FY 2025/26 CIP Study Session Update
April 1, 2025
City of Placentia
1 •Summary of February 18 Council Meeting
•Underground Storage Tank
•Proposed FY 24/25 Street Scope
•Recommendations
•Questions and Comments
Agenda
2 •UST options
•FY24/25 Streets Scope of Work
Summary of February 18th Meeting
3 Underground Storage Tanks
4 Removal Requirement
•SB 445 Underground Storage Tanks: Hazardous Substances:
Petroleum: Groundwater and Surface Water Contamination
Requires removal of single-walled UST by December 31, 2025 •Penalty for non-compliance
$500 - $5,000 per tank, per day, per occurrence
•Estimated removal costs $220,000
Higher if remediation required for diesel UST
5 Replacement Options
•Replace with aboveground storage tanks
Not feasible due to Fire Code requirements
•Fuel Offsite
PYLUSD School District
SC Fuels
Galaxy 76
•Reinstall with underground storage tanks
6 Fuel Offsite
Pros
•Initial cost savings of $880,000
for replacement
•Fueling Flexibility
•Eliminates on-going costs
associated with owning/maintaining
UST
Testing, annual inspections, software &
environmental compliance fees
($8,000/year)
Repairs
Insurance
Cons
•Higher fuel costs
$1 more per gallon unleaded or approx.
$60k/year compared to bulk fuel
Est. $12k more per year for diesel
•Lack of fuel at City facility during
power outage or emergency
•No control over fuel management
and availability
7 Reinstall UST
Pros
•Lower fuel costs
Savings of $1 per gallon unleaded or
approx.$60k/year compared to
commercial fuel pricing
Additional Est. $12k in savings per
year for diesel•Fuel at City facility during power
outage or emergency
•Control over fuel management and
availability
•Expected service life 30 – 50 years
Cons
•Initial cost savings of
$880,000 for replacement
•Fueling Flexibility
•Eliminates on-going
costs associated with
owning/maintaining UST
Testing, annual inspections, software
&environmental compliance
fees ($8,000/year)
Repairs
Insurance
8 Additional Considerations
•Emergency operations
Emergency preparedness
•Primary & backup fueling locations ideal
•Capacity to fuel City fleet for 2 weeks (2,500 gallons unleaded / 500 diesel) •Ability to fuel during power outages or emergencies
•Fuel for City facility backup generators
•Fleet electrification
CARB Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation / zero emissions vehicle replacement requirement
Applies to vehicles with GVWR over 8,500 lbs
•25 vehicles or 21% of the City fleet
9 Recommendation
•Required to remove existing USTs
•Reinstall underground storage tank at City Yard
10 Proposed FY 24/25 Streets Project
for Construction in FY 25/26
11 Council Direction
•On the February 18th Council Meeting staff was directed to focus street rehabilitation efforts within Priority Area 3
•Provide a copy of the Citywide Pavement Condition Index map 12 Future Street Rehabilitation Areas
13 14
Scenario 1 Funding
15 Available Funding
Source for Street Rehabilitation
Amount
SB1/RMRA $1,459,900
Gas Tax $210,918
Measure M $963,322
TOTAL $2,634,140
Scenario 1 - Prioritization Criteria
•Approximately 70% of streets within Priority Area 3 require more intensive pavement rehabilitation
• We are recommending streets be prioritized based on the condition of the pavement within Priority Area 3
•Grouped by Location
16 Estimated Construction Cost:
$2,300,508
Scenario 2
Available Funding
18 Available Funding
Source for Street Rehabilitation
Amount
SB1/RMRA $1,459,900
Gas Tax $210,918
Measure M $963,322
Measure U $2,343,879
TOTAL $4,978,019
Scenario 2 - Prioritization Criteria
•Streets that are in fair condition, but close to the point needing more invasive treatment within the next 7 years receive preventative maintenance.
•Streets are then prioritized based on pavement condition •Grouped by Location
19 Slurry Seal ($/SF)
Cold Mill and
Overlay ($/SF)
Full Depth
Reconstruction ($/SF)
$0.66 $5.33 $10.15
20 Estimated Construction Cost:
$4,294,756
Other Priority Projects
21 Recommendation
•Proceed with funding scenario #2 to be incorporated into upcoming FY25-26 CIP budget
22 Questions?
23