of its independent judgment, certified the Final PEIR in Resolution No. 24-14560.

C. Based on the City Council Staff Report entitled, “Adoption of a Resolution Certifying the Final Program Environmental Impact Report, Adopting CEQA Findings of Fact and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Approving a Vesting Tentative Map; and Introduction and Waive First Reading of an Ordinance 322
Ordinance No. 24- Page 5 of 8 November 18, 2024 Assigning Zoning of Planned Development District to properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area and Adopting the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR),” dated November 4, 2024, and based on all the information contained in the Planning Division files on the project, incorporated herein by reference and available for review in the Planning Division located at 65 Civic Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565, and based on all written and oral testimony presented at the public hearing, the City Council finds that:

1. Pursuant to PMC section 18.16.020, before the City Council makes its recommendation on an application for (1) a change of zoning district applicable to the subject property or (2) a change in the text of a land use regulation, it shall make specific written findings in accordance with PMC

18.48.030.

2. PMC section 18.62.060(A) states that a specific plan shall be processed at the same time as consideration of the application for reclassification to a PD district; this has occurred here.

3. PMC section 18.62.060(A) states that a recommendation of the Planning Commission to reclassify to a PD district must also include a recommendation for City Council approval of a specific plan. The Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan in Planning Commission Resolution No. 10255, adopted on September 10, 2024.

4. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment to reclassify properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area to a Planned Development (PD) District is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses and programs specified in the 2040 General Plan and the applicable specific plan in that:
a. The Plan Area is designated as “Employment Industrial Center (ECI)” in the 2040 General Plan. This land use designation is described in the 2040 General Plan as “fostering vibrant, diverse, and dynamic employment hubs that accommodate
technology, advanced manufacturing, logistics, and other sectors that generate substantial employment opportunities; uses may include administrative, financial, business,
professional, medical and public offices, business incubators, research and development, custom and light manufacturing, limited assembly, warehousing and distribution, data centers, technology and innovation, energy, hospitals and large-scale medical facilities, services, light and heavy automobile services, and supporting commercial uses”.
b. Permitted land uses within the Plan Area are based on the “Employment Center Industrial (ECI)” land use designation.

Each permitted use, such as, administrative, business and 323
Ordinance No. 24- Page 6 of 8 November 18, 2024 professional offices, financial offices, government/public offices and medical offices would be subject to the development standards and design guidelines and land use entitlement procedures and actions outlined in the proposed Specific Plan. c. The proposed Specific Plan would guide development for a diverse employment center on a vacant portion of the former Delta View Golf Course. The proposed Specific Plan serves as a policy document with guidelines to develop a technology park. The proposed Specific Plan would be consistent with the City’s goal of providing a mix and distribution of uses on an under-utilized site (Goal 2-1).
d. The proposed Specific Plan will identify and allocate adequate lands in strategic locations throughout Pittsburg to
accommodate and encourage employment growth, focusing on sectors that provide high-paid and high-quality jobs and continue to promote business development sites through Think Pittsburg and other local programs (Policy 2-P-4.1).

e. The proposed Specific Plan will encourage the development and intensification of employment centers, including high quality, professional office campuses, business parks, and industrial parks, located in areas fully served by public facilities and services, located along major arterials with easy freeway access and with access from public transit, and accessible to bicyclists and pedestrians (Policy 2-P-4.2).

f. The proposed Specific Plan will promote business development in a range of sectors that contribute to the local and regional economy, provide high-wage and skilled jobs for Pittsburg residents (Goal G-2-4).
g. The proposed Specific Plan will support office, business, and industrial land uses that will improve the City’s employment base through high-quality, well-paid jobs that attract the technology, energy, and industrial sectors desired by the community (Policy 2-P-4.5).
h. The proposed Specific Plan will facilitate attraction, retention, and expansion of businesses that meet the City’s economic development objectives and maintain a desirable climate for conducting business in and with the City (Goal G-6-2).
i. The proposed Specific Plan will encourage new businesses and project development under the Employment Center
Industrial land use classification (Policy 6-P-2.14).
324
Ordinance No. 24- Page 7 of 8 November 18, 2024

5. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment to reclassify properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area to a Planned Development (PD) District is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is proposed, in that allowable uses within the Plan Area are permitted within the IL-O Zoning District Overlay and would be regulated by the Site Design, Development Standards and Design Guidelines within the proposed Specific Plan.

6. There is a community need for the proposed Zoning Map Amendment to reclassify properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area to a Planned Development (PD) District in that future development consistent with the proposed Specific Plan: 1) would help achieve the objectives in the Economic Development Element of the 2040 General Plan by expanding business opportunities and encouraging employment growth as it improves the jobs/housing balance, 2) would create additional employment opportunities within the City and generate property and sales taxes on vacant, underutilized sites to help contribute to the City’s revenue stream and 3) would allow for employment-generating uses that follow the prescribed development standards and design guidelines within the proposed Specific Plan.

7. Adoption of the proposed Zoning Map Amendment to reclassify properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area to a Planned Development (PD) District would be in conformity with the public convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice, in that the proposed Specific Plan is intended to be a long-range planning document which provides a framework for future buildout and development.

SECTION 2. Amendment.

Based on the findings and the authority set forth above, the City Council hereby:

1. Amends the Zoning Map, as referenced in Pittsburg Municipal Code, Title 18 (Zoning Ordinance) section 18.04.020(C), to change the zoning for the properties located within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Area from IL-O (Limited Industrial with Limited Overlay) to Planned Development (PD) District zoning, as depicted in Exhibit A of this Ordinance; and

2. Adopts the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, as substantially presented in Exhibit B of this Ordinance.

SECTION 3. Effective Date.

This Ordinance shall be in full force and effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 4. Severability.

If any section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such 325
Ordinance No. 24- Page 8 of 8 November 18, 2024 portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.

SECTION 5. Publication.

The ordinance shall be posted and published in accordance with California Government Code.

The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pittsburg held on November 4, 2024, and was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the City Council held on November 18, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAINED:

ABSENT:

Juan Antonio Banales, Mayor
ATTEST:

Alice E. Evenson, City Clerk
326
Zoning Map Amendment
Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR)

CC - Community Commercial GQ
– Government & Quasi Public IL-O - Limited Industrial
RM - Medium
Density Residential OS – Open Space RS - Low Density Residential Fig. 1: Existing Zoning District
Unincorporated
Pittsburg
Technology Park
Specific Plan
“Plan Area”
Attachment 1 - Exhibit A
327
Zoning Map Amendment
Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan, AP-24-0028 (PD, SUBD, EIR)

CC - Community Commercial GQ – Government & Quasi Public IL-O - Limited Industrial

RM - Medium Density Residential OS – Open Space RS - Low Density Residential Fig. 2: Proposed Zoning District

Unincorporated
Pittsburg
Technology Park
Specific Plan
“Plan Area”
PD
PD
PD
328

PITTSBURG TECHNOLOGY PARK

SPECIFIC PLAN
November, 2024
Attachment 1 - Exhibit B
329

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Overview and Concept ............................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Plan Area Description ................................................................................................................ 1

1.3 Relationship to other City Plans ................................................................................................. 4

1.4 Specific Plan Goals ..................................................................................................................... 4

1.5 Specific Plan Authority ............................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................. 5

2.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2 Demographics ............................................................................................................................ 5

2.3 Community and Natural Resources ........................................................................................... 5

2.4 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................... 5

2.5 Existing Transportation and Circulation Standards ................................................................... 6

2.6 Existing Utilities and Infrastructure ........................................................................................... 6 Chapter 3: Land Use, Zoning, and Development Standards ................................................................ 7

3.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................... 7

3.2 Land Use ..................................................................................................................................... 7

3.3 Permitted Land Uses .................................................................................................................. 9

3.4 Site Design................................................................................................................................ 11

3.5 Development Standards .......................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 4: Design Guidelines ............................................................................................................. 13

4.1 Building Form/Massing ............................................................................................................ 13

4.2 Materials, Colors and Textures ................................................................................................ 13

4.3 Functional Elements ................................................................................................................ 14

4.4 Buffering and Screening ........................................................................................................... 14

4.5 Landscape Design ..................................................................................................................... 14

4.6 Fire Prevention ......................................................................................................................... 15

4.7 Signs ......................................................................................................................................... 17

4.8 Lighting ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 5: Natural and Biological Resources..................................................................................... 18

5.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 18

5.2 Habitat Conservation Plan ....................................................................................................... 18 330

ii Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

Chapter 6: Circulation and Mobility ................................................................................................... 20

6.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 20

6.2 Site Design................................................................................................................................ 20

6.3 Transportation and Circulation Standards ............................................................................... 20

6.4 Transportation Impact Analysis ............................................................................................... 20

6.5 Parking standards .................................................................................................................... 20

6.6 Pedestrian Circulation .............................................................................................................. 21

6.7 Bicycle Parking ......................................................................................................................... 21

6.8 Emergency Access .................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter 7: Utilities and Infrastructure ............................................................................................... 23

7.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 23

7.2 Water System ........................................................................................................................... 23

7.3 Sewer System ........................................................................................................................... 25

7.4 Storm Drain System/WQ Basins .............................................................................................. 25

7.5 Electrical System ...................................................................................................................... 28

7.6 Natural Gas System .................................................................................................................. 28

7.7 Telecommunications System ................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 8: Implementation ............................................................................................................... 29

8.1 Implementation ....................................................................................................................... 29

8.2 Conformity Determinations and Development Application .................................................... 29

8.3 Revisions to Approved Permits ................................................................................................ 31

8.4 Minor Modifications to the Specific Plan................................................................................. 31

8.5 Determinations of Similar Use ................................................................................................. 32

8.6 Amendments to the Specific Plan ............................................................................................ 33

8.7 CEQA Findings and Subsequent Review .................................................................................. 33

8.8 Performance Standards and Mitigation ................................................................................... 33 Chapter 9: Administration ................................................................................................................. 38

9.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................. 38

9.2 Responsibility ........................................................................................................................... 38

9.3 Severability .............................................................................................................................. 38

9.4 Interpretation .......................................................................................................................... 38

9.5 Adoption .................................................................................................................................. 38 Appendix A: Pittsburg 2040 General Plan Consistency .................................................................... A-1 331

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan iii

Land Use Element ......................................................................................................................... A-1 Growth Management Element ..................................................................................................... A-3 Urban Design Element .................................................................................................................. A-4 Economic Development Element ................................................................................................. A-4 Circulation & Transportation Element .......................................................................................... A-6 Community Health & Environmental Justice Element ................................................................. A-9 Recreation & Youth Element ...................................................................................................... A-10 Resource Conservation & Open Space ....................................................................................... A-11 Safety Element ............................................................................................................................ A-16 Community Facilities Element .................................................................................................... A-17 Noise Element ............................................................................................................................. A-18 Appendix B: Landscape Plan (Phase I Only) ...................................................................................... B-1 Appendix C: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ........................................................... C-1

List of Figures
Figure 1: Plan Area ............................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2: 2040 General Plan Land Use Map ......................................................................................... 3 Figure 3: Site Plan Concept .................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4: Phase I Landscape Concept Design ..................................................................................... 15 Figure 5: Fire Hazard Severity Zone ................................................................................................... 16 Figure 6: Impacted Vegetative Communities Map ............................................................................ 19 Figure 7: Utility Concept Map ............................................................................................................ 24 Figure 8: Hydrology Map ................................................................................................................... 27 332

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 1

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1 OVERVIEW AND CONCEPT
The purpose of the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan (Specific Plan ) is to provide policy and implementation actions for the development of an employment area on a portion of the former municipal Delta View Golf Course.

The Specific Plan is based on a concept for development of the area in three phases. Phase I is the development of a data center north of the Contra Costa Canal. Phases II and III cover land south of the canal and allow for the further development of the plan area as a dynamic employment hub and light industrial uses.

The Specific Plan provides a roadmap and multidisciplinary guiding principles for use in planning -related endeavors. This document incorporates a vision and goals for the area and sets development standards and guidelines for land use, site and building, public right-of-way, circulation, and mobility. Per California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 et seq.) the Specific Plan acts as a regulatory document adopted by ordinance.

1.2 PLAN AREA DESCRIPTION
This Specific Plan envisions redevelopment of the eastern half of the former municipal Delta View Golf Course, which is closed and currently vacant. The existing property is located in the City of Pittsburg (referred to throughout document as “City”) within Contra Costa County, CA.

The Plan Area is bisected by the Contra Costa Canal, which is maintained by the Contra Costa Water District (See Figure 1 : Plan Area) and is composed of two major project areas divided by the canal. The area north of the canal is 22.05 acres. The area south of the canal is 54.33 acres. The Plan Area does not include adjacent, deed-restricted land owned by Pittsburg Data Hub, LLC.

333

2 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

FIGURE 1: PLAN AREA

334

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 3

The City of Pittsburg’s 2040 General Plan was adopted by the Pittsburg City Council on May 6, 2024, under Resolution No. 24-14464. According to Figure 2-1 in the 2040 General Plan (Land Use Map), the land use designation for the Plan Area is “Employment Center Industrial.” Land use designations north of the Plan Area are a combination of “Low Density Residential” and “Public/Institutional.” Land use designations west of the Plan Area are “Park,” east of the Plan Area are “Utility/ROW,” and south of the Plan Area is vacant land outside the city limits under the jurisdiction of Contra Costa County.

FIGURE 2: 2040 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP

To achieve internal consistency between the 2040 General Plan adopted on May 6, 2024, and the City’s Zoning Ordinance, the City adopted Zoning Map Amendments, as required by Government Code 65860, on July 15, 2024 . One of the Zoning Map Amendments rezoned the Plan Area from “Open Space (OS)” Zoning District to “Limited Industrial with Limited Overlay (IL-O)” Zoning District to allow for employment- generating and light manufacturing uses with specific development regulations.

Zoning for properties surrounding the Plan Area is a combination of “Single Family Residential – 6,000 square foot minimum lot size (RS -6),” “Governmental and Quasipublic (GQ),” “Planned Development, Ordinance No. 92-1044 (PD-1044),” and “Open Space (OS)” Districts.

335

4 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

1.3 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CITY PLANS
The Specific Plan serves as an extension of the Pittsburg 2040 General Plan and can be used as both a policy and regulatory document. The Specific Plan was analyzed to ensure it is consistent with all elements of the 2040 General Plan. Appendix A details the connection between th e Specific Plan and goals and policies from the 2040 General Plan and Sustainability Plan.

1.4 SPECIFIC PLAN GOALS
To ensure the functionality, economic sustainability, appealing aesthetics, and community enhancement of the Specific Plan, the following goals have been established:

1. Develop a comprehensive Specific Plan for the Plan Area that provides for technology park uses while incorporating essential infrastructure facilities.

2. Foster economic and employment opportunities within the community by expanding the variety of industrial, office, and technology park uses.

3. Enable the construction of industrial or office buildings that will be attractively incorporated into the landscape, while minimizing impacts to the surrounding natural environment and sensitive resources.

4. Identify and facilitate the installation and ongoing maintenance of water, sewer, drainage, and road infrastructure in connection with development projects in the Plan Area.

5. Establish guidelines and standards for building and site development aesthetics that create a distinctive and cohesive identity for the Plan Area.

1.5 SPECIFIC PLAN AUTHORITY
A specific plan is a regulatory tool that local governments use to implement their general plan and to guide development in a specified area. While the general plan is the primary guide for growth and development in a community, a specific plan can focus on the unique characteristics of a special area by customizing the planning process and land use regulations for that area.

By law, specific plans are intended to implement a city or county’s general plan through the development of policies, programs, and regulations that provide an intermediate level of detail between the general plan and individual development projects. As vehicles for the implementation of the goals and policies of a city’s general plan, State law stipulates that specific plans can be adopted or amended only if they are consistent with the jurisdiction’s adopted general plan.

The Specific Plan is enacted under Sections 65450 through 65457 of the California Government Code, which authorizes local governments with certified general plans to prepare and adopt specific plans. The Specific Plan is adopted by the City Council by ordi nance and thereby establishes the zoning regulations for land use and development within the Plan Area.

The Specific Plan guide s land use and development decision -making processes for the Plan Area . The Specific Plan does not replace or augment building safety codes or other non-planning-related codes. All applications for new construction, substantial modification to existing buildings, and changes in land use within the Plan Area shall be reviewed for conformance with this Specific Plan. 336

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 5

CHAPTER 2: EXISTING CONDITIONS

2.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter documents the existing conditions in the Plan Area prior to the adoption of the Specific Plan, including demographics, community and natural resources, land use, transportation and circulation standards, and utilities and infrastructure.

2.2 DEMOGRAPHICS
The City of Pittsburg has over 76,000 residents. The population of Pittsburg is ethnically diverse with 42% of the population identifying as Hispanic or Latino, and the largest racial populations identifying as 24% White, 23% Asian, and 20% Black or African American, according to the 2020 Decennial Census. The employment rate is 59.3% and approximately 8.8% of the population lives in poverty, according to the 2022 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.

2.3 COMMUNITY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
The Plan Area is approximately 76.38 acres, including areas formerly developed as the Delta View Golf Club that were owned and managed by the City, as well as undeveloped grassland hill slopes to the south and southeast (see Figure 1: Plan Area). The Plan Area is located along the southern edge of the City and consists of rolling hills along the lower slopes of the eastern Los Medanos Hills.

The property just west of the Plan Area consists of other portions of the former golf course as well as the City of Pittsburg’s Stoneman Park, while lands to the south are owned by the Keller Canyon Landfill Company, and lands to the southeast are owned by Pacific Gas and Electric.

The land is vacant, and a majority of the site is undeveloped. There are some dilapidated former golf cart paths, existing structures, and a run-down parking lot from the previous Delta View Golf Course. The Contra Costa Canal crosses from the northwest to the southeast through the Plan Area. A bridge covers a portion of the canal. Elevations within the Plan Area range from approximately 68 feet to 290 feet above sea level, trending upward in elevation from the northeast to the southwest and the existing topography generally drains from the south to the north of the site (elevations ranging from 253 to 72). 3.2% of the land in the Plan Area is impervious.

2.4 LAND USE
The Plan Area is designated as Employment Center Industrial per the 2040 General Plan Land Use Map, shown in Figure 2.

To achieve internal consistency between the 2040 General Plan adopted on May 6, 2024, and the City’s Zoning Ordinance, the City must adopt Zoning Map Amendments, as required by Government Code 65860. One of the Zoning Map Amendments will rezone the Plan Area from “Open Space (OS)” Zoning District to “Limited Industrial with Limited Overlay (IL -O)” Zoning District to allow for employment - generating and light manufacturing uses with specific development regulations. 337

6 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

Land uses north of the Plan Area are primarily designated as “Low Density Residential ” in addition to parcels within ½ mile of the Plan Area that are designated “Public/Institutional” where Rancho Medanos Junior High School and Los Medanos Elementary School are located. The neighborhoods north of the Plan Area are mostly built on a gridded street network but are bound by State Route 4 (SR 4) and railroad tracks that limit connectivity. As a result, only a few roadways provide continuous connections. Land us es west of the Plan Area are primarily designated “Low Density Residential ” and “Park”. This area is primarily served by West Leland Road and neighbors the Bay Point community which is located within unincorporated Contra Costa County. Land uses east of and neighboring the Plan Area are designated “Vacant/Utility/ROW,” which are utilized by powerlines that interrupt and limit connectivity. The land use designations east of the powerlines are mostly “Low Density Residential” and “Institutional” until Railroad Avenue, which is mostly designated as “Community Commercial.” The land use designations south of the Plan Area are primarily “Open Space” and unincorporated Contra Costa County.

2.5 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION STANDARDS
The Plan Area is accessible by way of vehicular travel. The north side of the Plan Area is accessible via Golf Club Road, a Local Street. The west side of the Plan Area is accessible via John Henry Johnson Parkway, a Local Street.

The north side of the Plan Area is less than 1,000 feet away from the Delta De Anza Regional Trail, a multi- use hiking, bicycling, and equestrian trail, which can be accessed at Golf Club Road.

