Placentia City Council
February 4, 2025

Robert S. McKinnell
City Clerk
Kevin A. Larson
City Treasurer
Jennifer Lampman
City Administrator
Christian L. Bettenhausen
City Attorney
Placentia City Council
Placentia City Council as Successor to the
Placentia Redevelopment Agency
Placentia Industrial Commercial
Development Authority
Placentia Public Financing Authority
AGENDA
February 4, 2025
Council Chambers
401 E Chapman Ave.

Placentia, CA 92870
Phone: (714) 993-8117
Email: [email protected]
www.placentia.org

KEVIN KIRWIN
Mayor
District 2
CHAD P. WANKE
Mayor Pro Tem
District 4

THOMAS HUMMER
Councilmember
District 1
WARD L. SMITH
Councilmember
District 5
JEREMY B. YAMAGUCHI
Councilmember
District 3

Mission Statement
The City Council is committed to keeping Placentia a pleasant place by providing a safe family atmosphere, superior public services and policies that promote the highest standards of community life.

Vision Statement
The City of Placentia will maintain an open, honest, responsive and innovative government that delivers quality services in a fair and equitable manner while optimizing available resources.

Copies of all agenda materials are available for public review in the Office of the City Clerk, online at www.placentia.org , and at Placentia Library Reference Desk. Persons who have questions concerning any agenda item may call the City Clerk's Office, (714) 993-8231, to make inquiry concerning the nature of the item described on the agenda.

Procedures for Addressing the Council/Board Members
Any person who wishes to speak regarding an item on the agenda or on a subject within the City's jurisdiction during the "Oral Communications" portion of the agenda should fill out a "Speaker Request Form" and give it to the City Clerk BEFORE that portion of the agenda is called. Testimony for Public Hearings will only be taken at the time of the hearing. Any person who wishes to speak on a Public Hearing item should fill out a "Speaker Request Form" and give it to the City Clerk BEFORE the item is called.

The Council and Board members encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons the opportunity to speak, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of an entire group. To encourage all views, the Council and Board discourage clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.

PLEASE SILENCE ALL PAGERS, CELL PHONES, AND OTHER ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT WHILE COUNCIL AND BOARD MEMBERS ARE IN SESSION.

Special Accommodations
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (714) 993-8231. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will generally enable City staff to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II) In compliance with California Government Code § 54957.5, any writings or documents provided to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda that are not exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk's Office at City Hall, 401 East Chapman Avenue, Placentia, during normal business hours.

Study Sessions are open to the public and held in the City Council Chambers or City Hall Community Room. Closed Sessions are held in the Council Caucus Room. While the public may be in attendance during oral announcements preceding Closed Sessions, Closed Sessions are not open to the public.

1 PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA - CLOSED SESSION February 4, 2025
5:00 p.m. - City Council Chambers
401 E. Chapman Avenue, Placentia, CA
CALL TO ORDER:

ROLL CALL:

Councilmember/Board Member Hummer
Councilmember/Board Member Smith
Councilmember/Board Member Yamaguchi
Mayor Pro Tem/Board Vice Chair Wanke
Mayor/Board Chair Kirwin
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

At this time the public may address the City Council and Boards of Directors concerning any items on the Closed Session Agenda only. There is a five (5) minute time limit for each individual addressing the City Council and Boards of Directors. The City Council and Boards of Directors will recess to the City Council Caucus Room for the purpose of conducting their Closed Session proceedings.

CLOSED SESSION PROCEEDINGS:

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Agency Designated Representatives: Thomas Hatch, Interim City Administrator Alice Burnett, Director of Human Resources
Employee Organizations: Placentia City Employees Assocation (PCEA) Placentia Firefighters Association (PFA)
Placentia Police and Fire Management Association
(PPFMA)
Placentia Police Officers Association (PPOA)
Unrepresented Employees

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – Anticipated Litigation
(1 case)

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1):

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Interim City Administrator

RECESS: The City Council and Boards of Directors will recess to their 7:00 p.m.

Regular Meeting.
2 1.CONSENT CALENDAR (1.a to 1.f):

1.a Consideration to Waive Reading in Full of all Ordinances and Resolutions

1.b City Fiscal Year 2024-25 Registers for February 4, 2025 Check Register
Fiscal Impact: $ 1,485,205.11
Electronic Disbursement Register
Fiscal Impact: $ 3,850,687.84

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
February 4, 2025
7:00 p.m. - City Council Chambers
401 E. Chapman Avenue, Placentia, CA
CALL TO ORDER:

ROLL CALL:

Councilmember/Board Member Hummer
Councilmember/Board Member Smith
Councilmember/Board Member Yamaguchi
Mayor Pro Tem/Board Vice Chair Wanke
Mayor/Board Chair Kirwin
INVOCATION: Chaplain Kenneth Curry
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:

PRESENTATIONS: None
CLOSED SESSION REPORT:

CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT:

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

At this time the public may address the City Council and Boards of Directors concerning any agenda item, which is not a public hearing item, or on matters within the jurisdiction of the City Council and Boards of Directors. There is a five (5) minute time limit for each individual addressing the City Council and Boards of Directors.

CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS:

All items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and are enacted by one motion approving the recommended action listed on the Agenda. Any Member of the City Council and Boards of Directors or City Administrator may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion. All items removed shall be considered immediately following action on the remaining items.

Fiscal Impact: None

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve.
3 1.c Minutes
City Council/Successor/ICDA/PPFA Special Meetings of:

October 3, 2024
October 28, 2024

1.d Approval to Replace Existing Door Access Control System for City Hall, Police Department and Fire Administration Buildings

1.e Cooperative Agreement for the Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project

1.f Resolution appointing retired annuitant Daylene Alliman as a temporary Human Resources Analyst to perform work of a limited duration under Government Code Sections 75522.56 and 21224

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

Receive and file.

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve.

Fiscal Impact:

Expense: $163,971.49 Total Project Amount
$146,337.72 Equipment Purchase and Labor Total
$ 17,633.77 Project Contingency Amount
Budget: $185,000.00 FY 2024-25 CIP Budget (796509-6840)

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Authorize the replacement of the existing Stanley PAC door access control system to cloud based, Open Path Access Control system; and

2. Approve the selection of ASSI Security, the City's current provider of the same cloud-based system being installed at the new Public Safety Building, to supply and install the new access control system; and

3. Approve a contingency budget of 10% of the total project cost to cover unforeseen change requests and expenses; and

4. Authorize the Interim City Administrator and/or her designee to execute all necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Fiscal Impact:

Expense: $191,950.00 City's Share of Project Cost
Budget: $191,950.00 To be included in the FY 25-26 CIP Budget

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve Cooperative Agreement for the Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue Project Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program between the Cities of Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange; and

2. Authorize the Interim City Administrator and/or his designee to execute the necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

4 2.PUBLIC HEARING:

2.a An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California amending Chapter 10.56 “Graffiti” of Title 10 “Peace, Morals and Safety” of the Placentia Municipal Code relating to the prevention, enforcement, and abatement of graffiti, and recovering costs related thereto

3.REGULAR AGENDA:

3.a Appointments to the Centennial Steering Committee for the City's upcoming Centennial in 2026
Fiscal Impact:

The Human Resources Analyst is a regularly allocated position within the City's budget. The costs associated with a temporary Human Resources Analyst can be covered in the current year's FY 2024-25 budget.

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council:

It is recommended that the City Council Adopt Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California Certifying the Human Resources Analyst Classification as a critically needed position and appointing Daylene Alliman as a temporary Human Resources Analyst Pursuant to Government Code Sections 75522.56 and 21224

Fiscal Impact:

No immediate impact. Potential for increased revenue.

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing concerning Ordinance No. O-2025-01, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California amending Sections

10.56.010, 10.56.020, 10.56.060, and 10.56.070 (Chapter 10.56 “Graffiti” of Title 10 “Peace, Morals and Safety”) relating to the prevention, enforcement, and abatement of graffiti, and recovering costs related thereto; and

2. Receive the Staff Report and consider all Public Testimony; and

3. Close the Public Hearing; and

4. Waive full reading, by title only, and introduce and adopt Ordinance No. O- 2025-01, amending PMC Title 10 related to graffiti abatement.

Fiscal Impact:

At this time there is no fiscal impact associated with the creation of the Committee.

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:

1. Formally appoint one (1) City Council Member to serve on the Centennial Steering Committee; and

2. Approve the appointment of City Council Member and Placentia Rotary Member Ward Smith to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the City Council and the Rotary Club of Placentia; and

3. Approve the appointment of Historical Committee Members Bonnie Carren and Kathy Frazee to the Centennial Steering Committee per the recommendation of 5 the Historical Committee; and

4. Approve the appointment of Park, Arts, and Recreation Commissioner Tricia Montelongo to the Centennial Steering Committee per the recommendation of the Park, Arts, and Recreation Committee; and

5. Approve the appointment of Placentia Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Michele Severson to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Placentia Chamber of Commerce; and

6. Approve the appointment of Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association President Rosalina Davis to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association; and

7. Approve the appointment of Heritage Committee Member Kenny Binnings to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Heritage Committee; and

8. Approve the appointment of Placentia Library District Assistant Director Yesenia Baltierra to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Placentia Library District; and

9. Approve the appointment of Kiwanis Club President James Kissinger to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Kiwanis Club of Placentia; and

10. Approve the appointment of Art Castillo to the Centennial Steering Committee in representation of Council District 2 per the recommendation of Mayor Kirwin (District 2).

CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS REQUESTS:

Council Members may make requests or ask questions of Staff. If a Council Member would like to have formal action taken on a requested matter, it will be placed on a future Council or Board Agenda.

ADJOURNMENT
The City Council/Successor Agency/ICDA/PPFA Board of Directors will adjourn to a regular City Council meeting on Tuesday, February 18, 2025 at 5:30 p.m.

TENTATIVE AGENDA FORECAST:

Mid-Year Budget Review
CIP Study Session
Unclaimed Checks

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I, Nancy Albitre-Seely, Interim Deputy City Clerk for the City of Placentia and Assistant Secretary of the Industrial Commercial Development Authority, the Successor Agency, and the Placentia Financing Authority hereby certify that the Agenda for the February 4, 2025, meetings of the City Council, Successor Agency, and Industrial Commercial Development Authority, and the Placentia Public Financing Authority was posted on January 30, 2025.

______________________________________________________
Nancy Albitre-Seely, Interim Deputy City Clerk
6 PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Nancy Albitre-Seely
From: City Attorney's Office
Subject:

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR
Agency Designated Representatives: Thomas Hatch, Interim City Administrator Alice Burnett, Director of Human Resources
Employee Organizations: Placentia City Employees Assocation (PCEA) Placentia Firefighters Association (PFA)
Placentia Police and Fire Management Association
(PPFMA)
Placentia Police Officers Association (PPOA)
Unrepresented Employees

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – Anticipated Litigation
(1 case)

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1):

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Title: Interim City Administrator

Recommendation:

7 Agenda Item No: 1.a

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Nancy Albitre-Seely
From: City Clerk
Subject:

Consideration to Waive Reading in Full of all Ordinances and Resolutions Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact: None
Recommendation:

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve.
8 Agenda Item No: 1.b

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Gabriela Calin
From: Finance
Subject:

City Fiscal Year 2024-25 Registers for February 4, 2025 Check Register
Fiscal Impact: $ 1,485,205.11
Electronic Disbursement Register
Fiscal Impact: $ 3,850,687.84
Recommendation:

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

Receive and file.

Attachments
Check Register 02.04.2025.pdf
ACH Check Register 02.04.2025.pdf
9 10

11 12

13 14

15 16

17 18

19 20

21 22

23 24

25 26

27 28

29 30

31 32

33 34

35 36

37 38

39 40

41 42

43 44

45 46

47 48

49 50

51 52

53 54

55 56

57 58

59 60

61 62

63 64

Agenda Item No: 1.c

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Carole Wayman
From: City Clerk
Subject:

Minutes
City Council/Successor/ICDA/PPFA Special Meetings of:

October 3, 2024
October 28, 2024
Recommendation:

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

Approve.

Attachments
10-3-2024 CC Special Meeting Minutes.docx
10-28-2024 CC Special Meeting Minutes.docx
65 Placentia City Council Special Meeting Minutes, October 3, 2024 Page 1 of 1

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

PLACENTIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

PLACENTIA INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

PLACENTIA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING
October 3, 2024
8:00 a.m. – City Council Chambers
401 E. Chapman Avenue, Placentia, CA
AND
Teleconference location:
1393 McKenzie Drive
Placentia, CA
CALL TO ORDER:Mayor Yamaguchi called the meeting to order at 8:00 a.m.

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Shader, Smith, Kirwin, Yamaguchi
REMOTE:Wanke
ABSENT:None
STAFF PRESENT: City Clerk Robert McKinnell, City Attorney/Authority Counsel Christian Bettenhausen, Deputy City Clerk Carole Wayman
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:None
CLOSED SESSION:

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/DISMISSAL/RELEASE
CLOSED SESSION REPORT:

City Attorney/Authority Counsel Christian Bettenhausen stated that discussion was held on the Closed Session item and direction was given, and there was nothing further to report.

CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: None
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS REQUESTS: None
ADJOURNMENT:

The City Council adjourned at 9:25 a.m. to a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, October 15, 2024 at 5:30 p.m.
__________________________________
Jeremy B. Yamaguchi, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
66 Placentia City Council Special Meeting Minutes, October 28, 2024 Page 1 of 1

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL ACTING AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE

PLACENTIA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

PLACENTIA INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

PLACENTIA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING
October 28, 2024
3:00 p.m. – City Council Chambers
401 E. Chapman Avenue, Placentia, CA
AND
Teleconference location:
336 Delores Circle
Placentia, CA 92870
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Yamaguchi called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

PRESENT: Smith, Wanke, Kirwin, Yamaguchi
REMOTE:Shader
ABSENT:None
STAFF PRESENT: City Clerk Robert McKinnell, City Attorney/Authority Counsel Christian Bettenhausen, Deputy City Administrator Rosanna Ramirez, Deputy City Clerk Carole Wayman ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:

Julie Suchard, Placentia resident, expressed concerns about City Administrator Arrula’s high compensation and expenses for an electric vehicle charger, car washes and meals. She also expressed concerns about expenses for a farewell party for Councilmember Shader.

Terry Rains commented on a past corruption case in the City and expressed concerns about City Administrator Arrula’s high compensation and the police and fire unions no-confidence vote in Mr. Arrula. She requested that the City Attorney report the roll call vote tally.

Craig Green, Placentia resident, commended the City Council for maintaining confidentiality regarding the investigation into City Administrator Arrula and expressed concerns about the negative comments and speculation surrounding the investigation. He expressed support for Mr.

Arrula and commented on his contributions to the City. He recommended administrative action rather than termination. (Submitted written comments)
Scott King, Placentia resident, expressed frustration over the lack of progress in improving the City’s streets. He expressed concerns about City Administrator Arrula’s fiscal responsibility to taxpayers and called for his removal. He added concerns about the expense for a farewell party for Councilmember Shader.

Jim Weiner expressed concerns about City Administrator Arrula’s fiscal actions and concurred with comments by previous speaker Scott King. He offered his financial expertise to review the city’s budget and improve spending protocols. He called for a thorough review of City expenses and the need for clear procedures.
67 Placentia City Council Special Meeting Minutes, October 28, 2024 Page 2 of 1 CLOSED SESSION:

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE/DISMISSAL/RELEASE
CLOSED SESSION REPORT:

City Attorney/Authority Counsel Christian Bettenhausen stated that discussion was held on the Closed Session item and direction was given, and there was nothing further to report.

CITY COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS: None
ADJOURNMENT:

The City Council adjourned at 4:36 p.m. to a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 at 5:30 p.m.
__________________________________
Jeremy B. Yamaguchi, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk/
Agency Secretary
68 Agenda Item No: 1.d

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Daniel Chang
From: Administrative Services
Subject:

Approval to Replace Existing Door Access Control System for City Hall, Police Department and Fire Administration Buildings
Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact:

Expense: $163,971.49 Total Project Amount
$146,337.72 Equipment Purchase and Labor Total
$ 17,633.77 Project Contingency Amount
Budget: $185,000.00 FY 2024-25 CIP Budget (796509-6840) Summary:

The Fiscal Year (FY) 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget includes funding for IT Emergency Repair projects (Server HVAC & Key Reader System). The scope of this project includes the replacement of the Stanley PAC Key Fob Door Access Control Systems for City Hall, Police Department and Fire Administration (Old City Hall).

The City's current door access system, a Stanley PAC system, has been in service for over 15 years. The system has become increasingly unreliable and obsolete due to the age, lack of available parts and the absence of vendor support. These limitations have led to higher maintenance costs and present security vulnerabilities that require immediate attention.

