RESOLUTION NO. R-2023-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA CONCERNING THE
UPDATE OF THE LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M (M2) PROGRAM.
A. Recitals
WHEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority has developed the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan to identify traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals within and across jurisdictional boundaries, and defines the means of implementing the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program requires that local jurisdictions adopt a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local jurisdictions' efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local jurisdictions' boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Local Signal Synchronization Plan must be updated by June 30, 2023 to continue to be eligible to receive Net Revenues as part of Measure M2; B. Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA DOES HEREBY INFORM OCTA THAT:
a) The City adopts and maintains a Local Signal Synchronization Plan which includes goals that are consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional Signal Synchronization Master Plan, including signal synchronization across jurisdictions.
b) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan identifies traffic signal synchronization street routes, including all elements of the Regional Signal Synchronization Network located within the City.
c) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes the traffic signal inventory for all traffic signal synchronization street routes.
d) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a three-year plan showing capital, operations, and maintenance of signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals. e) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes an update on the status and performance of traffic signal synchronization activities.
Resolution R-2023-46
f) The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a discussion on the review and revision, as may be necessary, on the timing of traffic signals on the traffic signal synchronization street routes.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June 2023.
Ward L. Smith, Mayor
ATTEST:
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
1, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City Of Placentia do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of June 2023 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
Resolution R-2023-46
Mayor
WARD L. SMITH
Mayor Pro Tem
JEREMY B. YAMAGUCHI
Councilmembers:
KEVIN KIRWIN
RHONDA SHADER
CHAD P. WANKE
The People are the City
401 East Chapman Avenue - Placentia, California 92870
June 5, 2023
Orange County Transportation Authority
ATTN: Alicia Yang
Regional Modeling and Traffic Operations
Planning Division
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
City Clerk:
ROBERT S. MCKINNELL
City Treasurer
KEVIN A. LARSON
City Administrator
DAMIEN R. ARRULA
Subject: Local Signal Synchronization Plan Submittal as Part of the Measure M2 Eligibility Process
Dear Ms Yang:
The City of Placentia is pleased to submit its Local Signal Synchronization Plan as part of the Measure M2 eligibility process. The submittal includes the following components:
1. A completed "Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Review Checklist" form establishing consistency between the Local Signal Synchronization Plan and the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
2. An updated Local Signal Synchronization Plan for Fiscal Years 2023/24 to 2025/26 including and all required elements as identified in the "Guidelines for the Preparation of Local Signal Synchronization Plans".
The City looks forward to continuing the implementation of the beneficial programs and construction projects required and made possible by Measure M2.
If you have any questions, please call me at 714-993-8121 Sincerely.
Kyra Tao
Transportation Manager
Enclosures
A. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Consistency Review Checklist B. Local Signal Synchronization Plan
cc: Luis Estevez, Deputy City Administrator
LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW CHECKLIST The Local Agency Name: City of Placentia Plan Date. June 30, 2023 Local agencies must submit a copy of the Local Signal Synchronization Plan, a completed consistency review checklist, and any supporting documentation. Complete the table below.
Local Agency Statement
Signal synchronization goals of the agency are consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan.
2. Traffic signal synchronization street routes are identified, including all corridors along the regional signal
synchronization network located within the local agency.
Traffic signal inventory for all traffic signal synchronization street routes.
Three-year plan separately showing costs, available
funding, and phasing for capital, operations, and
maintenance of signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals which may include unconstrained and build -out scenarios.
Signal synchronization review, revision, and assessment of synchronization activities along the traffic signal
synchronization street routes and traffic signals.
Page #s in
LSSP
Pages:
1-2
Pages:
3-4
Pages:
5-7
Pages:
8-11
Pages:
12-15
I certify that the above statements are true to the best of my knowledge.
Signature
Kyra Tao, Transportation Manager, City of Placentia
Printed Name, Title
Provided or N/A
June 30, 2023
Date
Provided
Provided
Provided
Provided
Provided
CITY OF PLACENTIA
LOCAL SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN
UPDATED JUNE 30, 2023
SECTION ONE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION GOALS, POLICIES AND
OBJECTIVES
MEASURE M2 REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION GOALS. POLICIES
AND OBJECTIVES
The purpose and goal of the City of Placentia's LSSP is to provide a plan to reduce vehicle and pedestrian traffic congestion and delays. Traffic signal synchronization plays a key role to keep busy intersections moving freely and to prevent lower volume minor streets from disrupting major arterials traffic flow. The City's near-term goals are to complete infrastructure improvements for a properly functioning synchronization system. Long-term goals include completion of safety and synchronization improvements along remaining corridor segments.