The City of Pittsburg is serviced by local and regional transit services provided by Tri-Delta, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), and County Connection. The Plan Area is accessible through Routes 388 and 390 and is served by bus stops at the intersection of Leland Road and Golf Club Road serviced by Tri -Delta Transit.

The Plan Area also has access to the regional transit services provided by BART through the Yellow Line served by the Pittsburg Center station, which is approximately a mile away. Lastly, the Plan Area has access to the regional transit services provided by County Connection through the Express Route 93X bus route served by two bus stops at the intersection of Kirker Pass Road and Castlewood Drive, which is approximately a mile and a half away.

2.6 EXISTING UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
See Chapter 7 for descriptions of existing utilities and infrastructure.

338

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 7

CHAPTER 3: LAND USE, ZONING, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

3.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter includes permitted land uses in the Plan Area. These uses are aligned with the “Employment Center Industrial” land use designation for the Plan Area in the City’s 2040 General Plan. These uses are also aligned with the overall goals of the Specific Plan in Chapter 1 and Goal 2-4 of the 2040 General Plan detailed in Appendix A.

This chapter also provides design review guidelines and standards for development in the Plan Area to establish a high-quality design and character that is thoughtfully integrated into the natural topography of the surrounding area. These guidelines include direction on site design, building form, materials, color, and landscaping to meet the intent of the Specific Plan while providing flexibility for constructability. There are instances where the term “shall” is used throughout this chapter to denote a design standard that is required. Additionally, the EIR connected to this Specific Plan includes mitigation measures that act as supplementary standards for certain uses. The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for administering the provisions of the Specific Plan and shall have authority to review and approve development projects that have been determined to be consistent with the objectives and provisions of the Specific Plan.

3.2 LAND USE
The Plan Area is designated as “Employment Industrial Center (ECI)” in the 2040 General Plan. This land use designation is described in the 2040 General Plan as “fostering vibrant, diverse, and dynamic employment hubs that accommodate technology, advanced manufacturing, logistics, and other sectors that generate substantial employment opportunities; uses may include administrative, financial, business, professional, medical and public offices, business incubators, research and development, custom and light manufacturing, limited assembly, warehousing and distribution, data centers, technology and innovation, energy, hospitals and large -scale medical facilities, services, light and heavy automobile services, and supporting commercial uses”.

The Specific Plan is based on a concept for development of the Plan Area in three phases. The Site Plan Concept is shown in Figure 3. Phase I is the development of a data center north of the Contra Costa Canal.

Phases II and III, south of the canal, allow for the development of a wide range of employment-generating commercial or industrial uses based on market conditions. The Site Plan Concept illustrates the estimated development footprint for each phase , and the circulation within the Plan Area that is described in Chapter 6.

339

8 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

FIGURE 3: SITE PLAN CONCEPT

340

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 9

3.3 PERMITTED LAND USES
The permitted land uses in the Plan Area are based on the “Employment Center Industrial (ECI)” land use designation. The permitted uses identified in the table below are subject to the development standards and design guidelines identified in this chapter, and land use entitlement procedures and actions outlined in Chapter 8.

Use Classifications Definitions
Administrative, Business, and Professional
Offices

Establishment engaged in the provision of executive,
management, administrative, consulting, or professional services, such as architectural, design, engineering, real estate, information technology and technology support, insurance, investment, legal, sec retarial, accounting, graphic arts, typesetting, desktop publishing, advertising, marketing, title insurance, bail bonds, travel, entertainment, collection, or personnel agency. This classification includes health program administration or management offic es and workspaces created for business incubators/incubation.

Data Center

A facility providing for the storage of networked computer servers and related hardware equipment typically used by organizations for the remote storage, processing, or distribution of large amounts of data.

Energy

A facility primarily comprised of mechanical and electrical spaces that will house energy production, energy conversion, and energy distribution equipment.

Financial Offices Financial institution, including credit union office or check cashing service, that provides retail banking services to individuals and businesses. This classification includes only those institutions engaged in the on-site circulation of cash money.

Government/Public Offices Administrative, clerical, or public contact office of a federal, state or local government agency, including postal facilities, together with incidental storage and maintenance of vehicles.

Medical Offices and Medical Testing Offices of state -licensed firms or organizations that provide human physical and psychological health services and resources, such as physicians, dentists, chiropractors, physical therapists, psychiatrists, psychologists, counseling and family planning services, optometrists, or acupuncturists. This classification includes only those facilities intended for outpatient medical services, and may include medical/dental laboratory incidental to the office use.
341

10 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

Use Classifications Definitions
Research and Development Services and
Production

Research and Development Services establishments are primarily engaged in industrial or scientific research, including limited product testing. This classification includes electronic research firm or pharmaceutical research laboratory.

Research and Development Productions establishments are primarily engaged in the research, development, testing, and controlled production and wholesale of high -technology electronic, industrial, or scientific products or commodities within an enclosed bui lding, but does not include uses that may be objectionable by reason of production of offensive odor, dust, noise, vibration, or storage of hazardous materials. Uses include biotechnology, film, and nontoxic electronic and computer component manufacturers.

Manufacturing (Custom and Limited)

An industrial activity involving the making of goods or products by manual labor or machine process, including incidental and related processing, storage, wholesaling and distribution.

Limited. Establishment engaged in the fabrication, assembly, processing, treatment, or packaging of finished parts or products from previously prepared materials within an enclosed building, excluding food and drug processing.

Custom. Establishment primarily engaged in on -site production of goods by hand manufacturing involving the use of hand tools and small -scale equipment. This classification may include the incidental direct sale to consumers of only those products produced on -site. Typical uses include ceramic studio, candle - making, boatwright, custom jewelry manufacture, ornamental iron works, cabinet shop, or stained/leaded glass studio.

Warehouse and Distribution (Interior and
Exterior Storage)

Establishment engaged in the wholesale, distribution and warehousing of goods. Uses in this category provide storage space for bulk quantities of commercial goods, or sell or arrange the sale of goods from suppliers to other wholesalers or retailers.

Establishments under this classification may sort, package and label products for distribution, but do not display merchandise or accommodate walk-in retail customers.

With Interior Storage. Storage and handling of goods and equipment is entirely within an enclosed building.

With Exterior Storage. Storage and handling of goods and equipment is entirely or partially outdoors, even if screened from public view. This classification does not include junk or vehicle dismantling yard, or disposal facility.
342

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 11

3.4 SITE DESIGN
The Plan Area is approximately 76.38 acres and is bisected by the Contra Costa Canal into two major project areas as depicted in Figure 3: Site Plan Concept. The approximately 22.05-acre area north of the canal is named Phase I and includes future development of a data center and corresponding Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and/or Pittsburg Power Company (PCC) substation. The approximately 54.33-acre area south of the canal is designated for future Phases II and III and designed to accommodate the permitted uses listed in section 3.3.

Carefully planned site design is an important element of all development projects. Site design should help ensure well-functioning and safe circulation a round the site and establish aesthetically pleasing developments. Controlled truck site ingress and egress and services areas located at the rear of buildings or screening from public view should be considered. Additionally, articulated building façades and integrated landscape treatments should also be considered.

3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The following development standards apply to all development projects within the Plan Area.

Property Development Regulations Feet
Minimum lot area (sq. ft.) 5,000
Minimum lot width 70
Minimum yards –
Minimum Front Setback 10
Minimum Side Setback 10
Minimum Side Setback (adjacent to an R or residential
PD district) 10
Minimum Corner side Setback 10
Minimum Rear Setback 10
Minimum Rear Setback (adjacent to an R or residential
PD district) 10
Maximum front yard (ft.) –
Maximum height* of structure(s) 99
Minimum height of structure(s) –
Maximum lot coverage 60%
Maximum FAR** 0.5
Minimum site landscaping 7%
* Height shall be calculated from the proposed finished grade to top of roof membrane. This excludes screening and architectural facades, i.e., parapet.
** Facilities owned and operated by a public utility shall not be included in FAR calculation 343

12 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

Estimated Development Capacity
Size (AC) Development
Capacity (Sq. Ft.)
Phase I 22.05 347,740
Phase II 29.29 368,551
Phase III 25.04 392,567
Total 76.38 1,108,858

344

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 13

CHAPTER 4: DESIGN GUIDELINES

4.1 BUILDING FORM/MASSING
The shape, size, proportions , and articulation of buildings contribute to the character of the Plan Area.

Designing appropriate attributes for these elements will help buildings blend into the natural character of the Plan Area and minimize the buildings’ perceived size.

Appropriate attributes for a building’s design elements that are visible from a public viewing area should include:
• Articulated building facades as well as varying colors and materials to reduce the visual bulk of the building.
• Accentuated entrances through projected or recessed massing or features such as an overhang. • Variation in roof lines or parapet height s. Note: Height shall be calculated from the proposed finished grade to top of roof membrane.
• Architectural accents such as cornices, trim around windows, grooves in walls, and accent bands can be used to create visual variation along building facades.

4.2 MATERIALS , COLORS AND TEXTURES
Building materials, colors and textures should be used to add visual interest to buildings while blending with the natural character of the Plan Area.

Building materials and color applications include the following:
• Exterior building materials should include one or more of the following: smooth concrete, textured concrete, masonry block with textured or sandblasted finishes, glass and curtainwall glazing systems, natural and/or manufactured stone, or limited metal panel systems. • Primary exterior building colors are encouraged to be light and warm tones. Darker and more intense colors should be utilized for accents and to accentuate entrances. • Materials changes should occur at intersecting planes, preferably at the corners of wall plane changes or where architectural elements intersect. Material changes can also occur elsewhere within wall planes.
• Materials or color applications should terminate at a logical point in relation to architectural features or massing.
• Multiple buildings in a development should have complementary materials and color palettes. • Should creating defensible space per section 3.6.5 of this Specific Plan prove challenging to achieve, then structures must be constructed using fire-resistant materials. 345

14 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

4.3 FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS
Security fencing of 8-feet in height or higher may be installed at the perimeter of the property line of each development project.

Where incorporated in landscape design, walls and fences should be designed to complement building materials and colors where feasible.

Guard stations are permitted at the entrances to private drives.

4.4 BUFFERING AND SCREENING
Rooftop, ground equipment, and truck docks shall be screened from the view of adjacent residential districts. Screening materials shall be consistent wit h building facades and may include fencing landscaping.

4.5 LANDSCAPE DESIGN
Landscaping is a required component of each development project. Landscape design is intended to enhance site development and cultivate a vibrant and inviting environment that includes green spaces for passive use. Specifically, landscape design should:
• Be used to soften the appearance of buildings and provide a buffer with open areas and the roadway.
• Blend with the natural environment.
• Include planting selection that follow City requirements and consist of predominantly drought- tolerant plants (reference City of Pittsburg Master Plant List). • Be integrated into storm water management including any required onsite detention. • Include ground cover that is designed to have 100 percent coverage within one year.

The landscape concept design for Phase I is shown in Figure 4 to provide further guidance on the landscape design for all phases of the Plan Area.
346

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 15

FIGURE 4: PHASE I LANDSCAPE CONCEPT DESIGN

4.6 FIRE PREVENTION
Fire prevention is a key element of the landscape design and the continued maintenance of the Plan Area.

Future development and its landscaping shall be designed, installed, and maintained in accordance with Chapter 15.20 of Pittsburg Municipal Code (PMC), an amended version of the 2022 California Fire Code (CFC).

Phase I of the Plan Area lies within a wildland urban interface (WUI) zone. This is the zone of transition between unoccupied land and human development. Furthermore, the southern and eastern corner of Phase III is within a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) and is classified as a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ), see Figure 4. Additional measures including maintaining defensible space zones, landscaping using native, fire -resistant plants and fire -resistant materials, abating weeds, and, where feasible, harden structures and infrastructure against fires, are required for these areas and are specified in the CFC. Should the designated defensible space distances prove challenging to achieve, then structures within this zone must be constructed using fire-resistant materials and practices to mitigate potential fire risks.

Future development may be mandated to incorporate additional fire safety measures, such as fire - resistant roof construction, secure attachments, and other precautions, as part of the project's review by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District during future discretionary development applications and Building Permit review processes to ensure adherence to these code provisions.

347

16 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

FIGURE 5: FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONE

348

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 17

4.7 SIGNS
Signage in the Plan Area shall be subject to Sign Regulations in PMC Title 19. The purpose of PMC Title 19 is to provide standards to promote and protect life, health, property and the public welfare by controlling the design, colors, quality of materials, construction, size, location, placement and maintenance of signs and sign structures.

4.8 LIGHTING
Lighting in the Plan Area shall be designed to minimize impacts resulting from new sources of light and glare. The following lighting guidelines shall be incorporated in future development project s in the Plan Area:
• Maintain Dark Sky: Using fixtures that comply with dark sky principles and minimizing light pollution by preserving natural night sky will help maintain dark sky conditions. Best practices that help in maintaining dark sky and reducing glare include but is not limited to usage of:
o Lower lumen output luminaires and lower illuminance;
o Luminaires that spread luminance or brightness over an appropriate area; o Luminaires with less optical punch and less sharp cutoff in candlepower and o Luminaires delivering warmer color light (usually lower than 4000K, and often below 3000K CCT) (US Department of Energy 2013).
• Downward directed/shielded lighting: All lighting used in the Plan Area is required to be directed and/or shielded to prevent the light from adversely affecting adjacent properties, and no structures or features that create adverse glare effects are permitted. • Maximum luminaire height : The maximum permitted height of luminaires shall not exceed a height of 14 feet when there is no cutoff involved. If a ninety degree or greater cutoff is enacted, the maximum height shall not exceed that of 24 feet. Anything less than ninety degrees of cutoff, the maximum height of luminaire shall be 30 feet.
• Nighttime lighting : All parking facilities developed shall be provided with nighttime security lighting and designed to confine emitted light to the parking areas per PMC 18.78.050(F). • Incorporating Motion Sensors and Emergency Lighting: Incorporation of motion sensors or smart lighting in rest areas or areas that have more infrequent usage to optimize energy efficiency.

Inclusion of emergency lighting at key points such as areas with potential hazards.

349

18 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

CHAPTER 5: NATURAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

5.1 OVERVIEW
The Plan Area is approximately 76.38 acres, including areas formerly developed as the Delta View Golf Club, as well as undeveloped grassland hill slopes to the south and southeast. The Plan Area is located along the southern edge of the City of Pittsburg, California. The Plan Area consists of rolling hills along the lower slopes of the eastern Los Medanos Hills, overlooking the City of Pittsburg. Elevations within the Plan Area range from approximately 68 feet to 290 feet above sea level, trending upward in elevation from the northeast to the southwest.

The Plan Area is dominated by silt and clay soils that support annual grassland in undeveloped areas, though extensive areas have been partially leveled and native soils have been replaced by soils suited for golf course landscaping. The fine -textured soils within natu ral and excavated concave areas support seasonal wetlands. Natural swales and stream courses also run along the east edge of the Plan Area south of the canal, and two artificial ponds have been developed. Some of these ponds were developed entirely within uplands, while others are impoundments of natural drainages. The remnant intact drainages that flow through the Plan Area support a few riparian tree species, but these are widely scattered and include many non-native trees, and do not form contiguous riparian habitat.

The Specific Plan’s EIR describes the regulatory framework and mitigation measures in place regarding environmental protection. Ensuring the natural and biological resources in the Plan Area are adequately protected will help the City in their efforts to reach the goals laid out in the Sustainability Plan.

5.2 HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN
The Plan Area is subject to the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan & Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP) and its associated Regional General Permit (RGP). The Plan Area contains a limited amount of sensitive biological resources, including potentially jurisdictional Waters of the U.S./Waters of the State of California, and potential habitat for Endangered Species Act (ESA) and California Endangered Species Act (CESA) listed species (Refer to Figure 6: Habitat Map). Typically, these resources can require extended permitting and mitigation processes.

In the case of the Plan Area, however, a streamlined Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) permitting, and mitigation process is available through the HCP/NCCP. The HCP allows for relatively rapid and streamlined biological resource permitting, making the site well -suited to redevelopment. They also allow for mitigation to be provided by simply paying pre-determined mitigation and development fees, rather than the difficulty of establishing a mitigation site for the project.

350

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 19

FIGURE 6: IMPACTED VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES MAP

351

20 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

CHAPTER 6: CIRCULATION AND MOBILITY

6.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter describes the circulation plan and mobility standards and amenities for multiple modes of transportation, pedestrian circulation, parking standards, truck access, and emergency access requirements.

6.2 SITE DESIGN
The Plan Area is delineated into two portions: the north and the south, bisected by the Contra Costa Canal.

The north portion of the site , containing Phase I, includes a data center and corresponding substation.

The south portion of the site, containing Phases II and III, will be available for land uses as identified under Section 3.3 Permitted Uses. Conceptual building envelopes for permitted uses are shown on Figure 3: Site Plan Concept.

6.3 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION STANDARDS
The circulation plan, as included in Figure 3: Site Plan Concept, provides a roadway network to meet the vehicular and non-vehicular needs of employees and visitors as well as for the transportation of goods to and from the businesses located within the Plan Area.

Internal circulation and access for development projects within the Plan Area will be designed to facilitate efficient access to surrounding streets utilizing shared access points and driveways and separation of automobile and truck circulation. Internal site circulation will also encourage pedestrian circulation through an integrated sidewalk network that will be designed as part of implementing individual parcel and building development.

The roadway system on the Plan Area is meant to support movement of visiting vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists within the Plan Area.

6.4 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
Under the City’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, future development projects in the Plan Area may need to prepare a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) as part of the project approval process.

The purpose of the analysis is to assess the potential transportation impacts of proposed development projects, for purposes of both the CEQA and non-CEQA transportation evaluations.

6.5 PARKING STANDARDS
The following regulations establish minimum requirements and design standards for off-street parking of vehicles, trucks, and bicycles. The purpose of these regulations is to provide safe and convenient access, to ensure parking areas are properly designed, and to provide adequate spaces to service the use, reduce traffic congestion, promote business, and enhance public safety. 352

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 21

Parking Minimums
Phase I includes a data center with an adjacent substation and should therefore require minimal parking, as data centers require few on-site staff. There is no required minimum of parking spaces for this use.

Development projects within Phases II & III of the Plan Area are required to provide one off-street parking space per 500 square feet of floor area. Data centers are excluded from this requirement. The Zoning Administrator or their designee may allow a reduction in the minimum number of parking spaces at their discretion.

Parking Design Standards
Refer to PMC section 18.78.050 for parking facility design standards.

Additionally, development projects will be required to comply with the current, at the time of the application, California Building Code for certain design standards and procedures, including accessible parking space requirements and alternative parking programs. Additionally, future development projects will be required to comply with the current, at the time of application, California Green Building Standards Code “CalGreen” Tier 2 standards under the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) guidelines, and any other applicable State guidelines in effect at the time of application, regarding electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

6.6 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
Pedestrian paths are required from Golf Club Road to the main entrance of at least one building in each development project. Sidewalks are required on the west side of Golf Club Drive to improve safety and the pedestrian experience and provide additional connectivity. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of six-feet wide, constructed of concrete, and installed in conjunction with adjacent roadway improvements.

6.7 BICYCLE PARKING
Permanent, fixed bicycle racks or lockers shall be provided on-site wherever off-street parking spaces are required for commercial and industrial use classifications pursuant to PMC section 18.78.040, at the ratios indicated in the table below. The bicycle stalls required by this section may be covered by a shelter.

Off-Street Parking Spaces Required Number of Stalls for Bicycles Provided in Rack or Locker 0-4 0
5-10 1
11-20 4
21-50 6
51-100 8
101-200 10
201 or more 1 per 10 required automobile parking spaces 353

22 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

6.8 EMERGENCY ACCESS
Fire protection for the City of Pittsburg is provided by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD). Two Emergency Vehicle Access roads (EVA) are shown in Figure 3: Site Plan Concept. The Phase I EVA provides direct access from the proposed building to W Leland Road. The Phase II & III EVA provides additional access from Golf Club Road to W Leland Road.

