Agenda Item No: 3.a
PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: January 14, 2025
Submitted by: Kyra Tao
From: Public Works
Subject:
Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint Active Transportation Plan Adoption Financial Impact:
Fiscal Impact:
The adoption of the resolution has no fiscal impact. The adoption of the Plan will assist the City in remaining competitive for future grant opportunities.
Summary:
The Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan (ATP) is a collaborative effort between the City of Yorba Linda, the City of Placentia, and the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District to create a community-supported, implementable plan that enhances safety and connectivity within communities in both cities. The plan was made possible by a grant awarded to both cities from Caltrans. The plan has been developed following extensive community engagement, data analysis, and coordination with key stakeholders. The goal of this plan is to enhance public health, reduce environmental impacts, improve mobility, and provide safe and accessible transportation options for all residents. On October 21, 2024, the Streetscape and Transportation Advisory Commission (STAC) reviewed and recommended to the City Council approval of the Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint ATP. The ATP will serve as a blueprint for future transportation projects and policy decisions. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Resolution, approving and adopting the Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint ATP.
Recommendation:
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:
Approve Resolution R-2025-03, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California, approving and adopting the Yorba Linda and Placentia Joint Active Transportation Plan
Strategic Plan Statement:
This item conforms to Strategic Plan Goal 5: Implement Public Infrastructure to Meet Community Needs and Objective 5.3, Examine more multi-modal transportation options.
Discussion:
The City of Yorba Linda as lead agency, in conjunction with the City of Placentia (City) and the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (PYLUSD) collaborated to develop a project that is eligible for the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (STPG). The multi- 1 agency group developed a proposal for a comprehensive Active Transportation Plan (ATP) that incorporates identified bicycle and pedestrian improvements, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) and multi-use trail plans. The Multi-Agency ATP Project was selected to receive the Caltrans STPG funds in April of 2021. Subsequently, on June 20, 2023, the City Council of Yorba Linda awarded a professional service agreement to Alta Planning + Design, Inc. (Alta), for the design of the Yorba Linda – Placentia Multi-Agency ATP Project. The budget for the project is $406,427, of which a total of $359,809 is funded by Caltrans. There is a project funding match for a total of $46,618. The City agrees to provide 50% of the local matching funds in an amount of $23,309.
Development of the ATP is a collaborative effort between the two cities to create a community supported, implementable plan that will bring safety and connectivity to communities in Yorba Linda and Placentia. The ATP reflects the unique challenges and opportunities in the cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia and addresses active transportation mobility gaps that negatively impact access to neighborhood schools, parks, hospitals, retail centers, and regional and local transit options. The ATP is organized into seven chapters:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Existing Condition
Chapter 3: Needs Analysis
Chapter 4: Public Outreach and Engagement
Chapter 5: Recommendation
Chapter 6: Implementation
Chapter 7: Appendices
The ATP is the result of:
Data Collection and Analysis: Evaluation of existing infrastructure, traffic patterns, and safety issues for pedestrians and cyclists.
Public Engagement: Workshops, surveys, and focus groups involving local residents, advocacy groups, and transportation experts.
Alignment with City Goals: The ATP aligns with Placentia’s broader transportation and sustainability goals, including maintaining a safe transportation system, encouraging active transportation modes, and fostering an inclusive, healthy community.
Outreach events provide an opportunity for community members who may not typically be engaged in the planning process to provide their feedback and suggestions. The project team hosted four pop-up events, one virtual town hall, one virtual workshop, two in-person community meetings, one parent-teacher association (PTA) Council presentation and walk audits at 28 project schools in the PYLUSD. Over 300 people participated in the development of the ATP through the public outreach process. More details are included in the Chapter 4 and Appendix C of the ATP.
Staff received the first working draft of the ATP from Alta in August 2024. Staff meetings were held in September and October 2024 to provide comments to Alta. on October 7, 2024, the Draft Plan was posted on the project website for public review and comment through November 5 2024. The draft ATP was also presented to the Streetscape and Transportation Advisory Committee (STAC) on October 21, 2024. The STAC reviewed, provided their comments, and recommended to the City Council approval of the Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint Active Transportation Plan once the report is revised and finalized based on the public comments.
2 Adopting the Active Transportation Plan will enhance the City’s transportation network, reduce environmental impacts, improve public health, and provide equitable transportation options for all residents. Staff recommends the City Council approve the Resolution, approving and adopting the Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint ATP, and looks forward to moving forward with the implementation of this vital plan.
Fiscal Impact Summary:
The adoption of the resolution has no fiscal impact. The adoption of the Plan will assist the City in remaining competitive for future grant opportunities.
Attachments
Attachment 1 - Draft Resolution No. 2025-03 - Placentia.docx Attachment 2 - Yorba Linda-Placentia_ATP Report_Final Draft.pdf Item No. 3.a. Joint ATP Placentia City Council PPT-Rev.pptx 3 Resolution R-2025-03
RESOLUTION NO. R-2025-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLACENTIA AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION AND
SUBMITTAL OF THE YORBA LINDA-PLACENTIA JOINT
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
A.Recitals
(i)WHEREAS, the City of Yorba Linda as lead agency, in conjunction with the City of Placentia (Placentia) and the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (PYLUSD) collaborated to develop a proposal for a comprehensive Active Transportation Plan (ATP) that incorporates identified bicycle and pedestrian improvements, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) and multi-use trail plans, which was eligible for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants (STPG). (ii)WHEREAS, Caltrans selected the multi-agency ATP project to receive the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grants (STPG) in April of 2021.
(iii)WHEREAS, the Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint Active Transportation Plan provides infrastructure and program recommendations for corridors and safe routes to schools in the Cities of Placentia and Yorba Linda. (iv)WHEREAS, having an adopted Active Transportation Plan is an important component for municipal agencies in California to compete for statewide and regional funds, including grant fund available through the Active Transportation Program, Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program and the California Natural Resources Agency Urban Green Program, amongst other federal and state funding opportunities.
(v)WHEREAS, adoption of the Yorba Linda-Placentia Joint Active Transportation Plan will enable City of Placentia staff to pursue grant funding to implement transportation improvements, advancing community- driven initiatives in the community feedback received throughout the development of the Plan.
B.Resolution
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. In all respects as set forth' in the Recitals, Part A., above. 4 Resolution R-2025-03
2. Adoption. The City Council of the City of Placentia adopts the Yorba Linda- Placentia Joint Active Transportation Plan.
3. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution, and the City Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof.
PASSED,APPROVED and ADOPTED this 14th day of January 2025. ___________________________
Kevin Kirwin, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
5 December
2 0
2 4
Final
6 Acknowledgments
Technical Advisory Committee
Members
ºMegan Beard, Safe Routes to School Coordinator
ºSamantha Bigonger, Yorba Linda Sunrise Rotary
ºRaymond Brower, Canyon Velo Cycling Club
ºTurgut Cakiraga, Rotary Club of Placentia
ºDeeDee Friedrich, Yorba Linda Country Riders
ºFrank Garza, Placentia Traffic Sergeant
ºThomas Ingalls, Placentia Planning Commission and Placentia Streetscape and Transportation Advisory Commission
ºRichard Jimenez, Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District ºAnthony Johnson, Yorba Linda Traffic Commission
ºBrendan Latimer, Caltrans District 12
ºThuy Loung, Placentia Yorba Linda Unified Council of PTAs/ PTSAs
ºRobert McKinnell, Placentia Senior Center
ºRachel McLure, Yorba Linda Parks and Recreation Commission ºTricia Montelongo, Placentia Parks and Recreation Commission ºAlyssa Murakami, Caltrans District 12
California Department of Transportation
The Caltrans Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant program provided funding for this project.
City of Yorba Linda Staff
ºJamie Lai, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
ºColleen Callahan, Economic Development Manager
ºTony Wang, Traffic Engineering Manager
City of Placentia Staff
ºKyra Tao, Transportation Manager
Placentia-Yorba Linda
Unified School District
ºRichard Jimenez, Director of Transportation
7 Consultants ºJuan Navarro, Placentia Planning Commission ºRachel Om, SCAG
ºVernoica Ortiz, Placentia Park Arts and Recreation Commission ºZach Paul, Caltrans District 12
ºRobert Pease II, Yorba Linda Planning Commission
ºNick Polichetti, Placentia Streetscape and Transportation Advisory Commission
ºPaul Pongetti, Placentia Resident and Avid Bike Rider
ºMike Rothans, Yorba Linda Traffic Commission
ºRichard Savitt, Canyon Velo Cycling Club
ºMichele Severson, Placentia Chamber of Commerce
ºKelly Soemantoro, Orange County Health Care Agency
ºPeter Sotherland, OCTA
ºZully Villegas, OCTA
ºSusan Wan-Ross, Yorba Linda Chamber of Commerce
ºDeAnne Wigginton, Yorba Linda Police Services
8 01 Introduction 7
Purpose of the Plan 8
Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Performance Measures 10 Previous Plan and Policy Review 12
02 Existing Conditions 15
Introduction 16
Roadway Network 16
Public Transportation 17
Existing Infrastructure and Facilities 20
Pedestrian Priority Zones 29
Key Destinations 33
03 Needs Analysis 39
Introduction 40
Commute Trend 40
Equity Analysis 42
Collision Analysis 46
Suitability Analysis 57
04 Public Outreach and Engagement 61
Introduction 62
Outreach Methods 63
Outreach Events 65
05 Recommendations 71
Introduction 72
Recommendations Process/Methodology 73
Yorba Linda | Safe Routes to School Recommendations 87
Placentia | Safe Routes to School Recommendations 115
Non-Infrastructure Program Recommendations 144
Table of Contents
9 06 Implementation 151
Introduction 152
Planning Level Cost Estimates 153
Prioritization 155
Maintenance 160
07 Appendices 169
Appendix A: Previous Plan and Policy Review 170
Appendix B: Suitability Analysis 185
Appendix C: Public Outreach Summary 188
Appendix D: Safety Analysis 221
Appendix E: Recommendations List 232
Appendix F: Concept Schematics 245
Appendix G: School Zone Traffic Control
Devices Assessment Checklist 255
Appendix H: Crash Locations Assessment 256
10 11
Introduction 01
12 Introduction Yorba Linda-Placentia8
This Plan analyzes existing conditions in
both Yorba Linda and Placentia that present
community-wide challenges, and it builds
on previous planning efforts to address
these challenges. Public and stakeholder
input is used to understand existing and
future transportation network needs, and
active transportation improvements are
recommended to create healthier and more
vibrant communities. In addition to network
bicycle recommendations, and pedestrian
recommendations in priority areas, this Plan
also evaluates all public schools in Yorba Linda
and Placentia and recommends infrastructure
and programming to improve Safe Routes to
School. Recommended improvements are
prioritized to enable swift implementation to
achieve citywide connectivity with pedestrian
and bicycle facilities.
The Plan allows for modifications and updates
as needed following adoption to address
evolving needs, opportunities, and challenges.
An addendum to the Plan may be incorporated
as warranted to ensure continued relevance
and responsiveness to the communities’
transportation goals.
Purpose of the Plan
The Yorba Linda-Placentia Active
Transportation Plan (Plan) is a collaborative
effort between the City of Yorba Linda, the City
of Placentia, and the Placentia-Yorba Linda
Unified School District to create a community-
supported, implementable plan that will bring
safety and connectivity to communities in
Yorba Linda and Placentia. The Plan reflects
the unique challenges and opportunities in
the cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia and
addresses active transportation mobility gaps
that negatively impact access to neighborhood
schools, parks, hospitals, retail centers, and
regional and local transit options.
13 Introduction Active Transportation Plan 9
Purpose of the Plan
The two cities include integral components
of the greater Orange County active
transportation network, each offering unique
opportunities and challenges for enhancing
connectivity and mobility. Yorba Linda,
characterized by expansive residential
neighborhoods and scenic recreation
destinations, presents an opportunity to
develop safe and accessible walking and
biking paths linking residents to the city’s
expansive trail network, parks, and local
destinations. With its historic downtown
and more compact urban form, Placentia
presents opportunities to prioritize pedestrian-
friendly streetscapes and bike infrastructure
that cater to residents and visitors alike. By
integrating innovative active transportation
recommendations and community
engagement strategies, this Plan aims to
enhance the quality of life in both cities,
fostering healthier lifestyles and strengthening
community ties through enhanced accessibility
and connectivity.
Study Area
Yorba Linda and Placentia are separate but
neighboring cities in northern Orange County,
CA. The cities are bordered by Brea to the
northwest, Fullerton to the west, Anaheim
to the south, and Chino Hills State Park to
the east and northeast. California State
Route 57 (Orange Freeway) runs along the
western border of both cities and State Route
91 runs along Placentia’s southern border.
Additionally, Imperial Highway (State Route
90) passes through both Yorba Linda and
Placentia at-grade and the two-lane State
Route 142 (Carbon Canyon Road) connects
northern Yorba Linda to Chino Hills in San
Bernardino County. While both cities are
characterized by low- and medium-density
residential communities, Placentia contains
a concentration of industrial and office land
use along its southern end while Yorba Linda
features ample open space.
This Plan includes active transportation
recommendations for both Yorba Linda and
Placentia. These recommendations work to
complement existing and proposed active
transportation facilities in both cities.
The Plan also includes an update to the City
of Yorba Linda’s Master Plan for Riding,
Hiking, and Bikeway Trails (Trails Plan). The
Trails Plan inventories earthen and paved
trails in Yorba Linda that can be used by
pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians.
The Trails Plan update recommends
additional trails that complement the active
transportation recommendations in this Plan.
The Trails Plan is included as Volume II of the
Yorba Linda-Placentia Multi-Agency Active
Transportation Plan.
14 Introduction Yorba Linda-Placentia10
Goals, Objectives, Policies,
and Performance Measures
This collaborative effort between the City of
Yorba Linda, the City of Placentia, and the
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District
is needed to connect and create infrastructure
for safe, comfortable mobility for all community
members, including improvements to the multi-
use trail network for exercise and recreation.
The Plan provides clear and actionable
strategies to promote people walking, biking,
and rolling as a part of healthy lifestyles;
reduce collisions involving those vulnerable
road users; and decrease transportation-
related pollution. The Plan recommends
infrastructure projects and non-infrastructure
programs that reflect national best practices,
rigorous data analysis, and extensive
stakeholder engagement.
Safety
Comfort
Connectivity
Equity
Health
Progress
This Plan addresses the following goals:
15 Introduction Active Transportation Plan 11
Goals, Objectives, Policies,
and Performance Measures
This is a living document, and while these measurements will not capture the full picture, they will help the Cities understand to what extent they are meeting their goal of progress.
1 6
2 7
3 8
4 9
5 10
11 12
13 To meet these broad goals, this Plan helps these Cities achieve the following objectives:
Provide safe sidewalks and
intersections for people walking
and rolling
Strengthen social equity by
prioritizing infrastructure in
disadvantaged communities
Provide safe bikeways and
intersections for people biking
and rolling
Identify infrastructure and
programmatic barriers to walking
and biking
Provide a broad spectrum of
projects to benefit the many
types of active transportation
users
Connect trails and pathways
within and between Yorba Linda
and Placentia
Ensure that disadvantaged
communities fully share in
program benefits
Promote active travel as a way to
improve health
Reduce greenhouse gas and
particulate emissions from
vehicle travel by increasing use
of sidewalks, bikeways, and trails
Identify evaluation metrics
Integrate plans for active
transportation, safe routes to
schools, and trails
Prioritize infrastructure and
programs using community
needs and best practices
Provide Safe Routes to School
for K-12 students and their
caregivers
16 Introduction Yorba Linda-Placentia12
Plan/Study Agency/Organization Year
Completed
Connect SoCal–The 2024 Regional Transportation Plan/
Sustainable Communities Strategy
SCAG 2024
Yorba Linda ADA Accessibility Plan City of Yorba Linda 2023 Caltrans Active Transportation Plan for District 12 Caltrans 2022 Orange County Bikeways Map OCTA 2022
Yorba Linda General Plan: Housing Element Update City of Yorba Linda Adopted 2022; Amended 2023
Yorba Linda Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP)City of Yorba Linda 2022 Orange County Safe Routes to School Action Plan OCTA, Orange County Health Care Agency
(OCHCA)
2021
Placentia General Plan: Land Use; Mobility Element; Health, Wellness, and Environmental Justice; Open Space and Recreation City of Placentia 2019
Toward an Active California - State Bicycle + Pedestrian Plan Caltrans 2017 Yorba Linda General Plan: Circulation Element City of Yorba Linda 2016 Yorba Linda Parks and Recreation Master Plan City of Yorba Linda 2014 Yorba Linda General Plan: Riding, Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Component
City of Yorba Linda 2005
OC Active Website OCTA Ongoing
Table 1. Previous Plan and Policy Review Documents
Previous Plan and Policy Review
A comprehensive review of previous
local, regional, and state plans and policy
documents pertinent to Complete Streets,
mobility, and sustainability was completed to
ensure consistency between these previous
plans and this Plan. This review helps to
identify completed local and regional plans
and studies to leverage related goals, policies,
and project recommendations, and to identify
and fill in gaps as needed. A summary of
each City’s General Plan Circulation/Mobility
Element is provided on the following pages.
These are key documents that were used in
the development of this Plan to understand the
existing transportation network in each city,
and each city’s vision for the future.
Table 1 lists all the documents studied in this
review. A summary of each reviewed document
can be found in Appendix A: Previous Plan
and Policy Review.
17 Introduction Active Transportation Plan 13
Previous Plan and Policy Review
Yorba Linda General Plan
(2016)
Circulation Element
The Circulation Element of the Yorba Linda
General Plan provides a framework that
promotes the safe, efficient, and reliable
movement of people and goods throughout the
community. The chapter defines the goals and
policies that will enhance the development and
maintenance of the transportation system and
maximize the freedom of vehicular movement
and pedestrian movement in the community.
Open Space and Recreation Element
The Open Space and Recreation Element
provides policies and programs to enhance
the overall quality of life in Yorba Linda and
direct the management and protection of open
space land in the City. The Open Space and
Recreation Element provides guidance for the
acquisition, maintenance, and development
of parks, trails, and recreational facilities and
programs throughout the City.
Placentia General Plan
(2019)
Mobility Element
The Mobility Element represents Placentia’s
overall transportation plan. The transportation
plan includes both the physical transportation
system itself such as streets, highways,
rail lines, bicycle routes, and sidewalks, as
well as the various modes of transportation
such as cars, buses, trucks, trains, bicycles,
ridesharing, on-demand service, and
pedestrians using these facilities. In addition to
the traditional vehicular transportation planning
needs of the General Plan, the Mobility Element
also addresses interconnected transit and
active transportation modes (pedestrians,
bikeshare programs, and bicycles) that support
the City’s commitment toward advancing
transportation innovation as well as long-term
sustainability as outlined in SB 375.
18 19
Existing
Conditions02
20 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia16
Introduction
This chapter aims to identify and evaluate
existing infrastructure conditions in Yorba Linda
and Placentia, including bicycle, pedestrian,
public transportation, and road networks.
This chapter also identifies and describes key
destinations that can complement
and benefit from an expanded active
transportation network.
A comprehensive understanding of existing
conditions is necessary to develop a Plan
that will ultimately improve multimodal
transportation options. The findings of this
assessment directly informed subsequent
recommendations in this Plan.
Roadway Network
Some roads in the cities, such as Imperial
Highway (State Route 90) and Yorba Linda
Boulevard, are considered truck routes,
consisting of roadways that larger semi-trucks
are required to use. These arterial roads with
high traffic volumes and speed should have
their own corridor studies. Where feasible,
separated facilities, such as Class I shared-
use path or Class IV separated bikeways were
recommended on these routes or alternative
routes were identified. The following lists show
truck routes that run through both cities:
Yorba Linda
ºState Route 91
ºImperial Highway (State Route 90)
Placentia
ºCrowther Avenue
ºMelrose Street
ºOrangethorpe Avenue
ºPlacentia Avenue
ºRose Drive
ºState Route 57 (Orange Freeway)
ºImperial Highway (State Route 90))
ºYorba Linda Boulevard
The Plan’s recommendations primarily focus
on the City-maintained roadway network, as
these are the roads over which the Cities have
exclusive jurisdiction and the ability to improve.
This network interconnects with state highways
and private roads, which the Cities do not
control but which are essential for most travel.
The links between these roadway systems
are crucial for enabling local, regional, and
interstate travel. These roads offer access
to local and regional destinations, including
employment areas, shopping centers,
schools, recreational areas, and residential
communities. The interconnected nature of the
roadway system necessitates collaboration
with other agencies to develop a comfortable
active transportation network for all residents,
workers, and visitors.
21 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 17
Roadway Network Public Transportation
Metrolink and Amtrak
Yorba Linda and Placentia are also served by
the Metrolink commuter rail service. Nearby
stations include the Anaheim Canyon Station
and the Fullerton Station. Additionally, a
Metrolink station is currently under construction
at Melrose Avenue and Crowther Avenue in the
City of Placentia.
The Anaheim Canyon Station is served by the
91/Perris Valley Line and the Inland Empire-
Orange County Line. The Fullerton Station is
served by the 91/Perris Valley Line and the
Orange County Line. Amtrak Pacific Surfliner
service is also provided at the Fullerton Station.
Together, these lines connect riders to stations
across Southern California. Additionally, up
to three bikes can be brought onto regular
Metrolink train cars, and all trains include a
bike car that accommodates up to nine more.
Orange County
Transportation Authority
The Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA) provides public transportation services
to Yorba Linda and Placentia. Yorba Linda is
served solely by OCTA’s 26 Local Bus Route,
which takes riders from the center of Yorba
Linda to the Fullerton Park-and-Ride. Placentia
is served by four Local Bus Routes, including
the 26, 30, 38, and 71, and two Community
Bus Routes, the 123 and the 129. These
routes similarly connect riders to the greater
Orange County area, including nearby public
transportation hubs such as the Goldenwest
Transportation Center, and the Anaheim
Canyon and Buena Park Metrolink Stations.
22 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia18
Figure 1. Yorba Linda and Placentia Existing Transit Facilities 23 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 19 24
Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia20
Existing Infrastructure and Facilities
A bicyclist cycling along the El Cajon Trail, a Class
I Shared-Use Path in Yorba Linda
A Class II Bike Lane near Mabel M. Paine
Elementary School
CLASS II BIKE LANE
Class II bike lanes are dedicated bicycle
space on a facility shared with vehicles.
Most commonly, these are marked bicycle
lanes or paved shoulders and are wide enough
that vehicles can pass cyclists without leaving
their lanes.
CLASS I SHARED-USE PATH
Class I bikeways are facilities that are
fully separated from automobile traffic.
These are generally off-street trails and are
often shared with pedestrians and sometimes
equestrian users.
Existing and previously planned bicycle and
pedestrian facilities provide a base for future
recommendations in this Plan.
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Existing cycle facilities contribute to the ability
of residents of Yorba Linda and Placentia to
bike to their destination.
Bikeways in Yorba Linda and Placentia can be
categorized into four classes:
25 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 21
A Class III Bike Route along Bastanchury Road in
Yorba Linda.
A Class IV Separated Bikeway along Esperanza
Road in Yorba Linda.
CLASS III BIKE ROUTE
Class III bike routes are roadways where
bicycles and vehicles share the same lane.
These are generally indicated with signage
to “share the road” or by painted sharrows.
Bicycles are granted full right of access
to the street and are considered part of
general traffic.
CLASS IV SEPARATED BIKEWAYS
An on-street bikeway that is separated
from traffic by a vertical barrier, such as a
curb, median, or bollards. Also called a “cycle
track” or “protected bikeway.” May be one- or
two-way.
26 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia22
Many of the existing Class II bike lanes are
along main arterials such as Bastanchury
Road, Fairmont Boulevard, and Village Center
Drive. However, due to these arterials’ size,
the existing Class II bike lanes may not feel
comfortable for most potential cyclists. Many
of the existing lanes in Placentia are short
segments of streets with no connectivity.
Although the bikeways adhere to the current
Caltrans design standards for widths and lane
configurations, improvements can be made
to enhance traffic safety and encourage more
people to bike in Yorba Linda and Placentia.
The Santa Ana River Trail runs along the
southern border of Yorba Linda and is the only
Class I in either city. The trail will eventually
be a 110-mile multi-use path spanning from
San Bernardino to Huntington Beach. The trail
currently consists of two sections and spans
about 60 miles. In Yorba Linda, riders can use
the trail approximately 6 miles east to Corona,
and 27 miles west to Huntington Beach. Users
can access dining, shopping, and recreation
areas along the trail, and connect to the
Huntington Beach Bicycle Trail.
A 0.85 mile section of Class IV separated
bikeway, with approximately 600’ in Yorba
Linda, was recently constructed along the
southern border of Yorba Linda via Esperanza
Road and Fairmont Connector. This bikeway
was constructed as part of the OC Loop,
a vision for 66 miles of seamless path
connections throughout Orange County.
The El Cajon Trail is a Class I shared-use
path from the northwest corner of Yorba Linda
to the southeast and is a part of the OC Loop.
There is a gap approximately 0.75 miles
along on-street connections, in the El Cajon
Trail between Grand View Avenue and Arroyo
Cajon Drive.
In addition to the bikeway classes listed above,
Yorba Linda has paved multipurpose trails that
can also be used by bicyclists. However, due
to width constraints, these paved multipurpose
trails do not meet the Caltrans standards for a
Class I shared-use path. To learn more about
paved multipurpose trails, see the Volume II
document, the Updated Yorba Linda Riding,
Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Element.
There are over 56 miles of existing bikeway
facilities within Yorba Linda and Placentia
(Figure 2. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Existing Bicycle Facilities). This includes
14.3miles of Class I shared-use paths, 29.6
miles of Class II bike lanes, 12.2 miles of
Class III bike routes, and .17 miles of Class IV
separated bikeways Table 2).
Table 2. Existing Bikeway Facilities within Yorba
Linda and Placentia
Facility Types Mileage
Class I Shared-Use Path 14.3
Class II Bike Lanes 29.6
Class III Bike Routes 12.2
Class IV Separated Bikeways .17
Existing Bikeway Network 56.3
27 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 23
Figure 2. Yorba Linda and Placentia Existing Bicycle Facilities Ä142
Ä241
Ä57
Ä55
Ä90
CROWTHER AVE VALLEYVIEWAVEORANGETHORPEAVE
SUNKIST STBASTANCHURYRD
JEFFERSON STTAFT AVE
ES P E R A N ZARDMEA T S AVECAN YON R IM RD
BUENA VISTA AVE
YO
R
B
A
LI
N
D
ABLVDSANTAANACANYONRDBRADFORD AVEPLACENTIA AVELAM B E R T RD
SHAFFER STRICHFIELD RDSA
NTI
A
G
OBL
VDGOLDEN AVE
GLASSELLSTKELLOGGDRV ALL E Y D RVAN BUREN STW
E
I
R
C
A
NY
ONRD
CHAPMANAVE VALENCIA AVERIO VISTA STN O H L R A NC H RDKRAEMER BLVDLINCO L N A V E FAIRMONTBL V
D
S TATECOLLEGEBLVDT
U
STINAVEHEIM AVE SERRANOAVELAKEVIEWAVEBREA BLVDCARBONCANY ONR D
TON N E R C A N Y ON RDASSOCIATEDRDLAPAL M A A V ESANTAFEAVEVISTADELMARSOQUELCANYONRDYORBARANCHRDSANANTON IORDBALL RD
TELEGRA PH C ANYON RD
ROSE DRMES
A
DRP E R A L TA H I L L SDRMOHLE
RDRRIVE R D A L E A VE VILLAGECENTERDRCANNONSTVIAA R B OLE S
GE R D A DR HI
DDENHIL L S R DMIRALOMA
A
V
EMELROSEST PROSPECT AVESOUTH ST EUREKA AVEBATAVIA STF R O NT E RAS T
SA T U RNSTMILLER
ST
BIRCH ST
PALM
D
R
CORONAD
O
S
T
LA JOLLA
S
T
TUSTIN STChino Hills
State Park
Santa Ana River
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA
EXISTING BICYCLE
FACILITIES
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
City Boundaries
Water
Parks
EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE
I - Shared Use Path
II - Bike Lane
III - Bike Route
IV - Separated Bikeway
0 0.7 1.4 MILES
28 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia24
Bicycle Parking
Knowing a secure place is available to store
a bike at a destination is an important part of
making a bicycle trip feasible and can help
encourage more bicycling in Yorba Linda and
Placentia. Bicycle parking is currently sparse
in both cities and mainly consists of wave racks
and inverted U racks. These can be found
at most schools and parks, in Yorba Linda’s
Historic Main Street and Old Town Placentia,
at Placentia Civic Center, near major shopping
centers, and around newer high-density
residential developments.
Decorative bike racks on E Crowther Avenue in
Placentia
Installation of new bicycle racks should
follow Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle
Professionals guidance. Short-term bike
racks should provide two points of contact
between the bike frame and the rack. U-racks
are an affordable and effective option for
this purpose. Bike racks that only secure the
wheel, such as wave racks or wheel racks,
should be avoided. For high-traffic areas or
popular destinations, longer-term bike parking
solutions, such as lockers, may be considered.
Long-term bike parking is designed for
extended use, providing secure storage for
bikes over several days or weeks. These
facilities are typically enclosed to prevent theft
and damage, and can include lockers, bike
rooms, or bike cages. Long-term bike parking
is particularly valuable near job centers and
locations with high activity. Yorba Linda and
Placentia should prioritize implementing long-
term parking solutions where feasible.
Existing Pedestrian
Facilities
Quality pedestrian facilities can contribute
to the ability of residents to walk to their
destinations. In many areas of Yorba Linda and
Placentia, pedestrian facilities offer access to
key destinations such as schools, parks, transit
stops/stations, and commercial areas. Existing
pedestrian facilities include sidewalks, shared-
use paths, pedestrian bridges, crosswalks,
and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.
Photos of these pedestrian facilities are shown
on page 27.
Most streets in both Yorba Linda and
Placentia have sidewalks. In 2023, Yorba
Linda completed an Access Compliance
Survey Report, which surveyed sidewalks and
curb ramps in the city for compliance with
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The report found 81.5 miles of the city’s 254
sidewalk miles to be ADA-compliant. Yorba
Linda will use this report as a guide to updating
its sidewalk network. As shown in Figure 3.
Yorba Linda Existing Sidewalks, more than
half of the streets lack sidewalk or trail facilities
due to certain areas of Yorba Linda being
designated as rural.
Figure 4. Placentia Existing Sidewalks
shows the existing sidewalks on Placentia’s
arterial and collector roadways. Most streets
in the city have sidewalks, including the local
roadways not illustrated in the map. In 2024,
the City of Placentia initiated the development
of an ADA Transition Plan and a self-evaluation
to ensure its existing sidewalks are accessible
for all community members, and the plan is
anticipated to be completed by late 2025.
29 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 25
Figure 3. Yorba Linda Existing Sidewalks
CHINO HILLS
VILLA PARK
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
Ä142
Ä241
Ä55 Santa Ana RiverChino Hills
State Park
YORBA LINDA
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
Water
City Boundaries
0 0.6 1.2 MILES
EXISTING LOCATIONS
Yorba Linda Sidewalks
30 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia26
Figure 4. Placentia Existing Sidewalks
FULLERTON
PLACENTIA
Ä90PLACENTIA
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
Water
City Boundaries
0 0.25 0.5 MILES
EXISTING LOCATIONS
Placentia Sidewalks
31 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 27
Sidewalk: A paved path alongside a street that
provides space for those walking separated from
vehicular traffic.
Shared-Use Path: A multi-purpose trail designed
for both those walking and those biking, separated
from vehicular traffic.
Pedestrian Bridge: A structure designed for
people walking to cross over obstacles like
railways, roads, and highways.
Crosswalk: A designated area on a street marked
by lines to clearly delineate the right-of-way for
those crossing the street.
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon: A traffic
safety device that uses flashing lights to alert
drivers to the presence of crossing pedestrians.
32 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia28
Existing Equestrian Facilities
The City of Yorba Linda contains over 100
miles of trails for use by equestrians in addition
to pedestrians and bicyclists. This trail network
provides off-street, non-vehicular connections
to open spaces and recreational areas
throughout the city. Furthermore, several of
the trails connect to a larger regional system
that links key recreation destinations including
Carbon Canyon Regional Park, Chino Hills
State Park, Yorba Linda Regional Park, and the
Santa Ana River Trail. Learn more about these
trails in Volume II: Yorba Linda Riding, Hiking,
and Bikeway Trails Element.
Yorba Linda also has several equestrian
facilities, including three staging areas and an
equestrian center. The staging areas provide
space for trailer parking and have connections
to Chino Hills State Park. The five-acre Phillip
S. Paxton Equestrian Center has an equestrian
show arena, a turnout arena, and a round pen.An equestrian crossing connecting two trails Pedestrian
Priority Zones
This Plan identifies three pedestrian priority
zones: two in Placentia and one in Yorba
Linda. Together, these three pedestrian priority
zones act as model areas for pedestrian
improvements throughout both cities.
The two pedestrian priority zones in Placentia
were selected because they represent
the areas within the city identified as
disadvantaged by CalEnviroScreen 4.0, a
tool developed by the California Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
that identifies communities disproportionately
burdened by pollution or health and
vulnerability factors. The third pedestrian
priority zone, located in Yorba Linda, was
selected by the City of Yorba Linda and
includes historic Main Street. The three zones
all feature important destinations including
housing, schools, parks, retail areas, and
public facilities that community members would
like to access by walking or biking. All three
are also located near or along major roadways
including Imperial Highway (State Route 90),
Orangethorpe Avenue, Yorba Linda Boulevard,
and State Route 57 (Orange Freeway).
33 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 29
Pedestrian
Priority Zones
The Chapman and Kraemer Pedestrian
Priority Zone in Placentia includes Old Town
Placentia, the City’s historic and compact
downtown area that will soon be home to the
Placentia Metrolink Station. Placentia’s second
pedestrian priority zone, the McFadden Park
Pedestrian Priority Zone, is centered around
important public facilities including McFadden
Park, La Placita Parkette, Jaycee Parkette,
Melrose Elementary School, and Valadez
Middle School Academy. The Yorba Linda
Downtown Pedestrian Priority Zone includes
the City of Yorba Linda’s historic downtown
area, home to the Yorba Linda Public Library
and newly constructed retail centers such as
the Yorba Linda Town Center.
Pedestrian Priority Zone Figure 5 -Figure 7
display the boundaries of each pedestrian
priority zone. The pedestrian recommendations
included in these zones were prioritized for
implementation by both Cities.
34 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia30
Figure 5. Pedestrian Priority Zone: Chapman and Kraemer, Placentia Ä57
Kraemer
Memorial
Park
Santa Fe
Park
Kraemer
Middle
Valencia High
KRAEMER BLVDCROWTHE
R
A
V
EBRADFORD AVEPLACENTIA AVEORANGETH
O
R
P
E
A
V
E
CONCORD
W
Y
CHAPMAN AVE
ENCIN
ITAS
WAY
LAVENDERLN
VALLEY FORGEDRALTA STTURF DR
PRIMROS
E
A
V
E
MARSEILLE DR
SANTAFE AVE
MOLOKAI DR
HAWAII WYOAHUWAY SARA JANE LNRUBY DR
CENTER
S
T
MONROE WY
MAUI LNTWILIGHT STCAMARILLO
ST
GEORGIA
C
I
R
BO YSENBERR
Y
L
N
M EL O D Y LN
WALNUT AVEMELROSE STMAIN STMURRAY STWILSON
A
V
E
FRONTAGE RDMASSACHUSETTS LNNEW JERSEY LNSANTE
F
E CT
I ND U
STRIAL
WAYSTARDUST STHU N D LE YS
T
R
ADCLIFF E
A
V
E
FRANKLIN D R
LANAILNSUNRISE STANGELINA DRANNED DRDIAMONDRDL A NCASTER
A
VE
RUTHERFORDRDKIMBERLY A
V
E
NUTWOODAVE
HARMON
Y
L
N
ALLEY
DEREK DREVE C
IR
CONNECTIC
U
T
W
A
Y
CARDINAL ST
PARTRIDGE STKAUAI LN
VENTURA
A
V
E
SANDPIPER
A
V
E
SUNSET
D
R
OLIVE STMOONBEAM STMOUNT VERNON WAYORANGE
G
R
O
V
E
A
V
E
ALTA VISTA ST
PORTER WYBACKS
L
N
RED GUM
ST
BAKER
S
TCAPISTRANO STORCHID
D
R
KENSINGTO
N
A
V
ESANTA BARBARA STRAMONA
S
T
KENT STMEADOWLARK LNPHEASANT STTEMPLE STYORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
Old Town Placentia Streetscape
Master Plan Area
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
CHAPMAN AND KRAEMER
PLACENTIA
35 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 31
Figure 6. Pedestrian Priority Zone: McFadden Park, Placentia Ä91
Ä57
La
Placita
Parkette
McFadden Park
Jaycee
Parkette Melrose
Elementary
Valadez Middle
School Academy
PLACENTIA AVEMELROSESTCROWTHE
R
A
V
E
MOISILNORANGETH
O
R
P
E
A
V
E
EASTWIND DR LAWRENCE AVE
PARADISE STNEBRASKA AVE
ALLEY
COZY TEBLUE GUM
STORTEGAWAYMONROE WY
BO Y S E N B ERRY L N
PORTE R W Y
MIRALOMA
W
A
Y
BRIARVALE AVE DUNNWAYLAPAL
M
A
A
V
E
LA CRESTA
A
V
E
EAST PARK
L
N FASHION
LNSEGOVIA
C
I
R
EASTON ST
I N D U
STRI
AL WAY
REGAL PAR
K
D
R
S
U
N
S
H
I
N
E
W
Y
WHITTIER STOHIO
AVE
TERRACE S
T
DALY ST BUCCANEER DR
KA NSAS
A
V
E
C
YPRESS ST
PRIVATE STWALLGREEN ST
BALSAM AVE
KIMBERLY AVE
MISSOURI A
V
E
M IR ALOMA
A
V
E
ROMNEYA DR
LA JOLLA
S
T
IOWA
PL
CORONAD
O
S
T
SUNKIST STVAN HORN
WYHUNDLEY WAYTAFOLLA ST
VIA
M
A
R
T
E
N
SARNOLD DRLAWRENCE STAVE DE
P
IO
P
ICO VISTA
AVEGONZALES ST
GRETTA LN
VIA BURTON RED GUM
STTEMPLE STBOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
MCFADDEN PARK
PLACENTIA
36 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia32
Figure 7. Pedestrian Priority Zone: Yorba Linda Downtown, Yorba Linda PIPER
ADAMS CEDARMONTEREY
EISENHOWERSUNNYKAYEWEST HILLDANZA PLAZASUNSET LN
LAURE
L
VI
E
W
WEST TERRACE SOUTHERN POINTESHA
D
Y
K
N
L
AVOLINDA
ALICIA
TRUMAN
SUMMITLOGAN LINDAMAINNORCRIS DANITADRY CREEK
NEWBURYFL
O
R
A
PRIVATERUTH SOUTHERN
H
I
L
L
S
BURKE
MAGEE VALENCIAOAK LEAF
YORBA L
N
SHOOK
G
A
R
D
E
N
LOS ALTOS LNTEDFORD WYVIA BUE
N
A
VI
D
A
LINDFORDJOSH
U
A FREDRICKZELLAI
M
P
E
R
I
A
L
VIA
S
E
R
E
N
OMCKINLEYCONDIEWISTER
I
A
MONSONROOSEVELTKENNEDY SYCAMORE CIRSEQUOIA
SHARON
P
A
R
K NIANTICHIGHLANDTOWN CENTER
JAM
A
I
C
A
T
E
R
MELODYHUMMINGBIRD
LA CASITACARI
SIESTABEN LOMOND
OAK TREEARROYO
EVERGREENBOEING
CITRIODORAHACIENDASYCAMORE
RIO DE ORO
RIO DE PLATAACORNLOGAN VIEWTIKI
T
O
R
C
H
LEMON AVOCADODORTHEANOGALDOU
G
L
A
S
SHOOK LNSHAW LNSCHOOLCAMELAMO
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
HAVEN
MARK
OLINDALOS ALTOSDEBI
MANDARIN
ROCKY POINTDEVILLEPLUMOSA
YORBA LINDA
LAKEVIEWORIENTE
BLAIR
ALTRUDY
EUREKAYORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Existing Trails
Parks
School Property
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
0 0.06 0.12 MILES
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
YORBA LINDA DOWNTOWN
YORBA LINDA
37 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 33
Key Destinations
Chino Hills State Park
Chino Hills State Park is in the foothills of
the Santa Ana Mountains along the northern
border of Yorba Linda. This park is a popular
regional destination for hiking, horseback
riding, and mountain biking. Over 60 miles of
trails allow access into the Chino-Puente Hills
Wildlife Corridor, offering opportunities to view
native plants and wildlife.
Santa Ana River Trail
The Santa Ana River Trail is a regional
recreation trail that, when complete, will span
110 miles from the Pacific Ocean to the San
Bernardino Mountains. Much of the trail south
of the City of Corona through Orange County
has been completed. Riders can continuously
ride from just west of Corona to Huntington
Beach on the Santa Ana River Trail. Sections
east of Yorba Linda, such as Corona, Eastvale,
and Norco are still under construction.
Transit Stations
As described on page 17, there are Metrolink
rail lines and stations located near Yorba Linda
and Placentia, including a planned station
at Melrose Avenue and Crowther Avenue.
Providing active transportation connections
to these stations can encourage residents to
walk and bike to these stations, creating a more
equitable transportation network. While transit
can help community members account for the
bulk of their trip, without safe walking and biking
facilities, community members may choose to
drive to their destinations instead, increasing the
number of vehicles on the road.
California State University
(CSU) Fullerton
Although CSU Fullerton is located just outside
the project area to the west, in the City of
Fullerton, many residents of Yorba Linda and
Placentia are among the 41,000 students
enrolled there. With the largest student body in
the CSU system, the campus faces significant
parking limitations and high costs. The active
transportation recommendations proposed in
Placentia aim to offer local residents alternative
options for commuting to and from the CSU
Fullerton campus.
Key destinations are those that community
members visit every day such as schools,
parks, libraries, and transit stations. Key
destinations can act as pedestrian generators,
or places that indicate the start or end
of a pedestrian trip. Providing safe and
connected active transportation infrastructure
to these destinations can reduce vehicle
miles traveled and can help the region in
achieving greenhouse gas reduction targets.
Recommendations in this Plan were made with
these key destinations in mind.
38 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia34
Figure 8. Yorba Linda and Placentia Key Destinations
39 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 35
Public Schools This Plan evaluates 28 schools, covering all public schools in Yorba Linda and Placentia. All schools
are part of the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School
District. The remaining schools in the Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School District are not evaluated as
part of this Plan, as any improvements to the streets
surrounding these campuses fall under the jurisdiction
of the City of Anaheim or the City of Fullerton. These
schools include Glenview Elementary, Rio Vista
Elementary, Topaz Elementary, Woodsboro Elementary,
and Esperanza High School. Recommendations for
these schools are therefore not included in this Plan.
Table 3 shows the schools, their grade level, and the
city in which they are located. Figure 9. Yorba Linda
and Placentia Existing School Locations shows the
location of each school.
School Name Grade Level City
Bernardo Yorba Middle School 7–8 Yorba Linda
Brookhaven Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Bryant Ranch School TK–5 Yorba Linda
El Camino Real High School 9–12 (Continuation)Placentia El Dorado High School 9–12 Placentia
Fairmont Elementary School TK–6 Yorba Linda
George Key School Special Education Placentia
Glenknoll Elementary School TK–6 Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County Golden Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Kraemer Middle School 7–8 Placentia
Lakeview Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Linda Vista Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Mabel M. Paine Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Melrose Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Morse Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Table 3. Placentia-Yorba Linda Schools
Table continued on the following page
40 Existing Conditions Yorba Linda-Placentia36
Parkview School TK–12 (Home School)Placentia
Rose Drive Elementary School TK–5 Yorba Linda
Ruby Drive Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Sierra Vista Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Travis Ranch School TK–8 Yorba Linda
Tuffree Middle School 7–8 Placentia
Tynes Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Valadez Middle School Academy 6–8 Placentia
Valencia High School 9–12 Placentia
Van Buren Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Wagner Elementary School TK–6 Placentia
Yorba Linda High School 9–12 Yorba Linda
Yorba Linda Middle School 6–8 Yorba Linda
41 Existing ConditionsActive Transportation Plan 37
Figure 9. Yorba Linda and Placentia Existing School Locations 42 43
Needs Analysis03
44 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia40
Introduction
This needs analysis outlines the findings
of the commute trend, equity analysis,
collision analysis, and land use suitability
analysis. These analyses helped the project
team understand where there are gaps in
the bikeway and pedestrian network and
where new or improved active transportation
facilities are needed. Disconnected active
transportation networks can result in longer
travel times and uncomfortable transportation
options for community members and can
create barriers in the transportation network.
The commute trend analysis provides insight
into residents’ preferred means of commuting
to work in Yorba Linda and Placentia compared
to statewide preferences. The equity analysis
identifies communities that face inequitable
social and health factors. Identifying these
communities helps Yorba Linda and Placentia
understand where active transportation
improvements should be prioritized. The
collision analysis explores historic pedestrian
and bicycle collisions, providing an
understanding of where improvements are
most urgently needed in the cities. Finally, the
land suitability analysis uses environmental
data and land use characteristics to pinpoint
parts of each city where constructing and
improving the active transportation network is
most feasible.
Commute Trend
approximately 120,000 residents, comprising
about 4% of the Orange County’s total
population. Major county employment centers,
such as Disney, the University of California,
and larger Kaiser Permanente hospitals
are located outside of both cities, likely
encouraging workers to travel by car.
Residents’ choice in travel mode to work can
reflect existing infrastructure and connectivity,
as well as cultural attitudes toward automobile
use in Placentia and Yorba Linda.
According to the 2022 American Community
Survey, most residents of Yorba Linda and
Placentia commute to work by driving alone
(74%). In Yorba Linda, an additional 0.5% use
public transit, 0.5% reported walking, and
0.3% reported biking to work. In Placentia,
approximately 2% use public transit, 2% walk
to work, and 0.6% bike to work. Both cities
have approximately 2% of residents who do not
have access to a vehicle.
When looking at California as a whole,
most people still commute to work by driving
alone (68%). An additional 4% use public
transportation, 2% reported walking, and 0.7%
reported biking to work. Approximately 3% of
all California residents do not have access to
a vehicle.
Both Yorba Linda and Placentia are suburban
cities in northeastern Orange County. The
two cities exhibit a wide variation in land use
diversity and population density, with lower
densities prevailing in many areas. Together,
Yorba Linda and Placentia are home to
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
74%
0.3%
0.5%
5%
0.5%
Yorba Linda
Commute
Trends
45 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 41
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
0.7%2%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
0.7%2%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
0.7%2%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
0.7%2%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
0.7%2%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
74%
0.3%
0.5%
5%
0.5%
Yorba Linda
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
74%
0.6%2%
8%
2%
Placentia
Commute
Trends
DRIVE
ALONE
CARPOOL PUBLIC
TRANSIT
WALK BIKE
68%
0.7%2%
10%
4%
California
Commute
Trends
Yorba Linda commute trends data is provided
by U.S. Census Bureau. American Community
Survey Table S0801, 2022.
Placentia commute trends data is provided by
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community
Survey Table S0801, 2022.
California commute trends data is provided by
U.S. Census Bureau. American Community
Survey Table S0801, 2022.
The percentages in the pie charts do not total 100% due to unaccounted-for categories, such as telecommuting and other miscellaneous modes of travel (e.g., taxi). 46 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia42
Equity Analysis
These “SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities”
are shown in red in Figure 10. Yorba Linda
and Placentia SB 535 Disadvantaged
Communities. In Yorba Linda, very little of the
city is considered disadvantaged. The few high
scores in southwest Placentia and south Yorba
Linda are likely due to the industrial land use
near the Santa Ana River and exposure from
State Route 57 (Orange Freeway) and State
Route 91.
The equity analysis is a review of state and
regional equity tools to identify disadvantaged
communities in Yorba Linda and Placentia.
The CalEnviroScreen 4.0 tool created by
the California Office of Environmental Health
Hazard Assessment identifies communities that
are disproportionately burdened by pollution
(see Figure 10. Yorba Linda and Placentia
SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities).