The City has an existing relationship with ASSI Security, who has installed and setup our security camera systems for the Police Department, City Hall and the new Public Safety Building. Additionally, all equipment and services will be procured using the California Multiple Awards Schedules (CMAS) program, in alignment with the City's internal purchasing policy. (CMAS Number: 3-21-08-1064 - Exp. 09/03/2025).

Recommendation:

Recommended Action: It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Authorize the replacement of the existing Stanley PAC door access control system to cloud based, Open Path Access Control system; and

2. Approve the selection of ASSI Security, the City's current provider of the same cloud- based system being installed at the new Public Safety Building, to supply and install the new access control system; and

3. Approve a contingency budget of 10% of the total project cost to cover unforeseen 69 change requests and expenses; and

4. Authorize the Interim City Administrator and/or her designee to execute all necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Strategic Plan Statement:

There is no specific strategic planning goal or objective associated with this agenda item.

Discussion:

The scope of this project includes the replacement of the Stanley PAC Key Fob Door Access Control Systems for City Hall, Police Department and Fire Administration (Old City Hall).

The outdated Stanley PAC system no longer meets the City's access control and security needs. The new replacement cloud-based system, Open Patch Access Control system, will provide Enhanced Security with advanced encryption and pair with multi-factor credentials, system reliability with ease of maintenance, integration and scalability as the system can be expanded to other City facilities.

In July 2024, the three back entrance doors (including the Pedestrian Gate) in the Police Department, lost connection to the Door Access Readers as the back door access control system panel had stop functioning, causing the entrances to be unlocked and not secured.

With an emergency approval, ASSI Security provided a temporary solution to replace the inoperable Stanley PAC control panel with the same Access Control hardware that is being proposed in this project. The same hardware and wiring will be used as part of the replacement.

Staff recommends proceeding with ASSI Security, who has proposed a solution meeting all of these requirements. Also, with their familiarity of the City's systems and utilizing the CMAS contract ensures competitive pricing and compliance with purchasing policies. To account for unforeseen expenses during implementation, a 10% contingency budget is also recommended.

Fiscal Impact Summary:

The total project cost for this replacement amounts to $163,971.49. The cost includes the total amount of $146,337.72 as well as a contingency in the amount of $17,633.72. A total of $185,000 was budgeted in the FY 2024-25 CIP budget for this project. As such, sufficient funds exist for the recommended actions.

Attachments
CIty of Placentia Quote - City Hall, PD, Fire Hqtrs Replace Access Control System with Mercury Boards #13076-1-0-2.pdf
70 Proposal: 13076-1-0-2
Prepared For:

David Radomski
City of Placentia
(714) 993-8192
City of Placentia
Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall,
Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
71 2Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614

PROJECT DESCRIPTION & INVESTMENT
Client Information
Site:

City of Placentia
City Hall 401 E Chapman, PD 401 E
Chapman, Fire Hd
Placentia, CA
Contact:

David Radomski
(714) 993-8192
[email protected]
Scope of Work
CMAS NUMBER: 3-21-08-1064 - exp. 09/03/25
BASE SCHEDULE: GS-07F-225CA
ASSI Security will provide and install the equipment per the plans, job walk and input from both City and PD Department personnel. An attached drawing shows location of equipment based on the information gathered.

The existing Stanley System will be replaced with the City's new security standard Open Path Access Control cloud based system. The readers will be replaced with the Signo HID mobile enabled readers to allow the city to use either a physical card or mobile credential to gain entry in to the building. Additionally, a request to exit device (REX) and door contact will be installed at each card reader location (unless noted otherwise). The door contact will provide door status on all card reader door locations, if the door is propped or forced open an alarm will be generated and sent to the system. The REX will allow free egress from the secure side of the door by shunting the door contact so that no alarm will be generated.

ASSI Security will install new cable for the all devices.

Fire Department Life and Safety Headquarters:
·(1) Life Safety Controller
o installed in Fire Dept IDF Room
·(3) Card Reader
·(3) Request-to-Exit Devices
·(3) Door Contacts
·Lot - new cable
o Note: cable to be confirmed, if cable is sufficient to support the (3) readers a credit will be issued for the cable for this Department
City Hall:
·(1) Life Safety Controllers
o installed in CIty Hall IDF Room
·(15) Card Reader
·(15) Request-to-Exit Devices
·(15) Door Contacts
·Lot - new cable

Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
72 3Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 Police Department:
·(2) Life Safety Controllers
o installed in City Hall IDF Room
·(13) Card Readers
·(8) Card Reader/Keypad Reader
o In/Out Booking Entrance location (no REX required)
o In/Out Sally Port Door 41 location (no REX required)
o In/Out Sally Port Door 43 location (no REX required)
·(21) Request-to-Exit Devices
·(21) Door Contacts
·(2) Electrified Door Hardware
o Door #24 - relocating existing electrified hardware
o Lt's Office - new electrified door hardware
·Lot - new cable
·Program existing door release buttons for doors # 27- 28 and 33 - 37 into Access Control System Note: There are (24) doors in the PD area, but (3) card readers were installed with the Temporary System and will be reused.

The Life Safety Power enclosure will be installed in the IDF room in City Hall and be equipped with power supplies, the controller boards, power distribution modules and batteries.

All devices will be programmed and tested with customer for commissioning of the project.

Credit:

This credits the temporary DSX equipment that was installed as an emergency measure when the PD system failed. This equipment will be removed and will become the property of ASSI Security . The equipment to be removed is: (1) Control Panel, P.S. and batteries.

Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
73 4Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 Project Investment
$8,141.41 Annual Recurring Charges
QTY Ext. PriceUnit PriceDescription Part #Manufacturer $4,056.34$4,056.34Enterprise: Pack of 25 entriesSW-ETP-P25Openpath. 1.00 $2,028.17$2,028.17Enterprise: Pack of 10 entriesSW-ETP-P10Openpath. 1.00 $1,216.90$1,216.90Enterprise: Pack of 5 entriesSW-ETP-P5Openpath. 1.00 $840.00$420.00Enterprise: Pack of 1 entrySW-ETP-P1Openpath. 2.00 $11,238.70 Fire Life and Safety Headquarters
QTY Ext. PriceUnit PriceDescription Part #Manufacturer $415.00$415.00Access Control Core board with support for up to 2 expansion boards via USB. The core can be wirelessly configured with the Admin app and can be powered by 12V or 24V
OP-CR-ACCOpenpath. 1.00
$640.00$640.00Four Door Mercury Dual Voltage Integrated Power System supporting one AC-MER-CONT-2DR with one AC-MER-CON–
MR52 (Mercury hardware sold separately). The
AC-LSP-4DR-MER-LCKAVIGILON- 1.00
$1,480.00$1,480.00Intelligent Controller; Linux Based with 2 doors; 8 inputs and 4 outputs; expandable up to 64 doors. (Mercury Part #: LP1502) AC-MER-CONT-LP1502AVIGILON- 1.00
$815.00$815.00HID® Mercury™ MR52-S3B Controller Serial I/O Dual Card Reader Interface; 2-Reader Interface Module - (2 reader: mag; wiegand; 4 reader OSDP; 8 inputs;
AC-MER-CON-MR52-S3BAVIGILON- 1.00
$855.00$285.00HID, Signo 40 Wall Mount, 13.56mHz Profile, OSDP/Wiegand, Mobile Ready, BLE
40NKS-02-000000HID 3.00
$30.00$10.00GRI, 3/4 Inch Recessed Contacts BrownGRI-180-12-BRGRI 3.00 $345.00$115.00PIR REQUEST TO EXIT SENSOR WITH SOUNDER GRAYDS160BOSCH 3.00 $500.00$500.00MISC, Equipment, Hardware and ConsumablesXX-XXMISC 1.00 $165.00$55.00BATTERY, 12 Volt, 7 AmpHourBATT-1270BATTERY 3.00 $310.00$310.00CABLE, 22/6 Stranded Shielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/6PLNMCABLE 1.00 $265.00$265.00CABLE, 22/4 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/4PLNMCABLE 1.00 $200.00$200.00CABLE, 22/2 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/2PLNMCABLE 1.00 $225.00$225.00CABLE, 18/2 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-18/2PLNMCABLE 1.00 Labor Schedule for: Fire Life and Safety Headquarters
QTY Description Ext. PriceRate

32.00 $3,688.64$115.27Install

4.00 $600.00$150.00Programming

2.00 $243.58$121.79Project Management

4.00 $461.48$115.37Testing
Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
74 5Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 $47,964.44 City Hall
QTY Ext. PriceUnit PriceDescription Part #Manufacturer $2,310.00$2,310.00Concierge Onboarding (one time charge)OP-SERV-COOpenpath. 1.00 $415.00$415.00Access Control Core board with support for up to 2 expansion boards via USB. The core can be wirelessly configured with the Admin app and can be powered by 12V or 24V
OP-CR-ACCOpenpath. 1.00
$1,395.00$1,395.00Sixteen Door Mercury Dual Voltage Integrated Power System supporting one AC-MER-CONT-2DR with seven AC-MER-CON–
MR52 (Mercury hardware sold separately)
AC-LSP-16DR-MER-LCKAVIGILON- 1.00
$1,480.00$1,480.00Intelligent Controller; Linux Based with 2 doors; 8 inputs and 4 outputs; expandable up to 64 doors. (Mercury Part #: LP1502) AC-MER-CONT-LP1502AVIGILON- 1.00
$5,705.00$815.00HID® Mercury™ MR52-S3B Controller Serial I/O Dual Card Reader Interface; 2-Reader Interface Module - (2 reader: mag; wiegand; 4 reader OSDP; 8 inputs;
AC-MER-CON-MR52-S3BAVIGILON- 7.00
$4,275.00$285.00HID, Signo 40 Wall Mount, 13.56mHz Profile, OSDP/Wiegand, Mobile Ready, BLE
40NKS-02-000000HID 15.00
$1,725.00$115.00PIR REQUEST TO EXIT SENSOR WITH SOUNDER GRAYDS160BOSCH 15.00 $150.00$10.00GRI, 3/4 Inch Recessed Contacts BrownGRI-180-12-BRGRI 15.00 $330.00$55.00BATTERY, 12 Volt, 7 AmpHourBATT-1270BATTERY 6.00 $1,500.00$1,500.00MISC, Equipment, Hardware and ConsumablesXX-XXMISC 1.00 $1,550.00$310.00CABLE, 22/6 Stranded Shielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/6PLNMCABLE 5.00 $1,325.00$265.00CABLE, 22/4 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/4PLNMCABLE 5.00 $1,000.00$200.00CABLE, 22/2 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/2PLNMCABLE 5.00 $1,125.00$225.00CABLE, 18/2 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-18/2PLNMCABLE 5.00 Labor Schedule for: City Hall
QTY Description Ext. PriceRate
160.00 $18,459.20$115.37Install

16.00 $2,400.00$150.00Programming

8.00 $974.32$121.79Project Management

16.00 $1,845.92$115.37Testing
Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
75 6Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 $75,653.36 Police Department
QTY Ext. PriceUnit PriceDescription Part #Manufacturer $830.00$415.00Access Control Core board with support for up to 2 expansion boards via USB. The core can be wirelessly configured with the Admin app and can be powered by 12V or 24V
OP-CR-ACCOpenpath. 2.00
$1,395.00$1,395.00Sixteen Door Mercury Dual Voltage Integrated Power System supporting one AC-MER-CONT-2DR with seven AC-MER-CON–
MR52 (Mercury hardware sold separately)
AC-LSP-16DR-MER-LCKAVIGILON- 1.00
$875.00$875.00Eight Door Mercury Dual Voltage Integrated Power System supporting one AC-MER-CONT-2DR with three AC-MER-CON–
MR52 (Mercury hardware sold separately).

AC-LSP-8DR-MER-LCKAVIGILON- 1.00
$2,960.00$1,480.00Intelligent Controller; Linux Based with 2 doors; 8 inputs and 4 outputs; expandable up to 64 doors. (Mercury Part #: LP1502) AC-MER-CONT-LP1502AVIGILON- 2.00
$8,150.00$815.00HID® Mercury™ MR52-S3B Controller Serial I/O Dual Card Reader Interface; 2-Reader Interface Module - (2 reader: mag; wiegand; 4 reader OSDP; 8 inputs;
AC-MER-CON-MR52-S3BAVIGILON- 10.00
$3,705.00$285.00HID, Signo 40 Wall Mount, 13.56mHz Profile, OSDP/Wiegand, Mobile Ready, BLE
40NKS-02-000000HID 13.00
$4,400.00$550.00Signo40K, Wall mount w/Keypad, 13.56mHz &125kHz, OSDP/Wiegand, Terminal, Mobile Ready
40KTKS-00-000000HID 8.00
$210.00$10.00GRI, 3/4 Inch Recessed Contacts BrownGRI-180-12-BRGRI 21.00 $2,415.00$115.00PIR REQUEST TO EXIT SENSOR WITH SOUNDER GRAYDS160BOSCH 21.00 $1,200.00$1,200.00Electrified Door HardwareXX-XXMISC 1.00 $330.00$55.00BATTERY, 12 Volt, 7 AmpHourBATT-1270BATTERY 6.00 $2,500.00$2,500.00MISC, Equipment, Hardware and ConsumablesXX-XXMISC 1.00 $2,480.00$310.00CABLE, 22/6 Stranded Shielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/6PLNMCABLE 8.00 $2,120.00$265.00CABLE, 22/4 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/4PLNMCABLE 8.00 $1,600.00$200.00CABLE, 22/2 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-22/2PLNMCABLE 8.00 $1,800.00$225.00CABLE, 18/2 Stranded Unshielded Plenum 1000ftCAB-18/2PLNMCABLE 8.00 Labor Schedule for: Police Department
QTY Description Ext. PriceRate
256.00 $29,534.72$115.37Install

24.00 $3,600.00$150.00Programming

16.00 $1,948.64$121.79Project Management

24.00 $3,600.00$150.00Testing
($3,015.00)Opt. 1 - Temporary System Credit
Supplies & Materials for: Opt. 1 - Temporary System Credit QTY Description Ext. Price
Credit: (2) 1022 Board, (1) LAN, (1) P.S. 1.00 $-3,015.00 Financial Summary
$139,982.91

$6,354.81
$146,337.72
Purchase Price, Excluding taxes:

Estimated Applicable taxes:

Estimated Purchase Price, Including taxes:

Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
76 7Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 Notes that are specific to this project

1.Existing locking hardware will be reused. It is assumed that the hardware is in working order at the time of the install. If any electrified hardware is found to be defective, a change order will be provided to replace the hardware.

2.ASSI Security will use existing conduit, cable tray and/or jhooks for the cable installation. If additional cable suspension is required, a change order will be provided for those additional costs.

3.Design of the Access Control System assumes control panels for CIty Hall and PD will be located the CIty Hall IDF room shown on plans or additional costs may be incurred for additional hardware.

4.Network ports, IP addresses and connectivity to customers network to be provided at time of install .

5.The following items are excluded and are to be provided by others, if required:
·conduit, cable tray, j-boxes, plywood back board and 120 VAC ·workstations to monitor Security Systems

6.Existing Access Control Equipment will be removed and given to customer for disposal .

7.A secure room to store ASSI equipment during the install to be provided by City of Placentia .

8.All work is during regular business hours.

9.OpenPath reader software licenses are on annual subscription model and will require renewal on an annual basis.

10.Credential, which may include, cards, key fobs or mobile have been excluded and would be an additional cost.

11.Pricing valid for 60 days.

General Terms and Conditions

1.Pricing is based upon the assumption that all work will be performed during ASSI’s normal business hours. If after hours work is requested, an additional charge will be incurred.

2.ASSI carries the following insurance coverage:
·General Liability: $1 mil. per occurrence;
·$2 mil. gen. aggregate;
·W/C: $1 mil. per occurrence
·$5 mil. excess umbrella
·Auto: $2 mil. combined single limit
·Customer shall pay premiums for any additional coverage required.

3.All materials and labor are subject to a preliminary notice and subsequent filing of mechanic’s lien in the event of payment default. Customer must provide preliminary information prior to commencement of work.

4.All canceled orders and/or returned materials are subject to a 25% restocking fee.

5.A deposit is due upon acceptance of proposal. Balance will be due in progressive net 30 day payments thereafter. Deposit amount is based upon a percentage of the project total. Percentage is determined based upon thesize of the project (i.e. Proposals and change orders under $10k each require a 50% deposit; Those between $10,001-50,000 require a 35% deposit; and proposals in excess of $50,000 require a 25% deposit).

6.All new equipment is covered under warranty against defects for a period of one year from date of substantial completion of ASSI’s work. Associated labor is also covered during normal business hours.

Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
77 8Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 System Meets Plans/Specifications
System is Design Build
Mounting/Termination of Proposed Devices
System Programming
Customer Database Input/Programming
Training
Project Management
Engineering and Drawings
Record Documentation (As Builts)
Electrified Door Hardware
Door Coring/Certification/Recertification
Servers/Workstations
POE Switches
Software Install on Servers/Workstation
Installation of Wire and Cable
Installation of Cable Suspension
Regular Business Hours Installation
After Hours Installation (excl. Sunday/Holidays)
One Year Warranty Parts /Labor
Prevailing Wage
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
 o
 o
 o
o 
o 
 o
o 
o 
 o
o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
 o
 o
o 
 o
 o
Include / Exclude Include / Exclude
Performance Items
Elevator Subcontractor
Conduit
JBoxes/Specialty Back Boxes
110/120VAC Power
Access Control Cards/Tags/Transponders
Patching and Painting
Ceiling Tiles/Ceiling Grid Repairs
Vertical/Horizontal Core Drilling
Lift Rental
Camera Poles
24 HR Central Station Monitoring
Phone Lines
Static IP Address
Network Connection
Payment Performance Bonds
Method B License/Permits
Alarm Monitoring License/Permits
Low Voltage License/Permits
Fire/Life Safety Integration
Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
78 9Tammie Searfoss | [email protected] | (949) 955-0244 ASSI Security | ASSISecurity.com | 1370 Reynolds Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 Proposal Acceptance:

I have read the General Terms and Conditions and payment terms of the sale, understand them fully, and agree to abide by them.

I hereby certify that I am authorized by my company to sign this agreement. ASSI Security is hereby authorized to perform the work as specified.

Signature:

Title:

Date:

Signature:

Title:

Date:

Accepted By: ASSI Security
Name: Tammie Searfoss
Accepted By:

Name:David Radomski
City of Placentia
Date: 9/29/2024 | Proposal #: 13076-1-0-2 | Replace Existing Access Control System - City Hall, Police Department & Fire Station Headquarters
79 Agenda Item No: 1.e

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Kyra Tao
From: Public Works
Subject:

Cooperative Agreement for the Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue Corridor Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project
Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact:

Expense: $191,950.00 City's Share of Project Cost
Budget: $191,950.00 To be included in the FY 25-26 CIP Budget Summary:

The Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (“RTSSP”) has identified over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County as critical to providing coordinated traffic signal synchronization to improve regional traffic flow and congestion relief. The Kraemer corridor is identified as a candidate project in the Region’s Signal Synchronization Plan. On May 13, 2024, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) approved funding for the Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, and Grand Avenue Corridor Project (“Project”), which is a multi-jurisdictional Traffic Signal Synchronization Project between the City of Santa Ana, acting as the lead agency for the Project, and the Cities of Anaheim, Orange, Placentia, and Brea. The budget for the Project is $5,710,657.50, of which a total of $4,568,526 is funded by OCTA. There is a project funding match for each of the participating Cities. The City of Placentia’s contribution amounts to $191,950.00. This Project includes 11 traffic signals along the Kraemer corridor in Placentia.

Recommendation:

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve Cooperative Agreement for the Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/Grand Avenue Project Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program between the Cities of Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange; and

2. Authorize the Interim City Administrator and/or his designee to execute the necessary documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

Strategic Plan Statement:

There is no specific strategic planning goal or objective associated with this agenda item.

Discussion:

As part of the Measure M2 RTSSP, over 2,000 signalized intersections across Orange County 80 are proposed to be improved in order to maintain traffic signal synchronization to improve traffic flow and provide congestion relief throughout the region. The Kraemer corridor is identified as a candidate project in the Region’s Signal Synchronization Plan. The budget for the Project is $5,710,657.50. On May 13, 2024, the OCTA Board of Directors approved awarding the City of Santa Ana $4,568,526 for the Kraemer/Glassell/Grand Corridor Traffic Signal Synchronization Project with the requirement that the City and Partnering Agencies are to provide matching funds of 20% of the total project cost in the amount of $1,142,132, of which the City of Placentia’s share is $191,950.

The City of Santa Ana has agreed to act as the lead agency for design, construction, and management of the project, under the proposed Cooperative Agreement. This project will improve traffic signal synchronization for 61 signalized intersections along Kraemer Boulevard, Glassell Street, and Grand Avenue. In Placentia, the corridor starts at Orangethorpe Avenue and ends at Golden Avenue including 11 traffic signals. The scope of work includes procurement, installation of fiber optic cables, ADA-compliant pedestrian push buttons, controller cabinet upgrades, and traffic monitoring cameras at selected locations within the City of Placentia.

Fiscal Impact Summary:

The City’s share of matching project funds amounts to $191,950.00 and will be included in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program Budget. The City has typically funded these projects with a combination of Citywide Traffic Development Impact Fees, AQMD Subvention Funds and General Fund Dollars. The City’s cost share is not due to the City of Santa Ana for at least four (4) years which is when the project and monitoring period is expected to be completed. Construction is not expected to begin on this project for at least two (2) years.

Attachments
FINAL_Cooperative_Agreement_KGG - Revised.pdf
81 1

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITIES

OF SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, AND ORANGE

FOR THE KRAEMER BOULEVARD/ GLASSELL STREET/

GRAND AVENUE CORRIDOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL

SYNCHRONIZATION PROJECT
This Cooperative Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this day of , 2025, by and between the CITY OF SANTA ANA, a charter city (“SANTA ANA”), the CITY OF BREA, a municipal corporation (“BREA”), the CITY OF PLACENTIA, a municipal corporation (“PLACENTIA”), the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation (“ANAHEIM”), and the CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation (“ORANGE”).

RECITALS:

A.Santa Ana, with cooperation from Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange, applied for a grant from the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) as part of Renewed Measure M2 Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (“RTSSP”) (Project P), aimed to coordinate traffic signals across multiple jurisdictions to enhance countywide traffic flow and reduce congestion.

B.The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor Traffic Signal Synchronization Project was selected by OCTA as one of the RTSSP Projects to be funded in OCTA Fiscal Year 2024-2025. The project will include timing implementation and improvements at traffic signals along Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue, from Lambert Road in Brea to Dyer Road in Santa Ana, as listed in the Project Application attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference.

C.The total budget for the project is $5,710,657.50. 80% ($4,568,526) is funded by the OCTA Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program and 20% ($1,142,131.50) is local agencies matching funds. The breakdown is shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

D.Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange agree to provide twenty percent (20%) matching funds for the total project cost. Matching funds can be a combination of cash and in-kind match as defined by the RTSSP grant.

E.OCTA and Santa Ana have entered into a Master Funding Agreement “Cooperative Agreement No. C-1-2783” defining the terms and conditions for approved Measure M2 projects that will be implemented by Santa Ana.

F.Santa Ana agrees to serve as the lead agency to oversee the design and implementation of the project.

G.Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange desire to enter into this Cooperative Agreement to demonstrate their commitment to implement the project and improve inter- jurisdiction traffic signal synchronization on Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue.
4th February
82 2
H.This cooperative agreement defines the specific terms, conditions and funding responsibilities between Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for the implementation of the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by and between SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, and ORANGE as follows:

I.SCOPE:

This Agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of the cities as they pertain to the subjects and projects addressed herein. The project is specifically detailed in the Project Application attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. All of the cities agree that each will cooperate and coordinate with the other in all activities covered by this Agreement and any other supplemental agreements that may be required to facilitate purposes thereof.

II.MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES:

Santa Ana, Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange mutually agree to:
a.Designate a lead staff to act as the liaison for the project. The liaison and any other project personnel, if necessary, will attend and participate in all related project meetings. b.Participate, cooperate and coordinate with contractors, consultants, vendors and staff in good faith using reasonable efforts to resolve any unforeseen issues and disputes arising out of the project to the extent practicable with respect to the performance of the project. c.Maintain project related traffic signals and telecommunications equipment with high priority during the project, and be responsible for repair of their own signal control systems in each of their respective jurisdictions.
d.Provide on-site support for signal control systems, timing plans, detection systems and related equipment during construction, installation and integration, and be available to change or make adjustments to timing plans when necessitated by the project. e.Document in-kind match or dollar match funding as identified in the project application, and provide verification of such expenditures as part of any review or audit process, which may include payroll records, contracts and purchase orders. f.Monitor and operate the project traffic signals and improvements within its jurisdiction for a period of two (2) years following the completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project, as required by the program funding.
g.Coordinate the inclusion of other improvements and in-kind services, where necessary, that the owning agency requires for the implementation of the project, but are not included in the project application. The owning agency shall be responsible for the inclusion of such elements within reason and at its own costs.
h.Unused project funds for improvements from one City can be used by another City (with matching fund responsibility) upon mutual consent of the involved parties. 83 3
III.RESPONSIBILITIES OF SANTA ANA:

Santa Ana agrees to the following responsibilities:
a.Santa Ana shall serve as lead agency for design, construction and construction management of the project, and shall provide oversight by establishing milestones and overseeing the project development to ensure that all standards and requirements set forth by the agreement is adhered to.
b.Santa Ana shall be responsible for completing the project in accordance with the funding guidelines and any and all other OCTA requirements related to these funding programs.

Santa Ana shall maintain coordination with all participating agencies throughout the duration of the project.
c.Santa Ana shall provide staff, consultants, and contractors deemed necessary and appropriate to manage, administer, coordinate, and oversee timing implementation, engineering design, bid and award, and construction management of the project. d.Santa Ana shall enter into an agreement with a qualified consultant and contractor to assist in the completion and monitoring of the project. e.Santa Ana shall enter into any required Cooperative Agreement with Caltrans regarding Caltrans Improvements in cities; to comply with all the terms and conditions of said Cooperative Agreement; to pay invoices for such Caltrans Improvements as required by Caltrans; and to invoice participating agencies in a timely manner with detailed documentation of said Caltrans Improvements
f.Santa Ana shall coordinate the work effort of this Project, provide the day to day management of the consultant and manage all consultant administration and contracting.

Santa Ana shall review the consultant’s invoices and pay them accordingly after ensuring that the work has been adequately performed by the consultant. g.Santa Ana shall provide its share of matching fund as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application.
h.Upon issuance of a Notice to Proceed to the Consultant, Santa Ana can issue invoices to Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, and Orange for up to 80% of the cash match amount identified in Exhibit A. The remaining cash match amount will be invoiced after completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project.
i.Santa Ana shall comply with all of the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Agreement with OCTA, including the Project Reporting and Audit Requirements contained therein.

IV.RESPONSIBILITIES OF BREA,
Brea agrees to the following responsibilities:
84 4
a. Brea shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application.

b. Brea shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction. No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services.

c. Brea shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction.

V. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PLACENTIA:

Placentia agrees to the following responsibilities:

a. Placentia shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application.

b. Placentia shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction.

No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services.

c. Placentia shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction.

VI. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ANAHEIM:

Anaheim agrees to the following responsibilities:

a. Anaheim shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application.

b. Anaheim shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction.

No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services.

c. Anaheim shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction.

VII. RESPONSIBILITIES OF ORANGE:

Orange agrees to the following responsibilities:

a. Orange shall provide its share of matching funds as shown in Exhibit A. The final amount may vary and will be based on the 20% of actual cost of implementing all timing, improvements and maintenance, as identified in the project application.

b. Orange shall provide Construction Inspection on all improvements within its jurisdiction.

No additional compensation from the project is provided for providing inspection services.

85 5
c. Orange shall waive all costs and fees related to any and all permits, if such permits are required to perform any project related work within its jurisdiction.

VIII. COMPLETE AGREEMENT:

a. This Agreement, including any attachments incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement between SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, and ORANGE and it supersedes all prior representations, understandings and communications between the parties. The invalidity in whole or in part of any term or condition of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or conditions(s) of this Agreement. The above referenced Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein.

b. Any modification of this Agreement shall only be by amendment upon written mutual consent of all cities. All modifications, amendments, changes and revisions of this Agreement in whole or in part, and from time to time, shall be binding upon the cities so long as the same shall be in writing and executed by each ag ency.

c. A party’s failure to insist on any instance(s) of any other party’s performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the non-enforcing party’s right to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and the nonperforming party’s obligation in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect. Changes to any portion of this Agreement shall not be binding upon either party except when specifically confirmed in writing by way of a written amendment to this Agreement between the parties and issued in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

IX. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION:

a. Each city shall jointly and severally indemnify, defend and hold harmless every other city, it’s officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims for any loss or damages, bodily injuries, damage to, or loss of property caused by the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct by that city, its officers, directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this Agreement.

b. Each city shall maintain adequate levels of insurance, or self -insurance to assure full indemnification of every other city.

X. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS:

a. Term of Agreement: This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2030. This Agreement may be extended at the mutual consent of all parties in writing.

b. SANTA ANA, BREA, PLACENTIA, ANAHEIM, and ORANGE hereto affirm that they are authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of said parties and that, by so executing this agreement, the parties hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement.

c. Severability: If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby, and each term, 86 6
provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

d. Counterparts of Agreement: This Agreement may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same agreement. Facsimile and electronic signatures will be permitted.

e. In the event that the project costs exceed the estimates submitted in the Project Application as prepared, all parties agree to meet and determine project revisions to meet the budget, or a revised funding proposal by the cities that shall be documented and submitted in writing as a revision to the Agreement.

f. The parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations of any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the project.

g. Force Majeure: Any party shall be excused from performing its obligations under this Agreement during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including, but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood; acts of God; commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government; national fuel shortage; or, a material act or omission by the other party; when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other parties, and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the party not performing.

h. Assignment: Neither this Agreement, nor any of the parties’ rights, obligations, or duties hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by any party without the prior written consent of all the other parties in their sole and absolute discretion. Any such attempt of assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment.

i. Obligations To Comply with Law: Nothing herein shall be deemed nor construed to authorize or require any party to issue bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness under the terms, in amounts, or for purposes other than as authorized by local, state or federal law.

j. Governing Law: The laws of the State of California and applicable local and federal laws, regulations and guidelines shall govern this Agreement.

k. Litigation fees: Should litigation arise out of this Agreement for the performance thereof, the court shall award costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees, to the prevailing party.

l. Notices: Any notices, requests, or demands made between the parties pursuant to this Agreement are to be directed as follows:

City of Santa Ana
Public Works Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43
Santa Ana, CA 92701
87 7
Cesar Rodriguez
Sr. Civil Engineer
(714) 647-5626
[email protected]
City of Brea
Public Works Department
1 Civic Center Circle
Brea, CA 92821
Ryan Chapman
City Engineer
714-990-7763
[email protected]
City of Placentia
Public Works Department
401 E. Chapman Ave.