Fire access within the Plan Area will abide by the CCCFPD’s Fire Prevention Standards. The Fire Apparatus Access Road Requirements state the following:
“Fire apparatus access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building constructed or moved into or within this jurisdiction. Fire apparatus access shall extend to within 150 feet off all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of a building as measured along an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. All newly proposed buildings, including single-family homes and accessory structures, shall be reviewed for fire apparatus access requirements by the Fire District prior to project approval.”

354

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 23

CHAPTER 7: UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

7.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter describes the existing utilities and infrastructure and the improvements required to support development projects within the Plan Area.

7.2 WATER SYSTEM
Domestic Water
According to the City of Pittsburg’s Water System Master Plan (WSMP), “ the City has two sources of supply: surface water from the Contra Costa Canal and groundwater extracted from two active wells in the central part of the City. Water from both sources is conveyed to the City’s water treatment plant where it is first treated, an d then conveyed to the distribution system. The City receives water from the Contra Costa Canal in accordance with an agreement with the Contra Costa Water District (CCWD).” The WSMP shows the site residing in Pressure Zone Section 2 with a high-water level (HWL) of 385’.

The existing domestic water infrastructure within the Plan Area is as follows:

1. Existing domestic water service remains at the Delta View Golf Course ; however, size and connections are unknown.

2. Two domestic water pipes , at 14” and 20”, run along the south side of Contra Costa Canal as shown in Figure 7.

3. Two domestic water pipes at 30” and 20”, run along the eastern face of the project. At the north end of the site, the 30” line turns west, with the final connection point unknown. The 20” line connects to facilities at West Leland.

4. City water treatment pump station s “PS-2” and “PS -3” exist outside the property limits further southeast off of Contra Costa Canal.

5. Adjacent to the pump stations PS-2 and PS-3 are existing water treatment storage reservoirs “T- 1” and “T-2”.

The WSMP speaks of future anticipated projects for the City water infrastructure. Within Pressure Zone Section 2, the WSMP shows a proposed transmission main from PS -2 to John Henry Parkway. Within Pressure Zone Section 1, the WSMP shows a potential proposed storage tank “T-19” further along Contra Costa canal with 1.30 MG capacity. A proposed 20” transmission line is proposed for the T-19 storage tank as well.

To bring water to the Plan Area , the utility design include s a proposed public water main along the proposed extension of Golf Club Road along the eastern edge of the Plan Area. Each building will have a domestic water lateral. Based on pressure data provided by the City, static pressure is understood to be between 129 pounds per square inch (PSI) at elevation 110’ and 107 PSI at elevation 161’. See Figure 7:

Utility Concept Map.

355

24 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

FIGURE 7: UTILITY CONCEPT MAP

356

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 25

Recycled Water
The City supplies its recycled water through the Delta Diablo Sanitation District’s Recycled Water Facility.

The recycled water is regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board, overseeing production, conveyance, quality control, and proper use of the recycled water. Recycled water lines service the Plan Area. Recycled water use at developments would reduce domestic water demand. Requirements for service will need to be evaluated at the entitlements stage of development projects.

Fire Flow
Static pressures are noted in the domestic water system above. Additional fire flow tests and modeling will need to be completed at the entitlement stage of development projects to confirm improvements necessary to meet development needs.

Subsequent projects within the Plan Area would be required to complete infrastructure studies for all new domestic and recycled water and wastewater lines. Furthermore, all subsequent projects will be reviewed by the City for adequate flows and pressure. Site-specific analyses would confirm the adequacy of water and wastewater system infrastructure, pressure, and flows.

7.3 SEWER SYSTEM
No major sewage line services the Plan Area outside of the existing sewer lines servicing the abandoned Delta View Golf Course. The existing sewer system connects to the City of Pittsburg public 8” PVC sewer main running along Golf Club Road. Development projects will require sewer main extension (potentially public or private) and service laterals to each proposed building, as shown in Figure 5: Utility Concept Map.

7.4 STORM DRAIN SYSTEM/WQ BASINS
The Hydrology Map (Figure 8) shows the existing hydrology of the Plan Area. The Plan Area contains stormwater infrastructure as it pertains to the Delta View Golf Course . It is likely that this infrastructure ties into the public storm water infrastructure along Golf Course Road. City records have not indicated stormwater infrastructure for the Plan Area within Phases II and III. Studies indicate the likely presence of a catch basin and storm drainpipe under the canal, transporting water to property north o f the canal, where it continues and discharges to the property/utility right-of-way.

Increase in impervious area from development projects and increase in runoff shall be mitigated with onsite detention to avoid downstream impact.

Future development projects are subject to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB) Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP). Particularly, future development projects must comply with the following NPDES Permit provisions:
• Provision C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment. Under Provision C.3 of the MRP, new and redevelopment projects that create or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface area are required to implement site design, source control, and Low Impact Development (LID) - based stormwater treatment controls to treat post-construction stormwater runoff. 357

26 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

• Provision C.12 – PCB Controls: Provision C.12 of the MRP requires the co -permittee agencies to implement a control program for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) that reduces PCB loads by a specified amount during the term of the permit, thereby making substantial progress towar d achieving the urban runoff PCBs wasteload allocation in the Basin Plan by March 2030.

Figure 8: Hydrology Map below shows the existing hydrology of the Plan Area. Increase in impervious area from development projects and increase in runoff shall be mitigated with onsite detention to avoid downstream impact.

358

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 27

FIGURE 8: HYDROLOGY MAP
359

28 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

7.5 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
There are existing transmission lines adjacent to the eastern perimeter of the Plan Area. Phase I includes future development of a data center and corresponding PG&E and/or PPC substation . Development projects will require the addition of electric infrastructure to be installed within the right -of-way with service lines connecting to the proposed buildings of the development.

As part of the design review process, future development projects shall be required to implement the following design concepts and best management practices to the extent feasible:
• Incorporate energy -efficient features through design concepts, including but not limited to, techniques for heating and cooling, building siting orientation, street and lot layout, landscape placement, and protection of solar access.
• Incorporate construction standards that promote energy conservation, including but not limited to, window placement, building eaves, and roof overhangs. • Incorporate enhanced energy conservation measures and other methods of reducing energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions.
• Large energy consuming development projects would be required to develop and implement an energy conservation plan to meet the operation’s full power demand. The energy conservation plan would be required to also include a monitoring program to ensure comp liance with and effectiveness of that plan.

7.6 NATURAL GAS SYSTEM
There is no existing gas infrastructure in the Plan Area, and no future development projects will be allowed the addition of natural gas infrastructure.

7.7 TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
There is no existing telecommunications infrastructure in the Plan Area. Development projects will require the addition of telecommunications infrastructure.

360

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 29

CHAPTER 8: IMPLEMENTATION

8.1 IMPLEMENTATION
The purpose of this chapter is to provide an outline of the steps necessary to implement the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan and applicable conditions, mitigation measures and regulations in coordination with the City of Pittsburg and other governing public agencies.

The Zoning Administrator shall be responsible for administering the provisions of the Specific Plan and shall have authority to review and approve development pro jects that have been determined to be consistent with the objectives and provisions of the Specific Plan.

8.2 CONFORM ITY DETERMINATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Applicant must submit a development application to the Planning Department for review and conformity with the standards and design review guidelines as outlined in Chapter 3. The Zoning Administrator shall review the package and provide a determination for consistency with this Specific Plan. Pursuant to PMC section 18.18.050, the decision of the Zoning Administrator can be appealed to the Planning Commission.

The following project types are not required to submit a development application but are still subject to PMC Title 15: Buildings and Construction:
(1) New development that is less than 10,000 square feet total and consistent with permitted uses (2) Routine maintenance, minor repair work, and replacement of existing structures The required information that must be included in the development application, pursuant to PMC section

18.36.210 includes:
(1) Site plan showing:
a) General location of property;
b) Property boundaries;
c) Existing topography and proposed grading (for property no less than 10 acres, a contour interval no greater than five feet and a horizontal map scale of one -inch equals 50 feet or larger shall be used; for property larger than 10 acres, a contour interval no greater than 10 feet and a horizontal map scale of one-inch equals 100 feet or larger shall be used); d) All existing and proposed structures, the height of each structure and number of dwelling units in each structure;
e) All existing and proposed signs;
f) Location and approximate height of all adjacent structures on abutting sites; g) Location, dimensions , and quantity of existing and proposed off -street parking, with a statement indicating whether it conforms to applicable regulations; h) Existing and proposed vehicular and pedestrian ways, and trails, with grades, widths , and types of improvements;
i) Proposed vehicular access between site and public street; j) Locations, names, and widths of abutting streets;
361

30 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

k) Existing and proposed utilities;
l) Existing and proposed recreational facilities;
m) Existing and proposed storm drainage facilities;
n) Location of existing trees on the site;
o) Locations and heights of existing and proposed retaining walls; p) Locations and dimensions of trash disposal areas;
q) Roof overhangs;
r) Distances between buildings and from building walls to property lines; s) Proposed street names;
t) Handicap facilities;
(2) Architectural drawings showing:
a) Floor plans at one-eighth inch or one-quarter inch equals one foot zero inches; b) Four elevations (or more if necessary) to include all sides of development at no less than one- eighth inch equals one foot zero inches;
(3) Landscaping plan, including plant names and sizes, and an irrigation plan; (4) A recent photograph of the site itself and of adjacent properties showing the current condition of the properties;
(5) Color and texture chips of actual samples of materials; (6) Additional information which may be requested by the planning commission including but not limited to the following:
a) Recent photographs of sight line profiles in sufficiently large scale, taken from commonly used vantage points in the city (shopping centers, road intersections, scenic lookouts, etc.) with the outline of the proposed structure in proper scale and perspective superimposed on it; b) Architectural drawings showing the locations, size, color, shape and type of illumination of each proposed sign;
(7) Other information as determined by the city planner.

The Zoning Administrator shall consider the development application for approval and integrate it with the land use approval process , detailed below . If the Zoning Administrator can make the following findings, they shall approve the development application and the Design Review Permit administratively:
(a) The project complies with all applicable development standards identified in this Specific Plan, the 2040 General Plan, and PMC.
(b) There is supporting infrastructure, existing or available, consistent with the intensity of development, to accommodate the proposed development.
(c) The proposed uses are in compliance with the Specific Plan, the 2040 General Plan and PMC. 362

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 31

The Zoning Administrator, or the Planning Commission in the case of an appeal, shall make written findings for its decision.

8.3 REVISIONS TO APPROVED PERMITS
Any subsequent changes to approved permits that would modify approved development permits, shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator as specified in Section 7.2. The Zoning Administrator shall determine whether the proposed modification to a previously approved permit is in conformance with the Specific Plan. If the Zoning Administrator determines that the proposed modification to the approved permit conforms with the Specific Plan, then the Zoning Administrator shall issue a Minor Revision to the previously approved permit without notification and without the need for a public hearing or the need to complete further review under CEQA.

8.4 MINOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
Minor modifications to the Specific Plan shall not require a Specific Plan Amendment and shall be subject to a “substantial conformance” determination, an administrative mechanism by which minor modifications to the Specific Plan that do not result in sign ificant impacts and are consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan shall be permitted without a formal Plan amendment process. The Zoning Administrator shall make determinations of substantial conformance ministerially without the need for a public hearing.

Minor modifications that satisfy the substantial conformance determination’s requirements may result from a final development project design and engineering that cause adjustments in roadway alignments, locations of utilities or other infrastructure, devel opment of innovative project design, distribution of permitted uses within the Specific Plan, application of design guidelines, or other similar modifications deemed to be minor and which implement the provisions of the Plan. Minor modifications or technic al adjustments may include, but are not limited to:
(1) Modifications necessary to comply with final conditions of approval or mitigation measures. (2) Addition of information to the Specific Plan for purposes of clarification that does not change the intent of any standard, regulation, or design guideline under the Specific Plan, as well as correction of any clerical or grammatical errors.
(3) Adjustments to the alignment, location and sizing of utilities or a change in utility and/or public service provider may be approved so long as the adjustments or changes are found to be in compliance with applicable plans and regulations of the agency responsible for such utilities and facilities.
(4) Changes in roadway alignment, width, or improvements through the final engineering/improvement plan process so long as compliance with minimum rights -of-way standards outlined in the Specific Plan is maintained.
(5) An adjustment of any land use district acreage of up to ten percent (10%) of the designated acreage.
(6) Minor adjustment up to ten percent (10%) of any quantitative standard such as heights or setbacks that are defined in Chapter 3 of this Specific Plan. 363

32 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

(7) Minor changes to the architectural design guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual in nature and flexible in implementation.
(8) Relocation of office space to other areas of the same building. (9) Modification of any design element that improves circulation, reduces grading, improves drainage, and/or reduces operations and maintenance costs. (10) Modification of the location of auto driveways, including adding additional auto driveways.

The minor modifications listed above are not intended to be comprehensive. Any modification that is deemed by the Zoning Administrator to be in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent of the Specific Plan shall be permitted.

The application for and documentation of substantial conformance shall include text and/or maps that describe the nature of the proposed modifications to the Specific Plan. Applications for modifications and their documentation shall undergo any necessary technical review by the Zoning Administrator necessary to determine if updated conditions of project approval are necessary.

8.5 DETERMINATIONS OF SIMILAR USE
When a property owner or applicant proposes or contemplates a use within the Plan Area not expressly authorized as a permitted use under Chapter 3, Section 3. 3, Permitted Uses, he/she may request a determination of similar use in accordance with the procedures set out in this section.

A request for determination of similar use shall be in writing and shall include the following:
(1) Name of requesting entity;
(2) Description of the proposed or contemplated use;
(3) Explanation of why the property owner/applicant believes the proposed or contemplated use is consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan and the operational characteristics and potential impacts of the allowable uses listed in Section 3.3, Permitted Uses.

Where a request for determination of similar use is submitted, the Zoning Administrator shall ministerially make the determination of similar use. In making this determination, the Zoning Administrator shall first make all of the following findings:
(1) The characteristics of, and activities associated with, the use are similar in nature to those of one or more of the uses listed in Section 3.3, and will not involve a greater level of activity, population density, intensity, traffic generation, parking, dust, odor, noise, emissions, or similar impacts than the uses listed as permitted in Section 3.3; and
(2) The use will meet the purpose/intent of the Specific Plan.

The determination of similar use by the Zoning Administrator shall be subject to appeal to the Planning Commission as follows:
(1) The requesting entity for the determination may appeal the decision of the Zoning Administrator on the request for determination of similar use by filing a written notice of appeal with the Zoning Administrator within ten days of their written determination. 364

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 33

(2) The Planning Commission may affirm or modify the determination of similar use by the Zoning Administrator.

When the Zoning Administrator determines that an unlisted land use is similar to a listed use in Section

3.3, the unlisted use will be treated in the same manner as the listed use in determining where the use is allowed, and what other standards and requirements of the Specific Plan apply.

8.6 AMENDMENTS TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
Specific Plan amendments are governed by California Government Code Section 6545 0 et seq .

Applications shall state the reasons for the proposed amendment.

An amendment to the Specific Plan is required in the event of any of the following:
(1) Changes to the overall Specific Plan boundaries, including an expansion of the Specific Plan Area. (2) A change in any other provision, purpose, or standard of the Specific Plan that would significantly alter the basic intent, spirit, identity, objective of the Specific Plan. (3) An increase in maximum building square footage.
(4) An increase in the overall development intensity thresholds within the Specific Plan.

8.7 CEQA FINDINGS AND SUBSEQUENT REVIEW
All subsequent developments consistent with the Specific Plan shall not require additional environmental review, as established under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15168 and 15183 - except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project -specific significant effects, which are peculiar to the project or its site.

Furthermore, pursuant to Section 15162, when an EIR has been certified, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence that there have been substantial changes in the project ; potentially new significant effects not previously disclosed, or new information , including changes in the setting or new mitigation not previously contemplated.

The City shall conduct an analysis under Section 15162 for all subsequent development applications within the Specific Plan area prior to requiring subsequent CEQA analysis.

8.8 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS AND MITIGATION
CEQA requires the adoption of mitigation measures to reduce the severity and magnitude of significant environmental impacts associated with project implementation. The Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for the proposed Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan includes mitigation measures to reduce the potential environmental effects of implementation of the Specific Plan. Below is a summary of the mitigation measures identified in the PEIR, which are incorporated by reference into the Specific Plan as performance standards in this section . The Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), adopted in conjunction with the PEIR, should be referenced for complete mitigation measure s, timing, and triggers for compliance. Additional mitigation measures may be applicable to the Phase I, through 365

34 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

project-specific environmental review conducted for the data center by the California Energy Commission (CEC).

AIR QUALITY
• Subsequent Construction Air Quality Analysis. Prior to approval of subsequent development applications by the Zoning Administrator, applicants shall provide a project-level construction air quality analysis per BAAQMD guidance to determine the significance of air quality impacts. • Use of Tier 4 Engines. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, applicants shall ensure that all offroad heavy-duty diesel -powered equipment larger than 100 horsepower meet s USEPA emissions standards for Tier 4 engines or equivalent.
• Enhanced BMPs for Fugitive Dust. To minimize emissions of fugitive dust, applicants of future development projects shall be required to implement the enhanced best management practices.

If a future development application includes a land use type that would generate diesel truck trips during project operation (such as logistics and warehousing), beyond what was estimated in the PEIR analysis, the following conditional mitigation measures may be required. • Subsequent Operational Air Quality Analysis. Prior to approval by the zoning administrator, a project-level air quality analysis shall be performed in conformance with the 2040 General Plan Actions 2 -A-4(b) and (c). The analysis shall include, but not be limited to, quantification of operational criteria air pollutant emissions, a determination of operational air quality impacts, and identification of mitigation measures necessary to reduce any significant impacts. • Health Risk Assessment. Prior to approval by the Zoning Administrator, a health risk assessment shall be performed in conformance with 2040 General Plan Action 2-A-4.c.

BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
• Project Coverage under ECC HCP/NCCP . Each applicant will be required to obtain coverage for the project under the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP. All applicable fees shall be paid, and/or an “in-lieu-of-fee” agreement fully executed, prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the project. • Worker Awareness Training for Biological Resources. Each applicant will be required to provide Worker Environmental Awareness training to all construction personnel. • Adherence to ECC HCP/NCCP Requirements. Each applicant shall ensure that the project adheres to all applicable East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP requirements. Including the following:
o Preconstruction surveys shall be conducted for the following species:
▪ Golden Eagle
▪ Burrowing Owl
▪ Swainson’s Hawk
▪ San Joaquin kit fox
If preconstruction surveys determine that any of the above species is present, the biologist may recommend construction monitoring . If so, the project applicant shall include submittal of a Construction Monitoring Plan (CMP) to the East Contra Costa HCP for approval.
366

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 35

o A delineation of jurisdictional wetlands and other waters shall be conducted on the project site per HCP Sections 6.2.1 and 6.3.1.
• Rare Plant Survey & Protection. An updated protocol-level rare plant survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist/botanist prior to construction. If any species covered by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP is found to be present, the project applicant shall notify the East Contra Costa County Habitat to salvage the occurrence(s) in accordance with HCP/NCCP Conservation Measure

3.10. If any special-status plant not covered by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP is found to be present, the occurrence(s) shall be avoided and protected in place to the extent feasible. If the occurrence(s) cannot be entirely avoided, then a Plant Salvage and Mi tigation Plan shall be prepared and implemented.
• Special-Status Bumble Bee Surveys & Protection. No more than one year prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and grading in the project area, a qualified biologist shall conduct surveys for Crotch bumble bee, obscure bumble bee, and American bumble bee. • Monarch Butterfly Protection. No more than two days prior to initiation of vegetation trimming or removal for construction, a qualified biologist shall survey all areas of potentially suitable habitat for monarch butterfly larval host plants.
• Western Pond Turtle Protection. Prior to the start of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a pedestrian preconstruction survey of the study area and adjacent suitable habitat for western pond turtle.
• Nesting Bird Protection (General). If project-related disturbance commences and time during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species, a preconstruction survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist within two weeks prior to initiation of work. • Nesting Bird Protection (Bald Eagle). Two weeks p rior to the initiation of work at the sit e, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for nesting Bald Eagles. • Special-Status Bat Survey & Protection. Prior to the initiation of any activity that could disturb roosting bats, a qualified biologist shall conduct a habitat evaluation for special -status bats, focusing on the needs of pallid bat, western red bat, and hoary bat. Furthermore, before any activities with the potential to disturb roosting bats begin, the approved biologist(s) shall conduct focused surveys for roost occupancy.
• San Joaquin Pocket Mouse Protection. Vegetation removal, clearing/grubbing, and grading activities shall be conducted in a uniform direction to allow mobile animals such as San Joaquin pocket mouse the ability to escape the disturbance area into adjacent undisturbed habitat. • American Badger Survey & Protection. Four weeks prior to the state of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for American badger den sites. 367

36 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

CULTURAL RESOURCES
• Contractor Awareness Training. Prior to construction, all workers shall receive cultural resource awareness training regarding sensitive cultural resources and tribal cultural resources, including applicable regulations, protocols for avoidance, and consequences of violating state laws and regulations.
• Archaeological Monitoring. All ground-disturbing activities associated with the Project within 200 feet of the unnamed creek shall be monitored by a qualified professional archaeologist. • Unanticipated Discoveries. If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction, all work must halt within a 100 -foot radius of the discovery. A qualified professional archaeologist shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find and shall have the authority to modify the no -work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment.