CalEnviroScreen uses pollution indicators—like
levels of ozone concentration and drinking
water contaminants—and social and health
indicators—like poverty levels, rates of
disease, and housing burdens on residents—
to provide a cumulative impact score for each
census tract in the state. In 2012, Senate Bill
(SB) 535 (De León, Chapter 830, Statutes
of 2012) established initial requirements for
minimum funding levels for various state grant
programs to “Disadvantaged Communities”
(DACs).
47 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 43
Figure 10. Yorba Linda and Placentia SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities 48 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia44
The Healthy Places Index (Figure 11. Yorba
Linda and Placentia Healthy Places Index),
developed by the Public Health Alliance of
Southern California, determines how healthy a
census tract is using characteristics such as
level of education, healthcare access, housing
availability, transportation access, and social
environment. In general, the cities of Yorba
Linda and Placentia have healthier community
conditions than 75% of other California cities.
The census tract in the south and west of
Placentia that scores lowest on the Healthy
Places Index is mostly industrial; therefore,
residents in the area have more limited access
to community destinations like healthcare
centers and parks.
49 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 45
Figure 11. Yorba Linda and Placentia Healthy Places Index 50 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia46
Collision Analysis
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Collision History
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia
experienced 1,607 crashes from 2013 to 2022.
Of these, 133 crashes involved people biking,
and 135 crashes involved people walking.
Bicycle- and pedestrian-involved accidents
account for 16% of all collisions.
Collisions in Yorba Linda and Placentia cluster
along Yorba Linda Boulevard, which is an east-
west street that crosses both Yorba Linda and
Placentia, as well as Rose Drive, a north-south
street, crossing both Yorba Linda and Placentia
as well. Notably, there are more and denser
collisions toward the west of the study area,
particularly in Placentia (see Figure 12. Yorba
Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian
Crashes from 2013 to 2022, by Severity and
Figure 13. Yorba Linda and Placentia Active
Transportation Crashes Clustered from 2013
to 2022, by Severity).
Data on bicycle- and pedestrian-involved
collisions can provide insight into the overall
safety of the transportation network and help
identify locations or roadways that tend to have
higher collision rates. Collisions in Yorba Linda
and Placentia were analyzed citywide and at
specific locations. These insights informed
the development of project and programmatic
recommendations for Yorba Linda and
Placentia to address challenges people face
while walking and biking.
51 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 47
Figure 12. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes from 2013 to 2022, by Severity !!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
CHINO HILLS
ORANGE
FULLERTON
ANAHEIM
BREA
VILLA PARK
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
LOS ANGELES
Ä142
Ä241
Ä57
Ä55
Ä90
Ä90 FAIR M O NTBL VDVI
STADE L MARROSE DRHIDD E
NHILL
SRDPROSPECT AVEE S P E RANZARDSanta Ana River
Chino Hills
State Park
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA
BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN CRASHES
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
0 0.75 1.5 MILES
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
CRASHES
Bike Crashes
!Fatality
!Severe Injury
!Visible Injury or Complaint
Pedestrian Crashes
!Fatality
!Severe Injury
!Visible Injury or Complaint
BOUNDARIES
City Boundaries
Parks
Water
The collision data from 2013 to 2022 is provide by
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS),
Safe Transportation Research and Education
Center, University of California, Berkeley. 2024.
52 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia48
Figure 13. Yorba Linda and Placentia Active Transportation Crashes Clustered from 2013 to 2022, by Severity Larger icons indicate a denser
cluster of collisions.
Fatality
Fatality
53 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 49
A significant portion of the active transportation
crashes occurred at the western boundary,
in the La Jolla and Old Town disadvantaged
communities of Placentia. Spatially, this
analysis reveals that bicycle collisions
occurred more often in Placentia and that
these incidents were often more severe in
nature (Figure 14. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes Profile, by
Severity). Key takeaways from these collisions
include:
ºOf all bicycle and pedestrian crashes, 10%
are severe-injury crashes, while only 4% of
vehicle crashes are severe-injury crashes.
Among all crashes, only 5% are severe-
injury crashes, which shows that bicycle
and pedestrian severe-injury crashes
occur twice as often as all types
of crashes.
ºActive transportation-related crashes,
especially for pedestrians, are more likely
to be fatal and severe than other crashes.
Figure 14. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes Profile, by Severity
FATALITY
BikeCrashes PedCrashes Bike/PedCrashes VehicleCrashes AllCrashes SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
O%
9%1O%
81%
5%
1O%
85%
1%4%
95%
2%5%
93%
1O%
9O%
54 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia50
Figure 15. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle Crashes by Severity by YearFigure 15. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle Crashes by Severity by Year and Figure
16. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian
Crashes by Severity by Year display the trend
of bicycle crashes and pedestrian crashes
over the study years. Key takeaways from
these collisions include:
ºBicycle crashes have a decreasing trend
among all kinds of injuries, from 28 fatal or
injury crashes in 2013 to 5 injury crashes
in 2022, with no fatal or severe-injury
crashes reported.
ºPedestrian crashes show an increasing
trend of crashes from 2019 (3 crashes) to
2022 (17 crashes).
ºThere were fewer fatal or severe-injury
crashes in 2019 than other years for both
bicycle and pedestrian crashes.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
COMPLAINT
OF PAIN
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 55
Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 51
FATALITY SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
COMPLAINT
OF PAIN
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 20220
5 10
15 20
25 Figure 16. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian Crashes by Severity by Year ºIn Yorba Linda and Placentia, 11% of pedestrian fatal or severe-injury crashes
occurred when it was dark and streetlights
were available. Only 6% of pedestrian
fatal or severe-injury crashes occurred in
daylight conditions.
56 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia52
ºIn Yorba Linda and Placentia, fatal or
severe-injury crashes for pedestrians most
often happened when pedestrians were
crossing outside a crosswalk (7%). Overall,
45% of all severity-types of pedestrian
collisions occurred while the pedestrian
was crossing the street at an intersection
with a crosswalk.
Figure 17. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle Crashes by Light Conditions SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
Dark -Street Lights Dusk orDawn Daylight
5%
17%
2%3%3%
70%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
57 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 53
Figure 18. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian Crashes by Light Conditions
FATALITY SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
Dark - NoStreet Lights Dark - StreetLights Dusk orDawn Daylight 1%1%
5%7%
24%
1%3%2%4%
53%
0%0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
58 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia54
ºA total of 26% of all pedestrian crashes
occurred in disadvantaged communities
in Placentia (see Figure 20. Active
Transportation Collisions and Equity
and Figure 21. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes and
Disadvantaged Communities).
ºMost bicycle crashes in a disadvantaged
communities occurred along Chapman
Avenue in Old Town and Orangethorpe
Avenue in the La Jolla neighborhood.
There is an existing Class II bike lane along
East Chapman Avenue between Central
Avenue and Orangethorpe Avenue, and
along Orangethorpe Avenue.
ºMost pedestrian crashes occurred along
Chapman Avenue in Old Town and West La
Jolla Street in the La Jolla neighborhood.
The La Jolla neighborhood is bisected by
State Route 57 (Orange Freeway). West La
Jolla Street connects the neighborhood
with a two-lane bridge over the freeway,
with well-used sidewalks.
Figure 19. Yorba Linda and Placentia Pedestrian Crashes by Pedestrian Action 2%
7%
2%2%
10%
3%
20%
1%
3%2%
40%
0%0%0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
FATALITY SEVERE
INJURY
VISIBLE
INJURY
Not inRoad InRoad Crossing
Not at Xwalk
Crossing
Xwalk not at
Intersection
Crossing
Xwalk at
Intersection
4%4%
59 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 55
Figure 20. Active Transportation Collisions and Equity
BICYCLECRASHES
3%3%
23%
56%
7%
63%PEDESTRIANCRASHES
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
IN EQUITY
AREA
NOT IN
EQUITY AREA
% KSI % Non-KSI % KSI % Non-KSI
28%
18%
60 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia56
Figure 21. Yorba Linda and Placentia Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes and Disadvantaged Communities !!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
CHINO HILLS
ORANGE
FULLERTON
ANAHEIM
BREA
VILLA PARK
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
LOS ANGELES
Ä142
Ä241
Ä57
Ä55
Ä90
Ä90 FAIR M O NTBL VDVI
STADE L MARROSE DRHIDD E
NHILL
SRDPROSPECT AVEE S P E RANZARDSanta Ana River
Chino Hills
State Park
YORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA
BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN CRASHES
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
0 0.75 1.5 MILES
BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN
CRASHES
Bike Crashes
!Fatality
!Severe Injury
!Visible Injury or Complaint
Pedestrian Crashes
!Fatality
!Severe Injury
!Visible Injury or Complaint
BOUNDARIES
City Boundaries
Disadvantaged Community
Parks
Water
The collision data from 2013 to 2022 is provide by
Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS),
Safe Transportation Research and Education
Center, University of California, Berkeley. 2024.
61 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 57
Crash Locations
Assessment
A review of crash data (2018-2022) identified
11 locations in Yorba Linda and Placentia that
had experienced collisions resulting in fatalities
or serious injuries to people walking or biking.
These locations received countermeasure
suggestions that can effectively reduce future
serious or fatality crashes. The lists below
summarize the locations and suggested
countermeasures.
The studied crash locations in order of
recency are:
1. Valley View Circle & Bramble Court,
Yorba Linda
2. North Rose Drive & Landmark Avenue,
Yorba Linda
3. Casa Loma Avenue & Imperial Highway,
Yorba Linda
4. Stonewood Drive & Hidden Hills Road,
Yorba Linda
5. North Kraemer Boulevard & East
Bastanchury Road, Placentia
6. Dorinda Road & Yorba Linda Boulevard,
Yorba Linda
7. Welsh Pony Lane & Red Roan Lane,
Yorba Linda
8. Van Buren Street & Yorba Linda Boulevard,
Yorba Linda
9. South Melrose Street & West La Jolla
Street, Placentia
10. Casa Oro Drive & Casa Hermosa Drive,
Yorba Linda
11. North Community Drive & Orangethorpe
Avenue, Placentia
The countermeasures below summarize the
types of improvements that both cities can
make citywide to address broader systemic
issues within their transportation network.
Details about countermeasures at each
specific location can be found in Appendix H:
Crash Locations Assessment.
ºStripe high-visibility crosswalk markings
ºImplement traffic calming devices for traffic
control and speed management
ºConstruct bike facilities
ºConduct an impaired driver campaign
The Federal Highway Administration’s Proven
Safety Countermeasures resource provides
further info on infrastructure strategies
that can be applied systemically to reduce
roadway fatalities and serious injuries involving
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Suitability
Analysis
The suitability analysis identified potential
areas where easements could be implemented
to extend existing active transportation
infrastructure or create new infrastructure
using proximity to common destinations and
environmental variables included in land use
data (Figure 22. Yorba Linda and Placentia
Suitable Parcels for Active Transportation).
A suitability score was created based on both
the distance of parcels from destinations such
as commercial district areas, libraries, schools,
city halls, and parks; proximity to disadvantaged
communities; and environmental data.
Environmental data included a review of parcels
that may be susceptible to natural disasters
such as those in the 100 Year Flood Plain, in an
earthquake fault zone, or in a landslide hazard
zone. Environmental data also included a review
of parcels in wildlife habitats and conservation
areas. The highest-scoring parcels were used
by the project team as areas to study during
fieldwork and to consider for improved and new
active transportation recommendations. The
highest-scoring parcels are those that connect
to the most destinations and disadvantaged
communities, are at lower risks for natural
disasters, and would be least disruptive to
natural habitats.
62 Needs Analysis Yorba Linda-Placentia58
Figure 22. Yorba Linda and Placentia Suitable Parcels for Active Transportation 63 Needs AnalysisActive Transportation Plan 59
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
64 65
Public Outreach
and Engagement04
66 Public Outreach and Engagement Yorba Linda-Placentia62 Introduction
Community engagement is important for
understanding the needs and desires of the
community members who may use the active
transportation improvements recommended
in this Plan. A variety of engagement
strategies were used to gather feedback
for the Plan from Yorba Linda and Placentia
residents. Community members and visitors
were engaged through pop-up events, flyer
distribution, social media posts, community
workshops, demonstration events, and
online tools.
These community engagement approaches
targeted Yorba Linda and Placentia residents,
people who work in both cities, and visitors
to both cities. Participants had the option to
discuss their primary mode of transportation,
express their concerns about the current active
transportation system in Yorba Linda and
Placentia, and provide suggestions that reflect
their needs. Based on community feedback,
this Plan identified areas where community
members do not feel comfortable walking and
biking. This feedback was also used to develop
the recommendations in this Plan.
Social Media
Social media posts were published by the
Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia to promote
the project and the in-person and virtual
community meetings and explain how to
comment during the initial outreach period.
The posts were developed by the outreach
team and posted regularly on the Cities’ social
media accounts on Facebook, Instagram,
and Twitter. The posts included project
information, meeting information, and a call to
action to provide comments on the online map
to be incorporated into the draft Plan.
The complete archive of social media posts
can be referenced in Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary.
Outreach Notification
To effectively notify community members in
Yorba Linda and Placentia about the draft
Active Transportation Plan and encourage
them to submit feedback, the Plan was
advertised in a variety of ways, such as email
notifications, social media, City newsletters,
and flyers.
Email Notification
Emails were distributed to the stakeholder
email list to promote the start of the initial
outreach period, community meetings, and
the online comment map, and encourage
participation throughout. A total of four
emails were distributed to the stakeholder
list consisting of approximately 160 email
addresses between Wednesday, November
29, 2023, and the closing of the outreach
period on Wednesday, January 31, 2024.
Outreach Methods
67 Public Outreach and EngagementActive Transportation Plan 63 Outreach Methods
Community Meeting Flyer
The community meeting flyers promoted the
project, the upcoming community meetings,
and the project webpage, and explained how
to submit feedback. See Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary for an example of the
community meeting flyer. Virtual community
meeting flyers were distributed via social
media posts and City email notifications.
The flyers were used to directly notify the
community and to inform residents of key
areas, with physical flyers distributed to the
following community locations:
ºFenix Cycling (Yorba Linda)
ºJax Bicycle Center (Yorba Linda)
ºPlacentia Library (Placentia)
ºWhitten Community Center (Placentia)
Project Website
The project website (virtualeventroom.com/
yorba-linda-placentia-atp) served as the
clearinghouse for all public Plan information,
including the project overview, goals, and
schedule. The website linked community
members to project maps and fact sheets, kept
them up to date with the Plan’s progress, and
provided a forum for the review of recorded
community meetings. The website also posted
flyers about upcoming meetings. The fact
sheets and community meeting materials
were available in both English and Spanish.
Furthermore, community members could
provide feedback, contact the project team,
and sign up for project notifications via the
project website.
68 Public Outreach and Engagement Yorba Linda-Placentia64 Figure 23. Yorba Linda and Placentia Online Feedback Map Screenshot Online Feedback Map
Available on the project website, the online
feedback map was a public interactive map
allowing community members to virtually
select specific locations that they would like
to see walking and biking improvements on.
Existing and planned facilities were shown to
help community members identify network
connections across the two cities. Participants
could drop points or draw lines with comments
on the map for improvements to active
transportation trails, bikeways, pathways,
and more. Participants could then “like” or
“dislike” other comments that they did or did
not agree with, which helped to show which
improvements or connections had the most
public support. Over 200 comments were
received on the map between October 2023
and February 2024. See Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary for the database. General
themes included:
ºMake sidewalk and crossing improvements
(e.g., curb ramps, crossing signals)
ºClose gaps in trail and bikeway networks
ºImprove access to Chino Hills State Park,
Carbon Canyon, and surrounding cities
ºBetter maintain existing active
transportation facilities
The public online feedback map (Figure 23.
Yorba Linda and Placentia Online Feedback
Map Screenshot) is useful in understanding
community needs and recommending
infrastructure and programming that can
appropriately address these needs. The online
feedback map comments, lines, and points
were transferred to geographic information
systems mapping software to make the
recommendations in this Plan. In this way,
bicycle routes or pedestrian improvements
could be recommended in the exact areas
where community members have concerns.
69 Public Outreach and EngagementActive Transportation Plan 65 Outreach Events
Date & Time Event Walks-Ups Barrier &
Destination
Sticky Notes
Sign-Ups Feedback
Forms
Saturday, October 14,
2023
10 a.m. – 4 p.m.
Placentia Heritage Festival
Tri-City Regional Park
2301 N. Kraemer Blvd.,
Placentia, CA 92870
50 (2
Spanish
speakers)
20 3 4 (written)
Saturday,
December 2, 2023
4 p.m. – 9 p.m.
Holiday on Main Street
4905 Main St.
Yorba Linda, CA 92886
40 1 2 0
Saturday,
May 4, 2024
Yorba Days
Main Street Yorba Linda, 4910
Main St, Yorba Linda, CA
92886
40 18 0 2
Tuesday,
October 8, 2024
Yorba Linda Community
Center
4501 Casa Loma Ave, Yorba
Linda, CA 92886
40 NA 0 1
Thursday,
October 10, 2024
6 p.m.- 8p.m.
Old Town LIVE! Autumn Series
100 Block of Santa Fe Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
3 NA 0 0
Saturday,
October 19, 2024
7:30 a.m. - 6 p.m.
Placentia Heritage Festival
401 E Chapman Avenue
Placentia, CA 92870
60 NA 0 1
Table 4. Interactive Pop-UpsOutreach events provide an opportunity for community members who may not typically be
engaged in the planning process to provide
their feedback and suggestions. The project
team hosted four pop-up events, one virtual
town hall, one virtual workshop, two in-person
community meetings, one parent-teacher
association (PTA) council presentation and
walk audits at 28 project schools in Placentia-
Yorba Linda Unified School District.
Interactive Pop-Ups
Four interactive pop-up events were held at
community events in each city during the fall
of 2023 and the summer of 2024. Table 4
provides details for each event:
The pop-up events allowed the project team
to go directly to the public to seek input,
engage the community, and inform them
about the project. The team shared the fact
sheets in English and Spanish with booth
visitors and had sign-in sheets to add to the
project distribution database, presentation
boards that provided information on bicycle
and pedestrian facilities, and iPads with the
online feedback map. Additionally, a physical
version of the online feedback map with barrier
70 Public Outreach and Engagement Yorba Linda-Placentia66 and destination sticky notes was available
as another means to collect data. Feedback
forms were also used to encourage attendees
to submit comments on the project. Common
topics heard from the community included
support for the Plan and active transportation
generally, the need for traffic light
improvements on certain streets, concerns
about uncomfortable walking conditions due to
drivers not stopping for pedestrians, the need
for more visible crosswalks and timed crossing
lights, the desire for separating bike lanes and
driving lanes, the need for ramps on sidewalks,
and the importance of maintaining horse trails.
Monday,
October 21, 2024
Yorba Linda Public Library
4852 Lakeview Ave, Yorba
Linda, CA 92886
30 NA 0 0
Friday,
October 25, 2024
Placentia Library
411 E Chapman Ave,
Placentia, CA 92870
20 NA 0 0
Wednesday,
October 30, 2024
3:30 p.m.- 4:30 p.m.
Yorba Linda Country Riders
Meeting Virtual
4 NA NA NA
Total Engagement 287 39 5 8
71 Public Outreach and EngagementActive Transportation Plan 67 Virtual Town Hall
The virtual town hall, held via Zoom on
January 11, 2024, included a welcome, staff
introductions, and a project presentation, and
concluded with an informal question-and-
answer session. A Zoom Spanish interpretation
channel was available.
Eight participants attended the virtual town
hall, including representatives from community
organizations such as the Yorba Linda Traffic
Commission, Canyon Velo Cycling Club, Cal
State Fullerton, and the Orange County Health
Care Agency. Key themes and concerns
raised by participants included accessibility
for submitting comments, bike and pedestrian
crash statistics, data from fitness tracking apps,
existing planned improvements, current bike
lanes and pedestrian features, bike and car
parking, and connections to bike lanes and
trails in other cities.
Final Virtual Workshop
A second virtual community meeting was
held on October 22, 2024, with 13 attendees
participating, including representatives from
local organizations such as the Canyon Velo
Cycling Club, Wagner Elementary School,
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District,
and Orange County Sheriff’s Department.
The meeting focused on providing an update
on the Plan’s progress and gathering additional
input from community members on the draft
Plan and recommendations. There was general
support for the recommendations presented,
and several participants requested that the
meeting’s presentation be made available on
the project website for further review.
In-Person
Community Meeting
As part of the project’s outreach process, two
in-person community meetings were held,
taking place in each of the partnering cities.
The first in-person meeting was conducted at
the Yorba Linda Public Library in Yorba Linda
on January 17, 2024. The second in-person
meeting was held at the Whitten Community
Center in Placentia on January 18, 2024.
These in-person community meetings followed
an open house format, which helped to solicit
meaningful feedback and engagement with
participants. The format allowed participants
to attend at their leisure and created a more
casual and inviting atmosphere. These
workshops featured display boards, along with
project staff strategically placed around the
room at “stations” that featured specific topics.
The project staff also facilitated conversations
and answered questions.
Each meeting began with a brief introduction
presentation that included a welcome, an
overview of the Plan, its purpose and goals,
and an overview of outreach efforts. The
meetings featured seven project poster boards
and fact sheets, and feedback forms were
provided to attendees at the welcome and
sign-in table at the entrance. Participants
were encouraged to submit written comments
through the feedback form as well as via the
project website.
Seven participants attended the first meeting
in Yorba Linda, and two attended the second
meeting in Placentia. Participants included
representatives from Moms of Yorba Linda,
the Orange County Sheriff’s Department,
the Yorba Linda Traffic Commission, the
Canyon Velo Cycling Club, and the Yorba
Linda Planning Commission. Key themes and
concerns raised included pedestrian safety,
the need for more crosswalks, especially
around schools, tree roots damaging
sidewalks, the addition and separation of
bike lanes and vehicle travel lanes, signage
for bike lanes, updated signal and crosswalk
timing, grant and funding distribution,
active transportation trails in Placentia (near
Bastanchury Road), and trail amenities.
72 Public Outreach and Engagement Yorba Linda-Placentia68 PTA Council
Presentations
The project team presented at a Placentia-
Yorba Linda Unified Council of PTAs/PTSAs
meeting on June 5, 2024. This presentation
provided general information on the project
and recent updates, and garnered feedback.
It included a project overview and discussion
of the project’s schedule, goals, technical
study updates, walk audits, and a survey
summary. The project team provided a flyer
to promote the upcoming release of the draft
recommendations, and a fact sheet in English
and Spanish. Attendees were informed that
they can provide feedback at any time on the
project website and via the parent survey..
School Walk Audits
The project team observed school arrival or
dismissal at each of the 28 project schools.
The purpose of these observations was to
understand school circulation patterns, identify
barriers to walking and biking, and document
driver behavior. Each school observation was
coupled with a walk audit conducted with
school stakeholders. School stakeholders
included parents/caregivers, principals,
school staff, and others. The purpose of the
walk audits was to introduce participants to
the project and its goals, teach participants
about Safe Routes to School infrastructure
and non-infrastructure strategies, and provide
opportunities for participants to provide input
on their needs, concerns, and preferences.
Walk audits also included identification and
documentation of barriers to safe walking,
biking, skateboarding, and scooting to and
from school.
The project team gave walk audit participants
pens, clipboards, and maps of their school.
Maps displayed existing conditions within a
one-quarter and one-half mile radius of the
school. The maps also included space for
participants to record notes. All materials
were provided in English and Spanish, and
outreach was conducted in English with
Spanish interpretation as needed. The project
team invited participants to communicate
deficiencies and safety concerns about
routes to school verbally or via the paper
walk audit map. The project team was on
hand to document the participants’ feedback
and discuss potential solutions to improve
active transportation conditions along the
route to school. The feedback from walk audit
participants heavily informed the infrastructure
and non-infrastructure components of each
school’s project recommendations. Each
school’s observation and walk audit were
summarized in a Walk Audit Report.
A summary of each school’s audit can
be found in Chapter 5. The full Walk Audit
Report can be found in Appendix C: Public
Outreach Summary.
73 Public Outreach and EngagementActive Transportation Plan 69 Technical Advisory
Committee Meetings
Seven Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
meetings were held throughout the Plan
development. The TAC members provided
feedback on project materials including
the draft recommendations and prioritized
projects. The TAC also helped the Cities better
understand issues and challenges related to
active transportation and provided context for
this multi-jurisdictional project. Additionally,
the TAC offered information about community
events where pop-ups could be held and
suggested channels the Cities could use to
market the Plan to community members. TAC
members also advised on potential projects
and programmatic recommendations with
consideration to the Plan’s goals. The TAC
also helped the project team reach
disadvantaged community members in the
planning process and helped ensure that
the two partnering cities considered their
needs when forming recommendations.
TAC members helped the project team by
advertising Plan activities and engagement
opportunities and encouraging their networks
to participate in providing feedback.
74 75
Recommendations05
76 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia72
Introduction
families safe while walking or biking to
school. The Plan also includes recommended
infrastructure that closes crucial gaps,
connects City infrastructure to neighboring
cities, and provides connections through
areas where there are barriers to using active
transportation. Previous planning documents
such as each city’s General Plans, and
existing Capital Improvement Programs
(CIP) were also considered during the
recommendations process.
Safety was also an important factor in deciding
where active transportation recommendations
were needed. Completed safety analyses for
this Plan helped identify where improvements
and countermeasures were needed, and the
types of recommendations that would best
address these safety issues.
Finally, community input played an important
role in the recommendation process. The
bicycle and pedestrian recommendations
in this Plan were built on feedback received
from public outreach and engagement events,
interactive town halls, and open houses and
workshops. The recommendations were
developed to fit the needs of the community
members who will one day use these facilities.
Chapter Layout
This chapter is divided into four sections. The
first section, starting on page 73 provides
more information about the process that was
followed to develop the recommendations in
this Plan. This section also includes a toolkit of
facilities and infrastructure recommended, and
explains potential tradeoffs involved.
The second and third sections detail
recommendations for Yorba Linda and
Placentia, respectively. This includes the
bicycle recommendations, pedestrian
recommendations in the pedestrian priority
zones, and the Safe Routes to School
recommendations for each city.
The final section contains a list of non-
infrastructure program recommendations
for both cities. These programmatic
recommendations are important for creating
an active transportation network that bicyclists
and pedestrians feel comfortable using.
Developing recommendations for a Multi-
Agency Active Transportation Plan requires
a holistic understanding of community
conditions, needs, and values. This includes:
ºPrevious planning documents and policies
ºThe existing bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure and network gaps
ºThe existing trail network
ºRoad level of traffic stress
ºCollision history
ºFrequently visited destinations
ºConsideration of community desires
This Plan is focused on improvements that
will enable residents to safely use active
transportation to connect to local and regional
destinations while focusing on the needs and
concerns expressed by the residents of Yorba
Linda and Placentia.
For both bicycle and pedestrian
recommendations, connections to frequently
visited destinations were important in the
Plan’s recommendations process. The Plan
includes Safe Routes to School (STRS)
recommendations near schools in Yorba
Linda and Placentia to keep children and
77 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 73
Recommendations Process/Methodology
To develop recommendations for pedestrian
infrastructure, the project team identified
three priority zones spanning Yorba Linda
and Placentia. These zones encompass
disadvantaged communities, and areas
with a high need for improved infrastructure,
multiple pedestrian destinations, and a built
environment supportive of walking, including
downtown districts and bustling commercial
centers. The pedestrian recommendations
in these zones are centered on establishing
safe, high-quality crossings for pedestrians at
critical intersections and arterial roads, while
also implementing traffic calming measures in
zones experiencing high pedestrian activity.
This approach not only enhances pedestrian
safety but also promotes walkability and
connectivity within these urban hubs.
To develop the most effective bicycle
recommendations, the project team carefully
considered existing street conditions, the
surrounding context, and public input.
The proposed bicycle network establishes
comprehensive infrastructure across Yorba
Linda and Placentia, prioritizing primary east-
west and north-south connections. The public
input map and suggestions from community
groups and stakeholders were used to
identify gaps within the existing network
and the most popular routes to destinations
around the city that could accommodate
bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Many
recommendations enhance existing lanes
with improved separation and protection from
moving vehicles.
In both Placentia and Yorba Linda, new
routes were strategically planned to optimize
connections between major destinations
such as schools, parks, civic centers, and
commercial areas, considering factors such
as roadway stress, topography, land use, and
feasibility.
Each of the recommendations in this Plan is
planning-level. Recommendations were made
considering each of the factors described
above; however, additional design and
engineering studies will be required to verify
the feasibility of each recommendation before
implementation. Some corridors, notably Yorba
Linda Boulevard, in Yorba Linda and Placentia
will require further study to determine the
feasibility and design of bicycle and pedestrian
infrastructure. Yorba Linda Boulevard is a
major arterial that would provide a key bicycle
connection between the two cities, however
due to current traffic volumes and speeds a
Class I or Class IV bikeway is necessary to
create the most comfortable experience for
bicyclists. A corridor specific study should be
performed to address these issues and design
safe and feasible bike infrastructure along the
boulevard.
Finally, in order to create an active
transportation network that provides access
across major barriers like state highways,
Yorba Linda and Placentia may need to
coordinate with other jurisdictions such as
Caltrans, Orange County Public Works, the City
of Fullerton, and CSU Fullerton. For example,
proposed ADA Ramps at Placentia Avenue
and Santa Fe Avenue, below State Route 57
(Orange Freeway), are at a location considered
Tier 2 (medium need) in the Caltrans Active
Transportation (CAT) Plan. The CAT Plan also
identifies Orangethorpe Avenue as a Tier 2
corridor. Accordingly, these ADA ramps and
recommendations along Orangethorpe Avenue
should be coordinated with Caltrans when they
are ready to be implemented.
Bicycle Recommendation
Guidance
Yorba Linda currently has 35 miles of existing
bicycle facilities. Placentia has 21.3 miles of
existing bicycle facilities. Between both cities,
an additional 60 miles are recommended to
construct new or improved bikeways. Table 5
shows the mileage of proposed bikeways in
both cities.
78 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia74
This Plan will improve the bicycle network to
increase the number of people using active
transportation. The facilities recommended will
be safe and appropriate for the type of bicyclist
that will be using them. Some of the streets in
Yorba Linda and Placentia, such as Kraemer
Boulevard and Bastanchury Road, are most
appropriate for adult bicyclists who are highly
confident riding their bicycles. Safe facilities
were recommended with these bicyclists
in mind. In these cases, the recommended
facilities may not lower the level of traffic stress
enough to be comfortable for all bicyclists.
In other areas, such as on slower
neighborhood streets near schools, facilities
were chosen with families and school-aged
bicyclists in mind.
In Placentia, bikeway recommendation
emphasis was placed on creating north-south
and east-west connections throughout the City
and providing bikeway options separated from
motor vehicles. Yorba Linda has an extensive
existing off-street trail network that can be
used by bicyclists. Bikeway recommendations
in Yorba Linda were proposed to focus on
connections to these trails without significant
disruption to motor vehicle travel.
City Bikeway Class Existing Mileage Recommended Mileage Placentia Class I Shared-Use Path 0.9 2.0
Class II Bike Lanes 9.0 1.2
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane 0 5.4
Class III Bike Route 9.4 0
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard 0 7.2
Class IV Separated Bikeway 0 8.5
Placentia Total 21.3 Miles 24.3 Miles
Yorba Linda Class I Shared-Use Path 13.4 .4
Class II Bike Lanes 18.5 9.5
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane 0 3.9
Class III Bike Route 2.9 0
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard 0 12.9
Class IV Separated Bikeway .17 0
Yorba Linda Total 35.0 Miles 26.7 Miles
Combined City Totals 56.3 Miles 51 Miles
Table 5. Existing and Proposed Bikeway Mileage
79 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 75
Bicycle Recommendations Toolkit
Figure 24. Bicycle Facility Descriptions shows the facilities that were considered for the bicycle recommendations in this Plan. Each facility includes an example photo and a description of the facility’s applicability. Each colored circle around the photos continues in the recommendations maps.
Figure 24. Bicycle Facility Descriptions
CLASS I
Shared-Use Path
ºPaths completely separated from motor
vehicle traffic used by people walking
and biking.
ºComfortable for people of all ages and
abilities.
ºTypically located immediately adjacent
and parallel to a roadway or in its own
independent right-of-way, such as within a
park or along a body of water.
ºBike lanes with at least 5 feet of separation
from traffic vehicle lanes are also considered
shared-use paths.
CLASS IIB
Buffered Bicycle Lane
ºA dedicated lane for bicycle travel
separated from a motor vehicle travel lane
by a painted buffer.
ºThe buffer provides additional comfort
for users by providing space from
motor vehicles.
CLASS II
Bicycle Lane
ºA dedicated lane for bicycle travel
adjacent to a motor vehicle travel lane.
ºA painted white line separates the bicycle
lane from motor vehicle traffic.
80 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia76
CLASS IV
Separated Bikeway
ºAn on-street bikeway separated from
a motor vehicle travel lane by a curb,
median, planters, parked motor vehicles,
delineators, and/or other vertical elements.
CLASS IIIB
Bicycle Boulevard
ºA signed bike route that bicyclists share
with motor vehicles.
ºCan include pavement markings and traffic
calming features such as speed humps
and traffic diverters.
ºComfortable facility for cyclists who are
adept at riding with motor vehicles.
ºRecommended for streets with low vehicle
volumes and speeds.
81 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 77
Bicycle Intersection Treatments
The following includes brief descriptions of
various intersection treatments that can further
enhance connectivity and accessibility for
bicyclists. Final intersection configurations can
be determined in later design phases by Yorba
Linda and Placentia.
BIKE BOXES
A bike box is a designated area at the front of a
traffic lane, typically marked by a colored box,
which allows bicyclists to position themselves
ahead of cars at a red light. This helps improve
visibility and traffic flow, while reducing
conflicts when the light turns green.
BIKE CROSSINGS
A bike crossing is a designated, marked path
that guides bicyclists through an intersection,
often paired with signage to alert drivers to the
presence of bicyclists. These crossings are
useful in areas where dedicated bike lanes do
not extend through the intersection, helping
ensure bicyclists navigate safely and efficiently.
BIKE SIGNALS
Bike signals are specialized traffic signals,
often integrated with existing vehicular signals,
designed solely for those on bikes. Bike signals
typically include dedicated green light phases
or advanced green lights for bicyclists.
PROTECTED INTERSECTIONS
Protected intersections separate bicyclists
from motor vehicles with physical barriers or
dedicated space, minimizing potential conflicts
through high-traffic intersections.
TWO-STAGE TURN QUEUE BOXES
A two-stage turn queue box consists of a
waiting area for bicyclists to stop before
making a left or right turn, allowing them to
clear the intersection and proceed without
conflicts from other vehicles. These are
particularly helpful for bicyclists turning left
from a right-side bike facility at large signalized
intersections.
E-Bikes
The increased prevalence of technology such
as electric bicycles (“e-bikes”) and electric
scooters has introduced a new element
to active transportation and trail safety
considerations. While these options allow users
to travel further with less effort, these devices
can currently reach up to 28mph, particularly
in areas where e-bikes may be sharing spaces
with pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians.
Yorba Linda and Placentia will continue to
monitor, educate and enforce e-bike policies
as appropriate.
There are three classes of e-bikes:
CLASS I
Pedal-assisted bikes reaching up to 20mph
CLASS II
Low-speed throttle-assisted bikes reaching up
to 20mph
CLASS III
Speed pedal-assisted bikes reaching up to
28mph
82 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia78
Pedestrian
Recommendation
Guidance
Pedestrian infrastructure can help residents
safely and comfortably walk to their
destinations by providing them with designated
spaces separated from motor vehicles.
Pedestrian infrastructure such as sidewalks,
crossing facilities, curb treatments, and
traffic calming treatments can slow vehicles
and make walking feel safer. The pedestrian
infrastructure recommendations in this Plan
are intended to address critical gaps, and
focus on locations where infrastructure is
needed most, such as near schools, transit
stops, and other frequently visited destinations.
The recommendations seek to address the
most uncomfortable crossings and improve
connectivity within the pedestrian zones. The
recommended infrastructure was informed by
public comment and will improve pedestrian
connectivity to the most popular destinations
within the zones. As these zones become
more pedestrian oriented, denser land uses
can follow allowing for the development of
downtown commercial hubs within Yorba Linda
and Placentia.
Pedestrian Recommendations Toolkit
Figure 25. Pedestrian Facility Descriptions provides examples of pedestrian infrastructure recommended in this Plan.
Figure 25. Pedestrian Facility Descriptions
SIDEWALKS & PATHS
ºCompletely separated from motor vehicle
traffic.
ºUsed by people walking or using mobility
devices such as wheelchairs.
ºSidewalks are typically located
immediately adjacent and parallel to a
roadway. Shared-use paths can be located
in their own independent right-of-way, such
as within a park or along a body of water.
CROSSING FACILITIES
ºMake crossing the street at intersections
and midblock safer and more comfortable.
ºHigh -visibility crosswalk markings are more
visible to approaching vehicles and have
been shown to improve yielding behavior.
ºAdvance yield markings, or ”shark teeth,”
warn drivers they are approaching
a crosswalk.
83 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 79
CURB TREATMENTS
ºCurb ramps allow users of all abilities
to make the transition from the street to
the sidewalk. They are required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
at all crosswalks, including those that
are unmarked.
ºDirectional curb oriented to the crosswalk
are preferred, as they enable pedestrians
with limited vision to align with the crossing
while waiting to cross and when entering
the roadway.
TRAFFIC CALMING
ºEncourage drivers to travel at slower
speeds.
ºSome treatments alter the configuration
of a roadway, while others change how
drivers perceive and respond to a street.
ºCan be used at targeted locations
such as a busy intersection, or
along corridors.
BEACONS & SIGNALS
ºBeacons and signals both indicate to
drivers that someone may be crossing
the street.
ºMake crossing the street safer and more
comfortable.
ºPedestrian countdown signals create a
more predictable crossing environment
and give adequate warning to pedestrians
attempting to cross a roadway.
ºLeading pedestrian intervals allow a
pedestrian to begin crossing the street
before the traffic signal turns green.
84 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia80
Safe Routes to School
Safe Routes to School is an initiative that aims
to improve walking and biking conditions near
schools and to encourage students to use
active modes to get to and from school. The
goal of Safe Routes to School is to improve
kids’ safety and increase health and physical
activity. Successful Safe Routes to School
programs commonly include elements of each
of the five Es: Education, Encouragement,
Engineering, Evaluation, and Equity. Each E is
meant to remove barriers that prevent students
from walking and bicycling to school.
Safe Routes to School infrastructure is
important to provide safe, connected access
to schools for students, their families, and
all residents of Yorba Linda and Placentia.
The area within a half-mile radius around
each school was studied to make more
comprehensive recommendations to improve
Safe Routes to School. In-person walk audits
were completed for each of the study schools.
Audit findings were combined with the overall
recommendation approach to create a set of
recommendations for each school.
Safe Routes to School recommendations
are not separate from the bicycle and
pedestrian recommendations. Instead, many
of the recommendations in this chapter are
duplicated in both sections, as they work
together to create a robust network that
connects to multiple destinations.
Safe Routes to School recommendations
are included for each city after their
respective bicycle and pedestrian
recommendation section. Each project
school contains information about completed
walk audit findings and collision history.
Recommendations within a half mile of each
school are shown on each school’s map.
In addition to the recommendations shown for
each school, all schools received a detailed
school zone traffic control devices assessment.
This assessment reviewed the signage and
striping used near school campuses to verify
the devices comply with state regulations.
Signage, such as school zone signage, and
striping, such as at crosswalks, were reviewed
for considerations such as size, frequency, and
visibility. Details about this assessment can
be found in Appendix G: School Zone Traffic
Control Device Assessment Checklist.
PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING
ºImproves visibility for people walking, as
opposed to street lights intended to light
the roadway.
ºAdditional care and emphasis on
pedestrian lighting should be taken at and
near crosswalks.
85 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 81
Yorba Linda | Pedestrian Recommendations
Figure 26. Pedestrian Recommendations in Pedestrian Priority Zone: Yorba Linda Downtown, Yorba Linda 90 90
!
!
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!
!!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
ADAMS CEDARMO N TEREYREWOHNESIEYNNUSKAYEWEST HILLSUNSET LNL A UREL VI E
W
WEST TERRACE SOUTHERN POINTESHADY KN
L
ALICIA
TRUMAN
SUMMITLOGAN LINDANIAMNORCRIS ATINADDRY CREEK
NEWBURYFLOR
ARUTHSOUTHERN HILLS
BURKE
M A GEE AICNELAVOAK LEAF
Y ORBA L
N
SHOOK
G
A
R
D
E
N
LOS ALTOS LNTEDFORD WYV IA BUE N A VI D A
LINDFORDJOSHUA FREDRICKALLEZI
M
P
E
R
IA
L
VIA SE
R
E
N
OYELNIKCMAVOLINDAEIDNOCWIST
E
R
IA
MONSONTLEVESOORKENNEDYSEQUOIA
SHARON
P
A
R
K
PIPERCITNAIN
DNALHGIHTOWN CENTER
JAMAIC
A
TER
MELODYHUMMINGBIRD
LA CASITACARI
SIESTABEN LOMOND
EERT KAOARROYO
EVERGREENBOEING
HACIENDA
RIO DE ORO
RIO DE PLATANROCALOGAN VIEWTIKI TORC
H
LEMON ODACOVAAEHTRODLAGONDOU
G
LAS
SHOOK LNSHAW LNSCHOOLALEMACMO
U
NTAIN
V
I
E
W
HAVENPLUMOSAMARK
ADNILOLOS ALTOSDEBI
MANDARIN
ROCKY POINTDEVILLE
YORBA LINDA
LAKEVIEWLAKEVIEWORIENTE
BLAIR
ALTRUDY
EUREKAYORBA LINDA AND
PLACENTIA ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
City Boundaries
PEDESTRIAN ZONES
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
Recommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Raised Crosswalk
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
0 0.06 0.12 MILES
Pedestrian Priority Zone
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE:
YORBA LINDA DOWNTOWN
SRTS RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation
!Parking Restrictions
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Signage*
*School Advance Warning
Assembly D signage SW24-3
86 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia82
Yorba Linda | Bicycle Recommendations
Figure 27. Yorba Linda Bicycle Recommendations
Ä142
Ä241JEFFERSON STLEMON DR
PASEO DE LA CUMBRE
MARIPOSA AVE PASEO DEL PRADOEL CAJON AVE
BASTANCHU
R
Y
R
D
PALM STPLUMOSA DREASTPARK DRVALLEY VIEWBUENA VISTAAVE
ORIENTE DR
EUREKA AVECASA LOMA AVEROSE DRIVEWABASH AVE
SAVI RANCH PKWY
DOMINGUEZ RANCH RDP A S E O D E LAS PALOMASSANANTONIORDFAIRM ONTB LV D PROSPECT AVELAKEVIEWAVEVISTADELMARE S P E R A N Z A R DVILLAGECENTERDRChino Hills State Park
Santa Ana River
PLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
YORBA LINDA BICYCLE
RECOMMENDATIONS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
YORBA LINDA BIKE RECOMMENDATIONS
Class
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
IIB - Buffered Bike Lane
IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard
EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Class_Type
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
III - Bike Route
IV - Separated Bikeway
0 0.5 1 MILES
YORBA LINDA BLVD
Y
O
R
B
A LIN
D
A BLV
D
BIKEWAY TYPES
Class I
Shared Use Path Class II
Bike Lane
Class IIB
Buffered Bike Lane
Class IIIB
Bicycle Boulevard
C
A
MIN
O DE BRYA
N
TVIA LOMAS DE YORBA EPASEO DE LA CUMBRE
EASTPARK DRSAVI RANCH PKWY
Santa Ana River87
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 83
57 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
Ä57
Kraemer
Memorial
Park
Santa
Fe Park KRAEMER BLVDCRO W THER A VEBRADFORD AVEPLACENTIA AVEORANG E THORPE A VE CONCOR
D
WY
CHAPMAN AVE
ENCI
NI
TAS WAY
LAVENDER LN
ALTA STMARSEILLE DR
SAN
T
A
F
E
A
V
E
HAWAII WY SARA JANE LNCENTER ST
MONROE WYMAUI LNTWILIGHT STCAMARIL
LO STBO Y S E N B E R R Y L N
M E L O DY LN
WALNUT AVEMELROSE STMAIN STMURRAY STWILSON AVE
FRONTAGE RDMASSACHUSETTS LNSANTE FE CT
I N DU
STRI
AL WAYSTARDUST STHU N D LEY
STR
ADCLI F F E A V E
FRA N K L I N D R
LANAI LNSUNRISE STANGELINA DRANNED DRL ANCASTER AVE
RUTHERFORD RDKIMBER L Y A VE
NUTWOOD AVE
HARMONY LN
DEREK DREVE CIR
CARDINAL ST
PARTRIDGE STKAUAI LNVENTURA AVE
SANDPIPE
R A VE
SUNSET DR
OLIVE ST
PORTER WYBACKS LN
BAKER ST
CAPISTRANO STKENSING T ON A VESANTA BARBARA STRAMONA ST KENT STMEADOWLARK LNPHEASANT STTEMPLE STKraemer
Middle
Valencia High
Valadez Middle
School
Academy
PEDESTRIAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
Old Town Placentia Streetscape
Master Plan Area
PEDESTRIAN ZONE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Refuge Island
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
Pedestrian Priority Zone
SRTS RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Stop Warrant
!Yield Markings
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
Chapman and Kraemer
Placentia
Placentia | Pedestrian Recommendations
Figure 28. Pedestrian Recommendations in Pedestrian Priority Zone: Chapman and Kraemer, Placentia 88 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia84
Figure 29. Pedestrian Recommendations in Pedestrian Priority Zone: McFadden Park !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
Ä91
Ä57PLACENTIA AVEMELROSE STCRO W THER A VE
MOISI LNORANG E THORPE A VE
LAWRENCE AVE
PARADISE STBLUE GUM STL A JOL L A ST
B O Y S E N B E R R Y L N
P O R T E R W Y
MIRA L O M A W A Y
BRIARVALE AVE DUNN WAYL A CRES T A A VEEAST P ARK LN FASHION LNI ND
USTRI
AL WAYREGAL P ARK DR
S
U
N
S
H
I
N
E
W
YOHIO
AVETERR A CE ST
D A LY ST BUCCANEER DRK A N S A S A V E
CYPRESS STWALLGREEN STBALSAM AVE
KIMBERLY AVE
MISSOURI A VE
M IR A L O M A A V E
ROMNEYA DR
IO
WA PLTAFOLLA ST
CORO N ADO ST
TS TSIKNUSVAN HORN WYHUNDLEY WAYARNOLD DRLAWRENCE STAVE DE PIO PICO
GR E T T A LN
VIA BURTON RED GUM STTEMPLE STMelrose
Elementary
Valadez
Middle School
Academy
PEDESTRIAN
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
Parks
School Property
Old Town Placentia Streetscape
Master Plan Area
PEDESTRIAN ZONE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Refuge Island
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Signage*
*No Right Turn On Red (R10-11)
Sidewalk Improvements
Pedestrian Priority Zone
SRTS RECOMMENDATIONSRecommendation
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Signage*
*SR4-1
!Speed Feedback Sign
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
0 0.07 0.15 MILES
McFadden Park
Placentia
89 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 85
Placentia | Bicycle Recommendations
Figure 30. Placentia Bicycle Recommendations
Ä142
Ä57
Ä90 VALLEY VIEW CIR
MELROSE STCRO W THER A VE
YORBA LINDA BLVD TS OIHOVALLEY VIEW AVEJEFFERSON STRUBY DR DVLB EERFFUTBUENA VISTA AVE
BRADFORD AVEPLACENTIA AVEDR DLEIFHCIRGOLDEN AVE
ALTA VISTA ST TS NERUB NAVCHAPMAN AVEEVA AICNELAVALA
M
O LNDVLB REMEARKEVA ODACOVAEVA NEVAHKOORBVI A R O M A
SANTA FE AVE GRANDVIEW AVEPALM AVEBASTANCHURY RD
MADISON AVE
ORANGETHORPE AVE PLUMOSA DRHIGHLAND AVEROSE DRSOMERSET DR
FOXFIELD LNMORSE AVE SPAHN LNSAGA DR
ORANGE DR
LAKEVIEW AVESUNMIST DRSHO
RT ST
VIA RODEOPROSPECT AVEMIRALOMA AVE EVA AKERUEWABASH AVE
KELLOGG DREL CAJON AVE
ANGELINA DRLEMON DR
PALM DR
L A JOL L A ST CASA LOMA AVERD REMAH2ND STP O R T E R WYWALNUT ST
RD NELTRACMERIENDA LNORIENTE DR
FEE ANA STTUSTIN AVEChino Hills
State Park
Santa Ana RiverPLACENTIA
YORBA LINDA
PLACENTIA BICYCLE
RECOMMENDATIONS
YORBA LINDA - PLACENTIA
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION
PLAN
BOUNDARIES
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
PLACENTIA BIKE RECOMMENDATIONS
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
IIB - Buffered Bike Lane
IIIB - Bicycle Boulevard
IV - Separated Bikeway
EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
Class_Type
I - Shared-Use Path
II - Bike Lane
III - Bike Route
IV - Separated Bikeway
0 0.35 0.7 MILES
90 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia86
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
91 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 87
The following section presents information
about walk audit findings and collision history
near each school. Recommendations within a
quarter mile of each school are shown on each
school’s map.