The City's infrastructure has lived well past its intended lifespan and the City will be budgeting additional funds to address existing traffic signal system maintenance deficiencies. In addition, traffic synchronization projects provide the City opportunities to upgrade outdated traffic signal equipment and ensure an efficient and well-run Traffic Management Center (TMC) at City Hall. Using the TMC, City staff can monitor synchronized corridors from City Hall and remotely modify timing as needed to address traffic needs.
The City of Placentia collaborates closely with its neighbors in Fullerton, Brea, Yorba Linda, and Anaheim to make sure shared arterials are adequately maintained and traffic flows efficiently. The City of Placentia coordinates beyond directly adjacent jurisdictions to partner with cities along major corridors. For example, ongoing Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Project P funded synchronization projects along Chapman Avenue/Malvern Avenue, Orangethorpe Avenue, Tustin/Rose Avenue, and Imperial Highway (State Route 90) include multiple agencies for each project. Additionally, the Yorba Linda Boulevard synchronization project will begin soon.
The City reviews signal timing based on resident or business feedback and during design of Capital Improvement Projects to incorporate planned improvements where possible. The City's Transportation Manager considers the timing changes and implements them as necessary.
The City of Placentia acknowledges the Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program goals and will continue to support a multi -agency, corridor based approach that optimizes traffic signals based on existing traffic patterns. The City supports local agency responsibility for signal timing and working with neighboring agencies to improve corridor operations.
2 SECTION TWO
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION STREET ROUTES (EXISTING
AND PLANNED)
£ommrvewrr—A Are
1 Golden Ave
it
/ r
/
LY
r---
1 ---t
I
rstanclwry_Ild
II
2 1
E,
Sattenchvey R.1.
�/ -- _yarn. tr.sd Olvd.---� 1 F__—i
•
-1-_
r / 1
y 1
/ 1
Art. Vista St
an,<,nar�-•-
+
•
Maim& Are
0 0.7 }0.''5 0. (t 5 t
•
SYNCHRONIZATION
NE'T'WORK MAP
r:
Network Type/Status
Loral City Synehronitation C,rridnrs
( Coord, atcd Roadways)
Local Clly Synchronization Cot ridors
(tuturn r. ndrdinatr.d Roadways)
t)CTA R.alonal Synch+ontratron Corridors
!Cunt el, ;tett Roadways)
OCTA R, gional Synehroniration Coe rider..
(future Doors/Meted Roadway.)
SECTION THREE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL INVENTORY
5 Traffic Signal Inventory — City of Placentia
Cycle Length Ecluipment
Intersection Maintained Bike Power
Corridor Cross -street Responsibility AM MD PM Type Detection Detection CCTV Backup Status Chapman Ave. Melody Placentia 110 110 110 ASC/2 Loops No COHU BBS Online Murray Placentia 110 110 110 ASC/2 Loops No N/A BBS Cnline Melrose Placentia 110 110 110 ASC/2 Loops No N/A BBS Online Bradford Placentia 110 110 110 ASC/2 Video No COHU BBS Online Angelina Placentia NA NA NA ASC/2 Loops No N/A BBS Online Central Placentia 100 100 100 ASC -8000 Loops No N/A RBS Online Oranpethorpe Ave. Placentia Placentia 120 120 120 ASC/3 Video No COHU N/A Online Melrose Placentia 120 120 120 ASC/3 Loops No COHU BBS Online Crowther/Miller Placentia 120 120 120 2070/NEMA Video I No N/A I N/A I Online Chapman Placentia 120 I 120 120 ASC/3 I Video No COHU I BBS Online Traub Placentia 120 I 120 120 ASC/3 Video No N/A N/A Online Del Cerro Placentia 120 li 120 120 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online Jefferson Placentia 120 I 120 120 ASC/3 Video No COHU BBS Online Van Buren Placentia 12C I 120 120 ASC/2 Video No N/A BBS Online Richfield Placentia 120 � 120 120 ASC/3 Video � No COHU BBS Online Highland Placentia 120 I 120 120 ASC/3 Loops 1 No N/A N/A 1 Online Placentia Ave.Lewis Placentia 55 � 50 55 ASC/3 Loops I No N/A N/A 1 Online St. Johns Placentia 55 50 55 ASC/3 Loops Na N/A I N/A Online Palm Placentia 55 50 55 A.SC/3 Loops Na N/A N/A Online
Fender Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Loops No N/A BBS Online Crowther Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Loops No N/A N/A Online Kimberly Placentia 100 44 N/A ASC l3 Loops No N/A N/A Online La Jolla/Burton Placentia N/A N/A N/A Cobalt Loops No N/A N/A Online Kraemer Blvd. Golden Placentia N/A N/A N/A Cobalt Video 1 No COHU BBS Online Patrician Placentia 110 110 110 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online Morse/Sheffield Placentia 100 100 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online Madison Placentia 130 100 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A2,85 Online Alta Vista Placentia 100 100 100 ASC/3 Loops No COHU BBS Online Chapman Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Video No COHU BBS Online Hawaii Placentia 120 120 120 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Cnline Crowther Placentia 12C 120 120 ASC/3 Video No N/A N/A Online Orangethorpe Anaheim 120 120 120 ASC/2 Video No 1 COHU N/A Online 6 Traffic Signal Inventory — City of Placentia, continued Cycle Length
Corridor
Rose Dr.