GEOLOGY AND SOILS
• Paleontological Resources Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. At the time of application for site- specific development, a qualified Paleontologist shall develop a Paleontological Resources Mitigation and Monitoring Plan that outlines preconstruction coordination, monitoring procedures, and emergency discovery procedures.
• Worker’s Environmental Awareness Training. Prior to the start of construction, a qualified paleontological monitor shall provide all construction personnel an environmental awareness training.
• Paleontological Monitoring. Prior to construction, the Project Paleontologist shall review excavation plans to determine where paleontologically sensitive areas will be disturbed by Project-related earth movement. Earthmoving construction activities will be monitored by a qualified p aleontological monitor in those areas and/or where disturbance will take place to previously undisturbed sediment.

NOISE
• Construction Mitigation Plan. If at the time of development review, an applicant cannot provide evidence of project level conformance with Table 3 -1, the applicant shall submit a detailed construction mitigation plan accompanied by a construction noise analysis that incorporates specific mitigation techniques for site-specific noise reduction and attenuation. • Operational Noise Mitigation Plan. If at the time of development review, an applicant cannot provide evidence of project level conformance with Table 3.10 -8, the applicant shall submit a detailed operational mitigation plan accompanied by an operational noise analysis that incorporates specific mitigation techniques for site-specific noise reduction and attenuation. • Subsequent Noise Analysis. If future development anticipates greater use of truck trips beyond what was analyzed in the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Programmatic Environmental Impact Report ( PEIR) (15 trips per day), then the applicant shall prepare a subsequent noise analysis to provide evidence that they conform to the noise level thresholds identified in Table

3.10-8. If the applicant cannot demonstrate conformance with Table 3.10 -8, then the applicant 368

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 37

shall submit a detailed operational mitigation plan accompanied by an operational noise analysis that incorporates specific mitigation techniques for site-specific noise reduction and attenuation.

TRANSPORTATION
• Transportation Demand Management Plan(s) . Travel Demand Management Plan(s) shall be prepared and implemented for future phases of proposed Specific Plan implementation. The TDM Plan shall comply with the City’s TIA Guidelines in effect at the time of application and identify trip reduction strategies as well as mechanisms for funding and overseeing the delivery of trip reduction programs and strategies.
• Perform Transportation Impact Analysis. As future specific land -uses are proposed for development within the Plan Area , a transportation impact analysis shall be performed in accordance with the City of Pittsburg’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. • Local and Regional Traffic Impact Fees. As future specific land -uses are developed on the site, appropriate local and regional traffic impact fees shall be calculated and paid in accordance with the anticipated level of traffic generation.

WILDFIRE
• Post-Fire Slope Instability Review. Prior to approval of building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that debris flow potential has been studied for post-fire conditions. Alternatives for mitigating potential debris flow impacts shall be considered and refined as each phase of future development is designed.

369

38 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

CHAPTER 9: ADMINISTRATION

9.1 OVERVIEW
California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 et seq.) grants authority to cities to utilize Specific Plans for purposes of implementing the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan.

The provisions, guidelines, and regulations contained within this Specific Plan provide the standards for land uses and development within the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan . The Specific Plan supersedes the development standards and regulations of the PMC unless stated otherwise in this document. Whenever the provisions and development standards of the Specific Plan conflict with those of the PMC, the Specific Plan shall take precedence. Where the Specific Plan is silent, the PMC shall apply.

9.2 RESPONSIBILITY
The City (party responsible) shall be responsible for administering the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan in accordance with the provisions of this Specific Plan document, all governing and applicable state and federal laws, the City of Pittsburg’s 2040 General Plan, and PMC.

The City (party responsible) shall enforce the provisions of the Specific Plan in the same manner that it enforces the provisions of the 2040 General Plan and PMC. Whenever in this Specific Plan any act is prohibited or is made or declared to be unlawful, or the doing of any acts required, or the failure to do any act is determined to be unlawful, the City of Pittsburg retains its authority under the PMC to enforce such violation or offense.

9.3 SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection sentence, clause, or phrase of this Specific Plan or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed separate, distinct, and independent, and shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Specific Plan or applications thereof, which can be implemented without the invalid provision or application.

9.4 INTERPRETATION
If an issue, condition, or situation occurs that is not sufficiently covered or provided for in this Specific Plan, those that are applicable for the most similar issue, condition, or situation shall be used. Unless otherwise provided, any ambiguity concer ning the content or application of the Specific Plan shall be resolved by the Director of Community and Economic Development in a manner consistent with the goals, policies, objectives, and intent established in the Specific Plan.

9.5 ADOPTION
The Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan has been prepared, submitted, and approved in a manner consistent with California Government Code Section 65451(a). The Specific Plan shall be adopted by 370

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan 39

ordinance and shall serve as the primary planning document for development within the Plan Area. The approved Specific Plan Area boundaries will be designated on the City’s Zoning Map. The land use and development standards identified in this Specific Plan supersede all zoning regulations to the extent that they would be in conflict with the sections of this Specific Plan.

Notwithstanding the interpretive rules set forth above, any use authorized by this Specific Plan shall be deemed to be conforming to other land use regulations of the PMC existing at the time of the adoption of this Specific Plan or as the same may be amended from time -to-time and shall not otherwise require any additional discretionary land use approvals beyond the requirements of this Specific Plan.

371

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-1

APPENDIX A: PITTSBURG 2040 GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
California Government Code (Title 7, Division 1, Section 3, Article 8, Section 65440 - 65457) permits the adoption and administration of Specific Plans as an implementation tool for elements contained within a jurisdiction’s local General Plan. Approval of the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan is based on the finding that the regulations, guidelines, and programs contained within this Specific Plan are consistent with the 2040 General Plan.

The Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan is consistent with the following applicable goals and policies of the 2040 General Plan.

LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal 2-1: Promote optimal, orderly, well -planned, and diverse land uses, including a compact urban form within the City’s projected municipal boundary that provides a mix and distribution of uses to meet Pittsburg’s needs, including mixed -use development, infill development , and reuse and revitalization of underutilized and brownfield sites.

Policies
2-P-1.2: Promote land use compatibility through development standards, use restrictions, environmental review, and design considerations.

The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the land use designation identified by the 2040 General Plan. The proposed Specific Plan proposes land use, development standards, environmental review, and design considerations that would implement the General Plan and promote compatible land use.
2-P-1.5: Discourage development at urban densities or intensities in areas on the periphery of the City boundary.

The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the 2040 General Plan Employment Center Industrial land use. The proposed project would place these uses on an under -utilized site within close proximity to housing, infrastructure and transit.

Goal 2-4: Promote business development in a range of sectors that contribute to the local and regional economy, provide high-wage and skilled jobs for Pittsburg residents.

Policies
2-P-4.1: Identify and allocate adequate lands in strategic locations throughout Pittsburg to accommodate and encourage employment growth, focusing on sectors that provide high-paid and high-quality jobs and continue to promote business development sites through Think Pittsburg and other local programs.

The Plan Area is identified in the 2040 General Plan as a strategic site for economic development within the West Leland Subarea to encourage employment growth in the area. 372

A-2 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

2-P-4.2: Encourage the development and intensification of employment centers, including high quality, professional office campuses, business parks, and industrial parks, along with innovation districts, related mixed-use development and open spaces. The centers sh all be located in areas fully served by public facilities and services, located along major arterials with easy freeway access and with access from public transit, and accessible to bicyclists and pedestrians.

Development under the proposed Specific Plan would generate economic employment in various industries, specifically in emerging sectors including technology and innovation. The Plan Area is currently served by utilities and would require extensions of the existing public w ater main line along the extension of Golf Club Road. The Plan Area is served by regional access from State Route 4 and local access from West Leland Road and Golf Club Road. Transit services are provided in the vicinity of the Plan Area, including bus and fixed rail transit. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the vicinity of the Plan Area include Class II bicycle facilities, sidewalks, crosswalks, pedestrian signals, and multi-use trails.
2-P-4.3: Promote large-scale office/business development, and reserve sites for Business Commercial uses in designated locations accessible from regional transportation systems.

The proposed Specific Plan would guide economic generating uses to support business development in the Plan Area consistent with the 2040 General Plan ECI designation. The ECI permitted uses include offices and could be proposed as a future development pro ject. The Plan Area is accessible by the regional transportation system. The Pittsburg -Bay Point BART Transfer Substation is the closest rail station to the Plan Area approximately 1.3 miles away. Bus Routes 388 and 390 operate along West Leland Road.
2-P-4.5: Support office, business, and industrial land uses that will improve the City’s employment base through high-quality, well-paid jobs that attract the technology, energy, and industrial sectors desired by the community.

Allowed uses within the proposed Specific Plan would generate employment in emerging sectors, including technology, energy, and industrial sectors, which would generate economic opportunity within the city.
2-P-4.6: Encourage the development of “clean” industries, such as research and development, technology and specialized manufacturing, and similar uses that limit environmental impacts and health risks commonly associated with industrial uses.

Allowed uses within the proposed Specific Plan include research and development, technology and innovation including data centers, energy, focusing on clean-tech uses. 2-P-4.7: Encourage employee -intensive uses such as medical and professional offices, light industry, research, and skill training.

Allowed uses within the proposed Specific Plan include research and development, technology and innovation including data centers, energy, focusing on clean-tech uses. 373

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-3

2-P-4.10: Ensure that employment-generating development, such as industrial, warehouse, distribution, logistics, and fulfillment projects, does not result in adverse impacts (including health risks and nuisances), particularly to residential uses and other sensitive receptors, including impacts related to the location and scale of buildings, lighting, noise, smell, and other environmental and environmental justice considerations. When development is incompatible, require adequate buffers and/or architectura l consideration to protect residential areas, developed or undeveloped, from intrusion of nonresidential activities that may degrade the quality of life in such residential areas.

Goal 3 of the proposed Specific Plan aims to incorporate development into the existing landscape while minimizing impacts to the environment and sensitive receptors. The Proposed project would employ buffers between the Plan Area and residential districts. For more information on how future development would ensure no adverse impacts to the environment or communities, please refer to Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, 3.2, Air Quality, and 3.10, Noise.

GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policies
3-P-1.2: Manage the City’s growth to balance development of housing options and job opportunities, protection of open space and habit areas, construction of transportation improvements, and preservation of high quality high-quality public facilities.

The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the 2040 General Plan land use patterns, as it would provide job opportunities proximal to housing while preserving hillside open space, sensitive habitats, such as drainages (outside of building envelopes), and necessary transportation infrastructure to support the proposed project.
3-P-1.3: Provide a range of development intensities, with the highest intensities in Downtown and in areas proximate to transit and services, and lower intensities in hillside and at the City’s southern edge, with an emphasis on land use patterns that make efficie nt use of the local and regional transportation systems and consider conservation of natural resources.

The proposed Specific Plan would support land use patterns by providing job opportunities close to housing while at the same time preserving hillside open space, sensitive habitats, such as drainages (outside of building envelopes). Future development within the Plan Area would support transportation infrastructure and maintain connectivity from the Plan Area to the City and regional circulation systems.
374

A-4 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT
Policies
4-P-1.2: Encourage and support high-quality design that evokes Pittsburg’s history and unique character through ensuring standards and guidelines for residential, commercial, industrial, mixed use, civic, and other uses incorporate features and materials design that reinforces Pittsburg’s community character.

Future development would be required to adhere to design standards identified in the proposed Specific Plan, which are intended to ensure buildings would blend with the character of the existing environment. See Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, of the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) for more detail. 4-P-1.4: Seek methods to improve the visual character and design of Pittsburg, including establishing design standards for gateways, key corridors, residential uses, and non-residential uses, promoting high- quality redevelopment and reuse projects, and addressing features that may adversely affect views of gateways, ridgelines, open space, and other identified visual resources.

Future development would be required to adhere to design standards in the proposed Specific Plan, which are intended to ensure buildings would blend with the character of the Plan Area.

Landscaping throughout the Plan Area would soften the appearance of bu ildings and blend with the natural environment. Landscape design would be used as buffering between open areas and roadways. See Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, of this PEIR for more detail. 4-P-2.10: Use revegetation as an erosion control measure to maintain the natural character of a hillside; utilize hydro -seed, silt traps, and other engineering solutions where erosion potential exists during development.

Landscaping would be used as storm water management best practices to reduce stormwater related erosion. Landscape design standards also require ground cover to reach 100 percent within one year. See Section 3.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, for more detail.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
Goal 6 -1: Ensure that the City’s General Plan sustains and promotes a vibrant, fiscally sustainable economy that fosters strong economic growth, a stable revenue base, availability of local goods and services to meet the City’s, high quality employment opportunities, and quality of life for all residents.

Policies
6-P-1.2: Pursue strategies that support the attraction and retention of diverse industries, a diverse workforce, and a diversity of municipal revenue sources.

The proposed Specific Plan would generate a diverse workforce in emerging sectors, including technology, energy, and industrial sectors, within the city. 375

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-5

6-P-1.3: Achieve and maintain a balance of land uses within the City that assures residential development is complemented by expanded local employment opportunities, retail and commercial services, and recreation and entertainment venues; and that the City-wide mix of land uses provides a balanced variety of housing and business types and balances uses that produce revenues and those that require public expenditures.

The proposed Specific Plan would guide development for a n employment center on a vacant portion of the former municipal Delta View Golf Course. Development of the Plan Area would allow for the City to achieve and maintain a greater balance of land uses within the City. 6-P-1.4: Ensure that the City’s revenue and fiscal base is not overly dependent on any one type of land use, development, or revenue source.

Development of the Plan Area would create a new source of revenue within the City, which would further diversify the City’s revenue sources.

Goal 6-2: Facilitate attraction, retention, and expansion of businesses that meet the City’s economic development objectives and maintain a desirable climate for conducting business in and with the City.

Policies
6-P-2.1: Promote attraction and retention of businesses that provide a diversified economic industry base with a broad range of job types and skills that insulate the local economy from possible economic downturns.

Development of the Plan Area would generate a diverse workforce in emerging sectors, including technology, energy, and industrial sectors, within the City. 6-P-2.9: Encourage new development in areas where growth and investment have the potential to catalyze revitalization of existing uses.

Allowed uses within the proposed Specific Plan would facilitate economic development and employment in an area that is surrounded by supportive uses including residential and community commercial. The proposed Specific Plan would re -purpose and revitalize the former golf course, which has been closed for over six years.
6-P-2.11: Provide appropriate incentives for infill and redevelopment projects that have the potential to revitalize existing neighborhoods or commercial areas.

The proposed Specific Plan would redevelop the former municipal Delta View Golf Course, which is currently closed and vacant, providing increased opportunity to revitalize the surrounding area. 6-P-2.14: Encourage new businesses and project development under the Employment Center Industrial land use classification.

The proposed Specific Plan would permit land uses under the Employment Center Industrial land use classification, generating new business opportunities and future development. 376

A-6 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

Goal 6 -3: Promote Pittsburg as a forward -thinking community that is innovative and adaptive to changing economic forces.

Policies
6-P-3.4: Attract and retain a variety of economic sectors that capitalize on Pittsburg’s competitive advantages and strengths, in order to promote a diversity of businesses, significant sales tax generation, and provide residents with skilled, high-paying employment opportunities.

Development of the Plan Area would generate a diverse workforce in emerging sectors, including technology, energy, and industrial sectors, within the City.

Goal 6-4: Encourage a broad range of employment opportunities and expand educational and training opportunities to support residents finding high-quality, well-paid employment within the community.

Policies
6-P-4.1: Increase job opportunities available in Pittsburg, so that residents may choose to work locally instead of commuting.

The proposed Specific Plan would provide new job opportunities in emerging sectors close to housing.
6-P-4.2: Attract and retain a broad base of businesses and industries to provide a variety of skilled jobs allowing career growth potential, while focusing on high-wage and/or high-sales tax producers.

Development of the Plan Area would generate a diverse workforce in emerging sectors, including technology, energy, and industrial sectors, within the City.

CIRCULATION & TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policies
7-P-1.1: Ensure that the City’s circulation network is a well-connected system of streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, trails, and paths that effectively and safely accommodate all users in a manner that considers the context of surrounding land uses, the needs of all roadway users, and is maintained and improved over time to support buildout of the General Plan.

The proposed Specific Plan would provide connections from the Plan Area to the City’s existing circulation network via Golf Club Drive. Future development would be required to pay Transportation Impact Mitigation Fees (TIMF) to pay its fair share for a wel l-connected system, per mitigation measure (MM) 3.13-3.
377

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-7

7-P-1.5: Implement and continue to increase efforts to reduce regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by supporting land use patterns and site designs that promote active modes of transportation, and public transit.

The proposed Specific Plan includes standards that encourage pedestrian circulation through an integrated sidewalk network with access points at Golf Club Road. Future development would adhere to CalGreen code which includes standards for bike and pedestrian facilities. Furthermore, MM 3.13-1 would require future development to create and implement a TDM Plan to encourage a reduction in regional VMT.
7-P-1.6: Design streets to operate with vehicle speeds that are safer for all users, especially pedestrians and bicyclists, while providing adequate access for emergency vehicles. Speed reductions strategies should include reduced lane widths and application of tra ffic calming measures on local and collector streets and especially near parks, schools, trails, and in the Downtown core.

The proposed Specific Plan would extend Golf Club Road, which is intended to provide private access to the Plan Area. Additionally, three emergency vehicle access roadways would provide access to the Plan Area. These roadways are private and only used when necessary, by emergency responders. Therefore, constructing these roadways to City standards to include traffic calming and speed-reduction features would not be required.
7-P-1.7: Strive to maintain delay-based level of service (LOS) D for motor vehicle traffic as the minimum acceptable service standard for all signalized and stop -controlled intersections at all times (including during peak periods) unless maintenance of LOS D would, in the C ity’s judgement, be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement if other City goals identified in this General Plan. Congestion in excess of LOS D may be acceptable in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traffic flow and/or promote multimodal or non -vehicular transportation as part of a development project or City -initiated project. In the designated Downtown core, as defined by the City’s General Plan and illustrated by the City’s Subdivision map, LOS E would be considered as an a cceptable service standard to account for the more urban, pedestrian-oriented character of the area.

Future development would be required to perform a Traffic Impact Analysis in accordance with the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Any violations of the guidance shall result in improvement measures developed to eliminate those violations, per MM 3.13-2. 7-P-1.9: Implement transportation improvements to maintain and enhance roadway operations and safety while striving to improve accessibility and comfort for all users.

As previously described, future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to pay all applicable TIMFs to support future transportation improvements within the City, per MM 3.13-3.
378

A-8 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

Goal 7-2: Coordinate with regional transportation agencies and developers to promote connectivity, manage commuter traffic, and promote the use of alternatives to single-occupant vehicle trips.