Placentia, CA 92870
Christopher Tanio
Director of Public Works/City
Engineer
714-993-8132
[email protected]
City of Anaheim
Public Works Department
200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite
276 Anaheim, CA 92805
John Thai
Principal Traffic Engineer
714-765-5294
[email protected]
City of Orange
Public Works Department
300 E. Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
Gabrielle Hayes
Principal Civil Engineer
714-744-5561
[email protected]
XI.DELAGATED AUTHORITY:

The actions required to be taken by the cities in the implementation of this Agreement are delegated to its City Manager or equivalent designee.
[SIGNATURES ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES]
88 8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:

CITY OF SANTA ANA:

ALVARO NUNEZ
City Manager
ATTEST:

JENNIFER L. HALL
Clerk of the Council
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By:

JONATHAN T. MARTINEZ
Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

NABIL SABA
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
89 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:

CITY OF BREA:

Kristin Griffith
Interim City Manager
ATTEST:

Lillian Harris-Neal
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Terence Boga
City Attorney
90 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:

CITY OF PLACENTIA:

Thomas R. Hatch
Interim City Administrator
ATTEST:

Robert S. McKinnell
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Christian L. Bettenhausen
City Attorney
91 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:

CITY OF ANAHEIM:

Jim Vanderpool
City Manager

ATTEST:

Theresa Bass
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Bryn Morley
Deputy City Attorney

92 12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written:

CITY OF ORANGE:

Thomas C. Kisela
City Manager

ATTEST:

Pamela Coleman
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Mike Vigliotta
City Attorney

93 EXHIBIT A

KRAEMER BOULEVARD/ GLASSELL STREET/ GRAND AVENUE CORRIDOR TSSP

PROJECT FUNDS BREAKDOWN
Agency Project Funds by
Agency*
M2 Grant
(80%)
Local Match (20%)
Total Match**
Match Type
Cash In-kind
1 Brea
PI $580,600 $464,480 $116,120 $116,120 $0
O&M $16,800 $13,440 $3,360 $3,360 $0
2 Placentia
PI $928,950 $743,160 $185,790 $185,790 $0
O&M $30,800 $24,640 $6,160 $6,160 $0
3 Anaheim
PI $633,675 $506,940 $126,735 $126,735 $0
O&M $19,600 $15,680 $3,920 $3,920 $0
4 Orange
PI $1,543,450 $1,234,760 $308,690 $308,690 $0
O&M $50,400 $40,320 $10,080 $10,080 $0
5 Santa Ana
PI $1,844,782.50 $1,475,826 $368,956.50 $338,956.50 $30,000 O&M $61,600 $49,280 $12,320 $12,320 $0
Total $5,710,657.50 $4,568,526 $1,142,131.50 $1,112,131.50 $30,000 *: Unused project funds from one Agency can be transferred to another Agency with mutual consent.
**: Total match amount may vary; the final match amount will be based on the actual project implementation costs, to be determined at completion of the Primary Implementation Phase of the project.
94 EXHIBIT B

KRAEMER BOULEVARD/ GLASSELL STREET/ GRAND AVENUE CORRIDOR TSSP

PROJECT APPLICATION

95 15.1
61 Santa Ana
Brea
Placentia
Anaheim
Orange
Caltrans
Applicant Agency:City of
Contact Name:

Contact Number:

Contact Email:

Application Deadline
Project Overview
Total Match:
$5,710,657.50
$4,568,526.00
$1,142,131.50
Length of Corridor (mi):

Number of signals:

Total Project Cost:

M2 funds requested:

FY 2024 Call for Projects
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
Project P
Supplemental Application
10/26/2023
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor Santa Ana
Cesar Rodriguez
714-647-54626
[email protected]
Cash Match:

In-kind Match:

Participating Agencies:
$1,112,131.50
$30,000.00
96 Project P Supplemental Application Checklist Page
RTSSP Online Application – submitted through OCFundTracker a. Transportation Significance
b. Economic Effectiveness
c. Project Characteristics
d. Project Scale
e. Number of Jurisdictions
f. Current Project Status
g. Funding Match
h. Cabinet photos, equipment specifications, as-built drawings, cabinet drawings, etc. Online only Section 1: Key Technical Information
a. Name of Project Corridor/Grid/Route 1
b. Project Limits 1
c. Project Length 1
d. Number of Signalized Intersections Along Corridor 1 e. Participating Agencies/Traffic Forum Members 1
f. Lead Agency 1
g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize 1
h. Project Start and End Date 1
i. Previous funding 1
j. Contact Information 1
k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project 2 l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project 2 m. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits 3
Section 2: Regional Significance 4
Section 3: Acknowledgement of Required Tasks 5-8
Section 4: Funding Needs/Costs for Proposed Project by Task a. Summary of Project Cost 9
b. Summary of Cost by Agency 10-11
c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs 12-13
Section 5: Detailed Local Match Commitment 14
Section 6: Project Schedule by Task
a. Project Start and End Dates 15
b. Project Schedule by Task 15
Appendices
A. Calculations and Estimated Points
B. Agency Improvement Calculations
C. Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
D. Agency Resolutions and Letters of Support
E. Cabinet Photos and As-built drawings (Uploaded to OCFundTracker and included in Electronic Submittal Only)
Online
Project P Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program Table of Contents
i 97

SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP a. Project
b.
from to
c.Project Length (miles ):
d.Number of signalized intersections along the corridor (include all Caltrans intersections):
number of signals on project corridor(s) number of offset signals included in this project e.Participating agencies / Traffic Forum Members (including applicant agency ):
f. Lead Agency
g. Designation of the corridor to synchronize:
h. Project End Date:
i.
j. Contact Information (Include name, title, agency, phone, email, and address) John Thai, Principal Traffic Engineer
City of Anaheim, 714-765-5294
[email protected]
200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 276
Anaheim, CA 92805
Gabrielle Hayes, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Orange, 714-744-5561
[email protected]
300 E. Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
Pauline Nguyen, Branch Chief, Traffic Signals/Ramp
Metering/
Census Caltrans District 12, 949-279-9168
6681 Marine Way
Irvine, CA 92618
Kyra Tao, Transportation Manager
City of Placentia, 714-993-8121
[email protected]
401 E. Chapman Ave.

Placentia, CA 92870
Cesar Rodriguez, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana, 714-647-5626
[email protected]
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Albert Espinoza, City Engineer
City of Brea, 714-990-7657
[email protected]
1 Civic Center Circle
Brea, CA 92821
Select any that apply:

Corridor
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue Corridor

15.14 Project Limits:

Santa Ana
361
Lambert Road Dyer Road
December 31, 2027January 1, 2025Project Start Date:

Signal Synchronization Network Corridor / Priority Corridor Master Plan of Arterial Highways Corridor Anaheim
Buena Park
Caltrans
Costa Mesa
Cypress
Dana Point
Fountain Valley
Fullerton
Garden Grove
Huntington Beach
La Habra
La Palma
Laguna Beach
Laguna Hills
Mission Viejo
Orange
Placentia
Rancho Santa Margarita
San Clemente
Santa Ana
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Westminster
County of Orange Irvine Lake Forest
San Juan Capistrano
Yorba Linda
Aliso Viejo
Brea
Laguna Niguel
Laguna Woods
Los Alamitos
Re-timing at least 75% of previous project Timing at least 75% of new eligible project Newport Beach
None
All participating agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project 1 98

SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATION Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP k. Signalized intersections that are part of the project:
1 Kraemer Boulevard Lambert Road 40 Glassell Street SR-22 Westbound Ramp * 2 Kraemer Boulevard Birch Street 41 Glassell Street SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * 3 Kraemer Boulevard Orbiter Street 42 Grand Avenue Fairhaven Avenue 4 Kraemer Boulevard Birch Hills Mall 43 Grand Avenue Santa Clara Avenue 5 Kraemer Boulevard Imperial Highway (SR-90) * 44 Grand Avenue 21st Street 6 Kraemer Boulevard Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street 45 Grand Avenue 17th Street 7 Kraemer Boulevard Golden Avenue 46 Grand Avenue I-5 Northbound Ramp 8 Kraemer Boulevard Patrician Lane 47 Grand Avenue Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp 9 Kraemer Boulevard Bastanchury Road 48 Grand Avenue Fruit Street 10 Kraemer Boulevard Yorba Linda Boulevard 49 Grand Avenue OC Register 11 Kraemer Boulevard Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue 50 Grand Avenue 4th Street 12 Kraemer Boulevard Madison Avenue 51 Grand Avenue 1st Street 13 Kraemer Boulevard Alta Vista Street 52 Grand Avenue Chestnut Avenue 14 Kraemer Boulevard Chapman Avenue (North) 53 Grand Avenue McFadden Avenue 15 Kraemer Boulevard Hawaii Way 54 Grand Avenue Century High School 16 Kraemer Boulevard Crowther Avenue 55 Grand Avenue Edinger Avenue 17 Kraemer Boulevard Orangethorpe Avenue 56 Grand Avenue St Andrew Place 18 Kraemer Boulevard La Jolla Street 57 Grand Avenue St Gertrude Place 19 Kraemer Boulevard Miraloma Avenue 58 Grand Avenue Warner Avenue 20 Kraemer Boulevard Coronado Street 59 Grand Avenue Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr 21 Kraemer Boulevard Fire Signal 60 Grand Avenue SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp 22 Kraemer Boulevard La Palma Avenue 61 Grand Avenue Dyer Road 23 Kraemer Boulevard SR-91 Westbound Off -Ramp *
24 Kraemer Boulevard Frontera Street
25 Glassell Street Riverdale Avenue
26 Glassell Street Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue
27 Glassell Street Lincoln Avenue
28 Glassell Street Fletcher Avenue
29 Glassell Street Meats Avenue
30 Glassell Street Grove Avenue
31 Glassell Street Orange Olive Road
32 Glassell Street Taft Avenue
33 Glassell Street Katella Avenue
34 Glassell Street Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue Legend
35 Glassell Street Collins Avenue
36 Glassell Street Walnut Avenue
37 Glassell Street Sycamore Avenue/University Drive
38 Glassell Street Palm Avenue
39 Glassell Street La Veta Avenue
*Caltrans
l. Offset signalized intersections that are part of the project:
1 Taft Avenue 13
2 Fairhaven Avenue 14
3 Santa Ana Boulevard 15
4 16
5 17
6 18
7 19
8 20
9 10
11 12
Main Corridor
Main Street Cross Street Main Street
Brea
Placentia
Main Corridor Cross Street
I-5 SB On/Off Ramp
Anaheim
Shaffer Street
Cambridge Street
Cross Street
Santa Ana
Orange
Cross Street
2 99

SECTION 1: KEY TECHNICAL INFORMATIONKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPm. Project Map Depicting the Project Limits and Offset Signals3100

SECTION 2: REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Explain why this project is regionally significant:

The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor is a reinvigorated project originally performed and funded by M2 RTSSP in FY 2013/2014. The Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor extends 15.14 miles from Lambert Road in the City of Brea to Dyer Road in the City of Santa Ana. The corridor encompasses 61 signalized intersections controlled by the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim, Orange, Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Caltrans is a participating agency in the project and the participating Cities are committed to executing a cooperative agreement with Caltrans for the implementation of optimized signal timing at the Caltrans intersections.

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor is currently classified as a Major Arterial in the Cities of Brea, Placentia, Anaheim and Santa Ana and as a Primary Arterial in the City of Orange. The corridor is also designated as part of a Priority Corridor Network by the Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan. The corridor carries traffic volumes ranging from 13,000 to 21,000 in Cities of Brea and Placentia; up to approximately 46,000 in City of Anaheim, down to approximately 8,000 in Old Towne Orange, to over 40,000 vehicles daily in Santa Ana.

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor stretches from the northern County limits to the center of Orange County encompassing a wide range of land uses. At the northern limit in City of Brea, the arterial primarily serves a mix of residential, retail and large commercial including Birch Hills Mall and biomedical manufacturing company Beckman Coulter. This area experiences high morning and evening peak traffic volumes that require a well-synchronized network to meet the peak demand. In City of Placentia, the corridor primarily serves residential, small retail and schools including Tri-City Park and nearby Valencia High School. This area experiences moderately high morning and evening peak traffic volumes and requires a well balanced traffic signal system that serves both daily vehicle commuters and local pedestrian and bike users. In City of Anaheim, the corridor primarily serves large industrial and commercial businesses and cuts through the Anaheim Canyon Business District. This area is being reimagined by the City of Anaheim and looks to create a business environment attractive to a wide variety of industries while encouraging sustainable development. This area sees the highest traffic volume of the corridor and is adjacent to the Caltrans SR-91 Freeway which requires a well sychronized traffic signal system that accounts for high volume of vehicle and large trucks traffic. In the City of Orange, the corridor serves a mix of residential, small business, schools and historic landmarks including Chapman University and Old Towne Orange. This area experiences lower traffic volume but requires special signal timing and active transportation elements to efficiently accommodate the mix of vehicle, pedestrians and bicycles. At the southern limit in City of Santa Ana, the corridor serves a mix of residential, schools, and large manufacturing and commercial businesses including Behr Paint Company and several Orange County government facilities. This area sees some of the highest traffic volumes and demands a well-synchronized network to meet the directional and oversaturated traffic demand.

The original signal timing and improvements on Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue corridor has decayed and needs to be revisited. Therefore, it is imperative that this very important corridor be considered for the 2024 Call for Projects from OCTA.
4 101

SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
a.PROJECT TASKS
Primary Implementation (PI) Phase, lasting approximately one year shall include the following:

Task 1:

Task 2:

By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to the following tasks:

Project Management - PI Phase
Data Collection and Field Review
This task is ongoing throughout the duration of the PI Phase of the project. It includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, progress reports, tracking of schedules, tracking of cost by agency, invoicing, and overall administration of the PROJECT.

The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task:
• A running record of project cost broken down by Participating Agency shall be part of this task.

This information will be used by the Lead Agency to bill Participating Agencies for their respective project match.
• A running record of all scope changes and/or any deviations from the final approved application.

This information will be used by the Lead Agency to request for Scope Changes at the Semi-Annual Review (SAR).

All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study will be completed. However, Data Collection will be be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections and utilized to develop Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection efforts. Funding for Data Collection at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2.

This task shall include collecting seven-day, 24-hour machine counts, including vehicle and bike classifications, along each 1-mile segment of the corridor(s). The project shall also produce weekday and weekend peak period intersection turning movement (ITM) counts at every signalized intersection, including pedestrian and bicycle counts. ITM counts shall be conducted for two hours of each weekday peak period (AM, mid-day, and PM) and a single four-hour Saturday mid-day peak period. All counts shall be summarized in Microsoft Excel format. All data shall adhere to the CTFP Guidelines for data compatibility.

Data collection also includes field review of before and after conditions. The floating car method shall be utilized with software and GPS for the ’Before’ Study to fine-tune the corridor operation and verify integrity of system intersection clocks. Synchronized Video shall be used to compare actual conditions to anticipated conditions dictated by the time-space diagram so that any anomalies may be corrected prior to the ’After’ studies task.

Field review conducted as part of this task will document the existing conditions for all signal timing, infrastructure, and system improvements on the project. This includes pre-construction pictures for comparison during the post-construction walkthrough, should there be any questions or discrepancies noted by any parties. Data Collection and Field Review Memos shall be provided to all participating agencies.

Check this box to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the data collection portion of Task 2 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. A Before/After study is still required. A memorandum shall be submitted to indicate completion of this task. 5 102

SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Task 3:

Task 4:

Task 5:

System Design and Construction
Final PI Report
Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Check this box to indicate all agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation task (Task 4) due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. The Final PI Report shall still include a section on timing optimization and implementation from the Baseline Project.

The Lead Agency will hire a consultant(s), licensed contractor(s), and/or use city staff, or extension of staff, to design, procure, install, construct, and implement all desired components of the project as described in this application in accordance with the CTFP Guidelines.

All work and equipment supplied for the project shall comply and be done in accordance with the latest standards and provisions of each Participating Agency or latest approved California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standard Plans and Standard Specifications.

As-built plans shall be provided to match the improvements. This task is not complete until all participating agencies approve the improvements implemented in their jurisdiction.

All agencies on this application will opt out of the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections and coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation efforts. Funding for Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 4.

Synchronization will be inter-jurisdictional in nature. All existing traffic patterns, flows, and conditions will be taken into account. At a minimum, synchronized timing plans will be developed for a weekday AM, Mid-day, PM, and a Weekend peak period. Special generators such as schools and businesses along with cross street traffic will be considered as part of the project. Timing plans that will be developed will assist traffic in getting to its destination without regard to physical or jurisdictional boundaries.

The following list is a minimum of what is required of this task:
• A review of the basic timing parameters
• Concept of Operations documenting the recommended coordination strategies (e.g. segments, cycle lengths, etc.) based on existing data collection and simulations • Existing and Optimized simulation networks in Synchro (version 10) that is also shared with OCTA using the OCTA designated ID numbers
• Implementation and fine-tuning of proposed timing plans This task will not be complete until all participating agencies approve the new timing plans implemented.

A Final PI Report, with an executive summary, shall provide complete documentation of the project, including, but not limited to:
• Project scope, objectives, locations, findings, and recommendations • Data collected: counts, travel time studies, and project benefits achieved in terms of fuel savings, travel time, and other measurable parameters
• For each intersection: lane configurations, signal phasing, turning movement data, and cycle lengths for existing and proposed timings for all peak periods 6 103

SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
By checking this box, the following additional PI task(s) and/or exceptions will be made:

Task 6:

Task 7:

Task 8:

ONGOING OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) PHASE, lasting approximately two (2) years, shall include the following:

Final O&M Report
Continuing Support
Project Management - O&M Phase
During this 24-month period, the signal timing along the corridor/route/grid shall be observed and fine- tuned. This task shall also include the monitoring, maintaining, and repair of detection and communication implemented as part of this project. Monthly drives shall be conducted along the length of the project during all designated corridor synchronization timing plan hours of operation in order to verify that the synchronization timing is working as designed and complete any necessary adjustments. This is followed by a monthly memorandum summarizing the status and trends of the corridor based on the runs conducted. Trip logs for the month shall be provided to the Participating Agencies. The memorandum shall include all additional tasks requested and completed during that month. Performance metrics comparisons from ATSPM, where available, shall also be included in the memorandum.

All agencies on this application will opt out of the Data Collection portion of Task 2 and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation portion of Task 4 due to participation in the Countywide Baseline Project. However, Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation will be conducted at the four (4) Caltrans intersections. These efforts will be closely coordinated with the Countywide Baseline Project. Cities of Brea, Anaheim and Orange are committed to excecuting a Cooperative Agreeement with Caltrans for the Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation efforts. A Before/After study will be completed for the entire corridor including the Caltrans locations. No system construction is proposed at the Caltrans locations. Funding for Data Collection and Signal Timing Optimization/ Implementation at the Caltrans intersection is included in the respective Agency Task 2 and 4.
• All work performed for system construction and signal timing optimization • Implementation schedule and improvements accomplished, including dates • Procedures for continuing maintenance, surveillance, and evaluation of the coordinated signal system
The report shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations based on PI tasks for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. The report shall be completed in accordance with the current CTFP Guidelines.