Yorba Linda Blvd.
Bastanchury RcI.
Alta Vista Street
Bradford Avenue
Melrose Street
Richfield Road
Valencia Avenue
Intersection
Cross -street
Linda V sta
Palm
Buena Vista
Alta Vista
Castner
Del Cerro
Bradford
Kraemer
Palm
Valencia
McCormack
Linda Vista
Rose
Jefferson/Prospect
Placentia
Tuffree
Kraemer
Brookhaven
Valencia
McCormack
Central/Sue
Dunnavant
Jefferson
Van Buren
Madison
Crowther
La Jolla
Orchard
Miraloma
Golden
Shady
Equipment
Maintained Bike Power
Responsibility AM MD PM Type Detection Detection CCTV Backup Status Placentia 100 100 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 100 100 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 100 100 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 100 100 100 ASC/3 Video No NIA BBS Online
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A N/A Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Video No COHU BBS Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Loops No N/A N/A Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Loops No N/A N/A Online
Placentia 100 90 100 Cobalt Loops No N/A N/A Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Video No COHU BBS Online
Placentia 100 90 100 ASC/3 Loops No N/A N/A Online
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Loops No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 110 50 110 ASC/3 Loops No N/A N/A Online
Placentia 110 100 110 ASC/3 Video No COHU BBS Online
Placentia 110 100 110 ASC/3 Loops No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 110 100 110 ASC/3 Video No N/A BBS Online
Placentia 110 50 110 ASC/3 Video No N/A N/A Online
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/8000 Loops No BBS Offline
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/2 Video No N/A Offline
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/8000 Loops No N/A Offline
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/8000 Loops No N/A Offline
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/3 Video No N/A I Offline
Placentia N/A N/A N/A ASC/2 Loops No N/A Offline
Placentia N/A N/A N/A Cobalt Video 1 No BBS 1 Offline
Placentia N/A 1 N/A N/A ASC/3 1 Video No 1 N/A Offline
Placentia N/A 1 N/A N/A ASC/3 1 Video 1 No 1 N/A 1 Offline Placentia N/A 1 N/A N/A ASC/3 1 Video 1 No 1 BBs Offline Placentia N/A 1 N/A N/A ASC,/8000 1 Loops 1 No 1 N•.A Offline 7 SECTION FOUR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION SYSTEM AND
THREE-YEAR PLAN
8 3 -YEAR OUTLOOK
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Constrained)
Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: City of Placentia
Type of Traffic Signal Synchronization Expenditures in Year of Expenditure Dollars (Note that sample expenditure categories are included - modify as necessary.)
MAINTENANCE
PROJECT FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 TOTAL
Traffic Signal Infrastructure Maintenance $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $450,000 Communication Infrastructure Maintenance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $30,000 Subtotal Maintenance $160,000 $160,000 $160,000 $480,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 TOTAL
Malvern/Chapman TSSP $45,368 $45,368
Imperial Hwy TSSP $25,000 $25,000
Rose/Tustin TSSP $103,000 $103,000
Orangethorpe TSSP $34,172 $34,172
Subtotal Construction $207,540 $207,540
OPERATIONS
PROJECT FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 TOTAL
Timing Development & Fine-tuning $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $30,000 Monitoring / Review $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $15,000
Subtotal Operations $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $45,000
$382,540 $175,000 $175,000 $732,540
9 3 -YEAR OUTLOOK
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION
Funding Needs for Synchronized Operation (Unconstrained) Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: Citv of Placentia
Type of Traffic Signal Synchronization Expenditures in Year of Expenditure Dollars (Note that sample expenditure categories are included - modify as necessary.)