Policies
7-P-2.2: Encourage employers to provide programs for carpooling/transit/biking/walking subsidies, bicycle facilities, alternative work schedules, ridesharing, telecommuting, working at home, employee education, and preferential parking for carpools/vanpools.

Future Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plans shall be prepared and implemented for future development, per MM 3.13-1. TDM plans shall comply with the City’s TIA Guidelines in effect at the time of application and identify trip reduction strategies and the mechanisms for funding and monitoring of such programs and strategies. These strategies may include but are not limited to car-sharing programs and alternate work schedules.
7-P-2.4: Ensure that safe and continuous routes for pedestrians and bicyclists are provided within new development projects and on any roadways that are impacted as a result of new development.

The proposed Specific Plan would extend Golf Club Road, which is intended to provide private access to the Plan Area. Therefore, constructing these roadways to City standards to include safe and continuous routes for pedestrians and bicyclists would not be required.

Goal 7 -3: Proactively support and encourage travel by non -automobile modes by maintaining and expanding safe and efficient pedestrian, bicycle and transit networks.

Policies
7-P-3.3: Require that all new roadways and developments accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians.

The proposed Specific Plan includes pedestrian paths from Golf Club Road that extend to the Plan Area. The proposed Specific Plan includes standards for fixed bike facilities, and future TDM Plans would provide necessary bicyclist and pedestrian facilities necessary for trip reduction strategies, per MM 3.13-1.
7-P-3.4: Ensure continued compliance with Title 24 of the California Building Code, requiring the removal of all barriers to disabled persons on City streets, and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to allow mobility-impaired users such as the disabled and elderly to safely and effectively use the City’s circulation network.

All future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to comply with the current California Building Code.
7-P-3.5: Encourage secure bicycle facilities and other alternative transportation facilities to be provided as part of new developments, especially future employment sites, public facilities, and multi -family residential complexes.

Future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to comply with the current California Building Code at the time of application, including the “CalGreen” code 379

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-9

for electric vehicle parking standards. In addition, bike facilities would be required and determined based on a ratio to the number of parking required. Furthermore, per MM 3.13-1, TDM Plans shall identify additional details on bicycle facility improvements for each subsequent phase of development.
7-P-4.2: Use the adopted regional and local Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee (TIMF) ordinances to ensure that all new developments pay a fair share of the cost of transportation improvements or require mitigation for development proposals that are not part of the TIMF program, which contribute more than one percent of the volume to an existing roadway or intersections.

Future development would be required to pay TIMFs to contribute to the necessary capital for improvement projects for a well-connected system, per MM 3.13-3.

COMMUNITY HEALTH & ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT
Policies
8-P-1.4: Consider the effects of planning decisions on the overall health and well-being of the community and its residents and specifically upon disadvantaged communities and vulnerable populations, such as areas with concentrated populations of seniors, persons with a disability, and low income residents.

Future development within the Plan Area would be required to adhere to best management practices established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) to reduce pollution exposure to sensitive receptors. Furthermore, air quality MM 3.2-1 through 3.2-3 would be implemented as applicable, to ensure air quality thresholds are not exceeded. Development projects accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan shall not be approved until it can be demonstrated that the proposed project would not result in an exceedance of the thresholds as advised by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment and Bay Area Air Quality Management District for public health risks at nearby sensitive receptors. Additionally, future development accommodated by the p roposed Specific Plan would be required to reduce noise levels to acceptable thresholds during construction and operations. If noise levels are anticipated to be above acceptable thresholds, MM 3.10-1 through 3.10-3 would be implemented. See Sections 3.2, Air Quality and 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR for more detail. 8-P-1.6: Consider the effects on sensitive populations when siting industrial and other intensive uses, designating Citywide truck routes, and considering uses and projects that may have adverse impacts on disadvantaged and vulnerable communities.

Development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would incorporate best management practices that would consider certain tools, methods, and approaches in reducing pollution, particularly diesel particulate matter, on disadvantaged and vulnerable com munities. Air quality MM 3.2-1 through 3.2-3 would be implemented as applicable to ensure air quality thresholds are not exceeded. Similarly, noise MM 3.10-1 through 3.10-3 would be implemented as applicable to ensure noise thresholds are not exceeded. Refer to Sections 3.2, Air Quality and 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR for more detail.
380

A-10 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

8-P-1.12: Identify and assess disproportionate impacts of environmental pollution and work to remedy these impacts.

Future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to conduct a project -level air quality analysis to determine potential construction air quality impacts.

Identification of mitigation measures necessary to reduce any significa nt impacts shall be developed in coordination with the BAAQMD (MM 3.2-1). See Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the PEIR for more detail.

Similarly, future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to reduce noise levels to acceptable thresholds. If noise levels are anticipated to be above acceptable thresholds, MM 3.10-1 through 3.10-3 would be implemented. Refer to Section 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR for further discussion.
8-P-2.2: Require future planning decisions, development, and infrastructure and public projects to consider the effects on the overall health and well-being of the community and its residents, with specific consideration provided to ensure disadvantaged communitie s have equitable access to services and amenities and to reduce exposure to hazardous materials, industrial activity, vehicle exhaust, other sources of pollution, and excessive noise on residents, with an emphasis on reducing exposure of any disadvantaged communities to such exposure.

Subsequent development within the Plan Area would be required to incorporate best management practices that would minimize pollution exposure, particularly diesel particulate matter, on nearby sensitive receptors (see MM 3.2-1 through 3.2-3). Furthermore, if future development cannot adhere to the applicable noise level thresholds, a construction and/or operation noise mitigation plan shall be submitted prior to development (see MM 3.10-1 through 3.10-3). Refer to Sections

3.2, Air Quality and 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR for more detail.

RECREATION & YOUTH ELEMENT
Policies
9-P-1.5: Maintain park and recreation facility standards for new development to serve both residents and employees, attainable through, in order of priority: 1) provision of fully developed parks, 2) dedication of parkland, or 3) payment of in-lieu fees dedicated to the provision of new park sites or enhancing existing facilities.

Future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to pay development impact fees that would contribute to the maintenance of park and recreation facilities throughout the City. Refer to Section 3.12, Public Services and Recreation, of the PEIR for more detail.
381

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-11

9-P-2.2: Development projects adjacent to open space, shoreline, hillside, and other recreational areas shall provide public connections and linkages.

Development within the Plan Area would not preclude future connections by the City or other agencies to adjacent open space or recreational areas, including the potential future bikeway along the Contra Costa Canal, as identified in the 2040 General Plan. 10-P-1.7: Provide, and encourage access to, public and private open space within urbanized parts of Pittsburg, in order to provide for the recreational and public health needs of residents and provide visual contrast with the built environment.

See response to Policy 9-P-2.2 above.
10-P-1.8: Require development projects to maximize the potential for open space, visual experiences, and passive and active recreation.

As described above, development in the Plan Area would not preclude future connections by the City or other agencies to development of the future Contra Costa Canal bikeway connection, as described in the 2040 General Plan. Future development of this bikeway could maximize the potential for open space and active recreation by lin king the Plan Area to adjacent recreational facilities such as the John Henry Park and Stoneman Trail. Additionally, proposed Specific Plan guidelines incorporate landscape materials for visual interest and blending the natural and built environment within the Plan Area.

RESOURCE CONSERVATION & OPEN SPACE
Policies
10-P-1.8: Require development projects to maximize the potential for open space, visual experiences, and passive and active recreation.

Future development would be required to adhere to urban design and resource conservation & open space policies that encourages the preservation of ridgeline views, as described further in Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, of the PEIR. 10-P-2.5: Conserve natural terrain, native vegetation, and sensitive habitats and recognize the role of native vegetation, natural terrain and green infrastructure in natural resource and watershed management.

Siting of future development would be encouraged to be placed in areas that are feasible for ground stability and erosion control. Hillside placement would be avoided, and the natural terrain would be preserved. Additionally, landscape design standards in the proposed Specific Plan would ensure a blend of the natural environment by utilizing native vegetation as landscape materials.

Furthermore, native vegetation would serve as stormwater best management practices, contributing to the reduction in stormwater pollution on watersheds. 382

A-12 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

10-P-2.8: Require new development projects and expansion of existing uses to conserve sensitive habitat, including special status species.

Future development projects would be required to adhere to the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP requirements. This includes preconstruction surveys for Golden Eagle, Burrowing Owl, Swainson’s Hawk, and San Joaquin kit fox, per MM 3.3-3. Additionally, future development would be required to conduct preconstruction surveys by a qualified entomologist for several special -status species including candidate bumble bee, monarch butterfly, western pond turtle, candidate nesting birds, bald eagle , candidate bats, San Joa quin pocket mouse, and American badger, per MM 3.3-5 through 3.3-12, respectively.
10-P-2.11: Encourage the preservation of wildlife corridors to ensure the integrity of habitat linkages.

It is anticipated for future development within the Plan Area to keep the eastern portion of the Contra Costa Canal crossing intact, which would allow continued wildlife connectivity.

Furthermore, it is anticipated that the extension of Golf Club Road would be constructed to avoid the stream that runs along the eastern edge of the Plan Area. Avoiding impacts to the stream would allow for continued use by wildlife species. Additionally, the PG&E transmission line corridor would continue to provide a wildlife connectivity corridor. To further ensure future development would not have a significant impact to wildlife connectivity, MM 3.3-1 through 3.3-3 would be required.
10-P-2.14: Collaborate with developers to maintain, and where feasible establish enhancements to creeks, marshes, wetlands, and riparian corridors in the design of new development.

The proposed Specific Plan establishes envelopes for future development, which preserve stream corridors and riparian habitat within the Plan Area.
10-P-2.15: Protect and restore threatened natural resources, such as wildlife, estuaries, tidal zones, marine life, wetlands, and waterfowl habitat.

As described in response to Policy 10-P-2.8 above, future development would protect and restore biological resources by complying with the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP requirements. Refer to Section 3.4, Biological Resources, of the PEIR for more detail. 10-P-2.16: Limit dredging and filling of wetlands and marshlands, particularly adjacent to Browns Islands Preserve.

Future development would be encouraged to preserve existing wetlands in the Plan Area as described in response to Policy 10 -P-2.14 above. Any dredging or filling of wetlands required by development would be required to adhere to the East Contra Costa HCP/N CCP requirements details in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, of the PEIR for more detail. 383

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-13

10-P-2.18: Recognize that climate change impacts may influence future guidance, and best available data, and continue to ensure that up -to-date information is consulted when reviewing projects for potential impacts to biological resources, including the Bay, Delta, and sensitive habitats.

During the development review process, applicants would be required to provide supportive documents for project approval that indicate biological conformance, such as proof of East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP fee payment and copies of regulatory resource agency permits. 10-P-3.1: Require development to use best management practices (BMPs) to minimize the runoff and erosion caused by earth movement.

As described in Section 3.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the PEIR, future development project applicants must develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that includes BMPs to minimize runoff and erosion.
10-P-3.2: Encourage preservation of natural creeks and riparian habitat as best as possible.

See response to Policy 10-P-2.14 above.
10-P-4.4: Address soil and groundwater pollution during development, redevelopment, and reuse projects.

As discussed in Section 3.8 of the PEIR, impacts to groundwater recharge and stormwater drainage would be evaluated at the project -level in association with subsequent development projects. As future development and infrastructure projects are considered, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the General Plan, PMC, and other applicable regulations. 10-P-4.5: Reduce sedimentation and erosion of waterways by minimizing site disturbance and vegetation removal.

As described in Section 3.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the PEIR, future development project applicants must develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that includes BMPs to minimize sedimentation and erosion of waterways. 10-P-4.8: Protect water quality by reducing non -point sources of pollution and the dumping of debris in and near creeks, storm drains, and Contra Costa Canal. All drainage from new development should either be directed to an appropriate storm drain system that avoids CCWD facilities and Contra Costa Canal right- of-way, or obtain an encroachment permit from CCWD consistent with Action 10-A-2.h.

As future development and infrastructure projects are considered, each project will be evaluated for conformance with the General Plan, PMC, and other applicable regulations. Implementation of BMPs identified in the approved SWPPP will further protect water quality. 10-P-5.5: Require new development to avoid obstructing views of, and to minimize impacts to, significant visual resources through the following: creative site planning; integration of natural features into the project; appropriate scale, materials, and design to co mplement the surrounding natural landscape; 384

A-14 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

clustering of development to preserve open space vistas and natural features; minimal disturbance of topography; and creation of contiguous open space networks.

New development would be required to adhere to the 2040 General Plan policy that supports high quality design to protect visual resources and proposed Specific Plan design guidelines regarding building form, materials, landscaping, and screening. Refer to Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, of the PEIR for more detail.
10-P-5.6: Ensure that the visibility of new development from natural features and open space areas is minimized to preserve the landforms and ridgelines that provide a natural backdrop to the open space systems.

Future development would be required to adhere to urban design and resource conservation & open space policies that encourages the preservation of ridgeline views, as described further in Section 3.1, Aesthetics and Visual Resources, of the PEIR. 10-P-6.1: Support the principles of reducing air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions through comprehensive and sustainable land use, transportation, and energy planning and addressing opportunities to decrease emissions associated with local government operations.

Future development is consistent with the City’s Sustainability Plan, as described in Section 3.2, and 3.6 of the PEIR. In addition, TDM Plans would be required for future development, as described further in Section 3.13, Transportation and Circulation, of the PEIR. 10-P-6.2: Ensure that new development is consistent with the energy objectives and targets identified by the City’s Sustainability Plan.

Future development would adhere to the objectives and targets identified by the City’s Sustainability Plan, as described in 3.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy, of the PEIR. 10-P-6.4: Encourage and support infill, mixed use, and higher density development, where appropriate, in order to reduce GHG emissions associated with vehicle travel.

The proposed Specific Plan proposes employment generating uses on an infill site in close proximity to housing and transit.
10-P-6.6: Reduce the generation of TACs such as ozone, carbon monoxide, lead, and particulate matter to work toward improving air quality and meeting all Federal and State ambient air quality standards.

Subsequent development in the Plan Area would be required to adhere to 2040 General Plan policies that limit or avoid the exposure of toxic contaminants, odors, and dust on receptors, with guidance from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. These policies are further described in Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the PEIR.
385

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-15

10-P-6.7: Reduce the potential for human discomfort or illness due to local concentrations of toxic contaminants, odors, and dust.

Subsequent development in the Plan Area would be required to adhere to 2040 General Plan policies that limit or avoid the exposure of toxic contaminants, odors, and dust on receptors, with guidance from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. These policies are further described in Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the PEIR.
10-P-6.9: Coordinate and review at the time of submittal of land use planning applications and development project BMPs and standards to prevent odors and odor complaints Future development would adhere to all applicable standards for project approval, as directed by the City as further described in Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the PEIR. 10-P-6.10: Require and condition all new public and privately constructed buildings to exceed, where feasible, and comply with construction and design standards that promote energy conservation, including the most current “green” development standards in the California Green Building Standards Code.

Future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to comply with the current California Building Code at the time of application, including the “CalGreen” code for electric energy conservation, as further described in Section 3.6, Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change and Energy, of the PEIR.
10-P-6.11: Require expanded innovative and green building best practices, where feasible, including, but not limited to, LEED certification for all new development and retrofitting existing uses, and encourage public and private projects to exceed the most current “ green” development standards in the California Green Building Standards Code.

Future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to comply with the current California Building Code at the time of application, including the “CalGreen” code for electric energy conservation, as further described in Section 3.6, Greenhouse Gases, Climate Change and Energy, of the PEIR.
10-P-6.12: Require and condition construction and operation of new development to be managed to minimize fugitive dust and air pollutant emissions.

Future development would adhere to any air quality standards, including minimizing fugitive dust and air pollutant emissions standards during construction and operation, as further described in Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the PEIR.
10-P-6.13: Implement development standards, mitigation measures, and best practices that require energy conservation and the reduction in greenhouse gases, including:
• Require new development to incorporate energy-efficient features through passive design concepts (e.g., techniques for heating and cooling, building siting orientation, street and lot layout, landscape placement, and protection of solar access); 386

A-16 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

• Require construction standards which promote energy conservation including window placement, building eaves, and roof overhangs;
• Require all projects to meet or, when feasible, exceed the most current "green" development standards in the California Green Building Standards Code; • Require projects to implement applicable Sustainability Plan strategies and actions; • Encourage projects to incorporate enhanced energy conservation measures, electric -only appliances, and other methods of reducing energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions; and • Require large energy users to implement an energy conservation plan, which may include solar or other non -fossil fuel sources to meet the operation's full power demand and 100% fleet electrification, as part of the project review and approval process, and develop a program to monitor compliance with and effectiveness of that plan.

Future development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to comply with the current California Building Code at the time of application, including the “CalGreen” code for electric energy conservation, along with other energy conserva tion measures, as further described in Section 3.6, Greenhouse Gases Emissions and Energy, of the PEIR.

SAFETY ELEMENT
Policies
11-P-2.1: Consider climate change impacts and adaptive responses in long -term planning and current development decisions consistent with the policies and programs of the City’s Sustainability Plan and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Future development would be required to comply with the City’s current Sustainability Plan and Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. More detail on compliance with these plans can be found in Section

3.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy , and 3.7, Hazards and Hazardous Material s, of the PEIR.
11-P-3.4: Ensure that development projects mitigate impacts to the City’s storm drainage capacity from storm water runoff occurring from the property. Project applicants shall demonstrate that projects implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Low Impact Devel opment measures (LID) to treat stormwater before discharge from the site project and that project implementation would not result in increases in the peak flow runoff to adjacent lands or drainage facilities that would exceed the design capacity of the drainage facility or result in an increased potential for off-site flooding.

Future development within the Plan Area would be required to comply with City grading, erosion, and sediment control standards to reduce and treat stormwater runoff to adjacent lands or drainage facilities. Refer to Section 3.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the PEIR for more detail. 11-P-3.7: Ensure that new developments comply with all applicable requirements of Municipal Code Chapter 15.80 - Floodplain Management, the California Building Code as adopted by the City, and the latest promulgated FEMA standards for development in the flood hazard areas.

Future development within the Plan Area would be required to comply with all applicable PMC. 387

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-17

11-P-4.7: Ensure that Bay Area Air Quality Management District requirements are implemented in construction projects to reduce soil and particulate matter transport.

Future development within the Plan Area would be required to adhere to best management practices established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. See Section 3.2, Air Quality, of the PEIR for more detail.

COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policies
12-P-2.1: Continue water district and user conservation efforts to help reduce demand in light of drought patterns, groundwater management, raw water availability, and the potential for unforeseen shortfalls.

The use of recycled water for future development would be encouraged and considered at the project-level. Furthermore, the proposed Specific Plan outlines guidelines for using drought - tolerant plants.
12-P-2.2: Continue water conservation efforts from industrial facilities, including continued enforcement of the City’s water-efficient landscape standards and participation in a wastewater reclamation efforts.

See response to Policy 12-P-2.1 above.
12-P-3.4: Maintain environmentally appropriate wastewater management practices.

Wastewater treatment and conveyance facilities would be evaluated at the project -level in association with subsequent development projects. Future development projects would be subject to compliance review with building code standards of the PMC and other applicable regulations that pertain to wastewater utilities and building standards for plumbing design. 12-P-4.3: Reduce municipal waste generation by increasing recycling, on-site composting, and mulching, where feasible, at municipal facilities, as well as using resource efficient landscaping techniques in new or renovated medians and parks.

Future development projects would be required to comply with Assembly Bill 341, which requires businesses to arrange for recycling services, in order to reuse, recycle, compost or otherwise divert solid waste from disposal. For more detail, refer to Section 3.14, Utilities and Services Systems, of the PEIR. Furthermore, the proposed Specific Plan includes guidelines for efficient, drought - tolerant landscaping to be incorporated throughout the Plan Area. 12-P-6.3: Require development in areas of high fire hazard to be designed and constructed to minimize potential losses and maximize the ability of fire personnel to suppress fire incidents.