Finally, the report shall provide recommendations with cost and benefit estimates for future improvements to traffic signal infrastructure (signal controllers, vehicle detection, communications, etc.), intersection capacity (appropriate signal phasing, lane geometrics, and alleviation of physical bottlenecks that curtail arterial capacity), and traffic management strategies. These proposed improvements should be useful in determining future enhancements to the corridor.

A Project Summary Sheet, one sheet front and back, that describes the project and improvements gained shall be provided to OCTA. This sheet will be used by OCTA and Participating Agencies to present to the Board and elected officials.

This task includes day-to-day project management, such as meetings, tracking of schedules, invoicing, and overall administration of the project. This task shall continue in full force as specified in the Primary Implementation Phase.
7 104

SECTION 3: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REQUIRED TASKS
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
By checking this box, the following additional O&M task(s) and/or exceptions will be made:
b.
c.ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MEETING CTFP GUIDELINES

By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, certify that all current CTFP guidelines were met for this project.

By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to obtain environmental clearance and other permits (if needed) for this project

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND OTHER PERMITS
At the end of the O&M Phase, a Final O&M Report documenting the Ongoing Operations and Maintenance efforts and procedures for continuing maintenance shall be prepared. At the minimum, the memorandum shall include when travel runs were conducted and issues and solutions throughout the phase. The memorandum shall document all planned and programmed improvements on the study corridor as well as recommendations for further infrastructure improvements that would likely improve the corridor signal coordination project results. 8 105

SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
a. Summary of Project Cost
Match Commitment: 20%(minimum 20%)
Total Project Cost (PI and O&M for a total of 3 years):

Total M2 Request:

Total Agency Match:

Total Project Cost:

Total M2 Request for PI Phase:

Total Agency Match for PI Phase:

Total PI Cost:

Total M2 Request for O&M Phase:

Total Agency Match for O&M Phase:

Total O&M Cost:

Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Project Tasks Total Cost
5,710,657.50$
19,200.00$
134,400.00$
25,600.00$
64,000.00$
20,000.00$
5,236,457.50$
70,200.00$
140,800.00$
Total Project Cost:

Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Task 7: Continuing Support
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
35,840.00$
179,200.00$
Task 5: Project Report
4,568,526.00$
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
PI Total
4,425,166.00$
1,106,291.50$
Project Total
1,142,131.50$
5,710,657.50$
5,531,457.50$
O&M Total
143,360.00$
8 106

SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
b. Summary of Cost by Agency
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
51 6
2,200.00$ 13,200.00$
1,200.00$ 7,200.00$
-549,200.00$
5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
1,000.00$ 6,000.00$
400.00$ 2,400.00$
2,100.00$ 12,600.00$
300.00$ 1,800.00$
PI
O&M
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
11 0 11
2,200.00$ 24,200.00$
1,000.00$ 11,000.00$
-882,750.00$
-$ -$
1,000.00$ 11,000.00$
400.00$ 4,400.00$
2,100.00$ 23,100.00$
300.00$ 3,300.00$
PI
O&M
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
61 7
2,200.00$ 15,400.00$
1,200.00$ 8,400.00$
-597,875.00$
5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
1,000.00$ 7,000.00$
400.00$ 2,800.00$
2,100.00$ 14,700.00$
300.00$ 2,100.00$
PI
O&M
6,160.00$ 30,800.00$
Cost / Int Total Cost
M2 Requested Match Total Cost
506,940.00$ 126,735.00$
Total Cost
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
Placentia
Number of Signals:

Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Cost / Int
Brea
Number of Signals:

Task 5: Project Report
Project Tasks (Brea)
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 7: Continuing Support
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Total Cost
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
24,640.00$
3,360.00$
116,120.00$
13,440.00$
464,480.00$
743,160.00$
580,600.00$
Project Tasks (Placentia)
Cost / Int Total Cost
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
185,790.00$ 928,950.00$
M2 Requested Match Total Cost
633,675.00$
15,680.00$ 3,920.00$ 19,600.00$
MatchM2 Requested
16,800.00$
Anaheim
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Number of Signals:

Project Tasks (Anaheim)
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
9 107

SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
15 2 1 18
2,200.00$ 39,600.00$
1,200.00$ 21,600.00$
-1,454,250.00$
5,000.00$ 10,000.00$
1,000.00$ 18,000.00$
400.00$ 7,200.00$
2,100.00$ 37,800.00$
300.00$ 5,400.00$
PI
O&M
Agency Caltrans Offset Total
20 2 22
2,200.00$ 48,400.00$
1,000.00$ 22,000.00$
-1,752,382.50$
-$ -$
1,000.00$ 22,000.00$
400.00$ 8,800.00$
2,100.00$ 46,200.00$
300.00$ 6,600.00$
PI
O&M
10,080.00$
M2 Requested
Santa Ana
Number of Signals:
12,320.00$ 61,600.00$
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Cost / Int Total Cost
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
368,956.50$
1,234,760.00$ 308,690.00$ 1,543,450.00$
40,320.00$
Project Tasks (Orange)Cost / Int
Match Total Cost
M2 Requested Match Total Cost
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Total Cost
Orange
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Project Tasks (Santa Ana)
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
1,475,826.00$ 1,844,782.50$
49,280.00$
50,400.00$
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Number of Signals:
10 108

SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs
Design Construction TOTAL
Average
Score
1 Brea Lambert Road 7,000.00$ 89,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 31.3 2 Brea Birch Street 7,000.00$ 89,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 31.3 3 Brea Orbiter Street 6,000.00$ 76,500.00$ 82,500.00$ 31.7 4 Brea Birch Hills Mall 10,000.00$ 127,500.00$ 137,500.00$ 31.3 5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street 7,000.00$ 89,250.00$ 96,250.00$ 31.3 7 Placentia Golden Avenue 6,200.00$ 79,050.00$ 85,250.00$ 27.5 8 Placentia Patrician Lane 7,200.00$ 91,800.00$ 99,000.00$ 31.3 9 Placentia Bastanchury Road 9,400.00$ 119,850.00$ 129,250.00$ 35.0 10 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard 2,800.00$ 35,700.00$ 38,500.00$ 32.5 11 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue 1,000.00$ 12,750.00$ 13,750.00$ 15.0 12 Placentia Madison Avenue 2,000.00$ 25,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 22.5 13 Placentia Alta Vista Street 11,400.00$ 145,350.00$ 156,750.00$ 32.0 14 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North) 6,800.00$ 86,700.00$ 93,500.00$ 31.3 15 Placentia Hawaii Way 1,000.00$ 12,750.00$ 13,750.00$ 15.0 16 Placentia Crowther Avenue 1,000.00$ 12,750.00$ 13,750.00$ 15.0 17 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue 6,200.00$ 79,050.00$ 85,250.00$ 26.7 18 Anaheim La Jolla Street 6,850.00$ 87,337.50$ 94,187.50$ 31.0 19 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue 7,850.00$ 100,087.50$ 107,937.50$ 32.5 20 Anaheim Coronado Street 5,850.00$ 74,587.50$ 80,437.50$ 31.3 21 Anaheim Fire Signal 1,550.00$ 19,762.50$ 21,312.50$ 45.0 22 Anaheim La Palma Avenue 6,450.00$ 82,237.50$ 88,687.50$ 33.0 23 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off -Ramp * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 24 Anaheim Frontera Street 7,850.00$ 100,087.50$ 107,937.50$ 32.5 25 Orange Riverdale Avenue 5,300.00$ 67,575.00$ 72,875.00$ 27.0 26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue 5,300.00$ 67,575.00$ 72,875.00$ 27.0 27 Orange Lincoln Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 28 Orange Fletcher Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 29 Orange Meats Avenue 11,600.00$ 147,900.00$ 159,500.00$ 31.7 30 Orange Grove Avenue 13,500.00$ 172,125.00$ 185,625.00$ 31.7 31 Orange Orange Olive Road -$ -$ -$ 32 Orange Taft Avenue 2,600.00$ 33,150.00$ 35,750.00$ 40.0 33 Orange Katella Avenue 1,900.00$ 24,225.00$ 26,125.00$ 30.0 34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue 2,600.00$ 33,150.00$ 35,750.00$ 40.0 35 Orange Collins Avenue 2,600.00$ 33,150.00$ 35,750.00$ 40.0 36 Orange Walnut Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 36.7 38 Orange Palm Avenue 6,600.00$ 84,150.00$ 90,750.00$ 40.0 39 Orange La Veta Avenue 7,700.00$ 98,175.00$ 105,875.00$ 35.0 40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp * -$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 50.0 42 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue 16,200.00$ 208,447.50$ 224,647.50$ 32.9 43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 44 Santa Ana 21st Street 8,900.00$ 115,372.50$ 124,272.50$ 37.0 45 Santa Ana 17th Street 8,900.00$ 115,372.50$ 124,272.50$ 37.0 46 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 47 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I -5 Southbound Ram 4,000.00$ 52,897.50$ 56,897.50$ 33.8 48 Santa Ana Fruit Street 8,700.00$ 112,822.50$ 121,522.50$ 30.0 49 Santa Ana OC Register 2,100.00$ 28,672.50$ 30,772.50$ 40.0 50 Santa Ana 4th Street 7,800.00$ 101,347.50$ 109,147.50$ 40.0 TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS
LOC.AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS
11 109

SECTION 4: FUNDING NEEDS / COSTS FOR PROPOSED PROJECT BY TASK Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
c. Summary of Intersection Improvement Costs
Design Construction TOTAL
Average
Score
TASK 3 IMPROVEMENT TOTALS
LOC.AGENCY PROJECT CROSS STREETS
51 Santa Ana 1st Street 8,100.00$ 103,275.00$ 111,375.00$ 31.7 52 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue 1,900.00$ 26,122.50$ 28,022.50$ 27.5 53 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue 14,900.00$ 191,872.50$ 206,772.50$ 33.3 54 Santa Ana Century High School 3,900.00$ 51,622.50$ 55,522.50$ 38.8 55 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue 2,700.00$ 34,425.00$ 37,125.00$ 22.5 56 Santa Ana St Andrew Place 3,500.00$ 46,522.50$ 50,022.50$ 33.8 57 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 58 Santa Ana Warner Avenue 8,700.00$ 110,925.00$ 119,625.00$ 20.0 59 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 60 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off -Ramp 2,700.00$ 36,322.50$ 39,022.50$ 35.0 61 Santa Ana Dyer Road 1,900.00$ 26,122.50$ 28,022.50$ 27.5 -- - -$ -$ -$
1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street 12,800.00$ 163,200.00$ 176,000.00$ 22.5 2 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Stre 2,100.00$ 26,775.00$ 28,875.00$ 40.0 3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp 2,700.00$ 34,425.00$ 37,125.00$ 32.5 - Santa Ana TMC Improvements -$ 63,250.00$ 63,250.00$ 40.0 - Placentia TMC Improvements -$ 126,500.00$ 126,500.00$ 40.0 - Orange TMC Improvements 1,900.00$ 87,475.00$ 89,375.00$ 35.0 - Anaheim TMC Improvements -$ 94,875.00$ 94,875.00$ 40.0 - Brea TMC Improvements -$ 37,950.00$ 37,950.00$ 40.0 5,236,457.50$ 33.6SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL =
12 110

SECTION 5: DETAILED LOCAL MATCH COMMITMENT
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP

PI OMM PI OMM PI OMM
$116,120.00 $3,360.00 $0.00 $0.00 $116,120.00 $3,360.00 $185,790.00 $6,160.00 $0.00 $0.00 $185,790.00 $6,160.00 $126,735.00 $3,920.00 $0.00 $0.00 $126,735.00 $3,920.00 $308,690.00 $10,080.00 $0.00 $0.00 $308,690.00 $10,080.00 $338,956.50 $12,320.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $368,956.50 $12,320.00 $1,076,291.50 $35,840.00 $30,000.00 $0.00 $1,106,291.50 $35,840.00 A. Cash Match
Agency Funding Source Amount of Cash
Contribution
Brea Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare $119,480.00
Placentia Gas Tax/ AB2766 $191,950.00
Anaheim Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare $130,655.00
Orange Gas Tax/ M2 Fairshare $318,770.00
Santa Ana M2 Fairshare $351,276.50
$1,112,131.50
B. In-Kind Services
i. Specific Improvements (List items and Cost):

Agency Expenditure
Select a City
$0.00
ii. Staffing Commitment:

Agency Staff Position No. of Hours Fully Burdened
Hourly Rate Total*
Sr. Civil Engineer 60 $170.00 $10,200.00
Assistant Signal
Operations Engineer 120 $140.00 $16,800.00
Assistant Engineer 30 $100.00 $3,000.00
$0.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
Description
$1,142,131.50 $30,000.00
TOTAL CASH MATCH:

TOTAL MATCH
$1,112,131.50
Type of Service to Project
Project Oversight, Construction Engineering
Total Specific Improvements (i):
*Total amount is the required participation by the identified agency. The number of hours and hourly rate will be based on each agency’s actual fully burdened billing rates, which must collectively equal the same value of the assigned “Total” dollars. Each agency will be responsible for keeping detailed records of hours worked and description of work. An accounting record of personnel, hours at fully burdened rate shall be included with the in-kind report submittals. Records will be subject to auditing. In-kind match can be converted to Cash Match, but Cash Match cannot be converted to in-kind match.

Total for City of Santa Ana:

TOTAL IN-KIND MATCH* (i + ii):

Total Staffing Commitment (ii):

Anaheim
$130,655.00
Orange
$318,770.00 $0.00
$0.00
$318,770.00
Santa Ana
$351,276.50 $30,000.00 $381,276.50
PART 1: AGENCY TOTAL MATCH SUMMARY
PART 2: MATCH BREAKDOWN (CASH vs IN-KIND SERVICES)
Agency
Placentia
$191,950.00 $0.00
CASH
Brea
$119,480.00
TOTAL MATCH
$119,480.00
$191,950.00
$130,655.00 $0.00
IN‐KIND
Equipment configuration, installation and
integration/ Construction Engineering
Santa Ana
Equipment configuration, installation and
integration/ Construction Engineering
13 111

SECTION 6: PROJECT SCHEDULE BY TASK
Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
a.Projected Start and End Dates:

January 1, 2025
December 31, 2027
b.Projected Schedule by Task
Starting Date Ending Date
January 1, 2025 December 31, 2025
January 1, 2025 April 30, 2025
January 1, 2025 December 31, 2025
January 1, 2025 December 31, 2025
October 1, 2025 December 31, 2025
January 1, 2026 December 31, 2027
January 1, 2026 December 31, 2027
October 1, 2027 December 31, 2027
By checking this box, the Applicant Agency, on behalf of all the participating agencies, agree to implement this project within 12 months. (This means the project will be ineligible for delays and timely use funds extensions. This is not applicable to projects requesting OCTA to lead and Baseline Project participants.)
Project start date:

Project end date:

Task 8: Final Technical Memorandum
Task
Task 1: Project Management - PI Phase
Task 2: Data Collection
Task 3: System Design and Construction
Task 4: Signal Timing Optimization and Implementation
Task 5: Project Report
Task 6: Project Management - O&M Phase
Task 7: Continuing Support
14 112

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP

CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS
Appendix A
113

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Estimated
Points
Yes,
3 / 115 =
=10
=15
/=
=
61 =10
61 /61 =
=10
6 Yes,=5
Not =0
Not Implementing within 12 months = 0
/=
75 APPENDIX A: CALCULATIONS AND ESTIMATED POINTS
Total Estimated Points:

Calculation for Total Project Cost / VMT =
Participating Jurisdiction(s)
# of signals along entire length of corridor :
# of signals being synched / total # of corridor signals:

5. Number of Jurisdictions: (10 points)

6. Current Project Status (10 points)

4. Project Scale: (20 points)
$5,710,658
100.0%
$5,710,657.50
0 20.00%$1,142,131.50

7. Funding Match: (5 points)
Retiming 75% of previous project
25 10
5 1. Transportation Significance (25 points)
Inclusion of offset signals w/in 2,700'
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): 367,503
10 5
20 Average project improvement score 33.6
Timing 75% of new eligible project
All agencies are participating in the Countywide Baseline Project Criteria (Max Points)
# of offset signals on project / total # of offset signals : 100.0%