*Glenknoll Elementary School is located in
Unincorporated Orange County. It is listed
here due to its proximity to Yorba Linda,
however any recommendations will need to be
coordinated with Orange County Public Works
for implementation.
Yorba Linda | Safe Routes to
School Recommendations
This Plan evaluates all 12 Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School District schools in
Yorba Linda:
1. Bernardo Yorba Middle School
2. Bryant Ranch Elementary School
3. Fairmont Elementary School
4. Glenknoll Elementary School*
5. Lakeview Elementary School
6. Linda Vista Elementary School
7. Mabel M. Paine Elementary School
8. Rose Drive Elementary School
9. Travis Ranch School
10. Van Buren Elementary School
11. Yorba Linda High School
12. Yorba Linda Middle School
92 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia88
Bike lane and 40-mph speed limit along Fairmont
Boulevard in front of Bernardo Yorba Middle
School
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"5350 Fairmont Blvd., Yorba Linda,
CA 92886
ºGrades: 7–8
º2023 Enrollment: 556
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
A high-visibility crosswalk was recommended
on the north leg of Futura Drive/Manor View
Drive to alert drivers that pedestrians may be
in the area.
A leading pedestrian interval (LPI) at Fairmont
Boulevard/Old Ranch Road will provide
pedestrians with additional crossing time.
Bernardo Yorba Middle School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºSpeeding appears prevalent along
Fairmont Boulevard, which includes hilly
and winding topography and several
school crossings Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions..
ºStudents are crossing at Futura Drive
at Manor View Drive, which presents
possible conflicts with vehicles exiting the
parking lot.
ºBack trails and neighborhood
streets offer significant active travel to
school opportunities.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision within
a quarter mile of the school.
93 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 89
Figure 31. Bernardo Yorba Middle School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
FUTURA
LLIHKOORBLYNNBROOK PLAZAPASEO JOAQUINVI
A ANGEL
I
NAPARKHURSTENIPULVIA
MARIA
AMBERDALEKINGSBRIARBLUEFIELD
SHADY GLENOLD RANCH
HIL L COCK VIEW
PASEO LUISVIA ADELAOAK MEADOWV IA N A T ALIE
F
AIRMO
NTPASEO GILBERTOVI
A SARAVISTA MONTANAVIA MONITARIDGEWOOD PASEO ARNALDOVIA VIR G
I
N
IA
VISTA LAGUNAMANOR VIEWLYNRIDGEDUNSMUIR
LE M ANS
PASEO DE LAS PALO M ASMARYNELLBURLEIGH
Kingsbriar
Park
Bernardo
Yorba
Middle
Fairmont
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Bernardo Yorba Middle
Yorba Linda
!Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)!
94 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia90
Vehicle queuing during dismissal time
Bryant Ranch Elementary School
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"24695 Paseo De Toronto, Yorba Linda,
CA
ºGrades: TK–5
º2023 Enrollment: 570
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends implementing traffic
calming measures along Paseo De Toronto
in front of the school to slow down traffic,
particularly for vehicles traveling downhill.
To prevent drivers from entering through the
exit lane at the northern parking lot, the existing
Do Not Enter signage should be enlarged to
ensure it is visible to drivers.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºSome vehicles have been observed
disregarding signage and entering through
the exit lane. Improving sign visibility and
limiting exiting traffic to right turns only may
improve compliance.
ºVehicle queuing during dismissal
creates possible pedestrian crossing
conflicts.
ºSpeeding appears prevalent along
Paseo De Toronto, while hilly and winding
topography limits sight distance. Traffic
calming and speed management
strategies should be considered. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
ºRear access through Woods Fields could
help alleviate pick-up pressure on Paseo
De Toronto.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
95 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 91
Figure 32. Bryant Ranch Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !VIA CANTADAPATRICIAPASEO DE T ORO N T O
LAS PATRANAS
VIA BUENA SUERTENICOLE
CAMINO FAMOSAETACET ONIMACVIA NUEVA CAMINO DE BESARL OS ADORNOS
V I A MELIN D A
IRONSTONE
L OS ES T ADOS
VIA LOMAS DE YORBA EASTVIA VALLARTACAMINO PONIENTEC
A
M
D
E
B
R
Y
A
N
T
CAMINO DORADOABBEY
G
L
E
N
LOS RIOSL OS MO N TEROS
Chino Hills State
Park
Bryant
Ranch
Park
Las Brisas
Park
Bryant Ranch
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!Signage*
Traffic Calming
Recommendation*Enlarge existing Do Not Enter
Exit Only sign at school driveway
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Bryant Ranch Elementary
Yorba Linda
96 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia92
Fairmont Elementary School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends implementing a
high-visibility crosswalk and leading pedestrian
interval (LPI) at the Fairmont Boulevard/Yorba
Linda Boulevard intersection. The high-visibility
crosswalk and LPI will enhance safety of
pedestrians by increasing their visibility
to drivers.
A sidewalk and bike lane near Fairmont
Elementary
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºThe intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard
and Fairmont Boulevard is a major
intersection with many students crossing
it. Though four crossing guards are staffed
here, traffic calming can enhance
crossing comfort.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been four pedestrian collisions and
two bicycle collisions within a quarter mile of
the school. One of the pedestrian collisions,
which occurred at the intersection of Fairmont
Boulevard and Lorca Lane, was fatal, though
this collision occurred at night, outside of
school hours.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"5241 Fairmont Blvd., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 809
97 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 93
Figure 33. Fairmont Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!!
FUTURAYORBA VISTAEASY
STONE CANYONCARMONITASA
N
D
S
P
O
I
NT FAIRMONTWEST KNOLLPASATIEMPOSHADOW HILL OLLAPARORLANDOESCALONAL OMBAR D Y
D
O
R
A
L ONAILAWENDOVERLOGANA
SUMAC RIDGEPARK RIDGE
NOVA
YORBA LINDA
W A GON WHEELWILLOWBROOK
MICKEL LN
MARYNELLLYNRIDGEKELLOGGKENTWATERMAJORCA
VENECIA
LE MANS
VILLAGERGRANADA
BURLEIGH
CAPRICE
Gun Club
Road
Linear
Park
Fairmont
Knolls ParkSAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!High Visibility Crosswalk
Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
Existing Trails
!
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Fairmont Elementary
Yorba Linda
98 Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia94
Glenknoll Elementary School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºSome cars fail to yield to pedestrians
at intersections adjacent to Glenknoll
Elementary. These intersections would be
improved by additional all-way stop sign
and high-visibility crosswalks compared to
current yield signs.
ºSome parents waiting to pick up double
park on Glenknoll Drive and Larkridge
Drive, where the two parking lots are
located. Double-parked cars create
possible vehicle-pedestrian conflicts.
ºObservers witnessed through traffic using
the opposing lane to pass double-parked
cars during dismissal.
ºSome students and parents cross in
between traffic on Glenknoll Drive and
Larkridge Drive. Safety would be
improved by adding midblock crossings
directly connecting to Glenknoll
Elementary’s driveways.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"6361 Glenknoll Dr., Unincorporated
Orange County, CA 92886
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 410
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Glenknoll Elementary School is located in
Unincorporated Orange County. The following
recommendations will need to be
coordinated with Orange County Public Works
for implementation.
Stop sign studies should be conducted for the
intersections of Fairlynn Boulevard/Crestknoll
Drive (where there is an existing crossing
guard), Crestknoll Drive/Glenknoll Drive, and
Larkridge Drive/Glenknoll Drive. The County
will conduct traffic, pedestrian, and bicycle
counts to determine if stop signs and/or a
crossing guard can be warranted for these
intersections. Implementing stop signs at these
locations can create controlled intersections
that are safer for pedestrians to cross to reach
the school.
Implementing a “no left turn” restriction from
the street into the school parking lots on
Larkridge Drive and on Glenknoll Drive during
school hours can reduce conflicts between
vehicles and crossing pedestrians, as well as
minimize vehicles backing up. The County will
work with the Operations and Maintenance
team to install proper signage.
Enforcing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions at the intersections of Fairlynn
Boulevard/Crestknoll Drive, Crestknoll Drive/
Glenknoll Drive, and Larkridge Drive/Glenknoll
Drive can provide drivers, pedestrians, and
cyclists with a better view of the intersections.
School staff is encouraged to contact the
OC Sheriff Department when enforcement is
needed. The County will evaluate if additional
daylighting restrictions are needed.
99 RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 95
A high-visibility crosswalk on the east leg and
an ADA-compliant curb ramp at the southwest
corner of Fairlynn Boulevard/ Crestknoll
Drive will bridge gaps between sidewalks
and enhance mobility for people of all ages
and abilities. The County will conduct a
crosswalk study to determine if the crosswalk
is appropriate. The ADA curb ramp will only
be implemented should there be future street
improvements, as-to not alter the existing
residential driveway.
The County will consider adding centerline
striping to Crestknoll Drive to act as traffic
calming.
Cars on Larkridge Drive waiting to enter the school
parking lot
100
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia96
Figure 34. Glenknoll Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 90 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
Ä90
G
O
L
D
E
N
G
A
T
ENOB HILLSTONEHURSTPALMALAM
P
P
O
S
T
PALAMINOBRIDLEMOSELLE RIDGE
M ANOR
CLEAR
RI
V
E
RACACIA
WAVE
R
LY G
L
E
N
WOODS
TOCK
RIVE R VIEW
FAIR
LYNNWINFIE
L
DKAMEHAGRACE HAVENTANGLEWOODROYAL OAKGLEN F
A
I
RM
O
N
T
ACACIA HILLOAKVALE
KINGSB
R IAR
CANYON
WHITE SPRINGGLENHAVENHILLSIDE
B
R
O
O
K
M
O
N
T
LARKRIDGE
FE
R
N
G
L
E
N
OLIVE BRANCHH
I
L
L
T
O
P
CRESTKNOLLBENT WOOD
LINDAFAIR AMBERDALEGLENDALEI
M
P
E
R
IA
L GLENKNOLLKingsbriar
ParkBrookmont
Park
Glenknoll
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Parking Restrictions
!Signage*
!Stop Warrant
Recommendation
Existing Trails
*No Left Turn during
School Hours signage R33
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Glenknoll Elementary
Unincorporated County
101
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 97
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
102
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia98
Lakeview Elementary School
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"17510 Lakeview Ave., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
ºGrades: TK–5
º2023 Enrollment: 416
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
at Lakeview Avenue/Valley View Avenue to
high-visibility crosswalks would bridge gaps
between sidewalks and alert drivers that
pedestrians may be in the area.
Rear student loading area on Brooklyn
Avenue
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºThe front gate of the school near the busy
intersection of Valley View Avenue and
Lakeview Avenue is currently closed.
ºImproved trail connectivity would also help
reduce scaling of fences by students trying
to get to school from trails.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
103
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 99
Figure 35. Lakeview Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
LOS ANGELES
E
D
G
EW
O
O
D
C
L
O
V
E
R
D
A
L
E
DENVEROAK HILLVALLEY VIE
W
HARLAN
DRAKE
BIDWELL
PACIFICJEFFREY
ODRACIRFREMONT
NOTLRACLAKEVIEW
JENNIFER
LA CONCETTAAMOL ASACRIDGEDALE
BRIARDALE
MARDA
CHESTNUT
2NDBROOKLYN
CHICAGO
WALNUT
Lakeview
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!High Visibility Crosswalk
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Lakeview Elementary
Yorba Linda
VALLEY VIEW104
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia100
Parents drop off their students on Linda Verde
Street; the loading area is defined by traffic cones
Linda Vista
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºDrivers have been observed making illegal
left turns from Linda Verde Street onto Ohio
Street and from Ohio Street onto Linda
Verde Street. Limited visibility of the no-left-
turn signs are a possible cause.
ºMany parents drop off their students in
front of the two gates on Linda Verde
Street. Formalized loading areas near
the gates on Linda Verde Street would
be helpful.
ºSome parents drop off their students in
the parking lot of the church across Linda
Verde Street, and their students cross
Linda Verde Street at midblock locations.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision within
a quarter mile of the school on Ohio Street near
the school driveway.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"5600 Ohio St., Yorba Linda, CA 92886
ºGrades: TK–5
º2023 Enrollment: 371
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Sign improvements include upgrading the
existing “no left turn” signs at the intersection
of Ohio Street/Linda Verde Street to make them
more visible, and installing new “no U-turn”
signs to reduce illegal turning movements at
Linda Verde Street where the road widens.
To improve safety for students who access
the school via Linda Verde Street, the Plan
proposes formalizing student loading areas
along Linda Verde Street near the school gate
by adding curb paintings and student loading
zone signs.
Enforcing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions and installing high visibility
crosswalks at the intersection of Linda Verde
Street/Grandview Avenue can provide drivers,
pedestrians, and cyclists with a better view of
the intersection.
Connecting sidewalk gaps on Buena Vista
Avenue from Ohio Street to the OC Loop/El
Cajon Trail can encourage students to walk
and bike to and from school by using the trail.
105
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 101
Figure 36. Linda Vista Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 90 !
!
!!BLUEBERRYV
A
L
E
SUN
NY SLOPE
CT
FORBES
SU
N
NYVIE
W
ARROYO CAJON
ALAMO
L
NLAKE SHOREWH ITE O AK
OHIOLI
N
D
A
V
E
R
D
E
KELLOGGSANDRALOO K OUT TAMARISKPEBBLE BEACHSHAM
R
O
C
K
COU
NTRY CLUB
ED
G
E
C
L
I
F
F
RIDGECHERRYLEEFIRC
R
E
S
T
SHO
RTLAKEHAVEN MO
U
NTAIN
V
I
E
W
BUENA VISTA
IMPER
I
ALGRANDVIEWGRA
N
DVIE
W
AV E
X
TSCENIC
V
IEW OHIOPhillip S. Paxton
Equestrian Center
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!Parking Restrictions
!Signage*
Recommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
Existing Trails
*Enhance existing No Left Turn R33
and No U-Turn signage R3-4
!High Visibility Crosswalk
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Linda Vista Elementary
Yorba Linda
106
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia102
Mabel M. Paine Elementary School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends connecting sidewalk
gaps along Plumosa Drive to provide people
with a safer space to travel and reduce conflicts
between pedestrians and moving vehicles.
Enforcing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions at the residential intersections near
the school and the school driveway exits on
Plumosa Drive can provide drivers, pedestrians,
and cyclists with a better view of
the intersections.
Installing an RRFB at Plumosa Drive/Cari Lane,
along with advanced yield signs and high-
visibility crosswalks at Plumosa Drive/Piper
Place and Plumosa Drive/Cari Lane and the
existing crossing guard, will alert drivers to the
presence of those crossing and prompt them to
slow down.
Figure 37. Mabel M. Paine Elementary School Safe
Routes to School Recommendations There are gaps in the sidewalk network around the school
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºDesignated walking spaces and crossing
locations on Plumosa Drive are limited.
Additionally, cars are often parked too
close to the intersections surrounding
Mabel M. Paine Elementary, which creates
potential access and sight distance issues.
Connecting sidewalk gaps and enforcing
intersection daylighting could improve
safety in the area.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision
resulting in severe injury within a quarter mile
of the school on Hills Way.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"4444 Plumosa Dr., Yorba Linda,
CA 92886
ºGrades: TK–5
º2023 Enrollment: 373
107
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 103
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!PIPER WEST HILLMAIN
GARNER
QUIET MEADOWWEST TERRACE SOUTHERN POINTEAVOLINDA
ALICIALOGAN LINDABLAZING STARELSIEGOLDBARK HEADSTALL
WILD GING
E
R
SOUTHERN HILLSSUNNY
G
A
R
D
E
N
ARBOR G ATE
CANYON CAROLMOLLIE
POPPYSHARONMARK AVOCADO GROVECARI
DEBI BOEINGORIENTE
I
M
P
E
R
IA
L KAYERIO DE ORO
RIO DE PLATA
LORI
LOGAN VIEWAICNELAVSCHOOLEVORG SURTICALTRUDY
MANDARIN LAKEVIEWBASTANCHURY
PLUMOSAMabel M.
Paine
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!Parking Restrictions
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Signage*
Recommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
Pedestrian Priority Zone
Existing Trails
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE
!
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
High Visibility Crosswalk
*School Advance Warning
Assembly D signage SW24-3
!High Visibility Crosswalk
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Mabel M. Paine Elementary
Yorba Linda
108
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia104
A crosswalk crossing Rose Drive in front of
the school
Rose Drive
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºCrossing time on Rose Drive was observed
to be too short for the relatively wide road.
Insufficient pedestrian clearance also
creates backup in the parking lot for exiting
cars. Configuring a leading pedestrian
interval and lengthening the interval overall
would help improve clearance.
ºDrivers appear to be speeding on Rose
Drive, while there are narrow sidewalks and
a lack of comfortable biking infrastructure.
Further investigation is required to
assesses the impact on street parking
and right-of-way if considering widening
sidewalks with buffer zones and installing
protected bike lanes. These measures
could improve comfort and safety for active
travelers while also providing improved
connectivity to the El Cajon Trail.
ºAdding a direct access point from El
Cajon Trail to Rose Drive Elementary could
improve connectivity and encourage more
walking and biking to school. Further
investigation for feasibility is needed.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of
the school. Both collisions occurred on
Madison Avenue.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"4700 N Rose Dr., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
ºGrades: TK–5
º2023 Enrollment: 367
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends sidewalk widening
along Rose Drive from Yorba Linda Boulevard
to El Cajon Trail to provide a more comfortable
and safer walking environment for pedestrians.
High-visibility crosswalks and intersection
daylighting are recommended along Rose
Drive at multiple residential intersections to
increase pedestrian visibility and enhance
crossing safety.
109
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 105
Figure 38. Rose Drive Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !!!!VISTAVISTA RANCHSAGANHAPS
GEMPRENTISSCRESTA BELLACAMILLE
SHERWOOD VILLAGE CIRMALCOLMHERITAGEHUGGI
N
SMIMOSATSERCNOL
REGULUSYRUBHSALIBERTY
ORANGE
ARIESNAENAEJLIBRALAROVERNASPAHN LNKONA KOVECAMILLE PL
PROSPECTLESALAVELLHILLCREST
P
A
L
OM
IN
O
EL CAJON
RANCHO
MEADOWVIEW
YAWKOORBROSEOAKHURST
LOIE
NIGHTINGALE
Rose Drive
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Parking Restrictions
RecommendationSidewalk Improvements
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Rose Drive Elementary
Yorba Linda
110
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia106
Travis Ranch School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends implementing traffic
calming measures, such as speed humps and
speed cushions, along Vía De La Escuela and
Dominguez Ranch Road to slow down traffic.
Further studies will be conducted prior to the
implementation of any traffic
calming measures.
High-visibility crosswalks are proposed along
Vía De La Escuela and Dominguez Ranch
Road at multiple residential streets to bridge
gaps between sidewalks and alert drivers that
pedestrians may be in the area.
Improving trail connections on the west side
of the school will provide safe walking routes
separated from road traffic.
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
to high-visibility crosswalks at Dominguez
Ranch Road/Vía De La Escuela can enhance
pedestrian safety at these wide intersections. Walking trails connect Travis Ranch School to Travis Ranch Youth Park
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºSpeeding appears prevalent on Yorba
Linda Boulevard, Via De La Escuela, and
Dominguez Ranch Road despite significant
student presence and sight distance
limitations due to topography.
Traffic calming measures could mitigate
these issues. Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions.
ºInstalling high-visibility wayfinding signs
and paving the unpaved section of the trail
that runs along Dominguez Ranch Road
would provide improved access to the
loading area at Travis Ranch Youth Park.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"5200 Vía De La Escuela, Yorba Linda,
CA 92887
ºGrades: TK–8
º2023 Enrollment: 1,227
111
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 107
Figure 39. Travis Ranch School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!!
!
!!!!!!
!
VIA
D
IA
N
ZA
VIA MARIPOSAAL LON BY
VIA DEL PARQUEVIA DEL GAVILAN WH I TE W A TER
WESTFIELD
P O T O M A C
V IA ALISA
STONEHAVENJOANNEM A CKENZIE
DUNROBIN
CLEAR W ATER
TODD
FE ATHER
CIRCULO NUEVO
V I A DEL CUE R V O
C
L
E
S
O
N
O
R
A
VIA
V
I
C
E
N
TE VIA DE LA ESCUELAV
I
A
B
E
R
N
A
R
D
O
VI A COTA
ROANOKEA VENI D A ADOBECALLE SONORA
VIA DEL HA LCON
PORTAGEYORBA LINDADominguez Trailside Park
Travis Ranch
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!Curb Extension
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Parking Restrictions
Off-street Path Improvements
Existing Trails
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Travis Ranch
Yorba Linda
112
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia108
Van Buren Elementary School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºMany students cross midblock at Van
Buren Street and Glasgow Circle.
ºDuring morning arrival, congestion spills
into Van Buren Street from the school’s
parking lot, blocking passing traffic.
ºDrivers along Van Buren Street will
maneuver between cars waiting to enter
the parking lot and the sidewalk (Van
Buren Street is one travel lane each
direction). This creates potential conflicts.
ºSome drivers were observed making illegal
U-turns on Van Buren Street.
ºSome students were dropped off at a
red curb on Van Buren Street. One driver
parked their car at the red curb and walked
their student to the school’s entrance.
ºThe crossing guard said drivers
speed along Van Buren Street during
free-flow conditions.
ºFire hydrants and utility poles and boxes
create obstructions for pedestrians on Van
Buren Street.
ºThe frontage road of Van Buren Elementary
falls within Yorba Linda’s jurisdiction.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have not been any bicycle or pedestrian
collisions within a quarter mile of the school
during the study years.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"1245 N Van Buren St., Placentia, CA
92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 571
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
High-visibility crosswalks are proposed
along Van Buren Street at multiple residential
streets to bridge gaps between sidewalks and
alert drivers that pedestrians may be in the
area. This Plan also recommends upgrading
the existing standard crosswalks to high-
visibility crosswalks on all legs at Yorba Linda
Boulevard/Van Buren Street.
The segment on the west side of Van Buren
Street from Calgary Avenue to Glasgow Circle
is a no-parking zone during school hours.
Much of this area has red painted curbs except
for a small segment on the west side of Van
Buren Street south of Calgary Avenue. Filling
in this small gap with red curb will further
reinforce the no-parking restriction in front of
the school.
A Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFB)
is recommended for the north leg of the
Jefferson Street/Carlsbad Street intersection
to alert drivers to the presence of students and
prompt them to slow down. This RRFB would
be located in the City of Placentia.
Many intersections near the school lack painted
crosswalks
113
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 109
Figure 40. Van Buren Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Saratoga Park
Van Buren
YORBA LINDA
PLACENTIA
Elementary
SEQUOIA AVETS NOSREFFEJCASCADES AVERD DNALEROMTSEWLASTERBROOK STCUMBERLAND CIR
YORBA LINDA BLVD
TS LOOPREVILLAWNDALE PL WEBB PLRD DNALTURHILLWOOD DR
MELBOURNE LNDURHAM DR
COVENTRY LN
YORKSHIRE AVE
SAO PAULO AVE
MONTEVIDEO AVE
N JEFFERSON STCARLSBAD STCASA ORO DRBRIARHILL DRVAN BUREN STLA COLLETTE PL
HILLWOOD PL
CALGARY AVE
YELLOWSTONE
AVE
MESA VERDE
CIR
BRYCE CIR
ZION AVE
YELLOWSTONE AVECARLSBAD ST
OLYMPIC AVE
STAFFORD
CIR
GLASGOW
CIR
HILLWOOD DR
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries*
*The frontage road of Van Buren
Elementary falls within Yorba
Linda’s jurisdiction.
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
Parking Restrictions
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Van Buren Elementary
Yorba Linda
114
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia110
The school parking exits across the bike lane
along Bastanchury Road
Yorba Linda High School
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
to high-visibility crosswalks can enhance
pedestrian safety at Bastanchury Road/
Fairmont Blvd.
A speed feedback sign on Bastanchury
Road between Princeton Place and Fairmont
Boulevard will help prevent speeding on
this route to school, especially for cars
traveling downhill.
The City is in the process of conducting a
study for a new traffic signal at Fairmont
Boulevard/ Avenida Del Rey. If the signal is
warranted, crossing infrastructure can be
considered at this intersection.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºVehicle speeds on Bastanchury Road
appear to be high, creating uncomfortable
biking experience for people who bike on
the existing Class II bike lane.
ºSidewalk widening and shade trees
would improve pedestrian comfort along
Bastanchury Road.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle collision within
a quarter mile of the school on Bastanchury
Road near the school driveway.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"19900 Bastanchury Rd., Yorba Linda,
CA 92886
ºGrades: 9–12
º2023 Enrollment: 1,697
115
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 111
Figure 41. Yorba Linda High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!25
!25
!!
LIVORN
O
B
AY
L
ORBROWNPRINC
ETONCASI
ANOVERONACORNELL VILLA BER
G
A
M
O
PENN
VILLA VALENTEVIA DEL PRADOSEG OVIA
D
U
K
E
M A L A GA
RAVEN N AY
A
L
E
BASTANCHURY
GRANADAVILLA MEDI
C
I
CAMAROSA
VIA D
E
LAS
M
O
NTANAS
AVE
D
E
L
R
E
YAVENIDA DE LAS FLORESVIA DE LAAMOLAPFAIRMONTGun
Club
Road
Linear Park
Yorba
Linda High
School
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation
!Signage*
!25 Speed Feedback Sign
Existing Trails
!On- Campus Signage**
*School Zone signage SW21-1
** Please Pull Forward signage
!Traffic Signal Warrant
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
Yorba Linda High
Yorba Linda
116
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia112
Yorba Linda Middle School
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"4777 Casa Loma Ave., Yorba Linda, CA
92886
ºGrades: 6–8
º2023 Enrollment: 772
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Enhancing the existing crossings at Casa
Loma Avenue/Christie Drive and the existing
midblock crossing at the El Cajon Trail with
ADA-compliant curb ramps and advanced
yield markings will improve accessibility and
safety for pedestrians.
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks
to high-visibility crosswalks at Casa Loma
Avenue/Imperial Highway (State Route 90) will
alert drivers that pedestrians may be in the
area and enhance connectivity between the
two segments of El Cajon Trail.While many intersections along Casa Loma Avenue do not have marked crosswalks,
students can cross via the high-visibility
crosswalk at Christie Drive
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºCasa Loma Avenue currently has just
one crosswalk.
ºImproving access to the El Cajon Trail
would enhance connectivity to the school
and to Hurless Barton Park.
ºYorba Linda Boulevard is a heavily
trafficked six-lane road. Pedestrian
comfort at the intersection of Casa Loma
Avenue and Yorba Linda Boulevard could
be enhanced with leading pedestrian
intervals, high-visibility crosswalks, and the
installation of a second crosswalk at the
east end of the intersection crossing Yorba
Linda Boulevard.
ºImproved access to the school through
Veterans Sports Park would encourage
more active travel.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of
the school on Imperial Highway (State Route
90). The pedestrian collision resulted in a
severe injury.
117
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 113
Figure 42. Yorba Linda Middle School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 90 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
MO N TEREYIM
P
E
R
IAL
HEID
E
RICHFIELDM
I
S
T
Y
TSERCDOOWORANGE
DEBI
AVOLINDA
WOODHAVENWORKING
LADERA
LOOPREVILOAK LEAF
LEMONWOBNIARJEANJAMESTOWN
JOSHUAELMHURST CIR
WIST
E
R
IASEQUOIA EUREKAACORNEL CAJON
BATESPEACHTREEDELANCYROCKY POINTCHRISTIE
SUNWEST CIR
MEADOWVIEWCASA LOMALERENEWEIV YELLAVVeterans Park
Yorba
Linda
Middle
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
City Boundaries
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Yield Markings
RecommendationSidewalk Improvements
Pedestrian Priority Zone
Existing Trails
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Existing Crossing Guard Locations
PEDESTRIAN PRIORITY ZONE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Signals
Yorba Linda Middle
Yorba Linda
118
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia114
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
119
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 115
Placentia | Safe Routes to School Recommendations
5. El Camino Real Continuation High School
6. El Dorado High School
7. George Key School (campus shared with
Golden Elementary School)
8. Golden Elementary School (campus
shared with George Key School)
9. John O. Tynes Elementary School
10. Kraemer Middle School
11. Melrose Elementary School
This Active Transportation Plan evaluates all 16
Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District
schools in Placentia. The list of the study
schools is as follows.
1. Brookhaven Elementary School
2. Charles Wagner Elementary School
3. Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School (campus
shared with Parkview School)
4. Parkview School (campus shared with Col.
J. K. Tuffree Middle School)
12. Morse Elementary School
13. Ruby Drive Elementary School
14. Sierra Vista Elementary School
15. Valadez Middle School Academy
16. Valencia High School
The following section presents information
about completed walk audit findings
and collision history near each school.
Recommendations within a quarter mile of
each school are shown on each school’s map.
120
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia116
Long driveways and limited sight distances
present possible vehicle-pedestrian conflicts
Brookhaven Elementary School
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 450
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends upgrading the
crosswalk to a raised crosswalk at the existing
midblock crossing in front of the school on
Brookhaven Avenue. This improvement can
increase safety by alerting drivers about the
crossing students and slowing down vehicular
travel speed.
Improving the sidewalk on Brookhaven Avenue
from Bastanchury Road to Brower Avenue and
enhancing driveway crossings can ensure
students arrive at the school safely.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Bastanchury
Road/Brookhaven Avenue will bridge gaps
between sidewalks and enhance mobility for
people of all ages and abilities, especially
those with disabilities, people with strollers,
and the elderly.
A speed feedback sign on Bastanchury Road
between Kraemer Boulevard and Brookhaven
Avenue will help prevent speeding on this route
to school.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºNarrow sidewalks and curb cuts
are present, creating possible
accessibility limitations.
ºSpeeding appears prevalent along
Bastanchury Road, which includes a single
crossing guard. Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions.
ºImprovement of crossings, including
midblock on Brookhaven Avenue, across
the driveway entrances, and across
Bastanchury Road, offer potential
safety gains.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been five bicycle collisions and
one pedestrian collision within a quarter mile
of the school, one of which resulted in a severe
injury. Most of these collisions occurred on
Bastanchury Road.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"1851 Brookhaven Ave., Placentia, CA
92870
121
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 117
Figure 43. Brookhaven Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !25
!
!
!
!
!!
!TS EKONAORS W A N S O N A V E
DVLB REMEARKDR NOTSGNIKSOMERSET DR
GILLILAN ST
WILLAMETTE AVE
LIVINGSTON AVE
PATRICIAN LN
EVA AICNELAVTS ESWORPTS DEEWTTS ORODOETE BASTANCHURY RD
BROWER AVE
SARAH AVE
E BORROMEO AVE
HUDSON AVEFEATHER AVEALLEGHENY AVEBROOKHAVEN AVEEl Dorado High
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Raised Crosswalk
Speed Feedback Sign
Sidewalk Improvements
!25
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Brookhaven Elementary
Placentia
122
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia118
Charles Wagner
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºReplacing the RRFB at the intersection of
Yorba Linda Boulevard and Kilt Avenue
with a dedicated traffic signal could
improve crossing safety given high
pedestrian volumes. A signal warrant
analysis shall be conducted as the
next step.
ºParents stop and park on Yorba Linda
Boulevard and walk their kids to school.
Traffic calming on Yorba Linda Boulevard
would make this safer.
ºMany students access the school through
Wagner Park on the north side of the
school. Adding designated student loading
areas and paved walking paths would
make this more comfortable.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle collision within a
quarter mile of the school near the intersection
of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Kilt Avenue.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"717 E Yorba Linda Blvd., Placentia, CA
92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 399
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
The school has two access points, one
on Yorba Linda Boulevard and one on
Trumpet Avenue.
To improve safety for students who access the
school via Yorba Linda Boulevard, this Plan
proposes a traffic light at the intersection of
Yorba Linda Boulevard/Kilt Avenue to reduce
conflict between pedestrians and high-speed
motor vehicles on Yorba Linda Boulevard. A
signal warrant analysis shall be conducted as
the next step
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Yorba Linda
Boulevard/Kilt Avenue will bridge gaps
between sidewalks and enhance mobility for
people of all ages and abilities.
A safety mirror on the northeast corner of
Yorba Linda Boulevard/Kilt Avenue can help
pedestrians spot vehicles pulling out of the
school’s driveway ahead of time.
High-visibility crosswalk with rectangular rapid
flashing beacons in front of the entrance to the
school
The segment on Yorba Linda Boulevard from
the school’s driveway to Seville Street is a no-
parking zone; the City could consider painting
the curb red to reinforce this rule more clearly.
To improve safety for students who access the
school via Trumpet Avenue, this Plan proposes
student loading areas along Trumpet Avenue
near the school gate.
Installing high-visibility crosswalks on the west
and south legs at Trumpet Avenue/Seville
Street and installing advance yield markings
at Trumpet Avenue/Shaw Circle and Trumpet
Avenue/Cartlen Drive can make crossing feel
more comfortable for pedestrians.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Trumpet
Avenue/Cartlen Drive will bridge gaps between
sidewalks and enhance mobility for people of
all ages and abilities.
123
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 119
Figure 44. Charles Wagner Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Wagner
Elementary
HEMINGWAY AVE
KINGSWOOD DR SHERWOOD VILLAGE CIROTT AVE
CUYLER AVE
HAMER LNNL KCAMROCCMSKYMEADOW DR
HEATHER AVE TS TREBNASAPPLING AVE
HIGHLANDER AVE
Wagner Park
TRUMPET
AVE
TENNYSON AVE
ALCOTT AVE
YORBA LINDA BLVD
SHADY LN
LAWN AVE
MOSS CIR TABAH LN
SHADBURN AVESTEINBECK STCARTLEN DRHAMER DRSEVILLE STANDERSON STVALENCIA AVEEl Dorado High
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Safety Mirror
!School Entrance
!!Yield Markings
Parking Restrictions
Traffic Light
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Wagner Elementary
Placentia
124
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia120
Col. J. K.
Tuffree Middle
School and
Parkview
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School and Parkview
School are adjacent to each other, so the
walk audits for the two schools were
conducted together.
ºSpeeding appears prevalent along
Kraemer Boulevard, and participants
expressed concerns that drivers ignore
school signage.
ºDrivers turning right onto Patrician Lane
from Kraemer Boulevard have been
observed doing so at a high rate of speed
and failing to yield to pedestrians. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
ºThe school lacks dedicated school bus
loading zones, and buses have been
observed parking within the bike lane on
Kraemer Boulevard in front of Parkview
School during morning arrival.
ºCongestion at Tuffree Middle School’s
parking lot creates queuing along Kraemer
Boulevard during arrival.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle accident within a
quarter mile of Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School
at Tuffree Boulevard and San Carlos Way.
There have been two pedestrian collisions
within a quarter mile of Parkview School at
the intersection of Kraemer Boulevard and
Golden Avenue.
COL. J. K. TUFFREE SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"2151 N Kraemer Blvd., Placentia, CA
92870
ºGrades: 7–8
º2023 Enrollment: 637
PARKVIEW SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"2189 N Kraemer Blvd., Placentia, CA
92870
ºGrades: TK–12 (Home School)
º2023 Enrollment: 476
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Expanding the existing median to occupy the
former left-turn slip lane at Kraemer Boulevard/
Morning arrival congestion spills into Kraemer
Boulevard
Bus parked in the bike lane on Kraemer Boulevard
Patrician Lane would increase the safety of the
existing pedestrian refuge island.
Extending the existing red curb on Kraemer
Boulevard toward the north, covering the rest
of the school property will prevent people
parking cars along the curb in bike lanes.
Installing a crosswalk on the east leg of
Kraemer Boulevard/Bagnall Drive can close
the gap between sidewalks.
125
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 121
Figure 45. Col. J. K. Tuffree Middle School and Parkview School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !25
!
!
!
!
!
!
Tuffree
Middle
YAW NESPIKOCH AVE
GOLDEN AVE
BASTANCHURY RD
BAGNALL AVE
BEAL AVEEVA KCOHN KRAEMER BLVDSAN REMO AVEBELFORD AVESANTA ANITA AVELORETO PLTUFFREE BLVDFREDERICK STSANTA ROSA WAY
BAGNALL DR
BLANQUITA WAY
GARFIELD AVE
PATRICIAN LN
SAN LUIS WAY
W BORROMEO AVE
JUANITA WAY
FLEMING AVE
SAN CARLOS WAY
SOMEREST DR
Brookhaven
Elementary
Tri-City Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
Parkview
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Refuge Island
Speed Feedback Sign
Parking Restrictions
!25
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Tuffree Middle/Parkview
Placentia
126
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia122
Orangethorpe Avenue is a major thoroughfare and
traffic route
El Camino Real Continuation High School
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"1351 E Orangethorpe Ave., Placentia,
CA 92870
ºGrades: 9–12 (Continuation)
º2023 Enrollment: 138
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Pedestrian-scale lighting at the Orangethorpe-
Jefferson bus stops will improve safety for
students who take transit.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºOrangethorpe Avenue is a busy
thoroughfare with high posted speed limits.
Driver disregard of the 25-mph school
zone signage appears prevalent.
ºPedestrian obstructions were observed at
the west leg of Orangethorpe Avenue and
Jefferson Street where a train crossing
signal obstructs space for pedestrians
waiting to cross the street.
ºThe principal stated they would like
a greater police presence for traffic
enforcement purposes.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one bicycle collision within a
quarter mile of the school near Orangethorpe
Avenue and Jefferson Street.
127
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 123
Figure 46. El Camino Real Continuation High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !DRAFT WAYZ E H N E R W A Y
H OLCOM B P L
CAMPANIS LN IS M AIL PL
O R C H ARD RD
ORANGETHORPE AVECOLLARD RDL
U
K
E
L
N
R
IV
E
RA P L
BELFI LNCASTNER DR LP ELREBOTUSTIN AVES JEFFERSON STCH
E
R
RY STSAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
Sidewalk Improvements
!
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
El Camino Real Continuation High
Placentia
128
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia124
El Dorado High School
school. The two pedestrian collisions occurred
near the intersection of Valencia Avenue/Yorba
Linda Boulevard, and the bicycle collision
occurred on Valencia Avenue near
Holmes Avenue.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"1651 Valencia Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: 9–12
º2023 Enrollment: 2,004
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan proposes new high-visibility
crosswalks and student crossing signs on
the south and west legs at Brookhaven
Avenue/Swanee Avenue for students who
access the school through the back gate on
Brookhaven Avenue.
ADA-compliant curb ramps on the northwest,
southeast, and southwest corners at
Brookhaven Avenue/Swanee Avenue will
bridge gaps between sidewalks and enhance
mobility for people of all ages and abilities.
Speeding appears prevalent along Valencia
Avenue, further speed studies need to be
conducted to verify speed conditions.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºSpeeding in school zones while students
are present appears prevalent at arterial
roads surrounding El Dorado High
including Valencia Avenue, Bastanchury
Road, and Yorba Linda Boulevard. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
ºStudents were observed biking on
sidewalks on Valencia Avenue and
Yorba Linda Boulevard where safe bike
infrastructure is lacking.
ºThe pedestrian crossing time at Shady
Lane and Valencia Avenue is 18 seconds.
Extending pedestrian crossing time and
enforcing a leading pedestrian interval can
enhance crossing safety.
ºSome parents pick up their students at
the back gate on the west side of the
campus, so there should be consideration
of potential improvements along
Brookhaven Avenue.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been two pedestrian collisions and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of the
129
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 125
Figure 47. El Dorado High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
El Dorado
High
HEMINGWAY AVE
BLVD
Y O R B A L I N D A
C
LE DE CO R O N A D O
R IO G R A N D E A V E
E LEONVIA DTS EUGORHEATHER AVE
HIGHLANDER AVEBROOKHAVEN AVEVALENCIA AVESEVILLE STBROWER AVE
SHADY LN
LAWN AVE
HOLMES AVE
TRUMPET AVE
TAHOE AVEGEETING PLJONES PLKELLEHER PLBROWERWOODS PLMACINNES PLWagner Park Brookhaven
Elementary
Wagner
Elementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
Recommendation!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
ADA Ramps
High Visibility Crosswalk
Pedestrian Beacon
Raised Crosswalk
Safety Mirror
School Entrance
Yield Markings
Sidewalk Improvements
Parking Restrictions
Traffic Calming
Traffic Light
RECOMMENDATIONS
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
El Dorado High
Placentia
130
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia126
Cars queuing in the middle of Golden Avenue for
dismissal
Major arterial midblock crossing on Valencia
Avenue at George J. Koch Park
George
Key School
and Golden
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
George Key School and Golden Elementary
School are adjacent to each other, so the
walk audits for the two schools were
conducted together.
ºVehicles queue on Golden Avenue as
parents wait in line, including parking and
waiting in the bike lane.
ºSchools encourage parents to use George
J. Koch Park or the back neighborhood
entrances for arrival and dismissal as an
alternative to the main arrival/dismissal
point on Golden Avenue.
ºValencia Avenue is a major street with
difficult crossings and narrow sidewalks.
Traffic calming would be useful.
ºA midblock crossing, such as an RRFB
or pedestrian hybrid beacon with a high-
visibility crosswalk and refuge island,
would be useful on Golden Avenue
where students cross the street among
waiting cars.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of the
schools at the intersection of Valencia Avenue/
Golden Avenue.
GEORGE KEY SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"710 Golden Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: TK–12 (Special Education)
º2023 Enrollment: 128
GOLDEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"740 Golden Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 763
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends that the school increase
access points by adding entrances at the end
of Heloise Way and at Royal Steward in George
J. Koch Park. Additionally, a sign should be
installed at the end of Mignon Way to indicate
a school entrance. Having multiple entrances
can reduce the necessity for detours, thereby
increasing students’ willingness to walk and
bike to school.
Installing stop signs for east-west traffic
approaching the existing midblock crossing
on Golden Avenue in front of the school
can reduce conflicts between pedestrians
and vehicles.
131
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 127
Figure 48. Golden Elementary School and George Key School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !!
!
!
!
Ä90GREENLEAF DR
EARNSHAW DRDATE ST
CARINA AVEVALENCIA AVEELM ST
MATHEWSON AVEEVA RONYARTOAKHAVEN AVERD REMAHGOLDEN AVE
LEMKE DR
CHICAGO AVE
ELM ST
VALENCIA AVECARTLEN DRMCCORMACK LNMIGNON WAYHELOISE WAYCARTLEN DRR O
Y
A
L
S
T
E
W
A
R
T
D
R
George J Koch Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
!Pedestrian Beacon
!School Entrance
!Signage*
*School Entrance Welcome Sign
RECOMMENDATIONS
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Golden Elementary/George Key
Placentia
132
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia128
John O. Tynes
Elementary
School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºTraffic conflicts are visible at Central
Avenue and Stanford Drive—drivers form
two right turn lanes and two left-turn lanes
turning from Central Avenue onto Stanford
Drive (both single lane streets).
ºParents waiting or parking on Stanford
Drive to pick up their children create
traffic congestion and potential vehicle-
pedestrian conflicts. Intersection
daylighting and raised midblock crossings
will improve crossing safety.
ºSome parents ignore traffic rules such as
prohibitions on left turns from Stanford
Drive into the school’s parking lot, as well
as performing illegal U-turns at Central
Avenue and Stanford Drive. Improving
sign visibility and increasing enforcement
presence may be helpful.
ºSome parents pick up their children exiting
from the back gate at Richard Samp Park.
A formalized loading area near
the park may provide more safe and
orderly loading.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been three pedestrian collisions
within a quarter mile of the school, one of
which occurred at the intersection of Chapman
Avenue and Mission Way, resulting in a
severe injury.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"735 Stanford Dr., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 752
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends traffic calming features,
such as speed humps and speed cushions,
along Stanford Drive from Central Avenue to
Dartmouth Way to slow down traffic.
High-visibility crosswalks at Stanford Road/
Dartmouth Way and at Stanford Road/Central
Avenue will alert drivers that pedestrians may
be in the area.
ADA-compliant curb ramps at Stanford Road/
Dartmouth Way will bridge gaps between
sidewalks and enhance mobility for people of
all ages and abilities.
Implementing intersection daylighting parking
restrictions on the north and west legs of
Central Avenue/Stanford Drive will provide
drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists a better view
of the intersection.
Parents park along Stanford Drive to pick up their
children
Installing a short center median (such as on
Lyons Way and De Jesus Drive) on Stanford
Drive near the school entrance will prevent
double right turns and double left turns from
Central Avenue onto Stanford Drive, and illegal
U-turns on Stanford Drive.
A safety mirror on the southwest corner of
Central Avenue/Stanford Drive can help
pedestrians spot vehicles pulling out of
Stanford Drive ahead of time.
133
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 129
Figure 49. John O. Tynes Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!!!!
Tynes
Elementary
ALTA VISTA ST
ALL AMERICA WYLILAC DRHIBISCUS WAYJASMINE CIRCHAPMAN AVE
SAN AN SELMO LNSAN JUAN LN
GARDENIA AVE
STANFORD D
R
DE JESUS DR
DARTMOUTH DR
FORDHAM DR
LOYOLA DR
VANDERBILT DR
COLGATE DR LANGER DR
LYONS WAYN CENTRAL AVEMISSION WAYSAN CLEMENTE LNRichard Samp
Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Parking Restrictions
!Safety Mirror
Parking Restrictions
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Tynes Elementary
Placentia
134
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia130
Kraemer Middle School and Valencia High School
addressing these issues. If possible,
sidewalks should be widened or buffered
to provide a more comfortable walking
space.
ºBradford Avenue, Madison Avenue, and
Chapman Avenue lack safe biking space.
Madison Avenue and Chapman Avenue
have high speeds and would benefit from
protected bike lanes. On the other hand,
Bradford Avenue is narrow, and it may
be challenging to fit bike lanes without
removing parking lanes.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been seven pedestrian collisions
and three bicycle collisions within a quarter
mile of the school. One of the pedestrian
collisions, which occurred at the intersection of
Bradford Avenue and Ruby Drive, resulted in a
severe injury.
Vehicle driving in the opposing lane on Alta Vista
Drive
KRAEMER MIDDLE SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"645 N Angelina Dr., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: 7–8
º2023 Enrollment: 1,028
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºLane markings on Alta Vista Street leading
to Kraemer Middle’s driveway are complex
with the potential to create conflict.
Consider updated markings to minimize
confusion and compliance issues.
ºSome parents wait for their students at the
parking lot near Kraemer Middle’s baseball
field and along Angelina Drive. If possible,
a formalized loading area near the baseball
field parking lot would be helpful.
ºStudents and parents cross at midblock
locations on Angelina Drive. Consider
adding midblock crossing elements such
as RRFBs, high-visibility crosswalks, and
raised medians.
ºSpeeding issues were observed on roads
surrounding Valencia High, including
Bradford Avenue, Madison Avenue, and
Chapman Avenue. Further speed studies
need to be conducted to verify speed
conditions. Moreover, drivers block
visibility at intersections on Bradford
Avenue, and sidewalks on Madison Avenue
are narrow and inconsistent. Connecting
sidewalk gaps would be helpful in
135
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 131
Kraemer Middle School and Valencia High School
VALENCIA HIGH SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"500 Bradford Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: 9–12
º2023 Enrollment: 2,628
Narrow sidewalk and no bike lane on Madison
Avenue
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Installing delineators along Alta Vista Street in
front of the school would prevent drivers from
driving onto opposite traffic lanes.
Installing high-visibility crosswalks on the west
and north legs at Angelina Drive/Gilbert Way
will alert drivers that pedestrians may be in
the area.
Installing pedestrian signals, such as
signalized crossings or Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacons (PHBs) on Bradford Avenue at
Primrose Avenue and Ruby Drive can alert
drivers to the presence of students and prompt
them to slow down.