Future development would be required to adhere to PMC and proposed Specific Plan guidelines related to fire management. These requirements include ensuring adequate defensible space, brush management, landscape design standards, heat island reduction, and overall energy reduction methods to reduce fire risk. See Section 3.15, Wildfires, of the PEIR for more detail. 388

A-18 Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan

12-P-6.4: Require existing and new development in or adjacent to high and very high fire hazard severity zones, wildland urban interface zones, and State Responsibility Areas to maintain defensible space zones, landscape using native, fire-resistant plants and fire-resistant materials, abate weeds, and, where feasible, harden structures and infrastructure against fires.

See response to Policy 12-P-6.3 above.
12-P-7.4: Reduce the risk of localized and downstream flooding and runoff through the use best management practices to minimize runoff from the site to the storm drainage system, including:
• High infiltration measures, including the maximization of permeable landscape, • Using permeable surfaces for parking lots, sidewalks, and bike paths, • Where feasible, using roof runoff as irrigation.

Landscape design standards included in the proposed Specific Plan include buffering the Plan Area from open areas the roadway using landscaping.

NOISE ELEMENT
Policies
13-P-1.2: Require development projects, including new uses, to meet the noise standards.

Future development within the Plan Area would be required to adhere to performance standards (described in Section 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR) which would bring noise to acceptable noise levels.

During development review, applicants would be required to provide evidence that the proposed project can meet standards, and any exceedance would require site -specific construction and operational mitigation plans, per MM 3.10-1 and MM 3.10-2. 13-P-1.5: Continue efforts to incorporate noise considerations into land use planning decisions, including measures to control noise at the source through site design, building design, landscaping, hours of operation, and other techniques, for new development deeme d to be noise generators, and guide the location and design of transportation facilities to minimize the effects of noise on adjacent land uses.

Subsequent development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would be required to adhere to performance standards for operational generated noise. If during development review, it is determined that a project would exceed performance standards (descri bed in Section 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR), a site-specific operational mitigation plan would be required, MM 3.10-2. The plan would incorporate noise control techniques to the site-design such as proper site layout that would distance noise generating uses away from sensitive receptors as feasible. 13-P-1.7: Limit generation of loud noises on construction sites adjacent to existing development to normal business hours between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM.

Any subsequent development accommodated by the proposed Specific Plan would adhere to PMC, which limits construction noise of 65 dBA to daytime hours only. Furthermore, it is not anticipated that proposed project implementation would require nighttime construction activity. 389

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan A-19

13-P-1.8: Reduce the impact of truck traffic noise on residential areas by limiting such traffic to appropriate truck routes. Consider methods to restrict truck travel times in sensitive areas.

West Leland Road is a designated Route of Regional Significance and a City designated truck route.

Other designated truck routes in the Plan Area proximity include Railroad Avenue and Bailey Road.

Truck traffic would primarily use designated truck routes. In addition, as described in Section 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR, traffic modeling predicts noise impacts along West Leland Road would not increase by 5 dBA.
13-P-1.12: Require development projects to reduce adverse construction vibration impacts to sensitive receptors, as feasible, when vibration -related construction activities are to occur within 100 feet from existing sensitive receptors. Measures to reduce noise and vibration effect may include, but are not limited to:
• Phase demolition, earth-moving and ground-impacting operations so as not to occur in the same time period.
• The pre-existing condition of all buildings within a 100 -foot radius will be recorded in order to evaluate damage from construction activities. Fixtures and finishes within a 100 -foot radius of construction activities susceptible to damage will be document ed (photographically and in writing) prior to construction. All damage will be repaired back to its pre-existing condition. • Substituting vibration-generating equipment with equipment or procedures that would generate lower levels of vibration. For instance, in comparison to impact piles, drilled piles or the use of a sonic or vibratory pile driver are preferred alternatives where geological conditions would permit their use.
• Other specific measures as they are deemed appropriate by the implementing agency to maintain consistency with adopted policies and regulations regarding vibration.

Subsequent development within the Plan Area would be required to adhere to performance standards (described in Section 3.10, Noise, of the PEIR) which would bring construction related noise impacts to acceptable standards, per MM 3.10-1. During the time of application, applicants must show adherence to performance standards, which include significant source of vibration (impact pile driving, etc.) in relation to acceptable levels. Considering the closest noise -sensitive receptor is 800 feet away, a pile driver would not be a significant source of vibration even at 500 feet away, per Caltrans’ vibration thresholds.
390

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan B-1

APPENDIX B: LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE I ONLY)
391
SHADE TREES (24" BOX MINIMUM) 133
SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE

CEDRUS DEODARA / DEODAR CEDAR

FRAXINUS VELUTINA / VELVET ASH

PISTACIA CHINENSIS / CHINESE PISTACHE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA / COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS ILEX / HOLLY OAK
ACCENT TREES (24" BOX MINIMUM) 31
SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

ARBUTUS X 'MARINA' / MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE

CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS / WESTERN REDBUD

GINKGO BILOBA / MAIDENHAIR TREE
SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER 88,851 SF
SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

ARCTOSTAPHYLOS MANZANITA / COMMON MANZANITA 929
BACCHARIS PILULARIS / COYOTE BRUSH 3,716
CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' / LITTLE JOHN WEEPING BOTTLEBRUSH 2,585 FRANGULA CALIFORNICA / CALIFORNIA COFFEEBERRY 1,451
LOROPETALUM CHINENSE / CHINESE FRINGE FLOWER 2,577
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM / TRAILING MYOPORUM 3,708
OLEA EUROPAEA 'MONTRA' / LITTLE OLLIE® OLIVE 3,708
RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA / INDIAN HAWTHORN 3,708
SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS / AMERICAN ELDERBERRY 2,577
ACCENT PLANTINGS 21,988 SF
SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY 914
DIETES IRIDIOIDES / FORTNIGHT LILY 1,428
LANTANA MONTEVIDENSIS / PURPLE TRAILING LANTANA 635
ROSA CALIFORNICA / CALIFORNIA WILD ROSE 635
ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS / ROSEMARY 635
SCREENING 14,922 SF
SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

CEANOTHUS THYRSIFLORUS / BLUEBLOSSOM 69
HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA / TOYON 155
PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA / JAPANESE PITTOSPORUM 69
RHUS INTEGRIFOLIA / LEMONADE BERRY 155
STORMWATER TREATMENT BASIN SEED MIX 115,548 SF
SELECT PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM / COMMON YARROW

CAREX BARBARAE / SANTA BARBARA SEDGE

CAREX DIVULSA / EUROPEAN GREY SEDGE

CYPERUS ERAGROSTIS / TALL UMBRELLA SEDGE

ELYMUS GLAUCUS / BLUE WILDRYE

ELYMUS TRITICOIDES / CREEPING WILD RYE

ESCHSCHOLZIA CALIFORNICA / CALIFORNIA POPPY

FESTUCA MICROSTACHYS / SMALL FESCUE

FESTUCA RUBRA / RED FESCUE

HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM / MEADOW BARLEY

JUNCUS PATENS / CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH

LEYMUS CONDENSATUS / GIANT WILD RYE

STIPA PULCHRA / PURPLE NEEDLE GRASS
EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX 206,182 SF
SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE (SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

BROMUS CARINATUS / CALIFORNIA BROME

ELYMUS ARENARIUS 'GLAUCUS' / BLUE LYME GRASS

FESTUCA IDAHOENSIS / IDAHO FESCUE

HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM CALIFORNICUM / CALIFORNIA MEADOW BARLEY

LUPINUS BICOLOR / MINIATURE LUPINE

POA SECUNDA / BLUEGRASS

PRUNELLA VULGARIS / SELF-HEAL

SISYRINCHIUM BELLUM / BLUE-EYED GRASS
TURF 5,794 SF

DELTA BLUEGRASS
90/10 TALL FESCUE MIX

AMERISTAR - MONTAGE II

CLASSIC STYLE
8' TALL

HIGH SECURITY FENCE
SHADE TREES (24" BOX MINIMUM) 54

SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE
(SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE

CEDRUS DEODARA / DEODAR CEDAR

FRAXINUS VELUTINA / VELVET ASH

PISTACIA CHINENSIS / CHINESE PISTACHE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA / COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS ILEX / HOLLY OAK
ACCENT TREES (24" BOX MINIMUM) 14

SELECT PRELIMINARY PLANTS MAY INCLUDE
(SUBJECT TO CHANGE):

ARBUTUS X 'MARINA' / MARINA STRAWBERRY TREE

CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS / WESTERN REDBUD

GINKGO BILOBA / MAIDENHAIR TREE

ONSITE CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE OFFSITE CONCEPT PLANT SCHEDULE 392

1. THE WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE APPLICABLE CITY AND/OR REGIONAL STANDARDS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN COPIES OF THESE

STANDARDS, SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS, AS WELL AS ALL OTHER STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHICH MAY BE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE AND ACCURATELY INTERPRET THESE PLANS.

2. ALL QUANTITIES LISTED IN THE LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. IN THE CASE OF ANY DISCREPANCIES, PLANS SHALL OVERRIDE THE LANDSCAPE AND BID SCHEDULE QUANTITIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND BASE THEIR BID ACCORDINGLY.

3. RESPONSIBILITY FOR ESTABLISHING SUBGRADES IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS WORK. INSPECT SUBGRADES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK TO CONFIRM SUBGRADE DEPTHS AND GRADES. ADVISE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF DISCREPANCIES WITH DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE LEFT FREE OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND/OR TOXIC MATERIAL AND GRADED TO A LEVEL TO PERMIT LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION. TRENCHES OR OTHER FILLED EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE COMPACTED PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION.

4. SITE GRADING NECESSITATED BY THE WORK AS IT PROGRESSES AND NOT SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT ON THE PLANS WILL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL WORK.

5. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE UNIFORMLY GRADED SO THAT FINISHED SURFACES CONFORM TO THE TYPICAL SECTIONS AND PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN. FINISHED SURFACES SHALL BE REASONABLY SMOOTH, COMPACTED, AND FREE FROM IRREGULAR SURFACE DRAINAGE. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR

ESTABLISHING THE FINISH GRADE AND SHALL BEAR FINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROPER SURFACE DRAINAGE OF PLANTED AREAS.

6. AFTER ROUGH GRADING HAS OCCURRED, CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT AND SUBMIT TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO AMENDMENTS AND/OR PLANTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

7. BACKFILL MIX SHALL BE PLACED IN 6" LIFTS AND TAMPED INTO PLACE AROUND THE PLANT. NO TRANSPLANTING SHALL BE DONE WHEN SOIL IS EXCESSIVELY WET. DO NOT COUNTERSINK AROUND CACTI OR SUCCULENTS. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM PLANT.

8. ALL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET, ALL SHRUBS AND ACCENTS A MINIMUM OF 24", AND ALL GROUNDCOVERS 18" FROM EDGE OF CURBS, WALKS, WALLS, PADS, ETC., UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

9. EXCAVATE PITS, AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS AND DETAILS. LOOSEN HARD SUBSOIL IN BOTTOM OF PIT. TEST DRAINAGE OF TREE, SHRUB AND PLANT PITS BY FILLING WITH WATER TWICE IN SUCCESSION. THE RETENTION OF WATER IN PLANTING PITS FOR MORE THAN TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. SUBMIT IN WRITING A PROPOSAL FOR THE CORRECTION TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR APPROVAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK.

10. IF ROCK, UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION, ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN EXCAVATION FOR PLANTING OF ANY PLANT MATERIAL, NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. NEW

LOCATIONS MAY BE SELECTED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, OR INSTRUCTIONS MAY BE ISSUED TO DIRECT REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTION. PROCEED WITH WORK ONLY AFTER APPROVAL OF THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.

11. DO NOT MAKE SUBSTITUTIONS. IF SPECIFIED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL IS NOT OBTAINABLE, SUBMIT PROOF OF

NON-AVAILABILITY FROM AT LEAST FIVE SOURCES TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE, TOGETHER WITH PROPOSAL FOR USE OF EQUIVALENT MATERIAL FOR FINAL APPROVAL.

12. ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND SPECIFICATIONS TO CONFORM TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK STANDARDS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

13. LAY OUT INDIVIDUAL TREE AND PLANT LOCATIONS AND AREAS FOR MULTIPLE PLANTINGS, STAKE LOCATIONS AND OUTLINE AREAS AND SECURE THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE'S ACCEPTANCE BEFORE START OF PLANTING WORK. MAKE MINOR ADJUSTMENTS AS DIRECTED.

14. ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE A FULL HEAD THAT COVERS THE CAN DIAMETER (CAN FULL) AND A MINIMUM OF THREE STEMS/BRANCHES.

15. FINISH GRADE FOR PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE 1" BELOW ALL CURBS, WALKS AND PAVING WITH SMOOTH EVEN LINES AT EDGES OF STRUCTURES.

16. FINISH LANDSCAPE GRADES SHALL SLOPE AT A 2% GRADE AWAY FROM CURBS, WALKS, AND WALLS.

17. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A 3" DEPTH OF MULCH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE PLANS. TREES TO HAVE A 6' DIAMETER RING AROUND TRUNK FREE OF MULCH. MULCH SHALL EXTEND UNDER ALL SHRUBS AND PLANTS.

APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE PRIOR TO AND AFTER MULCH INSTALLATION.

18. PROVIDE SAMPLES OF PROPOSED MULCH SHOWING COLOR, GRADATION SIZE RANGE AND TEXTURE INCLUDING PROPOSED SOURCE. PROVIDE 1/2 CUBIC FOOT SAMPLE OF EACH.

19. NO JOB WILL BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE UNTIL ALL CURBS, PAVEMENT AND SIDEWALKS HAVE BEEN SWEPT CLEAN OF ALL DIRT AND DEBRIS ACCORDING TO PLANS.

20. IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN ANY PERMITS REQUIRED. (SEE THE CITY GENERAL

CONDITIONS)

21. ALL CONSTRUCTION ROADS AND COMPACTED AREAS DEVELOPED THROUGH CONSTRUCTION THAT ARE WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND LOOSENED TO A DEPTH OF 12" PRIOR TO LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WORK BEGINNING.

22. PLANTINGS WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHALL BE MAINTAINED SO THAT NO LIMBS HANG LOWER THAN SEVEN (7) FEET AND SHRUBS OR OTHER PLANTS PLANTED WITHIN THE SIGHT VISIBILITY TRIANGLE LINE SHALL BE NO TALLER THAN TWO (2) FEET AT FULL GROWTH.

GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES
393

1. THE TERM “LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT” USED HEREIN SHALL MEAN THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WHO HAS SIGNED AND SEALED THESE PLANS AND IS IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN. THE TERM “CONTRACTOR” USED HEREIN SHALL MEAN ANY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR USING THESE PLANS.

ANY AGENCY SIGNATURE OR APPROVAL ON THESE PLANS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF ANY OF THESE NOTES.

2. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL NOT PROVIDE, OBSERVE, COMMENT ON NOR ENFORCE ANY SAFETY MEASURES OR REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DESIGN, CONSTRUCT, AND MAINTAIN ALL SAFETY MEASURES AND

SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME AND COMPLYING WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS, LAWS, AND REGULATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT SHE/HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND

COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOBSITE CONDITIONS AND SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS.

3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S MEANS AND

METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, TECHNIQUES, EQUIPMENT CHOICE AND USAGE, SEQUENCE, SCHEDULE, SAFETY

PROGRAMS, OR SAFETY PRACTICES, NOR SHALL THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HAVE ANY AUTHORITY OR RESPONSIBILITY TO STOP OR DIRECT THE WORK OF ANY CONTRACTOR.

4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND OWNER, THEIR AGENTS

AND EMPLOYEES, HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, JUDGMENTS, LOSS, DAMAGES, COSTS,

EXPENSES, FEES OR LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH, IN WHOLE OR IN PART,

DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.

5. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THESE PLANS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING FROM

THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND THE OWNER, AN INTERPRETATION BEFORE DOING ANY RELATED OR IMPACTED WORK.

6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE THE NECESSARY STEPS TO PROTECT THE PROPERTY FROM ANY EROSION AND

SILTATION THAT RESULT FROM CONTRACTOR OPERATIONS BY APPROPRIATE MEANS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE

PROJECT IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED FOR MAINTENANCE BY WHOMEVER IS TO BE ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE.

7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK NEAR THEIR FACILITIES AND SHALL COORDINATE WORK WITH UTILITY COMPANY REPRESENTATIVES.

8. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM A SEARCH OF READILY AVAILABLE RECORDS. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF SAID UTILITY INFORMATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE PRECAUTIONARY

MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN HEREON AND ANY OTHERS NOT OF RECORD OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. ALL DAMAGES THERETO CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE APPROPRIATE SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS AT THE SOLE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR.

9. THE LOCATION, ELEVATIONS, SIZE, TYPE AND CONDITION OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT TO THE

PROPOSED WORK INDICATED ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR BY FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF NEW WORK. THE CONTRACTOR WILL

IMMEDIATELY INFORM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTING INFORMATION IS FOUND.

10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE EXPLORATORY EXCAVATIONS AND LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AS

NEEDED, SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF CONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT REVISIONS TO PLANS IF REVISIONS ARE NECESSARY

DUE TO THE ACTUAL LOCATION, SIZE, TYPE, OR CONDITION OF EXISTING FACILITIES DIFFERING FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS.

11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL OF ANY DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND REPLACEMENT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER.

12. SHOULD CONFLICTING INFORMATION BE FOUND ON THE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK IN QUESTION.

13. ANYTHING MENTIONED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, IF ANY, AND NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS, OR SHOWN ON THE

DRAWINGS AND NOT MENTIONED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS, SHALL BE OF LIKE EFFECT AS IF SHOWN OR MENTIONED IN BOTH.

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT NOTES
394

PRELIMINARY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ESTIMATED WATER USE
TOTAL WATER USE IS CALCULATED BY SUMMING THE AMOUNT OF WATER ESTIMATED FOR EACH HYDROZONE. WATER USE FOR EACH HYDROZONE IS ESTIMATED WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULA:

ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) = GAL / YEAR PER HYDROZONE ET ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (ETAF) =

0.55 ETAF FOR RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE

0.45 ETAF FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE

0.8 ETAF FOR EXISTING NON-REHABILITATED LANDSCAPE
SPECIAL LANDSCAPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 ETAF
PLANT FACTOR (PF) = WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES HYDROZONE AREA (HA) = (SF OF LANDSCAPE) OR (32 SF / TREE) CONVERSION FACTOR (CONVERTS ACRE-INCHES PER ACRE PER YEAR TO GALLONS PER SQUARE FOOT PER YEAR = 0.62 IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY (IE) = 0.75 (OVERHEAD SPRAY) 0.81 (DRIP) SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA (SLA) = SF OF EDIBLE PLANTS, RECREATIONAL AREAS, AREAS IRRIGATED WITH RECYCLED WATER, OR WATER FEATURS USING RECYCLED WATER
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION RATE (ETo) = QUANTITY OF WATER EVAPORATED FROM ADJ. SOIL AND TRANSPIRED BY PLANTS OVER A SPECIFIED TIME ETWU = [(ETo) * (PF) * (HA) * (0.62)] / (IE)
MAWA = (ETo) * (0.62) [ETAF) * (SUM OF SLA & HA)] + [(1-ETAF) * (SLA)] HYDROZONE "A" (LOW WATER USE - DRIPLINE ) STANDARD LANDSCAPE (ON-SITE)

ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR)

45.30 0.30 152,512 0.62 0.81 - 1,586,463.72 HYDROZONE "B" (LOW WATER USE - ROTATORS) EROSION CONTROL SEED MIX (ON-SITE)

ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR)

45.30 0.30 206,431 0.62 0.75 - 2,319,128.43 HYDROZONE "C" (LOW WATER USE - ROTATORS) STORMWATER TREATMENT SEED MIX (ON-SITE)

ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR)

45.30 0.30 115,548 0.62 0.75 - 1,298,112.45 HYDROZONE "D" (MODERATE WATER USE - BUBBLERS) TREES (ON-SITE)

ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR)

45.30 0.40 7,168 0.62 0.81 - 99,417.51 HYDROZONE "E" (HIGH WATER USE - ROTORS ) TURF (ON-SITE)

ETO PF HA CONVERSION FACTOR IE SLA ETWU (GAL/YEAR)

45.30 0.60 0.62 0.75 6,318 141,957.88 ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (GAL/YEAR) 5,303,122.10

MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA)

ETO SUM OF HA CONVERSION FACTOR ETAF SUM OF SLA MAWA(GAL/YEAR)

45.30 481,659.00 0.62 0.45 6,318.00 6,264,990.95

MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE (GAL/YEAR)
6,264,990.95
MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE PERCENT OF ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE 84.65% 395

Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan B-1

APPENDIX C: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

397

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM

Page Number 1.0-
1 . 0 I N T R O D U C T I O N
Section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires all State and local agencies to establish monitoring or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency whenever approval involves the adoption of either a “mitigated neg ative declaration” or specified environmental findings related to environmental impact reports.