2. Economic Effectiveness (Cost to Benefit Ratio): (10 points)

3. Project Characteristics: (20 points)
367,503 15.54
114

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Appendix B

AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONS
115

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE I: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT PREFERENCESBrea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana Brea Placentia Anaheim Orange Santa Ana1 Above ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)$19,000 $13,000$1,900 $1,300Encom Radio, Fiber Switch & power supply, SFPsEncom Wireless Radio and Etherwan Ethernet Swich w/ SFPs2 Fiber Optic underground $10,000 $10,000 $5,000 $90,000 $19,000 $1,000 $1,000 $500 $9,000 $1,900Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Layer 3 HUB Switch w/ SFPs and Power SupplyReterminate Fiber Opitc Cable, Fiber Optic Ethernet Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Layer 3 HUB Switch w/ SFPs and Power SupplyEthernet Switch120 SMFO, conduit, Fiber Drop Cable, Splice enclosure, FPP/FDU, Fiber Switch, SFPs, Fiber Switch & power supply120 SMFO Fiber Optic Cable In Existing Conduit, Fiber Splicing (FDU and Splice Enclosure), Etherwan Switch w/ SFPs, Drop Cable, No 6E Pullbox 3 All other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)$8,000$800Fiber Switch & power supply, SFPs, Fiber Patch Panel 4 ATC signal controller $10,000 $8,000 $5,500 $7,000 $8,000 $1,000 $800 $550 $700 $800Qubic Commander w/ Scout SoftwareEconolite Cobalt w/ EOS SoftwareEconolite 2070 TS2 Type 1 w/ 1C board w/ EOS softwareEconolite Cobalt w/ ASC3 SoftwareEconolite Cobalt w/ EOS Software5 Signal cabinet on existing foundation $40,000 $24,000 $24,000 $38,000 $4,000 $2,400 $2,400 $3,800Type P44 Cubic Trafficware Cabinet Western Systems Type P+Western Systems Type P+Modify/extend existing foundation or use exitsing foundation as is, Econolite TS Type II P Cabinet6 Signal cabinet on new foundation $44,000 $60,000 $4,400 $6,000Western Systems Type P+ w/ Service and SCE Design FeeEconolite ATCC w/ Service and SCE Design Fee7 BBS/USP (attached)8 BBS/UPS on existing foundation $11,000$1,100Myers / Clary9 BBS/UPS on new foundationMyers / Clary10 CCTV $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $11,000 $8,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,100 $800Axis Q6000 + PTZ CameraBosch / COHU Axis Cohu Rise Axis 11 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts)12 Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)13 Vehicle detection + bicycle detection $40,000 $40,000 $24,000 $50,000 $4,000 $4,000 $2,400 $5,000Iteris Next Iteris Next EconoliteEconolite Vision or Iteris Apex14 Vehicle detection$40,000$4,000Iteris Next Gridsmart w/ mounting brackets15 Bicycle detection16 Pedestrian detection (audible) $12,000 $23,000 $12,000 $1,200 $2,300 $1,200Polara (iN2S APS System) Campbell APSPolara (iN2S APS System)17 Pedestrian detection18 Active transportation/pedestrian safety19 Transit Signal Priority20 EVP (hybrid or GPS) $15,000$12,000 $1,500 $1,200GTT Opticam GPS SystemGPS EVP21 EVP (infrared)22 Speed feedback signs (existing post)23 Speed feedback signs (new post)24 Signal Performance Monitoring $10,000 $1,500 $1,000Software, Licensing and ServerCentracs SPM25 Channelization26 Signal phasing improvement27 Central System (server, licenses, workstations) $30,000 $100,000 $75,000 $50,000 $50,000Synchro Green Central System Licenses, Etherwan Layer 3 Switch w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Dell WorkstationEtherwan Layer 3 w/ SFPs and Power Supply, Digital Watchdog VMS Server/ Licensing, Dell Server (Video/ Traff Mgt), Dell Workstations, Synchro License, IP Schematic, Server RackEconolite Centracs Software and ServerWorkstations (w/ monitors), Touchpanel, TMC Console; SwitchesDell Server, Milestone VMS Licenses, Dell Workstations28 Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)29 UPS for TMC $10,000$1,000Rack Mount UPS30 Timing Only31 Timing + Traffic Responsive (license only)32 Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only)33 Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only)Caltrans34 Caltrans Cooperative Agreement $2,500 $2,500 $2,500Cooperative Agreement and Data CollectionCooperative Agreement and Data CollectionCooperative AgreementUNIT PRICE (MATERIAL + LABOR) APPLICABLE DESIGN COST PER UNIT VENDOR/BRAND & ADDITIONAL NOTESITEM DESCRIPTIONIDSignal Timing OnlyTMC/TOCCATEGORIESCommField ElementsMinor Signal Op ImproveYesNo18116

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTIONAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionSignal Performance MonitoringCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Caltrans Cooperative Agreement12345610131416172427341 Brea Lambert Road11 112 Brea Birch Street11 113 Brea Orbiter Street11 14 Brea Birch Hills Mall111 15 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *16 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street11 117 Placentia Golden Avenue111 18 Placentia Patrician Lane11119 Placentia Bastanchury Road111 1110 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard2111 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue112 Placentia Madison Avenue1113 Placentia Alta Vista Street1111114 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)21 1 115 Placentia Hawaii Way116 Placentia Crowther Avenue117 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue11118 Anaheim La Jolla Street1111119 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue11111 120 Anaheim Coronado Street111 121 Anaheim Fire Signal1122 Anaheim La Palma Avenue11 21 123 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *124 Anaheim Frontera Street11111 125 Orange Riverdale Avenue11126 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue11127 Orange Lincoln Avenue11 128 Orange Fletcher Avenue11 129 Orange Meats Avenue11 130 Orange Grove Avenue11131 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue1133 Orange Katella Avenue134 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue1135 Orange Collins Avenue1136 Orange Walnut Avenue11 137 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive11 138 Orange Palm Avenue11 139 Orange La Veta Avenue111140 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *141 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *142 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue1111111LOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORK19117

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTIONAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionSignal Performance MonitoringCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Caltrans Cooperative Agreement1234561013141617242734LOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORK43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue11 144 Santa Ana 21st Street11 11145 Santa Ana 17th Street11 11146 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp11 147 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp11 1 148 Santa Ana Fruit Street111 149 Santa Ana OC Register11 150 Santa Ana 4th Street1 111151 Santa Ana 1st Street11152 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue1153 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue11111154 Santa Ana Century High School11 1155 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue1156 Santa Ana St Andrew Place11 1 157 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place11 158 Santa Ana Warner Avenue11159 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr11 160 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp11 161 Santa Ana Dyer Road11-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street112 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street113 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp11- Santa Ana TMC Improvements1- Placentia TMC Improvements1- Orange TMC Improvements11- Anaheim TMC Improvements1- Brea TMC Improvements1164524710715206102215 4QUANTITY TOTAL = 20118

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTION1 BreaLambert Road2 BreaBirch Street3 BreaOrbiter Street4 BreaBirch Hills Mall5 BreaImperial Highway (SR-90) *6 BreaButtonwood Drive/ Saturn Street7 Placentia Golden Avenue8 Placentia Patrician Lane9 Placentia Bastanchury Road10 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard11 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue12 Placentia Madison Avenue13 Placentia Alta Vista Street14 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)15 Placentia Hawaii Way16 Placentia Crowther Avenue17 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue18 Anaheim La Jolla Street19 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue20 Anaheim Coronado Street21 Anaheim Fire Signal22 Anaheim La Palma Avenue23 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *24 Anaheim Frontera Street25 Orange Riverdale Avenue26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue27 Orange Lincoln Avenue28 Orange Fletcher Avenue29 Orange Meats Avenue30 Orange Grove Avenue31 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue33 Orange Katella Avenue34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue35 Orange Collins Avenue36 Orange Walnut Avenue37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive38 Orange Palm Avenue39 Orange La Veta Avenue40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *42 Santa Ana Fairhaven AvenueLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSConstruction Management & Inspection Contingency15%10%7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 10,500.00$ 8,750.00$ 96,250.00$ 7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 10,500.00$ 8,750.00$ 96,250.00$ 6,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 82,500.00$ 10,000.00$ 100,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 12,500.00$ 137,500.00$ -$2,500.00$ -$-$2,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 70,000.00$ 10,500.00$ 8,750.00$ 96,250.00$ 6,200.00$ 62,000.00$ 9,300.00$ 7,750.00$ 85,250.00$ 7,200.00$ 72,000.00$ 10,800.00$ 9,000.00$ 99,000.00$ 9,400.00$ 94,000.00$ 14,100.00$ 11,750.00$ 129,250.00$ 2,800.00$ 28,000.00$ 4,200.00$ 3,500.00$ 38,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 2,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 11,400.00$ 114,000.00$ 17,100.00$ 14,250.00$ 156,750.00$ 6,800.00$ 68,000.00$ 10,200.00$ 8,500.00$ 93,500.00$ 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 1,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 1,250.00$ 13,750.00$ 6,200.00$ 62,000.00$ 9,300.00$ 7,750.00$ 85,250.00$ 6,850.00$ 68,500.00$ 10,275.00$ 8,562.50$ 94,187.50$ 7,850.00$ 78,500.00$ 11,775.00$ 9,812.50$ 107,937.50$ 5,850.00$ 58,500.00$ 8,775.00$ 7,312.50$ 80,437.50$ 1,550.00$ 15,500.00$ 2,325.00$ 1,937.50$ 21,312.50$ 6,450.00$ 64,500.00$ 9,675.00$ 8,062.50$ 88,687.50$ -$2,500.00$ -$-$2,500.00$ 7,850.00$ 78,500.00$ 11,775.00$ 9,812.50$ 107,937.50$ 5,300.00$ 53,000.00$ 7,950.00$ 6,625.00$ 72,875.00$ 5,300.00$ 53,000.00$ 7,950.00$ 6,625.00$ 72,875.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 11,600.00$ 116,000.00$ 17,400.00$ 14,500.00$ 159,500.00$ 13,500.00$ 135,000.00$ 20,250.00$ 16,875.00$ 185,625.00$ -$-$-$-$-$ 2,600.00$ 26,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,250.00$ 35,750.00$ 1,900.00$ 19,000.00$ 2,850.00$ 2,375.00$ 26,125.00$ 2,600.00$ 26,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,250.00$ 35,750.00$ 2,600.00$ 26,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,250.00$ 35,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 6,600.00$ 66,000.00$ 9,900.00$ 8,250.00$ 90,750.00$ 7,700.00$ 77,000.00$ 11,550.00$ 9,625.00$ 105,875.00$ -$2,500.00$ -$-$2,500.00$ -$2,500.00$ -$-$2,500.00$ 16,200.00$ 163,500.00$ 24,525.00$ 20,422.50$ 224,647.50$ NOTESDesign ConstructionTOTALSIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS21119

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE II: DESCRIPTION OF WORK BY INTERSECTIONLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue44 Santa Ana 21st Street45 Santa Ana 17th Street46 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp47 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp48 Santa Ana Fruit Street49 Santa Ana OC Register50 Santa Ana 4th Street51 Santa Ana 1st Street52 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue53 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue54 Santa Ana Century High School55 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue56 Santa Ana St Andrew Place57 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place58 Santa Ana Warner Avenue59 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr60 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp61 Santa Ana Dyer Road-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street2 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp- Santa Ana TMC Improvements- Placentia TMC Improvements- Orange TMC Improvements- Anaheim TMC Improvements- Brea TMC ImprovementsQUANTITY TOTAL = Construction Management & Inspection Contingency15%10%NOTESDesign ConstructionTOTALSIGNAL IMPROVEMENT COSTS2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 8,900.00$ 90,500.00$ 13,575.00$ 11,297.50$ 124,272.50$ 8,900.00$ 90,500.00$ 13,575.00$ 11,297.50$ 124,272.50$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 4,000.00$ 41,500.00$ 6,225.00$ 5,172.50$ 56,897.50$ 8,700.00$ 88,500.00$ 13,275.00$ 11,047.50$ 121,522.50$ 2,100.00$ 22,500.00$ 3,375.00$ 2,797.50$ 30,772.50$ 7,800.00$ 79,500.00$ 11,925.00$ 9,922.50$ 109,147.50$ 8,100.00$ 81,000.00$ 12,150.00$ 10,125.00$ 111,375.00$ 1,900.00$ 20,500.00$ 3,075.00$ 2,547.50$ 28,022.50$ 14,900.00$ 150,500.00$ 22,575.00$ 18,797.50$ 206,772.50$ 3,900.00$ 40,500.00$ 6,075.00$ 5,047.50$ 55,522.50$ 2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,050.00$ 3,375.00$ 37,125.00$ 3,500.00$ 36,500.00$ 5,475.00$ 4,547.50$ 50,022.50$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 8,700.00$ 87,000.00$ 13,050.00$ 10,875.00$ 119,625.00$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 2,700.00$ 28,500.00$ 4,275.00$ 3,547.50$ 39,022.50$ 1,900.00$ 20,500.00$ 3,075.00$ 2,547.50$ 28,022.50$ -$-$-$-$-$ 12,800.00$ 128,000.00$ 19,200.00$ 16,000.00$ 176,000.00$ 2,100.00$ 21,000.00$ 3,150.00$ 2,625.00$ 28,875.00$ 2,700.00$ 27,000.00$ 4,050.00$ 3,375.00$ 37,125.00$ -$50,000.00$ 7,500.00$ 5,750.00$ 63,250.00$ -$100,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 11,500.00$ 126,500.00$ 1,900.00$ 69,000.00$ 10,350.00$ 8,125.00$ 89,375.00$ -$75,000.00$ 11,250.00$ 8,625.00$ 94,875.00$ -$30,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 3,450.00$ 37,950.00$ 5,236,457.50$ SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT TOTAL = 22120

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORESAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationBBS/USP (attached)BBS/UPS on existing foundationBBS/UPS on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts)Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)Vehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionBicycle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionActive transportation/pedestrian safetyTransit Signal PriorityEVP (hybrid or GPS)EVP (infrared)Speed feedback signs (existing post)Speed feedback signs (new post)Signal Performance MonitoringChannelizationSignal phasing improvementCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)UPS for TMC1 Brea Lambert Road15 50 30 302 Brea Birch Street15 50 30 303 Brea Orbiter Street15 50 304 Brea Birch Hills Mall15 50 30 305 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street15 50 30 307 Placentia Golden Avenue15 50 15308 Placentia Patrician Lane15 30 30 509 Placentia Bastanchury Road15 50 30 30 5010 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard15 5011 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue1512 Placentia Madison Avenue15 3013 Placentia Alta Vista Street15 50 15 30 5014 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)15 50 30 3015 Placentia Hawaii Way1516 Placentia Crowther Avenue1517 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue15 50 1518 Anaheim La Jolla Street15 50 30 30 3019 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue15 50 30 30 304020 Anaheim Coronado Street15 50 30 3021 Anaheim Fire Signal504022 Anaheim La Palma Avenue15 50 30 304023 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *24 Anaheim Frontera Street15 50 30 30 304025 Orange Riverdale Avenue1503026 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue1503027 Orange Lincoln Avenue30 50 3028 Orange Fletcher Avenue30 50 3029 Orange Meats Avenue30 15 5030 Orange Grove Avenue15 50 3031 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue30 5033 Orange Katella Avenue3034 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue30 5035 Orange Collins Avenue30 5036 Orange Walnut Avenue30 50 3037 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive30 50 3038 Orange Palm Avenue30 50 30 5039 Orange La Veta Avenue30 50 30 3040 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *42 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue30 15 50 15 30 50 40LOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORKTime Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/5+ or <5 0/10+ or < 1023121

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORESAbove ground (e.g. wireless, cellular, etc.)Fiber Optic undergroundAll other (e.g. copper, aerial fiber, GPS, etc.)ATC signal controllerSignal cabinet on existing foundationSignal cabinet on new foundationBBS/USP (attached)BBS/UPS on existing foundationBBS/UPS on new foundationCCTVVehicle detection (ATSPM inputs + counts)Vehicle detection (ATSPM inputs)Vehicle detection + bicycle detectionVehicle detectionBicycle detectionPedestrian detection (audible)Pedestrian detectionActive transportation/pedestrian safetyTransit Signal PriorityEVP (hybrid or GPS)EVP (infrared)Speed feedback signs (existing post)Speed feedback signs (new post)Signal Performance MonitoringChannelizationSignal phasing improvementCentral System (server, licenses, workstations)Display (video wall, VMS, etc.)UPS for TMCLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSDESCRIPTION OF WORKTime Source None/5+ Years or Within 5 Years 0/5+ or <5 0/10+ or < 1043 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue15 504044 Santa Ana 21st Street15 50 30 50 4045 Santa Ana 17th Street15 50 30 50 4046 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp15 504047 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp30 15 504048 Santa Ana Fruit Street15 50 154049 Santa Ana OC Register30 504050 Santa Ana 4th Street50 30 30 50 4051 Santa Ana 1st Street1530 5052 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue154053 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue15 50 15 30 50 4054 Santa Ana Century High School15 5050 4055 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue15 3056 Santa Ana St Andrew Place15 50 304057 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place15 504058 Santa Ana Warner Avenue15 15 3059 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr15 504060 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp15 504061 Santa Ana Dyer Road154000-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street15 302 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street30 503 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp15 50- Santa Ana TMC Improvements40- Placentia TMC Improvements40- Orange TMC Improvements3040- Anaheim TMC Improvements40- Brea TMC Improvements4024122