Installing a high-visibility crosswalk on the west
leg at Bradford Avenue/Ruby Drive will alert
drivers that pedestrians may be in the area.
ADA-compliant curb ramps are proposed at
multiple intersections near the school along
Bradford Avenue to bridge gaps between
sidewalks and enhance mobility for people of
all ages and abilities.
136
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia132
Figure 50. Kraemer Middle School and Valencia High School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Kraemer
Memorial
Park BRADFORD AVEN ANGELINA DRPAGEANTRY DR
WILSON AVE LAVENDER LNMELROSE STKRAEMER BLVDORCHID DR
ALTA VI
S
T
A
S
T
PRIMROS
E
A
V
E
RUBY DR
JADE AV
E
ANNED D
R
ORANGE
G
R
O
V
E
A
V
E
TURF DR
BRETING
W
A
Y
HANNAH
W
A
Y
E MADIS
O
N
A
V
E
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Stop Warrant
!Yield Markings
Sidewalk Improvements
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Kraemer Middle/Valencia High
Placentia
137
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 133 138
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia134
Melrose Elementary School
and Valadez Middle School
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
Melrose Elementary and Valadez Middle
School are adjacent to each other, so the
walk audits for the two schools were
conducted together.
ºSpeeding appears prevalent on Melrose
Street and La Jolla Street near the
school. Further speed studies need to be
conducted to verify speed conditions.
ºCongestion in the parking lot of Melrose
Elementary spills into La Jolla Street during
morning arrival.
ºA crossing guard reported concerns
with speeding traffic and failure to obey
crossing guard commands.
ºThe designated school bus area for
Valadez Middle School is located next to
the high-visibility crosswalk and RRFB at
La Jolla Street and Segovia Circle. When
buses are parked, it is difficult to see cars
coming from the east.
ºStudents were observed crossing La Jolla
Students walking to school must cross Melrose
Street at La Jolla Street, a large and busy
intersection
MELROSE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"974 S Melrose St., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: TK–5
º2023 Enrollment: 463
Street midblock after being dropped off on
the south side of the street.
ºSome drivers were observed performing
illegal U-turns on La Jolla Street.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been six pedestrian collisions and
six bicycle collisions within a quarter mile of the
school. Two of the bicycle collisions, both of
which occurred along Melrose Street, resulted
in severe injuries. Additionally, one of the
pedestrian collisions, which occurred at
a midblock location on Melrose Street right
in front of the school, also resulted in a
severe injury.
139
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 135
Melrose Elementary School
and Valadez Middle School
Parked buses obstruct views of oncoming vehicles
near the crosswalk
VALADEZ MIDDLE SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"161 E La Jolla St., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: 6–8
º2023 Enrollment: 700
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
This Plan recommends sidewalk widening
along Melrose Street from Orangethorpe
Avenue to La Jolla Street to provide a more
comfortable and safer walking environment
for pedestrians.
ADA-compliant curb ramps and high-
visibility crosswalks are proposed at multiple
intersections near the school to bridge gaps
between sidewalks and enhance mobility for
people of all ages and abilities.
Installing a speed feedback sign and 25-mph
school zone signage on La Jolla Street near
the school can inform drivers of the presence
of students and prompt them to slow down.
This Plan suggests moving the bus zone
farther away from the crosswalk at La Jolla
Street/Segovia Circle, as it currently obstructs
the view of westbound traffic.
Installing a speed feedback sign and 25-mph
school zone signage on La Jolla St near the
school can inform drivers of the presence of
students and prompt them to slow down.
140
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia136
Figure 51. Melrose Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations 57 !
!25!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!
!!
Ä57
Valadez
Middle
School AcademyMELROSE STORANG E THORPE A VE
MIRA L O M A A VE RED GUM STE LA JOLLA
S
T
E VIA MAR
T
E
N
SORTEGA WAYSEGOVIA
C
IR
S MELROSE
STTAFOLLA ST
McFadden Park
MelroseElementary
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Signage*
Speed Feedback SignRecommendation
Sidewalk Improvements
Pedestrian Priority Zone
*School Zone signage SW24-1
!25
Traffic Calming
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Valadez Middle School Academy/
Melrose ElementaryPlacentia
141
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 137 142
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia138
Morse Elementary School
Curb ramps do not exist at the Morse Avenue/
Cypress Point Drive intersection
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Implementing parking restrictions near this
crossing can improve visibility for drivers,
pedestrians, and cyclists, thereby reducing
conflicts between different modes of travel.
ADA-compliant curb ramps and high-
visibility crosswalks are proposed at multiple
intersections along Morse Avenue near the
school to bridge gaps between sidewalks
and enhance mobility for people of all ages
and abilities.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºStudents would benefit from a safer
crossing on Morse Avenue. This can be
achieved by adding midblock crossings
with traffic control, installing ADA-
compliant curb ramps, and enforcing
intersection daylighting.
ºSpeeding issues are sometimes observed
on Morse Avenue, which can be improved
by adding traffic calming features. Further
speed studies need to be conducted to
verify speed conditions.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile on
Morse Avenue in front of the school.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"431 Morse Ave., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 374
143
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 139
Figure 52. Morse Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !!!!
!!!!
Bradford
Park
LIMERICK DRYORB A L I N D A B L V D
EVA AICNELAVKRAEMER BLVDCLE D E C O R O N A D O
AVACAVENIDA DE
PAGEANTRY DRDOVER WAYROCKAWAY DR
PALM DR
DE LEONVIA
VIA CORTEZCARNATION DR
CAND
L
E
W
O
O
D
AVE
PINE
H
U
R
S
T STNOTTINGHAM WAYEAGLE DR ATHENS AVEEL DORADO STFAIRWAY LN MOR
S
E
A
V
E
BARR
Y
P
L
TANG
I
E
R
A
V
E
ROBB
I
E
P
L
NOR
M
A
N
D
Y
A
V
E
E PAL
M
D
R
HILL
C
R
E
S
T
A
V
E
ST A
N
D
R
E
W
S
A
V
ECYPRESS POINT DRN ANGELINA DRORLEANS DRVALENCIA AVECHERRY HILLS DRORLEANS DRSAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Stop Warrant
RecommendationSidewalk Improvements
Parking Restrictions
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Morse Elementary
Placentia
144
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia140
Most crossings in the neighborhood lack painted
crosswalks
Ruby Drive Elementary School
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"601 Ruby Dr., Placentia, CA 92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 356
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
High-visibility crosswalks are proposed at
multiple intersections along Ruby Drive near
the school to alert drivers that pedestrians may
be in the area.
A stop sign study should be conducted
for the east-west traffic on Ruby Drive at
Diamond Road. This can create an all-way
stop-controlled intersection, making it safer for
pedestrians to cross and reach the school.
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºThe school crossing guard stated many
drivers speed along Ruby Drive and
through the stop signs at Ruby Drive and
Twilight Street.
ºAfternoon dismissal congestion spills
into Ruby Drive from the front parking lot,
blocking the crosswalks at Ruby Drive and
Twilight Street. High-visibility crosswalks
could reduce conflicts.
ºSome drivers stop in the middle of
Ruby Drive to drop off their students.
Conspicuous signage and enforcement
presence can reduce issues.
ºSome students cross Ruby Drive midblock
to get to Ruby Drive Elementary. Consider
midblock crossing improvements such as
RRFBs and raised medians.
COLLISION HISTORY
There has been one pedestrian collision and
one bicycle collision within a quarter mile of the
school on Madison Avenue.
145
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 141
Figure 53. Ruby Drive Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!PLACENTIA AVEQUARTZ LN
TIGER LN
RUBY DR
STARDUST STMADISON AVE
SUNRISE STHARMONY LNDEERPARK DRORCHID DR
SHEREE LN
RUBY DR
MOONBEAM STSTARDUST DRBRADFORD AVEDIANE AVEAQUAMARINE STDIAMOND RDTWILIGHT STTWILIGHTLNDIAMOND RDSUNRISE STPRIMRO S
E
A
V
E
JADE AV
E
W MADIS
O
N
A
V
E
DIAMOND RDSAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Pedestrian Beacon
!Stop Warrant
!Yield Markings
Sidewalk Improvements
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Ruby Drive Elementary
Placentia
146
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia142
Sierra Vista Elementary School
Class IIB buffered bike lane on Bastanchury Road,
on the north side of Sierra Vista Elementary
What Did We Learn?
WALK AUDIT FINDINGS
ºSome vehicles appeared to be speeding
on Placentia Avenue. Further speed
studies need to be conducted to verify
speed conditions.
ºOne person (not a student) was observed
crossing Placentia Avenue midblock to get
to the shopping center across from Sierra
Vista Elementary.
ºPlacentia Avenue and Bastanchury Road
is a large and busy intersection. A crossing
guard is posted here, but few students
crossed at this intersection. The crossing
guard said the area is overall safe for
students who walk.
COLLISION HISTORY
There have been two pedestrian collisions and
three bicycle collisions within a quarter mile of
the school.
SCHOOL DETAILS
ºSchool Address
"1811 N Placentia Ave., Placentia, CA
92870
ºGrades: TK–6
º2023 Enrollment: 482
WHAT DO WE RECOMMEND?
Striping “Keep Clear” markings on the
southbound lanes of Placentia Avenue in front
of the school driveway entrance will prevent
drivers attempting to enter the lot from blocking
the road.
Improving pedestrian-scale lighting on
Placentia Avenue from Bastanchury Road to
Lewis Place can enhance walking safety during
times with limited natural light.
Upgrading the existing standard crosswalks to
high-visibility crosswalks at Placentia Avenue/
Lewis Place will alert drivers that pedestrians
may be in the area. High-visibility crosswalks
are also proposed along Placentia Avenue
at multiple residential streets to bridge gaps
between sidewalks.
147
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 143
Figure 54. Sierra Vista Elementary School Safe Routes to School Recommendations !
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
Sierra
Vista
Elementary
ARMSTRONG DRYAW NESPISHERWOOD AVE
LIVINGSTON AVE
NENN O A V E
MYSTIC AVE
EVA NRUBEARBHARTFORD RDDR DROFDEBEVA EGDIRBMACWINCHESTER STLP NROHTFLEMING AVE
RUMSEY PLLP MELASEVA KCOHEVA YELNATSDR DRANACW BASTANCHURY RD
MYSTIC AVE
WHITTEN WAY
BARKER WAY
JOAN WAY
LEE PL LEWIS PL
PAL
M
D
R
ST JOHN
WAY
LORI WAY
ROSPAW WAY
WOODEN DR
NELL CIR
N PLACENTIA AVEST JAMES PLVIRGINIA PLMIDDLESEX PLGILMAN CIRGeorge Key
Ranch
Historic
Park
SAFE ROUTE TO SCHOOL
RECOMMENDATIONS
BOUNDARIES
1/4 Mile Radius Around School
Water
Parks
RECOMMENDATIONS
!ADA Ramps
!High Visibility Crosswalk
!Keep Clear Marking
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
0 0.04 0.07 MILES
Crossing Guard Locations
Sierra Vista Elementary
Placentia
148
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia144
Non-Infrastructure Program Recommendations
Non-infrastructure programming complements
the recommended infrastructure in this Plan
by providing opportunities for community
members to learn about the benefits of walking
and biking and by encouraging community
members to use active transportation to
replace driving trips. Successful programs
typically follow a five Es approach, adapted
from the League of American Bicyclists.
Equity
Programming should be available and accessible for all community members in Yorba Linda and Placentia, particularly in disadvantaged communities.
Engineering
Programming should support the implementation of active transportation infrastructure.
Education
Programming should educate community members about the benefits of using active transportation. Educational programming should also teach community members how to use existing walking and biking facilities in the city, and how all road users should share the road.
Encouragement
Programming should encourage walking and biking in the city through celebrations, group activities, and special events.
Evaluation
Programming should include metrics that evaluate the levels of walking and biking in the city to compare data before and after the implementation of a program or infrastructure improvement.
149
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 145
Non-Infrastructure Program Recommendations
The following section describes existing and
recommended programming in the cities of
Yorba Linda and Placentia and in the Orange
County region. While the Cities should lead
the implementation of these recommended
programs, this can also be an opportunity for
City staff to work with local nonprofits, schools,
neighborhood groups, and
jurisdiction partners.
Existing Programs
Yorba Linda Senior Mobility
Program/TRAILS (Equity)
The City of Yorba Linda, in partnership with the
Orange County Transportation Authority and
California Yellow Cab, offers an affordable,
door-to-door transportation service for seniors
aged 60 and older. This wheelchair-accessible
service covers destinations within Yorba Linda
and extends up to 5 miles outside the city.
Available daily, including holidays, rides can be
scheduled between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.
Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA) Bicyclist and
Pedestrian Education (Education)
The OCTA Safe Travels Education Program
(STEP) provides school-based skills and
traffic safety instruction that can be conducted
during PE or an after-school program. STEP
emphasizes development of pedestrian and
bicycle traffic safety skills, bike handling skills,
safe riding practices (“street smarts”), helmet fit,
and bike prep.
Orange County Bicycle Coalition
(Education, Encouragement)
Orange County Bicycle Coalition is a non-
profit committed to creating a bikeable Orange
County. Commuting and recreational bicyclists
formed the Orange County Bicycle Coalition in
1991 to promote bicycling as an everyday means
of transportation and recreation. The coalition
facilitates classes and campaigns to educate
cyclists on maintenance and road safety. The
organization also provides resources to help
plan group rides and updates on changes to
bicycle routes throughout the county.
Recommended Programs
Demonstration Projects
(Engineering, Evaluation)
Demonstration projects are temporary, short-
term, low-cost roadway projects that are used
to test, evaluate, and refine potential changes
to the street before investing in long-term
solutions. They use inexpensive materials
such as paint and flexible bollards to try
things like median refuge islands, protected
bike lanes, and more. People can try out
the demonstration and provide feedback to
each city, which can be considered before
permanent installation. Demonstration
projects can also build support for permanent
infrastructure and can encourage residents
to advocate for safer pedestrian and
bicycle infrastructure in their communities.
Demonstration projects can be installed
for as short as a few hours, or as long as a
few weeks.
Quick-Build Projects (Engineering,
Evaluation)
Quick- build projects are installed quickly
with low-cost materials. Unlike demonstration
projects, quick-build projects are intended to
be long-term installations. Quick-build projects
150
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia146
provide active transportation improvements
to communities on shorter timelines than
traditional construction. Because of the low-
cost materials, quick-build projects allow for
flexibility, and can be modified after installation
to better fit the needs of the community. Quick-
build projects can last years, allowing Yorba
Linda and Placentia to collect ample resident
feedback before constructing the improvement
with more permanent materials.
Safe Routes for Seniors (Equity,
Engineering, Encouragement,
Education, Evaluation)
Safe Routes for Seniors programs can provide
active opportunities for older adults in Yorba
Linda and Placentia to foster healthy aging
and longer years of independent living. The
Safe Routes for Seniors project is based on
the Safe Routes to School model, a highly
replicable model that pioneered the approach
of bringing together stakeholders, finding out
their needs, and creating useful maps based
on findings. The program develops tools and
services to help seniors find ways to meet
their transportation needs through trips that
primarily include walking and transit, both
by bus or rail. Developing programs that
include group walks geared toward seniors
will also encourage social bonding. The
program can include key awareness topics
such as education for drivers to pay particular
attention to senior pedestrians and specific
improvements such as increasing crossing
time in areas that experience a high number
of seniors walking. Feedback received from
the program can inform future infrastructure
improvements that further address the needs
of older adults.
Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) - Go Human
Campaign (Encouragement)
Go Human is a community engagement
program with the goals of reducing traffic
collisions in Southern California and
encouraging people to walk and bike more.
At the center of Go Human is a regional safety
advertisement campaign, which encourages
drivers to slow down and watch for people
walking and biking and reminds all road users
to abide by local laws and to be courteous to
other users. Campaign materials can include
posters, bus shelter ads, banners, yard signs,
spoke cards, and more.
Bike Rack Sponsorship Program
Encouragement (Engineering)
To help meet the demand for short-term
bicycle parking, the Cities can develop a bike
rack sponsorship program where a donor
purchases a bike rack for their community,
and a dedication plaque is personalized with a
message or logo from the donor. The location
of the bicycle rack is agreed upon by the
donor and the Cities. In addition to the cost of
the bicycle rack and dedication plaque, the
donor pays for the associated installation and
maintenance costs.
Transportation Demand Management
(Encouragement)
Transportation demand management strategies
can help Yorba Linda and Placentia reach their
active transportation goals by incentivizing
businesses that encourage walking and biking,
and by disincentivizing driving by limiting
parking, implementing rideshare systems,
creating active transportation campaigns, and
providing active transportation options.
Open Streets Events
(Encouragement, Education)
Open streets events temporarily close streets
to motor vehicle travel and open them to all
active transportation travel. These events are
free to the public and typically span multiple
cities. Activities include community booths,
music, and bicycle safety and education
opportunities. Open streets events encourage
151
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 147
community members to experience their
streets in new ways and can build support
for more active transportation infrastructure
in a community. Open streets events are also
an excellent opportunity to install temporary
demonstration projects and to collect feedback
from community members.
Bicycle and Public Transit Tours
(Encouragement)
Bicycle and public transit tours can promote
local and regional tourism to the area. Potential
themes include a focus on businesses and
festivals, coordination with major events,
recreational road cycling, and history.
Bicycle Friendly Businesses
(Encouragement)
Awarded by the League of American
Bicyclists, bicycle-friendly businesses are
recognized for their efforts in encouraging
employees to bike to work. Employers may
offer incentives such as bicycle equipment
subsidies, bicycle commuter tax benefits, and
guaranteed ride home programs. Employers
can also encourage bicycling by participating
in bike-to-work days and bicycle events in
the community, offering shared bicycles
for employees, providing bicycle parking,
showers, and repair tools, and inviting
instructors to teach employees safe
bicycling skills. Yorba Linda and Placentia
should encourage local businesses to
implement these incentives and apply for
the award. The Cities should also apply for
Bicycle Friendly Community status once
this Active Transportation Plan has been
sufficiently implemented.
Active Transportation Counts
(Evaluation)
Pedestrian and bicyclist counts can help
identify travel patterns for active transportation
users and can track the usage of new active
transportation infrastructure. Counts should
be conducted at intersections or street
corridors prior to the implementation of
new infrastructure, and then again after the
implementation of the infrastructure. These
counts will help the cities of Yorba Linda
and Placentia understand how future active
transportation infrastructure can best serve
the community, and the types of programming
that may benefit pedestrians and bicyclists in
the community.
Bike Voucher Programs (Equity,
Encouragement)
Bike voucher programs can be enacted in
different ways. For disadvantaged communities
in Yorba Linda and Placentia, the Cities can
offer vouchers to qualifying residents to
purchase a new bicycle or to offset the cost
of a new bicycle. The Cities may also choose
to offer incentives for residents that forego car
ownership in exchange for bicycle vouchers.
Residents that do not own a motor vehicle can
apply for the incentive, and in exchange, the
City can provide the resident with a voucher
to purchase a new bicycle or to maintain an
existing bicycle. These vouchers can help
create a more equitable transportation network
by ensuring all residents in Yorba Linda and
Placentia have access to an efficient mode of
transportation, and by reducing the number of
motor vehicles on the road.
Impaired Driving Campaign
(Education)
Over half of the fatal and serious injury crashes
studied in Yorba Linda and Placentia involved
one or more impaired road users. The Cities
can work with health advocates, local law
enforcement and state agencies, and local
businesses such as bars and restaurants, to
promote sober road use through established or
new educational activities.
152
Recommendations Yorba Linda-Placentia148
Safe Routes
to School Programs
International Walk to School Day
(Encouragement)
International Walk to School Day is an
opportunity for schools to highlight the many
benefits of walking and promote pedestrian
safety for students. The event is observed
each year on the first Wednesday in October.
The observance creates awareness and
inspires local action on creating a safer and
environmentally sustainable environment.
School Crossing Guard Training
Education (Engineering)
School crossing guards play an integral role in
fostering a safe and comfortable environment
for students walking and bicycling to school.
Training is an essential step to help ensure
that crossing guards are performing properly
and safely. Crossing guards can help create
gaps in traffic on busy neighborhood collector
roads, remind drivers of the presence of
people walking, instill safe walking skills in
students and their families, and indicate when
people driving should yield. The California
Active Transportation Resource Center provides
trainer courses at no cost to help jurisdictions
and law enforcement with guidance on how to
train and vet potential new and existing
crossing guards.
BP/AR 5142.2 – Safe Routes to School
Program (Encouragement)
Encourage the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified
School District to adopt the California School
Board Association’s sample board and
administrative regulations BP/AR 5142.2 –
Safe Routes to School Program. Including
Safe Routes to School language in a school
board policy can be an important first step
toward supporting these activities in schools
throughout the district.
Contests and Challenges
(Encouragement)
Students track walking and biking trips to
school toward some kind of goal or reward.
Trips can be tallied for individuals, classrooms,
grades, or school-wide. Track trips using punch
cards, tally sheets, or an app toward individual
or group rewards.
Park-and-Walk (Encouragement)
School buses and caregivers drop students
at an established location a few blocks from
school where students are greeted by school
staff or other volunteers and supervised
on their walk to school. Park-and-walk
programs can also follow a dispersed model
using nearby neighborhood streets for arrival
and dismissal.
Safe Routes to School Campaign
(Encouragement)
Safe Routes to School Campaigns are meant
to educate parents, neighbors, and others
to drive slowly and attentively, and watch out
for students walking and biking near schools.
Campaigns may use a range of strategies
to share messaging including yard signs,
banners, school communications, and more.
153
RecommendationsActive Transportation Plan 149
School Communications
(Encouragement)
Promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving
behavior and encourage families to walk and
bike to school through school communication
channels such as newsletters, social
media, websites, and in-person events.
Communications can include customized,
high-resolution graphics and messaging
ready to share through electronic platforms
or in print.
Student Safety Patrol (Engagement,
Encouragement)
Student volunteers from upper elementary,
middle, and junior high school can complete
a traffic safety training and learn to direct
children to safely cross vehicle traffic on
and adjacent to campus. Typically, patrols
are appointed by a teacher or principal with
parent approval.
Suggested Routes to School Maps
(Education, Encouragement)
Customized maps can show suggested
walking (and biking for older students) routes
to school along with key information including
crossing guard locations, signalized or stop-
controlled intersections, approximate route
times, key landmarks, and more.
Walk/Bike Field Trips
(Encouragement)
Students travel to a field trip destination on foot
or by bike, or the field trip could be the walk
or bike itself. Possible destinations could be
nearby parks or natural areas, city hall, a fire
department, museum, library, theater,
and more.
Walking School Bus
(Encouragement)
A walking school bus is a safe and fun way
for students to travel to and from school with
adult supervision. Each “bus” walks along a
set route with one or more adults leading it,
picking students up at designated stops along
a predetermined route and walking them to
school. A walking school bus is a great way to
address concerns about stranger danger.
Safe Routes to School Workshops
(Evaluation)
These 30- to 60-minute workshops can be
held for parents, guardians, school staff, city
engineers and planners, law enforcement,
and other Safe Routes to School partners.
Workshop goals and activities can vary, and
may include identifying issues, brainstorming
opportunities, sharing information and
resources, and more.
Facilities Improvements
(Engineering)
Promote community health by developing
opportunities for physical activity such as
creating parks space, walking paths, and
greening of existing routes to school.
154
155
Implementation06
156
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia152
Introduction
This chapter describes the considerations
that the Yorba Linda and Placentia must make
prior to implementing this Plan’s recommended
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Each
recommendation was prioritized based on
a set of criteria and ranked based on the
prioritization scores. These scores help
organize all the recommendations into a
list highlighting projects that should be a
priority for funding and implementation. The
prioritization methodology is described in
detail later in this chapter.
Cost estimates are provided for each
recommendation type, and funding
source options are described that can
be used for designing and constructing
the recommendations. Maintenance is an
important factor in implementing infrastructure,
and this chapter describes existing
mechanisms for maintaining facilities for
people walking and biking.
Non-infrastructure programming can help
residents realize the full potential of the
active transportation network in each city
by educating and encouraging residents to
walk or bike. This chapter also includes a list
of existing and proposed programs to make
walking and biking fun and safe.
Planning level cost estimates are shown in
Table 6 and Table 7. These cost estimates
are based on construction costs for similar
projects in other jurisdictions and do not fully
account for all of the design and engineering
work that will need to be completed prior to
implementation. Due to the varying typology of
the cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia, these
estimates may vary significantly from the final
implementation costs. Costs can also change
due to inflation, or if projects are implemented
in conjunction with other road improvements
or construction projects. These cost estimates
represent the most frequently recommended
projects in this Plan. There are some unique
recommended projects that will require further
study by the Cities to determine their cost
estimates. Future studies will determine the
final cost estimate of each project prior to its
implementation.
Planning Level
Cost Estimates
157
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 153
Planning Level
Cost Estimates
Facility Type Unit Costs Quantity/Mileage Summary Cost Estimate Class I Shared-Use Path $1,620,000 2.0 Miles $3,240,000 Class II Bike Lane $143,000 1.2 Miles $165,500
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane $152,000 5.4 Miles $820,800 Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard $619,000 7.2 Miles $4,456,800 Class IV Separated Bikeway $1,190,000 8.5 Miles $10,115,000 Curb Ramps $7,500 152 $1,140,000
High Visibility Crosswalks $6,000 119 $714,000
Median Refuge Islands $54,000 7 $378,000
Pedestrian Lighting $281,000 1 $140,500
Pedestrian Signal Head $54,000 12 $648,000
Raised Crosswalk $17,000 1 $17,000
RRFB $65,000 2 $130,000
Signage $1,000 7 $7,000
Signal Warrant $17,000 4 $68,000
Speed Feedback sign $16,000 6 $96,000
Stop Warrant $6,000 4 $24,000
Total $22,160,600
Table 6. Placentia Cost Estimates
158
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia154
Facility Type Unit Costs Quantity/Mileage Summary Cost Estimate Class I Shared-Use Path $1,620,000 .4 Miles $648,000
Class II Bike Lane $143,000 9.5 Miles $1,360,000
Class IIB Buffered Bike Lane $152,000 3.9 Miles $593,000 Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard $619,000 12.9 Miles $8,000,000 Curb Ramps $7,500 61 $457,500
High Visibility Crosswalks $6,000 107 $642,000
Pedestrian Signal Head $54,000 4 $216,000
Raised Crosswalk $17,000 1 $17,000
Signage $1,000 14 $14,000
Signal Warrant $17,000 1 $17,000
Speed Feedback sign $16,000 4 $64,000
Stop Warrant $6,000 12 $72,000
Total $12,100,500
Table 7. Yorba Linda Cost Estimates
159
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 155
Prioritization
Yorba Linda Prioritization
Process
Pedestrian Prioritization
As Yorba Linda does not have any state-
identified disadvantaged communities,
the City of Yorba Linda selected a pedestrian
priority zone in Main Street Yorba Linda
that is prioritized for constructing
pedestrian improvements.
Bicycle Prioritization
Yorba Linda bicycle projects are prioritized
using three tiers:
ºTier 1 – Projects that the City can most
easily implement, typically consisting of
lower-cost materials and requiring minimal
changes to current roadway operations
or parking.
ºTier 2 – Projects that are more challenging
to implement but address community
safety and bikeway connectivity concerns,
typically connecting to community
destinations, closing gaps in the bikeway
network, and connecting bicyclists across
jurisdictions. Projects along roadways with
a history of collisions and projects that
travel through Main Street Yorba Linda are
included in Tier 2.
ºTier 3 – Projects that connect to fewer
destinations and are less crucial in
creating a citywide bikeway network, and
bikeways that received fewer supporting
community comments or require significant
funding or roadway reconstruction.
Prioritizing projects helps the cities of Yorba
Linda and Placentia identify projects that
will best provide a safe, comfortable, and
connected active transportation experience
for residents and visitors. The process for
prioritizing recommendations was tailored
to each city and each city’s recommended
infrastructure types.
160
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia156
Placentia
Prioritization Process
Pedestrian Prioritization
Recommendations within the two
disadvantaged communities in the City of
Placentia, as identified by CalEnviroScreen 4.0,
are prioritized for implementation.
Bicycle Prioritization
Like Yorba Linda projects, bicycle projects in
Placentia are prioritized using three tiers:
ºTier 1 – Projects that the City can most
easily implement, typically consisting of
lower-cost materials and requiring minimal
changes to current roadway operations or
parking.
ºTier 2 – Projects that are more challenging
to implement but address community
safety and bikeway connectivity concerns,
typically connecting to community
destinations, closing gaps in the bikeway
network, and connecting bicyclists across
jurisdictions. Projects along roadways with
a history of collisions and projects that
travel through Placentia’s disadvantaged
communities are included in Tier 2.
ºTier 3 – Projects that connect to fewer
destinations and are less crucial in
creating a citywide bikeway network, and
bikeways that received fewer supporting
community comments or require significant
funding or roadway reconstruction.
Prioritization Results
Each bicycle recommendation was prioritized
based on the criteria above. The results of this
process are in Table 8 and Table 9.
161
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 157
Table 8. Yorba Linda Bicycle Infrastructure Prioritization Tiers Street From Street To Street Class Prioritization Tier
Casa Loma Ave Bastanchury Rd Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 1
Dominguez Ranch Rd Yorba Ranch Rd Yorba Ranch Rd IIIB 1 Eastpark Dr Oakcrest Cir Savi Ranch Pkwy IIIB 1
Eastpark Dr Old Canal Rd Oakcrest Cir II 1
Lakeview Ave Yorba Linda Blvd Mariposa Ave II 1
Lemon Dr Imperial Hwy Lakeview Ave IIIB 1
Old Canal Rd Yorba Linda Blvd Savi Ranch Pkwy II 1
Palm St Dead End Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 1
Paseo De La Cumbre Paseo Del Brado Yorba Ranch Rd IIIB 1 Paseo De Las Palomas Fairmont Blvd Village Center Dr IIB 1 Paseo Del Prado Travis Rd Esperanza Rd II 1
Plumosa Dr Bastanchury Rd Lemon Dr IIIB 1
San Antonio Rd Casino Ridge Rd Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 1
Savi Ranch Pkwy Old Canal Rd E Savi Ranch Pkwy II 1
E Savi Ranch Pkwy Savi Ranch Pkwy Eastpark IIIB 1
Valley View Ave Lakeview Ave Valley View Ave II 1
Vista Del Mar Valley Center Valley Center IIIB 1
Wabash Ave Rose Dr Valley View Circle IIIB 1
Ave Barcelona Dead End Esperanza Rd IIIB 2
Buena Vista Ave Richfield Rd Lakeview Ave IIB 2
El Cajon Ave Prospect Ave Valley View Ave IIIB 2
Esperanza Rd Fairmont Blvd Yorba Linda Blvd IIB 2
Eureka Ave Bastanchury Rd Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 2
Fairmont Blvd*Village Center Dr Paseo de Las Palomas II 2 162
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia158
Fairmont Blvd*Paseo de Las Palomas S City Limit II 2
Fairmont Village Center San Antonio IIIB 2
Lakeview Ave Bastanchury Dr Oriente Dr IIIB 2
Lakeview Ave Lemon Dr Yorba Linda Blvd IIIB 2
Mariposa Ave Dead End Lakeview Ave IIIB 2
Oriente Dr Lakeview Ave Palm St IIIB 2
Paseo Del Prado Paseo De Las Palomas Travis Rd IIB 2
Rose Drive*Bastanchury Rd S City Limit II 2
San Antonio Fairmont Casino Ridge IIIB 2
Bastanchury Rd Fairmont Blvd Village Center Dr IIB 3
Paseo De Toronto Avenida del Tren Camino De Bryant IIIB 3 Paseo De Las Palomas Yorba Linda Blvd Vista Del Mar IIB 3 Rose Dr*Wabash Ave Bastanchury Rd II 3
Valley View Ave*Brooklyn Ave Bastanchury Rd II 3
Valley View Ave Lakeview Ave Bastanchury Rd II 3
Weir Canyon Rd North City Limit Savi Ranch Pkwy I 3
Savi Ranch Pkwy/ Mirage St Yorba Linda Blvd Old Canal Rd I 3 *Class II recommendation may be buffered where unconstrained by street parking or right-of-way (ROW) 163
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 159
Table 9. Placentia Bicycle Infrastructure Prioritization Tiers Street From Street To Street Class Prioritization Tier
Angelina Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Kraemer Blvd Bradford Ave IIIB 1 Bastanchury Rd W City Limit E City Limit IIB 1
Bradford Ave N City Limit Santa Fe St IIIB 1
Central Ave Alta Vista St Chapman Ave IIB 1
La Jolla St W City Limit Bridge IIIB 1
La Jolla St Ave De Pio Pico W City Limit IV 1
Livingston Ave Placentia Ave Kraemer Blvd IIIB 1
Madison Ave Bradford Ave Kraemer Blvd II 1
McCormack Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Valencia Ave Golden Ave IIIB 1 Melrose St Chapman Ave Railroad IIIB 1
Morse Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Bradford Ave Alta Vista St IIIB 1 Rose Dr N City Limit S City Limit IIB 1
Tuffree Park Tuffree Park Bastanchury Rd IIIB 1
Alta Vista St Kraemer Blvd E City Limit IIB 2
Chapman Ave Kraemer Blvd Orangethorpe Ave IV 2
Chapman Ave W City Limit Kraemer Blvd II 2
Kraemer Blvd Bastanchury Rd Chapman Ave IV 2
Magnolia Neighborhood Bicycle Blvd Kraemer Blvd Central Ave IIIB 2 Palm St Yorba Linda Blvd Rose Dr IV 2
Santa Fe St Placentia Ave Murray St IV 2
Kraemer Blvd N City Limit Bastanchury Rd IV 2
Yorba Linda Blvd W City Limit E City Limit IV 2
Carbon Canyon Creek/Flood Control Channel N City Limit Parque Del Arroyo Verde I 3 Melrose St Railroad S City Limit IV 3
Valencia Ave N City Limit E Palm Dr IV 3
164
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia160
Maintenance
on each street to determine the best and most
efficient maintenance strategy for long-term
asphalt preservation.
Placentia
The City of Placentia has a Pavement
Management Plan that is updated biennially.
The plan manages the preservation,
rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved
roads by analyzing pavement life cycles,
assessing overall system performance costs,
and determining alternative strategies and
costs necessary to improve the City’s paved
roads. Roads in Placentia are scheduled
for resurfacing based on the Pavement
Management Plan and StreetSaver software.
Each roadway receives a pavement condition
index score, and the roadways are prioritized
for paving based on their scores. California’s
Senate Bill 1 and the City of Placentia’s
Measure U fund the pavement plan.
Both Cities should ensure that repaved
roadways also receive proper maintenance for
their bicycle facilities. Road repaving is also an
excellent opportunity to include new bike lane
striping on a roadway.
Public Works Requests
Yorba Linda
The City of Yorba Linda’s MyCivic 311 app
allows residents to request repairs throughout
the city. Users can request repairs for issues
such as potholes, missing street signs, and
more. Requests can also be submitted via
the MyCivic 311 web portal ( https://www .
yorbalindaca.gov/828/MyCivic-311-Web-
Portal).
Placentia
The iPlacentia mobile app enables residents
to report issues such as road maintenance,
potholes, and street light outages, among
several other options. Using an interactive
map, respondents can drop a pin in the area
that has a maintenance issue and provide a
description. Reports are automatically routed
to the relevant City department for review. A
web version is also available via the “How Do
I?” portal on the City’s website ( https://www .
placentia.org/9/How-Do-I).
Maintaining the pedestrian and bicycle
improvements in Yorba Linda and Placentia
is crucial to ensure the function and longevity
of a safe and effective active transportation
network. Debris, potholes, vegetation, and
trash on paths are common concerns among
residents as unmaintained bikeways and
sidewalks can be uncomfortable to use.
The following section describes existing
practices in both cities for maintaining
active transportation infrastructure and
recommended programs each city can
implement to potentially increase walking and
biking for transportation.
City Pavement Plans
Yorba Linda
Funded by the State of California’s Senate Bill
1, the City of Yorba Linda conducts the Annual
Pavement Preservation Project every year.
The project uses a Pavement Management
Program, which allows for the planning and
programming of street maintenance strategies
throughout the City’s roadway network. The
program is updated on a biennial basis
through efforts that include field inspections
165
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 161
Maintenance
Sidewalk Repair
and Maintenance
Yorba Linda
Residents can report hazardous sidewalks
(those that pose a danger to pedestrians or
fail to meet ADA guidelines, including if the
sidewalk is warped, displaced, or has large
cracks), curbs, and gutters via the City’s
MyCivic 311 app. The service request will be
forwarded to the Public Works Department
who will investigate the damage to determine if
repairs are required and when repairs will
be made.
Placentia
Generally, property owners are responsible
for maintaining the parkway adjacent to their
property. This includes repairing sidewalks and
trimming vegetation. However, if a sidewalk is
hazardous due to tree or root growth from City-
owned and controlled trees or if the affected
sidewalk is over 40 years old, the adjacent
property owner is not obligated to share in
the cost of repair. When property owners are
deemed responsible for repair, the Public
Works Department will instruct them of their
requirement to complete and return a sidewalk
repair agreement or seek a licensed contractor
to complete the necessary work as required
within the time span allowed.
Residents can report hazardous sidewalks via
the City’s iPlacentia app.
Street Lighting
Yorba Linda
For most streets in Yorba Linda, street lighting
is managed by Southern California Edison.
Residents can report streetlights that are
burned out, flickering, or staying on during
the daytime to the Southern California Edison
Outage Center ( https://www.sce.com/outage-
center/report-street-light-outage). Street lights
on Imperial Highway (State Route 90), Via
Nietos, and Via Santa Ana are City-owned and
maintained. Residents can report issues via
the City’s MyCivic 311 app.
Placentia
Most streetlights in Placentia are maintained
by Southern California Edison. Residents
can report streetlight issues via the Southern
California Edison Outage Center ( https://www .
sce.com/outage-center/report-street-light-
outage). Streetlights mounted above traffic
signal lights are owned and maintained by
the City of Placentia. Residents can report
City-owned streetlight issues via the City’s
iPlacentia app.
Street Sweeping
Yorba Linda
Street sweeping is provided by the Yorba
Linda’s Public Works Department. Arterial
highways are swept regularly in Yorba Linda,
and residential streets are swept every other
week. Residents can consult Map Yorba Linda
( https://webgis.yorbalindaca.gov/portal/
home/) to view street sweeping schedules.
Placentia
The City of Placentia contracts with a third-
party service for street sweeping. Street
sweeping is conducted every other week.
Residents can see street sweeping schedules
via the Public Works Department’s website
( https://www.placentia.org/854/Street-
Sweeping).
166
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia162
Funding Sources
Federal and State
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
(ATP)
The ATP was created to encourage the use of
active transportation through encouragement
and safety measures. Eligible projects
include infrastructure projects, education,
encouragement, and enforcement of non-
infrastructure projects which further the goals
of the ATP, a combination of infrastructure
and non-infrastructure activities, and the
development of active transportation plans
in disadvantaged communities. Senate Bill 1
(SB 1) stipulates that $100 million of revenues
from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Account will be available annually to the ATP.
The ATP consolidates existing federal and
state transportation programs, including the
Transportation Alternatives Program, Bicycle
Transportation Account, and State Safe Route
to School, into a single program with a focus
to make California a national leader in active
transportation. Applications are typically
submitted in June.
Typical projects funded by the ATP include:
ºSafe Routes to School programming
ºSafe Routes to Transit programming
ºNew or improved bicycle infrastructure,
including bike lanes and bike parking
ºNew or improved pedestrian facilities
including sidewalks, and crosswalks
ºNetwork links to trails and parks
ºEducational and encourage programming
ºThe goals of the ATP are defined as the
following:
"Increase the proportion of walking and
biking trips
"Increase safety and mobility for non-
motorized users
"Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
"Enhance public health
"Ensure disadvantaged communities
share the benefits of the program
Active Transportation Program (ATP) | CTC
(ca.gov)
Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities Program (AHSC). The goals of
AHSC are to support compact development
in order to preserve land, reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, and increase the supply
of affordable housing near jobs, stores,
transit, and other key destinations. Eligible
projects include sustainable transportation
infrastructure, such as new transit vehicles,
sidewalks, and bike lanes; transportation-
related amenities, such as bus shelters,
benches, or shade trees; and other programs
that encourage residents to walk, bike, and
use public transit. Affordable Housing and
Sustainable Communities (AHSC) Program
| California Department of Housing and
Community Development
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION LOCAL PARTNERSHIP
PROGRAM (LPP)
This program provides $200 million in funding
for local and regional transportation agencies
with voter-approved taxes, tolls, or fees,
which are dedicated solely to transportation
improvements. The program provides funding
167
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 163
for aging infrastructure, road conditions, active
transportation, transit and rail, and health and
safety benefits. The LPP funds are distributed
through a 40% statewide competitive
component and a 60% formulaic component.
Local Partnership Program | CTC
CALTRANS SUSTAINABLE
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANTS
The Sustainable Transportation Planning
Grant Program supports transportation
planning processes that address local and
regional transportation needs and issues. The
program offers two types of grants: Strategic
Partnerships and Sustainable Communities.
The Sustainable Communities Grants has
$29.5 million in funding to encourage local
and regional planning that furthers state
greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. The
Strategic Partnership Grant has $4.5 million
to identify and address statewide or regional
deficiencies on the State highway system in
partnership with Caltrans. The overarching
objectives to guide grant applications are
sustainability, preservation, accessibility,
safety, innovation, economy, health, and social
equity. Past awarded project types include
active transportation, Complete Streets,
transit, safe routes, Vision Zero, and emission
reduction. Sustainable Transportation
Planning Grants | Caltrans
CARBON REDUCTION PROGRAM
Authorized with the BIL in 2022, the Carbon
Reduction Program is a DOT program that
funds projects that support a reduction in
transportation emissions. Eligible projects
include bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure
and public transit facilities. Caltrans distributes
funding based on population sizes using the
2020 Census. Carbon Reduction Program |
US Department of Transportation
CLEAN MOBILITY OPTIONS
Administered by the California Air Resources
Board, the Clean Mobility Options grant funds
projects like bike share, scooter share, car
share, electric vehicle charging stations,
infrastructure for clean mobility, and community
transportation needs assessments. Funds are
available for disadvantaged communities in the
state. Home - Clean Mobility Options
CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR
QUALITY (CMAQ) IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM
The annual CMAQ program provides funding
to State DOTs, MPOs, and transit agencies to
invest in projects that reduce emissions from
transportation-related sources and improve air
quality. CMAQ - Air Quality - Environment -
FHWA (dot.gov)
HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (HSIP)
Administered by Caltrans, the HSIP is offered
every one to two years. The program’s purpose
is to reduce traffic fatalities and serious injuries
on public roads. Projects on any publicly-
owned road or active transportation facility
are eligible, including bicycle and pedestrian
improvements. HSIP focuses on projects
that explicitly address documented safety
challenges through proven countermeasures,
are implementation-ready, and demonstrate
cost-effectiveness. Highway Safety
Improvement Program (HSIP) | FHWA (dot.
gov)
168
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia164
HOUSE TRANSPORTATION &
INFRASTRUCTURE (T&I) COMMITTEE
APPROPRIATIONS
The House T&I Committee invites Members
of Congress to request funding for projects in
their communities. Project funds can be used
for planning, final design, and construction
projects. Eligible projects include bicycle &
pedestrian infrastructure projects that
increase access, strengthen multimodal
connections, reduce greenhouse gas
emissions, and enhance environmental justice.
Contact the offices of the 40th and 45th
Congressional districts.
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS
– GRANTS FOR ART PROJECTS
Grants for Arts Projects provides expansive
funding opportunities to strengthen the
nation’s arts and culture ecosystem. Through
project-based funding, the program supports
opportunities for public engagement with the
arts and arts education, the integration of the
arts with strategies promoting the health and
well-being of people and communities, and
for the improvement of overall capacity and
capabilities within the arts sector. This funding
source could be used for incorporating public
art into a streetscape redesign or adding
thoughtful art elements that are representative
of the local community. GRANTS FOR ARTS
PROJECTS | National Endowment for the Arts
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANTS
The California Office of Traffic Safety has
grant programs that fund projects that
protect bicyclist and pedestrian safety,
raise awareness about traffic rules, and
provide training and programs for high-risk
communities like children and older adults.
Grants | Office of Traffic Safety (ca.gov)
PILOT PROGRAM FOR TRANSIT-
ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
This program’s goal is to improve America’s
public transportation system by providing
funds to integrate land use and transportation
planning. Funding is available for projects
that improve multimodal transportation,
accessibility, and pedestrian and bicycle
access to transit and enable mixed-use
development near transit. Pilot Program for
Transit-Oriented Development Planning –
Section 20005(b) | FTA (dot.gov)
RAISE GRANTS
Previously known as the BUILD and TIGER
grant, the RAISE grant funds the building and
repair of transportation networks. Available
through the U.S. Department of Transportation,
the RAISE grant allows sponsors at the
State and local levels to obtain funding for
multimodal, multi-jurisdictional projects that
are more difficult to support through traditional
funding initiatives. Rebuilding American
Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity
(RAISE) | US Department of Transportation
RECONNECTING COMMUNITIES PILOT
(RCP)GRANT PROGRAM
Implemented by the US Department of
Transportation, the RCP program focuses
on improving access to daily needs such as
jobs, education, healthcare, food, nature, and
recreation, and foster equitable development
and restoration, and provide technical
assistance to further these goals. Funding for
this fiscal year is a combined allocation of FY
2024, 2025, and 2026. Up to $607 million is
available for planning, capital construction,
and technical assistance. The funding will be
implemented as appropriate and consistent
with the priorities in Executive Order 14052.
Reconnecting Communities Pilot Grant
Program | US Department of Transportation
169
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 165
SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL
(SS4A)
Established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law (BIL), this program funds initiatives that
prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries
and can be used to carry out items in support
of creating safety Action Plans like Vision
Zero, and in implementing infrastructure
including installing pedestrian and bicycle
networks, transforming roadway corridors into
Complete Streets, and improving the safety
of intersections. Up to $1 billion is available
each year of the program. Safe Streets and
Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program | US
Department of Transportation
STATE HIGHWAY OPERATION AND
PROTECTION PROGRAM (SHOPP)
The SHOPP program is designed to maintain
the state highway system, however it includes
opportunities to address Complete Streets
elements and improve pedestrian and bicycle
facilities. Program funds can be used for
projects with Complete Streets components
like signage, bike parking, bike lanes,
pedestrian crossing infrastructure, transit
stop improvements, and pedestrian lighting.
Funds can also be used for projects that have
climate action efforts and provide low emission
transportation choices. SHOPP projects are
administered by Caltrans and the California
Transportation Commission. rebuildingca.
ca.gov/state-highway-operation-protection/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA INFILL
INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT PROGRAM
(IIG)
The objective of the IIG program is to promote
infill housing development by providing
financial assistance for Capital Improvement
Projects that are an integral part of, or
necessary to facilitate the development of
affordable and mixed income housing.
Eligible costs include, but are not limited to,
the creation, development, or rehabilitation
of Parks or Open Space; water, sewer or
other utility service improvements (including
internet and electric vehicle infrastructure);
streets; roads; Transit Station Structured
Parking; transit linkages or facilities; facilities
that support pedestrian or bicycle transit;
traffic mitigation, sidewalk, or streetscape
improvements; Factory-Built Housing
components; Adaptive Reuse; and site
preparation or demolition. Infill Infrastructure
Grant Program | California Department of
Housing and Community Development
STATE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (STIP)
The STIP is a multi-year capital improvement
program of transportation projects on and
off the State Highway System, funded with
revenues from the Transportation Investment
Fund and other funding sources. Funding
consists of two components: Caltrans’
Interregional Transportation Improvement
Program (ITIP) and regional transportation
planning agencies’ Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP). Pedestrian and
bicycle projects may be programmed under
ITIP and RTIP. STIP programming occurs every
two years. In 2022, STIP added additional
funding for active transportation improvements.
State Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) | Caltrans
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK
GRANTS
Extended by the BIL, these grants are used
to fund projects that maintain and improve
the transportation performance of federal-
aid highways, bridges, and tunnels, install
pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and
implement transit capital projects. Additional
Transportation Alternatives set aside funds for
active transportation, and active transportation
170
Implementation Yorba Linda-Placentia166
access to transit improvements. STBG -
Federal-aid Programs - Federal-aid Programs
and Special Funding - Federal Highway
Administration (dot.gov)
TRANSFORMATIVE CLIMATE
COMMUNITIES (TCC)
The California Strategic Growth Council funds
community-led development and infrastructure
projects that achieve major environmental,
health, and economic benefits in California’s
most disadvantaged communities. In addition
to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the
goals of the TCC program are to fund projects
which maximize community health and
environmental benefits, avoid displacement,
have comprehensive community involvement,
and offer technical assistance. Previous
rounds have had $115 million available to use
for implementation and planning projects.
Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) -
Strategic Growth Council (ca.gov)
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
FUNDS (TDA)
TDA provides funding from State Transit
Assistance and Local Transportation Fund.
This program funds a variety of transportation
programs including for pedestrians, bicyclists,
and transit facilities. The amount of funding
is based on sales tax collected in each
county. This fund is administered by Caltrans.
Transportation Development Act | Caltrans
URBAN GREENING GRANT PROGRAM
The Urban Greening Program, funded by the
General Fund, is a grant program designed to
promote a comprehensive, long-term approach
to addressing climate change to improve the
environment. Specifically, the program funds
urban greening and urban forestry projects
that reduce greenhouse gas emissions
and provide multiple additional benefits. A
competitive project will maximize opportunities
to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through
project design and implementation as well
as incorporate green infrastructure solutions
that improve the sustainability and function of
existing urban hardscapes and landscapes.
Urban Greening (ca.gov)
Local and Regional
ARTERIAL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
(APM)
The APM program, administered by OCTA,
provides funding for pavement maintenance
and reconstruction. Strategically coordinated
pavement improvements provide an
opportunity to integrate active transportation
striping projects on streets in a cost effective
manner. Additionally, the inclusion of an
existing or new on-street bikeway in a
project yields more points on the APM grant
application. APMFAQ.pdf (octa.net)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(CIP)
Capital Improvement Programs identify
infrastructure projects in a jurisdiction and
forecast budget and timeline information.
OCPW has a 7-year CIP cycle which includes
OCPW projects, OC Parks projects and OC
Libraries projects. The current CIP is active
until 2029 and includes OC Loop bicycle
projects. Projects identified in this Plan may be
eligible to be considered for the next CIP cycle.
Capital Improvement Program | OC Public
Works: Orange County California
171
ImplementationActive Transportation Plan 167
COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION
FUNDING PROGRAM (CTFP)
The CTFP is a collection of grant programs
which fund projects related to street safety
improvements, traffic and pedestrian safety
near schools, and transit improvements
including extensions and stops. The CTFP
streamlines the grant application process
by providing uniform guidelines for multiple
funding programs. Measure M2 provides
funding for many of the programs in the CTFP.
2024 CTFP Guidelines (octa.net)
OCTA MEASURE 2
Measure M2, also known as OC Go, is
a half-cent sales tax for transportation
improvements in Orange County through
2041. Jurisdictions can apply for this grant to
fund transit improvements and programs, and
street pavement improvement projects. OCTA
administers the funding, and the Measure
M Taxpayer Oversight Committee upholds
the integrity of the funds to ensure it is spent
on voter-approved transportation projects.
Environmental Cleanup Program Tier 2 Call
for Projects - Orange County Transportation
Authority (octa.net)
SCAG LOCAL COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT AND SAFETY MINI-
GRANT
This mini-grant program is intended to increase
the safety of those most harmed by traffic
injuries and fatalities. Grants are awarded
to community organizations, nonprofits, and
social enterprises with a focus on organizations
that include members of disadvantaged or
underinvested communities. Mini-grants fund
projects which educate mobility users on safe
practices, increase access to safe routes for
users, and envision safety improvements to
transportation infrastructure that prioritizes
vulnerable users. Example projects include
safety demonstration projects, community
events, and safety campaigns. SCAG’s Go
Human Awards 28 Safety Mini-Grants Across
the Region - Southern California Association
of Governments
SCAG SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
PROGRAM (SCP)
SCAG’s Sustainable Communities Program
has provided resources and assistance to
jurisdictions to complete local planning efforts.
The SCP provides resources to support
active transportation and multimodal efforts
and sustainability, equity in transportation
planning, smart cities, and mobility innovations,
reductions in motorized vehicle miles traveled,
and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
The SCP also supports quick-build projects,
and network visioning to help jurisdictions
install active transportation networks. Awards
of up to $500,000 are available for active
transportation-focused plans. Sustainable
Communities Program - Southern California
Association of Governments
172
173
Appendices07
174
170Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭ /ŶƚƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶ
dŚĞzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;WůĂŶͿWůĂŶΘWŽůŝĐLJZĞǀŝĞǁƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶŽǀĞƌǀŝĞǁŽĨ ĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚůŽĐĂůĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚƐƚƵĚŝĞƐƚŽůĞǀĞƌĂŐĞƌĞůĂƚĞĚŐŽĂůƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJ ĂŶĚĨŝůůŝŶŐĂƉƐĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞŵĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞƚŚĞƉůĂŶƐ͕ŐŽĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚƌĞůĂƚĞ ƚŽŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂůŵŽďŝůŝƚLJŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚƵĚLJĂƌĞĂ͘
WůĂŶƐнWŽůŝĐŝĞƐ
WůĂŶ>ĞĂĚŐĞŶĐLJŽƌŐĞŶĐŝĞƐzĞĂƌŽĨ
ŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶ
^ƚĂƚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ
ĨŽƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϭϮ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐϮϬϮϮ
dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂͲ^ƚĂƚĞ
ŝĐLJĐůĞнWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶWůĂŶ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐϮϬϭϳ
ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůConnect SoCal ‐ The 2024 Regional
dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶͬ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ
ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐLJ
^'ϮϬϮϰ
ŽƵŶƚLJΘDƵůƚŝͲ
:ƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶĂů
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJŝŬĞǁĂLJƐDĂƉKdϮϬϮϮ
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ
^ĐŚŽŽůĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ
Kd͕K,ϮϬϮϭ
>ŽĐĂůzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂϮϬϮϯ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚhƉĚĂƚĞ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂϮϬϮϮ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ>ŽĐĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJ
WůĂŶ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂϮϬϮϮ
WůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗>ĂŶĚhƐĞ͖
DŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ͖,ĞĂůƚŚ͕tĞůůŶĞƐƐ͕
ĂŶĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů:ƵƐƚŝĐĞ͖KƉĞŶ
^ƉĂĐĞĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ŝƚLJŽĨWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂϮϬϭϵ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗
ŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂϮϬϭϲ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
DĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂϮϬϭϰ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗ZŝĚŝŶŐ͕
,ŝŬŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŬĞǁĂLJdƌĂŝůƐ
ŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚ
ŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂϮϬϬϱ
KƚŚĞƌWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ
ĨĨŽƌƚƐ
KĐƚŝǀĞtĞďƐŝƚĞKdE
Appendix A: Previous Plan and Policy Review
175
171Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Appendix A: Previous Plan and Policy Review
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϮ ^ƚĂƚĞWůĂŶƐ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶĨŽƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϭϮ;ϮϬϮϮͿ dŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ;dͿWůĂŶĨŽƌŝƐƚƌŝĐƚϭϮŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŶĞĞĚƐŽŶĂŶĚĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞ ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJ^LJƐƚĞŵ;^,^ͿĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞƐŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐĞŐŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐƚŽŝŶĨůƵĞŶĐĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘ dŚĞdWůĂŶǁĂƐŐƵŝĚĞĚďLJĂŶĚŝƐĂŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƐƚĞƉŝŶŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉůĂŶ͕dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶ ĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ;ϮϬϭϳͿ͘
dŚĞdWůĂŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨƚǁŽĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͗ƚŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĂŶŽŶůŝŶĞ^ƚŽƌLJDĂƉƚŚĂƚŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͕ŶĞĞĚƐ͕ ĂŶĚŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚ͘ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĂŶĚĂŐĞŶĐLJƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐǁŝůůƵƐĞƚŚĞdWůĂŶƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĂĐƚŝǀĞ ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐĂůŽŶŐĂŶĚĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞ^,^ŝŶĨƵƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͘ dŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐŬĞLJĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ^,^ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ • DĂŝŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬŐĂƉƐ
• ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐŝŶĨĂŝƌŽƌƉŽŽƌĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ
• ^ƚƌĞƐƐĨƵůƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ
• /ŶĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ
• ^ƚƌĞƐƐĨƵůďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽƵƚĞƐ
• &ƌĞĞǁĂLJĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐ
dŚĞ^ƵŵŵĂƌLJZĞƉŽƌƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĚĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶŽĨĂƉƌŽĐĞƐƐƵƐĞĚƚŽƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞŶĞĞĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽŶƚŚĞ^,^ĂĐĐŽƌĚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐ ŽĨdŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĚĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͗ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJ͕ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƐƵůƚƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŽŶĂƐƚĂ ƚŝĐ ŵĂƉĂŶĚĂƌĞĂůƐŽĂďůĞƚŽďĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚǀŝĂƚŚĞĐŽŵƉĂŶŝŽŶ^ƚŽƌLJDĂƉ͘
>ĂƐƚůLJ͕ƚŚĞSummary Report includes a list of next steps for implementation of Caltrans’ statewide vision for an improved ǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝŬŝŶŐĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ^,^ŝŶKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐ͗ • >ĞǀĞƌĂŐĞůŽĐĂůƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ
• /ĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶĚŝŶŝƚŝĂƚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
• hƐĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽƐĞůĞĐƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ
• &ƵŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ
• dĂŬĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲůĞǀĞůĂĐƚŝŽŶ
ĂůƚƌĂŶƐdŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ–^ƚĂƚĞŝĐLJĐůĞнWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϳͿ Toward an Active California is Caltrans’ first statewide policy and plan that aims to support bicyclist and pedestrian travel ŝŶŐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŬĞLJŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐ͕ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘/ƚŝƐĂůŽŶŐͲrange plan that identifies the state’s sustainable multiͲŵŽĚĂů ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ͕ƵŶŝƚŝŶŐƐŝdžŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůŵŽĚĂůƉůĂŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞ/ŶƚĞƌƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶ ŝĂ &ƌĞŝŐŚƚDŽďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ƚĂƚĞZĂŝůWůĂŶ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂǀŝĂƚŝŽŶ^LJƐƚĞŵWůĂŶ͕^ƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐWůĂŶ͕ĂŶĚ dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶŝƐĂŶŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĂƐƚĂƚĞǁŝĚĞŐŽĂůƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌŽďƵƐƚŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂů ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŽƉƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĞǀĞƌLJŽŶĞŝŶĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘
dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂƐĞĞŬƐƚŽĨƵůĨŝůůƚŚĞƐŝdžŐŽĂůƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϮϬϰϬ͕ĂŶĚĂŝŵƐƚŽ ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƚĂƌŐĞƚƐƐĞƚŝŶƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ͗ • ŽƵďůĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ƚƌŝƉůĞďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚ͕ĂŶĚĚŽƵďůĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚďLJϮϬϮϬ • ZĞĚƵĐĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĨĂƚĂůŝƚŝĞƐďLJƚĞŶƉĞƌĐĞŶƚƉĞƌLJĞĂƌ • /ŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐďLJƚǁĞŶƚLJƉĞƌĐĞŶƚ 176
172Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϯ dŽǁĂƌĚĂŶĐƚŝǀĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĨŽƵƌŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽƐĂĨĞƚLJ͕ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ͕ƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶ;ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞͿ͕ĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂů ĞƋƵŝƚLJ͖ĨŝĨƚĞĞŶƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͖ĂŶĚƐŝdžƚLJĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƚŽĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚĂůƐŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƐĞǀĞƌĂůĂĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďŝ ůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ ĂŶĚĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŝŵĞĨƌĂŵĞƐĂŶĚĐŽƐƚƐĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ZĞŐŝŽŶĂůWůĂŶƐ
SCAG Connect SoCal ‐ The 202ϰZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶͬ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐLJ;ϮϬϮϰͿ SCAG’s Connect SoCal 2024ͲϮϬϱϬZĞŐŝŽŶĂůdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĂƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵ ƚŚĂƚĞdžƉĂŶĚƐŵŽďŝůŝƚLJŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂĚǀĂŶĐĞƐƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJŐŽĂůƐ͕ĂŶĚƐĞĞŬƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞĨŽƌŽǀĞƌϭϵŵŝůůŝŽŶ ƉĞŽƉůĞǁŚŽůŝǀĞŝŶƚŚĞ^'ŵĞƚƌŽƉŽůŝƚĂŶƌĞŐŝŽŶ͘dŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨŽŶŶĞĐƚ^ŽĂůĨĂůůŝŶƚŽĨŽƵƌĐŽƌĞĐĂƚĞŐŽƌŝĞƐ͗ŵŽďŝůŝƚLJ͕ ŚĞĂůƚŚLJͬƚŚƌŝǀŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĞĐŽŶŽŵLJ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶůŝƐƚƐŐŽĂůƐƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ͕ĞƋƵŝƚLJĂŶĚƌĞƐŝůŝĞŶĐĞĐŽƵƉůĞĚǁŝƚŚƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĂŶĚƚĂƌŐĞƚƐ͘dŚĞŐŽĂůŽĨŽŶŶĞĐƚ^ŽĂůŝƐƚŽďĞƚŚĞ ƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞĂŶĚŐƵŝĚŝŶŐĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjŝŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐďĞŚĂǀŝŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞĂŶĚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌŝŶŐ regional strategies that can shape Southern California’s transportation and land use development in the future. dŚĞ&ŝŶĂů Connect SoCal 2024 Plan was approved by SCAG’s Regional Council in April 2024͘ ŽƵŶƚLJΘDƵůƚŝͲ:ƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶĂůWůĂŶƐ
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJŝŬĞǁĂLJƐDĂƉ;ϮϬϮϮͿ
Available on OCTA’s website, the Orange County Bikeways Map is a map showing bike lanes, routes, and paths throughout KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘dŚĞŵĂƉĂůƐŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉĂƌŬĂŶĚƌŝĚĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕DĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬƐƚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐďŝŬĞ ůĂŶĞƐĂůŽŶŐƐƚĞĞƉŐƌĂĚĞƐ͘^ĞǀĞƌĂůďŝŬĞƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŝƉƐĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐďŝŬĞƐŽŶDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬĂŶĚ KdďƵƐĞƐ͘
KƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϭͿ dŚĞKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůĐƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ;WůĂŶͿƐƵŵŵĂƌŝnjĞĚĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ ^ĐŚŽŽů;^Zd^ͿƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘/ƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĨŽƵƌŵĂŝŶƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ ϭ͘
ƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂĐŽƵŶƚLJǁŝĚĞ^Zd^ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵ
Ϯ͘ ƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶůĂƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐ
ϯ͘ ĞǀĞůŽƉĂĐƵůƚƵƌĞŽĨƐĂĨĞƚLJ
ϰ͘ &ƵŶĚĂŶĚďƵŝůĚƐĂĨĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ
dŚĞWůĂŶŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĂĐƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞƚŚĞƐĞĨŽƵƌƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚ^Zd^ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂĐƌŽƐƐKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘
KdKĐƚŝǀĞtĞďƐŝƚĞ
dŚĞKdĐƚŝǀĞǁĞďƐŝƚĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŝŵĞĚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐŝŶŐŶŽŶ Ͳ ŵŽƚŽƌŝnjĞĚĨŽƌŵƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͕ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ͘/ƚĚĞƚĂŝůƐǀĂƌŝŽƵƐŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŐĞĂƌĞĚ ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ďŝŬŝŶŐ͕ƐŬĂƚŝŶŐ͕ƵƐŝŶŐĂǁŚĞĞůĐŚĂŝƌ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂĐƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞǁĞďƐŝƚĞŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƐƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶŽŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ďŝĐLJĐůĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞK>ŽŽƉ͘/ƚĂůƐŽƐĞƌǀĞƐĂƐĂŚƵďĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚĂŶĚĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐŝŶŐ ƉƵďůŝĐŝŶǀŽůǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶƐŚĂƉŝŶŐĨƵƚƵƌĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞŵŽƌĞůŝǀĂďůĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘
177
173Active Transportation Plan Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϰ >ŽĐĂůWůĂŶƐ
WůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ
WůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϵͿ
>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
The Land Use Element sets the Placentia General Plan’s vision in motion by serving as a long ͲƌĂŶŐĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŐƵŝĚĞĨŽƌ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘/ƚĂŝŵƐƚŽĨƵůĨŝůůƐŝdžŬĞLJĂĐŚŝĞǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ŽĨǁŚŝĐŚĞĂĐŚŝƐĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞĚďLJŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶ ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮ͘ϳŽĨƚŚĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ͗
ϭ͘ ĂůĂŶĐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŐƌŽǁƚŚ
Ϯ͘ ŽŵƉĂƚŝďůĞĂŶĚŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ϯ͘ ZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƵƐĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐ
ϰ͘ WƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨŶĂƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ
ϱ͘ tĞůůĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƉůĂĐĞƐ͕ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞƐ
ϲ͘ WƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ dŚĞ>ĂŶĚhƐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚďŽƚŚƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞƐĂŶĚŝƐƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚďLJƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶĂŶĚŝƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƚŚĞƌŝƚLJƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŽŶŝŶŐDĂƉ͕ŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƉůĂŶƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ agreements and the City’s Capital Improvement Program.ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ 'K>>h–ϱ͗/ŵƉƌŽǀĞƵƌďĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŝƐďŽƚŚĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůůLJĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚ ĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůůLJĐŽŵƉĂƚŝďůĞĂŶĚƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĂďůĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂƌĞĂƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲϱ͘Ϯ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞǀŝƐƵĂůĂŶĚĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶůŝŶŬĂŐĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶĞĚůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůĞƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
'K>>h–ϴ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽĚŝǀĞƌƐŝĨLJƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĐŚŽŝĐĞƐŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲϴ͘ϰ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂůůĐůĂƐƐĞƐŽĨďŝŬĞůĂŶĞƐ͕ďŝŬĞƉĂƚŚƐ͕ĂŶĚďŝŬĞƌŽƵƚĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĐŝƚLJĂƐŶĞǁ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽƌƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲϴ͘ϱ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŶĞǁĂŶĚŝŶŶŽǀĂƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌŝŶŶĞƌĐŝƚLJƚƌĂǀĞůĂŶĚĨŽƌůŽĐĂůƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů ƚƌĂǀĞů͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐŵŽƚŽƌŝnjĞĚďŝŬĞƐ͕ƐĐŽŽƚĞƌƐ͕ƌŝĚĞͲƐŚĂƌĞ͕ĞƚĐ͘ 'K>>h–ϵ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨƉƵďůŝĐŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ>hͲϵ͘ϯ͗Adopt a “Complete Streets” policy, which embodies the community’s intent to plan, design, ŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƐŽƚŚĞLJĂƌĞƐĂĨĞĨŽƌĂůůƵƐĞƌƐŽĨĂůůĂŐĞƐĂŶĚĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚĞƐĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƐŚĂůůŐƵŝĚĞƚŚĞ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞĂůůĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͕ ƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐĂŶĚĨƌĞŝŐŚƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͘
DŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
The Mobility Element represents the City’s overall transportation management plan. The transportation plan includes both ƚŚĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵŝƚƐĞůĨƐƵĐŚĂƐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͕ŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐ͕ƌĂŝůůŝŶĞƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽƵƚĞƐĂŶĚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞ ǀĂƌŝŽƵƐŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐƵĐŚĂƐĐĂƌƐ͕ďƵƐĞƐ͕ƚƌƵĐŬƐ͕ƚƌĂŝŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐ͕ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ŽŶĚĞŵĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ ƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĞƐĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͕ƚŚĞDŽďŝů ŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĂůƐŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞƐŝŶƚĞƌͲĐŽŶŶĞĐƚĞĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŵŽĚĞƐ;ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝŬĞƐŚĂƌĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĂŶĚ bicycles) to the level that recognizes the City’s commitment toward advancing transportation innovation as well as long ƚĞƌŵƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďŝůŝƚLJĂƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶ^ϯϳϱ͘
178
174Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϱ dŚĞDŽďŝůŝƚLJ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶĂďůĞƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĂŶĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶ͘ ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>DK–ϯ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŵŽĚĞƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐ͕ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ ĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚƌĞůĂƚĞĚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϭ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŚŝĐŚŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞŝŶŶŽǀĂƚŝǀĞŵĞƚŚŽĚƐŽĨ ĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĚĞŵĂŶĚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘Ϯ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨĂŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞƐĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶĐLJŽŶ ƚŚĞĂƵƚŽŵŽďŝůĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϯ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĞĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĞŵĂŶĚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ;dDͿŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƐƵĐŚ ĂƐƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚǀĞŚŝĐůĞŽĐĐƵƉĂŶĐLJĂƌĞďĞŝŶŐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĞĚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϰ͗/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐƚŽŵĞĞƚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƵƐĞƐĂŶĚŶĞĞĚƐ͕ǁŚŝĐŚƐĞƌǀĞ ƚŽĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϱ͗ZĞƐƉŽŶĚƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐŝŶĚĞŵĂŶĚĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůďƵƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŝŶƚĞƌĂĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚKdĂŶĚ ŽƚŚĞƌĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĂŶĚƐĞĞŬŽƵƚŐƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂůƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĨŝdžĞĚďƵƐͬƚƌŽůůĞLJƌŽƵƚĞƐŽƌƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚŽŶͲĚĞŵĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ>LJĨƚŽƌhďĞƌ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϲ͗/ŶƐƚĂůůŚĂŶĚŝĐĂƉĂĐĐĞƐƐƌĂŵƉƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚŝƐĂďůĞĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϳ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϴ͗ŽŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĂŶĚĂƐƐŝƐƚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŐĞŶĐLJĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƐďLJŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐ ƉĂƐƐĞŶŐĞƌůŽĂĚŝŶŐƐŝƚĞƐďLJƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐďƵƐďĞŶĐŚĞƐ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞďƵƐƐƚŽƉƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϵ͗tŽƌŬŝŶŐĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝǀĞůLJǁŝƚŚKd͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƐǁĞůůĂƐŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĂŶĚŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƐĞƌǀĞďŽƚŚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂŶĚ ĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƌƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϭϬ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJĂŶĚĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂůůƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞƌƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϯ͘ϭϭ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂŶĚĨƌŽŵƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƌŽƵƚĞƐďLJǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐĂŶĚ ďLJƉĞŽƉůĞǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘
'K>DK–ϰ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞďŝĐLJĐůĞƚƌĂǀĞůĂƐĂƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŵŽĚĞŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞďŝĐLJĐůĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶƚŽƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƌĞŐŝŽŶ͕ƐƚĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĚĨĞĚĞƌĂů ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘Ϯ͗KŶĐĞĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞďŝĐLJĐůĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶŝƐĂĚŽƉƚĞĚ͕ƵƉĚĂƚĞŝƚĂƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJ͗ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůLJ͕ĂĨŝǀĞͲ LJĞĂƌĐLJĐůĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϯ͗ZĞǀŝĞǁƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐůĂƐƐ/͕//ĂŶĚ///ďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐĂŶĚŵŽĚŝĨLJĂƐŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ DĂŶƵĂůŽŶhŶŝĨŽƌŵdƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶƚƌŽůĞǀŝĐĞƐ;DhdͿ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϰ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĚŝƌĞĐƚ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽƵƚĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŵŵƵƚĞƌĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐƚŚĂƚĂůƐŽ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƐĂĨĞƉĂƐƐĂŐĞŽĨĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͘
179
175Active Transportation Plan Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϲ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϱ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŚĞƐĂĨĞĂŶĚĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂŶĚĂĐƌŽƐƐŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚďŝĐLJĐůĞĚĞƚĞĐƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŚĞDhd͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϲ͗/ŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞďŝĐLJĐůĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐŝŶƚŽƚŚĞƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϳ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐƚŚĂƚŵŝŶŝŵŝnjĞĐLJĐůŝƐƚͬŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ'ŽůĚĞŶǀĞŶƵĞƌŝĚŐĞƚŽůŝŶŬĚŝƌĞĐƚůLJƚŽ^ĞŐŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞK>ŽŽƉWƌŽũĞĐƚƚŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌůŝŶŬ ŵƵůƚŝƉůĞďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐŝŶƚŽĂϲϲͲŵŝůĞďƌĂŶĚĞĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶĂŶĚĐĞŶƚƌĂůKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJĂƐǁĞůůĂƐ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞ'ŽWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ>ŽŽƉůŝŶŬŝŶŐƚŚĞWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬ^ƚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽŵĂũŽƌĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐŶĞĂƌĂŶĚ ĂƌŽƵŶĚWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϴ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĂŶĚƐƵďͲƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚǁŚĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐŶĞǁ ŽƌƌĞƚƌŽĨŝƚƚŝŶŐĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƐLJƐƚĞŵƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϵ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĐŽŵƉůLJǁŝƚŚƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚďŝĐLJĐůĞŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŽĨƚŚĞ&ĞĚĞƌĂů,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ;&,tͿ͕ƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ;ĂůƚƌĂŶƐͿĂŶĚƚŚĞŵĞƌŝĐĂŶƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ,ŝŐŚǁĂLJĂŶĚdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶKĨĨŝĐŝĂůƐ;^,dKͿ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϬ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĨĨŽƌƚƐƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶ͕ĞdžƉĂŶĚĂŶĚĐƌĞĂƚĞŶĞǁĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ ďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͕ƚŚĞďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐŝŶŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϭ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐƐĂĨĞƌĂŶĚŵŽƌĞĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶƚĨŽƌĂůů ƚLJƉĞƐŽĨĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϮ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐŽŶũƵŶĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚůŽĐĂůďŝĐLJĐůĞƐŚŽƉƐ͕ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚ ĂĚǀŽĐĂƚĞƐƚŽĨŽƐƚĞƌƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞƌŝĚĞƌƐŚŝƉĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϯ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞƐĂĨĞƌƚƌĂǀĞůďLJďŝĐLJĐůĞƚŽŬĞLJĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌƌĞŐŝŽŶ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŶĞǁDĞƚƌŽůŝŶŬƐƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϰ͗ZĞƋƵŝƌĞƚŚĂƚŶĞǁƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƌŝŐŚƚ ͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĨŽƌďŝĐLJĐůĞůĂŶĞƐ͕ ǁŚĞƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϱ͗tŚĞƌĞƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƌŽĂĚǁĂLJĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJĞdžŝƐƚ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŝŶƐƚĂůůďŝŬĞ ƌŽƵƚĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϲ͗Work with the Orange County Flood Control District under the City and District’s cooperative ĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚƵƚŝůŝnjĞŝƐƚƌŝĐƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂĂƐŽĨĨͲƌŽĂĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůďŝŬĞƚƌĂŝůƐĂŶĚůŽŽƉ ĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽŽƚŚĞƌĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŽƌƉůĂŶŶĞĚŽŶͲƐƚƌĞĞƚďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϳ͗^ĞĞŬŽƵƚŐƌĂŶƚĨƵŶĚŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽĨƵŶĚƚŚĞĐŽƐƚŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŽĨĨͲƌŽĂĚďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϴ͗ZĞĚƵĐĞŽƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŽŶĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůƌŽĂĚƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌĞdžƉĂŶĚŝŶŐůĂƐƐ//ďŝĐLJĐůĞ ůĂŶĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϰ͘ϭϵ͗WůĂŶĨŽƌĂŶĚŐŝǀĞĐĂƌĞĨƵůĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ĚĞǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŝƌƵƐĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐͲƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨǁĂLJ͘ 180
176Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϳ 'K>DK–ϲ͗ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĂŶĚĐŽŽƉĞƌĂƚĞǁŝƚŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƚŚĞŽƵŶƚLJĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĂŶĚ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĐŽŶŐĞƐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJDKͲϲ͘ϱtŽƌŬǁŝƚŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽůŝŶŬƵƉďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƚƌĂŝůƐƚŽĞdžƉĂŶĚ ƚŚĞŝƌƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƌĞĂĐŚĂŶĚďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐƚŽƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘
,ĞĂůƚŚ͕tĞůůŶĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů:ƵƐƚŝĐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
dŚĞ,ĞĂůƚŚ͕tĞůůŶĞƐƐ͕ĂŶĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů:ƵƐƚŝĐĞ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞƐƚŚĞǁĂLJƐĂĐŝƚLJĐĂŶƉƌŽŵŽƚĞĂŶĚŝŶĨůƵĞŶĐĞŚĞĂůƚŚLJ ůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐǀŝĂĞƋƵĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƉůĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĂŬĞĂŶĚŬĞĞƉĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐŚĞĂůƚŚLJ͘^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬ͘ϴŽĨƚŚĞ ůĞŵĞŶƚ
ĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞƐƚŚĞǁĂLJƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚǁĂůŬĂďůĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐ ĂŵƉůĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐĐĂŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŚĞĂůƚŚŝĞƌĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚĨŽƐƚĞƌĞƋƵĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐ ĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>,tͬ
:–Ϯ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐ͕ďŽƚŚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐ͕ƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͕ďŝŬŝŶŐ ĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂƐĂŵĞĂŶƐƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƌĂƚĞƐŽĨŽďĞƐŝƚLJ͕ŚĞĂƌƚĚŝƐĞĂƐĞ͕ĚŝĂďĞƚĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŚĞĂůƚŚ ͲƌĞůĂƚĞĚŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϮ͘ϭ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂŵĞŶĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞƚŽĂůůŽǁŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚͲƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƌĞƚĂŝůƵƐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĂƚŬĞLJŶŽĚĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƌĞƚĂŝůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶĞͲƋƵĂƌƚĞƌŵŝůĞŽĨĂůůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐ͘ WĞƌŵŝƚƚŚĞƐĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚͲƐĞƌǀŝŶŐƵƐĞƐǁŝƚŚƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϮ͘Ϯ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉůĞĂƐĂŶƚƉůĂĐĞƐŝŶǁŚŝĐŚŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌƐĐĂŶŵĞĞƚ͕ĐŽŶŐƌĞŐĂƚĞ͕ ĂŶĚďĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůůLJĂĐƚŝǀĞƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϮ͘ϯ͗&ŽƌŵƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐǁŝƚŚƐĐŚŽŽůĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŶŽŶͲƉƌŽĨŝƚ ŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞŽƌŐĂŶŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂŐĞŶĐŝĞƐƚŽĨŽƐƚĞƌĂŶĚƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞŝŶĞĨĨŽƌƚƐ ƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐŚĞĂůƚŚLJůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐ͕ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJĂŶĚƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŚĞĂůƚŚŽƵƚĐŽŵĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϮ͘ϱ͗ZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƌĞĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƐƉĂĐĞƐĂŶĚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞŐƌĞĂƚĞƌ ŽƵƚĚŽŽƌƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϮ͘ϲ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĨƌĞĞŽƌƐƵďƐŝĚŝnjĞĚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĞdžĞƌĐŝƐĞĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚŝŶƉƵďůŝĐĂƌĞĂƐŶŽƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƵƐĞĚĨŽƌ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ͘
'K>,tͬ
:–ϯ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŚŝŐŚͲƋƵĂůŝƚLJƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŶĞƚǁŽƌŬƐŽƚŚĂƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĨƌŽŵĂůůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĐĂŶƐĂĨĞůLJǁĂůŬƚŽ ƚŚĞŝƌĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϯ͘ϭ͗^ƚƌŝǀĞƚŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬĚĞĨŝĐŝĞŶĐŝĞƐŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϯ͘Ϯ͗DĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐĂĨĞƚLJĂƚƌŽĂĚǁĂLJĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨŵĂƌŬĞĚĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐ͕ŚŝŐŚͲǀŝƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŵĂƌŬŝŶŐƐ͕ĂŶĚƉŚLJƐŝĐĂů ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŝƐůĂŶĚƐ͕ƌĂŝƐĞĚĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐ͕ĐƵƌďĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ͕ƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƌĂĚŝŝĂƚŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ ƉĞƌƉĞŶĚŝĐƵůĂƌĐƵƌďƌĂŵƉƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐŬŶŽǁŶƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJ͘ƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ ŽŶDĞůƌŽƐĞǀĞŶƵĞĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞtŚŝƚƚĞŶĞŶƚĞƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϯ͘ϯ͗/ŵƉƌŽǀĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐŽŶƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͕ďƵƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŝŶŚŝŐŚͲǀŽůƵŵĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϯ͘ϰ͗WƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞƐĂŶĚĂƌĞĂƐ ĂƌŽƵŶĚƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͘
181
177Active Transportation Plan Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϴ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϯ͘ϱ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶǀŽůǀŝŶŐůĂŶĚƵƐĞĂŶĚnjŽŶŝŶŐĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĚĂŝůLJƌĞƚĂŝůŶĞĞĚƐ͕ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐƚŽƉƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂǁĂůŬĂďůĞĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ;ŝ͘Ğ͕͘ĂƋƵĂƌƚĞƌ ͲƚŽĂ ŚĂůĨͲŵŝůĞͿŽĨĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϯ͘ϲ͗DĂŬĞƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞƐŵŽƌĞǀŝƐƵĂůůLJĂƉƉĞĂůŝŶŐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůLJĨƌŝĞŶĚůLJďLJ ƉůĂŶƚŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƚƌĞĞƐ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐ͕ĂĚĚŝŶŐĚĞĐŽƌĂƚŝǀĞƐƚƌĞĞƚĨƵƌŶŝƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƌĞŐƵůĂƌůLJĐůĞĂŶŝŶŐƚŚĞ ƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĂŶĚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ3.7: Develop public art, fountains and other forms that beautify Placentia’s streets and provide a ĐŽůůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚŽƵƚĚŽŽƌĂƌƚǁŽƌŬƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘/ĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĨƵŶĚůŽĐĂů ĂƌƚŝƐƚƐĂŶĚƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞƉƵďůŝĐĂƌƚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:–ϰ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨĚĂŝůLJŐŽŽĚƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĐŽŵĨŽƌƚĂďůĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϰ͘ϯ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶƐĨŽƌŬĞLJĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJƚŽŐƵŝĚĞ ƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĂƌĞĂƐŝŶƚŽŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐĂŶĚŶŽĚĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϰ͘ϰ͗&ƵůůLJŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞKůĚdŽǁŶZĞǀŝƚĂůŝnjĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐŝƚKƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞ͕ĂƐƚŚŽƐĞĂƌĞĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞƐĞƉůĂŶƐ͕ƚŚĂƚĂĨƵůůƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƌĞƚĂŝůĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ĂƌĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐŽƌĞĂƐLJƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϰ͘ϱ͗hƉĚĂƚĞŽŶŝŶŐŽĚĞƚŽĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĂŶLJďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŐŽĂůŽĨĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐǁŝƚŚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƌĞƚĂŝůĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:–ϱ͗^ĞĞŬƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂůůƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞ͕ ĞŵĞƌŐĞŶĐLJƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĐĞŶƚĞƌƐĨŽƌĂůůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJƚŚŽƐĞŝŶƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:–ϱ͘ϭ͗ZĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨŽƌĐĂƌĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐ͕ ĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĞĨĨŽƌƚƐŝŶƉƵďůŝĐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶŶŽƵŶĐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĐŝƚLJĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚŶĞǁƐůĞƚƚĞƌƐ͘DĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĚĂƚĂ ŽŶĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŚŝŐŚŝŶĐŝĚĞŶĐĞƐŽĨďŝĐLJĐůĞͬƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬǀĞŚŝĐůĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘Ϯ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶƐŽŶƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐ ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŽƉƚŝŽŶƐ͘
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŶĐĞŶƚŝǀĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘ ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ
ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚĂƌŐĞƚŝŶŐďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐĂŶĚŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŽŶĂůĞǀĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ ďŝĐLJĐůĞƌŽĚĞŽƐĂŶĚĨƌĞĞŚĞůŵĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶĞǀĞŶƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϯ͗
džĞĐƵƚĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞĂŶĚŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϰ͗/ŶŶĞǁƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƐƚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŝƚLJŽĨďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƚŽ ĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĂŶĚĂƐĂŵĞĂŶƐŽĨŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐůĞǀĞůƐŽĨƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϲ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽƉƵƌƐƵĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌƐƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨƉĂƌĂͲƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞĨŽƌƐĞŶŝŽƌƐĂŶĚƉĞŽƉůĞŽĨĂůůĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞ ǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚƚŽƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉƵďůŝĐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŵĞĚŝĐĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϳ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞƵƌďĂŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŚĂƚďĂůĂŶĐĞƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ǁĂůŬŝŶŐĂŶĚďŝĐLJĐůŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌ ŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂǀĞůďLJĂĚŽƉƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐĂŽŵƉůĞƚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϴ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŽĐĂůŵƚƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐƚŚĂƚĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞƐƉĞĞĚŝŶŐŽƌĐƵƚͲƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͘ /ŶĐůƵĚĞĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͘ 182
178Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϵ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϵ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĐĂƉĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͕ƐĂĨĞƚLJĂŶĚ ĞdžƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͕ƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚŵŽƚŽƌŝƐƚƐ͘&ŽĐƵƐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐŝŶĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚ ŶĞĞĚ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞKůĚdŽǁŶ͕Ɛ͕ŵŝdžĞĚͲƵƐĞĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐ͕ĂŶĚŬĞLJŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϭϬ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĞĐƵƌĞďŝĐLJĐůĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚƐƚŽƌĂŐĞŝŶĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ5.11: Facilitate street closures for farmers’ markets, arts and craft fairs, CicLAvía events (bicycle and ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĞǀĞŶƚƐͿ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƵďůŝĐĞǀĞŶƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϭϰ͗ƌĞĂƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůŝnjĞĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĨŽƌƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐůŝǀŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĐŚƌŽŶŝĐĚŝƐĞĂƐĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ͕ĚŝĂďĞƚĞƐĂŶĚ ŚĞĂƌƚĚŝƐĞĂƐĞ͕ƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJĞĂƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŚĞĂůƚŚĐĂƌĞĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϭϳ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞŵŽƌĞĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐǁŝƚŚƉƵďůŝĐĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚƵƐĞƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂLJ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϭϴ͗ĚŽƉƚĂĐŝƚLJͲǁŝĚĞďŝĐLJĐůĞŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞǀĞŶƚƵĂůůLJĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐƚŽƌĞƚĂŝůĂƌĞĂƐ͕ ƉĂƌŬ͕ƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ĂŶĚŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚŝƐƉůĂŶǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƚŽďŝŬĞƚƌĂŝůƐŝŶ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚĐŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϱ͘ϭϵ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞĂƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƐĂĨĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJ͕ĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞůŝĨĞƐƚLJůĞƐ͕ďLJƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂůĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚLJďĞƚǁĞĞŶƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ĂŶĚKůĚdŽǁŶ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:–ϲ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚĂůůĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶŚĂǀĞƐĂĨĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϲ͘ϭ͗WƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƐĂĨĞƚLJĂƌŽƵŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͕ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ƉƌĞƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŚŝůĚĐĂƌĞĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϲ͘Ϯ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞdžĞĐƵƚŝŽŶŽĨĂ^ĂĨĞZŽƵƚĞƐƚŽ^ĐŚŽŽůƉůĂŶĨŽƌĂůůWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͘WƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŚŝŐŚĞƐƚƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͘&ŽĐƵƐŝŶŝƚŝĂůĞĨĨŽƌƚƐŽŶƚŚĞƌŽƵƚĞŽǀĞƌƚŚĞϱϳ&ƌĞĞǁĂLJ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϲ͘ϯ͗/ŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐĂůŵŝŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐŝŶĂƌĞĂƐŝŵŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůLJĂƌŽƵŶĚƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳ6.4: Encourage the creation of “Walking School Bus,” “Biking School Bus,” “Bicycle Trains,” contests ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŚĂƚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĐŚŝůĚƌĞŶƚŽǁĂůŬŽƌďŝĐLJĐůĞƚŽƐĐŚŽŽůĂŶĚŵĂŬĞŝƚƐĂĨĞƌƚŽĚŽƐŽ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϲ͘ϱ͗tŽƌŬĐŽůůĂďŽƌĂƚŝǀĞůLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐĐŚŽŽůĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůďŽĂƌĚ͕Wd͕ĂŶĚƐƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶĚ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƐĐŚŽŽůĂĐĐĞƐƐĂŶĚƐĂĨĞƚLJŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘&ŽƌŵĂƐĐŚŽŽůƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞƚŚĂƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŵĞŵďĞƌƐŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŐƌŽƵƉƐ ĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƚLJĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ͕WƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ͕ĂŶĚWŽůŝĐĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϲ͘ϲ͗
ŶŚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚůŝŐŚƚƐŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐĂĨĞƚLJĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐ͕ƚŚĞĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐƵƐĞĚďLJƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJ ǁŚĞƌĞƚŚŽƐĞĐƌŽƐƐǁĂůŬƐĂƌĞƵƐĞĚďLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŐŽŝŶŐƚŽƐĐŚŽŽů͕ƚŚĞƉĂƌŬ͕ŽƌĂůŽĐĂůƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌ͘ 'K>,tͬ
:–ϳ͗
ŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƚƌĂŝůƐ͕ŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂĐƚŝǀĞ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚLJƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ ĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂĂŶĚĂƌĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƚŽƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽĨĚŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘Ϯ͗^ĞĞŬŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽĐŽŶǀĞƌƚƉƵďůŝĐĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƵƚŝůŝƚLJĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌƐĂŶĚƉĂƌŬǁĂLJǀŝƐƚĂƐ͕ ŝŶƚŽƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϰ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǁŝĚĞƌĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚƉĂƐƐŝǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĂůůƉĂƌŬƐƚŚĂƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƚŽ ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨŵƵůƚŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϳ͗
džƉĂŶĚĂŶĚƚĂŝůŽƌƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐƚŽŵĞĞƚĞǀŽůǀŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ needs. Programs and services should remain accessible and relevant to today’s residents, responding to unique ĐƵůƚƵƌĂů͕ŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂŶĚƐŽĐŝĂůŶĞĞĚƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐĐŚĂŶŐŝŶŐĚĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐƐĂŶĚŝŶĐŽŵĞůĞǀĞůƐ͘ 183
179Active Transportation Plan Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϬ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϴ͗ŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐ͕ƐŝŐŶĂŐĞ͕ŚŽƵƌƐ ŽĨŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞŽĨƚŚĞŵƵůƚŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚŝŶĐŽŵĞůĞǀĞůƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘ WƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĨĂĐŝůŝƚLJƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐŵĂLJŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJƚŽĂƚƚƌĂĐƚƉĞŽƉůĞĨƌŽŵŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJ ƵŶĚĞƌƐĞƌǀĞĚ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϵ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽŶŽŶͲŝƚLJŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĚƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϭϯ͗ĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚĂĚŽƉƚĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚĚĞƚĞƌĐƌŝŵŝŶĂůĂĐƚŝǀŝƚLJŝŶŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͕ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚ ƉƵďůŝĐĂƌĞĂƐ͘/ŶĐůƵĚĞŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƉůĂLJĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐƉŽƌƚƐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ƐƚƌĞĞƚƐĂŶĚƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐ͕ƉůĂnjĂƐ ĂŶĚƵƌďĂŶƉŽĐŬĞƚƉĂƌŬƐ͕ĂŶĚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůƐŝƚĞƐ͕ĂŵŽŶŐŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϭϰ͗^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞŝƚLJͲǁŝĚĞŝŶŝƚŝĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚĞdžƚĞƌŶĂůƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ ĨŽƌĐŽŶƚĂĐƚǁŝƚŚŶĂƚƵƌĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϳ͘ϭϱ͗ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĐŝƚLJǁŝĚĞďŝŬĞƐŚĂƌĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘
'K>,tͬ
:–ϭϬ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚƌĞĚƵĐĞŐƌĞĞŶŚŽƵƐĞŐĂƐĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞ ƌĞƐƉŝƌĂƚŽƌLJŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ĞŶŚĂŶĐĞĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚƌĞĚƵĐĞĐůŝŵĂƚĞĐŚĂŶŐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŝŶĚŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞĚĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϭϬ͘ϭ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ĐLJĐůŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƵƐĞ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:ͲϭϬ͘ϯ͗WƵƌƐƵĞĨƵŶĚŝŶŐĨŽƌĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚ ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJ͘
'K>,tͬ
:–ϭϯ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞŐƌĞĞŶ͕ĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞƐƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŚĞĂůƚŚLJůŽĐĂů ĞĐŽŶŽŵLJ͕ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞŶĂƚƵƌĂůĂŶĚďƵŝůƚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞĂŝƌƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞĨŽƌĂůů ƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJ,tͬ
:Ͳϭϯ͘ϭϬ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĂŵŝdž ŽĨƵƐĞƐ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůLJŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐĞƌǀŝŶŐďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶǁĂůŬŝŶŐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨŚŽŵĞƐĂŶĚǁŽƌŬƉůĂĐĞƐ͘ ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞ
ŵƵůƚŝͲŵŽĚĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĂŵŝdž ŽĨƵƐĞƐ͘
KƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ
dŚĞKƉĞŶ^ƉĂĐĞĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŚĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐĂŶĚĂĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƉƌĞƐĞƌǀĞĂŶĚĞŶŚĂŶĐĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂƌĞĂƐŝŶ ƚŚĞŝƚLJĂŶĚŵĞĞƚƚŚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůŶĞĞĚƐŽĨŝƚƐƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘KƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞƉĂƌŬƐ͕ƐĐŚŽŽůƐ͕ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞůLJͲŽǁŶĞĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͕ƚƌĂŝůǁĂLJƐ͕ŐŽůĨĐŽƵƌƐĞƐĂŶĚŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚƐƌĂŶŐŝŶŐ ĨƌŽŵƉĂƐƐŝǀĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƚŽĂĐƚŝǀĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƐŝƚĞƐ͘ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ 'K>K^ΘZ–ϭWƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶͬƉĂƌŬĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĨŽƌĂůůƚŚŽƐĞǁŚŽůŝǀĞĂŶĚǁŽƌŬŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲϭ͘Ϯ͗ƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĂŶŶƵĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƉůĂŶƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞŶƐƵƌĞĂůůŽĨƚŚĞĐŝƚLJƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞ͕ƐĂĨĞ͕ĂŶĚƵƐĞĂďůĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ͘&ŽĐƵƐŽŶŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚ ƌĞŶŽǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƵƉŐƌĂĚĞƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐŽĨĂůůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĂƌĞŵĞƚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲϭ͘ϯ͗WůĂŶƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚƵƚŝůŝnjĞŽƵƌŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐƚŽ ƚŚĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵĞdžƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲϭ͘ϴ͗