The following is the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan (proposed Specific Plan, or proposed project). The intent of the MMRP is to ensure implementation of the mitigation measures identified within the Final Program Environmental Impact Report ( PEIR) for this project. Unless otherwise noted, the cost of implementing the mitigation measures as prescribed by this MMRP shall be funded by the applicant.

COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST
The MMRP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the PEIR for the Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan prepared by the City of Pittsburg. This MMRP is intended to be used by City staff and mitigation monitoring personnel to ensure compliance with mitigation measures during project implementation. Mitigation measures identified in this MMRP were developed in the EIR that was prepared for the proposed project.

The PEIR presents a detailed set of mitigation measures that will be implemented throughout the lifetime of the project. Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines, Section 15370, as a measure that:
• Avoids the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; • Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation;
• Rectifies the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment; • Reduces or eliminates the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project; or
• Compensates for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments The intent of the MMRP is to ensure the implementation of adopted mitigation measures by applicants during the design, permitting and construction phases of future development within the Plan Area . The MMRP provides for design measures that will be implemented during final engineering and confirmed during plan check for each phase of development within the Plan Aera.

The MMRP also will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary and in -the-field identification and resolution of environmental concerns.

Monitoring and documenting the implementation of mitigation measures will be coordinated by the City of Pittsburg. The table attached to this report identifies the mitigation measure, the monitoring action for the mitigation measure, the responsible party for the monitoring action, and timing of the monitoring action. The applicant will be responsible for fully understanding and effectively implementing the mitigation measures contained within the MMRP. The City will be responsible for monitoring compliance.
398

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING

PROGRAM

During construction of future development within the Plan Area, the City will assign an inspector(s) who will be responsible for field monitoring of mitigation measure compliance. The inspector(s) will report to the City Planning Department and will be thoroughly familiar with permit conditions and the MMRP.

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The following table indicates the mitigation measure number, the impact the measure is designed to address, the measure text, the monitoring agency, implementation schedule, and an area for sign- off indicating compliance.

399

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program - Pittsburg Technology Park Specific Plan IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
SECTION 3.2, AIR QUALITY

3.2-2 Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is
nonattainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality
standard
MM 3.2 -1 Prior to approval of subsequent development
applications by the Zoning Administrator, applicants shall provide a project-level construction air quality analysis to determine the significance of air quality impacts. Specific construction activities shall be compared to BAAQMD screening criteria to determine if a more detailed emissions analysis is required to determine significance. If a quantitative analysis of emissions during project construction is required, the estimated emissions shall be compared to BAAQMD significance thresholds. Mitigation measures necessary to reduce any significant impacts shall be developed in coordination with the BAAQMD and shall include BAAQMD’s basic best management practices for construction - related fugitive dust emissions as follows:
• All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day.
• All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered.
• All visible mud or dirt trackout onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street
sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power
sweeping is prohibited.
• All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph.
• All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved
shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads
shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless
seeding or soil binders are used.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

400

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
• All excavation, grading, and/or demolition activities shall be suspended when average wind speeds exceed
20 mph.
• All trucks and equipment, including their tires, shall be washed off prior to leaving the site.
• Unpaved roads providing access to sites located 100
feet or further from a paved road shall be treated with a 6- to 12-inch layer of compacted layer of wood chips, mulch, or gravel.
• Publicly visible signs shall be posted with the telephone number and name of the person to contact at the lead
agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall
respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s General Air Pollution Complaints number
shall also be visible to ensure compliance with
applicable regulations.

MM 3.2 -2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall show on the grading plans via notation that the contractor shall ensure that all offroad heavy -duty diesel - powered equipment larger than 100 horsepower (e.g., rubber tired dozers, excavators, graders, scrapers, pavers, paving equipment, and cranes) to be used for each phase of construction of the project (i.e., owned, leased, and subcontractor vehicles) shall meet USEPA emissions standards for Tier 4 engines or equivalent. The grading plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer.

City Engineer Prior to issuance of
a grading permit

MM 3.2 -3 To minimize emissions of fugitive dust, future development shall be required to implement the following enhanced best management practices, which shall be notated on grading plans prior to approval:

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

401

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF

1. Limit the simultaneous occurrence of excavation,
grading, and ground-disturbing construction activities.

2. Install wind breaks (e.g., trees, fences) on the windward side(s) of actively disturbed areas of construction. Wind breaks should have at maximum 50 percent air porosity.

3. Plant vegetative ground cover (e.g., fast -germinating native grass seed) in disturbed areas as soon as possible and watered appropriately until vegetation is
established.

4. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent.

5. Minimize the amount of excavated material or waste
materials stored at the site.

6. Hydroseed or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers to
construction areas, including previously graded areas,
that are inactive for at least 10 calendar days.

Due to the potential for full project buildout to include land use types that generate diesel truck trips beyond what was estimated in the CalEEMod modeling analysis, the following conditional mitigation measure may be required.

MM 3.2-4 If a future development application includes a land use type that would generate diesel truck trips during project operation (such as logistics and warehousing), then prior to approval by the zoning administrator, a project -level air quality analysis shall be performed in conformance with General Plan Actions 2 -A-4.b. and c. The analysis shall include, but not be limited to, quantification of operational criteria air pollutant emissions, a determination of operational air quality impacts, and identification of mitigation measures necessary to reduce any significant impacts.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

402

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF

3.2-3 Expose sensitive receptors
to substantial pollutant
concentrations
MM 3.2-5 If a future development application includes a land use type that would generate diesel truck trips during project operation (such as logistics and warehousing), then prior to approval by the Zoning Administrator, then a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shall be performed in conformance with 2040 General Plan Action 2-A-4.c . The analysis shall evaluate potential impacts from directly emitted TAC and PM2.5, as specified in Chapter 5 of BAAQMD’s 2022 CEQA Guidelines. The guidelines recommend a tiered approach where at each successive step, the project’s impacts (i.e., annual PM2.5 concentrations, cancer risks, and hazards), and the combined cumulative impacts from
surrounding sources and the project, are compared to the appropriate thresholds of signific ance. Projects shall not be approved until it can be demonstrated that the project would not result in exceedance of the established thresholds of significance for public health risks at nearby sensitive receptors.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

3.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES

3.3-1 Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat
modifications, on any
species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in
local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or
by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service
MM 3.3-1 Each applicant will be required to obtain coverage for the project under the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP. This shall include submittal of all required application materials per HCP/NCCP Section 6.2.1 and payment of a Development Fee and applicable fees for wetland impacts and/or stream corridor encroachments consistent with current HCP/NCCP requirements.

Alternatively, the applicant may, in accordance with the terms of PMC Section 15.108, offer to dedicate land in lieu of some or all of the HCP/NCCP Development Fee.

All applicable fees shall be paid, and/or an “in -lieu-of-fee” agreement fully executed, prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the project. If a grading permit is not required, fee payment and/or an “in -lieu-of-fee” agreement shall be fully executed prior to issuance of the project’s building permit. Proof of applicable fees and/or “in -lieu-of-fee” agreement shall be provided to the City of Pittsburg Community Development City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

East Contra Costa
County Habitat
Conservancy
Prior to issuance of
a grading permit

403

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
Director as a condition of approval for future projects under the Specific Plan.

MM 3.3 -2 Each applicant will be required to provide Worker Environmental Awareness training to all construction personnel.

The WEAP shall include the following information.
• The sensitive habitats on the study area.
• Special-status species known or potentially present on the site, including their:
o Listing status and causes of decline,
o Habitat preferences, and
o Distinguishing physical characteristics.
• The measures (AMMs and East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP
measures) required to protect sensitive habitats and
special-status species, including next steps and
notifications in the event of a special -status species sighting.

The WEAP shall include a hard copy handout that summarizes information presented in the training and includes photographs of habitat resources and species to facilitate identification in the field by construction personnel.

Each applicant shall ensure that all construction personnel undergo WEAP training before they begin work. Training shall be delivered by a qualified biologist approved by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Director and shall be provided
bilingually in English and Spanish if appropriate.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to issuance of
a grading permit

MM 3.3-3 Each applicant shall ensure that the project adheres to all applicable East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP requirements.

Pre-Construction Surveys
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

Prior to issuance of
a grading permit

404

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
Planning surveys per HCP/NCCP Section 6.3.1 were completed in 2018 – 2023. Based on the outcomes of the planning surveys, preconstruction surveys by USFWS - and CDFW -approved
biologists shall be conducted for the following species per HCP/NCCP Sections 6.3.2:
• Golden Eagle
• Burrowing Owl
• Swainson’s Hawk
• San Joaquin kit fox
If preconstruction surveys determine that any of the above species is present on the site (or, for the bird species, within a distance where they could be disturbed by construction activity), the biologist may recommend construction monitoring; if so, then each applicant shall ensure that monitoring is conducted per HCP/NCCP Section 6.3.3. This will include submittal of a Construction Monitoring Plan (CMP) to the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy for approval; the CMP must be submitted and approv ed prior to issuance of the grading permit (or, if no grading permit is required, the building permit) for the proposed project.

Based on results of the planning surveys, which indicate that no suitable habitat is available on the study area, preconstruction surveys and construction monitoring are not required for the following species:
• Covered shrimp species
• Giant garter snake
• Townsend’s big-eared bat
Jurisdiction Delineations
A delineation of jurisdictional wetlands and other waters shall be conducted on the project site per HCP Sections 6.2.1 and 6.3.1.

East Contra Costa
County Habitat
Conservancy
405

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
Each applicant shall also comply with all applicable provisions of East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP Section 6.4, Specific Conditions on Covered Activities, as follows:
• Section 6.4.1: Landscape-Level Measures
o Conservation Measure 1.10 – Maintain
Hydrologic Conditions and Minimize Erosion
o Conservation Measure 1.11 – Avoid Direct
Impacts on Extremely Rare Plants, Fully
Protected Wildlife Species [and] Covered
Migratory Birds
o Conservation Measure 1.7 – Establish Stream
Setbacks
o Conservation Measure 1.14 – Design
Requirements for Covered Roads outside the
UDA
• Section 6.4.2: Natural Community–Level Measures
o Conservation Measure 2.12 – Wetland, Pond,
and Stream Avoidance and Minimization
• Section 6.4.3: Species-Level Measures for the following species
o California tiger salamander
o Burrowing Owl
o Golden Eagle
o Swainson’s Hawk
o San Joaquin kit fox
o California Red-legged Frog
MM 3.3-4 Rare Plant Survey & Protection
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
If project
construction begins
in 2025 or later;

406

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
MM 3.3 -4a If project construction begins in 2025 or later, an updated protocol-level rare plant survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist/botanist who is familiar with the rare plants of the project region and has been approved by the City of Pittsburg Community Devel opment Director. Surveys shall be conducted prior to construction, with enough lead time to allow for the follow-up actions described below, if they are warranted. Surveys shall be conducted during the peak blooming periods of the target species and shall cover all potentially suitable habitats within the study area and surrounding 250 -foot-wide buffer. Target species and blooming periods are listed in the table below; the table is highlighted to group species with similar blooming periods. If no special-status plants are documented within the area to be disturbed for project construction (including staging and access), no further action is required.

MM 3.3 -4b. If special -status plants covered by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP, or plants designated as “no take” by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP, are present on the site, the relevant survey report(s) shall be submitted to the East Contra Costa Habitat Conservancy per HCP/NCCP Section 6.3.1.

If any of the following species covered by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP is found to be present, each applicant shall promptly notify the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy of the species’ presence and the planned construction schedule, to enable the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy to salvage the occurrence(s) in accordance with HCP/NCCP
Conservation Measure 3.10 (Plant Salvage when Impacts Are Unavoidable). Each applicant shall confirm with the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy that the take limits established by the HCP/NCCP for the species in question have not been breached:
• Big tarplant
• Mount Diablo fairy lantern
• Diablo helianthella

CDFW

East Contra Costa
County Habitat
Conservancy
Prior to
construction
407

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
• Showy golden madia
• Adobe navarretia
Under no circumstance shall any of the following HCP/NCCP “no - take” plants be harmed:
• Large-flowered fiddleneck
• Alkali milkvetch
• Mt. Diablo buckwheat
• Diamond-petaled poppy
• Contra Costa goldfields
• Caper-fruited tropidocarpum
Due to their extreme rarity, none of these species are expected to be present within the Plan Area, but if any of them are found, each applicant shall notify the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy immediately and shall work with the Conservancy to determine and execute the appropriate course of action.

MM 3.3 -4c If any special -status plant not covered by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP is found to be present, the occurrence(s) shall be avoided and protected in place to the extent feasible. If the occurrence(s) cannot be entirely avoided, then a Plant Salvage and Mitigation Plan shall be prepared and implemented. The Plan shall be prepared by a qualified biologist/botanist who is familiar with the rare plants of the project region and has experience conducting rare plant salvage operations. Plant salvage techniques shall be consistent with those outlined in HCP/NCCP Conservation Measure 3.10. The plan shall, at a minimum, include the following.
• Quantity and species of plants to be planted
or transplanted
• Location of the mitigation/transplant site(s)
408

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
• Salvage methods, such as
relocation/transplantation, seed collection,
etc., including storage locations and methods
to preserve the plants
• Procedures for propagating collected seed,
including storage methods
• Planting procedures, including the use of soil
preparation and irrigation
• Schedule and action plan to maintain and
monitor the mitigation/transplant site for a
minimum 3-year period
• Interim and final success criteria and
corrective action thresholds (e.g., growth,
plant cover, survivorship)
• Potential corrective actions/contingency
measures in the event interim success criteria
are not being met (e.g.., weed removal,
supplemental irrigation, supplemental
plantings, etc.).
• Reporting requirements and procedures,
including the contents of annual progress
reports, report submittals, review/approval
responsibilities, etc.

Each applicant shall be responsible for ensuring that the Plant Salvage and Mitigation Plan is implemented. The Plan shall be implemented under the oversight of the biologist/botanist who prepared it or another individual with equivalent qualifications.

The biologist shall be approved by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Director.

MM 3.3 -5 No more than one year prior to the initiation of vegetation removal and grading in the project area, each applicant shall retain an appropriately qualified biologist (see next City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
No more than one
year prior to the
initiation of

409

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
paragraph) who has been approved by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Director to conduct surveys for Crotch bumble bee, obscure bumble bee, and American bumble bee.

Biologist qualifications for bumble bee surveys will conform to current CDFW gui dance prevailing at the time surveys are performed.

Surveys shall be performed by a qualified entomologist familiar with the species’ behavior. If surveys are performed prior to CESA (and if applicable, ESA) listing for any species, they shall comprise the following activities, consistent with CDFW’s Survey Considerations for CESA Candidate Bumble Bee Species. In the event any bumble bee species is listed at the time of survey, surveys will instead adhere to the protocol(s) adopted by the listing agency/agencies (CDFW and/or USFWS).
• Surveys shall be conducted during each species’ peak
worker activity period. Surveys shall cover all areas of onsite habitat determined by the biologist to be suitable for any of the three target bumble bee species, based
on habitat mapping conducted for t he project to date.

A minimum of three to four surveys shall be conducted,
spaced two weeks apart; the total number, timing, and
duration of surveys performed shall depend on the
biologist’s judgment, in consideration of weather, site conditions, and protocol requirements. Surveys shall be designed to identify all foraging bumble bee species; a single survey may be used to detect all species with
peak activity periods including the survey date.
• If Crotch bumble bee, obscure bumble bee, or American bumble bee is observed onsite during the surveys, an
additional survey or surveys shall be conducted to
determine whether a nest or colony is present, unless
the biologist is satisfied that the initial survey(s) were sufficient to rule out the presence of nests/colonies.
• If a nest or colony is present onsite, the biologist shall establish an appropriate avoidance buffer determined

CDFW

USFWS
vegetation removal
and grading
410

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
in consideration of site conditions, the species involved, and the construction activities planned prior to the
close of the nesting season. No entry into the buffer
shall be permitted. The buffer shall be delineated in the field using orange construction fencing or another
appropriate medium, under the biologist’s oversight,
and shall remain in place until the end of the nesting
species’ gyne flying season, or until the qualified
biologist determines that the nest has been abandoned.
• If no nest/colony is present onsite, no further action will be taken. However, all workers shall be required to
avoid injury and mortality to bumble bees they may
encounter; this requirement shall be discussed during
the WEAP training and shall be reiterated to all workers if special-status bumble bees are confirmed onsite.
• To support improved understanding and conservation
of all three bumble bee species, survey results, including negative findings, shall be submitted to CDFW prior to
implementing project -related ground -disturbing
activities. At a minimum, the survey report shall include the following information.

1. A description and map of the survey area,
focusing on areas that could provide suitable
habitat for Crotch bumble bee, obscure bumble
bee, or American bumble bee

2. Field survey conditions, including name(s) of
qualified entomologist(s) and brief
qualifications; date(s) and time(s) of survey;
survey duration; general weather conditions;
survey goals; and species searched

3. Map(s) showing the location of nests/colonies, if
any
A description of physical (e.g., soil, moisture, slope) and biological (e.g., plant composition) conditions where each nest/colony is 411

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
found, including native plant composition (e.g., density, cover, and abundance) within impacted habitat (e.g., species list separated by vegetation class; density, cover, and abundance of each species) 5. The measures that will be implemented to avoid adverse effects on the bumble bee species present 6. An assessment of potential project effects on special -status bumble bees during project construction and project
operation/maintenance, with avoidance and minimization
measures in place.

MM 3.3 -6 The following measures will be required to protect monarch butterflies prior to ESA (and, if applicable, CESA) listing.

In the event monarch butterfly is ESA- and/or CESA-listed at the time of project construction, monarch butterfly protection requirements will instead adhere to the protocol(s) adopted by the listing agency/agencies (CDFW and/or USFWS).
• No more than two days prior to the initiation of
vegetation trimming or removal for construction, each
applicant shall ensure that a qualified biologist
approved by the City of Pittsburg Community
Development Director surveys all areas of potentially
suitable habitat for monarch butterfly larval host plants. • If host plants are found, the biologist shall survey all host plants for monarch eggs, larvae, and pupae. If no
eggs, larvae, or pupae are found, plants may be
removed within two days.

If eggs, larvae, or pupae are present, host plants shall be protected in place until the biologist has determined that no more eggs, larvae, or pupae are present.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development

CDFW

USFWS
Prior to
construction

MM 3.3 -7 The following measures will be required to protect western pond turtles prior to ESA (and, if applicable, CESA) listing.

In the event western pond turtle is ESA- and/or CESA-listed at the time of project construction, western pond turtle protections will City of Pittsburg
Community
Development

CDFW

Prior to
construction

412

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
instead adhere to the protocol(s) adopted by the listing agency/agencies (CDFW and/or USFWS).
• Prior to the start of construction activities, each
applicant shall ensure that a qualified biologist
approved by the City of Pittsburg Community
Development Director conducts a pedestrian
preconstruction survey of the study area and adjacent
suitable habitat for western pond turtle.
• The survey shall be conducted no more than 24 hours
prior to start of work and shall include walking the work area limits and interior and investigating all areas that could be used by the species.
• If western pond turtle individuals are found, the
biologist shall relocate them to suitable habitat outside the disturbance area and far enough away that they
would not be expected to return.
• If the biologist determines that it is warranted,
exclusion measures shall be implemented to prevent
individuals returning to the active work site.