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORES1 Brea Lambert Road2 Brea Birch Street3 Brea Orbiter Street4 Brea Birch Hills Mall5 Brea Imperial Highway (SR-90) *6 Brea Buttonwood Drive/ Saturn Street7 Placentia Golden Avenue8 Placentia Patrician Lane9 Placentia Bastanchury Road10 Placentia Yorba Linda Boulevard11 Placentia Sheffield Street/Morse Avenue12 Placentia Madison Avenue13 Placentia Alta Vista Street14 Placentia Chapman Avenue (North)15 Placentia Hawaii Way16 Placentia Crowther Avenue17 Placentia Orangethorpe Avenue18 Anaheim La Jolla Street19 Anaheim Miraloma Avenue20 Anaheim Coronado Street21 Anaheim Fire Signal22 Anaheim La Palma Avenue23 Anaheim SR-91 Westbound Off-Ramp *24 Anaheim Frontera Street25 Orange Riverdale Avenue26 Orange Riverbend Parkway/Richland Avenue27 Orange Lincoln Avenue28 Orange Fletcher Avenue29 Orange Meats Avenue30 Orange Grove Avenue31 Orange Orange Olive Road32 Orange Taft Avenue33 Orange Katella Avenue34 Orange Wilson Avenue/Adams Avenue35 Orange Collins Avenue36 Orange Walnut Avenue37 Orange Sycamore Avenue/University Drive38 Orange Palm Avenue39 Orange La Veta Avenue40 Orange SR-22 Westbound Ramp *41 Orange SR-22 Eastbound Ramp *42 Santa Ana Fairhaven AvenueLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETSTiming OnlyTiming + Traffic Responsive (license only)Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only)Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only)Caltrans Cooperative AgreementY/N31.331.331.731.35050.031.327.531.335.032.515.022.532.031.315.015.026.731.032.531.345.033.05050.032.527.027.036.736.731.731.740.030.040.040.036.736.740.035.05050.05050.032.9NOTESAVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCOREOnline or Offline25123

APPENDIX B: AGENCY IMPROVEMENT CALCULATIONSKraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSPTABLE III: PROJECT AVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCORESLOCATIONIMPLEMENTING AGENCYPROJECT CROSS STREETS43 Santa Ana Santa Clara Avenue44 Santa Ana 21st Street45 Santa Ana 17th Street46 Santa Ana I-5 Northbound Ramp47 Santa Ana Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 Southbound Ramp48 Santa Ana Fruit Street49 Santa Ana OC Register50 Santa Ana 4th Street51 Santa Ana 1st Street52 Santa Ana Chestnut Avenue53 Santa Ana McFadden Avenue54 Santa Ana Century High School55 Santa Ana Edinger Avenue56 Santa Ana St Andrew Place57 Santa Ana St Gertrude Place58 Santa Ana Warner Avenue59 Santa Ana Hotel Terrace Drive/Brookhollow Dr60 Santa Ana SR-55 Southbound Off-Ramp61 Santa Ana Dyer Road00-1 Orange Taft Avenue & Shaffer Street2 Santa Ana Fairhaven Avenue & Cambridge Street3 Santa Ana Santa Ana Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramp- Santa Ana TMC Improvements- Placentia TMC Improvements- Orange TMC Improvements- Anaheim TMC Improvements- Brea TMC ImprovementsTiming OnlyTiming + Traffic Responsive (license only)Timing + Peer-to-Peer (configuration only)Timing + Traffic Adaptive (license only)Caltrans Cooperative AgreementY/NNOTESAVERAGE IMPROVEMENT SCOREOnline or Offline35.037.037.035.033.830.040.040.031.727.533.338.822.533.835.020.035.035.027.522.540.032.540.040.035.040.040.033.6AVERAGE SCORE = 26124

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Appendix C

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)
125

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
APPENDIX C: VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)
ADTs Distance VMT
13,036 0.40 5,214
16,463 0.50 8,232
16,397 0.50 8,199
16,052 0.50 8,026
18,362 0.60 11,017
20,952 0.80 16,762
18,905 0.40 7,562
18,932 0.42 7,951
Anaheim 45,665 1.70 77,631
20,900 0.45 9,405
16,200 0.46 7,452
16,500 0.94 15,510
21,900 0.46 10,074
15,500 0.46 7,130
8,900 0.50 4,450
7,900 0.50 3,950
13,200 0.50 6,600
29,100 0.34 9,894
29,300 0.16 4,688
27,641 0.43 11,886
24,397 0.50 12,199
28,732 0.39 11,205
44,763 0.61 27,305
37,067 0.84 31,136
28,319 0.48 13,593
24,644 0.75 18,483
21,727 0.55 11,950

15.14 367,503
Edinger Ave - Warner Ave
Warner Ave - Dyer Rd
Katella Ave - Collins Ave
Chapman Ave (South) - La Veta Ave
La Veta Ave - SR-22 Fwy
SR-22 Fwy - Fairhaven Ave
Collins Ave - Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave - Chapman Ave (South)
McFadden Ave - Edinger Ave
Fairhaven Ave - Santa Clara Ave
Santa Clara Ave - 17th St
1st St - McFadden Ave
Source: 2023 - Brea, Placentia, Anaheim 2022 - Santa Ana, Orange Total Project VMT:

Segment
Imperial Hwy (SR-90) - Golden Ave
Golden Ave - Bastanchury Rd
Yorba Linda Blvd - Alta Vista St
Lambert Rd - Birch St
Birch St - Imperial Hwy (SR-90)
Lincoln Ave - Fletcher Ave
Taft Ave - Katella Ave
Alta Vista St - Chapman Ave (North)
Chapman Ave (North) - Orangethorpe Ave
Orangethorpe Ave - Riverdale AvePlacentia
OrangeSanta AnaBreaRiverdale Ave - Lincoln Ave
Bastanchury Rd - Yorba Linda Blvd
Fletcher Ave - Taft Ave
17th St - Santa Ana Blvd/ I-5 Fwy
I-5 Fwy - 1st St
126

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP

AGENCY RESOLUTIONS AND LETTERS OF SUPPORT
Appendix D
127

Kraemer Boulevard/ Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue RTSSP
Appendix E
Cabinet photos and As-built drawings (Uploaded to
OCFundTracker and included in Electronic Submittal Only) 128

Agenda Item No: 1.f

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Alice Burnett
From: Administrative Services
Subject:

Resolution appointing retired annuitant Daylene Alliman as a temporary Human Resources Analyst to perform work of a limited duration under Government Code Sections 75522.56 and 21224
Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact:

The Human Resources Analyst is a regularly allocated position within the City's budget. The costs associated with a temporary Human Resources Analyst can be covered in the current year's FY 2024-25 budget.

Summary:

The Human Resources Division is experiencing an increased workload due to a significant number of ongoing recruitments. To ensure that these recruitments are conducted efficiently and effectively, there is a need for additional temporary support. Hiring a retired annuitant with extensive experience in human resources and recruitment processes will help address this need. The attached resolution for this appointment complies with Government Code Sections 7522.56 and 21224.

Recommendation:

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council:

It is recommended that the City Council Adopt Resolution of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California Certifying the Human Resources Analyst Classification as a critically needed position and appointing Daylene Alliman as a temporary Human Resources Analyst Pursuant to Government Code Sections 75522.56 and 21224 Strategic Plan Statement:

There is no specific strategic planning goal or objective associated with this agenda item.

Discussion:

The Human Resources Division is experiencing an increased workload due to a significant number of ongoing recruitments, including the recruitment for a new Human Resources Analyst. Currently there are 17 full-time vacancies in critical positions in Public Works, Community Services, Police, and Public Safety Communications. Critical part-time recruitments related to summer programming are also scheduled to begin this month. It is also anticipated that attrition due to retirements will affect our Police Department this year and 129

having active eligibility lists will assist in filling our safety sensitive positions in a timely manner.

To ensure that these recruitments are conducted efficiently and effectively, there is a need for additional temporary support. Hiring a retired annuitant with extensive experience in human resources and recruitment processes will help address this need.

The proposed candidate for the temporary Human Resources Analyst position is Daylene Alliman, a retired annuitant with over 25 years of experience in human resources. Ms. Alliman has worked in similar Limited-Term Human Resources Analyst roles and has extensive knowledge of local government Human Resources operations. The City needs a temporary Human Resources Analyst with sufficient knowledge and expertise and the City cannot temporarily appoint another employee without impairing City operations. Given the current circumstances, Staff is recommending that the City Council approve a resolution certifying the Human Resources Analyst position as critically needed and authorizing the temporary appointment of the Human Resources Analyst to provide extra-help as a retired annuitant on a temporary, post-retirement basis. Staff anticipates that the appointment will not exceed a three (3) month period, working approximately 20-30 hours per week.

Ms. Alliman is a retired annuitant under the CalPERS retirement system. Under California public employment retirement law that governs public sector retirees, a retired annuitant may be employed by a public agency if it meets certain criteria. Government Code Sections 75522.56 and 21221(h) requires public agencies meet all of the requirements, such as:

The temporary appointment to the Human Resources Analyst position requires critical and highly specialized skills by the governing body.

The City requires an experienced Human Resources Analyst to assist with attracting, recruiting and hiring to fill vacant positions.

The City requires the "extra-help" from a retired annuitant professional to perform the duties of a Human Resources Analyst under Government Code 21224.

The temporary appointment by the governing body must be of limited duration, not to exceed 960 hours per fiscal year for all employers.

The appointed retiree shall not receive any benefits, incentives, compensation in lieu of benefits, or any other forms of compensation in addition to the hourly rate.

This appointment is limited to 960 hours per fiscal year and the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor more than the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties. This position is categorized as a temporary Human Resources Analyst and does not include any other benefit, incentive or compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation in addition to the $46.79 hourly rate, with the exception of statutorily required Medicare.

It is anticipated that, if approved by City Council, Ms. Alliman will begin after February 5, 2025, subject to confirmation from CalPERS that Ms. Alliman may be appointed as an extra-help retired annuitant.

Fiscal Impact Summary:

The Human Resources Analyst is a regularly allocated position within the City's budget. the costs associated with a temporary Human Resources Analyst can be covered in the current year's FY 2024-25 budget.

Attachments
130

Resolution_NO_R-2025-04_Daylene_Alliman.docx
131

Resolution R-2025-04

RESOLUTION NO. R–2025–04

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE

HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST CLASSIFICATION AS A

CRITICALLY NEEDED POSITION AND APPOINTING

DAYLENE ALLIMAN AS A TEMPORARY HUMAN

RESOURCES ANALYST PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTIONS 75522.56 AND 21224

RECITALS
WHEREAS Government Code section 21224 of the Public Employees’ Retirement Law permits the governing body to appoint a CalPERS retiree to a vacant position requiring specialized skills for performing ‘extra work’ of a limited duration, and provides that such appointment will not subject the retired person to reinstatement from retirement or loss of benefits so long as it is a single appointment that does not exceed 960 hours in a fiscal year; and,
WHEREAS the City Council desires to appoint Daylene Alliman (“Appointee”) as a temporary appointment retired annuitant to the vacant position of Human Resources Analyst for the City of Placentia under Gov. Code section 21224, effective February 5, 2025; and, WHEREAS, under Government Code section 21224, the City can appoint a retired annuitant of CalPERS to work in a vacant position during an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business; and, WHEREAS this appointment pursuant to Gov. Code section 21224 shall end once (1) ‘extra work” is no longer needed, or (2) until Appointee works her 960th hour for any CalPERS agency during the 2024- 2025 or 2025-2026 fiscal years, or (3) upon termination of this employment by Appointee or the City; and, WHEREAS consistent with the Government Code, compensation shall be $46.79 per hour which is within the current established salary range for Human Resources Analyst and will not include any benefits, nor accrued vacation or leave time, or any other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and,
WHEREAS the City Council and Appointee certify that Appointee has not and will not receive a “golden handshake” agreement, as described in Government Code 20903, or any other retirement-related incentive.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

The City Council finds that the appointment of Appointee to the Human Resources Analyst position, commencing on February 5, 2025, is necessary to fill a critically needed position for the City of Placentia because of the need for her specialized skills to perform critical work of a limited duration.

PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 4
th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025.
_____________________________
Kevin Kirwin, Mayor
132

Resolution R-2025-04

ATTEST:
____________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on the 4 th day of February
by the following vote:

AYES:Councilmembers:

NOES:Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
_____________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Christian Bettenhausen, City Attorney
133

Agenda Item No: 2.a

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Margie McCoy
From: Development Services
Subject:

An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California amending Chapter 10.56 “Graffiti” of Title 10 “Peace, Morals and Safety” of the Placentia Municipal Code relating to the prevention, enforcement, and abatement of graffiti, and recovering costs related thereto Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact:

No immediate impact. Potential for increased revenue.

Summary:

This Ordinance would amend Placentia Municipal Code (PMC) Chapter 10.56 (“Graffiti”) to add additional language to Section 10.56.010 “Intent and purpose”, to add definitions of “Minor” and “Responsible Party” to Section 10.56.020, to add requirements to Section

10.56.060 to store graffiti (implements) only in areas where general public can only access with employee assistance; to add enforcement tools for recovering the City’s cost of abating graffiti Section 10.56.070; to add language encouraging and/or requiring the use of graffiti- resistant coatings, faux or live landscaping or other techniques approved by the Development Services Director or designee to Standard Conditions of Approval for new developments.

Recommendation:

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Open the Public Hearing concerning Ordinance No. O-2025-01, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Placentia, California amending Sections 10.56.010, 10.56.020,

10.56.060, and 10.56.070 (Chapter 10.56 “Graffiti” of Title 10 “Peace, Morals and Safety”) relating to the prevention, enforcement, and abatement of graffiti, and recovering costs related thereto; and

2. Receive the Staff Report and consider all Public Testimony; and

3. Close the Public Hearing; and

4. Waive full reading, by title only, and introduce and adopt Ordinance No. O-2025-01, amending PMC Title 10 related to graffiti abatement.

Strategic Plan Statement:

This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5-Year Strategic Goal No. 4, to Increase Community Engagement, specifically Objective No. 4.7 Police, which is to Conduct Community Oriented Policing and Proactive Policing (i.e. Neighborhood Watch, Community Watch, etc.). This agenda item utilizes proactive policies for Policing and Code Enforcement. 134

Discussion:

The City desires to provide notice to all persons that the City intends to strictly enforce local and state laws pertaining to the vandalism of property by graffiti. This includes, but is not limited to, California Penal Code Sections 594, 594.1, 640.5 and 640.6, California Vehicle Code Section 13202.6, and Chapter 10.56 of the Municipal Code.

The additional language in the “Intent and Purpose” section explains why proactive enforcement is important. Graffiti has been found to be associated with criminal activity and delinquency. It is also a means of identification and intimidation utilized by gangs and its presence may further illegal gang-related activities.

The acts of graffiti vandalism are most often committed by persons under the age of 18, using aerosol spray paint and other implements that are often stolen from retail stores. To make these graffiti implements less accessible to minors and to provide retail stores greater protection from theft of these items, the City will require additional steps to prevent easy theft of implements most commonly used in committing graffiti related crimes.

In an effort to make theft of these graffiti implements more difficult, the Ordinance seeks to place them in enclosures behind the counter or in locked cabinets rather than open display shelving. To aid in the enforcement against graffiti vandalism by minors, the Ordinance holds jointly responsible the parents or guardians of the minors who commit these crimes, with escalating consequences for repeat offenses within certain time frames. The Ordinance provides for possible treble damages, civil litigation, and/or criminal prosecution as enforcement options.

Background:

The presence of graffiti creates fear within the community and blight upon the landscape and detracts from a sense of community enjoyed by the residents of the City of Placentia. The detrimental effects of graffiti go beyond the cost of clean-up and removal and there is currently no mechanism within the Ordinance to hold parents or legal guardians accountable for violations committed by persons under 18 years of age, nor can the City recover the costs of graffiti removal after such violations committed by minors.