ǀĂůƵĂƚĞĂŶĚ͕ǁŚĞƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ƵƚŝůŝnjĞƚŚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐŽĨĨĞƌĞĚďLJĂďĂŶĚŽŶĞĚƌŽĂĚĂŶĚƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ ƌŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂŶĚƐŝŵŝůĂƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůůLJŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚŽƌƵŶƵƐĞĚůŝŶĞĂƌŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚůŽǁŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ ŐƌĞĞŶďĞůƚƐĂŶĚŵƵůƚŝͲƵƐĞƚƌĂŝůƐ͘
184
180Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϭ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲϭ͘ϭϭ͗ƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͕ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐĂƐŽŶĞŵĞĂŶƐĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨ ŽŵƉůĞƚĞ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZͲϭ͘ϭϮ͗ƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĐĐƵƌƐ͕ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŽƚŚĞKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJŝŬĞ >ŽŽƉ͘
'K>K^ΘZ–ϯWƌĞƐĞƌǀĞŽƉĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨůŝĨĞŝŶWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJK^ΘZ–ϯ͘ϳ͗Conserve Placentia’s flood control facilities as appropriate to protect the public health, safety, ĂŶĚǁĞůĨĂƌĞĂŶĚĐƌĞĂƚĞƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶĂůŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐďŝŬĞƚƌĂŝůƐǁŚĞƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϯͿ
The ADA Transition Plan is used to document physical accessibility barriers to the City’s programs, services, and activities ĂŶĚƚŽŽƵƚůŝŶĞĂƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞͬƉůĂŶ;ŽƌƚŚĞďĂƐŝƐƚŽƉƌŽĚƵĐĞŽŶĞͿĨŽƌǁŚŝĐŚƚŚĞŝƚLJƐŚĂůůĨŽůůŽǁƚŽƚƌĂŶƐŝƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵĂƐƚĂƚĞŽĨ ŶŽŶĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞƚŽĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͘
dŚŝƐƉůĂŶ͗
• /ĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůŽďƐƚĂĐůĞƐŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐĞŶƚŝƚLJΖƐWƵďůŝĐZŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲtĂLJƚŚĂƚůŝŵŝƚƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŽĨŝƚƐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŽƌ ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƚŽŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƐǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͖
• ƐƐĞƐƐĞƐƚŚĞĞdžƚĞŶƚŽĨĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŝŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚƐ ͲŽĨͲǁĂLJĂŶĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐ͕ƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŽƉĞƌĂƚĞĚďLJƚŚĞŝƚLJ͖ • ĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐŝŶĚĞƚĂŝůƚŚĞŵĞƚŚŽĚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽŵĂŬĞƚŚĞWƵďůŝĐZŝŐŚƚƐͲŽĨͲtĂLJĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďůĞ͖ •
ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĐŽƐƚƐĨŽƌŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽůƵƚŝŽŶƐ͖
• ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĞƐƚŚĞƐƚĞƉƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌLJƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶĐĞ͖ • WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĨŽƌďĂƌƌŝĞƌƌĞŵŽǀĂůͬŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ͖
• ^ĞƚƐƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌďĂƌƌŝĞƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ͖ĂŶĚ
• /ŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƚŚĞŽĨĨŝĐŝĂůƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉůĂŶ͘ The plan also scores each feature’s expected frequency of use and the barrier to implementation to attempt to prioritize ĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞƚŚĞůĂƌŐĞƐƚŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂLJĂŶĚĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJĨŽƌƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚĚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚhƉĚĂƚĞ;ϮϬϮϮͿ
dŚĞGeneral Plan Housing Element discusses how Yorba Linda will develop local housing programs to meet its “fair share” of ĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐĨŽƌĂůůŝŶĐŽŵĞŐƌŽƵƉƐ͘dŚĞĐŚĂƉƚĞƌƐĞƚƐĨŽƌƚŚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽĞŶĂĐƚůĂŶĚƵƐĞƉůĂŶƐĂŶĚ ƌĞŐƵůĂƚŽƌLJƐLJƐƚĞŵƐƚŚĂƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌ͕ĂŶĚĚŽŶŽƚƵŶĚƵůLJĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞƐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚĨŽĐƵƐŽŶ͗ϭͿƉƌĞƐĞƌǀŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐŚŽƵƐŝŶŐĂŶĚ ŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐ͖ϮͿƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐŝƚĞƐ͖ϯͿĂƐƐŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͖ϰͿƌĞŵŽǀŝŶŐ ŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶǀĞƐƚŵĞŶƚ͖ĂŶĚϱͿƉƌŽŵŽƚŝŶŐĨĂŝƌĂŶĚĞƋƵŝƚĂďůĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘ 185
181Active Transportation Plan Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϮ ^ŽŵĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>ϯ–WƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƐŝƚĞƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĂĐŚŝĞǀĞĂǀĂƌŝĞƚLJĂŶĚĚŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϯ͘ϭ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞƐŝƚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĂƚƌĞƐƉŽŶĚƐƚŽĚŝǀĞƌƐĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐŝŶ ƚĞƌŵƐŽĨŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚLJƉĞƐ͕ĐŽƐƚĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĞŵƉŚĂƐŝnjŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŶĞĂƌƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞ ǁĂůŬĂďŝůŝƚLJ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϯ͘Ϯ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞŚŝŐŚĞƌĚĞŶƐŝƚLJŚŽƵƐŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚƌĂĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůLJĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĂƌĞĂƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐ ^ĂǀŝZĂŶĐŚĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƐĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϯ͘ϯ͗WƵƌƐƵĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŽŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝŶƵŶĚĞƌƵƚŝůŝnjĞĚĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĐĞŶƚĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƚŽƌĞƵƐĞĞdžĐĞƐƐŽƌ ŽďƐŽůĞƚĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĨŽƌŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
'K>ϰ–ZĞĚƵĐĞŐŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚĂůĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚǁŚŝůĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJϰ͘ϭ͗WƌŽǀŝĚĞĨůĞdžŝďŝůŝƚLJŝŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞŶĞǁŵŽĚĞůƐĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐƚŽ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚͲŽƌŝĞŶƚĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ůŝǀĞͬǁŽƌŬŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͕ŵŝĐƌŽƵŶŝƚƐ͕ĂŶĚĨůĞdžƐƉĂĐĞƚŽ ĂůůŽǁŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƚŽĂĚĂƉƚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞĞĚƐŽĨƚŚĞŽĐĐƵƉĂŶƚƐ
^ŽŵĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
ϴĂ͘>ŽƚŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶWƌŽŐƌĂŵ
dŚĞƐƵĐĐĞƐƐŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƐĞǀĞƌĂůŽĨƚŚĞƌĞnjŽŶĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƐŝƚĞƐǁŝůůďĞĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚƵƉŽŶĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ ŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƉĂƌĐĞůƐŝŶƚŽůĂƌŐĞƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝƚĞƐ͘tŚŝůĞƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůƉĂƌĐĞůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐĞƌĞnjŽŶĞĂƌĞĂƐĂƌĞĂůƌĞĂĚLJ ƵŶĚĞƌĐŽŵŵŽŶŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ͕ŵŽƐƚĂƌĞŝŶĚŝǀŝĚƵĂůůLJŽǁŶĞĚ͘dŚĞŝƚLJǁŝůůĐŽŶĚƵĐƚŽƵƚƌĞĂĐŚƚŽƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞƐĞĂƌĞĂƐ ƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJŵĞĂŶŝŶŐĨƵůŝŶĐĞŶƚŝǀĞƐƚŽĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞůŽƚĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚŝƐĨĞĞĚďĂĐŬ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŶĞLJĞĂƌ ŽĨ,ŽƵƐŝŶŐ
ůĞŵĞŶƚĂĚŽƉƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝůůĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂ>ŽƚŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƚŽŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŝŶĐĞŶƚŝǀĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐ͗ • Flexible development standards such as reduced setbacks, increased lot coverage, increased heights, reduced ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ
• Reduced fees
• Streamlined permit processing through administrative staff review hƉŽŶĂĚŽƉƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝůůǁŽƌŬŝŶƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉǁŝƚŚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƌĞĐĞƉƚŝǀĞƚŽůŽƚ ĐŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚƚŚĞŵŝŶĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůŵĞƌŐĞƉƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶĂƐƚƌĞĂŵůŝŶĞĚĂŶĚƚŝŵĞůLJŵĂŶŶĞƌ͘ ϭϱ͘DƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚWƌŽĐĞƐƐŝŶŐWƌŽĐĞĚƵƌĞƐ͘ dŚĞŝƚLJĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌŝƚƐZͲDͲϮϬĂŶĚZͲDͲϯϬŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJnjŽŶĞƐŝŶĐŽŶƐƵůƚĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂŶƵƌďĂŶ ĚĞƐŝŐŶƉƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞŝƌĐƵŵƵůĂƚŝǀĞŝŵƉĂĐƚĚŝĚŶŽƚĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚLJƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞŵĂdžŝŵƵŵnjŽŶĞĚĚĞŶƐŝƚŝĞƐ͘/Ŷ ƚĂŶĚĞŵǁŝƚŚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŝŶŐƚŚĞŶĞǁŚŝŐŚĞƌĚĞŶƐŝƚLJnjŽŶŝŶŐ͕zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĚƚŚĞƉƌŝŽƌŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůhƐĞ WĞƌŵŝƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚDƵůƚŝͲ&ĂŵŝůLJĞƐŝŐŶ'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƵƉĨƌŽŶƚĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƚŚĞĚĞƐŝƌĞĚƋƵĂůŝƚLJĂŶĚĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŽĨŵƵůƚŝͲĨĂŵŝůLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂŚĂƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞĚĂƌĞǀŝĞǁ ƉƌŽĐĞƐƐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐǁŚŝĐŚĨĂĐŝůŝƚĂƚĞ͕ĂŶĚĚŽŶŽƚƐĞƌǀĞƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶ͕ƋƵĂůŝƚLJŵƵůƚŝ ͲĨĂŵŝůLJ ŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
186
182Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϯ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ>ŽĐĂůZŽĂĚǁĂLJ^ĂĨĞƚLJWůĂŶ;ϮϬϮϮͿ
The City of Yorba Linda’s Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) is a comprehensive plan that creates a framework to ƐLJƐƚĞŵŝĐĂůůLJŝĚĞŶƚŝĨLJĂŶĚĂŶĂůLJnjĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJƌĞůĂƚĞĚŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂŶĚĐŽƵŶƚĞƌŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐ͘dŚĞ>Z^WĂŝŵƐ ƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĨĂƚĂůĂŶĚƐĞǀĞƌĞŝŶũƵƌLJ;&н^/ͿĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂƉƌŝŽƌŝƚŝnjĞĚůŝƐƚŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚĐĂŶĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƐĂĨĞƚLJŽŶůŽĐ Ăů ƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐ͘dŚĞ>Z^WƚĂŬĞƐĂƉƌŽĂĐƚŝǀĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐŝŶŐƐĂĨĞƚLJŶĞĞĚƐ͘/ƚŝƐǀŝĞǁĞĚĂƐĂŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞ ĂƐŽƵƌĐĞŽĨŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŝĚĞĂƐ͘ dŚĞWůĂŶĂŶĂůLJnjĞƐĐƌĂƐŚĞƐĂŶĚƌŽĂĚǁĂLJƐĂĨĞƚLJĂƚĞĂĐŚŵĂũŽƌŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĂƌƚĞƌŝĂůŝŶ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĂŶĚŵĂŬĞƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞĨŽƌŵŽĨĂƚƌĂĨĨŝĐƐĂĨĞƚLJƚŽŽůďŽdžƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐƚŚĞŝƐƐƵĞƐĂƚŵĂũŽƌƉƌŽďůĞŵ ĂƌĞĂƐ͘
ZĞůĞǀĂŶƚĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
• ďŽƵƚϱϮйŽĨ&н^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŚĂǀĞŽĐĐƵƌƌĞĚĂƚŶŝŐŚƚ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂŽƵůĞǀĂƌĚ͕sĂůůĞLJsŝĞǁǀĞŶƵĞ͕ĂŶĚ>ĂWĂůŵĂ ǀĞŶƵĞŚĂǀĞĂŚŝŐŚĞƌĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨŶŝŐŚƚƚŝŵĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚƚŽŽƚŚĞƌƌŽĂĚƐŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͘dŚŝƐŵĂLJ ŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƚŚĂƚůŝŐŚƚŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞƐĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞůƵŵĞŶůĞǀĞůƐĂƌĞĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞ͘ • &Žƌ&н^/ĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͕ϯϰйŽĨĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐǁĞƌĞďƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐ͘dŚŝƐĐĂůůƐĨŽƌĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŶŐ ďƌŽĂĚƐŝĚĞĐŽůůŝƐŝŽŶƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŚŝŐŚŝŶũƵƌLJŶĞƚǁŽƌŬĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞŝƚLJǁŝƚŚƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ͘/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƚƚŚĞƐĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŵĂLJĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚƐŝŐŶĂůŚĂƌĚǁĂƌĞͬůĂƌŐĞƌƐŝŐŶĂůŚĞĂĚƐ͕ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚůĞĨƚƚƵƌŶƉŚĂƐĞ͕ĐŽŶǀĞƌƚƐŝŐŶĂůƚŽŵĂƐƚĂƌŵ;ĨƌŽŵƉĞĚĞƐƚĂůͲŵŽƵŶƚĞĚͿ͕ƌĂŝƐĞĚŵĞĚŝĂŶƐĂƚƚŚĞ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƚŽŝŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌƐ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗ŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚ;ϮϬϭϲͿ
dŚĞŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĨƌĂŵĞǁŽƌŬĨŽƌĂĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵĨŽƌƚŚĞ ŝƚLJƚŚĂƚƉƌŽŵŽƚĞƐƚŚĞƐĂĨĞ͕ĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƌĞůŝĂďůĞŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƉĞŽƉůĞĂŶĚŐŽŽĚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘dŚĞĐŚĂƉƚĞƌ ĚĞĨŝŶĞƐƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵĂŶĚ ŵĂdžŝŵŝnjĞĨƌĞĞĚŽŵŽĨǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŵŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘/ŶƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͕ƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂƵƐĞƐĂĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƐƵƐĞĚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚKƌĂŶŐĞŽƵŶƚLJ͘/ƚ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗^ŵĂƌƚ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͕DĂũŽƌ͕WƌŝŵĂƌLJ͕^ĞĐŽŶĚĂƌLJ͕ŽůůĞĐƚŽƌ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂĂůƐŽŚĂƐĂŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶƐ͘ 187
183Active Transportation Plan Appendices
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϰ
dŚĞŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ
ůĞŵĞŶƚůĂLJƐŽƵƚĂƐĞƌŝĞƐŽĨŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƚŚĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵǁŝƚŚŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͘ ^ŽŵĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚŐŽĂůƐĂŶĚƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗
'K>ZͲϯ–ŶĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵƚŚĂƚƵƚŝůŝnjĞƐƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƐLJƐƚĞŵŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĚĞŵĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ ƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJZͲϯ͘ϰ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞĞŵƉůŽLJĞƌƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚƌĂŶƐŝƚƐƵďƐŝĚŝĞƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞǁŽƌŬƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞƐ͕ ƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ƚĞůĞĐŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚǁŽƌŬͲĂƚͲŚŽŵĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ĞŵƉůŽLJĞĞĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶƚŝĂůƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĨŽƌ ĐĂƌƉŽŽůƐͬǀĂŶƉŽŽůƐ͘
• WŽůŝĐLJZͲϯ͘ϲ͗WƌŽŵŽƚĞƚŚĞƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŝŶŐůĞŽĐĐƵƉĂŶƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌŝƉƐ͕ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĚĞŵĂŶĚ ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƌŝĚĞƐŚĂƌŝŶŐ͕ƚĞůĞĐŽŵŵƵƚŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͘ • WŽůŝĐLJZͲϯ͘ϴ͗
ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞŶĞǁĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌŶŽŶ Ͳ ǀĞŚŝĐƵůĂƌŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘
zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ;ϮϬϭϰͿ
dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂWĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŝƐƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂǀŝƐŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͕ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌŝŶŐ ƚŚĞĞdžŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶŽĨĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚĚĞƐŝƌĞƐŽĨƚŚĞŝƚLJƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶŐƵŝ ĚĞƐ ĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶͲŵĂŬŝŶŐƌĞŐĂƌĚŝŶŐƉŽůŝĐLJĂŶĚĐŽŶƚĂŝŶƐĂŶŝŶǀĞŶƚŽƌLJĂŶĚĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĂŶĚƐĞƌǀŝĐĞŽĨĨĞƌŝŶŐƐ͕ ŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚĐĂƉŝƚĂůŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŽďĞŵĂĚĞŽǀĞƌƚŚĞŶĞdžƚƚǁĞŶƚLJLJĞĂƌƐƚŚĂƚǁŝůůĞŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞƋƵĂůŝƚLJŽĨ ůŝĨĞŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶĂůƐŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂŶĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚŽĨĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶŶĞĞĚƐĂŶĚŽƉƚŝŽŶƐĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐĨƵƚƵƌĞĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͘
dŚĞƉůĂŶůĂLJƐŽƵƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚƚƌĂŝůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͘^ŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƌĞůĞǀĂŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƚƌĂŝůƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ Ϯ͘ϱ͘ϮĞdƌĂŝů^ƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ–dŚĞŝƚLJŽĨzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨdƌĂŝůƐĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĞƐĂĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞĚƐLJƐƚĞŵŽĨƌŝĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŚŝŬŝŶŐ ƚƌĂŝůƐĂŶĚďŝŬĞǁĂLJƐ͘dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞƐƚŚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐĨŽƌƚŚĞǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƚLJƉĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŝůƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶzŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ͗
•
ĂƌƚŚĞŶDƵůƚŝƉƵƌƉŽƐĞdƌĂŝůƐͲ^ŽĨƚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƵƐĞďLJĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ŚŝŬĞƌƐ͕ũŽŐŐĞƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƐŽŵĞŵŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐǁŚĞƌĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞ͘
• WĂǀĞĚDƵůƚŝƉƵƌƉŽƐĞdƌĂŝůƐͲdƌĂŝůƐĨŽƌŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƵƐĞƌƐ;ŚŝŬĞƌƐ͕ũŽŐŐĞƌƐ͕ĞƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐͿƚŚĂƚĚŽŶŽƚŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌŝůLJ ŵĞĞƚůĂƐƐ/ŝŬĞǁĂLJƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐďĞĐĂƵƐĞŽĨǀĂƌLJŝŶŐǁŝĚƚŚƐĂŶĚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͘ • WĂǀĞĚdƌĂŝůƐ;ůĂƐƐ/ŝŬĞǁĂLJͿͲWĂǀĞĚƉĂƚŚƐŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůLJĨŽƌƵƐĞďLJďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ƚŚŽƐĞŝŶ ǁŚĞĞůĐŚĂŝƌƐĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚƐƚƌŽůůĞƌƐ͘
• ŝŬĞ>ĂŶĞƐ;ůĂƐƐ//ŝŬĞǁĂLJͿͲ^ƚƌŝƉĞĚ͕ƐƚĞŶĐŝůĞĚĂŶĚƐŝŐŶĞĚůĂŶĞƐŽŶƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨďŝĐLJĐůĞƐ͘ • ŝŬĞZŽƵƚĞƐ;ůĂƐƐ///ŝŬĞǁĂLJͿͲ^ŝŐŶĞĚƌŽƵƚĞƐĂůŽŶŐƐƚƌĞĞƚƐŽƌŚŝŐŚǁĂLJƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůĞƐƐŚĂƌĞƚƌĂǀĞůůĂŶĞƐǁŝƚŚŵŽƚŽƌ ǀĞŚŝĐůĞƐ͘
188
184Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
D
DKZEhD
ůƚĂWůĂŶŶŝŶŐнĞƐŝŐŶ͕/ŶĐ͘zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂͲWůĂĐĞŶƚŝĂDƵůƚŝͲŐĞŶĐLJĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϱ zŽƌďĂ>ŝŶĚĂ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶ͗ZŝĚŝŶŐ͕,ŝĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŝŬĞǁĂLJdƌĂŝůƐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚ;ϮϬϬϱͿ dŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞƚŽƚŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨdƌĂŝůƐǁŽƌŬƐƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂƉůĂŶƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞŶĞƚǁŽƌŬŽĨƚƌĂŝůƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚŽƵƚzŽƌďĂ >ŝŶĚĂ͘
ƋƵĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐ͕ũŽŐŐĞƌƐ͕ŚŝŬĞƌƐ͕ďŝĐLJĐůŝƐƚƐďŽƚŚŵŽƵŶƚĂŝŶĂŶĚƌŽĂĚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚŽƐĞǁŝƚŚƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚLJŶĞĞĚƐǁĞƌĞĂůů ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƚŚĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƚLJƉĞŽĨƚƌĂŝůƐĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƵƐĞƌ͘dŚĞƉůĂŶůĞĚƚŽƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ Ă͘ dŚĞŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůƐŚŽƵůĚĂƵƚŚŽƌŝnjĞƚŚĞŝƚLJDĂŶĂŐĞƌƚŽϭͿĞĨĨĞĐƚƵĂƚĞƚŚĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŵŝƐƐŝŶŐƚƌĂŝůůŝŶŬƐ͕ĂŶĚϮͿ ƚŽǁŽƌŬǁŝƚŚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJŽǁŶĞƌƐƚŽŵĂŬĞĂĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƉƌŽƉĞƌƚLJůŝŶĞƐƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞƚƌĂŝůǁŝĚƚŚƐ͕ĚĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐƵƉŽŶƚŚĞ ĐŝƌĐƵŵƐƚĂŶĐĞƐƉĞƌƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚƚƌĂŝůĞůĞŵĞŶƚ͘
ď͘ dŚĞŝƚLJƐŚŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚŝŶŐĂdƌĂŝůƐDĂŶĂŐĞƌƉŽƐŝƚŝŽŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐŝďůĞĨŽƌĞŶĨŽƌĐŝŶŐƚŚĞ dƌĂŝůƐDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞ'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶĂƐŝƚƌĞůĂƚĞƐ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚŝƐƚƌĂŝůƐƐƚƵĚLJ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŽƚŚĞƌ ĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕WĂƌŬƐĂŶĚZĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐdƌĂŝůƐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘dŚĞdƌĂŝůƐDĂŶĂŐĞƌǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽ act as the City’s public relations officer as it relates to trails.
Đ͘ dŚĞŝƚLJƐŚŽƵůĚĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂŵĂƌŬĞƚŝŶŐĐĂŵƉĂŝŐŶƚŚĂƚŝŶĨŽƌŵƐƚŚĞƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞǀĂůƵĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĂŝů ƐLJƐƚĞŵ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŚĞŵǁŝƚŚĂƵƐĞƌͲfriendly map that is printed or accessible via the City’s website.
189
185Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Appendix B: Suitability Analysis
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia 1 To: Cities of Yorba Linda, CA and Placentia, CA
From: Ryan Johnson; Alta Planning + Design
Date: 10/24/2023
Re: Land Use Suitability Analysis
Land Use Suitability Analysis
Background and Scope
Alta has identified potential areas where easements could be implemented to extend existing trails or create new trails utilizing proximity to common destinations and environmental variables included in the land use data. Alta will focus our field work on identifying potential locations for future local multipurpose trails (recreational biking or walking, hard surface or soft surface); or even future equestrian trails (earthen / soft surface).
Suitability Analysis
Data
Alta utilized the following GIS data in the suitability analysis to identify key corridors for active travel. • Existing & Proposed bike/ped facilities (SCAG)
• Land Use (SCAG) 2019 – updated to 2021
• Commercial Districts (Alta-generated, using Overture data and Parcel land use type), 2023 • Libraries (Alta)
• City Halls (Alta)
• Schools (CSCD)
• Open Space / Parks (SCAG)
Analysis
Alta created a suitability score based on both the distance of parcels from destinations such as commercial district area edges, libraries, schools, city halls, parks; proximity to disadvantaged communities; as well as environmental data available within the existing parcel dataset.
For this suitability score, lower values are better. The distance to different destinations was calculated and recorded in the data, then combined and ranked as percentiles. Parcels in the lowest percentile groups received fewer points to create a Distance Score.
Environmental data within the parcel dataset and the associated scores for each variable are shown in Table 1. Again, lower scores are better in this case. Total points for the environment were combined and ranked as percentiles. Parcels in the lowest percentile groups received fewer points to create an overall Environmental Score.
Next, distance from census tracts designated by the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) as disadvantaged communities was also included in the analysis. The distance to these communities for each parcel was calculated and recorded in the data, then combined and ranked as percentiles. Parcels in the lowest percentile groups received fewer points to create a Disadvantage Score.
190
186Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia 2 The distance, environmental and disadvantage scores were combined for a final Total Suitability Score. This score was then symbolized and overlayed with existing trails, proposed trails and layer of parcels symbolized by ownership. This allowed Alta planners to visually inspect and prioritize corridors that create logical paths to connect trail gaps.
Table 1. Scores for Parcels intersecting various environmental factors, SCAG 2021 data
VARIABLE DESCRIPTION POINTS
FIRE Parcel intersects CalFire Very High Hazard Local Responsibility Areas or State Responsibility Areas (November 2020 version) (CalFIRE)
0 FLOOD Parcel intersects with a FEMA 100 Year Flood Plain data from the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM), obtained from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in August 10, 2017
1 EQUAKE Parcel intersects with an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Geological Survey; 2018)
0 LIQUAFA Parcel intersects with a Liquefaction Susceptibility Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016) 3 LANDSLIDE Parcel intersects with a Landslide Hazard Zone (California Geological Survey; 2016) 2 CPAD Parcel intersects with a protected area from the California Protected Areas Database(CPAD) – www.calands.org (accessed April 2021)
0 WILDLIFE Parcel intersects with wildlife habitat (US Fish & Wildlife ServiceCritical Habitat, Southern California Missing Linkages, Natural Lands & Habitat Corridors from Connect SoCal, CEHC Essential Connectivity Areas,Critical Coastal Habitats) 3 CNDDB The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)includes the status and locations of rare plants and animals in California. Parcels that overlap locations of rare plants and animals in California from the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB)have a greater likelihood of encountering special status plants and animals on the property, potentially leading to further legal requirements to allow development (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). Data accessed in October 2020.
2 HCPRA Parcel intersects Natural Community & Habitat Conservation Plans Reserve Designs from the Western Riverside MHSCP, Coachella Valley MHSCP, and the Orange County Central Coastal NCCP/HCP, as accessed in October 2020
1 WETLAND Parcel intersects a wetland or deepwater habitat as defined by the US Fish & Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Version 2.
2 191
187Active Transportation Plan Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia 3 Results
Parcels across the cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia were scored for potential active travel corridors. This analysis assumes that the overall Destination Distance Score, Environment Score and Disadvantage Scores should be weighted equally.
Next Steps
These initial corridors can be used by the project team as potential areas to prioritize for fieldwork. Further discussion with the client about the nature of some of the publicly-owned parcels as well as which planned facilities are near term could indicate which specific corridors are examined in field review.
192
188Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA-PLACENTIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Phase I Outreach Summary Report
March 2024
The cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia have all engagement collateral s on file Appendix C: Public Outreach Summary
193
189Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 1
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Outreach Notification .......................................................................................................................... 6
2.1. Community Meeting Flyer .......................................................................................................... 6
2.2. Email Notification ........................................................................................................................ 6
2.3. Social Media ................................................................................................................................ 6
2.4. Technical Advisory Committee Communications Toolkit...................................................... 6
2.5. Project Webpage ......................................................................................................................... 6
2.6. Online Feedback Map ................................................................................................................ 7
3. Local Community Events ................................................................................................................... 8
3.1. Placentia Local Community Event............................................................................................ 8
3.2. Placentia Local Community Event Key Concerns ................................................................. 8
3.3. Yorba Linda Local Community Event ...................................................................................... 9
3.4. Yorba Linda Local Community Event Key Concerns ............................................................ 9
4. Virtual Community Meeting ............................................................................................................... 9
4.1. Format of Meeting ....................................................................................................................... 9
4.2. Attendees ..................................................................................................................................... 9
4.3. Comments .................................................................................................................................. 10
5. In-Person Community Meetings ..................................................................................................... 10
5.1. Format of Meetings ................................................................................................................... 10
5.2. Stations ....................................................................................................................................... 12
5.3. Community Meeting Attendees ............................................................................................... 12
5.4. Comments .................................................................................................................................. 13
6. Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................... 14
Tables
Table 1: Community Meetings Overview........................................................................................ 5 Table 2: Placentia Local Community Event Summary of Participation ......................................... 8 Table 3: Yorba Linda Local Community Event Summary of Participation ..................................... 9 Table 4: Virtual Community Meeting Attendees ............................................................................. 9 Table 5: Virtual Community Meeting Comment Themes ............................................................. 10 Table 6: In-Person Community Meeting Attendees ..................................................................... 12 194
190Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 2
Table 7: Community Meetings Comment Themes ....................................................................... 13
Figures
Figure 1: Project Area Map ............................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Public Outreach Methods and Feedback Themes ......................................................... 5 Figure 3: Online Feedback Map Screenshot .................................................................................. 7 Figure 4: Yorba Linda Community Meeting Room Layout ........................................................... 11 Figure 5: Placentia Community Meeting Room Layout ............................................................... 12
195
191Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 3
Executive Summary
The City of Yorba Linda, the City of Placentia, and the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (PLYUSD) are collaborating to develop a comprehensive Active Transportation Plan (ATP). The ATP will incorporate bicycle and pedestrian needed improvement s, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) and multi-use trail plans, including horse trails.
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia initiated the outreach process in October 2023 and hosted three community meetings in January 2024. The goal of outreach for the initial phase was to promote the community meetings and gather meaningful feedback on walking, biking, rolling and riding through the online map before it closed on January 31, 2024. The feedback collected will be used to develop recommendations to be included in the Draft ATP.
Outreach methods included the use of electronic methods such as e -blasts, Project websites, and social media posts. In addition, more traditional methods were conducted involving distributing community meeting flyers at key public destinations. Featured locations included local bike shops and the Cities’ public libraries.
Over the course of the initial outreach period, the Project received over 200 comments from stakeholders through the online map, online/paper feedback forms, and comments through outreach events. These comments came from stakeholders throughout Orange County, including individual stakeholders, residents, and community organizations.
The topics mentioned varied widely and ranged from city connectivity, trails in Placentia, crosswalks, pedestrian/student safety, improved sidewalks, improved bicycling infrastructure, and more.
The feedback generated will help provide guidance on the development of the Draft ATP. The Draft ATP is scheduled to be released in spring 2024 where the outreach will include a virtual community meeting and attending local community events to garner comments on the document to be included in the Final plan.
All engagement collaterals are on file with both cities. 196
192Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 4
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview
This bi-city ATP is needed to add and to connect infrastructure for safer, more accessible walking and biking for school children, families, residents, and visitors, as well as for improving the multi-use trail network for exercise and recreation.
Currently, neither city has an ATP or SRTS program. The ATP will result in recommended infrastructure/non-infrastructure projects and programs that reflect local and national engineering best practices, rigorous data analysis, and extensive stakeholder eng agement.
Additionally, the 6 Es of SRTS (Engagement, Equity, Encouragement, Education, Engineering, and Evaluation) will be focused on throughout the development of the ATP.
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia coordinated all public outreach activities with the project team, which consisted of PYLUSD, Caltrans, Alta Planning + Design, and MBI Media.
Figure 1: Project Area Map
The initial outreach period began in October 2023 and continued through January 31, 2024.
During the outreach period, the Project Team attended local community events and hosted three public community meetings (2 in-person and 1 virtual) in English, with Spanish interpretation available. Each meeting had a casual, open house format. The meetings consisted of a PowerPoint presentation, project boards detailing types of infrastructure the Project Team will investigate improving, and several ways for attendees to provide feedback. Feedback opportunities included feedback forms, an overview of the online input map during the virtual meeting, and both a physical and digital input map at the in-person meetings. 197
193Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 5
Community meetings were held on the following dates:
Table 1: Community Meetings Overview
Meeting Date Attendance Feedback Forms
Virtual
Via Zoom
Wednesday, January
11, 2024 8 attendees N/A
In-Person
Yorba Linda Public
Library
4852 Lakeview
Avenue, Yorba Linda
Wednesday, January
17, 2024 7 attendees 1
In-Person
Whitten Community
Center
900 S Melrose St,
Placentia
Thursday, January 18,
2024 2 attendees 0
Figure 2: Public Outreach Methods and Feedback Themes
198
194Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 6
2. Outreach Notification
Community members and stakeholders were notified about the Draft ATP and encouraged to submit feedback through various outlets such as email notification, social media, City newsletters, and flyers.
2.1. Community Meeting Flyer
The community meeting flyers promoted the Project, the upcoming community meetings, the project webpage, and how to submit feedback. Virtual community meeting flyers were distributed via social media posts and City email notifications. The flyers were utilized to directly notify the community and ensure these areas were informed of the project.
Physical flyers were also distributed to the following community locations:
• Fenix Cycling (Yorba Linda)
• Jax Bicycle Center (Yorba Linda)
• Placentia Library
• Whitten Community Center (Placentia)
2.2. Email Notification
Emails were distributed to the stakeholder email list to promote the start of the initial outreach period, community meetings, the online comment map, and encourage participation throughout. A total of 4 emails were distributed to the stakeholder list consisting of approximately 160 email addresses between Wednesday, November 29, 2023, and the closing of the outreach period on Wednesday, January 31, 2024.
2.3. Social Media
Social Media posts were published by the Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia to promote the Project, the in-person and virtual community meetings, and how to comment during the initial outreach period. The posts were developed by the outreach team and posted on the Cities’ social media accounts. Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter were utilized to launch regular feed posts. The posts included project information, meeting information , and a call to action to provide comments on the online map to be incorporated into the Draft ATP.
2.4. Technical Advisory Committee Communications Toolkit The project team conducted a total of two Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings prior to the online map closing on January 31, 2024. Invited stakeholders included PYLUSD, city residents and local active transportation enthusiasts, county agencies, members of cycling and equestrian organizations, and more.
In the first TAC Meeting, members requested a toolkit to promote the project to members of their organizations or other external stakeholders. The toolkit provided to the TAC members consisted of a project overview, graphics, newsletter text, and social media text to share.
2.5. Project Webpage
A project website was created and contains the following:
• Materials
a) Fact Sheet (English and Spanish)
b) Community Meeting Materials
199
195Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 7
i) Meeting Flyer (English and Spanish)
ii) Virtual Community Meeting Recording (English and Spanish) • Overview
• Goals
• Schedule
• Online Feedback Map
• Feedback form
• Community Meeting Details
• Contact information
2.6. Online Feedback Map
The online feedback map on the project webpage allowed participants to virtually click on specific locations on the project map that they would like to see improvements on.
Participants could add comments on the map for improvements to active transportation trails, bikeways, pathways, and more. Over 200 comments were received on the map (see screenshot below). General themes included:
• Make sidewalk & crossing improvements (e.g., curb ramps, crossing signals) • Close gaps in trail & bikeway networks
• Improve access to Chino Hills State Park, Carbon Canyon & surrounding cities • Better maintain existing active transportation facilities
Figure 3: Online Feedback Map Screenshot
200
196Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 8
3. Local Community Events
The project team conducted outreach at a community event in each respective city. The pop-up events allowed the project team to go directly to the public to seek input, engage the community, and inform about the project. The team shared the fact sheets in English and Spanish with booth visitors and had sign-in sheets to add to the project distribution database, presentation boards that provided information on bicycle and pedestrian facilities , and iPads were available with the online feedback map. Additionally, a physical version of the online feedback map with barrier and destination post-it notes were available as another means to collect data. Feedback forms were also used to encourage attendees to submit comments on the project.
3.1. Placentia Local Community Event
On Saturday, October 14, 2023, from 10am to 4pm the project team attended the Placentia Heritage Festival at the Tri-City Regional Park (2301 N. Kraemer Blvd., Placentia, CA 92870).
The Heritage Festival was a family-friendly event that features a car show, parade, live music, family-fun games, crafts, local vendors, etc.
Table 2: Placentia Local Community Event Summary of
Participation
Walks-ups
Barrier &
Destination Post-it
Notes
Sign-Ups Feedback Forms
50 (2 Spanish
speakers)
20 3 4 (written)
3.2. Placentia Local Community Event Key Concerns
Below is a list of common topics heard from the community:
• Happy this plan is taking place and promoting ATP
• Certain streets need traffic light improvement
• Unsafe walking, drivers do not stop for pedestrians
• Make crosswalks more visible
• Separate bike lanes and driving
• Many city streets are missing ramps on sidewalks
• Helpful for pedestrians and the drivers when crosswalks have a timer • Connectivity to other cities; Fullerton, Anaheim, and Brea 201
197Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 9
3.3. Yorba Linda Local Community Event
On Saturday, December 2, 2023, from 4pm to 9pm the project team attended the Holiday on Main Street (4905 Main St., Yorba Linda, CA 92886). The Holiday on Main Street was a family- friendly event that features local vendors, youth talent shows, holiday festivities, etc. The project team was positioned by the talent show stage and did not receive a lot of interest as the audience was focused on the performances.
Table 3: Yorba Linda Local Community Event Summary of
Participation
Walks-ups
Barrier &
Destination Post-it
Notes
Sign-Ups Feedback Forms
40 1 2 0
3.4. Yorba Linda Local Community Event Key Concerns
Below is a list of common topics heard from the community:
• Happy this plan is taking place and promoting ATP
• Maintaining the horse trails
• Making crosswalks more visible
• Add and separate bike lanes and driving
4. Virtual Community Meeting
4.1. Format of Meeting
The virtual meeting was held via Zoom on January 11, 2024, and consisted of a welcome, staff introductions, the project presentation, and concluded with an informal question and answer session. A Zoom Spanish interpretation channel was available as well.
4.2. Attendees
The following table provides a brief summary of the virtual meeting attendees:
Table 4: Virtual Community Meeting Attendees
Date & Time Event Attendees Organizations/ Community Groups Wednesday,
January 11,
2024
Virtual
Via Zoom
8 attendees
• Yorba Linda Traffic Commission
• Canyon Velo Cycling Club
• Cal State Fullerton
• Orange County Health Care
Agency
202
198Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 10
4.3. Comments
The table below is a summary of the comment’s key themes and concerns:
Table 5: Virtual Community Meeting Comment Themes
Date & Time Event Comment Themes
Wednesday,
January 11,
2024
Virtual
Via Zoom
• Accessibility to submit comments.
• Bike/pedestrian accident statistics.
• Data/statistics from fitness tracking apps.
• Existing planned improvements.
• Existing bike lanes and pedestrian features.
• Bike and car parking.
• Connections to other cities' bike lanes and
trails.
• PowerPoint presentation availability.
5. In-Person Community Meetings
5.1. Format of Meetings
As part of the project’s outreach process, two in-person community meetings were held, taking place in the each of the partnering Cities. The first in-person meeting was conducted at the Yorba Linda Public Library in Yorba Linda on January 17, 2024. The second in -person meeting was held at the Whitten Community Center in Placentia on January 18, 2024.
The in -person community meetings were held as an open house format that helped to solicit meaningful feedback and engagement with participants. The format allowed participants to attend at their leisure and created a more casual and inviting atmosphere. These workshops featured display boards, along with project staff strategically placed around the room at “stations” that featured specific topics. The project staff also facilitated conversations and answered questions.
A small introduction presentation was conducted at the beginning of each meeting and included a welcome, overview of the plan, purpose/goals, and an overview of outreach.
Participants were also encouraged to submit written comments through the feedback form as well as via project website.
The meeting was comprised of 7 project poster boards and fact sheets, and feedback forms were provided to attendees at the Welcome and Sign-In table at the entrance of the venue. 203
199Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 11
Yorba Linda Public Library – Community Room
Figure 4: Yorba Linda Community Meeting Room Layout
204
200Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 12
Whitten Community Center
5.2. Stations
• Sign-In/Welcome
o Feedback Form (English/Spanish)
o Fact Sheet (English/Spanish )
• Project Boards
o Project Overview
o Schedule
o Bicycle Facilities
o Pedestrian Facilities
o Equestrian Facilities
5.3. Community Meeting Attendees
The following table provides a brief summary of the in-person meeting attendees:
Table 6: In-Person Community Meeting Attendees
Date & Time Event Attendees Organizations/ Community Groups Wednesday,
January 17,
2024
In-Person
Yorba Linda
Public
Library
4852
Lakeview
Avenue,
Yorba
Linda
7 attendees
• Moms of Yorba Linda
• OC Sheriff Department
• Yorba Linda Traffic Commission
• Canyon Velo Cycling Club
• Yorba Linda Planning Commissioner
Figure 5: Placentia Community Meeting Room Layout
205
201Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 13
Date & Time Event Attendees Organizations/ Community Groups Thursday,
January 18,
2024
In-Person
Whitten
Community
Center
900 S
Melrose St,
Placentia
2 attendees
• No specific organization or community
group representation
5.4. Comments
The table below is a summary of the comment’s key themes and concerns:
Table 7: Community Meetings Comment Themes
Date & Time Event Comment Themes
Wednesday,
January 11,
2024
Virtual
Via Zoom
• Accessibility to submit comments.
• Bike/pedestrian accident statistics.
• Data/statistics from fitness tracking apps.
• Existing planned improvements.
• Existing bike lanes and pedestrian
features.
• Bike and car parking.
• Connections to other cities’ bike lanes and
trails.
• PowerPoint presentation availability.
Wednesday,
January 17,
2024
In-Person
Yorba Linda Public
Library
4852 Lakeview
Avenue, Yorba Linda
• Pedestrian safety.
• More crosswalks. Specifically, around
school areas.
• Uprooted trees on sidewalks.
• Add and separate bike lanes and driving.
• Signage indicating where bike lanes are.
Thursday,
January 18,
2024
In-Person
Whitten Community
Center
900 S Melrose St,
Placentia
• Signal/crosswalk timing.
• Grant/funding distribution.
• Active transportation trails in Placentia
(near Bastanchury Rd.).
• Trail amenities.
206
202Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase I Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan
March 2024 14
66.. Conclusion
Throughout the first outreach period, several key themes of potential improvement s were determined from stakeholder and community member feedback. The first opportunity is pedestrian safety – including updating existing sidewalks, adjusting signal/crosswalk timing, and adding more crosswalks in both cities, especially near PYLUSD schools. Another key theme garnered was the need for more connectivity between both Cities through bike lanes and active transportation trails. Community members also had various concerns and comments on bicycle transportation. Suggestions included investigating e-bike safety, increasing the amount of designated bike lanes, improving the safety of existing lanes, and adding more signage for cyclists to know where they are allowed to ride and navigate with more ea se. Finally, community members submitted suggestions on improving trails throughout the project area. These recommendations included adding more trail amenities and increasing the amount of active transportation trails, especially in Placentia near the highly-traveled Bastanchury Road.
The feedback from stakeholders collected throughout the initial outreach period will influence the Draft Active Transportation Plan. The Draft ATP is anticipated to be open for feedback in Spring 2024, accompanied by the secondary outreach period. Based on the participation from the online feedback map, comments were lacking in South Placentia and East Yorba Linda. Engagement efforts will be more focused in these areas for the next outreach period.
207
203Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA-PLACENTIA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Phase II Outreach Summary Report
November 2024
The cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia have all engagement collaterals on file 208
204Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 1
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 3
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Outreach Notification .......................................................................................................................... 5
2.1. Community Meeting Flyer .......................................................................................................... 5
2.2. Email Notification ........................................................................................................................ 5
2.3. Social Media ................................................................................................................................ 5
2.4. Technical Advisory Committee Communications Toolkit...................................................... 5
2.5. Project Webpage ......................................................................................................................... 6
2.6. Virtual Meeting Room ................................................................................................................. 6
3. Local Community Events ................................................................................................................... 9
3.1. Yorba Days Event ....................................................................................................................... 9
3.2. Yorba Linda Community Center Pop-up Event .................................................................... 10
3.3. Placentia Old Town Live Event ............................................................................................... 10
3.4. Placentia Heritage Festival Event .......................................................................................... 11
3.5. Yorba Linda Library Pop-up Event ......................................................................................... 12
3.6. Placentia Library Pop-up Event .............................................................................................. 12
4. Virtual Community Meeting ............................................................................................................. 13
4.1. Format of Meeting ..................................................................................................................... 13
4.2. Attendees ................................................................................................................................... 13
4.3. Comments .................................................................................................................................. 13
5. Stakeholder Presentations .............................................................................................................. 14
6. Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................... 17
Tables
Table 1: Virtual Meeting Room Stations and Boards (English/Spanish) ....................................... 7 Table 2: Yorba Days Event Summary of Participation ................................................................... 9 Table 3: Yorba Linda Community Center Pop-up Event Summary of Participation .................... 10 Table 4: Placentia Old Town Live Event Summary of Participation ............................................ 10 Table 5: Placentia Heritage Festival Event Summary of Participation ........................................ 11 Table 6: Yorba Linda Library Pop-up Event Summary of Participation ....................................... 12 Table 7: Placentia Library Pop-up Event Summary of Participation ............................................ 13 Table 8: Virtual Community Meeting Attendees ........................................................................... 13 Table 9: Additional Stakeholder Presentation Overview .............................................................. 15 209
205Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 2
Figures
Figure 1: Project Area Map ............................................................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Virtual Meeting Room Screenshot .................................................................................. 7
210
206Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 3
Executive Summary
The City of Yorba Linda, the City of Placentia, and the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (PLYUSD) are collaborating to develop a comprehensive Active Transportation Plan (ATP). The ATP will incorporate bicycle and pedestrian needed improvements, Safe Routes to School (SRTS) and multi-use trail plans, including horse trails.
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia initiated Phase I of the outreach process in October 2023 and hosted three community meetings in January 2024 . Phase II of the outreach process was focused between October 7, 2024, and November 4, 2024. The goal of outreach for Phase II was to promote the virtual community meeting and gather more specific feedback on the bi-city Draft ATP, highlighted recommendations, and Yorba Linda’s Updated Riding, Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Component.
Outreach strategies included the use of electronic methods such as e-blasts, project websites, and social media posts. In addition, more traditional methods included stakeholder group presentations, pop-up events at local events or establishments, and distributing community meeting flyers at key public destinations. Featured locations included for flyer distribution were local bike shops and the Cities’ public libraries.
Over the course of the Phase II public comment outreach period, the project received approximately 115 comments from stakeholders through the website/Virtual Meeting Room feedback forms, online/paper feedback forms, direct emails to the project team, verbal comments through outreach events, and comments during stakeholder and City Commission meetings. 30 comments were submitted via the project feedback form. These comments came from stakeholders throughout Orange County, including individual stakeholders, residents, and community organizations. The topics mentioned varied widely and ranged from pedestrian/student safety, crosswalks, improve sidewalks, improve bicycling infrastructure, increase accessibility and more.
The feedback generated on the Draft ATP will be reviewed and incorporated to help complete the Final ATP. The Final ATP will be presented to Yorba Linda City Councils in Winter 2024 and 2025 for approval.
All engagement collaterals are on file with both cities. 211
207Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 4
1. Introduction
1.1. Overview
This bi-city ATP is needed to add and to connect infrastructure for safer, more accessible walking and biking for school children, families, residents, and visitors, as well as for improving the multi-use trail network for exercise and recreation.
Currently, neither city has an ATP or SRTS program. The ATP will result in recommended infrastructure/non-infrastructure projects and programs that reflect local and national engineering best practices, rigorous data analysis, and extensive stakeholder eng agement.
Additionally, the six Es of SRTS (Engagement, Equity, Encouragement, Education, Engineering, and Evaluation) were focused on throughout the development of the ATP.
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia coordinated all public outreach activities with the project team, which consisted of PYLUSD, Caltrans, Alta Planning + Design, and MBI Media.