The same requirements will apply for operations and
maintenance activities with the potential to affect western pond turtle habitat.

USFWS
MM 3.3-8 If project-related disturbance (e.g., vegetation removal or trimming, clearing/grubbing, grading) commences any time during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species potentially nesting in or near the Plan Area (February 1 – August 31 for most species; January 1 through August 31 for Golden Eagle; March 15 – September 15 for Swainson’s Hawk), a
preconstruction survey for n esting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist approved by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Director, using binoculars. The survey shall take place no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of work.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development

CDFW

East Contra Costa
County Habitat
Conservancy
During construction
if it is during
nesting/breeding
season of native
bird species

413

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
If active nests are found in areas that could be directly affected or are within 300 feet of disturbance activities and would be subject to prolonged noise, a no-disturbance buffer zone shall be created around active nests for the remainder of the breeding season or until the biologist determines that all young have fledged or that the nest has been abandoned. No entry into the no-activity buffer shall be permitted. The no -activity buffer shall be delineated in the field by or under the supervision of the b iologist, using temporary construction fencing or another suitable low -impact medium. The size of the buffer zone(s) shall be determined by the biologist based on the species involved, the amount of vegetative and other screening between the nest and areas where
construction activity shall take place, and, if appropriate, other site-specific factors. The minimum buffer width shall be 50 feet for species other than raptors, and a minimum of 500 feet for raptor species other than Golden Eagle and Swainson’s Hawk, and may be enlarged by taking into account factors such as the following:
• Noise and human disturbance levels at the construction site at the time of the survey and the noise and
disturbance expected during the construction activity.
• Sensitivity of nesting species and behaviors of the
individual nesting birds.

If nesting Swainson’s Hawk or Golden Eagle are observed, buffers and other avoidance measures shall conform to Species -Level Measures for these species as laid out in East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP Section 6.4.3. or current CDFW requirements,
whichever is greater.

MM 3.3-9 The following requirements apply to construction and to operations and maintenance that involves disturbance that could affect nesting activity, such as vegetation removal or trimming, clearing/grubbing, and grading.

Bald Eagle nests may be built throughout the year. Consequently, each applicant shall retain a qualified biologist approved by the City of Pittsburg
Community
Development

East Contra Costa
County Habitat
Conservancy
Prior to initial or
subsequent
construction
activities

414

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
City of Pittsburg Community Development Director to conduct a preconstruction survey for nesting Bald Eagles prior to the initiation of work at the site (including vegetation removal or trimming, clearing/grubbing, grading, etc.). The survey shall be conducted using binoculars and shall take place no more than two weeks prior to the initiation of work.

If an occupied or active nest is present, construction -related activity shall be prohibited within 0.5 mile of the nest unless site- specific conditions or the nature of the construction activity (e.g., dense vegetation, limited noise generation, limited ac tivities) indicate that a smaller buffer could be appropriate or that a larger buffer should be implemented. The biologist shall coordinate with the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy, CDFW, and USFWS to determine the appropriate buffer size.

The nest buffer shall be delineated in the field using temporary construction fencing or another suitable low -impact medium.

Buffer fencing shall be placed only on the Plan Area; the buffer shall not be put in place on neighboring properties not involved in project construction and staging.

Construction shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to ensure that the buffer remains in place and that no construction activities occur within the buffer zone until the biologist has determined that the young have fledged or that the nest has been abandoned.

CDFW

USFWS
MM 3.3-10 Prior to the initiation of any activity that could disturb roosting bats (including vegetation trimming/removal, surveys involving the use of lasers that produce high -frequency sounds, drilling, or other activity producing high -frequency sounds, a qualified biologist (as stipulated in Section 5 of H.T. Harvey & Associates 2019, and subject to approval by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Director) shall conduct a habitat evaluation for special-status bats, focusing on the needs of pallid bat, west ern red bat, and hoary bat, the species identified by planning surveys as having potential to be present on the site. For purposes of this AMM, high frequency sound is defined as sound

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

CDFW
Prior to the
initiation of any
activity that could
disturb roosting
bats

415

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
in the 20 kHz – 50 kHz frequency range, based on bat disturbance information in California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) bat mitigation guidelines (ibid). If Caltrans guidance is updated, or if frequency sensitivity information relevant to the ba t species with potential to occur becomes available prior to project construction, this definition shall be updated accordingly.

Surveys shall include the entirety of the study area plus a 400 - foot-wide buffer. If no roosting habitat suitable for these species is present on the study area, no further action is required. If roosting habitat is present, the following additional requirements shall apply. Any potential roost trees/other potential roosting habitat shall also be considered potential bat maternity roosts. • Before any activities with the potential to disturb
roosting bats begin, the approved biologist(s) shall
conduct focused surveys for roost occupancy. These
shall be conducted at least two weeks prior to the start of work and shall include:
o Daytime visual surveys for bats and evidence
of bat presence such as guano or urine
staining
o Evening emergence and acoustic surveys
If bat presence is confirmed, the species, number of
individuals, and roost type (maternity/non -maternity)
shall be documented and reported to the CNDDB. Bats
shall not be disturbed or relocated during the surveys. • Confirmed non-maternity roosts shall be protected by
buffers. Buffers shall be delineated in the field with
temporary construction fencing or another suitable
measure, installed under biologist oversight. Note that buffer distances vary depending on the species and the
type of noise/disturbance involved. (If bat species other than those addressed here are encountered, buffer
distances shall be consistent with H.T. Harvey &
Associates 2019). The biologist shall coordinate with
416

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
construction staff to determine the appropriate buffer
width; if there is uncertainty, the more conservative
buffer width shall prevail.

If a confirmed roost must be removed or trimmed for
construction, or if work must occur within the buffers
laid out above, work shall be restricted to daylight hours when the CDFW approved biologist has confirmed that
it the roost is not occupied and shall be overseen by the biologist to prevent injury or mortality. The biologist shall have authority to divert or stop work in the event of excessive risk to bats.
• Confirmed maternity roosts shall be protected by the
same buffers identified above. Maternity roosts shall
not be removed unless removal cannot be avoided, and
in no case shall a confirmed maternity roost be removed during the breeding/non-volant season (April – August).

If removal of a maternity roost is necessary, each
applicant shall consult with CDFW to determine
appropriate compensatory mitigation such as the
provision of bat boxes and shall submit a Bat Habitat
Mitigation Plan for DFW approval. Consultation and
submittal of the Mitigation Plan shall occur prior to the removal, and the removal shall not take place until
CDFW has approved the Plan. Each applicant shall then
be responsible for implementing CDFW -approved
mitigation for removal of bat maternity roost habitat.

MM 3.3 -11 Vegetation removal, clearing/grubbing, and grading activities shall be conducted in a uniform direction to allow mobile animals such as San Joaquin pocket mouse the ability to escape the disturbance area into adjacent undisturbed habitat. Project construction shall also avoid the creation of fragmented islands of habitat where individuals may become trapped, isolated from resources, and at risk from eventual clearing/grading operations.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
During construction
417

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
MM 3.3-12 Each applicant shall ensure that a qualified biologist approved by the City of Pittsburg Community Development Director conduct a preconstruction survey for American badger den sites. The survey shall be conducted no more than four weeks before the commencement of ground disturbance.

If an occupied den is found, and young are not present, then any badgers present shall be removed from the den either by the use of appropriate exclusionary devices or by trapping and relocation.

The removal method shall be approved by CDFW prior to
implementation; if trapping and relocation are used, it shall be carried out by biologist(s) with all required permits for badger handling. Any trapped badgers shall be relocated to other suitable habitat at least 500 feet outside the study area boundary. Once any badgers are excluded or trapped and relocated, den(s) shall be excavated by hand and backfilled to prevent reoccupation.

Exclusion shall continue until the badgers are successfully removed from the site, as determined by the biologist.

Badgers shall not be excluded or relocated if it is determined by the biologist that young are or may be present. Any occupied dens shall be protected with a 50 -foot-wide no -activity buffer. The buffer shall be delineated in the field by a qualified biologist, using temporary construction fencing or another appropriate low - impact medium, and shall remain in place until the biologist has determined that the young are no longer dependent on their mother and the den site. No entry into the buffer area shall be permitted.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
No more than four
weeks before
commencement of
ground disturbance

3.3-2 Have a substantial adverse
effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive
natural community
identified in local or
regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the
California Department of
Implement MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3, as described above. See MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3.

See MM 3.3-1
through MM 3.3-3.

418

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
Fish and Wildlife or U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service

3.3-3 Have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally
protected wetlands
(including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through
direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption,
or other means
Implement MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3, as described above. See MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3.

See MM 3.3-1
through MM 3.3-3.

3.3-4 Interfere substantially with
the movement of any
native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established
native resident or
migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the
use of native wildlife
nursery sites
Implement MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3, as described above. See MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3.

See MM 3.3-1
through MM 3.3-3.

3.3-6 Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved
local, regional, or State
habitat conservation plan
Implement MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3, as described above. See MM 3.3-1 through MM 3.3-3.

See MM 3.3-1
through MM 3.3-3.

3.4 CULTURAL AND TRIBAL RESOURCES

3.4-2 Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to Section
15064.5
MM 3.4-1 Prior to construction, all workers regardless of location, shall receive cultural resource awareness training. The training program should be developed by a Qualified Professional Archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Quali fications Standards for archaeology and shall include relevant information regarding sensitive cultural resources and tribal cultural resources, including applicable regulations, protocols for avoidance, and consequences of City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

Prior to
construction

419

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
violating state laws and regulations. It should also describe appropriate avoidance and impact minimization measures for cultural resources and tribal cultural resources that may be located within the Plan Area and provide guidance on procedures to follow if any cultural resources or TCRs are encountered.

MM 3.4 -2 All ground -disturbing activities proposed within the Plan Area shall be monitored by a Qualified Professional Archaeologist who meets or works under the direct supervision of someone who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology.

All ground -disturbing activities proposed within the Plan Area shall also be monitored by Qualified Native American Monitor. In the event that cultural resources are observed, all work must stop within the immediate vicinity of the find, and the Qualified Professional Archaeologist shall prepare and implement a resource mitigation plan and monitoring program.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

During ground-
disturbing activities

MM 3.4-3 If an inadvertent discovery of tribal cultural resources, archaeological artifacts, other cultural resources, or human remains are discovered during construction within the Plan Area, all work must halt within a 100 -foot radius of the discovery. The Qualified Professional Archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology, shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no -work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. The following notifications and procedures shall apply:
• If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does not represent a cultural resource, work may
resume immediately, and no agency notifications are
required.
• If the Qualified Professional Archaeologist determines that the find does represent a cultural resource from
any time period or cultural affiliation, the Qualified
City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

During construction
420

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
Professional Archaeologist shall immediately evaluate
the find pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
21083.2. If necessary, the evaluation may require
preparation of a treatment plan and archaeological
testing for determining California Register of His torical Resources eligibility. If the discovery proves to be
significant under CEQA and cannot be avoided by the
project, additional work may be warranted, such as data recovery excavation, to mitigate any significant impacts to significant resources. Work may not resume within
the no -work radius until the lead agencies, through
consultation as appropriate, determine that the site
either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA or a Historic Property under Section 106; or 2) that the
treatment measures h ave been completed to their
satisfaction. Any reports required to document and/or
evaluate unanticipated discoveries shall be submitted
to the City of Pittsburg for review and approval and
submitted to the Northwest Information Center in
Sonoma State after completion. Recommendations
contained within prepared reports shall be
implemented throughout the remainder of ground
disturbance activities.
• If the find represents a Native American or potentially Native American resource that does not include human
remains, then the Qualified Professional Archaeologist
shall notify the City of Pittsburg, a Native American
Representative from the Wilton Rancher ia tribe, and
the NAHC shall be contacted to ensure that the Most
Likely Descendant (MLD) can assess the find. The City of Pittsburg shall consult with the tribes on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment
measures, if the find is dete rmined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a)
of the CEQA Guidelines. If the deposit is eligible, the project shall attempt to feasibly avoid damage to the
421

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
deposit (e.g., redesign or capping). If avoidance is not feasible, the archaeologist shall, in consultation with the MLD and City, develop and implement a plan to recover
the scientifically consequential data represented by the deposit in a manner respectful of tribal concerns. Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate,
determine that the site either: 1) is not a Historical
Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a)
of the CEQA Guid elines; or 2) that the treatment
measures have been completed to the agencies
satisfaction. A report of the finds or any resource
evaluation and/or data recovery efforts shall be
submitted to City of Pittsburg for review and approval
and submitted to the N orthwest Information Center in
Sonoma State as a condition for access to its archives. • If the find includes human remains, or remains that are potentially human, the Qualified Professional
Archaeologist shall ensure reasonable protection
measures are taken to protect the discovery from
disturbance (AB 2641). The Qualified Professional
Archaeologist shall notify the City of Pittsburg
Development Services Director, a Native American
Representative from the Wilton Rancheria tribe, and
the Contra Costa County Coroner (per § 7050.5 of the
Health and Safety Code). The provisions of § 7050.5 of
the California Health and Safety Code, § 5097.98 of the California PRC, and AB 2641 will be implemented. If the coroner determines the remains are Native American
origin and not the result of a crime scene, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission
(NAHC), which then will designate a Native American
Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the Project (§
5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD will have 48
hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning tre atment of the
422

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
remains. If the landowner does not agree with the
recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate
(§ 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not
be further disturbed (§ 5097.98 of the PRC). Th is will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open
space or conservation zoning designation or easement;
or recording a reinternment document with the county
in which the property is located (A B 2641). Work may
not resume within the no -work radius until the
agencies, through consultation as appropriate,
determine that the treatment measures have been
completed and are approved by the Development
Services Director.

3.4-3 Lead to the disturbance of
any human remains
Implement MM 3.4-3, as described above. See MM 3.4-3. See MM 3.4-3.

3.4-4 Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code
Section 21074, and that is:

Listed or eligible for listing
in the California Register of
Historical Resources, or in
a local register of historical
resources as defined in
Public Resources Code
Section 5020.1(k), or a
resource determined by
the lead agency
Implement MM 3.4-1 through 3.4-3, as described above. See MM 3.4-1 through 3.4-3.

See MM 3.4-1
through 3.4-3.

3.5 GEOLOGY AND SOILS

3.5-6 Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource
MM 3.5-1 At the time of application for site specific development within the Plan Area, the Applicant shall retain a Project Paleontologist to develop a Paleontological Resources Mitigation City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Prior to issuance of
a grading permit

423

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
or site or unique geologic
feature
and Monitoring Plan. The Plan shall outline preconstruction coordination, monitoring procedures, emergency discovery procedures, sampling and data recovery, museum storage
coordination with an accredited institution or facility for any specimen and data recovered, and final reporting.

Department

MM 3.5 -2 Prior to the start of construction, the Project Paleontologist or a qualified paleontological monitor shall provide all construction personnel involved with earthmoving activities an environmental awareness training that will provide information on the possibility of encountering fossils during construction, how to identify fossils, and the protocols to follow in the case of any fossil discoveries including proper notification procedures.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

Prior to
construction

MM 3.5-3 Prior to construction, the Project Paleontologist shall review excavation plans to determine where paleontologically sensitive stratigraphic units will be disturbed by Project -related earth movement. Earthmoving construction activities will be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor in those areas and/or where disturbance will take place to previously
undisturbed sediment . Monitoring will not take place in areas where the ground has been previously disturbed, in areas underlain by artificial fill, or in areas where exposed sediment will be buried but not disturbed. Monitoring procedures will include measures to suspend monitoring should construction activities be restricted to previously disturbed fill and to adjust monitoring protocols based on updated evaluations of sensitivity subsequent to initial excavations.

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department

Prior to
construction

3.10 NOISE

3.10-1 Generate a substantial
temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise
levels in excess of local
MM 3.10 -1 If at the time of development review, an Applicant cannot provide evidence of project level conformance with Table 3-1, the Applicant shall submit a detailed construction mitigation plan accompanied by a construction noise analysis that
City Engineer Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

424

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
general plan standards or
noise ordinance
incorporates specific mitigation techniques for site -specific noise reduction and attenuation. Examples include limiting hours of construction, locating stationary noise sources (e.g., generators, compressors) away from sensitive receptors, using shrouds o r temporary barriers for louder equipment (e.g., pile drivers), and using newer machinery.

MM 3.10 -2 If at the time of development review, an Applicant cannot provide evidence of project level conformance with Table

3.10-8, the Applicant shall submit a detailed operational mitigation plan accompanied by an operational noise analysis that incorporates specific mitigation techniques for site -specific noise reduction and attenuation. Examples of operational noise mitigation include changes to a site layout to place noise sources further from sensitive receptors, using manufacturer -supplied or third-party noise mitigation (e.g., low -sound fan options, silencers, acoustical louvers), and installing sound barriers.

City Engineer Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

MM 3.10-3 If future development anticipates greater use of truck trips beyond what was analyzed in this PEIR (15 trips per day), then the Applicant shall prepare a subsequent noise analysis to provide evidence that they conform to the noise level thresholds identified in Table 3.10 -8. If the Applicant cannot demonstrate conformance with Table 3.10-8, then the Applicant shall submit a detailed operational mitigation p lan accompanied by an operational noise analysis that incorporates specific mitigation techniques for site-specific noise reduction and attenuation.

City Engineer Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

3.13 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

3.13-1 Specific Plan
implementation would
result in VMT per
employee that is greater
MM 3.13-1 Travel Demand Management Plan(s) shall be prepared and implemented for future phases of Specific Plan
implementation. The TDM Plan comply with the City’s TIA Guidelines in effect at the time of application and should identify trip reduction strategies as well as mechanisms for funding and City Engineer Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

425

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
than 85 percent of
Baseline conditions
overseeing the delivery of trip reduction programs and strategies.

Trip reduction strategies applicable to the proposed project may include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Implement Alternative Work Schedules
b. Provide New Hire Packets on Transportation Options
c. Implement Subsidized or Discounted Transit Program
d. Provide Carpooling Programs
e. Implement Car-Sharing Program
f. Provide a Transit Riders Guide
g. Provide an Online TDM Information Center
h. Implement Commute Trip Reduction Marketing
i. Increase Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities/Amenities j. Free Trial Rides on Transit Services

3.13-2 Specific Plan
implementation would
conflict with a program,
plan, policy, or ordinance
addressing the circulation
system, including transit,
bicycle, and pedestrian
facilities
MM 3.13 -2 As future specific land -uses are proposed for development on the site, a level of service analysis shall be performed in accordance with the City of Pittsburg’s TIA Guidelines in effect at the time of application. If violations of the City’s General Plan LOS policies are identified, improvement measures shall be developed and proposed to eliminate those violations.

City Engineer

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

MM 3.13-3 As future specific land-uses are developed on the site, appropriate local and regional traffic impact fees shall be calculated and paid in accordance with the anticipated level of traffic generation. The two currently applicable traffic impact fees are the Pittsburg Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee (TIMF) and the Pittsburg Regional Transportation Development Impact Fee (PRTDIM), as described in Chapters 15.90 and 15.103 PMC, respectively.

City Engineer

City of Pittsburg
Community
Development
Department
Prior to approval of
subsequent
development
applications

3.15 WILDFIRES

3.15-4 Expose people or
structures to significant
risks, including downslope
or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of
runoff, post-fire slope
MM 3.15-1 Prior to approval of building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that debris flow potential has been studied for post- fire conditions. Alternatives for mitigating potential debris flow impacts shall be considered and refined as each phase of future development is designed. Preliminary mitigation measures may include restricting the use of portions of the site until the potential for debris flow is quantified, using best modeling methods. If it is City Engineer Prior to approval of
building permit

426

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

IMPACT

NUMBER IMPACT MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING
AGENCY

IMPLEMENTATION

SCHEDULE SIGN-OFF
instability, or drainage
changes
determined that there is high potential for debris flow impacts, additional infrastructure or interventions may be required, including constructing debris collection basins, routine removal of debris-generating materials, and sizing up stormwater runoff conveyance facilities for bulked debris flows.

427