While the City desires to provide mechanisms for the easy removal of graffiti in the future for property identified to be prone to repeated graffiti defacement, the City also desires to provide for the ability to enforce our regulations against these minor persons committing acts of graffiti within the City and to recover the costs incurred by the City in the abatement thereof.

Additionally, the City would require future developments to incorporate a mechanism to deter graffiti by using graffiti-resistant coatings, faux landscaping affixed to the vertical surface, live landscaping or other techniques approved by the Development Services Director or designee.

Fiscal Impact Summary:

No immediate impact. Potential for increased revenue.

Attachments
Placentia_Ordinance_Graffiti_Amend_Ch_10_56_rev_4.docx
135

Ordinance O-2025-01

ORDINANCE NO. O-2025-01

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS

10.56.010, 10.56.020, 10.56.060, and 10.56.070 (CHAPTER

10.56 “GRAFFITI” OF TITLE 10 “PEACE, MORALS AND
SAFETY”)RELATING TO THE PREVENTION,

ENFORCEMENT, AND ABATEMENT OF GRAFFITI, AND
RECOVERING COSTS RELATED THERETO.

City Attorney Summary
This Ordinance would amend Chapter 10.56 (“Graffiti”) to add additional language to Section 10.56.010 “Intent and purpose”, to add definitions of “Minor” and “Responsible Party” to Section 10.56.020, to add requirements to Section 10.56.060 to store graffiti implements only in areas where the general public can only access with employee assistance; to add enforcement tools for recovering the City’s cost of abating graffiti to Section

10.56.070.

A.Recitals
(i)Chapter 10.56 “Graffiti” was added to the Placentia Municipal Code in 1993 and amended from time to time thereafter.
(ii)Acts of graffiti are destructive of the rights and values of private property owners as well as of the entire community.
(iii) The presence of graffiti creates fear within the community and blights upon the landscape and detracts from a sense of community enjoyed by the residents of the City of Placentia (“City”).
(iv) The detrimental effects of graffiti go beyond the cost of clean-up or removal. (v) There currently is no mechanism within the ordinance to hold accountable the parents or legal guardians for violations committed by persons under 18 years of age or recover the costs of graffiti removal after such violation by minors. (vi)The City desires to provide for the ability to enforce the ordinance against these minor persons committing acts of graffiti within the City and to recover costs incurred by the city in the abatement thereof.
(vii) The City desires to provide mechanisms for the easy removal of graffiti in the future for property identified to be prone to repeated graffiti defacement. 136

Ordinance O-2025-01

B.Ordinance
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Placentia does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 10.56.010 of Chapter 10.56 (Graffiti) of Title 10 (Peace, Morals and Safety) is hereby amended as follows:
§ 10.56.010. Intent and purpose.

It is the intent and purpose of the city council, of the city through the adoption of this chapter, to provide additional enforcement tools beyond those set forth in Chapter 8.06 of the Placentia Municipal Code to protect public and private property from the acts of vandalism and defacement especially, but not limited to graffiti on privately and publicly owned walls, which are inimical and destructive of the rights and values of private property owners as well as the total community.

It is further the intent of the city council, through the adoption of this chapter, to give notice to all who disregard the property rights of others that the city will strictly enforce all laws prohibiting graffiti, including but not limited to California Penal Code Sections 594, 594.1, 640.5 and 640.6, California Vehicle Code Section 13202.6, and the provisions of this chapter.

Graffiti has been found to be associated with criminal activity and delinquency. It is also a means of identification and intimidation utilized by gangs and its presence may further gang-related activities.

The power of graffiti to create fear within the community and blight upon the landscape, devaluing property and detracting from the sense of community enjoyed by the residents of Placentia, goes beyond the cost of clean-up or removal and is such that the city council finds it necessary to enact regulations for the display, sale and possession of graffiti implements and to provide for a reward, under certain circumstances, for information leading to the arrest and conviction of any person for violation of this chapter.

Not only is graffiti a criminal act of vandalism, but it is also a social crime upon the quality of life and freedom from intimidation that residents desire in their neighborhoods.

Acts of graffiti are most often committed by persons under the age of 18 years using aerosol containers of spray paint or felt-tip markers, or both. These implements of graffiti are frequently stolen from retail stores by minors, and, as such, retail stores that display or sell these implements should be required to take reasonable steps to prevent their theft.

California Government Code Section 53069.3 authorizes the City, under certain circumstances, to provide for the removal of graffiti and other inscribed materials from private as well as public property. Unless the City causes graffiti to be removed from 137

Ordinance O-2025-01

public and private property, it tends to remain. Other properties then become the target of graffiti with the result that the entire neighborhood is affected and becomes a less desirable place in which to be.

SECTION 2. Section 10.56.020 of Chapter 10.56 (Graffiti) of Title 10 (Peace, Morals and Safety) is hereby amended to add the following:
"Minor" means any person under 18 years of age.
"Responsible party" means any person who owns, possesses, occupies, or otherwise has responsibility for the repair or maintenance of personal or real property on which there exists graffiti. Responsible party shall also include any minor (or parent or guardian of a minor) or other person who causes or permits the application of graffiti or other inscribed material. Responsible party shall also include the City within the scope and meaning of Subsection (k)(5) of California Penal Code Section 1202.4 when the graffiti occurs on the City's property or when the graffiti occurs on public or private property that is not owned by the City and the City, after notice to the property owner, undertakes to clean up the graffiti on private property
SECTION 3. Section 10.56.060 of Chapter 10.56 (Graffiti) of Title 10 (Peace, Morals and Safety) is hereby amended to read as follows:
§ 10.56.060. Storage or display of aerosol paint containers and marking pens.

It shall be unlawful and a misdemeanor for any person or business engaged in a commercial enterprise to display for sale, trade, loan, or exchange any graffiti implement except in an area from which the public shall be securely precluded from entering without employee assistance. Two such acceptable methods for displaying graffiti implements for sale shall be by containment in (1) a completely enclosed cabinet or other storage device which shall be permanently affixed to a building or structure, and which shall, at all times except during access by authorized representatives, remain securely locked; or (2) in an enclosed area behind a sales or service counter from which the public is precluded from entry.

Nothing herein shall relieve such person or business entity from, at all times, complying with the requirements of the California Penal Code Section 594.1(c) by posting signs as described therein
It is the intent of this section to permit, but not to require viewability of aerosol paint containers and felt-tip markers or marking pens, where they are stored or displayed, pending retail sale.
138

Ordinance O-2025-01

SECTION 4.Section 10.56.070 of Chapter 10.56 (Graffiti) of Title 10 (Peace, Morals and Safety) is hereby amended to add the following:
(c) …
(3) Conditions on Discretionary Approvals. In imposing conditions upon use permits, variances, building permits to the extent permitted by this code, or other similar land use entitlements or development or design applications, the city may impose graffiti removal requirements or any or all of the following conditions, or other similar or related conditions:
(A)Use of Anti-Graffiti Material. The applicant shall apply an anti- graffiti materialof a type and nature that is acceptable to the city tothosepublicly viewable surfaces to be constructed on the site deemed by the city to be likely to attract graffiti (graffiti attracting surfaces).; To enhance the visual appearance of the structure while discouraging vandalism, any new or modified block wall or building with unobstructed access which abuts the public right-of-way, watershed channel, railway, or public alley must incorporate a mechanism to deter graffiti, which may be one or more of the following methods: graffiti-resistant coatings, faux landscaping affixed to the vertical surface, live landscaping, or another technique approved by the Development Services
Director or designee.
(B)Right of Access to Remove Graffiti. The applicant, as a condition of approval, shall grant, in writing, the right of entry over and access to such parcels, upon 48 hours posted notice, by authorized city employees or agents, for the purpose of removing or painting over graffiti on graffiti attracting surfaces previously designated by the city. Such grant shall be made an express condition of approval and shall be deemed to run with the land and shall include provisions for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred by the city in such abatement activities.; (C)Supply City With Graffiti-Removal Material. The applicant, and any and all successors in interest, shall, for a specified period of years after approval, provide the city with sufficient matching paint and/or anti- graffiti material on demand for use in the painting over or removal of designated graffiti attracting surfaces.;
(D)Immediate Removal of Graffiti. Persons applying for
subdivision or parcel maps shall, as part of any conditions, covenants and restrictions, covenant, which covenant shall run with the land, in a form satisfactory to the city, that the owners of the lots shall immediately remove any publicly viewable graffiti to the city's satisfaction.
139

Ordinance O-2025-01

(E)Repeat Graffiti Locations. For private property structures that a Code Enforcement Officer or Police Officer has identified as being prone to repeated graffiti, the property owner must utilize graffiti-resistance coatings, faux landscaping affixed to the vertical surface, live landscaping, or another technique approved by the Development Services Director or their
designee in order to enhance the visual appearance of the structure while discouraging vandalism.
(d) Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1714.1(b) and Government Code Sections 38772, 38773.2, and 38773.6, the city council hereby makes the expense of abatement of graffiti violations of law committed by minor a personal obligation of both the minor causing the graffiti nuisance and the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) having custody and control of the minor (who shall be jointly and severally liable with the minor), and an assessment against the property of the minor or an assessment against the property of the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) having custody and control of the minor.

Pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1714.1(b) and Government Code Sections 38772, 38773.2, and 38773.6, each parent or legal guardian having custody and control of a minor who places graffiti on any public or privately owned structure, building, or property, including natural and manmade objects within the City, shall be jointly and severally liable with such minor for any and all costs incurred in connection with the removal of any graffiti caused by the minor, including all abatement costs, attorney's fees, court costs, removal costs, costs of repair and/or replacement, and the law enforcement costs incurred by the City in identifying and apprehending the minor.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 38773.7, upon a second or subsequent civil or criminal judgment within a two-year period, the city may find that the minor causing the graffiti nuisance and the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) having custody and control of the minor is responsible for the graffiti and request the court to impose treble damages.

Such liability shall be a personal obligation of each parent or guardian and shall constitute a lien or special assessment on property owned by each parent or guardian pursuant to Section 10.56.110 of this chapter. The City is authorized to initiate legal action to enforce this section, or to recover these costs by any other means provided by law.

The liability of each parent or guardian shall not exceed $37,000, or any future amount set by the California Judicial Council in accordance with California Civil Code Section 1714.1(c).

Disposition of criminal prosecution relating to placement of graffiti does not preclude the City from seeking full cost recovery as provided herein. 140

Ordinance O-2025-01

SECTION 5. Environmental Compliance: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and State CEQA guidelines (Sections 15000 et seq.) the ordinance is not a "project" and further, that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ordinance in question may have a significant effect on the environment, either directly or indirectly, and that therefore no environmental review under the CEQA is required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).

SECTION 6.Severability: If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed severable and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The Mayor and City Council of the City of Placentia hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed, and the balance of the ordinance be enforced.

SECTION 7. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same, or the summary thereof, to be published and posted pursuant to the provisions of law and this Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia held on 4th day of February 2025.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of February 2025. _________________________________
Kevin Kirwin, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE I, Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk of the City of Placentia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the 4th day of February 2025 and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Placentia, held on the XX day of February 2025 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
141

Ordinance O-2025-01

ATTEST:
_________________________________
Robert S. McKinnell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________
Christian L. Bettenhausen, City Attorney
142

Agenda Item No: 3.a

PLACENTIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Meeting Date: February 4, 2025
Submitted by: Nicolette Drulias
From: City Administrator
Subject:

Appointments to the Centennial Steering Committee for the City's upcoming Centennial in 2026
Financial Impact:

Fiscal Impact:

At this time there is no fiscal impact associated with the creation of the Committee.

Summary:

On November 19, 2024, the City Council authorized the formation of a Centennial Steering Committee (the "Committee") to assist City staff in planning for the City's upcoming Centennial celebration in 2026. The City will celebrate its centennial on December 2, 2026, and plans to celebrate all year long with centennial-themed events, merchandise, a new City logo and updated branding, community involvement, and a special birthday party celebration in December 2026. In order to promote community involvement and ensure we include unique community events and programs for this celebration, Staff recommended the establishment of a Committee comprised of different City organizations, non-profits, and recognized community groups. The Committee will split off into Subcommittees working with Staff and other members to prepare recommendations for programming, events, and other items associated with the centennial celebrations.

The Committee will be comprised of nineteen (19) members: two (2) City Council Members; one (1) appointed from each of the five (5) City Council districts; one (1) member from Kiwanis Club of Placentia; one (1) member from the Placentia Library; one (1) member from the Rotary Club of Placentia; one (1) member from the Women's Round Table; one (1) member from the Placentia Yorba Linda Unified School District; one (1) member from the Veterans Advisory Committee; one (1) member from the Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association; one (1) member from the Placentia Chamber of Commerce; one (1) member from the Senior Advisory Committee; one (1) member from the Heritage Festival Committee; two (2) members from the Historical Committee. City Staff members will serve as facilitators/liaisons for the Committee.

This action approves the appointments of certain members to the Committee based upon the criteria approved by the City Council at the November 19, 2024 City Council Meeting.

Recommendation:

Recommended Action : It is recommended that the City Council take the following action:
143

1. Formally appoint one (1) City Council Member to serve on the Centennial Steering Committee; and

2. Approve the appointment of City Council Member and Placentia Rotary Member Ward Smith to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the City Council and the Rotary Club of Placentia; and

3. Approve the appointment of Historical Committee Members Bonnie Carren and Kathy Frazee to the Centennial Steering Committee per the recommendation of the Historical Committee; and

4. Approve the appointment of Park, Arts, and Recreation Commissioner Tricia Montelongo to the Centennial Steering Committee per the recommendation of the Park, Arts, and Recreation Committee; and

5. Approve the appointment of Placentia Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Michele Severson to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Placentia Chamber of Commerce; and

6. Approve the appointment of Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association President Rosalina Davis to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association; and

7. Approve the appointment of Heritage Committee Member Kenny Binnings to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Heritage Committee; and

8. Approve the appointment of Placentia Library District Assistant Director Yesenia Baltierra to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Placentia Library District; and

9. Approve the appointment of Kiwanis Club President James Kissinger to the Centennial Steering Committee on behalf of the Kiwanis Club of Placentia; and

10. Approve the appointment of Art Castillo to the Centennial Steering Committee in representation of Council District 2 per the recommendation of Mayor Kirwin (District 2).

Strategic Plan Statement:

This item is consistent with the City Council approved 5-Year Strategic Goal to Increase Community Engagement under Objectives #4.1 and #4.2, which is to Evaluate Alternative and More Creative Methods of Community Outreach and Increase Community Engagement/Outreach.

Discussion:

On November 19, 2024, the City Council authorized the formation of a Centennial Steering Committee (the "Committee") to assist City staff in planning for the City's upcoming Centennial celebration in 2026. The Committee is to be comprised of nineteen (19) members: two (2) City Council Members, one (1) appointed from each of the five (5) City Council districts; one (1) member from Kiwanis Club of Placentia; one (1) member from the Placentia Library; one (1) member from the Rotary Club of Placentia; one (1) member from the Women's Round Table; one (1) member from the Placentia Yorba Linda Unified School District; one (1) member from the Veterans Advisory Committee; one (1) member from the Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association; one (1) member from the Placentia Chamber of Commerce; one (1) member from the Senior Advisory Committee; one (1) member from the Heritage Festival Committee; two (2) members from the Historical Committee. City Staff members will serve as facilitators/liaisons for the Committee.

The City has received a total of ten (10) individuals for the Committee, which including the following:

Historical Committee Members Bonnie Carren and Kathy Frazee 144

Park, Arts, and Recreation Commissioner Tricia Montelongo Placentia Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Michele Severson Placita Santa Fe Merchants Association President Rosalina Davis Heritage Committee Member Kenny Binnings
Placentia Library District Assistant Director Yesenia Baltierra Kiwanis Club President James Kissinger
City Council Member and Placentia Rotary Member Ward Smith District 2 representative Art Castillo, Representing Mayor Kirwin in City Council District 2

The recommended actions will approve the appointments of certain members to the Committee based upon the criteria approved by the City Council at the November 19, 2024 City Council Meeting. If approved, Staff will begin meeting with the members of the Committee on February 10, 2025 and meet monthly on the second Monday of each month at 5:30 p.m. at City Hall. Should no applications be received from a certain community group or Council District, the City will continue to accept applications; however, this will not prohibit the start of the Committee meetings. Applications received after the deadline will be provided to the Council for consideration and, if appointed at a subsequent City Council meeting, the application shall join the Committee.

Fiscal Impact Summary:

At this time there is no fiscal impact associated with the creation of the Committee. The recommended actions will approve the appointments of recommended members from various Placentia community organizations. A total of $30,000 was budgeted in the FY 2024-25 Budget to secure a contractor for the Centennial Commemorative book and Centennial logo design and branding. As such, sufficient funds exist to begin the planning efforts, and the City Council will determine if and what amount of funding will be budgeted in the next fiscal year. 145