Figure 1: Project Area Map
The public comment outreach period began on October 7, 2024, and continued through November 4, 2024. During the outreach period, the project team attended local community events, presented at local organizations’ meetings, and hosted one virtual public community meeting in English, with Spanish interpretation available. Feedback opportunities included online/digital feedback forms as well as written feedback forms and verbal comments at events and meetings.
212
208Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 5
2. Outreach Notification
Community members and stakeholders were notified about the Draft ATP and encouraged to submit feedback through various outlets such as email notification, social media, City newsletters, and flyers.
2.1. Community Meeting Flyer
The community meeting flyers promoted the project, the upcoming community meeting, the project webpage, and how to submit feedback. Virtual community meeting flyers were distributed digitally via social media posts and City newsletters. The flyers were utilized to directly notify the community and ensure these areas were informed of the project.
Physical flyers were also distributed to the following community locations:
• Fenix Cycling (Yorba Linda)
• Jax Bicycle Center (Yorba Linda)
• Placentia Library (Placentia)
• Whitten Community Center (Placentia)
2.2. Email Notification
Emails were distributed to the stakeholder email list to promote review of the Draft ATP, public comment period, community meeting, the virtual meeting room (VMR), and encourage participation throughout. A total of five emails were distributed to the stakeholder list consisting of approximately 160 email addresses between Wednesday, October 9, 2024, and near the closing of the comment period on Friday, November 1, 2024.
2.3. Social Media
Social Media posts were published by the Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia to promote the project, the virtual community meeting, and how to comment on the Draft ATP. The posts were developed by the outreach team and posted on the Cities’ social media accounts. Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly known as Twitter) were utilized to la unch regular feed posts. The posts included project information, community meeting information, and a call to action to provide comments on the Draft ATP to be incorporated into the Final ATP.
Additional posts were circulated within other platforms to advertise the virtual community meeting and public comment period for the Draft ATP. These supplementary posts were included in the Yorba Linda Buzz Facebook Group, the Placentia Buzz Facebook Group, and the NextDoor app.
2.4. Technical Advisory Committee Communications Toolkit The project team conducted one Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meeting during the Draft ATP public comment period. Invited stakeholders included PYLUSD, city residents and local active transportation enthusiasts, county agencies, members of cycling and equestrian organizations, and more.
Members were provided a toolkit to promote the project, comment period, and community meeting to members of their organizations or other external stakeholders.
The toolkit provided to the TAC members consisted of a project overview, graphics, newsletter text, and social media text to share.
213
209Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 6
2.5. Project Webpage
A project website was updated for Phase II and included the following:
• Materials
a) Draft Active Transportation Plan
b) Updated Riding, Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Component c) Fact Sheet (English and Spanish)
d) Community Meeting Materials
i) Meeting Flyer (English and Spanish)
ii) Phase I Virtual Community Meeting Presentation and Recording (English and Spanish)
iii) Phase II Virtual Community Meeting Presentation and Recording (English and Spanish)
• Overview
• Goals
• Schedule
• Feedback form
• Community Meeting Details
• Contact information
2.6. Virtual Meeting Room
The project’s virtual meeting room (VMR) was added to the project website as an interactive hub during the Draft ATP comment period for the community to learn about the project with 24/7 access to project information and comment form. The VMR was launched starting Monday, October 7, 2024, through Monday, November 4 , 2024. The VMR was promoted via the meeting invitation flyer, project fact sheet, social media posts, email outreach, the TAC toolkit, and virtual community meeting. The VMR offered visitors the opportunity to learn about the project, highlighted recommendations, the Draft ATP and Updated Riding, Hiking, and Bikeway Trails Component, and the commenting period. Visitors were able to sign up for the project database, download project materials including the Draft ATP, and review recommendation maps. The VMR served as an extension to outreach efforts, allowing the public and stakeholders to visit the site at their convenience to take a virtual walk through the VMR’s stations, view the virtual boards, and submit comments.
The English and Spanish recording of the virtual community meeting, held on Tuesday, October 22, 2024, was added to the VMR to provide access to the meeting and project team presentation for anyone unable to attend the meeting. Approximately 1,300 unique/new users accessed the website landing page/VMR with a total of 22,000 page views during Phase II outreach.
Figure 2 below illustrates the VMR main room with the stations and multiple boards for viewing. 214
210Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 7
Figure 2: Virtual Meeting Room Screenshot
The virtual boards were assigned to VMR stations to reflect specific topics covered in the Draft ATP and highlighted recommendations.
Table 1: Virtual Meeting Room Stations and Boards (English/Spanish) VMR Station Assigned Virtual Boards
Station 1: Project Overview 1. Project Overview
2. Schedule
3. Draft ATP Overview/Goals
Station 2: Bicycle Facility Recommendations
1. Bicycle Facility Toolkit
2. Yorba Linda Bicycle Facility
Recommendations
3. Placentia Bicycle Facility
Recommendations
Station 3: Pedestrian Facility
Recommendations
1. Pedestrian Facility Toolkit
2. Yorba Linda Pedestrian Facility
Recommendations
3. Placentia Pedestrian Facility
Recommendations
Center of the Room 1. Feedback Form
2. Materials
a) Draft Active Transportation Plan
PDF
b) Updated Riding, Hiking, and
Bikeway Trails Component PDF
c) Fact Sheet (English and Spanish)
d) Community Meeting Materials
215
211Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 8
VMR Station Assigned Virtual Boards
i) Meeting Flyer (English and
Spanish)
ii) Virtual Community Meeting
Presentation
Station 4: Equestrian Considerations 1. Equestrian Considerations
2. 2024 Yorba Linda Riding, Hiking, and
Bikeway Trails Component
Station 5: Safe Routes to School 1. Safe Routes to School Audits Completed
2. Yorba Linda SRTS Map
Recommendations
3. Placentia SRTS Map Recommendations
Back Wall Video 1. Recording of Virtual Community Meeting (English/Spanish)
2.6.1. Website/VMR Virtual Comment Cards
A total of eight comments were submitted through the website/VMR feedback forms. These comments were received from local residents and agencies.
Key topics mentioned collected through the virtual feedback forms are listed below. • Draft ATP language and map clarifications for Final ATP (Caltrans District 12) • Placentia streets mentioned in Draft ATP are Tier 2 locations in Caltrans District 12’s CAT Plan
• ADA curb ramp recommendations
• Prioritization of bike lane gaps
• Consideration of active transportation near local collage Cal State Fullerton • Support for Draft ATP SRTS recommendations
• Overall project support
• Additional SRTS recommendations for El Dorado High School and Rose Drive Elementary School
• Prioritization of SRTS recommendations
216
212Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 9
3. Local Community Events
The project team conducted outreach at several community events in each respective city. The pop-up events allowed the project team to go directly to the public to seek input, engage the community, and inform about the project. The team shared fact sheets in English and Spanish with booth visitors and had sign-in sheets to add to the project distribution database, virtual community meeting flyers, and iPads were available with the VMR. Additionally, a physical booklet was available to stimulate specific feedback, including project overview information and highlighted recommendations and maps for each topic the Draft ATP addresses . Feedback forms were also used to encourage attendees to submit comments on the Draft ATP.
3.1. Yorba Days Event
On Saturday, May 4, 2024, from 10am to 2pm the project
team attended the Yorba Days event in Old Town Yorba
Linda (4905 Main St, Yorba Linda, CA 92886). The Yorba
Days event was a family-friendly event that featured a car show, parade, live music, crafts, local vendors, etc. After the closeout of the online feedback map in Phase I, the project team provided a physical map for attendees to
submit any remaining barrier and destination Post-It notes.
Flyers advertising the upcoming release of the Draft ATP were also distributed.
Table 2: Yorba Days Event Summary of Participation
Walks-ups Feedback
Forms
Barrier and
Destination
Post-it Notes
Key Comments/Themes
46 2 18
• Walking is great in Yorba Linda
• During COVID, walked every street
in Yorba Linda
• The cement barriers for the bike
paths in streets is confusing when
driving
• Need to make it safer for horse
riding
• Develop more bike paths away
from cars
• Like the improvements done on
the Santa Ana River Trail
• Lakeview Street is very unsafe for
horses
• Develop a horse crossing bridge
• Appreciate the bike paths around
the city
217
213Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 10
3.2. Yorba Linda Community Center Pop-up Event
On Tuesday, October 8, 2024, from 9am to 1pm the project team held a pop-up at the Yorba Linda Community Center. This date and timeframe were chosen to target one of the Community Center’s busiest times, when seniors and class attendees frequent. The project team interacted with seniors, families, and community members attending classes at the Community Center.
Table 3: Yorba Linda Community Center Pop-up Event Summary of Participation Walk-ups Feedback
Forms
Fact Sheets/
Flyers Distributed Key Comments/Themes
40 0 30
• More trail safety
• Not enough lighting on the
trails/walkways
• Plants need to be trimmed to
avoid people hiding in them
• Bring old electric cable cars back
• Safety hazard of Yorba Linda +
Fairmont turn signal changing quickly
• More transportation from Anaheim
Hills to Yorba Linda
3.3. Placentia Old Town Live Event
On Thursday, October 10, 2024, from 6pm to 8pm the project team attended the Placentia Old Town Live Concert Series (100 Block of Santa Fe Avenue, Placentia). The Placentia Old Town Live Event was a concert-focused event that featured local vendors. The project team was positioned by the show stage and did not receive a lot of interest as the audience was focused on the performances.
Table 4: Placentia Old Town Live Event Summary of Participation Walk-ups Feedback
Forms
Fact Sheets/
Flyers Distributed Key Comments/Themes
3 0 3
• Attendees were happy that the Cities
are trying to make these
improvements
• Sidewalks in Placentia need to have
more ramps for accessibility
218
214Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 11
3.4. Placentia Heritage Festival Event
On Saturday, October 19, 2024, from 9am to 4pm the project team attended the Placentia Heritage Festival at the Tri-City Regional Park (2301 N. Kraemer Blvd., Placentia, CA 92870).
The Heritage Festival was a family-friendly event that features a parade, live music, family-fun games, crafts, local vendors, etc.
Table 5: Placentia Heritage Festival Event Summary of Participation Walk-ups Feedback
Forms
Fact Sheets/
Flyers Distributed Key Comments/Themes
60 1 60
• Appreciation for attendance at
community events and Spanish
project materials
• Community felt safe during the day on
all trails/ walkways currently
available
• SRTS:
• Safe routes to schools should
be a priority for this project
• Lack of safe sidewalk at
Bradford/Placentia on median
by Valencia High School
• El Dorado High School needs
pedestrian access near
Holmes Ave/Valencia Ave
• Bernardo Yorba Middle School
walkway improvement
• Lack of safety on the
sidewalks for students
currently in this area
• Connectivity:
• OC Loop connectivity
• Connect N/S route at
Palm/Carbon Creek down to
Santa Ana River Trail
• Accessibility:
• All walkways and paths should
be accessible for the visually
impaired
219
215Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 12
Walk-ups Feedback
Forms
Fact Sheets/
Flyers Distributed Key Comments/Themes
• Need wheelchair accessible
curb cuts
• Frustration with lack of bike/car lane
separation
• Additional lighting/police at night
• Do not pinch bike lanes at
intersections
• E-bike speed regulation
3.5. Yorba Linda Library Pop-up Event
On Monday, October 21, 2024, from 2:15pm to 7:15pm the project team held a pop-up at the Yorba Linda Library/Cultural Arts Center (4852 Lakeview Ave, Yorba Linda, CA 92886). This date and timeframe were chosen to target one of the Library’s busiest times, when class attendees and students visit most. The project team interacted with students, families, and community members attending classes or visiting the library.
Table 6: Yorba Linda Library Pop-up Event Summary of Participation Walk-ups Feedback
Forms
Fact Sheets/
Flyers Distributed Key Comments/Themes
30 0 30
• Families are impressed that Yorba
Linda is taking initiative to create Safe
Routes to School
• Yorba Linda does not have much
transportation for seniors
• Students want accessible walkways to
school
• Concerns about safety for children
should be a priority
• Gratitude for the project
3.6. Placentia Library Pop-up Event
On Friday, October 25, 2024, from 9am to 1pm the project team held a pop-up at the Placentia Library (411 E Chapman Ave, Placenta, CA 92870). This date and timeframe were chosen to target one of the Library’s busiest times, when class attendees and students visit most. The project team interacted with library class attendees, students, and community members. 220
216Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 13
Table 7: Placentia Library Pop-up Event Summary of Participation Walk-ups Feedback
Forms
Fact Sheets/
Flyers Distributed Key Comments/Themes
20 0 20
• Issues with cars and pedestrian
walkways at Tuffree Street
Intersection
• Safety of walkways should be a
priority for children
• Support for a trail to Bastanchury
Street
• Equestrian considerations are just as
important to accommodate as
pedestrian and bicycle
considerations
4. Virtual Community Meeting
4.1. Format of Meeting
The virtual meeting was held via Zoom on October 22, 2024, and consisted of a welcome, staff introductions, and a project presentation. The presentation included a project overview, goals, outreach overview, Draft ATP overview, and instructions on how to submit comments. The meeting concluded with an informal question and answer session , where attendees could submit questions verbally, through the Zoom chat box, and the Zoom Q&A function . A Zoom Spanish interpretation channel was available as well.
4.2. Attendees
The following table provides a brief summary of the virtual meeting attendees:
Table 8: Virtual Community Meeting Attendees
Date & Time Location Registrants Attendees Organizations/ Community Groups
Tuesday,
October 22,
2024
Virtual
Via Zoom 19 13
attendees
• Orange County Sherriff
• Placentia-Yorba Linda
Unified School District
• Wagner Elementary School
• Canyon Velo Cycling Club
4.3. Comments
The list below is a summary of the comment’s key themes and concerns:
• Public comment effect on Final ATP
• Accessibility to read/zoom in on Draft ATP and maps
• Project timeline/implementation
221
217Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 14
• Side of bikeways lack signal buttons
• Support for proposed recommendations
• Adding the meeting PowerPoint to project website/VMR
5. Stakeholder Presentations
Supplemental presentations at stakeholder meetings were coordinated with key community organizations and stakeholder groups within the project area. The purpose of the presentations was to educate and garner feedback from interested groups related to active transportation in the community. The project team attended established organization meetings in person or initiated individual meetings virtually. More details on each presentation and the feedback received are documented in their respective meeting quick reports.
The following table provides a brief summary of the stakeholder presentations:
222
218Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 15
Table 9: Additional Stakeholder Presentation Overview
Organization Presentation Topics Date &
Time Location Attendees Comment Themes
Placentia-
Yorba Linda
Unified
School
District PTA
Council
• Project overview
and goals
• Phase I SRTS
survey results
• Overview of the
SRTS walk audits
• Phase I key
comment themes
• Project outreach
• Information on the
upcoming release
of the Draft ATP
• Project resources
• Q&A
Wednesday,
June 5,
2024
In-Person:
Yorba Linda Unified
School District Building
1301 E Orangethorpe
Ave, Placentia, CA
92870
Approximately
25 attendees
• 500 new students added to the District
this year
• Resend SRTS survey for more feedback
• Lighting needed on El Cajon Trail
(specifically between Eureka Ave & Casa
Loma Ave)
• Add driveways to school entrances for
safer pick up/drop off
• The group likes having “Right Turn Only”
signs at driveways
• They would like more dedicated left-turn
signals into school driveways
• Concerns about the safety of Crossing
Guards
• Coordinate with Walk to School Day in
October
• Schools outside of Placentia/Yorba Linda
but within the district not being studied
(Anaheim, Fullerton, etc.)
• Additional groups to present to/events to
have pop-up booth
• E-bike safety
• Possible pop-up events: Yorba Linda 4th
of July celebration, Movies in the Park
Yorba Linda
Sunrise
Rotary Club
• Project overview
and goals
• Draft ATP overview
• How to comment
on Draft ATP
• Outreach overview
• VMR walkthrough
Friday,
October 18,
2024
In-Person:
Black Gold Golf Course
1 Black Gold Dr, Yorba
Linda, CA 92886
Approximately
30-40
attendees
• Pedestrian and bike trail improvements
are needed.
• Is this project similar to or coordinating
with OC Loop?
• Does this project involve vehicle lane
reduction?
• Need to be able to cross at
Bastanchury/Rose
223
219Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 16
Organization Presentation Topics Date &
Time Location Attendees Comment Themes
• Project resources
• Q&A
• More connectivity to Canyon Creek Trail,
possibly with OC Loop
• Are equestrian trail fencing improvements
possible? Or is this not viable due to City
Right of Way?
• Will this Plan address e-bike safety
enforcement, especially on trails?
Yorba Linda
Country
Riders
• Project overview
and goals
• Yorba Linda bicycle
recommendations
• Riding, Hiking, and
Bikeway Trails
Component
overview
• Yorba Linda
equestrian and trail
recommendation
• How to comment
on Draft ATP
• Project resources
• Q&A
Wednesday,
October 30,
2024
Virtual, Zoom 2 attendees
• Utility relocation will need to be done for
Bastanchury
• Strong urge for updates for Ohio route,
may have ROW issues in some locations
• Private easements related to equestrian
trail improvement cannot be included in
Plan
• Project team will send direct link to Draft
ATP for members to review, members
may email comments directly.
224
220Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
Phase II Outreach Summary Report Yorba Linda-Placentia Active Transportation Plan November 2024 17
6. Conclusion
The community feedback garnered in the second outreach period highlights several key opportunities to consider when developing the Final Active Transportation Plan. From both cities, there is a strong demand for enhanced safety measures, including better lighting on trails and walkways, improving crosswalks and bike lanes, increasing e-bike enforcement, and safer traffic management around schools and high-traffic areas. Accessibility needs to be prioritized, with specific requests for more ADA-compliant curb ramps, wheelchair-accessible paths, and facilities for the visually impaired. Additionally, there is a clear desire for better separation between bike lanes and vehicle traffic, as well as more connectivity between local bike lanes. City of Yorba Linda locals requested more equestrian-friendly infrastructure, such as horse crossing bridges and improve trail fencing. Community members also emphasized the need to improve connectivity between local trails and regional networks and create safer school perimeters/drop-off zones, especially for schools in the City of Placentia . Overall the community provided positive feedback and expressed appreciation for the development of this plan and future improvements.
The more specific stakeholder feedback collected throughout the Phase II outreach period will be incorporated and aid in finalizing the Active Transportation Plan. Once complete, the project team will present the Final ATP to the Yorba Linda and Placentia City Councils for approval and adoption.
225
221Active Transportation Plan Appendices
Appendix D: Safety Analysis
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 1
To: City of Yorba Linda; City of Placentia
From: Alta Planning + Design
Date: 9/27/2023
Re: Yorba Linda-Placentia ATP: Collision Analysis Draft Introduction
This memo provides a collision analysis for the Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia, California, overviewing crashes occurring from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022. This analysis focuses on active transportation collisions resulting in a fatality or serious injury while walking and biking in Yorba Linda and Placentia. Additionally, the analysis examines crashes in the La Jolla and Old Town equity-focus areas in Placentia.
The analysis shows that bicycle and pedestrian crashes are more often severe (i.e., fatalities or serious injuries) in Placentia than in other areas. Crashes are also concentrated on state routes and within equity-focus areas of Placentia. The analysis summarizes collision profile and identifies the type, frequency, and location of crashes that occurred. This analysis would support the future identification of recommendations to improve safety.
Method
Collision data was obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), which pulls data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS), a California State database that contains information on crash attributes and locations. TIMS provides datasets of crash, party, and victim table, which includes the specific information of each collision, such as case number, county, route, location, type of crash, year of crash, time of collision, total ft, total injured, light conditions, and weather conditions. The vehicle crash data was obtained to compare the differences and trends between bicycle and pedestrian crashes with vehicle crashes. Collision data occurring on freeways were excluded in this analysis, while those on ramps connecting to local or state roads were included.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Crash History
The Cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia experienced a total of 1,607 crashes from 2013 to 2022. One hundred twenty-three crashes happened while biking and 135 crashes happened while walking. Bicycle- and pedestrian-involved accidents account for 16 percent of all collisions.
Collisions in Yorba Linda and Placentia cluster along Yorba Linda Boulevard, which is an east-west street which crosses both Placentia and Yorba Linda, as well as Rose Drive, a north-south street, crossing both Placentia and Yorba Linda as well.
Notably, there are more and denser collisions towards the west of the study area, particularly in Placentia (see Figure 1 and Figure 3).
226
222Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 2
Figure 1. Active Transportation Crashes by Severity
A significant portion of these crashes occur at the western boundary, in the La Jolla and Old Town equity-focus areas of Placentia. Spatially, this analysis reveals that bicycle collisions occurred more often in Placentia and that these incidents were often more severe in nature.
•It is important to note that no reported bike crashes were fatal in Yorba Linda and Placentia over the period. •Five percent of bicycle or pedestrian crashes are fatal, while only one percent of vehicle crashes are fatal. Notably, nine percent of all pedestrian crashes are fatal.
•Ten percent of bicycle and pedestrian crashes are severe-injury crashes, while only four percent of vehicle crashes are severe-injury crashes. Among all crashes, only five percent are severe-injury crashes, which shows that bicycle and pedestrian severe-injury crashes occur twice as often as all types of crashes. •Active transportation-related crashes, especially for pedestrians, are more likely to be fatal and severe than other crashes.
•Nearly all crashes (89%) involving bicycles and pedestrians occurred in clear weather conditions, therefore weather does not seem to be a major safety factor in Yorba Linda and Placentia. 227
223Active Transportation Plan Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 3
0%
9%5%1%2%
10%10%10%4%5%
90%
81%85%
95%93%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Bicycle
Crashes
Pedestrian
Crashes
Bicycle or
Pedestrain
Crashes
Vehicle
Crashes
All Crashes
Fatality Severe Injury Visible Injury or Complaint
Figure 2. Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes are more likely to be severe than other types of crashes 228
224Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 4
Figure 3. Clustered Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes by severity 229
225Active Transportation Plan Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 5
•Bicycle crashes most often occur on weekdays, whereas pedestrian crashes most often occur on Fridays and weekends in Yorba Linda and Placentia.
•Bicycle crashes most often occur on Monday (18%), Wednesday (18%), and Friday (18%). Among all, severe-injury crashes occur more often on Wednesdays.
•Pedestrian crashes occur most often on Fridays (20%) and Saturdays (17%). Fatal crashes mainly happened on Saturday, with 4% of all.
Figure 4. Bicycle Crashes by Day of the Week
Figure 5. Pedestrian Crashes by Day of the Week
2%0%3%2%0%2%0%
16%
11%
15%
15%18%11%
4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Mon
Bicycle Crashes by Day of the Week
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
Sun
Fatality
Severe Injury
Visible Injury or Complaint
1%0%1%1%1%4%
1%
1%1%1%1%1%
1%
2%
7%13%14%11%
18%12%
6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
Pedestrian Crashes by Day of the Week
Mon
Tue
Fatality Severe Injury Visible Injury or Complaint
230
226Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 6
•Bicycle crashes have a decreasing trend among all kinds of injuries, from 28 fatal or injury crashes in 2013 to 5 injury crashes in 2022, with no fatal or severe-injury crashes reported. •Pedestrian crashes show an increasing trend of crashes from 2019 to 2022. •There were fewer fatal or severe-injury crashes in 2019 than other years for both bicycle and pedestrian crashes.
Figure 6. Bicycle Crashes by Severity by Year
Figure 7. Pedestrian Crashes by Severity by Year
3 1 2 0 1 1 2 2 0
14 13 12 12 11
1 1 5 4 4
11 5
1 4 4
1 4 3
1 0
5 10
15 20
25 30
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Bicycle Crashes by Severity by Year
Fatal Injury (Severe)Injury (Other Visible)Injury (Complaint of Pain) 1 2 5 1 1 1 1
4 2
1 0
0 3 2 1 1
8 2
14 9
6 3
2 4
9 12
3 4
5 7
7 4
1 2
4 3
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Pedestrian Crashes by Severity by Year
Fatal Injury (Severe)Injury (Other Visible)Injury (Complaint of Pain) 231
227Active Transportation Plan Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 7
•In Yorba Linda and Placentia, eleven percent of pedestrian fatal or severe-injury crashes occurred when it was dark and street lights were available. Only six percent of pedestrian fatal or severe-injury crashes occurred in daylight conditions.
Figure 8. Bicycle Crashes by Light Conditions
Figure 9. Pedestrian Crashes by Light Conditions
•In Yorba Linda and Placentia, fatal or severe-injury crashes for pedestrians most often happened when pedestrians were crossing outside of a crosswalk (7%). Overall, 45 percent of all severity-types of pedestrian collisions occured while the pedestrian was crossing the street at an intersection with a crosswalk. 3%
2%
5%
70%
3%
17%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
Daylight (A)
Dusk - Dawn (B)
Dark - Street Lights (C)
Bicycle Crashes by Light Conditions
Fatality
Severe Injury
Visible Injury or Complaint
2%
1%
5%
1%
4%
7%
53%
3%
24%
1%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%
Daylight (A)
Dusk - Dawn (B)
Dark - Street Lights (C)
Dark - Street Lights Not Functioning (E)
Pedestrian Crashes by Light Conditions
Fatality
Severe Injury Visible Injury or Complaint
232
228Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 8
Figure 10. Pedestrian Crashes by Pedestrian Action
•Over 30 percent of all bicycle crashes happened in the La Jolla and Old Town equity-focus areas in Placentia (See Figure 11). Four (4) bicycle Killed or Severe-Injury (KSI) crashes (3%) occurred in equity areas, while eight crashes (7%) were reported outside of the areas.
•A total of 26 percent of all pedestrian crashes occurred in equity areas in Placentia (See Figure 12 and Figure 13). •Most bicycle crashes occurred along Chapman Avenue in Old Town and Orangethorpe Avenue in the La Jolla neighborhood. There is an existing Class II bike lane along East Chapman Avenue between Central Ave and Orangethorpe Ave, as well as indicates of newly striped bike lanes being implemented along Orangethorpe Avenue. This roadway is currently six lanes wide, with a center turn lane or median as well. •Most pedestrian crashes occur along Chapman Avenue in Old Town and West La Jolla Street in the La Jolla neighborhood. The La Jolla neighborhood is bisected by State Route 57 (“Orange Freeway”). West La Jolla Street connects the neighborhood with a two-lane bridge over the freeway, with well-used sidewalks. 3%
4%
2%
2%
1%
3%
2%
2%
40%
4%
20%
10%
7%
0%10%20%30%40%50%
Crossing in Crosswalk at Intersection
(B)
Crossing in Crosswalk Not at
Intersection (C)
Crossing Not in Crosswalk (D)
In Road, Including Shoulder (E)
Not in Road (F)
Pedestrian Crashes by Pedestrian Action
Fatality
Severe Injury
Visible Injury or Complaint
233
229Active Transportation Plan Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 9
Figure 11. Active Transportation Collisions & Equity
3%
28%
3%
23%
7%
63%
18%
56%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
% KSI % non-KSI % KSI % non-KSI
Bicycle Crashes Pedestrian Crashes
Active Transportation Collisions & Equity
in Equity Area in Non-Equity Area
234
230Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 10
Figure 12. Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes and Equity-Focus Areas 235
231Active Transportation Plan Appendices
MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. 11
Figure 13. Detail map of Bicycle and Pedestrian Crashes in Placentia 236
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia232
Appendix E: Recommendations List
Street From Street To Street Class Mileage City
Alta Vista Kraemer E City Limit IIB 1.8 Placentia
Angelina Neighborhood Greenway Kraemer Bradford IIIB 1.0 Placentia Bastanchury W City Limit E City Limit IIB 1.9 Placentia Bradford N City Limit Santa Fe IIIB 1.0 Placentia
Carbon Canyon N City Limit Parque Del Arroyo Verde I 2.0 Placentia Central Alta Vista Chapman IIB 0.4 Placentia
Chapman W City Limit Kraemer II 1.0 Placentia
Chapman Kraemer Orangethorpe IV 0.9 Placentia
Kraemer Bastanchury Chapman IV 1.8 Placentia
Kraemer N City LImit Bastanchury IV 0.6 Placentia
La Jolla W City Limit Bridge IIIB 0.4 Placentia
La Jolla Ave De Pio Pico Melrose IV 0.3 Placentia
Livingston Placentia Kraemer IIIB 0.6 Placentia
Madison Bradford Kraemer II 0.3 Placentia
Magnolia Neighborhood Greenway Kraemer Central IIIB 1.1 Placentia McCormack Neighborhood Greenway Valencia Golden IIIB 1.2 Placentia Melrose Chapman RR IIIB 0.3 Placentia
Melrose RR S City Limit IV 0.8 Placentia
Morse Neighborhood Greenway Bradford Alta Vista IIIB 1.4 Placentia Palm Yorba Linda Rose IV 1.1 Placentia
Rose N City Limit S City Limit IIB 1.4 Placentia
Santa Fe Placentia Murray IV 0.3 Placentia
Tuffree Tuffree Park Bastanchury IIIB 0.2 Placentia
Valencia N City Limit E Palm IV 1.4 Placentia
Yorba Linda City Limit City Limit IV 1.3 Placentia
Table 10. Placentia Bike Recommendations
237
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 233
Street From Street To Street Class Mileage City
Arroyo Cajon Kellogg Sunmist IIIB 0.26 Yorba Linda
Ave Barcelona End Esperanza IIIB 0.18 Yorba Linda
Buena Vista Richfield Lakeview IIB 0.58 Yorba Linda
Casa Loma Bastanchury Yorba Linda IIIB 0.75 Yorba Linda Dominguez Ranch Yorba Ranch Yorba Ranch IIIB 0.91 Yorba Linda Eastpark Oakcrest Savi Ranch IIIB 0.12 Yorba Linda
Eastpark Old Canal Oakcrest II 0.10 Yorba Linda
El Cajon Prospect Valley View IIIB 0.52 Yorba Linda
Esperanza Fairmont Yorba Linda IIB 1.65 Yorba Linda
Eureka Bastanchury Yorba Linda IIIB 0.75 Yorba Linda
Fairmont* Village Center Paseo de Las Palomas II 2.58 Yorba Linda Fairmont*Paseo de Las Palomas S City Limit II 1.20 Yorba Linda Fairmont Village Center San Antonio IIIB 0.9 Yorba Linda Lakeview Yorba Linda Mariposa Ave II 1.2 Yorba Linda
Lakeview Lemon Yorba Linda IIIB 1.52 Yorba Linda
Lakeview Bastanchury Oriente IIIB 0.37 Yorba Linda
Lemon Imperial Lakeview IIIB 0.30 Yorba Linda
Mariposa End Lakeview IIIB 0.48 Yorba Linda
Old Canal Yorba Linda Savi Ranch II 0.56 Yorba Linda
Oriente Lakeview Palm IIIB 0.75 Yorba Linda
Palm Dead End Yorba Linda IIIB 0.54 Yorba Linda
Paseo De La Cumbre Paseo Del Brado Yorba Ranch IIIB 0.46 Yorba Linda Paseo De Las Palomas Fairmont Village Center IIB 0.93 Yorba Linda Paseo De Las Palomas Yorba Linda Shady Knl IIB 0.50 Yorba Linda Paseo Del Prado Paseo De Las Palomas Travis II 0.49 Yorba Linda Table 11. Yorba Linda Bike Recommendations
Table continued on the following page*Class II recommendation may be buffered where unconstrained by street parking or right-of-way (ROW) 238
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia234
Paseo Del Prado Paseo De Las Palomas Travis IIB 0.37 Yorba Linda Paseo De Toronto Avenida del Tren Camino De Bryant IIIB 0.98 Yorba Linda Plumosa Bastanchury Lemon IIIB 0.56 Yorba Linda
Rose* Wabash Bastanchury II 0.50 Yorba Linda
Rose* Bastanchury S City Limit II 0.75 Yorba Linda
San Antonio Casino Ridge Yorba Linda IIIB 0.99 Yorba Linda San Antonio Fairmont Casino Ridge IIIB 0.4 Yorba Linda
Savi Ranch/Mirage Yorba Linda Old Canal I 0.01 Yorba Linda Savi Ranch Old Canal E Savi Ranch II 0.23 Yorba Linda
E Savi Ranch Savi Ranch Eastpark IIIB 0.13 Yorba Linda
Valley View Lakeview Bastanchury II 1.55 Yorba Linda
Valley View Lakeview Valley View II 0.26 Yorba Linda
Valley View* Brooklyn Bastanchury II 0.16 Yorba Linda
Vista Del Mar Valley Center Valley Center IIIB 1.54 Yorba Linda Wabash Rose Valley View IIIB 0.84 Yorba Linda
Weir Canyon North City Limit Savi Ranch I 0.15 Yorba Linda *Class II recommendation may be buffered where unconstrained by street parking or right-of-way (ROW) 239
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 235
Street Cross Street Recommendation City
Altrudy Lane Lakeview Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Avolinda Drive Plumosa Drive ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Avolinda Drive Eureka Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Bastanchury Road Brookhaven Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Bastanchury Road Young Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Bastanchury Road Cambridge Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Bastanchury Road Tuffree Boulevard High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Bastanchury Road Cambridge Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Bastanchury Road -Signage Yorba Linda
Bastanchury Road School Entrance Signage Yorba Linda
Bastanchury Road Between Kraemer Boulevard and
Brookhaven Avenue
Speed Feedback Sign Placentia
Bastanchury Road Fairmont Boulevard Speed Feedback Sign Yorba Linda Bradford Avenue Primrose Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Bradford Avenue Ruby Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Bradford Avenue Ruby Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Bradford Avenue Primrose Avenue Pedestrian Signals Placentia Bradford Avenue Ruby Drive Pedestrian Signals Placentia Brookhaven Avenue Swanee Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Brookhaven Avenue Swanee Avenue Pedestrian Signals Placentia Brookhaven Avenue -Raised Crosswalk Placentia
Cari Lane Logan Linda Drive Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda Carlsbad Street Mesa Verde Circle ADA Ramps Placentia
Carlsbad Street Mesa Verde Circle High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Cartlen Drive -School Entrance Placentia
Casa Loma Avenue El Cajon Trail ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Casa Loma Avenue Christie Drive ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Table 12. Pedestrian Recommendations
Table continued on the following page
240
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia236
Casa Loma Avenue Elmhurst Circe ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Casa Loma Avenue Elmhurst Circe High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Casa Loma Avenue Imperial Highway High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Casa Loma Avenue El Cajon Trail Yield Markings Yorba Linda Casa Loma Avenue Christie Drive Yield Markings Yorba Linda Center Street Main Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Center Street Melrose Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Center Street Walnut Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Center Street Murray Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Center Street Placentia Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Center Street Main Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Center Street Melrose Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Center Street Alta Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Center Street Walnut Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Center Street Murray Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Center Street Placentia Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Central Avenue -High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia
Central Avenue Stanford Drive Safety Mirror Placentia
Chapman Avenue Kramer Boulevard ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Murray Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Sunset Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Melody Lane ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Walnut Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Melrose Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Main Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Anned Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Angelina Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Chapman Avenue Oahu Way ADA Ramps Placentia
241
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 237
Chapman Avenue Kramer Boulevard High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Angelina Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Murray Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Walnut Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Melrose Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Main Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Anned Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Chapman Avenue Kramer Boulevard Pedestrian Refuge Island Placentia Chapman Avenue Angelina Drive Pedestrian Refuge Island Placentia Crestknoll Drive Glenknoll Drive Parking Restrictions Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Crestknoll Drive Glenknoll Drive Stop Warrant Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Crowther Avenue Porter Way ADA Ramps Placentia
Crowther Avenue Bradford Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Crowther Avenue West of Goetz Place ADA Ramps Placentia Crowther Avenue Porter Way High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Crowther Avenue Melrose Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Dartmouth Way -ADA Ramps Placentia
Deville Drive Avocado Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Dominguez Ranch Road Via De La Escuela High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Dominguez Ranch Road Via Bernardo High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Dominguez Ranch Road Via Del Parque High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Dominguez Ranch Road Via Cota High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Dominguez Ranch Road Via Alisa High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda El Cajon Trail The gate and fence of Agape Church New Access Point Yorba Linda Fairlynn Boulevard Crestknoll Drive ADA Ramps Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Fairlynn Boulevard Crestknoll Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Table continued on the following page*Requires coordination with OCPW 242
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia238
Fairlynn Boulevard Crestknoll Drive Parking Restrictions Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Fairlynn Boulevard Crestknoll Drive Stop Warrant Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Fairmont Boulevard Yorba Linda Boulevard Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)Yorba Linda Fairmont Boulevard Old Ranch Road Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)Yorba Linda Fairmont Boulevard -Speed Feedback Sign Yorba Linda
Fairmont Boulevard -Speed Feedback Sign Yorba Linda
Fairmont Boulevard Avenue Del Rey Traffic Light Yorba Linda Garden Place Imperial Highway ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Garden Place Imperial Highway High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Glenknoll Drive Glenknoll Elementary north parking lot
entrance
Signage Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange
County*
Golden Avenue Golden Way ADA Ramps Placentia
Golden Avenue -Pedestrian Signals Placentia
Grandview Avenue Linda Vista Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Heloise Way -School Entrance Placentia
HS Parking Lot -Parking Lot Improvements Yorba Linda
Imperial Highway Eureka Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Imperial Highway Eureka Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Jefferson Street Carlsbad Street High Visibility Crosswalks and Pavement Markings
Placentia
Joshua Drive Eureka Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Kraemer Boulevard Crowther Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Kraemer Boulevard Bagnall Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Kraemer Boulevard Blueridge Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Kraemer Boulevard Patrician Lane Pedestrian Refuge Island Placentia La Jolla Street Moisi Lane ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Wallgreen Street ADA Ramps Placentia
*Requires coordination with OCPW
243
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 239
La Jolla Street Lawrence Street ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Arnold Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Avenue De Pio Pico ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Cypress Street ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Cypress Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Vista Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Tafolla Street ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Melrose Street ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Ortega Way ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Segovia Circle ADA Ramps Placentia
La Jolla Street Wallgreen Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia La Jolla Street Cypress Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia La Jolla Street Cypress Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia La Jolla Street Vista Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia La Jolla Street Avenue De Pio Pico Pedestrian Refuge Island Placentia La Jolla Street Avenue De Pio Pico Pedestrian Signals Placentia La Jolla Street -Signage Placentia
La Jolla Street -Signage Yorba Linda
La Jolla Street -Speed Feedback Sign Placentia
Lakeview Avenue Packing House Square Driveway ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Lakeview Avenue Mountain View Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Lakeview Avenue Valley View Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lakeview Avenue -Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon Yorba Linda
Lakeview Avenue -Trail Connectivity Improvements Yorba Linda Larkridge Drive Glenknoll Drive Parking Restrictions Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Larkridge Drive Glenknoll Elementary south
parking lot entrance
Signage Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange
County*
Table continued on the following page*Requires coordination with OCPW 244
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia240
Larkridge Drive Glenknoll Drive Stop Warrant Unincorporated Yorba Linda Orange County*
Lemon Drive Plumosa Drive ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Lemon Drive Imperial Highway ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Lemon Drive Plumosa Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive Olinda Street High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive Main Street High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive School Street High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive Valencia Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive Lakeview Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive Imperial Highway High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive Eureka Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Lemon Drive East Imperial Highway ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Lemon Drive East Imperial Highway High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Linda Verde Street Grandview Avenue Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda Linda Verde Street The driveway of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints
Signage Yorba Linda
Madison Avenue Kevin Way Yield Markings Placentia
Mandarin Lane Plumosa Drive ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Mandarin Lane Plumosa Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Manor View Drive Futura Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Melody Lane Chapman Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Melody Lane Chapman Avenue Pedestrian Refuge Island Placentia Mignon Way -Signage Placentia
Morse Avenue Cypress Point Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Morse Avenue Cherry Hills Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Morse Avenue Hacienda Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Morse Avenue El Dorado Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Morse Avenue Limerick Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
245
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 241
Morse Avenue Cherry Hills Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Morse Avenue Cypress Point Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Morse Avenue Limerick Drive Stop Warrant Placentia
Oak Tree Court Avocado Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Oak Tree Court Avocado Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Ohio Street Linda Verde Street Signage Yorba Linda
Olinda Street Imperial Highway ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Olinda Street Imperial Highway High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Orangethorpe Avenue Placentia Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue Hundley Way ADA Ramps Placentia
Orangethorpe Avenue Ohio Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Orangethorpe Avenue Iowa Place ADA Ramps Placentia
Orangethorpe Avenue Melrose Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Orangethorpe Avenue Placentia Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue Tafolla Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue Placentia Avenue Pedestrian Refuge Island Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue Jefferson Street Pedestrian Scale Lighting Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue Iowa Place Signage Placentia
Oriente Drive Lakeview Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Oriente Drive Boeing Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Oriente Drive Lakeview Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Oriente Drive Boeing Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Paseo De Toronto Elizabeth Drive Signage Yorba Linda
Piper Place Plumosa Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Placentia Avenue Santa Fe Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Placentia Avenue Via Burton ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Placentia Avenue La Jolla Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Placentia Avenue Lewis Place High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Placentia Avenue Whitten Way High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Table continued on the following page
246
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia242
Placentia Avenue Rospaw Way High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Placentia Avenue Wooden Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Placentia Avenue St John Way High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Placentia Avenue -High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia
Placentia Avenue Santa Fe Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Placentia Avenue Via Burton High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Placentia Avenue Clairmont Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Placentia Avenue -Keep Clear Marking Placentia
Placentia Avenue Clairmont Avenue Pedestrian Signals Yorba Linda Plumosa Drive The driveway entrance of Mabel M Paine
Elementary
Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda
Plumosa Drive Cari Lane Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda Plumosa Drive Piper Place Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda Plumosa Drive The driveway exit of Mabel M Paine
Elementary
Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda
Plumosa Drive Cari Lane Pedestrian Signals Yorba Linda
Plumosa Drive Carie Lane Signage Yorba Linda
Plumosa Drive Piper Place Signage Yorba Linda
Primrose Avenue Twilight Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Primrose Avenue Twilight Street Yield Markings Placentia Rio de Plata Drive Lakeview Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Rose Drive mid block in front of school High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Rose Drive Saga Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Rose Drive Verna Lane High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Rose Drive Verna Lane Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda
Royal Stewart at Park -School Entrance Placentia
Ruby Drive Twilight Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Ruby Drive Stardust Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Ruby Drive Moonbeam Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia 247
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 243
Ruby Drive Diamond Road High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Ruby Drive Diamond Road Stop Warrant Placentia
Santa Fe Avenue Camarillo Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Santa Fe Avenue Santa Barbara Street ADA Ramps Placentia Santa Fe Avenue Capistrano Street ADA Ramps Placentia
Santa Fe Avenue Santa Barbara Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Stanford Drive Central Avenue Parking Restrictions Placentia Stanford Road Dartmouth Way High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Swanee Avenue Brookhaven Ave ADA Ramps Placentia
Tafolla Street La Jolla Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Trumpet Avenue Cartlen Drive ADA Ramps Placentia
Trumpet Avenue Seville Street High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Trumpet Avenue Cartlen Drive Yield Markings Placentia
Trumpet Avenue -Yield Markings Placentia
Valencia Avenue Golden Avenue Lane removal for bike lane, curb extensions
Placentia
Van Buren Street Glasgow Circle High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Van Buren Street Yellowstone Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Van Buren Street Sequoia Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Placentia Van Buren Street La Collette Place High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Yorba Linda Boulevard High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Stafford Road High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Yellowstone Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Yorkshire Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Lawndale Place High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Hillwood Place High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street Hillwood Drive High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Van Buren Street -Traffic Calming Features Yorba Linda
Via De La Escuela Via Del Acero ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Table continued on the following page
248
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia244
Via De La Escuela Via del Acero Curb Extension Yorba Linda Via De La Escuela Via Del Fierro High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Via De La Escuela Via Del Acero High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Via De La Escuela Via Del Fierro Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda Via De La Escuela Via Del Acero Parking Restrictions Yorba Linda Wagner Elementary West Boundary A catwalk from Seville Street School Entrance Placentia Wisteria Drive Eureka Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda
Wisteria Drive Eureka Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Wisteria Drive Eureka Avenue Pedestrian Signals Yorba Linda Wisteria Drive Eureka Avenue Raised Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Kilt Avenue ADA Ramps Placentia
Yorba Linda Boulevard Lakeview Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Lakeview Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Imperial Highway ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Eureka Avenue ADA Ramps Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Casa Loma Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Avocado Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Lakeview Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Lakeview Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Via De La Escuela High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Eureka Avenue High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Fairmont Boulevard High Visibility Crosswalk Yorba Linda Yorba Linda Boulevard Seville Street Parking Restrictions Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard Kilt Avenue Safety Mirror Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard Kilt Avenue Traffic Light Placentia 249
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 245
Appendix F: Concept Schematics
VÍA
E
N
C
A
N
T
O
OHIO STOhio Street
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Proposed paved multi-use path along
Ohio Street*
Proposed ADA curb ramps
3 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
1 2
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
22’
8’
4 Proposed signage (showing allowed use for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians)
3 4
4 Matchline - See Next Page
*Constraints including ROW and sidewalk
policy in this neighborhood will need to be
addressed prior to path implementation.
250
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia246
8 Ohio Street
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
5 6
Proposed paved multi-use path along
Ohio Street*
Proposed ADA curb ramps
7 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
5 6
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
22’
8’
8 Proposed signage (showing allowed use for
pedestrians, bicyclists, and equestrians)
7 OHIO STMO
U
N
T
A
I
N
V
I
E
W
A
V
E
Matchline - See Previous Page
*Constraints including ROW and sidewalk
policy in this neighborhood will need to be
addressed prior to path implementation.
251
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 247
82 ’
7’4’
24 ’
14 ’
6’ESPERANZA RDMatchline - See Next Page NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Esperanza Road
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Propsed bike lanes with buffers
(Class IIB Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
1 2
252
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia248
Matchline - See Previous Page
Woodsboro
Elementary SchoolESPERANZA RD82
’
7’
4’
2 4
’
14 ’
6’
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Esperanza Road
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
3 4
Propsed bike lanes with buffers
(Class IIB Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
3 4
253
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 249BRADFORD AVERUBY DR ORANG
E
GROVE
A
V
E
Valencia
High School
Matchline - See Next Page NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Bradford Avenue
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Propsed shared used pavement markings
along Bradford Ave (Class III Bicycle Route)
Proposed ADA curb ramps
3 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
4 Proposed Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
(RRFB) across Bradford Ave
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=60’
1 2
3 4
254
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia250
Matchline - See Previous Page
PRIMRO
S
E
D
R BRADFORD AVEValencia
High School
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Bradford Avenue
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
5 6
Propsed shared used pavement markings
along Bradford Ave (Class III Bicycle Route)
Proposed ADA curb ramps
7 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
8 Proposed Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB)
across Bradford Ave
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=60’
5 6
7 8
255
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 251
5’2’
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Drive
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Propsed bike lane with curb separation
(Class IV Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
3 Proposed green conflict striping across
intersection crossing
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
5 1
2 3
4 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
4 5 Proposed ADA curb ramps
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Drive
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Propsed bike lane with curb separation
(Class IV Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
3 Proposed green conflict striping across
intersection crossing
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
5 1
2 3
4 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
4 5 Proposed ADA curb ramps
Matchline - See Next Page
24’
8’7’PALM DRY
O
R
B
A
L
I
N
D
A
B
L
V
D
ANGELINA DR
256
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia252
Matchline - See Previous Page
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Drive
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Propsed bike lane with curb separation
(Class IV Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
3 Proposed green conflict striping across
intersection crossing
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
10 4 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
5 Proposed ADA curb ramps
NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Palm Drive
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
6 7
Propsed bike lane with curb separation
(Class IV Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
8 Proposed green conflict striping across
intersection crossing
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
6 7
8 9 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
10 Proposed ADA curb ramps
9 5’2’
24’
8’7’
TO Morse Elementary School
PALM DRCYPRESS POINT DR
LARRY LN257
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 253MELROSE ST
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
Whitten
Community Center
Melrose
Elementary School
Matchline - See Next PageNOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Melrose Street
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
1 2
Propsed bike lane with buffer + flexposts,
spaced 10’ O.C. (Class IV Bicycle Route)
Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
3 Proposed ADA curb ramps
1 2
3 4 Proposed green conflict striping
5 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
4 5
14’
5’
2’22’
8’
3’
7’
258
Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia254
5’
2’
22’
8’
7’
4 NOTE: CONCEPT ONLY, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Melrose Street
Active Transportation Plan Recommendations
4 5
Propsed bike lane with buffer + flexposts,
spaced 10’ O.C. (Class IV Bicycle Route)
Proposed green conflict striping
6 Proposed high visibility crosswalk
0’50’100’
Scale: 1”=50’
Matchline - See Previous Page
MELROSE ST
LA JOLLA
S
T
5 6
7 Proposed ADA curb ramps
8 Proposed bike lane symbol and arrow
pavement markings
7 8
259
AppendicesActive Transportation Plan 255
Section Name Level (Standard / Guidance)
CAMUTCD Language Checklist Language School #1 - Bernardo Yorba Middle School #2 - Brookhaven Elementary School #3 - Bryant Ranch Elementary School #4 - Charles Wagner Elementary School #5, #6 - Col. J.K. Tuffree Middle and Parkview School School #7 - El Camino Real Continuation High School #8 - El Dorado High School #9 - Farimont Elementary School #10, #11 - Golden Elementary and George Key School School #12 - Glenknoll Elementary School #13 - John O. Tynes Elementary School #14 - Kraemer Middle School #15 - Valencia High School #16 - Lakeview Elementary School #17 - Linda Vista Elementary School #18 - Mabel M. Paine Elementary School #19, #20 - Melrose Elementary and Valadez Middle School #21 - Morse Elementary School #22 - Rose Drive Elementary School #23 - Ruby Drive Elementary School #24 - Sierra Vista Elementary School #25 - Travis Ranch School (K-8)School #26 - Van Buren Elementary School #27 - Yorba Linda High School #28 - Yorba Linda Middle 7B.01 Size of School Signes Standard Except as provided in Section 2A.11, the sizes of signs and plaques to be used on conventional roadways in school areas shall be as shown in Table 7B-1 and 7B-1(CA). 7B.01 Size of School Signes Standard The sizes in the Conventional Road column shall be used unless engineering judgment determines that a minimum or oversized sign size would be more appropriate. 7B.01 Size of School Signes Standard The sizes in the Minimum column shall be used only where traffic volumes are low and speeds are 25 mph or lower, as determined by engineering judgment.Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7B.01 Size of School Signes Standard The sizes in the Oversized column shall be used on expressways.Do signs on expressways appear to be the proper size?Example: 48 in x 60 in for School Warning Assembly A (CA)Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable No Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7B.01 Size of School Signes Guidance The sizes in the Oversized column should be used on roadways that have four or more lanes with posted speed limits of 40 mph or higher.Do signs on 4+ lane roadways with 40+ mph speed limits appear to be the proper size?Example: 48 in x 60 in for School Warning Assembly A (CA) Not applicable No Not applicable Yes Yes Yes on Jefferson StNo on Orangethorpe Ave Yes Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7B.07 Sign Color for School Warning Signs Standard School warning signs, including any supplemental plaques used in association with these warning signs, shall have a fluorescent yellow-green background with a black legend and border unless otherwise provided in this Manual for a specific sign.