MAINTENANCE
PROJECT FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 TOTAL
Traffic Signal Infrastructure Maintenance $170,000 $170,000 $170,000 $510,000 Communication Infrastructure Maintenance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $30,000 Subtotal Maintenance $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $540,000
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 TOTAL
Rose/Tustin TSSP $103,000 $50,000 $153,000
Yorba Linda/Weird Canyon TSSP (see next
page) $150,000 $150,000
Orangethorpe TSSP $34,172 $34,172
Kraemer Boulevard (see next page) $100,000 $400,000 $385,000 $885,000 TMC upgrades (see next page) $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $90,000 Subtotal Construction $337,540 $480,000 $565,000 $1,382,540
OPERATIONS
PROJECT FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 TOTAL
Timing Development & Fine-tuning $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $60,000 Monitoring / Review $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $30,000
Subtotal Operations $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $90,000
$547,540 $690,000 $775,000 $2,012,540
10 LSSP IMPLEMENTATION - CANDIDATE SIGNAL
SYNCHORNIZATION PROJECTS WITH ESTIMATED COSTS
Reporting Jurisdiction Expenditures: Citv of Placentia
CORRIDOR
Yorba Linda
Boulevard
Kraemer Boulevard
Traffic Management
Center Upgrades
IMPROVEMENT SUMMARY
Upgrade timing and replace controllers,
cabinets, detection, install CCTV
cameras, fiber optic lines connected to
City's traffic Management Center
Upgrade timing and replace controllers,
cabinets, detection, and install CCTV
cameras
Centracs Annual Maintenance &
Upgrades
ESTIMATED
COST
$150,000
$885,000
$90,000
Total Estimated Cost $1,125,000
11 SECTION FIVE
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION ASSESSMENT
REVIEW AND REVISE, AS MAY BE NECESSARY, THE
TIMING OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS
Significant timing plan updates and projects completed FY 2020/2021 through 2022/2023
(Note: Do not include periodic refinements performed
as part of routine monthly reviews)
12 MEASURE M2 REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PERFORMANCE
The City of Placentia's Traffic Signal Synchronization Program has enabled the City to upgrade aging signal infrastructure that otherwise is difficult to fund locally. Participation in regional efforts has been a great benefit to the City of Placentia as synchronization projects have improved traffic circulation and reduced congestion while allowing the City to replace and upgrade outdated and malfunctioning traffic signal system equipment.
Using the TMC, City staff can monitor synchronized corridors from City Hall and remotely modify timing as needed to address traffic needs. The efficiency of timely modifications improves traffic flow and service to the community. The traffic signal synchronization program and recently completed synchronization projects have improved traffic flow throughout the City. Upon completion of the OC Bridges grade separation projects, traffic patterns and flows have stabilized for ongoing evaluation and refinement by the City.
The City's approach to updating timing plans is to review traffic patterns on an annual basis. In combination with citizen comments and/or complaints, the City's Traffic Engineer also reviews timing charts and traffic patterns. The City's Traffic Engineer consults with the City's traffic signal maintenance contractor and decides if traffic timing should be adjusted. Additionally, the City's Traffic Engineer reviews potential for timing changes as part of and following completion of City Capital Improvement Projects.
Since 2011, OCTA has prepared a biannual Corridor Operational Performance Report (COPR) to conduct an evaluation of the corridor operational performance for 770 miles or arterials in the Orange County Synchronization Network. The most recently available COPR is dated 2021, and OCTA has provided a map showing the results of the performance evaluation that is specific to the City of Placentia.
13 •
•
i• oil 0 - •
COMMONWEAL]
VALtAa:. A
CAL TATE
9.;,..LERTCW
NJIvuoup.:,
Z147.111AW24 MALI
Aspow,..
COo.dt
Ci0._]JEN
r.
0 1
7 PLACENTIA
AL iA kits
L,!
OCTAI
bAaiANC.MUfty
'3
rr
YOFeA L!NDA
suKdA uhuA VOW MCA
AAA eq
LtAViP..
Lai
kikA LCLAA
Corridor Synchronization
Performance Index
Tier V Less than 50
Tier lv 5010 60
Tier III 60.01 to 70
Tier II 70.01 to 80
Ter I More than 80
EligibIe Corridor
Currently Funded Conidor
3c 0 CTA: Data current as of Septerrber 2022.
Please OCTA prior lc CTFP CatI fa- Pra.ects
'
EI;bar_: ^g non cc sipletion pier DTFP Gs -felines «
0 0.t.
A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION ASSESSMENT, REVIEW, AND REVISION
LOCAL AGENCY TIMING DID TIMING
CORRIDOR REVIEWED REQUIRE
(Past 3 Years) AN UPDATE?
TIMING UPDATE RESULTS (if available)
Speed Travel
Before I After
Stops per mile
Before I After
Greens per red CSPI Score*
Before I After Before I After
Chapman Avenue Yes Yes Studies not yet available
Orangethorpe Avenue Yes Yes Studies not yet available
Tustin/Rose Avenue Yes Yes Studies not yet available
Yorba Linda Boulevard Yes Yes Studies not yet available, project is about to begin 14 PROJECT CORRIDOR
Kraemer Boulevard
Rose Drive
Bastanchury Road
Yorba Linda Boulevard
Chapman Avenue
Orangethorpe Avenue
Placentia Avenue
SIGNAL TIMING REVISIONS
CROSS STREET CYCLE LENGTH (Before/After)
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed.
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed.
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed.
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed.
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed.
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed.
Periodic Reviews conducted. No significant changes needed. 15