Are all school warning signs fluorescent yellow-green background with black legend and border?No Yes Yes Yes Yes, however it should be noted the reflectivity of the School (S1-1) sign on Northbound Tuffree Blvd is visibly faded.
No, the word "SCHOOL" in the SR4-1(CA) School Speed Limit Sign Assembly C(CA) along Northbound approach of Jefferson St at Orangethorpe Ave is a dark yellow instead of flourescent.
No, the S1-1 sign on the Westbound approach of Orangethorpe Ave is dark yellow instead of flourescent.
Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No on Southbound approach on Ohio Street near Buena Vista Ave (dark yellow instead of flourescent yellow) No on Northbound approach of Plumosa Drive near Avolinda Drive (dark yellow instead of flourescent yellow) No on Northbound approach of Plumosa Drive near Cari Lane (dark yellow instead of flourescent yellow) No on both approaches of La Jolla St crossing near Segovia Dr (dark yellow instead of flourescent yellow) No, the word "SCHOOL" in the SR4-1(CA) School Speed Limit Sign Assembly C(CA) along Northbound approach of Melrose St near Via Martens is a dark yellow instead of flourescent.
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
7B.09 School Zone Sign (S1-1) and Plaques (S4-3P, S4-7P) and END SCHOOL ZONE Sign (S5-2) Standard If a school zone has been designated under State or local statute, a School (S1-1) sign (see Figure 7B-1 or 7B-1(CA)) shall be installed to identify the beginning point(s) of the designated school zone.
Is a School (S1-1) sign seen?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7B.09 School Zone Sign (S1-1) and Plaques (S4-3P, S4-7P) and END SCHOOL ZONE Sign (S5-2) Standard The School Warning Assembly A(CA) shall be used on streets with prima facie 25 mph speed limits that are contiguous to a school building or school grounds.If 25mph speed limit, is School Warning Assembly A(CA) used?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Yes No on both approaches on Royal Stewart Dr No on both approaches on Fairlynn Blvd, Crestknoll Drive, and Larkidge Dr Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes No on Northbound approach on Plumosa Dr Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 7B.11 School Advance Crossing Assembly Standard The School Advance Crossing assembly (see Figure 7B-1 or 7B-1(CA)) shall consist of a School Advance warning Assembly D(CA), or a School (S1-1) sign supplemented with an AHEAD (W16-9P) plaque or an XX FEET (W16-2P or W16-2aP) plaque. 7B.11 School Advance Crossing Assembly Standard Except as provided in Paragraph 3, a School Advance Crossing assembly or Assembly D(CA) shall be used in advance (see Table 2C-4 for advance placement guidelines) of the first School Crossing assembly (see Section 7B.12) that is encountered in each direction as traffic approaches a school crosswalk (see Figure 7B-4).
Option: The School Advance Crossing assembly or Assembly D(CA) may be omitted (see Figure 7B-5) where a School Zone (S1-1) sign (see Section 7B.09) is installed to identify the beginning of a school zone in advance of the School Crossing assembly. 7B.11 School Advance Crossing Assembly Standard The School Advance Warning Assembly D(CA) shall be used in advance of any School Crosswalk Warning Assembly B(CA), School Crosswalk Warning Assembly E(CA) or the School Speed Limit Assembly C(CA). 7B.12 School Crossing Assembly Standard If used, the School Crossing assembly Assembly B(CA) (see Figure 7B-1 or 7B-1(CA)) shall be installed at the school crossing (see Figures 7B-4 and 7B-5), or as close to it as possible, and shall consist of a School (S1-1) sign supplemented with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque to show the location of the crossing. 7B.12 School Crossing Assembly Standard The School Crosswalk Warning Assembly B(CA) or E(CA) shall be posted at all yellow school crosswalks that are not controlled by a STOP (R1-1) sign, a YIELD (R1-2) sign or a traffic signal. 7B.12 School Crossing Assembly Standard The School Crossing assembly Assembly B(CA) or E(CA) shall not be installed on approaches controlled by a STOP (R1-1) sign, a or YIELD (R1-2) sign or a traffic signal.Is School Crosswalk Warning Assembly B(CA) [School Sign with diagonal-down arrow] erroneously installed at approaches with a STOP sign, YIELD sign, or traffic signal? Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 7B.12 School Crossing Assembly Standard If used, the School Crosswalk Warning Assembly E(CA) (see Figures 7B-1(CA) and 7B-101(CA) through 7B104(CA)) shall be installed in an overhead location at the marked crosswalk, or as close to it as possible, and shall consist of a modified R1-9 sign to show the location of the crossing.
If an overhead School Crossing sign is used, does it match Figure 7B-101(CA) and 7B-104(CA) installation guidance? Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable 7B.12 School Crossing Assembly Standard If an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, an In-Street Schoolchildren Crossing sign, or a reduced size in-street School (S1-1) sign is placed in the roadway, the sign support shall comply with the mounting height and special mounting support requirements for In-Street Pedestrian Crossing (R1-6 or R1-6a) signs (see Section 2B.12). 7B.12 School Crossing Assembly Standard The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, the In-Street Schoolchildren Crossing sign, the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign, and the reduced size in-street School (S1-1) sign shall not be used at controlled approaches. 7B.15 School Speed Limit Assembly (S4-1P, S4-2P, S4-3P, S4-4P, S4-6P, S5-1) and END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT Sign (S5-3) Standard If a reduced school speed limit zone has been established, a School (S1-1) sign shall be installed in advance (see Table 2C-4 for advance placement guidelines) of the first School Speed Limit sign assembly that is encountered in each direction as traffic approaches the reduced school speed limit zone (see Figure 7B-5).
If used, do the school zone speed limit signs provide clear and consistent information of the school zone speed limit?Yes for Northbound Fairmont Blvd approachNo for Southbound Fairmont Blvd approach Yes for all approaches No Yes for both approaches on Yorba Linda Blvd Yes on both approaches on Kraemer Blvd No for both approaches on Jefferson St Yes Yes for Northbound Fairmont Blvd approachNo for Southbound Fairmont Blvd approach Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes No on both approaches of Lakeview Avenue, but especially the Westbound approach Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No for Northbound approach on Casa Loma Ave 7B.15 School Speed Limit Assembly (S4-1P, S4-2P, S4-3P, S4-4P, S4-6P, S5-1) and END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT Sign (S5-3) Standard The downstream end of an authorized and posted reduced school speed limit zone shall be identified with an END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT (S5-3) and/or Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figures 7B-1, 7B-1(CA), 7B-5 and 7B-5(CA)).
If there is a school zone speed limit, is an END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT present for each zone?No for both approaches on Fairmont Blvd Yes for all approaches No Yes for Westbound approach on Yorba Linda BlvdNo for Eastbound approach on Yorba Linda Blvd Yes on Northbound approach on Kraemer BlvdNo on Southbound approach on Kraemer Blvd No for both approaches on Jefferson St and Orangethorpe Ave Yes for Southbound approach on Valencia AveNo for Northbound approach Valencia Ave No for both approaches on Fairmont Blvd No for both approaches of Golden Ave and Valencia Ave Not applicable Yes for Southbound on Central AveNo for Northbound on Central Ave No for both approaches on Angelina DrNot applicable to the olther streets evaluated No for both approaches on Bradford Ave No, on Southbound approach of Valley View Ave Not applicable Not applicable No on both approaches on Melrose StNo on Westbound approach on La Jolla St No on both approaches of Morse Ave Yes No for both approaches on Bradford Ave No for both approaches on Placentia Ave and Bastanchury Rd No for both approaches on Yorba Linda Blvd No for both approaches on Van Buren St No for both approaches on Fairmont Blvd and Bastanchury Rd No for both approaches on Casa Loma Ave 7B.15 School Speed Limit Assembly (S4-1P, S4-2P, S4-3P, S4-4P, S4-6P, S5-1) and END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT Sign (S5-3) Standard The fixed-message School Speed Limit Assembly C(CA) shall consist of a top plaque (S4-3P) with the legend SCHOOL, a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign, and a bottom plaque WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT Does the School Speed Limit Assembly C(CA) match Figure 7B-1(CA)?Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7B.15 School Speed Limit Assembly (S4-1P, S4-2P, S4-3P, S4-4P, S4-6P, S5-1) and END SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT Sign (S5-3) Standard The “WHEN FLASHING” and specific time period messages shall not be used in school areas in California as they are not supported by CVC 22352. Hence, the Specific Time Period Plaque (S4-1P), WHEN FLASHING (S4-4P) and SCHOOL SPEED LIMIT 20 WHEN FLASHING (S5-1) signs shall not be used in California.
Only WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT plaque should be used on a School Speed Limit Assembly. Are any of the following plaques erroneously used: WHEN FLASHING, , MON-FRI, or another similar message? No No Not applicable No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 7B.16 Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead Sign (S4-5, S4-5a)Standard If used, the Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead sign shall be followed by a School Speed Limit sign or a School Speed Limit Assembly C(CA). 7B.16 Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead Sign (S4-5, S4-5a)Standard The speed limit displayed on the Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead sign shall be identical to the speed limit displayed on the subsequent School Speed Limit sign or School Speed Limit assembly Assembly C(CA). 7C.02 Crosswalk Markings Standard When transverse crosswalk lines are used, they shall be solid white or yellow, marking both edges of the crosswalk, except as noted in the Option. Refer to CVC 21368. They shall be not less than 12 inches nor greater than 24 inches in width. 7C.02 Crosswalk Markings Standard Whenever a marked pedestrian crosswalk has been established in a roadway contiguous to a school building or school grounds, it shall be yellow. If any one of the crosswalks is required to be yellow at an intersection, then all other marked pedestrian crosswalks at that intersection shall also be yellow. Refer to CVC 21368. 7C.02 Crosswalk Markings Guidance If transverse crosswalk lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 6 feet. If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk width should not be less than 6 feet.
Is that gap between crosswalk lines at least 6 ft wide?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7C.02 Crosswalk Markings Guidance Crosswalk lines on both sides of the crosswalk should extend across the full width of pavement or to the edge of the intersecting crosswalk to discourage diagonal walking between crosswalks.Does the crosswalk extend across the full width of pavement or an intersecting crosswalk?Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No at Kraemer Blvd and Alta Vista St Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 7C.02 Crosswalk Markings Guidance Because non-intersection school crossings are generally unexpected by the road user, warning signs (see Sections 7B.11 and 7B.12) should be installed for all marked school crosswalks at non-intersection locations. Adequate visibility of students by approaching motorists and of approaching motorists by students should be provided by parking prohibitions or other appropriate measures.
Do all non-intersection (i.e., mid-block) school crossings include school crossing warning signs?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes 7C.02 Crosswalk Markings Guidance Diagonal or longitudinal markings should be used when a crosswalk is marked at an uncontrolled crossing location. The diagonal or longitudinal lines should be 12 to 24 inches wide and spaced 12 to 60 inches apart. The spacing design should avoid the wheel paths.
Are non-intersection (i.e., mid-block) school crossings marked with diagonal or longitudinal lines (e.g., "ladder" markings or similar diagonal markings)?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes 7C.03 Pavement Word, Symbol, and Arrow Markings Standard If used, the SCHOOL pavement marking shown in Figure 7C-101(CA) shall be used and it shall be restricted to a single lane.If used, does SCHOOL, SCHOOL XING, and SLOW SCHOOL XING pavement marking match Figure 7C-101(CA)?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes 7C.03 Pavement Word, Symbol, and Arrow Markings Standard The SLOW SCHOOL XING marking shall be used in accordance with the provisions of CVC 21368 in advance of all yellow school crosswalks (see Figure 7C-101(CA)). They shall not be used where the crossing is controlled by stop signs, traffic signals, or yield signs. They shall be yellow, with the word XING at least 100 feet in advance of the school crosswalk.
Is SLOW SCHOOL XING erroneously used at an intersection approach controlled by STOP sign, YIELD sign, or traffic signal? Is the word XING at least 100 ft in advance of the school crosswalk? Not applicable No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk Not applicable No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk Not applicable No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk No Not applicable No, not used erroneously
No, less than 100 feet in advance on Northbound approach Bradford Ave at Ruby Dr crossing No, less than 100 feet in advance on Southbound approach Bradford Ave at Wilson Ave crossing Not applicable Not applicable No, not used erroneously
No, less than 100 feet in advance on Northbound approach of Plumosa Dr at Cari Ln crossing No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk No, not used erroneously.Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk Not applicable No, not used erroneously
No, less than 100 feet in advance on Northbound approach Bradford Ave at Ruby Dr crossing No, less than 100 feet in advance on Westbound approach Madison Ave nearTwilight Ln crossing Not applicable No, not used erroneously.
Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk
No, not used erroneously.
Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk
Not applicable No, not used erroneously.
Yes, it is 100 feet in advance of the crosswalk
7C.03 Pavement Word, Symbol, and Arrow Markings Standard If the SCHOOL marking is used with the School Assemblies A(CA) or C(CA) (See Section 7B.11), it shall be yellow.If used with School Assembly A(CA) or C(CA), is SCHOOL marking yellow?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes 7C.03 Pavement Word, Symbol, and Arrow Markings Guidanace If used, the SCHOOL marking should be located adjacent to the School Assemblies A(CA) or C(CA) (See Section 7B.11).If used with School Assembly A(CA) or C(CA), is SCHOOL marking located adjacent to that sign assembly?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes No on both approaches of Kraemer Blvd before the pedestrian crossing at Patrician Ln No on both approaches of Orangethorpe Ave Yes Not applicable No Yes Not applicable Not applicable No on Northbound approach of Bradford Ave near Orchid Dr Not applicable Not applicable No for Northbound approach on Plumosa Dr No for both approaches on La Jolla St No for both approaches on Morse Ave Not applicable No (Madison Ave and Twilight Ln)Not applicable No, for both approaches on Via De La Escuela No for both approaches on Van Buren Street Not applicable Yes Yes No
Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Do all signs provide at least 7 ft. clearance (from sidewalk to bottom of sign)? Do signs on conventional appear to be the proper size?Example: 36 in x 48 for School Warning Assembly A (CA) Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetViewCannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cells highlighted in orange indicate CAMUTCD standard(s) are not being met.Trafiic Control Device Requirements in School Zones Yes Yes
Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetViewCannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Cannot be evaluated on Google StreetView Yes Not applicable Yes No applicable Yes YesIf 30+ mph speed limit, is School Warning Assembly D(CA) used?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes No for both approaches on Casa Loma Ave No for both approaches on Casa Loma AveIs School Crosswalk Warning Assembly B(CA) [School Sign with diagonal-down arrow] installed at each school crosswalk, including intersection approaches not controlled by a STOP sign, YIELD sign, or traffic signal? No Yes No Yes No No
No on both approaches of Lakeview Ave and Valley View Ave Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes No NoYesNoYesYes Yes Yes
Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Yes
No No Yes
has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed Are all crosswalks continguous to school ground yellow and approximately 12-24 inches wide?Yes Yes Yes Yes, however, it should be noted that these pavement markings need to restriped as it is heavily faded (both approaches on Yorba Linda).
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Not applicable Not applicable Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes Not applicable Not applicableNot applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable Not applicableNoNot applicable has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed Not applicable
has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewedMake note of any in-street pedestrian crossing or school sign to recommend field review, since these signs are often struck by vehicles, making Google Streetview an improper tool for assessment. has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed has not been reviewed If a Reduced School Speed Limit Ahead (S4-5) is used, is it followed by a School Speed Limit sign? Do the speed limits match?Not applicable Yes Not applicable Yes Not applicable Not applicable Appendix G: School Zone Traffic Control Devices Assessment Checklist 260
256Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
FATALITY AND SERIOUSLY INJURED PEDESTRIANS
OR BICYCLISTS: CRASH LOCATIONS ASSESSMENT
DATE: August 27, 2024
TO: Les Brown | Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
Ashley Haire | Alta Planning + Design, Inc.
FROM: Brian Chandler | DKS Associates
Crystal Chavez | DKS Associates
SUBJECT: Yorba Linda Active Transportation Project Project # 24305-000
COUNTERMEASURES
This project aims to address the 11 locations in Yorba Linda and Placentia that have experienced a bicyclist- and/or pedestrian-involved crash resulting in a fatality or serious injury (i.e., KSI crash) from 2018 to 2023. The primary objective is to conduct a desk-level assessment of each site using Google Maps to identify existing safety-related elements and provide a list of potential countermeasures that could help reduce the likelihood of future crashes. Through this approach, the consultant team aspires to provide Yorba Linda and Placentia with potential treatments to improve the local road safety infrastructure, reduce the frequency of crashes at these locations, and foster an environment for safe travel.
FATAL AND SERIOUS INJURY CRASH LOCATIONS
The limited crash information available for the 11 locations gave the team an insight into whether a pedestrian or cyclist was involved and what the party was doing prior to the crash. There are also notes on whether alcohol was involved and whether they were injured or if it was a fatal crash.
The KSI crash locations are:
Location Reported Ped/Bike-involved KSI Crash(es)
1. Valley View Circle & Bramble
Court – City of Yorba Linda
Date: 10/16/2022
Pedestrian involved
Alcohol involved
1 injured
Unknown violation category - pedestrian was not on the road Appendix H: Crash Locations Assessment
261
257Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 2
2. North Rose Drive & Landmark
Avenue – City of Yorba Linda
Date: 9/17/2022
Pedestrian involved
1 fatality
Pedestrian violation
3. Casa Loma Avenue & Imperial
Highway (State Route 90) –
City of Yorba Linda
Date: 7/19/2022
Pedestrian involved
Alcohol involved
6 injured
Driving under the influence-pedestrian was not on the road
4. Stonewood Drive & Hidden Hills
Road – City of Yorba Linda
Date: 6/17/2021
Cyclists involved
1 injured
Automobile Right of Way
Date: 7/10/2019
Cyclists involved
1 injured
Automobile Right of Way
5. North Kraemer Boulevard &
East Bastanchury Road – City
of Placentia
Date: 5/29/2021
Cyclists involved
Alcohol involved
3 injured
Driving under the influence
6. Dorinda Road & Yorba Linda
Boulevard – City of Yorba Linda
Date: 1/16/2021
Pedestrian involved
1 fatality
Pedestrian violation - crossing not in crosswalk
7. Welsh Pony Lane & Red Roan
Lane – City of Yorba Linda
Date: 11/1/2020
Pedestrian involved
Alcohol involved
1 injured
Improper turning - Pedestrian was crossing in crosswalk at intersection
8. Van Buren Street & Yorba
Linda Boulevard – City of Yorba
Linda
Date: 9/2/2020
Cyclists involved
Alcohol involved
1 injured
Unsafe speed
9. South Melrose Street & West
La Jolla Street – City of
Placentia
Date: 5/7/2020
Cyclists involved
1 injured
Improper turning
262
258Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 3
10. Casa Oro Drive & Casa
Hermosa Drive – City of Yorba
Linda
Date: 12/26/2019
Pedestrian involved
1 fatality
Driving under the influence
Pedestrian was in the road
11. North Community Drive &
Orangethorpe Avenue – City of
Placentia
Date: 1/5/2018
Pedestrian involved
1 injured
Pedestrian Violation - Crossing not in crosswalk
SITE EVALUATIONS
1. VALLEY VIEW CIRCLE & BRAMBLE COURT
Crash Event: 10/16/2022; Pedestrian involved; Alcohol involved; 1 injured; Unknown violation category - Pedestrian was not on the road
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
This intersection is in a residential neighborhood, approximately 0.5 miles from the nearest major arterial. It is a three-leg intersection that is stop controlled for Bramble Court. Valley View Circle has a posted speed limit of 35 mph and a northbound left-turn lane at the intersection. Bamble Court provides access to the homes in the cul-de-sac and has a notable vertical slope and horizontal curvature that could limit intersection sight distance for all road users. There are no bike lanes and no marked crosswalks at or near this intersection, but the east side of the intersection appears to have access to a separated shared-use path, and the west side sidewalks showed pedestrian activity in the Google Street View images. The recent crashes reported at this intersection both involved a driver under the influence of alcohol and a pedestrian. Figure 1 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 1: Valley View Circle & Bramble Court - Aerial
263
259Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 4
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include
● Speed Management. The 35 mph posted speed limit and lack of horizontal curve warning signs may result in motor vehicle drivers traveling too fast for the existing roadway conditions.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for Valley View Circle, considering bicyclist and pedestrian activity. ○ Calculate the proper horizontal curve warning sign speed (e.g., through a ball-bank assessment) and ensure warning signs meet the current CAMUTCD standard.
Consider signing beyond the minimum standard, due to the history of crashes and the vertical curvature.
● Traffic Calming Treatments. Installing speed management treatments (e.g., a speed bump) in the area can reduce potential unsafe speeds near the neighborhood, however, further studies must be done to justify the installation. ● Pedestrian Crossing. Installing a marked crosswalk across Valley View Circle with appropriate signage and pavement markings would provide pedestrians with a designated crossing point.
○ Speed Table. There is a trail adjacent to Valley View Circle. Improved crossing treatments, such as a speed table, would provide a safer and a more seamless connection for active transportation users.
○ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon. To improve pedestrian visibility and crossing safety, installing a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) adjacent to the trail would alert drivers to the presence of pedestrians and encourage them to yield.
2. NORTH ROSE DRIVE & LANDMARK AVENUE
Crash Event: 9/17/2022; Pedestrian involved; 1 fatality; Pedestrian violation
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
Rose Drive runs north-south, serving as a major arterial road connecting the neighborhood and local businesses, and has a 40 mph speed limit. Landmark Avenue provides access to the residential neighborhood and cul-de-sacs. This is a three-leg intersection with Landmark Avenue - the side street - being stop controlled. There are no bike lanes and no marked crosswalks at this intersection. Sidewalks are present along both sides of both roadways. North Rose Drive is a 5-lane cross section (2 lanes per direction and a center two-way-left-turn lane). Outside/curbside lanes appear wider than 12 feet. There are no businesses or other identified destinations in the direct path of the intersection. “Keep Clear” pavement markings in the northbound lanes of North Rose Drive indicate that northbound traffic queues into this intersection from the Imperial Highway (State Route 90) intersection, which is approximately 500 feet to the north. The fatal crash that occurred at this intersection involved an unspecified pedestrian violation. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
264
260Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 5
FIGURE 2: North Rose Drive & Landmark Avenue - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include the following:
● Pedestrian Crossing. Installing a marked crosswalk across Rose Drive with appropriate signage and pavement markings would provide pedestrians with a safer designated crossing point.
○ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon. To improve pedestrian visibility and crossing safety, installing a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at the crosswalk would alert drivers to the presence of pedestrians and encourage them to yield. ● Speed Management.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for North Rose Drive, considering bicyclist and pedestrian activity. ○ Install speed feedback signs to help reduce drivers traveling above the posted speed limit.
3. CASA LOMA AVENUE & IMPERIAL HIGHWAY (STATE ROUTE 90) Crash Event: 7/19/2022; Pedestrian involved; Alcohol involved; 6 injured; Driving under the influence-pedestrian was not on the road 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
Casa Loma Avenue runs north-south and has a 30 mph posted speed limit. The north leg is more of a residential area, and the south leg provides access to nearby recreational facilities. Imperial Highway (State Route 90) runs east-west, serving as a major arterial road connecting various
1 From additional searching of news articles for this crash event, it appears 4 law enforcement officers were arresting one person when an impaired driver struck multiple pedestrians and a nearby vehicle.
265
261Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 6
neighborhoods and businesses, and has a 50-mph speed limit. The Yorba Linda Community Center is located on the southwest corner of this intersection, which may generate pedestrian and bicyclist activity. This is a signalized intersection with protected left turns for Imperial Highway (State Route 90) and permissive left turns for Casa Loma Avenue. There are yellow standard crosswalks across each intersection leg and no bike lanes along either street. The recent crash reported at this intersection involved a driver under the influence of alcohol and several pedestrians; a total of six people were injured. Four were pedestrians, one was a passenger in a vehicle struck in the accident and the other was the driver who caused the crash. Figure 3 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 3: Casa Loma Avenue & Imperial Highway (State Route 90) - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments included:
● Pedestrian Visibility Improvements. High visibility crosswalk designs at the intersection can increase driver’s awareness of pedestrian and bicyclist activity at those crossings. ● Speed Management. The 50 mph posted speed limit encourages speeds that can increase the likelihood of injury outcomes when crashes occur, especially when pedestrians or cyclists are involved.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for Imperial Highway (State Route 90), considering bicyclist and pedestrian activity and proximity to the community center.
○ Install speed feedback signs to help reduce drivers traveling above the posted speed limit.
● Signal Timing. If not currently installed, Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI) signal timing provides pedestrians with a WALK phase (typically 3 to 7 seconds) before the vehicle in that same direction receives a green indication. This can reduce conflicts between turning motor vehicle drivers and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk.
266
262Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 7
4. STONEWOOD DRIVE & HIDDEN HILLS ROAD
Crash Event: 6/17/2021; Cyclists involved; 1 injured; Automobile Right of Way Crash Event: 7/10/2019; Cyclists involved; 1 injured; Automobile Right of Way
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
This intersection is in a residential neighborhood with no direct access to a major arterial road. It is a three-leg intersection that is one-way stop controlled. Stonewood Drive is a short north-south street providing access to the homes in the cul-de-sac. Hidden Hills Road has a posted speed limit of 25 mph, however, the street design (i.e., vertical curvature) could result in high operating speeds. There is a curvature to this intersection which could limit intersection sight distance for all road users along this road. There are no bike lanes and no marked crosswalks at or near this intersection.
There is a “WATCH DOWNHILL SPEED” with a flasher installed about 100 feet east of the intersection for road users driving westbound. There have been two reported crashes in the last five years at this intersection, both involving bicyclists. The downhill grade may contribute to operating speeds of motor vehicle drivers and bicyclists that exceed the posted speed limit. Figure 4 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 4: Stonewood Drive & Hidden Hills Road - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include:
● Speed Management.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for all segments approaching the intersection.
○ Calculate the proper horizontal curve warning sign speed (e.g., through a ball-bank assessment) and ensure warning signs meet the current CAMUTCD standard. 267
263Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 8
Consider signing beyond the minimum standard, due to the history of crashes and the vertical curvature.
○ Install speed feedback signs to help reduce drivers traveling above the posted speed limit.
○ Traffic Calming Treatments. Installing speed management treatments (e.g., a speed bump) at or near the intersection can reduce potential unsafe speeds near the neighborhood, however, further studies must be done to justify the installation. ● Designate Bike Lane. Installing a bike lane will provide cyclists with a designated and safer path to travel.
● Signing & Striping. Installing “WATCH FOR CYCLISTS” or “SHARE THE ROAD” signs could help alert drivers of bicyclist activity at the intersection. Adding shared lane markings (SLMs) or “sharrows” would indicate that the road must be shared between cyclists and vehicles.
5. NORTH KRAEMER BOULEVARD & EAST BASTANCHURY ROAD
Crash Event: 5/29/2021; Cyclists involved; Alcohol involved; 3 cyclists injured; Driving under the influence
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
North Kraemer Boulevard runs north-south; it is also a major arterial for this community and has a speed limit of 40 mph for the north leg and 45 mph for the south leg. East Bastanchury Road runs east-west, serving as a major arterial road connecting various neighborhoods and providing access to Brookhaven Elementary School one block to the east of this intersection; it has a 45 mph speed limit. This is a signalized intersection with all left turns protected. There are yellow high-visibility crosswalks across each intersection and bike lanes along both streets. Hardened medians provide separation between directions and access management at the intersection.
The recent crash reported at this intersection involved a driver under the influence of alcohol who struck a cyclist; three cyclists were injured. Figure 5 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 5: North Kraemer Boulevard & East Bastanchury Road - Aerial 268
264Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 9
The bike facilities on the intersection approaches do not provide continuity. The north leg of North Kraemer Boulevard has a bike lane for southbound travelers, but this bike lane does not continue the south leg. Similarly, the northbound cyclists have a bike lane on the south leg, but the receiving bike lane on the north leg starts about 200 feet north of the intersection. There are no bike lanes on the west leg of West Bastanchury Road, but there is a bike lane for the westbound traffic on the east leg. The bike lane for eastbound cyclists starts approximately 350 feet east of the intersection.
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include the following:
● Speed Management.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for all segments approaching the intersection, factoring in bike facilities and bicyclist and pedestrian activity.
○ Install speed feedback signs to help reduce drivers traveling above the posted speed limit.
● Improved Bike Lanes.
○ Protected Bike Lane. Installing a barrier between the bike lane and the vehicles could provide an extra level of safety for the cyclists. This vertical barrier can vary between a raised curb, flexible posts, or bollards. Rumble strips can also help alert the driver that they are entering the bike lane.
○ Connected Bike Network. Provide bicyclists with a complete and safe bike path to the school from all directions. This could reduce the conflicts between cyclists and motor vehicles by providing a clear path for cyclists.
○ Green Conflicting Striping. Provide bicyclists with bike lane continuity as they approach the intersection and at the intersection itself. Green conflicting striping can help address this.
● Curb Bulb-outs. Consider bulb-outs to reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians and bicyclists.
● Protected Intersection.3 Consider altering the entire intersection design to incorporate new elements, such as setbacks, bike queue areas, waiting zones, pedestrian and corner islands and more safety design elements.
6. DORINDA ROAD & YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD
Crash Event: 1/16/2021; Pedestrian involved; 1 fatality; Pedestrian violation - crossing not in crosswalk
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
Dorinda Road runs north-south; the north side provides access to the residential community, and the south side provides access to the local shopping center at the southwest corner. Yorba Linda
3 https://nacto.org/publication/dont-give-up-at-the-intersection/protected-intersections/ 269
265Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 10
Boulevard runs east-west, serving as a major arterial road connecting the neighborhood and providing access to Travis Ranch Activity School a block to the east of this intersection; it has a 40 mph speed limit. This is a signalized intersection with permissive left turns. There are bike lanes along Yorba Linda Boulevard for both the eastbound and westbound cyclists. There are three yellow standard crosswalks across the north, south, and east legs. The crash reported at this intersection resulted in the death of a pedestrian who was crossing Yorba Linda Boulevard on the west side which does not have a marked crosswalk. Figure 6 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 6: Dorinda Road & Yorba Linda Boulevard - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include the following:
● Pedestrian Crossing. The intersection’s proximity to a middle school increases the likelihood of pedestrians crossing the west leg, as does the information provided in the crash report. Reconfigure the west leg of the intersection to include a marked crosswalk across Yorba Linda Boulevard with appropriate signage and pavement markings. While this will impact signal timing, it will provide pedestrians with a safer designated crossing point. ● Speed Management.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for all segments approaching the intersection, factoring in bike facilities and bicyclist and pedestrian activity.
○ Install speed feedback signs to help reduce drivers traveling above the posted speed limit.
● Signal Timing. If not currently installed, Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI) signal timing provides pedestrians with a WALK phase (typically 3 to 7 seconds) before the vehicle in that same direction receives a green indication. This can reduce conflicts between turning motor vehicle drivers and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk. 270
266Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 11
7. WELSH PONY LANE & RED ROAN LANE
Crash Event: 11/1/2020; Pedestrian involved; Alcohol involved; 1 injured; Improper turning - Pedestrian was crossing in crosswalk at intersection
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
● This intersection is in a residential neighborhood with no direct access to a major arterial road. It is a three-leg intersection that is one-way stop controlled. The horizontal curvature of the road can result in reduced visibility for road users at the intersection. Both streets are cul-de-sacs, with the main entrance to Red Roan Lane coming from the west. There are no bike lanes and no marked crosswalks at the intersection (although the crash report stated the pedestrian was “crossing in crosswalk at intersection”). The crash reported at this location resulted in one injured pedestrian due to the improper turning of a vehicle while the pedestrian was crossing the intersection. Alcohol was also reported to be a factor in this crash. Figure 7 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 7: Welsh Pony Lane & Red Roan Lane - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include the following:
● Pedestrian Crossing. Installing a marked crosswalk and associated warning signs across Welsh Pony Lane would provide pedestrians with a designated crossing point at the intersection.
● Intersection Traffic Control Evaluation. It may be beneficial to reevaluate intersection warrants for all-way stop control, signalization, or a neighborhood traffic calming circle; additional studies must be performed to justify any installations. This would provide clear right-of-way rules and potentially reduce vehicle speeds, improving overall safety. ● Signing & Striping. Installing “WATCH FOR CYCLISTS” or “SHARE THE ROAD” signs could help alert drivers of bicyclist activity at the intersection. Adding shared lane markings (SLMs) or “sharrows” would indicate that the road must be shared between cyclists and vehicles.
271
267Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 12
8. VAN BUREN STREET & YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD
Crash Event: 9/2/2020; Cyclists involved; Alcohol involved; 1 injured; Unsafe speed
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
Van Buren Street runs north-south, with the north leg being a residential area and the south providing direct access to Van Buren Elementary School. Yorba Linda Boulevard runs east-west and is a major arterial road that connects the local businesses around the area and has a speed limit of 45 mph. This intersection is controlled by a traffic signal and has standard white crosswalks. There are no bike lanes along either of these streets. The crash occurred west of the intersection and is reported to have had alcohol as a contributing factor. The driver was traveling at an unsafe speed (per the officer’s report), striking and seriously injuring a cyclist. Given there is no existing bike lane, cyclists are traveling alongside motor vehicles in the general-purpose lanes. The west leg of this intersection is narrower than the east leg and the three through lanes drop down to two lanes after crossing the intersection going westbound. Figure 8 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 8: Van Buren Street & Yorba Linda Boulevard - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
To address the potential needs identified at the intersection and understanding the limitations of the roadway geometry, the following treatments could be considered. ● Speed Management.
○ Evaluate operating speeds to determine the most appropriate posted speed limit for all segments approaching the intersection.
○ Install speed feedback signs to help reduce drivers traveling above the posted speed limit.
● Signing & Striping. Installing “WATCH FOR CYCLISTS” or “SHARE THE ROAD” signs could help alert drivers of bicyclist activity at the intersection. Adding shared lane markings 272
268Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 13
(SLMs) or “sharrows” would indicate that the road must be shared between cyclists and vehicles.
9. SOUTH MELROSE STREET & WEST LA JOLLA STREET
Crash Event: 5/7/2020; Cyclists involved; 1 injured; Improper turning
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
South Melrose Street & West La Jolla Street is an intersection that provides direct access to Melrose Elementary School on the northeast corner. This intersection has yellow high-visibility crosswalks and bike lanes on both sides of South Melrose Street, but only south of La Jolla Street. The intersection is controlled by a traffic signal, and it has all protected left turns. The eastbound traffic is limited by a no right-turn on red sign, which can help minimize the potential conflict of vehicles with pedestrians and cyclists crossing the crosswalk. The crash involving a bicyclist that occurred near this intersection occurred just south of the intersection. It was reported as a broadside incident with improper turning by the motor vehicle driver. Only one leg of the intersection has existing bike lanes, but students are presumably approaching from all directions. Figure 9 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 9: South Melrose Street & West La Jolla Street - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
Potential treatments include the following:
● Signing. Installing no right-turn on red signs for all approaches can help minimize any potential conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians/cyclists crossing the intersection. This may also help discourage drivers from entering the bike lane or crosswalk prematurely if the driver will ultimately still have to wait for the green light to be able to make the turn. ● Signal Timing. If not currently installed, Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI) signal timing provides pedestrians with a WALK phase (typically 3 to 7 seconds) before the vehicle in that 273
269Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 14
same direction receives a green indication. This can reduce conflicts between turning motor vehicle drivers and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk. ● Improved Bike Lane.
○ Protected Bike Lane. Installing a barrier between the bike lane and the vehicles could provide an extra level of protection for cyclists. This vertical barrier can vary between a raised curb, flexible posts, or bollards. Rumble strips can also help alert the driver that they are entering the bike lane.
○ Connected Bike Network. It is important to provide riders with a complete and safe bike path to the school from all directions.
10. CASA ORO DRIVE & CASA HERMOSA DRIVE
Crash Event: 12/26/2019; Pedestrian involved; 1 fatality; Driving under the influence; Pedestrian was in the road
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
Casa Oro Drive runs north-south and leads to an arterial road, El Cajon Avenue. This intersection is in a residential neighborhood with no posted speed limits. Casa Hermosa Drive runs east-west and is a small street leading to a cul-de-sac with Casa Oro Drive being its only access point. There are no marked crosswalks. Cul-de-sacs tend to have higher than normal pedestrian and bicycle activity because of the sense of safety the community gets from them. The crash occurred to the north of this intersection towards the end of the cul-de-sac, with one fatality. The driver was noted to be under the influence and the pedestrian involved was in the road; this happened during the day.
Figure 10 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 10: Casa Oro Drive & Casa Hermosa Drive - Aerial
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
There are no apparent needs at the intersection. Although this is a tragic incident, the intersection function and design do not seem to have been a factor in this crash. The volumes and speeds are 274
270Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 15
normally low in residential areas and the pedestrian and bike activity are usually higher than a through street. There are a few potential treatments for consideration. ● Signing. Installing appropriate signage would warn drivers that Casa Hermosa Drive is not a through street. There is a “NO OUTLET” sign, south of the intersection, at El Cajon Avenue and Casa Oro Drive. There could be an additional “DEAD END” sign at the intersection of the incident to steer away any infrequent drivers from the neighborhood. An alternative would be installing a warning sign, such as, “WATCH FOR PEDESTRIANS & CYCLISTS” could help alert drivers to the higher-than-normal pedestrian and bicyclist activity. ● Traffic Calming Treatments. Installing speed management treatments (e.g., a speed bump) in the area can reduce potential unsafe speeds near the neighborhood, however, further studies must be done to justify the installation. Coordination with emergency and incident response agencies must be done for speed management treatments.
11. NORTH COMMUNITY DRIVE & ORANGETHORPE AVENUE
Crash Event: 1/5/2018; Pedestrian involved; 1 injured; Pedestrian Violation- Crossing not in crosswalk
EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONCERNS
North Community Drive intersects Orangethorpe Avenue running north-south; the north side is the entrance to a senior living community and the south side is a driveway into a parking lot for the local business. This is a two-way stop-controlled intersection, and there are no crosswalks.
Orangethorpe Avenue runs east-west, serving as a major arterial road connecting various neighborhoods and commercial areas in the region with a 45 mph speed limit. There are bike lanes running along Orangethorpe Avenue. The north side of Orangethorpe Avenue has sidewalks connecting to the nearest traffic signal intersections; however, this is not true for the southside. A bus stop at the northwest corner of the intersection has a bench and a trash can. There is also a bus stop on the southeast corner of the intersection, but this has no additional accommodations nor access to a marked crosswalk to cross Orangethorpe Avenue. The crash reported at this intersection involved a pedestrian crossing Orangethorpe Avenue and being struck by a motor vehicle. Figure 11 shows an aerial view of the intersection.
FIGURE 11: North Community Drive & Orangethorpe Avenue - Aerial 275
271Active Transportation Plan Appendices
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 16
This intersection appears to lack features for convenient pedestrian travel in the area. The absence of sidewalks along the south side of Orangethorpe Avenue may result in pedestrians walking on uneven landscaping or along the bike lane along the 45 mph speed limit arterial. Crossing Orangethorpe Avenue spans more than 100 feet at this location without dedicated pedestrian crossings. The bus stop located on the southeast corner lacks connectivity to sidewalks or crosswalks, requiring commuters to disembark and potentially navigate traffic to reach their destination. This issue is particularly important for the senior community on the north side of the intersection. These residents, who may often walk to destinations (and may use assistive devices), require high visibility and safe crossing options to access essential services and amenities.
POTENTIAL LOCATION-SPECIFIC COUNTERMEASURES
To address the potential needs identified at the intersection of Orangethorpe Avenue & North Community Drive, several safety countermeasures should be considered. ● Pedestrian Crossing. Installing a marked crosswalk across Orangethorpe Avenue with appropriate signage and pavement markings would provide pedestrians with a designated crossing point.
○ Pedestrian Refuge. Additionally, incorporating a pedestrian refuge island in the middle of the intersection could reduce crossing distance, allowing pedestrians to cross one direction of traffic at a time. This will need to be balanced with left-turning vehicle needs.
○ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon. To improve pedestrian visibility and crossing safety, installing a Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) at the crosswalk would alert drivers to the presence of pedestrians and encourage them to yield. ● Intersection Traffic Control Evaluation. Given the current traffic dynamics, it may be beneficial to reevaluate the intersection's signalization criteria. While the intersection might not currently meet the warrants for a full signal or a 4-way stop due to low traffic volume on North Community Drive, reassessing the traffic patterns and pedestrian volumes could justify consideration of other traffic control options. This would provide clear right-of-way rules and potentially reduce vehicle speeds, improving overall safety. ● Transit Access. Addressing the bus stop on the southeast corner is crucial. Moving it closer to a signalized intersection or providing a designated crosswalk connection would ensure safer access for bus riders, reducing the need for them to navigate across Orangethorpe Avenue in unsafe conditions.
SYSTEMIC TREATMENTS TO CONSIDER
Although the 11 KSI locations represent isolated incidents, they are indicative of a broader systemic issue within Yorba Linda and Placentia’s transportation network. After analyzing the sites, the team noticed similarities in the recommendations. The following treatments should be considered for both cities, where feasible.
● Marked Crosswalks. Provide pedestrians a clearly marked path for them to safely cross intersections that are too wide, provide direct access to destinations of interest and transit stops, and provide a safer environment on roadways with higher speeds. 276
272Appendices Yorba Linda-Placentia
YORBA LINDA ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROJECT • KSI CRASH LOCATION ASSESSMENT • AUGUST 27, 2024 17
○ Pedestrian Facility Visibility Improvements. High visibility crosswalk markings and additional signing can increase drivers’ awareness of pedestrian and bicyclist activity.
● Traffic Control. It may be beneficial to reevaluate the intersection's traffic control through signal and all-way stop warrant analysis. Reassessing the traffic patterns and pedestrian volumes could justify other traffic control options, such as small neighborhood traffic calming circles.
● Curb Bulb-outs. Consider bulb-outs to reduce the crossing distance for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as reduce the turning radius.
● Signal Timing. If not currently installed, Lead Pedestrian Interval (LPI) signal timing provides pedestrians with a WALK phase (typically 3 to 7 seconds) before the vehicle in that same direction receives a green indication. This can reduce conflicts between turning motor vehicle drivers and pedestrians or bicyclists in the crosswalk. ● Speed Management. Reassessing posted speed limits that consider roadway conditions and active transportation activities can improve safety. Adding traffic calming devices (e.g., speed bumps, curb bulb-outs, etc.) can further reduce operating speeds, however, further studies must be done to justify the installation.
○ Horizontal Curve Signing. While less common in urban and residential areas, horizontal curve warning signs provide drivers information to safely navigate roadway conditions. These low-cost treatments can provide speed reduction and safety benefits.
● Bike Lanes. Providing riders with a complete and safe bike path network within Yorba Linda and Placentia, especially near schools, should be considered. Installing protected bike lanes can ensure an extra level of caution and protection. A vertical barrier between the bike lane and the vehicles can vary; a raised curb, flexible posts, or bollards are all examples of what can be used. Rumble strips can also help alert the driver that they are entering the bike lane.
● Impaired Driving Campaigns: Education and Enforcement. Over half of the fatal and serious injury crashes studied at these locations (6 of 11 crash events at these locations) involved one or more impaired road users. Consider working with health advocates, local law enforcement and state agencies, and local businesses such as bars and restaurants to promote sober road use through established or new educational or enforcement activities.
CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS
Yorba Linda and Placentia should review this initial desk exercise and confirm real-world conditions for any findings and potential treatments.
Beyond these 11 intersections, Yorba Linda and Placentia should consider the overall themes discussed in this memo and consider treatments (especially low-cost, systemic treatments) at locations exhibiting similar roadway conditions and traffic patterns (for all road users), regardless of past crash history.
277
273Active Transportation Plan Appendices
THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK
278
279
1 Placentia City Council
Meeting
January 14, 2025
280
2 Project Overview
281
3 Overview
• The neighboring cities of Yorba Linda and Placentia along with the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District (PYLUSD) have partnered to develop a comprehensive Active Transportation Plan (ATP)
• The ATP incorporated:
• Needed pedestrian and bicycle improvements
• Safe Routes to School (SRTS) improvements
• Updated Master Plan of Trails (including equestrian trails) • The bi-city ATP is needed to add and to connect infrastructure for safer, more accessible walking and biking for school children, families, residents, and visitors
282
4 Project Schedule
Schedule subject to change
Winter
2024/2025
Winter 2023-
Spring 2024
283
5 Plan Goals
284
6 Active Transportation Plan Components
• Existing Conditions
• Previous Plan Review
• Needs Analysis
• Public Engagement
• Recommendations
• Bicycle
• Pedestrian
• Safe Routes to School
• Recommendation Prioritization
• Non-Infrastructure Programming
285
7 Existing Conditions
286
8 Needs Analysis
287
9 Review of Completed
Engagement
288
10 Phase I Outreach Events
• Project Website
• Online Feedback Map
• 200 Comments
• 2 Pop-Ups
• 2 Workshops
• 1 Virtual Town Hall
• 1 PTA Council Meeting
• 28 School Walk Audits
289
11 Phase II Outreach Events
• Pop-up Events
• Yorba Linda Community Center- 10/8
• Yorba Linda Rotary Club Meeting- 10/18
• Yorba Linda Library/Cultural Arts Center – 10/21
• Yorba Linda Country Riders- 10/30
• Placentia Old Town Concert- 10/10
• Placentia Heritage Festival-10/19
• Placentia Library-10/25
• Online Public Review Draft
• Virtual Workshop
290
12 Pedestrian and Bicycle
Recommendations
291
292
293
294
16 Safe Routes to Schools
Recommendations
295
Safe Routes to School
296
297
19 Improvement
Concept Schematics
298
299
300
301
302
24 E-Bikes
• The ATP recognizes the
increased prevalence of e-
bikes in the City
• Placentia will continue to
monitor e-bike policies as
appropriate.
303
25 Staff Recommendation
304
26 Staff Recommendation
Approve Resolution R-2025-03 - approve
and adopt the Yorba Linda and Placentia
Joint Active Transportation Plan (sections
pertaining to Placentia)
305
27 Q&A Session
306
28 Project Website Information
• Project Website
•virtualeventroom.com/yorba-linda-placentia-atp/
307
29 Thank You!
308